UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549
____________


FORM 10-K

   
  X  þ ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
   
 For the fiscal year ended December 31, 20032004
   
o TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period fromto
   
For the transition period from ____________to ____________
 Commission File Number: 000-50058

Portfolio Recovery Associates, Inc.


(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
   
Delaware 75-3078675


(State or Other Jurisdiction of
(I.R.S. Employer
Incorporation or Organization) (I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)
   
120 Corporate Boulevard, Norfolk, Virginia 23502


(Address of Principal Executive Offices) (Zip Code)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (888) 772-7326

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: None

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:

Common Stock, $0.01 par value per share


(Title of Class)

     Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

YESYES    X     þNO ___o

     Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment of this Form 10-K.o

     Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).

YESþ NOo

     The aggregate market value of the voting stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant as of February 12, 200416, 2005 was $229,374,131.

     Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Exchange Act Rule 12b-2).  Yes     X     No ____$428,781,004.

     The number of shares of the registrant’s Common Stock outstanding as of February 12, 200416, 2005 was 15,299,676.15,504,210.

     Documents incorporated by reference: Portions of the Proxy Statement to be filed by April 30, 20042005 for the Company’s 2004our 2005 Annual Meeting of Stockholders are incorporated by reference into Items 11, 12 and 13 of Part III of this Form 10-K.

1


 

Table of Contents

Part 1
Item 1.      Business3
Item 2.      Properties23
Item 3.      Legal Proceedings23
Item 4.      Submission of Matters to a Vote of Securityholders23
Part II
Item 5.      Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities24
Item 6.      Selected Financial Data25
Item 7.      Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations28
Item 7A.   Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosure about Market Risk43
Item 8.      Financial Statements and Supplementary Data44
Item 9.      Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure69
Item 9A.   Disclosure Controls and Procedures69
Item 9B.   Other Information69
Part III
Item 10.      Directors and Executive Officers of the Registrant70
Item 11.      Executive Compensation73
Item 12.      Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management73
Item 13.      Certain Relationship and Related Transactions73
Item 14.      Principal Accountant Fees and Services73
Part IV
Item 15.      Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules and Reports on Form 8-K75
Signatures77
Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
Section 302 Certification of Chief Executive Officer
Section 302 Certification of Chief Financial Officer
Certification of CEO and CFO to Section 906

2


Cautionary Statements Pursuant to Safe Harbor Provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995:

     This report contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of the federal securities laws. These forward-looking statements involve risks, uncertainties and assumptions that, if they never materialize or prove incorrect, could cause theour results of the Company (as hereinafter defined) to differ materially from those expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. All statements, other than statements of historical fact, are forward-looking statements, including statements regarding overall trends, operating cost trends, liquidity and capital needs and other statements of expectations, beliefs, future plans and strategies, anticipated events or trends, and similar expressions concerning matters that are not historical facts. The risks, uncertainties and assumptions referred to above may include the following:

     • changes in the business practices of debt owners
•  our ability to purchase defaulted consumer receivables at appropriate prices;
•  changes in the business practices of credit originators in terms of selling defaulted consumer receivables or outsourcing defaulted consumer receivables to third-party contingent fee collection agencies;
•  changes in government regulations that affect our ability to collect sufficient amounts on our acquired or serviced receivables;
•  our ability to employ and retain qualified employees, especially collection personnel;
•  changes in the credit or capital markets, which affect our ability to borrow money or raise capital to purchase or service defaulted consumer receivables;
•  the degree and nature of our competition;
•  our ability to comply with the provisions of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and the rules and regulations promulgated thereunder;
•  our ability to successfully integrate our newly acquired subsidiary, IGS Nevada (“IGS”), into our business operations;
•  the sufficiency of our funds generated from operations, existing cash and available borrowings to finance our current operations; and
•  the risk factors listed from time to time in our filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

     • changes in government regulations that affect the Company’s ability to collect sufficient amounts on its acquired or serviced receivables;

     • the Company’s ability to employ and retain qualified employees, especially collection personnel;

     • changes in the credit or capital markets, which affect the Company’s ability to borrow money or raise capital to purchase or service defaulted consumer receivables;

     • the degree and nature of the Company’s competition; and

     • the risk factors listed from time to time in the Company’s filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

PART I

Item 1. Business.

General

     Portfolio Recovery Associates, Inc., together with its subsidiaries (collectively, the “Company”), isWe are a full-service provider of outsourced receivables management. The Company purchases, collectsmanagement and managesrelated services. We purchase, collect and manage portfolios of defaulted consumer receivables.receivables which includes providing collateral location services for credit originators and other debt owners. Defaulted consumer receivables are the unpaid obligations of individuals to credit originators, including banks, credit unions, consumer and auto finance companies, retail merchants and other providers of goods and services. We believe that the strengths of our business are our sophisticated approach to portfolio pricing and servicing, our emphasis on developing and retaining our collection personnel, our sophisticated collections systems and procedures and our relationships with many of the largest consumer lenders in the United States. Our proven ability to service defaulted consumer receivables allows us to offer debt owners a complete outsourced solution to address their defaulted consumer receivables. The defaulted consumer receivables the Company collectswe collect are generally either purchased from sellers of defaulted consumer debt (“Debt Sellers”) or are collected on behalf of debt owners on a commission fee basis. On October 1, 2004, we acquired the assets of IGS Nevada, Inc., which specializes in the location of collateral, securing primarily automobile loans. We believe that

3


this acquisition is highly complementary and inherently related to our collection activities and broadens the services we can offer to our clients. We intend to continue to build on our strengths and grow our business through the disciplined approach that has contributed to our success to date.

     The Company usesWe use the following terminology throughout its reports.our reports: “Cash Receipts” refers to all collections of cash, regardless of the source. “Cash Collections” refers to collections on the Company’sour owned portfolios only, exclusive of commission income and sales of finance receivables. “Amortization Rate” refers to cash collections applied to principal as a percentage of total cash collections. “Cash Sales of Finance Receivables” refers to the sales of the Company’sour owned portfolios. “Commissions” refers to fee income generated from the Company’sour wholly-owned contingent fee subsidiary.and fee-for-service subsidiaries. Prior to the Company’sour initial public offering on November 8, 2002 the Company was(our “IPO”), we were organized as a limited liability company with all income taxes charged to the partners of the partnership. Pro forma adjustments have been made to show the impact of corporate taxes for all periods prior to the Company’sour conversion to a corporation.

     The Company specializesWe specialize in receivables that have been charged-off by the credit originator. Since the Debt Seller hascredit originator and/or other debt servicing companies have unsuccessfully attempted to collect these receivables, the Company iswe are able to purchase them at a substantial discount to their face value. From itsour 1996 inception through December 31, 2003, the Company2004, we acquired 417514 portfolios with a face value of $7.78$11.1 billion for $204.6$265.8 million, or 2.63%2.39% of face value, representing more than 4.16.2 million customer accounts. The success of the Companyour business depends on itsour ability to purchase

2


portfolios of defaulted consumer receivables at appropriate valuations and to collect on those receivables effectively and efficiently. To date, the Company has consistentlywe have been able to collect at a rate of 2.5 to 3.0 times itsour purchase price for defaulted consumer receivables portfolios, as measured over a five to seveneight year period, which has enabled the Companyus to generate increasing profits and positive cash flow.

     The Company hasWe have achieved strong financial results since itsour formation, with cash collections growing from $10.9 million in 1998 to $117.1$153.4 million in 2003.2004. Total revenue has grown from $6.8 million in 1998 to $84.9$113.4 million in 2003,2004, a compound annual growth rate of 66%60%. Similarly, pro forma net income has grown from $402,000 in 1998 to net income of $20.7$27.5 million in 2003.2004. Excluding the impact of proceeds from occasional portfolio sales, cash collections have increased every quarter since the Company’sour formation.

     The Company wasWe were initially formed as Portfolio Recovery Associates, L.L.C., a Delaware limited liability company, on March 20, 1996. Prior to the formation of the Company, foundingPortfolio Recovery Associates, Inc., members of theour current management team played key roles in the development of a defaulted consumer receivables acquisition and divestiture operation for Household Recovery Services, a subsidiary of Household International.International, now owned by HSBC. In connection with an initial public offering, which commenced on November 8, 2002 (the “IPO”),our IPO, all of the membership units of Portfolio Recovery Associates, L.L.C. were exchanged, simultaneously with the effectiveness of the Company’sour registration statement, for a single class of the common stock of Portfolio Recovery Associates, Inc., a new Delaware corporation formed on August 7, 2002. Accordingly, the members of Portfolio Recovery Associates, L.L.C. became the common stockholders of Portfolio Recovery Associates, Inc., which became the parent company of Portfolio Recovery Associates, L.L.C. and its subsidiaries.

     Shares of common stock that were received in exchange for the membership interests of Portfolio Recovery Associates, L.L.C. as a result of this reorganization, which were not registered by the Company’s initial public offering were deemed to have a new “holding period” for purposes of Rule 144 under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and therefore could not be sold before November 6, 2003 unless registered under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or sold under an available exemption from registration, as in an organized stock offering. The “holding period” with respect to these shares has expired; therefore, these shares may now be traded pursuant to Rule 144, which imposes certain limitations on the manner of sale, notice requirements and the availability of the Company’s current public information.

     A secondary offering of shares of common stock of the Company was completed on May 21, 2003, in which 4,025,000 shares were sold. After this transaction, the holders of 6,865,261 shares of the Company’s common stock which were not sold in the secondary offering agreed to a 180-day “lock-up” with respect to these shares. This generally means that holders of these shares were unable sell these shares during the 180 days following the date of the prospectus, or until November 21, 2003. These shares may now be sold in accordance with the provisions of the federal securities laws, including Rule 144.

Competitive Strengths

Complete Outsourced Solution for Debt Owners

     The Company offersWe offer debt owners a complete outsourced solution to address their defaulted consumer receivables. Depending on a debt owner’s timing and needs, the Companywe can either purchase from the debt owner their defaulted consumer receivables, providing immediate cash, or service those receivables on their behalf for either a fee-for-service or a commission fee based on a percentage of itsour collections. Furthermore, the CompanyWe can purchase or service receivables throughout the entire delinquency cycle, from receivables that have only been processed for collection internally by the debt owner to receivables that have been subject to multiple internal and external collection efforts. This flexibility helps the Companyus meet the needs of debt owners and allows itus to become a trusted resource. Furthermore, the Company’sour strength across multiple transaction and asset types provides the opportunity to cross-sell itsour services to debt owners, building on successful engagements. Our acquisition of IGS further broadens the services we can offer to debt owners to include skip tracing and asset location.

4


Disciplined and Proprietary Underwriting Process

     One of the key components of the Company’sour growth has been itsour ability to price portfolio acquisitions at levels that have generated profitable returns on investment. To date, the Company has consistentlywe have been able to collect at a rate of 2.5 to 3.0 times itsour purchase price for defaulted consumer receivables portfolios, as measured

3


over a five to seveneight year period, which has enabled the Companyus to generate increasing profits and cash flow. In order to price portfolios and forecast the targeted collection results for a portfolio, the Company useswe use two separate statistical models developed internally that are oftenmay be supplemented with on-site due diligence of the Debt Seller’sdebt owner’s collection process and loan files. One model analyzes the portfolio as one unit based on demographic comparisons while the second model analyzes each account in a portfolio using variables in a regression analysis. As the Company collectswe collect on itsour portfolios, the results are input back into the models in an ongoing process which the Company believeswe believe increases their accuracy. Through December 31, 2003 the Company has2004 we have acquired 417514 portfolios with a face value of $7.78$11.1 billion.

Ability to Hire, Develop and Retain Productive Collectors

     In an industry characterized by high turnover, the Company’sWe place considerable focus on our ability to hire, develop and retain effective collectors is awho are key to itsour continued growth and profitability. Several large military bases and numerous telemarketing, customer service and reservation phone centers are located near our headquarters and regional offices in Virginia, providing access to a large pool of eligible personnel. The Company hasHutchinson, Kansas and Las Vegas, Nevada areas also provide a sufficient potential workforce of eligible personnel. We have found that tenure is a primary driver of itsour collector effectiveness. The Company offers itsWe offer our collectors a competitive wage with the opportunity to receive unlimited incentive compensation based on performance, as well as an attractive benefits package, a comfortable working environment and the ability to work on a flexible schedule. Stock options were awarded to many of the Company’sour collectors at the time of the IPOinitial public offering in 2002. The Company has2002, and many tenured collectors were awarded nonvested shares in 2004. Most IGS employees were awarded nonvested shares at the time of our purchase of IGS in October 2004. We have a comprehensive six week training program for new owned portfolio collectors and providesprovide continuing advanced training classes which are conducted in itsour four training centers. Recognizing the demands of the job, the Company’sour management team has endeavored to create a professional and supportive environment for collectors. Furthermore, several large military bases and numerous telemarketing, customer service and reservation phone centers are located near the Company’s headquarters and regional offices in Virginia, providing access to a large poolall of trained personnel. The Company has also found the Hutchinson, Kansas area to provide a sufficient potential workforce of trained personnel.our employees.

Established Systems and Infrastructure

     The Company hasWe have devoted significant effort to developing itsour systems, including statistical models, databases and reporting packages, to optimize itsour portfolio purchases and collection efforts. In addition, the Company’sour technology infrastructure is flexible, secure, reliable and redundant to ensure the protection of itsour sensitive data and to ensure minimal exposure to systems failure or unauthorized access. The Company believesWe believe that itsour systems and infrastructure give itus meaningful advantages over itsour competitors. The Company hasWe have developed financial models and systems for pricing portfolio acquisitions, managing the collections process and monitoring operating results. The Company performsWe perform a static pool analysis monthly on each of itsour portfolios, inputting actual results back into itsour acquisition models, to enhance their accuracy. The Company monitorsWe monitor collection results continuously, seeking to identify and resolve negative trends immediately. The Company’sOur comprehensive management reporting package is designed to fully inform the Company’sour management team so that itthey may make timely operating decisions. This combination of hardware, software and proprietary modeling and systems has been developed by the Company’sour management team through years of experience in this industry and the Company believeswe believe provides itus with an important competitive advantage from the acquisition process all the way through collection operations.

Strong Relationships with Major Credit Originators

     The Company hasWe have done business with most of the top consumer lenders in the United States. The Company maintainsWe maintain an extensive marketing effort and itsour senior management team is in contact with known and prospective credit originators. The Company believesWe believe that it haswe have earned a reputation as a reliable purchaser of defaulted consumer receivables portfolios and as responsible collectors. Furthermore, from the perspective of the selling credit originator, the failure to close on a negotiated sale of a portfolio consumes valuable time and expense and can have an adverse effect on pricing when the portfolio is re-marketed. The Company hasWe have never failed to close on a transaction. Similarly, if a credit originator sells a portfolio to a group that violates industry standard collecting practices, it can taint the reputation of the credit originator. The Company goesWe go to great lengths to collect from consumers in a responsible, professional and compliant manner. The Company believes itsWe believe our strong relationships with major credit

5


originators provide itus with access to quality opportunities for portfolio purchases and contingent fee collection placements.

4


Experienced Management Team

     The Company hasWe have an experienced management team with considerable expertise in the accounts receivable management industry. Prior to the Company’sour formation, the firm’sour founders played key roles in the development and management of a consumer receivables acquisition and divestiture operation of Household Recovery Services, a subsidiary of Household International.International, now owned by HSBC. As the Company haswe have grown, the management team has been expanded with a group of successful, seasoned executives.

Risks Related to the Company’sOur Business

     To the extent not described elsewhere in this Annual Report, the following are risks related to the Company’sour business.

We may not be able to purchase defaulted consumer receivables at appropriate prices, and a decrease in our ability to purchase portfolios of receivables could adversely affect our ability to generate revenue

     If we are unable to purchase defaulted receivables from debt owners at appropriate prices, or one or more debt owners stop selling defaulted receivables to us, we could lose a potential source of income and our business may be harmed.

The Companyavailability of receivables portfolios at prices which generate an appropriate return on our investment depends on a number of factors both within and outside of our control, including the following:

•  the continuation of current growth trends in the levels of consumer obligations;
•  sales of receivables portfolios by debt owners; and
•  competitive factors affecting potential purchasers and credit originators of receivables.

     Because of the length of time involved in collecting defaulted consumer receivables on acquired portfolios and the volatility in the timing of our collections, we may not be able to identify trends and make changes in our purchasing strategies in a timely manner.

We may not be able to collect sufficient amounts on itsour defaulted consumer receivables to fund itsour operations

     The Company’sOur business consists of acquiring and servicing receivables that consumers have failed to pay and that the Debt Sellers havecredit originator has deemed uncollectible.uncollectible and has generally charged-off. The Debt Sellersdebt owners generally make numerous attempts to recover on their defaulted consumer receivables, often using a combination of in-house recovery efforts and third-party collection agencies. These defaulted consumer receivables are difficult to collect and the Companywe may not collect a sufficient amount to cover itsour investment associated with purchasing the defaulted consumer receivables and the costs of running itsour business.

The Company’s contingent fee collections operations have a limited operating history

     The Company’s contingent fee collections operations commenced in March 2001. These operations are in the early stages of development. Accordingly, these operations have a limited operating history and their prospects must be considered in light of the risks and uncertainties facing early-stage companies. As of December 31, 2003, the Company has entered into contingent fee collection arrangements with 9 clients. Although the Company is currently generating positive operating income from its contingent fee collections operations, the Company’s limited operating history makes prediction of future results difficult.

The Company may not be able to purchase defaulted consumer receivables at appropriate prices, and a decrease in its ability to purchase portfolios of receivables could adversely affect its ability to generate revenue

     If one or more Debt Sellers stops selling defaulted receivables to the Company and it is otherwise unable to purchase defaulted receivables at appropriate prices, the Company could lose a potential source of income and its business may be harmed.

     The availability of receivables portfolios at prices which generate an appropriate return on the Company’s investment depends on a number of factors both within and outside of its control, including the following:

     • the continuation of current growth trends in the levels of consumer obligations;

     • sales of receivables portfolios by Debt Sellers; and

     • competitive factors affecting potential purchasers and Debt Sellers of receivables.

     Because of the length of time involved in collecting defaulted consumer receivables on acquired portfolios and the volatility in the timing of the Company’s collections, the Company may not be able to identify trends and make changes in its purchasing strategies in a timely manner.

The Company experiencesWe experience high employee turnover rates and itwe may not be able to hire and retain enough sufficiently trained employees to support itsour operations

     The accounts receivables management industry is very labor intensive and, similar to other companies in the Company’sour industry, the Companywe typically experiencesexperience a high rate of employee turnover. The Company’s

5


Our annual turnover rate, excluding those employees that do not complete itsour six week training program, was 37%46% in 2003. The Company competes2004. We compete for qualified personnel with companies in itsour industry and in other industries. The Company’sOur growth requires that itwe continually hire and train new collectors. A higher turnover rate among itsour collectors will increase the Company’sour recruiting and training costs and limit the number of experienced collection personnel available to service itsour defaulted consumer receivables. If this were to occur, the Companywe would not be able to service itsour defaulted consumer receivables effectively and this would reduce itsour ability to continue itsour growth and operate profitability.

6


The Company servesWe serve markets that are highly competitive, and itwe may be unable to compete with businesses that may have greater resources than it haswe have

     The Company facesWe face competition in both of the markets it serveswe serve — owned portfolio and contingent fee based accounts receivable management — from new and existing providers of outsourced receivables management services, including other purchasers of defaulted consumer receivables portfolios, third-party contingent fee collection agencies and debt sellersowners that manage their own defaulted consumer receivables rather than outsourcing them. The accounts receivable management industry is highly fragmented and competitive, consisting of approximately 6,000 consumer and commercial agencies, most of which compete in the contingent fee business.

     The Company facesWe face bidding competition in itsour acquisition of defaulted consumer receivables and in itsour placement of contingent fee based receivables, and the Companywe also competescompete on the basis of reputation, industry experience and performance. Some of the Company’sour current competitors and possible new competitors may have substantially greater financial, personnel and other resources, greater adaptability to changing market needs, longer operating histories and more established relationships in itsour industry than itwe currently has.have. In the future, the Companywe may not have the resources or ability to compete successfully. As there are few significant barriers for entry to new providers of contingent fee based receivables management services, there can be no assurance that additional competitors with greater resources than the Company’sours will not enter itsthe market. Moreover, there can be no assurance that the Company’sour existing or potential clients will continue to outsource their defaulted consumer receivables at recent levels or at all, or that itwe may continue to offer competitive bids for defaulted consumer receivables portfolios. If the Company iswe are unable to develop and expand itsour business or adapt to changing market needs as well as itsour current or future competitors are able to do, the Companywe may experience reduced access to defaulted consumer receivables portfolios at appropriate prices and reduced profitability.

The CompanyWe may not be successful at acquiring receivables of new asset types or in implementing a new pricing structure

     The CompanyWe may pursue the acquisition of receivables portfolios of asset types in which it haswe have little current experience. The CompanyWe may not be successful in completing any acquisitions of receivables of these asset types and itsour limited experience in these asset types may impair itsour ability to collect on these receivables. This may cause the Companyus to pay too much for these receivables and consequently, itwe may not generate a profit from these receivables portfolio acquisitions.

     In addition, the Companywe may in the future provide a service to debt owners in which debt owners will place consumer receivables with itus for a specific period of time for a flat fee. This fee may be based on the number of collectors assigned to the collection of these receivables, the amount of receivables placed or other bases. The CompanyWe may not be successful in determining and implementing the appropriate pricing for this pricing structure, which may cause itus to be unable to generate a profit from this business.

The Company’sOur collections may decrease if certain types of bankruptcy filings involving liquidations increase

     During times ofVarious economic recession, the amount of defaulted consumer receivables generally increases, which contributestrends may contribute to an increase in the amount of personal bankruptcy filings. Under certain bankruptcy filings a debtor’s assets may be sold to repay creditors, but since the defaulted consumer receivables the Company serviceswe service are generally unsecured itwe often would not be able to collect on those receivables. The CompanyWe cannot ensure that itsour collection experience would not decline with an increase in personal bankruptcy filings.filings or a change in bankruptcy regulations or practices. If the Company’sour actual collection experience with respect to a defaulted bankrupt consumer receivables portfolio is significantly lower than it

6


we projected when itwe purchased the portfolio, the Company’sour financial condition and results of operations could deteriorate.

The CompanyWe may make acquisitions that prove unsuccessful or strain or divert itsour resources

     The Company intendsWe intend to consider acquisitions of other companies in itsour industry that could complement itsour business, including the acquisition of entities offering greater access and expertise in other asset types and markets that the Company doesare related but that we do not currently serve. The Company hasWe have little experience in completing acquisitions of other businesses, and it may not be able to successfully complete an acquisition.businesses. If the Company doeswe do acquire other businesses, itwe may not be able to successfully integrate these businesses with itsour own and the Companywe may be unable to maintain itsour standards, controls and policies. Further, acquisitions may place additional constraints on the Company’sour resources by diverting the attention of itsour management from other business concerns. Through acquisitions, the Companywe may enter markets in which it haswe have no or limited experience. Moreover,

7


any acquisition may result in a potentially dilutive issuance of equity securities, the incurrence of additional debt and amortization expenses of related intangible assets, all of which could reduce the Company’sour profitability and harm itsour business.

The Companyloss of IGS customers could negatively affect our operations

     On October 1, we acquired substantially all of the assets of IGS for consideration of $14 million. A significant portion of the valuation was tied to existing client relationships. Our customers, in general, may terminate their relationship with us on 90 days’ prior notice. In the event a customer or customers terminate or significantly cut back any relationship with us, it could reduce our profitability and harm our business and could potentially give rise to an impairment charge related to an intangible asset specifically ascribed to existing client relationships.

We may not be able to continually replace itsour defaulted consumer receivables with additional receivables portfolios sufficient to operate efficiently and profitably

     To operate profitably, the Companywe must continually acquire and service a sufficient amount of defaulted consumer receivables to generate revenue that exceeds itsour expenses. Fixed costs such as salaries and lease or other facility costs constitute a significant portion of the Company’sour overhead and, if it doeswe do not continually replace the defaulted consumer receivables portfolios the Company serviceswe service with additional portfolios, itwe may have to reduce the number of itsour collection personnel. The CompanyWe would then have to rehire collection staff as it obtainswe obtain additional defaulted consumer receivables portfolios. These practices could lead to:

     • low employee morale;

     • fewer experienced employees;

     • higher training costs;

     • disruptions in the Company’s operations;

     • loss of efficiency; and

     • excess costs associated with unused space in the Company’s
•  low employee morale;
•  fewer experienced employees;
•  higher training costs;
•  disruptions in our operations;
•  loss of efficiency; and
•  excess costs associated with unused space in our facilities.

     Furthermore, heightened regulation of the credit card and consumer lending industry or changing credit origination strategies may result in decreased availability of credit to consumers, potentially leading to a future reduction in defaulted consumer receivables available for purchase from Debt Sellers. The Companydebt owners. We cannot predict how itsour ability to identify and purchase receivables and the quality of those receivables would be affected if there is a shift in consumer lending practices, whether caused by changes in the regulations or accounting practices applicable to debt owners, a sustained economic downturn or otherwise.

The CompanyWe may not be able to manage itsour growth effectively

     The Company hasWe have expanded significantly since itsour formation and intendswe intend to maintain itsour growth focus. However, the Company’sour growth will place additional demands on itsour resources and the Companywe cannot ensure that itwe will be able to manage itsour growth effectively. In order to successfully manage itsour growth, the Companywe may need to:

     • expand and enhance its administrative infrastructure;

     • continue to improve its management, financial and information systems and controls; and

7


     • recruit, train, manage and retain its
•  expand and enhance our administrative infrastructure;
•  continue to improve our management, financial and information systems and controls; and
•  recruit, train, manage and retain our employees effectively.

     Continued growth could place a strain on the Company’sour management, operations and financial resources. The CompanyWe cannot ensure that itsour infrastructure, facilities and personnel will be adequate to support itsour future operations or to

8


effectively adapt to future growth. If the Companywe cannot manage itsour growth effectively, itsour results of operations may be adversely affected.

The Company’sOur operations could suffer from telecommunications or technology downtime or increased costs

     The Company’sOur success depends in large part on sophisticated telecommunications and computer systems. The temporary or permanent loss of itsour computer and telecommunications equipment and software systems, through casualty or operating malfunction, could disrupt the Company’sour operations. In the normal course of itsour business, the Companywe must record and process significant amounts of data quickly and accurately to access, maintain and expand the databases it useswe use for itsour collection activities. Any failure of the Company’sour information systems or software and itsour backup systems would interrupt itsour business operations and harm itsour business. The Company’sOur headquarters isare located in a region that is susceptible to hurricane damage, which may increase the risk of disruption of information systems and telephone service for sustained periods.

     Further, the Company’sour business depends heavily on services provided by various local and long distance telephone companies. A significant increase in telephone service costs or any significant interruption in telephone services could reduce itsour profitability or disrupt itsour operations and harm the Company’sour business.

The CompanyWe may not be able to successfully anticipate, manage or adopt technological advances within itsour industry

     The Company’sOur business relies on computer and telecommunications technologies and itsour ability to integrate these technologies into itsour business is essential to the Company’sour competitive position and itsour success. Computer and telecommunications technologies are evolving rapidly and are characterized by short product life cycles. The CompanyWe may not be successful in anticipating, managing or adopting technological changes on a timely basis.

     While the Company believeswe believe that itsour existing information systems are sufficient to meet itsour current demands and continued expansion, the Company’sour future growth may require additional investment in these systems. The Company dependsWe depend on having the capital resources necessary to invest in new technologies to acquire and service defaulted consumer receivables. The CompanyWe cannot ensure that adequate capital resources will be available to itus at the appropriate time.

The Company’sOur senior management team is important to itsour continued success and the loss of one or more members of senior management could negatively affect the Company’sour operations

     The loss of the services of one or more of the Company’sour key executive officers or key employees could disrupt itsour operations. The Company hasWe have employment agreements with Steve Fredrickson, itsour president, chief executive officer and chairman of itsour board of directors, Kevin Stevenson, the Company’sour executive vice president and chief financial officer, Craig Grube, our executive vice president of portfolio acquisitions, and most of itsour other senior executives. The current agreements contain non-compete provisions that survive termination of employment. However, these agreements do not and will not assure the continued services of these officers and the Companywe cannot ensure that the non-compete provisions will be enforceable. The Company’sOur success depends on the continued service and performance of itsour key executive officers, and itwe cannot guarantee that itwe will be able to retain those individuals. The loss of the services of Mr. Fredrickson, Mr. Stevenson, Mr. Grube or one or more of the Company’sour other key executive officers could seriously impair itsour ability to continue to acquire or collect on defaulted consumer receivables and to manage and expand itsour business. The Company maintainsUnder one of our credit agreements, if both Mr. Fredrickson and Mr. Stevenson cease to be president and chief financial officer, respectively, it would constitute a default unless we have a replacement acceptable to our lenders within ten days. We maintain key man life insurance on SteveMr. Fredrickson.

The Company’sOur ability to recover and enforce itsour defaulted consumer receivables may be limited under federal and state laws

     Federal and state laws may limit the Company’sour ability to recover and enforce itsour defaulted consumer receivables regardless of any act or omission on itsour part. Some laws and regulations applicable to credit issuers may preclude the Companyus from collecting on defaulted consumer receivables it purchaseswe purchase if the credit

8


issuer previously failed to comply with applicable laws in generating or servicing those receivables. Collection laws and regulations also directly apply to the Company’sour business. Additional consumer protection and privacy protection laws may be enacted that would impose additional requirements on the enforcement of and collection on consumer credit receivables. Any new laws, rules or regulations that may be adopted, as well as existing consumer protection and privacy protection

9


laws, may adversely affect the Company’sour ability to collect on itsour defaulted consumer receivables and may harm itsour business. In addition, federal and state governmental bodies are considering, and may consider in the future, other legislative proposals that would regulate the collection of the Company’sour defaulted consumer receivables. Additionally, new tax law changes such as Internal Revenue Code Section 6050P (requiring 1099-C returns to be filed on discharge of indebtedness in excess of $600.00) could negatively impact our ability to collect or cause us to incur additional expenses. Although the Companywe cannot predict if or how any future legislation would impact itsour business, itsour failure to comply with any current or future laws or regulations applicable to itus could limit itsour ability to collect on itsour defaulted consumer receivables, which could reduce itsour profitability and harm the Company’sour business.

The Company utilizesOur ability to recover on portfolios of bankrupt consumer receivables may be impacted by changes in federal laws or the change in administrative practices of the various bankruptcy courts

     We recover on consumer receivables that have filed for bankruptcy protection under available U.S. bankruptcy legislation. We recover on consumer receivables that have filed for bankruptcy protection after we acquired them, and we also purchase accounts that are currently in bankruptcy proceedings. If this legislation is amended, or the process in which the various bankruptcy courts administer bankruptcy plans is changed, our ability to recover on bankrupt consumer receivables may be negatively affected.

We utilize the interest method of revenue recognition for determining itsour income recognized on finance receivables, which is based on an analysis of projected cash flows that may prove to be less than anticipated and could lead to reductions in future revenues or impairment charges

     The Company utilizesWe utilize the interest method to determine income recognized on finance receivables. Under this method, each static poolpools of receivables it acquires iswe acquire are modeled upon itstheir projected cash flows. A yield is then established which, when applied to the unamortized purchase price of the receivables, results in the recognition of income at a constant yield relative to the remaining balance in the pool of defaulted consumer receivables. Each static pool is analyzed monthly to assess the actual performance compared to that expected by the model. If differences are noted, the yield is adjusted prospectively to reflect the revised estimate of cash flows. If the accuracy of the modeling process deteriorates or there is a decline in anticipated cash flows, the Companywe would suffer reductions in future revenues or a decline in the carrying value of itsour receivables portfolios or impairment charges, which in eitherany case would result in lower earnings in future periods and could negatively impact the Company’sour stock price.

We may be required to incur impairment charges as a result of the application of the new American Institute of Certified Public Accountants Statement of Position 03-03

     In October 2003, the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (“AICPA”) issued Statement of Position (“SOP”) 03-03, “Accounting for Loans or Certain Securities Acquired in a Transfer.” The SOP provides guidance on accounting for differences between contractual and expected cash flows from an investor’s initial investment in loans or debt securities acquired in a transfer if those differences are attributable, at least in part, to credit quality. The SOP is effective for loans acquired in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2004 and amends Practice Bulletin 6 which remains in effect for loans acquired prior to the SOP effective date. The SOP limits the revenue that may be accrued to the excess of the estimate of expected future cash flows over a portfolio’s initial cost of accounts receivable acquired. The SOP requires that the excess of the contractual cash flows over expected cash flows not be recognized as an adjustment of revenue, expense, or on the balance sheet. The SOP initially freezes the internal rate of return, referred to as IRR, originally estimated when the accounts receivable are purchased for subsequent impairment testing. Rather than lower the estimated IRR if the original collection estimates are not received, effective January 1, 2005, the carrying value of a portfolio will be written down to maintain the then-current IRR. The SOP also amends Practice Bulletin 6 in a similar manner and applies to all loans acquired prior to January 1, 2005. Increases in expected future cash flows can be recognized prospectively through an upward adjustment of the IRR over a portfolio’s remaining life. Any increased yield then becomes the new benchmark for impairment testing. The SOP provides that previously issued annual financial statements would not need to be restated. Historically, as we have applied the guidance of Practice Bulletin 6, we have moved yields upward and downward as appropriate under that guidance. However, since the new SOP guidance does not permit yields to be lowered, under either the revised Practice Bulletin 6 or SOP 03-03, it will increase the probability of us having to incur impairment charges in the future, which could reduce our profitability in a given period and could negatively impact our stock price.

