Table of Contents

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

 

FORM 10-K

 

(Mark One)

[X]Annual Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of The Securities Exchange Act of 1934

 

For the Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 20152018

 

or

 

[  ]Transition Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of The Securities Exchange Act of 1934

 

For the transition period from _____ to _____

 

Commission File Number: 333-191175

 

PEERLOGIX, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

 

Nevada46-4824543
(State or other jurisdiction of(I.R.S. Employer
incorporation or organization)Identification No.)

 

119 West 24th Street, 4th Floor,480 Sixth Ave., #351, New York, New YorkNY 10011

(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)

 

Registrant's telephone number, including area code:(914) 550-9993

 

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

None

 

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:

None

 

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes [  ]   No [X]

 

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes [  ]   No [X]

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes [X]   No [  ]

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to RuleRue 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes [X] No [_]

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K [  ]☐   

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company,” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b–2 of the Exchange Act.

 

(Check one):

Large accelerated filer [  ]☐   Accelerated filer [  ]☐   
Non-accelerated filer [  ]Smaller reporting company [X]
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)Emerging growth company 

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 7(a)(2)(B) of the Securities Act. ☐   

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed a report on and attestation to its management’s assessment of the effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting under Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (15 U.S.C. 7262(b)) by the registered public accounting firm that prepared or issued its audit report. ☐

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes [  ]   No [X]

 

The aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common equity held by non-affiliates of the registrant based on the closing sales price, or the average bid and asked price on such stock, as June 30, 20152018 was $318,582$1,129,263.

 

The number of shares of the registrant’s common stock outstanding as of April 14, 2016December 15, 2020 was 23,345,035.67,744,953.

 

 

PEERLOGIX, INC.

 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

 

PART I  
Item 1.Business.41
Item 1A.Risk Factors.138
Item 1B.Unresolved Staff Comments.228
Item 2.Properties.228
Item 3.Legal Proceedings.228
Item 4.Mine Safety Disclosures.228
PART II  
Item 5.Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities.239
Item 6.Selected Financial Data.2511
Item 7.Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations. .2511
Item 7A.Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.3217
Item 8.Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.3217
Item 9.Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure.3217
Item 9A.Controls and Procedures.3317
Item 9B.Other Information.3419
PART III  
Item 10.Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance.3520
Item 11.Executive Compensation.3621
Item 12.Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters.3924
Item 13.Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence.3927
Item 14.Principal Accounting Fees and Services.4127
PART IV  
Item 15.Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules4328
   
SIGNATURES 45

 

 2i 

 

CAUTIONARY STATEMENT REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

 

The information contained in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for year ended December 31, 20152018 (the “Report”), including in documents that may be incorporated by reference into this Report, includes some statements that are not purely historical and that are “forward-looking statements.” Such forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, statements regarding the Company and its management’s expectations, hopes, beliefs, intentions or strategies regarding the future, including its financial condition and results of operations. In addition, any statements that refer to projections, forecasts or other characterizations of future events or circumstances, including any underlying assumptions, are forward-looking statements. The words “anticipates,” “believes,” “continue,” “could,” “estimates,” “expects,” “intends,” “may,” “might,” “plans,” “possible,” “potential,” “predicts,” “projects,” “seeks,” “should,” “will,” “would” and similar expressions, or the negatives of such terms, may identify forward-looking statements, but the absence of these words does not mean that a statement is not forward-looking.

 

The forward-looking statements contained in this Report are based on current expectations and beliefs concerning future developments. There can be no assurance that future developments actually affecting the Company will be those anticipated. These forward-looking statements involve a number of risks, uncertainties (some of which are beyond the Company’s control) or other assumptions that may cause actual results or performance to be materially different from those expressed or implied by these forward-looking statements, some of which are described in the section of this Report entitled “Risk Factors”.

 

Should one or more of these risks or uncertainties materialize, or should any of the Company’s assumptions prove incorrect, actual results may vary in material respects from those projected in these forward-looking statements. The Company undertakes no obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, except as may be required under applicable securities laws.

 

Unless specifically set forth to the contrary, when used in this Report the terms “PeerLogix,” "we"", "our", the "Company" and similar terms refer to PeerLogix, Inc., a Nevada corporation and where the context is applicable, to our business operations, inclusive of those undertaken by our operating subsidiary, PeerLogix Delaware. “PeerLogix Delaware” refers solely to our wholly-owned subsidiary, PeerLogix Technologies, Inc., a Delaware corporation.

 

 3ii 

 

PART I

Item 1. Business.

 

OVERVIEW

 

We arePeerLogix, Inc. is an advertising technology and data aggregation company providingcompany. The Company provides a proprietary software as a service (“SAAS”) platform which enables the tracking and cataloguing of Torrent files and Torrent networksover-the-top viewership in order to determine consumer trends and preferences based upon media consumption. We have recently developed and deployed a proprietary mobile and digital ad serving platform utilizing such data to provide highly targeted placement of digital advertisements. Our patent pendingIts platform collects Torrentover-the-top data, including IPInternet Protocol (IP) addresses of the uploadingstreaming and downloading parties (e.g., location)(location), the name, file type, media type (whether movie, television, documentary, music, e-books, software, etc.), and genre of media watched, listened or downloaded, and utilizes licensed and publicly available demographic and other databases to further filter the collected data to provide insights into consumer preferences to digital advertising firms, product and media companies, entertainment studios and others.

 

The Company was incorporated on February 14, 2014 in Nevada under the name of Realco International, Inc. The Company previously offered real estate marketing and sales services to individuals and businesses seeking to purchase international real estate, with a particular focus on the European and Middle Eastern markets.

 

On August 14, 2015,Effective May 1, 2018, the Company entered intoexecuted a share exchange transaction whereby allservices agreement with Oracle America, Inc., whereas, certain portions of the shareholdersCompany’s data assets and materials will be used for the purpose of PeerLogix Technologies, Inc., a privately held Delaware corporation (“PeerLogix Delaware”testing, analyzing, and evaluating their use with Oracle systems, services and product offers. The initial term of the agreement is 6-months.

On July 6, 2018, the Board of Directors of the Company, resolved to offer to the holders of warrants (the “Warrants”) of the Company (the “Holders”), exchanged alland approve the execution of, their sharesa warrant repricing and exercise agreement (the “Agreement”) with each of common stock for newly issued sharesthe consenting Holders, whereby the exercise price of the Warrants shall be reduced from $0.10 to $0.06 per share of common stock of the Company (the “Share Exchange”“Common Stock”). As a resultFurthermore, the Board of Directors resolved to offer to the Holders, as outlined in the Agreement, an additional Series B Warrant (the “Series B”) for every four (4) Warrants exercised pursuant to the Agreement. The Series B have an exercise price of $0.25 per share of the Share Exchange, PeerLogix Delaware has become a wholly-owned subsidiaryCommon Stock. A total of 11,274,500 warrants were exercised for gross proceeds of $676,470 and 2,818,625 Series B warrants were issued.

Effective August 16, 2018, the Company executed an additional services agreement with Oracle America, Inc., whereas, certain services including aggregation, analysis, segmentation, reporting, marketing, sales and distribution of data segments from the Company are licensed for use via Oracle’s proprietary electronic platform. Revenue payouts to the company are to occur within sixty (45) days after the end of each calendar month. The initial term of the Companyagreement is 1-year and its business operations are assumed byautomatically renews for successive 1-year terms unless either party provides written notice of intent to not renew at least ninety days prior to the Company. On September 3, 2015,end of a term. The agreement is active as of the Company filed a Certificatedate of Amendment to its Articles of Incorporation changing its name from Realco International, Inc. to PeerLogix, Inc. this report.

 

Industry Background

 

Brand advertisers and consumer product companies utilize a broad array of consumer data on which to base advertising decisions. They have traditionally relied upon information collected from legacy media distribution providers to base their research (e.g., Comcast and other cable providers). These traditional methods are inherently inefficient by today’s standards and are often cost-prohibitive due to their fragmented nature, relying upon separate, non-integrated legacy providers for television and music research related to consumer preferences.

 

Digital surveying methods provide a solution to many of the inefficiencies present with traditional methods. As a result,Thus, advertisers, agencies, entertainment studios and others are rapidly adopting digital methodologies to augment their traditional practices. One such digital surveying method yet to be widely implemented is TorrentOver-the-Top (“OTT”) measurement, which the Company believes is a significant market opportunity.

1

 

In today’s digital world, consumers have access to media, television shows, music, movies, video games and software through a number of growing and fragmented methods and providers. This change in behavior and habits is an evolution resulting from technological innovation, and has resulted in greater choice and democratization amongst consumers. The resulting digital empowerment has directly lead to the birth of platforms providing consumers direct access to media, which often times circumvents legacy providers previously relied upon for distribution (such as traditional cable providers).

 

One of the more prominent digital platforms to arise has been TorrentOver-the-Top (e.g., Popcorn Time, BitTorrent, Vuse)Netflix, Hulu, HBOGO). Torrent enables consumers to share TV shows, music, movies, video games and software directly with one another, rather than relying on a centralized sourceOver-the-Top broadcast is entertainment content (e.g., iTunes, Netflix)audio, video, and other media) transmitted via the Internet without an operator of multiple cable or direct-broadcast satellite television systems controlling or distributing the content (i.e., cable television service providers). Since TorrentConsumers can access Over-the-Top content through Internet-connected devices such as phones (including Android, iPhone, and Windows-type mobile devices), smart TVs (such as Google TV and LG Electronic's Channel Plus), set-top boxes (such as the Fire TV and Roku), gaming consoles (such as the PlayStation 4, Wii U, and Xbox One), and desktop and laptop computers and tablets.

According to MarketsandMarkets, the Over-the-Top market is suchestimated to grow from USD 28.04 Billion in 2015 to USD 62.03 Billion by 2020 with a CAGR of 17.2%. Thus, because Over-the-Top is so widely used platformand being rapidly adopted for digital media consumption, demographic data related to its use can provide digital agencies and consumer product companies with a wide variety of critical and yet untapped information about consumers enabling them to target their messages and offerings to such consumers.

  

4

Marketing and Advertising Industry Implications

 

The Company believes Torrent data collected from Over-the-Top viewership and listenership represents a substantial improvement over search and other tracking data utilized to obtain marketing insights, as TorrentOver-the-Top data reflects actual consumption of media with respect to which the downloadingviewing party has taken an affirmative effort to obtain, as opposed to search data, such as Google, which can reflect pure curiosity.

 

Through rigorous testing and analysis, the Company has been able to show that on a general basis, the domestic population of Torrent usersOver-the-Top audiences most commonly residesreside in middle to upper-middle class households, possessing greater than average levels of discretionary income. These results run contrary to general public perception of Torrent users, which are individuals who are unable to afford market priced content and unlikely to convert into sales for consumer product companies. The Company sees this dichotomydemographic skew as a significant opportunity in the marketplace, as the Company’s prospective core client base, digital agencies and consumer product companies, proactively seek new audiences deemed financially worthy of sales and advertising efforts.

 

PeerLogix TorrentOver-The-top Opportunity

 

Torrent UsageOver-the-Top (“OTT”) Adoption and Activity

 

TorrentOver-the-top media viewership represents up to 22% of all worldwide internet traffic and is a geography agnostic platform used by approximately 130-150765 million people worldwide to shareconsume TV shows, movies, music, pictures, video games, e-books and software with one another. online. Representing 10.2% of the global population and 32.1% of digital video viewers worldwide, the global subscription OTT market will grow by 24.0% this year thanks to increasing internet penetration, faster speeds and a broader shift toward internet entertainment, according to eMarketer.

All major entertainment and media content isare available to consumers using Torrent to access media. Of this population of Torrent users, approximately 40 million residetuning in via OTT media platforms – with the United States and 90-110 million are distributed throughout all major and developing countries of the world.

Torrent activity representscategory representing one of the most significant categoriespercentages of global Internet usage, comprising up to 22%internet bandwidth. The Company measures, tracks and archives OTT viewership data of all Internet traffic. Although Torrent data available at any one point in time is ephemeralpremium television shows and is then lost, the Company has been storingmovies from approximately 170 million households and continues to storestores all such data in a fully scalable database which has been aggregating the resultsaccumulating since approximately January 1, 2014, providing the distinctive ability to provide trend dataanalysis on the basis of media consumption. worldwide entertainment viewing habits.

The Company’s proprietary platform operates on an automatic basis with little human interaction and continually acquires and catalogues Torrent data on OTT media activity in real time, obtaining millions of data points daily.

 

2

PeerLogix Platform

 

The Company’s proprietary technologyplatform enables the tracking and cataloguingcataloging of Torrent files and Torrent networksOTT media in order to determine consumer trends and preferences based upon media consumption. The Company’s patent pendingPeerLogix’s patented platform collects Torrentover-the-top data, including IP addresses of the uploading and downloading parties (e.g., location), the name, file type, media type (whether movie, television, documentary, music, e-books, software, etc.), and genre of media downloaded. The Companydownloaded, and utilizes licensed and publicly available demographic and other databases to further filter the collected data to provide insights into consumer preferences to digital advertising firms, product and media companies, entertainment studios and others.

 

How is Torrent Utilized?

Typical steps taken for an “everyday person” to download media using Torrent are: a) search for a respective piece of media (e.g., Classic Rock Music) using a commonly accessible search engine (e.g., Google, Yahoo); b) download a small .torrent file representing the internet coordinates of the desired media content to the consumer’s local computer; and c) open the aforementioned .torrent file utilizing a commonly available Torrent client (e.g., BitTorrent, Vuze) to download the entirety of the desired media content to the consumer’s local computer.

5

PeerLogix Application

 

Market

 

Understanding customer and target audience information is of the upmost importance for organizations undertaking media planning activities. As marketing becomes increasingly data-centric, the ability to obtain rich insights about consumers’ media preferences is expected to represent a significant competitive advantage for the Company’s clients.

 

According to International Data Corporation (IDC), the big data technology and services market will grow at a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 23.1% over the 2014-2019 forecast period with annual spending reaching $48.6 billion in 2019. This is the market targeted by the Company.

 

The Company’s platform analyzes its proprietary Torrentconsists of a Media Library with over 3 billion records of over 600 millionstreaming activity and media downloads and overlays it with select third party demographic and behavioral datasetsof entertainment programming (i.e., television shows, movies, etc.). The data is leverageable by clients of the Company to determine the degree of likelihood a client’s target audience isadvertise to, be interested in a specific TV show, musical artist, movie, video game and/or commercial software package. By blending Torrent data with third party datasets, the Company’s platform enables media pattern identification and tracking and furthermore, enables clients to test assumptions about who their customers really are and the specific media (i.e., television shows, movies, etc.) those customers truly value.value through proprietary media pattern identification and tracking.

 

Services Offered

 

The services to be offered by the Company are two-fold:

 

1) A Software-as-a-Service (SaaS) applicationAdvertising services that is a personalized dashboard delivering fully automated, real-time insightsprovide marketers, publishers and analysis. The application automatically updates information, visualizationsnetworks custom digital audience segments that match specific advertiser criteria (e.g., specific sporting interests, television show, media genre, actor/actress, etc.). This enables media planners to buy qualified audiences directly and stated trends based on on-going worldwide Torrent activity.execute digital campaigns either through the client's ad server or an existing DSP or SSP relationship.

 

2) A digital advertising platformData licensing services that enables advertising to Torrent households, effectively providing a gateway for entertainment industry, lifestyle brandprovide networks, studios and other clients to promote products and messages to users of Torrent.

Application Main Features

Simplicity

To facilitate easy adoption, the Company’s SaaS application does not require any download or installation from clients. Users are provided a login and are able to gain easy access from anywhere in the world.

Ease of Use

The Company has invested resources into user design, and prioritized user-experience within the product. The result is an easy to use interface that reflects the psychology and preferences of its clients. The Company’s application incorporates cutting-edge charts and visualizations to enhance user experience, to meet the demands of companies in today’s marketplace. The result is a format that the Company believes will result in faster adoption and market penetration for its solution.

Compliance

Working under a client-server architecture, usage and adoptability statistics are monitored and consequently viewable by the managementcontent creators unfettered analysis of the Company’s clients, enabling them to effectively gauge ROI directly attributable toOTT data. Macro-level viewership analysis of millions of households can increase licensing efficiency for both networks and studios by better understanding the Company’s solution.popularity of specific med content (i.e., television shows and movies) in markets around the world.

6

 

Product Architecture

 

Architecture

 

The client-server cloud-based architecture provides several key advantages for the security, scalability and redundancy of the infrastructure.

 

3

Client Security

 

The Company’s application is a “thin client”, meaning all requests, proprietary data and algorithms reside on the server side. All communications between the Dashboard and servers are through an encrypted channel.channels.

 

Server Scalability and Redundancy

 

All of the Company’s web services are hosted on the Amazon EC2 cloud, which is a web service that provides resizable compute capacity in the cloud. The Company’s current architecture allows it to further scale out (add more servers) and/or scale up (add more capacity to an existing server) within minutes, and its current architecture has been tested successfully under heavy stress tests. Additionally, the Company’s load balancers enable updates and maintenance without any downtime and all of its data is backed up and mirrored between two SQL servers (AnSQL server is a Microsoft product used to manage and store information. The aforementioned data stored inside an SQL server will be housed in aan archived database).

 

Server Security

 

The Company’s web services on Amazon EC2 have gone through a hardening process to enhance their security according to known practices, and all algorithms and data servers are isolated from the internet. Only requests originating from the Company’s Dashboard are delivered to its data servers, with all other connection requests ignored.

 

Proprietary TorrentPeer-to-Peer Monitoring System

 

The Torrentpeer-to-peer protocol is a communications protocol that enables computers to share Media Files (e.g., TV shows, movies, music, video games and commercial software). Rather than making a single TCP connection (TCP enables two hosts to establish a connection and exchange streams of data), Torrentpeer-to-peer enables a single user to download Media Files over many small data requests over different IP connections from a multitude of distributing computers simultaneously, resulting in quicker and more reliable download speeds for the user. A Torrent Clientpeer-to-peer client utilized by an individual uses files with an extension of “.torrent” to coordinatecoordinates Media File distribution by locating other computers in any geography of the world sharing part or the entirety of the contents of said Media File. To accomplish this series of actions, the Torrent Clientpeer-to-peer client running on the distributing/sharing individual’s computer breaks the Media File into a number of smaller but identically sized pieces. Pieces are typically downloaded non-sequentially by the Torrent Clientpeer-to-peer client on the downloading individual’s computer and are rearranged into the correct order by the Torrent Clientpeer-to-peer client on the downloading individual’s computer (see below). Typical Media File sharing architecture utilizing Torrent Protocola peer-to-peer protocol (the Company’s technology is not depicted):

 

 

 74 

  

Search Scraper

 

The Company’s Search Scraper scans websites and message forums to find .torrentmedia files of major entertainment interests (e.g., television shows, movies, music and video games), extracts their web addresses, and subsequently downloads any ..torrentthe location of the media files found into a MySQL database (MySQL is an open source relational database management system. Information in a MySQL database is stored in the form of related tables). This process mimics the behavior a person would undertake to obtain .torrent files.Over-the-Top media files on their own. The Company believes its proprietary search technology is capable of finding the vast majority of .torrentfreely available Over-the-Top files in existence on the internet.

Accuracy & Geo-location

 

The Company incorporates a third partythird-party geo-location service provided by Digital Element to determine authenticity of IP Addresses as well as their physical geographic location to an accuracy of a few hundred yards. IP Addresses deemed to be virtual private networks (VPNs) or using an alternative masking service are flagged, giving the Company the ability to filter them out during later analysis steps, if deemed necessary. Information the Company is able to directly conclude about Torrent usersOver-the-Top households as a result of their IP Address are: Country, Region/State, City, ZIP/Postal Code, Internet Connection Type & Speed, Mobile Carrier (if applicable), Latitude/Longitude (approximate), Internet Service Provider, Home/Business, and Company Name (if applicable).

 

Consumer Privacy

 

The Company’s Torrent data meets anonymity standards necessary to be classified as non-personally identifiable information (Non-PII), and all contributors have taken an affirmative effort to download, stream, participate in, or contribute to the respective Torrent Network or NetworksOver-the-Top network containing media files of interest. As a result, the Company’s data collection methods meet or exceed the current accountability and data collection standards of domestic and many international government and regulatory agencies.

8

  

Market Positioning & Product Expansion

 

Worldwide Solution

 

The Company sees its large swath of international data as a significant competitive advantage compared to alternative data offerings. Its data is contributed to by individuals from the vast majority of countries in the world. As a result, the Company has the ability to offer clients information giving them a strategic advantage when entering new markets, such as understanding the cultural preferences of local populations, consequently better positioning products with locally preferred music artists, television or movie content.

 

Competitive Advantages

 

The Company, and the Torrent data it collects possess three significant competitive advantages to other data sources.

 

 ·Scale – Torrent users,Over-the-Top audience data, and consequently each data point the Company collects, represent individuals from the vast majority of countries around the world. As a result, the Company is able to measure specific media preferences of populations in most countries, and is not limited to predefined major markets. Clients of the Company are able to gain significant competitive advantages understanding media preferences within new markets they choose to enter with their products (e.g., introducing a new consumer packaged goodsgood product into a select province of India or Indonesia).
 ·Granularity – The Company’s Torrent tracking mechanisms are location agnostic, and its incorporated geo-location service is able to identify the physical location of a Torrent userviewers within the accuracy of a few hundred yards. As a result, the Company’s technology is able to determine media preferences on a neighborhood-by-neighborhood level (e.g., television preferences in Manhattan vs Brooklyn), providing clients first of its kind abilities previously unattainable with transactional data.
 ·

Transactional Data – Each Torrent user and Torrent transactiondata record the Company collects in its database represents an affirmative action taken by the Torrent useran individual to obtain and watch/listen to the content. The Company believes that it is theone of only companya few organizations able to provide transactional media information on a worldwide basis, in every major and developing country.

 

Expanding Value of Torrent Data

Third Party Datasets

 

The Company has also collected third party nonproprietary datasets from a multitude of data brokers. These datasets include: Consumer Lifestyles, Sports, Household Characteristics, Financial, Apparel Preferences, Charitable Causes, Political Leanings, Parenting, Hobbies, Food, Travel, Pets, Automotive, Income, Home Market Valuations, Net Worth, Credit Worthiness, Languages, Ethnicities, Gender, Education, Occupation, Children, Marital Status and Religion. All third party data is collected anonymously and aggregated by zip code. By aggregating in this method, the Company is able to overlay information from one or a combination of these datasets to build a profile of popular characteristics associated with Torrent populations.

The Company believes the following implementations, which further-enhance Torrent analysis, provide significant market opportunities for the Company, as well as unique value propositions not identically available from alternative data solutions. Implemented applications include:

PeerLogix Dashboard Primary Features

Audience Analysis - Clients of the Company are able to select a single musical artist, television show, movie, ebook or video game, and discover generalized audience characteristics of the population of downloaders (e.g., the demographics of Jay-Z listeners). This analysis has many applications, and provides entertainers, content owners and studios an easier ability to understand the underlying audience characteristics of content they produce. This facilitates simpler and more efficient marketing efforts and better evaluation of potential merchandising opportunities.

 

 95 

 

Media Analysis – Conversely to the aforementioned Audience Analysis, clients of the Company are able to select a single or multitude of demographics and behaviors from its aggregated third party data, and the PeerLogix Dashboard will calculate highly correlated Torrent downloads associated with those demographics and behaviors. This enables the determination of preferred media preferences of people exhibiting said characteristics (e.g., soccer fans who have a high degree of credit worthiness prefer watching Breaking Bad and Game of Thrones). This analysis has many applications, including but not limited to determining ideal placement of advertising in respect to television programming, assisting agencies and others to direct advertising spend across campaigns and projects.

Development Pipeline

The Company plans to expand its product and service offerings by including additional products that cater to the marketing and advertising needs of its core client base. These offerings include:

Digital Advertising Delivery
·A data pipeline to Digital Advertising Exchanges (an advertising exchange is an automatic platform for selling and buying online advertising inventories where space buyers (advertisers, media agencies, retargeting networks) and suppliers (networks, publisher) meet. An advertising exchange allows automation for buying / selling phases and campaign implementation), enabling direct advertising to Torrent users for clients of said Digital Advertising Exchanges. Utilizing this model, the Company expects that it would receive a royalty payment for each advertising impression shown. The primary advantage of this model is immediate scalability to hundreds (and perhaps thousands) of clients who are already customers of said Digital Advertising Exchanges.
·PeerLogix Digital Advertising Server, enabling website owners who are frequented by Torrent users to receive advertising campaigns facilitated by the Company to their websites. Music and entertainment marketers are increasingly appropriating advertising budgets to target users using music streaming services (e.g., Pandora, Spotify), and the Company sees this model as a compliment to such efforts.

 

Revenue Model

 

Revenue from Clients

 

The Company anticipates that after initial client validation, its solution will beCompany’s audience data is sold most frequently on a subscriptionCost Per Mile basis (“CPM”, i.e., the predetermined price of advertising sold, typically in units of 1000 ad impressions), with estimated annualized revenues per clienta revenue split between $24,000the Company and $96,000.one or more channel partners. The Company intends to offeroffers various pricing modules to accommodate Agencies, Entertainment Studios, Trading Desks, and others. As with most subscription basedusage-based services, the Company intends to offeroffers different subscriptionpricing packages for ongoing support, such as an ongoing support license.custom advertising segments based on media affinities. Over time, the Company intends to apply optimization techniques to determine different pricing schemes. The Company has retained 6 clients to-date, and continues ongoing relationships with each. Revenues from each are invoiced on a per-projectper-client basis, and the Company is either engaged with, or is negotiating proposals with clients whom are now deemed recurring.

 

The Company will offer its clients both online and invoice billing. Online billing will enable easy payment from the client’s business checking account or check card. Invoice billing will require a traditional commercial document being issued by the Company to clients on a monthly basis, typically providing net 30 payment terms.

Foundational Marketing Efforts

 

Public Relations.The Company intends to generate both international and local media coverage for its services, through a variety of channels, including media articles and interviews with management. To date, we have been approached by representatives of several international media companies expressing interest in covering the Company’s developments through earned media, such as news announcements and content creation. The Company’s proactive efforts will be supported by local public relations agencies. It will attempt to focus its efforts on media channels and publications that target advertising and marketing issues, as well as small cap financial industry publications.

 

Online Marketing.The Company intends to utilize online campaigns that are designed to direct additional potential customers to its services. Rigorous social media profiles on top platforms will assist in bolstering the Company’s value proposition to the market; top platforms include: Facebook, LinkedIn, Twitter, Wikipedia.

10

   

The Company believes in utilizing Earned Media to bolster its value proposition to both client and investor markets. Core areas of concentration will include: publishing company news and industry news via distribution channels, including 1st party blogs and investor relations webpages; social media feeds, including: Facebook, LinkedIn and Twitter; weekly and quarterly newsletters intended to provide proprietary value to companies in the industry (e.g., ADP Quarterly Jobs Report vs PeerLogix Quarterly Media Report).

 

Thought Leadership.Management intends to develop periodic thought leadership pieces on advertising data and the current and future state of media trends. By participating in industry events and conferences, the Company plans to position itself as a source of imminent and forthcoming insight for emerging trends in media and consumer data sciences. The Company intends to originate much of this messaging from events, both hosted by and participated in by the Company, to then continue the topics and conversation through aforementioned social media channels. These “Community Building” efforts are intended to organically build interest in the Company both in its industry and in the financial markets.

 

Acquisition Costs

 

Because the Company offers a software solution, its primary variables in respect to expenses are sales efforts, customer acquisition costs and customer churn.

 

Customer Acquisition Costs.

 

The Company continually evaluates its customer acquisition costs with the intent of optimizing its marketing channels and marketing messages. The Company anticipates Investor and Public Relations costs to comprise a noteworthy percentage of its overall budget. Management intends to implement a broadly inclusive plan, with the intention of drawing a significant amount of attention to the Company’s value proposition for client industries, as well as the Company’s compelling investment thesis to the public markets. Furthermore, these efforts are intended to augment efforts undertaken by the Company’s presales partner, Corporate Rain International (see below), to prompt quicker market penetration of the PeerLogix Dashboard. Specific efforts will include, but are not limited to: public relations strategy, media relations, news announcements, content creation, thought leadership development and traditional and digital advertising. As the Company has experienced and continues to have insufficient working capital to effect its business plan, while it planned on allocating approximately $350,000 to customer acquisition, marketing, sales, public relations and investor relations efforts over an initial 12 month period, with further budgeting to be determined thereafter, to date the Company has allocated only approximately $120,000.

 

Churn

 

SaaS churn is the rate at which SaaS customers, such as those who become clients of the Company, cancel their recurring revenue subscription. It is a general indicator of customer dissatisfaction, cheaper and/or better offers from competitors, more successful sales and/or marketing by competitors, or reasons having to do with the customer life cycle. 5-8% annual churn rates are generally experienced by SaaS companies offering analytics products, and management anticipates similar results with its own customer retention.

6

 

Customer Support

 

To ensure customer satisfaction, the Company’s customer support efforts include both proactive and responsive models.

 

Proactive

 

The Company has developed an event-driven automatic system that notifies its support to errors faced by clients. Errors that could potentially be present in new releases of the Company’s platform are able to be detected by its support staff immediately after a client experiences them.

 

Responsive Model

 

The Company intends to offer online and telephone support for clients to support its products and services.

