SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                             Washington, D.C. 20549


                                    FormFORM 10-K

(Mark  One)
[X]     ANNUAL  REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE  ACT  OF  1934
For  the  fiscal  year  ended  December  31,  20012002
                                       OR

[  ]     TRANSITION  REPORT  PURSUANT  TO  SECTION  13  OR  15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES  EXCHANGE  ACT  OF    1934  [NO  FEE  REQUIRED]
For  the  transition  period  ________  to  ________

                     Commission File Number 1-12368

                        THE LEATHER FACTORY, INC.
          (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

              Delaware                               75-2543540
  (State or other jurisdiction(STATE OR OTHER JURISDICTION OF             (I.R.S. Employer
of incorporation or organization)                         Identification Number)EMPLOYER
   INCORPORATION  OR  ORGANIZATION)            IDENTIFICATION NUMBER)

     3847 East Loop 820 South
         Fort Worth, Texas                           76119
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)

       Registrant's telephone number, including area code:(ADDRESS OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICES)           (ZIP CODE)

  REGISTRANT'S TELEPHONE NUMBER, INCLUDING AREA CODE: (817) 496-4414

    Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

     Title of Each Class               Name of Each Exchange on Which Registered
     -------------------SECURITIES REGISTERED PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(B) OF THE ACT:

 TITLE  OF  EACH  CLASS       NAME OF EACH EXCHANGE ON WHICH REGISTERED
 ----------------------       -----------------------------------------
Common Stock, par value $.0024       American Stock Exchange

     Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
                                      NoneSECURITIES REGISTERED PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(G) OF THE ACT:
                                  NONE

      Indicate  by  check  mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports
required  to  be  filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934  during  the  preceding  12  months  (or  for  such shorter period that the
registrant  was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such
filing  requirements  for  the  past  90  days.  Yes  [X]  No  [  ]

     Indicate  by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item
405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the
best  of  registrant's  knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements
incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this
Form  10-K.  [X][  ]

     The  aggregate  market  value of the common stock held by non-affiliates of
the  registrant  was  approximately  $7,797,859$9,793,833  at March 11, 2002.2003. At that date
there  were  10,011,16110,197,961  shares  of  Common  Stock  outstanding.

                       DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

     Certain  portions  of  the  Registrant's definitive Proxy Statement for the
Annual  Meeting  of Stockholders to be held on May 23, 2002,15, 2003, are incorporated by
reference  in  Part  III  of  this  report.

                                        1


                                     PART I

ITEM  1.  BUSINESS.BUSINESS
- -----------------------------------

     As  used  in this Report, the terms "we," "us," "our," "TLF," "management,"
and  the  "Company"  mean The Leather Factory, Inc. and its subsidiaries (unless
the  context  indicates  a  different  meaning).

GeneralGENERAL

     The  Leather  Factory,  Inc.  is  a Delaware corporation whose common stock
trades  on  the  American Stock Exchange under the symbol "TLF." The Company was
first  incorporated  under  the  laws  of  the  State  of  Colorado  in 1984 and
reincorporated  under  the  laws  of  the  State  of  Delaware  in  June  1994.

     We  are an international  marketera wholesale distributor and wholesale  distributorretailer of a broad line of leather and
related  products,  including  leather,  leatherworking  tools,  buckles  and
adornments  for  belts, leather dyes and finishes, shoe  repair
supplies,   saddle and tack hardware, and
do-it-yourself  kits.  Also,  weWe  also manufacture and distribute fancy hat trims, leather lacing and kits. The Company
distributessells  its  products  worldwide  through  30 sales27 Leather Factory stores and distribution  units19 Tandy
Leather  stores  (as  of  March  31,  2003),  located throughout the U.S.  and, three
combination  Leather Factory/Tandy Leather stores located in Canada, and through
its  websites  (www.leatherfactory.com)  and  (www.tandyleather.com).  Our
subsidiary,  Tandy  Leather
Company,    via   2   retail    storesRoberts,  Cushman  &  Co., designs and mail/telephone/website    orders
(http://www.tandyleather.com).manufactures fancy hat trims
directly  to  hat  manufacturers.

     The  Company  sells its products  worldwide and  is  managed on a business entity basis, with those businesses
being The Leather Factory ("Leather Factory"), Tandy Leather Company ("Tandy" or
"Tandy Leather"), and Roberts, Cushman & Company, Inc. ("Cushman").  See Note 13 Segment  Information12
to the Consolidated Financial Statements, Segment Information, for financial and
additional information concerning the Company's segments.segments, as well as its foreign
operations.

     We  frequently  introduce new products either through our own manufacturing
capability or by purchasing from vendors. The Company holds a substantial number
of  copyrights  for its designs. These designs have been incorporated throughout
the  Company's  product line as a means of increasing its competitive advantage.

     Late in 2001,In  2002,  the  Company announced  its plans to openbegan opening retail stores under the Tandy Leather
name.name  and  had  fourteen  stores  opened  as  of the end of the year.  The Tandy
Leather  retail store concept differs from that of a traditional Leather Factory
store.  Tandy stores are designed to attract walk-in retail customers primarily,
while Leather Factory stores, although they can and do service retail customers,
generally  tend  to  target  wholesale  customers.

         As part of its original  strategy to develop a multi-location  chain of
wholesale  units,  thecustomers  including  manufacturers  and
resellers.

     The  Company  has  made numerous acquisitions in prior years.
These  acquisitions have includedyears, including the
purchase  of  the  six wholesale unitsoriginal Leather Factory stores from Brown Group, Inc. in
1985.  The Company  also  acquired  several  businesses  located
throughout the United States that distribute  shoe-related  supplies to the shoe
repair and shoe store  industry.  In 1995, the Company purchased Cushman,  a
leading  producer of hat trims.Cushman. In 1996, the Company acquired all of the issued
and outstanding capital stock of its
Canadian  distributor, The Leather Factory of Canada, Ltd. In November 2000, the
Company  acquired  the operating assets of two subsidiaries of Tandycrafts, Inc.
to  form  the Tandy Leather Company subsidiary. In 2002, Tandy Leather purchased
four  independent  leathercraft  retail  stores.

     No  single  customer's  purchases  represent more than 10% of the Company's
total  sales  in  2001.2002.  Approximately 5%5.6% of our 20012002 sales were export sales.

     The  Company's  principal  offices are located at 3847 East Loop 820 South,
Fort  Worth,  Texas  76119,  and  its  phone  number  is  (817)  496-4414.
                                        2



Leather Factory OperationsLEATHER  FACTORY  OPERATIONS

     The  Leather  Factory  located in Fort Worth,  Texas,  distributes  its  broad  product line of leather and
leathercraft-related  products  in  the  United  States and internationally.  We
manufacture  some  of our products, while the majority of products are purchased
from  manufacturers.  The Leather Factory line
includes small finished  leather goods such as cigar cases,  wallets and western
accessories  distributed  under the name,  Royal  Crown  Custom  LeatherTM.  The
Leather  Factory  lineoperations accounted for 77.0%76.3%, 89.9%77.0%, and
91.1%89.9%  of  the  total  consolidated net sales of the Company for 2002, 2001, and
2000,  and 1999, respectively.

     Business  Strategy.BUSINESS  STRATEGY.     We  distribute  Leather Factory products through its
30  sales/distribution  units ("Units") located in twenty states and Canada,27
U.S.-based  stores,  three  Canadian-based  stores,  and  through  itsour  web site.site
(www.leatherfactory.com).  The  location  of the Unitsstores is selected based on the
location  of  customers,  so  that  delivery  time to customers is minimized.  A
two-day  maximum  delivery  time  is  the  Company's goal.  In addition to offering its
customers  rapid  delivery,  Leather  Factory also offers a "one-stop  shopping"
concept for both leather and leathercraft  materials.  The Units are designed to
combine  the  economies  of  scale of  warehouse  locations  with the  marketing
efficiencies  that can be achieved  through  direct  mail.  The type of premises
utilized  for the Unitstore locations is generally light industrial office/warehouse
space  in  proximity to a major freeway or with other similar access.  This kind
of  location typically offers lower rents compared to other more retail-oriented
locations.

     Leather Factory stores offer a "one-stop shopping" concept for both leather
and  leathercraft  materials.  Our  strategy is that a customer can purchase the
leather  and  related accessories and supplies necessary to complete his project
from  one  place.  The size and configuration of the Unitsstores are planned to allow
large quantities of product to be displayed in an easily accessible and visually
appealing manner.  Leather is displayed by the pallet where the customer can see
and  touch  it,  assessing  first-hand  the  numerous  sizes, styles, and grades
of
leather and leather goods.offered.

     Leather  Factory  Unitsstores  serve  customers  through various means including
walk-in  traffic,  phone  and  mail  order.  Both wholesale and retail customers
purchase  from  these Units.  Authorized Sales Centers  (discussed below), as well
as  the  craft,  western  and  other  retail  establishments  located  in  close
geographic proximity to a particular Unit, are serviced from that Unit as well.stores.

     We  staff  Leather  Factory  Unitsstores  with  experienced  managers  whose
compensation is tied to the operating profit of their location.store. Sales from the
Units are generated
by  the selling efforts of the locationstore personnel themselves, the aggressive use of
direct  mail  advertising, participation by the Company at trade shows and, on a
limited  basis,  the  use  of  sales  representative  organizations and the aggressive use of direct mail advertising.organizations.

     Our  primary  advertising efforts are through direct mail advertising aimed
at  specific market groups. Like most direct mail marketers, our mailing list is
one  of  our  most  important assets. Over the years, we have spent considerable
time  and  money  maintaining  and  updating  this  list.  As  a result, we have
developed  what we consider to be the purest, most up-to-date, unique collection
of  leathercraft customers' names and purchase information found anywhere in the
world.  Our  mailing  list  has  been  the key to our sales in the past and will
continue  to be the key in the future. We estimate that in 2002,2003, we will produce
and  mail  8035-40  different  direct  mail  pieces  from a simple black and white
postcard  to  our  140-page  full  color  catalog.

     Customers.CUSTOMERS.  Leather  Factory's  customer  base is comprised of individuals,
wholesale  distributors,  tack  and  saddle  shops,  shoe repair shops,  institutions  (prisons  and
prisoners,  schools,  hospitals),  dealer stores,  western  stores, craft stores and craft store
chains,  hat manufacturers and distributors,  other  large  volume purchasers, manufacturers, and retailers dispersed
geographically throughout the world. Wholesale sales make up the majority of our
Leather  Factory  business, while retail sales have  historically  been less than 10% of
Leather  Factory sales.  During the last few years,although retail sales have increased somewhat resulting in a shift in our sales mix. In 1999, ourduring
the  last  several years. Generally speaking, Leather Factory's sales mix was 85%
wholesale  and 15% retail.  In 2000 and 2001,  the mix wasis 80%
wholesale  and 20%


                                       3
 retail. We are continuing efforts to attract the retail customercustomers
to  Leather Factory; however, the strongest market for this  lineLeather Factory continues
to  be  the  wholesale  customer. Leather Factory sales generally do not reflect
significant  seasonal  patterns.  Orders  are  filled  as  received, and Leather
Factory  does  not  have  any backlogs. We maintain inventory at a level that we
believe  will  fill  most  customer  orders.

     Leather  Factory's Authorized Sales Center ("ASC") program was developed to
generate  sales  in  geographical  areas  where we currently do not have a sales/distribution  unitstore
without  the  capital  investment  needed  to  open  one.  An  unrelated  person
operating  an  existing  business  who  desires to become an ASC must apply with
Leather  Factory  and  upon  approval, place a minimum initial order.  There are
also minimum annual purchase amounts set that the ASC must adhere to in order to
maintain ASC status.  In exchange, the ASC gets free advertising in certain sale
flyers,  price breaks on many products, advance notice of new products, priority
shipping and handling on all orders, as well as various other benefits.  Expansion.Leather
Factory  stores  service  approximately  110 ASC's located throughout the United
States.

     EXPANSION.  We  opened four new Leather Factory Unitsstores in 1999, and two new
Unitsstores  in  each  of the years 2000 and 2001. Our current plans are to continueWhile we do not believe there is a
significant and immediate opportunity for expansion conservatively  by: (i)of the Leather Factory store
system  in  terms of opening Units as and when such  additions are
determined feasible; and (ii)additional stores, we do believe expansion could be
achieved by acquiring companies in related areas/markets which offer synergistic
aspects  based  on  the  locations  and/or  product  lines  of  the  businesses.
                                        Tandy Leather Operations3


TANDY  LEATHER  OPERATIONS

     Tandy  Leather Company  located in Fort Worth, Texas, bears the name of the oldest and best-known supplier
of  leather  and related supplies used in the leathercraft industry. Established
in 1919, originally as Hinkley-Tandy Leather Company, Tandy Leather has been the
primary  resource  for over fourfive generations of leathercrafters. This subsidiary
offers  a product line of quality tools, leather, accessories, kits and teaching
materials.

     As  noted  above,  we  acquired  the Tandy Leather assets in November 2000.
Tandy  Leather accounted for 18.6%, 17.7% and 1.9% of the total consolidated net
sales  of  the  Company  for  2002,  2001,  and  2000,  respectively.

     Business  Strategy.  Tandy Leather sells its products through a central
call  center  that  handles   phone,   mail  and  fax  orders,   our  web  site,
www.tandyleather.com,  and  approximately  70 U.S.  authorized  dealers.  Orders
placed  through the call center and Internet are  processed and shipped from our
Fort Worth distribution center. Typically, 80% of our business arrives by phone,
fax or mail orders. The other 20% comes through the web site. Additionally,  our
products are sold in Canada through an existing Leather Factory location,  which
also  supports   approximately  75  Tandy  Leather  authorized  dealers  located
throughout the Canadian provinces.BUSINESS  STRATEGY.  Tandy  Leather  did not own any retail stores when its
assets  were  acquired  by  the  Company.Company  and  was  operating  as a catalog/mail
order/Internet  fulfillment house.  At one time, however, Tandy Leather ownedoperated
approximately 350 retail stores located throughout the United States and Canada.
We believeBelieving  that  Tandy  Leather stores are a viable optionvehicle for growth, and in 2002,  we announced twobegan
opening  Tandy  Leather  retail  locations -- Oklahoma City, Okla.stores in 2002.  As of December 31, 2002, there
were  14  retail stores located in the United States. More information about the
growth  and  Boise,
Idaho.expansion  of  the  Tandy  retail  store  chain is explained below.

     The  retail  stores  serve  walk-in,  mail  and  phone order customers from
convenient  locations  in  established  retail areas.areas as well as orders generated
from  its  website,  www.tandyleather.com.  The  Tandy  stores  also  service
approximately 120 authorized dealers located throughout the United States. Tandy
Leather  stores  are staffed by knowledgeable sales people whose compensation is
based,  in part, upon the profitability of their store. More  information  about expansion plans is
explained below.Our products are sold in
Canada  through  the  three  Leather  Factory  stores located there. These three
stores  support  approximately  40  Tandy  Leather  authorized  dealers  located
throughout  the  Canadian  provinces.

     Sales  by  Tandy Leather are driven through the efforts of the call
center and store staff,
trade  shows,  our 132-page catalog and a direct marketing program that includes
35-40 different sales flyers produced annually and e-mail announcements. MaintainingTandy's
mailing  list  is  similar  to  that  of The Leather Factory in that maintaining
detailed  customer  history allows us to target certain customer segments in our
mailings.  We are in the process of expanding the information  maintained in the
Tandy Leather  customer  mailing list to match the detail  maintained by Leather
Factory,  as we believe we can more  effectively  market to  customer  groups by
tracking the additional  information.  This provides significant opportunity for sales retention and growth.


                                       4


     Tandy  Leather has long been the entry point for new customers getting into
leathercraft.  We  continue to broaden our customer base by working with various
youth  organizations  and  institutions  where  people  are  introduced  to
leathercraft,  as  well  as  hosting  classes  in  the  retail  stores.

     Customers.CUSTOMERS.  Tandy's  customer  base  is  comprised  mostly  of  individual
hobbyists  but  also  includes  a  number  of  resellers,  small  manufacturers,
institutions  and  dealers. Individual retail customers are our largest customer
segment,group,  representing  over 50%more  than  65%  of  Tandy  Leather sales. Youth camps and
schools,  Authorized  Dealers  represent another  significant  segment(similar  to  Leather  Factory's Authorized Sales
Centers)  and  our  wholesale customers complete our customer base. Like Leather
Factory, Tandy fills orders as they are received, and there is no order backlog.
Tandy  maintains  reasonable  amounts  of  our sales
at approximately  18%. Dealers are independent  retail businesses that have been
authorizedinventory  to  sell our products in their store and do business as "Tandy Leather
Dealers." This allows us to have our products  distributed  in  communities  and
countries where maintaining a physical presence would be cost prohibitive.

         Other important  customer  segments  include  youth-related  groups and
camps  representing   approximately  7%  of  sales  and  international  business
representing  about 5% of sales.meet  these  orders.

     Tandy's  sales,  when  operating  strictly  as  an  order fulfillment house
(phone,  fax,  mail,  and  Internet orders), are generally consistent quarter to
quarter  (25%  per  quarter).  Its retail store operations historically generatedgenerate
slightly more sales in the 4th quarter of each year (approximately 30%) and less
in  the  2nd  quarter  (approximately 20%) while the 1st and 3rd quarters remainedremain
steady  at  25%.

     Expansion.EXPANSION.  In  December 2001, The Leather Factory, Inc. announced plans to
expand  the  Tandy  Leather  lineoperation through the introduction of Tandy Leather
retail  stores.  This expansion began with acquisitions ofWe  opened  fourteen  retail stores in 2002 - four by acquiring
existing  leathercraft stores, in both January and February 2002. Tandy anticipates that it will add two
to five additional retail stores during 2002nine by opening new stores, and acquiring
existing leathercraftone by converting
a  Leather  Factory store. Management expects to open a similar number of retail
stores  as opportunities arise with attractive terms.

Roberts, Cushman Subsidiaryin  2003.
                                        4


ROBERTS,  CUSHMAN  SUBSIDIARY

     Cushman  is  located  in  Long  Island  City,  N.Y., and produces and sells
headwear adornments (decorations that adorn the outside of a hat), manufacturing
made-to-order  trimmings  for  the headwear industry for over 140 years. Cushman
accounted  for  5.3%5.1%,  8.2%5.3%, and 8.9%8.2% of the total consolidated net sales of the
Company  for  2002,  2001,  and  2000,  and 1999, respectively.

     Business Strategy.BUSINESS  STRATEGY.  Cushman has long been considered one of the leaders in
the field of headwear trimmings. It designs and manufactures exclusive trimmings
for all type of hats. Trims are sold to hat manufacturers directly. Cushman does
not  employ  an  outside sales force. Instead, customers visit the facilities in
New York and, with a Cushman designer, incorporate their ideas into a customized
product.  The  customer is provided samples or photographs of each design before
they  leave  the  premises.  Customerpremises who can then use the sample as a sales tool to obtain
orders.hat  orders from their customers. This "design-on-site" process is unique in the
industry.

     Customers.CUSTOMERS.  Currently,  there  are  approximately  90  to  100  headwear
manufacturers  worldwide.  Cushman designs and manufactures trims for over 75 of
those  manufacturers,  supplying  customized  trims,  as well as ribbons, buckle
sets,  name  pins,  feathers,  etc.  Our  success  in developing and maintaining
long-standing  relationships  with our customers is due primarily to our ability
to  deliver  quality products in a timely manner. Generally, our delivery target
is  three  weeks or less. Cushman's backlog of in-house orders from the
manufacturers  is  consistently  20-30 days.customers as
of March 14, 2003 was $180,000, which approximates one month of sales. Cushman's
sales  generally  do  not  reflect  significant  seasonal  patterns.

     5


         Expansion.EXPANSION.  Cushman  has  been very successful providing a very specific product
line directly to headwear manufacturers. Given the current conditions, we do not
believe  that  there  is  much room for expansion in the industry, other than to
capture additional market share. We have considered the possibility of expanding
production  to  other  leather  products.  However,  even  though  the potential
products  would  be  made from leather and therefore could be considered somehow
related,  we  have  decided  that Cushman's expansion into other products is not
feasible  at  this  time.
                                        Additional Information

         Products.5


ADDITIONAL  INFORMATION

     PRODUCTS.  Our  core  business  consists  of  manufacturing,  importing and
distributing  leather,  traditional leathercraft materials (do-it-yourself kits,
stamping  sets,  and  leatherworking  tools), craft-related items (leather lace,
beads,  and wearable art accessories), hardware, metal garment accessories (belt
buckles, belt buckle designs, and conchos), shoe care and repair supplies,  and leather finishes.  We attempt to
maintain  the  optimum  number  of  stock-keeping  units ("SKUs") in the Leather
Factory and Tandy Leather lines to balance proper stock maintenance and minimizingminimize
out-of-stock  situations  against carrying costs involved with such an inventory
level.  We  try  to  maintain  higher  inventories  of certain imported items to
ensure  a  continuous  supply.

     The  number  of SKUs has been refined over the years by the introduction of
new  products  and  the  discontinuing of selected products. The Company carries
approximately  3,6003,400  items  in the current lines of leather and leather-related
merchandise  -  1,000800  of  which  are  exclusively  Leather  Factory products, 800
exclusively  Tandy  Leather and 1,800 carried by both Leather Factory and Tandy.

     The  products manufactured by the Company generally involve cutting leather
into  various  shapes  and  patterns using metal dies ("clicking"), fabrication,
assembly,  and  packaging/repackaging  tasks.  Items  made  in  Fort  Worth  are
primarily  distributed  under  the  TejasTM  brand  name  through  Leather Factory's
sales/distribution units.our  stores.

     Cushman's  hat  bands  are  generally  made  from leather, ribbon, or woven
fabrics,  depending on the style of hat. They are made by cutting leather and/or
other  materials into strips, and enhancing the trim by attaching conchos and/or
three-piece  buckle  sets,  braiding  with other materials, finishing the end or
borders  by  stitching  or  by  lacing  with leather lace. Cushman also supplies
custom-designed  buckles and conchos separate from the bands, feathers for dress
hats,  and  name  pins.

