United States Securities and Exchange Commission
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-K
(Mark One)
(x)ANNUAL REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
 FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 20082009

(  )TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
 
FOR THE TRANSITION PERIOD FROM                                                                                      TO                      

Commission File Number    0-1665
Commission File Number 0-1665
DCAP GROUP,KINGSTONE COMPANIES, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Delaware36-2476480
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

11581154 Broadway, Hewlett, New York11557
(Address of principal executive offices)(Zip Code)

(516) 374-7600
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
Title of each class
Name of each exchange on which regisregistteredered
Common StockNASDAQ

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
None

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.     Yes __  No X

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Exchange Act.     Yes __  No X

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.      Yes XNo __

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. __

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company.  See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer”” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filer __Accelerated filer __
  
Non-accelerated __ (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
Smaller reporting company  X

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).  Yes __ No X

As of June 30, 2008,2009, the aggregate market value of the registrant’s common stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant was $1,155,744$2,577,122 based on the closing sale price as reported on the NASDAQ Capital Market.  As of March 20, 2009,25, 2010, there were 2,972,7463,038,511 shares of common stock outstanding.

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
None

 
 
 

 

INDEX

  Page No.
Forward-Looking Statements1
PART I
  
Item 1.Business.2
Item 1A.Risk Factors.9
16
Item 1B.Unresolved Staff Comments.9
16
Item 2.Properties.10
16
Item 3.Legal Proceedings.10
16
Item 4.Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders.10
Reserved.  16
PART II
  
Item 5.Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities.11
17
Item 6.Selected Financial Data.12
18
Item 7.Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.12
18
Item 7A.Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.27
42
Item 8.Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.27
42
Item 9.Changes in and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure.27
42
Item 9A.Controls and Procedures.27
42
Item 9B.Other Information.29
44
PART III
  
Item 10.Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance.30 
45
Item 11.Executive Compensation.33
49
Item 12.Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters.35
52
Item 13.Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence.37
54
Item 14.Principal Accountant Fees and Services.40
58
PART IV
  
Item 15.Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules.41
60
Signatures  

 
 
 

 

PART I
 
Forward-Looking Statements
 
This Annual Report contains forward-looking statements as that term is defined in the federal securities laws.  The events described in forward-looking statements contained in this Annual Report may not occur.  Generally these statements relate to business plans or strategies, projected or anticipated benefits or other consequences of our plans or strategies, projected or anticipated benefits from acquisitions to be made by us, or projections involving anticipated revenues, earnings or other aspects of our operating results.  The words “may,” “will,” “expect,” “believe,” “anticipate,” “project,” “plan,” “intend,” “estimate,” and “continue,” and their opposites and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements.  We caution you that these statements are not guarantees of future performance or events and are subject to a number of uncertainties, risks and other influences, many of which are beyond our control, that may influence the accuracy of the statements and the projections upon which the statements are based.  Factors which may affect our results include, but are not limited to, the risks and uncertainties discussed in Item 7 of this Annual Report under “Factors That May Affect Future Results and Financial Condition”.
 
Any one or more of these uncertainties, risks and other influences could materially affect our results of operations and whether forward-looking statements made by us ultimately prove to be accurate.  Our actual results, performance and achievements could differ materially from those expressed or implied in these forward-looking statements.  We undertake no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether from new information, future events or otherwise.
 

1
 
1

 

ITEM 1.                      BUSINESS.
 
(a)           Business Development
 
General
 
OurAs used in this Annual Report on Form 10-K (the “Annual Report”), references to the “Company”, “we”, “us”, or “our” refer to Kingstone Companies, Inc. (“Kingstone”) and its subsidiaries.
On July 1, 2009, we completed the acquisition of 100% of the issued and outstanding common stock of Kingstone Insurance Company (“KICO”) (formerly known as Commercial Mutual Insurance Company (“CMIC”)) pursuant to the conversion of CMIC from an advance premium cooperative to a stock property and casualty insurance company. Pursuant to the plan of conversion, we acquired a 100% equity interest in KICO in consideration for the exchange of $3,750,000 principal amount of surplus notes of CMIC. In addition, we forgave all accrued and unpaid interest of approximately $2,246,000 on the surplus notes as of the date of conversion. 
Effective July 1, 2009, we now offer property and casualty insurance products to small businesses and individuals in New York State through our subsidiary, KICO. The effect of the KICO acquisition is only included in our results of operations and cash flows for the period from July 1, 2009 through December 31, 2009. Accordingly, discussions pertaining to KICO will only include the six months ended December 31, 2009.
Until December 2008, our continuing operations consist of franchising storefront insurance agencies under the DCAP brand name and earning placement fees based upon premium finance contracts purchased, assumed and serviced by the purchaser of our loan portfolio on February 1, 2008.
Our discontinued operations consistprimarily consisted of the ownership and operation of storefront19 insurance agencies under the DCAP,brokerage and agency storefronts, including 12 Barry Scott locations in New York State, three Atlantic Insurance locations in Pennsylvania, and four Accurate Agency brand names and premium financing of insurance policies for such agency clients as well as clients of non-affiliated entities.
locations in New York State. In December 2008, due to declining revenues and profits, we made a decision to restructure our network of retail offices (the “Retail Business”). The plan of restructuring called for the closing of seven of our least profitable locations during December 2008 and the sale of the remaining 19 Retail Business locations.  On March 30,April 17, 2009, as discussed below under “Recent Developments,” an asset purchase agreement (the “Purchase Agreement”) was fully executed pursuant to which we agreed to sellsold substantially all of the assets, including the book of business, of the 16 remaining Retail Business locations that we ownowned in New York State (the “Assets”“New York Sale& #8221;). The closingEffective June 30, 2009, we sold all of the saleoutstanding stock of the Assets is subject to a number of conditions. We are also seeking to sell thesubsidiary that operated our three remaining Retail Business locations that we own in Pennsylvania.Pennsylvania (the “Pennsylvania Sale”).  As a result of the restructuring in December 2008, the New York Sale on April 17, 2009 and the Purchase Agreement on MarchPennsylvania Sale effective June 30, 2009, our Retail Business has been reclassified as discontinued operations and prior periods have been restated.
On February 1, 2008, we sold our outstanding premium finance loan portfolio. As a result of the sale, our business of internally financing insurance contracts has been reclassified as discontinued operations.
See “Business - Commercial Mutual Insurance Company” below for a discussion of the status of our efforts to acquire ownership of Commercial Mutual Insurance Company (“Commercial Mutual”), a New York property and casualty insurance company.
Recent Developments
The following developments have occurred since January 1, 2009:
·  On March 30, 2009, an asset purchase agreement (the “Purchase Agreement”) was fully executed pursuant to which our wholly-owned subsidiaries, Barry Scott Agency, Inc. and DCAP Accurate, Inc., agreed to sell substantially all of their assets, including the book of business, of the 16 Retail Business locations that we own in New York State (the “Assets”). The closing of the sale of the Assets is subject to a number of conditions. The purchase price for the Assets is approximately $2,337,000, of which approximately $1,786,000 is to be paid to us at closing, and the remainder of the purchase price is to be satisfied by the delivery of promissory notes in the aggregate principal amount of $551,000. As additional consideration, we will be entitled to receive through September 2010 an amount equal to 60% of the net commissions derived from the book of business of six New York retail locations that were closed during 2008.
2
Developments During 2008
·  On February 1, 2008, our wholly-owned subsidiary, Payments Inc., sold its outstanding premium finance loan portfolio. The purchase price for the net loan portfolio was approximately $11,845,000, of which approximately $268,000 was paid to Payments Inc.  The remainder of the purchase price was satisfied by the assumption of liabilities, including the satisfaction of Payments Inc.’s premium finance revolving credit line obligation to Manufacturers and Traders Trust Company (“M&T”). As additional consideration, Payments Inc. received an amount based upon the net earnings generated by the loan portfolio as it was collected. The purchaser of the portfolio also agreed that, during the five year period ending January 31, 2013 (subject to automatic renewal for successive two year terms under certain circumstances), it will purchase, assume and service all eligible premium finance contracts originated by Payments Inc. in the states of New York and Pennsylvania.  In connection with such purchases, Payments Inc. will be entitled to receive a fee generally equal to a percentage of the amount financed.
·  In April 2008, the holder of our Series B preferred shares exchanged such shares for an equal number of Series C preferred shares.  The Series C preferred shares provided for dividends at the rate of 10% per annum (as compared to 5% per annum for the Series B preferred shares) and an outside mandatory redemption date of April 30, 2009 (as compared to April 30, 2008 for the Series B preferred shares).  Effective August 23, 2008, the outside mandatory redemption date for the preferred shares was further extended to July 31, 2009 through the issuance of Series D preferred shares in exchange for the Series C preferred shares. The outside mandatory redemption date was previously extended in March 2007 from April 30, 2007 to April 30, 2008.  See Item 13 of this Annual Report.
·  In August 2008, the holders of $1,500,000 outstanding principal amount of notes payable (the “Notes Payable”) agreed to extend the maturity date of the debt from September 30, 2008 to the earlier of July 10, 2009 or 90 days following the conversion of Commercial Mutual to a stock property and casualty insurance company and the issuance to us of a controlling interest in Commercial Mutual (subject to acceleration under certain circumstances).  In exchange for this extension, the holders are entitled to receive an aggregate incentive payment equal to $10,000 times the number of months (or partial months) the debt is outstanding after September 30, 2008 through the maturity date. If a prepayment of principal reduces the debt below $1,500,000, the incentive payment for all subsequent months will be reduced in proportion to any such reduction to the debt. The aggregate incentive payment is due upon full repayment of the debt.  The maturity date of the Notes Payable was previously extended during 2007 from September 30, 2007 to September 30, 2008.  See Items 1(b), 7 and 13 of this Annual Report.
3
·  On October 23, 2008, Michael R. Feinsod became a member of the board of directors.
·  On December 5, 2008, Morton L. Certilman retired from the board of directors.
·  In December 2008, we entered into a plan to restructure our Retail Business. The plan of restructuring called for the closing of seven of our least profitable locations during December 2008 and the sale of the remaining 19 Retail Business locations.  See Item 1(b) of this Annual Report.
Developments During 2007
·  In March 2007, Commercial Mutual Insurance Company’s Board of Directors adopted a resolution to convert Commercial Mutual from an advance premium insurance company to a stock property and casualty insurance company.  We hold surplus notes of Commercial Mutual in the aggregate principal amount of $3,750,000.  We purchased such surplus notes in January 2006.  Based upon the amount payable on the surplus notes and the statutory surplus of Commercial Mutual, the plan of conversion provides that, in the event of a conversion by Commercial Mutual into a stock corporation, in exchange for our relinquishing our rights to any unpaid principal and interest under the surplus notes, we would receive 100% of the stock of Commercial Mutual.  See Items 1(b), 7 and 13 of this Annual Report.
 (b)
Business
General
Our storefront locations serve as insurance agents or brokers and place various types of insurance on behalf of customers.  We focus on automobile, motorcycle and homeowners insurance and our customer base is primarily individuals rather than businesses.
Currently there are 52 store locations owned or franchised by us of which 49 are located in New York State.  In the New York metropolitan area, there are 33 DCAP franchises.  There are also 12 Barry Scott locations and four Accurate Agency locations outside the New York metropolitan area (all located in central and western New York State). There are three Atlantic Insurance locations in eastern Pennsylvania.  All of the Barry Scott, Atlantic Insurance and Accurate Agency locations (the “Retail Business”) are wholly-owned by us. In December 2008, we made a decision to restructure our Retail Business. The plan of restructuring called for the closing of seven of our least profitable locations during December 2008 and sale of the remaining 19 Retail Business locations. As a result of the restructuring, our Retail Business has been reclassifiedpresented as discontinued operations and prior periods have been restated.  See Item 1(a) for a discussion“Recent Developments – Developments During 2009 – Sale of an agreement to sell our remainingBusinesses - New York State locationsLocations; and the contemplated sale of our- Pennsylvania locations.Locations.”
 
Through April 30, 2009, we received fees from 33 franchised locations in connection with their use of the DCAP name. Effective May 1, 2009, we sold all of the outstanding stock of the subsidiaries that operated our DCAP franchise business.  As a result of the sale, our franchise business has been presented as discontinued operations and prior periods have been restated.  See “Recent Developments - Developments During 2009 - Sale of Businesses - Franchise Business.”
4
ThroughPayments Inc., our wholly-owned subsidiary, Payments Inc., untilis an insurance premium finance agency that is licensed within the states of New York and Pennsylvania. Until February 1, 2008, we provided insurancePayments Inc. offered premium financing services to ourclients of DCAP, Barry Scott, Atlantic Insurance and Accurate Agency locationsoffices, as well as non-affiliated insurance agencies.  Payments Inc. is licensed as an insurance premium finance agency in the states of New York and Pennsylvania. EffectiveOn February 1, 2008, Payments Inc. sold its outstanding premium finance loan portfolio. As a result of the sale, our business of internally financing insurance contracts has been reclassifiedpresented as discontinued operations.  Payments Inc. now receivesEffective February 1, 2008, revenues through placement fees rather than through the internallyfrom our premium financing business have consisted of contracts.
Our continuing operations consist of franchising storefront insurance agencies under the DCAP brand name and earning placement fees based upon premium finance contracts purchased, assumed and serviced by the purchaser of ourthe loan portfolio on February 1,portfolio.  See “Recent Developments – Dev elopments During 2008.
 
We were incorporated in 1961 and assumed our current name in 1999.  In the event the Commercial Mutual conversion occurs, we will change our name to “Kingstone Companies, Inc.”  We obtained stockholder approval for such name change in November 2008.
2

Recent Developments
 
Our executive offices are located at 1158 Broadway, Hewlett, New York 11557; our telephone number is (516) 374-7600 and our fax number is (516) 295-7216.    Developments During 2009
Effective July 1, 2009, CMIC converted from an advance premium insurance companycooperative to a stock property and casualty insurance company. Based uponUpon the effectiveness of the conversion, CMIC’s name was changed to Kingstone Insurance Company (“KICO”). Pursuant to the plan of conversion, we acquired a 100% equity interest in KICO in consideration of the exchange of our $3,750,000 principal amount payableof surplus notes of CMIC.  In addition, we forgave all accrued and unpaid interest of $2,246,000 on the surplus notes as of the date of exchange. On July 1, 2009, we changed our name from DCAP Group, Inc. to Kingstone Companies, Inc.  See Item 13 of this Annual Report.
On April 17, 2009, we sold substantially all of the assets, including the book of business, of the 16 Retail Business locations that we owned in New York State (the “New York Assets”). The purchase price for the New York Assets was approximately $2,337,000, of which approximately $1,786,000 was paid at closing.  Promissory notes in the aggregate approximate original principal amount of $551,000 (the “New York Notes”) were also delivered at the closing. The New York Notes are payable in installments of approximately $73,000 on March 31, 2010 (which was paid), monthly installments of $50,000 each between April 30, 2010 and November 30, 2010 and a payment of approximately $105,000 on November 30, 2010, and provide for interest at the rate of 12.625% per annum. As additional consideration, we will be entitled to receive through September 30, 2010 an amount equal to 60% of the net commissions derived from the book of business of six retail locations that we closed in 2008.  See Item 7 of this Annual Report.
Effective June 30, 2009, we sold all of the outstanding stock of the subsidiary that operated our three remaining Pennsylvania stores (the “Pennsylvania Stock”).  The purchase price for the Pennsylvania Stock was approximately $397,000 which was paid by delivery of two promissory notes, one in the approximate principal amount of $238,000 and payable with interest at the rate of 9.375% per annum in 120 equal monthly installments, and the statutory surplus of Commercial Mutual, the plan of conversion provides that,other in the eventapproximate principal amount of a conversion by Commercial Mutual into a stock corporation,$159,000 and payable with interest at the rate of 6% per annum in exchange for our relinquishing our rights60 monthly installments commencing August 10, 2011 (with interest only being payable prior to any unpaid principal and interest under the surplus notes, we would receive 100%such date).  See Item 7 of the stock of Commercial Mutual.this Annual Report.
 
3

Effective May 1, 2009, we sold all of the outstanding stock of the subsidiaries that operated our DCAP franchise business.  The purchase price for the stock was $200,000 which was paid by delivery of a promissory note in such principal amount (the “Franchise Note”).  The Franchise Note is payable in installments of $50,000 on May 15, 2009 (which was paid), $50,000 on May 1, 2010 and $100,000 on May 1, 2011 and provides for interest at the rate of 5.25% per annum.  See Items 7 and 13 of this Annual Report.
On April 17, 2009, we paid the balance of the note payable incurred in connection with our purchase of the Accurate agency business.
In August 2008, the holders of $1,500,000 outstanding principal amount of notes payable (the “Notes Payable”) agreed to extend the maturity date of the debt from September 30, 2008 to the earlier of July 10, 2009 or 90 days following the conversion of CMIC to a stock property and casualty insurance company and the issuance to us of a controlling interest in CMIC (subject to acceleration under certain circumstances).  In exchange for this extension, the holders were entitled to receive an aggregate incentive payment equal to $10,000 times the number of months (or partial months) the debt was outstanding after September 30, 2008 through the maturity date. The agreement provided that, if a prepayment of principal reduced the debt below $1,500,000, the incentive payment for all subsequent months would be reduced in p roportion to any such reduction to the debt. The agreement also provided that the aggregate incentive payment was due upon full repayment of the debt.
On May 12, 2009, three of the holders exchanged an aggregate of $519,231 of Notes Payable principal for Series E preferred shares having an aggregate redemption amount equal to such aggregate principal amount of notes (see discussion below). Concurrently, we paid $49,543 to the three holders, which amount represents all accrued and unpaid interest and incentive payments through the date of exchange. In addition, on May 12, 2009, we prepaid $686,539 in principal of the Notes Payable to automobile insurance,the five remaining holders of the notes, together with $81,200, which amount represents accrued and unpaid interest and incentive payments on such prepayment.
On June 29, 2009, we prepaid the remaining $294,230 in principal of the Notes Payable, together with $19,400, which amount represents accrued and unpaid interest and incentive payments on such prepayment.
From June 2009 through December 2009, we borrowed an aggregate $1,050,000 and issued promissory notes in such aggregate principal amount (the “2009 Notes”).  The 2009 Notes provide for interest at the rate of 12.625% per annum and are payable on July 10, 2011. The 2009 Notes are prepayable by us without premium or penalty; provided, however, that, under any circumstances, the holders of the 2009 Notes are entitled to receive an aggregate of six months interest from the issue date of the 2009 Notes with respect to the amount prepaid. Between January 2010 and March 2010, we borrowed an additional $400,000 on the same terms as provided for in the 2009 Notes.  See Items 7 and 13 of this Annual Report.
4

Effective May 12, 2009, the holder of our Retail Business discontinued operations, we offer:Series D preferred shares exchanged such shares for an equal number of shares of Series E preferred shares which are mandatorily redeemable on July 31, 2011 (as compared to July 31, 2009 for the Series D preferred shares).  The Series E preferred shares provide for dividends at the rate of 11.5% per annum (as compared to 10% per annum for the Series D preferred shares) and a conversion price of $2.00 per share (as compared to $2.50 per share for the Series D preferred shares).  Further, the two series differ in that our obligation to redeem the Series E preferred shares is not accelerated based upon a sale of substantially all of our assets or certain of our subsidiaries (as compared to the Series D preferred shares which provided for such acceleration) and our obligation t o redeem the Series E preferred shares is not secured by the pledge of the outstanding stock of our subsidiary, AIA-DCAP Corp. (as compared to the Series D preferred shares which provided for such pledge).  See Items 7 and 13 of this Annual Report.
Developments During 2008
 
·  On February 1, 2008, our wholly-owned subsidiary, Payments Inc., sold its outstanding premium finance loan portfolio. The purchase price for the net loan portfolio was approximately $11,845,000, of which approximately $268,000 was paid to Payments Inc.  The remainder of the purchase price was satisfied by the assumption of liabilities, including the satisfaction of Payments Inc.’s premium finance revolving credit line obligation to Manufacturers and Traders Trust Company. As additional consideration, Payments Inc. received an amount based upon the net earnings generated by the loan portfolio as it was collected. The purchaser of the portfolio also agreed that, during the five year period ending January 31, 2013 (subje ct to automatic renewal for successive two year terms under certain circumstances), it will purchase, assume and service all eligible premium finance contracts originated by Payments Inc. in the states of New York and Pennsylvania.  In connection with such purchases, Payments Inc. will be entitled to receive a fee generally equal to a percentage of the amount financed.
·In April 2008, the holder of our Series B preferred shares exchanged such shares for an equal number of Series C preferred shares.  The Series C preferred shares provided for dividends at the rate of 10% per annum (as compared to 5% per annum for the Series B preferred shares) and an outside mandatory redemption date of April 30, 2009 (as compared to April 30, 2008 for the Series B preferred shares).  Effective August 23, 2008, the outside mandatory redemption date for the preferred shares was further extended to July 31, 2009 through the issuance of Series D preferred shares in exchange for the Series C preferred shares. The outside mandatory redemption date was previously extended in March 2007 from April 30, 20 07 to April 30, 2008.  See Item 13 of this Annual Report.
·On October 23, 2008, Michael R. Feinsod became a member of the board of directors.
·On December 5, 2008, Morton L. Certilman retired from the board of directors.
5

(b)Business
Property and Casualty Insurance
Overview
Generally, property and casualty insurance companies write insurance policies in exchange for motorcycles, boatspremiums paid by their customers (the “insured”).  An insurance policy is a contract between the insurance company and livery/taxis
·lifethe insured where the insurance
·business company agrees to pay for losses suffered by the insured that are covered under the contract.  Such contracts often are subject to subsequent legal interpretation by courts, legislative action and arbitration. Property insurance
·homeowner’s generally covers the financial consequences of accidental losses to the insured’s property, such as a home and the personal property in it, or a business’ building, inventory and equipment. Casualty insurance
·excess (often referred to as liability insurance) generally covers the financ ial consequences of a legal liability of an individual or an organization resulting from negligent acts and omissions causing bodily injury and/or property damage to a third party.  Claims on property coverage generally are reported and settled in a relatively short period of time, whereas those on casualty coverage can take years, even decades, to settle.
 
5
As a complement to our Retail Business discontinued operations, we offer automobile club services for roadside emergencies.  We offer memberships for such services,KICO derives substantially all of its revenues from earned premiums, ceding commissions from quota share reinsurance, investment income and we make arrangements with towing dispatch companies to fulfill service call requirements.net realized and unrealized gains and losses on investment securities.  Earned premiums represent premiums received from insureds, which are recognized as revenue over the period of time that insurance coverage is provided (i.e., ratably over the life of the policy). A significant period of time normally elapses between the receipt of insurance premiums and the payment of insurance claims. During this time, KICO invests the premiums, earns investment income and generates net realized and unrealized investment gains and losses on investments.
 
FranchisesInsurance companies incur a significant amount of their total expenses from policyholder losses, which are commonly referred to as claims. In settling policyholder losses, various loss adjustment expenses (“LAE”) are incurred such as insurance adjusters’ fees and litigation expenses. In addition, insurance companies incur policy acquisition expenses, such as commissions paid to producers and premium taxes, and other expenses related to the underwriting process, including their employees’ compensation and benefits.
 
Currently thereThe key measure of relative underwriting performance for an insurance company is the combined ratio. An insurance company’s combined ratio under accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (“GAAP”) is calculated by adding the ratio of incurred loss and LAE to earned premiums (the “loss and LAE ratio”) and the ratio of policy acquisition and other underwriting expenses to earned premiums (the “expense ratio”). A combined ratio under 100% indicates that an insurance company is generating an underwriting profit. However, when considering investment income and investment gains or losses, insurance companies operating at a combined ratio of greater than 100% can be profitable.
General
Effective July 1, 2009, with the acquisition of KICO, substantially all of our continuing operations consists of underwriting property and casualty insurance. KICO is a medium-sized multi-line regional property and casualty insurance company writing business exclusively through independent agents and brokers (“producers”).   We are 33 DCAP franchiseslicensed to write insurance in the state of New York. KICO provides direct markets to small to medium-sized producers located primarily in the New York metropolitan area.  Franchisees currently payCity area, also known as Downstate New York.
6

KICO’s competitive advantage in the marketplace is the service it provides to its producers, policyholders and claimants.  Our insurance producers value their relationship with us since they receive excellent, consistent personal service coupled with competitive rates and commission levels. We believe there are many producers looking for an initial franchise feeinsurer like KICO, which offers the producer a potential for growth and good service.  KICO consistently is rated above average in the important areas of $25,000underwriting, claims handling and service to offerproducers. We believe that the excellent service we provide to our producers, policyholders and claimants provides a foundation for growth.
We have developed online application raters and inquiry systems for our personal lines and commercial automobile products.  Substantially all of our personal lines are underwritten using this tool which has increased our productivity in customer service hours and data input as we have grown.  We plan to expand a similar online capability for our other lines of business.
Underwriting and Claims Management Philosophy
Our underwriting philosophy is to be conservative in the approach to risks that we write. We monitor results on a regular basis and all of our producers are reviewed by management on a quarterly basis.  In general, we try to avoid severity by writing at lower liability limits when possible.
We believe our rates are competitive with other carriers’ rates in our markets.  We believe that consistency and the reliable availability of our insurance products underis important to our producers.  We do not seek to grow by competing based solely upon price.  We seek to develop long term relationships with our select producers who understand and appreciate the DCAP name.  Franchisees are obligated to also pay us monthly fees duringconservative consistent path we have chosen.  We carefully underwrite all of our business utilizing the termCLUE database, motor vehicle reports, credit reports, physical inspection of risks and other underwriting software. In the franchise agreement, generally commencingevent that a material misrepresentation is discovered in the underwriting process, the policy is voided. If a material misrepresentation is discovered after a six to twelve month period fromclaim is presented, we deny the date on which the storefront opens for business.  Monthly fees payable by franchisees constituted approximately 45%claim. We write homeowners and dwelling fire business in New York City and Long Island and are cognizant of our revenues from continuing operations during the year ended December 31, 2008.exposure to hurricanes. We received no initial franchise feeshave mitigated this risk by adding mandatory hurricane deductibles to all policies. Our claim and underwriting expertise enables us to write personal lines business in 2008.all areas of New York City and Long Island at a profit.
 
A numberProduct Lines
Our product lines include the following:
Personal lines - Our principal line of our franchise locations provide income tax return preparation services.business is personal lines consisting of homeowners, dwelling fire, 3-4 family dwelling package, condominium, renters, mechanical breakdown and personal umbrella policies.
Commercial automobile – Our commercial automobile policies consist primarily of vehicles weighing less than 50,000 pounds owned by small contractors and artisans.
7

For-hire vehicle physical damage only policies - These policies are designed for newer vehicles utilized as black cars (limousines), yellow taxicabs and car service vehicles. No vehicle older than 4 years is written in the program.
Private passenger physical damage - We are currently writing policies for private passenger physical damage coverage under a unique product called Basic Auto. We also write a standard physical damage only product (PDO). These products are designed to be companion products with a New York Automobile Insurance Plan liability policy that is sold to insureds who are unable to obtain automobile insurance coverage in the voluntary market.
General liability policies - We commenced writing business owners policies (BOP) in 2009. The tax return preparation service allows themBOP business consists primarily of small business retail risks without a cooking or residential exposure. In June 2009, we commenced writing artisan’s liability policies.
Canine legal liability policies - We commenced writing this innovative program in September 2009. These policies cover bodily injury, property damage and medical payments for damages caused by the insured’s dog.
Distribution
We generate business through independent retail and wholesale agents and brokers whom we refer to offer an additional service to the walk-in customers who comprise the bulk of their customer base,collectively as producers. These producers sell policies for KICO as well as to existing customers.
Structurefor other insurance companies. We carefully select our producers by evaluating several factors such as their need for our products, premium production potential, loss history with other insurance companies that they represent, product and Operations
As stated above, we currently have 52 offices, of which 33 are franchisesmarket knowledge, and 19 are wholly-owned.  Our franchises consist of both “conversion” and “startup” operations.  In a conversion operation, an existing insurance brokerage with an established business becomes a DCAP office.  In a startup operation, an entrepreneur begins operations as a DCAP office.  Each franchise is managed by, and is under the supervisionsize of the franchisee.
In order to promote consistency and efficiency, and as a service to our franchisees, we offer training to office managers.  Our training program covers:
·  marketing, sales and underwriting
·  office and logistics
·  computer information
agency.
 
We also provide support services to stores such as:manage the results of our producers through periodic reviews of volume and profitability. We continuously monitor the performance of our producers by assessing leading indicators and metrics that signal the need for corrective action. Corrective action may include increased frequency of producer meetings and more detailed business planning.
 
·  assistance with regard to the hiring of employees
All producers are assigned an underwriter and the producer can call that underwriter directly on any matter. We believe that the close relationship with their underwriter is the principal reason producers place their business with us.  Requests for quotes are responded to promptly. Our online application raters and inquiry systems which have streamlined the process of placing business with us.  Our producers have access to a website which contains all of our applications, rating software, policy forms and underwriting guidelines for all lines of business.  We send out our publication “KICO Producer News” in order to inform our producers of updates at KICO. In addition we have an active Producer Council and will have at least one annual meeting with all of our producers.
·  assistance with regard to the writing of local advertising
·  advice regarding potential carriers for certain customers
Competition
The insurance industry is highly competitive. Each year we attempt to assess and project the market conditions when we develop prices for our products, but we cannot fully know our profitability until all claims have been reported and settled.
 
We also managecompete with both large national and regional carriers in the cooperative advertising program in which allproperty and casualty insurance marketplace.  Inside our selected producers’ offices, we compete with the other carriers available to that producer.  Most of our franchisees participate.competition is from carriers with far greater capital and brand recognition.  We feel we can compete with any carrier based on service, stressing the development of our personal underwriting relationships for the producer, and the fair and expedient handling of claims to the insured.
8

Increased competition could result in fewer applications for coverage, lower premium rates and less favorable policy terms, which could adversely affect us. We are unable to predict the extent to which new, proposed or potential initiatives may affect the demand for our products or the risks that may be available for us to consider underwriting.
 
In addition to the above services, we provide to all of our franchisees a direct business relationship with nationally-knownLoss and local insurance carriers that may otherwise be beyond the reach of small, privately-owned retail insurance operations.Loss Adjustment Expense Reserves
 
We are required to establish reserves for incurred losses that are unpaid, including reserves for claims and loss adjustment expenses (“LAE”), which represent the expenses of settling and adjusting those claims. These reserves are balance sheet liabilities representing estimates of future amounts required to pay losses and loss expenses for claims that have occurred at or before the balance sheet date, whether already known to us or not yet reported. Our policy is to establish these losses and loss reserves after considering all information known to us as of the date they are recorded.
Loss reserves fall into two categories: case reserves for reported losses and loss expenses associated with a specific reported insured claim, and reserves for incurred but not reported (“IBNR”) losses and LAE. We establish these two categories of loss reserves as follows:
Reserves for reported losses - When a claim is received, we establish a case reserve for the estimated amount of its ultimate settlement and its estimated loss expenses. We establish case reserves based upon the known facts about each claim at the time the claim is reported and may subsequently increase or reduce the case reserves as our claims department deems necessary based upon the development of additional facts about claims.
IBNR reserves - We also offerestimate and establish reserves for loss and LAE amounts incurred but not yet reported, including expected development of reported claims. IBNR reserves are calculated as ultimate losses and LAE less reported losses and LAE. Ultimate losses are projected by using generally accepted actuarial techniques.
The liability for loss and LAE represents our franchiseesbest estimate of the useultimate cost of all reported and unreported losses that are unpaid as of the balance sheet date. The liability for loss and LAE is estimated on an agency software system, AMS 360,undiscounted basis, using individual case-basis valuations, statistical analyses and various actuarial procedures. The projection of future claim payment and reporting is based on an analysis of our historical experience, supplemented by analyses of industry loss data. We believe that the reserves for loss and LAE are adequate to cover the ultimate cost of losses and claims to date; however, because of the uncertainty from various sources, including changes in reporting patterns, claims settlement patterns, judicial decisions, legislation, and economic conditions, actual loss experience may not conform to the assumptions us ed in determining the estimated amounts for such liability at the balance sheet date. As adjustments to these estimates become necessary, such adjustments are reflected in expense for the period in which the estimates are changed. Because of the nature of the business historically written, we believe that we have limited exposure to environmental claim liabilities. We recognize recoveries from salvage and subrogation when received.
9

Reconciliation of Loss and Loss Adjustment Expenses
The table below shows the reconciliation of loss and LAE on a gross and net basis for the period from July 1, 2009 (date of acquisition of KICO) through December 31, 2009, reflecting changes in losses incurred and paid losses:
 Balance at July 1, 2009 $16,431,191 
 Less reinsurance recoverables  (9,730,288)
    6,700,903 
     
 Incurred related to:    
 Current year  1,864,515 
 Prior years  170,956 
 Total incurred  2,035,471 
     
 Paid related to:    
 Current year  975,376 
 Prior years  1,759,983 
 Total paid  2,735,359 
      
 Net balance at end of period  6,001,015 
 Add reinsurance recoverables  10,512,303 
 Balance at December 31, 2009 $16,513,318 
Our claims reserving practices are designed to set reserves that in the aggregate are adequate to pay all claims at their ultimate settlement value.
Loss and Loss Adjustment Expenses Development

As of December 31, 2009 and based upon information updated from the prior year, we re-estimated that the reserves which were established as of December 31, 2008 were $13,000 redundant. A redundancy means that the original reserves were higher than the current estimate.

We do not have accurate and reliable data to prepare the required loss and loss adjustment expense reserve development table for the required ten year period. We and our independent actuary will endeavor to reconstruct our data into a framework that will allow us to prepare the required ten year presentation in connection with the preparation of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ending December 31, 2010.
Reinsurance
We purchase reinsurance to reduce our net liability on individual risks, to protect against possible catastrophes, to achieve a target ratio of net premiums written to policyholders’ surplus and to expand our underwriting capacity. Our reinsurance program was structured while we were an advance premium cooperative and reflected our management’s obligations and goals while a policyholder owned company. Reinsurance via quota share allows for a carrier to write business without increasing its leverage above a management determined ratio. The additional business written allows a reinsurer to assume the risks involved, but gives the reinsurer the profit (or loss) associated with such.  Since the conversion to a stock company, we determined it to be in the best interests of our shareholders to prudently reduce our reliance on quota share reinsurance.  This will result in higher earned premiums and operationsa reduction in ceding commission revenue in future years. Our participation in reinsurance arrangements does not relieve us from our obligations to policyholders.
10

Investments
Our investment portfolio, excluding other investments, as of their retailDecember 31, 2009, is summarized in the table below by type of investment.
  Carrying  % of 
 Category
 Value  Portfolio 
       
 Cash and cash equivalents $625,320   4.0%
         
 Short term investments  225,336   1.4%
         
 U.S. Treasury securities and        
 obligations of U.S. government        
 corporations and agencies  3,564,477   22.5%
         
 Political subdivisions of states,        
 territories and possessions  5,822,103   36.8%
         
 Corporate and other bonds        
 Industrial and miscellaneous  3,404,500   21.5%
         
 Preferred stocks  745,000   4.7%
         
 Common stocks  1,441,926   9.1%
 Total $15,828,662   100.0%
The table below summarizes the credit quality of our fixed-maturity securities as of December 31, 2009 as rated by Standard and Poor’s.

   Percentage of 
 Carrying Carrying 
 Value Value 
Rating    
U.S. Treasury securities $3,564,477   27.9%
AAA  3,404,461   26.6%
AA  2,564,302   20.0%
A  2,808,145   22.0%
BBB  449,695   3.5%
Total $12,791,080   100.0%
Additional financial information regarding our investments is presented under the subheading “Investment Portfolio” in Item 7 of this Annual Report.
Ratings
Many insurance stores.buyers, agents and brokers use the ratings assigned by A.M. Best and other agencies to assist them in assessing the financial strength and overall quality of the companies from which they are considering purchasing insurance.  Since KICO became a stock property and casualty insurance company effective July 1, 2009, it has been seeking an A.M. Best rating. A. M. Best ratings are derived from an in-depth evaluation of an insurance company’s balance sheet strengths, operating performances and business profiles. A.M. Best evaluates, among other factors, the company’s capitalization, underwriting leverage, financial leverage, asset leverage, capital structure, quality and appropriateness of reinsurance, adequacy of reserves, quality and diversification of assets, liquidity, profitability, spread of risk , revenue composition, market position, management, market risk and event risk. A.M. Best ratings are intended to provide an independent opinion of an insurer’s ability to meet its obligations to policyholders and are not an evaluation directed at investors. An A.M. Best rating will allow us to expand our writings by adding producers not now available to us.  We currently have a Demotech rating of A (Excellent) which qualifies our policies for banks and finance companies.
 
11
6

Internet
Our website (www.dcapagents.com) is a secure site for use by personnel of our company-owned stores as well as our franchisees.  Incorporated within the website are tools for managing the location’s business, including comparative quoting, lead generation and tracking. 
Policy placement generates commission revenue.  Since policy sales can be measured as they relate to the number of inquiries or leads, increased marketing will result in more leads.  Our website, www.dcapinsurance.com, offers the prospective insured the opportunity to provide our company-owned stores as well as our franchisees the needed information in the very same manner as provided face to face or over the telephone.  With the information provided, we and our franchisees can give multiple quotes to the prospect as well as track the status of the lead from the moment it is received.   
Premium Financing
 
Customers who purchase insurance policies are often unable to pay the premium in a lump sum and, therefore, require extended payment terms.  Premium finance involves making a loan to the customer that is secured by the unearned portion of the insurance premiums being financed and held by the insurance carrier.  Our wholly-owned subsidiary, Payments Inc., is licensed as a premium finance agency in the states of New York and Pennsylvania.
 
Prior to February 1, 2008, Payments Inc. provided premium financing in connection with the obtaining of insurance policies.  Effective February 1, 2008, Payments Inc. sold its outstanding premium finance loan portfolio.  The purchaser of the portfolio has agreed that, during the five year period following the closing (subject to automatic renewal for successive two year terms under certain circumstances), it will purchase, assume and service all eligible premium finance contracts originated by Payments in the states of New York and Pennsylvania.  In connection with such purchases, Payments will be entitled to receive a fee generally equal to a percentage of the amount financed. Our premium financing business currently consists of the placement fees that Payments will earn from placing contracts. Placement fees earned from placing contracts constituted approximately 47%5.2% and 99.4% of our revenues from continuing operations during the yearyears ended December 31, 2008.2009 and 2008, respectively.
 
The regulatory framework under which our premium finance procedures are established is generally set forth in the premium finance statutes of the states in which we operate.  Among other restrictions, the interest rate that may be charged to the insuredsinsured for financing their premiums is limited by these state statutes.  See “Government Regulation.”
 
Commercial Mutual Insurance
Government Regulation
Holding Company Regulation
 
In March 2007, Commercial Mutual Insurance Company’s BoardWe, as the parent of Directors approved a resolutionKICO, are subject to convert Commercial Mutual fromthe insurance holding company laws of the state of New York. These laws generally require an advance premium insurance company to a stock property and casualty insurance company pursuant to Section 7307 ofregister with the New York State Insurance Law. Commercial Mutual has advised us that it has obtained permission fromDepartment (the “Insurance Department”) and to furnish annually financial and other information about the Superintendentoperations of companies within our holding company system. Generally under these laws, all material transactions among companies in the holding company system to which KICO is a party must be fair and reasonable and, if material or of a specified category, require prior notice and approval or non-disapproval by the Insurance of the State of New York (the “Superintendent of Insurance”) to proceed with the conversion process (subject to certain conditions as discussed below).Department.
 