 

11

  

Intellectual Property

 

The Company has filed a patent application, including a secondary continuation-in-part (CIP) patent, on its proprietary TorrentOver-the-Top tracking technology and business applications. On May 22, 2018 the Company was granted its first patent application (US20140289860A1). The Company hasCompany’s CIP patent pending statusapplication was filed on March 19, 2014 and is currently in the United States (US 13/847,418), Europe, Australia, Canada, Japan and Israel.

The Company has also filed a PCT (Patent Cooperation Treaty) application in China, India, Brazil and Mexico to preserve its ability to later file in these countries.pending.

 

In addition to the Company’s patent portfolio, the Company’s proprietary database contains 1848 months of TorrentOver-the-Top media consumption that cannot be acquired or recreated by new market entrants, as TorrentOver-the-Top data is ephemeral and is therefore lost if not captured. By possessing this historical information, the Company is afforded the unique ability to analyze historical trends that a potential future competitor would not be capable of upon entrance to the market.

 

Competition

 

The Company’s primary competitors are TruOptik, Muzit, Nielsen, Kantar (a subsidiary of WPP Group) and Rentrak. Secondary competitors include Google’s Trends products and Facebook’s suite of advertising tools. Most of these companies have significantly greater resources than the Company. Nielsen’s and Rentrak’s services are largely based on sampling methodologies with a small sample in each market used to measure television and movie viewing behaviors. These are the standards currently employed for the measurement of television and movie behavior for advertising purposes, referred to often times as the “sample currency.” Facebook’s and Google’s services are based on sampling of their users’ posts and search activity which is used to determine present and emerging curiosity of people who participate on their platforms. TruOptik and Muzit also employ a TorrentOver-the-Top sampling methodology, each respectively stating they track TorrentOver-the-Top users. TruOptik’s service is principally a Data Management Platform, built for advertisers, and Muzit focuses on providing services to music artists. It is unknown as to the extent or depth of either of their respective technology’s Torrent tracking and cataloguing capabilities.

 

The Company expects to enjoy a unique competitive position, derived from the scale, granularity and the transactional nature of its data. Its services and systems differ from a sampling service (e.g., Nielsen) in that the Company possesses a measurement system based on a massive amount of passively-collected viewing and listening activity. This results in far more granular, reliable and predictable determination of consumers’ actual preferences as compared to either a small, compensated sample approach (e.g., Nielsen) or search engine data which is merely an expression of interest and not listening or viewing intent.

 

Although the Company believes that it is currently able to compete effectively in the market, it may not be able to do so in the future or be capable of maintaining or further increasing its market share. A failure to compete successfully in its market could adversely affect its business and financial condition.

 

7

Employees

 

The Company currently has four employees located in the United States,one employee and one independent contractor in the United States as of the date of this report. The Company also has three independent contractors located in New Zealand. TheZealand, Greece, and India, respectively. Domestically, the independent contractor and one of the Company’s domestic employeesemployee focus on marketing, research, and development. Internationally, the independent contractors focus on technical development.

None of the Company’s employees are represented by a labor union, and the Company considers its employee relations to be good. The Company also utilizes a number of consultants to assist with research and development and commercialization activities, generally on a monthly retainer basis.

 

The Company intends to hire additional personnel to focus on account management, development, marketing, customer support and technological support.

 

12

AVAILABLE INFORMATION

 

The Company is subject to the reporting requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (“Exchange Act”). Reports filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) pursuant to the Exchange Act, including annual and quarterly reports, and other reports it files, can be inspected and copied at the public reference facilities maintained by the SEC at 100 F Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20549. Investors may obtain information on the operation of the public reference room by calling the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330. Investors can request copies of these documents upon payment of a duplicating fee by writing to the SEC. The reports we file with the SEC are also available on the SEC’s website (http:(http://www.sec.gov)www.sec.gov).

 

Item 1A. Risk Factors

If any of the following or other risks actually materialize, our business, financial condition, prospects and/or operations could suffer. In such event, the value of our securities could decline.

This Report contains forward-looking statements.

 

Information provided in this Report and in the Exhibits hereto may contain forward-looking statements, which reflect management’s current view with respect to future events and the Company’s performance. Such forward-looking statements may include projections with respect to market size and acceptance, revenues and earnings and marketing and sales strategies.

The Company operates in a highly competitive and highly regulated business environment. The Company’s business can be expected to be affected by government regulation, economic, political and social conditions, business’ response to new and existing products and services and services, technological developments and the ability to obtain and maintain patent and/or other intellectual property protection for its products and intellectual property. The Company’s actual results could differ materially from management’s expectations because of changes both within and outside of the Company’s control.

Risks Related To Our Business and Our Industry

We have suffered from a lack of working capital which, if not remedied, will have a material adverse effect on our ability to execute our business strategy.

The Company has suffered from a lack of working capital which has materially limited its ability to execute its business strategy, including the development and marketing of its products and services, the development of an effective sales and marketing force, and the ability to dedicate adequate resources to investor and public relations. Currently, the Company has no material operating funds. As a result, our financial resources will not be sufficient to satisfy our capital requirements for this period. As a result, we require additional financing in order to meet or execute our business strategy. We cannot predict whether this additional financing will be in the form of equity or debt, or be in another form. We may not be able to obtain the necessary additional capital on a timely basis or on acceptable terms, if at all. In any of these events, we will be unable to implement our current strategy or to repay our debt obligations as they become due. In the event that any future financing should take the form of equity securities, the holders of our common stock may experience additional dilution.

The assets of the Company are subject to senior liens.

At March 11, 2016, there exists a lien covering the assets of the Company securing the repayment by the Company of a promissory note in the amount of $131,250. The promissory note is due on July 28, 2016 or earlier in the event that the gross proceeds of any Company offering equals or exceeds $300,000. The Company does not currently have the ability to repay this loan. The security interest granted to the lender could reduce the Company’s options to raise additional capital. In the event that the Company fails to repay this loan when due, the lender would have the option of commencing a foreclosure proceeding and potentially causing all of the Company’s assets to be sold to repay the loan. In the event that the Company is successful in raising additional capital, the loan repayment would reduce the amount of working capital available to the Company.

13

We are a company that has a limited operating history and it is difficult to predict our futureEmerging growth and operating results.

As of the date of this Report, the Company had limited capital and no operating history. Therefore, the Company is subject to the risks involved with any speculative early-stage enterprise. There is no assurance that the Company will be able to successfully structure, market and distribute its products or services. The Company may experience continuing net losses and negative cash flows from operations. The extent of continuing losses and negative cash flows from operations and the time required to reach profitability are highly uncertain. There is no assurance that the Company will be able to achieve profitability or that profitability, if achieved, can be sustained on an ongoing basis. Such risks for the Company include, butcompanies are not limited to:

·An evolving, unpredictable and unproven business model;
·An intensely competitive developing market with low barriers to entry;
·Rapidly changing technology;
·Managing growth;
·Dependence on key personnel;
·Limited operating capital and limited access to credit; and
·Other unforeseen changes and developments.

In order to address these risks, the Company must, among other things:

·Implement and successfully execute its business strategy;
·Provide superior customer service;
·Respond to competitive developments;
·Attract, retain and motivate qualified personnel; and
·Respond to unforeseen and changing circumstances.

The Company cannot assure you that it will succeed in addressing these risks.

We have not generated any revenues to date and have a history of losses since inception

The Company has not generated material revenue to date and, through December 31, 2015, has incurred net losses of approximately $1.5 million since its formation. It can be expected that the Company will continue to incur significant operating expenses and continue to experience losses in the foreseeable future. As a result, the Company cannot predict when, if ever, it might achieve profitability and cannot be certain that it will be able to sustain profitability, if achieved.

Our independent registered public accounting firm has expressed substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern.

In its audit opinion issued in connection with our consolidated balance sheets as of December 31, 2015 and 2014 and our consolidated statements of operations, stockholder’s deficit and cash flows for the years ended December 31, 2015 and 2014, our independent registered public accounting firm has expressed substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern given our recurring net losses, negative cash flows from operations and working capital deficiency. The accompanying financial statements have been prepared on a going concern basis, which contemplates the realization of assets and the satisfaction of liabilities and commitments in the normal course of business. The financial statements do not include any adjustments relating to the recoverability and classification of recorded asset amounts or amounts of liabilities that might be necessary should we be unable to continue in existence.

14

The Company will face substantial competition

The technology, information, data aggregation and measurement industries are very competitive, and are characterized by large, global businesses that utilize technological solutions as well as physical data aggregation and audience measurement systems to capture and obtain data and segregate such data into products and solutions for sale to various industries. The technology utilized by these businesses is rapidly evolving and the business is intensely competitive. The Company expects such competition to intensify in the future. Barriers to entry are minimal, allowing current and new competitors to launch new services at a relatively low cost. The Company currently or potentially competes with a variety of other companies. These competitors include major companies such as Neilsen, Comscore, Facebook, Google, Twitter and others. Competition may also arise from the local, national and global companies that may enter the industry such as advertising agencies, media companies and others which, if successful, could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, prospects, financial condition and results of operations.

The Company believes that the principal competitive factors in the data aggregation industry are:

·Brand name recognition;
·Customer service;
·Technological capabilities;
·Quality of data;
·Ease of use; and
·Online availability.

All of the Company’s competitors have operating histories, significant customer bases, greater brand recognition and significantly greater financial, marketing and other resources. Competitors devote greater resources to marketing and promotional campaigns and devote substantially more resources to website and systems development. Increased competition may result in reduced operating margins. The Company cannot assure potential investors that the Company will compete successfully against existing or future competitors.

The Company’s products will represent new and rapidly evolving technologies

The Company’s products depend on new, rapidly evolving technologies and on the marketability and profitability of these products. The Company’s ability to commercialize its products and services will depend upon its ability to develop new products and services to remain competitive; its ability to develop, adopt or have access to new technologies; its ability to successfully implement its marketing and promotion strategy; its ability to have access to Torrent data; its ability to retain and grow the customer base; its ability to provide adequate server, network and system capacity through the Amazon Cloud services or otherwise; the risk of unanticipated increased costs for network services; increased competition from providers of Internet and peer-to-peer services; its ability to maintain and grow market share in the industry; and the risks from changes in U.S. and international regulatory environments affecting Torrent data and data and information aggregation services. The occurrence of any of these risks could have a material adverse effect on the business, prospects, financial condition and results of operations of the Company. In addition, if the Company were unable, for technical, legal, financial or other reasons, to obtain Torrent data, the Company’s business, prospects, financial condition and results of operations would be materially adversely affected.

The Company will need to manage growth

In order to maximize the potential growth in the Company’s market opportunities, the Company believes that it must expand rapidly and significantly. The impetus for expansion will place a significant strain on the Company’s management, operational and financial resources. In order to manage growth, the Company must implement and continually improve its operational and financial systems, expand operations, attract and retain superior management and train, manage and expand its employee base. The Company can give no assurance that it will effectively manage its operations, that its systems, procedures, or controls will adequately support its operations or that the Company’s management will successfully implement its business plan. If the Company cannot effectively manage its growth, the Company’s business, prospects, financial condition and results of operations could be materially adversely affected.

15

The Company may experience fluctuations in operating results

Given the early stage of the Company and the rapidly evolving nature of the markets in which the Company will be competing, the Company expects to experience significant fluctuations in the future operating results due to a variety of factors, many of which are outside of its control. Factors that may adversely affect the Company’s operating results include, without limitation, the following:

·The continued acceptance and use of the Internet and Torrent downloads by consumers;
·The ability of the Company to develop and upgrade its systems and infrastructure;
·The announcement or introduction of new products and services by the competitors of the Company;
·The amount and timing of operating costs and capital expenditures relating to the expansion of the Company’s business, operations and infrastructure; and
·General economic conditions and economic conditions specific to the Internet.

Dependence on Management

The success of the Company is highly dependent upon the capabilities of the management of the Company, as is the success of any business dependent upon the ability of those responsible for making the important business decisions. Although the Company will seek to hire and retain qualified software engineers, technical personnel and managers with business experience and abilities commensurate with the needs of the Company, there is no assurance that the Company will succeed despite its collective efforts.

The loss of the services of the principal members of the Company’s management could hinder the Company’s ability to fulfill its business plan and further develop and commercialize its products and services. The Company faces intense competition for such personnel from other companies. There is no assurance that the Company will be successful in hiring or retaining qualified personnel.

The Company’s performance will depend substantially on the continued services and performance of its senior management and other key personnel. The Company’s performance will also depend on its ability to retain and motivate its other qualified officers and key employees. The loss of the services of any of its executive officers or other key employees could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, prospects, financial condition and results of operation. The Company’s future success also depends on its ability to identify, attract, hire, train, retain and motivate other highly skilled technical, marketing, managerial and financial personnel. Competition for such personnel is intense, and the Company’s failure to attract and retain the necessary technical, marketing, managerial and financial personnel could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, prospects, financial condition and results of operations.

Intellectual property and proprietary rights

The Company’s success depends upon proprietary technology and the execution thereof. The Company will rely on a combination of patent, trademark, copyright and trade-secret laws, as well as confidentiality agreements and technical measures to protect its proprietary rights. Much of the Company’s proprietary information may not be patentable, and the Company does not currently possess any patents, although the Company does have a single patent pending currently. The Company cannot assure that it will develop proprietary products or processes that are patentable, and that if issued, that any patent will give a competitive advantage or that such patent will not be challenged by third parties, or that the patents of others will not have a material adverse effect on the Company’s ability to do business. The Company may apply to register certain trademarks in, or claim certain trademark rights in, the United States and/or foreign jurisdictions. The Company cannot assure that its means of protecting its proprietary rights will suffice or that the Company’s competitors will not independently develop competitive technology or duplicate services or design around patents or other intellectual property rights issued to the Company.

16

Uninsured losses

The Company may not be able to arrange for comprehensive insurance, including liability, fire, and extended coverage and where economically feasible, earthquake and flood insurance for its business, which is customarily obtained for similar businesses. The lack of comprehensive insurance could materially adversely affect the Company and the value of its securities in the event of an uninsured loss.

Market size

Management has attempted to determine the potential market for the Company’s products and services, which attempt is based on assumptions. All projections or predictions with respect to market size are for purposes of illustration only. The Company cannot predict the size of the market with any guarantee of accuracy. Accordingly, the size of the market anticipated by the Company may be materially greater or lesser than the actual market size.

Developing market; unproven acceptance of the Company’s services

The markets for the Company’s services are rapidly evolving and are characterized by an increasing number of market entrants who have introduced or developed competitive services and products. As is typical in the case of a new and rapidly evolving industry, demand and market acceptance for recently introduced products and services are subject to a high level of uncertainty and risk. If the market fails to develop, develops more slowly than expected or becomes saturated with competitors, or if the Company’s products and services do not achieve or sustain market acceptance, the Company’s business, prospects, financial condition and results of operations would be materially adversely effected.

Rapid technological change

To remain competitive, the Company will be required to continually enhance and improve the responsiveness, functionality and features of its technology. The Internet, mobile phone and social networking industries are characterized by rapid technological change, changes in user and customer requirements and preferences, frequent new product and service introductions embodying new technologies and the emergence of new industry standards and practices that could at any time render its then existing products and services, as well as proprietary technology and systems, obsolete. The Company’s future success will depend, in part, on its ability to develop leading software and technologies useful in its business, enhance its existing services, develop new services and technologies that address the increasingly sophisticated and varied needs of its prospective customers, and respond to technological advances and emerging industry standards and practices on a cost-effective and timely basis. The development of other proprietary technology entails significant technical and business risks. There can be no assurance that the Company will successfully use new technologies effectively or adapt its software and technology (proprietary or otherwise) to customer requirements or emerging industry standards. If the Company were unable, for technical, legal, financial or other reasons, to adapt in a timely manner in response to changing market conditions or customer requirements, the Company’s business, prospects, financial condition and results of operations would be materially adversely affected.

Liability exposure

Although the Company intends to obtain appropriate liability insurance in the future, it cannot guarantee that it will be able to obtain such insurance or that any such insurance will be sufficient to cover all possible liabilities. Liability claims, regardless of their ultimate outcome, could result in costly litigation and could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, prospects, financial condition and results of operations.

There is a substantial risk that we may be exposed to litigations in connection with claims arising out of our failure to file registration statement(s).

In August 2015, we entered into registration rights agreements with all of our then shareholders, pursuant to which we committed to file a registration statement covering the resale of certain shares of common stock and shares of common stock underlying warrants issued in our offerings within 60 days from August 14, 2015, and shall use commercially reasonable efforts to cause the registration statement to become effective no later than 90 days after it is filed. However, as of the date of this filing, we have not filed a registration statement. The registration rights agreements do not contain a penalty clause for the failure to file a registration statement within the period agreed upon. However, we do not exclude the possibility that our shareholders may bring litigations against us in connection with claims arising out of our failure to file a registration statement pursuant to the registration rights agreements and seek remedies under the common law.

The Company will rely on Amazon Cloud for hosting services

The Company utilizes and intends to continue to utilize the Amazon Cloud to host its overall technology platforms. If the Amazon Cloud business services were to be interrupted for any material period of time, breached by hackers, or otherwise be non-functioning or unavailable for use, this could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, prospects, financial condition and results of operations. Replication of the network infrastructure of the Amazon Cloud would be costly and time consuming, and the Company can give no assurance that such replication, in whole or in part, could be achieved in a short time frame or at all, which could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, prospects, financial condition and results of operations.

17

Our future potential products in our development pipeline are in the early stages and may never be commercially successful.

Our future potential products in our development pipeline are either at very early stages of product development or pre-definition and may never be developed or commercialized. The progress and results of any future products are uncertain, and may result in a failure to develop additional effective products. Even if we successfully complete one or more of our future potential products’ development, they may not be commercially successful due to, among other things, low market acceptance. Third parties may develop superior products or have proprietary rights that preclude us from marketing our products.

We only recently established limited sales and marketing capabilities, and we may be unable to effectively sell, market and distribute our products in the future, and the failure to do so would have an adverse effect on our business and results of operations.

We only recently established limited sales and marketing capabilities. If we are unable to develop an effective sales, marketing, customer relationship management and distribution capabilities or enter into agreements with third parties to perform these functions, we will not be able to successfully commercialize our services and products. We currently have only limited internal sales and marketing capabilities. In order to successfully commercialize any of our products, we must either further internally develop sales, marketing, and customer relationship management and distribution capabilities or make arrangements with third parties to perform these services.

If we do not develop a skilled marketing and sales force and supporting customer relationship management, we will be unable to successfully market any of our services and products directly. To promote any of our potential products through third parties, we will have to locate acceptable third parties for these functions and enter into agreements with them on acceptable terms, and we may not be able to do so.

We may be unable to obtain requisite data and other content to source our services and products.

Our products andservices rely on data collected from Torrent networks. Once received, the data must be reviewed, processed and integrated. If we are unable to obtain quality Torrent data, for reasons such as, but not limited to: changing technology protocols, or changing behavior in respect to how consumers’ obtain media, we may not be able to meet the needs of our clients, and we could lose clients, and therefore impact on our ability to grow our business, which could result in a material adverse effect on our results of operations, financial condition and cash flows.

The future success of our company is highly dependent on our ability to maintain and grow our base of clients who subscribe to our services and products.

Our success depends on effective software solutions, marketing, sales and customer relations for our services and products, as well as acceptance of future enhancements and new products andservices by our prospective clients. If we are unable to both retain clients and secure new clients, our results of operations, financial condition and cash flows will be adversely affected.

Our services and products are highly dependent on employees who are skilled and experienced in information technologies.

If we are unable to attract, hire and retain high quality information technology personnel at a reasonable cost, we may not be able to meet the needs of clients, enhance existing services, or develop new lines of business. This inability could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, financial condition and cash flows.

18

Measurement services are receiving a high level of consumer group and government scrutiny relating to the privacy issues around the methodologies used in targeted advertising.

Although we are confident that our anonymous data aggregation methodologies are compliant with all current privacy laws, it is possible that privacy trends and market perceptions of the transparency of data could result in additional government restrictions or limitations on the use of that data, which would adversely affect many of our products. We believe it is unlikely that we will be required to change or limit our products. Nonetheless, if additional government restrictions are imposed, such restrictions could slow our ability to realize a return on our investments in new data-driven products or result in additional costs not currently anticipated.

Our services are highly dependent on the effective and efficient use of technology and our overall information management infrastructure.

If we are unable to acquire, establish and maintain our information management systems to ensure accurate, reliable and timely data processed in an efficient and cost effective manner, we may not be able to meet the needs of clients, enhance existing services or develop new lines of business. This inability could have an adverse effect on our business and long-term growth prospects.

Interruption or failure of our information technology and communications systems could hurt our ability to effectively provide our products and services, which could damage our reputation and harm our operating results.

The availability of our products and services depends on the continuing operation of our information technology and communications systems. Some of our systems are not fully redundant, and our disaster recovery planning cannot account for all eventualities. The occurrence of a natural disaster, a decision to close a facility we are using without adequate notice for financial reasons, or other unanticipated problems at our data centers could result in lengthy interruptions in our service. In addition, our products and services are highly technical and complex and may contain errors or vulnerabilities. Any errors or vulnerabilities in our products and services, or damage to or failure of our systems, could result in interruptions in our services, which could reduce our revenue and results of operations.

Risks Related to Our Common Stock; Liquidity Risks

Our securities are “Penny Stock" and subject to specific rules governing their sale to investors.

The SEC has adopted Rule 15g-9 which establishes the definition of a “penny stock,” for the purposes relevant to the Company, as any equity security that has a market price of less than $5.00 per share or with an exercise price of less than $5.00 per share, subject to certain exceptions. For any transaction involving a penny stock, unless exempt, the rules require that a broker or dealer approve a person’s account for transactions in penny stocks; and the broker or dealer receive from the investor a written agreement to the transaction, setting forth the identity and quantity of the penny stock to be purchased.

In order to approve a person’s account for transactions in penny stocks, the broker or dealer must obtain financial information and investment experience objectives of the person; and make a reasonable determination that the transactions in penny stocks are suitable for that person and the person has sufficient knowledge and experience in financial matters to be capable of evaluating the risks of transactions in penny stocks.

The broker or dealer must also deliver, prior to any transaction in a penny stock, a disclosure schedule prescribed by the SEC relating to the penny stock market, which, in highlight form sets forth the basis on which the broker or dealer made the suitability determination; and that the broker or dealer received a signed, written agreement from the investor prior to the transaction.

Generally, brokers may be less willing to execute transactions in securities subject to the “penny stock” rules. This may make it more difficult for Company’s shareholders to sell shares of our common stock.

Disclosure also has to be made about the risks of investing in penny stocks in both public offerings and in secondary trading and about the commissions payable to both the broker-dealer and the registered representative, current quotations for the securities and the rights and remedies available to an investor in cases of fraud in penny stock transactions. Finally, monthly statements have to be sent disclosing recent price information for the penny stock held in the account and information on the limited market in penny stocks.

19

There is very limited recent trading activity in our common stock and there is no assurance that an active market will develop in the future.

There is only very limited trading activity in our common stock and essentially no liquidity for our securities. Further, although the common stock is currently quoted on the OTC Pink Market, maintained by OTC Markets, Inc., trading of our common stock may be extremely sporadic. For example, several days may pass before any shares may be traded. As a result, an investor may find it difficult or impossible to dispose of, or to obtain accurate quotations of the price of, the common stock. There can be no assurance that an active market for our common stock will ever develop, or if one should develop, there is no assurance that it will be sustained. This severely limits the liquidity of the common stock and our ability to raise capital.

Because we became public by means of a Share Exchange, we may not be able to attract the attention of major brokerage firms.

Additional risks may exist since we became public through a “Share Exchange.” Securities analysts of major brokerage firms may not provide coverage of us since there is little incentive to brokerage firms to recommend the purchase of our Common Stock. No assurance can be given that brokerage firms will want to conduct any secondary offerings on behalf in the future.

Compliance with the reporting requirements of federal securities laws can be expensive.

The Company is a public reporting company in the United States, and accordingly, subject to the information and reporting requirements of the Exchange Act and other federal securities laws, and the compliance obligations of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. The costs of preparing and filing annual and quarterly reports and other information with the SEC and furnishing audited reports to stockholders are substantial. In addition, the Company will incur substantial expenses in connection with the preparation of the Registration Statement and related documents with respect to the registration of resales of the Common Stock owned by its shareholders.

Applicable regulatory requirements, including those contained in and issued under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, may make it difficult for the Company to retain or attract qualified officers and directors, which could adversely affect the management of its business and its ability to obtain or retain listing of its Common Stock.

The Company may be unable to attract and retain those qualified officers, directors and members of board committees required to provide for effective management because of the rules and regulations that govern publicly held companies, including, but not limited to, certificationsinformation required by principal executive officers. The enactment of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act has resulted in the issuance of a series of related rules and regulations and the strengthening of existing rules and regulations by the SEC, as well as the adoption of new and more stringent rules by the stock exchanges. The perceived increased personal risk associated with these changes may deter qualified individuals from accepting roles as directors and executive officers.

Further, some of these changes heighten the requirements for board or committee membership, particularly with respect to an individual’s independence from the corporation and level of experience in finance and accounting matters. The Company may have difficulty attracting and retaining directors with the requisite qualifications. If the Company is unable to attract and retain qualified officers and directors, the management of its business and its ability to obtain or retain listing of our shares of Common Stock on any stock exchange (assuming the Company elects to seek and are successful in obtaining such listing) could be adversely affected.

The Company may have undisclosed liabilities and any such liabilities could harm the Company’s revenues, business, prospects, financial condition and results of operations.

Even though we represented in the Share Exchange Agreement that we had no liabilities at the closing of the Share Exchange, there can be no assurance that there are no unknown liabilities. Any such liabilities that survive the Share Exchange could harm the Company’s revenues, business, prospects, financial condition and results of operations upon the Company’s acceptance of responsibility for such liabilities.

20

If the Company fails to maintain an effective system of internal controls, it may not be able to accurately report its financial results or detect fraud. Consequently, investors could lose confidence in the Company’s financial reporting and this may decrease the trading price of its stock.

Effective internal control is necessary for us to provide reliable financial reports and prevent fraud. If we cannot provide reliable financial reports or prevent fraud, we may not be able to manage our business as effectively as we would if an effective control environment existed, and our business and reputation with investors may be harmed.

We currently have insufficient written policies and procedures for accounting and financial reporting with respect to the requirements and application of US GAAP and SEC disclosure requirements. Additionally, there is a lack of formal process and timeline for closing the books and records at the end of each reporting period. Such a documented weakness could restrict our ability to timely gather, analyze and report information relative to our financial statements.

Because of our limited resources, there are limited controls over our information processing. There is inadequate segregation of duties consistent with control objectives. Our management is composed of a small number of individuals resulting in a situation where limitations on segregation of duties exist. In order to remedy this situation we would need to hire additional staff. Currently, we are unable to afford to hire additional staff to facilitate greater segregation of duties but will reassess our capabilities in the following year.

Management believes that the material weaknesses set forth above are the result of the lack of scale of our operations and are intrinsic to our small size. Nonetheless, our small size and our current internal control deficiencies may have a material adverse effect on our ability to accurately and timely report our financial information which, in turn, may have a material adverse effect on our financial condition.

As a result of our small size and our current internal control deficiencies, our financial condition, results of operation and access to capital may be materially adversely affected.

The price of the Common Stock may become volatile, which could lead to losses by investors and costly securities litigation.

The trading price of the Common Stock is likely to be highly volatile and could fluctuate in response to factors such as:

·actual or anticipated variations in the Company’s operating results or financial condition;
·announcements of developments by the Company or its competitors;
·regulatory actions regarding the Company’s products
·announcements by the Company or its competitors of significant acquisitions, strategic partnerships, joint ventures or capital commitments;
·adoption of new accounting standards affecting the Company’s industry;
·additions or departures of key personnel;
·introduction of new products by the Company or its competitors;
·sales of the Company’s Common Stock or other securities in the open market; and
·other events or factors, many of which are beyond the Company’s control.

The stock market is subject to significant price and volume fluctuations. In the past, following periods of volatility in the market price of a company’s securities, securities class action litigation has often been initiated against such a company. Litigation initiated against the Company, whether or not successful, could result in substantial costs and diversion of its management’s attention and resources, which could harm the Company’s business and financial condition.

21

Investors may experience dilution of their ownership interests because of the future issuance of additional shares of the common stock.

In the future, the Company will likely issue additional authorized but previously unissued equity securities, resulting in the dilution of the ownership interests of its present stockholders. The Company may also issue additional shares of its common stock or other securities that are convertible into or exercisable for common stock in connection with hiring or retaining employees, future acquisitions, future sales of its securities for capital raising purposes, or for other business purposes. The future issuance of any such additional shares of common stock may create downward pressure on the trading price of the common stock. It should be expected that the Company will be required to issue additional shares, warrants or other convertible securities in the future in conjunction with capital raising efforts, including issuances at a price (or exercise prices) below the price at which shares of the common stock is currently traded on the OTC Markets.

The Common Stock is controlled by insiders.

The Company’s officers and directors beneficially own approximately 58.20% of our outstanding shares of Common Stock. Such concentrated control of the Company may adversely affect the price of its Common Stock. Investors who acquire Common Stock may have no effective voice in the management of the Company. Sales by insiders or affiliates of the Company, along with any other market transactions, could affect the market price of the Common Stock.

There are a significant number of shares of common stock eligible for sale, which could depress the market price of such shares.