     Patents,  Copyrights.PATENTS,  COPYRIGHTS.  We  presently  own  496  copyrights  covering  605
registered  works,  twenty  trademarks  covering  twenty  names, and two patents
covering  three  products.  Registered  trademarks  include  federal  trade name
registrations  on  The"The  Leather  FactoryFactory"  and  Tandy"Tandy  Leather  Company.Company".  The
trademarks  expire at various times starting in 20022005 and ending in 2010,2012, but can
be  renewed  indefinitely.  Most  copyrights  granted  or  pending  are on metal
products,  such  as  conchos,  belt  buckles,  instruction  books, and kits. The
expiration  period  for  the  copyrights  begins  in  2062 and ends in 2072. The
Company  has  patents  on two belt buckles and certain leather-working equipment
known  as  the  "Speedy Embosser." The patents expire in 2011. We consider these
intangibles  to  be  valuable  assets  and  defend  them  as  necessary.

     Cushman's  products  are generally not copyrighted initially as hundreds of
new trim designs are continually in process.  Once a trim has been selected by a
manufacturercustomer  for  production, has been completed for a line of hats, and has been a
strong  seller  for  the  season,  selected  components  in  the  trim are often
transferred  to  Leather Factory, adapted to fit Leather Factory's product line,
and  copyrighted.  Given  that the apparel market designs and produces styles at
least  six  months  in  advance of a particular season, Cushman's product design
contributes  to  Leather Factory's development of new products as we get insight
into  what  styles  are  expected  to  be  popular  in  the  near  future.

     Suppliers.SUPPLIERS.  We  currently  purchase  merchandise  and  raw  materials  from
approximately  200  vendors  dispersed  throughout the United States as well asand in 21more
than  20  foreign  countries.  In  2001,2002,  the  ten largest vendors accounted for
approximately  65%75%  of Leather Factory's and Tandy Leather's combined purchases.


                                       6

Because  leather is sold internationally, market conditions abroad are likely to
affect  the  price  of  leather  in the United States.  Outbreaks of mad cow and
hoof-and-mouth disease (or foot-and-mouth disease) in certain parts of the world
can  influence the price of leather used in our products.  We  experienced
this situation  during the early part of 2001 and believe we managed our leather
costs  satisfactorily  so as not to  significantly  affect our  customers or our
profits.  We did this by  anticipating  price  increases  and making  additional
purchases before the anticipated increases could take effect.  As such an occurrence
is  beyond the control of the Company, we cannot predict when and to what extent
we  could  be  affected  in the future.  Aside from increasing purchases when we
anticipate  price  increases (or possibly delaying purchases if we foresee price
declines),  we  do  not  attempt  to  hedge  our  inventory  costs.

     Cushman purchases components from over 5025 vendors, located predominately in
the  United  States.  In  2001,2002, Cushman's top ten vendors (in dollars purchased)
represented  approximately  50%40%  of  its  total  purchases.

     Overall, we believe that our relationships with suppliers are strong and do
not  anticipate  any  material  changes  in  these supplier relationships in the
future.  Due  to the number of alternative sources of supply, the loss of any or all of
these  principal  suppliers  would not have a material impact on our operations.

     Competition.COMPETITION.  We  sell  our  leather  and  leathercraft-related products in
three  highly fragmented markets --- leathercraft, leather accessories, and retail
craft.  We encounter competition in connection with certain product lines and in
certain areas from different companies, but have no direct competition affecting
the  entire product line.  We compete on price, availability of merchandise, and
speed  of  delivery.  Our  size  relative  to  most  of  our competitors creates
competitive  advantage  in our ability to stock a full range of products as well
as  in  buying  merchandise.  We  believe we have a competitive advantage on price in
most product lines because weare  able  to  purchase  in  bulk  and have an
international network of suppliers that can provide quality merchandise at lower
costs.  Most  of  our competitors do not have the multiple sources of supply and
cannot  purchase  sufficient  quantities  to  compete  along  a  broad  range of
products.  In fact, some of our competitors are also customers, relying on us as
a  supplier.

     Our Cushman line encounters some competition.  However, we are not aware of
any  single  company  whose  primary  product  line  is  the  same as Cushman's.
Cushman's market share has grown over the years because of its reputation in the
industry  to  deliver  product  timely.
                                        Compliance With Environmental Laws6


COMPLIANCE  WITH  ENVIRONMENTAL  LAWS

     Compliance  by  the  Company  with  federal,  state and local environmental
protection laws has not had, and is not expected to have, a material effect upon
capital  expenditures,  earnings  or  the  competitive  position of the Company.

EmployeesEMPLOYEES

     As  of  December  31,  2001,2002, the Company employed 283340 people, with 275323 on a
full-time  basis.  The  Company  is  not  a  party  to any collective bargaining
agreement.  Overall, management believes that relations with employees are good.

     Eligible  employees  participate  in  The  Leather Factory, Inc. Employees'
Stock  Ownership Plan and Trust ("ESOP"). As of December 31, 2001, 2122002, 232 employees
and  former  employees  were  participants  in or beneficiaries of the ESOP. The
Company  has  the  option  of  contributing  up  to  15%25%  of eligible employees'
compensation  into  the  ESOP.  Net  contributions for 2002, 2001, and 2000 and
1999 were
5.8%,  5.2%,  5.9%, and  5.6%5.9%,  respectively,  of  eligible  compensation.  These


                                       7

contributions  are  used  to  purchase  shares  of  the  Company's Common Stock.
Generally,  contributions  to  the  ESOP  follow  a  similar  pattern as overall
profitability.

Overall, management believes that relations with employees are good.

Executive Officers of the RegistrantEXECUTIVE  OFFICERS  OF  THE  REGISTRANT

The  following  table  sets  forth  certain information concerning the executive
officers  of  the  Company.
Position and Business Experience           Served as
    Name and Age               During Past Five Years              Officer Since
    ------------               ----------------------              -------------
J. Wray Thompson, 70    Chief Executive Officer since June 1993.
                        President from June 1993 to January 2001.       1993

Ronald C. Morgan, 54    President since January 2001.  Chief
                        Operating Officer since June 1993               1993

Robin L. Morgan, 51     Vice President of Administration since
                        June 1993.                                      1993

