UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FormFORM 10-K
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
(Mark one)
þANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 20082009
oTRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period fromto
Commission File No.COMMISSION FILE NUMBER 001-14793
First BanCorp.FIRST BANCORP.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)EXACT NAME OF REGISTRANT AS SPECIFIED IN ITS CHARTER)
   
Puerto Rico 66-0561882
(State or other jurisdiction of (I.R.S. Employer
incorporation or organization) Identification No.)
   
1519 Ponce de León Avenue, Stop 23 00908
Santurce, Puerto Rico (Zip Code)
(Address of principal executive office)  
Registrant’s telephone number, including area code:
(787) 729-8200
Securities registered underpursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
   
Title of Each Class Name of Each Exchange on Which Registered
Common Stock ($1.00 par value) New York Stock Exchange
7.125% Noncumulative Perpetual Monthly Income New York Stock Exchange
Preferred Stock, Series A (Liquidation Preference $25 per share)  
8.35% Noncumulative Perpetual Monthly Income New York Stock Exchange
Preferred Stock, Series B (Liquidation Preference $25 per share)  
7.40% Noncumulative Perpetual Monthly Income New York Stock Exchange
Preferred Stock, Series C (Liquidation Preference $25 per share)  
7.25% Noncumulative Perpetual Monthly Income New York Stock Exchange
Preferred Stock, Series D (Liquidation Preference $25 per share)  
7.00% Noncumulative Perpetual Monthly Income New York Stock Exchange
Preferred Stock, Series E (Liquidation Preference $25 per share)  
Securities registered underpursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
NONE
     Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well- known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yeso Noþ
     Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15 (d) of the Act. Yeso Noþ
     Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yesþ Noo
     Indicate by checkmark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Website, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yeso Noo
     Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (§229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definite proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
       
Large accelerated filerþo Accelerated fileroþ Non-accelerated filero
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
 Smaller reporting companyo
     Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yeso Noþ
     The aggregate market value of the voting common equity held by non affiliates of the registrant as of June 30, 20082009 (the last day of the registrant’s most recently completed second quarter) was $527,602,809$328,696,232 based on the closing price of $6.34$3.95 per share of common stock on the New York Stock Exchange on June 30, 2008.2009. The registrant had no nonvoting common equity outstanding as of June 30, 2008.2009. For the purposes of the foregoing calculation only, registrant has treated as common stock held by affiliates only common stock of the registrant held by its directors and executive officers and voting stock held by the registrant’s employee benefit plans. The registrant’s response to this item is not intended to be an admission that any person is an affiliate of the registrant for any purposes other than this response.
     Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the registrant’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date: 92,546,74992,542,722 shares as of January 31, 2009.2010.
 
 

 


DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
PART III
Item 10Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance.Information in response to this Item is incorporated into this Annual Report on Form 10-K by reference from the sections entitled “Information with Respect to Nominees for Director of First BanCorp and Executive Officers of the Corporation,” “Corporate Governance and Related Matters” and “Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance” in First BanCorp’s definitive Proxy Statement for use in connection with its 2009 Annual Meeting of stockholders (the “Proxy Statement”) to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission within 120 days of the close of First BanCorp’s 2008 fiscal year.
Item 11Executive Compensation.Information in response to this Item is incorporated into this Annual Report on Form 10-K by reference from the sections entitled “Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation,” “Compensation of Directors,” “Compensation Discussion and Analysis,” “Compensation Committee Report” and “Tabular Executive Compensation Disclosure” in First BanCorp’s Proxy Statement.
Item 12Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters.Information in response to this Item is incorporated into this Annual Report on Form 10-K by reference from the section entitled “Beneficial Ownership of Securities” in First BanCorp’s Proxy Statement.
Item 13Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence.Information in response to this Item is incorporated into this Annual Report on Form 10-K by reference from the sections entitled “Certain Relationships and Related Person Transactions” and “Corporate Governance and Related Matters” in First BanCorp’s Proxy Statement.
Item 14Principal Accounting Fees and Services.Information in response to this Item is incorporated into this Annual Report on Form 10-K by reference from the section entitled “Audit Fees” in First BanCorp’s Proxy Statement.
Portions of the Registrant’s Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held in April 2010, which will be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission within 120 days after the end of the registrant’s fiscal year ended December 31, 2009, are incorporated by reference into Part III, Items 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14, of this Form-10-K.

2


 

FIRST BANCORP
20082009 ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K
TABLE OF CONTENTS
     
PART I
  6 
  2830 
  3746 
  3746 
  3746 
  3746 
  
PART II
  3847 
  4251 
  4352 
   121138 
   121138 
   121138 
   122138 
   122138 
  
PART III
   123139 
   123139 
   123139 
   123139 
   123139 
  
PART IV
   123139
 
  127143 
 EX-3.1EX-10.6
 EX-3.2EX-10.9
 EX-4.6EX-10.13
 EX-14.1EX-10.17
EX-12.1
 EX-21.1
 EX-31.1
 EX-31.2
 EX-32.1
 EX-32.2
EX-99.1
EX-99.2

3


Forward Looking Statements
     This Form 10-K contains “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. When used in this Form 10-K or future filings by First BanCorp (the “Corporation”) with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”), in the Corporation’s press releases or in other public or stockholder communications, or in oral statements made with the approval of an authorized executive officer, the word or phrases “would be,” “will allow,” “intends to,” “will likely result,” “are expected to,” “should,” “anticipate” and similar expressions are meant to identify “forward-looking statements.”
     First BanCorp wishes to caution readers not to place undue reliance on any such “forward-looking statements,” which speak only as of the date made, and represent First BanCorp’s expectations of future conditions or results and are not guarantees of future performance. First BanCorp advises readers that various factors could cause actual results to differ materially from those contained in any “forward-looking statement.” Such factors include, but are not limited to, the following:
  risks arising fromuncertainty about whether the Corporation’s actions to improve its capital structure will have their intended effect;
the strength or weakness of the real estate market and of the consumer and commercial credit sector and other riskstheir impact on the credit quality of the Corporation’s lendingloans and investment activities,other assets, including the Corporation’s condo-conversion loans from its Miami Corporate Banking operations and the construction and commercial real estate loan portfolio in Puerto Rico,portfolios, which have contributed and may affect,continue to contribute to, among other things, the levelincrease in the levels of non-performing assets, charge-offs and loan loss provision;the provision expense;
adverse changes in general economic conditions in the United States and in Puerto Rico, including the interest rate scenario, market liquidity, housing absorption rates, real estate prices and disruptions in the U.S. capital markets, which may reduce interest margins, impact funding sources and affect demand for all of the Corporation’s products and services and the value of the Corporation’s assets, including the value of derivative instruments used for protection from interest rate fluctuations;
the Corporation’s reliance on brokered certificates of deposit and its ability to continue to rely on the issuance of brokered certificates of deposit to fund operations and provide liquidity;
 
  an adverse change in the Corporation’s ability to attract new clients and retain existing ones;
 
  decreaseda decrease in demand for ourthe Corporation’s products and services and lower revenuerevenues and earnings because of a recession in the United States, a continued recession in Puerto Rico and the current fiscal problems and budget deficit of the Puerto Rico government;
 
  changes in general economic conditions in the United States and Puerto Rico, including the interest rate environment, market liquidity, market rates and prices, and disruptions in the U.S. capital markets which may reduce interest margins, impact funding sources and affect demand for the Corporation’s products and services and the valuea need to recognize additional impairments of the Corporation’s assets, including the value of the interest rate swaps that economically hedge the interest rate risk mainlyfinancial instruments or goodwill relating to brokered certificates of deposit and medium-term notes as well as other derivative instruments used for protection from interest rate fluctuations;acquisitions;
 
  uncertainty about specific measures that could be adopted by theregulatory and legislative changes for financial services companies in Puerto Rico, government in response to its fiscal situationthe United States and the impact of those measures in several sectors of Puerto Rico’s economy;U.S. and British Virgin Islands, which could affect the Corporation’s financial performance and could cause the Corporation’s actual results for future periods to differ materially from prior results and anticipated or projected results;
 
  uncertainty about the effectiveness and impact of the various actions undertaken to stimulate the U.S. government’s rescue plan, includingeconomy and stabilize the bailout of U.S. government-sponsored housing agencies, on the financial markets, in general and the impact such actions may have on the Corporation’s business, financial condition and results of operations;
 
  changes in the fiscal and monetary policies and regulations of the federal government, including those determined by the Federal Reserve System (FED)(the “Federal Reserve”), the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC)(“FDIC”), government-sponsored housing agencies and local regulators in Puerto Rico and the U.S. and British Virgin Islands;
 
  the risk that the FDIC may further increase the deposit insurance premium and/or require special assessments to replenish its insurance fund, causing an additional increase in our non-interest expense;
risks associated withof an additional allowance as a result of an analysis of the soundnessability to generate sufficient income to

4


realize the benefit of other financial institutions;the deferred tax asset;
 
  risks of not being able to recover allthe assets pledged to Lehman Brothers Special Financing, Inc.;
 
  changes in the Corporation’s expenses associated with acquisitions and dispositions;
 
  developments in technology;
 
  the impact of theDoral Financial Corporation’s financial condition of Doral Financial Corporation (“Doral”) and R&G Financial Corporation (“R&G Financial”) on the repayment of theirits outstanding secured loans to the Corporation;

4


the Corporation’s ability to issue brokered certificates of deposit and fund operations;
 
  risks associated with further downgrades in the credit ratings of the Corporation’s securities; and
 
  general competitive factors and industry consolidation.consolidation; and
the possible future dilution to holders of our Common Stock resulting from additional issuances of Common Stock or securities convertible into Common Stock.
     The Corporation does not undertake, and specifically disclaims any obligation, to update any of the “forward- looking statements” to reflect occurrences or unanticipated events or circumstances after the date of such statements except as required by the federal securities laws.
     Investors should carefully consider these factors and the risk factors outlined under Item 1A, Risk Factors, in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

5


PART I
     FirstBanCorp, incorporated under the laws of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, is sometimes referred to in this Annual Report on Form 10-K as “the Corporation”, “we”, “our”, “the Registrant”.
Item 1.Business
GENERAL
     First BanCorp (the “Corporation”) is a publicly-owned financial holding company that is subject to regulation, supervision and examination by the Federal Reserve Board (the “FED”). The Corporation was incorporated under the laws of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico to serve as the bank holding company for FirstBank Puerto Rico (“FirstBank” or the “Bank”). The Corporation is a full service provider of financial services and products with operations in Puerto Rico, the United States and the US and British Virgin Islands. As of December 31, 2008,2009, the Corporation had total assets of $19.5$19.6 billion, total deposits of $13.1$12.7 billion and total stockholders’ equity of $1.5$1.6 billion.
     The Corporation provides a wide range of financial services for retail, commercial and institutional clients. As of December 31, 2008,2009, the Corporation controlled fourthree wholly-owned subsidiaries: FirstBank, FirstBank Insurance Agency, Inc. (“FirstBank Insurance Agency”), and Grupo Empresas de Servicios Financieros (d/b/a “PR Finance Group”) and Ponce General Corporation (“Ponce General”). FirstBank is a Puerto Rico-chartered commercial bank, FirstBank Insurance Agency is a Puerto Rico-chartered insurance agency and PR Finance Group is a domestic corporation and Ponce General is the holding company of a federally chartered stock savings and loan association, FirstBank Florida.corporation.
     FirstBank is subject to the supervision, examination and regulation of both the Office of the Commissioner of Financial Institutions of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico (“OCIF”) and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (the “FDIC”). Deposits are insured through the FDIC Deposit Insurance Fund. In addition, within FirstBank, the Bank’s United States Virgin Islands operations are subject to regulation and examination by the United States Virgin Islands Banking Board, and the British Virgin Islands operations are subject to regulation by the British Virgin Islands Financial Services Commission. FirstBank Insurance Agency is subject to the supervision, examination and regulation of the Office of the Insurance Commissioner of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico and operates nine offices in Puerto Rico. PR Finance Group is subject to the supervision, examination and regulation of the OCIF. FirstBank Florida is subject to the supervision, examination and regulation of the Office of Thrift Supervision (the “OTS”).
     As of December 31, 2008,     FirstBank conducted its business through its main office located in San Juan, Puerto Rico, forty-eight full service banking branches in Puerto Rico, sixteen branches in the United States Virgin Islands (USVI) and British Virgin Islands (BVI) and a loan production officeten branches in Miami,the state of Florida (USA). FirstBank had foursix wholly-owned subsidiaries with operations in Puerto Rico: First Leasing and Rental Corporation, a vehicle leasing and daily rental company with ninetwo offices in Puerto Rico; First Federal Finance Corp. (d/b/a Money Express La Financiera), a finance company specializedspecializing in the origination of small loans with thirty-seventwenty-seven offices in Puerto Rico; First Mortgage, Inc. (“First Mortgage”), a residential mortgage loan origination company with thirty-sixthirty-eight offices in FirstBank branches and at stand-alonestand alone sites; First Management of Puerto Rico, a domestic corporation; FirstBank Puerto Rico Securities Corp, a broker-dealer subsidiary created in March 2009 and engaged in municipal bond underwriting and financial advisory services on structured financings principally provided to government entities in the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico; and FirstBank Overseas Corporation, an international banking entity organized under the International Banking Entity Act of Puerto Rico. FirstBank had three subsidiaries with operations outside of Puerto Rico: First Insurance Agency VI, Inc., an insurance agency with fourthree offices that sells insurance products in the USVI; and First Express, a finance company specializing in the origination of small loans with fourthree offices in the USVI; and First Trade, Inc., which is inactive.USVI.
     TheEffective July 1, 2009, the Corporation also operates inconsolidated the United States mainland through its federally charteredoperations of FirstBank Florida, formerly a stock savings and loan association indirectly owned by the Corporation, with and into FirstBank FloridaPuerto Rico and dissolved Ponce General Corporation, former holding company of FirstBank Florida. On October 30, 2009, the Corporation divested its motor vehicle rental operations held through its loan production office located in Miami, Florida. FirstBank Florida provides a wide rangeFirst Leasing and Rental Corporation through the sale of banking services to individual and corporate customers through its nine branches in the U.S. mainland.such business.

6


BUSINESS SEGMENTS
     The Corporation has foursix reportable segments: Commercial and Corporate Banking; Mortgage Banking; Consumer (Retail) Banking; and Treasury and Investments.Investments; United States Operations; and Virgin Islands Operations. These segments are described below:
   Commercial and Corporate Banking
     The Commercial and Corporate Banking segment consists of the Corporation’s lending and other services for large customers represented by the private and the public sector and specialized industries such as well as specializedhealthcare, tourism, financial institutions, food and beverage, shopping centers and middle-market clients. The Commercial and Corporate Banking segment offers commercial loans, including commercial real estate and construction loans, and other products such as cash management and business management services. A substantial portion of the commercial loanthis portfolio is secured either by the underlying value of the real estate collateral, and collateral and the personal guarantees of the borrowers are taken in abundance of caution. Although commercial loans involve greater credit risk than a typical residential mortgage loan because they are larger in size and more risk is concentrated in a single borrower, the Corporation has and maintains an effectivea credit risk management infrastructure designed to mitigate potential losses associated with commercial lending, including strong underwriting and loan review functions, sales of loan participations and continuous monitoring of concentrations within portfolios.
   Mortgage Banking
     The Mortgage Banking segment conducts its operations mainly through FirstBank and its mortgage origination subsidiary, FirstMortgage. These operations consist of the origination, sale and servicing of a variety of residential mortgage loanloans products. Originations are sourced through different channels such as stand-alone offices,branches, mortgage centers within FirstBank branches and mortgagebankers and real estate brokers, and in association with new project developers. FirstMortgage focuses on originating residential real estate loans, some of which conform to Federal Housing Administration (“FHA”), Veterans Administration (“VA”) and Rural Development (“RD”) standards. Loans originated that meet FHA standards qualify for the federal agency’s insurance program whereas loans that meet VA and RD standards are guaranteed by their respective federal agencies. In December 2008, the Corporation obtained from the Government National Mortgage Association (“GNMA”) the necessary Commitment Authority to issue GNMA mortgage-backed securities. Under this program, during 2009, the Corporation will begin securitizing and sellingcompleted the securitization of approximately $305.4 million of FHA/VA mortgage loan productionloans into the secondary markets.GNMA MBS.
     Mortgage loans that do not qualify under the aforementionedthese programs are commonly referred to as conventional loans. Conventional real estate loans could be conforming and non-conforming. Conforming loans are residential real estate loans that meet the standards for sale under the Fannie Mae (“FNMA”) and Freddie Mac (“FHLMC”) programs whereas loans that do not meet thesethe standards are referred to as non-conforming residential real estate loans. The Corporation’s strategy is to penetrate markets by seeking to provideproviding customers with a variety of high quality mortgage products to serve their financial needs faster and more easily than the competitionsimpler and at competitive prices. The Mortgage Banking segment also acquires and sells mortgages in the secondary markets. Residential real estate conforming loans are sold to investors like FNMA and FHLMC. More than 90% of the Corporation’s residential mortgage loan portfolio consists of fixed-rate, fully amortizing, full documentation loans that have a lower risk than the typical sub-prime loans that have adversely affected the U.S. real estate market. The Corporation is not active in negative amortization loans or option adjustable rate mortgage loans (ARMs) including ARMs with teaser rates.
   Consumer (Retail) Banking
     The Consumer (Retail) Banking segment consists of the Corporation’s consumer lending and deposit-taking activities conducted mainly through its branch network and loan centers.centers in Puerto Rico. Loans to consumers include auto, boats,boat, lines of credit, and personal loans. Deposit products include interest-bearinginterest bearing and non-interest bearing checking and savings accounts, Individual Retirement Accounts (IRA) and retail certificates of deposit. Retail deposits gathered through each branch of FirstBank’s retail network serve as one of the funding sources for the lending and investment activities.

7


     Consumer lending has been mainly driven by auto loan originations. The Corporation follows a strategy of providingseeking to provide outstanding service to selected auto dealers whothat provide the channel for the bulk of the Corporation’s auto loan originations. This strategy is directly linked to the Corporation’sour commercial lending activities as the Corporation maintains strong and stable auto floor plan relationships, which are the foundation of a successful auto loan generation operation. The Corporation’s commercial relations with floor plan dealers isare strong and directly benefitsbenefit the Corporation’s consumer lending operation and are managed as part of the consumer banking activities.
     Personal loans and, to a lesser extent, marine financing and a small revolving credit portfolio also contribute to interest income generated on consumer lending. Credit card accounts are issued under the Bank’s name through an alliance with FIA Card Services (Bank of America), which bears the credit risk. Management plans to continue to be active in the consumer loans market, applying the Corporation’s strict underwriting standards. Through an alliance reached with FIA Card Services (Bank of America), after the acquisition by FIA of the Citibank Puerto Rico credit card portfolio, credit cards are issued under the FirstBank name. FIA bears the credit risk for these accounts.
     Treasury and Investments
     The Treasury and Investments segment is responsible for the Corporation’s treasury and investment portfoliomanagement functions. In the treasury function, which includes funding and treasury functions designed to manage and enhance liquidity. Thisliquidity management, this segment sells funds to the Commercial and Corporate Banking, Mortgage Banking, and Consumer (Retail) Banking segments to finance their lending activities and purchases funds gathered by those segments. Funds not gathered by the different business units are obtained by the Treasury Division through wholesale channels, such as brokered deposits, Advances from the FHLB and repurchase agreements with investment securities, among others.
     Since the Corporation is a net borrower of funds, the securities portfolio does not result from the investment of excess funds. The securities portfolio is a leverage strategy for the purposes of liquidity management, interest rate management and earnings enhancement.
     The interest rates charged or credited by Treasury and Investments are based on market rates.
   United States Operations
     The United States operations segment consists of all banking activities conducted by FirstBank in the United States mainland. The Corporation provides a wide range of banking services to individual and corporate customers in the state of Florida through its ten branches and two specialized lending centers. In the United States, the Corporation originally had an agency lending office in Miami, Florida. Then, it acquired Coral Gables-based Ponce General (the parent company of Unibank, a savings and loans bank in 2005) and changed the savings and loan’s name to FirstBank Florida. Those two entities were operated separately. In 2009, the Corporation filed an application with the Office of Thrift Supervision to surrender the Miami-based FirstBank Florida charter and merge its assets into FirstBank Puerto Rico, the main subsidiary of First BanCorp. The Corporation placed the entire Florida operation under the control of a new appointed Executive Vice President. The merger allows the Florida operations to benefit by leveraging the capital position of FirstBank Puerto Rico and thereby provide them with the support necessary to grow in the Florida market.
Virgin Islands Operations
     The Virgin Islands operations segment consists of all banking activities conducted by FirstBank in the U.S. and British Virgin Islands, including retail and commercial banking services. In 2002, after acquiring Chase Manhattan Bank operations in the Virgin Islands, FirstBank became the largest bank in the Virgin Islands (USVI & BVI), serving St. Thomas, St. Croix, St. John, Tortola and Virgin Gorda, with 16 branches. In 2008, FirstBank acquired the Virgin Island Community Bank (“VICB”) in St. Croix, increasing its customer base and share in this market. The Virgin Islands operations segment is driven by its consumer and commercial lending and deposit-taking activities. Loans to consumers include auto, boat, lines of credit, personal loans and residential mortgage loans. Deposit products include interest bearing and non-interest bearing checking and savings accounts, Individual Retirement Accounts (IRA) and retail certificates of deposit. Retail deposits gathered through each branch serve as the funding sources for the lending activities.

8


For information regarding First BanCorp’s reportable segments, please refer to Note 31,33, “Segment Information,” to the Corporation’s financial statements for the year ended December 31, 20082009 included in Item 8 of this Form 10-K.
Employees
     As of December 31, 2008,2009, the Corporation and its subsidiaries employed 2,9952,713 persons. None of its employees are represented by a collective bargaining group. The Corporation considers its employee relations to be good.
RECENT SIGNIFICANT EVENTS DURING 2009
Participation in the U.S. Treasury Department’s Capital Purchase Program
     On January 16, 2009, the Corporation entered into a Letter Agreement with the United States Department of the Treasury (“Treasury”) pursuant to which Treasury invested $400,000,000 in preferred stock of the Corporation under the Treasury’s Troubled Asset Relief Program Capital Purchase Program. Under the Letter Agreement, which incorporates the Securities Purchase Agreement — Standard Terms (the “Purchase Agreement”), the Corporation issued and sold to Treasury (1) 400,000 shares of the Corporation’s Fixed Rate Cumulative Perpetual Preferred Stock, Series F, $1,000 liquidation preference per share (the “Series F Preferred Stock”), and (2) a warrant dated January 16, 2009 (the “Warrant”) to purchase 5,842,259 shares of the Corporation’s common stock (the “Warrant shares”) at an exercise price of $10.27 per share. The exercise price of the Warrant was determined based upon the average of the closing prices of the Corporation’s common stock during the 20-trading day period ended December 19, 2008, the last trading day prior to the date the Corporation’s application to participate in the program was preliminarily approved. The Purchase Agreement is incorporated into Exhibit 10.4 hereto by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Corporation’s Form 8-K filed with the SEC on January 20, 2009.
     The Series F Preferred Stock qualifies as Tier 1 regulatory capital. Cumulative dividends on the Series F Preferred Stock will accrue on the liquidation preference amount on a quarterly basis at a rate of 5% per annum for the first five years, and thereafter at a rate of 9% per annum, but will only be paid when, as and if declared by the Corporation’s Board of Directors out of assets legally available therefore. The Series F Preferred Stock will rank pari passu with the Corporation’s existing 7.125% Noncumulative Perpetual Monthly Income Preferred Stock, Series A, 8.35% Noncumulative Perpetual Monthly Income Preferred Stock, Series B, 7.40% Noncumulative Perpetual Monthly Income Preferred Stock, Series C, 7.25% Noncumulative Perpetual Monthly Income Preferred Stock, Series D, and 7.00% Noncumulative Perpetual Monthly Income Preferred Stock, Series E, in terms of

8


dividend payments and distributions upon liquidation, dissolution and winding up of the Corporation. The Purchase Agreement contains limitations on the payment of dividends on common stock, including limiting regular quarterly cash dividends to an amount not exceeding the last quarterly cash dividend paid per share, or the amount publicly announced (if lower), of common stock prior to October 14, 2008, which is $0.07 per share. The ability of the Corporation to purchase, redeem or otherwise acquire for consideration, any shares of its common stock, preferred stock or trust preferred securities will beare subject to restrictions outlined in the Purchase Agreement.Agreement, including upon a default in the payment of dividends. The Corporation suspended the payment of dividends effective in August 2009. These restrictions will terminate on the earlier of (a) January 16, 2012 and (b) the date on which the Series F Preferred Stock is redeemed in whole or Treasury transfers all of the Series F Preferred Stock to third parties that are not affiliates of Treasury.
     The shares of Series F Preferred Stock are non-voting, other than having class voting rights on certain matters that could adversely affect the Series F Preferred Stock. If dividends on the Series F Preferred Stock have not been paid for an aggregate of six quarterly dividend periods or more, whether or not consecutive, the Corporation’s authorized number of directors will be increased automatically by two and the holders of the Series F Preferred Stock, voting together with holders of any then outstanding parity stock, will have the right to elect two directors to fill such newly created directorships at the Corporation’s next annual meeting of stockholders or at a special meeting of stockholders called for that purpose prior to such annual meeting. These preferred share directors will be elected annually and will serve until all accrued and unpaid dividends on the Series F Preferred Stock have been declared and paid in full.

9


     On January 13, 2009, the Corporation filed a Certificate of Designations (the“Certificate(the “Certificate of Designations”) with the Puerto Rico Department of State for the purpose of amending its Certificate of Incorporation to fix the designations, preferences, limitations and relative rights of the Series F Preferred Stock.
     As per the Purchase Agreement, prior to January 16, 2012, the Corporation may redeem, subject to the approval of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, the shares of Series F Preferred Stock only with proceeds from one or more “Qualified Equity Offerings,” as such term is defined in the Certificate of Designations. After January 16, 2012, the Corporation may redeem, subject to the approval of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, in whole or in part, out of funds legally available therefore, the shares of Series F Preferred Stock then outstanding. Pursuant to the recently enacted American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009, subject to consultation with the appropriate Federal banking agency, the Secretary of Treasury may permit a TARP recipient to repay any financial assistance previously provided under TARP without regard as to whether the financial institution has replaced such funds from any other source.
     The Warrant has a ten-year term and is exercisable at any time for 5,842,259 shares of First BanCorp common stock at an exercise price of $10.27. The exercise price and the number of shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of the Warrant are adjustable in a number of circumstances, as discussed below. The exercise price and the number of shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of the Warrant will be adjusted proportionately:
  in the event of a stock split, subdivision, reclassification or combination of the outstanding shares of common stock;
 
  until the earlier of the date the Treasury no longer holds the Warrant or any portion thereof or January 16, 2012, if the Corporation issues shares of common stock or securities convertible into common stock for no consideration or at a price per share that is less than 90% of the market price on the last trading day preceding the date of the pricing of such sale. Any amounts that the Corporation receives in connection with the issuance of such shares or convertible securities will be deemed to be equal to the sum of the net offering price of all such securities plus the minimum aggregate amount, if any, payable upon exercise or conversion of any such convertible securities; no adjustment will be required with respect to (i) consideration for or to fund business or asset acquisitions, (ii) shares issued in connection with employee benefit plans and compensation arrangements in the ordinary course consistent with past practice approved by the Corporation’s Board of Directors, (iii) a public or broadly marketed offering and sale by the Corporation or its affiliates of the Corporation’s common stock or convertible securities for cash pursuant to registration under the Securities Act or issuance under Rule 144A on a basis consistent with capital raising transactions by comparable financial institutions, and (iv) the exercise of preemptive rights on terms existing on January 16, 2009;

9


  in connection with the Corporation’s distributions to security holders (e.g., stock dividends);
 
  in connection with certain repurchases of common stock by the Corporation; and
 
  in connection with certain business combinations.
     None of the shares of Series F Preferred Stock, the Warrant, or the Warrant shares are subject to any contractual restriction on transfer, except that Treasury may not transfer or exercise an aggregate of more than one-half of the Warrant shares prior to the earlier of the date on which the Corporation receives proceeds from one or more Qualified Equity Offerings in an aggregate amount of at least $400,000,000 and December 31, 2009.
transfer. The Series F Preferred Stock and the Warrant were issued in a private placement exempt from registration pursuant to Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended. On February 13, 2009, theThe Corporation filed a Form S-3 registering theregistered for resale of the shares of Series F Preferred Stock, the Warrant and the Warrant shares, and the sale of the Warrant shares by the Corporation to any purchasers of the Warrant. In addition, under the shelf registration, filed on February 13, 2009, the Corporation registered the resale of 9,250,450 shares of common stock by or on behalf of the Bank of Nova Scotia, its pledges, donees, transferees or other successors in interest.
     Under the terms of the Purchase Agreement, (i) the Corporation amended its compensation, bonus, incentive and other benefit plans, arrangements and agreements (including severance and employment agreements), to the extent necessary to be in compliance with the executive compensation and corporate governance requirements of Section 111(b) of the Emergency Economic Stability Act of 2008 and applicable guidance or regulations issued by the Secretary of the Treasury on or prior to January 16, 2009 and (ii) each Senior

10


Executive Officer, as defined in the Purchase Agreement, executed a written waiver releasing Treasury and the Corporation from any claims that such officers may otherwise have as a result of the Corporation’s amendment of such arrangements and agreements to be in compliance with Section 111(b). Until such time as Treasury ceases to own any debt or equity securities of the Corporation acquired pursuant to the Purchase Agreement, the Corporation must maintain compliance with these requirements.

11


     Regulatory ActionsReduction of credit exposure with financial institutions
     On June 24, 2008, the FED, under the delegated authority of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, terminated the Order to Cease and Desist dated March 16, 2006 related to the mortgage-related transactions with other financial institutions.
     On January 16, 2009, the OTS rescinded the restrictions imposed in February 2006 on FirstBank Florida as a result of safety and soundness concerns derived from the Corporation’s announcement in December 2005 that it would restate its financial statements going back to 2002.
     The Corporation has continued working on the reduction of its credit exposure with Doral and R&G Financial. During the second quarter of 2009, the Bank purchased from R&G Financial $205 million of residential mortgages that previously served as collateral for a commercial loan extended to R&G . The purchase price of the transaction was retained by the Corporation to fully pay off the commercial loan, thereby significantly reducing the Corporation’s exposure to a single borrower. As of December 31, 2009, there still an outstanding balance of loans to Doral and R&G Financial amounted to $348.8$321.5 million and $218.9 million, respectively, as of December 31, 2008.due from Doral.
   Surrender of the license to transact business as an International Bank Agencystock savings and loans association charter in Florida
     Effective September 3, 2008,July 1, 2009 as part of the merger of FirstBank Florida with and into FirstBank Puerto Rico, FirstBank Florida surrendered its International Bank Agency licensestock savings and loans association charter granted on October 1, 2004 by the Financial Services CommissionOffice of Thrift Supervsion. Under the regulatory oversight of the Financial Regulation ofFederal Deposit Insurance Corporation and under the State of Florida.FirstBank Florida trade name, FirstBank continues offering essentiallyto offer the same services offered by the former stock savings and loans association through its former International Bank Agency through a loan production officebranch network in Florida.

10


   Dividend Suspension
     On July 30, 2009, after reporting a net loss for the quarter ended June 30, 2009, the Corporation announced that the Board of Directors resolved to suspend the payment of the common and preferred dividends, including the Series F Preferred Stock, effective with the preferred dividend payments for the month of August 2009.
Business Developments
     On January 28, 2008, FirstBank acquired Virgin Islands Community Bank (“VICB”) in St. Croix, U.S. Virgin Islands. VICB had three branches on the island of St. Croix and deposits of approximately $56 million at the time of acquisition.
     OnEffective July 31, 2008,1, 2009, the Corporation acquiredconsolidated the operations of FirstBank Florida, formerly a $218 million autostock savings and loan portfolio from Chrysler Financial Services Caribbean, LLC (“Chrysler”).association indirectly owned by the Corporation, with and into FirstBank Puerto Rico and dissolved Ponce General Corporation, former holding company of FirstBank Florida.
On October 31, 2009, First Leasing and Rental Corporation sold its motor vehicle rental operations and realized a nominal gain of $0.2 million.
   Credit Ratings
     The Corporation’s credit as long-term issuer is currently rated B by Standard & Poor’s (“S&P”) and B- by Fitch Ratings Limited (“Fitch”); both with negative outlook.
     FirstBank’s long-term senior debt rating is currently rated Ba1B1 by Moody’s Investor Service (“Moody’s”Moodys”), four notches below their definition of investment grade; B by S&P, and BB+B by Standard & Poor’s (“S&P”), one notchFitch, both five notches under their definition of investment grade. Fitch Ratings Ltd. (“Fitch”) has ratedThe outlook on the Corporation’s long-term senior debt a rating of BB, which is two notches under investment grade. However, theBank’s credit ratings outlook for Moody’s and S&P are stable while Fitch’sfrom the three rating agencies is negative.
   WEBSITE ACCESS TO REPORT
     The Corporation makes available annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K, and amendments to those reports, filed or furnished pursuant to section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, free of charge on or through its internet website atwww.firstbankpr.com, (under the “Investor Relations” section), as soon as reasonably practicable after the Corporation electronically files such material with, or furnishes it to, the SEC.
     The Corporation also makes available the Corporation’s corporate governance standards,guidelines, the charters of the audit, asset/liability, compensation and benefits, credit, strategic planning, corporate governance and nominating committees and the codes and principles mentioned below, free of charge on or through its internet website atwww.firstbankpr.com (under the “Investor Relations” section):
  Code of Ethics for Senior Financial Officers
 
  Code of Ethics applicable to all employees
 
  Independence Principles for Directors

12


     The corporate governance standards,guidelines, and the aforementioned charters and codes may also be obtained free of charge by sending a written request to Mr. Lawrence Odell, Executive Vice President and General Counsel, PO Box 9146, San Juan, Puerto Rico 00908.
     The public may read and copy any materials First BanCorp files with the SEC at the SEC’s Public Reference Room at 100 F Street, NE, Washington, DC 20549. In addition, the public may obtain information on the operation of the Public Reference Room by calling the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330. The SEC maintains an Internet site that contains reports, proxy, and information statements, and other information regarding issuers that file electronically with the SEC at its website (www.sec.gov).
MARKET AREA AND COMPETITION
     Puerto Rico, where the banking market is highly competitive, is the main geographic service area of the Corporation. As of December 31, 2008,2009, the Corporation also had a presence through its subsidiariesin the state of Florida and in the United States and British Virgin Islands and through its loan production office and its federally chartered stock savings and loan association in Florida (USA).Islands. Puerto Rico banks are subject to the same federal laws, regulations and supervision that apply to similar institutions in the United States mainland.
     Competitors include other banks, insurance companies, mortgage banking companies, small loan companies, automobile financing companies, leasing companies, vehicle rental companies, brokerage firms with retail

11


operations, and credit unions in Puerto Rico, the Virgin Islands and the state of Florida. The Corporation’s businesses compete with these other firms with respect to the range of products and services offered and the types of clients, customers, and industries served.
     The Corporation’s ability to compete effectively depends on the relative performance of its products, the degree to which the features of its products appeal to customers, and the extent to which the Corporation meets clients’ needs and expectations. The Corporation’s ability to compete also depends on its ability to attract and retain professional and other personnel, and on its reputation.
     The Corporation encounters intense competition in attracting and retaining deposits and its consumer and commercial lending activities. The Corporation competes for loans with other financial institutions, some of which are larger and have greater resources available than those of the Corporation. Management believes that the Corporation has been able to compete effectively for deposits and loans by offering a variety of transaction account products and loans with competitive features, by pricing its products at competitive interest rates, by offering convenient branch locations, and by emphasizing the quality of its service. The Corporation’s ability to originate loans depends primarily on the rates and fees charged and the service it provides to its borrowers in making prompt credit decisions. There can be no assurance that in the future the Corporation will be able to continue to increase its deposit base or originate loans in the manner or on the terms on which it has done so in the past.
SUPERVISION AND REGULATION
Recent Events affecting the Corporation
     Events since early 2008 affecting the financial services industry and, more generally, the financial markets and the economy as a whole, have led to various proposals for changes in the regulation of the financial services industry. In 2009, the House of Representatives passed the Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2009, which, among other things, calls for the establishment of a Consumer Financial Protection Agency having broad authority to regulate providers of credit, savings, payment and other consumer financial products and services; creates a new structure for resolving troubled or failed financial institutions; requires certain over-the-counter derivative transactions to be cleared in a central clearinghouse and/or effected on the exchange; revises the assessment base for the calculation of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”) assessments; and creates a structure to regulate systemically important financial companies, including providing regulators with the power to require such companies to sell or transfer assets and terminate activities if they determine that the size or scope of activities of the company pose a threat to the safety and soundness of the company or the financial stability of the United States. Other proposals have been made, including additional capital and liquidity requirements and limitations on size or types of activity in which banks may engage. It is not clear at this time which of these proposals will be finally

13


enacted into law, or what form they will take, or what new proposals may be made, as the debate over financial reform continues in 2010. The description below summarizes the current regulatory structure in which the Corporation operates. In the event the regulatory structure change significantly, the structure of the Corporation and the products and services it offers could also change significantly as a result.
   Bank Holding Company Activities and Other Limitations
     The Corporation is subject to ongoing regulation, supervision, and examination by the Federal Reserve Board, and is required to file with the Federal Reserve Board periodic and annual reports and other information concerning its own business operations and those of its subsidiaries. In addition, the Corporation is subject to regulation under the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956, as amended (“Bank Holding Company Act”). Under the provisions of the Bank Holding Company Act, a bank holding company must obtain Federal Reserve Board approval before it acquires direct or indirect ownership or control of more than 5% of the voting shares of another bank, or merges or consolidates with another bank holding company. The Federal Reserve Board also has authority under certain circumstances to issue cease and desist orders against bank holding companies and their non-bank subsidiaries.
     A bank holding company is prohibited under the Bank Holding Company Act, with limited exceptions, from engaging, directly or indirectly, in any business unrelated to the businesses of banking or managing or controlling banks. One of the exceptions to these prohibitions permits ownership by a bank holding company of the shares of any corporation if the Federal Reserve Board, after due notice and opportunity for hearing, by regulation or order has determined that the activities of the corporation in question are so closely related to the businesses of banking or managing or controlling banks as to be a proper incident thereto.
     Under the Federal Reserve Board policy, a bank holding company such as the Corporation is expected to act as a source of financial strength to its banking subsidiaries and to commit support to them. This support may be required at times when, absent such policy, the bank holding company might not otherwise provide such support. In the event of a bank holding company’s bankruptcy, any commitment by the bank holding company to a federal bank regulatory agency to maintain capital of a subsidiary bank will be assumed by the bankruptcy trustee and be entitled to a priority of payment. In addition, any capital loans by a bank holding company to any of its subsidiary banks must be subordinated in right of payment to deposits and to certain other indebtedness of such subsidiary bank. As of December 31, 2008,2009, FirstBank and FirstBank Florida werewas the only depository institution subsidiariessubsidiary of the Corporation.
     The Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (the “GLB Act”) revised and expanded the provisions of the Bank Holding Company Act by including a section that permits a bank holding company to elect to become a financial holding company and to permits to engage in a full range of financial activities. In April 2000, the Corporation filed an election with the Federal Reserve Board and became a financial holding company under the GLB Act. The GLB Act requires a bank holding company that elects to become a financial holding company to file a written declaration with the appropriate Federal Reserve Bank and comply with the following (and such compliance must continue while the entity is treated as a financial holding company): (i) state that the bank holding company elects to become

12


a financial holding company; (ii) provide the name and head office address of the bank holding company and each depository institution controlled by the bank holding company; (iii) certify that all depository institutions controlled by the bank holding company are well-capitalized as of the date the bank holding company files for the election; (iv) provide the capital ratios for all relevant capital measures as of the close of the previous quarter for each depository institution controlled by the bank holding company; and (v) certify that all depository institutions controlled by the bank holding company are well-managed as of the date the bank holding company files the election. All insured depository institutions controlled by the bank holding company must have also achieved at least a rating of “satisfactory record of meeting community credit needs” under the Community Reinvestment Act during the depository institution’s most recent examination.
     A financial holding company ceasing to meet these standards is subject to a variety of restrictions, depending on the circumstances. If the Federal Reserve Board determines that any of the financial holding company’s subsidiary depository institutions are either not well-capitalized or not well-managed, it must notify the financial holding company. Until compliance is restored, the Federal Reserve Board has broad discretion to impose appropriate limitations on the financial holding company’s activities. If compliance is not restored within 180 days, the Federal Reserve Board may ultimately require the financial holding company to divest its depository institutions or in the

14


alternative, to discontinue or divest any activities that are permitted only to non-financial holding company bank holding companies.
     The potential restrictions are different if the lapse pertains to the Community Reinvestment Act requirement. In that case, until all the subsidiary institutions are restored to at least “satisfactory” Community Reinvestment Act rating status, the financial holding company may not engage, directly or through a subsidiary, in any of the additional activities permissible under the GLB Act noror make additional acquisitions of companies engaged in the additional activities. However, completed acquisitions and additional activities and affiliations previously begun are left undisturbed, as the GLB Act does not require divestiture for this type of situation.
     Financial holding companies may engage, directly or indirectly, in any activity that is determined to be (i) financial in nature, (ii) incidental to such financial activity, or (iii) complementary to a financial activity and does not pose a substantial risk to the safety and soundness of depository institutions or the financial system generally. The GLB Act specifically provides that the following activities have been determined to be “financial in nature”: (a) lending, trust and other banking activities; (b) insurance activities; (c) financial or economic advice or services; (d) pooled investments; (e) securities underwriting and dealing; (f) existing bank holding company domestic activities; (g) existing bank holding company foreign activities; and (h) merchant banking activities. The Corporation offers insurance agency services through its wholly-owned subsidiary, FirstBank Insurance Agency and through First Insurance Agency V. I., Inc., a subsidiary of FirstBank. In association with JP Morgan Chase, the Corporation, through FirstBank Puerto Rico Securities, Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of FirstBank, also offers municipal bond underwriting services focused mainly on municipal and government bonds or obligations issued by the Puerto Rico government and its public corporations. Additionally, FirstBank Puerto Rico Securities, Inc. offers financial advisory services.
     In addition, the GLB Act specifically gives the Federal Reserve Board the authority, by regulation or order, to expand the list of “financial” or “incidental” activities, but requires consultation with the Treasury, and gives the Federal Reserve Board authority to allow a financial holding company to engage in any activity that is “complementary” to a financial activity and does not “pose a substantial risk to the safety and soundness of depository institutions or the financial system generally.”
     Under the GLB Act, if the Corporation fails to meet any of the requirements for being a financial holding company and is unable to resolve such deficiencies within certain prescribed periods of time, the Federal Reserve Board could require the Corporation to divest control of one or more of its depository institution subsidiaries or alternatively cease conducting financial activities that are not permissible for bank holding companies that are not financial holding companies.
   Sarbanes-Oxley Act
     The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (“SOA”) implemented a range of corporate governance and accounting measures to increase corporate responsibility, to provide for enhanced penalties for accounting and auditing improprieties at publicly traded companies, and to protect investors by improving the accuracy and reliability of disclosures under federal securities laws. In addition, SOA havehas established membership requirements and responsibilities for the audit committee, imposed restrictions on the relationship between the Corporation and external auditors, imposed additional responsibilities for the external financial statements on our chief executive officer and chief financial

13


officer, expanded the disclosure requirements for corporate insiders, required management to evaluate its disclosure controls and procedures and its internal control over financial reporting, and required the auditors to issue a report on the internal controlscontrol over financial reporting.
     Since the 2004 Annual Report on Form 10-K, the Corporation has included in its annual report on Form 10-K its management assessment regarding the effectiveness of the Corporation’s internal control over financial reporting. The internal control report includes a statement of management’s responsibility for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting for the Corporation; management’s assessment as to the effectiveness of the Corporation’s internal control over financial reporting based on management’s evaluation, as of year-end; and the framework used by management as criteria for evaluating the effectiveness of the Corporation’s internal control over financial reporting. As of December 31, 2008,2009, First BanCorp’s management concluded that its

15


internal control over financial reporting was effective. The Corporation’s independent registered public accounting firm reached to the same conclusion.
   Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008
     On October 3, 2008, the Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008 (the “EESA”) was signed into law. The EESA authorized the Treasury to access up to $700 billion to protect the U.S. economy and restore the confidence and stability to the financial markets. One such program under the Treasury Department’s Troubled Asset Relief Program (TARP) was action by Treasury to make significant investments in U.S. financial institutions through the Capital Purchase Program (CPP). The Treasury’s stated purpose forin implementing the CPP was to improve the capitalization of healthy institutions, which would improve the flow of credit to businesses and consumers, and boost the confidence of depositors, investors, and counterparties alike. All federal banking and thrift regulatory agencies encouraged eligible institutions to participate in the CPP.
     The Corporation applied for, and the Treasury approved, a capital purchase in the amount of $400,000,000. The Corporation entered into a Letter Agreement with the Treasury, pursuant to which the Corporation issued and sold to the Treasury for an aggregate purchase price of $400,000,000 in cash (i) 400,000 shares of the Series F Preferred Stock, and (2) the Warrant to purchase 5,842,259 shares of the Corporation’s common stock at an exercise price of $10.27 per share, subject to certain anti-dilution and other adjustments. The TARP transaction closed on January 16, 2009.
     The Federal Reserve has also developed an Asset-Backed Commercial Paper Money Market Fund Liquidity Facility (AMLF)Under the terms of the Letter Agreement with the Treasury, (i) the Corporation amended its compensation, bonus, incentive and other benefit plans, arrangements and agreements (including severance and employment agreements) to the extent necessary to be in compliance with the executive compensation and corporate governance requirements of Section 111(b) of the Emergency Economic Stability Act of 2008 and applicable guidance or regulations issued by the Secretary of Treasury on or prior to January 16, 2009 and (ii) each Senior Executive Officer, as defined in the Purchase Agreement, executed a written waiver releasing Treasury and the Commercial Paper Funding Facility (CPFF)Corporation from any claims that such officers may otherwise have as a result the Corporation’s amendment of such arrangements and agreements to be in compliance with Section 111(b). The AMLF provides loansUntil such time as Treasury ceases to depository institutions to purchase asset-backed commercial paper from money market mutual funds. The CPFF provides a liquidity backstop to U.S. issuersown any debt or equity securities of commercial paper. These facilities are presently authorized through April 30, 2009.
Future Legislation
     From time to time, legislation is introduced in Congress and state legislatures with respectthe Corporation acquired pursuant to the regulation of financial institutions. It is anticipated thatPurchase Agreement, the 111th Congress will consider legislation affecting financial institutions in its upcoming session. Such legislation may change banking statutes and our operating environment or that of our subsidiaries in substantial and unpredictable ways. We cannot determine the ultimate effect that potential legislation, if enacted, or any regulations issued to implement it, would have upon our financial condition or results of operations.
Financial Stability Plan
     On February 10, 2009, Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner outlined the Financial Stability Plan, a comprehensive plan to restore stability to the U.S. financial system. The Financial Stability Plan addresses the government’s strategy to strengthen the economy by getting credit flowing again to families and businesses, while imposing new measures and conditions to strengthen accountability, oversight and transparency on the financial institutions receiving funds from the government. These stronger monitoring conditions will be the new standards

14


applicable to new TARP recipients subsequent to the enactment of the Financial Stability Plan and such conditions do not apply retroactively to TARP recipients under EESA.Corporation must maintain compliance with these requirements.
   American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009
     On February 17, 2009, the Congress enacted the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (“Stimulus Act”). The Stimulus Act includes federal tax cuts, expansion of unemployment benefits and other social welfare provisions, and domestic spending in education, health care, and infrastructure, including the energy sector. The Stimulus Act includes new provisions relating to compensation paid by institutions that receive government assistance under TARP, including institutions that have already received such assistance.assistance, effectively amending the existing compensation and corporate governance requirements of Section 111(b) of the EESA. The provisions include restrictions on the amounts and forms of compensation payable, provision for possible reimbursement of previously paid compensation and a requirement that compensation be submitted to non-binding “say on pay” shareholders votes.
     On June 10, 2009, the Treasury issued regulations implementing the compensation requirements under ARRA, which amended the requirements of EESA. The regulations became applicable to existing and new TARP recipients upon publication in the Federal Register on June 15, 2009. The regulations make effective the compensation provisions of ARRA and include rules requiring: (i) review of prior compensation by a Special Master; (ii) restrictions on paying or accruing bonuses, retention awards or incentive compensation for certain employees; (iii) regular review of all employee compensation arrangements by the company’s senior risk officer and compensation committee to ensure that the arrangements do not encourage unnecessary and excessive risk-taking or manipulation of reporting earnings; (iv) recoupment of bonus payments based on materially inaccurate information; (v) prohibition on severance or change in control payments for certain employees; (vi) adoption of policies and procedures to avoid excessive luxury expenses; and (vii) mandatory “say on pay” votes (which was effective beginning in February 2009). In addition, the regulations also introduce several additional requirements and restrictions, including: (i) Special Master review of ongoing compensation in certain situations; (ii) prohibition on

16


tax gross-ups for certain employees; (iii) disclosure of perquisites; and (iv) disclosure regarding compensation consultants.
Homeowner Affordability and Stability Plan
     On February 18, 2009, President Obama announced a comprehensive plan to help responsible homeowners avoid foreclosure by providing affordable and sustainable mortgage loans. The Homeowner Affordability and Stability Plan, is parta $75 billion federal program, provides for a sweeping loan modification program targeted at borrowers who are at risk of foreclosure because their incomes are not sufficient to make their mortgage payments. It also includes refinancing opportunities for borrowers who are current on their mortgage payments but have been unable to refinance because their homes have decreased in value. Under the Homeowner Stability Initiative, Treasury will spend up to $50 billion dollars to make mortgage payments affordable and sustainable for middle-income American families that are at risk of foreclosure. Borrowers who are delinquent on the mortgage for their primary residence and borrowers who, due to a loss of income or increase in expenses, are struggling to keep their payments current may be eligible for a loan modification. Under the Homeowner Affordability and Stability Plan, borrowers who are current on their mortgage but have been unable to refinance because their house has decreased in value may have the opportunity to refinance into a 30-year, fixed-rate loan. Through the program, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac will allow the refinancing of mortgage loans that they hold in their portfolios or that they guarantee in their own mortgage-backed securities. Lenders were able to begin accepting refinancing applications on March 4, 2009. The Obama Administration announced on March 4, 2009 the new U.S. Department of the U.S. government stimulus plan.Treasury guidelines to enable servicers to begin modifications of eligible mortgages under the Homeowner Affordability and Stability Plan. The plan will help homeowners restructure or refinance theirguidelines implement financial incentives for mortgage lenders to modify existing first mortgages to avoid foreclosure. Treasury is expected to issue detailed protocols and guidelinessets standard industry practice for loss mitigation programs by March 4, 2009.modifications.
   Temporary Liquidity Guarantee Program
     On November 21,The FDIC adopted the Temporary Liquidity Guarantee Program (“TLGP”) in October 2008 following a determination of systemic risk by the Secretary of the Treasury (after consultation with the President) that systemic risk existedwas supported by recommendations from the FDIC and the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System. The TLGP is part of a coordinated effort by the FDIC, the Treasury, and the Federal Reserve System to address unprecedented disruptions in the credit markets and the resultant difficulty of many financial institutions to obtain funds and to make loans to creditworthy borrowers. On October 23, 2008, the FDIC’s Board of Directors (Board) authorized the publication in the Federal Register of an interim rule that outlined the structure of the TLGP. The interim rule was finalized and a final rule was published in the Federal Register on November 26, 2008. Designed to assist in the stabilization of the nation’s financial sector,system, the FDIC adopted a Final Rule to implement its Temporary LiquidityFDIC’s TLGP is composed of two distinct components: the Debt Guarantee Program (“TLG Program”DGP”). The TLG Program, designed to avoid or mitigate adverse effects of economic conditions on financial stability, has two primary components: The Debt Guarantee Program, by which the FDIC will guarantee the payment of certain newly issued senior unsecured debt issued by the depository institution, and the Transaction Account Guarantee Program by which(“TAG program”). Under the DGP, the FDIC will guaranteeguarantees certain noninterest-bearing transaction accounts. The goal of the TLG Program is to decrease the cost of funding to the bank so that bank lending to consumers and businesses will normalize.
     The Debt Guarantee Program temporarily would guarantee all newly issued senior unsecured debt up to prescribed limits issued by participating entities. Under the TAG program, the FDIC guarantees all funds held in qualifying noninterest-bearing transaction accounts at participating insured depository institutions (“IDIs”). The DGP initially permitted participating entities on or after October 14, 2008, through and including June 30, 2009. As a result of this guarantee, the unpaid principal and contract interest of an entity’s newly issuedto issue FDIC-guaranteed senior unsecured debt would be paid by the FDIC upon a payment default. The debt eligible for coverage under the Debt Guarantee Program has to be issued by participating entities on or beforeuntil June 30, 2009. The FDIC agreed to2009, with the FDIC’s guarantee for such debt untilto expire on the earlier of the maturity date of the debt (or the conversion date, for mandatory convertible debt) or June 30, 2012. To reduce the potential for market disruptions at the conclusion of the DGP and to begin the orderly phase-out of the program, on May 29, 2009 the Board issued a final rule that extended for four months the period during which certain participating entities could issue FDIC-guaranteed debt. All IDIs and those other participating entities that had issued FDIC-guaranteed debt on or before April 1, 2009 were permitted to participate in the extended DGP without application to the FDIC. Other participating entities that received approval from the FDIC also were permitted to participate in the extended DGP. The expiration of the guarantee period was also extended from June 30, 2012 to December 31, 2012. As a result, all such participating entities were permitted to issue FDIC-guaranteed debt through and including October 31, 2009, with the FDIC’s guarantee expiring on the earliest of the debt’s mandatory conversion date (for mandatory convertible debt), the stated maturity date, or December 31, 2012.
     On October 20, 2009, the FDIC established a limited, six-month emergency guarantee facility upon expiration of the DGP. Under this emergency guarantee facility, certain participating entities can apply to the FDIC for permission to issue FDIC-guaranteed debt during the period starting October 31, 2009 through April 30, 2010. The fee for issuing debt under the emergency facility will be at least 300 basis points, which the FDIC reserves the right to increase on a case-by-case basis, depending upon the risks presented by the issuing entity. The TAG Program has

17


been extended until June 30, 2012.
2010. The Transaction Account Guarantee Program provides for a temporary full guarantee by the FDIC for funds held at FDIC-insured depository institutions in non interest-bearing transaction accounts above the existing deposit insurance limit. This coverage became effective on October 14, 2008, and would continue through December 31, 2009 (assuming that the insured depository institution does not opt-outcost of this component of the TLG Program). Under the Transaction Account Guarantee Program, a participating institution will be able to provide customers full coverage on non-interest bearing transaction accounts, as defined in the Interim Rule, for an annual fee of 10 basis points. The coverage will be in effect for participating institutions until the end of 2009. After that date these accounts will be subject to the basic insurance amount.
     FirstBank is participating in the TLG; however,program increased after December 31, 2009. Separately, Congress extended the temporary increase in the standard coverage limit to date, no senior unsecured debt has been issued under this program by FirstBank.$250,000 until December 31, 2013. FirstBank currently participates in the TLGP solely through the TAG program.
   USA Patriot Act
     Under Title III of the USA Patriot Act, also known as the International Money Laundering Abatement and Anti-Terrorism Financing Act of 2001, all financial institutions are required to, among other things, identify their customers, adopt formal and comprehensive anti-money laundering programs, scrutinize or prohibit altogether certain transactions of special concern, and be prepared to respond to inquiries from U.S. law enforcement agencies

15


concerning their customers and their transactions. Presently, only certain types of financial institutions (including banks, savings associations and money services businesses) are subject to final rules implementing the anti-money laundering program requirements of the USA Patriot Act.
     Failure of a financial institution to comply with the USA Patriot Act’s requirements could have serious legal and reputational consequences for the institutions. The Corporation has adopted appropriate policies, procedures and controls to address compliance with the USA Patriot Act and Treasury regulations.
   Privacy Policies
     Under Title V of the GLB Act, all financial institutions are required to adopt privacy policies, restrict the sharing of nonpublic customer data with parties at the customer’s request and establish policies and procedures to protect customer data from unauthorized access. The Corporation and its subsidiaries have adopted policies and procedures in order to comply with the privacy provisions of the GLB Act and the Fair and Accurate Credit Transaction Act of 2003 and the regulations issued thereunder.
   State Chartered Non-Member Bank; Federal Savings Bank;Bank and Banking Laws and Regulations in General
     FirstBank is subject to regulation and examination by the OCIF and the FDIC, and is subject to certain requirements established by the Federal Reserve Board. FirstBank Florida is a federally regulated savings and loan bank subject to regulation and examination by the OTS, and subject to certain Federal Reserve regulations. The federal and state laws and regulations which are applicable to banks and savings banks regulate, among other things, the scope of their businesses, their investments, their reserves against deposits, the timing and availability of deposited funds, and the nature and amount of and collateral for certain loans. In addition to the impact of regulations, commercial banks are affected significantly by the actions of the Federal Reserve Board as it attempts to control the money supply and credit availability in order to influence the economy. Among the instruments used by the Federal Reserve Board to implement these objectives are open market operations in U.S. government securities, adjustments of the discount rate, and changes in reserve requirements against bank deposits. These instruments are used in varying combinations to influence overall economic growth and the distribution of credit, bank loans, investments and deposits. Their use also affects interest rates charged on loans or paid on deposits. The monetary policies and regulations of the Federal Reserve Board have had a significant effect on the operating results of commercial banks in the past and are expected to continue to do so in the future. The effects of such policies upon our future business, earnings, and growth cannot be predicted.
     References herein to applicable statutes or regulations are brief summaries of portions thereof which do not purport to be complete and which are qualified in their entirety by reference to those statutes and regulations. Any change in applicable laws or regulations may have a material adverse effect on the business of commercial banks, thrifts and bank holding companies, including FirstBank FirstBank Florida and the Corporation. However, management is not aware of any current proposals by any federal or state regulatory authority that, if implemented, would have or would be reasonably likely to have a material effect on the liquidity, capital resources or operations of FirstBank, FirstBank Florida or the Corporation.
     As a creditor and financial institution, FirstBank is subject to certain regulations promulgated by the Federal Reserve Board, including, without limitation, Regulation B (Equal Credit Opportunity Act), Regulation DD (Truth in Savings Act), Regulation E (Electronic Funds Transfer Act), Regulation F (Limits on Exposure to Other Banks), Regulation O (Loans to Executive Officers, Directors and Principal Shareholders), Regulation W (Transactions Between Member Banks and Their Affiliates), Regulation Z (Truth in Lending Act), Regulation CC (Expedited Funds Availability Act), Regulation X (Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act), Regulation BB (Community Reinvestment Act) and Regulation C (Home Mortgage Disclosure Act).

18


     During 2008, federal agencies adopted revisions to several rules and regulations that will impact lenders and secondary market activities. In 2008, the Federal Reserve Bank revised Regulation Z, adopted under the Truth in Lending Act (TILA) and the Home Ownership and Equity Protection Act (HOEPA), by adopting a final rule which prohibits unfair, abusive or deceptive home mortgage lending practices and restricts certain mortgage lending practices. The final rule also establishes advertisement standards and requires certain mortgage disclosures to be given to the consumers earlier in the transaction. The rule iswas effective in October 2009. The final rule regarding the

16


TILA also includes amendments revising disclosures in connection with credit cards accounts and other revolving credit plans to ensure that information provided to customers is provided in a timely manner and in a form that is readily understandable.
     Other changes to regulations that will enter into effect during 2009 and 2010 which may require a review of procedures and disclosure to customers are: Home Mortgage Disclosure Act (HMDA) — changes in the rate spread to be reported under HMDA (effective in October 2009); Real Estate Settlement and Procedures Act (RESPA) which provides a new standard three page Good Faith Estimate (GFE) with additional disclosures and requirements for lenders (main changes are effective in January 2010); Flood Insurance — changes in the Standard Flood and Hazard Determination Form (effective in June 2009); Unfair and Deceptive Practices Act with prohibitions from engaging in certain acts or practices in connection with consumer credit card accounts and Truth in Savings Act — new special disclosures covering overdraft lines of credit (effective in January, 2010).
There are periodic examinations by the OCIF and the FDIC of FirstBank and by the OTS of FirstBank Florida to test each bank’sthe Bank’s compliance with various statutory and regulatory requirements. This regulation and supervision establishes a comprehensive framework of activities in which an institution can engage and is intended primarily for the protection of the FDIC’s insurance fund and depositors. The regulatory structure also gives the regulatory authorities discretion in connection with their supervisory and enforcement activities and examination policies, including policies with respect to the classification of assets and the establishment of adequate loan loss reserves for regulatory purposes. This enforcement authority includes, among other things, the ability to assess civil money penalties, to issue cease-and-desist or removal orders and to initiate injunctive actions against banking organizations and institution-affiliated parties. In general, these enforcement actions may be initiated for violations of laws and regulations and for engaging in unsafe or unsound practices. In addition, certain bank actions are required by statute and implementing regulations. Other actions or failure to act may provide the basis for enforcement action, including the filing of misleading or untimely reports with regulatory authorities.
   Dividend Restrictions
     The Corporation is subject to certain restrictions generally imposed on Puerto Rico corporations with respect to the declaration and payment of dividends (i.e., that dividends may be paid out only from the Corporation’s net assets in excess of capital or, in the absence of such excess, from the Corporation’s net earnings for such fiscal year and/or the preceding fiscal year). The Federal Reserve Board has also issued a policy statement that as a matter of prudent banking, a bank holding company should generally not maintain a given rate of cash dividends unless its net income available to common shareholders has been sufficient to fund fully the dividends and the prospective rate of earnings retention appears to be consistent with the organization’s capital needs, asset quality, and overall financial condition.
On February 24, 2009, the Federal Reserve published the “Applying Supervisory Guidance and Regulations on the Payment of Dividends, Stock Redemptions, and Stock Repurchases at Bank Holding Companies” (the “Supervisory Letter”) which discusses the ability of bank holding companies to declare dividends and to redeem or repurchase equity securities. The Supervisory Letter is generally consistent with prior Federal Reserve supervisory policies and guidance, although places greater emphasis on discussions with the regulators prior to dividend declarations and redemption or repurchase decisions even when not explicitly required by the regulations. The Federal Reserve provides that the principles discussed in the letter are applicable to all bank holding companies, but are especially relevant for bank holding companies that are either experiencing financial difficulties and/or receiving public funds under the Treasury’s TARP Capital Purchase Program. To that end, the Supervisory Letter specifically addresses the Federal Reserve’s supervisory considerations for TARP participants.
     The Supervisory Letter provides that a board of directors should “eliminate, defer, or severely limit” dividends if: (i) the bank holding company’s net income available to shareholders for the past four quarters, net of dividends paid during that period, is not sufficient to fully fund the dividends; (ii) the bank holding company’s rate of earnings retention is inconsistent with capital needs and overall macroeconomic outlook; or (iii) the bank holding company will not meet, or is in danger of not meeting, its minimum regulatory capital adequacy ratios. The Supervisory Letter further suggests that bank holding companies should inform the Federal Reserve in advance of paying a dividend that: (i) exceeds the earnings for the quarter in which the dividend is being paid; or (ii) could result in a material adverse change to the organization’s capital structure.
     As of December 31, 2008,2009, the principal source of funds for the Corporation’s parent holding company is dividends declared and paid by its subsidiary, FirstBank. The ability of FirstBank to declare and pay dividends on its

19


capital stock is regulated by the Puerto Rico Banking Law, the Federal Deposit Insurance Act (the “FDIA”), and FDIC regulations. In general terms, the Puerto Rico Banking Law provides that when the expenditures of a bank are greater than receipts, the excess of expenditures over receipts shall be charged against undistributed profits of the bank and the balance, if any, shall be charged against the required reserve fund of the bank. If the reserve fund is not sufficient to cover such balance in whole or in part, the outstanding amount must be charged against the bank’s capital account. The Puerto Rico Banking Law provides that, until said capital has been restored to its original amount and the reserve fund to 20% of the original capital, the bank may not declare any dividends.
     In general terms, the FDIA and the FDIC regulations restrict the payment of dividends when a bank is undercapitalized, when a bank has failed to pay insurance assessments, or when there are safety and soundness concerns regarding such bank.
     In addition, the Purchase Agreement entered into with the Treasury contains limitations on the payment of dividends on common stock, including limiting regular quarterly cash dividends to an amount not exceeding the last quarterly cash dividend paid per share, or the amount publicly announced (if lower), of common stock prior to October 14, 2008, which is $0.07 per share. Also, upon issuance of the Series F Preferred Stock, the ability of the Corporation to purchase, redeem or otherwise acquire for consideration, any shares of its common stock, preferred

17


stock or trust preferred securities will beis subject to restrictions.restrictions, including limitations when the Corporation has not paid dividends. These restrictions will terminate on the earlier of (a) the third anniversary of the closing date of the issuance of the Series F Preferred Stock and (b) the date on which the Series F Preferred Stock has been redeemed in whole or Treasury has transferred all of the Series F Preferred Stock to third parties that are not affiliates of Treasury. The restrictions described in this paragraph are set forth in the Purchase Agreement.
     On July 30, 2009, after reporting a net loss for the quarter ended June 30, 2009, the Corporation announced that the Board of Directors resolved to suspend the payment of the common and preferred dividends, including the TARP preferred dividends, effective with the preferred dividend payments for the month of August 2009.
Limitations on Transactions with Affiliates and Insiders
     Certain transactions between financial institutions such as FirstBank and FirstBank Florida andits affiliates are governed by Sections 23A and 23B of the Federal Reserve Act and by Regulation W. An affiliate of a financial institution is any corporation or entity, that controls, is controlled by, or is under common control with the financial institution. In a holding company context, the parent bank holding company and any companies which are controlled by such parent bank holding company are affiliates of the financial institution. Generally, Sections 23A and 23B of the Federal Reserve Act (i) limit the extent to which the financial institution or its subsidiaries may engage in “covered transactions” (defined below) with any one affiliate to an amount equal to 10% of such financial institution’s capital stock and surplus, and contain an aggregate limit on all such transactions with all affiliates to an amount equal to 20% of such financial institution’s capital stock and surplus and (ii) require that all “covered transactions” be on terms substantially the same, or at least as favorable to the financial institution or affiliate, as those provided to a non-affiliate. The term “covered transaction” includes the making of loans, purchase of assets, issuance of a guarantee and other similar transactions. In addition, loans or other extensions of credit by the financial institution to the affiliate are required to be collateralized in accordance with the requirements set forth in Section 23A of the Federal Reserve Act.
     The GLB Act requires that financial subsidiaries of banks be treated as affiliates for purposes of Sections 23A and 23B of the Federal Reserve Act, but (i) the 10% capital limitation on transactions between the bank and such financial subsidiary as an affiliate is not applicable, and (ii) notwithstanding other provisions in Sections 23A and 23B, the investment by the bank in the financial subsidiary does not include retained earnings of the financial subsidiary. The GLB Act provides that: (1) any purchase of, or investment in, the securities of a financial subsidiary by any affiliate of the parent bank is considered a purchase or investment by the bank; and (2) if the Federal Reserve Board determines that such treatment is necessary, any loan made by an affiliate of the parent bank to the financial subsidiary is to be considered a loan made by the parent bank.
     The Federal Reserve Board has adopted Regulation W which interprets the provisions of Sections 23A and 23B. The regulation unifies and updates staff interpretations issued over the years, incorporates several new interpretations and provisions (such as to clarify when transactions with an unrelated third party will be attributable

20


to an affiliate), and addresses new issues arising as a result of the expanded scope of nonbanking activities engaged in by banks and bank holding companies in recent years and authorized for financial holding companies under the GLB Act.
     In addition, Sections 22(h) and (g) of the Federal Reserve Act, implemented through Regulation O, place restrictions on loans to executive officers, directors, and principal stockholders. Under Section 22(h) of the Federal Reserve Act, loans to a director, an executive officer, a greater than 10% stockholder of a financial institution, and certain related interests of these, may not exceed, together with all other outstanding loans to such persons and affiliated interests, the financial institution’s loans-to-oneloans to one borrower limit, generally equal to 15% of the institution’s unimpaired capital and surplus. Section 22(h) of the Federal Reserve Act also requires that loans to directors, executive officers, and principal stockholders be made on terms substantially the same as offered in comparable transactions to other persons and also requires prior board approval for certain loans. In addition, the aggregate amount of extensions of credit by a financial institution to insiders cannot exceed the institution’s unimpaired capital and surplus. Furthermore, Section 22(g) of the Federal Reserve Act places additional restrictions on loans to executive officers.
     Federal Reserve Board Capital Requirements
     The Federal Reserve Board has adopted capital adequacy guidelines pursuant to which it assesses the adequacy of capital in examining and supervising a bank holding company and in analyzing applications to it under the Bank

18


Holding Company Act. The Federal Reserve Board capital adequacy guidelines generally require bank holding companies to maintain total capital equal to 8% of total risk-adjusted assets, with at least one-half of that amount consisting of Tier I or core capital and up to one-half of that amount consisting of Tier II or supplementary capital. Tier I capital for bank holding companies generally consists of the sum of common stockholders’ equity and perpetual preferred stock, subject in the case of the latter to limitations on the kind and amount of such perpetual preferred stock that may be included as Tier I capital, less goodwill and, with certain exceptions, other intangibles. Tier II capital generally consists of hybrid capital instruments, perpetual preferred stock that is not eligible to be included as Tier I capital, term subordinated debt and intermediate-term preferred stock and, subject to limitations, allowances for loan losses. Assets are adjusted under the risk-based guidelines to take into account different risk characteristics, with the categories ranging from 0% (requiring no additional capital) for assets such as cash to 100% for the bulk of assets, which are typically held by a bank holding company, including multi-family residential and commercial real estate loans, commercial business loans and commercial loans. Off-balance sheet items also are adjusted to take into account certain risk characteristics.
     In addition to theThe federal bank regulatory agencies’ risk-based capital requirements,guidelines for years have been based upon the Federal Reserve Board requires bank holding companies to maintain a minimum leverage1988 capital ratioaccord (“Basel I”) of Tier I capital to total assets of 3.0%. Total assets for purposes of this calculation do not include goodwill and any other intangible assets and investments that the Federal Reserve Board determines should be deducted. The Federal Reserve Board has announced that the 3.0% Tier I leverage capital ratio requirement is the minimum for the top-rated bank holding companies without supervisory, financial or operational weaknesses or deficiencies or those which are not experiencing or anticipating significant growth. Other bank holding companies will be expected to maintain Tier I leverage capital ratios of at least 4.0% or more, depending on their overall condition. The Federal Reserve Board’s guidelines also provide that bank holding companies experiencing internal growth or making acquisitions are expected to maintain capital positions substantially above the minimum supervisory levels without significant reliance on intangible assets. Furthermore, the guidelines indicate that the Federal Reserve Board will continue to consider a “tangible tier 1 leverage ratio” (i.e., after deducting all intangibles) in evaluating proposals for expansion or new activities. As of December 31, 2008, the Corporation exceeded each of its capital requirements and was a well-capitalized institution as defined in the Federal Reserve Board regulations.
     The federal banking agencies are currently analyzing regulatory capital requirements as part of an effort to implement the Basel Committee, on Banking Supervision’sa committee of central bankers and bank supervisors from the major industrialized countries. This body develops broad policy guidelines for use by each country’s supervisors in determining the supervisory policies they apply. In 2004, it proposed a new capital adequacy framework (“Basel II”) for large, internationally active banking organizations (Basel II), as well as to update their risk-based capital standards to enhance the risk-sensitivity of the capital charges, to reflect changes in accounting standards and financial markets, and to address competitive equity questions that may be raised by U.S. implementation of thereplace Basel I. Basel II framework. Accordingly,was designed to produce a more risk-sensitive result than its predecessor. However, certain portions of Basel II entail complexities and costs that were expected to preclude their practical application to the majority of U.S. banking organizations that lack the economies of scale needed to absorb the associated expenses.
     Effective April 1, 2008, the U.S. federal bank regulatory agencies includingadopted Basel II for application to certain banking organizations in the Federal Reserve Board and the FDIC, are considering several revisions to regulations issued in response to an earlier set of standards published by the Basel Committee in 1988 (Basel I). On September 25, 2006, the banking agencies proposed in a notice of proposal aUnited States. The new risk-based capital adequacy framework under Basel II. The framework is intendedapplies to produce risk-based capital requirements that are more risk-sensitive than the existing risk-based capital rules. On February 15, 2007, U.S. banking agencies released proposed supervisory guidance to accompany the September Basel II notice of proposed rulemaking. The guidance includes standards to promote safety and soundness and to encourage the comparability of regulatory capital measures across banks.
     A final rule implementing advanced approaches of Basel II was published jointly by the U.S. banking agencies on December 7, 2007. This rule establishes regulatory capital requirements and supervisory expectations for credit and operational risks for banks that choose or are required to adopt the advanced approaches, and articulates enhanced standards for the supervisory review of capital adequacy for those banks. The final rule retains the three groups of banks identified in the proposed rule:organizations that: (i) large or internationally active banks that are required to adopt advanced capital approaches under Basel II (core banks); (ii) banks that voluntarily decide to adopt the advance approaches (opt-in banks); and (iii) banks that do not adopt the advanced approaches (general banks), and for which the provisions of the final rule are inapplicable. The final rule also retains the proposed rule definition of a core bank as a bank that meets either of two criteria: (i)have consolidated assets of at least $250 billion or more,billion; or (ii) have consolidated total on-balance-sheeton-balance sheet foreign exposureexposures of at least $10 billionbillion; or more. Also,(iii) are eligible to, and elect to, opt-in to the new framework even though not required to do so under clause (i) or (ii) above; or (iv) as a bank is a core bank if it is a subsidiarygeneral matter, are subsidiaries of a bank or bank holding company that uses advanced approaches. At this moment, the provisions ofnew rule. During a two-year phase in period, organizations required or electing to apply Basel II will report their capital adequacy calculations separately under both Basel I and Basel II on a “parallel run” basis. Given the high thresholds noted above, FirstBank is not required to apply Basel II and does not expect to apply it in the foreseeable future.
     On January 21, 2010, the federal banking agencies, including the Federal Reserve Board, issued a final risk-based regulatory capital rule are not applicablerelated to the Corporation.Financial Accounting Standards Board’s adoption of amendments to the accounting requirements relating to transfers of financial assets and variable interests in variable interest entities.

1921


These accounting standards make substantive changes to how banks account for securitized assets that are currently excluded from their balance sheets as of the beginning of the Corporation’s 2010 fiscal year. The agencies expectfinal regulatory capital rule seeks to publishbetter align regulatory capital requirements with actual risks. Under the final rule, banks affected by the new accounting requirements generally will be subject to higher minimum regulatory capital requirements.
     The final rule permits banks to include without limit in tier 2 capital any increase in the near futureallowance for lease and loan losses calculated as of the implementation date that is attributable to assets consolidated under the requirements of the variable interests accounting requirements. The rule provides an optional delay and phase-in for a proposed rule that would provide all non-core banks withmaximum of one year for the option to adopt a standardized approach under Basel II. Implementation of Basel II may be delayed, or Basel II may be modified to address issueseffect on risk-based capital and the allowance for lease and loan losses related to the financial crisis of 2008.
FDIC Risk-Based Assessment System
     Under the Federal Deposit Insurance Reform Act of 2005, the FDIC adopted a new risk-based premium system for FDIC deposit insurance, providing for quarterly assessments of FDIC insured institutions based on their respective rankings in one of four risk categories depending upon their examination ratings and capital ratios. Beginning in 2007, well-capitalized institutions with certain “CAMELS” ratings (under the Uniform Financial Institutions Examination System adopted by the Federal Financial Institutions Examination Council) were grouped in Risk Category I and were assessed for deposit insurance premiums at an annual rate, with the assessment rate for the particular institution toassets that must be determined according to a formula based on a weighted average of the institution’s individual CAMELS component ratings plus either a set of financial ratios or the average ratings of its long-term debt. Institutions in Risk Categories II, III and IV are assessed premiums at progressively higher rates. Both, FirstBank and FirstBank Florida are presently designated a Risk Category I institution.
     After the passage of the EESA, the FDIC also increased deposit insurance for all deposit accounts up to $250,000 per account as of October 3, 2008 and ending December 31, 2009. On December 16, 2008, the FDIC Board of Directors determined deposit insurance assessment rates for the first quarter of 2009. Risk Category I Institutions were assessed at a rate between 12 and 14 basis points, for every $100 of deposits, an increase from last year’s rate range of 5 to 7 basis points. Effective April 1, 2009, the FDIC will change the way its assessment system differentiates for risk, making corresponding changes to assessment rates beginning with the second quarter of 2009, and make certain technical and other changes to these rules. On February 27, 2009, the FDIC approved charging banks an emergency special assessment of 20 cents per $100 insured deposits that would be collected in the third quarter of 2009 and agreed to increase fees it will begin charging banks in April 2009 to a range of 12 cents to 16 cents per $100 deposit. The Corporation expects an estimated charge of approximately $25 million resulting from the emergency special assessment in 2009 and an increase of approximately $13 million in the deposit insurance premium expense for 2009, as compared to 2008,consolidated as a result of the increaseaccounting change. The final rule also eliminates the risk-based capital exemption for asset-backed commercial paper assets. The transitional relief does not apply to the leverage ratio or to assets in conduits to which a bank provides implicit support. Banks will be required to rebuild capital and repair balance sheets to accommodate the regularnew accounting standards by the middle of 2011.
Deposit Insurance
     Under current FDIC regulations, each depository institution is assigned to a risk category based on capital and supervisory measures. In 2009, the FDIC revised the method for calculating the assessment rate for depository institutions by introducing several adjustments to an institution’s initial base assessment rate. TheA depository institution is assessed premiums by the FDIC is required by law to returnbased on its risk category as adjusted and the insurance reserve ratio to a 1.15 percent ratio no later thanamount of deposits held. Higher levels of banks failures over the end of 2013. Recent failures caused that ratio to fall to 0.40 percent at the endpast two years have dramatically increased resolution costs of the fourth quarterFDIC and depleted the deposit insurance fund. In addition, the amount of 2008.FDIC insurance coverage for insured deposits has been increased generally from $100,000 per depositor to $250,000 per depositor. In light of the increased stress on the deposit insurance fund caused by these developments, and in order to maintain a strong funding position and restore the reserve ratios of the deposit insurance fund, the FDIC: (i) imposed a special assessment in June, 2009, (ii) increased assessment rates of insured institutions generally, and (iii) required them to prepay on December 30, 2009 the premiums that are expected to become due over the next three years. FirstBank obtained a waiver from the FDIC to make such prepayment.
   FDIC Capital Requirements
     The FDIC has promulgated regulations and a statement of policy regarding the capital adequacy of state-chartered non-member banks like FirstBank. These requirements are substantially similar to those adopted by the Federal Reserve Board regarding bank holding companies, as described above. In addition, FirstBank Florida must comply with similar capital requirements adopted by the OTS.
     The regulators require that banks meet a risk-based capital standard. The risk-based capital standard for banks requires the maintenance of total capital (which is defined as Tier I capital and supplementary (Tier 2) capital) to risk-weighted assets of 8%. In determining the amount of risk-weighted assets, weights used (ranging from 0% to 100%) are based on the risks inherent in the type of asset or item. The components of Tier I capital are equivalent to those discussed below under the 3.0% leverage capital standard. The components of supplementary capital include certain perpetual preferred stock, mandatorily convertible securities, subordinated debt and intermediate preferred stock and, generally, allowances for loan and lease losses. Allowance for loan and lease losses includable in supplementary capital is limited to a maximum of 1.25% of risk-weighted assets. Overall, the amount of capital counted toward supplementary capital cannot exceed 100% of core capital.
     The capital regulations of the FDIC and the OTS establish a minimum 3.0% Tier I capital to total assets requirement for the most highly-rated state-chartered, non-member banks, with an additional cushion of at least 100 to 200 basis points for all other state-chartered, non-member banks, which effectively will increase the minimum Tier I leverage ratio for such other banks from 4.0% to 5.0% or more. Under these regulations, the highest-rated banks are those that are not anticipating or experiencing significant growth and have well-diversified risk, including no undue interest rate risk exposure, excellent asset quality, high liquidity and good earnings and, in general, are considered a strong banking organization and are rated composite I under the Uniform Financial Institutions Rating System. Leverage or core capital is defined as the sum of common stockholders’ equity including retained earnings, non-cumulative perpetual preferred stock and related surplus, and minority interests in consolidated subsidiaries,

20


minus all intangible assets other than certain qualifying supervisory goodwill and certain purchased mortgage servicing rights.

22


     In August 1995, the FDIC and OTS published a final rule modifying theirits existing risk-based capital standards to provide for consideration of interest rate risk when assessing the capital adequacy of a bank. Under the final rule, the FDIC must explicitly include a bank’s exposure to declines in the economic value of its capital due to changes in interest rates as a factor in evaluating a bank’s capital adequacy. In June 1996, the FDIC and OTS adopted a joint policy statement on interest rate risk. Because market conditions, bank structure, and bank activities vary, the agenciesagency concluded that each bank needs to develop its own interest rate risk management program tailored to its needs and circumstances. The policy statement describes prudent principles and practices that are fundamental to sound interest rate risk management, including appropriate board and senior management oversight and a comprehensive risk management process that effectively identifies, measures, monitors and controls such interest rate risk.
     Failure to meet capital guidelines could subject an insured bank to a variety of prompt corrective actions and enforcement remedies under the FDIA (as amended by Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation Improvement Act of 1991 (“FDICIA”), and the Riegle Community Development and Regulatory Improvement Act of 1994, including, with respect to an insured bank, the termination of deposit insurance by the FDIC, and certain restrictions on its business.
     Under certain circumstances, a well-capitalized, adequately capitalized or undercapitalized institution may be treated as if the institution were in the next lower capital category. A depository institution is generally prohibited from making capital distributions (including paying dividends), or paying management fees to a holding company if the institution would thereafter be undercapitalized. Institutions that are adequately capitalized but not well-capitalized cannot accept, renew or roll over brokered deposits except with a waiver from the FDIC and are subject to restrictions on the interest rates that can be paid on such deposits. Undercapitalized institutions may not accept, renew or roll over brokered deposits.
     The federal bank regulatory agencies are permitted or, in certain cases, required to take certain actions with respect to institutions falling within one of the three undercapitalized categories. Depending on the level of an institution’s capital, the agency’s corrective powers include, among other things:
  prohibiting the payment of principal and interest on subordinated debt;
 
  prohibiting the holding company from making distributions without prior regulatory approval;
 
  placing limits on asset growth and restrictions on activities;
 
  placing additional restrictions on transactions with affiliates;
 
  restricting the interest rate the institution may pay on deposits;
 
  prohibiting the institution from accepting deposits from correspondent banks; and
 
  in the most severe cases, appointing a conservator or receiver for the institution.
     A banking institution that is undercapitalized is required to submit a capital restoration plan, and such a plan will not be accepted unless, among other things, the banking institution’s holding company guarantees the plan up to a certain specified amount. Any such guarantee from a depository institution’s holding company is entitled to a priority of payment in bankruptcy.
     As of December 31, 2008,2009, FirstBank and FirstBank Florida werewas well-capitalized. A bank’s capital category, as determined by applying the prompt corrective action provisions of law, however, may not constitute an accurate representation of the overall financial condition or prospects of the Bank, and should be considered in conjunction with other available information regarding financial condition and results of operations.

2123


     Set forth below are the Corporation’s, FirstBank’s and FirstBank Florida’s capital ratios as of December 31, 2008,2009, based on Federal Reserve FDIC and OTSFDIC guidelines, respectively.
                            
 Banking Subsidiaries Well-Capitalized
 FirstBank Well-Capitalized First BanCorp First Bank Minimum
 First BanCorp FirstBank Florida Minimum
As of December 31, 2008
 
As of December 31, 2009
 
Total capital (Total capital to risk-weighted assets)  12.80%  12.23%  13.53%  10.00%  13.44%  12.87%  10.00%
Tier 1 capital ratio (Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets)  11.55%  10.98%  12.43%  6.00%  12.16%  11.70%  6.00%
Leverage ratio(1)  8.30%  7.90%  8.78%  5.00%  8.91%  8.53%  5.00%
 
(1) Tier 1 capital to average assets for First BanCorp and FirstBank and Tier 1 Capital to adjusted total assets for FirstBank Florida.assets.

2224


Activities and Investments
     The activities as “principal” and equity investments of FDIC-insured, state-chartered banks such as FirstBank are generally limited to those that are permissible for national banks. Under regulations dealing with equity investments, an insured state-chartered bank generally may not directly or indirectly acquire or retain any equity investments of a type, or in an amount, that is not permissible for a national bank.
Federal Home Loan Bank System
     FirstBank is a member of the Federal Home Loan Bank (FHLB) system. The FHLB system consists of twelve regional Federal Home Loan Banks governed and regulated by the Federal Housing Finance Agency. The Federal Home Loan Banks serve as reserve or credit facilities for member institutions within their assigned regions. They are funded primarily from proceeds derived from the sale of consolidated obligations of the FHLB system, and they make loans (advances) to members in accordance with policies and procedures established by the FHLB system and the board of directors of each regional FHLB.
     FirstBank is a member of the FHLB of New York (FHLB-NY) and as such is required to acquire and hold shares of capital stock in that FHLB for a certain amount, which is calculated in accordance with the requirements set forth in applicable laws and regulations. FirstBank is in compliance with the stock ownership requirements of the FHLB-NY. All loans, advances and other extensions of credit made by the FHLB-NY to FirstBank are secured by a portion of FirstBank’s mortgage loan portfolio, certain other investments and the capital stock of the FHLB-NY held by FirstBank.
   FirstBank Florida is a member of the FHLB of Atlanta and is subject to similar requirements as those of FirstBank.
Ownership and Control
     Because of FirstBank’s status as an FDIC-insured bank, as defined in the Bank Holding Company Act, First BanCorp, as the owner of FirstBank’s common stock, is subject to certain restrictions and disclosure obligations under various federal laws, including the Bank Holding Company Act and the Change in Bank Control Act (the “CBCA”). Regulations pursuant to the Bank Holding Company Act generally require prior Federal Reserve Board approval for an acquisition of control of an insured institution (as defined in the Act) or holding company thereof by any person (or persons acting in concert). Control is deemed to exist if, among other things, a person (or persons acting in concert) acquires more than 25% of any class of voting stock of an insured institution or holding company thereof. Under the CBCA, control is presumed to exist subject to rebuttal if a person (or persons acting in concert) acquires more than 10% of any class of voting stock and either (i) the corporation has registered securities under Section 12 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, or (ii) no person will own, control or hold the power to vote a greater percentage of that class of voting securities immediately after the transaction. The concept of acting in concert is very broad and also is subject to certain rebuttable presumptions, including among others, that relatives, business partners, management officials, affiliates and others are presumed to be acting in concert with each other and their businesses. The regulations of the FDIC and the OTS implementing the CBCA are generally similar to those described above.
     The Puerto Rico Banking Law requires the approval of the OCIF for changes in control of a Puerto Rico bank. See “Puerto Rico Banking Law.”
Cross-Guarantees
     Under the FDIA, a depository institution (which term includes both banks and savings associations), the deposits of which are insured by the FDIC, can be held liable for any loss incurred by, or reasonably expected to be incurred by, the FDIC in connection with (i) the default of a commonly controlled FDIC-insured depository institution or (ii) any assistance provided by the FDIC to any commonly controlled FDIC-insured depository institution “in danger of default.” “Default” is defined generally as the appointment of a conservator or a receiver and “in danger of default” is defined generally as the existence of certain conditions indicating that a default is likely to occur in the absence of regulatory assistance. In some circumstances (depending upon the amount of the loss or anticipated loss

23


suffered by the FDIC), cross-guarantee liability may result in the ultimate failure or insolvency of one or more insured depository institutions liable to the FDIC, and any obligations of that bank to its parent corporation are subordinated to the subsidiary bank’s cross-guarantee liability with respect to commonly controlled insured depository institutions. FirstBank and FirstBank Florida are currently the only FDIC-insured depository institutions controlled by the Corporation and therefore subject to this guaranty provision.
Standards for Safety and Soundness
     The FDIA, as amended by FDICIA and the Riegle Community Development and Regulatory Improvement Act of 1994, requires the FDIC and the other federal bank regulatory agencies to prescribe standards of safety and soundness, by regulations or guidelines, relating generally to operations and management, asset growth, asset quality, earnings, stock valuation, and compensation. The FDIC and the other federal bank regulatory agencies adopted, effective August 9, 1995, a set of guidelines prescribing safety and soundness standards pursuant to FDIA, as amended. The guidelines establish general standards relating to internal controls and information systems, internal audit systems, loan documentation, credit underwriting, interest rate exposure, asset growth and compensation, fees and benefits. In general, the guidelines require, among other things, appropriate systems and practices to identify and manage the risks and exposures specified in the guidelines. The guidelines prohibit excessive compensation as an unsafe and unsound practice and describe compensation as excessive when the

25


amounts paid are unreasonable or disproportionate to the services performed by an executive officer, employee, director or principal shareholder.
Brokered Deposits
     FDIC regulations adopted under the FDIA govern the receipt of brokered deposits by banks. Well-capitalized institutions are not subject to limitations on brokered deposits, while adequately-capitalized institutions are able to accept, renew or rollover brokered deposits only with a waiver from the FDIC and subject to certain restrictions on the interest paid on such deposits. Undercapitalized institutions are not permitted to accept brokered deposits. As of December 31, 2008,2009, FirstBank was a well-capitalized institution and was therefore not subject to these limitations on brokered deposits. The FDIC and other bank regulators may also exercise regulatory discretion to enforce limits on the acceptance of brokered deposits if they have safety and soundness concerns as to an over reliance on such funding.
Puerto Rico Banking Law
     As a commercial bank organized under the laws of the Commonwealth, FirstBank is subject to supervision, examination and regulation by the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico Commissioner of Financial Institutions (“Commissioner”) pursuant to the Puerto Rico Banking Law of 1933, as amended (the “Banking Law”). The Banking Law contains provisions governing the incorporation and organization, rights and responsibilities of directors, officers and stockholders as well as the corporate powers, lending limitations, capital requirements, investment requirements and other aspects of FirstBank and its affairs. In addition, the Commissioner is given extensive rule-making power and administrative discretion under the Banking Law.
     The Banking Law authorizes Puerto Rico commercial banks to conduct certain financial and related activities directly or through subsidiaries, including the leasing of personal property and the operation of a small loan business.
     The Banking Law requires every bank to maintain a legal reserve which shall not be less than twenty percent (20%) of its demand liabilities, except government deposits (federal, state and municipal) that are secured by actual collateral. The reserve is required to be composed of any of the following securities or combination thereof: (1) legal tender of the United States; (2) checks on banks or trust companies located in any part of Puerto Rico that are to be presented for collection during the day following the day on which they are received; (3) money deposited in other banks provided said deposits are authorized by the Commissioner, subject to immediate collection; (4) federal funds sold to any Federal Reserve Bank and securities purchased under agreements to resell executed by the bank with such funds that are subject to be repaid to the bank on or before the close of the next business day; and (5) any other asset that the Commissioner identifies from time to time.

2426


     The Banking Law permits Puerto Rico commercial banks to make loans to any one person, firm, partnership or corporation, up to an aggregate amount of fifteen percent (15%) of the sum of: (i) the bank’s paid-in capital; (ii) the bank’s reserve fund; (iii) 50% of the bank’s retained earnings; subject to certain limitations; and (iv) any other components that the Commissioner may determine from time to time. If such loans are secured by collateral worth at least twenty five percent (25%) more than the amount of the loan, the aggregate maximum amount may reach one third (33.33%) of the sum of the bank’s paid-in capital, reserve fund, 50% of retained earnings and such other components that the Commissioner may determine from time to time. There are no restrictions under the Banking Law on the amount of loans that are wholly secured by bonds, securities and other evidence of indebtedness of the Government of the United States, or of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, or by bonds, not in default, of municipalities or instrumentalities of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico. The revised classification of the mortgage-related transactions as secured commercial loans to local financial institutions includeddescribed in the Corporation’s restatement of previously issued financial statements (Form 10-K/A 2004), caused the mortgage-related transactions to be treated as two secured commercial loans in excess of the lending limitations imposed by the Banking Law. In this regard, FirstBank received a ruling from the Commissioner that results in FirstBank being considered in continued compliance with the lending limitations. The Puerto Rico Banking Law authorizes the Commissioner to determine other components which may be considered for purposes of establishing its lending limit, which components may lie outside the traditional elements mentioned in Section 17. After consideration of other components, the Commissioner authorized the Corporation to retain the secured loans to Doral and R&Gthe two financial institutions as it believed that these loans were secured by sufficient collateral to diversify, disperse and significantly diffuse the risks connected to such loans thereby satisfying the safety and soundness considerations mandated by Section 28 of the Banking Law. In July 2009, FirstBank entered into a transaction with one of the institutions to purchase $205 million in mortgage loans that served as collateral to the loan to this institution.
     The Banking Law prohibits Puerto Rico commercial banks from making loans secured by their own stock, and from purchasing their own stock, unless such purchase is made pursuant to a stock repurchase program approved by the Commissioner or is necessary to prevent losses because of a debt previously contracted in good faith. The stock purchased by the Puerto Rico commercial bank must be sold by the bank in a public or private sale within one year from the date of purchase.
     The Banking Law provides that no officers, directors, agents or employees of a Puerto Rico commercial bank may serve or discharge a position ofas an officer, director, agent or employee of another Puerto Rico commercial bank, financial corporation,savings and loan association, trust corporation, corporation engaged in granting mortgage loans or any other institution engaged in the money lending business in Puerto Rico. This prohibition is not applicable to the affiliates of a Puerto Rico commercial bank.
     The Banking Law requires that Puerto Rico commercial banks prepare each year a balance summary of their operations, and submit such balance summary for approval at a regular meeting of stockholders, together with an explanatory report thereon. The Banking Law also requires that at least ten percent (10%) of the yearly net income of a Puerto Rico commercial bank be credited annually to a reserve fund. This credit is required to be done every year until such reserve fund shall be equal to the total paid-in-capital of the bank.
     The Banking Law also provides that when the expenditures of a Puerto Rico commercial bank are greater than receipts, the excess of the expenditures over receipts shall be charged against the undistributed profits of the bank, and the balance, if any, shall be charged against the reserve fund, as a reduction thereof. If there is no reserve fund sufficient to cover such balance in whole or in part, the outstanding amount shall be charged against the capital account and no dividend shall be declared until said capital has been restored to its original amount and the reserve fund to twenty percent (20%) of the original capital.
     The Banking Law requires the prior approval of the Commissioner with respect to a transfer of capital stock of a bank that results in a change of control of the bank. Under the Banking Law, a change of control is presumed to occur if a person or a group of persons acting in concert, directly or indirectly, acquire more than 5% of the outstanding voting capital stock of the bank. The Commissioner has interpreted the restrictions of the Banking Law as applying to acquisitions of voting securities of entities controlling a bank, such as a bank holding company. Under the Banking Law, the determination of the Commissioner whether to approve a change of control filing is final and non-appealable.

2527


     The Finance Board, which is composed of the Commissioner, the Secretary of the Treasury, the Secretary of Commerce, the Secretary of Consumer Affairs, the President of the Economic Development Bank, the President of the Government Development Bank, and the President of the Planning Board, has the authority to regulate the maximum interest rates and finance charges that may be charged on loans to individuals and unincorporated businesses in Puerto Rico. The current regulations of the Finance Board provide that the applicable interest rate on loans to individuals and unincorporated businesses, including real estate development loans but excluding certain other personal and commercial loans secured by mortgages on real estate properties, is to be determined by free competition. Accordingly, the regulations do not set a maximum rate for charges on retail installment sales contracts, small loans, and for credit card purchases and set aside previous regulations which regulated these maximum finance charges. Furthermore, there is no maximum rate set for installment sales contracts involving motor vehicles, commercial, agricultural and industrial equipment, commercial electric appliances and insurance premiums.
International Banking Act of Puerto Rico (“IBE Act”)
     The business and operations of First BanCorp Overseas (“First BanCorp IBE”, the IBE division of First BanCorp), FirstBank International Branch (“FirstBank IBE”, the IBE division of FirstBank) and FirstBank Overseas Corporation (the IBE subsidiary of FirstBank) are subject to supervision and regulation by the Commissioner. Under the IBE Act, certain sales, encumbrances, assignments, mergers, exchanges or transfers of shares, interests or participation(s) in the capital of an international banking entity (an “IBE”) may not be initiated without the prior approval of the Commissioner. The IBE Act and the regulations issued thereunder by the Commissioner (the “IBE Regulations”) limit the business activities that may be carried out by an IBE. Such activities are limited in part to persons and assets located outside of Puerto Rico.
     Pursuant to the IBE Act and the IBE Regulations, each of First BanCorp IBE, FirstBank IBE and FirstBank Overseas Corporation must maintain books and records of all its transactions in the ordinary course of business. First BanCorp IBE, FirstBank IBE and FirstBank Overseas Corporation are also required thereunder to submit to the Commissioner quarterly and annual reports of their financial condition and results of operations, including annual audited financial statements.
     The IBE Act empowers the Commissioner to revoke or suspend, after notice and hearing, a license issued thereunder if, among other things, the IBE fails to comply with the IBE Act, the IBE Regulations or the terms of its license, or if the Commissioner finds that the business or affairs of the IBE are conducted in a manner that is not consistent with the public interest.
Puerto Rico Income Taxes
     Under the Puerto Rico Internal Revenue Code of 1994 (the “Code”), all companies are treated as separate taxable entities and are not entitled to file consolidated tax returns. The Corporation, and each of its subsidiaries are subject to a maximum statutory corporate income tax rate of 39% or an alternative minimum tax (“AMT”) on income earned from all sources, whichever is higher. The excess of AMT over regular income tax paid in any one year may be used to offset regular income tax in future years, subject to certain limitations. The Code provides for a dividend received deduction of 100% on dividends received from wholly owned subsidiaries subject to income taxation in Puerto Rico and 85% on dividends received from other taxable domestic corporations.
     On March 9, 2009, the Puerto Rico Government approved Act No. 7 (the “Act”), to stimulate Puerto Rico’s economy and to reduce the Puerto Rico Government’s fiscal deficit. The Act imposes a series of temporary and permanent measures, including the imposition of a 5% surtax over the total income tax determined, which is applicable to corporations, among others, whose combined income exceeds $100,000, effectively resulting in an increase in the maximum statutory tax rate from 39% to 40.95%. This temporary measure is effective for tax years that commenced after December 31, 2008 and before January 1, 2012.
In computing the interest expense deduction, the Corporation’s interest deduction will be reduced in the same proportion that the average exempt assets bear to the average total assets. Therefore, to the extent that the Corporation holds certain investments and loans that are exempt from Puerto Rico income taxation, part of its interest expense will be disallowed for tax purposes.

28


     The Corporation has maintained an effective tax rate lower than the maximum statutory tax rate of 39%40.95% during 20082009 mainly by investing in government obligations and mortgage-backed securities exempt from U.S. and Puerto Rico income tax combined with income from the IBE units of the Corporation and the Bank and the Bank’s subsidiary, FirstBank Overseas Corporation. The IBE, and FirstBank Overseas Corporation were created under the IBE Act, which provides for Puerto Rico tax exemption on net income derived by IBEs operating in Puerto Rico.Rico (except for year tax years commenced after December 31, 2008 and before January 1, 2012, in which all IBE’s are subject to the special 5% tax on their net income not otherwise subject to tax pursuant to the PR Code, as provided by Act. No. 7). Pursuant to the provisions of Act No. 13 of January 8, 2004, the IBE Act was amended to impose income tax at regular rates on an IBE that operates as a unit of a bank, to the extent that the IBE net income exceeds 25%20% of the bank’s total net taxable income (including net income generated by the IBE unit) for taxable years that commenced

26


on July 1, 2005, and thereafter. These amendments apply only to IBEs that operate as units of a bank; they do not impose income tax on an IBE that operates as a subsidiary of a bank.
United States Income Taxes
     The Corporation is also subject to federal income tax on its income from sources within the United States and on any item of income that is, or is considered to be, effectively connected with the active conduct of a trade or business within the United States. The U.S. Internal Revenue Code provides for tax exemption of portfolio interest received by a foreign corporation from sources within the United States; therefore, the Corporation is not subject to federal income tax on certain U.S. investments which qualify under the term “portfolio interest”.
Insurance Operations Regulation
     FirstBank Insurance Agency is registered as an insurance agency with the Insurance Commissioner of Puerto Rico and is subject to regulations issued by the Insurance Commissioner relating to, among other things, licensing of employees, sales, solicitation and advertising practices, and by the FED as to certain consumer protection provisions mandated by the GLB Act and its implementing regulations.
Community Reinvestment Act
     Under the Community Reinvestment Act (“CRA”), federally insured banks have a continuing and affirmative obligation to meet the credit needs of their entire community, including low- and moderate-income residents, consistent with their safe and sound operation. The CRA does not establish specific lending requirements or programs for financial institutions nor does it limit an institution’s discretion to develop the type of products and services that it believes are best suited to its particular community, consistent with the CRA. The CRA requires the federal supervisory agencies, as part of theirthe general examination of supervised banks, to assess the bank’s record of meeting the credit needs of its community, assign a performance rating, and take such record and rating into account in their evaluation of certain applications by such bank. The CRA also requires all institutions to make public disclosure of their CRA ratings. FirstBank and FirstBank Florida received a “satisfactory” CRA rating in their most recent examinations by the FDIC and the OTS, respectively.FDIC.
Mortgage Banking Operations
     FirstBank is subject to the rules and regulations of the FHA, VA, FNMA, FHLMC, HUD and GNMA with respect to originating, processing, selling and servicing mortgage loans and the issuance and sale of mortgage-backed securities. Those rules and regulations, among other things, prohibit discrimination and establish underwriting guidelines that include provisions for inspections and appraisals, require credit reports on prospective borrowers and fix maximum loan amounts, and with respect to VA loans, fix maximum interest rates. Moreover, lenders such as FirstBank are required annually to submit to FHA, VA, FNMA, FHLMC, GNMA and HUD audited financial statements, and each regulatory entity has its own financial requirements. FirstBank’s affairs are also subject to supervision and examination by FHA, VA, FNMA, FHLMC, GNMA and HUD at all times to assure compliance with the applicable regulations, policies and procedures. Mortgage origination activities are subject to, among others, the Equal Credit Opportunity Act, Federal Truth-in-Lending Act, and the Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act and the regulations promulgated thereunder which, among other things, prohibit discrimination and require the disclosure of certain basic information to mortgagors concerning credit terms and settlement costs. FirstBank is licensed by the Commissioner under the Puerto Rico Mortgage Banking Law, and as such is subject to

29


regulation by the Commissioner, with respect to, among other things, licensing requirements and establishment of maximum origination fees on certain types of mortgage loan products.
     Section 5 of the Puerto Rico Mortgage Banking Law requires the prior approval of the Commissioner for the acquisition of control of any mortgage banking institution licensed under such law. For purposes of the Puerto Rico Mortgage Banking Law, the term “control” means the power to direct or influence decisively, directly or indirectly, the management or policies of a mortgage banking institution. The Puerto Rico Mortgage Banking Law provides that a transaction that results in the holding of less than 10% of the outstanding voting securities of a mortgage banking institution shall not be considered a change in control.

27


Item 1A.Risk Factors
     Certain risk factors that may affect the Corporation’s future results of operations are discussed below.
Risks RelatingRISK RELATING TO THE CORPORATION’S BUSINESS
Credit quality, which is continuing to deteriorate, may result in future additional losses.
     The quality of First BanCorp’s credits has continued to be under pressure as a result of continued recessionary conditions in Puerto Rico and the state of Florida that have led to, among other things, higher unemployment levels, much lower absorption rates for new residential construction projects and further declines in property values. The Corporation’s business depends on the creditworthiness of its customers and counterparties and the value of the assets securing its loans or underlying our investments. When the credit quality of the customer base materially decreases or the risk profile of a market, industry or group of customers changes materially, the Corporation’s business, financial condition, allowance levels, asset impairments, liquidity, capital and results of operations are adversely affected.
     While the Corporation has substantially increased our allowance for loan and lease losses in 2009, there is no certainty that it will be sufficient to cover future credit losses in the portfolio because of continued adverse changes in the economy, market conditions or events negatively affecting specific customers, industries or markets both in Puerto Rico and Florida. The Corporation periodically review the allowance for loan and lease losses for adequacy considering economic conditions and trends, collateral values and credit quality indicators, including charge-off experience and levels of past due loans and non-performing assets. First BanCorp’s future results may be materially and adversely affected by worsening defaults and severity rates related to the underlying collateral.
The Corporation may have more credit risk and higher credit losses due to its construction loan portfolio.
     The Corporation has a significant construction loan portfolio, in the amount of $1.49 billion as of December 31, 2009, mostly secured by commercial and residential real estate properties. Due to their nature, these loans entail a higher credit risk than consumer and residential mortgage loans, since they are larger in size, concentrate more risk in a single borrower and are generally more sensitive to economic downturns. Rapidly changing collateral values, general economic conditions and numerous other factors continue to create volatility in the housing markets and have increased the possibility that additional losses may have to be recognized with respect to the Corporation’s Businesscurrent nonperforming assets. Furthermore, given the current slowdown in the real estate market, the properties securing these loans may be difficult to dispose of if they are foreclosed.
Fluctuations in interest ratesThe Corporation is subject to default risk on loans, which may impact the Corporation’s results of operationsadversely affect its results.
     Significant variancesThe Corporation is subject to the risk of loss from loan defaults and foreclosures with respect to the loans it originates. The Corporation establishes a provision for loan losses, which leads to reductions in interest rates are the primary market risk affecting the Corporation. Interest rates are highly sensitiveits income from operations, in order to many factors, such as government monetary policies and domestic and international economic and political conditions that are beyond the controlmaintain its allowance for inherent loan losses at a level which its management deems to be appropriate based upon an assessment of the Corporation.quality of the loan portfolio. Although the Corporation’s management utilizes its best judgment in providing for loan losses, there can be no assurance that management has accurately estimated the level of inherent loan losses or that the Corporation will not have to increase its provision for loan losses in the future as a result of future increases in non-performing loans or for other reasons beyond its control.

30


     Any such increases in the Corporation’s provision for loan losses or any loan losses in excess of its provision for loan losses would have an adverse effect on the Corporation’s future financial condition and results of operations. Given the difficulties facing some of the Corporation’s largest borrowers, the Corporation can give no assurance that these borrowers will continue to repay their loans on a timely basis or that the Corporation will continue to be able to accurately assess any risk of loss from the loans to these financial institutions.
Changes in collateral valuation for properties located in stagnant or distressed economies may require increased reserves.
     Substantially all of the loan portfolio of the Corporation is located within the boundaries of the U.S. economy. Whether the collateral is located in Puerto Rico, the U.S. Virgin Islands, British Virgin Islands or the U.S. mainland, the performance of the Corporation’s loan portfolio and the collateral value backing the transactions are dependent upon the performance of and conditions within each specific real estate market. Recent economic reports related to the real estate market in Puerto Rico indicate that certain pockets of the real estate market are subject to readjustments in value driven not by demand but more by the purchasing power of the consumers and general economic conditions. In South Florida, we have been seeing the negative impact associated with low absorption rates and property value adjustments due to overbuilding. A significant decline in collateral valuations for collateral dependent loans may require increases in the Corporation’s specific provision for loan losses and an increase in the general valuation allowance. Any such increase would have an adverse effect on the Corporation’s future financial condition and results of operations.
Worsening in the financial condition of critical counterparties may result in higher losses than expected.
     The financial stability of several counterparties is critical for their continued financial performance on covenants that require the repurchase of loans, posting of collateral to reduce our credit exposure or replacement of delinquent loans. Many of these transactions expose the Corporation to credit risk in the event of a default by one of the Corporation’s counterparties. Any such losses could adversely affect the Corporation’s business, financial condition and results of operations.
Interest rate shifts may reduce net interest incomeincome.
     Shifts in short-term interest rates may reduce net interest income, which is the principal component of the Corporation’s earnings. Net interest income is the difference between the amount received by the Corporation on its interest-earning assets and the interest paid by the Corporation on its interest-bearing liabilities. When interest rates rise, the Corporation must pay more in interest on its liabilities while the interest earned on its assets does not rise as quickly. This may cause the Corporation’s profits to decrease. This adverse impact on earnings is greater when the slope of the yield curve flattens, that is, when short-term interest rates increase more than long-term rates.
Increases in interest rates may reduce the value of holdings of securitiessecurities.
     Fixed-rate securities acquired by the Corporation are generally subject to decreases in market value when interest rates rise, which may require recognition of a loss (e.g., the identification of other-than-temporary impairment on its available-for-saleavailable for sale or held-to-maturityheld to maturity investments portfolio), thereby potentiallyadversely affecting adversely the results of operations. Market relatedMarket-related reductions in value also affect the capabilities of financing these securities.
Increases in interest rates may reduce demand for mortgage and other loansloans.
     Higher interest rates increase the cost of mortgage and other loans to consumers and businesses and may reduce demand for such loans, which may negatively impact the Corporation’s profits by reducing the amount of loan origination income.
Accelerated prepayments may adversely affect net interest income.
     Net interest income of future periods may be affected by the acceleration in prepayments of mortgage-backed securities. Acceleration in the prepayments of mortgage-backed securities would lower yields on securities purchased at a premium, as the amortization of premiums paid upon acquisition of these securities would accelerate.

31


Conversely, acceleration in the prepayments of mortgage-backed securities would increase yields on securities purchased at a discount, as the amortization of the discount would accelerate.
     Also, net interest income in future periods might be affected by the Corporation’s investment in callable securities. Approximately $945 million of U.S. Agency debentures with an average yield of 5.82% were called during 2009. The Corporation re-invested the proceeds of the securities calls in callable Agency debentures of approximately 2.7 years average final maturity with a weighted average yield to maturity of 2.12%.
Decreases in interest rates may increase the pre-payment of certain assets
probability embedded call options in investment securities are exercised. Future net interest income could be affected by the Corporation’s holding of callable securities. The recent drop in the long termlong-term interest rates has the effect of increasing the probability of the exercise of embedded calls in the approximately $945 million U.S. Agency securities portfolio of approximately $1.1 billion that if substituted with new lower-yieldinglower-yield investments may negatively impact the Corporation’s interest income.
     Net interest income of future periods may also be affected by the acceleration in pre-payments of mortgage-backed securities and loan portfolios. Acceleration in the pre-payments of mortgage-backed securities and loan portfolios implies that the replacement of such assets would be at lower rates and therefore threatening the net interest margin to the extent that the related funding of those assets does not re-price by a similar rate of change.