12
7

We hold two surplus notes issued
In addition, in connection with the plan of conversion of CMIC, we have agreed with the Insurance Department that, until July 1, 2011, no dividend may be paid by Commercial Mutual in the aggregate principal amount of $3,750,000.  Previously earned but unpaid interest on the notes as of December 31, 2008 was approximately $2,186,000.  The surplus notes are past due and provide for interest at the prime rate or 8.5% per annum, whichever is less.  Payments of principal and interest on the surplus notes may only be made out of the surplus of Commercial Mutual and requireKICO to us without the approval of the Insurance DepartmentDepartment.
Change of Control
The insurance holding company laws of the Statestate of New York require approval by the Insurance Department of any change of control of an insurer. “Control” is generally defined as the possession, direct or indirect, of the power to direct or cause the direction of the management and policies of the company, whether through the ownership of voting securities, by contract or otherwise. Control is generally presumed to exist through the direct or indirect ownership of 10% or more of the voting securities of a domestic insurance company or any entity that controls a domestic insurance company.  Any future transactions that would constitute a change of control of KICO, including a change of control of Kingstone Companies, Inc., would generally require the party acquiring control to obtain the approval of the New York I nsurance Department (and in any other state in which KICO may operate).  Obtaining these approvals may result in the material delay of, or deter, any such transaction.  These laws may discourage potential acquisition proposals and may delay, deter or prevent a change of control of Kingstone Companies, Inc., including through transactions, and in particular unsolicited transactions, that some or all of our stockholders might consider to be desirable.
State Insurance Regulation
Insurance companies are subject to regulation and supervision by the department of insurance in the state in which they are domiciled and, to a lesser extent, other states in which they conduct business. The primary purpose of such regulatory powers is to protect individual policyholders. State insurance authorities have broad regulatory, supervisory and administrative powers, including, among other things, the power to grant and revoke licenses to transact business, set the standards of solvency to be met and maintained, determine the nature of, and limitations on, investments and dividends, approve policy forms and rates in some instances and regulate unfair trade and claims practices.
KICO is required to file detailed financial statements and other reports with the Insurance Department in New York, the state in which KICO is licensed to transact business. These financial statements are subject to periodic examination by the Insurance Department.
In addition, many states have laws and regulations that limit an insurer’s ability to withdraw from a particular market. For example, states may limit an insurer’s ability to cancel or not renew policies. Furthermore, certain states prohibit an insurer from withdrawing from one or more lines of business written in the state, except pursuant to a plan that is approved by the state insurance department. The state insurance department may disapprove a plan that may lead to market disruption. Laws and regulations, including those in New York, that limit cancellation and non-renewal and that subject program withdrawals to prior approval requirements may restrict the ability of KICO to exit unprofitable markets.
Federal and State Legislative and Regulatory Changes
From time to time, various regulatory and legislative changes have been proposed in the insurance industry. Among the proposals that have in the past been or are at present being considered are the possible introduction of Federal regulation in addition to, or in lieu of, the current system of state regulation of insurers, and proposals in various state legislatures (some of which proposals have been enacted) to conform portions of their insurance laws and regulations to various model acts adopted by the National Association of Insurance Commissioners (the “Insurance Department”“NAIC”). We are unable to predict whether any of these laws and regulations will be adopted, the form in which any such laws and regulations would be adopted, or the effect, if any, these developments would have on our operations and financial condition.
13

State Insurance Department Examinations
As part of their regulatory oversight process, state insurance departments conduct periodic detailed examinations of the financial reporting of insurance companies domiciled in their states, generally once every three to five years. Examinations are generally carried out in cooperation with the insurance departments of other states under guidelines promulgated by the NAIC. An examination of the financial condition of KICO was made by the New York Insurance Department prior to its acquisition by us.
Risk-Based Capital Regulations
State insurance departments impose risk-based capital (“RBC”) requirements on insurance enterprises. The RBC Model serves as a benchmark for the regulation of insurance companies by state insurance regulators.  RBC provides for targeted surplus levels based on formulas, which specify various weighting factors that are applied to financial balances or various levels of activity based on the perceived degree of risk, and are set forth in the RBC requirements. Such formulas focus on four general types of risk: (a) the risk with respect to the company’s assets (asset or default risk); (b) the risk of default on amounts due from reinsurers, policyholders, or other creditors (credit risk); (c) the risk of underestimating liabilities from business already written or inadequately pricing business to be written in the coming year (underwriting risk); and (d) the risk associated with items such as excessive premium growth, contingent liabilities, and other items not reflected on the balance sheet (off-balance sheet risk). The amount determined under such formulas is called the authorized control level RBC (“ACLC”).
The RBC guidelines define specific capital levels based on a company’s ACLC that are determined by the ratio of the company’s total adjusted capital (“TAC”) to its ACLC. TAC is equal to statutory capital, plus or minus certain other specified adjustments. KICO was in compliance with New York’s RBC requirements as of December 31, 2009.
Insurance Regulatory Information System Ratios
The Insurance Regulatory Information System, or IRIS, was developed by the NAIC and is intended primarily to assist state insurance departments in executing their statutory mandates to oversee the financial condition of insurance companies operating in their respective states. IRIS identifies thirteen industry ratios and specifies “usual values” for each ratio. Departure from the usual values on four or more of the ratios can lead to inquiries from individual state insurance commissioners as to certain aspects of an insurer’s business.
As of December 31, 2008,2009, KICO had two ratios outside the statutory surplus of Commercial Mutual, as reportedusual range due to the Insurance Department, was approximately $7,748,000.
The conversion by Commercial Mutual to a stock propertyreliance on quota share reinsurance and casualty insurance company is subject to a number of conditions, including the approval of the plan of conversion, which was filed with the Superintendent of Insurance on April 25, 2008, by both the Superintendent of Insurance and Commercial Mutual’s policyholders. As part of the approval process, the Superintendent of Insurance conducted a five year examination of Commercial Mutual as of December 31, 2006 and had an appraisal performed with respect to the fair market value of Commercial Mutual as of such date. We, as the holder of the Commercial Mutual surplus notes, at our option, would be able to exchange the surplus notes for an equitable share of the securities or other consideration, or both, of the corporation into which Commercial Mutual would be converted.  Based upon the amount payable on the surplus notes and the statutory surplus of Commercial Mutual, the plan of conversion provides that, in the event of a conversion by Commercial Mutual into a stock corporation, in exchange for our relinquishing our rights to any unpaid principal and interest under the surplus notes, we would receive 100% of the stock of Commercial Mutual.  Upon the effectiveness of the conversion, Commercial Mutual’s name will change to “Kingstone Insurance Company.”  We have obtained stockholder approval of an amendment to our certificate of incorporation to change our name to “Kingstone Companies, Inc.”  Such name change would only take place in the event that the conversion occurs and we obtain a controlling interest in Kingstone Insurance Company.  No assurances can be given that the conversion will occur or as to the timing or the terms of the conversion.
Competition
We and our franchisees compete with numerous insurance agents and brokers in our market.  The amount of capital required to commence operations is generally small and the only material barrier to entry is the ability to obtain the required licenses and appointments as a broker or agent for insurance carriers.  There is no price competition between us or our franchisees and other agents and brokers.  All must sell a particular carrier’s policies at exactly the same price; however, we and our franchisees may be able to offer a different payment plan through the placement of premium financing.
In recent years, extensive competition has come from direct sales entities, such as Progressive Direct, Esurance and GEICO Insurance, who have concentrated their advertising efforts on television and radio.  In addition, the Internet sales effort of some competitors has shown promise.  Further, legislation that allows banks to offer insurance to their customers has taken market share from the storefront insurance operators.higher than industry average investment expenses.
 
14
8

Government RegulationAccounting Principles
Statutory accounting principles, or SAP, are a basis of accounting developed to assist insurance regulators in monitoring and regulating the solvency of insurance companies. SAP is primarily concerned with measuring an insurer’s surplus to policyholders. Accordingly, statutory accounting focuses on valuing assets and liabilities of insurers at financial reporting dates in accordance with appropriate insurance law and regulatory provisions applicable in each insurer’s domiciliary state.
Generally accepted accounting principles, or GAAP is concerned with a company’s solvency, but is also concerned with other financial measurements, principally income and cash flows. Accordingly, GAAP gives more consideration to appropriate matching of revenue and expenses and accounting for management’s stewardship of assets than does SAP. As a direct result, different assets and liabilities and different amounts of assets and liabilities will be reflected in financial statements prepared in accordance with GAAP as compared to SAP.
Statutory accounting practices established by the NAIC and adopted in part by the New York insurance regulators, determine, among other things, the amount of statutory surplus and statutory net income of KICO and thus determine, in part, the amount of funds that are available to pay dividends to Kingstone Companies, Inc.
Premium Financing
 
Our premium finance subsidiary, Payments Inc., is regulated by governmental agencies in the states in which it conducts business.  The regulations, which generally are designed to protect the interests of policyholders who elect to finance their insurance premiums, vary by jurisdiction, but usually, among other matters, involve:
 
·  regulating the interest rates, fees and service charges wethat may charge our customersbe charged;
 
·  imposing minimum capital requirements for our premium finance subsidiary or requiring surety bonds in addition to or as an alternative to such capital requirementsrequirements;
 
·  governing the form and content of our financing agreementsagreements;
 
·  prescribing minimum notice and cure periods before we may cancel a customer’s policy for non-payment under the terms of the financing agreementagreement;
 
·  prescribing timing and notice procedures for collecting unearned premium from the insurance company, applying the unearned premium to our customer’s premium finance account, and, if applicable, returning any refund due to our customercustomer;
 
·  requiring our premium finance company to qualify for and obtain a license and to renew the license each yearyear;
 
·  conducting periodic financial and market conduct examinations and investigations of our premium finance company and its operationsoperations;
15

 
·  requiring prior notice to the regulating agency of any change of control of our premium finance companycompany.
 
The offering of franchisesLegal Structure
We were incorporated in 1961 and assumed the name DCAP Group, Inc. in 1999. On July 1, 2009, we changed our name to Kingstone Companies, Inc.
Offices
Our principal executive offices are located at 1154 Broadway, Hewlett, New York 11557, and our telephone number at that location is regulated by both the federal government(516) 374-7600. Our website is www.kingstonecompanies.com. Our internet website and the State of New York, in which our franchisees operate.information contained therein or connected thereto are not intended to be incorporated by reference into this Annual Report.
 
Employees
 
We currently employ five persons
As of December 31, 2009, we had 40 employees all of whom are located in New York. None of our continuing operations and 46 persons in our discontinued operations.employees is covered by a collective bargaining agreement. We believe that our relationship with our employees is good.

ITEM 1A.                      RISK FACTORS.
 
Not applicable.  See, however, “Factors That May Affect Future Results and Financial Condition” in Item 7 of this Annual Report.
 
ITEM 1B.                      UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS.
 
Not applicable.
 
9
ITEM 2.                      PROPERTIES.
 
Our principal executive offices and the administrative offices of Payments Inc. are located at 11581154 Broadway, Hewlett, New York.  Our central processing offices areinsurance underwriting business is located at 1762 Central Avenue, Albany,15 Joys Lane, Kingston, New York.
 
Our 12 Barry Scott offices and four Accurate Agency offices are located in upstate New York.  Our three Atlantic Insurance offices are located in eastern Pennsylvania.
Our 19 wholly-owned storefront locations and our executive and other offices are operated pursuant to lease agreements that expire from time to time through 2015.  The current yearly aggregate base rental for theour executive offices is approximately $414,000.
See Item 1$35,000.  We own the building from which our insurance underwriting business operates, free of this Annual Report for a discussion of a contemplated sale of our Barry Scott and Accurate Agency operations.mortgage.
 
ITEM 3.                      LEGAL PROCEEDINGS.
 
None.
 
ITEM 4.                      SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERSRESERVED.
 
Our Annual Meeting of Stockholders was held on November 26, 2008.  The following is a listing of the votes cast for or withheld with respect to each nominee for director and a listing of the votes cast for and against, as well as abstentions and broker non-votes, with respect to the approval of an amendment to our Certificate of Incorporation to:

1.           Election of Board of Directors

 Number of Shares
 For
 Withheld
   
Barry B. Goldstein2,519,847160,443
Morton L. Certilman1,097,249939,126
Michael R. Feinsod2,520,079160,221
Jay M. Haft1,351,726939,126
David A. Lyons2,520,039160,251
Jack D. Seibald2,520,089160,211

2.           Approval of amendment to Certificate of Incorporation to change our name to “Kingstone Companies, Inc.”
For2,074,823
Against6,137
Abstentions167,470
Broker Non-Votes0


16
 
10

 

PART II
 
ITEM 5.
MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES.
 
Market Information
 
Our common shares are quoted on The NASDAQ Capital Market under the symbol “DCAP.“KINS.
 
Set forth below are the high and low sales prices for our common shares for the periods indicated, as reported on The NASDAQ Capital Market.
 
HighLow
2009 Calendar Year  
First Quarter$  .85$  .04
Second Quarter  2.41    .39
Third Quarter  2.50 1.90
Fourth Quarter  2.50 1.70
  
HighLowHighLow
2008 Calendar Year    
First Quarter$1.75$1.21$1.75$1.21
Second Quarter 1.67   .95  1.67   .95
Third Quarter 1.20   .80  1.20   .80
Fourth Quarter  .80   .25   .80   .25
  
HighLow
2007 Calendar Year  
First Quarter$3.05$2.33
Second Quarter 2.70  2.18
Third Quarter 2.75  1.95
Fourth Quarter 2.39  1.15

Holders
 
As of April 6, 2009,March 26, 2010, there were approximately 852777 record holders of our common shares.
 
Dividends
 
Holders of our common shares are entitled to dividends when, as and if declared by our Board of Directors out of funds legally available.  There are also currently outstanding 7801,299 Series DE preferred shares.  These shares are entitled to cumulative aggregate dividends of $78,000$149,412 per annum (10%(11.5% of their liquidation preference of $780,000)$1,299,231).  The Series DE preferred shares are mandatorily redeemable on July 31, 2009.2011.  No dividends may be paid on our common shares unless a payment is made to the holders of the Series DE preferred shares of all dividends accumulated or accrued at such time.
 
We have not declared or paid any dividends in the past to the holders of our common shares and do not currently anticipate declaring or paying any dividends in the foreseeable future.  We intend to retain earnings, if any, to finance the development and expansion of our business.  Future dividend policy will be subject to the discretion of our Board of Directors and will be contingent upon future earnings, if any, our financial condition, capital requirements, general business conditions, and other factors.  Therefore, we can give no assurance that any dividends of any kind will ever be paid to holders of our common shares.
 
17
11

Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities
 
None.
 
Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
 
None.
 
ITEM 6.                  SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA.
 
Not applicable.
 
ITEM 7.
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS.
 
Overview
 
On July 1, 2009, we completed the acquisition of 100% of the issued and outstanding common stock of Kingstone Insurance Company (“KICO”) (formerly known as Commercial Mutual Insurance Company (“CMIC”)) pursuant to the conversion of CMIC from an advance premium cooperative to a stock property and casualty insurance company (see Note 3 to the Consolidated Financial Statements - “Acquisition of Kingstone Insurance Company”). Pursuant to the plan of conversion, we acquired a 100% equity interest in KICO, in consideration for the exchange of $3,750,000 principal amount of surplus notes of CMIC. In addition, we forgave all accrued and unpaid interest of approximately $2,246,000 on the surplus notes as of the date of conversion. 
Effective July 1, 2009, we now offer property and casualty insurance products to small businesses and individuals in New York State through our subsidiary, KICO. The effect of the KICO acquisition is only included in our results of operations and cash flows for the period from July 1, 2009 through December 31, 2009. Accordingly, discussions pertaining to KICO will only include the six months ended December 31, 2009.
Until December 2008, our continuing operations primarily consisted of the ownership and operation of 19 insurance brokerage and agency storefronts, including 12 Barry Scott locations in New York State, three Atlantic Insurance locations in Pennsylvania, and four Accurate Agency locations.locations in New York State. In December 2008, due to declining revenues and profits, we made a decision to restructure our network of retail offices (the “Retail Business”). The plan of restructuring called for the closing of seven of our least profitable locations during December 2008 and the sale of the remaining 19 Retail Business locations.  On March 30,April 17, 2009, an asset purchase agreement (the “Purchase Agreement”) was fully executed pursuant to which we agreed to sellsold substantially all of the assets, including the book of business, of the 16 remaining Retail Business locations that we ownowned in New York State (the “Assets”“New York Sale& #8221;). The closingEffective June 30, 2009, we sold all of the saleoutstanding stock of the Assets is subject to a number of conditions.subsidiary that operated our three remaining Retail Business locations in Pennsylvania (the “Pennsylvania Sale”).  As a result of the restructuring in December 2008, the New York Sale on April 17, 2009 and the Purchase Agreement on MarchPennsylvania Sale effective June 30, 2009, our Retail Business has been reclassifiedpresented as discontinued operations and prior periods have been restated.
 
In our continuing operations,Through April 30, 2009, we receivereceived fees from 33 franchised locations in connection with their use of the DCAP name. Effective May 1, 2009, we sold all of the outstanding stock of the subsidiaries that operated our DCAP franchise business.  As a result of the sale, our franchise business has been presented as discontinued operations and prior periods have been restated.
 
18

Payments Inc., our wholly-owned subsidiary, is an insurance premium finance agency that is licensed within the states of New York and Pennsylvania. Until February 1, 2008, Payments Inc. offered premium financing to clients of DCAP, Barry Scott, Atlantic Insurance and Accurate Agency offices, as well as non-affiliated insurance agencies.  On February 1, 2008, Payments Inc. sold its outstanding premium finance loan portfolio. As a result of the sale, our business of internally financing insurance contracts has been reclassifiedpresented as discontinued operations.  Effective February 1, 2008, revenues from our premium financing business have consisted of placement fees based upon premium finance contracts purchased, assumed and serviced by the purchaser of the loan portfolio.
 
In our Retail Business discontinued operations, the insurance storefronts serveserved as insurance agents or brokers and placeplaced various types of insurance on behalf of customers.  Our Retail Business focusesfocused on automobile, motorcycle and homeowner’s insurance and our customer base iswas primarily individuals rather than businesses.
 
12
The stores also offeroffered automobile club services for roadside assistance and some of our franchise locations offeroffered income tax preparation services.
 
The stores from our Retail Business discontinued operations receivereceived commissions from insurance companies for their services.  NeitherPrior to July 1, 2009, neither we nor the stores have served as an insurance company and therefore we havedid not assumedassume underwriting risks; however, as discussed above, effective July 1, 2009, we acquired a 100% equity interest in Item 1(b)KICO.
Principal Revenue and Expense Items
Net premiums earned.  Net premiums earned is the earned portion of this Annual Report, in March 2007, Commercial Mutual Insurance Company’s Boardour written premiums, less that portion of Directors adoptedpremium that is ceded to third party reinsurers under reinsurance agreements. The amount ceded under these reinsurance agreements is based on a resolution to convert Commercial Mutual from an advance premium insurance company to a stock property and casualty insurance company.  We hold surplus notes of Commercial Mutualcontractual formula contained in the aggregate principal amountindividual reinsurance agreement. Insurance premiums are earned on a pro rata basis over the term of $3,750,000.  Based uponthe policy. At the end of each reporting period, premiums written that are not earned are classified as unearned premiums and are earned in subsequent periods over the remaining term of the policy. Our insurance policies typically have a term of one year. Accordingly, for a one-year policy written on July 1, 2 009, we would earn half of the premiums in 2009 and the other half in 2010.
Ceding commission revenue.  Commissions on reinsurance premiums ceded are earned in a manner consistent with the recognition of the direct acquisition costs of the underlying insurance policies, generally on a pro-rata basis over the terms of the policies reinsured.
Net investment income and net realized gains on investments.  We invest our statutory surplus funds and the funds supporting our insurance liabilities primarily in cash and cash equivalents, short term investments, fixed maturity and equity securities. Our net investment income includes interest and dividends earned on our invested assets, less investment expenses. Net realized gains and losses on our investments are reported separately from our net investment income. Net realized gains occur when our investment securities are sold for more than their costs or amortized costs, as applicable. Net realized losses occur when our investment securities are sold for less than their costs or amortized costs, as applicable, or are written down as a result of other-than-temporary impairment. We classify equity securities and our fixed maturity securities as available-for-sale. Net unrealized gains (losses) on those securities classified as available-for-sale are reported separately within accumulated other comprehensive income on our balance sheet.
19

Other income.  We recognize installment fee income and fees charged to reinstate a policy after it has been cancelled for non-payment. We also recognize premium finance fee income on loans financed by a third party finance company.
Loss and loss adjustment expenses incurred.  Loss and loss adjustment expenses (“LAE”) incurred represent our largest expense item and, for any given reporting period, include estimates of future claim payments, changes in those estimates from prior reporting periods and costs associated with investigating, defending and servicing claims. These expenses fluctuate based on the amount payableand types of risks we insure. We record loss and LAE related to estimates of future claim payments based on case-by-case valuations and statistical analyses. We seek to establish all reserves at the most likely ultimate exposure based on our historical claims experience. It is typical for certain claims to take several years to settle and we revise our estimates as we receive additional information from the claimants. Our ability to estimate loss and LAE accurately at the time of pricing our insurance policies is a critical factor in our profitability.
Commission expenses and other underwriting expenses.  Other underwriting expenses include acquisition costs and other underwriting expenses. Acquisition costs represent the costs of writing business that vary with, and are primarily related to, the production of insurance business (principally commissions, premium taxes and certain underwriting salaries). Policy acquisition costs are deferred and recognized as expense as the related premiums are earned. Other underwriting expenses represent general and administrative expenses. General and administrative expenses are comprised of other costs associated with our insurance activities such as regulatory fees, telecommunication and technology costs, occupancy costs, employment costs, and legal and auditin g fees.
Other operating expenses.  Other operating expenses include the corporate expenses of our holding company, Kingstone Companies, Inc. These expenses include executive employment costs, legal, auditing and consulting fees, occupancy costs related to our corporate office and other costs directly associated with being a public company.
Acquisition transaction costs. Acquisition transaction costs are the costs we incurred directly related to the acquisition of KICO. Theses costs consist of fees for legal, accounting and appraisal services.
Depreciation and amortization. Depreciation and amortization includes the amortization of intangibles related to the acquisition of KICO, depreciation of the office building used in KICO’s operations, as well as depreciation of office equipment and furniture.
Interest expense.  Interest expense represents amounts we incur on our outstanding indebtedness at the then-applicable interest rates.
Interest expense – mandatorily redeemable preferred stock. Interest expense on mandatorily redeemable preferred stock represents amounts we incur on our outstanding preferred stock at the then-applicable dividend rates.
20

Gain on acquisition of Kingstone Insurance Company. Gain on acquisition represents the excess of the fair market value of the net assets acquired compared to the acquisition cost.
Interest income – CMIC note receivable.  We accrued interest income and accreted the discount on the surplus notes andof CMIC before the statutory surplusacquisition of Commercial Mutual, the plan of conversion provides that, in the event of a conversion by Commercial Mutual into a stock corporation, in exchangeKICO on July 1, 2009.
Benefit from tax.  We incur federal income tax expense (benefit) on our consolidated operations as well as state income tax expense for our relinquishing our rights to any unpaid principal and interest under the surplus notes, we would receive 100%non-insurance underwriting subsidiaries
Key Measures
Net loss ratio.  The net loss ratio is a measure of the stockunderwriting profitability of Commercial Mutual.an insurance company’s business. Expressed as a percentage, this is the ratio of net losses and LAE incurred to net premiums earned.
Net underwriting expense ratio.  The net expense ratio is a measure of an insurance company’s operational efficiency in administering its business. Expressed as a percentage, this is the ratio of the sum of acquisition costs and other underwriting expenses less ceding commission revenue less other income to net premiums earned.
Net combined ratio.  The net combined ratio is a measure of an insurance company’s overall underwriting profit. This is the sum of the net loss and net underwriting expense ratios. If the net combined ratio is at or above 100 percent, an insurance company cannot be profitable without investment income, and may not be profitable if investment income is insufficient.
Net premiums earned less expenses included in combined ratio (underwriting income).  Underwriting income is a measure of an insurance company’s overall operating profitability before items such as investment income, interest expense and income taxes.
 
Critical Accounting Policies
 
Our consolidated financial statements include the accounts of DCAP Group,Kingstone Companies, Inc. and all majority-owned and controlled subsidiaries. The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States requires our management to make estimates and assumptions in certain circumstances that affect amounts reported in our consolidated financial statements and related notes. In preparing these financial statements, our management has utilized information available including our past history, industry standards and the current economic environment, among other factors, in forming its estimates and judgments of certain amounts included in the consolidated financial statements, giving due consideration to materiality. It is possible that the ultimate outcome as anticipated by our managementman agement in formulating its estimates inherent in these financial statements might not materialize. However, application of the critical accounting policies below involves the exercise of judgment and use of assumptions as to future uncertainties and, as a result, actual results could differ from these estimates. In addition, other companies may utilize different estimates, which may impact comparability of our results of operations to those of companies in similar businesses.
 
Franchise fee revenue
21

We believe that the most critical accounting policies relate to the reporting of reserves for loss and LAE, including losses that have occurred but have not been reported prior to the reporting date, amounts recoverable from third party reinsurers, deferred policy acquisition costs, deferred income taxes, the impairment of investment securities, intangible assets and the valuation of stock based compensation (see Note 2 to the Consolidated Financial Statements - “Accounting Policies and Basis of Presentation”).
 
Franchise fee revenue on initial franchisee fees is recognized when substantially allConsolidated Results of our contractual requirements under the franchise agreement are completed.  Franchisees also pay a monthly franchise fee plus a monthly advertising fee.  We are obligated to provide marketing and training support to each franchisee.
Commission revenue (discontinued operations)Operations
 
We recognize commission revenue fromcompleted the acquisition of KICO on July 1, 2009. Accordingly, our consolidated revenues and expenses reflect significant changes as a result of this acquisition particularly through the addition of our insurance policies at the beginningunderwriting business that now includes all of the contract period.  Refundsoperations of commissions on the cancellation of insurance policies are reflected at the time of cancellation.KICO.
 
Automobile club dues are recognized equally overWe have changed the contract period.presentation of our business results by reclassifying our previously reported continuing operations based on reporting standards for insurance underwriters. The prior period disclosures have been restated to conform to the current presentation. General corporate overhead not incurred by our underwriting business is allocated to other operating expenses.
 
13
Finance income, fees and receivables (discontinued operations)
For our premium finance operations, we used the interest method to recognize interest income over the life of each loan in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standard (“SFAS”) No. 91, “Accounting for Nonrefundable Fees and Costs Associated with Originating or Acquiring Loans and Initial Direct Costs of Leases.
Upon the establishment of a premium finance contract, we recorded the gross loan payments as a receivable with a corresponding reduction for deferred interest. The deferred interest was amortized to interest income using the interest method over the life of each loan.  The weighted average interest rate charged with respect to financed insurance policies was approximately 26.1% and 26.4% per annum for the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively.
Upon completion of collection efforts, after cancellation of the underlying insurance policies, any uncollected earned interest or fees were charged off.
Allowance for finance receivable losses (discontinued operations)
Customers who purchase insurance policies are often unable to pay the premium in a lump sum and, therefore, require extended payment terms.  Premium finance involves making a loanDue to the customer that is backed byacquisition of KICO and the unearned portioncommencement of our insurance underwriting business on July 1, 2009, and the insurance premiums being financed.  No credit checks were made prior todiscontinuance of all business operations previously in place before the decision to extend credit to a customer.  Losses on finance receivables included an estimateacquisition date, the comparability of future credit losses on premium finance accounts. Credit losses on premium finance accounts occurred when the unearned premiums received from the insurer upon cancellation of a financed policy were inadequate to pay the balance of the premium finance account. After collection attempts were exhausted, the remaining account balance, including unrealized interest, was written off.  We reviewed historical trends of such losses relative to finance receivable balances to develop estimates of future losses.
Goodwill
The carrying value of goodwill was initially reviewed for impairment as of January 1, 2002,information between quarters and is reviewed annually or whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount might not be recoverable. If the fair value of the reporting unit to which goodwill relatesyears is less than the carrying amount of those operations, including unamortized goodwill, the carrying amount of goodwill is reduced accordingly with a charge to impairment expense. Based on our most recent analysis, our results of operations for the year ended December 31, 2008 include a charge to impairment expense of approximately $394,000.
Stock-based compensation
Our stock option and other equity-based compensation plans are accounted for in accordance with the recognition and measurement provisions of  SFAS No. 123 (revised 2004), “Share-Based Payment” (“SFAS 123(R)”). FAS 123(R) requires compensation costs related to share-based payment transactions, including employee stock options, to be recognized in the financial statements. In addition, we adhere to the guidance set forth within Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) Staff Accounting Bulletin (“SAB”) No. 107, which provides the Staff's views regarding the interaction between SFAS 123(R) and certain SEC rules and regulations and provides interpretations with respect to the valuation of share-based payments for public companies.
14
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In December 2007, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued SFAS No. 141R “Business Combinations” (“SFAS 141R”). SFAS 141R establishes principles and requirements for how the acquirer of a business recognizes and measures in its financial statements the identifiable assets acquired, the liabilities assumed, and any noncontrolling interest in the acquiree. SFAS 141R also provides guidance for recognizing and measuring the goodwill acquired in the business combination and determines what information to disclose to enable users of the financial statements to evaluate the nature and financial effects of the business combination.  SFAS 141R is effective for our fiscal year beginning January 1, 2009.  We are currently evaluating this statement for the impact, if any, that SFAS 141R will have on our consolidated financial position and results of operations.
In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157, “Fair Value Measurements” (“SFAS 157”).  SFAS 157 defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value and expands disclosure requirements about fair value measurements. SFAS 157 was effective for us on January 1, 2008. However, in February 2008, the FASB released FASB Staff Position (FSP FAS 157-2 — Effective Date of FASB Statement No. 157), which delayed the effective date of SFAS 157 for all nonfinancial assets and liabilities, except those that are recognized or disclosed at fair value in the financial statements on a recurring basis (at least annually). The adoption of SFAS 157 for our financial assets and liabilities did not have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements. We do not believe the adoption of SFAS 157 for our nonfinancial assets and liabilities, effective January 1, 2009, will have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.
 In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159, “The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities” (“SFAS 159”). SFAS 159 permits companies to choose to measure many financial instruments and certain other items at fair value. The objective is to improve financial reporting by providing companies with the opportunity to mitigate volatility in reported earnings caused by measuring related assets and liabilities differently without having to apply complex hedge accounting provisions. SFAS 159 is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007. Companies are not allowed to adopt SFAS 159 on a retrospective basis unless they choose early adoption. We adopted SFAS 159 in 2008, and did not elect the fair value option for eligible items that existed at the date of adoption.
In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 160, “Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements, an amendment of ARB No. 51” (“SFAS 160”). The new standard changes the accounting and reporting of noncontrolling interests, which have historically been referred to as minority interests. SFAS 160 requires that noncontrolling interests be presented in the consolidated balance sheets within shareholders’ equity, but separate from the parent’s equity, and that the amount of consolidated net income attributable to the parent and to the noncontrolling interest be clearly identified and presented in the consolidated statements of income. Any losses in excess of the noncontrolling interest’s equity interest will continue to be allocated to the noncontrolling interest. Purchases or sales of equity interests that do not result in a change of control will be accounted for as equity transactions. Upon a loss of control, the interest sold, as well as any interest retained, will be measured at fair value, with any gain or loss recognized in earnings. In partial acquisitions, when control is obtained, the acquiring company will recognize, at fair value, 100% of the assets and liabilities, including goodwill, as if the entire target company had been acquired. SFAS 160 is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning on or after December 15, 2008, with early adoption prohibited. The new standard will be applied prospectively, except for the presentation and disclosure requirements, which will be applied retrospectively for all periods presented. We have not yet determined the impact, if any, that this statement will have on our consolidated financial statements and we will adopt the standard at the beginning of fiscal 2009.
15
In March 2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 161, “Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities—an amendment of FASB Statement No. 133” (“SFAS 161”). SFAS 161 applies to all entities.  SFAS 161 changes the disclosure requirements for derivative instruments and hedging activities. Entities are required to provide enhanced disclosures about (a) how and why an entity uses derivative instruments, (b) how derivative instruments and related hedged items are accounted for under SFAS No. 133 and its related interpretations, and (c) how derivative instruments and related hedged items affect an entity’s financial position, financial performance, and cash flows.  SFAS 161 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after November 15, 2008, with early application encouraged.  SFAS 161 encourages, but does not require, comparative disclosures for earlier periods at initial adoption. We are currently evaluating this statement for the impact, if any, that SFAS 161 will have on our consolidated financial position and results of operations.
In April 2008, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position ("FSP") No. 142-3, “Determination of the Useful Life of Intangible Assets” ("FSP 142-3"). FSP 142-3 removes the requirement under SFAS 142 to consider whether an intangible asset can be renewed without substantial cost of material modifications to the existing terms and conditions, and replaces it with a requirement that an entity consider its own historical experience in renewing similar arrangements, or a consideration of market participant assumptions in the absence of historical experience. FSP 142-3 also requires entities to disclose information that enables users of financial statements to assess the extent to which the expected future cash flows associated with the asset are affected by the entity's intent and/or ability to renew or extend the arrangement. The guidance will become effective as of the beginning of our fiscal year beginning after December 15, 2008. We are currently evaluating the impact this standard will have on our financial statements.
In June 2008, the FASB ratified Emerging Issues Task Force (“EITF”) No. 07-5, “Determining Whether an Instrument (or an Embedded Feature) Is Indexed to an Entity's Own Stock” ("EITF 07-5"). EITF 07-5 provides that an entity should use a two-step approach to evaluate whether an equity-linked financial instrument (or embedded feature) is indexed to its own stock, including evaluating the instrument's contingent exercise and settlement provisions. EITF 07-5 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008. Early application is not permitted. We are assessing the potential impact of this EITF on our financial condition and results of operations.
16
In June 2008, the FASB issued FSP EITF 03-6-1, “Determining Whether Instruments Granted in Share-Based Payment Transactions Are Participating Securities” (“EITF 03-6-1”).  EITF 03-6-1 clarifies that all outstanding unvested share-based payment awards that contain rights to non-forfeitable dividends participate in undistributed earnings with common shareholders. Awards of this nature are considered participating securities and the two-class method of computing basic and diluted earnings per share must be applied. EITF 03-6-1 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008. We are currently evaluating the potential impact, if any; the new pronouncement will have on our consolidated financial statements.
In October 2008, the FASB issued FSP No. 157-3, “Determining the Fair Value of a Financial Asset When the Market for That Is Asset Not Active” (“FSP 157-3”) with an immediate effective date, including prior periods for which financial statements have not been issued. FSP 157-3 clarifies the application of fair value in inactive markets and allows for the use of management's internal assumptions about future cash flows with appropriately risk-adjusted discount rates when relevant observable market data does not exist. The objective of SFAS 157 has not changed and continues to be the determination of the price that would be received in an orderly transaction that is not a forced liquidation or distressed sale at the measurement date. The adoption of FSP 157-3 did not have a material effect on our results of operations, financial position or liquidity.
 Results of Operationsmeaningful.
 
In December 2008, due to declining revenues and profits, we made a decision to restructure our network of retail offices (the “Retail Business”). The plan of restructuring called for the closing of seven of our least profitable locations during December 2008 and the sale of the remaining 19 Retail Business locations. On March 30,April 17, 2009, an asset purchase agreement (the “Purchase Agreement”) was fully executed pursuant to which we agreed to sellsold substantially all of the assets, including the book of business, of the 16 remaining Retail Business locations that we ownowned in New York State (the “Assets”“New York Sale”). The closingEffective June 30, 2009, we sold all of the saleoutstanding stock of the Assets is subject to a number of conditions.subsidiary that operated our three remaining Retail Business locations in Pennsylvania (the “Pennsylvania Sale”).  As a result of the restructuring in December 2008, the New York Sale on April 17, 2009 and the Purchase Agreement on MarchPennsylva nia Sale effective June 30, 2009, our Retail Business has been reclassifiedpresented as discontinued operations and prior periods have been restated.
Effective May 1, 2009, we sold all of the outstanding stock of the subsidiaries that operated our DCAP franchise business.  As a result of the sale, our franchise business has been presented as discontinued operations and prior periods have been restated.
 
On February 1, 2008, we sold our outstanding premium finance loan portfolio. As a result of the sale, our premium financing operations have been reclassifiedpresented as discontinued operations.
 
Separate discussions follow for results of continuing operations and discontinued operations.
 
22


  Years ended December 31,    
($ in thousands) 2009  2008  Change  Percent 
 Revenues
            
 Net premiums earned $4,526  $-  $4,526  (A) 
 Ceding commission revenue  2,215   -   2,215  (A) 
 Net investment income  226   -   226  (A) 
 Net realized loss on investments  (31)  -   (31) (A) 
 Other income  730   430   300   69.8%
 Total revenues  7,666   430   7,236   1,682.8%
                 
 Expenses
                
 Loss and loss adjustment expenses  2,036   -   2,036  (A) 
 Commission expense  2,233   -   2,233  (A) 
 Other underwriting expenses  1,644   -   1,644  (A) 
 Other operating expenses  1,182   1,156   26   2.2%
 Acquistion transaction costs  210   33   177   536.4%
 Depreciation and amortization  269   37   232   627.0%
 Interest expense  184   271   (87)  (32.1)  %
 Interest expense - mandatorily      -         
 redeemable preferred stock  127   66   61   92.4%
 Total expenses  7,885   1,563   6,322   404.5%
                 
 Loss from operations  (219)  (1,133)  914   (80.7)  %
 Gain on acquistion of                
 Kingstone Insurance Company  5,178   -   5,178  (A)%
 Interest income-CMIC note receivable  61   765   (704)  (92.0)  %
 Income (loss) from continuing operations                
 before taxes  5,020   (368)  5,388  (A)
 Benefit from income tax  (67)  (447)  380   (85.0)  %
 Income from continuing operations  5,087   79   5,008  (A)
 Loss from discontinued operations,                
 net of taxes  (266)  (1,056)  790   (74.8)  %
 Net income (loss)
  4,821   (977)  5,798  (A)
                 
 Percent of total revenues:                
 Net premiums earned  59.0%  0.0%        
 Ceding commission revenue  28.9%  0.0%        
 Net investment income  2.9%  0.0%        
 Net realized gains on investments  -0.4%  0.0%        
 Other income  9.5%  100.0%        
   100.0%  100.0%        
(A) Not applicable due to the acquisition of KICO on July 1, 2009
Continuing Operations
The following table summarizes the changes in the significant components of the results of continuing operations (in thousands) for the periods indicated:
17

  December 31, 
        Change 
  2008  2007   $   % 
Commissions and fee revenue $911  $649  $262   40%
General and administrtaive expenses  1,860   2,275   (415)  (18) %
Interest expense  271   432   (161)  (37) %
Interest income - notes receivable  765   1,288   (523)  (41) %
(Loss) from continuing operations before taxes  (587)  (885)  298   34%
(Benefit from) income taxes  (391)  (419)  28   7%
(Loss) from continuing operations  (196)  (465)  269   58%
 
During the year ended December 31, 20082009 (“2008”2009”), revenues from continuing operations were $911,000$7,666,000, as compared to $649,000$430,000 for the year ended December 31, 20072008 (“2007”2008”).  The 40%increase in total revenues was due to the increases in all sources of revenue stemming from the acquisition of KICO that occurred on July 1, 2009.
Net investment income of $226,000 and net realized losses on investments of $31,000 for 2009 were attributable to the acquisition of KICO on July 1, 2009. The positive cash flow from operations was the result of the aforementioned acquisition. The tax equivalent investment yield, excluding cash, was 4.91% at December 31, 2009. Realized capital gains from securities acquired in the KICO acquisition had a cost basis equal to their fair market value as of the acquisition date on July 1, 2009.
23

Total expenses in 2009 were $7,885,000, as compared to $1,563,000 in 2008. The increase in total expenses in both periods was due to the increases in all categories of $262,000expenses stemming from the acquisition of KICO that occurred on July 1, 2009.
Gain on acquisition of Kingstone Insurance Company of $5,178,000 in commissions and fees2009 is attributable to the bargain purchase which was a result of $427,000 in premium finance placement fees earned in 2008,the excess of net assets acquired from KICO compared to none in 2007. Effective February 1, 2008, we began earning placement fees in accordance with the terms of the sale of our premium finance portfolio. The increase in revenue was offset by a reduction of $110,000 in initial franchise fees, due to a lack of new franchises in 2008 compared to five in 2007.acquisition cost.
 
Our general and administrative expensesInterest income from CMIC notes receivable in 2008 were $1,860,000,2009 was $61,000, as compared to $2,275,000$765,000 in 2007.2009. The 18% decrease of $415,000 was primarily attributable to decreases in: (i) franchise advertising costs, (ii) executive compensation, and (iii) fees paid to consultants.
Our interest expense in 2008 was $271,000, as compared to $432,000 in 2007. The 37% decrease of $161,000 was primarily due to: (i) a reduction in the principal balance of our debt and (ii) our no longer allocating a portion of the interest on our revolving credit line from our discontinued premium finance business to continuing operations.
Our interest income from notes receivable in 2008 was $765,000, as compared to $1,288,000 in 2007. The 41% decrease of $523,000 was primarily due to: (i) the discount on surplus notes and the accrued interest at the time of acquisition being fully accreted in July 2008, and (ii) a reduction in the variable interest rate in 20082009 due to a decrease in the prime rate.rate and (iii) the forgiveness of the notes receivable in exchange for our 100% equity interest of KICO on July 1, 2009.
 
