- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------

                                 UNITED STATES
                      SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                            WASHINGTON,Washington, D.C. 20549

                                   FORM 10-K

      (MARK ONE)FOR ANNUAL AND TRANSITION REPORTS PURSUANT TO SECTIONS 13 OR 15(d)
                    OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

          [X]   ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(D)15(d) OF THE
                        SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

                  FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED JANUARYFor the fiscal year ended January 31, 19992002

                                      OR

          [ ][_]   TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (D)15(d) OF
                      THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

          FOR THE TRANSITION PERIOD FROM ________ TO ________ .

                        COMMISSION FILE NUMBERFor the transition period from ___________ to ____________.

                        Commission file number 0-21764

                        SUPREME INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION
             (EXACT NAME OF REGISTRANT AS SPECIFIED IN ITS CHARTER)

                  FLORIDAPerry Ellis International, Inc.
          ----------------------------------------------------------
            (Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)

                      Florida                               59-1162998
          (STATE OR OTHER JURISDICTION OF-------------------------------             ----------------------
          (State or Other Jurisdiction of                (I.R.S. EMPLOYER
         INCORPORATION OR ORGANIZATION)      IDENTIFICATION NUMBER)Employer
          Incorporation or Organization)              Identification Number)

          3000 N.W. 107TH AVENUE, MIAMI, FLORIDA107th Avenue, Miami, Florida              33172
          (ADDRESS OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICES)     (ZIP CODE)--------------------------------------            ----------
          (Address of Principal Executive Offices)          (Zip Code)

                                (305) 592-2830
                                (REGISTRANT'S TELEPHONE NUMBER, INCLUDING AREA CODE)

                               ----------------

        SECURITIES REGISTERED PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(B) OF THE ACT: NONE

          SECURITIES REGISTERED PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(G) OF THE ACT:

                              TITLE OF EACH CLASS:
                     COMMON STOCK, PAR VALUE--------------
             (Registrant's telephone number, including area code)
                               ________________

       Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:  None

          Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:

                    Common Stock, par value $.01 PER SHAREper share
                               (Title of  class)

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrantregistrant (1) has filed all reports required
to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during
the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrantregistrant was
required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing
requirements for the past 90 days.  Yes [x][X]  No [ ][_]

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405
of Regulation S-K  (ss.229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the
best of the registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information
statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any
amendment to this Form 10-K. [ ]

     APPLICABLE ONLY TO REGISTRANTS INVOLVED IN BANKRUPTCY PROCEEDINGS DURING
THE PRECEDING FIVE YEARS.

     Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant has filed all documents and
reports to be filed by Sections 12, 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934 subsequent to the distribution of securities under a plan confirmed by
a court.  Yes [ ]   No [ ][X]

The number of shares outstanding of the Registrant'sregistrant's Common Stock is 6,723,8746,286,740
(as of March 12, 1999)April 15, 2002).

The aggregate market value of the voting stock held by non-affiliatenon-affiliates of the
Registrant'sregistrant is approximately $44,693,206$33,172,976 (as of March 12, 1999)April 15, 2002).

                      DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

The following documents are incorporated by reference:

Portions of the Company's Proxy Statement for the 2002 Annual Meeting - --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------Part III


UNLESS THE CONTEXT OTHERWISE REQUIRES, ALL REFERENCES TO "SUPREME,Unless the context otherwise requires, all references to "Perry Ellis," THE
"COMPANY,the
"Company," "WE,"we," "US" OR "OUR" INCLUDE SUPREME INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION AND
ITS SUBSIDIARIES. REFERENCES IN THIS REPORT TO ANNUAL FINANCIAL DATA FOR
SUPREME REFER TO FISCAL YEARS ENDING JANUARY"us" or "our" include Perry Ellis International, Inc. and its
subsidiaries. References in this report to annual financial data for Perry Ellis
refer to fiscal years ending January 31. ----------------This Form 10-K contains trademarks held
by us and those of third parties.

                                _______________

                          FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

     We caution readers that this report includes forward-looking statements.
We haveand the portions of the proxy statement
incorporated by reference into this report include "forward-looking statements"
as that term is used in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995.
Forward-looking statements are based these forward-looking statements on our current expectations rather than
historical facts and projections about future events.they are indicated by words or phrases such as
"anticipate," "estimate," "expect," "project," "believe," "intend," "envision,"
and similar words or phrases. These forward-looking statements are subject
toinvolve known and
unknown risks, uncertainties and assumptions about us,other factors that may cause actual results,
performance or achievements to be materially different from any future results,
performance or achievements expressed or implied by such forward-looking
statements.

     Some of the factors that would affect our financial performance, cause
actual results to differ from our estimates, or underlie such forward-looking
statements, are set forth in various places in this report and the portion of
the proxy statement incorporated by reference, including among other
things:

       /bullet/under the heading Item
7. "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations" in this report.  These factors include:

     .    general economic conditions;

     .    the effectiveness of our anticipatedplanned advertising, marketing and
          promotional campaigns;

     .    our ability to carry out growth strategies;

     /bullet/.    our expected internal growth;

       /bullet/ consummation of our pending acquisitions and ability to obtain
        additional financing;

       /bullet/contain costs;

     .    our ability to integrate acquired businesses, trademarks, tradenames
          and licenses;

       /bullet/licenses into our existing organization and operations;

     .    our future capital needs and the expected efficiencies fromability to obtain financing;

     .    our new office and warehouse
        facility;

       /bullet/ability to predict consumer preferences;

     .    our ability to compete;

     .    the termination or non-renewal of any material license agreements to
          which we are a party;

     .    anticipated trends and conditions in our industry, including future
          consolidation;

     /bullet/ our future capital needs;

       /bullet/ our ability.    changes in fashion trends and customer acceptance of both new designs
          and newly introduced products;

     .    the level of consumer spending for apparel and other merchandise;

     .    competition among department and specialty stores;

     .    possible disruption in commercial activities due to compete;

       /bullet/ the continued economic health of our markets;terrorist activity
          and /bullet/armed conflict; and

     .    other factors set forth in this report and in our other filings with the
          Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Commission").

     You are cautioned not to place reliance on these forward-looking
statements, which are valid only as of the date they were made. We undertake no
obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statements whether as a result ofto reflect new
information futureor the occurrence of unanticipated events or otherwise.

                                       In light of these risks, uncertainties and assumptions, the forward-looking
events discussed in this report might not occur.2


                                    PART I

ITEMItem 1.  BUSINESS

OVERVIEWBusiness


Overview

     We are a leading licensor, designer and marketer of a broad line of high
quality men's sportswear, including sport and dress shirts, golf sportswear,
sweaters urban wear,and casual and dress pants and shorts, which we sell to all levels of
retail distribution.  We license our trademark portfolio domestically and
internationally for apparel and other products that we do not sell, including
dress sportswear, outerwear, fragrances and accessories.  Beginning in mid
fiscal 2003 we plan to design, license and market women's swimwear under the
Jantzen(R) and Tommy Hilfiger(R) brands, which we acquired in March 2002. We
have built a broad portfolio of brands through selective acquisitions and the
establishment of our own brands over our 32-year35-year operating history.  Our
distribution channels include regional, national and international, department stores,mass
merchants, chain stores, mass merchandisersdepartment stores and specialty stores throughout the
United States, Puerto Rico and Canada.  We are one of the
top 5 branded suppliers to department stores in the knit and woven shirt
product categories. Our largest customers include Dayton HudsonWal-Mart
Stores, Inc., J.C. Penney Company, Inc., Target Corp., Federated Department Stores, Inc.,Mervyn's, Kohl's
Corporation and Sears Roebuck & Co., Kohl's Corporation,
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. and J.C. Penney Company, Inc. We currently use over 70approximately 100
independent suppliers, to source our products, located mostly in the Far East, other parts of Asia, Mexico, and Central
America.

                                       2
America, to source our products.

     Through consolidationacquisition of brands and internal growth, we have experienced
significant overall growth in recent years.  Our total revenues have increasedFrom fiscal 1997 to $224.4 million for fiscal 1999 from $90.6 million for fiscal 1995,
representing2002, we
experienced a compound annual growth rate of 25.5%. During that same period,
our EBITDA (as defined herein; see "Item 6. Selected Financial Data--Summary
Historical Financial Information") grew12.0% in revenues.  In order to
$18.7 million from $7.9 million,
representingcontinue to grow, we plan to selectively evaluate a compound annual growth ratenumber of 24.0%. On a pro forma basis
assuming that our pending acquisition
of Perry Ellis International, Inc. was
completed on February 1, 1998, our EBITDA for fiscal 1999, would have been
$29.0 million. For the estimated effect of the John Henry/Manhattan
acquisition, see "Item 6. Selected Financial Data--Summary Pro Forma and
Supplemental Financial Information."candidates each year.

     We own or license from third parties the brandsbrand names under which most of our products are
sold.  These brandsbrand names include Crossings/registered trademark/Crossings(R), Cubavera(R), Havana Shirt Co.(R)
and Natural Issue/registered trademark/Issue(R) for casual sportswear, John Henry/registered trademark/Henry(R) and Manhattan(R) for
dress casual wear, Perry Ellis(R), Mondo di Marco(R) and Andrew Fezza/registered
trademark/Fezza(R) for
dress sportswear, PingPerry Ellis America(R) for jeans wear, PING(R) and
MunsingwearMunsingwear(R) for golf sportswear and PNB NationPro Player(R) and Nautica(R) for
urban wear.activewear.   We are positioned to enter the women's market for swimwear and
sportswear with the March 2002 acquisition of the Jantzen brands. Through our
"family of brands" marketing strategy, we seek to develop and enhance a distinct
brand name for each product category within each distribution channel.  We also
produce goods sold under the private label program of our various retail
customers. We market our brands to a wide range of
demographic segments, targeting consumers
in specific age, income and ethnic groups.  Currently, our products are
predominantly produced for the men's segment of the apparel industry, in which
fashion trends tend to be less volatile than in other segments.  The percentage
of our revenuesnet sales from branded products increaseddecreased to 81.4%63.0% in fiscal 19992002 from
71.5%66.0% in fiscal 1997.2001.

     We also license our proprietary brands to third parties for the manufacture
and marketing of various products, some of which we do not sell, including underwear, activeweardress
sportswear, outerwear, fragrances and loungewear.accessories.  In addition to generating
additional
sources of revenue for us, these licensing arrangements raise the overall
awareness of our brands.

     In order to expand our licensing operations, we
recently signed a definitive agreement to acquire Perry Ellis International,
Inc. which owns and licenses the prestigious and well-known Perry Ellis brand
name. Perry Ellis International, Inc. had licensing revenues of $16.2 million
for the year ended December 31, 1998. We have also signed a definitive
agreement to purchase the trademarks for John Henry, a leading brand of men's
dress casualwear sold at Sears Roebuck, for Manhattan, a popular dress shirt
brand sold at Wal-Mart and Kmart Corporation and Lady Manhattan. See "The
Pending Acquisitions."

     We believe that our competitive strengths position us well to capitalize on
several trends that have affected the apparel industrysector in recent years.  These
trends include the consolidation of the department and chain store sectors into
a smaller number of stronger retailers, which represent some of our most
important customers; the increased reliance of retailers on reliable suppliers
with design expertise and advanced systems and technology; and the continued
importance of a brandstrong brands as a source of product differentiation.

                                       COMPETITIVE STRENGTHS3


Jantzen Acquisition

     On March 22, 2002, we completed the acquisition from subsidiaries of VF
Corporation of certain assets of the Jantzen swimwear business for approximately
$24.0 million, excluding fees related to the transaction. The Jantzen brands
have a history of over 90 years and its products are sold in upscale department
stores, mid-tier department stores, chain stores, mass merchants and specialty
shops.  The acquisition was financed with a portion of the proceeds from a $57.0
million private offering of 9 1/2% senior secured notes due 2009, which we
closed simultaneously with the acquisition.

     The Jantzen assets we acquired consist primarily of the Jantzen trademarks
and tradenames, license agreements, certain equipment, other items of personal
property, showroom leases and inventory relating to the 2003 season, which
commences on July 1, 2002.  As part of this acquisition, we acquired the
licenses for the Tommy Hilfiger brand for women's swimwear.  We also acquired
the license for the Nike(R) brand for women's swimwear and swimwear accessories.
However, the assignment of this license is subject to the written consent of the
licensor.  We are still in the process of negotiating Nike's consent to the
assignment of its license.  In the meantime, we are working closely with Jantzen
and the licensor to ensure that all of the rights and obligations under the
existing Nike license are preserved and fulfilled until such written consent is
obtained.

     In connection with the Jantzen acquisition, we entered into a lease
agreement with VF Corporation to occupy Jantzen's Portland, Oregon office
facility for an initial six-month period. In addition, we entered into a lease
agreement to occupy a portion of Jantzen's Seneca, South Carolina distribution
center facility for a one-year period.  We also have a right of first refusal
until May 2002 to purchase the Seneca distribution center facility.

     We believe this acquisition opens up a new market for the Company and we
plan to build on Jantzen's reputation for high-quality swimwear.  It will expand
our licensing revenues, add to our strong portfolio of brands, and allow us to
broaden our product line into new product categories, such as women's swimwear
and sportswear.

Notes Offering

     On March 22, 2002, we completed a private offering of $57.0 million 9 1/2%
senior secured notes due 2009.  The proceeds of the private offering were used
to fund the Jantzen acquisition, to reduce the amount of outstanding debt under
our senior credit facility and as additional working capital.

     The senior secured notes are secured by a first priority security interest
granted in our existing portfolio of trademarks and licenses, including the
trademarks and licenses acquired in the Jantzen acquisition; all license
agreements with respect to these trademarks; and all income, royalties and other
payments with respect to such licenses.  The senior secured notes are senior
secured obligations of Perry Ellis and rank pari passu in right of payment with
all of our existing and future senior indebtedness.  The senior secured notes
are effectively senior to all unsecured indebtedness of the Company to the
extent of the value of the assets securing the notes.

Competitive Strengths

     We believe that we have the following competitive advantages in our
industry:

                                       PORTFOLIO OF STRONG BRANDS.4


     Portfolio of Family of Brands.  We currently own fourand distribute nine major brands
(Munsingwear,(Perry Ellis, Munsingwear, Crossings, Natural Issue, John Henry, Manhattan,
Mondo di Marco, Grand Slam and Grand Slam)Jantzen) with a total of over 4041 sub-brands (such
as Penguin Sport(R) and Career Club)Club(R)).  We also design, source and market threefour
other major brands (PNB Nation, Andrew(Andrew Fezza, PING, Nautica and Ping)Tommy Hilfiger), which we
license under existing agreements with various expiration dates and renewal
options.  We also license the Perry Ellis, John Henry, Manhattan, Natural Issue,
Pro Player, Mondo di Marco, Munsingwear and Jantzen brands to licensees for
products that we do not sell directly to retailers. These brands enjoy national
recognition in their respective sectors of the apparel industrymarket and we believe have a
loyal consumer and retailer following.  Brand recognition is critical in the
apparel industry, where strong brand names help define consumer preferences and
drive department store floor space allocation.

     We believe that each of the Perry Ellis International and John Henry/Manhattan
acquisitions will further enhance our established portfolio of recognizable
brands.

     STRONG RETAILER RELATIONSHIPS.Strong Retailer Relationships.  We believe our established relationships
with retailers at all distribution levels give us the opportunity to maximize
the selling space dedicated to our products, 3
monitor our brand presentation and
merchandising selection, and introduce new brands and products.  We have long-standinglong-
standing relationships with our largest customers, includingwhich include J.C. Penney and
Sears Roebuck (more than 2022 years), Federated Department Stores (12(15 years), Wal-Mart (10Wal-
Mart (13 years), Kohl's (6(9 years) and Dayton Hudson (5Target (8 years).  We believe that we have
maintained these long relationships as a result of our quality brand name products
and our dedication to customer service.  Management, in conjunction with our
30 salespeople,staff of sales people and commissioned agents, meets with our major customers
frequently to review product offerings, establish and monitor sales plans, and
design joint advertising and promotional campaigns.  We believe our reliable
delivery times, consistent product quality and quick response to designfashion trends
and inventory demands allow us to meet our retailers' current requirements.  In
addition, our global sourcing network, design expertise, advanced systems and
technology, and new warehousing facility enhance our ability to meet the changing
and increasing needs of our retailers.

     STRONG LICENSING CAPABILITIES AND RELATIONSHIPS.Strong Licensing Capabilities and Relationships.  By actively licensing the
brands we own, we have gained significant experience in identifying potential
licensing opportunities and have established relationships with many active
licensees.  Our acquisition of the Perry Ellis brand during fiscal 2000
positioned us in more retail outlets with more exposure nationally and
internationally. We believe that over the past three years we have successfully
integrated new brands into our business.  We believe that our broad portfolio of
brands appeals to licensees because it gives them the opportunity to sell their
products ininto many different retail distribution channels. For example, a
manufacturer of men's accessories might license the CrossingsNatural Issue brand to sell
to national department stores andor license the Munsingwear brand to target mass
merchandisers.  Further, by aligning our strengths with those of our licensees,
we have been able to enhance our sourcing capabilities, and plan our marketing
campaigns on an aggregate basis to maximize return on investment. We believe
that our licensing expertise, which is supported by a dedicated staff, will
allow us to continue marketing our brands to apparel producers effectively.  WORLD-WIDE LOW-COST SOURCING CAPABILITIES.We
will be bringing our experience and expertise to our Jantzen brands and expect
to position them among the key players in the swimwear and sportswear market.

     World-Wide Low-Cost Sourcing Capabilities.  Our global network of suppliers
enables us to purchase apparel products at competitive cost without sacrificing
quality, while at the same time reacting quickly to our retailers' needs and
maximizing production flexibility.  We developed this expertise through more
than 3235 years of experience in purchasing our products from suppliers around the
world. No individual supplier in fiscal 19992002 accounted for more than 6.9%10.0% of
our total sourcing needs.  We do not have long-term arrangements with any of our
suppliers, thereby affording us greater flexibility in making purchasing
decisions with our vendor base.  We currently maintain a staff of experienced
sourcing professionals, principally located in the United States, Korea, China,
and Taiwan. The Company made the decision during this past year to close its
office in Mexico and expand its Asian operations with the opening of a new
office in Shanghai, China.  This decision was based on the growth of our Far
East sourcing and the better management of the Mexican and Latin American
sourcing through the Miami office.  With the global network of ten sourcing and
quality assurance offices, whichwe closely monitor our suppliers to maintain strict
quality standards and identify new sourcing opportunities.  By sourcing our
products, we manage our inventories more effectively, and do not incur the costs
of maintaining and operating production facilities.

                                       DESIGN EXPERTISE AND ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY.5


     Design Expertise and Advanced Technology.  Our in-house staff consists of
five16 senior designers, who have an average of 18 years of experience, and are
supported by a staff of 1420 other design professionals.  Together, they design
substantially all of our products utilizing computer-aided design technology.
The use of this technology minimizes the time-consuming and costly production of
actual sewn samples prior to customer approval.  It also allows us to create
custom-designed products meeting the specific needs of our customers and
facilitates a quick response to changing fashion trends. Our computer-aided
design system was recently upgraded to allow us to enhance our design technology
produces approximately 800and instantaneously share our designs per monthwith our suppliers globally, and our library
currently contains approximately 52,000 designs.

     CAPACITY FOR GROWTH.react
quicker to new product.

     Capacity for Growth.  We will be able to leverageare leveraging our recent investments in
infrastructure and our skilled personnel to accommodate future internal growth
and selected acquisitions.  Our recent move to a new approximately 238,000240,000 sq. ft. office and warehouse facility in
Miami, with approximately 170,000 sq. ft. of warehouse space, has positioned us
to increase capacity with no significant additional
capital expenditure. This facilityto handle current and future growth. We believe these
facilities, two third-party warehouse facilities in California, our 15,000 sq. ft. of office spacetwo
showrooms in New York and other facilities we use are sufficient to accommodate
current operations and additional personnel.  However,With the Jantzen acquisition we
expect
thatentered into a lease agreement for one-year period with a 60-day option to
acquire a portion of Jantzen's Seneca, South Carolina distribution center
facility.  We also own three acres of land adjacent to our staffing levels will rise at a lower rate thanfacilities in Miami,
Florida, which affords us the opportunity to expand our revenue growth.

     PROVEN ABILITY TO INTEGRATE ACQUISITIONS.primary warehousing and
office space when needed.

     Proven Ability to Integrate Acquisitions.  Since 1993, we have selectively
acquired and integrated fourseven major brands, which currently have over 40 sub-brands. Wesub-
brands.  In assessing acquisition candidates, we selectively target brands that
we believe are underperformingunder-performing and can be revitalized using our competitive
strengths.  To date our most significant brand purchase waspurchases have been our
acquisitions of the Munsingwear brand in 1996.fiscal 1997, the Perry Ellis, John
Henry and Manhattan brands in fiscal 2000, and the Jantzen brands in fiscal
2003. As part of an extensive integration process we:

          /bullet/ repositioned the brand based on our "family of brands"
        strategy;

                                       4


      /bullet/.    improved the responsiveness to market trends by applying our
               design and sourcing expertise;

          and

      /bullet/.    communicated the new positioning of the brandbrands through a widevarious wide-
               ranging marketing program.

As a result, Munsingwear annual revenues increased by 55.7%programs;

          .    continued licensing operations immediately upon acquisition
               without interruption;

          .    solidified the management team to approximately
$66.0 milliondesign and market licensing
               brands;

          .    repositioned the brands based on our "family of brands" strategy;

          .    renegotiated existing contracts and developed new licensing
               agreements in fiscal 1999 from approximately $42.4 million in fiscal 1998,new segments and markets; and

          .    implemented the first full yearsourcing and distribution of our ownership.products previously
               licensed.

We believe that we can successfully integrate additional brands into the Supremeour family
of brands, and revitalize
them. For example, we intend to license the Perry Ellis brand for additional
product categories such as women's wear and expand into geographic areas where
the Perry Ellis brand has been historically underrepresented such as Europe and
Asia.

     EXPERIENCED MANAGEMENT TEAM.revitalizing them consistent with our competitive strengths.

     Experienced Management Team.  Our senior management team averages nearly 20
years of experience in the apparel industry.  Our management team also has
significant experience in developing and revitalizing brand names, licensing
brands; has an established reputation with retailers, the trade and the
financial community,community; and possesses a diverse skill base, which incorporates
brand marketing, sourcing and management information systems.

                                       BUSINESS STRATEGY6


Business Strategy

     Our "family of brands" marketing approach is designed to develop a distinct
brand for each product category within each distribution channel. For example,
we sell our golf sportswear under the Munsingwear brand to mass merchants, under
the Grand Slam brand to department stores and under the PingPING brand to higher-end
retailers, golf shops and resorts. By differentiating our brands in this manner,
we can better satisfy the needs of each type of retailer by offering brands
tailored to its specific distribution channel. In addition, we believe that this
strategy helps insulate us from changing retail patterns, allows us to maintain
the integrity of each distribution channel and helps prevent brand erosion.

     Our objective is to develop and enhance our brands by:

          /bullet/.    carefully maintaining distinct distribution channels for each
               of our brands;

       /bullet/brand;

          .    consistently designing, sourcing and marketing high quality
               products;

          /bullet/.    reinforcing the image of our brands and continuously promoting
               them; and

          /bullet/.    updating our styles to keep them current.

     Controlling strong brands allows us to increase our retail base, license
these brands to third parties, develop sub-brands and grow internationally.

To achieve our objective, we have adopted a strategy based on the following
elements:

     INCREASE BRAND NAME RECOGNITION.Increase Brand Name Recognition. We intend to enhance recognition of our
brand names by promoting our brands at both the retailer and consumer levels. WeAs part
of this effort, we conduct cooperative advertising in print and broadcast media
in which various retailers feature our products in their advertisements. We have also
begunengage in direct consumer advertising in select markets by placingsecuring highly
visible billboards and events, sponsorships, special event advertisements and magazine
advertisementsadvertising in periodicals such
as Men's Health, Maxim and Gentleman's Quarterly.Quarterly in association with specific
regional or national events. We will continue the Jantzen's emphasis in print
advertisements in influential fashion magazines such as In Style, Glamour and
Cosmopolitan and intend to sponsor selected athletes and celebrities in the
future. We believe these campaigns will serve to further enhance and broaden our
customer base. Licensing our brands to third parties also serves to enhanceimprove
brand recognition by providing increased consumer exposure. We have a strong
presence at trade shows, such as "MAGIC" in Las Vegas, Market Week in New York
and golf shows and events throughout the country. We also recently established Webcontinue to maintain
web sites for each of our major brands to position us to take advantage of opportunities
created by the Internet.

     INCREASE DISTRIBUTION.Increase Distribution. We intend to increasehave increased the distribution of our existing
products by expanding the number of regional national and internationalnational retailers that carry
our brands and 5


increasinggained greater penetration in the number of stores in which each
of these retailers sells our products. This increased exposure should broadenhas broadened our
established reputation at the retail and consumer levels. We selectively pursue
new channels of distribution for our products, focusing on maintaining the
integrity of our products and reinforcing our image at existing retail stores,
as well as introducing our products to geographic areas and consumer sectors
that are presently less familiar with our products.

     CONTINUE TO DIVERSIFY PRODUCT LINE.Continue to Diversify Product Line. We intendcontinue to broaden the range of our
product lines, capitalizing on the name recognition, popularity and discrete
target customer segmentation of each major brand. For example, we introduced a
sweater line under the Crossings brand and expanded it to include several of
our other brands. We have also expanded into urban wear with the licensing of
the PNB Nation brand,
dress sportswear with the licensing of the Andrew Fezza brand and high-end golf
sportswear with the licensing of the PingPING brand. EXPAND LICENSING ACTIVITIES.We also entered into the jeans
wear market with the reintroduction of the Perry Ellis America brand in
department stores and expanded the Natural Issue brand in the mid-tier
department stores and chain stores. This year, we added a new brand to the
corporate wear (Advertising Specialty Industry)

                                       7


market with the licensing of the Nautica brand for knits, woven casual shirts,
fleece tops, outerwear and headwear. For fiscal 2003 with the acquisition of
Jantzen we have entered into a new market for the Company with women's swimwear
and sportswear.

     Adapt to Changing Marketplace. The apparel business continues to present
new challenges in changing styles, customer demands and consumer tastes, getting
goods to market, and reacting to the technologies employed by the retailers and
imposed on suppliers. By continuing to strive for improvements in our design
department we continue to develop new designs suited to the various lifestyles
we cater to. Our continuing commitment to sourcing and logistics enables us to
meet the time pressures of gearing up for the new sales seasons, and reacting
quickly to customer demands. Some examples of our ability to meet the challenges
in our business follow:

          .    In January 2001, we started distribution into the corporate wear
               market, which is geared towards selling merchandise to large
               corporations as uniforms and for promotional activities. We
               diversified our internal sales structure to better service these
               customers and their sales channels. We have continued to grow the
               corporate wear business by licensing the Nautica brand and
               integrating it into our distribution flow.

          .    In response to increased private label programs being promoted by
               some of our retail customers, we increased our branded supply
               with private label goods. While these goods generally have lower
               initial profit margins, they represent a steady source of supply
               for the retailer and generate meaningful revenues for us.

          .    The Jantzen acquisition in March 2002 provides us with our first
               entry into the women's swimwear and sportswear market. This step
               gives us the opportunity to apply our design, marketing and
               global sourcing capabilities in the women's wear market. With our
               competitive strengths in the industry we expect to generate
               considerable top line growth for the Jantzen brands over the
               coming years.

     Expand Licensing Activities.  Since acquiring the Munsingwear brand in
1996,fiscal 1997, we have significantly expanded the licensing of our brands to third
parties for various product categories.  Similar to the Munsingwear acquisition, we believe the
pendingThe acquisitions of the Perry Ellis,
John Henry, Manhattan, Pro Player and John Henry/
ManhattanMondo di Marco brands have provided us,
and will continue to provide us, with significant licensing opportunities. The
acquisition of the Jantzen brands is expected to significantly enhance these
opportunities.  We intend to
useare using these nationally-recognizednationally recognized brands to expand our
licensing activities, particularly with respect to additional product categories such as
women's wear and activewear, and to enter into historically underserved
geographic areas which we believe have been historically
underrepresented by these brands,for our Company, such as Latin America, Europe and Asia.  We
plan to workare continually working with our licensees to strengthen their design, finished
products and marketing efforts andcampaigns, thereby increaseincreasing our revenues.  THE PENDING ACQUISITIONS

     PERRY ELLIS INTERNATIONAL, INC. In January 1999, we agreed to buy Perry
Ellis International, Inc. for approximately $74.6 million in cash, net of
purchase price adjustments. Perry Ellis International, Inc. is a privately held
company, which ownsWe also
continually review our possible entry into new markets and licensesprovide potential
licensees with strong brands, design expertise and innovative marketing
strategies.

     Pursue Strategic Acquisitions.  The apparel industry has followed the
Perry Ellis brand, currently oneconsolidation trend of the top selling brands in department stores in the United States. Perry Ellis
International, Inc. is currently the licensor under 34 license agreements,
primarily for various categories of men's wear, boy's wearretail industry as large retailers have continued to
give preferences to more dependable and fragrances. The
purchase of the Perry Ellis brand gives us a widely recognized brand in the
marketflexible vendors.  We are frequently
presented with and will be our premier brand.

     Perry Ellis, who was an internationally-known designer, positioned his
brand to be associated with quality, valueevaluate new acquisition opportunities and innovative designs and to appeal
to high-income, status conscious, 25-50 year-old men. His successors have
maintained the brand's premier image into the 1990's as annual retail sales by
the brand's 34 licensees in various product categories exceeded $900 million in
1998. Perry Ellis International, Inc. is currently one of the largest selling
brands in department stores such as Dillards, Federated Department Stores, Saks
Fifth Avenue and May's Department Stores at retail price points ranging from
$39.99 to $99.99 for dress shirts.

     We intend to capitalize oncontinue
our strategy of making selective acquisitions to add new product lines and
expand our portfolio of brands.   Since 1993, we have acquired, or obtained
licenses for, several brands, including Munsingwear, Perry Ellis' image as a premier brand by
seeking licensing opportunities in the product categories in which we currently
do not have a large presence, such as women's wear and men's accessories, and
into geographic areas historically underrepresented by this brand, such as
Europe and Asia. Currently, Perry Ellis, branded products are principally sold
in the men's wear, boy's wear and fragrance product categories, and are sold
mostly in the United States. We plan to apply the elements of our brand
strategy to the Perry Ellis brand in order to strengthen it. We believe that
our significant experience in identifying strong licensees and our current
relationship with experienced licensees will enable us to capitalize on the
various licensing opportunities for the Perry Ellis brand. We will also work
with Perry Ellis International, Inc.'s current licensees to further enhance the
brand's image and generate greater licensing revenue.

     Although the Perry Ellis brand has international recognition, we perceive
the brand to be underperforming in international markets such as Europe and
Asia. We believe that our brand and licensing experience will enable us to
capitalize on these international opportunities. This acquisition is expected
to close in early April 1999 and is intended to be financed from the net
proceeds of a Rule 144A offering of $100.0 million in aggregate principal
amount of senior subordinated notes due 2009.

                                       6


     JOHN HENRY/MANHATTAN. In December 1998, we entered into an agreement to
buy certain assets of the John Henry and Manhattan dress shirt business from
Salant Corporation, which is currently in a Chapter 11 bankruptcy proceeding.
On February 24, 1999, the bankruptcy court approved the purchase for $27.0
million plus the value of the existing dress shirt inventory (which is
currently estimated to be approximately $17.2 million). The assets to be
purchased consist of the John Henry,
Manhattan, Crossings, PING, Andrew Fezza, Mondo di Marco, Pro Player, Nautica,
Jantzen and Lady Manhattan trademarksTommy Hilfiger. The March 2002 acquisition of the Jantzen brands
presents the Company with an opportunity to apply its design, sourcing,
marketing and trade names, license agreements, certain manufacturing equipment and the
existing dress shirt inventory. Phillips-Van Heusen Corporation has agreed,
subject to certain conditions including regulatory approval, to buy the
existing dress shirt inventory at our acquisition cost concurrently with the
John Henry/Manhattan acquisition and to license from us the John Henry and
Manhattan brands for men's dress shirts. In connection with the acquisition, we
will assume a lease for a shirt manufacturing facility located in Mexico which
expires in July 1999. Although no agreement has been reached, we intend to
sublease the Mexican facility to one of our suppliers for use in the production
of our products or not renew the lease.

     The John Henry/Manhattan acquisition is subjectdistribution expertise to a number of conditions,
including regulatory approval, amendment of our revolving credit facility with
a group of banks (the "Senior Credit Facility"), amendment of a synthetic lease
(the "Lease") entered into to finance our new office and warehouse facility
and, if consummated, is expected to close in late March or early April 1999.
The acquisition price, net of the $1.0 million deposit we have paid and the
proceeds from sale of the existing dress shirt inventory, will be approximately
$26.0 million and is intended to be financed with borrowings under our Senior
Credit Facility,market, which we expect to amend prior to consummation of the
acquisition.