There are 19,345,404 shares of restricted common stock held by existing shareholders. A significant number of such shares will become available for sale in the public market at various times during 2016 (subject to certain regulatory rules and restrictions). In addition, we have an obligation to register a significant number of shares for resale from our prior offerings. (Please refer to Financing Transactions under Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations for more information.) The availability of such a large number of shares of common stock for sale in the public market could harm the market price of our stock.1A.

IN ADDITION TO THE ABOVE RISKS, BUSINESSES ARE OFTEN SUBJECT TO RISKS NOT FORESEEN OR FULLY APPRECIATED BY MANAGEMENT. IN REVIEWING THIS ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K, YOU SHOULD KEEP IN MIND THAT THERE MAY BE OTHER POSSIBLE RISKS THAT COULD BE IMPORTANT.

 

Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments.

 

Not applicable.

Item 2. Properties.

 

Our executive offices are located in leased premises, under a month-to-month agreement, at 119 West 24th Street, 4th Floor, New York, NY 10011 and our phone number is646-825-8549.

 

Item 3. Legal Proceedings.

 

From time to time we may be named in claims arising in the ordinary course of business. Currently, no legal proceedings, government actions, administrative actions, investigations or claims are pending against us or involve us that, in the opinion of our management, could reasonably be expected to have a material adverse effect on our business and financial condition.

 

We anticipate that we will expend significant financial and managerial resources in the defense of our intellectual property rights in the future if we believe that our rights have been violated. We also anticipate that we will expend significant financial and managerial resources to defend against claims that our products and services infringe upon the intellectual property rights of third parties.

 

Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures.

 

Not applicable.

 

 228 

 

PART II

Item 5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities.

 

Market Information

 

Our common stock was traded on the OTCQB marketplace under the symbol RLQT from June 10, 2015 through September 22, 2015. Our common stock was tradednow trades on the OTCQB marketplace under the symbol “LOGX” from September 23, 2015 through February 13, 2016. Currently, our common stock is traded on the OTC Pink marketplace under the symbol “LOGX”.“LOGX.” The following table sets forth the range of high and low bid prices for our common stock for each of the periods indicated as reported by such marketplaces. These quotations reflect inter-dealer prices, without retail mark-up, mark-down or commission and may not represent actual transactions. On April 12, 2016,February 25, 2019, the closing price of our common stock as reported on the OTC Pink marketplace was $0.11$0.15 per share.

 

Quarter Ended

High

Low

March 31, 2015******

June 30, 2015

$1.40

$1.25

September 30, 2015$2.50$0.40
December 31, 2015$0.53$0.44
March 31, 2016$0.46$0.01

***Our common stock did not trade between approximately July 15, 2013 and June 9, 2015.

Quarter Ended

High

Low

March 31, 2018$0.10$0.05
June 30, 2018$0.19$0.05
September 30, 2018$0.16$0.05
December 31, 2018$0.13$0.04

 

We consider our common stock to be thinly traded and, accordingly, reported sales prices or quotations may not be a true market-based valuation of our common stock.

 

Holders

 

As of April 14, 2016, 23,345,035December 18, 2020, 67,744,953 shares of Common Stock were issued and outstanding, which were held by approximately 5770 holders of record. We also believe there are more owners of our common stock whose shares are held by nominees or in street name.

 

Dividends

 

We have not paid any dividends and we do not anticipate paying any cash dividends in the foreseeable future and we intend to retain all of our earnings, if any, to finance our growth and operations and to fund the expansion of our business. Payment of any dividends will be made in the discretion of our Board of Directors, after our taking into account various factors, including our financial condition, operating results, current and anticipated cash needs and plans for expansion.

 

20152020 Amended and Restated Equity Incentive Plan

 

The Board of Directors and stockholders of the Company have adopted the 2015 Equity Incentive Plan, which was amended and restated in 2016, 2018 and 2020, which reserves a total of 3,000,00090,000,000 shares of Common Stock for issuance under the 20152020 Plan. If an incentive award granted under the 20152020 Plan expires, terminates, is unexercised or is forfeited, or if any shares are surrendered in connection with an incentive award, the shares subject to such award and the surrendered shares will become available for further awards under the 20152020 Plan.

9

 

Shares issued under the 20152020 Plan through the settlement, assumption or substitution of outstanding awards or obligations to grant future awards as a condition of acquiring another entity are not expected to reduce the maximum number of shares available under the 20152020 Plan. In addition, the number of shares of common stock subject to the 20152020 Plan, any number of shares subject to any numerical limit in the 20152020 Plan, and the number of shares and terms of any incentive award are expected to be adjusted in the event of any change in our outstanding common stock by reason of any stock dividend, spin-off, split-up, stock split, reverse stock split, recapitalization, reclassification, merger, consolidation, liquidation, business combination or exchange of shares or similar transaction.

  

23

Administration

 

It is expected that the Board will administer the 20152020 Plan. Subject to the terms of the 20152020 Plan, the Board would have complete authority and discretion to determine the terms of awards under the 20152020 Plan.

 

Grants

 

The 20152020 Plan is expected to authorize the grant to 20152020 Plan participants of nonqualified stock options, incentive stock options, restricted stock awards, restricted stock units, performance grants intended to comply with Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code (as amended, the “Code”) and stock appreciation rights, as described below:

 

·Options granted under the 20152020 Plan entitle the grantee, upon exercise, to purchase a specified number of shares from the Company at a specified exercise price per share. The exercise price for shares of Common Stock covered by an option cannot be less than the fair market value of the Common Stock on the date of grant unless agreed to otherwise at the time of the grant.

 

·Restricted stock awards and restricted stock units may be awarded on terms and conditions established by the Board, which may include performance conditions for restricted stock awards and the lapse of restrictions on the achievement of one or more performance goals for restricted stock units.

 

·The Board may make performance grants, each of which will contain performance goals for the award, including the performance criteria, the target and maximum amounts payable, and other terms and conditions.

 

·The 20152020 Plan authorizes the granting of stock awards. The Board will establish the number of shares of Common Stock to be awarded and the terms applicable to each award, including performance restrictions.

 

·Stock appreciation rights (“SARs”) entitle the participant to receive a distribution in an amount not to exceed the number of shares of Common Stock subject to the portion of the SAR exercised multiplied by the difference between the market price of a share of Common Stock on the date of exercise of the SAR and the market price of a share of Common Stock on the date of grant of the SAR.

 

Duration, Amendment, and Termination

 

The Board is expected to have the power to amend, suspend or terminate the 20152020 Plan without stockholder approval or ratification at any time or from time to time. No change may be made that increases the total number of shares of Common Stock reserved for issuance pursuant to incentive awards or reduces the minimum exercise price for options or exchange of options for other incentive awards, unless such change is authorized by our stockholders within one year. Unless sooner terminated, the 20152020 Plan would terminate ten years after it is adopted.

10

 

The table below sets forth information as of December 31, 20152018 with respect to compensation plans under which our common stock or options are authorized for issuance.

 

Plan category 

(a)

Number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options, warrants and rights

  

(b)

Weighted-average exercise price of outstanding options, warrants and rights

  

(c)

Number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans (excluding securities reflected in column (a))

 
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders   ��            –  $              –   3,000,000 
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders    $    
Total    $   3,000,000 

24
Plan category 

(a)

Number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options and rights

  

(b)

Weighted-average exercise price of outstanding options, warrants and rights

  

(c)

Number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans (excluding securities reflected in column (a))

 
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders         
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders – 2017 Plan  2,400,000  $0.10    
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders – 2018 Plan  50,000,000   0.09   20,000,000 
Total  52,400,000      20,000,000 

 

Item 6. Selected Financial Data.

 

This item is not required for a smaller reportingan emerging growth company.

 

Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.

 

The following management’s discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with our historical financial statements and the related notes. The management’s discussion and analysis contains forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties, such as statements of our plans, objectives, expectations and intentions. Any statements that are not statements of historical fact are forward-looking statements. When used, the words “believe,” “plan,” “intend,” “anticipate,” “target,” “estimate,” “expect” and the like, and/or future tense or conditional constructions (“will,” “may,” “could,” “should,” etc.), or similar expressions, identify certain of these forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements are subject to risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results or events to differ materially from those expressed or implied by the forward-looking statements in this Report. The Company’s actual results and the timing of events could differ materially from those anticipated in these forward-looking statements as a result of several factors. The Company does not undertake any obligation to update forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances occurring after the date of this Report.

 

As the result of the transactions of which PeerlogixPeerLogix Technologies, Inc. became a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company and the change in business and operations of the Company from a shell company to a technology company, a discussion of our financial results prior to the Share Exchange is not pertinent, and the financial results of PeerLogix Technologies, Inc., the accounting acquirer, are considered the financial results of the Company on a historical and going-forward basis.

11

The discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations are based on our consolidated financial statements, which we have prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. The preparation of these financial statements requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements, as well as the reported revenues and expenses during the reporting periods. On an ongoing basis, we evaluate such estimates and judgments, including those described in greater detail below. We base our estimates on historical experience and on various other factors that we believe are reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying value of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions.

Results of Operations for the Years ended December 31, 20152018 and 20142017

 

The following table sets forth the summary income statement for the years ended December 31, 20152018 and 2014:2017:

 

  For the Year Ended 
  December 31,
2015
  December 31,
2014
 
Revenues $2,520  $ 
Operating Expenses $(1,498,141) $(271,596)
Other Income (Expense), net $(24,893) $(3,563)
Net Loss $(1,520,514) $(275,159)

25
  For the Year Ended 
  December 31,
2018
  December 31,
2017
 
Revenues $57,973  $1,096 
Operating Expenses $(4,823,936) $(1,981,944)
Other Expense, net $(4,745,439) $(3,015,249)
Net Loss $(9,511,402) $(4,996,097)

  

Revenues: From inception, through December 31, 2015 the Company has generated minimal revenues.minimum revenues due to being in the development stage with regard to its technology and channel partner relationships.

 

Operating Expenses: Operating expenses consist primarily of compensation and related costs for personnel and facilities, and include costs related to our facilities, finance, human resources, information technology and fees for professional services. Professional services are principally comprised of outside legal, audit, information technology consulting, marketing, investor relations and outsourcing services.

 

Operating expenses increased by 452%143% during the year ended December 31, 2015,2018, as compared to the year ended December 31, 2014.2017. The overall $1,226,545$2,841,988 increase in operating expenses is primarily attributable to the following approximate net increases (decreases) in operating expenses:

 

·An increase of payroll and related expenses of $269,000 due to an increase in officers’ salaries and the hiring of a Chief Accounting Officer (“CAO”) and a project manager and a project manager assistant. In February 2016, the employment of the CAO was terminated.
·An increase of research and development expenses of $236,000. Research and development expenses consist primarily of payments to third parties for the development of software. We expense research and development costs as incurred until such time that technological feasibility of our product has been established.
·An increase in equity-based compensation expense of $86,000. During the year ended December 31, 2015, the Company recognized $150,000 of equity-based compensation as a result of an equity-based award granted to a consultant. During the year ended December 31, 2014, the Company recognized $64,000 of equity-stock based compensation as a resultto directors of an equity-based award granted to a consultant.approximately $2.2 million.

·An increase in professional feesstock based compensation to consultants of $492,000 (excluding equity-based compensation - see above). In the current period the Company incurred an increase in consulting fees related to business development, financial advisory services and investor relations; an increase in accounting and auditing fees related to public filing requirements; and an increase in legal fees related to merger activities partially offset by a substantial decrease in legal fees related to patent costs.approximately 0.8 million.

·An increase in computer and internetaccumulation of minor decreases across other operating expenses categories of $39,000 primarily due to increases in server costs. The Company leases servers on a monthly basis from a third party.
·An increase in rent expense of $25,000 due to the Company entering into a new lease agreement for its office facility.
·An increase in travel and travel related expenses of $19,000 due to the Company primarily due to an increase in trade show and marketing related activities.
·An increase in advertising of $29,000 as a result of the Company bringing its product to market during 2015.
·An increase in insurance expense of $12,000 as a result of the Company attaining additional insurance coverages.approximately 0.2 million.

 

Other income (expenses),expenses, net: Other income (expense),expense, net consists primarily of interest expense primarily related to the Company’s convertible promissory notes and notes payable.payable and includes non-cash amortization of debt discounts of $703,544 and $1,766,925 and non-cash interest of $111,606 and $1,442,654 for the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively.

 

Other income (expense),

12

In addition, the Company incurred an aggregate of $140,022 loss on extinguishment of debt in fiscal 2018, primarily from settlement of an outstanding convertible note as compared to a loss on settlement of debt of $913,562 in fiscal 2017 primarily from note extensions.

During 2018, the Company reduced previously issued warrants exercisable at $0.10 per share to $0.06 per share as an inducement to exercise. In addition, as part of the exercise of the warrant, the holder would receive one Series B warrant (exercisable at $0.25 per share, expiring four years from issuance -see above) for every four warrants exercised. The Company accounted for the transaction under inducement accounting and accounted for the price reduction of $0.04 per share and the fair value of the Series B warrants as inducement expense in the amount of $734,273.

In 2018, the Company issued convertible notes payable with variable conversion features which included embedded derivatives. As such, the Company is required to bifurcate the fair value of the derivative and mark-to-market each reporting period. During the year ended December 31, 2018, the Company recorded a $1,547,402 loss on change in fair value of derivative liabilities as compared to a $1,741,441 gain for 2017.

Overall, other expense, net - increased by $21,330$1,730,190 to $(24,893)$4,745,439 during the year ended December 31, 20152018 as compared to $(3,563)$3,015,249 during the year ended December 31, 2014.2017.

  

Liquidity and Capital Resources

 

The following table summarizes total current assets, liabilities and working capital at December 31, 20152018 compared to December 31, 2014:2017:

 

  Period ended    
  December 31,
2015
  December 31,
2014
  Increase/
(Decrease)
 
Current Assets $21,271  $10,544  $10,727 
Current Liabilities $297,728  $200,738  $96,990 
Working Capital Deficit $(276,457) $(190,194) $(86,263)

26
  Year ended    
  December 31,
2018
  December 31,
2017
  Increase/
(Decrease)
 
Current Assets $45,447  $33,156  $12,291 
Current Liabilities $6,371,092  $3,525,534  $2,845,558 
Working Capital Deficit $(6,325,645) $(3,492,378) $2,833,267 

  

As of December 31, 2015,2018, we had a working capital deficit of $276,457$6,325,645, as compared to a working capital deficit of $190,194$3,492,378 as of December 31, 2014,2017, an increase of $86,263.$2,833,267. During the year ended December 31, 20152018 we received net proceeds of $1,248,512$362,887 from the issuance of common stockconvertible notes and warrants and converted $91,162$670,270 from exercise of warrants, net with repayments of $39,941 of convertible debtnotes and accrued interest.officer loans. The Company used the proceeds to pay down debt and fund operations during the year. The decreaseincrease in our working capital deficit is primarily attributable to our historic negative cash flow from operations resulting in our growing accounts payable, accrued liabilities and accrued liabilities.outstanding debt.

 

We have incurred net operating losses and operating cash flow deficits since inception, continuing through the first quarter of 2016.inception. We have been funded primarily by a combination of equity issuances and debt, to execute on our business plan and for working capital.Our principal source of liquidity is our cash.At December 31, 2015,2018, we had cash totaling approximately $1,300.$26,000. We believe our existing available cash is insufficient to enable the Company to meet the working capital requirements for the near future. Consequently, we will be required to raise additional capital to complete the development and commercialization of our current product. However, there can be no assurance that we will be able to raise additional capital on terms acceptable to us, or at all. In order to boost sales, we continue to explore potential expansion opportunities in the industry through mergers and acquisitions, enhancement of our existing products, development of new products and expansion into other international markets. We will incur increased costs as a result of being a public company, which could affect our profitability and operating results.

13

 

We are obligated to file annual, quarterly and current reports with the SEC pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”). In addition, the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (“Sarbanes-Oxley”) and the rules subsequently implemented by the SEC and the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board have imposed various requirements on public companies, including requiring changes in corporate governance practices. We expect these rules and regulations to increase our legal and financial compliance costs and to make some activities of ours more time-consuming and costly. We expect to spend between $200,000 and $250,000 in legal and accounting expenses annually to comply with our reporting obligations and Sarbanes-Oxley. These costs could affect profitability and our results of operations.

 

Management has determined that additional capital will be required in the form of equity or debt securities. In addition, if we cannot raise additional short term capital we will be forced to continue to further accrue liabilities due to our limited cash reserves. There are no assurances that management will be able to raise capital on terms acceptable to the Company. If we are unable to obtain sufficient amounts of additional capital, we may be required to reduce the scope of our planned development, which could harm our business, financial condition and operating results. If we obtain additional funds by selling any of our equity securities or by issuing common stock to pay current or future obligations, the percentage ownership of our stockholders will be reduced, stockholders may experience additional dilution, or the equity securities may have rights preferences or privileges senior to the common stock. If adequate funds are not available to us when needed on satisfactory terms, we may be required to cease operating or otherwise modify our business strategy.

 

Going Concern and Management’s Liquidity Plans

 

As reflected in the consolidated financial statements, the Company had an accumulated deficit at December 31, 2015,2018, a net loss and net cash used in operating activities for the year then ended and has generated only minimal revenues since inception. These factors raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern.concern within one year from the issuance date of the consolidated financial statements.

 

The ability of the Company to continue its operations is dependent on management’s plans, which include the raising of capital through debt and/or equity markets, with some additional funding from other traditional financing sources, including term notes, until such time that funds provided by operations are sufficient to fund working capital requirements. The Company may need to incur additional liabilities with certain related parties to sustain the Company’s existence. There can be no assurance that the Company will be able to raise any additional capital.

 

The Company may also require additional funding to finance the growth of our anticipated future operations as well as to achieve its strategic objectives. There can be no assurance that financing will be available in amounts or terms acceptable to the Company, if at all. In that event, the Company would be required to change its growth strategy and seek funding on that basis, if at all.

 

The Company’s plan regarding these matters is to raise additional debt and/or equity financing to allow the Company the ability to cover its current cash flow requirements and meet its obligations as they become due. There can be no assurances that financing will be available or if available, that such financing will be available under favorable terms. In the event that the Company is unable to generate adequate revenues to cover expenses and cannot obtain additional financing in the near future, the Company may seek protection under bankruptcy laws. The accompanying financial statements have been prepared on a going concern basis, which contemplates the realization of assets and the satisfaction of liabilities in the normal course of business. These financial statements do not include any adjustments relating to the recovery of the recorded assets or the classification of the liabilities that might be necessary should the Company be unable to continue as a going concern.

 

The spread of a novel strain of coronavirus (COVID-19) around the world in the first half of 2020 has caused significant volatility in U.S. and international markets. There is significant uncertainty around the breadth and duration of business disruptions related to COVID-19, as well as its impact on the U.S. and international economies. The outbreak and any preventative or protective actions that governments or we may take in respect of this COVID-19 may result in a period of business disruption, reduced customer traffic and reduced operations. Any resulting financial impact cannot be reasonably estimated at this time but may materially affect our business, financial condition, and results of operations. The extent to which the COVID-19 impacts our results will depend on future developments, which are highly uncertain and cannot be predicted, including new information which may emerge concerning the severity of the COVID-19 and the actions to contain the COVID-19 or treat its impact, among others.

 2714 

 

Share Exchange Transaction

On August 14, 2015 (the “Closing Date”), we and the shareholders of PeerLogix Delaware entered into a Share Exchange Agreement.

Pursuant to the Share Exchange Agreement, on the Closing Date, all of the shareholders of PeerLogix Delaware exchanged all of their shares of common stock of PeerLogix Delaware for newly issued shares of our common stock (the “Share Exchange”). Pursuant to the Share Exchange, PeerLogix Delaware became our wholly-owned subsidiary, which we continue to utilize for our business operations.

Simultaneously with the Share Exchange, on the Closing Date all of the issued and outstanding options and warrants to purchase shares of PeerLogix Delaware’s common stock were exchanged, respectively, into options (the “New Options”) and warrants (the “New Warrants”) to purchase shares of our common stock. The number of shares of our common stock issuable under, and the price per share upon exercise of, the New Options and the New Warrants were the same as those of the original options and warrants of PeerLogix Delaware, as a result of a 1 for 1 exchange ratio of securities pursuant to the Share Exchange, which is described in the Share Exchange Agreement. The New Options will be administered under the Company’s 2015 Equity Incentive Plan, which the Company assumed and adopted on the Closing Date in connection with the Share Exchange.

A copy of the Share Exchange Agreement was attached as Exhibit 2.1 to a Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on August 17, 2015 and is incorporated herein by reference.

 

Financing Transactions

 

During February and March 2015 (“Offering 1”), the Companyyear ended December 31, 2018, we sold $500,000 of units$425,900 Units to investors. Each unitUnit was sold at a price of $0.50$10,000 per unitUnit and consisted of one (1) share of common stock, par value $0.001 per share, and one (1) warrant entitling the holder to purchase one share of common stock forsix (6) month, 18% convertible promissory note (36% on an annual basis) with a five-year period at an exercise price of $0.60 per share. An aggregate of 1,000,000 shares and 1,000,000 warrants were issued to such investors. The placement agent received as compensation for its services $50,000 (10% commission) and warrants to purchase 50,000 units at a price of $0.01 per unit, with each unit consisting of one share of common stock and one warrant to purchase a share of common stock at a price of $0.60 per share. Theface value of the$10,000 and four year warrants was a direct cost of the private placement and has been recorded as an increase and decrease to additional paid in capital. In addition, the Company incurred legal and other miscellaneous costs in the amount of $14,263 related to the transaction, which were offset against equity.

During August and September 2015 (“Offering 2”), the Company sold 1,683,333 units at a price of $0.60 per unit. Each unit consists of one share of Common Stock and a warrant to purchase one share of Common Stock. The warrants (the “Investor Warrants”) are exercisable for a periodan aggregate number of five years at a purchase price of $0.72 per share of Common Stock. The investors in the closing collectively purchased 1,683,333 Units for total cash consideration of $1,010,000. The placement agent received as compensation for its services $101,000 (10% commission) and warrants to purchase 168,333 units at a price of $0.60 per unit, with each unit consisting of one share of common stock and one warrant to purchase a share of common stock at a price of $0.60 per share. The placement agent warrants are exercisable for a period of five years. The value of the warrants was a direct cost of the private placement and has been recorded as an increase and decrease to additional paid in capital. The placement agent also received payment of a 3% non-accountable expense allowance in the amount of $30,300. In addition the Company incurred legal and other miscellaneous costs in the amount of approximately $66,000 related to the transaction, which were offset against equity.

All of the securities issued in connection with Offering 1, Offering 2 and the Share Exchange (collectively the “Transactions”) are “restricted securities,” and as such are subject to all applicable restrictions specified by federal and state securities laws. In connection with Offering 1, Offering 2 and the Share Exchange, the Company entered into registration rights agreements with all of its shareholders. Under the terms of the registration rights agreements, the Company has committed to file a registration statement covering the resale of (i) all shares of common stock outstanding as of August 14, 2015, the closing date of the Share Exchange; (ii) allequal to 50% of the shares of common stock underlyinginto which the Investor Warrants in Offering 2 andNote is initially convertible, exercisable at a price of $0.10 per share. The Offerings Notes are due six months after the warrants that were included inissuance of each note, as amended.

Each of the Notes is convertible at an initial price equal to $0.06 per share. In addition, during the two month period commencing on each issuance of the Offering 1 units; (iii) all3 Notes, as amended, the Notes will contain a look-back provision pursuant to which the Notes will be convertible at the lower of $0.06 per share or the lowest volume weighted average price of the shares issuable upon exercise of the placement agent warrants (and the shares underlying the warrants issuable upon exercise of such placement agent warrants) issued in Offering 1 and Offering 2 within 60 days from August 14, 2015 (the “Filing Deadline”), and shall use commercially reasonable efforts to cause the registration statement to become effective no later than 90 days after it is filed (the “Effective Deadline”).

28

The Company has agreed to use reasonable efforts to maintain the effectiveness of the registration statement through the one year anniversary of the date the registration statement is declared effective by the SEC, or until Rule 144 of the Securities Act is available to investors in the Offerings with respect to all of their shares, whichever is earlier.

The holders of any registrable securities removed from the Registration Statement a result of a Rule 415 or other comment from the SEC shall have “piggyback” registration rights for the shares of Common Stock or Common Stock underlying such warrants with respect to any registration statement filed by the Company following the effectiveness of the registration statement which would permit the inclusion of these shares. As of the date of the filing of this report the registration statement has not been filed. The registration rights agreements do not contain a penalty clause for the failure to file a registration statement within the period agreed upon. However, we do not exclude the possibility that our shareholders may bring litigations against us in connection with claims arising out of our failure to file a registration statement pursuant to the registration rights agreements and seek remedies under the common law.

On January 28, 2016, the Company entered into a Securities Purchase Agreement (“SPA”), Promissory Note (the “January Note”) and Registration Rights Agreement (“RRA”) (collectively, the “Transaction Documents”) with Pinewood Trading Fund, L.P. (“Pinewood”). Pursuant to the SPA, the Company sold 100,000 shares (the “Shares”) of itsCompany’s common stock (the “Common Stock”), in exchange for Pinewood lending $105,000 (“Funding Amount”“VWAP”) to the Company pursuant to the Note with a principal amount of $131,250 (“Principal Amount”). The January Note is due on July 28, 2016 or earlierduring any 10 day period during such two (2) month period, provided however, in the event that the gross proceeds ofVWAP during any Company offering equals or exceeds $300,000.The January Notesuch ten (10) day period is secured by all assetsless than $0.06 per share, then the reset conversion price of the Company.

UnderNotes shall be no lower than $0.03. The Notes also contain a reset provision to the termssame price as any future offering over the lifetime of the RRA with Pinewood,Notes in the Company committed to file a registration statement onevent that the conversion or prior to March 31, 2016 or any additional registration statements which may be required pursuant tooffering price of securities offered in such subsequent offering is less the termsConversion Price of the RRA on or prior toNotes in this Offering. Notwithstanding the earliest practical date (“Filing Date”), covering, among other things,foregoing, in no event shall the resale of all or such portion (as permitted by SEC Guidance and Rule 415) of all of the Shares and any shares of Common Stock issued or issuable upon any stock split, dividend or other distribution, recapitalization or similar event with respect to the Shares (the “Registrable Securities”) on such Filing Date that are not then registered on an effective registration statement. The Company has agreed to use its commercially reasonable best efforts to cause the registration statement toConversion Price be declared effective under the Securities Act as promptly as practicable after the filing thereof, and use its commercially reasonable best efforts to keep such registration statement continuously effective under the Securities Act until all Registrable Securities covered by such registration statement have been sold, or may be sold without volume restrictions pursuant to Rule 144, as determined by the counsel to the Company pursuant to a written opinion letter to such effect, addressed and acceptable to the Company’s transfer agent and Pinewood (the “Effectiveness Period”).

If the Company fails to file the registration statement on or prior to the Filing Date, or fails to maintain the effectiveness of the registration statement pursuant to the terms of the RRA, the Company may be subject to partial cash liquidated damages, and not as a penalty, equal to $2,500lower than $0.03 per month (not to exceed an aggregate of $20,000), pro-rated for periods of less than 30 days. If the Company fails to pay any partial liquidated damages in full within seven (7) days after the date payable, the Company will pay interest thereon at a rate of 18% per annum (or such lesser maximum amount that is permitted to be paid by applicable law) to Pinewood, accruing daily from the date such partial liquidated damages are due until such amounts, plus all such interest thereon, are paid in full. As of the date of the filing of this report, the registration statement has not been filed.

On April 8, 2016 (the “Initial Closing Date”), we entered into a Securities Purchase Agreement (the “Agreement”) with Attia Investments, LLC, a related party (the “Investor”). A shareholder of the Company who owns in-excess of 5% of the Company’s common stock is the managing member of Attia Investments, LLC. Under the Agreement, the Investor agreed to purchase senior secured convertible debentures in the aggregate principal amount of up to $125,000 (together the “Debentures” and each individual issuance a “Debenture”), bearing interest at a rate of 0% per annum, with maturity on October 8, 2016, extended to April 8, 2017 at the discretion of the Investor. The principal amount of the Debentures shall equal the amount funded by the Investor together with an original issue discount of 20%. The Debentures are secured by all assets of the Company.

On the Initial Closing Date, we issued and sold to the Investor, and the Investor purchased from us, a first Debenture in the principal amount of $68,750 for a purchase price of $55,000. $13,750 was recorded as an original issue discount and will be accreted over the life of the note to interest expense.

29

The principal amount of the Debentures can be converted at the option of the Investor into shares of our common stock at a conversion price per share of the lower of (i) $0.05 or (ii) the price per share in an offering of securities prior to the maturity date. In order to induce Investors to invest in the Debentures, the Investors will be issued two shares of Company common stock for each $1.00 invested.