Our continuing operations generated a net loss beforeThe benefit from income taxes of $587,000(including state taxes) was $67,000 in 20082009, as compared to a net loss beforetax benefit of $447,000 in 2008. The tax benefit on income taxes of $885,000 in 2007.  The 34% decrease of $298,000 was primarily duefrom continuing operations is attributable to the inceptiongain on acquisition of earning premium finance placement feesKICO being treated as a permanent difference for income tax purposes. In addition, the tax benefit resulting from the losses of discontinued operations was recorded in 2008 and reductions in general and administrative and interest expenses, offset by a decrease in interest income from our surplus notes.continuing operations.
 
Discontinued Operations
 
Premium Finance
The following table summarizes the changes in the results of our premium finance discontinued operations (in thousands) for the periods indicated:
18
  Years ended 
  December 31, 
        Change 
   2008*  2007  $   % 
Premium finance revenue $225  $3,167  $(2,942)  (93) %
                 
Operating Expenses:                
General and administrative expenses  182   1,432   (1,250)  (87) %
Provision for finance receivable losses  89   472   (383)  (81) %
Depreciation and amortization  47   100   (53)  (53) %
Interest expense  45   646   (601)  (93) %
Total operating expenses  363   2,650   (2,287)  (86) %
                 
(Loss) income from operations  (138)  517   (655)  (127) %
Loss on sale of premium financing portfolio  (102)  -   (102)  -%
(Loss) income before provision for income taxes  (240)  517   (757)  (146) %
Provision for income taxes  69   246   (177)  (72) %
(Loss) income from discontinued operations $(309) $271  $(580)  (214) %
___________________
* Our premium finance portfolio was sold on February 1, 2008.  Premium finance revenue for 2008 only includes the period from January 1, 2008 through January 31, 2008.
Our premium finance revenue decreased $2,942,000 in 2008 as compared to 2007. The 93% decrease is due to only including one month of revenue in 2008 compared to 12 months in 2007.
 Our general and administrative expenses from discontinued operations decreased $1,250,000 in 2008 as compared to 2007.  The 87% decrease is due to only including one month of operating expenses related to revenue in 2008 compared to 12 months in 2007.
Our provision for finance receivable losses for 2008 was $383,000 less than for 2007.  The 81% decrease was due to the discontinuance of loan originations offset by a provision for losses from loans originated in the prior year.
Our premium finance interest expense for 2008 was $601,000 less than for 2007.  The 93% decrease was due to the payment in full of the outstanding balance of our revolving credit line on February 1, 2008.
Loss on sale of premium financing portfolio was $102,000 in 2008, compared to no such loss in 2007. The 2008 loss was primarily due to $83,000 in fees related to the sale of our premium finance portfolio, and an adjustment to the selling price as a result of a change in the estimated collectible amount of the portfolio.
Our discontinued premium finance operations, on a stand-alone basis, generated a net loss before income taxes of $240,000 in 2008 as compared to a net profit before income taxes of $517,000 in 2007.  The decrease in profit of $757,000 in 2008 was primarily due to: (i) the cessation of revenues as of January 31, 2008, and (ii) the loss on sale of our premium financing portfolio, offset by the elimination and reductions in operating expenses.
19
Retail Business
 
The following table summarizes the changes in the results of our Retail Business discontinued operations (in thousands) for the periods indicated:
 
 Years ended  Years ended December 31, 
 December 31, 
       Change 
 2008  2007   $   % 
($ in thousands) 2009  2008  Change  Percent 
                         
Commissions and fee revenue $4,042  $5,096  $(1,054)  (21) % $1,029  $4,042  $(3,013)  (75) %
                                
Operating Expenses:                                
General and administrative expenses  3,895   4,479   (584)  (13) %  1,227   3,894   (2,667)  (68) %
Depreciation and amortization  212   204   8   4%  59   212   (153)  (72) %
Interest expense  41   44   (3)  (7) %  12   41   (29)  (71) %
Impairment of goodwill and intangibles  394   95   299   315%
Impairment of intangibles  49   394   (345)  n/a 
Total operating expenses  4,542   4,822   (280)  (6) %  1,347   4,541   (3,194)  (70) %
                                
(Loss) income from operations  (500)  274   (774)  (282) %
Gain on sale of book of business  -   66   (66)  (100) %
(Loss) income before provision for income taxes  (500)  340   (840)  (247) %
Loss from operations  (318)  (499)  181   (36) %
Gain on sale of business  21   -   21   n/a 
Loss before benefit from income taxes  (297)  (499)  202   (40) %
(Benefit from) provision for income taxes  (28)  193   (221)  (115) %  (77)  29   (106)  n/a 
(Loss) income from discontinued operations $(472) $147  $(619)  (421) %
                
Loss from discontinued operations $(220) $(528) $308   (58) %
Our
The decrease in revenue and expenses in our discontinued Retail Business revenue was $4,042,000 in 20082009 as compared to $5,096,000 in 2007.  The 21% revenue decrease of $1,054,000 was primarily attributable to a reduction in commissions and fees earned due to the sale of fewer insurance policies in 2008 than in 2007.  Such reduction in sales was generally caused by the continued heightened competition from the voluntary insurance market, which is offering lower premium rates to our main customer, the non-standard insured.
Our Retail Business general and administrative expenses in 2008 were $3,895,000, as compared to $4,479,000 in 2007. The 13% net decrease of $584,000 was primarily attributable to decreases in fixed and variable compensation paid to employees due to a reduction in policies sold at our stores, and a reduction in advertising expenses, offset by an increase in occupancy costs due to rent increases and escalations.
Our Retail Business impairment of goodwill and intangibles for 2008 was $299,000 greater than for 2007. The increase in 2008 was due to goodwill impairment of $394,000 in 2008, comparedattributable to the cessation of utilizationoperations of the vanity telephone number included16 remaining stores located in intangible assets in 2007.
Our gain onNew York as a result of the sale of booktheir assets on April 17, 2009, and the sale of business in 2008 was $-0-, as compared to $66,000 in 2007. The $66,000 decrease in 2008 was due to a sale in 2007, compared to no such sales in 2008.our Pennsylvania stores on June 30, 2009.
 
24
20

During 2008, we recorded a benefit from income taxes of $28,000 compared to a provision for income taxes of $193,000 in 2007. The change of $221,000 is due to an $840,000 decrease in income before taxes in 2008 as compared to 2007.
Our discontinued RetailFranchise Business operations, on a stand-alone basis, generated a net loss before income taxes of $500,000 in 2008 as compared to a net profit before income taxes of $340,000 in 2007.  The decrease in profit of $840,000 in 2008 was primarily due to the $1,054,000 decrease in revenues, and increase in impairment of intangibles, offset by a decrease in general and administrative expenses.
Net Loss
 
The following table summarizes the changes in the results of our change in net lossfranchise business discontinued operations (in thousands) for the periods indicated.indicated:
  Years ended December 31, 
($ in thousands) 2009  2008  Change  Percent 
             
Commissions and fee revenue $214  $486  $(272)  (56) %
                 
Operating Expenses:                
General and administrative expenses  180   672   (492)  (73) %
Depreciation and amortization  2   33   (31)  (94) %
Total operating expenses  182   705   (523)  (74) %
                 
Income (loss) from operations  32   (219)  251   (115) %
Loss on sale of business  (78)  -   (78)  n/a 
Loss before provision for income taxes  (46)  (219)  173   (79) %
Provision for income taxes  -   -   -   n/a 
Loss from discontinued operations $(46) $(219) $173   (79) %
The decrease in revenue and expenses in our discontinued franchise business in 2009 as compared to 2008 was a result of the sale on May 1, 2009 of all of the outstanding stock of the subsidiaries that operated our DCAP franchise business.
Premium Finance
The following table summarizes the changes in the results of our premium finance discontinued operations (in thousands) for the periods indicated:
 
  Years ended 
  December 31, 
        Change 
  2008  2007   $   % 
Loss from continuing operations $(196) $(465) $269   58%
(Loss) income from discontinued operations, net of taxes  (781)  418   (1,199)  (287) %
Net loss $(977) $(47) $(930)  1,979%
  Years ended December 31, 
($ in thousands) 2009  2008  Change  Percent 
             
Premium finance revenue $-  $225  $(225)  (100) %
                 
Operating Expenses:                
General and administrative expenses  -   271   (271)  (100) %
Provision for finance receivable losses  -   -   -   n/a%
Depreciation and amortization  -   46   (46)  (100) %
Interest expense  -   46   (46)  (100) %
Total operating expenses  -   363   (363)  (100) %
                 
Loss from operations  -   (138)  138   (100) %
Loss on sale of premium financing portfolio  -   (102)  102   (100) %
Loss before benefit from income taxes  -   (240)  240   (100) %
Provision for income taxes  -   69   (69)  n/a 
Loss from discontinued operations $-  $(309) $309   (100) %
 
There was no activity in our discontinued premium finance business in 2009. Our net losspremium finance portfolio was sold on February 1, 2008.  Premium finance operations for 2008 only includes the year ended Decemberperiod from January 1, 2008 through January 31, 20082008.
25

Net income
Net income was $977,000 as$4,821,000 for 2009, compared to a net loss of $47,000$977,000 in 2008. The increase in net income was due to the inclusion of KICO’s operations effective July 1, 2009, the gain on acquisition of KICO, and the cessation of our discontinued operations.
Insurance Underwriting Business on a Standalone Basis
Our insurance underwriting business reported on a standalone basis for the year endedperiod from July 1, 2009 (date of KICO acquisition) through December 31, 2007.2009 follows:

 Revenues
   
 Net premiums earned $4,526,341 
 Ceding commission revenue  2,215,081 
 Net investment income  225,676 
 Net realized loss on investments  (30,628)
 Other income  130,270 
 Total revenues  7,066,740 
     
 Expenses
    
 Loss and loss adjustment expenses  2,035,471 
 Commission expense  2,233,399 
 Other underwriting expenses  1,643,473 
 Acquistion transaction costs  91,635 
 Depreciation and amortization  253,162 
 Total expenses  6,257,140 
     
 Income from operations  809,600 
 Income tax expense  292,904 
 Net income
 $516,696 
The key measures for our insurance underwriting business for the period from July 1, 2009 (date of KICO acquisition) through December 31, 2009 follows:
26

 Net premiums earned $4,526,341 
 Ceding commission revenue  2,215,081 
 Other income   130,270  
     
 Loss and loss adjustment expenses  2,035,471 
     
 Acquistion costs and other underwriting expenses:    
 Commission expense  2,233,399 
 Other underwriting expenses  1,643,473 
 Total acquistion costs and other underwriting expenses  3,876,872 
     
 Underwriting income $959,349 
     
 Key Measures:    
 Net loss ratio  45.0%
 Net underwriting expense ratio  33.8%
 Net combined ratio  78.8%
     
 Reconciliation of net underwriting expense ratio:    
 Acquisition costs and other underwriting expenses $3,876,872 
 Less: Ceding commission revenue  (2,215,081
     Less: Other income  (130,270
    $1,531,521 
     
 Net earned premium $4,526,341 
Investments
Portfolio Summary
The following table presents a breakdown of the amortized cost, aggregate fair value and unrealized gains and losses by investment type as of December 31, 2009:
   Cost or  Gross  Gross Unrealized Losses     % of 
  Amortized  Unrealized  Less than 12  More than 12  Fair  Fair 
 Category
 
Cost
  Gains  Months  Months  Value  Value 
                   
 U.S. Treasury securities and                  
 obligations of U.S. government                  
 corporations and agencies $3,549,616  $38,790  $(23,929) $-  $3,564,477   23.4%
                         
 Political subdivisions of states,                        
 territories and possessions  5,751,979   82,480   (12,356)  -   5,822,103   38.3%
                         
 Corporate and other bonds                        
 Industrial and miscellaneous  3,375,272   54,384   (25,156)  -   3,404,500   22.4%
 Total fixed-maturity securities  12,676,867   175,654   (61,441)  -   12,791,080   84.1%
 Equity securities  1,973,738   224,736   (11,548)  -   2,186,926   14.4%
 Short term investments  225,336   -   -   -   225,336   1.5%
 Total $14,875,941  $400,390  $(72,989) $-  $15,203,342   100.0%
27

Credit Rating of Fixed-Maturity Securities
The table below summarizes the credit quality of our fixed-maturity securities as of December 31, 2009 as rated by Standard and Poor’s.
     Percentage of 
  Fair Market  Fair Market 
  Value  Value 
Rating      
U.S. Treasury securities $3,564,477   27.9%
AAA  3,404,461   26.6%
AA  2,564,302   20.0%
A  2,808,145   22.0%
BBB  449,695   3.5%
Total $12,791,080   100.0%
The table below summarizes the average duration by type of fixed-maturity security as well as detailing the average yield as of December 31, 2009:
     Average 
  Average  Duration in 
 Category
 Yield %  Years 
 U.S. Treasury securities and      
 obligations of U.S. government      
 corporations and agencies  3.08%  5.8 
         
 Political subdivisions of states,        
 territories and possessions  4.19%  6.0 
         
 Corporate and other bonds        
 Industrial and miscellaneous  5.62%  8.5 
Fair Value Consideration
 As disclosed in Note 5 to the Consolidated Financial Statements, with respect to “Fair Value Measurements,” effective January 1, 2008, we adopted new GAAP guidance, which provides a revised definition of fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value and expands financial statements disclosure requirements for fair value. Under this guidance, fair value is defined as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants (an “exit price”). The statement establishes a fair value hierarchy that distinguishes between inputs based on market data from independent sources (“observable inputs”) and a reporting entity’s internal assumptions based upon the best information available when external m arket data is limited or unavailable (“unobservable inputs”). The fair value hierarchy in GAAP prioritizes fair value measurements into three levels based on the nature of the inputs. Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets have the highest priority (“Level 1”), followed by observable inputs other than quoted prices including prices for similar but not identical assets or liabilities (“Level 2”), and unobservable inputs, including the reporting entity’s estimates of the assumption that market participants would use, having the lowest priority (“Level 3”). As of December 31, 2009, 100% of the investment portfolio recorded at fair value was priced based upon quoted market prices.
28

As more fully described in Note 4 to our Consolidated Financial Statements, “Investments—Impairment Review,” we completed a detailed review of all our securities in a continuous loss position, and concluded that the unrealized losses in these asset classes are the result of a decrease in value due to technical spread widening and broader market sentiment, rather than fundamental collateral deterioration, and are temporary in nature.
The table below summarizes the gross unrealized losses of our fixed-maturity and equity securities by length of time the security has continuously been in an unrealized loss position as of December 31, 2009:
  Less than 12 months  12 months or more  Total 
     Unreal-  No. of     Unreal-       
  Fair  ized  Positions  Fair  ized  Fair  Unrealized 
 Category
 Value  Losses  Held  Value  Losses  Value  Losses 
                      
 Fixed-Maturity Securities:                     
 U.S. Treasury securities and                     
 obligations of U.S. government                     
 corporations and agencies $1,715,062  $(23,929)  6  $-  $-  $1,715,062  $(23,929)
                             
 Political subdivisions of states,                            
 territories and possessions  1,357,203   (12,356)  5   -   -   1,357,203   (12,356)
                             
 Corporate and other bonds                            
 Industrial and miscellaneous  1,376,516   (25,156)  7   -   -   1,376,516   (25,156)
 Total fixed-maturity securities  4,448,781   (61,441)  18   -   -   4,448,781   (61,441)
                             
 Equity Securities:                            
 Preferred stocks $144,900  $(5,564)  3  $-  $-  $144,900  $(5,564)
 Common stocks  94,470   (5,984)  5   -   -   94,470   (5,984)
 Total equity securities  239,370   (11,548)  8   -   -   239,370   (11,548)
                             
 Total $4,688,151  $(72,989)  26  $-  $-  $4,688,151  $(72,989)
There are 26 securities at December 31, 2009 that account for the gross unrealized loss, none of which is deemed by us to be other than temporarily impaired. Significant factors influencing our determination that unrealized losses were temporary included the magnitude of the unrealized losses in relation to each security’s cost, the nature of the investment and management’s intent not to sell these securities and it being not more likely than not that we will be required to sell these investments before anticipated recovery of fair value to our cost basis.
 
Liquidity and Capital Resources
 
AsCash Flows
Effective July 1, 2009, the primary sources of December 31, 2008,cash flow is from our insurance underwriting subsidiary, KICO, which are gross premiums written, ceding commissions from our quota share reinsurers, loss payments by our reinsurers, investment income and proceeds from the sale or maturity of investments. Funds are used by KICO for ceded premium payments to reinsurers, which are paid on a net basis after subtracting losses paid on reinsured claims and reinsurance commissions. KICO also uses funds for loss payments and loss adjustment expenses on our net business, commissions to producers, salaries and other underwriting expenses as well as to purchase investments and fixed assets.
29

In connection with the plan of conversion of CMIC, we had $142,949have agreed with the Insurance Department that for a period of two years following the effective date of conversion of July 1, 2009, no dividend may be paid by KICO to us without the approval of the Insurance Department. We have also agreed with the Insurance Department that any intercompany transaction between KICO and us must be filed with the Insurance Department 30 days prior to implementation.
The primary sources of cash flow for our holding company operations are in connection with the fee income we receive from the premium finance loans and collection of principal and interest income from the notes received by us upon the sale of businesses that were included in our discontinued operations. If the aforementioned is insufficient to cover our holding company cash requirements, we will seek to obtain additional financing.
We believe that our present cash flows as described above will be sufficient on a short-term basis and over the next 12 months to fund our company-wide working capital requirements.
Our reconciliation of net income to cash provided from operations is generally influenced by the collection of premiums in advance of paid losses, the timing of reinsurance, issuing company settlements and loss payments.
Cash flow and liquidity are categorized into three sources: (1) operating activities; (2) investing activities; and (3) financing activities, which are shown in the following table:
Years Ended December 31, 2009  2008 
       
 Cash flows provided by (used in):      
 Operating activities $1,199,388  $(752,640)
 Investing activities  (313,057)  1,033,901 
 Financing activities  (403,960)  (1,169,134)
 Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents  482,371   (887,873)
 Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of year  142,949   1,030,822 
 Cash and cash equivalents, end of year
 $625,320  $142,949 
Net cash provided by operating activities was $1,199,000 in 2009. Net cash used in operations was $753,000 in 2008. The increase in cash flow in 2009 was primarily a result of additional operating cash flows provided through the acquisition of KICO on July 1, 2009.
Net cash flows used in investing activities were $313,000 in 2009 compared to $1,034,000 provided in 2008. The decrease in cash flow in 2009 was primarily a result of the additional investing cash flows used through the acquisition of KICO on July 1, 2009, offset by the proceeds collected from the sale of our discontinued operations during the first six months of 2009.
Net cash used in financing activities during 2009 was $404,000, due to $1,448,000 of principal payments on long-term debt and cash equivalentslease obligations, offset by $1,050,000 of proceeds from newly issued long-term debt. The acquisition of KICO on July 1, 2009 had no effect on our financing activities.
30

Significant Transactions in 2009
Sale of Businesses
On April 17, 2009, we sold substantially all of the assets, including the book of business, of the 16 Retail Business locations that we owned in New York State (the “New York Assets”). The purchase price for the New York Assets was approximately $2,337,000, of which approximately $1,786,000 was paid at closing.  Promissory notes in the aggregate approximate original principal amount of $551,000 (the “New York Notes”) were also delivered at the closing. The New York Notes are payable in installments of approximately $73,000 on March 31, 2010 (which was paid), monthly installments of $50,000 each between April 30, 2010 and November 30, 2010 and a working capital deficitpayment of $175,105.approximately $105,000 on November 30, 2010, and provide for interest at the rate of 12.625% per annum. As additional consideration, we will be entitled to receive through September 30, 2010 an amount equal to 60% of December 31, 2007,the net commissions derived from the book of business of six retail locations that we had $1,030,822closed in cash and cash equivalents and a working capital deficit of $1,603,288.2008.
 
During 2007,Effective June 30, 2009, we sold all of the outstanding stock of the subsidiary that operated our three remaining Pennsylvania stores (the “Pennsylvania Stock”).  The purchase price for the Pennsylvania Stock was approximately $397,000 which was paid by delivery of two promissory notes, one in the approximate principal amount of $238,000 and payable with interest at the rate of 9.375% per annum in 120 equal monthly installments, and the other in the approximate principal amount of $159,000 and payable with interest at the rate of 6% per annum in 60 monthly installments commencing August 10, 2011 (with interest only being payable prior to such date).
Effective May 1, 2009, we sold all of the outstanding stock of the subsidiaries that operated our DCAP franchise business.  The purchase price for the stock was $200,000 which was paid by delivery of a promissory note in such principal amount (the “Franchise Note”).  The Franchise Note is payable in installments of $50,000 on May 15, 2009 (which was paid), $50,000 on May 1, 2010 and $100,000 on May 1, 2011 and provides for interest at the rate of 5.25% per annum.
Redemption and Exchange of Debt
Accurate Acquisition
On April 17, 2009, we paid the balance of the note payable incurred in connection with our purchase of the Accurate agency business.
Notes Payable
In August 2008, the holders of $1,500,000 outstanding principal amount of notes payable (the “Notes Payable”) agreed to extend the maturity date of the debt from September 30, 2007 to September 30, 2008.  In August 2008, the maturity date of the Notes Payable was further extended from September 30, 2008 to the earlier of July 10, 2009 or 90 days following the conversion of Commercial Mutual Insurance Company (“CMIC”) to a stock property and casualty insurance company and the issuance to us of a controlling interest in Commercial MutualCMIC (subject to acceleration under certain circumstances).  In exchange for this extension, the holders arewere entitled to receive an aggregate incentive payment equal to $10,000 times the number of months (or partial months) the debt iswas outstanding after September 30, 2008 through the maturity date. IfThe agreement provided that, if a prepayment of principal reducesreduced the debt below $1,500,000, the incentive paymentpay ment for all subsequent months willwould be reduced in proportion to any such reduction to the debt. The agreement also provided that the aggregate incentive payment iswas due upon full repayment of the debt.  The $1,500,000
31

On May 12, 2009, three of the holders exchanged an aggregate of $519,231 of Notes Payable principal balancefor Series E Preferred Stock having an aggregate redemption amount equal to such aggregate principal amount of notes (see discussion below). Concurrently, we paid $49,543 to the three holders, which amount represents all accrued and unpaid interest and incentive payments through the date of exchange. In addition, on May 12, 2009, we prepaid $686,539 in principal of the Notes Payable is included in our December 31, 2008 balance sheet under “Current portionto the five remaining holders of long-term debt.”  the notes, together with $81,200, which amount represents accrued and unpaid interest and incentive payments on such prepayment.
 
On June 29, 2009, we prepaid the remaining $294,230 in principal of the Notes Payable, together with $19,400, which amount represents accrued and unpaid interest and incentive payments on such prepayment.
21
From June 2009 through December 2009, we borrowed an aggregate $1,050,000 and issued promissory notes in such aggregate principal amount (the “2009 Notes”).  The 2009 Notes provide for interest at the rate of 12.625% per annum and are payable on July 10, 2011. The 2009 Notes are prepayable by us without premium or penalty; provided, however, that, under any circumstances, the holders of the 2009 Notes are entitled to receive an aggregate of six months interest from the issue date of the 2009 Notes with respect to the amount prepaid. Between January 2010 and March 2010, we borrowed an additional $400,000 on the same terms as provided for in the 2009 Notes.
Exchange of Mandatorily Redeemable Preferred Stock
Effective April 16, 2008,May 12, 2009, the holder of our Series B preferred shares (which provided for dividends at the rate of 5% per annum and an outside mandatory redemption date of April 30, 2008)D Preferred Stock exchanged such shares for an equal number of shares of Series C preferred shares (which provided for dividends at the rate of 10% per annum and an outside mandatory redemption date of April 30, 2009).  Effective August 23, 2008, the outside mandatory redemption date for the preferred shares was further extended toE Preferred Stock which are mandatorily redeemable on July 31, 2009 through the issuance of Series D preferred shares in exchange for the Series C preferred shares. The mandatorily redeemable balance of $780,000 is included in our December 31, 2008 balance sheet under “Current Liabilities”. 2011.
 
On March 30,Exchange of Note Receivables and Acquisition of Kingstone Insurance Company
Effective July 1, 2009, CMIC converted from an asset purchase agreement (the “Purchase Agreement”) was fully executed pursuantadvance premium cooperative to which our wholly-owned subsidiaries, Barry Scott Agency, Inc.a stock property and DCAP Accurate, Inc. agreed to sell substantially all of their assets, includingcasualty insurance company. Upon the book of business,effectiveness of the 16 Retail Business locations thatconversion, CMIC’s name was changed to Kingstone Insurance Company (“KICO”). Pursuant to the plan of conversion, we ownacquired a 100% equity interest in New York State (the “Assets”).  The closingKICO in consideration of the saleexchange of the Assets is subject to a number of conditions.  We expect to satisfy the conditions and complete the sale of the Assets in April 2009. The purchase price for the Assets is approximately $2,337,000, of which approximately $1,786,000 is to be paid to us at closing, and the remainder of the purchase price is to be satisfied by the delivery of promissory notes in the aggregateour $3,750,000 principal amount of $551,000. As additional consideration,surplus notes of CMIC.  In addition, we will be entitledforgave all accrued and unpaid interest of $2,246,000 on the surplus notes as of the date of exchange (see Note 3 to receive through Septemberour Consolidated Financial Statements).
Reinsurance
The following table summarizes each reinsurer that accounted for approximately over 10% of our reinsurance recoverables on paid and unpaid losses and loss adjustment expenses as of December 31, 2009:
32

     Amount    
     Recoverable    
  A.M.  as of    
 ($ in thousands) Best Rating  December 31, 2009  % 
 Motors Insurance Corporation NR-5  $5,151   44.0%
 SCOR Reinsurance Company  A-   1,444   12.3%
 Folksamerica Reinsurance Company NR-5   1,066   9.1%
       7,661   65.4%
 Others      4,053   34.6%
 Total     $11,714   100.0%
Personal Lines

Our Personal Lines business, which primarily consists of homeowners’ policies, is reinsured under a 75% quota share treaty which provides coverage up to $700,000 per occurrence. For treaty year ended June 30, 2010, an amount equal to 60%excess of loss contract provides $1,200,000 in coverage excess of the net commissions derived from the book$700,000 for a total coverage of business$1,900,000 per occurrence. A total of six retail locations that were closed in 2008. The proceeds from the sale$29 million of catastrophe coverage has been provided, where we retain $500,000 of risk.
Commercial Lines

Commercial Automobile - For policies with an effective date prior to 2010, we, pursuant to a 50% quota share treaty, retain 50% of the Assets thatfirst $300,000 of loss, or a maximum loss per incident of $150,000.  In addition, we expecthave purchased excess of loss coverage to receiveprovide for coverage of up to $2,000,000 per loss.  Beginning with policies with an effective date in April 2009 will2010, where we do not be sufficienthave a quota share treaty, we retain the first $200,000 of loss, and have purchased excess of loss coverage for losses up to fully satisfy the Notes Payable and preferred stock obligations on their respective maturity dates.  We plan to seek to further extend the maturity dates and/or refinance the Notes Payable and preferred stock obligations.$2,000,000
 
We believe that, basedCommercial Lines business other than auto - Policies written by us are reinsured under an 85% quota share treaty, expiring June 30, 2010.  Personal Umbrella business written is reinsured under a 90% quota share limiting us to a maximum loss of $100,000 per risk. 
Quota Share, Excess of Loss and Catastrophe Reinsurance Agreements
Through quota share, excess of loss and catastrophe reinsurance agreements, we limit our exposure to a maximum loss on our present cash resources, and assuming that our efforts to further extend the maturity dates of the Notes Payable and preferred stock obligations,any one risk as discussed above, are successful and that we complete the sale of the Assets as contemplated, including the collection of the $551,000 of promissory notes discussed above in accordance with their terms, we will have sufficient cash on a short-term basis and over the next 12 months to fund our working capital needs.  No definitive arrangements are in place with regard to any further extension of the maturity dates and/or refinancing the Notes Payable and preferred stock obligations and no assurances can be given that any will occur on commercially reasonable terms or otherwise. No assurances can be given that we will complete the sale of the Assets as contemplated.follows:
 
During 2008, cash and cash equivalents decreased by approximately $888,000 primarily due to the following:
33



· Net cash used in operating activities during Maximum
 Loss
 Line of business Exposure
 Casualty and property (personal lines)
 July 1, 2006 - June 30, 2010 $         175,000
 July 1, 2005 - June 30, 2006 $         140,000
 July 1, 2003 - June 30, 2005 $           75,000
 July 1, 2002 - June 30, 2003 $         100,000
 Basic auto physical damage
 January 1, 2006 - December 31, 2010 100% of covered loss
 October 1, 2003 - December 31, 2005 40% of covered loss
 Private passenger auto
 July 1, 2007 - December 31, 2008 was $753,000 due primarily to the net 25% of covered loss
 Casualty and property (commercial lines)
 November 1, 2008 - June 30, 2010 15% of $977,000.  Non-cash items totaling $820,000 increased the net cash used in operating activities to $1,797,000.  These non-cash items included depreciation and amortization, bad debt expense, accretion of discount on notes receivable, amortization of warrants, stock-based payments, and deferred income taxes. The use of cash was offset by: (i) the receipt  of a $368,000 Federal tax refund claim resulting from the carry-back of ourcovered loss
 October 1, 2002 - December 31, 2003 $         100,000
 July 1, 1999 - October 1, 2002 $           25,000
 Commercial auto liability
 January 1, 2010 - December 31, 2011 $         200,000
 January 1, 2005 - December 31, 2009 $         150,000
 January 1, 2004 - December 31, 2004 $         120,000
 January 1, 2002 - December 31, 2003 $         100,000
 Commercial auto physical damage
 January 1, 2010 - December 31, 2010 $           75,000
 January 1, 2007 net operating loss, (ii) an increase in accounts payable and accrued expenses of $252,000, and (iii) cash provided by the operating activities of our discontinued operations of $498,000.- December 31, 2009 $           37,500
 January 1, 2004 - December 31, 2006 $           30,000
 January 1, 2002 - December 31, 2003 $           75,000
 
Our reinsurance program was structured while we were an advance premium cooperative and reflected our management’s obligations and goals while a policyholder-owned company. Reinsurance via quota share allows for a carrier to write business without increasing its leverage above a management determined ratio. The additional business written allows a reinsurer to assume the risks involved, but gives the reinsurer the profit (or loss) associated with such.  Since the conversion to a stock company, we have determined it to be in the best interests of our shareholders to prudently reduce our reliance on quota share reinsurance.  This will result in higher earned premiums and a reduction in ceding commission revenue in future years. Our participation in reinsurance arrangements does not relieve us from our obligatio ns to policyholders.
22
·  Net cash provided by investing activities during 2008 was $1,034,000 primarily due to the $1,008,000 cash flow from finance contracts receivable included in discontinued operations.
Inflation
 
·  Net cash used in financing activities during 2008 was $1,169,000 due to: (i) a $562,000 decrease in our revolving credit line utilized in our discontinued operations prior to the sale of our premium finance portfolio on February 1, 2008, and (ii) principal payments on long-term debt and lease obligations of $607,000.
Premiums are established before we know the amount of losses and loss adjustment expenses or the extent to which inflation may affect such amounts. We attempt to anticipate the potential impact of inflation in establishing our reserves, especially as it relates to medical and hospital rates where historical inflation rates have exceeded the general level of inflation. Inflation in excess of the levels we have assumed could cause loss and loss adjustment expenses to be higher than we anticipated, which would require us to increase reserves and reduce earnings.
 
 We have no current commitments for capital expenditures.  However, we may, from time to time, consider acquisitions
34

 Fluctuations in rates of complementary businesses, products or technologies.inflation also influence interest rates, which in turn impact the market value of our investment portfolio and yields on new investments. Operating expenses, including salaries and benefits, generally are impacted by inflation.
 
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
 
We have no off-balance sheet arrangements that have or are reasonably likely to have a current or future effect on our financial condition, changes in financial condition, revenues or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources that is material to investors.
 
Factors That May Affect Future Results and Financial Condition
 
Based upon the following factors, as well as other factors affecting our operating results and financial condition, past financial performance should not be considered to be a reliable indicator of future performance, and investors should not use historical trends to anticipate results or trends in future periods.  In addition, such factors, among others, may affect the accuracy of certain forward-looking statements contained in this Annual Report.
 
BecauseGiven our core revenue is derived from personal automobile insurance, our business may be adversely affected by negative developments in the conditions in this industry.recent acquisition of Kingstone Insurance Company, we will face new risks and uncertainties.
 
AllAs discussed in Item 1 hereof, on July 1, 2009, we completed the acquisition of our revenues from continuing operations for 2008 related100% of the issued and outstanding common stock of Kingstone Insurance Company (“KICO”) (formerly Commercial Mutual Insurance Company (“CMIC”)) pursuant to the saleconversion of personal automobile and otherCMIC from an advance premium cooperative to a stock property and casualty insurance policies. company.  We have never operated as an insurance company, and we will face all of the risks and uncertainties that come with operating such a company, including underwriting risks.
As a resultholding company, we are dependent on the results of operations of KICO; there are restrictions on the payment of dividends by KICO.
We are a holding company and a legal entity separate and distinct from our operating subsidiary, KICO. As a holding company without operations of our concentrationown, the principal sources of our funds are dividends and other payments from KICO.  Consequently, we must rely on KICO for our ability to repay debts, pay expenses and pay cash dividends to our shareholders.  In connection with the plan of conversion of CMIC, we have agreed with the New York State Insurance Department that, until July 1, 2011, without the approval of the Insurance Department, no dividend may be paid by KICO to us.
As a property and casualty insurer, we may face significant losses from catastrophes and severe weather events.
Because of the exposure of our property and casualty business to catastrophic events, our operating results and financial condition may vary significantly from one period to the next. Catastrophes can be caused by various natural and man-made disasters, including earthquakes, wildfires, tornadoes, hurricanes, storms and certain types of terrorism. We may incur catastrophe losses in this line of business, negative developmentsexcess of: (1) those that we project would be incurred, (2) those that external modeling firms estimate would be incurred, (3) the average expected level used in the economic, competitivepricing or regulatory conditions affecting the personal automobile insurance industry(4) our current reinsurance coverage limits. Despite our catastrophe management programs, we are exposed to catastrophes that could have a material adverse effect on our operating results and financial condition.  Our liquidity could be constrained by a cata strophe, or multiple catastrophes, which may result in extraordinary losses or a downgrade of operationsour financial strength ratings.
35

In addition, we are subject to claims arising from weather events such as winter storms, rain, hail and high winds. The incidence and severity of weather conditions are largely unpredictable. There is generally an increase in the frequency and severity of claims when severe weather conditions occur.
Unanticipated increases in the severity or frequency of claims may adversely affect our operating results and financial condition.
 
Changes in the severity or frequency of claims may affect our profitability. Changes in homeowners claim severity are driven by inflation in the construction industry, in building materials and in home furnishings, and by other economic and environmental factors, including increased demand for services and supplies in areas affected by catastrophes.  Changes in bodily injury claim severity are driven primarily by inflation in the medical sector of the economy and litigation. Changes in auto physical damage claim severity are driven primarily by inflation in auto repair costs, auto parts prices and used car prices. However, changes in the level of the severity of claims are not limited to the effects of inflation and demand surge in these various sectors of the economy. Increases in claim severity can arise from unexpected ev ents that are inherently difficult to predict, such as a change in the law.  Although we pursue various loss management initiatives to mitigate future increases in claim severity, there can be no assurances that these initiatives will successfully identify or reduce the effect of future increases in claim severity, and a significant increase in claim frequency could have an adverse effect on our operating results and financial condition.
The inability to obtain a financial strength rating from A.M. Best, or a downgrade in any such rating obtained, may have a material adverse effect on our competitive position, the marketability of our product offerings, and our liquidity, operating results and financial condition.
Financial strength ratings are important factors in establishing the competitive position of insurance companies and generally have an effect on an insurance company's business.  Many insurance buyers, agents and brokers use the ratings assigned by A.M. Best and other agencies to assist them in assessing the financial strength and overall quality of the companies from which they are considering purchasing insurance.  Since KICO became a stock property and casualty insurance company effective July 1, 2009, it has been seeking an A.M. Best rating. A. M. Best ratings are derived from an in-depth evaluation of an insurance company’s balance sheet strengths, operating performances and business profiles. A.M. Best evaluates, among other factors, the company’s capitalization, underwriting leverage, financial l everage, asset leverage, capital structure, quality and appropriateness of reinsurance, adequacy of reserves, quality and diversification of assets, liquidity, profitability, spread of risk, revenue composition, market position, management, market risk and event risk. On an ongoing basis, rating agencies such as A.M. Best review the financial performance and condition of insurers and can downgrade or change the outlook on an insurer's ratings due to, for example, a change in an insurer's statutory capital, a reduced confidence in management or a host of other considerations that may or may not be under the insurer's control.  We currently have a Demotech rating of A (Excellent), which qualifies our policies for banks and finance companies.  In the event we do not obtain a satisfactory A.M. Best rating, there will be a material adverse effect on our competitiveness, the marketability of our product offerings and our ability to grow in the marketplace.  Even if we obtain a satisfa ctory A.M. Best rating, because all ratings are subject to continuous review, the retention of these ratings cannot be assured.  A downgrade in any of these ratings could have similar effects.
36

Adverse capital and credit market conditions may significantly affect our ability to meet liquidity needs or our ability to obtain credit on acceptable terms.
The capital and credit markets have been experiencing extreme volatility and disruption. In some cases, the markets have exerted downward pressure on the availability of liquidity and credit capacity. In the event that we need access to additional capital to pay our operating expenses, make payments on our indebtedness, pay for capital expenditures or increase the amount of insurance that we seek to underwrite, our ability to obtain such capital may be limited and the cost of any such capital may be significant. Our access to additional financing will depend on a variety of factors, such as market conditions, the general availability of credit, the overall availability of credit to our industry, our credit ratings and credit capacity as well as lenders' perception of our long or short-term financial prospects. Similarly, our access to funds may be impaired if regulatory authorities or rating agencies take negative actions against us. If a combination of these factors occurs, our internal sources of liquidity may prove to be insufficient and, in such case, we may not be able to successfully obtain additional financing on favorable terms.
Reinsurance may be unavailable at current levels and prices, which may limit our ability to write new business.
Our personal lines catastrophe reinsurance program was designed, utilizing our risk management methodology, to address our exposure to catastrophes. Market conditions beyond our control impact the availability and cost of the reinsurance we purchase. No assurances can be made that reinsurance will remain continuously available to us to the same extent and on the same terms and rates as is currently available. For example, our ability to afford reinsurance to reduce our catastrophe risk may be dependent upon our ability to adjust premium rates for its cost, and there are no assurances that the terms and rates for our current reinsurance program will continue to be available in the future. If we are unable to maintain our current level of reinsurance or purchase new reinsurance protection in amounts that we consider sufficient and at pr ices that we consider acceptable, we will have to either accept an increase in our exposure risk, reduce our insurance writings or develop or seek other alternatives.
Reinsurance subjects us to the credit risk of our reinsurers, which may have a material adverse effect on our operating results and financial condition.
The collectability of reinsurance recoverables is subject to uncertainty arising from a number of factors, including changes in market conditions, whether insured losses meet the qualifying conditions of the reinsurance contract and whether reinsurers, or their affiliates, have the financial capacity and willingness to make payments under the terms of a reinsurance treaty or contract. Since we are primarily liable to an insured for the full amount of insurance coverage, our inability to collect a material recovery from a reinsurer could have a material adverse effect on our operating results and financial condition.
37

Applicable insurance laws regarding the change of control of our company may impede potential acquisitions that our stockholders might consider to be desirable.
We are subject to statutes and regulations of the state of New York which generally require that any person or entity desiring to acquire direct or indirect control of KICO, our insurance company subsidiary, obtain prior regulatory approval.  In addition, a change of control of Kingstone Companies, Inc. would require Insurance Department approval.  These laws may discourage potential acquisition proposals and may delay, deter or prevent a change of control of our company, including through transactions, and in particular unsolicited transactions, that some of our stockholders might consider to be desirable.
The insurance industry is subject to extensive restrictive regulation that may affect our operating costs and limit the growth of our business, and changes within this regulatory environment may, too, adversely affect our operating costs and limit the growth of our business.
We are subject to extensive laws and regulations.  State insurance regulators are charged with protecting policyholders and have broad regulatory, supervisory and administrative powers over our business practices, including, among other things, the power to grant and revoke licenses to transact business and the power to regulate and approve underwriting practices and rate changes, which may delay the implementation of premium rate changes or prevent us from making changes we believe are necessary to match rate to risk.  In addition, many states have laws and regulations that limit an insurer’s ability to cancel or not renew policies and that prohibit an insurer from withdrawing from one or more lines of business written in the state, except pursuant to a plan that is approved by the state insurance department .  Laws and regulations that limit cancellation and non-renewal and that subject program withdrawals to prior approval requirements may restrict our ability to exit unprofitable markets.
Because substantially allthe laws and regulations under which we operate are administered and enforced by a number of different governmental authorities, including state insurance regulators, state securities administrators and the SEC, each of which exercises a degree of interpretive latitude, we are subject to the risk that compliance with any particular regulator's or enforcement authority's interpretation of a legal issue may not result in compliance with another's interpretation of the same issue, particularly when compliance is judged in hindsight. In addition, there is risk that any particular regulator's or enforcement authority's interpretation of a legal issue may change over time to our detriment, or that changes in the overall legal and regulatory environment may, even absent any particular regulator's or enforcement authority's interpreta tion of a legal issue changing, cause us to change our views regarding the actions we need to take from a legal risk management perspective, thereby necessitating changes to our practices that may, in some cases, limit our ability to grow and improve the profitability of our business.
While the United States federal government does not directly regulate the insurance industry, federal legislation and administrative policies can affect us.  Congress and various federal agencies periodically discuss proposals that would provide for a federal charter for insurance companies. We cannot predict whether any such laws will be enacted or the effect that such laws would have on our business.  Moreover, there can be no assurance that changes will not be made to current laws, rules and regulations, or that any other laws, rules or regulations will not be adopted in the future, that could adversely affect our business and financial condition.
38

We may not be able to maintain the requisite amount of risk-based capital, which may adversely affect our profitability and our ability to compete in the property and casualty insurance markets.
The New York State Insurance Department imposes risk-based capital requirements on insurance companies to ensure that insurance companies maintain appropriate levels of surplus to support their overall business operations and to protect customers against adverse developments, after taking into account default, credit, underwriting and off-balance sheet risks.  If the amount of our capital falls below this minimum, we may face restrictions with respect to soliciting new business and/or keeping existing business.
Changing climate conditions may adversely affect our financial condition, profitability or cash flows.
We recognize the scientific view that the world is getting warmer. Climate change, to the extent it produces rising temperatures and changes in weather patterns, could impact the frequency or severity of weather events and wildfires and the affordability and availability of homeowners insurance.
Our operating results and financial condition may be adversely affected by the cyclical nature of the property and casualty business.
The property and casualty market is cyclical and has experienced periods characterized by relatively high levels of price competition, less restrictive underwriting standards and relatively low premium rates, followed by periods of relatively lower levels of competition, more selective underwriting standards and relatively high premium rates. A downturn in the profitability cycle of the property and casualty business could have a material adverse effect on our operating results and financial condition.
Because our operations are derived from sources located in New York, and Pennsylvania, our business may be adversely affected by conditions in these states.such state.
 