     The licenses to Phillips-Van Heusen have an initial term of three years
and Phillips-Van Heusenbelieve has
options to renew the licensessignificant upside potential for four additional
terms of three years each. The minimum royalty for the first three years would
be approximately $1.5 million and approximately $1.5 million for the John Henry
and Manhattan licenses, respectively, and would increase by varying percentages
in the 12 subsequent years. Phillips-Van Heusen is required to contribute $1.0
million to an overall $3.0 million advertising/marketing campaign for the first
18 months of the license term.

     Upon consummation of the John Henry/Manhattan acquisition, we will pay
Icahn Associates Corp., an affiliate of Carl Icahn, or its affiliates ("IAC") a
financial advisory fee consisting of $1.0 million in cash and a right to
purchase 1,320,000 shares of our common stock at $12.00 per share.
Simultaneously with the exercise of the right, IAC will be required to enter
into a two-year standstill agreement and will receive certain registration
rights with respect to the shares.

     We are currently a licensee for the John Henry brand name and are thus
very familiar with the brand and its potential. The John Henry brand is highly
recognizable, appealing to 25 to 55 year-old middle-income men and is a leading
brand of men's dress casualwear at Sears Roebuck, one of our existing
customers. The John Henry brand is one which consumers associate with quality
and value.

     The Manhattan brand has a history in excess of 50 years. The brand appeals
to 25 to 65 year-old low-income men and is a popular dress shirt at Wal-Mart
and Kmart Corporation. It also has a strong presence in Asia and in other mass
merchandisers such as Meijer's. The brand has been positioned to be associated
with value at a moderate price.

BRANDSus.

                                       8


Brands

     The key components of our brand strategy are to: (a) to provide consistent
high quality products, (b) to distribute theour brands in distinct channels of
distribution, and (c) to reinforce and capitalize on theeach brand's image through new
product development and image advertising. This strategy has enabled us to
increase our customer base, license our brands to third parties and develop sub-brands.

     In fiscal 1999, over 81.4%sub-
brands.


     Nearly 63.0% of our total revenues resulted from sales ofproducts are sold under brands we own or license.license from
third parties.  We currently own fournine nationally recognized brands which are thewhose
products we source and sell to retailers and other channels. These brands
include Natural Issue, Munsingwear, 7
Grand Slam, John Henry, Manhattan, Perry
Ellis, Perry Ellis America, Crossings and Crossings brands.Jantzen.  There have been over 40 sub-brands41 sub-
brands developed from these fournine major brands.  We also have licenses to distribute other
nationally recognized brands including the Ping,PING,
Andrew Fezza, Nautica and PNB Nation
brands.Tommy Hilfiger brands under license arrangements.

     We license Perry Ellis, our premier brand, as well as John Henry,
Manhattan, Natural Issue, Pro Player, Mondo di Marco, Career Club, Crossings,
Munsingwear and Jantzen for product categories that we do not sell directly to
the retailers. Our depth of brand selection enables us to target consumers
across a wide range of ages, incomes and ethnic groups.

     NATURAL ISSUE.lifestyles.

     Perry Ellis. We acquired the Perry Ellis brand, which is associated with
elegance, quality, value, comfort and innovative designs in fiscal 2000.  The
Perry Ellis brand is designed to appeal primarily to high-income, status-
conscious, professional 25-50 year-old men. We primarily license the Perry Ellis
brand to third parties for a wide variety of products.

     Munsingwear.  We purchased the Munsingwear brands along with its associated
sub-brands in fiscal 1997 to appeal to the middle-income 30-70 year-old men who
prefer classic casual sportswear and to sports enthusiasts.  Munsingwear and its
sub-brands have over 100 years of history.   Munsingwear apparel items include
golf shirts, vests, jackets and casual pants.  The Munsingwear brand is
primarily sold in mid-tier department stores such as Mervyn's at retail price
points for shirts ranging from $17.99 to $24.99 and for casual pants from $19.99
to $24.99.

     Some of the successful sub-brands of the Munsingwear brand include the
Munsingwear Lifestyle sub-brands for casual sportswear and the Munsingwear Golf
and Slammer sub-brands for golf sportswear. These sub-brands are sold primarily
to regional mass merchants such as Meijer Inc. at retail price points ranging
from $12.99 to $19.99.

     Grand Slam and Penguin Sport.  We purchased the Grand Slam and Penguin
Sport brands as part of the Munsingwear acquisition in fiscal 1997. Grand Slam,
with its signature penguin icon logo appeals to the middle-income 30-60 year-old
men who prefer a classic casual activewear.  The Grand Slam brand is primarily
sold in mid-tier department stores, at retail price points for shirts ranging
from $24.99 to $34.99 and for pants from $29.99 to $39.99.

     The Penguin Sport brand offers a functional sportswear design aimed at the
golf market.  It is sold primarily in the mid-tier department stores such as
Kohl's and Mervyn's, as well as specialty and sporting goods stores at retail
price points ranging from $33.99 to $35.99.  Grand Slam and Penguin Sport
products include golf shirts, vests, jackets, pants and shorts.

     Natural Issue.  We developed the Natural Issue brand in 1988 to appeal to
middle-income men who are 25-55 years old. The brand is now a well-established
brand which we have positioned to be associated with value and quality.year-old men.  Natural IssueIssue's products include shirts,
sweaters and pants. It is designed to suit the needs of the consumer with a
broad cross-cultural appeal.   We are expanding our pants and shorts and areproduct to include the
Natural Issue Executive Khaki pant line.  Natural Issue is primarily sold in chainthe
mid-tier department stores, such as Sears Roebuck, Kohl's, J.C. Penney and Mervyn's, at retail
price points for shirts ranging from $22.99$26.99 to $30.99.

     MUNSINGWEAR AND GRAND SLAM. We purchased the Munsingwear$34.99 and Grand Slam
brands along with their associated sub-brandsfor pants from $39.99
to $44.99.

     John Henry.  This brand, which we originally licensed and then acquired in
1996fiscal 2000, is designed to appeal to middle income 30-7025-45 year-old men who are sports enthusiasts. These well-known brands
are identified by their signature penguin logo and have over 100 years of
history. We have positioned these brands to be associated with fashion atmen.  Our
product offerings form a moderate price. Munsingwear and Grand Slam products include golf shirts, pants
and shorts."dress casual collection."  The MunsingwearJohn

                                       9


Henry brand is primarily sold in sporting goodsat the mid-tier department stores such as The Sports AuthoritySears
Roebuck (both in the United States and FootLockerCanada) and Mervyn's at retail price
points ranging from $25.99 to $34.99.

     Manhattan. We acquired the Manhattan brand in fiscal 2000. For over 100
years, the Manhattan label has been associated with men's dress shirts. We have
diversified the Manhattan brand in the United States to include a wider range of
sportswear and classic dress-casual apparel. We currently offer an exclusive
collection at K-Mart consisting of pants, shirts and sweaters, in a variety of
styles and patterns geared towards a casual lifestyle. The brand is designed to
appeal to 25-65 year-old men. The Manhattan brand is sold at retail price points
for shirts and sweaters ranging from $12.99 to $26.99.$22.99 and for pants from $19.99
to $24.99.

     Cubavera and Havana Shirt Co.  In fiscal 2000 and 2002, we introduced the
Cubavera and the Havana Shirt Co. brands, respectively.  This line of clothing
is designed to appeal to the growing tropical and Latin influences on consumers'
style and tastes.  Cubavera is currently sold in major department stores such as
Federated Department Stores and May Department Stores, as well as specialty
shops, at retail price points ranging from $29.99 to $39.99.  The Grand Slam brandHavana Shirt
Co. is primarilycurrently sold in department stores
such as Dayton Hudson, Federated Department Stores and May's Department Stores at retail price points ranging from
$24.99 to $39.99.

     Some of the successful sub-brands of the Munsingwear brand include the
Munsingwear Lifestyle/registered trademark/ sub-brand for casual sportswear and
the Munsingwear Golf/registered trademark/ and Slammer/registered trademark/
sub-brands for golf sportswear. These sub-brands are sold primarily to regional
mass merchandisers such as Meijer and Uptons at retail price points ranging
from $18.99 to $24.99.

     We also offer golf sportswear under the Grand Slam Tour sub-brand, which
is sold primarily in golf shops and top-tier stores, and the Penguin
Sport/registered trademark/ sub-brand, which is sold primarily to the chain
stores. The retail price points of the Grand Slam Tour and Penguin Sport
sub-brands are $24.99 to $39.99 and $23.99 to $24.95, respectively.

     CROSSINGS.$34.99.

     Crossings.  We purchased the well-known Crossings sweater brand in 1997 in
orderfiscal 1998 and
positioned it to increase our product offerings to include sweaters appealingappeal to middle-income 25-5535-55 year-old men. This brand was well
known in the 1980's as the premier sweater brand.  We have positioned the brand
to be associated with value and quality and havefurther expanded it to include
shirts.shirts and pants.  The Crossings brand is primarily sold to upscale department
stores such as Federated Department Stores, May'sMay Department Stores and Saks, Fifth AvenueInc.
at retail price points for shirts ranging from $19.99 to $29.99 and for pants
from $19.99 to $29.99.

     Perry Ellis America. We introduced the Perry Ellis America brand for jeans
wear during fiscal 2001.  The Perry Ellis America brand is designed to appeal
primarily to 18-30 year-old men, and is sold at retail price points for shirts
ranging from $19.99 to $39.99 and for pants from $37.99 to $44.99.

     Pro Player.  We acquired the Pro Player brand in fiscal 2001.  This brand
is well recognized in the sports apparel market and appeals to 18-45 year-old
men.  We license and sell this brand to third parties for a wide variety of
products and is sold at retail price points ranging from $22.99$16.99 to $30.99 for sweaters.$22.99.

     Jantzen. We acquired the Jantzen brands in March 2002. With this
acquisition we will be entering the women's swimwear and sportswear market. The
Jantzen brands have a history of over 90 years and appeal to middle-income 30-55
year-old women. The products will be sold in upscale department stores, mid-tier
department stores, chain stores and specialty shops at retail price points
ranging from $49.99 to $89.99.

     PING. We obtained ahave an apparel master license for the prestigious PingPING golf brand, in 1998which is
designed to appeal to high-income 25-50 year-old men who are status-conscious.
The license which covers the world other than Japan, hashad an initial term expiring in December 2001 with the possibility of renewal depending on satisfactory
performance of our obligations under the licensing agreement.2003 and has been renewed
for another year until December 2004. The brand is a well-known and prestigious
golf brand, which we positioned to be associated with the highest standard of
quality in the golf business. Currently, we sellOur products under this brand include golf shirts,
sweaters, pants, outerwearshorts and hats under this brand.outerwear. The PING brand is sold primarily in the golf
shops and top-tier specialty stores at retail price points ranging from $50.00$43.99
to $105.00.

     ANDREW FEZZA.$99.99.

     Andrew Fezza.  We obtained a license for the Andrew Fezza brand, in 1998 to
appeal to high-income 25-50 year-old men who enjoy shopping for designer
clothes. Theunder a license that
covers the United States, its territories and possessions and has an initial
term expiring in June 2003. We have an option to renew this license for an
additional 5five years depending on satisfactory performance of our obligations
under the licensing agreement.but have not yet determined whether we will exercise such
option.  Andrew Fezza is a recognized living American designer who is actively
involved with the design and marketing of the brand.  We have positioned the
brand to be associated with a classic European style at a moderate price. Andrew
Fezza's products include shirts and pants.  The Andrew Fezza brand is primarily sold to
department stores such as May'sMay Department Stores,

                                       8
 Federated Department Stores and
Saks, Fifth AvenueInc. at retail price points for shirts ranging from $21.99 to $29.99 and
for pants from  $19.99 to $34.99.

                                       10


     Tommy Hilfiger.  We acquired a license for the Tommy Hilfiger brand for
women's swimwear as part of the acquisition of the Jantzen brands in March 2002.
The products will be sold in upscale department stores, chain stores and
specialty shops at retail price points ranging from $25.99$49.99 to $34.99 for shirts and $29.99 to $49.99 for pants.

     PNB NATION.$99.99.

     Mondo di Marco.  We obtained a license foracquired the urban-oriented PNB NationMondo di Marco brand in 1998fiscal 2001.  This
brand is positioned to appeal to 15-3018-40 year-old men whose clothes are very important to
their identities and who enjoy the urban culture, music and night life.men.  The license covers the United States and has an initial term of at least two years,
and we have an option to purchase the brand. PNB Nation's products include
shirts, pants and outerwear. TheMondo di Marco brand
is licensed to a third party and is sold primarily sold in urbanup-scale department stores and
sporting goods stores such as The Buckle, Pacific Sunwear and Dr. Jays
at retail price points ranging from $14.99$29.99 to $34.99 for shirts and $39.99 to
$79.00 for pants.

     PRIVATE LABEL.$69.99.

Other Markets

     Private Label. In addition to our sales of branded products, we sell
products to retailers for marketing as private label own-storeor own store lines. In
fiscal 1999,2002, we sold private label products to Target, Wal-Mart, KmartJ.C. Penney,
Goody's, K-Mart, Mervyn's, Meijer and Meijer.Sears Roebuck.  Private label sales
generally yield lower profit margins than sales of comparable branded products. Consequently, our strategy is to increaseproducts,
but they often achieve higher sales of branded
products.volumes.  Private label sales accounted for
approximately 18.6%36.6%, 24.6%34.0% and 28.5%21.0% of net sales during fiscal 1999, 19982002, 2001 and
1997.

PRODUCTS AND PRODUCT DESIGN2000, respectively.

     Corporate wear. We entered into the corporate wear business at the end of
fiscal 2001.  We recognized the change in the current business environment and
have  begun to provide a variety of corporations with high quality designer
products.  We currently offer the PING, Nautica and Perry Ellis brands in this
market.  We sell primarily to corporate wear distributors at price point ranging
from $39.99 to $109.99.

Products and Product Design

     We offer a broad line of high quality men's sportswear, including sportwoven and
dressknit sport shirts, golf sportswear, activewear, sweaters, urban wear andjackets, vests, casual
and dress pants and shorts.  Substantially all of our products are designed by our
in-house staff utilizing our advanced computer-aided design technology.  This
technology enables us to produce computer-generated simulated samples that
display how a particular style will look in a given color and fabric.fabric before it
is actually produced.  These samples can be printed on paper or directly onto
fabric to more accurately present the colors and patterns to a potential retailer.customer.
In addition, we can quickly alter the simulated sample in response to retailerthe
customer's comments, such as a
request to change the colors,of color, print layout, collar style and
trimming, pocket details and/or placket treatments.  The use of computer-aided
design technology minimizes the time-consuming and costly need to produce actual
sewn samples prior to retailer approval and allows us to create custom-designed
products meeting the specific needs of a retailer.customers.

     In designing our apparel products, we seek to fosterpromote consumer appeal by
combining functional, colorful and high quality fabrics with creative designs
and graphics.  Styles, color schemes and fabrics are also selected to encourage
consumers to coordinate outfits and form collections, thereby encouraging
multiple purchases.  Our design staff seeks todesigners stay continuously abreast of the latest
design trends, fabrics, colors, styles and consumer preferences by attending
trade shows and periodically conducting market research in Europe and the United
States.  In addition, we actively monitor the retail sales of our products to
determine changes in consumer trends.

     In accordance with standard industry practices for licensed products, we
have the right to approve the concepts and designs of all products produced and
distributed by our licensees.

     Our products include:

     SHIRTS.Shirts.  We offer a broad line of sport shirts, which include cotton and
cotton-blend printed, yarn-dyed and plainsolid knit shirts, cotton woven shirts,
silk, cotton and rayon printed button front sport shirts, linen sport shirts,
golf shirts, and embroidered cottonknits and woven shirts.  Our shirt line also
includes dress shirts, brushed twill shirts, jacquard knits and yarn-dyed flannels. In
addition, we are aalso the leading distributor in the United States of guayaberaGuayabera
shirts.  We market shirts under a number of our own brands as well as the
private labels of our retailers. Sales under our brands and those licensed by us account for a
significant majority of shirt sales.  Our shirts are produced in a wide range of
men's sizes, including sizes for the big and tall men's market. Sales of

                                       11
shirts accounted for approximately 82%74%, 83%74% and 87%78% of our net sales during
fiscal 1999,
19982002, 2001 and 1997,2000, respectively.

     PANTS.Pants.  Our pants lines of pants include a variety of styles of wool, wool-blend,
linen and poly/rayon dress pants, casual pants in cotton and poly/cotton and
linen/cotton walking shorts.  We offer our pants in a wide range of men's sizes
and generallysizes.
We market themour pants as complementssingle items or as a collection to complement our shirt
lines.  Sales of pants accounted for approximately 11%20%, 11%20% and 7%16% of our net
sales during fiscal 1999,
19982002, 2001 and 1997,2000, respectively.

     OTHER PRODUCTS.Swimwear and Sportswear. With the acquisition of the Jantzen brands in
March 2002, we are entering into the women's swimwear and sportswear market in
fiscal 2003.

     Other Products.  We began to offer sweaters, when we purchased the Crossings
brand in 1997vests, jackets and recently introduced sweaterspullovers under our
other brands.existing brands as well as private label.  The majority of the other products we
sell is

                                       9
are sweaters, which accounted for approximately 4%6%, 6% and 5% of net sales
during fiscal 1999.
We also began to2002, 2001 and 2000, respectively.  With the acquisition of
Jantzen, we will offer a line of urban sportswear, tee-shirtsswimwear accessories beginning in fiscal 2003.

Marketing and outerwear
when we licensed the PNB Nation brand. Sales of other products (including
sweaters) accounted for approximately 7%, 6% and 6% of net sales during fiscal
1999, 1998 and 1997, respectively.

MARKETING AND DISTRIBUTIONDistribution

     We market our apparel products to retailerscustomers principally through the direct
efforts of an in-house sales staff, and independent commissioned sales
representatives who work exclusively for us. These in-house employeesus, and
commissioned sales representatives accounted for approximately 84% of net sales
for fiscal 1999. To supplement our sales efforts, we also use other non-exclusive independent
commissioned sales representatives, who generally market other product lines as
well as ours, and weours. We also attend major industry trade shows in the fashion, golf and
tele-market our products to specialty retailers.corporate sales areas.

     We also advertise to retailerscustomers through print advertisements in a variety of
consumer and trade magazines and newspapers.newspapers, and through outdoor advertising
such as billboards strategically placed to be viewed by consumers.  In order to
promote our men's sportswear at the consumerretail level, we share the cost of conductingconduct cooperative
advertising in print and broadcast media, in which various retailers featurefeatures our products in theirour
customers' advertisements.  The cost of this cooperative advertising is shared
with our customers.  We also conduct various in-store marketing activities with
our retailers,customers, such as placingretail events and promotions and share in the cost of
these events. These events and promotions are in great part orchestrated to
coincide with high volume shopping times such as holidays (Christmas,
Thanksgiving and Father's Day).  In addition to event promotion, we place
perennial displays and signs of our product line with an emphasis on related and
coordinated clothingproducts in highly visible locations and offering promotions geared
to holidays such as Christmas and Father's Day. In fiscal 1997, weretail establishments.

     We started direct consumer advertising in selectselected markets featuring the
Perry Ellis, Natural Issue, John Henry, Grand Slam and Munsingwear brandsbrand names
through the placement of highly visible billboards, sponsorships and special
event advertising.  We will integrate the Jantzen brands in our advertising
campaigns.  We also established
Webmaintain informational web sites featuring our brands and
create and implement editorial and public relations strategies designed to
heighten the visibility of our brands. All these activities are coordinated
around each brand in an integrated marketing approach.

                                       12


     The following table sets forth the principal brand names for our product
categories at different levels of retail distribution.distribution:

PRODUCT CATEGORY ----------------------------------------- RETAIL CASUAL DISTRIBUTION LEVEL SPORTSWEAR - ----------------------- ----------------------------------------- High End Specialty -- Retailer,--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Brand Portfolio Dress Jeans Sports Channel of Casual Casual Wear Golf Shops, Resorts National Department Crossings Stores Perry Ellis America(1) Chain Stores Natural Issue Alexander Martin/registered trademark/ Regional Stores Munsingwear Lifestyle/registered trademark/ Mass Merchandisers Munsingwear Classics/registered trademark/ Urban Stores -- Sporting Goods -- Stores PRODUCT CATEGORY ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- RETAIL GOLF DRESS URBAN DISTRIBUTION LEVEL SPORTSWEAR SPORTSWEAR SPORTSWEARApparel Distribution - ---------------------- ----------------------------- ------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- High End Specialty Upscale Department Mondo di Marco Jantzen(3) Store PING Collection Tommy Hilfiger (3) - --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Perry Ellis(1)Ellis America Crossings Andrew Fezza Jantzen(3) Department Store Cubavera Perry Ellis(1) -- Retailer, Golf Shops, Ping ResortsEllis (1) Perry Ellis America Grand Slam Tour National Department Grand Slam Andrew Fezza PNB Nation Stores Perry Ellis(1) Chain StoresTommy Hilfiger (3) - --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Natural Issue Penguin Sport John Henry(2) Tipo's/registered trademark/ RegionalPro Player Mid-Tier Stores Munsingwear John Henry Natural Issue Munsingwear Jantzen(3) - --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Mass Merchants Store Brands Manhattan Store Brands - --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Green Grass(2) PING Collection - --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Corporate Gear/registered trademark/ -- Golf/registered trademark/ Career Club/registered trademark/ Slammer/registered trademark/ Mass Merchandisers Munsingwear Golf etcetera/registered trademark/ New Step/registered trademark/ Classics/registered trademark/ Manhattan(2) Monte Fino/registered trademark/ UrbanNautica Perry Ellis (1) PING Collection - --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Jantzen(3) Specialty Stores -- -- PNB Nation Sporting Goods Munsingwear -- PNB Nation StoresHavana Shirt Co. Tommy Hilfiger (3) - ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
- ---------------- (1) We willare primarily be a licensor for the Perry Ellis brand in the dress sportswear category upon consummation ofcategory. (2) This includes high-end and specialty golf shops and resorts. (3) We acquired the Perry Ellis International acquisition. (2) We are currentlyJantzen brands and a licensee oflicense for the John HenryTommy Hilfiger brand but, subject to consummation of the John Henry/Manhattan acquisition, will become a licensor of the John Henry and Manhattan brands in the dress shirt product category. 10 We believe that the pending Perry Ellis International and John Henry/Manhattan acquisitions will provide us with additional nationally recognized brands which we can similarly leverage into additional sub-brands, geographic areas and distribution channels.March 2002. We believe that customer service is a key factor in successfully marketing our apparel products and seek to provide retailersour customers with a high level of customer service. We coordinate efforts with retailerscustomers to develop products meeting their specific needs using our design expertise and computer-aided design technology to offer custom-designed products. We also usetechnology. Utilizing our well-developed sourcing capabilities, we strive to produce and deliver products to our customers on a timely basis. Our in-house sales staff is responsible for retailercustomer follow-up and support, including monitoring prompt order fulfillment and timely delivery. We utilize an Electronic Data Interchange ("EDI") system for certain retailerscustomers in order to provide advance shippingadvance-shipping notices, process orders and conduct billing operations. In addition, certain retailerscustomers use the EDI system to communicate their weekly inventory requirements per store to us electronically. We then fill thosethese orders either by shipping directly to the individual stores or by sending shipments, individually packaged and bar-codedbar coded by store, to a retailer's centralized customer distribution center. SOURCES OF SUPPLY13 Sources of Supply We currently use independent contract foreign manufacturers, all of whom are overseas, to produce all of our products. We have 48approximately 100 suppliers fromin countries in the Far East, and other parts of Asia, and 24 suppliers in Mexico and fromin other countries in Central America. We believe that the use of numerous independent suppliers allows us to maximize production flexibility while avoiding significant capital expenditures and the costs of maintaining and operating production facilities. Upon completion of the John Henry/Manhattan acquisition, we will assume the lease for a shirt manufacturing facility in Mexico that expires in July 1999. We intend to sell or sublease the Mexican facility to one of our suppliers for use in the production of our products. We maintain offices in Beijing, Shanghai and Guangzhou, China; Seoul, South Korea; and Taipei, and Mexico City.Taiwan. We also operate through independent agents based in Thailand, Hong Kong, Pakistan, Korea, Turkey, Indonesia, India,Philippines, United Arab Emirates and Sri Lankaother countries to source our products in Asia and to monitor production at contract manufacturing facilities in order to ensure quality control and timely delivery. Similar functions with respect to our Central American suppliers are performed by ourOur personnel based in our Miami, Florida executive offices.office, perform similar functions with respect to our suppliers in Mexico and Central America. We conduct periodic inspections of samples of each product prior to cutting by contractors, during the manufacturing process and prior to shipment. We also have full-time quality assurance inspectors in the Dominican Republic, Honduras, El Salvador and Guatemala and in each of our overseas offices. Finished goods are generally shipped to our Miami, Florida facilitiesfacility for repackaging and distribution to customers. Our return policy permits customersIn fiscal 2003, we will also begin shipments to return any defective productsJantzen's Seneca, South Carolina facility for credit. These returns were not material in any of the last three fiscal years.repackaging and distribution to customers. In order to assist with timely delivery of finished goods, we function as our own customs broker enabling us tobroker. We prepare our own customs documentation and arrange for any inspections or other clearance procedures with the United States Customs Service. We are also a member of the United States Customs Automated Interface program, whichprogram. This membership permits us to clear our goods through United States Customs electronically and generally reducingreduces the necessary clearance time to a matter of hours rather than days. LICENSING OPERATIONSLicensing Operations For the past fourseven years, we have been actively licensing the brands we ownown. The licensing of our brands to third parties for various product categories. Licensingcategories is one of our strategies. The licensing of our brands enhances their image by increasing theirwidening the range and distribution and visibilityof these products without requiring us to make a significant capital investmentinvestments or incur significant operating expenses. As a result of this strategy, we have gained significant experience in identifying potential licensing opportunities and have established strong relationships with many active licensees. 11 We are currently the licensor under approximately 24of 126 license agreements (including 13 acquired in the Jantzen acquisition), for various products including sportswear, outerwear, underwear, activewear, women's sportswear, fragrances, loungewear and loungewear.with the acquisition of Jantzen, women's swimwear. Sales of licensed products by our licensees were approximately $78.7$490.0 million, $73.9$577.8 million and $67.7$485.0 million in fiscal 1999, 19982002, 2001 and 1997,2000, respectively. We received royalties from these sales and sign-up fees from new licenses of approximately $3.1$26.7 million, $4.0$25.8 million and $1.7$22.8 million in fiscal 1999, 19982002, 2001 and 1997,2000, respectively. Upon completion of each ofExcluding accelerated payments by two licensees for early contract terminations during fiscal 2002, royalties decreased last year due to the Perry Ellis Internationalgeneral economic conditions and John Henry/Manhattan acquisitions, we will acquire significant additional licensing operations of nationally recognized brand names. Ascertain licensees experiencing a result of these acquisitions and the overall growth of our licensing operations, we plan to hire an experienced senior executive to oversee and manage these operations.decrease in their sales volume. To maintain a brand's image, we closely monitor our licensees and pre-approveapprove all products licensed.licensed products. In evaluating a potentialprospective licensee, we consider the candidate's experience, financial stability, manufacturing performance and marketing ability of the proposed licensee.ability. We also evaluate the marketability and compatibility of the proposed products and their compatibility with products currently being marketed under that brand.our other products. We regularly monitor product design, development, merchandising and marketing of licensees, and we schedule meetings throughout the year with licensees to ensure quality, uniformity and consistency with our overall marketing, merchandisingproducts. We also give our licensees a view of our products and design strategies. Allfashion collections and our expectations of where our products should be positioned in the market place. In addition to approving in advance all of our licensees' products, we also approve their advertising, promotional and packaging materials must be approved in advance by us.materials. 14 As part of our licensing strategy, we work with our licensees to further enhance the products, brand imagesdevelopment, image, and sales.sales of their products. We offer licensees marketing support and use our relationshiprelationships with retailers to help them generate higher revenues and become more profitable. Our license agreements generally extend for a period of 3three to 5five years with options to renew prior to expiration for an additional multi-year period. AThe typical agreement requires that the licensee pay us the greater of a royalty based on a percentage of the licensee's net sales of the licensed products or a guaranteed minimum royalty that typically increases over the term of the agreement. Generally, licensees are required to spend a percentage of the net sales of licensed products onfor advertising and promotion of the licensed products. CUSTOMERSproducts in their territory. Customers We sell merchandise to a broad spectrum of retailers, including chainmid-tier department stores, upscale department stores, mass merchandisersmerchants and specialty stores. Our largest customers include Dayton Hudson, Sears Roebuck, Federated Department Stores,Target, J.C. Penney, Wal-Mart, Kohl's Wal-Mart and J.C. Penney.Mervyn's. Net sales to our five largest customers aggregatedaccounted for approximately 48%47%, 47%42% and 54%49% of net sales in fiscal 1999, 19982002, 2001 and 1997,2000, respectively. For fiscal 1999,2002, sales to Dayton Hudson, Sears Roebuck, and Federated Department Stores eachTarget accounted for approximately 15%12%, 10%while sales to J.C. Penney and 10%Wal-Mart accounted for approximately 11%, respectively,each. For fiscal 2001, sales to Wal-Mart accounted for approximately 14% of total net sales and sales to J.C. Penney accounted for approximately 11% of net sales. For fiscal 1998,2000, sales to Dayton Hudson and Sears Roebuck eachTarget accounted for approximately 12% and 13% of net sales, respectively. For fiscal 1997, sales to Kmart Corporation, J.C. Penney and Sears Roebuck each accounted for approximately 15%, 12% and 12%, respectively,14% of net sales. No other single customer accounted for more than 10% of net sales during such fiscal years. SEASONALITY AND BACKLOGSeasonality Our products werehave historically been geared towards lighter weight productsapparel generally worn during the spring and summer months. We believe that this seasonality has been reduced with the introduction of fall, winter and holiday merchandise. Our higher priced products generally tend to be less sensitive to economic conditions and the weather as compared to our lower priced products.conditions. While the variation in our sales on a quarterly basis has narrowed somewhat, seasonality can be affected by a variety of factors, including the mix of advance and fill-in orders, the amountsamount of sales to different distribution levels, and overall product mix between traditional and fashion merchandise. 12 We generally receive orders from our retailers approximately five to seven months prior to shipment. For approximately 80.0% of our sales, we have orders from our retailers before we place orders with our suppliers. A summary of the order and delivery cycle for our four primary selling seasons is illustrated below: MERCHANDISE SEASON ADVANCE ORDER PERIOD DELIVERY PERIOD TO RETAILERS - -------------------- ---------------------- -----------------------------
Merchandise Season Advance Order Period Delivery Period to Retailers -------------------- ---------------------- ------------------------------- Spring July to September (1) January to March Summer October to December April and May Fall January to March July to September Holiday April to June to August January to March Summer August to October April and May Fall November to January July to September Holiday February and March October and November
(1) The advanced order period for products under the Jantzen and Tommy Hilfiger brands is September to November. Sales and receivables are recorded when inventory is shipped, with payment terms generally 30 to 6075 days from the date of shipment. At January 31, 1999, ourOur backlog of orders for our products, allinclude confirmed and unconfirmed orders, which we believe, based on industry practice and past experience, will be confirmed. The amount of unfilled orders at a point in time is affected by a number of factors, including the mix of product, the timing of receipt and processing of customer orders, and the scheduling of sourcing and shipping of product, which are expectedin most cases is dependent on the desires of the customer. Backlog is also affected by on-going trend among customers to be shipped prior to September 1999, was approximately $99.6 million,reduce the lead-time on their orders. During the last half of fiscal 2002, a number of customers delayed placing orders and re-orders compared to approximately $104.4 million at January 31, 1998. COMPETITIONour previous experience. As a result of these factors a comparison of unfilled orders from period to period is not necessarily meaningful and may not be indicative of eventual actual shipments. 15 Competition The retail apparel industry is highly competitive and fragmented. Our competitors include numerous apparel designers, manufacturers, importers and licensors, many of which have greater financial and marketing resources than we do.us. We believe that the principal competitive factors in the industry are (1)are: . timeliness, reliability and quality of services provided, (2). market share and visibility, (3). price and (4)fashion, and . the ability to anticipate consumer demands and maintain appeal of products to customers. The level of competition and the nature of our competitors varies by product segment. We believesegment with low-margin, mass-market manufacturers arebeing our main competitors in the less expensive segment of the market and American and foreign designers and licensors are our main competitorscompeting with us in the more upscale segment of the market. We believe that our continued dedication to customer service, product assortment and quality control, as well as our selectiveaggressive pursuit of licensing and acquisition opportunities, directly addressesaddress the competitive factors listed above in all market segments. To date,Although we have competedbeen able to compete successfully butto date, there can be no guaranteeassurance that we will continue to be able to do so in the future. TRADEMARKS We hold or have applied for U.S.Trademarks Most of our material trademarks for our most significant brand names.are registered with the United States Patent and Trademark Office. We may be subject to claims and suits against us, as well asand may be the initiator of claims and suits against others, in the ordinary course of our business, including claims arising from the use of our trademarks. In international jurisdictions, there are several pending claims to our right to use selected trademarks that we own. We do not believe that the resolution of any pending claims in international jurisdictions will have a material adverse affect on our business, financial condition, results of operations or cash flows. EMPLOYEES We employed approximately 385 persons as ofEmployees At January 31, 1999.2002, we had approximately 471 full-time employees worldwide. None of our employees are subject to a collective bargaining agreement,agreements, and we believe thatconsider our employee relations are good. ITEMto be satisfactory. Item 2. PROPERTIESProperties Our administrative offices, warehouse and distribution facility are located in a 238,000240,000 square foot leased facility in Miami, which was built to our specifications and was completed in 1997. The facility is occupied pursuant to the Lease,a synthetic lease, which has an initial term expiring in 2003 and a minimumJune 2002, annual rental payment of approximately $1.1 million$900,000 and a minimum contingent rental payment of $12.3$14.5 million if weon June 30, 2002. We do not renewanticipate renewing the synthetic lease after the initial 5-year term. In March 1998, forwhen it matures. Instead, we anticipate replacing it with a conventional mortgage, which will result in recognition of both an asset and related liability on our balance sheet. For purposes of potential future expansion, we have purchased certainroughly three acres of land adjacent to our facility from a non-affiliated third party for $1.1 million. 13 facility. We also lease 15,000three warehouse facilities in Miami totaling approximately 103,000 square feet from George Feldenkreis, our Chairman and CEO, to handle the overflow of show roomsbulk shipments and officesthe specialty and PING operations. All leases are on a month-to-month basis at market prices. We lease two locations in New York City pursuant to a 9-year lease with a non-affiliated third party expiringtotaling approximately 8,500 square feet each. These leases expire in December 2007. Upon consummation2007 and 2012. These locations are used for offices and showrooms. 16 We lease a retail store in the Sawgrass Mills outlet mall in Sunrise, Florida with 11,240 square feet. This lease expires in September 2005. Since we began leasing this facility in May 2001, we have used this location as a test retail outlet store to sell our brands. We have, through the acquisition of the Perry Ellis International acquisition, we will assumeJantzen, a lease expiringagreement for office space in April 2004 on Perry Ellis International, Inc.'s New York City facilities. We intend to integrate the New York operations of Perry Ellis International, Inc.Portland, Oregon for an initial six-month period. This facility totals approximately 83,900 square feet. In addition, we entered into our existing New York City facility. Upon consummation of the John Henry/Manhattan acquisition, we will assume thea lease for a Mexican shirt manufacturingportion of Jantzen's Seneca, South Carolina distribution center facility expiring on July 31, 1999. We intend to sell or sublease the Mexican facility to one of our suppliers for use in the production of our products.a one-year period, commencing March 22, 2002. This facility employs a work forcetotals approximately 279,000 square feet. The Seneca, South Carolina facility carries an option to acquire the facility, which we can exercise within 60 days of approximately 163 workers which are subject to a collective bargaining agreement.the March 22, 2002 commencement date. In order to monitor Far East production of our respective products in the Far East, we maintain an officeoffices in GuangzhouSouth Korea and China, and also lease offices jointly with Carfel, Inc. ("Carfel"),SPX Corporation, a privately-held corporation controlled by George Feldenkreis, our Chairman of the Board,publicly held company, in Beijing, China and Taipei. ITEMTaipei, Taiwan. Item 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS We areLegal Proceedings The Company is subject to claims and suits against us, as well asit, and is the initiator of claims and suits against others, in the ordinary course of our business, including claims arising from the use of ourits trademarks. We doThe Company does not believe that the resolution of any pending claims will have a material adverse affect on ourits business, financial condition or results of operations or prospects. ITEMoperations. Item 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS None 14Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders Not Applicable. 17 PART II ITEMItem 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT'S COMMON EQUITY AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERSMarket for Registrant's Common Equity and Related Stockholder Matters (a) Market Information Our common stock has been listed for trading on Thethe Nasdaq National Market under the symbol SUPI"PERY" since May 21, 1993.June 1999. Prior to that date, the trading symbol was "SUPI" under our former name Supreme International Corporation. The following table sets forth, for the fiscal quartersperiods indicated, the range of high and low closing bid prices per share of our common stock as reported by Thethe Nasdaq National Market. Such quotationsquotation represents inter-dealer prices, without retail mark-up, mark-downmarkdown or commission and may not necessarily represent actual transactions. HIGH($) LOW($) --------- --------- Fiscal 1998 First Quarter .......... 11.00 8.83 Second Quarter ......... 12.00 10.17 Third Quarter .......... 15.38 11.25 Fourth Quarter ......... 13.13 10.38 Fiscal 1999 First Quarter .......... 16.38 10.38 Second Quarter ......... 17.63 15.13 Third Quarter .......... 17.63 7.50 Fourth Quarter ......... 16.00The last reported sales price per share of our common stock on April 15, 2002 was $11.95.
Fiscal Year 2001 High Low - ---------------- ------ ------- First Quarter $11.69 $ 9.63 Second Quarter 10.25 8.25 Third Quarter 9.94 4.66 Fourth Quarter 6.25 4.50 Fiscal Year 2002 - ---------------- First Quarter $ 7.38 $ 5.69 Second Quarter 9.00 6.26 Third Quarter 8.60 5.11 Fourth Quarter 9.50 5.30
(b) Holders As of March 12, 1999,April 15, 2002, there were approximately 49 holders52 shareholders of record of our common stock. We believe the number of beneficial owners of our common stock is in excess of 1,100. (c) Dividends We have not paid any cash dividends since itsour inception and the Board of Directors doesdo not contemplate doing so in the near future. Payment of cash dividends is prohibited under the Senior Credit Facility.our senior credit facility, synthetic lease, senior secured notes and senior subordinated notes. See Note 10 of Notes 12 and 13 to Supreme'sthe consolidated financial statements of the Company included in Item 8 of this Report.report. Any future decision as toregarding payment of cash dividends will depend on theour earnings and financial position of Supreme and such other factors, as theour Board of Directors deems relevant. 1518 ITEMItem 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA SUMMARY PRO FORMA AND SUPPLEMENTAL FINANCIAL INFORMATION The "Pro FormaSelected Financial Information" set forth below gives effect to (i) the Perry Ellis International acquisition and (ii) a Rule 144A offering of $100.0 million in aggregate principal amount of senior subordinated notes due 2009. The "Supplemental Financial Information" set forth below, in addition to giving effect to the transactions included in the Pro FormaData Summary Historical Financial Information gives effect(Dollars in thousands, except for per share data) The following selected financial data is qualified by reference to, (i) the John Henry/Manhattan acquisition and the related concurrent sale of the existing dress shirt inventory to Phillips-Van Heusen and (ii) additional indebtedness incurred under the Senior Credit Facility to finance the John Henry/Manhattan acquisition. The income statement and operating information give effect to such transactions as if they had occurred on February 1, 1998 and the balance sheet information gives effect to such transactions as if they had occurred on January 31, 1999. The information presented below has been derived from our audited consolidated financial statements, the audited financial statements of Perry Ellis International, Inc. and certain financial information received from Salant Corporation with respect to the John Henry/Manhattan acquisition. This information does not purport to represent what our operating results or financial condition would actually have been had the Perry Ellis International acquisition and/or the John Henry/Manhattan acquisition and related transactions with Phillips-Van Heusen actually occurred as of the dates indicated above or to project our financial condition for any future period. The information presented below should be read in conjunction with, ourthe consolidated financial statements of the Company and notes thereto, the financial statements and notes thereto of Perry Ellis International, Inc., the Unaudited Pro Forma Combined Financial Information andrelated notes thereto included in Item 8 of this report and "Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations." PRO FORMA FISCAL YEAR ENDED JANUARY 31, 1999 PRO FORMA FINANCIAL INFORMATION ---------------------- (DOLLARS IN MILLIONS) STATEMENT OF INCOME DATA: Total revenues ........................................ $ 240.6 Depreciation and amortization ......................... 5.9 Operating income ...................................... 23.1 Interest expense ...................................... 12.8 BALANCE SHEET DATA (AT YEAR END): Working capital ....................................... $ 66.5 Total assets .......................................... 183.4Certain amounts in prior fiscal years have been reclassified to conform to the current year presentation.
Fiscal Year Ended January 31, ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- Income Statement Data: Net sales $190,689 $221,347 $ 229,549 $261,626 $253,034 Net royalty income 4,032 3,057 22,840 25,790 26,681 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- Total revenues 194,721 224,404 252,389 287,416 279,715 Cost of sales 145,991 166,198 171,413 200,884 191,601 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- Gross profit 48,730 58,206 80,976 86,532 88,114 Selling, general and administrative expenses 34,137 39,478 44,480 52,147 57,171 Depreciation and amortization 1,748 2,161 5,181 6,130 6,662 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- Operating income 12,845 16,567 31,315 28,255 24,281 Interest expense 2,782 3,494 13,905 15,766 13,550 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- Income before minority interest and income tax provision 10,063 13,073 17,410 12,489 10,731 Minority interest - - - - 83 Income taxes 2,885 4,491 6,530 4,663 4,040 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- Net income $ 7,178 $ 8,582 $ 10,880 $ 7,826 $ 6,608 ============================================================================= Net income per share: Basic $ 1.10 $ 1.29 $ 1.62 $ 1.17 $ 1.01 Diluted $ 1.08 $ 1.27 $ 1.59 $ 1.16 $ 1.01 Weighted average number of shares outstanding: Basic 6,541 6,674 6,726 6,689 6,517 Diluted 6,666 6,770 6,857 6,745 6,535 Balance Sheet Data (at year end): Working capital 66,166 71,300 70,651 88,879 60,932 Total assets 101,650 108,958 224,873 243,113 234,061 Total debt (a) 39,658 33,511 128,270 137,066 120,828 Total stockholders' equity 55,155 64,946 76,020 82,879 87,204
19 Other Financial Data and Ratios: EBITDA (b) 14,593 18,728 36,496 34,385 30,860 Cash flows from operations (3,101) 14,341 14,047 (2,112) 22,352 Cash flows from investing (4,555) (10,240) (104,091) (5,434) (3,074) Cash flows from financing 7,910 (4,938) 90,097 7,665 (18,319) Capital expenditures 3,828 4,005 2,332 2,712 2,925 Ratio of earnings to fixed charges (c) 4.1x 4.2x 2.2x 1.8x 1.4x
a) Total debt ............................................ 106.5 Total stockholders' equity ............................ 64.9 OTHER FINANCIAL DATA AND RATIOS: Pro Forma EBITDA (a) .................................. $ 29.0 Capital expenditures .................................. 4.0 Ratioincludes balances outstanding under senior credit facilities, long-term debt and current portion of Pro Forma EBITDA to interest expense ......... 2.3x Ratio of total debt to Pro Forma EBITDA ............... 3.7x SUPPLEMENTAL FINANCIAL INFORMATION The Pro Forma Financial Information set forth above does not give effect to the John Henry/Manhattan acquisition because audited financial information for the assets being acquired were not available from Salant Corporation prior to the filing of this report. However, we have been provided with certain unaudited financial information for the 11 months ended November 30, 1998 that has been derived from Salant's internal financial records. Based on this information, EBITDA related to 16 the John Henry and Manhattan brands being acquired for the 11 months ended November 30, 1998 was $3.8 million ("Estimated EBITDA") (see note (b) below). The sum of the $29.0 million Pro Forma EBITDA (with respect to the Perry Ellis International acquisition) set forth above plus Estimated EBITDA is $32.8 million ("Adjusted EBITDA"). The information used to calculate the Estimated EBITDA and, correspondingly, the Adjusted EBITDA may not be reliable because Estimated EBITDA (i) has been obtained from the unaudited financial records of Salant Corporation, (ii) reflects only 11 months of operations and (iii) does not include the impact of any additional costs or expenses that may be recorded by Salant Corporation in December, as a result of normal year end adjustments or otherwise, that relate to the 11 months ended November 30, 1998. Additionally, the Estimated EBITDA and, correspondingly, the Adjusted EBITDA do not take into consideration any expenses of assuming the lease for the dress shirt manufacturing facility located in Mexico, operating that facility or disposing of that facility. Although no agreement has been reached, we intend to either sublease the facility or not renew the lease. The following financial information supplements the Pro Forma Financial Information set forth above to give effect to the John Henry/Manhattan acquisition and related Phillips-Van Heusen transactions by adjusting (i) Pro Forma EBITDA by Estimated EBITDA and (ii) Total Debt and interest expense by the additional debt of $27.0 million and related interest expense of $2.1 million to be incurred to finance the John Henry/Manhattan acquisition (assuming that Phillips-Van Heusen acquires the existing dress shirt inventory concurrently with the closing of the John Henry/Manhattan acquisition) (dollars in millions): Pro Forma EBITDA ..................................... $ 29.0 Estimated EBITDA(b) .................................. 3.8 -------- Adjusted EBITDA(a) ................................. $ 32.8 ======== Interest expense ..................................... $ 14.9 -------- Total Debt ........................................... $ 133.5 -------- Ratio of Adjusted EBITDA to interest expense ......... 2.2x Ratio of Total Debt to Adjusted EBITDA ............... 4.1x - ---------------- (a)long-term debt. b) EBITDA represents net income before taking into consideration interest expense, income tax expense, depreciation expense and amortization expense. EBITDA is not a measurement of financial performance under generally accepted accounting principles and does not represent cash flow from operations. Accordingly, do not regard this figure as an alternative to net income (loss) or as an indicator of our operating performance or as an alternative to cash flows as a measure of liquidity. We believe that EBITDA is widely used by analysts, investors and other interested parties in our industry but it is not necessarily comparable with similarly titled measures for other companies. See "Statements of Cash Flows" in our consolidated financial statements and in the financial statements of Perry Ellis International, Inc. contained in Item 8 of this report. (b) Estimated EBITDA represents the sum of (i) royalty income related to the John Henry and Manhattan brands being acquired less the related direct expenses (which exclude any allocation of corporate expense), in each case for the 11 months ended November 30, 1998 as determined from the financial information provided by Salant Corporation referred to above and (ii) the minimum yearly royalty required to be paid to us by Phillips-Van Heusen pursuant to its license of the John Henry and Manhattan brands. 17 SUMMARY HISTORICAL FINANCIAL INFORMATION (DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT FOR PER SHARE DATA) The following table presents selected historical financial and operating data derived from the audited consolidated financial statements of Supreme and the audited financial statements of Perry Ellis International, Inc. The historical financial data should be read in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements and the notes and the financial statements of Perry Ellis International, Inc. and the notes thereto appearing elsewhere herein and "Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations."
FISCAL YEAR ENDED JANUARY 31, --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 ------------- ------------- ------------- ------------- ------------- SUPREME HISTORICAL STATEMENT OF INCOME DATA: Net sales .................................. $ 90,564 $ 121,839 $ 157,373 $ 190,689 $ 221,347 Net royalty income ......................... -- 759 1,654 4,032 3,057 ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- Total revenue .............................. 90,564 122,598 159,027 194,721 224,404 Cost of sales .............................. 69,187 92,145 122,046 145,991 166,198 ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- Gross profit ............................... 21,377 30,453 36,981 48,730 58,206 Selling, general and administrative expenses .................................. 13,493 20,395 24,729 34,137 39,478 Depreciation and amortization .............. 474 725 1,147 1,748 2,161 ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- Operating income ........................... 7,410 9,333 11,105 12,845 16,567 Interest expense ........................... 1,219 2,224 1,664 2,782 3,494 ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- Income before income taxes ................. 6,191 7,109 9,441 10,063 13,073 Income taxes ............................... 2,319 2,685 3,597 2,885 4,491 ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- Net income ................................. $ 3,872 $ 4,424 $ 5,844 $ 7,178 $ 8,582 ========== ========== ========== ========== ========== Net income per share Basic ..................................... $ 0.73 $ 0.76 $ 0.89 $ 1.10 $ 1.29 Diluted ................................... $ 0.73 $ 0.75 $ 0.89 $ 1.08 $ 1.27 Weighted average number of shares outstanding Basic ..................................... 5,300,000 5,800,000 6,534,446 6,540,604 6,674,103 Diluted ................................... 5,300,000 5,874,470 6,595,147 6,665,635 6,769,810 OTHER FINANCIAL DATA AND RATIOS: EBITDA (a) ................................. $ 7,884 $ 10,058 $ 12,252 $ 14,593 $ 18,728 Capital expenditures ....................... 747 1,309 1,058 3,828 4,005 Ratio of earnings to fixed charges (b) ..... 5.3x 3.8x 5.7x 4.1x 4.2x BALANCE SHEET DATA (AT YEAR END): Working capital ............................ $ 43,067 $ 47,760 $ 23,575 $ 66,166 $ 71,300 Total assets ............................... 55,512 53,735 88,158 101,650 108,958 Total debt (c) ............................. 28,256 6,968 31,949 39,658 33,511 Total stockholders' equity ................. 22,016 43,833 47,775 55,155 64,946
(CONTINUED ON FOLLOWING PAGE) 18
FISCAL YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, ------------------------------------ 1996 1997 1998 ---------- ---------- ---------- PERRY ELLIS INTERNATIONAL, INC. HISTORICAL STATEMENT OF INCOME DATA: Net royalty income ................................... $10,917 $15,660 $16,177 Selling, general and administrative expenses ......... 8,606 7,109 8,398 Depreciation and amortization ........................ 212 226 228 ------- ------- ------- Operating income ..................................... 2,099 8,325 7,551 Interest income ...................................... 144 136 32 ------- ------- ------- Income before income taxes ........................... 2,243 8,461 7,583 Income taxes ......................................... 218 852 760 ------- ------- ------- Net income ........................................... $ 2,025 $ 7,609 $ 6,823 ======= ======= ======= OTHER FINANCIAL DATA AND RATIOS: EBITDA (a) ........................................... $ 2,455 $ 8,688 $ 7,811 Capital expenditures ................................. 47 87 21 BALANCE SHEET DATA (AT YEAR END): Working capital ...................................... $ 1,995 $ (27) $ 2,665 Total assets ......................................... 4,803 3,112 4,563 Total debt ........................................... -- -- -- Total stockholders' equity ........................... 3,439 1,369 3,839