10


We incur increased costs as a result of recently enacted and proposed changes in laws and regulations

     Recently enacted and proposed changes in the laws and regulations affecting public companies, including the provisions of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and rules proposed by the SEC and by the Nasdaq Stock Market, have resulted in increased costs to us as we evaluate the implications of any new rules and respond to and implement their requirements. The new rules could make it more difficult or more costly for us to obtain certain types of insurance, including director and officer liability insurance, and we may be forced to accept reduced policy limits and coverage or incur substantially higher costs to obtain the same or similar coverage. The impact of these events could also make it more difficult for us to attract and retain qualified persons to serve on our board of directors, our board committees or as executive officers. We are presently evaluating and monitoring developments with respect to new and proposed rules and cannot predict or estimate the amount of the additional costs we will incur or the timing of such costs.

The future impact on us of Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 relating to financial controls is unclear at this time

     As directed by Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the SEC adopted rules requiring public companies to include a report by management on the company’s internal control over financial reporting in our annual reports on Form 10-K. This report is required to contain an assessment by management of the effectiveness of such company’s internal controls over financial reporting. In addition, the public accounting firm auditing a public company’s financial statements must attest to and report on management’s assessment of the effectiveness of the company’s internal controls over financial reporting. As is the case with many public companies, at this time the long-term impact of Section 404 on us is unclear. In the future, if we are unable to comply with the requirements of Section 404 in a timely manner, it could result in an adverse reaction in the financial markets due to a loss of confidence in the reliability of our internal controls over financial reporting, which could cause the market price of our common stock to decline and make it more difficult for us to finance our operations.

The market price of our shares of common stock could fluctuate significantly

     Wide fluctuations in the trading price or volume of our shares of common stock could be caused by many factors, including factors relating to our company or to investor perception of our company (including changes in financial estimates and recommendations by research analysts), but also factors relating to (or relating to investor perception of) the accounts receivable management industry or the economy in general.

Our certificate of incorporation, by-laws and Delaware law contain provisions that may prevent or delay a change of control or that may otherwise be in the best interest of our stockholders

     Our certificate of incorporation and by-laws contain provisions that may make it more difficult, expensive or otherwise discourage a tender offer or a change in control or takeover attempt by a third-party, even if such a transaction would be beneficial to our stockholders. The existence of these provisions may have a negative impact on the price of our common stock by discouraging third-party investors from purchasing our common stock. In particular, our certificate of incorporation and by-laws include provisions that:

•  classify our board of directors into three groups, each of which, after an initial transition period, will serve for staggered three-year terms;
•  permit a majority of the stockholders to remove our directors only for cause;
•  permit our directors, and not our stockholders, to fill vacancies on our board of directors;
•  require stockholders to give us advance notice to nominate candidates for election to our board of directors or to make stockholder proposals at a stockholders’ meeting;

11


•  permit a special meeting of our stockholders be called only by approval of a majority of the directors, the chairman of the board of directors, the chief executive officer, the president or the written request of holders owning at least 30% of our common stock;
•  permit our board of directors to issue, without approval of our stockholders, preferred stock with such terms as our board of directors may determine;
•  permit the authorized number of directors to be changed only by a resolution of the board of directors; and
•  require the vote of the holders of a majority of our voting shares for stockholder amendments to our by-laws.

     In addition, we are subject to Section 203 of the Delaware General Corporation Law which provides certain restrictions on business combinations between us and any party acquiring a 15% or greater interest in our voting stock other than in a transaction approved by our board of directors and, in certain cases, by our stockholders. These provisions of our certificate of incorporation and by-laws and Delaware law could delay or prevent a change in control, even if our stockholders support such proposals. Moreover, these provisions could diminish the opportunities for stockholders to participate in certain tender offers, including tender offers at prices above the then-current market value of our common stock, and may also inhibit increases in the trading price of our common stock that could result from takeover attempts or speculation.

Portfolio Acquisitions

     The Company’s     Our portfolio of defaulted consumer receivables includes a diverse set of accounts that can be segmentedcategorized by asset type, age and size of account, level of previous collection efforts and geography. To identify attractive buying opportunities, the Company maintainswe maintain an extensive marketing effort with itsour senior officers contacting known and prospective sellers of defaulted consumer receivables. The Company acquiresWe acquire receivables of Visa®Visa®, MasterCard®MasterCard® and Discover®Discover® credit cards, private label credit cards, installment loans, lines of credit, bankrupt, deficiency balances of various types, and legal judgments, and trade payables, all from a variety of Debt Sellers.debt owners. These Debt Sellersdebt owners include major banks, credit unions, consumer finance companies, telecommunication providers, retailers, utilities, insurance companies, other debt buyers and auto finance companies. In addition, the Company exhibitswe exhibit at trade shows, advertisesadvertise in a variety of trade publications and attendsattend industry events in an effort to develop account purchase opportunities. The CompanyWe also maintainsmaintain active relationships with brokers of defaulted consumer receivables.

     The following chart categorizes the Company’sour life to date owned portfolios as of December 31, 20032004 into the major asset types represented.

                                                
 Life to Date Purchased Face     Life to Date Purchased Face     
 No. of Value of Defaulted Finance Receivables, net as of   Value of Defaulted Consumer Finance Receivables, net as of   
Asset Type Accounts % Consumer Receivables % December 31, 2003 % No. of Accounts % Receivables(1) % December 31, 2004 % 

 
 
 
 
 
 
  
Visa/MasterCard/Discover 1,229,349  29.9% $4,070,113,821  52.3% $47,660,466  51.5% 2,597,772  41.7% $6,756,515,773  60.8% $69,215,200  65.8%
Consumer Finance 1,757,462  42.8% 1,666,699,152  21.4% 10,000,312  10.8% 2,314,898  37.2% 1,964,866,306  17.7% 12,273,607  11.7%
Private Label Credit Cards 1,073,756  26.1% 1,746,593,273  22.5% 32,658,695  35.3% 1,218,119  19.6% 1,833,797,058  16.5% 20,056,840  19.1%
Auto Deficiency 46,639  1.2% 294,980,546  3.8% 2,249,084  2.4% 92,516  1.5% 563,641,429  5.0% 3,643,259  3.4%
 
 
 
 
 
 
              
  
Total: 4,107,206  100.0% $7,778,386,792  100.0% $92,568,557  100.0% 6,223,305  100.0% $11,118,820,566  100.0% $105,188,906  100.0%
 
 
 
 
 
 
              

     The Company


(1)The “Life to Date Purchased Face Value of Defaulted Consumer Receivables” represents the original face amount purchased from sellers and has not been decremented by any adjustments including payments and buybacks (“buybacks” are defined as purchase price refunded by the seller due to the return of non-compliant accounts).

     We have done business with most of the largest 25 consumer lenders in the United States. Since our formation, we have purchased accounts from approximately 68 debt owners.

     We have acquired portfolios at various price levels, depending on the age of the portfolio, its geographic distribution, itsour historical experience with a certain asset type or Debt Sellercredit originator and similar factors. A typical

12


defaulted consumer receivables portfolio ranges from $5$1 million to $75$150 million in face value and contains defaulted consumer receivables from diverse geographic locations with average initial individual account balances of $1,000$400 to $7,000.

9


     The age of a defaulted consumer receivables portfolio (i.e., the(the time since an account has been charged-off) is an important factor in determining the maximum price at which the Companywe will purchase a receivables portfolio. Generally, there is an inverse relationship between the age of a portfolio and the price that the Companyat which we will purchase the portfolio. This relationship is due to the fact that older receivables typically are more difficult to collect. The accounts receivables management industry places receivables into categories depending on the number of collection agencies that have previously attempted to collect on the receivables. Fresh accounts are typically past due 120 to 270 days and charged-off by the credit originator, that are either being sold prior to any post-charge-off collection activity or are placed with a third-party for the first time. These accounts typically sell for the highest purchase price. Primary accounts are typically 270 to 360 days past charge-off,due and charged-off, have been previously placed with one contingent fee servicer and receive a lower purchase price. Secondary and tertiary accounts are typically more than 360 days past charge-off,due and charged-off, have been placed with two or three contingent fee servicers and receive even lower purchase prices.

     As shown in the following chart, as of December 31, 2003,2004, a majority of the Company’s portfoliosour accounts are secondary and tertiary accounts, but it purchaseswe purchase or servicesservice accounts at any point in the delinquency cycle.

                                                
 Life to Date Purchased Face     Life to Date Purchased Face     
 No. of Value of Defaulted Finance Receivables, net as of   Value of Defaulted Consumer Finance Receivables, net as of   
Account Type Accounts % Consumer Receivables % December 31, 2003 % No. of Accounts % Receivables(1) % December 31, 2004 % 

 
 
 
 
 
 
  
Fresh 150,181  3.7% $527,043,932  6.8% $6,672,515  7.2% 178,111  2.9% $574,045,987  5.2% $5,772,493  5.5%
Primary 493,779  12.0% 1,810,169,993  23.2% 26,801,294  29.0% 868,084  13.9% 2,280,076,757  20.5% 34,040,507  32.4%
Secondary 1,320,477  32.2% 2,838,382,673  36.5% 46,308,802  50.0% 1,647,742  26.5% 3,125,641,410  28.1% 35,466,864  33.7%
Tertiary 1,927,410  46.9% 1,742,524,082  22.4% 10,186,908  11.0% 2,721,277  43.7% 3,103,321,798  27.9% 13,372,294  12.7%
Other 215,359  5.2% 860,266,112  11.1% 2,599,038  2.8% 808,091  13.0% 2,035,734,614  18.3% 16,536,748  15.7%
 
 
 
 
 
 
              
  
Total: 4,107,206  100.0% $7,778,386,792  100.0% $92,568,557  100.0% 6,223,305  100.0% $11,118,820,566  100.0% $105,188,906  100.0%
 
 
 
 
 
 
              

     The Company


(1)The “Life to Date Purchased Face Value of Defaulted Consumer Receivables” represents the original face amount purchased from sellers and has not been decremented by any adjustments including payments and buybacks (“buybacks” are defined as purchase price refunded by the seller due to the return of non-compliant accounts).

     We also reviewsreview the geographic distribution of accounts within a portfolio because it haswe have found that certain states have more debtor-friendly laws than others and, therefore, are less desirable from a collectibility perspective. In addition, economic factors and bankruptcy trends vary regionally and are factored into the Company’sour maximum purchase price equation.

1013


 

     As the     The following chart illustrates, as of December 31, 2003 the Company’ssets forth our overall life to date portfolio of defaulted consumer receivables is generally balanced geographically.geographically as of December 31, 2004:

                
                  Life to Date Purchased Face   
 Life to Date Purchased Face Value   No. of Value of Defaulted Consumer   
Geographic DistributionGeographic Distribution No. of Accounts % of Defaulted Consumer Receivables % Accounts % Receivables(1) % 


 
 
 
 
TexasTexas 1,232,971  30.00% $1,172,678,667  15% 1,601,265  26% $1,619,034,346  15%
CaliforniaCalifornia 340,759  9.00% 864,734,270  11% 545,267  9% 1,323,273,564  12%
FloridaFlorida 247,210  6.00% 698,218,172  9% 392,920  6% 1,088,999,811  10%
New YorkNew York 201,506  5.00% 626,331,533  8% 283,998  5% 803,459,120  7%
PennsylvaniaPennsylvania 113,490  3.00% 298,085,983  4% 158,195  3% 396,715,998  4%
New Jersey 79,605  2.00% 241,965,371  3%
North CarolinaNorth Carolina 92,135  2.00% 240,237,212  3% 154,112  2% 365,070,174  3%
IllinoisIllinois 93,038  3.00% 217,062,496  3% 208,962  3% 345,243,649  3%
New Jersey 113,954  2% 336,564,202  3%
OhioOhio 90,127  2.00% 212,717,950  3% 175,397  3% 316,303,826  3%
GeorgiaGeorgia 79,781  2.00% 205,372,104  2% 123,590  2% 291,493,486  3%
MassachusettsMassachusetts 79,257  2.00% 202,126,143  2% 123,140  2% 279,409,707  3%
MichiganMichigan 75,430  2.00% 179,104,358  2% 164,597  3% 257,463,702  2%
South Carolina 105,785  2% 236,267,231  2%
MissouriMissouri 179,587  4.00% 163,950,494  2% 242,916  4% 217,551,425  2%
South Carolina 46,090  1.00% 141,260,687  2%
Arizona 49,794  1.00% 133,243,860  2%
Maryland 85,520  1% 200,093,308  2%
TennesseeTennessee 56,071  1.00% 131,632,798  2% 88,891  1% 192,370,612  2%
Virginia 54,025  1.00% 129,127,204  2%
Maryland 45,896  1.00% 124,432,497  2%
OtherOther 950,434  23.00% 1,796,104,993  23%(1) 1,654,796  26% 2,849,506,405  24%(2)
 
 
 
 
          
  
Total:
 6,223,305  100% $11,118,820,566  100%
Total: 4,107,206  100% $7,778,386,792  100%         
 
 
 
 
 


(1)The “Life to Date Purchased Face Value of Defaulted Consumer Receivables” represents the original face amount purchased from sellers and has not been decremented by any adjustments including payments and buybacks (defined as purchase price refunded by the seller due to the return of non-compliant accounts).
(2) Each state included in “Other” represents under 2% of the face value of total defaulted consumer receivables.

Purchasing Process

     The Company acquiresWe acquire portfolios from Debt Sellersdebt owners through both an auction and a negotiated sale process. In an auction process, the Debt Sellerseller will assemble a portfolio of receivables and either broadly offer the portfolio to the market or will seek purchase prices from specifically invited potential purchasers. In a privately negotiated sale process, the Debt Sellerdebt owner will contact known, reputable purchasers directly and negotiate the terms of sale. On a limited basis, the Companywe also acquiresacquire accounts in forward flow contracts. Under a forward flow contract, the Company agreeswe agree to purchase defaulted consumer receivables from a Debt Sellerdebt owner on a periodic basis, at a set percentage of face value of the receivables over a specified time period. These agreements typically have a provision requiring that the attributes of the receivables to be sold will not significantly change each month and that the Debt Seller’sdebt owner efforts to collect these receivables will not change. If this provision is not provided for, the contract will allow for the early termination of the forward flow contract by the purchaser. Forward flow contracts are a consistent source of defaulted consumer receivables for accounts receivables management providers and provide the Debt Sellersdebt owner with a reliable source of revenue and a professional resolution of defaulted consumer receivables.

     In a typical sale transaction, a Debt Sellerdebt owner distributes a computer disk or data tapefile containing 10ten to 15fifteen basic data fields on each receivables account in the portfolio offered for sale. Such fields typically include the consumer’s name, address, outstanding balance, date of charge-off, date of last payment and the date the account was opened. The Company performs itsWe perform our initial due diligence on the portfolio by electronically cross-checking the data fields on the computer disk or data tape against the accounts in its owned portfolios and against national demographic and credit databases. The Company compilesWe compile a variety of portfolio level reports examining all demographic data available. When valuing pools of bankrupt consumer receivables, we seek to access information on the status of each account’s bankruptcy case.

14


     In order to determine a maximum purchase price for a portfolio, the Company useswe use two separate computer models developed internally that often aremay be supplemented with on-site due diligence of the seller’s collection operation and/or a review of their loan origination files, collection notes and work processes. The Company analyzesWe analyze the portfolio using itsour proprietary multiple regression model, which analyzes each account of the portfolio using variables in the regression model. In addition, the Company analyzeswe analyze the portfolio using an

11


adjustment model, which uses an appropriate cash flow model depending upon whether it is a purchase of fresh, primary, secondary or tertiary accounts. Then, adjustments can be made to the cash flow model to compensate for demographic attributes supported by a detailed analysis of demographic data. This process yields the Company’sFrom these models we derive our quantitative purchasing analysis which is used to help price transactions. The multiple regression model is also used to prioritize collection work efforts subsequent to purchase. With respect to prospective forward flow contracts and other long-term relationships, in addition to the procedures outlined above, as we receive new flows under the Companyaforementionened contract we may obtain a representative test portfolio to evaluate and compare the performance of the portfolio to the projections the Companywe developed in itsour purchasing analysis. In addition, when purchasing bankrupt consumer receivables, we utilize a specifically designed pricing model.

     The Company’sOur due diligence and portfolio review results in a comprehensive analysis of the proposed portfolio. This analysis compares defaulted consumer receivables in the prospective portfolio with the Company’sour collection history in similar portfolios. The CompanyWe then uses itsuse our multiple regression model to value each account. Using the two valuation approaches, the Company determineswe determine cash collections over the life of the portfolio. The CompanyWe then summarizessummarize all anticipated cash collections and associated direct expenses and projectsproject a collectibility value expressed both in dollars and liquidation percentage and a detailed expense projection over the portfolio’s estimated fivesix to seven year economic life. The Company usesWe use the total projected collectibility value to determine an appropriate purchase price.

     The Company maintainsWe maintain a detailed static pool analysis on each portfolio that it haswe have acquired, capturing all demographic data and revenue and expense items for further analysis. The Company usesWe use the static pool analysis to refine the underwriting models that it useswe use to price future portfolio purchases. The results of the static pool analysis are input back into the Company’sour models, increasing the accuracy of the models as the data set increases with every portfolio purchase and each day’s collection efforts.

     The quantitative and qualitative data derived in the Company’sour due diligence is evaluated together with itsour knowledge of the current defaulted consumer receivables market and any subjective factors that management may know about the portfolio or the Debt Seller.debt owner. A portfolio acquisition approval memorandum is prepared for each prospective portfolio before a purchase price is submitted to the seller.debt owner. This approval memorandum, which outlines the portfolio’s anticipated collectibility and purchase structure, is distributed to members of the Company’sour investment committee. The approval by the committee sets a maximum purchase price for the portfolio. The investment committee is currently comprised of Steve Fredrickson, CEO and President, Kevin Stevenson, CFO and Craig Grube, EVPExecutive Vice President — Acquisitions.

     Once a portfolio purchase has been approved by the Company’sour investment committee and the terms of the sale have been agreed to with the seller,debt owner, the acquisition is documented in an agreement that contains customary terms and conditions. Provisions are typically incorporated for bankrupt, disputed, fraudulent or deceased accounts and typically, the sellerdebt owner either agrees to repurchase these accounts or replace them with acceptable replacement accounts within certain time frames.

Owned Collection Operations

     The Company’sOur work flow management system places, recalls and prioritizes accounts in collectors’ work queues, based on the Company’sour analyses of itsour accounts and other demographic, credit and prior work collection attributes. The Company usesWe use this process to focus itsour work effort on those consumers most likely to pay on their accounts and to rotate to other collectors the non-paying but most likely to pay accounts from which other collectors have been unsuccessful in receiving payment. The majority of the Company’sour collections occur as a result of telephone contact with consumers.

     The collectibility forecast for a newly acquired portfolio will help determine collection strategy. Accounts which are determined to have the highest predicted collectibilitycollection probability may be sent immediately to collectors’ work queues. Less collectible accounts may be set aside as house accounts to be collected using a predictive

15


dialer or other passive, low cost method. All newly purchasedSome accounts are campaign dialed formay be worked using a period of time for maximum penetration prior to distribution to collector queues. At such time, only those accounts with acceptable minimum scores are distributed to collection queues. The Companyletter and/or settlement strategy. We may obtain credit reports for the most collectiblevarious accounts after the collection process begins.

12


     When a collector establishes contact with a consumer, the account information is placed automatically in the collector’s work queue. The Company’sOur computer system allows each collector to view all the scanned documents relating to the consumer’s account, which can include the original account application and payment checks. A typical collector work queue may include 650 to 1,000 accounts or more, depending on the skill level and tenure of the collector. The work queue is depleted and replenished automatically by the Company’sour computerized work flow system.

     On the initial contact call, the consumer is given a standardized presentation regarding the benefits of resolving his or her account with the Company.us. Emphasis is placed on determining the reason for the consumer’s default in order to better assess the consumer’s situation and create a plan for repayment. The collector is incentivized to have the consumer pay the full balance of the account. If the collector cannot obtain payment of the full balance, the collector will suggest a repayment plan which generally includes an approximate 20% down payment with the balance to be repaid over an agreed upon period. At times, when determined to be appropriate, and in many cases with management approval, a reduced lump-sum settlement may be agreed upon. If the consumer elects to utilize an installment plan, the Company haswe have developed a system to make monthly withdrawals from a consumer’s bank account.

     If a collector is unable to establish contact with a consumer based on information received, the collector must undertake skip tracing procedures to develop important account information. Skip tracing is the process of developing new phone, address, job or asset information on a consumer. Each collector does his or her own skip tracing using a number of computer applications available at his or her workstation, as well as a series of automated skip tracing procedures implemented by the Companyus on a regular basis.

     Accounts for which the consumer has the likely ability, but not the willingness, to resolve their obligations are reviewed for legal action. Depending on the balance of the defaulted consumer receivable and the applicable state collection laws, the Company determineswe determine whether to commence legal action to judicially collect on the receivable. The legal process can take an extended period of time, but it also generates cash collections that likely would not have been realized otherwise.

     The Company’sOur legal recovery department oversees and coordinates an independent nationwide collections attorney network which is responsible for the preparation and filing of judicial collection proceedings in multiple jurisdictions, determining the suit criteria, coordinating sales of property and instituting wage garnishments to satisfy judgments. This network consists of approximately 70 independent law firms who work on a contingent fee basis. The Company’sLegal cash collections currently constitute approximately 30% of our total cash collections. As our portfolio matures, a larger number of accounts will be directed to our legal recovery department for judicial collection; consequently, we anticipate that legal cash collections will grow commensurately and comprise a larger percentage of our total cash collections. During 2004, we began using staff attorneys to pursue legal collections in certain states and under certain circumstances. This practice is currently very limited, but is expected to grow over time.

     Our bankruptcy department also processes proofs of claims for recovery on receivables which are included in consumer bankruptcies filed under Chapter 13 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code, and submits claims against estates in cases involving deceased debtors having assets at the time of death. Legal cash collections currently constitute approximately 26%Proposed amendments to federal bankruptcy laws, if passed, could have an impact upon our operations. The amendments, which, among other things, propose to establish income criteria for the filing of a Chapter 7 bankruptcy petition, are expected to cause more debtors to file bankruptcy petitions under Chapter 13, rather than Chapter 7 of the Company’s total cash collections. AsU.S. Bankruptcy Code. Consequently, if this legislation is passed, we expect that fewer debtors will be able to have their obligations completely discharged in Chapter 7 bankruptcy actions, and will instead resort to filing bankruptcy petitions under Chapter 13, which requires that the Company’s portfolio matures,debtor establish a payment plan. We expect that this will enable us to generate recoveries from a larger number of accounts will be directed to its legal recovery department for judicial collection; consequently,bankrupt debtors through the Company anticipates that legal cash collections will grow commensurately and comprise a larger percentagefiling of its total cash collections.proofs of claims with the trustees of bankruptcy courts.

Contingent FeeFee-for-Service Collections Operations

     In order to provide debt owners with alternative collection solutions and to capitalize on common competencies between a contingent feefee-for-service collections operation and an acquired receivables portfolio business, the Company we

16


commenced itsour third-party contingent fee collections operations in March 2001. In a contingent fee arrangement, debt owners typically place defaulted receivables with an outsourced providera third party collection agency once they have ceased their recovery efforts. The debt owners then pay the third-party agency a commission fee based upon the amount actually collected from the consumer. A contingent fee placement of defaulted consumer receivables is usually for a fixed time frame, typically four to six months, or as long as nine months or more if there have been previous collection efforts.months. At the end of this fixed period, the third-party agency will return the uncollected defaulted consumer receivables to the debt owner, which may then place the defaulted consumer receivables with another collection agency or sell the portfolio of receivables.

     The determination of the commission fee to be paid for third-party collections is generally based upon the age and potential collectibility of the defaulted consumer receivables being assigned for placement. For example, if there has been no prior third-party collection activity with respect to the defaulted consumer receivables, the

13


commission fee would be lower than if there had been one or more previous collection agencies attempting to collect on the receivables. The earlier the placement of defaulted consumer receivables in the collection process, the higher the probability of receiving a cash collection and, therefore, the lower the cost to collect and the lower the commission fee. Other factors, such as the location of the consumers, the size of the defaulted consumer receivables, competition among third party agencies, and the clients’ collection procedures and work standards also contribute to establishing a commission fee.

     Once a defaulted consumer receivable has been placed with the Company, the collection process operates in a slightly different manner than with its portfolio acquisition business. Servicing time limitations imposed by the debt owner requires a greater emphasis on immediate settlements and larger down payments, compared to much longer term repayment plans common with the Company’s owned portfolios of defaulted consumer receivables. In addition work standards are often dictated by the debt owner. While the Company’sto our historical contingent fee collections operations utilize their own collectorsbusiness as described above, revenues from our new IGS business are accounted for as commission revenue. IGS performs skip tracing services for auto finance companies for a fee. The fee earned is generally determined by whether the debtor was located, we coordinate repossession of the collateral, we coordinate payment between the client and collection system, the Company has beencustomer or if the debtor is found. For example, if the debtor is not found, our fee is less than if the debtor is found and we are able to leverage the portfolio acquisition business’ infrastructure, existing facilities and skill set of its management teamarrange for an agent to provide support for this business operation. The leveraged competenciestake possession of the portfolio acquisition business include its sophisticated technology systems, account and portfolio scoring abilities, and training techniques.collateral securing the loan.

Competition

     The Company facesWe face competition in both of the markets it serveswe serve — owned portfolio and contingent feefee-for-service accounts receivable management — from new and existing providers of outsourced receivables management services, including other purchasers of defaulted consumer receivables portfolios, third-party contingent fee collection agencies and debt owners that manage their own defaulted consumer receivables rather than outsourcing them. The accounts receivable management industry (owned portfolio and contingent fee) is highly fragmented and competitive, consisting of approximately 6,000 consumer and commercial agencies. The Company estimatesWe estimate that more than 90% of these agencies compete in the contingent fee market. There are few significant barriers for entry to new providers of contingent fee receivables management services and, consequently, the number of agencies serving the contingent fee market may continue to grow. Greater capital needs and the need for portfolio evaluation expertise sufficient to price portfolios effectively constitute significant barriers for entry to new providers of owned portfolio receivables management services.

     The Company facesWe face bidding competition in itsour acquisition of defaulted consumer receivables and in obtaining placement of contingent feefee-for-service receivables. The CompanyWe also competescompete on the basis of reputation, industry experience and performance. Among the positive factors which the Company believeswe believe influence itsour ability to compete effectively in this market are itsour ability to bid on portfolios at appropriate prices, itsour reputation from previous transactions regarding itsour ability to close transactions in a timely fashion, itsour relationships with originators of defaulted consumer receivables, itsour team of well-trained collectors who provide quality customer service and compliance with applicable collections laws, itsour ability to collect on various asset types and itsour ability to provide both purchased and contingent fee solutions to debt owners. Among the negative factors which the Company believeswe believe could influence itsour ability to compete effectively in this market are that some of itsour current competitors and possible new competitors may have substantially greater financial, personnel and other resources, greater adaptability to changing market needs, longer operating histories and more established relationships in itsour industry than the Companywe currently has.have.

Information Technology

Technology Operating Systems and Server Platform

     The scalability of the Company’sour systems provides itus with a technology system that is flexible, secure, reliable and redundant to ensure the protection of itsour sensitive data. The Company utilizesWe utilize Intel-based servers running industry standard

17


open systems coupled with Microsoft Windows 2000/2003 and NT Server operating systems. In addition, the Company utilizeswe utilize a blend of purchased and proprietary software systems tailored to the needs of itsour business. These systems are designed to eliminate inefficiencies in the Company’sour collections, continue to meet business objectives in a changing environment and meet compliance obligations with regulatory entities. The Company believesWe believe that itsour combination of purchased and proprietary software packages provide collections automation that is superior to itsour competitors. Our proprietary hardware and software systems are being leveraged to manage location information, phone and operational applications for IGS. We believe our custom solutions will enhance the overall investigative capabilities of this business while meeting compliance obligations with regulatory entities.

14


Network Technology

     To provide delivery of the Company’sour applications, it utilizeswe utilize Intel-based workstations across itsour entire business operations. The environment is configured to provide speeds of 100 megabytes to the desktops of itsour collections and administration staff. The Company’sOur one gigabyte server network architecture supports high-speed data transport. The Company’sOur network system is designed to be scalable and meet expansion and inter-building bandwidth and quality of service demands.

Database Systems

     The ability to access and utilize data is essential to the Companyus being able to operate nationwide in a cost-effective manner. The Company’sOur centralized computer-based information systems support the core processing functions of itsour business under a set of integrated databases and are designed to be both replicable and scalable to accommodate itsour internal growth. This integrated approach helps to assure that consistent sources are processed efficiently. The Company usesWe use these systems for portfolio and client management, skip tracing, check taking, financial and management accounting, reporting, and planning and analysis. The systems also support the Company’sour consumers, including on-line access to account information, account status and payment entry. The Company usesWe use a combination of Microsoft, Oracle and Cache database software to manage itsour portfolios, financial, customer and sales data, and the Company believeswe believe these systems will be sufficient for itsour needs for the foreseeable future. The Company’sOur contingent fee collections operations database incorporates an integrated and proprietary predictive dialing platform used with itsour predictive dialer discussed below. For our newly acquired business unit, IGS, we are completing initial development of a proprietary platform that will be enhanced for scalability in the future.

Redundancy, System Backup, Security and Disaster Recovery

     The Company’sOur data centers provide the infrastructure for innovative collection services and uninterrupted support of hardware and server management, server co-location and an all-inclusive server administration for itsour business. The Company believes itsWe believe our facilities and operations include sufficient redundancy, file back-up and security to ensure minimal exposure to systems failure or unauthorized access. The preparations in this area include the use of call centers in Virginia and in Kansas in order to help provide redundancy for data and processes should one site be completely disabled. The Company hasWe have a comprehensive disaster recovery plan covering itsour business that is tested on a periodic basis. The combination of the Company’sour locally distributed call control systems provides enterprise-wide call and data distribution between itsour call centers for efficient portfolio collection and business operations. In addition to real-timedata replication of data between the sites, incremental backups of both software and databases are performed on a daily basis and a full system backup is performed weekly. Backup data tapes are stored at an offsite location along with copies of schedules and production control procedures, procedures for recovery using an off-site data center, documentation and other critical information necessary for recovery and continued operation. The Company’sOur Virginia headquarters has two separate power and telecommunications feeds, an uninterruptible power supply and a diesel-generator power plant, that provide a level of redundancy should a power outage or interruption occur. The CompanyWe also employsemploy rigorous physical and electronic security to protect itsour data. The Company’sOur call centers have restricted card key access and appropriate additional physical security measures. Electronic protections include data encryption, firewalls and multi-level access controls. The facility which currently houses IGS features uninterruptible power supply units and electronic protections. Full-scale site power, telecommunication and all of the other systems abilities of our other sites will be installed at IGS during 2005.

18


Plasma Displays for Real Time Data Utilization

     The Company utilizesWe utilize plasma displays at its Virginia facilitiesour main facility to aid in recovery of portfolios. The displays provide real-time business-critical information to the Company’sour collection personnel for efficient collection efforts such as telephone, production, employee status, goal trending, training and corporate information.

Dialer Technology

     The Noble Systems Predictive Dialer ensures that the Company’sour collection staff focuses on certain defaulted consumer receivables according to the Company’sour specifications. The Company’sOur predictive dialer takes account of all campaign and dialing parameters and is able to constantly adjust its dialing pace to match changes in campaign conditions and provide the lowest possible wait times.

15


Employees

     The CompanyWe employed 798948 persons on a full-time basis, including 590652 collectors on itsour owned portfolios, and an additional 5769 collectors working in itsour contingent fee collections operations and 28 collectors working in our IGS operations, as of December 31, 2003.2004. None of the Company’sour employees are represented by a union or covered by a collective bargaining agreement. The Company believesWe believe that itsour relations with itsour employees are good.

Hiring

     The Company recognizesWe recognize that itsour collectors are critical to the success of itsour business as a majority of the Company’sour collection efforts occur as a result of telephone contact with consumers. The Company hasWe have found that the tenure and productivity of itsour collectors are directly related. Therefore, attracting, hiring, training, retaining and motivating itsour collection personnel is a major focus for the Company. The Company pays itsus. We pay our collectors competitive wages and offersoffer employees a full benefits program which includes comprehensive medical coverage, short and long term disability, life insurance, dental and vision coverage, pre-paid legal plan, an employee assistance program, supplemental indemnity, cancer, hospitalization, accident insurance, a flexible spending account for child care and a matching 401(k) program. In addition to a base wage, the Company provideswe provide collectors with the opportunity to receive unlimited compensation through an incentive compensation program that pays bonuses above a set monthly base, based upon each collector’s collection results. This program is designed to ensure that employees are paid based not only on performance, but also on consistency. The Company hasWe have awarded stock optionsbased compensation to many of the Company’sour tenured collectors. The Company believesWe believe that these practices have enabled it to achieve anhelped us maintain a relatively low annual post-training turnover rate of 37%46% in 2003.2004.