All of our revenue is derived from sources located in the statesstate of New York and Pennsylvania and, accordingly, is affected by the prevailing regulatory, economic, demographic, competitive and other conditions in these states.such state.  Changes in any of these conditions could make it more costly or difficult for us to conduct our business. Adverse regulatory developments in New York, or Pennsylvania, which could include fundamental changes to the design or implementation of the automobile insurance regulatory framework, could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and financial condition.
 
Actual claims incurred may exceed current reserves established for claims, which may adversely affect our operating results and financial condition.
Recorded claim reserves in our business are based on our best estimates of losses after considering known facts and interpretations of circumstances. Internal factors are considered, including actual claims paid, pending levels of unpaid claims, product mix and contractual terms. External factors are also considered, which include, but are not limited to, law changes, court decisions, changes in regulatory requirements and economic conditions. Because reserves are estimates of the unpaid portion of losses that have occurred, the establishment of appropriate reserves, including reserves for catastrophes, is an inherently uncertain and complex process. The ultimate cost of losses may vary materially from recorded reserves, and such variance may adversely affect our operating results and financial condition.
39
23

Regulation requiring us to underwrite business and participate in loss sharing arrangements may adversely affect our operating results and financial condition.
The state of New York has enacted laws that require a property-liability insurer conducting business in such state to participate in assigned risk plans, reinsurance facilities and joint underwriting associations or require the insurer to offer coverage to all consumers, often restricting an insurer's ability to charge the price it might otherwise charge. In these markets, we may be compelled to underwrite significant amounts of business at lower than desired rates, possibly leading to an unacceptable return on equity, which may adversely affect our operating results and financial condition.
Our future results are dependent in part on our ability to successfully operate in an insurance industry that is highly competitive.
The insurance industry is highly competitive.  Many of our competitors have well-established national reputations, substantially more capital and significantly greater marketing and management resources. Because of the competitive nature of the insurance industry, including competition for customers, agents and brokers, there can be no assurance that we will continue to effectively compete with our industry rivals, or that competitive pressures will not have a material adverse effect on our business, operating results or financial condition.
If we lose key personnel or are unable to recruit qualified personnel, our ability to implement our business strategies could be delayed or hindered.
 
Our future success will depend, in part, upon the efforts of Barry Goldstein, our President and Chief Executive Officer.Officer, and John Reiersen, President and Chief Executive Officer of KICO.  The loss of Mr.Messrs. Goldstein and/or Reiersen or other key personnel could prevent us from fully implementing our business strategies and could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.  We have an employment agreement with Mr. Goldstein that expires on June 30, 2009.  As we continue to grow, we will need to recruit and retain additional qualified management personnel, but we may not be able to do so.  Our ability to recruit and retain such personnel will depend upon a number of factors, such as our results of operations and prospects and the level of competition then prevailing in the market for qualified personnel.
 
If we obtain a controlling interest in Commercial Mutual Insurance Company, we will face new risks and uncertainties.
As discussed in Item 1 hereof, in March 2007, Commercial Mutual Insurance Company’s Board of Directors adopted a resolution to convert Commercial Mutual from an advance premium insurance company to a stock property and casualty insurance company.  We hold surplus notes of Commercial MutualDifficult conditions in the aggregate principal amount of $3,750,000.  Based upon the amount payable on the surplus notes and the statutory surplus of Commercial Mutual, the plan of conversion provides that, in the event of a conversion by Commercial Mutual into a stock corporation, in exchange for our relinquishing our rights to any unpaid principal and interest under the surplus notes, we would receive 100% of the stock of Commercial Mutual.  We have never operated as an insurance company and would face all of the risks and uncertainties that come with operating such a company, including underwriting risks.
As a holding company, we are dependent on the results of operations of our operating subsidiaries; there would be restrictions on the payment of dividends by Commercial Mutual.
We are a holding company and a legal entity separate and distinct from our operating subsidiaries. As a holding company without significant operations of our own, the principal sources of our funds are dividends and other payments from our operating subsidiaries.  Consequently, we must rely on our subsidiaries for our ability to repay debts, pay expenses and pay cash dividends to our shareholders.  In connection with the plan of conversion of Commercial Mutual, we have agreed with the New York State Insurance Department that, for a period of two years following the conversion, without the approval of the Insurance Department, no dividend may be paid by Commercial Mutual to us.
We have determined to discontinue our Retail Business operations prior to our obtaining a controlling interest in Commercial Mutual.
We have determined to close or sell our Retail Business locations and such operations are reflected as discontinued operations in our financial statements.  Such action has taken in anticipation of a change in business strategy from operating storefront insurance agencies to operating an insurance company through Commercial Mutual.  To date, the conditions to the conversion of Commercial Mutual to a stock property and casualty insurance company, namely the approval of the plan of conversion by the Insurance Department and Commercial Mutual’s policyholders, have not yet been satisfied.  No assurances can be given that the conversion will occur.
24
Reductions in the New York involuntary automobile insurance market may adversely affect our premium finance revenue.
Prior to the sale of our premium finance loan portfolio, our primary source of premium finance loans had been the assigned risk, or involuntary, automobile insurance market.  In New York, since mid-2003, there has been a significant decline in the number of new applications for coverage at the New York Auto Insurance Plan.  This has led to a reduction in the number of loans where policies of this type are the collateral. Beginning in 2004, we began to finance certain voluntary auto insurance policies.  We are now entitled to a placement fee based upon the amount of new premium finance loans made by the purchaser of our loan portfolio in the states of New York and Pennsylvania.  There is no guaranty that the number or size of the loans in the voluntary marketplace will offset the declines experienced in the involuntary market.
The volatility of premium pricing and commission rateseconomy generally could adversely affect our operations.business and operating results.
 
We currently derive revenue from commissions paid by insurance companies.  In addition, our franchisees relySome economists continue to project significant negative macroeconomic trends, including relatively high and sustained unemployment, reduced consumer spending, lower home prices, and substantial increases in delinquencies on such revenue.  The commission is usually a percentageconsumer debt, including defaults on home mortgages. Moreover, recent disruptions in the financial markets, particularly the reduced availability of credit and tightened lending requirements, have impacted the premium billedability of borrowers to an insured. Historically, property and casualty premiums have been cyclicalrefinance loans at more affordable rates. As with most businesses, we believe difficult conditions in nature and have displayed a high degree of volatility based on economic and competitive conditions.  Because such commission revenue is based on insurance premiums, a decline in premium levels willthe economy could have an adverse effect on our discontinuedbusiness and operating results.  General economic conditions also could adversely affect us in the form of consumer behavior, which may include decreased demand for our products.  As consumers become more cost conscio us, they may choose lower levels of insurance.
40

Changes in accounting standards issued by the Financial Accounting Standards Board or other standard-setting bodies may adversely affect our results of operations and our franchisees. In addition, in many cases, insurance companies may seek to reduce their expenses by reducing the commission rates payable to insurance agents or brokers and generally reserve the right to make such reductions.  We cannot predict the timing or extent of future changes in commission rates or premiums and therefore cannot predict the effect, if any, that such changes would have on our discontinued operations or our franchisees.financial condition.
 
WeOur financial statements are subject to regulation that may restrict our abilitythe application of generally accepted accounting principles, which are periodically revised, interpreted and/or expanded. Accordingly, we are required to earn profits.
Our premium finance subsidiary is subject to regulation and supervision by the financial institution departments in the states where it offers to finance premiums.  Certain regulatory restrictions, including restrictions on the maximum permissible rates of interest for premium financing, and prior approval requirements may affect its ability to place premium contracts and generate placement fees.
In addition, there are currently 33 DCAP franchises.  The offering of franchises is regulated by both the federal government and some states, including New York.
25
We may seek to expand through acquisitions of complementary businessesadopt new guidance or other assetsinterpretations, which involve additional risks that may adversely affect us.
We continually evaluate the possible expansion of our operations through the acquisition of businesses or other assets which we believe will complement or enhance our business.  We may also acquire or make investments in complementary businesses, products, services or technologies.  In the event we effect any such acquisition, we may not be able to successfully integrate any acquired business, asset, product, service or technology in our operations without substantial costs, delays or other problems or otherwise successfully expand our operations.  In addition, efforts expended in connection with such acquisitions may divert our management’s attention from other business concerns.  We also may have to borrow money to pay for future acquisitions and we may not be able to do so at all or on terms favorable to us. Additional borrowings and liabilities may have a materiallymaterial adverse effect on our liquidityresults of operations and capital resources.financial condition that is either unexpected or has a greater impact than expected.    
 
We rely on our information technology and telecommunication systems, and the failure of these systems could materially and adversely affect our business.business.
 
Our business is highly dependent upon the successful and uninterrupted functioning of our information technology and telecommunications systems.  We rely on these systems to support our operations.  The failure of these systems could interrupt our operations and result in a material adverse effect on our business.
 
We have incurred, and will continue to incur, increased costs as a result of being an SEC reporting company.
 
The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, as well as a variety of related rules implemented by the SEC, have required changes in corporate governance practices and generally increased the disclosure requirements of public companies.  As a reporting company, we incur significant legal, accounting and other expenses in connection with our public disclosure and other obligations.  Based upon SEC regulations currently in effect, we are required to establish, evaluate and report on our internal control over financial reporting and will be required to have our registered independent public accounting firm issue an attestation as to such reports commencing with our financial statements for the year ending December 31, 2009.2010.  We believe that, based upon SEC regulations currently in effect, our general and administrative expenses,ex penses, including amounts that will be spent on outside legal counsel, accountants and professionals and other professional assistance, will increase in 20092010 over 2008,2009, which could require us to allocate what may be limited cash resources away from our operations and business growth plans.  We also believe that compliance with the myriad of rules and regulations applicable to reporting companies and related compliance issues will divert time and attention of management away from operating and growing our business.
 
The enactment of tort reform could adversely affect our business.business.
 
Legislation concerning tort reform is from time to time considered in the United States Congress and in several states.Congress.  Among the provisions considered for inclusion in such legislation are limitations on damage awards, including punitive damages.  Enactment of these or similar provisions by Congress or by states in which we sell insurancethe state of New York could result in a reduction in the demand for liability insurance policies or a decrease in the limits of such policies, thereby reducing our revenues.  We cannot predict whether any such legislation will be enacted or, if enacted, the form such legislation will take, nor can we predict the effect, if any, such legislation would have on our business or results of operations.
 
41
26

ITEM 7A.
QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK.
 
Not applicable.
 
ITEM 8.                  FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA.
 
The financial statements required by this Item 87 are included in this Annual Report following Item 1514 hereof.  As a smaller reporting company, we are not required to provide supplementary financial information.
 
ITEM 9.
CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE.
 
There were no changes inOn November 19, 2009, we engaged Amper Politziner & Mattia (“Amper”) as our independent registered public accountants due to disagreementsaudit our consolidated financial statements as of December 31, 2009 and for the year then ended and to review our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2009.  Concurrently, we dismissed Holtz Rubenstein Reminick LLP (“Holtz”) as our independent registered public accountants.  Holtz had served as our independent auditors since 1990.  The Audit Committee of our Board of Directors (the “Audit Committee”) approved the engagement of Amper and the dismissal of Holtz.
In connection with our acquisition, effective July 1, 2009, of all of the outstanding stock of Commercial Mutual Insurance Company (now known as Kingstone Insurance Company) (“KICO”),  Amper audited the financial statements of KICO as of December 31, 2007 and 2008 and for the years then ended.  Effective July 1, 2009, substantially all of our continuing operations relate to KICO.
The report of Holtz on our consolidated financial statements as of December 31, 2008 and 2007 and for the fiscal years then ended did not contain an adverse opinion or disclaimer of opinion and was not qualified or modified as to uncertainty, audit scope, or accounting and financial disclosure duringprinciples.
During the twenty-four month periodfiscal years ended December 31, 2008.2007 and 2008 and the period from January 1, 2009 to November 19, 2009, (a) there were no disagreements with Holtz on any matter of accounting principles or practices, financial statement disclosure, or auditing scope or procedure which, if not resolved to the satisfaction of Holtz, would have caused Holtz to make reference thereto in its reports on the consolidated financial statements for such years; and (b) there were no reportable events as described in Item 304(a)(1)(v) of Regulation S-K promulgated by the Securities and Exchange Commission.
 
ITEM 9A.                      CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES.
 
Disclosure Controls and Procedures
 
We maintain disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(e)) that are designed to assure that information required to be disclosed in our Exchange Act reports is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to management, including our principal executive officerChief Executive Officer and principal financial officer,Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosures.
 
42

As required by Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(b), as of the end of the period covered by this Annual Report, under the supervision and with the participation of our principal executive officerChief Executive Officer and principal financial officer,Chief Financial Officer, we evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures.  Based on this evaluation, our principal executive officerChief Executive Officer and principal financial officerChief Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of that date.December 31, 2009.
 
Internal Control over Financial Reporting
 
Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting
 
Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Exchange Act. Internal control over financial reporting is a process designed by, or under the supervision of, our principal executive officerChief Executive Officer and principal financial officer,Chief Financial Officer, and effected by the board of directors, management, and other personnel, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with US GAAP including those policies and procedures that: (i) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of our assets, (ii) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with US GAAP and that receipts and expenditures are being made only in accordance with authorizations of our management and directors, and (iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of our assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.  
 
27
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with policies and procedures may deteriorate.  
 
Management conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting based on the framework in Internal Control – Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Based on this evaluation, management concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was not effective as of December 31, 2008.2009.
 
 A material weakness is a deficiency, or combination of deficiencies,Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
There was no change in our internal control over financial reporting suchduring our most recently completed fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting, except as described below.
As previously reported in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008, we determined that, as of that date, there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of our annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis. Management identified the followingwere material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2008:   
Information Technology Applications and Infrastructure
 We did not maintain effective controls over financial reporting relatedrelating to information technology applications and infrastructure. Specifically, the following deficiencies in the aggregate constituted a material weakness:
·  We did not maintain effective design of controls over access to financial reporting applications and data. Controls did not limit access to programs and data to only authorized users. In addition, controls lack the requirement of periodic reviews and monitoring of such access.
·  We did not maintain effective controls to communicate policies and procedures governing information technology security and access. Furthermore, we did not maintain effective logging and monitoring of servers and databases to ensure that access was both appropriate and authorized.
These deficiencies have had a pervasive impact on our information technology control environment. Additionally, these deficiencies could result in a misstatement of account balances or disclosure to substantially all accounts that could result in a material misstatement to the consolidated financial statements that would not be prevented or detected.
 
43
28

Remediation of Material Weaknesses
In January 2009, we effectively implemented controls to rectify the weaknesses discussed above. These controls have been tested by an independent consulting firm and, based on the favorable results, management believes that these issues have been successfully remediated.
 
This Annual Report doesOn July 1, 2009, we completed the acquisition of KICO. KICO has not includepreviously been subject to a review of internal control over financial reporting under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. We have begun the process of integrating KICO’s operations, including internal control over financial reporting, and extending our Section 404 compliance to KICO’s operations; however we have not yet made an attestation report of our independent registered public accounting firm regardingassessment with regard to KICO’s internal control over financial reporting. Management’s report was not subjectWe will be required to attestation byinclude KICO’s operations in our registered public accounting firm pursuant to temporary rulesassessment of the SEC that permit us to provide only management’s report in this Annual Report.
Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
There was no change in our internal control over financial reporting duringeffective June 30, 2010. KICO accounts for 97.2% of our most recently completed fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect,consolidated assets and contributes all of our internal control over financial reporting.consolidated net income.
 
ITEM 9B.                      OTHER INFORMATION.
 
None.Our Annual Meeting of Stockholders was held on December 18, 2009.  The following is a listing of the votes cast for or withheld with respect to each nominee for director:

1.           Election of Board of Directors
 
 Number of Shares
 For Withheld
   
Barry B. Goldstein2,316,42613,121
Michael R. Feinsod2,316,42613,121
Jay M. Haft2,316,42413,123
David A. Lyons2,316,82612,721
Jack D. Seibald2,316,42613,121


44

 
29

PART III

ITEM 10.
DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE.
 
Executive Officers and Directors
 
The following table sets forth the positions and offices presently held by each of our current directors and executive officers and their ages:
 
NameAgePositions and Offices Held
   
Barry B. Goldstein5657President, Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer, Treasurer and Director
Victor J. Brodsky52Chief Financial Officer and Secretary
John D. Reiersen67President, Kingstone Insurance Company
Michael R. Feinsod3839Director
Jay M. Haft7374Director
David A. Lyons5960Director
Jack D. Seibald4849Director

Barry B. Goldstein
 
Mr. Goldstein was elected our President, Chief Executive Officer, Chairman of the Board, and a director in March 2001 and our Treasurer in May 2001. He served as our Chief Financial Officer from March 2001 to November 2007.  Since January 2006, Mr. Goldstein has served as Chairman of the Board of Kingstone Insurance Company (“KICO”) (formerly known as Commercial Mutual Insurance Company,Company), a New York property and casualty insurer, as well as Chairman of its Executive Committee. In August 2008, Mr. Goldstein was appointed Chief Investment Officer of COMMERCIAL MUTUAL.KICO.  In March 2010, he was appointed Treasurer of KICO.  Effective July 1, 2009, we acquired a 100% equity interest in KICO.  From April 1997 to December 2004, he served as President of AIA Acquisition Corp., which operated insurance agenciesagen cies in Pennsylvania and which sold substantially all of its assets to us in May 2003. Mr. Goldstein received his B.A. and M.B.A. from State University of New York at Buffalo,Buffalo.  We believe that Mr. Goldstein’s extensive experience in the insurance industry, including his service as Chairman of the Board of KICO since 2006 and as its Chief Investment Officer since 2008, give him the qualifications and skills to serve as one of our directors.
Victor J. Brodsky
Mr. Brodsky has served as our Chief Financial Officer since August 2009 and as our Secretary since December 2008.  He served as our Chief Accounting Officer from August 2007 through July 2009 and as our Principal Financial Officer for Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) reporting purposes from November 2007 through July 2009.  In addition, Mr. Brodsky has been a certified public accountantdirector of KICO since 1979.February 2008. Effective July 1, 2009, we acquired a 100% equity interest in KICO.  Mr. Brodsky also served from May 2008 through March 15, 2010 as Vice President of Financial Reporting and Principal Financial Officer for SEC reporting purposes of Vertical Branding Inc. Mr. Brodsky served as Chief Financial Officer of Vertical Branding from March 1998 through May 2008 and as a director of Vertical Branding from May 2002 through November 2005. He served as its Secretary from November 2005 through May 2008 and from April 2009 to March 15, 2010.  A receiver was appointed for the business of Vertical Branding in February 2010. Prior to joining Vertical Branding, Mr. Brodsky spent 16 years at the CPA firm of Michael & Adest in New York. Mr. Brodsky earned a Bachelor of Business Administration degree from Hofstra University, with a major in accounting, and is a licensed CPA in New York.
45

John D. Reiersen
Mr. Reiersen has served as President of KICO since 1999 and as its Chief Executive Officer since 2001.  Effective July 1, 2009, we acquired a 100% equity interest in KICO.  Mr. Reiersen served for 25 years with the New York State Insurance Department ending his tenure there as Chief Examiner in the Property and Casualty Insurance Bureau. At the Insurance Department, he was instrumental in the enactment of numerous statutes and regulations, including the automobile no-fault program, the photo inspection law, the Insurance Information and Enforcement System program and many other cost-containment measures. Mr. Reiersen was also instrumental in the enactment of many rules in the New York Automobile Insurance Plan. He served as P resident of the Eagle Insurance Group from 1990 to 2000. Mr. Reiersen served as Chairman of the New York Insurance Association has served and continues to serve on many insurance industry association boards and committees. He holds the professional designations of Chartered Property and Casualty Underwriter, Certified Financial Examiner and Certified Insurance Examiner.  Mr. Reiersen is a graduate of Brooklyn College and holds a Bachelor of Science Degree in Accounting.
 
Michael R. Feinsod
Mr. Feinsod has been Chief Executive Officer of Ameritrans Capital Corporation, a closed-end investmentbusiness development company, since October 10, 2008. Mr. Feinsod has been President of Ameritrans Capital since November 2006 and also serves as its Chief Compliance Officer. He serves as Senior Vice President of Elk Associates Funding Corporation, a Small Business Investment Company and a subsidiary of Ameritrans Capital, and has served as a director of Ameritrans Capital and Elk Associates Funding Corporation since December 2005.  Since January 1999, Mr. Feinsod has been Managing Member of Infinity Capital, LLC, an investment management company.  He served as an investment analyst and portfolio manager at Mark Boyar & Company, Inc., a broker-dealer, from June 1997 to January 1999.  He is admitted to practice law in New YorkYo rk and served as an associate in the Corporate Law Department of Paul, Hastings, Janofsky & Walker LLP from 1996 to 1997. Mr. Feinsod holds a Juris Doctorate degreeJ.D. from Fordham University School of Law and a Bachelor of Arts degreeB.A. from George Washington University.
30
Jay M. Haft
Mr. Haft served as our Vice Chairman of the Board from February 1999 until March 2001. From October 1989 to February 1999, he served as our Chairman of the Board.  He has served as one of our directors since 1989.October 2008.  We believe that Mr. Haft has been engaged inFeinsod’s corporate finance, legal and executive-level experience, as well as his service on the practiceBoard of lawKICO since 1959July 2009, give him the qualifications and since 1994 has servedskills to serve as counsel to Parker Duryee Rosoff &one of our directors.
Jay M. Haft (and since December 2001, its successor, Reed Smith). From 1989 to 1994, he was a senior corporate partner of Parker Duryee.
Mr. Haft is currently a personal advisor to Victor Vekselberg, a Russian entrepreneur with considerable interests in oil, aluminum, utilities and other industries.  Mr. Haft is also a partner at Columbus Nova, the U.S.-based investment and operating arm of Mr. Vekselberg’s Renova Group of companies.  Mr. Haft is also a strategic and financial consultant for growth stage companies. He is active in international corporate finance and mergers and acquisitions. Mr. Haft also representsacquisitions as well as in the representation of emerging growth companies. He has actively participated in strategic planning and fund raising for many high-tech companies, leading edge medical technology companies and marketing companies.  Mr. Haft has extensive experience in the Russian market, where he has worked on growth strategies for companies looking to internationalize their business assets and enter international capital markets.  He has been a partner of Columbus Nova, a private investment firm, since 2000. He is afounder, consultant and/or director of a number ofnumerous public andan d private corporations, including DUSAand currently serves as Chairman of the Board of Dusa Pharmaceuticals, Inc., whose securities are traded on Nasdaq, andNasdaq.  Mr. Haft also serves on the Board of Ballantyne Cashmere, SpA, the United States-Russian Business Counsel.Counsel and The Link of Times Foundation and is an advisor to Montezemolo & Partners.  He has been instrumental in strategic planning and fundraising for a variety of Internet and high-tech, leading edge medical technology and marketing companies over the years.  Mr. Haft is counsel to Reed Smith, an international law firm, as well as several other law and accounting firms.  Mr. Haft is a past member of the Florida Commission for Government Accountability to the People, a past national trustee and Treasurer of the Miami City Ballet, and a past Board member of the Concert Association of Florida. He is also a past trustee of Florida International University Foundation and previously served on the advisory board of the Wolfsonian MuseumMus eum and Florida International University Law School. Mr. Haft served as our Vice Chairman of the Board from February 1999 until March 2001.  From October 1989 to February 1999, he served as our Chairman of the Board and he has served as one of our directors since 1989.  Mr. Haft received B.A. and LL.B. degrees from Yale University.  We believe that Mr. Haft’s corporate finance, business consultation, legal and executive-level experience, as well as his service on the Board of KICO since July 2009, give him the qualifications and skills to serve as one of our directors.
 
46

David A. Lyons
 
Mr. Lyons has served since 2004 as a principal of Den Ventures, LLC, a consulting firm focused on business, financing, and merger and acquisition strategies for public and private companies. From 2002 until 2004, Mr. Lyons served as a managing partner of the Nacio Investment Group, and President of Nacio Systems, Inc., a managed hosting company that provides outsourced infrastructure and communication services for mid-size businesses. Prior to forming the Nacio Investment Group, Mr. Lyons served as Vice President of Acquisitions for Expanets, Inc., a national provider of converged communications solutions. Previously, he was Chief Executive Officer of Amnex, Inc. and held various executive management positions at Walker Telephone Systems, Inc. and Inter-tel, Inc.  HeMr. Lyons has served as one of our directors since July 2005.   We believe that Mr. Lyons’ executive-level experience, as well as his experience in the areas of business consultation, corporate finance and mergers and acquisitions, and his service on the Board of KICO since July 2009, give him the qualifications and skills to serve as one of our directors.
 
Jack D. Seibald
 
Mr. Seibald is a Managing Director of Concept Capital, a division of SMH Capital, Inc., a broker-dealer. Mr. Seibald has been affiliated with SMH Capital, Inc. and its predecessor firms since 1995 and is a registered representative with extensive experience in equity research and investment management dating back to 1983. Since 1997, Mr. Seibald has also been a Managing Member of Whiteford Advisors, LLC, an investment management firm. He began his career at Oppenheimer & Co. and has also been affiliated with Salomon Brothers, Morgan Stanley & Co. and Blackford Securities. Mr. Seibald is a member of the Board of Directors of Commercial Mutual Insurance Company, a New York property and casualty insurer, and serves as Chairman of its Investments Committee. He holds an M.B.A. from Hofstra University and a B.A. from George Washington University. HeMr. Seibald has served as one of our directors since 2004.  We believe that Mr. Seibald’s corporate finance and executive-level experience, as well as his service on the Board of KICO since 2006 (including his service as Chairman of its Investments Committee), give him the qualifications and skills to serve as one of our directors.
 
47
31

Family Relationships
 
There are no family relationships among any of our executive officers and directors.
 
Term of Office
 
Each director will hold office until the next annual meeting of stockholders and until his successor is elected and qualified or until his earlier resignation or removal.  Each executive officer will hold office until the initial meeting of the Board of Directors following the next annual meeting of stockholders and until his successor is elected and qualified or until his earlier resignation or removal.
 
Audit Committee
 
The Audit Committee of the Board of Directors is responsible for overseeing our accounting and financial reporting processes and the audits of our financial statements.  The members of the Audit Committee are Messrs. Lyons, Haft and Seibald.
 
Audit Committee Financial Expert
 
Our Board of Directors has determined that Mr. Lyons is an “audit committee financial expert,” as that is defined in Item 401(e)(2)407(d)(5) of Regulation S-B.S-K  Mr. Lyons is an “independent director” based on the definition of independence in Rule 4200(a)(15) of the listing standards of The Nasdaq Stock Market.
 
Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance
 
Section 16 of the Exchange Act requires that reports of beneficial ownership of common shares and changes in such ownership be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission by Section 16 “reporting persons,” including directors, certain officers, holders of more than 10% of the outstanding common shares and certain trusts of which reporting persons are trustees.  We are required to disclose in this Annual Report each reporting person whom we know to have failed to file any required reports under Section 16 on a timely basis during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008.2009.  To our knowledge, based solely on a review of copies of Forms 3, 4 and 5 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and written representations that no other reports were required, during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008,2 009, our officers, directors and 10% stockholders complied with all Section 16(a) filing requirements applicable to them, except that Mr. HaftReiersen filed ahis Form 43 one day late on two occasions and each of Messrs. LyonsHaft and Seibald, and Morton L. Certilman,AIA Acquisition Corp., a former director,10% stockholder, filed a Form 4 late on one occasion.  Each filing reported one transaction.
 
Code of Ethics for Senior Financial Officers
 
Our Board of Directors has adopted a Code of Ethics for our principal executive officer, principal financial officer, principal accounting officer or controller, or persons performing similar functions.  A copy of the Code of Ethics is posted on our website, www.dcapgroup.com.www.kingstonecompanies.com.  We intend to satisfy the disclosure requirement under Item 105.05(c) of Form 8-K regarding an amendment to, or a waiver from, our Code of Ethics by posting such information on our website, www.dcapgroup.com.www.kingstonecompanies.com.
 
48
32

ITEM 11.                      EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION.
 
Summary Compensation Table
 
The following table sets forth certain information concerning the compensation for the fiscal years ended December 31, 20082009 and 20072008 for certain executive officers, including our Chief Executive Officer:
 
 
Name and
Principal Position
 
 
Year
 
 
Salary
 
 
Bonus
 
Option
Awards
All Other
Compensation
 
 
Total
       
Barry B. Goldstein
    Chief Executive Officer
2009$275,000$8,658(2)-$14,400$298,058
2008$275,000--$15,770$290,770
       
Victor J. Brodsky
    Chief Financial Officer
2009$208,533-$37,865-$246,398
      
       
John D. Reiersen
    President, Kingstone
    Insurance Company
2009$171,000(1)$19,612(2)$40,230-$230,842
      
 
Name and
Principal Position
 
 
Year
 
 
Salary
 
Option
Awards
All Other
Compensation
 
 
Total
    
 
Country Club Dues
 
Other
 
Barry B. Goldstein
    Chief Executive Officer
2008$275,000--$15,770$290,770
2007$350,000$148,070$21,085$15,770$534,925
       
Curt Hapward (1)    
    President, DCAP Management Corp.
2008$115,107--$6,000$121,107
2007$82,374$84,122-$4,430$170,926
__________
___________
(1)  Represents salary paid by Kingstone Insurance Company (“KICO”) (formerly Commercial Mutual Insurance Company) from July 1, 2009 to December 31, 2009.  Effective July 1, 2009, we acquired 100% of the stock of KICO.

(1)  Mr. Hapward served as President of our subsidiary, DCAP Management Corp., until July 3, 2008.
(2)Represents portion of bonus paid by KICO that is allocable to the period from July 1, 2009 to December 31, 2009.

Employment Contracts
 
Mr. Goldstein is employed as our President, Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer pursuant to an employment agreement, dated October 16, 2007, as amended (the “Employment“Goldstein Employment Agreement”), that expires on June 30, 2009. The Employment Agreement will automatically renew for a one-year term if Mr. Goldstein is in our employ on June 30, 2009.December 31, 2014. Pursuant to the Goldstein Employment Agreement, effective January 1, 2010, Mr. Goldstein is entitled to receive an annual base salary of $350,000 (which base salary has been in effect since January 1, 2004)$375,000 (“Base Salary”) and annual bonuses based on our net income.income (which bonus, commencing for 2010, may not be less than $10,000 per annum).  Mr. Goldstein’s annual base salary had been $350,000 from January 1, 2004 through December 31, 2009.  On August 25, 2008, we and Mr. Goldstein entered into an amendment (the “Amendment”“2008 Amendment”) to the Goldstein Employment Agreement. The 2008 Amendment entitles Mr.Mr . Goldstein to devote upcertain time to 750 hours per year,Kingstone Insurance Company) (“KICO”) (formerly known as currently provided for in an employment contract with Commercial Mutual Insurance Company) to fulfill his duties and responsibilities as Chairman of the Board and Chief Investment Officer of Commercial Mutual.KICO. Such permitted activity is subject to a reduction in Base Salary under the Goldstein Employment Agreement on a dollar-for-dollar basis to the extent of the salary payable by Commercial MutualKICO to Mr. Goldstein pursuant to the Commercial Mutualhis KICO employment contract, which, effective July 1, 2009, is currently $150,000$157,500 per year.  Commercial MutualKICO is a New York property and casualty insurer.  Effective July 1, 2009, we acquired 100% of the stock of KICO.  Pursuant to an amendment entered into with Mr. Goldstein as of March 24, 2010 (the “2010 Amendment”), in addition to the increase in his Base Salary to $375,000 and minimum $10,000 annual bonus, as noted above, the expiration date of the agreement was extended from June 30, 2010 to December 31, 2014, we issued to Mr. Golds tein 50,000 shares of common stock and we granted to him a five year option for the purchase of 188,865 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $2.50 per share, exercisable to the extent of 25% on the date of grant and each of the initial three anniversary dates of the grant.  In connection with the stock option grant, we increased the number of shares authorized to be issued pursuant to our 2005 Equity Participation Plan from 300,000 to 550,000, subject to shareholder approval.  Pursuant to the 2010 Amendment, we also agreed that, under certain circumstances following a change of control of Kingstone Companies, Inc. and the termination of his employment, all of Mr. Goldstein’s outstanding options would become exercisable and would remain exercisable until the first anniversary of the termination date.


49
 
33

 
Mr. Reiersen is employed as President and Chief Executive Officer of KICO pursuant to an employment agreement, dated September 13, 2006, as amended (the “Reiersen Employment Agreement”), that expires on December 31, 2011.  Pursuant to the Reiersen Employment Agreement, Mr. Reiersen is currently entitled to receive an annual base salary of approximately $257,000.  Effective January 1, 2011, Mr. Reiersen’s annual base salary is scheduled to increase to approximately $269,000.

OUTSTANDING EQUITY AWARDS AT FISCAL YEAR-END

 
 
Name
Option Awards
Number of Securities Underlying
Unexercised Options
Number of Securities Underlying
Unexercised Options
Option Exercise
Price
 
Option Expiration Date
 ExercisableUnexercisable  
     
Barry B. Goldstein97,50032,500(1)$2.0610/16/12
Victor J. Brodsky5,00015,000(2)$2.3507/30/14
John D. Reiersen-20,000(3)$2.3507/30/14
  
Option Awards
 
 
 
Name
 
Number of Securities Underlying
Unexercised Options
  
Number of Securities Underlying
Unexercised Options
  
Option Exercise
Price
 
Option Expiration Date
  Exercisable  Unexercisable     
           
Barry B. Goldstein  65,000   65,000(1) $2.06 10/16/12
Curt Hapward  -   -   - -
_____________________________
 
(1) Such options are exercisable as of October 16, 2010.
(2) Such options are exercisable to the extent of 32,5005,000 shares effective as of October 16, 2009July 30, 2010, July 30, 2011 and 2010.July 30, 2012.
(3) Such options are exercisable to the extent 5,000 shares effective as of July 30, 2010, July 30, 2011, July 30, 2012 and July 30, 2013.
 
Termination of Employment and Change-in-Control Arrangements
 
Pursuant to the Goldstein Employment Agreement with Mr. Goldstein and as provided for in his prior employment agreement which expired on April 1, 2007, Mr. Goldstein would be entitled, under certain circumstances, to a payment equal to one and one-half times his then annual salary in the event of the termination of his employment following a change of control of DCAP.Kingstone Companies, Inc.  Under such circumstances, Mr. Goldstein’s outstanding options would become exercisable and would remain exercisable until the first anniversary of the termination date.  In addition, in the event Mr. Goldstein’s employment is terminated by usKingstone Companies, Inc. without cause or he resigns with good reason (each as defined in the Goldstein Employment Agreement), Mr. Goldstein willwould be entitled to receive his base salary and bonuses fr om Kingstone Companies, Inc. for the remainder of the term.term, and his outstanding options would become exercisable and would remain exercisable until the first anniversary of the termination date.  In addition, in the event Mr. Goldstein’s employment with KICO is terminated by KICO with or without cause, he would be entitled to receive a lump sum payment from KICO equal to six months base salary.
 
50

Pursuant to the Reiersen Employment Agreement, Mr. Reiersen is entitled to a severance payment from KICO equal to one-half of his then annual salary.
Compensation of Directors
 
The following table sets forth certain information concerning the compensation of our directors for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008:2009:
 
DIRECTOR COMPENSATION
 
Name
Fees Earned or
Paid in Cash
 
Stock Awards
Option AwardsTotal
Fees Earned or
Paid in Cash
 
Stock Awards
Option AwardsTotal
    
Morton L. Certilman(1)$4,271$10,125-$14,396
        
Michael R. Feinsod$2,822--$2,822$9,425$9,458-$18,883
        
Jay M. Haft$4,475$7,500-$11,975$7,250$7,394-$14,644
        
David A. Lyons$5,725$10,125-(2)$15,850$9,925$9,658-(1)$19,583
        
Jack D. Seibald$6,225$12,750-$18,975$12,225$11,923-$24,148
_______________
 
(1)  Mr. Certilman retired as a director effective December 5, 2008.
34
(2)  As of December 31, 2008,2009, Mr. Lyons held options for the purchase of 20,000 common shares.
 
Our non-employee directors are entitled to receive compensation for their services as directors as follows:
 
·$8,33315,000 per annum (1)
·up to additional $3,500$5,000 per annum for committee chair (1)(2)
·$350 per Board meeting attended ($175 if telephonic)
·$200 per committee meeting attended ($100 if telephonic)
_______________

(1)           One-half payable in stock; otherPayable one-half payable in stock or, at the director’s option,and one-half in cash.

51

ITEM 12.
SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS.
 
Security Ownership
 
The following table sets forth certain information as of March 31, 200925, 2010 regarding the beneficial ownership of our common shares by (i) each person who we believe to be the beneficial owner of more than 5% of our outstanding common shares, (ii) each present director, (iii) each person listed in the Summary Compensation Table under “Executive Compensation,” and (iv) all of our present executive officers and directors as a group.
 
Name and Address
of Beneficial Owner
Number of Shares
Beneficially Owned
Approximate
Percent of Class
   
Barry B. Goldstein
11581154 Broadway
Hewlett, New York
 763,078880,756
(1)(2)
25.1 %27.7%
   
Michael R. Feinsod
InfinityAmeritrans Capital Partners, L.P.Corporation
767747 Third Avenue, 16th FloorSuite 4C
New York, New York
 487,495496,373
(1)(3)
16.4%16.3%
   
AIA Acquisition Corp
6787 Market Street
Upper Darby, Pennsylvania
 361,600439,600
(4)
11.0%12.8%
   
Jack D. Seibald  
1336 Boxwood Drive West
Hewlett Harbor, New York
 238,065387,184
(1)(5)
8.0%12.7%

35
Morton L. Certilman
90 Merrick Avenue
East Meadow, New York
 179,829
(1)
6.0%5.9%
   
Jay M. Haft
69 Beaver Dam Road
Salisbury, Connecticut
 165,797168,832
(1)(6)
5.6%
   
David A. Lyons
252 Brookdale Road
Stamford, Connecticut
 29,58133,543
(7)
1.0%1.1%
Victor J. Brodsky
1154 Broadway
Hewlett, New York
 5,000
 (8)
*
52

John D. Reiersen
15 Joys Lane
Kingston, New York
 4,600*
   
All executive officers
and directors as a group
(57 persons)
 1,684,0161,976,288
(1)(2)(3)(5)(6)(7)(8)
55.1%61.6%
__________
__________
*         Less than 1%.