Shannon L. Greene, 36
POSITION AND BUSINESS EXPERIENCE NAME AND AGE DURING PAST FIVE YEARS SERVED AS OFFICER SINCE ------------ -------------------------------- ----------------------- J. Wray Thompson, 71 Chief Executive Officer since June 1993. President from June 1993 to January 2001. 1993 Ronald C.Morgan, 55 President since January 2001. Chief Operating Officer since June 1993. 1993 Robin L. Morgan, 52 Vice President of Administration since June 1993. 1993 Shannon L. Greene, 37 Chief Financial Officer since May 2000. Controller from January 1998 to May 2000. Assistant Controller from September 1997 to January 1998. 2000
Mr. and Mrs. Morgan are married. All officers are elected annually by the Board of Directors to serve for the ensuing year. 87 ITEM 2. PROPERTIES. - ---------------------- The Company leases all of its premises. Detailed below are the lease terms for the Company's locations. The general character of the Leather Factory ("LF") store locations is light industrial office/warehouse space. Tandy Leather ("TAN") store locations are generally found in retail strip centers. The Company believes that all of its properties are adequately covered by insurance. The Cushman facility ("RCC") is its manufacturing facility in Long Island City, New York. The Company's Fort Worth location includes the Fort Worth Leather Factory store, the Company's central warehouse and manufacturing facility, and the sales, advertising, administrative, and executive offices. The Company also leases a 284 square-foot showroom in the Denver Merchandise Mart for $5,372 per year. This lease will expire in October 2005.
ITEM 2. PROPERTIES. - --------------------- The Company leases all of its premises. Detailed below are the lease terms for the Company's locations. The general character of the Leather Factory ("LF") Unit locations is light industrial office/warehouse space. Tandy Leather ("TAN") retail store locations are generally found in retail strip centers. The Company believes that all of its properties are adequately covered by insurance. The Cushman facility ("RCC") is its manufacturing facility in Long Island City, New York.Location Total SpaceSquare Feet Minimum Annual Location Name (Sq. Ft.) Rent * Lease Expiration Lessee - ------------- ----------- -------------- ---------------- ------ Chattanooga, TN 9,040 $ 42,739 May 2004 LF Denver, CO 5,879 30,000 September 2004 LF Harrisburg, PA 6,850 40,05640,417 March 2007 LF Fort Worth, TX 101,000 376,633115,000 410,958 March 20032008 LF Fresno, CA 5,600 44,24544,456 March 2007 LF Des Moines, IA 4,000 30,718 April 2004 LF Phoenix, AZ 4,500 26,93227,053 March 2006 LF Springfield, MO 6,000 24,000 July 2003 LF Spokane, WA 5,400 21,360 February 2004 LF Albuquerque, NM 5,000 30,65531,200 October 2003 LF Salt Lake City, UT 3,485 23,09021,600 July 2004 LF Baldwin Park, CA 7,800 53,400 March 2005 LF Tampa, FL 5,238 41,254 March 200338,429 August 2008 LF San Antonio, TX 5,600 42,35242,256 October 2006 LF Columbus, OH 6,000 38,24738,461 October 2006 LF El Paso, TX 5,000 28,252 August 2003 LF Oakland, CA 8,000 54,000 December 2003 LF Grand Rapids, MI 8,000 42,38542,968 March 2004 LF Wichita, KS 5,150 21,360 MayApril 2004 LF New Orleans, LA 5,130 23,310 August22,200 September 2003 LF Portland, OR 5,232 31,61534,008 April 2004 LF Charlotte, NC 6,202 29,025 February 2006 LF Billings, MT 2,600 12,000 April 2004 LF Austin, TX 3,800 23,250 April 2005 LF Tucson, AZ 3,600 20,11021,033 May 2004 LF Houston, TX 4,250 25,30525,753 November 2005 LF Dallas, TX 5,040 27,36027,600 September 2005 LF Chicago, IL 6,100 31,14736,972 August 2006 LF Long Island City, NY 10,200 70,34471,146 June 2003 RCC Oklahoma City, OK 3,160 20,012 December 2006 TAN Boise, ID 1,800 16,200 February 2007 TAN Sacramento, CA 1,600 22,907 April 2007 TAN East Hartford, CT 1,200 9,600 May 2007 TAN Salt Lake City, UT 1,750 21,000 May 2007 TAN Fort Worth, TX 3,000 21,600 July 2007 TAN Austin, TX 3,800 23,250 April 2005 TAN Dallas, TX 1,700 23,052 July 2007 TAN Albuquerque, NM 1,764 16,229 August 2007 TAN Las Vegas, NV 1,350 20,250 June 2007 TAN Indianapolis, IN 1,500 17,727 October 2007 TAN Peoria, IL 1,350 14,833 October 2007 TAN Memphis, TN 2,500 15,000 September 2005 TAN Tempe, AZ 1,986 38,848 October 2007 TAN Baltimore, MD 2,200 16,901 January 2008 TAN Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada 5,712 15,680*18,376** November 20022007 LF Toronto, Ontario, Canada 5,614 22,159*21,968** June 2006 LF -------- -----------Edmonton, Alberta, Canada 5,210 21,572** August 2007 LF ----------------- ---------------------- Totals 274,182317,092 $ 1,362,995 ======== ===========1,682,689 ----------------- ----------------------
* Represents the average minimum annual rent over the balance of the unexpired lease term. ** As converted into U.S. dollars. The Company's Fort Worth location includes the Fort Worth Leather Factory Unit, the Company's central warehouse and manufacturing facility, Tandy Leather's offices and warehouse, and the sales and administrative/executive offices. The Company also leases a 284 square-foot showroom in the Denver Merchandise Mart for $5,364 per year. This lease will expire in October 2002. 98 ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS. - --------------------------------------------------------- The Company is involved in litigation in the ordinary course of its business but is not currently a party to any material pending legal proceedings. ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS. - ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ There were no matters submitted to a vote of the Company's security holders during the fourth quarter of the Company's fiscal year ended December 31, 2001.2002. PART II ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT'S COMMON EQUITY AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS. - -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- The Common Stock of the Company is traded on the American Stock Exchange using the symbol TLF. The high and low prices for each calendar quarter during the last two fiscal years are as follows: 2001 2000 ---- ---- Quarter Ended High Low High Low ------------- ---- --- ---- --- March 31, $1.1250 $0.9000 $1.6875 $0.8125 June 30, $2.2400 $0.9500 $1.5000 $0.9375 September 30, $3.0000 $1.8000 $1.4375 $0.9375 December 31, $2.3000 $1.7500 $1.5000 $0.9375
2002 2001 -------------- -------------- QUARTER ENDED HIGH LOW HIGH LOW - ------------- ------ ------ ------ ------ March 31 $3.850 $2.010 $1.125 $0.900 June 30 $3.500 $2.850 $2.240 $0.950 September 30 $3.240 $2.450 $3.000 $1.800 December 31 $3.500 $2.800 $2.300 $1.750
There were approximately 637644 stockholders of record on March 11, 2002.2003. There have been no cash dividends paid on the shares of the Company's Common Stock and currently dividends cannot be declared or paid without the prior written consent of Wells Fargo Business Credit, Inc.Minnesota, N.A., the Company's lender. The Board of Directors has historically followed a policy of reinvesting the earnings of the Company in the expansion of its business. This policy is subject to change based on future industry and market conditions, as well as other factors beyond the control of the Company. 109
ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA. The selected financial data presented below are derived from and should be read in conjunction with the Company's Consolidated Financial Statements and related notes. This information should also be read in conjunction with Item 7 - "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations." The financial impact of the acquisition of Tandy Leather Company in November 2000 is included in the information presented for 2000 and 2001.ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA. - ------------------------------------ The selected financial data presented below are derived from and should be read in conjunction with the Company's Consolidated Financial Statements and related notes. This information should also be read in conjunction with Item 7 - - "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations." In particular, see the information there relating to the adoption of a new accounting pronouncement in 2002. The financial impact of the acquisition of Tandy Leather Company in November 2000 is included in the information presented for 2002, 2001 and 2000. Data in prior years have not been restated to reflect acquisitions that occurred in subsequent years. Income Statement Data
INCOME STATEMENT DATA Years Ended December 31, ------------------------------------------------------------------------- 2001 2000 1999 1998 1997 ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ 2002 2001 2000 ----------------- ----------- ----------- Net sales $ 37,279,262 $ 30,095,264 $ 27,164,399 $ 22,163,994 $ 25,399,11639,728,615 $37,279,262 $30,095,264 Cost of sales 18,393,914 17,934,935 15,147,547 ----------------- ------------ ----------- Gross profit 21,334,701 19,344,327 14,947,717 Operating expenses 17,202,927 15,442,359 11,702,633 ------------------ ----------- ----------- Operating income 4,131,774 3,901,968 3,245,084 Other expense 311,918 533,482 653,779 ------------------ ----------- ----------- Income (loss) before income taxes 3,819,856 3,368,486 2,591,305 Income tax provision (benefit) 1,224,868 1,362,053 1,049,985 ------------------ ----------- ----------- Income (loss) before cumulative effect of change in accounting principle 2,594,988 2,006,433 1,541,320 Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle (4,008,831) - - ------------------ ----------- ----------- Net income (loss) $ (1,413,842) $ 2,006,433 $ 1,541,320 ================== =========== =========== Earnings (loss) per share $ (0.14) $ 0.20 $ 0.16 ================== =========== =========== Earnings (loss) per share- assuming dilution $ (0.13) $ 0.19 $ 0.15 ================== =========== =========== Weighted average common shares outstanding for: Basic EPS 10,063,581 9,976,071 9,875,606 Diluted EPS 10,761,669 10,449,306 10,182,803 INCOME STATEMENT DATA YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1999 1998 ----------- ----------- Net sales $27,164,399 $22,163,994 Cost of sales 14,907,768 12,428,324 14,844,376 ------------ ------------ ------------ ----------------------- ------------ Gross profit 19,344,327 14,947,716 12,256,631 9,735,670 10,554,740 Operating expenses 15,442,359 11,702,633 10,346,420 8,890,045 9,365,673 ------------ ------------ ------------ ----------------------- ------------ Operating income 3,901,968 3,245,084 1,910,211 845,625 1,189,067 Other expense 533,482 653,778 900,304 970,340 887,543 ------------ ------------ ------------ ----------------------- ------------ Income (loss) before income taxes 3,368,486 2,591,305 1,009,907 (124,715) 301,524 Income tax provision (benefit) 1,362,053 1,049,985 574,851 (85,524) 231,232----------- ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------Income (loss) before cumulative effect of change in accounting principle 435,056 (39,191) Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle - - ----------- ------------ Net income (loss) $ 2,006,433 $ 1,541,320 $ 435,056 $ (39,191) $ 70,292 ============ ============ ============ ======================= ============ Earnings (loss) per share 0.20 0.16$ 0.04 $ (0.00) 0.01 ============ ============ ============ ======================= ============ Earnings (loss) per share- assuming dilution 0.19 0.15$ 0.04 $ (0.00) 0.01 ============ ============ ============ ======================= ============ Weighted average common shares outstanding for: Basic EPS 9,976,071 9,875,606 9,853,161 9,803,887 9,789,358 ============ ============ ============ ============ ============ Diluted EPS 10,382,874 10,182,803 9,890,098 9,803,887 9,791,565 ============ ============ ============ ============ ============ Balance Sheet Data9,890,098 9,803,887
BALANCE SHEET DATA As of December 31, ------------------------------------------------------------------------- 2002 2001 2000 1999 1998 1997 ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ -------------------------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- Total assets $ 19,548,323 $ 19,686,079 $ 18,220,775 $ 16,029,937 $ 17,024,549 ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------19,675,602 $19,548,323 $19,686,079 $18,220,775 $16,029,937 -------------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- Notes payable and current Maturities of long term debt 4,218,968 4,527,904 5,759,626 6,061,735 6,139,327 4,650,742 ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ -------------------------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- Notes payable and long-term Debt, net of current maturities 2,256 7,691 13,025 121,686 61,389 2,602,728 ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ -------------------------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- Total Stockholders' Equity $ 12,423,671 $ 10,295,63711,170,062 $12,423,671 $10,295,637 $ 8,680,425 $ 8,170,278 $ 8,132,646 ============ ============ ============ ============ ========================== =========== =========== =========== ===========
1110 ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS - -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- OF OPERATIONS. - --------------- The Company is a leading provider of leather and leathercraft-related items and headwear trims. Its products are sold worldwide through Leather Factory stores, Tandy Leather stores, the Internet, and directly to headwear manufacturers (Cushman only). RESULTS OF OPERATIONS The following tables present selected financial data by category for each of the years ended December 31, 2002, 2001 and 2000:
ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS - -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- OF OPERATIONS. - -------------- The Company is a leading provider of leather and leathercraft-related items and headwear trims. Its products are sold worldwide through wholesale distribution channels and direct-to-consumer channels through the Leather Factory Units, Tandy Leather's retail stores, mail order and Internet, and directly to headwear manufacturers (Cushman only). As described above, the Company is organized into three related operating segments: Leather Factory, Tandy Leather, and Cushman. Results of Operations The following tables present selected financial data of each of the Company's three segments for the years ended December 31,2002 2001 2000 and 1999: 2001 2000 1999------------------------ ------------------------- ------------------------- ------------------------------------------------- OPERATING OPERATING OPERATING SALES INCOME SALES INCOME SALES INCOME ----------- ---------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ---------- Operating Operating Operating Sales Income Sales Income Sales Income ----- --------- ----- --------- ----- --------- Leather Factory $ 28,711,006 $ 3,719,157 $ 27,060,406 $ 2,991,804 $ 24,735,229 $ 1,924,631stores $30,313,478 $3,742,844 $28,711,006 $3,719,517 $27,060,406 $2,991,804 Tandy Leather*Leather stores * 7,387,874 371,372 6,606,090 281,998 575,635 (43,724) -- -- Cushman 2,027,263 17,558 1,962,166 (99,547) 2,459,223 297,004 2,429,170 (14,420) ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ ----------------------- ---------- ----------- ---------- ----------- ---------- Total Operations $ 37,279,262 $ 3,901,968 $ 30,095,264 $ 3,245,084 $ 27,164,399 $ 1,910,211 ============ ============ ============ ============ ============ ============
$39,728,615 $4,131,774 $37,279,262 $3,901,968 $30,095,264 $3,245,084 =========== ========== =========== ========== =========== ========== *The Tandy Leather assets were acquired in November 2000. Analysis
11 ANALYSIS OF 2002 COMPARED TO 2001 Consolidated net sales for 2002 increased $2.4 million, or 6.6%, compared to 2001. We had sales increases in all segments this year with Leather Factory stores contributing $1.6 million to the increase, Tandy stores adding $782,000 and Cushman adding $65,000. The Company experienced an increase in operating income of 5.9% from 2001 Compared to 2002, due primarily to a continued improvement in gross profit margins.
2002 2001 $CHANGE % CHANGE ----------- ----------- ---------- -------- Net sales $39,728,615 $37,279,262 $2,449,353 6.57% Cost of sales 18,393,914 17,934,935 458,979 2.56% ----------- ----------- ---------- -------- Gross profit 21,334,701 19,344,327 1,990,374 10.29% Operating expenses 17,202,927 15,442,359 1,760,568 11.40% ----------- ----------- ---------- -------- Operating income 4,131,774 3,901,968 229,806 5.89% Other expense 311,917 533,482 (221,565) (41.53%) ----------- ----------- ---------- -------- Income before income taxes 3,819,857 3,368,486 451,371 13.40% Income tax provision 1,224,868 1,362,053 (137,185) (10.07)% ----------- ----------- ---------- -------- Income before change in accounting principle $2,594,989 $2,006,433 $588,556 29.33% Cumulative effect of chg in accounting principle (4,008,831) - (4,008,831) N/A ----------- ----------- ---------- -------- Net income (loss) $(1,413,842) $2,006,433 $(3,420,275) N/A =========== ========== =========== --------
12 LEATHER FACTORY STORES Net sales for Leather Factory, which is comprised of 30 stores as of December 2002, increased 5.6% as follows:
2002 2001 $INCR (DECR) % INCR (DECR) ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------- Same store sales (27 stores) $29,372,715 $28,014,932 $1,357,783 4.85% % of total 96.90% 97.58% 84.73% New store sales (3 stores) 809,752 193,674 616,078 318.10% % of total 2.67% 0.67% 38.45% "Transferred to Tandy" store sales (1 store) 131,011 502,400 (371,389) (73.92)% % of total 0.43% 1.75% (23.18)% ----------- ----------- ---------- ------- Total sales $30,313,478 $28,711,006 $1,602,472 5.58% =========== =========== ========== ======= 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% ----------- ----------- ----------
We determine our sales mix based on internally-defined customer groups as follows:
CUSTOMER GROUP GROUP CHARACTERISTICS - -------------- --------------------- Retail End users, consumers, individuals Institution Prisons, prisoners, hospitals, schools, YMCA, Boy Scouts, etc. Wholesale Saddle & tack stores, resellers and distributors, dealers, etc. Craft Craft stores (individually owned) and craft store chains Midas Small manufacturers ASC Authorized Sales Centers
As the following table indicates, there was slight variation in our sales mix from 2001 to 2002. However, the majority of the sales growth in dollars was the result of increased sales in our Retail and Craft customer groups. Our Retail sales, while holding steady at approximately 20% of our total 2002 sales, increased in dollars by 19% over last year's retail sales and our Craft sales increased 15% in dollars. We experienced sales gains in most markets, the exception being minimal declines in our Wholesale and Institution groups (2% and 1% declines, respectively).
QTD 3/31/02 QTR 6/30/02 QTD 9/30/02 QTD 12/31/02 YTD 12/31/02 ----------- ----------- ----------- ------------ ------------ CUSTOMER GROUP - -------------- Retail 21% 18% 17% 27% 21% Institution 7% 8% 7% 7% 7% Wholesale 32% 34% 34% 29% 32% Craft 26% 25% 28% 20% 25% Midas 7% 8% 8% 9% 8% ASC 7% 7% 6% 8% 7% ---------- ------------ ----------- ------------ ----------- 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% ========== ============ =========== ============ ============
QTD 3/31/01 QTD 6/30/01 QTD 9/30/01 QTD 12/31/01 YTD 12/31/01 ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------- ------------- CUSTOMER GROUP - -------------- Retail 21% 16% 19% 21% 19% Institution 8% 10% 6% 6% 8% Wholesale 32% 34% 34% 38% 34% Craft 21% 28% 26% 20% 24% Midas 11% 5% 10% 7% 8% ASC 7% 7% 5% 8% 7% ---------- ------------ ------------ ------------- ------------- 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% ========== ============ ============ ============= =============
Operating income for the Leather Factory stores increased $23,000 or 0.63%. Operating expenses were up 10.04% from 2001 - with increases in personnel costs (wages and health insurance) and advertising contributing the majority of the increase. Manager bonuses were up in 2002 as well due to the increased operating profits of the stores over 2001. Gross margin as a percentage of sales improved from 52.50% for 2001 to 53.56% for 2002. We believe, generally speaking, that the Leather Factory's gross margin has little room for additional improvement due to the mix of customers it serves. We continue to negotiate with vendors for lower pricing of product that we purchase and we believe we were successful in that endeavor in most of our product categories. We will continue to look for opportunities in our purchasing efforts as those opportunities present themselves; however, we also believe that we have maximized those efforts as much as can reasonably be expected at the present time. Future fluctuations in gross margins will occur primarily as a result of the mix of the product categories sold and the correlating margins associated with those categories. Our product line is made up of approximately 2,600 items. We have further expanded our merchandise categories from those discussed in our 2001 Annual Report as follows:
MERCHANDISE CATEGORY 2002 GP % 2001 GP % - ---------------------------------------------------- --------- --------- Belt Strips and Straps 59.93% 56.26% Books, Patterns and Videos 60.99% 58.39% Buckles 62.13% 58.33% Conchos 68.43% 65.94% Craft Supplies 60.54% 57.54% Custom Tools and Hardware 56.89% 52.08% Dyes, Finishes, Glues and Supplies 53.52% 52.41% Hand Tools 55.89% 54.78% Hardware 58.33% 57.59% Kits 51.47% 46.44% Laces 47.06% 40.85% Leather 41.54% 37.73% Shoe Supplies 49.80% 45.97% Stamping Tools 60.76% 57.66% -------- -------- Leather Factory store gross profit margin (overall) 53.56% 52.50% ======== ========
13 TANDY LEATHER STORES Tandy Leather was operated strictly as an order fulfillment house for orders generated via phone, fax, mail order, and Internet in 2001. In 2002, we began the development of the retail store chain while temporarily operating the order fulfillment house. This unit was eliminated as of September 1, 2002. The fourteen retail stores opened in 2002 were as follows:
LOCATION SQ FOOTAGE MONTH OPENED - ------------------ ---------- ------------ Oklahoma City, OK (1) 3,160 January Boise, ID (1) 1,800 March Sacramento, CA 1,600 June E Hartford, CT 1,200 April Salt Lake City, UT 1,750 June Fort Worth, TX 3,000 May Austin, TX (2) 3,800 June Dallas, TX 1,700 August Albuquerque, NM 1,764 August Las Vegas, NV 1,350 August Indianapolis, IN 1,500 October Peoria, IL 1,350 October Memphis, TN (1) 2,500 October Tempe, AZ (1) 1,986 November (1) Purchased existing leathercraft store (2) Formerly a Leather Factory store
Net sales for Tandy Leather, which was comprised of 14 retail stores as of December 2002, increased 11.8% as follows:
2002 2001 $ INCR(DECR) % INCR(DECR) ----------- ----------- ------------ ------------ Order fulfillment house (closed 9/1/02) $3,605,087 $6,606,090 $(3,001,003) (45.43)% % of total 48.80% 100.00% (383.87)% New store sales (13 stores) 3,249,214 - 3,249,214 *** % of total 43.98% 0.00% 415.62% Former "Leather Factory" store sales (1 store) 533,573 - 533,573 *** % of total 7.22% 0.00% 68.25% ------------ ----------- ------------ Total sales $7,387,874 $6,606,090 $ 781,784 11.83% ============ =========== ============ 100.00% 100.00% 100.00%
We intend to continue the expansion of Tandy's retail store chain in 2003 by opening a total of 10-12 new stores throughout the year as long as the domestic retail leathercraft market can support the additional stores. Through the end of March, we have opened five stores in 2003: the Baltimore, MD store opened in January, the Tulsa, OK store opened in February, and stores in Pittsburgh, PA, Orange County, CA, and Atlanta, GA opened in March. We remain committed to a conservative growth plan that minimizes risks to the Company's profits and financial stability. We moved Tandy to a new point-of-sale software in April 2002 which allows us to track its sales mix in a similar fashion as that of the Leather Factory.
CUSTOMER GROUPS 2002 2001 - --------------- ---- ---- Retail 65% 53% ASC 8% 18% Wholesale 15% 14% Institution 12% 15% Craft * N/A Midas * N/A ---- ---- 100% 100% ==== ==== * less than 1%
On a quarterly basis in 2002, Tandy's sales mix was as follows:
CUSTOMER GROUPS Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 - --------------- ---- ---- ---- ---- Retail 61% 57% 62% 65% ASC 15% 9% 7% 8% Wholesale 11% 16% 18% 15% Institution 12% 17% 12% 11% Craft 1% 0% * * Midas 0% 1% * * ---- ---- ---- ---- Total 100% 100% 100% 100% ==== ==== ==== ==== * less than 1%
As indicated by the percentages in the table above, Tandy's sales mix is following that of historical performance in that sales to summer camps (in our Institution customer category) is especially high in the second quarter of the year and retail sales typically rise in the fourth quarter due to the holiday shopping season. Due to the elimination of the order fulfillment house ("OFH") during the year and the introduction of the fourteen retail stores, we present the financial performance of the two operational structures separately:
OFH % STORES % TOTAL % ---------- ------- ---------- ------- ---------- ------- Net sales $3,605,087 100.00% $3,782,787 100.00% $7,387,874 100.00% Cost of sales 1,519,404 42.15% 1,473,086 38.94% 2,992,490 40.51% ---------- ---------- ---------- Gross profit 2,085,683 57.85% 2,309,701 61.06% 4,395,384 59.49% Operating expenses 2,021,976 56.09% 2,002,036 52.92% 4,024,012 54.47% ---------- ---------- ---------- Operating income $ 63,707 1.77% $ 307,665 8.14% $ 371,372 5.02% ---------- ---------- ----------
While we believe that the stores are able to improve their operating efficiency and will continue to work toward that end, we also believe that the table above proves our theory that the retail stores can operate much more efficiently than a centralized order fulfillment house. The largest expenses for the stores, as a percentage of sales, are salaries and wages, advertising, and shipping. While it is unrealistic to expect an elimination of shipping expenses (shipping product to customers) by the stores, we do expect this expense to decrease as more stores are open and our over-the-counter sales increase. 14 CUSHMAN Cushman's sales were up modestly in 2002 (3.3%) while gross profit margins increased from 28.6% to 34.6%, an improvement of 21%. We still believe Cushman is continuing to gain market share in the industry and that belief was further strengthened in 2002 as one of our main competitors went out of business in late 2002. Operating income increased from a $99,000 loss in 2001 to income of $17,000 for 2002. The elimination of goodwill amortization accounted for the improvement. Overall, we are pleased with Cushman's performance in 2002 and believe we will see continued improvement in 2003. See "Financial Condition" section below for detailed discussion regarding the effect of the change in accounting principle and the resulting write-down of Cushman's goodwill in 2002. OTHER EXPENSE AND PROVISION FOR INCOME TAXES Other expenses decreased approximately 42%. The decrease is attributable to the interest paid on our outstanding debt. While there was only a slight drop in the interest rate during 2002 compared to 2001, the average outstanding debt balance dropped significantly. Our average outstanding debt balance in 2002 was $3,600,000 while the 2001 average outstanding debt balance was $4,900,000. The provision for federal and state income taxes was 32% of 2002 income before taxes compared to 40% in 2001. The reduction results from the conversion of the operating entities from corporations to more tax-favored entities (limited partnership) in certain states in which we operate and the elimination of goodwill amortization for book purposes in 2002. 15 ANALYSIS OF 2001 COMPARED TO 2000 Consolidated net sales for 2001 increased $7.2 million, or 23.9%, compared to 2000. Tandy contributed $6.0 million to the increase as 2001 included a full year of Tandy's operations, while 2000 only included December operations. Leather Factory added an additional $1.7 million in sales in 2001, partially offset by a sales decline at Cushman of $500,000. The Company experienced an increase in operating income of 20.2% from 2000 to 2001, due primarily to an overall improvement in gross profit margins. 2001 2000 $ Change % Change ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- Net sales $37,279,262 $30,095,264 $ 7,183,998 23.87% Cost of sales 17,934,935 15,147,547 2,787,388 18.40% ----------- ----------- ----------- Gross profit 19,344,327 14,947,716 4,396,610 29.41% Operating expenses 15,442,359 11,702,633 3,739,727 31.96% ----------- ----------- ----------- Operating income 3,901,968 3,245,084 656,883 20.24% Other (income) expense 533,482 653,778 (120,296) (18.40%) ----------- ----------- ----------- Income before income taxes 3,368,486 2,591,305 777,180 29.99% Income tax provision 1,362,053 1,049,986 312,068 29.72% ----------- ----------- ----------- Net income $ 2,006,433 $ 1,541,320 $ 465,111