- ---------------- (a) EBITDA represents net income before taking into consideration interest expense, income tax expense, depreciation expense, and amortization expense. EBITDA is not a measurement of financial performance under generally accepted accounting principles and does not represent cash flow from operations. Accordingly, do not regard this figure as an alternative to net income or as an indicator of our operating performance or as an alternative to cash flows as a measure of liquidity. We believe that EBITDA is widely used by analysts, investors and other interested parties in our industry but is not necessarily comparable with similarilysimilarly titled measures for other companies. See "Statements of Cash Flows" in our consolidated financial statements and in the financial statements of Perry Ellis International, Inc. contained in Item 8 of this report. (b)c) For purposepurposes of computing this ratio, earnings consist of earnings before income taxes including minority interest and fixed charges. Fixed charges consist of interest expense, amortization of deferred debt issuance costs and the portion of rental expense of the Leaseour synthetic lease deemed representative of the interest factor. (c) Total debt includes balances outstanding under credit facilities, long-term debt20 Item 7. Management's Discussion and current portionAnalysis of long-term debt. 19 ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS OVERVIEWFinancial Condition and Results of Operations Results of Operations We are a leading designer and marketer of a broad line of high quality men's sportswear, including sport and dress shirts, golf sportswear, sweaters, urban wear and casual and dress pants which we sell to all levels of retail distribution. We have built a broad portfolio of brands through selective acquisitions and the establishment of our own brands over our 32-year operating history. We are currently one of the top five branded suppliers to department stores in the knit and woven shirt product categories. We currently use over 70 independent suppliers, mostly located in the Far East, other parts of Asia, Mexico, and Central America. We own or licensegenerate revenues from third parties the brand names under which mosttwo primary sources: sales of our products are sold. These brand names include Crossings and Natural Issue for casual sportswear, John Henry for dress casual wear, Andrew Fezza for dress sportswear, Ping and Munsingwear for golf sportswear and PNB Nation for urban wear. We market our brands to a wide rangelicensing of demographic segments, targeted at consumers in specific age, income and ethnic groups. Currently, our products are predominantly produced for the men's segment of the apparel industry, in which fashion trends tend to be less volatile than in other segments. The percentage of our revenues from branded products increased to 81.4% in fiscal 1999 from 71.5% in fiscal 1997. We also license our proprietary brands to third parties for the manufacture and marketing of various products which we do not sell, including underwear, activewear and loungewear. In addition to generating additional sources of revenue for us, these licensing arrangements raise overall awareness of our brands. RECENT DEVELOPMENTS In order to expand our licensing operations, we recently signed a definitive agreement to acquire Perry Ellis International, Inc. which owns and licenses the prestigious and well-known Perry Ellis brand name. We have also signed a definitive agreement to purchase the trademarks for John Henry, the leading brand for men's dress casualwear at Sears Roebuck, for Manhattan, the best selling dress shirt brand at Wal-Mart and Kmart Corporation and for Lady Manhattan. PERRY ELLIS INTERNATIONAL ACQUISITION. In January 1999, we agreed to buy Perry Ellis International, Inc. for approximately $74.6 million in cash, net of purchase price adjustments. Perry Ellis International, Inc. is a privately held company which owns and licenses the Perry Ellis brand name, currently one of the top selling brands in department stores in the United States. Perry Ellis International, Inc. is currently the licensor under 34 license agreements, primarily for various men's wear, boys' wear and fragrances. During the years ended December 31, 1998, Perry Ellis International, Inc. had revenues of $16.2 million and EBITDA of $7.8 million. Under our management of the brand, we expect to benefit from certain operating efficiencies and to enhance the licensing royalties the Perry Ellis brand generates. Net income from royalties at Perry Ellis International, Inc. grew 48.2% from fiscal year end December 31, 1996 to December 31, 1998 while operating expenses grew at a rate of 55.6% primarily as a result of increased advertising. JOHN HENRY/MANHATTAN ACQUISITION. In December 1998, we entered into an agreement to buy certain assets of the John Henry and Manhattan dress shirt business from Salant Corporation which is currently in Chapter 11 bankruptcy proceedings. On February 24, 1999, the bankruptcy court approved the purchase for $27.0 million, plus the value of the existing dress shirt inventory (which is currently estimated to be approximately $17.2 million). The assets to be purchased consist of the John Henry, Manhattan and Lady Manhattan trademarks, tradenames, license agreements, certain manufacturing equipment and the existing dress shirt inventory. Phillips-Van Heusen Corporation has agreed, subject to certain conditions including regulatory approval, to buy the existing dress shirt inventory at our acquisition cost concurrently with the acquisition and to license from us the John 20 Henry and Manhattan brands for men's dress shirts. In connection with the John Henry/Manhattan acquisition, we will also assume a lease for a shirt manufacturing facility in Mexico which expires in July 1999. Although no agreement has been reached, we intend to sublease the Mexican facility to one of our suppliers for use in the production of our products or not renew the lease. The John Henry/Manhattan acquisition is subject to a number of conditions, including regulatory approval, amendment of the Senior Credit Facility, amendment of the Lease and, if consummated, is expected to close in late March or early April 1999. The acquisition price, net of the $1.0 million deposit we have paid and the proceeds from sale of the existing dress shirt inventory, will be approximately $26.0 million and is intended to be financed with borrowings under our Senior Credit Facility which we expect to amend prior to consummation of the acquisition. RESULTS OF OPERATIONStrademarks. The following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, selected items in our consolidated statements of income expressed as a percentage of total revenues:
FISCAL YEAR ENDED JANUARYFiscal Year Ended January 31, ------------------------------------ 1997 1998 1999 ---------- ---------- ------------------------------------------------------ 2000 2001 2002 ------ ------ ------ Net sales ............................................ 99.0% 97.9% 98.6%91.0% 91.0% 90.5% Royalty income ....................................... 1.0 2.1 1.4 ----- ----- -----9.0% 9.0% 9.5% ------ ------ ------ Total revenues ....................................... 100.0 100.0 100.0100.0% 100.0% 100.0% Cost of sales ........................................ 76.7 75.0 74.1 ----- ----- -----67.9% 69.9% 68.5% ------ ------ ------ Gross profit ......................................... 23.3 25.0 25.932.1% 30.1% 31.5% Selling, general and administrative expenses ......... 16.3 18.4 18.5 ----- ----- -----17.6% 18.1% 20.4% Depreciation and amortization 2.1% 2.1% 2.4% ------ ------ ------ Operating income ..................................... 7.0 6.6 7.412.4% 9.9% 8.7% Interest expense ..................................... 1.0 1.4 1.6 ----- ----- -----5.5% 5.5% 4.9% ------ ------ ------ Income before minority interest and income taxes ........................... 6.0 5.2 5.86.9% 4.4% 3.8% Minority interest - - - Income tax provision ................................. 2.3 1.5 2.0 ----- ----- -----2.6% 1.6% 1.4% ------ ------ ------ Net income ........................................... 3.7% 3.7% 3.8% ===== ===== =====4.3% 2.8% 2.4% ====== ====== ======
FISCAL 1999 AS COMPARED TO FISCAL 1998 TOTAL REVENUES.Fiscal 2002 as Compared to Fiscal 2001 Total revenues. Total revenues consist of net sales and royalty income. Total revenue grew $29.7decreased $7.7 million or 15.3%2.7% to $224.4$279.7 million in fiscal 19992002 from $194.7$287.4 million in the prior year. The decrease was due to a decrease in net sales of $8.6 million offset by an increase in royalty income of $0.9 million as described below. Net sales. Net sales decreased $8.6 million or 3.3% to $253.0 million in fiscal 19982002 from $261.6 million in the comparable period last year. The decrease is primarily attributable to three factors. First, shipments to K-Mart Corporation were lower in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2002 due to K-Mart's financial difficulties during the year and its bankruptcy filing in January 2002. This decrease totaled approximately $3.0 million. Second, we experienced a short-term delay in receipt of some product orders of approximately $2.0 million, which we previously planned to ship in late January, because a Miami- based bank, which was our primary source of letter of credit financing, was seized by federal regulators. We have since been able to obtain adequate letter of credit facilities with other financial institutions. Third, general economic conditions, which adversely impacted retail sales, resulted in lower than expected sell through and reorder rates from retailers. 21 Royalty income. Royalty income was $26.7 million in fiscal 2002, a $0.9 million or 3.5% increase over the prior year amount of $25.8 million. The increase was due to two one-time accelerated payments for early termination of licensing agreements. Excluding accelerated payments by two licensees for early contract terminations during fiscal 2002 totaling a net of $1.6 million, royalties decreased by $0.7 million last year primarily due to the general economic conditions, which resulted in certain licensees experiencing a decrease in their sales volume. Cost of sales. Cost of sales for fiscal 2002 of $191.6 million was $9.3 million, or 4.6% lower than the prior year amount of $200.9 million due mainly to the decrease in net sales as described above. As a percent of revenues, cost of sales decreased from 69.9% in fiscal 2001 to 68.5% in fiscal 2002, due primarily to a change in our sales mix between private label and branded label sales. Gross profit was $88.1 million in fiscal 2002 or 31.5% of revenues as compared to $86.5 million or 30.1% of revenues in the prior year. Selling, general and administrative expenses. Selling, general and administrative expenses were $57.2 million in fiscal 2002, as compared to $52.1 million in the prior year, an increase of $5.1 million or 9.8%. As a percent of total revenues, selling, general and administrative expenses increased from 18.1% in fiscal year 2001 to 20.4% in fiscal 2002. The increase was due primarily to a charge of $1.4 million resulting from the K-Mart bankruptcy, accounting for the consolidation of our new Canadian joint venture with expenses of $0.9 million in fiscal 2002, expenses incurred by our newly formed European subsidiary of $1.6 million and expenses incurred by our Sawgrass Mills outlet store of $0.6 million. Depreciation and amortization expenses. Depreciation and amortization expense in fiscal 2002 was $6.7 million or 2.4% of revenues as compared to $6.1 million or 2.1% of revenues in fiscal 2001. The increase of $0.6 million in fiscal 2002 as compared to the prior year was due primarily to a full year effect of amortization of the Pro Player and Mondo di Marco trademarks acquired in fiscal 2001. Interest expense. Interest expense in fiscal 2002 was $13.6 million as compared to $15.8 million in the prior year. The decrease is primarily attributable to the decrease in borrowings under the senior credit facility, favorable interest rates and the recognition of $0.7 million in income derived from an interest rate swap agreement entered into by the Company during the third quarter of fiscal 2002. Income taxes. Income taxes in fiscal 2002 were $4.0 million, a $0.7 million decrease as compared to $4.7 million in fiscal 2001. The decrease was due primarily to a decrease in pretax income. The effective tax rates for fiscal 2001 and 2002 were 37.5% and 37.9%, respectively. Net income. Net income for fiscal 2002 decreased $1.2 million or 15.4% from fiscal 2001, as a result of the items discussed above. Fiscal 2001 as Compared to Fiscal 2000 Total revenues. Total revenues consist of net sales and royalty income. Total revenue increased $35.0 million or 13.9% to $287.4 million in fiscal 2001 from $252.4 million in fiscal 2000. The increase was due to increases in both net sales of $32.1 million and royalty income of $3.0 million as a result of internal growth. NET SALES.growth and acquisitions. Net sales. Net sales increased $30.6$32.1 million or 16.1%14.0% to $221.3$261.6 million in fiscal 19992001 from $190.7$229.5 million in fiscal 1998 as brandedthe comparable period last year, due mainly to private label programs with Wal-Mart and J.C. Penney. Sales from private label products grewincreased to represent nearly 81.4%34% of the net sales mix in fiscal 1999 compared to 75.4% of net sales2001 from 21% in fiscal 1998. Within2000. Decreases in branded products, the increase in net sales was primarily the result of the sales growth in the Munsingwear brand where net sales increased by $23.6 million to approximately $66.0 million in fiscal 1999. In addition, net sales of the Natural Issue brand increasedand Munsingwear during fiscal 2001 were somewhat offset by approximately, $10.2 million to $76.2increases in sales of PING, Grand Slam and other brands. Royalty income. Royalty income was $25.8 million for fiscal 1999. In2001, a $3.0 million or 12.9% increase over the portfolioprior year amount of other branded products,$22.8 million. The increase was primarily attributable to the acquisitions of the Perry 22 Ellis, John Henry brand also experienced an increaseand Manhattan brands, which had a full year of operations in netfiscal 2001 and only ten months of operations in the fiscal 2000. Cost of sales. We first introducedCost of sales for fiscal 2001 of $200.9 million was $29.5 million or 17.2% higher than the Andrew Fezza, PNB Nation and Ping brands during fiscal 1999. They also contributedprior year amount of $171.4 million due mainly to the increase in net sales. The increasesAs a percentage of revenues, cost of sales increased from 67.9% in fiscal 2000 to 69.9% in fiscal 2001, due primarily to our increased net sales in fiscal 1999 were slightly offset by declines in net salesmix attributable to private label product as well as markdown pressures from some of our other branded and private label products. ROYALTY INCOME. We had royalty income of $3.1 million for fiscal 1999 compared to $4.0 million for fiscal 1998. The decline of $0.9 millionretailers. Gross profit was primarily due to our relationship with one customer, which shifted from primarily a licensee basis to primarily a sales basis. Net sales to this customer increased by $7.0 million to $11.5$86.5 million in fiscal 1999. 21 COST OF SALES. Cost of sales for fiscal 1999 was $166.2 million2001, or 74.1%30.1% of total revenue as compared to $146.0$81.0 million, or 75.0%32.1% of total revenue for the prior year. Selling, general and administrative expenses. Selling, general and administrative expenses were $52.1 million in fiscal 1998. The decrease2001, as compared to $44.5 million in the costprior year, an increase of sales as$7.6 million or 17.1%, due primarily to increases in payroll, advertising and facility costs to support the increase in revenues from internal growth and acquisitions. As a percentage of total revenues, is a result of our increased sales in branded products, which typically generate higher gross profit margin than private label products. Gross profit was $58.2 million or 25.9% of total revenue for fiscal 1999 as compared to $48.7 million or 25.0% of total revenue in fiscal 1998. SELLING, GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES. Selling,selling, general and administrative expenses including depreciation and amortization, forincreased from 17.7% in fiscal 1999 were $41.6 million or 18.5%2000 to 18.1% in fiscal 2001 due mainly to a full year of total revenueactivities in licensing operations, other increases such as compared to $35.9 million or 18.4% of total revenue for fiscal 1998. The increase is primarily attributable to costs associated with recent license acquisitions and the $0.7 million in costs associated with the increase in temporary personnel hired in connection with our new inventory management system. The costs associated with the recent license acquisitions are primarily related to payroll, advertising and samples. We will continuefacility costs to incur expenses related to start up costs of acquired licenses, includingsupport the completion and integrationrevenue increase, as well as startup cost for the launch of the Perry Ellis International acquisitionAmerica brand. Depreciation and amortization expenses. Depreciation and amortization expense for fiscal 2001 was $6.1 million or 2.1% of total revenues, as compared to $5.2 million or 2.1% of total revenues in fiscal 2000. The increase of $0.9 million in fiscal 2001 as compared to the prior year was due to a full year of amortization of intangible assets from the acquisitions of the Perry Ellis, John Henry/Henry and Manhattan acquisition. We believe that we will achieve greater efficienciesbrands in our new corporatefiscal 2001 as compared to ten months of amortization in fiscal 2000, as well as the amortization of intangible assets from the purchase of the Pro Player and warehouse facility during the comingMondo di Marco trademarks in fiscal year, somewhat offsetting these increases. INTEREST EXPENSE.2001. Interest expense. Interest expense for fiscal 19992001 was $3.5$15.8 million as compared to $2.8 million for fiscal 1998. The increase was the result of additional indebtedness incurred to support the increase in working capital requirements during the fiscal year particularly in the third quarter. INCOME TAXES. During fiscal 1999, our effective tax rate was 34.4% compared to 28.7% in fiscal 1998, which resulted in an increase in the income tax provision by $1.6 million to $4.5 million. The prior year tax rate was lower than normal as we adjusted our provision for overpayments in fiscal 1997. NET INCOME. Net income for fiscal 1999 increased $1.4 million or 19.4% to $8.6 million or 3.8% of total revenue from $7.2 million or 3.7% of total revenue for fiscal 1998. FISCAL 1998 AS COMPARED TO FISCAL 1997 TOTAL REVENUES. Total revenues grew 22.5% or $35.7 million to $194.7$13.9 million in fiscal 1998 from $159.0 million in fiscal 1997 primarily2000. The increase is due to the additional indebtedness incurred as a result of the growth from our acquisitionacquisitions of the Munsingwear brandPerry Ellis, John Henry and Manhattan brands in fiscal 2000, and to a lesser extent the related license income. NET SALES. Net sales foreffect of floating rates increases in interest expense associated with our senior credit facility during fiscal 1998 increased 21.2% or $33.32001. Income taxes. Income taxes during fiscal 2001 were $4.7 million, a $1.8 million decrease as compared to $190.7$6.5 million from $157.4 million forin fiscal 1997.2000. The increase in net salesdecrease was due primarily attributable to the Munsingwear and Grand Slam brands which increased approximately $33.0 million as well as an increase in the Crossings brand. We acquired the Munsingwear brand during the final quarter of fiscal 1997. This increase was partially offset by a decrease in revenue from sales of the Natural Issue brand and private label products. ROYALTY INCOME. We had royalty income of $4.0 millionpretax income. The effective tax rates for fiscal 1998 compared to $1.7 million2001 and 2000 were relatively consistent at 37.5% and 37.4%, respectively. Net income. Net income for fiscal 1997. The increase of $2.3 million was primarily due to the increase in royalties from the licensing of the Munsingwear brand. COST OF SALES. Cost of sales for fiscal 1998 was $146.02001 decreased $3.1 million or 75.0% of total revenue as compared to $122.0 million or 76.7% of total revenue for28.4% from fiscal 1997. The decrease in the cost of sales as a percentage of total revenue reflects a continued shift to more sales of branded products which typically generate higher gross profit margin than private label products. Gross profit was $48.7 million or 25.0% of total revenue for fiscal 1998 as compared to $37.0 million or 23.3% of total revenue in fiscal 1997. SALES, GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES. Sales, general and administrative expenses, including depreciation and amortization, for fiscal 1998 were $35.9 million or 18.4% of total revenue as 22 compared to $25.9 million or 16.3% of sales for fiscal 1997. This increase was due to increased levels of staffing required to service the Munsingwear brand and increased advertising costs relating to the start of consumer advertising2000, as a result of brand imaging. INTEREST EXPENSE. Interest expense for fiscal 1998 was $2.8 million compared to $1.7 million for fiscal 1997. This increase in interest expense was the result of the additional indebtedness incurred by us in connection with the acquisition of the Munsingwearitems discussed above. Liquidity and Jolem labels, as well as to support increased levels of working capital requirements proportionate with the increased levels of revenue. INCOME TAXES. During fiscal 1998, our effective tax rate was 28.7% compared to 38.1% in fiscal 1997. This decrease was the result of our adjustment of our income tax provision because of tax overpayments for the prior two fiscal years. NET INCOME. Net income for fiscal 1998 was $7.2 million or 3.7% of total revenue as compared to $5.8 million or 3.7% of total revenue for fiscal 1997. LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCESCapital Resources We rely primarily upon cash flow from operations and borrowings under our Senior Credit Facilitysenior credit facility to finance operations and expansion. CashNet cash provided by operating activities was $14.3$22.4 million in fiscal 1999,2002, as compared to a usage of cash of $3.1$2.1 million used in operations in fiscal 19982001, and $14.0 million provided by operations in fiscal 2000. The $22.4 million of cash provided by operating activities of $1.9 million in 1997. The $17.4 million increaseoperations in fiscal 1999 cash flow from operations2002 as compared to fiscal 1998the $2.1 million used in operations in the prior year is primarily attributable to earnings and to a decrease in accounts receivable of $7.0 million since the beginning of the year due primarily to decreasesincreased cash collections and lower sales in January 2002 and an increase in inventory of $1.5 million due to the timing of receipts of goods at January 31, 2002 and levels of replenishment inventory. In fiscal 2001, net cash used in operating activities was $2.1 million, primarily attributable to earnings and to a decrease in accounts receivable levels from year-to-year in the amountand inventory of $6.4$13.2 million and $3.2$7.6 million, respectively, as well as increases in accounts payable and accrued expenses of $5.3 million. Netrespectively. In fiscal 2002, net cash used in investing activities was $10.2$3.0 million, in fiscal 1999,principally due to purchases of which $5.0 million was for the deposit on the pending Perry Ellis International acquisitionproperty and $1.0 million was related to the pending John Henry/Manhattan acquisition.equipment. Net cash used in investing activities for fiscal 1998 totaled $4.62001 was $5.4 million, of which $3.8 million related principallymainly due to the new distribution23 acquisitions of the Pro Player and office facility. NetMondo di Marco brands, which totaled $3.5 million, net and $2.7 million in purchases of property and equipment. In fiscal 2002, net cash used in financing activities forof $18.3 million was due mainly to payments made under our senior credit facility of $16.1 million and purchase of treasury stock of $2.2 million. The net decrease in borrowings under the senior credit facility resulted primarily from lower accounts receivable and lower levels of inventories. In fiscal 1999 totaled $4.9 million which was primarily due to a reduction of $6.1 million from borrowings on the Letter of Credit Facilities and the Senior Credit Facility. Net2001, net cash provided by financing activities forwas $7.7 million resulting from the net increased borrowings of $8.6 million under our senior credit facility offset by the purchases of treasury stock of $1.0 million. The net decrease in borrowings under our senior credit facility in fiscal 1998 totaled $7.92001 resulted from $19.9 million which wasin borrowings primarily due to an increase in borrowings under the Senior Credit Facilities. Working capital (current assets minus current liabilities) was $71.3 million at the end of fiscal 1999 as compared to $66.2 million at the end of fiscal 1998. The $5.1 million increase in working capital primarily resulted from an increaseincreases in accounts receivable and other current assets due toinventories, offset by the sales growth$11.3 million repayment of the term loan portion of our senior credit facility. Capital expenditures for fiscal 2002 totaled $2.9 million and deposits madeconsisted primarily of purchases of office equipment, leasehold improvements and computer software. Capital expenditures of $2.7 million for pending acquisitions. The current ratio (current assets divided by current liabilities) was 8.2:1fiscal 2001 consisted primarily of purchases of office equipment, warehouse machinery and 7.9:1 at the end of fiscal 1999 and fiscal 1998, respectively. We have the $60.0 millioncomputer software. Senior Credit Facility In March 2002, we amended our senior credit facility with aour group of banks. As amended, the senior credit facility now provides us with a revolving credit line up to an aggregate amount of $60.0 million. This amendment was done concurrently with the sale of $57.0 million of senior secured notes. The indebtedness under the senior credit facility ranks pari passu with our senior secured notes. The following is a description of the terms of the senior credit facility, as amended, and does not purport to be complete and is subject to, and qualified in its entirety by reference to, all of the provisions of the senior credit facility. The outstanding balance under our senior credit facility was $21.8 million on January 31, 2002. Certain Covenants. The senior credit facility contains certain covenants which require us to maintain certain financial ratios, a minimum net worth and which restricts the payment of dividends. As of January 31, 2002, we were not in compliance with a certain funded indebtedness to EBITDA financial covenant of our senior credit facility. The senior lenders of our bank group under our senior credit facility have waived the noncompliance of the financial covenant in connection with the March 2002 amendment of the senior credit facility. The senior credit facility expires on October 1, 2002 and as such the Company has classified its senior credit facility as current in the consolidated balance sheet as of January 31, 2002. The Company is currently in active discussions to renew or replace its existing senior credit facility. Management believes this discussion will be successfully completed prior to the October 1, 2002 expiration date. Borrowings Base. Borrowings under the senior credit facility are limited under its terms to a borrowing base calculation, which generally restricts the outstanding balances to 85.0%the sum of a) 80.0% of eligible receivables plus 50.0%b) 90.0% of our eligible factored accounts receivable plus c) 60.0% of eligible inventories, as defined.inventory minus d) the full amount of all outstanding letters of credit issued pursuant to the senior credit facility which are not fully secured by cash collateral and e) $9.0 million synthetic lease reserve, which must be maintained until the expiration date of our synthetic lease in June 2002. The maximum amount of borrowing under the senior credit facility attributable to eligible inventory is $30.0 million. Interest. Interest on borrowings is variable based,the principal balance under the senior credit facility shall accrue, at our option, at either a) our bank prime lending rate with adjustments depending upon either LIBOR plus 1.25%our ratio of indebtedness to EBITDA at the time of borrowing or b) 2.75% above the agent bank's prime rate. The Senior Credit Facility contains certain covenants,rate quoted by our bank as the most restrictiveaverage London interbank offered rate ("LIBOR") for 1, 2, 3 and 6-month Eurodollar deposits with adjustments depending upon our ratio of which requires usindebtedness to maintain certain financial ratios and minimum net worth. In addition,EBIDTA at the Senior Credit Facility restrictstime of borrowing. 24 Security. As security for the payment of dividends. The Senior Credit Facility is secured byindebtedness under the senior credit facility, we granted the lenders a first priority security interest in substantially all of our existing and future assets, including, without limitation, accounts receivable, inventory deposit accounts, general intangibles and is guaranteed by our subsidiaries. The outstanding balanceequipment. Lenders under the Seniorsenior credit facility have a second priority security interest in our trademarks. Letters of Credit Facility onAs of January 31, 1999 was $33.5 million. The Senior Credit Facility expires in April 2001. We are currently in the process of amending the Senior Credit Facility to increase the maximum amount available under the revolving portion of the Senior Credit Facility and to add a $20.0 million term loan to the facility. Borrowings under the increased facility will be used to finance the John 23 Henry/Manhattan acquisition for which the acquisition price, net of the $1.0 million deposit2002, we have paid and assuming Phillips-Van Heusen acquires the existing dress shirt inventory, will be approximately $26.0 million. We have entered into an agreement to sell the dress shirt inventory being acquired in the acquisition (with a value currently estimated to be $17.2 million) to Phillips-Van Heusen Corporation concurrently with this acquisition. We intend to finance the $75.0 million acquisition of Perry Ellis International, Inc., with the net proceeds from a Rule 144A offering of $100.0 million in aggregate principal amount of senior subordinated notes due 2009. The remaining net proceeds from the Rule 144A offering will be used to reduce borrowings under the amended Senior Credit Facility. We also maintain threemaintained two letter of credit facilities which total $60.0totaling $42.0 million. Each letter of credit is collateralizedsecured by the consignment of merchandise in transit under that letter of credit. Indebtedness under these letters of credit bears interest at variable rates approximately equal to the lenders' specified base lending rates minus 1.0% per annum. As of January 31, 1999,2002, there was $36.2$31.0 million available under theseexisting letter of credit facilities. OneSubsequent to January 31, 2002, the Company added two additional letter of credit facilities, totaling $25.0 million and reduced the availability under one of its two existing letter of credit facilities by $5.0 million. As of April 15, 2002, the Company had four letter of credit facilities totaling $62.0 million. Senior Secured Notes On March 22, 2002, the Company completed a private offering of $57.0 million 9 1/2% senior secured notes due 2009. The proceeds of the facilitiesprivate offering were used to fund the acquisition of certain assets of Jantzen, to reduce the amount of outstanding debt under the senior credit facility and as additional working capital. Synthetic Lease The synthetic lease, as amended in March 2002, expires in July 1999June 2002 and we have an obligation to pay $14.5 million at the termination of the term. The synthetic lease was entered into with a group of financial institutions to finance the acquisition and construction of our corporate headquarters. The financial institutions assumed our obligation to purchase the facility and, in turn, leased the facility to us. The obligations under the synthetic lease are secured by a security interest in substantially all our existing and future assets, whether tangible or intangible, including, without limitation, accounts receivable, inventory deposit accounts, general intangibles, intellectual property and equipment. In addition to customary covenants found in secured lending agreements, the synthetic lease also contains various restrictive financial and other covenants including, without limitation, (a) prohibitions on the incurrence of additional indebtedness or guarantees, (b) restrictions on the creation of additional liens, (c) certain limitations on dividends and distributions or capital expenditures by the Company, (d) restrictions on mergers or consolidations, sales of assets, investments and transactions with affiliates, and (e) certain financial maintenance tests. Such financial maintenance tests, include, among others, (i) a maximum funded indebtedness to EBITDA ratio, (ii) a minimum current ratio, (iii) a minimum net worth, and (iv) a minimum fixed charge coverage ratio. As of January 31, 2002, we were not in compliance with the funded indebtedness to EBITDA financial covenant. The lessor under, and the other two facilities, aggregating $15.0 million,financial institutions which financed, the synthetic lease have perpetual terms. Capital expenditures, principally associatedwaived the noncompliance with this financial covenant. 25 Contractual Obligations and Commercial Commitments The following tables illustrate our contractual obligations and commercial commitments as of January 31, 2002 and include the new office and warehouse facility, were $4.0 million, $3.8 million and $1.1 million for fiscal 1999, 1998 and 1997 respectively. Capital expenditures, including the integration costs for the pending Perry Ellis International and John Henry/Manhattan acquisitions, for fiscal 2000 and 2001 are expected to be approximately $4.0 million and $4.5 million, respectively. Our products have historically been geared toward lighter-weight products generally worn during the spring and summer months, which typically caused a disproportionately higher amount of revenues to be realized during the first quarter of each fiscal year. The introduction of fall, winter and holiday merchandise has also positively affected the third quarter. Our business is currently more affected by the variations in retail buying patterns than the seasonseffects of the year.transactions and amendments discussed above and in Part I of this report that occurred subsequent to January 31, 2002.
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Payments Due by Period ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Contractual Less than 1 - 3 4 - 5 After 5 Obligations Total 1 year years years years - ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Senior Secured Notes $100,000,000 - - $100,000,000 - ============================================================================================================= Senior Subordinate Notes $ 57,000,000 - - - $57,000,000 ============================================================================================================= Senior Credit Facility $ 21,756,094 $21,756,094 - - - ============================================================================================================= Operating Leases $ 24,654,724 $17,627,421 $3,268,977 $ 2,741,201 $ 1,017,125 ============================================================================================================= Total Contractual Cash Obligations $203,410,818 $39,383,515 $3,268,977 $102,741,201 $58,017,125 =============================================================================================================
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Amount of Commitment Expiration Per Period ------------------------------------------------- Other Total Commercial Amounts Less than 1 - 3 4 - 5 After 5 Commitments Committed 1 year years years years - --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Letter of Credit $11,035,880 $11,035,880 - - - =================================================================================================== Stand by Letters of Credit $ 8,250,000 $ 5,500,000 - $ 2,750,000 - =================================================================================================== Total Commercial Commitments $19,285,880 $16,535,880 - $ 2,750,000 - ===================================================================================================
Management believes that the combination of the borrowing availability under the amended Senior Credit Facility, the completionsenior credit facility, letter of this offering, funds anticipated from changes in working capitalcredit facilities, and funds anticipated to be generated from operating activities will be sufficient to meet our operating and capital needs in the foreseeable future. EFFECTS OF INFLATION AND FOREIGN CURRENCY FLUCTUATIONS We doDerivatives Financial Instruments The Company adopted Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") Statement of Financial Accounting Standard ("SFAS") No. 133, "Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities," as amended by SFAS No. 138, effective February 1, 2001. SFAS No. 133 requires that all derivative financial instruments such as interest rate swap contracts and foreign exchange contracts, be recognized in the financial statements and measured at fair value regardless of the purpose or intent for holding them. Changes in the fair value of derivative financial instruments are either recognized in income or shareholders' equity (as a component of comprehensive income), depending on whether the derivative qualifies as a hedge and is being used to hedge changes in fair value or cash flows. The adoption of SFAS No. 133 did not believe that inflationhave a material effect on the Company's financial statements. 26 During fiscal 2002, the Company entered into derivative financial instruments in order to manage the overall borrowing costs associated with its senior subordinate notes. At January 31, 2002, the Company had an interest rate swap agreement with a notional amount of $40.0 million dollars maturing on April 1, 2006. The swap is a fair value hedge as it has significantly affected ourbeen designated against the senior subordinate notes carrying a fixed rate of interest and converts such notes to variable rate debt. The hedge qualifies for short-cut accounting and accordingly, the interest rate swap contracts are reflected at fair value in the Company's consolidated balance sheet and the related portion of fixed-rate debt being hedged adjusted for an offsetting amount with no effect on the statement of income. At January 31, 2002, the Company had an interest rate cap maturing on April 1, 2006 and a basis swap maturing on April 3, 2003, both with a notional amount of $40.0 million. The interest rate cap hedges against increases in the variable rate of interest paid on the interest rate swap and the basis swap decreased the spread on the interest rate swap for 18 months. Neither of these derivatives qualified for hedge accounting and accordingly, are reflected at fair value in the Company's consolidated balance sheet with the offset being recognized in income for the current period. Interest expense for the fiscal year January 31, 2002 has been reduced by approximately $0.7 million as a result of the recognition of these derivatives. Critical Accounting Policies Our consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. As such, some accounting policies have a significant impact on amounts reported in these financial statements. A summary of those significant accounting policies can be found in Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements. In particular, judgment is used in areas such as determining the allowance for uncollectible accounts receivable, provision for sales returns and allowances, inventory valuations, and provisions for assets impairments on long-lived assets. New Accounting Pronouncements In November 2001, the FASB Emerging Issues Task Force ("EITF") reached a consensus on Issue No. 01-9, "Accounting for Consideration Given by a Vendor to a Customer (Including a Reseller of the Vendor's Products)." This issue addresses the recognition, measurement and income statement classification of consideration from a vendor to a customer in connection with the customer's purchase or promotion of the vendor's products. This consensus is expected to impact revenue and expense classifications by immaterial amounts and have no effect on reported income. In accordance with the consensus reached, the Company will adopt EITF Issue No. 01-9 for its fiscal year beginning February 1, 2002. In July 2001, the FASB issued SFAS No. 141, "Business Combinations." SFAS No. 141 requires the use of the purchase method of accounting for all business combinations initiated after June 30, 2001 and eliminates the pooling- of-interests method. SFAS No. 141 also addresses the recognition and measurement of goodwill and other intangibles assets acquired in a business combination. The Company intends to apply the provisions of this pronouncement to the Jantzen acquisition. SFAS No. 141 is not expected to have a significant effect on the financial position or the results of operations. We purchaseoperation of the Company. In July 2001, the FASB issued SFAS No. 142, "Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets," which changes the accounting treatment as it applies to goodwill and other identifiable intangible assets with indefinite useful lives from foreign suppliersan amortization method to an impairment-only approach. Under SFAS No. 142, proper accounting treatment requires annual assessment for any impairment of the carrying value of the assets based upon an estimation of the fair value of the identifiable intangible asset with an indefinite useful life, or in U.S. dollars. Accordingly, the Company,case of goodwill of the reporting unit to which the goodwill pertains. Under SFAS No. 142, goodwill and identifiable intangible assets with an indefinite useful live are no longer subject to amortization. Impairment losses, if any, arising from the initial application of SFAS No. 142 are to be reported as a cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle. The effective date has not been materially adversely affected by foreign currency fluctuations. NEW ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS In March 1998, the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants issued Statements of Position 98-1, ACCOUNTING FOR THE COSTS OF COMPUTER SOFTWARE DEVELOPED OR OBTAINED FOR INTERNAL USE ("SOP 98-1"). SOP 98-1 provides guidance for capitalizing and expensing the costs of computer software developed or obtained for internal use. SOP 98-1SFAS No. 142 is effective for financial statements for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 1998. Management2001. The Company has adopted SFAS No. 142 for its fiscal year beginning February 1, 2002. In accordance with 27 SFAS No. 142, we obtained a preliminary valuation of all of our trademarks from a third-party independent valuation firm. Based on this preliminary valuation, we do not determinedexpect to record any significant impairment in the effect, if any,value of adopting SOP 98-1. In April 1998,our trademarks upon adoption of the American Institute of Certified Public Accountantsstandard. On October 3, 2001, the FASB issued Statements of Position 98-5, REPORTING ON THE COSTS OF START-UP ACTIVITIES ("SOP 985"). SOP 98-5 establishes accounting standardsSFAS No. 144, "Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets," which addresses financial accounting and reporting for the impairment or disposal of certain costs associated withlong-lived assets. While SFAS No. 144 supersedes SFAS No. 121 "Accounting for the start-upImpairment of operations, linesLong-Lived Assets and Long-Lived Assets to be Disposed Of," it retains many of business, etc. SOP 98-5 requires that coststhe fundamental provisions of start-up activities, including organizational costs, be expenses as incurredSFAS No. 121. SFAS No. 144 also supersedes the accounting and that inreporting provisions of APB Opinion No. 30, "Reporting the yearResults of adoption, start-up costs recorded should be expensed. 