28


Decreases in interest rates may reduce net interest income due to the current unprecedented re-pricing mismatch of assets and liabilities tied to short-term interest rates, (Basis Risk)which is referred to as basis risk.
     Basis risk occurs when market rates for different financial instruments or the indices used to price assets and liabilities, change at different times or by different amounts. RecentThe liquidity pressures affecting the U.S. financial markets havecrisis that erupted in late 2008, and that slowly began to subside during 2009 caused a wider than historicalnormal spread between brokered CDsCD costs and LIBOR rates for similar terms. This in turn, is preventinghas prevented the Corporation from capturing the full benefit of recent drops in interest rates as the Corporation’s loan portfolio, funded by LIBOR-based brokered CDs, continuescontinue to maintain the same historical spread to short-term LIBOR rates.rates, while the spread on brokered CD’s widened. To the extent that such pressures fail to subside in the near future, the margin between the Corporation’s LIBOR-based assets and LIBOR-based liabilities may compress and adversely affect net interest income.
If all or a significant portion of the unrealized losses in our investment securities portfolio on our consolidated balance sheet were determined to be other-than-temporarily impaired, we would recognize a material charge to our earnings and our capital ratios would be adversely affected.
     As of December 31, 2009, the Corporation recognized $1.7 million in other than temporary impairments. To the extent that any portion of the unrealized losses in its investment securities portfolio is determined to be other than temporary, and the loss is related to credit factors, the Corporation recognizes a charge to earnings in the quarter during which such determination is made and capital ratios could be adversely affected. If any such charge is significant, a rating agency might downgrade the Corporation’s credit rating or put it on credit watch. Even if the Corporation does not determine that the unrealized losses associated with this portfolio requires an impairment charge, increases in these unrealized losses adversely affect the tangible common equity ratio, which may adversely affect credit rating agency and investor sentiment towards the Corporation. This negative perception also may adversely affect the Corporation’s ability to access the capital markets or might increase the cost of capital.
     As of December 31, 2009, the Corporation recognized other-than-temporary impairment on its private label MBS. Valuation and other-than-temporary impairment determinations will continue to be affected by external market factors including default rates, severity rates and macro-economic factors.
Downgrades toin the Corporation’s credit ratings could potentiallyfurther increase the cost of borrowing fundsfunds.
     Both, the Corporation and the Bank suffered credit rating downgrades in 2009. Fitch Ratings Ltd. (“Fitch”) has ratedcurrently rates the Corporation’s long-term senior debt a rating of BB, which is two“B-,” six notches underbelow investment grade. Standard and Poors rates the Corporation B, or five notches below investment grade. Moody’s Investor Service (“Moody’s”Moodys”) has ratedrates FirstBank’s long-term senior debt at Ba1,“B1,” and Standard & Poor’s (“S&P”) has ratedrates it at BB+, one notch under their definition of investment grade. However,“B”. The three rating agencies’ outlooks on FirstBank and the Corporation’s credit ratings outlook for Moody’s and S&P are stable while Fitch’s is negative. The Corporation does not have any outstanding debt or derivative agreements that would be affected by a credit downgrade. The Corporation’s liquidity is contingent upon its ability to obtain external sources of funding to finance its operations. Any future downgrades in credit ratings can hindercould put additional pressure on the Corporation’s access to external funding and/or cause external funding to be more expensive, which could in turn adversely affect the results of operations. Also, any changeChanges in credit ratings may also

32


affect the fair value of certain liabilities and unsecured derivatives, measured at fair value in the financial statements, for which the Corporation’s own credit risk is an element considered in the fair value determination.
     These debt and financial strength ratings are current opinions of the rating agencies. As such, they may be changed, suspended or withdrawn at any time by the rating agencies as a result of changes in, or unavailability of, information or based on other circumstances.
Unforeseen disruptions inThe Corporation’s funding is significantly dependent on brokered deposits.
     The Corporation’s funding sources include core deposits, brokered deposits, borrowings from the brokered CDs market could compromiseFederal Home Loan Bank, borrowings from the Corporation’s liquidity positionFederal Reserve Bank and repurchase agreements with several counterparties.
     A large portion of the Corporation’s funding is retail brokered CDs issued by FirstBank. TotalAs of December 31, 2009, the Corporation had $7.6 billion in brokered CDs increaseddeposits outstanding, representing approximately 60% of our total deposits, and a reduction from $7.2$8.4 billion at year end 20072008. The Corporation issues brokered CDs to, $8.4among other things, pay operating expenses, maintain our lending activities, replace certain maturing liabilities, and to control interest rate risk.
     FDIC regulations govern the issuance of brokered deposit instruments by banks. Well-capitalized institutions are not subject to limitations on brokered deposits, while adequately-capitalized institutions are able to accept, renew or rollover brokered deposits only with a waiver from the FDIC and subject to certain restrictions on the interest paid on such deposits. Undercapitalized institutions are not permitted to accept brokered deposits. As of December 31, 2009, the Corporation was a well-capitalized institution and was therefore not subject to these limitations on brokered deposits. If the Corporation became subject to such restrictions on its brokered deposits, the availability of such deposits would be limited and could, in turn, adversely affect the results of operations and the liquidity of the Corporation. The FDIC and other bank regulators may also exercise regulatory discretion to enforce limits on the acceptance of brokered deposits if they have safety and soundness concerns as to an over reliance on such funding.
     The use of brokered CDs has been particularly important for the growth of the Corporation. The Corporation encounters intense competition in attracting and retaining regular retail deposits in Puerto Rico. The brokered CDs market is very competitive and liquid, and the Corporation has been able to obtain substantial amounts of funding in short periods of time. This strategy enhances the Corporation’s liquidity position, since the brokered CDs are insured by the FDIC up to regulatory limits and can be obtained faster compared to regular retail deposits. Demand for brokered CDs has recently increased as a result of the move by investors from riskier investments, such as equities, to federally guaranteed instruments such as brokered CDs and the recent increase in FDIC deposit insurance from $100,000 to $250,000. For the year ended December 31, 2009, the Corporation issued $8.3 billion in brokered CDs (including rollover of short-term broker CDs and replacement of brokered CDs called) compared to $9.8 billion for the 2008 year.
     The average term to maturity of the retail brokered CDs outstanding as of December 31, 2008.2009 was approximately 1.08 years. Approximately 1.55% of the principal value of these certificates is callable at the Corporation’s option.
     Another source of funding is Advances from the Discount Window of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York. Currently, the Corporation has $800 million of borrowings outstanding with the Federal Reserve Bank. As part of the mechanisms to ease the liquidity crisis, during 2009 the Federal Reserve Bank encouraged banks to utilize the Discount Window as a source of funding. With the market conditions improving, the Federal Reserve announced in early 2010 its intention of withdrawing part of the economic stimulus measures, including replacing restrictions on the use of Discount Window borrowings, thereby returning to its function of lender of last resort.
The Corporation’s funding sources may prove insufficient to replace deposits and support future growth.
     The Corporation’s banking subsidiary relies on customer deposits, brokered deposits and advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank (“FHLB”) to fund its operations. Although the Bank has historically been able to replace maturing deposits and advances if desired, no assurance can be given that it would be able to replace these funds in the future if the Corporation’s financial condition or general market conditions were to change. The Corporation’s

2933


Should an unforeseen disruptionfinancial flexibility will be severely constrained if the Bank is unable to maintain access to funding or if adequate financing is not available to accommodate future growth at acceptable interest rates. Finally, if the Corporation is required to rely more heavily on more expensive funding sources to support future growth, revenues may not increase proportionately to cover costs. In this case, profitability would be adversely affected. Although the Corporation considers such sources of funds adequate for its liquidity needs, the Corporation may seek additional debt financing in the brokered CDs market, stemming from factors such as legal, regulatoryfuture to achieve its long-term business objectives. There can be no assurance additional borrowings, if sought, would be available to the Corporation or, financial risks, compromise the Corporation’s ability to continue funding its operations and/on what terms. If additional financing sources are unavailable or meet its obligations, itare not available on reasonable terms, growth and future prospects could be obligated to liquidate assets in a relatively short period of time to cover its liquidity needs.adversely affected.
Adverse credit market conditions may affect the Corporation’s ability to meet liquidity needsneeds.
     The credit markets have recently been experiencing extreme volatility and disruption. In the second half of 2008, the volatility and disruptions have reached unprecedented levels. In some cases, the markets have exerted downward pressures on availability of liquidity and credit capacity for certain issuers.
     The Corporation needs liquidity to, among other things, pay its operating expenses, interest on its debt and dividends on its capital stock, maintain its lending activities and replace certain maturing liabilities. Without sufficient liquidity, the Corporation may be forced to curtail its operations. The availability of additional financing will depend on a variety of factors such as market conditions, the general availability of credit and the Corporation’s credit ratings and credit capacity. The Corporation’s financial condition and cash flows could be materially affected by continued disruptions in financial markets.
Our controls and procedures may fail or be circumvented, our risk management policies and procedures may be inadequate, and operational risk could adversely affect our consolidated results of operations.
The Corporation may fail to identify and manage risks related to a variety of aspects of its business, including, but not limited to, operational risk, interest-rate risk, trading risk, fiduciary risk, legal and compliance risk, liquidity risk and credit risk. The Corporation has adopted various controls, procedures, policies and systems to monitor and manage risk. While the Corporation currently believes that its risk management process is effective, the Corporation cannot provide assurance that those controls, procedures, policies and systems will always be adequate to identify and manage the risks in the various businesses. In addition, the Corporation’s businesses and the markets in which it operates are continuously evolving. The Corporation may fail to fully understand the implications of changes in its businesses or the financial markets and fail to adequately or timely enhance its risk framework to address those changes. If the Corporation’s risk framework is ineffective, either because it fails to keep pace with changes in the financial markets or its businesses or for other reasons, the Corporation could incur losses, suffer reputational damage or find itself out of compliance with applicable regulatory mandates or expectations.
     The Corporation may also be subject to default risk on loans,disruptions from external events that are wholly or partially beyond its control, which could cause delays or disruptions to operational functions, including information processing and financial market settlement functions. In addition, our customers, vendors and counterparties could suffer from such events. Should these events affect us, or the customers, vendors or counterparties with which we conduct business, our consolidated results of operations could be negatively affected. When we record balance sheet reserves for probable loss contingencies related to operational losses, we may be unable to accurately estimate our potential exposure, and any reserves we establish to cover operational losses may not be sufficient to cover our actual financial exposure, which may have a material impact on our consolidated results of operations or financial condition for the periods in which we recognize the losses.
Competition for our employees is intense, and we may not be able to attract and retain the highly skilled people we need to support our business.
     Our success depends, in large part, on our ability to attract and/or retain key people. Competition for the best people in most activities in which we engage can be intense, and we may not be able to hire people or retain them, particularly in light of uncertainty concerning evolving compensation restrictions applicable to banks but not applicable to other financial services firms. The unexpected loss of services of one or more of our key personnel could adversely affect its resultsour business because the loss of their skills, knowledge of our markets, and years of industry experience and, in some cases, because of the difficulty of promptly finding qualified replacement personnel. Similarly, the loss of key employees, either individually or as a group, can adversely affect our customers’ perception of our ability to continue to manage certain types of investment management mandates.

34


Banking regulators could take adverse action against the Corporation.
     The Corporation is subject to supervision and regulation by the FED. The Corporation is a bank holding company that qualifies as a financial holding corporation. As such, the Corporation is permitted to engage in a broader spectrum of activities than those permitted to bank holding companies that are not financial holding companies. To continue to qualify as a financial holding corporation, each of the Corporation’s banking subsidiaries must continue to qualify as “well-capitalized” and “well-managed.” As of December 31, 2009, the Corporation and the Bank continue to satisfy all applicable capital guidelines. This, however, does not prevent banking regulators from taking adverse actions against the Corporation if they should conclude that such actions are warranted. If the Corporation were not to continue to qualify as a financial holding corporation, it might be required to discontinue certain activities and may be prohibited from engaging in new activities without prior regulatory approval. The Bank is subject to supervision and regulation by the FDIC, which conducts annual inspections, and, in Puerto Rico the OCIF. The primary regulators of the Corporation and the Bank have significant discretion and power to initiate enforcement actions for violations of laws and regulations and unsafe or unsound practices in the performance of their supervisory and enforcement duties and may do so even if the Corporation and the Bank continue to satisfy all capital requirements. Adverse action against the Corporation and/or the Bank by their primary regulators may affect their businesses.
Further increases in the FDIC deposit insurance premium may have a significant financial impact on the Corporation.
     The FDIC insures deposits at FDIC insured financial institutions up to certain limits. The FDIC charges insured financial institutions premiums to maintain the Deposit Insurance Fund (the “DIF”). Current economic conditions have resulted in higher bank failures and expectations of future bank failures. In the event of a bank failure, the FDIC takes control of a failed bank and ensures payment of deposits up to insured limits (which have recently been increased) using the resources of the DIF. The FDIC is required by law to maintain adequate funding of the DIF, and the FDIC may increase premium assessments to maintain such funding.
     On February 27, 2009, the FDIC determined that it would assess higher rates for institutions that relied significantly on secured liabilities or on brokered deposits but, for well-managed and well-capitalized banks, only when accompanied by rapid asset growth. On May 22, 2009, the FDIC adopted a final rule imposing a 5 basis-point special assessment on each insured depository institution’s assets minus Tier 1 capital as of June 30, 2009. On November 12, 2009, the FDIC adopted a final rule imposing a 13-quarter prepayment of FDIC premiums due on December 30, 2009. Although FirstBank obtained a waiver from the FDIC to make such prepayment, the FDIC may further increase our premiums or impose additional assessments or prepayment requirements on the Corporation in the future.
The Corporation may not be able to recover all assets pledged to Lehman Brothers Special Financing, Inc.
     Lehman Brothers Special Financing, Inc. (“Lehman”) was the counterparty to the Corporation on certain interest rate swap agreements. During the third quarter of 2008, Lehman failed to pay the scheduled net cash settlement due to the Corporation, which constitutes an event of default under those interest rate swap agreements. The Corporation terminated all interest rate swaps with Lehman and replaced them with other counterparties under similar terms and conditions. In connection with the unpaid net cash settlement due as of December 31, 2009 under the swap agreements, the Corporation has an unsecured counterparty exposure with Lehman, which filed for bankruptcy on October 3, 2008, of approximately $1.4 million. This exposure was reserved in the third quarter of 2008. The Corporation had pledged collateral of $63.6 million with Lehman to guarantee its performance under the swap agreements in the event payment thereunder was required. The book value of pledged securities with Lehman as of December 31, 2009 amounted to approximately $64.5 million.
     The Corporation believes that the securities pledged as collateral should not be part of the Lehman bankruptcy estate given that the posted collateral constituted a performance guarantee under the swap agreements and was not part of a financing agreement, and that ownership of the securities was never transferred to Lehman. Upon termination of the interest rate swap agreements Lehman’s obligation was to return the collateral to the Corporation. During the fourth quarter of 2009, the Corporation discovered that Lehman Brothers, Inc., acting as agent of

35


Lehman, had deposited the securities in a custodial account at JP Morgan/Chase, and that, shortly before the filing of the Lehman bankruptcy proceedings, it had provided instructions to have most of the securities transferred to Barclay’s Capital in New York. After Barclay’s refusal to turn over the securities, the Corporation, during the month of December, 2009, filed a lawsuit against Barclay’s Capital in federal court in New York demanding the return of the securities. While the Corporation believes it has valid reasons to support its claim for the return of the securities, there are no assurances that it will ultimately succeed in its litigation against Barclay’s Capital to recover all or a substantial portion of the securities.
     Additionally, the Corporation continues to pursue its claim filed in January 2009 in the proceedings under the Securities Protection Act with regard to Lehman Brothers Incorporated in Bankruptcy Court, Southern District of New York. The Corporation can provide no assurances that it will be successful in recovering all or substantial portion of the securities through these proceedings.
Our businesses may be adversely affected by litigation.
     From time to time, our customers, or the government on their behalf, may make claims and take legal action relating to our performance of fiduciary or contractual responsibilities. We may also face employment lawsuits or other legal claims. In any such claims or actions, demands for substantial monetary damages may be asserted against us resulting in financial liability or having an adverse effect on our reputation among investors or on customer demand for our products and services. We may be unable to accurately estimate our exposure to litigation risk when we record balance sheet reserves for probable loss contingencies. As a result, any reserves we establish to cover any settlements or judgments may not be sufficient to cover our actual financial exposure, which may have a material impact on our consolidated results of loss from loan defaultsoperations or financial condition.
     In the ordinary course of our business, we are also subject to various regulatory, governmental and foreclosureslaw enforcement inquiries, investigations and subpoenas. These may be directed generally to participants in the businesses in which we are involved or may be specifically directed at us. In regulatory enforcement matters, claims for disgorgement, the imposition of penalties and the imposition of other remedial sanctions are possible.
     In view of the inherent difficulty of predicting the outcome of legal actions and regulatory matters, we cannot provide assurance as to the outcome of any pending matter or, if determined adversely against us, the costs associated with any such matter, particularly where the claimant seeks very large or indeterminate damages or where the matter presents novel legal theories, involves a large number of parties or is at a preliminary stage. The resolution of certain pending legal actions or regulatory matters, if unfavorable, could have a material adverse effect on our consolidated results of operations for the quarter in which such actions or matters are resolved or a reserve is established.
     Further information with respect to the loans it originates. The Corporation establishes a provision for loan losses, which leads to reductionsforegoing and our other ongoing litigation matters is provided in its income from operations, in order to maintain its allowance for inherent loan losses at a level which its management deems toLegal Proceedings included under Item 3 herein.
Our businesses may be appropriate basednegatively affected by adverse publicity or other reputational harm.
     Our relationships with many of our customers are predicated upon an assessment of the quality of its loan portfolio. Although the Corporation’s management utilizes its best judgment in providing for loan losses, there can be no assurance that management has accurately estimated the level of inherent loan losses or that the Corporation will not have to increase its provision for loan losses in the futureour reputation as a resultfiduciary and a service provider that adheres to the highest standards of future increasesethics, service quality and regulatory compliance. Adverse publicity, regulatory actions, litigation, operational failures, the failure to meet customer expectations and other issues with respect to one or more of our businesses could materially and adversely affect our reputation, ability to attract and retain customers or sources of funding for the same or other businesses. Preserving and enhancing our reputation also depends on maintaining systems and procedures that address known risks and regulatory requirements, as well as our ability to identify and mitigate additional risks that arise due to changes in non performing loans or for other reasons beyond its control. Any such increasesour businesses, the market places in which we operate, the Corporation’s provision for loan losses orregulatory environment and customer expectations. If any loan losses in excess of its provision for loan losses would have anthese developments has a material adverse effect on the Corporation’s future financial condition and results of operations. Given the difficulties on the Corporation’s largest borrowers, Doral and R&G Financial, the Corporation can give no assurance that these borrowersour reputation, our business will continue to repay their secured loans on a timely basis or that the Corporation will continue to be able to accurately assess any risk of loss from the loans to these financial institutions.
Changes in collateral valuation for properties located in stagnant or distressed economies may require increased reserves
     Substantially all of the loan portfolio of the Corporation is located within the boundaries of the U.S. economy. Whether the collateral is located in Puerto Rico, the U.S. Virgin Islands, British Virgin Islands or the U.S. mainland, the performance of the Corporation’s loan portfolio and the collateral value backing the transactions are dependent upon the performance of and conditions within each specific area’s real estate market. Recent economic reports related to the real estate market in Puerto Rico indicate that certain pockets of the real estate market are subject to readjustments in value driven not by demand but more by the purchasing power of the consumers and general economic conditions. In South Florida we are seeing the negative impact associated with low absorption rates and property value adjustments due to overbuilding. A significant decline in collateral valuations for collateral dependent loans may require increases in the Corporation’s specific provision for loan losses and an increase in the general valuation allowance. Any such increase would have an adverse effect on the Corporation’s future financial condition and results of operations.suffer.

3036


The Corporation’s business concentrationChanges in Puerto Rico imposes risks
     The Corporation conducts its operations in a geographically concentrated area, as its main market is Puerto Rico. This imposes risks from lack of diversification inaccounting standards issued by the geographical portfolio. The Corporation’s financial condition and results of operations are highly dependent on the economic conditions of Puerto Rico, where adverse politicalFinancial Accounting Standards Board or economic developments, natural disasters, etc., could affect the volume of loan originations, increase the level of nonperforming assets, increase the rate of foreclosure losses on loans, and reduce the value of the Corporation’s loans and loan servicing portfolio.
First BanCorp’s credit quality may be adversely affected by Puerto Rico’s current economic condition
     Beginning in March 2006 and continuing through 2008, a number of key economic indicators showed that the economy of Puerto Rico has been under a recession during that period of time.
     Construction remained weak during 2008, as the combination of rising interest rates, the Commonwealth’s fiscal situation and decreasing public investment in construction projects affected the sector. During the period from January to December 2008, cement sales, an indicator of construction activity, declined by 16% as compared to 2007. As of September 2008, exports decreased by 11.7%, while imports decreased by 8.9%, a negative trade, which continues since the first negative trade balance of the last decade was registered in November 2006. Tourism activity has also declined during 2008. Total hotel registrations for January to October 2008 declined 2% as compared to the same period for 2007. During 2008 new vehicle sales decreased by 13%, the lowest since 1993. In December 2008, unemployment in Puerto Rico reached 13.1% up 2.6% compared with the same period in 2007.
     On February 9, 2009 the Puerto Rico Planning Board announced the release of Puerto Rico’s macroeconomic data for fiscal year 2008, as well as projected figures for fiscal years 2009 and 2010. The Planning Board’s revision for fiscal year 2008 shows the growth of the Puerto Rico economy slowing down by 2.5%. The Planning Board’s projections point toward an economy that will have contracted by 3.4% during the current fiscal year of 2009 (ending on June 30, 2009) and that will suffer an estimated reduction of 2.0% during fiscal year 2010. In general, the Puerto Rico economy continued its trend of decreasing growth, primarily due to weaker manufacturing, softer consumption and decreased government investment in construction.
     The above economic concerns and uncertainty in the private and public sectors may also have an adverse effect on the credit quality of the Corporation’s loan portfolios, as delinquency rates are expected to increase in the short-term, until the economy stabilizes. Also, a potential reduction in consumer spending may also impact growth in other interest and non-interest revenue sources of the Corporation.
Rating downgrades on the Government of Puerto Rico’s debt obligations may affect the Corporation’s credit exposure
     Even though Puerto Rico’s economy is closely integrated to that of the U.S. mainland and its government and many of its instrumentalities are investment-grade rated borrowers in the U.S. capital markets, the current fiscal situation of the Government of Puerto Rico has led nationally recognized rating agencies to downgrade its debt obligations in the past.
     In May 2006, Moody’s Investors Service downgraded the Government’s general obligation bond rating to Baa3 from Baa2, and put the credit on “watch list” for possible further downgrades. The Commonwealth’s appropriation bonds and some of the subordinated revenue bonds were also downgraded by one notch and are now rated below investment grade at Ba1. Moody’s commented that its action reflected the Government’s strained financial condition, the ongoing political conflict and lack of agreement regarding the measures necessary to end the government’s multi-year trend of financial deterioration. In November 2007, Moody’s Investors Services removed the negative outlook and changed to stable as a reflection of measures the Commonwealth took to reduce the budget deficits such as implementation of the Fiscal Reform and Sales and use Tax.
     In May 2007, S&P downgraded their credit ratings on the Commonwealth General Obligation debt, and removed the negative outlook and changed to stable. This action reflected factors such as the Government’s ability to implement meaningful steps to curb operating expenditures, improve managerial and budgetary controls, high debt

31


levels, chronic deficits, and eliminate the government’s reliance on operating budget loans from the Government Development Bank for Puerto Rico. At the present both rating agencies maintain the stable outlook for the Puerto Rico general obligation bonds.
     It is uncertain how the financial markets may react to any potential future ratings downgrade in Puerto Rico’s debt obligations. However, the fallout from the recent budgetary crisis and a possible ratings downgrade could adversely affect the value of Puerto Rico’s Government obligations.
Difficult market conditions have affected the financial industry andstandard-setting bodies may adversely affect the Corporation in the futureCorporation’s financial statements.
     Given that almost allThe Corporation’s financial statements are subject to the application of our business isGenerally Accepted Accounting Principles in Puerto Rico and the United States and given the degree of interrelation between Puerto Rico’s economy and that of the United States,(“GAAP”), which is periodically revised and/or expanded. Accordingly, from time to time, the Corporation is particularly exposedrequired to downturns in the U.S. economy. Dramatic declines in the U.S. housing market over the past year, with falling home prices and increasing foreclosures, unemployment and under-employment,adopt new or revised accounting standards issued by FASB. Market conditions have negatively impacted the credit performance of mortgage loans and resulted in significant write-downs of asset values byprompted accounting standard setters to promulgate new requirements that further interprets or seeks to revise accounting pronouncements related to financial institutions, including government-sponsored entitiesinstruments, structures or transactions as well as major commercial banks and investment banks. These write-downs, initiallyto issue new standards expanding disclosures. The impact of mortgage-backed securitiesaccounting pronouncements that have been issued but spreading to credit default swaps and other derivative and cash securities, in turn, have caused many financial institutions to seek additional capital from private and government entities, to merge with larger and stronger financial institutions and, in some cases, fail.
     Reflecting concern about the stability of the financial markets in general and the strength of counterparties, many lenders and institutional investors have reduced or ceased providing funding to borrowers, including other financial institutions. This market turmoil and tightening of credit have led to an increased level of commercial and consumer delinquencies, erosion of consumer confidence, increased market volatility and widespread reduction of business activity in general. The resulting economic pressure on consumers and erosion of confidencenot yet implemented is disclosed in the Corporation’s annual and quarterly reports on Form 10-K and Form 10-Q. An assessment of proposed standards is not provided as such proposals are subject to change through the exposure process and, therefore, the effects on the Corporation’s financial markets has already adversely affected our industry and may adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations. The Corporation does not expectstatements cannot be meaningfully assessed. It is possible that future accounting standards that the difficult conditions inCorporation is required to adopt could change the financial markets are likely to improve in the near future. A worsening of these conditions would likely exacerbate the adverse effects of these difficult market conditions oncurrent accounting treatment that the Corporation applies to its consolidated financial statements and others in the financial institutions industry. In particular, the Corporation may face the following risks in connection with these events:
The Corporation expects to face increased regulation of the financial industry resulting from the recent instability in capital markets, financial institutions and financial system in general. Compliance with such regulation may increase our costs and limit our ability to pursue business opportunities.
The Corporation’s ability to assess the creditworthiness of our customers may be impaired if the models and approaches we use to select, manage, and underwrite the loans become less predictive of future behaviors.
The models used to estimate losses inherent in the credit exposure requires difficult, subjective, and complex judgments, including forecasts of economic conditions and how these economic predictions might impair the ability of the borrowers to repay their loans, which may no longer be capable of accurate estimation and which may, in turn, impact the reliability of the models.
The Corporation’s ability to borrow from other financial institutions or to engage in sales of mortgage loans to third parties (including mortgage loan securitization transactions with government sponsored entities) on favorable terms, or at all could be adversely affected by further disruptions in the capital markets or other events, including deteriorating investor expectations.
Competitive dynamics in the industry could change as a result of consolidation of financial services companies in connection with current market conditions.

32


A prolonged economic slowdown or the decline in the real estate market in the U.S. mainlandthat such changes could continue to harm the results of operations
     The residential mortgage loan origination business has historically been cyclical, enjoying periods of strong growth and profitability followed by periods of shrinking volumes and industry-wide losses. The market for residential mortgage loan originations is currently in decline and this trend could also reduce the level of mortgage loans the Corporation may produce in the future and adversely impact our business. During periods of rising interest rates, refinancing originations for many mortgage products tend to decrease as the economic incentives for borrowers to refinance their existing mortgage loans are reduced. In addition, the residential mortgage loan origination business is impacted by home values. Over the past eighteen months, residential real estate values in many areas of the U.S. mainland have decreased greatly, which has led to lower volumes and higher losses across the industry, adversely impacting our mortgage business.
     The actual rates of delinquencies, foreclosures and losses on loans have been higher during the current economic slowdown. Rising unemployment, higher interest rates or declines in housing prices have had a greater negativematerial adverse effect on the ability of borrowers to repay their mortgage loans. Any sustained period of increased delinquencies, foreclosures or losses could continue to harm the Corporation’s ability to sell loans, the prices the Corporation receives for loans, the values of mortgage loans held-for-sale or residual interests in securitizations, which could harm the Corporation’s financial condition and results of operations. In addition, any material decline
The Corporation may need additional capital resources in real estate values would weaken the collateral loan-to-value ratiosfuture and increase the possibility of loss if a borrower defaults. In such event,these capital resources may not be available when needed or at all.
     Due to financial results during 2009 the Corporation may need to access the capital markets in order to raise additional capital in the future to absorb potential future credit losses due to the distressed economic environment, maintain adequate liquidity and capital resources or to finance future growth, investments or strategic acquisitions. The Corporation cannot provide assurances that such capital will be subjectavailable on acceptable terms or at all. If the Corporation is unable to the risk of loss on such mortgage asset arising from borrower defaultsobtain additional capital, it may not be able to the extent not covered by third-party credit enhancement.
There can be no assurance that actions of the U.S. Government, Federal Reservemaintain adequate liquidity and other governmental and regulatory bodies for the purpose of stabilizing the financial markets will achieve the intended effect
     In responsecapital resources or to the financial crisis affecting the banking system and financial markets and going concern threats to investment banks and other financial institutions, on October 3, 2008, President Bush signed the Emergency Economic Stabilization Act (“EESA”) into law. Pursuant to the EESA, the U.S. Treasury has the authority to, among other things, purchase up to $700 billion of mortgage-backed and other securities from financial institutions for the purpose of stabilizing the financial markets. Also a $787 billion package of spending and tax cuts was approved in early 2009 to stimulate the economy. The Federal Government, Federal Reserve and other governmental and regulatory bodies have takenfinance future growth, make strategic acquisitions or are considering taking other actions to address the financial crisis. There can be no assurance as to what impact such actions will have on the financial markets, including the extreme levels of volatility currently being experienced. Such continued volatility could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations, or the trading price of our common stock.investments.
Unexpected losses in future reporting periods may require the Corporation to adjust the valuation allowance against our deferred tax assetsassets.
     The Corporation evaluates the deferred tax assets for recoverability based on all available evidence. This process involves significant management judgment about assumptions that are subject to change from period to period based on changes in tax laws or variances between the future projected operating performance and the actual results. The Corporation is required to establish a valuation allowance for deferred tax assets if the Corporation determines, based on available evidence at the time the determination is made, that it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. In determining the more-likely-than-not criterion, the Corporation evaluates all positive and negative evidence as of the end of each reporting period. Future adjustments, either increases or decreases, to the deferred tax asset valuation allowance will be determined based upon changes in the expected realization of the net deferred tax assets. The realization of the deferred tax assets ultimately depends on the existence of sufficient taxable income in either the carryback or carryforward periods under the tax law. Due to significant estimates utilized in establishing the valuation allowance and the potential for changes in facts and circumstances, it is reasonably possible that the Corporation will be required to record adjustments to the valuation allowance in future reporting periods. Such a charge could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, financial condition and capital position.
If the Corporation’s goodwill or amortizable intangible assets become impaired, it may adversely affect the operating resultsresults.
     If the Corporation’s goodwill or amortizable intangible assets become impaired the Corporation may be required to record a significant charge to earnings. Under generally accepted accounting principles, the Corporation reviews its amortizable intangible assets for impairment when events or changes in circumstances indicateindicated the carrying value may not be recoverable. Goodwill is tested for impairment at least annually. Factors that may be considered a change in circumstances, indicating that the carrying value of the goodwill or amortizable intangible assets may not be recoverable, include a reduced future cash flow estimates, and slower growth rates in the industry.
     The goodwill impairment evaluation process requires the Corporation to make estimates and assumptions with regards to the fair value of the reporting units. Actual values may differ significantly from these estimates. Such differences could result in future impairment of goodwill that would, in turn, negatively impact the Corporation’s results of operations and the reporting unit where goodwill is recorded.
     The Corporation conducted its annual evaluation of goodwill during the fourth quarter of 2009. This evaluation is a two-step process. The Step 1 evaluation of goodwill allocated to the Florida reporting unit, which is one level below the United States business segment, indicated potential impairment of goodwill. The Step 1 fair value for the unit was below the carrying amount of its equity book value as of the December 31, 2009 valuation date, requiring the completion of Step 2. The Step 2 required a valuation of all assets and liabilities of the Florida unit, including any recognized and unrecognized intangible assets, to determine the fair value of net assets. To complete Step 2, the Corporation subtracted from the unit’s Step 1 fair value the determined fair value of the net assets to arrive at the implied fair value of goodwill. The results of the Step 2 analysis indicated that the implied fair value of goodwill exceeded the goodwill carrying value of $27 million, resulting in no goodwill impairment. If the Corporation is required to record a significant charge to earnings in the consolidated financial statements because an impairment of the goodwill or amortizable intangible assets is determined, the Corporation’s results of operations willcould be adversely affected.

3337


RISK RELATED TO BUSINESS ENVIRONMENT AND OUR INDUSTRY
Stock price volatilityDifficult market conditions have affected the financial industry and may adversely affect the Corporation in the future.
     The trading priceGiven that almost all of our business is in Puerto Rico and the United States and given the degree of interrelation between Puerto Rico’s economy and that of the Corporation’s stock could be subjectUnited States, the Corporation is particularly exposed to significant fluctuations due to a change in sentimentdownturns in the U.S. economy. Dramatic declines in the U.S. housing market regardingover the operations, business prospects or industry outlook. Risk factors may includepast few years, with falling home prices and increasing foreclosures, unemployment and under-employment, have negatively impacted the following:credit performance of mortgage loans and resulted in significant write-downs of asset values by financial institutions, including government-sponsored entities as well as major commercial banks and investment banks. These write-downs, initially of mortgage-backed securities but spreading to credit default swaps and other derivative and cash securities, in turn, have caused many financial institutions to seek additional capital from private and government entities, to merge with larger and stronger financial institutions and, in some cases, fail.
operating results that may be worse than the expectations     Reflecting concern about the stability of management, securities analysts and investors;
developments in the business or in the financial sector in general;
regulatory changes affecting the industry in general or the business and operations;
the operating and securities price performance of peer financial institutions;
announcements of strategic developments, acquisitions and other material events by the Corporation or its competitors;
changes in the credit, mortgage and real estate markets, including the markets for mortgage-related securities; and
changes in global financial markets and global economies and general market conditions.
     Stock markets in general and the Corporation’s common stock in particular,strength of counterparties, many lenders and institutional investors have recently experienced significant pricereduced or ceased providing funding to borrowers, including other financial institutions. This market turmoil and volumetightening of credit have led to an increased level of commercial and consumer delinquencies, erosion of consumer confidence, increased market volatility and widespread reduction of business activity in general. The resulting economic pressure on consumers and erosion of confidence in the financial markets has already adversely affected our industry and may adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations. The Corporation does not expect that the difficult conditions in the financial markets are likely to improve in the near future. A worsening of these conditions would likely exacerbate the adverse effects of these difficult market price ofconditions on the common stockCorporation and other financial institutions. In particular, the Corporation may continue to be subject to similar market fluctuations that may be unrelated toface the operating performancefollowing risks in connection with these events:
The Corporation expects to face increased regulation of the financial industry resulting from the recent instability in capital markets, financial institutions and financial system in general. Compliance with such regulation may increase our costs and limit our ability to pursue business opportunities.
The Corporation’s ability to assess the creditworthiness of our customers may be impaired if the models and approaches we use to select, manage, and underwrite the loans become less predictive of future behaviors.
The models used to estimate losses inherent in the credit exposure require difficult, subjective, and complex judgments, including forecasts of economic conditions and how these economic predictions might impair the ability of the borrowers to repay their loans, which may no longer be capable of accurate estimation and which may, in turn, impact the reliability of the models.
The Corporation’s ability to borrow from other financial institutions or to engage in sales of mortgage loans to third parties (including mortgage loan securitization transactions with government-sponsored entities) on favorable terms, or at all could be adversely affected by further disruptions in the capital markets or other events, including deteriorating investor expectations.
Competitive dynamics in the industry could change as a result of consolidation of financial services companies in connection with current market conditions.
A prolonged economic slowdown or prospects. Increased volatility could result in a decline in the real estate market price ofin the common stock.
Inability to pay dividends on the common stock.
     Holders of the Corporation’s common stock are only entitled to receive such dividends as our board of directors may declare out of funds legally available for such payments. Although we have historically declared cash dividends on the common stock, we are not required to do so. The Corporation expects toU.S. mainland could continue to pay dividends but its ability to pay future dividends at current levels or to pay dividends at all, will necessarily depend upon its earnings and financial condition. Any reductionharm the results of or the elimination of, the common stock dividend in the future could adversely affect the market price of the common stock.
Downgrades in the Corporation’s and its subsidiaries regulatory ratings could limit the Corporation’s ability to engage in certain activitiesoperations.
     The Corporationresidential mortgage loan origination business has historically been cyclical, enjoying periods of strong growth and profitability followed by periods of shrinking volumes and industry-wide losses. The market for residential mortgage loan originations is subject to supervisioncurrently in decline and regulation bythis trend could also reduce the FED. The Corporation is a bank holding company that qualifies as a financial holding corporation. As such, the Corporation is permitted to engage in a broader spectrumlevel of activities than those permitted to bank holding companies that are not financial holding companies. To continue to qualify as a financial holding corporation, each of the Corporation’s banking subsidiaries must continue to qualify as “well-capitalized” and “well-managed.” As of December 31, 2008, the Corporation and its banking subsidiaries continue to satisfy all applicable capital guidelines. This, however, does not prevent banking regulators from taking adverse actions against the Corporation if they should conclude that such actions are appropriate. If the Corporation were not to continue to qualify as a financial holding corporation, it might be required to discontinue certain activities and may be prohibited from engaging in new activities without prior regulatory approval. The FED, in the performance of its supervisory and enforcement duties, has significant discretion and power to initiate enforcement actions for violations of laws and regulations and unsafe or unsound practices.
Changes in regulations and legislation could have a financial impact on the Corporation
     As a financial institution, the Corporation is subject to the legislative and rulemaking authority of various regulatory and legislative bodies. Any change in regulations and/or legislation, whether in the United States or Puerto Rico, could have a financial impact on the results of operations of the Corporation.
     From time to time, legislation is introduced in Congress and state legislatures with respect to the regulation of financial institutions. It is anticipated that the 111th Congress will consider legislation affecting financial institutions in its upcoming session. Such legislation may change banking statutes and the operating environment ormortgage

3438


thatloans the Corporation may produce in the future and adversely affect our business. During periods of rising interest rates, refinancing originations for many mortgage products tend to decrease as the economic incentives for borrowers to refinance their existing mortgage loans are reduced. In addition, the residential mortgage loan origination business is impacted by home values. Over the past eighteen months, residential real estate values in many areas of the U.S. mainland have decreased significantly, which has led to lower volumes and higher losses across the industry, adversely impacting our mortgage business.
     The actual rates of delinquencies, foreclosures and losses on loans have been higher during the current economic slowdown. Rising unemployment, higher interest rates or declines in housing prices have had a greater negative effect on the ability of borrowers to repay their mortgage loans. Any sustained period of increased delinquencies, foreclosures or losses could continue to harm the Corporation’s subsidiariesability to sell loans, the prices the Corporation receives for loans, the values of mortgage loans held-for-sale or residual interests in substantial and unpredictable ways. We cannot determine the ultimate effect that potential legislation, if enacted, or any regulations issued to implement it, would have uponsecuritizations, which could harm the Corporation’s financial condition orand results of operations. In addition, any material decline in real estate values would weaken the collateral loan-to-value ratios and increase the possibility of loss if a borrower defaults. In such event, the Corporation will be subject to the risk of loss on such real asset arising from borrower defaults to the extent not covered by third-party credit enhancement.
The FDIC may increase deposit insurance premium.Corporation’s business concentration in Puerto Rico imposes risks.
     The FDIC insures deposits at FDIC insuredCorporation conducts its operations in a geographically concentrated area, as its main market is Puerto Rico. This imposes risks from lack of diversification in the geographical portfolio. The Corporation’s financial institutions up to certain limits. The FDIC charges insured financial institutions premiums to maintaincondition and results of operations are highly dependent on the Deposit Insurance Fund. Current economic conditions have increased expectations for bank failures, in which caseof Puerto Rico, where adverse political or economic developments, natural disasters, and other events could affect among others, the FDIC would take controlvolume of failed banksloan originations, increase the level of non-performing assets, increase the rate of foreclosure losses on loans, and ensure payment of deposits up to insured limits usingreduce the resourcesvalue of the Deposit Insurance Fund. In such case,Corporation’s loans and loan servicing portfolio.
The Corporation’s credit quality may be adversely affected by Puerto Rico’s current economic condition.
     Beginning in March 2006 and continuing to today’s date, a number of key economic indicators have showed that the FDIC may increase premium assessmentseconomy of Puerto Rico has been in recession during that period of time.
     Construction remained weak during 2009, as the Commonwealth’s fiscal situation and decreasing public investment in construction projects affected the sector. During the period from January to maintain adequate fundingDecember 2009, cement sales, an indicator of construction activity, declined by 29.6% as compared to 2008. As of October 2009, exports decreased by 6.8%, while imports decreased by 8.9%, a negative trade, which continues since the first negative trade balance of the Deposit Insurance Fund.last decade was registered in November 2006. Tourism activity also declined during 2009. Total hotel registrations for January to October 2009 declined 0.8% as compared to the same period for 2008. During January to September 2009 new vehicle sales decreased by 23.7%. In 2009, unemployment in Puerto Rico reached 15.0%, up 3.5 points compared with 2008.
     On January 14, 2010 the Puerto Rico Planning Board announced the release of Puerto Rico’s macroeconomic data for fiscal year 2009, ended June 30, 2009, as well as projected figures for fiscal year ending on June 30, 2010. The fiscal year 2009 showed a reduction of real GNP of - -3.7%, while the projections for the fiscal year of 2010 point toward a positive growth of 0.7%. In general, the Puerto Rico economy continued its trend of decreasing growth, primarily due to weaker manufacturing, softer consumption and decreased government investment in construction.
     The EESA included a provision forabove economic concerns and uncertainty in the private and public sectors may also have an adverse effect on the credit quality of the Corporation’s loan portfolios, as delinquency rates are expected to increase in the amountshort-term, until the economy stabilizes. Also, a potential reduction in consumer spending may also impact growth in other interest and non-interest revenue sources of deposits insured by the FDIC to $250,000 up to December 31, 2009. On October 14, 2008,Corporation.

39


Rating downgrades on the FDIC announced a new program —Government of Puerto Rico’s debt obligations may affect the Temporary Liquidity Guarantee Program that provides unlimited deposit insurance on funds in noninterest-bearing transaction deposit accounts not otherwise covered by the existing deposit insurance limit of $250,000. The Corporation decided to participate in this Temporary Liquidity Program.Corporation’s credit exposure.
     On February 27, 2009,Even though Puerto Rico’s economy is closely integrated to that of the FDIC approved an emergency special assessmentU.S. mainland and its government and many of 20 cents per $100 insured deposits that would be collectedits instrumentalities are investment-grade rated borrowers in the third quarterU.S. capital markets, the current fiscal situation of 2009 and agreedthe Government of Puerto Rico has led nationally recognized rating agencies to increase fees it will begin charging banks in April to a range of 12 cents to 16 cents per $100 deposit. Further increases may be necessarydowngrade its debt obligations in the future due to, among other things, additional increases inpast.
     Between May 2006 and mid-2009, the number of bank failures. The Corporation expects an estimated charge of approximately $25 million resulting from the emergency special assessment in 2009 and an increase of approximately $13 million in the deposit insurance premium expense for 2009, as compared to 2008,Government’s bonds were downgraded as a result of factors such as the increase inGovernment’s inability to implement meaningful steps to curb operating expenditures, improve managerial and budgetary controls, high debt levels, chronic deficits, and the regular assessment rate. Any additional increase ingovernment’s continued reliance on operating budget loans from the deposit insurance premium could have a material adverse effect on the Corporation’s financial statements.Government Development Bank for Puerto Rico.
     In October and December 2009 both S&P and Moody’s confirmed the Government’s bond rating at BBB- and Baa3 with stable outlook, respectively. At present, both rating agencies maintain the stable outlooks for the general obligation bonds. In May 2009, S&P and Moody’s upgraded the sales and use tax senior bonds from A+ to AA- and from A1 to Aa3, respectively due to a modification in its bond resolution.
     It is uncertain how the financial markets may react to any potential future ratings downgrade in Puerto Rico’s debt obligations. However, the fallout from the recent budgetary crisis and a possible ratings downgrade could adversely affect the value of Puerto Rico’s Government obligations.
The failure of other financial institutions could adversely affect the CorporationCorporation.
     The Corporation’s ability to engage in routine funding transactions could be adversely affected by the actions and commercial soundness of other financial institutions. Financial services institutions are interrelated as a result of trading, clearing, counterparty and other relationships. The Corporation has exposure to different industries and counterparties, and routinely execute transactions with counterparties in the financial services industry, including brokers and dealers, commercial banks, investment banks, investment companies and other institutional clients. In certain of these transactions the Corporation is required to post collateral to secure the obligations to the counterparties. In the event of a bankruptcy or insolvency proceeding involving one of such counterparties, the Corporation may experience delays in recovering the assets posted as collateral or may incur a loss to the extent that the counterparty was holding collateral in excess of the obligation to such counterparty. There is no assurance that any such losses would not materially and adversely affect the Corporation’s financial condition and results of operations.
     In addition, many of these transactions expose the Corporation to credit risk in the event of a default by our counterparty or client. In addition, the credit risk may be exacerbated when the collateral held by the Corporation cannot be realized upon or is liquidated at prices not sufficient to recover the full amount of the loan or derivative exposure due to the Corporation. There is no assurance that any such losses would not materially and adversely affect the Corporation’s financial condition and results of operations.
RisksLegislative and regulatory actions taken now or in the future as a result of not being able to recover all assets pledged to Lehman Brothers Special Financing, Inc.the current crisis in the financial industry may impact our business, governance structure, financial condition or results of operations.
     Lehman Brothers Special Financing, Inc. (“Lehman”) wasCurrent economic conditions, particularly in the counterpartyfinancial markets, have resulted in government regulatory agencies and political bodies placing increased focus and scrutiny on the financial services industry. The U.S. government has intervened on an unprecedented scale, responding to the Corporation on certain interest rate swap agreements. During the third quarter of 2008, Lehman failed to pay the scheduled net cash settlement due to the Corporation, which constitutes an event of default under these interest rate swap agreements. The Corporation terminated all interest rate swaps with Lehman and replaced them with another counterparty under similar terms and conditions. In connection with the unpaid net cash settlement due as of December 31, 2008, under the swap agreements, the Corporation has an unsecured counterparty exposure with Lehman, which filed for bankruptcy on October 3, 2008, of approximately $1.4 million. This exposurewhat has been reservedcommonly referred to as the financial crisis, by temporarily enhancing the liquidity support available to financial institutions, establishing a commercial paper funding facility, temporarily guaranteeing money market funds and certain types of December 31, 2008. The Corporation had pledged collateral with Lehman to guarantee its performance under the swap agreementsdebt issuances and increasing insurance on bank deposits.
     These programs have subjected financial institutions, particularly those participating in the event payment thereunder was required. The market value of pledged securities with Lehman as of December 31, 2008 amountedU.S. Treasury’s Troubled Asset Relief Program (the “TARP”), to approximately $62 million.
     The positionadditional restrictions, oversight and costs. In addition, new proposals for legislation continue to be introduced in the U.S. Congress that could further substantially increase regulation of the Corporationfinancial services industry, impose restrictions on the operations and general ability of firms within

40


the industry to conduct business consistent with historical practices, including in the areas of compensation, interest rates, financial product offerings and disclosures, and have an effect on bankruptcy proceedings with respect to consumer residential real estate mortgages, among other things. Federal and state regulatory agencies also frequently adopt changes to their regulations or change the recoverymanner in which existing regulations are applied.
     The Corporation also faces increased regulation and regulatory scrutiny as a result of our participation in the TARP. In January 2009, the Corporation issued Series F Preferred Stock and warrants to purchase the Corporation’s Common Stock to the U.S. Treasury under the TARP. Pursuant to the terms of this issuance, the Corporation is prohibited from increasing the dividend rate on our Common Stock in an amount exceeding the last quarterly cash dividend paid per share, or the amount publicly announced (if lower), of Common Stock prior to October 14, 2008, which was $0.07 per share, without approval. Furthermore, as long as Series F Preferred Stock issued to the U.S. Treasury is outstanding, dividend payments and repurchases or redemptions relating to certain equity securities, including the Corporation’s Common Stock, are prohibited unless all accrued and unpaid dividends are paid on Series F Preferred Stock, subject to certain limited exceptions.
     On January 21, 2009, the U.S. House of Representatives approved legislation amending the TARP provisions of Emergency Economic Stabilization Act (“EESA”) to include quarterly reporting requirements with respect to lending activities, examinations by an institution’s primary federal regulator of the collateral, after discussionuse of funds and compliance with program requirements, restrictions on acquisitions by depository institutions receiving TARP funds and authorization for the U.S. Treasury to have an observer at board meetings of recipient institutions, among other things. On February 17, 2009, President Obama signed into law the American Reinvestment and Recovery Act of 2009 (the “ARRA”). The ARRA contains expansive new restrictions on executive compensation for financial institutions and other companies participating in the TARP. The ARRA amends the executive compensation and corporate governance provisions of EESA. In doing so, it continues all the same compensation and governance restrictions and adds substantially to restrictions in several areas. In addition, on June 10, 2009, the U.S. Treasury issued regulations implementing the compensation requirements under the ARRA. The regulations became applicable to existing TARP recipients upon publication in the Federal Register on June 15, 2009. The aforementioned compensation requirements and restrictions may adversely affect our ability to retain or hire senior bank officers.
     The U.S. House of Representatives approved a regulatory reform package on December 11, 2009 (H.R. 4173). The U.S. Senate is also expected to consider financial reform legislation during 2010. H.R. 4173 and a “Discussion Draft” of legislation that may be introduced in the U.S. Senate contain provisions, which would, among other things, establish a Consumer Financial Protection Agency, establish a systemic risk regulator, consolidate federal bank regulators and give shareholders an advisory vote on executive compensation. Separate legislative proposals call for partial repeal of the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act of 1999 (the “GLB Act”), which is discussed below.
     The Obama administration is also requesting Congressional action to limit the growth of the largest U.S. financial firms and to bar banks and bank-related companies from engaging in proprietary trading and from owning, investing in or sponsoring hedge funds or private equity funds. A separate legislative proposal would impose a new fee or tax on U.S. financial institutions as part of the 2010 budget plans in an effort to reduce the anticipated budget deficit and to recoup losses anticipated from the TARP. Such an assessment is estimated to be 15-basis points, levied against bank assets minus Tier 1 capital and domestic deposits. It appears that this fee or tax would be assessed only against the 50 or so largest financial institutions in the U.S., which are those with more than $50 billion in assets, and therefore would not directly affect First BanCorp. However, the large banks that are affected by the tax may choose to seek additional deposit funding in the marketplace, driving up the cost of deposits for all banks. The administration has also considered a transaction tax on trades of stock in financial institutions and a tax on executive bonuses.
     The U.S. Congress has also recently adopted additional consumer protection laws such as the Credit Card Accountability Responsibility and Disclosure Act of 2009, and the Federal Reserve has adopted numerous new regulations addressing banks’ credit card, overdraft and mortgage lending practices. Additional consumer protection legislation and regulatory activity is anticipated in the near future.
     Internationally, both the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (the “Basel Committee”) and the Financial Stability Board (established in April 2009 by the Group of Twenty Finance Ministers and Central Bank Governors to take action to strengthen regulation and supervision of the financial system with greater international consistency,

41


cooperation and transparency) have committed to raise capital standards and liquidity buffers within the banking system.
     Such proposals and legislation, if finally adopted, would change banking laws and our operating environment and that of our subsidiaries in substantial and unpredictable ways. The Corporation cannot determine whether such proposals and legislation will be adopted, or the ultimate effect that such proposals and legislation, if enacted, or regulations issued to implement the same, would have upon its outsidefinancial condition or results of operations.
Monetary policies and regulations of the Federal Reserve could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
     In addition to being affected by general economic conditions, the earnings and growth of First BanCorp are affected by the policies of the Federal Reserve. An important function of the Federal Reserve is to regulate the money supply and credit conditions. Among the instruments used by the Federal Reserve to implement these objectives are open market operations in U.S. Government securities, adjustments of the discount rate and changes in reserve requirements against bank deposits. These instruments are used in varying combinations to influence overall economic growth and the distribution of credit, bank loans, investments and deposits. Their use also affects interest rates charged on loans or paid on deposits.
     On January 6, 2010, the member agencies of the Federal Financial Institutions Examination Council (the “FFIEC”), which includes the Federal Reserve, issued an interest rate risk advisory reminding banks to maintain sound practices for managing interest rate risk, particularly in the current environment of historically low short-term interest rates.
     The monetary policies and regulations of the Federal Reserve have had a significant effect on the operating results of commercial banks in the past and are expected to continue to do so in the future. The effects of such policies upon our business, financial condition and results of operations cannot be predicted.
The Corporation faces extensive and changing government regulation, which may increase our costs of and expose us to risks related to compliance.
     Most of our businesses are subject to extensive regulation by multiple regulatory bodies. These regulations may affect the manner and terms of delivery of our services. If we do not comply with governmental regulations, we may be subject to fines, penalties, lawsuits or material restrictions on our businesses in the jurisdiction where the violation occurred, which may adversely affect our business operations. Changes in these regulations can significantly affect the services that we are asked to provide as well as our costs of compliance with such regulations. In addition, adverse publicity and damage to our reputation arising from the failure or perceived failure to comply with legal, counsel, is that at all times titleregulatory or contractual requirements could affect our ability to attract and retain customers. In recent years, regulatory oversight and enforcement have increased substantially, imposing additional costs and increasing the collateral has been vestedpotential risks associated with our operations. If this regulatory trend continues, it could adversely affect our operations and, in turn, our consolidated results of operations.
We are subject to regulatory capital adequacy guidelines, and if we fail to meet these guidelines our business and financial condition may be adversely affected.
     Under regulatory capital adequacy guidelines, and other regulatory requirements, the Corporation and the Bank must meet guidelines that therefore, this collateral shouldinclude quantitative measures of assets, liabilities and certain off-balance sheet items, subject to qualitative judgments by regulators regarding components, risk weightings and other factors. If we fail to meet these minimum capital guidelines and other regulatory requirements, our business and financial condition will be materially and adversely affected. If we fail to maintain well-capitalized status under the regulatory framework, or are deemed to be not well-managed under regulatory exam procedures, or if we experience certain regulatory violations, our status as a financial holding company and our related eligibility for any purpose,a streamlined review process for acquisition proposals, and our ability to offer certain financial products will be considered property of the bankruptcy estate available for distribution among Lehman’s creditors. On January 30, 2009, the Corporation filed a customer claim with the trustee and at this time the Corporation is unable to determine the timing of the claim resolution or whether it will succeed in recovering all or a substantial portion of the collateral or its equivalent value. As additional relevant facts become available in future periods, a need to recognize a partial or full reserve of this claim may arise.compromised.

3542


ChangesThe imposition of additional property tax payments in accounting standardsPuerto Rico may further deteriorate our commercial, consumer and mortgage loan portfolios.
     On March 9, 2009, the Governor of Puerto Rico signed into law the Special Act Declaring a State of Fiscal Emergency and Establishing an Integral Plan of Fiscal Stabilization to Save Puerto Rico’s Credit, Act No. 7 the “Act”). The Act imposes a series of temporary and permanent measures, including the imposition of a 0.591% special tax applicable to properties used for residential (excluding those exempt as detailed in the Act) and commercial purposes, and payable to the Puerto Rico Treasury Department. This temporary measure will be effective for tax years that commenced after June 30, 2009 and before July 1, 2012. The imposition of this special property tax could adversely affect the disposable income of borrowers from the commercial, consumer and mortgage loan portfolios and may cause an increase in our delinquency and foreclosure rates.
RISKS RELATING TO AN INVESTMENT IN THE CORPORATION’S SECURITIES
The market price of the Corporation’s common stock may be subject to significant fluctuations and volatility.
     The stock markets have recently experienced high levels of volatility. These market fluctuations have adversely affected, and may continue to adversely affect, the trading price of the Corporation’s common stock. In addition, the market price of the Corporation’s common stock has been subject to significant fluctuations and volatility because of factors specifically related to its businesses and may continue to fluctuate or further decline. Factors that could cause fluctuations, volatility or further decline in the market price of the Corporation’s common stock, many of which could be beyond its control, include the following:
changes or perceived changes in the condition, operations, results or prospects of the Corporation’s businesses and market assessments of these changes or perceived changes;
announcements of strategic developments, acquisitions and other material events by the Corporation or its competitors;
changes in governmental regulations or proposals, or new governmental regulations or proposals, affecting the Corporation, including those relating to the recent financial crisis and global economic downturn and those that may be specifically directed to the Corporation;
the continued decline, failure to stabilize or lack of improvement in general market and economic conditions in the Corporation’s principal markets;
the departure of key personnel;     
changes in the credit, mortgage and real estate markets;
operating results that vary from the expectations of management, securities analysts and investors; and
operating and stock price performance of companies that investors deem comparable to the Corporation.
Our suspension of dividends could adversely affect our stock price and result in the expansion of our board of directors.
     In March of 2009, the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System issued a supervisory guidance letter intended to provide direction to bank holding companies (“BHCs”) on the declaration and payment of dividends, capital redemptions and capital repurchases by BHCs in the Financial Accounting Standards Boardcontext of their capital planning process. The letter reiterates the long-standing Federal Reserve supervisory policies and guidance to the effect that BHCs should only pay dividends from current earnings. More specifically, the letter heightens expectations that BHCs will inform and consult with the Federal Reserve supervisory staff on the declaration and payment of dividends that exceed earnings for the period for which a dividend is being paid. In consideration of the financial results reported for the second quarter ended June 30, 2009, the Corporation decided, as a matter of prudent fiscal management and following the Federal Reserve guidance, to suspend payment of common stock dividends and dividends on all series of preferred stock. The Corporation cannot anticipate if and when the payment of dividends might be reinstated.

43


     This suspension could adversely affect the Corporation’s stock price. Further, in general, if dividends on our preferred stock are not paid for six quarterly dividend periods or more, the authorized number of directors of the board will be increased by two and the preferred stockholders will have the right to elect two additional members of the Corporation’s board of directors until all accrued and unpaid dividends for all past dividend periods have been declared and paid in full.
Dividends on the Corporation’s common stock have been suspended and a holder may not receive funds in connection with its investment in our common stock without selling its shares of common stock.
     Holders of common stock are only entitled to receive such dividends as the Corporation’s board of directors may declare out of funds legally available for such payments. The Corporation announced the suspension of dividend payments on its common stock. In general, so long as any shares of preferred stock remain outstanding and until the Corporation satisfies various Federal regulatory considerations, the Corporation cannot declare, set apart or pay any dividends on shares of the Corporation’s common stock unless all accrued and unpaid dividends on its preferred stock for the twelve monthly dividend periods ending on the immediately preceding dividend payment date have been paid or are paid contemporaneously and the full monthly dividend on its preferred stock for the then current month has been or is contemporaneously declared and paid or declared and set apart for payment. Furthermore, prior to January 16, 2012, unless the Corporation has redeemed all of the shares of Series F Preferred Stock (or any successor security) or the U.S. Treasury has transferred all of Series F Preferred Stock (or any successor security) to third parties, the consent of the U.S. Treasury will be required for the Corporation to, among other standard-setting bodiesthings, increase the dividend rate per share of Common Stock above $0.07 per share or to repurchase or redeem equity securities, including the Corporation’s common stock, subject to certain limited exceptions. This could adversely affect the market price of the Corporation’s common stock. Also, the Corporation is a bank holding company and its ability to declare and pay dividends is dependent on certain Federal regulatory considerations, including the guidelines of the Federal Reserve regarding capital adequacy and dividends. Moreover, the Federal Reserve and the FDIC have issued policy statements stating that bank holding companies and insured banks should generally pay dividends only out of current operating earnings. In the current financial and economic environment, the Federal Reserve has indicated that bank holding companies should carefully review their dividend policy and has discouraged dividend pay-out ratios that are at the 100% or higher level unless both asset quality and capital are very strong.
     In addition, the terms of the Corporation’s outstanding junior subordinated debt securities held by trusts that issue trust preferred securities prohibit the Corporation from declaring or paying any dividends or distributions on its capital stock, including its common stock and preferred stock, or purchasing, acquiring, or making a liquidation payment on such stock, if the Corporation has given notice of its election to defer interest payments but the related deferral period has not yet commenced or a deferral period is continuing.
Offerings of debt, which would be senior to the common stock upon liquidation and/or to preferred equity securities, which may be senior to the common stock for purposes of dividend distributions or upon liquidation, may adversely affect the Corporation’s financial statementsmarket price of the common stock.
     The Corporation may attempt to increase its capital resources or, if its or the capital ratios of FirstBank fall below the required minimums, the Corporation or FirstBank could be forced to raise additional capital by making additional offerings of debt or preferred equity securities, including medium-term notes, trust preferred securities, senior or subordinated notes and preferred stock. Upon liquidation, holders of debt securities and shares of preferred stock and lenders with respect to other borrowings will receive distributions of the Corporation’s financial statements are subjectavailable assets prior to the applicationholders of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles in the United States (“GAAP”), whichcommon stock. Additional equity offerings may dilute the holdings of existing stockholders or reduce the market price of the common stock, or both.
     The Corporation’s board of directors is periodically revised and/authorized to issue one or expanded. Accordingly,more classes or series of preferred stock from time to time without any action on the part of the stockholders. The Corporation’s board of directors also has the power, without stockholder approval, to set the terms of any such classes or series of preferred stock that may be issued, including voting rights, dividend rights and preferences over the common stock with respect to dividends or upon the Corporation’s dissolution, winding up and liquidation and other terms. If the Corporation issues preferred shares in the future that have a preference over the common stock with respect to the payment of dividends or upon liquidation, or if the Corporation issues preferred shares with voting rights that dilute the voting power of the

44


common stock, the rights of holders of the common stock or the market price of the common stock could be adversely affected.
There may be future dilution of the Corporation’s common stock.
     In January 2009, in connection with the U.S. Treasury’s TARP Capital Purchase Program, established as part of the Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008, the Corporation issued to the U.S. Treasury 400,000 shares of its Fixed Rate Cumulative Perpetual Preferred Stock, Series F, $1,000 liquidation preference value per share. In connection with this investment, the Corporation also issued to the U.S. Treasury a warrant to purchase 5,842,259 shares of the Corporation’s common stock (the “Warrant”) at an exercise price of $10.27 per share. The Warrant has a 10-year term and is exercisable at any time. The exercise price and the number of shares issuable upon exercise of the Warrant are subject to certain anti-dilution adjustments. In addition, in connection with its sale of 9,250,450 shares of common stock to the Bank of Nova Scotia (“BNS”), the Corporation agreed to give BNS an anti-dilution right and a right of first refusal when the Corporation sells shares of common stock to third parties. The possible future issuance of equity securities through the exercise of the Warrant or to BNS as a result of its rights could affect the Corporation’s current stockholders in a number of ways, including by:
diluting the voting power of the current holders of common stock (the shares underlying the Warrant represent approximately 6% of the Corporation’s outstanding shares of common stock as of December 31, 2009 and BNS owns 10% of the Corporation’s shares of common stock);
diluting the earnings per share and book value per share of the outstanding shares of common stock; and
making the payment of dividends on common stock more expensive.
Also, recent increases in the allowance for loan and lease losses resulted in a reduction in the amount of the Corporation’s tangible common equity. Given the focus on tangible common equity by regulatory authorities and rating agencies, the Corporation may be required to adopt new or revised accounting standards issued byraise additional capital through the FASB. Market conditions have prompted accounting standard settersissuance of additional common stock in future periods to promulgate new guidance which further interprets or seeksincrease that tangible common equity. However, no assurance can be given that the Corporation will be able to revise accounting pronouncements related to financial instruments, structures or transactions as well as to issue new standards expanding disclosures. The impact of accounting pronouncements that have been issued but not yet implemented is disclosedraise additional capital. An increase in the Corporation’s annual and quarterly reports on Form 10-K and Form 10-Q. An assessmentcapital through an issuance of proposed standards is not provided as such proposals are subject to change through the exposure process and, therefore, the effects on the Corporation’s financial statements cannot be meaningfully assessed. It is possible that future accounting standards that the Corporation is required to adopt could change the current accounting treatment that the Corporation applies to its consolidated financial statements and that such changescommon stock could have a material adversedilutive effect on the Corporation’s financial conditionexisting holders of our Common Stock and results of operations.may adversely affect its market price.

3645


Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments
     None.
Item 2. Properties
     As of December 31, 2008,2009, First BanCorp owned the following three main offices located in Puerto Rico:
     Main offices:
 - Headquarters — Located at First Federal Building, 1519 Ponce de León Avenue, Santurce, Puerto Rico, a 16 story office building. Approximately 60% of the building, an underground three level parking lot and an adjacent parking lot are owned by the Corporation.
 
 - EDP & Operations Center — A five-story structure located at 1506 Ponce de León Avenue, Santurce, Puerto Rico. These facilities are fully occupied by the Corporation.
 
 - Consumer Lending Center — A three-story building with a three-level parking lot located at 876 Muñoz Rivera Avenue, Hato Rey, Puerto Rico. These facilities are fully occupied by the Corporation.
 
 - In addition, during 2006, First BanCorp purchased the following officea building located on 1130 Muñoz Rivera Avenue, Hato Rey, Puerto Rico. These facilities are being renovated and expanded to accommodate branch operations, data processing, administrative and certain headquarter offices. FirstBank expects to commence occupancy in Puerto Rico:summer 2010.
          A building located on 1130 Muñoz Rivera Avenue, Hato Rey, Puerto Rico. These facilities are being renovated and expanded to accommodate branch operations, data processing, administrative and certain headquarter offices. FirstBank expects to commence occupancy as soon as practicable but not earlier than 2010.
     The Corporation owned 2524 branch and office premises and auto lots and leased 118117 branch premises, loan and office centers and other facilities. In certain situations, financial services such as mortgage, insurance businesses and commercial banking services are located in the same building. All of these premises are located in Puerto Rico, Florida and in the U.S. and British Virgin Islands. Management believes that the Corporation’s properties are well maintained and are suitable for the Corporation’s businessesbusiness as presently conducted.
Item 3. Legal Proceedings
     The Corporation and its subsidiaries are defendants in various lawsuits arising in the ordinary course of business. In the opinion of the Corporation’s management the pending and threatened legal proceedings of which management is aware will not have a material adverse effect on the financial condition or results of operations of the Corporation.
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security HoldersReserved
     Not applicable.

3746


PART II
Item 5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity and Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
Information about Market and Holders Information
     The Corporation’s common stock is traded on the New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”) under the symbol FBP. On December 31, 2008,2009, there were 543540 holders of record of the Corporation’s common stock.
     The following table sets forth, for the calendar quarters indicated, the high and low closing sales prices and the cash dividends declared on the Corporation’s common stock during such periods.
                                
 Dividends Dividends
Quarter Ended High Low Last per Share High Low Last per Share
2009:
 
December $2.88 $1.51 $2.30 $ 
September 4.20 3.01 3.05  
June 7.55 3.95 3.95 0.07 
March 11.05 3.63 4.26 0.07 
 
2008:
  
December $12.17 $7.91 $11.14 $0.07  $12.17 $7.91 $11.14 $0.07 
September 12.00 6.05 11.06 0.07  12.00 6.05 11.06 0.07 
June 11.20 6.34 6.34 0.07  11.20 6.34 6.34 0.07 
March 10.97 7.56 10.16 0.07  10.97 7.56 10.16 0.07 
  
2007:
  
December $10.16 $6.15 $7.29 $0.07  $10.16 $6.15 $7.29 $0.07 
September 11.06 8.62 9.50 0.07  11.06 8.62 9.50 0.07 
June 13.64 10.99 10.99 0.07  13.64 10.99 10.99 0.07 
March 13.52 9.08 13.26 0.07  13.52 9.08 13.26 0.07 
 
2006:
 
December $10.79 $9.39 $9.53 $0.07 
September 11.15 8.66 11.06 0.07 
June 12.22 8.90 9.30 0.07 
March 13.15 12.20 12.36 0.07 
     First BanCorp has five outstanding series of non convertible preferred stock: 7.125% non-cumulative perpetual monthly income preferred stock, Series A (liquidation preference $25 per share); 8.35% non-cumulative perpetual monthly income preferred stock, Series B (liquidation preference $25 per share); 7.40% non-cumulative perpetual monthly income preferred stock, Series C (liquidation preference $25 per share); 7.25% non-cumulative perpetual monthly income preferred stock, Series D (liquidation preference $25 per share,); and 7.00% non-cumulative perpetual monthly income preferred stock, Series E (liquidation preference $25 per share) (collectively “Preferred Stock”), which trade on the NYSE.
     On January 16, 2009, the Corporation issued to the U.S. Treasury the Series F Preferred Stock and the Warrant, which transaction is described in Item 1 — Recent Significant Events on page 8.9.
     The Series A, B, C, D, E and F Preferred Stock rank on parity with respect to dividend rights and rights upon liquidation, winding up or dissolution. Holders of each series of preferred stock will beare entitled to receive cash dividends, when, as and if declared by the board of directors of First BanCorp out of funds legally available for dividends. The Purchase Agreement of the Series F Preferred stock contains limitations on the payment of dividends on common stock, including limiting regular quarterly cash dividends to an amount not exceeding the last quarterly cash dividend paid per share, or the amount publicly announced (if lower), of common stock prior to October 14, 2008, which is $0.07 per share.
     The terms of the Corporation’s preferred stock do not permit the Corporation to declare, set apart or pay any dividend or make any other distribution of assets on, or redeem, purchase, set apart or otherwise acquire shares of common stock or of any other class of stock of First BanCorp ranking junior to the preferred stock, unless all accrued and unpaid dividends on the preferred stock and any parity stock, for the twelve monthly dividend periods ending on the immediately preceding dividend payment date, shall have been paid or are paid contemporaneously;

47


the full monthly dividend on the preferred stock and any parity stock for the then current month has been or is

38


contemporaneously declared and paid or declared and set apart for payment; and the Corporation has not defaulted in the payment of the redemption price of any shares of the preferred stock and any parity stock called for redemption. If the Corporation is unable to pay in full the dividends on the preferred stock and on any other shares of stock of equal rank as to the payment of dividends, all dividends declared upon the preferred stock and any such other shares of stock will be declared pro rata.
     The Corporation may not issue shares ranking, as to dividend rights or rights on liquidation, winding up and dissolution, senior to the Series A, B, C, D, E and F Preferred Stock, except with the consent of the holders of at least two-thirds of the outstanding aggregate liquidation preference of the Series A, B, C, D, E and F Preferred Stock.
        Dividends
     The Corporation has a policy of paying quarterly cash dividends on its outstanding shares of common stock. Accordingly,stock subject to its earnings and financial condition. On July 30, 2009 after reporting a net loss for the quarter ended June 30, 2009, the Corporation announced that the Board of Directors resolved to suspend the payment of the common and preferred dividends (including the Series F Preferred Stock dividends), effective with the preferred dividend for the month of August 2009. During 2009, the Corporation declared a cash dividend of $0.07 per share for the first two quarters of the year. During years 2008 and 2007, the Corporation declared a cash dividend of $0.07 per share for each quarter of 2008, 2007 and 2006.such years. The Corporation expects to continue to pay dividends but itsCorporation’s ability to pay future dividends at current levels or to pay dividends at all, will necessarily depend upon its earnings and financial condition. See the discussion under “Dividend Restrictions” under Item 1 for additional information concerning restrictions on the payment of dividends that apply to the Corporation and FirstBank.
     First BanCorp did not purchase any of its equity securities during 20082009 or 2007.2008.
     The Puerto Rico Internal Revenue Code requires the withholding of income tax from dividend income derived by resident U.S. citizens, special partnerships, trusts and estates and non-resident U.S. citizens, custodians, partnerships, and corporations from sources within Puerto Rico.
     Resident U.S. Citizens
     A special tax of 10% is imposed on eligible dividends paid to individuals, special partnerships, trusts, and estates to be applied to all distributions unless the taxpayer specifically elects otherwise. Once this election is made it is irrevocable. However, the taxpayer can elect to include in gross income the eligible distributions received and take a credit for the amount of tax withheld. If the taxpayer does not make this election on the tax return, then he can exclude from gross income the distributions received and reported without claiming the credit for the tax withheld.
     Nonresident U.S. Citizens
     Nonresident U.S. citizens have the right to certain exemptions when a Withholding Tax Exemption Certificate (Form 2732) is properly completed and filed with the Corporation. The Corporation, as withholding agent, is authorized to withhold a tax of 10% only from the excess of the income paid over the applicable tax-exempt amount.
     U.S. Corporations and Partnerships
     Corporations and partnerships not organized under Puerto Rico laws that have not engaged in trade or business in Puerto Rico during the taxable year in which the dividend is paid are subject to the 10% dividend tax withholding. Corporations or partnerships not organized under the laws of Puerto Rico that have engaged in trade or business in Puerto Rico are not subject to the 10% withholding, but they must declare the dividend as gross income on their Puerto Rico income tax return.

3948


     Securities authorized for issuance under equity compensation plans
     The following summarizes equity compensation plans approved by security holders and equity compensation plans that were not approved by security holders as of December 31, 2008:2009:
                        
 Number of Securities  Number of Securities 
 Weighted-Average Remaining Available for  Weighted-Average Remaining Available for 
 Number of Securities Exercise Price of Future Issuance Under  Number of Securities Exercise Price of Future Issuance Under 
 to be Issued Upon Outstanding Equity Compensation  to be Issued Upon Outstanding Equity Compensation 
 Exercise of Outstanding Options, warrants Plans (Excluding Securities  Exercise of Outstanding Options, warrants Plans (Excluding Securities 
 Options and rights Reflected in Column (A))  Options and rights Reflected in Column (A)) 
Plan category (A) (B) (C)  (A) (B) (C) 
Equity compensation plans approved by stockholders  3,910,910(1) $12.82  3,763,757(2)  2,481,310 (1) $13.46  3,767,784 (2)
Equity compensation plans not approved by stockholders N/A N/A N/A  N/A N/A N/A 
              
Total 3,910,910 $12.82 3,763,757  2,481,310 $13.46 3,767,784 
              
 
(1) Stock options granted under the 1997 stock option plan which expired on January 21, 2007. All outstanding awards under the stock option plan continue in full forth and effect, subject to their original terms and the shares of common stock underlying the options are subject to adjustments for stock splits, reorganization and other similar events.
 
(2) Securities available for future issuance under the First BanCorp 2008 Omnibus Incentive Plan (the “Omnibus Plan”) approved by stockholder on April 29, 2008. The Omnibus Plan provides for equity-based compensation incentives (the “awards”) through the grant of stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock, restricted stock units, performance shares, and other stock-based awards. This plan allows the issuance of up to 3,800,000 shares of common stock, subject to adjustments for stock splits, reorganization and other similar events.

4049


STOCK PERFORMANCE GRAPH
     The following Performance Graph shall not be deemed incorporated by reference by any general statement incorporating by reference this Annual Report onForm 10-K into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”) or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that First BanCorp specifically incorporates this information by reference, and shall not otherwise be deemed filed under these Acts.
     The graph below compares the cumulative total stockholder return of First BanCorp during the measurement period with the cumulative total return, assuming reinvestment of dividends, of the S&P 500 Index and the S&P Supercom Banks Index (the “Peer Group”). The Performance Graph assumes that $100 was invested on December 31, 20032004 in each of First BanCorp’sBanCorp’ common stock, the S&P 500 Index and the Peer Group. The comparisons in this table are set forth in response to SEC disclosure requirements, and are therefore not intended to forecast or be indicative of future performance of First BanCorp’s common stock.
     The cumulative total stockholder return was obtained by dividing (i) the cumulative amount of dividends per share, assuming dividend reinvestment since the measurement point, December 31, 2003,2004, plus (ii) the change in the per share price since the measurement date, by the share price at the measurement date.

4150


ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
ITEM 6.SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
     The following table sets forth certain selected consolidated financial data for each of the five years in the period ended December 31, 2008.2009. This information should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements and the related notes thereto.
SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
(Dollars in thousands except for per share data and financial ratios results)
                                        
 Year Ended December 31, Year Ended December 31,
 2008 2007 2006 2005 2004 2009 2008 2007 2006 2005
Condensed Income Statements:
  
Total interest income $1,126,897 $1,189,247 $1,288,813 $1,067,590 $690,334  $996,574 $1,126,897 $1,189,247 $1,288,813 $1,067,590 
Total interest expense 599,016 738,231 845,119 635,271 292,853  477,532 599,016 738,231 845,119 635,271 
Net interest income 527,881 451,016 443,694 432,319 397,481  519,042 527,881 451,016 443,694 432,319 
Provision for loan and lease losses 190,948 120,610 74,991 50,644 52,800  579,858 190,948 120,610 74,991 50,644 
Non-interest income 74,643 67,156 31,336 63,077 59,624  142,264 74,643 67,156 31,336 63,077 
Non-interest expenses 333,371 307,843 287,963 315,132 180,480  352,101 333,371 307,843 287,963 315,132 
Income before income taxes 78,205 89,719 112,076 129,620 223,825 
Income tax benefit (provision) 31,732  (21,583)  (27,442)  (15,016)  (46,500)
Net income 109,937 68,136 84,634 114,604 177,325 
Net income attributable to common stockholders 69,661 27,860 44,358 74,328 137,049 
(Loss) income before income taxes  (270,653) 78,205 89,719 112,076 129,620 
Income tax (expense) benefit  (4,534) 31,732  (21,583)  (27,442)  (15,016)
Net (loss) income  (275,187) 109,937 68,136 84,634 114,604 
Net (loss) income attributable to common stockholders  (322,075) 69,661 27,860 44,358 74,328 
  
Per Common Share Results(1):
 
Net income per common share basic $0.75 $0.32 $0.54 $0.92 $1.70 
Net income per common share diluted $0.75 $0.32 $0.53 $0.90 $1.65 
Per Common Share Results:
 
Net (loss) income per common share basic $(3.48) $0.75 $0.32 $0.54 $0.92 
Net (loss) income per common share diluted $(3.48) $0.75 $0.32 $0.53 $0.90 
Cash dividends declared $0.28 $0.28 $0.28 $0.28 $0.24  $0.14 $0.28 $0.28 $0.28 $0.28 
Average shares outstanding 92,508 86,549 82,835 80,847 80,419  92,511 92,508 86,549 82,835 80,847 
Average shares outstanding diluted 92,644 86,866 83,138 82,771 83,010  92,511 92,644 86,866 83,138 82,771 
Book value per common share $10.78 $9.42 $8.16 $8.01 $8.10  $7.25 $10.78 $9.42 $8.16 $8.01 
Tangible book value per common share(1) $10.22 $8.87 $7.50 $7.29 $7.90  $6.76 $10.22 $8.87 $7.50 $7.29 
  
Balance Sheet Data:
  
Loans and loans held for sale $13,088,292 $11,799,746 $11,263,980 $12,685,929 $9,697,994  $13,949,226 $13,088,292 $11,799,746 $11,263,980 $12,685,929 
Allowance for loan and lease losses 281,526 190,168 158,296 147,999 141,036  528,120 281,526 190,168 158,296 147,999 
Money market and investment securities 5,709,154 4,811,413 5,544,183 6,653,924 5,699,201  4,866,617 5,709,154 4,811,413 5,544,183 6,653,924 
Intangible assets 52,083 51,034 54,908 58,292 16,014 
Intangible Assets 44,698 52,083 51,034 54,908 58,292 
Deferred tax asset, net 128,039 90,130 162,096 130,140 75,077  109,197 128,039 90,130 162,096 130,140 
Total assets 19,491,268 17,186,931 17,390,256 19,917,651 15,637,045  19,628,448 19,491,268 17,186,931 17,390,256 19,917,651 
Deposits 13,057,430 11,034,521 11,004,287 12,463,752 7,912,322  12,669,047 13,057,430 11,034,521 11,004,287 12,463,752 
Borrowings 4,736,670 4,460,006 4,662,271 5,750,197 6,300,573  5,214,147 4,736,670 4,460,006 4,662,271 5,750,197 
Total preferred equity 550,100 550,100 550,100 550,100 550,100  928,508 550,100 550,100 550,100 550,100 
Total common equity 940,628 896,810 709,620 663,416 610,597  644,062 940,628 896,810 709,620 663,416 
Accumulated other comprehensive gain (loss), net of tax 57,389  (25,264)  (30,167)  (15,675) 43,636 
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax 26,493 57,389  (25,264)  (30,167)  (15,675)
Total equity 1,548,117 1,421,646 1,229,553 1,197,841 1,204,333  1,599,063 1,548,117 1,421,646 1,229,553 1,197,841 
  
Selected Financial Ratios (In Percent):
  
Profitability:
  
Return on Average Assets 0.59 0.40 0.44 0.64 1.30   (1.39) 0.59 0.40 0.44 0.64 
Return on Average Total Equity 7.67 5.14 7.06 8.98 15.73   (14.84) 7.67 5.14 7.06 8.98 
Return on Average Common Equity 7.89 3.59 6.85 10.23 23.75   (34.07) 7.89 3.59 6.85 10.23 
Average Total Equity to Average Total Assets 7.74 7.70 6.25 7.09 8.28  9.36 7.74 7.70 6.25 7.09 
Interest Rate Spread(2)
 2.83 2.29 2.35 2.87 3.06 
Interest Rate Margin(2)
 3.20 2.83 2.84 3.23 3.37 
Interest Rate Spread(1)(2)
 2.62 2.83 2.29 2.35 2.87 
Interest Rate Margin(1)(2)
 2.93 3.20 2.83 2.84 3.23 
Tangible common equity ratio(1)
 3.20 4.87 4.79 3.60 2.97 
Dividend payout ratio 37.19 88.32 52.50 30.46 14.10   (4.03) 37.19 88.32 52.50 30.46 
Efficiency ratio(3)
 55.33 59.41 60.62 63.61 39.48  53.24 55.33 59.41 60.62 63.61 
  
Asset Quality:
  
Allowance for loan and lease losses to loans receivable 2.15 1.61 1.41 1.17 1.46  3.79 2.15 1.61 1.41 1.17 
Net charge-offs to average loans 0.87 0.79 0.55 0.39 0.48  2.48 0.87 0.79 0.55 0.39 
Provision for loan and lease losses to net charge-offs 1.76x 1.36x 1.16x 1.12x 1.38x 1.74x 1.76x 1.36x 1.16x 1.12x
Non-performing assets to total assets 3.27 2.56 1.54 0.75 0.69  8.71 3.27 2.56 1.54 0.75 
Non-accruing loans to total loans receivable 4.49 3.50 2.24 1.06 0.95 
Allowance to total non-accruing loans 47.95 46.04 62.79 110.18 153.86 
Allowance to total non-accruing loans, excluding residential real estate loans 90.16 93.23 115.33 186.06 234.72 
Non-performing loans to total loans receivable 11.23 4.49 3.50 2.24 1.06 
Allowance to total non-performing loans 33.77 47.95 46.04 62.79 110.18 
Allowance to total non-performing loans, excluding residential real estate loans 47.06 90.16 93.23 115.33 186.06 
  
Other Information:
  
Common Stock Price: End of period $11.14 $7.29 $9.53 $12.41 $31.76  $2.30 $11.14 $7.29 $9.53 $12.41 
 
(1) Amounts presented were recalculated, when applicable,Non-gaap measures. Refer to retroactively consider the effect“Capital” discussion below for additional information of the June 30, 2005 two-for-one common stock split.components and reconciliation of these measures.
 
(2) On a tax equivalent basis (see “Net Interest Income” discussion below).
 
(3) Non-interest expenses to the sum of net interest income and non-interest income. The denominator includes non-recurring income and changes in the fair value of derivative instruments and financial instruments measured at fair value under SFAS 159.value.

4251


ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
     The following Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations relates to the accompanying consolidated audited financial statements of First BanCorp (the “Corporation” or “First BanCorp”) and should be read in conjunction with the audited financial statements and the notes thereto.
DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS
     First BanCorp is a diversified financial holding company headquartered in San Juan, Puerto Rico offering a full range of financial products to consumers and commercial customers through various subsidiaries. First BanCorp is the holding company of FirstBank Puerto Rico (“FirstBank” or the “Bank”), Ponce General Corporation (the holding company of FirstBank Florida), Grupo Empresas de Servicios Financieros (d/b/a “PR Finance Group”) and FirstBank Insurance Agency. Through its wholly-owned subsidiaries, the Corporation operates offices in Puerto Rico, the United States and British Virgin Islands and the State of Florida (USA) specializing in commercial banking, residential mortgage loan originations, finance leases, personal loans, small loans, auto loans,vehicle rental and insurance agency services.
ECONOMIC AND MARKET ENVIRONMENT
     In the second half of 2008 the volatility and disruptions in the capital and credit markets have reached dramatic levels. Bankruptcies and forced mergers of major investment banks and commercial banks in the United States, government bailouts of mortgage giants Fannie Mae (“FNMA”) and Freddie Mac (“FHLMC”), government support of the insurance company American International Group and increasing concerns about the ability of other financial institutions to stay capitalized have exacerbated the market disruptions and stress in the credit markets that have affected the economy over the past year. Following a series of ad-hoc market interventions to bail out particular firms, a $700 billion Troubled Asset Relief Program to stimulate economic growth and inspire confidence in the financial markets by the purchase of distressed assets was signed into law on October 3, 2008 and a $787 billion package of spending and tax cuts was approved in early 2009 to stimulate an economy that has been officially in recession since December 2007. Legislation has also increased the limit on deposit insurance at banks and credit unions and authorized the Federal Reserve to pay interest on reserves. The credit market remained tight despite passage of the $700 billion rescue plan in 2008 and it is uncertain the effect of the economic stimulus package recently approved by the new government in the United States. The Federal Reserve has taken steps to support market liquidity by lowering the Federal Funds rate and the discount rate, encouraging banks to use their short-term lending windows and determining to provide a facility to increase the availability of commercial paper to eligible issuers. Other Central Banks have also announced reductions in policy interest rates.broker-dealer activities.
     As is the case with most commercial banks, the lack of liquidity in global credit markets may affect the Corporation’s access to regular and customary sources of funding. Also, the slowing economy and deteriorating housing market in the United States have required increased reserves on the Corporation’s loan portfolio, in particular on the $197 million condo-conversion loan portfolio in the U.S. mainland. However, the Corporation is well capitalized and profitable and maintains sufficient liquidity to operate in a sound and safe manner. The Corporation has taken precautionary steps to enhance its liquidity positions and safeguard the access to credit by, among other things, increasing its borrowing capacity with the Federal Home Loan Bank (FHLB) and the Federal Reserve (FED) through the Discount Window Program, the issuance of additional brokered certificates of deposit (“CDs”) to increase its liquidity levels and the extension of the maturities of borrowings to reduce exposure to high levels of market volatility. The Corporation’s results of operations are sensitive to fluctuations in interest rates. Changes in interest rates can materially affect key earnings drivers such as the volume of loan originations, net interest income earned, and gains/losses on investment security holdings. The Corporation manages interest rate risk on an ongoing basis through asset/liability management strategies, which have included the use of various derivative instruments. The Corporation also manages credit risk inherent in loan portfolios through underwriting, loan review and collection functions.
     The Corporation has not been active in subprime or adjustable rate mortgage loans (“ARMs”), nor has it been exposed to collateral debt obligations or other types of exotic products that aggravated the current financial crisis in the United States. More than 90% of the Corporation’s outstanding balance in its residential mortgage loan portfolio

43


consists of fixed-rate, fully amortizing, full documentation loans and over 90% of the Corporation’s securities portfolio is invested in U.S. Government and Agency debentures and U.S. government-sponsored agency fixed-rate mortgage-backed securities (“MBS”) (mainly FNMA and FHLMC fixed-rate securities). In connection with the placement of FNMA and FHLMC into conservatorship by the U.S. Treasury in September 2008, the Treasury entered into agreements to invest up to approximately $100 billion in each agency to, among other things, protect debt and mortgage-backed securities of the agencies. As of December 31, 2008 the Corporation had $4.0 billion and $0.9 billion in FNMA and FHLMC mortgage-backed securities and debt securities, respectively, representing approximately 87% of the total investment portfolio. The Corporation’s investment in equity securities is minimal, and it does not own any equity or debt securities of U.S. financial institutions that recently failed. Also, as part of its credit risk management, the Corporation maintains strict and conservative underwriting guidelines, diversifies the counterparties used and monitors the concentration of risk to limit its counterparty exposure. For more information on current exposure with respect to the Corporation’s derivative instruments and outstanding repurchase agreements by counterparty, management of liquidity risk and current liquidity levels, see the “Risk Management” discussion below and Notes 13, 29 and 30 to the Corporation’s audited financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2008 included in Item 8 of this Form 10-K.
     The Corporation’s principal market is Puerto Rico. Although affected by the economic situation in the United States, Puerto Rico’s economy has been in a recession since early 2006 due to several local conditions including Puerto Rico government budget shortfalls and diminished consumer buying power. Nevertheless, the election of new governments in Puerto Rico and in the United States and the expectations of new measures to positively impact the economy may renew the confidence of consumers and businesses in Puerto Rico.
     The Corporation has seen stress in the credit quality of, and worsening trends affecting its construction loan portfolio, in particular condo conversion loans in the U.S. mainland (mainly in the state of Florida) affected by the continuing deterioration in the health of the economy, an oversupply of new homes and declining housing prices in the United States. The Corporation also increased its reserves for the residential mortgage, commercial and construction loan portfolio from the 2007 level to account for the increased credit risk tied to recessionary conditions in Puerto Rico’s economy. Nevertheless, the Puerto Rico housing market has not seen the dramatic decline in housing prices that is affecting the U.S. mainland but there is a lower demand due to the diminished consumer’s acquisition power and confidence. Since 2005 the Corporation has taken actions and implemented initiatives designed to strengthen the Corporation’s credit policies as well as loss mitigation initiatives that have begun to have the desired effects as reflected by a decrease in consumer loans charge-offs and a relative stability in non-performing residential mortgage loans (as a percentage of total residential mortgage loans) . The degree of the impact of economic conditions on the Corporation’s financial results is dependent upon the duration and severity of the aforementioned conditions. For example, the credit risk is affected by a deteriorating economy to the extent that the borrowers’ spending capacity is decreased and, as a result, may not be able to make scheduled payments when due. A deteriorating economy could also lead to a decline in real estate values and therefore the reduction of the borrowers’ capacity to refinance loans and increase the Corporation’s exposure to losses upon default. For more information on credit quality, see the “Risk Management –Allowance for Loan and Lease Losses and Non-performing Assets” discussion below.

44


OVERVIEW OF RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
     First BanCorp’s results of operations depend primarily upon its net interest income, which is the difference between the interest income earned on its interest-earning assets, including investment securities and loans, and the interest expense incurred on its interest-bearing liabilities, including deposits and borrowings. Net interest income is affected by various factors, including: the interest rate scenario; the volumes, mix and composition of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities; and the re-pricing characteristics of these assets and liabilities. The Corporation’s results of operations also depend on the provision for loan and lease losses, which significantly affected the results for the year ended December 31, 2009, non-interest expenses (such as personnel, occupancy and other costs), non-interest income (mainly service charges and fees on loans and deposits and insurance income), the results of its hedging activities, gains (losses) on investments, gains (losses) on sale of loans,mortgage banking activities, and income taxes.taxes which also significantly affected 2009 results.
     Net incomeloss for the year ended December 31, 20082009 amounted to $275.2 million or $(3.48) per diluted common share, compared to net income of $109.9 million or $0.75 per diluted common share compared tofor 2008 and net income of $68.1 million or $0.32 per diluted common share for 2007 and $84.6 million or $0.53 per diluted common share for 2006.2007.
     The Corporation’s financial performanceresults for 2008,2009, as compared to 2007, was2008, were principally impacted by: (i) an increase of $76.9 million in net interest income, as the Corporation benefited from lower short-term interest rates on its interest-bearing liabilities as compared to rate levels during 2007 that more than offset lower loan yields on its commercial and construction loan portfolio, (ii) an income tax benefit of $31.7 million for 2008 compared to an income tax expense of $21.6 million for 2007, a fluctuation mainly related to lower taxable income, the reversal of $10.6 million of Unrecognized Tax Benefits (“UTBs”), and an income tax benefit of $5.4 million in connection with an agreement entered into with the Puerto Rico taxing authority, as discussed below, and (iii) a net gain on investments of $21.2 million in 2008 compared to a net loss of $2.7 million in 2007, impacted by a gain of $9.3 million on the mandatory redemption of a portion of the Corporation’s investment in VISA, Inc. (“VISA”) as part of VISA’s Initial Public Offering (“IPO”) in March 2008 and realized gains of $17.9 million on the sale of fixed-rate MBS. These factors were partially offset by: (i) an increase of $70.3$388.9 million in the provision for loan and lease losses dueattributable to the significant increase in the volume of non-performing and impaired loans, the migration of loans to higher risk categories, increases in loss factors used to determine general reserves to account for increases in charge-offs, delinquency levels and weak economic conditions, and the overall growth of the loan portfolio, (ii) an increase of $36.3 million in income tax expense, affected by a non-cash increase of $184.4 million in the Corporation’s deferred tax asset valuation allowance due to losses incurred in 2009, (iii) an increase of $18.7 million in non-interest expenses driven by increases in specific reserves for impairedthe FDIC deposit insurance premium partially offset by a reduction in employees’ compensation and benefit expenses, and (iv) a decrease of $8.8 million in net interest income mainly due to lower loan yields adversely affected by the higher volume of non-performing loans and the repricing of adjustable rate commercial and construction loans adversely impactedtied to short-term indexes. These factors were partially offset by deteriorating economic conditions, and (ii) an increase of $19.0$67.6 million in lossesnon-interest income primarily due to realized gains of $86.8 million on real estate owned operations (“REO”) driven by a higher volumethe sale of repossessed properties and declining real estate prices,investment securities in 2009, mainly in the U.S. mainland, that have caused write-downs in the value of repossessed properties.Agency mortgage-backed securities.

4552


     The following table summarizes the effect of the aforementioned factors and other factors that significantly impacted financial results in previous years on net (loss) income attributable to common stockholders and (loss) earnings per common share for the last three years:
                                                
 Year Ended December 31,  Year Ended December 31, 
 2008 2007 2006  2009 2008 2007 
 Dollars Per Share Dollars Per Share Dollars Per Share  Dollars Per Share Dollars Per Share Dollars Per Share 
 (In thousands, except for per common share amounts)  (In thousands, except for per common share amounts) 
Net income attributable to common stockholders for prior year $27,860 $0.32 $44,358 $0.53 $74,328 $0.90  $69,661 $0.75 $27,860 $0.32 $44,358 $0.53 
Increase (decrease) from changes in:  
Net interest income 76,865 0.88 7,322 0.09 11,375 0.14   (8,839)  (0.10) 76,865 0.88 7,322 0.09 
Provision for loan and lease losses  (70,338)  (0.81)  (45,619)  (0.55)  (24,347)  (0.29)  (388,910)  (4.20)  (70,338)  (0.81)  (45,619)  (0.55)
Net gain (loss) on investments and impairments 23,919 0.28 5,468 0.06  (20,533)  (0.25) 63,953 0.69 23,919 0.28 5,468 0.06 
Gain (loss) on partial extinguishment and recharacterization of secured commercial loans to local financial institutions  (2,497)  (0.03) 13,137 0.16  (10,640)  (0.13)    (2,497)  (0.03) 13,137 0.16 
Gain on sale of credit card portfolio  (2,819)  (0.03) 2,319 0.03 500 0.01     (2,819)  (0.03) 2,319 0.03 
Insurance reimbursement and other agreements related to a contingency settlement  (15,075)  (0.17) 15,075 0.18       (15,075)  (0.17) 15,075 0.18 
Other non-interest income 3,959 0.05  (179)   (1,068)  (0.01) 3,668 0.04 3,959 0.05  (179)  
Employees’ compensation and benefits  (1,490)  (0.02)  (12,840)  (0.15)  (25,445)  (0.31) 9,119 0.10  (1,490)  (0.02)  (12,840)  (0.15)
Professional fees 4,942 0.06 11,344 0.13  (18,708)  (0.23) 592 0.01 4,942 0.06 11,344 0.13 
Deposit insurance premium  (3,424)  (0.04)  (5,073)  (0.06)  (366)    (30,471)  (0.33)  (3,424)  (0.04)  (5,073)  (0.06)
Provision for contingencies (SEC & Class Action suit settlements)     82,750 1.00 
Net loss on REO operations  (18,973)  (0.22)  (2,382)  (0.03) 325    (490)  (0.01)  (18,973)  (0.22)  (2,382)  (0.03)
Core deposit intangible impairment  (3,988)  (0.04)     
All other operating expenses  (6,583)  (0.08)  (10,929)  (0.13)  (11,387)  (0.14) 6,508 0.07  (6,583)  (0.08)  (10,929)  (0.13)
Income tax provision 53,315 0.61 5,859 0.07  (12,426)  (0.15)  (36,266)  (0.39) 53,315 0.61 5,859 0.07 
                          
Net income after preferred stock dividends and change in average common shares 69,661 0.80 27,860 0.33 44,358 0.54 
 
Net (loss) income before changes in preferred stock dividends, preferred discount amortization and change in average common shares  (315,463)  (3.41) 69,661 0.80 27,860 0.33 
Change in preferred dividends and preferred discount amortization  (6,612)  (0.07)     
Change in average common shares (1)   (0.05)   (0.01)   (0.01)     (0.05)   (0.01)
                          
Net income attributable to common stockholders $69,661 $0.75 $27,860 $0.32 $44,358 $0.53 
Net (loss) income attributable to common stockholders $(322,075) $(3.48) $69,661 $0.75 $27,860 $0.32 
                          
 
(1) For 2008, mainly attributed to the sale of 9.250 million common shares to the Bank of Nova Scotia (“Scotiabank”) in the second half of 2007.
Net loss for the year ended December 31, 2009 was $275.2 million compared to net income of $109.9 million and net income of $68.1 million for the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively.
Diluted loss per common share for the year ended December 31, 2009 amounted to $(3.48) compared to earnings per diluted share of $0.75 and $0.32 for the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively.
Net income for the year ended December 31, 2008 was $109.9 million compared to $68.1 million and $84.6 million for the years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively.
Diluted earnings per common share for the year ended December 31, 2008 amounted to $0.75 compared to $0.32 and $0.53 for the years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively.
 Net interest income for the year ended December 31, 20082009 was $527.9$519.0 million compared to $451.0$527.9 million and $443.7$451.0 million for the years ended December 31, 20072008 and 2006,2007, respectively. Net interest spread and margin on an adjusted tax equivalent basis (for definition and reconciliation of this non-GAAP measure, refer to the“Net Interest Income” discussion below) were 2.83%2.62% and 3.20%2.93%, respectively, up 54down 21 and 3727 basis points from 2007.2008. The decrease for 2009 compared to 2008 was mainly associated with a significant increase in non-performing loans and the repricing of floating-rate commercial and construction loans at lower rates due to decreases in market interest rates such as three-month LIBOR and the Prime rate, even though the Corporation is actively increasing spreads on loan renewals. The Corporation increased the use of interest rate floors in new commercial and construction loans agreements and renewals in 2009 to protect net interest margins going forward. Lower loan yields more than offset the benefit of lower short-term rates in the average cost of funding and the increase in average interest-earning assets. Refer to the “Net Interest Income”discussion below for additional information.
The increase in net interest income for 2008, compared to 2007, was mainly associated with a decrease in the average cost of funds resulting from lower short-term interest rates and, to a lesser extent, to a higher volume of interest earninginterest-earning assets. The decrease in funding costs more than offset lower loanloans yields resulting from the repricing of variable-rate construction and commercial loans tied to short-term indexes and from a higher volume of non-accrual loans.
Approximately $14.2 million of the total net interest income increase is related to positive fluctuations in the fair value of derivative instruments and financial liabilities elected to be measured at fair value under Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. (“SFAS”) 159, “The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities”. Most of the Corporation’s derivative instruments are interest rate swaps used to economically hedge callable brokered CDs and medium-term notes.
Average earning assets for 2008 increased by $1.3 billion, as compared to 2007, driven by commercial and residential real estate loan originations, and to a lesser extent, purchases of loans during 2008 that contributed to a wider spread. In addition, the Corporation purchased approximately $3.2 billion in U.S. government agency fixed-rate MBS having an average yield of 5.44% during 2008, which is higher than the cost of the borrowing required to finance the purchase of such assets; thus contributing to a higher net interest income as compared to 2007. Refer to the “Net Interest Income”discussion below for additional information.

46


The increase in net interest income for 2007, compared to 2006, was principally due to the effect in the financial results of 2006 of unrealized losses related to changes in the fair value of derivative instruments prior to the implementation of the long-haul method of accounting on April 3, 2006. Prior to the second quarter of 2006, the Corporation recorded changes in the fair value of derivative instruments as non-hedging instruments through operations as part of interest expense. The adoption of fair value hedge accounting in the second quarter of 2006 and the adoption of SFAS 159 in 2007 reduced the accounting volatility that previously resulted from the accounting asymmetry created by accounting for the financial liabilities at amortized cost and the derivatives at fair value. The mark-to-market valuation changes for the year ended December 31, 2007 amounted to a net non-cash loss of $9.1 million, compared to net non-cash losses of $58.2 million for 2006.
Net interest income on an adjusted tax equivalent basis decreased 10% for 2007, as compared to 2006, (from $529.9 million in 2006 to $475.4 million in 2007). Adjusted tax equivalent net interest income excludes the effect of mark-to-market valuation changes on derivative instruments and financial liabilities measured at fair value and includes an adjustment that increases interest income on tax-exempt securities and loans by an amount which makes tax-exempt income comparable, on a pre-tax basis, to the Corporation’s taxable income. The decrease in adjusted tax equivalent net interest income in 2007, as compared to 2006, was mainly driven by the continued pressure of the flattening of the yield curve during most of 2007 and the decrease in the average volume of interest earning assets primarily attributable to the repayment of approximately $2.4 billion received from a local financial institution reducing the balance of its secured commercial loan with the Corporation during the latter part of the second quarter of 2006.
The provision for loan and lease losses for 20082009 was $190.9$579.9 million compared to $190.9 million and $120.6 million for 2008 and $75.0 million for 2007, and 2006, respectively. The increase for 2008,2009, as compared to 2007, is2008, was mainly attributable to the significant increase in delinquency levels and increases in specific reserves for impaired commercial and construction loans. During 2008, the Corporation experienced continued stress in the credit quality of and worsening trends on its construction loan portfolio, in particular, condo-conversion loans affected by the continuing deterioration in the health of the economy, an oversupply of new homes and declining housing prices in the United States and on its commercial loan portfolio adversely impacted by deteriorating economic conditions in Puerto Rico. Also, higher reserves for residential mortgage loans in Puerto Rico and in the United States were necessary to account for the credit risk tied to recessionary conditions in the economy. The current economic recession in Puerto Rico is expected to continue at least through the remainder of 2009.

53


The increase in the Corporation’s provision for 2007, as compared to 2006, was due to a deterioration in the credit quality of the Corporation’s loan portfolio which was associated with the weakening economic conditions in Puerto Rico and the slowdown in the United States housing sector. These conditions resulted in higher net charge-offs relating to Puerto Rico consumer loans as well as commercial and construction loans, representing an increase of $6.9 million and $8.7 million, respectively, as compared to 2006 and higher provisions allocated to the Corporation’s construction loan portfolio originated by its Corporate Banking operations in Miami, Florida (USA). During the second half of 2007, the Corporation recorded a specific reserve of $8.1 million on four condo-conversion loans with an aggregate principal balance at the date of the evaluation of $60.5 million extended to a single borrower.
to the significant increase in non-performing loans and increases in specific reserves for impaired commercial and construction loans. Also, the migration of loans to higher risk categories and increases to loss factors used to determine the general reserve allowance contributed to the higher provision.
The increase for 2008, as compared to 2007, was mainly attributable to the significant increase in delinquency levels and increases in specific reserves for impaired commercial and construction loans. During 2008, the Corporation experienced continued stress in the credit quality of and worsening trends on its construction loan portfolio, in particular, condo-conversion loans affected by the continuing deterioration in the health of the economy, an oversupply of new homes and declining housing prices in the United States and on its commercial loan portfolio which was adversely impacted by deteriorating economic conditions in Puerto Rico. Also, higher reserves for residential mortgage loans in Puerto Rico and in the United States were necessary to account for the credit risk tied to recessionary conditions in the economy.
Refer to the “Provision for Loan and Lease Losses” and “Risk Management” discussions below for additional information with respect to this troubled relationship and further analysis of the allowance for loan and lease losses and non-performing assets and related ratios.
Non-interest income for the year ended December 31, 20082009 was $74.6$142.3 million compared to $67.2$74.6 million and $31.3$67.2 million for the years ended December 31, 20072008 and 2006,2007, respectively. The increase in non-interest income in 2008,2009, compared to 2007, is2008, was mainly related to a $59.6 million increase in realized gain of $17.7 milliongains on the sale of investment securities, (mainly U.S. sponsored agency fixed-rate MBS) and to theprimarily reflecting a $79.9 million gain of $9.3 million on the sale of partmortgage-backed securities (“MBS”) (mainly U.S. agency fixed-rate MBS), compared to realized gains on the sale of MBS of $17.7 million in 2008. In an effort to manage interest rate risk, and taking advantage of favorable market valuations, approximately $1.8 billion of U.S. agency MBS (mainly 30 year fixed-rate U.S. agency MBS) were sold in 2009, compared to approximately $526 million of U.S. agency MBS sold in 2008. Also contributing to higher non-interest income was the Corporation’s investment$5.3 million increase in VISAgains from mortgage banking activities, due to the increased volume of loan sales and securitizations. Servicing assets recorded at the time of sale amounted to $6.1 million for 2009 compared to $1.6 million for 2008. The increase was mainly related to $4.6 million of capitalized servicing assets in connection with VISA’s IPO. A surgethe securitization of approximately $305 million FHA/VA mortgage loans into GNMA MBS. For the first time in MBS prices, mainly due toseveral years, the recent announcementCorporation has been engaged in the securitization of mortgage loans since early 2009.
The increase in non-interest income in 2008, compared to 2007, was related to a realized gain of $17.7 million on the sale of investment securities (mainly U.S. sponsored agency fixed-rate MBS) and to the gain of $9.3 million on the sale of part of the Corporation’s investment in VISA in connection with VISA’s initial public offering (“IPO”). A surge in MBS prices, mainly due to announcements of the Federal Reserve (“FED”) that it will invest up to $600 billion in obligations from U.S. government-sponsored agencies, including $500 billion in MBS, provided an opportunity to realize a gain on the sale of approximately $284 million fixed-rate U.S. agency MBS at a gain of $11.0 million. Early in 2008, a spike and subsequent contraction in yield spread for U.S. agency MBS also provided an opportunity for the sale of approximately $242 million and a realized gain of $6.9 million.

47


Higher point of sale (POS) and ATM interchange fee income and an increase in fee income from cash management services provided to corporate customers also contributed to the increase in non-interest income. The increase in non-interest income attributable to these activities was partially offset, when comparing 2008 to 2007, by isolated events such as the $15.1 million income recognition for reimbursement expenses related to the class action lawsuit settled in 2007 (see below), and a gain of $2.8 million on the sale of a credit card portfolio and $2.5 million on the partial extinguishment and recharacterization of a secured commercial loan to a local financial institution that were all recognized in 2007.
The increase in non-interest income in 2007, compared to 2006, was mainly attributable to the income recognition of approximately $15.1 million for reimbursement of expenses, mainly from insurance carriers, related to the settlement of the class action lawsuit brought against the Corporation, a decrease of $9.3 million in other-than-temporary impairment charges related to the Corporation’s equity securities portfolio, the fluctuation resulting from gains and losses recorded on partial repayments of certain secured commercial loans extended to local financial institutions (a gain of $2.5 million recorded in 2007 compared to a loss of $10.6 million recorded in 2006), a higher gain on the sale of its credit card portfolio (a gain of $2.8 million recorded in 2007 compared to $0.5 million recorded in 2006) pursuant to a strategic alliance reached with a U.S. financial institution and higher income from service charges on loans (an increase of $0.9 million or 16% as compared to 2006) due to the increase in the loan portfolio volume driven by new originations.
Refer to “Non-Interest Income”discussion below for additional information.
Non-interest expenses for 2008 were $333.4 million compared to $307.8 million and $288.0 million for 2007 and 2006, respectively. The increase in non-interest expenses for 2008, as compared to 2007, is principally attributable to: (i) a higher net loss on REO operations that increased to $21.4 million for 2008 from $2.4 million for 2007, driven by a higher inventory of repossessed properties and declining real estate prices, mainly in the U.S. mainland, that have caused write-downs on the value of repossessed properties, and (ii) an increase of $3.4 million in deposit insurance premium expense, as the Corporation used available one-time credits to offset the premium increase in 2007 resulting from a new assessment system adopted by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”), and (iii) higher occupancy and equipment expenses, an increase of $2.9 million tied to the growth of the Corporation’s operations. The Corporation has been able to continue the growth of its operations without incurring in substantial additional operating expenses as reflected by a slight increase of 2% in operating expenses, excluding the increase in credit cost. Modest increases were observed in occupancy and equipment expenses, an increase of $2.9 million, and in employees’ compensation and benefits, an increase of $1.5 million.
The increase in non-interest expenses for 2007, as compared to 2006, was mainly due to a $12.8 million increase in employees’ compensation and benefits expense primarily due to increases in the average compensation and related fringe benefits paid to employees, coupled with the accrual of approximately $3.3 million for a voluntary separation program established by the Corporation as part of its cost saving strategies, a $5.1 million increase in the deposit insurance premium expense resulting from changes in the premium calculation by the FDIC, a $4.5 million increase in occupancy and equipment expenses mainly attributable to increases in costs associated with the expansion of the Corporation’s branch network and loan origination offices and an increase of $6.4 million in other operating expenses primarily attributable to a $3.3 million increase related to costs associated with capital raising efforts in 2007 not qualifying for capitalization coupled with increased costs associated with foreclosure actions on the aforementioned troubled loan relationship in Miami, Florida. These factors were partially offset by an $11.3 million decrease in professional fees attributable to the conclusion during 2006 of the Audit Committee’s review and the restatement process.
For 2008, the Corporation recorded an income tax benefit of $31.7 million, compared to an income tax expense of $21.6 million for 2007. The fluctuation is mainly related to lower taxable income. A significant portion of revenues was derived from tax-exempt assets and operations conducted through the international banking entity, FirstBank Overseas Corporation. Also, the positive fluctuation in financial results was impacted by two transactions: (i) a reversal of $10.6 million of UTBs during the second quarter of 2008 for positions taken on income tax returns recorded under the provisions of Financial Accounting Standards Board Interpretation No. (“FIN”) 48 due to the lapse of the statute of limitations for the 2003 taxable year, and (ii) the recognition of an income tax benefit of $5.4 million in connection with an agreement entered into with the Puerto Rico Department of Treasury during the first quarter of 2008 that established a multi-year allocation schedule for deductibility of the $74.25 million payment made by the Corporation during 2007 to settle a securities class action suit.

48


Income tax expense for the year ended December 31, 2007 was $21.6 million (or 24% of pre-tax earnings) compared to $27.4 million (or 24% of pre-tax earnings) for the year ended December 31, 2006. The decrease in income tax expense in 2007 as compared to 2006 was primarily due to lower taxable income coupled with the effect of a lower statutory tax rate in Puerto Rico for 2007 (39% in 2007 compared to 43.5% in 2006). Refer to “Income Taxes”discussion below for additional information.
Total assets as of December 31, 2008 amounted to $19.5 billion, an increase of $2.3 billion compared to $17.2 billion as of December 31, 2007. The Corporation’s loan portfolio increased by $1.3 billion (before the allowance for loan and lease losses), driven by new originations, mainly commercial and residential mortgage loans and the purchase of a $218 million auto loan portfolio during the third quarter of 2008. Also, the increase in total assets is attributable to the purchase of approximately $3.2 billion of fixed-rate U.S. government agency MBS during the first half of 2008 as market conditions presented an opportunity to obtain attractive yields, improve its net interest margin and replace $1.2 billion of U.S. Agency debentures called by counterparties. The Corporation increased its cash and money market investments by $26.8 million in part as a precautionary measure during the present economic climate.
As of December 31, 2008, total liabilities amounted to $17.9 billion, an increase of approximately $2.2 billion as compared to $15.8 billion as of December 31, 2007. The increase in total liabilities was mainly attributable to a higher volume of deposits, as the Corporation has been issuing brokered CDs to finance its lending activities and accumulate additional liquidity due to current market volatility, and an increase in repurchase agreements issued to finance the purchase of MBS in the first half of 2008. Total deposits, excluding brokered CDs, increased by $770.1 million from the balance as of December 31, 2007, reflecting increases in deposits from all sectors; including individuals, commercial entities and the government.
The Corporation’s stockholders’ equity amounted to $1.5 billion as of December 31, 2008, an increase of $126.5 million compared to the balance as of December 31, 2007, driven by net income of $109.9 million recorded for 2008 and a net unrealized gain of $82.7 million on the fair value of available-for-sale securities recorded as part of comprehensive income. The increase in the fair value of MBS was mainly in response to the announcement by the U.S. government that it will invest up to $600 billion in obligations from housing-relatedU.S. government-sponsored agencies, including $500 billion in MBS, backed by FNMA, FHLMCprovided an opportunity to realize a sale of approximately $284 million fixed-rate U.S. agency MBS at a gain of $11.0 million. Early in 2008, a spike and GNMA. Partially offsetting these increases were dividends declared during 2008 amounting to $66.2 million ($25.9 million or $0.28 per common stock and $40.3 millionsubsequent contraction in preferred stock).
Total loan production, including purchases,yield spread for U.S. agency MBS also provided an opportunity for the year ended December 31, 2008 was $4.2 billion comparedsale of approximately $242 million and a realized gain of $6.9 million. Higher point of sale (POS) and ATM interchange fee income and an increase in fee income from cash management services provided to $4.1 billion and $4.9 billion forcorporate customers also contributed to the years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively.increase in non-interest income. The increase in non-interest income attributable to these activities was partially offset, when comparing 2008 to 2007, by isolated events such as the $15.1 million income recognition for reimbursement of expenses, mainly from insurance carriers, related to the class action lawsuit settled in 2007, and a gain of $2.8 million on the sale of a credit card portfolio and of $2.5 million on the partial extinguishment and recharacterization of a secured commercial loan productionto a local financial institution that were all recognized in 2007.
Refer to “Non-Interest Income” discussion below for additional information.
Non-interest expenses for 2009 was $352.1 million compared to $333.4 million and $307.8 million for 2008 and 2007, respectively. The increase in non-interest expenses for 2009, as compared to 2008, was principally attributable to: (i) an increase of $30.5 million in the FDIC deposit insurance premium, including $8.9 million for the special assessment levied by the FDIC in 2009 and increases in regular assessment rates, (ii) a $4.0 million core deposit intangible impairment charge, and (iii) a $1.8 million increase in the reserve for probable losses on outstanding unfunded loan commitments. The aforementioned increases were partially offset by decreases in certain controllable expenses such as: (i) a $9.1 million decrease in employees’ compensation and benefit expenses, due to a lower headcount and reductions in bonuses, incentive compensation and overtime costs, (ii) a $3.4 million decrease in business promotion expenses due to a lower

54


level of marketing activities, and (iii) a $1.1 million decrease in taxes, other than income taxes, driven by a reduction in municipal taxes which are assessed based on taxable gross revenues.
The increase in non-interest expenses for 2008, as compared to 2007, is mainly associated with an increase in commercial loan originations and the purchase ofwas principally attributable to: (i) a $218higher net loss on REO operations that increased to $21.4 million auto loan portfolio. The decrease in loan productionfor 2008 from $2.4 million for 2007, as compared to 2006, was mainly due to decreases in the originationdriven by a higher inventory of residentialrepossessed properties and declining real estate and commercial loans attributable, among other things, to the slowdown in the Puerto Rico and U.S. housing market and to stricter underwriting standards.
Total non-performing assets as of December 31, 2008 were $637.2 million compared to $439.3 million as of December 31, 2007. The slumping economy and deteriorating housing market in the United States coupled with recessionary conditions in Puerto Rico’s economy, have resulted in higher non-performing balances in all of the Corporation’s loan portfolios. Total non-performing assetsprices, mainly in the U.S. mainland, increased to $104.0 million asthat have caused write-downs on the value of December 31, 2008 from $58.5 million at the end of 2007, up $45.5 million or 78%. All segments were severely affected by the economyrepossessed properties, and housing market crisis in the U.S. with the total variance resulting from: (i) an increase of $13.8 million for residential real estate loans and $3.6 million for foreclosed residential properties; (ii) an increase of $4.1$3.4 million in non-performing construction, land loansdeposit insurance premium expense, as the Corporation used available one-time credits to offset the premium increase in 2007 resulting from a new assessment system adopted by the FDIC, and foreclosed condo-conversion projects; (iii) higher occupancy and equipment expenses, an increase of $23.3$2.9 million tied to the growth of the Corporation’s operations. The Corporation was able to continue the growth of its operations without incurring substantial additional non-interest expenses as reflected by a slight increase of 2% in commercial loans, mainly secured by real estate,non-interest expenses, excluding the increase in REO operations losses. Modest increases were observed in occupancy and (iv)equipment expenses, an increase of $0.7$2.9 million, and in the consumer lending sector.employees’ compensation and benefit, an increase of $1.5 million. Refer to the “Risk Management” “Non-Interest Expenses”discussion below for additional information with respect to dispositions of non-performing assets in the United States during 2008 and further analysis.information.
For 2009, the Corporation recorded an income tax expense of $4.5 million, compared to an income tax benefit of $31.7 million for 2008. The income tax expense for 2009 mainly resulted from the aforementioned $184.4 million non-cash increase in the valuation allowance for the Corporation’s deferred tax asset. The increase in the valuation allowance was driven by the losses incurred in 2009 that placed FirstBank in a three-year cumulative loss position as of the end of the third quarter of 2009.
For 2008, the Corporation recorded an income tax benefit of $31.7 million, compared to an income tax expense of $21.6 million for 2007. The fluctuation was mainly related to lower taxable income. A significant portion of revenues was derived from tax-exempt assets and operations conducted through the international banking entity, FirstBank Overseas Corporation. Also, the positive fluctuation in financial results was impacted by two transactions: (i) a reversal of $10.6 million of Unrecognized Tax Benefits (“UTBs”) during the second quarter of 2008 for positions taken on income tax returns due to the lapse of the statute of limitations for the 2003 taxable year, and (ii) the recognition of an income tax benefit of $5.4 million in connection with an agreement entered into with the Puerto Rico Department of Treasury during the first quarter of 2008 that established a multi-year allocation schedule for deductibility of the $74.25 million payment made by the Corporation during 2007 to settle a securities class action suit.
Refer to “Income Taxes” discussion below for additional information.
Total non-performing assets inas of December 31, 2009 amounted to $19.6 billion, an increase of $137.2 million compared to $19.5 billion as of December 31, 2008. The Corporation’s loan portfolio increased by $860.9 million (before the allowance for loan and lease losses), driven by new originations, mainly credit facilities extended to the Puerto Rico increasedGovernment and/or its political subdivisions. Also, an increase of $298.4 million in cash and cash equivalents contributed to $512.6the increase in total assets, as the Corporation improved its liquidity position as a precautionary measure given current volatile market conditions. Partially offsetting the increase in loans and liquid assets was a $790.8 million decrease in investment securities, driven by sales and principal repayments of MBS.
As of December 31, 2009, total liabilities amounted to $18.0 billion, an increase of $86.2 million as compared to $17.9 billion as of December 31, 2008. The increase in total liabilities was mainly attributable to an increase of $818 million in short-term advances from the FED and FHLB and an increase of $480 million in non-brokered deposits, partially offset by a decrease of $868.4 million in brokered CDs and a decrease of $344.4 million in repurchase agreements. The Corporation has been reducing the reliance on brokered CDs and is focused on core deposit growth initiatives in all of the markets served.
The Corporation’s stockholders’ equity amounted to $1.6 billion as of December 31, 2009, an increase of $50.9 million compared to the balance as of December 31, 2008, from $362.1driven by the $400 million atinvestment by the endUnited States Department of 2007, up $150.5the Treasury (the “U.S. Treasury”) in preferred stock of the Corporation through the U.S. Treasury Troubled Asset Relief Program (TARP) Capital Purchase Program. This was partially offset by the net loss of $275.2 million recorded for 2009, dividends paid amounting to $43.1 million in 2009 ($13.0 million on common stock, or 42%. The total variance breakdown includes: (i) an$0.14 per share, and $30.1 million on preferred stock) and a $30.9 million decrease in other comprehensive income mainly due to a noncredit-related impairment of

4955


$31.7 million on private label MBS.
Total loan production, including purchases and refinancings, for the year ended December 31, 2009 was $4.8 billion compared to $4.2 billion and $4.1 billion for the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively. The increase in loan production in 2009, as compared to 2008, was mainly associated with a $977.9 million increase in commercial loan originations driven by approximately $1.7 billion in credit facilities extended to the Puerto Rico Government and/or its political subdivisions. Partially offsetting the increase in the originations of $49.6commercial loans was a decrease of $303.3 million for non-performing residential real estatein originations of consumer loans and $7.6of $98.5 million in foreclosed real estate properties; (ii)residential mortgage loan originations adversely affected by weak economic conditions in Puerto Rico. The increase in loan production in 2008, as compared to 2007, was mainly associated with an increase of $45.6 million in non-performing construction and land loans, and (iii) an increase of $48.0 million in commercial loans. All segmentsloan originations and the purchase of thea $218 million auto loan portfolios were impacted by the current economic crisis. On a positive note,portfolio.
Total non-performing consumer assets (including finance leases) remained relatively unchangedas of December 31, 2009 was $1.71 billion compared to December 31, 2007. This portfolio continues to show signs of stability and benefited from changes in underwriting standards implemented in late 2005 and from originations using these new underwriting standards of new consumer loans to replace maturing consumer loans. This portfolio had an average life of approximately four years.
The Corporation may experience additional increases in the volume of its non-performing loan portfolio due to Puerto Rico’s current economic recession. During the third quarter of 2007, the Corporation started a loan loss mitigation program providing homeownership preservation assistance. Since the inception of the program in the third quarter of 2007, the Corporation has completed approximately 367 loan modifications with an outstanding balance of approximately $60.0$637.2 million as of December 31, 2008. Of this amount, $53.2Even though deterioration in credit quality was observed in all of the Corporation’s portfolios, it was more significant in the construction and commercial loan portfolios, which were affected by both the stagnant housing market and further weakening in the economies of the markets served during most of 2009. The increase in non-performing assets was led by an increase of $518.0 million have been outstanding long enough to be considered for interest accrualin non-performing construction loans, of which $32.8$314.1 million is related to the construction loan portfolio in the Puerto Rico portfolio and $205.2 million is related to construction projects in Florida. Other portfolios that experienced a significant growth in credit risk, mainly in Puerto Rico, include: (i) a $183.0 million increase in non-performing commercial and industrial (“C&I) loans, (ii) a $166.7 million increase in non-performing residential mortgage loans, and (ii) a $110.6 million increase in non-performing commercial mortgage loans. Also, during 2009, the Corporation classified as non-performing investment securities with a book value of $64.5 million that were pledged to Lehman Brothers Special Financing, Inc., in connection with several interest rate swap agreements entered into with that institution. Considering that the investment securities have not yet been formally returnedrecovered by the Corporation, despite its efforts, the Corporation decided to accruing status after a sustained period of repayments.classify such investments as non-performing. Refer to the “Risk Management — Non-accruing and Non-performing Assets” section below for additional information with respect to non-performing assets by geographic areas and recent actions taken by the Corporation to reduce its exposure to troubled loans.