2001 2000 $ CHANGE % CHANGE ----------- ----------- ----------- --------- Net sales $37,279,262 $30,095,264 $7,183,998 23.87% Cost of sales 17,934,935 15,147,547 2,787,388 18.40% ---------- ----------- ----------- Gross profit 19,344,327 14,947,717 4,396,610 29.41% Operating expenses 15,442,359 11,702,633 3,739,726 31.96% ---------- ----------- ----------- Operating income 3,901,968 3,245,084 656,884 20.24% Other expense 533,482 653,778 (120,296 (18.40%) ---------- ----------- ----------- Income before income taxes 3,368,486 2,591,306 777,180 29.99% Income tax provision 1,362,053 1,049,986 312,067 29.72% ---------- ----------- ----------- Net income $2,006,433 $1,541,320 $ 465,113 30.18% =========== ========== =========== =========== =========== 12
16 Leather Factory OperationsLEATHER FACTORY STORES Net sales for Leather Factory, which is comprised of 30 sales/distribution Unitsstores as of December 2001, increased 6.1%. The four new Unitsstores opened in late 2000 and 2001 contributed a significant portion (77.8%) of the sales increase; while same Unitstore sales increased 22.2% from 2000 to 2001. We monitor sales via several different categories - one being customer groups. Our customer groups are generally defined as follows: Customer Group Group Characteristics -------------- --------------------- Retail End users, consumers, individuals Institution Prisons, prisoners, hospitals, schools, YMCA, Boy Scouts, etc. Wholesale Saddle & tack stores, resellers and distributors, shoe-findings and repair shops, dealers, etc. Craft Craft stores (individually owned) and craft store chains Midas Small manufacturers ASC Authorized Sales Centers Export Foreign customers (outsidecontributed the United States)remainder. The majority of the overall sales increase was to our Craft customers. Our Retail sales, while holding steady at 20% of our total sales, increased in dollars by 8% over last year's retail sales. We experienced sales declines in our Institution and Midas markets, but compensated by gains in the Wholesale ASC, and ExportASC groups. Operating income for the Leather Factory line increased by $728,000 and improved the operating margin to net sales from 11.1% in 2000 to 12.9% in 2001. The increase in operating income results from improved gross profit margins as well as a slight improvement in operating efficiency. Operating expenses decreased slightly (0.42%) as a percentage of sales. Management's target for Leather Factory's operating expenses as a percentage of sales is 40% or less and that target was met for 2001. Gross margin as a percentage of sales improved by 1.75 basis points primarily as a result of the changes we made in sourcing product --- purchasing from different vendors at a lower price. Our product mix is made up of approximately 2,800 items that can be grouped into categories as follows: >> Liquids >> Hardware >> Thread >> Tools >> Leather >> Books & Videos >> Buckles >> Accents >> Kits Leather represents approximately 40% of our inventory (in dollars) at any given time and also represents approximately 40% of our sales. However, we earn the smallest amount of gross profit margin on the leather we sell --- for 2001 and 2000, gross profit margin on leather sold was approximately 38%. The improvement in our margins comes from the items sold fromin the other categories. These other categories earned gross profit margins ranging from 49.4% to 64.0% in 2001, and 49.8% to 56.9% in 2000. The fluctuation in gross margins occurs primarily as a result of the mix of product categories sold and the correlating profit margins of those categories. Tandy Leather Operations17 TANDY LEATHER ORDER FULFILLMENT Tandy Leather was acquired by the Company in November 2000; therefore our results for 2000 only included one month's operation for Tandy Leather. In 2001, Tandy operated strictly as an order fulfillment house for orders generated via phone, fax, mail order, and Internet. Our 2001 sales target was $7.0 13 million, based on Tandy's annual sales prior to acquisition. Tandy missed that target by $394,000. However, we discovered early in the year that some of Tandy's sales were at very low profit margins and, in a few cases, were below cost. We quickly adjusted selling prices to eliminate these low-margin sales problems and as a result, gave uplost some sales from customers who were not willing to pay the new prices. As a result,Therefore, even though Tandy's 2001 sales were slightly below expectation, we improved gross profit margins by over 12 percentage points. Currently, Tandy tracks its sales by customer groups - Retail (individual hobbyists primarily), Dealers (which is comparable to Leather Factory's Authorized Sales Centers), Institution (prisons, prisoners, and hospitals), Youth (schools, camps, etc.), and Wholesale (resellers and manufacturers). While we do not have enough financial history to compare categorical sales in 2001 to prior years, our 2001 sales were made up of the following mix: Retail 53%; Dealers 18%, Wholesale 14%, Institution 8%, Youth 7%. Operating expenses as a percentage of sales were held virtually constant from 2000 to 2001 at 51.8%. While Tandy's cost of operations is expected to be higher than that of Leather Factory due to the higher costs associated with targeting the retail market as compared to the wholesale market, we still believe that Tandy can operate more efficiently and will continue to work toward that end. In the first quarter of 2002, Tandy opened 2 retail stores via the acquisition of existing leathercraft stores in Oklahoma and Idaho. Management has announced its plans to continue the expansion of Tandy's retail store chain throughout 2002 and beyond, as new store or acquisition opportunities arise and the domestic retail leathercraft market can support new stores. We are committed to a conservative growth plan in that the Company's profits and financial stability are not going to be sacrificed for the sake of quick growth. CushmanCUSHMAN Cushman's sales were down 20% in 2001, even though we believe that we continue to gain market share from our competitors because of our commitment to timely delivery of quality product. The primary reason for this decrease is not caused by a reduction in number of trims produced, but in the type of trims produced. The popularity of the straw hat, which is a more casual hat versus the felt hat, is increasing every year due in part to price paid by the consumer (strawstraw hats arebeing less expensive than felt)felt and in part to the fashion trends. Historically, straw hats were worn in the spring and summer seasons while felt hats were the hat of choice in the fall and winter. Now it is acceptable to wear straw hats year round. The global warming theory may also contribute to this shift in the headwear trend as straw hats are cooler to wear than felt hats. As a result, the trims being requested by the manufacturers are made from materials other than leather. Leather trims are the most expensive, but generally are not put on straw hats. Therefore, even though we produced as many trims in 2001 as we did in 2000, the selling price of these non-leather trims is much lower than that of the leather trims. Operating income decreased significantly due primarily to a drop in gross profit margin. In 2001, we sold some trims at substantially-reduced prices for two reasons: (1) the market conditions and trends in the headwear industry in general, and (2) to clear out some of our inventory that does not fit with the fashion trends developing. We reduced our personnel costs late in 2001 to help offset the low gross profit margins. AssumingOTHER EXPENSE AND PROVISION FOR INCOME TAXES Other expenses decreased approximately 18%. The decrease is attributable to the headwear industry in general and the hat and trim preferences in particular continue their current trends, we believe we are in a position internally to achieve better resultsreduction in the future. 14
Analysis of 2000 Compared to 1999 Consolidated net sales for 2000 increased $2.9 million, or 10.8%, compared to 1999. Leather Factory contributed $2.3 million to the increase; sales by Tandy Leather contributed $575,000 in December 2000, and Cushman's sales held steady for the year. The Company experienced an increase in operating income of 69.9% from 1999 to 2000 due primarily to the sales increase and an improvement in gross profit margins. 2000 1999 $ Change % Change ----------- ----------- ---------- ---------- Net sales $30,095,264 $27,164,399 $2,930,864 10.79% Cost of sales 15,147,547 14,907,768 239,779 1.61% ----------- ----------- ---------- Gross profit 14,947,716 12,256,631 2,691,085 21.96% Operating expenses 11,702,633 10,346,420 1,356,213 13.11% ----------- ----------- ---------- Operating income 3,245,084 1,910,211 1,334,872 69.88% Other (income) expense 653,778 900,304 (246,525) (27.38%) ----------- ----------- ---------- Income before income taxes 2,591,305 1,009,907 1,581,399 156.59% Income tax provision 1,049,986 574,851 475,134 82.65% ----------- ----------- ---------- Net income $ 1,541,320 $ 435,056 $1,106,263 254.28% =========== =========== ==========
Leather Factory Operations Net sales for Leather Factory, which is comprised of 28 sales/distribution units as of December 31, 2000, increased 9.4% over 1999. The four units opened mid-1999 and two units opened lateinterest rates during 2001 compared to 2000. Our average interest rate in 2000 contributed 46.1%was 9.7% while the average interest rate in 2001 was 7.4%. In addition, there was a slight decrease in our average outstanding debt balance from $5.1 million in 2000 to $4.9 million in 2001. The provision for federal and state income taxes was 40% of 2001 pre-tax income - the growth, while same store sales increased 39.7% from 1999 to 2000. We also transferred our small finished leather goods division from Cushman to Leather Factory in the spring of 1999 and that division's sales were 14.2% of the Leather Factory sales increaseas in 2000. The primary sales growth was generated from the retail customer market (individual hobbyists). Retail sales in 2000 increased 35% from 1999. In years past, we focused our marketing efforts primarily toward the wholesale customer. Beginning in 1999, we began to specifically target retail customersdollar increase in our direct mail advertising program as well as in our sales/distribution units. As a result, we have experienced significant growth in this market. Our ASC program generated sales of approximately $1.7 million in 2000, with 145 approved ASC's in the program as of December 31, 2000. This compares to 80 approved ASCs as of December 31, 1999 contributing sales of approximately $900,000 in 1999. Our export sales decreased slightly in 2000 as well as specific wholesale categories (shoe care/repair primarily), but were offset by increases in sales in our other core markets (saddle and tack, small manufacturers, etc). Operating income from Leather Factory operations increased by $1.1 million and improved the operating margin to net sales from 6.8% in 1999 to 10.4% in 2000. The increase in operating incometax expense results from improved gross profit margins. Gross margin as a percentage of sales improved by 4.5 points. This large improvement was the result of the increase in retail sales as retail sales historically produce higher profit margins than that of wholesale sales. Operating expenses increased by $1.15 million or 11.8% of sales. This is due to increases in payroll costs (increased number of employees due to the new sales/distribution units opened in 2000, and increase in managers' bonuses based on profits earned at the units) and advertising costs (increased efforts toward retail customers via direct mailing pieces.) 15income. 18 Tandy Leather Operations Tandy Leather was acquired in November 2000 and therefore was included in the Company's consolidated financial statements for December 2000 only. Tandy's sales were $575,000, gross profit was 43.8%, and operating expenses were 51.4% as a percentage of sales. Tandy had an operating loss of $44,000 for the month. Cushman Sales of hat trims increased 4% from 1999 to 2000 even though total 2000 sales were even with sales in 1999 at $2.4 million. (Approximately $70,000 in sales of various finished leather goods are included in the 1999 sales totals. These products have subsequently been transferred to a division of Leather Factory.) In addition to our quality hatbands sold in 2000, we have captured a significant portion of the buckle market for headwear adornments. Operating income increased $243,000 and improved the operating margin by almost 10% over 1999. The increase in operating income was the result of improved gross profit margins and a reduction in uncollectible accounts written off. In 1999, one of Cushman's customers went out of business rather unexpectedly and as a result, Cushman recorded an unusually large bad debt write-off. A small portion of the amount written off was recovered in 2000 and had no other unusual write-offs of accounts during 2000. Cushman's gross profit margins increased approximately 6% due to the introduction of non-manufactured trims into its product -- specifically, Cushman began selling finished (i.e. requires no manufacturing on its part) feathers, buckles, etc. to headwear manufacturers. Cushman earns higher margins on this type of product. Financial Condition At December 31, 2000, the Company had inventory of $9.2 million and net property and equipment of $1.2 million. Goodwill and other intangibles (net of amortization and depreciation) were $4.8 million and $615,000, with the Tandy Leather asset acquisition resulting in the addition of $250,000 in artwork. Net total assets were $19.7 million. Current liabilities were $9.3 million (including current maturities of long-term indebtedness), while long-term liabilities were $13,000. Total stockholders' equity at the end of 2000 had increased to $10.3 million, principally as a result of the $1.5 million of net income recorded by the Company during 2000. During 2001, net cash provided from operating activities was $2.0 million. The Company applied $1.2 million to reduce the outstanding balance on its credit facility described below, leaving an outstanding principal balance of $4.5 million as of December 31, 2001.FINANCIAL CONDITION At December 31, 2001, the Companywe had inventory of $9.0 million and net property and equipment of $1.3 million. Goodwill and other intangibles (net of amortization and depreciation) were $4.5 million and $529,000,$477,000, respectively. The Company also holds $250,000 in a leather artwork collection, most of which was created by Al Stohlman, a legendary leathercrafter. Net total assets were $19.5 million. Current liabilities were $7.1 million (including $4.5 million of current maturities of long-term debt), while long-term liabilities weredebt was $8,000. Total stockholders' equity at the end of 2001 had increased to $12.4 million, principally as a result of the $2.0 million of net income recorded byduring 2001. During 2001, net cash provided from operating activities was $2.0 million. We applied $1.2 million to reduce the Company duringoutstanding balance on our credit facility described below, leaving an outstanding principal balance of $4.5 million as of December 31, 2001. As a result of various acquisitions made during the Company'sour history, the Company haswe had recorded goodwill on itsour consolidated balance sheet and hashad amortized this goodwill through the end of 2001. In June 2001, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued a new accounting rule regarding the amortization of goodwill (SFAS No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets). As a result of that pronouncement, effective January 1, 2002, the amortization of goodwill (and other intangible assets with indefinite lives) will ceaseceased and goodwill will bewas subject to an impairment test based on its fair value. 16 The majority of the goodwill ($4.5 million) as presented on our consolidated balance sheet at December 31, 2001 is Cushman's.belonged to Cushman. Given that the Cushman's goodwill makes up the majority (80%) of its separate balance sheet assets and the current trends of the industry in which Cushman operates management has reasonand Cushman's financial results over the last several years, we felt it necessary to believe that, while projected cash flows have more than substantiated the balance in prior years, it is likely that we will incur an impairment write-down of the goodwill balance based on a fair value assessment. We are unable to determine an amount at this time. The Company has engagedengage a business valuation firm to determine Cushman's fair value and anticipates determiningvalue. Based on that assessment, we incurred an impairment write-down of all of the write-down amount, if any, prior to the filing ofCushman goodwill in the first quarter of 2002 Form 10-Q. Capital Resourcesin the amount of $4.0 million. The write-down was only partially offset by the Company's 2002 income before giving effect to this accounting change. Retained earnings and Liquiditytotal stockholders' equity at the end of 2002 were $7.1 million and $11.2 million, down from $8.5 million and $12.4 million at the end of 2001. The Company does not anticipate any other similar write-downs at this time. At December 31, 2002, we owned $12.7 million of inventory and $2.0 million of property and equipment. Goodwill and other intangibles (net of amortization and depreciation) were $686,000 and $483,000, respectively and we still hold $250,000 in a leather artwork collection. Net total assets were $19.7 million. Current liabilities were $8.3 million (including $4.2 million of current maturities of long-term debt), while long-term debt was $2,000. Total stockholders' equity at the end of 2002 had decreased to $11.2 million, principally as a result of the $1.4 million net loss recorded during 2002. 19 CAPITAL RESOURCES AND LIQUIDITY On November 19, 1999,March 20, 2002, the Company entered into a Credit and Security Agreement with Wells Fargo Bank Minnesota, N.A. ("Wells Fargo"), which replaced the borrowing arrangement with Wells Fargo Business Credit, Inc. ("WFBC"), in which WFBC agreed to provide a credit facility of up to $8,650,000 (the "Credit Facility"). The Credit Facility has a three-year termfacility matures in November 2004 and is secured by all of the assets of the Company. The initial borrowings from WFBC were used to refinance the Company's funded indebtedness outstanding at that time. On November 30, 2000, the Company entered into the First Amendment to the Credit and Security Agreement ("Amendment 1") with WFBC. There, WFBC consented to the Tandy Leather transaction and amended certain financial tests to reflect the acquisition of the Tandy Leather assets, to make previously contemplated extensions of these tests, and to raise the standards required in those tests based on the Company's improved financial performance since the credit agreement was originally signed. On February 7, 2001, the Company entered into the Second Amendment to the Credit and Security Agreement ("Amendment 2") with WFBC. There, WFBC granted a special accommodation advance of a maximum of $300,000 to be used by the Company as needed through July 2001. At the time of Amendment 2, the Company was anticipating significant cash requirements for payment of income taxes and the annual ESOP contribution and manager bonuses. However, the Company was able to generate adequate cash flow from its operations to meet these annual cash payments and the special accommodation advance was not needed or drawn. On June 14, 2001, the Company entered into the Third Amendment to the Credit and Security Agreement ("Amendment 3") with WFBC. There, WFBC reduced the interest rate on the revolving credit facility from prime + 1/2% to prime (4.75% at December 31, 2001). In addition, the capital expenditure limit was increased from $500,000 to $650,000 for 2001 to permit additional expenditures incurred following the acquisition of Tandy Leather. Amendment 3 also waived all defaults that occurred because our capital expenditures exceeded $500,000 before the amendment was put into place. The Company is currently in compliance with all covenants and conditions contained in the Credit Facility and has no reason to believe that it will not continue to operate in compliance with the provisions of these financing arrangements. The principal terms and conditions of the Credit Facility are described in further detail in Note 54 Notes Payable and Long-Term Debt to the Consolidated Financial Statements. The Company borrows and repays funds under revolving credit terms as needed. Principal balances at the end of each quarter are shown below: 4th Qtr. `00 1st Qtr. `01 2nd Qtr. `01 3rd Qtr. `01 4th Qtr. `01 ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ $ 5,650,965 $ 5,015,611 $ 4,462,957 $ 4,928,151 $ 4,500,422 17
4TH QTR. '01 1ST QTR. '02 2ND QTR. '02 3RD QTR. '02 4TH QTR. '02 - ------------- ------------- ------------- ------------- ------------- (WFBC) (WELLS FARGO) (WELLS FARGO) (WELLS FARGO) (WELLS FARGO) $4,500,422 $2,978,645 $3,323,269 $3,899,379 $4,213,533
Total indebtedness with WFBC (revolving credit line) at the end of 2000 and 2001 and with Wells Fargo at the end of 2002 are shown below: December
DECEMBER 31, -------------------------------------------------------------------------- 2000 2001 ----------------------------------- ----------------------------------- Principal Accrued Interest Principal Accrued Interest ---------------- ---------------- ---------------- ----------------2002 ----------------------------- ----------------------------- WFBC WELLS FARGO ----------------------------- ----------------------------- PRINCIPAL ACCRUED INTEREST PRINCIPAL ACCRUED INTEREST ----------- ----------------- ----------- ----------------- Revolving Line $ 5,650,965 $ 50,951 $ 4,500,422 $ 19,657 ================ ================ ================$ 4,213,533 $ 15,706 =========== ================= =========== ================
The primary source of liquidity and capital resources during 20012002 was cash flow provided by operating activities.activities and our Credit and Security Agreement with Wells Fargo. Cash flows from operations for 20012002 were $2.0$1.4 million. The largest portion of the operating cash flow was generated from net income.income before the goodwill write-off. Consolidated accounts receivable remained virtually unchangeddecreased to $1.9 million at December 31, 2002 compared to $2.3 million at December 31, 2001 compared to $2.2 million at December 31, 2000.2001. Average days to collect accounts improved considerably from 57.30 days in 2000 to 47.86 days in 2001 to 43.54 days in 2002 on a consolidated basis. Individually, Leather Factory andFactory's days to collect was 41.52 days for 2002, an improvement over 2001 of 2.01 days. Tandy's days to collect was 34.09 days for 2002, an improvement of 17.59 days from 2001. Cushman's days to collect accounts improved by 4.43 and 5.52was 63.26 for 2002, an improvement of 11.87 days respectively.from 2001. Tandy's days to collect accounts was 51.68 days for 2001. Management expects Tandy'ssignificant improvement in average days to collect in 2002 to improve as we continue to collectis the result of the significant collection of delinquent accounts obtained in the Tandy Leather acquisition. Inventory decreasedincreased to $9.0$12.7 million at December 31, 20012002 from $9.2$9.0 million at December 31, 2000.the end of 2001. This increase was principally attributable to (1) our efforts to boost inventory in anticipation of the dock strike on the West Coast of the United States that has since ended, (2) the surge in flow of goods to us after the strike ended and the backlog of shipments unloaded, and (3) the addition of the fourteen new Tandy Leather stores in 2002. We have reduced our inventory purchases considerably in the first quarter of 2003 in order to return inventory to customary levels, although we anticipate it will be into the 2nd quarter of 2003 before the inventory begins to level out. Consolidated inventory turned 4.083.65 times during 2002, a slight slowdown from 2001 which is an improvement over(4.08 times) and essentially the same as 2000 (3.64 times). Separately, Tandy Leather's 2002 and 1999 (3.45 times). The 2000 rate did not include the impact of Tandy Leather due to the timing of that transaction. Separately, Tandy's2001 inventory turnedturns were 8.10 times and 4.79 times, in 2001,respectively. Leather Factory's inventory turned 3.20 times in 2002 and 3.96 times in 2001, and 3.56 times in 2000, and Cushman's inventory turned 4.12 times and 3.86 times in 2002 and 2001, respectively. The significant improvement in the inventory turn rate for Tandy Leather is due to the elimination of its central warehouse in September 2002 (combined into Leather Factory's warehouse). We now record only merchandise held in Tandy Leather stores as Tandy Leather inventory. Leather Factory's turns slowed slightly in 2002 because it added the Tandy Leather warehouse inventory to the goods held for the Leather Factory store system. Additionally, the increase in inventory arriving at the central warehouse in the fourth quarter adversely affected Leather Factory's inventory turns. Leather Factory store inventory turns, excluding the central warehouse inventory, were approximately 7.0 and 4.79 times6.5 turns in 2000.2002 and 2001, respectively. We compute our inventory turnover rates as sales divided by average inventory. Accounts payable decreasedincreased to $1.3$1.6 million at December 31, 20012002 from $2.2$1.3 million at the end of 2000.2001. The trade payables assumed in connection with the Tandy Leather acquisitionincreased inventory on hand at the end of 2000, which caused2002 accounted for the December 31, 2000 accounts payable balance to be higher than normal by approximately $400,000, have been paid entirely. In addition, Leather Factory and Cushman's outstanding payables decreased from 2000 to 2001 by an additional $500,000 as a result of stronger cash flow generated from operations.increase. The Company's current ratio improved at December 31, 20012002 to 1.82,1.94, compared to 1.381.82 at December 31, 2000.2001. If, however, accounting rules had not required the Company's debt with Wells Fargo to be classified as short-term (even though the stated maturity is in November 2004), the current ratio at December 31, 2002 would have been 3.94. The largest use of operating cash in 20012002 was for debt reduction and various capital expenditures. Capital expenditures totaled $630,000$1,073,000 and $378,000$630,000 for the years ended December 31, 20012002 and 2000,2001, respectively. Capital expenditures in 20012002 included $225,000 incurred following the Tandy Leather acquisition forapproximately $600,000 in leasehold improvements for the central warehouse and additional equipment needed for operations. Offactory consolidation and remodeling of the remaining 2001 capital spending, approximately 75% was for computer equipmentFort Worth Leather Factory store. The following table summarizes by years our contractual obligations and software, including a rather large data warehouse implementation project, and 25% was for office furniture and equipment, and warehouse fixtures and machinery. 18 commercial commitments as of December 31, 2002:
The following table summarizes by years our contractual obligations and commercial commitments as of December 31, 2001: Payments Due by Periods -------------------------------------------------------------------- Contractual Less 1-3 4-5 AfterPAYMENTS DUE BY PERIODS ------------------------------------------------------------------ LESS THAN 1 - 3 CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS TOTAL 1 YEAR YEARS 4 -5 YEARS AFTER 5 Obligations Total Than 1 Year Years Years YearsYEARS - ----------------------------- -------------- --------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- --------------------- ------------- Long-Term DebtLONG-TERM DEBT* $ 4,500,4224,213,533 - $4,213,533 - - CAPITAL LEASE OBLIGATIONS 8,002 $ 4,500,422* -- -- -- Capital Lease Obligations 36,566 28,5646,859 1,143 - - OPERATING LEASES 5,744,905 1,594,438 3,349,950 $ 8,002 -- -- Operating Leases 3,471,864 1,360,546 1,869,380800,517 - -------------- ---------- ---------- --------- ------------- TOTAL CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS $ 241,938 -- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- Total Contractual Cash Obligations9,966,440 $1,601,297 $7,564,626 $ 8,008,852800,517 $ 5,889,532 $ 1,877,382 $ 241,938 $ -- =========== =========== =========== =========== ===========- ============== ========== ========== ========= ============= _____________ * The Company's loan from Wells Fargo matures in November 2004. The loan's maturity can be accelerated in the event of a material adverse change or upon other occurrences described in the related credit agreement.
*The existing credit facility20 CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES The analysis and discussion of our financial condition and results of operations is based upon our consolidated financial statements that have been prepared in accordance with WFBC matures in November 2002. On March 20, 2002, the Company entered into a Credit and Security Agreement with Wells Fargo Bank Minnesota, N.A. ("Wells Fargo"), which replaced the borrowing arrangement with WFBC. See Note 5 Notes Payable and Long-Term Debt to the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional details. Critical Accounting Policies Generallygenerally accepted accounting principles requirein the useUnited States (US GAAP). The preparation of management's judgmentsfinancial statements in accordance with US GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses, and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. US GAAP provides the framework from which to make these estimates, in addition to the rulesassumptions and requirements imposed by the accounting pronouncements. More detailed information about thedisclosures. We choose accounting policies within US GAAP that we use is containedbelieve are appropriate to accurately and fairly report the Company's operating results and financial position in a consistent manner. Management regularly assesses these policies in light of current and forecasted economic conditions. The Company's accounting policies are stated in Note 2 Summary of Significant Accounting Policies, to our Consolidated Financial Statements include in this Form 10-K. Other accounting policies not discussed here are described there, and readers should review that information carefully.the consolidated financial statements. We have summarized below the accounting policies that we believe are most critical to an understanding of the preparation of our financial statements. BASIS OF CONSOLIDATION. We report our financial information on a consolidated basis. Therefore, unless there is an indication to the contrary, financial information is provided for the parent company, The Leather Factory, Inc., and its subsidiaries as a whole. Transactions between the parent company and any subsidiaries are eliminated for this purpose. We own all of the capital stock of our subsidiaries, and we do not have any subsidiaries that are not consolidated. None of our subsidiaries is "off balance sheet". In 2000, we revisedREVENUE RECOGNITION. We recognize revenue for retail (over the presentationcounter) sales as transactions occur and other sales upon shipment of our products provided that there are no significant post-delivery obligations to the customer and collection is reasonably assured, which generally occurs upon shipment. Net sales represent gross sales less negotiated price allowances, product returns, and allowances for defective merchandise. ALLOWANCE FOR ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE. We reduce accounts receivable by an allowance for amounts that may become uncollectible in the future. This allowance is an estimate based primarily our evaluation of the customer's financial information from a single segment to three segments: Leather Factory, Tandy Leathercondition, past collection history, and Cushman. This information is found in Note 13, Segment Information, to our Consolidated Financial Statements. Segment information permits readers to review summary information on the operating results andaging of the account. If the financial condition of these segments. The inventory shown onany of our balance sheetcustomers deteriorates, resulting in an impairment or inability to make payments, additional allowances may be required. INVENTORY. Inventory is stated at the lower of cost or market and is accounted for on the "first in, first out" method. This means that sales of inventory treat the oldest item of identical inventory as being the first sold. If, however,In addition, we periodically reduce the market value of our inventory for slow-moving or obsolete inventory. This reduction is based on management's review of items on hand compared to their estimated future demand. If actual future demand is less favorable than what we paid for it,those projected by management, additional write-downs may be necessary. Goods shipped to us are recorded as inventory owned by us when the lower market value is recorded onrisk of loss shifts to us from the balance sheet.supplier. GOODWILL. We have indicated above that a change in the accounting rules will necessitatenecessitated a change in 2002 in how we report goodwill on our balance sheet. This may causeAs a result, we incurred an impairment write-down in the first quarter of 2002 of our investment in Cushman. We have retained an independent firm to make a valuation of Cushman to see if this step will be required. Until that valuation is received, we will not know the amount, if any of this write-down. If a write-down is made,in the amount of $4 million. The remaining goodwill on our balance sheet is analyzed by management periodically to determine the write-down will reduceappropriateness of its carry value. As of December 31, 2002, management has determined that the net incomepresent value of the discounted estimated future cash flows of the stores associated with the goodwill is sufficient to be reported bysupport their respective goodwill balances. If actual results of these stores differs significantly from management's projections, such difference could affect the Companypresent value calculation in 2002. 19the future resulting in an impairment of all or part of the goodwill currently carried on the Company's balance sheet. 21 Forward-Looking StatementsFORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS "Item 1. Business" and "Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" of this report contain forward-looking statements of management. In general, these are predictions or suggestions of future events and statements or expectations of future occurrences. There are certain important risks that could cause results to differ materially from those anticipated by some of the forward-looking statements. Some, but not all, of the important risks which could cause actual results to differ materially from those suggested by the forward-looking statements include, among other things: o- - Involvement by the United States in war and other military operations in the Middle East could disrupt international trade and affect the Company's inventory sources. - - The recent downturnslump in the economy in the United States, as well as abroad, may cause our sales to decrease or not to increase. oincrease or adversely affect the prices charged for our products. Also, hostilities, terrorism or other events could worsen this condition. - - As a result of the on-going threat of terrorist activitiesattacks on and after September 11, 2001,the United States, consumer buying habits could change and decrease our sales. o If terrorists choose to target livestock in the United States or abroad for chemical, biological or other attacks, our sources of raw material and inventory could decrease, or these items could become more expensive. o- - The prices of hides and leathers also fluctuate in normal times, and these fluctuations can affect the Company. o- - If, for whatever reason, the costs of our raw materials and inventory increase, we may not be able to pass those costs on to our customers, particularly if the economy has not recovered from its downturn. o- - Other factors could cause either fluctuations in buying patterns or possible negative trends in the craft and western retail markets. In addition, our customers may change their preferences to products other than ours, or they may not accept new products as we introduce them. o The Company currently buys in 22 countries around the world. War, terrorism, changes in the internal affairs or international relations of these countries (such as events that might affect their Most Favored Nation status with the United States of America) and other uncertainties can disrupt our purchases from abroad. o- - We might fail to realize the anticipated benefits of the recent acquisition of the assets of Tandy Leather, the opening of Tandy Leather retail stores or other retail initiatives might not be successful. o- - Tax or interest rates might increase. In particular, interest rates are likely to increase at some point from their present low levels. These increases will increase our costs of borrowing funds as needed in our business. o- - Any change in the commercial banking environment may affect us and our ability to borrow capital as needed. o- - Other uncertainties, which are difficult to predict and many of which are beyond the control of the Company, may occur as well. The Company does not intend to update forward-looking statements. 2022 ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK - ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- We face exposure to financial market risks, including adverse movement in foreign current exchange rates and changes in interest rates. These exposures may change over time and could have a material impact on our financial results. We do not use or invest in market risk sensitive instruments to hedge any of these risks or for any other purpose. FOREIGN CURRENCY EXCHANGE RATE RISK Our primary foreign currency exposure is related to our subsidiary in Canada. The Leather Factory of Canada, Ltd. has local currency (Canadian dollar) revenue and local currency operating expenses. Changes in the currency exchange rate impacts the U.S. dollar amount of revenue and expenses. See Note 12 to the Consolidated Financial Statements, Segment Information, for financial information concerning the Company's Credit Facility includes loansforeign activities. INTEREST RATE RISK We are subject to market risk associated with interest ratesrate movements on outstanding debt. Our borrowings under the credit facility with Wells Fargo accrue interest at a rate that varychanges with changesfluctuations in the prime rate. AnBased on the Company's level of debt at March 15, 2003, an increase of one percentage pointpercent in the prime rate would not haveresult in additional interest expense of approximately $60,000 during a material impact on the Company's future earnings.twelve-month period. ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA. - -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- The Financial Statements and Financial Statement Schedule are filed as a part of this report. See page 22, Index to Consolidated Financial Statements. ITEM 9. CHANGE IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL - -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE. - -------------------------------- 23 None 21 THE LEATHER FACTORY, INC. ------------------------- INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS ------------------------------------------ Consolidated Balance Sheets at December 31, 2002 and 2001 and 2000 ................. 2325 Consolidated Statements of OperationsIncome for the Years Ended December 31, 2002, 2001 and 2000 and 1999 ..........................2426 Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Years Ended December 31, 2002, 2001 and 2000 and 1999 ..........................2527 Consolidated Statements of Stockholders' Equity for the Years Ended December 31, 2002, 2001 and 2000 and 1999 ..........................2628 Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements ......................... 2729 Financial StatementStatements Schedules for the years ended December 31, 2002, 2001 2000, and 1999:2000: II - Valuation and Qualifying Accounts and Reserves ................4041 All other schedules are omitted since the required information is not present or is not present in amounts sufficient to require submission of the schedule or because the information required is included in the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto. ReportsReport of Independent Auditors .............................................41 2242 24
THE LEATHER FACTORY, INC. CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
December 31, December 31, 2002 2001 2000 ------------ ------------------------- -------------- ASSETS CURRENT ASSETS: Cash $ 409,040101,557 $ 234,141409,040 Cash restricted for payment on revolving credit facility 553,839 491,729 390,467 Accounts receivable-trade, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $78,000 and $191,000 in 2002 and $338,000 in 2001, and 2000, respectively 1,938,698 2,297,953 2,191,996 Inventory 12,695,344 9,054,269 9,205,898Prepaid income taxes 55,644 - Deferred income taxes 159,090 128,111 130,802 Other current assets 672,117 479,390 710,085 ------------ -------------------------- -------------- Total current assets 16,176,289 12,860,492 12,863,389 ------------ -------------------------- -------------- PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT, at cost 5,321,749 4,201,368 3,657,601 Less-accumulated depreciation and amortization (3,301,898) (2,858,869) (2,494,732) ------------ -------------------------- -------------- Property and equipment, net 2,019,851 1,342,499 1,162,869 GOODWILL, net of accumulated amortization of $734,000 and $1,583,000 in 2002 and $1,367,000 in 2001, and 2000, respectively 686,484 4,535,412 4,765,092 OTHER INTANGIBLES, net of accumulated amortization of $188,000$113,000 and $100,000,$66,000, in 2002 and 2001, and 2000, respectively 529,452 615,647483,507 476,908 OTHER assets 280,468 279,082 ------------ ------------309,471 333,012 -------------- -------------- $ 19,675,602 $ 19,548,323 $ 19,686,079 ============ ========================== ============== LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY CURRENT LIABILITIES: Accounts payable $ 1,594,909 $ 1,303,596 $2159,910 Accrued expenses and other liabilities 2,503,331 1,171,152 1,290,613 Income taxes payable - 52,662 94,795 Notes payable and current maturities of long-term debt 4,218,968 4,527,904 5,759,626 ------------ -------------------------- -------------- Total current liabilities 8,317,208 7,055,314 9,304,944 ------------ -------------------------- -------------- DEFERRED INCOME TAXES 186,076 61,647 72,473 NOTES PAYABLE AND LONG-TERM DEBT, net of current maturities 2,256 7,691 13,025 COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES -- --(Note 7) - - STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY: Preferred stock, $0.10 par value; 20,000,000 shares authorized, none issued or outstanding -- --- - Common stock, $0.0024 par value; 25,000,000 shares authorized, 9,991,16110,149,961 and 9,908,1619,991,161 shares issued and outstanding at 2002 and 2001, and 2000, respectively 24,360 23,979 23,780 Paid-in capital 4,163,901 4,030,508 3,946,608 Retained earnings 7,064,345 8,478,187 6,471,754 Less: Notes receivable - secured by common stock (44,003) (71,939) (120,339) Accumulated other comprehensive loss (38,541) (37,064) (26,166) ------------ -------------------------- -------------- Total stockholders' equity 11,170,062 12,423,671 10,295,637 ------------ -------------------------- -------------- $ 19,675,602 $ 19,548,323 $ 19,686,079 ============ ========================== ==============
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. 2325 THE LEATHER FACTORY, INC. CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2002, 2001 AND 2000
THE LEATHER FACTORY, INC. CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECMEBER 31,2002 2001 2000 AND 1999 2001 2000 1999 ------------ ------------ ----------------------- NET SALES $ 37,279,262 $ 30,095,264 $ 27,164,399$39,728,615 $37,279,262 $30,095,264 COST OF SALESGOODS SOLD 18,393,914 17,934,935 15,147,547 14,907,768 ------------ ------------ ----------------------- ----------- ----------- Gross profitProfit 21,334,701 19,344,327 14,947,717 12,256,631 OPERATING EXPENSES 17,202,927 15,442,359 11,702,633 10,346,420 ------------ ------------ ----------------------- ----------- ----------- INCOME FROM OPERATIONS 4,131,774 3,901,968 3,245,084 1,910,211 OTHER EXPENSE: Interest expenseExpense (246,878) (458,558) (617,400) (923,092) Other, net (65,039) (74,924) (36,379) 22,788 ------------ ------------ ----------------------- ----------- ----------- Total other expenseOther Expense (311,917) (533,482) (653,779) (900,304) ------------ ------------ ----------------------- ----------- ----------- INCOME BEFORE INCOME TAXES and CUMULATIVE EFFECT OF CHANGE IN ACCOUNTING PRINCIPLE 3,819,857 3,368,486 2,591,305 1,009,907 PROVISION FOR INCOME TAXES 1,224,868 1,362,053 1,049,985 574,851 ------------ ------------ ----------------------- ----------- ----------- INCOME BEFORE CUMULATIVE EFFECT OF CHANGE IN ACCOUNTING PRINCIPLE 2,594,989 2,006,433 1,541,320 CUMULATIVE EFFECT OF CHANGE IN ACCOUNTING PRINCIPLE (4,008,831) - - ----------- ----------- ----------- NET INCOME (LOSS) $(1,413,842) $2,006,433 $1,541,320 =========== =========== =========== NET INCOME (LOSS) PER COMMON SHARE - BASIC: Income before Cumulative Effect of Accounting Principle $ 2,006,433 $ 1,541,320 $ 435,056 ============ ============ ============0.26 $0.20 $0.16 Cumulative Effect of Change in Accounting Principle, net (0.40) - - ----------- ----------- ----------- NET INCOME PER COMMON SHARE $(0.14) $0.20 $0.16 =========== =========== =========== NET INCOME (LOSS) PER COMMON SHARE - DILUTED: Income before Cumulative Effect of Accounting Principle $ 0.20 $ 0.16 $ 0.04 ============ ============ ============0.24 $0.19 $0.15 Cumulative Effect of Change in Accounting Principle, net (0.37) - - ----------- ----------- ----------- NET INCOME PER COMMON SHARE--Assuming Dilution $ 0.19 $ 0.15 $ 0.04 ============ ============ ============SHARE - DILUTED $(0.13) $0.19 $0.15 =========== =========== =========== WEIGHTED AVERAGE NUMBER OF SHARES: Basic 10,063,581 9,976,181 9,875,606 Diluted 10,761,670 10,449,306 10,182,803
The accompanyaccompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. 2426 THE LEATHER FACTORY, INC. CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOW FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2002, 2001, AND 2000
THE LEATHER FACTORY, INC. CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOW (UNAUDITED) FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31,2002 2001 2000 AND 1999 2001 2000 1999 ----------- ----------- ----------------------- ------------ ------------ CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:ACTIVITIES Net income $ 2,006,433 $ 1,541,320 $ 435,056(loss) $(1,413,842) $2,006,433 $1,541,320 Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by operating activities-activities - Depreciation and amortization 491,312 730,153 582,778 567,452 Loss on disposal of assets - 5,588 5,089 -- Amortization of deferred financing costs 37,038 45,753 44,804 225,953Deferred income taxes (30,184) (8,135) 4,056 Other (19,033) (128) 13,426(2,502) (10,898) (4,184) Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle 4,008,831 - - Net changes in assets and liabilities, net of effects of business acquisitions: Accounts receivable-trade, net 359,255 (105,957) 368,848 (710,186) Inventory (3,463,866) 151,629 1,562,274 (1,851,357) Income taxes 16,124 (42,133) (379,467) 615,201 Other current assets (192,726) 230,695 83,990 (294,684) Accounts payable 291,311 (856,314) (137,686) 786,849 Accrued expenses and other liabilities 1,332,179 (119,461) 230,732 448,180 ----------- ----------- ----------------------- ------------ ------------ Total adjustments 2,846,772 20,920 2,361,234 (199,166) ----------- ----------- ----------------------- ------------ ------------ Net cash provided by operating activities 1,432,930 2,027,353 3,902,554 235,890 ----------- ----------- ----------------------- ------------ ------------ CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:ACTIVITIES Purchase of property and equipment (1,073,515) (629,773) (377,840) (254,274) Payments in connection with businessbusinesses acquired --(435,747) - (2,999,159) -- Proceeds from sale of assets - 3,200 2,484 -- (Increase) decrease in other assets (14,754) (1,386) 2,519 2,235 Other intangible costs -- -- (8,174) ----------- ----------- -----------(1,625) - - ------------ ------------ ------------ Net cash used in investing activities (1,525,641) (627,959) (3,371,996) (260,213) ----------- ----------- ----------------------- ------------ ------------ CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES: Net increase (decrease) in revolving credit loans (286,889) (1,150,543) (167,687) 2,220,664 Proceeds from notes payable and long-term debt -- -- 150,000 Payments on notes payable and long-term debt (27,482) (105,189) (243,083) (2,605,453) Increase in cash restricted for payment on revolving creditfacilitycredit loans (62,110) (101,262) (72,563) (85,066) Payments received on notes secured by common stock 27,936 48,400 33,077 71,334 Deferred financing costs incurred --- - (25,626) (103,090) Proceeds from issuance of common stock 133,774 84,099 45,000 -- ----------- ----------- ----------------------- ------------ ------------ Net cash used in financing activities (214,772) (1,224,495) (430,882) (351,611) ----------- ----------- ----------------------- ------------ ------------ NET INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH (307,483) 174,899 99,676 (375,934) CASH, beginning of period 409,040 234,141 134,465 510,399 ----------- ----------- ----------------------- ------------ ------------ CASH, end of period $ 409,040 $ 234,141 $ 134,465 =========== =========== ===========$101,557 $409,040 $234,141 ============ ============ ============ SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURES OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION: Interest paid during the period $ 443,925 $ 572,577 $ 697,996$213,791 $443,925 $572,557 Income taxestax paid during the period net of (refunds)1,254,679 1,414,404 1,424,648 (57,681) NON-CASH INVESTING ACTIVITIES: Equipment acquired under capital lease financing arrangements $ 18,676 $ -- $ 217,493- $18,676 -
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. 25
THE LEATHER FACTORY, INC. CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY (UNAUDITED) FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2001, 2000 AND 1999 Common Stock ---------------------------- Notes Number Par Paid-in Retained - secured by of shares value capital earnings common stock ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ BALANCE, December 31, 1998 9,853,161 $ 23,648 $ 3,901,740 $ 4,495,378 $ (224,750) Payments on notes receivable - Secured by common stock -- -- -- -- 71,334 Net Income -- -- -- 435,056 -- Translation adjustment -- -- -- -- -- ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ BALANCE, December 31, 1999 9,853,161 $ 23,648 $ 3,901,740 $ 4,930,434 $ (153,416) Comprehensive income for the year ended December 31, 1999 Payments on notes receivable - secured by common stock -- -- -- -- 33,077 Shares issued - stock options exercised 55,000 132 44,868 -- -- Net Income -- -- -- 1,541,320 -- Translation adjustment -- -- -- -- -- ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ BALANCE, December 31, 2000 9,908,161 $ 23,780 $ 3,946,608 $ 6,471,754 $ (120,339) Comprehensive income for the year ended December 31, 2000 Payments on notes receivable - secured by common stock -- -- -- -- 48,400 Shares issued - stock options exercised 83,000 199 83,900 -- -- Net Income -- -- -- 2,006,433 -- Translation adjustment -- -- -- -- -- ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ BALANCE, December 31, 2001 9,991,161 $ 23,979 $ 4,030,508 $ 8,478,187 $ (71,939) ============ ============ ============ ============ ============ Comprehensive income for the year ended December 31, 2001 The accompany notes are an integral part of these financial statements. 26 THE LEATHER FACTORY, INC. CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY (UNAUDITED) CONTINUED FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2001, 2000 AND 1999 Accumulated Other Comprehensive Cumulative Income Loss Total (Loss) ------------ ------------ ------------ BALANCE, December 31, 1998 $ (25,738) $ 8,170,278 Payments on notes receivable - Secured by common stock -- 71,334 Net Income -- 435,056 435,056 Translation adjustment 3,757 3,757 3,757 ------------ ------------ BALANCE, December 31, 1999 $ (21,981) $ 8,680,425 ------------ Comprehensive income for the year ended December 31, 1999 $ 438,813 ============ Payments on notes receivable - secured by common stock -- 33,077 Shares issued - stock options exercised -- 45,000 Net Income -- 1,541,320 1,541,320 Translation adjustment (4,185) (4,185) (4,185) ------------ ------------ BALANCE, December 31, 2000 $ (26,166) $ 10,295,637 ------------ Comprehensive income for the year ended December 31, 2000 $ 1,537,135 ============ Payments on notes receivable - secured by common stock -- 48,400 Shares issued - stock options exercised -- 84,099 Net Income -- 2,006,433 2,006,433 Translation adjustment (10,898) (10,898) (10,898) ------------ ------------ BALANCE, December 31, 2001 $ (37,064) $ 12,423,671 ============ ============ ------------ Comprehensive income for the year ended December 31, 2001 $ 1,995,535 ============
The accompany notes are an integral part of these financial statements. 27 THE LEATHER FACTORY, INC. CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2002, 2001 AND 2000
Common Stock --------------------------------- Number Par Paid-in Retained of shares value capital earnings ------------- ----------------- ---------- --------------- BALANCE, December 31, 1999 9,853,161 $ 23,648 $3,901,740 $ 4,930,434 Payments on notes receivable secured by common stock - - - - Shares issued - stock options exercised 55,000 132 44,868 - Net income - - - 1,541,320 Translation adjustment - - - - ------------ ----------------- ---------- --------------- BALANCE, December 31, 2000 9,908,161 $ 23,780 $3,946,608 $ 6,471,754 Payments on notes receivable secured by common stock - - - - Shares issued - stock options exercised 83,000 199 83,900 - Net income - - - 2,006,433 Translation adjustment - - - - ------------ ----------------- ---------- --------------- BALANCE, December 31, 2001 9,991,161 $ 23,979 $4,030,508 $ 8,478,187 Payments on notes receivable secured by common stock - - - - Shares issued - stock options and warrants exercised 158,800 381 133,393 - Net loss - - - (1,413,842) Translation adjustment - - - - ------------ ----------------- ---------- --------------- BALANCE, December 31, 2002 10,149,961 $ 24,360 $4,163,901 $ 7,064,345 ============ ================= ========== =============== Notes Accumulated Receivable Other Comprehensive secured by Cumulative Income common stock Loss Total (Loss) -------------- ------------ ----------- ---------------- BALANCE, December 31, 1999 $ (153,416) $ (21,981) $ 8,680,425 Payments on notes receivable secured by common stock 33,077 - 33,077 Shares issued - stock options exercised - - 45,000 Net income - - 1,541,320 $ 1,541,320 Translation adjustment - (4,185) (4,185) (4,185) -------------- ------------ ----------- ---------------- BALANCE, December 31, 2000 $ (120,339) $ (26,166) $10,295,637 Comprehensive income for the year ended December 31, 2000 $ 1,537,135 ================ Payments on notes receivable secured by common stock 48,400 - 48,400 Shares issued - stock options exercised - - 84,099 Net Income - - 2,006,433 2,006,433 Translation adjustment - (10,898) (10,898) (10,898) -------------- ------------ ----------- ---------------- BALANCE, December 31, 2001 $ (71,939) $ (37,064) $12,423,671 Comprehensive income for the year ended December 31, 2001 $ 1,995,535 ================ Payments on notes receivable secured by common stock 27,936 - 27,936 Shares issued - stock options and warrants exercised - - 133,774 Net Loss - - (1,413,842) (1,413,842) Translation adjustment - (1,477) (1,477) (1,477) -------------- ------------ ----------- ---------------- BALANCE, December 31, 2002 $ (44,003) $ (38,541) $11,170,062 ============== ============ =========== Comprehensive loss for the year ended December 31, 2002 $ (1,415,319) ================