(1)Based upon Schedule 13D filed under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and other information that is publicly available.
  
(2)Includes (i) 8,500 shares held by Mr. Goldstein’s children, (ii) 11,900 shares held in a retirement trust for the benefit of Mr. Goldstein and (iii) 65,000(ii) 144,716 shares issuable upon the exercise of options that are currently exercisable.  Excludes (i) the shares beneficially owned by AIA Acquisition Corp. (“AIA ”)AIA”) of which members of Mr. Goldstein’s family are principal stockholders.stockholders and (ii) 57,692 shares issuable to a limited liability company of which Mr. Goldstein is a minority member upon the conversion of preferred shares that are currently convertible.  Mr. Goldstein disclaims beneficial ownership of the shares held by his children and retirement trust and the shares owned by AIA.AIA or issuable to such limited liability company.
  
(3)Shares areIncludes 487,495 shares owned by Infinity Capital Partners, L.P. (“Partners”). Each of (i) Infinity Capital, LLC (“Capital”), as the general partner of Partners, (ii) Infinity Management, LLC (“Management”), as the Investment Manager of Partners, and (iii) Michael Feinsod, as the Managing Member of Capital and Management, the General Partner and Investment Manager, respectively, of Partners, may be deemed to be the beneficial owners of the shares held by Partners. Pursuant to the Schedule 13D filed under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, by Partners, Capital, Management and Mr. Feinsod, each has sole voting and dispositive power over the shares.
  
(4)Based upon Schedule 13G filed under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and other information that is publicly available. Includes 312,000390,000 shares issuable upon the conversion of preferred shares that are currently convertible.
  
(5)
Includes (i) 113,000 shares owned jointly by Mr. Seibald and his wife, Stephanie Seibald; (ii) 100,000 shares owned by SDS Partners I, Ltd., a limited partnership (“SDS”); (iii) 3,000 shares owned by Boxwood FLTD Partners, a limited partnership (“Boxwood”); (iv) 3,000 shares owned by Stewart Spector IRA (“S. Spector”); (v) 3,000 shares owned by Barbara Spector IRA Rollover (“B. Spector”); and (vi) 4,000 shares owned by Karen Dubrowsky IRA (“Dubrowsky”).; and (vii) 144,230 shares issuable to a retirement trust for the benefit of Mr. Seibald upon the conversion of preferred shares that are currently convertible. Mr. Seibald has voting and dispositive power over the shares owned by SDS, Boxwood, S. Spector, B. Spector and Dubrowsky.Dub rowsky and issuable to the retirement trust.
36
  
(6)Includes 3,076 shares held in a retirement trust for the benefit of Mr. Haft.
  
(7)Includes 20,000 shares issuable upon the exercise of currently exercisable options.
53

  
(8)Represents shares issuable upon the exercise of currently exercisable options.

Securities Authorized for Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans
 
The following table sets forth information as of December 31, 20082009 with respect to compensation plans (including individual compensation arrangements) under which our common shares are authorized for issuance, aggregated as follows:
 
·  All compensation plans previously approved by security holders; and
·  All compensation plans not previously approved by security holders.

EQUITY COMPENSATION PLAN INFORMATION
 
Number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options, warrants and rights
(a)
Weighted average exercise price of outstanding options, warrants and rights
(b)
Number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans (excluding securities reflected in column (a))
(c)
Number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options, warrants and rights
(a)
Weighted average exercise price of outstanding options, warrants and rights
(b)
Number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans (excluding securities reflected in column (a))
(c)
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders177,400$2.40367,724225,000$2.2472,500
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders
         -0-
        -0-         -0--0--0--0-
Total177,400$2.40367,724225,000$2.2472,500
 
ITEM 13.
CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE.
 
2003 Debt Financing
 
Effective In July 10, 2003, in order to fund our premium finance operations, we obtained $3,500,000 from a private placement of debt. The debt was initially repayable on January 10, 2006 and providesprovided for interest at the rate of 12.625% per annum, payable semi-annually.  We havehad the right to prepay the debt. During 2005, we utilized our bank line of credit then in effect to repay $2,000,000 of the debt.
 
 In consideration of the debt financing, we issued to the lenders warrants for the purchase of an aggregate of 105,000 of our common shares at an exercise price of $6.25 per share. The warrants were initially scheduled to expire on January 10, 2006. EffectiveIn May 25, 2005, the holders of the remaining $1,500,000 of debt agreed to extend the maturity date of the debt to September 30, 2007. The debt extension was given to satisfy a requirement of a lender that arose in connection with a December 2004 increase in the lender’s revolving line of credit and an extension of the line to June 30, 2007. In consideration for the extension of the due date for the debt, we extended the expiration date of warrants held by the debtholders for the purchase of 97,500 common shares to September 30, 2007. Between March 2007 and September 2007, the holdersholde rs of the outstanding debt agreed to a further extension of the due date to September 30, 2008. In consideration for such further extension, we further extended the expiration date of the warrants held by the debtholders to September 30, 2008.
 
54
37

In August 2008, the maturity date was further extended from September 30, 2008 to July 10, 2009 (or earlier if certain conditions arewere met). In exchange for this extension, the holders willwere entitled to receive an aggregate incentive payment equal to $10,000 times the number of months (or partial months) the debt iswas outstanding after September 30, 2008 through the maturity date. If a prepayment of principal reducesreduced the debt below $1,500,000, the incentive payment for all subsequent months willwas to be reduced in proportion to any such reduction to the debt. The aggregate incentive payment iswas due upon full repayment of the debt.
 
One of the private placement lenders was a retirement trust established for the benefit of Jack D. Seibald (the “Seibald Retirement Trust”) which loaned us $625,000 and was issued a warrant for the purchase of 18,750 of our common shares. Mr. Seibald is one of our principal stockholders and, effective September 2004, became one of our directors.  Mr. Seibald’s retirement trust currently holdsAs of May 2009, the Seibald Retirement Trust held approximately $288,000 of the debt.
 
In September 2007, a limited liability company of which Mr. Goldstein is a minority member purchased from a debtholder a note in the approximate principal amount of $115,000 and a warrant for the purchase of 7,500 shares.  In connection with the purchase, the maturity date of the debt and the expiration date of the warrant were extended as discussed above.
 
The warrants expired on September 30, 2008.
 
In May 2009, three of the holders of the debt exchanged an aggregate of approximately $519,000 of note principal for Series E preferred shares having an aggregate redemption amount equal to such aggregate principal amount of notes.  The Series E preferred shares have rights and preferences as discussed below under “Exchange of Preferred Stock”. Concurrently, we paid approximately $50,000 to the three holders, which amount represented all accrued and unpaid interest and incentive payments through the date of exchange.  As part of the transaction, the Seibald Retirement Trust exchanged its note in the approximate principal amount of $288,000 for Series E preferred shares.  In addition, the limited liability company of which Mr. Goldstein is a minority member exchanged its note in the approximate principal amount of $115,000 for Series E preferred shares.
In May 2009, we prepaid approximately $687,000 in principal of the debt to the remaining five holders, together with approximately $81,000, which amount represented accrued and unpaid interest and incentive payments on such prepayment.
In June 2009, we prepaid the remaining approximately $294,000 in principal of the debt to such remaining holders, together with approximately $19,000, which amount represented accrued and unpaid interest and incentive payments on such prepayment.
Kingstone Insurance Company (formerly known as Commercial Mutual Insurance CompanyCompany)
 
On January 31, 2006, we purchased two surplus notes in the aggregate principal amount of $3,750,000 issued by Commercial Mutual Insurance Company.Company (“Commercial Mutual”).  Commercial Mutual (now renamed Kingstone Insurance Company) is a New York property and casualty insurer.
 
55

Concurrently with the purchase, the new Commercial Mutual Board of Directors elected BarryMr. Goldstein our President,as its Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer, as its Chairman.Board. Mr. Goldstein had been elected as a director of Commercial Mutual in December 2005.  Subsequently, Mr. Goldstein was elected Chairman of Commercial Mutual’s Executive Committee and its Chief Investment Officer.  Mr. Seibald and Victor Brodsky, our then Chief Accounting Officer and currently our Chief Financial Officer, also were elected as directors of Commercial Mutual.
 
In March 2007, Commercial Mutual’sthe Board of Directors adoptedof Commercial Mutual approved a resolution to convert Commercial Mutual from an advance premium cooperative insurance company to a stock property and casualty insurance company.company pursuant to Section 7307 of the New York Insurance Law.
As of June 30, 2009, we held two surplus notes issued by Commercial Mutual has advised us that it has obtained permission fromin the aggregate principal amount of $3,750,000.  Previously earned but unpaid interest on the notes as of June 30, 2009 was approximately $2,246,000.  The surplus notes were past due and provided for interest at the prime rate or 8.5% per annum, whichever is less.  Payments of principal and interest on the surplus notes could only be made out of the surplus of Commercial Mutual and required the approval of the Insurance Department of the State of New York (the “Insurance Department”).  As of June 30, 2009, the statutory surplus of Commercial Mutual, as reported to the Insurance Department, was approximately $7,884,000.
The conversion by Commercial Mutual to a stock property and casualty insurance company was subject to a number of conditions, including the approval by the Superintendent of Insurance of the State of New York (the “Superintendent of Insurance”) to proceed with the conversion process (subject to certain conditions as discussed below).
38
The conversion by Commercial Mutual to a stock property and casualty insurance company is subject to a number of conditions, including the approval of the plan of conversion, which was filed with the Superintendent of Insurance onin April 25, 2008, by both the2008. The Superintendent of Insurance approved the plan of conversion in April 2009. The plan of conversion was approved by the required two-thirds of all votes cast by eligible Commercial Mutual policyholders at a special meeting of policyholders held in June 2009.
Effective July 1, 2009, Commercial Mutual completed its conversion from an advance premium cooperative to a stock property and casualty insurance company. Upon the effectiveness of the conversion, Commercial Mutual’s policyholders.  As partname was changed to Kingstone Insurance Company (“KICO”). Pursuant to the plan of conversion, we acquired a 100% equity interest in KICO in consideration of the approval process, the Superintendentexchange of Insurance had an appraisal performed with respect to the fair market valueour $3,750,000 principal amount of surplus notes of Commercial Mutual as of December 31, 2006.Mutual.  In addition, the Insurance Department conducted a five year examinationwe forgave all accrued and unpaid interest of Commercial Mutual as of December 31, 2006. We, as the holder of the Commercial Mutual surplus notes, at our option, would be able to exchange the surplus notes for an equitable share of the securities or other consideration, or both, of the corporation into which Commercial Mutual would be converted.  Based upon the amount payable$2,246,000 on the surplus notes and the statutory surplus of Commercial Mutual, the plan of conversion provides that, in the event of a conversion by Commercial Mutual into a stock corporation, in exchange for our relinquishing our rights to any unpaid principal and interest under the surplus notes, we would receive 100%as of the stockdate of Commercial Mutual.  No assurances can be given that the conversion will occur or as to the timing or terms of the conversion.
 
Exchange of Preferred Stock
AIA
 
Effective March 23, 2007, the outside mandatory redemption date for the preferred shares held by AIA Acquisition Corp. (“AIA”) was extended from April 30, 2007 to April 30, 2008 through the issuance of Series B preferred shares in exchange for an equal number of Series A preferred shares held by AIA.
 
Effective April 16, 2008, the outside mandatory redemption date for the preferred shares held by AIA was further extended to April 30, 2009 through the issuance of Series C preferred shares in exchange for an equal number of Series B preferred shares held by AIA.  In addition, the Series C preferred shares provideprovided for dividends at the rate of 10% per annum (as compared to 5% per annum for the Series B preferred shares).
 
56

Effective August 23, 2008, the outside mandatory redemption date for the preferred shares held by AIA was further extended to July 31, 2009 through the issuance of Series D preferred shares in exchange for an equal number of Series C preferred shares held by AIA.
 
Effective May 12, 2009, the outside mandatory redemption date for the preferred shares held by AIA was further extended to July 31, 2011 through the issuance of Series E preferred shares in exchange for an equal number of Series D preferred shares held by AIA.  In addition, the Series E preferred shares provide for dividends at the rate of 11.5% per annum (as compared to 10% per annum for the Series D preferred shares) and a conversion price of $2.00 per share (as compared to $2.50 per share for the Series D preferred shares).  Further, the two series differ in that our obligation to redeem the Series E preferred shares is not accelerated based upon a sale of substantially all of our assets or certain of our subsidiaries (as compared to the Series D preferred shares which provided for such acceleration) and our obl igation to redeem the Series E preferred shares is not secured by the pledge of the outstanding stock of our subsidiary, AIA-DCAP Corp. (as compared to the Series D preferred shares which provided for such pledge).
The current aggregate redemption amount for the Series DE preferred shares held by AIA is $780,000, plus accumulated and unpaid dividends. TheAs indicated above, the Series DE preferred shares are convertible into our common shares at a price of $2.50$2.00 per share. Members of theMr. Goldstein’s family of Barry Goldstein, our Chief Executive Officer, are principal stockholders of AIA.
 
Other
Reference is made to “2003 Debt Financing” for a discussion of an issuance in May 2009 of Series E preferred shares in exchange for promissory notes held by the Seibald Retirement Trust and the limited liability company of which Mr. Goldstein is a minority member.
Sale of Franchise Operations
In May 2009, we sold all of the outstanding stock of the subsidiaries that operated our DCAP franchise business to Stuart Greenvald and Abraham Weinzimer.  The purchase price for the stock was $200,000 which was paid by delivery of a promissory note in such principal amount (the “Franchise Note”).  The Franchise Note is payable to the extent of $50,000 on May 15, 2009 (which has been paid), $50,000 on May 1, 2010 and $100,000 on May 1, 2011 and provides for interest at the rate of 5.25% per annum.  Mr. Greenvald is the son-in-law of Morton L. Certilman, one of our principal shareholders.
 2009 Debt Financing
From June 2009 through December 2009, we borrowed an aggregate $1,050,000 and issued promissory notes in such aggregate principal amount (the “2009 Notes”).  The 2009 Notes provide for interest at the rate of 12.625% per annum and are payable on July 10, 2011. The 2009 Notes are prepayable by us without premium or penalty; provided, however, that, under any circumstances, the holders of the 2009 Notes are entitled to receive an aggregate of six months interest from the issue date of the 2009 Notes with respect to the amount prepaid.
A limited liability company owned by Mr. Goldstein, along with Sam Yedid and Steven Shapiro (who are both directors of KICO), purchased a 2009 Note in the principal amount of $120,000. Jay M. Haft, one of our principal stockholders and directors, purchased a 2009 Note in the principal amount of $50,000. A member of the family of Michael Feinsod, one of our principal stockholders and directors, purchased a 2009 Note in the principal amount of $100,000. Mr. Yedid and members of his family purchased 2009 Notes in the aggregate principal amount of $220,000. A member of the family of Floyd Tupper, a director of KICO, purchased a 2009 Note in the principal amount of $70,000. Between January 2010 and March 2010, we borrowed an additional $400,000 under the same terms as provided for in the 2009 Notes, of which $150,000 was borrowed from Mr. Goldstein’s retirement account.
57

Relationship
 
Certilman Balin Adler & Hyman, LLP, a law firm with which Morton L. Certilman, a principal stockholder, is affiliated, serves as our counsel.  It is presently anticipated that such firm will continue to represent us and will receive fees for its services at rates and in amounts not greater than would be paid to unrelated law firms performing similar services.
 
39
Director Independence
 
Board of Directors
 
Our Board of Directors is currently comprised of Barry B. Goldstein, Michael R. Feinsod, Jay M. Haft, David A. Lyons and Jack D. Seibald.  Each of Messrs. Feinsod, Haft, Lyons and Seibald is currently an “independent director” based on the definition of independence in Rule 4200(a)(15) of the listing standards at The Nasdaq Stock Market.
 
Audit Committee
 
The members of our Board’s Audit Committee currently are Messrs. Lyons, Haft and Seibald, each of whom is an “independent director” based on the definition of independence in Rule 4200(a)(15) of the listing standards of The Nasdaq Stock Market and Rule 10A-3(b)(1) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
 
Nominating Committee
 
The members of our Board’s Nominating Committee currently are Messrs. Feinsod, Haft, Lyons and Seibald, each of whom is an “independent director” based on the definition of independence in Rule 4200(a)(15) of the listing standards of The Nasdaq Stock Market.
 
Compensation Committee
 
The members of our Board’s Compensation Committee currently are Messrs. Seibald, Haft and Lyons, each of whom is an “independent director” based on the definition of independence in Rule 4200(a)(15) of the listing standards of The Nasdaq Stock Market.
 
ITEM 14.
PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES.
 
The following is a summary of the fees billed to us by Amper Politziner & Mattia, LLP, our independent auditors, for professional services rendered for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009 and by Holtz Rubenstein Reminick LLP, our former independent auditors, for professional services rendered for the fiscal years ended December 31, 20082009 and December 31, 2007:2008:
 
58

Fee Category Fiscal 2008 Fees  Fiscal 2007 Fees 
 Audit Fees(1) $110,000  $116,000 
 Audit-Related Fees(2)  -   - 
 Tax Fees(3)  47,600   28,000 
 All Other Fees(4)   8,910   8,419 
 Total Fees $166,510  $152,419 
Fee Category Fiscal 2009 Fees  Fiscal 2008 Fees 
 Audit Fees(1) $165,650  $110,000 
 Audit-Related Fees(2)  -   - 
 Tax Fees(3)  32,720   47,600 
 All Other Fees(4)  110,316   8,910 
 Total Fees $308,686  $166,510 
__________
 
(1)Audit Fees  consist of  aggregate  fees  billed for  professional  services rendered for the audit of our annual financial statements and review of the interim financial statements included in quarterly reports or services that are  normally  provided  by the  independent  auditors in  connection  with statutory and regulatory  filings or engagements for the fiscal years ended December 31, 20082009 and December 31, 2007,2008, respectively.

40
  
(2)Audit-Related Fees consist of aggregate fees billed for assurance and related services that are reasonably related to the performance of the audit or review of our financial statements and are not reported under “Audit Fees.”
  
(3)Tax Fees consist of aggregate fees billed for preparation of our federal and state income tax returns and other tax compliance activities.
  
(4)All Other Fees consist of aggregate fees billed for products and services provided by Holtz Rubenstein Reminick LLP,our independent auditors, other than those disclosed above. TheseDuring the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009, these fees related to the audit of CMIC’s pre-acquisition financial statements as of December 31, 2007 and 2008 and for the years then ended, review of CMIC’s interim financial statements as of June 30, 2009 and for six months ended June 30, 2008 and 2009 and other general accounting services. During the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008, these fees related to the review of the Uniform Franchise Offering Circular of our former wholly-owned subsidiary, DCAP Management Corp., and other general accounting services.

The Audit Committee is responsible for the appointment, compensation and oversight of the work of the independent auditors and approves in advance any services to be performed by the independent auditors, whether audit-related or not.  The Audit Committee reviews each proposed engagement to determine whether the provision of services is compatible with maintaining the independence of the independent auditors.  AllSubstantially all of the fees shown above were pre-approved by the Audit Committee.
 
59

PART IV
 
ITEM 15.                      EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES.
 
Exhibit
Number
Description of Exhibit
  
2(a)Amended and Restated Purchase and Sale Agreement, dated as of February 1, 2008, by and among Premium Financing Specialists, Inc., Payments Inc. and DCAP Group, Inc. (1)
  
2(b)Asset Purchase Agreement, dated as of March 27, 2009, by and among NII BSA LLC, Barry Scott Agency, Inc., DCAP Accurate, Inc. and DCAP Group, Inc. (2)
2(c)Stock Purchase Agreement, dated as of May 1, 2009, by and between Stuart Greenvald and Abraham Weinzimer and DCAP Group, Inc. (3)
2(d)Stock Purchase Agreement, dated as of June 30, 2009, by and between Barry Lefkowitz and Blast Acquisition Corp. (4)
  
3(a)Restated Certificate of Incorporation (2)(5)
  
3(b)Certificate of DesignationsAmendment of Series A Preferred Stock (3)Certificate of Incorporation with regard to name change (6)
  
3(c)Certificate of Designations of Series BA Preferred Stock (4)(7)
  
3(d)Certificate of Designations of Series CB Preferred Stock (5)(8)
  
3(e)Certificate of Designations of Series DC Preferred Stock (6)(9)
  
3(f)Certificate of Designations of Series D Preferred Stock (10)
3(g)Certificate of Designations of Series E Preferred Stock (11)
3(h)By-laws, as amended (7)(12)
  
10(a)1998 Stock Option Plan, as amended (8)(13)
41
  
10(b)Unit Purchase Agreement, dated as of July 2, 2003, by and among DCAP Group, Inc. and the purchasers named therein (9)(14)
  
10(c)Form of Secured Subordinated Promissory Note, dated July 10, 2003, issued by DCAP Group, Inc. with respect to indebtedness in the original aggregate principal amount of $3,500,000 (9)(14)
  
10(d)Letter agreement, dated May 25, 2005, between DCAP Group, Inc. and Jack Seibald as representative and attorney-in-fact with respect to the outstanding debt (6)(10)
60

  
10(e)Letter agreement, dated March 23, 2007, between DCAP Group, Inc. and Jack Seibald as representative and attorney-in-fact with respect to the outstanding debt (6)(10)
  
10(f)Letter agreement, dated September 30, 2007, between DCAP Group, Inc. and Jack Seibald as representative and attorney-in-fact with respect to the outstanding debt (10)(15)
  
10(g)Letter agreement, dated August 13, 2008, between DCAP Group, Inc. and Jack Seibald as representative and attorney-in-fact with respect to the outstanding debt (6)(10)
  
10(h)Registration Rights Agreement, dated July 10, 2003, by and among DCAP Group, Inc. and the purchasers named therein (9)(14)
  
10(i) 2005 Equity Participation Plan (11)(16)
  
10(j)Surplus Note, dated April 1, 1998, in the principal amount of $3,000,000 issued by Commercial Mutual Insurance Company to DCAP Group, Inc. (11)(16)
  
10(k)Surplus Note, dated March 12, 1999, in the principal amount of $750,000 issued by Commercial Mutual Insurance Company to DCAP Group, Inc. (11)(16)
  
10(l)Employment Agreement, dated as of October 16, 2007, between DCAP Group, Inc. and  Barry B. Goldstein (12)(17)
  
10(m)Amendment No. 1, dated as of August 25, 2008, to Employment Agreement between DCAP Group, Inc. and Barry B. Goldstein (6)(10)
  
10(n)Amendment No. 2, dated as of March 24, 2010, to Employment Agreement between Kingstone Companies, Inc. (formerly DCAP Group, Inc.) and Barry B. Goldstein (18)
10(o)Employment Contract, effective on July 1, 2008, between Commercial Mutual Insurance Company and Barry B. Goldstein
10(p)Stock Option Agreement, dated as of October 16, 2007, between DCAP Group, Inc. and  Barry B. Goldstein (12)(17)
10(q)Form of Promissory Note issued in June 2009 and due July 10, 2011 (19)
10(r)Form of Promissory Note issued in September 2009 and due July 10, 2011 (applicable to Promissory Notes issued in December 2009 and January 2010) (20)
10(s)Employment Contract, dated as of September 13, 2006, between Commercial Mutual Insurance Company and Successor Companies and John D. Reiersen
10(t)Amendment No. 1, dated as of January 25, 2008, to Employment Contract between Commercial Mutual Insurance Company and Successor Companies and John D. Reiersen, dated as of September 13, 2006
61

10(u)Amendment No. 2, dated as of July 18, 2008, to Employment Contract between Commercial Mutual Insurance Company and Successor Companies and John D. Reiersen, dated as of September 13, 2006, and Amendment No. 1, dated as of January 25, 2008
10(v)Stock Option Agreement, dated as of March 24, 2010, between Kingstone Companies, Inc. and Barry B. Goldstein (18)
  
14Code of Ethics (13)(21)
  
21Subsidiaries
  
23Consent of Holtz Rubenstein Reminick LLP
42
  
31(a)Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of Principal Executive Officer as Adopted Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
  
31(b)Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of Principal Financial Officer as Adopted Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
  
32Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
__________

(1)Denotes document filed as an exhibit to our Current Report on Form 8-K for an event dated February 1, 2008 and incorporated herein by reference.
  
(2)Denotes document filed as an exhibit to our QuarterlyAnnual Report on Form 10-QSB10-K for the periodfiscal year ended September 30, 2004December 31, 2008 and incorporated herein by reference.
  
(3)Denotes document filed as an exhibit to our Current Report on Form 8-K for an event dated May 28, 20036, 2009 and incorporated herein by reference.
  
(4)Denotes document filed as an exhibit to our AnnualCurrent Report on Form 10-KSB8-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006an event dated June 30, 2009 and incorporated herein by reference.
  
(5)Denotes document filed as an exhibit to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2008September 30, 2004 and incorporated herein by reference.
  
(6)Denotes document filed as an exhibit to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended SeptemberJune 30, 20082009 and incorporated herein by reference.
  
(7)Denotes document filed as an exhibit to our Current Report on Form 8-K for an event dated December 26, 2007May 28, 2003 and incorporated herein by reference.
  
(8)Denotes document filed as an exhibit to our Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006 and incorporated herein by reference.
62

(9)Denotes document filed as an exhibit to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2008 and incorporated herein by reference.
(10)Denotes document filed as an exhibit to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2008 and incorporated herein by reference.
(11)Denotes document filed as an exhibit to our Current Report on Form 8-K for an event dated May 12, 2009 and incorporated herein by reference.
(12)Denotes document filed as an exhibit to our Current Report on Form 8-K for an event dated November 5, 2009 and incorporated herein by reference.
(13)Denotes document filed as an exhibit to our Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2002 and incorporated herein by reference.
  
(9)(14)Denotes document filed as an exhibit to Amendment No. 1 to our Current Report on Form 8-K for an event dated May 28, 2003 and incorporated herein by reference.
  
(10)(15)Denotes document filed as an exhibit to our Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007 and incorporated herein by reference.
  
(11)(16)Denotes document filed as an exhibit to our Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005 and incorporated herein by reference.
  
(12)(17)Denotes document filed as an exhibit to our Current Report on Form 8-K for an event dated October 16, 2007 and incorporated herein by reference.
43
  
(13)(18)Denotes document filed as an exhibit to our Current Report on Form 8-K for an event dated March 24, 2010 and incorporated herein by reference
(19)Denotes document filed as an exhibit to our Current Report on Form 8-K for an event dated June 22, 2009 and incorporated herein by reference.
(20)Denotes document filed as an exhibit to our Current Report on Form 8-K for an event dated September 16, 2009 and incorporated herein by reference.
(21)Denotes document filed as an exhibit to our Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2003 and incorporated herein by reference.


63 

44



Index to Consolidated Financial Statements
DCAP GROUP, INC. AND

SUBSIDIARIES

Contents
Years Ended December 31, 2008 and 2007


Consolidated Financial StatementsPage
 ReportReports of  Independent Registered Public Accounting FirmFirmsF-2 – F-3
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2009 and 2008 F-3F-4
Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income for the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008 F-4
 Consolidated Statement of Stockholders' EquityF-5
Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity for the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008F-6
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008  F-6 - F-7 – F-8
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements  F-8 - F-29F-9

 

F-1



Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm



To the Board of Directors and Stockholdersstockholders of
DCAP Group,Kingstone Companies, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Hewlett, New YorkNY

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheetssheet of DCAP Group,Kingstone Companies, Inc. and Subsidiaries as of December 31, 2008 and 20072009 and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders' equity and cash flowsflow for the yearsyear then ended. These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audits.audit.

We conducted our auditsaudit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the auditsaudit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, auditsan audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our auditsaudit included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company's internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion.  An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclo sures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

As described in Note 23 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company has reclassified the 2008 consolidated financial statements to reflect discontinued operations of its franchise business.

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Kingstone Companies, Inc. and Subsidiaries as of December 31, 2009 and the results of their operations and their cash flows for the year then ended in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
We have audited the adjustments to the 2008 consolidated financial statements to retrospectively apply the change in accounting classification, as described in Note 23. In our opinion, such adjustments are appropriate and have been properly applied. We were not engaged to audit, review, or apply any procedures to the 2008 consolidated financial statements of the Company other than with respect to the adjustments and, accordingly, we do not express an opinion or any other form of assurance on the 2008 consolidated financial statements taken as a whole.





/s/  Amper, Politziner & Mattia, LLP
Edison, New Jersey
April 7, 2010


F-2


Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm



Board of Directors and Stockholders
Kingstone Companies, Inc. (formerly known as DCAP Group, Inc.) and Subsidiaries
Hewlett, New York

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of Kingstone Companies, Inc. (formerly known as DCAP Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries) as of December 31, 2008 and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders' equity and cash flows for the year then ended. These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audit.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our audit included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company's internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provideaudit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above, before the effects of the retrospective adjustment for the discontinued operations discussed in Note 23 to the consolidated financial statements, present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Kingstone Companies, Inc. (formerly known as DCAP Group, Inc. and SubsidiariesSubsidiaries) as of December 31, 2008 and 2007 and the results of their operations and their cash flows for the yearsyear then ended in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.


/s/ Holtz Rubenstein Reminick LLP

Melville, New York
April 13, 2009


F-2
DCAP GROUP, INC. AND 
SUBSIDIARIES 
Consolidated Balance Sheets  
December 31,2008  2007 
       
Assets      
Current Assets:      
Cash and cash equivalents $142,949  $1,030,822 
Accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of        
$40,000 at December 31, 2008 and $50,000 at December 31, 2007  201,787   215,179 
Prepaid expenses and other current assets  130,457   290,885 
Assets from discontinued operations  2,913,147   16,352,308 
Total current assets  3,388,340   17,889,194 
Property and equipment, net  90,493   155,679 
Notes receivable  5,935,704   5,170,804 
Deposits and other assets  6,096   29,649 
Total assets $9,420,633  $23,245,326 
         
Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity        
Current Liabilities:        
Accounts payable and accrued expenses $822,350  $570,449 
Current portion of long-term debt  1,593,210   2,098,989 
Other current liabilities  154,200   154,200 
Liabilities from discontinued operations  213,685   12,682,268 
Mandatorily redeemable preferred stock  780,000   780,000 
Total current liabilities  3,563,445   16,285,906 
         
Long-term debt  415,618   499,065 
Deferred income taxes  184,000   303,000 
         
Commitments        
         
Stockholders' Equity:        
Common stock, $.01 par value; authorized 10,000,000 shares; issued        
3,788,771 at December 31, 2008 and 3,750,447 shares at December 31, 2007  37,888   37,505 
Preferred stock, $.01 par value; authorized        
1,000,000 shares; 0 shares issued and outstanding  -   - 
Capital in excess of par  11,962,512   11,850,872 
Deficit  (5,522,448)  (4,545,242)
   6,477,952   7,343,135 
Treasury stock, at cost, 816,025 shares at December 31, 2008 and        
 781,423 shares at December 31, 2007  (1,220,382)  (1,185,780)
Total stockholders' equity  5,257,570   6,157,355 
Total liabilities and stockholders' equity $9,420,633  $23,245,326 

See notes to consolidated financial statements
F-3
DCAP GROUP, INC. AND 
SUBSIDIARIES 
       
Consolidated Statements of Operations  
Years Ended December 31, 2008  2007 
       
Commissions and fee revenue $911,225  $649,246 
         
Operating expenses:        
General and administrative expenses  1,860,485   2,275,441 
Depreciation and amortization  69,624   84,422 
Total operating expenses  1,930,109   2,359,863 
         
Operating loss  (1,018,884)  (1,710,617)
         
Other (expense) income:        
Interest income  4,338   9,633 
Interest income - notes receivable  764,899   1,287,819 
Interest expense  (270,646)  (432,351)
Interest expense - mandatorily redeemable preferred stock  (66,625)  (39,000)
Total other income  431,966   826,101 
         
Loss from continuing operations before benefit from income taxes  (586,918)  (884,516)
Benefit from income taxes  (391,225)  (419,232)
Loss from continuing operations  (195,693)  (465,284)
(Loss) income from discontinued operations, net of income taxes  (781,513)  417,839 
Net loss $(977,206) $(47,445)
         
Basic and Diluted Net (Loss) Income Per Common Share:        
         
Loss from continuing operations $(0.07) $(0.16)
(Loss) income from discontinued operations $(0.26) $0.14 
Loss per common share $(0.33) $(0.02)
         
Number of weighted average shares used in computation        
 of basic and diluted loss per common share  2,972,597   2,963,036 
         

See notes to consolidated financial statements

F-4
DCAP GROUP, INC. AND
SUBSIDIARIES
                            
Consolidated Statement of Stockholders' Equity
Years Months Ended December 31, 2007 and 2008
                            
              Capital             
  Common Stock  Preferred Stock  in Excess     Treasury Stock    
  Shares  Amount  Shares  Amount  of Par  (Deficit)  Shares  Amount  Total 
Balance, December 31, 2006  3,672,947  $36,730   -  $-  $11,633,884  $(4,497,797)  776,923  $(1,178,555) $5,994,262 
Exercise of stock options  74,500   745   -   -   111,455   -   -   -   112,200 
Stock-based payments  3,000   30   -   -   105,533   -   -   -   105,563 
Return of stock as settlement of liability  -   -   -   -   -   -   4,500   (7,225)  (7,225)
Net loss  -   -   -   -   -   (47,445)  -   -   (47,445)
Balance, December 31, 2007  3,750,447   37,505   -   -   11,850,872   (4,545,242)  781,423   (1,185,780)  6,157,355 
Stock-based payments  38,324   383   -   -   111,640   -   -   -   112,023 
Return of stock as settlement of liability  -   -   -   -   -   -   34,602   (34,602)  (34,602)
Net loss  -   -   -   -   -   (977,206)  -   -   (977,206)
Balance, December 31, 2008  3,788,771  $37,888   -  $-  $11,962,512  $(5,522,448)  816,025  $(1,220,382) $5,257,570 

See notes to consolidated financial statements
 
F-5

KINGSTONE COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES 
       
Consolidated Balance Sheets   
December 31, 2009  2008 
       
 Assets
      
 Short term investments $225,336  $- 
 Fixed-maturity securities, available for sale, at fair value (amortized cost of $12,676,867)  12,791,080   - 
 Equity securities, available-for-sale, at fair value (cost of $1,973,738)  2,186,926   - 
 Total investments  15,203,342   - 
 Cash and cash equivalents  625,320   142,949 
 Investment income receivable  135,251   - 
 Premiums receivable, net of of provision for uncollectible amounts  4,479,363   - 
 Receivables - reinsurance contracts  564,408   - 
 Reinsurance receivables, net of of provision for uncollectible amounts  20,849,621   - 
 Notes receivable-CMIC  -   5,935,704 
 Notes receivable-sale of business  1,119,365   - 
 Deferred acquisition costs  2,917,984   - 
 Intangible assets  4,612,100   - 
 Property and equipment, net of accumulated depreciation  1,659,015   82,617 
 Equities in pools and associations  220,708   - 
 Other assets  257,276   97,143 
 Assets of discontinued operations  -   3,178,219 
 Total assets
 $52,643,753  $9,436,632 
         
 Liabilities
        
 Loss and loss adjustment expenses $16,513,318  $- 
 Unearned premiums  14,088,187   - 
 Advance premiums  411,676   - 
 Reinsurance balances payable  1,918,169   - 
 Deferred ceding commission revenue  3,298,245   - 
 Notes payable (payable to related parties of $560,000 at December 31, 2009        
 and $403,000 at December 31, 2008)  1,085,637   2,008,828 
 Accounts payable, accrued liabilities and other liabilities  2,446,558   966,741 
 Deferred income taxes  1,173,256   200,000 
 Mandatorily redeemable preferred stock  1,299,231   780,000 
 Liabilties of discontinued operations  26,000   223,493 
 Total liabilities
  42,260,277   4,179,062 
         
 Commitments        
         
 Stockholders' Equity:        
 Common stock, $.01 par value; authorized 10,000,000 shares; issued 3,804,536 shares at        
 December 31, 2009 and 3,788,771 shares at December 31, 2008; outstanding 2,988,511        
 shares at December 31, 2009 and 2,972,746 shares at December 31, 2008  38,046   37,888 
 Preferred stock, $.01 par value; authorized        
 1,000,000 shares; 0 shares issued and outstanding  -   - 
 Capital in excess of par  12,051,332   11,962,512 
 Accumulated other comprehensive income  216,086   - 
 Accumulated deficit  (701,606)  (5,522,448)
   11,603,858   6,477,952 
 Treasury stock, at cost, 816,025 shares  (1,220,382)  (1,220,382)
 Total stockholders' equity  10,383,476   5,257,570 
         
 Total liabilities and stockholders' equity $52,643,753  $9,436,632 
 
DCAP GROUP, INC. AND 
SUBSIDIARIES 
       
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows  
Years Ended December 31, 2008  2007 
       
Cash Flows from Operating Activities:     
 
Net loss $(977,206) $(47,445)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities:        
Depreciation and amortization  69,624   121,555 
Bad debt expense  44,091   37,070 
Accretion of discount on notes receivable  (576,228)  (987,818)
Amortization of warrants  17,731   40,120 
Stock-based payments  112,023   105,563 
Deferred income taxes  (487,000)  (34,000)
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:        
Decrease (increase) in assets:        
Accounts receivable  (104,221)  41,382 
Prepaid expenses and other current assets  7,500   (208,622)
Deposits and other assets  23,553   (26,990)
Increase (decrease) in liabilities:        
Accounts payable, accrued expenses and taxes payable  251,901   126,180 
Other current liabilities  -   (11,946)
Deferred taxes payable  368,000   - 
Net cash used in operating activities of continuing operations  (1,250,232)  (844,951)
Operating activities of discontinued operations  497,592   470,575 
Net Cash Used in Operating Activities  (752,640)  (374,376)
         
Cash Flows from Investing Activities:        
Decrease in notes and other receivables - net  3,176   2,374 
Purchase of property and equipment  (4,438)  (58,937)
Net cash used in investing activities of continuing operations  (1,262)  (56,563)
Investing activities of discontinued operations  1,035,163   2,190,386 
Net Cash Provided by Investing Activities  1,033,901   2,133,823 
         
Cash Flows from Financing Activities:        
Principal payments on long-term debt  (606,957)  (570,589)
Proceeds from exercise of options and warrants  -   112,200 
Net cash used in financing activities of continuing operations  (606,957)  (458,389)
Financing activities of discontinued operations  (562,177)  (1,466,648)
Net Cash Used in Financing Activities  (1,169,134)  (1,925,037)

See notes to consolidated financial statements
F-6

DCAP GROUP, INC. AND 
SUBSIDIARIES 
       
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (continued)  
Years Ended December 31, 2008  2007 
       
Net Decrease in Cash and Cash Equivalents  (887,873)  (165,590)
Cash and Cash Equivalents, beginning of year  1,030,822   1,196,412 
Cash and Cash Equivalents, end of year $142,949  $1,030,822 
         
Supplemental Schedule of Non-Cash Investing and Financing Activities:        
Liabilties assumed by purchaser of premium finance portfolio $11,229,060  $- 
Computer equipment acquired under capital leases $-  $89,819 
 

See notes to accompanying consolidated financial statementsstatements.
 
F-7
F-4

DCAP GROUP, INC. AND
SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Financial Statements
Years Ended December 31, 2008 and 2007
 
1. Organization
KINGSTONE COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES 
       
Consolidated Statements of Operations  
Years Ended December 31, 2009  2008 
       
 Revenues
      
 Net premiums earned $4,526,341  $- 
 Ceding commission revenue  2,215,081   - 
 Net investment income  225,676   - 
 Net realized losses on investments  (30,628)  - 
 Other income  730,305   429,642 
 Total revenues  7,666,775   429,642 
         
 Expenses
        
 Loss and loss adjustment expenses  2,035,471   - 
 Commission expense  2,233,399   - 
 Other underwriting expenses  1,643,473   - 
 Other operating expenses  1,182,047   1,156,320 
 Acquistion transaction costs  210,430   32,896 
 Depreciation and amortization  269,092   36,774 
 Interest expense  184,217   270,646 
 Interest expense - mandatorily        
 redeemable preferred stock  127,158   66,625 
 Total expenses  7,885,287   1,563,261 
         
 Loss from operations  (218,512)  (1,133,619)
 Gain on acquistion of Kingstone Insurance Company  5,177,851   - 
 Interest income-CMIC note receivable  60,757   764,899 
 Income (loss) from continuing operations before taxes  5,020,096   (368,720)
 Benefit from tax  (66,804)  (448,197)
 Income from continuing operations  5,086,900   79,477 
 Loss from discontinued operations, net of taxes  (266,058)  (1,056,683)
 Net income (loss)
  4,820,842   (977,206)
 Gross unrealized investment holding gains        
 arising during period  327,402   - 
 Income tax expense related to items of        
 other comprehensive income  (111,316)  - 
 Comprehensive income (loss)
 $5,036,928  $(977,206)
         
Basic and diluted earnings (loss) per common share:        
Income from continuing operations $1.71  $0.03 
Loss from discontinued operations $(0.09) $(0.36)
Income (loss) per common share $1.62  $(0.33)
         
Basic and diluted weighted average common shares outstanding  2,975,668   2,972,547 

See notes to accompanying consolidated financial statements.