     A large number of telemarketing, customer-service and reservation phone centers are located near the Company’sour Virginia headquarters. The Company believesWe believe that it offerswe offer a competitive and, in many cases, a higher base wage than many local employers and therefore hashave access to a large number of trainedeligible personnel. In addition, there are approximately 100,000 active-duty military personnel in the area. The Company employsWe employ numerous military spouses and retirees and findsfind them to be an excellent source of employees. The Company hasWe have also found the Las Vegas, Nevada and Hutchinson, Kansas areaareas to provide a large potential workforce of trainedeligible personnel.

Training

     The Company providesWe provide a comprehensive six-weeksix week training program for all new owned portfolio collectors. The first three weeks of the training program is comprised of lectures to learn collection techniques, state and federal collection laws, systems, negotiation skills, skip tracing and telephone use. These sessions are then followed by an additional three weeks of practical experience conducting live calls with additional managerial supervision in order to provide employees with confidence and guidance while still contributing to the Company’sour profitability. Each trainee must successfully pass a comprehensive examination before being assigned to the collection floor. In addition, the Company conductswe conduct continuing advanced classes in itsour four training centers. The Company’sOur technology and systems allow itus to monitor individual employees and then offer additional training in areas of deficiency to increase productivity.

Legal19


Outsourced Collections Department

Legal Recovery Department

     An important component of the Company’sour collections effort involves its legal recoveryour outsourced collections department and the judicial collection of accounts of customers who have the ability, but not the willingness, to resolve their obligations. Accounts for which the consumer is not cooperative and for which we can establish a garnishable job or attachable asset are reviewed for legal action. Depending on the balance of the defaulted consumer receivable and the applicable state collection laws, we determine whether to commence legal action to collect on the receivable. The Company’slegal process can take an extended period of time, but it also generates cash collections that likely would not have been realized otherwise. Our legal recovery department oversees and coordinates an independent nationwide attorney network which is responsible for the preparation and filing of judicial collection proceedings in multiple jurisdictions, determining the suit criteria, coordinating sales of property and instituting wage garnishments to satisfy judgments. This nationwide collections attorney network consists of approximately 70 independent law firms. The Company’sfirms who work on a contingent fee basis. Legal cash collections currently constitute approximately 30% of our total collections. As our portfolio matures, a larger number of accounts will be directed to our outsourced collections department for judicial collection; consequently, we anticipate that legal recoverycollections will grow commensurately and comprise a larger percentage of our total cash collections. During 2004, we began using staff attorneys to pursue legal collections in certain states and under certain circumstances. This practice is currently very limited, but is expected to grow over time.

Bankruptcy

     Our bankruptcy department also submits claims against estates in cases involving deceased debtors having assets at the time of death, and processes proofs of claims for recovery on accounts which are included in consumer bankruptcies filed under Chapter 13 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code. Recent proposedProposed amendments to federal bankruptcy laws, if passed, will very likelycould have an impact upon the Company’sour operations. The amendments, which, among other things, propose to establish income criteria for the filing of a Chapter 7

16


bankruptcy petition, are expected to cause more debtors to file bankruptcy petitions under Chapter 13, rather than Chapter 7 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code. Consequently, the Company expectsif this legislation is passed, we expect that fewer debtors will be able to have their obligations completely discharged in Chapter 7 bankruptcy actions, and will instead enter intoresort to filing bankruptcy petitions under Chapter 13, which requires that the debtor establish a payment plans required by Chapter 13. The Company expectsplan. We expect that this will enable itus to generate recoveries from a larger number of bankrupt debtors through the filing of proofs of claims with the trustees of bankruptcy trustees.courts.

Corporate Legal Department

     The Company’sOur corporate legal department manages general corporate legal matters, includingsuch as litigation management, insurance management and risk assessment, contract and document preparation and review, including real estate purchase and lease agreements and portfolio purchase documents, federal securities law and other regulatory and statutory compliance, obtaining and maintaining multi-state licensing, bonding and insurance, and dispute and complaint resolution. As a part of its compliance functions, the Company’sour corporate legal department also provides oversight to our Quality Control Department and assists with training the Company’s staff. The Company providesfor our staff in relevant areas. We provide employees with extensive training on the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act and other relevant laws and regulations. The Company’sOur corporate legal department distributes guidelines and procedures for collection personnel to follow when communicating with a customer,customers, customer’s agents, attorneys and other parties during itsour recovery efforts. In addition, the Company’sour corporate legal department regularly researches, and provides collectioncollections personnel and the training departmentour Training Department with summaries and updates of changes in, federal and state statutes and relevant case law, so that they are aware of newand in compliance with changing laws and judicial interpretations of applicable requirements and lawsdecisions when tracing or collecting an account.accounts.

Regulation

     Federal and state statutes establish specific guidelines and procedures which debt collectors must follow when collecting consumer accounts. It is the Company’sour policy to comply with the provisions of all applicable federal laws and comparable state statutes in all of itsour recovery activities, even in circumstances in which itwe may not be

20


specifically subject to these laws. The Company’sOur failure to comply with these laws could have a material adverse effect on itus in the event and to the extent that they apply to some or all of the Company’sour recovery activities. Federal and state consumer protection, privacy and related laws and regulations extensively regulate the relationship between debt collectors and debtors, and the relationship between customers and credit card issuers. Significant federal laws and regulations applicable to the Company’sour business as a debt collector include the following:

     •Fair Debt Collection Practices Act.This act imposes certain obligations and restrictions on the practices of debt collectors, including specific restrictions regarding communications with consumer customers, including the time, place and manner of the communications. This act also gives consumers certain rights, including the right to dispute the validity of their obligations.

     •Fair Credit Reporting Act.This act places certain requirements on credit information providers regarding verification of the accuracy of information provided to credit reporting agencies and investigating consumer disputes concerning the accuracy of such information. The Company providesWe provide information concerning itsour accounts to the three major credit reporting agencies, and it is the Company’sour practice to correctly report this information and to investigate credit reporting disputes. The Fair and Accurate Credit Transactions Act amended the Fair Credit Reporting Act to include additional duties applicable to data furnishers with respect to information in the consumer’s credit file that the consumer identifies as resulting from identity theft, and requires that data furnishers have procedures in place as of December 1, 2004 to prevent such information from being furnished to credit reporting agencies. We have instituted measures to effect compliance with these requirements.

     •Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act.This act requires that certain financial institutions, including collection agencies, develop policies to protect the privacy of consumers’ private financial information and provide notices to consumers advising them of their privacy policies. This act also requires that if private personal information concerning a consumer is shared with another unrelated institution, the consumer must be given an opportunity to opt out of having such information shared. Since the Company doeswe do not share consumer information with non-related entities, except as required by law, or except as needed to collect on the receivables, itsour consumers are not entitled to any opt-out rights under this act. This act is enforced by the Federal Trade Commission, which has retained exclusive jurisdiction over its enforcement, and does not afford a private cause of action to consumers who may wish to pursue legal action against a financial institution for violations of this act.

     •Electronic Funds Transfer Act.This act regulates the use of the Automated Clearing House (“ACH”) system to make electronic funds transfers. All ACH transactions must comply with the rules of the National Automated Check Clearing House Association (“NACHA”) and Uniform Commercial Code § 3-402. This act, the NACHA regulations and the Uniform Commercial Code give the consumer, among other things, certain

17


privacy rights with respect to the transactions, the right to stop payments on a pre-approved fund transfer, and the right to receive certain documentation of the transaction. This act also gives consumers a right to sue institutions which cause financial damages as a result of their failure to comply with its provisions.

     •Telephone Consumer Protection Act.In the process of collecting accounts, the Company useswe use automated predictive dialers to place calls to consumers. This act and similar state laws place certain restrictions on telemarketers and users of automated dialing equipment who place telephone calls to consumers.

     •Servicemembers Civil Relief Act.The Soldiers’ and Sailors’ Civil Relief Act of 1940 was amended in December 2003 as the Servicemembers Civil Relief Act (“SCRA”). The SCRA gives U.S. military service personnel relief from credit obligations they may have incurred prior to entering military service, and may also apply in certain circumstances to obligations and liabilities incurred by a servicemember while serving on active duty. The SCRA prohibits creditors from taking specified actions to collect the defaulted accounts of servicemembers. The SCRA impacts many different types of credit obligations, including installment contracts and court proceedings, and tolls the statute of limitations during the time that the servicemember is engaged in active military service. The SCRA also places a cap on interest bearing obligations of servicemembers to an amount not greater than 6% per year, inclusive of all related charges and fees.

     •Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act.The Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (“HIPAA”) provides standards to protect the confidentiality of patients’ personal healthcare and financial information. Pursuant to HIPAA, business associates of health care providers, such as agencies which collect

21


healthcare receivables, must comply with certain privacy standards established by HIPAA to ensure that the information provided will be safeguarded from misuse.

     •U.S. Bankruptcy Code.In order to prevent any collection activity with bankrupt debtors by creditors and collection agencies, the U.S. Bankruptcy Code provides for an automatic stay, which prohibits certain contacts with consumers after the filing of bankruptcy petitions.

     Additionally, there are in some states statutes and regulations comparable to and in some cases more stringent than the above federal laws, and specific licensing requirements which affect the Company’sour operations. State laws may also limit credit account interest rates and the fees, as well as limit the time frame in which judicial actions may be initiated to enforce the collection of consumer accounts.

     Although the Company iswe are not a credit originator, some of these laws directed toward credit originators may occasionally affect itsour operations because itsour receivables were originated through credit transactions, such as the following laws, which apply principally to credit originators:

     • Truth in Lending Act;

     • Fair Credit Billing Act; and

•  Truth in Lending Act;
•  Fair Credit Billing Act; and
•  Equal Credit Opportunity Act.

     Federal laws which regulate credit orginiatorsoriginators require, among other things, that credit card issuers disclose to consumers the interest rates, fees, grace periods, and balance calculation methods associated with their credit card accounts. Consumers are entitled under current laws to have payments and credits applied to their accounts promptly, to receive prescribed notices, and to require billing errors to be resolved promptly. Some laws prohibit discriminatory practices in connection with the extension of credit. Federal statutes further provide that, in some cases, consumers cannot be held liable for, or their liability is limited with respect to, charges to the credit card account that were a result of an unauthorized use of credit.the credit card. These laws, among others, may give consumers a legal cause of action against the Company,us, or may limit the Company’sour ability to recover amounts owing with respect to the receivables, whether or not itwe committed any wrongful act or omission in connection with the account. If the credit originator fails to comply with applicable statutes, rules and regulations, it could create claims and rights for consumers that could reduce or eliminate their obligations to repay the account, and have a possible material adverse effect on the Company.us.

     Accordingly, when the Company acquireswe acquire defaulted consumer receivables, itwe contractually requiresrequire credit orginatorsoriginators to indemnify itus against any losses caused by their failure to comply with applicable statutes, rules and regulations relating to the receivables before they are sold to the Company.us.

     The U.S. Congress and several states are currently in the process of enacting and amendinghave enacted legislation concerning identity theft. Additional consumer protection and privacy protection laws may be enacted that would impose additional requirements on the enforcement of and recovery on consumer credit card or installment accounts. Any new laws, rules or regulations that may be adopted, or amended, as well as existing consumer protection and privacy protection laws, may adversely affect the Company’sour ability to recover the receivables. In addition, the Company’sour failure to comply with these requirements could adversely affect itsour ability to enforce the receivables.

     The CompanyWe cannot ensureassure you that some of the receivables were not established as a result of identity theft or unauthorized use of a credit card and, accordingly, the Companywe could not recover the amount of the defaulted consumer receivables. As a purchaser of defaulted consumer receivables, the Companywe may acquire receivables subject to legitimate defenses on the part of the consumer. The Company’sOur account purchase contracts allow itus to return to the Debt Sellerdebt owners certain defaulted consumer receivables that may not be collectible, due to these and other

18


circumstances. Upon return, the Debt Sellersdebt collectors are required to replace the receivables with similar receivables or repurchase the receivables. These provisions limit to some extent the Company’sour losses on such accounts.

1922


 

Item 2. Properties.

     The Company’sOur principal executive offices and primary operations facility are located in approximately 40,00065,000 square feet of leased space in two adjacent buildings in Norfolk, Virginia and the Company rents one administrative facility in Virginia Beach, Virginia that is approximately 2,500 square feet and one storage facility. This space was vacated during January 2004. The Company ownsVirginia. We own a two-acre parcel of land across from itsour headquarters which itwe developed into a parking lot for use by itsour employees. In addition, the Company ownswe own an approximately 15,000 square foot facility in Hutchinson, Kansas, thatand contiguous parcels of land which are used primarily for employee parking. The Hutchinson site can currently accommodate approximately 100 employees. The CompanyWe also leaseslease a facility located in approximately 21,000 square feet of space in Hampton, Virginia towhich can accommodate approximately 285 additional employees. This new facility openedAs a result of the IGS acquisition, since October 1, 2004 we have occupied 5,000 square feet of office space in March 2003. The Company also entered into a new lease for additional space adjacent to its Norfolk, Virginia office. This space became occupied in January 2004 and consists of 25,000 square feet. This space now accommodates all Anchor employees, accounting, outsourced collections and other administrative support personnel. The Company doesLas Vegas, Nevada. We do not consider any specific leased or owned facility to be material to itsour operations. The Company believesWe believe that equally suitable alternative facilities are available in all areas where itwe currently doesdo business.

     During December 2004, we began work on a 4,000 square foot expansion to our Hutchinson, Kansas call center. The expansion will permit us to add approximately 56 collectors and four managers to that facility. In conjunction with the expansion, we acquired an additional 4,000 square foot building and 35,000 square feet of adjacent land in order to secure parking for the expanded facility.

     During January 2005, we signed a new lease for a 13,500 square foot call center in Las Vegas, Nevada. This site is currently undergoing tenant improvements and will house our IGS operation. In the second quarter of 2005, we anticipate moving from the existing 5,000 square foot facility into this new one. Our lease obligation on the existing 5,000 square foot facility will end at that time.

Item 3. Legal Proceedings.

     From time to time, the Company iswe are involved in various legal proceedings which are incidental to the ordinary course of itsour business. The CompanyWe regularly initiatesinitiate lawsuits against consumers and isare occasionally countersued by them in such actions. Also, consumers occasionally initiate litigation against the Company,us, in which they allege that it haswe have violated a state or federal law in the process of collecting on theiran account. The Company doesWe do not believe that these routine matters represent a substantial volume of itsour accounts or that, individually or in the aggregate, they are material to itsour business or financial condition.

     The Company isWe are not a party to any material legal proceedings and it iswe are unaware of any contemplated material actions against it.us.

Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Securityholders.

     None.

2023


 

PART II

Item 5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, and Related Stockholder Matters.Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities.

Price Range of Common Stock

     The Company’s     Our common stock (“Common Stock”) began trading on the Nasdaq National Market under the symbol “PRAA” on November 8, 2002. Prior to that time there was no public trading market for the Company’sour common stock. The following table sets forth the high and low sales price for the Common Stock, as reported by the Nasdaq National Market, for the periods indicated.

        
 High Low        
 
 
 High Low 
2002
2002
  
Quarter ended December 31, 2002 $20.50 $14.75 
Quarter ended December 31, 2002 $20.50 $14.75 
2003
2003
  
Quarter ended March 31, 2003 $25.00 $17.76 
Quarter ended June 30, 2003 $33.95 $20.40 
Quarter ended September 30, 2003 $32.50 $24.30 
Quarter ended December 31, 2003 $30.61 $22.55 
Quarter ended March 31, 2003 $25.00 $17.76 
Quarter ended June 30, 2003 $33.95 $20.40 
Quarter ended September 30, 2003 $32.50 $24.30 
Quarter ended December 31, 2003 $30.61 $22.55 
2004
 
Quarter ended March 31, 2004 $28.63 $23.89 
Quarter ended June 30, 2004 $29.53 $24.06 
Quarter ended September 30, 2004 $30.05 $25.16 
Quarter ended December 31, 2004 $41.80 $29.10 

     As of February 12, 2004,16, 2005, there were 3025 holders of record of the Common Stock. Based on information provided by the Company’sour transfer agent and registrar, the Company believeswe believe that there are 9,62315,128 beneficial owners of the Common Stock.

Shares Registered After Initial Public Offering

     A secondary offering of our shares of common stock of the Company was completed on May 21, 2003, in which 4,025,000 shares were sold. After this transaction, holders of 6,865,261 shares ofsold (including the Common Stock which were not sold in the secondary offering agreed to a 180-day “lock-up” with respect to these shares, which restricted their ability to sell these shares during the 180 days following the date of the prospectus, or until November 21, 2003. These shares may now be sold in accordance with the provisions of the federal securities laws, including Rule 144.overallotment option.)

     On November 7, 2003, the Companywe filed two Registration Statements with the Securities and Exchange Commission, both of which were filed on Form S-8, to register (a) the 2,000,000 shares of the Common Stock underlying the Company’sour 2002 Employee Stock Option Plan and (b) 142,500 shares of the Common Stock underlying Warrants held by certain of our key employeesemployees.

     A secondary offering of our shares of common stock was completed on November 17, 2004, in which 1,955,000 shares (including the overallotment option) were sold by existing stockholders. The registration of these shares was completed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on Form S-3. We did not receive any of the Company.proceeds from the sale of these shares. All offering related expenses were paid by the selling shareholders. Holders of 3,999,599 shares of our common stock which were not sold in the secondary offering agreed to a 90-day “lock-up” with respect to these shares, which restricted their ability to sell these shares during the 90 days following the date of the prospectus, or until February 17, 2005. These shares may now be sold in accordance with the provisions of the federal securities laws, including Rule 144.

24


Dividend Policy

     The Company’sOur board of directors sets itsour dividend policy. The Company doesWe do not pay dividends on the Common Stock; however, the Company’sour board of directors may determine in the future to declare or pay cash dividends on the Common Stock. Any future determination as to the declaration and payment of dividends will be at the discretion of the Company’sour board of directors and will depend on then existing conditions, including the Company’sour financial condition, results of operations, contractual restrictions, capital requirements, business prospects and other factors that the Company’sour board of directors may consider relevant.

21


Item 6. Selected Financial Data.

The following selected financial data should be read in conjunction with the audited financial statements.

             
 Year Ended December 31,
 
 2003 2002 2001 2000 1999                    
 
 
 
 
 
 Year Ended December 31, 
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
  2004 2003 2002 2001 2000 
STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS DATA: 
INCOME STATEMENT DATA:
 
Revenue:Revenue:  
Income recognized on finance receivables $106,254 $81,796 $53,803 $31,221 $18,991 
Commissions 7,142 3,131 1,944 214  
Net gain on cash sales of defaulted consumer receivables   100 901 343 
Income recognized on finance receivables $81,796 $53,803 $31,221 $18,991 $11,746            
Commissions 3,131 1,944 214   
Net gain on cash sales of defaulted consumer receivables  100 901 343 322 
  
 
 
 
 
 
Total revenue 84,927 55,847 32,336 19,334 12,068 
Total revenue 113,396 84,927 55,847 32,336 19,334 
  
 
 
 
 
            
Operating expenses:Operating expenses:  
Compensation and employee services 28,987 21,701 15,644 9,883 6,119 
Outside legal and other fees and services 14,147 8,093 3,627 2,583 1,493 
Communications 2,772 1,915 1,645 871 553 
Rent and occupancy 1,189 799 712 603 335 
Other operating expenses 1,932 1,436 1,265 652 498 
Depreciation 1,445 940 677 437 369 
Compensation and employee services 36,620 28,987 21,701 15,644 9,883 
Outside legal and other fees and services 21,408 14,147 8,093 3,627 2,583 
Communications 3,638 2,772 1,915 1,645 871 
Rent and occupancy 1,745 1,189 799 712 603 
Other operating expenses 2,712 1,932 1,436 1,265 652 
Depreciation and amortization 2,383 1,445 940 677 437 
  
 
 
 
 
            
Total operating expensesTotal operating expenses 50,472 34,884 23,570 15,029 9,367  68,506 50,472 34,884 23,570 15,029 
  
 
 
 
 
            
Income from operationsIncome from operations 34,455 20,963 8,766 4,305 2,701  44,890 34,455 20,963 8,766 4,305 
Loss on extinguishment of debtLoss on extinguishment of debt    (424)        (424)  
Net interest expensesNet interest expenses 542 2,425 2,716 1,765 876  51 542 2,425 2,716 1,765 
  
 
 
 
 
            
Income before income taxesIncome before income taxes 33,913 18,538 5,626 2,540 1,825  44,839 33,913 18,538 5,626 2,540 
Provision for income taxesProvision for income taxes 13,199 1,473     17,388 13,199 1,473   
  
 
 
 
 
            
Net income(1)
Net income(1)
 $20,714 17,065 5,626 2,540 1,825  $27,451 $20,714 17,065 5,626 2,540 
  
      
Pro forma income taxes 5,694 2,100 901 697 
Pro forma income taxes (unaudited)(2)
 5,694 2,100 901 
  
 
 
 
        
Pro forma net income(2)
 $11,371 $3,526 $1,639 $1,128 
  
 
 
 
 
Pro forma net income per share(3)
      
Pro forma net income (unaudited)(2)
 $11,371 $3,526 $1,639 
Basic $1.42 $1.08 $0.35 $0.16 $0.11        
Diluted $1.32 $0.94 $0.31 $0.14 $0.11  
Pro forma weighted average shares(3)
      
Basic 14,546 10,529 10,000 10,000 10,000 
Diluted 15,712 12,066 11,458 11,366 10,000 
Net income per share 
Basic $1.79 $1.42 
Diluted $1.73 $1.32 
Pro forma net income per share (unaudited)(3)
 
Basic $1.08 $0.35 $0.16 
Diluted $0.94 $0.31 $0.14 
Weighted average shares(3)
 
Basic 15,357 14,546 10,529 10,000 10,000 
Diluted 15,853 15,712 12,066 11,458 11,366 
OPERATING AND OTHER FINANCIAL DATA:OPERATING AND OTHER FINANCIAL DATA:  
Cash collections and commission(4)
 $120,183 $81,198 $53,362 $30,733 $17,362 
Cash collections and commissions(4)
 $160,546 $120,183 $81,198 $53,362 $30,733 
Operating expenses to cash collections and commissionsOperating expenses to cash collections and commissions  42%  43%  44%  49%  54%  43%  42%  43%  44%  49%
Acquisitions of finance receivables, at cost $61,815 $42,382 $33,381 $24,663 $19,417 
Acquisitions of finance receivables, at cost(5)
 $61,165 $61,815 $42,382 $33,381 $24,663 
Acquisitions of finance receivables, at face valueAcquisitions of finance receivables, at face value $2,229,682 $1,966,296 $1,592,353 $1,004,114 $479,778  $3,340,434 $2,229,682 $1,966,296 $1,592,353 $1,004,114 
Percentage increase of acquisitions of finance receivables, at cost  46%  27%  35%  27%  69%
Percentage increase in cash collections and commissions  48%  52%  74%  77%  60%
Percentage increase in pro forma net income  82%  222%  115%  45%  181%
Employees at period end:Employees at period end:  
Total employees 798 581 501 370 246 
Ratio of collection personnel to total employees(5)
  90%  88%  90%  89%  86%
Total employees 948 798 581 501 370 
Ratio of collection personnel to total employees(6)
  89%  90%  88%  90%  89%


(1) At the time of the Company’sour initial public offering, which commenced on November 8, 2002, the Companywe changed itsour legal structure from a limited liability company to a corporation. As a limited liability company the Company waswe were not subject to Federal or state corporate income taxes. Therefore, net income does not give effect to taxes for all periods prior to the Company’sour initial public offering.
 
(2) For comparison purposes, the Company hasfor periods prior to 2003 we have presented pro forma net income, which reflects income taxes assuming the Companywe had been a corporation since the time of the Company’sour formation and assuming tax rates equal to the rates that would have been in effect had the Companywe been required to report tax expenseexpenses in such years. Since the time of the Company’s reorganization,The pro forma income taxes and pro forma net income reflects its actualinformation are unaudited. We believe that pro

25


forma net income.income for periods prior to 2003 may be compared to net income for the 2003 and 2004 periods.
 
(3) ProFor periods prior to 2003, pro forma net income per share and pro forma weighted average shares assumes the Company had reorganized as a corporation since the beginning of the period presented. The pro forma net income per share information is unaudited. For the 2003 and 2004 periods, pro forma net income per share is the actual net income per share for the period presented.
 
(4) Includes both cash collected on finance receivables and commission feefees received during the relevant period.
 
(5) Represents cash paid for finance receivables. It does not include certain capitalized costs or purchase price refunded by the seller due to the return of non-compliant accounts (also defined as buybacks). Non- compliant refers to the contractual representations and warranties provided for in the purchase and sale contract between the seller and us. These representations and warranties from the sellers generally cover account holders’ death or bankruptcy and accounts settled or disputed prior to sale. The seller can replace or repurchase these accounts.
(6)Includes all collectors and all first-line collection supervisors.supervisors at December 31.

22


Below is listed some key balance sheet data for the periods presented:

                     
  Year Ended December 31, 2003
  
  2003 2002 2001 2000 1999
  
 
 
 
 
(Dollars in thousands)
                    
FINANCIAL POSITION DATA:                    
Cash and cash equivalents $24,912  $17,939  $4,780  $3,191  $1,456 
Finance receivables, net  92,569   65,526   47,987   41,124   28,139 
Total assets  126,394   88,288   57,108   47,188   31,495 
Long-term debt  1,657   966   568   532    
Total debt, including capital lease obligations  2,208   1,465   26,771   23,300   10,372 
Total stockholders’ equity  119,148   80,608   27,752   22,705   20,313 
                                  
   For the Quarter Ended,
   
   Dec. 31, Sept. 30, June 30, Mar. 31, Dec. 31, Sept. 30, June 30, Mar. 31,
   2003 2003 2003 2003 2002 2002 2002 2002
   
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
                                
STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS DATA:                                
Revenue:                                
 Income recognized on finance receivables $22,172  $21,389  $20,618  $17,618  $15,081  $14,704  $12,837  $11,181 
 Commissions  864   784   785   698   607   521   440   376 
 Net gain on cash sales of defaulted consumer receivables                    100    
  
 Total revenue  23,036   22,173   21,403   18,316   15,688   15,225   13,377   11,557 
  
Operating expenses:                                
 Compensation and employee services  7,545   7,370   7,679   6,393   5,981   5,508   5,144   5,068 
 Outside legal and other fees and services  4,168   3,886   3,276   2,817   2,655   2,197   1,951   1,290 
 Communications  769   702   667   634   445   540   479   451 
 Rent and occupancy  317   317   310   245   228   209   189   173 
 Other operating expenses  610   393   456   473   436   324   370   306 
 Depreciation  391   383   371   300   264   242   223   211 
  
Total operating expenses  13,800   13,051   12,759   10,862   10,009   9,020   8,356   7,499 
  
Income from operations  9,236   9,122   8,644   7,453   5,679   6,205   5,021   4,058 
Net interest expenses  327   83   75   56   244   1,066   589   526 
  
Income before income taxes  8,908   9,038   8,569   7,397   5,435   5,139   4,432   3,532 
Provision for income taxes  3,467   3,509   3,324   2,899   1,473          
  
Net income(1)
 $5,441  $5,529  $5,245  $4,498   3,962   5,139   4,432   3,532 
  
                
Pro forma income taxes                  628   1,986   1,714   1,365 
                  
Pro forma net income(2)
                 $3,334  $3,153  $2,718  $2,167 
                  
    
Pro forma net income per share(3)
                                
 Basic $0.36  $0.36  $0.37  $0.33  $0.28  $0.32  $0.27  $0.22 
 Diluted $0.35  $0.35  $0.33  $0.29  $0.24  $0.27  $0.24  $0.19 
Pro forma weighted average shares(3)
                                
 Basic  15,249   15,149   14,241   13,545   12,063   10,000   10,000   10,000 
 Diluted  15,756   15,751   15,750   15,590   13,796   11,496   11,487   11,485 

23


                                  
   Quarter Ended
   
   Dec. 31, Sept. 30, June 30, Mar. 31, Dec. 31, Sept. 30, June 30, Mar. 31,
   2003 2003 2003 2003 2002 2002 2002 2002
   
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
(Dollars in thousands)
                                
FINANCIAL POSITION DATA:                                
Assets                                
 Cash and cash equivalents $24,912  $14,810  $7,979  $12,072  $17,939  $6,038  $8,323  $7,497 
 Finance receivables, net  92,569   89,836   86,689   74,418   65,526   55,133   51,055   46,825 
 Property and equipment, net  5,166   5,233   5,059   4,996   3,794   3,667   3,433   3,376 
 Deferred tax asset  2,009   5,414   8,915                
 Income tax receivable  352   1,856   2,122                
 Other assets  1,386   1,122   1,304   1,211   1,029   651   645   935 
  
 Total assets $126,394  $118,271  $112,068  $92,697  $88,288  $65,489  $63,456  $58,633 
  
   
Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity                                
Liabilities                                
 Accounts payable $1,291  $1,132  $1,314  $861  $1,370  $697  $570  $540 
 Accrued expenses  514   599   353   333   760   660   623   681 
 Income taxes payable           2,603   937          
 Accrued payroll and bonuses  3,233   2,383   2,351   1,495   2,861   1,861   1,660   930 
 Deferred tax liability           368   287          
 Revolving lines of credit                 25,000   25,000   25,000 
 Long-term debt  1,657   1,744   1,829   925   966   1,006   1,031   1,050 
 Obligations under capital lease  551   634   540   618   499   582   675   770 
 Basis — swap contract                    434 �� 273 
  
 Total liabilities  7,246   6,492   6,387   7,203   7,680   29,806   29,993   29,244 
   
Stockholders’ equity                                
 Common stock  153   152   151   136   135          
 Additional paid in capital  96,118   94,191   93,623   78,696   78,309          
 
Members’ equity(4)
                 35,683   33,897   29,662 
 Retained earnings  22,877   17,436   11,907   6,662   2,164          
 Accumulated other comprehensive income                    (434)  (273)
  
 Total stockholders’ equity  119,148   111,779   105,681   85,494   80,608   35,683   33,463   29,389 
  
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity $126,394  $118,271  $112,068  $92,697  $88,288  $65,489  $63,456  $58,633 
  
                     
  As of December 31, 
(Dollars in thousands) 2004  2003  2002  2001  2000 
BALANCE SHEET DATA:
                    
Cash and cash equivalents $24,513  $24,912  $11,989  $4,780  $3,191 
Investments(1)
  23,950      5,950       
Finance receivables, net  105,189   92,569   65,526   47,987   41,124 
Total assets  175,176   126,394   88,288   57,108   47,188 
Long-term debt  1,924   1,657   966   568   532 
Total debt, including capital lease obligations  2,501   2,208   1,465   26,771   23,300 
Total stockholders’ equity  151,389   119,148   80,608   27,752   22,705 


(1) AtInvestment balances were previously reported as cash and cash equivalents for the time of the Company’s initial public offering, which commenced on November 8, 2002, the Company changed its legal structure from a limited liability company to a corporation. As a limited liability company the Company was not subject to federal or state corporate income taxes. Therefore, net income does not give effect to taxes for all periods prior to the Company’s initial public offering.
(2)For comparison purposes, the Company has presented pro forma net income, which reflects income taxes assuming the Company had been a corporation since the time of the Company’s formation and assuming tax rates equal to the rates that would have been in effect had the Company been required to report tax expense in such years. Since the time of the Company’s reorganization, pro forma net income reflects its actual net income.
(3)Pro forma net income per share and pro forma weighted average shares assumes the Company had reorganized as a corporation since the beginning of the period presented.
(4)For periods prior to December 31, 2002, the Company was a limited liability company and the equity of the Company is contained in the line item “Members’ equity”.