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. 28 THE LEATHER FACTORY, INC. NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS DECEMBER 31, 2002, 2001, AND 2000 and1999 1. ORGANIZATION AND NATURE OF OPERATIONS The Leather Factory, Inc. and subsidiaries (the "Company") is engaged in the manufacture and distribution of a broad product line of leather, leather crafts and finished goods,leathercrafts, western apparel and related accessory items. The Company operates sales/distribution units in 20 statesstores throughout the United States and Canada. Numerous customers including retailers, wholesalers, assemblers, distributors and other manufacturers geographically disbursed throughout the world purchase the Company's products. The Company also has light manufacturing facilities in Texas and New York. Certain reclassifications have been made to conform the 2000 and 2001 financial statements to the presentation in 2002. The reclassifications had no effect on net income. 2. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES ConsolidationCONSOLIDATION The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its subsidiaries, all of which are wholly-owned. Significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. InventoryINVENTORY The Company's inventory is valued at the lower of first-in, first-out cost or market and consists of the following at December 31: 2001 2000 ---------- ---------- Finished goods held for sale $8,025,845 $8,175,429 Raw Materials and work in process 1,028,424 1,030,469 ---------- ---------- $9,054,269 $9,205,898 Property and Equipmentmarket. PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT Property and equipment are stated at cost. Expenditures for maintenance and repairs are charged to expense when incurred. The cost of assets retired or sold and the related amounts of accumulated depreciation are removed from the accounts, and any gain or loss is included in the statement of income. Depreciation is determined using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives as follows: Leasehold improvements 5-7 years Equipment 5-10 years Furniture and fixtures 5-7 years Automobiles 5 years Depreciation expense was $460,741, $358,787;$443,029, $460,741; and $347,651$358,787 for the years ended December 31, 2002, 2001 and 2000, respectively. GOODWILL In June 2001, the FASB issued Statements of Financial Accounting Standards ("SFAS") No. 142, Goodwill and 1999, respectively. Goodwill Goodwill resulting from business purchases accounted for using the purchase method of accounting is being amortized on a straight-line basis over estimatedOther Intangible Assets. This standard requires companies to stop amortizing goodwill and certain intangible assets with indefinite useful lives. Instead, goodwill and intangible assets deemed to have indefinite useful lives ranging from tenare subject to forty years.an annual review of impairment. The new standard was effective for the Company assessesin the recoverabilityfirst quarter of 2002. Upon adoption of SFAS No. 142, the Company recorded a one-time, noncash charge of approximately $4.0 million to eliminate the carrying value of its goodwill by determining whetherrelating to its subsidiary, Roberts, Cushman & Co., Inc. This charge is non-operational in nature and is reflected as a cumulative effect of an accounting change in the asset balance can be recovered over its remaining life through undiscounted future operating cash flowsaccompanying consolidated statement of income. For additional discussion on the acquired asset. The amountimpact of impairment, if any, is measured based on projected discounted future operating cash flows. Amortization expense of $223,894 in 2001, $208,411 in 2000; and $208,913 in 1999 was recorded in operating expenses. 28 Advertising Costsadopting SFAS No. 142, see Note 13. ADVERTISING COSTS With the exception of catalog costs, advertising costs are expensed as incurred. Catalog costs are capitalized and expensed over the estimated useful life of the particular catalog in question, which is typically twelve to eighteen months. Such capitalized costs are included in other current assets and totaled $162,495$116,611 and $40,579$162,495 at December 31, 20012002 and 2000,2001, respectively. Total advertising expense was $2,023,527;$2,265,659 in 2002; $2,023,527 in 2001; and $1,353,520 in 2000;2000. REVENUE RECOGNITION Retail (over the counter) sales are recorded as transactions occur and $1,040,671 in 1999. Revenue Recognition Salesother sales are recorded when goods are shipped to customers. Income TaxesINCOME TAXES Deferred income taxes result from temporary differences in the basis of assets and liabilities reported for financial statement and income tax purposes. Earnings Per Share The Company computes earnings (loss) per share in accordance with the requirements of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 128, Earnings per Share ("SFAS 128"). SFAS No. 128 requires the disclosure of both "basic" and "diluted" earnings per share.EARNINGS PER SHARE Basic earnings per share is computed by dividing income available to common stockholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding. Diluted earnings per share is computed by dividing income available to common stockholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding increased for potentially dilutive common shares outstanding during the period. The dilutive effect of stock options, warrants and their equivalents is calculated using the treasury stock method. Unearned shares, if any, held by the Employees' Stock Ownership Plan are deemed not to be outstanding for earnings per share calculations. Accounting EstimatesACCOUNTING ESTIMATES The consolidated financial statements include estimates and assumptions made by management that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, the reported amounts of revenues and expenses and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Long-Lived AssetsALLOWANCE FOR DOUBTFUL ACCOUNTS The Company reduces its accounts receivable by an allowance for amounts that may become uncollectible in the future. This allowance is an estimate based primarily on the aging of the accounts as well as management's evaluation of the financial condition and past collection history of each customer. LONG-LIVED ASSETS SFAS No. 121,144, Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets, and for Long-Lived Assets to be Disposed of, requires that long-lived assets and certain identifiable intangible assets be reviewed for impairment whenever events indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. The Company determined that as of December 31, 20012002 and 2000,2001, it had no long-lived assets that met the impairment criteria of SFAS No. 121. Stock-Based Compensation144. STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION SFAS No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation, establishesand SFAS No. 148, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation - Transition and Disclosure - an amendment of FASB Statement 123 (see Note 14), establish financial accounting and reporting standards and disclosures for stock-based employee compensation plans. As permitted by SFAS No. 123, the Company has elected to continue to use Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees ("APB 25") and related Interpretations, in accounting for its stock option plans. Foreign Currency TranslationPro forma information regarding net income and earnings per share is required by SFAS No. 123 and SFAS No. 148 and has been determined as if the Company had accounted for its stock options under the fair value method. The fair value for these options was estimated at the date of grant using the Black Scholes option pricing model with the following weighted-average assumptions: risk-free interest rates of 3.00% in 2002; 3.50% in 2001; and 5.75% in 2000; dividend yields of 0% for all years; volatility factors of .736 for 2002, .780 for 2001, ..821 for 2000; and an expected life of the valued options of 5 years. Option valuation models require the input of highly subjective assumptions, including the expected stock price volatility, and changes in these input assumptions can materially affect the fair value estimate they produce. Because of this, it is management's opinion that existing models do not necessarily provide a reliable single measure of fair value for the Company's stock options. For pro forma disclosures, the estimated fair values determined by the model are being amortized to expense on a straight-line basis over the options vesting period as adjusted for estimated forfeitures. The Company's pro forma information follows:
2002 2001 2000 ------------ ---------- ---------- Net income (loss), as reported $(1,413,842) $2,006,433 $1,541,320 Deduct: Total stock-based employee compensation expense determined under fair based method for all awards, net of related tax effects 103,619 28,539 121,627 ------------ ---------- ---------- Pro forma net income (loss) $(1,517,461) $1,977,894 $1,419,693 ============ ========== ========== Earnings per share: Basic - as reported $ (0.14) $ 0.20 $ 0.16 Basic - pro forma $ (0.15) $ 0.20 $ 0.14 Diluted - as reported $ (0.13) $ 0.19 $ 0.15 Diluted - pro forma $ (0.14) $ 0.19 $ 0.14
FOREIGN CURRENCY TRANSLATION Foreign currency translation adjustments arise from activities of the Company's Canadian operations. Results of operations are translated into U.S. dollars using the average exchange rates during the period, while assets and liabilities are translated using period-end exchange rates. Foreign currency translation adjustments of assets and liabilities are recorded in stockholders' equity. Comprehensive IncomeCOMPREHENSIVE INCOME Comprehensive income represents all changes in stockholders' equity, exclusive of transactions with stockholders. The accumulated balance of foreign currency translation adjustments is presented in the consolidated financial statements as "accumulated other comprehensive income or loss". 29 3. BALANCE SHEET COMPONENTS
3.DECEMBER 31, 2002 2001 ----------- ---------- INVENTORY: Finished goods held for sale $11,693,868 $8,025,845 Raw materials and work in process 1,001,476 1,028,424 ----------- ---------- Total $12,695,344 $9,054,269 =========== ========== PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT: Leasehold improvements $1,043,076 $ 470,709 Equipment 3,407,332 2,987,518 Furniture and fixtures 839,326 711,126 Autos 32,015 32,015 ----------- ---------- 5,321,749 4,201,368 Less: accumulated depreciation and amortization (3,301,898) (2,858,869) ----------- ---------- Total $2,019,851 $1,342,499 =========== ========== OTHER CURRENT ASSETS Other current assets consisted of the following at December 31: 2001 2000 ---------- ----------ASSETS: Accounts receivable - employees $ 40,55021,977 $ 106,37040,550 Accounts receivable - other 23,364 29,546 360,029 Prepaid expenses 362,698 349,242 177,535Payments on merchandise not received 264,078 54,518 Other 60,052 66,151- 5,534 ----------- ---------- ----------Total $ 672,117 $ 479,390 $ 710,085=========== ========== ========== 4. ACCRUED EXPENSES AND OTHER LIABILITIES Accrued expenses and other liabilities consisted of the following at December 31: 2001 2000 ---------- ----------LIABILITIES: Accrued bonuses $ 706,696934,191 $ 784,528706,696 Accrued payroll 226,501 146,730 118,138 Accrued ESOP contribution 28,100 25,000 86,000 Sales and payroll taxes payable 95,849 55,482 52,851Inventory in transit 1,000,000 - Other 218,690 237,244 249,096----------- ---------- ----------Total $2,503,331 $1,171,152 $1,290,613 ========== ========== 5. NOTES PAYABLE AND LONG-TERM DEBT On November 19, 1999, the Company entered into a Credit and Security Agreement, as amended, with Wells Fargo Business Credit, Inc. ("WFBC"), pursuant to which WFBC agreed to provide a credit facility of up to $8,650,000 in debt (the "Debt Facility"). The Debt Facility has a three-year term and is made up of a revolving credit facility and a $150,000 term note. The term note was paid in full on May 1, 2000.=========== ==========
30 4. NOTES PAYABLE AND LONG-TERM DEBT On March 20, 2002, the Company entered into a Credit and Security Agreement with Wells Fargo Bank Minnesota, N.A. ("Wells Fargo"), pursuant to which Wells Fargo agreed to provide a revolving credit facility of up to $7,500,000. The revolver bears interest at prime or, at the Company's option, the London interbank eurodollar market rate ("LIBOR") plus 2.60%. The agreement terminates on November 30, 2004. Proceeds of the closing of the Credit Facility were used to pay all amounts due and owing by the Company pursuant to the Credit and Security Agreement, as amended, by and between the Company and Wells Fargo Business Credit, Inc. ("WFBC"). At closing, the Company's revolving line of credit with WFBC in the principal amount of $2,980,242 was satisfied in its entirety. At December 31, 2002 and 2001, and 2000, the amounts outstanding under the above agreements and other long-term debt consisted of the following:
2002 2001 2000 ---------- --------------------- ----------- Credit and Security Agreement with Wells Fargo - collateralized by all of the assets of the Company; payable as follows: Revolving Note dated March 20, 2002 in the maximum principal amount of $7,500,000 with revolving features as more fully described below - interest due monthly at prime (4.25% at December 31, 2002); matures November 30, 2004 $4,213,533 - Credit and Security Agreement with WFBC - collateralized by all of the assets of the Company; payable as follows: Revolving Note dated November 19, 1999 in the maximum principal amount of $8,500,000 with revolving features as more fully described below - interest due monthly at prime (4.75% at December 31, 2001); matures November 30, 2002- $4,500,422 $5,650,965 Capital LeasesLease secured by computer equipment - total monthly principal and interest payments of $9,896$572 at approximately 12% interest; maturing in February 2002 to February 2004 7,691 35,173 121,686----------- ---------- ----------4,221,224 4,535,595 5,772,651 Less - Current maturities (see below) 4,218,968 4,527,904 5,759,626 --------------------- ---------- $ 2,256 $ 7,691 $ 13,025=========== ==========
The Company periodically hascurrent portion of long-term debt includes the Wells Fargo revolving credit facility although this obligation does not mature until November 30, 2004. The classification of this debt was attributable to an accounting requirement that a revolving credit agreement that includes both a subjective acceleration clause and a requirement to maintain an arrangement, whereby cash collections from the borrower's customers directly reduce the debt outstanding, lettersto be classified as a short-term obligation (Emerging Issues Task Force Issue 95-22). A covenant of the facility is that collections from customers are to be deposited into a cash collateral account that directly pays down the revolving credit for inventory purchase commitments with terms ranging from sight to 90 days. Asloan. The balance in this account comprises the restricted cash on the Company's balance sheet. Because of December 31, 2001, there were no lettersthis arrangement and the fact that the debt agreement contains a clause that would allow acceleration of credit outstanding.payment of the debt in case of a "material adverse change", this rule applies. Management does not believe that any such acceleration will occur. Pursuant to the Credit and Security Agreement with WFBC,Wells Fargo, the overall combined borrowings under the Revolving Credit Loanrevolving credit loan and outstanding balance on letters of credit is limited to a combined amount of $8,500,000.$7,500,000. Of the $8,500,000$7,500,000 limit, letters of credit cannot exceed $500,000. The unused portion of the letter of credit limit can be utilized for borrowings, up to the limits imposed for the indebtedness. As of December 31, 2002, there were no letters of credit outstanding. Total borrowings under this arrangement are subject to a percentage of trade accounts receivable and inventory reduced by the outstanding balance of letters of credit and any required reserves. The unused portion of the credit facility at December 31, 2001 and 20002002 was $757,173 and $884,759, respectively.$2,413,556. The terms of the DebtCredit Facility contain various covenants which among other things require the Company to maintain a certain level of income and book net worth and limit capital expenditures. Other covenants prohibit the Company from incurring indebtedness except as permitted by the terms of the DebtCredit Facility, from declaring or paying cash dividends upon any of its stock and from entering into any new business or making material changes in any of the Company's business objectives, purposes or operations. 30
Scheduled maturities of the Company's notes payable and long-term debt are as follows: 2002 $4,527,904
2003 6,557$4,218,968 2004 1,1342,256 2005 --- 2006 - ---------- $4,535,595 On March 20, 2002, the Company entered into a Credit and Security Agreement with Wells Fargo Bank Minnesota, N.A. ("Wells Fargo"), which replaced the Company's previous borrowing arrangement with WFBC. The Credit Facility consists of a maximum revolving line of credit of $7,500,000. The revolver bears interest at prime and matures on November 30, 2004. The agreement contains covenants similar to that of the WFBC Debt Facility regarding net income and book net worth levels, capital expenditure limits, and the prohibition of declaring or paying cash dividends. 6. EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLAN The Company has an Employee Stock Ownership Plan (the "Plan") for employees with at least one year of service (as defined by the Plan) and who have reached their 21st birthday. Under the Plan, the Company makes annual cash or stock contributions to a trust for the benefit of eligible employees. The trust invests in shares of the Company's common stock. The amount of the Company's annual contribution is discretionary. Benefits under the Plan are 100% vested after three years of service and are payable upon termination of employment as defined by the Plan. In the event of death, disability or retirement, the participant's accrued benefit becomes 100% non-forfeitable and is distributed as defined by the Plan.$4,221,224 ==========
31 5. EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLAN The Company has an Employee Stock Ownership Plan (the "Plan") for employees with at least one year of service (as defined by the Plan) and who have reached their 21st birthday. Under the Plan, the Company makes annual cash or stock contributions to a trust for the benefit of eligible employees. The trust invests in shares of the Company's common stock. The amount of the Company's annual contribution is discretionary. Benefits under the Plan are 100% vested after three years of service and are payable upon death, disability or retirement. Vested benefits are payable upon termination of employment. The Company applies Statement of Position 93-6 (SOP 93-6"), "Employers' Accounting for Employee Stock Ownership Plans," of the Accounting Standards Division of the American Institute of CPAs. During 2002, 2001, and 2000, respectively, the Company contributed $345,312; $277,892; and $249,017 in cash as current year contributions to the plan and recognized compensation expense related to these payments. The following table summarizes the number of shares held by the Plan and the market value as of December 31, 2002, 2001, and 2000:
NO. OF SHARES MARKET VALUE -------------------------- -------------------------------- 2002 2001 2000 and 1999, respectively, the Company contributed $277,892, $249,017; and $208,214 in cash as current year contributions to the plan and recognized compensation expense related to these payments. The following table summarizes the number of shares held by the Plan and the market value as of December 31,2002 2001 2000 and 1999: . No. of Shares Market Value ------------- ------------ 2001 2000 1999 2001 2000 1999------- ------- ------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ------------------ Allocated 956,320 895,928 808,539 598,132$3,232,362 $1,863,530 $ 808,539 $ 486,281$808,539 Unearned -- -- -- -- -- -- ------------------------------------ ------------------------------------- - - - - - ------- ------- ------- ---------- ---------- -------- Total 956,320 895,928 808,539 598,132$3,232,362 $1,863,530 $ 808,539 $ 486,281 ==================================== ====================================$808,539 ======= ======= ======= ========== ========== ========
The Company currently offers no postretirement or postemployment benefits to its employees. 7.6. INCOME TAXES The provision for income taxes consists of the following: 2001 2000 1999 ----------- ----------- ----------- Current provision: Federal $ 1,154,847 $ 849,994 $ 370,053 State 218,717 191,070 207,171 ----------- ----------- ----------- 1,373,564 1,041,064 577,224 ----------- ----------- ----------- Deferred provision (benefit): Federal (11,299) 7,418 (2,373) State (212) 1,503 -- ----------- ----------- ----------- (11,511) 8,921 (2,373) ----------- ----------- ----------- $ 1,362,053 $ 1,049,985 $ 574,851 =========== =========== ===========
2002 2001 2000 ---------- ---------- ---------- Current provision (benefit): Federal $1,078,146 $1,154,847 $ 849,994 State 51,556 218,717 191,070 ---------- ---------- ---------- 1,129,702 1,373,564 1,041,064 ---------- ---------- ---------- Deferred provision (benefit): Federal 82,014 (11,299) 7,418 State 13,152 (212) 1,503 ---------- ---------- ---------- 95,166 (11,511) 8,921 ---------- ---------- ---------- $1,224,868 $1,362,053 $1,049,985 ========== ========== ==========
The income tax effects of temporary differences that give rise to significant portions of deferred income tax assets and liabilities are as follows: 31
2002 2001 2000 --------- --------- Deferred income tax assets: Allowance for doubtful accounts $ 28,450 $ 33,621$28,780 $28,450 Capitalized inventory costs 115,590 90,942 88,575 Accrued expenses, reserves, and other 14,720 8,719 8,606 --------- --------- Total deferred income tax assets 159,090 128,111 130,802 --------- --------- Deferred income tax liabilities: Property and equipment depreciation 171,601 55,750 63,395 Goodwill and other intangible assets amortization 15,380 12,577 11,643 Tax effect of translation adjustment and other (905) (6,680) (2,565) --------- --------- Total deferred income tax liabilities 186,076 61,647 72,473 --------- --------- Net deferred tax asset $ 66,464 $ 58,329(liability) $(26,986) $66,464 ========= =========
The effective tax rate differs from the statutory rate as follows: 2002 2001 2000 1999 ----- ----- ----- Statutory rate 34% 34% 34% State and local taxes 1% 3% 7% 20% Non-deductible goodwill amortization 0% 2% 3% 8% Other (3%) 1% (3%) (5%) ----- ----- ----- Effective rate 32% 40% 41% 57% ===== ===== ===== 8.
32 7. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES Operating LeasesOPERATING LEASES The Company's primary office facility and warehouse are leased under a five-year lease agreement that expires in March 2003.2008. Rental agreements for the sales/distribution units expire on dates ranging from October 2002July 2003 to March 2007.August 2008. The Company's lease agreement for the manufacturing facility in Long Island City, New York, expires on June 30, 2003. Rent expense on all operating leases for the years ended December 31, 2002, 2001, and 2000, was $1,465,577, $1,299,582, and 1999, was $1,299,582, $1,106,171; and $1,047,882,$1,106,171, respectively. Capital LeasesCAPITAL LEASES The Company leases certain computer and warehouse equipment under capital lease agreements. Assets subject to the agreements totaling $365,252$18,651 and $346,601$365,252 and related accumulated depreciation of $249,470$4,885 and $177,929$249,470 are included in property and equipment as of December 31, 2002 and 2001, and 2000, respectively. CommitmentsCOMMITMENTS Future minimum lease payments under capital and noncancelable operating leases at December 31, 20012002 were as follows: 32
Capital Operating Leases LeasesCAPITAL OPERATING LEASES LEASES ------- ---------- Year ending December 31: 2002 $ 28,564 $1,360,546 2003 6,859 962,731$6,859 $1,594,438 2004 1,143 536,5311,277,163 2005 -- 370,118- 1,114,538 2006 - 958,249 2007 and thereafter -- 241,938 ------------------------ 800,517 ------- ---------- Total minimum lease payments 36,566 $3,471,864 ==========8,002 $5,744,905 Less amount representing interest 1,393 ----------311 ========== ------- Present value of net minimum capital lease payments 35,1737,691 Less current installments of minimum capital lease payments 27,482 ----------5,435 ------- Long-term capital lease obligations, excluding current installments $ 7,691 ==========$2,256 =======
LitigationLITIGATION The Company is involved in various litigation that arisearises in the ordinary course of its business and operations. There are no such matters pending that the Company expects to have a material impact on its financial position and results of operations. 9.8. SIGNIFICANT BUSINESS CONCENTRATIONS AND RISK Major Customers - ---------------- The Company's revenues are derived from a diverse group of customers primarily involved in the sale of leather crafts and western apparel items.crafts. While no single customer accounts for more than 10% of the Company's consolidated revenues in 2002, 2001 2000 and 1999,2000, sales to the Company's five largest customers represented 15%, 14%15% and 19%14%, respectively, of consolidated revenues in those years. While management does not believe the loss of one of these customers would have a negative impact on the Company's operations, it does believe the loss of several of these customers simultaneously or a substantial reduction in sales generated by them could temporarily affect the Company's operating results. Major Vendors - -------------- The Company purchases a significant portion of its inventory through one supplier. Due to the number of alternative sources of supply, loss of this supplier would not have an adverse impact on the Company's operations. Credit Risk - ------------ Due to the large number of customers comprising the Company's customer base, concentrations of credit risk with respect to customer receivables are limited. At December 31, 2002 and 2001, 20% and 2000, 23% and 18%, respectively, of the Company's consolidated accounts receivable were due from three nationally recognized retail chains. The Company does not generally require collateral for accounts receivable, but performs periodic credit evaluations of its customers and believes the allowance for doubtful accounts is adequate. It is management's opinion that if any one or a group of customer receivable balances should be deemed uncollectable,uncollectible, it would not have a material adverse effect on the Company's results of operations and financial condition. 33
10.9. EARNINGS PER SHARE The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted earnings per share:
2002 2001 2000 1999 ----------- ----------- --------------------- Numerator: Net income $ 2,006,433 $ 1,541,320 $ 435,056(loss) $(1,413,842) $2,006,433 $1,541,320 ---------- ---------- ---------- Numerator for basic and diluted earnings per -- -- -- share (1,413,842) 2,006,433 1,541,320 435,056 Denominator: Denominator for basic earnings per share - weighted-average shares 10,063,581 9,976,181 9,875,606 9,853,161 Effect of dilutive securities: Stock options 477,005 265,621 134,300 5,019 Warrants 221,084 207,504 172,897 31,918 ----------- ----------- --------------------- ---------- ---------- Dilutive potential common shares 698,089 473,125 307,197 36,937 ----------- ----------- --------------------- ---------- ---------- Denominator for diluted earnings per share - adjusted weighted-average shares and assumed conversions 10,761,670 10,449,306 10,182,803 9,890,098 =========== =========== ===================== ========== ========== Basic earnings per share $ (0.14) $ 0.20 $ 0.16 $ 0.04 =========== =========== ===================== ========== Diluted earnings per share $ (0.13) $ 0.19 $ 0.15 $ 0.04 =========== =========== ===================== ==========