24 SOP 98-5Operations---Reporting the Effects of Disposal of a Segment of a Business, and Extraordinary, Unusual and Infrequently Occurring Events and Transactions," for the disposal of a segment of a business. The effective date of SFAS No. 144 is effective for fiscal years beginning subsequent toafter December 15, 1998. Management has not determined the effect, if any, of adopting SOP 98-5. In June 1998, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 133 ACCOUNTING FOR DERIVATIVE INSTRUMENTS AND HEDGING Activities. Among other provisions,2001. SFAS No. 133 establishes accounting and reporting standards for derivative instruments and for hedging activities. It also requires that an entity recognize all derivatives as either assets or liabilities in144 is not expected to have a significant effect on the statement of financial position and measure those instruments at fair value. SFAS No. 133 is effective for financial statements for fiscal year beginning after June 15, 1999. Management has not determinedor the effect, if any,results of adopting SFAS No. 133. YEAR 2000 READINESS DISCLOSURE BACKGROUND. The Year 2000 issue refers to the inability of certain data-sensitive computer chips, software and systems to recognize a two-digit date field as belonging to the 21st century. Many computer software programs, as well as certain hardware and equipment containing date-sensitive data, were structured to utilize a two-digit date field. Accordingly, these programs may not be able to properly recognize dates in the year 2000 and later, which could result in a significant system and equipment failures. This is a significant issue for most if not all companies, with far reaching implications, some of which cannot be anticipated or predicted with any degree of certainty. We recognize that we must take action to ensure that our operations will not be adversely impacted by Year 2000 software failures. We have undertaken a study of our functional application systems to determine their compliance with year 2000 issues and, to the extent of noncompliance, the required remediation. As a result of such study, we believe the majority of our systems are year 2000 compliant. Our current distribution software was modified by expanding the date to be century compliant, and all entry forms were modified using a windowing algorithm. The financial systems Account Receivables, Accounts Payables and General Ledger were replaced with Oracle Financial release 11.01, under Oracle 8.0.5 database. This is year 2000 compliant, and enhances our business analysis capabilities. Our EDI application is software purchased from NGC, a company in Miami Lakes, Florida. While we do not own the source code to this software, NGC provided written certification of year 2000 compliance. Furthermore, we passed the EDI year 2000 compliance test from NRF (National Retail Federation). Resultsoperation of the test can be found at http://www.nrf.com. We are ready to change to the new EDI 4010 documents whenever our customers are ready. Some of our larger customers are already doing 4010 transactions with us. Our EDI software is also ready to convert any non-compliant year 2000 EDI documents to an internal year 2000 compliant transaction. All of our PBXs or telephone systems are year 2000 compliant and were certified and tested by Lucent Technologies. The security system equipment Year 2000 compliant certification could be found under http://www.napcosecurity.com/nsg nsg2000.html. The monitoring company Security One has provided us a Year 2000 certification of any Date Based System. We completed the required remediation noted above, including testing, by December 31, 1998. However, there are also less significant hardware options which will be remediated during 1999. To date, the expense to outsiders incurred by us in order to become year 2000 compliant, including computer software costs, have been $0.2 million and the current additional estimated cost to outsiders to complete such remediation is expected to be $0.2 million. Such costs, other than software, have been and will continue to be expensed as incurred. An assessment of the readiness of year 2000 compliance of third party entities with which we have relationships, such as our banking institutions, customers, payroll processors and others is ongoing. We have inquired, or are in the process of inquiring, of the significant aforementioned third party entities as to their readiness with respect to year 2000 compliance and to date has received indications that many of them are either compliant or in the process of remediation. We will continue 25 to monitor these third party entities to determine the impact on our business and the actions we must take, if any, in the event of non-compliance by any of these third parties. Our initial assessment of compliance by third party is that there is not a material business risk to us posed by any such noncompliance and, as such, we have not yet developed any related contingency plan. FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTSCompany. Forward Looking Statements Except for the historical information contained herein, this "ItemItem 7. Management's"Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" contains forward-looking statements that involve a number of risks and uncertainties, including the risks described elsewhere in this report and detailed from time to time in the Company's filings with the Commission. ITEMItem 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk The market risk inherent in our financial statements represents the potential changes in the fair value, earnings or cash flows arising from changes in interest rates or foreign currency exchange rates. We manage this exposure through regular operating and financing activities and, when deemed appropriate, through the use of derivative financial instruments. Our policy allows the use of derivative financial instruments for identifiable market risk exposure, including interest rate and foreign currency fluctuations. We do not enter into derivative financial contracts for trading or other speculative purposes except for as discussed below. In August 2001, the Company entered into interest rate swap, option and interest rate cap agreements (the "August Swap Agreement"), for an aggregate notional amount of $40.0 million in order to minimize its debt servicing costs associated with its $100.0 million of 12 1/4% senior subordinated notes due April 1, 2006. The August Swap Agreement was subsequently modified through a basis swap entered into in October 2001 (the "October Swap Agreement," and collectively with the August Swap Agreement, the "Swap Agreement"). The Swap Agreement is scheduled to terminate on April 1, 2006. Under the Swap Agreement, the Company is entitled to receive semi-annual interest payments on October 1, and April 1, at a fixed rate of 12 1/4% and is obligated to make semi-annual interest payments on October 1, and April 1, at a floating rate based on the 6- month LIBOR rate plus 715 basis points for the 18 months period October 1, 2001 through March 31, 2003 (per October Swap Agreement); and 3-month LIBOR rate plus 750 basis point for the period April 1, 2003 through April 1, 2006 (per the August Swap Agreement). The Swap Agreement has optional call provisions with trigger dates of April 1, 2003, April 1, 2004 and April 1, 2005, which contain certain premium requirements in the event the call is exercised. As of January 31, 2002, the fair value of the August 2001 swap and the option contracts recorded on the Company's Consolidated Balance Sheet was ($0.08) million and ($0.16) million, respectively. The interest rate cap and basis swap refer to, Item 7. "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Conditions," did not qualify for hedge accounting treatment under the SFAS No. 133, resulting in $0.7 million reduction of recorded interest expense on the Statement of Operations for the fiscal year ended January 31, 2002. As a result of our hedging and interest rate risk policies, a 25 basis point change in interest rates would have impacted the Company's net earnings by approximately $62,700 and $91,500 during fiscal 2002 and 2001, respectively. 28 In conjunction with the March 22, 2002 offering of $57.0 million of 9 1/2% senior secured notes due March 15, 2009, the Company entered into interest rate swap and option agreements for an aggregate notional amount of $57.0 million in order to minimize the debt servicing costs associated with the notes. The swap agreement is scheduled to terminate on March 15, 2009. Under the swap agreement, we are entitled to receive semi-annual interest payments on September 15 and March 15 at a fixed rate of 9 1/2% and are obligated to make semi-annual interest payments on September 15 and March 15 at a floating rate based on the three-month LIBOR rate plus 369 basis points for the period from March 22, 2002 through March 15, 2009. The swap agreement has optional call provisions with trigger dates of March 15, 2005, March 15, 2006 and March 15, 2007, which contain premium requirements in the event the call is exercised. The Company's current exposure to foreign exchange risk is not significant and accordingly, the Company has not entered into any transactions to hedge against those risks. Item 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATAFinancial Statements And Supplementary Data See pages F-1 through F-33F-22 appearing at the end of this report. ITEMItem 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE None 26Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure None. 29 PART III ITEMItem 10. DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICES OF THE REGISTRANT DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OurDirectors And Executive Officers Of The Registrant The information concerning the Company's directors and executive officers are as follows:
NAME AGE POSITION - ----------------------- ----- -------------------------------------------------- George Feldenkreis(1) 63 Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer Oscar Feldenkreis 39 President, Chief Operating Officer and Director Joseph Roisman 53 Executive Vice President Fanny Hanono 38 Secretary-Treasurer Ronald L. Buch 63 Director Gary Dix(1) 51 Director Salomon Hanono 49 Director Richard W. McEwen(2) 78 Director Leonard Miller(1)(2) 69 Director
- ---------------- (1) Member of Audit Committee. (2) Member of Compensation Committee. GEORGE FELDENKREIS founded Supreme in 1967. He has been involved in all aspects of its operations since that time and served as our President and a Director until February 1993, at which time he was elected Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer. Mr. Feldenkreis is also a director, executive officer and principal shareholder of Carfel, an importer and distributor of automotive parts which he founded in 1961. He is Vice President of the Greater Miami Jewish Federation and is a trustee of the University of Miami. OSCAR FELDENKREIS was elected Vice President and a Director in 1979 and joined Supreme on a full-time basis in 1980. Mr. Feldenkreis has been involved in all aspects of its operations since that time and was elected President and Chief Operating Officer in February 1993. Oscar Feldenkreis also serves as a director of Carfel but does not devote any of his working time to its affairs. He is also a board member of the Greater Miami Jewish Federation. JOSEPH ROISMAN was appointed Executive Vice President in September 1995. Previously, Mr. Roisman, who has been employed by Supreme since 1988, was Vice President, Sales. FANNY HANONO was elected Secretary-Treasurer in September 1990. Mrs. Hanono has been employed by Carfel since 1988 in various administrative positions, most recently as Vice President of Carfel. Since 1996, Mrs. Hanono has served as a board member of the Michael-Ann Russell Jewish Community Center. RONALD L. BUCH was elected to Supreme's Board of Directors in January 1996. Prior to his retirement in 1995, Mr. Buch was employed by Kmart Corporation for over 39 years, most recently as Vice President and General Merchandise Manager. GARY DIX was elected to Supreme's Board of Directors in May 1993. Since February 1994, Mr. Dix, a certified public accountant, has been a partner at Mallah Furman & Company, P.A., an accounting firm in Miami, Florida. From 1979 to January 1994, Mr. Dix was a partner of Silver Dix & Hammer, P.A., another Miami accounting firm. SALOMON HANONO was elected to Supreme's Board of Directors in February 1993. Mr. Hanono has been employed by Carfel in various sales capacities since 1987 and currently is its Export Director,regarding compliance with overall responsibilities for Carfel's export sales. Mr. Hanono devotes substantially all of his working time to the affairs of Carfel. 27 RICHARD W. MCEWEN was elected to Supreme's Board of Directors in September 1994. Mr. McEwen serves as a director of Wometco Enterprises, Inc. Prior to his retirement in 1985, Mr. McEwen was Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of Burdines, a division of Federated Department Stores, Inc. LEONARD MILLER was elected to Supreme's Board of Directors in May 1993. Mr. Miller has been Vice President and Secretary of Pasadena Homes, Inc., a home construction firm in Miami, Florida, since 1959. George Feldenkreis is the father of Oscar Feldenkreis and Fanny Hanono and the father-in-law of Salomon Hanono, Fanny Hanono's spouse. There are no other family relationships among Supreme's directors and executive officers. Supreme's executive officers are elected annually by the Board of Directors and serve at the discretion of the Board of Directors. Supreme's Articles of Incorporation were amended in 1998 to divide the Board of Directors into three approximately equal classes with staggered terms. Directors are elected for three-year terms and, in each case, until their successors are duly elected and qualified or until their earlier death, resignation or removal. Messrs. Buch and Hanono hold office until the 1999 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, Messrs. McEwen and Oscar Feldenkreis hold office until the 2000 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, and Messrs. Dix, Miller and George Feldenkreis hold office until the 2001 Annual Meeting of Shareholders. COMPENSATION OF DIRECTORS During fiscal 1999, non-employee directors, with the exception of Salomon Hanono, were compensated at the rate of $1,500 per quarter and $500 for meetings of the Board of Directors or any committee thereof attended during a quarter, up to a maximum of $8,000 per annum. Mr. Hanono receives no cash compensation for his services as a director. Directors are reimbursed for travel and lodging expenses in connection with their attendance at meetings. Directors are also entitled to receive options under the Company's 1993 Stock Option Plan, as amended (the "1993 Plan") and the Directors' Stock Option Plan (the "Directors' Plan"). During fiscal 1999, each non-employee director was granted options to purchase 5,000 shares of Common Stock at an exercise price of $15.75 per share. As of January 31, 1999, the following options were outstanding under the Directors' Plan:
NAME OF OPTIONEE NUMBER OF SHARES EXERCISE PRICE($) EXPIRATION DATE - ---------------------------- ------------------ ------------------- ---------------- Ronald L. Buch ............. 5,000 15.75 May 7, 2008 Gary Dix ................... 5,000 15.75 May 7, 2008 11,250 8.00 June 2, 2000 Richard W. McEwen .......... 5,000 15.75 May 7, 2008 7,500 8.00 June 2, 2000 Leonard Miller ............. 5,000 15.75 May 7, 2008 11,250 8.00 June 2, 2000 Salomon Hanono ............. 5,000 15.75 May 7, 2008 11,250 8.00 June 2, 2000
COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 16(A) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 Section 16(a)16 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 as amended, requires the Company's executive officers, directors and holders of more than ten percent of the Company's Common Stock, to file reports of ownership and changes in ownership with the Securities and Exchange Commission and the Nasdaq National Market. Such persons are required to furnish the Company with copies of all Section 16(a) forms they file. 28 Based solely on it review of the copies of such forms received by it, or oral or written representations from certain reporting persons from whom no Form 5 were required, Supreme believes that, with respect to fiscal 1999, its executive officers, directors and greater than ten percent beneficial owners complied with all such filing requirement, except that due to an administrative oversight, Joseph Reisman, Supreme's Executive Vice President, failed to timely file a Form 5 reporting a May 1998 grant of 3,000 options under the 1993 Plan. ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE The following compensation table sets forth for fiscal 1999, fiscal 1998 and fiscal 1997, the cash and certain other compensation paid to the Chief Executive Officer ("CEO") and such other executive officers whose annual salary and bonus exceeded $100,000 during fiscal 1999 (together with the CEO, collectively, the "Named Executive Officers"):
LONG-TERM ANNUAL COMPENSATION COMPENSATION AWARDS -------------------------- ---------------------------------------------- SECURITIES UNDERLYING ALL OTHER NAME AND PRINCIPAL POSITION FISCAL YEAR SALARY ($) BONUS ($) OPTION/SAR'S (#) COMPENSATION ($)(1) - ----------------------------- ------------- ------------ ----------- ----------------------- -------------------- George Feldenkreis 1999 141,000 0 150,000 1,731 Chairman and CEO 1998 125,000 100,000 -- 4,750 1997 120,000 50,000 -- 500 Oscar Feldenkreis 1999 373,000 200,000 55,000 1,753 President and Chief 1998 350,000 460,000 -- 4,750 Operating Officer 1997 350,000 450,000 -- 500 Joseph Roisman 1999 152,000 15,000 3,000 1,109 Executive Vice President 1998 147,000 21,000 -- 4,750 1997 140,000 10,000 -- 500
- ---------------- (1) The dollar amount represents Company contributions for the Named Executive Officer under the Company's 401(K) plan. EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENTS Supreme has an employment agreement with Oscar Feldenkreis, the President and Chief Operating Officer, which was renewed in May 1998 for a two-year period. In connection with the renewal of the employment agreement, Mr. Feldenkreis was granted ten-year options under the 1993 Plan to purchase a total of 55,000 shares of Common Stock at an exercise price of $15.75 per share. The employment agreement provides for an annual salary of $350,000, subject to annual cost-of-living increases, and an annual bonus as maythis item will be determined by the Compensation Committee in its discretion, up to a maximum of $500,000. The employment agreement also prohibits Mr. Feldenkreis from directly or indirectly competing with us for one year after termination of his employment for any reason except our termination of Mr. Feldenkreis without cause. Upon termination of the employment agreement by reason of his death or disability, Mr. Feldenkreis or his estate will receive a lump sum payment equal to one year's salary plus a bonus as may be determined by the Compensation Committee in its discretion. Supreme also has an employment agreement with George Feldenkreis, the Chairman of the Board and CEO, which was renewed in May 1998 for a two-year period. In connection with the renewal of the employment agreement, Mr. Feldenkreis was granted options under the 1993 Plan to purchase a total of 150,000 shares of Common Stock at an exercise price of $15.75 per share. The employment agreement provides for an annual salary of $375,000, subject to annual cost-of-living increases, and an annual bonus as may be determined by the Compensation Committee in its discretion, up to a maximum of $250,000. George Feldenkreis' employment agreement contains termination and non-competition provisions similar to those set forth in Oscar Feldenkreis' agreement. 29 OPTION GRANTS IN LAST FISCAL YEAR The following table sets forth information concerning individual grants of options made during fiscal 1999the Company's definitive Proxy Statement, to any of the Named Executive Officers.
OPTIONS GRANTED IN LAST FISCAL YEAR -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- POTENTIAL REALIZABLE VALUE AT ASSUMED ANNUAL RATES OF STOCK PRICE % OF TOTAL APPRECIATION FOR NUMBER OF SHARES OPTIONS GRANTED EXERCISE OR OPTION TERM ($)(1) UNDERLYING OPTIONS TO EMPLOYEES IN BASE PRICE EXPIRATION ---------------------- NAME GRANTED (#)(1) FISCAL YEAR ($/SH) DATE 5% 10% - ------------------------- -------------------- ----------------- ------------ ----------- ----------- ---------- George Feldenkreis ...... 150,000 38.8 15.75 5/07/08 1,485,764 3,765,217 Oscar Feldenkreis ....... 55,000 14.2 15.75 5/07/08 544,780 1,380,579 Joseph Roisman .......... 3,000 0.8 10.00 5/04/03 8,288 18,315
- ---------------- (1) Based upon the exercise price, which was equal to the fair market on the date of grant, and annual appreciation at the rate stated on such price through the expiration date of the options. Amounts represented hypothetical gains that could be achieved for the options if exercised atfiled within 120 days after the end of the term.fiscal year covered by this Form 10-K, and is incorporated by reference from the Company's Proxy Statement. Item 11. Executive Compensation The assumed 5% and 10% rates of stock price appreciation are providedinformation required by this item will be set forth in accordance with the rulesCompany's definitive Proxy Statement, to be filed within 120 days after the end of the Securitiesfiscal year covered by this Form 10-K, and Exchange Commission (the "Commission") and do not representis incorporated by reference from the Company's estimate or projectionProxy Statement. Item 12. Security Ownership Of Certain Beneficial Owners And Management The information required by this item will be set forth in the Company's definitive Proxy Statement, to be filed within 120 days after the end of the future stock price. Actual gains, if any, are contingent uponfiscal year covered by this Form 10-K, and is incorporated by reference from the continued employmentCompany's Proxy Statement. Item 13. Certain Relationships And Related Transactions The information required by this item will be set forth in the Company's definitive Proxy Statement, to be filed within 120 days after the end of the Named Executive Officer through the expiration date, as well as being dependent upon the general performance of the Common Stock. The potential realizable values have not taken into account amounts required to be paid for federal income taxes. STOCK OPTIONS HELD AT END OF FISCAL 1999 The following table indicates the total numberfiscal year covered by this Form 10-K, and value of exercisable and unexercisable stock options heldis incorporated by each of the Named Executive Officers as of January 31, 1999. No options to purchase stock were exercised by any of the Named Executive Officers in fiscal 1999.
NUMBER OF SECURITIES VALUE OF UNEXERCISED UNDERLYING UNEXERCISED IN-THE-MONEY OPTIONS AT FISCAL YEAR-END (#) OPTIONS AT FISCAL YEAR-END ($) ------------------------------- --------------------------------- NAME EXERCISABLE UNEXERCISABLE EXERCISABLE(1) UNEXERCISABLE - ---------------------------- ------------- --------------- ---------------- -------------- George Feldenkreis ......... 150,000 0 37,500 0 Oscar Feldenkreis .......... 100,000 0 354,400 0 Joseph Roisman ............. 12,000 2,250 98,213 13,500
- ---------------- (1) Based on the Nasdaq National Market last sales price forreference from the Company's Common Stock on January 29, 1999 in the amount of $16.00 per share. COMPENSATION COMMITTEE INTERLOCKS AND INSIDER PARTICIPATION None.Proxy Statement. 30 ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT The following table sets forth certain information regarding the beneficial ownership of the Company's Common Stock as of January 31, 1999, by (i) each of the shareholders of the Company who is known by the Company to own more than 5% of the outstanding shares of Common Stock, (ii) each director of the Company, (iii) each Named Executive Officer and (iv) all directors and executive officers of the Company as a group.
NAME AND ADDRESS OF BENEFICIAL OWNER(1)(2) NUMBER OF SHARES % OF CLASS OUTSTANDING - -------------------------------------------- ------------------ ----------------------- George Feldenkreis(3) ...................... 1,738,153 25.3 Oscar Feldenkreis(4) ....................... 1,308,188 19.2 Fanny Hanono(5) ............................ 399,858 6.0 Salomon Hanono(5)(6) ....................... 416,108 6.2 Carfel, Inc.(7) ............................ 361,525 5.4 Joseph Roisman(8) .......................... 13,500 * Ronald Buch(9) ............................. 5,750 * Gary Dix(10) ............................... 21,800 * Richard W. McEwen(11) ...................... 14,750 * Leonard Miller(12) ......................... 55,250 * FMR Corporation 82 Devonshire Street Boston, Massachusetts 02109(13) ........... 872,500 13.0 The Kaufmann Funds, Inc. 140 East 45th Street, 43rd Floor New York, New York 10017(14) .............. 450,000 6.7 All directors and executive offers as a group (9 persons)(15) ................ 3,405,199 48.4
- ---------------- * Less than 1%. (1) Except as otherwise indicated, the address of each beneficial owner is c/o Supreme International Corporation, 3000 N.W. 107th Avenue, Miami, Florida 33172. (2) Except as otherwise indicated, we believe that all beneficial owners named in the table have sole voting and investment power with respect to all shares of Common Stock beneficially owned by them. (3) Represents (a) 1,141,728 shares of Common Stock held by George Feldenkreis, (b) 150,000 shares of Common Stock issuable upon the exercise of stock options held by George Feldenkreis, (c) 361,525 shares of Common Stock held by Carfel, of which company Mr. Feldenkreis is a director, executive officer and principal shareholder and (d) 84,900 shares of Common Stock held by a charitable foundation of which George Feldenkreis, Oscar Feldenkreis and Fanny Hanono are each directors and officers (the "Foundation"). (4) Represents (a) 1,122,288 shares of Common Stock held by a limited partnership of which Oscar Feldenkreis is the sole shareholder of the general partner and the sole limited partner, (b) 1,000 shares of Common Stock held by Mr. Feldenkreis directly, (c) 100,000 shares of Common Stock issuable upon the exercise of stock options held by Oscar Feldenkreis and (d) 84,900 shares held by the Foundation. (5) Represents (a) 314,958 shares of Common Stock held by a limited partnership of which Fanny Hanono is the sole shareholder of the general partner and the sole limited partner and (b) 84,900 shares held by the Foundation. Fanny Hanono and Salomon Hanono are husband and wife. (6) Also includes 16,250 shares of Common Stock issuable upon the exercise of stock options held by Mr. Hanono. (7) The shares of Common Stock held by Carfel are pledged to a bank to secure Carfel's credit facility. (8) Represents (a) 1,500 shares of Common Stock held by Mr. Roisman and (b) 11,250 shares of Common Stock issuable upon the exercise of stock options held by Mr. Roisman. (9) Represents (a) 750 shares of Common Stock held by Mr. Buch and (b) 5,000 shares of Common Stock issuable upon the exercise of stock options held by Mr. Buch. (10) Represents (a) 3,000 shares of Common Stock held by Mr. Dix, (b) 1,800 shares of Common Stock held in trust for his children, (c) 750 shares held in an individual retirement account and (d) 16,250 shares of Common Stock issuable upon the exercise of stock options held by Mr. Dix. (11) Represents (a) 2,250 shares of Common Stock held by Mr. McEwen and (b) 12,500 shares of Common Stock issuable upon the exercise of stock options held by Mr. McEwen. (12) Represents (a) 39,000 shares of Common Stock held by Mr. Miller and (b) 16,250 shares of Common Stock issuable upon the exercise of stock options held by Mr. Miller. (13) Based solely on information contained in an amendment to Schedule 13G dated December 30, 1998 filed with the Commission. 380,000 of these shares of Common Stock are owned by Fidelity Capital Appreciation Fund, a wholly-owned subsidiary of FMR Corporation. (14) Based solely on information contained in Schedule 13G dated December 31, 1996 filed with the Commission. (15) Includes the shares of Common Stock and options to purchase shares of Common Stock described in Notes (3) through (6) and (8) through (12). 31 In connection with the pending John Henry/Manhattan acquisition, we granted IAC in April 1998 the right to purchase 1,320,000 shares of Supreme common stock at a price of $12 per share, representing approximately 16.4% of our outstanding common stock as of January 31, 1999. This right is exercisable upon the consummation of the John Henry/Manhattan acquisition. ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS. LEASE AGREEMENTS See "Business--Facilities" with respect to certain facilities leased jointly by Supreme and Carfel. Prior to the consolidation of our administrative offices and warehouse and distribution facilities, we occupied the following properties from affiliated parties. We lease an approximately 16,900 square foot building in Miami, Florida which housed our executive offices. The space is leased from George Feldenkreis, the Company's Chairman of the Board, pursuant to a lease which expires in December 2000. The annual rental for the office facility is approximately $128,000. Supreme will continue to pay rent on this facility until the expiration of the lease or until the lease of the facility to another party. We also leased an approximately 49,000 square foot warehouse/office building adjacent to our former executive offices from George Feldenkreis pursuant to a lease which expired in April 1998. Fiscal 1999 rental for this facility was approximately $282,000. In January 1999, we vacated this building. We also lease an approximately 32,000 square foot warehouse building from a partnership of which Mr. Feldenkreis is a general partner. This warehouse was leased pursuant to a lease which expired in June 1998. Fiscal 1999 rental for this facility was approximately $136,000. This facility is currently being leased on a month-to-month basis for a monthly rental of $11,333. LICENSING AGREEMENTS In January 1995, we entered into a license agreement ("Isaco License Agreement") with Isaco International, Inc. ("Isaco"), pursuant to which Isaco was granted an exclusive license to use the Natural Issue brand in the United States and its territories and possessions to market a line of men's underwear and loungewear. In June 1998, Supreme and Isaco extended the Isaco License Agreement for an additional year at a guaranteed minimum royalty of $137,500. Royalty income earned from Isaco License Agreement amounted to approximately $298,000, $296,000 and $243,000 for fiscal 1999, 1998 and 1997, respectively. The principal shareholder of Isaco is Isaac Zelcer, who is Oscar Feldenkreis' father-in-law. In January 1998, we entered into two additional three-year license agreements with Isaco for use of the Natural Issue brand in the United States and its territories and possessions to market lines of hosiery and neckwear. The license agreement for neckwear provides for a guaranteed minimum annual royalty of $15,000 and the license agreement for hosiery provides for a guaranteed minimum annual royalty of $25,000 during the first year, increasing by $5,000 in each subsequent year. The Company believes that its arrangements with George Feldenkreis, Carfel and Isaco are on terms at least as favorable as the Company could secure from a non-affiliated third party. 32 PART IV ITEMItem 14. EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES AND REPORTS ON FORMExhibits, Financial Statement Schedules and Reports on Form 8-K (a) Documents filed as part of this report (1) Financial Statements. (1)Consolidated Financial Statements. The following consolidated financial statementsConsolidated Financial Statements of SupremePerry Ellis International, CorporationInc. and subsidiaries are included in Part II, Item 8: PAGE ----- Independent Auditors' Report ........................................ F-1 Consolidated Balance Sheets as of January 31, 1998 and 1999 ......... F-2 Consolidated Statements of Income For Each of the Three Years in the Period Ended January 31, 1999 .... F-3 Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders' Equity For Each of the Three Years in the Period Ended January 31, 1999 .... F-4 Consolidated Statements of Cash Flow For Each of the Three Years in the Period Ended January 31, 1999 .... F-5 Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements .......................... F-6 The following financial statements of Perry Ellis International, Inc. are included in Part II, Item 8: PAGE ----- Independent Auditors' Report ........................................ F-21 Balance Sheet as of December 31, 1997 and 1998 ...................... F-22 Statement of Operations for the years ended December 31, 1996, 1997 and 1998 ................................... F-23 Undistributed Income for the years ended December 31, 1996, 1997 and 1998 ................................... F-24 Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, 1996, 1997 and 1998 ................................... F-25 Notes to Financial Statements ....................................... F-26 The following Unaudited Pro Forma Combined Financial Information of Supreme and Perry Ellis International, Inc. are included in Part II, Item 8: PAGE ----- Introduction ........................................................ F-29 Balance Sheet as of January 31, 1999 ................................ F-30 Income Statement for the year ended January 31, 1999 ................ F-31 Notes to Unaudited Pro Forma Combined Financial Information ......... F-32
Page Independent Auditors' Report F-2 Consolidated Balance Sheets as of January 31, 2002 and 2001 F-3 Consolidated Statements of Income for each of the three years in the period ended January 31, 2002 F-4 Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders' Equity for each of the three years in the period ended January 31, 2002 F-5 Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for each of the three years in the period ended January 31, 2002 F-6 Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements F-7 (2) Consolidated Financial Statement Schedule
All schedules for which provision is made in applicable regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission are not required under the related instructions, are inapplicable or the required information have been included in the Consolidated Financial Statements and therefore such schedules have been omitted. 33 (3) Exhibits
EXHIBIT NO. DESCRIPTION OF EXHIBIT - -------- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 3.1 Registrant's Second Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation(6) 3.2 Registrant's Amended and Restated Bylaws(1) 4.1 Form of Common Stock Certificate(1) 10.3 Form of Indemnification Agreement between the Registrant and each of the Registrant's Directors and Officers(1) 10.6 Business Lease dated October 4, 1990, between George Feldenkreis and the Registrant relating to warehouse facilities(1) 10.7 Business Lease dated May 1, 1990, between George Feldenkreis and the Registrant relating to warehouse facilities(1) 10.9 1993 Stock Option Plan (1)(2) 10.10 Directors Stock Option(1)(2) 10.15 Loan and Security Agreement dated as of October 5, 1994, between the Registrant and NationsBank 10.16 First Amendment to Loan and Security Agreement dated as of August 19, 1995, between the Registrant and NationsBank of George N.A.(4) 10.17 Amendment to Business Lease between George Feldenkreis and the Registrant relating to office facilities(4) 10.18 Revocable Credit Facility Agreement dated May 26, 1995 between the Registrant and Hamilton Bank, N.A.(4) 10.19 Revolving Line of Credit Agreement dated June 23, 1995 between the Registrant and Ocean Bank(4) 10.20 Profit Sharing Plan(2)(4) 10.21 Amended and Restated Employment Agreement between the Registrant and George Feldenkreis(2)(4) 10.22 Amended and Restated Employment Agreement between the Registrant and Oscar Feldenkreis(2)(4) 10.23 Business Lease dated December 26, 1995 between George Feldenkreis and the Registrant relating to office facilities(5) 10.24 Lease Agreement [Land] dated as of August 28, 1997 between SUP Joint Venture, as Lessor and Registrant, as Lessee(7) 10.25 Lease Agreement [Building] dated as of August 28, 1997 between SUP Joint Venture, as Lessor and Registrant, as Lessee(7) 10.26 Amended and Restated Loan and Security Agreement dated as of March 31, 1998(7) 10.27 Amendment to Amended and Restated Loan and Security Agreement dated as of August 1, 1998(6) 22.1 Subsidiaries of Registrant(3) 23.2 Consent of Deloitte & Touche LLP(6) 27.1 Financial Data Schedule (SEC use only)Exhibit No. Description of Exhibit - ------- ---------------------- 3.1 Registrant's Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation (1) 3.2 Registrant's Amended and Restated Bylaws (1) 4.1 Form of Common Stock Certificate (1) 4.2 Indenture dated April 6, 1999 between the Company and State Street Bank and Trust Company, as amended (6)
- ----------------4.4 Purchase Agreement dated March 31, 1999 by and among the Company and the Initial Purchasers (6) 4.5 Specimen Forms of 121/4% Senior Subordinated Notes due April 1, 2006 (6) 4.6 Indenture dated March 22, 2002 between the Company and State Street Bank and Trust Company (11) 4.7 Purchase Agreement dated March 15, 2002 by and among the Company and the Initial Purchaser (11) 4.8 Pledge and Security Agreement dated March 22, 2002 by and among the Company, Jantzen Apparel Corp. and State Street Bank and Trust Company (11) 4.9 Specimen Forms of 9 1/2% Senior Secured Notes due March 15, 2009 (11) 10.3 Form of Indemnification Agreement between the Company and each of the Company's Directors and Officers (1) 10.9 1993 Stock Option Plan (1)(2) 10.10 Directors Stock Option (1)(2) 31 10.17 Amendment to Business Lease between George Feldenkreis and the Company relating to office facilities (4) 10.18 Revocable Credit Facility Agreement dated May 26, 1995 between the Company and Hamilton Bank, N.A. (4) 10.19 Revolving Line of Credit Agreement dated June 23, 1995 between the Company and Ocean Bank (4) 10.20 Profit Sharing Plan (2)(4) 10.21 Amended and Restated Employment Agreement between the Company and George Feldenkreis (2)(4) 10.22 Amended and Restated Employment Agreement between the Company and Oscar Feldenkreis (2)(4) 10.24 Lease Agreement [Land] dated as of August 28, 1997 between SUP Joint Venture, as Lessor and Registrant, as Lessee (6) 10.25 Lease Agreement [Building] dated as of August 28, 1997 between SUP Joint Venture, as Lessor and the Company, as Lessee (6) 10.26 Amended and Restated Loan and Security Agreement dated as of March 31, 1998 (6) 10.27 Amendment to Amended and Restated Loan and Security Agreement dated as of August 1, 1998 (7) 10.28 Purchase and Sale Agreement dated as of December 28, 1998 among Salant Corporation, Frost Bros. Enterprises, Inc., Maquiladora Sur, S.A. de C.V. and the Company (the "Salant Purchase Sale Agreement") (7) 10.29 First Amendment to the Salant Purchase and Sale Agreement dated as of February 24, 1999 (7) 10.30 Amended and Restated Loan and Security Agreement dated as of March 26, 1999 (7) 10.31 Inventory Purchase Agreement dated March 12, 1999 between the Company and Phillips-Van Heusen Corporation (7) 10.32 Stock Purchase Agreement dated as of January 28, 1999 by and among the Company and Christopher C. Angell, Barbara Gallagher and Morgan Guaranty Trust Company of New York, as Trustees of the PEI Trust created under Par. E. of Article 3 of the Agreement dated November 19, 1985, as amended January 27, 1986 (the "Perry Ellis Purchase and Sale Agreement") (8) 10.33 First Amendment to the Perry Ellis Purchase and Sale Agreement dated as of March 31, 1999 (8) 10.34 Employment Agreement between Allan Zwerner and the Company (2)(6) 10.35 Employment Agreement between Timothy B. Page and the Company (2)(11) 10.36 Incentive Stock Option Plan (2)(9) 10.37 Asset Purchase Agreement dated as of March 15, 2002 by and among the Company, Jantzen, Inc. and VF Canada, Inc. (11) 10.38 Fifth Amendment dated March 14, 2002 to Amended and Restated Loan and Security Agreement dated March 26, 1999 (11) 10.39 Fourth Amendment to Master Agreement dated March 14, 2002, by and among the Company, SUP Joint Venture, SunTrust Bank and Israeli Discount Bank (11) 21.1 Subsidiaries of Registrant (11) 23.2 Consent of Deloitte & Touche LLP (11) ____________________ (1) Previously filed as an Exhibit of the same number to Registrant's Registration Statement on Form S -1 (File No. 33-60750) and incorporated herein by reference. (2) Management Contract or Compensation Plan. (3) Previously filed as an Exhibit of the same number to Registrant's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended January 31, 1995 and incorporated herein by reference. (4) Previously files as an Exhibit of the same number to Registrant's Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File No. 33-96304) and incorporated herein by reference. (5) Previously filed as an Exhibit of the same number to Registrant's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended January 31, 1996 and incorporated herein by reference. (6) Filed herewith.Previously filed as an Exhibit to Registrant's Registration Statement on Form S-4 (File No. 33-78427) and incorporated herein by reference. 32 (7) Previously filed as an exhibit of the same numberExhibit to Registrant's AnnualCurrent Report on Form 10-K for the year ended January 31, 19978-K dated March 29, 1999 as amended and incorporated herein by reference. 34 (8) Previously filed as an Exhibit to Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K dated April 6, 1999 as amended and incorporated herein by reference. (9) Previously filed as an Exhibit to Registrant's Proxy Statement for its 2000 Annual Meeting and incorporated herein by reference. (10) Previously filed as an Exhibit to Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K dated March 22, 2002 and incorporated herein by reference. (11) Filed herewith. (b) Reports on Form 8-K On January 15, 1999 Supreme filed a current report on Form 8-K to disclose that it had entered into a definitive agreement with respect to the John Henry/Manhattan acquisition.None. (c) Item 601 Exhibits The exhibits required by Item 601 of Regulation S-K are set forth in (a)(3) above. (d) Financial Statement Schedules The financial statement schedules required by Regulation S-K are set forth in (a)(2) above. 3533 SIGNATURES Pursuant to the requirement of Section 12 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has caused this report or amendment to thereto to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized. SUPREMEPERRY ELLIS INTERNATIONAL, CORPORATION By:INC. Dated: April 19, 2002 BY: /s/ GEORGE FELDENKREIS By: /s/ GEORGE FELDENKREIS ------------------------------------------------------------------------- George Feldenkreis Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer Dated: March 15, 1999 Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons in thetheir capacities and on the date indicated:
NAME AND SIGNATURE TITLE DATE - -------------------------------- ------------------------------------- ---------------Name and Signature Title Date ------------------ ----- ---- /s/ GEORGE FELDENKREIS Chairman of the Board and March 15, 1999April 19, 2002 - --------------------------------------------------------- Chief Executive Officer George Feldenkreis (Principal Executive Financial) and Accounting Officer) /s/ OSCAR FELDENKREIS President, Chief OperationsOperating April 19, 2002 - ------------------------- Officer March 15, 1999 - -------------------------------- and Director Oscar Feldenkreis /s/ TIMOTHY B. PAGE Chief Financial Officer April 19, 2002 - ------------------------- (Principal Financial and Accounting Timothy B. Page Officer) /s/ ALLAN ZWERNER President of Licensing April 19, 2002 - ------------------------- and Director Allan Zwerner /s/ RONALD BUCH Director March 15, 1999April 19, 2002 - --------------------------------------------------------- Ronald Buch /s/ GARY DIX Director March 15, 1999April 19, 2002 - --------------------------------------------------------- Gary Dix /s/ SALOMON HANONO Director March 15, 1999April 19, 2002 - --------------------------------------------------------- Salomon Hanono /s/ RICHARD McEWENJOSEPH P. LACHER Director March 15, 1999April 19, 2002 - -------------------------------- Richard McEwen------------------------- Joseph P. Lacher /s/ LEONARD MILLER Director March 15, 1999April 19, 2002 - --------------------------------------------------------- Leonard Miller
3634 INDEX TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS PERRY ELLIS INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES Independent Auditors' Report F-2 Consolidated Balance Sheets as of January 31, 2002 and 2001 F-3 Consolidated Statements of Income for each of the three years in the period ended January 31, 2002 F-4 Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders' Equity for each of the three years in the period ended January 31, 2002 F-5 Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for each of the three years in the period ended January 31, 2002 F-6 Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements F-7
F-1 INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of SupremePerry Ellis International, Corporation and subsidiaries:Inc.: We have audited the consolidated balance sheets of SupremePerry Ellis International, CorporationInc. and subsidiaries (the "Company") as of January 31, 19982002 and 1999,2001, and the related consolidated statements of income,operations, changes in stockholders' equity and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended January 31, 1999.2002. These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audits. We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted auditing standards.in the United States of America. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion. In our opinion, such consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of January 31, 19982002 and 1999,2001, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended January 31, 19992002 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted accounting principles.in the United States of America. /s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP Certified Public Accountants Miami, Florida March 12, 1999 F-119, 2002, except for Note 20, As to which the date is March 22, 2002 F-2 SUPREMEPERRY ELLIS INTERNATIONAL, CORPORATIONINC. AND SUBSIDIARIES CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AS OF JANUARY 31, 1998 AND 1999
1998 1999 --------------- ---------------2001 2002 ------------ ------------- ASSETS Current Assets: Cash .............................................................and cash equivalents $ 1,010,256344,741 $ 173,4931,303,978 Accounts receivable, net ......................................... 35,502,607 38,969,84558,821,622 50,370,245 Inventories ...................................................... 35,799,388 32,965,65543,556,374 45,409,047 Deferred income taxes ............................................ 1,154,905 1,091,482 Deposits for acquisitions ........................................ -- 6,000,0001,951,553 2,384,316 Prepaid income taxes 136,718 - Other current assets ............................................. 2,253,328 2,040,2002,305,283 1,886,163 ------------ ------------ Total current assets ........................................... 75,720,484 81,240,675107,116,291 101,353,749 Property and equipment, net ....................................... 4,899,656 7,851,5929,820,628 10,897,334 Intangible assets, net ............................................ 19,716,064 18,842,797122,016,681 117,938,894 Other ............................................................. 1,313,747 1,022,4674,159,482 3,870,703 ------------ ------------ TOTAL .......................................................... $101,649,951 $108,957,531$243,113,082 $234,060,680 ============ ============ LIABILITIES AND& STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY Current Liabilities: Accounts payable ................................................. $ 4,048,3256,712,859 $ 4,595,6885,966,368 Accrued expenses ................................................. 2,062,912 4,931,525 Borrowings under letter of3,660,364 3,259,602 Income taxes payable - 1,381,551 Accrued interest payable 4,215,835 3,808,997 Current portion - senior credit facilities ..................... 3,000,000 --agreement - 21,756,094 Unearned revenues 1,996,752 1,838,929 Other current liabilities ........................................ 442,790 413,5051,651,467 2,410,583 ------------ ------------ Total current liabilities ...................................... 9,554,027 9,940,71818,237,277 40,422,124 Senior subordinated notes payable, net 99,152,667 99,071,515 Deferred income tax ............................................... 282,905 559,7284,930,829 6,749,832 Long term debt--seniordebt- senior credit agreement ........................... 36,658,174 33,511,15737,913,126 - ------------ ------------ Total long-term liabilities 141,996,622 105,821,347 ------------ ------------ Total liabilities .............................................. 46,495,106 44,011,603160,233,899 146,243,471 ------------ ------------ Commitments and Contingencies:Contingencies (Note 16)19) Minority Interest - 613,671 ------------ ------------ Stockholders' Equity: Preferred stock--$.01stock $.01 par value; 1,000,000 shares authorized; no shares issued or outstanding ................................. -- --- - Class A Common Stock--$.01common stock $.01 par value; 30,000,000 shares authorized; no shares issued or outstanding ................................. -- --- - Common stock--$.01stock $.01 par value; 30,000,000 shares authorized; 6,555,681 and 6,712,3746,739,374 shares issued and 6,579,374 shares outstanding as of January 31, 19982001 and 1999, respectively ................... 65,556 67,1236,337,440 shares issued and 6,286,740 shares outstanding as of January 31, 2002 67,393 63,374 Additional paid-in-capital ........................................ 27,598,618 28,806,45529,063,407 26,286,040 Retained earnings ................................................. 27,490,671 36,072,35054,778,302 61,386,244 Accumulated other comprehensive income - (121,753) ------------ ------------ Total 83,909,102 87,613,905 Common stock in treasury at cost; 160,000 shares as of January 31, 2001 and 50,700 shares as of January 31, 2002 (1,029,919) (410,367) ------------ ------------ Total stockholders' equity ..................................... 55,154,845 64,945,92882,879,183 87,203,538 ------------ ------------ TOTAL .......................................................... $101,649,951 $108,957,531$243,113,082 $234,060,680 ============ ============
See Notesnotes to consolidated financial statements. F-2F-3 SUPREMEPERRY ELLIS INTERNATIONAL, CORPORATIONINC. AND SUBSIDIARIES CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME FOR EACH OF THE THREE YEARS IN THE PERIOD ENDED JANUARY 31 1999
1997 1998 1999 ----------------- ----------------- -----------------2000 2001 2002 ------------- ------------ ------------ Revenues Net Sales ........................................... $ 157,372,796 $ 190,689,212 $ 221,347,295$229,549,158 $261,626,463 $253,033,752 Royalty Income ...................................... 1,654,262 4,031,878 3,057,357 ------------- ------------- -------------22,839,698 25,789,975 26,680,987 ------------ ------------ ------------ Total Revenues ..................................... 159,027,058 194,721,090 224,404,652252,388,856 287,416,438 279,714,739 Cost of Sales ........................................ 122,045,614 145,991,132 166,198,450 ------------- ------------- -------------171,412,946 200,883,860 191,601,211 ------------ ------------ ------------ Gross Profit ......................................... 36,981,444 48,729,958 58,206,20280,975,910 86,532,578 88,113,528 Operating Expenses Selling, General and Administrative Expenses ......... 25,876,115 35,885,443 41,639,672 ------------- ------------- -------------44,479,497 52,146,750 57,170,447 Depreciation and Amortization 5,181,286 6,130,708 6,662,158 ------------ ------------ ------------ Total Operating Expenses 49,660,783 58,277,458 63,832,605 ------------ ------------ ------------ Operating Income ..................................... 11,105,329 12,844,515 16,566,53031,315,127 28,255,120 24,280,923 Interest Expense ..................................... 1,664,392 2,781,509 3,493,985 ------------- ------------- -------------13,905,498 15,766,461 13,549,746 ------------ ------------ ------------ Income Before Minority Interest and Income Tax Provision ................... 9,440,937 10,063,006 13,072,54517,409,629 12,488,659 10,731,177 Minority Interest - - 83,240 Income Tax Provision ................................. 3,596,918 2,884,844 4,490,866 ------------- ------------- -------------6,529,681 4,662,655 4,039,995 ------------ ------------ ------------ Net Income ........................................... $ 5,844,01910,879,948 $ 7,178,1627,826,004 $ 8,581,679 ============= ============= =============6,607,942 ============ ============ ============ Net Income Perper Share Basic ............................................... $ 0.891.62 $ 1.101.17 $ 1.29 ============= ============= =============1.01 ============ ============ ============ Diluted ............................................. $ 0.891.59 $ 1.081.16 $ 1.27 ============= ============= =============1.01 ============ ============ ============ Weighted Average Number of Shares Outstanding Basic ............................................... 6,534,446 6,540,604 6,674,103 ============= ============= =============6,725,722 6,689,476 6,516,807 Diluted ............................................. 6,595,147 6,665,635 6,769,810 ============= ============= =============6,856,538 6,745,441 6,534,749
See Notesnotes to consolidated financial statements. F-3F-4 SUPREMEPERRY ELLIS INTERNATIONAL, CORPORATIONINC. AND SUBSIDIARIES CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY FOR EACH OF THE THREE YEARS IN THE PERIOD ENDED JANUARY 31 1999
ACCUMULATED OTHER ADDITIONAL COMPRE- COMPRE- COMMON STOCK ADDITIONAL -------------------------- PAID-IN TREASURY HENSIVE HENSIVE RETAINED ---------------------- SHARES AMOUNT CAPITAL STOCK INCOME INCOME EARNINGS TOTAL --------- --------- ----------- ----------- ------------- ---------- -------------- -------------- -------------------------- ------------ BALANCE, JANUARY 31, 1996 ................... 6,800,0001999 6,712,374 $ 68,00067,123 $28,806,455 $ 29,296,594 $14,468,490- $ 43,833,084 Purchase of treasury stock, at cost ......... (278,069) (2,780) (1,947,599) -- (1,950,379)- $ - $ 36,072,350 $64,945,928 Exercise of stock options ................... 7,500 75 48,675 -- 48,750 Net Income .................................. -- -- -- 5,844,019 5,844,019 --------- -------- ------------ ----------- ------------ BALANCE, JANUARY 31, 1997 ................... 6,529,431 65,295 27,397,670 20,312,509 47,775,474 Exercise of stock options ................... 26,250 261 200,948 -- 201,209 Net Income .................................. -- -- -- 7,178,162 7,178,162 --------- -------- ------------ ----------- ------------ BALANCE, JANUARY 31, 1998 ................... 6,555,681 65,556 27,598,618 27,490,671 55,154,845 Exercise of stock options ................... 78,525 785 457,367 -- 458,15219,500 195 163,333 - - - - 163,528 Exercise of warrants ........................ 78,168 782 (782) -- --- - - - - - - - Net Income .................................. -- -- -- 8,581,679 8,581,679income - - - - - - 10,879,948 10,879,948 Tax benefit for exercise of non-qualified stock options ............... -- -- 751,252 -- 751,252- - 30,867 - - - - 30,867 ----------- --------- -------- ------------ ----------- ---------------------- ----------- ---------- ----------- ----------- BALANCE, JANUARY 31, 1999 ................... 6,712,3742000 6,731,874 67,318 29,000,655 - - - 46,952,298 76,020,271 Exercise of stock options 7,500 75 57,425 - - - - 57,500 Net income - - - - - - 7,826,004 7,826,004 Tax benefit for exercise of non-qualified stock options - - 5,327 - - - - 5,327 Purchase of treasury stock (160,000) (1,029,919) - - - (1,029,919) ----------- --------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ---------- ----------- ----------- BALANCE, JANUARY 31, 2001 6,579,374 67,393 29,063,407 (1,029,919) - - 54,778,302 82,879,183 Exercise of stock options 2,666 27 15,395 - - - - 15,422 Net income - - - - - 6,607,942 6,607,942 6,607,942 Foreign currency translation adjustment - - - - (121,753) (121,753) - (121,753) ----------- Comprehensive income $ 67,1236,486,189 =========== Tax benefit for exercise of non-qualified stock options - - - - - - -- Purchase of treasury stock (295,300) - - (2,177,256) - - (2,177,256) Retirement of treasury stock (4,046) (2,792,762) 2,796,808 - - - ----------- --------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- BALANCE, JANUARY 31, 2002 6,286,740 $ 28,806,455 $36,072,35063,374 $26,286,040 $ 64,945,928(410,367) $ (121,753) $61,386,243 $87,203,538 =========== ========= ======== ============ =========== ======================= =========== =========== ===========
See Notesnotes to consolidated financial statements. F-4F-5 SUPREMEPERRY ELLIS INTERNATIONAL, CORPORATIONSINC. AND SUBSIDIARIES CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWFLOWS FOR EACH OF THE THREE YEARS IN THE PERIOD ENDED JANUARY 31 1999
1997 1998 1999 --------------- --------------- ---------------2000 2001 2002 -------------- ------------ ------------ CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES: Net income ...................................................... $ 5,844,01910,879,948 $ 7,178,1627,826,004 $ 8,581,6796,607,942 Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by (used in) provided by operating activities: Depreciation and amortization .................................. 1,147,091 1,748,006 2,161,398 Loss on sale and abandonment of property ....................... 257,221 187,692 -- Decrease (increase) in5,181,286 5,521,762 6,190,801 Provision for bad debts 450,541 330,435 1,575,000 Provision for deferred taxes .......................... 159,655 (203,342) 340,2461,412,735 2,098,295 1,386,240 Amortization of debt issue cost 299,711 608,946 614,347 Amortization of bond discount 136,667 164,000 164,000 Minority Interest - - 83,240 Other 32,758 67,234 (64,250) Changes in operating assets and liabilities:liabilities (net of effects of acquisition)acquisitions): Accounts receivable, net ...................................... (8,951,318) (6,695,371) (3,467,238)(6,662,205) (13,174,087) 7,048,510 Inventories ................................................... 293,527 (3,598,866) 2,833,733(3,037,630) (7,579,495) (1,528,619) Other current assets .......................................... (359,942) (727,633) 213,128and prepaid income taxes (1,291,628) 1,728,313 586,446 Other assets .................................................. (1,915,477) 889,854 291,280509,924 (265,952) (701,044) Accounts payable and accrued expenses ......................... 4,835,234 (1,907,414) 3,415,9761,686,981 603,704 (1,160,561) Income taxes payable - - 1,385,210 Accrued interest payable 4,233,183 (194,796) (604,768) Other current liabilities ..................................... 563,756 28,055 (29,285)and unearned revenues 214,260 153,951 792,354 ------------- ------------ ------------------------- Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities ..................................... 1,873,766 (3,100,857) 14,340,91714,046,531 (2,111,686) 22,374,847 ------------- ------------ ------------------------- CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES: Purchase of property and equipment .............................. (1,058,061) (3,828,142) (4,004,588) Proceeds from sale of property and equipment .................... 164,545 32,102 --(2,331,513) (2,711,741) (2,921,930) Payment on purchase of intangible assets ........................ (137,027) (758,598) (235,479) Deposit for John Henry/Manhattan acquisition .................... -- -- (1,000,000) Deposit for Perry Ellis International acquisition ............... -- -- (5,000,000)(1,025,185) (3,472,001) (98,928) Proceeds from sale of trademark - 750,000 - Payment for Jolem acquisition ................................... (3,657,435) -- -- Payment for Munsingwear acquisition ............................. (19,768,380) -- --acquired businesses, net of cash acquired (100,734,467) - - ------------- ------------ ------------------------- Net cash used in(used in) investing activities ........................ (24,456,358) (4,554,638) (10,240,067)activities: (104,091,165) (5,433,742) (3,020,858) ------------- ------------ ------------------------- CASH FLOWFLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES: Net increase (decrease)borrowings (repayments) in borrowings under letter ofterm loan 11,250,000 (11,250,000) - Net (payments) proceeds from senior credit facilities ............................................. 6,812,629 (3,812,629) (3,000,000)facility (15,479,661) 19,881,630 (16,157,032) Net proceeds from (repayments of) long-term debt ................ 18,168,857 11,521,373 (3,147,017) Purchase of treasury stock ...................................... (1,950,379) -- --senior subordinated notes 98,852,000 - - Debt issuance costs (4,719,962) - - Tax benefit for exercise of non-qualified stock options ......... -- -- 751,25230,867 5,327 - Purchase of treasury stock - (1,029,919) (2,177,256) Proceeds from exercise of stock options ......................... 48,750 201,209 458,152163,528 57,500 15,421 ------------- ------------ ------------------------- Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities .......... 23,079,857 7,909,953 (4,937,613)activities: 90,096,772 7,664,538 (18,318,867) ------------- ------------ ------------ Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents - - (75,886) ------------- ------------ ------------ NET INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH ................................. 497,265 254,458 (836,763)52,138 119,110 959,237 CASH AT BEGINNING OF YEAR ....................................... 258,533 755,798 1,010,256173,493 225,631 344,741 ------------- ------------ ------------------------- CASH AT END OF YEAR ............................................. $ 755,798225,631 $ 1,010,256344,741 $ 173,4931,303,978 ============= ============ ========================= SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE OF CASH FLOW INFORMATIONINFORMATION: Cash paid during the yearperiod for: Interest ....................................................... $ 1,433,4039,672,315 $ 2,820,01615,961,257 $ 3,293,87714,028,640 ============= ============ ========================= Income taxes ................................................... $ 3,394,4668,556,537 $ 3,174,807750,000 $ 1,762,4791,608,192 ============= ============ ============ NON-CASH FINANCING AND INVESTING ACTIVITIES: Change in fair value of Mark-to-Market interest rate swap/option $ - $ - $ (245,152) ============= ============ ============
See Notesnotes to consolidated financial statements. F-5F-6 SUPREMEPERRY ELLIS INTERNATIONAL, CORPORATIONINC. AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR EACH OF THE THREE YEARS IN THE PERIOD ENDED JANUARY 31, 19992002 1. GENERAL Supreme International Corporation and subsidiaries (the "Company") was incorporated in the State of Florida and has been in business since 1967.General The Company is a leading licensor, designer and marketer of a broad line of high quality men's sportswear, including sport and dress shirts, golf sportswear, sweaters urban wear,and casual and dress pants and shorts, which sells to all levels of retail distribution. The Company licenses its trademark portfolio domestically and internationally for apparel and other products that it does not sell including dress sportswear, outerwear, fragrances and accessories. The Company has built a broad portfolio of brands through selective acquisitions and the establishment of its own brands over its 35-year operating history. The Company's distribution channels include regional, national and international upscale department stores, mid-tier department stores, chain stores, mass merchants, specialty stores and corporate wear distributors throughout the United States, Puerto Rico and Canada. 2. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIESSummary of Significant Accounting Policies The following is a summary of the Company's significant accounting policies: PRINCIPLES OF CONSOLIDATION--TheCONSOLIDATION- The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of SupremePerry Ellis International, CorporationInc., its wholly owned subsidiaries and its wholly-owned subsidiaries.an entity in which the Company has a controlling interest. The ownership interest of the noncontrolling owner in such entity is reflected as minority interest. All intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated in consolidation. USE OF ESTIMATES--TheESTIMATES - The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted accounting principlesin the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts in the consolidated financial statements and the accompanying notes. Actual results could differ from those estimates. FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS--TheINSTRUMENTS - The carrying amounts of accounts receivable and accounts payable approximates fair value due to their short-term nature. The carrying amount of debt andthe senior credit facilities approximatefacility approximates fair value due to their statedthe relatively frequent resets of its floating interest rate approximating arate. The fair value of the 12 1/4% senior subordinated notes is approximately $104.0 million, based on quoted market rate.prices. These estimated fair value amounts have been determined using available market information or other appropriate valuation methodologies. INVENTORIES--InventoriesCASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS - The Company considers all highly liquid investments purchased with an original maturity of three months or less to be cash equivalents. Due to the short maturity period of cash equivalents, the carrying amount of these instruments approximates fair value. INVENTORIES - Inventories are stated at the lower of cost (first-in, first-outfirst- out basis) or market. Costs consistCost consists of the purchase price, customs, duties, freight, insurance and commissions to buying agents. PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT--PropertyEQUIPMENT - Property and equipment are stated at cost. Depreciation is computed using the straight-line and accelerated methodsmethod over the estimated useful lives of the assets. Amortization of leasehold improvements is computed using the straight-line method over the shorter of the lease term or estimated useful lives of the improvements. The useful lives per asset class range from five to ten years.as follows: F-7
Avg. Useful Asset Class Lives in Years ---------------------------------- -------------------- Furniture, fixtures and equipment 7 Vehicles 7 Leasehold Improvements 11
INTANGIBLE ASSETS--IntangibleASSETS - Intangible assets primarily represent costs capitalized in connection with the acquisition,acquisitions, registration and maintenanceprotection of brand names and license rights. The amortization periods for the intangible assetsIntangibles are amortized over their estimated useful lives, which range from fifteeneight to twentyforty years with a weighted average of nineteen31.7 years.
Avg. Useful Asset Class Lives in Years -------------------------------- ---------------- Trademarks and Licensing Rights 15 - 40 Legal Costs 8 Goodwill 15
DEFERRED DEBT ISSUE COSTS - Costs incurred in connection with the financing are capitalized and amortized on a half years. LONG LIVED-ASSETS--Managementstraight-line basis, which approximates the interest method, over the term of the related financing. Such amounts are included in other long-term assets in the consolidated balance sheet. LONG-LIVED ASSETS - Management reviews long-lived assets, including identifiable intangible assets, for possible impairment whenever events or circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. If there is an indication of impairment, management prepares an estimate of future cash flows (undiscounted and without interest charges) expected to result from the use of the asset and its eventual disposition. If these cash flows are less than the carrying amount of the asset, an impairment loss is recognized to reduce the asset to its estimated fair value. Preparation of estimated expected future cash flows is inherently subjective and is based on management's best F-6 SUPREME INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(CONTINUED) FOR EACH OF THE THREE YEARS IN THE PERIOD ENDED JANUARY 31, 1999 2. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES--(CONTINUED) estimate of assumptions concerning future conditions. At January 31, 1999,2002, management believes there was no impairementsignificant impairment to long-lived assets. ADVERTISING AND RELATED COSTS - The Company's accounting policy relating to advertising and related costs is to expense these costs in the period incurred. Advertising and related costs were $7.1 million, $8.2 million and $7.7 million for the years ended January 31, 2000, 2001 and 2002, respectively. REVENUE RECOGNITION--SalesRECOGNITION - Sales are recognized upon shipment, returns for defective goods are netted against sales,transfer of legal title and an allowance is providedrisk of loss to the customer (at shipment), net of trade allowances and a provision for estimated returns and other chargebacks.allowances. Royalty income is recognized when earned on the basis of the terms specified in the underlying contractual agreements. Royalties collected prior to being earned are deferred and recognized as earned. The Company believes that its revenue recognition policies conform to Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 101, Revenue Recognition in Financial Statements. The Company operates predominantly in North America, with over 90% of its sales in the domestic market. One customer accounted for approximately 14% of net sales for fiscal year 2000; two customers accounted for approximately 14% and 11% of net sales for fiscal year 2001; and three customers accounted for approximately 12%, 11% and 11% of net sales for fiscal year 2002. The Company does not believe that these concentrations of sales and credit risk represent a material risk of loss with respect to its financial position as of January 31, 2002. FOREIGN CURRENCY TRANSLATION - For the Company's international operations, local currencies are considered their functional currencies. The Company translates assets and liabilities to their F-8 U.S. dollar equivalents at rates in effect at the balance sheet date and revenue and expenses are translated at average monthly exchange rates. Translation adjustments resulting from this process are recorded in Stockholders' Equity as a component of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income. INCOME TAXES--DeferredTAXES - Deferred income taxes result primarily from timing differences in the recognition of expenses for tax and financial reporting purposes and are accounted for in accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board Statement ("SFAS") No. 109, ("SFAS No. 109"), Accounting for Income Taxes, which requires the asset and liability method of computing deferred income taxes. Under the asset and liability method, deferred taxes are adjusted for tax rate changes as they occur. NET INCOME PER SHARE--BasicSHARE - Basic net income per share is computed by dividing net income by the weighted average shares of outstanding common stock. The calculation of diluted net income per share is similar to basic earnings per share except that the denominator includes potential dilutive potential common stock. The potential dilutive potential common stock included in the Company's computation of diluted net income per share includes the effects of the stock options and warrants described in Note 14,17, as determined using the treasury stock method. The weighted average numbereffect of these dilutive securities amounted to 17,942 shares for stock options included in the dilutive weighted average2002, 55,956 shares outstanding were 60,701, 125,031in 2001 and 95,707130,816 shares in 1997, 1998 and 1999, respectively. STOCK SPLIT--On July 21, 1997, the Company's Board of Directors declared a 3 for 2 stock split in the form of a stock dividend. The accompanying financial statements reflect the stock split as if it had occurred as of the earliest period being presented.2002. ACCOUNTING FOR STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION--TheCOMPENSATION - The Company has chosen to account for stock-based compensation to employees and non-employee members of the Board using the intrinsic value method prescribed by Accounting Principles Board Opinion ("APB") No. 25, "AccountingAccounting for Stock Issued to Employees," and related interpretations. As required by Statement of Financial Accounting StandardsSFAS No. 123, ("SFAS No. 123"), Accounting"Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation," the Company has presented certain pro forma and other disclosures related to stock-based compensation plans. RECLASSIFICATIONS--Certain amounts in the 1998 and 1997 financial statements have been reclassified to conform to the 1999 presentation. NEW ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS--In June 1997, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 130 ("SFAS No. 130"), REPORTING COMPREHENSIVE INCOME. SFAS No. 130 requires that all components of comprehensive income be reported on one of the following: (1) the statement of income; (2) the statement of changes in stockholders' equity, or (3) a separate statement of comprehensive income. Comprehensive income is comprised of net income and all changes to stockholders' equity, except those due to investments by stockholders (changes in paid-in capital) and distributions to stockholders (dividends). SFAS No. 130 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 1997.DERIVATIVE FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS - The Company adopted SFAS No. 130 F-7 SUPREME INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(CONTINUED) FOR EACH OF THE THREE YEARS IN THE PERIOD ENDED JANUARY 31, 1999 2. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES--(CONTINUED) for the fiscal year ended January 31, 1999. The components of comprehensive income which are excluded from net income are not significant, individually or in the aggregate, and therefore no separate statement of comprehensive income has been presented. In June 1997, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 131 ("SFAS No. 131"), DISCLOSURE ABOUT SEGMENTS OF AN ENTERPRISE AND RELATED INFORMATION. SFAS No. 131 changes the way public companies report information about segments of their business in their annualutilizes derivative financial statements and requires theminstruments to report selected segment information in their quarterly reports issued to shareholders. SFAS No. 131 also requires entity-wide disclosure about products and services an entity provides, the foreign countries in which it holds assets and reports revenues and its major customers. SFAS No. 131 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 1997. The Company adopted SFAS No. 131 for the fiscal year ended January 31, 1999 (see Note 15). In March 1998, the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants issued Statements of Position 98-1, ACCOUNTING FOR THE COSTS OF COMPUTER SOFTWARE DEVELOPED OR Obtained for Internal Use ("SOP 98-1"). SOP 98-1 provides guidance for capitalizing and expensing the costs of computer software developed or obtained for internal use. SOP 98-1 is effective for financial statements for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 1998. Management has not determined the effect, if any, of adopting SOP 98-1. In April 1998, the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants issued Statements of Position 98-5, REPORTING ON THE COSTS OF START-UP ACTIVITIES ("SOP 98-5"). SOP 98-5 establishes accounting standards for the reporting of certain costs associated with the start-up of operations, lines of business, etc. SOP 98-5 requires that costs of start-up activities, including organizational costs, be expenses as incurred and that in the year of adoption, start-up costs recorded should be expensed. SOP 98-5 is effective for fiscal years beginning subsequent to December 15, 1998. Management has not determined the effect, if any, of adopting SOP 98-5.reduce interest rate risk. In June 1998, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued StatementSFAS No. 133, "Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities," which was amended in June 2000 by SFAS No. 138. SFAS No. 133, as amended, establishes accounting and reporting standards for derivative instruments and hedging activities. They require that an entity recognize all derivatives as either assets or liabilities in the consolidated balance sheet and measure those instruments at fair value. Changes in the fair value of those instruments will be reported in earnings or other comprehensive income depending on the use of the derivative and whether it qualifies for hedge accounting. Derivative financial instruments that do not qualify for hedge accounting will be reported in earnings. RECLASSIFICATIONS - Certain amounts in the prior years' financial statements may have been reclassified to conform to the current year presentation. RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENT - In November, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") Emerging Issues Task Force ("EITF") reached a consensus on Issue No. 01-9, "Accounting for Consideration Given by a Vendor to a Customer (Including a Reseller of the Vendor's Product)." This issue addresses the recognition, measurement and income statement classification of consideration from a vendor to a customer in connection with the customer's purchase or promotion of the vendor's products. This consensus is expected to only impact revenue and expense classifications and not change reported income. In accordance with the consensus reached, the Company will adopt the required accounting beginning with the fiscal year beginning February 1, 2002. The Company's adoption of EITF No. 01-9 will result in reclassification of certain marketing expenses to reflect them as reduction of revenues. The reclassification will have no effect on net income. In June 1998, the FASB issued SFAS No. 133, ACCOUNTING FOR DERIVATIVE INSTRUMENTS AND HEDGING Activities ("SFAS No. 133")."Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities." Among other provisions, SFAS No. 133 establishes accounting and reporting standards for derivative instruments and for hedging activities. It also requires that an entity recognize all F-9 derivatives as either assets or liabilities in the statement of financial position and measure those instruments at fair value. SFAS No. 133, as amended by SFAS No. 138, is effective for financial statements for fiscal yearyears beginning after June 15, 1999. Management has not determined2000. The Company adopted the effect, if any,provisions of adopting SFAS No. 133. 3. ACQUISITIONS MUNSINGWEAR ACQUISITION--On September 6, 1996,133 effective February 1, 2001. On the Company acquired certain assetsdate of Munsingwear, Inc. ("Munsingwear"),adoption, SFAS No. 133 did not have a manufacturersignificant impact on the Company's financial statements. In July 2001, the FASB issued SFAS No. 141, "Business Combinations." SFAS No. 141 requires the use of men's casual apparel, for approximately $18,400,000. The assets acquired consisted of brand names including GRAND SLAM/registered trademark/, GRAND SLAM TOUR/registered trademark/, PENGUIN SPORT/registered trademark/, and other intangible assets. The purchase price amounted to approximately $19,800,000, which included $1,400,000 of transaction costs, and was primarily allocated to working capital and intangible assets as follows: inventories $300,000; accounts receivable $300,000; and brand F-8 SUPREME INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(CONTINUED) FOR EACH OF THE THREE YEARS IN THE PERIOD ENDED JANUARY 31, 1999 3. ACQUISITIONS--(CONTINUED) names $19,200,000. The acquisition was accounted for under the purchase method of accounting for all business combinations initiated after June 30, 2001 and was financedeliminates the pooling-of- interests method. SFAS No. 141 also addresses the recognition and measurement of goodwill and other intangibles assets acquired in a business combination. In July 2001, the FASB issued SFAS No. 142, "Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets," which changes the accounting treatment as it applies to goodwill and other identifiable intangible assets with borrowingsindefinite useful lives from an amortization method to an impairment-only approach. Under SFAS No. 142, proper accounting treatment requires annual assessment for any impairment of the carrying value of the assets based upon an estimation of the fair value of the identifiable intangible asset with an indefinite useful life, or in the case of goodwill of the reporting unit to which the goodwill pertains. Under SFAS No. 142, goodwill and identifiable intangible assets with an indefinite useful live are no longer subject to amortization. Impairment losses, if any, arising from the revolving credit agreement (see Note 10). JOLEM ACQUISITION--On May 6, 1996,initial application of SFAS No. 142 are to be reported as a cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle. The effective date of this statement is for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2001. The Company intends to adopt SFAS No. 142 for its fiscal year beginning February 1, 2002. In accordance with SFAS No. 142, the Company acquiredhas obtained a preliminary valuation and estimated useful life report of all its trademarks from a third- party independent valuation firm. Preliminary results of this analysis, which the Company is still evaluating, would indicate no significant impairment in the carrying value of its trademarks upon adoption of the standard and the trademarks have indefinite useful lives. Under the new pronouncement, amortization expense relating to identifiable intangible assets of Jolem Imports, Inc. ("Jolem"), a Miami based manufacturer of men's and boy's casual apparel. The purchase pricewith indefinite useful lives, which amounted to approximately $3,700,000$3,584,000, $3,955,000 and was primarily allocated$4,912,000 for fiscal January 31, 2000, 2001 and 2002, respectively, will not be required in future years. On October 3, 2001, the FASB issued SFAS No. 144. "Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets," which addresses financial accounting and reporting for the impairment or disposal of long-lived assets. While SFAS No. 144 supersedes SFAS No. 121 "Accounting for the Impairment of Long-Lived Assets and Long-Lived Assets to working capitalbe Disposed Of," it retains many of the fundamental provisions of SFAS No. 121. SFAS No. 144 also supersedes the accounting and intangible assets as follows: inventories $1,800,000; accounts receivable $1,500,000;reporting provisions of APB Opinion No. 30, "Reporting the Results of Operations---Reporting the Effects of Disposal of a Segment of a Business, and brand names $400,000.Extraordinary, Unusual and Infrequently Occurring Events and Transactions," for the disposal of a segment of a business. The acquisition was accountedeffective date of SFAS No.144 is for underfiscal years beginning after December 15, 2001. SFAS No. 144 is not expected to have a significant effect on the purchase methodfinancial position or the results of accounting.operation of the Company. 3. Shares Repurchase On July 11, 2000, the Board of Directors of the Company approved a share repurchase program in which up to 500,000 shares of common stock may be purchased from time to time during the following 12 months. On July 11, 2001, the Board of Directors extended the current share repurchase program for an additional year, and on September 25, 2001 increased the number of shares authorized for repurchase to 750,000 shares. The shares may be purchased in the open market or in privately negotiated transactions. For the fiscal year ended January 31, 2002, the Company had repurchased 295,300 additional shares at an average price of $7.37 per share. On March 2, 2001 and October 29, 2001, the Company retired 160,000 and 244,600 shares held in the treasury, respectively. F-10 4. ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLEAccounts Receivable Accounts receivable consistedconsist of the following as of January 31:
1998 1999 --------------- ---------------2001 2002 ------------ ----------- Trade accounts ................................................ $ 37,499,297 $ 43,219,125$51,848,737 $47,778,539 Royalties and other receivables ............................... 2,217,338 1,479,149 ------------ ------------7,400,850 4,506,696 ----------- ----------- Total ......................................................... 39,716,635 44,698,27459,249,587 52,285,235 Less: Allowance for doubtful accounts ......................... (609,874) (609,874) Allowance for sales returns and other chargebacks .......... (3,604,154) (5,118,555) ------------ ------------(427,965) (1,914,990) ----------- ----------- Total ......................................................... $ 35,502,607 $ 38,969,845 ============ ============$58,821,622 $50,370,245 =========== ===========
The activity for the allowance accounts arefor doubtful account is as follows:
1997 1998 1999 --------------- ---------------- ----------------2000 2001 2002 ------------ ---------- ---------- Allowance for doubtful accounts:accounts Beginning balance ............................ $ 242,792 $ 250,000 $ 609,874 $1,014,576 $ 427,965 Provision .................................... 135,854 799,129 167,659450,541 330,435 1,575,000 Write-offs, net of recoveries ................ (128,646) (439,255) (167,659) ------------ ------------- -------------(45,839) (917,046) (87,975) ----------- ---------- ---------- Ending balance ............................... $ 250,0001,014,576 $ 609,874 $ 609,874 ============ ============= ============= Allowance for sales returns and other chargebacks: Beginning balance ............................ $ 567,014 $ 1,670,565 $ 3,604,154 Provision .................................... 9,057,342 13,047,822 11,984,955 Actual returns and other chargebacks ......... (7,953,791) (11,114,233) (10,470,554) ------------ ------------- ------------- Ending balance ............................... $ 1,670,565 $ 3,604,154 $ 5,118,555 ============ ============= =============427,965 $1,914,990 =========== ========== ==========
The Company carries accounts receivable at the amount it deems to be collectible. Accordingly, the Company provides allowances for accounts receivable it deems to be uncollectible based on management's best estimates. Recoveries are recognized in the period they are received. The ultimate amount of accounts receivable that become uncollectible could differ from those estimated. F-9 SUPREME INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(CONTINUED) FOR EACH OF THE THREE YEARS IN THE PERIOD ENDED JANUARY 31, 1999estimates. 5. INVENTORIES Inventories consistedInventories consist of the following as of January 31: 1998 1999 --------------- -------------- Finished goods ........................ $ 31,972,723 $ 30,730,131 Raw
2001 2002 ----------- ----------- Finished goods $37,960,098 $40,467,911 Ras materials and in process 1,063,772 - Merchandise in transit 4,532,504 4,941,136 ----------- ----------- Total $43,556,374 $45,409,047 =========== ===========
6. Property and in process .......... 1,204,841 255,085 Merchandise in transit ................ 2,621,824 1,980,439 ------------ ------------ Total ................................. $ 35,799,388 $ 32,965,655 ============ ============ 6. PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENTEquipment Property and equipment consistedconsists of the following as of January 31: 1998 1999 --------------- --------------- Land .................................. $ -- $ 1,125,000 Furniture, fixture and equipment ...... 5,723,557 7,205,651 Vehicles .............................. 309,955 371,364 Leasehold improvements ................ 1,617,288 2,299,704 ------------ ------------ 7,650,800 11,001,719 Less: accumulated depreciation ........ (2,751,144) (3,150,127) ------------ ------------ Total ................................. $ 4,899,656 $ 7,851,592 ============ ============
2001 2002 ----------- ----------- Furniture, fixture and equipment $11,509,202 $11,615,513 Vehicles 188,906 167,940 Leasehold improvements 2,458,947 3,209,254 Land 1,581,702 1,581,702 ----------- ----------- Total 15,738,757 16,574,409 Less: accumulated depreciation and amortization (5,918,129) (5,677,075) ----------- ----------- Total $ 9,820,628 $10,897,334 =========== ===========
Depreciation expense relating to property and equipment amounted to approximately $800,000, $847,000,$1,241,000, $1,567,000 and $1,052,000$1,849,000 for the fiscal years ended January 31, 1997, 19982000, 2001 and 1999,2002, respectively. F-11 7. INTANGIBLE ASSETSIntangible Assets Intangible assets consisted of the following as of January 31: 1998 1999 -------------- --------------2001 2002 ------------ ------------ Trademarks & Licenses ............. $ 21,306,788 $ 21,544,562and licenses $132,216,093 $132,315,018 Goodwill .......................... 17,86416,165 16,165 ------------ ------------ 21,324,652 21,560,727Total 132,232,258 132,331,183 Less: Accumulated Amortization .......... (1,608,588) (2,717,930)amortization (10,215,577) (14,392,289) ------------ ------------ Balance, net ...................... $ 19,716,064 $ 18,842,797$122,016,681 $117,938,894 ============ ============ Amortization expense relating to the intangible assets amounted to approximately $347,000, $901,000$3,584,000, $3,955,000 and $1,109,000,$4,342,000 for the fiscal years ended January 31, 1997, 19982000, 2001 and 1999,2002, respectively. F-10 SUPREME INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(CONTINUED) FOR EACH OF THE THREE YEARS IN THE PERIOD ENDED JANUARY 31, 1999 8. ACCRUED EXPENSESAccrued Expenses Accrued expenses consistedconsists of the following as of January 31: 1998 1999 ------------- ------------- Income taxes ...................... $ 370,687 $2,107,4572001 2002 ---------- ---------- Salaries and commissions .......... 662,865 1,549,758$1,808,047 $1,735,024 Royalties 318,325 281,280 Buying commissions ................ 597,280 818,188401,787 287,944 Other ............................. 432,080 456,1221,132,205 955,354 ---------- ---------- Total ............................. $2,062,912 $4,931,525$3,660,364 $3,259,602 ========== ========== 9. BORROWINGS UNDER LETTER OF CREDIT FACILITIESOther Current Liabilities Other current liabilities consists of the following as of January 31: 2001 2002 ---------- ---------- Unearned advertising reimbursements $1,334,969 $2,059,667 Other 316,498 350,916 ---------- ---------- Total $1,651,467 $2,410,583 ========== ========== 10. Derivatives Financial Instruments The Company has an interest rate risk management policy with the objective of managing its interest costs. To meet this objective the Company employs hedging and derivatives strategies to limit the effects of changes in interest rates on its operating income and cash flows, and to lower its overall fixed rate interest cost on its senior subordinated notes. The Company believes its interest rate risk management policy is generally effective. Nonetheless, the Company's profitability may be adversely affected during particular periods as a $45result of changing interest rates. In addition, hedging transactions using derivative instruments involve risks such as counter- party credit risk and risks regarding the legal enforceability of hedging contracts. The counter-parties to the Company's arrangements are lenders of the hedged debt instruments or are major financial institutions. In August 2001, the Company entered into an interest rate swap, option and interest rate cap agreements (the "August Swap Agreement") for an aggregate notional amount of $40.0 million facilityin order to minimize its debt servicing costs associated with its $100.0 million of 12 1/4% senior subordinated notes due April 1, 2006. The August Swap Agreement was subsequently modified through a basis swap entered into in October 2001 (the "October Swap Agreement," and collectively with the August Swap Agreement, the "Swap Agreement"). The Swap Agreement is scheduled to terminate on April 1, 2006. Under the Swap Agreement, the Company is F-12 entitled to receive semi-annual interest payments on October 1, and April 1, at a fixed rate of 12 1/4% and is obligated to make semi-annual interest payments on October 1, and April 1, at a floating rate based on the 6-month LIBOR rate plus 715 basis points for the 18 months period October 1, 2001 through March 31, 2003 (per October Swap Agreement); and 3-month LIBOR rate plus 750 basis point for the period April 1, 2003 through April 1, 2006 (per the August Swap Agreement). The Swap Agreement has optional call provisions with trigger dates of April 1, 2003, April 1, 2004 and April 1, 2005, which provides upcontain certain premium requirements in the event the call is exercised. The fair value of the interest rate swap and option are recorded on the Company's Consolidated Balance Sheet was ($0.245) million as of January 31, 2002. The interest rate cap and basis swap did not qualify for hedge accounting treatment under the SFAS No. 133, resulting in $0.7 million reduction of recorded interest expense in results of operations for the fiscal year ended January 31, 2002. The Company does not currently have a significant exposure to $35 millionforeign exchange risk and accordingly, has not entered into any transactions to issue sight lettershedge against those risks. See summary of "Significant Accounting Policies" for policy description of foreign currency translation. 11. Borrowings under Letter of Credit Facilities The Company maintains two letter of credit including a sub-limit of $2 million to issue time lettersfacilities totaling $42.0 million. Each letter of credit up to 120 days. In addition, the facility has a $10 million sub-limit for refinancing of sight letters of credit for a period of up to 120 days. The facility is collateralizedsecured by the consignment of merchandise in transit under eachthat letter of credit. Indebtedness under this facility bears interest at variable rates substantially equal to the lenders' prime rate minus 1.0% per annum (6.75% asAs of January 31, 1999).2002, there was $31.0 million available under then existing letter of credit facilities. Amounts outstanding under the $10 million sub-limit are collateralized by a secondary interest in the Company's accounts receivable and inventories. The Company has two additional letters of credit facilities which provide for borrowings of up to $15 million to issue sight letters of credit. The facilities are collateralized by the consignment of the merchandise in transit under each letter of credit. Borrowings available under letter of credit facilities consistedconsist of the following as of January 31: 1998 1999 --------------- ---------------2001 2002 ------------ ------------ Total letter of credit facilities ...... $ 60,000,00052,000,000 $ 60,000,000 Borrowings ............................. (3,000,000) --42,000,000 Outstanding letters of credit .......... (26,673,016) (23,831,172) ------------- -------------(27,923,927) (11,035,880) ------------ ------------ Available .............................. $ 30,326,98424,076,073 $ 36,168,828 ============= ============= 10. LONG-TERM DEBT--SENIOR CREDIT FACILITY30,964,120 ============ ============ 12. Long Term Debt-Senior Credit Facility The Company amended its revolvingsenior credit facility (the "Senior Credit Facility") on August 1, 1998March 26, 1999 with a group of banks giving it the right to borrow $60 million or a portion thereof for its general corporate purposes. The Senior Credit Facility expires in April 2001 . Borrowings are limited under the termsconsisting of a borrowing base calculation which generally restricts the outstanding balancerevolving credit facility of up to 85%an aggregate amount of eligible receivables plus 50% of eligible inventories, as defined. Interest on borrowings is variable, based upon the Company's option of selecting a LIBOR plus 1.25% or the bank's prime rate.$75.0 million. The weighted average interest rate on the senior credit facility was 6.69% as of8.7% and 7.3% for the fiscal years ending January 31, 1999.2001 and 2002, respectively. The Senior Credit Facilityfacility contains certain covenants the most restrictive of which require the Company to maintain certain financial and net worth ratios. In addition, the Senior Credit Facilityratios and restricts the payment of dividends. As of January 31, 2002, the Company was not in compliance with a certain funded indebtedness to EBITDA financial covenant which noncompliance has been waived subsequent to January 31, 2002. The Senior Credit Facilitysenior credit facility is secured by the Company's assets.assets of the Company. The outstandingsenior credit facility expires on October 1, 2002 and as such the Company has classified its credit facility as current in the consolidated balance under the Senior Credit Facilitysheet as of January 31, 1998 and 1999 amounted to $36,658,174 and $33,511,157, respectively. F-11 SUPREME INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(CONTINUED) FOR EACH OF THE THREE YEARS IN THE PERIOD ENDED JANUARY 31, 1999 10. LONG-TERM DEBT--SENIOR CREDIT FACILITY--(CONTINUED)2002. The Company has receivedis currently in active discussions to renew or replace its existing senior credit facility. Management believes this discussion will be successfully completed prior to the October 1, 2002 expiration date. 13. Senior Subordinated Notes Payable The Company issued $100.0 million senior subordinated notes on April 6, 1999, the proceeds of which were used to acquire the Perry Ellis, John Henry and Manhattan brands and to pay down the F-13 outstanding balance of the senior credit facility. The notes mature on April 1, 2006, and bear interest at the rate of 12 1/4 % payable on April 1 and October 1 in each year. The proceeds to the Company were $98,852,000, yielding an effective interest rate of 12.39% after deduction of discounts. The notes are unsecured senior subordinated obligations and are subordinated to all of the Company's existing and future senior indebtedness. The notes rank equally with all of the Company's future senior subordinated indebtedness. The indenture agreement contains certain covenants which requires the Company to maintain certain financial ratios and restricts the payment of dividends. As of January 31, 2002, the Company was in compliance with its debt covenants of the senior subordinated notes. Optional Redemption. The notes are redeemable at the option of the Company, as a proposal letterwhole or in part from time to amendtime, at any time on or after April 1, 2003 at the Senior Credit Facility. As amended,redemption prices (expressed as percentages of principal amount) set forth below, together with accrued interest, if any, to the Senior Credit Facility will provide (a) a revolving credit facilitydate of redemption, if redeemed during the 12-month period beginning on April 1 of the years indicated below (subject to the right of holders of record on relevant record dates to receive interest due on an interest payment date): Year Redemption Price ---- ---------------- 2003.......................... 106.125% 2004.......................... 103.063% 2005 and thereafter........... 100.000% In addition, at any time or from time to time before April 1, 2002, the Company may redeem up to an35% of the aggregate principal amount of $80 million (the "Revolver") and (b)the notes within 60 days of one or more public equity offerings with the net proceeds of such offering at a term loan inredemption price equal to 112.25% of the principal amount thereof, together with accrued interest, if any, to the date of redemption (subject to the right of holders of record on relevant record dates to receive interest due on relevant interest payment dates); provided that, after giving effect to any such redemption, at least 65% of the aggregate principal amount of $20 million (the "Term Loan").the notes initially issued remains outstanding. The amended agreement will have a term of five years. 11. INCOME TAXESCompany did not exercise the redemption option before April 1, 2002. 14. Income Taxes The income tax provision consistedconsists of the following for each of the years ended January 31: 1997 1998 1999 ------------- ------------- -------------2000 2001 2002 ---------- ---------- ---------- Current income taxes: Federal ................... $2,910,509 $2,780,815 $3,057,838$4,677,353 $2,450,203 $2,115,199 State ..................... 526,754 307,371 1,002,692528,929 242,627 300,810 Foreign ................... -- -- 90,090(89,337) (128,460) 237,746 ---------- ---------- ---------- Total ...................... $3,437,263 $3,088,186 $4,150,6205,116,945 2,564,370 2,653,755 Deferred income taxes: Federal and state ......... 159,655 (203,342) 340,2461,412,735 2,098,295 1,386,240 ---------- ---------- ---------- Total ...................... $3,596,918 $2,884,844 $4,490,866$6,529,680 $4,662,665 $4,039,995 ========== ========== ========== The following table reconciles the statutory federal income tax rate to the Company's effective income tax rate for each of the years ended January 31: F-14
1997 1998 1999 ------------- ------------- -------------2000 2001 2002 ---------- ---------- ---------- Statutory federal income tax rate ............................... 35.0 % 35.0 % 35.0 %35.0% 35.0% 35.0% Increase (decrease) resulting from State income taxes, net of federal incomeIncome tax benefit .......... 3.9 2.1 2.9 2.5 2.7 Benefit of graduated rate ...................................... (1.0) (1.0) (1.0) Reversal of certain income tax reserves ........................ -- (5.0) --(0.6) (0.6) Other ........................................................... 0.2 (2.4) (2.5) ----- ----- -----0.6 0.8 ---------- ---------- ---------- Total ........................................................... 38.1 % 28.7 % 34.4 % ===== ===== =====34.4% 37.5% 37.9% ========== ========== ==========
F-12 SUPREME INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(CONTINUED) FOR EACH OF THE THREE YEARS IN THE PERIOD ENDED JANUARY 31, 1999 11. INCOME TAXES--(CONTINUED)Deferred income taxes are provided for the temporary differences between financial reporting basis and the tax basis of the Company's assets and liabilities under SFAS No. 109. The tax effects of temporary differences that give rise to deferred tax assets and liabilities are as follows as of January 31: 1998 1999 ------------ ------------31 are as follows: 2001 2002 ----------- ----------- Deferred income tax assets: Inventories .............................Tax Assets Inventory $ 642,944855,394 $ 795,442 Accounts receivable ..................... 227,468 220,165909,481 Allowance for doubtful accounts 155,168 698,971 Accrued expenses ........................ 183,750 --26,458 104,655 Unearned revenue 723,966 671,209 Other ................................... 100,743 75,875 --------- ---------190,567 - ----------- ----------- Subtotal 1,951,553 2,384,316 ----------- ----------- Deferred income tax assets .............. 1,154,905 1,091,482 --------- --------- Deferred income tax liabilities:Tax Liabilities Fixed assets ............................ (61,742) (318,580)(1,419,643) (1,635,853) Intangible .............................. (99,694) (241,148)assets (3,410,355) (4,889,857) Other ................................... (121,469) -- --------- --------- Deferred income tax liabilities ......... (282,905) (559,728) --------- ---------100,831 (224,122) ----------- ----------- Subtotal (4,930,829) (6,749,832) ----------- ----------- Net deferred income tax asset ........... $872,000 $531,754 ========= ========= A(liability) $(2,979,276) $(4,365,516) =========== =========== Management believes that a valuation allowance for deferred income tax assets is not deemed necessary as the assets are expected to be recovered. 12. RETIREMENT PLANDeferred taxes have not been recognized on unremitted earnings of the Company's foreign subsidiaries based on the "indefinite reversal" criteria of APB Opinion No. 23. 15. Retirement Plan The Company adoptedhas a 401(K)401(k) Profit Sharing Plan (the "Plan") in which eligible employees may participate. Employees are eligible to participate in the Plan upon the attainment of age 21, and completion of one year of service. Participants may elect to contribute up to 15% of their annual compensation, not to exceed amounts prescribed by statutory guidelines. The Company is required to contribute an amount equal to 50% of each participant's eligible contribution up to 4%6% of the participant's annual compensation. The Company may elect to contribute additional amounts at its discretion. The Company's contributions to the planPlan were approximately $34,000, $74,000,$128,000, $173,000 and $115,000$199,000 for the fiscal years ended January 31, 1997, 19982000, 2001 and 19992002, respectively. 13. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONSF-15 16. Related Party Transactions The Company leases certain office and warehouse space owned by the Company's Chairman of the Board of Directors and Chief Executive Officer under non-cancelable operatingcertain lease arrangements.arrangements, most of which are month-to-month. Rent expense, including taxes, for these leases amounted to approximately $600,000, $625,000$265,000, $316,000 and $546,000$537,000, for the fiscal years ended January 31, 1997, 19982000, 2001 and 1999,2002, respectively. The Company entered into a license agreementlicensing agreements (the "License Agreement"Agreements") with Isaco International, Inc. ("Isaco"), pursuant to which Isaco was granted anthe exclusive license to use the Natural IssuesIssue, Perry Ellis and Career Club brand namenames in the United States and Puerto Rico to market a line of men's underwear, hosiery and loungewear. The License Agreement provides for a guaranteed minimum royalty payment to the Company of $137,500 and expires on May 31, 1999. The principal shareholder of Isaco is the father-in-law of the Company's President and Chief Operating Officer. Royalty income earned from the License F-13 SUPREME INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(CONTINUED) FOR EACH OF THE THREE YEARS IN THE PERIOD ENDED JANUARY 31, 1999 13. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS--(CONTINUED) AgreementAgreements amounted to approximately $243,000, $296,000$438,000, $834,000 and $298,000$1,230,000 for the fiscal years ended January 31, 1997, 19982000, 2001 and 1999,2002, respectively. In January 1998, the Company entered into two additional three-year license agreements with Isaco for use of the Natural Issue brand in the United States17. Stock Options and its territories and possessions to market lines of hosiery and neckwear.Warrants Stock Options - The license agreement for neckwear provides for a guaranteed minimum annual royalty of $15,000 and the license agreement for hosiery provides for a guaranteed minimum annual royalty of $25,000 during the first year, increasing by $5,000 in each subsequent year. 14. STOCK OPTIONS AND WARRANTS STOCK OPTIONS--The Company adopted a 1993 Stock Option Plan (the "1993 Plan") and a Directors Stock Option Plan (the "Directors Plan") (collectively, the "Stock Option Plans"), under which shares of common stock are reserved for issuance upon the exercise of the options. The number of shares issuable under the Directors Plan is 150,000. The 1993 Plan was amended during fiscal 1999 to increase the number of shares issuable from 450,000 shares to 900,000 shares.under the 1993 plan is 1,500,000. The Stock Option Plans are designed to serve as an incentive for attracting and retaining qualified and competent employees, directors, consultants, and independent contractors of the Company. The 1993 Plan provides for the granting of both incentive stock options and nonstatutory stock options. Incentive stock options may only be granted to employees. Only non-employee directors are eligible to receive options under the Directors Plan. All matters relating to the Directors Plan are administered by a committee of the Board of Directors consisting of two or more employee directors, including selection of participants, allotment of shares, determination of price and other conditions of purchase, except that the per share exercise price of options granted under the Directors Plan may not be less than the fair market value of the common stock on the date of grant. Options can be granted under the 1993 Plan on such terms and at such prices as determined by the Board of Directors, or a committee thereof, except that the per share exercise price of incentive stock options granted under the 1993 Plan may not be less than the fair market value of the common stock on the date of grant, and in the case of an incentive stock option granted to a 10% shareholder, the per share exercise price will not be less than 110% of such fair market value. The aggregate fair market valueA summary of the shares covered by incentive stock option activity for options grantedissued under the 1993 Plan that become exercisable by a grantee in any calendar yearand the Directors Plan is subject to a $100,000 limit. On December 9, 1998, in order to provide an appropriate incentive to certain members of management whose stock option exercise prices were higher than the market price on that date, the Company allowed certain options to be repriced. This repricing was at the consent of the option holders, and all other terms of the options, including grant dates and exercise dates, remain intact and in accordance with the 1993 Plan. F-14 SUPREME INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(CONTINUED) FOR EACH OF THE THREE YEARS IN THE PERIOD ENDED JANUARY 31, 1999 14. STOCK OPTIONS AND WARRANTS--(CONTINUED) A summary of the status of the option plans as of andfollows for the changes during each of the three years in the period ended January 31, 1999 is presented below:31:
OPTION PRICE PER SHARE OPTIONS EXERCISABLE --------------------------------- ----------------------------- NUMBER NUMBER WEIGHTED AVERAGE OF SHARES LOW HIGH WEIGHTED OF SHARES EXERCISE PRICE ------------- ----------Option Price Per Share Options Exercisable -------------------------- --------------------------- Number Number Weighted Average of Shares Low High Weighted of Shares Exercise Price ----------- ---------- ----------- ----------------------- ------ -------- --------- ---------------- Outstanding January 31, 1996 218,2501999 566,000 $6.67 $15.75 $11.95 410,375 $12.66 Granted 2000 501,000 $8.81 $13.50 $ 6.339.26 Exercised 2000 (19,500) $6.67 $10.07 $ 10.758.39 Cancelled 2000 (15,000) $6.50 $15.25 $ 7.71 114,938 $ 8.06 Granted 1997 ................ 90,000 $ 6.67 $ 10.75 $ 8.87 Exercised 1997 .............. (7,500) $ 6.50 $ 6.50 $ 6.50 Cancelled 1997 .............. (7,500) $ 6.50 $ 6.50 $ 6.50 -------9.59 ----------- Outstanding January 31, 1997 293,2502000 1,032,000 $7.67 $15.75 $10.69 833,459 $10.73 Granted 2001 167,000 $5.13 $13.00 $ 6.338.41 Exercised 2001 (7,500) $7.67 $ 10.757.67 $ 8.01 192,938 $ 8.14 Granted 1998 ................ 24,000 $ 9.17 $ 10.17 $ 9.84 Exercised 1998 .............. (26,250) $ 6.67 $ 10.75 $ 7.737.67 Cancelled 1998 .............. -- -------2001 (78,500) $9.63 $14.25 $10.13 ----------- Outstanding January 31, 1998 291,0002001 1,113,550 $5.13 $15.75 $10.44 940,616 $10.41 Granted 2002 71,667 $5.13 $ 6.338.85 $ 10.757.37 Exercised 2002 (2,666) $5.13 $ 7.92 221,7506.88 $ 7.90 Granted 1999 ................ 387,000 $ 9.75 $ 15.75 $ 13.18 Exercised 1999 .............. (103,125) $ 6.33 $ 10.67 $ 7.36 Cancelled 1999 .............. (8,875) $ 10.67 $ 15.25 $ 10.96 -------- Outstanding January 31, 1999 566,000 $ 6.67 $ 15.75 $ 11.95 410,375 $ 12.66 ========5.79
The following table summarizes the information about options outstanding at January 31, 1999:F-16
OPTIONS OUTSTANDING OPTIONS EXERCISABLE - ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------- WEIGHTED AVERAGE REMAINING WEIGHTED WEIGHTED RANGE OF NUMBER CONTRACTUAL LIFE AVERAGE NUMBER AVERAGE EXERCISE PRICES OUTSTANDING (IN YEARS) EXERCISE PRICE EXERCISABLE EXERCISE PRICE - ----------------------- ------------- ------------------ ---------------- ------------- --------------- Cancelled 2002 (88,750) $5.13 $13.44 $10.40 ---------- Outstanding January 31, 2002 1,093,801 $5.13 $15.75 $10.27 980,774 $10.40 ==========
The following table summarizes information about options outstanding as of January 31, 2002:
Options Outstanding Options Exercisable - ---------------------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------- Weighted Average Remaining Weighted Weighted Range of Number Contractual Life Average Number Average Exercise Prices Outstanding (in years) Exercise Price Exercisable Exercise Price - ------------------- ------------- ---------------- ---------------- ----------- -------------- $ 6.50 -5.13 $ 9.75 152,750 3.07.50 88,501 6.4 $ 8.20 135,6255.57 62,666 $ 8.195.21 $ 7.51 $ 10.00 - $15.00 172,250 4.7663,750 4.3 $ 10.69 42,7508.80 621,292 $ 10.128.80 $ 15.25 - $15.75 241,000 9.110.01 $ 15.73 232,00012.00 78,550 1.0 $ 10.56 42,149 $ 10.56 $ 12.01 $ 15.75 263,000 6.7 $ 15.49 254,667 $ 15.56
F-15 SUPREME INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(CONTINUED) FOR EACH OF THE THREE YEARS IN THE PERIOD ENDED JANUARY 31, 1999 14. STOCK OPTIONS AND WARRANTS--(CONTINUED) As described in Note 2, the Company accountswe account for stock-based compensation using the provisions of APB No. 25 and related interpretations. No compensation expense has been recognized in the years ended January 31, 1997, 19982000, 2001 and 19992002 as the exercise prices for the stock options granted arewere equal to their fair market value at the time of grant. Had compensation cost for options granted been determined in accordance with the fair value provisions of SFAS No. 123, the Company'sour net income and net income per share would have been as followsreduced to the pro forma amounts presented below for the years ended January 31: 1997 1998 1999 --------------- ---------------- --------------- Net income: As reported ......... $ 5,844,019 $ 7,178,162 $ 8,581,679 =========== ============ ============2000 2001 2002 ----------- ---------- ---------- Pro forma ........... $ 5,710,383 $ 7,026,242 $ 8,145,789net income $10,150,643 $7,078,649 $6,185,478 =========== ============ ============ Net========== ========== Pro forma net income per share: As reported Basic .............. $ 0.89 $ 1.10 $ 1.29 =========== ============ ============ Diluted ............ $ 0.891.51 $ 1.08 $ 1.270.95 =========== ============ ============ Pro forma: Basic ...............========== ========== Diluted $ 0.87 $ 1.07 $ 1.22 =========== ============ ============ Diluted ............. $ 0.871.48 $ 1.05 $ 1.200.95 =========== ============ ====================== ========== The fair value forof these options was estimated at the date of grant date using the Black-Scholes Option Pricing Model with the following weighted-average assumptions for 1997, 19982000, 2001 and 1999: 1997 1998 1999 --------- --------- ---------2002: 2000 2001 2002 ---------------------------- Risk free interest rate ................ 6.5% 6.5% 6.5%3.3% Dividend yield ......................... 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Volatility factors ..................... 58.0% 45.9%64.0% 67.9% 67.3% Weighted average life (years) .......... 5.0 5.0 5.09.0 4.5 1.9 Using the Black-Scholes Option Pricing Model, the estimated weighted-averageweighted- average fair value per option granted in 1997, 19981999, 2000 and 1999 were $4.97, $5.992001 was $6.99, $4.43 and $9.22,$2.75, respectively. The Black-Scholes option valuation model was developed for use in estimating the fair value of traded options whichthat have no vesting restrictions and are fully transferable. In addition, option valuation models require the input of highly subjective assumptions including the expected stock price volatility. F-17 Because the Company'sour stock options have characteristics significantly different from those of traded options, and because changes in the subjective input assumptions can materially affect the fair value estimate, in management's opinion, the existing models do not necessarily provide a reliable single measure of the fair value of itsour stock options. The pro forma amounts may not be representative of the future effects on reported net income and net income per share that will result from the future granting of stock options, since the pro forma compensation expense is allocated over the periods in which options become exercisable and new option awards are granted each year. F-16 SUPREME INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(CONTINUED) FOR EACH OF THE THREE YEARS IN THE PERIOD ENDED JANUARY 31, 1999 14. STOCK OPTIONS AND WARRANTS--(CONTINUED) WARRANTS--In conjunction18. Segment Information In accordance with SFAS No. 131, "Disclosure About Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information," the Company's initial public offering in May 1993,principal segments are grouped between the Company granted 180,000 warrants entitlinggeneration of revenues from products and royalties. The Licensing segment derives its revenues from royalties associated from the holdersuse of each warrantits brand names, principally Perry Ellis, John Henry, Manhattan and Munsingwear. The Product segment derives its revenues from the design, import and distribution of apparel to purchase one share of common stock at an exercise price of $9.35 per share. The warrants became exercisable on May 21, 1995. All warrants were exercised during fiscal 1999. 15. SEGMENT INFORMATION The Company is engageddepartment stores and other retail outlets, principally in one line of business, that being a leading designerthroughout the United States. Trademark assets and marketer of a broad line of high quality men's sportswear, including sport and dress shirts, golf sportswear, sweaters, urban wear, casual and dress pants and shorts to all levels of retail distribution. We own or licensecosts have been allocated among the divisions where the brands under which most of our products are sold. The percentage of our revenues from branded products amounted to 75% in fiscal 1998shared. 2000 2001 2002 ------------- ------------- ------------- Revenues Product $ 229,549,158 $ 261,626,463 $ 253,033,752 Licensing 22,839,698 25,789,975 26,680,987 ------------- ------------- ------------- Total Revenues $ 252,388,856 $ 287,416,438 $ 279,714,739 ============= ============= ============= Operating Income Product $ 15,065,942 $ 10,772,903 $ 7,882,648 Licensing 16,249,185 17,482,217 16,398,275 ------------- ------------- ------------- Total Operating Income $ 31,315,127 $ 28,255,120 $ 24,280,923 ============= ============= ============= Interest Expense Product $ 3,417,678 $ 3,353,726 $ 1,630,120 Licensing 10,487,820 12,412,735 11,919,626 ------------- ------------- ------------- Total Interest Expense $ 13,905,498 $ 15,766,461 $ 13,549,746 ============= ============= ============= Income Tax Provision Product $ 4,368,823 $ 2,721,285 $ 2,637,938 Licensing 2,160,858 1,941,370 1,402,057 ------------- ------------- ------------- Total Income Tax Provision $ 6,529,681 $ 4,662,655 $ 4,039,995 ============= ============= ============= Depreciation and Amortization Product $ 1,493,055 $ 1,824,137 $ 2,181,229 Licensing 3,688,231 4,306,571 4,480,929 ------------- ------------- ------------- Total Depreciation and Amortization $ 5,181,286 $ 6,130,708 $ 6,662,158 ============= ============= ============= Identifiable Assets Product $ 113,454,814 $ 120,506,469 Licensing 127,685,408 111,057,137
F-18 Corporate 1,972,860 2,497,074 ------------- ------------- Total Identifiable Assets $ 243,113,082 $ 234,060,680 ============= =============
F-19 19. Commitments and 81% in fiscal 1999. Sales to any one customer exceeding ten percent amounted to 15%, 12% and 12% for the year ended January 31, 1997; 12% and 13% for the year ended January 31, 1998; and 15%, 10% and 10% for the year ended January 31, 1999. The Company does not believe that these concentrations of sales and credit risk represent a material risk of loss with respect to its financial position as of January 31, 1999. 16. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIESContingencies The Company has licensing agreements, as licensee, for the use of certain branded and designer labels. The license agreements expire on varying dates through December 31, 2000.2003. Total royalty payments under these license agreements amounted to approximately $405,000, $330,000$1,105,716, $1,198,106 and $573,000$1,635,239 for the years ended January 31, 1997, 19982000, 2001 and 1999,2002, respectively, and were classified as selling, generalcost of sales. The Company's administrative offices, warehouse and administrative expenses.distribution facility are located in a 240,000 square foot leased facility in Miami, which was built to our specifications and completed in 1997. The Companyfacility is party to an employment agreement with Oscar Feldenkreis, the Company's President and Chief Operating Officer, which expires in May 2000, and is subject to annual renewal. The employment agreement currently provides for an annual salary of $350,000, subject to annual cost-of-living increases, and an annual bonus as may be determined by the Compensation Committee in its discretion, upoccupied pursuant to a maximum of $500,000. The employment agreement requires Mr. Feldenkreis to devote his full-time to the affairs of the Company. Upon termination of the employment agreement by reason of the employee's death or disability, Mr. Feldenkreis or his estate will receive a lump sum payment equal to one year's salary plus a bonus as may be determined by the Compensation Committee in its discretion. The employment agreement also prohibits Mr. Feldenkreis from directly or indirectly competing with the Company for one year after termination of his employment for any reason except the Company's termination of Mr. Feldenkreis without cause. The Company is also party tosynthetic lease, which has an employment agreement with George Feldenkreis, the Company's Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer,initial term expiring in May 2000, and is subject to annual renewal. The employment agreement currently provides for an annual salary of $375,000, subject to annual cost-of-living increases, and an annual bonus as may be determined by the Compensation Committee in its discretion, up to a maximum of $250,000. Pursuant to his employment agreement, Mr. Feldenkreis devotes a majority of his working time to the affairs of the Company. George Feldenkreis' employment agreement contains termination and non-competition provisions similar to those set forth in Oscar Feldenkreis' agreement. F-17 SUPREME INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(CONTINUED) FOR EACH OF THE THREE YEARS IN THE PERIOD ENDED JANUARY 31, 1999 16. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES--(CONTINUED) The Company consolidated its administrative offices and warehouses and distribution facilities into a 238,000 square foot facility in Miami. The lease has a term of five years, minimumAugust 2002, annual rental payment of approximately $1,000,000$900,000 and requires a minimum contingent rental payment of $14.5 million at the terminationend of the 5-year term. The synthetic lease will not be renewed and the Company is in the process of $12,325,000.arranging new financing for its facilities through a mortgage lender. The minimum contingent rental payment is not required if, atsynthetic lease was entered into with a group of financial institutions to finance the acquisition and construction of the Company's option,corporate headquarters. The financial institutions assumed the Company's obligation to purchase the facility and, in turn, leased the facility to us. The obligations under the synthetic lease is renewed afterare secured by a security interest in substantially all the five year term.Company's existing and future assets, whether tangible or intangible, including, without limitation, accounts receivable, inventory deposit accounts, general intangibles, intellectual property and equipment. In addition to customary covenants found in secured lending agreements, the synthetic lease also contains various restrictive financial and other covenants including, without limitation, (a) prohibitions on the incurrence of additional indebtedness or guarantees, (b) restrictions on the creation of additional liens, (c) certain limitations on dividends and distributions or capital expenditures by the Company, (d) restrictions on mergers or consolidations, sales of assets, investments and transactions with affiliates and (e) certain financial maintenance tests. Such financial maintenance tests, include, among others, (i) a maximum funded indebtedness to EBITDA ratio, (ii) a minimum current ratio, (iii) a minimum net worth and (iv) a minimum fixed charge coverage ratio. As of January 31, 2002, the Company was not in compliance with the funded indebtedness to EBITDA financial covenant. The lessor under, and the financial institutions which financed, the synthetic lease have waived the noncompliance with this financial covenant. The Company leases three warehouse facilities in Miami totaling approximately 103,000 square feet from our Chairman and CEO and partnerships controlled by him, to handle the overflow of bulk shipments and the specialty division and PING operations. All leases are on a month-to-month basis at market prices. The Company leases two locations in New York City totaling approximately 8,500 square feet each, these leases expire in December 2007 and 2012. These locations are used for offices and showrooms. The Company leases a retail store in the Sawgrass Mills outlet mall in Sunrise, Florida with 11,240 square feet. This lease expires in September 2005. Since the Company began leasing this facility in May 2001, the location have been used as a test retail outlet store to sell our brands, principally Perry Ellis America. In order to monitor production of the Company's products in the Far East, we maintain offices in South Korea, and China, and also lease offices jointly with SPX Corporation, a publicly held company, in Beijing, China and Taipei, Taiwan. F-20 Minimum aggregate annual commitments for all of the Company's noncancelablenon- cancelable operating lease commitments, including the related party leases described in Note 13 and the minimum contingent rental payment described above, are as follows. YEAR ENDING JANUARY 31, - ------------------------- 2000 ................. $ 1,461,800 2001 ................. 1,335,600 2002 ................. 1,206,200 2003 ................. 13,154,500 2004 ................. 372,100 ------------ Total ............... $ 17,530,200 ============