24Below is listed the quarterly income statements for the years ended December 31, 2004 and 2003:

                                 
              For the Quarter Ended,          
  Dec. 31,  Sept. 30,  June 30,  Mar. 31,  Dec. 31,  Sept. 30,  June 30,  Mar. 31, 
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data) 2004  2004  2004  2004  2003  2003  2003  2003 
INCOME STATEMENT DATA:
                                
Revenue:                                
Income recognized on finance receivables $28,387  $27,070  $26,890  $23,908  $22,172  $21,389  $20,618  $17,618 
Commissions  3,315   1,216   1,254   1,357   864   784   785   698 
   
Total revenue  31,702   28,286   28,144   25,265   23,036   22,173   21,403   18,316 
   
Operating expenses:                                
Compensation and employee services  9,717   9,155   9,211   8,537   7,545   7,370   7,679   6,393 
Outside legal and other fees and services  6,369   5,348   5,450   4,241   4,168   3,886   3,276   2,817 
Communications  980   840   811   1,008   769   702   667   634 
Rent and occupancy  448   434   433   429   317   317   310   245 
Other operating expenses  684   649   689   691   610   393   456   473 
Depreciation and amortization  985   488   463   448   391   383   371   301 
   
Total operating expenses  19,183   16,914   17,057   15,354   13,800   13,051   12,759   10,863 
   
Income from operations  12,519   11,372   11,087   9,911   9,236   9,122   8,644   7,453 
Net interest income (expense)  50   8   (43)  (65)  (328)  (84)  (75)  (56)
   
Income before income taxes  12,569   11,380   11,044   9,846   8,908   9,038   8,569   7,397 
Provision for income taxes  4,854   4,405   4,294   3,835   3,467   3,509   3,324   2,899 
   
Net income $7,715  $6,975  $6,750  $6,011  $5,441  $5,529  $5,245  $4,498 
   
                                 
Net income per share                                
Basic $0.50  $0.45  $0.44  $0.39  $0.36  $0.36  $0.37  $0.33 
Diluted $0.48  $0.44  $0.43  $0.38  $0.35  $0.35  $0.33  $0.29 
Weighted average shares                                
Basic  15,462   15,342   15,322   15,304   15,249   15,149   14,241   13,545 
Diluted  16,030   15,832   15,776   15,774   15,756   15,751   15,750   15,590 

26


 

Below is listed the quarterly Balance Sheet for the years ended December 31, 2004 and 2003:

                                 
  Quarter Ended 
  Dec. 31,  Sept. 30,  June 30,  Mar. 31,  Dec. 31,  Sept. 30,  June 30,  Mar. 31, 
(Dollars in thousands) 2004  2004  2004  2004  2003  2003  2003  2003 
BALANCE SHEET DATA:
                                
Assets
                                
Cash and cash equivalents $24,513  $35,815  $27,402  $29,691  $24,912  $14,810  $7,979  $10,122 
Investments(1)
  23,950   20,950   14,950               1,950 
Finance receivables, net  105,189   95,312   96,270   95,628   92,569   89,836   86,689   74,418 
Property and equipment, net  5,752   6,033   6,022   5,878   5,166   5,233   5,059   4,996 
Deferred tax asset              2,009   5,414   8,915    
Income tax receivable        147   357   352   1,856   2,122    
Goodwill  6,397                      
Intangible assets, net  6,319                      
Other assets  3,056   827   1,333   1,476   1,386   1,122   1,304   1,211 
   
Total assets $175,176  $158,937  $146,124  $133,030  $126,394  $118,271  $112,068  $92,697 
   
 
Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity
                                
Liabilities                                
Accounts payable $1,414  $1,176  $1,049  $656  $1,291  $1,132  $1,314  $861 
Accrued expenses  1,563   1,213   557   392   514   599   353   333 
Income taxes payable  182   148                  2,603 
Accrued payroll and bonuses  4,476   3,916   3,404   1,697   3,233   2,383   2,351   1,495 
Deferred tax liability  13,651   9,719   5,631   1,676            368 
Long-term debt  1,924   2,050   2,174   2,296   1,657   1,744   1,829   925 
Obligations under capital lease  576   627   679   755   551   634   540   618 
   
Total liabilities  23,786   18,849   13,494   7,472   7,246   6,492   6,387   7,203 
 
Stockholders’ equity                                
Common stock  155   154   153   153   153   152   151   136 
Additional paid in capital  100,906   97,321   96,839   96,517   96,118   94,191   93,623   78,696 
Retained earnings  50,329   42,613   35,638   28,888   22,877   17,436   11,907   6,662 
   
Total stockholders’ equity  151,390   140,088   132,630   125,558   119,148   111,779   105,681   85,494 
   
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity $175,176  $158,937  $146,124  $133,030  $126,394  $118,271  $112,068  $92,697 
   


(1)Investment balances were previously reported as cash and cash equivalents for the periods presented.

27


Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.

Results of Operations

     The following table sets forth certain operating data in dollars and as a percentage of total revenue for the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003 2002 and 2001:2002:

                 
 2003 2002 2001                        
             2004 2003 2002 
Revenue:Revenue:  
Income recognized on finance receivables $106,254,441  93.7% $81,796,209  96.3% $53,802,718  96.3%
Commissions 7,141,796 6.3 3,131,054 3.7 1,944,428 3.5 
Net gain on cash sales of defaulted consumer receivables  0.0  0.0 100,156 0.2 
Income recognized on finance receivables $81,796,209  96.3% $53,802,718  96.3% $31,220,857  96.6%  
Total revenue 113,396,237 100.0 84,927,263 100.0 55,847,302 100.0 
Operating expenses: 
Compensation and employee services 36,620,054 32.3 28,986,795 34.1 21,700,918 38.9 
Outside legal and other fees and services 21,407,570 18.9 14,147,394 16.7 8,092,460 14.5 
Communications 3,638,144 3.2 2,772,110 3.3 1,914,557 3.4 
Rent and occupancy 1,744,885 1.5 1,189,379 1.4 799,323 1.4 
Other operating expenses 2,712,463 2.4 1,932,055 2.3 1,436,438 2.6 
Depreciation and amortization 2,382,896 2.1 1,444,825 1.7 940,352 1.7 
Commissions 3,131,054  3.7% 1,944,428  3.5% 214,539  0.7%  
Total operating expenses 68,506,012 60.4 50,472,558 59.4 34,884,048 62.5 
Net gain on cash sales of defaulted consumer receivables   0.0% 100,156  0.2% 900,916  2.8%  
Income from operations 44,890,225 39.6 34,454,705 40.6 20,963,254 37.5 
Interest income 222,718 0.2 60,173 0.1 21,548 0.0 
Interest expense  (273,355)  (0.2)  (602,072)  (0.7)  (2,446,620)  (4.4)
 
  
Income before income taxes 44,839,588 39.5 33,912,806 39.9 18,538,182 33.2 
Provision for income taxes 17,388,148 15.3 13,199,303 15.5 1,473,073 2.6 
Total revenue 84,927,263  100.0% 55,847,302  100.0% 32,336,312  100.0%  
Operating expenses: 
Net income $27,451,440  24.2% $20,713,503  24.4% $17,065,109 30.6 
 Compensation and employee services 28,986,795  34.1% 21,700,918  38.9% 15,644,460  48.4%   
Pro forma income taxes (unaudited)(1)
 5,693,788 10.2 
 Outside legal and other fees and services 14,147,394  16.7% 8,092,460  14.5% 3,627,135  11.2%     
Pro forma net income (unaudited)(1)
 $11,371,321  20.4%
 Communications 2,772,110  3.3% 1,914,557  3.4% 1,644,557  5.1%     
 Rent and occupancy 1,189,379  1.4% 799,323  1.4% 712,400  2.2%
 Other operating expenses 1,932,055  2.3% 1,436,438  2.6% 1,265,132  3.9%
 Depreciation 1,444,825  1.7% 940,352  1.7% 676,677  2.1%
 
Total operating expenses 50,472,558  59.4% 34,884,048  62.5% 23,570,361  72.9%
 
Income from operations 34,454,705  40.6% 20,963,254  37.5% 8,765,951  27.1%
Interest income 60,173  0.1% 21,548  0.0% 65,362  0.2%
Loss on extinguishment of debt   0.0%   0.0%  (423,305)  -1.3%
Interest expenses  (602,072)  -0.7%  (2,446,620)  -4.4%  (2,781,674)  -8.6%
 
Income before income taxes 33,912,806  39.9% 18,538,182  33.2% 5,626,334  17.4%
Provision for income taxes 13,199,303  15.5% 1,473,073  2.6%   0.0%
 
Net income $20,713,503  24.4% $17,065,109  30.6% $5,626,334  17.4%
 
 
Pro forma income taxes 5,693,788  10.2% 2,100,609  6.5%
 
Pro forma net income(1)
 $11,371,321  20.4% $3,525,725  10.9%
 


(1) During 2001 and most of 2002 the Company’sour legal structure was a limited liability company. As a limited liability company the Company waswe were not subject to federal or state corporate income taxes. For comparison purposes, pro forma net income is presented, which reflects income taxes assuming the Companywe had been a corporation since the time of its formation and assuming tax rates equal to the rates that would have been in effect had the Companywe been required to report tax expense in such years.

Year Ended December 31, 2004 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 2003

Revenue

     Total revenue was $113.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2004, an increase of $28.5 million or 33.6% compared to total revenue of $84.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2003.

Income Recognized on Finance Receivables

     Income recognized on finance receivables under the guidance of Practice Bulletin 6, was $106.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2004, an increase of $24.5 million or 30.0% compared to income recognized on finance receivables of $81.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2003. The majority of the increase was due to an increase in our cash collections on our owned defaulted consumer receivables to $153.4 million from $117.1 million, an increase of 31.0%. Our amortization rate on owned portfolios for the year ended December 31, 2004 was 30.7% while for the year ended December 31, 2003 it was 30.1%. During the year ended December 31, 2004, we acquired defaulted consumer receivables portfolios with an aggregate face value amount of $3.3 billion at an original purchase price of $61.2 million. During the year ended December 31, 2003, we acquired defaulted consumer receivable portfolios with an aggregate face value of $2.2 billion at an original purchase price of $61.8 million. Our relative cost of acquiring defaulted consumer receivable portfolios decreased to 1.83% of face value for the year ended December 31, 2004 from 2.77% of face value for the year ended December 31, 2003. As a percentage of total face acquired in 2004, we purchased 1.4% fresh, 14.1% primary, 8.6% secondary, 41.1% tertiary, and 34.8% other, while in 2003 we purchased 2.5% fresh, 24.6% primary, 41.3% secondary, 17.9% tertiary and 13.7% other. In any period, we acquire defaulted consumer receivables that can vary dramatically in

28


their age, type and ultimate collectibility. We may pay significantly different purchase rates for purchased receivables within any period as a result of this quality fluctuation. As a result, the average purchase rate paid for any given period can fluctuate dramatically based on our particular buying activity in that period. During the year ended December 31, 2004, we bought a higher concentration of older, lower priced portfolios, which resulted in a lower purchase price when compared to the year ended December 31, 2003. However, regardless of the average purchase price, we intend to target a similar internal rate of return in pricing its portfolio acquisitions; therefore, the absolute rate paid is not necessarily relevant to estimated profitability of a period’s buying.

Commissions

     Commissions were $7.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2004, an increase of $4.0 million or 129.0% compared to commissions of $3.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2003. Included in commissions are fees earned by our contingent fee subsidiary (Anchor), and in the fourth quarter of 2004 fees earned by our newly acquired skip tracing business (IGS). The increase from Anchor is related to a growing inventory of accounts.

Net gain on cash sales of defaulted consumer receivables

     Net gain on cash sales, recognized under the guidance of FAS 140, of defaulted consumer receivables was $0 for both the years ended December 31, 2004 and December 31, 2003. We retained our accounts for our collection.

Operating Expenses

     Total operating expenses were $68.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2004, an increase of $18.0 million or 35.6% compared to total operating expenses of $50.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2003. Total operating expenses, including compensation expenses, were 42.7% of cash receipts excluding sales for the year ended December 31, 2004 compared with 42.0% for the same period in 2003.

Compensation and Employee Services

     Compensation and employee services expenses were $36.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2004, an increase of $7.6 million or 26.2% compared to compensation and employee services expenses of $29.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2003. Compensation and employee services expenses increased as total employees grew from 798 at December 31, 2003 to 948 at December 31, 2004. Additionally, existing employees received normal salary increases. Compensation and employee services expenses as a percentage of cash receipts excluding sales decreased to 22.8% for the year ended December 31, 2004 from 24.1% of cash receipts excluding sales for the same period in 2003.

Outside Legal and Other Fees and Services

     Outside legal and other fees and services expenses were $21.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2004, an increase of $7.3 million or 51.8% compared to outside legal and other fees and services expenses of $14.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2003. The increase was attributable to the increased cash collections resulting from the increased number of accounts placed with independent contingent fee attorneys. This increase is consistent with the growth we experienced in our portfolio of defaulted consumer receivables and a portfolio management strategy implemented in mid 2002. This strategy resulted in us referring to the legal suit process more unsuccessfully liquidated accounts that have an identified means of repayment but that are nearing their legal statute of limitations, than had been referred historically. Legal cash collections represented 30.2% of total cash collections for the year ended December 31, 2004, up from 26.0% for the year ended December 31, 2003. Total legal expenses for the year ended December 31, 2004 were 34.5% of legal cash collections compared to 35.7% for the year ended December 31, 2003.

Communications

     Communications expenses were $3.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2004, an increase of $800,000 or 28.6% compared to communications expenses of $2.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2003.

29


The increase was attributable to growth in mailings and higher telephone expenses incurred to collect on a greater number of defaulted consumer receivables owned and serviced. Mailings were responsible for 80.3% of this increase, while the remaining 19.7% was attributable to higher phone charges.

Rent and Occupancy

     Rent and occupancy expenses were $1.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2004, an increase of $500,000 or 41.7% compared to rent and occupancy expenses of $1.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2003. The increase was attributable to increased leased space due to the opening of a call center in Hampton, Virginia in March 2003 and at our new Norfolk, Virginia location which opened in January 2004. Of the $500,000 increase in 2004, the new Hampton call center accounted for $59,000 of the increase, the new Norfolk location accounted for $449,000 of the increase and the new IGS location accounted for $23,000 of the increase offset by a decrease of $31,000 related to the Virginia Beach, Virginia administrative space that was vacated in January 2004.

Other Operating Expenses

     Other operating expenses were $2.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2004, an increase of $800,000 or 42.1% compared to other operating expenses of $1.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2003. The increase was due to increases in repairs and maintenance, taxes, fees and, licenses and insurance expenses. Repairs and maintenance expenses increased by $80,000, taxes, fees and, licenses increased by $237,000, insurance expense increased by $454,000, and other expense items increased by $29,000.

Depreciation and Amortization

     Depreciation and amortization expenses were $2.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2004, an increase of $1.0 million or 71.4% compared to depreciation and amortization expenses of $1.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2003. The increase was attributable to the depreciation and amortization of the acquired assets of IGS and the continued capital expenditures on equipment, software and computers related to our growth and systems upgrades. The amortization of the IGS intangible assets accounted for $481,000 of the increase while the remaining increase of $519,000 resulted from continued capital expenditures on equipment, software and computers.

Interest Income

     Interest income was $223,000 for the year ended December 31, 2004, an increase of $163,000 or 271.7% compared to interest income of $60,000 for the year ended December 31, 2003. These amounts are the result of investing in tax-exempt auction rate certificates in 2003 and 2004. The increase is due to larger invested balances in 2004 than in 2003 as well as a higher rate of return.

Interest Expense

     Interest expense was $273,000 for the year ended December 31, 2004, a decrease of $327,000 or 54.5% compared to interest expense of $600,000 for the year ended December 31, 2003. The decrease is due to a lower unused line fee under the new revolving credit arrangement. In addition, with the termination of a revolving line of credit, we wrote off $284,000 in the fourth quarter of 2003.

30


Year Ended December 31, 2003 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 2002

Revenue

     Total revenue was $84.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2003, an increase of $29.1 million or 52.2% compared to total revenue of $55.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2002.

Income Recognized on Finance Receivables

     Income recognized on finance receivables, recognized under the guidance of Practice Bulletin 6, was $81.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2003, an increase of $28.0 million or 52.0% compared to income recognized on finance receivables of $53.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2002. The majority of the increase was due to an increase in the Company’sour cash collections on itsour owned defaulted consumer receivables to $117.1 million from $79.3 million, an increase of 47.7%. The Company’sOur amortization rate on owned portfolios for the year ended December 31, 2003 was 30.1% while for the year ended December 31, 2002 it was 32.1%. During the year ended December 31, 2003, the Companywe acquired defaulted consumer receivables portfolios with an aggregate face value amount of $2.2 billion at an original purchase price of $61.8 million. During the year ended December 31, 2002, the Companywe acquired defaulted consumer receivable portfolios with an aggregate face value of $2.0 billion at an original purchase price of $42.4 million. The Company’sOur relative cost of acquiring defaulted consumer receivable portfolios increased to 2.8% of face value for the year ended December 31, 2003 from 2.2% of face value for the year ended December 31, 2002. As a percentage of total face acquired in 2003, the Companywe purchased 2.5% fresh, 24.6% primary,

25


41.3% secondary, 17.9% tertiary, and 13.7% other, while in 2002 the Companywe purchased 7.5% fresh, 13.2% primary, 35.1% secondary, 39.6% tertiary and 4.6% other. In any period, we acquire defaulted consumer receivables that can vary dramatically in their age, type and ultimate collectibility. We may pay significantly different purchase rates for purchased receivables within any period as a result of this quality fluctuation. As a result, the average purchase rate paid for any given period can fluctuate dramatically based on our particular buying activity in that period. During the year ended December 31, 2003, we bought a higher concentration of newer, higher priced portfolios, which resulted in a higher purchase price when compared to the year ended December 31, 2002. However, regardless of the average purchase price, we intend to target a similar internal rate of return in pricing its portfolio acquisitions; therefore, the absolute rate paid is not necessarily relevant to the estimated profitability of a portfolio.

Commissions

     Commissions were $3.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2003, an increase of $1.2 million or 63.2% compared to commissions of $1.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2002. Commissions increased as a result of a growing inventory of accounts.

Net gain on cash sales of defaulted consumer receivables

     Net gain on cash sales, recognized under the guidance of FAS 140, of defaulted consumer receivables were $0 for the year ended December 31, 2003, a decrease of $100,000 or 100.0% compared to net gain on cash sales of defaulted consumer receivables of $100,000 for the year ended December 31, 2002, which was derived from one sale in June 2002.

Operating Expenses

     Total operating expenses were $50.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2003, an increase of $15.6 million or 44.7% compared to total operating expenses of $34.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2002. Total operating expenses, including compensation expenses, were 42.0% of cash receipts excluding sales for the year ended December 31, 2003 compared with 43.0% for the same period in 2002.

31


Compensation and Employee Services

     Compensation and employee services expenses were $29.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2003, an increase of $7.3 million or 33.6% compared to compensation and employee services expenses of $21.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2002. Compensation and employee services expenses increased as total employees grew from 581 at December 31, 2002 to 798 at December 31, 2003. Additionally, existing employees received normal salary increases. Compensation and employee services expenses as a percentage of cash receipts excluding sales decreased to 24.1% for the year ended December 31, 2003 from 26.7% of cash receipts excluding sales for the same period in 2002.2002.

Outside Legal and Other Fees and Services

     Outside legal and other fees and services expenses were $14.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2003, an increase of $6.0 million or 74.1% compared to outside legal and other fees and services expenses of $8.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2002. The increase was attributable to the increased cash collections resulting from the increased number of accounts referred toplaced with independent contingent fee attorneys. This increase is consistent with the growth the Companywe experienced in itsour portfolio of defaulted consumer receivables and a portfolio management strategy implemented in mid 2002. This strategy resulted in the Companyus referring to the legal suit process more unsuccessfully liquidated accounts that have an identified means of repayment but that are nearing their legal statute of limitations, than had been referred historically. Legal cash collections represented 26.0% of total cash collections for the year ended December 31, 2003, up from 19.5% for the year ended December 31, 2002. Total legal expenses for the year ended December 31, 2003 were 35.7% of legal cash collections compared to 38.4% for the year ended December 31, 2002.

Communications

     Communications expenses were $2.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2003, an increase of $900,000 or 47.4% compared to communications expenses of $1.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2002. The increase was attributable to growth in mailings and higher telephone expenses incurred to collect on a greater number of defaulted consumer receivables owned and serviced. Mailings were responsible for 52.2% of this increase, while the remaining 47.8% was attributable to higher phone charges.

26


Rent and Occupancy

     Rent and occupancy expenses were $1.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2003, an increase of $401,000 or 50.2% compared to rent and occupancy expenses of $799,000 for the year ended December 31, 2002. The increase was attributable to increased leased space due to the opening of a call center in Hampton, Virginia, a storage facility, an off-site administrative and mail handling site and contractual increases in annual rental rates. The Hampton call center accounted for $293,000 of the increase, the new storage facility accounted for $28,000 of the increase and the administrative/mail site accounted for $19,000 of the increase. The remaining increase was attributable to contractual increases in annual rental rates.

Other Operating Expenses

     Other operating expenses were $1.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2003, an increase of $500,000 or 35.7% compared to other operating expenses of $1.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2002. The increase was due to increases in repairs and maintenance, hiring and insurance. Repairs and maintenance expenses increased by $124,000, hiring expenses increased by $139,000 and insurance expense increased by $257,000, offset by decreases in other expense items of $20,000.

Depreciation and amortization

     Depreciation and amortization expenses were $1.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2003, an increase of $460,000 or 48.9% compared to depreciation expenses of $940,000 for the year ended December 31, 2002. The increase was attributable to continued capital expenditures on equipment, software, and computers related to the Company’sour growth and systems upgrades. Of the increase in depreciation expenses, 61.7% is the result of the March 2003 opening of its our

32


new Hampton office and an associated $2.0 million in equipment purchases. The remaining increase of 38.3% was the result of system upgrades.

Interest Income

     Interest income was $60,000 for the year ended December 31, 2003, an increase of $38,000 or 172.7% compared to interest income of $22,000 for the year ended December 31, 2002. This increase is the result of investing in short-term municipal instruments during the first half of 2003 versus investments of less than two months in 2002.

Interest Expense

     Interest expense was $600,000 for the year ended December 31, 2003, a decrease of $1.8 million or 75.0% compared to interest expense of $2.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2002. This decreased primarily as a result of the payoff of all outstanding revolving debt with the proceeds from the Company’sour initial public offering, but also includes a $284,000 charge related to the termination of the Westside Funding facility in the fourth quarter of 2003.

Year Ended December 31, 2002 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 200133

Revenue

     Total revenue was $55.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2002, an increase of $23.5 million or 72.8% compared to total revenue of $32.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2001.

Income Recognized on Finance Receivables

     Income recognized on finance receivables was $53.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2002, an increase of $22.6 million or 72.4% compared to income recognized on finance receivables of $31.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2001. The majority of the increase was due to an increase in the Company’s cash collections on its owned defaulted consumer receivables to $79.3 million from $53.1 million, an increase of 49.3%. In the second half of 2001 and continuing throughout 2002, the Company has experienced an acceleration of the increase in its collector productivity resulting in an acceleration of its performance in cash collections

27


 

compared to projections. This performance has led to lower amortization rates as the Company’s projected multiple of cash collections to purchase price has increased. The Company’s amortization rate on owned portfolios for the year ended December 31, 2002 was 32.1% while for the year ended December 31, 2001 it was 41.2%. During the year ended December 31, 2002, the Company acquired defaulted consumer receivables portfolios with an aggregate face value amount of $2.0 billion at an original purchase price of $42.4 million. During the year ended December 31, 2001, the Company acquired defaulted consumer receivable portfolios with an aggregate face value of $1.6 billion at an original purchase price of $33 million (inclusive of purchases subsequently sold). The Company’s relative cost of acquiring defaulted consumer receivable portfolios increased to 2.2% of face value for the year ended December 31, 2002 from 2.1% of face value for the year ended December 31, 2001.

Commissions

     Commissions were $1.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2002, an increase of $1.7 million or 790.7% compared to commissions of $215,000 for the year ended December 31, 2001. Commissions increased as business volume increased substantially in the Company’s contingent fee collection business as a result of increased account placements.

Net gain on cash sales of defaulted consumer receivables

     Net gain on cash sales of defaulted consumer receivables were $100,000 for the year ended December 31, 2002, a decrease of $801,000 or 88.9% compared to net gain on cash sales of defaulted consumer receivables of $901,000 for the year ended December 31, 2001. During September 2001, the Company purchased $4.4 million of defaulted consumer receivables that were immediately sold to a buying entity. A net gain of $369,000 was recognized on this back to back purchase-sale transaction. The remaining change is the result of one sale in 2002 versus twelve small sales in 2001.

Operating Expenses

     Total operating expenses were $34.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2002, an increase of $11.3 million or 47.9% compared to total operating expenses of $23.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2001. Total operating expenses, including compensation expenses, were 43.0% of cash receipts excluding sales for the year ended December 31, 2002 compared with 44.4% for the same period in 2001.

Compensation and Employee Services

     Compensation and employee services expenses were $21.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2002, an increase of $6.1 million or 39.1% compared to compensation and employee services expenses of $15.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2001. Compensation and employee services expenses increased as total employees grew to 581 at December 31, 2002 from 501 at December 31, 2001. Additionally, existing employees received normal salary increases and increased bonuses. Compensation and employee services expenses as a percentage of cash collections decreased to 27.4% for the year ended December 31, 2002 from 29.3% of cash collections for the same period in 2001.

Outside Legal and Other Fees and Services

     Outside legal and other fees and services expenses were $8.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2002, an increase of $4.5 million or 125.0% compared to outside legal and other fees and services expenses of $3.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2001. The increase was attributable to the increased cash collections resulting from the increased number of accounts referred to independent contingent fee attorneys. This increase is consistent with the growth the Company experienced in its portfolio of defaulted consumer receivables, and a portfolio management strategy shift implemented in mid 2002. This strategy resulted in the Company referring to the legal suit process unsuccessfully liquidated accounts that have an identified means of repayment but that are nearing their legal statute of limitations.

28


Communications

     Communications expenses were $1.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2002, an increase of $270,000 or 18.8% compared to communications expenses of $1.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2001. The increase was attributable to growth in mailings and higher telephone expenses incurred to collect on a greater number of defaulted consumer receivables owned and serviced. Mailings were responsible for 69.4% of this increase, while the remaining 30.6% was attributable to a higher number of phone calls.

Rent and Occupancy

     Rent and occupancy expenses were $799,000 for the year ended December 31, 2002, an increase of $87,000 or 12.2% compared to rent and occupancy expenses of $712,000 for the year ended December 31, 2001. The increase was attributable to increased leased space related to a storage facility, an off-site administrative and mail handling site and contractual increases in annual rental rates. The new storage facility accounted for $7,300 of the increase and the administrative/mail site accounted for $19,000 of the increase. The remaining increase was attributable to contractual increases in annual rental rates.

Other Operating Expenses

     Other operating expenses were $1.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2002, an increase of $171,000 or 13.2% compared to other operating expenses of $1.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2001. The increase was due to increases in taxes, fees and licenses, travel and meals and miscellaneous expenses. Taxes, fees and licenses increased by $81,000, travel and meals increased $94,000 and miscellaneous expenses decreased by $4,000.

Depreciation

     Depreciation expenses were $940,000 for the year ended December 31, 2002, an increase of $263,000 or 38.8% compared to depreciation expenses of $677,000 for the year ended December 31, 2001. The increase was attributable to continued capital expenditures on equipment, software, and computers related to our continued growth.

Interest Income

     Interest income was $22,000 for the year ended December 31, 2002, a decrease of $42,000 or 65.6% compared to interest income of $64,000 for the year ended December 31, 2001. This decrease occurred due to a drop in our yields during the fourth quarter of 2001. As a result of the yield decrease, the Company terminated the treasury repurchase agreement in favor of earning fee offset credit with our bank.

Interest Expense

     Interest expense was $2.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2002, a decrease of $335,000 or 12.0% compared to interest expense of $2.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2001. This decreased primarily as a result of the payoff of all outstanding revolving debt with the proceeds from the Company’s initial public offering.

29


Supplemental Performance Data

Owned Portfolio Performance:

     The following table shows the Company’sour portfolio buying activity by year, setting forth, among other things, the purchase price, actual cash collections and estimated remaining cash collections as of December 31, 2003.2004.

     ($($ in thousands)

 Actual Cash Total Estimated
 Collections Collections to
Purchase Period Actual Cash Collections Estimated Total Total Estimated Purchase Including Cash Estimated Remaining Total Estimated Purchase
Ending Including Cash Sales Remaining Estimated Collections to
December 31, Purchase Price(1)   Collections(2) Collections(3) Purchase Price(4)
          
Ending December 31, Price(1) Sales Collections(2) Collections(3) Price(4)
1996 $3,080 $8,980 $244 $9,224  299% $3,080 $9,265 $95 $9,361  304%
1997 $7,685 $21,387 $544 $21,931  285% $7,685 $22,423 $274 $22,697  295%
1998 $11,122 $28,945 $1,655 $30,600  275% $11,089 $31,133 $827 $31,960  288%
1999 $18,912 $47,924 $6,630 $54,554  288% $18,898 $53,539 $3,532 $57,070  302%
2000 $25,068 $62,960 $17,074 $80,034  319% $25,015 $77,058 $10,295 $87,352  349%
2001 $33,538 $75,373 $36,692 $112,065  334% $33,472 $102,090 $27,209 $129,299  386%
2002 $42,588 $51,331 $73,098 $124,429  292% $42,282 $87,084 $51,511 $138,596  328%
2003 $62,640 $24,308 $131,729 $156,037  249% $61,528 $74,014 $92,432 $166,446  271%
2004 $61,355 $18,025 $121,936 $139,960  228%


(1) Purchase price refers to the cash paid to a seller to acquire defaulted consumer receivables, plus certain capitalized expenses,costs, less the purchase price refunded by the seller due to the return of non-compliant accounts (also defined as buybacks). Non-compliant refers to the contractual representations and warranties provided for in the purchase and sale contract between the seller and the Company.us. These representations and warranties from the sellers generally cover account holders’ death or bankruptcy and accounts settled or disputed prior to sale. The seller can replace or repurchase these accounts.

 
(2) Estimated remaining collections refers to the sum of all future projected cash collections on our owned portfolios.

 
(3) Total estimated collections refers to the actual cash collections, including cash sales, plus estimated remaining collections.

 
(4) Total estimated collections to purchase price refers to the total estimated collections divided by the purchase price.

     When the Company acquireswe acquire a portfolio of defaulted accounts, itwe generally doesdo so with a forecast of future total collections to purchase price paid of no more than 2.4 to 2.6 times. Only after the portfolio has established probable and estimable performance in excess of that projection will estimated remaining collections be increased. If actual results are less than the original forecast, the Company moves aggressively to lower estimated remaining collections to appropriate levels.

3034


 

     The following graph shows the Company’s purchase price in itsof our owned portfolios by year beginning in 1996. The purchase price number represents the cash paid to the seller to acquire defaulted consumer receivables, plus certain capitalized expenses,costs, less the purchase price refunded by the seller due to the return of non-compliant accounts.

     The Company utilizesWe utilize a long-term approach to collecting itsour owned pools of receivables. This approach has historically caused the Companyus to realize significant cash collections and revenues from purchased pools of finance receivables years after they are originally acquired. As a result, the Company haswe have in the past been able to temporarily reduce itsour level of current period acquisitions without a corresponding negative current period impact on cash collections and revenue.

     The following table, which excludes any proceeds from cash sales of finance receivables, demonstrates the Company’sour ability to realize significant multi-year cash collection streams on itsour owned pools.

Cash Collections By Year, By Year of Purchase

                                                                   
Cash Collections By Year, By Year of Purchase
($ in thousands)($ in thousands)($ in thousands) 

PurchasePurchase Purchase Cash Collection Period Purchase Cash Collection Period         
PeriodPeriod Price 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 Total Price 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 Total 


 
19961996 $3,080 $548 $2,484 $1,890 $1,348 $1,025 $730 $496 $398 $8,919  $3,080 $548 $2,484 $1,890 $1,348 $1,025 $730 $496 $398 $285 $9,204 
19971997 7,685  2,507 5,215 4,069 3,347 2,630 1,829 1,324 20,921  7,685  2,507 5,215 4,069 3,347 2,630 1,829 1,324 1,022 $21,943 
19981998 11,122   3,776 6,807 6,398 5,152 3,948 2,797 28,878  11,089   3,776 6,807 6,398 5,152 3,948 2,797  2,200  $31,078 
19991999 18,912    5,138 13,069 12,090 9,598 7,336 47,231  18,898    5,138 13,069 12,090 9,598 7,336  5,615  $52,846 
20002000 25,068     6,894 19,498 19,478 16,628 62,498  25,015     6,894 19,498 19,478 16,628  14,098  $76,596 
20012001 33,538      13,048 28,820 28,003 69,871  33,472      13,048 28,831 28,003 26,717 $96,599 
20022002 42,588       15,084 36,258 51,342  42,282       15,073 36,258 35,742 $87,073 
20032003 62,640        24,308 24,308  61,528        24,308 49,706  $74,014 
2004 61,355           18,019  $18,019 
 
   
TotalTotal $204,633 $548 $4,991 $10,881 $17,362 $30,733 $53,148 $79,253 $117,052 $313,968  $264,404 $548 $4,991 $10,881 $17,362 $30,733 $53,148 $79,253  $117,052  $153,404  $467,372 


 

3135


 

     When the Company acquireswe acquire a new pool of finance receivables, our estimates typically result in a 60-7272-84 month projection of cash collections is created.collections. The following chart shows the Company’sour historical cash collections (including cash sales of finance receivables) in relation to the aggregate of the total estimated collection projections made at the time of each respective pool purchase.

Owned Portfolio Personnel Performance:

     The Company measuresWe measure the productivity of each collector each month, breaking results into groups of similarly tenured collectors. The following three tables display various productivity measures tracked by the Company.that we track.

Collector by Tenure

                      
Tenure at: 12/31/99 12/31/00 12/31/01 12/31/02 12/31/03 12/31/00 12/31/01 12/31/02 12/31/03 12/31/04
One year +(1)
 44 109 151 210 241   109   151   210   241   298 
Less than one year(2)
 158 180 218 223 338   180   218   223   338   349 
Total(2)
 202 289 369 433 579   289   369   433   579   647 


(1) Calculated based on actual employees (collectors) with one year of service or more.