5056


CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND PRACTICES
     The accounting principles of the Corporation and the methods of applying these principles conform with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States (“GAAP”) and to general practices within the banking industry.. The Corporation’s critical accounting policies relate to the 1) allowance for loan and lease losses; 2) other-than-temporary impairments; 3) income taxes; 4) classification and related values of investment securities; 5) valuation of financial instruments; 6) derivative financial instruments; and 7) income recognition on loans. These critical accounting policies involve judgments, estimates and assumptions made by management that affect the recorded assets and liabilities and contingent assets and liabilities disclosed as of the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting periods. Actual results could differ from estimates, if different assumptions or conditions prevail. Certain determinations inherently haverequire greater reliance on the use of estimates, assumptions, and judgments and, as such, have a greater possibility of producing results that could be materially different than those originally reported.
          Allowance for Loan and Lease Losses
     The Corporation maintains the allowance for loan and lease losses at a level that management considersconsidered adequate to absorb losses currently inherent in the loan and lease portfolio. The allowance for loan and lease losses provides for probable losses that have been identified with specific valuation allowances for individually evaluated impaired loans and leases portfolio.for probable losses believed to be inherent in the loan portfolio that have not been specifically identified. Internal risk ratings are assigned to each business loan at the time of approval and are subject to subsequent periodic reviews by the Corporation’s senior management. The adequacy of the allowance for loan and lease losses is reviewed on a quarterly basis as part of the Corporation’s continued evaluation of its asset quality. Management allocates specific portions of the allowance for loan and lease losses to problem loans that are identified through an asset classification analysis. The portfolios of residential mortgage loans, consumer loans, auto loans and finance leases are individually considered homogeneous and each portfolio is evaluated in as pools of similar loans for impairment. The adequacy of the allowance for loan and lease losses is based upon a number of factors including historical loan and lease loss experience that may not fully represent current conditions inherent in the portfolio. For example, factors affecting the Puerto Rico, Florida (USA), US Virgin Islands’ or British Virgin Islands’ economies may contribute to delinquencies and defaults above the Corporation’s historical loan and lease losses. The Corporation addresses this risk by actively monitoring the delinquency and default experience and by considering current economic and market conditions and their probable impact on the borrowers. Based on the assessments of current conditions, the Corporation makes appropriate adjustments to the historically developed assumptions when necessary to adjust historical factors to account for present conditions. The Corporation also takes into consideration information about trends on non-accrual loans, delinquencies, changes in underwriting policies and other risk characteristics relevant to the particular loan category.quality
     The Corporation measures impairment individually for those commercial and real estate loans with a principal balance of $1 million or more in accordance with the provisions of SFAS 114, “Accounting by Creditors for Impairment of a Loan” (as amended by SFAS No. 118), and SFAS 5, “Accounting for Contingencies.” A loan is impaired when, based on current information and events, it is probable that the Corporation will be unable to collect all amounts due according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement.     A specific reservevaluation allowance is determinedestablished for those commercial and real estate loans classified as impaired, primarily based on each such loan’swhen the collateral value of the loan (if the impaired loan is determined to be collateral dependent) or the present value of the expected future cash flows discounted at the loan’s effective interest rate. Ifrate is lower than the carrying amount of that loan. To compute the specific valuation allowance, commercial and real estate, including residential mortgage loans with a principal balance of $1 million or more are evaluated individually as well as smaller residential mortgage loans considered impaired based on their high delinquency and loan-to-value levels. When foreclosure is probable, the creditorimpairment is required to measure the impairmentmeasured based on the fair value of the collateral. The fair value of the collateral is generally obtained from appraisals. Updated appraisals are obtained when the Corporation determines that loans are impaired and are updated annually thereafter. In addition, appraisals are also obtained for certain residential mortgage loans on a spot basis selected bybased on specific characteristics such as delinquency levels, age of the appraisal, and loan-to-value ratios. Should there be a deficiency,Deficiencies from the Corporation records a specific allowance for loan losses related to these loans.
     As a general procedure, the Corporation internally reviews appraisals on a spot basis as partexcess of the underwriting and approval process. For constructionrecorded investment in collateral dependent loans related toover the Miami Corporate Banking operations, appraisals are reviewed by an outsourced contracted appraiser. Once a loan backed by real estate collateral deteriorates or is accounted for in non-accrual status, a full assessment of theresulting fair value of the collateral is performed. Ifare charged-off when deemed uncollectible.
     For all other loans, which include, small, homogeneous loans, such as auto loans, consumer loans, finance lease loans, residential mortgages, and commercial and construction loans not considered impaired or in amounts under $1 million, the Corporation commences litigationmaintains a general valuation allowance. The methodology to collect an outstandingcompute the general valuation allowance has not change in the past 2 years. The Corporation updates the factors used to compute the reserve factors on a quarterly basis. The general reserve is primarily determined by applying loss factors according to the loan type and assigned risk category (pass, special mention and substandard not impaired; all doubtful loans are considered impaired). The general reserve for consumer loans is based on factors such as delinquency trends, credit bureau score bands, portfolio type, geographical location, bankruptcy trends, recent market transactions, and other environmental factors such as economic forecasts. The analysis of the residential mortgage pools are performed at the individual loan level and then aggregated to determine the expected loss ratio. The model applies risk-adjusted prepayment curves, default curves, and severity curves to each loan in the pool. The severity is affected by the expected house price scenario based on recent house price trends. Default curves are used in the model to determine expected delinquency levels. The risk-adjusted timing of liquidation and associated costs are used in the model and are risk-adjusted for the area in which the property is located (Puerto Rico, Florida, or commences foreclosure proceedings against a borrower (which includesVirgin Islands). For commercial loans, including construction loans, the collateral), a new appraisal reportgeneral reserve is requested and the book value is adjusted accordingly, either by a corresponding reserve or a charge-off.
     The Credit Risk area requests newbased on historical loss ratios, trends in non-accrual loans, loan type, risk-rating, geographical location, changes in collateral appraisalsvalues for impaired collateral dependent loans. In order to determine present market conditionsloans and gross product or unemployment data for the geographical region. The methodology of accounting for all probable losses in Puerto Ricoloans not individually measured for impairment purposes is made in accordance with authoritative accounting guidance that requires losses be accrued when they are probable of occurring and the Virgin Islands, and to gauge property appreciation rates,estimable.

5157


opinions of value are requested     The blended general reserve factors utilized for a sample of delinquent residential real estate loans. The valuation information gathered through these appraisals is consideredall portfolios increased during 2009 due to the continued deterioration in the Corporation’s allowance model assumptions.
     Cash payments received on impairedeconomy and the continued increase in delinquencies, charge-offs, home values and most other economic indicators utilized. The blended general reserve factor for residential mortgage loans are recordedincreased from 0.43% in accordance with2008 to 0.91% in 2009. For commercial mortgage loans the contractual terms ofblended general reserve factor increased from 0.62% in 2008 to 2.41% in 2009. For C&I loans the loan.blended general reserve factor increased from 1.31% in 2008 to 2.44% in 2009. The principal portion of the payment is usedconstruction loans blended general factor increased from 2.18% in 2008 to reduce the principal balance of the loan, whereas the interest portion is recognized as interest income. However, when management believes the ultimate collectibility of principal is9.82% in doubt, the interest portion is applied2009. The consumer and finance leases reserve factor increased from 4.31% in 2008 to principal.4.36% in 2009.
          Other-than-temporary impairments
     TheOn a quarterly basis, the Corporation evaluates forperforms an assessment to determine whether there have been any events or circumstances indicating that a security with an unrealized loss has suffered an other-than-temporary impairment (“OTTI”). A security is considered impaired if the fair value is less than its debt and equity securities when their fair market value has remained belowamortized cost for six consecutive months or more, or earlier if other factors indicative of potential impairment exist. Investments are considered to be impaired when their cost exceeds fair market value.basis.
     The Corporation evaluates if the impairment is other-than-temporary depending upon whether the portfolio is of fixed income securities or equity securities as further described below. The Corporation employs a systematic methodology that considers all available evidence in evaluating a potential impairment of its investments.
     The impairment analysis of the fixed income investmentssecurities places special emphasis on the analysis of the cash position of the issuer and its cash and capital generation capacity, which could increase or diminish the issuer’s ability to repay its bond obligations.obligations, the length of time and the extent to which the fair value has been less than the amortized cost basis and changes in the near-term prospects of the underlying collateral, if applicable, such as changes in default rates, loss severity given default and significant changes in prepayment assumptions. In light of the current crisis in thevolatile economic and financial markets,market conditions, the Corporation also takes into consideration the latest information available about the overall financial condition of issuers,the issuer, credit ratings, recent legislation and government actions affecting the issuer’s industry and actions taken by the issuersissuer to deal with the present economic climate. In April 2009, the Financial Accounting Standard Board (“FASB”) amended the OTTI model for debt securities. OTTI losses are recognized in earnings if the Corporation has the intent to sell the debt security or it is more likely than not that it will be required to sell the debt security before recovery of its amortized cost basis. However, even if the Corporation does not expect to sell a debt security, expected cash flows to be received are evaluated to determine if a credit loss has occurred. An unrealized loss is generally deemed to be other-than-temporary and a credit loss is deemed to exist if the present value of the expected future cash flows is less than the amortized cost basis of the debt security. The credit loss component of an OTTI is recorded as a component of Net impairment losses on investment securities in the statements of (loss) income, while the remaining portion of the impairment loss is recognized in other comprehensive income, net of taxes. The previous amortized cost basis less the OTTI recognized in earnings is the new amortized cost basis of the investment. The new amortized cost basis is not adjusted for subsequent recoveries in fair value. However, for debt securities for which OTTI was recognized in earnings, the difference between the new amortized cost basis and the cash flows expected to be collected is accreted as interest income.
     Prior to April 1, 2009, an unrealized loss was considered other-than-temporary and recorded in earnings if (i) it was probable that the holder would not collect all amounts due according to contractual terms of the debt security, or (ii) the fair value was below the amortized cost of the security for a prolonged period of time and the Corporation also considers itsdid not have the positive intent and ability to hold the fixed incomesecurity until recovery or maturity.
     The impairment model for equity securities until recovery. If management believes, based onwas not affected by the analysis, that the issuer will not be able to service its debt and pay its obligations in a timely manner, the security is written down to the estimated fair value. For securities written down to their estimated fair value, any accrued and uncollected interest is also reversed. Interest income is then recognized when collected.
aforementioned FASB amendment. The impairment analysis of equity securities is performed and reviewed on an ongoing basis based on the latest financial information and any supporting research report made by a major brokerage firm. This analysis is very subjective and based, among other things, on relevant financial data such as capitalization, cash flow, liquidity, systematic risk, and debt outstanding of the issuer. Management also considers the issuer’s industry trends, the historical performance of the stock, credit ratings as well as the Corporation’s intent to hold the security for an extended period. If management believes there is a low probability of recovering book value in a reasonable time frame, then an impairment will be recorded by writing the security down to market value. As previously mentioned, equity securities are monitored on an ongoing basis but special attention is given to those securities that have experienced a decline in fair value for six months or more. An impairment charge is generally recognized when the fair value of an equity security has remained significantly below cost for a period of twelve consecutive months or more.

58


          Income Taxes
     The Corporation is required to estimate income taxes in preparing its consolidated financial statements. This involves the estimation of current income tax expense together with an assessment of temporary differences resulting from differences in the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities for financial reporting purposes and the amounts used for income tax purposes. The determination of current income tax expense involves estimates and assumptions that require the Corporation to assume certain positions based on its interpretation of current tax regulations. Management assesses the relative benefits and risks of the appropriate tax treatment of transactions, taking into account statutory, judicial and regulatory guidance and recognizes tax benefits only when deemed probable. Changes in assumptions affecting estimates may be required in the future and estimated tax liabilities may need to be increased or decreased accordingly. The accrual of tax contingencies is adjusted in light of changing facts and circumstances, such as the progress of tax audits, case law and emerging legislation. The Corporation’s effective tax rate includes the impact of tax contingencies and changes to such accruals, as considered appropriate by management. When particular matters arise, a number of years may elapse before such matters are audited by the taxing authorities and finally resolved. Favorable resolution of such matters or the expiration of the statute of

52


limitations may result in the release of tax contingencies which are recognized as a reduction to the Corporation’s effective rate in the year of resolution. Unfavorable settlement of any particular issue could increase the effective rate and may require the use of cash in the year of resolution. As of December 31, 2008,2009, there were no open income tax investigations. Information regarding income taxes is included in Note 2527 to the Corporation’s audited financial statements for the year ended December 31, 20082009 included in Item 8 of this Form 10-K.
     The determination of deferred tax expense or benefit is based on changes in the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities that generate temporary differences. The carrying value of the Corporation’s net deferred tax assets assumes that the Corporation will be able to generate sufficient future taxable income based on estimates and assumptions. If these estimates and related assumptions change, the Corporation may be required to record valuation allowances against its deferred tax assets resulting in additional income tax expense in the consolidated statements of income. Management evaluates its deferred tax assets on a quarterly basis and assesses the need for a valuation allowance, if any. A valuation allowance is established when management believes that it is more likely than not that some portion of its deferred tax assets will not be realized. Changes in valuation allowance from period to period are included in the Corporation’s tax provision in the period of change (see Note 2527 to the Corporation’s audited financial statements for the year ended December 31, 20082009 included in Item 8 of this Form 10-K).
     SFAS 109, “AccountingAccounting for Income Taxes requires companies to make adjustments to their financial statements in the quarter that new tax legislation is enacted. In the third quarter of 2005,2009, the Puerto Rico legislature passedGovernment approved Act No. 7 (the “Act”), to stimulate Puerto Rico’s economy and to reduce the governor signed into lawPuerto Rico Government’s fiscal deficit. The Act imposes a series of temporary two-year additionaland permanent measures, including the imposition of a 5% surtax of 2.5%over the total income tax determined, which is applicable to corporations. The surtax was applicable to taxable years after December 31, 2004 and increasedcorporations, among others, whose combined income exceeds $100,000, effectively resulting in an increase in the maximum marginal corporate incomestatutory tax rate from 39% to 41.5% until40.95% and an increase in capital gain statutory tax rate from 15% to 15.75%. This temporary measure is effective for tax years that commenced after December 31, 2006. On May 13, 2006, with an effective date of2008 and before January 1, 2006,2012. Also, under the Government of Puerto Rico signed Law No. 89 which imposed an additional 2.0% incomeAct, all IBEs are subject to the special 5% tax on all companies covered bytheir net income not otherwise subject to tax pursuant to the Puerto Rico Banking Act whichPR Code. This temporary measure is also effective for tax years that commence after December 31, 2008 and before January 1, 2012. The effect of a higher temporary statutory tax rate over the normal statutory tax rate resulted in an additional income tax benefit of $10.4 million for 2009 that was partially offset by an income tax provision of $1.7$6.6 million for 2006.related to the special 5% tax on the operations FirstBank Overseas Corporation. For 2007 and 2008, the maximum marginal corporate income tax rate was 39%.
     The Corporation adopted FIN 48, “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes — an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109,” effective January 1, 2007. FIN 48 clarifies the accounting for uncertainty in income taxes recognized in an enterprise’s financial statements in accordance with SFAS 109. This Interpretationissued authoritative guidance that prescribes a recognition threshold and measurement attributecomprehensive model for the financial statement recognition, measurement, presentation and measurementdisclosure of aincome tax positionuncertainties with respect to positions taken or expected to be taken inon income tax returns. Under the authoritative accounting guidance, income tax benefits are recognized and measured upon a two-step model: 1) a tax return. This Interpretation also provides guidanceposition must be more likely than not to be sustained based solely on derecognition, classification, interestits technical merits in order to be recognized, and penalties, accounting2) the benefit is measured as the largest dollar amount of that position that is more likely than not to be sustained upon settlement. The difference between the benefit recognized in interim periods, disclosure,accordance with this model and transition.the tax benefit claimed on a tax return is referred to as an Unrecognized Tax Benefit (“UTB”). The Corporation classifies interest and penalties, if any, related to unrecognized tax portionsUTBs as

59


components of income tax expense. Refer to Note 2527 of the Corporation’s audited financial statements for the year ended December 31, 20082009 included in Item 8 of this Form 10-K for required disclosures and further information related to this accounting pronouncement.guidance.

60


        Investment Securities Classification and Related Values
     Management determines the appropriate classification of debt and equity securities at the time of purchase. Debt securities are classified as held-to-maturity when the Corporation has the intent and ability to hold the securities to maturity. Held-to-maturity (“HTM”) securities are stated at amortized cost. Debt and equity securities are classified as trading when the Corporation has the intent to sell the securities in the near term. Debt and equity securities classified as trading securities are reported at fair value, with unrealized gains and losses included in earnings. Debt and equity securities not classified as HTM or trading, except for equity securities that do not have readily available fair values, are classified as available-for-sale (“AFS”). AFS securities are reported at fair value, with unrealized gains and losses excluded from earnings and reported net of deferred taxes in accumulated other comprehensive income (a component of stockholders’ equity). and do not affect earnings until realized or are deemed to be other-than-temporarily impaired. Investments in equity securities that do not have publicly and readily determinable fair values are classified as other equity securities in the statement of financial condition and carried at the lower of cost or realizable value. The assessmentdetermination of fair value applies to certain of the Corporation’s assets and liabilities, including the investment portfolio. Fair values are volatile and are affected by factors such as market interest rates, prepayment speeds and discount rates.

53


          Valuation of financial instruments
     The measurement of fair value is fundamental to the Corporation’s presentation of its financial condition and results of operations. The Corporation holds fixed income and equity securities, derivatives, investments and other financial instruments at fair value. The Corporation holds its investments and liabilities on the statement of financial condition mainly to manage liquidity needs and interest rate risks. A substantial part of these assets and liabilities is reflected at fair value on the Corporation’s financial statement of condition.statements.
     Effective January 1, 2007,The Corporation adopted authoritative guidance issued by the Corporation elected to early adopt SFAS 157, “Fair Value Measurements.” This StatementFASB for fair value measurements which defines fair value as the exchange price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date. SFAS 157This guidance also establishes a fair value hierarchy whichthat requires an entity to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value. The standard describes threeThree levels of inputs that may be used to measure fair value:
   
Level 1
 Inputs are quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that the reporting entity has the ability to access at the measurement date.
   
Level 2
 Inputs other than quoted prices included within Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly, such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities; quoted prices in markets that are not active; or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of the assets or liabilities.
   
Level 3
 Valuations are observed from unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and that are significant to the fair value of the assets or liabilities.
     The following is a description of the valuation methodologies used for instruments measured at fair value:
     Callable Brokered CDs (Level 2 inputs)
     The fair value of callable brokered CDs, which are included within deposits and elected to be measured at fair value, under SFAS 159, is determined using discounted cash flow analyses over the full term of the CDs. The valuation uses a “Hull-White Interest Rate Tree” approach for the CDs with callable option components, an industry-standard approach for valuing instruments with interest rate call options. The model assumes that the embedded options are exercised economically. The fair value of the CDs is computed using the outstanding principal amount. The discount rates used are based on US dollar LIBOR and swap rates. At-the-money implied swaption volatility term structure (volatility by time to maturity) is used to calibrate the model to current market prices and value the cancellation option in the deposits. The fair value does not incorporate the risk of nonperformance, since the callable brokered

61


CDs are generally participated out by brokers in shares of less than $100,000 and therefore, insured by the FDIC. As of December 31, 2009, there were no callable brokered CDs outstanding measured at fair value since they were all called during 2009.
     Medium-Term Notes (Level 2 inputs)
     The fair value of medium-term notes is determined using a discounted cash flow analysis over the full term of the borrowings. This valuation also uses the “Hull-White Interest Rate Tree” approach to value the option components of the term notes. The model assumes that the embedded options are exercised economically. The fair value of medium-term notes is computed using the notional amount outstanding. The discount rates used in the valuations are based on US dollar LIBOR and swap rates. At-the-money implied swaption volatility term structure (volatility by time to maturity) is used to calibrate the model to current market prices and value the cancellation option in the term notes. Effective January 1, 2007, the Corporation updated its methodology to calculate the impact of its own credit standing as required by SFAS 157. For the medium-term notes, the credit risk is measured using the difference in yield curves between swap rates and a yield curve that considers the industry and credit rating of the Corporation as issuer of the note at a tenor comparable to the time to maturity of the note and option.

54


     Investment Securities
     The fair value of investment securities is the market value based on quoted market prices, when available, or market prices for identical or comparable assets that are based on observable market parameters including benchmark yields, reported trades, quotes from brokers or dealers, issuer spreads, bids offers and reference data including market research operations. Observable prices in the market already consider the risk of nonperformance. If listed prices or quotes are not available, fair value is based upon models that use unobservable inputs due to the limited market activity of the instrument (Level 3), as is the case with certain private label mortgage-backed securities held by the Corporation. Unlike U.S. agency mortgage-backed securities, the fair value of these private label securities cannot be readily determined because they are not actively traded in securities markets. Significant inputs used for fair value determination consist of specific characteristics such as information used in the prepayment model, which follows the amortizing schedule of the underlying loans, which is an unobservable input.
     Private label mortgage-backed securities are collateralized by fixed-rate mortgages on single-family residential properties in the United States and the interest rate is variable, tied to 3-month LIBOR and limited to the weighted-average coupon of the underlying collateral. The market valuation is derived from a model and represents the estimated net cash flows over the projected life of the pool of underlying assets applying a discount rate that reflects market observed floating spreads over LIBOR, with a widening spread bias on a non-rated security. The model usessecurity and utilizes relevant assumptions such as prepayment rate, default rate, and interest rate assumptions that market participants would commonly use for similar mortgage asset classes that are subject to prepayment, credit and interest rate risk.loss severity on a loan level basis. The Corporation modeled the cash flow from the fixed-rate mortgage collateral using a static cash flow analysis according to collateral attributes of the underlying mortgage pool (i.e. loan term, current balance, note rate, rate adjustment type, rate adjustment frequency, rate caps, others) in combination with prepayment forecasts obtained from a commercially available prepayment model (ADCO) and the. The variable cash flow of the security is modeled using the 3-month LIBOR forward curve. The expected foreclosure frequency estimates used inLoss assumptions were driven by the model are based on the 100% Public Securities Association (PSA) Standard Default Assumption (SDA) with acombination of default and loss severity assumption of 10% afterestimates, taking into consideration that the issuer must cover losses upaccount loan credit characteristics (loan-to-value, state, origination date, property type, occupancy loan purpose, documentation type, debt-to-income ratio, other) to 10%provide an estimate of default and loss severity. Refer to Note 4 of the aggregate outstanding balance according to recourse provisions.Corporation’s financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2009 included in Item 8 of this Form 10-K for additional information.
     Derivative Instruments
     The fair value of most of the derivative instruments is based on observable market parameters and takes into consideration the credit risk component of paying counterparts when appropriate.appropriate, except when collateral is pledged. That is, on interest rate swaps, the credit risk of both counterparts is included in the valuation; and on options and caps, only the seller’s credit risk is considered. The “Hull-White Interest Rate Tree” approach is used to value the option components of derivative instruments, and discounting of the cash flows is performed using USDUS dollar LIBOR-based discount rates or yield curves that account for the industry sector and the credit rating of the counterparty and/or the Corporation. Derivatives are mainly composed ofinclude interest rate swaps used for protection against rising interest rates and, prior to June 30, 2009, included interest rate swaps to economically hedge brokered CDs and medium-term notes. For these interest rate swaps, a credit component is not considered in the valuation since the

62


Corporation fully collateralizes with investment securities any mark-to-market loss with the counterparty and, if there are market gains, the counterparty must deliver collateral to the Corporation.
     Certain derivatives with limited market activity, as is the case with derivative instruments named as “reference caps”,caps,” are valued using models that consider unobservable market parameters (Level 3). Reference caps are used mainly to mainly hedge interest rate risk inherent in private label mortgage-backed securities, thus are tied to the notional amount of the underlying fixed-rate mortgage loans originated in the United States. Significant inputs used for fair value determination consist of specific characteristics such as information used in the prepayment model which follows the amortizing schedule of the underlying loans, which is an unobservable input. The valuation model uses the Black formula, which is a benchmark standard in the financial industry. The Black formula is similar to the Black-Scholes formula for valuing stock options except that the spot price of the underlying is replaced by the forward price. The Black formula uses as inputs the strike price of the cap, forward LIBOR rates, volatility estimates and discount rates to estimate the option value. LIBOR rates and swap rates are obtained from Bloomberg L.P. (“Bloomberg”) every day and build zero coupon curve based on the Bloomberg LIBOR/Swap curve. The discount factor is then calculated from the zero coupon curve. The cap is the sum of all caplets. For each caplet, the rate is reset at the beginning of each reporting period and payments are made at the end of each period. The cash flow of caplet is then discounted from each payment date.

55


       Derivative Financial Instruments
     As part of the Corporation’s overall interest rate risk management, the Corporation utilizes derivative instruments, including interest rate swaps, interest rate caps and options to manage interest rate risk. In accordance with SFAS 133, “Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities,” allAll derivative instruments are measured and recognized on the Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition at their fair value. On the date the derivative instrument contract is entered into, the Corporation may designate the derivative as (1) a hedge of the fair value of a recognized asset or liability or of an unrecognized firm commitment (“fair value” hedge), (2) a hedge of a forecasted transaction or of the variability of cash flows to be received or paid related to a recognized asset or liability (“cash flow” hedge) or (3) as a “standalone” derivative instrument, including economic hedges that the Corporation has not formally documented as a fair value or cash flow hedge. Changes in the fair value of a derivative instrument that is highly effective and that is designated and qualifies as a fair-value hedge, along with changes in the fair value of the hedged asset or liability that is attributable to the hedged risk (including gains or losses on firm commitments), are recorded in current-period earnings as interest income or interest expense depending upon whether an asset or liability is being hedged. Similarly, the changes in the fair value of standalone derivative instruments or derivatives not qualifying or designated for hedge accounting under SFAS 133 are reported in current-period earnings as interest income or interest expense depending upon whether an asset or liability is being economically hedged. Changes in the fair value of a derivative instrument that is highly effective and that is designated and qualifies as a cash-flow hedge, if any, are recorded in other comprehensive income in the stockholders’ equity section of the Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition until earnings are affected by the variability of cash flows (e.g., when periodic settlements on a variable-rate asset or liability are recorded in earnings). NoneAs of December 31, 2009 and 2008, all derivatives held by the Corporation’s derivative instruments qualifiedCorporation were considered economic undesignated hedges recorded at fair value with the resulting gain or have been designated as a cash flow hedge.loss recognized in current period earnings.
     Prior to entering into an accounting hedge transaction or designating a hedge, the Corporation formally documents the relationship between the hedging instrument and the hedged item, as well as the risk management objective and strategy for undertaking the hedge transaction. This process includes linking all derivative instruments that are designated as fair value or cash flow hedges, if any, to specific assets and liabilities on the statements of financial condition or to specific firm commitments or forecasted transactions along with a formal assessment at both inception of the hedge and on an ongoing basis as to the effectiveness of the derivative instrument in offsetting changes in fair values or cash flows of the hedged item. The Corporation discontinues hedge accounting prospectively when it determines that the derivative is not effective or will no longer be effective in offsetting changes in the fair value or cash flows of the hedged item, the derivative expires, is sold, or terminated, or management determines that designation of the derivative as a hedging instrument is no longer appropriate. When a fair value hedge is discontinued, the hedged asset or liability is no longer adjusted for changes in fair value and the existing basis adjustment is amortized or accreted over the remaining life of the asset or liability as a yield adjustment.

63


The Corporation recognizes unrealized gains and losses arising from any changes in fair value of derivative instruments and hedged items, as applicable, as interest income or interest expense depending upon whether an asset or liability is being hedged.
The Corporation occasionally purchases or originates financial instruments that contain embedded derivatives. At inception of the financial instrument, the Corporation assesses: (1) if the economic characteristics of the embedded derivative are clearly and closely related to the economic characteristics of the financial instrument (host contract), (2) if the financial instrument that embodies both the embedded derivative and the host contract is measured at fair value with changes in fair value reported in earnings, or (3) if a separate instrument with the same terms as the embedded instrument would not meet the definition of a derivative. If the embedded derivative does not meet any of these conditions, it is separated from the host contract and carried at fair value with changes recorded in current period earnings as part of net interest income. Information regarding derivative instruments is included in Note 30 to the Corporation’s audited financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2008 included in Item 8 of this Form 10-K.
     Effective January 1, 2007, the Corporation elected to early adopt SFAS 159. This Statementauthoritative guidance issued by the FASB that allows entities to choose to measure certain financial assets and liabilities at fair value with any changes in fair value reflected in

56


earnings. The Corporation adopted the fair value option may be applied on an instrument-by-instrument basis. The Corporation adopted SFAS 159 for callable fixedfixed-rate medium-term notes and callable brokered CDs (“SFAS 159 liabilities”),certificates of deposit that were hedged with interest rate swaps. From April 3, 2006 to the adoption of SFAS 159, First BanCorp was following the long-haul method of accounting under SFAS 133 for the portfolio of callable interest rate swaps, callable brokered CDs and callable notes. One of the main considerations in the determination to early adopt SFAS 159the fair value option for these instruments was to eliminate the operational procedures required by the long-haul method of accounting in terms of documentation, effectiveness assessment, and manual procedures followed by the Corporation to fulfill the requirements specified by SFAS 133.authoritative guidance issued by the FASB for derivative instruments designated as fair value hedges.
     With the Corporation’s elimination of the use of the long-haul method in connection with the adoption of SFAS 159,the fair value option, the Corporation no longer amortizes or accretes the basis adjustment for the SFAS 159 liabilities.financial liabilities elected to be measured at fair value. The basis adjustment amortization or accretion is the reversal of the basis differential between the market value and book value recognized at the inception of fair value hedge accounting as well as the change in value of the hedged brokered CDs and medium-term notes recognized since the implementation of the long-haul method. Since the time the Corporation implemented the long-haul method, it had recognized changes in the value of the hedged brokered CDs and medium-term notes based on the expected call date of the instruments. The adoption of SFAS 159the fair value option also requiresrequired the recognition, as part of the initial adoption adjustment to retained earnings, of all of the unamortized placement fees that were paid to broker counterparties upon the issuance of the elected brokered CDs and medium-term notes. The Corporation previously amortized those fees through earnings based on the expected call date of the instruments. SFAS 159The option of using fair value accounting also establishesrequires that the accrued interest should be reported as part of the fair value of the financial instruments elected to be measured at fair value. Refer to Note 27 to the Corporation’s audited financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2008 included in Item 8 of this Form 10-K.
     Prior to the implementation of the long-haul method First BanCorp reflected changes in the fair value of those swaps as well as swaps related to certain loans as non-hedging instruments through operations as part of net interest income.
       Income Recognition on Loans
     Loans are stated at the principal outstanding balance, net of unearned interest, unamortized deferred origination fees and costs and unamortized premiums and discounts. Fees collected and costs incurred in the origination of new loans are deferred and amortized using the interest method or a method which approximates the interest method over the term of the loan as an adjustment to interest yield. Unearned interest on certain personal, auto loans and finance leases is recognized as income under a method which approximates the interest method. When a loan is paid off or sold, any unamortized net deferred fee (cost) is credited (charged) to income.
     Loans on which the recognition of interest income has been discontinued are designated as non-accruing. When loans are placed on non-accruing status, any accrued but uncollected interest income is reversed and charged against interest income. Consumer, construction, commercial and mortgage loans are classified as non-accruing when interest and principal have not been received for a period of 90 days or more. This policymore or when there are doubts about the potential to collect all of the principal based on collateral deficiencies or, in other situations, when collection of all of the principal or interest is alsonot expected due to deterioration in the financial condition of the borrower. Interest income on non-accruing loans is recognized only to the extent it is received in cash. However, where there is doubt regarding the ultimate collectability of loan principal, all cash thereafter received is applied to all impairedreduce the carrying value of such loans based upon an evaluation(i.e., the cost recovery method). Loans are restored to accrual status only when future payments of the risk characteristics of said loans, loss experience, economic conditionsinterest and other pertinent factors.principal are reasonably assured.
     Loan and lease losses are charged and recoveries are credited to the allowance for loan and lease losses. Closed-end personal consumer loans and leases are charged-off when payments are 120 days in arrears. Collateralized auto and finance leases are reserved at 120 days delinquent and charged-off to their estimated net realizable value when collateral deficiency is deemed uncollectible (i.e. when foreclosure is probable). Open-end (revolving credit) consumer loans are charged-off when payments are 180 days in arrears.

64


     A loan is considered impaired when, based upon current information and events, it is probable that the Corporation will be unable to collect all amounts due (including principal and interest) according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement. The Corporation may also classifymeasures impairment individually for those commercial and construction loans in non-accruing status and recognize revenue only when cash payments are received becausewith a principal balance of $1 million or more, including loans for which a charge-off has been recorded based upon the fair value of the deteriorationunderlying collateral, and also evaluates for impairment purposes certain residential mortgage loans with high delinquency and loan-to-value levels. Interest income on impaired loans is recognized based on the Corporation’s policy for recognizing interest on accrual and non-accrual loans. Impaired loans also include loans that have been modified in troubled debt restructurings as a concession to borrowers experiencing financial difficulties. Troubled debt restructurings typically result from the financial condition of the borrower and payment in full of principal or interest is not expected. In addition, during the third quarter of 2007, the Corporation started a loanCorporation’s loss mitigation program providing homeownership preservation assistance. Loans modified through this programactivities or programs sponsored by the Federal Government and could include rate reductions, principal forgiveness, forbearance and other actions intended to minimize the economic loss and to avoid foreclosure or repossession of collateral. Troubled debt restructurings are generally reported as non-performing loans and interestrestored to accrual status when there is recognized on a cash basis. When there is reasonable assurance of repayment and the borrower has made payments over a sustained period, generally six months. However, a loan that has been formally restructured as to be reasonably assured of repayment and of performance according to its modified terms is not placed in non-accruing status, provided the loanrestructuring is returnedsupported by a current, well documented credit evaluation of the borrower’s financial condition taking into consideration sustained historical payment performance for a reasonable time prior to accruing status.the restructuring.

57


Recent Accounting Pronouncements
     The Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) and the Securities Exchange Commission (“SEC”)FASB have issued the following accounting pronouncements and guidance relevant to the Corporation’s operations:
     In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS 160, “Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements — an amendment of ARB No. 51.” This Statement amends ARB 51 to establish accounting and reporting standards for the noncontrolling interest in a subsidiary and for the deconsolidation of a subsidiary. It clarifies that a noncontrolling interest in a subsidiary is an ownership interest in the consolidated entity that should be reported as equity in the consolidated financial statements. It requires consolidated net income to be reported at amounts that include the amounts attributable to both the parent and the noncontrolling interest. It also requires disclosure, on the face of the consolidated statement of income, of the amounts of consolidated net income attributable to the parent and to the noncontrolling interest. This Statement is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning on or after December 15, 2008 (that is, January 1, 2009, for entities with calendar year-ends). Earlier adoption is prohibited. The adoption of this statement did not have an impact on the Corporation’s financial statements, when adopted on January 1, 2009.
     In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS 141R, “Business Combinations.” This Statement retains the fundamental requirements in Statement 141 that the acquisition method of accounting (which Statement 141 called the purchase method) be used for all business combinations and for an acquirer to be identified for each business combination. This Statement defines the acquirer as the entity that obtains control of one or more businesses in the business combination and establishes the acquisition date as the date that the acquirer achieves control. This Statement requires an acquirer to recognize the assets acquired, the liabilities assumed and any noncontrolling interest in the acquiree at the acquisition date, measured at their fair values as of that date, with limited exceptions specified in the Statement. This Statement applies prospectively to business combinations for which the acquisition date is on or after the beginning of the first annual reporting period beginning on or after December 15, 2008. An entity may not apply it before that date. The adoption of this statement did not have an impact on the Corporation’s financial statements, when adopted on January 1, 2009.
     In March 2008, the FASB issued SFAS 161, “Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities – an amendment of FASB Statement No. 133.” This Statement changes the disclosure requirements for derivative instruments and hedging activities. Entities are required to provide enhanced disclosures about (a) how derivative instruments and related hedged items are accounted for under SFAS 133 and its related interpretations, and (b) how derivative instruments and related hedged items affect an entity’s financial position, financial performance, and cash flows. This Statement is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after November 15, 2008, with early application encouraged. The Corporation adopted the disclosure framework dictated by this Statement during 2008. Required disclosures are included in Note 30 of the Corporation’s audited financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2008 included in Item 8 of this Form 10-K
     In May 2008, the FASB issued SFAS 162, “The Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles.” This Statement identifies the sources of accounting principles and the framework for selecting the principles to be used in the preparation ofauthoritative guidance on financial statements of nongovernmental entities that are presented in conformity with GAAP. Prior to the issuance of SFAS 162, GAAP hierarchy was defined in the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA) Statement on Auditing Standards No. (“SAS”) 69, “The Meaning of Present Fairly in Conformity With Generally Accepted Accounting Principles.” SFAS 162 obviates the need for the guidance applicable to auditors in SAS 69 by identifying the GAAP hierarchy for entities, since entities rather than auditors are responsible for selecting accounting principles for financial statements that are presented in conformity with GAAP. Any effect of applying the provisions of SFAS 162 should be reported as a change in accounting principle in accordance with SFAS 154, “Accounting Changes and Error Corrections.” SFAS 162 is effective 60 days following the SEC approval of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board’s amendments to AU Section 411, “The Meaning of Present Fairly in Conformity With Generally Accepted Accounting Principles,” which the SEC approved on September 16, 2008. The adoption of SFAS 162 did not impact the Corporation’s current accounting policies or the Corporation’s financial results.

58


     In May 2008, the FASB issued Staff Position No. (“FSP”) APB 14-1 (“FSP–APB 14-1”). FSP-APB 14-1 clarifies that convertible debt instruments that may be settled in cash upon conversion (including partial cash settlement) are not addressed by paragraph 12 of APB Opinion No. 14, “Accounting for Convertible Debt and Debt Issued with Stock Purchase Warrants.” Additionally, FSP-APB 14-1 specifies that issuers of such instruments should separately account for the liability and equity components in a manner that will reflect the entity’s nonconvertible debt borrowing rate when interest cost is recognized in subsequent periods. FSP-APB 14-1 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008, and interim periods within those fiscal years. As of December 31, 2008, the Corporation does not have any convertible debt instrument.
     In May 2008, the FASB issued SFAS 163, “Accounting for Financial Guarantee Insurance Contracts – an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 60.” This Statement requiresguarantee insurance contracts requiring that an insurance enterprise recognize a claim liability prior to an event of default (insured event) when there is evidence that credit deterioration has occurred in an insured financial obligation. This Statementguidance also clarifies how SFAS 60the accounting and reporting by insurance entities applies to financial guarantee insurance contracts, including the recognition and measurement to be used to account for premium revenue and claim liabilities. SFAS 163FASB authoritative guidance on the accounting for financial guarantee insurance contracts is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008, and all interim periods within those fiscal years, except for some disclosures about the insurance enterprise’s risk-management activities. Except for those disclosures, earlier applicationactivities which are effective since the first interim period after the issuance of SFAS 163 is not permitted.this guidance. The Corporation is currently evaluating the possible effect, if any, of the adoption of this statementguidance did not have a significant impact on itsthe Corporation’s financial statements, commencing on January 1, 2009.statements.
     In June 2008, the FASB issued FSP No. EITF 03-6-1 (“FSP EITF 03-6-1”), “Determining Whether Instruments Grantedauthoritative guidance for determining whether instruments granted in Share-Based Payment Transactions Are Participating Securities.” FSP EITF 03-6-1shared-based payment transactions are participating securities. This guidance applies to entities with outstanding unvested share-based payment awards that contain rights to nonforfeitable dividends. Furthermore, awards with dividends that do not need to be returned to the entity if the employee forfeits the award are considered participating securities. Accordingly, under FSP EITF 03-6-1this guidance unvested share-based payment awards that are considered to be participating securities shouldmust be included in the computation of EPSearnings per share (“EPS”) pursuant to the two-class method under SFAS 128. FSP EITF 03-6-1as required by FASB guidance on earnings per share. FASB guidance on determining whether instruments granted in share based payment transactions are participating securities is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008, and interim periods within those years. Early application isThe adoption of this Statement did not permitted. The Corporation is currently evaluating this statement in light ofhave an impact on the recently approved Omnibus Incentive Plan, however,Corporation’s financial statements since, as of December 31, 2008,2009, the outstanding unvested shares of restricted stock do not contain rights to nonforfeitable dividends.
     In September 2008,April 2009, the FASB issued FSP No. FAS 133-1authoritative guidance for the accounting of assets acquired and FIN 45-4 (“FSP FAS 133-1liabilities assumed in a business combination that arise from contingencies. This guidance amends the provisions related to the initial recognition and FIN 45-4”), “Disclosures about Credit Derivativesmeasurement, subsequent measurement and Certain Guarantees: An Amendmentdisclosure of assets and liabilities arising from contingencies in a business combination. The guidance carries forward the requirement that acquired contingencies in a business combination be recognized at fair value on the acquisition date if fair value can be reasonably estimated during the allocation period. Otherwise, entities would typically account for the acquired contingencies based on a reasonable estimate in accordance with FASB Statement No. 133 and FASB Interpretation No. 45; and Clarificationguidance on the accounting for contingencies. This guidance is effective for assets or liabilities arising from contingencies in business combinations for which the

65


acquisition date is on or after the beginning of the Effective Date of FASB Statement No. 161.” FSP FAS 133-1 and FIN 45-4 amends SFAS 133 to require disclosures by sellers of credit derivatives, including credit derivatives embedded in a hybrid instrument. A seller of credit derivatives must disclose information about its credit derivatives and hybrid instruments that have embedded credit derivatives to enable users of financial statements to assess their potential effect on its financial position, financial performance, and cash flows. As of December 31, 2008, the Corporation is not involved in the credit derivatives market. This FSP also amends FIN 45, “Guarantor’s Accounting and Disclosure Requirements for Guarantees, Including Indirect Guarantees of Indebtedness of Others,” to require an additional disclosure about the current status of the payment/performance risk of a guarantee. Further, this FSP clarifies the FASB’s intent about the effective date of SFAS 161. This FSP clarifies the FASB’s intent that the disclosures required by SFAS 161 should be provided for anyfirst annual reporting period (annualbeginning on or quarterly interim) beginning after November 15, 2008. The provisions of this FSP that amend SFAS 133 and FIN 45 will be effective for reporting periods (annual or interim) ending after NovemberDecember 15, 2008. The adoption of this pronouncementStatement did not have a significantan impact on the Corporation’s financial statements.
     In October 2008,April 2009, the FASB issued FSP No. FAS 157-3 (“FSP FAS 157-3”), “Determiningauthoritative guidance for determining fair value when the Fair Valuevolume and level of a Financial Asset Whenactivity for the Market for That Asset Is Not Active.” FSP FAS 157-3 clarifiesasset or liability have significantly decreased and identifying transactions that are not orderly. This guidance relates to determining fair values when there is no active market or where the applicationprice inputs being used represent distressed sales. It reaffirms the objective of SFAS 157 in a marketfair value measurement, that is, notto reflect how much an asset would be sold for in an orderly transaction (as opposed to a distressed or forced transaction) at the date of the financial statements under current market conditions. Specifically, it reaffirms the need to use judgment to ascertain if a formerly active market has become inactive and provides an example to illustrate key considerations in determining the fair value ofvalues when markets have become inactive. This guidance is effective for interim and annual reporting periods ending after June 15, 2009 on a financial asset when the market for that financial asset is not active. This FSP became effective on October 10, 2008 and also applies to prior periods for which financial statements have not been issued.prospective basis. The adoption of this pronouncementStatement did not impact the Corporation’s fair value methodologies on its financial assets.

59


     In December 2008, the FASB issued FSP No. FAS 140-4 and FIN 46(R)-8, “Disclosures by Public Entities (Enterprises) about Transfers of Financial Assets and Interests in Variable Interest Entities.” This FSP amends SFAS 140, to require public entities to provide additional disclosures about transfers of financial assets. It also amends FIN 46 (revised December 2003), “Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities,” to require public enterprises, including sponsors that have a variable interest in a variable interest entity, to provide additional disclosures about their involvement with variable interest entities. Additionally, this FSP requires certain disclosures to be provided by a public enterprise that is (a) a sponsor of a qualifying special purpose entity (“SPE”) that holds a variable interest in the qualifying SPE but was not the transferor (nontransferor) of financial assets to the qualifying SPE and (b) a servicer of a qualifying SPE that holds a significant variable interest in the qualifying SPE but was not the transferor (nontransferor) of financial assets to the qualifying SPE. The disclosures required by this FSP are intended to provide greater transparency to financial statement users about a transferor’s continuing involvement with transferred financial assets and an enterprise’s involvement with variable interest entities and qualifying SPEs. This FSP became effective for the first reporting period (interim or annual) ending after December 15, 2008, with earlier application encouraged. This FSP shall apply for each annual and interim reporting period thereafter. The adoption of this Statement did not have a significant impact on the Corporation’s financial statements as the Corporation is not materially involve in the transfer of financial assets through securitization and asset-backed financing arrangements, nor have involvement with variable interest entities.liabilities.
     In JanuaryApril 2009, the FASB issued FSP No. EITF 99-20-1 (“FSP EITF 99-20-1”), “Amendments toamended the Impairment Guidance of EITF Issue No. 99-20.” This FSP amends the impairmentexisting guidance in EITF Issue No. 99-20, “Recognition of Interest Income and Impairment on Purchased Beneficial Interests and Beneficial Interests That Continue to Be Held by a Transferor in Securitized Financial Assets,” to achieve more consistent determination ofdetermining whether an other-than-temporary impairment has occurred. The FSP also retainsfor investments in debt securities is OTTI and emphasizesrequires an entity to recognize the objectivecredit component of an other-than-temporary impairment assessmentOTTI of a debt security in earnings and the related disclosure requirementsnoncredit component in SFAS 115, “Accounting for Certain Investments in Debtother comprehensive income (“OCI”) when the entity does not intend to sell the security and Equity Securities,”it is more likely than not that the entity will not be required to sell the security prior to recovery. This guidance also requires expanded disclosures and other related guidance. The FSP became effective for interim and annual reporting periods ending after June 15, 2009. In connection with this guidance, the Corporation recorded $1.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2009 of OTTI charges through earnings that represents the credit loss of available-for-sale private label mortgage-backed securities. This guidance does not amend existing recognition and measurement guidance related to an OTTI of equity securities. The expanded disclosures related to this new guidance are included inNote 4of the Corporation’s financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2009 included in Item 8 of this Form 10-K.
     In April 2009, the FASB amended the existing guidance on the disclosure about fair values of financial instruments, which requires entities to disclose the method(s) and significant assumptions used to estimate the fair value of financial instruments, in both interim financial statements as well as annual financial statements. This guidance became effective for interim reporting periods ending after June 15, 2008,2009. The adoption of the amended guidance expanded the Corporation’s interim financial statement disclosures with regard to the fair value of financial instruments.
     In May 2009, the FASB issued authoritative guidance on subsequent events, which establishes general standards of accounting for and mustdisclosure of events that occur after the balance sheet date but before financial statements are issued or are available to be applied prospectively. Retrospective application toissued. This guidance sets forth (i) the period after the balance sheet date during which management of a priorreporting entity should evaluate events or transactions that may occur for potential recognition or disclosure in the financial statements, (ii) the circumstances under which an entity should recognize events or transactions occurring after the balance sheet date in its financial statements and (iii) the disclosures that an entity should make about events or transactions that occurred after the balance sheet date. This guidance is effective for interim or annual financial periods ending after June 15, 2009. There are not any material subsequent event that would require further disclosure.
     In June 2009, the FASB amended the existing guidance on the accounting for transfers of financial assets, which improves the relevance, representational faithfulness, and comparability of the information that a reporting entity provides in its financial statements about a transfer of financial assets; the effects of a transfer on its financial position, financial performance, and cash flows; and a transferor’s continuing involvement, if any, in transferred financial assets. This guidance is effective as of the beginning of each reporting entity’s first annual reporting period that begins after November 15, 2009, for interim periods within that first annual reporting period and for interim and annual reporting periods thereafter. Subsequently in December 2009, the FASB amended the existing guidance issued in June 2009. Among the most significant changes and additions to this guidance includes changes to the conditions for sales of a financial assets which objective is to determine whether a transferor and its consolidated affiliates included in the financial statements have surrendered control over transferred financial assets or third-party beneficial interests; and the addition of the meaning of the term participating interest which represents a proportionate (pro rata) ownership interest in an entire financial asset. The Corporation is evaluating the impact the adoption of the guidance will have on its financial statements.

66


     In June 2009, the FASB amended the existing guidance on the consolidation of variable interest, which improves financial reporting by enterprises involved with variable interest entities and addresses (i) the effects on certain provisions of the amended guidance, as a result of the elimination of the qualifying special-purpose entity concept in the accounting for transfer of financial assets guidance and (ii) constituent concerns about the application of certain key provisions of the guidance, including those in which the accounting and disclosures do not always provide timely and useful information about an enterprise’s involvement in a variable interest entity. This guidance is effective as of the beginning of each reporting entity’s first annual reporting period that begins after November 15, 2009, for interim periods within that first annual reporting period, and for interim and annual reporting periods thereafter. Subsequently in December 2009, the FASB amended the existing guidance issued in June 2009. Among the most significant changes and additions to this guidance includes the replacement of the quantitative-based risks and rewards calculation for determining which reporting entity, if any, has a controlling financial interest in a variable interest entity with an approach focused on identifying which reporting entity has the power to direct the activities of a variable interest entity that most significantly impact the entity’s economic performance and the obligation to absorb losses of the entity or the right to receive benefits from the entity. The Corporation is evaluating the impact, if any, the adoption of this guidance will have on its financial statements.
     In June 2009, the FASB issued authoritative guidance on the FASB Accounting Standards Codification and the Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles. The FASB Accounting Standards Codification (“Codification”) is the single source of authoritative nongovernmental GAAP. Rules and interpretive releases of the SEC under the authority of federal securities laws are also sources of authoritative GAAP for SEC registrants. The Codification project does not change GAAP in any way shape or form; it only reorganizes the existing pronouncements into one single source of U.S. GAAP. This guidance is effective for interim and annual periods ending after September 15, 2009. All existing accounting standards are superseded as described in this guidance. All other accounting literature not included in the Codification is nonauthoritative. Following this guidance, the FASB will not issue new guidance in the form of Statements, FASB Staff Positions, or Emerging Issues Task Force Abstracts. Instead, it will issue Accounting Standards Updates (“ASUs”). The FASB will not consider ASUs as authoritative in their own right. ASUs will serve only to update the Codification, provide background information about the guidance, and provide the bases for conclusions on the change(s) in the Codification.
     In August 2009, the FASB updated the Codification in connection with the fair value measurement of liabilities to clarify that in circumstances in which a quoted price in an active market for the identical liability is not permitted.available, a reporting entity is required to measure fair value using one or more of the following techniques:
1.A valuation technique that uses:
a.The quoted price of the identical liability when traded as an asset
b.Quoted prices for similar liabilities or similar liabilities when traded as assets
2.Another valuation technique that is consistent with the principles of fair value measurement. Two examples would be an income approach, such as a present value technique, or a market approach, such as a technique that is based on the amount at the measurement date that the reporting entity would pay to transfer the identical liability or would receive to enter into the identical liability.
     The update also clarifies that when estimating the fair value of a liability, a reporting entity is not required to include a separate input or adjustment to other inputs relating to the existence of a restriction that prevents the transfer of the liability. The update also clarifies that both a quoted price in an active market for the identical liability at the measurement date and the quoted price for the identical liability when traded as an asset in an active market when no adjustment to the quoted price of the asset are required are Level 1 fair value measurements. This update is effective for the first reporting period (including interim periods) beginning after issuance. The adoption of this Statementguidance did not haveimpact the Corporation’s fair value methodologies on its financial liabilities
     In September 2009, the FASB updated the Codification to reflect SEC staff pronouncements on earnings-per-share calculations. According to the update, the SEC staff believes that when a significantpublic company redeems preferred shares, the difference between the fair value of the consideration transferred to the holders of the preferred stock and the carrying amount on the balance sheet after issuance costs of the preferred stock should be added to or subtracted from net income before doing an earnings per share calculation. The SEC’s staff also thinks it is not appropriate to aggregate preferred shares with different dividend yields when trying to determine whether the “if-converted” method is dilutive to the earnings per-share calculation. As of December 31, 2009, the Corporation has not been involved in a redemption or induced conversion of preferred stock.

67


     In January 2010, the FASB updated the Codification to provide guidance on accounting for distributions to shareholders with components of stock and cash. This guidance clarifies that the stock portion of a distribution to shareholders that allows them to elect to receive cash or stock with a potential limitation on the total amount of cash that all shareholders can elect to receive in the aggregate is considered a share issuance that is reflected in EPS prospectively and is not a stock dividend . The new guidance is effective for interim and annual periods ending on or after December 15, 2009, and would be applied on a retrospective basis. The adoption of this guidance did not impact on the Corporation’s financial statements.
     In January 2010, the FASB updated the Codification to provide guidance to improve disclosure requirements related to fair value measurements and require reporting entities to make new disclosures about recurring or nonrecurring fair-value measurements including significant transfers into and out of Level 1 and Level 2 fair-value measurements and information on purchases, sales, issuances, and settlements on a gross basis in the reconciliation of Level 3 fair-value measurements. The FASB also clarified existing fair-value measurement disclosure guidance about the level of disaggregation, inputs, and valuation techniques. Entities will be required to separately disclose significant transfers into and out of Level 1 and Level 2 measurements in the fair-value hierarchy and the reasons for the transfers. Significance will be determined based on earnings and total assets or total liabilities or, when changes in fair value are recognized in other comprehensive income, based on total equity. A reporting entity must disclose and consistently follow its policy for determining when transfers between levels are recognized. Acceptable methods for determining when to recognize transfers include: (i) actual date of the event or change in circumstances causing the transfer; (ii) beginning of the reporting period; and (iii) end of the reporting period. Currently, entities are only required to disclose activity in Level 3 measurements in the fair-value hierarchy on a net basis. This guidance will require separate disclosures for purchases, sales, issuances, and settlements of assets. Entities will also have to disclose the reasons for the activity and apply the same guidance on significance and transfer policies required for transfers between Level 1 and 2 measurements. The guidance requires disclosure of fair-value measurements by “class” instead of “major category.” A class is generally a subset of assets and liabilities within a financial statement line item and is based on the specific nature and risks of the assets and liabilities and their classification in the fair-value hierarchy. When determining classes, reporting entities must also consider the level of disaggregated information required by other applicable GAAP. For fair-value measurements using significant observable inputs (Level 2) or significant unobservable inputs (Level 3), this guidance requires reporting entities to disclose the valuation technique and the inputs used in determining fair value for each class of assets and liabilities. If the valuation technique has changed in the reporting period (e.g., from a market approach to an income approach) or if an additional valuation technique is used, entities are required to disclose the change and the reason for making the change. Except for the detailed Level 3 roll forward disclosures, the guidance is effective for annual and interim reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2009 (first quarter of 2010 for public companies with calendar year-ends). The new disclosures about purchases, sales, issuances, and settlements in the roll forward activity for Level 3 fair-value measurements are effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2010 (first quarter of 2011 for public companies with calendar year-ends). Early adoption is permitted. In the initial adoption period, entities are not required to include disclosures for previous comparative periods; however, they are required for periods ending after initial adoption. The Corporation is evaluating the impact the adoption of this guidance will have on its financial statements.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Net Interest Income
     Net interest income is the excess of interest earned by First BanCorp on its interest-earning assets over the interest incurred on its interest-bearing liabilities. First BanCorp’s net interest income is subject to interest rate risk due to the re-pricing and maturity mismatch of the Corporation’s assets and liabilities. Net interest income for the year ended December 31, 20082009 was $527.9$519.0 million, compared to $527.9 million and $451.0 million for 2008 and $443.7 million for 2007, and 2006, respectively. On an adjusted tax equivalent basis and excluding the changes in the fair value of derivative instruments the ineffective portion and the basis adjustment amortization or accretion resulting from fair value hedge accounting in 2006, and unrealized gains and losses on SFAS 159 liabilities measured at fair value, net interest income for the year ended December 31, 20082009 was $579.1$567.2 million, compared to $579.1 million and $475.4 million for 2008 and $529.9 million for 2007, and 2006, respectively.

68


     The following tables include a detailed analysis of net interest income. Part I presents average volumes and rates on an adjusted tax equivalent basis and Part II presents, also on an adjusted tax equivalent basis, the extent to which changes in interest rates and changes in volume of interest-related assets and liabilities have affected the Corporation’s net interest income. For each category of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities, information is provided on changes attributable to (i) changes in volume (changes in volume multiplied by prior period rates), and (ii) changes in rate (changes in rate multiplied by prior period volumes). Rate-volume variances (changes in rate multiplied by changes in volume) have been allocated to the changes in volume and rate based upon their respective percentage of the combined totals.
     For periods after the adoption of fair value hedge accounting and SFAS 159, theThe net interest income is computed on an adjusted tax equivalent basis (for definition and reconciliation of this non-GAAP measure, refer to discussions below) and excluding: (1) the change in the fair value of derivative instruments, (2) the ineffective portion of designated hedges, (3) the basis adjustment amortization or accretion and (4)(2) unrealized gains or losses on SFAS

60


159 liabilities. For periods prior to the adoption of hedge accounting, the net interest income is computed on an adjusted tax equivalent basis by excluding the impact of the change in theliabilities measured at fair value of derivatives (refer to explanation below regarding changes in the fair value of derivative instruments).value.
Part I
                                                                        
 Average volume Interest income(1)/ expense Average rate(1)  Average volume Interest income(1)/ expense Average rate(1) 
Year Ended December 31, 2008 2007 2006 2008 2007 2006 2008 2007 2006  2009 2008 2007 2009 2008 2007 2009 2008 2007 
 (Dollars in thousands)  (Dollars in thousands) 
Interest-earning assets:  
Money market & other short-term investments $286,502 $440,598 $1,444,533 $6,355 $22,155 $72,755  2.22%  5.03%  5.04% $182,205 $286,502 $440,598 $577 $6,355 $22,155  0.32%  2.22%  5.03%
Government obligations(2)
 1,402,738 2,687,013 2,827,196 93,539 159,572 170,088  6.67%  5.94%  6.02% 1,345,591 1,402,738 2,687,013 54,323 93,539 159,572  4.04%  6.67%  5.94%
Mortgage-backed securities 3,923,423 2,296,855 2,540,394 244,150 117,383 128,096  6.22%  5.11%  5.04% 4,254,044 3,923,423 2,296,855 238,992 244,150 117,383  5.62%  6.22%  5.11%
Corporate bonds 7,711 7,711 8,347 570 510 574  7.39%  6.61%  6.88% 4,769 7,711 7,711 294 570 510  6.16%  7.39%  6.61%
FHLB stock 65,081 46,291 26,914 3,710 2,861 2,009  5.70%  6.18%  7.46% 76,982 65,081 46,291 3,082 3,710 2,861  4.00%  5.70%  6.18%
Equity securities 3,762 8,133 27,155 47 3 350  1.25%  0.04%  1.29% 2,071 3,762 8,133 126 47 3  6.08%  1.25%  0.04%
                                
Total investments(3)
 5,689,217 5,486,601 6,874,539 348,371 302,484 373,872  6.12%  5.51%  5.44% 5,865,662 5,689,217 5,486,601 297,394 348,371 302,484  5.07%  6.12%  5.51%
                                
  
Residential real estate loans 3,351,236 2,914,626 2,606,664 215,984 188,294 171,333  6.44%  6.46%  6.57%
Residential mortgage loans 3,523,576 3,351,236 2,914,626 213,583 215,984 188,294  6.06%  6.44%  6.46%
Construction loans 1,485,126 1,467,621 1,462,239 82,513 121,917 126,592  5.56%  8.31%  8.66% 1,590,309 1,485,126 1,467,621 52,908 82,513 121,917  3.33%  5.56%  8.31%
Commercial loans 5,473,716 4,797,440 5,593,018 314,931 362,714 401,027  5.75%  7.56%  7.17%
C&I and commercial mortgage loans 6,343,635 5,473,716 4,797,440 263,935 314,931 362,714  4.16%  5.75%  7.56%
Finance leases 373,999 379,510 322,431 31,962 33,153 28,934  8.55%  8.74%  8.97% 341,943 373,999 379,510 28,077 31,962 33,153  8.21%  8.55%  8.74%
Consumer loans 1,709,512 1,729,548 1,783,384 197,581 202,616 214,967  11.56%  11.71%  12.05% 1,661,099 1,709,512 1,729,548 188,775 197,581 202,616  11.36%  11.56%  11.71%
                                
Total loans(4) (5)
 12,393,589 11,288,745 11,767,736 842,971 908,694 942,853  6.80%  8.05%  8.01% 13,460,562 12,393,589 11,288,745 747,278 842,971 908,694  5.55%  6.80%  8.05%
                                
Total interest-earning assets $18,082,806 $16,775,346 $18,642,275 $1,191,342 $1,211,178 $1,316,725  6.59%  7.22%  7.06% $19,326,224 $18,082,806 $16,775,346 $1,044,672 $1,191,342 $1,211,178  5.41%  6.59%  7.22%
                                
  
Interest-bearing liabilities:  
Interest-bearing checking accounts $580,572 $443,420 $371,422 $12,914 $11,365 $5,919  2.22%  2.56%  1.59% $866,464 $580,572 $443,420 $19,995 $12,914 $11,365  2.31%  2.22%  2.56%
Savings accounts 1,217,730 1,020,399 1,022,686 18,916 15,037 12,970  1.55%  1.47%  1.27% 1,540,473 1,217,730 1,020,399 19,032 18,916 15,037  1.24%  1.55%  1.47%
Certificates of deposit 9,484,051 9,291,900 10,479,500 391,665 498,048 531,188  4.13%  5.36%  5.07% 1,680,325 1,812,957 1,652,430 50,939 73,466 82,761  3.03%  4.05%  5.01%
Brokered CDs 7,300,696 7,671,094 7,639,470 227,896 318,199 415,287  3.12%  4.15%  5.44%
                                
Interest-bearing deposits 11,282,353 10,755,719 11,873,608 423,495 524,450 550,077  3.75%  4.88%  4.63% 11,387,958 11,282,353 10,755,719 317,862 423,495 524,450  2.79%  3.75%  4.88%
Loans payable 10,792   243    2.25%    643,618 10,792  2,331 243   0.36%  2.25%  
Other borrowed funds 3,864,189 3,449,492 4,543,262 148,753 172,890 223,069  3.85%  5.01%  4.91% 3,745,980 3,864,189 3,449,492 124,340 148,753 172,890  3.32%  3.85%  5.01%
FHLB advances 1,120,782 723,596 273,395 39,739 38,464 13,704  3.55%  5.32%  5.01% 1,322,136 1,120,782 723,596 32,954 39,739 38,464  2.49%  3.55%  5.32%
                                
Total interest-bearing liabilities(6)
 $16,278,116 $14,928,807 $16,690,265 $612,230 $735,804 $786,850  3.76%  4.93%  4.71% $17,099,692 $16,278,116 $14,928,807 $477,487 $612,230 $735,804  2.79%  3.76%  4.93%
                                
Net interest income $579,112 $475,374 $529,875  $567,185 $579,112 $475,374 
                          
Interest rate spread  2.83%  2.29%  2.35%  2.62%  2.83%  2.29%
Net interest margin  3.20%  2.83%  2.84%  2.93%  3.20%  2.83%
 
(1) On an adjusted tax equivalenttax-equivalent basis. The adjusted tax equivalenttax-equivalent yield was estimated by dividing the interest rate spread on exempt assets by (11 less the Puerto Rico statutory tax rate (39%as adjusted for 2008 and 2007, 43.5%changes to enacted tax rates (40.95% for the Corporation’s Puerto Rico banking subsidiarysubsidiaries other than IBEs in 20062009, 35.95% for the Corporation’s IBEs in 2009 and 41.5%39% for all other subsidiaries in 2006))2008 and 2007) and adding to it the cost of interest-bearing liabilities. When adjusted to aThe tax-equivalent adjustment recognizes the income tax equivalent basis, yields onsavings when comparing taxable and exempt assets are comparable.tax-exempt assets. Management believes that it is a standard practice in the banking industry to present net interest income, interest rate spread and net interest margin on a fully tax-equivalent basis. Therefore, management believes these measures provide useful information to investors by allowing them to make peer comparisons. Changes in the fair value of derivative instruments (including the ineffective portion after the adoption of hedge accounting in the second quarter of 2006),and unrealized gains or losses on SFAS 159 liabilities and basis adjustment amortization or accretionmeasured at fair value are excluded from interest income and interest expense because the changes in valuation do not affect interest paid or received.
 
(2) Government obligations include debt issued by government sponsored agencies.
 
(3) Unrealized gains and losses in available-for-sale securities are excluded from the average volumes.
 
(4) Average loan balances include the average of non-accruing loans.
 
(5) Interest income on loans includes $11.2 million, $10.2 million, and $11.1 million for 2009, 2008 and $14.9 million for 2008, 2007, and 2006, respectively, of income from prepayment penalties and late fees related to the Corporation’s loan portfolio.
 
(6) Unrealized gains and losses on SFAS 159 liabilities measured at fair value are excluded from the average volumes.

6169


Part II
                        
 2008 Compared to 2007 2007 Compared to 2006                         
 Increase (decrease) Increase (decrease)  2009 Compared to 2008 2008 Compared to 2007 
 Due to: Due to:  Increase (decrease) Increase (decrease) 
 Volume Rate Total Volume Rate Total  Due to: Due to: 
 (In thousands)  Volume Rate Total Volume Rate Total 
  (In thousands) 
Interest income on interest-earning assets:  
Money market & other short-term investments $(6,082) $(9,718) $(15,800) $(50,485) $(115) $(50,600) $(1,724) $(4,054) $(5,778) $(6,082) $(9,718) $(15,800)
Government obligations  (80,954) 14,921  (66,033)  (8,259)  (2,257)  (10,516)  (3,672)  (35,544)  (39,216)  (80,954) 14,921  (66,033)
Mortgage-backed securities 97,011 29,756 126,767  (12,367) 1,654  (10,713) 19,474  (24,632)  (5,158) 97,011 29,756 126,767 
Corporate bonds    60 60  (41)  (23)  (64)  (192)  (84)  (276)  60 60 
FHLB stock 1,115  (266) 849 1,323  (471) 852  578  (1,206)  (628) 1,115  (266) 849 
Equity securities  (29) 73 44  (145)  (202)  (347)  (62) 141 79  (29) 73 44 
                          
Total investments 11,061 34,826 45,887  (69,974)  (1,414)  (71,388) 14,402  (65,379)  (50,977) 11,061 34,826 45,887 
                          
  
Residential real estate loans 28,173  (483) 27,690 20,070  (3,109) 16,961 
Residential mortgage loans 10,716  (13,117)  (2,401) 28,173  (483) 27,690 
Construction loans 1,214  (40,618)  (39,404) 457  (5,132)  (4,675) 4,681  (34,286)  (29,605) 1,214  (40,618)  (39,404)
Commercial loans 45,020  (92,803)  (47,783)  (58,602) 20,289  (38,313)
C&I and commercial mortgage loans 43,028  (94,024)  (50,996) 45,020  (92,803)  (47,783)
Finance leases  (477)  (714)  (1,191) 5,054  (835) 4,219   (2,654)  (1,231)  (3,885)  (477)  (714)  (1,191)
Consumer loans  (2,332)  (2,703)  (5,035)  (6,396)  (5,955)  (12,351)  (5,466)�� (3,340)  (8,806)  (2,332)  (2,703)  (5,035)
                          
Total loans 71,598  (137,321)  (65,723)  (39,417) 5,258  (34,159) 50,305  (145,998)  (95,693) 71,598  (137,321)  (65,723)
                          
Total interest income 82,659  (102,495)  (19,836)  (109,391) 3,844  (105,547) 64,707  (211,377)  (146,670) 82,659  (102,495)  (19,836)
                          
  
Interest expense on interest-bearing liabilities:  
Deposits 23,142  (124,097)  (100,955)  (53,151) 27,524  (25,627)
Brokered CDs  (14,707)  (75,596)  (90,303) 1,591  (98,679)  (97,088)
Other interest-bearing deposits 12,285  (27,615)  (15,330) 21,551  (25,418)  (3,867)
Loans payable 243  243     8,265  (6,177) 2,088 243  243 
Other borrowed funds 18,327  (42,464)  (24,137)  (54,261) 4,082  (50,179)  (4,439)  (19,974)  (24,413) 18,327  (42,464)  (24,137)
FHLB advances 17,599  (16,324) 1,275 23,883 877 24,760  6,122  (12,907)  (6,785) 17,599  (16,324) 1,275 
                          
Total interest expense 59,311  (182,885)  (123,574)  (83,529) 32,483  (51,046) 7,526  (142,269)  (134,743) 59,311  (182,885)  (123,574)
                          
Change in net interest income $23,348 $80,390 $103,738 $(25,862) $(28,639) $(54,501) $57,181 $(69,108) $(11,927) $23,348 $80,390 $103,738 
                          
     A portion of the Corporation’s interest-earning assets, mostly investments in obligations of some U.S. Government agencies and sponsored entities, generate interest which is exempt from income tax, principally in Puerto Rico. Also, interest and gains on sale of investments held by the Corporation’s international banking entities are tax-exempt under the Puerto Rico tax law.law (refer to the Income Taxes discussion below for additional information regarding recent legislation that imposes a temporary 5% tax rate on IBEs’ net income). To facilitate the comparison of all interest data related to these assets, the interest income has been converted to aan adjusted taxable equivalent basis. The tax equivalent yield was estimated by dividing the interest rate spread on exempt assets by (11 less the Puerto Rico statutory tax rate (39%as adjusted for 2008 and 2007, 43.5%recent changes to enacted tax rates (40.95% for the Corporation’s Puerto Rico banking subsidiarysubsidiaries other than IBEs in 20062009, 35.95% for the Corporation’s IBEs in 2009 and 41.5%39% for all other subsidiaries in 2006))2008 and 2007) and adding to it the average cost of interest-bearing liabilities. The computation considers the interest expense disallowance required by Puerto Rico tax law. A significant increase in revenues was observed in connection with the increase in tax-exempt MBS held by the Corporation’s international banking entities. Refer to “Income Taxes” discussion below for additional information of the Puerto Rico tax law.
     The presentation of net interest income excluding the effects of the changes in the fair value of the derivative instruments including the ineffective portion for designated hedges after the adoption of fair value accounting, the basis adjustment amortization or accretion, and unrealized gains or losses on SFAS 159 liabilities measured at fair value provides additional information about the Corporation’s net interest income and facilitates comparability and analysis. The changes in the fair value of the derivative instruments the basis adjustment amortization or accretion, and unrealized gains or losses on SFAS 159 liabilities measured at fair value have no effect on interest due or interest earned on interest-bearing assets or interest-bearing liabilities, respectively, or on interest payments exchanged with interest rate swap counterparties.

70


     The following table reconciles the interest income on an adjusted tax equivalenttax-equivalent basis set forth in Part I above to interest income set forth in the Consolidated Statements of (Loss) Income:
                        
 Year Ended December 31,  Year Ended December 31, 
(In thousands) 2008 2007 2006  2009 2008 2007 
       
Interest income on interest-earning assets on an adjusted tax equivalent basis $1,191,342 $1,211,178 $1,316,725 
Interest income on interest-earning assets on an adjusted tax-equivalent basis $1,044,672 $1,191,342 $1,211,178 
Less: tax equivalent adjustments  (56,408)  (15,293)  (27,987)  (53,617)  (56,408)  (15,293)
Less: net unrealized (loss) gain on derivatives (economic undesignated hedges)  (8,037)  (6,638) 75 
Plus (less): net unrealized gain (loss) on derivatives 5,519  (8,037)  (6,638)
              
Total interest income $1,126,897 $1,189,247 $1,288,813  $996,574 $1,126,897 $1,189,247 
              

62


     The following table summarizes the components of the changes in fair values of interest rate swaps and interest rate caps, which are included in interest income:
                        
 Year Ended December 31,  Year Ended December 31, 
(In thousands) 2008 2007 2006  2009 2008 2007 
       
Unrealized (loss) gain on derivatives (economic undesignated hedges): 
Unrealized gain (loss) on derivatives (economic undesignated hedges): 
Interest rate caps $(4,341) $(3,985) $(472) $3,496 $(4,341) $(3,985)
Interest rate swaps on corporate bonds   27 
Interest rate swaps on loans  (3,696)  (2,653) 520  2,023  (3,696)  (2,653)
              
Net unrealized (loss) gain on derivatives (economic undesignated hedges) $(8,037) $(6,638) $75 
Net unrealized gain (loss) on derivatives (economic undesignated hedges) $5,519 $(8,037) $(6,638)
              
     The following table summarizes the components of interest expense for the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 2007 and 2006.2007. As previously stated, the net interest margin analysis excludes the changes in the fair value of derivatives and unrealized gains or losses on SFAS 159 liabilities the ineffective portion of derivative instruments designated asmeasured at fair value hedges under SFAS 133, and the basis adjustment:value:
            
 Year Ended December 31,             
 2008 2007 2006  Year Ended December 31, 
(In thousands) (In thousands)  2009 2008 2007 
   
Interest expense on interest-bearing liabilities $632,134 $713,918 $757,969  $460,128 $632,134 $713,918 
Net interest (realized) incurred on interest rate swaps  (35,569) 12,323 8,926   (5,499)  (35,569) 12,323 
Amortization of placement fees on brokered CDs 15,665 9,056 19,896  22,858 15,665 9,056 
Amortization of placement fees on medium-term notes  507 59    507 
              
Interest expense excluding net unrealized (gain) loss on derivatives (designated and economic undesignated hedges), net unrealized (gain) loss on SFAS 159 liabilities and accretion of basis adjustment 612,230 735,804 786,850 
Net unrealized (gain) loss on derivatives (designated and economic undesignated hedges) and SFAS 159 liabilities  (13,214) 4,488 61,895 
Interest expense excluding net unrealized loss (gain) on derivatives (economic undesignated hedges) and net unrealized (gain) loss on liabilities measured at fair value, 477,487 612,230 735,804 
Net unrealized loss (gain) on derivatives (economic undesignated hedges) and liabilities measured at fair value 45  (13,214) 4,488 
Accretion of basis adjustment   (2,061)  (3,626)  (2,061)   (2,061)
              
Total interest expense $599,016 $738,231 $845,119  $477,532 $599,016 $738,231 
              

71


     The following table summarizes the components of the net unrealized gain and loss on derivatives (designated and economic(economic undesignated hedges) and net unrealized gain and loss on SFAS 159 liabilities measured at fair value which are included in interest expense:
             
  Year Ended December 31, 
  2008  2007  2006 
(In thousands) (In thousands) 
Unrealized gain on derivatives (designated hedges - - ineffective portion):            
Interest rate swaps on brokered CDs $  $  $(3,989)
Interest rate swaps on medium-term notes        (720)
          
Net unrealized gain on derivatives (designated hedges - - ineffective portion)        (4,709)
          
             
Unrealized (gain) loss on derivatives (economic undesignated hedges):            
Interest rate swaps and other derivatives on brokered CDs  (62,856)  (66,826)  62,521 
Interest rate swaps and other derivatives on medium-term notes  (392)  692   4,083 
          
Net unrealized (gain) loss on derivatives (economic undesignated hedges)  (63,248)  (66,134)  66,604 
          
             
Unrealized (gain) loss on SFAS 159 liabilities:            
Unrealized loss on brokered CDs  54,199   71,116    
Unrealized gain on medium-term notes  (4,165)  (494)   
          
Net unrealized loss on SFAS 159 liabilities  50,034   70,622    
          
Net unrealized (gain) loss on derivatives (designated and economic undesignated hedges) and SFAS 159 liabilities $(13,214) $4,488  $61,895 
          
             
  Year Ended December 31, 
(In thousands) 2009  2008  2007 
Unrealized loss (gain) on derivatives (economic undesignated hedges):            
Interest rate swaps and other derivatives on brokered CDs $5,321  $(62,856) $(66,826)
Interest rate swaps and other derivatives on medium-term notes  199   (392)  692 
          
Net unrealized loss (gain) on derivatives (economic undesignated hedges)  5,520   (63,248)  (66,134)
          
             
Unrealized (gain) loss on liabilities measured at fair value:            
Unrealized (gain) loss on brokered CDs  (8,696)  54,199   71,116 
Unrealized loss (gain) on medium-term notes  3,221   (4,165)  (494)
          
Net unrealized (gain) loss on liabilities measured at fair value:  (5,475)  50,034   70,622 
          
Net unrealized loss (gain) on derivatives (economic undesignated hedges) and liabilities measured at fair value $45  $(13,214) $4,488 
          

63


     The following table summarizes the components of the accretion of basis adjustment which are included in interest expense in 2007 and 2006:2007:
                
 Year Ended December 31,  Year Ended December 31, 
 2008 2007 2006  2007 
 (In thousands)  (In thousands) 
Accretion of basis adjustments on fair value hedges: 
Accreation of basis adjustments on fair value hedges: 
Interest rate swaps on brokered CDs $ $ $(3,576) $ 
Interest rate swaps on medium-term notes   (2,061)  (50)  (2,061)
          
Accretion of basis adjustment on fair value hedges $ $(2,061) $(3,626) $(2,061)
          
     Interest income on interest-earning assets primarily represents interest earned on loans receivable and investment securities.
     Interest expense on interest-bearing liabilities primarily represents interest paid on brokered CDs, branch-based deposits, advances from the FHLB and FED, repurchase agreements and notes payable.
     Net interest incurred or realized on interest rate swaps primarily represents net interest exchanged on pay-float swaps that economically hedge (economically or under fair value hedge accounting) brokered CDs and medium-term notes.
     The amortization of broker placement fees represents the amortization of fees paid to brokers upon issuance of related financial instruments (i.e., brokered CDs not elected for the fair value option under SFAS 159)option). For 2007, the amortization of broker placement fees includes the derecognition of the unamortized balance of placement fees related to a $150 million note redeemed prior to its contractual maturity during the second quarter as well as the amortization of placement fees for brokered CDs not elected for the fair value option under SFAS 159.option.
     Unrealized gains or losses on derivatives represent: (1) for economic or undesignated hedges, including derivative instruments economically hedging SFAS 159 liabilities —represents changes in the fair value of derivatives, primarily interest rate swaps, that economically hedge liabilities (i.e., brokered CDs and medium-term notes) or assets (i.e., loans and corporate bonds), and (2) for designated hedges — the ineffectiveness represented by the difference between the changes in the fair value of the derivative instrument (i.e., interest rate swaps) and changes in fair value of the hedged item (i.e., brokered CDs and medium-term notes)investments).
     Unrealized gains or losses on SFAS 159 liabilities representmeasured at fair value represents the change in the fair value of such liabilities (medium-term notes and brokered CDs), other than the accrual of interests, for which the Corporation elected the fair value option under SFAS 159.interests.
     For 2007, the basis adjustment represents the basis differential between the market value and the book value of a $150 million medium-term note recognized at the inception of fair value hedge accounting on April 3, 2006, as well as changes in fair value recognized after the inception until the discontinuance of fair value hedge accounting on January 1, 2007, which was amortized or accreted based on the expected maturity of the liability as a yield adjustment. The unamortized balance of the basis adjustment was derecognized as part of the redemption of the $150 million note resulting in an adjustment to earnings of $1.9 million recognized as an accretion of basis adjustment, during the second quarter of 2007. For 2006, the basis adjustment represents the amortization or accretion of the basis differential between the market value and the book value of the hedged liabilities recognized at the inception of fair value hedge accounting, which was amortized or accreted to interest expense based on the expected maturity of the hedged liabilities as changes in value after the inception of the long-haul method.

72


     As shown on the tables above, the results of operations for 2008, 2007, and 2006 were impacted by changes in the valuation of derivative instruments that hedge economically or under fair value designation the Corporation’s brokered CDs and medium-term notes and by unrealized gains and losses on SFAS 159 liabilities. The adoption of fair value hedge accounting during the second quarter of 2006 and SFAS 159, effective January 1, 2007, reduced the earnings volatility caused by fluctuations in the value of derivative instruments.
     Derivative instruments, such as interest rate swaps, are subject to market risk. While the Corporation does have certain trading derivatives to facilitate customer transactions, the Corporation does not utilize derivative instruments for speculative purposes. The Corporation’s derivativesAs of December 31, 2009, most of the interest rate swaps outstanding are mainly composedused for protection against rising interest rates. In the past, the volume of interest rate swaps that arewas much higher, as they were used to

64


convert the fixed interest payment on itsfixed-rate of a large portfolio of brokered CDs, mainly those with long-term maturities, to a variable rate and medium-term notesmitigate the interest rate risk related to variable payments (receive fixed/pay floating).rate loans. However, most of these interest rate swaps were called during 2009, due to lower interest rate levels. Refer to Note 3032 of the Corporation’s audited financial statements for the year ended December 31, 20082009 included in Item 8 of this Form 10-K for further details concerning the notional amounts of derivative instruments and additional information. As is the case with investment securities, the market value of derivative instruments is largely a function of the financial market’s expectations regarding the future direction of interest rates. Accordingly, current market values are not necessarily indicative of the future impact of derivative instruments on net interest income. This will depend, for the most part, on the shape of the yield curve, the level of interest rates, as well as the levelexpectations for rates in the future.
2009 compared to 2008
     Net interest income decreased 2% to $519.0 million for 2009 from $527.9 million for 2008 adversely impacted by a 27 basis points decrease, on an adjusted tax-equivalent basis, in the Corporation’ net interest margin. The decrease in the yield of the Corporation’s average interest-earning assets declined more than the cost of the average interest-bearing liabilities. The yield on interest-earning assets decreased 118 basis points to 5.41% for 2009 from 6.59% for 2008. The decrease was primarily the result of a lower yield on average loans which decreased 125 basis points to 5.55% for 2009 from 6.80% for 2008. The decrease in the yield on average loans was primarily due to the increase in non-accrual loans which resulted in the reversal of accrued interest. Also contributing to a lower yield on average loans was the decline in market interest rates that resulted in reductions in interest income from variable rate loans, primarily commercial and construction loans tied to short-term indexes, even though the Corporation is actively increasing spreads on loans renewals. The Corporation increased the use of interest rates.rate floors in new commercial and construction loans agreements and renewals in 2009 to protect net interest margins going forward. The average 3-month LIBOR for 2009 was 0.69% compared to 2.93% for 2008 and the Prime Rate for 2009 was 3.25% compared to an average of 5.08% for 2008. Lower yields were also observed in the investment securities portfolio, driven by the approximately $946 million of U.S. agency debentures called in 2009 and MBS prepayments, which were replaced with lower yielding investments financed with very low-cost sources of funding.
     The cost of average-interest bearing liabilities decreased 97 basis to 2.79% for 2009 from 3.76% for 2008, primarily due to the decline short-term rates and changes in the mix of funding sources. The weighted-average cost of brokered CDs decreased 103 basis points to 3.12% for 2009 from 4.15% for 2008 primarily due to the replacement of maturing or callable brokered CDs that had interest rates above current market rates with shorter-term brokered CDs. Also, as a result of the general decline in market interest rates, lower interest rates were paid on existing customer money market and savings accounts coupled with lower interest rates paid on new deposits. In addition, the Corporation increased the use of short-term advances from the FHLB and the FED. The Corporation increased its short-term borrowings as a measure of interest rate risk management to match the shortening in the average life of the investment portfolio and shifted the funding emphasis to retail deposit to reduce reliance on brokered CDs.
     Partially offsetting the compression in net interest margin, was an increase of $1.2 billion in average interest-earning assets. The higher volume of average interest-earning assets was driven by the growth of the C&I loan portfolio in Puerto Rico, primarily due to credit facilities extended to the Puerto Rico Government and its political subdivisions. Also, funds obtained through short-term borrowings were invested, in part, in the purchase of investment securities to mitigate the decline in the average yield on securities that resulted from the acceleration of MBS prepayments and calls of U.S. agency debentures.
     On an adjusted tax-equivalent basis, net interest income decreased by $11.9 million, or 2%, for 2009 compared to 2008. The decrease was principally due to lower yields on earning-assets as described above and a decrease of $2.8 million in the tax-equivalent adjustment. The tax-equivalent adjustment increases interest income on tax-exempt securities and loans by an amount which makes tax-exempt income comparable, on a pre-tax basis, to the Corporation’s taxable income as previously stated. The decrease in the tax-equivalent adjustment was mainly related to decreases in the interest rate spread on tax-exempt assets, mainly due to lower yields on U.S. agency

73


debentures an MBS held by the Corporation’s IBE subsidiary, as the Corporation replaced securities called and sold as well as prepayments of MBS with shorter-term securities, and due to the decrease in income tax savings on securities held by FirstBank Overseas Corporation resulting from the temporary 5% tax imposed in 2009 to all IBEs (see Income Taxes discussion below).
     2008 compared to 2007
     Net interest income increased 17% to $527.9 million for 2008 from $451.0 million for 2007. Approximately $14.2 million of the total net interest income increase iswas related to fluctuations in the fair value of derivative instruments and financial liabilities elected to be measured at fair value under SFAS 159.value. The Corporation’s net interest spread and margin for 2008, on an adjusted tax equivalent basis, for 2008 were 2.83% and 3.20%, respectively, up 54 and 37 basis points from 2007. The increase was mainly associated with a decrease in the average cost of funds resulting from lower short-term interest rates and, to a lesser extent, to a higher volume of interest earning assets. During 2008, the target for the Federal Funds rate was lowered from 4.25% to a range of 0% to 0.25% through seven separate actions in an attempt to stimulate the U.S. economy, officially in recession since December 2007. The decrease in funding costs more than offset lower loan yields resulting from the repricing of variable-rate construction and commercial loans tied to short-term indexes and from a higher volume of non-accrual loans.
     Average earning assets for 2008 increased by $1.3 billion, as compared to 2007, driven by commercial and residential real estate loan originations, and, to a lesser extent, purchases of loans during 2008 that contributed to a wider spread. In addition, the Corporation purchased approximately $3.2 billion in U.S. government agency fixed-rate MBS having an average yield of 5.44% during 2008, which is higher than the cost of the borrowing required to finance the purchase of such assets, thus contributing to a higher net interest income as compared to 2007. The increase in the loan and MBS portfolio was partially offset by the early redemption, through call exercises, of approximately $1.2 billion of U.S. Agency debentures with an average yield of 5.87% due to the drop in rates in the long end of the yield curve.
     On the funding side, the average cost of the Corporation’s interest-bearing liabilities decreased by 117 basis points mainly due to lower short-term rates and the mix of borrowings. The benefit from the decline in short-term rates in 2008 was partially offset by the Corporation’s strategy, in managing its asset/liability position in order to limit the effects of changes in interest rates on net interest income, of reducing its exposure to high levels of market volatility by, among other things, extending the duration of its borrowings and replacing swapped-to-floating brokered CDs that matured or were called (due to lower short-term rates) with brokered CDs not hedged with interest rate swaps. Also, the Corporation has reduced its interest rate risk through other funding sources and by, among other things, entering into long-term and structured repurchase agreements that replaced short-term borrowings. The volume of swapped-to-floating brokered CDs has decreased by approximately $3.0 billion to $1.1 billion as of December 31, 2008 from $4.1 billion a year ago. This strategy has better positioned the Corporation for possible adverse changes in interest rates in the future.as of December 31, 2007.
     On the asset side, the average yield onof the Corporation’s interest-earning assets decreased by 63 basis points driven by lower yields on the variable-rate commercial and construction loan portfolio. The weighted-average yield on loans decreased by 125 basis points during 2008. In the latter part of 2008, the Corporation took initial steps to obtain higher pricing on its variable-rate commercial loan portfolio; however, this effort was severely impacted by significant declines in short-term rates during the last quarter of 2008 (the Prime Rate dropped to 3.25% from 7.25% at December 31, 2007 and 3-month LIBOR closed at 1.43% on December 31, 2008 from 4.70% on December 31, 2007) and, to ana lesser extent, by the increase in the volume of non-performing loans. Lower loanloans yields were partially offset by higher yields on tax-exempt securities such as U.S. agency MBS held by the Corporation’s international banking entity subsidiary. Expected acceleration in MBS prepayments in 2009 may require the reinvestment of proceeds at lower prevailing rates, but the Corporation will strive to protect the net interest rate spread through its re-investment strategy and through new loan originations.

65


     On an adjusted tax equivalent basis, net interest income increased by $103.7 million, or 22%, for 2008 compared to 2007. The increase was principally due to the lower short-term rates discussed above but also was positively impacted by a $41.1 million increase in the tax-equivalent adjustment. The tax-equivalent adjustment increases interest income on tax-exempt securities and loans by an amount which makes tax-exempt income comparable, on a pre-tax basis, to the Corporation’s taxable income as previously stated. The increase in the tax-equivalent adjustment was mainly related to increases in the interest rate spread on tax-exempt assets due to lower short-term rates and a higher volume of tax-exempt MBS held by the Corporation’s international banking entity subsidiary, FirstBank Overseas Corporation.
2007 compared to 2006
     Net interest income increased to $451.0 million for 2007 from $443.7 million in 2006. The increase in net interest income for 2007, as compared to 2006, was mainly driven by the effect in 2006 earnings of unrealized non-cash losses related to changes in the fair value of derivative instruments prior to the implementation of fair value hedge accounting using the long-haul method on April 3, 2006. During the first quarter of 2006, the Corporation recorded changes in the fair value of derivative instruments as non-hedging instruments through operations recording unrealized losses of $69.7 million for derivatives as part of interest expense. The adoption of fair value hedge accounting in the second quarter of 2006 and the adoption of SFAS 159 in 2007 reduced the accounting volatility that previously resulted from the accounting asymmetry created by accounting for the financial liabilities at amortized cost and the derivatives at fair value. The change in the valuation of derivative instruments, the net unrealized loss on SFAS 159 liabilities, the basis adjustment and the ineffective portion on designated hedges recorded as part of net interest income (“the valuation changes”) resulted in a net non-cash loss of $9.1 million for 2007, compared to a net unrealized loss of $58.2 million for 2006.
     For the year ended December 31, 2007, net interest income on an adjusted tax equivalent basis decreased 10% as compared to the previous year from $529.9 million to $475.4 million. Net interest income on an adjusted tax equivalent basis excludes the valuation changes. The decrease in net interest income on an adjusted tax equivalent basis was mainly driven by the continued pressure of the flattening of the yield curve during most of 2007 and the decrease in the average volume of interest-earning assets primarily due to the repayment of approximately $2.4 billion received from a local financial institution reducing the balance of its secured commercial loan with the Corporation during the latter part of the second quarter of 2006. This partially extinguished secured commercial loan yielded 150 basis points over 3-month LIBOR. The repayment caused a reduction in net interest income of approximately $15.0 million when comparing results for the year ended December 31, 2007 to previous year results. Furthermore, the adjusted tax equivalent basis includes an adjustment that increases interest income on tax-exempt securities and loans by an amount which makes tax-exempt income comparable, on a pre-tax basis, to the Corporation’s taxable income. The tax equivalent adjustment declined to $15.3 million for 2007 from $28.0 million for 2006 mainly due to the decrease in the interest rate spread on tax-exempt assets resulting from the sustained flatness of the yield curve as well as changes in the proportion of tax-exempt assets to total assets and changes in the statutory income tax rate in Puerto Rico.
     Notwithstanding the decrease in adjusted tax equivalent net interest income in absolute terms, the Corporation was able to maintain its net interest margin on an adjusted tax equivalent basis at a relatively stable level. Net interest margin for the year ended December 31, 2007 was 2.83%, compared to 2.84% for the previous year reflecting the effect of the Corporation’s decision to deleverage its balance sheet as well as the effect of the steepened yield curve during the last quarter of 2007. During the second half of 2007, the Corporation sold approximately $556 million and $400 million of low-yielding mortgage-backed securities and U.S. Treasury investments, respectively, and used the proceeds in part to pay down high cost borrowings as they matured. The Corporation re-invested approximately $566 million in higher-yielding U.S. Agency mortgage-backed securities. The Corporation was able to mitigate the pressure of the sustained flatness of the yield curve during most of 2007 by the redemption of its $150 million medium-term notes which carried a cost higher than the overall cost of funding and by the increase in the amount of structured repos entered into by the Corporation which price below LIBOR or are structured to lock-in interest rates that are lower than yields on the securities serving as collateral for an extended period.
     Total interest income on an adjusted tax equivalent basis decreased by $105.5 million, mainly due to a decrease in average interest-earning assets. The Corporation’s average interest-earning assets decreased by $1.9 billion or

6674


10% for 2007 compared to 2006. For the investment portfolio, the decrease in average volume was mainly driven by the use of short-term investments to repay short-term brokered CDs as these matured and the sale of low-yield mortgage-backed securities and U.S. government obligations representing a decrease of approximately $70.0 million in interest income on investments. After receiving the repayment of $2.4 billion from a local financial institution, the Corporation invested the proceeds in money market investments. During the second half of 2006, the Corporation used part of the proceeds to repay short-term brokered certificates of deposit, mainly issued in 2006, as these matured. For the loan portfolio, the decrease in average volume, was mainly driven by the aforementioned payment of $2.4 billion received in 2006 from a local financial institution reducing the balance of a secured commercial loan, partially offset by loan originations that resulted in increases in the average balance of the residential, construction and consumer loan portfolios. Declining loan yields on the Corporation’s residential, construction and consumer loan portfolios attributable to the increase in the balance of non-performing loans also adversely affected interest income during 2007.
     The Corporation’s total interest expense, excluding changes in the fair value of derivatives and the ineffective portion and basis adjustment amortization or accretion, decreased by $51.0 million or 6% in 2007 compared to 2006. The decrease in interest expense was due to the deleverage of the Corporation’s balance sheet by selling low-yielding investment securities and using part of the proceeds to pay down high cost borrowings as they matured. This was partially offset by a higher average cost of borrowings due to higher short-term interest rates experienced during most of 2007 as compared to 2006. During 2007, as compared to 2006, the average volume of deposits decreased by $1.1 billion and the related average rate increased by 25 basis points, the average volume of other borrowed funds decreased by $1.1 billion and the related average rate increased by 10 basis points and the average volume of FHLB advances increased by $450.2 million and the related average rate increased by 31 basis points. The decrease in the average volume of interest-bearing liabilities resulted in a decrease in total interest expense due to volume of $83.5 million that was partially offset by the increase in the average cost of funds which resulted in an increase in interest expense due to rate of $32.5 million.
Provision for Loan and Lease Losses
     The provision for loan and lease losses is charged to earnings to maintain the allowance for loan and lease losses at a level that the Corporation considers adequate to absorb probable losses inherent in the portfolio. The adequacy of the allowance for loan and lease losses is also based upon a number of additional factors including historical loantrends in charge-offs and lease loss experience,delinquencies, current economic conditions, the fair value of the underlying collateral and the financial condition of the borrowers, and, as such, includes amounts based on judgments and estimates made by the Corporation. Although the Corporation believes that the allowance for loan and lease losses is adequate, factors beyond the Corporation’s control, including factors affecting the economies of Puerto Rico, the United States, (principally the state of Florida), the U.S. Virgin Islands and the British Virgin Islands, may contribute to delinquencies and defaults, thus necessitating additional reserves.
     During 2008,2009, the Corporation provided $190.9 millionrecorded a provision for loan and lease losses of $579.9 million, compared to $190.9 million in 2008 and $120.6 million in 2007.
2009 compared to 2008
     The increase, as compared to $120.62008, was mainly related to:
Increases in specific reserves for construction and commercial impaired loans.
Increases in non-performing and net charge-offs levels.
The migration of loans to higher risk categories, thus requiring higher general reserves.
The overall growth of the loan portfolio.
     Even though the deterioration in credit quality was observed in all of the Corporation’s portfolios, it was more significant in the construction and C&I loan portfolios, which were affected by the stagnant housing market and further deterioration in the economies of the markets served. The provision for loan losses for the construction loan portfolio increased by $211.1 million and the provision for the C&I loan portfolio increased by $110.6 million compared to 2008. This increase accounts for approximately 83% of the increase in the provision. As mentioned above, the increase was mainly driven by the migration of loans to higher risk categories, increases in specific reserves for impaired loans, and increases to loss factors used to determine the general reserve to account for negative trends in non-performing loans, charge-offs affected by declines in collateral values and economic indicators. The provision for residential mortgages also increased significantly for 2009, as compared to 2008, an increase of $32 million, as a result of updating general reserve factors and a higher portfolio of delinquent loans evaluated for impairment purposes that was adversely impacted by decreases in collateral values.
     In terms of geography, the Corporation recorded a $366.0 million provision in 2009 for its loan portfolio in Puerto Rico compared to $125.0 million in 20072008, an increase of $241.0 million mainly related to the C&I and $75.0construction loans portfolio. The provision for C&I loans in Puerto Rico increased by $116.5 million and the provision for the construction loan portfolio in Puerto Rico increased by $101.3 million. Rising unemployment and the depressed economy negatively impacted borrowers and was reflected in a persistent decline in the volume of new housing sales and underperformance of important sectors of the economy.
     With respect to the United States loan portfolio, the Corporation recorded a $188.7 million provision in 2009 compared to a $53.4 million provision in 2008, an increase of $135.3 million mainly related to the construction loan portfolio. The provision for construction loans in the United States increased by $95.0 million compared to 2008, primarily due to charges against specific reserves for impaired construction projects, mainly collateral dependent loans that were charged-off to their collateral value in 2009 (refer to the “Risk Management — Credit Risk Management — Allowance for Loan and Lease Losses and Non-performing Assets” discussion below for additional information about charge-offs recorded in 2009). Impaired loans in the United States increased from $210.1 million at December 31, 2008 to $461.1 million by the end of 2009. As of December

75


31, 2009, approximately 89%, or $265.1 million of the total exposure to construction loans in Florida was individually measured for impairment.
     The provision recorded for the loan portfolio in the Virgin Islands amounted to $25.2 million in 2006.2009, an increase of $12.7 million compared to 2008 mainly related to the construction loan portfolio.
     Refer to the discussions under “Risk Management Credit Risk Management Allowance for Loan and Lease Losses and Non-performing Assets” below for analysis of the allowance for loan and lease losses, and non-performing assets, impaired loans and related ratios.information.
     2008 compared to 2007
     The increase, as compared to 2007, iswas mainly attributable to the significant increase in delinquency levels and increases in specific reserves for impaired commercial and construction loans adversely impacted by deteriorating economic conditions in the United States and Puerto Rico. Also, increases to reserve factors for potential losses inherent in the loan portfolio, higher reserves for the residential mortgage loan portfolio in the U.S. mainland and Puerto Rico and the overall growth of the Corporation’s loan portfolio contributed to higher charges in 2008.
     During 2008, the Corporation experienced continued stress in the credit quality of and worsening trends on its construction loan portfolio, in particular, condo-conversion loans affected by the continuing deterioration in the health of the economy, an oversupply of new homes and declining housing prices in the United States. The total

67


exposure of the Corporation to condo-conversion loans in the United States iswas approximately $197.4 million or less than 2% of the total loan portfolio. A total of approximately $154.4 million of this condo-conversioncondo conversion portfolio iswas considered impaired under SFAS 114 with a specific reserve of $36.0 million allocated to these impaired loans during 2008. Current absorptionAbsorption rates in condo-conversion loans in the United States arewere low and properties collateralizing some loans originally disbursed as condo-conversion have beenwere formally reverted to rental properties with a future plan for the sale of converted units upon an improvement in the United States real estate market. As of December 31, 2008, approximately $47.8 million of loans originally disbursed as condo-conversion construction loans have been reverted to income-producing commercial loans. Higher reserves were also necessary for the residential mortgage loan portfolio in the U.S. mainland in light of increased delinquency levels and the decrease in housing prices. The Corporation’s loan portfolio in the United States mainland, mainly in the state of Florida, totals $1.5 billion, or 11% of the total loan portfolio.
     In Puerto Rico, the Corporation’s impaired commercial and construction loan portfolio amounted to approximately $164 million and $106 million, respectively, with specific reserves of $21 million and $19 million, respectively, allocated to these loans during 2008. The Corporation also increased its reserves for the residential mortgage and construction loan portfolio from the 2007 levels to account for the increased credit risk tied to recessionary conditions in Puerto Rico’s economy, which are expected to continue at least through the remainder of 2009. The Puerto Rico housing market has not seen the dramatic decline in housing prices that is affecting the U.S. mainland; however, there has been a lower demand for houses due to diminished consumer purchasing power and confidence.economy.
    ��Refer to the discussions under “Financial Condition and Operating Analysis Lending Activities” and under “Risk Management Credit Risk Management” below for additional information concerning the Corporation’s loan portfolio exposure to the geographic areas where the Corporation does business.
2007 compared to 2006
     First BanCorp’s provision for loan and lease losses for the year ended December 31, 2007 increased by $45.6 million, or 61%, compared to 2006. The increase in the provision was primarily due to deterioration in the credit quality of the Corporation’s loan portfolio associated with the weakening economic conditions in Puerto Rico and the slowdown in the United States housing sector. In particular, the increase was mainly related to specific and general provisions related to the construction loan portfolio of the Corporation’s Corporate Banking operations in Miami, Florida and increases in the general reserves allocated to the consumer loan portfolio.
     During the third quarter of 2007, the Corporation recorded an impairment of $8.1 million on four condo-conversion loans, with an aggregate principal balance of $60.5 million at the time of the impairment evaluation, extended to a single borrower through its Corporate banking operations in Miami, Florida based on an updated impairment analysis that incorporated new appraisals. The increase in non-accrual loans and charge-offs during 2007, other than the aforementioned troubled loan relationship, as compared to 2006, was attributable to weak economic conditions in Puerto Rico. Puerto Rico is in the midst of a recession caused by, among other things, higher utilities prices, higher taxes, government budgetary imbalances, and higher levels of oil prices.
     The above-mentioned troubled relationship comprised four condo-conversion loans that the Corporation had placed in non-accrual status during the second and third quarters of 2007. For the third quarter of 2007, the Corporation updated the impairment analysis on the relationship and requested new appraisals that reflected collateral deficiency as compared to the Corporation’s recorded investment in the loans. The aggregate unpaid principal balance of the relationship classified as non-accrual decreased to $46.4 million as of December 31, 2007, net of a charge-off of $3.3 million recorded to this relationship in the fourth quarter of 2007. The charge-off was recorded at the time of sale of one of the loans in the relationship. This sale was made at a price that exceeded the recorded investment in the loan (loan receivable less specific reserve) by approximately $1 million.
     In 2008, the Corporation sold another of the impaired loans with a carrying value of $21.8 million for $22.5 million. The other two loans were foreclosed during 2008 and one of the projects with a carrying value of $3.8 million was sold in the fourth quarter of 2008 and a $0.4 million loss was recorded on the sale. The Corporation expects to complete the sale of the last remaining foreclosed condo-conversion project of the aforementioned troubled relationship in the U.S. mainland in the first half of 2009.

6876


Non-interest Income
     The following table presents the composition of non-interest income:
            
 2008 2007 2006             
 (In thousands)  2009 2008 2007 
  (In thousands) 
Other service charges on loans $6,309 $6,893 $5,945  $6,830 $6,309 $6,893 
Service charges on deposit accounts 12,895 12,769 12,591  13,307 12,895 12,769 
Mortgage banking activities 3,273 2,819 2,259  8,605 3,273 2,819 
Rental income 2,246 2,538 3,264  1,346 2,246 2,538 
Insurance income 10,157 10,877 11,284  8,668 10,157 10,877 
Other operating income 18,570 13,595 14,327  18,362 18,570 13,595 
              
  
Non-interest income before net gain (loss) on investments, insurance reimbursement and other agreements related to a contingency settlement, net gain on partial extinguishment and recharacterization of secured commercial loans to local financial institutions and gain on sale of credit card portfolio 53,450 49,491 49,670  57,118 53,450 49,491 
              
  
Gain on VISA shares and other proceeds 9,474   
Gain on VISA shares and related proceeds 3,784 9,474  
Net gain on sale of investments 17,706 3,184 7,057  83,020 17,706 3,184 
Impairment on investments  (5,987)  (5,910)  (15,251)
OTTI on equity securities and corporate bonds  (388)  (5,987)  (5,910)
OTTI on debt securities  (1,270)   
              
Net gain (loss) on investments 21,193  (2,726)  (8,194) 85,146 21,193  (2,726)
Insurance reimbursement and other agreements related to a contingency settlement  15,075     15,075 
Gain on partial extinguishment and recharacterization of secured commercial loans to local financial institutions  2,497  (10,640)   2,497 
Gain on sale of credit card portfolio  2,819 500    2,819 
              
 
Total $74,643 $67,156 $31,336  $142,264 $74,643 $67,156 
              
     Non-interest income primarily consists of other service charges on loans; service charges on deposit accounts; commissions derived from various banking, securities and insurance activities; gains and losses on mortgage banking activities; and net gains and losses on investments and impairments.
     Other service charges on loans consist mainly of service charges on credit card-related activities and other non-deferrable fees.fees (e.g. agent, commitment and drawing fees).
     Service charges on deposit accounts include monthly fees and other fees on deposit accounts.
     Income from mortgage banking activities includes gains on sales and securitization of loans and revenues earned for administering residential mortgage loans originated by the Corporation and subsequently sold with servicing retained. In addition, lower-of-cost-or-market valuation adjustments to the Corporation’s residential mortgage loans held for sale portfolio and servicing rights portfolio, if any, are recorded as part of mortgage banking activities.
     Rental income represents income generated by the Corporation’s subsidiary, First Leasing, and Rental Corporation, on the rental of various types of motor vehicles. As part of its strategies to focus on its core business, the Corporation divested its short-term rental business during the fourth quarter of 2009.

77


     Insurance income consists of insurance commissions earned by the Corporation’s subsidiary, FirstBank Insurance Agency, Inc., and the Bank’s subsidiary in the U.S. Virgin Islands, FirstBank Insurance V.I., Inc. These subsidiaries offer a wide variety of insurance business.
     The other operating income category is composed of miscellaneous fees such as debit, credit card and point of sale (POS) interchange fees and check and cash management fees.fees and includes commissions from the Corporation’s broker-dealer subsidiary, FirstBank Puerto Rico Securities.

69


     The net gain (loss) on investment securities reflects gains or losses as a result of sales that are consistent with the Corporation’s investment policies as well as other-than-temporary impairment charges (OTTI) on the Corporation’s investment portfolio.
2009 compared to 2008
     Non-interest income increased $67.6 million to $142.3 million for 2009, primarily reflecting:
§A $59.6 million increase in realized gains on the sale of investment securities, primarily reflecting a $79.9 million gain on the sale of MBS (mainly U.S. agency fixed-rate MBS), compared to realized gains on the sale of MBS of $17.7 million in 2008. In an effort to manage interest rate risk, and take advantage of favorable market valuations, approximately $1.8 billion of U.S. agency MBS (mainly 30 Year fixed-rate U.S. agency MBS) were sold in 2009, compared to approximately $526 million of U.S. agency MBS sold in 2008.
§A $5.3 million increase in gains from mortgage banking activities, due to the increased volume of loan sales and securitizations. Servicing assets recorded at the time of sale amounted to $6.1 million for 2009 compared to $1.6 million for 2008. The increase is mainly related to $4.6 million of capitalized servicing assets in connection with the securitization of approximately $305 million FHA/VA mortgage loans into GNMA MBS. For the first time in several years, the Corporation has been engaged in the securitization of mortgage loans in 2009.
§A $5.6 million decrease in OTTI charges related to equity securities and corporate bonds, partially offset by OTTI charges through earnings of $1.3 million in 2009 related to the credit loss portion of available-for-sale private label MBS.
     Also contributing to the increase in non-interest income was higher fee income, mainly fees on loans and service charges on deposit accounts offset by lower income from insurance activities and a reduction in income from vehicle rental activities. During the first three quarters of 2009, income from rental activities decreased by $0.5 million due to a lower volume of business. A further reduction of $0.4 million was observed in the fourth quarter of 2009, as compared to the comparable period in 2008, mainly related to the disposition of the Corporation’s vehicle rental business early in the quarter, which was partially offset by a $0.2 million gain recorded for the disposition of the business.
     2008 compared to 2007
     Non-interest income increased 11% to $74.6 million for 2008 from $67.2 million for 2007. The increase iswas related to a realized gain of $17.7 million on the sale of approximately $526 million of U.S. sponsored agency fixed-rate MBS and to the gain of $9.3 million on the sale of part of the Corporation’s investment in VISA in connection with VISA’s IPO. The announcement of the FED that it will invest up to $600 billion in obligations from U.S. government-sponsored agencies, including $500 billion in MBS backed by FNMA, FHLMC and GNMA, caused a surge in prices and sent mortgage rates down to the lowest levels since February and offered a market opportunity to realize a gain. Higher point of sale (POS) and ATM interchange fee income and an increase in fee income from cash management services provided to corporate customers accounted for approximately $3.9 million of the increase in non-interest income. Other-than-temporary impairmentOTTI charges amounted to $6.0 million in 2008, compared to $5.9 million in 2007. Different from 2007 when impairment charges related exclusively to equity securities, most of the impairment charges in 2008 (approximately $4.2 million) werewas related to auto industry corporate bonds held by FirstBank Florida. The Corporation’s remaining exposure to auto industry corporate bonds as of December 31, 2008 amounted to $1.5 million, while its exposure to equity securities was approximately $2.2 million. These auto industry corporate bonds were sold in 2009 and a gain of $0.9 million was recorded at the time of sale, while

78


the exposure to equity securities was reduced to $1.8 million as of December 31, 2009 after OTTI charges of $0.4 million recorded in 2009
     The increase in non-interest income attributable to activities mentioned above was partially offset, when comparing 2008 to 2007, by isolated events such as the $15.1 million income recognition in 2007 for reimbursement of expenses related to the class action lawsuit settled in 2007, and a gain of $2.8 million on the sale of a credit card portfolio and of $2.5 million on the partial extinguishment and recharacterization of a secured commercial loan to a local financial institution that were recognized in 2007 as described below.2007.
2007 compared to 2006
     First BanCorp’s non-interest income for 2007 amounted to $67.2 million, compared to $31.3 million for 2006. The increase in non-interest income was mainly attributable to income recognition of approximately $15.1 million for agreements reached with insurance carriers and former executives for reimbursement of expenses related to the settlement of the class action lawsuit brought against the Corporation coupled with lower other-than-temporary impairment charges on certain of the Corporation’s equity securities portfolio, as compared to 2006. For 2007, other-than-temporary impairment charges on equity securities decreased by $9.3 million, as compared to impairment charges recognized for 2006. Also, a net change of $13.1 million in net gains and losses related to partial repayments of certain secured commercial loans extended to local financial institutions (2007-net gain of $2.5 million; 2006—net loss of $10.6 million), a higher gain on the sale of its credit card portfolio and higher income from service charges on loans contributed to the increase in non-interest income during 2007 as compared to 2006.
     During 2006, the Corporation recorded a net loss of $10.6 million on the partial extinguishment of a secured commercial loan extended to a local financial institution as a result of a series of credit agreements reached with Doral to formally document as secured borrowings the loan transfers between the parties that previously had been accounted for erroneously as sales. The terms of the credit agreements specified: (1) a floating interest payment based on a spread over 90-day LIBOR subject to a cap; (2) an amortization schedule tied to the scheduled amortization of the underlying mortgage loans subject to a maximum maturity of 10 years; (3) mandatory prepayments as a result of actual prepayments from the underlying mortgages; and (4) an option to Doral to prepay the loan without penalty at any time.
     On May 31, 2006, First BanCorp received a cash payment from Doral, substantially reducing the balance of approximately $2.9 billion in secured commercial loans to approximately $450 million as of that date. In connection with the repayment, the Corporation and Doral entered into a sharing agreement on May 25, 2006 with respect to certain profits or losses that Doral would incur as part of the sales of the mortgages that previously collateralized the commercial loans. First BanCorp agreed to reimburse Doral for 40% of the net losses incurred by Doral as a result of sales or securitization of the mortgages, subject to certain conditions and subject to a maximum reimbursement of $9.5 million, which would be reduced proportionately to the extent that Doral did not sell the mortgages. As a result of the loss sharing agreement and the extinguishment of the secured commercial loans by Doral, the Corporation

70


recorded a net loss of $10.6 million, composed of losses realized as part of the loss sharing agreement and the difference between the carrying value of the loans and the net payment received from Doral.
     In connection with the repayment, Doral and First BanCorp also agreed to share the profits, if any, received from any subsequent sales or securitization of the mortgage loans, in the same proportion that the Corporation shared in the losses, subject to a maximum of $9.5 million.
     During the first quarter of 2007, the Corporation entered into various agreements with R&G Financial Corporation (“R&G Financial”) relating to prior transactions accounted for as commercial loans secured by mortgage loans and pass-through trust certificates from R&G Financial subsidiaries. First, through a mortgage payment agreement, R&G Financial paid the Corporation approximately $50 million to reduce the commercial loan that R&G Premier Bank, R&G Financial’s banking subsidiary, had outstanding with the Corporation. In addition, the remaining balance of the loans secured by mortgage loans of approximately $271 million was re-documented as a secured loan from the Corporation to R&G Financial. The terms of the credit agreement specified: (1) a floating interest payment based on a spread over 90-day LIBOR; (2) repayment of the loan in arrears in sixty equal consecutive monthly installments of principal (scheduled amortization plus any unscheduled principal recoveries) and interest maturing on February 22, 2012; (3) delivery by R&G Financial to the Corporation and maintenance at all times of a first priority security interest with a collateral value as a percentage of loans of 103% for FHA/VA mortgage loans, 105% for conventional conforming mortgage loans and 111% of conventional non-conforming mortgage loans; and (4) R&G Financial may, at its option, prepay the loan without premium or penalty. Second, R&G Financial and the Corporation amended various agreements involving, as of the date of the transaction, approximately $183.8 million of securities collateralized by loans that were originally sold through five grantor trusts. The modifications to the original agreements allow the Corporation to treat these transactions as “true sales” for accounting and legal purposes and recharacterize the loans as securities collateralized by loans. As a result of the agreements and the partial extinguishment of the secured commercial loan, the Corporation recorded a net gain of $2.5 million related to the difference between the carrying value of the loans, the net payment received and the fair value of the securities received from R&G Financial.
     For 2007, the Corporation recorded a gain of $2.8 million on the sale of the credit card portfolio pursuant to a strategic alliance reached with a U.S. financial institution, compared to a gain of $0.5 million recorded in 2006.
     Higher income from service charges on loans, which increased by $0.9 million or 16% as compared to 2006, was due to the increase in the loan portfolio volume driven by new originations. Loan originations for 2007 amounted to $4.1 billion.