F-5


KINGSTONE COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
                               
Consolidated Statement of Stockholders' Equity 
Years Ended December 31, 2009 and 2008
                               
                 Accumulated             
              Capital  Other             
  Common Stock  Preferred Stock  in Excess  Comprehensive  Accumulated  Treasury Stock    
  Shares  Amount  Shares  Amount  of Par  Income  (Deficit)  Shares  Amount  Total 
Balance, December 31, 2007  3,750,447  $37,505   -  $-  $11,850,872  $-  $(4,545,242)  781,423  $(1,185,780) $6,157,355 
Stock-based payments  38,324   383   -   -   111,640       -   -   -   112,023 
Return of stock as settlement of liability  -   -   -   -   -       -   34,602   (34,602)  (34,602)
Net loss  -   -   -   -   -       (977,206)  -   -   (977,206)
Balance, December 31, 2008  3,788,771   37,888   -   -   11,962,512       (5,522,448)  816,025   (1,220,382)  5,257,570 
Stock-based payments  15,765   158   -   -   88,820   -   -   -   -   88,978 
Net income  -   -   -   -   -   -   4,820,842   -   -   4,820,842 
Net unrealized gains on securities                                        
available for sale, net of income tax  -   -   -   -   -   216,086   -   -   -   216,086 
Balance, December 31, 2009  3,804,536  $38,046   -  $-  $12,051,332  $216,086  $(701,606)  816,025  $(1,220,382) $10,383,476 

See notes to accompanying consolidated financial statements.


F-6



KINGSTONE COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES 
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows  
Years Ended December 31, 2009  2008��
       
 Cash flows provided by (used in) operating activities:
      
 Net income (loss) $4,820,842  $(977,206)
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by (used in) operations:     
 Gain on acquistion of Kingstone Insurance Company  (5,177,851)  - 
 Gain on sale of investments  (215,523)  - 
 Other-than-temporary-impairment loss on investments  49,612   - 
 Loss on sale of fixed assets  49,325   - 
 Depreciation and amortization  269,092   36,774 
 Accretion of discount on notes receivable  -   (576,228)
 Amortization of warrants  -   17,731 
 Stock-based payments  88,978   112,023 
 Amortization of bond premium or discount  28,976   - 
 Deferred income taxes  (294,114)  (491,000)
 (Increase) decrease in assets:        
 Short term investments  536,790   - 
 Premiums receivable, net  276,785   - 
 Receivables - reinsurance contracts  573,424   - 
 Reinsurance receivables, net  (900,422)  - 
 Deferred acquisition costs  (252,182)  - 
 Other assets  90,127   (1,505)
 Increase (decrease) in liabilities:        
 Loss and loss adjustment expenses  82,127   - 
 Unearned premiums  208,813   - 
 Advance premiums  73,622   - 
 Reinsurance balances payable  (87,421)  - 
 Deferred ceding commission revenue  597,869   - 
 Accounts payable, accrued liabilities and other liabilities  316,994   621,063 
 Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities of continuing operations  1,135,863   (1,258,348)
 Operating activities of discontinued operations  63,525   505,708 
 Net cash flows provided by (used in) operations
  1,199,388   (752,640)
         
 Cash flows provided by (used in) investing activities:
        
 Purchase - fixed-maturity securities  (6,073,817)  - 
 Purchase - equity securities  (1,574,283)  - 
 Sale or maturity - fixed-maturity securities  2,735,777   - 
 Sale - equity securities  1,533,552   - 
 Cash acquired in acquisition  1,327,057   - 
 Increase in accrued interest - Commercial Mutual Insurance Company  (60,757)  - 
 Increase in notes receivable and accrued interest - Sale of businesses  (127,912)  - 
 Collections of notes receivable and accrued interest - Sale of businesses  56,120   - 
 Other investing activities  1,578   (168,000)
 Net cash used in investing activities of continuing operations  (2,182,685)  (168,000)
 Investing activities of discontinued operations  1,869,628   1,201,901 
 Net cash flows (used in) provided by investing activities
  (313,057)  1,033,901 
         
 Cash flows used in financing activities:
        
 Proceeds from long term debt  1,050,000   - 
 Principal payments on long-term debt  (1,453,960)  (606,957)
 Net cash used in financing activities of continuing operations  (403,960)  (606,957)
 Financing activities of discontinued operations  -   (562,177)
 Net cash flows used in financing activities
  (403,960)  (1,169,134)

See notes to accompanying consolidated financial statements.


F-7



KINGSTONE COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES 
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (Continued)  
Years Ended December 31, 2009  2008 
       
 Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents  482,371   (887,873)
 Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of year  142,949   1,030,822 
 Cash and cash equivalents, end of year $625,320  $142,949 

See notes to accompanying consolidated financial statements.

F-8


KINGSTONE COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2009 AND 2008

Note 1 - Basis of Presentation and Nature of Business

On July 1, 2009, Kingstone Companies, Inc. (formerly known as DCAP Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries) (referred to herein as "we""Kingstone" or "us"the “Company”) operatecompleted the acquisition of 100% of the issued and outstanding common stock of Kingstone Insurance Company (“KICO”) (formerly known as Commercial Mutual Insurance Company (“CMIC”)) pursuant to the conversion of CMIC from an advance premium cooperative to a stock property and casualty insurance company (See Note 3). Pursuant to the plan of conversion, Kingstone acquired a 100% equity interest in KICO, in consideration for the exchange of $3,750,000 principal amount of surplus notes of CMIC. In addition, Kingstone forgave all accrued and unpaid interest of approximately $2,246,000 on the surplus notes as of the date of conversion. 
Effective July 1, 2009, Kingstone, through its subsidiary KICO, offers property and casualty insurance products to small businesses and individuals in New York State. The effect of the KICO acquisition is only included in the Company’s results of operations and cash flows for the period from July 1, 2009 (the KICO acquisition date) through December 31, 2009. Accordingly, disclosures pertaining to KICO will only include the six months ended December 31, 2009.
Effective as of July 1, 2009, the Company changed its name from DCAP Group, Inc. to Kingstone Companies, Inc.
Until December 2008, continuing operations primarily consisted of the ownership and operation of a network of retail officesinsurance brokerage and franchise operationsagency offices engaged in the sale of retail auto, motorcycle, boat, business, and homeowner's insurance,insurance.
In December 2008, due to declining revenues and untilprofits, the Company made a decision to restructure its network of retail offices (the “Retail Business”). The plan of restructuring called for the closing of seven of the least profitable locations during the month of December 2008 and the entry into negotiations to sell the remaining 19 locations of the Retail Business. On April 17, 2009, the Company sold substantially all of the assets, including the book of business, of its 16 remaining Retail Business locations that it owned in New York State (the “New York Sale”) (see Note 23). Effective June 30, 2009, the Company sold all of the outstanding stock of the subsidiary that operated its three remaining Retail Locations in Pennsylvania (the “Pennsylvania Sale”) (see Note 23).  As a result of the restructuring in December 2008, the New York Sale on April 17, 2009 and the Pennsylvania Sale effective June 30, 2009, the Retail Business has been presented as discontinued operations and prior periods have been restated.
Until May 2009, the Company operated a DCAP franchise business.  Effective May 1, 2009, the Company sold all of the outstanding stock of the subsidiaries that operated such DCAP franchise business (see Note 23).  As a result of the sale, the franchise business has been presented as discontinued operations and prior periods have been restated.
Until February 1, 2008, the Company provided premium financing of insurance policies for customersclients of ourits offices as well as customersclients of non-affiliated entities. On February 1, 2008, wethe Company sold ourits outstanding premium finance loan portfolio (see Note 13)23). As a result of the sale, ourthe premium financing operations have been classified as discontinued operations and prior periods have been restated.operations. The purchaser of the premium finance portfolio has agreed that, during the five year period ending January 31, 2013 (subject to automatic renewal for successive two year terms under certain circumstances), it will purchase, assume and service premium finance contracts originated by usthe Company in the states of New York and Pennsylvania. In connection with such purchases, wethe Company will be entitled to receive a fee generally equal to a percentage of the amount financed.  Our 0; The Company’s continuing operations of the premium financing business will consist of the revenue earned from placement fees and any related expenses.  We also provide automobile club services for roadside emergencies and tax preparation services.
 
In December 2008, due to declining revenues and profits, we made a decision to restructure our network of retail offices (the “Retail Business”). The plan of restructuring called for closing seven of our least profitable locations during the month of December 2008, and to enter into negotiations to sell the remaining 19 locations in our Retail Business. On March 30, 2009, an asset purchase agreement (the “APA”) was fully executed pursuant to which we agreed to sell substantially all of the assets, including the book of business, of our 16 remaining Retail Business locations (the “Assets”) that we own in New York State (see Notes 13 and 17). The closing of the sale of the Assets is subject to a number of conditions. As a result of the restructuring in December 2008, and the APA on March 30, 2009, our Retail Business has been reclassified as discontinued operations and prior periods have been restated.
F-9

Note 2 – Accounting Policies
 
2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Principles of consolidation -The accompanying consolidated financial statements includehave been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the accountsUnited States of all subsidiariesAmerica “GAAP”).
Reclassification
The Company has reclassified certain amounts in its 2008 consolidated balance sheet and joint ventures in which we have a majority voting interest2008 statements of operations to conform to the 2009 presentation. None of these reclassifications had an effect on the Company’s consolidated net earnings, total stockholders’ equity or voting control.cash flows. All significant intercompany accounts andinter-company transactions have been eliminated.eliminated in consolidation.
Principles of Consolidation

CommissionThe consolidated financial statements consist of Kingstone and feeits wholly-owned subsidiaries. Subsidiaries acquired on July 1, 2009 include KICO and its subsidiaries, CMIC Properties, Inc. (“CMIC Properties”) and 15 Joys Lane, LLC (“15 Joys Lane”), which together own the land and building from which KICO operates.
Supplemental Disclosures of Cash Flow Information
The table below presents the cash paid for income - Franchise fee revenue on initial franchisee fees is recognized when substantially all of our contractual requirements under the franchise agreement are completed. Franchisees also pay a monthly franchise fee plus an applicable percentage of advertising expense. We are obligated to provide marketingtaxes and training support to each franchisee.  Duringinterest for the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively, and 2007, approximately $-0-the non-cash investing and $110,000, respectively, wasfinancing activities.
Years Ended December 31, 2009  2008 
       
 Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information:
      
 Cash paid for income taxes $121,437  $23,350 
 Cash paid for interest  369,750   375,883 
         
 Schedule of non-cash investing and financing activities:        
 Exchange of notes receivable as consideration paid for the acquistion of        
 Kingstone Insurance Company  5,996,461   - 
 Notes received in connection with sale of businesses  1,047,573   - 
 Notes payable exchanged for mandatorily redeemable preferred stock  519,231   - 
 Liabilties assumed by purchaser of premium finance portfolio  -   11,229,060 

Revenue Recognition
Net Premiums Earned
Insurance policies issued by the Company are short-duration contracts. Accordingly, premium revenue, net of premiums ceded to reinsurers, is recognized as initial franchise fee income.earned in proportion to the amount of insurance protection provided, on a pro-rata basis over the terms of the underlying policies. Unearned premiums represent premium applicable to the unexpired portions of in-force insurance contracts at the end of each year.
Ceding Commission Revenue
Commissions on reinsurance premiums ceded are earned in a manner consistent with the recognition of the costs of the reinsurance, generally on a pro-rata basis over the terms of the policies reinsured. Unearned amounts are recorded as deferred ceding commission revenue. Certain reinsurance agreements contain provisions whereby the ceding commission rates vary based on the loss experience under the agreements. The Company records ceding commission revenue based on its current estimate of subject losses. The Company records adjustments to the ceding commission revenue in the period that changes in the estimated losses are determined.
F-10

Liability for Loss and Loss Adjustment Expenses (“LAE”)
The liability for loss and LAE represents management’s best estimate of the ultimate cost of all reported and unreported losses that are unpaid as of the balance sheet date. The liability for loss and LAE is estimated on an undiscounted basis, using individual case-basis valuations, statistical analyses and various actuarial procedures. The projection of future claim payment and reporting is based on an analysis of the Company’s historical experience, supplemented by analyses of industry loss data. Management believes that the reserves for loss and LAE are adequate to cover the ultimate cost of losses and claims to date; however, because of the uncertainty from various sources, including changes in reporting patterns, claims settlement patterns, judicial decisions, legislation, and economic conditions, actual loss experienc e may not conform to the assumptions used in determining the estimated amounts for such liability at the balance sheet date. As adjustments to these estimates become necessary, such adjustments are reflected in expense for the period in which the estimates are changed. Because of the nature of the business historically written, the Company’s management believes that the Company has limited exposure to environmental claim liabilities. The Company recognizes recoveries from salvage and subrogation when received.

Allowance
Reinsurance
In the normal course of business, the Company seeks to reduce the loss that may arise from catastrophes or other events that cause unfavorable underwriting results by reinsuring certain levels of risk in various areas of exposure with other insurance enterprises or reinsurers.
Reinsurance receivables represents management’s best estimate of paid and unpaid loss and LAE recoverable from reinsurers. Ceded losses receivable are estimated using techniques and assumptions consistent with those used in estimating the liability for loss and LAE. Management believes that reinsurance receivables as recorded represent its best estimate of such amounts; however, as changes in the estimated ultimate liability for loss and LAE are determined, the estimated ultimate amount receivable from the reinsurers will also change. Accordingly, the ultimate receivable could be significantly in excess of or less than the amount indicated in the consolidated financial statements. As adjustments to these estimates become necessary, such adjustments are reflected in current operations. Loss and LAE incurred as presented in the con solidated statement of income and comprehensive income are net of reinsurance recoveries.

The Company accounts for reinsurance in accordance with GAAP guidance for accounting and reporting for reinsurance of short-duration contracts. Management has evaluated its reinsurance arrangements and determined that significant insurance risk is transferred to the reinsurers. Reinsurance agreements have been determined to be short-duration prospective contracts and, accordingly, the costs of the reinsurance are recognized over the life of the contract in a manner consistent with the earning of premiums on the underlying policies subject to the reinsurance contract.

In preparing financial statements, management estimates uncollectible amounts receivable from reinsurers based on an assessment of factors including the creditworthiness of the reinsurers and the adequacy of collateral obtained, where applicable. The allowance for uncollectible reinsurance as of December 31, 2009 was approximately $146,000. The Company did not expense any uncollectible reinsurance for the year ended December 31, 2009. Significant uncertainties are inherent in the assessment of the creditworthiness of reinsurers and estimates of any uncollectible amounts due from reinsurers. Any change in the ability of the Company’s reinsurers to meet their contractual obligations could have a detrimental impact on the consolidated financial statements and KICO’s ability to meet their regulatory capital and surplus requirem ents.
F-11

Cash and Cash Equivalents
Cash and cash equivalents are presented at cost, which approximates fair value. The Company considers all highly liquid investments with original maturities of three months or less to be cash equivalents.
The Company maintains its cash balances at several financial institutions. The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”) secures accounts up to $250,000 at these institutions through December 31, 2013 at which time the insured limit is scheduled to revert back to $100,000. In March 2010, the Company was notified by the FDIC that a bank in which the Company had deposits totaling approximately $497,000 had failed (See Note 24 Subsequent Events).
Investments
The Company accounts for its investments in accordance with GAAP guidance for investments in debt and equity securities, which requires that fixed-maturity and equity securities that have readily determined fair values be segregated into categories based upon the Company’s intention for those securities. In accordance with this guidance, the Company has classified its fixed-maturity and equity securities as available-for-sale. The Company may sell its available-for-sale securities in response to changes in interest rates, risk/reward characteristics, liquidity needs or other factors.

Fixed-maturity securities and equity securities are reported at their estimated fair values based on quoted market prices from a recognized pricing service, with unrealized gains and losses, net of tax effects, reported as a separate component of comprehensive income in stockholders’ equity. Realized gains and losses are determined on the specific identification method.

Investment income is accrued to the date of the financial statements and includes amortization of premium and accretion of discount on fixed maturities. Interest is recognized when earned, while dividends are recognized when declared.

Impairment of investment securities results in a charge to operations when a market decline below cost is deemed to be other-than-temporary. The Company regularly reviews its fixed-maturity and equity securities portfolios to evaluate the necessity of recording impairment losses for other-than-temporary declines in the fair value of investments. In evaluating potential impairment, management considers, among other criteria, the following: the current fair value compared to amortized cost or cost, as appropriate; the length of time the security’s fair value has been below amortized cost or cost; management’s intent and ability to retain the investment for a period of time sufficient to allow for any anticipated recovery in fair value to cost or amortized cost; specific credit issues related to the issuer; and current economi c conditions. Other-than-temporary impairment (“OTTI”) losses result in a permanent reduction of the cost basis of the underlying investment. The Company determined that none of its fixed-maturity and equity securities portfolios were OTTI as of December 31, 2009 and 2008. Accordingly, the Company did not record impairment write-downs for the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008.

Fair Value
The fair value hierarchy in GAAP prioritizes fair value measurements into three levels based on the nature of the inputs. Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities have the highest priority (“Level 1”), followed by observable inputs other than quoted prices, including prices for similar but not identical assets or liabilities (“Level 2”) and unobservable inputs, including the reporting entity’s estimates of the assumptions that market participants would use, having the lowest priority (“Level 3”).

F-12

For investments in active markets, the Company uses quoted market prices to determine fair value. In circumstances where quoted market prices are unavailable, the Company utilizes fair value estimates based upon other observable inputs including matrix pricing, benchmark interest rates, market comparables and other relevant inputs.

Premiums Receivable
Premiums receivable are presented net of an allowance for doubtful accounts - Management must make estimatesof approximately $69,000 as of December 31, 2009. The allowance for uncollectible amounts is based on an analysis of amounts receivable giving consideration to historical loss experience and current economic conditions and reflects an amount that, in management’s judgment, is adequate. Uncollectible premiums receivable balances of approximately $43,000 were written off for the six months ended December 31, 2009.
Deferred Acquisition Costs
Acquisition costs represent the costs of writing business that vary with, and are primarily related to, the production of insurance business (principally commissions, premium taxes and certain underwriting salaries). Policy acquisition costs are deferred and recognized as expense as related premiums are earned.

Intangible Assets
The Company has recorded acquired identifiable intangible assets. In accounting for such assets, the Company follows GAAP guidance for intangible assets. The cost of a group of assets acquired in a transaction is allocated to the individual assets including identifiable intangible assets based on their relative fair values. Identifiable intangible assets with a finite useful life are amortized over the period that the asset is expected to contribute directly or indirectly to the future cash flows of the uncollectability of accounts receivable. Management specifically analyzed accounts receivableCompany. Intangible assets with an indefinite life are not amortized and analyzes historical bad debts, customer concentrations, customer creditworthiness, current economic trends andare subject to annual impairment testing. All identifiable intangible assets are tested for recoverability whenever events or changes in customer payment terms when evaluatingcircumstances indicate that a carrying amount may not be recoverable. No impairment losses from intangible assets were recognize d for the adequacy of the allowance for doubtful accounts.years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008.

Property and equipment - PropertyEquipment
Building and building improvements, furniture, leasehold improvements, computer equipment, and software are statedreported at cost.cost less accumulated depreciation and amortization. Depreciation and amortization is provided using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the related assets. LeaseholdThe Company estimates the useful life for computer equipment, computer software, furniture and other equipment is three years, and building and building improvements are being amortized using the straight-line method over the estimated useful livesis 39 years.

The fair value of the relatedCompany’s real estate assets or the remaining termwas based on an appraisal dated August 31, 2009. The fair value of the lease.real estate assets is estimated to be in excess of the carrying value.
Income Taxes
Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax basis and for operating loss and tax credit carry forwards. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in income in the period that includes the enactment date. The Company will file a consolidated tax return with KICO for periods commencing July 1, 2009 (date of KICO acquisition). The Company adopted the relevant provisions of GAAP concerning uncertainties in income taxes on Ja nuary 1, 2007. At the adoption date and as of December 31, 2009, the Company had no material unrecognized tax benefits and no adjustments to liabilities or operations were required.

F-8
F-13

DCAP GROUP, INC. ANDAssessments
SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Financial Statements
Years Ended December 31, 2008 and 2007
 
Insurance related assessments are accrued in the period in which they have been incurred. A typical obligating event would be the issuance of an insurance policy or the occurrence of a claim. The Company is subject to a variety of assessments.
Concentration and Credit Risk
Financial instruments that potentially subject the Company to concentration of credit risk - We invest our excessare primarily cash in deposits and money market accounts with major financial institutions and have not experienced losses related to these investments.

We perform ongoing credit evaluations and generally do not require collateral.

Cash and cash equivalents, - We considerinvestments and accounts receivable. Investments are diversified through many industries and geographic regions through the investment committee which employs different investment strategies. The Company limits the amount of credit exposure with any one financial institution and believes that no significant concentration of credit risk exists with respect to cash and cash equivalents and investments. At December 31, 2009, the outstanding premiums receivable balance is generally diversified due to the number of entities composing the Company’s customer base, which is largely concentrated in the New York City area. To reduce credit risk, the Company obtains customer credit reports before it underwrites a policy. The Company also has receivables from its reinsurers. Reinsurance contracts do not relieve the Company from its obligations to policyholders. Failure of reinsurers to honor their obligations could result in losses to the Company. The Company periodically evaluates the financial condition of its reinsurers to minimize its exposure to significant losses from reinsurer insolvencies. Management’s policy is to review all highly liquidoutstanding receivables at period end as well as the bad debt instruments with a maturitywrite-offs experienced in the past and establish an allowance for doubtful accounts, if deemed necessary.
Gross premiums earned from lines of three months or lessbusiness that subject the Company to be cash equivalents.concentration risk from July 1, 2009 (the KICO acquisition date) through December 31, 2009 are as follows:
 Personal Lines66.5%
 Commercial Automobile23.6%
 Total premiums earned subject to concentration90.1%
 Premiums earned not subject to concentration9.9%
 Total premiums earned100.0%

Use of Estimates - -
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted accounting principlesin the United States of America (“GAAP”) requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. The most significant estimates include the allowance for finance receivable losses. It is reasonably possible that events could occur during the upcoming year which could change such estimates.

Net earnings (loss) per share -
Basic net earnings (loss) per common share is computed by dividing income (loss) available to common shareholdersstockholders by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding. Diluted earnings per share reflect, in periods in which they have a dilutive effect, the impact of common shares issuable upon exercise of stock options, warrants and conversion of mandatorily redeemable preferred shares.  The computation of diluted earnings per share excludes those options, warrants and warrantsmandatorily redeemable preferred shares with an exercise price in excess of the average market price of ourthe Company’s common shares during the periods presented. During the year ended December 31, 2008, we recorded a loss available to common shareholders and, as a result, the weighted average number of common shares used in the calculation of basic and diluted loss per share is the same, and have not been adjusted for the effects of 489,400 potential common shares from unexercised stock options and the conversion of convertible preferred shares, which were anti-dilutive for such period. During the year ended December 31, 2007, we recorded a loss available to common shareholders and, as a result, the weighted average number of shares of common shares used in the calculation of basic and diluted loss per share is the same, and have not been adjusted for the effects of 678,124 potential common shares from unexercised stock options and warrants, and the conversion of convertible preferred shares, which were anti-dilutive for such period.
F-14

Advertising Costs

Advertising costs - -
Advertising costs are charged to operations when the advertising first takes place. Included in general and administrative expenses are advertising costs approximating $66,000$26,000 and $262,000$-0- for the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008, and 2007, respectively.

Share-based Compensation

Impairment of long-lived assets - We review long-lived assets and certain identifiable intangibles to be held and used for impairment on an annual basis and whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset exceeds the fair value of the asset. If other events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset that we expect to hold and use may not be recoverable, we will estimate the undiscounted future cash flows expected to result from the use of the asset or its eventual disposition, and recognize an impairment loss. The impairment loss, if determined to be necessary, would be measured as the amount by which the carrying amount of the assets exceeds the fair value of the assets. A similar evaluation is made in relation to goodwill, with any impairment loss measured as the amount by which the carrying value of such goodwill exceeds the expected undiscounted future cash flows.
F-9
DCAP GROUP, INC. AND
SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Financial Statements
Years Ended December 31, 2008 and 2007

Income taxes - - Deferred tax assets and liabilities are determined based upon the differences between financial reporting and tax bases of assets and liabilities, and are measured using the enacted tax rates and laws that will be in effect when the differences are expected to reverse.

In July 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Interpretation No. 48, "Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes," (“FIN 48”). This interpretation, among other things, creates a two-step approach for evaluating uncertain tax positions. Recognition (step one) occurs when an enterprise concludes that a tax position, based solely on its technical merits, is more-likely-than-not to be sustained upon examination. Measurement (step two) determines the amount of benefit that more-likely-than-not will be realized upon settlement. Derecognition of a tax position that was previously recognized would occur when a company subsequently determines that a tax position no longer meets the more-likely-than-not threshold of being sustained. FIN 48 specifically prohibits the use of a valuation allowance as a substitute for derecognition of tax positions, and it has expanded disclosure requirements. The adoption of FIN 48 had no impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

Share-based compensation - We recordCompany records compensation expense associated with stock options and other equity-based compensation in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 123 (revised 2004), “Share-Based Payment” (“SFAS 123(R)”).guidance established by GAAP. In addition, we adherethe Company adheres to the guidance set forth within  Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) Staff Accounting Bulletin (“SAB”) No. 107, which provides the Staff's views regarding the interaction between SFAS 123(R)GAAP standards and certain SEC rules and regulations and provides interpretations with respect to the valuation of share-based payments for public companies. Stock option compensation expense in 20082009 and 20072008 is the estimated fair value of options granted amortized on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period for entire portion of the award less an estimate for anticipated forfeitures.

Website development costs - Technology and content costs are generally expensed as incurred, except for certain costs relating to the development of internal-use software, including those relating to operating our website, that are capitalized and depreciated over two years. A total of approximately $3,000 and $53,000 in such costs were incurred during the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively.Comprehensive Income

Comprehensive income (loss) - Comprehensive income (loss) refers to revenue, expenses, gains and losses that under generally accepted accounting principlesGAAP are included in comprehensive income but are excluded from net income as these amounts are recorded directly as an adjustment to stockholders' equity. At December 31, 2008 and 2007, there were no such adjustments required.

New accounting pronouncementsAccounting Pronouncements

Accounting guidance adopted in 2009

In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 141R “Business Combinations” (“SFAS 141R”). SFAS 141Rnew guidance related to business combinations. This guidance establishes principles and requirements for how the acquirer of a business recognizes and measures in its financial statements the identifiable assets acquired, the liabilities assumed, and any noncontrolling interest in the acquiree. SFAS 141RIn addition, transaction costs are no longer included in the measurement of the business acquired, but are expensed as incurred. This guidance also provides guidance for recognizing and measuring the goodwill acquired in the business combination and determines what information to disclose to enable users of the financial statements to evaluate the nature and financial effects of the business combination.  SFAS 141R isThis guidance was effective for ourthe Company’s fiscal year beginning January 1, 2009. We are in&# 160;As a result of the processacquisition of evaluatingKICO on July 1, 2009, the adoption of this statement forguidance has had a material impact on the impact, if any, that SFAS 141R will have on ourCompany’s consolidated financial position and results of operations.

F-10
DCAP GROUP, INC. AND
SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Financial Statements
Years Ended December 31, 2008 and 2007
In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157, "Fair Value Measurements." SFAS No. 157 defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value and expands disclosure requirements about fair value measurements. SFAS No. 157 was effective for us on January 1, 2008. However, in February 2008, the FASB released FASB Staff Position (FSP FAS 157-2 — Effective Date of FASB Statement No. 157), which delayed the effective date of SFAS No. 157the guidance regarding fair value measurements for allcertain nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial liabilities except those that are recognized or disclosed at fair value inand associated required disclosures. On January 1, 2009 the financial statements on a recurring basis (at least annually). The adoption of SFAS No. 157 for our financial assetsguidance became effective and liabilities did not have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements. We do not believe the adoption of SFAS No. 157 for ourCompany applied the guidance to the nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial liabilities effective January 1, 2009, will have awith no material impact on our consolidated financial statements.effect.

In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159, "The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities" ("SFAS 159"). SFAS 159 permits companies to choose to measure many financial instruments and certain other items at fair value. The objective is to improve financial reporting by providing companies with the opportunity to mitigate volatility in reported earnings caused by measuring related assets and liabilities differently without having to apply complex hedge accounting provisions. SFAS 159 is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007. Companies are not allowed to adopt SFAS 159 on a retrospective basis unless they choose early adoption. We adopted SFAS 159 in 2008, and did not elect the fair value option for eligible items that existed at the date of adoption.

In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 160, “Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements, an amendment of ARB No. 51” (“SFAS 160”). The new standard changes the accounting and reporting of noncontrolling interests, which have historically been referred to as minority interests. SFAS 160 requires that noncontrolling interests be presented in the consolidated balance sheets within shareholders’ equity, but separate from the parent’s equity, and that the amount of consolidated net income attributable to the parent and to the noncontrolling interest be clearly identified and presented in the consolidated statements of income. Any losses in excess of the noncontrolling interest’s equity interest will continue to be allocated to the noncontrolling interest. Purchases or sales of equity interests that do not result in a change of control will be accounted for as equity transactions. Upon a loss of control, the interest sold, as well as any interest retained, will be measured at fair value, with any gain or loss recognized in earnings. In partial acquisitions, when control is obtained, the acquiring company will recognize, at fair value, 100% of the assets and liabilities, including goodwill, as if the entire target company had been acquired. SFAS 160 is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning on or after December 15, 2008, with early adoption prohibited. The new standard will be applied prospectively, except for the presentation and disclosure requirements, which will be applied retrospectively for all periods presented. We have not yet determined the impact, if any, that this statement will have on our consolidated financial statements and we will adopt the standard at the beginning of fiscal 2009.

In March 2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 161, “Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities—an amendment of FASB Statement No. 133” (“SFAS 161”). SFAS 161 applies to all entities.  SFAS 161 changes the disclosure requirements for derivative instruments and hedging activities. Entities are required to provide enhanced disclosures about (a) how and why an entity uses derivative instruments, (b) how derivative instruments and related hedged items are accounted for under SFAS No. 133 and its related interpretations, and (c) how derivative instruments and related hedged items affect an entity’s financial position, financial performance, and cash flows.  SFAS 161 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after November 15, 2008, with early application encouraged.  SFAS 161 encourages, but does not require, comparative disclosures for earlier periods at initial adoption. We are currently evaluating this statement for the impact, if any, that SFAS 161 will have on our consolidated financial position and results of operations.
F-11
DCAP GROUP, INC. AND
SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Financial Statements
Years Ended December 31, 2008 and 2007
In April 2008, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position ("FSP") No. 142-3, "Determinationnew guidance in determining the useful life of a recognized intangible asset. The purpose of this guidance is to improve consistency between the Useful Lifeuseful life of Intangible Assets" ("FSP 142-3"). FSP 142-3 removes the requirement under SFAS 142 to consider whether an intangible asset can be renewed without substantial costand the period of material modificationsexpected cash flows used to measure the existing terms and conditions, and replaces it with a requirement thatfair value of the asset for purposes of determining possible impairments. This guidance requires an entity consider its own historical experience in renewing similar arrangements, or a consideration of market participant assumptions in the absence of historical experience. This FSP also requires entities to disclose information that enables users of financial statementsrelated to assess the extent to which the expected future cash flows associated with the asset are affected by the entity'sentity’s intent and/or ability to renew or extend the arrangement. This guidance is required to be applied prospectively to all new intangible assets acquired after January 1, 2009. The Company prospectively adopted the new guidance will become effective as ofon January 1, 2009, with no material effect on the beginning of the Company's fiscal year beginning after December 15, 2008. We are currently evaluating the impact this standard will have on our financial statements.

F-15

In June 2008, the FASB ratified Emerging Issues Task Forceissued new guidance related to earnings per share (“EITF”EPS”) No. 07-5, "Determining Whether an Instrument (or an Embedded Feature) Is Indexedcalculations and the participating securities in the basic earnings per share calculation under the two-class method. This new guidance requires that unvested share-based payment awards that contain nonforfeitable rights to an Entity's Own Stock" ("EITF 07-5"). EITF 07-5 provides that an entity should use a two-step approachdividends or dividend equivalents (whether paid or unpaid) are participating securities and shall be included in the computation of EPS pursuant to evaluate whether an equity-linked financial instrument (or embedded feature) is indexed to its own stock, including evaluating the instrument's contingent exercise and settlement provisions. EITF 07-5two-class method. This guidance is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008.2008, and interim periods within those years. All prior-period EPS data presented shall be adjusted retrospectively (including interim financial statements, summaries of earnings, and selected financial data) to conform to the guidance. Early application isad option was not permitted. We are assessingThe Company adopted the potential impact of this EITFguidance on our financial condition and results of operations.

In June 2008, the FASB issued FSP EITF 03-6-1, “Determining Whether Instruments Granted in Share-Based Payment Transactions Are Participating Securities.” This FSP clarifies that all outstanding unvested share-based payment awards that contain rights to non-forfeitable dividends participate in undistributed earnings with common shareholders. Awards of this nature are considered participating securities and the two-class method of computing basic and diluted earnings per share must be applied. This FSP is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008. We are currently evaluating the potential impact, if any, the new pronouncement will have on our consolidated financial statements.

In October 2008, the FASB issued FSP FAS No. 157-3, "Determining the Fair Value of a Financial Asset When the Market for That Is Asset Not Active" ("FAS 157-3") with an immediate effective date, including prior periods forJanuary 1, 2009, which financial statements have not been issued. FAS 157-3 clarifies the application of fair value in inactive markets and allows for the use of management's internal assumptions about future cash flows with appropriately risk-adjusted discount rates when relevant observable market data does not exist. The objective of FAS 157 has not changed and continues to be the determination of the price that would be received in an orderly transaction that is not a forced liquidation or distressed sale at the measurement date. The adoption of FAS 157-3 did not have a material effect on the Company'sCompany’s earnings per share.

In April, 2009, the FASB issued new guidance to help an entity in determining whether a market for an asset is not active and when a price for a transaction is not distressed. The model includes the following two steps:

Determine whether there are factors present that indicate that the market for the asset is not active at the measurement date; and
Evaluate the quoted price (i.e., a recent transaction or broker price quotation) to determine whether the quoted price is not associated with a distressed transaction.

This guidance is effective for interim and annual periods ending after June 15, 2009, with early adoption permitted for periods ending after March 15, 2009. The Company adopted the new provisions on January 1, 2009. The adoption did not have a material effect on the Company’s consolidated financial condition and results of operations.

In April 2009, the FASB issued new guidance for other-than-temporary impairments (“OTTI”) for fixed-maturity securities. Subsequent to this guidance, companies are required to separate OTTI into (a) the amount representing the credit loss, which continues to be recorded in earnings, and (b) the amount related to all other factors, which is now recorded in other comprehensive net income/loss. The new guidance required a cumulative-effect adjustment for those securities that were other-than-temporarily-impaired at the effective date. This cumulative-effect adjustment reclassifies the noncredit portion of previously other-than-temporarily-impaired instrument held at the effective date to accumulated other comprehensive net income/loss from retained earnings. Early adoption was permitted for periods ending after March 15, 2009. The Company adopted the guidance on January 1, 2009. The adoption did not have a material effect on the Company’s consolidated financial condition and results of operations.

In April, 2009, the FASB issued new guidance regarding requirements for disclosures relating to fair value of financial instruments. This guidance specifies that for reporting periods ended after June 15, 2009, all interim, as well as annual, financial statements must contain the additional disclosures regarding fair value of financial instruments. Early adoption was permitted for periods ending after March 15, 2009. The Company adopted this guidance on January 1, 2009, with no material effect on the financial statements.

In May 2009, the FASB issued new guidance requiring entities to disclose the date through which they have evaluated subsequent events and whether the date corresponds with the release of their financial statements. The Company implemented this guidance as of April 1, 2009 with no material effect on Company’s consolidated financial condition and results of operations.

F-16

In June 2009, the FASB issued guidance establishing a new hierarchy of generally accepted accounting principles called “FASB Accounting Standards Codification”. The new hierarchy is the new single source of authoritative nongovernmental U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. The codification reorganizes the thousands of GAAP pronouncements into roughly 90 accounting topics and displays them using a consistent structure. Also included is relevant Securities and Exchange Commission guidance organized using the same topical structure in separate sections. Effective for interim and annual periods that end after September 15, 2009, the Company implemented this guidance as of July 1, 2009 and has removed all references to prior authoritative literature.
In August 2009, the FASB issued new guidance concerning the fair value measurement of liabilities. This new guidance provides clarification that in circumstances in which a quoted price in an active market for the identical liability is not available, fair value can be measured using a valuation technique that uses the quoted price of the identical liability when traded as an asset (Level 1) or similar liability when traded as an asset (Level 2) or another valuation technique that is consistent with the principles of fair value. Under this guidance, a company is not required to make an adjustment to reflect the existence of a restriction that prevents the transfer of the liability. This guidance is effective for interim and annual periods beginning after August 2009. The Company is currently analyzing the effect this guidance will have on its financial statements. The Company implemented this guidance as of October 1, 2009 with no material effect on Company’s consolidated financial condition and results of operations.

Accounting guidance not yet effective

In June 2009, the FASB issued new guidance which requires more information about transfers of financial assets, including securitization transactions, and where entities have continuing exposure to the risks related to transferred financial assets. This guidance eliminates the concept of a “qualifying special-purpose entity,” changes the requirements for derecognizing financial assets, and requires additional disclosures. The new guidance enhances information reported to users of financial statements by providing greater transparency about transfers of financial assets and an entity’s continuing involvement in transferred financial assets. This guidance will be effective for annual reporting periods beginning on or after January 1, 2010. Early application is not permitted. The Company is currently analyzing the effect this guidance will have on its financial statements.

In June 2009, the FASB issued new guidance which concerns the consolidation of variable interest entities and changes how a reporting entity determines when an entity that is insufficiently capitalized or is not controlled through voting (or similar rights) should be consolidated. The determination of whether a reporting entity is required to consolidate another entity is based on, among other things, the other entity’s purpose and design and the reporting entity’s ability to direct the activities of the other entity that most significantly affect the other entity’s economic performance. The new guidance will require a reporting entity to provide additional disclosures about its involvement with variable interest entities and any significant changes in risk exposure due to that involvement. A reporting entity wil l be required to disclose how its involvement with a variable interest entity affects the reporting entity’s financial statements. This guidance will be effective for annual reporting periods beginning on or after January 1, 2010. Early application is not permitted. The Company is currently analyzing the effect this guidance will have on its financial statements.

In January 2010, the FASB issued new guidance that requires additional disclosure of the fair value of assets and liabilities. This guidance calls for additional disclosures to be made about significant transfers in and out of Levels 1 and 2 of the fair value hierarchy within GAAP. This requirement will be effective for annual and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2009. This guidance also calls for additional disclosure about the gross activity within Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy within GAAP as opposed to the net disclosure currently required. This disclosure will be effective for annual and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2010. As this guidance relates to disclosure rather than measurement of assets and liabilities, there will be no effect on the financial results or position of the Compan y. The Company will comply with the disclosure requirements as they become effective.

F-17

Note 3 - Acquisition of Kingstone Insurance Company
On July 1, 2009, Kingstone completed the acquisition of 100% of the issued and outstanding common stock of Kingstone Insurance Company (“KICO”) (formerly known as Commercial Mutual Insurance Company (“CMIC”)), pursuant to the conversion of CMIC from an advance premium cooperative to a stock property and casualty insurance company.  The total purchase price was $5,996,461.

As of June 30, 2009, Kingstone held two surplus notes issued by CMIC in the aggregate principal amount of $3,750,000. Previously accrued and unpaid interest on the notes as of June 30, 2009 was approximately $2,246,000. Pursuant to the plan of conversion, effective July 1, 2009, Kingstone acquired a 100% equity interest in KICO in consideration of the exchange of the principal amount of surplus notes of CMIC. In addition, Kingstone forgave all accrued and unpaid interest on the surplus notes as of the date of conversion. The transaction was considered a bargain purchase, resulting in a gain on acquisition. The fair value of the CMIC acquisition is presented as follows:
 Exchange of principal amount of surplus notes of CMIC $3,750,000 
 Accrued interest forgiven  2,246,461 
 Total purchase consideration  5,996,461 
 Gain on acquisition (bargain purchase)  5,177,851 
 Fair value of KICO at acquisition, net of deferred taxes* $11,174,312 
* The Company accounted for this transaction under GAAP guidance related to business combinations that became effective in 2009 (See Note 2, Accounting Policies and Basis of Presentation, Recent Accounting Pronouncements). Under this guidance, when a transaction meets the criteria of a “bargain purchase” goodwill is not recognized. Accordingly, the fair value of KICO at acquisition only includes identifiable assets.