(2) Calculated using total hours worked by all collectors, including those in training to produce a full time equivalent “FTE.”

Monthly Cash Collections by Tenure(1)

                     
Average performance 12/31/99 12/31/00 12/31/01 12/31/02 12/31/03
One year +(2)
 $12,906  $14,081  $15,205  $16,927  $18,158 
Less than one year(3)
  7,153   7,482   7,740   8,689   8,303 
                     
Average performance 12/31/00 12/31/01 12/31/02 12/31/03 12/31/04
One year +(2)
 $14,081  $15,205  $16,927  $18,158  $17,129 
Less than one year(3)
  7,482   7,740   8,689   8,303   9,363 


(1) Cash collection numbers include only accounts assigned to collectors. Significant cash collections do occur on “unassigned” accounts.

(2) Calculated using average YTD monthly cash collections of all collectors with one year or more of tenure.

(3) Calculated using weighted average YTD monthly cash collections of all collectors with less than one year of tenure, including those in training.

Cash Collections per Hour Paid(1)Paid(1)

                     
Average performance 12/31/99 12/31/00 12/31/01 12/31/02 12/31/03
Total cash collections $53.41  $64.37  $77.20  $96.37  $108.27 
Non-legal cash collections $47.81  $53.31  $66.87  $77.72  $80.10 
                     
Average performance 12/31/00  12/31/01  12/31/02  12/31/03  12/31/04 
Total cash collections $64.37  $77.20  $96.37  $108.27  $117.59 
Non-legal cash collections $53.31  $66.87  $77.72  $80.10  $82.06 

36



(1) Cash collections (assigned and unassigned) divided by total hours paid (including holiday, vacation and sick time) to all collectors (including those in training).

32


     Cash collections have substantially exceeded revenue in each quarter since the Company’sour formation. The following chart illustrates the consistent excess of the Company’sour cash collections on itsour owned portfolios over income recognized in finance receivables on a quarterly basis. The difference between cash collections and income recognized is referred to as Payments Appliedpayments applied to Principal.principal. It is also referred to as Amortization.amortization of purchase price. This amortization is the portion of cash collections that is used to recover the cost of the portfolio investment represented on the Statement of Financial Position.Balance Sheet.


(1) Includes cash collections on finance receivables only. Excludes commission feescommissions and cash proceeds from sales of defaulted consumer receivables.

3337


 

Seasonality

     The Company dependsWe depend on the ability to collect on itsour owned and serviced defaulted consumer receivables. Collections tend to be higher in the first and second quarters of the year and lower in the third and fourth quarters of the year, due to consumer payment patterns in connection with seasonal employment trends, income tax refunds, and holiday spending habits. Due to the Company’sour historical quarterly cash collections, itsour growth has partially masked the impact of this seasonality.


(1) Includes cash collections on finance receivables only. Excludes commission fees and cash proceeds from sales of defaulted consumer receivables.

     The following table shows the changes in finance receivables, including the amounts paid to acquire new portfolios.

            
 2003 2002 2001            
       2004 2003 2002 
Balance at beginning of year $65,526,235 $47,986,744 $41,124,377  $92,568,557 $65,526,235 $47,986,744 
Acquisitions of finance receivables, net of buybacks(1)
 62,298,316 42,990,924 33,491,211  59,770,354 62,298,316 42,990,924 
Cash collections applied to principal on finance receivables(2)
  (35,255,994)  (25,450,833)  (21,926,815)  (47,150,005)  (35,255,994) (25,450,833 
Cost of finance receivables sold, net of allowance for returns   (600)  (4,702,029)   (600)
 
 
 
        
Balance at end of year $92,568,557 $65,526,235 $47,986,744  $105,188,906 $92,568,557 $65,526,235 
 
 
 
        
 
Estimated Remaining Collections (“ERC”)(3)
 $267,666,689 $195,669,147 $117,022,955  $308,111,355 $267,666,689 $195,669,147 
 
 
 
        


(1) Agreements to purchase receivables typically include general representations and warranties from the sellers covering account holders’ death or bankruptcy and accounts settled or disputed prior to sale. The seller can replace or repurchase these accounts. The Company refersWe refer to repurchased accounts as buybacks. The CompanyWe also capitalizescapitalize certain acquisition related expenses.costs.
(2) Cash collections applied to principal (also referred to as amortization) on finance receivables consists of cash collections less income recognized on finance receivables.
(3) Estimated Remaining Collections refers to the sum of all future projected cash collections on the Company’sour owned portfolios. ERC is not a balance sheet item, however, it is provided here for informational purposes.

3438


 

Liquidity and Capital Resources

     Historically, the Company’sour primary sources of cash have been cash flows from operations, bank borrowings, and equity offerings. Cash has been used for acquisitions of finance receivables, repayments of bank borrowings, purchases of property and equipment, and working capital to support the Company’sour growth.

     The Company believesWe believe that funds generated from operations, together with existing cash and available borrowings under itsour credit agreement will be sufficient to finance itsour current operations, planned capital expenditure requirements, and internal growth at least through the next twelve months. However, the Companywe could require additional debt or equity financing if itwe were to make any other significant acquisitions requiring cash during that period.

     Cash generated from operations is dependent upon the Company’sour ability to collect on itsour defaulted consumer receivables. Many factors, including the economy and the Company’sour ability to hire and retain qualified collectors and managers, are essential to itsour ability to generate cash flows. Fluctuations in these factors that cause a negative impact on the Company’sour business could have a material impact on itsour expected future cash flows.

     The Company’sOur operating activities provided cash of $49.3 million, $35.1 million $21.8 million and $6.5$21.8 million for the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003 2002 and 2001,2002, respectively. In these periods, cash from operations was generated primarily from net income earned through cash collections and commissions received and gains on cash sales of defaulted consumer receivables for the year.received. Net income increased to $27.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2004 from $20.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2003 fromand $17.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2002 and $5.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2001.2002. In addition, the Companywe realized tax benefits derived from stock option and stock warrant exercises of $1.1 million in 2004, $16.4 million in 2003 and $0.2 million in 2002 and $0 in 2001.2002.

     The Company’sOur investing activities used cash of $29.5$50.8 million, $18.8$23.5 million and $7.2$24.7 million for the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002, and 2001, respectively. CashNet cash used in investing activities is primarily driven by acquisitions of defaulted consumer receivables, net of cash collections applied to the cost of the receivables.receivables and purchases of auction rate certificates. In addition, in 2004, we purchased the assets of IGS Nevada, Inc. for $12.1 million in cash including acquisition costs.

     The Company’sOur financing activities provided cash of $1.1 million, $1.4 million $10.1 million and $2.3$10.1 million for the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002, and 2001, respectively. During the current year, theThe exercise of stock options and stock warrants generated cash from financing activities of $1.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2004, $1.4 million.million for the year ended December 31, 2003 and $210,000 for the year ended December 31, 2002. In 2002, the IPO generated cash of $40.4 million. Utilizing proceeds from the IPO, the Companywe paid off the outstanding balance of itsour line of credit of $29.0 million. In 2001, a principal sourcemillion at the time of cash was $2.8 million of proceeds from lines of credit.the offering.

     Cash paid for interest expense was $273,000, $281,000 $2.7 million and $2.8$2.7 million for the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003 2002 and 2001,2002, respectively. In 2004 and 2003, the majority of interest expenses were paid on long-term debt and capital lease obligations. In addition, the Companyin 2003, we terminated itsour line of credit agreement with WestLB and incurred $284,000 of additional non-cash interest costs. In 2002, and 2001, the majority of interest expenses were paid for lines of credit used to finance acquisitions of defaulted consumer receivables portfolios.

     The Company maintainsWe maintain a $25.0 million revolving line of credit with RBC Centura Bank (“RBC”) pursuant to an agreement entered into on November 28, 2003. On November 22, 2004, we amended this revolving line of credit agreement by entering into an Amended and Restated Commercial Promissory Note with RBC. The Company, as well as Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC, PRA Receivables Management LLC (d/b/a Anchor Receivables Management) and PRA Holding I, LLC (all of which are wholly-owned subsidiariesonly material change to the original agreement was the extension of the Company) are guarantorsmaturity date to this agreement.November 28, 2006. Other terms of the original agreement, including the rate of interest, payment terms and available credit, remain the same . The credit facility bears interest at a spread of 2.50% over LIBOR and extends through November 28, 2004.2006. The agreement provides for:

restrictions on borrowings are limited to 20% of Estimated Remaining Collections;
•  restrictions on monthly borrowings are limited to 20% of Estimated Remaining Collections;
•  a debt coverage ratio of at least 8.0 to 1.0 calculated on a rolling twelve-month average;
•  a debt to tangible net worth ratio of less than 0.40 to 1.00;

a debt coverage ratio of at least 8.0 to 1.0 calculated on a rolling twelve-month average;39

a debt to tangible net worth ratio of less than 0.40 to 1.00;

net income per quarter of at least $1.00, calculated on a consolidated basis; and

35


 

restrictions on change of control.

   This facility had no amounts outstandingnet income per quarter of at December 31, 2003.least $1.00, calculated on a consolidated basis; and
•  restrictions on change of control.

     This facility had no amounts outstanding at December 31, 2004.

     As of December 31, 20032004 there are fourfive loans outstanding. On July 20, 2000, PRA Holding Ione of our subsidiaries entered into a credit facility for a $550,000 loan, for the purpose of purchasing a building and land in Hutchinson, Kansas. The loan bears interest at a variable rate based on LIBOR and consists of monthly principal payments for 60 months and a final installment of unpaid principal and accrued interest payable on July 21, 2005. On February 9, 2001, the Companywe entered into a commercial loan agreement in the amount of $107,000 in order to purchase equipment for itsour Norfolk, Virginia location. This loan bears interest at a fixed rate of 7.9% and matures on February 1, 2006. On February 20, 2002, PRA Holding Ione of our subsidiaries entered into an additional arrangement for a $500,000 commercial loan in order to finance construction of a parking lot at the Company’sour Norfolk, Virginia location. This loan bears interest at a fixed rate of 6.47% and matures on September 1, 2007. On May 1, 2003, the Companywe entered into a commercial loan agreement in the amount of $975,000 to finance equipment purchases for itsour Hampton, Virginia location. This loan bears interest at a fixed rate of 4.25% and matures on May 1, 2008. On January 9, 2004, we entered into a commercial loan agreement in the amount of $750,000 to finance equipment purchases at our newly leased Norfolk facility. This loan bears interest at a fixed rate of 4.45% and matures on January 1, 2009. The loans are collateralized by the related asset and require us to maintain net worth greater than $20 million and a cash flow coverage ratio of at least 1.5 to 1.0 calculated on a rolling twelve-month average.

Contractual Obligations

     Obligations of the Company     The following summarizes our contractual obligations that exist as of December 31, 2003 are as follows:2004:

                                        
 Payments due by period Payments due by period   
 Less More Less More 
 than 1 1-3 3-5 than 5 than 1 1 - 3 4 - 5 than 5 
Contractual Obligations Total year years years years Total year years years years 


Operating Leases $13,172,919 $1,657,219 $2,999,778 $3,165,645 $5,350,277 
Long-Term Debt $1,817,022 $429,643 $1,019,464 $367,915 $  2,072,844 848,801 969,984 254,059  
Capital Lease Obligations 599,508 249,262 238,517 111,729   629,463 219,372 304,443 105,648  
Operating Leases 14,346,186 1,391,115 2,937,750 3,064,727 6,952,595 
Purchase Commitments(1)
 6,575,227 1,905,227 4,490,000 180,000  
Employment Agreements 3,676,333 2,183,854 1,492,479   
 
  
Total $16,762,716 $2,070,019 $4,195,731 $3,544,371 $6,952,595  $26,126,786 $6,814,473 $10,256,684 $3,705,352 $5,350,277 
 
  


(1)Of this amount, $4,000,000 represents the potential payout we will incur as additional purchase price in years 1-3 in association with the acquisition of the assets of IGS Nevada, Inc. The earn out provisions are defined in the asset purchase agreement.

Off Balance Sheet Arrangements

     The Company doesWe do not have any of theseoff balance sheet arrangements as defined by regulationRegulation S-K 303(a)(4). promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

     In January 2003, the FASB issued FIN No. 46, Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities. FIN No. 46 is an interpretation of ARB No. 51 and addresses consolidation by business enterprises of variable interest entities (“VIEs”). This interpretation is based on the theory that an enterprise controlling another entity through interests other than voting interests should consolidate the controlled entity. Business enterprises are required under the provisions of this interpretation to identify VIEs, based on specified characteristics, and then determine whether they should be consolidated. An enterprise that holds a majority of the variable interests is considered the primary beneficiary, the enterprise that should consolidate the VIE. The primary beneficiary of a VIE is also required to include various disclosures in interim and annual financial statements. Additionally, an enterprise that holds a significant variable interest in a VIE, but that is not the primary beneficiary, is also required to make certain disclosures. This interpretation is effective for all enterprises with variable interest in VIEs created after January 31, 2003. A public entity with variable interests in a VIE created before February 1, 2003, is required to apply the provisions of this interpretation to that entity by the end of the first interim or annual reporting period beginning after June 15, 2003. The adoption of this interpretation did not have a material impact on the Company’s financial position or the results of operations.

     In October 2003, the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (“AICPA”) issued Statement of Position (“SOP”) 03-03, “Accounting for Loans or Certain Securities Acquired in a Transfer.” The SOP providesproposes guidance on accounting for differences between contractual and expected cash flows from an investor’s initial investment in loans or debt securities acquired in a transfer if those differences are attributable, at least in part, to credit quality. The SOP is effective for loans acquired in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2004.2004 and amends Practice Bulletin 6 which remains in effect for loans acquired prior to the SOP effective date. The SOP would limit the revenue that may be accrued to the excess of the estimate of expected future cash flows over a

3640


 

a portfolio’s initial cost of accounts receivable acquired. The SOP would require that the excess of the contractual cash flows over expected future cash flows not be recognized as an adjustment of revenue, expense, or on the balance sheet. The SOP would initially freeze the internal rate of return, referred to as IRR, originally estimated when the accounts receivable are purchased for subsequent impairment testing. Rather than lower the estimated IRR if the original collection estimates are not received, effective January 1, 2005, the carrying value of a portfolio would be written down to maintain the originalthen-current IRR. The SOP also amends Practice Bulletin 6 in a similar manner and applies to all loans acquired prior to January 1, 2005. Increases in expected future cash flows wouldcan be recognized prospectively through an upward adjustment of the IRR over a portfolio’s remaining life. Any increased yield then becomes the new benchmark for impairment testing. The SOP provides that previously issued annual financial statements would not need to be restated. Management isHistorically, as we have applied the guidance of Practice Bulletin 6, we have moved yields upward and downward as appropriate under that guidance. However, since the new SOP guidance does not permit yields to be lowered, under either the revised Practice Bulletin 6 or SOP 03-03, it will increase the probability of us having to incur impairment charges in the processfuture.

     In December 2003, the Securities and Exchange Commission released Staff Accounting Bulletin (SAB) No. 104, Revenue Recognition, which supercedes SAB 101, Revenue Recognition in Financial Statements. SAB 104 clarifies existing guidance regarding revenue contracts that contain multiple deliverables to make it consistent with Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF) No. 00-21. The adoption of evaluatingSAB 104 did not have a material impact on our results of operations or financial position.

     On December 16, 2004, the applicationFinancial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued FASB statement No. 123R, “Share-Based Payment,” (“FAS 123R”). FAS 123R revises FASB statement No. 123, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation,” (“FAS 123”) and requires companies to expense the fair value of employee stock options and other forms of stock-based compensation. In addition to revising FAS 123, FAS 123R supersedes Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25, “Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees” and amends FASB Statement No. 95, “Statement of Cash Flows.” FAS 123R applies to all stock-based compensation transactions in which a company acquires services by (1) issuing its stock or other equity instruments, except through arrangements resulting from employee stock-ownership plans (ESOPs) or (2) incurring liabilities that are based on the company’s stock price. FAS 123R is effective for periods that begin after June 15, 2005; however, early adoption is encouraged. We believe that all of our existing stock-based awards are equity instruments. We previously adopted FAS 123 on January 1, 2002 and have been expensing equity based compensation since that time. We believe the adoption of FAS 123R will have no material impact on our financial statements.

Critical Accounting Policies

     The preparation of financial statements and related disclosures in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles and our discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations require our management to make judgments, assumptions, and estimates that affect the amounts reported in our consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes. Note 2 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements of this SOP.

Critical Accounting PolicyForm 10-K describes the significant accounting policies and methods used in the preparation of our consolidated financial statements. We base our estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities. Actual results may differ from these estimates and such differences may be material.

     The Company utilizesManagement believes our critical accounting policies and estimates are those related to revenue recognition, valuation of acquired intangibles and goodwill and income taxes. Management believes these policies to be critical because they are both important to the portrayal of our financial condition and results, and they require management to make judgments and estimates about matters that are inherently uncertain. Our senior management has reviewed these critical accounting policies and related disclosures with the Audit Committee of our Board of Directors.

41


Revenue Recognition

     We account for our investment in finance receivables using the interest method under the guidance provided byof Practice Bulletin 6, “Amortization of Discounts on Certain Acquired Loans,Loans.to determine income recognized on finance receivables. Under this method, eachStatic pools of relatively homogenous accounts are established. Once a static pool of receivables it acquires is statistically modeled to determine its projected cash flows. A yieldestablished, the receivable accounts in the pool are not changed. Each static pool is then established which, when applied to the outstanding balance of the receivables, results inrecorded at cost, and is accounted for as a single unit for the recognition of income, at a constant yield relative toprincipal payments and loss provision. Income on finance receivables is accrued monthly based on each static pool’s effective interest rate. This interest rate is estimated and periodically recalculated upward or downward based on the remaining balance intiming and amount of anticipated cash flows using our proprietary collection model. Monthly cash flows greater than the interest accrual will reduce the carrying value of the static pool. Likewise, monthly cash flows that are less than the monthly accrual will accrete the carrying balance. Each pool is analyzedreviewed monthly and compared to assessour models to ensure complete amortization of the actual performancecarrying balance at the end of each pool’s life. In the event that cash collections would be inadequate to that expectedamortize the carrying balance, an impairment charge would be taken with a corresponding write-off of the receivable balance. Accordingly, we do not maintain an allowance for credit losses.

     As discussed more fully in this same section under “Recent Accounting Pronouncements,” we will begin to apply the provisions of SOP 03-03 on January 1, 2005. This SOP will become the basis for our revenue recognition of our owned finance receivables portfolio.

     We utilize the provisions of Emerging Issues Task Force 99-19, “Reporting Revenue Gross as a Principal versus Net as an Agent” (“EITF 99-19”) to commission revenue from our contingent fee and skip-tracing subsidiaries. EITF 99-19 requires an analysis to be completed to determine if certain revenues should be reported gross or reported net of their related operating expense. This analysis includes who retains inventory/credit risk, who controls vendor selection, who establishes pricing and who remains the primary obligor on the transaction. Each of these factors were considered to determine the correct method of recognizing revenue from our subsidiaries.

     For our contingent fee subsidiary, revenue is recognized at the time customer (debtor) funds are collected. The portfolios are owned by the model.clients and the collection effort is outsourced to our subsidiary under a commission fee arrangement. The clients retain control and ownership of the accounts we service. These revenues are reported on a net basis and are included in the line item “Commissions.”

     Our skip tracing subsidiary utilizes gross reporting under this EITF. We generate revenue by working an account and successfully locating a customer for our client. An “investigative fees” is received for these services. In addition, we incur “agent expenses” where we hire a third-party collector to effectuate repossession. In many cases we have an arrangement with our client which allows us to bill the client for these fees. We have determined these fees to be gross revenue based on the criteria in EITF 99-19 and they are recorded as such in the line item “Commissions,” primarily because we are primarily liable to the third party collector. There is a corresponding expense in “Outside Legal and Other Fees and Services” for these pass-through items.

     We account for our gain on cash sales of finance receivables under SFAS No. 140, “Accounting for Transfers and Servicing of Financial Assets and Extinguishments of Liabilities.” Gains on sale of finance receivables, representing the difference between the sales price and the unamortized value of the finance receivables sold, are recognized when finance receivables are sold.

     We apply a financial components approach that focuses on control when accounting and reporting for transfers and servicing of financial assets and extinguishments of liabilities. Under that approach, after a transfer of financial assets, an entity recognizes the financial and servicing assets it controls and the liabilities it has incurred, eliminates financial assets when control has been surrendered, and eliminates liabilities when extinguished. This approach provides consistent standards for distinguishing transfers of financial assets that are sales from transfers that are secured borrowings.

42


Valuation of Acquired Intangibles and Goodwill

     In accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 142, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets,” we are required to perform a review of goodwill for impairment annually, or earlier if indicators of potential impairment exist. The review of goodwill for potential impairment is highly subjective and requires that: (1) goodwill be allocated to various reporting units of our business to which it relates; (2) we estimate the fair value of those reporting units to which the goodwill relates; and (3) we determine the book value of those reporting units. If the estimated fair value of reporting units with allocated goodwill is determined to be less than their book value, we are required to estimate the fair value of all identifiable assets and liabilities of those reporting units in a manner similar to a purchase price allocation for an acquired business. This requires independent valuation of certain unrecognized assets. Once this process is complete, the amount of goodwill impairment, if any, can be determined.

     We believe as of December 31, 2004 there was no impairment of goodwill. However, changes in various circumstances including changes in our market capitalization, changes in our forecasts, and changes in our internal business structure could cause one of our reporting units to be valued differently thereby causing an impairment of goodwill. Additionally, in response to changes in our industry and changes in global or regional economic conditions, we may strategically realign our resources and consider restructuring, disposing, or otherwise exiting businesses, which could result in an impairment of some or all of our identifiable intangibles, or goodwill.

Income Taxes

     We record a tax provision for the anticipated tax consequences of the reported results of operations. In accordance with SFAS No. 109, “Accounting for Income Taxes,” the provision for income taxes is computed using the asset and liability method, under which deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the expected future tax consequences of temporary differences between the financial reporting and tax bases of assets and liabilities, and for operating losses and tax credit carryforwards. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are noted,measured using the yieldcurrently enacted tax rates that apply to taxable income in effect for the years in which those tax assets are expected to be realized or settled.

     We believe it is adjusted prospectivelymore likely than not that forecasted income, including income that may be generated as a result of certain tax planning strategies, together with the tax effects of the deferred tax liabilities, will be sufficient to reflectfully recover the estimateremaining deferred tax assets. In the event that all or part of cash flows.the net deferred tax assets are determined not to be realizable in the future, a valuation allowance would be established and charged to earnings in the period such determination is made. Similarly, if we subsequently realize deferred tax assets that were previously determined to be unrealizable, the respective valuation allowance would be reversed, resulting in a positive adjustment to earnings or a decrease in goodwill in the period such determination is made. In addition, the calculation of tax liabilities involves significant judgment in estimating the impact of uncertainties in the application of complex tax laws. Resolution of these uncertainties in a manner inconsistent with our expectations could have a material impact on our results of operations and financial position.

Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosure About Market Risk.

     The Company’sOur exposure to market risk relates to interest rate risk with its variable rate credit line. The Company terminated its only derivative financial instrument to manage or reduce market risk in September 2002. As of December 31, 2003, the Company2004, we had no variable rate debt outstanding on itsour revolving credit line. The Company haslines. We did have variable rate debt outstanding on itsour long-term debt collateralized by the Kansas real estate. A 10% change in future interest rates on the variable rate credit line would not lead to a material decrease in future earnings assuming all other factors remained constant.

3743


 

Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.

Index to Financial Statements

   
  Page
Report of Independent AuditorsRegistered Public Accounting Firm45-46
Consolidated Balance Sheets  39
Consolidated Statements of Financial Position
As of December 31, 20032004 and 20022003
47
Consolidated Income Statements  40
Consolidated Statements of Operations
For the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003 2002 and 20012002
 4148
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity
For the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003 2002 and 20012002 4249
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
For the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003 2002 and 20012002 4350
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements 44-5851-68

3844


 

Report of Independent AuditorsRegistered Public Accounting Firm

Board of Directors and Stockholders
Portfolio Recovery Associates, Inc.:

We have completed an integrated audit of Portfolio Recovery Associates, Inc.’s 2004 consolidated financial statements and of its internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2004 and audits of its 2003 and 2002 consolidated financial statements in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Our opinions, based on our audits, are presented below.

Consolidated financial statements

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements listed in the accompanying consolidated statements of financial position and the related consolidated statements of operations, changes in stockholders’ equity, and of cash flowsindex present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Portfolio Recovery Associates, Inc. and its subsidiaries (the “Company”) at December 31, 20032004 and 2002,2003, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 20032004 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management; ourmanagement. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits. We conducted our audits of these statements in accordance with auditingthe standards generally accepted inof the United States of America, whichPublic Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit of financial statements includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

Internal control over financial reporting

Also, in our opinion, management’s assessment, included in Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting appearing under Item 9A, that the Company maintained effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2004 based on criteria established inInternal Control – Integrated Frameworkissued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO), is fairly stated, in all material respects, based on those criteria. Furthermore, in our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2004, based on criteria established inInternal Control – Integrated Frameworkissued by the COSO. The Company’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting. Our responsibility is to express opinions on management’s assessment and on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit. We conducted our audit of internal control over financial reporting in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. An audit of internal control over financial reporting includes obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, evaluating management’s assessment, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control, and performing such other procedures as we consider necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinions.

A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (i) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (ii) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

45


Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Harrisburg, PennsylvaniaMcLean, Virginia
February 6, 2004March 14, 2005

3946


 

Portfolio Recovery Associates, Inc.
Consolidated Statements of Financial PositionBalance Sheets
December 31, 20032004 and 20022003

                  
 2003 2002 December 31, December 31, 
     2004 2003 
Assets
Assets
  
  
Cash and cash equivalentsCash and cash equivalents $24,911,841 $17,938,730  $24,512,575 $24,911,841 
Investments 23,950,000 $ 
Finance receivables, netFinance receivables, net 92,568,557 65,526,235  105,188,906 92,568,557 
Property and equipment, netProperty and equipment, net 5,166,380 3,794,254  5,752,489 5,166,380 
Deferred tax assetDeferred tax asset 2,009,426    2,009,426 
Income tax receivableIncome tax receivable 351,861    351,861 
Goodwill 6,397,138  
Intangible assets, net 6,318,838  
Other assetsOther assets 1,385,706 1,029,196  3,056,023 1,385,706 
 
 
      
  
 Total assets $126,393,771 $88,288,415 
Total assets $175,175,969 $126,393,771 
 
 
      
  
Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity
Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity
  
  
Liabilities:Liabilities:  
Accounts payable $1,413,726 $1,290,332 
Accrued expenses 1,563,285 513,687 
Income taxes payable 182,221  
Accrued payroll and bonuses 4,475,919 3,233,409 
Deferred tax liability 13,650,722  
Long-term debt 1,924,422 1,656,972 
Obligations under capital lease 576,234 551,325 
Accounts payable $1,290,332 $1,370,404      
Accrued expenses 513,687 760,211  
Total liabilities 23,786,529 7,245,725 
Commitments and contingencies (Note 18) 
Stockholders’ equity: 
Preferred stock, par value $0.01, authorized shares, 2,000,000, issued and outstanding shares - 0   
Common stock, par value $0.01, authorized shares, 30,000,000, issued and outstanding shares - 15,498,210 at December 31, 2004, and 15,294,676 at December 31, 2003 154,982 152,947 
Additional paid in capital 100,905,851 96,117,932 
Retained earnings 50,328,607 22,877,167 
Income taxes payable  937,231      
Accrued payroll and bonuses 3,233,409 2,861,336  
Total stockholders’ equity 151,389,440 119,148,046 
Deferred tax liability  286,882      
Long-term debt 1,656,972 965,582  
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity $175,175,969 $126,393,771 
Obligations under capital lease 551,325 499,151      
 
 
 
 
 Total liabilities 7,245,725 7,680,797 
 
Commitments and contingencies (Note 15) 
Stockholders’ equity: 
Preferred stock, par value $0.01, authorized shares, 2,000,000, issued and outstanding
shares - 0
   
Common stock, par value $0.01, authorized shares, 30,000,000, issued and outstanding shares - 15,294,676 at December 31, 2003, and 13,520,000 at December 31, 2002 152,947 135,200 
Additional paid in capital 96,117,932 78,308,754 
Retained earnings 22,877,167 2,163,664 
 
 
 
 
Total stockholders’ equity 119,148,046 80,607,618 
 
 
 
 
 Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity $126,393,771 $88,288,415 
 
 
 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

4047


 

Portfolio Recovery Associates, Inc.
Consolidated Income Statements of Operations
For the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003 2002 and 20012002

              
 2003 2002 2001            
       2004 2003 2002 
Revenues:Revenues:  
Income recognized on finance receivables $106,254,441 $81,796,209 $53,802,718 
Commissions 7,141,796 3,131,054 1,944,428 
Net gain on cash sales of defaulted consumer receivables   100,156 
Income recognized on finance receivables $81,796,209 $53,802,718 $31,220,857        
Commissions 3,131,054 1,944,428 214,539  
Total revenue 113,396,237 84,927,263 55,847,302 
 
Operating expenses: 
Compensation and employee services 36,620,054 28,986,795 21,700,918 
Outside legal and other fees and services 21,407,570 14,147,394 8,092,460 
Communications 3,638,144 2,772,110 1,914,557 
Rent and occupancy 1,744,885 1,189,379 799,323 
Other operating expenses 2,712,463 1,932,055 1,436,438 
Depreciation and amortization 2,382,896 1,444,825 940,352 
Net gain on cash sales of defaulted consumer receivables  100,156 900,916        
  
 
 
  
Total operating expenses 68,506,012 50,472,558 34,884,048 
        
 Total revenue 84,927,263 55,847,302 32,336,312  
Income from operations 44,890,225 34,454,705 20,963,254 
  
Operating expenses: 
Other income and (expense): 
Interest income 222,718 60,173 21,548 
Interest expense  (273,355)  (602,072)  (2,446,620)
Compensation and employee services 28,986,795 21,700,918 15,644,460        
Outside legal and other fees and services 14,147,394 8,092,460 3,627,135  
Income before income taxes 44,839,588 33,912,806 18,538,182 
 
Provision for income taxes 17,388,148 13,199,303 1,473,073 
Communications 2,772,110 1,914,557 1,644,557        
Rent and occupancy 1,189,379 799,323 712,400  
Net income $27,451,440 $20,713,503 $17,065,109 
Other operating expenses 1,932,055 1,436,438 1,265,132      
Depreciation 1,444,825 940,352 676,677  
Pro forma income taxes (unaudited) 5,693,788 
  
 
 
    
  
Pro forma net income (unaudited) $11,371,321 
 Total operating expenses 50,472,558 34,884,048 23,570,361    
  
 
 
  
Net income per common share 
Basic $1.79 $1.42 
Diluted $1.73 $1.32 
  
 Income from operations 34,454,705 20,963,254 8,765,951 
 
Other income and (expense): 
Interest income 60,173 21,548 65,362 
Loss on extinguishment of debt    (423,305)
Interest expense  (602,072)  (2,446,620)  (2,781,674)
  
 
 
 
 
 Income before income taxes 33,912,806 18,538,182 5,626,334 
 
 Provision for income taxes 13,199,303 1,473,073  
  
 
 
 
 
 Net income $20,713,503 $17,065,109 $5,626,334 
 
 
 
 Pro forma income taxes 5,693,788 2,100,609 
 
 
 
 
 Pro forma net income $11,371,321 $3,525,725 
 
 
 
 
Pro forma net income per common share 
Basic $1.42 $1.08 $0.35 
Diluted $1.32 $0.94 $0.31 
Pro forma weighted average number of shares outstanding 
Basic 14,545,985 10,529,452 10,000,000 
Diluted 15,711,956 12,066,202 11,457,741 
Pro forma net income per common share (unaudited) 
Basic $1.08 
Diluted $0.94 
Weighted average number of shares outstanding 
Basic 15,357,475 14,545,985 10,529,452 
Diluted 15,852,916 15,711,956 12,066,202 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

4148


 

Portfolio Recovery Associates, Inc.
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity
For the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003 2002 and 20012002

                                      
 Accumulated   Accumulated   
 Additional Other Total Additional Other Total 
 Members' Common Paid in Retained Comprehensive Stockholders' Members' Common Paid in Retained Comprehensive Stockholders' 
 Equity Stock Capital Earnings Loss Equity Equity Stock Capital Earnings Loss Equity 
            
Balance at December 31, 2000 $22,705,406 $ $ $ $ $22,705,406 
Net income 5,626,334     5,626,334 
Unrealized loss on interest rate swap      (377,303)  (377,303)
            
 
Total comprehensive income 5,249,031 
Distributions  (202,931)      (202,931)
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Balance at December 31, 2001 28,128,809     (377,303) 27,751,506 
Balance at December 31, 2001 28,128,809     (377,303) 27,751,506 
  
Net incomeNet income 14,901,445   2,163,664  17,065,109  14,901,445   2,163,664  17,065,109 
Reclassification adjustment on interest rate swapReclassification adjustment on interest rate swap     377,303 377,303      377,303 377,303 
            
    
Total comprehensive income 17,442,412 
Total comprehensive income 17,442,412 
Proceeds from initial public offering, net of expensesProceeds from initial public offering, net of expenses  34,700 40,245,184   40,279,884   34,700 40,245,184   40,279,884 
Exercise of warrantsExercise of warrants  500 209,500   210,000   500 209,500   210,000 
RecapitalizationRecapitalization  (37,480,724) 100,000 37,480,724   100,000   (37,480,724) 100,000 37,480,724   100,000 
Amortization of stock-based compensation   124,386   124,386 
Stock-based compensation income tax benefitsStock-based compensation income tax benefits   373,346   373,346    248,960   248,960 
DistributionsDistributions  (5,549,530)      (5,549,530)  (5,549,530)      (5,549,530)
  
 
 
 
 
 
              
  
Balance at December 31, 2002  135,200 78,308,754 2,163,664  80,607,618 
 
Net income    20,713,503  20,713,503 
Exercise of stock options and warrants  17,747 1,377,148   1,394,895 
Amortization of stock-based compensation   422,127   422,127 
Stock-based compensation income tax benefits   16,009,903   16,009,903 
             
 
Balance at December 31, 2003 $ $152,947 $96,117,932 $22,877,167 $ $119,148,046 
Balance at December 31, 2002  135,200 78,308,754 2,163,664  80,607,618              
  
Net incomeNet income    20,713,503  20,713,503     27,451,440  27,451,440 
Exercise of stock options and warrants  17,747 1,377,148   1,394,895 
Stock-based compensation income tax benefits, net of offering expenses   16,432,030   16,432,030 
Exercise of stock options, warrants and vesting of restricted shares  1,336 1,195,013   1,196,349 
Issuance of common stock for acquisition  699 1,999,540   2,000,239 
Amortization of stock-based compensation   507,091   507,091 
Stock-based compensation income tax benefits   1,086,275   1,086,275 
  
 
 
 
 
 
              
  
Balance at December 31, 2004 $ $154,982 $100,905,851 $50,328,607 $ $151,389,440 
Balance at December 31, 2003 $ $152,947 $96,117,932 $22,877,167 $ $119,148,046              
  
 
 
 
 
 
 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.