71


Non-Interest Expense
     The following table presents the components of non-interest expenses:
                        
 2008 2007 2006  2009 2008 2007 
 (In thousands)  (In thousands) 
Employees’ compensation and benefits $141,853 $140,363 $127,523  $132,734 $141,853 $140,363 
Occupancy and equipment 61,818 58,894 54,440  62,335 61,818 58,894 
Deposit insurance premium 10,111 6,687 1,614  40,582 10,111 6,687 
Other taxes, insurance and supervisory fees 22,868 21,293 17,881  20,870 22,868 21,293 
Professional fees — recurring 12,572 13,480 11,455  12,980 12,572 13,480 
Professional fees — non-recurring 3,237 7,271 20,640  2,237 3,237 7,271 
Servicing and processing fees 9,918 6,574 7,297  10,174 9,918 6,574 
Business promotion 17,565 18,029 17,672  14,158 17,565 18,029 
Communications 8,856 8,562 9,165  8,283 8,856 8,562 
Net loss on REO operations 21,373 2,400 18  21,863 21,373 2,400 
Other 23,200 24,290 20,258  25,885 23,200 24,290 
              
Total $333,371 $307,843 $287,963  $352,101 $333,371 $307,843 
              
2009 compared to 2008
Non-interest expenses increased $18.7 million to $352.1 million for 2009 primarily reflecting:
§An increase of $30.5 million in the FDIC deposit insurance premium, including $8.9 million for the special assessment levied by the FDIC in 2009 and increases in regular assessment rates. The FDIC increased its insurance premium rates to banks in 2009 due to losses to the FDIC insurance fund as a result of bank failures during 2008 and 2009, coupled with additional losses that the FDIC projected for the future due to anticipated additional bank failures.
§A $4.0 million impairment of the core deposit intangible of FirstBank Florida, recorded in 2009 as part of other non-interest expenses. The core deposit intangible represents the value of the premium paid to acquire core deposits of an institution. Core deposit intangible impairment occurs when the present value of expected future earnings attributed to maintaining the core deposit base diminishes. Factors which contributed to the impairment include deposit run-off and a shift of customers to time certificates.
§A $1.8 million increase in the reserve for probable losses on outstanding unfunded loan commitments recorded as part of other non-interest expenses. The reserve for unfunded loan commitments is an estimate of the losses inherent in off-balance sheet loan commitments at the balance sheet date, and it was mainly related to outstanding construction loans commitments. It is calculated by multiplying an estimated loss factor by an estimated probability of funding, and then by the period-end amounts for unfunded commitments. The reserve for unfunded loan commitments is included as part of accounts payable and other liabilities in the consolidated statement of financial condition.

79


The aforementioned increases were partially offset by decreases in certain controllable expenses such as:
§A $9.1 million decrease in employees’ compensation and benefit expenses, mainly due to a lower headcount and reductions in bonuses, incentive compensation and overtime costs. The number of full time equivalent employees decreased by 163, or 6%, during 2009.
§A $3.4 million decrease in business promotion expenses due to a lower level of marketing activities.
§A $1.1 million decrease in taxes, other than income taxes, mainly driven by a decrease in municipal taxes which are assessed based on taxable gross revenues.
     The Corporation continued to reduce costs through corporate-wide efforts to focus on its core business, including cost-cutting initiatives. The efficiency ratio for 2009 was 53.24% compared to 55.33% for 2008.
     2008 compared to 2007
     Non-interest expenses increased 8% to $333.4 million for 2008 from $307.8 million for 2007. The increase iswas principally attributable to a higher net loss on REO operations and increases in the deposit insurance premium expense and occupancy and equipment expenses, partially offset by lower professional fees.
     The net loss on REO operations increased by approximately $19.0 million for 2008, as compared to the previous year, mainly due to a higher inventory of repossessed properties and declining real estate prices, mainly in the U.S. mainland, that have caused write-downs onof the value of repossessed properties. A significant portion of the losses iswas related to foreclosed properties from the Corporate Banking operations in Miami,Florida, including a $5.3 million write-down to the value of the last remaininga single foreclosed project in the United States as of December 31, 2008 which is expected to be sold in the first half of 2009.2008. Higher losses were also observed in Puerto Rico due to a higher inventory and recent trends in sales.
     The deposit insurance premium expense increased by $3.4 million as the Corporation used available one-time credits to offset the premium increase in 2007 resulting from a new assessment system adopted by the FDIC and also attributable to the increase in the deposit base. On February 27, 2009, the FDIC approved an emergency special assessment of 20 cents per $100 insured deposits that would be collected in the third quarter of 2009 and agreed to increase fees it will begin charging banks in April to a range of 12 cents to 16 cents per $100 deposit. The Corporation expects an estimated charge of approximately $25 million resulting from the emergency special assessment in 2009 and an increase of approximately $13 million in the deposit insurance premium expense for 2009, as compared to 2008, as a result of the increase in the regular assessment rate.
     Occupancy and equipment expenses increased by $2.9 million primarily to support the growth of the Corporation’s operations as well as increases in utility costs.
     Employees’compensation and benefitsbenefit expenses increased by $1.5 million for 2008, as compared to the previous year, primarily due to higher average compensation and related fringe benefits, partially offset by a decrease of $2.8 million in stock-based compensation expenses and the impact in 2007 of the accrual of approximately $3.3 million for a voluntary separation program established by the Corporation as part of its cost saving strategies. The Corporation has been able to continue the growth of its operations without incurring in substantial additional operating expenses. The Corporation’s total headcount has decreased as compared to December 31, 2007 as a result of the voluntary separation program completed earlier in 2008 and reductions by attrition. These decreases have been partially offset by increases due to the acquisition of the Virgin Islands Community Bank (“VICB”) in the first quarter of 2008 and to reinforcement of audit and credit risk management personnel.

72


     Professional fees decreased by $4.9 million for the 2008 year, as compared to 2007, primarily attributable to lower legal, accounting and consulting fees due to, among other things, the settlement of legal and regulatory matters.

80


2007 compared to 2006
     The Corporation’s non-interest expenses for 2007 increased by $19.9 million, or 7%, compared to 2006. The increase in non-interest expenses was mainly due to increases in employees’ compensation and benefits as well as deposit insurance premium expenses, occupancy and equipment expenses, other taxes and insurance fees, partially offset by a decrease in professional fees.
     Employees’ compensation and benefits expenses for 2007 increased by $12.8 million, or 10%, compared to 2006. The increase in employees’ compensation and benefits expenses was primarily due to increases in the average compensation and related fringe benefits paid to employees coupled with the accrual of approximately $3.3 million for a voluntary separation program established by the Corporation as part of its cost saving strategies.
     For the year ended December 31, 2007, the deposit insurance premium expense increased by $5.1 million, as compared to 2006. The increase in the deposit insurance premium expense was due to changes in the premium calculation adopted by the FDIC during 2007.
     Occupancy and equipment expenses for 2007 increased by $4.5 million, or 8%, compared to 2006. The increase in occupancy and equipment expenses in 2007 is mainly attributable to increases in costs associated with the expansion of the Corporation’s branch network and loan origination offices.
     Other taxes, insurance and supervisory fees increased by $3.4 million, or 19%, compared to 2006 due to a higher expense related to prepaid municipal and property taxes recorded during 2007.
     For 2007, other expenses increased by $6.4 million, or 32%, compared to 2006. The increase in other expenses for 2007 was mainly due to a $3.3 million increase related to costs associated with capital raising efforts in 2007 not qualifying for capitalization coupled with increased costs associated with foreclosure actions on the aforementioned troubled loan relationship in Miami, Florida.
     Professional fees decreased during 2007 by $11.3 million, or 35%, compared to 2006. The decrease was primarily attributable to lower legal, accounting and consulting fees due to the conclusion during the third quarter of 2006 of the internal review conducted by the Corporation’s Audit Committee and the restatement process.
Income Tax ProvisionTaxes
     Income tax expense includes Puerto Rico and Virgin Islands income taxes as well as applicable U.S. federal and state taxes. The Corporation is subject to Puerto Rico income tax on its income from all sources. As a Puerto Rico corporation, First BanCorp is treated as a foreign corporation for U.S. income tax purposes and is generally subject to United States income tax only on its income from sources within the United States or income effectively connected with the conduct of a trade or business within the United States. Any such tax paid is creditable, withwithin certain conditions and limitations, against the Corporation’s Puerto Rico tax liability. The Corporation is also subject to U.S. Virgin Islands taxes on its income from sources within thisthat jurisdiction. Any such tax paid is creditable against the Corporation’s Puerto Rico tax liability, subject to certain conditions and limitations.
     Under the Puerto Rico Internal Revenue Code of 1994, as amended (“PR Code”), First BanCorp is subject to a maximum statutory tax rate of 39%, except that in 2005 and 2006 an additional transitory tax rate of 2.5% was signed into law by. In 2009 the Governor of Puerto Rico. In August 2005, the Government of Puerto Rico Government approved Act No. 7 (the “Act”), to stimulate Puerto Rico’s economy and to reduce the Puerto Rico Government’s fiscal deficit. The Act imposes a transitoryseries of temporary and permanent measures, including the imposition of a 5% surtax over the total income tax rate of 2.5% that increaseddetermined, which is applicable to corporations, among others, whose combined income exceeds $100,000, effectively resulting in an increase in the maximum statutory tax rate from 39.0%39% to 41.5% for a two-year period. On May 13, 2006, with40.95% and an effective date of January 1, 2006, the Governor of Puerto Rico approved an additional transitory tax rate of 2.0% applicable only to companies covered by the Puerto Rico Banking Act, as amended, such as FirstBank, which raised the maximumincrease in capital gain statutory tax rate from 15% to 43.5%15.75%. This temporary measure is effective for the 2006 taxable year.tax years that commenced after December 31, 2008 and before January 1, 2012. The PR Code also includes an alternative minimum tax

73


of 22% that applies if the Corporation’s regular income tax liability is less than the alternative minimum tax requirements.
     The Corporation has maintained an effective tax rate lower than the maximum statutory rate mainly by investing in government obligations and mortgage-backed securities exempt from U.S. and Puerto Rico income taxes and by doing business through IBEs of the Corporation and the Bank and through the Bank’s subsidiary, FirstBank Overseas Corporation, in which the interest income and gain on sales is exempt from Puerto Rico and U.S. income taxation. Under the Act, all IBEs are subject to a special 5% tax on their net income not otherwise subject to tax pursuant to the PR Code. This temporary measure is also effective for tax years that commenced after December 31, 2008 and before January 1, 2012. The IBEs and FirstBank Overseas Corporation were created under the International Banking Entity Act of Puerto Rico, which provides for total Puerto Rico tax exemption on net income derived by IBEs operating in Puerto Rico. IBEs that operate as a unit of a bank pay income taxes at normal rates to the extent that the IBEs’ net income exceeds 20% of the bank’s total net taxable income.
     For additional information relating to income taxes, see Note 2527 to the Corporation’s audited financial statements for the year ended December 31, 20082009 included in Item 8 of this Form 10-K, including the reconciliation of the statutory to the effective income tax rate for 2009, 2008 and 2007.
2009 compared to 2008
     For 2009, the Corporation recognized an income tax expense of $4.5 million, compared to an income tax benefit of $31.7 million for 2008. The fluctuation in income tax expense for 2009 mainly resulted from non-cash charges of approximately $184.4 million to increase the valuation allowance for the Corporation’s deferred tax asset. As of December 31, 2009, the deferred tax asset, net of a valuation allowance of $191.7 million, amounted to $109.2 million compared to $128.0 million as of December 31, 2008.
     Accounting for income taxes requires that companies assess whether a valuation allowance should be recorded against their deferred tax assets based on the consideration of all available evidence, using a “more likely than not” realization standard. Valuation allowances are established, when necessary, to reduce deferred tax assets to the amount that is more likely than not to be realized. In making such assessment, significant weight is to be given to evidence that can be objectively verified, including both positive and negative evidence. The accounting for income taxes guidance requires the consideration of all sources of taxable income available to realize the deferred tax asset, including the future reversal of existing temporary differences, future taxable income exclusive of reversing temporary differences and carryforwards, taxable income in carryback years and tax planning strategies. In estimating taxes, management assesses the relative merits and risks of the appropriate tax treatment of transactions taking into account statutory, judicial and regulatory guidance, and recognized tax benefits only when deemed probable.

81


     In assessing the weight of positive and negative evidence, a significant negative factor that resulted in the increase of the valuation allowance was that the Corporation’s banking subsidiary FirstBank Puerto Rico was in a three-year historical cumulative loss as of the end of the year 2009, mainly as a result of charges to the provision for loan and lease losses, especially in the construction portfolio both in Puerto Rico and the United States, resulting from the economic downturn. As of December 31, 2009, management concluded that $109.2 million of the deferred tax assets will be realized. In assessing the likelihood of realizing the deferred tax assets, management has considered all four sources of taxable income mentioned above and even though sufficient profits are expected in the next seven years to realized the deferred tax asset, given current uncertain economic conditions, the Company has only relied on tax-planning strategies as the main source of taxable income to realize the deferred tax asset amount. Among the most significant tax-planning strategies identified are: (i) sale of appreciated assets, (ii) consolidation of profitable and unprofitable companies (in Puerto Rico each Company files a separate tax return; no consolidated tax returns are permitted), and (iii) deferral of deductions without affecting its utilization. Management will continue monitoring the likelihood of realizing the deferred tax assets in future periods. If future events differ from management’s December 31, 2009 assessment, an additional valuation allowance may need to be established which may have a material adverse effect on the Corporation’s results of operations. Similarly, to the extent the realization of a portion, or all, of the tax asset becomes “more likely than not” based on changes in circumstances (such as, improved earnings, changes in tax laws or other relevant changes), a reversal of that portion of the deferred tax asset valuation allowance will then be recorded.
     The increase in the valuation allowance does not have any impact on the Corporation’s liquidity, nor does such an allowance preclude the Corporation from using tax losses, tax credits or other deferred tax assets in the future.
     Partially offsetting the impact of the increase in the valuation allowance, was the reversal of approximately $19 million of Unrecognized Tax Benefits (“UTBs”) as further discussed below. The income tax provision in 2009 was also impacted by adjustments to deferred tax amounts as a result of the aforementioned changes to the PR Code enacted tax rates. The effect of a higher temporary statutory tax rate over the normal statutory tax rate resulted in an additional income tax benefit of $10.4 million for 2009 that was partially offset by an income tax provision of $6.6 million related to the special 5% tax on the operations of FirstBank Overseas Corporation. Deferred tax amounts have been adjusted for the effect of the change in the income tax rate considering the enacted tax rate expected to apply to taxable income in the period in which the deferred tax asset or liability is expected to be settled or realized.
     During the second quarter of 2009, the Corporation reversed UTBs by $10.8 million and related accrued interest of $5.3 million due to the lapse of the statute of limitations for the 2004 taxable year. Also, in July 2009, the Corporation entered into an agreement with the Puerto Rico Department of the Treasury to conclude an income tax audit and to eliminate all possible income and withholding tax deficiencies related to taxable years 2005, 2006, 2007 and 2006.2008. As a result of such agreement, the Corporation reversed during the third quarter of 2009 the remaining UTBs and related interest by approximately $2.9 million, net of the payment made to the Puerto Rico Department of the Treasury in connection with the conclusion of the tax audit. There were no UTBs outstanding as of December 31, 2009. Refer to Note 27 to the Corporation’s financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2009 included in Item 8 of this Form 10-K for additional information.
     2008 compared to 2007
     For 2008, the Corporation recognized an income tax benefit of $31.7 million compared to an income tax expense of $21.6 million for 2007. The fluctuation iswas mainly related to lower taxable income. A significant portion of revenues was derived from tax-exempt assets and operations conducted through the IBE, FirstBank Overseas Corporation. Also, the positive fluctuation in financial results was impacted by two transactions: (i) a reversal of $10.6 million of UTBs during the second quarter of 2008 for positions taken on income tax returns, recorded under the provisions of FIN 48, as explained below, and (ii) the recognition of an income tax benefit of $5.4 million in connection with an agreement entered into with the Puerto Rico Department of Treasury during the first quarter of 2008 that established a multi-year allocation schedule for deductibility of the $74.25 million payment made by the Corporation during 2007 to settle a securities class action suit. Also, higher deferred tax benefits were recorded in connection with a higher provision for loan and lease losses.
     During the second quarter of 2008, the Corporation reversed UTBs byof approximately $7.1 million and accrued interest of $3.5 million as a result of a lapse of the applicable statute of limitations for the 2003 taxable year. The amounts of UTBs may increase or decrease in the future for various reasons, including changes in the amounts for current tax year positions, the expiration of open income tax returns due to the statute of limitations, changes in management’s judgment about the level of uncertainty, the status of examinations, litigation and legislative activity and the addition or elimination of uncertain tax positions. For the outstanding UTBs of $22.4 million (including $6.8 million of accrued interest), the Corporation cannot make any reasonable reliable estimate of the timing of future cash flows or changes, if any, associated with such obligations.
     As of December 31, 2008, the Corporation evaluated its ability to realize the deferred tax asset and concluded, based on the evidence available, that it is more likely than not that some of the deferred tax asset will not be realized and thus, established a valuation allowance of $7.3 million, compared to a valuation allowance amounting to $4.9 million as of December 31, 2007. As of December 31, 2008, the deferred tax asset, net of the valuation allowance of $7.3 million, amounted to approximately $128.0 million compared to $90.1 million as of December 31, 2007.
     For additional information relating to income taxes, refer to Note 25 of the Corporation’s audited financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2008 included in Item 8 of this Form 10-K.
2007 compared to 2006
     For the year ended December 31, 2007, the Corporation recognized an income tax expense of $21.6 million, compared to $27.4 million in 2006. The decrease in income tax expense was mainly due to lower taxable income coupled with the effect of a lower statutory tax rate in Puerto Rico for 2007 (39% in 2007 compared to 43.5% in 2006). As of December 31, 2007, the Corporation evaluated its ability to realize the deferred tax asset and concluded, based on the evidence available, that it is more likely than not that some of the deferred tax asset will not be realized and thus, established a valuation allowance of $4.9 million, compared to a valuation allowance amounting to $6.1 million as of December 31, 2006. As of December 31, 2007, the deferred tax asset, net of the valuation allowance of $4.9 million, amounted to approximately $90.1 million compared to $162.1 million as of December 31, 2006. The significant

7482


decrease in the deferred tax asset is due to the reversal during the third quarter of 2007 of the deferred tax asset related to the class action lawsuit contingency of $74.25 million recorded as of December 31, 2005 and due to the tax impact of the adoption of SFAS 159, on January 1, 2007, of approximately $58.7 million.  The Corporation reached an agreement with the lead class action plaintiff during 2007 and payments totaling the previously reserved amount of $74.25 million were made.
OPERATING SEGMENTS
     Based upon the Corporation’s organizational structure and the information provided to the Chief Operating Decision MakerExecutive Officer of the Corporation and, to a lesser extent, to the Board of Directors, the operating segments are driven primarily by the Corporation’s legal entities.lines of business for its operations in Puerto Rico, the Corporation’s principal market, and by geographic areas for its operations outside of Puerto Rico. As of December 31, 2008,2009, the Corporation had foursix reportable segments: Commercial and Corporate Banking; Mortgage Banking; Consumer (Retail) Banking; and Treasury and Investments. There is also an Other category reflecting other legal entities reported separately on a combined basis.Investments; United States operations and Virgin Islands operations. Management determined the reportable segments based on the internal reporting used to evaluate performance and to assess where to allocate resources. Other factors such as the Corporation’s organizational chart, nature of the products, distribution channels and the economic characteristics of the products were also considered in the determination of the reportable segments. For information regarding First BanCorp’s reportable segments, please refer to Note 3133 “Segment Information” to the Corporation’s audited financial statements for the year ended December 31, 20082009 included in Item 8 of this Form 10-K.
     Starting in the fourth quarter of 2009, the Corporation has realigned its reporting segments to better reflect how it views and manages its business. Two additional operating segments were created to evaluate the operations conducted by the Corporation outside of Puerto Rico. Operations conducted in the United States and in the Virgin Islands are now individually evaluated as separate operating segments. This realignment in the segment reporting essentially reflects the effect of restructuring initiatives, including the merger of FirstBank Florida operations with and into FirstBank, and will allow the Corporation to better present the results from its growth focus. Prior to the third quarter of 2009, the operating segments were driven primarily by the Corporation’s legal entities. FirstBank operations conducted in the Virgin Islands and through its loan production office in Miami, Florida were reflected in the Corporation’s then four reportable segments (Commercial and Corporate Banking; Mortgage Banking; Consumer (Retail) Banking; Treasury and Investments) while the operations conducted by FirstBank Florida were reported as part of a category named “Other”. In the third quarter of 2009, as a result of the aforementioned merger, the operations of FirstBank Florida were reported as part of the four reportable segments. The change in the fourth quarter reflected a further realignment of the organizational structure as a result of management changes. Prior period amounts have been reclassified to conform to current period presentation. These changes did not have an impact on the previously reported consolidated results of the Corporation.
     The accounting policies of the segments are the same as those described in Note 1 — “Nature of Business and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies” to the Corporation’s audited financial statements for the year ended December 31, 20082009 included in Item 8 of this Form 10-K. The Corporation evaluates the performance of the segments based on net interest income, after the estimated provision for loan and lease losses, non-interest income and direct non-interest expenses. The segments are also evaluated based on the average volume of their interest-earning assets less the allowance for loan and lease losses.
     The Treasury and Investment segment loanslends funds to the Consumer (Retail) Banking, Mortgage Banking and Commercial and Corporate Banking segments to finance their lending activities and borrows funds from those segments. The Consumer (Retail) Banking segment also loanslends funds to other segments. The interest rates charged or credited by Treasury and Investment and the Consumer (Retail) Banking segments are allocated based on market rates. The difference between the allocated interest income or expense and the Corporation’s actual net interest income from centralized management of funding costs is reported in the Treasury and Investments segment. The Other category is mainly composed of the operations of FirstBank Florida as well as finance leases and insurance and other miscellaneous products that were adversely affected by deteriorating economic conditions. This category, in particular FirstBank Florida was negatively impacted by the increase in the provision for loan and lease losses due to the deterioration in the credit quality of this portfolio and declining prices in the real estate market in the United States. In addition, an other-than-temporary impairment charges of $4.2 million were recorded in connection with auto industry corporate bonds held by FirstBank Florida.
Consumer(Retail)Banking
     The Consumer (Retail) Banking segment mainly consists of the Corporation’s consumer lending and deposit-taking activities conducted mainly through its branch network and loan centers.centers in Puerto Rico. Loans to consumers include auto, boat, lines of credit, personal loans and personal loans.finance leases. Deposit products include interest bearing and non-interest bearing checking and savings accounts, Individual Retirement Accounts (IRA) and retail certificates of deposit. Retail

83


deposits gathered through each branch of FirstBank’s retail network serve as one of the funding sources for the lending and investment activities.
     Consumer lending has been mainly driven by auto loan originations. The Corporation follows a strategy of providingseeking to provide outstanding service to selected auto dealers that provide the channel for the bulk of the Corporation’s auto loan originations. This strategy is directly linked to our commercial lending activities as the Corporation maintains strong and stable auto floor plan relationships, which are the foundation of a successful auto loan generation operation. The CorporationCorporation’s commercial relations with floor plan dealers isare strong and directly benefitsbenefit the Corporation’s consumer lending operation and are managed as part of the consumer banking activities.

75


     Personal loans and, to a lesser extent, marine financing and a small revolving credit portfolio also contribute to interest income generated on consumer lending. Credit card accounts which are issued under the Bank’s name through an alliance with FIA Card Services (Bank of America), whowhich bears the credit risk, grew more than 100% from December 31, 2007.risk. Management plans to continue to be active in the consumer loans market, applying the Corporation’s strict underwriting standards. Other activities included in this segment are finance leases and insurance activities in Puerto Rico.
     The highlights of the Consumer (Retail) Banking segment financial results for the year ended December 31, 20082009 include the following:
  Segment income before taxes for the year ended December 31, 20082009 was $46.7$20.9 million compared to $82.9$21.8 million and $139.6$37.8 million for the years ended December 31, 20072008 and 2006,2007, respectively.
 
  Net interest income for the year ended December 31, 20082009 was $173.0$149.6 million compared to $205.3$166.0 million and $238.5$174.3 million for the years ended December 31, 20072008 and 2006,2007, respectively. The decrease in net interest income reflects a diminished consumer loan portfolio due to principal repayments and charge-offs relating to the auto and personal loans portfolio coupled with the sale of approximately $15.6 million during 2007 of the Corporation’s credit card portfolio.(including finance leases). This portfolio is mainly composed of fixed-rate loans financed with shorter-term borrowings;borrowings thus positively affected in a declining interest rate scenario,scenario; however, this was more than offset by a decrease in the amount credited to this segment for its deposit-taking activities due to the decline in interest rates and the lower volume of loans, resulting in a decrease in net interest income in 2009 as compared to 2008 and in 2008 as compared to 2007.
 
  The provision for loan and lease losses for 20082009 decreased by $4.3$18.0 million compared to the same period in 20072008 and increased by $20.2$6.7 million when comparing 20072008 with the same period in 2006.2007. The decrease in 2008, as compared to 2007, isthe provision was mainly related to the lower amount of the consumer loan portfolio, a relative stability in delinquency and non-performing levels, and a decrease in net charge-offs attributable in part to the changes in underwriting standards implemented since late 2005 and the originations using these new underwriting standards of new consumer loans to replace maturing consumer loans. This portfolioloans that had an average life of approximately four years. The increase in the provision for loan and lease losses for 2007,2008, compared to 2006,2007, was mainly due to a higher general reserve for the Puerto Rico consumer loan portfolio, particularly auto loans, as a result of weakadjustments to loss factors based on economic conditions in Puerto Rico. Increasing trends in non-performing loans and charge-offs experienced during 2007 and 2006 were affected by the fiscal and economic situation of Puerto Rico. Puerto Rico has been in the midst of a recession since the third quarter of 2005.indicators.
 
  Non-interest income for the year ended December 31, 20082009 was $28.8$32.0 million compared to $27.3$35.6 million and $23.5$32.5 million for the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively. The decrease for 2009, as compared to 2008, was mainly related to lower insurance income and 2006, respectively.a reduction in income from vehicle rental activities partially offset by higher service charges on deposit accounts and higher ATM interchange fee income. As part of the Corporation’s strategies to focus on its core business, the Corporation divested its short-term rental business during the fourth quarter of 2009. The increase for 2008, as compared to 2007, iswas mainly related to higher point of sale (POS) and ATM interchange fee income caused by a change in the calculation of interchange fees charged between financial institutions in Puerto Rico from a fixed fee calculation to a percentage of the sale calculation since the second half of 2007. The increase in non-interest income for 2007, as compared to 2006, was driven by a gain on sale of a credit card portfolio of $2.8 million.
 
  Direct non-interest expenses for the year ended December 31, 20082009 were $103.8$98.3 million compared to $94.1$99.2 million and $86.9$95.2 million for the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively. The decrease in direct non-interest expenses for 2009, as compared to 2008, was primarily due to reductions in marketing and 2006, respectively.occupancy expenses, mainly electricity costs, partially offset by the increase in the FDIC insurance premium associated with increases in the regular assessment rates and the special fee levied in 2009. The increase in direct operating expensenon-interest expenses for 2008, compared to 2007, was mainly due to increases in compensation, marketing collection efforts and in the FDIC insurance premium. The increase for 2007, as compared to 2006, was mainly due to increases in employees’ compensation and benefits and occupancy and equipment. The increase in employees’ compensation and benefits was mainly from increases in the headcount in the Corporation’s retail bank branch network coupled with increases in average salary and employee benefits to support the growth of the segment.


Commercial and Corporate Banking
     The Commercial and Corporate Banking segment consists of the Corporation’s lending and other services for the public sector and specialized industries such as healthcare, tourism, financial institutions, food and beverage, shopping centers and middle-market clients. The Commercial and Corporate Banking segment offers commercial

76


loans, including commercial real estate and construction loans, and other products such as cash management and business management services. A substantial portion of this portfolio is secured either by the underlying value of the real estate collateral, and collateral and the personal guarantees of the borrowers are taken in abundance of caution. Although commercial loans involve greater credit risk than a typical residential mortgage loan because they are larger in size and more risk is concentrated in a single borrower, the Corporation has and maintains an effectivea credit risk management infrastructure designed to mitigate potential losses associated with commercial lending, including strong underwriting and loan review functions, sales of loan participations and continuous monitoring of concentrations within portfolios.
     For this segment, the Corporation follows a strategy aimed to cater to customer needs in the commercial loans middle market segment by buildingseeking to build strong relationships and offering financial solutions that meet customers’ unique needs. Starting in 2005, the Corporation expanded its distribution network and participation in the commercial loans middle market segment by focusing on customers with financing needs of up to $5 million. The Corporation established 5 regional offices that provide coverage throughout Puerto Rico. The offices are staffed with sales, marketing and credit officers able to provide a high level of personalized service and prompt decision-making.
     The highlights of the Commercial and Corporate Banking segment financial results for the year ended December 31, 20082009 include the following:
  Segment incomeloss before taxes for the year ended December 31, 20082009 was $21.2$129.8 million compared to $77.8income of $56.9 million and $123.8$78.6 million for the years ended December 31, 20072008 and 2006,2007, respectively.
 
  Net interest income for the year ended December 31, 20082009 was $136.9$180.3 million compared to $135.9$112.3 million and $154.7$104.8 million for the years ended December 31, 20072008 and 2006,2007, respectively. The increase in net interest income for 2009 and 2008, as compared to 2007, iswas related to both an increase in the average volume of earning assets driven by new commercial loan originations and lower interest rates charged by other business segments due to the decline in short-term interest rates in 2008 that more than offset lower loan yields due to the repricing of this portfolio and thesignificant increase in non-accrual loans. Also,loans and to the repricing at lower rates. However, the Corporation has took initial steps to obtain a higher pricingis actively increasing spreads on its variable-rate commercial loan portfoliorenewals given the current market environment. The decreaseDuring 2009, the Corporation increased the use of interest rate floors in new commercial and construction loan agreements and renewals to protect net interest income for 2007, compared to 2006, was mainly driven by a decreasemargins going forward. The increase in the average volume of interest-earning assets. The decrease in the segment’s average volume of interest-earningearning assets was mainlyprimarily due to credit facilities extended to the substantial partial repaymentPuerto Rico Government and its political subdivisions. As of $2.4December 31, 2009, the Corporation had $1.2 billion received from Doral in May 2006 that reducedoutstanding of credit facilities granted to the segment’s outstanding secured commercial loan from local financial institutions. The repayment also reduced the Corporation’s loans-to-one borrower exposure.Puerto Rico Government and its political subdivisions.
 
  The provision for loan and lease losses for 20082009 was $78.8$273.8 million compared to $41.2$35.5 million and $7.9$12.5 million for 20072008 and 2006,2007, respectively. The increase in the provision for loan and lease losses for 20082009 was mainly driven by the continuing pressures of a weak Puerto Rico economy and a stagnant housing market that were the main reasons for the increase in non-accrual loans, the migration of loans to higher risk categories (including a significant increase in impaired loans) and the increase in charge-offs. These have resulted in higher specific reserves relating tofor impaired loans and increases in loss factors used for the condo-conversion loan portfoliodetermination of the Corporation’s Corporate Banking operation in Miami, Florida. The increase was also related to the increase in the amount of commercial and construction impaired loans in Puerto Rico due to deteriorating economic conditions.general reserve. Refer to the “Provision for Loan and Lease Losses” discussion above and to the “Risk Management – Allowance for Loan and Lease Losses and Non-performing Assets” discussion below for additional information with respect to the credit quality of the Corporation’s commercial and construction loan portfolio. The increase in 2007, compared to 2006,the provision for loan and lease losses for 2008 was mainly driven by higher general reserves on the Corporate Banking operations construction loan portfolio in Miami, Florida due to the slowdown of the U.S. housing market, an $8.1 million charge due to the collateral impairment on the previously discussed troubled loan relationship, and to the increase in the loan portfolio.amount of commercial and construction impaired loans in Puerto Rico due to deteriorating economic conditions.

85


  Total non-interest income for the year ended December 31, 20082009 amounted to $4.6$5.7 million compared to a non-interest income of $6.3$4.6 million and non-interest loss of $6.1$6.2 million for the years ended December 31, 20072008 and 20062007, respectively. The fluctuationincrease in non-interest income for 2009, as compared to 2008, was mainly attributable to higher non-deferrable loans fees such as agent, commitment and drawing fees from commercial customers. Also, an increase in cash management fees from corporate customers contributed to the increase in non-interest income. The increase in non-interest income for 2008 and 2007 was mainly attributable to the impact on earnings of agreements$2.5 million gain resulting from an agreement entered into with otheranother local financial institutionsinstitution for the partial extinguishment of secured commercial loans extended to such institutions (a gain of $2.5institution. Aside from this transaction, non-interest income for the Commercial and Corporate Banking Segment increased by $0.9 million recorded in 2007connection with higher fees on cash management services provided to corporate customers.
Direct non-interest expenses for 2009 were $41.9 million compared to $24.5 million and $20.1 million for 2008 and 2007, respectively. The increase for 2009, as compared to 2008, was primarily due to the portion of the increase in the FDIC deposit insurance premium allocated to this segment; this was partially offset by reductions in compensation expense. The increase for 2008, as compared to 2007, was also mainly due to the portion of the increase in the FDIC insurance premium as increase in compensation and a higher loss in REO operations, primarily due to the increase in the volume of $10.6 million recorded in 2006). Asiderepossessed properties and writedowns.

77


from these transactions, non-interest income for the Commercial and Corporate Banking Segment increased by $0.9 million in connection with higher fees on cash management services provided to corporate customers.
Direct non-interest expenses for 2008 were $41.6 million compared to $23.2 million and $16.9 million for 2007 and 2006, respectively. The increase for 2008, as compared to 2007, was mainly due to a higher loss in REO operations, primarily expenses and write-downs related to foreclosed condo-conversion projects in Miami, Florida. Refer to “Non-interest expenses” discussion above for additional information. The increase in direct operating expenses for 2007, as compared to 2006, was mainly due to increases in employees’ compensation due to increases in average salary and employee benefits and increases in REO operations losses associated with the aforementioned troubled loan relationship in Miami coupled with the expense allocated to this segment related to the FDIC insurance premium expense.
Mortgage Banking
     The Mortgage Banking segment conducts its operations mainly through FirstBank and its mortgage origination subsidiary, FirstMortgage. These operations consist of the origination, sale and servicing of a variety of residential mortgage loanloans products. Originations are sourced through different channels such as branches, mortgage brokersbankers and real estate brokers, and in association with new project developers. FirstMortgage focuses on originating residential real estate loans, some of which conform to Federal Housing Administration (“FHA”), Veterans Administration (“VA”) and Rural Development (“RD”) standards. Loans originated that meet FHA standards qualify for the federal agency’s insurance program whereas loans that meet VA and RD standards are guaranteed by their respective federal agencies. Mortgage loans that do not qualify under these programs are commonly referred to as conventional loans. Conventional real estate loans could be conforming and non-conforming. Conforming loans are residential real estate loans that meet the standards for sale under the FNMA and FHLMC programs whereas loans that do not meet the standards are referred to as non-conforming residential real estate loans. The Corporation’s strategy is to penetrate markets by providing customers with a variety of high quality mortgage products to serve their financial needs faster and simpler and at competitive prices.
The Mortgage Banking segment also acquires and sells mortgages in the secondary markets. Residential real estate conforming loans are sold to investors like FNMA and FHLMC. In December 2008, the Corporation obtained from GNMA, Commitment Authority to issue GNMA mortgage-backed securities. Under this program, in 2009, the Corporation will begin securitizingsecuritized and sellingsold FHA/VA mortgage loan production into the secondary markets.
     The highlights of the Mortgage Banking segment financial results for the year ended December 31, 20082009 include the following:
  Segment incomeloss before taxes for the year ended December 31, 20082009 was $16.9$14.3 million compared to $18.6income of $8.3 million and $24.4$7.2 million for the years ended December 31, 20072008 and 2006,2007, respectively.
 
  Net interest income for the year ended December 31, 20082009 was $47.2$39.2 million compared to $39.0$37.3 million and $43.4$27.6 million for the years ended December 31, 20072008 and 2006,2007, respectively. The increase in net interest income for 2009 and 2008 as compared to 2007, iswas mainly related to the decline in short-term rates during 2008.rates. This portfolio is principally composed of fixed-rate residential mortgage loans tied to long-term interest rates that are financed with shorter-term borrowings;borrowings, thus positively affected in a declining interest rate scenario as the one prevailing in 2009 and 2008. The increase in 2008 was also related to a higher portfolio, driven in 2009 by the purchase of approximately $205 million of residential mortgages that previously served as collateral for a commercial loan extended to R&G Financial, a Puerto Rican financial institution. The increase in the portfolio in 2008 was driven by mortgage loan originations. The decrease in net interest income for 2007, as compared to 2006, was principally due to declining loan yields on the residential mortgage loan portfolio resulting from the increase in non-performing loans.

86


  The provision for loan and lease losses for the year 20082009 was $9.8$29.7 million compared to $1.6$9.0 million and $4.0$1.6 million for the years ended December 31, 20072008 and 2006,2007, respectively. The increase in 2009 and 2008 as compared to 2007, was mainly related to the increase in the volume of non-performing loans due to deteriorating economic conditions in Puerto Rico and an increase in reserve factors to account for the continued recessionary economic conditions and the increase in charge-offs. The decrease in 2007, asnegative loss trends.

78


compared to 2006, was due to the fact that after a detailed review of the residential mortgage loan portfolio in 2006, the Corporation determined that it needed to increase its allowance for loan and lease losses based on the deterioration of the economic conditions in Puerto Rico and the increase in the home price index in Puerto Rico. The Corporation continues to update the analysis on a yearly basis, and in 2007 the Corporation obtained similar results than in 2006. As a consequence, the Corporation determined that the allowance for loan losses for the residential mortgage loan portfolio was at an adequate level.
  Non-interest income for the year ended December 31, 20082009 was $3.4$8.5 million compared to $3.0$2.7 million and $2.5$2.1 million for the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007, and 2006, respectively. The increase for 2009, as compared to 2008 was driven by approximately $4.6 million of capitalized servicing assets in connection with the securitization of approximately $305 million FHA/VA mortgage loans into GNMA MBS. For the first time in several years, the Corporation was engaged in the securitization of mortgage loans throughout 2009. The increase for 2008, as compared to 2007, was driven by a higher volume of loan sales in the secondary market. The increase for 2007, as compared to 2006, was driven by higher service charges on loans associated with the growth in the residential mortgage loan portfolio coupled with a negative lower-of-cost-or-market adjustment of $1.0 million recorded in 2006 to the loans-held-for-sale portfolio.
 
  Direct non-interest expenses for 20082009 were $23.9$32.3 million compared to $21.8$22.7 million and $17.5$20.9 million for 2008 and 2007, respectively. The increase for 2009, as compared to 2008, was also mainly related to the portion of the FDIC deposit insurance premium allocated to this segment, a higher loss on REO operations associated with a higher volume of repossessed properties and 2006, respectively.an increase in professional service fees. The increase for 2008, as compared to 2007, is related to technology related expenses incurred to improve the servicing of the mortgage loans as well as increases in compensation and, to a lesser extent, higher losses on REO operations in connection with a higher volume of repossessed properties and recent trends in sales. The increase in direct operating expenses for 2007, as compared to 2006, was mainly due to increases in employees’ average salary compensation and higher employer benefits. The Corporation has committed substantial resources to this segment during the past 4 years.
Treasury and Investments
     The Treasury and Investments segment is responsible for the Corporation’s treasury and investment portfoliomanagement functions. In the treasury function, which includes funding and treasury functions designed to manage and enhance liquidity. Thisliquidity management, this segment sells funds to the Commercial and Corporate Banking, Mortgage Banking, and Consumer (Retail) Banking segments to finance their lending activities and also purchases funds gathered by those segments. Funds not gathered by the different business units are obtained by the Treasury Division through wholesale channels, such as brokered deposits, Advances from the FHLB and repurchase agreements with investment securities, among others.
     Since the Corporation is a net borrower of funds, the securities portfolio does not result from the investment of excess funds. The securities portfolio is a leverage strategy for the purposes of liquidity management, interest rate management and earnings enhancement.
     The interest rates charged or credited by Treasury and Investments are based on market rates.
     The highlights of the Treasury and Investments segment financial results for the year ended December 31, 20082009 include the following:
  Segment income before taxes for the year ended December 31, 20082009 amounted to $106.3$163.1 million compared to losses$142.3 million for 2008 and of $14.5 million and $79.2$36.5 million for the years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively.2007.
 
  Net interest income for the year ended December 31, 20082009 was $87.2$86.1 million compared to a loss of $4.5$123.4 million and a loss of $63.2$46.5 million for the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively. The decrease in 2009, as compared to 2008, was mainly due to the decrease in the amount credited to this segment for its deposit-taking activities due to the decline in interest rates and 2006, respectively.due to lower yields on investment securities. This was partially offset by reductions in the cost of funding as maturing brokered CDs were replaced with shorter-term CDs at lower prevailing rates and very low-cost sources of funding such as advances from the FED and a higher average volume of investments. Funds obtained through short-term borrowings were invested, in part, in the purchase of investment securities to mitigate the decline in the average yield on securities that resulted from the acceleration of MBS prepayments and calls of U.S. agency debentures (refer to the Financial and Operating Data

87


Analysis — Investment Activities discussion below for additional information about investment purchases, sales and calls in 2009). The decrease in the yield of investments was driven by the approximately $945 million of U.S. agency debentures called in 2009 and MBS prepayments. The variance observed in 2008, as compared to 2007, is mainly related to lower short-term rates and, to a lesser extent, to an increase in the volume of average interest-earning assets. The Corporation’s securities portfolio is mainly composed of fixed-rate U.S. agency MBS and debt securities tied to long-term rates. During 2008, the Corporation purchased approximately $3.2 billion in fixed-rate MBS at an average yield of 5.44%, which iswas significantly higher than the cost of borrowings used to finance the purchase of such assets. Despite the early redemption by counterparties of approximately $1.2 billion of U.S. agency debentures through call exercises, the lack of liquidity in the financial markets has caused several call dates go by in 2008 without counterpartiesissuers actions to exercise call provisions embedded in approximately $945 million of U.S. agency debentures still held by the Corporation as of December 31, 2008. The Corporation has benefited from higher than current market yields on these instruments. Also, non-cash gains from changes in the fair value of derivative instruments and SFAS 159 liabilities measured at fair value accounted for approximately $14.2 million of the increase in net interest income for 2008 as compared to 2007. The lower net interest loss for 2007 was caused by the effect in 2006 earnings of non-cash losses from changes in the fair value of derivative instruments prior to the implementation of the long-haul method of accounting on April 3,

79


2006. During the first quarter of 2006, the Corporation recorded unrealized losses of $69.7 million for derivatives as part of interest expense. The adoption of fair value hedge accounting in the second quarter of 2006 and the adoption of SFAS 159 in 2007 reduced the accounting volatility that previously resulted from the accounting asymmetry created by accounting for the financial liabilities at amortized cost and the derivatives at fair value.
  Non-interest income for the year ended December 31, 20082009 amounted to $25.8$84.4 million compared to aincome of $25.6 million and losses of $2.2 million and of $8.3 million for the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007, and 2006, respectively. The increase in 2009, as compared to 2008, was driven by a $59.6 million increase in realized gains on the sale of investment securities, primarily reflecting a $79.9 million gain on the sale of MBS (mainly U.S. agency fixed-rate MBS), compared to realized gains on the sale of MBS of $17.7 million in 2008. The positive fluctuation in earningsnon-interest income for 2008, as compared to 2007, was related to the aforementioneda realized gain of $17.7 million mainly on the sale of approximately $526 million of U.S. sponsored agency fixed-rate MBS and to the gain of $9.3 million on the sale of part of the Corporation’s investment in VISA in connection with VISA’s IPO. Refer to “Non-interest income”discussion above for additional information. The decrease in non-interest loss for 2007 was driven by lower other-than-temporary impairment charges in the Corporation’s equity securities portfolio, which decreased by $9.3 million as compared to 2006.
 
  Direct non-interest expenses for 20082009 were $6.7$7.4 million compared to $6.7 million and $7.8 million for 2008 and $7.72007, respectively. The fluctuations are mainly associated to professional service fees.
United States Operations
     The United States operations segment consists of all banking activities conducted by FirstBank in the United States mainland. The Corporation provides a wide range of banking services to individual and corporate customers in the state of Florida through its ten branches and two specialized lending centers. In the United States, the Corporation originally had an agency lending office in Miami, Florida. Then, it acquired Coral Gables-based Ponce General (the parent company of Unibank, a savings and loans bank in 2005) and changed the savings and loan’s name to FirstBank Florida. Those two entities were operated separately. In 2009, the Corporation filed an application with the Office of Thrift Supervision to surrender the Miami-based FirstBank Florida charter and merge its assets into FirstBank Puerto Rico, the main subsidiary of First BanCorp. The Corporation placed the entire Florida operation under the control of a new appointed Executive Vice President. The merger allows the Florida operations to benefit by leveraging the capital position of FirstBank Puerto Rico and thereby provide them with the support necessary to grow in the Florida market.
     The highlights of the United States operations segment financial results for the year ended December 31, 2009 include the following:
Segment loss before taxes for the year ended December 31, 2009 was $222.3 million compared to loss of $62.4 million and $12.1 million for the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively.
Net interest income for the year ended December 31, 2009 was $2.6 million compared to $28.8 million and 2006,$38.7 million for the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively. The decrease in net interest income for 2009 and 2008 was related to the surge in non-performing assets,

88


mainly construction loans, and a decrease in the volume of average earning-assets partially offset by a lower cost of funding due to the decline in market interest rates that benefit interest rates paid on short-term borrowings. In 2009, the Corporation implemented initiatives to accelerate deposit growth with special emphasis on increasing core deposits and shift away from brokered deposits. Also, the Corporation took actions to reduce its non-performing credits including the sales of certain troubled loans.
The provision for loan losses for 2009 was $188.7 million compared to $53.4 million and $30.2 million for 2008 and 2007, respectively. The increase in the provision for loan and lease losses for 2009 was mainly driven by the increase in non-performing loans and the decline in collateral values that has resulted in historical increases in charge-offs levels. Higher delinquency levels and loss trends were accounted for the loss factors used to determine the general reserve. Also, additional charges were necessary because of a higher volume of impaired loans that required specific reserves. Refer to the “Provision for Loan and Lease Losses” discussion above and to the “Risk Management — Allowance for Loan and Lease Losses and Non-performing Assets” discussion below for additional information with respect to the credit quality of the loan portfolio in the United States. The increase in the provision for loan and lease losses for 2008 was mainly driven by higher specific reserves relating to condo-conversion loans due to the deterioration of the real estate market and a slumping economy.
Total non-interest income for the year ended December 31, 2009 amounted to $1.5 million compared to a non-interest loss of $3.6 million and non-interest income of $1.2 million for the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively. The increase in non-interest income for 2009, as compared to 2008, was mainly attributable to a gain of $0.9 million on the sale of the entire portfolio of auto industry corporate bonds after having taking impairment charges of $4.2 million on those bonds in 2008. The decrease in non-interest income for 2008 was for the aforementioned impairment charge on corporate bonds and lower service charges on deposit accounts and loan fees.
Direct non-interest expenses for 2009 were $37.7 million compared to $34.2 million and $21.8 million for 2008 and 2007, respectively. The increase for 2009, as compared to 2008, was primarily due to the increase in the FDIC deposit insurance premium, and professional service fees. The increase for 2008, as compared to 2007, was mainly due to a higher loss in REO operations, primarily due to write-downs and expenses related to condo-conversion projects.
Virgin Islands Operations
     The Virgin Islands operations segment consists of all banking activities conducted by FirstBank in the U.S. and British Virgin Islands, including retail and commercial banking services as well as insurance activities. In 2002, after acquiring the Chase Manhattan Bank operations in the Virgin Islands, FirstBank became the largest bank in the Virgin Islands (USVI & BVI), serving St. Thomas, St. Croix, St. John, Tortola and Virgin Gorda, with 16 branches. In 2008, FirstBank acquired the Virgin Island Community Bank (“VICB”) in St. Croix, increasing its customer base and share in this market. The Virgin Islands operations segment is driven by its consumer and commercial lending and deposit-taking activities. Loans to consumers include auto, boat, lines of credit, personal loans and residential mortgage loans. Deposit products include interest bearing and non-interest bearing checking and savings accounts, Individual Retirement Accounts (IRA) and retail certificates of deposit. Retail deposits gathered through each branch serve as the funding sources for the lending activities.
     The highlights of the Virgin Islands operations segment financial results for the year ended December 31, 2009 include the following:
Segment income before taxes for the year ended December 31, 2009 was $0.8 million compared to $9.2 million and $26.3 million for the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively.
Net interest income for the year ended December 31, 2009 was $61.1 million compared to $60.0 million and $59.1 million for the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively. The

89


increase in net interest income was primarily due to the decrease in the cost of funding due to maturing CDs renewed at lower prevailing rates and reductions in rates paid on interest-bearing and savings accounts due to the decline in market interest rates. To a lesser, extent, the increase was also due to a higher volume of commercial loans primarily due to approximately $79.8 million in credit facilities extended to the U.S. Virgin Islands Government and political subdivisions in 2009. The increase for 2008, compared to 2007, was also driven by a lower cost of funding.
The provision for loan and lease losses for 2009 increased by $12.7 million compared to the same period in 2008 and increased by $10.0 million when comparing 2008 with the same period in 2007. The increase in the provision for 2009 was mainly related to the construction and residential and commercial mortgage loans portfolio affected by increases to general reserves to account for higher delinquency levels and a challenging economy. The increase in 2008, compared to 2007, was driven by increases to general reserves for the residential, commercial and commercial mortgage loans portfolio to account for negative trends in the economy. General economic conditions worsened, underscoring the severity of recessionary conditions in the US economy, critically important to the U.S. Virgin Islands as the primary market for visitors, trade and investment.
Non-interest income for the year ended December 31, 2009 was $10.2 million compared to $9.8 million and $12.2 million for the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively. The increase for 2009, as compared to 2008, was mainly related to higher service charges on deposit accounts and higher ATM interchange fee income. The decrease for 2008, as compared to 2007, was mainly associatedrelated to lower professionalthe impact in 2007 of a $2.8 million gain on the sale of a credit card portfolio. Aside from this transaction, non-interest income increased by $0.4 million primarily due to higher service fees.charges on deposits and higher credit and debit card interchange fee income.
Direct non-interest expenses for the year ended December 31, 2009 were $45.4 million compared to $48.1 million and $42.4 million for the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively. The decrease in direct operating expenses for 2009, as compared to 2008, was primarily due to a decrease in compensation expense, mainly due to headcount, overtime and bonuses reductions. The increase in direct operating expensesexpense for 2007,2008, compared to 20062007, was mainly due to increases in employees’ compensation, depreciation and benefits.professional service fees.

8090


FINANCIAL CONDITION AND OPERATING DATA ANALYSIS
Financial Condition
     The following table presents an average balance sheet of the Corporation for the following years:
                        
December 31, 2008 2007 2006  2009 2008 2007 
 (In thousands)  (In thousands) 
ASSETS
  
Interest-earning assets:  
Money market & other short-term investments $286,502 $440,598 $1,444,533  $182,205 $286,502 $440,598 
Government obligations 1,402,738 2,687,013 2,827,196  1,345,591 1,402,738 2,687,013 
Mortgage-backed securities 3,924,990 2,296,855 2,540,394  4,254,044 3,923,423 2,296,855 
Corporate bonds 6,144 7,711 8,347  4,769 7,711 7,711 
FHLB stock 65,081 46,291 26,914  76,982 65,081 46,291 
Equity securities 3,762 8,133 27,155  2,071 3,762 8,133 
              
Total investments 5,689,217 5,486,601 6,874,539  5,865,662 5,689,217 5,486,601 
              
  
Residential real estate loans 3,351,236 2,914,626 2,606,664 
Residential mortgage loans 3,523,576 3,351,236 2,914,626 
Construction loans 1,485,126 1,467,621 1,462,239  1,590,309 1,485,126 1,467,621 
Commercial loans 5,473,716 4,797,440 5,593,018  6,343,635 5,473,716 4,797,440 
Finance leases 373,999 379,510 322,431  341,943 373,999 379,510 
Consumer loans 1,709,512 1,729,548 1,783,384  1,661,099 1,709,512 1,729,548 
              
Total loans(1)
 12,393,589 11,288,745 11,767,736  13,460,562 12,393,589 11,288,745 
              
  
Total interest-earning assets 18,082,806 16,775,346 18,642,275  19,326,224 18,082,806 16,775,346 
  
Total non-interest-earning assets(2)(1)
 425,150 438,861 540,636  480,998 425,150 438,861 
              
Total assets $18,507,956 $17,214,207 $19,182,911  $19,807,222 $18,507,956 $17,214,207 
              
 
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
  
  
Interest-bearing liabilities:  
Interest-bearing checking accounts $580,572 $443,420 $371,422  $866,464 $580,572 $443,420 
Savings accounts 1,217,730 1,020,399 1,022,686  1,540,473 1,217,730 1,020,399 
Certificate of deposit 9,484,051 9,291,900 10,479,500 
Certificates of deposit 1,680,325 1,812,957 1,652,430 
Brokered CDs 7,300,696 7,671,094 7,639,470 
              
Interest-bearing deposits 11,282,353 10,755,719 11,873,608  11,387,958 11,282,353 10,755,719 
Loans payable(3)
 10,792   
Loans payable(2)
 643,618 10,792  
Other borrowed funds 3,864,189 3,449,492 4,543,262  3,745,980 3,864,189 3,449,492 
FHLB advances 1,120,782 723,596 273,395  1,322,136 1,120,782 723,596 
              
Total interest-bearing liabilities 16,278,116 14,928,807 16,690,265  17,099,692 16,278,116 14,928,807 
Total non-interest-bearing liabilities(4)
 796,476 959,361 1,294,563 
Total non-interest-bearing liabilities(3)
 852,943 796,476 959,361 
              
Total liabilities 17,074,592 15,888,168 17,984,828  17,952,635 17,074,592 15,888,168 
  
Stockholders’ equity:  
Preferred stock 550,100 550,100 550,100  909,274 550,100 550,100 
Common stockholders’ equity 883,264 775,939 647,983  945,313 883,264 775,939 
              
Stockholders’ equity 1,433,364 1,326,039 1,198,083  1,854,587 1,433,364 1,326,039 
              
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity $18,507,956 $17,214,207 $19,182,911  $19,807,222 $18,507,956 $17,214,207 
              
 
(1)Includes the average balance of non-accruing loans.
(2) Includes the allowance for loan and lease losses and the valuation on investment securities available-for-sale.
 
(3)(2) Consists of short-term borrowings under the FED Discount Window Program.
 
(4)(3) Includes changes in fair value onof liabilities elected to be measured at fair value under SFAS 159..

8191


     The Corporation’s total average assets were $18.5$19.8 billion and $17.2$18.5 billion as of December 31, 2009 and 2008, and 2007, respectively;respectively, an increase for 20082009 of $1.3 billion or 8%7% as compared to 2007.2008. The increase in average assets was due to :to: (i) an increase of $1.1 billion in average loans driven by new originations, in particular credit facilities extended to the Puerto Rico Government and its political subdivisions, and (ii) an increase of $176.4 million in investment securities mainly due to the purchase of approximately $2.8 billion in investment securities in 2009 (mainly U.S. agency callable debt securities and U.S. agency MBS) and the securitization of approximately $305 million FHA/VA loans into GNMA MBS, partially offset by $1.9 billion in investment securities sold during the year (mainly U.S. agency MBS, including $452 million in the last month of the year) and $955 million debt securities called during the year (mainly U.S. agency debentures). The increase in average assets for 2008, as compared to 2007, was also driven by an increase of $1.1 billion in average loans due to loan originations, mainly commercial and residential mortgage loans, and (ii) an increase of $202.6 million in investment securities, mainly due to the purchasepurchases of approximately $3.2 billion in MBS during 2008, partially offset by $1.2 billion U.S. agency debentures called during the year.MBS.
     The decrease inCorporation’s total average assets for 2007,liabilities were $18.0 billion and $17.1 billion as of December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively, an increase of $878.0 million or 5% as compared to 2006, was due to deleveraging2008. The Corporation has diversified its sources of the balance sheet. In particular, the Corporation made useborrowings including: (i) an increase of short-term money market investments to pay down brokered certificates deposits and repurchase agreements as they matured and sold lower yielding U.S. Treasury and mortgage-backed securities. The$834.2 million in the average balance of advances from the commercial loan portfolio decreased by $795.6 million due to the repayment of $2.4 billion received from a local financial institution in May 2006FED and the partial extinguishmentFHLB, as the Corporation used low-cost sources of $50funding to match an investment portfolio with a shorter maturity, and (ii) an increase of $105.6 million and the recharacterization of approximately $183.8 million of secured commercial loans extended to R&G Financial in February 2007.
average interest-bearing deposits, reflecting increases in core deposits, mainly in money market accounts in Florida. The Corporation’s total average liabilities were $17.1 billion and $15.9 billion as of December 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively, an increase of $1.2 billion or 7% as compared to 2007. The Corporation has diversified its sources of borrowings including: (i) an increase of $526.6 million in average interest-bearing deposits, reflecting increases in brokered CDs used to finance lending activities and to increase liquidity levels as a precautionary measure given the currentvolatile economic climate, and increases in deposits from individual, commercial and government sectors, (ii) an increase of $414.7 million in alternative sources such as repurchase agreements that financed the increase in investment securities, and (iii) a combined increase of approximately $408.0 million in advances from FHLB and short-term borrowings from the FED through the Discount Window Program as the Corporation has takentook direct actions to enhance its liquidity position due to the financial market disruptions and increasedto increase its borrowing capacity with the FHLB and the FED, which funds are also used to finance the Corporation’s lending activities. The decrease in average liabilities for 2007, as compared to 2006, was driven by a lower average balance of brokered CDs and repurchase agreements due to the deleveraging of the Corporation’s balance sheet. In addition, the redemption of the Corporation’s $150 million medium-term notes during the second quarter of 2007, which carried a cost higher than the overall cost of funding, contributed to the decrease in average liabilities in 2007. These reductions were partially offset by a higher average volume of advances from FHLB.
Assets
Total assets as of December 31, 20082009 amounted to $19.5$19.6 billion, an increase of $2.3 billion$137.2 million compared to total assets$19.5 billion as of December 31, 2007.2008. The Corporation’s loan portfolio increased by $1.3 billion$860.9 million (before the allowance for loan and lease losses), driven by new originations, mainly commercialcredit facilities extended to the Puerto Rico Government and/or its political subdivisions. Also, an increase of $298.4 million in cash and residential mortgage loans and the purchase of a $218 million auto loan portfolio during the third quarter of 2008. Also,cash equivalents contributed to the increase in total assets, is attributable toas the purchase of approximately $3.2 billion of fixed-rate U.S. government agency MBS during the first half of 2008 as market conditions presented an opportunity to obtain attractive yields, improveCorporation improved its net interest margin and replace $1.2 billion of U.S. Agency debentures called by counterparties. The Corporation increased its cash and money market investments by $26.8 million in partliquidity position as a precautionary measure given current volatile market conditions. Partially offsetting the increase in loans and liquid assets was a $790.8 million decrease in investment securities, driven by sales and principal repayments of MBS as well as U.S. agency debt securities called during the present economic climate.2009.

8292


Loans Receivable
     The following table presents the composition of the loan portfolio including loans held for sale as of year-end for each of the last five years.
                                        
(In thousands) 2008 2007 2006 2005 2004  2009 2008 2007 2006 2005 
Residential real estate loans, including loans held for sale $3,491,728 $3,164,421 $2,772,630 $2,346,945 $1,322,650 
Residential mortgage loans, including loans held for sale $3,616,283 $3,491,728 $3,164,421 $2,772,630 $2,346,945 
           
            
Commercial loans:  
Commercial real estate loans 1,535,758 1,279,251 1,215,040 1,090,193 690,900 
Commercial mortgage loans 1,590,821 1,535,758 1,279,251 1,215,040 1,090,193 
Construction loans 1,526,995 1,454,644 1,511,608 1,137,118 398,453  1,492,589 1,526,995 1,454,644 1,511,608 1,137,118 
Commercial loans 3,857,728 3,231,126 2,698,141 2,421,219 1,871,851 
Commercial and Industrial loans 5,029,907 3,857,728 3,231,126 2,698,141 2,421,219 
Loans to local financial institutions collateralized by real estate mortgages and pass-through trust certificates 567,720 624,597 932,013 3,676,314 3,841,908  321,522 567,720 624,597 932,013 3,676,314 
                      
Total commercial loans 7,488,201 6,589,618 6,356,802 8,324,844 6,803,112  8,434,839 7,488,201 6,589,618 6,356,802 8,324,844 
                      
  
Finance leases 363,883 378,556 361,631 280,571 212,234  318,504 363,883 378,556 361,631 280,571 
  
Consumer loans 1,744,480 1,667,151 1,772,917 1,733,569 1,359,998 
Consumer loans and other loans 1,579,600 1,744,480 1,667,151 1,772,917 1,733,569 
            
            
Total loans, gross 13,088,292 11,799,746 11,263,980 12,685,929 9,697,994  13,949,226 13,088,292 11,799,746 11,263,980 12,685,929 
                      
  
Less:  
Allowance for loan and lease losses  (281,526)  (190,168)  (158,296)  (147,999)  (141,036)  (528,120)  (281,526)  (190,168)  (158,296)  (147,999)
                      
 
Total loans, net $12,806,766 $11,609,578 $11,105,684 $12,537,930 $9,556,958  $13,421,106 $12,806,766 $11,609,578 $11,105,684 $12,537,930 
                      
Lending Activities
     GrossAs of December 31, 2009, the Corporation’s total loans increased by $1.3 billion in 2008, or 11%,$860.9 million, when compared to 2007 primarily due to anwith the balance as of December 31, 2008. The increase in the Corporation’s commercial and residential mortgage loan portfoliostotal loans primarily relates to increases in C&I loans driven by new originations.internal loan originations, mainly to the Puerto Rico Government as further discussed below, partially offset by repayments and charge-offs of approximately $333.3 million recorded in 2009, mainly for construction loans in Florida.
     As shown in the table above, the 20082009 loan portfolio was comprised of commercial (57%(60%), residential real estate (27%(26%), and consumer and finance leases (16%(14%). Of the total gross loansloan portfolio of $13.1$13.9 billion for 2008,as of December 31, 2009, approximately 81%83% have credit risk concentration in Puerto Rico, 11%9% in the United States and 8% in the Virgin Islands, as shown in the following table.
                                
 Puerto Virgin United    Puerto Virgin United   
As of December 31, 2008 Rico Islands States Total 
As of December 31, 2009 Rico Islands States Total 
 (In thousands)  (In thousands) 
Residential real estate loans, including loans held for sale $2,637,210 $447,216 $407,302 $3,491,728  $2,790,829 $450,649 $374,805 $3,616,283 
                  
  
Commercial real estate loans 977,700 78,511 479,547 1,535,758 
Commercial mortgage loans 983,125 73,114 534,582 1,590,821 
Construction loans (1) 834,817 175,405 516,773 1,526,995  998,235 194,813 299,541 1,492,589 
Commercial loans 3,648,823 172,356 36,549 3,857,728 
Loans to local financial institutions collateralized by real estate mortgages 567,720   567,720 
Commercial and Industrial loans 4,756,297 241,497 32,113 5,029,907 
Loans to a local financial institution collateralized by real estate mortgages 321,522   321,522 
                  
Total commercial loans 6,029,060 426,272 1,032,869 7,488,201  7,059,179 509,424 866,236 8,434,839 
 
Finance leases 363,883   363,883  318,504   318,504 
 
Consumer loans 1,571,335 129,305 43,840 1,744,480  1,446,354 98,418 34,828 1,579,600 
                  
 
Total loans, gross $10,601,488 $1,002,793 $1,484,011 $13,088,292  $11,614,866 $1,058,491 $1,275,869 $13,949,226 
 
Allowance for loan and lease losses  (203,233)  (9,712)  (68,581)  (281,526)  (410,714)  (27,502)  (89,904)  (528,120)
                  
 $10,398,255 $993,081 $1,415,430 $12,806,766  $11,204,152 $1,030,989 $1,185,965 $13,421,106 
                  
 
(1) Construction loan portfolio in the United States includesloans of Florida operations include approximately $197.4$70.4 million of loans originally disbursed as condo-conversion loans, net of which $154.4 million is considered impaired ascharge-offs of December 31, 2008 with a specific reserve of $36.0$32.4 million.

8393


     First BanCorp relies primarily on its retail network of branches to originate residential and consumer loans. The Corporation supplements its residential mortgage originations with wholesale servicing released mortgage loan purchases from small mortgage bankers. The Corporation manages its construction and commercial loan originations through centralized units and most of its originations come from existing customers as well as through referrals and direct solicitations. For purposespurpose of the following presentation, the Corporation separately presented separatelysecured commercial loans to local financial institutions because it believes this approach provides a better representation of the Corporation’s commercial production capacity.
     The following table sets forth certain additional data (including loan production) related to the Corporation’s loan portfolio net of the allowance for loan and lease losses for the dates indicated:
                                        
 For the Year Ended December 31,  For the Year Ended December 31, 
 2008 2007 2006 2005 2004  2009 2008 2007 2006 2005 
 (In thousands)  (In thousands) 
Beginning balance $11,609,578 $11,105,684 $12,537,930 $9,556,958 $6,914,677  $12,806,766 $11,609,578 $11,105,684 $12,537,930 $9,556,958 
Residential real estate loans originated and purchased 690,365 715,203 908,846 1,372,490 765,486  591,889 690,365 715,203 908,846 1,372,490 
Construction loans originated and purchased 475,834 678,004 961,746 1,061,773 309,053  433,493 475,834 678,004 961,746 1,061,773 
Commercial loans originated and purchased 2,175,395 1,898,157 2,031,629 2,258,558 1,014,946 
C&I and Commercial mortgage loans originated and purchased 3,153,278 2,175,395 1,898,157 2,031,629 2,258,558 
Secured commercial loans disbursed to local financial institutions    681,407 2,228,056      681,407 
Finance leases originated 110,596 139,599 177,390 145,808 116,200  80,716 110,596 139,599 177,390 145,808 
Consumer loans originated and purchased 788,215 653,180 807,979 992,942 746,113  514,774 788,215 653,180 807,979 992,942 
                      
Total loans originated and purchased 4,240,405 4,084,143 4,887,590 6,512,978 5,179,854  4,774,150 4,240,405 4,084,143 4,887,590 6,512,978 
 
Sales and securitizations of loans  (164,583)  (147,044)  (167,381)  (118,527)  (180,818)  (464,705)  (164,583)  (147,044)  (167,381)  (118,527)
Repayments and prepayments  (2,589,120)  (3,084,530)  (6,022,633)  (3,803,804)  (2,263,043)  (3,010,857)  (2,589,120)  (3,084,530)  (6,022,633)  (3,803,804)
 
Other (decreases) increases(1) (2)
  (289,514)  (348,675)  (129,822) 390,325  (93,712)  (684,248)  (289,514)  (348,675)  (129,822) 390,325 
                      
Net increase (decrease) 1,197,188 503,894  (1,432,246) 2,980,972 2,642,281  614,340 1,197,188 503,894  (1,432,246) 2,980,972 
                      
  
Ending balance $12,806,766 $11,609,578 $11,105,684 $12,537,930 $9,556,958  $13,421,106 $12,806,766 $11,609,578 $11,105,684 $12,537,930 
                      
Percentage increase (decrease)  10.31%  4.54%  (11.42)%  31.19%  38.21%  4.80%  10.31%  4.54%  (11.42)%  31.19%
 
(1) Includes the change in the allowance for loan and lease losses and cancellation of loans due to the repossession of the collateral.
 
(2) For 2008, is net of $19.6 million of loans from the acquisition of VICB in 2008.VICB. For 2007, includes the recharacterization of securities collateralized by loans of approximately $183.8 million previously accounted for as a secured commercial loan with R&G Financial. For 2005, includes $470 million of loans acquired as part of the Ponce General acquisition.
Residential Real Estate Loans
     As of December 31, 2009, the Corporation’s residential real estate loan portfolio increased by $124.6 million as compared to the balance as of December 31, 2008. More than 90% of the Corporation’s outstanding balance of residential mortgage loans consists of fixed-rate, fully amortizing, full documentation loans. In accordance with the Corporation’s underwriting guidelines, residential real estate loans are mostly full documented loans, and the Corporation is not actively involved in the origination of negative amortization loans or adjustable-rate mortgage loans. The increase was driven by a portfolio acquired during the second quarter of 2009 from R&G, a Puerto Rican financial institution, and new loan originations during 2009. The R&G transaction involved the purchase of approximately $205 million of residential mortgage loans that previously served as collateral for a commercial loan extended to R&G. The purchase price of the transaction was retained by the Corporation to fully pay off the commercial loan, thereby significantly reducing the Corporation’s exposure to a single borrower. This acquisition had the effect of improving the Corporation’s regulatory capital ratios due to the lower risk-weighting of the assets acquired. Additionally, net interest income improved since the weighted-average effective yield on the mortgage loans acquired approximated 5.38% (including non-performing loans) compared to a yield of approximately 150 basis points over 3-month LIBOR in the commercial loan to R&G. Partially offsetting the increase driven by the aforementioned transaction and loan originations was the securitization of approximately $305 million of FHA/VA mortgage loans into GNMA MBS. Refer to the “Contractual Obligations and Commitments” discussion below for additional information about outstanding commitments to sell mortgage loans.

94


Residential real estate loan production and purchases for the year ended December 31, 20082009 decreased by $24.8$98.5 million, compared to the same period in 20072008 and decreased by $193.6$24.8 million for 2007,2008, compared to the same period in 2006.2007. The decrease in 2009 was primarily due to weak economic conditions reflected in a continued trend of higher unemployment rates affecting consumers. Nevertheless, the Corporation’s residential mortgage loan originations, including purchases of $218.4 million, amounted to $591.9 million in 2009. This excludes the aforementioned purchase of approximately $205 million of loans that previously served as collateral for a commercial loan extended to R&G, since the Corporation believes this approach provides a better representation of the Corporation’s residential mortgage loan production capacity.
     Residential real estate loans represent 12% of total loans originated and purchased for 2009. The Corporation’s strategy is to penetrate markets by providing customers with a variety of high quality mortgage products. The Corporation’s residential mortgage loan originations continued to be driven by FirstMortgage, its mortgage loan origination subsidiary. FirstMortgage supplements its internal direct originations through its retail network with an indirect business strategy. The Corporation’s Partners in Business, a division of FirstMortgage, partners with mortgage brokers and small mortgage bankers in Puerto Rico to purchase ongoing mortgage loan production.
     The slight decrease in mortgage loan production for 2008, as compared to 2007, reflects athe lower volume of loans purchased during 2008. Residential mortgage loan purchases during 2008 amounted to $211.8 million, a decrease of approximately $58.7 million from 2007. This iswas due to the impact in 2007 of a purchase of $72.2 million (mainly FHA loans) from a local financial institution not as part of the ongoing Corporation’s Partners in Business Program discussed below.above. Meanwhile, internal residential mortgage loan originations increased by $33.9 million for 2008, as compared to 2007, favorably affected by legislation approved by the Puerto Rico Government (Act 197) which providesprovided credits to lenders and borrowers when individuals purchasepurchased certain new or existing homes.
     The credits for lenders and borrowers were as follows: (a) for a new constructed home that willwould constitute the individual’s principal residence, a credit equal to 20% of the sales price or $25,000, whichever iswas lower; (b) for new constructed homes that willwould not constitute the individual’s principal residence, a credit of 10% of the sales price or $15,000, whichever iswas lower; and (c) for existing homes, a credit of 10% of the sales price or $10,000, whichever iswas lower.
     From the homebuyer’s perspective: (1) the individual maycould not benefit from the credit no more than twice; (2) the amount of credit granted will bewas credited against the principal amount of the mortgage; (3) the individual musthad to acquire the property before December 31, 2008; and (4) for new constructed homes constituting the principal residence and existing homes, the individual musthad to live in it as his or her principal residence for at least three

84


consecutive years. Noncompliance with this requirement will affect only the homebuyer’s credit and not the tax credit granted to the financial institution.
     From the financial institution’s perspective: (1) the credit may be used against income taxes, including estimated taxes, for years commencing after December 31, 2007 in three installments, subject to certain limitations, between January 1, 2008 and June 30, 2011; (2) the credit may be ceded, sold or otherwise transferred to any other person; and (3) any tax credit not used in a given tax year, as certified by the Secretary of Treasury, may be claimed as a refund.
     Loan originations of the Corporation covered by Act 197 amounted to approximately $90.0 million for 2008.
     Residential real estate loans represent 16% of total loans originated and purchased for 2008, with the residential mortgage loans balance increasing by $327.3 million, from $3.2 billion in 2007 to $3.5 billion in 2008. The Corporation’s strategy is to penetrate markets by providing customers with a variety of high quality mortgage products. The Corporation’s residential mortgage loan originations continued to be driven by FirstMortgage, its mortgage loan origination subsidiary. FirstMortgage supplements its internal direct originations through its retail network with an indirect business strategy. The Corporation’s Partners in Business, a division of FirstMortgage, partners with mortgage brokers and small mortgage bankers in Puerto Rico to purchase ongoing mortgage loan production. FirstMortgage’s multi-channel strategy has proven to be effective in capturing business.
     The decrease in mortgage loan production for 2007, as compared to 2006, was attributable to deteriorating economic conditions in Puerto Rico, the slowdown in the United States housing market and stricter underwriting standards. The Corporation decided to make certain adjustments to its underwriting standards designed to enhance the credit quality of its mortgage loan portfolio, in light of worsening macroeconomic conditions in Puerto Rico.
     The Corporation has not been active in subprime or adjustable rate mortgage loans (“ARMs”), nor has it been exposed to collateral debt obligations or other types of exotic products that aggravated the current global financial crisis. More than 90% of the Corporation’s outstanding balance in its residential mortgage loan portfolio consists of fixed-rate, fully amortizing, full documentation loans.
Commercial and Construction Loans
     In recent years,As of December 31, 2009, the Corporation has emphasizedCorporation’s commercial lending activities and continuesconstruction loan portfolio increased by $946.6 million, as compared to penetrate this market.the balance as of December 31, 2008, due mainly to loan originations to the Puerto Rico Government as discussed below, partially offset by the aforementioned unwinding of the commercial loan with R&G, principal repayments and net charge-offs in 2009. A substantial portion of this portfolio is collateralized by real estate. The Corporation’s commercial loans are primarily variable and adjustable-rate loans.

95


Total commercial and construction loans originated amounted to $2.7$3.6 billion for 2008,2009, an increase of $75.1$935.5 million when compared to originations during 2007,2008. The increase in commercial and construction loan production for total2009, compared to 2008, was mainly driven by approximately $1.7 billion in credit facilities extended to the Puerto Rico Government and/or its political subdivisions. The increase in loan originations related to governmental agencies was partially offset by a $118.9 million decrease in commercial mortgage loan portfoliooriginations and a decrease of $7.5 billion at December 31, 2008. As a result of new originations net of prepayments$179.6 million in floor plan originations. Floor plan lending activities depends on inventory levels (autos) financed and maturities, the commercial loans balance, excluding secured commercial loans to local financial institutions, increased by $0.9 billion, from $6.0 billion as of December 31, 2007 to $6.9 billion as of December 31, 2008.their turnover.
     The increase in commercial and construction loan production for 2008, compared to 2007, was mainly experienced in Puerto Rico. Commercial loan originations in Puerto Rico increased by approximately $269.8 million for 2008. Commercial originations include floor plan lending activities which depends on inventory levels (autos) financed and their turnover. Floor plan originations amounted to approximately $729.5 million for the 2008 year, compared to $729.3 million for 2007. The increase in commercial loan originations in Puerto Rico was partially offset by lower construction loan originations in the United States, which decreased by $144.7 million for 2008, as compared to 2007, due to the slowdown in the U.S. housing marketmarket.
     As of December 31, 2009, the Corporation had $1.2 billion outstanding of credit facilities granted to the Puerto Rico Government and/or its political subdivisions. A substantial portion of these credit facilities are obligations that have a specific source of income or revenues identified for their repayment, such as sales and the strategic decisionproperty taxes collected by the central Government and/or municipalities. Another portion of these obligations consists of loans to public corporations that obtain revenues from rates charged for services or products, such as electric power utilities. Public corporations have varying degrees of independence from the central Government and many receive appropriations or other payments from it. The Corporation also has loans to reduce its exposure to condo-conversion loans in its Miami Corporate Banking operations. Also, there was a decrease in construction loan originationsvarious municipalities in Puerto Rico duefor which the good faith, credit and unlimited taxing power of the applicable municipality have been pledged to current weakening economic conditions.their repayment.
     Aside from loans extended to the Puerto Rico Government and its political subdivisions, the largest loan to one borrower as of December 31, 2009 in the amount of $321.5 million is with one mortgage originator in Puerto Rico, Doral Financial Corporation. This commercial loan is secured by individual mortgage loans on residential and commercial real estate.
     Although commercial loans involve greater credit risk because they are larger in size and more risk is concentrated in a single borrower, the Corporation has and continues to develop an effectivea credit risk management infrastructure that mitigates potential losses associated with commercial lending, including strong underwriting and loan review functions, sales of loan participations, and continuous monitoring of concentrations within portfolios.

85


     The Corporation’s commercialConstruction loans are primarily variable and adjustable rate loans. Commercial loan originations come from existing customers as well as through referrals and direct solicitations. Thedecreased by $42.3 million due to the strategic decision by the Corporation follows a strategy aimed to caterreduce its exposure to customer needsconstruction projects in the commercial loans middle-market segment by building strong relationships and offering financial solutions that meet customers’ unique needs. The Corporation has expanded its distribution network and participation in the commercial loans middle-market segment by focusing on customers with financing needs in amounts of up to $5 million. The Corporation has 5 regional offices that provide coverage throughout Puerto Rico. The offices are staffed with sales, marketing and credit officers able to provide a high level of personalized service and prompt decision-making.
     The Corporation’s largest concentration as of December 31, 2008 in the amount of $348.8 million is with one mortgage originator inboth Puerto Rico Doral. Together withand the Corporation’s next largest loan concentration of $218.9 million with another mortgage originator in Puerto Rico, R&G Financial, the Corporation’s total loans granted to these mortgage originators amounted to $567.7 million as of December 31, 2008. These commercial loans are secured by individual mortgage loans on residential and commercial real estate. In December 2005, the Corporation obtained a waiver from the Office of the Commissioner of Financial Institutions of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico with respect to the statutory limit for individual borrowers (loan-to-one borrower limit). However, as of December 31, 2008, the outstanding balance of the R&G Financial relationship was under the loan-to-one borrower limit for secured loans of approximately $331 million.
United States. The Corporation’s construction lending volume has decreasedbeen stagnant for the last year due to the slowdown in the U.S. housing market and the current economic environment in Puerto Rico. The Corporation has reduced its exposure to condo-conversion loans in its Miami Corporate BankingFlorida operations and is closely evaluating market conditions and opportunitiesconstruction loan originations in Puerto Rico.Rico are mainly draws from existing commitments. More than 70% of the construction loan originations in 2009 are related to disbursements from previous established commitments. Current absorption rates in condo-conversion loans in the United States are low and properties collateralizing some of these condo-conversion loans have been formally reverted to rental properties with a future plan for the sale of converted units upon an improvement in the United States real estate market. As of December 31, 2008,2009, approximately $47.8$60.1 million of loans originally disbursed as condo-conversion construction loans have been formally reverted to income-producing commercial loans.loans, while the repayment of interest on the remaining construction condo-conversion loans is coming principally from rental income and other sources. Given more conservative underwriting standards of the banks in general and a reduction ofin market participants in the lending business, the Corporation believes that the rental market in Florida will growgrow. As part of the Corporation’s initiative to reduce its exposure to construction projects in Florida, during 2009, the Corporation completed the sales of four non-performing construction loans in Florida totaling approximately $40.4 million. Refer to the discussion under “Risk Management — Credit Risk Management — Allowance for Loan and rental properties will hold their values.Lease Losses and Non-performing Assets” below for additional information.

8696


     The composition of the Corporation’s construction loan portfolio as of December 31, 20082009 by category and geographic location follows:
                                
 Puerto Virgin United    Puerto Virgin United   
As of December 31, 2008 Rico Islands States Total 
As of December 31, 2009 Rico Islands States Total 
 (In thousands)  (In thousands) 
Loans for residential housing projects:  
High-rise(1)
 $183,910 $ $559 $184,469  $202,800 $ $559 $203,359 
Mid-rise(2)
 108,143 5,977 56,235 170,355  100,433 4,471 28,125 133,029 
Single-family detach 108,294 2,675 40,844 151,813  123,807 4,166 31,186 159,159 
                  
Total for residential housing projects 400,347 8,652 97,638 506,637  427,040 8,637 59,870 495,547 
                  
Construction loans to individuals secured by residential properties 15,442 37,729  53,171  11,716 26,636  38,352 
Condo-conversion loans(3)
   197,384 197,384  10,082  70,435 80,517 
Loans for commercial projects 215,456 92,032 18,806 326,294  324,711 117,333 1,535 443,579 
Bridge and Land loans 176,088 37,846 203,162 417,096 
Bridge loans — residential 56,095  1,285 57,380 
Bridge loans — commercial 3,003 20,261 72,178 95,442 
Land loans — residential 77,820 20,690 66,802 165,312 
Land loans — commercial 61,868 1,105 27,519 90,492 
Working capital 31,213   31,213  29,727 1,015  30,742 
                  
Total before net deferred fees and allowance for loan losses 838,546 176,259 516,990 1,531,795  1,002,062 195,677 299,624 1,497,363 
Net deferred fees  (3,729)  (854)  (217)  (4,800)  (3,827)  (865)  (82)  (4,774)
                  
Total construction loan portfolio, gross 834,817 175,405 516,773 1,526,995  998,235 194,812 299,542 1,492,589 
Allowance for loan losses  (28,310)  (1,494)  (53,678)  (83,482)  (100,007)  (16,380)  (47,741)  (164,128)
                  
Total construction loan portfolio, net $806,507 $173,911 $463,095 $1,443,513  $898,228 $178,432 $251,801 $1,328,461 
                  
 
(1) For purposes of the above table, high-rise portfolio is composed of buildings with more than 7 stories, mainly composed of two projects that represent approximately 74%71% of the Corporation’s total outstanding high-rise residential construction loan portfolio in Puerto Rico.
 
(2) Mid-rise relates to buildings up to 7 stories.
(3)During 2008, approximately $47.8 million of loans originally disbursed as condo-conversion construction loans have been formally reverted to income-producing loans and included as part of the commercial real estate portfolio.
     The following table presents further information on the Corporation’s construction portfolio as of and for the year ended December 31, 2008:2009:
        
(Dollars in thousands)     
Total undisbursed funds under existing commitments $514,018  $249,961 
      
  
Construction loans in non-accrual status $116,290  $634,329 
      
  
Net charge offs — Construction loans (1) $7,735  $183,600 
      
  
Allowance for loan losses — Construction loans $83,482  $164,128 
      
  
Non-performing construction loans to total construction loans  7.62%  42.50%
      
  
Allowance for loan losses — construction loans to total construction loans  5.47%  11.00%
      
  
Net charge-offs to total average construction loans (1)  0.52%  11.54%
      
 
(1) Includes charge-offs of $6.2$137.4 million related to the repossession and sale of impairedconstruction loans in the Miami Corporate Banking operations.Florida and $46.2 million related to construction loans in Puerto Rico.

97


     The following summarizes the construction loans for residential housing projects in Puerto Rico segregated by the estimated selling price of the units:
        
(In thousands)     
Under $300K $88,404  $142,280 
$300K-$600K 171,118  87,306 
Over $600K(1) 140,825  197,454 
      
 $400,347  $427,040 
      
(1)Mainly composed of three high-rise projects and one single-family detached project that accounts for approximately 67% and 14%, respectively, of the residential housing projects in Puerto Rico.
      For the majority of the construction loans for residential housing projects in Florida, the estimated selling price of the units is under $300,000.
     Consumer Loans and Finance Leases
     As of December 31, 2009, the Corporation’s consumer loan and finance leases portfolio decreased by $210.3 million, as compared to the portfolio balance as of December 31, 2008. This is mainly the result of repayments and charge-offs that on a combined basis more than offset the volume of loan originations during 2009. Nevertheless, the Corporation experienced a decrease in net charge-offs for consumer loans and finance leases that amounted to $61.1 million for 2009, as compared to $66.4 million for the same period a year ago. The decrease in net charge offs as compared to 2008 is attributable to the relative stability in the credit quality of this portfolio and changes in underwriting standards implemented in late 2005. New originations under these revised standards have an average life of approximately four years.
     Consumer loan originations are principally driven through the Corporation’s retail network. For the year ended December 31, 2008,2009, consumer loan and finance lease originations amounted to $788.2$595.5 million, ana decrease of $303.3 million or 34% compared to 2008 adversely impacted by economic conditions in Puerto Rico and the United States. The increase of $135.0$106.0 million or 21% compared to 2007. The increase in consumer loan and finance leases originations in 2008, as compared to 2007, was related to the purchase of a $218 million auto loan portfolio from Chrysler Financial Services Caribbean, LLC (“Chrysler”) in July 2008. Aside from this transaction, the consumer loan production decreased by approximately $83$112 million, or 13%14%, for 2008 as compared to

87


2007 mainly due to adverse economic conditions in Puerto Rico. Unemployment in Puerto Rico reached 13.1%13.7% in December 2008, up 2.6%2.7% from the prior year.year, and in 2009 tops 15%. Consumer loan originations are driven by auto loan originations through a strategy of providingseeking to provide outstanding service to selected auto dealers who provide the channel for the bulk of the Corporation’s auto loan originations. This strategy is directly linked to our commercial lending activities as the Corporation maintains strong and stable auto floor plan relationships, which are the foundation of a successful auto loan generation operation. The CorporationCorporation’s commercial relations with floor plan dealers is strong and directly benefits the Corporation’s consumer lending operation.
Finance Leases
     Originations of finance leases which are mostly composed of loans to individuals to finance the acquisition of a motor vehicle decreased by $29.0 million or 21% to $110.6 million during 2008 compared to 2007, also affected by adverse economic conditions in Puerto Rico. These leasesand typically have five-year terms and are collateralized by a security interest in the underlying assets.
Investment Activities
     As part of its strategy to diversify its revenue sources and maximize its net interest income, First BanCorp maintains an investment portfolio that is classified as available-for-sale or held-to-maturity. The Corporation’s investment portfolio as of December 31, 20082009 amounted to $5.7$4.9 billion, an increasea reduction of $897.7$842.5 million when compared with the investment portfolio of $4.8$5.7 billion as of December 31, 2007.2008. The increasereduction in the investment securities resulted mainly fromportfolio was the previously discussed purchasenet result of approximately $3.2$1.9 billion in sales of securities, $955 million in calls of U.S. government-sponsored agency fixed-rate MBS duringnotes and certain obligations of the first half of 2008 as market conditions presented an opportunity for the Corporation to obtain attractive yields, improve its net interest marginPuerto Rico Government, and mitigate the impact of $1.2 billion U.S. Agency debentures called by counterparties. The Corporation also sold approximately $526$959 million of MBS in 2008 given a surge in prices, in particular after the announcementmortgage-backed securities prepayments; partly offset with securities purchases of the FED that it will invest up to $600 billion in obligations from U.S. government-sponsored agencies, including $500$2.9 billion.
     Sales of investments securities during 2009 were approximately $1.7 billion in MBS backed by FNMA, FHLMC(mainly 30 Year U.S. agency MBS), with a weighted-average yield of 5.49%, $96 million of US Treasury notes with a weighted average yield of 3.54% and GNMA.$100 million of Puerto Rico government obligations with an average yield of 5.50%.
     Total purchasesPurchases of investment securities excluding those invested on a short-term basis (money market investments) during 2008 amounted2009 mainly consisted of U.S. agency callable debentures having contractual maturities ranging from two to approximately $3.4three years (approximately $1.0 billion and were composed mainly of mortgage-backed securities in the amount of $3.2 billion withat a weighted-average couponyield of 5.44%

98


2.13%), 7-10 Year U.S. Treasury bills with original maturities over 3 months in the amount of $161.1Notes (approximately $96 million withat a weighted-average couponyield of 1.09% ($152.7 million already expired as3.54%) subsequently sold, 15-Year U.S. agency MBS (approximately $1.3 billion at a weighted-average yield of December 31, 2008)3.85%) and floating collateralized mortgage obligations fromissued by GNMA, FNMA and FHLMC (approximately $184 million). Also, during 2009, the Puerto Rico governmentCorporation began and completed the securitization of approximately $114.3$305 million with a weighted-average coupon of 5.47%.FHA/VA mortgage loans into GNMA MBS.
     Over 90%94% of the Corporation’s available-for-sale and held-to-maturity securities portfolio is invested in U.S. Government and Agency debentures and fixed-rate U.S. government sponsored-agency MBS (mainly FNMA and FHLMC fixed-rate securities). As of December 31, 2008, the Corporation had $4.0 billion and $925 million in FNMA and FHLMC mortgage-backed securities and debt securities, respectively, representing 87% of the total investment portfolio. The Corporation’s investment in equity securities is minimal, and it does not own any equity or debt securities of U.S. financial institutions that recently failed.minimal.

88


     The following table presents the carrying value of investments as of December 31, 20082009 and 2007:2008:
        
 2008 2007         
(In thousands) (In thousands)  2009 2008 
Money market investments $76,003 $183,136  $24,286 $76,003 
          
  
Investment securities held-to-maturity: 
Investment securities held-to-maturity, at amortized cost: 
U.S. Government and agencies obligations 953,516 2,365,147  8,480 953,516 
Puerto Rico Government obligations 23,069 31,222  23,579 23,069 
Mortgage-backed securities 728,079 878,714  567,560 728,079 
Corporate bonds 2,000 2,000  2,000 2,000 
          
 1,706,664 3,277,083  601,619 1,706,664 
          
  
Investment securities available-for-sale: 
Investment securities available-for-sale, at fair value: 
U.S. Government and agencies obligations  16,032  1,145,139  
Puerto Rico Government obligations 137,133 24,521  136,326 137,133 
Mortgage-backed securities 3,722,992 1,239,169  2,889,014 3,722,992 
Corporate bonds 1,548 4,448   1,548 
Equity securities 669 2,116  303 669 
          
 3,862,342 1,286,286  4,170,782 3,862,342 
          
  
Other equity securities, including $62.6 million and $63.4 million of FHLB stock as of December 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively 64,145 64,908 
Other equity securities, including $68.4 million and $62.6 million of FHLB stock as of December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively 69,930 64,145 
          
Total investments $5,709,154 $4,811,413  $4,866,617 $5,709,154 
          
     Mortgage-backed securities as of December 31, 20082009 and 2007,2008, consist of:
                
(In thousands) 2008 2007  2009 2008 
Held-to-maturity  
FHLMC certificates $8,338 $11,274  $5,015 $8,338 
FNMA certificates 719,741 867,440  562,545 719,741 
          
 728,079 878,714  567,560 728,079 
          
Available-for-sale  
FHLMC certificates 1,892,358 158,953  722,249 1,892,358 
GNMA certificates 342,674 44,340  418,312 342,674 
FNMA certificates 1,373,977 902,198  1,507,792 1,373,977 
Mortgage pass-through certificates 113,983 133,678 
Collateralized Mortgage Obligations issued or guaranteed by FHLMC, FNMA and GNMA 156,307  
Other mortgage pass-through certificates 84,354 113,983 
          
 3,722,992 1,239,169  2,889,014 3,722,992 
          
Total mortgage-backed securities $4,451,071 $2,117,883  $3,456,574 $4,451,071 
          

8999


     The carrying values of investment securities classified as available-for-sale and held-to-maturity as of December 31, 20082009 by contractual maturity (excluding mortgage-backed securities and equity securities) are shown below:
                
 Carrying Weighted  Carrying Weighted 
(Dollars in thousands) amount average yield %  amount average yield % 
U.S. Government and agencies obligations  
Due within one year $8,455 1.07  $8,480 0.47 
Due after ten years 945,061 5.77  1,145,139 2.12 
          
 953,516 5.73  1,153,619 2.11 
          
  
Puerto Rico Government obligations  
Due within one year 4,639 6.18  11,989 1.82 
Due after one year through five years 110,404 5.41  113,487 5.40 
Due after five years through ten years 24,444 5.84  25,814 5.87 
Due after ten years 20,715 5.35  8,615 5.47 
          
 160,202 5.49  159,905 5.21 
          
 
Corporate bonds  
Due after five years through ten years 241 7.70 
Due after ten years 3,307 6.66  2,000 5.80 
     
 3,548 6.73 
          
  
Total 1,117,266 5.70  1,315,524 2.49 
  
Mortgage-backed securities 4,451,071 5.30  3,456,574 4.37 
Equity securities 669 2.38  303  
          
Total investment securities — available-for-sale and held-to-maturity $5,569,006 5.38 
Total investment securities available-for-sale and held-to-maturity $4,772,401 3.85 
          
     Total proceeds from the sale of securities during the year ended December 31, 20082009 amounted to approximately $680.0 million (2007$1.9 billion (2008$960.8$680.0 million). The Corporation realized gross gains of approximately $17.9$82.8 million (2007in 2009 (2008$5.1$17.9 million), and realized gross losses of approximately $0.2 million (2007 — $1.9 million).in 2008. There were no realized gross losses in 2009. The Corporation has other equity securities that do not have a readily available fair value. The carrying value of such securities as of December 31, 2009 and 2008 was $1.6 million. During 2009, the Corporation realized a gain of $3.8 million on the sale of VISA Class A stock. Also, during the first quarter of 2008, the Corporation realized a one-time gain of $9.3 million on the mandatory redemption of part of its investment in VISA, Inc., which completed its IPO in March 2008.
     DuringFor the yearyears ended on December 31, 2009 and 2008, the Corporation recorded other-than-temporary impairmentsOTTI charges of approximately $6.0$0.4 million (2007 — $5.9 million)and $1.8 million, respectively, on certain corporate bonds and equity securities held in its available-for-sale portfolio. Of the $6.0investment portfolio related to financial institutions in Puerto Rico. Also, OTTI charges of $4.2 million other-than-temporary impairmentswere recorded in 2008 approximately $4.2 million is related to auto industry corporate bonds held by FirstBank Florida.that were subsequently sold in 2009. Management concluded that the declines in value of the securities were other-than-temporary; as such, the cost basis of these securities was written down to the market value as of the date of the analysesanalysis and was reflected in earnings as a realized loss. TheWith respect to debt securitites, in 2009, the Corporation recorded OTTI charges through earnings of $1.3 million related to the credit loss portion of available-for-sale private label MBS. Refer to Note 4 to the Corporation’s remaining exposure to auto industry corporate bonds as offinancial statements for the year ended December 31, 2008 amounted to $1.5 million. The2009 included in Item 8 of this Form 10-K for additional information regarding the Corporation’s evaluation of other-than temporary impairment losses in 2007 were related to equityon held-to-maturity and available-for-sale securities.
     Net interest income of future periods maywill be affected by the acceleration in prepayments of mortgage-backed securities. Acceleration insecurities experienced during the prepayments of mortgage-backed securities would lower yields on securities purchased at a premium, asyear, investments sold, the amortization of premiums paid upon acquisition of these securities would accelerate. Conversely, acceleration in the prepayments of mortgage-backed securities would increase yields on securities purchased at a discount, as the amortizationcalls of the discount would accelerate.Agency notes, and the subsequent re-investment at lower then current yields. Also, net interest income in future periods might be affected by the Corporation’s investment in callable securities. Approximately $1.2 billion$945 million of U.S. Agency debentures with an average yield of 5.87%5.77% were called during 2008. However, given market opportunities, the Corporation bought U.S. government-sponsored agencies MBS amounting to $3.2 billion at an average yield of 5.44% during 2008, which is significantly higher than the cost of borrowings used to finance the purchase of such assets.2009. As of December 31, 2008,2009, the Corporation has approximately $0.9$1.1 billion in U.S. agency debentures with embedded calls. Lower reinvestment ratescalls and a time lag between calls, prepayments and/or the maturitywith an average yield of investments and actual reinvestment2.12% (mainly securities with contractual maturities of proceeds into new investments might affect net interest income2-3 years acquired in the future.2009). These risks are directly linked to future period market interest rate fluctuations. Refer to the “Risk Management” section discussion below for further analysis of the effects of changing interest rates on the Corporation’s net interest income and for the interest rate risk management strategies followed by the Corporation. Also refer to Note 4 to the Corporation’s audited financial statements for the year ended December 31, 20082009 included in Item 8 of this Form 10-K for additional information regarding the Corporation’s investment portfolio.

90100


Investment Securities and Loans Receivable Maturities
     The following table presents the maturities or repricing of the loan and investment portfolio as of December 31, 2008:2009:
                                                
 2-5 Years Over 5 Years    2-5 Years Over 5 Years   
 Fixed Variable Fixed Variable    Fixed Variable Fixed Variable   
 One Year Interest Interest Interest Interest    One Year Interest Interest Interest Interest   
 or Less Rates Rates Rates Rates Total  or Less Rates Rates Rates Rates Total 
 (In thousands)  (In thousands) 
Investments:(1)
  
Money market investments $76,003 $ $ $ $ $76,003  $24,286 $ $ $ $ $24,286 
Motgage-backed securities 336,564 635,863  3,478,644  4,451,071 
Mortgage-backed securities 449,798 676,992  2,329,784  3,456,574 
Other securities(2)
 77,623 110,623  993,834  1,182,080  96,957 1,252,700  36,100  1,385,757 
                          
Total investments 490,190 746,486  4,472,478  5,709,154  571,041 1,929,692  2,365,884  4,866,617 
                          
 
Loans:(1)(2)(3)
  
Residential real estate 635,283 374,381  2,482,064  3,491,728 
Commercial and commercial real estate 4,898,543 521,715 364,443 176,505  5,961,206 
Residential mortgage 777,931 376,867  2,461,485  3,616,283 
C&I and commercial mortgage 5,198,518 705,779 222,578 815,375  6,942,250 
Construction 1,481,557 23,218  22,220  1,526,995  1,436,136 24,967  31,486  1,492,589 
Finance leases 100,706 263,177    363,883  96,453 222,051    318,504 
Consumer 612,766 1,113,256  18,458  1,744,480  515,603 1,063,997    1,579,600 
                          
Total loans 7,728,855 2,295,747 364,443 2,699,247  13,088,292  8,024,641 2,393,661 222,578 3,308,346  13,949,226 
                          
 
Total earning assets $8,219,045 $3,042,233 $364,443 $7,171,725 $ $18,797,446  $8,595,682 $4,323,353 $222,578 $5,674,230 $ $18,815,843 
                          
 
(1) Scheduled repayments reported in the maturity category in which the payment is due and variable rates according to repricing frequency.
 
(2) Equity securities available-for-sale, other equity securities and loans having no stated scheduled of repayment and
no stated maturity were included under the “one year or less category”.
 
(3) Non-accruing loans were included under the “one year or less category”.
Goodwill and other intangible assets
     Business combinations are accounted for using the purchase method of accounting. Assets acquired and liabilities assumed are recorded at estimated fair value as of the date of acquisition. After initial recognition, any resulting intangible assets are accounted for as follows:
Goodwill
     The Corporation evaluates goodwill for impairment on an annual basis, or more often if events or circumstances indicate there may be an impairment. Goodwill impairment testing is performed at the segment (or “reporting unit”) level. Goodwill is assigned to reporting units at the date the goodwill is initially recorded. Once goodwill has been assigned to reporting units, it no longer retains its association with a particular acquisition, and all of the activities within a reporting unit, whether acquired or internally generated, are available to support the value of the goodwill. The Corporation’s goodwill is mainly related to the acquisition of FirstBank Florida in 2005. Effective July 1, 2009, the operations conducted by FirstBank Florida as a separate entity were merged with and into FirstBank Puerto Rico.
     The goodwill impairment analysis is a two-step process. The first step (“Step 1”) involves a comparison of the estimated fair value of the reporting unit (FirstBank Florida) to its carrying value, including goodwill. If the estimated fair value of a reporting unit exceeds its carrying value, goodwill is not considered impaired. If the carrying value exceeds estimated fair value, there is an indication of potential impairment and the second step is performed to measure the amount of the impairment.
     The second step (Step 2”) involves calculating an implied fair value of the goodwill for each reporting unit for which the first step indicated a potential impairment. The implied fair value of goodwill is determined in a manner similar to

101


the calculation of the amount of goodwill in a business combination, by measuring the excess of the estimated fair value of the reporting unit, as determined in the first step, over the aggregate estimated fair values of the individual assets, liabilities and identifiable intangibles as if the reporting unit was being acquired in a business combination. If the implied fair value of goodwill exceeds the carrying value of goodwill assigned to the reporting unit, there is no impairment. If the carrying value of goodwill assigned to a reporting unit exceeds the implied fair value of the goodwill, an impairment charge is recorded for the excess. An impairment loss cannot exceed the carrying value of goodwill assigned to a reporting unit, and the loss establishes a new basis in the goodwill. Subsequent reversal of goodwill impairment losses is not permitted.
     In determining the fair value of a reporting unit and based on the nature of the business and reporting unit’s current and expected financial performance, the Corporation uses a combination of methods, including market price multiples of comparable companies, as well as discounted cash flow analysis (“DCF”). The Corporation evaluates the results obtained under each valuation methodology to identify and understand the key value drivers in order to ascertain that the results obtained are reasonable and appropriate under the circumstances.
     The computations require management to make estimates and assumptions. Critical assumptions that are used as part of these evaluations include:
a selection of comparable publicly traded companies, based on nature of business, location and size;
the discount rate applied to future earnings, based on an estimate of the cost of equity;
the potential future earnings of the reporting unit; and
the market growth and new business assumptions.
     For purposes of the market comparable approach, valuation was determined by calculating median price to book value and price to tangible equity multiples of the comparable companies and applied these multiples to the reporting unit to derive an implied value of equity.
     For purposes of the DCF analysis approach, the valuation is based on estimated future cash flows. The financial projections used in the DCF analysis for the reporting unit are based on the most recent (as of the valuation date). The growth assumptions included in these projections are based on management’s expectations of the reporting unit’s financial prospects as well as particular plans for the entity (i.e. restructuring plans). The cost of equity was estimated using the capital asset pricing model (CAPM) using comparable companies, an equity risk premium, the rate of return of a “riskless” asset, and a size premium. The discount rate was estimated to be 14.0 percent. The resulting discount rate was analyzed in terms of reasonability given current market conditions.
     The Corporation conducted its annual evaluation of goodwill during the fourth quarter of 2009. The Step 1 evaluation of goodwill allocated to the Florida reporting unit, which is one level below the United States business segment, indicated potential impairment of goodwill. The Step 1 fair value for the unit under both valuation approaches (market and DCF) was below the carrying amount of its equity book value as of the valuation date (December 31), requiring the completion of Step 2. In accordance with accounting standards, the Corporation performed a valuation of all assets and liabilities of the Florida unit, including any recognized and unrecognized intangible assets, to determine the fair value of net assets. To complete Step 2, the Corporation subtracted from the unit’s Step 1 fair value the determined fair value of the net assets to arrive at the implied fair value of goodwill. The results of the Step 2 analysis indicated that the implied fair value of goodwill exceeded the goodwill carrying value of $27 million, resulting in no goodwill impairment. The analysis of results for Step 2 indicated that the reduction in the fair value of the reporting unit was mainly attributable to the deteriorated fair value of the loan portfolios and not the fair value of the reporting unit as going concern. The discount in the loan portfolios is mainly attributable to market participants’ expected rates of returns, which affected the market discount on the Florida commercial mortgage and residential mortgage portfolios. The fair value of the loan portfolio determined for the Florida reporting unit represented a discount of 22.5%.
     The reduction in Florida unit Step 1 fair value was offset by a reduction in the fair value of its net assets, resulting in an implied fair value of goodwill that exceeded the recorded book value of goodwill. If the Step 1 fair value of the Florida unit declines further without a corresponding decrease in the fair value of its net assets or if loan discounts improve without a corresponding increase in the Step 1 fair value, the Corporation may be required to

102


record a goodwill impairment charge. The Corporation engaged a third-party valuator to assist management in the annual evaluation of the Florida unit goodwill (including Step 1 and Step 2), including the valuation of loan portfolios as of the December 31 valuation date. In reaching its conclusion on impairment, management discussed with the valuator the methodologies, assumptions and results supporting the relevant values for the goodwill and determined that they were reasonable.
     The goodwill impairment evaluation process requires the Corporation to make estimates and assumptions with regards to the fair value of the reporting units. Actual values may differ significantly from these estimates. Such differences could result in future impairment of goodwill that would, in turn, negatively impact the Corporation’s results of operations and the reporting unit where goodwill is recorded.
     Goodwill was not impaired as of December 31, 2009 or 2008, nor was any goodwill written-off due to impairment during 2009, 2008 and 2007.
Other Intangibles
     Definite life intangibles, mainly core deposits, are amortized over their estimated life, generally on a straight-line basis, and are reviewed periodically for impairment when events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount may not be recoverable.
     As previously discussed, as a result of an impairment evaluation of core deposit intangibles, there was an impairment charge of $4.0 million recorded in 2009 related to core deposits of FirstBank Florida attributable to decreases in the base of acquired core deposits. The Corporation performed impairment tests for the year ended December 31, 2008 and 2007 and determined that no impairment was needed to be recognized for those periods for other intangible assets.
RISK MANAGEMENT
General
     Risks are inherent in virtually all aspects of the Corporation’s business activities and operations. Consequently, effective risk management is fundamental to the success of the Corporation. The primary goals of risk management are to ensure that the Corporation’s risk taking activities are consistent with the Corporation’s objectives and risk tolerance and that there is an appropriate balance between risk and reward in order to maximize stockholder value.
     The Corporation has in place a risk management framework to monitor, evaluate and manage the principal risks assumed in conducting its activities. First BanCorp’s business is subject to eight broad categories of risks: (1) liquidity risk, (2) interest rate risk, (3) market risk, (4) credit risk, (5) operational risk, (6) legal and compliance risk, (7) reputationreputational risk, and (8) contingency risk. First BanCorp has adopted policies and procedures designed to identify and manage risks to which the Corporation is exposed, specifically those relating to liquidity risk, interest rate risk, credit risk, and operational risk.

103


Risk Definition
Liquidity Risk
Liquidity risk is the risk to earnings or capital arising from the possibility that the Corporation will not have sufficient cash to meet the short-term liquidity demands such as from deposit redemptions or loan commitments. Refer to “—Liquidity and Capital Adequacy” section below for further details.
Interest Rate Risk

91


     Interest rate risk is the risk to earnings or capital arising from adverse movements in interest rates, refer to “—Interest Rate Risk Management” section below for further details.
Market Risk
     Market risk is the risk to earnings or capital arising from adverse movements in market rates or prices, such as interest rates or equity prices. The Corporation evaluates market risk together with interest rate risk, refer to “—Interest Rate Risk Management” section below for further details.
Credit Risk
     Credit risk is the risk to earnings or capital arising from a borrower’s or a counterparty’s failure to meet the terms of a contract with the Corporation or otherwise to perform as agreed. Refer to “—Credit Risk Management” section below for further details.
Operational Risk
     Operational risk is the risk of loss resulting from inadequate or failed internal processes, people and systems or from external events. This risk is inherent across all functions, products and services of the Corporation. Refer to “—Operational Risk” section below for further details.
Legal and Regulatory Risk
     Legal and regulatory risk is the risk to earnings and capital arising from the Corporation’s failure to comply with laws or regulations that can adversely affect the Corporation’s reputation and/or increase its exposure to litigation.
ReputationReputational Risk
     ReputationReputational risk is the risk to earnings and capital arising from any adverse impact on the Corporation’s market value, capital or earnings of negative public opinion, whether true or not. This risk affects the Corporation’s ability to establish new relationships or services, or to continue servicing existing relationships.
Contingency Risk
     Contingency risk is the risk to earnings and capital associated with the Corporation’s preparedness for the occurrence of an unforeseen event.
Risk Governance
     The following discussion highlights the roles and responsibilities of the key participants in the Corporation’s risk management framework:

104


Board of Directors
     The Board of Directors oversees the Corporation’s overall risk governance program with the assistance of the Asset and Liability Committee, Credit Committee and the Audit Committee in executing this responsibility.
Asset and Liability Committee
     The Asset and Liability Committee of the Corporation is appointed by the Board of Directors to assist the Board of Directors in its oversight of the Corporation’s policies and procedures related to asset and liability management relating to funds management, investment management, liquidity, interest rate risk management, capital adequacy and use of derivatives. In doing so, the Committee’s primary general functions involve:

92


  The establishment of a process to enable the recognition, assessment, and management of risks that could affect the Corporation’s assets and liabilities management;
 
  The identification of the Corporation’s risk tolerance levels for yield maximization relating to its assets and liabilities;
 
  The evaluation of the adequacy and effectiveness of the Corporation’s risk management process relating to the Corporation’s assets and liabilities, including management’s role in that process; and
 
  The evaluation of the Corporation’s compliance with its risk management process relating to the Corporation’s assets and liabilities.
Credit Committee
     The Credit Committee of the Board of Directors is appointed by the Board of Directors to assist them in its oversight of the Corporation’s policies and procedures related to all matters of the Corporation’s lending function. In doing so, the Committee’s primary general functions involve:
  The establishment of a process to enable the identification, assessment, and management of risks that could affect the Corporation’s credit management;
 
  The identification of the Corporation’s risk tolerance levels related to its credit management;
 
  The evaluation of the adequacy and effectiveness of the Corporation’s risk management process related to the Corporation’s credit management, including management’s role in that process;
 
  The evaluation of the Corporation’s compliance with its risk management process related to the Corporation’s credit management; and
 
  The approval of loans as required by the lending authorities approved by the Board of Directors.
Audit Committee
     The Audit Committee of First BanCorp is appointed by the Board of Directors to assist the Board of Directors in fulfilling its responsibility to oversee management regarding:
  The conduct and integrity of the Corporation’s financial reporting to any governmental or regulatory body, shareholders, other users of the Corporation’s financial reports and the public;
 
  theThe Corporation’s systems of internal control over financial reporting and disclosure controls and procedures;
The qualifications, engagement, compensation, independence and performance of the Corporation’s independent auditors, their conduct of the annual audit of the Corporation’s financial statements, and their engagement to provide any other services;

105


The qualifications, engagement, compensation, independence and performance of the Corporation’s independent auditors, their conduct of the annual audit of the Corporation’s financial statements, and their engagement to provide any other services;
  The Corporation’s legal and regulatory compliance;
 
  The application for the Corporation’s related person transaction policy as established by the Board of Directors;
 
  The application of the Corporation’s code of business conduct and ethics as established by management and the Board of Directors; and
 
  The preparation of the Audit Committee report required to be included in the Corporation’s annual proxy statement by the rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission.
In performing this function, the Audit Committee is assisted by the Chief Risk Officer (“CRO”), the General Auditor and the Risk Management Council (“RMC”), and other members of senior management.

93

Strategic Planning Committee


     The Strategic Planning Committee of the Corporation is appointed by the Board of Directors of the Corporation to assist and advise management with respect to, and monitor and oversee on behalf of the Board, corporate development activities not in the ordinary course of the Corporation’s business and strategic alternatives under consideration from time to time by the Corporation, including, but not limited to, acquisitions, mergers, alliances, joint ventures, divestitures, capitalization of the Corporation and other similar corporate transactions.
Risk Management Council
     The Risk Management Council is appointed by the Chief Executive Officer to assist the Corporation in overseeing, and receiving information regarding the Corporation’s policies, procedures and practices related to the Corporation’s risks. In doing so, the Council’s primary general functions involve:
  The appointment of owners ofpersons responsible for the Corporation’s significant Corporation’s risks;
 
  The development of the risk management infrastructure needed to enable it to monitor risk policies and limits established by the Board of Directors;
 
  The evaluation of the risk management process to identify any gap and the implementation of any necessary control to close such gap;
 
  The establishment of a process to enable the recognition, assessment, and management of risks that could affect the Corporation; and
 
  Ensure thatThe provision to the Board of Directors receivesof appropriate information about the Corporation’s risks.
     Refer to “Interest Rate Risk, Credit Risk, Liquidity, Operational, Legal and Regulatory Risk Management -Operational Risk” discussion below for further details of matters discussed in the Risk Management Council.
Other Management Committees
     As part of its governance framework, the Corporation has various additional risk management related-committees. These committees are jointly responsible for ensuring adequate risk measurement and management in their respective areas of authority. At the management level, these committees include:

106


 (1) Management’s Investment and Asset Liability Committee (“MIALCO”) — oversees interest rate and market risk, liquidity management and other related matters. Refer to “—Liquidity Risk and Capital Adequacy and Interest Rate Risk Management” discussions below for further details.
 
 (2) Information Technology Steering Committee — is responsible for the oversight of and counsel on matters related to information technology including the development of information management policies and procedures throughout the Corporation.
 
 (3) Bank Secrecy Act Committee — is responsible for oversight, monitoring and reporting of the Corporation’s compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act.
 
 (4) Credit Committees (Delinquency and Credit Management Committee) — overseeoversees and establishestablishes standards for credit risk management processes within the Corporation. The Credit Management Committee is responsible for the approval of loans above an established size threshold. The Delinquency Committee is responsible for the periodic review of (1) past due loans, (2) overdrafts, (3) non-accrual loans, (4) other real estate owned (“OREO”) assets, and (5) the bank’s watch list and non-performing loans.
(5)Florida Executive Steering Committee — oversees implementation and compliance of policies approved by the Board of Directors and the performance of the Florida region’s operations. The Florida Executive Steering Committee evaluates and monitors interrelated risks related to FirstBank’s operations in Florida.

94


Officers
     As part of its governance framework, the following officers play a key role in the Corporation’s risk management process:
 (1) Chief Executive Officer and Chief Operating Officer areis responsible for the overall risk governance structure of the Corporation.
 
 (2) Chief Risk Officer is responsible for the oversight of the risk management organization as well as risk governance processes. In addition, the CRO with the collaboration of the Risk Assessment Manager manages the operational risk program.
 
 (3) Chief Credit Risk Officer and the Chief Lending Officer are responsible of managing the Corporation’s credit risk program.
 
 (4) Chief Financial Officer in combination with the Corporation’s Treasurer, manages the Corporation’s interest rate and market and liquidity risks programs and, in combinationtogether with the Corporation’s Chief Accounting Officer, is responsible for the implementation of accounting policies and practices in accordance with GAAP and applicable regulatory requirements. The Chief Financial Officer is assisted by the Risk Assessment Manager forin the review of the Corporation’s internal control over financial reporting.
 