The Agreement provides that, the shares of Company common stock and stock options held by William Gorfein, CEO and Joshua Partridge, COO (the “Founders Shares”), together with medallion guaranteed stock powers relating thereto, shall be placed into an escrow account established by the Investor and shall be held pending a determination by the Board of Directors, in consultation with the Investor, of the status of the operations of the Company. Within 45 days following the Initial Closing Date the Company shall deliver to the escrow agent a written notice which shall state that the board of directors of the Company, in consultation and agreement with the Investor, have made one of the following determinations:

(a)adequate funding, on terms and conditions acceptable to both the Company and the Investor, is made available to the Company and is sufficient to ensure that the Company can execute its business plan; or
(b)such funding is not available to the Company, in which case the Company intends to structure a transaction as a result of which either (i) the shares of the Company and a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company, and the operations thereof shall be returned to the CEO and COO and the Founders Shares shall be cancelled, but the Company shall be entitled to a 10% royalty on sales generated by such operation for five years or (ii) the operations thereof shall be sold to a third party, and the CEO and COO shall become employees thereof or, if not so employed, the unemployed individual shall accept from the Company a cash payment in lieu of such employment equal to $25,000.

The Company can give no assurance that such funding will be available on terms and conditions acceptable to both the Company and the Investor, or at all.share.

 

Summary Cash flows for the years ended December 31, 20152018 and 2014:2017:

 

 Year Ended  Year Ended 
 December 31,
2015
 December 31,
2014
  December 31,
2018
 December 31,
2017
 
Net cash used in operating activities $(1,198,829) $(148,950) $(980,925) $(725,243)
Net cash used in investing activities $  $(37,500)
Net cash provided by financing activities $1,190,078  $154,093  $993,216  $720,807 

 

Cash Used in Operating Activities

 

Our primary uses of cash from operating activities include payments to consultants for research and development, compensation and related costs, legal and professional fees, computer and internet expenses and other general corporate expenditures.

 

Cash used in operating activities consistin 2018 consisted of net loss adjusted for certain non-cash items primarilysuch as equity-based compensation expense during 2015 and 2014,of $2,606,982, fair value of warrants issued in connection with note extensions, inducement expense of $734,273, fair value of warrants for services, amortization of debt discounts of $703,544, non-cash interest of $111,606, loss on extinguishment of debt of $140,022, loss on change in fair value of derivative liabilities of $1,547,402, as well as the effect of changes in working capital and other activities.

 

The adjustmentsCash Used in Investing Activities

No cash used in investing activities for the non-cash items increased from the year ended December 31, 20142018 as compared to the year ended December 31, 2015 due primarily to an increase in equity-based compensation. In addition, the net increase in cash from changes in working capital activities from the year ended December 31, 2014 to the year ended December 31, 2015 primarily consisted of an increase in accounts payable and accrued expenses primarily due to an increase in accrued payroll and payroll related expenses, accrued legal fees related to merger activities, accrued accounting and auditing fees and accrued consulting fees related to research and development expenses, business development, financial advisory services and investor relations. These increases in cash from changes in working capital activities are offset by an increase in prepaid insurance expense.$37,500 for 2017.

 

Cash Provided by Financing Activities

 

Cash provided by financing activities consists primarily of net proceeds from issuance or repayments of notes payable, convertible promissory notes related party loans and proceeds fromwarrant exercises for the issuance of common stock and warrants of the Company.year ended December 31, 2018.

15

 

Cash provided by financing activities increased from the year ended December 31, 20142017 to the year ended December 31, 2015,2018, primarily driven by an increase in proceeds from the issuance of common stockconvertible notes and warrants exercises offset by the repayment of notes payable and related party loans.

30

     

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

 

See Note 3 to the consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this Filing.

 

Critical Accounting Policies

 

Our financial statements and related public financial information are based on the application of accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (“U.S. GAAP”). U.S. GAAP requires the use of estimates; assumptions, judgments and subjective interpretations of accounting principles that have an impact on the assets, liabilities, revenues and expense amounts reported. These estimates can also affect supplemental information contained in our external disclosures including information regarding contingencies, risk and financial condition. We believe our use of estimates and underlying accounting assumptions adhere to U.S. GAAP and are consistently and conservatively applied. We base our estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances. Actual results may differ materially from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions. We continue to monitor significant estimates made during the preparation of our financial statements.

 

Our significant accounting policies are summarized in Note 3 of our consolidated financial statements. While all these significant accounting policies impact our financial condition and results of operations, we view certain of these policies as critical. Policies determined to be critical are those policies that have the most significant impact on our financial statements and require management to use a greater degree of judgment and estimates. Actual results may differ from those estimates. Our management believes that given current facts and circumstances, it is unlikely that applying any other reasonable judgments or estimate methodologies would cause effect on our consolidated results of operations, financial position or liquidity for the periods presented in this report.

 

We believe the following critical accounting policies and procedures, among others, affect our more significant judgments and estimates used in the preparation of our consolidated financial statements:

 

Use of Estimates

 

The preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the period. Actual results could differ from these estimates. The Company’s significant estimates and assumptions include the fair value of the Company’s equity instruments, convertible debt, stock-based compensation, and the valuation allowance relating to the Company’s deferred tax assets.

 

Accounting for Warrants

 

The Company accounts for the issuance of common stock purchase warrants issued in connection with debt and equity offerings in accordance with the provisions of ASC 815, Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities (“ASC 815”). The Company classifies as equity any contracts that (i) require physical settlement or net-share settlement or (ii) gives the Company a choice of net-cash settlement or settlement in its own shares (physical settlement or net-share settlement). The Company classifies as assets or liabilities any contracts that (i) require net-cash settlement (including a requirement to net-cash settle the contract if an event occurs and if that event is outside the control of the Company) or (ii) gives the counterparty a choice of net-cash settlement or settlement in shares (physical settlement or net-share settlement).

 

16

The Company assessed the classification of its common stock purchase warrants as of the date of each equity offering and determined that such instruments met the criteria for equity classification, as the settlement terms indicate that the instruments are indexed to the entity’s underlying stock.

 

Derivative Instrument Liability

The Company accounts for derivative instruments in accordance with ASC 815, which establishes accounting and reporting standards for derivative instruments and hedging activities, including certain derivative instruments embedded in other financial instruments or contracts and requires recognition of all derivatives on the balance sheet at fair value, regardless of hedging relationship designation. Accounting for changes in fair value of the derivative instruments depends on whether the derivatives qualify as hedge relationships and the types of relationships designated are based on the exposures hedged. At December 31, 2018 and 2017, the Company did not have any derivative instruments that were designated as hedges.

Off Balance Sheet Arrangements:

 

We do not have any off-balance sheet arrangements, financings, or other relationships with unconsolidated entities or other persons, also known as “special purpose entities” (SPEs).

31

     

Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.

 

This item is not required for a smaller reporting company.

Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.

 

Our consolidated financial statements and corresponding notes thereto called for by this item appear at the end of this document commencing on page F-1.

Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure.

 

On August 14, 2015, we engaged Marcum LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm, and effective August 14, 2015, we dismissed Scrudato & Co., PA (“Scrudato”), as our independent registered public accounting firm. The decision to dismiss Scrudato and to appoint Marcum LLP was approved by our board of directors.None.

Scrudato’s report on our financial statements for either of the two most recent fiscal years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013 did not contain an adverse opinion or disclaimer of opinion, or qualification or modification as to uncertainty, audit scope, or accounting principles, except that such report on our financial statements contained an explanatory paragraph in respect to the substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern.

During our two most recent fiscal years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013 and in the subsequent interim period through the date of dismissal, there were no disagreements, resolved or not, with Scrudato on any matter of accounting principles or practices, financial statement disclosure, or audit scope and procedures, which disagreement(s), if not resolved to the satisfaction of Scrudato, would have caused Scrudato to make reference to the subject matter of the disagreement(s) in connection with its report. During our two most recent fiscal years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013 and in the subsequent interim period through the date of dismissal, there were no reportable events as described in Item 304(a)(1)(v) of Regulation S-K.

We provided Scrudato with a copy of the disclosure in this Item 9 of this Report prior to its filing with the SEC, and requested that it furnish us with a letter addressed to the Securities and Exchange Commission stating whether it agrees with the statements made in this Item 9, and if not, stating the respects with which it does not agree. A copy of the letter provided from Scrudato is filed as Exhibit 16.1 to this Report.

During our two most recent fiscal years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013 and in the subsequent interim period through the date of appointment, we have not consulted with Marcum LLP regarding either the application of accounting principles to a specified transaction, either completed or proposed, or the type of audit opinion that might be rendered on our financial statements, nor has Marcum LLP provided to us a written report or oral advice that Marcum LLP concluded was an important factor considered by us in reaching a decision as to the accounting, auditing or financial reporting issue. In addition, during such periods, we have not consulted with Marcum LLP regarding any matter that was either the subject of a disagreement (as defined in Item 304(a)(1)(iv) and the related instructions) or a reportable event (as described in Item 304(a)(1)(v) of Regulation S-K).

32

   

Item 9A. Controls and Procedures.

 

(a) Evaluation of Disclosure and Control Procedures

 

Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our principal executive officer and the principal financial officer, we have conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures, as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based on this evaluation, our principal executive officer and principal financial officer concluded as of the evaluation date that our disclosure controls and procedures were not effective to ensure that the material information required to be included in our Securities and Exchange Commission reports is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our principal executive and financial officer, recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in Securities and Exchange Commission rules and forms relating to our company, particularly during the period when this report was being prepared.

17

 

(b) Management's Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

 

This Company’s management is responsible for establishing and maintaining internal controls over financial reporting and disclosure controls. Internal control over financial reporting is a process designed by, or under the supervision of, the Company’s principal executive officer and principal financial officer, or persons performing similar functions, and effected by the board of directors, management and other personnel, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and includes those policies and procedures that:

 

(1)Pertain to the maintenance of records that in reasonable detail accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the issuer;
  
(2)Provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the issuer are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the registrant; and
  
(3)Provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of the issuer’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

 

Disclosure controls and procedures are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in reports filed under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, is appropriately recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the specified time periods.

 

Management has conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2015,2018, based on the framework established in Internal Control-Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission in 2013 (“COSO”).

 

Based on this assessment, management concluded that as of the period covered by this Annual Report on Form 10-K, it had material weaknesses in its internal control procedures.

 

33

As of period covered by this Annual Report on Form 10-K, we have concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was ineffective. The Company’s assessment identified certain material weaknesses which are set forth below:

Based on this assessment, management concluded that as of the period covered by this Annual Report on Form 10-K, it had material weaknesses in its ability to file timely due to limited financial and personnel resources .

 

Functional Controls and Segregation of Duties

 

Because of the Company’s limited resources, there are limited controls over information processing.

 

There is an inadequate segregation of duties consistent with control objectives. Our Company’s management is composed of a small number of individuals resulting in a situation where limitations on segregation of duties exist. In order to remedy this situation, we would need to hire additional staff to provide greater segregation of duties. Currently, it is not feasible to hire additional staff to obtain optimal segregation of duties. Management will reassess this matter in the following year to determine whether improvement in segregation of duty is feasible. 

 

Accordingly, as the result of identifying the above material weakness we have concluded that these control deficiencies resulted in a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of the annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis by the Company’s internal controls.

 

18

Management believes that the material weaknesses set forth above were the result of the scale of our operations and are intrinsic to our small size. Management believes these weaknesses did not have a material effect on our financial results and intends to take remedial actions upon receiving funding for the Company’s business operations. The Company intends to hire additional members of upper management to traditionally segregate duties upon receiving sufficient funding to do so.

 

This annual report does not include an attestation report of our registered public accounting firm regarding internal control over financial reporting. Management’s report was not subject to attestation by our registered public accounting firm pursuant to temporary rules of the SEC that permit the Company to provide only management’s report herein.

 

(c) Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

 

There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting, as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act, during our most recently completed fiscal quarter that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

 

Item 9B. Other Information.

 

Not applicable.

 

 3419 

 

PART III

 

Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance.

 

As of December 31, 2015,2018, our executive officers and directors were as follows:

 

NameAgePosition
William Gorfein

Ray Colwell

28

53

Chief Executive Officer and Director

Joshua PartridgeWilliam Gorfein2931Chief OperatingPrincipal Financial Officer Secretary &and Director
Charles Gonsher29Chief Accounting Officer

Timothy Askew

66

Director

Kevin Richardson4750Director

 

Ray Colwell – CEO

On February 21, 2017, the Company entered into an employment agreement with Ray Colwell (“Colwell”), pursuant to which, commencing March 6, 2017, Colwell will serve as the Chief Executive Officer of the Company through March 5, 2019, subject to extension as provided in the employment agreement, and be appointed to the Board of Directors.

Prior to joining PeerLogix, Colwell served as a member of successful executive teams, most recently as VP of Partner Sales at AOL responsible for $100+ million of mobile demand revenue following the AOL acquisition of Millennial Media, where he was then head of Global Business Development, and prior to the acquisition of Nexage by Millennial Media in the same capacity. Colwell has deep experience generating digital media revenue in new businesses in the digital ecosystem, including his role as Chief Revenue Officer at Adelphic, recently acquired by Time Inc., and as Chief Revenue Officer of 4INFO, as well as SVP of Sales and BD for Third Screen Media, a pioneer in the mobile ad serving space acquired by AOL in 2007.

On November 26, 2019, Colwell resigned as Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”) of PeerLogix, Inc. (the “Company”). Mr. Colwell’s resignation as the CEO was not a result of any disagreements with the Company regarding its the operations, policies or practices. On November 26, 2019 Mr. Gorfein assumed the role of CEO.

William Gorfein – CEO, Founder of PeerLogix and Director

 

Mr. Gorfein’s leadership has spanned multiple organizations as he has provided services to companies and clients while functioning in both information technology and financially based roles. Most recently before cofounding PeerLogix, he was the lead solutions engineer for BreezeIT, a subsidiary of Core 3 Technologies in Orange County, CA. While in this capacity, Mr. Gorfein was responsible for overseeing the budget and managing the technical and implementation requirements for the majority of datacenter equipment and architectures sold to customers from the small business to the enterprise level. With over a decade of software and hardware development experience, Mr. Gorfein has developed extensive expertise in the areas of platform development, life-cycle management and server architecture.

 

Previously the technical lead of two major software initiatives, Mr. Gorfein oversaw the development and implementation of content monitoring software for a rights management group based in Los Angeles, and he has worked on independent software projects relating to O.C.R. (optical character recognition) and employee time management. Mr. Gorfein has hand-picked and managed multiple development teams and has led cross continent collaborations in Egypt, India and China.

 

Mr. Gorfein’s is experienced in understanding the underlying macro-conditions driving enterprises to adopt Information Technology, and successfully taking advantage of these trends through foresight, creativity and resource management abilities. He received his Bachelor’s degree with a focus on Economy and Industry from the University of Arizona in Tucson, AZ.

 

Joshua Partridge – Chief Operating Officer, Founder of PeerLogix and Director

 

In 2008, Mr. Partridge began working for Arsenal Pictures, a boutique international sales agency for motion pictures located in Los Angeles, CA. While in this role, he handled acquisitions and sales, as well as the majority of day-to-day operations, helping the firm achieve greater international and domestic sales distribution. After three years of serving in this role and experiencing the dramatic shift occurring within the Entertainment Industry’s global distribution channels, he began independently consulting for clients in the areas of technology, management and business development. Mr. Partridge was contracted to counsel both content producers and law firms on their media protection strategies, as well as production consulting, quality control, revenue projections and investor relations for television and film companies.

In 2012, Mr. Partridge partnered with William Gorfein to form PeerLogix with the goal of helping organizations in a multitude of industries gain deeper understanding of their consumers and audience base. Mr. Partridge was our Secretary and a Director since inception as well as our Head of Business Development. On September 10, 2015 our Board of Directors appointed Mr. Partridge to the position of Chief Operating Officer. He received his Bachelor of Science degree in Regional Development with a focus on economic growth from the University of Arizona in Tucson, AZ.

Charles Gonsher – Chief Accounting Officer

From 2013 to August 2015, Mr. Gonsher served as Group Finance Manager at Google Ventures, where he managed a team of analysts in geocommerce financial operations activity for the purposes of seed, growth and venture funding on behalf of Google’s investments in technology startups across the United States and internationally. From 2011 to 2013, he was a financial advisor at Waddell & Reed, and from 2009 to 2011 was an enrolled agent at 20/20 Financial Consulting, Inc. Mr. Gonsher holds a BS in Accounting and Finance from University of Colorado at Boulder.

Timothy Askew – Director

Timothy Askew is the Founder and CEO of Corporate Rain International, the elite international sales outsourcing boutique and consulting firm.  He writes a popular weekly column for Inc. Magazine and is the author of the recently publishedThe Poetry of Small Business.  Mr. Askew is a founding member of the Inc. Business Owner's Council and sits on the board of the Darien Theatre.  He has produced for Broadway, as well appearing on Broadway as an actor.

Mr. Askew has a BA in History and an MA in Philosophy and Religion from Emory University in Atlanta, Georgia.  He also has an MA in Education from Claremont Graduate School in California.  He has served on the Small Business Advisory Council for the State of New York. Mr. Askew frequently mentors fledgling entrepreneurs in New York and nationally.

 

 3520 

 

Kevin Richardson – Director

 

Mr. Richardson, age 47,48, is currently Chairman of the board of directors of SANUWAVE Health, Inc. since August 2005. Mr. Richardson founded Prides Capital LLC and Prides Capital Partners LLC in January 2004 where he is Managing Director. Prides Capital LLC and Prides Capital Partners LLC specialize in strategic block, active investing in small-cap and micro-cap public and private companies. From April 1999 until the end of 2003, Mr. Richardson was a partner at Blum Capital Partners, a $2.5 billion investment firm. Between May 1999 and September 2003, Mr. Richardson was the lead public partner on 18 investments. Prior to joining Blum Capital, Mr. Richardson was an analyst at Tudor Investment Corporation, an investment management firm.

 

Previously, Mr. Richardson spent four years at Fidelity Management and Research where he was the assistant portfolio manager of the Fidelity Contra Fund, a registered investment company. Mr. Richardson also managed Fidelity Airline Fund, the Fidelity Aerospace and Defense Fund, and performed research and analysis in a variety of industry sectors (computer services, business services, media, financial services, and healthcare information technology). Mr. Richardson is also a member of the board of directors of As Seen On TV, Inc., a publicly traded multichannel distributor of As Seen On TV products and Pegasus Solutions, Inc., a travel technology company and was previously a board member of Healthtronics, Inc. and QC Holdings, Inc. Mr. Richardson received an undergraduate degree from Babson College and an M.B.A. from Kenan-Flagler Business School at the University of North Carolina.

 

Board Committees

 

The Company does not intend to maintain a board of directors that is composed of a majority of “independent” directors. The Company does not expect to appoint an audit committee, nominating committee and/or compensation committee, or to adopt charters relative to each such committees as at the date of this Report, but may adopt such charters and appoint such committees in the future.

 

Item 11. Executive Compensation

 

The following table sets forth information regarding each element of compensation that was paid or awarded to the named executive officers of the Company for the periods indicated.

 

Name and Principal PositionYear

Salary

($)

Bonus

($)

Stock

Awards

($)

Option

Awards

($)

Non-Equity

Incentive

Plan

Compensation

($)

All Other Compensation

($)

Total

($)

William Gorfein2015$121,301$0    $121,301
(CEO and director (1)2014$23,952$0    $23,952
         
Joshua Partridge2015$77,851$0    $77,851
(COO, Secretary and director)2014$2,100$0    $2,100
        
Charles Gonsher2015$33,808$0    $33,808
(CAO) (4)        
         
Steven Allen Friedman2015$0$0    $0
(Former CEO anddirector) (5)2014$0$0    $0
        
Jay Lasky2015$0$0    $0
(Former CEO and director)(6)        

Name and Principal Position Year 

Salary

($)

  

Bonus

($)

   Stock Awards ($)  

Total

($)

 
Ray Colwell (1)(6) 2018 $192,307    (2) $1,702,637  $1,894,944 
  2017 $173,356    (3) $409,059  $582,415 
                    
William Gorfein 2018 $117,790    (5) $1,791,169  $1,908,959 
Principal Financial Officer and director (4) 2017            

 

(1)

Mr. Colwell was appointed on February 21, 2017.

(2)On December 5, 2018, Mr. Colwell was granted 20,000,000 options to purchase the Company’s common stock at $0.09 per share and expiring 10 years from issuance. 10,000,000 options vest upon issuance, 5,000,000 options vest on May 1, 2019 and 5,000,000 vest on December 1, 2019.
(3)On March 6, 2017, Mr. Colwell was granted 7,000,000 options to purchase the Company’s common stock at $0.11 per share and expiring 10 years from issuance. 1,000,000 options vest upon issuance with the remainder with defined market conditions. On December 5, 2018 all 7,000,000 options were cancelled.
(4)Mr. Gorfein was appointed Chief Executive Officer and Director on August 13, 2015. Mr. Gorfein was appointed CEO on November 26, 2019.
(5)On December 5, 2018, Mr. Gorfein was granted 20,000,000 options to purchase the Company’s common stock at $0.09 per share and expiring 10 years from issuance. 10,000,000 options vest upon issuance, 5,000,000 options vest on May 1, 2019 and 5,000,000 vest on December 1, 2019. On December 5, 2018 all of the previously issued 9,000,000 options were cancelled. On July 9, 2019, Mr. Gorfein was granted 30,000,000 options to purchase the Company’s common stock at $0.05 per share and expiring 10 years from issuance. 15,000,000 options vest upon issuance, 7,500,000 vest on January 9, 2021 and 7,500,000 vest on July 9, 2021. On July 9, 2019 all of the above previously issued 20,000,000 options were cancelled.
(6)On November 26, 2019, Mr. Colwell resigned as CEO of the Company.

 

(2)Mr. Partridge was appointed Chief Operating Officer on September 10, 2015.

 

(3)Mr. Partridge was appointed Director on August 13, 2015.

 

(4)Mr. Gonsher was appointed Chief Accounting Officer on September 10, 2015. On February 18, 2016 Mr. Gonsher’s employment agreement was terminated.

(5)Mr. Friedman resigned as officer and director of the Company on April 13, 2015.

(6)Mr. Lasky served as officer and director of the Company from April 13, 2015 to August 14, 2015.

 

 3621 

 

Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End

 

The following table presents the outstanding equity awards held by each of the named executive officers as of the end of the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015.2018.

 

  Option Awards 
Name Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options Exercisable  Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options Unexercisable  Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Number of Securities Underlying Exercised Unearned Options  Option Exercise Price  Option Expiration Date 
William Gorfein (CEO) (1)     –      –      –      –      – 
Joshua Partridge (COO) (Secretary) (2)               

(1)Mr. Gorfein is to be granted options to acquire 300,000 shares of restricted stock of the Company, which shall be subject to, and vest over a period of three (3) years. The complete terms of the options have not been finalized as of the date of this filing. The Company expects to issue Mr. Gorfein the options during the second quarter of 2016.

(2)Mr. Partridge is to be granted options to acquire 300,000 shares of restricted stock of the Company, which shall be subject to, and vest over a period of three (3) years. The complete terms of the options have not been finalized as of the date of this filing. The Company expects to issue Mr. Partridge the options during the second quarter of 2016.
  Option Awards
Name Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options Exercisable Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options Unexercisable Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Number of Securities Underlying Exercised Unearned Options Option Exercise Price Option Expiration Date
William Gorfein (Principal Financial Officer) 10,000,000 10,000,000  $0.09 12/01/2028
Ray Colwell 10,000,000 10,000,000  $0.09 12/01/2028

 

Employment Agreements

 

On February 21, 2017, the Company entered into an employment agreement with Ray Colwell, pursuant to which, commencing March 6, 2017, Mr. Colwell will serve as the Chief Executive Officer of the Company through March 5, 2019. Mr. Colwell’s employment agreement will thereafter be extended for additional one-year periods unless the Company or the Executive gives six (6) months’ notice of the intention to terminate this Agreement. Mr. Colwell’s employment was subsequently extended to March 5, 2020 pursuant to the terms of the employment agreement. Mr. Colwell resigned as Chief Executive Officer on November 26, 2019. Mr. Colwell’s resignation was not a result of any disagreements with the Company regarding its operations, policies or practices.

Each of the other named executive officers executed employment agreements with the Company in August 2015, which was adopted by us upon closing of the Share Exchange.

 

Mr. Gorfein’s employment agreement is for a period of three (3) years, after which the agreement is renewable for one (1) year periods, unless the Company or Mr. Gorfein gives six (6) months’ notice of the intention to terminate the agreement. Mr. Gorfein receives a salary of $120,000 per year with annual increases of 10% per year. Mr. Gorfein may also receive an annual cash bonus in an amount to be determined by the Board of Directors.

 

Mr. Partridge’s employment agreement is for a period of three (3) years, after which the agreement is renewable for one (1) year periods, unless the Company or Mr. Partridge gives six (6) months’ notice of the intention to terminate the agreement. Mr. Partridge receives a salary of $120,000 per year with annual increases of 10% per year. Mr. Partridge may also receive an annual cash bonus in an amount to be determined by the Board of Directors.

Mr. Gorfein and Mr. Partridge are each to be granted options to acquire 300,000 shares of restricted stock of the Company, which shall vest over a period of three (3) years. The complete terms of the options have not been finalized as of the date of this filing. The Company expects to issue Mr. Gorfein and Mr. Partridge the options during the second quarter of 2016.

The Company agrees to promptly reimburse Mr. Gorfein and Mr. Partridge for all reasonable and necessary business expenses, including without limitation, telephone and other charges incurred by them on behalf of the Company. In addition, the Company has agreed to provide Mr. Gorfein and Mr. Partridge with health insurance.

On August 31, 2015, the Company entered into an employment agreement with Charles Gonsher as the Company’s Chief Accounting Officer. The agreement called for a two year term, an annual salary of $90,000 per annum. In addition, Mr. Gonsher will be granted an option to purchase 240,000 shares of the Company’s common stock. As of December 31, 2015 the terms of the options had not been finalized. On February 18, 2016, Mr. Gonsher’s employment agreement was terminated.

37

 

Limits on Liability and Indemnification

 

We provideThrough August 14, 2019, we provided directors and officers insurance for our current directors and officers.

22

 

Our certificate of incorporation eliminates the personal liability of our directors to the fullest extent permitted by law. The certificate of incorporation further provideprovides that the Company will indemnify its officers and directors to the fullest extent permitted by law. This indemnification covers at least negligence on the part of the indemnified parties. Insofar as indemnification for liabilities under the Securities Act may be permitted to our directors, officers, and controlling persons under the foregoing provisions or otherwise, we have been advised that in the opinion of the SEC such indemnification is against public policy as expressed in the Securities Act of 1933 and is therefore unenforceable.

 

Corporate Governance

 

The business and affairs of the Company are managed under the direction of our Board of Directors, which as of April 14, 2016,December 31, 2018, is comprised of Kevin Richardson, William Gorfein Joshua Partridge and Timothy Askew.Ray Colwell.

 

There have been no changes in any state law or other procedures by which security holders may recommend nominees to our board of directors.

 

Our Board of Directors does not currently have any committees, such as an audit committee or a compensation committee. However, the Board of Directors may establish such committees in the future, and will establish an audit committee and a compensation committee (and any other committees that are required) if the Company seeks to be listed on a national securities exchange.

 

Term of Office

 

Directors are appointed to hold office until the next annual general meeting of stockholders or until removed from office in accordance with our bylaws. Our officers are appointed by our Board and hold office until removed by our Board.

 

All officers and directors listed above will remain in office until the next annual meeting of our stockholders, and until their successors have been duly elected and qualified. Our bylaws provide that officers are appointed annually by our Board and each executive officer serves at the discretion of our Board.

 

Director Compensation

 

The Company does not pay members of its Board of Directors any cashfollowing table sets forth summary information concerning the total compensation and currently compensates the Board through the issuance of stock options. Nopaid to our non-employee directors received any compensation as such forduring the fiscal yearsyear ended December 31, 2015 and 2014.2018 for services to our company.

Name 

Fees Earned

or Paid in

Cash ($)

  

Equity

Awards ($)

  Total ($) 
Kevin Richardson $20,000  $713,221  (1) $733,221 
             

(1)On December 5, 2018, Mr. Richardson was granted 10,000,000 options to purchase the Company’s common stock at $0.09 per share and expiring 10 years from issuance. 5,000,000 options vest upon issuance, 2,500,000 options vest on May 1, 2019 and 2,500,000 vest on December 1, 2019. On July 9, 2020, the 10,000,000 options above were cancelled and Mr. Richardson was issued 20,000,000 options of which 10,000,000 were vested immediately and 5,000,000 as of 12/9/2020 and 5,000,000 as of 7/9/2021.

23

 

Director Independence

 

We use the definition of “independence” of The NASDAQ Stock Market to make this determination. NASDAQ Listing Rule 5605(a)(2) provides that an “independent director” is a person other than an officer or employee of the company or any other individual having a relationship, which, in the opinion of the Company’s Board, would interfere with the exercise of independent judgment in carrying out the responsibilities of a director. The NASDAQ listing rules provide that a director cannot be considered independent if:

 

·The director is, or at any time during the past three3 years was, an employee of the company;

·The director or a family member of the director accepted any compensation from the company in excess of $120,000 during any period of 12 consecutive months within the three years preceding the independence determination (subject to certain exclusions, including, among other things, compensation for board or board committee service);

·A family member of the director is, or at any time during the past three years was, an executive officer of the company;

·The director or a family member of the director is a partner in, controlling stockholder of, or an executive officer of an entity to which the company made, or from which the company received, payments in the current or any of the past three fiscal years that exceed 5% of the recipient’s consolidated gross revenue for that year or $200,000, whichever is greater (subject to certain exclusions);

·The director or a family member of the director is employed as an executive officer of an entity where, at any time during the past three years, any of the executive officers of the company served on the compensation committee of such other entity; or

·The director or a family member of the director is a current partner of the company’s outside auditor, or at any time during the past three years was a partner or employee of the company’s outside auditor, and who worked on the company’s audit.