For additional disclosures regarding the employee stock options and the warrants, see note 11.Note 10. Unexercised employee and director stock options to purchase -0- and 2,000 shares of common stock as of December 31, 2002 and 2001, respectively, were not included in the computations of diluted earnings per share ("EPS") because the options' exercise prices were greater than or equal to the average market prices of the common stock and, therefore, the effect would be antidilutive. The net effect of converting stock options and warrants to purchase 844,000762,200 and 452,000844,000 shares of common stock at option prices less than the average market prices has been included in the computations of diluted EPS for the years ended December 31, 2002 and 2001, and 2000, respectively. 11.34 10. STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY Stock Option PlansSTOCK OPTION PLANS 1995 Stock Option Plan - ----------------------------------------------- In connection with its 1995 Stock Option Plan for officers and key management employees, the Company has outstanding options to purchase its common stock. The plan provides for the granting of either qualified incentive stock options or non-qualified options at the discretion of the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors. Options are granted at the fair market value of the underlying common stock at the date of grant and vest over a five-year period. The Company has reserved 1,000,000 shares of common stock for issuance under this plan. 1995 Director Non-Qualified Stock Option Plan - ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- In connection with its 1995 Director Non-qualified Stock Option Plan for non-employee directors, the Company has outstanding options to purchase its common stock. The plan provides for the granting of non-qualified options at the discretion of the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors. Options are granted at the fair market value of the underlying common stock at the date of grant and vest after six months. The Company has reserved 100,000 shares of common stock for issuance under this plan. 34
Stock Option Summary - --------------------Stock Option Summary - ---------------------- All options expire ten years from the date of grant and are exercisable at any time after vesting. Of the combined 1,100,000 shares available for issuance under the two plans, at December 31, 2002, 2001 and 2000, there were 106,000; 116,000; and 587,000; respectively, in un-optioned shares reserved for future grants. A summary of stock option transactions for the years ended December 31, 2002, 2001, and are exercisable at any time after vesting. Of the combined 1,100,000 shares available for issuance under the two plans, at December 31, 2001, 2000, and 1999, there were 116,000; 587,000; and 647,000; respectively, in un-optioned shares available for future grants. A summary of stock option transactions for the years ended December 31, 2000, 1999, and 1998, is as follows:
2002 2001 2000 1999 ---------------------- ---------------------- ---------------------- Weighted Weighted Weighted Average Average Average Option Exercise Option Exercise Option Exercise Shares Price Shares Price Shares Price --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- ----------------------------- ------------------ ----------------- WEIGHTED WEIGHTED WEIGHTED AVERAGE AVERAGE AVERAGE OPTION EXERCISE OPTION EXERCISE OPTION EXERCISE SHARES PRICE SHARES PRICE SHARES PRICE -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- Outstanding at January 311 846,000 $1.128 458,000 $ 0.814$0.814 453,000 $ 0.779 543,000 0.758$0.779 Granted 10,000 2.720 477,000 1.361 60,000 0.958 10,000 0.690 Forfeited or expired - - (6,000) 0.751 -- -- (100,000) 0.656- - Exchanged -- -- -- -- -- --- - - - - - Exercised (108,800) 0.810 (83,000) 0.761 (55,000) 0.676 -- -- --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- ----------------- -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- Outstanding at December 31 747,200 $1.196 846,000 $ 1.128$1.128 458,000 $ 0.814 453,000 $ 0.779 ========= ========= ========= ========= ========= =========$0.814 ======== ======== ======== ======== ======== ======== Exercisable at end of year 747,200 $1.196 844,000 $ 1.123$1.123 358,000 $ 0.820 318,000 $ 0.813 ========= ========= ========= ========= ========= =========$0.820 ======== ======== ======== ======== ======== ======== Weighted-average fair value of Options granted during year $ 0.81 $ 0.61 $ 0.45 ========= ========= ========= The following table summarizes outstanding options into groups based upon exercise price ranges at December 31, 2001: Options Outstanding Options Exercisable ---------------------------------- ---------------------------------- Weighted Weighted Weighted Weighted Average Average Average Average Option Exercise Maturity Option xercise Maturity Exercise Price Range Shares Price (Years) Shares Price (Years) -------------------- --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- ---------$1.54 $0.81 $0.61 ======== ======== ========
The following table summarizes outstanding options into groups based upon exercise price ranges at December 31, 2002:
OPTIONS OUTSTANDING OPTIONS EXERCISABLE WEIGHTED WEIGHTED WEIGHTED WEIGHTED AVERAGE AVERAGE AVERAGE AVERAGE OPTION EXERCISE MATURITY OPTION EXERCISE MATURITY EXERCISE PRICE RANGE SHARES PRICE (YEARS) SHARES PRICE (YEARS) - --------------------- ------- -------- -------- ------- -------- -------- $0.75 or Less 42,000 $ 0.584 6.29 42,000 $ 0.584 6.2932,000 $0.610 5.35 32,000 $0.610 5.35 More than $0.75 and Less Than $1.00 315,000 0.832 4.54 315,000 0.832 4.54221,500 0.841 3.86 221,500 0.841 3.86 More than $1.00 489,000 1.365 9.67 487,000 1.358 9.69 --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- 846,000 $ 1.128 7.59 844,000 $ 1.123 7.60 ========= ========= ========= ========= ========= =========493,700 1.393 8.36 493,700 1.393 8.36 ------- -------- -------- ------- -------- -------- 747,200 $1.196 6.90 747,200 $1.196 6.90 ======= ======== ======== ======= ======== ========
Pro forma information regarding net income and earnings per share is required by SFAS No. 123, and has been determined as if the Company had accounted for its stock options under the fair value method. The fair value for these options was estimated at the date of grant using the Black Scholes option pricing model with the following weighted-average assumptions: risk-free interest rates of 3.50% in 2001; 5.75% in 2000; and 5.88% in 1999; dividend yields of 0% for all years; 35
volatility factors of .780 for 2001, .821 for 2000, and .851 for 1999; and an expected life of the valued options of 5 years for all years other than some exchanged options reissued in 1997 which had an expected remaining life of 4 years. Option valuation models require the input of highly subjective assumptions, including the expected stock price volatility, and changes in these input assumptions can materially affect the fair value estimate they produce. Because of this, it is management's opinion that existing models do not necessarily provide a reliable single measure of fair value for the Company's stock options. For pro forma disclosures, the estimated fair values determined by the model are being amortized to expense on a straight-line basis over the options vesting period as adjusted for estimated forfeitures. The Company's pro forma information follows: 2001 2000 1999 ----------- ----------- ----------- Pro forma net income $ 1,977,894 $ 1,419,693 $ 277,780 Pro forma net income per common share $ 0.20 $ 0.14 $ 0.03 Pro forma net income per common share--Assuming Dilution $ 0.19 $ 0.14 $ 0.03
Warrants - -------- In connection with the issuance of a Subordinated Debenture in 1997, which has since then been satisfied in its entirety, the Company issued warrants to acquire up to 100,000 shares of Common Stock at $.54 per share to certain unrelated individuals. The warrants may be exercised at anytime until expiration on November 21, 2002.WARRANTS Warrants to acquire up to 200,000 shares of common stock at approximately $0.44 per share were issued in conjunction with a consulting agreement to an unrelated individual in August 1998. The warrants may be exercised at anytimeany time until expiration on August 3, 2003. Notes Receivable Secured by Common Stock - ----------------------------------------NOTES RECEIVABLE SECURED BY COMMON STOCK During 1996, the Company purchased certain notes from a financial institution that are collateralized by the Company's common stock. These notes relate to shares issued under the Company's 1993 Non-Qualified Incentive Stock Option Plan. These notes, as renewed in 2000, are due from certain individuals including officers and other members of management, require monthly payments, and have maturity dates of December 31, 2002. 12.2004. 35 11. BUSINESS ACQUISITIONS During 2002, the Company acquired certain assets of the following entities for a total purchase price of $435,747:
ENTITY LOCATION DATE OF ACQUISITION - ----------------------- ----------------------- ------------------- Oklahoma Leather Supply Oklahoma City, Oklahoma January 2002 Heritage Leather Boise, Idaho March 2002 The Leather Shop Memphis, Tennessee October 2002 Copper Saguaro Tempe, Arizona November 2002
All of the acquired entities were formerly operated as independent retail leathercraft stores. The assets purchased in these acquisitions consisted primarily of inventory, store furniture and fixtures, and equipment. Goodwill recognized in these transactions amounted to $158,878, and is reported in the Tandy Leather Company segment. The Company also entered into non-compete agreements with the former owners totaling $52,000 for periods ranging from three to five years. In November 2000, the Company acquired the assets, primarily accounts receivable, inventory, fixtures, and equipment, of TLC Direct, Inc. and Tandy Leather Dealer, Inc. (dba Tandy Leather Company), a distributor of leather and related products located in Fort Worth, Texas. Additionally, the Company acquired the exclusive right to certain trademarks associated with the Tandy Leather business. The total purchase price for the operating and intangible assets was approximately $3.3 million, subject to adjustment. The purchase price was paid in the form of cash, funded with proceeds from the Company's revolving credit facility (see note 5)Note 4), and the assumption of certain liabilities. The transaction was accounted for under the purchase method of accounting and the purchase price was allocated to the net assets acquired based on their estimated fair values. The excess of cost over the fair value of net assets acquired, before adjustment, totaled approximately $410,000 and was recorded as goodwill as of the acquisition date. The purchase price adjustment, as defined in the Asset Purchase Agreement between the buyer and seller, was computed at approximately $200,000 and subsequently reduced the goodwill amount previously recorded. The operations of the acquired business have been included in the company'sCompany's financial statements beginning December 1, 2000. The following pro forma information (unaudited) has been prepared as if the acquisition of Tandy Leather had occurred at the beginning of each of the years ended December 31, 2000 and 1999.2000. Such information is not necessarily reflective of the actual results that would have occurred had the acquisition occurred on those dates. 36 that date.
2000 1999 ---- --------------- Net Sales $36,708,000 $43,996,000 Net Income (loss) $ 1,637,000 $(4,327,000)$1,637,000 Net Income (loss) per common share $ 0.17 $ (0.44)$0.17 Net Income (loss per common share - assuming dilution $ 0.16 $ (0.44) 13. SEGMENT INFORMATION SFAS No. 131, "Disclosures about Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information", establishes standards for public companies relating to the reporting of financial and descriptive information about their operating segments in financial statements. Operating segments are components of an enterprise about which separate financial information is available that is evaluated regularly by chief operating decision makers in deciding how to allocate resources and in accessing performance. The Company identifies its segments based on the activities of three distinct businesses: The Leather Factory, which sells product to both wholesale and retail customers, consists of a chain of sales/distribution units located in the United States and Canada; Tandy Leather Company, which sells product throughout the United States via the Internet and mail-order, and internationally through authorized dealers;$0.16
36 12. SEGMENT INFORMATION The Company identifies its segments based on the activities of three distinct businesses: The Leather Factory, which sells primarily to wholesale customers and consists of a chain of stores located in the United States and Canada; Tandy Leather Company, which sells primarily to retail customers and consists of a chain of stores located in the United States; and Roberts, Cushman & Company, which manufactures decorative hat trims sold directly to hat manufactures and distributors. The Company previously defined its operations as consisting of a single reporting segment as provided for under the aggregation criteria of SFAS No. 131. During 2000, the Company revised its presentation of segment information to reflect the Company initiative to establish strategic business units. The Company's reportable operating segments have been determined as separately identifiable business units. The Company measures segment earnings as operating earnings, defined as income before interest and income taxes. The "Tandy Leather Company" column for the year ended December 31, 2000 contains operating results beginning after its November 30, 2000 acquisition. The Leather Tandy Leather Roberts, Cushman Factory Company & Co Total
LEATHER TANDY FACTORY LEATHER ROBERTS, CUSHMAN TOTAL ------------ ------------ ----------------------- ---------------- ------------ For the year ended December 31, 2002 Net Sales $30,313,478 $7,387,874 $2,027,263 $39,728,615 Gross Profit 16,237,143 4,395,383 702,175 21,334,701 Operating earnings 3,742,844 371,372 17,558 4,131,774 Interest expense (246,316) (562) - (246,878) Other, net (64,071) (968) - (65,039) ----------- Income before income taxes and cumulative effect of change in accounting principle 3,432,457 369,842 17,558 3,819,857 ----------- Depreciation and amortization 367,218 111,013 13,081 491,312 Fixed asset additions 888,491 180,522 4,502 1,073,515 Total assets $16,205,347 $2,562,737 $907,518 $19,675,602 ------------ ----------- ---------------- ------------ For the year ended December 31, 2001 Net Sales $ 28,711,006 $ 6,606,090 $ 1,962,166 $ 37,279,262$28,711,006 $6,606,090 $1,962,166 $37,279,262 Gross Profit 15,074,323 3,708,691 561,313 19,344,327 Operating earnings 3,719,517 281,998 (99,547) 3,901,968 Interest expense (457,549) (1,009) --- (458,558) Other, net (74,799) (125) --(125 - (74,924) ----------------------- Income before income taxes 3,187,169 280,864 (99,547) 3.368,486 ------------3,368,486 ----------- Depreciation and amortization 474,114 103,118 152,921 730,153 Fixed Asset Additionsasset additions 454,809 172,434 2,530 629,773 Total assets $ 12,322,754 $ 2,333,639 $ 4,891,930 $ 19,548,323$12,322,754 $2,333,639 $4,891,930 $19,548,323 ------------ ------------ ----------------------- ---------------- ------------ For the year ended December 31, 2000 Net Sales $ 27,060,406 $ 575,635 $ 2,459,223 $ 30,095,264$27,060,406 $575,635 $2,459,223 $30,095,264 Gross Profit 13,735,454 252,453 959,810 14,947,717 Operating earnings (loss) 2,991,804 (43,724) 297,004 3,245,084 Interest expense (617,400) -- --(617,400 - - (617,400) Other, net (36,280) --- (99) (36,379) ----------------------- Income (loss) before income taxes 2,338,124 (43,724) 296,905 2,591,305 ----------------------- Depreciation and amortization 423,313 4,895 154,570 582,778 Fixed Asset Additionsasset additions 332,319 37,477 8,044 377,840 Total assets $ 10,783,149 $ 3,688,976 $ 5,213,954 $ 19,686,079$10,783,149 $3,688,976 $5,213,954 $19,686,079 ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ For the year ended December 31, 1999 Net Sales $ 24,735,228 -- $ 2,429,171 $ 27,164,399 Gross Profit 11,449,475 -- 807,156 12,256,631 Operating earnings (loss) 1,924,631 -- (14,420) 1,910,211 Interest expense (923,092) -- -- (923,092) Other, net 23,093 -- (305) 22,788 ------------ Income (loss) before income taxes 1,024,632 -- (14,725) 1,009,907 ------------ Depreciation and amortization 411,995 -- 155,457 567,452 Fixed Asset Additions 248,264 -- 6,010 254,274 Total assets $ 12,707,527 -- $ 5,513,248 $ 18,220,775 ------------ ------------ ----------------------- ---------------- ------------
37 Net sales for geographic areas was as follows: - -----------------------------------------------------
2002 2001 2000 1999 ----------- ----------- ----------- United States $35,193,935 $28,964,542 $25,847,946 All other countries 2,085,327 1,130,722 1,316,453 ----------- ----------- ----------- United States $37,510,567 $35,193,935 $28,964,542 All other countries 2,218,048 2,085,327 1,130,722 ----------- ----------- ----------- $39,728,615 $37,279,262 $30,095,264 $27,164,399 =========== =========== ===========
Geographic sales information is based on the location of the customer. Net sales from no single foreign country was material to the Company's consolidated net sales for the years ended December 31, 2002, 2001, and 2000. The Company does not have any significant long-lived assets outside of the United States. 37 13. GOODWILL AND OTHER INTANGIBLES As discussed in Note 2, in January 2002, the Company adopted SFAS 142, which requires companies to stop amortizing goodwill and certain intangible assets with indefinite lives. Instead, it requires that goodwill and intangible assets deemed to have indefinite useful lives be reviewed for impairment upon adoption (January 1, 2002) and annually thereafter. Under SFAS 142, goodwill impairment is deemed to exist if the net book value of a reporting unit exceeds its estimated fair value. The Company's reporting units are generally the individual stores, which are combined into the applicable operating segments identified in Note 12 - Segment Information. The new methodology in SFAS 142 differs from the Company's prior policy, which was permitted under earlier accounting standards, of using undiscounted cash flows of the acquired asset to determine if goodwill is recoverable. Upon adoption of SFAS 142 in the first quarter of 2002, the Company recorded a one-time, non-cash charge of approximately $4.0 million to reduce the carrying value of its goodwill. This charge in non-operational in nature and is reflected as a cumulative effect of an accounting change in the accompanying consolidated statement of income. The SFAS 142 goodwill impairment is associated solely with goodwill resulting from the acquisition of Roberts, Cushman & Co., Inc. ("Cushman") in 1995. The current fair value of Cushman and its assets was estimated by an independent third party using projected discounted future operating cash flows. The amount of the impairment primarily reflects the decline in Cushman's sales since the acquisition occurred. A summary of changes in the Company's goodwill for the year ended December 31, 2002 is as follows:
JANUARY 1, ACQUISITIONS & DECEMBER 31, 2002 ADJUSTMENTS IMPAIRMENTS 2002 ---------- ----------------- ------------- -------------- Leather Factory $ 332,630 $ 1,025 - $333,655 Tandy Leather 193,951 158,878 - $352,829 Roberts, Cushman 4,008,831 - $(4,008,831) - ---------- ----------------- ------------- -------------- Total $4,535,412 $159,903 $(4,008,831) $686,484 ========== ================= ============= ==============
As of December 31, 2002 and 2001, the Company's intangible assts and related accumulated amortization consisted of the following:
AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2002 -------------------------------------------------------------- GROSS ACCUMULATED AMORTIZATION NET ------------------------- ------------------------- -------- Trademarks, Copyrights $ 544,369 $ 102,029 $442,340 Non-Compete Agreements 52,000 10,833 41,167 ------------------------- ------------------------- -------- $ 596,369 $ 112,862 $483,507 ========================= ========================= ======== AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2001 -------------------------------------------------------------- GROSS ACCUMULATED AMORTIZATION NET ------------------------- ------------------------- -------- Trademarks, Copyrights $ 542,744 $ 65,836 $476,908 ========================= ========================= ========
The Company has no intangible assets not subject to amortization under SFAS 142. Amortization of intangible assets, excluding goodwill, of $48,283 in 2002, $40,443 in 2001, $11,278 in 2000 was recorded in operating expenses. Based on the current amount of intangible assets subject to amortization, the estimated amortization expense for each of the succeeding 5 years are as follows:
LEATHER FACTORY TANDY LEATHER TOTAL ---------------- -------------- ------- 2003 $5,918 $42,337 $48,255 2004 5,918 42,337 48,255 2005 5,918 32,337 38,255 2006 5,918 31,670 37,588 2007 5,918 31,670 37,588
During 2002, the Company acquired the following intangible assets:
AMORTIZATION PERIOD ------------------- Non-Compete Agreements $52,000 3 - 5 years Copyright 1,625 15 years
The 2001 and 1999.2000 results on a historical basis do not reflect the provision of SFAS 142. Had the Company adopted SFAS 142 on January 1, 2000, the historical net income and basic and diluted net income per common share (without giving effect to the charge relating to the reduction of goodwill) would have been changed to the adjusted amounts indicated below:
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2001 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- NET INCOME EARNINGS PER SHARE - BASIC EARNINGS PER SHARE - DILUTED ----------------------------- ----------------------------- ----------------------------- Reported net income $2,006,433 $0.20 $0.19 Addback goodwill amortization 223,894 0.02 0.02 ----------------------------- ----------------------------- ----------------------------- Adjusted net income $2,230,327 $0.22 $0.21 ============================= ============================= ============================= YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2000 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- NET INCOME EARNINGS PER SHARE - BASIC EARNINGS PER SHARE - DILUTED ----------------------------- ----------------------------- ----------------------------- Reported net income $1,541,320 $0.16 $0.15 Addback goodwill amortization 208,411 0.02 0.02 ----------------------------- ----------------------------- ----------------------------- Adjusted net income $1,749,731 $0.18 $0.17 ============================= ============================= =============================
38 14. RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS In JuneAugust 2001, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued SFASStatement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 141, Business Combinations143, Accounting for Asset Retirement Obligations ("SFAS 141"143"), which addresses financial accounting and reporting for obligations associated with the retirement of tangible long-lived assets and the associated asset retirement costs and applies to all entities. It applies to legal obligations associated with the retirement of long-lived assets that result from the acquisition, construction, development and/or the normal operation of a long-lived asset, except for certain obligations of lessees. SFAS No. 142, Goodwill and Other intangible Assets ("SFAS 142"). SFAS 141143 requires that the purchase methodfair value of accountinga liability for an asset retirement obligation be usedrecognized in the period in which it is incurred if a reasonable estimate of fair value can be made. The associated asset retirement costs are capitalized as part of the carrying amount of the long-lived asset. SFAS 143 is effective for all business combinations initiatedfinancial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after June 30, 2001.15, 2002. The Company will adopt SFAS 141 also specifies143 in January 2003 and believes that the criteria intangible assets acquired in a purchase method business combination must meet to be reported and recognized apart from goodwill. The adoption of SFAS 141 had no impact on the Company's consolidated financial statements. SFAS 142 changes the accounting for goodwill and other intangible assets subsequent to their initial recognition. Under SFAS 142, goodwill and intangible assets other than goodwill with indefinite lives are no longer amortized, rather they143 will be subject tonot have a periodic impairment test based on their fair value. Intangible assets with lives restricted by contractual, legal, or other means will continue to be amortized over their useful lives. Amortization of goodwill and other intangible assets with indefinite lives will cease January 1, 2002, the date the Company is required to adopt this standard. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of adopting this new standard and currently cannot estimate thematerial effect on the Company's consolidatedresults of operations or financial statements beyond discontinuing amortization. Inposition. Also in August 2001, the FASB issued SFASStatement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 144, Accounting for the Impairment ofor Disposal of Long-Lived Assets ("SFAS 144"), which addresses financial accounting and reporting for the impairment or disposal of long-lived assets and discontinued operations.assets. SFAS 144 requires thatestablishes a single accounting model, based on the framework established in Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 121, Accounting for the Impairment of Long-Lived Assets and for Long-Lived Assets to be Disposed Of ("SFAS 121"), for long-lived assets to be disposed of be measured atby sale. SFAS 121 did not address the loweraccounting for a segment of carrying amount or fair value less costa business accounted for as a discontinued operation under APB Opinion No. 30, Reporting the Results of Operations- Reporting the Effects of Disposal of a Segment of a Business, and Extraordinary, Unusual and Infrequently Occurring Events and Transactions ("APB 30") so two accounting models existed for the disposal of long-lived assets. SFAS 144 replaces both SFAS 121 and APB 30, so that only one accounting model exists for the disposal of long-lived assets. SFAS 144 also resolves implementation issues related to sell, whether reported in continuing operations or discontinued operations.SFAS 121. The Company will adopt the provisionprovisions of SFAS 144 are effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2001 and are applied prospectively. The adoption of SFAS 144 on January 1, 2002 applied prospectively. Adoption of this new standard is not expected to have ahad no material effect on the Company's consolidatedresults of operations or financial position. In April 2002, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 145, Rescission of FASB Statements No. 4, 44 and 64, Amendment of FASB Statement No. 13, and Technical Corrections. This statement provides guidance on the classification of gains and losses from the extinguishment of debt and on the accounting for certain specified lease transactions. The adoption of this statement did not have a material impact on the Company's results of operations or financial position. In July 2002, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 146, Accounting for Costs Associated with Exit or Disposal Activities (SFAS No. 146). SFAS 146 nullifies FASB Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF) Issue No. 94-3, "Liability Recognition for Certain Employee Termination Benefits and Other Costs to Exit an Activity (including Certain Costs Incurred in a Restructuring)". It requires that a liability be recognized for those costs only when the liability is incurred, that is, when it meets the definition of a liability in the FASB's conceptual framework. SFAS No. 146 also establishes fair value as the objective for initial measurement of liabilities related to exit or disposal activities. SFAS 146 is effective for exit or disposal activities that are initiated after December 31, 2002, with earlier adoption encouraged. The Company does not expect that the adoption of SFAS 146 will have a material impact on its results from operations or financial position. In December 2002, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards 148, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation - Transition and Disclosure - an amendment of FASB Statement 123 ("SFAS 148"). SFAS 148 amends SFAS 123 to provide alternative transition methods for an entity's voluntary change in its accounting for stock-based compensation from the intrinsic method to the fair value method under SFAS 123. In addition, SFAS 148 amends the disclosure requirements of SFAS 123 to require prominent disclosures in both annual and interim financial statements about the method of accounting used for stock-based employee compensation and the effect of the method used on reported results. The Company currently plans to continue to account for its stock-based compensation using the intrinsic value method as prescribed by APB No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees and will comply with the new disclosure requirements beginning with these financial statements. 39 15. FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS Cash, accounts receivable-trade and accounts payable - ----------------------------------------------------CASH, ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE-TRADE AND ACCOUNTS PAYABLE The carrying amount approximates fair value because of the short maturity of those instruments. Notes payable and long-term debt - --------------------------------NOTES PAYABLE AND LONG-TERM DEBT The interest rates on the Company's notes payable and long-term debt fluctuate with changes in the prime rate and are the rates currently available to the Company; therefore, the carrying amount of those instruments approximates their fair value. 38