KICO offers property and casualty insurance products to small businesses and individuals in New York State. KICO’s subsidiaries include CMIC Properties, Inc. (“CMIC Properties”) and 15 Joys Lane, LLC (“15 Joys Lane”), which owns the land and building from which KICO operates.

The Company began consolidating KICO’s financial statements as of the closing date in accordance with GAAP. The purchase consideration has been allocated to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed, including separately identified intangible assets, based on their fair values as of the close of the acquisition.
The following unaudited condensed balance sheet presents assets acquired and liabilities assumed with the acquisition of KICO, based on their fair values and the fair value hierarchy level under GAAP as of July 1, 2009:

F-18

  Level 1  Level 2  Level 3  Total 
 Assets
            
 Short term investments $811,738  $-  $-  $811,738 
 Fixed-maturity securities  9,266,253   -   -   9,266,253 
 Equity securities  1,823,045   -   -   1,823,045 
 Total investments  11,901,036   -   -   11,901,036 
 Cash and cash equivalents  1,327,057   -   -   1,327,057 
 Investment income receivable  70,216   -   -   70,216 
 Premiums receivable, net of of provision for                
 uncollectible amounts  -   -   4,756,148   4,756,148 
 Receivables - reinsurance contracts  -   -   1,137,832   1,137,832 
 Reinsurance receivables, net of provision for                
 uncollectible amounts  -   -   19,949,199   19,949,199 
 Deferred acquisition costs  -   -   2,665,802   2,665,802 
 Intangible assets  -   -   4,850,000   4,850,000 
 Property and equipment, net of accumulated depreciation  -   -   1,658,493   1,658,493 
 Other assets  -   -   531,991   531,991 
 Total assets
 $13,298,309  $-  $35,549,465  $48,847,774 
                 
 Liabilities
                
 Loss and loss adjustment expenses $-  $-  $16,431,191  $16,431,191 
 Unearned premiums  -   -   13,879,374   13,879,374 
 Advance premiums  -   -   338,054   338,054 
 Reinsurance balances payable  -   -   2,005,590   2,005,590 
 Deferred ceding commission revenue  -   -   2,700,376   2,700,376 
 Accounts payable, accrued liabilities and other liabilities  -   -   1,157,829   1,157,829 
 Deferred income taxes  -   -   1,156,054   1,156,054 
 Other liabilities  -   -   4,994   4,994 
 Total liabilities
  -   -   37,673,462   37,673,462 
 Stockholder's equity              11,174,312 
 Total liabilities and stockholder's equity             $48,847,774 

The fair values of separately identifiable intangibles and fixed assets were based on independent appraisals. The values of certain assets and liabilities may be subject to change as additional information is obtained. The valuations will be finalized within the measurement period, generally defined as 12 months from the close of the acquisition. When the valuations are finalized, any changes to the preliminary valuation of assets acquired or liabilities assumed may result in adjustments to the bargain purchase price. During the fourth quarter of 2009, the preliminary valuation of loss and loss adjustment expenses was increased by $239,407 and the reserve for reinsurance receivables was increased by $100,000, resulting in a decrease to the net assets acquired. The aggregate purchase price of $5,996,461 was less than the $11,174,31 2 fair value of KICO’s net assets acquired, resulting in a bargain purchase of $5,177,851. The purchase price was determined in CMIC’s plan of conversion, which was equal to the current value of the surplus notes and accrued interest on the effective date of conversion. Transaction costs related to the acquisition were expensed as incurred. Transaction costs for the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008 were $210,430 and $32,896, respectively.


F-19


Allocation of Purchase Price (a):
Purchase Price    $5,996,461 
        
Book value of CMIC at June 30, 2009     1,786,162 
Conversion of surplus notes and accrued interest thereon to common stock     5,996,461 
Fair value adjustments, net of taxes based on appraisal       
of CMIC's identifiable assets at June 30, 2009:       
Insurance license $500,000     
Customer relationships  3,400,000     
Assembled workforce  950,000     
Total intangible assets  4,850,000     
Real estate assets  288,923     
Identifiable assets  5,138,923     
Tax effect  (1,747,234)    
Fair value adjustments, net of taxes based on appraisal        
of CMIC's identifiable assets at June 30, 2009      3,391,689 
Fair value of net assets acquired, net of taxes      11,174,312 
         
Excess of fair value of assets acquied over purchase price (bargain purchase price)     $(5,177,851)

(a)The purchase price is allocated to balance sheet assets acquired (including identifiable intangible assets arising from the acquisition) and liabilities assumed based on their estimated fair value.

The Company included total revenues and net income for KICO from the acquisition date of July 1, 2009 through December 31, 2009 in its consolidated statement of operations as follows:
 Total revenue $7,066,470 
 Net income  516,697 
Intangibles

The fair value of intangible assets represent customer and producer relationships, assembled workforce and insurance license. The fair value of customer and producer relationships was estimated based upon using a discounted cash flow approach methodology. The fair value of the assembled workforce was valued using cost of workforce replacement and the cost of loss of efficiency methodology. The fair value of the insurance license was valued using a market approach methodology. Critical inputs into the valuation model for customer relationships included estimations of expected premium and attrition rates, expected operating margins and capital requirements (See Note 7).

Real Estate

The fair value of the land and building included in property and equipment, which is used in the Company’s operations is greater than the carrying value. The fair value was based on an appraisal dated August 31, 2009.

Loss and Loss Adjustment Expense Reserves Acquired
Loss and Loss Adjustment Expense Reserves Acquired were valued at fair value which approximated carrying value.

F-20

Non-financial Assets and Liabilities

Receivables, other assets and liabilities were valued at fair value which approximated carrying value.

Pro Forma Results of Operations

Selected unaudited pro forma results of operations assuming the KICO acquisition had occurred as of January 1, 2008, are set forth below:
Years ended December 31, 2009  2008 
  (unaudited)  (unaudited) 
Total revenue $13,280,878  $12,296,307 
Income from continuing operations $757,545  $498,161 
Net income (loss) $517,222  $(144,282)
         
Basic and diluted earnings (loss) per common share:        
Income from continuing operations $0.25  $0.17 
Net income (loss) $0.17  $(0.05)
         
Basic and diluted weighted average common shares outstanding  2,974,349   2,972,547 
Note:
The Company excluded certain one-time charges from the pro forma results for the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008 including, (i) transaction costs of $240,016 and $62,482, respectively, related to the acquisition of KICO, and (ii) Kingstone’s gain of $5,177,851 related to the acquisition of KICO for the year ended December 31, 2009.

Note 4 - Investments 

The amortized cost and fair value of investments in fixed-maturity securities and equities as of December 31, 2009 are summarized as follows:
   Cost or  Gross  Gross Unrealized Losses     Unrealized 
  Amortized  Unrealized  Less than 12  More than 12  Fair  Gains/ 
 Category
 
Cost (a)
  Gains  Months  Months  Value  
(Losses)
 
                   
 Fixed-Maturity Securities:                  
 U.S. Treasury securities and                  
 obligations of U.S. government                  
 corporations and agencies $3,549,616  $38,790  $(23,929) $-  $3,564,477  $14,861 
                         
 Political subdivisions of States,                        
 Territories and Possessions  5,751,979   82,480   (12,356)  -   5,822,103   70,124 
                         
 Corporate and other bonds                        
 Industrial and miscellaneous  3,375,272   54,384   (25,156)  -   3,404,500   29,228 
 Total fixed-maturity securities  12,676,867   175,654   (61,441)  -   12,791,080   114,213 
                         
 Equity Securities:                        
 Preferred stocks  716,903   33,661   (5,564)  -   745,000   28,097 
 Common stocks  1,256,835   191,075   (5,984)  -   1,441,926   185,091 
 Total equity securities  1,973,738   224,736   (11,548)  -   2,186,926   213,188 
                         
 Short term investments  225,336   -   -   -   225,336   - 
                         
 Total $14,875,941  $400,390  $(72,989) $-  $15,203,342  $327,401 
(a) The cost or amortized cost of securities acquired in the KICO acquisition are equal to their fair value as of the July 1, 2009 acquisition date.
F-21

A summary of the amortized cost and fair value of the Company’s investments in fixed-maturity securities by contractual maturity as of December 31, 2009 is shown below:
  Amortized    
 Remaining Time to Maturity
 Cost  Fair Value 
       
 Less than one year $1,190,319  $1,176,050 
 One to five years  5,202,936   5,260,443 
 Five to ten years  4,945,787   4,986,236 
 More than 10 years  1,337,825   1,368,351 
 Total $12,676,867  $12,791,080 

The actual maturities may differ from contractual maturities because certain borrowers have the right to call or prepay obligations with or without penalties.

Major categories of the Company’s net investment income from July 1, 2009 (date of KICO acquisition) through December 31, 2009 are summarized as follows:
 Income   
 Fixed-maturity securities $214,499 
 Equity securities  45,552 
 Cash and cash equivalents  25,654 
 Other  7,231 
 Total  292,936 
 Expenses    
 Investment expenses  67,260 
 Net investment income $225,676 
     
Proceeds from the sale and maturity of fixed-maturity securities were $2,735,777 for the period from July 1, 2009 (date of KICO acquisition) through December 31, 2009.

Proceeds from the sale of equity securities were $1,533,552 for the period from July 1, 2009 (date of KICO acquisition) through December 31, 2009.

The Company’s gross realized gains and losses on investments for the period from July 1, 2009 (date of KICO acquisition) through December 31, 2009 are summarized as follows:
 Fixed-maturity securities   
 Gross realized gains $110,357 
 Gross realized losses  (4,799)
   105,558 
     
 Equity securities    
 Gross realized gains  109,965 
 Gross realized losses  - 
   109,965 
     
Other-than-temporary impairment losses 
 Fixed-maturity securities  - 
 Equity securities  - 
 Cash and short term investments  (246,151)
   (246,151)
     
 Net realized gains (losses) $(30,628)

F-22

Impairment Review
The Company regularly reviews its fixed-maturity securities and equity securities portfolios to evaluate the necessity of recording impairment losses for other-than-temporary declines in the fair value of investments. In evaluating potential impairment, management considers, among other criteria: (i) the current fair value compared to amortized cost or cost, as appropriate; (ii) the length of time the security’s fair value has been below amortized cost or cost; (iii) specific credit issues related to the issuer such as changes in credit rating, reduction or elimination of dividends or non-payment of scheduled interest payments; (iv) management’s intent and ability to retain the investment for a period of time sufficient to allow for any anticipated recovery in value to cost; and (v) current economic conditions.
OTTI losses are recorded in the consolidated statement of operations as net realized losses on investments and result in a permanent reduction of the cost basis of the underlying investment. The determination of OTTI is a subjective process and different judgments and assumptions could affect the timing of loss realization. In March 2010, the Company was notified by the FDIC that a bank in which the Company had deposits totaling approximately $497,000 had failed. As of December 31, 2009, account balances at the failed bank consisted of a $100,000 certificate of deposit and a money market account with a balance of $396,151. For the year ended December 31, 2009, the loss in excess of FDIC insured limits was $246,151. Accordingly, the Company recorded OTTI of $246,151 for the year ended December 31, 2009. The Company determined there was no OTTI for its portfolio of fixed maturity investments and equity securities for the year ended December 31, 2009.  Significant factors influencing the Company’s determination that unrealized losses were temporary included the magnitude of the unrealized losses in relation to each security’s cost, the nature of the investment and management’s intent and ability to retain the investment for a period of time sufficient to allow for anticipated recovery of fair value to the Company’s cost basis.

The Company held securities with unrealized losses representing declines that were considered temporary at December 31, 2009 as follows:
  Less than 12 months  12 months or more  Total 
   Fair  Unrealized  Fair  Unrealized  Fair  Unrealized 
 Category
 Value  Losses  Value  Losses  Value  Losses 
                   
 Fixed-Maturity Securities:                  
 U.S. Treasury securities and                  
 obligations of U.S. government                  
 corporations and agencies $1,715,062  $(23,929) $-  $-  $1,715,062  $(23,929)
                         
 Political subdivisions of States,                        
 Territories and Possessions  1,357,203   (12,356)  -   -   1,357,203   (12,356)
                         
 Corporate and other bonds                        
 Industrial and miscellaneous  1,376,516   (25,156)  -   -   1,376,516   (25,156)
 Total fixed-maturity securities  4,448,781   (61,441)  -   -   4,448,781   (61,441)
                         
 Equity Securities:                        
 Preferred stocks $144,900  $(5,564) $-  $-  $144,900  $(5,564)
 Common stocks  94,470   (5,984)  -   -   94,470   (5,984)
 Total equity securities  239,370   (11,548)  -   -   239,370   (11,548)
                         
 Total $4,688,151  $(72,989) $-  $-  $4,688,151  $(72,989)

F-23

Note 5 - Fair Value Measurements

The Company follows GAAP guidance regarding fair value measurements. The valuation technique used to fair value the financial positioninstruments is the market approach which uses prices and other relevant information generated by market transactions involving identical or liquidity.comparable assets.
This guidance establishes a three-level hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value. The fair value hierarchy gives the highest priority to quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (Level 1) and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs (Level 3). If the inputs used to measure the assets or liabilities fall within different levels of the hierarchy, the classification is based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement of the asset or liability. Classification of assets and liabilities within the hierarchy considers the markets in which the assets and liabilities are traded, including during period of market disruption, and the reliability and transparency of the assumptions used to determine fair value. The hierarchy requires the use of observable market data when available. The levels of the hierarchy and those investments included in each are as follows:
Level 1—Inputs to the valuation methodology are quoted prices (unadjusted) for identical assets or liabilities traded in active markets. Included are those investments traded on an active exchange, such as the NASDAQ Global Select Market, U.S. Treasury securities and obligations of U.S. government agencies, together with municipal bonds, corporate debt securities that are generally investment grade.
Level 2—Inputs to the valuation methodology include quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets, quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active, inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability and market-corroborated inputs.
Level 3—Inputs to the valuation methodology are unobservable for the asset or liability and are significant to the fair value measurement. Material assumptions and factors considered in pricing investment securities and other assets may include appraisals, projected cash flows, market clearing activity or liquidity circumstances in the security or similar securities that may have occurred since the prior pricing period. Included in this valuation methodology are the real estate assets owned by the Company that are utilized in its operations.
The availability of observable inputs varies and is affected by a wide variety of factors. When the valuation is based on models or inputs that are less observable or unobservable in the market, the determination of fair value requires significantly more judgment. The degree of judgment exercised by management in determining fair value is greatest for investments categorized as Level 3. For investments in this category, the Company considers prices and inputs that are current as of the measurement date. In periods of market dislocation, as characterized by current market conditions, the observability of prices and inputs may be reduced for many instruments. This condition could cause a security to be reclassified between levels.
The Company’s investments are allocated among pricing input levels at December 31, 2009 as follows:

F-24

 ($ in thousands)
 Level 1  Level 2  Level 3  Total 
             
 Fixed-maturity investments            
 U.S. Treasury securities            
 and obligations of U.S.            
 government corporations            
 and agencies $3,564  $-  $-  $3,564 
                 
 Political subdivisions of                
 States, Territories and                
 Possessions  5,822   -   -   5,822 
                 
 Corporate and                
 other bonds  3,405   -   -   3,405 
                 
 Total fixed maturities  12,791   -   -   12,791 
 Equity investments  2,187   -   -   2,187 
 Short term investments  225           225 
 Total investments $15,203  $-  $-  $15,203 

Note 6 - Fair Value of Financial Instruments

GAAP requires all entities to disclose the fair value of financial instruments, both assets and liabilities recognized and not recognized in the balance sheet, for which it is practicable to estimate fair value. The company uses the following methods and assumptions in estimating its fair value disclosures for financial instruments:
Equity and fixed income investments:  Fair value disclosures for investments are included in “Note 4 - Investments.”

Cash and short-term investments: The carrying values of cash and cash equivalents, and short-term investments approximate their fair values because of the short maturity of these investments.

3. Notes Receivable
Premiums receivable, reinsurance receivables:  The carrying values reported in the accompanying balance sheets for these financial instruments approximate their fair values due to the short term nature of the assets.

Notes receivable: The carrying amount of notes receivable related to the sale of businesses approximates fair value because of the recently negotiated interest rates based on term of the loan, risk and guaranty. For “Notes receivable – Commercial Mutual Insurance Company” (now known as Kingstone Insurance Company or “KICO”), we acquired a 100% equity interest in KICO on July 1, 2009 in exchange for our relinquishing our rights to any unpaid principal and interest under the notes receivable. The fair value of KICO is based on an appraisal completed in November 2009 which was used to determine the fair value of KICO in connection with the acquisition on July 1, 2009. The ap praisal was based on the discounted cash flow analysis of KICO���s book of business and a workforce assembly cost analysis. The value of KICO’s insurance license was based on industry standards.

Real Estate Assets: The fair value of the land and building included in property and equipment, which is used in the Company’s operations, approximates the carrying value. The fair value was based on an appraisal dated August 31, 2009. The appraisal was prepared using the sales comparison approach.

Reinsurance balances payable:  The carrying value reported in the balance sheet for these financial instruments approximates fair value.

F-25

Long-term debt and mandatorily redeemable preferred stock: For fair value of long-term debt and mandatorily redeemable preferred stock for which there are no quoted market prices, we estimate that the carrying amount of notes payable and mandatorily redeemable preferred stock approximates fair value because of the recently negotiated interest rates based on term of the loan, risk and guaranty.
The estimated fair values of our financial instruments are as follows:
  December 31, 2009  December 31, 2008 
  Carrying Value  Fair Value  Carrying Value  Fair Value 
             
 Cash and short-term investments $850,656  $850,656  $142,949  $142,949 
 Premiums receivable  4,479,363   4,479,363   -   - 
 Receivables - reinsurance contracts  564,408   564,408   -   - 
 Reinsurance receivables  20,849,621   20,849,621   -   - 
 Notes receivable-CMIC  -   -   5,935,704   5,935,704 
 Notes receivable-sale of business  1,119,365   1,119,365   -   - 
 Real estate, net of      -         
 accumulated depreciation  1,490,926   1,510,000   -   - 
 Reinsurance balances payable  1,918,169   1,918,169   -   - 
 Notes payable  1,085,637   1,085,637   2,008,828   2,008,828 
 Mandatorily redeemable preferred stock  1,299,231   1,299,231   780,000   780,000 

Note 7 - Intangibles

Intangible assets consist of finite and indefinite life assets. Finite life intangible assets include customer and producer relationships and assembled workforce. Insurance company license is considered indefinite life intangible assets subject to annual impairment testing. The weighted average amortization period of identified intangible assets of finite useful life is 8.9 years as of December 31, 2009.
With the acquisition of KICO on July 1, 2009, the Company recognized $4,850,000 of identifiable intangible assets including KICO’s customer and producer relationships of $3,400,000, assembled workforce of $950,000 and insurance company license of $500,000. The customer and producer relationships and assembled workforce acquired are finite lived assets that will be amortized over ten and seven years, respectively, and are subject to annual impairment testing. The insurance company license is included as indefinite lived intangibles subject to annual impairment testing.
The components of intangible assets are summarized as follows:
     December 31, 2009  December 31, 2008 
  Useful  Gross     Net  Gross     Net 
  Life  Carrying  Accumulated  Carrying  Carrying  Accumulated  Carrying 
  (in yrs)  Value  Amortization  Amount  Value  Amortization  Amount 
 Insurance license  -  $500,000  $-  $500,000  $-  $-  $- 
 Customer relationships  10   3,400,000   170,000   3,230,000   -   -   - 
 Assembled workforce  7   950,000   67,900   882,100   -   -   - 
 Total     $4,850,000  $237,900  $4,612,100  $-  $-  $- 
During the period from July 1, 2009 (date of KICO acquisition) through December 31, 2009, the Company recorded amortization expense, related to intangibles, of $237,900. The estimated aggregate amortization expense for the remainder of the current year and each of the next five years is:

F-26


2010 $475,714 
2011  475,714 
2012  475,714 
2013  475,714 
2014  475,714 
Note 8 - Reinsurance

Personal Lines

Personal Lines business, which primarily consists of homeowners’ policies, is reinsured under a 75% quota share treaty which provides coverage up to $700,000 per occurrence. For treaty year ended June 30, 2010, an excess of loss contract provides $1,200,000 in coverage excess of the $700,000 for a total coverage of $1,900,000 per occurrence. A total of $29 million of catastrophe coverage has been provided, where the  Company retains $500,000 of risk.

Commercial Lines

Commercial Automobile - For policies with an effective date prior to 2010, the Company, pursuant to a 50% quota share treaty, retains 50% of the first $300,000 of loss, or a maximum loss per incident of $150,000.  In addition, the Company has purchased excess of loss coverage to provide for coverage of up to $2,000,000 per loss.  Beginning with policies with an effective date in 2010, where the Company does not have a quota share treaty, the Company retains the first $200,000 of loss, and has purchased excess of loss coverage for losses up to $2,000,000

Commercial Lines business other than auto - Policies written by the Company are reinsured under an 85% quota share treaty, expiring June 30, 2010.  Personal Umbrella business written is reinsured under a 90% quota share limiting the Company to a maximum of $100,000 per risk. 

Quota Share, Excess of Loss and Catastrophe Reinsurance Agreements

Through quota share, excess of loss and catastrophe reinsurance agreements, the Company limits its exposure to a maximum loss on any one risk as follows:
F-27

 Maximum
 Loss
 Line of business Exposure
 Casualty and property (personal lines)
 July 1, 2006 - June 30, 2010 $         175,000
 July 1, 2005 - June 30, 2006 $         140,000
 July 1, 2003 - June 30, 2005 $           75,000
 July 1, 2002 - June 30, 2003 $         100,000
 Basic auto physical damage
 January 1, 2006 - December 31, 2010 100% of covered loss
 October 1, 2003 - December 31, 2005 40% of covered loss
 Private passenger auto
 July 1, 2007 - December 31, 2008 25% of covered loss
 Casualty and property (commercial lines)
 November 1, 2008 - June 30, 2010 15% of covered loss
 October 1, 2002 - December 31, 2003 $         100,000
 July 1, 1999 - October 1, 2002 $           25,000
 Commercial auto liability
 January 1, 2010 - December 31, 2011 $         200,000
 January 1, 2005 - December 31, 2009 $         150,000
 January 1, 2004 - December 31, 2004 $         120,000
 January 1, 2002 - December 31, 2003 $         100,000
 Commercial auto physical damage
 January 1, 2010 - December 31, 2010 $           75,000
 January 1, 2007 - December 31, 2009 $           37,500
 January 1, 2004 - December 31, 2006 $           30,000
 January 1, 2002 - December 31, 2003 $           75,000
The Company’s reinsurance program is structured to enable it to reflect significant reductions in premiums written and earned and also provides income as a result of ceding commissions earned pursuant to the quota share reinsurance contracts. This structure has enabled the Company to significantly grow its premium volume while maintaining regulatory capital and other financial ratios generally within or below the expected ranges used for regulatory oversight purposes. The Company’s participation in reinsurance arrangements does not relieve the Company from its obligations to policyholders.

Approximate reinsurance recoverables by reinsurer as of December 31, 2009 are as follows:
  Unpaid  Paid    
 ($ in thousands) Losses  Losses  Total 
 Motors Insurance Corporation $4,597  $554  $5,151 
 SCOR Reinsurance Company  1,322   122   1,444 
 Folksamerica Reinsurance Company  1,033   33   1,066 
 Others  3,412   641   4,053 
 Total $10,364  $1,350  $11,714 
To reduce the Company’s credit exposure to reinsurance, the net ceded recoverable balances due from SCOR Reinsurance Company, Motors Insurance Corporation and Maiden Reinsurance Company (related to all quota share and excess of loss reinsurance agreements effective January 1, 2006 and subsequent) are secured pursuant to collateralized trust agreements.  Assets held in these three trusts are not included in the Company’s invested assets and investment income earned on these assets is credited to the three reinsurers respectively.  Net reinsurance recoverables from SCOR Reinsurance, Motors Reinsurance and Maiden Reinsurance in total that were secured by these agreements were $14,146,000 at December 31, 2009. These trust agreements do not cover any recoverables from reinsurance agreements effectiv e prior to January 1, 2006.
F-28

Reinsurance recoverable from Allied World Assurance Company and Amlin Bermuda Ltd. are guaranteed by an irrevocable bank letter of credit.
Ceding Commissions
The Company earns ceding commissions under its quota share reinsurance agreements based on a sliding scale of commission rates and ultimate treaty year loss ratios on the policies reinsured under each of these agreements. The sliding scale includes minimum and maximum commission rates in relation to specified ultimate loss ratios.  The commission rate and ceding commissions earned increase when the estimated ultimate loss ratio decreases and, conversely, the commission rate and ceding commissions earned decrease when the estimated ultimate loss ratio increases.
As of December 31, 2009 the Company’s estimated ultimate loss ratios attributable to these contracts are lower than the contractual ultimate loss ratios at which the minimum amount of ceding commissions can be earned. Accordingly, the Company has recorded ceding commissions earned that are greater than the minimum commissions.

Ceding commissions for period from July 1, 2009 (date of KICO acquisition) through December 31, 2009 consist of the following:
 Ceded commission on reinsurance treaties $2,240,273 
 Contingent commission ceded  (25,192)
  $2,215,081 

Note 9 - Notes Receivable-Commercial Mutual Insurance Company
Purchase of Notes Receivable
 
On January 31, 2006, wethe Company purchased from Eagle Insurance Company (“Eagle”) two surplus notes issued by Commercial Mutual Insurance Company (“CMIC”) in the aggregate principal amount of $3,750,000 (the “Surplus Notes”), plus accrued interest of $1,794,688. The aggregate purchase price for the Surplus Notes was $3,075,141, of which $1,303,434 was paid to Eagle by delivery of a six month promissory note which provided for interest at the rate of 7.5% per annum.  The promissory note was paid in full on July 28, 2006.  CMIC (now renamed Kingstone Insurance Company) is a New York property and casualty insurer. TheAs of June 30, 2009, the Surplus Notes acquired by us arewere past due and provideprovided for interest at the prime rate or 8.5% per annum, whichever is less.  Payments of principalprinc ipal and interest on the Surplus Notes maycould only be made out of the surplus of CMIC and requirerequired the approval of the New York State Department of Insurance.  During the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007,The Company did not receive any interest payments totaling $-0-during 2009 and $125,000, respectively, were received.2008. The discount on the Surplus Notes and the accrued interest at the time of acquisition were accreted over a 30 month period through July 31, 2008, the estimated period to collect such amounts. SuchThrough June 30, 2009 and for the year ended December 31, 2008, such accretion amount, together with interest on the Surplus Notes, for the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007, are included in ourthe consolidated statement of operations as “Interest income-notes receivable.”

F-12
DCAP GROUP, INC. AND
SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Financial Statements
Years Ended December 31, 2008 and 2007

Possible Future ConversionExchange of Notes Receivable
 
InSee Note 3 for a discussion of the exchange of the Surplus Notes and accrued interest for 100% of the equity of Kingstone Insurance Company.
F-29

Note 10 - Notes Receivable-Sale of Businesses
Retail Business
New York Stores: On April 17, 2009, the Company’s wholly-owned subsidiaries that owned and operated 16 Retail Business locations in New York State sold substantially all of their assets, including their book of business (the “New York Assets”). The purchase price for the New York Assets was approximately $2,337,000, of which approximately $1,786,000 was paid at closing.  Promissory notes in the aggregate approximate original principal amount of $551,000 (the “New York Notes”) were also delivered at the closing.  The New York Notes are payable in installments of approximately $73,000 on March 2007, CMIC’s Board31, 2010 (which was paid), monthly installments of Directors adopted$50,000 each between April 30, 2010 and November 30, 2010 and a resolutionpayment of approximately $ 105,000 on November 30, 2010,and provide for interest at the rate of 12.625% per annum.
Pennsylvania Stores:  Effective June 30, 2009, the Company sold all of the outstanding stock of the subsidiary that operated the three remaining Pennsylvania stores (the “Pennsylvania Stock”).  The purchase price for the Pennsylvania Stock was approximately $397,000 which was paid by delivery of two promissory notes, one in the approximate principal amount of $238,000 and payable with interest at the rate of 9.375% per annum in 120 equal monthly installments, and the other in the approximate principal amount of $159,000 and payable with interest at the rate of 6% per annum in 60 monthly installments commencing August 10, 2011 (with interest only being payable prior to convert CMIC from an advance premium cooperative insurance company tosuch date).
Franchise Business
Effective May 1, 2009, the Company sold all of the outstanding stock of the subsidiaries that operated the DCAP franchise business (collectively, the “Franchise Stock”).  The purchase price for the Franchise Stock was $200,000 which was paid by delivery of a stock propertypromissory note in such principal amount (the “Franchise Note”).  The Franchise Note is payable in installments of $50,000 on May 15, 2009, $50,000 on May 1, 2010 and casualty insurance company.  CMIC has advised us that it has obtained permission$100,000 on May 1, 2011 and provides for interest at the rate of 5.25% per annum.  A principal of the buyer is the son-in-law of Morton L. Certilman, one of the Company’s principal shareholders.
Notes receivable arising from the Superintendentsale of Insurance of the State of New York (the “Superintendent”) to proceed with the conversion process (subject to certain conditions as discussed below).
The conversion by CMIC to a stock property and casualty insurance company is subject to a number of conditions, including the approval of the plan of conversion, which was filed with the Superintendent on April 25, 2008, by both the Superintendent and CMIC’s policyholders.  As part of the approval process, the Superintendent had an appraisal performed with respect to the fair market value of CMICbusinesses as of December 31, 2006.  In addition,2009 consists of:
     Less    
  Total  Current    
  Note  Maturities  Long-Term 
Sale of NY stores $550,543  $550,543  $- 
Sale of Pennsylvania stores  390,910   15,698   375,212 
Sale of Franchise business  150,000   50,000   100,000 
   1,091,453   616,241   475,212 
Accrued interest  27,912   27,912   - 
Total $1,119,365  $644,153  $475,212 
Note 11 - Deferred Acquisition Costs and Deferred Ceding Commission Revenue

Acquisition costs incurred and policy-related ceding commission revenue are deferred and amortized to income on property and casualty business for the Insurance Department conducted a five year examinationperiod from July 1, 2009 (date of CMICKICO acquisition) through December 31, 2009 as follows:

F-30

 Net deferred acquisition costs net of ceding   
 commission revenue, July 1, 2009 $(34,574)
     
 Cost incurred and deferred:    
 Commissions and brokerage  2,271,783 
 Other underwriting and acquisition costs  795,377 
 Ceding commission revenue  (2,875,124)
 Net deferred acquisition costs net of ceding    
 commission revenue deferred during year  192,036 
 Amortization  (537,723)
   (345,687)
     
Net deferred acquisition costs net of ceding    
commission revenue, end of period $(380,261)

Ending balances for deferred acquisition costs and deferred ceding commission revenue as of December 31, 2006 and held a public hearing in October 2008 to consider the conversion plan. We, as a holder of the CMIC Surplus Notes, at our option, would be able to exchange the Surplus Notes for an equitable share of the securities or other consideration, or both, of the corporation into which CMIC would be converted.  Based upon the amount payable on the Surplus Notes and the statutory surplus of CMIC, the plan of conversion provides that, in the event of a conversion by CMIC into a stock corporation, in exchange for our relinquishing our rights to any unpaid principal and interest under the Surplus Notes, we would receive 100% of the stock of CMIC. Upon the effectiveness of the conversion, CMIC’s name will change to “Kingstone Insurance Company.”  We obtained stockholder approval of an amendment to our certificate of incorporation to change our name to “Kingstone Companies, Inc.”  Such name change would only take place in the event that the conversion occurs and we obtain a controlling interest in Kingstone Insurance Company.  No assurances can be given that the conversion will occur or as to the terms of the conversion.2009 follows:
 
Our Chairman is also Chairman of CMIC. One of our other directors and our Chief Accounting Officer are also directors of CMIC.
 Deferred acquisition costs $2,917,984 
 Deferred ceding commission revenue  (3,298,245)
 Balance at end of period $(380,261)
 
4.
Note 12 - Property and Equipment

PropertyThe components of property and equipment consists of the following:are summarized as follows:
 
F-13
      Accumulated    
  
Cost
  
Depreciation
  
Net
 
          
December 31, 2009         
 Building $1,379,631  $(20,802) $1,358,829 
 Land  132,097   -   132,097 
 Furniture  76,850   (53,574)  23,276 
 Computer equipment and software  284,925   (160,957)  123,968 
 Automobile  29,183   (8,338)  20,845 
 Total $1,902,686  $(243,671) $1,659,015 
             
December 31, 2008            
 Furniture $58,076  $(47,833) $10,243 
 Computer equipment and software  157,611   (154,589)  3,022 
 Entertainment facility  200,538   (131,186)  69,352 
 Total $416,225  $(333,608) $82,617 
DCAP GROUP, INC. AND
SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Financial Statements
Years Ended December 31, 2008 and 2007

 December 31, Useful Lives 2008  2007 
        
 Furniture, fixtures & equipment 5 years $186,889  $184,581 
 Leasehold improvements 3 - 5 years  61,465   60,227 
 Computer hardware, software and office equipment 2 - 5 years  526,595   487,097 
 Entertainment facility 20 years  200,538   200,538 
    975,487   932,443 
 Less accumulated depreciation   884,994   776,764 
   $90,493  $155,679 

Depreciation expense for the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008 was $31,192 and 2007 was approximately $69,000 and $102,000,$36,774, respectively.

5. Accounts PayableNote 13 - Property and Accrued ExpensesCasualty Insurance Activity

Accounts payablePremiums written, ceded and accrued expenses consistsearned for the period from July 1, 2009 (date of the following:KICO acquisition) through December 31, 2009 are as follows:
  Direct   Assumed   Ceded   Net
 Premiums written $    13,572,779   $             8,252   $  (9,180,860)   $    4,400,171
 Change in unearned premiums          (206,292)               (2,520)           334,982            126,170
 Premiums earned $    13,366,487   $             5,732   $  (8,845,878)   $    4,526,341
 
F-31

 December 31, 2008  2007 
       
 Accounts payable $314,249  $257,710 
 Interest  115,903   85,902 
 Payroll and related costs  26,032   16,978 
 Professional fees  366,166   209,859 
  $822,350  $570,449 
         
6. Debentures Payable

In 1971, pursuant to a planPremium receipts in advance of arrangement, we issued a seriesthe policy effective date are recorded as advance premiums.  The balance of debentures, which matured in 1977. Asadvance premiums as of December 31, 2009 and 2008 was approximately $412,000 and 2007, $154,200$-0-, respectively.

The components of the liability for loss and LAE expenses (“LAE”) and related reinsurance receivables as of December 31, 2009 are as follows:
   Gross  Reinsurance 
  Liability  Receivables 
 Case-basis reserves $10,852,360  $7,008,201 
 Loss adjustment expenses  2,044,703   1,160,811 
 IBNR reserves  3,616,255   2,343,291 
 Recoverable on unpaid losses      10,512,303 
 Recoverable on paid losses  -   1,201,250 
 Total loss and loss adjustment expenses $16,513,318   11,713,553 
 Unearned premiums      9,136,068 
 Total reinsurance receivables     $20,849,621 

The following table provides a reconciliation of the beginning and ending balances for unpaid losses and LAE for the period from July 1, 2009 (date of KICO acquisition) through December 31, 2009:
 Balance at July 1, 2009 $16,431,191 
 Less reinsurance recoverables  (9,730,288)
    6,700,903 
     
 Incurred related to:    
 Current year  1,864,515 
 Prior years  170,956 
 Total incurred  2,035,471 
     
 Paid related to:    
 Current year  975,376 
 Prior years  1,759,983 
 Total paid  2,735,359 
      
 Net balance at end of period  6,001,015 
 Add reinsurance recoverables  10,512,303 
 Balance at end of period $16,513,318 
Incurred losses and LAE are net of reinsurance recoveries under reinsurance contracts of $2,949,817 for the period from July 1, 2009 (date of KICO acquisition) through December 31, 2009.

Prior year incurred loss and LAE development is based upon numerous estimates by line of business and accident year. The Company’s management continually monitors claims activity to assess the appropriateness of carried case and IBNR reserves, giving consideration to Company and industry trends.
Loss and loss adjustment expense reserves

The reserving process for loss adjustment expense reserves provides for the Company’s best estimate at a particular point in time of the ultimate unpaid cost of all losses and loss adjustment expenses incurred, including settlement and administration of losses, and is based on facts and circumstances then known and including losses that have been incurred but not yet been reported. The process includes using actuarial methodologies to assist in establishing these debentures has not beenestimates, judgments relative to estimates of future claims severity and frequency, the length of time before losses will develop to their ultimate level and the possible changes in the law and other external factors that are often beyond the Company’s control. The loss ratio projection method is used to estimate loss reserves. The process produces carried reserves set by management based upon the actuaries’ best estimate and is the result of numerous best estimates made by line of business, accident year, and loss and loss adjustment expense. The amount of loss and loss adjustment expense reserves for reported claims is based primarily upon a case-by-case evaluation of coverage, liability, injury severity, and any other information considered pertinent to estimating the exposure presented by the claim. The amounts of loss and loss adjustment expense reserves for payment. Accordingly,unreported claims are determined using historical information by line of insurance as adjusted to current conditions. Since this balance has beenprocess produces loss reserves set by management based upon the actuaries’ best estimate, there is no explicit or implicit provision for uncertainty in the carried loss reserves.
F-32

Due to the inherent uncertainty associated with the reserving process, the ultimate liability may differ, perhaps substantially, from the original estimate. Such estimates are regularly reviewed and updated and any resulting adjustments are included in otherthe current liabilitiesyear’s results. Reserves are closely monitored and are recomputed periodically using the most recent information on reported claims and a variety of statistical techniques. Specifically, on at least a quarterly basis, the Company reviews, by line of business, existing reserves, new claims, changes to existing case reserves and paid losses with respect to the current and prior years.
The table below shows the method used by product line and accident year to select the estimated year-ending loss reserves:
 Accident Year
 Product Line Most Recent 1st Prior All Other
 FireLoss Ratio Loss DevelopmentLoss Development
 HomeownersLoss Ratio Loss DevelopmentLoss Development
 Multi-FamilyLoss Ratio Loss DevelopmentLoss Development
 Commercial multiple-peril propertyLoss Ratio Loss DevelopmentLoss Development
 Commercial multiple-peril liabilityLoss Ratio Loss DevelopmentLoss Development
 Other LiabilityLoss Ratio Loss DevelopmentLoss Development
 Commercial Auto LiabilityLoss Ratio Loss DevelopmentLoss Development
 Auto Physical DamageLoss Ratio Loss DevelopmentLoss Development
 Personal Auto LiabilityLoss Ratio Loss DevelopmentLoss Development

Two key assumptions that materially impact the estimate of loss reserves are the loss ratio estimate for the current accident year and the loss development factor selections for all accident years. The loss ratio estimate for the current accident year is selected after reviewing historical accident year loss ratios adjusted for rate changes, trend, and mix of business.

The Company is not aware of any claims trends that have emerged or that would cause future adverse development that have not already been considered in existing case reserves and in its current loss development factors.

In New York State, lawsuits for negligence, subject to certain limitations, must be commenced within three years from the date of the accident or are otherwise barred. Accordingly, the Company’s exposure to IBNR for accident years 2005 and prior is limited although there remains the possibility of adverse development on reported claims. This is reflected by the loss development as of December 31, 2009 showing developed redundancies since 2005. However, there are no assurances that future loss development and trends will be consistent with its past loss development history, and so adverse loss reserves development remains a risk factor to the Company’s business.

The Company was previously a one-third participant in a pool arrangement. Effective November 1, 1997, the Company withdrew from its participation in the accompanying consolidatedpool arrangement. Accordingly, the Company will only be participating in losses and allocated loss adjustment expenses that occurred prior to that date. A reserve was established due to the potential that the pool will be unable to collect reinsurance on certain lead paint cases. The balance sheet. Interest has not been accrued onof the remaining debentures payable. In addition, no interest, penalties or other charges have been accrued with regard to any escheat obligation.reserve was $146,000 as of December 31, 2009.