 

Under such definitions, Mr. Richardson and Mr. Askew areis considered our independent directors.director.

38

  

Code of Business Conduct and Ethics Policy

 

We have not yet adopted a Code of Business Conduct and Ethics that applies to, among other persons, our principal executive officers, principal financial officer, principal accounting officer or controller, and persons performing similar functions.

 

Item 12.Security12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters

 

The following table shows the beneficial ownership of our Common Stock as of April 14, 2016December 18, 2020 held by (i) each person known to us to be the beneficial owner of more than five percent (5%) of our Common Stock; (ii) each director; (iii) each executive officer; and (iv) all directors and executive officers as a group.

 

Beneficial ownership is determined in accordance with the rules of the SEC, and generally includes voting power and/or investment power with respect to the securities held. Shares of Common Stock subject to options and warrants currently exercisable or which may become exercisable within 60 days of April 14, 2016August 21, 2020 are deemed outstanding and beneficially owned by the person holding such options or warrants for purposes of computing the number of shares and percentage beneficially owned by such person, but are not deemed outstanding for purposes of computing the percentage beneficially owned by any other person. Except as indicated in the footnotes to this table, the persons or entities named have sole voting and investment power with respect to all shares of our Common Stock shown as beneficially owned by them.

 

24

The following table assumes 23,345,03567,744,953 shares are outstanding as of April 14, 2016.December 18, 2020.

 

Unless otherwise indicated, the address of each beneficial holder of our Common Stock is our corporate address.

 

Name of Beneficial Owner Shares of Common Stock Beneficially Owned  % of Shares of Common Stock Beneficially Owned 
William Gorfein  6,662,042   28.54% 
Joshua Partridge  6,662,042   28.54% 
Kevin Richardson  Null     
Timothy Askew  125,002   * 
         
All directors, director appointees and executive officers as a group (4 persons)  13,449,086   57.61% 
         
5% or greater stockholder        
Offer Attia
217 Forest Avenue
New Rochelle, NY 10804
  1,199,822   5.14% 

Attia Investments, LLC (1) (2)

217 Forest Ave

New Rochelle, NY 10804

  1,512,500   6.12% 
GlaBro US Holdings, LLC (3)
700 White Plains
Suite 317
Scarsdale NY 10583
  1,166,350   5.00% 

Name of Beneficial Owner Shares of Common Stock Beneficially Owned   % of Shares of Common Stock Beneficially Owned 
William Gorfein  21,512,185 (1)  26% 
Kevin Richardson  10,000,000 (2)  12.86% 
          
All directors, director appointees and executive officers as a group (3 persons)  31,512,185    35.15% 
          
5% or greater stockholder         
Charles Merkel
PO Box 1388
Clarksdale, MS 38614
  10,148,750 (3)  20.07% 
          
GSB Holdings
14179 Laurel Trail
Wellington, FL 03314
  9,864,310 (4)  14.75% 
          
Gerald Quave
5214 Finisterre
Palm City, FL 32408
  6,985,625 (5)  13.93% 
          
J&N Investments
124 E 8th St
Lakewood, NJ 08701
  5,184,667 (6)  7.47% 
          
Francis Straw
32200 Cantlon Drive
Wadsworth, NV 89442
  9,983,000 (7)  13.57% 
          
Ann-Marie Giulietti
30 Arden Lane
Sands Point, NY 11050
  9,676,255 (8)  12.5% 
          
John Lahr  5,935,313 (9)  8.2% 
          
Barry Donner  5,534,125 (10)  7.72% 
          
Freeman Trust  5,495,417 (11)  7.62% 
          
Fredric Colman  5,072,460 (12)  7.11% 
          
Jelcada LP  5,022,710 (13)  7.02% 

 

__________

* Less than 1%

 

25

(1)The person having voting, dispositive or investment powers over Attia Investments, LLC is Offer Attia.
(2)Including 137,500Comprised of 6,512,185 shares of common stock and 1,375,000options to purchase 15,000,000 shares of common stock upon the conversionthat are currently exercisable within 60 days of notes held by Attia Investments, LLC.August 21, 2020.

(2)Comprised of options to purchase 10,000,000 shares of common stock that are currently exercisable or exercisable within 60 days of August 21, 2020.
 (3)The person having voting, dispositiveComprised of 6,000,000 shares of common stock, convertible notes that are currently convertible or investment powers over GlaBro US Holdings, LLC is Andrew Glashow.convertible within 60 days of August 21, 2020 and 2,288,333 shares of common stock and warrants to purchase 8,152,080 shares of common stock that are currently exercisable or exercisable within 60 days of August 21, 2020.
(4)Comprised of 3,375,000 shares of common stock, convertible notes that are currently convertible or convertible within 60 days of August 21, 2020 and 55,249,685 shares of common stock and warrants to purchase 2,189,807 shares of common stock that are currently exercisable or exercisable within 60 days of August 21, 2020.
(5)Comprised of 1,850,000 shares of common stock, convertible notes that are currently convertible or convertible within 60 days of August 21, 2020 and 3,692,500 shares of common stock and warrants to purchase 4,824,500 shares of common stock that are currently exercisable or exercisable within 60 days of August 21, 2020.
(6)Comprised of 1,000,000 shares of common stock, convertible notes that are currently convertible or convertible within 60 days of August 21, 2020 and 2,744,667 shares of common stock and warrants to purchase 1,500,000 shares of common stock that are currently exercisable or exercisable within 60 days of August 21, 2020.
(7)Comprised of 2,500,000 shares of common stock, convertible notes that are currently convertible or convertible within 60 days of August 21, 2020 and 3,793,000 shares of common stock and warrants to purchase 3,750,000 shares of common stock that are currently exercisable or exercisable within 60 days of August 21, 2020.
(8)Comprised of 4,166,667 shares of common stock, convertible notes that are currently convertible or convertible within 60 days of August 21, 2020 and warrants to purchase 5,509,588 shares of common stock that are currently exercisable or exercisable within 60 days of August 21, 2020.
(9)Comprised of 2,000,000 shares of common stock, convertible notes that are currently convertible or convertible within 60 days of August 21, 2020 and 1,256,250 shares of common stock and warrants to purchase 2,679,063 shares of common stock that are currently exercisable or exercisable within 60 days of August 21, 2020.
(10)Comprised of 1,850,000 shares of common stock, convertible notes that are currently convertible or convertible within 60 days of August 21, 2020 and 1,558,500 shares of common stock and warrants to purchase 2,125,625 shares of common stock that are currently exercisable or exercisable within 60 days of August 21, 2020.
(11)Comprised of 1,550,000 shares of common stock, convertible notes that are currently convertible or convertible within 60 days of August 21, 2020 and 1,133,333 shares of common stock and warrants to purchase 2,812,084 shares of common stock that are currently exercisable or exercisable within 60 days of August 21, 2020.
(12)Comprised of 1,773,333 shares of common stock, convertible notes that are currently convertible or convertible within 60 days of August 21, 2020 and 1,451,667 shares of common stock and warrants to purchase 1,847,460 shares of common stock that are currently exercisable or exercisable within 60 days of August 21, 2020.
(13)Comprised of 1,631,667 shares of common stock, convertible notes that are currently convertible or convertible within 60 days of August 21, 2020 and 1,224,167 shares of common stock and warrants to purchase 2,166,876 shares of common stock that are currently exercisable or exercisable within 60 days of August 21, 2020.

 

 

 3926 

 

Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence.

 

Procedures and Policies

 

We consider “related party transactions” to be transactions between our Company and (i) a director, officer, director nominee or beneficial owner of greater than five percent of our stock; (ii) the spouse, parents, children, siblings or in-laws of any person named in (i); or (iii) an entity in which one of our directors or officers is also a director or officer or has a material financial interest.

 

Our Board of Directors is vested with the responsibility of evaluating and approving any potential related party transaction, unless a special committee consisting solely of independent directors is appointed by the Board of Directors. We do not have any formal policies or procedures for related party transactions.

 

TransactionTransactions with Corporate RainRelated Parties

 

On March 9, 2015,During the Company engaged with a preeminent lead generationcurrent and presales outsourcing firm, Corporate Rain International (“CRI”). Tim Askew, a memberprior periods, one of the Company’s Board of Directors, is the founder and CEO of CRI. CRI’s lead generation abilities are intended to accelerate the Company’s market penetration and growth rate. Efforts undertaken by the Company’s public relations engagement(s) are intended to augment and enhance the capabilities of its presales staff provided by CRI. CRI will be compensated $6,000 per month along with a flat commission of $500 for each customer referred by CRIofficers made non-interest bearing loans to the Company perin the termsform of cash and payments to vendors on behalf of the engagement. 

Through these marketing, public relations, investor relationsCompany. The loans are due on demand and presales efforts, the Company hopes to generate sufficient market interest to support sales, and therefore targeted revenue projections.

unsecured. As of December 31, 2015,2018 and 2017, the Company is reflecting a liability of $0 and CRI suspended the engagement to reassess sales strategies.

Change in Control of the$9,941, respectively. The Company

On April 13, 2015, pursuant to a stock purchase agreement (“SPA”), Steven Allen Friedman, the owner of 18,000,000 shares of our common stock and the Company’s then President, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Director, sold the 18,000,000 shares to Captain’s Crew LLC (“CC”),which was 100% owned and managed by Jay Lasky, for aggregate consideration of $370,613.30, or approximately $0.0206 per share. Upon completion of the purchase, CC owned 18,000,000 shares, or approximately 94.8% of the Company’s then issued and outstanding Common Stock. In accordance with the purchase, effective did not impute interest on the same day, Mr. Friedman and Esther Gerson resigned from all positions of the Company, and Mr. Laskyloan as it was appointed to serve as the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and as the sole director.

Funds utilized for the purchase of the 18,000,000 shares by CC were provided by a number of unaffiliated persons that funded an escrow for the purpose of effecting a change of control of the Company in anticipation a share exchange. Subsequent to the purchase of shares by CC, the unaffiliated persons who funded CC also entered into agreements to acquire additional unrestricted shares of our common stock from certain non-affiliate shareholders of the Company. 

Forward Split and Share Cancellation

Upon the closing of the Share Exchange on August 14, 2015 by and among the Company, PeerLogix Delaware and shareholders of PeerLogix Delaware, 18,000,000 shares of common stock were cancelled by CC for no consideration (the “Share Cancellation”). Our common stock was forward-split on a 4.04 for 1 basis on September 15, 2015 following the closing of the Share Exchange so that there would have been 3,999,631 shares of our common stock issued and outstanding before taking into account the issuance of shares of common stock to purchasers of Units, each consisting of one share of the Company’s Common Stock and a warrant to purchase one share of Common Stock, in the offering conducted concurrently with the Share Exchange (the “Offering”). (Please refer to Financing Transactions under Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations for more information regarding the Offering.)

Upon the closing of the Share Exchange, Mr. Lasky resigned as Chief Executive Officer and sole director of the Company and officers and directors of PeerLogix Delaware were appointed to similar positions with the Company.

40

Transactions with the Placement Agent and its Related Parties

Prior to the commencement of the Share Exchange and the Offering, PeerLogix Delaware completed an offering (the “PeerLogix Delaware Offering”), wherein it sold 1,000,000 of its units to accredited investors (the “PeerLogix Delaware Units”) at a price of $0.50 per PeerLogix Delaware Unit, each of which consists of one share of common stock and a warrant to purchase one share of common stock of PeerLogix Delaware. The warrants are exercisable for a period of five years at a purchase price of $0.60 per share of common stock. WestPark, placement agent in the Peerlogix Delaware Offering as well as the Offering (the “Placement Agent”), received as compensation for its services $50,000 (10% commission) and warrants of PeerLogix Delaware that automatically converted upon the closing of the Share Exchange into warrants to purchase 50,000 of our Units at a price of $0.50 per Unit, with each Unit consisting of one share of our common stock and one warrant to purchase a share of our common stock at a price of $0.60 per share.

In June 2015, New World Merchant Partners LLC entered into an agreement with the Placement Agent pursuant to which it agreed to sell the Placement Agent or its designees an aggregate of 1,000,000 shares of common stock of PeerLogix Delaware and 250,000 shares of our Common Stock for aggregate consideration of $100 if designated milestones were satisfied in order to induce the Placement Agent to effect the Offering and the PeerLogix Delaware Offering. The 1,000,000 shares of PeerLogix Delaware may be deemed to be “restricted securities” and the 250,000 shares of our Common Stock are not considered “restricted securities.” Such milestones were not satisfied and such sale was never consummated.

The price of the units in the Offering and the PeerLogix Delaware Offering was determined following our discussions with the Placement Agent. Among the factors considered in the negotiations were our limited operating history, our history of losses, an assessment of our management and our proposed operations, our current financial condition, the prospects for the industry in which we operate, the prospects for the development of our business with the capital raised in the Offering and the PeerLogix Delaware Offering and the general condition of the securities markets at the time of the Offering and the PeerLogix Delaware Offering. The offering price of the Units or the exercise price of the Investor Warrants and the New Warrants does not necessarily bear any relationship to our assets, book value or results of operations or any other generally accepted criterion of value.

The Company has agreed to indemnify the Placement Agent and other broker-dealers who are FINRA members selected by the Placement Agent to offer and sell Units,de minimis to the fullest extent permitted by law against certain liabilities that may be incurred in connection with the Offering and the PeerLogix Delaware Offering, including certain civil liabilities under the Securities Act, and, where such indemnification is not available, to contribute to the payments the Placement Agent may be required to make in respect of such liabilities. Insofar as indemnification for liabilities arising under the Securities Act may be permitted to the Placement Agent, the Company has been advised that in the opinion of the SEC such indemnification is against public policy as expressed in the Securities Act and is, therefore, unenforceable.consolidated financial statements.

Sales by PeerLogix Delaware

In the first quarter of 2015, PeerLogix Delaware completed the PeerLogix Delaware Offering, wherein it sold $500,000 of PeerLogix Delaware Units to accredited investors. Each PeerLogix Delaware Unit was sold at a price of $0.50 and consisted of one (1) share of common stock, par value $0.001 per share, of PeerLogix Delaware and one (1) warrant entitling the holder to purchase one share of common stock of PeerLogix Delaware for a five-year period at an exercise price of $0.60 per share. All of the net proceeds that PeerLogix Delaware received from the PeerLogix Delaware Offering were for PeerLogix Delaware’s working capital. All of the PeerLogix Delaware Units sold in the PeerLogix Delaware Offering were converted to our securities upon the closing of the Share Exchange. The Placement Agent also acted as placement agent in connection with the PeerLogix Delaware Offering and received as compensation for its services $50,000 (10% commission) and warrants of PeerLogix Delaware that automatically converted upon the closing of the Share Exchange into warrants to purchase 50,000 of our Units at a price of $0.50 per Unit, with each Unit consisting of one share of our common stock and one warrant to purchase a share of our common stock at a price of $0.60 per share.

41

 

Item 14. Principal Accounting Fees and Services.

 

The aggregate fees billed for professional services rendered by Marcum LLP (“Marcum”) for the audit of our annual financial statements and review of financial statements included in the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the years ended December 31, 20152018 and 20142017 were approximately $68,000$119,748 and $65,000.

The aggregate fees billed for professional services rendered by Scrudato & Co., PA (“Scrudato”) for the review of our financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2015 were $4,000. The aggregate fees billed for professional services rendered by Scrudato for the audit of our annual financial statements and review of financial statements included in the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2014 were $3,500.$146,513.

 

The following table shows the fees for professional services rendered by Marcum and Scrudato during those periods:

 

Fee Category 2015  2014  2018  2017 
Audit Fees $72,000  $68,500  $119,748  $146,513 
Audit-Related Fees $  $  $  $ 
Tax Fees $  $  $  $ 
All Other Fees $  $  $  $ 
Total Fees $72,000  $68,500  $119,748  $146,513 

 

Audit fees consist of fees billed for professional services rendered for the audit of our financial statements and review of the interim financial statements included in quarterly reports and services that are normally provided by the above auditors in connection with statutory and regulatory fillings or engagements. Audit-related fees consist of fees billed for professional services rendered for the review of SEC filings or other reports containing the audited financial statements. Tax fees consist of fees to prepare the Company’s federal and state income tax returns. Other fees relate to advisory services related research on accounting or other regulatory matters.

 

Pre-Approval Policies and Procedures

 

Our board of directors is in the process of adopting a policy on pre-approval of audit and permissible non-audit services.

 

 

 

 

 

 4227 

 

PART IV

Item 15. Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules

 

(a) Financial Statements

 

Our financial statements as set forth in the Index to Consolidated Financial Statements attached hereto commencing on page F-1 and are hereby incorporated by reference.included herein.

 

(b) Exhibits

 

The following exhibits, which are numbered in accordance with Item 601 of Regulation S-K, are filed herewith or, as noted, incorporated by reference herein:

 

Exhibit
Number
 Description of Exhibits
3(i)(1)  Articles of Incorporation (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Registration Statement on Form S-1 as filed with the SEC on March 26, 2014)
3(i)(2) Certificate of Incorporation and Amendment (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.3 to the Current Report on Form 8-K as filed with the SEC on August 17, 2015)
3(i)(3) Certificate of Amendment to Articles of Incorporation (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K as filed with the SEC on September 10, 2015)
3(ii)(1) Bylaws (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.4 to the Current Report on Form 8-K as filed with the SEC on August 17, 2015)
16.1Letter from Scrudato & Co., PA to the Securities and Exchange Commission, dated April 14, 2016 *
31.1 Rule 13a-14(a)/ 15d-14(a) Certification of Chief Executive Officer *
31.2Rule 13a-14(a)/ 15d-14(a) Certification of Principal Financial Officer*
32.1 Section 1350 Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer *Officer*
101 Interactive Data Files *
101.SCH Extension Schema Document *
101.CAL XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document *
101.LAB XBRL Taxonomy Extension Labels Linkbase Document *
101.PRE XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document *
101.DEF XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document *

__________

* Filed herewith

 

 4328 

 

Peerlogix, Inc.

December 31, 20152018 and 20142017

Index to the Consolidated Financial Statements

 

Contents Page(s)
   
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting FirmF-1
Consolidated Balance Sheets at December 31, 2015 and 2014 F-2
   
Consolidated Statements of Operations for the Years EndedBalance Sheets at December 31, 20152018 and 20142017 F-3
   
Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ DeficiencyOperations for the Years Ended December 31, 20152018 and 20142017 F-4
   
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders’ Deficiency for the Years Ended December 31, 2018 and 2017F-5 – F-6
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Years Ended December 31, 20152018 and 20142017 F-5F-7
   
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements F-6F-8F-15F-28

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 44F-1 

 

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

 

 

To the Shareholders and Board of Directors and Stockholdersof

of Peerlogix, Inc.

New York, NY

Opinion on the Financial Statements

 

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Peerlogix, Inc. (the “Company”) as of December 31, 20152018 and 2014 and2017, the related consolidated statements of operations, changes in stockholders’ deficiency, and cash flows for the years then ended. These financial statements are the responsibilityeach of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement.  The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our audits included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriatetwo years in the circumstances, but not forperiod ended December 31, 2018, and the purpose of expressing an opinion onrelated notes (collectively referred to as the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation.  We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

“financial statements”). In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of Peerlogix, Inc.,the Company as of December 31, 20152018 and 20142017, and the consolidated results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the two years thenin the period ended December 31, 2018, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

Explanatory Paragraph – Going Concern

 

The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern. As more fully discloseddescribed in Note 2, to the consolidated financial statements, the Company has a significant working capital deficiency, has incurred netsignificant losses since inception and needs to raise additional funds to meet its obligations and sustain its operations. These conditions raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. Management’s plansplan in regard to these matters are also described in Note 2. The consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.

 

Basis for Opinion

These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company's financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) ("PCAOB") and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. As part of our audits, we are required to obtain an understanding of internal control over financial reporting but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company's internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion.

Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

/s/ Marcum llp

We have served as the Company's auditor since 2015.

Houston, Texas

December 18, 2020

 

 

/s/  Marcum LLP                     

Marcum llp

New York, NY

April 14, 2016

F-1

Peerlogix, Inc.

Consolidated Balance Sheets

  December 31, 2015  December 31, 2014 
Assets
       
Current Assets:        
Cash $1,298  $10,049 
Prepaid expenses and other current assets  19,973   495 
Total Current Assets  21,271   10,544 
         
         
Total Assets $21,271  $10,544 
         
Liabilities and Stockholders' Deficiency 
         
Current Liabilities:        
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities $249,080  $74,973 
Demand loans payable  15,000   15,000 
Current maturities of notes payable - related party     56,158 
Current maturities of convertible notes payable     25,000 
Loans payable - officers  33,648   29,607 
Total Current Liabilities  297,728   200,738 
         
Long-Term Liabilities:        
Convertible notes payable, net of current maturities     58,000 
Total Long-Term Liabilities     58,000 
         
Total Liabilities  297,728   258,738 
         
Commitments and Contingencies        
         
Stockholders' Equity (Deficiency)        
Preferred stock par value $0.001: 10,000,000 shares authorized; no shares issued or outstanding as of December 31, 2015 and 2014      
Common stock par value $0.001: 100,000,000 shares authorized;23,107,535 shares issued and outstanding as of December 31, 2015;16,000,002 shares issued and outstanding as of December 31, 2014  23,108   16,000 
Additional paid in capital  1,245,416   (239,727)
Accumulated deficit  (1,544,981)  (24,467)
Total Stockholders' Deficiency  (276,457)  (248,194)
         
Total Liabilities and Stockholders' Deficiency $21,271  $10,544 

See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements  

 

 

 F-2 

 

PEERLOGIX, INC.

Peerlogix, Inc.CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

Consolidated Statements of OperationsDECEMBER 31, 2018 AND 2017

     

 For the Years Ended 
 December 31, 2015  December 31, 2014 
       
Revenue $2,520  $ 
         
Operating expenses        
Compensation  294,875   26,052 
Research and development  293,516   57,407 
Professional fees  704,718   126,411 
General and administrative  205,032   61,726 
Operating expenses  1,498,141   271,596 
         
Loss from operations  (1,495,621)  (271,596)
         
Other income (expense)        
Interest expense  (24,962)  (3,563)
Interest income  69    
         
Other income (expense)  (24,893)  (3,563)
         
Net loss $(1,520,514) $(275,159)
         
Net loss per common share - basic and diluted $(0.08) $(0.02)
         
Weighted average common shares outstanding - basic and diluted  19,117,099   15,819,212 
  2018  2017 
ASSETS        
Current assets:        
Cash $26,377  $14,086 
Prepaid expenses and other current assets  19,070   19,070 
Total current assets  45,447   33,156 
         
Total assets $45,447  $33,156 
         
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' DEFICIT        
Current liabilities:        
Accounts payable $383,999  $421,518 
Accrued payroll and related expenses  407,437   371,069 
Accrued directors' fees  120,075   95,075 
Accrued interest and other liabilities  870,575   203,719 
Demand loans payable  15,000   15,000 
Settlement payable     41,857 
Convertible notes payable - net of debt discount of $305,598 and $277,969, respectively  1,800,352   1,432,081 
Loans payable - officers     9,941 
Derivative liabilities  2,773,654   935,274 
Total current liabilities  6,371,092   3,525,534 
         
Total liabilities  6,371,092   3,525,534 
         
Commitments and contingencies (Note 9)        
         
Stockholders' deficit:        
Preferred stock, par value $0.001; 10,000,000 shares authorized, no shares issued and outstanding as of December 31, 2018 and 2017      
Common stock, par value $0.001; 350,000,000 shares authorized; 54,018,285 and 46,122,368 shares issued and outstanding as of December 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively  54,018   46,122 
Additional paid in capital  11,233,109   4,850,445 
Subscriptions received  287,575    
Accumulated deficit  (17,900,347)  (8,388,945)
Total stockholders' deficit  (6,325,645)  (3,492,378)
         
Total liabilities and stockholders' deficit $45,447  $33,156 

See the accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements

F-3

PEERLOGIX, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

  Years ended December 31, 
  2018  2017 
       
Revenue $57,973  $1,096 
         
Operating expenses:        
General and administrative  4,823,936   1,981,944 
Total operating expenses  4,823,936   1,981,944 
         
Loss from operations  (4,765,963)  (1,980,848)
         
Other income (expense):        
Interest expense  (2,323,742)  (3,805,628)
Change in fair value of derivative liabilities  (1,547,402)  1,741,441 
Loss on loan receivable     (37,500)
Inducement expense  (734,273)   
Loss on settlement of debt  (140,022)  (913,562)
Total other expense  (4,745,439)  (3,015,249)
         
Net loss $(9,511,402) $(4,996,097)
         
Net loss per common share - basic and diluted $(0.15) $(0.12)
         
Weighted average common shares outstanding - basic and diluted  63,490,608   42,366,866 

 

See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements

 

 

F-3

Peerlogix, Inc.

Consolidated Statements of Stockholders' Deficiency

For the Years Ended December 31, 2015 and 2014

             Additional   Total 
 Class A Units Preferred Stock Common Stock Paid-in Accumulated Stockholders' 
 Shares Amount Shares Amount Shares Amount Capital Deficit Deficiency 
                   
Balance, December 31, 2013 10,472 $45,000   $   $ $ $(82,072)$(37,072)
                            
Class A units issued for services 698  64,037              64,037 
                            
Recapitalization from LLC to corporation (11,170) (109,037)     16,000,002  16,000  (239,727) 332,764   
                            
Net loss               (275,159) (275,159)
                            
Balance, December 31, 2014         16,000,002  16,000  (239,727) (24,467) (248,194)
                            
Common stock and warrants issued for cash         2,683,336  2,683  1,507,318    1,510,001 
                            
Common stock and warrants issued for settlement of convertible notes         174,566  175  90,987    91,162 
                            
Related party loan forgiven             2,577    2,577 
                            
Common stock issued for services         250,000  250  149,750    150,000 
                            
Warrants issued for services             126,000    126,000 
                            
Stock issuance costs             (387,489)   (387,489)
                            
Common stock issued in reverse recapitalization         3,999,631  4,000  (4,000)    
                            
Net loss               (1,520,514) (1,520,514)
                            
Balance, December 31, 2015  $   $  23,107,535 $23,108 $1,245,416 $(1,544,981)$(276,457)

 

See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements

 

 F-4 

 

Peerlogix, Inc.

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

 

PEERLOGIX, INC.

 For the Years Ended 
 December 31, 2015  December 31, 2014 
Cash Flows From Operating Activities:        
Net loss $(1,520,514) $(275,159)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities        
Class A units issued for services     64,037 
Stock based compensation  150,000    
Amortization of debt discount  8,750    
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:        
Prepaid expenses and other current assets  (19,478)  (495)
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities  182,413   62,667 
Net Cash Used In Operating Activities  (1,198,829)  (148,950)
         
Cash Flows From Financing Activities:        
Proceeds from demand loans  5,500    
Repayment of demand loans  (5,500)   
Proceeds from notes payable  17,500    
Repayment of notes payable  (26,250)   
Proceeds from notes payable - related party     53,725 
Repayment of notes payable - related party  (53,725)   
Proceeds from officer loans  4,041   17,368 
Proceeds from convertible notes     83,000 
Net proceeds from issuance of common stock and warrants  1,248,512    
Net Cash Provided By Financing Activities  1,190,078   154,093 
         
Net change  in cash  (8,751)  5,143 
         
Cash at beginning of year  10,049   4,906 
         
Cash at end of year $1,298  $10,049 
         
Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information:        
Interest paid $19,360  $ 
Income tax paid $  $ 
         
Supplemental disclosure of non-cash investing and financing activities:        
Common stock and warrants issued for conversion of convertible notes and accrued interest $91,162  $ 
Stock issuance costs paid in the form of warrants $126,000  $ 
Forgiveness of related party loan $2,577  $ 
Original issue discount on notes payable $8,750  $ 
Recapitalization from LLC to corporation $  $223,727 

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS' DEFICIENCY

FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2018 AND 2017

        Additional          
  Common stock  Paid in  Subscriptions  Accumulated    
  Shares  Amount  Capital  Received  Deficit  Total 
Balance, January 1, 2017  26,860,825  $26,861  $2,430,276  $  $(3,392,848) $(935,711)
Common stock issued in connection with notes payable  8,211,333   8,211   (2,239)        5,972 
Common stock issued in modification of convertible notes payable, related party  218,750   219   12,906         13,125 
Common stock issued in settlement of payables  878,710   878   82,601         83,479 
Common stock issued for services  5,119,750   5,120   429,147         434,267 
Common stock issued as payment of accrued interest on convertible notes payable  4,833,000   4,833   414,347         419,180 
Fair value of warrants issued in connection with convertible notes payable        18,681         18,681 
Warrants issued in connection with extension of convertible notes payable        767,936         767,936 
Reclassify beneficial conversion feature to derivative liability        (172,036)        (172,036)
Reclassify derivative liability to equity upon payoff of convertible notes payable        48,093         48,093 
Modifications of investor warrants        37,329         37,329 
Fair value of warrants due to agent in connection with extension of convertible notes payable        188,120         188,120 
Stock based compensation        595,284          595,284 
Net loss              (4,996,097)  (4,996,097)
Balance, December 31, 2017  46,122,368  $46,122  $4,850,445  $  $(8,388,945) $(3,492,378)

 

See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements

 

 F-5 

 

Peerlogix, Inc.PEERLOGIX, INC.

DecemberCONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS' DEFICIENCY

FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2015 and 20142018 AND 2017

Notes

        Additional          
  Common stock  Paid in  Subscriptions  Accumulated    
  Shares  Amount  Capital  Received  Deficit  Total 
Balance, January 1, 2018  46,122,368  $46,122  $4,850,445  $  $(8,388,945) $(3,492,378)
Common stock issued in connection with settlement agreement  800,000   800   52,000         52,800 
Common stock issued for accrued interest on convertible notes payable  666,000   666   39,294         39,960 
Common stock issued in exchange for warrants exercised  6,429,917   6,430   376,265         382,695 
Inducement cost to exercise warrants        734,273         734,273 
Fair value of warrants issued in connection with convertible notes payable        152,243         152,243 
Fair value of warrants issued in connection with extension of convertible notes payable        1,109,829         1,109,829 
Fair value of warrants issued for services        1,280,507         1,280,507 
Reclassify derivative liability to equity upon payoff of convertible notes payable and accrued interest        31,271         31,271 
Proceeds received from exercise of warrants           287,575      287,575 
Stock based compensation        2,606,982         2,606,982 
Net loss              (9,511,402)  (9,511,402)
Balance, December 31, 2018  54,018,285  $54,018  $11,233,109  $287,575  $(17,900,347) $(6,325,645)

See accompanying notes to the Consolidated Financial Statementsconsolidated financial statements

F-6

PEERLOGIX, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

  Years ended December 31, 
  2018  2017 
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:        
Net loss $(9,511,402) $(4,996,097)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities:        
Stock based compensation  2,606,982   1,024,431 
Amortization of debt discounts  703,544   1,766,925 
Non cash interest  111,606   1,442,654 
Fair value of warrants issued in connection with warrant extensions  1,109,829    
Inducement expense  734,273    
Change in fair value of derivative liabilities  1,547,402   (1,741,441)
Loss on loan receivable     37,500 
Loss on settlement of debt  140,022   936,915 
Fair value of warrants issued for services  1,280,507    
Modification of investor warrants     37,329 
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:        
Prepaid expenses and other current assets     15,323 
Accounts payable  (37,520)  143,504 
Accrued payroll and related expenses  36,368   149,231 
Accrued director fees  25,000   55,000 
Other accrued liabilities  387,839   403,483 
Settlement payable  (115,375)   
Net cash used in operating activities  (980,925)  (725,243)
         
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:        
Loan to abandoned acquisition target     (37,500)
Net cash used in investing activities     (37,500)
         
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:        
Proceeds from convertible notes  362,887   901,138 
Proceeds from officer loans     11,156 
Proceeds from exercise of warrants  670,270    
Repayments of notes payable - related party     (50,018)
Repayments of convertible notes payable  (30,000)  (106,000)
Repayments of officer loans  (9,941)  (35,469)
Net cash provided by financing activities  993,216   720,807 
         
Net change in cash  12,291   (41,936)
         
Cash - beginning of period  14,086   56,022 
Cash - end of period $26,377  $14,086 
         
Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information:        
Interest paid $  $15,670 
Income taxes paid $  $ 
         
Supplemental disclosure on non-cash investing and financing activities:        
Debt discount paid in form of common shares and warrants $380,439  $24,653 
Debt discount recorded on convertible debt accounted for as derivative liabilities $305,273  $1,256,460 
Repurchase of beneficial conversion feature due to reassessment of derivative liability $  $172,036 
Common stock issued in settlement of accrued interest $39,960  $419,180 
Reclassification of derivative liability to equity $31,271  $48,093 
Debt issuance cost paid in form of common stock and warrants $  $188,120 
Debt issuance cost accrued $  $98,885 
Common stock issued in connection with settlement of liabilities $52,800  $83,479 

See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements

F-7

PEERLOGIX, INC.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

Note

NOTE 1 – Organization and OperationsORGANIZATION AND OPERATIONS

 

Peerlogix, Inc. (formerly “Realco International, Inc.”) (“Peerlogix” or the “Company”) was incorporated in Nevada on February 14, 2014. The Company was originally established for the purpose of real estate salesis an advertising technology and management in Europe, the Middle East and the United States. On September 3, 2015, we filed an Amendment to our Certificate of Incorporation by which we changed our name from Realco International, Inc. to Peerlogix, Inc.

Recent Developments

Acquisition of Peerlogix Technolgies, Inc.

On August 14, 2015, (the “Closing Date”) the Company and Peerlogix Technologies, Inc. (formerly Peerlogix, Inc.), a privately held company, entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger (the “Merger Agreement”).  Under the terms of the Merger Agreement, Peerlogix Technologies, Inc. exchanged all of their shares of common stock for newly issued common shares of the Company (the “Share Exchange”), with the Company remaining as the surviving corporation (the “Merger”).   Following the closing of the Merger, the Company changed its name to Peerlogix, Inc. The stockholders of the Company before the Share Exchange, after giving effect to cancellation of 18,000,000 shares of the Company’s common stock, retained 990,000 shares of the Company’s common stock, which after giving effect to a 4.04 for 1 split of the Company’s common stock (the “Stock Split”), will have become approximately 3,999,600 shares of Realco common stock. Upon closing the transaction, Peerlogix, Inc. had 21,049,602 shares of common stock outstanding. As a result of this transaction, the former owners of Peerlogix Technologies, Inc. own approximately 81.0% of Peerlogix, Inc. common stock as of the closing date.

The Share Exchange has been treated as a reverse merger and recapitalization of Peerlogix Technologies, Inc. for financial accounting purposes and the Company will continue the existing business operations of Peerlogix Technologies, Inc. as a wholly-owned subsidiary. The historical financial statements of the Company are those of Peerlogix Technologies, Inc, and of the consolidated entities from the date of merger forward. As a result of this merger, the equity sections of Peerlogix Technologies, Inc. for all prior periods presented reflect the recapitalization described above and are consistent with the December 31, 2015 and 2014 consolidated balance sheets presented for the Company.

Peerlogix Technologies, Inc. was incorporated on December 9, 2014 under the laws of the State of Delaware for the sole purpose of acquiring all of the outstanding membership units of IP Squared Technologies Holdings, LLC, an entity organized in 2012. Upon incorporation, the Company issued an aggregate of 16,000,002 common shares of the newly formed corporation’s common stock to the members of the LLC for all of the outstanding membership units of IP Squared Technologies Holdings, LLC (the “Recapitalization”).

As a result of the foregoing transactions, Peerlogix is now a data aggregation company providing a proprietarycompany. The Company provides software as a service (“SAAS”)(SAAS) platform, which enables the tracking and cataloguing of Torrent filesover-the-top viewership and Torrent networkslistenership in order to determine consumer trends and preferences based upon media consumption. Prior to the merger, the Company had minimal operations.

Simultaneously with the Share Exchange, on the Closing Date allIts platform collects over-the-top data, including Internet Protocol (IP) addresses of the issuedstreaming and outstanding optionsdownloading parties (location), the name, media type and warrantsgenre of media watched, listened or downloaded, and utilizes licensed and publicly available demographic and other databases to purchase shares of Peerlogix Technologies Inc. common stock were exchanged, respectively,further filter the collected data to provide insights into options (the “New Options”)consumer preferences to digital advertising firms, product and warrants (the “New Warrants”) to purchase shares of common stock of the Company. The number of shares of common stock issuable under,media companies, entertainment studios and the price per share upon exercise of, the New Options and the New Warrants were the same as those of the original options and warrants of Peerlogix Technologies Inc., as a result of a 1 for 1 exchange ratio of securities pursuant to the Share Exchange, which is described in the Share Exchange Agreement. The New Options will be administered under the Company’s 2015 Equity Incentive Plan, which the Company assumed and adopted on the Closing Date in connection with the Share Exchange.others.

F-6

 

NoteNOTE 2 – Going Concern and Management Liquidity PlansGOING CONCERN AND MANAGEMENT’S LIQUIDITY PLANS

 

The Company has generated minimal revenues since inception and continues to incur recurring losses from operations and has an accumulated deficit since inception.deficit. Accordingly, the accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern. The Company has incurred a net loss of approximately $1,520,000$9.5 million and net cash used in operations of approximately $1,200,000$981,000 for the year ended December 31, 2015.2018. In addition, the Company has notes payable in default (see Note 6). These conditions raiseindicate that there is substantial doubt about the Company's ability to continue as a going concern.concern within one year from the issuance date of the consolidated financial statements.

 

The Company's primary source of operating funds since inception has been cash proceeds from the sale of Class A units, common stockdebt and common stock warrants, convertible debentures and notes payable.equity financing. The ability of the Company to continue as a going concern is dependent upon its ability to further implement its business plan and generate sufficient revenue and its ability to raise additional funds by way of a public or private offering. (See Note 14 for financing activities subsequent to December 31, 2015.)11)

 

The Company requires immediate capital to remain viable. The Company can give no assurance that such financing will be available on terms advantageous to the Company, or at all. Should the Company not be successful in obtaining the necessary financing to fund its operations, the Company would need to curtail certain or all of its operational activities. There can be no assurance that such a plan will be successful. The accompanying consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments that might be necessary should the Company be unable to continue as a going concern.

 

Accordingly, the accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared in conformity with U.S. GAAP,generally accepted accounting principles (“U.S. GAAP”), which contemplates continuation of the Company as a going concern and the realization of assets and satisfaction of liabilities in the normal course of business. The carrying amounts of assets and liabilities presented in the consolidated financial statements do not necessarily purport to represent realizable or settlement values. The consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustment that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.

On November 1, 2019, the Company retained Bankers Capital International to explore strategic alternatives in order to maximize shareholder value. The Company has not set a formal timetable for this exploration, nor has it made any decisions related to the form or structure of strategic alternatives at this time. The Company can not make assurances that the process will result in a transaction.

 

NoteNOTE 3 – Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Basis of Presentation

The accompanying consolidated financial statements and related notes have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“U.S. GAAP”).

Fiscal Year-End

The Company elected December 31 as its fiscal year-end date.SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

 

Principles of Consolidation

 

The Company's wholly-ownedaccompanying consolidated subsidiaries are as follows:

Name of consolidated subsidiary or entityState or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organizationDate of incorporation or formation (date of acquisition, if applicable)Attributable interest
Peerlogix Technologies, Inc.DelawareDecember 9, 2014
(August 14, 2015)
100%
IP Squared Technologies Holdings, LLCDelaware

November 20, 2012

(December 9, 2014)

100%

The historical financial statements include the accounts of the Company are those of PeerLogixand its wholly-owned subsidiaries, Peerlogix Technologies, Inc., and of the consolidated entities from the date of merger forward.IP Squared Technologies Holdings, LLC. All significant inter-company balancesintercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated.eliminated in consolidation.

 

 F-7F-8 

 

Use of Estimates

 

The preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the period. Actual results could differ from these estimates. The Company’s significant estimates and assumptions include the fair value of the Company’s equity instruments, convertible debt, derivative liabilities, stock-based compensation, and the valuation allowance relating to the Company’s deferred tax assets.

 

Concentration of Credit RiskReclassifications

Certain prior year amounts in the consolidated financial statements and the notes thereto have been reclassified where necessary to conform to the current year presentation. These reclassifications did not affect the prior period total assets, total liabilities, stockholders’ deficit, net loss or net cash used in operating activities.

Revenue Recognition

 

The Company maintains depositsrecognizes revenue when delivery of the promised goods or services is transferred to its customers, in an amount that reflects the consideration that the Company expects to receive in exchange for those goods or services.

Effective January 1, 2018, the Company adopted Accounting Standard Codification(“ASU”) 2014-09  “Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606),” which supersedes the revenue recognition requirements in Topic 605, Revenue Recognition, and most industry-specific revenue recognition guidance throughout the Industry Topics of the Accounting Standards Codification. The updated guidance states that an entity should recognize revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. The guidance also provides for additional disclosures with respect to revenues and cash flows arising from contracts with customers. The Company adopted the standard using the modified retrospective approach effective January 1, 2018. There was no significant impact from adoption of Topic 606.

At the time of each transaction, management assesses whether the fee associated with the transaction is fixed or determinable and whether or not collection is reasonably assured. The assessment of whether the fee is fixed or determinable is based upon the payment terms of the transaction. Collectability is assessed based on a financial institutionnumber of factors, including past transaction history with the client and the creditworthiness of the client.

The Company generates revenue primarily by licensing our Over-the-Top audience dataset to platforms and channel partners.  As such, the Company predominantly contracts with Data Management Platforms (DMPs) and Demand Side Platforms (DSPs) (collectively, “Demand Partners”) who license the Company’s solution to use in conjunction with other solutions offered to their advertiser clients, including brands and advertising agencies. When the Company contracts with a Demand Partner, it acts as an agent for a disclosed or undisclosed principal, which is insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”). advertiser.

The balance at times may exceed federally insured limits.Company contracts with Demand Partners, including DMPs and DSPs representing advertisers, are generally in the form of a revenue share between the Demand Partner and the Company. Revenue payouts to the Company typically occur within sixty (60) days after the end of each calendar month, and the contracts typically have an initial term of a year. Due to the uncertainty of amount of revenue earned during the process, it is recognized upon payout and receipt of payment. Revenue through December 31, 2018 had been de minimis to the consolidated financial statements.

The Company had three major customers including their affiliates which generated approximately 91% (60.0%, 16% and 15%) of its revenue in the year ended December 31, 2018. 

F-9

 

Cash and Cash Equivalents

 

The Company considers all highly liquid investments with an original maturity of three months or less when purchased to be cash equivalents. As of December 31, 20152018 and 2014,2017, the Company does not have any cash equivalents.

Income Taxes

Deferred tax assets and liabilities are determined on the basis of the difference between the tax basis of assets and liabilities and their respective financial reporting amounts (“temporary differences”) at enacted tax rates in effect for the years in which the temporary differences are expected to reverse. The Company recognizes deferred tax assets and liabilities for the expected future tax consequences of these differences that have been included or excluded in the financial statements or tax returns.

The Company follows a recognition threshold and measurement process for consolidated financial statement recognition and measurement of a tax position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. The guidance also prescribes direction on the recognition, classification, interest and penalties in interim periods, disclosure and transition.

The Company classifies interest expense and any related penalties, if any, related to income tax uncertainties as a component of income tax expense. No interest or penalties have been recognized as of December 31, 2015 and 2014.

Management has evaluated and concluded that there were no material uncertain tax positions requiring recognition in the Company’s financial statements for the years ended December 31, 2015 and 2014. The Company does not expect any significant changes in the unrecognized tax benefits within twelve months of the reporting date.

Prior to the Recapitalization in December 2014, the Company was a Delaware limited liability company that passed through income and losses to its members. As a result, the Company was not subject to any U.S. federal or state income taxes as the related tax consequences were reported by the individual members and would not have had a material impact on the consolidated financial statements. See Note 1.

 

Convertible Instruments

 

The Company bifurcates conversion options from their host instruments and account for them as free standing derivative financial instruments according to certain criteria. The criteria includes circumstances in which (a) the economic characteristics and risks of the embedded derivative instrument are not clearly and closely related to the economic characteristics and risks of the host contract, (b) the hybrid instrument that embodies both the embedded derivative instrument and the host contract is not re-measured at fair value under otherwise applicable generally accepted accounting principles with changes in fair value reported in earnings as they occur and (c) a separate instrument with the same terms as the embedded derivative instrument would be considered a derivative instrument. An exception to this rule when the host instrument is deemed to be conventional as that term is described under applicable U.S. GAAP.

  

F-8

When the Company has determined that the embedded conversion options should not be bifurcated from their host instruments, the Company records, when necessary, discounts to convertible notes for the intrinsic value of conversion options embedded in debt instruments based upon the differences between the fair value of the underlying common stock at the commitment date of the note transaction and the effective conversion price embedded in the note. Debt discounts under these arrangements are amortized over the term of the related debt to their stated date of redemption. The Company also records, when necessary, deemed dividends for the intrinsic value of conversion options embedded in preferred shares based upon the differences between the fair value of the underlying common stock at the commitment date of the transaction and the effective conversion price embedded in the preferred shares.

 

Accounting for Warrants

 

The Company classifies as equity any contracts that (i) require physical settlement or net-share settlement or (ii) gives the Company a choice of net-cash settlement or settlement in its own shares (physical settlement or net-share settlement). The Company classifies as assets or liabilities any contracts that (i) require net-cash settlement (including a requirement to net-cash settle the contract if an event occurs and if that event is outside the control of the Company) or (ii) gives the counterparty a choice of net-cash settlement or settlement in shares (physical settlement or net-share settlement).

 

The Company assessed the classification of its common stock purchase warrants as of the date of each equity offering and determined that such instruments met the criteria for equity classification, as the settlement terms indicate that the instruments are indexed to the entity’s underlying stock.

 

Research and DevelopmentConcentrations of Credit Risk

 

ResearchFinancial instruments and development (“R&D”) expenses are chargedrelated items, which potentially subject the Company to operations as incurred.concentrations of credit risk, consist primarily of cash and cash equivalents. The Company places its cash and temporary cash investments with credit quality institutions. At times, such amounts may be in excess of the FDIC insurance limit.

 

AdvertisingDerivative Liabilities

 

In connection with the issuance of certain convertible promissory notes, the terms of the convertible notes included an embedded conversion feature which provided for the settlement of certain convertible promissory notes into shares of common stock at a rate which was determined to be variable with no floor. The Company expenses advertising when incurred. Duringdetermined that the years ended December 31, 2015conversion feature was an embedded derivative instrument pursuant to Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 815 “Derivatives and 2014,Hedging”

F-10

The accounting treatment of derivative financial instruments requires that the Company incurred advertising expensesrecord the conversion option, if applicable, at their fair values as of $28,933the inception date of the agreements and $0, respectively.at fair value as of each subsequent balance sheet date. Any change in fair value was recorded as a change in the fair value of derivative liabilities for each reporting period at each balance sheet date. The Company reassesses the classification at each balance sheet date. If the classification changes as a result of events during the period, the contract is reclassified as of the date of the event that caused the reclassification.

The fair values of conversion options that are convertible at a variable conversion price are valued using a Black-Scholes Valuation Model and the assumptions used in the calculation would produce substantially the same results if valued through a lattice model.

The Black-Scholes Valuation Model includes subjective input assumptions that can materially affect the fair value estimates. The model was developed for use in estimating the fair value of traded options or warrants. The expected volatility is estimated based on the most recent historical period of time equal to the weighted average life of the instrument granted.

The principal assumptions used in applying the Black-Scholes model were as follows:

Year Ended
December 31, 2018
Risk-free interest rate1.63% – 2.83%
Contractual term0.02 - 4.00 years
Expected volatility228.055%-265.65%
Dividends0.0%

Year Ended
December 31, 2017
Risk-free interest rate0.52 – 2.20%
Contractual term0.02 - 4.00 years
Expected volatility200% - 353%
Dividends0.0%

At any given time, certain of the Company’s embedded conversion features on debt and outstanding warrants may be treated as derivative liabilities for accounting purposes under ASC 815-40 due to insufficient authorized shares to settle these outstanding contracts. Pursuant to SEC staff guidance that permits a sequencing approach based on the use of ASC 815-15-25 which provides guidance for contracts that permit partial net share settlement. The sequencing approach may be applied in one of two ways: contracts may be evaluated based on (1) earliest issuance date or (2) latest maturity date. Pursuant to the sequencing approach, the Company evaluates its contracts based upon the latest maturity date.

 

Net Loss Per Share

 

Basic loss per share was computed using the weighted average number of outstanding common shares. Diluted earnings per share, when presented, includes the effect of dilutive common stock equivalents from the assumed exercise of options, warrants, convertible preferred stock and convertible notes. Common stock equivalents are excluded in the computation of diluted earnings per share since their inclusion would be anti-dilutive.

 

F-11

Total shares issuable upon the exercise of warrants, exercise of stock options and conversion of convertible promissory notes for the yearsyear ended December 31, 20152018 and 20142017 were as follows:

 

 December 31,  December 31, 
 2015  2014  2018  2017 
Warrants  2,951,669      59,028,170   36,305,369 
Convertible promissory notes     96,248 
Stock options  52,400,000   24,550,000 
Convertible promissory notes and accrued interest  53,662,991   35,227,200 
Total  2,951,669   96,248   165,091,161   96,082,569 

For the year ended December 31, 2018 and 2017, 14,124,453 and 4,269,941 warrants were included in basic and diluted loss per share as their exercise price was determined to be nominal.

 

Share-Based CompensationIncome Taxes

Deferred tax assets and liabilities are computed based upon the difference between the financial statement and income tax basis of assets and liabilities using the enacted marginal tax rate applicable when the related asset or liability is expected to be realized or settled. Deferred income tax expenses or benefits are based on the changes in the asset or liability during each period. If available evidence suggests that it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized, a valuation allowance is required to reduce the deferred tax assets to the amount that is more likely than not to be realized. Future changes in such valuation allowance are included in the provision for deferred income taxes in the period of change. Deferred income taxes may arise from temporary differences resulting from income and expense items reported for financial accounting and tax purposes in different periods.

The Company follows a recognition threshold and measurement process for consolidated financial statement recognition and measurement of a tax position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. The guidance also prescribes direction on the recognition, classification, interest and penalties in interim periods, disclosure and transition.

The Company classifies interest expense and any related penalties, if any, related to income tax uncertainties as a component of income tax expense. No interest or penalties have been recognized as of December 31, 2018 and 2017.

Management has evaluated and concluded that there was no material uncertain tax positions requiring recognition in the Company’s financial statements for the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017. The Company does not expect any significant changes in the unrecognized tax benefits within twelve months of the reporting date.

Research and development costs

All research and development costs are charged to expense as incurred. Accordingly, internal research and development costs are expensed as incurred. Third-party research and developments costs are expensed when the contracted work has been performed or as milestone results have been achieved. Company-sponsored research and development costs related to both present and future products are expensed in the period incurred. The Company incurred minimal research and development expenses for the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017.

Advertising

The Company follows the policy of charging the costs of advertising to expense as incurred. The Company charged to operations $26,625 and $6,453 as advertising costs for the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively.

F-12

Stock based compensation

 

The Company measures the cost of services received in exchange for an award of equity instruments based on the fair value of the award. For employees and directors, the fair value of the award is measured on the grant date and amortized over the respective employment agreements or director service periods. Forfor non-employees, the fair value of the award is measured on the commitment date and generally re-measured on vesting dates and interim financial reporting dates until the service period is complete. The fair value amount is then recognized over the period during which services are required to be provided in exchange for the award, usually the vesting period. Stock-based compensation expense is recorded by the Company in the same expense classifications in the consolidated statements of operations, as if such amounts were paid in cash.

F-9

 

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

 

The carrying amounts of cash and accounts payable and accrued liabilities approximate fair value due to the short-term nature of these instruments.

 

The Company measures the fair value of financial assets and liabilities based on the guidance of ASC 820 “Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures” which defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value, and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. ASC 820 defines fair value as the exchange price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date. ASC 820 also establishes a fair value hierarchy, which requires an entity to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value.

 

ASC 820 describes three levels of inputs that may be used to measure fair value:

 

Level 1 Quoted market prices available in active markets for identical assets or liabilities as of the reporting date.
   
Level 2 Pricing inputs other than quoted prices in active markets included in Level 1, which are either directly or indirectly observable as of the reporting date.
   
Level 3 Pricing inputs that are generally unobservable inputs and not corroborated by market data.

 

Level 3 liabilities are valued using unobservable inputs to the valuation methodology that are significant to the measurement of the fair value of the warrant liabilities. For fair value measurements categorized within Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy, the Company’s Chief ExecutivePrincipal Financial Officer determines its valuation policies and procedures.

 

The development and determination of the unobservable inputs for Level 3 fair value measurements and fair value calculations are the responsibility of the Company’s Chief ExecutivePrincipal Financial Officer.

 

Changes in fair value measurements categorized within Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy are analyzed each period based on changes in estimates or assumptions and recorded as appropriate.

 

No such items existed as of December 31, 2015 and 2014.

 

Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements

In June 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued Accounting Standards Update 2014-12, Compensation-Stock Compensation. The amendments in this update apply to reporting entities that grant their employees share-based payments in which the terms of the award provide that a performance target can be achieved after the requisite service period. This Accounting Standards Update is the final version of Proposed Accounting Standards Update EITF-13D-Compensation-Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Accounting for Share-Based Payments When the Terms of an Award Provide That a Performance Target Could Be Achieved after the Requisite Service Period, which has been deleted. The amendments require that a performance target that affects vesting and that could be achieved after the requisite service period be treated as a performance condition. A reporting entity should apply existing guidance in Topic 718 as it relates to awards with performance conditions that affect vesting to account for such awards. As such, the performance target should not be reflected in estimating the grant-date fair value of the award. Compensation cost should be recognized in the period in which it becomes probable that the performance target will be achieved and should represent the compensation cost attributable to the period(s) for which the requisite service has already been rendered. If the performance target becomes probable of being achieved before the end of the requisite service period, the remaining unrecognized compensation cost should be recognized prospectively over the remaining requisite service period. The total amount of compensation cost recognized during and after the requisite service period should reflect the number of awards that are expected to vest and should be adjusted to reflect those awards that ultimately vest. The requisite service period ends when the employee can cease rendering service and still be eligible to vest in the award if the performance target is achieved. As indicated in the definition of vest, the stated vesting period (which includes the period in which the performance target could be achieved) may differ from the requisite service period. The amendments in this update are effective for annual periods and interim periods within those annual periods beginning after December 15, 2015, and early adoption is permitted. The adoption of ASU 2014-12 is not expected to have a material impact on our consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

 

 F-10F-13 

 

In August 2014,Financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis are summarized below and disclosed on the Financialbalance sheets as follows:

December 31, 2018    Fair Value Measurement Using 
  Carrying
Value
  Level 1  Level 2  Level 3  Total 
Derivative conversion features $2,773,654  $  $  $2,773,654  $2,773,654 
                     
December 31, 2017    Fair Value Measurement Using 
  Carrying
Value
  Level 1  Level 2  Level 3  Total 
Derivative conversion features $935,274  $  $  $935,274  $935,274 
                     

The table below provides a summary of the changes in fair value, including net transfers in and/or out, of all financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3) during the year ended December 31, 2018:

  Fair Value
Measurement Using
Level 3 Inputs
 
  Total 
Balance, January 1, 2017 $ 
Reclassification of derivative liability from equity  172,036 
Issuances, reassessments and settlements  2,552,772 
Reclassify to equity upon note payoff  (48,093)
Change in fair value  (1,741,441)
Balance, December 31, 2017  935,274 
Fair value of derivative at issuance date  322,251 
Reclassify to equity upon note payoff  (31,271)
Change in fair value  1,547,402 
Balance, December 31, 2018 $2,773,654 

Changes in the unobservable input values could potentially cause material changes in the fair value of the Company’s Level 3 financial instruments. The significant unobservable inputs used in the fair value measurements are the expected volatility assumption. A significant increase (decrease) in the expected volatility assumption could potentially result in a higher (lower) fair value measurement.

Recently Issued Accounting Standards BoardGuidance

We have reviewed the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update 2014-15, Presentation of Financial Statements-Going Concern.  The Update provides U.S. GAAP guidance on management’s responsibility(“ASU”) accounting pronouncements and interpretations thereof that have effectiveness dates during the periods reported and in evaluating whether there is substantial doubt about a company’s ability to continue as a going concern and about related footnote disclosures. For each reporting period, management will be required to evaluate whether there are conditions or events that raise substantial doubt about a company’s ability to continue as a going concern within one year from the date the financial statements are issued. This Accounting Standards Update is the final version of Proposed Accounting Standards Update 2013-300-Presentation of Financial Statements (Topic 205): Disclosure of Uncertainties about an Entity’s Going Concern Presumption, which has been deleted. The amendments in this update are effective for the annual period ending after December 15, 2016, and for annual periods and interim periods thereafter. The adoption of ASU 2014-15 is not expected to have a material impact on our consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

In April 2015, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued Accounting Standards Update 2015-03, Interest—Imputation of Interest.  To simplify presentation of debt issuance costs, the amendments in this Update would require that debt issuance costs be presented in the balance sheet as a direct deduction from the carrying amount of debt liability, consistent with debt discounts or premiums. The recognition and measurement guidance for debt issuance costs would not be affected by the amendments in this Update.  This Accounting Standards Update is the final version of Proposed Accounting Standards Update 2014-250—Interest—Imputation of Interest (Subtopic 835-30), which has been deleted. The amendments in this Update are effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2015, and interim periods within those fiscal years.future periods. The Company is currently evaluating the effects of ASU 2015-03 on its consolidated financial position.

In August 2015, the FASB issued the FASB Accounting Standards Update No. 2015-14 “Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606): Deferral of the Effective Date” (“ASU 2015-14”).The amendments in this Update defer the effective date of Update 2014-09 for all entities by one year. Public business entities, certain not-for-profit entities, and certain employee benefit plans should apply the guidance in Update 2014-09 to annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim reporting periods within that reporting period. Earlier application is permitted only as of annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016, including interim reporting periods within that reporting period. The Company is currently assessing the impact, if any, of the adoption of ASU 2015-04 on the consolidated financial statements.