 (5) Chief Accounting Officer is responsible for the development and implementation of the Corporation’s accounting policies and practices and the review and monitoring of critical accounts and transactions to ensure that they are managed in accordance with GAAP and applicable regulatory requirements.
Other Officers
     In addition to a centralized Enterprise Risk Management function, certain lines of business and corporate functions have their own Risk Managers and support staff. The Risk Managers, while reporting directly within their respective line of business or function, facilitate communications with the Corporation’s risk functions and work in partnership with the CRO orand CFO to ensure alignment with sound risk management practices and expedite the implementation of the enterprise risk management framework and policies.

107


Liquidity and Capital Adequacy, Interest Rate Risk, Credit Risk, Operational, Legal and Regulatory Risk Management
     The following discussion highlights First BanCorp’s adopted policies and procedures for liquidity risk, interest rate risk, credit risk, operational risk, legal and regulatory risk.
Liquidity Risk and Capital Adequacy
     Liquidity is the ongoing ability to accommodate liability maturities and deposit withdrawals, fund asset growth and business operations, and meet contractual obligations through unconstrained access to funding at reasonable market rates. Liquidity management involves forecasting funding requirements and maintaining sufficient capacity to meet the needs and accommodate fluctuations in asset and liability levels due to changes in the Corporation’s business operations or unanticipated events.
     The Corporation manages liquidity at two levels. The first is the liquidity of the parent company, which is the holding company that owns the banking and nonbankingnon-banking subsidiaries. The second is the liquidity of the banking subsidiaries.subsidiary. The Asset and Liability Committee of the Board of Directors is responsible for establishing the Corporation’s liquidity policy as well as approving operating and contingency procedures, and monitoring liquidity on an ongoing basis. The MIALCO, using measures of liquidity developed by management, which involve the use of several assumptions, reviews the Corporation’s liquidity position on a monthly basis. The MIALCO oversees liquidity management, interest rate risk and other related matters. The MIALCO, which reports to the Board of Directors’ Asset and Liability Committee, is composed of senior management officers, including the Chief Executive Officer, the Chief Financial Officer, the Chief Operating Officer, the Chief Risk Officer, the Wholesale

95


Banking Executive, the Retail Financial Services & Strategic Planning Director, the Risk Manager of the Treasury and Investments Division, the Asset/Liability Manager and the Treasurer. The Treasury and Investments Division is responsible for planning and executing the Corporation’s funding activities and strategy; monitors liquidity availability on a daily basis and reviews liquidity measures on a weekly basis. The Treasury and Investments Accounting and Operations area of the Comptroller’s Department is responsible for calculating the liquidity measurements used by the Treasury and Investment Division to review the Corporation’s liquidity position.
     In order to ensure adequate liquidity through the full range of potential operating environments and market conditions, the Corporation conducts its liquidity management and business activities in a manner that will preserve and enhance funding stability, flexibility and diversity. Key components of this operating strategy include a strong focus on the continued development of customer-based funding, maintainingthe maintenance of direct relationships with wholesale market funding providers, and maintainingthe maintenance of the ability to liquidate certain assets when, and if, requirements warrant.
     The Corporation develops and maintains contingency funding plans for both, the parent company and bank liquidity positions.plans. These plans evaluate the Corporation’s liquidity position under various operating circumstances and allow the Corporation to ensure that it will be able to operate through periods of stress when access to normal sources of funding is constrained. The plans project funding requirements during a potential period of stress, specify and quantify sources of liquidity, outline actions and procedures for effectively managing through a difficult period, and define roles and responsibilities. In the Contingency Funding Plan, the Corporation stresses the balance sheet and the liquidity position to critical levels that imply difficulties in getting new funds or even maintaining its current funding position, thereby ensuring the ability to honor its commitments, and establishing liquidity triggers monitored by the MIALCO in order to maintain the ordinary funding of the banking business. Three different scenarios are defined in the Contingency Funding Plan: local market event, credit rating downgrade, and a concentration event. They are reviewed and approved annually by the Board of Directors’ Asset and Liability Committee.
     The Corporation manages its liquidity in a proactive manner, and maintains aan adequate position. Multiple measures are utilized to monitor the Corporation’s liquidity position, including basic surplus and volatile liabilities measures. Among the actions taken in recent months to bolster the liquidity position and to safeguard the Corporation’s access to credit was the posting of additional collateral to the FHLB, thereby increasing borrowing capacity. The Corporation has also maintained the basic surplus (cash, short-term assets minus short-term liabilities, and secured lines of credit) well in excess of a 5%the self-imposed minimum limit amount overof 5% of total assets. As of December 31, 2008,2009, the estimated basic surplus ratio of approximately 11.2%8.6% included un-pledged assets,unpledged investment securities, FHLB lines of credit, collateral pledged at the FED Discount Window Program, and cash. Un-pledged assetsAs of December 31, 2009, the Corporation had $378 million available for additional credit on FHLB lines of credit. Unpledged liquid securities as of December 31, 2008 are2009 mainly composedconsisted of Puerto Rico Government fixed-rate MBS

108


and U.S. Agency fixed-rateagency debentures and MBS totaling $925.5 million, which can be sold under agreements to repurchase.approximately $646.9 million. The Corporation does not rely on uncommitted inter-bank lines of credit (federal funds lines) to fund its operations;operations and does not include them in the basic surplus computation. The financial market disruptions that began in 2007, and became exacerbated in 2008, continued to impact the financial services sector and may affect access to regular and customary sources of funding, including repurchase agreements, as counterparties may not be willing to enter into additional agreements in order to protect their liquidity. However, the Corporation has taken direct actions to enhance its liquidity positions and to safeguard its access to credit. Such initiatives include, among other things, the posting of additional collateral and thereby increasing its borrowing capacity with the FHLB and the FED through the Discount Window Program, the issuance of additional brokered CDs to increase its liquidity levels and the extension of its borrowing maturities to reduce exposure to high levels of market volatility. The Corporation understands that current conditions of liquidity and credit limitations could continue to be observed well into 2009. Thus, the Corporation will continue to monitor the different alternatives available under programs announced by the FED and the FDIC such as the Term Auction Facility (TAF) for short-term loans and has decided to continue its participation in the FDIC’s voluntary Temporary Liquidity Guarantee Program. This program insures 100% of deposits that are held in non-interest bearing deposit transaction accounts and guarantees newly issued senior unsecured debt of banks, under certain conditions.
     Sources of Funding
     The Corporation utilizes different sources of funding to help ensure that adequate levels of liquidity are available when needed. Diversification of funding sources is of great importance to protect the Corporation’s liquidity from market disruptions. The principal sources of short-term funds are deposits, including brokered CDs, securities sold under agreements to repurchase, and lines of credit with the FHLB and the FED Discount Window Program, and other unsecured lines established with financial institutions.FED. The CreditAsset Liability Committee of the Board of Directors reviews credit availability on a regular basis. In the past, theThe Corporation has also securitized and sold mortgage loans as a supplementary source of funding. Commercial paper has also in the past provided additional funding. Long-term funding as well as long-term fundinghas also been obtained through the issuance

96


of notes and, to a lesser extent, long-term brokered CDs. The cost of these different alternatives and interest rate risk management strategies, among other things, is taken into consideration.
     Recent initiatives by the FED to ease the credit crisis have included, among other things, cuts to the discount rate, the availability of the Term Auction Facility (“TAF”) to provide short-term loans to banks and expanding the qualifying collateral it will lend against, to include commercial paper. The FDIC also raised the cap on deposit insurance coverage from $100,000 to $250,000 until December 31, 2009. These actions made the federal government a viable source of funding in the current environment.
The Corporation’s principal sources of funding are:
     Deposits
     The following table presents the composition of total deposits:
                                
 Weighted-Average    Weighted-Average   
 Rate as of As of December 31,  Rate as of As of December 31, 
 December 31, 2008 2008 2007 2006  December 31, 2009 2009 2008 2007 
 (Dollars in thousands)  (Dollars in thousands) 
Savings accounts  1.98% $1,288,179 $1,036,662 $984,332   1.68% $1,774,273 $1,288,179 $1,036,662 
Interest-bearing checking accounts  2.09% 726,731 518,570 433,278   1.75% 985,470 726,731 518,570 
Certificates of deposits  3.94% 10,416,592 8,857,405 8,795,692 
Certificates of deposit  2.17% 9,212,282 10,416,592 8,857,405 
              
Interest-bearing deposits  3.63% 12,431,502 10,412,637 10,213,302   2.06% 11,972,025 12,431,502 10,412,637 
Non-interest-bearing deposits 625,928 621,884 790,985  697,022 625,928 621,884 
              
Total $13,057,430 $11,034,521 $11,004,287  $12,669,047 $13,057,430 $11,034,521 
              
  
Interest-bearing deposits:  
 
Average balance outstanding $11,282,353 $10,755,719 $11,873,608  $11,387,958 $11,282,353 $10,755,719 
  
Non-interest-bearing deposits:  
 
Average balance outstanding $682,496 $563,990 $771,343  $715,982 $682,496 $563,990 
  
Weighted average rate during the period on interest-bearing deposits(1)
  3.75%  4.88%  4.63%  2.79%  3.75%  4.88%
 
(1) Excludes changes in fair value of callable brokered CDs elected to be measured at fair value under SFAS 159 and changes in the fair value of derivatives that economically hedge (economically or under fair value hedge accounting) brokered CDs and the basis adjustment..
Brokered CDs— A large portion of the Corporation’s funding is retail brokered CDs issued by the Bank subsidiary, FirstBank Puerto Rico. Total brokered CDs increaseddecreased from $7.2$8.4 billion at year end 20072008 to $8.4$7.6 billion as of December 31, 2008.2009. The Corporation has been issuingpartly refinancing brokered CDs that matured or were called during 2009 with alternate sources of funding at a lower cost. Also, the Corporation shifted the funding emphasis to finance its lending activities, pay off repurchase agreements issuedretail deposits to finance the purchase of MBS in the first half of 2008, accumulate additional liquidity due to current market volatility, and extend the maturity of its borrowings.reduce reliance on brokered CDs.
In the event that the Corporation’s Bank subsidiary falls below the ratios of a well-capitalized institution, it faces the risk of not being able to replace funding through this source. Only a well capitalized insured depository institution is allowed to solicit and accept, renew or roll over any brokered deposit without restriction. The Bank currently complies and exceeds the minimum requirements of ratios for a “well-capitalized” institutioninstitution. As of December 31, 2009, the Bank’s total and does not foresee falling below required levels to issue brokered deposits.Tier I capital exceed by $410 million and $814 million, respectively, the minimum well-capitalized levels. The average term to maturity of the retail brokered CDs outstanding as of

109


December 31, 20082009 is approximately 2.5 years.1 year. Approximately 24%2% of the principal value of these certificates is callable at the Corporation’s option.
The use of brokered CDs has been particularly important for the growth of the Corporation. The Corporation encounters intense competition in attracting and retaining regular retail deposits in Puerto Rico. The brokered CDs market is very competitive and liquid, and the Corporation has been able to obtain substantial amounts of

97


funding in short periods of time. This strategy enhances the Corporation’s liquidity position, since the brokered CDs are insured by the FDIC up to regulatory limits and can be obtained faster and cheaper compared to regular retail deposits. Demand forThe brokered CDs has recently increased asmarket continues to be a resultreliable source to fulfill the Corporation’s needs for the issuance of the move by investors from riskier investments, such as equities, to federally guaranteed instruments such as brokered CDsnew and the recent increase in FDIC deposit insurance from $100,000 to $250,000.replacement transactions. For the year ended December 31, 2008,2009, the Corporation issued $9.8$8.3 billion in brokered CDs (including rolloverrollovers of short-term broker CDs and replacement of brokered CDs called) at an average rate of 0.97% compared to $4.3$9.8 billion for 2007.at an average rate of 3.64% issued in 2008.
The following table presents a maturity summary of brokered and retail CDs with denominations of $100,000 or higher as of December 31, 2008.2009.
        
 (In thousands)  (In thousands) 
Three months or less $1,763,086  $1,958,454 
Over three months to six months 1,065,688  1,366,163 
Over six months to one year 2,304,775  2,258,717 
Over one year 4,485,993  2,969,471 
      
Total $9,619,542  $8,552,805 
      
Certificates of deposit in denominations of $100,000 or higher include brokered CDs of $8.4$7.6 billion issued to deposit brokers in the form of large ($100,000 or more) certificates of deposit that are generally participated out by brokers in shares of less than $100,000 and are therefore insured by the FDIC. Certificates of deposit also include $25.6 million of deposits through the Certificate of Deposit Account Registry Service (CDARS). In an effort to meet customer needs and provide its customers with the best products and services available, the Corporation’s bank subsidiary, FirstBank Puerto Rico, has joined a program that gives depositors the opportunity to insure their money beyond the standard FDIC coverage. CDARS can offer customers access to FDIC insurance coverage of up to $50 million, when they enter into the CDARS Deposit Placement Agreement, while earning attractive returns on their deposits.
Retail depositsThe Corporation’s deposit products also include regular savings accounts, demand deposit accounts, money market accounts and retail CDs. The Corporation experiencedTotal deposits, excluding brokered CDs, increased by $480 million from the balance as of December 31, 2008, reflecting increases in all sectors including individuals, businesscore-deposit products such as savings and government (mainly certificates issued to agenciesinterest-bearing checking accounts. A significant portion of the Government ofincrease was related to deposits in Puerto Rico, and to Government agencies in the Virgin Islands)Corporation’s primary market, reflecting successful directmarketing campaigns and cross-selling strategies.initiatives. The increase was also related to increases in money market accounts in Florida, as management shifted the funding emphasis to retail deposits to reduce reliance on brokered CDs. Successful marketing campaigns and attractive rates were the main reasons for the increase in Florida. Even thought rates offered in Florida were higher for this product, rates were lower than those offered in Puerto Rico. Refer to Note 1213 in the Corporation’s audited financial statements for the year ended December 31, 20082009 included in Item 8 of this Form 10-K for further details.

110


Borrowings
     As of December 31, 2008,2009, total borrowings amounted to $4.7$5.2 billion as compared to $4.5$4.7 billion and $4.7$4.5 billion as of December 31, 20072008 and 2006,2007, respectively.
     The following table presents the composition of total borrowings as of the dates indicated:
                                
 Weighted Average    Weighted Average   
 Rate as of As of December 31,  Rate as of As of December 31, 
 December 31, 2008 2008 2007 2006  December 31, 2009 2009 2008 2007 
 (Dollars in thousands)  (Dollars in thousands) 
Federal funds purchased and securities sold under agreements to repurchase  3.85% $3,421,042 $3,094,646 $3,687,724   3.34% $3,076,631 $3,421,042 $3,094,646 
Loans payable (1)  1.00% 900,000   
Advances from FHLB  3.09% 1,060,440 1,103,000 560,000   3.21% 978,440 1,060,440 1,103,000 
Notes payable  5.08% 23,274 30,543 182,828   4.63% 27,117 23,274 30,543 
Other borrowings  4.28% 231,914 231,817 231,719   2.86% 231,959 231,914 231,817 
              
Total (1) $4,736,670 $4,460,006 $4,662,271 
Total (2) $5,214,147 $4,736,670 $4,460,006 
              
Weighted-average rate during the period  3.78%  5.06%  4.99%  2.79%  3.78%  5.06%
 
(1) Advances from the FED under the FED Discount Window Program.
(2)Includes $1.6$3.0 billion as of December 31, 2008 which2009 that are tied to variable rates or matured within a year.

98


Securities sold under agreements to repurchase— The growth of the Corporation’s investment portfolio is substantially funded with repurchase agreements. Securities sold under repurchase agreements were $3.1 billion at December 31, 2009, compared with $3.4 billion at December 31, 2008, compared with $2.9 billion at December 31, 2007.2008. One of the Corporation’s strategies is the use of structured repurchase agreements and long-term repurchase agreements to reduce exposure to interest rate risk by lengthening the final maturities of its liabilities while keeping funding cost at reasonable levels. Of the total of $3.4$3.1 billion repurchase agreements outstanding as of December 31, 2008,2009, approximately $2.4 billion consist of structured reposrepo’s and $600$500 million of long-term repos. The access to this type of funding has beenwas affected by the current liquidity problemsturmoil in the financial markets as certainwitnessed in the second half of 2008 and in 2009. Certain counterparties arehave not been willing to enter into additional repurchase agreements and the capacity to extend the term of maturing repurchase agreements has also been reduced.reduced, however, the Corporation has been able to keep access to credit by using cost effective sources such as FED and FHLB advances. Refer to Note 1315 in the Corporation’s audited financial statements for the year ended December 31, 20082009 included in Item 8 of this Form 10-K for further details about repurchase agreements outstanding by counterparty and maturities.
Under the Corporation’s repurchase agreements, as is the case with derivative contracts, the Corporation is required to depositpledge cash or qualifying securities to meet margin requirements. To the extent that the value of securities previously pledged as collateral declines because ofdue to changes in interest rates, a liquidity crisis or any other factor, the Corporation will be required to deposit additional cash or securities to meet its margin requirements, thereby adversely affecting its liquidity. Given the quality of the collateral pledged, recently the Corporation didhas not experienceexperienced significant margin calls from counterparties recently arising from writedownscredit-quality-related write-downs in valuations.valuations with only $0.95 million of cash equivalent instruments deposited in connection with collateralized interest rate swap agreements.
Advances from the FHLB —The Corporation’s Bank subsidiary is a member of the FHLB system and obtains advances to fund its operations under a collateral agreement with the FHLB that requires the Bank to maintain minimum qualifying mortgages as collateral for advances taken. As of December 31, 20082009 and 2007,December 31, 2008, the outstanding balance of FHLB advances was $978.4 million and $1.1 billion.billion, respectively. Approximately $678.4$653.4 million of outstanding advances from the FHLB maturedhas maturities over one year. As part of its precautionary initiatives to safeguard access to credit and the low level of interest rates, the Corporation increasedhas been increasing its capacity underpledging of assets to the FHLB, while at the same time the FHLB has been revising their credit facilities by posting additional collateralguidelines and as“haircuts” in the computation of December 31, 2008, it had $729 million available for additional borrowings.availability of credit lines.

111


FED Discount window —FED initiatives to ease the credit crisis have included cuts to the discount rate, which was lowered from 4.75% to 0.50% through eight separate actions since December 2007, and adjustments to previous practices to facilitate financing for longer periods. This makesThat made the FED Discount Window a viable source of funding given current market conditions. The Corporation has pledged U.S. government agency fixed-rate MBS on this short-term borrowing channel and recently has increased its capacity by posting additional collateral withconditions in 2009. As of December 31, 2009, the FED. The Corporation had $479$900 million available for use throughoutstanding in short-term borrowings from the FED Discount Window Program and no amount outstanding as of December 31, 2008. Furthermore, FirstBank requested approval and began procedures for compliance with requirements for participation in the Borrower-in-Custody Program (“BIC”). Through the BIC program a broad range of loans (includinghad collateral pledged related to this credit facility amounted to $1.2 billion, mainly commercial, consumer and mortgages) may be pledged and borrowed against it through the Discount Window. In January 2009, the Bank received approval for participation in the program and began utilizing it as an additional source of funding. Over $2.0 billion of loans are in the process of selection and eligibility qualification for pledging under the program.mortgage loan.
Credit Lines— The Corporation maintains unsecured and un-committed lines of credit with other banks. As of December 31, 2008,2009, the Corporation’s total unused lines of credit with other banks amounted to $220$165 million. The Corporation has not used these lines of credit.credit to fund its operations.
     Though currently not in use, other sources of short-term funding for the Corporation include commercial paper and federal funds purchased. Furthermore, in previous years the Corporation has entered in previous years into several financing transactions to diversify its funding sources, including the issuance of notes payable and Junior subordinated debentures as part of its longer-term liquidity and capital management activities. AmongNo assurance can be given that these sources of liquidity will be available and, if available, will be on comparable terms. The Corporation continues to evaluate its funding sources are notes payablefinancing options, including available options resulting from recent federal government initiatives to deal with a carrying value of $23.3 million as of December 31, 2008.the crisis in the financial markets.
     In 2004, FBP Statutory Trust I, a statutory trust that is wholly owned by the Corporation and not consolidated in the Corporation’s financial statements, sold to institutional investors $100 million of its variable rate trust preferred securities. The proceeds of the issuance, together with the proceeds of the purchase by the Corporation of $3.1 million of FBP Statutory Trust I variable rate common securities, were used by FBP Statutory Trust I to purchase $103.1 million aggregate principal amount of the Corporation’s Junior Subordinated Deferrable Debentures.
     Also in 2004, FBP Statutory Trust II, a statutory trust that is wholly-owned by the Corporation and not consolidated in the Corporation’s financial statements, sold to institutional investors $125 million of its variable rate trust preferred securities. The proceeds of the issuance, together with the proceeds of the purchase by the

99


Corporation of $3.9 million of FBP Statutory Trust II variable rate common securities, were used by FBP Statutory Trust II to purchase $128.9 million aggregate principal amount of the Corporation’s Junior Subordinated Deferrable Debentures.
     The trust preferred debentures are presented in the Corporation’s Consolidated Statement of Financial Condition as Other Borrowings, net of related issuance costs. The variable rate trust preferred securities are fully and unconditionally guaranteed by the Corporation. The $100 million Junior Subordinated Deferrable Debentures issued by the Corporation in April 2004 and the $125 million issued in September 2004 mature on September 17, 2034 and September 20, 2034, respectively; however, under certain circumstances, the maturity of Junior Subordinated Debentures may be shortened (which(such shortening would result in a mandatory redemption of the variable rate trust preferred securities). The trust preferred securities, subject to certain limitations, qualify as Tier I regulatory capital under current Federal Reserve rules and regulations.
     The Corporation continues to evaluate its financing options, including available options resulting from recent federal government initiatives to deal with the crisis in the financial markets.
The Corporation’s principal uses of funds are the origination of loans and the repayment of maturing brokered CDsdeposits and borrowings. Over the last fourfive years, the Corporation has committed substantial resources to its mortgage banking subsidiary, FirstMortgage, Inc. As a result, residential real estate loans as a percentage of total loans receivable have increased over time from 14% at December 31, 2004 to 27%26% at December 31, 2008.2009. Commensurate with the increase in its mortgage banking activities, the Corporation has also invested in technology and personnel to enhance the Corporation’s secondary mortgage market capabilities. The enhanced capabilities improve the Corporation’s liquidity profile as it allowsthey allow the Corporation to derive liquidity, if needed, from the sale of mortgage loans in the secondary market. Recent disruptions in the credit markets and a reduced investors’ demand for mortgage debt have adversely affected the liquidity of the secondary mortgage markets. The U.S. (including Puerto Rico) secondary mortgage market is still highly liquid in large part because of the sale or guarantee programs of the FHA, VA, HUD, FNMA and FHLMC. In connection with the placement of FNMA and FHLMC into conservatorship by the U.S. Treasury in September 2008, the Treasury entered into agreements to invest up to approximately $100 billion in each agency. In December 2008, the Corporation obtained from GNMA Commitment Authority to issue GNMA mortgage-backed securities for approximately $50.5 million.securities. Under this program, during 2009, the Corporation will begin securitizing and sellingcompleted the securitization of approximately $305.4 million of FHA/VA mortgage loan productionloans into GNMA MBS. Any regulatory actions affecting GNMA, FNMA or FHLMC could adversely affect the secondary markets.mortgage market.

112


Credit Ratings
     FirstBank’sThe Corporation’s credit as a long-term issuer is currently rated B by Standard & Poor’s (“S&P”) and B- by Fitch Ratings Limited (“Fitch”); both with negative outlook.
     At the FirstBank subsidiary level, long-term senior debt rating is currently rated Ba1B1 by Moody’s Investor Service (“Moodys”), four notches below their definition of investment grade; B by S&P, and BB+B by Standard & Poor’s (“S&P”), one notch underFitch, both five notches below their definition of investment grade. Fitch Ratings Ltd. (“Fitch”) has ratedThe outlook on the Corporation’s long-term senior debt a rating of BB, which is two notches under investment grade. However, theBank’s credit ratings outlook for Moody’s and S&P are stable while Fitch’sfrom the three rating agencies is negative.
     The Corporation does not have any outstanding debt or derivative agreements that would be affected by athe recent credit downgrade.downgrades. The Corporation’s liquidity is contingent upon its ability to obtain external sources of funding to finance its operations. Any futurefurther downgrades in credit ratings can hinder the Corporation’s access to external funding and/or cause external funding to be more expensive, which could in turn adversely affect the results of operations. Also, any change in credit ratings may affect the fair value of certain liabilities and unsecured derivatives whichthat consider the Corporation’s own credit risk as part of the valuation.

100


Cash Flows
     Cash and cash equivalents was $405.7were $704.1 million and $378.9$405.7 million as of December 31, 20082009 and 2007,2008, respectively. These balances increased by $66.2$298.4 million and decreased by $189.9$26.8 million from December 31, 20072008 and 2006,2007, respectively. The following discussion highlights the major activities and transactions that affected the Corporation’s cash flows during 20082009 and 2007.2008.
     Cash Flows from Operating Activities
     First BanCorp’s operating assets and liabilities vary significantly in the normal course of business due to the amount and timing of cash flows. Management believes cash flows from operations, available cash balances and the Corporation’s ability to generate cash through short- and long-term borrowings will be sufficient to fund the Corporation’s operating liquidity needs.
     For the year ended December 31, 2009, net cash provided by operating activities was $243.2 million. Net cash generated from operating activities was higher than net loss reported largely as a result of adjustments for operating items such as the provision for loan and lease losses and non-cash charges recorded to increase the Corporation’s valuation allowance for deferred tax assets.
     For the year ended December 31, 2008, net cash provided by operating activities was $175.9 million. Net cash generated from operating activitiesmillion, which was higher than net income, largely as a result of adjustments for operating items such as the provision for loan and lease losses and depreciation and amortization.
     For the year ended December 31, 2007, net cash provided by operating activities was $60.3 million, which was lower than net income as a result of: (i) the monetary payment of $74.25 million during the third quarter of 2007 for the settlement of the class action brought against the Corporation relating to the accounting for mortgage-related transactions that led to the restatement of financial statements for years 2000 through 2004, and (ii) non-cash adjustments, including the accretion and discount amortizations associated to the Corporation’s investment portfolio.
Cash Flows from Investing Activities
     The Corporation’s investing activities primarily include originating loans to be held to maturity and its available-for-sale and held-to-maturity investment portfolios. For the year ended December 31, 2008,2009, net cash of $2.3 billion$381.8 million was used in investing activities, primarily for loan origination disbursements and purchases of available-for-sale investment securities to mitigate in part the impact of investments securities mainly U.S. Agency debentures, called by counterparties prior to maturity and MBS prepayments. Partially offsetting these uses of cash were proceeds from sales and maturities of available-for-sale securities as well as proceeds from held-to-maturity securities called during 2009, and proceeds from loans and from MBS repayments.

113


     For the year ended December 31, 2008, net cash used by investing activities was $2.3 billion, primarily for purchases of available-for-sale investment securities as market conditions presented an opportunity for the Corporation to obtain attractive yields, improve its net interest margin and mitigate the impact of investmentsinvestment securities, mainly U.S. Agency debentures, called by counterparties prior to maturity, for loan originations disbursements and for the purchase of a $218 million auto loan portfolio. Partially offsetting these uses of cash were proceeds from sales and maturities of available-for-sale securities as well as proceeds from held-to-maturity securities called during 2008; proceeds from sales of loans and the gain on the mandatory redemption of part of the Corporation’s investment in VISA, Inc., which completed its initial public offering (IPO) in March 2008.
     For the year ended December 31, 2007, net cash used by investing activities was $136.6 million, also due to loan origination disbursements and purchases of mortgage loans as well as purchases of investment securities.
Cash Flows from Financing Activities
     The Corporation’s financing activities primarily include the receipt of deposits and issuance of brokered CDs, the issuance and payments of long-term debt, the issuance of equity instruments and activities related to its short-term funding. In addition, the Corporation payspaid monthly dividends on its preferred stock and quarterly dividends on its common stock. Instock until it announced the suspension of dividends beginning in August 2009. For the year ended December 31, 2009, net cash provided by financing activities was $436.9 million due to the investment of $400 million by the U.S. Treasury in preferred stock of the Corporation through the U.S. Treasury TARP Capital Purchase Program and the use of the FED Discount Window Program as a low-cost funding source to finance the Corporation’s investing activities. Partially offsetting these cash proceeds was the payment of cash dividends and pay down of maturing borrowings, in particular brokered CDs and repurchase agreements.
     For the year ended December 31, 2008, net cash provided byused in financing activities was $2.1 billion due to increases in its deposit base, including brokered CDs to finance lending activities and increase liquidity levels and increases in securities sold under repurchase agreements to finance the Corporation’s securities inventory. Partially offsetting these cash proceeds was the payment of cash dividends.

101


     In 2007, net cash used in financing activities was $113.5 million due to a net decrease in securities sold under repurchase agreements aligned with the Corporation’s decrease in investment securities that resulted from maturities and prepayments received and the Corporation’s decision back in 2007 to de-leverage its investment portfolio in order to protect earnings from margin erosions under a flat-to-inverted yield curve scenario; the early redemption of a $150 million medium-term note during the second quarter of 2007 and the payment of cash dividends. Partially offsetting these uses of cash were proceeds from the issuance of brokered CDs and additional advances from the FHLB used in part to pay down repurchase agreements and notes payable and proceeds from the issuance of 9.250 million common shares in a private placement.
Capital
     The Corporation’s stockholders’ equity amounted to $1.5$1.6 billion as of December 31, 2008,2009, an increase of $126.5$50.9 million compared to the balance as of December 31, 2007,2008, driven by the $400 million investment by the United States Department of the Treasury (the “U.S. Treasury”) in preferred stock of the Corporation through the U.S. Treasury Troubled Asset Relief Program (TARP) Capital Purchase Program. This was partially offset by the net incomeloss of $109.9$275.2 million recorded for 20082009, dividends paid amounting to $43.1 million in 2009 ($13.0 million in common stock, or $0.14 per share, and $30.1 million in preferred stock) and a net unrealized gain$30.9 million decrease in other comprehensive income mainly due to a noncredit-related impairment of $82.7$31.7 million on the fair value of available-for-sale securities recorded as part of comprehensive income. The increase in the fair value of MBS was mainly in response to the announcement by the U.S. government that it will invest up to $600 billion in obligations from housing-related government-sponsored agencies, including $500 billion in MBS backed by FNMA, FHLMC and GNMA. Partially offsetting these increases were dividends declared during 2008 amounting to $66.2 million.private label MBS.
     For each of the yearsyear ended on December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006,2009, the Corporation declared in aggregate cash dividends of $0.28$0.14 per common share.share, $0.28 for 2008, and $0.28 for 2007. Total cash dividends paid on common shares amounted to $13.0 million for 2009, $25.9 million for 2008, (or a 37% dividend payout ratio),and $24.6 million for 2007 (or a 88% dividend payout ratio) and $23.3 million for 2006 (or a 53% dividend payout ratio).2007. Dividends declared on preferred stock amounted to $30.1 million in 2009 and $40.3 million in 2008 2007 and 2006.2007.
     On July 30, 2009, the Corporation announced the suspension of dividends on common and all its outstanding series of preferred stock, including the TARP preferred dividends. This suspension was effective with the dividends for the month of August 2009 on the Corporation’s five outstanding series of non-cumulative preferred stock and the dividends for the Corporation’s outstanding Series F Cumulative Preferred Stock and the Corporation’s common stock. The Corporation took this prudent action to preserve capital, as the duration and depth of recessionary economic conditions is uncertain, and consistent with federal regulatory guidance.
     As of December 31, 2008,2009, First BanCorp and FirstBank Puerto Rico and FirstBank Florida were in compliance with regulatory capital requirements that were applicable to them as a financial holding company and a state non-member bank, and a thrift, respectively (i.e., total capital and Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets of at least 8% and 4%, respectively, and Tier 1 capital to average assets of at least 4%). Set forth below are First BanCorp’s, and FirstBank Puerto Rico’s and FirstBank Florida’s regulatory capital ratios as of December 31, 20082009 and December 31, 2007,2008, based on existing Federal Reserve FDIC and OTSFederal Deposit Insurance Corporation guidelines. Effective July 1, the operations conducted by FirstBank Florida as a separate subsidiary were merged with and into FirstBank Puerto Rico, the Corporation’s main banking

114


subsidiary. As part of the Corporation’s strategic planning it was determined that business synergies would be achieved by merging FirstBank Florida with and into FirstBank Puerto Rico. This reorganization included the consolidation of FirstBank Puerto Rico’s loan production office with the former thrift banking operations of FirstBank Florida. For the last three years prior to July 1, the Corporation conducted dual banking operations in the Florida market. The consolidation of the former thrift banking operations with the loan production office resulted in FirstBank Puerto Rico having a more diversified and efficient banking operation in the form of a branch network in the Florida market. The merger allows the Florida operations to benefit by leveraging the capital position of FirstBank Puerto Rico and thereby provide them with the support necessary to grow in the Florida market.
                            
 Banking Subsidiaries Banking Subsidiary
 First FirstBank To be well First To be well
 BanCorp FirstBank capitalized
As of December 31, 2009      
Total capital (Total capital to risk-weighted assets)  13.44%  12.87%  10.00%
Tier 1 capital ratio (Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets)  12.16%  11.70%  6.00%
Leverage ratio  8.91%  8.53%  5.00%
 BanCorp FirstBank Florida capitalized 
As of December 31, 2008
  
  
Total capital (Total capital to risk-weighted assets)  12.80%  12.23%  13.53%  10.00%  12.80%  12.23%  10.00%
Tier 1 capital ratio (Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets)  11.55%  10.98%  12.43%  6.00%  11.55%  10.98%  6.00%
Leverage ratio (1)  8.30%  7.90%  8.78%  5.00%
 
As of December 31, 2007
 
 
Total capital (Total capital to risk-weighted assets)  13.86%  13.23%  10.92%  10.00%
Tier 1 capital ratio (Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets)  12.61%  11.98%  10.42%  6.00%
Leverage ratio (1)  9.29%  8.85%  7.79%  5.00%
Leverage ratio  8.30%  7.90%  5.00%
(1)Tier 1 capital to average assets for First BanCorp and FirstBank and Tier 1 Capital to adjusted total assets
for FirstBank Florida.
     The decreaseincrease in regulatory capital ratios is mainly related to the increase$400 million investment by the U.S. Treasury in preferred stock of the Corporation through the U.S. Treasury TARP Capital Purchase Program. Refer to Note 23 in the volumeCorporation’s financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2009 included in Item 8 of risk-weighted assets driven bythis Form 10-K for additional information regarding this issuance. The funds were used in part to strengthen the aforementioned purchases of MBSCorporation’s lending programs and a higher commercialability to support growth strategies that are centered on customers’ needs, including programs to preserve home ownership. Together with private and consumer loan portfolio.public sector initiatives, the Corporation looks to support the local economy and the communities it serves during the current economic environment.
     The Corporation is well capitalized and positioned to manage economic downturns. Thewell-capitalized, having sound margins over minimum well-capitalized regulatory requirements. As of December 31, 2009, the total regulatory capital ratio of 12.8%is 13.4% and the Tier 1 capital ratio of 11.6% as of December 31, 2008is 12.2%. This translates intoto approximately $386$492 million and $764$881 million of total capital and Tier 1 capital, respectively, in excess of the total capital and Tier 1 capital well capitalized requirements of 10% and 6%, respectively. A key priority for the Corporation is to maintain a sound capital position to absorb any potential future credit losses due to the distressed economic environment and to provide business expansion opportunities.
     The Corporation’s tangible common equity ratio was 3.20% as of December 31, 2009, compared to 4.87% as of December 31, 2008, and the Tier 1 common equity to risk-weighted assets ratio as of December 31, 2009 was 4.10% compared to 5.92% as of December 31, 2008.
     The tangible common equity ratio and tangible book value per common share are non-GAAP measures generally used by financial analysts and investment bankers to evaluate capital adequacy. Tangible common equity is total equity less preferred equity, goodwill and core deposit intangibles. Tangible Assets are total assets less goodwill and core deposit intangibles. Management and many stock analysts use the tangible common equity ratio and tangible book value per common share in conjunction with more traditional bank capital ratios to compare the capital adequacy of banking organizations with significant amounts of goodwill or other intangible assets, typically stemming from the use of the purchase accounting method for mergers and acquisitions. Neither tangible common equity nor tangible assets or related measures should be considered in isolation or as a substitute for stockholders’ equity, total assets or any other measure calculated in accordance with GAAP. Moreover, the manner in which the Corporation calculates its tangible common equity, tangible assets and any other related measures may differ from that of other companies reporting measures with similar names. The following table is a reconciliation of the Corporation’s tangible common equity and tangible assets for the years ended December 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively.

102115


         
  December 31,  December 31, 
(In thousands) 2009  2008 
Total equity — GAAP $1,599,063  $1,548,117 
Preferred equity  (928,508)  (550,100)
Goodwill  (28,098)  (28,098)
Core deposit intangible  (16,600)  (23,985)
       
         
Tangible common equity
 $625,857  $945,934 
       
         
Total assets — GAAP $19,628,448  $19,491,268 
Goodwill  (28,098)  (28,098)
Core deposit intangible  (16,600)  (23,985)
       
         
Tangible assets
 $19,583,750  $19,439,185 
       
Common shares outstanding
  92,542   92,546 
       
         
Tangible common equity ratio
  3.20%  4.87%
Tangible book value per common share
 $6.76  $10.22 
     The Tier 1 common equity to risk-weighted assets ratio is calculated by dividing (a) tier 1 capital less non-common elements including qualifying perpetual preferred stock and qualifying trust preferred securities, by (b) risk-weighted assets, which assets are calculated in accordance with applicable bank regulatory requirements. The Tier 1 common equity ratio is not required by GAAP or on a recurring basis by applicable bank regulatory requirements. However, this ratio was used by the Federal Reserve in connection with its stress test administered to the 19 largest U.S. bank holding companies under the Supervisory Capital Assessment Program (“SCAP”), the results of which were announced on May 7, 2009. Management is currently monitoring this ratio, along with the other ratios set forth in the table above, in evaluating the Corporation’s capital levels.
     The following table reconciles stockholders’ equity (GAAP) to Tier 1 common equity:
         
  December 31,  December 31, 
(In thousands) 2009  2008 
Total equity — GAAP $1,599,063  $1,548,117 
Qualifying preferred stock  (928,508)  (550,100)
Unrealized gain on available-for-sale securities (1)  (26,617)  (57,389)
Disallowed deferred tax asset (2)  (11,827)  (69,810)
Goodwill  (28,098)  (28,098)
Core deposit intangible  (16,600)  (23,985)
Cumulative change gain in fair value of liabilities acounted for under a fair value option  (1,535)  (3,473)
Other disallowed assets  (24)  (508)
       
Tier 1 common equity
 $585,854  $814,754 
       
         
Total risk-weighted assets
 $14,303,496  $13,762,378 
       
         
Tier 1 common equity to risk-weighted assets ratio
  4.10%  5.92%
1-Tier 1 capital excludes net unrealized gains (losses) on available-for-sale debt securities and net unrealized gains on available-for-sale equity securities with readily determinable fair values, in accordance with regulatory risk-based capital guidelines. In arriving at Tier 1 capital, institutions are required to deduct net unrealized losses on available-for-sale equity securities with readily determinable fair values, net of tax.
2-Approximately $111 million of the Corporation’s deferred tax assets at December 31, 2009 (December 31, 2008 — $58 million) were included without limitation in regulatory capital pursuant to the risk-based capital guidelines, while approximately $12 million of such assets at December 31, 2009 (December 31, 2008 — $70 million) exceeded the limitation imposed by these guidelines and, as “disallowed deferred tax assets,” were deducted in arriving at Tier 1 capital. According to regulatory capital guidelines, the deferred tax assets that are dependent upon future taxable income are limited for inclusion in Tier 1 capital to the lesser of: (i) the amount of such deferred tax asset that the entity expects to realize within one year of the calendar quarter end-date, based on its projected future taxable income for that year or (ii) 10% of the amount of the entity’s Tier 1 capital. Approximately $4 million of the Corporation’s other net deferred tax liability at December 31, 2009 (December 31, 2008 — $0) represented primarily the deferred tax effects of unrealized gains and losses on available-for-sale debt securities, which are permitted to be excluded prior to deriving the amount of net deferred tax assets subject to limitation under the guidelines.

116


     TheOn February 1, 2010, the Corporation recently announced, similar to a number of the largest and well-capitalized banks in the United States,reported that it is participating in the U.S. Treasury Department’s Capital Purchase Program (“CPP”). Early in 2009, the Corporation completed the sale of 400,000planning to conduct an exchange offer under which it will be offering to exchange newly issued shares of newlycommon stock for the issued preferred stock valued at $400 million and a warrant to purchase up to 5,842,259outstanding shares of the Corporation’s common stock at an exercise price of $10.27 per share,publicly held Series A through E Noncumulative Perpetual Monthly Income Preferred Stock, subject to the standard terms and conditions for all participants in the CPP. Including thisany necessary proration. The exchange offer will be conducted to improve its capital raise, the Corporation’s total regulatory capital ratio would have been close to 15.7% as of December 31, 2008, or approximately $785 million in excess of the well-capitalized requirement, and the Tier 1 capital ratio would have been close to 14.5% or approximately $1.1 billion in excess of the well-capitalized requirement. The Corporation will use this excess capital to further strengthen its ability to support growth strategies that are centered on the needs of its customers and, together with private and public sector initiatives, support the local economy and the communities it serves duringstructure given the current economic conditions in the markets in which it operates and the evolving regulatory environment. ReferThrough the exchange offer, First BanCorp seeks to Item 5improve its tangible and Tier 1 common equity ratios. The Corporation expects to file a registration statement for the exchange offer shortly after the filing of this Form 10-K for additional information regarding this issuance.fiscal year 2009. Completion of the exchange offer will be subject to certain conditions, including the consent by common stockholders of the issuance of shares of the common stock pursuant to the exchange.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
     In the ordinary course of business, the Corporation engages in financial transactions that are not recorded on the balance sheet, or may be recorded on the balance sheet in amounts that are different than the full contract or notional amount of the transaction. These transactions are designed to (1) meet the financial needs of customers, (2) manage the Corporation’s credit, market or liquidity risks, (3) diversify the Corporation’s funding sources and (4) optimize capital.
     As a provider of financial services, the Corporation routinely enters into commitments with off-balance sheet risk to meet the financial needs of its customers. These financial instruments may include loan commitments and standby letters of credit. These commitments are subject to the same credit policies and approval process used for on-balance sheet instruments. These instruments involve, to varying degrees, elements of credit and interest rate risk in excess of the amount recognized in the statement of financial position. As of December 31, 2008,2009, commitments to extend credit and commercial and financial standby letters of credit amounted to approximately $1.5 billion and $102.2$103.9 million, respectively. Commitments to extend credit are agreements to lend to customers as long as the conditions established in the contract are met. Generally, the Corporation’s mortgage banking activities do not enter into interest rate lock agreements with its prospective borrowers.

103117


Contractual Obligations and Commitments
     The following table presents a detail of the maturities of the Corporation’s contractual obligations and commitments, which consist of CDs, long-term contractual debt obligations, operating leases, other contractual obligations, commitments to sell mortgage loans and commitments to extend credit:
                                        
 Contractual Obligations and Commitments  Contractual Obligations and Commitments   
 As of December 31, 2008  As of December 31, 2009   
 Total Less than 1 year 1-3 years 3-5 years After 5 years  Total Less than 1 year 1-3 years 3-5 years After 5 years 
 (In thousands)  (In thousands) 
Contractual obligations (1): 
Contractual obligations: 
Certificates of deposit (2)(1) $10,416,592 $5,765,792 $2,937,391 $624,837 $1,088,572  $9,212,283 $6,041,065 $2,835,562 $321,850 $13,806 
Loans payable 900,000 900,000    
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase 3,421,042 533,542 1,287,500 900,000 700,000  3,076,631 676,631 1,600,000 800,000  
Advances from FHLB 1,060,440 382,000 411,000 267,440   978,440 325,000 445,000 208,440  
Notes payable 23,274  6,888 6,245 10,141  27,117  13,756  13,361 
Other borrowings 231,914    231,914  231,959    231,959 
Operating leases 51,415 7,669 10,946 7,473 25,327  63,795 10,342 14,362 8,878 30,213 
Other contractual obligations 42,461 22,557 16,879 3,025   10,387 7,157 3,130 100  
                      
Total contractual obligations $15,247,138 $6,711,560 $4,670,604 $1,809,020 $2,055,954  $14,500,612 $7,960,195 $4,911,810 $1,339,268 $289,339 
                      
Commitments to sell mortgage loans $50,500 $50,500  $13,158 $13,158 
          
Standby letters of credit $102,178 $102,178  $103,904 $103,904 
          
Commitments to extend credit:  
Lines of credit $914,374 $914,374  $1,220,317 $1,220,317 
Letters of credit 33,632 33,632  48,944 48,944 
Commitments to originate loans 518,281 518,281  255,598 255,598 
          
Total commercial commitments $1,466,287 $1,466,287  $1,524,859 $1,524,859 
          
 
(1) $22.4 million of tax liability, including accrued interest of $6.8 million, associated with unrecognized tax benefits under FIN 48 has been excluded due to the high degree of uncertainty regarding the timing of future cash outflows associated with such obligations.
(2)Includes $8.4$7.6 billion of brokered CDs generally sold by third-party intermediaries in denominations of $100,000 or less, within FDIC insurance limits.limits and $25.6 million in CDARS.
     The Corporation has obligations and commitments to make future payments under contracts, such as debt and lease agreements, and under other commitments to sell mortgage loans at fair value and commitments to extend credit. Commitments to extend credit are agreements to lend to a customer as long as there is no violation of any condition established in the contract. Other contractual obligations result mainly from contracts for the rental and maintenance of equipment. Since certain commitments are expected to expire without being drawn upon, the total commitment amount does not necessarily represent future cash requirements. For most of the commercial lines of credit, the Corporation has the option to reevaluate the agreement prior to additional disbursements. There have been no significant or unexpected draws on existing commitments. The funding needs patterns of the customers have not significantly changed as a result of the latest market disruptions. In the case of credit cards and personal lines of credit, the Corporation can at any time and without cause cancel the unused credit facility.
     Lehman Brothers Special Financing, Inc. (“Lehman”) was the counterparty to the Corporation on certain interest rate swap agreements. During the third quarter of 2008, Lehman failed to pay the scheduled net cash settlement due to the Corporation, which constitutes an event of default under those interest rate swap agreements. The Corporation terminated all interest rate swaps with Lehman and replaced them with other counterparties under similar terms and conditions. In connection with the unpaid net cash settlement due as of December 31, 2009 under the swap agreements, the Corporation has an unsecured counterparty exposure with Lehman, which filed for bankruptcy on October 3, 2008, of approximately $1.4 million. This exposure was reversed in the third quarter of 2008. The Corporation had pledged collateral of $63.6 million with Lehman to guarantee its performance under the swap agreements in the event payment thereunder was required. The book value of pledged securities with Lehman as of December 31, 2009 amounted to approximately $64.5 million.
     The Corporation believes that the securities pledged as collateral should not be part of the Lehman bankruptcy estate given the fact that the posted collateral constituted a performance guarantee under the swap agreements, was not part of a financing agreement, and ownership of the securities was never transferred to Lehman. Upon termination of the interest rate swap agreements, Lehman’s obligation was to return the collateral to the Corporation. During the fourth quarter of 2009, the Corporation discovered that Lehman Brothers, Inc., acting as agent of Lehman, had deposited the securities in a custodial account at JP Morgan/Chase, and that, shortly before the filing of

118


the Lehman bankruptcy proceedings, it had provided instructions to have most of the securities transferred to Barclay’s Capital in New York. After Barclay’s refusal to turn over the securities, the Corporation, during the month of December 2009, filed a lawsuit against Barclay’s Capital in federal court in New York demanding the return of the securities. While the Corporation believes it has valid reasons to support its claim for the return of the securities, there are no assurances that it will ultimately succeed in its litigation against Barclay’s Capital to recover all or a substantial portion of the securities.
Additionally, the Corporation continues to pursue its claim filed in January 2009 in the proceedings under the Securities Protection Act with regard to Lehman Brothers Incorporated in Bankruptcy Court, Southern District of New York. The Corporation can provide no assurances that it will be successful in recovering all or substantial portion of the securities through these proceedings. An estimated loss was not accrued as the Corporation is unable to determine the timing of the claim resolution or whether it will succeed in recovering all or a substantial portion of the collateral or its equivalent value. If additional negative relevant facts become available in future periods, a need to recognize a partial or full reserve of this claim may arise. Considering that the investment securities have not yet been recovered by the Corporation, despite its efforts in this regard, the Corporation decided to classify such investments as non-performing during the second quarter of 2009.
Interest Rate Risk Management
     First BanCorp manages its asset/liability position in order to limit the effects of changes in interest rates on net interest income and to maintain stability in the profitability under varying interest rate environments. The MIALCO oversees interest rate risk and meetings focusfocuses on, among other things, current and expected conditions in world financial markets, competition and prevailing rates in the local deposit market, liquidity, unrealized gains and losses in securities market values, recent or proposed changes to the investment portfolio, alternative funding sources and theirrelated costs, hedging and the possible purchase of derivatives such as swaps and caps, and any tax or regulatory issues which may be pertinent to these areas. The MIALCO approves funding decisions in light of the Corporation’s overall growth strategies and objectives.

104


     The Corporation performs on a quarterly basis a consolidated net interest income simulation analysis on a consolidated basis to estimate the potential change in future earnings from projected changes in interest rates. These simulations are carried out over a one-year and a five-yearone-to-five-year time horizon, assuming gradual upward and downward interest rate movements of 200 basis points, achieved during a twelve-month period. Simulations are carried out in two ways:
(1)using a static balance sheet as the Corporation had on the simulation date, and
(2)using a growing          (1) using a static balance sheet as the Corporation had it on the simulation date, and
          (2) using a dynamic balance sheet based on recent growth patterns and current strategies.
     The balance sheet is divided into groups of assets and liabilities detailed by maturity or re-pricing structure and their corresponding interest yields and costs. As interest rates rise or fall, these simulations incorporate expected future lending rates, current and expected future funding sources and costs, the possible exercise of options, changes in prepayment rates, deposits decay and other factors which may be important in projecting the future growth of net interest income.
     The Corporation uses a simulation model to project future movements in the Corporation’s balance sheet and income statement. The starting point of the projections generally corresponds to the actual values ofon the balance sheet on the date of the simulations. For the December 31, 2007 simulation and based on the significant downward shift in rates experienced at the beginning of 2008, the Corporation’s MIALCO decided to update the rates as of the end of January 2008 and use these as the starting point for the projections.
     These simulations are highly complex, and use many simplifying assumptions that are intended to reflect the general behavior of the Corporation over the period in question. There can be no assuranceIt is highly unlikely that actual events will match these assumptions in all cases. For this reason, the results of these simulations are only approximations of the true sensitivity of net interest income to changes in market interest rates.

119


     The following table presents the results of the simulations as of December 31, 20082009 and 2007.2008. Consistent with prior years, these exclude non-cash changes in the fair value of derivatives and SFAS 159 liabilities:liabilities measured at fair value:
                                  
 December 31, 2008 December 31, 2007 December 31, 2009 December 31, 2008
 Net Interest Income Risk (Projected for the next 12 months) Net Interest Income Risk (Projected for the next 12 months) Net Interest Income Risk (Projected for the next 12 months) Net Interest Income Risk (Projected for the next 12 months)
 Static Simulation Growing Balance Sheet Static Simulation Growing Balance Sheet Static Simulation Growing Balance Sheet Static Simulation Growing Balance Sheet
(Dollars in millions)
 $ Change % Change $ Change % Change $ Change % Change $ Change % Change $ Change % Change $ Change % Change $ Change % Change $ Change % Change
+200 bps ramp $6.5  1.39% $6.4  1.29% $(8.1)  (1.64)% $(8.4)  (1.66)% $10.6  2.16% $16.0  3.39% $6.5  1.39% $6.4  1.29%
-200 bps ramp $(12.8)  (2.77)% $(15.5)  (3.15)% $(13.2)  (2.68)% $(13.2)  (2.60)% $(31.9)  (6.53)% $(33.0)  (6.98)% $(12.8)  (2.77)% $(15.5)  (3.15)%
     TheDuring the past year, the Corporation has pursued during 2008continued managing its balance sheet structure to control the overall interest rate risk. As part of the strategy, the Corporation reduced long-term fixed-rate and callable investment securities and increased shorter-duration investment securities. During 2009, MBS prepayments accelerated significantly as a result of reducing the low interest rate risk exposureenvironment. Approximately $1.7 billion of Agency MBS were sold during 2009, and $945 million of US Agency debentures were called during 2009. Partial proceeds from these sales and calls, in the re-pricing structure gaps between the assetsconjunction with prepayments on mortgage backed securities were re-invested in instruments with shorter durations such as 15-Years US Agency MBS, US Agency callable debentures with contractual maturities ranging from two to three years, and liabilities and to maintain interestUS Agency floating rate risk within the established policy target levels. Interest rate risk, as measured by the sensitivity of net interest income to shifts in rates, changed when compared to December 31, 2007.collateral mortgage obligations. In order to reduce the exposure to high levels of market volatility,addition, during 2008,2009, the Corporation has been extendingcontinued adjusting the maturitymix of its funding sources by, among other things, entering into long-term repurchase agreements and issuing brokered CDs with longer terms. Also,to better match the Corporation increased the loan portfolio by approximately $1.3 billion since December 31, 2007, the increase was mainly driven by commercial loans tied to short-term LIBOR repricing and 30 years fixed-rate mortgage loans.
     During the first 12 monthsexpected average life of the income simulation, under a parallel falling rates scenario, net interest income is expected to compress. The Corporation’s loan and investment portfolio is subject to prepayment risk, which results from the ability of a third party to repay their debt obligations prior to maturity. In a declining rate scenario, the prepayment risk in the Corporation’s U.S. government agency fixed-rate MBS portfolio is expected to increase substantially, combined with the callable feature of the U.S. agency debentures that would shorten the duration of the assets with the potential of triggering the call options; which could lead to reinvestment of proceeds from called securities in lower yielding assets. Due to current market conditions and the drop in the long end of the yield curve during 2008, the probability of exercise of the embedded calls on approximately $945 million of U.S. Agency debentures has increased and is expected to be effective in both, the base and falling rates scenarios; this, despite the fact that the lack of liquidity in the financial markets has caused several call dates go by during 2008 without the embedded calls being exercised.

105


     Taking into consideration the aforementionedabove-mentioned facts for modeling purposes, the purposenet interest income for the next twelve months under a growing balance sheet scenario is estimated to increase by $16.0 million in a gradual parallel upward move of 200 basis points.
     Following the Corporation’s risk management policies, modeling of the downward “parallel” rates moves by anchoring the short end of the curve, (falling rates with a flattening curve) was performed, even though, given the current level of rates as of December 31, 2009, some market interest rates were projected to be zero. Under this scenario, where a considerable spread compression is projected, net interest income for the next twelve months in a growing balance sheet scenario is estimated to decrease by $15.5 million in a parallel downward move of 200 basis points, and the change for the same period, is an increase of $6.4 million in a parallel upward move of 200 basis points. As noted, the impact of the callability feature in the Agency Securities combined with the prepayment risk of the loan and investment portfolio, and the re-investment of those securities into lower yielding assets could result in a shift in the Corporation’s interest rate risk exposure from being in a liability sensitive position to an asset sensitive position for the first twelve months of the simulation horizon. Assuming parallel shifts in interest rates, the Corporation’s net interest income would continue to increase in rising rate scenarios and reduce in falling rate scenarios over a five-year modeling horizon.$33.0 million.
     The Corporation used the gap analysis tool to evaluate the potential effect of rate shocks on net interest income over the selected time periods.time-periods. The gap report as of December 31, 20082009 showed a positive cumulative gap for 3 month of $2.1$2.3 billion and a positive cumulative gap of $1.4 billion$254.8 million for 1 year, compared to negativepositive cumulative gaps of $2.3$2.1 billion and $1.6$1.4 billion for 3 months and 1 year, respectively, as of December 31, 2007.2008. Gap management is a dynamic process, through which the Corporation makes constant adjustments to maintain sound and prudent interest rate risk exposures.
Derivatives.First BanCorp uses derivative instruments and other strategies to manage its exposure to interest rate risk caused by changes in interest rates beyond management’s control.
     The following summarizes major strategies, including derivative activities, used by the Corporation in managing interest rate risk:
Interest rate swaps — Interest rate swap agreements generally involve the exchange of fixed and floating-rate interest payment obligations without the exchange of the underlying notional principal. Since a substantial portion of the Corporation’s loans, mainly commercial loans, yield variable rates, the interest rate swaps are utilized to convert fixed-rate brokered CDs (liabilities), mainly those with long-term maturities, to a variable rate and mitigate the interest rate risk inherent in these variable rate loans.
Interest rate cap agreements — Interest rate cap agreements provide the right to receive cash if a reference interest rate rises above a contractual rate. The value increases as the reference interest rate rises. The Corporation enters into interest rate cap agreements to protectfor protection against rising interest rates. Specifically, the interest rate on certain private label mortgage pass-through securities and certain of the Corporation’s commercial loans to other financial institutions is generally a variable rate limited to the weighted-average coupon of the pass-through certificate or referenced residential mortgage collateral, less a contractual servicing fee.
Interest rate swaps — Interest rate swap agreements generally involve the exchange of fixed and floating-rate interest payment obligations without the exchange of the underlying notional principal amount. As of December 31, 2009, most of the interest rate swaps outstanding are used for protection against rising interest rates. In the past, interest rate swaps volume was much higher since they were used to convert fixed-rate brokered CDs

120


(liabilities), mainly those with long-term maturities, to a variable rate and mitigate the interest rate risk inherent in variable rate loans. All outstanding interest rate swaps related to brokered CDs were called during 2009, in the face of lower interest rate levels, and as a consequence the Corporation exercised its call option on the swapped-to-floating brokered CDs.
Structured repurchase agreements — The Corporation uses structured repurchase agreements, with embedded call options, to reduce the Corporation’s exposure to interest rate risk by lengthening the contractual maturities of its liabilities, while keeping funding costs low. Another type of structured repurchase agreement includes repurchased agreements with embedded cap corridors; these instruments also provide protection for a rising rate scenario.
     For detailed information regarding the volume of derivative activities (e.g. notional amounts), location and fair values of derivative instruments in the Statement of Financial Condition and the amount of gains and losses reported in the Statement of (Loss) Income, refer to Note 3032 in the Corporation’s audited financial statements for the year ended December 31, 20082009 included in Item 8 of this Form 10-K.

106


     The following tables summarize the fair value changes onof the Corporation’s derivatives as well as the source of the fair values:
Fair Value Change
    
     Year ended 
(In thousands) December 31, 2008  December 31, 2009 
   
Fair value of contracts outstanding at the beginning of year $(52,451) $(495)
Fair value of new contracts at inception  (3,255)  (35)
Contracts terminated or called during the year 37,235   (5,198)
Changes in fair value during the year 17,976  5,197 
      
Fair value of contracts outstanding as of December 31, 2008 $(495)
Fair value of contracts outstanding as of December 31, 2009 $(531)
      
Source of Fair Value
                    
 Payments Due by Period                     
 Maturity Maturity    Payments Due by Period 
 Less Than Maturity Maturity In Excess Total  Maturity Maturity   
(In thousands) One Year 1-3 Years 3-5 Years of 5 Years Fair Value  Less Than Maturity Maturity In Excess Total 
As of December 31, 2008
 
 
As of December 31, 2009 One Year 1-3 Years 3-5 Years of 5 Years Fair Value 
Pricing from observable market inputs $ $(1,008) $(577) $330 $(1,255) $(461) $18 $(636) $(3,651) $(4,730)
Pricing that consider unobservable market inputs    760 760     4,199 4,199 
                      
 $ $(1,008) $(577) $1,090 $(495) $(461) $18 $(636) $548 $(531)
                      
     Derivative instruments, such as interest rate swaps, are subject to market risk. The Corporation’s derivatives are mainly composed of interest rate swaps that are used to convert the fixed interest payment on its brokered CDs and medium-term notes to variable payments (receive fixed/pay floating). As is the case with investment securities, the market value of derivative instruments is largely a function of the financial market’s expectations regarding the future direction of interest rates. Accordingly, current market values are not necessarily indicative of the future impact of derivative instruments on earnings. This will depend, for the most part, on the shape of the yield curve as well as the level of interest rates.
     Effective January 1, 2007, the Corporation decided to early adopt SFAS 159 for its callable brokered CDs and certain fixed medium-term notes that were hedged with interest rate swaps. One of the main considerations to early adopt SFAS 159 for these instruments was to eliminate the operational procedures required by the long-haul method of accounting in terms of documentation, effectiveness assessment, and manual procedures followed by the Corporation to fulfill the requirements specified by SFAS 133. As of December 31, 2009 and 2008, all of the derivative instruments held by the Corporation were considered economic undesignated hedges.
     During 2008, approximately $3.02009, all of the $1.1 billion of interest rate swaps that economically hedge brokered CDs that were outstanding as of December 31, 2008 were called by the counterparties, mainly due to the decreaselower levels of 3-month LIBOR. Following the cancellation of the interest rate swaps, the Corporation exercised its call option on the approximately $2.9$1.1 billion swapped-to-floatingswapped-to- floating brokered CDs. The Corporation recorded a net unrealized gainloss of $4.1$3.5 million as a result of these transactions resulting from the reversal of the cumulative mark-to-market valuation of the swaps and the brokered CDs called.
     Refer to Note 2729 of the Corporation’s audited financial statements for the year ended December 31, 20082009 included in Item 8 of this Form 10-K for additional information regarding the fair value determination of derivative instruments.

107121


     The use of derivatives involves market and credit risk. The market risk of derivatives stems principally from the potential for changes in the value of derivative contracts based on changes in interest rates. The credit risk of derivatives arises from the potential of default from the counterparty. To manage this credit risk, the Corporation deals with counterparties of good credit standing, enters into master netting agreements whenever possible and, when appropriate, obtains collateral. Master netting agreements incorporate rights of set-off that provide for the net settlement of contracts with the same counterparty in the event of default. Currently the Corporation is mostly engaged in derivative instruments with counterparties with a credit rating of single A or better. All of the Corporation’s interest rate swaps are supported by securities collateral agreements, which allow the delivery of securities to and from the counterparties depending on the fair value of the instruments, to minimize credit risk.
     Set forth below is a detailed analysis of the Corporation’s credit exposure by counterparty with respect to derivative instruments outstanding as of December 31, 20082009 and 2007.December 31, 2008.
                                              
 As of December 31, 2008 
(In thousands) As of December 31, 2009 
 Total Accrued  Total Accrued 
 Exposure at Negative Total interest receivable  Exposure at Negative Total interest receivable 
Counterparty Rating(1) Notional Fair Value(2) Fair Values Fair Value (payable)  Rating(1) Notional Fair Value(2) Fair Values Fair Value (payable) 
Interest rate swaps with rated counterparties:                       
Wachovia AA $16,570 $41 $ $41 $108 
Merrill Lynch A+ 230,190 1,366  1,366  (106)
UBS Financial Services, Inc. A+ 14,384 88  88 179 
JP Morgan A+ 531,886 2,319  (5,726)  (3,407) 1,094  A+ $67,345  $621  $(4,304) $(3,683) $ 
Credit Suisse First Boston A+ 151,884 178  (1,461)  (1,283) 512  A+  49,311   2   (764)  (762)   
Citigroup A 295,130 1,516  (1) 1,515 2,299 
Goldman Sachs A 16,165 597  597 158  A  6,515   557      557    
Morgan Stanley A 107,450 735  735 59  A  109,712   238      238    
                            
 1,363,659 6,840  (7,188)  (348) 4,303     232,883   1,418   (5,068)  (3,650)   
                       
Other derivatives (3) 332,634 1,170  (1,317)  (147)  (203)    284,619   4,518   (1,399)  3,119   (269)
                            
Total $1,696,293 $8,010 $(8,505) $(495) $4,100    $517,502  $5,936  $(6,467) $(531) $(269)
                            
                                              
 As of December 31, 2007 
(In thousands) As of December 31, 2008 
 Total Accrued  Total Accrued 
 Exposure at Negative Total interest receivable  Exposure at Negative Total interest receivable 
Counterparty Rating(1) Notional Fair Value(2) Fair Values Fair Value (payable)  Rating(1) Notional Fair Value(2) Fair Values Fair Value (payable) 
Interest rate swaps with rated counterparties:                       
Wachovia AA- $16,570  $41  $  $41  $108 
Merrill Lynch A  230,190   1,366      1,366   (106)
UBS Financial Services, Inc. A+  14,384   88      88   179 
JP Morgan AA- $1,353,290 $18 $(19,766) $(19,748) $3,334  A+  531,886   2,319   (5,726)  (3,407)  1,094 
Wachovia AA- 23,655   (365)  (365) 144 
Credit Suisse First Boston A+  151,884   178   (1,461)  (1,283)  512 
Citigroup A+  295,130   1,516   (1)  1,515   2,299 
Goldman Sachs A  16,165   597      597   158 
Morgan Stanley AA- 193,170 4,737  (2,591) 2,146 264  A  107,450   735      735   59 
Goldman Sachs AA- 45,490 2,297  (398) 1,899 257 
Citigroup AA- 795,971 5  (9,042)  (9,037) 2,693 
UBS Financial Services, Inc. AA 90,016   (928)  (928) 245 
Lehman Brothers A+ 1,077,045 5  (14,768)  (14,763) 2,748 
Credit Suisse First Boston A+ 183,393 36  (1,785)  (1,749) 12 
Merrill Lynch A+ 577,088 10  (7,503)  (7,493)  (1,488)
Bank of Montreal A+ 9,825   (36)  (36) 45 
Bear Stearns A 74,400 2,305  (875) 1,430 79 
                            
 4,423,343 9,413  (58,057)  (48,644) 8,333     1,363,659   6,840   (7,188)  (348)  4,303 
                       
Other derivatives(3)
 351,217 5,288  (9,095)  (3,807) 431     332,634   1,170   (1,317)  (147)  (203)
                            
Total $4,774,560 $14,701 $(67,152) $(52,451) $8,764    $1,696,293  $8,010  $(8,505) $(495) $4,100 
                            
 
(1) Based on the S&P and Fitch Long Term Issuer Credit Ratings.
 
(2) For each counterparty, this amount includes derivatives with positive fair value excluding the related accrued interest receivable/payable.
 
(3) Credit exposure with several local companiesPuerto Rico counterparties for which a credit rating is not readily available.
Approximately $0.8$4.2 million and $5.1$0.8 million of the credit exposure with local companies relates to caps referenced to mortgages bought from R&G Premier Bank as of December 31, 20082009 and 2007,2008, respectively.
     Lehman Brothers Special Financing, Inc. (“Lehman”) was the counterparty to the Corporation on certain interest rate swap agreements. During the third quarter of 2008, Lehman failed to pay the scheduled net cash settlement due to the Corporation, which constitutes an event of default under these interest rate swap agreements. The Corporation terminated all interest rate swaps with Lehman and replaced them with another counterparty under similar terms and

108122


conditions. In connection with     A “Hull-White Interest Rate Tree” approach is used to value the unpaid netoption components of derivative instruments. The discounting of the cash settlement dueflows is performed using US dollar LIBOR-based discount rates or yield curves that account for the industry sector and the credit rating of the counterparty and/or the Corporation. Although most of the derivative instruments are fully collateralized, a credit spread is considered for those that are not secured in full. The cumulative mark-to-market effect of credit risk in the valuation of derivative instruments resulted in an unrealized gain of approximately $0.5 million as of December 31, 2009, of which an unrealized loss of $1.9 million was recorded in 2009, an unrealized gain of $1.5 million was recorded in 2008 under the swap agreements, the Corporation hasand an unsecured counterparty exposure with Lehman, which filed for bankruptcy on October 3, 2008,unrealized gain of approximately $1.4 million. This exposure has been reserved as of December 31, 2008.$0.9 million was recorded in 2007. The Corporation had pledged collateralcompares the valuations obtained with Lehman to guarantee its performance under the swap agreements in the event payment thereunder was required. The market value of pledged securities with Lehmanvaluations received from counterparties, as of December 31, 2008 amounted to approximately $62 million. The position of the Corporation with respect to the recovery of the collateral, after discussion with its outside legal counsel, is that at all times title to the collateral has been vested in the Corporation and that, therefore, this collateral should not, for any purpose, be considered property of the bankruptcy estate available for distribution among Lehman’s creditors. On January 30, 2009, the Corporation filed a customer claim with the trustee and at this time the Corporation is unable to determine the timing of the claim resolution or whether it will succeed in recovering all or a substantial portion of the collateral or its equivalent value. As additional relevant facts become available in future periods, a need to recognize a partial or full reserve of this claim may arise.an internal control procedure.
Credit Risk Management
     First BanCorp is subject to credit risk mainly with respect to its portfolio of loans receivable and off-balance sheet instruments, mainly derivatives and loan commitments. Loans receivable represents loans that First BanCorp holds for investment and, therefore, First BanCorp is at risk for the term of the loan. Loan commitments represent commitments to extend credit, subject to specific conditions,condition, for specific amounts and maturities. These commitments may expose the Corporation to credit risk and are subject to the same review and approval process as for loans. Refer to “Contractual Obligations and Commitments” above for further details. The credit risk of derivatives arises from the potential of the counterparty’s default on its contractual obligations. To manage this credit risk, the Corporation deals with counterparties of good credit standing, enters into master netting agreements whenever possible and, when appropriate, obtains collateral. For further details and information on the Corporation’s derivative credit risk exposure, refer to “—Interest Rate Risk Management” section above. The Corporation manages its credit risk through fundamental portfolio risk management principles including credit policy, underwriting, independent loan review and quality control procedures, comprehensive financial analysis, and an established delinquency committee.management committees. The Corporation also employs proactive collection and loss mitigation efforts. Also,Furthermore, there are Loan Workoutstructured loan workout functions responsible for avoiding defaults and minimizing losses upon default of commercialfor each region and construction loans.for each business segment. The group utilizes relationship officers, collection specialists and attorneys. In the case of residential construction projects, the workout function monitors project specifics, such as project management and marketing, as deemed necessary.
     The Corporation may also have risk of default in the securities portfolio. The securities held by the Corporation are principally fixed-rate mortgage-backed securities and U.S. Treasury and agency securities. Thus, a substantial portion of these instruments is backed by mortgages, a guarantee of a U.S. government-sponsored entity or backed by the full faith and credit of the U.S. government and is deemed to be of the highest credit quality.
     Management’s Credit Committee,Management, comprised of the Corporation’s Chief Credit Risk Officer, Chief Lending Officer and other senior executives, has the primary responsibility for setting strategies to achieve the Corporation’s credit risk goals and objectives. TheseThose goals and objectives are documented in the Corporation’s Credit Policy.
Allowance for Loan and Lease Losses and Non-performing Assets
     Allowance for Loan and Lease Losses
The provision for loan and lease losses is charged to earnings to maintain the allowance for loan and lease losses at arepresents the estimate of the level that the Corporation considers adequateof reserves appropriate to absorb probable losses inherent in the portfolio. Management allocates specific portionscredit losses. The amount of the allowance forwas determined by judgments regarding the quality of each individual loan portfolio. All known relevant internal and lease losses to problem loansexternal factors that are identified through an asset classification analysis. The adequacyaffected loan collectibility were considered, including analyses of the allowance forhistorical charge-off experience, migration patterns, changes in economic conditions, and changes in loan and lease losses is based upon a number of factors including historical loan and lease loss experience that may not fully represent current conditions inherent in the portfolio.collateral values. For example, factors affecting the Puerto Rico, Florida (USA), US Virgin Islands’ or British Virgin Islands’ economies may contribute to delinquencies and defaults above the Corporation’s historical loan and lease losses. The Corporation addresses this risk by actively monitoringSuch factors are subject to regular review and may change to reflect updated performance trends and expectations, particularly in times of severe stress such as was experienced throughout 2009. We believe the delinquencyprocess for determining the allowance considers all of the potential factors that could result in credit losses. However, the process includes judgmental and default experience and by considering current economic and market conditions and their probable impact on the borrowers. Based on the assessment of current conditions, the Corporation makes appropriate adjustmentsquantitative elements that may be subject to the historically developed assumptions when necessary to adjust historical factors to account for present conditions. The Corporation also takes into consideration information about trends on non-accrual loans, delinquencies, changes in underwriting policies, and other risk characteristics relevant to the particular loan category and delinquencies. Although management believessignificant change. There is no certainty that the allowance for loan and lease losses iswill be adequate factors beyond the Corporation’sover time to cover credit

109123


control, including factorslosses in the portfolio because of continued adverse changes in the economy, market conditions, or events adversely affecting specific customers, industries or markets. To the economiesextent actual outcomes differ from our estimates, the credit quality of Puerto Rico,our customer base materially decreases and the United States (principallyrisk profile of a market, industry, or group of customers changes materially, or if the stateallowance is determined to not be adequate, additional provision for credit losses could be required, which could adversely affect our business, financial condition, liquidity, capital, and results of Florida),operations in future periods. Refer to “Critical Accounting Policies – Allowance for Loan and Lease Losses” section above for additional information about the U.S.VI or British VI may contribute to delinquencies and defaults, thus necessitating additional reserves.
     For small, homogeneous loans, including residential mortgage loans, auto loans, consumer loans, finance lease loans, and commercial and construction loans in amounts under $1.0 million,methodology used by the Corporation evaluates ato determine specific allowance based on average historical loss experience for each corresponding type of loans and market conditions. The methodology of accounting for all probable losses is made in accordance with the guidance provided by SFAS 5, “Accounting for Contingencies.”
     The Corporation measures impairment individually for those commercial and real estate loans with a principal balance of $1 million or more in accordance with the provisions of SFAS 114. A loan is impaired when, based on current information and events, it is probable that the Corporation will be unable to collect all amounts due according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement. A specific reserve is determined for those commercial and real estate loans classified as impaired, primarily based on each such loan’s collateral value (if collateral dependent) or the present value of expected future cash flows discounted at the loan’s effective interest rate. If foreclosure is probable, the creditor is required to measure the impairment based on the fair value of the collateral. The fair value of the collateral is generally obtained from appraisals. Updated appraisals are obtained when the Corporation determines that loans are impaired and for certain loans on a spot basis selected by specific characteristics such as delinquency levels, age of the appraisal, and loan-to-value ratios. Should there be a deficiency, the Corporation records a specific allowance for loan losses related to these loans.
     As a general procedure, the Corporation internally reviews appraisals on a spot basis as part of the underwriting and approval process. For construction loans related to the Miami Corporate Banking operations, appraisals are reviewed by an outsourced contracted appraiser. Once a loan backed by real estate collateral deteriorates or is accounted for in non-accrual status, a full assessment of the value of the collateral is performed. If the Corporation commences litigation to collect an outstanding loan or commences foreclosure proceedings against a borrower (which includes the collateral), a new appraisal report is requestedreserves and the book value is adjusted accordingly, either by a corresponding reserve or a charge-off.
     The Credit Risk area requests new collateral appraisals for impaired collateral dependent loans. In order to determine present market conditions in Puerto Rico and the Virgin Islands, and to gauge property appreciation rates, opinions of value are requested for a sample of delinquent residential real estate loans. Thegeneral valuation information gathered through these appraisals is considered in the Corporation’s allowance model assumptions.allowance.
     Substantially all of the Corporation’s loan portfolio is located within the boundaries of the U.S. economy. Whether the collateral is located in Puerto Rico, the U.S. British Virgin Islands or the U.S. mainland (mainly in the state of Florida), the performance of the Corporation’s loan portfolio and the value of the collateral backingsupporting the transactions are dependent upon the performance of and conditions within each specific area real estate market. Recent economic reports related to the real estate market in Puerto Rico indicate that certain pockets of the real estate market are subject tois experiencing readjustments in value driven by the deteriorated purchasing power of the consumers and general economic conditions. The Corporation is protected by healthysets adequate loan-to-value ratios set upon original approval and driven byfollowing the Corporation’s regulatory and credit policy standards. The real estate market for the U.S. Virgin islands remains fairly stable. In the Florida market, residential real estate has experienced a very slow turnaround.
     As shown in the following table below, the allowance for loan and lease losses increased to $528.1 million at December 31, 2009, compared with $281.5 million at December 31, 2008. Expressed as a percent of period-end total loans receivable, the ratio increased to 3.79% at December 31, 2009, compared with 2.15% at December 31, 2008. The $246.6 million increase in the allowance primarily reflected an increase in specific reserves associated with impaired loans, an increase associated with risk-grade migration and an increase in non-performing loans, predominantly in the commercial and construction portfolio. The increase is also a result of updating the loss rates factors used to determine the general reserve to account for the increase in net charge-offs, non-performing loans and the stressed economic environment. Refer to the “Provision for Loan and Lease Losses” discussion above for additional information.

110124


     The following table sets forth an analysis of the activity in the allowance for loan and lease losses during the periods indicated:
                                        
Year Ended December 31, 2008 2007 2006 2005 2004  2009 2008 2007 2006 2005 
 (Dollars in thousands)  (Dollars in thousands) 
Allowance for loan and lease losses, beginning of year $190,168 $158,296 $147,999 $141,036 $126,378  $281,526 $190,168 $158,296 $147,999 $141,036 
Provision for loan and lease losses 190,948 120,610 74,991 50,644 52,799 
                      
Loans charged-off: 
Residential real estate  (6,256)  (985)  (997)  (945)  (254)
Commercial  (29,575)  (11,260)  (6,036)  (8,558)  (5,848)
Provision (recovery) for loan and lease losses: 
Residential mortgage 45,010 13,032 2,736 4,059 2,759 
Commercial mortgage 71,401 7,740 1,326 3,898 1,133 
Commercial and Industrial 146,157 35,561 18,369  (1,662)  (5,774)
Construction  (7,933)  (3,910)    (342) 264,246 53,109 23,502 5,815 7,546 
Finance leases  (10,583)  (10,393)  (5,721)  (2,748)  (2,894)
Consumer  (62,725)  (68,282)  (64,455)  (39,669)  (34,704)
Recoveries 8,751 6,092 12,515 6,876 5,901 
Consumer and finance leases 53,044 81,506 74,677 62,881 44,980 
           
Total provision for loan and lease losses 579,858 190,948 120,610 74,991 50,644 
           
Charged-off: 
Residential mortgage  (28,934)  (6,256)  (985)  (997)  (945)
Commercial mortgage  (25,871)  (3,664)  (1,333)  (19)  (268)
Commercial and Industrial  (35,696)  (25,911)  (9,927)  (6,017)  (8,290)
Construction  (183,800)  (7,933)  (3,910)   
Consumer and finance leases  (70,121)  (73,308)  (78,675)  (70,176)  (42,417)
           
  (344,422)  (117,072)  (94,830)  (77,209)  (51,920)
           
Recoveries: 
Residential mortgage 73  1 17  
Commercial mortgage 667    4 
Commercial and Industrial 1,188 1,678 659 3,491 1,275 
Construction 200 198 78   
Consumer and finance leases 9,030 6,875 5,354 9,007 5,597 
           
 11,158 8,751 6,092 12,515 6,876 
                      
Net charge-offs  (108,321)  (88,738)  (64,694)  (45,044)  (38,141)  (333,264)  (108,321)  (88,738)  (64,694)  (45,044)
                      
Other adjustments(1)
 8,731   1,363    8,731   1,363 
                      
Allowance for loan and lease losses, end of year $281,526 $190,168 $158,296 $147,999 $141,036  $528,120 $281,526 $190,168 $158,296 $147,999 
                      
Allowance for loan and lease losses to year end total loans receivable  2.15%  1.61%  1.41%  1.17%  1.46%  3.79%  2.15%  1.61%  1.41%  1.17%
Net charge-offs to average loans outstanding during the period  0.87%  0.79%  0.55%  0.39%  0.48%  2.48%  0.87%  0.79%  0.55%  0.39%
Provision for loan and lease losses to net charge-offs during the period 1.76x 1.36x 1.16 1.12 1.38 1.74x 1.76x 1.36x 1.16x 1.12x
 
(1) For 2008, carryover of the allowance for loan losses related to the $218 million auto loan portfolio acquired from Chrysler.
 
  For 2007,2005, allowance for loan losses from the acquisition of FirstBank Florida.
     The following table sets forth information concerning the allocation of the Corporation’s allowance for loan and lease losses by loan category and the percentage of loan balances in each category to the total of such loans as of the dates indicated:
                                         
  2008  2007  2006  2005  2004 
(In thousands) Amount  Percent  Amount  Percent  Amount  Percent  Amount  Percent  Amount  Percent 
  (Dollars in thousands) 
Residential real estate $15,016   27% $8,240   27% $6,488   25% $3,409   18% $1,595   14%
Commercial real estate loans  17,775   12%  13,699   11%  13,706   11%  9,827   9%  8,958   7%
Construction loans  83,482   12%  38,108   12%  18,438   13%  12,623   9%  5,077   4%
Commercial loans (including loans to local financial institutions)  74,358   33%  63,030   33%  53,929   32%  58,117   48%  70,906   59%
Consumer loans (1)  90,895   16%  67,091   17%  65,735   19%  64,023   16%  54,500   16%
                               
  $281,526   100% $190,168   100% $158,296   100% $147,999   100% $141,036   100%
                               
                                         
  2009  2008  2007  2006  2005 
(In thousands) Amount  Percent  Amount  Percent  Amount  Percent  Amount  Percent  Amount  Percent 
  (Dollars in thousands) 
Residential mortgage $31,165   26% $15,016   27% $8,240   27% $6,488   25% $3,409   18%
Commercial mortgage loans  63,972   11%  17,775   12%  13,699   11%  13,706   11%  9,827   9%
Construction loans  164,128   11%  83,482   12%  38,108   12%  18,438   13%  12,623   9%
Commercial and Industrial loans (including loans to local financial institutions)  186,007   38%  74,358   33%  63,030   33%  53,929   32%  58,117   48%
Consumer loans and finance leases  82,848   14%  90,895   16%  67,091   17%  65,735   19%  64,023   16%
                               
  $528,120   100% $281,526   100% $190,168   100% $158,296   100% $147,999   100%
                               
     The following table sets forth information concerning the composition of the Corporation’s allowance for loan and lease losses as of December 31, 2009 and 2008 by loan category and by whether the allowance and related provisions were calculated individually or through a general valuation allowance:

125


                         
  Residential Commercial     Construction Consumer and  
(Dollars in thousands) Mortgage Loans Mortgage Loans C&I Loans Loans Finance Leases Total
As of December 31, 2009
                        
Impaired loans without specific reserves:                        
Principal balance of loans, net of charge-offs $384,285  $62,920  $48,943  $100,028  $  $596,176 
                         
Impaired loans with specific reserves:                        
Principal balance of loans, net of charge-offs  60,040   159,284   243,123   597,641      1,060,088 
Allowance for loan and lease losses  2,616   30,945   62,491   86,093      182,145 
Allowance for loan and lease losses to principal balance  4.36%  19.43%  25.70%  14.41%  0.00%  17.18%
                         
Loans with general allowance:                        
Principal balance of loans  3,151,183   1,368,617   5,059,363   794,920   1,898,104   12,272,187 
Allowance for loan and lease losses  28,549   33,027   123,516   78,035   82,848   345,975 
Allowance for loan and lease losses to principal balance  0.91%  2.41%  2.44%  9.82%  4.36%  2.82%
                         
Total portfolio, excluding loans held for sale:                        
Principal balance of loans $3,595,508  $1,590,821  $5,351,429  $1,492,589  $1,898,104  $13,928,451 
Allowance for loan and lease losses  31,165   63,972   186,007   164,128   82,848   528,120 
Allowance for loan and lease losses to principal balance  0.87%  4.02%  3.48%  11.00%  4.36%  3.79%
                         
As of December 31, 2008
                        
Impaired loans without specific reserves:                        
Principal balance of loans, net of charge-offs $19,909  $18,359  $55,238  $22,809  $  $116,315 
                         
Impaired loans with specific reserves:                        
Principal balance of loans, net of charge-offs     47,323   79,760   257,831      384,914 
Allowance for loan and lease losses     8,680   18,343   56,330      83,353 
Allowance for loan and lease losses to principal balance  0.00%  18.34%  23.00%  21.85%  0.00%  21.65%
                         
Loans with general allowance:                        
Principal balance of loans  3,461,416   1,470,076   4,290,450   1,246,355   2,108,363   12,576,660 
Allowance for loan and lease losses  15,016   9,095   56,015   27,152   90,895   198,173 
Allowance for loan and lease losses to principal balance  0.43%  0.62%  1.31%  2.18%  4.31%  1.58%
                         
Total portfolio, excluding loans held for sale:                        
Principal balance of loans $3,481,325  $1,535,758  $4,425,448  $1,526,995  $2,108,363  $13,077,889 
Allowance for loan and lease losses  15,016   17,775   74,358   83,482   90,895   281,526 
Allowance for loan and lease losses to principal balance  0.43%  1.16%  1.68%  5.47%  4.31%  2.15%
     The following tables show the activity for impaired loans and related specific reserve during 2009:
     
Impaired Loans: (In thousands) 
Balance at beginning of year $501,229 
Loans determined impaired during the year  1,466,805 
Net charge-offs (1)  (244,154)
Loans sold, net of charge-offs of $49.6 million (2)  (39,374)
Loans foreclosed, paid in full and partial payments  (28,242)
    
Balance at end of year $1,656,264 
    
 
(1) Includes lease financing
     First BanCorp’s allowance for loan and lease losses was $281.5 million as of December 31, 2008, compared to $190.2 million as of December 31, 2007 and $158.3 million as of December 31, 2006. The provision for loan and lease losses for the year ended December 31, 2008 amounted to $190.9 million, compared to $120.6 million and $75.0 million for 2007 and 2006, respectively. The increase is mainly attributable to the significant increaseApproximately $114.2 million, or 47%, is related to construction loans in Florida and $44.6 million, or 18%, is related to construction loans in delinquency levels and increases in specific reserves for impaired commercial and construction loans adversely impacted by deteriorating economic conditions in the United States and Puerto Rico. Also, increases to reserve factors for potential losses inherent in the loan portfolio, higher reserves for the residential mortgage loan portfolio in the U.S. mainland and Puerto Rico and the overall growth of the Corporation’s loan portfolio contributed to higher charges in 2008. The Corporation experienced continued stress in the credit quality of and worsening trends on its construction loan portfolio, in particular, condo-conversion loans in the U.S. mainland (mainly in the state of Florida) affected by the continuing deterioration in the health of the economy, an oversupply of new homes and declining housing prices in the United States. To a lesser extent, the Corporation also increased its reserve factors for the residential mortgage and construction loan portfolio from the 2007 level to account for the increased credit risk tied to recessionary conditions in Puerto Rico’s economy, which are expected to continue at least through the remainder of 2009. The Puerto Rico housing market has not seen the dramatic decline in housing prices that is affecting the U.S. mainland; however, there has been a lower demand for houses due to diminished consumer purchasing power and confidence. The Corporation also does business in the Eastern Caribbean Region. Growth in this region has been fueled by an expansion in the construction, residential mortgage and small loan business sectors. Refer to “Provision and Allowance for Loan and Lease Losses” and “Lending Activities — Commercial and

111


Construction Loans” above and “Non-Accruing and Non-performing Assets” below for specific details about troubled loan relationships and the exposure to the geographic segments where the Corporation operates and detailed information about the Corporation’s construction loan portfolio.
     During 2008, the Corporation identified several commercial and construction loans amounting to $414.9 million that it determined should be classified as impaired, of which $382.0 million have a specific reserve of $82.9 million. Approximately $154.4 million of the $351.5 million commercial and construction loans that were determined to be impaired during 2008 are related to the Miami Corporate Banking operations condo-conversion loans, which has a related specific reserve of $36.0 million.
     Meanwhile, the Corporation’s impaired loans decreased by approximately $64.1 million during 2008, principally as a result of: (i) the foreclosure of two condo-conversion loans related to a troubled relationship in the Corporation’s Miami Corporate Banking Operations, with an aggregate principal balance of approximately $22.4 million and a related impairment reserve of $4.2 million, and (ii) the sale for $22.5 million, in the first half of 2008, of a condo-conversion loan that carried a principal balance of approximately $24.1 million and a related impairment reserve of $2.4 million related to the same troubled relationship in Miami. One of the foreclosed condo-conversion projects, with a carrying value of $3.8 million, was sold in the latter part of 2008 and a loss of $0.4 million was recorded. The Corporation expects to complete the sale of the last remaining foreclosed condo-conversion project in the U.S. mainland in the first half of 2009 and a write-down of $5.3 million to the value of this property was recorded for the fourth quarter of 2008. Other decreases in impaired loans may include loans paid in full, loans no longer considered impaired and loans charged-off.
     The Corporation continues its constant monitoring of its construction and commercial loan portfolio on the U.S. mainland and obtained new appraisals during 2008 for approximately 91% of the condo-conversion loans in its Miami Corporate Banking operations.
Credit Losses
     For 2008, total net charge-offs amounted to $108.3 million, or 0.87% of average loans, compared to $88.7 million or 0.79% for 2007 mainly related to the commercial and residential mortgage loan portfolios. The commercial portfolio in Puerto Rico has been adversely impacted by the deteriorating economic conditions while recent trends in real estate prices affected the residential mortgage loan portfolio. Although affected by the slow real estate market, the rate of losses on the Corporation’s residential real estate portfolio remains low. The ratio of net charge-offs to average loans on the Corporation’s residential mortgage loan portfolio was 0.19% and 0.03% for the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively, significantly lower than in the U.S. mainland.
     Commercial net charge-offs were significantly impacted by a $9.1 million charge-off, in the second quarter of 2008, related to a participation in a commercial loan in the U.S. Virgin Islands sold during the third quarter of 2008.
     An increase in net charge-offs for construction loans was also observed in 2008 in connection with the repossession and sale of loans from the aforementioned troubled relationship in the Corporate Banking operations in Miami, Florida that accounted for $6.2 million of the charge-offs recorded in 2008.
     Despite increases in the latter part of the year, the Corporation experienced a decrease in net charge-offs for consumer loans which amounted to $57.3 million for 2008, as compared to $64.3 million for 2007, attributable in part to the changes in underwriting standards implemented since late 2005 and the originations using these new underwriting standards of new consumer loans to replace maturing consumer loans that had an average life of approximately four years.

112


     The following table presents annualized charge-offs to average loans held-in-portfolio by geographic segment:
         
  December 31, 2008 December 31, 2007
PUERTO RICO:
        
         
Residential mortgage loans  0.20%  0.04%
Commercial loans  0.33%  0.24%
Construction loans  0.19%  0.09%
Consumer loans(1)
  3.10%  3.61%
Total loans  0.82%  0.91%
         
VIRGIN ISLANDS:
        
         
Residential mortgage loans  0.02%  0.00%
Commercial loans  4.46%  0.11%
Construction loans  0.00%  0.00%
Consumer loans  3.54%  2.19%
Total loans  1.48%  0.38%
         
UNITED STATES:
        
         
Residential mortgage loans  0.30%  0.02%
Commercial loans  0.58%  0.00%
Construction loans  1.08%  0.44%
Consumer loans  5.88%  2.60%
Total loans  0.86%  0.29%
(1)Includes Lease Financing.
     Total credit losses (equal to net charge-offs plus net gains and losses on REO operations) amounted to $129.7 million or a loss rate of 1.04% for 2008 compared to a loss of $91.1 million or a loss rate of 0.81% for 2007. A significant portion of the increase during 2008 is attributable to higher REO operating expenses and write-downs to the value of foreclosed condo-conversion projects in the United States.

113


     The following table presents a detail of the REO inventory and credit losses for the last two years:
Credit Loss Performance
         
  Year Ended 
  December 31, 
  2008  2007 
  (Dollars in thousands) 
REO
        
REO balances, carrying value:        
Residential $20,265  $9,717 
Commercial  2,306   4,727 
Condo-conversion projects  9,500    
Construction  5,175   1,672 
       
Total $37,246  $16,116 
       
         
REO activity (number of properties):        
Beginning property inventory,  87   44 
Properties acquired  169   74 
Properties disposed  (101)  (31)
       
Ending property inventory  155   87 
       
         
Average holding period (in days)        
Residential  160   208 
Commercial  237   59 
Condo-conversion projects  306    
Construction  145   76 
       
   200   150 
         
REO operations (losses) gains:        
Market adjustments and (losses) gains on sale:        
         
Residential $(3,521) $(97)
Commercial  (1,402)  (33)
Condo-conversion projects  (5,725)   
Construction  (347)  164 
       
   (10,995)  34 
       
         
Other REO operations expenses  (10,378)  (2,434)
       
Net Loss on REO operations
 $(21,373) $(2,400)
       
CHARGE-OFFS
        
Residential charge-offs, net  (6,256)  (984)
         
Commercial charge-offs, net  (27,897)  (10,596)
         
Construction charge-offs, net  (7,735)  (3,832)
         
Consumer and finance leases charge-offs, net  (66,433)  (73,326)
         
       
Total charge-offs, net  (108,321)  (88,738)
       
         
TOTAL CREDIT LOSSES (1)
 $(129,694) $(91,138)
       
         
LOSS RATIO PER CATEGORY (2):
        
         
Residential  0.29%  0.04%
Commercial  0.53%  0.22%
Construction  0.92%  0.25%
Consumer  3.18%  3.46%
         
TOTAL CREDIT LOSS RATIO (3)
  1.04%  0.81%
(1)Equal to REO operations (losses) gains plus Charge-offs, net.
 
(2) Calculated as net charge-offs plus market adjustments and gains (losses) on sale of REO divided by average loans and repossessed assets.
(3)Calculated as net charge-offs plus net loss on REO operations divided by average loans and repossessed assets.Related to five construction projects sold in Florida.
                     
  Year ended December 31, 2009    
  Construction  Commercial  Commercial Mortgage  Residential Mortgage    
(In thousands) Loans  Loans  Loans  Loans  Total 
Allowance for impaired loans, beginning of period $56,330  $18,343  $8,680  $  $83,353 
Provision for impaired loans  211,658   69,401   43,583   18,304   342,946 
Charge-offs  (181,895)  (25,253)  (21,318)  (15,688)  (244,154)
                
Allowance for impaired loans, end of period $86,093  $62,491  $30,945  $2,616  $182,145 
                

114126


Credit Quality
     We believe the most meaningful way to assess overall credit quality performance for 2009 is through an analysis of credit quality performance ratios. This approach forms the basis of most of the discussion in the two sections immediately following: Non-accruing and Non-performing assets and Net Charge-Offs and Total Credit Losses.
     Credit quality performance in 2009 was negatively impacted by the sustained economic weakness in Puerto Rico and the United States and the significant deterioration of the real estate market in Florida, although there were positive signs late in the year. In addition, we initiated certain actions in 2009 to reduce non-performing credits, including note sales and restructuring of loans into two separate agreement (loan splitting). We anticipate a challenging year in 2010 with regards to credit quality.
Non-accruing and Non-performing Assets
     Total non-performing assets are the sumconsist of non-accruing loans, foreclosed real estate and other repossessed properties.properties as well as non-performing investment securities. Non-accruing loans are those loans as toon which the accrual of interest is no longer being recognized.discontinued. When loans fall intoa loan is placed in non-accruing status, allany interest previously accruedrecognized and uncollected interestnot collected is reversed and charged against interest income.
Non-accruing Loans Policy
     Residential Real Estate Loans— The Corporation classifies real estate loans in non-accruing status when interest and principal have not been received for a period of 90 days or more.
     Commercial and Construction Loans— The Corporation places commercial loans (including commercial real estate and construction loans) in non-accruing status when interest and principal have not been received for a period of 90 days or more.more or when there are doubts about the potential to collect all of the principal based on collateral deficiencies or, in other situations, when collection of all of principal or interest is not expected due to deterioration in the financial condition of the borrower. Cash payments received on certain loans that are impaired and collateral dependent are recognized when collected in accordance with the contractual terms of the loans. The principal portion of the payment is used to reduce the principal balance of the loan, whereas the interest portion is recognized on a cash basis (when collected). However, when management believes that the ultimate collectability of principal is in doubt, the interest portion is applied to principal. The risk exposure of this portfolio is diversified as to individual borrowers and industries among other factors. In addition, a large portion is secured with real estate collateral.
     Finance Leases— Finance leases are classified in non-accruing status when interest and principal have not been received for a period of 90 days or more.
     Consumer Loans— Consumer loans are classified in non-accruing status when interest and principal have not been received for a period of 90 days or more.
Other Real Estate Owned (OREO)
     OREO acquired in settlement of loans is carried at the lower of cost (carrying value of the loan) or fair value less estimated costs to sell off the real estate at the date of acquisition (estimated realizable value).

127


Other Repossessed Property
     The other repossessed property category includes repossessed boats and autos acquired in settlement of loans. Repossessed boats and autos are recorded at the lower of cost or estimated fair value.
Investment Securities
     This category presents investment securities reclassified to non-accruing status, at their book value.
Past Due Loans
     Past due loans are accruing loans which are contractually delinquent 90 days or more. Past due loans are either current as to interest but delinquent in the payment of principal or are insured or guaranteed under applicable FHA and VA programs.
     The Corporation may also classify loans in non-accruing status and recognize revenue only when cash payments are received because of the deterioration in the financial condition of the borrower and payment in full of principal or interest is not expected.     During the third quarter of 2007, the Corporation started a loan loss mitigation program providing homeownership preservation assistance. Loans modified through this program are reported as non-performing loans and interest is recognized on a cash basis. When there is reasonable assurance of repayment and the borrower has made payments over a sustained period, the loan is returned to accruing status.

115


     The following table presents non-performing assets as of the dates indicated:
                                        
 2008 2007 2006 2005 2004  2009 2008 2007 2006 2005 
 (Dollars in thousands)  (Dollars in thousands) 
Non-accruing loans:  
Residential real estate $274,923 $209,077 $114,828 $54,777 $31,577 
Commercial and commercial real estate 144,301 73,445 62,978 33,855 31,675 
Residential mortgage $441,642 $274,923 $209,077 $114,828 $54,777 
Commercial mortgage 196,535 85,943 46,672 38,078 15,273 
Commercial and Industrial 241,316 58,358 26,773 24,900 18,582 
Construction 116,290 75,494 19,735 1,959 779  634,329 116,290 75,494 19,735 1,959 
Finance leases 6,026 6,250 8,045 3,272 2,212  5,207 6,026 6,250 8,045 3,272 
Consumer 45,635 48,784 46,501 40,459 25,422  44,834 45,635 48,784 46,501 40,459 
                      
 587,175 413,050 252,087 134,322 91,665  1,563,863 587,175 413,050 252,087 134,322 
                      
  
Other real estate owned(1)
 37,246 16,116 2,870 5,019 9,256 
REO 69,304 37,246 16,116 2,870 5,019 
Other repossessed property 12,794 10,154 12,103 9,631 7,291  12,898 12,794 10,154 12,103 9,631 
Investment securities(1)
 64,543     
                      
Total non-performing assets $637,215 $439,320 $267,060 $148,972 $108,212  $1,710,608 $637,215 $439,320 $267,060 $148,972 
                      
  
Past due loans $471,364 $75,456 $31,645 $27,501 $18,359 
Past due loans 90 days and still accruing $165,936 $471,364 $75,456 $31,645 $27,501 
  
Non-performing assets to total assets  3.27%  2.56%  1.54%  0.75%  0.69%  8.71%  3.27%  2.56%  1.54%  0.75%
  
Non-accruing loans to total loans receivable  4.49%  3.50%  2.24%  1.06%  0.95%  11.23%  4.49%  3.50%  2.24%  1.06%
  
Allowance for loan and lease losses $281,526 $190,168 $158,296 $147,999 $141,036  $528,120 $281,526 $190,168 $158,296 $147,999 
  
Allowance to total non-accruing loans  47.95%  46.04%  62.79%  110.18%  153.86%  33.77%  47.95%  46.04%  62.79%  110.18%
  
Allowance to total non-accruing loans, excluding residential real estate loans  90.16%  93.23%  115.33%  186.06%  234.72%  47.06%  90.16%  93.23%  115.33%  186.06%
 
(1) As of December 31, 2008, other real estate owned include approximately $14.8 million of foreclosed properties in the U.S. mainland.Collateral pledged with Lehman Brothers Special Financing, Inc.
     Total non-performing assets increased by $197.9 million, or 45%, from $439.3 million as of December 31, 20072009 was $1.71 billion compared to $637.2 million as of December 31, 2008. The slumping economy and deteriorating housing marketEven though deterioration in the United States coupled with recessionary conditions in Puerto Rico’s economy, have resulted in higher non-performing balancescredit quality was observed in all of the Corporation’s portfolios, it was more significant in the construction and commercial loan portfolios.
     With regardsportfolios, which were affected by both the stagnant housing market and further weakening in the economies of the markets served during most of 2009. The increase in non-performing assets was led by an increase of $518.0 million in non-performing construction loans, of which $314.1 million is related to the United Statesconstruction loan portfolio totalin Puerto Rico portfolio and $205.2 million is related to construction projects in Florida. Other portfolios that experienced a significant growth in credit risk, mainly in Puerto Rico, include: (i) a $183.0 million increase in non-performing commercial and industrial (“C&I”) loans, (ii) a $166.7 million increase in non-performing residential mortgage loans, and (ii) a $110.6 million increase in non-performing commercial mortgage loans. Also, during 2009, the Corporation classified as non-performing investment securities with a book value of $64.5 million that were pledged to Lehman Brothers Special Financing, Inc., in connection with several interest rate swap agreements entered into with that institution. Considering that the investment securities have not yet been recovered by the Corporation, despite its efforts in this regard, the

128


Corporation decided to classify such investments as non-performing. It is important to note that although there was a significant increase in non-performing assets from December 31, 2008, to December 31,2009, there was a slower growth rate in the 2009 fourth quarter as compared to all previous quarters in 2009 as a result of actions taken by the Corporation including note sales, restructuring of loans into two separate agreements (loan splitting) and restructured loans restored to accrual status after a sustained period of repayment and that have been deemed collectible.
     Total non-performing construction loans increased by $518.0 million from December 31, 2008. The non-performing construction loans in Puerto Rico increased by $314.1 million in 2009 primarily related to $104.0residential housing projects. There were 10 relationships greater than $10 million in non-accrual status as of December 31, 2009, compared to two as of December 31, 2008, including $123.8 million on two high-rise residential projects.
     Non-performing construction loans in Florida increased by $205.2 million from December 31, 2008. There were five relationships in the state of Florida greater than $10 million totaling $186.8 million as of December 31, 2008 from $58.5 million at the end of 2007, up $45.5 million or 78%. All segments were severely affected by the economy and housing market crisis in the U.S. with the total variance resulting from: (i) an increase of $13.8 million for residential real estate loans and $3.6 million for foreclosed residential properties; (ii) an increase of $4.1 million in non-performing construction, land loans and foreclosed condo-conversion projects; (iii) an increase of $23.3 million in commercial loans, mainly secured by real estate, and (iv) an increase of $0.7 million in the consumer lending sector. Despite the overall increase, during 2008 the Corporation disposed of approximately $25.6 million of non-performing assets in the U.S. by: (i) the sale in the first half of 2008 for $22.5 million of one impaired condo-conversion loan in a troubled relationship in its Miami Corporate Banking operations with a carrying value of $21.8 million, and (ii) the sale during the fourth quarter of 2008 of repossessed real estate with a carrying value of $3.8 million that previously served as collateral for another condo conversion loan of the same troubled relationship and for which a loss of $0.4 million was recorded. The Corporation expects to complete the sale of the last remaining foreclosed condo-conversion project in the U.S. mainland in the first half of 2009. A write-down of $5.3 million to the value of this property was recorded for the fourth quarter of 2008.
     The Corporation has incurred in total expenditures, including legal fees, maintenance fees and property taxes, in connection with the resolution of the above mentioned impaired relationship that caused the foreclosures in Miami amounting to approximately $8.2 million since 2007, of which $6.1 million were incurred during 2008.
     Non-performing assets in Puerto Rico increased to $512.6 million as of December 31, 2008 from $362.1 million at the end of 2007, up $150.5 million or 42%. The total variance breakdown includes: (i) an increase of $49.6 million for non-performing residential real estate loans and $7.6 million in foreclosed real estate properties; (ii) an increase of $45.6 million in non-performing construction and land loans, and (iii) an increase of $48.0 million in commercial loans. All segments of the loan portfolios were impacted by the current economic crisis. On a positive

116


note, non-performing consumer assets (including finance leases) remained relatively unchanged2009 compared to December 31, 2007 balances.
     In Puerto Rico, the increase in non-performing construction loans is principally related to two loans with an aggregate outstanding balanceone relationship of $32.3 million extended for the development of residential projects placed in non-accrual status in light of lower than expected demand due to a diminished consumer purchasing power and general economic conditions, which in turn affected the borrowers’ cash flow position. The construction loan portfolio is affected by the deterioration in the economy because the underlying loans’ repayment capacity is dependent on the ability to attract buyers and maintain housing prices. The largest non-accrual commercial loan amounted to $7.7 million and was placed in non-accrual status during the fourth quarter of 2008 after it was formally restructured.
     Despite the increase in absolute numbers, the non-performing to total residential mortgage loan ratio for the Puerto Rico portfolio only increased 1% since the end of 2007. The relative stability of non-performing residential loans in Puerto Rico reflects, to some extent, the positive impact of loans modified through the loan loss mitigation program. Since the inception of the program in the third quarter of 2007, the Corporation has completed approximately 367 loan modifications with an outstanding balance of approximately $60.0$11.1 million as of December 31, 2008. Of this amount, $53.2Most of the non-performing loans in Florida are related to condo-conversion and residential housing projects affected by low absorption rates. Even though a significant increase was observed from 2008 to 2009, there was a decrease experienced in the last quarter of 2009 mainly due to note sales and loans restructured into two notes. During the fourth quarter of 2009, the Corporation completed the sales of non-performing construction loans in Florida totaling approximately $40.4 million and also completed the restructuring of condo-conversion loans with an aggregate book value of $38.1 million.
     Non-performing construction loans in the Virgin Islands decreased by $1.3 million.
     The C&I non-performing loans portfolio increased by $183.0 million from December 31, 2008. Non-performing C&I loans in Puerto Rico increased by $174.5 million, reflecting the sustained economic weakness that affected several industries such as food and beverage, accommodation, financial and printing. There were four relationships greater than $10 million as of December 31, 2009 totaling $101.8 million that entered into non-accrual status during 2009 and accounted for 55% of the increase. C&I non-performing loans in Florida and Virgin Islands were more stable with increases of $2.2 million and $6.2 million, respectively, from December 31, 2008.
     Total non-performing commercial mortgage loans increased by $110.6 million from December 31, 2008. Non-performing commercial mortgage loans in Puerto Rico increased by $66.5 million spread across several industries. In Florida, non-performing commercial mortgage loans increased by $33.8 million from December 31, 2008, including a single rental-property relationship of $11.4 million. Non-performing commercial mortgage loans in the Virgin Islands increased by $10.3 million.
     In many cases, commercial and construction loans were placed on non-accrual status even though the loan was less than 90 days past due in their interest payments. At the close of 2009, approximately $229.4 million of loans placed in non-accrual status, mainly construction and commercial loans, were current or had delinquencies less than 90 days in their interest payments. Further, collections are being recorded on a cash basis through earnings, or on a cost-recovery basis, as conditions warrant. In Florida, as sales of units within condo-conversion projects continue to lag, some borrowers reverted to rental projects. For several of these loans, cash collections cover interest, property taxes, insurance and other operating costs associated with the projects.
During the year ended December 31, 2009, interest income of approximately $4.7 million related to $761.5 million of non-performing loans, mainly non-performing construction and commercial loans, was applied against the related principal balances under the cost-recovery method. The Corporation will continue to evaluate restructuring alternatives to mitigate losses and enable borrowers to repay their loans under revised terms in an effort to preserve the value of the Corporation’s interests over the long-term.
Non-performing residential mortgage loans increased by $166.7 million during 2009, mainly attributable to the Puerto Rico portfolio, which has been adversely affected by the continued trend of higher unemployment rates affecting consumers and includes $36.9 million related to loans acquired in the previously explained transaction with R&G. The non-performing residential mortgage loan portfolio in Puerto Rico increased by $131.2 million during 2009. The Corporation continues to address loss mitigation and loan modifications by offering alternatives to

129


avoid foreclosures through internal programs and programs sponsored by the Federal Government. In Florida, non-performing residential mortgage loans increased by $35.0 million from December 31, 2008, however, a decrease was observed in the last quarter due to modified loans that have been outstanding long enoughrestored to be considered for interest accrual of which $32.8 million have been formally returned to accruing status after a sustained period of repayments.
     Historically,repayment performance (generally six months) and are deemed collectible. During 2009, the Corporation has experienced a low rate of losses on its residential real estate portfolio, given that the real estate market in Puerto Rico has not shown notable declines in the market value of properties in almost four decades, overall comfortable loan-to-value ratios, and the limited amount of construction considering Puerto Rico is an island with finite land resources. The net charge-offs to average loans ratio on the Corporation’snon-performing residential mortgage loan portfolio in the Virgin Islands increased by $0.6 million.
     The consumer and finance leases non-performing loan portfolio remained relatively flat at $50.0 million as of December 31, 2009 when compared to $51.7 million as of December 31, 2008. This portfolio showed signs of stability and benefited from changes in underwriting standards implemented in late 2005. The consumer loan portfolio, with an average life of approximately four years, has been replenished by new originations under the revised standards.
     The allowance to non-performing loans ratio as of December 31, 2009 was 0.19%33.77%, compared to 47.95% as of December 31, 2008. The decrease in the ratio is attributable in part to non-performing collateral dependent loans that are evaluated individually for impairment that, after charge-offs, reflected limited impairment or no impairment at all, and other impaired loans that did not require specific reserves based on collateral values or cash flows projections analyses performed. Also 17% of the increase in non-performing loans since December 31, 2008 is related to residential mortgage loans, mainly in Puerto Rico, where the Corporation’s loan loss experience has been comparatively low due to, among other things, the Corporation’s conservative underwriting practices and 0.03%loan-to-value ratios, thus requiring a lower general reserve as compared to other portfolios.
     As of December 31, 2009, approximately $517.7 million, or 33%, of total non-performing loans have been charged-off to their net realizable value as set forth below:
                         
  Residential  Commercial      Construction  Consumer and    
(Dollars in thousands) Mortgage Loans  Mortgage Loans  C&I Loans  Loans  Finance Leases  Total 
As of December 31, 2009
                        
Non-performing loans charged-off to realizable value $320,224  $38,421  $19,244  $139,787  $  $517,676 
Other non-performing loans  121,418   158,114   222,072   494,542   50,041   1,046,187 
                   
Total non-performing loans $441,642  $196,535  $241,316  $634,329  $50,041  $1,563,863 
                   
                         
Allowance to non-performing loans  7.06%  32.55%  77.08%  25.87%  165.56%  33.77%
Allowance to non-performing loans, excluding non-performing loans charged-off to realizable value  25.67%  40.46%  83.76%  33.19%  165.56%  50.48%
                         
As of December 31, 2008
                        
                         
Non-performing loans charged-off to realizable value $19,909  $8,852  $9,890  $1,810  $  $40,461 
Other non-performing loans  255,014   77,091   48,468   114,480   51,661   546,714 
                   
Total non-performing loans $274,923  $85,943  $58,358  $116,290  $51,661  $587,175 
                   
                         
Allowance to non-performing loans  5.46%  20.68%  127.42%  71.79%  175.95%  47.95%
Allowance to non-performing loans, excluding non-performing loans charged-off to realizable value  5.89%  23.06%  153.42%  72.92%  175.95%  51.49%
The Corporation provides homeownership preservation assistance to its customers through a loss mitigation program in Puerto Rico and through programs sponsored by the Federal Government. Due to the nature of the borrower’s financial condition, the restructure or loan modification through these program as well as other restructurings of individual commercial, commercial mortgage loans, construction loans and residential mortgages in the U.S. mainland fit the definition of Troubled Debt Restructuring (“TDR”). A restructuring of a debt constitutes a TDR if the creditor for economic or legal reasons related to the debtor’s financial difficulties grants a concession to the debtor that it would not otherwise consider. Modifications involve changes in one or more of the loan terms that bring a defaulted loan current and provide sustainable affordability. Changes may include the refinancing of any past-due amounts, including interest and escrow, the extension of the maturity of the loans and modifications of the loan rate. As of December 31, 2009, the Corporation’s TDR loans consisted of $124.1 million of residential mortgage loans, $42.1 million commercial and industrial loans, $68.1 million commercial mortgage loans and $101.7 million of construction loans. From the $336.0 million total TDR loans, approximately $130.4 million are in compliance with modified terms, $23.8 million are 30-89 days delinquent, and $181.8 million are classified as non-accrual as of December 31, 2009.

130


     Included in the $101.7 million of construction TDR loans are certain impaired condo-conversion loans restructured into two separate agreements (loan splitting) in the fourth quarter of 2009. Each of these loans were restructured into two notes: one that represents the portion of the loan that is expected to be fully collected along with contractual interest and the second note that represents the portion of the original loan that was charged-off. The renegotiations of these loans have been made after analyzing the borrowers and guarantors capacity to serve the debt and ability to perform under the modified terms. As part of the renegotiation of the loans, the first note of each loan have been placed on a monthly payment that amortize the debt over 25 years at a market rate of interest. An interest rate reduction was granted for the year endedsecond note. The following tables provide additional information about the volume of this type of loan restructurings and the effect on December 31, 2007, significantly lower thanthe allowance for loan and lease losses in 2009.
     
  (In thousands) 
Principal balance deemed collectible $22,374 
    
Amount charged-off $(29,713)
    
     
Specific Reserve: (In thousands) 
Balance at beginning of year $14,375 
Provision for loan losses  17,213 
Charge-offs  (29,713)
    
Balance at end of year $1,875 
    
     The loans comprising the United States mainland market.$22.4 million that have been deemed collectible continue to be individually evaluated for impairment purposes. These transactions contributed to a $29.9 million decrease in non-performing loans during the last quarter of 2009.
     Past due and still accruing loans, which are contractually delinquent 90 days or more, amounted to $471.4$165.9 million as of December 31, 2008 (20072009 (2008$75.5$471.4 million) of which $71.1 million are government guaranteed loans.
Net Charge-Offs and Total Credit Losses
     The Corporation’s net charge-offs for 2009 were $333.3 million, or 2.48%, most of them relatedaverage loans compared to matured$108.3 million or 0.87% of average loans for 2008. The significant increase is mainly due to the continued deterioration in the collateral values of construction loans, accordingprimarily in the Florida region. Florida’s economy has been hampered by a deteriorating housing market since the second half of 2007. The overbuilding in the face of waning demand, among other things, caused a decline in the housing prices. The Corporation had been obtaining appraisals and increasing its reserve, as necessary, with expectations for a gradual housing market recovery. Nonetheless, the passage of time increased the possibility that the recovery of the market will not be in the near term. For these reasons, the Corporation decided to contractual terms but arecharge-off during 2009 collateral deficiencies for a significant amount of impaired collateral dependent loans based on current with respectappraisals obtained. The deficiencies in the collateral raised doubts about the potential to interest payments. Acollect the principal. The Corporation is engaged in continuous efforts to identify alternatives that enable borrowers to repay their loans and protect the Corporation’s investment.
     Total construction net charge-offs in 2009 were $183.6 million, or 11.54% of average loans, up from $7.7 million, or 0.52% of average loans in 2008. Condo-conversion and residential development projects in Florida represent a significant portion of these matured construction loansthe losses. There were already renewed$137.4 million in net-charge offs in 2009 related to construction projects in Florida. Approximately $79.2 million of the charge-offs for 2009 was recorded in connection with loans sold and loan split type of restructuring. Net charge-offs of $46.2 million were recorded in connection with the Corporation expects to completeconstruction loan portfolio in Puerto Rico, mainly residential housing projects. We continued our ongoing portfolio management efforts, including obtaining updated appraisals on properties and assessing a project status within the renewal process for the remaining portion in the first halfcontext of 2009.market environment expectations.
     In viewTotal commercial mortgage net charge-offs in 2009 were $25.2 million, or 1.64% of current conditionsaverage loans, up from $3.7 million, or 0.27% of average loans in 2008. The charge-offs in 2009 were spread through several loans, distributed across our geographic markets. Commercial mortgage net charge-offs for 2009 in Puerto Rico were $7.9 million, in the United States housing market$15.2 million and weakening economic conditions$2.1 million in the Virgin Islands.