4249


 

Portfolio Recovery Associates, Inc.
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
For the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003 2002 and 20012002

              
 2003 2002 2001            
       2004 2003 2002 
Operating activities:Operating activities:  
Net income $27,451,440 $20,713,503 $17,065,109 
Adjustments to reconcile net income to cash provided by operating activities: 
Increase in equity from vested options 575,157 422,127 124,386 
Income tax benefit related to stock option exercise 1,086,275 16,396,867 248,960 
Depreciation and amortiztion 2,382,896 1,444,825 940,352 
Deferred tax expense (benefit), net 15,660,148  (2,296,308) 286,882 
Gain on sales of finance receivables, net    (100,156)
Changes in operating assets and liabilities: 
Other assets  (820,317)  (356,510)  (67,824)
Accounts payable 123,394  (80,072) 1,082,269 
Income taxes 534,082  (1,289,092) 937,231 
Accrued expenses 1,049,598  (246,524) 137,180 
Accrued payroll and bonuses 1,242,510 372,073 1,186,965 
Net income $20,713,503 $17,065,109 $5,626,334        
Adjustments to reconcile net income to cash provided by operating activities:  
Net cash provided by operating activities 49,285,183 35,080,889 21,841,354 
       
Cash flows from investing activities: 
Purchases of property and equipment  (2,090,934)  (2,454,138)  (1,316,132)
Acquisition of finance receivables, net of buybacks  (59,770,354)  (62,298,316)  (42,990,924)
Collections applied to principal on finance receivables 47,150,005 35,255,994 25,450,833 
Purchases of auction rate certificates  (23,950,000)   (5,950,000)
Sales of auction rate certificates  5,950,000  
Acquisition of IGS Nevada, net of acquisition costs  (12,146,899)   
Proceeds from sale of finance receivables, net of allowances for returns   100,756 
Increase in equity from vested options 422,127 124,386         
Income tax benefit related to stock option exercise 16,396,867 248,960   
Net cash used in investing activities  (50,808,182)  (23,546,460)  (24,705,467)
       
Cash flows from financing activities: 
Proceeds from initial public offering, net of offering costs   40,379,884 
Proceeds from exercise of options and warrants 1,128,283 1,394,895 210,000 
Public offering costs   (386,964)  
Distribution of capital    (5,549,530)
Net payments on lines of credit    (25,000,000)
Proceeds from long-term debt 750,000 975,000 500,000 
Payments on long-term debt  (482,550)  (283,610)  (102,850)
Payments on capital lease obligations  (272,000)  (310,639)  (365,060)
Depreciation 1,444,825 940,352 676,677        
Loss on extinguishment of debt   423,305  
Net cash provided by financing activities 1,123,733 1,388,682 10,072,444 
Deferred tax (benefit) expense, net  (2,296,308) 286,882         
Gain on sales of finance receivables, net   (100,156)  (900,916) 
Gain on disposal of property and equipment    (1,766)
Changes in operating assets and liabilities: 
 Other assets  (356,510)  (67,824)  (730,230)
 Accounts payable  (80,072) 1,082,269 131,382 
 Income taxes  (1,289,092) 937,231  
 Accrued expenses  (246,524) 137,180 308,168 
 Accrued payroll and bonuses 372,073 1,186,965 963,780 
  
 
 
 
 Net cash provided by operating activities 35,080,889 21,841,354 6,496,734 
  
 
 
 
Cash flows from investing activities: 
Purchases of property and equipment  (2,454,138)  (1,316,132)  (1,279,356)
Acquisition of finance receivables, net of buybacks  (62,298,316)  (42,990,924)  (33,571,212)
Collections applied to principal on finance receivables 35,255,994 25,450,833 21,926,815 
 
Proceeds from sale of finance receivables, net of allowances for returns  100,756 5,682,946 
  
 
 
 
 Net cash used in investing activities  (29,496,460)  (18,755,467)  (7,240,807)
  
 
 
 
Cash flows from financing activities: 
Proceeds from initial public offering, net of offering costs  40,379,884  
Proceeds from exercise of options and warrants 1,394,895 210,000  
Public offering costs  (386,964)   
Distribution of capital   (5,549,530)  (202,931)
Net (payments) proceeds from lines of credit   (25,000,000) 2,833,579 
Proceeds from long-term debt 975,000 500,000 107,000 
Payments on long-term debt  (283,610)  (102,850)  (70,235)
Payments on capital lease obligations  (310,639)  (365,060)  (334,420)
  
 
 
 
 Net cash provided by financing activities 1,388,682 10,072,444 2,332,993 
  
 
 
 
 
 Net increase in cash and cash equivalents 6,973,111 13,158,331 1,588,920 
Net (decrease)/increase in cash and cash equivalents  (399,266) 12,923,111 7,208,331 
  
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of periodCash and cash equivalents, beginning of period 17,938,730 4,780,399 3,191,479  24,911,841 11,988,730 4,780,399 
  
 
 
        
 Cash and cash equivalents, end of period $24,911,841 $17,938,730 $4,780,399 
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period $24,512,575 $24,911,841 $11,988,730 
  
 
 
        
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information:Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information:  
Cash paid for interest $281,332 $2,698,782 $2,821,784 
Cash paid for income taxes $389,600 $ $ 
Cash paid for interest $273,355 $281,332 $2,698,782 
Cash paid for income taxes $390,000 $389,600 $ 
  
Noncash investing and financing activities:Noncash investing and financing activities:  
Capital lease obligations incurred 362,813 38,896 555,988 
Basis — swap contract   (377,303) 377,303 
Capital lease obligations incurred 296,910 362,813 38,896 
Acquisition of IGS Nevada — Common stock issued 2,000,239   
Basis — swap contract    (377,303)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

4350


 

Portfolio Recovery Associates, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

1.Organization and Business:

Portfolio Recovery Associates, Inc. was formed in August 2002. On November 8, 2002, Portfolio Recovery Associates, Inc. completed its initial public offering (“IPO”) of common stock. As a result, all of the membership units and warrants of Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC (“PRA”) were exchanged on a one to one basis for warrants and shares of a single class of common stock of Portfolio Recovery Associates, Inc. (“PRA Inc”). Another subsidiary, PRA II, was dissolved immediately prior to the IPO. PRA Inc, a Delaware corporation, and its subsidiaries (collectively, the “Company”) purchase, collect and manage portfolios of defaulted consumer receivables. The defaulted consumer receivables the Company collects are either purchased from the Debt Sellers or are collected on behalf of clients on a commission fee basis. This is primarily accomplished by maintaining a staff of collectors whose purpose is to contact the customers and arrange payment of the debt. Secondarily, PRA has contracted with independent attorneys, with which the Company can undertake legal action in order to satisfy the outstanding debt.
     Portfolio Recovery Associates, Inc. was formed in August 2002. On November 8, 2002, Portfolio Recovery Associates, Inc. completed its initial public offering (“IPO”) of common stock. As a result, all of the membership units and warrants of Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC (“PRA”) were exchanged on a one to one basis for warrants and shares of a single class of common stock of Portfolio Recovery Associates, Inc. (“PRA Inc”). Another subsidiary, PRA II, was dissolved immediately prior to the IPO. PRA Inc, a Delaware corporation, and its subsidiaries (collectively, the “Company”) purchase, collect and manage portfolios of defaulted consumer receivables. The defaulted consumer receivables the Company collects are either purchased from debt sellers or are collected on behalf of clients on a commission fee basis. This is primarily accomplished by maintaining a staff of collectors whose purpose is to contact the customers and arrange payment of the debt. Secondarily, PRA has contracted with independent attorneys, with which the Company can undertake legal action in order to satisfy the outstanding debt.

     On December 28, 1999, PRA formed a wholly owned subsidiary, PRA Holding I, LLC (“PRA Holding I”), and is the sole initial member. PRA Holding I is organized for the sole purpose of holding the real property in Hutchinson, Kansas (see Note 12) and Norfolk, Virginia.

     On June 1, 2000, PRA formed a wholly owned subsidiary, PRA Receivables Management, LLC (d/b/a Anchor Receivables Management, LLC) (“Anchor”) and was the sole initial member. Anchor is organized as a contingent collection agency and contracts with holders of finance receivables to attempt collection efforts on a contingent basis for a stated period of time. Anchor became fully operational during April 2001. PRA, Inc purchased the equity interest in Anchor from PRA immediately after the IPO.

     On October 1, 2004, PRA acquired the assets of IGS Nevada, Inc., a privately held company specializing in asset-location and debt resolution services. The transaction was completed at a price of $14 million, consisting of $12 million in cash and $2 million in PRA Inc common stock. The total purchase price could increase by $4 million, through contingent cash payments of $2 million each in 2005 and 2006, based upon the performance of the acquired entity during each of those two years. The Company created a new wholly owned subsidiary on September 10, 2004 which holds the acquired assets. This new entity operates under the name of PRA Location Services, LLC d/b/a IGS Nevada (“IGS”). IGS Nevada, Inc.’s founder and his top management team have signed long-term employment agreements and will continue to manage IGS.

     PRA Funding, LLC and PRA III were dissolved into PRA on November 24, 2003.

2.  On December 22, 1999, PRA formed a wholly owned subsidiary, PRA AG Funding, LLC, whose name was changed to PRA Funding, LLC in 2003, and is the sole initial member. The Company was organized for the sole purpose of facilitating the purchase of portfolios of delinquent or charged off consumer credit accounts.

On December 28, 1999, PRA formed a wholly owned subsidiary, PRA Holding I, LLC (“PRA Holding I”), and is the sole initial member. PRA Holding I is organized for the sole purpose of holding the real property in Hutchinson, Kansas (see Note 11) and Norfolk, Virginia.

On June 1, 2000, PRA formed a wholly owned subsidiary, PRA Receivables Management, LLC (d/b/a Anchor Receivables Management, LLC) (“Anchor”) and was the sole initial member. Anchor is organized as a contingent collection agency and contracts with holders of finance receivables to attempt collection efforts on a contingent basis for a stated period of time. Anchor became fully operational during April 2001. PRA, Inc purchased the equity interest in Anchor from PRA immediately after the IPO.

On June 12, 2001, PRA formed a wholly owned subsidiary, PRA III, LLC (“PRA III”) and is the sole initial member. PRA III is organized for the sole purpose of facilitating the purchase of portfolios of delinquent or charged off consumer credit accounts, which purchases are financed by loans from an institutional lender. PRA III was a named borrower under a $25 million loan facility (see Note 7). PRA III was formed under the laws of the Commonwealth of Virginia and will exist in perpetual existence under those laws.

PRA Funding, LLC and PRA III were dissolved into PRA on November 24, 2003.

2.Summary of Significant Accounting Policies:

Principles of accounting and consolidation:The consolidated financial statements of the Company are prepared in accordance with accounting standards generally accepted in the United States of America and include the accounts of PRA, PRA Holding I, PRA Funding, PRA III, and Anchor.Principles of accounting and consolidation:The consolidated financial statements of the Company are prepared in accordance with accounting standards generally accepted in the United States of America and include the accounts of PRA, PRA Holding I, Anchor and IGS. All significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated.

Cash and cash equivalents:The Company considers all highly liquid investments with a maturity of three months or less when purchased to be cash equivalents.

Finance receivables and income recognition:The Company accounts for its investment in finance receivables using the interest method under the guidance of Practice Bulletin 6, “Amortization of Discounts on Certain Acquired Loans.” Static pools of relatively homogenous accounts are established. Once a static pool is established, the receivable accounts in the pool are not changed. Each static pool is recorded at cost, and is accounted for as a single unit for the recognition of income, principal payments and loss provision. Income on finance receivables is accrued monthly based on each static pool’s effective interest rate. This interest rate is estimated and periodically recalculated based on the timing and amount of anticipated cash flows using the Company’s proprietary collection model. Monthly cash flows greater than the interest accrual will reduce the carrying value of the static pool.
Investments:The Company accounts for its investments under the guidance of SFAS 115, “Accounting for Certain Investments in Debt and Equity Securities.” At December 31, 2004, the Company had investments totaling $23,950,000 which consist of variable rate auction rate certificates classified as available-for-sale securities. These securities are recorded at cost, which approximates fair market value due to their variable interest rates, which typically reset every 7 to 35 days, and, despite the long term nature of their stated contractual maturities, the Company has the ability to quickly liquidate these investments. As a result, the Company had no cumulative gross unrealized holding gains (losses) or gross realized gains (losses) from these investments and all income generated was recorded as interest income.

44Concentrations of Credit Risk:Financial instruments, which potentially expose the Company to concentrations of credit risk, consist primarily of cash and cash equivalents and investments. The Company places its cash and cash equivalents and investments with high quality financial institutions. At times, cash balances may be in excess of the amounts insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation. At December 31,2004 and 2003,

51


 

Portfolio Recovery Associates, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Likewise, monthly cash flows that are less than the monthly accrual will accrete the carrying balance. Each pool is reviewed monthly and compared to the Company’s models to ensure complete amortization of the carrying balance at the end of each pool’s life.
the Company had highly liquid investments, with two investment brokerage firms, totaling $23,950,000 and $0, respectively. These investments have ratings of AA or better.

In the event that cash collections would be inadequate to amortize the carrying balance, an impairment charge would be taken with a corresponding write-off of the receivable balance. Accordingly, we do not maintain an allowance for credit losses.
Finance receivables and income recognition:The Company accounts for its investment in finance receivables using the interest method under the guidance of Practice Bulletin 6, “Amortization of Discounts on CertainAcquired Loans.” Static pools of relatively homogenous accounts are established. Once a static pool is established, the receivable accounts in the pool are not changed. Each static pool is recorded at cost, and isaccounted for as a single unit for the recognition of income, principal payments and loss provision. Income on finance receivables is accrued monthly based on each static pool’s effective interest rate. This interest rate is estimated and periodically recalculated upward or downward based on the timing and amount of anticipated cash flows using the Company’s proprietary collection model. Monthly cash flows greater than the interest accrual will reduce the carrying value of the static pool. Likewise, monthly cash flows that areless than the monthly accrual will accrete the carrying balance. Each pool is reviewed monthly and compared to the Company’s models to ensure complete amortization of the carrying balance at the end of each pool’s life. The cost recovery method prescribed by Practice Bulletin 6 is used when collections on a particular portfolio cannot be reasonably predicted. Under the cost recovery method, no revenue is recognized until the Company has fully collected the cost of the portfolio. Additionally, a pool can become fully amortized (zero carrying balance on the Statement of Financial Position) while still generating cash collections. In this case, all cash collections are recognized as revenue when received.

The agreements to purchase the aforementioned receivables include general representations and warranties from the sellers covering account holder death or bankruptcy and accounts settled or disputed prior to sale. The representation and warranty period permitting the return of these accounts from the Company to the seller is typically 90 to 180 days.
     In the event that cash collections would be inadequate to amortize the carrying balance, an impairment charge would be taken with a corresponding write-off of the receivable balance. Accordingly, the Company does not maintain an allowance for credit losses.

Commissions:The Company also receives commission revenue for collections made on behalf of clients, which may be credit originators or other owners of defaulted consumer receivables. These portfolios are owned by the clients; however, the collection effort is outsourced to the Company under a commission fee arrangement based upon the amount the Company collects. Revenue is recognized at the time customer funds are collected. A loss reserve or allowance amount will be created if there is doubt that fees billed to the client for services rendered will not be paid.
     The Company capitalizes certain fees paid to third parties related to the direct acquisition of a portfolio of accounts. These fees are added to the acquisition cost of the portfolio and accordingly are amortized over the life of the portfolio using the interest method. The balance of the unamortized capitalized fees at December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002 was $1,098,847, $1,802,194 and $1,666,682, respectively. During the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002 the Company capitalized $708,632, $1,174,660 and $1,299,803, respectively, of these direct acquisition fees. During the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002 the Company amortized $881,330, $1,039,148 and $531,117, respectively, of these direct acquisition fees. During 2004 the Company wrote-off $530,649 related to the capitalization of fees paid to third parties for address correction and other customer data associated with the acquisition of portfolios purchased over the past 5 years.

Net gain on cash sales of finance receivables:Gains on sale of finance receivables, representing the difference between the sales price and the unamortized value of the finance receivables, are recognized when finance receivables are sold.
     The agreements to purchase the aforementioned receivables include general representations and warranties from the sellers covering account holder death or bankruptcy and accounts settled or disputed prior to sale. The representation and warranty period permitting the return of these accounts from the Company to the seller is typically 90 to 180 days. Any funds received from the seller of finance receivables as a return of purchase price are referred to as buybacks. Buyback funds are simply applied against the finance receivable balance received and are not included in the Company’s cash collections from operations.

The Company applies a financial components approach that focuses on control when accounting and reporting for transfers and servicing of financial assets and extinguishments of liabilities. Under that approach, after a transfer of financial assets, an entity recognizes the financial and servicing assets it controls and the liabilities it has incurred, eliminates financial assets when control has been surrendered, and eliminates liabilities when extinguished. This approach provides consistent standards for distinguishing transfers of financial assets that are sales from transfers that are secured borrowings.
Commissions:The Company utilizes the provisions of Emerging Issues Task Force 99-19, “Reporting Revenue Gross as a Principal versus Net as an Agent” (“EITF 99-19”) to commission revenue from its contingent fee and skip-tracing subsidiaries. EITF 99-19 requires an analysis to be completed to determine if certain revenues should be reported gross or reported net of their related operating expense. This analysis includes who retains inventory/credit risk, who controls vendor selection, who establishes pricing and who remains the primary obligor on the transaction. The Company considered each of these factors to determine the correct method of recognizing revenue from its subsidiaries.

Property and equipment:Property and equipment, including improvements that significantly add to the productive capacity or extend useful life, are recorded at cost, while maintenance and repairs are expensed currently. Property and equipment are depreciated over their useful lives using the straight-line method of depreciation. Software and computer equipment are depreciated over three to five years. Furniture and fixtures are depreciated over five years. Equipment is depreciated over five to seven years. Leasehold improvements are depreciated over the remaining life of the leased property, which ranges from three to seven years. Building improvements are depreciated over ten to thirty-nine years.
     For the Company’s contingent fee subsidiary, revenue is recognized at the time customer (debtor) funds are collected. The portfolios are owned by the clients and the collection effort is outsourced to the Company’s subsidiary under a commission fee arrangement. The clients retain control and ownership of the accounts the Company services. These revenues are reported on a net basis and included in the line item “Commissions.”

Income taxes:Taxes are provided on substantially all income and expense items included in earnings, regardless of the period in which such items are recognised for tax purposes. The Company uses an asset and liability approach that requires the recognition of deferred tax assets and liabilities for the estimated future tax consequences of events that have been recognized in the Company’s financial statements or tax returns. In estimating future tax consequences, the Company generally considers all expected future events other than enactments of changes in the tax laws or rates. The effect on deferred taxes of a change in tax rates is recognized in income in the period that includes the enactment date. For periods presented prior     The Company’s skip tracing subsidiary utilizes gross reporting under this EITF. They generate revenue by working an account and successfully locating a customer for their client. An “investigative fees” is received for these services. In addition, the Company incurs “agent expenses” where it hires a third-party collector to the IPO, including the ten months ended October 31, 2002, the tax accounts are pro forma disclosures only and not recorded on the books of the Company.

Advertising costs:Advertising costs are expensed when incurred.
52

Operating leases:General abatements or prepaid leasing costs are recognized on a straight-line basis over the life of the lease.

Capital leases:Leases are analyzed to determine if they meet the definition of a capital lease as defined in SFAS No. 13, “Accounting for Leases”. Those lease arrangements that meet one of the four criteria are considered capital leases. As such, the leased asset is capitalized and depreciated per Company policy. The lease is recorded as a liability with each payment amortizing the principal balance and a portion classified as interest expense.

45


 

Recovery Associates, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

effectuate repossession. In many cases the Company has an arrangement with its client which allows it to bill the client for these fees. The Company has determined these fees to be gross revenue based on the criteria in EITF 99-19 and they are recorded as such in the line item “Commissions,” primarily because the Company is primarily liable to the third party collector. There is a corresponding expense in “Outside Legal and Other Fees and Services” for these pass-through items.

Net gain on cash sales of finance receivables:The Company accounts for its gain on cash sales of finance receivables under SFAS No. 140, “Accounting for Transfers and Servicing of Financial Assets and Extinguishments of Liabilities.” Gains on sale of finance receivables, representing the difference between the sales price and the unamortized value of the finance receivables sold, are recognized when finance receivables are sold.

     The Company applies a financial components approach that focuses on control when accounting and reporting for transfers and servicing of financial assets and extinguishments of liabilities. Under that approach, after a transfer of financial assets, an entity recognizes the financial and servicing assets it controls and the liabilities it has incurred, eliminates financial assets when control has been surrendered, and eliminates liabilities when extinguished. This approach provides consistent standards for distinguishing transfers of financial assets that are sales from transfers that are secured borrowings.

Property and equipment:Property and equipment, including improvements that significantly add to the productive capacity or extend useful life, are recorded at cost, while maintenance and repairs are expensed currently. Property and equipment are depreciated over their useful lives using the straight-line method of depreciation. Software and computer equipment are depreciated over three to five years. Furniture and fixtures are depreciated over five years. Equipment is depreciated over five to seven years. Leasehold improvements are depreciated over the lessor of the useful life or the remaining life of the leased property, which ranges from three to ten years. Building improvements are depreciated over ten to thirty-nine years.

Intangible assets:The Company adopted SFAS No. 142, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets” (“SFAS 142”) on October 1, 2004. Prior to this date, the Company had no assets in this category. With the acquisition of IGS on October 1, 2004, the Company purchased certain tangible and intangible assets. Intangible assets purchased included client relationships, non-compete agreements and goodwill. In accordance with SFAS 142, the Company is amortizing the client relationships and non-compete agreements over seven and three years, respectively. In addition, goodwill, pursuant to FAS 142, is not amortized, but rather reviewed annually for impairment.

Income taxes:Taxes are provided on substantially all income and expense items included in earnings, regardless of the period in which such items are recognized for tax purposes. The Company uses an asset and liability approach that requires the recognition of deferred tax assets and liabilities for the estimated future tax consequences of events that have been recognized in the Company’s financial statements or tax returns. In estimating future tax consequences, the Company generally considers all expected future events other than enactments of changes in the tax laws or rates. The effect on deferred taxes of a change in tax rates is recognized in income in the period that includes the enactment date. For periods presented prior to the IPO, including the ten months ended October 31, 2002, the tax accounts are pro forma disclosures only and not recorded on the books of the Company.

     The Company is subject to compliance reviews by the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) and other taxing jurisdictions on various tax matters, including challenges to various positions the Company asserts in its filings. Certain tax contingencies are recognized when they are determined to be probable and reasonably estimable. The Company believes it has adequately accrued for tax contingencies that have met both the probable and reasonably estimable criteria. As of December 31, 2004, there are certain tax contingencies that either are not considered probable or are not reasonably estimable by the Company at this time. In the event that the IRS or another taxing jurisdiction levies an assessment in the future, it is possible the assessment could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s consolidated financial condition or results of operations.

Advertising costs:Advertising costs are expensed when incurred.

Operating leases:General abatements or prepaid leasing costs are recognized on a straight-line basis over the life of the lease.

53


Portfolio Recovery Associates, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Stock-based compensation:The Company applied the intrinsic value method provided for under Accounting Principles Board Opinion (“APB”) No. 25, “Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees,” for all warrants issued to employees prior to January 1, 2002. For warrants and options issued to non-employees, the Company followed the fair value method of accounting as prescribed under SFAS No. 123, “Accounting for Stock Based Compensation” (“SFAS 123”). On January 1, 2002 the Company adopted SFAS 123 on a prospective basis for all warrants and options granted and reported the change in accounting principle using the retroactive restatement method as prescribed in SFAS No. 148 “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation – Transition and Disclosure.” For warrants issued to employees prior to January 1, 2002, pro forma net income assuming the warrants were accounted for as prescribed by SFAS 123, has been disclosed in Note 12 to the financial statements.
Capital leases:Leases are analyzed to determine if they meet the definition of a capital lease as defined in SFAS No. 13, “Accounting for Leases.” Those lease arrangements that meet one of the four criteria are considered capital leases. As such, the leased asset is capitalized and depreciated. The lease is recorded as a liability with each payment amortizing the principal balance and a portion classified as interest expense.

Pro forma earnings per share:Basic earnings per share reflect net income adjusted for the pro forma income tax provision divided by the weighted average number of shares outstanding. Diluted earnings per share include the effect of dilutive stock options during the period. As of December 31, 2003, 55,000 stock options issued under the 2002 Stock Option Plan were antidilutive. These options may become dilutive in future years.
Stock-based compensation:The Company applied the intrinsic value method provided for under Accounting Principles Board Opinion (“APB”) No. 25, “Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees,” for all warrants issued to employees prior to January 1, 2002. For warrants and options issued to non-employees, the Company followed the fair value method of accounting as prescribed under SFAS No. 123, “Accounting for Stock Based Compensation” (“SFAS 123”). On January 1, 2002 the Company adopted SFAS 123 on a prospective basis for all warrants and options granted and reported the change in accounting principle using the retroactive restatement method as prescribed in SFAS No. 148 “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation – Transition and Disclosure.” For warrants issued to employees prior to January 1, 2002, pro forma net income assuming the warrants were accounted for as prescribed by SFAS 123, has been disclosed in Note 14 to the financial statements.

Use of estimates:The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Pro forma earnings (unaudited) per share:Basic earnings per share reflect net income adjusted for the pro forma income tax provision divided by the weighted average number of shares outstanding. Diluted earnings per share include the effect of dilutive stock options during the period. As of December 31, 2004, no stock options issued under the 2002 Stock Option Plan were antidilutive.

Significant estimates have been made by management with respect to the collectibility of future cash flows of portfolios. Actual results could differ from these estimates making it reasonably possible that a change in these estimates could occur within one year. On a monthly basis, management reviews the estimate of future collections, and it is reasonably possible that its assessment of collectibility may change based on actual results and other factors.
Use of estimates:The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Fair value of financial instruments: The company’s financial instruments consist of cash and cash equivalents, finance receivables, net, long-term debt, and obligations under capital leases. The fair value of cash and cash equivalents, long-term debt and obligations under capital leases approximates their respective carrying values. The Company considers it not practicable to perform a fair value calculation of the finance receivables due to the excessive cost that would be incurred.
     Significant estimates have been made by management with respect to the collectibility of future cash flows of portfolios. Actual results could differ from these estimates making it reasonably possible that a change in these estimates could occur within one year. On a monthly basis, management reviews the estimate of future collections, and whether it is reasonably possible that its assessment of collectibility may change based on actual results and other factors.

Reclassifications:Certain 2002 and 2001 amounts have been reclassified to conform to the 2003 presentation.
Estimated fair value of financial instruments: The Company applies the provisions of SFAS No. 107, “Disclosures About Fair Value of Financial Instruments,” to its financial instruments. Its financial instruments consist of cash and cash equivalents, investments, finance receivables, net, line of credit, long-term debt, and obligations under capital leases. See Note 13 for additional disclosure.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements:In January 2003, the FASB issued FIN No. 46, Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities. FIN No. 46 is an interpretation of ARB No. 51 and addresses consolidation by business enterprises of variable interest entities (“VIEs”). This interpretation is based on the theory that an enterprise controlling another entity through interests other than voting interests should consolidate the controlled entity. Business enterprises are required under the provisions of this interpretation to identify VIEs, based on specified characteristics, and then determine whether they should be consolidated. An enterprise that holds a majority of the variable interests is considered the primary beneficiary, the enterprise that should consolidate the VIE. The primary beneficiary of a VIE is also required to include various disclosures in interim and annual financial statements. Additionally, an enterprise that holds a significant variable interest in a VIE, but that is not the primary beneficiary, is also required to make certain disclosures. This interpretation is effective for all enterprises with variable interest in VIEs created after January 31, 2003. A public entity with variable interests in a VIE created before February 1, 2003, is required to apply the provisions of this interpretation to that entity by the end of the first interim or annual reporting period beginning after June 15, 2003. The adoption of this interpretation did not have a material impact on the Company’s financial position or the results of operations.
Reclassifications:Certain 2003 and 2002 amounts have been reclassified to conform to the 2004 presentation.

In October 2003, the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants issued Statement of Position (“SOP”) 03-03, “Accounting for Loans or Certain Securities Acquired in a Transfer.” This SOP provides guidance on accounting for differences between contractual and expected cash flows from an investors initial investment in loans or debt securities acquired in a transfer if those differences are attributable, at least in
Revision in the Classification of Certain Securities:In connection with the preparation of this report, the Company concluded that it was appropriate to classify its auction rate certificates as investments. Previously, such investments had been classified as cash and cash equivalents. Accordingly, the Company has revised the classification to report these securities as investments in its Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2004 and 2003. The Company has also made corresponding adjustments to its Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows for the periods ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002 to reflect the gross purchases and sales of these securities as investing activities rather than as a component of cash and cash equivalents. This change in classification does not affect previously reported cash flows from operations or from financing activities in its previously reported Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows, or previously reported Consolidated Income Statements for any period.

46     As of December 31, 2004 and 2003, the Company held auction rate securities of $23,950,000 and $0, respectively. For the fiscal years ended December 31, 2003 and 2002 net cash provided by (used in) investing activities related to these investments of $5,950,000 and ($5,950,000), respectively, were included in cash and cash equivalents in its Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows.

54


 

Portfolio Recovery Associates, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Recent Accounting Pronouncements :In October 2003, the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (“AICPA”) issued Statement of Position (“SOP”) 03-03, “Accounting for Loans or Certain Securities Acquired in a Transfer.” The SOP proposes guidance on accounting for differences between contractual and expected cash flows from an investor’s initial investment in loans or debt securities acquired in a transfer if those differences are attributable, at least in part, to credit quality. The SOP is effective for loans acquired in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2004 and amends Practice Bulletin 6 which remains in effect for loans acquired prior to the SOP effective date. The SOP would limit the revenue that may be accrued to the excess of the estimate of expected future cash flows over a portfolio’s initial cost of accounts receivable acquired. The SOP requires that the excess of the contractual cash flows over expected cash flows not be recognized as an adjustment of revenue, expense, or on the balance sheet. The SOP initially freezes the internal rate of return, referred to as IRR, originally estimated when the accounts receivable are purchased for subsequent impairment testing. Rather than lower the estimated IRR if the original collection estimates are not received, effective January 1, 2005, the carrying value of a portfolio will be written down to maintain the then-current IRR. The SOP also amends Practice Bulletin 6 in a similar manner and applies to all loans acquired prior to January 1, 2005. Increases in expected future cash flows will be recognized prospectively through an upward adjustment of the IRR over a portfolio’s remaining life. Any increased yield then becomes the new benchmark for impairment testing. The SOP provides that previously issued annual financial statements would not need to be restated. Historically, the Company has applied the guidance of Practice Bulletin 6, and has moved yields upward and downward as appropriate under that guidance. However, since the new SOP guidance does not permit yields to be lowered, under either the revised Practice Bulletin 6 or SOP 03-03, it will increase the probability that the Company will have to incur impairment charges in the future.