In February 2016, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued Accounting Standards Update ("ASU") No. 2016-02, “Leases” (Topic 842). The FASB issued this update to increase transparency and comparability among organizations by recognizing lease assets and lease liabilities on the balance sheet and disclosing key information about leasing arrangements. The updated guidance is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2018, including interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption of the update is permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the impact ofhas carefully considered the new standard.

The FASB and the SEC have issued certainpronouncements that alter previous generally accepted accounting standards updates and regulations that will become effective in subsequent periods; however, management of the Company does not believe that any of those updates would have significantly affected the Company’s financial accounting measures or disclosures had they been in effect during 2015 or 2014,principles and does not believe that any of those pronouncementsnew or modified principles will have a significantmaterial impact on the Company’s consolidatedcorporation’s reported financial statements atposition or operations in the time they become effective.near term. The applicability of any standard is subject to the formal review of our financial management and certain standards are under consideration.

F-14

 

Subsequent Events

 

The Company evaluates events that have occurred after the balance sheet date but before the consolidated financial statements are issued. Based upon the evaluation, the Company did not identify any recognized or non-recognized subsequent events that would have required adjustment or disclosure in the consolidated financial statements, except as disclosed.disclosed (see note 11).

 

NoteNOTE 4 – Demand Loans PayableLOAN RECEIVABLE

During February 2017, the Company loaned $37,500 to a potential merger candidate, for working capital purposes. In March 2017, the Company withdrew its plan of merger and recorded an allowance for loan losses of $37,500 due to the loan deemed uncollectible.

NOTE 5 – SETTLEMENT PAYABLE

 

On January 24, 2013April 8, 2016, the Company entered into a family member of an officerSecurities Purchase Agreement (the “SPA”) with Attia Investments, LLC, a related party (the “Investor”). A shareholder of the Company advanced $15,000who previously owned in-excess of 5% of the Company’s common stock is the managing member of Attia Investments, LLC. Under the Agreement, we issued and sold to the Company.The proceedsInvestor, and the Investor purchased from the non-interest bearing advance were used for general operating expenses. As of December 31, 2015 and 2014, the Company is reflecting a liability of $15,000. The Company did not impute interest on the loan as it was deemed to be de minimus to the consolidated financial statements.

On January 30, 2015 an officer of a related party to the Company advanced $5,500 to the Company.The proceeds from the non-interest bearing advance were used for general operating expenses. The Company did not impute interest on the loan as it was deemed to be de minimus to the consolidated financial statements. On March 5, 2015, the loan was repaid.

F-11

Note 5 – Notes Payable

During June and July of 2015, the Company issued promissory notes in the aggregate principal amount of $17,500 to six lenders. The notes bore aggregate interest at 50%, calculated monthly, and matured August 1, 2015. If the notes are repaid within the first month, the lenders are to be repaid 50% interest on the notes (the “Original Issue Discount”), a minimum payment of $26,250. The Original Issue Discount was accreted to interest expense over the life of the notes. During August and September of 2015, the notes were repaid. Total interest paid on the notes amounted to $17,500.

Note 6 – Notes Payable – Related Party

On December 1, 2013, the Company issued a Senior Unsecured Noteus, Debentures in the principal amount of $2,433 to$87,500 for a shareholderpurchase price of the Company. The note bore$70,000, bearing interest at a rate of 5%0% per annum. Principalannum, with an original maturity on October 8, 2016, further extended to April 8, 2017.

Amendment

On March 16, 2017, the Company entered into an amendment to the SPA. The SPA was modified as follows:

The maturity date of the Debentures was extended to April 8, 2017;

The default interest rate was set at 18%.

As consideration for the amendment, the Company increased the principal amount on the Debentures from $65,000 to $86,875 and issued the Investor 218,750 shares of common stock with a fair value of $13,125. All remaining terms of the Debentures remained the same.

In accordance with ASC 470, since the present value of the cash flows under the new debt instrument was at least ten percent different from the present value of the remaining cash flows under the terms of the original debt instrument, the Company accounted for the amendment to SPA as a debt extinguishment. Accordingly, the Company wrote off the remaining debt discount on the original Debentures of $17,312. The Company recorded a loss on extinguishment of debt of $52,312 on the amendment date.

During the year ended December 31, 2017, the Company repaid $50,018 in principal and $2,982 in accrued interest on certain convertible notes to related parties. Upon repayment, derivative liabilities in the note was due and payable on the earlieramount of (i) June 30, 2015 and (ii) the date upon which the Company receives gross proceeds of any offering of indebtedness, equity securities, or other of no less than $500,000. During 2014, the Company received additional advances under the note totaling $53,725. At December 31, 2014 the$48,093 were reclassified to equity. The outstanding principal balance on the noteDebentures at December 31, 2017 was $56,158. Note$41,857.

The Debentures are secured by all assets of the Company. The Company was in default of the SPA, making the entire unpaid principal and interest due and payable. The Investor has initiated a claim against the Company for payment of a loan in default with a principal sum of $109,375. On April 27, 2018, the aggregateCompany accepted a settlement offer totaling approximately $115,375 in cash and 800,000 shares of $55,585 was repaid on March 6, 2015, at which time,stock. As such, the remaining outstanding principal and interest onCompany has reclassified the note payable-related party to settlement payable and accrued the estimated fair value of the settlement of $164,875. In connection with the settlement, the Company recorded a loss on settlement of debt of $119,653 in current period operations.

During year ended December 31, 2018, the amountCompany issued 800,000 shares of $2,577its common stock and paid $115,375 towards the Attia Investments, LLC settlement. As of December 31, 2018, the outstanding balance was forgiven and accounted for as contributed capital.$0.

F-15

 

Note 7

NOTE 6Convertible Notes PayableCONVERTIBLE NOTES PAYABLE

 

a)Senior Unsecured Convertible Notes

Convertible notes payable are comprised of the following:

  2018  2017 
Offering 3 $825,500  $825,500 
Offering 4  439,550   439,550 
Offering 5  200,000   200,000 
Offering 6  640,900   245,000 
Total  2,105,950   1,710,050 
Less: debt discount  (325)  (277,969)
Net $2,105,625  $1,432,081 

Offering 3, 4,5,6 (collectively referred to as “Offerings”):

 

During the years ended December 2014,31, 2018, 2017 and 2016, the Company issued Senior Unsecured Convertible Notes in the aggregate principal amountsold $425,450, $1,110,000 and $600,500, respectively, of $25,000. The notes bore interestUnits to investors. Each Unit was sold at a rateprice of 5%$10,000 per annum. PrincipalUnit and accrued interestconsisted of one (1) six (6) month, 18% convertible promissory note (36% on the notes was duean annual basis) with a face value of $10,000 and payable on the earlier of (i) September 12, 2015 and (ii) the date upon which the Company receives gross proceeds of any offering of indebtedness, equity securities, or other of no less than $200,000 (the “Qualified Financing”). The notes automatically convert at the effective time of a Qualified Financing under the same terms given to investors in the Qualified Financing. During the first quarter of 2015, the Company entered into a Qualified Financing and the notes became convertible. As per the terms of the Qualified Financing, the noteholders convertedfour year warrants exercisable for an aggregate number of $25,000 in principal and were issued 50,000 shares of common stock and 50,000 warrants entitlingequal to 50% of the holders to purchase one shareshares of common stock forinto which the Note is initially convertible, exercisable at a five-year periodprice of $0.10 per share. The Offerings Notes are due six months after the issuance of each note, as amended.

Each of the Notes is convertible at an exerciseinitial price equal to $0.06 per share. In addition, during the two month period commencing on each issuance of the Offering 3 Notes, as amended, the Notes will contain a look-back provision pursuant to which the Notes will be convertible at the lower of $0.06 or the lowest volume weighted average price of $0.60the Company’s common stock (the “VWAP”) during any 10 day period during such two (2) month period, provided however, in the event that the VWAP during any such ten (10) day period is less than $0.06, then the reset conversion price of the Notes shall be no lower than $0.03. The Notes also contain a reset provision to the same price as any future offering over the lifetime of the Notes in the event that the conversion or offering price of securities offered in such subsequent offering is less the Conversion Price of the Notes in this Offering. Notwithstanding the foregoing, in no event shall the Conversion Price be lower than $0.03 per share.

 

b)Senior Unsecured Convertible Notes

During 2014The conversion feature of the Company engaged in an offering (the “Offering”) of Series A 10% Senior Convertible PromissoryOfferings Notes issued during 2016 was accounted for in the aggregate principal amountprevious year initially as equity. The Company concluded the conversion feature of upthe Notes did not qualify as a derivative because there was no market mechanism for net settlement and they were not readily convertible to $300,000 with multiple investors (collectively, the “Convertible Notes”). During 2014, the Company received aggregate proceeds of $58,000 related to the offering.cash.

 

The ConvertibleCompany reassessed the conversion feature of the Offerings Notes containedissued during 2016 for derivative treatment during January 2017 and concluded its shares were readily convertible to cash based on the following termscurrent trading volume of the Company’s stock. Due to the fact that these convertible notes have an option to convert at a variable amount, they are subject to derivative liability treatment. The conversion feature was measured at fair value using a Black Scholes and conditions:Binomial model at the reassessment date and the period end. The conversion feature, when reassessed, gave rise to a derivative liability of $1,526,300. In accordance with ASC 815, $129,434 was charged to paid in-capital due to the fact a beneficial conversion feature was recorded on the original issue date. In addition the Company recorded a debt discount to the Notes of $90,153 relating to the fair value of the conversion option. The fair value of the conversion option on the date of issuance in excess of the face amount of the note was recorded to interest expense on the date of issuance.

 

·Maturing March through September 2016,

 

·Interest rate at 10% per annum, with interest payable at maturity,

 

·Until the effective time of a merger, the Convertible Notes shall be convertible at the option of the holder thereof into shares of membership interests in the Company based on a $10 million pre-conversion valuation. At the effective time of a merger, the Convertible Notes shall be automatically converted without any prior action by any holder into securities offered in a qualified financing at 20% discount to the qualified financing. For purposes of Note 6 (c) qualified financing means the sale for cash by the Company or any successor in interest to the Company by means of merger, share exchange, asset acquisition or otherwise, of equity or equity derivative securities (e.g., convertible indebtedness, preferred stock, warrants, etc.), or any combination thereof, generating aggregate gross proceeds of at least $1,500,000 (including the amount of any Notes which convert into securities issued in the qualified financing) as described herein, provided, that the Company shall effect a qualified transaction (e.g., merge, sell all or substantially all of its assets, etc.) substantially simultaneously with the consummation of such qualified financing.

 

 F-12F-16 

The conversion feature has been measured at fair value using a Black Scholes model at the assessment date and the period end. The conversion feature, when assessed, gave rise to a derivative liability of $322,250. In 2018, the Company recorded an aggregate debt discount to the Notes of $425,900 comprised of i) $322,250 relating to the fair value of the conversion option, which was recorded as a derivative liability ii) $63,013 of incurred issuance costs and iii) $152,243 allocated fair value of the issued warrants. The excess of derivative liability over net proceeds of the notes of $111,606 was charged to interest expense. The debt discounts are amortized ratably to interest expense over the term of the notes.

 

The Company evaluatedwill have the provisionsability to extend the Notes for an additional six (6) months (the “Extended Term”) and if so extended shall be referred to herein as the “Extended Notes”. The Extended Notes, upon maturity, will pay interest at a six (6) month rate of 18% (36% annualized) at the termination of the convertible notes periodicallyExtended Term. The Extended Notes, to determine whether anythe extent extended pursuant to their terms for the Extended Term, will carry an additional 50% warrant coverage (e.g. such warrant to be exercisable for an additional 50% of the provisions wouldnumber of shares into which the Extended Note is initially convertible (the “Extended Warrants”). The Extended Warrants shall be considered embedded derivatives that would require bifurcation. Becauseexercisable at a price equal to $0.10. The Extended Warrants will expire four (4) years from the underlying commonExtended Term and shall contain customary anti-dilution rights (for stock is thinly tradedsplits, stock dividends and sales of substantially all the Company’s assets) and the shares of common stock underlying the convertible notes were not readily convertible to cash. Thus,Extended Warrants will contain registration rights.

At December 31, 2018, the Company remeasured the fair value of the conversion option did not meetfeature of the net settlement requirementissued and would not be consideredoutstanding notes and accrued interest and determined the estimated fair value of the derivative liability of $2,773,654. The Company recorded a loss on change in fair value of derivative if freestanding. Accordingly,liabilities of $1,547,402 for the convertible notes did not contain an embedded conversion feature that must be bifurcated.year ended December 31, 2018.

 

During the third quarteryear ended December 31, 2018, the Company issued an aggregate of 2015,13,020,414 warrants to existing note holders at $0.10 per share for four years to extend the terms of maturing notes for six months. The fair value of the issued warrants, determined by the Black-Scholes model, of $1,109,829 was charged as a resultdebt discount and amortized over the extended term up to the note’s initial net proceeds of $1,089,460 and the excess of $20,369 was charged as a loss on extinguishment of debt.

During the year ended December 31, 2017, the Company issued warrants to acquire an aggregate of 11,883,331 shares of the Merger Agreement andCompany’s common stock at $0.10 per share for four years in connection with the extension of the above described notes. The determined fair value at the date of issuance of $890,372 was charged as loss on extinguishment of debt.

In addition, to the extent that any investor that acquires Units in these Offerings had previously acquired securities issued by the Company or its subsidiary in one of the two prior private offerings placed by the Placement Agent in 2015 (each a qualified financing (as defined)“Prior Offering”), which collectively raised gross proceeds of $1,510,000 (each an “Existing Investor”), the notes became convertible. AsCompany has agreed to provide additional consideration to each such Existing Investor as follows: (i) if the Existing Investor acquires Units in this Offering in an amount equal to fifty percent (50%) or greater than the amount the Existing Investor invested in a Prior Offering, such Existing Investor will receive (a) an additional 7.33 shares, as amended, (if the investor invested in the first Prior offering) or 9 shares, as amended, of the Company’s common stock (if the investor invested in the second Prior Offering) (each “Incentive Shares”); and (b) the exercise price of each of the warrants purchased by the Existing Investor will be reduced from $0.60 per share (if the investor invested in the first Prior Offering) or $0.72 per share (if the investor invested in the second Prior Offering) to $0.10 per share (the “Incentive Warrant Price Reduction”); and (ii) if the Existing Investor acquires Units in this Offering in an amount equal to less than fifty percent (50%) of the amount the Existing Investor invested in a Prior Offering, such Existing Investor will receive a pro-rata number of Incentive Shares and Incentive Warrant Price Reduction on only a pro-rata portion of the warrants acquired by the Existing Investor in the Prior Offering.

During the year ended December 31, 2017, the Company issued investors who invested in prior offerings 8,211,333 shares of common stock and reduced the exercise price of 954,083 warrants as per the terms above. The incentive shares were recorded as a debt discount of the qualified financing, the noteholders converted an aggregate of $58,000 in principal and $8,162 in accrued interest and were issued 124,566 shares of common stock. The conversion feature of the notes provides for an effective conversion price that is below market value$5,972 on the date of conversion. Such featureissuance based on the relative fair value of the shares.

F-17

Upon modification, it is normally characterizedrequired to analyze the fair value of the instruments, before and after the modification, recognizing the increase as a beneficial conversion feature.charge to the statement of operations. The Company analyzedcomputed the beneficial conversion featurefair value of the warrants directly preceding the modification and compared the fair value to that of the modified warrants with new terms. The Company recorded the increased value of the warrants of $37,329 to interest expense with an offsetting entry to additional paid in capital on the date of conversion and deemed it to be de minimus.the modification.

 

Debt under these obligations isAs part of the transactions, the Company incurred placement agent fees based on the aggregate gross proceeds raised during the year ended December 31, 2017, or $208,862, which were recorded as follows:debt discount for debt issuance costs. In addition, during the year ended December 31, 2017, the Company issued the placement agent warrants an aggregate of 3,219,106 common shares and was obligated to issue an additional 1,333,467 warrants (See Note 11). The placement agent warrants have an exercise price of $0.001 per share, have a seven (7) year term and vest immediately. In 2018, the Company issued placement agents warrants in aggregate of 9,854,512 with the same terms as 2017 for past advisory services. The fair value of $1,280,507 was charged to 2017 operations.

 

  December 31,
2015
  December 31,
2014
 
Convertible notes payable $        –  $83,000 
         
Less: current maturities     (25,000)
         
Convertible notes payable, net of Current maturities $  $58,000 

The Company was in default on convertible notes in the principle sum of $2,105,950 as of the date of this report. The convertible notes are secured by all assets of the Company. No defaults under the convertible notes have been called by any note holders.

 

Note 8NOTE 7Loans PayableLOANS PAYABLE - OfficersOFFICERS

 

During the year ended December 31, 2015current and in prior periods, one of the Company’s officers made non-interest bearing loans to the Company whichin the form of cash and payments to vendors on behalf of the Company. The loans are due on demand.demand and unsecured. As of December 31, 20152018 and 20142017, the Company is reflecting a liability of $33,648,$0 and $29,607,$9,941 respectively. The Company did not impute interest on the loan as it was deemed to be de minimusminimis to the consolidated financial statements.

 

Note 9NOTE 8Stockholders’ Deficit

There is not yet a viable market for the Company’s common stock to determine its fair value, therefore management is required to estimate the fair value to be utilized in the determining stock-based compensation costs. In estimating the fair value, management considers recent sales of its common stock to third parties. Considerable management judgment is necessary to estimate the fair value. Accordingly, actual results could vary significantly from management’s estimates.

Amendment to the Certificate of Incorporation

On August 19, 2015, the Company filed with the Secretary of State of the State of Nevada an amendment to its Certificate of Incorporation increasing the number of shares of common stock that the Company is authorized to issue from 25,000,000 shares of common stock, par value $0.00001 per share, to 100,000,000 shares of common stock, par value $0.001 per share. In addition the Company is authorized to issue 10,000,000 shares of preferred stock, par value $0.001 per share, issuable in series with rights, preferences, privileges and restrictions as determined by the Company’s board of directors. The amendment was approved by the written consent of the holders of a majority of the outstanding shares of common stock of the Company.

F-13

Sale of Common stock

During February and March 2015 (“Offering 1”), the Company sold $500,000 of Units to investors. Each Unit was sold at a price of $0.50 per Unit and consisted of one (1) share of common stock, par value $0.001 per share, and one (1) warrant entitling the holder to purchase one share of common stock for a five-year period at an exercise price of $0.60 per share. An aggregate of 1,000,000 shares and 1,000,000 warrants were issued to such investors. The placement agent received as compensation for its services $50,000 (10% commission) and warrants to purchase 50,000 Units at a price of $0.01 per Unit, with each Unit consisting of one share of common stock and one warrant to purchase a share of common stock at a price of $0.60 per Share. The value of the warrants was a direct cost of the private placement and has been recorded as an increase and decrease to additional paid in capital. In addition, the Company incurred legal and other miscellaneous costs in the amount of $14,263 related to the transaction, which were offset against equity.

During August and September 2015 (“Offering 2”), the Company sold 1,683,333 Units at a price of $0.60 per Unit. Each Unit consists of one share of Common Stock and a warrant to purchase one share of Common Stock. The warrants (the “Investor Warrants”) are exercisable for a period of five years at a purchase price of $0.72 per share of Common Stock. The investors in the closing collectively purchased 1,683,333 Units for total cash consideration of $1,010,000. The placement agent received as compensation for its services $101,000 (10% commission) and warrants to purchase 168,333 Units at a price of $0.60 per Unit, with each Unit consisting of one share of common stock and one warrant to purchase a share of common stock at a price of $0.60 per Share. The placement agent warrants are exercisable for a period of five years. The value of the warrants was a direct cost of the private placement and has been recorded as an increase and decrease to additional paid in capital. The placement agent also received payment of a 3% non-accountable expense allowance in the amount of $30,300. In addition the Company incurred legal and other miscellaneous costs in the amount of approximately $66,000 related to the transaction, which were offset against equity.STOCKHOLDERS’ DEFICIT

 

Common stock issued for services

In August 2017, the Company entered into an agreement with a consulting firm to provide investor and public relations services. As compensation for the services, the Company was to pay the consultant $30,000 and issue 750,000 restricted common shares. The term of the agreement was for three months. During the three months ended September 30, 2017, the Company canceled the agreement without any payment or obligation.

During the year ended December 31, 2015,2017, the Company grantedissued an aggregate of 250,000 4,300,000 restricted common shares to a consultantconsultants with a fair value of $150,000. The restricted$304,830. These shares vested immediately on the datesdate of issuance. The Company has recorded $150,000$304,830 in stock-based compensation expense for the year ended December 31, 2015,2017, which is a component of professional fees in the consolidated statements of operations. The shares were valued based on recent salesthe quoted closing trading price on the date of issuance.

During the year ended December 31, 2017, the Company issued an aggregate of 819,750 restricted common shares to a placement agent with a fair value of $126,287 (See Note 6). The shares were granted as compensation to the placement agent for Units sold in Offering 3 during the year ended December 31, 2017. The shares were valued based on the quoted closing trading price on the date of issuance.

Common stock issued with convertible notes

During the year ended December 31, 2017, the Company issued an aggregate of 8,211,333 restricted common shares to investors as part of a private placement of the Company’s debt and equity securities (See Note 6).

F-18

Common stock issued with convertible notes - related party

During the year ended December 31, 2017, the Company issued an aggregate of 218,750 restricted common shares to an investor related to the modification of the terms of an existing convertible note (See Note 5).

During year ended December 31, 2018, the Company issued 800,000 shares of its common stock and paid $115,375 towards the Attia Investments, LLC debt settlement. As of December 31, 2018, the outstanding debt obligation to independent qualified investors.Attia was $0.

Common stock issued in connection with settlement of vendor liabilities

During the year ended December 31, 2017, the Company issued an aggregate of 878,710 restricted common shares to vendors to settle liabilities in the amount of $83,479. The shares were valued based on the quoted closing trading price on the grant date. In connection with the settlement, the Company recorded a gain on settlement of vendor debt of $29,122.

Common stock issued in payment of interest on convertible notes payable

During the year ended December 31, 2017, the Company issued an aggregate of 4,833,000 restricted common shares in settlement of accrued interest on convertible notes payable in the amount of $289,980. The shares were valued based on the quoted closing trading price on the vesting date of $419,180. In connection with the settlement, the Company recorded the excess of fair value of common stock and settled interest as a reduction in the derivative liability.

During the year ended December 31, 2018, the Company issued an aggregate of 666,000 restricted common shares in settlement of accrued interest on convertible notes payable in the amount of $39,294. The shares were valued based on the quoted closing trading price on the vesting date of $58,189. In connection with the settlement, the Company recorded the excess of fair value of common stock and settled interest as a reduction in the derivative liability.

Common stock issued upon exercise of warrants

During the year ended December 31, 2018, the Company issued an aggregate of 6,429,917 restricted common shares upon exercise of warrants with net proceeds of $382,695.

 

Preferred Stock

 

The Company is authorized to issue up to 10,000,000 shares of preferred stock, par value $0.001 per share. No shares of its preferred stock are issued or outstanding.

 

2018 Amended and Restated Equity Incentive Plan

 

BeforeThe Board of Directors and stockholders of the Share Exchange, the Company’s board of directorsCompany adopted the 20152018 Amended and Restated Equity Incentive Plan (the “2015 Plan”),in December 2018, which was submitted toamended and approved by the shareholdersrestated from 2016, which reserves a total of the Company prior to the closing of the Share Exchange. The 2015 Plan provides for the issuance of up to 3,000,00070,000,000 shares of common stock as incentive awards granted to executive officers, key employees, consultants and directors. In addition, the Company assumed and adopted the 2015 Plan, and as described in Note 1, option holders under that plan will be granted New Options to purchase common stock of the Company. As of December 31, 2015 no options had been issuedCommon Stock for issuance under the 2015 Plan. No further options will be granted under the 20152018 Plan. If an incentive award granted under the 20152018 Plan expires, terminates, is unexercised or is forfeited, or if any shares are surrendered in connection with an incentive award, the shares subject to such award and the surrendered shares will become available for further awards under the 20152018 Plan.

F-19

 

Shares issued under the 20152018 Plan through the settlement, assumption or substitution of outstanding awards or obligations to grant future awards as a condition of acquiring another entity are not expected to reduce the maximum number of shares available under the 20152018 Plan. In addition, the number of shares of Common Stockcommon stock subject to the 20152018 Plan, any number of shares subject to any numerical limit in the 20152018 Plan, and the number of shares and terms of any incentive award are expected to be adjusted in the event of any change in our outstanding Common Stockcommon stock by reason of any stock dividend, spin-off, split-up, stock split, reverse stock split, recapitalization, reclassification, merger, consolidation, liquidation, business combination or exchange of shares or similar transaction.

F-14

Capital contribution

On December 9, 2014, as part of the recapitalization, the Company applied paragraph 505-10-S99-3 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification (formerly Topic 4B of the Staff Accounting Bulletins (“SAB”) (“SAB Topic 4B”) issued by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”), by reclassifying the LLC members’ capital account inclusive of capital contributions of $109,037 and the LLC’s accumulated losses of ($332,764) as As of December 9, 2014 to additional paid-in capital.31, 2018, 50,000,000 shares remain available for future issuance under the 2018 Plan.

 

Class A UnitsStock options issued for services

 

During the year ended December 31, 2014, IP Squared issued 698 Class A units to a consultant2017, the Company granted its Chief Executive Officer an aggregate of 7,000,000 stock options with an exercise price of $0.11 for services rendered.rendered, having a total grant date fair value of approximately $409,000. See below cancellation on December 1, 2018. 1,000,000 options vested immediately and expire in 2027; 1,500,000 options vest in the event that the average volume weighted average price of the Company’s common stock over any 10 day period is greater than or equal to $0.25 and expire in 2027; 1,500,000 options vest in the event that the average volume weighted average price of the Company’s common stock over any 10 day period is greater than or equal to $0.50 and expire in 2027; 1,500,000 options vest in the event that the average volume weighted average price of the Company’s common stock over any 10 day period is greater than or equal to $0.75 and expire in 2027; and 1,500,000 options vest in the event that the average volume weighted average price of the Company’s common stock over any 10 day period is greater than or equal to $1.00 and expire in 2027. 1,000,000 of the options contain only service conditions and will be expensed on a straight-line basis over the service period of the agreement. The units were fullyremaining options contain market conditions and are being expensed over the derived service period as computed by a Geometric Brownian pricing model. Stock compensation expense of $70,779 and $63,574 in 2018 and 2017, respectively, was recorded prior to cancellation.

During the year ended December 31, 2017, the Company granted its Chairman of the Board an aggregate of 5,250,000 stock options with an exercise price of $0.07 for services rendered, having a total grant date fair value of approximately $128,525. See below cancellation on December 1, 2018. 1,750,000 options vested immediately and expire in 2027; 1,750,000 options vest in the event that the average volume weighted average price of the Company’s common stock over any 10 day period is greater than or equal to $0.20 and expire in 2027; 1,750,000 options vest in the event that the average volume weighted average price of the Company’s common stock over any 10 day period is greater than or equal to $0.40 and expire in 2027; 1,750,000 of the options contain only service conditions and will be expensed on a straight-line basis over the dateservice period of issuance. the agreement. The remaining options contain market conditions and are being expensed over the derived service period as computed by a Geometric Brownian pricing model. Stock compensation expense of $118,330 and $163,784 in 2018 and 2017, respectively, was recorded prior to cancellation.

On December 1, 2018, the Company cancelled an aggregate of 22,150,000 previously granted options to members of the Company’s Board of Directors, including options previously granted to the CEO and Chairman. Concurrently, the Company granted its Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer and Board member 10,000,000, 20,000,000 and 20,000,000 (an aggregate of 50,000,000) stock options with an exercise price of $0.09 for services rendered.

The Company recorded $64,037considered the concurrent cancellation and issuance of consultant fees in connectionthe 2018 options as a modification under the guidance of ASC 718, Compensation – Stock Compensation. In accordance with such issuance. Thethe guidance, the Company determinedcalculated the incremental increase of the fair value of the equity–based payment based onnew 2018 options over the canceled options at the time of the modification, December 1, 2018. This incremental increase in fair value of the concurrent cancellation and issuance of the stock options amounted to $3,933,550 , which in accordance with the guidance is added to the original grant date fair value of the modified options in the amount of $273,457 (excluding previously recorded stock compensation expense). The aggregate fair value of the original grant date fair value and the incremental increase in fair value amounted to $4,207,007, which will be vested over the new terms of the 2018 options, with no adjustment to the stock compensation recorded just prior to the modification date.

F-20

The Company uses the Black-Scholes model to determine the fair value of awards granted that contain typical service conditions that affect vesting. The Company uses the consideration received which was more reliably measurable. Monte Carlo or Geometric Brownian model to determine the fair value of awards granted that contain complex features such as market conditions because the Company believes the method accounts for multiple embedded features and contingencies in a superior manner than a simple Black Scholes model. In other words, simple models such as Black-Scholes may not be appropriate in many situations given complex features and differing terms. In applying the Black-Scholes, Monte Carlo or Geometric Brownian option pricing models to options granted, the Company used the following assumptions:

 

  

For the

Year Ended

December 31,

2018

 For the
Year Ended
December 31,
2017
 
Risk free interest rate 2.842%  1.83-1.92% 
Dividend yield 0.00%  0.00% 
Expected volatility 237.76%  70.00-298.88% 
Expected life in years 5.5  10 
Forfeiture rate 0.00  0.00% 

Each holder of Class A units was entitled to one vote for each Class A unit held. Upon the Recapitalization, all of the then-outstanding Class A units were converted into shares of common stock. As of December 31, 2014,

Since the Company had no Class A units outstanding.limited trading history in 2017, volatility was determined by averaging volatilities of comparable companies in addition to its historical trading history. The Company determined in 2018 that it did have sufficient data to estimate the volatility using only the Company’s own historical stock prices as compared to comparable companies.