16. QUARTERLY FINANCIAL DATA (UNAUDITED) First Second Third Fourth 2001 Quarter Quarter Quarter Quarter
FIRST SECOND THIRD FOURTH 2002 QUARTER QUARTER QUARTER QUARTER - -------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ----------- ----------- ---------- ---------- Net sales $ 9,372,613 $ 9,359,893 $ 9,198,401 $ 9,348,355$10,203,951 $10,052,036 $9,484,730 $9,987,898 Gross profit 4,884,216 4,978,795 4,611,574 4,869,742 Net income 497,283 621,910 396,529 490,711 Net income5,368,595 5,435,626 5,088,398 5,442,082 Income before cumulative effect of change in accounting principle 759,305 792,047 534,092 509,545 Income before cumulative effect of change in accounting principle per common share: Basic 0.08 0.08 0.05 0.06 0.04 0.05 Diluted 0.07 0.07 0.05 0.06 0.04 0.05 Weighted average number of common shares outstanding: Basic 9,949,494 9,971,952 9,991,052 9,991,16110,001,717 10,041,018 10,064,249 10,145,749 Diluted 10,204,608 10,329,817 10,656,859 10,656,968 First Second Third Fourth 2000 Quarter Quarter Quarter Quarter10,731,712 10,799,630 10,723,403 10,791,694 FIRST SECOND THIRD FOURTH 2001 QUARTER QUARTER QUARTER QUARTER - -------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ----------- ----------- ---------- ---------- Net sales $ 7,405,557 $ 7,602,405 $ 7,374,556 $ 7,712,746$9,372,613 $9,359,893 $9,198,401 $9,348,355 Gross profit 3,570,591 3,801,033 3,713,560 3,862,5334,884,216 4,978,795 4,611,574 4,869,742 Net income 383,942 493,394 315,099 348,885497,283 621,910 396,529 490,711 Net income per common share: Basic 0.05 0.06 0.04 0.05 0.03Diluted 0.05 0.06 0.04 Diluted 0.04 0.05 0.03 0.03 Weighted average number of common shares outstanding: Basic 9,859,754 9,873,161 9,876,422 9,887,5099,949,494 9,971,952 9,991,052 9,991,161 Diluted 10,121,206 10,187,427 10,199,164 10,217,41810,204,608 10,329,817 10,656,859 10,656,968
3940 ******************************************************************************* THE LEATHER FACTORY, INC. SCHEDULE II - ALLOWANCE FOR DOUBTFUL ACCOUNTS YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2002, 2001, and 2000 and 1999 2001 2000 1999 --------- --------- --------- Balance at beginning of year $ 338,000 $ 177,000 $ 52,000 Reserve "purchased" during year (Tandy) -- 248,000 -- Additions charged to income 17,000 22,000 157,000 Balances written off, net of recoveries (164,000) (109,000) (32,000) --------- --------- --------- Balance at end of year $ 191,000 $ 338,000 $ 177,000 ========= ========= ========= 40
2002 2001 2000 --------- ---------- ---------- BALANCE AT BEGINNING OF YEAR $191,000 $338,000 $177,000 Reserve "purchased" during year (Tandy) - - 248,000 Additions charged to income (39,000) 17,000 22,000 Balances written off, net of recoveries (74,000) (164,000) (109,000) --------- ---------- ---------- Balance at end of year $78,000 $191,000 $338,000 ========= ========== ==========
41 REPORT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS The Board of Directors The Leather Factory, Inc. We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of The Leather Factory, Inc. as of December 31, 20012002 and 2000,2001, and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders' equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2001.2002. Our audits also included the financial statement schedule referred to in the index at Item 14(a). These financial statements and schedule are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and schedule based on our audits. We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States.States of America. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion. In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of The Leather Factory, Inc. at December 31, 20012002 and 2000,2001, and the consolidated results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2001,2002, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States.States of America. Also, in our opinion, the related financial statement schedule, when considered in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly in all material respects the information set forth therein. As discussed in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets, effective January 1, 2002. Hein + Associates LLP Dallas, Texas February 4, 2002 416, 2003 42 PART III ItemITEM 10. Directors and Executive Officers of the Registrant.DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT. Information required by this item with regard to executive officers in included in Part I, Item 1 of this report under the heading "Executive Officers of the Registrant", which information is incorporated herein by reference. Information required by this item regarding the Directors of the Company and compliance with Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is set forth in the Company's Proxy StatementsStatement for its 20022003 Annual Meeting of Stockholders (the "Proxy Statement") under the heading "Election of Directors", which information is incorporated herein by reference. This Proxy Statement will be filed with the Commission pursuant to Regulation 14A within 120 days of the year ended December 31, 2001. Item2002. ITEM 11. Executive Compensation.EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION. Information concerning executive compensation is set forth in the Proxy Statement under the heading "Executive Compensation", which is incorporated herein by reference. This Proxy Statement will be filed with the Commission pursuant to Regulation 14A within 120 days of the year ended December 31, 2001. Item2002. ITEM 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management.SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS. Information concerning security ownership of certain beneficial owners and management and securities authorized for issuance under equity compensation plans is set forth in the Proxy Statement under the heading "Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management", which is incorporated herein by reference. This Proxy Statement will be filed with the Commission pursuant to Regulation 14A within 120 days of the year ended December 31, 2001. Item2002. ITEM 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions.CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS. Information concerning certain relationships and related transactions is set forth in the Proxy Statement under the heading "Certain Transactions", which is incorporated herein by reference. This Proxy Statement will be filed with the Commission pursuant to Regulation 14A within 120 days of the year ended December 31, 2001.2002. ITEM 14. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES. (a) As of a date within ninety (90) days of the date of this report (the "Evaluation Date"), our President, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures pursuant to Rule 13a-14 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act"). Based upon this evaluation, they have concluded that, subject to the limitations on the effectiveness of the controls described below, the Company's disclosure controls and procedures are sufficiently effective to ensure that the information required to be disclosed by the Company in the reports it files under the Exchange Act is gathered, analyzed and disclosed with adequate timeliness, accuracy and completeness. (b) There have been no significant changes in the Company's internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect these controls subsequent to the date of the evaluation referred to above. No significant deficiencies or material weaknesses in the Company's internal controls were observed. Accordingly, no corrective actions were undertaken. Limitations on the Effectiveness of Controls. Our management, including the President, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, does not expect that the Company's disclosure controls and procedures or the Company's internal controls will prevent all error and all fraud. A control system, no matter how well conceived and operated, is based in part upon certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events and can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control system are met. Further, the design of a control system must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints, and the benefits of controls must be considered relative to their costs. Because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within the Company have been or will be detected. 43 PART IV Item 14. Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules and Reports on FormITEM 15. EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K. (a) 1. Financial statements and financial statement schedules --------------------------------------------------------- TheSee Item 8 for an index to the consolidated financial statements and schedule listed in the accompanying index to consolidatedsupplementary financial statements at Item 8 are filed as part of this Report.information. 2. Exhibits ----------- The exhibits listed on the accompanying Exhibit Index, which immediately precedes such exhibits, are filed or incorporated by reference as part of this Report and such Exhibit Index. (b) Reports on Form 8-K ------------------- On December 20, 2001, the Company filed a Current Report on Form 8-K (Items 5 and 9), dated December 20, 2001. This report described plans to expand the Tandy Leather operations through retail stores. A related press release was included. 42None 44 SIGNATURES Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Company caused this Report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized. THE LEATHER FACTORY, INC. (Registrant) Date: March 20, 2002 By: /s/ Wray Thompson -------------- ----------------- Wray Thompson Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer Date: March 20, 2002------------------- WRAY THOMPSON CHAIRMAN OF THE BOARD AND CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER By: /s/ Shannon L. Greene --------------- --------------------------------------------- SHANNON L. GREENE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER AND TREASURER Dated: March 27, 2003 POWER OF ATTORNEY By signing this Form 10-K below, I hereby appoint each of Wray Thompson and Shannon L. Greene Chief Financial Officeras my attorney-in-fact to sign all amendments to this Form 10-K on my behalf, and Treasurerto file this Form 10-K (including all exhibits and other documents related to the Form 10-K) with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission. I authorize each of my attorneys-in-fact to (1) appoint a substitute attorney-in-fact for himself and (2) perform any actions that he believes are necessary or appropriate to carry out the intention and purpose of this Power of Attorney. I ratify and confirm all lawful actions taken directly or indirectly by my attorneys-in-fact and by any properly appointed substitute attorneys-in-fact. In accordance with the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this Report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Company and in the capacities and on the dates indicated. Signature & Title DateSIGNATURE TITLE DATE - -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- /s/ Wray Thompson March 20, 2002 - ------------------------------ Wray Thompson Chairman of the Board, - ------------------------ Chief Executive Officer and Director March 27, 2003 WRAY THOMPSON /s/ Shannon L. Greene Chief Financial Officer, - ------------------------ Treasurer and Director March 27, 2003 SHANNON L. GREENE /s/ Joseph R. Mannes Director March 27, 2003 - ------------------------ JOSEPH R. MANNES /s/ H.W. Markwardt Director March 27, 2003 - ------------------------ H.W. MARKWARDT /s/ Michael A. Markwardt Director March 27, 2003 - ------------------------ MICHAEL A. MARKWARDT /s/ Ronald C. Morgan President and Director March 20, 200227, 2003 - ------------------------------ Ronald------------------------ RONALD C. Morgan, DirectorMORGAN /s/ Robin L. Morgan Vice President, Assistant Secretary - ------------------------ and Director March 20, 200227, 2003 ROBIN L. MORGAN /s/ Anthony C. Morton Director March 27, 2003 - ------------------------------ Robin L. Morgan, Director------------------------ ANTHONY C. MORTON /s/ William M. Warren Secretary and Director March 20, 200227, 2003 - ------------------------------ William------------------------ WILLIAM M. Warren, DirectorWARREN 45 CERTIFICATIONS I, WRAY THOMPSON, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of The Leather Factory, Inc.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report; 4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rule 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have: a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared; b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this annual report (the "Evaluation Date"); and c) presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date; 5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function): a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and 6. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this annual report whether there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses. Date: March 27, 2003 /s/ H. W. MarkwardtWray Thompson ------------------- Wray Thompson President and Chief Executive Officer (principal executive officer) ******** 46 I, SHANNON L. GREENE, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of The Leather Factory, Inc.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report; 4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rule 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have: a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared; b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this annual report (the "Evaluation Date"); and c) presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date; 5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function): a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and 6. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this annual report whether there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses. Date: March 20, 2002 - ------------------------------ H. W. Markwardt, Director /s/ Joseph R. Mannes March 20, 2002 - ------------------------------ Joseph R. Mannes, Director /s/ Anthony C. Morton March 20, 2002 - ------------------------------ Anthony C. Morton, Director27, 2003 /s/ Shannon L. Greene March 20, 2002 - ------------------------------------------------------- Shannon L. Greene Director /s/ Michael A. Markwardt March 20, 2002 - ------------------------------ Michael A. Markwardt, Director 43Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer (principal financial and accounting officer) 47 THE LEATHER FACTORY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES EXHIBIT INDEX Exhibit Number Description ------ -----------EXHIBIT NUMBER DESCRIPTION - ------- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- 3.1 Certificate of Incorporation of The Leather Factory, Inc., filed as Exhibit 3.1 to the Registration Statement on Form SB-2 of The Leather Factory, Inc. (Commission File No. 33-81132) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on July 5, 1994, and incorporated by reference herein. 3.2 Bylaws of The Leather Factory, Inc., filed as Exhibit 3.2 to the Registration Statement on Form SB-2 of The Leather Factory, Inc. (Commission File No. 33-81132) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on July 5, 1994, and incorporated by reference herein. 10.1 The Leather Factory, Inc. Stock Purchase Warrant for 200,000 shares common stock, $.0024 par value issued to Evert I. Schlinger dated August 3, 1998 and terminating on August 3, 2003, filed as Exhibit 4.13 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of The Leather Factory, Inc. (Commission File No. 1-12368) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission November 12, 1998, and incorporated by reference herein. 10.2 Credit and Security Agreement dated November 22, 1999, by and between The Leather Factory, Inc., a Delaware corporation, The Leather Factory, Inc., a Texas corporation, The Leather Factory, Inc., an Arizona corporation, Roberts, Cushman & Company, Inc., and Hi-Line Leather & Manufacturing and Wells Fargo Business Credit, Inc., filed as Exhibit 4.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K of The Leather Factory, Inc. (Commission File No. 1-12368) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on December 16, 1999, and incorporated by reference herein. 10.3 Revolving Note (Revolving Credit Loan) dated November 22, 1999, in the principal amount of $8,500,000,8,500,000, payable to the order of Wells Fargo Business Credit, Inc., which matures November 30, 2002, filed as Exhibit 4.2 to the Current Report on Form 8-K of The Leather Factory, Inc. (Commission File No. 1-12368) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on December 16, 1999, and incorporated by reference herein. 10.4 Term Note dated November 22, 1999, in the principal amount of $150,000, payable to the order of Wells Fargo Business Credit, Inc., which matures May 1, 2000, filed as Exhibit 4.3 to the Current Report on Form 8-K of The Leather Factory, Inc. (Commission File No. 1-12368) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on December 16, 1999, and incorporated by reference herein. 10.5 Copyright Security Agreement dated November 22, 1999, by and between The Leather Factory, Inc., a Delaware corporation, The Leather Factory, Inc., a Texas corporation, The Leather Factory, Inc., an Arizona corporation, Roberts, Cushman & Company, Inc., and Hi-Line Leather & Manufacturing and Wells Fargo Business Credit, Inc., filed as Exhibit 4.4 to the Current Report on Form 8-K of The Leather Factory, Inc. (Commission File No. 1-12368) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on December 16, 1999, and incorporated by reference herein. 44 10.6 First Amendment to Credit and Security Agreement dated November 30, 2000, by and between The Leather Factory, Inc. a Delaware corporation, The Leather Factory, Inc., a Texas corporation, The Leather Factory, Inc., an Arizona corporation, Roberts, Cushman & Company, Inc., Hi-Line Leather & Manufacturing, and Tandy Leather Company, Inc. (f/k/a Leather Tan Acquisition, Inc.) and Wells Fargo Business Credit, Inc. filed as Exhibit 99.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K of The Leather Factory, Inc. (Commission File No. 1-12368) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on December 15, 2000, and incorporated by reference herein. 10.7 Second Amendment to Credit and Security Agreement dated February 7, 2001, by and between The Leather Factory, Inc. a Delaware corporation, The Leather Factory, Inc., a Texas corporation, The Leather Factory, Inc., an Arizona corporation, Roberts, Cushman & Company, Inc., Hi-Line Leather & Manufacturing, and Tandy Leather Company, Inc. (f/k/a Leather Tan Acquisition, Inc.) and Wells Fargo Business Credit, Inc. filed an Exhibit 4.1 to the Form 10-Q filed by The Leather Factory, Inc. with the Securities and Exchange Commission on August 14, 2001, and incorporated by reference herein. 10.8 Third Amendment to Credit and Security Agreement and Waiver of Defaults dated June 14, 2001, by and between The Leather Factory, Inc. a Delaware corporation, The Leather Factory, Inc., a Texas corporation, The Leather Factory, Inc., an Arizona corporation, Roberts, Cushman & Company, Inc., Hi-Line Leather & Manufacturing, and Tandy Leather Company, Inc. (f/k/a Leather Tan Acquisition, Inc.) and Wells Fargo Business Credit, Inc. filed an Exhibit 4.2 to Form 10-Q filed by The Leather Factory, Inc. with the Securities and Exchange Commission onOn August 14, 2001, and incorporated by reference herein. 10.9 Letter Agreement for Consulting Services dated July 24, 1998, by and between The Leather Factory, Inc. and Evert I. Schlinger, filed as Exhibit 4.13 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of The Leather Factory, Inc. (Commission File No. 1-12368) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on November 12, 1998, and incorporated by reference herein. 10.10 Asset Purchase Agreement dated November 30, 2000, by Tandy Leather Company, Inc. (f/k/a Leather Tan Acquisition, Inc.), a Texas corporation, TLC Direct, Inc., a Texas corporation, and Tandy Leather Dealer, Inc., a Texas corporation, filed as Exhibit No. 2.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K of The Leather Factory, Inc. (Commission File No. 1-12368) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on December 15, 2000, and incorporated herein by reference. 10.11 Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated as of March 20, 2002, made by and among The Leather Factory, Inc., a Delaware corporation; Roberts, Cushman & Company, Inc., a New York corporation; The Leather Factory, Inc., a Nevada corporation; The Leather Factory of Nevada Investments Inc., a Nevada corporation; Tandy Leather Company, Inc., a Nevada corporation; Tandy Leather Company Investments, Inc., a Nevada corporation; The Leather Factory, L.P., a Texas limited partnership; Tandy Leather Company, L.P., a Texas limited partnership; Hi-Line Leather & Manufacturing Company, a California corporation; and The Leather Factory, Inc., an Arizona corporation, and Wells Fargo Bank Minnesota, National Association, filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K of The Leather Factory, Inc. (Commission File No. 1- 12368) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 20, 2002, and incorporated herein by reference. 10.12 Revolving Note, dated March 20, 2002, in the principal amount of up to $7,500,000.00 given by The Leather Factory, Inc., a Delaware corporation; Roberts, Cushman & Company, Inc., a New York corporation; The Leather Factory, Inc., a Nevada corporation; The Leather Factory of Nevada Investments Inc., a Nevada corporation; Tandy Leather Company, Inc., a Nevada corporation; Tandy Leather Company Investments, Inc., a Nevada corporation; The Leather Factory, L.P., a Texas limited partnership; Tandy Leather Company, L.P., a Texas limited partnership; Hi-Line Leather & Manufacturing Company, a California corporation; and The Leather Factory, Inc., an Arizona corporation, as borrowers, payable to the order of Wells Fargo Bank Minnesota, National Association, filed as Exhibit 10.2 to the Current Report on Form 8-K of The Leather Factory, Inc. (Commission File No. 1-12368) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 20, 2002, and incorporated herein by reference. 10.13 Collection Account Agreement, dated as of March 20, 2002, among The Leather Factory, Inc., a Delaware corporation; Roberts, Cushman & Company, Inc., a New York corporation; The Leather Factory, Inc., a Nevada corporation; The Leather Factory of Nevada Investments Inc., a Nevada corporation; Tandy Leather Company, Inc., a Nevada corporation; Tandy Leather Company Investments, Inc., a Nevada corporation; The Leather Factory, L.P., a Texas limited partnership; Tandy Leather Company, L.P., a Texas limited partnership; Hi-Line Leather & Manufacturing Company, a California corporation; and The Leather Factory, Inc., an Arizona corporation, and Wells Fargo Bank Minnesota, National Association, a national banking association and Wells Fargo Bank Texas, National Association, filed as Exhibit 10.3 to the Current Report on Form 8-K of The Leather Factory, Inc. (Commission File No. 1-12368) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 20, 2002, and incorporated herein by reference. 10.14 Amended and Restated Security Agreement, dated as of March 20, 2002, by and between The Leather Factory of Canada, Ltd., a Manitoba corporation, and Wells Fargo Bank Minnesota, National Association, filed as Exhibit 10.4 to the Current Report on Form 8-K of The Leather Factory, Inc. (Commission File No. 1-12368) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 20, 2002, and incorporated herein by reference. 10.15 Amended and Restated Guaranty (the Leather Factory of Canada, Ltd.), dated as of March 20, 2002, executed by The Leather Factory of Canada, Ltd., a Manitoba corporation, for the benefit of Wells Fargo Bank Minnesota, National Association, filed as Exhibit 10.5 to the Current Report on Form 8-K of The Leather Factory, Inc. (Commission File No. 1-12368) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 20, 2002, and incorporated herein by reference. *21.1 Subsidiaries of the Company. *23.1 Consent of Hein + Associates LLP dated March 19, 2002. ------------XX, 2003. *99.1 Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 ______________ *Filed herewith. 4548 EXHIBIT 21.1 LIST OF THE SUBSIDIARIES OF THE COMPANY - - The Leather Factory, Inc., a Nevada corporation - - The Leather Factory of Nevada Investments, Inc., a Nevada corporation - - The Leather Factory, LP, a Texas limited partnership - - The Leather Factory ,Inc., an Arizona corporation - - Hi-Line Leather & Manufacturing Company, a California corporation - - Roberts, Cushman & Company, Inc., a New York corporation - - The Leather Factory of Canada Ltd., a Manitoba domiciled Canadian corporation - - Tandy Leather Company, Inc., a Nevada corporation - - Tandy Leather Company Investments, Inc. a Nevada corporation - - Tandy Leather Company, LP, a Texas limited partnership 49 EXHIBIT 23.1 CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 33-81214) pertaining to the Employee Stock Ownership Plan and Trust of The Leather Factory, Inc. and the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-07147) pertaining to the 1995 Stock Option Plan of The Leather Factory, Inc. of our report dated February 6, 2003, with respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedule of The Leather Factory, Inc. included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2002. HEIN + ASSOCIATES LLP Dallas, Texas March 28, 2003 50 EXHIBIT 99.1 Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of The Leather Factory, Inc. for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2002 as filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Wray Thompson, as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, and Shannon L. Greene, as Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: i. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and ii. The information contained in the Report fully presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. March 27, 2003 By: /s/ WRAY THOMPSON ------------------- WRAY THOMPSON CHAIRMAN OF THE BOARD AND CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER March 27, 2003 By: /s/ SHANNON L. GREENE ------------------------ SHANNON L. GREENE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER AND TREASURER 51