131


     Total C&I net charge-offs in 2009 were $34.5 million, or 0.72% of average loans, up from $24.2 million, or 0.59% of average loans in 2008. C&I loans net charge-offs were distributed across several industries, principally in Puerto Rico. C&I net charge-offs for 2009 in Puerto Rico were $32.8 million, in the Corporation may experience further deteriorationUnited States $0.6 million and $1.1 million in the Virgin Islands. In assessing C&I net charge-offs trends, it is helpful to understand the process of how these loans are treated as they deteriorate over time. Reserves for loans are established at origination consistent with the level of risk associated with the original underwriting. If the quality of a commercial loan deteriorates, it migrates to a lower quality risk rating as a result of our normal portfolio management process, and a higher reserve amount is assigned. As a part of our normal portfolio management process, the loan is reviewed and reserves are increased as warranted. Charge-offs, if necessary, are generally recognized in a period after the reserves were established. If the previously established reserves exceed that needed to satisfactorily resolve the problem credit, a reduction in the overall level of the reserve could be recognized. In summary, if loan quality deteriorates, the typical credit sequence for commercial loans are periods of reserve building, followed by periods of higher net charge-offs as previously established reserves are utilized. Additionally, it is helpful to understand that increases in reserves either precede or are in conjunction with increases in impaired commercial loans. When a credit is classified as impaired, it is evaluated for specific reserves or charged-off.
     Residential mortgage net charge-offs were $28.9 million, or 0.82% of related average loans in 2009. This was up from $6.3 million, or 0.19% of related average balances in 2008. The higher loss level for 2009 was a result of negative trends in delinquency levels. Approximately $15.7 million in charge-offs for 2009 ($7.1 million in Puerto Rico and $8.5 million in Florida) resulted from valuations, for impairment purposes, of residential mortgage loan portfolios with high delinquency and loan-to-value levels, compared to $1.8 million recorded in 2008. Total residential mortgage loan portfolios evaluated for impairment purposes and charged-off to their net realizable value amounted to $320.2 million as of December 31, 2009. This amount represents approximately 73% of the total non-performing residential mortgage loan portfolio outstanding as of December 31, 2009. Net charge-offs for residential mortgage loans also includes $11.2 million related to loans foreclosed during 2009, up from $3.9 million recorded for loans foreclosed in 2008. Consistent with the Corporation’s assessment of the value of properties, current and future market conditions, management is executing strategies to accelerate the sale of the real estate acquired in satisfaction of debt (REO). The ratio of net charge-offs to average loans on the Corporation’s residential mortgage loan portfolio of 0.82% for 2009 is lower than the approximately 2.4% average charge-off rate for commercial banks in the U.S. mainland for the third quarter of 2009 as per statistical releases published by the Federal Reserve on its website.
     Net charge-offs of consumer loans and finance leases in 2009 were $61.1 million, or 3.05% of related average loans, compared to net charge-offs of $66.4 million, or 3.19% of related average loans for 2008. Performance of this portfolio on both an absolute and relative basis continued to be consistent with our views regarding the underlying quality of the portfolio. The 2009 level of delinquencies has improved compared with 2008 levels, further supporting our view of stable performance going forward.
The following table presents charge-offs to average loans held in particularportfolio:
                     
  Year Ended
  December 31, December 31, December 31, December 31, December 31,
  2009 2008 2007 2006 2005
Residential mortgage  0.82%  0.19%  0.03%  0.04%  0.05%
Commercial mortgage  1.64%  0.27%  0.10%  0.00%  0.03%
Commercial and Industrial  0.72%  0.59%  0.26%  0.06%  0.11%
Construction  11.54%  0.52%  0.26%  0.00%  0.00%
Consumer and finance leases  3.05%  3.19%  3.48%  2.90%  2.06%
Total loans  2.48%  0.87%  0.79%  0.55%  0.39%

132


The following table presents net charge-offs to average loans held in portfolio by geographic segment:
         
  December 31, 2009 December 31, 2008
PUERTO RICO:
        
         
Residential mortgage  0.64%  0.20%
         
Commercial mortgage  0.82%  0.37%
         
Commercial and Industrial  0.72%  0.32%
         
Construction  4.88%  0.19%
         
Consumer and finance leases  2.93%  3.10%
         
Total loans  1.44%  0.82%
         
VIRGIN ISLANDS:
        
         
Residential mortgage  0.08%  0.02%
         
Commercial mortgage  2.79%  0.00%
         
Commercial and Industrial  0.59%  6.73%
         
Construction  0.00%  0.00%
         
Consumer and finance leases  3.50%  3.54%
         
Total loans  0.73%  1.48%
         
FLORIDA:
        
         
Residential mortgage  2.84%  0.30%
         
Commercial mortgage  3.02%  0.09%
         
Commercial and Industrial  1.87%  6.58%
         
Construction  29.93%  1.08%
         
Consumer and finance leases  7.33%  5.88%
         
Total loans  11.70%  0.86%
Total credit losses (equal to net charge-offs plus losses on REO operations) for 2009 amounted to $355.1 million, or 2.62% to average loans and repossessed assets, respectively, in contrast to credit losses of $129.7 million, or a loss rate of 1.04%, for 2008. In addition, there was a $1.8 million increase in the reserve for probable losses on outstanding unfunded loan commitments.

133


The following table presents a detail of the commercialREO inventory and construction loan portfolio.credit losses for the periods indicated:
         
  Year Ended 
  December 31, 
  2009  2008 
  (Dollars in thousands) 
REO
        
REO balances, carrying value:        
Residential $35,778  $20,265 
Commercial  19,149   2,306 
Condo-conversion projects  8,000   9,500 
Construction  6,377   5,175 
       
Total $69,304  $37,246 
       
         
REO activity (number of properties):        
Beginning property inventory,  155   87 
Properties acquired  295   169 
Properties disposed  (165)  (101)
       
Ending property inventory  285   155 
       
         
Average holding period (in days)        
Residential  221   160 
Commercial  170   237 
Condo-conversion projects  643   306 
Construction  330   145 
       
   266   200 
         
REO operations (loss) gain:        
Market adjustments and (losses) gain on sale:        
         
Residential $(9,613) $(3,521)
Commercial  (1,274)  (1,402)
Condo-conversion projects  (1,500)  (5,725)
Construction  (1,977)  (347)
       
   (14,364)  (10,995)
       
         
Other REO operations expenses  (7,499)  (10,378)
       
Net Loss on REO operations
 $(21,863) $(21,373)
       
         
CHARGE-OFFS
        
Residential charge-offs, net  (28,861)  (6,256)
         
Commercial charge-offs, net  (59,712)  (27,897)
         
Construction charge-offs, net  (183,600)  (7,735)
         
Consumer and finance leases charge-offs, net  (61,091)  (66,433)
       
Total charge-offs, net  (333,264)  (108,321)
       
 
TOTAL CREDIT LOSSES (1)
 $(355,127) $(129,694)
       
         
LOSS RATIO PER CATEGORY (2):
        
Residential  1.08%  0.29%
Commercial  0.96%  0.53%
Construction  11.65%  0.92%
Consumer  3.04%  3.18%
         
TOTAL CREDIT LOSS RATIO (3)
  2.62%  1.04%
(1)Equal to REO operations (losses) gains plus Charge-offs, net.
(2)Calculated as net charge-offs plus market adjustments and gains (losses) on sale of REO divided by average loans and repossessed assets.
(3)Calculated as net charge-offs plus net loss on REO operations divided by average loans and repossessed assets.
Operational Risk
     The Corporation faces ongoing and emerging risk and regulatory pressure related to the activities that surround the delivery of banking and financial products. Coupled with external influences such as market conditions, security risks, and legal risk, the potential for operational and reputational loss has increased. In order to mitigate and control operational risk, the Corporation has developed, and continues to enhance, specific internal controls, policies and

134


procedures that are designated to identify and manage operational risk at appropriate levels throughout the organization. The purpose of these mechanisms is to provide reasonable assurance that the Corporation’s business operations are functioning within the policies and limits established by management.
     The Corporation classifies operational risk into two major categories: business specific and corporate-wide affecting all business lines. For business specific risks, a risk assessment group works with the various business units to ensure consistency in policies, processes and assessments. With respect to corporate-wide risks, such as information security, business recovery, legal and compliance, the Corporation has specialized groups, such as the Legal Department, Information Security, Corporate Compliance, Information Technology and Operations. These groups assist the lines of business in the development and implementation of risk management practices specific to the needs of the business groups.
Legal and RegulatoryCompliance Risk
     Legal and regulatorycompliance risk includes the risk of non-compliance with applicable legal and regulatory requirements, the risk of adverse legal judgments against the Corporation, and the risk that a counterparty’s performance

117


obligations will be unenforceable. The Corporation is subject to extensive regulation in the different jurisdictions in which it conducts itits business, and this regulatory scrutiny has been significantly increasing over the last several years. The Corporation has established and continues to enhance procedures based on legal and regulatory requirements that are reasonably designed to ensure compliance with all applicable statutory and regulatory requirements. The Corporation has a Compliance Director who reports to the Chief Risk Officer and is responsible for the oversight of regulatory compliance and implementation of an enterprise-wide compliance risk assessment process. The Compliance division has officer roles in each major business areas with direct reporting relationships to the Corporate Compliance Group.
Impact of Inflation and Changing Prices
     The financial statements and related data presented herein have been prepared in conformity with GAAP, which require the measurement of financial position and operating results in terms of historical dollars without considering changes in the relative purchasing power of money over time due to inflation.
     Unlike most industrial companies, substantially all of the assets and liabilities of a financial institution are monetary in nature. As a result, interest rates have a greater impact on a financial institution’s performance than the effects of general levels of inflation. Interest rate movements are not necessarily correlated with changes in the prices of goods and services.
Concentration Risk
     The Corporation conducts its operations in a geographically concentrated area, as its main market is Puerto Rico. However, the Corporation continues diversifying its geographical risk as evidenced by its operations in the Virgin Islands and through FirstBankin Florida.
As of December 31, 2009, the Corporation had $1.2 billion outstanding of credit facilities granted to the Puerto Rico Government and/or its political subdivisions. A substantial portion of these credit facilities are obligations that have a specific source of income or revenues identified for their repayment, such as sales and property taxes collected by the central Government and/or municipalities. Another portion of these obligations consist of loans to public corporations that obtain revenues from rates charged for services or products, such as electric power utilities. Public corporations have varying degrees of independence from the central Government and many receive appropriations or other payments from it. The Corporation’sCorporation also has loans to various municipalities in Puerto Rico for which the good faith, credit and unlimited taxing power of the applicable municipality has been pledged to their repayment.
     Aside from loans extended to the Puerto Rico Government and its political subdivisions, the largest concentrationloan to one borrower as of December 31, 20082009 in the amount of $348.8$321.5 million is with one mortgage originator in Puerto Rico, Doral Financial Corporation. Together with the Corporation’s next largestThis commercial loan concentration of $218.9 million with another mortgage originator in Puerto Rico, R&G Financial, the Corporation’s total loans granted to these mortgage originators amounted to $567.7 million as of December 31, 2008. These commercial loans areis secured by individual mortgage loans on residential and commercial real estate. In December 2005, the Corporation obtained a waiver from the Office of the Commissioner of Financial Institutions of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico with respect to the statutory limit for individual borrowers (loan-to-one borrower limit). Of the total gross loan portfolio including loans held for sale, of $13.1$13.9 billion as of December 31, 2008,2009, approximately 81% have83% has credit risk concentration in Puerto Rico, 11%9% in the United States and 8% in the Virgin Islands.

135


Selected Quarterly Financial Data
     Financial data showing results of the 20082009 and 20072008 quarters is presented below. In the opinion of management, all adjustments necessary for a fair presentation have been included. These results are unaudited.

118

                 
  2009
  March 31 June 30 September 30 December 31
  (Dollar in thousands, except for per share results)
Interest income $258,323  $252,780  $242,022  $243,449 
Net interest income  121,598   131,014   129,133   137,297 
Provision for loan losses  59,429   235,152   148,090   137,187 
Net income (loss)  21,891   (78,658)  (165,218)  (53,202)
Net income (loss) attributable to common stockholders  6,773   (94,825)  (174,689)  (59,334)
Earnings (loss) per common share-basic $0.07  $(1.03) $(1.89) $(0.64)
Earnings (loss) per common share-diluted $0.07  $(1.03) $(1.89) $(0.64)


                 
  2008
  March 31 June 30 September 30 December 31
  (Dollar in thousands, except for per share results)
Interest income $279,087  $276,608  $288,292  $282,910 
Net interest income  124,458   134,606   144,621   124,196 
Provision for loan losses  45,793   41,323   55,319   48,513 
Net income  33,589   32,994   24,546   18,808 
Net income attributable to common stockholders  23,520   22,925   14,477   8,739 
Earnings per common share-basic $0.25  $0.25  $0.16  $0.09 
Earnings per common share-diluted $0.25  $0.25  $0.16  $0.09 
                 
  2007
  March 31 June 30 September 30 December 31
  (Dollar in thousands, except for per share results)
Interest income $298,585  $305,871  $295,931  $288,860 
Net interest income  117,435   117,215   105,029   111,337 
Provision for loan losses  24,914   24,628   34,260   36,808 
Net income  22,832   23,795   14,142   7,367 
Net income (loss) attributable to common stockholders  12,763   13,726   4,073   (2,702)
Earnings (loss) per common share-basic $0.15  $0.16  $0.05  $(0.03)
Earnings (loss) per common share-diluted $0.15  $0.16  $0.05  $(0.03)
Fourth Quarter Financial Summary
The financial results for the fourth quarter of 2008,2009, as compared to the same period in 2007,2008, were principally impacted by the following items on a pre-tax basis:
  Net interest income increased 12%11% to $137.3 million for the fourth quarter of 2009 from $124.2 million for the fourth quarter of 2008 from $111.3 million in2008. Net interest income for the fourth quarter of 2007.2009 includes a net unrealized gain of $2.5 million, compared to a net unrealized loss of $5.3 million for the fourth quarter of 2008, a positive fluctuation of $7.8 million, related to the changes in valuation of derivatives instruments that enonomically hedge the Corporation’s brokered CDs and medium term notes and unrealized gains and losses on liabilities measured at fair value. Compared with the fourth quarter of 2008, net interest income, excluding fair value adjustments on derivatives and financial liabilities measured at fair value, increased $5.3 million, or 4%. The Corporation benefited from lower short-termfunding costs related to continued low levels of interest rates on its interest-bearing liabilities as compared toand the mix of financing sources. Lower interest rate levels duringwas reflected in the pricing of newly issued brokered CDs at rates significantly lower than rate levels for prior year’s fourth quarter. The average cost of brokered CDs decreased by 154 basis points from 4.06% for the fourth quarter of 2007. Net interest spread and margin on a tax equivalent basis were 2.71% and 3.06%, respectively, up 39 and 21 basis points2008 to 2.52% for the fourth quarter of 2009. Also, the Corporation was able to reduce the average cost of its core deposits from the2.83% for prior year’s fourth quarter. During 2008, the targetquarter to 1.95% for the Federal Funds rate was lowered from 4.25% to a rangefourth quarter of 0% to 0.25% through seven separate actions in an attempt to stimulate the U.S. economy, officially in recession since December 2007.2009. The decrease in funding costs associated with lower short-term interest rates was partially offset by lower loan yields due toa significant increase in non-performing loans and the repricing of variable-ratefloating-rate commercial and construction and commercial loans tiedat lower rates due to short-term indexesdecreases in market interest rates such as three-month LIBOR and the significant increase inPrime rate, even though the volume of non-accrual loans.Corporation is actively increasing spreads on loan renewals. The increase in net interest income was also associated with an increase of $2.3 billion$429.6 million of interest-earning assets, over the prior year’s fourth quarter. AverageThe increase in interest-earnings assets was driven by a higher average loans volume, which increased by $1.4 billion,$847 million, driven by internal originations,additional credit facilities extended to the Government of Puerto Rico. Partially offsetting the increase in particular commercialaverage loans was a decrease in average investments of $417 million, driven mostly by the sales of approximately $1.7 billion of Agency MBS and residential real estate loans, and to a lesser extent,calls of approximately $945 million of U.S. Agency debt securities that were more than purchases of loansmade during 2008 that contributed to a wider spread.2009.
  Non-interest income increased to $19.4$38.8 million for the fourth quarter of 20082009 from $16.5$19.4 million for theprior year’s fourth quarter of 2007.quarter. The variance is mainly related to a realized gain of $11.0$24.4 million on the sale of certain U.S. sponsored agency fixed-rateAgency MBS during the fourth quarter of 2008, compared toversus a realized gain of $4.7 million on the sale of investment securities recordedMBS of $11.0 million in prior year’s fourth quarter. The

136


recent drop in mortgage pre-payments, as well as future pre-payment estimates, could result in the extension of the MBS portfolio’s average life, which in turn would shift the balance sheet’s interest rate gap position. In an effort to manage such risk, and take advantage of market opportunities, approximately $460 million of U.S. Agency MBS ( mainly 30 Year fixed rate MBS with an aggregate weighted average rate of 5.33%) were sold in the fourth quarter of 2007. The surge in MBS prices, responding2009, compared to the U.S. government announcement that it will invest in MBS, offered a market opportunity to realize a gain on the sale of approximately $284 million fixed-rateof U.S. agencyAgency MBS that carried a weighted average yield of 5.35%.sold in the prior year’s fourth quarter. The realized gain on the sale of MBS during the fourth quarter of 2008 was partially offset by other-than-temporary impairment charges of $4.8 million related to auto industry corporate bonds and certain equity securities. Other-than-temporary impairmentThere were no other-than- temporary impairments charges on investment securities amounted to $0.7 million forduring the fourth quarter of 2007.2009.
 
  The provision for loan and lease losses amounted to $137.3 million, or 170% of net charge-offs, for the fourth quarter of 2009 compared to $48.5 million, or 172% of net charge-offs, for the fourth quarter of 2008 compared to $36.8 million, or 153% of net charge-offs, for the fourth quarter of 2007.2008. The increase, as compared to the fourth quarter of 2007, is2008, was mainly attributable to the significant increase in delinquency levels andnon-performing loans, increases in specific reserves for impaired commercial and construction loans, adversely impacted by deteriorating economic conditions in the United States and Puerto Rico. Also, increases to reserve factors for potential losses inherent in the loan portfolio, higher reserves for the

119


residential mortgage loan portfolio in the U.S. mainland and Puerto Rico and the overall growth of the Corporation’s loan portfolioportfolio. Also, the migration of loans to higher risk categories and increases to loss factors used to determine the general reserve allowance contributed to the higher chargesprovision. The increase in 2008.loss factors was necessary to account for higher charge-offs and delinquency levels as well as for worsening trends in economic conditions in Puerto Rico and the United States.
 
  Non-interest expenses increased 9%2% to $87.0$88.8 million from $80.1$87.0 million for the fourth quarter of 2007. This2008. The increase isin the non-interest expense for the fourth quarter 2009, as compared to prior year’s fourth quarter, was principally attributable to an increase of $11.5 million in the FDIC deposit insurance premium, which was partly related to increases in regular assessment rates by the FDIC in 2009. The aforementioned increase was partially offset by decreases in certain expenses such as: (i) a higher$5.3 million decrease in employees’ compensation and benefit expenses, due to a lower headcount and reductions in bonuses, incentive compensation and overtime costs, and (ii) a $4.5 million decrease in net loss on REO operations, that increased by approximately $8.0 millionmainly due to $9.3 million for the fourth quarter of 2008 as compared to $1.3 million for the fourth quarter of 2007, partially offset by lower professional service feeswrite-downs and business promotion expenses and a decrease in employee compensation and benefit expenses. The increase in REO operations losses was driven by declining real estate prices, mainly in the U.S. mainland, that have caused write-downs on the value of repossessed properties. Partially offsetting higher losses on REO operations was a decrease of $1.2 million in professional service fees, a decrease of $0.8 million in business promotion expenses and a decrease of $1.7 million in employees’ compensation and benefit expenses.mainland.
     Contrary to positive comparisons against 2007 results, a compression in net interest margin was observed in the fourth quarter of 2008, compared to the previous trailing quarter ended on September 30, 2008, mainly associated with a higher overall cost of funding. Net interest income of $124.2 million for the fourth quarter of 2008 decreased by $20.4 million compared to the third quarter of 2008. The Corporation, in managing its asset/liability position in order to limit the effects of changes in interest rates on net interest income, has been reducing its exposure to high levels of market volatility by, among other things, extending the duration of its borrowings and replacing swapped-to-floating brokered CDs that matured or were called (due to lower short-term rates) with brokered CDs not hedged with interest rate swaps at higher current spreads. Also, the Corporation has reduced its interest rate risk through other funding sources and by, among other things, entering into long-term and structured repurchase agreements that replaced short-term borrowings. The interest rate risk management strategy contributed in part to an increase in the overall cost of funding of 22 basis points, from 3.53% to 3.75%, even though market interest rates declined in the fourth quarter of 2008, but left the Corporation better positioned for possible adverse changes in interest rates in the future. Also contributing to the higher cost of funds is the fact that new brokered CDs issued during the fourth quarter carry a fixed-interest rate set on a wider spread over LIBOR than the spread of interest rate swaps that hedged the brokered CDs replaced. The volume of swapped-to-floating brokered CDs has decreased by $397 million since the end of the third quarter of 2008 and approximately $3.0 billion to $1.1 billion as of December 31, 2008 from $4.1 billion a year ago. The Corporation has taken initial steps to mitigate this anticipated increase in the cost of funding with a higher pricing on its variable-rate commercial loan portfolio; however, this effort was severely impacted by significant declines in short-term rates during the quarter (the Prime Rate dropped to 3.25% from 5.00% and 3-month LIBOR closed at 1.43% on December 31, 2008 from 4.05% on September 30, 2008) and, to an extent, by the increase in the volume of non-performing loans. The weighted-average yield of loans on a tax equivalent basis decreased from 6.62% to 6.57%.
     The Corporation expects the overall cost of funds to decrease in the first quarter of 2009. The main reasons supporting the lower costs expectation are: the reduction of the high level of liquidity that has been maintained in the fourth quarter of 2008 amid the liquidity crisis in the capital markets, the lower interest rates in absolute terms in the current rate environment and expectations to remain at relatively low levels throughout the first quarter, and lower short-term brokered CDs rate spreads over LIBOR rates, which have been tightening since the turn of the year. The Corporation expects to refinance approximately $1.4 billion of $1.9 billion brokered CDs maturing, or that could be redeemed in the first quarter of 2009 with various sources of funding, including advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank and for the Federal Reserve Bank, brokered CDs, repurchase agreements and core deposits.
     Some infrequent transactions that affected quarterly periods shown in the above table include: (i) recognition of non-cash charges of approximately $152.2 million to increase the valuation allowance for the Corporation’s deferred tax asset in the third quarter of 2009; (ii) the ecording of $8.9 million in the second quarter of 2009 for the accrual of the special assessment levied by the FDIC; (iii) the impairment of the core deposit intangible of FirstBank Florida for $4.0 million recorded in the first quarter of 2009; (iv) the reversal of $10.8 million of UTBs and related accrued interest of $3.5 million during the second quarter of 2009 for positions taken on income taxes returns due to the lapse of the statute of limitations for the 2004 taxable year; (v) the reversal of $2.9 million of UTBs, net of a payment made to the Puerto Rico Department of Treasury, in connection with the conclusion of an income tax audit related to the 2005, 2006, 2007 and 2008 taxable years; (vi) the reversal of $10.6 million of UTBs during the second quarter of 2008 for positions taken on income tax returns recorded under the provisions of FIN 48 due to the lapse of the statute of limitations for the 2003; (ii)2003 taxable year; (vii) the gain of $9.3 million on the mandatory redemption of a portion of the Corporation’s investment in VISA as part of VISA’s IPO in the first quarter of 2008 and (viii) the income tax benefit of $5.4 million also recorded in the first quarter of 2008 in connection with an agreement entered into with the Puerto Rico Department of Treasury that established a multi-year allocation schedule for deductibility of the $74.25 million payment made by the Corporation during 2007 to settle a securities class action suit; (iii) the income recognition of approximately $15.1 million in the third quarter of 2007 for reimbursement of expenses, mainly from insurance carriers, related to the settlement of the class action lawsuit brought against the Corporation; and (iv) the gain of $2.8 million on the sale of a credit card portfolio and of $2.5 million on the partial extinguishment and recharacterization of a secured commercial loan to a local financial institution recorded in the first quarter of 2007.suit.

120


Changes in Internal Controls over Financial Reporting
Refer to Item 9A.
       CEO and CFO Certifications
     First BanCorp’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission the certifications required by Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 as Exhibit 31.1 and 31.2 to this Annual Report on Form 10-K and the certifications required by Section III(b)(4) of the Emergency Stabilization Act of 2008 as Exhibit 99.1 and 99.2 to this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

137


     In addition, in 2008,2009, First BanCorp’s Chief Executive Officer certified to the New York Stock Exchange that he was not aware of any violation by the Corporation of the NYSE corporate governance listing standards.
Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
     The information required herein is incorporated by reference to the information included under the sub caption “Interest Rate Risk Management” in the Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations section in this Form 10-K.
Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data
     The consolidated financial statements of First BanCorp, together with the report thereon of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, First BanCorp’s independent registered public accounting firm, are included herein beginning on page F-1 of this Form 10-K.
Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure
     None.

121


Item 9A. Controls and Procedures
Disclosure Controls and Procedures
     First BanCorp’s management, under the supervision and with the participation of its Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, has evaluated the effectiveness of First BanCorp’s disclosure controls and procedures as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) promulgated under the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act), as of the end of the period covered by this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Based on this evaluation, our CEO and CFO concluded that, as of December 31, 2008,2009, the Corporation’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective and provide reasonable assurance that the information required to be disclosed by the Corporation in reports that the Corporation files or submits under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in SEC rules and forms and is accumulated and reported to the Corporation’s management, including the CEO and CFO, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting
     Our management’s report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting is set forth in Item 8 and incorporated herein by reference.
     The effectiveness of the Corporation’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 20082009 has been audited by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, as stated in their report as set forth in Item 8.
Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
     There have been no changes to the Corporation’s internal control over financial reporting during our most recent quarter ended December 31, 20082009 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Corporation’s internal control over financial reporting.
Item 9B. Other Information.
     None.

122138


PART III
Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance
     Information in response to this Item is incorporated herein by reference to the sections entitled “Information with Respect to Nominees for Director of First BanCorp and Executive Officers of the Corporation,” “Corporate Governance and Related Matters” and “Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance” contained in First BanCorp’s definitive Proxy Statement for use in connection with its 20092010 Annual Meeting of stockholders (the “Proxy Statement”) to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission within 120 days of the close of First BanCorp’s 20082009 fiscal year.
Item 11. Executive Compensation
     Information in response to this Item is incorporated herein by reference to the sections entitled “Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation,” “Compensation of Directors,” “Compensation Discussion and Analysis,” “Compensation Committee Report” and “Tabular Executive Compensation Disclosure” in First BanCorp’s Proxy Statement.
Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters
     Information in response to this Item is incorporated herein by reference to the section entitled “Beneficial Ownership of Securities” in First BanCorp’s Proxy Statement.
Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence
     Information in response to this Item is incorporated herein by reference to the sections entitled “Certain Relationships and Related Person Transactions” and “Corporate Governance and Related Matters” in First BanCorp’s Proxy Statement.
Item 14. Principal Accountant Fees and Services.
     Information in response to this Item is incorporated herein by reference to the section entitled “Audit Fees” in First BanCorp’s Proxy Statement.
PART IV
Item 15. Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules
(a) List of documents filed as part of this report.
              (1)Financial Statements.
          The following consolidated financial statements of First BanCorp, together with the report thereon of First BanCorp’s independent registered public accounting firm, PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, dated March 2, 2009,1, 2010, are included herein beginning on page F-1:
  Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm.
 
  Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition as of December 31, 20082009 and 2007.2008.
 
  Consolidated Statements of (Loss) Income for Each of the Three Years in the Period Ended December 31, 2008.2009.

139


  Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity for Each of the Three Years in the Period Ended December 31, 2008.2009.

123


  Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive (Loss) Income for each of the Three Years in the Period Ended December 31, 2008.2009.
 
  Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for Each of the Three Years in the Period Ended December 31, 2008.2009.
 
  Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
     (2) Financial statement schedules.
     All financial schedules have been omitted because they are not applicable or the required information is shown in the financial statements or notes thereto.
     (3) Exhibits listed below are filed herewith as part of this Form 10-K or are incorporated herein by reference.
Index to Exhibits:
   
No. Exhibit
3.1 Articles of Incorporation (1)
   
3.2 By-Laws of First BanCorp (1)
   
3.3 Certificate of Designation creating the 7.125% non-cumulative perpetual monthly income preferred stock, Series A (1)(2)
   
3.4 Certificate of Designation creating the 8.35% non-cumulative perpetual monthly income preferred stock, Series B (2)(3)
   
3.5 Certificate of Designation creating the 7.40% non-cumulative perpetual monthly income preferred stock, Series C (3)(4)
   
3.6 Certificate of Designation creating the 7.25% non-cumulative perpetual monthly income preferred stock, Series D (4)(5)
   
3.7 Certificate of Designation creating the 7.00% non-cumulative perpetual monthly income preferred stock, Series E (5)(6)
   
3.8 Certificate of Designation creating the fixed-rate cumulative perpetual preferred stock, Series F (6)
3.9Warrant dated January 16, 2009 to purchase shares of First BanCorp (7)
   
4.0 Form of Common Stock Certificate (8)Certificate(9)
   
4.1 Form of Stock Certificate for 7.125% non-cumulative perpetual monthly income preferred stock, Series A (1)(2)
   
4.2 Form of Stock Certificate for 8.35% non-cumulative perpetual monthly income preferred stock, Series B (2)(3)
   
4.3 Form of Stock Certificate for 7.40% non-cumulative perpetual monthly income preferred stock, Series C (3)(4)
   
4.4 Form of Stock Certificate for 7.25% non-cumulative perpetual monthly income preferred stock, Series D (4)(5)
   
4.5 Form of Stock Certificate for 7.00% non-cumulative perpetual monthly income preferred stock, Series E (9)(10)
   
4.6 Form of Stock Certificate for Fixed Rate Cumulative Perpetual Preferred Stock, Series F (1)
4.7Warrant dated January 16, 2009 to purchase shares of First BanCorp (8)
4.8Letter Agreement, dated January 16, 2009, including Securities Purchase Agreement — Standard Terms attached thereto as Exhibit A, between First BanCorp and the United States Department of the Treasury (14)
   
10.1 FirstBank’s 19871997 Stock Option Plan (10)Plan(11)
   
10.2 FirstBank’s 1997 Stock Option Plan (10)
10.3First BanCorp’s 2008 Omnibus Incentive Plan (11)
10.4Investment agreement between The Bank of Nova Scotia and First BanCorp dated as of February 15, 2007 (12)
10.5Purchase Agreement dated as of January 16, 2009 between First BanCorp and the United States Department of the Treasury (13)Plan(12)

124140


   
No. Exhibit
10.610.3Investment agreement between The Bank of Nova Scotia and First BanCorp dated February 15, 2007, including the Form of Stockholder Agreement(13)
10.4 Employment Agreement — Luis M. Beauchamp (10)– Aurelio Alemán(11)
10.5Amendment No. 1 to Employment Agreement – Aurelio Alemán(15)
10.6Amendment No. 2 to Employment Agreement – Aurelio Alemán
   
10.7 Employment Agreement — Aurelio Alemán (10)– Randolfo Rivera(11)
   
10.8 Amendment No. 1 to Employment Agreement Randolfo Rivera (10)(15)
   
10.9 Amendment No. 2 to Employment Agreement — Lawrence Odell (14)– Randolfo Rivera
   
10.10 Amendment to Employment Agreement Lawrence Odell (14)Odell(16)
   
10.11 Amendment No. 1 to Employment Agreement — Fernando Scherrer (14)– Lawrence Odell(16)
   
10.12 ServiceAmendment No. 2 to Employment Agreement Martinez Odell & Calabria (14)– Lawrence Odell(15)
   
10.13 Amendment No. 3 to Employment Agreement – Lawrence Odell
10.14Employment Agreement – Orlando Berges(17)
10.15Service Agreement Martinez Odell & Calabria(16)
10.16Amendment No. 1 to Service Agreement Martinez Odell & Calabria(16)
10.17Amendment No. 2 to Service Agreement Martinez Odell & Calabria (14)
12.1Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges and Preference Dividends
   
14.1 Code of Ethics for CEO and Senior Financial Officers
14.2Policy Statement and Standards of Conduct for Members of Board of Directors, Executive Officers and Principal Shareholders(15)
14.3Independence Principles for Directors of First BanCorp (16) (1)
   
21.1 List of First BanCorp’s subsidiaries
   
31.1 Section 302 Certification of the CEO
   
31.2 Section 302 Certification of the CFO
   
32.1 Section 906 Certification of the CEO
   
32.2 Section 906 Certification of the CFO
99.1Certification of the CEO Pursuant to Section III(b)(4) of the Emergency Stabilization Act of 2008 and 31 CFR § 30.15
99.2Certification of the CFO Pursuant to Section III(b)(4) of the Emergency Stabilization Act of 2008 and 31 CFR § 30.15
99.3Policy Statement and Standards of Conduct for Members of Board of Directors, Executive Officers and Principal Shareholders(18)
99.4Independence Principles for Directors of First BanCorp (19)
 
(1)Incorporated by reference from the Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008 filed by the Corporation on March 2, 2009.
(2) Incorporated by reference to First BanCorp’s registration statement on Form S-3 filed by the Corporation on March 30, 1999.
 
(2)(3) Incorporated by reference to First BanCorp’s registration statement on Form S-3 filed by the Corporation on September 8, 2000.
 
(3)(4) Incorporated by reference to First BanCorp’s registration statement on Form S-3 filed by the Corporation on May 18, 2001.
 
(4)(5) Incorporated by reference to First BanCorp’s registration statement on Form S-3/A filed by the Corporation on January 16, 2002.

141


(5)(6) Incorporated by reference to Form 8-A filed by the Corporation on September 26, 2003.
 
(6)(7) Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 from the Form 8-K filed by the Corporation on January 20, 2009.
 
(7)(8) Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 from the Form 8-K filed by the Corporation on January 20, 2009.
 
(8)(9) Incorporated by reference from Registration statement on Form S-4 filed by the Corporation on April 15, 1998.1998
 
(9)(10) Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 from the Form 8-K filed by the Corporation on September 5, 2003.
 
(10)(11) Incorporated by reference from the Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1998 filed by the Corporation on March 26, 1999.
 
(11)(12) Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 from the Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2008 filed by the Corporation on May 12, 2008.
 
(12)(13) Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.110.01 from the Form 8-K filed by the Corporation on February 22, 2007.
 
(13)(14) Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 from the Form 8-K filed by the Corporation on January 20, 2009.

125


(14)(15)Incorporated by reference from the Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2009 filed by the Corporation on May 11, 2009.
(16) Incorporated by reference from the Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005 filed by the Corporation on February 9, 2007.
 
(15)(17)Incorporated by reference from the Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2009 filed by the Corporation on August 11, 2009.
(18) Incorporated by reference from the Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003 filed by the Corporation on March 15, 2004.
 
(16)(19) Incorporated by reference from the Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007 filed by the Corporation on February 29, 2008.

126142


SIGNATURES
     Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 the Corporation has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned hereunto duly authorized.
     
FIRST BANCORP.
     
By: /s/ Luis M. BeauchampAurelio Alemán Date: 3/2/091/10
  
Luis M. Beauchamp, Chairman,
Aurelio Alemán
  
  President and Chief Executive Officer  
     Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
     
/s/ Luis M. Beauchamp
Luis M. Beauchamp
Aurelio Alemán
   Date: 3/2/091/10
Chairman,
Aurelio Alemán
    
President and Chief Executive Officer    
     
/s/ Aurelio Alemán
Aurelio Alemán
Orlando Berges
   Date: 3/2/09
Senior Executive Vice President and
Chief Operating Officer
1/10
/s/ Fernando Scherrer
 
Fernando Scherrer,Orlando Berges, CPA
   Date: 3/2/09
Executive Vice President and    
Chief Financial Officer    
     
/s/ José Menéndez-CortadaDate: 3/1/10
José Menéndez-Cortada, Director and
Chairman of the Board
/s/ Fernando Rodríguez-AmaroDate: 3/1/10
 
Fernando Rodríguez Amaro,
   Date: 3/2/09
Director    
     
/s/ Jorge L. Díaz
Date: 3/1/10
 
Jorge L. Díaz, Director
   Date: 3/2/09
     
/s/ Sharee Ann Umpierre-Catinchi
Date: 3/1/10
 
Sharee Ann Umpierre-Catinchi,
   Date: 3/2/09
Director    
     
/s/ José Teixidor
José Teixidor, Director
L. Ferrer-Canals
   Date: 3/2/09
1/10
/s/ José L. Ferrer-Canals
 
José L. Ferrer-Canals, Director
Date: 3/2/09
/s/ José Menéndez-Cortada
José Menéndez-Cortada, Lead
Date: 3/2/09
Director    
     
/s/ Frank Kolodziej
Date: 3/1/10
 
Frank Kolodziej, Director
   Date: 3/2/09
     
/s/ Héctor M. Nevares
Date: 3/1/10
 
Héctor M. Nevares, Director
   Date: 3/2/09

127143


     
/s/ José F. Rodríguez
Date: 3/1/10
 
José F. Rodríguez, Director
   Date: 3/2/09
     
/s/ Pedro Romero
 
Pedro Romero, CPA
   Date: 3/2/091/10 
Senior Vice President and    
Chief Accounting Officer    

128144



Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of First BanCorp:
     The management of First BanCorp (the Corporation) is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and for our assessment of internal control over financial reporting. The Corporation’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”) and includes controls over the preparation of financial statements in accordance with the instructions for the Consolidated Financial Statements for Bank Holding Companies (Form FR Y-9C) to comply with the requirements of Section 112 of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation Improvement Act (FDICIA).
     Internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (i) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (ii) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit the preparation of financial statements in accordance with GAAP, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
     Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
     The management of First BanCorp has assessed the effectiveness of the Corporation’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2008.2009. In making this assessment, the Corporation used the criteria set forth by the Committee of the Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) in Internal Control-Integrated Framework.
     Based on our assessment, management concluded that the Corporation maintained effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2008.2009.
     The effectiveness of the Corporation’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2008,2009 has been audited by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, as stated in their report which appears herein.
     
  
/s/ Luis M. Beauchamp
Luis M. Beauchamp
Aurelio Alemán   
 Chairman of the Board, PresidentAurelio Alemán  
 President and Chief Executive Officer  
   
/s/ Orlando Berges  
 /s/  Fernando Scherrer
Fernando Scherrer
Orlando Berges  
 Executive Vice President
and Chief Financial Officer  

F-1


PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
254 Muñoz Rivera Avenue
BBVA Tower, 9th Floor
Hato Rey, PR 00918
Telephone (787) 754-9090
Facsimile (787) 766-1094
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
To the Board of Directors and
Stockholders of First BanCorp
In our opinion, the accompanying consolidated statements of financial condition and the related consolidated statements of (loss) income, comprehensive (loss) income, changes in stockholders’ equity and cash flows present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of First BanCorp and its subsidiaries (the “Corporation”) at December 31, 20082009 and 2007,2008, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 20082009 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Also in our opinion, the Corporation maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2008,2009, based on criteria established inInternal Control - Integrated Frameworkissued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). The Corporation’s management is responsible for these financial statements, for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express opinions on these financial statements and on the Corporation’s internal control over financial reporting based on our integrated audits. We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement and whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audits of the financial statements included examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. Our audit of internal control over financial reporting included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audits also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinions.
As discussed in Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements, the Corporation adopted in 2007 Financial Accounting Standards Board Interpretation No. 48, “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes — an Interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109”, Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 157, “Fair Value Measurements” and Statement of Financial Accounting Standard No. 159, “The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Liabilities Including an amendment of FASB Statement No. 115”. In addition, the Corporation changed the manner in which it accounts for share-based compensationuncertain tax positions and the manner in 2006.which it accounts for the financial assets and liabilities at fair value in 2007.
A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. Management’s assessment and our audit of First BanCorp’s internal control over financial reporting also included controls over the preparation of financial statements in accordance with the instructions to the Consolidated Financial Statements for Bank Holding Companies (Form FR Y-9C) to comply with the reporting requirements of Section 112 of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation Improvement Act (FDICIA). A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (i) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (ii) provide reasonable assurance that

F-2


transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

F-2


Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

San Juan, Puerto Rico
March 2, 20091, 2010
CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS
(OF PUERTO RICO)
License No. 216 Expires Dec. 1, 2010
Stamp 23871942389662 of the P.R. Society of
Certified Public Accountants has been
Affixedaffixed to the file copy of this report

F-3


FIRST BANCORP

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
                
(In thousands, except for share information) December 31, 2008 December 31, 2007 
 December 31, 2009 December 31, 2008 
 (In thousands, except for share information) 
ASSETS
  
 
Cash and due from banks $329,730 $195,809  $679,798 $329,730 
          
  
Money market investments:  
Federal funds sold 54,469 7,957  1,140 54,469 
Time deposits with other financial institutions 600 26,600  600 600 
Other short-term investments 20,934 148,579  22,546 20,934 
          
Total money market investments 76,003 183,136  24,286 76,003 
          
Investment securities available for sale, at fair value:  
Securities pledged that can be repledged 2,913,721 789,271  3,021,028 2,913,721 
Other investment securities 948,621 497,015  1,149,754 948,621 
          
Total investment securities available for sale 3,862,342 1,286,286  4,170,782 3,862,342 
          
Investment securities held to maturity, at amortized cost:  
Securities pledged that can be repledged 968,389 2,522,509  400,925 968,389 
Other investment securities 738,275 754,574  200,694 738,275 
          
Total investment securities held to maturity, fair value of $1,720,412(2007 - $3,261,934) 1,706,664 3,277,083 
Total investment securities held to maturity, fair value of $621,584 (2008 - $1,720,412) 601,619 1,706,664 
          
Other equity securities 64,145 64,908  69,930 64,145 
          
  
Loans, net of allowance for loan and lease losses of $281,526(2007 – $190,168) 12,796,363 11,588,654 
Loans, net of allowance for loan and lease losses of $528,120 (2008 - $281,526) 13,400,331 12,796,363 
Loans held for sale, at lower of cost or market 10,403 20,924  20,775 10,403 
          
Total loans, net 12,806,766 11,609,578  13,421,106 12,806,766 
          
Premises and equipment, net 178,468 162,635  197,965 178,468 
Other real estate owned 37,246 16,116  69,304 37,246 
Accrued interest receivable on loans and investments 98,565 107,979  79,867 98,565 
Due from customers on acceptances 504 747  954 504 
Other assets 330,835 282,654  312,837 330,835 
          
Total assets $19,491,268 $17,186,931  $19,628,448 $19,491,268 
          
  
LIABILITIES
  
  
Deposits:  
Non-interest-bearing deposits $625,928 $621,884  $697,022 $625,928 
Interest-bearing deposits (including $1,150,959 and $4,186,563 measured at fair value as of December 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007, respectively) 12,431,502 10,412,637 
Interest-bearing deposits (including $0 and $1,150,959 measured at fair value as of December 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively) 11,972,025 12,431,502 
          
Total deposits 13,057,430 11,034,521  12,669,047 13,057,430 
Federal funds purchased and securities sold under agreements to repurchase 3,421,042 3,094,646 
 
Loans payable 900,000  
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase 3,076,631 3,421,042 
Advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank (FHLB) 1,060,440 1,103,000  978,440 1,060,440 
Notes payable (including $10,141 and $14,306 measured at fair value as of December 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007, respectively) 23,274 30,543 
Notes payable (including $13,361 and $10,141 measured at fair value as of December 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively) 27,117 23,274 
Other borrowings 231,914 231,817  231,959 231,914 
Bank acceptances outstanding 504 747  954 504 
Accounts payable and other liabilities 148,547 270,011  145,237 148,547 
          
Total liabilities 17,943,151 15,765,285  18,029,385 17,943,151 
          
  
Commitments and contingencies (Notes 26, 29 and 32) 
Commitments and contingencies (Notes 28, 31 and 34) 
  
STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
  
Preferred stock, authorized 50,000,000 shares: issued and outstanding 22,004,000 shares at $25 liquidation value per share 550,100 550,100 
Preferred stock, authorized 50,000,000 shares: issued and outstanding 22,404,000 shares (2008 - 22,004,000) at an aggregate liquidation value of $950,100 (2008 - $550,100) 928,508 550,100 
          
Common stock, $1 par value, authorized 250,000,000 shares; issued 102,444,549 as of December 31, 2008 (2007 – 102,402,306) 102,444 102,402 
Less: Treasury stock (at par value)  (9,898)  (9,898)
Common stock, $1 par value, authorized 250,000,000 shares; issued 102,440,522 (2008 - 102,444,549) 102,440 102,444 
Less: Treasury stock (at cost)  (9,898)  (9,898)
          
Common stock outstanding, 92,546,749 as of December 31, 2008 (2007 – 92,504,506) 92,546 92,504 
Common stock outstanding, 92,542,722 shares outstanding (2008 - 92,546,749) 92,542 92,546 
          
Additional paid-in capital 108,299 108,279  134,223 108,299 
Legal surplus 299,006 286,049  299,006 299,006 
Retained earnings 440,777 409,978  118,291 440,777 
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax expense (benefit) of $717 (2007 - ($227)) 57,389  (25,264)
Accumulated other comprehensive income, net of tax expense of $4,628 (2008 - $717) 26,493 57,389 
          
Total stockholders’ equity 1,548,117 1,421,646  1,599,063 1,548,117 
          
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity $19,491,268 $17,186,931  $19,628,448 $19,491,268 
          
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.

F-4


FIRST BANCORP

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF (LOSS) INCOME
                        
 Year Ended December 31,  Year Ended December 31, 
 2008 2007 2006  2009 2008 2007 
 (In thousands, except per share data)  (In thousands, except per share data) 
Interest income:
  
Loans $835,501 $901,941 $936,052  $741,535 $835,501 $901,941 
Investment securities 285,041 265,275 281,847  254,462 285,041 265,275 
Money market investments 6,355 22,031 70,914  577 6,355 22,031 
              
Total interest income 1,126,897 1,189,247 1,288,813  996,574 1,126,897 1,189,247 
              
  
Interest expense:
  
Deposits 414,838 528,740 605,033  314,487 414,838 528,740 
Loans payable 243    2,331 243  
Federal funds purchased and securities sold under agreements to repurchase 133,690 148,309 195,328  114,651 133,690 148,309 
Advances from FHLB 39,739 38,464 13,704  32,954 39,739 38,464 
Notes payable and other borrowings 10,506 22,718 31,054  13,109 10,506 22,718 
              
Total interest expense 599,016 738,231 845,119  477,532 599,016 738,231 
              
Net interest income 527,881 451,016 443,694  519,042 527,881 451,016 
              
  
Provision for loan and lease losses
 190,948 120,610 74,991  579,858 190,948 120,610 
              
  
Net interest income after provision for loan and lease losses 336,933 330,406 368,703 
Net interest (loss) income after provision for loan and lease losses  (60,816) 336,933 330,406 
              
  
Non-interest income:
  
Other service charges on loans 6,309 6,893 5,945  6,830 6,309 6,893 
Service charges on deposit accounts 12,895 12,769 12,591  13,307 12,895 12,769 
Mortgage banking activities 3,273 2,819 2,259  8,605 3,273 2,819 
Net gain (loss) on investments and impairments 21,193  (2,726)  (8,194)
Net gain (loss) on partial extinguishment and recharacterization of secured commercial loans to local financial institutions  2,497  (10,640)
Net gain on sale of investments 86,804 27,180 3,184 
Other-than-temporary impairment losses on investment securities: 
Total other-than-temporary impairment losses  (33,400)  (5,987)  (5,910)
Noncredit-related impairment portion on debt securities not expected to be sold (recognized in other comprehensive income) 31,742   
       
Net impairment losses on investment securities  (1,658)  (5,987)  (5,910)
Net gain on partial extinguishment and recharacterization of a secured commercial loan to a local financial institutions   2,497 
Rental income 2,246 2,538 3,264  1,346 2,246 2,538 
Gain on sale of credit card portfolio  2,819 500    2,819 
Insurance reimbursements and other agreements related to a contingency settlement  15,075     15,075 
Other non-interest income 28,727 24,472 25,611  27,030 28,727 24,472 
              
Total non-interest income 74,643 67,156 31,336  142,264 74,643 67,156 
              
  
Non-interest expenses:
  
Employees’ compensation and benefits 141,853 140,363 127,523  132,734 141,853 140,363 
Occupancy and equipment 61,818 58,894 54,440  62,335 61,818 58,894 
Business promotion 17,565 18,029 17,672  14,158 17,565 18,029 
Professional fees 15,809 20,751 32,095  15,217 15,809 20,751 
Taxes, other than income taxes 16,989 15,364 12,428  15,847 16,989 15,364 
Insurance and supervisory fees 15,990 12,616 7,067  45,605 15,990 12,616 
Net loss on real estate owned (REO) operations 21,373 2,400 18  21,863 21,373 2,400 
Other non-interest expenses 41,974 39,426 36,720  44,342 41,974 39,426 
              
Total non-interest expenses 333,371 307,843 287,963  352,101 333,371 307,843 
              
(Loss) income before income taxes
  (270,653) 78,205 89,719 
Income tax (expense) benefit
  (4,534) 31,732  (21,583)
        
Income before income taxes
 78,205 89,719 112,076 
Income tax benefit (provision)
 31,732  (21,583)  (27,442)
Net (loss) income
 $(275,187) $109,937 $68,136 
              
Preferred stock dividends and accretion of discount
 46,888 40,276 40,276 
        
Net income
 $109,937 $68,136 $84,634 
Net (loss) income attributable to common stockholders
 $(322,075) $69,661 $27,860 
              
Dividends to preferred stockholders 40,276 40,276 40,276 
       
Net income attributable to common stockholders
 $69,661 $27,860 $44,358 
       
Net income per common share:
 
Net (loss) income per common share:
 
Basic $0.75 $0.32 $0.54  $(3.48) $0.75 $0.32 
              
Diluted $0.75 $0.32 $0.53  $(3.48) $0.75 $0.32 
              
Dividends declared per common share
 $0.28 $0.28 $0.28  $0.14 $0.28 $0.28 
              
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.

F-5


FIRST BANCORP

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
                        
 Year Ended December 31,  Year Ended December 31, 
 2008 2007 2006  2009 2008 2007 
 (In thousands)  (In thousands) 
Cash flows from operating activities:
  
Net income $109,937 $68,136 $84,634 
Net (loss) income $(275,187) $109,937 $68,136 
              
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities: 
Adjustments to reconcile net (loss) income to net cash provided by operating activities: 
Depreciation 19,172 17,669 16,810  20,774 19,172 17,669 
Amortization of core deposit intangibles 3,603 3,294 3,385 
Amortization and impairment of core deposit intangible 7,386 3,603 3,294 
Provision for loan and lease losses 190,948 120,610 74,991  579,858 190,948 120,610 
Deferred income tax (benefit) provision  (38,853) 13,658  (31,715)
Deferred income tax expense (benefit) 16,054  (38,853) 13,658 
Stock-based compensation recognized 9 2,848 5,380  92 9 2,848 
Gain on sale of investments, net  (27,180)  (3,184)  (7,057)  (86,804)  (27,180)  (3,184)
Other-than-temporary impairments on available-for-sale securities 5,987 5,910 15,251  1,658 5,987 5,910 
Derivative instruments and hedging activities (gain) loss  (26,425) 6,134 61,820   (15,745)  (26,425) 6,134 
Net gain on sale of loans and impairments  (2,617)  (2,246)  (1,690)  (7,352)  (2,617)  (2,246)
Net (gain) loss on partial extinguishment and recharacterization of secured commercial loans to local financial institutions   (2,497) 10,640 
Net gain on partial extinguishment and recharacterization of a secured commercial loan to a local financial institution    (2,497)
Net amortization of premiums and discounts and deferred loan fees and costs  (1,083)  (663)  (2,568) 606  (1,083)  (663)
Net increase in mortgage loans held for sale  (6,194)     (21,208)  (6,194)  
Amortization of broker placement fees 15,665 9,563 19,955  22,858 15,665 9,563 
Accretion of basis adjustments on fair value hedges   (2,061)  (3,626)    (2,061)
Net accretion of premium and discounts on investment securities  (7,828)  (42,026)  (35,933)
Net amortization (accretion) of premium and discounts on investment securities 5,221  (7,828)  (42,026)
Gain on sale of credit card portfolio   (2,819)  (500)    (2,819)
Decrease in accrued income tax payable  (13,348)  (3,419)  (39,702)  (19,408)  (13,348)  (3,419)
Decrease (increase) in accrued interest receivable 9,611 4,397  (8,813)
(Decrease) increase in accrued interest payable  (31,030)  (13,808) 33,910 
(Increase) decrease in other assets  (14,959) 4,408 12,089 
(Decrease) increase in other liabilities  (9,501)  (123,611) 14,451 
Decrease in accrued interest receivable 18,699 9,611 4,397 
Decrease in accrued interest payable  (24,194)  (31,030)  (13,808)
Decrease (increase) in other assets 28,609  (14,959) 4,408 
Decrease in other liabilities  (8,668)  (9,501)  (123,611)
              
Total adjustments 65,977  (7,843) 137,078  518,436 65,977  (7,843)
       
        
Net cash provided by operating activities 175,914 60,293 221,712  243,249 175,914 60,293 
              
  
Cash flows from investing activities:
  
Principal collected on loans 2,588,979 3,084,530 6,022,633  3,010,435 2,588,979 3,084,530 
Loans originated  (3,796,234)  (3,813,644)  (4,718,928)  (4,429,644)  (3,796,234)  (3,813,644)
Purchases of loans  (419,068)  (270,499)  (168,662)
Purchase of loans  (190,431)  (419,068)  (270,499)
Proceeds from sale of loans 154,068 150,707 169,422  43,816 154,068 150,707 
Proceeds from sale of repossessed assets 76,517 52,768 50,896  78,846 76,517 52,768 
Purchases of servicing assets  (621)  (1,851)  (1,156)
Purchase of servicing assets   (621)  (1,851)
Proceeds from sale of available-for-sale securities 679,955 959,212 232,483  1,946,434 679,955 959,212 
Purchases of securities held to maturity  (8,540)  (511,274)  (447,483)  (8,460)  (8,540)  (511,274)
Purchases of securities available for sale  (3,468,093)  (576,100)  (225,373)  (2,781,394)  (3,468,093)  (576,100)
Principal repayments and maturities of securities held to maturity 1,586,799 623,374 574,797 
Principal repayments of securities available for sale 332,419 214,218 217,828 
Proceeds from principal repayments and maturities of securities held to maturity 1,110,245 1,586,799 623,374 
Proceeds from principal repayments of securities available for sale 880,384 332,419 214,218 
Additions to premises and equipment  (32,830)  (24,642)  (55,524)  (40,271)  (32,830)  (24,642)
Proceeds from redemption of other investment securities 9,474   
Decrease (increase) in other equity securities 875  (23,422) 2,208 
Proceeds from sale/redemption of other investment securities 4,032 9,474  
(Increase) decrease in other equity securities  (5,785) 875  (23,422)
Net cash inflow on acquisition of business 5,154     5,154  
              
Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities  (2,291,146)  (136,623) 1,653,141 
Net cash used in investing activities  (381,793)  (2,291,146)  (136,623)
              
  
Cash flows from financing activities:
  
Net increase (decrease) in deposits 1,924,312 59,499  (1,550,714)
Net increase (decrease) in federal funds purchased and securities sold under repurchase agreements 326,396  (593,078)  (1,146,158)
Net (decrease) increase in deposits  (393,636) 1,924,312 59,499 
Net increase in loans payable 900,000   
Net (decrease) increase in federal funds purchased and securities sold under agreements to repurchase  (344,411) 326,396  (593,078)
Net FHLB advances (paid) taken  (42,560) 543,000 54,000   (82,000)  (42,560) 543,000 
Repayments of notes payable and other borrowings   (150,000)      (150,000)
Dividends paid  (66,181)  (64,881)  (63,566)  (43,066)  (66,181)  (64,881)
Issuance of common stock  91,924     91,924 
Issuance of preferred stock and associated warrant 400,000   
Exercise of stock options 53  19,756   53  
Other financing activities 8   
              
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities 2,142,020  (113,536)  (2,686,682) 436,895 2,142,020  (113,536)
              
  
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents 26,788  (189,866)  (811,829) 298,351 26,788  (189,866)
  
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year 378,945 568,811 1,380,640  405,733 378,945 568,811 
              
  
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year $405,733 $378,945 $568,811  $704,084 $405,733 $378,945 
              
  
Cash and cash equivalents include:  
Cash and due from banks $329,730 $195,809 $112,341  $679,798 $329,730 $195,809 
Money market instruments 76,003 183,136 456,470  24,286 76,003 183,136 
              
 $405,733 $378,945 $568,811  $704,084 $405,733 $378,945 
              
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.

F-6


FIRST BANCORP

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
                        
 Year Ended December 31,  Year Ended December 31, 
 2008 2007 2006  2009 2008 2007 
 (In thousands)  (In thousands) 
Preferred Stock
 $550,100 $550,100 $550,100 
Preferred Stock:
 
Balance at beginning of year $550,100 $550,100 $550,100 
Issuance of preferred stock — Series F 400,000   
Preferred stock discount — Series F, net of accretion  (21,592)   
       
Balance at end of period 928,508 550,100 550,100 
              
  
Common Stock outstanding:
  
Balance at beginning of year 92,504 83,254 80,875  92,546 92,504 83,254 
Issuance of common stock  9,250     9,250 
Common stock issued under stock option plan 6  2,379   6  
Restricted stock grants 36     36  
Restricted stock forfeited  (4)   
              
Balance at end of year 92,546 92,504 83,254  92,542 92,546 92,504 
              
  
Additional Paid-In-Capital:
  
Balance at beginning of year 108,279 22,757   108,299 108,279 22,757 
Issuance of common stock  82,674     82,674 
Issuance of common stock warrants 25,820   
Shares issued under stock option plan 47  17,377   47  
Stock-based compensation recognized 9 2,848 5,380  92 9 2,848 
Restricted stock grants  (36)      (36)  
Restricted stock forfeited 4   
Other 8   
              
Balance at end of year 108,299 108,279 22,757  134,223 108,299 108,279 
              
  
Legal Surplus:
  
Balance at beginning of year 286,049 276,848 265,844  299,006 286,049 276,848 
Transfer from retained earnings 12,957 9,201 11,004   12,957 9,201 
              
Balance at end of year 299,006 286,049 276,848  299,006 299,006 286,049 
              
  
Retained Earnings:
  
Balance at beginning of year 409,978 326,761 316,697  440,777 409,978 326,761 
Net income 109,937 68,136 84,634 
Net (loss) income  (275,187) 109,937 68,136 
Cash dividends declared on common stock  (25,905)  (24,605)  (23,290)  (12,966)  (25,905)  (24,605)
Cash dividends declared on preferred stock  (40,276)  (40,276)  (40,276)  (30,106)  (40,276)  (40,276)
Cumulative adjustment for accounting change (adoption of FIN 48)   (2,615)  
Cumulative adjustment for accounting change (adoption of SFAS No. 159)  91,778  
Cumulative adjustment for accounting change — adoption of accounting for uncertainty in income taxes    (2,615)
Cumulative adjustment for accounting change — adoption of fair value option   91,778 
Accretion of preferred stock discount — Series F  (4,227)   
Transfer to legal surplus  (12,957)  (9,201)  (11,004)   (12,957)  (9,201)
              
Balance at end of year 440,777 409,978 326,761  118,291 440,777 409,978 
              
  
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss), net of tax:
  
Balance at beginning of year  (25,264)  (30,167)  (15,675) 57,389  (25,264)  (30,167)
Other comprehensive gain (loss), net of tax 82,653 4,903  (14,492)
Other comprehensive (loss) income, net of tax  (30,896) 82,653 4,903 
              
Balance at end of year 57,389  (25,264)  (30,167) 26,493 57,389  (25,264)
              
  
Total stockholders’ equity
 $1,548,117 $1,421,646 $1,229,553  $1,599,063 $1,548,117 $1,421,646 
              
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.

F-7


FIRST BANCORP

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE (LOSS) INCOME
             
  Year Ended December 31, 
  2008  2007  2006 
  (In thousands) 
Net income $109,937  $68,136  $84,634 
          
             
Other comprehensive gain (loss):            
Unrealized gain (loss) on securities:            
Unrealized holding gain (loss) arising during the period  95,316   2,171   (22,891)
Less: Reclassification adjustments for net (gain) loss and other-than-temporary impairments included in net income  (11,719)  2,726   8,194 
Income tax (expense) benefit related to items of other comprehensive income  (944)  6   205 
          
             
Other comprehensive gain (loss) for the period, net of tax  82,653   4,903   (14,492)
          
             
Total comprehensive income $192,590  $73,039  $70,142 
          
             
  Year Ended December 31, 
  2009  2008  2007 
  (In thousands) 
Net (loss) income $(275,187) $109,937  $68,136 
          
             
Unrealized losses on available-for-sale debt securities on which an other-than-temporary impairment has been recognized:            
             
Noncredit-related impairment portion on debt securities not expected to be sold  (31,742)      
Reclassification adjustment for other-than-temporary impairment on debt securities included in net income  1,270       
             
All other unrealized gains and losses on available-for-sale securities:            
All other unrealized holding gains arising during the period  85,871   95,316   2,171 
Reclassification adjustments for net gain included in net income  (82,772)  (17,706)  (3,184)
Reclassification adjustments for other-than-temporary impairment on equity securities  388   5,987   5,910 
             
Income tax (expense) benefit related to items of other comprehensive income  (3,911)  (944)  6 
          
             
Other comprehensive (loss) income for the year, net of tax  (30,896)  82,653   4,903 
          
             
Total comprehensive (loss) income $(306,083) $192,590  $73,039 
          
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.

F-8


FIRST BANCORP

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Note 1 — Nature of Business and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
     The accompanying financial statements have been prepared in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”) and with prevailing practices within the financial services industry.. The following is a description of First BanCorp’s (“First BanCorp” or “the Corporation”) most significant policies:
Nature of business
     First BanCorp is a publicly-owned, Puerto Rico-chartered financial holding company that is subject to regulation, supervision and examination by the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System. The Corporation is a full service provider of financial services and products with operations in Puerto Rico, the United States and the U.S. and British Virgin Islands.
     The Corporation provides a wide range of financial services for retail, commercial and institutional clients. As of December 31, 2008,2009, the Corporation controlled fourthree wholly-owned subsidiaries: FirstBank Puerto Rico (“FirstBank” or the “Bank”), FirstBank Insurance Agency, Inc.(“FirstBank Insurance Agency”), and Grupo Empresas de Servicios Financieros (d/b/a “PR Finance Group”) and Ponce General Corporation (“Ponce General”). FirstBank is a Puerto Rico-chartered commercial bank, FirstBank Insurance Agency is a Puerto Rico-chartered insurance agency and PR Finance Group is a domestic corporation and Ponce General is the holding company of a federally chartered stock savings and loan association in Florida (USA), FirstBank Florida.corporation. FirstBank is subject to the supervision, examination and regulation of both the Office of the Commissioner of Financial Institutions of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico (“OCIF”) and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (the “FDIC”). Deposits are insured through the FDIC Deposit Insurance Fund. FirstBank also operates in the state of Florida, (USA), subject to regulation and examination by the Florida Office of Financial Regulation and the FDIC, in the U.S. Virgin Islands, and is subject to regulation and examination by the United States Virgin Islands Banking Board, and in the British Virgin Islands, operations are subject to regulation by the British Virgin Islands Financial Services Commission.
     FirstBank Insurance Agency is subject to the supervision, examination and regulation by the Office of the Insurance Commissioner of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico. PR Finance Group is subject to the supervision, examination and regulation of the OCIF. FirstBank Florida is subject to the supervision, examination and regulation of the Office of Thrift Supervision (the “OTS”).
     As of December 31, 2008,     FirstBank conducted its business through its main office located in San Juan, Puerto Rico, forty-eight full service banking branches in Puerto Rico, sixteen branches in the United States Virgin Islands (USVI) and British Virgin Islands (BVI) and a loan production officeten branches in Miami,the state of Florida (USA). FirstBank had foursix wholly-owned subsidiaries with operations in Puerto Rico: First Leasing and Rental Corporation, a vehicle leasing and daily rental company with ninetwo offices in Puerto Rico; First Federal Finance Corp. (d/b/a Money Express La Financiera), a finance company specializedspecializing in the origination of small loans with thirty-seventwenty-seven offices in Puerto Rico; First Mortgage, Inc. (“First Mortgage”), a residential mortgage loan origination company with thirty-sixthirty-eight offices in FirstBank branches and at stand alone sites; First Management of Puerto Rico, a domestic corporation; FirstBank Puerto Rico Securities Corp, a broker-dealer subsidiary created in March 2009 and engaged in municipal bond underwriting and financial advisory services on structured financings principally provided to government entities in the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico; and FirstBank Overseas Corporation, an international banking entity organized under the International Banking Entity Act of Puerto Rico. FirstBank had three subsidiaries with operations outside of Puerto Rico: First Insurance Agency VI, Inc., an insurance agency with fourthree offices that sells insurance products in the USVI; First Express, a finance company specializing in the origination of small loans with fourthree offices in the USVI; and First Trade, Inc., which is inactive.
     The Corporation also operates in the United States mainland through its federally chartered stock savings and loan association FirstBank Florida and through its loan production office located in Miami, Florida. FirstBank Florida provides a wide range of banking services to individual and corporate customers through its nine branches in the U.S. mainland.

F-9


FIRST BANCORP
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
Principles of consolidation
     The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Corporation and its subsidiaries. All significant intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.
     Statutory business trusts that are wholly-owned by the Corporation and are issuers of trust preferred securities are not consolidated in the Corporation’s consolidated financial statements in accordance with authoritative guidance issued by the provisionsFinancial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) for consolidation of Financial Interpretation No. (“FIN”) 46R, “Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities — an Interpretation of ARB No. 51”.variable interest entities.
Reclassifications
     For purposes of comparability, certain prior period amounts have been reclassified to conform to the 20082009 presentation.
Use of estimates in the preparation of financial statements
     The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and contingent assets and liabilities as ofat the date of the financial statements, and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Cash and cash equivalents
     For purposes of reporting cash flows, cash and cash equivalents include cash on hand, amounts due from banks, federal funds sold and short-term investments with original maturities of three months or less.
Securities purchased under agreements to resell
     The Corporation purchases securities under agreements to resell the same securities. The counterparty retains control over the securities acquired. Accordingly, amounts advanced under these agreements represent short-term loans and are reflected as assets in the statements of financial condition. The Corporation monitors the market value of the underlying securities as compared to the related receivable, including accrued interest, and requests additional collateral when deemed appropriate. As of December 31, 20082009 and 2007,2008, there were no securities purchased under agreements to resell outstanding.
Investment securities
     The Corporation classifies its investments in debt and equity securities into one of four categories:
     Held-to-maturity— Securities which the entity has the intent and ability to hold-to-maturity.hold to maturity. These securities are carried at amortized cost. The Corporation may not sell or transfer held-to-maturity securities without calling into question its intent to hold other debt securities to maturity, unless a nonrecurring or unusual event that could not have been reasonably anticipated has occurred.
     Trading— Securities that are bought and held principally for the purpose of selling them in the near term. These securities are carried at fair value, with unrealized gains and losses reported in earnings. As of December 31, 20082009 and 2007,2008, the Corporation did not hold investment securities for trading purposes.
     Available-for-sale— Securities not classified as held-to-maturity or trading. These securities are carried at fair value, with unrealized holding gains and losses, net of deferred tax, reported in other comprehensive income as a separate component of stockholders’ equity.equity and do not affect earnings until realized or are deemed to be other-than-temporarily impaired.
     Other equity securities— Equity securities that do not have readily available fair values are classified as other equity securities in the consolidated statements of financial condition. These securities are stated at the lower of

F-10


FIRST BANCORP
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
cost or realizable value. This category is principally composed of stock that is owned by the Corporation to comply with Federal Home Loan Bank (FHLB) regulatory requirements. Their realizable value equals their cost.
     Premiums and discounts on investment securities are amortized as an adjustment to interest income on investments over the life of the related securities under the interest method. Net realized gains and losses and valuation adjustments considered other-than-temporary, if any, related to investment securities are determined using the specific identification method and are reported in Non-interestnon-interest income as net gain (loss)impairment losses on investments and impairments.investment securities. Purchases and sales of securities are recognized on a trade-date basis.
Evaluation of other-than-temporary impairment (“OTTI”) on held-to-maturity and available-for-sale securities
     TheOn a quarterly basis, the Corporation evaluates for impairmentperforms an assessment to determine whether there have been any events or circumstances indicating that a security with an unrealized loss has suffered OTTI. A security is considered impaired if the fair value is less than its debt and equity securities when their fair market value has remained belowamortized cost for six consecutive months or more, or earlier if other factors indicative of potential impairment exist. Investments are considered to be impaired when their cost exceeds fair market value.basis.
     The Corporation evaluates if the impairment is other-than-temporary depending upon whether the portfolio is of fixed income securities or equity securities as further described below. The Corporation employs a systematic methodology that considers all available evidence in evaluating a potential impairment of its investments.
     The impairment analysis of the fixed income investmentssecurities places special emphasis on the analysis of the cash position of the issuer and its cash and capital generation capacity, which could increase or diminish the issuer’s ability to repay its bond obligations.obligations, the length of time and the extent to which the fair value has been less than the amortized cost basis and changes in the near-term prospects of the underlying collateral, if applicable, such as changes in default rates, loss severity given default and significant changes in prepayment assumptions. In light of the current crisis in thevolatile economic and financial markets,market conditions, the Corporation also takes into consideration the latest information available about the overall financial condition of issuers,an issuer, credit ratings, recent legislation and government actions affecting the issuer’s industry and actions taken by the issuersissuer to deal with the present economic climate. In April 2009, the FASB amended the OTTI model for debt securities. OTTI losses are recognized in earnings if the Corporation has the intent to sell the debt security or it is more likely than not that it will be required to sell the debt security before recovery of its amortized cost basis. However, even if the Corporation does not expect to sell a debt security, expected cash flows to be received are evaluated to determine if a credit loss has occurred. An unrealized loss is generally deemed to be other-than-temporary and a credit loss is deemed to exist if the present value of the expected future cash flows is less than the amortized cost basis of the debt security. The credit loss component of an OTTI is recorded as a component of Net impairment losses on investment securities in the statements of (loss) income, while the remaining portion of the impairment loss is recognized in other comprehensive income, net of taxes. The previous amortized cost basis less the OTTI recognized in earnings is the new amortized cost basis of the investment. The new amortized cost basis is not adjusted for subsequent recoveries in fair value. However, for debt securities for which OTTI was recognized in earnings, the difference between the new amortized cost basis and the cash flows expected to be collected is accreted as interest income. For further disclosures, refer to Note 4 to the consolidated financial statements.
     Prior to April 1, 2009, an unrealized loss was considered other-than-temporary and recorded in earnings if (i) it was probable that the holder would not collect all amounts due according to contractual terms of the debt security, or (ii) the fair value was below the amortized cost of the security for a prolonged period of time and the Corporation also considers itsdid not have the positive intent and ability to hold the fixed incomesecurity until recovery or maturity.
     The impairment model for equity securities until recovery. If management believes, based onwas not affected by the analysis, that the issuer will not be able to service its debt and pay its obligations in a timely manner, the security is written down to the estimated fair value. For securities written down to their estimated fair value, any accrued and uncollected interest is also reversed. Interest income is then recognized when collected.
aforementioned FASB amendment. The impairment analysis of equity securities is performed and reviewed on an ongoing basis based on the latest financial information and any supporting research report made by a major brokerage firm. This analysis is very subjective and based, among other things, on relevant financial data such as capitalization, cash flow, liquidity, systematic risk, and debt outstanding of the issuer. Management also considers the issuer’s industry trends, the historical performance of the stock, credit ratings as well as the Corporation’s intent to hold the security for an extended period. If management believes there is a low probability of recovering book value in a reasonable time frame, then an impairment will be recorded by writing the security down to market value. As previously mentioned, equity securities are monitored on an ongoing basis but special attention is given to those securities that have experienced a decline in fair value for six months or more. An impairment charge is generally recognized when the fair value of an equity security has remained significantly below cost for a period of twelve consecutive months or more.

F-11


FIRST BANCORP
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
Loans
     Loans are stated at the principal outstanding balance, net of unearned interest, unamortized deferred origination fees and costs and unamortized premiums and discounts. Fees collected and costs incurred in the origination of new loans are deferred and amortized using the interest method or a method which approximates the interest method over the term of the loan as an adjustment to interest yield. Unearned interest on certain personal, auto loans and finance leases is recognized as income under a method which approximates the interest method. When a loan is paid off or sold, any unamortized net deferred fee (cost) is credited (charged) to income.
     Loans on which the recognition of interest income has been discontinued are designated as non-accruing. When loans are placed on non-accruing status, any accrued but uncollected interest income is reversed and charged against interest income. Consumer, construction, commercial and mortgage loans are classified as non-accruing when interest and principal have not been received for a period of 90 days or more. This policymore or when there are doubts about the potential to collect all of the principal based on collateral deficiencies or, in other situations, when collection of all of the principal or interest is alsonot expected due to deterioration in the financial condition of the borrower. Interest income on non-accruing loans is recognized only to the extent it is received in cash. However, where there is doubt regarding the ultimate collectability of loan principal, all cash thereafter received is applied to all impairedreduce the carrying value of such loans based upon an evaluation(i.e., the cost recovery method). Loans are restored to accrual status only when future payments of the risk characteristics of said loans, loss experience, economic conditionsinterest and other pertinent factors.principal are reasonably assured.
     Loan and lease losses are charged and recoveries are credited to the allowance for loan and lease losses. Closed-end personal consumer loans and leases are charged-off when payments are

F-11


FIRST BANCORP
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
120 days in arrears. Collateralized auto and finance leases are reserved at 120 days delinquent and charged-off to their estimated net realizable value when collateral deficiency is deemed uncollectible (i.e. when foreclosure is probable). Open-end (revolving credit) consumer loans are charged-off when payments are 180 days in arrears.
     A loan is considered impaired when, based upon current information and events, it is probable that the Corporation will be unable to collect all amounts due (including principal and interest) according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement. The Corporation may also classifymeasures impairment individually for those commercial and construction loans in non-accruing status and recognize revenue only when cash payments are received becausewith a principal balance of $1 million or more, including loans for which a charge-off has been recorded based upon the fair value of the deteriorationunderlying collateral, and also evaluates for impairment purposes certain residential mortgage loans with high delinquency and loan-to-value levels. Interest income on impaired loans is recognized based on the Corporation’s policy for recognizing interest on accrual and non-accrual loans. Impaired loans also include loans that have been modified in troubled debt restructurings as a concession to borrowers experiencing financial difficulties. Troubled debt restructurings typically result from the financial condition of the borrower and payment in full of principal or interest is not expected. In addition, during the third quarter of 2007, the Corporation started a loanCorporation’s loss mitigation program providing homeownership preservation assistance. Loans modified through this programactivities or programs sponsored by the Federal Government and could include rate reductions, principal forgiveness, forbearance and other actions intended to minimize the economic loss and to avoid foreclosure or repossession of collateral. Troubled debt restructurings are generally reported as non-performing loans and interestrestored to accrual status when there is recognized on a cash basis. When there is reasonable assurance of repayment and the borrower has made payments over a sustained period, generally six months. However, a loan that has been formally restructured as to be reasonably assured of repayment and of performance according to its modified terms is not placed in non-accruing status, provided the loanrestructuring is returnedsupported by a current, well documented credit evaluation of the borrower’s financial condition taking into consideration sustained historical payment performance for a reasonable time prior to accruing status.the restructuring.
Loans held for sale
     Loans held for sale are stated at the lower-of-cost-or-market. The amount by which cost exceeds market value in the aggregate portfolio of loans held for sale, if any, is accounted for as a valuation allowance with changes therein included in the determination of net income. As of December 31, 2008 and 2007, the aggregate fair value of loans held for sale exceeded their cost.
Allowance for loan and lease losses
     The Corporation maintains the allowance for loan and lease losses at a level that management considersconsidered adequate to absorb losses currently inherent in the loansloan and leaseslease portfolio. The methodology used to establish the allowance for loan and lease losses is based on Statementprovides for probable losses that have been identified with specific valuation allowances for individually evaluated impaired loans and for probable losses believed to be inherent in the loan portfolio that have not been specifically identified. Internal risk ratings are assigned to each business loan at the time of Financial Accounting Standard No. (“SFAS”) 114, “Accountingapproval and are subject to subsequent periodic reviews by Creditors for Impairment of a Loan” (as amended by SFAS No. 118), and SFAS 5, “Accounting for Contingencies.” Under SFAS 114, commercial loans over a predefined amount are identified for impairment evaluation on an individual basis.

F-12


FIRST BANCORP
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
the Corporation’s senior management. The adequacy of the allowance for loan and lease losses is reviewed on a quarterly basis as part of the Corporation’s continued evaluation of its asset quality. Management allocates specific portions of the allowance for loan and lease losses to problem loans that are identified through an asset classification analysis. The portfolios of residential mortgage loans, consumer loans, auto loans and finance leases are individually considered homogeneous and each portfolio is evaluated in as pools of similar loans for impairment. The adequacy of the allowance for loan and lease losses is based upon a number of factors including historical loan and lease loss experience that may not fully represent current conditions inherent in the portfolio. For example, factors affecting the Puerto Rico, Florida (USA), US Virgin Islands’ or British Virgin Islands’ economies may contribute to delinquencies and defaults above the Corporation’s historical loan and lease losses. The Corporation addresses this risk by actively monitoring the delinquency and default experience and by considering current economic and market conditions and their probable impact on the borrowers. Based on the assessment of current conditions, the Corporation makes appropriate adjustments to the historically developed assumptions when necessary to adjust historical factors to account for present conditions. The Corporation also takes into consideration information about trends on non-accrual loans, delinquencies, changes in underwriting policies, and other risk characteristics relevant to the particular loan category.
     The Corporation measures impairment individually for those commercial and real estate loans with a principal balance of $1 million or more in accordance with the provisions of SFAS 114. A loan is impaired when, based on current information and events, it is probable that the Corporation will be unable to collect all amounts due according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement.     A specific reservevaluation allowance is determinedestablished for those commercial and real estate loans classified as impaired, primarily based on each such loan’swhen the collateral value of the loan (if the impaired loan is determined to be collateral dependent) or the present value of the expected future cash flows discounted at the loan’s effective interest rate. Ifrate is lower than the carrying amount of that loan. To compute the specific valuation allowance, commercial and real estate, including residential mortgage loans with a principal balance of $1 million or more are evaluated individually as well as smaller residential mortgage loans considered impaired based on their high delinquency and loan-to-value levels. When foreclosure is probable, the creditorimpairment is required to measure the impairmentmeasured based on the fair value of the collateral. The fair value of the collateral is generally obtained from appraisals. Updated appraisals are obtained when the Corporation determines that loans are impaired and are updated annually thereafter. In addition, appraisals are also obtained for certain residential mortgage loans on a spot basis selected bybased on specific characteristics such as delinquency levels, age of the appraisal, and loan-to-value ratios. Should there be a deficiency,Deficiencies from the Corporation records a specific allowance for loan losses related to these loans.
     As a general procedure, the Corporation internally reviews appraisals on a spot basis as partexcess of the underwriting and approval process. For constructionrecorded investment in collateral dependent loans related toover the Miami Corporate Banking operations, appraisals are

F-12


FIRST BANCORP
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
reviewed by an outsourced contracted appraiser. Once a loan backed by real estate collateral deteriorates or is accounted for in non-accrual status, a full assessment of theresulting fair value of the collateral is performed. Ifare charged-off when deemed uncollectible.
     For all other loans, which include, small, homogeneous loans, such as auto loans, consumer loans, finance lease loans, residential mortgages, and commercial and construction loans not considered impaired or in amounts under $1 million, the Corporation commences litigationmaintains a general valuation allowance. The methodology to collect an outstandingcompute the general valuation allowance has not change in the past 2 years. The Corporation updates the factors used to compute the reserve factors on a quarterly basis. The general reserve is primarily determined by applying loss factors according to the loan type and assigned risk category (pass, special mention and substandard not impaired; all doubtful loans are considered impaired). The general reserve for consumer loans is based on factors such as delinquency trends, credit bureau score bands, portfolio type, geographical location, bankruptcy trends, recent market transactions, and other environmental factors such as economic forecasts. The analysis of the residential mortgage pools are performed at the individual loan level and then aggregated to determine the expected loss ratio. The model applies risk-adjusted prepayment curves, default curves, and severity curves to each loan in the pool. The severity is affected by the expected house price scenario based on recent house price trends. Default curves are used in the model to determine expected delinquency levels. The risk-adjusted timing of liquidation and associated costs are used in the model and are risk-adjusted for the area in which the property is located (Puerto Rico, Florida, or commences foreclosure proceedings against a borrower (which includesVirgin Islands). For commercial loans, including construction loans, the collateral), a new appraisal reportgeneral reserve is requested and the book value is adjusted accordingly, either by a corresponding reserve or a charge-off.
     The Credit Risk area requests newbased on historical loss ratios, trends in non-accrual loans, loan type, risk-rating, geographical location, changes in collateral appraisalsvalues for impaired collateral dependent loans. In order to determine present market conditionsloans and gross product or unemployment data for the geographical region. The methodology of accounting for all probable losses in Puerto Rico and the Virgin Islands, and to gauge property appreciation rates, opinions of value are requestedloans not individually measured for a sample of delinquent residential real estate loans. The valuation information gathered through these appraisalsimpairment purposes is considered in the Corporation’s allowance model assumptions.
     Cash payments received on impaired loans are recordedmade in accordance with the contractual termsauthoritative accounting guidance that requires losses be accrued when they are probable of the loan. The principal portion of the payment is used to reduce the principal balance of the loan, whereas the interest portion is recognized as interest income. However, when management believes the ultimate collectibility of principal is in doubt, the interest portion is applied to principal.occurring and estimable.
Transfers and servicing of financial assets and extinguishment of liabilities
     After a transfer of financial assets that qualifies for sale accounting, the Corporation derecognizes financial assets when control has been surrendered, and derecognizes liabilities when extinguished.
     The transfer of financial assets in which the Corporation surrenders control over the assets is accounted for as a sale to the extent that consideration other than beneficial interests is received in exchange. SFAS 140, “Accounting for Transfer and Servicing of Financial Assets and Liabilities — a Replacement of SFAS No. 125,” sets forth theThe criteria that must be met forto determine that the control over transferred assets to be considered to havehas been surrendered, which includes: (1) the assets must be isolated from creditors of the transferor, (2) the transferee must obtain the right (free of conditions that constrain it from taking advantage of that right) to pledge or exchange the transferred assets, and (3) the transferor cannot maintain effective control over the transferred assets through an agreement to repurchase them before their maturity. When the Corporation transfers financial assets and the transfer fails any one of the SFAS 140above criteria, the Corporation is prevented from derecognizing the transferred financial assets and the transaction is accounted for as a secured borrowing.
Servicing Assets
     The Corporation recognizes as separate assets the rights to service loans for others, whether those servicing assets are originated or purchased. The Corporation is actively involved in the securitization of pools of FHA-insured and VA-guaranteed mortgages for issuance of GNMA mortgage-backed securities. Also, certain conventional conforming-loans are sold to FNMA or FHLMC with servicing retained. When the Corporation securitizes or sells

F-13


FIRST BANCORP
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
mortgage loans, it allocates the cost of the mortgage loans between the mortgage loan pool sold and the retained interests, based on their relative fair values.
     Servicing assets (“MSRs”) retained in a sale or securitization arise from contractual agreements between the Corporation and investors in mortgage securities and mortgage loans. The value of MSRs is derived from the net positive cash flows associated with the servicing contracts. Under these contracts, the Corporation performs loan servicing functions in exchange for fees and other remuneration. The servicing functions typically include: collecting and remitting loan payments, responding to borrower inquiries, accounting for principal and interest, holding custodial funds for payment of property taxes and insurance premiums, supervising foreclosures and property dispositions, and generally administering the loans. The servicing rights entitle the Corporation to annual servicing fees based on the outstanding principal balance of the mortgage loans and the contractual servicing rate. The servicing fees are credited to income on a monthly basis when collected and recorded as part of mortgage banking activities in the consolidated statements of (loss) income. In addition, the Corporation generally receives other remuneration consisting of mortgagor-contracted fees such as late charges and prepayment penalties, which are credited to income when collected.
     Considerable judgment is required to determine the fair value of the Corporation’s servicing assets. Unlike highly liquid investments, the market value of servicing assets cannot be readily determined because these assets are not actively traded in securities markets. The initial carrying value of the servicing assets is generally determined based on an allocation of the carrying amount of the loans sold (adjusted for deferred fees and costs related to loan origination activities) and the retained interest (MSRs) based on their relative fair value. The fair value of the MSRs is determined based on a combination of market information on trading activity (MSR trades and broker valuations), benchmarking of servicing assets (valuation surveys) and cash flow modeling. The valuation of the Corporation’s MSRs incorporates two sets of assumptions: (1) market derived assumptions for discount rates, servicing costs, escrow earnings rate, float earnings rate and cost of funds and (2) market assumptions calibrated to the Company’s loan characteristics and portfolio behavior for escrow balances, delinquencies and foreclosures, late fees, prepayments and prepayment penalties.
     Once recorded, MSRs are periodically evaluated for impairment. Impairment occurs when the current fair value of the MSRs is less than its carrying value. If MSRs are impaired, the impairment is recognized in current-period earnings and the carrying value of the MSRs is adjusted through a valuation allowance. If the value of the MSRs subsequently increases, the recovery in value is recognized in current period earnings and the carrying value of the MSRs is adjusted through a reduction in the valuation allowance. For purposes of performing the MSR impairment evaluation, the servicing portfolio is stratified on the basis of certain risk characteristics such as region, terms and coupons. An other-than-temporary impairment analysis is prepared to evaluate whether a loss in the value of the MSRs, if any, is other than temporary or not. When the recovery of the value is unlikely in the foreseeable future, a write-down of the MSRs in the stratum to its estimated recoverable value is charged to the valuation allowance.
     The servicing assets are amortized over the estimated life of the underlying loans based on an income forecast method as a reduction of servicing income. The income forecast method of amortization is based on projected cash flows. A particular periodic amortization is calculated by applying to the carrying amount of the MSRs the ratio of the cash flows projected for the current period to total remaining net MSR forecasted cash flow.
Premises and equipment
     Premises and equipment are carried at cost, net of accumulated depreciation. Depreciation is provided on the straight-line method over the estimated useful life of each type of asset. Amortization of leasehold improvements is computed over the terms of the leases (contractual term plus lease renewals that are “reasonably assured”) or the estimated useful lives of the improvements, whichever is shorter. Costs of maintenance and repairs that do not improve or extend the life of the respective assets are expensed as incurred. Costs of renewals and betterments are capitalized. When assets are sold or disposed of, their cost and related accumulated depreciation are removed from the accounts and any gain or loss is reflected in earnings.
     The Corporation has operating lease agreements primarily associated with the rental of premises to support the branch network or for general office space. Certain of these arrangements are non-cancelable and provide for rent

F-14


FIRST BANCORP
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
escalation and renewal options. Rent expense on non-cancelable operating leases with scheduled rent increases is recognized on a straight-line basis over the lease term.
Other real estate owned (OREO)
     Other real estate owned, which consists of real estate acquired in settlement of loans, is recorded at the lower of cost (carrying value of the loan) or fair value minus estimated cost to sell the real estate acquired. Subsequent to foreclosure, gains or losses resulting from the sale of these properties and losses recognized on the periodic reevaluations of these properties are credited or charged to income. The cost of maintaining and operating these properties is expensed as incurred.

F-13


FIRST BANCORP
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
Goodwill and other intangible assets
     Business combinations are accounted for using the purchase method of accounting. Assets acquired and liabilities assumed are recorded at estimated fair value as of the date of acquisition. After initial recognition, any resulting intangible assets are accounted for as follows:
     Goodwill
The Corporation testevaluates goodwill for impairment on an annual basis, as of December 31, or more often if events or circumstances indicate there may be an impairment. Goodwill impairment testing is performed at the segment (or “reporting unit”) level. Goodwill is assigned to reporting units at the date the goodwill is initially recorded. Once goodwill has been assigned to reporting units, it no longer retains its association with a particular acquisition, and all of the activities within a reporting unit, whether acquired or internally generated, are available to support the value of the goodwill. The Corporation’s goodwill is mainly related to the acquisition of FirstBank Florida in 2005. Effective July 1, 2009, the operations conducted by FirstBank Florida as a separate entity were merged with and into FirstBank Puerto Rico.
The goodwill impairment analysis is a two-step test.process. The first step used to identify potential impairment,(“Step 1”) involves comparinga comparison of the subsidiary estimated fair value of the reporting unit (FirstBank Florida) to its carrying value, including goodwill. If the estimated fair value of a subsidiaryreporting unit exceeds its carrying value, goodwill is considered not to beconsidered impaired. If the carrying value exceeds estimated fair value, there is an indication of potential impairment and the second step is performed to measure the amount of the impairment.
The second step (“Step(Step 2”) involves calculating an implied fair value of goodwill.the goodwill for each reporting unit for which the first step indicated a potential impairment. The implied fair value of goodwill is determined in a manner similar to the calculation of the amount of goodwill calculated in a business combination, by measuring the excess of the estimated fair value of the reporting unit, as determined in the first step, over the aggregate estimated fair values of the individual assets, liabilities and identifiable intangibles.intangibles as if the reporting unit was being acquired in a business combination. If the implied fair value of goodwill exceeds the carrying value of goodwill assigned to the reporting unit, there is no impairment. If the carrying value of goodwill assigned to a reporting unit exceeds the implied fair value of the goodwill, an impairment charge is recorded for the excess. An impairment loss cannot exceed the carrying value of goodwill assigned to a reporting unit, and the loss establishes a new basis in the goodwill. Subsequent reversal of goodwill impairment losses is not permitted.
     In determining the fair value of a reporting unit and based on the nature of the business and reporting unit’s current and expected financial performance, the Corporation uses a combination of methods, including market price multiples of comparable companies, as well as discounted cash flow analysis (“DCF”). The Corporation evaluates the results obtained under each valuation methodology to identify and understand the key value drivers in order to ascertain that the results obtained are reasonable and appropriate under the circumstances.

F-15


FIRST BANCORP
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
     The computations require management to make estimates and assumptions. Critical assumptions that are used as part of these evaluations include:
a selection of comparable publicly traded companies, based on nature of business, location and size;
the discount rate applied to future earnings, based on an estimate of the cost of equity;
the potential future earnings of the reporting unit; and
the market growth and new business assumptions.
     For purposes of the market comparable approach, valuation was determined by calculating median price to book value and price to tangible equity multiples of the comparable companies and applied these multiples to the reporting unit to derive an implied value of equity.
     For purposes of the DCF analysis approach, the valuation is based on estimated future cash flows. The financial projections used in the DCF analysis for the reporting unit are based on the most recent (as of the valuation date). The growth assumptions included in these projections are based on management’s expectations of the reporting unit’s financial prospects as well as particular plans for the entity (i.e. restructuring plans). The cost of equity was estimated using the capital asset pricing model (CAPM) using comparable companies, an equity risk premium, the rate of return of a “riskless” asset, and a size premium. The discount rate was estimated to be 14.0 percent. The resulting discount rate was analyzed in terms of reasonability given current market conditions.
     The Corporation conducted its annual evaluation of goodwill during the fourth quarter of 2009. The Step 1 evaluation of goodwill allocated to the Florida reporting unit, which is one level below the United States business segment, indicated potential impairment of goodwill. The Step 1 fair value for the unit under both valuation approaches (market and DCF) was below the carrying amount of its equity book value as of the valuation date (December 31), requiring the completion of Step 2. In accordance with accounting standards, the Corporation performed a valuation of all assets and liabilities of the Florida unit, including any recognized and unrecognized intangible assets, to determine the fair value of net assets. To complete Step 2, the Corporation subtracted from the unit’s Step 1 fair value the determined fair value of the net assets to arrive at the implied fair value of goodwill. The results of the Step 2 analysis indicated that the implied fair value of goodwill exceeded the goodwill carrying value of $27 million, resulting in no goodwill impairment. The analysis of results for Step 2 indicated that the reduction in the fair value of the reporting unit was mainly attributable to the deteriorated fair value of the loan portfolios and not the fair value of the reporting unit as going concern. The discount in the loan portfolios is mainly attributable to market participants’ expected rates of returns, which affected the market discount on the Florida commercial mortgage and residential mortgage portfolios. The fair value of the loan portfolio determined for the Florida reporting unit represented a discount of 22.5%.
     The reduction in the Florida unit Step 1 fair value was offset by a reduction in the fair value of its net assets, resulting in an implied fair value of goodwill based on a discounted cash flows analysis and also considers a market methodology using tangiblethat exceeded the recorded book value multiples of peers.goodwill. If the Step 1 fair value of the Florida unit declines further without a corresponding decrease in the fair value of its net assets or if loan discounts improve without a corresponding increase in the Step 1 fair value, the Corporation may be required to record a goodwill impairment charge. The Corporation engaged a third-party valuator to assist management in the annual evaluation of the Florida unit goodwill (including Step 1 and Step 2), including the valuation of loan portfolios as of the December 31 valuation date. In reaching its conclusion on impairment, management discussed with the valuator the methodologies, assumptions and results supporting the relevant values for the goodwill and determined that they were reasonable.
     The goodwill impairment evaluation process requires the Corporation to make estimates and assumptions with regards to the fair value of the reporting units. Actual values may differ significantly from these estimates. Such differences could result in future impairment of goodwill that would, in turn, negatively impact the Corporation’s results of operations and the reporting unit where goodwill is recorded.
     Goodwill was not impaired as of December 31, 2009 or 2008, nor was any goodwill written-off due to impairment during 2009, 2008 and 2007.

F-16


FIRST BANCORP
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
     Other Intangibles
Definite life intangibles, mainly core deposits, are amortized over their estimated life, generally on a straight-line basis, and are reviewed periodically for impairment when events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount may not be recoverable.
     As a result of an impairment evaluation of core deposit intangibles, there was an impairment charge of $4.0 million recorded in 2009 related to core deposits of FirstBank Florida attributable to decreases in the base of acquired core deposits. The Corporation performed impairment tests for the yearsyear ended December 31, 2008 2007 and 20062007 and determined that no impairment was needed to be recognized for those periods for goodwill and other intangible assets. For further disclosures, refer to Note 11 to the consolidated financial statements.
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase
     The Corporation sells securities under agreements to repurchase the same or similar securities. Generally, similar securities are securities from the same issuer, with identical form and type, similar maturity, identical contractual interest rates, similar assets as collateral and the same aggregate unpaid principal amount. The Corporation retains control over the securities sold under these agreements. Accordingly, these agreements are considered financing transactions and the securities underlying the agreements remain in the asset accounts. The counterparty to certain agreements may have the right to repledge the collateral by contract or custom. Such assets are presented separately in the statements of financial condition as securities pledged to creditors that can be repledged.
Income taxes
     The Corporation uses the asset and liability method for the recognition of deferred tax assets and liabilities for the expected future tax consequences of events that have been recognized in the Corporation’s financial statements or

F-14


FIRST BANCORP
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
tax returns. Deferred income tax assets and liabilities are determined for differences between financial statement and tax bases of assets and liabilities that will result in taxable or deductible amounts in the future. The computation is based on enacted tax laws and rates applicable to periods in which the temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. Valuation allowances are established, when necessary, to reduce deferred tax assets to the amount that is more likely than not to be realized. In making such assessment, significant weight is given to evidence that can be objectively verified, including both positive and negative evidence. The accounting for income taxes authoritative guidance requires the consideration of all sources of taxable income available to realize the deferred tax asset, including the future reversal of existing temporary differences, future taxable income exclusive of reversing temporary differences and carryforwards, taxable income in carryback years and tax planning strategies. In estimating taxes, management assesses the relative merits and risks of the appropriate tax treatment of transactions taking into account statutory, judicial and regulatory guidance, and recognizes tax benefits only when deemed probable. Refer to Note 27 to the consolidated financial statements for additional information.
     TheEffective January 1, 2007, the Corporation adopted Financial Accounting Standards Board Interpretation No. (“FIN”) 48, “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes — an interpretation ofauthoritative guidance issued by the FASB Statement No. 109,” effective January 1, 2007. FIN 48 clarifies the accounting for uncertainty in income taxes recognized in an enterprise’s financial statements in accordance with SFAS 109. This Interpretationthat prescribes a recognition threshold and measurement attributecomprehensive model for the financial statement recognition, measurement, presentation and measurementdisclosure of aincome tax positionuncertainties with respect to positions taken or expected to be taken inon income tax returns. Under the authoritative accounting guidance, income tax benefits are recognized and measured upon a two-step model: 1) a tax return. This Interpretation also provides guidanceposition must be more likely than not to be sustained based solely on derecognition, classification, interestits technical merits in order to be recognized, and penalties, accounting2) the benefit is measured as the largest dollar amount of that position that is more likely than not to be sustained upon settlement. The difference between the benefit recognized in interim periods, disclosure,accordance with this model and transition.the tax benefit claimed on a tax return is referred to as an Unrecognized Tax Benefit (“UTB”). The Corporation classifies interest and penalties, if any, related to unrecognized tax portionsUTBs as components of income tax expense. Refer to Note 2527 for required disclosures and further information related to this accounting pronouncement.information.

F-15F-17


FIRST BANCORP
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
Treasury stock
     The Corporation accounts for treasury stock at par value. Under this method, the treasury stock account is increased by the par value of each share of common stock reacquired. Any excess paid per share over the par value is debited to additional paid-in capital for the amount per share that was originally credited. Any remaining excess is charged to retained earnings.
Stock-based compensation
     Between 1997 and 2007, the Corporation had a stock option plan (the “1997(“the 1997 stock option plan”) covering certaineligible employees. On January 1, 2006, theThe Corporation adopted SFAS 123 (Revised), “Accountingaccounted for Stock-Based Compensation,”stock options using the “modified prospective” method. Under thisthe modified prospective method, and sincecompensation cost is recognized in the financial statements for all previously issued stock options were fully vested at the time of adoption, the Corporation expenses the fair value of all employee stock optionsshare-based payments granted after January 1, 2006 (which is the same as under the prospective method).2006. The 1997 stock option plan expired in the first quarter of 2007; all outstanding awards grants under this plan continue to be in full force and effect, subject to their original terms. No awards for shares could be granted under the 1997 stock option plan as of its expiration.
     On April 29, 2008, the Corporation’s stockholders approved the First BanCorp 2008 Omnibus Incentive Plan (the “Omnibus Plan”). The Omnibus Plan provides for equity-based compensation incentives (the “awards”) through the grant of stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock, restricted stock units, performance shares, and other stock-based awards. On December 1, 2008, the Corporation granted 36, 243 shares of restricted stock under the Omnibus Plan to the Corporation’s independent directors. Shares of restricted stock are measured based on the fair market values of the underlying stocksstock at the grant date under SFAS 123R.dates. The restrictions on such restricted stock award will lapse ratably on an annual basis over a three-year period.
     SFAS 123RStock-based compensation accounting guidance requires the Corporation to develop an estimate of the pre-vestingnumber of share-based awards that will be forfeited due to employee or director turnover. Changes in the estimated forfeiture rate may have a significant effect on share-based compensation, as the effect of adjusting the rate for grants that are forfeited prior to vesting beginning on the grant date and to true-up forfeiture estimates through the vesting date so that compensationall expense amortization is recognized only for grants that vest.in the period in which the forfeiture estimate is changed. If the actual forfeiture rate is higher than the estimated forfeiture rate, then an adjustment is made to increase the estimated forfeiture rate, which will result in a decrease to the expense recognized in the financial statements. If the actual forfeiture rate is lower than the estimated forfeiture rate, then an adjustment is made to decrease the estimated forfeiture rate, which will result in an increase to the expense recognized in the financial statements. When unvested grantsoptions or shares of restricted stock are forfeited, any compensation expense previously recognized on the forfeited grantsawards is reversed in the period of the forfeiture. Accordingly, periodic compensation expense includes adjustments for actual and estimated pre-vesting forfeitures and changes in the estimated pre-vesting forfeiture rate. For additional information regarding the Corporation’s equity-based compensation refer to Note 20.22.
Comprehensive income
     Comprehensive income for First BanCorp includes net income and the unrealized gain (loss) on available-for-sale securities, available-for-sale, net of estimated tax effect.
Segment Information
The Corporation reports financial and descriptive information about its reportable segments (see Note 33). Operating segments are components of an enterprise about which separate financial information is available that is evaluated regularly by management in deciding how to allocate resources and in assessing performance. The Corporation’s management determined that the segregation that best fulfills the segment definition described above is by lines of business for its operations in Puerto Rico, the Corporation’s principal market, and by geographic areas for its operations outside of Puerto Rico. Starting in the fourth quarter of 2009, the Corporation has realigned its reporting segments to better reflect how it views and manages its business. Two additional operating segments were created to evaluate the operations conducted by the Corporation, outside of Puerto Rico. Operations conducted in the United States and in the Virgin Islands are now individually evaluated as separate operating segments. This realignment in the segment reporting essentially reflects the effect of restructuring initiatives, including the merger of FirstBank Florida operations with and into FirstBank, and will allow the Corporation to better present the results from its growth focus. Prior to 2009, the operating segments were driven primarily by the Corporation’s legal entities. FirstBank operations conducted in the Virgin Islands and through its loan production office in Miami, Florida were reflected in the Corporation’s then four reportable segments (Commercial and Corporate Banking; Mortgage Banking;

F-18


FIRST BANCORP
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
Consumer (Retail) Banking; Treasury and Investments) while the operations conducted by FirstBank Florida were reported as part of a category named “Other”. Refer to Note 33 for additional information.
Derivative financial instruments
     As part of the Corporation’s overall interest rate risk management, the Corporation utilizes derivative instruments, including interest rate swaps, interest rate caps and options to manage interest rate risk. In accordance with SFAS 133, “Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities” (“SFAS 133”), allAll derivative instruments are measured and recognized on the Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition at their fair value. On the date the derivative instrument contract is entered into, the Corporation may designate the derivative as (1) a hedge of the fair value of a recognized asset or liability or of an unrecognized firm commitment (“fair value” hedge), (2) a hedge of a forecasted transaction or of the variability of cash flows to be received or paid related to a recognized asset or liability (“cash flow” hedge) or (3) as a “standalone” derivative instrument, including economic hedges that the Corporation has not formally documented as a fair value or cash flow hedge. Changes in the fair value of a derivative instrument that is highly effective and that is designated and qualifies as a fair-value hedge, along with changes in the fair value of the hedged asset or liability that is attributable to the hedged risk (including gains or losses on firm commitments), are recorded in current-period earnings as interest income or interest expense depending upon whether an asset or liability is being hedged. Similarly, the changes in the fair value of standalone derivative instruments or derivatives not qualifying or designated for hedge accounting under SFAS 133 are reported in current-period earnings as interest income or interest expense depending upon whether an asset or liability is being economically hedged. Changes in the fair value of a derivative instrument that is highly effective and that is designated and qualifies as a cash-flow hedge, if any, are recorded in other comprehensive income in the

F-16


FIRST BANCORP
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
stockholders’ equity section of the Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition until earnings are affected by the variability of cash flows (e.g., when periodic settlements on a variable-rate asset or liability are recorded in earnings). NoneAs of December 31, 2009 and 2008, all derivatives held by the Corporation’s derivative instruments qualifiedCorporation were considered economic undesignated hedges recorded at fair value with the resulting gain or have been designated as a cash flow hedge.loss recognized in current period earnings.
     Prior to entering into an accounting hedge transaction or designating a hedge, the Corporation formally documents the relationship between the hedging instrument and the hedged item, as well as the risk management objective and strategy for undertaking the hedge transaction. This process includes linking all derivative instruments that are designated as fair value or cash flow hedges, if any, to specific assets and liabilities on the statements of financial condition or to specific firm commitments or forecasted transactions along with a formal assessment at both inception of the hedge and on an ongoing basis as to the effectiveness of the derivative instrument in offsetting changes in fair values or cash flows of the hedged item. The Corporation discontinues hedge accounting prospectively when it determines that the derivative is not effective or will no longer be effective in offsetting changes in the fair value or cash flows of the hedged item, the derivative expires, is sold, or terminated, or management determines that designation of the derivative as a hedging instrument is no longer appropriate. When a fair value hedge is discontinued, the hedged asset or liability is no longer adjusted for changes in fair value and the existing basis adjustment is amortized or accreted over the remaining life of the asset or liability as a yield adjustment.
     The Corporation recognizes unrealized gains and losses arising from any changes in fair value of derivative instruments and hedged items, as applicable, as interest income or interest expense depending upon whether an asset or liability is being hedged.
     The Corporation occasionally purchases or originates financial instruments that contain embedded derivatives. At inception of the financial instrument, the Corporation assesses: (1) if the economic characteristics of the embedded derivative are clearly and closely related to the economic characteristics of the financial instrument (host contract), (2) if the financial instrument that embodies both the embedded derivative and the host contract is measured at fair value with changes in fair value reported in earnings, or (3) if a separate instrument with the same terms as the embedded instrument would not meet the definition of a derivative. If the embedded derivative does not meet any of these conditions, it is separated from the host contract and carried at fair value with changes recorded in current period earnings as part of net interest income. Information regarding derivative instruments is included in Note 3032 to the Corporation’s auditedconsolidated financial statements.
     Effective January 1, 2007, the Corporation elected to early adopt SFAS 159, “The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities.” This Statementauthoritative guidance issued by the FASB that allows entities to choose to measure certain financial assets and liabilities at fair value with any changes in fair value reflected in earnings. The Corporation adopted the fair value option may be applied on an instrument-by-instrument basis. The Corporation adopted SFAS 159 for callable fixedfixed-rate medium-term notes and callable brokered certificates of deposit (“SFAS 159 liabilities”), that were hedged with interest rate swaps. From April 3, 2006 to the adoption of SFAS 159, First BanCorp was following the long-haul method of accounting under SFAS 133, for the portfolio of callable interest rate swaps, callable brokered certificates of deposit (“CDs”) and callable notes. One of the main considerations in the determination to early adopt SFAS 159the fair value option for these instruments was to eliminate the operational procedures required by the long-haul method of accounting in terms of documentation, effectiveness assessment, and manual

F-19


FIRST BANCORP
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
procedures followed by the Corporation to fulfill the requirements specified by SFAS 133.authoritative guidance issued by the FASB for derivative instruments designated as fair value hedges.
     With the Corporation’s elimination of the use of the long-haul method in connection with the adoption of SFAS 159,the fair value option, the Corporation no longer amortizes or accretes the basis adjustment for the SFAS 159 liabilities.financial liabilities elected to be measured at fair value. The basis adjustment amortization or accretion is the reversal of the basis differential between the market value and book value recognized at the inception of fair value hedge accounting as well as the change in value of the hedged brokered CDs and medium-term notes recognized since the implementation of the long-haul method. Since the time the Corporation implemented the long-haul method, it had recognized changes in the value of the hedged brokered CDs and medium-term notes based on the expected call date of the instruments. The adoption of SFAS 159the fair value option also requiresrequired the recognition, as part of the initial adoption adjustment to retained earnings, of all of the unamortized placement fees that were paid to broker counterparties upon the issuance of the elected brokered CDs and medium-term notes. The Corporation previously amortized those fees through earnings based on the expected call date of the instruments. SFAS 159The option of using fair value accounting also establishesrequires that the accrued interest should be reported as part of the fair value of the financial instruments elected to be measured at fair value. Refer to Note 2729 to the audited consolidated financial statements for additional information.

F-17


FIRST BANCORP
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
     Prior to the implementation of the long-haul method First BanCorp reflected changes in the fair value of those swaps as well as swaps related to certain loans as non-hedging instruments through operations as part of net interest income.
Valuation of financial instruments
     The measurement of fair value is fundamental to the Corporation’s presentation of its financial condition and results of operations. The Corporation holds fixed income and equity securities, derivatives, investments and other financial instruments at fair value. The Corporation holds its investments and liabilities on the statement of financial condition mainly to manage liquidity needs and interest rate risks. A substantial part of these assets and liabilities is reflected at fair value on the Corporation’s financial statement of condition.statements.
     Effective January 1, 2007, the Corporation elected to early adopt SFAS 157, “Fair Value Measurements.” This Statementadopted authoritative guidance issued by the FASB for fair value measurements which defines fair value as the exchange price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date. SFAS 157This guidance also establishes a fair value hierarchy whichthat requires an entity to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value. The standard describes threeThree levels of inputs that may be used to measure fair value:
Level 1
 Inputs are quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that the reporting entity has the ability to access at the measurement date.
Level 2
 Inputs other than quoted prices included within Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly, such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities; quoted prices in markets that are not active; or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of the assets or liabilities.
Level 3
 Valuations are observed from unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and that are significant to the fair value of the assets or liabilities.
     The following is a description of the valuation methodologies used for instruments measured at fair value:
     Callable Brokered CDs (Level 2 inputs)
     The fair value of callable brokered CDs, which are included within deposits and elected to be measured at fair value, under SFAS 159, is determined using discounted cash flow analyses over the full term of the CDs. The valuation uses a “Hull-White Interest Rate Tree” approach for the CDs with callable option components, an industry-standard approach for valuing instruments with interest rate call options. The model assumes that the embedded options are exercised economically. The fair value of the CDs is computed using the outstanding principal amount. The discount rates used are based on US dollar LIBOR and swap rates. At-the-money implied swaption volatility term structure (volatility by time to maturity) is used to calibrate the model to current market prices and value the cancellation option in the deposits. The fair value does not incorporate the risk of nonperformance, since the callable brokered CDs are generally participated out by brokers in shares of less than $100,000 and therefore insured by the FDIC. As of December 31,

F-20


FIRST BANCORP
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
2009, there were no callable brokered CDs outstanding measured at fair value since they were all called during 2009.
Medium-Term Notes (Level 2 inputs)
     The fair value of medium-term notes is determined using a discounted cash flow analysis over the full term of the borrowings. This valuation also uses the “Hull-White Interest Rate Tree” approach to value the option components of the term notes. The model assumes that the embedded options are exercised economically. The fair value of medium-term notes is computed using the notional amount outstanding. The discount rates used in the valuations are based on US dollar LIBOR and swap rates. At-the-money implied swaption volatility term structure (volatility by time to maturity) is used to calibrate the model to current market prices and value the cancellation option in the term notes. Effective January 1, 2007, the Corporation updated its methodology to calculate the impact of its own credit standing as required by SFAS 157. For the medium-term notes, the credit risk is measured using the difference in yield curves between swap rates and a yield curve that considers the industry and credit rating of the Corporation as issuer of the note at a tenor comparable to the time to maturity of the note and option.

F-18


FIRST BANCORP
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
Investment Securities
     The fair value of investment securities is the market value based on quoted market prices, when available, or market prices for identical or comparable assets that are based on observable market parameters including benchmark yields, reported trades, quotes from brokers or dealers, issuer spreads, bids offers and reference data including market research operations. Observable prices in the market already consider the risk of nonperformance. If listed prices or quotes are not available, fair value is based upon models that use unobservable inputs due to the limited market activity of the instrument (Level 3), as is the case with certain private label mortgage-backed securities held by the Corporation. Unlike U.S. agency mortgage-backed securities, the fair value of these private label securities cannot be readily determined because they are not actively traded in securities markets. Significant inputs used for fair value determination consist of specific characteristics such as information used in the prepayment model, which follows the amortizing schedule of the underlying loans, which is an unobservable input.
     Private label mortgage-backed securities are collateralized by fixed-rate mortgages on single-family residential properties in the United States and the interest rate is variable, tied to 3-month LIBOR and limited to the weighted-average coupon of the underlying collateral. The market valuation is derived from a model and represents the estimated net cash flows over the projected life of the pool of underlying assets applying a discount rate that reflects market observed floating spreads over LIBOR, with a widening spread bias on a non-rated security. The model usessecurity and utilizes relevant assumptions such as prepayment rate, default rate, and interest rate assumptions that market participants would commonly use for similar mortgage asset classes that are subject to prepayment, credit and interest rate risk.loss severity on a loan level basis. The Corporation modeled the cash flow from the fixed-rate mortgage collateral using a static cash flow analysis according to collateral attributes of the underlying mortgage pool (i.e. loan term, current balance, note rate, rate adjustment type, rate adjustment frequency, rate caps, others) in combination with prepayment forecasts obtained from a commercially available prepayment model (ADCO) and the. The variable cash flow of the security is modeled using the 3-month LIBOR forward curve. The expected foreclosure frequency estimates used inLoss assumptions were driven by the model are based on the 100% Public Securities Association (PSA) Standard Default Assumption (SDA) with acombination of default and loss severity assumption of 10% afterestimates, taking into consideration that the issuer must cover losses upaccount loan credit characteristics (loan-to-value, state, origination date, property type, occupancy loan purpose, documentation type, debt-to-income ratio, other) to 10%provide an estimate of the aggregate outstanding balance accordingdefault and loss severity. Refer to recourse provisions.Note 4 for additional information.
Derivative Instruments
     The fair value of most of the derivative instruments is based on observable market parameters and takes into consideration the credit risk component of paying counterparts when appropriate.appropriate, except when collateral is pledged. That is, on interest rate swaps, the credit risk of both counterparts is included in the valuation; and on options and caps, only the seller’s credit risk is considered. The “Hull-White Interest Rate Tree” approach is used to value the option components of derivative instruments, and discounting of the cash flows is performed using USDUS dollar LIBOR-based discount rates or yield curves that account for the industry sector and the credit rating of the counterparty and/or the Corporation. Derivatives are mainly composed ofinclude interest rate swaps used for protection against rising interest rates and, prior to June 30, 2009, included interest rate swaps to economically hedge brokered CDs and medium-term notes. For these interest rate swaps, a credit component is not considered in the valuation since the Corporation fully collateralizes with investment securities any mark-to-market loss with the counterparty and, if there are market gains, the counterparty must deliver collateral to the Corporation.

F-21


FIRST BANCORP
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
     Certain derivatives with limited market activity, as is the case with derivative instruments named as “reference caps”,caps,” are valued using models that consider unobservable market parameters (Level 3). Reference caps are used mainly to mainly hedge interest rate risk inherent in private label mortgage-backed securities, thus are tied to the notional amount of the underlying fixed-rate mortgage loans originated in the United States. Significant inputs used for fair value determination consist of specific characteristics such as information used in the prepayment model which follows the amortizing schedule of the underlying loans, which is an unobservable input. The valuation model uses the Black formula, which is a benchmark standard in the financial industry. The Black formula is similar to the Black-Scholes formula for valuing stock options except that the spot price of the underlying is replaced by the forward price. The Black formula uses as inputs the strike price of the cap, forward LIBOR rates, volatility estimates and discount rates to estimate the option value. LIBOR rates and swap rates are obtained from Bloomberg L.P. (“Bloomberg”) every day and build zero coupon curve based on the Bloomberg LIBOR/Swap curve. The discount factor is then calculated from the zero coupon curve. The cap is the sum of all caplets. For each caplet, the rate is reset at the beginning of each reporting period and payments are made at the end of each period. The cash flow of caplet is then discounted from each payment date.