     On December 16, 2004, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued FASB statement No. 123(R), “Share-Based Payment,” (“FAS 123R”). FAS 123R revises FASB statement No. 123, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation,” (“FAS 123”) and requires companies to expense the fair value of employee stock options and other forms of stock-based compensation. In addition to revising FAS 123, FAS 123R supersedes Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25, “Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees” and amends FASB Statement No. 95, “Statement of Cash Flows.” FAS 123R applies to all stock-based compensation transactions in which a company acquires services by (1) issuing its stock or other equity instruments, except through arrangements resulting from employee stock-ownership plans (ESOPs) or (2) incurring liabilities that are based on the company’s stock price. FAS 123R is effective for periods that begin after June 15, 2005; however, early adoption is encouraged. The Company believes that all of its existing stock-based awards are equity instruments. The Company previously adopted FAS 123 on January 1, 2002 and has been expensing equity based compensation since that time. Management believes the adoption of FAS 123R will have no material impact on its financial statements.

3.  part, to credit quality. This SOP is effective for loans acquired in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2004. The SOP would limit the revenue that may be accrued to the excess of the estimate of expected future cash flows over a portfolio’s initial cost of accounts receivable acquired. The SOP would require that the excess of the contractual cash flows over expected future cash flows not be recognized as an adjustment of revenue, expense, or on the balance sheet. The SOP would freeze the internal rate of return, referred to as IRR, originally estimated when the accounts receivable are purchased for subsequent impairment testing. Rather than lower the estimated IRR if the original collection estimates are not received, the carrying value of a portfolio would be written down to maintain the original IRR. Increases in expected future cash flows would be recognized prospectively through adjustment of the IRR over a portfolio’s remaining life. The SOP provides that previously issued annual financial statements would not need to be restated. Management is in the process of evaluating the application of this SOP.Finance Receivables:

3.Finance Receivables:

As of December 31, 2004 and 2003, the Company had $105,188,906 and $92,568,557, respectively, remaining of finance receivables. These amounts represent 514 and 412 pools of accounts as of December 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively. Changes in finance receivables at December 31, 2004 and 2003, and 2002, the Company had $92,568,557 and $65,526,235, respectively, remaining of finance receivables. These amounts represent 412 and 330 pools of accounts as of December 31, 2003 and 2002, respectively.

Changes in finance receivables at December 31, 2003 and 2002, were as follows:

         
 2003 2002        
     2004 2003 
Balance at beginning of yearBalance at beginning of year $65,526,235 $47,986,744  $92,568,557 $65,526,235 
Acquisitions of finance receivables, net of buybacksAcquisitions of finance receivables, net of buybacks 62,298,316 42,990,924  59,770,354 62,298,316 
  
Cash collectionsCash collections  (117,052,203)  (79,253,551)  (153,404,446)  (117,052,203)
Income recognized on finance receivablesIncome recognized on finance receivables 81,796,209 53,802,718  106,254,441 81,796,209 
 
 
      
Cash collections applied to principal  (35,255,994)  (25,450,833)
 
Cost of finance receivables sold, net of allowance for returns   (600)
 
 
 
Cash collections applied to principal  (47,150,005)  (35,255,994)
  
Balance at end of yearBalance at end of year $92,568,557 $65,526,235  $105,188,906 $92,568,557 
 
 
      

At the time of acquisition, the life of each pool is generally set at between 60 and 72 months based upon the proprietary models of the Company. As of December 31, 2003 the Company had $92,568,557 in finance receivables included in the Statement of Financial Position. Based upon current projections, cash collections applied to principal will be as follows for the twelve months in the years ending:

     
December 31, 2004 $32,707,264 
December 31, 2005  27,244,198 
December 31, 2006  18,245,994 
December 31, 2007  10,590,660 
December 31, 2008  3,120,910 
December 31, 2009  659,531 
   
 
  $92,568,557 
   
 
55

47


 

Portfolio Recovery Associates, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

4.Operating Leases:

The Company rents office space and equipment under operating leases. Rental expense was $1,028,530, $668,795, and $602,783 for the years ended December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001, respectively.

Future minimum lease payments at December 31, 2003, are as follows:
     At the time of acquisition, the life of each pool is generally estimated to be between 72 and 84 months based on projected amounts and timing of future cash receipts using the proprietary models of the Company. As of December 31, 2004 the Company had $105,188,906 in finance receivables included in the Balance Sheet. Based upon current projections, cash collections applied to principal will be as follows for the twelve months in the years ending:

      
 2004 $1,391,115 
 2005  1,467,992 
 2006  1,469,758 
 2007  1,510,940 
 2008  1,553,787 
Thereafter  6,952,595 
   
 
     
  $14,346,186 
   
 
     
December 31, 2005 $30,473,511 
December 31, 2006  30,643,239 
December 31, 2007  25,768,520 
December 31, 2008  12,340,256 
December 31, 2009  4,667,180 
December 31, 2010  1,078,347 
December 31, 2011  217,853 
    
  $105,188,906 
    

5.4.CapitalOperating Leases:

Leased assets included in property and equipment consist of the following:
     The Company rents office space and equipment under operating leases. Rental expense was $1,520,100, $1,028,530, and $668,795 for the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively.

     Future minimum lease payments at December 31, 2004, are as follows:

         
  2003 2002
     
Software $270,008  $270,008 
Computer equipment  61,086   178,893 
Furniture and fixtures  963,377   600,564 
Equipment  27,249   27,249 
Less accumulated depreciation  (607,591)  (461,326)
   
   
 
         
  $714,129  $615,388 
   
   
 
     
2005 $1,657,219 
2006  1,479,298 
2007  1,520,480 
2008  1,563,327 
2009  1,602,318 
Thereafter  5,350,277 
    
     
  $13,172,919 
    

5.  Depreciation expense recognized on capital leases for the years ended December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001 was $210,101, $213,016, and $238,719, respectively.Acquisition of IGS:

Commitments for minimum annual rental payments for these leases as of December 31, 2003 are as follows:
     On October 1, 2004, the Company acquired substantially all of the assets of IGS Nevada, Inc. for consideration of $14 million, consisting of $12 million in cash and 69,914 shares of our common stock (less than one-half of one percent of the issued and outstanding shares of our common stock), valued at $2 million at the closing in accordance with the calculation set forth in the asset purchase agreement. The assets acquired from IGS Nevada, Inc. consisted of accounts receivable, client relationships, fixed assets, non-competition protection and goodwill. The Company also agreed to collect on behalf of the seller, on a fee-for-service basis, certain accounts receivable not acquired in the acquisition and remit the proceeds, less a collection fee, to the seller. The total purchase price could increase by $4 million through performance contingency payments of $2 million each, in 2005 and 2006. These contingent payments will be recorded as an increase to the purchase price if and when the specific earnings levels are achieved.

     The following is an allocation of the purchase price to the assets acquired of IGS Nevada, Inc.:

     
2004 $249,262 
2005  150,993 
2006  87,524 
2007  80,160 
2008  31,569 
   
 
     
   599,508 
Less amount representing interest and taxes  48,183 
   
 
     
Present value of net minimum lease payments $551,325 
   
 
     
Purchase price including acquisition costs $14,147,138 
Accounts receivable (included in other assets)  (850,000)
Client relationships  (5,000,000)
Non-compete agreements  (1,800,000)
Fixed Assets  (100,000)
    
     
Goodwill $6,397,138 
    

6.401(k) Retirement Plan:
56

Effective October 1, 1998, the Company sponsors a defined contribution plan. Under the Plan, all employees over twenty-one years of age are eligible to make voluntary contributions to the Plan up to 15% of their compensation, subject to Internal Revenue Service limitations after completing six months of service, as defined in the Plan. On January 1, 2004, the Company amended the Plan to allow employees to make voluntary contributions up to 100% of their compensation, subject to Internal Revenue Service limitations. The Company makes matching contributions of

48


 

Portfolio Recovery Associates, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

     IGS specializes in the location of collateral, securing primarily automobile loans. Based in Las Vegas, Nevada, IGS has a workforce of approximately 35 employees. IGS Nevada’s founder and his management team have joined the Company and have executed employment and non-competition agreements. The income statement includes the results of operations of IGS for the period from October 1, 2004 through December 31, 2004.

6.  up to 4% of an employee’s salary. Total compensation expense related to these contributions was $284,017, $265,510, and $198,691 for the years ended December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001, respectively.Intangible Assets:

7.Revolving Lines of Credit:
     Upon the acquisition of substantially all of the assets of IGS Nevada, Inc., the Company obtained a third-party valuation of intangible assets. The valuation assigned $6.8 million to amortizable assets and $6.4 million to goodwill, a non-amortizable asset. The amortization periods of the intangible assets are three and seven years, with a weighted average amortization period of 5.9 years.

On September 18, 2001, PRA III arranged with a commercial lender to provide financing under a revolving line of credit of up to $40 million. The initial draw of $20 million was utilized to facilitate the purchase of all finance receivable portfolios from PRA and PRA II. PRA then used those funds to terminate an existing line of credit agreement. An additional $5 million was drawn in the initial funding to purchase additional portfolios from third parties in the normal course of business. Interest is based on LIBOR and was 6.17% at December 31, 2002. Restrictive covenants under this agreement include:

Restrictions on monthly borrowings in excess     Intangible assets consist of $4 million per month and quarterly borrowings in excess of $10 million;the following at December 31, 2004:
     
Client relationships $5,000,000 
Non-compete agreements  1,800,000 
Accumulated amortization  (481,162)
    
Intangible assets, net $6,318,838 
    

A maximum leverage ratio of not greater than 4     Amortization expense was $481,162 for the year ended December 31, 2004.

     Amortization expense relating to 1 and net income of at least $0.01,the non-compete agreements is calculated on a consolidated basis;straight-line method. Amortization expense relating to the client relationships is calculated using a pattern of economic benefit concept. The economic benefit concept relies on expected net cash flows from all existing clients. The rate of amortization of the client relationships will fluctuate annually to match these expected cash flows. The future amortization of these intangible assets is as follows as of December 31, 2004:

     
2005 $1,779,431 
2006  1,283,909 
2007  1,003,118 
2008  693,201 
2009  647,431 
Thereafter  911,748 
    
  $6,318,838 
    

Restrictions     The client relationships asset is related to existing client relationships. These clients, in general, may terminate their relationship with the Company on distributions90 days prior notice. In the event a client or clients terminate or significantly cut back its relationship with the Company, it could potentially give rise to an impairment charge related to the intangible asset specifically ascribed to existing client relationships.

     In addition to amortizable intangible assets, the acquisition of IGS Nevada, Inc., resulted in excessgoodwill of 75%$6,397,138. Goodwill is reviewed annually to determine any need for impairment. Generally, impairment is required if the fair value of the acquired assets is less then the book value of the goodwill at the time of assessment or if there is a changing event prior to the annual net income;

assessment that would lead to impairment of goodwill. The Company conducts its review of goodwill annually on October 1. The Company recognized no impairment charges for the year ended December 31, 2004. The Company believes goodwill will be fully deductible for tax purposes.

Compliance with certain special purpose vehicle and corporate separateness covenants; and57

Restrictions on change of control.

As of December 31, 2002 the Company was in compliance with all of the covenants of this agreement. Upon consummation of the reorganization discussed in Note 1, a waiver would have been required in order to remain in compliance with the terms of the agreement. On October 18, 2002 Westside Funding (“Westside”) acknowledged our notification letter and provided several options that would be acceptable for Westside. On November 19, 2002 Westside provided their letter of intent to amend the Loan and Security agreement dated September 18, 2001 and they began drafting that amendment. On December 18, 2002 the Loan and Security amendment was finalized. The balance on this facility was paid off on November 14, 2002 with proceeds obtained from the IPO. The Loan and Security agreement dated December 18, 2002 modified certain terms of the loan agreement in keeping with the Company’s reduced borrowing needs following the IPO. Modifications include a reduction in the facility size from $40 million to $25 million, a $75,000 modification fee, a reduction in the borrowing spread, a reduction in certain monthly fees, and an increase in the facility’s non-use fee when the amount outstanding is less than $10 million.

On November 28, 2003 this facility was terminated, in favor of the RBC Centura Bank (“RBC”) line.

The Company maintains a $25.0 million revolving line of credit with RBC pursuant to an agreement entered into on November 28, 2003. The credit facility bears interest at a spread over LIBOR and extends through November 28, 2004. The agreement provides for:

restrictions on monthly borrowings are limited to 20% of Estimated Remaining Collections;

a debt coverage ratio of at least 8.0 to 1.0 calculated on a rolling twelve-month average;

a debt to tangible net worth ratio of less than 0.40 to 1.00;

net income per quarter of at least $1.00, calculated on a consolidated basis, and;

restrictions on change of control.

This facility had no amounts outstanding at December 31, 2003.

49


 

Portfolio Recovery Associates, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

7.  In addition, PRA Funding, LLC maintained a $2.5 million revolving line of credit, with a commercial lender which extended through September 2003. This $2.5 million facility had no amounts outstanding as of December 31, 2002 and was terminated in 2003.Capital Leases:

8.Property and equipment:
     Leased assets included in property and equipment consist of the following:

         
  2004  2003 
Software $270,008  $270,008 
Computer equipment  60,369   61,086 
Furniture and fixtures  1,260,287   963,377 
Equipment  27,249   27,249 
Less accumulated depreciation  (862,616)  (607,591)
       
         
  $755,297  $714,129 
       

Property and equipment, at cost, consist of the following as of December 31, 2003 and 2002:
     Depreciation expense recognized on capital leases for the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002 was $255,025, $210,101, and $213,016, respectively.

Commitments for minimum annual rental payments for these leases as of December 31, 2004 are as follows:

          
   2003 2002
     
Software $2,030,403   1,431,938 
Computer equipment  2,193,386   1,435,795 
Furniture and fixtures  1,283,748   942,178 
Equipment  1,602,547   1,037,372 
Leasehold improvements  801,516   343,329 
Building and improvements  1,138,924   1,136,762 
Land  100,515   100,515 
 Less accumulated depreciation  (3,984,659)  (2,633,635)
   
   
 
Net property and equipment $5,166,380  $3,794,254 
   
   
 
     
2005 $219,373 
2006  155,904 
2007  148,539 
2008  99,949 
2009  5,698 
    
     
   629,463 
Less amount representing interest and taxes  53,229 
    
     
Present value of net minimum lease payments $576,234 
    

9.8.Loss on Extinguishment of Debt:401(k) Retirement Plan:

During 2001 PRA restructured its debt position which gave rise to a loss on extinguishment of debt. The first item resulted from the termination of the line of credit dated May 2000. The company paid off $20 million in outstanding debt and expensed $231,564 of remaining unamortized acquisition costs. The second item resulted from the termination of the credit facility from the affiliated lender dated December 1999. PRA paid off all existing loans under this facility ($1,941,119) and incurred a loss on the extinguishment of the contingent interest provision of $191,741.
     Effective October 1, 1998, the Company sponsors a defined contribution plan. Under the Plan, all employees over twenty-one years of age are eligible to make voluntary contributions to the Plan up to 100% of their compensation, subject to Internal Revenue Service limitations after completing six months of service, as defined in the Plan. The Company makes matching contributions of up to 4% of an employee’s salary. Total compensation expense related to these contributions was $434,778, $317,018, and $268,415 for the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively.

10.Hedging Activity:
58

During 2001, PRA entered into an interest rate swap for the purpose of managing exposure to fluctuations in interest rates related to variable rate financing. The interest rate swap effectively fixed the interest rate on $10 million of PRA’s outstanding debt. The swap required payment or receipt of the difference between a fixed rate of 5.33% and a variable rate of interest based on 1-month LIBOR. The unrealized gains and losses associated with the change in market value of the interest rate swap were recognized as other comprehensive income. This swap transaction, which was to expire in May 2004, was paid in full and terminated in September 2002.

The only expenses incurred related to the swap agreement were interest expenses of $0, $792,047 and $118,924 for the years ended December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001, respectively. The interest paid in 2002 represents monthly interest plus the final extinguishment amount of $541,762. The net interest payments are a component of “Interest Expense.”

11.Long-Term Debt:

In July 2000, the Company purchased a building in Hutchinson, Kansas. The building was financed with a commercial loan for $550,000 with a variable interest rate based on LIBOR. This commercial loan is collateralized by the real estate in Kansas. Interest rates varied between 3.35% and 3.79% during 2003 and 3.74% and 4.47% during 2002. Monthly principal payments on the loan are $4,583 for an amortized term of 10 years. A balloon payment of $275,000 is due July 21, 2005, which results in a five-year principal payout. The loan matures July 21, 2005.

On February 9, 2001, the Company purchased a generator for its Norfolk location. The generator was financed with a commercial loan for $107,000 with a fixed rate of 7.9%. This commercial loan is

50


 

Portfolio Recovery Associates, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

9.  Revolving Line of Credit:

     The Company maintains a $25.0 million revolving line of credit with RBC pursuant to an agreement entered into on November 28, 2003. On November 22, 2004, the Company amended this revolving line of credit agreement by entering into an Amended and Restated Commercial Promissory Note with RBC. The only material change to the original agreement was the extension of the maturity date to November 28, 2006. Other terms of the original agreement, including the rate of interest, payment terms and available credit, remain the same. The credit facility bears interest at a spread of 2.50% over LIBOR and extends through November 28, 2006. The agreement provides for:

  collateralized by the generator. Monthly paymentsrestrictions on the loanmonthly borrowings are $2,170 and the loan matures on February 1, 2006.limited to 20% of Estimated Remaining Collections;

  On February 20, 2002, the Company completed the constructiona debt coverage ratio of at least 8.0 to 1.0 calculated on a satellite parking lot at its Norfolk location. The parking lot was financed with a commercial loan for $500,000 with a fixed rate of 6.47%. The loan is collateralized by the parking lot. The loan required only interest payments during the first six months. Beginning October 1, 2002, monthly payments on the loan are $9,797 and the loan matures on September 1, 2007.rolling twelve-month average;

  On May 1, 2003, the Company secured financing for its computer equipment purchases relateda debt to the Hampton, Virginia office opening. The computer equipment was financed with a commercial loan for $975,000 with a fixed ratetangible net worth ratio of 4.25%. This loan is collaterized by computer equipment. Monthly payments are $18,096 and the loan matures on May 1, 2008.less than 0.40 to 1.00;

  Annual paymentsnet income per quarter of at least $1.00, calculated on all loans outstanding as of December 31, 2003 are as follows:

      
2004 $429,643 
2005  680,405 
2006  339,059 
2007  295,530 
2008  72,385 
Thereafter   
   
 
     
   1,817,022 
Less amount representing interest  (160,050)
   
 
     
 Principal due $1,656,972 
   
 

These four loans are collateralized by property and buildings that have a book value of $2,031,553 and $1,104,012 as of December 31, 2003 and 2002, respectively.consolidated basis, and;

12.•  Stock-Based Compensationrestrictions on change of control.

This facility had no amounts outstanding at December 31, 2004.

     Prior to the completion of the IGS acquisition, the Company obtained a waiver of the permitted acquisitions limitation, from RBC, related to the acquisition.

10.  The Company has a stock warrant planProperty and a stock option plan. Prior to 2002, the Company accounted for stock compensation issued under the recognition and measurement provisions of APB Opinion No. 25, “Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees,” and related Interpretations. Effective January 1, 2002, the Company adopted the fair value recognition provisions of SFAS 123, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation,” prospectively to all employee awards granted, modified, or settled after January 1, 2002. Therefore, the cost related to stock-based employee compensation included in the determination of net income for 2001 is less than that which would have been recognized if the fair value based method had been applied to all awards since the original effective date of SFAS 123.equipment:

51     Property and equipment, at cost, consist of the following as of December 31, 2004 and 2003:

         
  December 31,  December 31, 
  2004  2003 
Software $2,550,224  $2,030,403 
Computer equipment  2,964,333   2,193,386 
Furniture and fixtures  1,729,792   1,283,748 
Equipment  1,876,081   1,602,547 
Leasehold improvements  1,146,489   801,516 
Building and improvements  1,142,017   1,138,924 
Land  150,922   100,515 
Less accumulated depreciation  (5,807,369)  (3,984,659)
       
         
Property and equipment, net $5,752,489  $5,166,380 
       

11.Hedging Activity:

     During 2001, PRA entered into an interest rate swap for the purpose of managing exposure to fluctuations in interest rates related to variable rate financing. The interest rate swap effectively fixed the interest rate on $10 million of PRA’s outstanding debt. The swap required payment or receipt of the difference between a fixed rate of 5.33% and a variable rate of interest based on 1-month LIBOR. The unrealized gains and losses associated with the change in market value of the interest rate swap were recognized as other comprehensive income. This swap transaction, which was to expire in May 2004, was paid in full and terminated in September 2002.

     Interest expense incurred related to the swap agreement was $792,047 for the year ended December 31, 2002. Interest paid in 2002 represents monthly interest plus the final extinguishment amount of $541,762. The net interest payments are a component of “Interest Expense.”

59


 

Portfolio Recovery Associates, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

12.Long-Term Debt:

     In July 2000, the Company purchased a building in Hutchinson, Kansas. The building was financed with a commercial loan for $550,000 with a variable interest rate based on LIBOR. This commercial loan is collateralized by the real estate in Kansas. Interest rates varied between 3.23% and 4.35% during 2004 and 3.35% and 3.79% during 2003. Monthly principal payments on the loan are $4,583 for an amortized term of 10 years. A balloon payment of $275,000 is due July 21, 2005, which results in a five-year principal payout. The loan matures July 21, 2005.

     On February 9, 2001, the Company purchased a generator for its Norfolk location. The generator was financed with a commercial loan for $107,000 with a fixed rate of 7.9%. This commercial loan is collateralized by the generator. Monthly payments on the loan are $2,170 and the loan matures on February 1, 2006.

     On February 20, 2002, the Company completed the construction of a satellite parking lot at its Norfolk location. The parking lot was financed with a commercial loan for $500,000 with a fixed rate of 6.47%. The loan is collateralized by the parking lot. The loan required only interest payments during the first six months. Beginning October 1, 2002, monthly payments on the loan are $9,797 and the loan matures on September 1, 2007.

     On May 1, 2003, the Company secured financing for its computer equipment purchases related to the Hampton, Virginia office opening. The computer equipment was financed with a commercial loan for $975,000 with a fixed rate of 4.25%. This loan is collaterized by computer equipment. Monthly payments are $18,096 and the loan matures on May 1, 2008.

     On January 9, 2004, the Company entered into a commercial loan agreement in the amount of $750,000 to finance equipment purchases at its newly leased Norfolk facility. This loan bears interest at a fixed rate of 4.45%, matures on January 1, 2009 and is collateralized by the purchased equipment.

     Annual payments on all loans outstanding as of December 31, 2004 are as follows:

     
2005 $848,801 
2006  506,757 
2007  463,228 
2008  240,083 
2009  13,975 
    
   2,072,844 
Less amount representing interest  (148,422)
    
     
Principal due $1,924,422 
    

     These five loans are collateralized by property and buildings that have a book value of $1,805,636 and $2,031,553 as of December 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively. The loans require the Company to maintain net worth greater than $20 million and a cash flow coverage ratio of at least 1.5 to 1.0 calculated on a rolling twelve-month average.

13.Estimated Fair Value of Financial Instruments:

     The accompanying financial statements include various estimated fair value information as of December 31, 2004, as required by SFAS No. 107, “Disclosures About Fair Value of Financial Instruments.” Disclosure of the estimated fair values of financial instruments often requires the use of estimates. The Company uses the following methods and assumptions to estimate the fair value of financial instruments.

Cash and cash equivalents:The carrying amount approximates fair value.

Investments:The carrying amount approximates fair value.

60


Portfolio Recovery Associates, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Finance receivables, net:The Company records purchased receivables at cost, which represents a significant discount from the contractual receivable balances due. The cost of the receivables are reduced as cash is received based upon the guidance of Practice Bulletin 6. The balance at December 31, 2004 was $105,188,906. The Company computed the fair value of these receivables using our proprietary pricing models that the Company utilizes to make portfolio purchase decisions. At December 31, 2004, using the aforementioned methodology, we computed the fair value to be $148,726,542. Under this methodology, it was not practicable to compute this as of December 31, 2003.

Long-term debt:The carrying amount of the Company’s long-term debt approximates fair value.

Obligations under capital lease:The carrying amount of the Company’s obligations under capital lease approximates fair value.

14. Stock-Based Compensation:

The Company has a stock warrant plan and a stock option plan. The Amended and Restated Portfolio Recovery 2002 Stock Option Plan and 2004 Restricted Stock Plan was approved by the Company’s shareholders at its Annual Meeting of Shareholders on May 12, 2004, enabling the Company to issue to its employees and directors restricted shares of stock, as well as stock options. Also, in connection with the IPO, all existing PRA warrants that were owned by certain individuals and entities were exchanged for an equal number of PRA Inc warrants. Prior to 2002, the Company accounted for stock compensation issued under the recognition and measurement provisions of APB Opinion No. 25, “Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees,” and related Interpretations.

     Effective January 1, 2002, the Company adopted the fair value recognition provisions of SFAS 123, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation,” prospectively to all employee awards granted, modified, or settled after January 1, 2002. All stock-based compensation measured under the provisions of APB 25 became fully vested during 2002. All stock-based compensation expense recognized thereafter was derived from stock-based compensation based on the fair value method prescribed in SFAS 123 .

     Total stock-based compensation was $749,754, $456,340 and $73,180 for the years ended December 31, 2004 and 2003 and 2002, respectively.

61


Portfolio Recovery Associates, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

The following table illustrates the effect on net income and earnings per share if the fair value based method had been applied to all outstanding and unvested awards in each period.

            
 For the Year For the Year For the Year            
 Ended Ended Ended For the Year For the Year For the Year 
 December 31, December 31, December 31, Ended Ended Ended 
 2003 2002 2001 December 31, December 31, December 31, 
       2004 2003 2002 
Net income/Pro forma net income:Net income/Pro forma net income:  
As reportedAs reported $20,713,503 $11,371,321 $3,525,725  $27,451,440 $20,713,503 $11,371,321 
Add: Stock-based employee compensation expense included in reported net income, net of related tax effects 272,828 29,733  
Add: Stock-based compensation expense included in reported net income, net of related tax effects 458,941 272,828 44,889 
Less: Total stock based compensation expense determined under intrinsic value method for all awards, net of related tax effectsLess: Total stock based compensation expense determined under intrinsic value method for all awards, net of related tax effects  (272,828)  (29,733)  (8,054)  (458,941)  (272,828)  (65,777)
 
 
 
        
Pro forma net incomePro forma net income $20,713,503 $11,371,321 $3,517,671  $27,451,440 $20,713,503 $11,350,433 
 
 
 
        
  
Earnings per share:Earnings per share:  
Basic — as reported $1.79 $1.42 $1.08 
Basic — pro forma $1.79 $1.42 $1.08 
Basic — as reported $1.42 $1.08 $0.35  
Basic — pro forma $1.42 $1.08 $0.35 
Diluted — as reported $1.32 $0.94 $0.31 
Diluted — pro forma $1.32 $0.94 $0.31 
Diluted — as reported $1.73 $1.32 $0.94 
Diluted — pro forma $1.73 $1.32 $0.94 

Stock Warrants

The     Prior to the IPO, the PRA management committee was authorized to issue warrants to partners, employees or vendors to purchase membership units. Generally, warrants granted had a term between 5five and 7seven years and vested within 3three years. Warrants had been issued at or above the fair market value on the date of grant. Warrants vest and expire according to terms established at the grant date. All warrants became fully vested at the Company’s IPO in 2002.

5262


 

Portfolio Recovery Associates, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

The following summarizes all warrant related transactions from December 31, 20002001 through December 31, 2003:31,2004:

               
 Weighted Weighted 
 Average Average 
 Warrants Exercise Warrants Exercise 
 Outstanding Price Outstanding Price 
    
December 31, 2000 2,160,000 $4.17 
Granted 155,000 4.20 
Cancelled  (120,000) 4.20 
 
 
 
December 31, 2001 2,195,000 4.17 
December 31,2001 2,195,000 $4.17 
Granted 50,000 10.00  50,000 10.00 
Exercised  (50,000) 4.20   (50,000) 4.20 
Cancelled  (10,000) 4.20   (10,000) 4.20 
 
 
      
December 31, 2002 2,185,000 4.30 
December 31,2002 2,185,000 4.30 
Exercised  (2,026,000) 4.17   (2,026,000) 4.17 
Cancelled  (51,500) 9.72   (51,500) 9.72 
 
 
      
December 31, 2003 107,500 $4.20 
December 31,2003 107,500 4.20 
Exercised  (67,500) 4.20 
 
 
      
December 31,2004 40,000 $4.20 
     

The following information is as of December 31, 2003:2004:

                   
 Warrants Outstanding Warrants Exercisable
 
 
                    
 Weighted-     Warrants Outstanding Warrants Exercisable 
 Average Weighted- Weighted- Weighted-Average Weighted- Weighted- 
 Remaining Average Average Remaining Average Average 
ExerciseExercise Number Contractual Exercise Number Exercise Number Contractual Exercise Number Exercise 
PricesPrices Outstanding Life Price Exercisable Price Outstanding Life Price Exercisable Price 
$4.20 40,000 1.27 $4.20 40,000 $4.20 
                     
Total at December 31, 2004 40,000 1.27 $4.20 40,000 $4.20 
$4.20 107,500 2.28 $4.20 107,500 $4.20            
  
 
 
 
 
 
Total at December 31, 2003 107,500 2.28 $4.20 107,500 $4.20 
  
 
 
 
 
 

Had compensation cost for warrants granted under the Agreement, prior to January 1, 2002, been determined pursuant to SFAS 123, the Company’s net income would have decreased. UsingThe Company used a fair-value (minimum value calculation), to calculate the value of the 2002 warrant grants. The following assumptions were used:

     
Warrants issue year: 2002 2001
Expected life from vest date (in years) 3.00 4.00
Risk-free interest rates 4.53% 4.66%-4.77%
Volatility N/A N/A
Dividend yield N/A N/A
Warrants issue year:2002
Expected life from vest date (in years)3.00
Risk-free interest rates4.53%
VolatilityN/A
Dividend yieldN/A

The fair value model utilizes the risk-free interest rate at grant with an expected exercise date sometime in the future generally assuming an exercise date in the first half of 2005. In addition, warrant valuation models require the input of highly subjective assumptions, including the expected exercise date and risk-free interest rates. Prior to the IPO, the Company’s warrants had characteristics significantly different from those of traded warrants, and changes in the subjective input assumptions can materially affect the fair value estimate. Based upon the above assumptions, the weighted average fair value of employee warrants granted during the yearsyear ended December 31, 2002 and 2001 was $1.24 and $0.35, respectively.$1.24.

5363


 

Portfolio Recovery Associates, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Effective December 30, 1999, the Company issued warrants to acquire 125,000 membership units to an affiliate of Angelo, Gordon & Co. The warrants immediately vested and were exercisable at $3.60 per unit. As these warrants were not issued as compensation to an employee or operating member of the Company, an expense of $0, $17,069, and $17,069 was recognized in the years ended December 31, 2003, 2002, and 2001, respectively. The value of the warrants was calculated using the fair value approach as designated by SFAS 123 which utilizes a comparison of the discounted value of the underlying units discounted using a risk-free interest rate at the date of grant. All warrants issued to AG 1999 were exercised in 2003 and none remain outstanding as of December 31, 2003.

Effective August 18, 1999, the Company issued warrants to acquire 200,000 membership units of PRA to SMR Research Corporation. The warrants were to vest over a 60 month period and were exercisable at $4.20 per unit. The warrants vested as to 80,000 membership units and the remaining 120,000 membership units were cancelled upon the termination of an agreement between the Company and SMR Research Corporation. The value of the warrants was calculated using the intrinsic method and no expense was recognized on these warrants. The fair value approach was then applied, as designated by SFAS 123, which utilizes a comparison of the discounted value of the underlying units discounted using a risk-free interest rate at the date of grant. As a result, these warrants were shown to have a negative present value, and as such no expense has been recorded. All warrants issued to SMR Research Corporation have been exercised or cancelled and none remain outstanding as of December 31, 2003.

Stock Options

The Company created the 2002 Stock Option Plan (the “Plan”) on November 7, 2002. The Plan was amended in 2004 to enable the Company to issue restricted shares of stock to its employees and directors. The Amended Plan was approved by the Company’s shareholders at its Annual Meeting on May 12, 2004. Up to 2,000,000 shares of common stock may be issued under this program.the Amended Plan. The Amended Plan expires November 7, 2012. All options issued under the Amended Plan vest ratably over 5five years. Granted options expire seven years from grant date. Expiration dates range between November 7, 2009 and July 31, 2010. No grant of optionsJanuary 16, 2011. Options granted to a single person cancannot exceed 200,000 in a single year. As of December 31, 2003, 875,0002004, 895,000 options have been granted under the Plan of which 26,17574,115 have been cancelled.cancelled and are eligible for regrant. These options are accounted for under SFAS 123 and all expenses for 2004, 2003 and 2002 are included in earnings as a component of compensation.compensation and employee services expense.