  

IP Squared Technologies Holdings, LLC Members’ Distributions

PriorThe Company uses the simplified method to the Recapitalization, in accordance with the LLC Agreement,calculate expected term of share options and similar instruments issued to employees as the Company distributeddoes not have sufficient historical exercise data to the holders of Class A units (hereafter referredprovide a reasonable basis upon which to estimate expected term. The contractual term is used as the members) pro rata net incomeexpected term for share options and similar instruments issued to non-employees and for options valued using the Monte Carlo or losses based upon the number of units held by the members.

Note 10 – Stock WarrantsGeometric Brownian model.

 

The following tables set forth information concerningis a summary of the Company's warrants outstanding as of, andCompany’s stock option activity during the yeartwo years ended December 31, 2015. No2018:

  Number of
Options
  Weighted
Average
Exercise Price
  Weighted
Average
Remaining
Contractual
Life
 
Outstanding-January 1, 2017  12,300,000  $0.11   5.94 
Granted  12,250,000   0.09   10.00 
Exercised         
Forfeited/Cancelled         
Outstanding – December 31, 2017  24,550,000  $0.10   7.03 
Granted  50,000,000   0.09   10.00 
Exercised         
Forfeited/Cancelled  (22,150,000)  0.10   8.39 
Outstanding – December 31, 2018  52,400,000  $0.09   9.72 
Exercisable – December 31, 2018  2,100,000  $0.09   5.11 

At December 31, 2018, the aggregate intrinsic value of options outstanding and exercisable was $3,000.

F-21

Stock-based compensation for stock options has been recorded in the consolidated statements of operations and totaled $2,606,982 and $450,413, for the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively.

As of December 31, 2018, stock-based compensation of $1,814,263 remains unamortized and is expected to be amortized over the weighted average remaining period of 4 months.

Warrants

The Company used the Black-Scholes model to determine the fair value of warrants were granted byduring the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017. In applying the Black-Scholes option pricing model to warrants granted, the Company prior to January 1, 2015:used the following assumptions:

 

  Shares Underlying Warrants  Weighted Average Exercise Price  Aggregate Intrinsic Value 
Outstanding at December 31, 2014    $  $        – 
             
Granted  2,951,669   0.66    
Expired         
Exercised         
Cancelled         
Outstanding and exercisable at December 31, 2015  2,951,669  $0.66  $ 
  Year Ended
December 31,
2018
  Year Ended
December 31,
2017
 
Risk free interest rate  1.93 – 2.96%   1.10 – 2.14% 
Dividend yield  0.00%   0.00% 
Expected volatility  170.30-279.23%   65.32 –316.98% 
Contractual term (years)  4-7   3.1 - 5 

The following is a summary of the Company’s warrant activity during the two years ended December 31, 2018:

  Number of
Warrants
  Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price
  Weighted
Average
Remaining
Contractual
Life
 
Outstanding - January 1, 2017  8,956,677  $0.20   3.65 
Granted  27,348,692   0.09   4.11 
Exercised         
Forfeited/Cancelled         
Outstanding – December 31, 2017  36,305,369  $0.11   3.74 
Granted  29,242,717   0.08   4.01 
Exercised  (6,429,917)  0.10    
Forfeited/Cancelled         
Outstanding and Exercisable – December 31, 2018  59,118,169  $0.10   3.76 

At December 31, 2018, the aggregate intrinsic value of warrants outstanding and exercisable was $1,286,626. 

F-22

 

The following is additional information with respect to the Company's warrants as of December 31, 2015:2018:

 

Number of Warrants Range of Exercise Price Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Life (In Years)
2,951,669 $0.01 - $0.72 4.54
2,951,669    
Number of
Warrants
  Exercise
Price
  Weighted Average
Remaining
Contractual Life
(In Years)
  Currently
Exercisable
 
 14,074,453  $0.001   6.34   14,074,453 
 50,000  $0.01   1.18   50,000 
 1,000,000  $0.06   3.28   1,000,000 
 37,981,756  $0.10   2.92   37,981,756 
 1,000,000  $0.12   3.28   1,000,000 
 1,000,000  $0.18   3.28   1,000,000 
 2,818,625  $0.25   3.75   2,818,625 
 418,333  $0.60   1.35   418,333 
 775,002  $0.72   1.62   775,002 
 59,118,169           59,118,169 

In April 2017, in exchange for services rendered by a third party, the Company issued 1,000,000, 1,000,000 and 1,000,000 warrants to purchase shares of the Company’s common stock with exercise prices of $0.06 per share, $0.12 and $0.18 per share, respectively that vested immediately. The fair value on the grant date of the warrants was $112,717 was charged to operations as services.

During the year ended December 31, 2017, the Company issued an aggregate of 9,246,257 warrants to purchase the Company’s common stock at $0.10 per share, expiring four years from issuance, in connection with the issuance of convertible notes payable. In addition, the Company issued 3,219,106 warrants to purchase the Company’s common stock at $0.001 per share, expiring seven years from issuance for placement agent services.

During the year ended December 31, 2017, the Company issued an aggregate of 11,883,329 warrants to purchase the Company’s common stock at $0.10 per share, expiring four years from issuance, in connection with the six month extension of previously issued convertible notes payable. The fair value on the grant date of the warrants was $767,936 was charged to operations as loss on extinguishment of debt.

During the year ended December 31, 2018, the Company issued an aggregate of 3,549,166 warrants to purchase the Company’s common stock at $0.10 per share, expiring four years from issuance, in connection with the issuance of convertible notes payable. In addition, the Company issued 9,854,512 warrants to purchase the Company’s common stock at $0.001 per share, expiring seven years from issuance for placement agent services valued at $1,280,507.

During the year ended December 31, 2018, the Company issued an aggregate of 2,818,625 warrants to purchase the Company’s common stock at $0.25 per share, expiring four years from issuance, in connection with the exercise of warrants (see below).

During the year ended December 31, 2018, the Company issued an aggregate of 13,020,414 warrants to purchase the Company’s common stock at $0.10 per share, expiring four years from issuance, in connection with the six month extension of previously issued convertible notes payable. The fair value on the grant date of the warrants was $1,109,829 was charged as a debt discount up to the initial proceeds of the related notes and excess to operations as loss on extinguishment of debt.

 

 F-15F-23 

During the year ended December 31, 2018, the Company reduced previously issued warrants exercisable at $0.10 per share to $0.06 per share as an inducement to exercise. In addition, as part of the exercise of the warrant, the holder would receive one Series B warrant (exercisable at $0.25 per share, expiring four years from issuance -see above) for every four warrants exercised. As of December 31, 2018, the Company issued 6,429,917 shares of common stock for warrant exercises with net proceeds of $382,695. The Company accounted for the transaction under inducement accounting and accounted for the price reduction of $0.04 per share and the fair value of the Series B warrants as inducement expense in the amount of $734,273. In addition, the Company has received net proceeds of $287,575 for the exercise of 4,844,583 additional warrants of which the shares were not issued until after December 31, 2018.

 

Note 11NOTE 9Commitments and ContingenciesCOMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

Employment Agreements

On August 13, 2015 the Company entered into an employment agreement with Joshua Partridge as the Company’s Head of Business Development and Secretary. The agreement calls for a three year term, an annual salary of $120,000 per annum with annual 10% increases and a payment upon termination in an amount equal to any and all unpaid salary through the end of the term. On September 10, 2015, the Company entered into a new employment agreement with Mr. Partridge solely to reflect Mr. Partridge’s new position as the Company’s Chief Operating Officer.

On August 13, 2015 the Company entered into an employment agreement with William Gorfein as the Company’s Chief Executive Officer. The agreement calls for a three year term, an annual salary of $120,000 per annum with annual 10% increases and a payment upon termination in an amount equal to any and all unpaid salary through the end of the term.

On August 31, 2015 the Company entered into an employment agreement with Charles Gonsher as the Company’s Chief Accounting Officer. The agreement called for a two year term, an annual salary of $90,000 per annum. In addition, Mr. Gonsher was to be granted an option to purchase 240,000 shares of the Company’s common stock. As of December 31, 2015 the terms of the options were not finalized. On February 18, 2016 Mr. Gonsher’s employment agreement was terminated.

Consulting Agreement

On August 24, 2015, the Company entered into a consulting agreement whereby the consultant agreed to provide investor and public relations services to the Company for a period of two months. As compensation for the services, the Company will pay the consultant a monthly fee of $20,000 and the Company shall issue 100,000 shares of the Company common stock.

On November 23, 2015, the agreement was amended and extended for a period of an additional two months beginning on November 23, 2015. As compensation for the services, the Company will pay the consultant a monthly fee of $20,000 and the Company shall issue 150,000 shares of the Company common stock.

The Company recorded stock compensation expense relating to the agreements of approximately $150,000, during the year ended December 31, 2015.

Registration Rights Agreement

All of the securities issued in connection with Offering 1, Offering 2 and the Share Exchange (collectively the “Transactions”) are “restricted securities,” and as such are subject to all applicable restrictions specified by federal and state securities laws. In connection with Offering 1, Offering 2 and the Share Exchange, the Company entered into registration rights agreements with all of its shareholders. Under the terms of the registration rights agreements, the Company has committed to file a registration statement covering the resale of (i) all shares of common stock outstanding as of August 14, 2015, the closing date of the Share Exchange; (ii) all of the shares of common stock underlying the Investor Warrants in Offering 2 and the warrants that were included in the Offering 1 units; (iii) all of the shares issuable upon exercise of the placement agent warrants (and the shares underlying the warrants issuable upon exercise of such placement agent warrants) issued in Offering 1 and Offering 2 within 60 days from August 14, 2015 (the “Filing Deadline”), and shall use commercially reasonable efforts to cause the registration statement to become effective no later than 90 days after it is filed (the “Effective Deadline”).

The Company has agreed to use reasonable efforts to maintain the effectiveness of the registration statement through the one year anniversary of the date the registration statement is declared effective by the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC’), or until Rule 144 of the Securities Act is available to investors in the Offering with respect to all of their shares, whichever is earlier.

The holders of any registrable securities removed from the Registration Statement a result of a Rule 415 or other comment from the SEC shall have “piggyback” registration rights for the shares of Common Stock or Common Stock underlying such warrants with respect to any registration statement filed by the Company following the effectiveness of the registration statement which would permit the inclusion of these shares. As of the date of the filing of this report the registration statement has not been filed. The registration rights agreements do not contain a penalty clause for the failure to file a registration statement within the period agreed upon. However, we do not exclude the possibility that our shareholders may bring litigations against us in connection with claims arising out of our failure to file a registration statement pursuant to the registration rights agreements and seek remedies under the common law.

F-16

 

Litigations, Claims and Assessments

 

In the normal course of business, theThe Company may be involved in legal proceedings, claims and assessments arising in the ordinary course of business. Such matters are subject to many uncertainties, and outcomes are not predictable with assurance. There are no such matters other than described above that are deemed material to the consolidated financial statements as of December 31, 20152018 and 2014.2017.

 

Operating LeasesEmployment Agreements

On February 21, 2017, the Company entered into an employment agreement with an individual, pursuant to which, commencing March 6, 2017, the individual will serve as the Interim Chief Executive Officer of the Company and, commencing 90 days thereafter, shall serve as Chief Executive Officer of the Company through March 5, 2019, subject to extension as provided in the employment agreement, and be appointed to the Board of Directors. The agreement calls for an annual salary of $250,000 per annum and a bonus in the amount of 10% of all incremental gross revenue generated by the Company, which bonus shall be determined and be payable quarterly. In addition, pursuant to the employment agreement, the Company granted to the individual certain stock options (See Note 9).

On March 6, 2017, William Gorfein resigned as the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and was named the Company’s Chief Strategy Officer and Principal Financial Officer. No changes were made to Mr. Gorfein’s existing employment agreement.

On November 26, 2019, Walter Ray Colwell resigned as Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”) of PeerLogix, Inc. (the “Company”). No changes were made to the Company’s management after Mr. Colwell’s resignation.

Payroll Tax Liabilities

As of December 31, 2018, and through the date of this report, the Company has not filed certain federal and state income and payroll tax returns nor has it paid the payroll tax amounts and related interest and penalties relating to such returns. Payroll tax amounts due as of December 31, 2018, were $19,127 and penalties and interest are estimated to be $10,924 and $10,118 as of December 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively which have been included in other accrued liabilities at December 31, 2018 and 2017 in the accompanying consolidated Balance Sheets.

Placement Agent and Finders Agreements

In 2016 and 2017, the Company entered into a Financial Advisory and Investment Banking Agreements with WestPark Capital, Inc. (“WestPark”) (the “WestPark Advisory Agreements”). Pursuant to the WestPark Advisory Agreement, WestPark shall act as the Company’s financial advisor and placement agent in connection with a best efforts private placement (the “Financing”) of the Company’s debt and/or equity securities (the “Securities”).

F-24

 

The Company, has an operating lease for its New York office facility under a month-to-month agreement. Beginning in October 2015, due to an increase in office space,upon each closing of the CompanyFinancing will pay monthly rental paymentsconsideration to WestPark, in cash, a fee in an amount equal to 10% of $9,600.the aggregate gross proceeds raised in the Financing from the sale of Securities placed by WestPark and warrants in the amount of 10% of the aggregate gross proceeds. The Company will receivealso pay all WestPark legal fees and expenses as well as a discounted monthly rate3% non-accountable expense allowance of $6,663 for the period October 2015 through January 2016. Prior to October 2015, the Company’s monthly rental payment was approximately $2,500. The Company’s monthly rental amountaggregate gross proceeds raised in the past fluctuated based on space needed each month. Rent expense forFinancing. The Placement Agent Warrants will have: (a) a nominal exercise price of $0.001 per share, (b) a seven year term, and (c) a cashless exercise provision. The shares underlying the yearsPlacement Agent Warrants will have standard piggyback registration rights.

During the year ended December 31, 20152017, in addition to the cash fees, the Company issued 1,319,750 shares and 2014 totaled $33,125 and $8,121, respectively.3,219,106 warrants to acquire the Company’s common stock at $0.001 per share for seven years as placement agent fees as per the terms of the WestPark Advisory Agreements. In addition, as of December 31, 2017, the Company is obligated to issue an additional 1,333,467 warrants for placement agent fees with an exercise price of $0.001, expiring seven years from issuance date. In 2018, the Company issued placement agents warrants in aggregate of 9,854,512 with the same terms as 2017 for past advisory services. The fair value of $1,280,507 was charged to current year operations.

 

Note 12NOTE 10Income TaxesINCOME TAXES

 

The tax effects of temporary differences that give rise to deferred tax assets as of December 31, 20152018 and 20142017 are presented below:

Prior to the Recapitalization in December 2014, the Company was a Delaware limited liability company that passed through income and losses to its members. As a result, the Company was not subject to any U.S. federal or state income taxes as the related tax consequences were reported by the individual members.

 

The income tax provision (benefit) consists of the following:

  

 December 31, 
 2015  2014  2018 2017 
Federal                
Current       $  $ 
Deferred  492,800   8,300   (691,673)  (94,974)
State and local                
Current            
Deferred  146,500   2,500   (310,405)  (42,630)
Change in valuation allowance  (639,300)  (10,800)  (1,002,078)  137,604 
Income tax provision (benefit)       $  $ 

 

The reconciliation between the statutory federal income tax rate and the Company’s effective rate for the years ended December 31, 20152018 and 20142017 is as follows:

 

 2015  2014  2018  2017 
U.S. Federal statutory rate  (34.0%)  (34.0%)  (21.0%)  (34.0%)
State tax benefit, net of federal tax  (10.11)  (10.11)
State tax, net of federal tax benefit  (9.4)  (9.4)
Federal tax rate change  0.0   10.9 
Stock based compensation  13.5   8.9 
Non-deductible interest expense  16.3   27.9 
Other permanent differences  2.07      5.8   (7.0)
Change in valuation allowance  42.04   44.11   (5.2)  2.7 
Income tax provision (Benefit)  0.0%   0.0%   0.0%   0.0% 

 

 F-17F-25 

 

As of December 31, 20152018 and 20142017 the deferred tax assetassets consisted of the following:

  

 2015  2014  2018  2017 
Deferred Tax Asset     
Deferred Tax Assets:        
Net operating loss carryovers $650,100  $10,800  $809,873  $1,269,504 
Total deferred tax asset  650,100   10,800   809,873   1,269,504 
Valuation allowance  (650,100)  (10,800)  (809,873)  (1,269,504)
Net Deferred Tax Asset, net of valuation allowance $  $  $  $ 

 

The Company filesis required to file its income tax returns in the U.S. federal jurisdiction and the state of New York and such returns are subject to examination by tax authorities. Tax returns for the years ended December 31, 2016, 2017 and 2018 remain open to Internal Revenue Service and State audits.

 

The Company is in the process of filinghas not filed its federal and state tax returns for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017, 2016, 2015, 2014, 2013 and 2014.2012. The Net operating losses (“NOLs”) for these years will not be available to reduce future taxable income until the returns are filed. Assuming these returns are filed, as of December 31, 2015,2018, the Company had approximately $1.474$3.8 million of federal and state net operating losses that may be available to offset future taxable income. The net operating loss carryforwards will begin to expire in 20342035 unless utilized. In accordance with Section 382 of the Internal Revenue Code, deductibility of the Company’s U.S. net operating carryovers may be subject to an annual limitation in the event of a change of control as defined the regulations. A Section 382 analysis has not been prepared and the Company’s NOLs could be subject to limitation.

 

The Company assesses the likelihood that deferred tax assets will be realized. To the extent that realization is not likely, a valuation allowance is established.  Based upon the Company’s losses since inception, management believes that it is more likely than not that the future benefits of its deferred tax assets will not be realized and has therefore established a full valuation allowance.

 

Note 13 – Related Party TransactionsManagement will be taking on a project to file delinquent federal and state tax returns in the upcoming reporting periods and updated values will be disclosed in the following reporting periods.

 

On March 9, 2015,December 22, 2017, new legislation was signed into law, informally titled the Company engagedTax Cuts and Jobs Act, which included, among other things, a provision to reduce the federal corporate income tax rate to 21%.  Under ASC 740, Accounting for Income Taxes, the enactment of the Tax Act also requires companies, to recognize the effects of changes in tax laws and rates on deferred tax assets and liabilities and the retroactive effects of changes in tax laws in the period in which the new legislation is enacted. There is no further change to its assertion on maintaining a full valuation allowance against its U.S. deferred tax assets. The Company’s gross deferred tax assets have been revalued from 34% to 21% with a lead generationcorresponding offset to the valuation allowance and presales outsourcing firm, Corporate Rain International (“CRI”). Tim Askew,any potential other taxes arising due to the Tax Act will result in reductions to its net operating loss carryforward and valuation allowance. Deferred tax assets of approximately $1,800,000 have been revalued to approximately $1,200,000 with a member ofcorresponding decrease to the Company’s Board of Directors, isvaluation allowance. Therefore, there was no net impact on the founder and CEO of CRI. CRI will be compensated $6,000 per month along with a flat commission of $500Company’s financial statements for each customer referred by CRI to the Company per the terms of the engagement.The Company recorded compensation expense to CRI of $30,000 during the year ended December 31, 2015. As of December 31, 2015, the Company had an outstanding balance due to CRI of $6,000.2018.

As of December 31, 2015, the Company and CRI suspended the engagement to reassess sales strategies.

 

Note 14NOTE 11Subsequent EventsSUBSEQUENT EVENTS

Financing ActivityIncrease in Authorized Shares

 

On January 28, 2016,April 16, 2019, our board of directors approved, and the Company entered into a Securities Purchase Agreement (“SPA”), Promissory Note (the “January Note”) and Registration Rights Agreement (“RRA”) (collectively,company effectuated an amendment to Article THIRD of our Certificate of Incorporation to increase the “Transaction Documents”) with Pinewood Trading Fund, L.P. (“Pinewood”). Pursuant to the SPA, the Company sold 100,000number of authorized shares (the “Shares”) of itsour common stock (the “Common Stock”), in exchange for Pinewood lending $105,000 (“Funding Amount”)from 100,000,000 shares to the Company pursuant to the January Note with a principal amount350,000,000 shares. The number of $131,250 (“Principal Amount”).The January Note is due on July 28, 2016 or earlier in the event that the gross proceedsshares of any Company offering equals or exceeds $300,000.The January Note is secured by all assets of the Company.authorized preferred stock remains unchanged at 10,000,000.

 

Under the terms of the RRA with Pinewood, the Company committed to file a registration statement on or prior to March 31, 2016 or any additional registration statements which may be required pursuant to the terms of the RRA on or prior to the earliest practical date (“Filing Date”), covering, among other things, the resale of all or such portion (as permitted by SEC Guidance and Rule 415) of all of the Shares and any shares of Common Stock issued or issuable upon any stock split, dividend or other distribution, recapitalization or similar event with respect to the Shares (the “Registrable Securities”) on such Filing Date that are not then registered on an effective registration statement. The Company has agreed to use its commercially reasonable best efforts to cause the registration statement to be declared effective under the Securities Act as promptly as practicable after the filing thereof, and use its commercially reasonable best efforts to keep such registration statement continuously effective under the Securities Act until all Registrable Securities covered by such registration statement have been sold, or may be sold without volume restrictions pursuant to Rule 144, as determined by the counsel to the Company pursuant to a written opinion letter to such effect, addressed and acceptable to the Company’s transfer agent and the Holder (the “Effectiveness Period”).

 

 F-18F-26 

 

IfFinancing

Subsequent to year end, the Company fails to file the registration statement on or prior to the Filing Date, or fails to maintain the effectiveness of the registration statement pursuant to the terms of the RRA, the Company may be subject to partial cash liquidated damages, and not as a penalty, equal to $2,500 per month (not to exceedentered into convertible notes worth an aggregate of $20,000), pro-rated$331,668 with eleven investors. The note maturities range from six months to one year and carry interest rates ranging from 12.5% to 18%. The conversion feature embedded in the convertible note is accounted for periodsas a derivative liability with adjustments to the fair value of less than 30 days. Ifthe liability charged to the income statement. In connection with the convertible notes, the Company fails to pay any partial liquidated damages in full within seven (7) days after the date payable,issued an aggregate of 7,625,000 warrants exercisable at $0.10 per share.

Interest Conversion

In first quarter 2019, the Company will payissued an aggregate of 1,419,900 shares of common stock to 10 investors for partial conversion of interest thereonon outstanding convertible notes of $85,194 at a ratethe conversion price of 18%$0.06 per annum (or such lesser maximum amount that is permitted to be paid by applicable law) to Pinewood, accruing daily fromshare stated in the date such partial liquidated damages are due until such amounts, plus all such interest thereon, are paid in full. As of the date of the filing of this report the registration statement has not been filed.note agreement.

 

On April 8, 2016 (the “Initial Closing Date”), weSettlement Agreement with Investor

The Company and Attia entered into a Securities Purchase Agreement (the “Agreement”) with Attia Investments, LLC, a related party (the “Investor”). A shareholder ofsettlement agreement on April 16, 2018 that required the Company who owns in-excessto pay cash, issue 800,000 unregistered shares of 5% of the Company’s common stock isand to timely file a registration statement to register the managing member of Attia Investments, LLC. Under800,000 shares. On July 7, 2020 the Agreement, the Investor agreed to purchase senior secured convertible debentures in the aggregate principal amount of up to $125,000 (together the “Debentures” and each individual issuance a “Debenture”), bearing interest at a rate of 0% per annum, with maturity on October 8, 2016, extended to April 8, 2017 at the discretion of the Investor. The principal amount of the Debentures shall equal the amount funded by the Investor together with an original issue discount of 20%. The Debentures are secured by all assets of the Company.

On the Initial Closing Date, weCompany issued and sold to the Investor, and the Investor purchased from us, a first Debenture in the principal amount of $68,750 for a purchase price of $55,000. $13,750 was recorded as an original issue discount and will be accreted over the life of the note to interest expense.

The principal amount of the Debentures can be converted at the option of the Investor into2,250,000 unregistered shares of our common stock, atwith a conversion pricevalue of $0.03 per share of the lower of (i) $0.05 or (ii)based on the price per share on the date of issuance, in an offeringlieu of securities prior to the maturity date. In order to induce Investors to investfiling a registration statement as stated in the Debentures,settlement agreement, thus satisfying the Investors will beoriginal requirement to register the shares. . As of July 7, 2020, the company has fully satisfied the 2018 settlement agreement and has no further obligation to Attia.

Departure of Chief Executive Officer

On November 26, 2019, Walter Ray Colwell tendered his resignation as Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”) of PeerLogix, Inc. (the “Company”). Mr. Colwell’s employment agreement was terminated, however Mr. Colwell retained his options. The Company’s Principal Financial Officer, William Gorfein, assumed the role of CEO upon Mr. Colwell’s departure.

Salary Conversion

In first quarter 2019, the Company issued two4,012,185 shares of Company common stock in exchange for each $1.00 invested.the forgiveness and dismissal of $361,097 of accrued and unpaid salary and board fees owed to one of the Company’s directors. The shares had a fair value of $0.09 per share on the date of grant.

 

The Agreement provides that,Stock option Cancellation and Issuance

On July 9, 2020, the shares of Company common stock andcancelled 30,000,000 stock options held by William Gorfein, CEOwith an original grant date of December 1, 2018 and Joshua Partridge, COO (the “Founders Shares”), together with medallion guaranteed stock powers relating thereto, shall be placed into an escrow account established by the Investor and shall be held pending a determination by the Boardexercise price of Directors, in consultation with the Investor, of the status of the operations$0.09 per share issued to two directors of the Company. Within 45 days followingOn the Initial Closing Datesame day, the Company shall delivergranted to the escrow agentsame two directors 50,000,000 stock options with exercise price of $0.05 per share with a written notice which shall state that the board of directorsten-year term. Fifty percent of the Company,options vest immediately, twenty five percent in consultationsix months from grant date and agreementtwenty five percent in one year from grant date. The cancellation and issuance of the stock options will be treated as an option modification. The old options will be valued on the day before the cancellation and will be compared to the value of the new options with the Investor, have made one ofcorresponding difference recorded in the following determinations:income statement.

 

(a)adequate funding, on terms and conditions acceptable to both the Company and the Investor, is made available to the Company and is sufficient to ensure that the Company can execute its business plan; or
(b)such funding is not available to the Company, in which case the Company intends to structure a transaction as a result of which either (i) the shares of the Company and a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company, and the operations thereof shall be returned to the CEO and COO and the Founders Shares shall be cancelled, but the Company shall be entitled to a 10% royalty on sales generated by such operation for five years or (ii) the operations thereof shall be sold to a third party, and the CEO and COO shall become employees thereof or, if not so employed, the unemployed individual shall accept from the Company a cash payment in lieu of such employment equal to $25,000.

 

The Company can give no assurance that such funding will be available on terms and conditions acceptable to both the Company and the Investor, or at all.

 

 F-19F-27 

 

Warrant repricing and exercise agreement

In 2019, the Company entered into a warrant repricing and exercise agreement with certain warrant holders of the Company. Pursuant to the agreement the Company offered existing warrant holders the opportunity to exercise all or a portion of their existing warrants into amended warrants with a revised exercise price of $0.06 per share. Simultaneously with execution of the warrant and repricing and exercise agreement the holders of the amended warrants agreed to exercise a portion of those warrants. As added consideration the Company issued an aggregate of 1,211,146 Series B warrants to the above warrant holders.

Paycheck Protection Program

The COVID-19 Aid, Relief and Economic Security Act (CARES Act) was signed into law on March 27, 2020 and provided for, among other things, the Payroll Protection Program (PPP). The CARES Act temporarily added the PPP Loan program to the U.S. Small Business Administration’s (SBA) 7(a) Loan Program and provides for the forgiveness of up to the full amount of qualifying loan plus accrued interest guaranteed under the program. The Company applied for and received on April 23, 2020, through a bank, $35,800 under this program. The loan provides for an annual interest rate of 1% and a term of two years from the date the proceeds were received. Payments of principal and interest are deferred for the first six months of the loan period.

F-28

SIGNATURES

 

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

 

 

 

PeerLogix, Inc.

 

By:/s/ William Gorfein

      William Gorfein

      ChiefPrincipal Executive and Financial Officer

 

 

Dated: April 14, 2016December 18, 2020

 

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

 

SignatureTitleDate
 
/S/William GorfeinChief Executive Officer and DirectorApril 14, 2016
William Gorfein(Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer)
/S/Joshua PartRidgeChief Operating Officer and DirectorApril 14, 2016
Joshua Partridge  
   
/S/ Kevin Richardsons/William GorfeinChairman of the BoardPrincipal Executive and Financial OfficerApril 14, 2016December 18, 2020
Kevin Richardson  
   
/S/ Timothy Askews/ Kevin RichardsonDirectorChairman of the BoardApril 14, 2016December 18, 2020
Timothy AskewKevin Richardson  

 

 4529