F-19


FIRST BANCORP
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
Income recognition— Insurance agencies business
     Commission revenue is recognized as of the effective date of the insurance policy or the date the customer is billed, whichever is later. The Corporation also receives contingent commissions from insurance companies as additional incentive for achieving specified premium volume goals and/or the loss experience of the insurance placed by the Corporation. Contingent commissions from insurance companies are recognized when determinable, which is generally when such commissions are received or when the Corporation receives data from the insurance companies that allows the reasonable estimation of these amounts. The Corporation maintains an allowance to cover commissions that management estimates will be returned upon the cancellation of a policy.
Advertising costs
     Advertising costs for all reporting periods are expensed as incurred.
Earnings per common share
     Earnings per share-basic is calculated by dividing income attributable to common stockholders by the weighted average number of outstanding common shares. The computation of earnings per share-diluted is similar to the computation of earnings per share-basic except that the number of weighted average common shares is increased to include the number of additional common shares that would have been outstanding if the dilutive common shares had been issued. Potential common shares consist of common stock issuable under the assumed exercise of stock options, and unvested shares of restricted stock, and outstanding warrants using the treasury stock method. This method assumes that the potential common shares are issued and the proceeds from the exercise, in addition to the amount of compensation cost attributable to future services, are used to purchase common stock at the exercise date. The difference between the number of potential shares issued and the shares purchased is added as incremental shares to the actual number of shares outstanding to compute diluted earnings per share. Stock options, and unvested shares of restricted stock, and outstanding warrants that result in lower potential shares issued than shares purchased under the treasury stock method are not included in the computation of dilutive earnings per share since their inclusion would have an antidilutive effect in earnings per share.
Recently issued accounting pronouncements
     The Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) and the Securities Exchange Commission (“SEC”)FASB have issued the following accounting pronouncements and guidance relevant to the Corporation’s operations:
     In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS 160, “Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements — an amendment of ARB No. 51.” This Statement amends ARB 51 to establish accounting and reporting standards for the noncontrolling interest in a subsidiary and for the deconsolidation of a subsidiary. It clarifies that a noncontrolling interest in a subsidiary is an ownership interest in the consolidated entity that should be reported as equity in the consolidated financial statements. It requires consolidated net income to be reported at amounts that include the amounts attributable to both the parent and the noncontrolling interest. It also requires disclosure, on the face of the consolidated statement of income, of the amounts of consolidated net income attributable to the parent and to the noncontrolling interest. This Statement is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning on or after December 15, 2008 (that is, January 1, 2009, for entities with calendar year-ends). Earlier adoption is prohibited. The adoption of this statement did not have an impact on the Corporation’s financial statements, when adopted on January 1, 2009.
     In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS 141R, “Business Combinations.” This Statement retains the fundamental requirements in Statement 141 that the acquisition method of accounting (which Statement 141 called the purchase method) be used for all business combinations and for an acquirer to be identified for each business combination. This Statement defines the acquirer as the entity that obtains control of one or more businesses in the business combination and establishes the acquisition date as the date that the acquirer achieves control. This Statement requires an acquirer to recognize the assets acquired, the liabilities assumed, and any noncontrolling interest in the acquiree at the acquisition date, measured at their fair values as of that date, with limited exceptions specified in the Statement. This Statement applies prospectively to business combinations for which the acquisition date is on or after the beginning of the first annual reporting period beginning on or after December 15, 2008. An

F-20


FIRST BANCORP
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
entity may not apply it before that date. The adoption of this statement did not have an impact on the Corporation’s financial statements, when adopted on January 1, 2009.
     In March 2008, the FASB issued SFAS 161, “Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities – an amendment of FASB Statement No. 133.” This Statement changes the disclosure requirements for derivative instruments and hedging activities. Entities are required to provide enhanced disclosures about (a) how derivative instruments and related hedged items are accounted for under SFAS 133 and its related interpretations, and (b) how derivative instruments and related hedged items affect an entity’s financial position, financial performance, and cash flows. This Statement is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after November 15, 2008, with early application encouraged. The Corporation adopted the disclosure framework dictated by this Statement during 2008. Required disclosures are included in Note 30 – “Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities.”
     In May 2008, the FASB issued SFAS 162, “The Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles.” This Statement identifies the sources of accounting principles and the framework for selecting the principles to be used in the preparation ofauthoritative guidance on financial statements of nongovernmental entities that are presented in conformity with GAAP. Prior to the issuance of SFAS 162, GAAP hierarchy was defined in the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA) Statement on Auditing Standards No. (“SAS”) 69, “The Meaning of Present Fairly in Conformity With Generally Accepted Accounting Principles.” SFAS 162 obviates the need for the guidance applicable to auditors in SAS 69 by identifying the GAAP hierarchy for entities, since entities rather than auditors are responsible for selecting accounting principles for financial statements that are presented in conformity with GAAP. Any effect of applying the provisions of SFAS 162 should be reported as a change in accounting principle in accordance with SFAS 154, “Accounting Changes and Error Corrections.” SFAS 162 is effective 60 days following the SEC approval of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board’s amendments to AU Section 411, “The Meaning of Present Fairly in Conformity With Generally Accepted Accounting Principles,” which the SEC approved on September 16, 2008. The adoption of SFAS 162 did not impact the Corporation’s current accounting policies or the Corporation’s financial results.
     In May 2008, the FASB issued Staff Position No. (“FSP”) APB 14-1 (“FSP–APB 14-1”). FSP-APB 14-1 clarifies that convertible debt instruments that may be settled in cash upon conversion (including partial cash settlement) are not addressed by paragraph 12 of APB Opinion No. 14, “Accounting for Convertible Debt and Debt Issued with Stock Purchase Warrants.” Additionally, FSP-APB 14-1 specifies that issuers of such instruments should separately account for the liability and equity components in a manner that will reflect the entity’s nonconvertible debt borrowing rate when interest cost is recognized in subsequent periods. FSP-APB 14-1 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008, and interim periods within those fiscal years. As of December 31, 2008, the Corporation does not have any convertible debt instrument.
     In May 2008, the FASB issued SFAS 163, “Accounting for Financial Guarantee Insurance Contracts – an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 60.” This Statement requiresguarantee insurance contracts requiring that an insurance enterprise recognize a claim liability prior to an event of default (insured event) when there is evidence that credit deterioration has occurred in an insured financial obligation. This Statementguidance also clarifies how SFAS 60the accounting and reporting by insurance entities applies to financial guarantee insurance contracts, including the recognition and measurement to be used to account for premium revenue and claim liabilities. SFAS 163FASB authoritative

F-22


FIRST BANCORP
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
guidance on the accounting for financial guarantee insurance contracts is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008, and all interim periods within those fiscal years, except for some disclosures about the insurance enterprise’s risk-management activities. Except for those disclosures, earlier applicationactivities which are effective since the first interim period after the issuance of SFAS 163 is not permitted.this guidance. The Corporation is currently evaluating the possible effect, if any, of the adoption of this statementguidance did not have a significant impact on itsthe Corporation’s financial statements, commencing on January 1, 2009.statements.
     In June 2008, the FASB issued FSP EITF 03-6-1 (“FSP EITF 03-6-1”), “Determining Whether Instruments Grantedauthoritative guidance for determining whether instruments granted in Share-Based Payment Transactions Are Participating Securities.” FSP EITF 03-6-1shared-based payment transactions are participating securities. This guidance applies to entities with outstanding unvested share-based payment awards that contain rights to nonforfeitable dividends. Furthermore, awards with dividends that do not need to be returned to the entity if the employee forfeits the award are considered participating securities. Accordingly, under FSP EITF 03-6-1this guidance unvested share-based payment awards that are considered to be participating securities shouldmust be included in the computation of EPSearnings per share (“EPS”) pursuant to the two-class method under SFAS 128. FSP EITF 03-6-1as required by FASB guidance on earnings per share. FASB guidance on determining whether instruments granted in share based payment transactions are participating securities is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008, and interim periods within those years. Early applicationThe adoption of this Statement did not have an impact on the Corporation’s financial statements since, as of December 31, 2009, the outstanding unvested shares of restricted stock do not contain rights to nonforfeitable dividends.
     In April 2009, the FASB issued authoritative guidance for the accounting of assets acquired and liabilities assumed in a business combination that arise from contingencies. This guidance amends the provisions related to the initial recognition and measurement, subsequent measurement and disclosure of assets and liabilities arising from contingencies in a business combination. The guidance carries forward the requirement that acquired contingencies in a business combination be recognized at fair value on the acquisition date if fair value can be reasonably estimated during the allocation period. Otherwise, entities would typically account for the acquired contingencies based on a reasonable estimate in accordance with FASB guidance on the accounting for contingencies. This guidance is effective for assets or liabilities arising from contingencies in business combinations for which the acquisition date is on or after the beginning of the first annual reporting period beginning on or after December 15, 2008. The adoption of this Statement did not permitted.have an impact on the Corporation’s financial statements.
     In April 2009, the FASB issued authoritative guidance for determining fair value when the volume and level of activity for the asset or liability have significantly decreased and identifying transactions that are not orderly. This guidance relates to determining fair values when there is no active market or where the price inputs being used represent distressed sales. It reaffirms the objective of fair value measurement, that is, to reflect how much an asset would be sold for in an orderly transaction (as opposed to a distressed or forced transaction) at the date of the financial statements under current market conditions. Specifically, it reaffirms the need to use judgment to ascertain if a formerly active market has become inactive and in determining fair values when markets have become inactive. This guidance is effective for interim and annual reporting periods ending after June 15, 2009 on a prospective basis. The adoption of this Statement did not impact the Corporation’s fair value methodologies on its financial assets and laibilities.
     In April 2009, the FASB amended the existing guidance on determining whether an impairment for investments in debt securities is OTTI and requires an entity to recognize the credit component of an OTTI of a debt security in earnings and the noncredit component in other comprehensive income (“OCI”) when the entity does not intend to sell the security and it is more likely than not that the entity will not be required to sell the security prior to recovery. This guidance also requires expanded disclosures and became effective for interim and annual reporting periods ending after June 15, 2009. In connection with this guidance, the Corporation recorded $1.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2009 of OTTI charges through earnings that represents the credit loss of available-for-sale private label mortgage-backed securities. This guidance does not amend existing recognition and measurement guidance related to an OTTI of equity securities. The expanded disclosures related to this new guidance are included inNote 4 — Investment Securities.
     In April 2009, the FASB amended the existing guidance on the disclosure about fair values of financial instruments, which requires entities to disclose the method(s) and significant assumptions used to estimate the fair value of financial instruments, in both interim financial statements as well as annual financial statements. This

F-21F-23


FIRST BANCORP
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
is currently evaluating this statement in lightguidance became effective for interim reporting periods ending after June 15, 2009. The adoption of the recently approved Omnibus Incentive Plan, however, asamended guidance expanded the Corporation’s interim financial statement disclosures with regard to the fair value of December 31, 2008, the outstanding unvested shares of restricted stock do not contain rights to nonforfeitable dividends.financial instruments.
     In September 2008,May 2009, the FASB issued FSP No. FAS 133-1authoritative guidance on subsequent events, which establishes general standards of accounting for and FIN 45-4 (“FSP FAS 133-1disclosure of events that occur after the balance sheet date but before financial statements are issued or are available to be issued. This guidance sets forth (i) the period after the balance sheet date during which management of a reporting entity should evaluate events or transactions that may occur for potential recognition or disclosure in the financial statements, (ii) the circumstances under which an entity should recognize events or transactions occurring after the balance sheet date in its financial statements and FIN 45-4”), “Disclosures(iii) the disclosures that an entity should make about Credit Derivativesevents or transactions that occurred after the balance sheet date. This guidance is effective for interim or annual financial periods ending after June 15, 2009. There are not any material subsequent event that would require further disclosure.
     In June 2009, the FASB amended the existing guidance on the accounting for transfers of financial assets, which improves the relevance, representational faithfulness, and Certain Guarantees: An Amendment of FASB Statement No. 133 and FASB Interpretation No. 45; and Clarificationcomparability of the Effective Date of FASB Statement No. 161.” FSP FAS 133-1 and FIN 45-4 amends SFAS 133 to require disclosures by sellers of credit derivatives, including credit derivatives embeddedinformation that a reporting entity provides in its financial statements about a hybrid instrument. A seller of credit derivatives must disclose information about its credit derivatives and hybrid instruments that have embedded credit derivatives to enable userstransfer of financial statements to assess their potential effectassets; the effects of a transfer on its financial position, financial performance, and cash flows. As of December 31, 2008, the Corporationflows; and a transferor’s continuing involvement, if any, in transferred financial assets. This guidance is not involved in the credit derivatives market. This FSP also amends FIN 45, “Guarantor’s Accounting and Disclosure Requirements for Guarantees, Including Indirect Guarantees of Indebtedness of Others,” to require an additional disclosure about the current statuseffective as of the payment/performance riskbeginning of a guarantee. Further, this FSP clarifies the FASB’s intent about the effective date of SFAS 161. This FSP clarifies the FASB’s intent that the disclosures required by SFAS 161 should be provided for anyeach reporting entity’s first annual reporting period (annual or quarterly interim) beginningthat begins after November 15, 2008. The provisions of this FSP2009, for interim periods within that amend SFAS 133first annual reporting period and FIN 45 will be effective for interim and annual reporting periods (annualthereafter. Subsequently in December 2009, the FASB amended the existing guidance issued in June 2009. Among the most significant changes and additions to this guidance includes changes to the conditions for sales of a financial assets which objective is to determine whether a transferor and its consolidated affiliates included in the financial statements have surrendered control over transferred financial assets or interim) ending after November 15, 2008.third-party beneficial interests; and the addition of the meaning of the term participating interest which represents a proportionate (pro rata) ownership interest in an entire financial asset. The Corporation is evaluating the impact the adoption of this pronouncement did notthe guidance will have a significant impact on the Corporation’sits financial statements.
     In October 2008,June 2009, the FASB amended the existing guidance on the consolidation of variable interest, which improves financial reporting by enterprises involved with variable interest entities and addresses (i) the effects on certain provisions of the amended guidance, as a result of the elimination of the qualifying special-purpose entity concept in the accounting for transfer of financial assets guidance and (ii) constituent concerns about the application of certain key provisions of the guidance, including those in which the accounting and disclosures do not always provide timely and useful information about an enterprise’s involvement in a variable interest entity. This guidance is effective as of the beginning of each reporting entity’s first annual reporting period that begins after November 15, 2009, for interim periods within that first annual reporting period, and for interim and annual reporting periods thereafter. Subsequently in December 2009, the FASB amended the existing guidance issued in June 2009. Among the most significant changes and additions to this guidance includes the replacement of the quantitative-based risks and rewards calculation for determining which reporting entity, if any, has a controlling financial interest in a variable interest entity with an approach focused on identifying which reporting entity has the power to direct the activities of a variable interest entity that most significantly impact the entity’s economic performance and the obligation to absorb losses of the entity or the right to receive benefits from the entity. The Corporation is evaluating the impact, if any, the adoption of this guidance will have on its financial statements.
     In June 2009, the FASB issued FSP No. FAS 157-3authoritative guidance on the FASB Accounting Standards Codification and the Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles. The FASB Accounting Standards Codification (“FSP FAS 157-3”Codification”), “Determining is the Fair Valuesingle source of authoritative nongovernmental GAAP. Rules and interpretive releases of the SEC under the authority of federal securities laws are also sources of authoritative GAAP for SEC registrants. The Codification project does not change GAAP in any way shape or form; it only reorganizes the existing pronouncements into one single source of U.S. GAAP. This guidance is effective for interim and annual periods ending after September 15, 2009. All existing accounting standards are superseded as described in this guidance. All other accounting literature not included in the Codification is nonauthoritative. Following this guidance, the FASB will not issue new guidance in the form of Statements, FASB Staff Positions, or Emerging Issues Task Force Abstracts. Instead, it will issue Accounting Standards Updates (“ASUs”). The FASB will not consider ASUs as

F-24


FIRST BANCORP
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
authoritative in their own right. ASUs will serve only to update the Codification, provide background information about the guidance, and provide the bases for conclusions on the change(s) in the Codification.
     In August 2009, the FASB updated the Codification in connection with the fair value measurement of liabilities to clarify that in circumstances in which a Financial Asset Whenquoted price in an active market for the Market for That Asset Is Not Active.” FSP FAS 157-3 clarifies the application of SFAS 157 in a market thatidentical liability is not active and provides an exampleavailable, a reporting entity is required to illustrate key considerations in determiningmeasure fair value using one or more of the following techniques:
1.A valuation technique that uses:
a.The quoted price of the identical liability when traded as an asset
b.Quoted prices for similar liabilities or similar liabilities when traded as assets
2.Another valuation technique that is consistent with the principles of fair value measurement. Two examples would be an income approach, such as a present value technique, or a market approach, such as a technique that is based on the amount at the measurement date that the reporting entity would pay to transfer the identical liability or would receive to enter into the identical liability.
     The update also clarifies that when estimating the fair value of a financial asset whenliability, a reporting entity is not required to include a separate input or adjustment to other inputs relating to the existence of a restriction that prevents the transfer of the liability. The update also clarifies that both a quoted price in an active market for that financialthe identical liability at the measurement date and the quoted price for the identical liability when traded as an asset in an active market when no adjustment to the quoted price of the asset are required are Level 1 fair value measurements. This update is not active. This FSP became effective on October 10, 2008 and also applies to prior periods for which financial statements have not been issued.the first reporting period (including interim periods) beginning after issuance. The adoption of this pronouncementguidance did not impact the Corporation’s fair value methodologies on its financial assets.liabilities.
     In December 2008,September 2009, the FASB issued FSP No. FAS 140-4updated the Codification to reflect SEC staff pronouncements on earnings-per-share calculations. According to the update, the SEC staff believes that when a public company redeems preferred shares, the difference between the fair value of the consideration transferred to the holders of the preferred stock and FIN 46(R)-8, “Disclosures by Public Entities (Enterprises) about Transfersthe carrying amount on the balance sheet after issuance costs of Financial Assets and Intereststhe preferred stock should be added to or subtracted from net income before doing an earnings per share calculation. The SEC’s staff also thinks it is not appropriate to aggregate preferred shares with different dividend yields when trying to determine whether the “if-converted” method is dilutive to the earnings per-share calculation. As of December 31, 2009, the Corporation has not been involved in Variable Interest Entities.” This FSP amends SFAS 140, to require public entitiesa redemption or induced conversion of preferred stock.
     In January 2010, the FASB updated the Codification to provide additional disclosures about transfersguidance on accounting for distributions to shareholders with components of financial assets. It also amends FIN 46 (revised December 2003), “Consolidationstock and cash. This guidance clarifies that the stock portion of Variable Interest Entities,”a distribution to require public enterprises, including sponsorsshareholders that haveallows them to elect to receive cash or stock with a variable interestpotential limitation on the total amount of cash that all shareholders can elect to receive in the aggregate is considered a variable interest entity, to provide additional disclosures about their involvement with variable interest entities. Additionally, this FSP requires certain disclosures to be provided by a public enterpriseshare issuance that is (a)reflected in EPS prospectively and is not a sponsor of a qualifying special purpose entity (“SPE”) that holds a variable interest in the qualifying SPE but was not the transferor (nontransferor) of financial assets to the qualifying SPE and (b) a servicer of a qualifying SPE that holds a significant variable interest in the qualifying SPE but was not the transferor (nontransferor) of financial assets to the qualifying SPE.stock dividend. The disclosures required by this FSP are intended to provide greater transparency to financial statement users about a transferor’s continuing involvement with transferred financial assets and an enterprise’s involvement with variable interest entities and qualifying SPEs. This FSP becamenew guidance is effective for the first reporting period (interiminterim and annual periods ending on or annual) ending after December 15, 2008, with earlier application encouraged.2009, and would be applied on a retrospective basis. The adoption of this guidance did not impact the Corporation’s financial statements.
     In January 2010, the FASB updated the Codification to provide guidance to improve disclosure requirements related to fair value measurements and require reporting entities to make new disclosures about recurring or nonrecurring fair-value measurements including significant transfers into and out of Level 1 and Level 2 fair-value measurements and information on purchases, sales, issuances, and settlements on a gross basis in the reconciliation of Level 3 fair-value measurements. The FASB also clarified existing fair-value measurement disclosure guidance about the level of disaggregation, inputs, and valuation techniques. Entities will be required to separately disclose significant transfers into and out of Level 1 and Level 2 measurements in the fair-value hierarchy and the reasons for the transfers. Significance will be determined based on earnings and total assets or total liabilities or, when changes in fair value are recognized in other comprehensive income, based on total equity. A reporting entity must disclose and consistently follow its policy for determining when transfers between levels are recognized. Acceptable methods for determining when to recognize transfers include: (i) actual date of the event or change in circumstances causing the transfer; (ii) beginning of the reporting period; and (iii) end of the reporting period. Currently, entities are only required to disclose activity in Level 3 measurements in the fair-value hierarchy on a net basis. This FSP shallguidance will require separate disclosures for purchases, sales, issuances, and settlements of assets. Entities will also have to

F-25


FIRST BANCORP
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
disclose the reasons for the activity and apply the same guidance on significance and transfer policies required for transfers between Level 1 and 2 measurements. The guidance requires disclosure of fair-value measurements by “class” instead of “major category.” A class is generally a subset of assets and liabilities within a financial statement line item and is based on the specific nature and risks of the assets and liabilities and their classification in the fair-value hierarchy. When determining classes, reporting entities must also consider the level of disaggregated information required by other applicable GAAP. For fair-value measurements using significant observable inputs (Level 2) or significant unobservable inputs (Level 3), this guidance requires reporting entities to disclose the valuation technique and the inputs used in determining fair value for each class of assets and liabilities. If the valuation technique has changed in the reporting period (e.g., from a market approach to an income approach) or if an additional valuation technique is used, entities are required to disclose the change and the reason for making the change. Except for the detailed Level 3 roll forward disclosures, the guidance is effective for annual and interim reporting period thereafter.periods beginning after December 15, 2009 (first quarter of 2010 for public companies with calendar year-ends). The adoption of this Statement did not have a significant impact on the Corporation’s financial statements as the Corporation is not materially involvenew disclosures about purchases, sales, issuances, and settlements in the transfer of financial assets through securitization and asset-backed financing arrangements, nor have involvement with variable interest entities.
     In January 2009, the FASB issued FSP No. EITF 99-20-1 (“FSP EITF 99-20-1”), “Amendments to the Impairment Guidance of EITF Issue No. 99-20.” This FSP amends the impairment guidance in EITF Issue No. 99-20, “Recognition of Interest Income and Impairment on Purchased Beneficial Interests and Beneficial Interests That Continue to Be Held by a Transferor in Securitized Financial Assets,” to achieve more consistent determination of whether an other-than-temporary impairment has occurred. The FSP also retains and emphasizes the objective of an other-than-temporary impairment assessment and the related disclosure requirements in SFAS 115, “Accountingroll forward activity for Certain Investments in Debt and Equity Securities,” and other related guidance. The FSP becameLevel 3 fair-value measurements are effective for interim and annual reporting periods endingbeginning after December 15, 2008, and must be applied prospectively. Retrospective application2010 (first quarter of 2011 for public companies with calendar year-ends). Early adoption is permitted. In the initial adoption period, entities are not required to a prior interim or annual reporting periodinclude disclosures for previous comparative periods; however, they are required for periods ending after initial adoption. The Corporation is not permitted. Theevaluating the impact the adoption of this Statement did notguidance will have a significant impact on the Corporation’sits financial statements.

F-22F-26


FIRST BANCORP
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
Note 2 — Restrictions on Cash and Due from Banks
     The Corporation’s bank subsidiary, FirstBank, is required by law, as enforced by the OCIF, to maintain minimum average weekly reserve balances to cover demand deposits. The amount of those minimum average reserve balances for the week that coverscovered December 31, 20082009 was $233.7$91.3 million (2007(2008$220$233.7 million). As of December 31, 20082009 and 2007,2008, the Bank complied with the requirement. Cash and due from banks as well as other short-term, highly liquid securities are used to cover the required average reserve balances.
     As of December 31, 20082009 and 2007,2008, and as required by the Puerto Rico International Banking Law, the Corporation maintained separately for two of its international banking entities (IBEs), $600,000 in time deposits, which were considered restricted assets equally split between the two IBEs.
Note 3 — Money Market Investments
     Money market investments are composed of federal funds sold, time deposits with other financial institutions and short-term investments with original maturities of three months or less.
     Money market investments as of December 31, 20082009 and 20072008 were as follows:
         
  2008  2007 
  Balance 
  (Dollars in thousands) 
Federal funds sold, interest 0.01% (2007 - 4.05%) $54,469  $7,957 
Time deposits with other financial institutions, interest 1.05% (2007-weighted-average interest rate of 3.92%)  600   26,600 
Other short-term investments, weighted-average interest rate of 0.21% (2007-weighted-average interest rate of 3.86%)  20,934   148,579 
       
  $76,003  $183,136 
       
         
  2009  2008 
  Balance 
  (Dollars in thousands) 
Federal funds sold, interest 0.01% (2008 - 0.01%) $1,140  $54,469 
Time deposits with other financial institutions, weighted-average interest rate 0.24% (2008-interest 1.05%)  600   600 
Other short-term investments, weighted-average interest rate of 0.18% (2008-weighted-average interest rate of 0.21%)  22,546   20,934 
       
  $24,286  $76,003 
       
     As of December 31, 2009, $0.95 million of the Corporation’s money market investments was pledged as collateral for interest rate swaps. As of December 31, 2008, and 2007, none of the Corporation’s money market investments were pledged.

F-23F-27


FIRST BANCORP
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
Note 4 — Investment Securities
Investment Securities Available-for-SaleAvailable for Sale
     The amortized cost, non-credit loss component of OTTI securities recorded in OCI, gross unrealized gains and losses recorded in OCI, approximate fair value, weighted-average yield and contractual maturities of investment securities available-for-saleavailable for sale as of December 31, 20082009 and 20072008 were as follows:
                                                                                  
 December 31, 2008 December 31, 2007  December 31, 2009   
 Gross Weighted Gross Weighted  Non-Credit December 31, 2008 
 Amortized Unrealized Fair average Amortized Unrealized Fair average  Loss Component Gross Weighted Gross Weighted 
 cost gains losses value yield% cost gains losses value yield%  Amortized of OTTI Unrealized Fair average Amortized Unrealized Fair average 
 (Dollars in thousands)  cost Recorded in OCI gains losses value yield% cost gains losses value yield% 
U.S. Treasury and Obligations of
U.S. Government
sponsored agencies:
 
After 5 to 10 years $ $ $ $  $6,975 $26 $ $7,001 6.05 
After 10 years      8,984 47  9,031 6.21 
 (Dollars in thousands) 
Obligations of U.S. Government sponsored agencies: 
After 1 to 5 years $1,139,577 $ $5,562 $ $1,145,139 2.12 $ $ $ $  
 
Puerto Rico Government obligations:  
Due within one year 4,593 46  4,639 6.18       12,016  1 28 11,989 1.82 4,593 46  4,639 6.18 
After 1 to 5 years 110,624 259 479 110,404 5.41 13,947 141 347 13,741 4.99  113,232  302 47 113,487 5.40 110,624 259 479 110,404 5.41 
After 5 to 10 years 6,365 283 128 6,520 5.80 7,245 247 99 7,393 5.67  6,992  328 90 7,230 5.88 6,365 283 128 6,520 5.80 
After 10 years 15,789 45 264 15,570 5.30 3,416 37 66 3,387 5.64  3,529  91  3,620 5.42 15,789 45 264 15,570 5.30 
                                    
United States and Puerto Rico Government obligations 137,371 633 871 137,133 5.44 40,567 498 512 40,553 5.62  1,275,346  6,284 165 1,281,465 2.44 137,371 633 871 137,133 5.44 
                                    
Mortgage-backed securities:  
FHLMC certificates:  
Due within one year 37   37 5.94 98 1  99 5.50        37   37 5.94 
After 1 to 5 years 157 2  159 7.07 640 20  660 7.01  30    30 5.54 157 2  159 7.07 
After 5 to 10 years 31 3  34 8.40             31 3  34 8.40 
After 10 years 1,846,386 45,743 1 1,892,128 5.46 158,070 235 111 158,194 5.60  705,818  18,388 1,987 722,219 4.66 1,846,386 45,743 1 1,892,128 5.46 
                                        
 1,846,611 45,748 1 1,892,358 5.46 158,808 256 111 158,953 5.61  705,848  18,388 1,987 722,249 4.66 1,846,611 45,748 1 1,892,358 5.46 
                                    
GNMA certificates:  
Due within one year 45 1  46 5.72             45 1  46 5.72 
After 1 to 5 years 180 6  186 6.71 496 8  504 6.48  69  3  72 6.56 180 6  186 6.71 
After 5 to 10 years 566 9  575 5.33 708 6 5 709 6.01  808  39  847 5.47 566 9  575 5.33 
After 10 years 331,594 10,283 10 341,867 5.38 42,665 582 120 43,127 5.93  407,565  10,808 980 417,393 5.12 331,594 10,283 10 341,867 5.38 
                                        
 332,385 10,299 10 342,674 5.38 43,869 596 125 44,340 5.94  408,442  10,850 980 418,312 5.12 332,385 10,299 10 342,674 5.38 
                                        
FNMA certificates:  
After 1 to 5 years 53 5  58 10.20 34 1  35 7.08        53 5  58 10.20 
After 5 to 10 years 269,716 4,678  274,394 4.96 289,125 138 750 288,513 4.93  101,781  3,716 91 105,406 4.55 269,716 4,678  274,394 4.96 
After 10 years 1,071,521 28,005 1 1,099,525 5.60 608,942 5,290 582 613,650 5.65  1,374,533  30,629 2,776 1,402,386 4.51 1,071,521 28,005 1 1,099,525 5.60 
                                        
 1,341,290 32,688 1 1,373,977 5.47 898,101 5,429 1,332 902,198 5.42  1,476,314  34,345 2,867 1,507,792 4.51 1,341,290 32,688 1 1,373,977 5.47 
                                    
Mortgage pass-through certificates: 
 
Collateralized Mortgage Obligations issued or guaranteed by FHLMC, FNMA and GNMA: 
After 10 years 144,217 2 30,236 113,983 5.43 162,082 3 28,407 133,678 6.14  156,086  633 412 156,307 0.99      
                                    
Mortgage-backed securities 3,664,503 88,737 30,248 3,722,992 5.46 1,262,860 6,284 29,975 1,239,169 5.55 
 
Other mortgage pass-through trust certificates: 
After 10 years 117,198 32,846 2  84,354 2.30 144,217 2 30,236 113,983 5.43 
                   
 
Total mortgage-backed securities 2,863,888 32,846 64,218 6,246 2,889,014 4.35 3,664,503 88,737 30,248 3,722,992 5.46 
                                    
Corporate bonds:  
After 5 to 10 years 241   241 7.70 1,300  198 1,102 7.70        241   241 7.70 
After 10 years 1,307   1,307 7.97 4,412  1,066 3,346 7.97        1,307   1,307 7.97 
                                    
Corporate bonds 1,548   1,548 7.93 5,712  1,264 4,448 7.91        1,548   1,548 7.93 
                                    
Equity securities (without contractual maturity) 814  145 669 2.38 2,638  522 2,116  
 
Equity securities (without contractual maturity) (1) 427  81 205 303  814  145 669 2.38 
                                    
  
Total investment securities available for sale $3,804,236 $89,370 $31,264 $3,862,342 5.46 $1,311,777 $6,782 $32,273 $1,286,286 5.55  $4,139,661 $32,846 $70,583 $6,616 $4,170,782 3.76 $3,804,236 $89,370 $31,264 $3,862,342 5.46 
                                    
(1)Represents common shares of other financial institutions in Puerto Rico.
     Maturities of mortgage-backed securities are based on contractual terms assuming no prepayments. Expected maturities of investments might differ from contractual maturities because they may be subject to prepayments and/or call options. The weighted-average yield on investment securities available for sale is based on amortized cost and, therefore, does not give effect to changes in fair value. The net unrealized gain or loss on securities available for sale isand the non-credit loss component of OTTI are presented as part of accumulated other comprehensive income.OCI.

F-24F-28


FIRST BANCORP
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
     The aggregate amortized cost and approximate market value of investment securities available for sale as of December 31, 2008,2009, by contractual maturity, are shown below:
                
 Amortized Cost Fair Value  Amortized Cost Fair Value 
 (In thousands)  (In thousands) 
Within 1 year $4,675 $4,722  $12,016 $11,989 
After 1 to 5 years 111,014 110,807  1,252,908 1,258,728 
After 5 to 10 years 276,919 281,764  109,581 113,483 
After 10 years 3,410,814 3,464,380  2,764,729 2,786,279 
          
Total 3,803,422 3,861,673  4,139,234 4,170,479 
 
Equity securities 814 669  427 303 
     
      
Total investment securities available for sale $3,804,236 $3,862,342  $4,139,661 $4,170,782 
          
     The following tables show the Corporation’s available-for-sale investments’ fair value and gross unrealized losses, aggregated by investment category and length of time that individual securities have been in a continuous unrealized loss position, as of December 31, 20082009 and 2007:
                         
  As of December 31, 2008 
  Less than 12 months  12 months or more  Total 
      Unrealized      Unrealized      Unrealized 
  Fair Value  Losses  Fair Value  Losses  Fair Value  Losses 
          (In thousands)         
Debt securities
                        
                         
Puerto Rico Government obligations $  $  $13,288  $871  $13,288  $871 
Mortgage-backed securities
                        
FHLMC  68   1         68   1 
GNMA  903   10         903   10 
FNMA  361   1   21      382   1 
Mortgage pass-through trust certificates        113,685   30,236   113,685   30,236 
Equity securities
  318   145         318   145 
                   
  $1,650  $157  $126,994  $31,107  $128,644  $31,264 
                   
                         
  As of December 31, 2007 
  Less than 12 months  12 months or more  Total 
      Unrealized      Unrealized      Unrealized 
  Fair Value  Losses  Fair Value  Losses  Fair Value  Losses 
          (In thousands)         
Debt securities
                        
Puerto Rico Government obligations $  $  $13,648  $512  $13,648  $512 
Mortgage-backed securities
                        
FHLMC  48,202   40   3,436   71   51,638   111 
GNMA  625   11   26,887   114   27,512   125 
FNMA  285,973   274   221,902   1,058   507,875   1,332 
Mortgage pass-through certificates  133,337   28,407         133,337   28,407 
Corporate bonds
        4,448   1,264   4,448   1,264 
Equity securities
  1,384   522         1,384   522 
                   
  $469,521  $29,254  $270,321  $3,019  $739,842  $32,273 
                   
The Corporation’s investment2008. It also includes debt securities portfolio is comprised principally of (i) fixed-rate mortgage-backed securities issued or guaranteed by FNMA, GNMA or FHLMCfor which an OTTI was recognized and other securities secured by mortgage loans (ii) U.S. Treasury and agency securities and obligations ofonly the Puerto Rico Government. Thus, payment of substantial portion of these instruments is either guaranteed or secured by mortgages together with a guarantee of U.S. government-sponsored entity or is backed by the full faith and credit of the U.S. or Puerto Rico Government. In connection with the placement of FNMA and FHLMC into conservatorship by the U.S. Treasury in September 2008, the Treasury committed to invest as much as $200 billion in preferred stock and extend credit through 2009 to keep the agencies solvent and operating and to, among other things, protect debt and mortgage-backed securities of

F-25


FIRST BANCORP
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
the agencies. Furthermore, the announcement of the Federal Reserve that it will invest up to $600 billion in obligations from U.S. government-sponsored agencies, including $500 billion in mortgage-backed securities backed by FNMA, FHLMC and GNMA has caused a surge in prices, since the latter part of 2008. Principal and interest on these securities are deemed recoverable. The unrealized losses in the available-for-sale portfolio as of December 31, 2008 are substantiallyamount related to certain private label mortgage-backed securities due to increasesa credit loss was recognized in the discount rate used to value such instruments resulting from lack of liquidity and credit concerns in the U.S. mortgage loan market. Refer to Note 1 for additional information with respect to the methodology to determine the fair value of the private label mortgage-backed securities. The underlying mortgages are fixed-rate single family loans with high weighted-average FICO scores (over 700) and moderate loan-to-value ratios (under 80%), as well as moderate delinquency levels. Principal and interest cash flow expectations have not changed to a material degree and are expected to cover the carrying amount of these mortgage-backed securities. Private label mortgage-backed securities relates to mortgage pass-through certificates bought from R&G Financial Corporation (“R&G Financial”). R&G Financial must cover losses up to 10% of the aggregate outstanding balance according to recourse provisions included in the agreements. The Corporation’s investment in equity securities is minimal and it does not own any equity securities of U.S. financial institutions that recently failed in the midst of the current market turmoil. The Corporation’s policy is to review its investment portfolio for possible other-than-temporary impairment at least quarterly. As of December 31, 2008, management has the intent and ability to hold these investments for a reasonable period of time for a forecasted recovery of fair value up to (or beyond) the cost of these investments; as a result, there is no other-than-temporary impairment.earnings:
     During the year ended December 31, 2008, the Corporation recorded other-than-temporary impairments of approximately $6.0 million (2007 — $5.9 million, 2006 — $15.3 million) on certain corporate bonds and equity securities held in its available-for-sale portfolio. Of the $6.0 million other-than-temporary impairments recorded in 2008 approximately $4.2 million relates to auto industry corporate bonds held by FirstBank Florida. Management concluded that the declines in value of the securities were other-than-temporary; as such, the cost basis of these securities was written down to the market value as of the date of the analyses and reflected in earnings as a realized loss. The Corporation’s remaining exposure to auto industry corporate bonds as of December 31, 2008 amounted to $1.5 million.
                         
  As of December 31, 2009 
  Less than 12 months  12 months or more  Total 
      Unrealized      Unrealized      Unrealized 
  Fair Value  Losses  Fair Value  Losses  Fair Value  Losses 
          (In thousands)         
Debt securities
                        
                         
Puerto Rico Government obligations $14,760  $118  $9,113  $47  $23,873  $165 
Mortgage-backed securities
                        
FHLMC  236,925   1,987         236,925   1,987 
GNMA  72,178   980         72,178   980 
FNMA  415,601   2,867         415,601   2,867 
Collateralized mortgage obligations issued or guaranteed by FHLMC, FNMA and GNMA  105,075   412         105,075   412 
Other mortgage pass-through trust certificates        84,105   32,846   84,105   32,846 
Equity securities
  90   205         90   205 
                   
  $844,629  $6,569  $93,218  $32,893  $937,847  $39,462 
                   
     Total proceeds from the sale of securities during the year ended December 31, 2008 amounted to approximately $680.0 million (2007 — $960.8 million, 2006 — $232.5 million). The Corporation realized gross gains of approximately $17.9 million (2007 — $5.1 million, 2006 — $7.3 million), and realized gross losses of approximately $0.2 million (2007 — $1.9 million, 2006 — $0.2 million).
                         
  As of December 31, 2008 
  Less than 12 months  12 months or more  Total 
      Unrealized      Unrealized      Unrealized 
  Fair Value  Losses  Fair Value  Losses  Fair Value  Losses 
          (In thousands)         
Debt securities
                        
                         
Puerto Rico Government obligations $  $  $13,288  $871  $13,288  $871 
Mortgage-backed securities
                        
FHLMC  68   1         68   1 
GNMA  903   10         903   10 
FNMA  361   1   21      382   1 
Other mortgage pass-through trust certificates        113,685   30,236   113,685   30,236 
Equity securities
  318   145         318   145 
                   
  $1,650  $157  $126,994  $31,107  $128,644  $31,264 
                   

F-26F-29


FIRST BANCORP
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
Investments Held-to-MaturityHeld to Maturity
     The amortized cost, gross unrealized gains and losses, approximate fair value, weighted-average yield and contractual maturities of investment securities held-to-maturityheld to maturity as of December 31, 20082009 and 20072008 were as follows:
                                                                                
 December 31, 2008 December 31, 2007  December 31, 2009 December 31, 2008 
 Gross Weighted Gross Weighted  Gross Weighted Gross Weighted 
 Amortized Unrealized Fair average Amortized Unrealized Fair average  Amortized Unrealized Fair average Amortized Unrealized Fair average 
 cost gains losses value yield% cost gains losses value yield%  cost gains losses value yield% cost gains losses value yield% 
 (Dollars in thousands)  (Dollars in thousands) 
U.S. Treasury securities:  
Due within 1 year $8,455 $34 $ $8,489 1.07 $254,882 $369 $24 $255,227 4.14  $8,480 $12 $ $8,492 0.47 $8,455 $34 $ $8,489 1.07 
  
Obligations of other U.S. Government sponsored agencies:  
After 10 years 945,061 5,281 728 949,614 5.77 2,110,265 1,486 2,160 2,109,591 5.82       945,061 5,281 728 949,614 5.77 
Puerto Rico Government obligations:  
After 5 to 10 years 17,924 480 97 18,307 5.85 17,302 541 107 17,736 5.85  18,584 564 93 19,055 5.86 17,924 480 97 18,307 5.85 
After 10 years 5,145 35  5,180 5.50 13,920  256 13,664 5.50  4,995 77  5,072 5.50 5,145 35  5,180 5.50 
                                  
United States and Puerto Rico Government obligations 976,585 5,830 825 981,590 5.73 2,396,369 2,396 2,547 2,396,218 5.64 
United States and Puerto 
Rico Government obligations 32,059 653 93 32,619 4.38 976,585 5,830 825 981,590 5.73 
                                  
  
Mortgage-backed securities:  
FHLMC certificates:  
After 1 to 5 years 8,338 71 5 8,404 3.83       5,015 78  5,093 3.79 8,338 71 5 8,404 3.83 
After 5 to 10 years      11,274  116 11,158 3.65 
 
FNMA certificates:  
After 1 to 5 years 7,567 88  7,655 3.85       4,771 100  4,871 3.87 7,567 88  7,655 3.85 
After 5 to 10 years 686,948 9,227  696,175 4.46 69,553  1,067 68,486 4.30  533,593 19,548  553,141 4.47 686,948 9,227  696,175 4.46 
After 10 years 25,226 247 25 25,448 5.31 797,887 61 13,785 784,163 4.42  24,181 479  24,660 5.30 25,226 247 25 25,448 5.31 
                                  
Mortgage-backed securities 728,079 9,633 30 737,682 4.48 878,714 61 14,968 863,807 4.40  567,560 20,205  587,765 4.49 728,079 9,633 30 737,682 4.48 
                                  
  
Corporate bonds:  
After 10 years 2,000  860 1,140 5.80 2,000  91 1,909 5.80  2,000  800 1,200 5.80 2,000  860 1,140 5.80 
                                  
  
Total investment securities held-to-maturity $1,706,664 $15,463 $1,715 $1,720,412 5.19 $3,277,083 $2,457 $17,606 $3,261,934 5.31  $601,619 $20,858 $893 $621,584 4.49 $1,706,664 $15,463 $1,715 $1,720,412 5.19 
                                  
     Maturities of mortgage-backed securities are based on contractual terms assuming no prepayments. Expected maturities of investments might differ from contractual maturities because they may be subject to prepayments and/or call options.options as was the case with approximately $945 million of U.S. government agency debt securities called during 2009.
     The aggregate amortized cost and approximate market value of investment securities held-to-maturityheld to maturity as of December 31, 2008,2009, by contractual maturity are shown below:
                
 Amortized Cost Fair Value  Amortized Cost Fair Value 
 (In thousands)  (In thousands) 
Within 1 year $8,455 $8,489  $8,480 $8,492 
After 1 to 5 years 15,905 16,059  9,786 9,964 
After 5 to 10 years 704,872 714,482  552,177 572,196 
After 10 years 977,432 981,382  31,176 30,932 
          
Total investment securities held to maturity $1,706,664 $1,720,412  $601,619 $621,584 
          
     From time to time the Corporation has securities held to maturity with an original maturity of three months or less that are considered cash and cash equivalents and classified as money market investments in the Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition. As of December 31, 2009 and 2008, the Corporation had no outstanding securities held to maturity that were classified as cash and cash equivalents. The following table sets forth the securities held to maturity with an original maturity of three months or less outstanding as of December 31, 2007.

F-27F-30


FIRST BANCORP
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
                 
  December 31, 2007 
      Gross    
  Amortized  Unrealized  Fair 
  Cost  Gains  Losses  Value 
      (In thousands)     
U.S. government and U.S. government sponsored agencies:                
Due within 30 days $45,994  $3  $  $45,997 
After 30 days up to 60 days  21,932   1   10   21,923 
After 30 days up to 90 days  79,191   41      79,232 
             
  $147,117  $45  $10  $147,152 
             
     The following tables show the Corporation’s held-to-maturity investments’ fair value and gross unrealized losses, aggregated by investment category and length of time that individual securities have been in a continuous unrealized loss position, as of December 31, 20082009 and 2007:2008:
                         
  As of December 31, 2009 
  Less than 12 months  12 months or more  Total 
      Unrealized      Unrealized      Unrealized 
  Fair Value  Losses  Fair Value  Losses  Fair Value  Losses 
  (In thousands) 
Debt securities
                        
Puerto Rico Government obligations $  $  $4,678  $93  $4,678  $93 
Corporate bonds
        1,200   800   1,200   800 
                   
  $  $  $5,878  $893  $5,878  $893 
                   
                         
  As of December 31, 2008 
  Less than 12 months  12 months or more  Total 
      Unrealized      Unrealized      Unrealized 
  Fair Value  Losses  Fair Value  Losses  Fair Value  Losses 
  (In thousands) 
Debt securities
                        
U.S. Government sponsored agencies $  $  $7,262  $728  $7,262  $728 
Puerto Rico Government obligations        4,436   97   4,436   97 
Mortgage-backed securities
                        
FHLMC        600   5   600   5 
FNMA        6,825   25   6,825   25 
Corporate bonds
        1,140   860   1,140   860 
                   
  $  $  $20,263  $1,715  $20,263  $1,715 
                   
                         
  As of December 31, 2007 
  Less than 12 months  12 months or more  Total 
      Unrealized      Unrealized      Unrealized 
  Fair Value  Losses  Fair Value  Losses  Fair Value  Losses 
          (In thousands)         
Debt securities
                        
U.S. Government sponsored agencies $616,572  $1,568  $24,469  $592  $641,041  $2,160 
U.S. Treasury Notes  24,697   24         24,697   24 
Puerto Rico Government obligations  13,664   256   4,200   107   17,864   363 
Mortgage-backed securities
                        
FHLMC        11,158   116   11,158   116 
FNMA        849,341   14,852   849,341   14,852 
Corporate Bonds
  1,909   91         1,909   91 
                   
  $656,842  $1,939  $889,168  $15,667  $1,546,010  $17,606 
                   
Assessment for OTTI
     Held-to-maturity securities inOn a quarterly basis, the Corporation performs an assessment to determine whether there have been any events or economic circumstances indicating that a security with an unrealized loss position as of December 31, 2008 are primarily fixed-rate mortgage-backed securities and U.S. agency securities.has suffered OTTI. A debt security is considered impaired if the fair value is less than its amortized cost basis at the reporting date. The vast majority of them are ratedaccounting literature requires the equivalent of AAA by major rating agencies. TheCorporation to assess whether the unrealized loss is other-than-temporary. Prior to April 1, 2009, unrealized losses that were determined to be temporary were recorded, net of tax, in other comprehensive income for available for sale securities, whereas unrealized losses related to held-to-maturity securities determined to be temporary were not recognized. Regardless of whether the security was classified as available for sale or held to maturity, unrealized losses that were determined to be other-than-temporary were recorded through earnings. An unrealized loss was considered other-than-temporary if (i) it was probable that the holder would not collect all amounts due according to the contractual terms of the debt security, or (ii) the fair value was below the amortized cost of the debt security for a prolonged period of time and the Corporation did not have the positive intent and ability to hold the security until recovery or maturity.
     In April 2009, the FASB amended the OTTI model for debt securities. Under the new guidance, OTTI losses must be recognized in earnings if an investor has the intent to sell the debt security or it is more likely than not that it will be required to sell the debt security before recovery of its amortized cost basis. However, even if an investor does not expect to sell a debt security, it must evaluate expected cash flows to be received and determine if a credit loss has occurred.
     Under the new guidance, an unrealized loss is generally deemed to be other-than-temporary and a credit loss is deemed to exist if the present value of the expected future cash flows is less than the amortized cost basis of the debt security. As a result of the Corporation’s adoption of this new guidance, the credit loss component of an OTTI is recorded as a component of Net impairment losses on investment securities in the accompanying consolidated statements of (loss) income, while the remaining portion of the impairment loss is recognized in OCI, provided the

F-31


FIRST BANCORP
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
Corporation does not intend to sell the underlying debt security and it is “more likely than not” that the Corporation will not have to sell the debt security prior to recovery.
     Debt securities issued by U.S. government agencies, government-sponsored entities and the U.S. Treasury accounted for more than 94% of the total available-for-sale and held-to-maturity portfolio as of December 31, 20082009 and no credit losses are substantiallyexpected, given the explicit and implicit guarantees provided by the U.S. federal government. The Corporation’s assessment was concentrated mainly on private label MBS of approximately $117 million for which the Corporation evaluates credit losses on a quarterly basis. The Corporation considered the following factors in determining whether a credit loss exists and the period over which the debt security is expected to recover:
The length of time and the extent to which the fair value has been less than the amortized cost basis.
Changes in the near term prospects of the underlying collateral of a security such as changes in default rates, loss severity given default and significant changes in prepayment assumptions;
The level of cash flows generated from the underlying collateral supporting the principal and interest payments of the debt securities; and
Any adverse change to the credit conditions and liquidity of the issuer, taking into consideration the latest information available about the overall financial condition of the issuer, credit ratings, recent legislation and government actions affecting the issuer’s industry and actions taken by the issuer to deal with the present economic climate.
     For the year ended December 31, 2009, the Corporation recorded OTTI losses on available-for-sale debt securities as follows:
     
  Private label MBS 
(In thousands) 2009 
Total other-than-temporary impairment losses  (33,012)
Unrealized other-than-temporary impairment losses recognized in OCI (1)  31,742 
    
Net impairment losses recognized in earnings (2) $(1,270)
    
(1)Represents the noncredit component impact of the OTTI on private label MBS
(2)Represents the credit component of the OTTI on private label MBS
     The following table summarizes the roll-forward of credit losses on debt securities held by the Corporation for which a portion of an OTTI is recognized in OCI:
     
(In thousands) 2009 
Credit losses at the beginning of the period $ 
Additions:    
Credit losses related to debt securities for which an OTTI was not previously recognized  1,270 
    
Ending balance of credit losses on debt securities held for which a portion of an OTTI was recognized in OCI $1,270 
    
     As of December 31, 2009, debt securities with OTTI, for which a loss related to marketcredit was recognized in earnings, consisted entirely of private label MBS. Private label MBS are mortgage pass-through certificates bought from R&G Financial Corporation (“R&G Financial”), a Puerto Rican financial institution. During the second quarter

F-32


FIRST BANCORP
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
of 2009, the Corporation received from R&G Financial a payment of $4.2 million to eliminate the 10% recourse provision contained in the private label MBS.
     Private label MBS are collateralized by fixed-rate mortgages on single-family residential properties in the United States and the interest rate fluctuationsis variable, tied to 3-month LIBOR and limited to some extent credit spread widening.the weighted-average coupon of the underlying collateral. The underlying mortgages are fixed-rate single family loans with original high FICO scores (over 700) and moderate original loan-to-value ratios (under 80%), as well as moderate delinquency levels. Refer to Note 1 for detailed information about the “Investment Securities Available for Sale” discussion above for additional information regarding government-sponsored agencies. At this time,methodology used to determine the fair value of private label MBS.
     Based on the expected cash flows derived from the model, and since the Corporation does not have the intention to sell the securities and has the intentsufficient capital and abilityliquidity to hold these investmentssecurities until maturity,a recovery of the fair value occurs, only the credit loss component was reflected in earnings. Significant assumptions in the valuation of the private label MBS as of December 31, 2009 were as follow:
         
  Weighted  
  Average Range
Discount rate  15%  15%
Prepayment rate  21%  13.06% – 50.25%
Projected Cumulative Loss Rate  4%  0.22% – 10.56%
     For the years ended December 31, 2009 and principal2008, the Corporation recorded OTTI of approximately $0.4 million and interest are deemed recoverable.$1.8 million, respectively, on certain equity securities held in its available-for-sale investment portfolio related to financial institutions in Puerto Rico. Also, OTTI of $4.2 million was recorded in 2008 related to auto industry corporate bonds that were subsequently sold in 2009. Management concluded that the declines in value of the securities were other-than-temporary; as such, the cost basis of these securities was written down to the market value as of the date of the analysis and is reflected in earnings as a realized loss.
     Total proceeds from the sale of securities available for sale during 2009 amounted to approximately $1.9 billion (2008 — $680.0 million). The impairment is considered temporary.following table summarizes the realized gains and losses on sales of securities available for sale for the years indicated:
         
  Year ended December 31, 
(In thousands) 2009  2008 
Realized gains $82,772  $17,896 
Realized losses     (190)
       
Net realized security gains $82,772  $17,706 
       
     The following table states the name of issuers, and the aggregate amortized cost and market value of the securities of such issuers (includes available-for-sale and held-to-maturity securities), when the aggregate amortized cost of such securities exceeds 10% of stockholders’ equity. This information excludes securities of the U.S. and P.R. Government. Investments in obligations issued by a state of the U.S. and its political subdivisions and agencies that

F-28


FIRST BANCORP
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
are payable and secured by the same source of revenue or taxing authority, other than the U.S. Government, are considered securities of a single issuer and include debt and mortgage-backed securities.
                                
 2008 2007 2009 2008
 Amortized Amortized   Amortized Amortized  
 Cost Fair Value Cost Fair Value Cost Fair Value Cost Fair Value
 (In thousands)  (In thousands) 
FHLMC $1,862,939 $1,908,024 $1,203,395 $1,201,817  $1,350,291 $1,369,535 $1,862,939 $1,908,024 
GNMA 332,385 342,674 43,869 44,340  474,349 483,964 332,385 342,674 
FNMA 2,978,102 3,025,549 2,700,600 2,691,192  2,629,187 2,684,065 2,978,102 3,025,549 
FHLB 20,000 20,058 283,035 282,800 
RG Crown Mortgage Loan Trust 143,921 113,685 161,744 133,337 

F-33


FIRST BANCORP
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
Note 5 — Other Equity Securities
     Institutions that are members of the FHLB system are required to maintain a minimum investment in FHLB stock. Such minimum is calculated as a percentage of aggregate outstanding mortgages, and an additional investment is required that is calculated as a percentage of total FHLB advances, letters of credit, and the collateralized portion of interest-rate swaps outstanding. The stock is capital stock issued at $100 par value. Both stock and cash dividends may be received on FHLB stock.
     As of December 31, 20082009 and 2007,2008, the Corporation had investments in FHLB stock with a book value of $62.6$68.4 million ($54 million FHLB-New York and $63.4$14.4 million FHLB-Atlanta) and $62.6 million, respectively. The net realizable value is a reasonable proxy for the fair value of these instruments. Dividend income from FHLB stock for 2009, 2008 2007 and 20062007 amounted to $3.1 million, $3.7 million and $2.9 million, respectively.
     The FHLB stocks owned by the Corporation are issued by the FHLB of New York and $2.0by the FHLB of Atlanta. Both Banks are part of the Federal Home Loan Bank System, a national wholesale banking network of 12 regional, stockholder-owned congressionally chartered banks. The Federal Home Loan Banks are all privately capitalized and operated by their member stockholders. The system is supervised by the Federal Housing Finance Agency, which ensures that the Home Loan Banks operate in a financially safe and sound manner, remain adequately capitalized and able to raise funds in the capital markets, and carry out their housing finance mission.
     There is no secondary market for the FHLB stock and it does not have a readily determinable fair value. The stock is a par stock — sold and redeemed at par. It can only be sold to/from the FHLB’s or a member institution. From an OTTI analysis perspective, the relevant consideration for determination is the ultimate recoverability of par value.
     The economic conditions of late 2008 affected the FHLB’s, resulting in the recording of losses on private-label MBS portfolios. In the midst of the mortgage market crisis the FHLB of Atlanta temporarily suspended dividend payments on their stock in the fourth quarter of 2008 and in the first quarter of 2009. In the second and third quarter of 2009, they were re-instated. The FHLB of NY has not suspended payment of dividends. Third and fourth quarter dividends were reduced, and by the first quarter 2009 they were increased.
     The financial situation has since shown signs of improvement, and so have the financial results of the FHLB’s. The FHLB of Atlanta reported preliminary financial results with an 11.7% year-over-year increase in net income to $283.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2009, while the FHLB of NY announce a 120% year-over-year increase in net income to $570.8 million for the same period. At December 31, 2009, both Banks met their regulatory capital-to-assets ratios and liquidity requirements.
     The FHLB’s primary source of funding is debt obligations, which continue to be rated Aaa and AAA by Moody’s and Standard and Poor’s respectively. The Corporation expects to recover the par value of its investments in FHLB stocks in its entirety, therefore no OTTI is deemed to be required.
     The Corporation has other equity securities that do not have a readily available fair value. The carrying value of such securities as of December 31, 20082009 and 20072008 was $1.6 million. During 2009, the Corporation realized a gain of $3.8 million on the sale of VISA Class A stock. As of December 31, 2009 the Corporation still held 119,234 VISA Class C shares. Also, during the first quarter of 2008, the Corporation realized a one-time gain of $9.3 million on the mandatory redemption of part of its investment in VISA, Inc., which completed its initial public offering (IPO) in March 2008.

F-29F-34


FIRST BANCORP
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
Note 6 — Interest and Dividend on Investments
     A detail of interest on investments and FHLB dividend income follows:
                        
 Year Ended December 31,  Year Ended December 31, 
 2008 2007 2006  2009 2008 2007 
 (In thousands)  (In thousands) 
Interest on money market investments:  
Taxable $1,369 $4,805 $21,816  $568 $1,369 $4,805 
Exempt 4,986 17,226 49,098  9 4,986 17,226 
              
 6,355 22,031 70,914  577 6,355 22,031 
              
 
Mortgage-backed securities:  
Taxable 2,517 2,044 3,121  30,854 2,517 2,044 
Exempt 199,875 110,816 121,687  172,923 199,875 110,816 
       
        203,777 202,392 112,860 
 202,392 112,860 124,808        
        
PR Government obligations, U.S. Treasury securities and U.S. Government agencies:  
Taxable 3,657    2,694 3,657  
Exempt 74,667 148,986 154,079  44,510 74,667 148,986 
              
 78,324 148,986 154,079  47,204 78,324 148,986 
              
 
Equity securities:  
Taxable 38  274  69 38  
Exempt 6 3 76  37 6 3 
       
        106 44 3 
 44 3 350        
        
Other investment securities (including FHLB dividends):  
Taxable 4,281 3,426 2,579  3,375 4,281 3,426 
Exempt   31     
              
 4,281 3,426 2,610  3,375 4,281 3,426 
              
 
Total interest and dividends on investments $291,396 $287,306 $352,761  $255,039 $291,396 $287,306 
              

F-35


FIRST BANCORP
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
     The following table summarizes the components of interest and dividend income on investments:
             
  Year Ended December 31, 
  2008  2007  2006 
      (In thousands)     
Interest income on investment securities and money market investments $291,732  $287,990  $350,750 
Dividends on FHLB stock  3,710   2,861   2,009 
Net interest settlement on interest rate caps and swaps  237      (25)
          
Interest income excluding unrealized (loss) gain on derivatives (economic hedges)  295,679   290,851   352,734 
Unrealized (loss) gain on derivatives (economic hedges) from interest rate caps and interest rate swaps on corporate bonds  (4,283)  (3,545)  27 
          
Total interest income and dividends on investments $291,396  $287,306  $352,761 
          

F-30


FIRST BANCORP
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
             
  Year Ended December 31, 
  2009  2008  2007 
      (In thousands)     
Interest income on investment securities and money market investments $248,563  $291,732  $287,990 
Dividends on FHLB stock  3,082   3,710   2,861 
Net interest settlement on interest rate caps     237    
          
Interest income excluding unrealized gain (loss) on derivatives (economic hedges)  251,645   295,679   290,851 
Unrealized gain (loss) on derivatives (economic hedges) from interest rate caps  3,394   (4,283)  (3,545)
          
Total interest income and dividends on investments $255,039  $291,396  $287,306 
          
Note 7 — Loans Receivable
     The following is a detail of the loan portfolio:
                
 December 31,  December 31, 
 2008 2007  2009 2008 
 (In thousands)  (In thousands) 
Residential real estate loans, mainly secured by first mortgages $3,481,325 $3,143,497 
Residential mortgage loans, mainly secured by first mortgages $3,595,508 $3,481,325 
          
  
Commercial loans:  
Construction loans 1,526,995 1,454,644  1,492,589 1,526,995 
Commercial mortgage loans 1,535,758 1,279,251  1,590,821 1,535,758 
Commercial loans 3,857,728 3,231,126 
Commercial and Industrial loans(1)
 5,029,907 3,857,728 
Loans to local financial institutions collateralized by real estate mortgages 567,720 624,597  321,522 567,720 
          
Commercial loans 7,488,201 6,589,618  8,434,839 7,488,201 
          
  
Finance leases 363,883 378,556  318,504 363,883 
          
  
Consumer loans 1,744,480 1,667,151  1,579,600 1,744,480 
          
  
Loans receivable 13,077,889 11,778,822  13,928,451 13,077,889 
  
Allowance for loan and lease losses  (281,526)  (190,168)  (528,120)  (281,526)
          
  
Loans receivable, net 12,796,363 11,588,654  13,400,331 12,796,363 
  
Loans held for sale 10,403 20,924  20,775 10,403 
          
Total loans $12,806,766 $11,609,578  $13,421,106 $12,806,766 
          
(1)As of December 31, 2009, includes $1.2 billion of commercial loans that are secured by real estate but are not dependent upon the real estate for repayment.
     As of December 31, 20082009 and 2007,2008, the Corporation had a net deferred origination feefees on its loan portfolio amounting to $3.7$5.2 million and $3.9$3.7 million, respectively. Total loan portfolio is net of unearned income of $62.6$49.0 million and $71.3$62.6 million as of December 31, 20082009 and 2007,2008, respectively.
     As of December 31, 2008,2009, loans forin which the accrual of interest income hashad been discontinued amounted to $587.2 million (2007$1.6 billion (2008$413.1$587.2 million). If these loans were accruing interest, the additional interest income realized would have been $57.9 million (2008 — $29.7 million (2007million; 2007 — $22.7 million; 2006 — $14.1 million). Past due and still accruing loans, which are contractually delinquent 90 days or more, amounted to $471.4$165.9 million as of December 31, 2008 (20072009 (2008$75.5$471.4 million), most of them related to matured construction loans according to contractual terms but are current with respect to interest payments. A significant portion of these matured construction loans were already renewed in 2009 and the Corporation expects to complete the renewal process for the remaining portion in the first half of 2009..
     As of December 31, 2008,2009, the Corporation was servicing residential mortgage loans owned by others aggregating $826.9 million (2007$1.1 billion (2008$759.2$826.9 million) and construction and commercial loans owned by others aggregating $123.4 million (2008 — $74.5 million (2007million).

F-36


FIRST BANCORP
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS$15.5 million).(Continued)
     As of December 31, 2008,2009, the Corporation was servicing commercial loan participations owned by others aggregating $235.0 million (2008 — $191.2 million (2007 — $176.3 million).
     Various loans secured by first mortgages were assigned as collateral for CDs, individual retirement accounts and advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank. The mortgages pledged as collateral amounted to $2.5$1.9 billion as of December 31, 2008 (20072009 (2008$2.2$2.5 billion).
     The Corporation’s primary lending area is Puerto Rico. The Corporation’s Puerto Rico banking subsidiary, First Bank, also lends in the U.S. and British Virgin Islands markets and in the United States (principally in the state of Florida). Of the total gross loan portfolio including loans held for sale, aggregating $13.1of $13.9 billion as of December 31, 2008,2009, approximately 81% has a83% have credit risk concentration in Puerto Rico, 11%9% in the United States and 8% in the Virgin Islands.

F-31


FIRST BANCORP
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
     As of December 31, 2009, the Corporation had $1.2 billion outstanding of credit facilities granted to the Puerto Rico Government and/or its political subdivisions. A substantial portion of these credit facilities are obligations that have a specific source of income or revenues identified for their repayment, such as sales and property taxes collected by the central Government and/or municipalities. Another portion of these obligations consists of loans to public corporations that obtain revenues from rates charged for services or products, such as electric power utilities. Public corporations have varying degrees of independence from the central Government and many receive appropriations or other payments from it. The Corporation also has loans to various municipalities in Puerto Rico for which the good faith, credit and unlimited taxing power of the applicable municipality have been pledged to their repayment.
     The Corporation’sAside from loans extended to the Puerto Rico Government and its political subdivisions, the largest concentrationloan to one borrower as of December 31, 20082009 in the amount of $348.8$321.5 million is with one mortgage originator in Puerto Rico, Doral Financial Corporation. Together with the Corporation’s next largestThis commercial loan concentration of $218.9 million with another mortgage originator in Puerto Rico, R&G Financial, the Corporation’s total loans granted to these mortgage originators amounted to $567.7 million as of December 31, 2008. These commercial loans areis secured by individual mortgage loans on residential and commercial real estate. During the second quarter of 2009, the Corporation completed a transaction with R&G Financial that involved the purchase of approximately $205 million of residential mortgage loans that previously served as collateral for a commercial loan extended to R&G. The purchase price of the transaction was retained by the Corporation to fully pay off the loan, thereby significantly reducing the Corporation’s exposure to a single borrower.
Note 8 — Allowance for loan and lease losses
     The changes in the allowance for loan and lease losses were as follows:
                        
 Year Ended December 31,  Year Ended December 31, 
 2008 2007 2006  2009 2008 2007 
 (In thousands)  (In thousands) 
Balance at beginning of year $190,168 $158,296 $147,999  $281,526 $190,168 $158,296 
Provision for loan and lease losses 190,948 120,610 74,991  579,858 190,948 120,610 
Losses charged against the allowance  (117,072)  (94,830)  (77,209)  (344,422)  (117,072)  (94,830)
Recoveries credited to the allowance 8,751 6,092 12,515  11,158 8,751 6,092 
Other adjustments(1)
 8,731     8,731  
              
Balance at end of year $281,526 $190,168 $158,296  $528,120 $281,526 $190,168 
              
 
(1) Carryover of the allowance for loan losses related to a $218 million auto loan portfolio acquired in the third quarter of 2008.

F-37


FIRST BANCORP
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
     The allowance for impaired loans is part of the allowance for loan and lease losses. The allowance for impaired loans covers those loans for which management has determined that it is probable that the debtor will be unable to pay all the amounts due in accordance with the contractual terms of the loan agreement, and does not necessarily represent loans for which the Corporation will incur a substantial loss. As of December 31, 2009, 2008 2007 and 20062007, impaired loans and their related allowance were as follows:
                        
 Year Ended December 31, Year Ended December 31, 
 2008 2007 2006 2009 2008 2007 
 (In thousands) (In thousands) 
Impaired loans $501,229 $151,818 $63,022 
Impaired loans with valuation allowance 384,914 66,941 63,022 
Impaired loans with valuation allowance, net of charge-offs $1,060,088 $384,914 $66,941 
Impaired loans without valuation allowance, net of charge-offs 596,176 116,315 84,877 
       
Total impaired loans $1,656,264 $501,229 $151,818 
       
 
Allowance for impaired loans 83,353 7,523 9,989  182,145 83,353 7,523 
  
During the year:  
  
Average balance of impaired loans 302,439 116,362 54,083  1,022,051 302,439 116,362 
  
Interest income recognized on impaired loans 22,168 6,588 3,239 
Interest income recognized on impaired loans (1) 21,160 12,974 6,588 
(1)For 2009 excludes interest income of approximately $4.7 million, related to $761.5 million non-performing loans, that was applied against the related principal balance under the cost-recovery method.
     The following tables show the activity for impaired loans and related specific reserve during 2009:
     
Impaired Loans: (In thousands) 
Balance at beginning of year $501,229 
Loans determined impaired during the year  1,466,805 
Net charge-offs (1)  (244,154)
Loans sold, net of charge-offs of $49.6 million (2)  (39,374)
Loans foreclosed, paid in full and partial payments  (28,242)
    
Balance at end of year $1,656,264 
    
(1)Approximately $114.2 million, or 47%, is related to construction loans in Florida and $44.6 million, or 18%, is related to construction loans in Puerto Rico.
(2)Related to five construction projects sold in Florida.
     
Specific Reserve: (In thousands) 
Balance at beginning of year $83,353 
Provision for loan losses  342,946 
Net charge-offs  (244,154)
    
Balance at end of year $182,145 
    
     During 2008,The Corporation provides homeownership preservation assistance to its customers through a loss mitigation program in Puerto Rico and through programs sponsored by the Corporation identified severalFederal Government. Due to the nature of the borrower’s financial condition, the restructure or loan modification through these program as well as other restructurings of individual commercial, andcommercial mortgage loans, construction loans amountingand residential mortgages in the U.S. mainland fit the definition of Troubled Debt Restructuring (“TDR”). A restructuring of a debt constitutes a TDR if the creditor for economic or legal reasons related to $414.9 millionthe debtor’s financial difficulties grants a concession to the debtor that it determined should be classified as impaired,would not otherwise consider. Modifications involve changes in one or more of which $382.0 million hadthe loan terms that bring a specific reservedefaulted loan current and provide sustainable affordability. Changes may include the refinancing of $82.9 million. Approximately $154.4any past-due amounts, including interest and escrow, the extension of the maturity of the loans and modifications of the loan rate. As of December 31, 2009, the Corporation’s TDR loans consisted of $124.1 million of the $351.5residential mortgage loans, $42.1 million commercial and industrial loans, $68.1 million commercial mortgage loans and $101.7 million of construction loans. Outstanding unfunded loan commitments on TDR loans that were determinedamounted to be impaired during 2008 are related to the Miami Corporate Banking operations condo-conversion loans, which has a related specific reserve$1.3 million as of $36.0 million.
     Meanwhile, the Corporation’s impaired loans decreased by approximately $64.1 million during 2008, principally as a result of: (i) the foreclosure of two condo-conversion loans related to a troubled relationship in the Corporation’s Miami Corporate Banking Operations, with an aggregate principal balance of approximately $22.4 million and a related impairment reserve of $4.2 million, and (ii) the sale for $22.5 million, in the first half of 2008, of a condo-conversion loan that carried a principal balance of approximately $24.1 million and a related impairment reserve of $2.4 million related to the same troubled relationship in Miami. One of the foreclosed condo-conversion projects, with a carrying value of $3.8 million, was sold in the latter part of 2008 and a loss of $0.4 million was recorded. The Corporation expects to complete the sale of the last remaining foreclosed condo-conversion project inDecember 31, 2009.

F-32F-38


FIRST BANCORP
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
the U.S. mainland     Included in the first half$101.7 million of 2009 and a write-down of $5.3 million to the value of this property was recorded forconstruction TDR loans are certain impaired condo-conversion loans restructured into two separate agreements (loan splitting) in the fourth quarter of 2008. Other decreases2009. Each of these loans were restructured into two notes; one that represents the portion of the loan that is expected to be fully collected along with contractual interest and the second note that represents the portion of the original loan that was charged-off. The renegotiations of these loans have been made after analyzing the borrowers and guarantors capacity to serve the debt and ability to perform under the modified terms. As part of the renegotiation of the loans, the first note of each loan have been placed on a monthly payment that amortize the debt over 25 years at a market rate of interest. An interest rate reduction was granted for the second note. The following tables provide additional information about the volume of this type of loan restructurings and the effect on the allowance for loan and lease losses in impaired2009.
   �� 
  (In thousands) 
Principal balance deemed collectible $22,374 
    
Amount charged-off $(29,713)
    
     
Specific Reserve: (In thousands) 
Balance at beginning of year $14,375 
Provision for loan losses  17,213 
Charge-offs  (29,713)
    
Balance at end of year $1,875 
    
     The loans may includecomprising the $22.4 million that have been deemed collectible continue to be individually evaluated for impairment purposes. These transactions contributed to a $29.9 million decrease in non-performing loans paid in full, loans no longer considered impaired and loans charged-off.during the last quarter of 2009.
Note 9 — Related Party Transactions
     The Corporation granted loans to its directors, executive officers and certain related individuals or entities in the ordinary course of business. The movement and balance of these loans were as follows:
        
 Amount  Amount 
 (In thousands)  (In thousands) 
Balance at December 31, 2006
 $118,853 
Balance at December 31, 2007
 $182,573 
New loans 44,963 
Payments  (48,380)
Other changes  
   
 
Balance at December 31, 2008
 179,156 
   
  
New loans 82,611  3,549 
Payments  (20,934)  (6,405)
Other changes 2,043   (152,130)
      
Balance at December 31, 2007
 182,573 
    
New loans 44,963 
Payments  (48,380)
Other changes  
Balance at December 31, 2009
 $24,170 
      
Balance at December 31, 2008
 $179,156 
   
     These loans do not involve more than normal risk of collectibility and management considers that they present terms that are no more favorable than those that would have been obtained if transactions had been with unrelated parties. The amounts reported as other changes include changes in the status of those who are considered related parties, mainly due to new directors and executive officers.the resignation of an independent director in 2009.
     From time to time, the Corporation, in the ordinary course of its business, obtains services from related parties or makes contributions to non-profit organizations that have some association with the Corporation. Management believes the terms of such arrangements are consistent with arrangements entered into with independent third parties.
Note 10 — Premises and Equipment
     Premises and equipment is comprised of:
             
  Useful Life  Year Ended December 31, 
  In Years  2008  2007 
      (Dollars in thousands) 
Buildings and improvements  10-40  $84,282  $80,044 
Leasehold improvements  1-15   52,945   41,328 
Furniture and equipment  3-10   119,419   107,373 
           
       256,646   228,745 
             
Accumulated depreciation      (133,109)  (116,213)
           
       123,537   112,532 
             
Land      24,791   21,867 
Projects in progress      30,140   28,236 
           
Total premises and equipment, net     $178,468  $162,635 
           
     Depreciation and amortization expense amounted to $19.2 million, $17.7 million and $16.8 million for the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006, respectively.

F-33F-39


FIRST BANCORP
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
Note 10 — Premises and Equipment
     Premises and equipment is comprised of:
             
      As of December 31, 
  Useful Life  2009  2008 
  In Years  (Dollars in thousands) 
Buildings and improvements  10 - 40  $90,158  $84,282 
Leasehold improvements  1 - 15   57,522   52,945 
Furniture and equipment  3 - 10   123,582   119,419 
           
       271,262   256,646 
             
Accumulated depreciation      (155,459)  (133,109)
           
       115,803   123,537 
             
Land      28,327   24,791 
Projects in progress      53,835   30,140 
           
Total premises and equipment, net     $197,965  $178,468 
           
     Depreciation and amortization expense amounted to $20.8 million, $19.2 million and $17.7 million for the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively.
Note 11 — Goodwill and Other Intangibles
     Goodwill as of December 31, 20082009 and 20072008 amounted to $28.1 million, recognized as part of “Other Assets”. NoThe Corporation’s conducted its annual evaluation of goodwill and intangible during the fourth quarter of 2009. The Step 1 evaluation of goodwill of the Florida reporting unit indicated potential impairment of goodwill; however, impairment was recognizednot indicated based upon the results of the Step 2 analysis. Goodwill was not impaired as of December 31, 2009 or 2008, nor was any goodwill written-off due to impairment during 2009, 2008 2007 or 2006.and 2007. Refer to Note 1 for additional details about the methodology used for the goodwill impairment analysis.
     As of December 31, 2008,2009, the gross carrying amount and accumulated amortization of core deposit intangibles was $45.8$41.8 million and $21.8$25.2 million, respectively, recognized as part of “Other Assets” in the Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition (December 31, 20072008$41.2$45.8 million and $18.3$21.8 million, respectively). The increase in the gross amount from December 2007 relates to the acquisition of the Virgin Islands Community Bank (“VICB”) on January 28, 2008. For the year ended December 31, 2008,2009, the amortization expense of core deposit intangibles amounted to $3.4 million (2008 — $3.6 million (2007million; 2007 — $3.3 million; 2006 — $3.4 million). As a result of an impairment evaluation of core deposit intangibles, there was an impairment charge of $4.0 million recognized during 2009 related to core deposits in FirstBank Florida attributable to decreases in the base of core deposits acquired and recorded as part of other non-interest expenses in the Statement of (Loss) Income.
     The following table presents the estimated aggregate annual amortization expense of the core deposit intangibles:intangible:
        
 Amount Amount
 (In thousands) (In thousands)
2009 $3,493 
2010 2,757  $2,557 
2011 2,757  2,522 
2012 2,688  2,522 
2013 and thereafter 12,291 
2013 2,522 
2014 and thereafter 6,477 

F-40


FIRST BANCORP
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
Note 12 — Servicing Assets
     As disclosed in Note 1, the Corporation is actively involved in the securitization of pools of FHA-insured and VA-guaranteed mortgages for issuance of GNMA mortgage-backed securities. Also, certain conventional conforming-loans are sold to FNMA or FHLMC with servicing retained. The Corporation recognizes as separate assets the rights to service loans for others, whether those servicing assets are originated or purchased.
     The changes in servicing assets are shown below:
             
  Year Ended December 31, 
  2009  2008  2007 
  (In thousands) 
Balance at beginning of year $8,151  $7,504  $5,317 
Capitalization of servicing assets  6,072   1,559   1,285 
Servicing assets purchased     621   1,962 
Amortization  (2,321)  (1,533)  (1,060)
          
Balance before valuation allowance at end of year  11,902   8,151   7,504 
Valuation allowance for temporary impairment  (745)  (751)  (336)
          
Balance at end of year $11,157  $7,400  $7,168 
          
     Impairment charges are recognized through a valuation allowance for each individual stratum of servicing assets. The valuation allowance is adjusted to reflect the amount, if any, by which the cost basis of the servicing asset for a given stratum of loans being serviced exceeds its fair value. Any fair value in excess of the cost basis of the servicing asset for a given stratum is not recognized. Other-than-temporary impairments, if any, are recognized as a direct write-down of the servicing assets.
     Changes in the impairment allowance were as follows:
             
  Year Ended December 31, 
  2009  2008  2007 
  (In thousands) 
Balance at beginning of year $751  $336  $57 
Temporary impairment charges  2,537   1,437   461 
Recoveries  (2,543)  (1,022)  (182)
          
Balance at end of year  745   751  $336 
          
     The components of net servicing income are shown below:
             
  Year Ended December 31, 
  2009  2008  2007 
  (In thousands) 
Servicing fees $3,082  $2,565  $2,133 
Late charges and prepayment penalties  581   513   503 
          
Servicing income, gross  3,663   3,078   2,636 
Amortization and impairment of servicing assets  (2,315)  (1,948)  (1,339)
          
Servicing income, net $1,348  $1,130  $1,297 
          

F-41


FIRST BANCORP
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
     The Corporation’s servicing assets are subject to prepayment and interest rate risks. Key economic assumptions used in determining the fair value at the time of sale ranged as follows
         
  Maximum Minimum
2009:
        
Constant prepayment rate:
        
Government guaranteed mortgage loans  24.8%  14.3%
Conventional conforming mortgage loans  21.9%  16.4%
Conventional non-conforming mortgage loans  20.1%  12.8%
Discount rate:
        
Government guaranteed mortgage loans  13.6%  11.8%
Conventional conforming mortgage loans  9.3%  9.2%
Conventional non-conforming mortgage loans  13.2%  13.1%
         
2008:
        
Constant prepayment rate:
        
Government guaranteed mortgage loans  22.1%  13.6%
Conventional conforming mortgage loans  17.7%  10.2%
Conventional non-conforming mortgage loans  14.5%  9.0%
Discount rate:
        
Government guaranteed mortgage loans  10.5%  10.1%
Conventional conforming mortgage loans  9.3%  9.3%
Conventional non-conforming mortgage loans  13.4%  13.2%
         
2007:
        
Constant prepayment rate:
        
Government guaranteed mortgage loans  17.2%  11.0%
Conventional conforming mortgage loans  13.2%  8.8%
Conventional non-conforming mortgage loans  13.2%  10.6%
Discount rate:
        
Government guaranteed mortgage loans  10.0%  10.0%
Conventional conforming mortgage loans  9.0%  9.0%
Conventional non-conforming mortgage loans  13.7%  13.0%
     At December 31, 2009, fair values of the Corporation’s servicing assets were based on a valuation model that incorporates market driven assumptions, adjusted by the particular characteristics of the Corporation’s servicing portfolio, regarding discount rates and mortgage prepayment rates. The weighted-averages of the key economic assumptions used by the Corporation in its valuation model and the sensitivity of the current fair value to immediate 10 percent and 20 percent adverse changes in those assumptions for mortgage loans at December 31, 2009, were as follows:
     
(Dollars in thousands)    
Carrying amount of servicing assets $11,157 
Fair value $12,920 
Weighted-average expected life (in years)  6.6 
     
Constant prepayment rate (weighted-average annual rate)
  15.4%
Decrease in fair value due to 10% adverse change $745 
Decrease in fair value due to 20% adverse change $1,388 
     
Discount rate (weighted-average annual rate)
  11.10%
Decrease in fair value due to 10% adverse change $149 
Decrease in fair value due to 20% adverse change $632 
     These sensitivities are hypothetical and should be used with caution. As the figures indicate, changes in fair value based on a 10 percent variation in assumptions generally cannot be extrapolated because the relationship of the change in assumption to the change in fair value may not be linear. Also, in this table, the effect of a variation in a particular assumption on the fair value of the servicing asset is calculated without changing any other assumption; in reality, changes in one factor may result in changes in another (for example, increases in market interest rates may result in lower prepayments), which may magnify or counteract the sensitivities.

F-42


FIRST BANCORP
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
Note 13 — Deposits and Related Interest
     Deposits and related interest consist of the following:
         
  December 31, 
  2008  2007 
  (In thousands) 
Type of account and interest rate:        
Non-interest bearing checking accounts $625,928  $621,884 
Savings accounts – 0.80% to 3.75% (2007 - 0.60% to 5.00%)  1,288,179   1,036,662 
Interest bearing checking accounts – 0.75% to 3.75% (2007 - 0.40% to 5.00%)  726,731   518,570 
Certificates of deposit – 0.75% to 7.00% (2007 - 0.75% to 7.00%)  1,986,770   1,680,344 
Brokered certificates of deposit(1) - 2.15% to 6.00% (2007 - 3.20% to 6.50%)
  8,429,822   7,177,061 
       
  $13,057,430  $11,034,521 
       
         
  December 31, 
  2009  2008 
  (In thousands) 
Type of account and interest rate:        
Non-interest bearing checking accounts $697,022  $625,928 
Savings accounts - 0.50% to 2.52% (2008 - 0.80% to 3.75%)  1,774,273   1,288,179 
Interest bearing checking accounts - 0.50% to 2.79% (2008 - 0.75% to 3.75% )  985,470   726,731 
Certificates of deposit - 0.15% to 7.00% (2008 - 0.75% to 7.00%)  1,650,866   1,986,770 
Brokered certificates of deposit(1) - 0.25% to 5.30% (2008 - 2.15% to 6.00%)
  7,561,416   8,429,822 
       
  $12,669,047  $13,057,430 
       
 
(1) Includes $1,150,959$0 and $4,186,563$1,150,959 measured at fair value as of December 31, 20082009 and 2007,2008, respectively.
     The weighted average interest rate on total deposits as of December 31, 2009 and 2008 was 2.06% and 2007 was 3.63 % and 4.73%3.63%, respectively.
     As of December 31, 2008,2009, the aggregate amount of overdrafts in demand deposits that were reclassified as loans amounted to $16.5 million (2008 — $12.8 million (2007 — $13.6 million).

F-34


FIRST BANCORP
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
     The following table presents a summary of CDs, including brokered CDs, with a remaining term of more than one year as of December 31, 2008:2009:
Total
(In thousands)
Over one year to two years$ 2,393,370
Over two years to three years544,021
Over three years to four years373,355
Over four years to five years251,482
Over five years1,088,572
Total$ 4,650,800
     
  Total 
  (In thousands) 
Over one year to two years $1,786,651 
Over two years to three years  1,048,911 
Over three years to four years  279,467 
Over four years to five years  42,382 
Over five years  13,806 
    
Total $3,171,217 
    
     As of December 31, 2008,2009, CDs in denominations of $100,000 or higher amounted to $9.6$8.6 billion (2007(2008$8.1$9.6 billion) including brokered CDs of $8.4$7.6 billion (2007(2008$7.2$8.4 billion) at a weighted average rate of 4.03% (20072.13% (20085.20%4.03%) issued to deposit brokers in the form of large ($100,000 or more) certificates of deposit that are generally participated out by brokers in shares of less than $100,000. As of December 31, 2008,2009, unamortized broker placement fees amounted to $21.6$23.2 million (2007(2008$4.4$21.6 million), which are amortized over the contractual maturity of the brokered CDs under the interest method. The volumeDuring 2009, all of the $1.1 billion of brokered CDs measured at fair value under SFAS 159 has decreased by approximately $3.0 billion to $1.1 billion as ofthat were outstanding at December 31, 2008 from $4.1 billion as of December 31, 2007 as thewere called. The Corporation exercised its call option on swapped-to-floating brokered CDs after the cancellation of interest rate swaps by counterparties due to lower prevailing short-term interest rates. Mostlevels of 3-month LIBOR. Some of these brokered CDs were replaced by new brokered CDs not hedged with interest rate swaps and not measured at fair value, under SFAS 159, causing the increase in the unamortized balance of broker placement fees.
     As of December 31, 2008,2009, deposit accounts issued to government agencies with a carrying value of $564.3$447.5 million (2007(2008$347.8$564.3 million) were collateralized by securities and loans with an amortized cost of $600.5$539.1 million (2007(2008$356.4$600.5 million) and estimated market value of $604.6$541.9 million (2007(2008$356.8$604.6 million), and by municipal obligations with a carrying value and estimated market value of $32.4$66.3 million (20072008$30.5$32.4 million).
     A table showing interest expense on deposits follows:
             
  Year Ended December 31, 
  2008  2007  2006 
  (In thousands) 
Interest-bearing checking accounts $12,914  $11,365  $5,919 
Savings  18,916   15,037   12,970 
Certificates of deposit  73,744   82,767   80,284 
Brokered certificates of deposit  309,264   419,571   505,860 
          
Total $414,838  $528,740  $605,033 
          
     The interest expense on deposits includes the valuation to market of interest rate swaps that hedge brokered CDs (economically or under fair value hedge accounting), the related interest exchanged, the amortization of broker placement fees, the amortization of basis adjustment and changes in fair value of callable brokered CDs elected for the fair value option under SFAS 159 (“SFAS 159 brokered CDs”).

F-35F-43


FIRST BANCORP
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
     A table showing interest expense on deposits follows:
             
  Year Ended December 31, 
  2009  2008  2007 
  (In thousands) 
Interest-bearing checking accounts $19,995  $12,914  $11,365 
Savings  19,032   18,916   15,037 
Certificates of deposit  50,939   73,466   82,761 
Brokered certificates of deposit  224,521   309,542   419,577 
          
Total $314,487  $414,838  $528,740 
          
     The interest expense on deposits includes the market valuation of interest rate swaps that economically hedge brokered CDs, the related interest exchanged, the amortization of broker placement fees related to brokered CDs not measured at fair value and changes in the fair value of callable brokered CDs measured at fair value.
The following are the components of interest expense on deposits:
            
             Year Ended December 31, 
 2008 2007 2006  2009 2008 2007 
 (In thousands)  (In thousands) 
Interest expense on deposits $407,830 $515,394 $530,181  $295,004 $407,830 $515,394 
Amortization of broker placement fees(1)
 15,665 9,056 19,896  22,858 15,665 9,056 
              
Interest expense on deposits excluding net unrealized (gain) loss on derivatives and SFAS 159 brokered CDs 423,495 524,450 550,077 
Net unrealized (gain) loss on derivatives and SFAS 159 brokered CDs  (8,657) 4,290 58,532 
Accretion of basis adjustment on fair value hedges    (3,576)
Interest expense on deposits excluding net unrealized (gain) loss on derivatives and brokered CDs measured at fair value 317,862 423,495 524,450 
Net unrealized (gain) loss on derivatives and brokered CDs measured at fair value  (3,375)  (8,657) 4,290 
              
Total interest expense on deposits $414,838 $528,740 $605,033  $314,487 $414,838 $528,740 
              
 
(1) For 2008 and 2007, relatesRelated to brokered CDs not elected for themeasured at fair value option under SFAS 159.value.
     Total interest expense on deposits includes net cash settlements on interest rate swaps that economically hedge (economically or under fair value hedge accounting) brokered CDs that for the year ended December 31, 20082009 amounted to net interest realized of $5.5 million (2008 — net interest realized of $35.6 million (2007million; 2007 — net interest incurred of $12.3 million; 2006 — net interest incurred of $8.9 million).
Note 13 — Federal Funds Purchased14 —Loans Payable
     As of December 31, 2009, loans payable consisted of $900 million in short-term borrowings under the FED Discount Window Program bearing interest at 1.00%. The Corporation participates in the Borrower-in-Custody (“BIC”) Program of the FED. Through the BIC Program, a broad range of loans (including commercial, consumer and Securitiesmortgages) may be pledged as collateral for borrowings through the FED Discount Window. As of December 31, 2009 collateral pledged related to this credit facility amounted to $1.2 billion, mainly commercial, consumer and mortgage loan .
Note 15 —Securities Sold Under Agreements to Repurchase
     Federal funds purchased and securitiesSecurities sold under agreements to repurchase (repurchase agreements) consist of the following:
         
  December, 31 
  2008  2007 
  (Dollars in thousands) 
Federal funds purchased, interest ranging from 4.50% to 5.12% $  $161,256 
Repurchase agreements, interest ranging from 2.29% to 5.39% (2007 - 3.26% to 5.67%) (1)  3,421,042   2,933,390 
       
Total $3,421,042  $3,094,646 
       
         
  December, 31 
  2009  2008 
  (Dollars in thousands) 
Repurchase agreements, interest ranging from 0.23% to 5.39% (2008 - 2.29% to 5.39%) (1) $3,076,631  $3,421,042 
       
 
(1) As of December 31, 2008,2009, includes $1.4 billion with an average rate of 4.36%4.29%, which lenders have the right to call before their contractual maturities at various dates beginning on January 30, 2009February 1, 2010
     The weighted-average interest rates on federal funds purchased and repurchase agreements as of December 31, 2009 and 2008 were 3.34% and 2007 were 3.85% and 4.47%, respectively.
     Federal funds purchased and Accrued interest payable on repurchase agreements matureamounted to $18.1 million and $21.2 million as follows:
     
  December 31, 2008 
  (In thousands) 
One to thirty days $333,542 
Over thirty to ninety days   
Over ninety days to one year  200,000 
One to three years  1,287,500 
Three to five years  900,000 
Over five years  700,000 
    
Total $3,421,042 
    
of December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively.

F-36F-44


FIRST BANCORP
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
     Repurchase agreements mature as follows:
     
  December 31, 2009 
  (In thousands) 
One to thirty days $196,628 
Over thirty to ninety days  380,003 
Over ninety days to one year  100,000 
One to three years  1,600,000 
Three to five years  800,000 
    
Total $3,076,631 
    
The following securities were sold under agreements to repurchase:
                                
 December 31, 2008  December 31, 2009 
 Amortized Approximate Weighted  Amortized Approximate Weighted 
 Cost of Fair Value Average  Cost of Fair Value Average 
 Underlying Balance of of Underlying Interest  Underlying Balance of of Underlying Interest 
Underlying Securities Securities Borrowing Securities Rate of Security  Securities Borrowing Securities Rate of Security 
 (Dollars in thousands)  (Dollars in thousands) 
U.S. Treasury securities and obligations of other U.S. Government Sponsored Agencies $511,621 $459,289 $514,796  5.77%
U.S. Treasury securities and obligations of other 
U.S. Government Sponsored Agencies $871,725 $794,267 $875,835  2.15%
Mortgage-backed securities 3,299,221 2,961,753 3,376,421  5.34% 2,504,941 2,282,364 2,560,374  4.37%
              
Total $3,810,842 $3,421,042 $3,891,217  $3,376,666 $3,076,631 $3,436,209 
              
 
Accrued interest receivable $20,856  $13,720 
      
                                
 December 31, 2008  December 31, 2008 
 Amortized Approximate Weighted  Amortized Approximate Weighted 
 Cost of Fair Value Average  Cost of Fair Value Average 
 Underlying Balance of of Underlying Interest  Underlying Balance of of Underlying Interest 
Underlying Securities Securities Borrowing Securities Rate of Security  Securities Borrowing Securities Rate of Security 
 (Dollars in thousands)  (Dollars in thousands) 
U.S. Treasury securities and obligations of other U.S. Government Sponsored Agencies $1,984,596 $1,759,948 $1,984,356  5.83%
U.S. Treasury securities and obligations of other 
U.S. Government Sponsored Agencies $511,621 $459,289 $514,796  5.77%
Mortgage-backed securities 1,323,226 1,173,442 1,317,523  5.06% 3,299,221 2,961,753 3,376,421  5.34%
              
Total $3,307,822 $2,933,390 $3,301,879  $3,810,842 $3,421,042 $3,891,217 
              
 
Accrued interest receivable $28,253  $20,856 
      
     The maximum aggregate balance outstanding at any month-end during 20082009 was $4.1 billion (2007(2008$3.7$4.1 billion). The average balance during 20082009 was $3.6 billion (2007(2008$3.1$3.6 billion). The weighted average interest rate during 2009 and 2008 was 3.22% and 2007 was 3.71% and 4.74%, respectively.
     As of December 31, 20082009 and 2007,2008, the securities underlying such agreements were delivered to the dealers with which the repurchase agreements were transacted.
     Repurchase agreements as of December 31, 2008,2009, grouped by counterparty, were as follows:
                
(Dollars in thousands)    Weighted-Average 
 Weighted-Average 
Counterparty Amount Maturity (In Months)  Amount Maturity (In Months) 
Morgan Stanley $478,600 27 
Credit Suisse First Boston 1,167,442 31  $1,051,731 24 
Citigroup Global Markets 600,000 38 
Barclays Capital 500,000 24 
JP Morgan Chase 575,000 33  475,000 27 
Barclays Capital 500,000 36 
Dean Witter / Morgan Stanley 349,900 27 
UBS Financial Services, Inc. 100,000 43  100,000 31 
Citigroup Global Markets 600,000 50 
        
 $3,421,042  $3,076,631 
        

F-37F-45


FIRST BANCORP
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
Note 1416 — Advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank (FHLB)
     Following is a detailsummary of the advances from the FHLB:
         
  December, 31  December, 31 
  2008  2007 
  (Dollars in thousands) 
Advances from FHLB with maturities ranging from November 17, 2008 to December 15, 2008,
tied to 3-month LIBOR, with an average interest rate of 4.99%
 $  $400,000 
Fixed-rate advances from FHLB with maturities ranging from January 5, 2009 to October 6, 2013
(2007 - January 2, 2008 to May 21, 2013), with an average interest rate of 3.09% (2007 - 4.58%)
  1,060,440   703,000 
       
Total $1,060,440  $1,103,000 
       
         
  December, 31  December, 31 
  2009  2008 
  (Dollars in thousands) 
Fixed-rate advances from FHLB with a weighted-average interest rate of 3.21% (2008 - 3.09%) $978,440  $1,060,440 
       
     Advances from FHLB mature as follows:
        
 December, 31  December, 31 
 2008  2009 
 (In thousands)  (In thousands) 
One to thirty days $270,000  $5,000 
Over thirty to ninety days 50,000  13,000 
Over ninety days to one year 62,000  307,000 
One to three years 411,000  445,000 
Three to five years 267,440  208,440 
      
Total $1,060,440  $978,440 
      
     Advances are received from the FHLB under an Advances, Collateral Pledge and Security Agreement (the “Collateral Agreement”). Under the Collateral Agreement, the Corporation is required to maintain a minimum amount of qualifying mortgage collateral with a market value of generally 125% or higher than the outstanding advances. As of December 31, 2008,2009, the estimated value of specific mortgage loans pledged as collateral amounted to $1.7$1.1 billion (2007(2008$1.5$1.7 billion), as computed by the FHLB for collateral purposes. The carrying value of such loans as of December 31, 20082009 amounted to $2.4$1.8 billion (2007(2008$2.2$2.4 billion). In addition, securities with an approximate estimated value of $5.6$4.1 million (2007(2008$0.8$5.6 million) and a carrying value of $5.7$4.1 million (2007 - - $0.8(2008 — $5.7 million) were pledged to the FHLB. As of December 31, 2008,2009, the Corporation had additional capacity of approximately $729$378 million on this credit facility based on collateral pledged at the FHLB, including a haircut reflecting the perceived risk associated with holding the collateral. Haircut refers to the percentage by which an asset’s market value is reduced for purposespurpose of collateral levels. Advances may be repaid prior to maturity, in whole or in part, at the option of the borrower upon payment of any applicable fee specified in the contract governing such advance. In calculating the fee due consideration is given to (i) all relevant factors, including but not limited to, any and all applicable costs of repurchasing and/or prepaying any associated liabilities and/or hedges entered into with respect to the applicable advance; and (ii) the financial characteristics, in their entirety, of the advance being prepaid; and (iii), in the case of adjustable-rate advances, the expected future earnings of the replacement borrowing as long as the replacement borrowing is at least equal to the original advance’s par amount and the replacement borrowing’s tenor is at least equal to the remaining maturity of the prepaid advance.

F-38F-46


FIRST BANCORP
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
Note 1517 Notes Payable
     Notes payable consist of:
                
 December 31,  December 31, 
 2008 2007  2009 2008 
 (Dollars in thousands)  (Dollars in thousands) 
Callable step-rate notes, bearing step increasing interest from 5.00% to 7.00% (5.50% as of December 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007) maturing on October 18, 2019, measured at fair value under SFAS 159 $10,141 $14,306 
Callable step-rate notes, bearing step increasing interest from 5.00% to 7.00% (5.50% as of December 31, 2009 and 2008) maturing on October 18, 2019, measured at fair value $13,361 $10,141 
  
Dow Jones Industrial Average (DJIA) linked principal protected notes:  
  
Series A maturing on February 28, 2012 6,245 7,845  6,542 6,245 
  
Series B maturing on May 27, 2011 6,888 8,392  7,214 6,888 
          
 $23,274 $30,543  $27,117 $23,274 
          
Note 1618 — Other Borrowings
     Other borrowings consist of:
         
  December 31, 
  2008  2007 
  (Dollars in thousands) 
Junior subordinated debentures due in 2034, interest-bearing at a floating-rate of 2.75% over 3-month LIBOR (4.62% as of December 31, 2008 and 7.74% as of December 31, 2007) $103,048  $102,951 
         
Junior subordinated debentures due in 2034, interest-bearing at a floating-rate of 2.50% over 3-month LIBOR (4.00% as of December 30, 2008 and 7.43% as of December 31, 2007)  128,866   128,866 
       
  $231,914  $231,817 
       
         
  December 31, 
  2009  2008 
  (Dollars in thousands) 
Junior subordinated debentures due in 2034, interest-bearing at a floating-rate of 2.75% over 3-month LIBOR (3.00% as of December 31, 2009 and 4.62% as of December 31, 2008) $103,093  $103,048 
         
Junior subordinated debentures due in 2034, interest-bearing at a floating-rate of 2.50% over 3-month LIBOR (2.75% as of December 31, 2009 and 4.00% as of December 31, 2008)  128,866   128,866 
       
  $231,959  $231,914 
       
Note 1719 — Unused Lines of Credit
     The Corporation maintains unsecured uncommitted lines of credit with other banks. As of December 31, 2008,2009, the Corporation’s total unused lines of credit with these banks amounted to $220$165 million (2007-$129(2008 — $220 million). As of December 31, 2008,2009, the Corporation has an available line of credit with the FHLB-New York guaranteed with excess collateral already pledged, in the amount of $378.6 million (2008 — $626.9 million (2007-$424.2 million) and an available line of credit with the FHLB-Atlanta of approximately $102.1 million. In addition, the Corporation had additional capacity of approximately $479 million through the Federal Reserve (FED) Discount Window Program based on collateral pledged at the FED, including the haircut..

F-39F-47


FIRST BANCORP
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
Note 1820 — Earnings per Common Share
     The calculations of earnings per common share for the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 2007 and 20062007 follow:
                        
 Year Ended December 31,  Year Ended December 31, 
 2008 2007 2006  2009 2008 2007 
 (In thousands, except per share data)  (In thousands, except per share data) 
Net Income:
 
Net income $109,937 $68,136 $84,634 
Net (Loss) Income:
 
Net (loss) income $(275,187) $109,937 $68,136 
Less: Preferred stock dividends(1)  (40,276)  (40,276)  (40,276)  (42,661)  (40,276)  (40,276)
Less: Preferred stock discount accretion  (4,227)   
              
Net income attributable to common stockholders $69,661 $27,860 $44,358 
Net (loss) income attributable to common stockholders $(322,075) $69,661 $27,860 
              
  
Weighted-Average Shares:
  
Basic weighted-average common shares outstanding 92,508 86,549 82,835  92,511 92,508 86,549 
Average potential common shares 136 317 303   136 317 
              
Diluted weighted-average number of common shares outstanding 92,644 86,866 83,138  92,511 92,644 86,866 
              
  
Earnings per common share:
 
(Loss) Earnings per common share:
 
Basic $0.75 $0.32 $0.54  $(3.48) $0.75 $0.32 
              
Diluted $0.75 $0.32 $0.53  $(3.48) $0.75 $0.32 
              
(1)For the year ended December 31, 2009, preferred stock dividends include $12.6 million of Series F Preferred Stock cumulative preferred
dividends not declared as of the end of the year. Refer to Note 23 for additional information related to the Series F Preferred Stock issued to the U.S. Treasury in connection with the Trouble Asset Relief Program (TARP) Capital Purchase Program.
     (Loss) earnings per common share are computed by dividing net (loss) income attributable to common stockholders by the weighted average common shares issued and outstanding. Net (loss) income attributable to common stockholders represents net (loss) income adjusted for preferred stock dividends including dividends declared, accretion of discount on preferred stock issuances and cumulative dividends related to the current dividend period that have not been declared as of the end of the period. Basic weighted-averageweighted average common shares outstanding exclude unvested shares of restricted stock.
     Potential common shares consist of common stock issuable under the assumed exercise of stock options, and unvested shares of restricted stock, and outstanding warrants using the treasury stock method. This method assumes that the potential common shares are issued and the proceeds from the exercise, in addition to the amount of compensation cost attributedattributable to future services, are used to purchase common stock at the exercise date. The difference between the number of potential shares issued and the shares purchased is added as incremental shares to the actual number of shares outstanding to compute diluted earnings per share. Stock options, and unvested shares of restricted stock, and outstanding warrants that result in lower potential shares issued than shares purchased under the treasury stock method are not included in the computation of dilutive earnings per share since their inclusion would have an antidilutive effect inon earnings per share. For the year ended December 31, 2009, there were 2,481,310 outstanding stock options, warrants outstanding to purchase 5,842,259 shares of common stock related to the TARP Capital Purchase Program and 32,216 shares of restricted stock that were excluded from the computation of diluted earnings per common share because the Corporation reported a net loss attributable to common stockholders for the year and their inclusion would have an antidilutive effect. Refer to Note 23 for additional information related to the issuance of the Series F Preferred Stock and Warrants (as hereinafter defined) under the TARP Capital Purchase Program. For the year ended December 31, 2008, there were 2,020,600 (2007-2,046,562; 2006-2,346,494) weighted-average outstanding stock options, which were excluded from the computation of dilutive earnings per share because they were antidilutive.since their inclusion would have an antidilutive effect on earnings per share.
Note 1921 — Regulatory Capital Requirements
     The Corporation is subject to various regulatory capital requirements imposed by the federal banking agencies. Failure to meet minimum capital requirements can result in certain mandatory and possibly additional discretionary actions by regulators that, if undertaken, could have a direct material effect on the Corporation’s financial statements. Under capital adequacy guidelines and the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action, the Corporation must meet specific capital guidelines that involve quantitative measures of the Corporation’s assets, liabilities, and certain off-balance sheet items as calculated under regulatory accounting practices. The Corporation’s

F-48


FIRST BANCORP
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
capital amounts and classification are also subject to qualitative judgment by the regulators about components, risk weightings and other factors.
     Capital standards established by regulations require the Corporation to maintain minimum amounts and ratios of Tier 1 capital to total average assets (leverage ratio) and ratios of Tier 1 and total capital to risk-weighted assets, as defined in the regulations. The total amount of risk-weighted assets is computed by applying risk-weighting factors to the Corporation’s assets and certain off-balance sheet items, which vary from 0% to 100%200% depending on the nature of the asset.
     As of December 31, 20082009 the Corporation was in compliance with the minimum regulatory capital requirements.
     As of December 31, 20082009 and 2007,2008, the Corporation and each of its subsidiary banks were categorized as “well-capitalized” under the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action. There are no conditions or events since December 31, 20082009 that management believes have changed any subsidiary bank’s capital category.
     The Corporation’s and its banking subsidiary’s regulatory capital positions were as follows:
                         
          Regulatory Requirements
          For Capital To be
  Actual Adequacy Purposes Well-Capitalized
  Amount Ratio Amount Ratio Amount Ratio
  (Dollars in thousands)
At December 31, 2009
                        
Total Capital (to Risk-Weighted Assets)                        
First BanCorp $1,922,138   13.44% $1,144,280   8%  N/A   N/A 
FirstBank $1,838,378   12.87% $1,142,795   8% $1,428,494   10%
                         
Tier I Capital (to Risk-Weighted Assets)                        
First BanCorp $1,739,363   12.16% $572,140   4%  N/A   N/A 
First Bank $1,670,878   11.70% $571,398   4% $857,097   6%
                         
Leverage ratio                        
First BanCorp $1,739,363   8.91% $740,844   4%  N/A   N/A 
FirstBank $1,670,878   8.53% $783,087   4% $978,859   5%
                         
At December 31, 2008
                        
Total Capital (to Risk-Weighted Assets)                        
First BanCorp $1,762,474   12.80% $1,100,990   8%  N/A   N/A 
FirstBank $1,602,538   12.23% $1,048,065   8% $1,310,082   10%
                         
Tier I Capital (to Risk-Weighted Assets)                        
First BanCorp $1,589,854   11.55% $550,495   4%  N/A   N/A 
FirstBank $1,438,265   10.98% $524,033   4% $786,049   6%
                         
Leverage ratio                        
First BanCorp $1,589,854   8.30% $765,935   4%  N/A   N/A 
FirstBank $1,438,265   7.90% $728,409   4% $910,511   5%

F-40F-49


FIRST BANCORP
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
     The Corporation’s and its banking subsidiary’s regulatory capital positions were as follows:
                         
          Regulatory Requirements
          For Capital To be
  Actual Adequacy Purposes Well-Capitalized
  Amount Ratio Amount Ratio Amount Ratio
          (Dollars in thousands)        
At December 31, 2008
                        
Total Capital (to Risk-Weighted Assets)                        
First BanCorp $1,762,474   12.80% $1,100,990   8%  N/A   N/A 
FirstBank $1,602,538   12.23% $1,048,065   8% $1,310,082   10%
FirstBank Florida $90,269   13.53% $53,387   8% $66,734   10%
                         
Tier I Capital (to Risk-Weighted Assets)                        
First BanCorp $1,589,854   11.55% $550,495   4%  N/A   N/A 
FirstBank $1,438,265   10.98% $524,033   4% $786,049   6%
FirstBank Florida $82,946   12.43% $26,694   4% $40,040   6%
                         
Leverage ratio(1)
                        
First BanCorp $1,589,854   8.30% $765,935   4%  N/A   N/A 
FirstBank $1,438,265   7.90% $728,409   4% $910,511   5%
FirstBank Florida $82,946   8.78% $37,791   4% $47,238   5%
                         
At December 31, 2007
                        
Total Capital (to Risk-Weighted Assets)                        
First BanCorp $1,735,644   13.86% $1,001,582   8%  N/A   N/A 
FirstBank $1,570,982   13.23% $949,858   8% $1,187,323   10%
FirstBank Florida $69,446   10.92% $50,878   8% $63,598   10%
                         
Tier I Capital (to Risk-Weighted Assets)                        
First BanCorp $1,578,998   12.61% $500,791   4%  N/A   N/A 
FirstBank $1,422,375   11.98% $474,929   4% $712,394   6%
FirstBank Florida $66,240   10.42% $25,439   4% $38,159   6%
                         
Leverage ratio(1)
                        
First BanCorp $1,578,998   9.29% $679,516   4%  N/A   N/A 
FirstBank $1,422,375   8.85% $643,065   4% $803,831   5%
FirstBank Florida $66,240   7.79% $33,999   4% $42,499   5%
(1)Tier I Capital to average assets for First BanCorp and FirstBank and Tier I Capital to adjusted total assets for FirstBank Florida.
Note 2022 — Stock Option Plan
     Between 1997 and January 2007, the Corporation had a stock option plan (“the 1997 stock option plan”) covering certain employees. This plan allowed forthat authorized the granting of up to 8,696,112 options on shares of the Corporation’s common stock to eligible employees. The options granted under the plan could not exceed 20% of the number of common shares outstanding. Each option provides for the purchase of one share of common stock at a price not less than the fair market value of the stock on the date the option was granted. Stock options were fully vested upon issuance.grant. The maximum term to exercise the options is ten years. The stock option plan provides for a proportionate adjustment in the exercise price and the number of shares that can be purchased in the event of a stock dividend, stock split, reclassification of stock, merger or reorganization and certain other issuances and distributions such as stock appreciation rights.
     Under the 1997 stock option plan, the Compensation and Benefits Committee (the “Compensation Committee”) had the authority to grant stock appreciation rights at any time subsequent to the grant of an option. Pursuant to stock appreciation rights, the optionee surrenders the right to exercise an option granted under the plan in consideration for payment by the Corporation of an amount equal to the excess of the fair market value of the shares of common stock subject to such option surrendered over the total option price of such shares. Any option surrendered is cancelled by the Corporation and the shares subject to the option are not eligible for further grants under the option plan. During the second quarter of 2008, the Compensation Committee approved the grant of stock

F-41


FIRST BANCORP
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
appreciation rights to an executive officer. The employee surrendered the right to exercise 120,000 stock options in the form of stock appreciation rights for a payment of $0.2 million. On January 21, 2007, the 1997 stock option plan expired; all outstanding awards grantsgranted under this plan continue to be in full force and effect, subject to their original terms. AllNo awards for shares that remained available for grantscould be granted under the 1997 stock option plan were cancelled.as of its expiration.
     On April 29, 2008, the Corporation’s stockholders approved the First BanCorp 2008 Omnibus Incentive Plan (the “Omnibus Plan”). The Omnibus Plan provides for equity-based compensation incentives (the “awards”) through the grant of stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock, restricted stock units, performance shares, and other stock-based awards. This plan allows the issuance of up to 3,800,000 shares of common stock, subject to adjustments for stock splits, reorganization and other similar events. The Corporation’s Board of Directors, upon receiving the relevant recommendation of the Compensation Committee, has the power and authority to determine those eligible to receive awards and to establish the terms and conditions of any awards subject to various limits and vesting restrictions that apply to individual and aggregate awards. Shares delivered pursuant to an Award may consist, in whole or in part, of authorized and unissued shares of Common Stock or shares of Common Stock acquired by the Corporation. During the fourth quarter of 2008, pursuant to its independent director compensation plan, the Corporation granted 36,243 shares of restricted stock with a fair value of $8.69 under the Omnibus Plan to the Corporation’s independent directors. The restrictions on suchfollowing table shows the activity of restricted stock award lapse ratably on an annual basis over a three-year period commencing on December 1,during 2009.
Number of
Restricted
Shares
Beginning of year36,243
Restricted shares forfeited(4,027)
End of period outstanding32,216
End of period vested restricted shares10,739
For the yearyears ended December 31, 2009 and 2008, the Corporation recognized $92,361 and $8,750, respectively, of stock-based compensation expense related to the aforementioned restricted stock award.awards. The total unrecognized compensation cost related to these non-vested restricted stocksshares was $306,250$213,889 as of December 31, 20082009 and is expected to be recognized over the next 2.9 years.1.9 year.
     The Corporation accountedaccounts for stock options using the “modified prospective” method upon adoption of SFAS 123R, “Share-Based Payment.”method. There were no stock options granted during 2008.2009 and 2008, therefore no compensation associated with stock options was recorded in those years. The compensation expense associated with stock options for the 2007 and 2006 year was approximately $2.8 million and $5.4 million, respectively.million. All employee stock options granted during 2007 and 2006 were fully vested at the time of grant.