The following summarizes all option related transactions from December 31, 2001 through December 31, 2003:2004:

        
 Weighted        
 Average Weighted 
 Options Exercise Average 
 Outstanding Price Options Exercise 
     Outstanding Price 
December 31, 2001  $   $ 
Granted 820,000 13.06  820,000 13.06 
Cancelled  (12,150) 13.00   (12,150) 13.00 
 
 
      
December 31, 2002 807,850 13.06 
December 31,2002 807,850 13.06 
Granted 55,000 27.88  55,000 27.88 
Exercised  (50,915) 13.00   (50,915) 13.00 
Cancelled  (14,025) 13.00   (14,025) 13.00 
 
 
      
December 31, 2003 797,910 $14.09 
December 31,2003 797,910 14.09 
Granted 20,000 28.79 
Exercised  (63,511) 13.30 
Cancelled  (47,940) 13.00 
 
 
      
December 31,2004 706,459 $14.65 
     

All of the stock options were issued to employees of the Company except for 20,00040,000 that were issued to non-employee directors. Non-employee directors received 20,000, 0 and 20,000 stock options during the boardyears ending December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively.

     The following information is as of directors.December 31, 2004:

                     
  Options Outstanding  Options Exercisable 
      Weighted-           
      Average  Weighted-      Weighted- 
      Remaining  Average      Average 
Exercise Number  Contractual  Exercise  Number  Exercise 
Prices Outstanding  Life  Price  Exercisable  Price 
$13.00  618,459   4.7  $13.00   189,579  $13.00 
$16.16  14,000   4.9  $16.16   5,000  $16.16 
$27.77 - $29.79  74,000   5.7  $28.11   10,000  $27.77 
                
Total at December 31, 2004  706,459   4.8  $14.65   204,579  $13.80 
                

5464


 

Portfolio Recovery Associates, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

The following information is as of December 31, 2003:

                     
  Options Outstanding Options Exercisable
  
 
      Weighted-        
      Average Weighted-     Weighted-
      Remaining Average     Average
Exercise Number Contractual Exercise Number Exercise
Prices Outstanding Life Price Exercisable Price
           
$13.00  727,910   5.86  $13.00   104,930  $13.00 
$16.16  15,000   5.89  $16.16   3,000  $16.16 
$27.77  50,000   6.59  $27.88     $27.77 
$28.98  5,000   6.54  $28.98     $28.98 
   
   
   
   
   
 
Total at December 31, 2003  797,910   5.91  $14.09   107,930  $13.09 
   
   
   
   
   
 

The Company utilizes the Black-Scholes option-pricing model to calculate the value of the stock options when granted. This model was developed to estimate the fair value of traded options, which have different characteristics than employee stock options. In addition, changes to the subjective input assumptions can result in materially different fair market value estimates. Therefore, the Black-Scholes model may not necessarily provide a reliable single measure of the fair value of employee stock options.

          
Options issue year: 2003 2002 2004 2003 2002
Weighted average fair value of options granted $5.84 $2.73 $2.85 $5.84 $2.73
Expected volatility 15.70% - 15.73% 15.70% 13.26% - 13.55% 15.70% - 15.73% 15.70%
Risk-free interest rate 2.92% - 3.19% 2.92% 3.16% - 3.37% 2.92% - 3.19% 2.92%
Expected dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
Expected life (in years) 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00

Utilizing these assumptions, each employee stock option granted in 2002 is valued at $2.71 per share and each non-employee director stock option is valued at $3.37 per share. For stock options issued to employees in 2003, the per share values range between $5.80 and $6.25. Each non-employee director stock option granted in 2004 is valued between $2.62 and $2.92. There were no employee option grants during 2004.

Restricted StockNonvested Shares

Restricted stock     Nonvested shares are permitted to be issued as an incentive to attract new employees whenand, effective commensurate with the stock has traded for less than one year,meeting of shareholders held on May 12, 2004, are permitted to be issued to directors and existing employees as iswell. The terms of the case for the Company. During the year ended December 31, 2003, the Company issued 13,045 shares of restricted stock. The termsnonvested share awards are similar to those of the stock option plan whereawards, wherein the shares are issued at or above market values and vest ratably over 5five years. Restricted stock isNonvested shares grants are expensed over itstheir vesting period.

55     The following summarizes all nonvested share transactions from December 31, 2002 through December 31, 2004:

         
  Nonvested  Weighted 
  Shares  Average 
  Outstanding  Price 
December 31,2002    $ 
Granted  13,045   27.57 
       
December 31,2003  13,045   27.57 
Granted  84,350   26.94 
Vested  (2,609)  27.57 
Cancelled  (4,900)  26.08 
       
December 31,2004  89,886  $27.06 
       

65


 

Portfolio Recovery Associates, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

13.Stockholders’ Equity:
15. Earnings per Share:

     Basic earnings per share (“EPS”) are computed by dividing income available to common shareholders by weighted average common shares outstanding. Diluted EPS are computed using the same components as basic EPS with the denominator adjusted for the dilutive effect of stock warrants, stock options and nonvested stock awards. The following table provides a reconciliation between the computation of basic EPS and diluted EPS for the years ended December 31, 2004 and 2003:

                         
  For the year ended December 31, 
  2004  2003 
      Weighted Average          Weighted Average    
  Net Income  Common Shares  EPS  Net Income  Common Shares  EPS 
Basic EPS $27,451,440   15,357,475  $1.79  $20,713,503   14,545,985  $1.42 
Dilutive effect of stock warrants, options and restricted stock awards      495,441           1,165,971     
                       
Diluted EPS $27,451,440   15,852,916  $1.73  $20,713,503   15,711,956  $1.32 
                       

As of December 31, 2004 and 2003, there were 0 and 55,000 antidilutive options outstanding, respectively.

16. Stockholders’ Equity:

Shares of common stock outstanding were as follows:

    
  Common Stock 
December 31, 2001   
Initial public offering  13,470,000 
Exercise of warrants  50,000 
   
 
December 31, 2002  13,520,000 
Exercise of warrants and options  1,774,676 
   
 
December 31, 2003  15,294,676 
Exercise of warrants, options and vesting of nonvested shares  
133,620
Issuance of common stock for ac quisition69,914
December 31, 200415,498,210
 

14.17. Income Taxes:

Prior to November 8, 2002, the Company was organized as a limited liability company, taxed as a partnership, and as such was not subject to federal or state income taxes. Immediately before the IPO, the Company was reorganized as a corporation and became subject to income taxes.

66


Portfolio Recovery Associates, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

The income tax expense recognized for the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002 is composed of the following:

             
For the year ended December 31, 2004 Federal  State  Total 
Current tax expense $638,583     $638,583 
Deferred tax expense  14,056,721   2,692,844   16,749,565 
   
Total income tax expense $14,695,304  $2,692,844  $17,388,148 
   
             
For the year ended December 31, 2003 Federal  State  Total 
Current tax expense $(116,809)  (21,303) $(138,112)
Deferred tax expense  11,279,283   2,058,132   13,337,415 
   
Total income tax expense $11,162,474  $2,036,829  $13,199,303 
   
             
For the year ended December 31, 2002 Federal  State  Total 
Current tax expense $1,005,368   180,823  $1,186,191 
Deferred tax expense  242,633   44,249   286,882 
   
Total income tax expense $1,248,001  $225,072  $1,473,073 
   

The Company also recognized a net deferred tax liability of $13,650,722 as of December 31, 2004, versus a net deferred tax asset of $2,009,426 as of December 31, 2003 and a net deferred tax liability of $286,882 as of December 31, 2002.2003. The components of this net liability and asset and liability are:

56


Portfolio Recovery Associates, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

          
 2003 2002        
     2004 2003 
Deferred tax assets:Deferred tax assets:  
AMT credit $638,583 $ 
Net operating loss — tax 8,623,251 21,002,183 
Employee compensation 386,133 181,668 
Intangible assets and goodwill 101,611  
Other 19,101 6,895 
Net operating loss — tax $21,002,183 $      
Employee compensation 181,668 47,997 
Other 6,895 14,872 
 
 Total deferred tax asset 21,190,746 62,869 
Total deferred tax asset 9,768,679 21,190,746 
 
     
  
Deferred tax liabilities:Deferred tax liabilities:  
Depreciation expense 682,840 516,895 
Prepaid expenses 313,289 268,712 
Cost recovery 22,423,272 18,395,713 
     
Total deferred tax liability 23,419,401 19,181,320 
Depreciation expense 516,895 260,125      
Prepaid expenses 268,712 89,626  
Net deferred tax (liability) and asset $(13,650,722) $2,009,426 
Cost recovery 18,395,713       
 
 Total deferred tax liability 19,181,320 349,751 
 
 
Net deferred tax asset and (liability) $2,009,426 $(286,882)
 

A valuation allowance has not been provided at December 31, 20032004 or 20022003 since management believes it is more likely than not that the deferred tax assets will be realized. In the event that all or part of the net deferred tax assets are determined not to be realizable in the future, an adjustment to the valuation allowance would be charged to earnings in the period such determination is made. Similarly, if the Company subsequently realizes deferred tax assets that were previously determined to be unrealizable, the respective valuation allowance would

67


Portfolio Recovery Associates, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

be reversed, resulting in a positive adjustment to earnings or a decrease in goodwill in the period such determination is made. In addition, the calculation of tax liabilities involves significant judgment in estimating the impact of uncertainties in the application of complex tax laws. Resolution of these uncertainties in a manner inconsistent with management’s expectations could have a material impact on the Company’s results of operations and financial position.

During 2003, the Company recognized a deferred tax asset relating to the net operating loss for tax purposes. This resulted from the adoption of the cost recovery method of income recognition for tax purposes and recognizingcombined with the recognition of a tax deduction of approximately $16.4 million relating to stock option and warrant exercises, net of public offering related expenses. CostThe Company believes cost recovery isto be an acceptable method for companies in the collectionbad debt purchasing industry and results in the reduction of current taxable income as, for tax purposes, collections on finance receivables are applied first to principle to reduce the finance receivables to zero before any income is recognized. The timing difference from the adoption of cost recovery resulted in a deferred tax liability at December 31, 2003. The tax benefit generated by the stock option2004 and warrant exercises reduced the Company’s current tax liability with a corresponding increase in additional paid in capital.2003.

The Company presented pro forma tax information (unaudited) assuming it has been a taxable corporation since inception and assuming tax rates equal to the rates that would have been in effect had it been required to report income tax expense in such years. A reconciliation of the Company’s expected tax expense at statutory tax rates to actual tax expense for the yearyears ended December 31, 2004 and 2003 and the pro forma income tax expense (unaudited) for the yearsyear ended December 31, 2002, and 2001, consists of the following components:

                        
 2003 2002 2001 2004 2003 2002 
           (unaudited) 
Federal tax at statutory rates $11,869,482 $6,488,364 $1,912,953  $15,693,856 $11,869,482 $6,488,364 
State tax expense, net of federal benefit 1,323,939 725,246 226,975  1,750,349 1,323,939 725,246 
Other 5,882  (46,749)  (39,319)  (56,057) 5,882  (46,749)
 
  
Total income tax expense $13,199,303 $7,166,861 $2,100,609  $17,388,148 $13,199,303 $7,166,861 
 
  

15. Contingencies18. Commitments and Commitments:Contingencies:

Employment Agreements:

The Company has employment agreements with all of its executive officers and with several members of its senior management group, the terms of which expire on March 31, 20042005 or December 31, 2005.2005, 2006 or 2007. Such agreements provide for base salary payments as well as bonuses which are based on the attainment of specific management goals. Estimated remainingfuture compensation under these agreements is approximately $3.3 million.$3,676,333. The agreements also contain confidentiality and non-compete provisions.

57


Portfolio Recovery Associates, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Litigation:

The Company is from time to time subject to routine litigation incidental to its business. The Company believes that the results of any pending legal proceedings will not have a material adverse effect on the financial condition, results of operations or liquidity of the Company.

5868


 

Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure.

     None.

Item 9a.9A. Disclosure Controls and Procedures.

     The Company maintainsEvaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures.We maintain disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in the Company’sour Exchange Act reports is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission’sSEC’s rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to the Company’sour management, including itsour Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. In designing and evaluating the disclosure controls and procedures, management recognized that any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving the desired control objectives, and management necessarily was required to apply its judgment in evaluating the cost-benefit relationship of possible controls and procedures.

     Within 90 days prior Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the daterisk that controls may become inadequate because of this report,changes in conditions or that the Company carried outdegree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate. We conducted an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of the Company’s management, including the Company’s Chief Executive Officerour principal executive officer and the Company’s Chief Financial Officer,principal financial officer, of the effectiveness of the Company’sour disclosure controls and procedures pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 13a-14.as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based on this evaluation, the foregoing, the Company’s Chief Executive Officerprincipal executive officer and Chief Financial Officerprincipal financial officer have concluded that, the Company’sas of December 31, 2004, our disclosure controls and procedures were effectiveeffective.

Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting.We are responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting. Internal control over financial reporting is defined in timely alerting the Company’s management to material information relating to the Company required to be included in the Company’s Exchange Act reports.Rules 13a-15(f) or 15d-15(f) as a process designed by, or under the supervision of, the company’s principal executive and principal financial officers and effected by the company’s board of directors, management and other personnel, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Management’s assessment was based on the framework in Internal Control — Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Based on its assessment, management has determined that, as of December 31, 2004, its internal control over financial reporting was effective. Management’s assessment of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2004 has been audited by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, as stated in their report which is included herein.

     Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting.There have beenwas no significant changeschange in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the Company’squarter ended December 31, 2004 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect the internal controls subsequent to the date the Company completed its evaluation.control over financial reporting.

59Item 9B. Other Information.

     None.

69


 

PART III

Item 10. Directors and Executive Officers of the Registrant.

     The following table sets forth certain information as of February 12, 200411, 2005 about the Company’s directors and executive officers.

       
Name Position Age



Steven D. Fredrickson President, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board 
44
45

Kevin P. Stevenson Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and Assistant Secretary 
39
40

Craig A. Grube Executive Vice President — Acquisitions 
43
44

James L. Keown Senior Vice President — Strategic Initiatives 
46

Judith S. Scott Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary 
58
59

William P. Brophey Director* 
66
67

Peter A. Cohen Director* 
57
58

David N. Roberts Director 
41
42

Scott M. TabakinDirector*46
James M. Voss Director* 
61
62

* Member of the Company’s audit committee (the “Audit Committee”), which has been established in accordance with Section 3(a)(58)(A) of the Exchange Act. The Board of Directors of the Company has determined that Mr. Voss is an independent director (as that term is used in Schedule 14A of the Exchange Act) and is the “audit committee financial expert” for the Company who serves on the Audit Committee.


*Member of the Company’s audit committee (the “Audit Committee”), which has been established in accordance with Section 3(a)(58)(A) of the Exchange Act. In the opinion of the Board, Mr. Voss, Mr. Cohen and Mr. Tabakin are independent directors who qualify as “audit committee financial experts,” pursuant to Section 401(h) of Regulations S-K.

     Steven D. Fredrickson, President, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board.Prior to co-founding Portfolio Recovery Associates in 1996, Mr. Fredrickson was Vice President, Director of Household Recovery Services’ (“HRSC”) Portfolio Services Group from late 1993 until February 1996. At HRSC Mr. Fredrickson was ultimately responsible for HRSC’s portfolio sale and purchase programs, finance and accounting, as well as other functional areas. Prior to joining HRSC, he spent five years with Household Commercial Financial Services managing a national commercial real estate workout team and five years with Continental Bank of Chicago as a member of the FDIC workout department, specializing in corporate and real estate workouts. He received a B.S. degree from the University of Denver and a M.B.A. degree from the University of Illinois. He is a past board member of the American Asset Buyers Association.

     Kevin P. Stevenson, Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and Assistant Secretary.Prior to co-founding Portfolio Recovery Associates in 1996, Mr. Stevenson served as Controller and Department Manager of Financial Control and Operations Support at HRSC from June 1994 to March 1996, supervising a department of approximately 30 employees. Prior to joining HRSC, he served as Controller of Household Bank’s Regional Processing Center in Worthington, Ohio where he also managed the collections, technology, research and ATM departments. While at Household Bank, Mr. Stevenson participated in eight bank acquisitions and numerous branch acquisitions or divestitures. He is a certified public accountant and received his B.S.B.A. with a major in accounting from the Ohio State University.

     Craig A. Grube, Executive Vice President — Acquisitions.Prior to joining Portfolio Recovery Associates in March 1998, Mr. Grube was a senior officer and director of Anchor Fence, Inc., a manufacturing and distribution business from 1989 to March 1997, when the company was sold. Between the time of the sale and March 1998, Mr. Grube continued to work for Anchor Fence. Prior to joining Anchor Fence, he managed distressed corporate debt for the FDIC at Continental Illinois National Bank for five years. He received his B.A. degree from Boston College and his M.B.A. degree from the University of Illinois.

James L. Keown, Senior Vice President — Strategic Initiatives.Prior to co-founding Portfolio Recovery Associates in 1996, Mr. Keown had been with HRSC for 14 years and had sales and finance experience prior to joining HRSC. Mr. Keown’s final position at HRSC was Department Manager, Technology Service where he was directly responsible for a 275 node local area network, all phone and data communications, as well as performance engineering and applications programming. Mr. Keown will retire from the Company effective March 31, 2004.

60


     Judith S. Scott, Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary.Prior to joining Portfolio Recovery Associates in March 1998, Ms. Scott held senior positions, from 1991 to March 1998, with Old Dominion University as Director of its Virginia Peninsula campus, from 1985 to 1991, as General Counsel of a computer manufacturing firm; as Senior Counsel in the Office of the Governor of Virginia from 1982 to 1985; as Senior Counsel for the Virginia Housing Development Authority from 1976 to 1982, and as Assistant Attorney General for the Commonwealth of Virginia from 1975 to 1976. Ms. Scott received her B.S. in business administration from

70


Virginia State University, a post baccalaureate degree in economics from Swarthmore College, and a J.D. from the Catholic University School of Law.

     William P. Brophey, Director.Mr. Brophey was elected as a director of Portfolio Recovery Associates in 2002. Currently retired, Mr. Brophey has more than 35 years of experience as president and chief executive officer of Brad Ragan, Inc., a (formerly) publicly traded automotive product and service retailer and as a senior executive at The Goodyear Tire and Rubber Company. Throughout his career, he held numerous field and corporate positions at Goodyear in the areas of wholesale, retail, credit, and sales and marketing, including general marketing manager, commercial tire products. He served as president and chief executive officer and a member of the board of directors of Brad Ragan, Inc. (a 75% owned public subsidiary of Goodyear) from 1988 to 1996, and vice chairman of the board of directors from 1994 to 1996, when he was named vice president, original equipment tire sales world wide at Goodyear. From 1998 until his retirement in 2000, he was again elected president and chief executive officer and vice chairman of the board of directors of Brad Ragan, Inc. Mr. Brophey has a business degree from Ohio Valley College and attended advanced management programs at Kent State University, Northwestern University, Morehouse College and Columbia University.

     Peter A. Cohen, Director.Mr. Cohen was elected as a director of Portfolio Recovery Associates in 2002. Mr. Cohen began his career on Wall Street at Reynolds & Co. in 1969. In 1970, he joined the firm which would later become Shearson Lehman Brothers. In 1981, when Shearson merged with American Express, he was appointed president and chief operating officer. From 1983 to 1990, he served as chairman and chief executive officer of Shearson. From 1991 to 1994, Mr. Cohen served as an advisor and vice chairman of the board of Republic New York Corporation. In 1994, he started what is today Ramius Capital Group, an investment management business, which currently has $3 billion of assets under management. Mr. Cohen has served on numerous boards of directors, including the New York Stock Exchange, the American Express Company, Olivetti SpA, and Telecom SpA. Currently, he sits on the boards of Presidential Life Corporation, The Mount-Sinai-NYU Medical Center & Health System, Kroll Inc., and Titan Corporation. Mr. Cohen has an MBA from Columbia University and a Bachelor’s Degree from Ohio State University.

     David N. Roberts, Director.Mr. Roberts has been a director of Portfolio Recovery Associates since its formation in 1996. Mr. Roberts joined Angelo, Gordon & Company, L.P. in 1993. He manages the firm’s private equity and special situations area and was the founder of the firm’s opportunistic real estate area. Mr. Roberts has invested in a wide variety of real estate, corporate and special situations transactions. Prior to joining Angelo, Gordon Mr. Roberts was a principal at Gordon Investment Corporation, a Canadian merchant bank from 1989 to 1993, where he participated in a wide variety of principal transactions including investments in the real estate, mortgage banking and food industries. Prior to joining Gordon Investment Corporation, he worked in the Corporate Finance Department of L.F. Rothschild where he specialized in mergers and acquisitions. He has a B.S. degree in economics from the Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania.

Scott M. Tabakin, Director.Mr. Tabakin was appointed a director of Portfolio Recovery Associates in 2004. A seasoned financial executive, Mr. Tabakin brings significant public-company experience to Portfolio Recovery Associates. Mr. Tabakin served as Executive Vice President and CFO of AMERIGROUP Corporation, a managed health-care company, through the fall of 2003 and prior to that was Executive Vice President and CFO of Beverly Enterprises, Inc., one of the nation’s largest providers of long-term health care. Earlier in his career, Mr. Tabakin was an executive with the accounting firm of Ernst & Young. He is a certified public accountant and received a B.S. degree from the University of Illinois.

     James M. Voss, Director.Mr. Voss was elected as a director of Portfolio Recovery Associates in 2002. Mr. Voss has more than 35 years of experience as a senior finance executive. He currently heads Voss Consulting, Inc., serving as a consultant to community banks regarding policy, organization, credit risk management and strategic planning. From 1992 through 1998, he was with First Midwest Bank as executive vice president and chief credit officer. He served in a variety of senior executive roles during a 24 year career (1965-1989) with Continental Bank of Chicago, and was chief financial officer at Allied Products Corporation (1990-1991), a publicly traded (NYSE) diversified manufacturer. Currently, he serves on the board of Elgin State Bank. Mr. Voss has both an MBA and Bachelor’s Degree from Northwestern University.

6171


 

Corporate Code of Ethics

The Company has adopted a Code of Ethics which is applicable to all directors, officers, and employees and which complies with the definition of a “code of ethics” set out in Section 406(c) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and the requirement of a “Code of Conduct” prescribed by Section 4350(n) of the Marketplace Rules of the NASDAQ Stock Market, Inc. The Code of Ethics is available to the public, and will be provided by the Company at no charge to any requesting party. Interested parties may obtain a copy of the Code of Ethics by submitting a written request to Investor Relations, Portfolio Recovery Associates, Inc., 120 Corporate Boulevard, Suite 100, Norfolk, Virginia, 23502, or by email at investorrelations@portfoliorecovery.com.info@portfoliorecovery.com. The Code of Ethics willis also be posted on the CompanyCompany’s website at www.portfoliorecovery.com and will be available online on or about March 10, 2004.www.portfoliorecovery.com.

6272


 

Item 11. Executive Compensation.

     The information required by Item 11 is incorporated herein by reference to the section labeled “Executive Compensation” in the Company’s definitive Proxy Statement in connection with the Company’s 20042005 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.

Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management.

     The information required by Item 12 is incorporated herein by reference to the section labeled “Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management” in the Company’s definitive Proxy Statement in connection with the Company’s 20042005 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.

Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions.

     The information required by Item 13 is incorporated herein by reference to the section labeled “Certain Relationships and Related Transactions” in the Company’s definitive Proxy Statement in connection with the Company’s 20042005 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.

Item 14. Principal Accountant Fees and Services.

     The aggregate fees billed or expected to be billed by PricewaterhouseCoopers, LLP for the years ended December 31, 20032004 and 20022003 are presented in the table below:

        
 2004 2003 
Audit Fees 
Annual audit $190,000 $130,575 
Sarbanes-Oxley 404 audit 180,000  
Registration statement(1)
 64,225 118,739 
              
 2003 2002 434,225 249,314 
     
Audit Fees 
Audit Related Fees 
WestLB attest service   4,700(2)
Consultation on various accounting matters  56,344(3)  
 
Tax Fees 
Advice   125,507(4)
Annual audit $130,575 $124,151      
Registration statements 118,739 340,321   125,507 
  
 
  
 249,314 464,472      
Total Accountant Fees $490,569 $379,521 
      
Audit Related Fees 
WestLB attest service 4,700 2,000 
 
Tax Fees 
Compliance 10,000 29,625 
Advice 125,507 21,425 
  
 
 
 135,507 51,050 
 
All Other Fees   
  
 
 
Total Accountant Fees $389,521 $517,522 
  
 
 


(1)The fees related to the registration statement filed on Form S-3 in November 2004 were paid for in full by one of the selling stockholders.
(2)This fee relates to an annual review conducted by our prior lender.
(3)These include fees associated with our auditor’s review of the treatment of certain accounting matters and purchase accounting relating to the IGS acquisition.
(4)Tax advice fees were incurred to assist us in implementing bona fide tax strategies as a result of the November 2002 IPO.

73


The Audit Committee’s charter provides that they will:

1. Approve the fees and other significant compensation to be paid to auditors.

2. Review the non-audit services to determine whether they are permissible under current law.

63


3. Pre-approve the provision of any permissible non-audit services by the independent auditors and the related fees of the independent auditors therefor.

4.
•  Approve the fees and other significant compensation to be paid to auditors.
•  Review the non-audit services to determine whether they are permissible under current law.
•  Pre-approve the provision of any permissible non-audit services by the independent auditors and the related fees of the independent auditors therefore.
•  Consider whether the provision of these other services is compatible with maintaining the auditors’ independence.

     All the fees paid to PricewaterhouseCoopers were pre-approved by the Audit Committee.

6474


 

PART IV

Item 15. Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules and Reports on Form 8-K.

(a)Financial Statements.
(a)Financial Statements.

The following financial statements of the Company are included in Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K:

     
  Page
 
Report of Independent AuditorsRegistered Public Accounting Firm  3945-46 
Consolidated Statements of Financial PositionBalance Sheets at December 31, 2004 and 200347
Consolidated Income Statements for the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002  40
Consolidated Statements of Operations for the years ended December 31, 2003, 2002 and 20014148 
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity forFor the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003 2002 and 20012002  4249 
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows forFor the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003 2002 and 20012002  4350 
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements  44-5851-68 

(b)Reports on(b)Exhibits.Form 8-K.

Filed October 27, 2003, issuance of a quarterly earnings press release for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2003.

(c)Exhibits.

 2.1  
10.1LoanEquity Exchange Agreement dated July 20, 2000, by and between PRA Holding I, LLC, Bank of America, N.A.Portfolio Recovery Associates, L.L.C. and Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC.Inc. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.22.1 of the Registration Statement on Form S-1.)
10.2
 Business Loan2.2  Asset Purchase Agreement dated September 24, 2001,as of October 1, 2004, by and between PRA Holding I, LLC, Bank of America, N.A. andamong Portfolio Recovery Associates, L.L.C.Inc, PRA Location Services, LLC, IGS Nevada, Inc., and James Snead (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.52.1 of the Form 8-K dated October 7, 2004.)
3.1  Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Portfolio Recovery Associates, Inc. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 of the Registration Statement on Form S-1.)
10.3
 Amendment to Business Loan Agreement, dated February 20, 2002, by3.2  Amended and between PRA Holding I, LLC, BankRestated By-Laws of America, N.A. and Portfolio Recovery Associates, L.L.C.Inc. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.63.2 of the Registration Statement on Form S-1.)
10.4
4.1  Form of Common Stock Certificate (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 of the Registration Statement on Form S-1.)
4.2  Form of Warrant (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 of the Registration Statement on Form S-1.)
10.1  Employment Agreement, dated December 8, 2002, by and between Steven D. Fredrickson and Portfolio Recovery Associates, Inc. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.8 of the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002.)
10.5
10.2  Employment Agreement, dated December 8, 2002, by and between Kevin P. Stevenson and Portfolio Recovery Associates, Inc. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.9 of the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002.)
10.6
10.3  Employment Agreement, dated December 8, 2002, by and between Craig A. Grube and Portfolio Recovery Associates, Inc. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.10 of the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002.)
10.7
10.4  Employment Agreement, dated December 27, 2002, by and between James L. Keown and Portfolio Recovery Associates, Inc. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.12 of the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002.)
10.8
10.5  Employment Agreement, dated December 8, 2002, by and between Judith S. Scott and Portfolio Recovery Associates, Inc. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.13 of the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002.)
10.9
10.6  Portfolio Recovery Associates, Inc. Amended and Restated 2002 Stock Option Plan and 2004 Restricted Stock Plan. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1210.9 of the Registration Statement on Form S-1.)
10.10Riverside Commerce Center Office Lease, dated February 12, 1999, by and between Riverside Investors, L.C. and Portfolio Recovery Associates, L.L.C. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.13 of the Registration Statement on Form S-1.)

65


10.11First Amendment to Riverside Commerce Center Office Lease, dated April 27, 1999, by and between Riverside Investors, L.C. and Portfolio Recovery Associates, L.L.C. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.14 of the Registration Statement on Form S-1.)
10.12Second Amendment to Riverside Commerce Center Office Lease, dated September 29, 2000, by and between Riverside Investors, L.C. and Portfolio Recovery Associates, L.L.C. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.15 of the Registration Statement on Form S-1.)
10.13Office Lease, dated November 13, 2002, by and between NetCenter Partners, LLC and Portfolio Recovery Associates, L.L.C. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.16 of the Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2002.)
10.14Riverside Commerce Center II Office Lease, dated June 27, 2003, by and between Riverside Investors, L.C. and Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.20 of the Formform 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2003).2004.)

75


10.15 Third Amendment to Riverside Commerce Center Office Lease, dated June 27, 2003, by and between Riverside Investors, L.C. and Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.21 of the Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2003).
10.16First Lease Amendment to Riverside Commerce Office Lease, dated June 27, 2003, by and between Riverside Crossing L.C. and Portfolio Recovery Associates, Inc. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.23 of the Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2003).
10.17Fourth Lease Amendment to Riverside Commerce Center Office Lease, dated February 12, 1999, by and between Riverside Crossing, L.C. and Portfolio Recovery Associates, Inc. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.24 of the Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2003).
10.1810.7  Loan and Security Agreement, dated November 28, 2003, by and between Portfolio Recovery Associates, Inc. and RBC Centura Bank. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.18 of the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2003).
10.19
 10.8  Amended and Restated Commercial Promissory Note dated November 28, 2003,22, 2004 (Incorporated by and between Portfolio Recovery Associates, Inc. and RBC Centura Bank.reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Form 8-K filed November 24, 2004)
10.20
10.9  Business Loan Agreement, dated January 8, 2004, by and between Portfolio Recovery Associates, Inc. and RBC Centura Bank. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.20 of the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2003).
10.21
10.10  Promissory Note, dated January 8, 2004, by and between Portfolio Recovery Associates, Inc. and RBC Centura Bank. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.21 of the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2003).
21.1
21.1  Subsidiaries of Portfolio Recovery Associates, Inc. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 of the Registration Statement on Form S-1).
23.1
23.1  Consent of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
24.1
24.1  Powers of Attorney (included on signature page).
31.1
31.1  Section 302 Certifications of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
32.1
32.1  Section 906 Certifications of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer

6676


 

SIGNATURES

     Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

     
 Portfolio Recovery Associates, Inc.
(Registrant)
     
Dated: February 18, 2004March 14, 2005 By:/s/ /s/ Steven D. Fredrickson
    
 Steven D. Fredrickson
President, Chief Executive Officer
and Chairman of the Board
(Principal Executive Officer)
     
Dated: February 18, 2004March 14, 2005 By:/s/ /s/ Kevin P. Stevenson
    
 Kevin P. Stevenson
Chief Financial Officer, Executive Vice President,
Treasurer and Assistant Secretary
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)

     KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS,that each of the undersigned whose signature appears below constitutes and appoints Steven D. Fredrickson and Kevin P. Stevenson, his true and lawful attorneys-in-fact, with full power of substitution and resubstitution for him and on his behalf, and in his name, place and stead, in any and all capacities to execute and sign any and all amendments or post-effective amendments to this Annual Report on Form 10-K, and to file the same, with all exhibits thereto, and other documents in connection therewith, with the Securities and Exchange Commission, hereby ratifying and confirming all that said attorneys-in-fact or any of them or their or his substitute or substitutes, may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof and the registrant hereby confers like authority on its behalf.

     Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

     
Dated: February 18, 2004March 14, 2005 By:/s/ /s/ Steven D. Fredrickson
    
 Steven D. Fredrickson
President and Chief Executive Officer
     
Dated: February 18, 2004March 14, 2005 By:/s/ /s/ Kevin P. Stevenson
    
 Kevin P. Stevenson
Chief Financial Officer, Executive Vice President,
Treasurer and Assistant Secretary
     
Dated: February 18, 2004March 14, 2005 By:/s/ /s/ William P. Brophey
    
 William P. Brophey
Director
     
Dated: February 18, 2004March 14, 2005 By:/s/ /s/ Peter A. Cohen
    
 Peter A. Cohen
Director
     
Dated: February 18, 2004March 14, 2005 By:/s/ /s/ David N. Roberts
    
 David Roberts
Director
     
Dated: February 18, 2004March 14, 2005 By: /s/ Scott M. Tabakin /s/ James
Scott M. VossTabakin
Director
    
Dated: March 14, 2005By: /s/ James M. Voss
 James M. Voss
Director

6777