Year Ending January 31, - ----------------------- 2003 $15,951,620 (A) 2004 465,650 2005 461,725 2006 461,725 2006 453,142 Future 1,017,125 ------------- Total $18,810,987 =============
(A) Includes synthetic lease payments of $15.4 million Rent expense for these operating leases, including the related party rent payments discussed in Note 13,16 amounted to $1,078,000, $1,460,000,$1,946,000, $1,660,632 and $1,946,000$2,526,293 for the fiscal years endedending January 31, 1997, 19982000, 2001 and 1999,2002, respectively. The Company guarantees up to $600,000 of letters of credit of an unaffiliated entity. Upon consummation of the John Henry/Manhattan acquisition described in Note 17, the Company will be required to pay Icahn Associates Corp. or its affiliates ("IAC") a financial advisory fee of $1.0 million. In addition, IAC has the right to acquire 1,320,000 shares of the Company's common stock at $12 per share. Simultaneously with the exercise of the right, IAC will be required to enter into a two-year standstill agreement and will receive certain registration rights with respect to the shares. The Company is subject to claims and suits, against it, as well asand is the initiator of claims and suits against others, in the ordinary course of its business, including claims arising from the use of its trademarks.business. The Company does not believe that the resolution of any pending claims will have a material adverse affecteffect on its financial position, results of operations or cash flows. F-18 SUPREME INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(CONTINUED) FOR EACH OF THE THREE YEARS IN THE PERIOD ENDED JANUARY 31, 1999 17. SUBSEQUENT EVENTS PERRY ELLIS INTERNATIONAL, INC. In January 1999,20. Subsequent Events Senior Secured Notes On March 22, 2002, the Company agreedcompleted a private offering of $57.0 million 9 1/2% senior secured notes due March 15, 2009. The proceeds of the private offering were used to buy Perry Ellis International, Inc. for approximately $75.0 millionfund the Jantzen acquisition, to reduce the amount of outstanding debt under the Company's senior credit facility and as additional working capital. The senior secured notes are secured by a security interest granted in cash. Perry Ellis International, Inc. is a privately-held company, which ownsthe Company's existing portfolio of trademarks and licenses, and the Perry Ellis brand, currently onetrademarks and licenses acquired in connection with the Jantzen acquisition (see below); all license agreements with respect to these trademarks; and all income, royalties and other payments with respect to such licenses. The senior secured notes are senior secured obligations of the top selling brandsCompany and will rank pari passu in specialty chains and department stores in the United States. Perry Ellis International, Inc. is currently the licensor under approximately 34 license agreements, primarily for various categoriesright of men's wear, boys' wear and fragrances. During the year ended December 31, 1998, Perry Ellis International, Inc. had revenuespayment with all of $16.2 million. The Company anticipates completing the Perry Ellis International acquisition in early April, 1999. SENIOR SUBORDINATED NOTES. Concurrently with the Company's acquisitionexisting and future senior indebtedness. The senior secured notes are effectively senior to all unsecured indebtedness of Perry Ellis International, Inc., the Company intends to issue $100,000,000 in senior subordinated notes due 2009. JOHN HENRY/MANHATTAN. In December 1998,the extent of the value of the assets securing the notes. Jantzen Acquisition On March 22, 2002, the Company entered into an agreement to buycompleted the acquisition from subsidiaries of VF Corporation of certain assets of the John Henry and Manhattan dress shirtJantzen swimwear business from Salant Corporation, which is currently in a Chapter 11 bankruptcy proceeding. On February 24, 1999, the bankruptcy court approved the purchase for approximately $44.2$24.0 million, excluding fees related to the transaction. The Jantzen brand has a history of over 90 years and its products are sold in cash.upscale department stores, mid-tier department stores, chain stores, mass merchants and specialty shops. The assets consistacquisition was financed with a portion of the John Henry, Manhattan and Lady Manhattan trademarks and trade names, license agreements,proceeds from a $57.0 million private offering of 9 1/2% senior secured notes due March 15, 2009, which we closed simultaneously with the existing dress shirt inventory with a value of approximately $17.2 million and certain manufacturing equipment.acquisition. The Company will also assumehas, through the acquisition of Jantzen, a lease agreement for the Mexican dress shirt manufacturingJantzen's Portland, Oregon office space for an initial six-month period. This facility and other ordinary course of business liabilities. This acquisition is expected to close on or about March 22, 1999.totals approximately 83,900 square feet. The Company has entered into a lease for a portion of Jantzen's Seneca, South Carolina distribution center facility for a one-year period, commencing March 22, 2002. This facility totals approximately 279,000 square feet. The Seneca, South Carolina facility carries an option to acquire the facility, which the Company can exercise within 60 days of the March 22, 2002 commencement date. The Company has been assigned a lease agreement for office and showroom space in New York City totaling 8,200 square feet through August 2006, which contains certain renewal provisions. In addition, the Company has entered into a lease agreement with Phillips-Van Heusen CorporationTommy Hilfiger F-21 to licenseoccupy approximately 200 square feet of space in Tommy Hilfiger's facility located in New York City through 2005. Interest Rate Swap and Option Agreement On March 15, 2002, the John HenryCompany entered into interest rate swap and Manhattan brands.option agreements for an aggregate notional amount of $57.0 million in order to minimize the debt servicing costs associated with the senior secured notes. The swap agreement alsois scheduled to terminate on March 15, 2009. Under the swap agreement, the Company is entitled to receive semi-annual interest payments on September 15 and March 15 at a fixed rate of 9 1/2% and are obligated to make semi-annual interest payments on September 15 and March 15 at a floating rate based on the three-month LIBOR rate plus 369 basis points for the period from March 22, 2002 through March 15, 2009. The swap agreement has optional call provisions with trigger dates of March 15, 2005, March 15, 2006 and March 15, 2007, which contain premium requirements in the event the call is exercised. Senior Credit Facility In March 2002, the Company amended its existing senior credit facility with the Company's group of banks, which as amended, provides the Company with a revolving credit facility of up to an aggregate amount of $60.0 million. This amendment was done concurrently with the $57.0 million senior subordinated notes offering discussed above. Borrowings are limited under the terms of a borrowing base calculation, which generally restricts the outstanding balance to the sum of (a) 80% of eligible receivables plus, (b) 90% of eligible factored accounts receivable plus 60% of eligible inventories, as defined. Interest on borrowings is variable, based upon the Company's option of selecting the bank's prime rate, or a short term LIBOR rate plus an additional amount based on the Company's debt coverage and other financial ratios. Letters of Credit Subsequent to January 31, 2002, the Company added two additional letter of credit facilities for an aggregate amount of $25.0 million. Concurrently with adding the additional facilities, the Company lowered one of its two existing facilities by the amount of $5.0 million. The Company now has four facilities totaling $62.0 million. Synthetic Lease In March 2002, the Company amended its synthetic lease with the lessor and the financial institution that financed the synthetic lease, which as amended provides that Phillips-Van Heusen will buy the existing dress shirt inventory from the Company atshall exercise the purchase option of the lease on or prior to June 30, 2002, increased the amount of stand-by letter of credit to $5.5 million and waived the noncompliance of a certain financial covenant the Company was not in compliance as of January 31, 2002. The Company is in the process of arranging new financing to replace the synthetic lease through a mortgage lender and the Company received a satisfactory financing offer from such lender, subject to additional due diligence. The transaction will result in the recognition of both an asset and a related liability on the Company's cost concurrent with the closing of the John Henry/Manhattan acquisition. F-19balance sheet. F-22 SUPREME INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(CONTINUED) FOR EACH OF THE THREE YEARS IN THE PERIOD ENDED JANUARY 31, 1999 18. SUMMARIZED QUARTERLY FINANCIAL DATA (UNAUDITED)21. Summarized Quarterly Financial Data (Unaudited)
1Q 2Q 3Q 4Q TOTAL ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------- (DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)First Second Third Fourth Total Quarter Quarter Quarter Quarter Year ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- (Dollars in thousands) FISCAL YEAR ENDED JANUARY 31, 19992002 Net Sales ........................$80,866 $58,926 $60,511 $52,731 $253,034 Royalty Income 6,065 6,858 6,403 7,355 26,681 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Total Revenues 86,931 65,784 66,914 60,086 279,715 Gross Profit 26,150 20,673 19,542 21,749 88,114 Net Income $ 60,0853,198 $ 49,7091,487 $ 65,012970 $ 46,541952 $ 221,3476,608 Income per share: Basic $ 0.49 $ 0.23 $ 0.15 $ 0.15 $ 1.01 Diluted $ 0.49 $ 0.23 $ 0.15 $ 0.15 $ 1.01 FISCAL YEAR ENDED JANUARY 31, 2001 Net Sales $78,232 $58,941 $64,356 $60,097 $261,626 Royalty Income 6,093 6,747 6,275 6,675 25,790 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Total Revenues 84,325 65,688 70,631 66,772 287,416 Gross Profit 25,453 20,923 19,121 21,036 86,533 Net Income $ 3,590 $ 1,818 $ 351 $ 2,067 $ 7,826 Income per share: Basic $ 0.53 $ 0.27 $ 0.05 $ 0.31 $ 1.17 Diluted $ 0.53 $ 0.27 $ 0.05 $ 0.31 $ 1.16 FISCAL YEAR ENDED JANUARY 31, 2000 Net Sales $59,479 $45,273 $66,618 $58,179 $229,549 Royalty income ................... 1,022 981 492 562 3,057 -------- -------- -------- -------- ---------2,316 6,744 6,454 7,326 22,840 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Total revenues ................... 61,107 50,690 65,504 47,103 224,40461,795 52,017 73,072 65,505 252,389 Gross Profit ..................... 15,648 13,166 16,085 13,307 58,20617,623 18,707 23,210 21,435 80,975 Net Income ....................... 2,637 1,053 2,812 2,080 8,582$ 2,892 $ 1,607 $ 3,964 $ 2,417 $ 10,880 Net income per share: Basic ........................... $ 0.400.43 $ 0.160.24 $ 0.42 $ 0.31 $ 1.29 Diluted ......................... $ 0.39 $ 0.15 $ 0.42 $ 0.31 $ 1.27 FISCAL YEAR ENDED JANUARY 31, 1998 Net Sales ........................ $ 48,841 $ 42,037 $ 54,550 $ 45,261 $ 190,689 Royalty income ................... 1,123 1,051 887 971 4,032 -------- -------- -------- -------- --------- Total revenues ................... 49,964 43,088 55,437 46,232 194,721 Gross Profit ..................... 12,963 10,538 12,477 12,752 48,730 Net Income ....................... 2,149 826 2,411 1,792 7,178 Net income per share: Basic ........................... $ 0.33 $ 0.13 $ 0.37 $ 0.27 $ 1.10 Diluted ......................... $ 0.33 $ 0.120.59 $ 0.36 $ 0.271.62 Diluted $ 1.08 FISCAL YEAR ENDED JANUARY 31, 1997 Net Sales ........................0.43 $ 37,8070.23 $ 31,1590.58 $ 46,7460.35 $ 41,661 $ 157,373 Royalty income ................... 28 70 405 1,151 1,654 -------- -------- -------- -------- --------- Total revenues ................... 37,835 31,229 47,151 42,812 159,027 Gross Profit ..................... 8,672 6,824 11,116 10,369 36,981 Net Income ....................... 1,615 689 1,974 1,566 5,844 Net income per share: Basic (1) ....................... $ 0.25 $ 0.11 $ 0.30 $ 0.24 $ 0.89 Diluted ......................... $ 0.25 $ 0.10 $ 0.30 $ 0.24 $ 0.891.59
- ---------------- (1) Total does not equal sum of quarters due to effect of the weighted averaging of shares outstanding. F-20 INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT Perry Ellis International, Inc.: We have audited the accompanying balance sheet of Perry Ellis International, Inc. as of December 31, 1997 and December 31, 1998, and the related statement of operations, undistributed income and cash flows for the three years ended December 31, 1996, December 31, 1997 and December 31, 1998. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the financial statements based upon our audit. We conducted our audit in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards. These standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining on a test basis evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by Management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion. In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Perry Ellis International, Inc. as of December 31, 1997 and December 31, 1998, and the results of its operations and cash flows for the three years ended December 31, 1996, December 31, 1997, and December 31, 1998, in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles. /s/ Saul L. Klaw & Co., P.C. Certified Public Accountants Dated: March 12, 1999 F-21 PERRY ELLIS INTERNATIONAL, INC. BALANCE SHEET
DECEMBER 31, ----------------------------- 1997 1998 ------------- ------------- ASSETS Current Assets Cash Balances ..................................................... $ 527,161 $1,776,722 Due from Licensees ................................................ 389,281 944,885 Prepaid Expenses .................................................. 758,171 543,383 Prepaid Franchise Taxes ........................................... -0- 75,232 Unexpired Insurance ............................................... 41,317 43,200 Employee Loan Receivable .......................................... -0- 6,183 ---------- ---------- Total Current Assets ............................................... 1,715,930 3,389,605 Fixed Assets ....................................................... 1,995,817 2,016,958 Less: Accumulated Depreciation ..................................... (647,380) (875,444) Security Deposits .................................................. 47,688 32,334 ---------- ---------- Total Assets ....................................................... $3,112,055 $4,563,453 ========== ========== LIABILITIES Current Liabilities Accounts Payable, Expenses ........................................ $ 542,170 $ 163,443 Accrued Payroll ................................................... 500,425 452,884 Employment Termination Payable, Current ........................... 90,000 108,296 Franchise Taxes Payable ........................................... 610,058 -0- ---------- ---------- Total Current Liabilities .......................................... 1,742,653 724,623 ---------- ---------- CAPITAL Capital Stock--no par value; 200 shares authorized; 50 shares issued and outstanding .................................................. 1,000 1,000 Undistributed Income ............................................... 1,368,402 3,837,830 ---------- ---------- Total Capital ...................................................... 1,369,402 3,838,830 ---------- ---------- Total Liabilities and Capital ...................................... $3,112,055 $4,563,453 ========== ==========
(See Notes to Financial Statements) F-22 PERRY ELLIS INTERNATIONAL, INC. STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, ------------------------------------------------ 1996 1997 1998 -------------- -------------- -------------- Royalty Revenues ................ $12,191,490 $15,739,291 $16,210,696 Less Agent's Commission ......... 1,273,879 78,750 33,750 ----------- ----------- ----------- Net Royalty Revenues ............ 10,917,611 15,660,541 16,176,946 Operating Expenses .............. 5,544,425 7,334,551 8,625,713 Non-recurring Items ............. 3,273,529 -0- -0- ----------- ----------- ----------- Operating Income ................ 2,099,657 8,325,990 7,551,233 Interest Income ................. 143,765 135,537 32,061 ----------- ----------- ----------- Income Before Taxes ............. 2,243,422 8,461,527 7,583,294 State and Local Taxes ........... 218,631 852,072 760,346 ----------- ----------- ----------- Net Income for the Year ......... $ 2,024,791 $ 7,609,455 $ 6,822,948 =========== =========== ===========
(See Notes to Financial Statements) F-23 PERRY ELLIS INTERNATIONAL, INC. UNDISTRIBUTED INCOME
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, --------------------------------------------- 1996 1997 1998 ------------- ------------- ------------- Balance at Beginning ......................... $2,826,046 $3,437,637 $1,368,402 Net Income for the Year ...................... 2,024,791 7,609,455 6,822,948 ---------- ---------- ---------- Total ........................................ 4,850,837 11,047,092 8,191,350 ---------- ---------- ---------- Less Distributions to Stockholder during year: Dividend Paid ........................... 1,390,000 9,625,000 4,325,000 Foreign Tax Credits ..................... 23,200 53,690 28,520 ---------- ---------- ---------- Total ........................................ 1,413,200 9,678,690 4,353,520 ---------- ---------- ---------- Balance at End ............................... $3,437,637 $1,368,402 $3,837,830 ========== ========== ==========
(See Notes to Financial Statements) F-24 PERRY ELLIS INTERNATIONAL, INC. STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, --------------------------------------------------- 1996 1997 1998 --------------- --------------- --------------- Cash Flow from Operating Activities: Net Income .............................................. $ 2,024,791 $ 7,609,455 $ 6,822,948 Depreciation ............................................ 212,000 225,783 228,064 Loss on Investment in Limited Partnership ............... 154,187 -0- -0- Changes in Operating Assets and Liabilities: Due from Licensees ..................................... 167,120 (362,559) (555,604) Prepaid Expenses ....................................... (265,840) (396,439) 212,905 Other Current Assets ................................... -0- -0- (6,183) Accounts Payable ....................................... 486,503 (140,906) (378,727) Accrued Payroll ........................................ (24,814) 325,192 (47,541) Corporate Taxes Payable ................................ (350,947) 610,058 (685,290) Employment Termination ................................. (75,000) (126,000) 18,296 Commissions Payable .................................... 200,000 (200,000) -0- Non-Current Assets ..................................... (851) (846) 15,354 Non-Current Liabilities ................................ (216,000) (90,000) -0- ------------ ------------ ------------ Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities ................ 2,311,149 7,453,738 5,624,222 ------------ ------------ ------------ Cash Flow from Investing Activities: (Credit) for Disposal of Service Agreement .............. (1,000,001) 1,000,001 -0- (Additions) to Fixed Assets ............................. (47,461) (87,160) (21,141) ------------ ------------ ------------ Net Cash (Used) Provided by Investing Activities ......... (1,047,462) 912,841 (21,141) ------------ ------------ ------------ Cash Flow from Financing Activities: Distribution to Stockholders ............................ (1,413,200) (9,678,690) (4,353,520) ------------ ------------ ------------ Net (Decrease) Increase in Cash Flows .................... (149,513) (1,312,111) 1,249,561 Cash at Beginning of Year ................................ 1,988,785 1,839,272 527,161 ------------ ------------ ------------ Cash at End of Year ...................................... $ 1,839,272 $ 527,161 $ 1,776,722 ============ ============ ============ Supplemental Disclosure of Cash Flow Information: Taxes Paid ............................................. $ 627,773 $ 192,652 $ 1,446,000 ============ ============ ============
(See Notes to Financial Statements) F-25 PERRY ELLIS INTERNATIONAL, INC. NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1996, 1997, AND 1998 1. DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS The Company was incorporated on September 12, 1978 and operates as a licensor. Its income consists primarily of royalties received from licensees under licensing agreements. Revenues to a major customer accounted for approximately 36% in 1997 and 1998. 2. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES USE OF ESTIMATES The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles requires Management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS The Company's financial instruments include cash, receivables and payables, for which carrying amounts approximate fair value due to the short-term nature of the instruments. FIXED ASSETS Fixed Assets consist of fixtures, equipment and improvements and are stated at cost. Depreciation is computed using the straight-line basis over the estimated useful life of the assets. The useful lives range from five to ten years. Maintenance and Repairs are expensed as incurred. Expenditures for major renewals are capitalized. Upon the sale, replacement or retirement of assets, the cost and accumulated depreciation or amortization thereon are removed from the accounts. INCOME TAXES The Company has qualified as a small business ("S") corporation under the Internal Revenue Code. The federal income tax effect of income and losses is passed through to the stockholders. Consequently, there is no provision for federal income taxes in the financial statements. However, the Company is subject to state and local income taxes in certain taxing districts in which it does business. F-26 PERRY ELLIS INTERNATIONAL, INC. NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(CONTINUED) YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1996, 1997, AND 1998 3. CASH BALANCES Cash balances consist of the following: 1997 1998 ----------- ----------- Cash in Checking and Savings Accounts ........... $519,972 $1,559,711 Cash in Pierpont Money Market Accounts .......... 7,189 217,011 -------- ---------- Total ........................................... $527,161 $1,776,722 ======== ========== 4. DUE FROM LICENSEES The balance due from licensees in the amount of $944,885 represents charges of advertising and other expenses advanced for the account of the individual licensees of the Company. 5. PREPAID EXPENSES The prepaid expense balance consists of the following: 1997 1998 ----------- ---------- Deposit for Advertising Campaign ............... $197,785 $ 75,718 Deposit Paid for Photoshoots ................... 424,441 444,365 Deposit for Outdoor Systems Billboard .......... -0- 20,486 Deposit for Trade Shows ........................ 116,592 -0- Other Expenses ................................. 19,353 2,814 -------- -------- Total .......................................... $758,171 $543,383 ======== ======== 6. PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT Property and equipment balances consist of the following:
1997 1998 ------------- ------------- Furniture, fixtures and equipment ........................ $ 420,329 $ 437,763 Leasehold improvements ................................... 1,575,488 1,579,195 ---------- ---------- 1,995,817 2,016,958 Less: accumulated depreciation and amortization .......... (647,380) (875,444) ---------- ---------- Total .................................................... $1,348,437 $1,141,514 ========== ==========
7. ACCRUED PAYROLL Accrued Payroll consists of incentive bonuses earned by executives during the calendar year and payable in the following year. 8. PENSION PLAN The Company has a Money Purchase and Profit Sharing Plan in effect. All employees are eligible to participate in both plans upon the completion of one year of service and reaching the age of 21. The Company is required to contribute 10% of the compensation of all participants to the Money Purchase Pension Plan on an annual basis. There is no contribution requirement for the Proft Sharing Plan. Employees are not required to contribute to either plan. The contributions for the calendar year 1997 aggregated $127,066 and for 1998, $66,265. F-27 PERRY ELLIS INTERNATIONAL, INC. NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(CONTINUED) YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1996, 1997, AND 1998 9. RENTS The Company leases its executive and design offices. As at December 31, 1998, total minimum rentals are approximately as follows: 1999 ............... $215,000 2000 ............... 230,000 2001 ............... 246,000 Thereafter ......... 478,000 Rent expense for this lease amounted to approximately $196,000, $197,000 and $219,000 for the years ended December 31, 1996, 1997 and 1998, respectively. 10. SUBSEQUENT EVENT In January 1999, the Company's sole shareholder agreed to sell 100% of the Company's outstanding common stock to Supreme International Corporation for approximately $75 million in cash. The sale is expected to close in April 1999. F-28 UNAUDITED PRO FORMA COMBINED FINANCIAL INFORMATION INTRODUCTION The following sets forth the Unaudited Pro Forma Combined Financial Information of Supreme as of and for the fiscal year ended January 31, 1999, giving effect to the Perry Ellis acquisition under the "purchase" method of accounting, and the Rule 144A offering of an aggregate principal amount of $100.0 million in senior subordinated notes due 2009. Supreme's Unaudited Pro Forma Combined Income Statement Information presents the acquisition of Perry Ellis International, Inc. and the Rule 144A offering as if they had been consummated on February 1, 1998. The Unaudited Pro Forma Combined Balance Sheet Information of Supreme presents the Perry Ellis International acquisition and the Rule 144A offering as if they had been consummated on January 31, 1999. The Unaudited Pro Forma Combined Financial Information of the combined companies are presented for illustrative purposes only, and therefore do not purport to present the financial position or results of operations of Supreme had the Perry Ellis International acquisition and the Rule 144A offering occurred on the dates indicated, nor are they necessarily indicative of the results of operations which may be expected to occur in the future. The historical financial information for Supreme and Perry Ellis International, Inc. has been derived from the audited financial statements of Supreme and Perry Ellis International, Inc., respectively, included in Item 8. The pro forma adjustments relating to the acquisition and integration of Perry Ellis International, Inc. represent Supreme's preliminary determinations of these adjustments and are based upon available information and certain assumptions Supreme considers reasonable under the circumstances. Final amounts could differ from those set forth herein. The Unaudited Pro Forma Combined Financial Information does not give effect to the pending John Henry/Manhattan acquisition and the related Phillips-Van Heusen transactions. See "Item 6. Selected Financial Data--Summary Pro Forma and Supplemental Financial Information." F-29 UNAUDITED PRO FORMA COMBINED FINANCIAL INFORMATION BALANCE SHEET BALANCE SHEET JANUARY 31, 1999
HISTORICAL(1) PRO FORMA --------------------------- ---------------------------------- SUPREME PERRY ELLIS ADJUSTMENTS(2) COMBINED ----------- ------------- -------------------- ----------- (DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS) ASSETS Current Assets: Cash ............................................. $ 174 $ 1,777 $ (1,777)(a) $ 174 Accounts receivable, net ......................... 38,970 945 -- 39,915 Inventories ...................................... 32,966 -- -- 32,966 Deferred income taxes ............................ 1,091 -- -- 1,091 Deposits for acquisitions ........................ 6,000 -- (5,000)(b) 1,000 Other current assets ............................. 2,040 667 (75)(c) 2,632 -------- -------- -------- -------- Total Current Assets .......................... 81,241 3,389 (6,852) 77,778 Property and equipment, net ....................... 7,852 1,142 (900)(d) 8,094 Intangible assets, net ............................ 18,843 -- 74,104 (e) 92,947 Other assets ...................................... 1,022 32 3,479 (f) 4,533 -------- -------- -------- -------- Total Assets .................................. $108,958 $ 4,563 $ 69,831 $183,352 ======== ======== ======== ======== LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY Current Liabilities: Accounts payable ................................. $ 4,596 $ 163 -- $ 4,759 Accrued expenses ................................. 4,931 561 -- 5,492 Other current liabilities ........................ 414 -- $ 640 (g) 1,054 -------- -------- -------- --------- Total Current Liabilities ..................... 9,941 724 640 11,305 Deferred income taxes ............................. 560 -- -- 560 Senior Credit Facility ............................ 33,511 -- (26,970)(h) 6,541 Notes offered in the Rule 144A offering ........... -- -- 100,000 (i) 100,000 -------- -------- -------- -------- Total Liabilities ............................. 44,012 724 73,670 118,406 Stockholders' equity .............................. 64,946 3,839 (3,839)(j) 64,946 -------- -------- -------- -------- Total Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity..... $108,958 $ 4,563 $ 69,831 $183,352 ======== ======== ======== ========
See Notes to Unaudited Pro Forma Combined Financial Information. F-30 UNAUDITED PRO FORMA COMBINED FINANCIAL INFORMATION INCOME STATEMENT YEAR ENDED JANUARY 31, 1999
HISTORICAL(1) PRO FORMA ----------------------------- ----------------------------------- SUPREME PERRY ELLIS ADJUSTMENTS(3) COMBINED ------------- ------------- ------------------- ------------- (DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS) Net sales ............................................. $ 221,347 $ -- $ -- $ 221,347 Royalty income ........................................ 3,057 16,177 -- 19,234 --------- -------- -------- --------- Total revenues ........................................ 224,404 16,177 -- 240,581 Cost of sales ......................................... 166,198 -- -- 166,198 --------- -------- -------- --------- Gross profit .......................................... 58,206 16,177 -- 74,383 Selling, general, and administrative expenses ......... 41,639 8,594 1,059 (a) 51,292 --------- -------- -------- --------- Operating income ...................................... 16,567 7,583 (1,059) 23,091 Interest expense ...................................... 3,494 -- 9,298 (b) 12,792 --------- -------- -------- --------- Income before provision for income taxes .............. 13,073 7,583 (10,357) 10,299 Provision for income taxes ............................ 4,491 760 (954)(c) 4,297 --------- -------- -------- --------- Net income ............................................ $ 8,582 $ 6,823 $ (9,403) $ 6,002 ========= ======== ======== ========= Other Operating Data: Ratio of earnings to fixed charges(4) ................ 4.2x -- -- 1.8x Depreciation and amortization ........................ $ 2,161 $ 228 $ 3,525 $ 5,914 EBITDA(5) ............................................ $ 18,728 $ 7,811 $ 2,466 $ 29,005
See Notes to Unaudited Pro Forma Combined Financial Information. F-31 NOTES TO UNAUDITED PRO FORMA COMBINED FINANCIAL INFORMATION (DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS) (1) The year ended January 31, 1999 is Supreme's historical financial reporting period. For the pro forma year ended January 31, 1999 Perry Ellis International, Inc. financial information has been included as of and for the twelve months ended December 31, 1998 because they have historically reported on a calendar year end. Supreme believes the effect of the difference in these reporting periods is not significant and is not reflected in the Unaudited Pro Forma Combined Financial Information. (2) The purchase price is $75,000, adjusted for working capital less other agreed upon adjustments. Based upon the Perry Ellis International, Inc. December 31, 1998 balance sheet, the purchase price is calculated as follows: PURCHASE PRICE DETERMINATION: Gross purchase price .......................... $ 75,000 Net adjustments to purchase price ............. (449) -------- Net purchase price ......................... $ 74,551 ======== PURCHASE PRICE ALLOCATION: Current assets ................................ $ 1,537 Property, plant and equipment ................. 242 Other assets .................................. 32 Trademarks .................................... 74,104 Accounts payable and accrued expenses ......... (1,364) -------- Net purchase price ......................... $ 74,551 ======== For purposes of preparing the Unaudited Pro Forma Combined Balance Sheet, the Perry Ellis assets acquired and liabilities assumed have been recorded at their estimated fair values. A final determination of the required purchase accounting adjustments and of the fair value of the assets and liabilities of Perry Ellis International, Inc. acquired or assumed has not yet been made. Accordingly, the purchase accounting adjustments made in connection with the development of the unaudited pro forma financial information reflect the Company's best estimate based upon currently available information.
AS OF JANUARY 31, 1999 ----------------- (a) Cash balances of Perry Ellis International, Inc. which are not being acquired ............................................................. $ (1,777) (b) Deposit applied to Perry Ellis International acquisition ............. (5,000) (c) Other current assets of Perry Ellis International, Inc. which are not being acquired ....................................................... (75) (d) Property, plant and equipment have been adjusted to their estimated fair value ........................................................... (900) (e) Trademarks acquired .................................................. 74,104 (f) Deferred financing costs related to the notes offered in the Rule 144A offering ................................................... 3,479 (g) Liabilities assumed, including severance and acquisition costs payable ........................................................ 640 (h) Pay down of Senior Credit Facility ................................... (26,970) (i) Issuance of notes offered in the Rule 144A offering .................. 100,000 (j) Elimination of Perry Ellis International, Inc.'s stockholders' equity (3,839)
F-32 (3) The pro forma income statement data for the year ended January 31, 1999 present the effects of the Perry Ellis International acquisition and the Rule 144A offering, in each case as if they occurred as of the beginning of such period, including: (a) Adjustments to selling, general and administrative expenses: Decrease in depreciation expense to reflect the fair value and useful lives of the acquired property, plant and equipment ................................. $ (180) Amortization expense of trademarks (straight line--20 years) .................. 3,705 Elimination of consulting fees, licensing fees, severance costs, occupancy costs and employment costs that will not be incurred by the Company ........... (2,466) -------- Total adjustment to selling, general and administrative expenses ................ 1,059 -------- (b) The pro forma adjustments to interest expense arising from the Perry Ellis International acquisition and the offering of the notes in the Rule 144A offering are presented below: Reduction of interest expense related to the: Lower balance outstanding under the credit facility (at 7.60%) ................ (2,050) Additional interest cost related to: The notes offered in the Rule 144A offering ................................... 11,000 Amortization of deferred financing costs ...................................... 348 -------- Total adjustment to interest expense ............................................ 9,298 -------- (c) Adjustment to the provision for income taxes at an effective rate of 34.4% ...... (954) -------- Total adjustment to income statement ............................................ $ 9,403 ========
In addition to the above, the company believes additional cost savings will be realized through the combination of the two companies. (4) For purpose of computing this ratio, earnings consist of earnings before income taxes and fixed charges. Fixed charges consist of interest expense, amortization of deferred debt issuance costs and the portion of rental expense of the Lease deemed representative of the interest factor. (5) EBITDA represents net income before taking into consideration interest expense, income tax expense, depreciation expense, and amortization expense. EBITDA is not a measurement of financial performance under generally accepted accounting principles and does not represent cash flow from operations. Accordingly, do not regard this figure as an alternative to net income or as an indicator of our operating performance or as an alternative to cash flows as a measure of liquidity. We believe that EBITDA is widely used by analysts, investors and other interested parties in our industry but is not necessarily comparable with similarily titled measures for other companies. See "Statements of Cash Flow" in our consolidated financial statements and in the financial statements of Perry Ellis International, Inc. contained elsewhere in this Item 8. F-33 EXHIBIT INDEX
EXHIBIT NO. DESCRIPTION - -------- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 3.1 Registrant's Second Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation 10.27 Amendment to Amended and Restated Loan and Security Agreement dated as of August 1, 1998------------- EXHIBIT NUMBER DESCRIPTION - --------------- ----------- 4.6 Indenture dated March 22, 2002 between the Company and State Street Bank and Trust Company 4.7 Purchase Agreement dated March 15, 2002 by and among the Company and the Initial Purchaser 4.8 Pledge and Security Agreement dated March 22, 2002 by and among the Company, Jantzen Apparel Corp. and State Street Bank and Trust Company 4.9 Specimen Forms of 9 1/2% Senior Secured Notes due March 15, 2009 10.35 Employment Agreement between Timothy B. Page and the Company 10.38 Fifth Amendment dated March 14, 2002 to Amended and Restated Loan and Security Agreement dated March 26, 1999 10.39 Fourth Amendment to Master Agreement dated March 14, 2002, by and among the Company, SUP Joint Venture, SunTrust Bank and Israeli Discount Bank 21.1 Subsidiaries of Registrant 23.2 Consent of Deloitte & Touche LLP 27.1 Financial Data Schedule (SEC use only)