F-50


FIRST BANCORP
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
     SFAS 123RStock-based compensation accounting guidance requires the Corporation to develop an estimate of the number of share-based awards which will be forfeited due to employee or director turnover. Quarterly changes in the estimated forfeiture rate may have a significant effect on share-based compensation, as the effect of adjusting the rate for all expense amortization is recognized in the period in which the forfeiture estimate is changed. If the actual forfeiture rate is higher than the estimated forfeiture rate, then an adjustment is made to increase the estimated forfeiture rate, which will result in a decrease to the expense recognized in the financial statements. If the actual forfeiture rate is lower than the estimated forfeiture rate, then an adjustment is made to decrease the estimated forfeiture rate, which will result in an increase to the expense recognized in the financial statements. There were no forfeiture adjustments in 2008 for the unvested shares of restricted stock. When unvested options or shares of restricted stock are forfeited, any compensation expense previously recognized on the forfeited awards is reversed in the period of the forfeiture. During 2009, as shown above, 4,027 unvested shares of restricted stock were forfeited resulting in the reversal of $9,722 of previously recorded stock-based compensation expense.
     The activity of stock options during the year ended December 31, 20082009 is set forth below:
                 
  For the Year Ended December 31, 2008 
          Weighted-    
          Average  Aggregate 
      Weighted-  Remaining  Intrinsic 
  Number of  Average  Contractual  Value (In 
  Options  Exercise Price  Term (Years)  thousands) 
Beginning of year  4,136,910  $12.60         
Options exercised  (6,000)  8.85         
Options cancelled  (220,000)  8.87         
               
End of period outstanding and exercisable  3,910,910  $12.82   6.2  $4,146 
             

F-42


FIRST BANCORP
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
                 
  For the Year Ended December 31, 2009 
          Weighted-    
          Average  Aggregate 
      Weighted-  Remaining  Intrinsic 
  Number of  Average  Contractual  Value (In 
  Options  Exercise Price  Term (Years)  thousands) 
Beginning of year  3,910,910  $12.82         
Options cancelled  (1,429,600)  11.69         
               
End of period outstanding and exercisable  2,481,310  $13.46   5.2  $ 
             
     The fair value of options granted in 2007, and 2006, which was estimated using the Black-Scholes option pricing method, and the assumptions used are as follows:
            
 2007 2006 2007
Weighted-average stock price at grant date and exercise price $9.20 $12.21  $9.20 
Stock option estimated fair value $2.40 - $2.45 $2.89 - $4.60  $2.40 - $2.45 
Weighted-average estimated fair value $2.43 $4.36  $2.43 
Expected stock option term (years) 4.31 - 4.59 4.22 - 4.31  4.31 - 4.59 
Expected volatility  32%  39% - 46%  32%
Weighted-average expected volatility  32%  45%  32%
Expected dividend yield  3.0%  2.2% - 3.2%  3.0%
Weighted-average expected dividend yield  3.0%  2.3%  3.0%
Risk-free interest rate  5.1%  4.7% - 5.6%  5.1%
     The Corporation uses empirical research data to estimate option exercises and employee termination within the valuation model; separate groups of employees that have similar historical exercise behavior are considered separately for valuation purposes. The expected volatility is based on the historical implied volatility of the Corporation’s common stock at each grant date; otherwise, historical volatilities based upon 260 observations (working days) were obtained from Bloomberg L.P. (“Bloomberg”) and used as inputs in the model. The dividend yield is based on the historical 12-month dividend yield observable at each grant date. The risk-free rate for the period is based on historical zero coupon curves obtained from Bloomberg at the time of grant based on the option’s expected term.
     TheCash proceeds from 6,000 options exercised duringin 2008 amounted to approximately $53,000 and did not have any intrinsic value and the cash proceeds from these options were approximately $53,000.value. No stock options were exercised during 2009 or 2007. Cash proceeds from options exercised during 2006 amounted to $19.8 million. The total intrinsic value of options exercised during 2006 was approximately $10.0 million.
Note 2123 — Stockholders’ Equity
Common stock
     The Corporation has 250,000,000 authorized shares of common stock with a par value of $1 per share. As of December 31, 2008,2009, there were 102,444,549 (2007102,440,522 (2008102,402,306)102,444,549) shares issued and 92,546,749 (200792,542,722 (200892,504,506)92,546,749) shares outstanding.
     On August 24, 2007, First BanCorp entered into a Stockholder Agreement relating to its sale in a private placement of 9,250,450 shares or 10% of In February 2009, the Corporation’s Board of Directors declared a first quarter cash

F-51


FIRST BANCORP
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
dividend of $0.07 per common stock (“Common Stock”)share which was paid on March 31, 2009 to The Bankcommon stockholders of Nova Scotia (“Scotiabank”), a large financial institution with operations around the world, at a price of $10.25 per share pursuant to the terms of an Investment Agreement, dated Februaryrecord on March 15, 2007 (the “Investment Agreement”). The net proceeds to First BanCorp after discounts and expenses were $91.9 million. The securities sold to Scotiabank were issued pursuant to the exemption from registration in Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended. Pursuant to the Investment Agreement, Scotiabank had the right to require the Corporation to register the Common Stock for resale by Scotiabank, or successor owners of the Common Stock,2009 and in accordance with such right,May 2009 declared a second quarter dividend of $0.07 per common share which was paid on February 13,June 30, 2009 to common stockholders of record on June 15, 2009. On July 30, 2009, the Corporation registeredannounced the resale of such shares. Scotiabank is entitled to an observer at meetings of the Board of Directors of First BanCorp, including any committee meetings of the Board of Directors of First BanCorp subject to certain limitations. The observer has no voting rights.
     The Corporation issued 6,000 sharessuspension of common stock during 2008 (2006 — 2,379,000) as partand preferred dividends effective with the preferred dividend for the month of the exercise of stock options granted under the Corporation’s stock-based compensation plan. No shares of common stock were issued during 2007 under the Corporation’s stock-based compensation plan.August 2009.
     On December 1, 2008, the Corporation granted 36,243 shares of restricted stock under the Omnibus Plan to the Corporation’s independent directors.directors, of which 4,027 were forfeited in 2009 due to the departure of a director. The restrictions on such restricted stock award lapse ratably on an annual basis over a three-year period. The shares of restricted stock may vest more quickly in the event of death, disability, retirement, or a change in control. Based on particular circumstances evaluated by the Compensation Committee as they may relate to the termination of a restricted stock holder, the Corporation’s Board of Directors may, with the

F-43


FIRST BANCORP
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued
recommendation of the Compensation Committee, grant the full vesting of the restricted stock held upon termination of employment. Holders of restricted stock have the right to dividends or dividend equivalents, as applicable, during the restriction period. Such dividends or dividend equivalents will accrue during the restriction period, but not be paid until restrictions lapse. The holder of restricted stocks has the right to vote the shares.
Stock repurchase plan and treasury stock
     The Corporation has a stock repurchase program under which from time to time it repurchases shares of common stock in the open market and holds them as treasury stock. No shares of common stock were repurchased during 20082009 and 20072008 by the Corporation. As of December 31, 20082009 and 2007,2008, of the total amount of common stock repurchased in prior years, 9,897,800 shares were held as treasury stock and were available for general corporate purposes.
Preferred stock
     The Corporation has 50,000,000 authorized shares of non-cumulative and non-convertible preferred stock with a par value of $1, redeemable at the Corporation’s option subject to certain terms. This stock may be issued in series and the shares of each series shall have such rights and preferences as shall be fixed by the Board of Directors when authorizing the issuance of that particular series. During 2008 and 2007 the Corporation did not issue preferred stock. As of December 31, 2008,2009, the Corporation has five outstanding series of non convertiblenon-convertible non-cumulative preferred stock: 7.125% non-cumulative perpetual monthly income preferred stock, Series A; 8.35% non-cumulative perpetual monthly income preferred stock, Series B; 7.40% non-cumulative perpetual monthly income preferred stock, Series C; 7.25% non-cumulative perpetual monthly income preferred stock, Series D; and 7.00% non-cumulative perpetual monthly income preferred stock, Series E, which trade on the NYSE. The liquidation value per share is $25. Annual dividends of $1.75 per share (Series E), $1.8125 per share (Series D), $1.85 per share (Series C), $2.0875 per share (Series B) and $1.78125 per share (Series A) are payable monthly, if declared by the Board of Directors. Dividends declared on the non-convertible non-cumulative preferred stock for each2009, 2008 and 2007 amounted to $23.5 million, $40.3 million and $40.3 million, respectively.
     In January 2009, in connection with the TARP Capital Purchase Program, established as part of the Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008, 2007the Corporation issued to the U.S. Treasury 400,000 shares of its Fixed Rate Cumulative Perpetual Preferred Stock, Series F, $1,000 liquidation preference value per share. The Series F Preferred Stock has a call feature after three years. In connection with this investment, the Corporation also issued to the U.S. Treasury a 10-year warrant (the “Warrant”) to purchase 5,842,259 shares of the Corporation’s common stock at an exercise price of $10.27 per share. The Corporation registered the Series F Preferred Stock, the Warrant and 2006the shares of common stock underlying the Warrant for sale under the Securities Act of 1933. The Corporation recorded the total $400 million of the preferred shares and the Warrant at their relative fair values of $374.2 million and $25.8 million, respectively. The preferred shares were valued using a discounted cash flow analysis and applying a discount rate of 10.9%. The difference from the par amount of the preferred shares is accreted to preferred stock over five years using the interest method with a corresponding adjustment to preferred dividends. The Cox-Rubinstein binomial model was used to estimate the value of the Warrant with a strike price calculated, pursuant to the Securities Purchase Agreement with the U.S. Treasury, based on the average closing prices of the common stock on the 20 trading days ending the last day prior to the date of approval to participate in the Program. No credit risk was assumed given the Corporation’s availability of authorized, but unissued common shares; as well as its intention of reserving sufficient shares to satisfy the exercise of the warrants. The volatility parameter input was the historical 5-year common stock price volatility.

F-52


FIRST BANCORP
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
     The Series F Preferred Stock qualifies as Tier 1 regulatory capital. Cumulative dividends on the Series F Preferred Stock accrue on the liquidation preference amount on a quarterly basis at a rate of 5% per annum for the first five years, and thereafter at a rate of 9% per annum, but will only be paid when, as and if declared by the Corporation’s Board of Directors out of assets legally available therefore. The Series F Preferred Stock ranks pari passu with the Corporation’s existing Series A through E, in terms of dividend payments and distributions upon liquidation, dissolution and winding up of the Corporation. The Purchase Agreement relating to this issuance contains limitations on the payment of dividends on common stock, including limiting regular quarterly cash dividends to an amount not exceeding the last quarterly cash dividend paid per share, or the amount publicly announced (if lower), of common stock prior to October 14, 2008, which is $0.07 per share. For the year ended December 31, 2009, preferred stock dividends of Series F Preferred Stock amounted to $40.3 million.$19.2 million, including $12.6 million of cumulative preferred dividends not declared as of the end of the period.
     On January 16,The Warrant has a 10-year term and is exercisable at any time. The exercise price and the number of shares issuable upon exercise of the Warrant are subject to certain anti-dilution adjustments.
     The possible future issuance of equity securities through the exercise of the Warrant could affect the Corporation’s current stockholders in a number of ways, including by:
diluting the voting power of the current holders of common stock (the shares underlying the warrant represent approximately 6% of the Corporation’s shares of common stock as of December 31, 2009);
diluting the earnings per share and book value per share of the outstanding shares of common stock; and
making the payment of dividends on common stock more expensive.
     As mentioned above, on July 30, 2009, the Corporation entered into a Letter Agreementannounced the suspension of dividends for common and all its outstanding series of preferred stock. This suspension was effective with the United States Departmentdividends for the month of August 2009, on the Corporation’s five outstanding series of non-cumulative preferred stock and dividends for the Corporation’s outstanding Series F Cumulative Preferred Stock and the Corporation’s common stock. As a result of the Treasury (“Treasury”) pursuant to which Treasury invested $400,000,000 in preferred stockdividend suspension, the terms of the Corporation under the Treasury’s Troubled Asset Relief Program Capital Purchase Program. For further detailsSeries F Cumulative Preferred Stock include limitations on the transaction, refer to Note 34 — Subsequent Events.resumption of the payment of cash dividends and purchases of outstanding shares of common and preferred stock.
Legal surplus
     The Banking Act of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico requires that a minimum of 10% of FirstBank’s net income for the year be transferred to legal surplus until such surplus equals the total of paid-in-capital on common and preferred stock. Amounts transferred to the legal surplus account from the retained earnings account are not available for distribution to the stockholders.
Dividends
     On June 30, 2008, the Corporation announced that the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, under the delegated authority of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, terminated the Order to Cease and Desist dated March 16, 2006, relating to the mortgage-related transactions with other financial institutions, after completing its examination of the Corporation.
     During the effectiveness of the Consent Orders, the Corporation had to request and obtain written approval from the Federal Reserve Board for the payment of dividends by the Corporation to the holders of its preferred stock, common stock and trust preferred stock. The Corporation has taken the required actions, including a substantial reduction of the credit risk concentration in connection with certain loans outstanding to two large mortgage originators in Puerto Rico to levels acceptable to regulatory agencies and within parameters set forth in the policies adopted by the Corporation.

F-44F-53


FIRST BANCORP
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
Note 2224 — Employees’ Benefit Plan
     FirstBank provides contributory retirement plans pursuant to Section 1165(e) of the Puerto Rico Internal Revenue Code for Puerto Rico employees and Section 401(k) of the U.S. Internal Revenue Code for U.S.Virgin Islands and U.S. employees (the “Plans”). All employees are eligible to participate in the Plans after three months of service for purposes of making elective deferral contributions and one year of service for purposes of sharing in the Bank’s matching, qualified matching and qualified nonelective contributions. Under the provisions of the Plans, the Bank contributes 25% of the first 4% of the participant’s compensation contributed to the Plans on a pre-tax basis. Participants are permitted to contribute up to $8,000 for 2008, $9,000 for 2009 and 2010, $10,000 for 2011 and 2012 and $12,000 beginning on January 1, 2013 ($15,500 for 2008 and $16,50016,500 for 2009 for U.S.V.I. and U.S. employees). Additional contributions to the Plans are voluntarily made by the Bank as determined by its Board of Directors. The Bank had a total plan expense of $1.5$1.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2009, $1.5 million for 2008 and $1.4 million for each of the years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006.2007.
     FirstBank Florida provides a contributory retirement plan pursuant to Section 401(k) of the U.S. Internal Revenue Code for its U.S. employees (the “Plan”). All employees are eligible to participate in the Plan after six months of service. Under the provisions of the Plan, FirstBank Florida contributes 100% of the first 3% of the participant’s contribution and 50% of the next 2% participant’s contribution up to a maximum of 3%4% of the participant’s compensation. Participants are permitted to contribute up to 18% of their annual compensation, limited to $16,500 per year (participants over 50 years of age are permitted an additional $5,000$5,500 contribution). FirstBank Florida had total plan expenses of approximately $151,000 for 2009, approximately $157,000 for 2008 and approximately $114,000 for 2007 and approximately $87,000 for 2006.2007.
Note 2325 — Other Non-interest Income
     A detail of other non-interest income follows:
                        
 Year Ended December 31,  Year Ended December 31, 
 2008 2007 2006  2009 2008 2007 
 (In thousands)  (In thousands) 
Other commissions and fees $420 $273 $1,470  $469 $420 $273 
Insurance income 10,157 10,877 11,284  8,668 10,157 10,877 
Other 18,150 13,322 12,857  17,893 18,150 13,322 
              
Total $28,727 $24,472 $25,611  $27,030 $28,727 $24,472 
              
Note 2426 — Other Non-interest Expenses
     A detail of other non-interest expenses follows:
                        
 Year Ended December 31,  Year Ended December 31, 
 2008 2007 2006  2009 2008 2007 
 (In thousands)  (In thousands) 
Servicing and processing fees $9,918 $6,574 $7,297  $10,174 $9,918 $6,574 
Communications 8,856 8,562 9,165  8,283 8,856 8,562 
Depreciation and expenses on revenue — earning equipment 2,227 2,144 2,455  1,341 2,227 2,144 
Supplies and printing 3,530 3,402 3,494  3,073 3,530 3,402 
Core deposit intangible impairment 3,988   
Other 17,443 18,744 14,309  17,483 17,443 18,744 
              
Total $41,974 $39,426 $36,720  $44,342 $41,974 $39,426 
              

F-45F-54


FIRST BANCORP
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
Note 2527 — Income Taxes
     Income tax expense includes Puerto Rico and Virgin Islands income taxes as well as applicable U.S. federal and state taxes. The Corporation is subject to Puerto Rico income tax on its income from all sources. As a Puerto Rico corporation, First BanCorp is treated as a foreign corporation for U.S. income tax purposes and is generally subject to United States income tax only on its income from sources within the United States or income effectively connected with the conduct of a trade or business within the United States. Any such tax paid is creditable, withwithin certain conditions and limitations, against the Corporation’s Puerto Rico tax liability. The Corporation is also subject to U.S.Virgin Islands taxes on its income from sources within thisthat jurisdiction. Any such tax paid is also creditable against the Corporation’s Puerto Rico tax liability, subject to certain conditions and limitations.
     Under the Puerto Rico Internal Revenue Code of 1994, as amended (the “PR Code”), the Corporation and its subsidiaries are treated as separate taxable entities and are not entitled to file consolidated tax returns and, thus, the Corporation is not able to utilize losses from one subsidiary to offset gains in another subsidiary. Accordingly, in order to obtain a tax benefit from a net operating loss, a particular subsidiary must be able to demonstrate sufficient taxable income within the applicable carry forward period (7 years under the PR Code). The PR Code provides a dividend received deduction of 100% on dividends received from “controlled” subsidiaries subject to taxation in Puerto Rico and 85% on dividends received from other taxable domestic corporations. Dividend payments from a U.S. subsidiary to the Corporation are subject to a 10% withholding tax based on the provisions of the U.S. Internal Revenue Code.
     Under the PR Code, First BanCorp is subject to a maximum statutory tax rate of 39%, except that in years 2005 and 2006, an additional transitory tax rate of 2.5% was signed into law by. In 2009 the Governor of Puerto Rico. In August 2005, the Government of Puerto Rico Government approved Act No. 7 (the “Act”), to stimulate Puerto Rico’s economy and to reduce the Puerto Rico Government’s fiscal deficit. The Act imposes a transitoryseries of temporary and permanent measures, including the imposition of a 5% surtax over the total income tax rate of 2.5% that increaseddetermined, which is applicable to corporations, among others, whose combined income exceeds $100,000, effectively resulting in an increase in the maximum statutory tax rate from 39.0%39% to 41.5% for a two-year period.40.95% and an increase in capital gain statutory tax rate from 15% to 15.75%. This law wastemporary measure is effective for taxabletax years beginningthat commenced after December 31, 20042008 and ending on or before December 31, 2006. Accordingly, the Corporation recorded an additional current income tax provision of $2.8 million during the year ended December 31, 2006. Deferred tax amounts were adjusted for the effect of the change in the income tax rate expected to apply to taxable income in the period in which the deferred tax asset or liability is expected to be settled or realized.
     In addition, on May 13, 2006, with an effective date of January 1, 2006, the Governor of Puerto Rico approved an additional transitory tax rate of 2.0% applicable only to companies covered by the Puerto Rico Banking Act as amended, such as FirstBank, which raised the maximum statutory tax rate to 43.5% for taxable years commenced during calendar year 2006. This law was effective for taxable years beginning after December 31, 2005 and ending on or before December 31, 2006. Accordingly, the Corporation recorded an additional current income tax provision of $1.7 million during the year ended December 31, 2006.2012. The PR Code also includes an alternative minimum tax of 22% that applies if the Corporation’s regular income tax liability is less than the alternative minimum tax requirements.
     The Corporation has maintained an effective tax rate lower than the maximum statutory rate mainly by investing in government obligations and mortgage-backed securities exempt from U.S. and Puerto Rico income taxes and by doing business through International Banking Entities (“IBEs”) of the Corporation and the Bank and through the Bank’s subsidiary, FirstBank Overseas Corporation, in which the interest income and gain on sales is exempt from Puerto Rico and U.S. income taxation. Under the Act, all IBEs are subject to the special 5% tax on their net income not otherwise subject to tax pursuant to the PR Code. This temporary measure is also effective for tax years that commenced after December 31, 2008 and before January 1, 2012. The IBEs and FirstBank Overseas Corporation were created under the International Banking Entity Act of Puerto Rico, which provides for total Puerto Rico tax exemption on net income derived by IBEs operating in Puerto Rico. IBEs that operate as a unit of a bank pay income taxes at normal rates to the extent that the IBEs’ net income exceeds 20% of the bank’s total net taxable income.
     The effect of a higher temporary statutory tax rate over the normal statutory tax rate resulted in an additional income tax benefit of $10.4 million for 2009 that was partially offset by an income tax provision of $6.6 million related to the special 5% tax on the operations FirstBank Overseas Corporation.
     The components of income tax expense for the years ended December 31 are summarized below:
             
  Year Ended December 31, 
  2008  2007  2006 
  (In thousands) 
Current income tax expense $(7,121) $(7,925) $(59,157)
Deferred income tax benefit (expense)  38,853   (13,658)  31,715 
          
Total income tax benefit (expense) $31,732  $(21,583) $(27,442)
          
             
  Year Ended December 31, 
  2009  2008  2007 
      (In thousands)     
Current income tax benefit (expense) $11,520  $(7,121) $(7,925)
Deferred income tax (expense) benefit  (16,054)  38,853   (13,658)
          
Total income tax (expense) benefit $(4,534) $31,732  $(21,583)
          

F-46F-55


FIRST BANCORP
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
     The differences between the income tax expense applicable to income before provision for income taxes and the amount computed by applying the statutory tax rate in Puerto Rico were as follows:
                                                
 Year Ended December 31,  Year Ended December 31, 
 2008 2007 2006  2009 2008 2007 
 % of % of % of  % of % of % of 
 Pre-Tax Pre-Tax Pre-Tax  Pre-Tax Pre-Tax Pre-Tax 
 Amount Income Amount Income Amount Income  Amount Income Amount Income Amount Income 
 (Dollars in thousands)  (Dollars in thousands) 
Computed income tax at statutory rate $(30,500)  (39.0)% $(34,990)  (39.0)% $(46,512)  (41.5)% $110,832  40.95% $(30,500)  (39.0)% $(34,990)  (39.0)%
Federal and state taxes        (227)  (0.3)%  (1,657)  (1.5)%  (311)  (0.1)%   0.0%  (227)  (0.3)%
Non-tax deductible expenses   0.0%  (1,111)  (1.2)%  (2,232)  (2.0)%   0.0%   0.0%  (1,111)  (1.2)%
Benefit of net exempt income 49,799  63.7% 23,974  26.7% 34,601  30.9% 52,293  19.3% 49,799  63.7% 23,974  26.7%
Deferred tax valuation allowance  (2,446)  (3.1)% 1,250  1.4%  (3,209)  (2.9)%  (184,397)  (68.1)%  (2,446)  (3.1)% 1,250  1.4%
2% temporary tax applicable to banks   0.0%   0.0%  (1,704)  (1.5)%
Net operating loss carry forward  (402)  (0.5)%  (7,003)  (7.8)%   0.0%   0.0%  (402)  (0.5)%  (7,003)  (7.8)%
Reversal of Unrecognized Tax Benefits (FIN 48) 10,559  13.5%   0.0%   0.0%
Reversal of Unrecognized Tax Benefits 18,515  6.8% 10,559  13.5%   0.0%
Settlement payment — closing agreement 5,395  6.9%   0.0%   0.0%   0.0% 5,395  6.9%   0.0%
Other-net  (673)  (0.8)%  (3,476)  (3.9)%  (6,729)  (6.0)%  (1,466)  (0.5)%  (673)  (0.8)%  (3,476)  (3.9)%
                          
Total income tax benefit (provision) $31,732  40.7% $(21,583)  (24.1)% $(27,442)  (24.5)%
Total income tax (provision) benefit $(4,534)  (1.7)% $31,732  40.7% $(21,583)  (24.1)%
                          
     Deferred income taxes reflect the net tax effects of temporary differences between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities for financial reporting purposes and their tax bases. Significant components of the Corporation’s deferred tax assets and liabilities as of December 31, 20082009 and 20072008 were as follows:
                
 December 31,  December 31, 
 2008 2007  2009 2008 
 (In thousands)  (In thousands) 
Deferred tax asset:  
Allowance for loan and lease losses $106,879 $74,118  $212,933 $106,879 
Unrealized losses on derivative activities 1,912 4,358  1,028 1,912 
Deferred compensation 682 1,301  41 682 
Legal reserve 211 123  500 211 
Reserve for insurance premium cancellations 679 711  649 679 
Net operating loss and donation carryforward available 1,286 7,198  68,572 1,286 
Impairment on investments 5,910 4,205  4,622 5,910 
Tax credits available for carryforward 5,409 7,117  3,838 5,409 
Unrealized net loss on available-for-sale securities 22 333  20 22 
Realized loss on investments 136   142 136 
Settlement payment — closing agreement 9,652   7,313 9,652 
Interest expense accrual — FIN 48 2,658  
Interest expense accrual — Unrecognized Tax Benefits  2,658 
Other reserves and allowances 7,010 3,490  12,665 7,010 
          
Deferred tax asset 142,446 102,954  312,323 142,446 
  
Deferred tax liability:  
Unrealized gain on available-for-sale securities 716   4,629 716 
Differences between the assigned values and tax bases of assets and liabilities recognized in purchase business combinations 4,715 4,885  3,015 4,715 
Unrealized gain on other investments 578 582  468 578 
Other 1,123 2,446  3,342 1,123 
          
Deferred tax liability 7,132 7,913  11,454 7,132 
  
Valuation allowance  (7,275)  (4,911)  (191,672)  (7,275)
          
  
Deferred income taxes, net $128,039 $90,130  $109,197 $128,039 
          
     In assessingFor 2009, the realizabilityCorporation recorded income tax expense of $4.5 million compared to an income tax benefit of $31.7 million for 2008. The fluctuation in income tax expense mainly resulted from a $184.4 million non-cash increase of the valuation allowance for the Corporation’s deferred tax asset. The increase in the valuation allowance does not have any impact on the Corporation’s liquidity or cash flow, nor does such an allowance preclude the Corporation from using tax losses, tax credits or other deferred tax assets management considers whether it is more likely than not that some portion or allin the future. As of December 31, 2009, the deferred tax assets will not be realized. The ultimate realizationasset, net of deferred tax assets is dependent upon the generationa valuation allowance of future taxable income during the periods in which those temporary differences become deductible. Management considers the scheduled reversal$191.7 million, amounted to $109.2 million compared to $128.0 million as of deferred tax liabilities, projected future taxableDecember 31, 2008.

F-47F-56


FIRST BANCORP
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
     Accounting for income and tax planning strategies in making this assessment. Ataxes requires that companies assess whether a valuation allowance of $7.3 million and $4.9 million is reflected in 2008 and 2007, respectively, related toshould be recorded against their deferred tax assets arising from temporary differences for which the Corporation could not determine the likelihood of its realization. Basedbased on the informationconsideration of all available including projections for future taxable income over the periods in whichevidence, using a “more likely than not” realization standard. The valuation allowance should be sufficient to reduce the deferred tax assets are deductible, management believes itasset to the amount that is more likely than not to be realized. In making such assessment, significant weight is to be given to evidence that can be objectively verified, including both positive and negative evidence. The accounting for income taxes guidance requires the Corporation willconsideration of all sources of taxable income available to realize all other items comprising the net deferred tax asset, including the future reversal of existing temporary differences, future taxable income exclusive of reversing temporary differences and carryforwards, taxable income in carryback years and tax planning strategies. In assessing the weight of positive and negative evidence, a significant negative factor that resulted in the increase of the valuation allowance was that the Corporation’s banking subsidiary FirstBank Puerto Rico was in a three-year historical cumulative loss as of the end of the year 2009, mainly as a result of charges to the provision for loan and lease losses, especially in the construction portfolio both in Puerto Rico and the United States, resulting from the economic downturn. As of December 31, 20082009, management concluded that $109.2 million of the deferred tax assets will be realized. In assessing the likelihood of realizing the deferred tax assets, management has considered all four sources of taxable income mentioned above and 2007. The amounteven though sufficient profits are expected in the next seven years to realized the deferred tax asset, given current uncertain economic conditions, the Company has only relied on tax-planning strategies as the main source of taxable income to realize the deferred tax asset amount. Among the most significant tax-planning strategies identified are: (i) sale of appreciated assets, (ii) consolidation of profitable and unprofitable companies (in Puerto Rico each Company files a separate tax return; no consolidated tax returns are permitted), and (iii) deferral of deductions without affecting its utilization. Management will continue monitoring the likelihood of realizing the deferred tax assets in future periods. If future events differ from management’s December 31, 2009 assessment, an additional valuation allowance may need to be established which may have a material adverse effect on the Corporation’s results of operations. Similarly, to the extent the realization of a portion, or all, of the tax asset becomes “more likely than not” based on changes in circumstances (such as, improved earnings, changes in tax laws or other relevant changes), a reversal of that portion of the deferred tax asset considered realizable, however, couldvaluation allowance will then be reduced in the near term if estimates of future taxable income during the carryforward period are reduced.recorded.
     The tax effect of the unrealized holding gain or loss on securities available-for-sale, excluding that on securities held by the Corporation’s international banking entities which is exempt, was computed based on a 15%15.75% capital gain tax rate, and is included in accumulated other comprehensive income as part of stockholders’ equity.
     The Corporation adopted FIN 48 asAt December 31, 2009, the Corporation’s deferred tax asset related to loss and other carry-forwards was $74 million. This was comprised of January 1, 2007. FIN 48net operating loss carry-forward of $68.1 million, which will begin expiring in 2016, an alternative minimum tax credit carry-forward of $1.6 million, an extraordinary tax credit carryover of $3.8 million, and a charitable contribution carry-forward of $0.5 million which will begin expiring in 2014.
     In June 2006, the FASB issued authoritative guidance that prescribes a comprehensive model for the financial statement recognition, measurement, presentation and disclosure of income tax uncertainties with respect to positions taken or expected to be taken on income tax returns. Under FIN 48,the authoritative accounting guidance, income tax benefits are recognized and measured based upon a two-step model: 1) a tax position must be more likely than not to be sustained based solely on its technical merits in order to be recognized, and 2) the benefit is measured as the largest dollar amount of that position that is more likely than not to be sustained upon settlement. The difference between the benefit recognized in accordance with FIN 48this model and the tax benefit claimed on a tax return is referred to as an unrecognizedUTB.
     During the second quarter of 2009, the Corporation reversed UTBs by $10.8 million and related accrued interest of $5.3 million due to the lapse of the statute of limitations for the 2004 taxable year. Also, in July 2009, the

F-57


FIRST BANCORP
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
Corporation entered into an agreement with the Puerto Rico Department of the Treasury to conclude an income tax benefit (“UTB”).
audit and to eliminate all possible income and withholding tax deficiencies related to taxable years 2005, 2006, 2007 and 2008. As a result of such agreement, the Corporation reversed during the third quarter of 2009 the remaining UTBs and related interest by approximately $2.9 million, net of the payment made to the Puerto Rico Department of the Treasury in connection with the conclusion of the tax audit. There were no UTBs outstanding as of December 31, 2009. The beginning UTB balance of $15.6 million as of December 31, 2008 (excluding accrued interest of $6.8 million) reconciles to the ending balance in the following table.
Reconciliation of the Corporation’s UTBs amounted to $15.6 million (excluding accrued interest), all of which would, if recognized, affect the Corporation’s effective tax rate.Change in Unrecognized Tax Benefits
     
(In thousands)    
Balance at beginning of year $15,600 
Increases related to positions taken during prior years  173 
Decreases related to positions taken during prior years  (317)
Expiration of statute of limitations  (10,733)
Audit settlement  (4,723)
    
Balance at end of year $ 
    
     The Corporation classifiesclassified all interest and penalties, if any, related to tax uncertainties as income tax expense. As of December 31, 2008, and 2007, the Corporation’s accrual for interest that relaterelates to tax uncertainties amounted to $6.8 million and $8.6 million, respectively.million. As of December 31, 2008, and 2007 there is no need to accrue for the payment of penalties. For the yearsyear ended on December 31, 2008 and 2007,2009, the total amount of accrued interest recognizedreversed by the Corporation as part ofthrough income tax expense related to tax uncertainties was $1.7 million and $2.3 million, respectively. The beginning UTB balance of $22.1 million reconciles to the December 31, 2008 balance in the following table.
     
Reconciliation of the Change in Unrecognized Tax Benefits    
(In thousands)    
Balance at beginning of year $22,147 
Increases related to positions taken during prior years  511 
Expiration of statute of limitations  (7,058)
    
Balance at end of year $15,600 
    
$6.8 million. The amount of UTBs may increase or decrease in the future for various reasons, including changes in the amounts for current tax year positions, the expiration of open income tax returns due to the expiration of statutes of limitations, changes in management’s judgment about the level of uncertainty, the status of examinations, litigation and legislative activity and the addition or elimination of uncertain tax positions. As reflected in the table above, during 2008, the Corporation reversed UTBs by approximately $7.1 million and accrued interest of $3.5 million as a result of a lapse of the applicable statute of limitations for the 2003 taxable year. For the remaining outstanding UTBs, the Corporation cannot make any reasonable reliable estimate of the timing of future cash flows or changes, if any, associated with such obligations.
     The Corporation’s liability for income taxes includes the liability for UTBs and interest which relate to tax years still subject to review by taxing authorities. Audit periods remain open for review until the statute of limitations has expired. The statute of limitations under the PR Code is 4 years; and under the applicable law for Virgin Islands and U.S. income tax purposes is 3 years after a tax return is due or filed, whichever is later. The completion of an audit by the taxing authorities or the expiration of the statute of limitations for a given audit period could result in an adjustment to the Corporation’s liability for income taxes. Any such adjustment could be material to results of

F-48


FIRST BANCORP
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
operations for any given quarterly or annual period based, in part, upon the results of operations for the given period. All tax years subsequent to 2003 remain open to examination under the PR Code and taxable years subsequent to 2004 remain open to examination for Virgin Islands and U.S. income tax purposes.
Note 2628 — Lease Commitments
     As of December 31, 2008,2009, certain premises are leased with terms expiring through the year 2022.2034. The Corporation has the option to renew or extend certain leases beyond the original term. Some of these leases require the payment of insurance, increases in property taxes and other incidental costs. As of December 31, 2008,2009, the obligation under various leases follows:
        
 Amount  Amount 
 (In thousands)  (In thousands) 
2009 $7,669 
2010 6,192  $10,342 
2011 4,754  7,680 
2012 4,141  6,682 
2013 3,332  4,906 
2014 and later years 25,327 
2014 3,972 
2015 and later years 30,213 
      
Total $51,415  $63,795 
      
     Rental expense included in occupancy and equipment expense was $11.6$11.8 million in 2008 (20072009 (2008$11.2$11.6 million; 20062007$10.2$11.2 million).
Note 2729 — Fair Value
     As discussed in Note 1 — “Nature of Business and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies”, effective January 1,In February 2007, the Corporation adopted SFAS 157,FASB issued authoritative guidance which provides a framework for measuring fair value under GAAP.
     The Corporation also adopted SFAS 159 effective January 1, 2007. SFAS 159 generally permits the measurement of selected eligible financial instruments at fair value at specified election dates. The Corporation elected to adopt the fair value option for certain of its brokered CDs and medium-term notes (“SFAS 159 liabilities”) on the adoption date.notes.
     The following table summarizes the impact of adopting the fair value option for certain brokered CDs and medium-term notes on January 1, 2007. Amounts shown represent the carrying value of the affected instruments before and after the changes in accounting resulting from the adoption of SFAS 159.the fair value option.

F-58


FIRST BANCORP
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
                        
   Opening Statement of  Opening Statement of 
 Ending Statement of        Financial Condition  Ending Statement of Financial Condition 
 Financial Condition Net Increase in as of January 1, 2007  Financial Condition Net Increase in as of January 1, 2007 
 as of December 31, 2006     Retained Earnings (After Adoption of  as of December 31, 2006 Retained Earnings (After Adoption of 
Transition Impact     (Prior to Adoption) (1) Upon Adoption Fair Value Option)  (Prior to Adoption) (1) Upon Adoption Fair Value Option) 
 (In thousands)  (In thousands) 
Callable brokered CDs $ (4,513,020) $149,621 $(4,363,399) $(4,513,020) $149,621 $(4,363,399)
Medium-term notes  (15,637) 840  (14,797)  (15,637) 840  (14,797)
      
Cumulative-effect adjustment (pre-tax) 150,461  150,461 
Tax impact  (58,683)   (58,683) 
      
Cumulative-effect adjustment (net of tax), increase to retained earnings $91,778 
Cumulative-effect adjustment (net of tax) increased to retained earnings $91,778 
      
 
(1) Net of debt issue costs, placement fees and basis adjustment as of December 31, 2006.
Fair Value Option
Callable Brokered CDs and Certain Medium-Term Notes
     The Corporation elected the fair value option for certain financial liabilities that were hedged with interest rate swaps that were previously designated for fair value hedge accountingaccounting. As of December 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008, these liabilities included certain medium-term notes with a fair value of $13.4 million and $10.1 million, respectively, and principal balance of $15.4 million recorded in accordance with SFAS 133.notes payable. As of December 31, 2008, and 2007, these liabilities recognized at fair value also included callable brokered CDs with an aggregate fair value of $1.15 billion and $4.19 billion, respectively and a principal balance of $1.13 billion, and $4.20 billion, respectively, recorded in interest-bearing deposits, and certain medium-term notes with a fair value of $10.1 million and $14.31 million, respectively, and a principal balance of $15.44 million, respectively, recorded in notes payable.deposits. Interest paid/accrued on these instruments is recorded as part of interest expense and the accrued interest is part of the fair value of the SFAS 159 liabilities.liabilities measured at fair value. Electing the fair value option allows the Corporation to eliminate the burden of complying with the requirements for hedge accounting under SFAS 133 (e.g., documentation and effectiveness assessment) without introducing earnings volatility. Interest rate risk on the callable brokered CDs and medium-term notes measured at fair value under SFAS 159 continues to bewas economically hedged with callable interest rate swaps, with the same terms and conditions.conditions, until they were all called during 2009. The Corporation did not elect the fair value option for the vast majority of other brokered CDs and notes payable because these are not hedged by derivatives.

F-49


FIRST BANCORP
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
     CallableMedium-term notes and callable brokered CDs and medium-term notes for which the Corporation has elected the fair value option arewere priced using observable market data in the institutional markets.
Fair Value Measurement
     SFAS 157The FASB authoritative guidance for fair value measurement defines fair value as the exchange price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date. SFAS 157This guidance also establishes a fair value hierarchy which requires an entity to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value. The standard describes threeThree levels of inputs that may be used to measure fair value:
Level 1 Valuations of Level 1 assets and liabilities are obtained from readily available pricing sources for market transactions involving identical assets or liabilities. Level 1 assets and liabilities include equity securities that are traded in an active exchange market, as well as certain U.S. Treasury and other U.S. government and agency securities and corporate debt securities that are traded by dealers or brokers in active markets.
Level 2 Valuations of Level 2 assets and liabilities are based on observable inputs other than Level 1 prices, such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities, or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of the assets or liabilities. Level 2 assets and liabilities include (i) mortgage-backed securities for which the fair value is estimated based on the value of identical or comparable assets, (ii) debt securities with quoted prices that are traded less frequently than exchange-traded instruments and (iii) derivative contracts and financial liabilities (e.g., callable brokered CDs and medium-term notes elected forto be

F-59


FIRST BANCORP
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
measured at fair value option under SFAS 159)value) whose value is determined using a pricing model with inputs that are observable in the market or can be derived principally from or corroborated by observable market data.
Level 3 Valuations of Level 3 assets and liabilities are based on unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and that are significant to the fair value of the assets or liabilities. Level 3 assets and liabilities include financial instruments whose value is determined using pricing models for which the determination of fair value requires significant management judgment or estimation.
Estimated Fair Value of Financial Instruments
     The information about the estimated fair value of financial instruments required by GAAP is presented hereunder. The aggregate fair value amounts presented do not necessarily represent management’s estimate of the underlying value of the Corporation.
     The estimated fair value is subjective in nature and involves uncertainties and matters of significant judgment and, therefore, cannot be determined with precision. Changes in the underlying assumptions used in calculating fair value could significantly affect the results. In addition, the fair value estimates are based on outstanding balances without attempting to estimate the value of anticipated future business.

F-50


FIRST BANCORP
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
     The following table presents the estimated fair value and carrying value of financial instruments as of December 31, 20082009 and 2007.December 31, 2008.
                         
 Total Carrying Total Carrying  Total Carrying Total Carrying   
 Amount in Amount in  Amount in Amount in   
 Statement of Statement of  Statement of Statement of   
 Financial Fair Value Financial Fair Value Financial Fair Value Financial Fair Value 
 Condition Estimated Condition Estimated Condition Estimated Condition Estimated 
 12/31/2008(1) 12/31/2008(2) 12/31/2007(1) 12/31/2007(2) 12/31/2009 12/31/2009 12/31/2008 12/31/2008 
 (In thousands) (In thousands) 
Assets:
  
Cash and due from banks and money market investments $405,733 $405,733 $378,945 $378,980  $704,084 $704,084 $405,733 $405,733 
Investment securities available for sale 3,862,342 3,862,342 1,286,286 1,286,286  4,170,782 4,170,782 3,862,342 3,862,342 
Investment securities held to maturity 1,706,664 1,720,412 3,277,083 3,261,934  601,619 621,584 1,706,664 1,720,412 
Other equity securities 64,145 64,145 64,908 64,908  69,930 69,930 64,145 64,145 
Loans receivable, including loans held for sale 13,088,292 11,799,746  13,949,226 13,088,292 
Less: allowance for loan and lease losses  (281,526)  (190,168)   (528,120)  (281,526) 
          
Loans, net of allowance 12,806,766 12,416,603 11,609,578 11,513,064  13,421,106 12,811,010 12,806,766 12,416,603 
          
Derivatives, included in assets 8,010 8,010 14,701 14,701  5,936 5,936 8,010 8,010 
  
Liabilities:
  
Deposits 13,057,430 13,221,026 11,034,521 11,030,229  12,669,047 12,801,811 13,057,430 13,221,026 
Federal funds purchased and securities sold under agreements to repurchase 3,421,042 3,655,652 3,094,646 3,137,094 
Loans payable 900,000 900,000   
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase 3,076,631 3,242,110 3,421,042 3,655,652 
Advances from FHLB 1,060,440 1,079,298 1,103,000 1,107,347  978,440 1,025,605 1,060,440 1,079,298 
Notes payable 23,274 18,755 30,543 30,043 
Notes Payable 27,117 25,716 23,274 18,755 
Other borrowings 231,914 81,170 231,817 217,908  231,959 80,267 231,914 81,170 
Derivatives, included in liabilities 8,505 8,505 67,151 67,151  6,467 6,467 8,505 8,505 
(1)This column discloses carrying amount, information required annually by SFAS 107.
(2)This column discloses fair value estimates required annually by SFAS 107.
     Assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis, including financial liabilities for which the Corporation has elected the fair value option, are summarized below:

F-60


                                 
  Asset/Liabilities Measured at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis
  As of December 31, 2008     As of December 31, 2007  
  Fair Value Measurements Using     Fair Value Measurements Using  
  Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Total Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Total
  (In thousands)
Assets:
                                
Investment securities available for sale(1)
 $2,217  $3,746,142  $113,983  $3,862,342  $22,596  $1,130,012  $133,678  $1,286,286 
Derivatives, included in assets(1)
     7,250   760   8,010      9,598   5,103   14,701 
Liabilities:
                                
Callable brokered CDs(2)
     1,150,959      1,150,959      4,186,563      4,186,563 
Notes payable(2)
     10,141      10,141      14,306      14,306 
Derivatives, included in liabilities(1)
     8,505      8,505      67,151      67,151 
FIRST BANCORP
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
                                 
  As of December 31, 2009 As of December 31, 2008
  Fair Value Measurements Using Fair Value Measurements Using
              Assets / Liabilities             Assets / Liabilities
(In thousands) Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 at Fair Value Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 at Fair Value
Assets:                                
Securities available for sale :                                
Equity securities $303  $  $  $303  $669  $  $  $669 
Corporate Bonds              1,548         1,548 
U.S. agency debt and MBS     3,949,799      3,949,799      3,609,009      3,609,009 
Puerto Rico Government Obligations     136,326      136,326      137,133      137,133 
Private label MBS        84,354   84,354         113,983   113,983 
Derivatives, included in assets     1,737   4,199   5,936      7,250   760   8,010 
                                 
Liabilities:                                
Callable brokered CDs                 1,150,959      1,150,959 
Medium-term notes     13,361      13,361      10,141      10,141 
Derivatives, included in liabilities     6,467      6,467      8,505      8,505 

F-61


FIRST BANCORP
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
             
  Changes in Fair Value for the Year Ended
December 31, 2009, for Items Measured at Fair Value Pursuant
to Election of the Fair Value Option
 
          Total 
          Changes in Fair Value 
  Unrealized Gains and  Unrealized Losses and  Unrealized Gains (Losses) 
  Interest Expense included  Interest Expense included  and Interest Expense 
  in Interest Expense  in Interest Expense  included in 
(In thousands) on Deposits(1)  on Notes Payable(1)  Current-Period Earnings(1) 
Callable brokered CDs $(2,068) $  $(2,068)
Medium-term notes     (4,069)  (4,069)
          
  $(2,068) $(4,069) $(6,137)
          
 
(1) CarriedChanges in fair value for the year ended December 31, 2009 include interest expense on callable brokered CDs of $10.8 million and interest expense on medium-term notes of $0.8 million. Interest expense on callable brokered CDs and medium-term notes that have been elected to be carried at fair value prior toare recorded in interest expense in the adoptionConsolidated Statements of SFAS 159.
(2)Amounts represent item for which the Corporation has elected the fair value option under SFAS 159.Income based on such instruments contractual coupons.
            
 Changes in Fair Value for the Year Ended 
 December 31, 2008, for items Measured at Fair Value Pursuant             
 to Election of the Fair Value Option  Changes in Fair Value for the Year Ended
December 31, 2008, for Items Measured at Fair Value Pursuant
to Election of the Fair Value Option
 
 Total  Total 
 Changes in Fair Value  Changes in Fair Value 
 Unrealized Losses and Unrealized Gains and Unrealized (Losses) Gains  Unrealized Losses and Unrealized Gains and Unrealized (Losses) Gains 
 Interest Expense included Interest Expense included and Interest Expense  Interest Expense included Interest Expense included and Interest Expense 
 in Interest Expense in Interest Expense included in  in Interest Expense in Interest Expense included in 
(In thousands) on Deposits(1) on Notes Payable(1) Current-Period Earnings(1)  on Deposits(1) on Notes Payable(1) Current-Period Earnings(1) 
Callable brokered CDs $(174,208) $ $(174,208) $(174,208) $ $(174,208)
Medium-term notes  3,316 3,316   3,316 3,316 
              
 $(174,208) $3,316 $(170,892) $(174,208) $3,316 $(170,892)
              
 
(1) Changes in fair value for the year ended December 31, 2008 include interest expense on callable brokered CDs of $120.0 million and interest expense on medium-term notes of $0.8 million. Interest expense on callable brokered CDs and medium-term notes that have been elected to be carried at fair value under the provisions of SFAS 159 isare recorded in interest expense in the Consolidated Statements of Income based on such instruments contractual coupons.
            
 Changes in Fair Value for the Year Ended 
 December 31, 2007, for items Measured at Fair Value Pursuant             
 to Election of the Fair Value Option  Changes in Fair Value for the Year Ended
December 31, 2007, for Items Measured at Fair Value Pursuant
to Election of the Fair Value Option
 
 Total  Total 
 Changes in Fair Value  Changes in Fair Value 
 Unrealized Losses and Unrealized Gains and Unrealized (Losses) Gains  Unrealized Losses and Unrealized Gains and Unrealized (Losses) Gains 
 Interest Expense included Interest Expense included and Interest Expense  Interest Expense included Interest Expense included and Interest Expense 
 in Interest Expense in Interest Expense included in  in Interest Expense in Interest Expense included in 
(In thousands) on Deposits(1) on Notes Payable(1) Current-Period Earnings(1)  on Deposits(1) on Notes Payable(1) Current-Period Earnings(1) 
Callable brokered CDs $(298,641) $ $(298,641) $(298,641) $ $(298,641)
Medium-term notes   (294)  (294)   (294)  (294)
              
 $(298,641) $(294) $(298,935) $(298,641) $(294) $(298,935)
              
 
(1) Changes in fair value for the year ended December 31, 2007 include interest expense on callable brokered CDs of $227.5 million and interest expense on medium-term notes of $0.8 million. Interest expense on callable brokered CDs and medium-term notes that have been elected to be carried at fair value under the provisions of SFAS 159 isare recorded in interest expense in the Consolidated Statements of Income based on such instruments contractual coupons.

F-51F-62


FIRST BANCORP
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
     The table below presents a reconciliation offor all assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3) for the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007.
                                        
 Total Fair Value Measurements Total Fair Value Measurements    Total Fair Value Measurements Total Fair Value Measurements Total Fair Value Measurements 
 (Year Ended December 31, 2008) (Year Ended December 31, 2007)    (Year Ended December 31, 2009) (Year Ended December 31, 2008) (Year Ended December 31, 2007) 
Level 3 Instruments Only Securities Securities  Securities Securities   Securities 
(In thousands) Derivatives(1) Available For Sale(2) Derivatives(1) Available For Sale(2)  Derivatives(1) Available For Sale(2) Derivatives(1) Available For Sale(2) Derivatives(1) Available For Sale(2) 
Beginning balance $5,102 $133,678 $9,087 $370  $760 $113,983 $5,102 $133,678 $9,087 $370 
Total gains or (losses) (realized/unrealized):  
Included in earnings  (4,342)   (3,985)   3,439  (1,270)  (4,342)   (3,985)  
Included in other comprehensive income   (1,830)   (28,407)   (2,610)   (1,830)   (28,407)
New instruments acquired    182,376       182,376 
Principal repayments and amortization   (17,865)   (20,661)   (25,749)   (17,865)   (20,661)
Transfers in and/or out of Level 3     
                      
Ending balance $760 $113,983 $5,102 $133,678  $4,199 $84,354 $760 $113,983 $5,102 $133,678 
                      
 
(1) Amounts related to the valuation of interest rate cap agreements which were carried at fair value prior to the adoption of SFAS 159.agreements.
 
(2) Amounts mostly related to certain private label mortgage-backed securities which were carried at fair value prior to the adoption of SFAS 159.securities.
     The table below summarizes changes in unrealized gains and losses recorded in earnings for the years ended December 31, 20082009 and 20072008 for Level 3 assets and liabilities that are still held at the end of each year.
                        
 Changes in Unrealized Gains (Losses) Changes in Unrealized Losses Changes in Unrealized Losses 
 (Year Ended December 31, 2009) (Year Ended December 31, 2008) (Year Ended December 31, 2007) 
         Securities Securities Securities 
Level 3 Instruments Only Changes in Unrealized Losses Changes in Unrealized Losses  Available Available Available 
(In thousands)     (Year Ended December 31, 2008)      (Year Ended December 31, 2007)  Derivatives For Sale Derivatives For Sale Derivatives For Sale 
Changes in unrealized losses
relating to assets still held at reporting date
(1) (2):
 
Changes in unrealized losses relating to assets still held at reporting date(1):
 
 
Interest income on loans $(59) $(440) $45 $ $(59) $ $(440) $ 
Interest income on investment securities  (4,283)  (3,545) 3,394   (4,283)   (3,545)  
Net impairment losses on investment securities (credit component)   (1,270)     
                  
 $(4,342) $(3,985) $3,439 $(1,270) $(4,342) $ $(3,985) $ 
                  
 
(1) Amount represents valuationUnrealized losses of interest rate cap agreements which were carried at fair value prior to the adoption of SFAS 159.
(2)Unrealized loss of$2.6 million, $1.8 million and $28.4 million on Level 3 available for saleavailable-for-sale securities was recognized as part of other comprehensive income for the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively.

F-52


FIRST BANCORP
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
     Additionally, fair value is used on a non-recurringno-recurring basis to evaluate certain assets in accordance with GAAP. Adjustments to fair value usually result from the application of lower-of-cost-or marketlower-of-cost-or-market accounting (e.g., loans held for sale carried at the lower of cost or fair value and repossessed assets) or write-downs of individual assets (e.g., goodwill, loans).
     As of December 31, 2008,2009, impairment or valuation adjustments were recorded for assets recognized at fair value on a non-recurring basis as shown in the following table:
                    
 Valuation                  
 allowance as of Losses recorded for Losses recorded for
 December 31, the Year Ended the Year Ended
 Carrying value as of December 31, 2008 2008 December 31, 2008 Carrying value as of December 31, 2009 December 31, 2009
 Level 1 Level 2 Level 3  Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 
 (In thousands) (In thousands)
Loans receivable (1) $ $ $209,900 $50,512 $51,037  $ $ $1,103,069 $144,024 
Other Real Estate Owned (2)   37,246 11,961 7,698    69,304 8,419 
Core deposit intangible (3)   6,683 3,988 
Loans held for sale (4)  20,775  58 
 
(1) Mainly impaired commercial and construction loans. The impairment was generally measured based on the fair value of the collateral in accordance with the provisions of SFAS 114.collateral. The fair values are derived from appraisals that take into consideration prices in observed transactions involving similar assets in similar locations but adjusted for specific characteristics and assumptions of the collateral (e.g. absorption rates), which are not market observableobservable.
(2)The fair value is derived from appraisals that take into consideration prices in observed transactions involving similar assets in similar locations but adjusted for specific characteristics and have become significantassumptions of the properties (e.g. absorption rates), which are not market observable. Losses are related to market valuation adjustments after the transfer from the loan to the Other Real Estate Owned (“OREO”) portfolio.
(3)Amount represents core deposit intangible of First Bank Florida. The impairment was generally measured based on internal information about decreases in the base of core deposits acquired upon the acquisition of First Bank Florida.
(4)Fair value is primarily derived from quotations based on the mortgage-backed securities market.

F-63


FIRST BANCORP
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
     As of December 31, 2008, impairment or valuation adjustments were recorded for assets recognized at fair value on a non-recurring basis as shown in the following table:
                 
              Losses recorded for
              the Year Ended
  Carrying value as of December 31, 2008 December 31, 2008
  Level 1 Level 2 Level 3    
  (In thousands)
Loans receivable (1) $  $  $209,900  $51,037 
Other Real Estate Owned (2)        37,246   7,698 
(1)Mainly impaired commercial and construction loans. The impairment was generally measured based on the fair value determination.of the collateral. The fair values are derived from appraisals that take into consideration prices in observed transactions involving similar assets in similar locations but adjusted for specific characteristics and assumptions of the collateral (e.g. absorption rates), which are not market observable.
 
(2) The fair value is derived from appraisals that take into consideration prices in observed transactions involving similar assets in similar locations but adjusted for specific characteristics and assumptions of the properties (e.g. absorption rates), which are not market observable. Valuation allowance is based on market valuation adjustments after the transfer from the loan to the Other Real Estate Owned (“OREO”)OREO portfolio.
     As of December 31, 2007, no impairment or valuation adjustment was recognizedadjustments were recorded for assets recognized at fair value on a non-recurring basis except for certain loans as shown in the following table:
                     
              Valuation  
              allowance as of Losses recorded for
              December 31, the Year Ended
  Carrying value as of December 31, 2007 2007 December 31, 2007
  Level 1 Level 2 Level 3        
  (In thousands)
Loans receivable (1) $  $59,418  $  $7,523  $5,187 
                 
              Losses recorded for
              the Year Ended
  Carrying value as of December 31, 2007 December 31, 2007
  Level 1 Level 2 Level 3    
  (In thousands)
Loans receivable (1) $  $59,418  $  $5,187 
 
(1) Mainly impaired commercial and construction loans. The impairment was measured based on the fair value of the collateral which was derived from appraisals that take into consideration prices in observed transactions involving similar assets in similar locations.
     The following is a description of the valuation methodologies used for instruments for which an estimated fair value is presented as well as for instruments thatfor which the Corporation has elected the fair value option. The estimated fair value was calculated using certain facts and assumptions, which vary depending on the specific financial instrument.
Cash and due from banks and money market investments
     The carrying amountamounts of cash and due from banks and money market investments are reasonable estimates of their fair value. Money market investments include held-to-maturity U.S. Government obligations, which have a contractual maturity of three months or less. The fair value of these securities is based on quoted market prices in active markets that incorporate the risk of nonperformance.
Investment securities available for sale and held to maturity
     The fair value of investment securities is the market value based on quoted market prices, when available, or market prices for identical or comparable assets that are based on observable market parameters including benchmark yields, reported trades, quotes from brokers or dealers, issuer spreads, bids offers and reference data including market research operations. Observable prices in the market already consider the risk of nonperformance. If listed prices or quotes are not available, fair value is based upon models that use unobservable inputs due to the limited market activity of the instrument, as is the case with certain private label mortgage-backed securities held by the Corporation. Refer to NoteNotes 1 and 4 for additional information about the fair value of instruments with limited market activity.private label mortgage-backed securities.

F-64


FIRST BANCORP
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
Other equity securities
     Equity or other securities that do not have a readily available fair value are stated at the net realizable value which management believes is a reasonable proxy for their fair value. This category is principally composed of stock that is owned by the Corporation to comply with Federal Home Loan Bank (FHLB)FHLB regulatory requirements. Their realizable value equals their cost.

F-53


FIRST BANCORP
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
cost as these shares can be freely redeemed at par.
Loans receivable, including loans held for sale
     The fair value of all loans was estimated using discounted cash flow analyses, using interest rates currently being offered for loans with similar terms and credit quality and with adjustments that the Corporation’s Managementmanagement believes a market participant would consider in determining fair value. Loans were classified by type such as commercial, residential mortgage, credit cards and automobile. These asset categories were further segmented into fixed- and adjustable-rate categories. The fair valuevalues of performing fixed-rate and adjustable-rate loans waswere calculated by discounting expected cash flows through the estimated maturity date. Loans with no stated maturity, like credit lines, were valued at book value. Prepayment payment assumptions were considered for non-residential loans. For residential mortgage loans, prepayment estimates were based on prepayment experiences of generic U.S. mortgage-backed securities pools with similar characteristics (e.g. coupon and original term) and adjusted based on the Corporation’s historical data. Discount rates were based on the Treasury and LIBOR/Swap Yield Curves at the date of the analysis, and included appropriate adjustments for expected credit losses and liquidity risk. Low market liquidity resulted in wider market spreads, which adversely affected the fair value of the Corporation’s loans at December 31, 2008.liquidity.
     For impaired collateral dependent loans, the impairment was primarily measured based on the fair value of the collateral, (if collateral dependent), which is derived from appraisals that take into consideration prices in observable transactions involving similar assets in similar locations, in accordance with the provisions of SFAS 114.locations.
Deposits
     The estimated fair value of demand deposits and savings accounts, which are deposits with no defined maturities, equals the amount payable on demand at the reporting date. For deposits with stated maturities, but that reprice at least quarterly, the fair value is also estimated to be the recorded amounts at the reporting date.
     The fair values of retail fixed-rate time deposits, with stated maturities, are based on the present value of the future cash flows expected to be paid on the deposits. The cash flows were based on contractual maturities; no early repayments are assumed. Discount rates were based on the LIBOR yield curve.
     The estimated fair value of total deposits excludes the fair value of core deposit intangibles, which represent the value of the customer relationship measured by the value of demand deposits and savings deposits that bear a low or zero rate of interest and do not fluctuate in response to changes in interest rates.
     The fair value of callable brokered CDs, which are included within deposits, is determined using discounted cash flow analyses over the full term of the CDs. The valuation uses a “Hull-White Interest Rate Tree” approach, for those CDs with callable option components, an industry-standard approach for valuing instruments with interest rate call options. The model assumes that the embedded options are exercised economically. The fair value of the CDs is computed using the outstanding principal amount. The discount rates used are based on US dollar LIBOR and swap rates. At-the-money implied swaption volatility term structure (volatility by time to maturity) is used to calibrate the model to current market prices and value the cancellation option in the deposits.prices. The fair value does not incorporate the risk of nonperformance, since the callable brokered CDs are generally participated out by brokers in shares of less than $100,000 and insured by the FDIC. Refer
Loans payable
Loans payable consisted of short-term borrowings under the FED Discount Window Program. Due to Note 1 for additional information.the short-term nature of these borrowings, their outstanding balances are estimated to be the fair value.
Federal funds purchased and securitiesSecurities sold under agreements to repurchase
     Federal funds purchased and someSome repurchase agreements reprice at least quarterly, and their outstanding balances are estimated to be their fair value. Where longer commitments are involved, fair value is estimated using exit price indications of the cost of

F-65


FIRST BANCORP
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
unwinding the transactions as of December 31, 2008.the end of the reporting period. Securities sold under agreements to repurchase are fully collateralized by investment securities.
Advances from FHLB
     The fair value of advances from FHLB with fixed maturities is determined using discounted cash flow analyses over the full term of the borrowings, or using indications of the fair value of similar transactions. The cash flows assumedassume no early repayment of the borrowings. Discount rates are based on the LIBOR yield curve. For advances from FHLB that reprice quarterly, their outstanding balances are estimated to be their fair value. Advances from FHLB are fully collateralized by mortgage loans and, to a lesser extent, investment securities.

F-54


FIRST BANCORP
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
Derivative instruments
     The fair value of most of the derivative instruments is based on observable market parameters and takes into consideration the credit risk component of paying counterparts when appropriate.appropriate, except when collateral is pledged. That is, on interest rate swaps, the credit risk of both counterparts is included in the valuation; and on options and caps, only the seller’s credit risk is considered. The “Hull-White Interest Rate Tree” approach is used to value the option components of derivative instruments, and discounting of the cash flows is performed using USDUS dollar LIBOR-based discount rates or yield curves that account for the industry sector and the credit rating of the counterparty and/or the Corporation. Derivatives are mainly composed ofinclude interest rate swaps used for protection against rising interest rates and, prior to June 30, 2009, included interest rate swaps to economically hedge brokered CDs and medium-term notes. For these interest rate swaps, a credit component iswas not considered in the valuation since the Corporation has fully collateralized with investment securities any mark to market loss with the counterparty and, if there arewere market gains, the counterparty musthad to deliver collateral to the Corporation.
     Certain derivatives with limited market activity, as is the case with derivative instruments named as “reference caps,” are valued using models that consider unobservable market parameters (Level 3). Reference caps are used mainly to hedge interest rate risk inherent in private label mortgage-backed securities, thus are tied to the notional amount of the underlying fixed-rate mortgage loans originated in the United States. Significant inputs used for fair value determination consist of specific characteristics such as information used in the prepayment model which follows the amortizing schedule of the underlying loans, which is an unobservable input. The valuation model uses the Black formula, which is a benchmark standard in the financial industry. The Black formula is similar to the Black-Scholes formula for valuing stock options except that the spot price of the underlying is replaced by the forward price. The Black formula uses as inputs the strike price of the cap, forward LIBOR rates, volatility estimates and discount rates to estimate the option value. LIBOR rates and swap rates are obtained from Bloomberg L.P. (“Bloomberg”) every day and build zero coupon curve based on the Bloomberg LIBOR/Swap curve. The discount factor is then calculated from the zero coupon curve. The cap is the sum of all caplets. For each caplet, the rate is reset at the beginning of each reporting period and payments are made at the end of each period. The cash flow of each caplet is then discounted from each payment date.
     Although most of the derivative instruments are fully collateralized, a credit spread is considered for those that are not secured in full. The cumulative mark-to-market effect of credit risk in the valuation of derivative instruments resulted in an unrealized gain of approximately $2.4$0.5 million as of December 31, 2008,2009, of which an unrealized loss of $1.9 million was recorded in 2009, an unrealized gain of $1.5 million was recorded in 2008 and an unrealized gain of $0.9 million was recorded in 2007.
     Certain derivatives with limited market activity, as is the case with derivative instruments named as “reference caps”, are valued using models that consider unobservable market parameters. Refer to Note 1 for additional information about the fair value of derivatives with limited market activity.
Term notes payable
     The fair value of term notes is determined using a discounted cash flow analysis over the full term of the borrowings. This valuation also uses the “Hull-White Interest Rate Tree” approach to value the option components of the term notes. The model assumes that the embedded options are exercised economically. The fair value of medium-term notes is computed using the notional amount outstanding. The discount rates used in the valuations are based on US dollar LIBOR and swap rates. At-the-money implied swaption volatility term structure (volatility by time to maturity) is used to calibrate the model to current market prices and value the cancellation option in the term notes. For the medium-term notes, the credit risk is measured using the difference in yield curves between Swapswap rates and a yield curve that considers the industry and credit rating of the Corporation as issuer of the note at a tenor

F-66


FIRST BANCORP
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
comparable to the time to maturity of the note and option. The net gainloss from fair value changes attributable to the Corporation’s own credit to the medium-term notes for which the Corporation has elected the fair value option amounted to $4.1$3.1 million and $1.6for 2009, compared to an unrealized gain of $4.1 million for 2008 and 2007, respectively.an unrealized gain of $1.6 million for 2007. The cumulative mark-to-market unrealized gain on the medium-term notes since the adoption of SFAS 159measured at fair value attributable to credit risk amounted to $5.7$2.6 million as of December 31, 2008.2009.
Other borrowings
     Other borrowings consist of junior subordinated debentures. The market valueProjected cash flows from the debentures were discounted using the LIBOR yield curve plus a credit spread. This credit spread was based on market prices observedestimated using the difference in yield curves between Swap rates and a yield curve that considers the market.

F-55


FIRST BANCORP
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
industry and credit rating of the Corporation (US Finance BB) as issuer of the note at a tenor comparable to the time to maturity of the debentures.
Note 2830 — Supplemental Cash Flow Information
     Supplemental cash flow information follows:
                        
 Year Ended December 31, Year Ended December 31,
 2008 2007 2006 2009 2008 2007
 (In thousands) (In thousands)
Cash paid for:  
 
Interest on borrowings $687,668 $721,545 $720,439  $494,628 $687,668 $721,545 
Income tax 3,435 10,142 91,779  7,391 3,435 10,142 
  
Non-cash investing and financing activities:  
  
Additions to other real estate owned 61,571 17,108 2,989  98,554 61,571 17,108 
Additions to auto repossessions 87,116 104,728 113,609  80,568 87,116 104,728 
Capitalization of servicing assets 1,559 1,285 1,121  6,072 1,559 1,285 
Loan securitizations 305,378   
Recharacterization of secured commercial loans as securities collateralized by loans  183,830     183,830 
Non-cash acquisition of mortgage loans that previously served as collateral of a commercial loan to a local financial institution 205,395   
     On January 28, 2008, the Corporation completed the acquisition of VICBVirgin Islands Community Bank (“VICB”), with operations in St. Croix, U.S. Virgin Islands, at a purchase price of $2.5 million. The Corporation acquired cash of approximately $7.7 million from VICB.
Note 2931 — Commitments and Contingencies
     The following table presents a detail of commitments to extend credit, standby letters of credit and commitments to sell loans:
                
 December 31, December 31,
 2008 2007 2009 2008
 (In thousands) (In thousands)
Financial instruments whose contract amounts represent credit risk:  
Commitments to extend credit:  
To originate loans $518,281 $455,136  $255,598 $518,281 
Unused credit card lines 22 19   22 
Unused personal lines of credit 50,389 61,731  33,313 50,389 
Commercial lines of credit 863,963 1,109,661  1,187,004 863,963 
Commercial letters of credit 33,632 41,478  48,944 33,632 
  
Standby letters of credit 102,178 112,690  103,904 102,178 
  
Commitments to sell loans 50,500 11,801  13,158 50,500 
     The Corporation’s exposure to credit loss in the event of nonperformance by the other party to the financial instrument on commitments to extend credit and standby letters of credit is represented by the contractual amount of

F-67


FIRST BANCORP
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
those instruments. Management uses the same credit policies and approval process in entering into commitments and conditional obligations as it does for on-balance sheet instruments.
     Commitments to extend credit are agreements to lend to a customer as long as there is no violation of any conditionconditions established in the contract. Commitments generally have fixed expiration dates or other termination clauses. Since certain commitments are expected to expire without being drawn upon, the total commitment amount does not necessarily represent future cash requirements. For most of the commercial lines of credit, the Corporation has the option to reevaluate the agreement prior to additional disbursements. There have been no significant or unexpected draws on existing commitments. The funding needs patterns of the customers have not significantly changed as a result of the latest market disruptions in 2008. In the case of credit cards and personal lines of credit, the Corporation can, at any time and without cause, cancel the unused credit facility. Generally, the Corporation’s mortgage banking activities do not enter into interest rate lock agreements with its prospective borrowers. The amount of any collateral obtained if deemed necessary by the Corporation upon an extension of credit is based on management’s credit evaluation of the borrower. Rates charged on loans that are finally disbursed are the rates being offered at the time the loans are closed; therefore, no fee is charged on these commitments.

F-56


FIRST BANCORP
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
     In general, commercial and standby letters of credit are issued to facilitate foreign and domestic trade transactions. Normally, commercial and standby letters of credit are short-term commitments used to finance commercial contracts for the shipment of goods. The collateral for these letters of credit includes cash or available commercial lines of credit. The fair value of commercial and standby letters of credit is based on the fees currently charged for such agreements, which as,as of December 31, 20082009 and 2007,2008, was not significant.
     In December 2008, theThe Corporation obtained from GNMA, Commitment Authority to issue GNMA mortgage-backed securities for approximately $50.5 million.securities. Under this program, as of December 31, 2009, the Corporation will begin securitizing and sellinghad securitized approximately $305.4 million of FHA/VA mortgage loan production at fair value into the secondary markets.GNMA mortgage-backed securities.
     Lehman Brothers Special Financing, Inc. (“Lehman”) was the counterparty to the Corporation on certain interest rate swap agreements. During the third quarter of 2008, Lehman failed to pay the scheduled net cash settlement due to the Corporation, which constitutes an event of default under thesethose interest rate swap agreements. The Corporation terminated all interest rate swaps with Lehman and replaced them with another counterpartyother counterparties under similar terms and conditions. In connection with the unpaid net cash settlement due as of December 31, 2008,2009 under the swap agreements, the Corporation has an unsecured counterparty exposure with Lehman, which filed for bankruptcy on October 3, 2008, of approximately $1.4 million. This exposure has beenwas reserved asin the third quarter of December 31, 2008. The Corporation had pledged collateral of $63.6 million with Lehman to guarantee its performance under the swap agreements in the event payment thereunder was required. The marketbook value of pledged securities with Lehman as of December 31, 20082009 amounted to approximately $62$64.5 million.
     The position ofCorporation believes that the Corporation with respect to the recovery of the collateral, after discussion with its outside legal counsel, is that at all times title to the collateral has been vested in the Corporation and that, therefore, thissecurities pledged as collateral should not for any purpose, be considered propertypart of the Lehman bankruptcy estate available for distribution amonggiven the fact that the posted collateral constituted a performance guarantee under the swap agreements, was not part of a financing agreement, and ownership of the securities was never transferred to Lehman. Upon termination of the interest rate swap agreements, Lehman’s creditors. On January 30,obligation was to return the collateral to the Corporation. During the fourth quarter of 2009, the Corporation discovered that Lehman Brothers, Inc., acting as agent of Lehman, had deposited the securities in a custodial account at JP Morgan/Chase, and that, shortly before the filing of the Lehman bankruptcy proceedings, it had provided instructions to have most of the securities transferred to Barclay’s Capital in New York. After Barclay’s refusal to turn over the securities, the Corporation, during the month of December 2009, filed a customerlawsuit against Barclay’s Capital in federal court in New York demanding the return of the securities. While the Corporation believes it has valid reasons to support its claim for the return of the securities, there are no assurances that it will ultimately succeed in its litigation against Barclay’s Capital to recover all or a substantial portion of the securities.
     Additionally, the Corporation continues to pursue its claim filed in January 2009 in the proceedings under the Securities Protection Act with regard to Lehman Brothers Incorporated in Bankruptcy Court, Southern District of New York. The Corporation can provide no assurances that it will be successful in recovering all or

F-68


FIRST BANCORP
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
substantial portion of the trustee and at this timesecurities through these proceedings. An estimated loss was not accrued as the Corporation is unable to determine the timing of the claim resolution or whether it will succeed in recovering all or a substantial portion of the collateral or its equivalent value. AsIf additional relevant negative facts become available in future periods, a need to recognize a partial or full reserve of this claim may arise. Considering that the investment securities have not yet been recovered by the Corporation, despite its efforts in this regard, the Corporation decided to classify such investments as non-performing during the second quarter of 2009.
Note 3032 — Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities
     One of the market risks facing the Corporation is interest rate risk, which includes the risk that changes in interest rates will result in changes in the value of the Corporation’s assets or liabilities and the risk that net interest income from its loan and investment portfolios will change in response to changes in interest rates. The overall objective of the Corporation’s interest rate risk management activities is to reduce the variability of earnings caused by changes in interest rates.
     The Corporation uses various financial instruments, including derivatives, to manage the interest rate risk primarily related primarily to the values of its brokered CDsmedium-term notes and medium-term notes.for protection of rising interest rates in connection with private label MBS.
     The Corporation designates a derivative as a fair value hedge, cash flow hedge or as an economic undesignated hedge when it enters into the derivative contract. As of December 31, 20082009 and 2007,2008, all derivatives held by the Corporation were considered economic undesignated hedges. These undesignated hedges are recorded at fair value with the resulting gain or loss recognized in current earnings.
     The following summarizes most of the principal derivative activities used by the Corporation in managing interest rate risk:
Interest rate swaps — Interest rate swap agreements generally involve the exchange of fixed and floating-rate interest payment obligations without the exchange of the underlying notional principal amount. Since a substantial portion of the Corporation’s loans, mainly commercial loans, yield variable rates, interest rate swaps are utilized to convert fixed-rate brokered CDs (liabilities), mainly those with long-term maturities, to a variable rate and mitigate the interest rate risk inherent in these variable rate loans. Similar to unrealized gains and losses arising from changes in fair value, net interest settlements on interest rate swaps are recorded as an adjustment to interest income or interest expense depending on whether an asset or liability is being economically hedged.
Interest rate cap agreements — Interest rate cap agreements provide the right to receive cash if a reference interest rate rises above a contractual rate. The value increases as the reference interest rate rises. The Corporation enters into interest rate cap agreements to protectfor protection against rising interest rates. Specifically, the interest rate on certain private label mortgage pass-through securities and certain of the Corporation’s commercial loans to other financial institutions is generally a variable rate limited to the weighted-average coupon of the pass-through certificate or referenced residential mortgage collateral, less a contractual servicing fee.

F-57


FIRST BANCORP
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTSInterest rate swaps(Continued)
Interest rate swap agreements generally involve the exchange of fixed and floating-rate interest payment obligations without the exchange of the underlying notional principal amount. As of December 31, 2009, most of the interest rate swaps outstanding are used for protection against rising interest rates. In the past, interest rate swaps volume was much higher since they were used to convert fixed-rate brokered CDs (liabilities), mainly those with long-term maturities, to a variable rate and mitigate the interest rate risk inherent in variable rate loans. However, most of these interest rate swaps were called during 2009, in the face of lower interest rate levels, and as a consequence the Corporation exercised its call option on the swapped-to-floating brokered CDs. Similar to unrealized gains and losses arising from changes in fair value, net interest settlements on interest rate swaps are recorded as an adjustment to interest income or interest expense depending on whether an asset or liability is being economically hedged.
Indexed options — Indexed options are generally over-the-counter (OTC) contracts that the Corporation enters into in order to receive the appreciation of a specified Stock Index (e.g., Dow Jones Industrial Composite Stock Index) over a specified period in exchange for a premium paid at the contract’s inception. The option period is determined by the contractual maturity of the notes payable tied to the performance of the Stock Index. The credit risk inherent in these options is the risk that the exchange party may not fulfill its obligation.
     To satisfy the needs of its customers, the Corporation may enter into non-hedging transactions. On these transactions, generally, the Corporation participates as a buyer in one of the agreements and as thea seller in the other agreement under the same terms and conditions.

F-69


FIRST BANCORP
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
     In addition, the Corporation enters into certain contracts with embedded derivatives that do not require separate accounting as these are clearly and closely related to the economic characteristics of the host contract. When the embedded derivative possesses economic characteristics that are not clearly and closely related to the economic characteristics of the host contract, it is bifurcated, carried at fair value, and designated as a trading or non-hedging derivative instrument.
     Effective January 1, 2007, the Corporation adopted SFAS 159 for its callable brokered CDs and a portion of its callable fixed medium-term notes that were hedged with interest rate swaps following fair value hedge accounting under SFAS 133. Interest rate risk on the callable brokered CDs and medium-term notes elected for the fair value option under SFAS 159 continues to be economically hedged with callable interest rate swaps.
The following table summarizes the notional amounts of all derivative instruments as of December 31, 20082009 and December 31, 2007:2008:
         
  Notional Amounts 
  As of  As of 
  December 31,  December 31, 
  2008  2007 
   
  (In thousands) 
Economic undesignated hedges:
        
         
Interest rate contracts:        
Interest rate swap agreements used to hedge fixed-rate brokered CDs, notes payable and loans $1,184,820  $4,244,473 
Written interest rate cap agreements  128,043   128,075 
Purchased interest rate cap agreements  276,400   294,982 
         
Equity contracts:        
Embedded written options on stock index deposits and notes payable  53,515   53,515 
Purchased options used to manage exposure to the stock market on embedded stock index options  53,515   53,515 
       
  $1,696,293  $4,774,560 
       

F-58


FIRST BANCORP
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
         
  Notional Amounts 
  As of  As of 
  December 31,  December 31, 
  2009  2008 
  (In thousands) 
Economic undesignated hedges:
        
         
Interest rate contracts:        
Interest rate swap agreements used to hedge fixed-rate brokered CDs, notes payable and loans $79,567  $1,184,820 
Written interest rate cap agreements  102,521   128,043 
Purchased interest rate cap agreements  228,384   276,400 
         
Equity contracts:        
Embedded written options on stock index deposits and notes payable  53,515   53,515 
Purchased options used to manage exposure to the stock market on embedded stock index options  53,515   53,515 
       
  $517,502  $1,696,293 
       
     The following table summarizes the fair value of derivative instruments and the location in the Statement of Financial Condition as of December 31, 20082009 and 2007:2008:
                                           
 Asset Derivatives Liability Derivatives  Asset Derivatives Liability Derivatives 
 As of December 31, As of December 31,  As of December 31, As of December 31,
 Statement of 2008 2007 Statement of 2008 2007  Statement of 2009 2008 Statement of 2009 2008 
 Financial Condition Fair Fair Financial Condition Fair Fair  Financial Condition Fair Fair Financial Condition Fair Fair 
 Location Value Value Location Value Value  Location Value Value Location Value Value 
 (In thousands)  (In thousands) 
Economic undesignated hedges:
      
      
Interest rate contracts:      
Interest rate swap agreements used to hedge fixed-rate brokered CDs, notes payable and loans Other assets $5,649 $213 Accounts payable and other liabilities $7,188 $58,057  Other assets $319 $5,649 Accounts payable and other liabilities $5,068 $7,188 
Written interest rate cap agreements Other assets   Accounts payable and other liabilities 3 47  Other assets   Accounts payable and other liabilities 201 3 
Purchased interest rate cap agreements Other assets 764 5,149 Accounts payable and other liabilities    Other assets 4,423 764 Accounts payable and other liabilities   
      
Equity contracts:      
Embedded written options on stock index deposits Other assets   Interest-bearing deposits 241 4,375  Other assets   Interest-bearing deposits 14 241 
Embedded written options on stock index notes payable Other assets   Notes payable 1,073 4,673  Other assets   Notes payable 1,184 1,073 
Purchased options used to manage exposure to the stock market on embedded stock index options Other assets 1,597 9,339 Accounts payable and other liabilities    Other assets 1,194 1,597 Accounts payable and other liabilities   
                      
 $8,010 $14,701 $8,505 $67,152    $5,936 $8,010   $6,467 $8,505 
                      

F-59F-70


FIRST BANCORP
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
     The following table summarizes the effect of derivative instruments on the Statement of Income for the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 2007 and 2006:2007:
                            
 Unrealized Gain or (Loss)  Gain or (Loss) 
 Location of Unrealized Gain or (Loss) Year Ended December 31,  Location of Gain or (Loss) Year Ended December 31, 
 Recognized in Income on Derivatives 2008 2007 2006  Recognized in Income on Derivatives 2009 2008 2007 
 (In thousands)  (In thousands) 
ECONOMIC UNDESIGNATED HEDGES:
      
Interest rate contracts:      
Interest rate swap agreements used to hedge fixed-rate:      
Brokered CDs Interest expense — Deposits $63,132 $66,617 $(62,521) Interest expense - Deposits $(5,236) $63,132 $66,617 
Notes payable Interest expense — Notes payable and other borrowings 124 1,440  (4,083) Interest expense - Notes payable and other borrowings 3 124 1,440 
Loans Interest income — Loans  (3,696)  (2,653) 520  Interest income - Loans 2,023  (3,696)  (2,653)
Corporate bonds Interest income — Investment Securities   27 
      
Written and purchased interest rate cap agreements — mortgage-backed securities Interest income — Investment Securities  (4,283)  (3,546)  
Written and purchased interest rate cap agreements — loans Interest income — Loans  (58)  (439)  (472)
Written and purchased interest rate cap agreements - - mortgage-backed securities Interest income - Investment securities 3,394  (4,283)  (3,546)
Written and purchased interest rate cap agreements - - loans Interest income - loans 102  (58)  (439)
Equity contracts:      
Embedded written and purchased options on stock index deposits Interest expense — Deposits  (276) 209   Interest expense - Deposits  (85)  (276) 209 
Embedded written and purchased options on stock index notes payable Interest expense — Notes payable and other borrowings 268  (71)   Interest expense - Notes payable and other borrowings  (202) 268  (71)
                 
Total (loss) gain on derivatives   $(1) $55,211 $61,557 
   55,211 61,557  (66,529)        
         
   
DERIVATIVES IN FAIR VALUE HEDGE RELATIONSHIP:
   
Interest rate contracts:   
Interest rate swap agreements used to hedge fixed-rate (1):   
Brokered CDs Interest expense — Deposits   7,565 
Notes payable Interest expense — Notes payable and other borrowings   770 
         
     8,335 
         
Total Unrealized Gain (Loss) on Derivatives   $55,211 $61,557 $(58,194)
         
(1)For 2006, represents the ineffective portion resulting from the gain or loss on derivatives offset by the gain or loss on the hedged liability plus the accretion of the basis adjustment of fair value hedges.
     Derivative instruments, such as interest rate swaps, are subject to market risk. The Corporation’s derivatives are mainly composed of interest rate swaps that are used to convert the fixed interest payment on its brokered CDs and medium-term notes to variable payments (receive fixed/pay floating). As is the case with investment securities, the market value of derivative instruments is largely a function of the financial market’s expectations regarding the future direction of interest rates. Accordingly, current market values are not necessarily indicative of the future impact of derivative instruments on earnings. This will depend, for the most part, on the shape of the yield curve, the level of interest rates, as well as the level of interest rates.expectations for rates in the future. The unrealized gains and losses in the fair value of derivatives that economically hedge certain callable brokered CDs and medium-term notes (economically or under a fair value hedge relationship for 2006) are partially offset by unrealized gains and losses on the valuation of such economically hedged liabilities.liabilities measured at fair value. The Corporation includes the gain or loss on those economically hedged liabilities (brokered CDs and medium-term notes) in the same line item as the offsetting loss or gain on the related derivatives as set forth below:
                                     
 Year ended December 31, Year ended December 31,
 2008 2007 2009 2008
 Gain (Loss) Gain Net Unrealized Gain (Loss) Gain Net Unrealized Loss Gain (Loss) Net Gain (Loss) Gain Net
(In thousands) on Derivatives on SFAS 159 liabilities Gain on Derivatives on SFAS 159 liabilities (Loss) / Gain on Derivatives on liabilities measured at fair value Gain (Loss) on Derivatives on liabilities measured at fair value Gain
Interest expense — Deposits $62,856 $(54,199) $8,657 $66,826 $(71,116) $(4,290) $(5,321) $8,696 $3,375 $62,856 $(54,199) $8,657 
Interest expense — Notes payable and other borrowings 392 4,165 4,557 1,369 494 1,863 
Interest expense — Notes payable and Other Borrowings  (199)  (3,221)  (3,420) 392 4,165 4,557 
     From April 3, 2006 to January 1, 2007, the implementation dateA summary of SFAS 159, the Corporation followed the long-haul method of accounting under SFAS 133 for its portfolio of callable interest rate swaps callable brokered CDsas of December 31, 2009 and callable notes. The long-haul method requires periodic assessment of hedge effectiveness and measurement of ineffectiveness. The ineffectiveness results to the extent that changes in the fair value of a derivative do not offset changes in the fair value of the hedged item. For derivative instruments that were designated and qualified as a fair value hedge in 2006, the gain or loss on the derivative as well as the offsetting loss or gain on the hedged item attributable to the hedged risk were recognized in current earnings. The Corporation included the gain or loss on the2008 follows:
         
  As of As of
  December 31, December 31,
  2009 2008
  (Dollars in thousands)
Pay fixed/receive floating :        
Notional amount $79,567  $81,575 
Weighted-average receive rate at period end  2.15%  3.21%
Weighted-average pay rate at period end  6.52%  6.75%
Floating rates range from 167 to 252 basis points over 3-month LIBOR        
         
Receive fixed/pay floating (generally used to economically hedge fixed-rate brokered CDs and notes payable):        
Notional amount $  $1,103,244 
Weighted-average receive rate at period end  0.00%  5.30%
Weighted-average pay rate at period end  0.00%  3.09%

F-60F-71


FIRST BANCORP
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
hedged item (callable brokered CDs and medium-term notes) in the same line item as the offsetting loss or gain on the related interest rate swaps as follows:
             
      Unrealized Loss  
  Unrealized Gain on hedged Ineffective
             Income Statement Classification on Snaps liabilities Portion – gain
Interest expense — Deposits $78,896  $(74,907) $3,989 
Interest expense -Notes payable and other borrowings  3,179   (2,459)  720 
     Prior to the implementation of the long-haul method, First BanCorp reflected changes in the fair value of those swaps as well as swaps related to certain loans as non-hedging instruments through operations as part of net interest income.
     A summary of interest rate swaps as of December 31, 2008 and 2007 follows:
         
  As of As of
  December 31, December 31,
  2008 2007
  (Dollars in thousands)
Pay fixed/receive floating (generally used to economically hedge variable rate loans):        
Notional amount $78,855  $80,212 
Weighted-average receive rate at period end  3.21%  7.09%
Weighted-average pay rate at period end  6.75%  6.75%
Floating rates range from 167 to 252 basis points over 3-month LIBOR        
         
Receive fixed/pay floating (generally used to economically hedge fixed-rate brokered CDs and notes payable):        
Notional amount $1,105,965  $4,164,261 
Weighted-average receive rate at period end  5.30%  5.26%
Weighted-average pay rate at period end  3.09%  5.07%
Floating rates range from 2 basis points to 54 basis points over 3-month LIBOR        
The changes in notional amount of interest rate swaps outstanding during the years ended December 31, 20082009 and 20072008 follows:
     
  Notional Amount 
  (In thousands) 
Pay-fixed and receive-floating swaps:    
Balance as of December 31, 2006
 $80,720 
Cancelled and matured contracts  (508)
New contracts   
    
Balance as of December 31, 2007
  80,212 
Cancelled and matured contracts  (1,357)
New contracts   
    
Balance as of December 31, 2008
 $78,855 
    
     
Receive-fixed and pay floating swaps:    
Balance as of December 31, 2006
 $4,802,370 
Cancelled and matured contracts  (638,109)
New contracts   
    
Balance as of December 31, 2007
  4,164,261 
Cancelled and matured contracts  (3,426,519)
New contracts  368,222 
    
Balance as of December 31, 2008
 $1,105,964 
    

F-61


FIRST BANCORP
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
     
  Notional Amount 
  (In thousands) 
Pay-fixed and receive-floating swaps:    
Balance as of December 31, 2007
 $82,932 
Cancelled and matured contracts  (1,357)
New contracts   
    
Balance as of December 31, 2008
  81,575 
Cancelled and matured contracts  (2,008)
New contracts   
    
Balance as of December 31, 2009
 $79,567 
    
     
Receive-fixed and pay floating swaps:    
Balance as of December 31, 2007
 $4,161,541 
Cancelled and matured contracts  (3,426,519)
New contracts  368,222 
    
Balance as of December 31, 2008
  1,103,244 
Cancelled and matured contracts  (1,103,244)
New contracts   
    
Balance as of December 31, 2009
 $ 
    
     During 2008, approximately $3.0the first half of 2009, all of the $1.1 billion of interest rate swaps that economically hedged brokered CDs that were outstanding as of December 31, 2008 were called by the counterparties, mainly due to lower levels of 3-month LIBOR. Following the cancellation of the interest rate swaps, the Corporation exercised its call option on the approximately $2.9$1.1 billion swapped-to-floating brokered CDs. The Corporation recorded a net gain in earningsloss of $4.1$3.5 million as a result of these transactions resulting from the reversal of the cumulative mark-to-market valuation of the swaps and the brokered CDs called.
     As of December 31, 2008,2009, the Corporation has not entered into any derivative instrument containing credit-risk-related contingent features.
     Credit and Market Risk of Derivatives
     The Corporation uses derivative instruments to manage interest rate risk. By using derivative instruments, the Corporation is exposed to credit and market risk. If the counterparty fails to perform, credit risk is equal to the extent of the Corporation’s fair value gain in the derivative. When the fair value of a derivative instrument contract is positive, this generally indicates that the counterparty owes the Corporation and, therefore, creates a credit risk for the Corporation. When the fair value of a derivative instrument contract is negative, the Corporation owes the counterparty and, therefore, it has no credit risk. The Corporation minimizes the credit risk in derivative instruments by entering into transactions with reputable broker dealers (financial institutions) that are reviewed periodically by the Corporation’s Management’s Investment and Asset Liability Committee (MIALCO) and by the Board of Directors. The Corporation also maintains a policy of requiring that all derivative instrument contracts be governed by an International Swaps and Derivatives Association Master Agreement, which includes a provision for netting; most of the Corporation’s agreements with derivative counterparties include bilateral collateral arrangements. The bilateral collateral arrangement permits the counterparties to perform margin calls in the form of cash or securities in the event that the fair market value of the derivative favors either counterparty. The book value and aggregate market value of securities pledged as collateral for interest rate swaps as of December 31, 2008 was $52.5 million and $54.2 million, respectively (2008 — $93.2 million and $91.7 million, respectively (2007 — $255 million and $253 million, respectively). The Corporation has a policy of diversifying derivatives counterparties to reduce the risk that any counterparty will default.
     The Corporation has credit risk of $8.0$5.9 million (2007(2008$14.7$8.0 million) related to derivative instruments with positive fair values. The credit risk does not consider the value of any collateral and the effects of legally enforceable master netting agreements. There was a loss of approximately $1.4 million, related to a counterparty that failed to pay a scheduled net cash settlement in 2008 (refer to Note 3231 for additional information). There were no credit losses associated with derivative instruments classified as designated hedges or undesignated economic hedges recognized in 20072009 or 2006.2007. As of December 31, 2008,2009, the Corporation had a total net interest settlement payable of $0.3 million (2008 — net interest settlement receivable of $4.1 million (2007 — $8.4 million) related to the swap transactions. The net settlements receivable and net settlements payable on interest

F-72


FIRST BANCORP
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
rate swaps are included as part of “Other Assets” and “Accounts payable and other liabilities”, respectively, on the Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition.
     Market risk is the adverse effect that a change in interest rates or implied volatility rates has on the value of a financial instrument. The Corporation manages the market risk associated with interest rate contracts by establishing and monitoring limits as to the types and degree of risk that may be undertaken.
     The Corporation’s derivative activities are monitored by the MIALCO as part of its risk-management oversight of the Corporation’s treasury functions.

F-62


FIRST BANCORP
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
Note 3133 — Segment Information
     Based upon the Corporation’s organizational structure and the information provided to the Chief Operating Decision MakerExecutive Officer of the Corporation and, to a lesser extent, the Board of Directors, the operating segments are driven primarily by the Corporation’s legal entities.lines of business for its operations in Puerto Rico, the Corporation’s principal market, and by geographic areas for its operations outside of Puerto Rico. As of December 31, 2008,2009, the Corporation had foursix reportable segments: Commercial and Corporate Banking; Mortgage Banking; Consumer (Retail) Banking; and Treasury and Investments. There is also an Other category reflecting other legal entities reported separately on aggregate basis.Investments; United States operations and Virgin Islands operations. Management determined the reportable segments based on the internal reporting used to evaluate performance and to assess where to allocate resources. Other factors such as the Corporation’s organizational chart, nature of the products, distribution channels and the economic characteristics of the products were also considered in the determination of the reportable segments.
     Starting in the fourth quarter of 2009, the Corporation has realigned its reporting segments to better reflect how it views and manages its business. Two additional operating segments were created to evaluate the operations conducted by the Corporation, outside of Puerto Rico. Operations conducted in the United States and in the Virgin Islands are now individually evaluated as separate operating segments. This realignment in the segment reporting essentially reflects the effect of restructuring initiatives, including the merger of FirstBank Florida operations with and into FirstBank, and will allow the Corporation to better present the results from its growth focus. Prior to the third quarter of 2009, the operating segments were driven primarily by the Corporation’s legal entities. FirstBank operations conducted in the Virgin Islands and through its loan production office in Miami, Florida were reflected in the Corporation’s then four reportable segments (Commercial and Corporate Banking; Mortgage Banking; Consumer (Retail) Banking; Treasury and Investments) while the operations conducted by FirstBank Florida were reported as part of a category named “Other”. In the third quarter of 2009, as a result of the aforementioned merger, the operations of FirstBank Florida were reported as part of the four reportable segments. The change in the fourth quarter reflected a further realignment of the organizational structure as a result of management changes. Prior period amounts have been reclassified to conform to current period presentation. These changes did not have an impact on the previously reported consolidated results of the Corporation.
The Commercial and Corporate Banking segment consists of the Corporation’s lending and other services for large customers represented by the public sector and specialized and middle-market clients.clients and the public sector. The Commercial and Corporate Banking segment offers commercial loans, including commercial real estate and construction loans, and other products such as cash management and business management services. The Mortgage Banking segment’s operations consist of the origination, sale and servicing of a variety of residential mortgage loans. The Mortgage Banking segment also acquires and sells mortgages in the secondary markets. In addition, the Mortgage Banking segment includes mortgage loans purchased from other local banks orand mortgage brokers.bankers. The Consumer (Retail) Banking segment consists of the Corporation’s consumer lending and deposit-taking activities conducted mainly through its branch network and loan centers. The Treasury and InvestmentInvestments segment is responsible for the Corporation’s investment portfolio and treasury functions executed to manage and enhance liquidity. This segment loanslends funds to the Commercial and Corporate Banking, Mortgage Banking and Consumer (Retail) Banking segments to finance their lending activities and borrows from those segments. The Consumer (Retail) Banking segment also loanslends funds to other segments. The interest rates charged or credited by Treasury and Investments and the Consumer (Retail) Banking segments are allocated based on market rates. The difference between the allocated interest income or expense and the Corporation’s actual net interest income from centralized management of funding costs is reported in the Treasury and Investments segment. The Other category is mainly composedUnited States operations segment consists of all banking activities conducted by FirstBank in the United States mainland, including commercial and retail banking

F-73


FIRST BANCORP
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
services. The Virgin Islands operations segment consists of all banking activities conducted by the Corporation in the U.S. and British Virgin Islands, including commercial and retail banking services and insurance finance leases and other products.activities.
     The accounting policies of the segments are the same as those described in Note 1 — “Nature of Business and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies”.
     The Corporation evaluates the performance of the segments based on net interest income, after the estimated provision for loan and lease losses, non-interest income and direct non-interest expenses. The segments are also evaluated based on the average volume of their interest-earning assets less the allowance for loan and lease losses.

F-63


FIRST BANCORP
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
     The following table presents information about the reportable segments (in thousands):
                         
  Mortgage  Consumer  Commercial and  Treasury and       
  Banking  (Retail) Banking  Corporate  Investments  Other  Total 
For the year ended December 31, 2008:
                        
Interest income $188,385  $172,082  $348,469  $288,585  $129,376  $1,126,897 
Net (charge) credit for transfer of funds  (141,174)  77,952   (211,526)  285,820   (11,072)   
Interest expense     (77,060)     (487,211)  (34,745)  (599,016)
                   
Net interest income  47,211   172,974   136,943   87,194   83,559   527,881 
                   
Provision for loan and lease losses  (9,849)  (51,317)  (78,826)     (50,956)  (190,948)
Non-interest income  3,439   28,843   4,648   25,771   11,942   74,643 
Direct non-interest expenses  (23,883)  (103,790)  (41,599)  (6,713)  (44,524)  (220,509)
                   
Segment income $16,918  $46,710  $21,166  $106,252  $21  $191,067 
                   
                         
Average earnings assets $2,942,444  $1,812,438  $6,089,807  $5,583,681  $1,377,522  $17,805,892 
                         
For the year ended December 31, 2007:
                        
Interest income $165,159  $184,353  $425,109  $284,165  $130,461  $1,189,247 
Net (charge) credit for transfer of funds  (126,145)  101,391   (289,201)  336,150   (22,195)   
Interest expense     (80,404)     (624,840)  (32,987)  (738,231)
                   
Net interest income (loss)  39,014   205,340   135,908   (4,525)  75,279   451,016 
                   
Provision for loan and lease losses  (1,645)  (55,633)  (41,176)     (22,156)  (120,610)
Non-interest income (loss)  3,019   27,314   3,778   (2,161)  17,634   49,584 
Net gain on partial extinguishment and recharacterization of secured commercial loans to a local financial institution        2,497         2,497 
Direct non-interest expenses  (21,816)  (94,122)  (23,161)  (7,842)  (45,409)  (192,350)
                   
Segment income (loss) $18,572  $82,899  $77,846  $(14,528) $25,348  $190,137 
                   
                         
Average earnings assets $2,558,779  $1,824,661  $5,471,097  $5,401,148  $1,312,669  $16,568,354 
                                                    
 Mortgage Consumer Commercial and Treasury and      Mortgage Consumer Commercial and Treasury and United States Virgin Islands   
(In thousands) Banking (Retail) Banking Corporate Investments Operations Operations Total 
For the year ended December 31, 2009:
 
Interest income $156,729 $210,102 $239,399 $251,949 $67,936 $70,459 $996,574 
Net (charge) credit for transfer of funds  (117,486) 205  (59,080) 176,361    
Interest expense   (60,661)   (342,161)  (65,360)  (9,350)  (477,532)
 Banking (Retail) Banking Corporate Investments Other Total                
For the year ended December 31, 2006:
 
Net interest income 39,243 149,646 180,319 86,149 2,576 61,109 519,042 
               
Provision for loan and lease losses  (29,717)  (62,457)  (273,822)   (188,651)  (25,211)  (579,858)
Non-interest income 8,497 32,003 5,695 84,369 1,460 10,240 142,264 
Direct non-interest expenses  (32,314)  (98,263)  (41,948)  (7,416)  (37,704)  (45,364)  (263,009)
               
Segment (loss) income $(14,291) $20,929 $(129,756) $163,102 $(222,319) $774 $(181,561)
               
 
Average earnings assets $2,654,504 $2,109,602 $5,974,950 $5,831,078 $1,449,878 $996,508 $19,016,520 
 
For the year ended December 31, 2008:
 
Interest income $156,577 $225,474 $287,708 $288,063 $95,043 $74,032 $1,126,897 
Net (charge) credit for transfer of funds  (119,257) 3,573  (175,454) 291,138    
Interest expense   (63,001)   (455,802)  (66,204)  (14,009)  (599,016)
               
Net interest income 37,320 166,046 112,254 123,399 28,839 60,023 527,881 
Provision for loan and lease losses  (8,997)  (80,506)  (35,504)   (53,406)  (12,535)  (190,948)
Non-interest income (loss) 2,667 35,531 4,591 25,577  (3,570) 9,847 74,643 
Direct non-interest expenses  (22,703)  (99,232)  (24,467)  (6,713)  (34,236)  (48,105)  (235,456)
               
Segment income (loss) $8,287 $21,839 $56,874 $142,263 $(62,373) $9,230 $176,120 
               
 
Average earnings assets $2,492,566 $2,185,888 $5,086,787 $5,583,181 $1,515,418 $942,052 $17,805,892 
 
For the year ended December 31, 2007:
 
Interest income $148,811 $201,609 $472,179 $350,038 $116,176 $1,288,813  $133,068 $238,874 $335,625 $284,155 $121,897 $75,628 $1,189,247 
Net (charge) credit for transfer of funds  (105,431) 108,979  (317,446) 334,149  (20,251)    (105,459)  (794)  (230,777) 370,451  (33,421)   
Interest expense   (72,128)   (747,402)  (25,589)  (845,119)   (63,807)   (608,119)  (49,734)  (16,571)  (738,231)
                            
Net interest income 43,380 238,460 154,733  (63,215) 70,336 443,694  27,609 174,273 104,848 46,487 38,742 59,057 451,016 
                            
Provision for loan and lease losses  (3,988)  (35,482)  (7,936)   (27,585)  (74,991)  (1,643)  (73,799)  (12,465)   (30,174)  (2,529)  (120,610)
Non-interest income (loss) 2,471 23,543 4,590  (8,313) 19,685 41,976  2,124 32,529 3,737  (2,161) 1,167 12,188 49,584 
Net gain on partial extinguishment of secured commercial loans to a local financial institution    (10,640)    (10,640)
Net gain on partial extinguishment and recharacterization of secured commercial loans to a local financial institution   2,497    2,497 
Direct non-interest expenses  (17,450)  (86,905)  (16,917)  (7,677)  (43,890)  (172,839)  (20,890)  (95,169)  (20,056)  (7,842)  (21,848)  (42,407)  (208,212)
                            
Segment income (loss) $24,413 $139,616 $123,830 $(79,205) $18,546 $227,200  $7,200 $37,834 $78,561 $36,484 $(12,113) $26,309 $174,275 
                            
 
Average earnings assets $2,283,683 $1,919,083 $6,298,326 $6,787,581 $1,156,712 $18,445,385  $2,140,647 $2,207,447 $4,363,149 $5,400,648 $1,561,029 $895,434 $16,568,354 

F-64F-74


FIRST BANCORP
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
     The following table presents a reconciliation of the reportable segment financial information to the consolidated totals:
                        
 Year Ended December 31,  Year Ended December 31, 
 2008 2007 2006  2009 2008 2007 
 (In thousands)  (In thousands) 
Net income:
 
Total income for segments and other $191,067 $190,137 $227,200 
Net (loss) income:
 
Total (loss) income for segments and other $(181,561) $176,120 $174,275 
Other Income  15,075     15,075 
Other operating expenses  (112,862)  (115,493)  (115,124)  (89,092)  (97,915)  (99,631)
              
Income before income taxes 78,205 89,719 112,076   (270,653) 78,205 89,719 
Income tax benefit (expense) 31,732  (21,583)  (27,442)
Income tax (expense) benefit  (4,534) 31,732  (21,583)
              
Total consolidated net income $109,937 $68,136 $84,634 
Total consolidated net (loss) income $(275,187) $109,937 $68,136 
              
  
Average assets:
  
Total average earning assets for segments $17,805,892 $16,568,354 $18,445,385  $19,016,520 $17,805,892 $16,568,354 
Average non-earning assets 702,064 645,853 737,526  790,702 702,064 645,853 
              
Total consolidated average assets $18,507,956 $17,214,207 $19,182,911  $19,807,222 $18,507,956 $17,214,207 
              
     The following table presents revenues and selected balance sheet data by geography based on the location in which the transaction is originated:
                        
 2008 2007 2006  2009 2008 2007 
 (In thousands)  (In thousands) 
Revenues:
  
Puerto Rico $1,026,188 $1,045,523 $1,107,451 
Puerto Rico(1)
 $988,743 $1,026,188 $1,045,523 
United States 91,473 123,064 133,083  69,396 91,473 123,064 
Other 83,879 87,816 79,615 
Virgin Islands 80,699 83,879 87,816 
              
Total consolidated revenues $1,201,540 $1,256,403 $1,320,149  $1,138,838 $1,201,540 $1,256,403 
              
  
Selected Balance Sheet Information:
  
Total assets:  
Puerto Rico $16,824,168 $14,633,217 $14,688,754  $16,843,767 $16,824,168 $14,633,217 
United States 1,619,280 1,540,808 1,742,243  1,716,694 1,619,280 1,540,808 
Other 1,047,820 1,012,906 959,259 
Virgin Islands 1,067,987 1,047,820 1,012,906 
  
Loans:  
Puerto Rico $10,601,488 $9,413,118 $8,777,267  $11,614,866 $10,601,488 $9,413,118 
United States 1,484,011 1,448,613 1,594,141  1,275,869 1,484,011 1,448,613 
Other 1,002,793 938,015 892,572 
Virgin Islands 1,058,491 1,002,793 938,015 
  
Deposits:  
Puerto Rico(1)
 $11,423,019 $9,484,103 $9,318,931 
Puerto Rico $10,497,646 $10,746,688 $8,776,874 
United States 567,423 532,684 580,917  1,252,977 1,243,754 1,239,913 
Other 1,066,988 1,017,734 1,104,439 
Virgin Islands 918,424 1,066,988 1,017,734 
 
(1) Includes brokered certificatesFor 2007, Revenues of deposit used to fund activities conducted in Puerto Rico andoperations include $15.1 million related to reimbursement of expenses, mainly from insurance carriers, related to a class action lawsuit settled in the United States.2007.

F-65F-75


FIRST BANCORP
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
Note 3234 — Litigations
     As of December 31, 2008,2009, First BanCorp and its subsidiaries were defendants in various legal proceedings arising in the ordinary course of business. Management believes that the final disposition of these matters will not have a material adverse effect on the Corporation’s financial position or results of operations.
Note 3335 — First BanCorp (Holding Company Only) Financial Information
     The following condensed financial information presents the financial position of the Holding Company only as of December 31, 20082009 and 2007,2008, and the results of its operations and cash flows for the years ended on December 31, 2009, 2008 2007 and 2006.2007.
Statements of Financial Condition
                
 As of December 31,  As of December 31, 
 2008 2007  2009 2008 
 (In thousands)  (In thousands) 
Assets
  
Cash and due from banks $58,075 $43,519  $55,423 $58,075 
Money market instruments 300 46,293 
Money market investments 300 300 
Investment securities available for sale, at market:  
Mortgage-backed securities  41,234 
Equity investments 669 2,117  303 669 
Other investment securities 1,550 1,550  1,550 1,550 
Loans receivable, net  2,597 
Investment in FirstBank Puerto Rico, at equity 1,574,940 1,457,899 
Investment in FirstBank Insurance Agency, at equity 5,640 4,632 
Investment in First Bank Puerto Rico, at equity 1,754,217 1,574,940 
Investment in First Bank Insurance Agency, at equity 6,709 5,640 
Investment in Ponce General Corporation, at equity 123,367 106,120   123,367 
Investment in PR Finance, at equity 2,789 2,979  3,036 2,789 
Accrued interest receivable  376 
Investment in FBP Statutory Trust I 3,093 3,093  3,093 3,093 
Investment in FBP Statutory Trust II 3,866 3,866  3,866 3,866 
Other assets 6,596 1,503  3,194 6,596 
          
Total assets $1,780,885 $1,717,778  $1,831,691 $1,780,885 
          
  
Liabilities & Stockholders’ Equity
  
Liabilities:  
Other borrowings $231,914 $282,567  $231,959 $231,914 
Accounts payable and other liabilities 854 13,565  669 854 
          
Total liabilities 232,768 296,132  232,628 232,768 
          
 
Stockholders’ equity 1,548,117 1,421,646  1,599,063 1,548,117 
          
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity $1,780,885 $1,717,778  $1,831,691 $1,780,885 
          

F-66F-76


FIRST BANCORP
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
Statements of (Loss) Income
                        
 Year Ended December 31,  Year Ended December 31, 
 2008 2007 2006  2009 2008 2007 
 (In thousands)  (In thousands) 
Income:
  
Interest income on investment securities $727 $3,029 $349  $ $727 $3,029 
Interest income on other investments 1,144 1,289 175  38 1,144 1,289 
Interest income on loans  631 3,987    631 
Dividend from FirstBank Puerto Rico 81,852 79,135 107,302 
Dividend from First Bank Puerto Rico 46,562 81,852 79,135 
Dividend from other subsidiaries 4,000 1,000 14,500  1,000 4,000 1,000 
Other income 408 565 543  496 408 565 
              
 88,131 85,649 126,856  48,096 88,131 85,649 
              
  
Expense:
  
Notes payable and other borrowings 13,947 18,942 18,189  8,315 13,947 18,942 
Interest on funding to subsidiaries 550 3,319 4,186   550 3,319 
(Recovery) provision for loan losses  (1,398) 1,300  (71)   (1,398) 1,300 
Other operating expenses 1,961 2,844 5,390  2,698 1,961 2,844 
              
 15,060 26,405 27,694  11,013 15,060 26,405 
              
  
Net loss on investments and impairments  (1,824)  (6,643)  (12,525)  (388)  (1,824)  (6,643)
              
  
Net loss on partial extinguishment and recharacterization of secured commercial loans to a local financial institution   (1,207)      (1,207)
              
  
Income before income taxes and equity in undistributed earnings (losses) of subsidiaries
 71,247 51,394 86,637 
Income before income taxes and equity in undistributed (losses) earnings of subsidiaries
 36,695 71,247 51,394 
  �� 
Income tax (provision) benefit  (543)  (1,714) 1,381 
 
Equity in undistributed earnings (losses) of subsidiaries
 39,233 18,456  (3,384)
Income tax provision  (6)  (543)  (1,714)
Equity in undistributed (losses) earnings of subsidiaries
  (311,876) 39,233 18,456 
              
  
Net income
 109,937 68,136 84,634 
Net (loss) income
  (275,187) 109,937 68,136 
              
  
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax 82,653 4,903  (14,492)
Other comprehensive (loss) income, net of tax  (30,896) 82,653 4,903 
              
Comprehensive income $192,590 $73,039 $70,142 
Comprehensive (loss) income $(306,083) $192,590 $73,039 
              

F-67F-77


FIRST BANCORP
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
Statements of Cash Flows
                        
 Year Ended December 31,  Year Ended December 31, 
 2008 2007 2006  2009 2008 2007 
 (In thousands)  (In thousands) 
Cash flows from operating activities:  
Net Income $109,937 $68,136 $84,634 
Net (loss) income $(275,187) $109,937 $68,136 
              
  
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities: 
Adjustments to reconcile net (loss) income to net cash provided by operating activities: 
(Recovery) provision for loan losses  (1,398) 1,300  (71)   (1,398) 1,300 
Deferred income tax provision (benefit) 543 1,714  (2,572)
Deferred income tax provision 3 543 1,714 
Stock-based compensation recognized 7    71 7  
Equity in undistributed (earnings) losses of subsidiaries  (39,233)  (18,456) 3,384 
Net loss (gain) on sale of investment securities  733  (2,726)
Equity in undistributed losses (earnings) of subsidiaries 311,876  (39,233)  (18,456)
Net loss on sale of investment securities   733 
Loss on impairment of investment securities 1,824 5,910 15,251  388 1,824 5,910 
Net loss on partial extinguishment and recharacterization of secured commercial loans to a local financial institution  1,207     1,207 
Accretion of discount on investment securities  (33)  (197)     (33)  (197)
Net (increase) decrease in other assets  (3,542) 52,515  (52,372)
Net increase (decrease) in other liabilities 245  (72,639) 2,544 
Net decrease (increase) in other assets 3,399  (3,542) 52,515 
Net (decrease) increase in other liabilities  (144) 245  (72,639)
              
Total adjustments  (41,587)  (27,913)  (36,562) 315,593  (41,587)  (27,913)
              
  
Net cash provided by operating activities 68,350 40,223 48,072  40,406 68,350 40,223 
              
  
Cash flows from investing activities:  
Capital contribution to subsidiaries  (37,786)     (400,000)  (37,786)  
Principal collected on loans 3,995 1,622 9,824   3,995 1,622 
Purchases of securities available for sale    (460)    
Sales, principal repayments and maturity of available-for-sale and held-to-maturity securities 1,582 11,403 5,461   1,582 11,403 
Other investing activities  437     437 
              
Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities  (32,209) 13,462 14,825   (400,000)  (32,209) 13,462 
              
  
Cash flows from financing activities:  
Proceeds from purchased funds and other short-term borrowings   123,247     
Repayments of purchased funds and other short-term borrowings  (1,450)  (5,800)  (130,522)   (1,450)  (5,800)
Issuance of common stock  91,924     91,924 
Exercise of stock options 53  19,756   53  
Issuance of preferred stock 400,000   
Cash dividends paid  (66,181)  (64,881)  (63,566)  (43,066)  (66,181)  (64,881)
Other financing activities 8   
              
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities  (67,578) 21,243  (51,085)
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities 356,942  (67,578) 21,243 
              
  
Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents  (31,437) 74,928 11,812   (2,652)  (31,437) 74,928 
  
Cash and cash equivalents at the beginning of the year 89,812 14,884 3,072  58,375 89,812 14,884 
              
Cash and cash equivalents at the end of the year $58,375 $89,812 $14,884  $55,723 $58,375 $89,812 
              
  
Cash and cash equivalents include:  
Cash and due from banks 58,075 43,519 14,584 
Money market instruments 300 46,293 300 
Cash and due form banks 55,423 58,075 43,519 
Money market investments 300 300 46,293 
              
 $58,375 $89,812 $14,884  $55,723 $58,375 $89,812 
              

F-68F-78


FIRST BANCORP
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
Note 34 — Subsequent Events
     On January 16, 2009, the Corporation entered into a Letter Agreement with the United States Department of the Treasury (“Treasury”) pursuant to which Treasury invested $400,000,000 in preferred stock of the Corporation under the Treasury’s Troubled Asset Relief Program Capital Purchase Program. Under the Letter Agreement, which incorporates the Securities Purchase Agreement — Standard Terms (the “Purchase Agreement”), the Corporation issued and sold to Treasury (1) 400,000 shares of the Corporation’s Fixed Rate Cumulative Perpetual Preferred Stock, Series F, $1,000 liquidation preference per share (the “Series F Preferred Stock”), and (2) a warrant dated January 16, 2009 (the “Warrant”) to purchase 5,842,259 shares of the Corporation’s common stock (the “Warrant shares”) at an exercise price of $10.27 per share. The exercise price of the Warrant was determined based upon the average of the closing prices of the Corporation’s common stock during the 20-trading day period ended December 19, 2008, the last trading day prior to the date the Corporation’s application to participate in the program was preliminarily approved.
     The Series F Preferred Stock qualifies as Tier 1 regulatory capital. Cumulative dividends on the Series F Preferred Stock will accrue on the liquidation preference amount on a quarterly basis at a rate of 5% per annum for the first five years, and thereafter at a rate of 9% per annum, but will only be paid when, as and if declared by the Corporation’s Board of Directors out of assets legally available therefore. The Series F Preferred Stock will rank pari passu with the Corporation’s existing 7.125% Noncumulative Perpetual Monthly Income Preferred Stock, Series A, 8.35% Noncumulative Perpetual Monthly Income Preferred Stock, Series B, 7.40% Noncumulative Perpetual Monthly Income Preferred Stock, Series C, 7.25% Noncumulative Perpetual Monthly Income Preferred Stock, Series D, and 7.00% Noncumulative Perpetual Monthly Income Preferred Stock, Series E, in terms of dividend payments and distributions upon liquidation, dissolution and winding up of the Corporation. The Purchase Agreement contains limitations on the payment of dividends on common stock, including limiting regular quarterly cash dividends to an amount not exceeding the last quarterly cash dividend paid per share, or the amount publicly announced (if lower), of common stock prior to October 14, 2008, which is $0.07 per share. The ability of the Corporation to purchase, redeem or otherwise acquire for consideration, any shares of its common stock, preferred stock or trust preferred securities will be subject to restrictions outlined in the Purchase Agreement. These restrictions will terminate on the earlier of (a) January 16, 2012 and (b) the date on which the Series F Preferred Stock is redeemed in whole or Treasury transfers all of the Series F Preferred Stock to third parties that are not affiliates of Treasury.
     The shares of Series F Preferred Stock are non-voting, other than having class voting rights on certain matters that could adversely affect the Series F Preferred Stock.
     As per the Purchase Agreement, prior to January 16, 2012, the Corporation may redeem, subject to the approval of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, the shares of Series F Preferred Stock only with proceeds from one or more “Qualified Equity Offerings,” as such term is defined in the Certificate of Designations. After January 16, 2012, the Corporation may redeem, subject to the approval of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, in whole or in part, out of funds legally available therefore, the shares of Series F Preferred Stock then outstanding. Pursuant to the recently enacted American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009, subject to consultation with the appropriate Federal banking agency, the Secretary of Treasury may permit a TARP recipient to repay any financial assistance previously provided under TARP without regard as to whether the financial institution has replaced such funds from any other source.
     Until such time as Treasury ceases to own any debt or equity securities of the Corporation acquired pursuant to the Purchase Agreement, the Corporation must comply with Section 111(b) of the Emergency Economic Stability Act of 2008 and applicable guidance or regulations issued by the Secretary of Treasury on or prior to January 16, 2009, relating to executive compensation and corporate governance requirements.
     The Warrant has a 10-year term and is exercisable at any time. The exercise price and the number of shares issuable upon exercise of the Warrant are subject to certain anti-dilution adjustments.
     None of the shares of Series F Preferred Stock, the Warrant, or the Warrant shares are subject to any contractual restriction on transfer, except that Treasury may not transfer or exercise an aggregate of more than one-half of the

F-69


FIRST BANCORP
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
Warrant shares prior to the earlier of the date on which the Corporation receives proceeds from one or more Qualified Equity Offerings in an aggregate amount of at least $400,000,000 and December 31, 2009.
     The Series F Preferred Stock and the Warrant were issued in a private placement exempt from registration pursuant to Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended. On February 13, 2009, the Corporation filed a Form S-3 registering the resale of the shares of Series F Preferred Stock, the Warrant and the Warrant shares, and the sale of the Warrant shares by the Corporation to purchasers of the Warrant.
     Under the terms of the Purchase Agreement, (i) the Corporation amended its compensation, bonus, incentive and other benefit plans, arrangements and agreements (including severance and employment agreements), to the extent necessary to be in compliance with the executive compensation and corporate governance requirements of Section 111(b) of the Emergency Economic Stability Act of 2008 and applicable guidance or regulations issued by the Secretary of Treasury on or prior to January 16, 2009 and (ii) each Senior Executive Officer, as defined in the Purchase Agreement, executed a written waiver releasing Treasury and the Corporation from any claims that such officers may otherwise have as a result of the Corporation’s amendment of such arrangements and agreements to be in compliance with Section 111(b). Until such time as Treasury ceases to own any debt or equity securities of the Corporation acquired pursuant to the Purchase Agreement, the Corporation must maintain compliance with these requirements.
     The possible future issuance of equity securities through the exercise of the Warrant could affect the Corporation’s current stockholders in a number of ways, including by:
diluting the voting power of the current holders of common stock (the shares underlying the Warrant represent approximately 6% of the Corporation’s shares of common stock as of February 28, 2009);
diluting the earnings per share and book value per share of the outstanding shares of common stock; and
making the payment of dividends on common stock potentially more expensive.
     In addition, the net income available to common stockholders will be affected by the declaration of dividends of approximately $20.0 million on an annualized basis and non-cash amortization of the preferred stock’s discount, of approximately $5.4 million on an annual basis for 2009, as a result of this issuance.

F-70