7.
F-33

Note 14 - Long-Term Debt

Long-term debt and capital lease obligations consist of:
 
F-14
DCAP GROUP, INC. AND
SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Financial Statements
Years Ended December 31, 2008 and 2007
  December 31, 2009  December 31, 2008 
     Less        Less    
  Total  Current  Long-Term  Total  Current  Long-Term 
  Debt  Maturities  Debt  Debt  Maturities  Debt 
Capitalized lease $35,637  $24,466  $11,171  $58,133  $22,338  $35,795 
Note payable,                        
Accurate acquisition  -   -   -   450,695   70,872   379,823 
Notes payable  1,050,000   -   1,050,000   1,500,000   1,500,000   - 
  $1,085,637  $24,466  $1,061,171  $2,008,828  $1,593,210  $415,618 
 
 December 31, 2008  2007 
       
Note payable, Accurate acquisition $450,695  $517,113 
Term loan from Manufacturers & Traders Trust Co.  -   520,000 
Capitalized lease  58,133   78,672 
Notes payable  1,500,000   1,500,000 
Unamortized value of stock purchase warrants issued in connection with notes payable  -   (17,731)
   2,008,828   2,598,054 
Less current maturities  1,593,210   2,098,989 
  $415,618  $499,065 
         

Note Payable, Accurate Acquisition - - Note issued
On April 17, 2009, the Company paid the balance of the note payable incurred in connection with the purchase of Accurate payable in monthly installments of $9,255 through December 2009 and $11,111 from January 2010 through maturity date of December 10, 2012. In September 2008, the installment payments due in September 2008 through April 2009 were reduced to $6,800, with the remaining $2,455 due for such months being payable during the eight months following the scheduled maturity on December 10, 2012. Payments on the note commenced in January 2007.  Interest has been imputed at the rate of 7% per annum.acquisition.

Term Loan from Manufacturers and Traders Trust Company (“M&T”) - The M&T term loan was payable in quarterly principal installments of $130,000 through March 1, 2008. In June 2008, the maturity date of the M&T term loan was extended to December 31, 2008. Principal payments of $55,714 were due on the first day of each month and one final payment on the maturity date. Interest at the rate of LIBOR plus 2.75% was payable monthly.  The M&T term loan was paid in full in December 2008.

Capitalized Lease - Capitalized lease payable for computer equipment, payable in monthly installments of $2,241 per month, including interest at 9.1% per annum. The term of the capitalized lease is through June 30, 2011. The capitalized lease is collateralized by computer equipment with a carrying cost and accumulated depreciation approximating $90,000 and $42,000, respectively, at December 31, 2008.

Notes Payable - The notes payable bear interest at 12.625% per annum, payable semi-annually. The notes were subordinate to the revolving credit facility included in discontinued operations, and were secured by a security interest in the assets of our premium finance subsidiary and a pledge of our subsidiary's stock. Effective February 1, 2008, upon the sale of the premium finance portfolio, the notes were no longer subordinated to the revolving credit facility and there is no longer a security interest in the assets of our premium financing subsidiary; however, the notes were subordinated to the above term loan from M&T. In December 2008, such term loan was paid in full.

In August 2008, the maturity date of our $1,500,000 notes payable was extended from September 30, 2008 to the earlier of July 10, 2009 or 90 days following the conversion of CMIC to a stock property and casualty insurance company and the issuance to us of a controlling interest in CMIC (see Note 3) (subject to acceleration under certain circumstances). In exchange for this extension, the holders will receive an aggregate incentive payment equal to $10,000 times the number of months (or partial months) the debt is outstanding after September 30, 2008 through the maturity date. If a prepayment of principal reduces the debt below $1,500,000, the incentive payment for all subsequent months will be reduced in proportion to any such reduction to the debt. The aggregate incentive payment is due upon full repayment of the debt. As of December 31, 2008, $30,000the outstanding principal balance of Notes Payable was $1,500,000. On May 12, 2009, three of the holders of the notes exchanged an aggregate of $519,231 of note principal for Series E Preferred Stock having an aggregate redemption amount equal to such aggregate principal amount of notes (see Note 15). Concurrently, the Company paid $49,543 to the three holders, which amount represents all accrued and unpaid interest and incentive payments were included in accrued expenses.

F-15
DCAP GROUP, INC. AND
SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Financial Statements
Years Ended December 31, 2008 and 2007
through the date of exchange. As part of the transaction, a retirement trust established for the benefit of Jack Seibald, one of ourthe Company’s directors and a principal stockholder, indirectly holds approximately $288,000 ofstockholders, exchanged its note in the approximate principal amount of the notes payable.$288,000 for shares of Series E Preferred Stock.  In addition, a limited liability company of which Barry Goldstein, ourthe Com pany’s Chief Executive Officer, a director and a principal stockholder, is a minority member holdsexchanged its note in the approximate principal amount of $115,000 for shares of Series E Preferred Stock.
On May 12, 2009, the Company prepaid $686,539 in principal of the Notes Payable to the remaining five note holders, together with $81,200, which amount represents accrued and unpaid interest and incentive payments on such prepayment.
On June 29, 2009, the Company prepaid the remaining $294,230 in principal of the Notes Payable to such remaining note holders, together with $19,400, which amount represents accrued and unpaid interest and incentive payments on such prepayment.
From June 2009 through December 2009, the Company borrowed $1,050,000 and issued promissory notes in such aggregate principal amount (the “2009 Notes”).  The 2009 Notes provide for interest at the rate of 12.625% per annum and are payable on July 10, 2011. The 2009 Notes are prepayable without premium or penalty; provided, however, that, under any circumstances, the holders of the 2009 Notes are entitled to receive an aggregate of six months interest from the issue date of the 2009 Notes with respect to the amount prepaid.
Included in the 2009 Notes issued above were $560,000 issued to related parties as follows:

F-34

A limited liability company owned by Mr. Goldstein, along with Sam Yedid and Steven Shapiro (who are both directors of KICO), purchased a 2009 Note in the principal amount of $120,000. Jay Haft, a director of the notes payable.Company, purchased a 2009 Note in the principal amount of $50,000. A member of the family of Michael Feinsod, a director of the Company, purchased a 2009 Note in the principal amount of $100,000. Sam Yedid and members of his family purchased 2009 Notes in the aggregate principal amount of $220,000. A member of the family of Floyd Tupper, a director of KICO, purchased a 2009 Note in the principal amount of $70,000. Interest expense on related party borrowings for the year ended December 31, 2009 was approximately $20,000. From January 2010 through March 2010, the Company borrowed an additional $400,000 under the terms provided for in the 2009 Notes, of which $150,000 was borrowed from the IRA of Barry Goldstein.
 
Long-term debt matures as follows:
 
 Years ended December 31,   
2009 $1,593,210 
2010  134,031 
2011  129,041 
2012  126,471 
2013  26,075 
  $2,008,828 

8. Related Party Transactions

Professional fees – A law firm affiliated with one of our former directors was paid legal fees of $91,000 and $123,000 for the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively.

Guaranty – Under our revolving line of credit entered into in July 2006, our Chairman and CEO was obligated on an unlimited wind-down guaranty as long as the loan was in effect. Upon the sale of the premium finance portfolio on February 1, 2008, the wind-down guaranty was terminated.

Note receivable – Included in other current assets as of December 31, 2008 and 2007 was a note receivable of $39,000 (non-interest bearing) and $161,000 (interest bearing), respectively, from a franchisee who is affiliated with one of our former directors. Interest income from the interest bearing note was approximately $5,000 for the year ended December 31, 2007. In February 2008, the interest bearing note was paid in full.

9. Income Taxes

We file a consolidated U.S. Federal Income Tax return that includes all wholly-owned subsidiaries. State tax returns are filed on a consolidated or separate basis depending on applicable laws. The (benefit) provision for income taxes from continuing operations is comprised of the following:
 Years ended December 31,  
2010 $24,467 
2011  1,061,170 
  $1,085,637 
 
F-16
DCAP GROUP, INC. AND
SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Financial Statements
Years Ended December 31, 2008Note 15 - Exchange and 2007

 Years ended December 31, 2008  2007 
       
 Current:      
 Federal $-  $(306,000)
 State  95,775   (79,232)
   95,775   (385,232)
         
 Deferred:        
 Federal  (390,000)  (27,000)
 State  (97,000)  (7,000)
   (487,000)  (34,000)
         
  $(391,225) $(419,232)
         
A reconciliationIssuance of the federal statutory rate to our effective tax rate from continuing operations is as follows:

 Years ended December 31, 2008  2007 
       
 Computed expected tax expense  (34.00)  %  (34.00)  %
 State taxes, net of Federal benefit  (5.48)  (5.79)
 Tax benefit from current year loss of discontinued operations  (56.78)  - 
 Permanent differences  29.60   (7.61)
 Total tax (benefit)  (66.66)  %  (47.40)  %
At December 31, 2008, we had net operating loss carryforwards for tax purposes, which expire at various dates through 2019, of approximately $1,589,000. These net operating loss carryforwards are subject to Internal Revenue Code Section 382, which places a limitation on the utilization of the federal net operating loss to approximately $10,000 per year (“Annual Limitation”), as a result of a greater than 50% ownership change of DCAP Group, Inc. in 1999. The net operating loss of $1,136,000 from 2007 was carried back to 2005, resulting in a refund of $368,000. Our taxable loss for the year ended December 31, 2008 was approximately $1,879,000. This loss will be available for future years, expiring through December 31, 2028.

The tax effects of temporary differences which give rise to deferred tax assets and liabilities from continuing operations consist of the following:
F-17
DCAP GROUP, INC. AND
SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Financial Statements
Years Ended December 31, 2008 and 2007

 December 31, 2008  2007 
       
 Deferred tax assets:      
 Net operating loss carryovers subject to Annual Limitation $544,000  $544,000 
 Other net operating loss carryovers  846,000   452,000 
 Provision for doubtful accounts  16,000   20,000 
 Depreciation  21,000   - 
 Stock compensation expense  67,000   39,000 
 Gross deferred tax assets  1,494,000   1,055,000 
         
 Deferred tax liabilities:        
 Interest on note  1,144,000   838,000 
 Depreciation  -   8,000 
 Prepaid expenses  41,000   16,000 
 Gross deferred tax liabilities  1,185,000   862,000 
         
 Net deferred tax assets before valuation allowance  309,000   193,000 
 Less valuation allowance due to Annual Limitation of net operating loss carryover  (493,000)  (496,000)
 Net deferred tax liability $(184,000) $(303,000)
10. Commitments

Leases - We, and each of our affiliates, lease office space under noncancellable operating leases expiring at various dates through December 31, 2015. Many of the leases are renewable and include additional rent for real estate taxes and other operating expenses. The minimum future rentals under these lease commitments for leased facilities and office equipment are as follows:
 Years ended December 31,   
2009 $383,376 
2010  221,539 
2011  136,734 
2012  36,493 
2013  37,200 
Thereafter  74,400 
  $889,742 
Rental expense from continuing operations approximated $78,000 and $76,000 for the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively.

The APA for the sale of our 16 New York State locations contemplates the assignment of the real estate leases for such locations to the buyer.

Employment agreement - Our President, Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer, Barry B. Goldstein, is employed pursuant to an employment agreement dated October 16, 2007 (the “Employment Agreement”) that expires on June 30, 2009. The Employment Agreement will automatically renew for a one-year term if Mr. Goldstein is in our employ on June 30, 2009.  Pursuant to the Employment Agreement, Mr. Goldstein is entitled to receive an annual base salary of $350,000 (which base salary has been in effect since January 1, 2004) (“Base Salary”) and annual bonuses based on our net income.  On August 25, 2008, we and Mr. Goldstein entered into an amendment (the “Amendment”) to the Employment Agreement. The Amendment entitles Mr. Goldstein to devote certain time to Commercial Mutual Insurance Company (“CMIC”) to fulfill his duties and responsibilities as its Chairman of the Board and Chief Investment Officer. Such permitted activity is subject to a reduction in Base Salary under the Employment Agreement on a dollar-for-dollar basis to the extent of the salary payable by CMIC to Mr. Goldstein pursuant to his CMIC employment contract, which is currently $150,000 per year. CMIC is a New York property and casualty insurer.
F-18
DCAP GROUP, INC. AND
SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Financial Statements
Years Ended December 31, 2008 and 2007

Litigation - - From time to time, we are involved in various lawsuits and claims incidental to our business. In the opinion of management, the ultimate liabilities, if any, resulting from such lawsuits and claims will not materially affect our financial position.

Tax audits - Our state income tax returns for the years ended December 31, 2005, 2006 and 2007 are currently under audit by New York State. The final results of this audit cannot be estimated by management. It is anticipated that the audit will be concluded in 2009. The audit of our federal income tax return for the year ended December 31, 2005 was completed in 2008. The audit resulted in no changes to our tax return as filed.

11. Mandatorily Redeemable Preferred Stock

On May 8, 2003, we issued 904 shares of Series A Preferred Stock in connection with the acquisition of substantially all of the assets of AIA.  The Series A Preferred Stock had a liquidation preference of $1,000 per share. Dividends on the Series A Preferred Stock at the rate of 5% per annum were cumulative and were payable in cash. Each share of the Series A Preferred Stock was convertible at the option of the holder at any time into shares of our Common Stock at a conversion rate of $2.50 per share.  Subject to legal availability of funds, the Series A Preferred Stock was mandatorily redeemable by us for cash at its liquidation preference on April 30, 2007, or earlier under certain circumstances (unless previously converted into our Common Stock).

On January 15, 2005, the preferred stockholder converted 124 shares of Series A Preferred Stock into 49,600 shares of our Common Stock.

Effective March 23, 2007, the holder of the Series A Preferred Stock exchanged such shares for an equal number of shares of Series B Preferred Stock, the terms of which were substantially identical to the shares of Series A Preferred Stock, except the outside date for mandatory redemption was April 30, 2008.

Effective April 16, 2008, AIA Acquisition Corp. (“AIA”), the holder of the Company’s Series B Preferred Stock exchanged such shares for an equal number of shares of Series C Preferred Stock, the terms of which were substantially identical to those of the shares of Series B Preferred Stock, except that the outside date for mandatory redemption was April 30, 2009 and the Series C Preferred Stock provided for dividends at the rate of 10% per annum.
 
Effective August 23, 2008, the holder ofAIA exchanged the Series C Preferred Stock exchanged such shares for an equal number of shares of Series D Preferred Stock, the terms of which arewere substantially identical to those of the shares of Series C Preferred Stock, except that the outside date for mandatory redemption iswas July 31, 2009.

Effective May 12, 2009, AIA exchanged the Series D Preferred Stock for an equal number of shares of Series E Preferred Stock.  The terms of the Series E Preferred Stock vary from those of the Series D Preferred Stock as follows: (i) the Series E Preferred Stock is mandatorily redeemable on July 31, 2011 (as compared to July 31, 2009 for the Series D Preferred Stock), (ii) the Series E Preferred Stock provides for dividends at the rate of 11.5% per annum (as compared to 10% per annum for the Series D Preferred Stock), (iii) the Series E Preferred Stock is convertible into Common Stock at a price of $2.00 per share (as compared to $2.50 per share for the Series D Preferred Stock), (iv) the Company’s obligation to redeem the Series E Preferred Stock is not accelerated based upon a sale of substantially all of its assets or certain of its subsidiaries (as compared to the Series D Preferred Stock which provided for such a cceleration) and (v) the Company’s obligation to redeem the Series E Preferred Stock is not secured by the pledge of the outstanding stock of its subsidiary, AIA-DCAP Corp. (as compared to the Series D Preferred Stock which provided for such pledge).  The current aggregate redemption amount for the Series DE Preferred Stock held by AIA is $780,000, plus accumulated and unpaid dividends.  Members of theMr. Goldstein’s family, of Barry B. Goldstein, our Chief Executive Officer,Sam Yedid and Steven Shapiro are principalamong the stockholders of AIA.
F-19
DCAP GROUP, INC. AND
SUBSIDIARIES Interest expense on related party preferred stock for the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008 was $118,681 and $66,625, respectively.

On May 12, 2009, three holders of the Company’s Notes to Financial StatementsPayable exchanged $519,231 of the principal balance of such notes for shares of Series E Preferred Stock having an aggregate redemption amount of $519,231 (see Note 14).
Years Ended
As of December 31, 2008 and 20072009, there were 1,299 shares outstanding of Series E Preferred Stock, convertible into 649,615 shares of Common Stock.

F-35

In accordance with SFAS No. 150, "AccountingGAAP guidance for Certain Financial Instrumentsaccounting for certain financial instruments with Characteristicscharacteristics of both Liabilitiesliabilities and Equity",equity, the various series of Preferred Stock have been reported as a liability, and the preferred dividends have been classified as interest expense.

Note 16 – Stockholders’ Equity

Preferred Stock

12. Stockholders' Equity

Preferred Stock - -During 2001, we amended our Certificate of Incorporation to provide for the authority to issue 1,000,000 shares of Preferred Stock, with a par value of $.01 per share. Our Board of Directors has the authority to issue shares of Preferred Stock from time to time in a series and to fix, before the issuance of each series, the number of shares in each series and the designation, liquidation preferences, conversion privileges, rights and limitations of each series.

Other Equity Compensation

Other Equity Compensation –
Other equity compensation consists of shares granted to directors. The fair value of stock grants for the periods indicated is as follows:
 
 Years ended December 31, 2008  2007 
 Class Number of shares granted  Valuation  Number of shares granted  Valuation 
             
 Directors  38,324  $40,500   -  $- 
 Consultants  -   -   3,000   8,820 
   38,324  $40,500   3,000  $8,820 
 Years ended December 31, 2009  2008 
       
 Number of shares granted  15,765   38,324 
 Valuation $38,274  $40,500 

Treasury Stock - - In June 2007, a shareholder tendered 4,500 shares of Common Stock to us to settle an obligation due us of approximately $7,200.

In August 2008, three shareholders tendered an aggregate of 34,602 shares of Common Stock to usthe Company to settle obligations due us of approximately $35,000. The tendered shares were recorded as an increase in treasury stock, valued at the balance of the obligation.

Stock Options

Warrants - On July 10, 2003, in connection with the issuance of debt, we issued warrants to purchase 105,000 shares of our Common Stock at an exercise price of $6.25 per share (the "Warrants"). The Warrants were valued at $147,000 and were being amortized as additional interest expense over the term of the associated debt. The Warrants were scheduled to expire on January 10, 2006. Effective May 25, 2005, the holders of $1,500,000 outstanding principal amount of the debt agreed to extend the maturity date of the debt from January 10, 2006 to September 30, 2007. This extension was given to satisfy a requirement of our premium finance lender that arose in connection with the increase in our revolving line of credit to $25,000,000 and the extension of the line to June 30, 2007. In consideration for the extension of the due date of the debt, we extended the expiration date of Warrants held by the debt holders for the purchase of 97,500 shares of our Common Stock from January 10, 2006 to September 30, 2007. The extension of the Warrants was valued at approximately $148,000 and was being amortized as additional interest expense over the extension period.  In March 2007 and September 2007, holders of approximately $1,385,000 and $115,000, respectively, of the principal amount of the debt agreed to extend the maturity date from September 30, 2007 to September 30, 2008.  In consideration for the extension of the due date of the debt, we extended the expiration date of Warrants held by the debt holders for the purchase of 97,500 shares of our Common Stock, with a fair value of $195,000, from September 30, 2007 to September 30, 2008.
F-20
DCAP GROUP, INC. AND
SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Financial Statements
Years Ended December 31, 2008 and 2007

Stock Options - -In November 1998, we adopted the 1998 Stock Option Plan (the “1998 Plan”), which provides for the issuance of incentive stock options and non-statutory stock options. Under this plan, options to purchase not more than 400,000 shares of our Common Stock were permitted to be granted, at a price to be determined by our Board of Directors or the Stock Option Committee at the time of grant. During 2002, we increased the number of shares of Common Stock authorized to be issued pursuant to the 1998 Plan to 750,000. Incentive stock options granted under the 1998 Plan expire no later than ten years from date of grant (except no later than five years for a grant to a 10% stockholder). Our Board of Directors or the Stock Option Committee will determine the expiration date with respect to non-statutory options granted under the 1998 Plan.Pl an. The 1998 Plan terminated in November 2008.

In December 2005, our shareholders ratified the adoption of the 2005 Equity Participation Plan (the “2005 Plan” and together with the 1998 Plan, the “Plans”), which provides for the issuance of incentive stock options, non-statutory stock options and restricted stock. Under the 2005 Plan, a maximum of 300,000 shares of Common Stock may be issued pursuant to options granted and restricted stock issued. Incentive stock options granted under the 2005 Plan expire no later than ten years from date of grant (except no later than five years for a grant to a 10% stockholder). Our Board of Directors or the Stock Option Committee will determine the expiration date with respect to non-statutory options, and the vesting provisions for restricted stock, granted under the 2005 Plan.

Our results of continuing operations for the years ended December 31, 20082009 and 20072008 include share-based compensation expense totaling approximately $72,000$51,000 and $97,000,$72,000, respectively.  Such compensation amounts have been included in the Consolidated Statement of Income within general and administrative expenses.

No stock options were granted during the year ended December 31, 2008.
F-36

The weighted average estimated fair value of stock options granted during the year ended December 31, 20072009 was $1.22$1.98 per share.  The fair value of options at the date of grant was estimated using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. During 2007,2009, we took into consideration the guidance under SFAS 123(R) and SAB No. 107 when reviewing and updating assumptions. The expected volatility is based upon historical volatility of our stock and other contributing factors. The expected term is based upon observation of actual time elapsed between date of grant and exercise of options for all employees. Previously such assumptions were determined based on historical data.  No stock options were granted during the year ended December 31, 2008.

The fair value of each option grant is estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model. The following weighted average assumptions were used for grants during the year ended December 31, 2007:2009:

 Dividend Yield0.00%
 Volatility60.79%170.77%
 Risk-Free Interest Rate5.00%2.66%
 Expected Life5 years

The Black-Scholes option valuation model was developed for use in estimating the fair value of traded options, which have no vesting restrictions and are fully transferable. In addition, option valuation models require the input of highly subjective assumptions including the expected stock price volatility. Because our stock options have characteristics significantly different from those of traded options, and because changes in the subjective input assumptions can materially affect the fair value estimate, in management's opinion, the existing models do not necessarily provide a reliable single measure of the fair value of our stock options.
F-21
DCAP GROUP, INC. AND
SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Financial Statements
Years Ended December 31, 2008 and 2007

A summary of option activity under the Plans as of December 31, 2008,2009, and changes during the year then ended is as follows:
 
Stock Options Number of Shares  Weighted Average Exercise Price per Share  Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Term  Aggregate Intrinsic Value 
             
Outstanding at January 1, 2008  268,624  $2.55   -   - 
                 
Forfeited  (91,224) $2.84   -   - 
                 
Outstanding at December 31, 2008  177,400  $2.40   3.35  $- 
                 
Vested and Exercisable at December 31, 2008  112,921  $2.60   3.11  $- 
                 
Stock Options Number of Shares  Weighted Average Exercise Price per Share  Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Term  Aggregate Intrinsic Value 
             
Outstanding at January 1, 2009  177,400  $2.40   -   - 
Granted  70,000  $2.35   -   - 
Forfeited  (22,400) $3.82   -   - 
                 
Outstanding at December 31, 2009  225,000  $2.24   3.17  $67,550 
                 
Vested and Exercisable at December 31, 2009  139,167  $2.24   2.66  $47,646 

See Note 21 - Commitments and Contingencies (Employment Agreements), for additional options issued in March 2010.

The aggregate intrinsic value of options outstanding and options exercisable at December 31, 20082009 is calculated as the difference between the exercise price of the underlying options and the market price of ourthe Company’s Common Stock for the shares that had exercise prices that were lower than the $0.48$2.49 closing price of our Common Stock on December 31, 2008. The total intrinsic value of2009. No stock options were exercised in the years ended December 31, 20082009 and 2007 was $-0- and $96,750, respectively, determined as of the date of exercise. We received cash proceeds from options exercised in the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007 of approximately $-0- and $112,000, respectively.2008.

F-37

A summary of the status of our non-vested options as of December 31, 20082009 and the changes during the year ended December 31, 2008,2009, is as follows:
 
 Options  Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value  Options  Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value 
Nonvested at December 31, 2007  142,756  $1.21 
Nonvested at December 31, 2008  64,479  $1.10 
Granted  70,000  $1.98 
Vested  (44,854)  1.16   (46,042) $1.31 
Forfeited  (33,423)  1.41   (2,604) $0.97 
Nonvested at December 31, 2008  64,479  $1.10 
Nonvested at December 31, 2009  85,833  $1.71 

As of December 31, 20082009 and 2007,2008, the fair value of unamortized compensation cost related to unvested stock option awards was approximately $71,000$85,000 and $141,000,$71,000, respectively. Unamortized compensation cost as of December 31, 20082009 is expected to be recognized over a remaining weighted-average vesting period of 1.82.52 years. For the year ended December 31, 2007, the weighted average fair value of options exercised was $1.10.
F-22
DCAP GROUP, INC. AND
SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Financial Statements
Years Ended December 31, 2008 and 2007
The total fair value of shares vested during the year ended December 31, 20082009 and 20072008 was approximately $52,000$60,000 and $77,000,$52,000, respectively.

Common shares reserved - As of December 31, 2008,2009, there were 327,40072,500 shares reserved under the Plans.2005 Plan.

13.
Note 17 - Statutory Financial Information and Accounting Policies
For regulatory purposes, the Company’s Insurance Subsidiaries prepare their statutory basis financial statements in accordance with practices prescribed or permitted by the state in which they are domiciled (“statutory basis” or “SAP”). The more significant SAP variances from GAAP are as follows:
•  Policy acquisition costs are charged to operations in the year such costs are incurred, rather than being deferred and amortized as premiums are earned over the terms of the policies.
•  Ceding commission revenues are earned when ceded premiums are written except for ceding commission revenues in excess of anticipated acquisition costs, which are deferred and amortized as ceded premiums are earned. GAAP requires that all ceding commission revenues be earned as the underlying ceded premiums are earned over the term of the reinsurance agreements.
•  Certain assets including certain receivables, a portion of the net deferred tax asset, prepaid expenses and furniture and equipment are not admitted.
•  Investments in fixed-maturity securities are valued at NAIC value for statutory financial purposes, which is primarily amortized cost. GAAP requires certain investments in fixed-maturity securities classified as available for sale, to be reported at fair value.
•  Certain amounts related to ceded reinsurance are reported on a net basis within the statutory basis financial statements. GAAP requires these amounts to be shown gross.
For SAP purposes, changes in deferred income taxes relating to temporary differences between net income for financial reporting purposes and taxable income are recognized as a separate component of gains and losses in surplus rather than included in income tax expense or benefit as required under GAAP.
F-38

State insurance laws restrict the ability of the Company to declare dividends. State insurance regulators require insurance companies to maintain specified levels of statutory capital and surplus. Generally, dividends may only be paid out of unassigned surplus, and the amount of an insurer’s unassigned surplus following payment of any dividends must be reasonable in relation to the insurer’s outstanding liabilities and adequate to meet its financial needs. In connection with the plan of conversion of CMIC, Kingstone has agreed with the Insurance Department that for a period of two years following the effective date of conversion of July 1, 2009, no dividend may be paid by KICO without the approval of the Insurance Department. Kingstone has also agreed with the Insurance Department that any intercompany transaction between i tself and KICO must be filed with the Insurance Department 30 days prior to implementation.

For the period from July 1, 2009 (date of KICO acquisition) through December 31, 2009, KICO had statutory basis net income of $871,753. At December 31, 2009, KICO had reported statutory basis surplus as regards policyholders of $9,021,357, as filed with the Insurance Department.

Note 18 - Risk Based Capital

State insurance departments impose risk-based capital (“RBC”) requirements on insurance enterprises. The RBC Model serves as a benchmark for the regulation of insurance companies by state insurance regulators.  RBC provides for targeted surplus levels based on formulas, which specify various weighting factors that are applied to financial balances or various levels of activity based on the perceived degree of risk, and are set forth in the RBC requirements. Such formulas focus on four general types of risk: (a) the risk with respect to the company’s assets (asset or default risk); (b) the risk of default on amounts due from reinsurers, policyholders, or other creditors (credit risk); (c) the risk of underestimating liabilities from business already written or inadequately pricing business to b e written in the coming year (underwriting risk); and, (d) the risk associated with items such as excessive premium growth, contingent liabilities, and other items not reflected on the balance sheet (off-balance sheet risk). The amount determined under such formulas is called the authorized control level RBC (“ACLC”).

The RBC guidelines define specific capital levels based on a company’s ACLC that are determined by the ratio of the company’s total adjusted capital (“TAC”) to its ACLC. TAC is equal to statutory capital, plus or minus certain other specified adjustments. The Company is in compliance with RBC requirements as of December 31, 2009.

Note 19 – Income Taxes

The Company files a consolidated U.S. Federal Income Tax return that includes all wholly-owned subsidiaries. KICO and its subsidiaries are consolidated as of July 1, 2009. State tax returns are filed on a consolidated or separate basis depending on applicable laws.
The (benefit) provision for income taxes from continuing operations is comprised of the following:
 Years ended December 31, 2009  2008 
       
 Current Federal income tax expense $-  $- 
 Current state income tax expense  47,292   42,803 
 Deferred Federal and State income tax expense  (114,096)  (491,000)
 Provision for income taxes $(66,804) $(448,197)

At December 31, 2008, the Company had net operating loss carryforwards for tax purposes, which expire at various dates through 2019, of approximately $1,589,000. These net operating loss carryforwards are subject to Internal Revenue Code Section 382, which places a limitation on the utilization of the federal net operating loss to approximately $10,000 per year (“Annual Limitation”), as a result of a greater than 50% ownership change of the Company in 1999. The taxable loss for the year ended December 31, 2009 was approximately $430,000. This loss will be available for future years, expiring through December 31, 2029.

F-39

For the year ended December 31, 2009, the gain on acquisition of KICO was treated as a permanent difference for income tax purposes. For the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008 the tax benefit resulting from the losses of discontinued operations was recorded in continuing operations.

A reconciliation of the federal statutory rate to our effective tax rate from continuing operations is as follows:
 Years ended December 31, 2009  2008 
       
 Computed expected tax expense  34.00%  (34.00)
 State taxes, net of Federal benefit  1.24   (5.48)
 Permanent differences  (36.57)  (82.07)
 Total tax (benefit)  (1.33)  %  (121.55)
Deferred tax assets and liabilities are determined using the enacted tax rates applicable to the period the temporary differences are expected to be recovered. Accordingly, the current period income tax provision can be affected by the enactment of new tax rates. The net deferred income taxes on the balance sheet reflect temporary differences between the carrying amounts of the assets and liabilities for financial reporting purposes and income tax purposes, tax effected at a various rates depending on whether the temporary differences are subject to Federal taxes, State taxes, or both. Significant components of the Company’s deferred tax assets and liabilities are as follows:
 December 31, 2009  2008 
       
 Deferred tax asset:      
 Net operating loss carryovers subject to annual limitations $544,000  $846,000 
 Other net operating loss carryovers  901,297   544,000 
 Claims reserve discount  152,951   - 
 Unearned premium  337,422   - 
 Loss and loss adjustment expenses  78,200   - 
 Deferred ceding commission revenue  1,121,403   - 
 Depreciation and amortization  -   21,000 
 Stock compensation expense  -   67,000 
 Loss from uninsured bank deposits  83,691   - 
 Other  137,300   - 
 Total deferred tax assets  3,356,264   1,478,000 
         
 Deferred tax liability:        
 Investment in KICO  1,169,000   1,144,000 
 Deferred acquisition costs  992,115   - 
 Intangibles  1,568,114   - 
 Depreciation and amortization  192,838   - 
 Net unrealized appreciation of securities  114,453   - 
 Other  -   41,000 
 Total deferred tax liabilities  4,036,520   1,185,000 
         
 Net deferred tax (liabilty)/asset before valuation allowance  (680,256)  293,000 
 Less valuation allowance due to Annual Limitation of net operating loss carryover  (493,000)  (493,000)
 Net deferred income tax liability $(1,173,256) $(200,000)

In assessing the valuation of deferred tax assets, the Company considers whether it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. The ultimate realization of deferred tax assets is dependent upon the generation of future taxable income during the periods in which those temporary differences become deductible. No valuation allowance against deferred tax assets has been established, except for NOL limitations, as the Company believes it is more likely than not the deferred tax assets will be realized based on the historical taxable income of KICO.
F-40

Effective January 1, 2009, the Company adopted GAAP guidance for the accounting for uncertainty in income taxes and had no material unrecognized tax benefit and no adjustments to liabilities or operations were required.

Note 20 - Employee Benefit Plans

Through December 31, 2009, qualified employees were eligible to participate in a salary reduction plan under Section 401(k) of the Internal Revenue Code. The plan was terminated effective December 31, 2009. For the year ended December 31, 2008, the Company matched 25% of the employees’ contribution up to 6%. Effective January 1, 2009, the Company no longer match employees’ contributions. Contributions for the year ended December 31, 2008 approximated $18,000.

The Company’s insurance subsidiary, KICO, maintains a salary reduction plan under Section 401(k) of the Internal Revenue Code (“401(k) Plan”) for its qualified employees. KICO matches 100% of each participant’s contribution up to 4% of the participant’s eligible contribution. The Company, at its discretion may allocate an amount for additional contributions (“Additional Contributions”) to the 401(k) Plan. The Company incurred approximately $152,000 of expense for the year ended December 31, 2009 related to the 401(k) Plan, which included approximately $111,000 of Additional Contributions.

Note 21 - Commitments and Contingencies

Litigation

From time to time, the Company is involved in various legal proceedings in the ordinary course of business. For example, to the extent a claim asserted by a third party in a law suit against one of the Company’s insureds covered by a particular policy, the Company may have a duty to defend the insured party against the claim. These claims may relate to bodily injury, property damage or other compensable injuries as set forth in the policy. Such proceedings are considered in estimating the liability for loss and LAE expenses. The Company is not subject to any other pending legal proceedings that management believes are likely to have a material adverse effect on the financial statements.

Employment Agreements

Chief Executive Officer (Kingstone)

The Company’s President, Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer, Barry B. Goldstein, is employed pursuant to an employment agreement, dated October 16, 2007, as amended (the “Goldstein Employment Agreement”), that expires on December 31, 2014. Pursuant to the Goldstein Employment Agreement, effective January 1, 2010, Mr. Goldstein is entitled to receive an annual base salary of $375,000 (“Base Salary”) and annual bonuses based on our net income (which bonus, commencing for 2010, may not be less than $10,000 per annum).  Mr. Goldstein’s annual base salary had been $350,000 from January 1, 2004 through December 31, 2009.  On August 25, 2008, the Company and Mr. Goldstein entered into an amendment (the “2008 Amendment 221;) to the Goldstein Employment Agreement. The 2008 Amendment entitles Mr. Goldstein to devote certain time to Kingstone Insurance Company) (“KICO”) (formerly known as Commercial Mutual Insurance Company) to fulfill his duties and responsibilities as Chairman of the Board and Chief Investment Officer of KICO. Such permitted activity is subject to a reduction in Base Salary under the Goldstein Employment Agreement on a dollar-for-dollar basis to the extent of the salary payable by KICO to Mr. Goldstein pursuant to his KICO employment contract, which, effective July 1, 2009, is $157,500 per year.  KICO is a New York property and casualty insurer.  Effective July 1, 2009, we acquired 100% of the stock of KICO.  Pursuant to an amendment entered into with Mr. Goldstein on March 24, 2010 (the “2010 Amendment”), in addition to the increase in his Base Salary to $375,000 and minimum $10,000 annual bonus, as noted above, the expiration date of the agreement was extended from June 30, 2010 to December 31, 2014, the Company issued to Mr. Goldstein 50,000 shares of common stock and granted to him a five year option for the purchase of 188,865 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $2.50 per share, exercisable to the extent of 25% on the date of grant and each of the initial three anniversary dates of the grant.  In connection with the stock option grant, the Company increased the number of shares authorized to be issued pursuant to its 2005 Equity Participation Plan from 300,000 to 550,000, subject to shareholder approval. The option grant to Mr. Goldstein is also subject to such shareholder approval to the extent that additional authorized shares under the plan are required to satisfy his option. Pursuant to the 2010 Amendment, the Company also agreed that, under certain circumstances follo wing a change of control of Kingstone Companies, Inc. and the termination of his employment, all of Mr. Goldstein’s outstanding options would become exercisable.

F-41

Chief Executive Officer (KICO)

KICO’s President and Chief Executive Officer, John D. Reiersen, is employed pursuant to an employment agreement effective as of November 13, 2006 and amended as of January 25, 2008 (together, the “Reiersen Agreement”). The Reiersen Agreement, which expires on December 31, 2011, may be terminated by KICO at any time with or without cause upon written notice. In the event of termination by KICO, Mr. Reiersen will be entitled to receive six months severance and accrued vacation up to a maximum of 50 days. Pursuant to the Reiersen Agreement, Mr. Reiersen is entitled to receive an annual base salary of $256,500 (with increases of 5% on each of January 1, 2010 and 2011), plus additional customary benefits.  Mr. Reiersen’s title as President and Chief Executive Officer of KICO is subject to approval by KICO’ s Board at its next annual meeting to be held in March 2011. Mr. Reiersen also receives a $2,000 annual fee for his position as a director of KICO.

Approval Required for Dividends from and Transactions with Subsidiary
In connection with the plan of conversion of CMIC, the Company has agreed with the Insurance Department that for a period of two years following the effective date of conversion of July 1, 2009, no dividend may be paid by KICO without the approval of the Insurance Department. The Company has also agreed with the Insurance Department that any intercompany transaction between itself and KICO must be filed with the Insurance Department 30 days prior to implementation.

Leases
The Company leases its executive office under a non-cancelable operating leases expiring at various dates through August 31, 2011. The lease is not renewable and includes additional rent for real estate taxes and other operating expenses. The landlord may terminate the lease with 30 days advance notice. The minimum future rentals under these lease commitments are as follows:
 Years ended December 31,   
2010 $22,800 
2011  3,625 
  $26,425 

Tax Audits
The audit of our state income tax return by New York State for the years ended December 31, 2005, 2006 and 2007 was completed in 2009. The audit resulted in an assessment of approximately $36,000 including interest, which was paid in 2009. The audit of our federal income tax return for the year ended December 31, 2005 was completed in 2008. The audit resulted in no changes to our tax return as filed.

F-42

Note 22 - Net Income (Loss) Per Common Share
Basic net earnings per common share is computed by dividing income (loss) available to common shareholders by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding. Diluted earnings per share reflect, in periods in which they have a dilutive effect, the impact of common shares issuable upon exercise of stock options, warrants and conversion of mandatorily redeemable preferred shares.  The computation of diluted earnings per share excludes those options, warrants and mandatorily redeemable preferred shares with an exercise price in excess of the average market price of the Company’s common shares during the periods presented.
For the year ended December 31, 2009 options and mandatorily redeemable preferred shares had an exercise price in excess of the average market price of the Company’s common shares during the period and as a result, the weighted average number of common shares used in the calculation of basic and diluted earnings per common share is the same, and have not been adjusted for the effects of 788,782 potential common shares from unexercised stock options and the conversion of convertible preferred shares.
For the year ended December 31, 2008, the Company recorded a loss available to common shareholders and, as a result, the weighted average number of common shares used in the calculation of basic and diluted loss per common share is the same, and have not been adjusted for the effects of 489,400 potential common shares from unexercised stock options and the conversion of convertible preferred shares, which were anti-dilutive for such period.
Note 23 - Discontinued Operations

Premium Financing

On February 1, 2008, ourthe Company’s wholly-owned subsidiary, Payments Inc. (“Payments”), sold its outstanding premium finance loan portfolio to Premium Financing Specialists, Inc. (“PFS”). The purchase price forUnder the acquired net loan portfolio was approximately $11,845,000, of which approximately $268,000 was paid to Payments, and the remainderterms of the purchase pricesale, Payments was satisfied by the assumption of liabilities, including the satisfaction of our premium finance revolving credit line obligation to M&T. Simultaneously with the closing, our revolving line of credit with M&T was terminated.

As additional consideration, Payments will be entitled to receive an amount based upon the net earnings generated by the acquired loan portfolio as it iswas collected. For the yearyears ended December 31, 2009 and 2008, Payments received approximately $255,000$18,000 and $63,000 based on the net earnings generated from collections of the acquired loan portfolio. Under the terms of the sale, PFS has agreed that, during the five year period ending January 31, 2013 (subject to automatic renewal for successive two year terms under certain circumstances), it will purchase, assume and service all eligible premium finance contracts originated by usthe Company in the states of New York and Pennsylvania.  In connection with such purchases, we will be entitled to receive a fee generally equal to a percentage of the amount financed.

As a result of the sale of the premium finance portfolio on February 1, 2008, the operating results of the premium financing operations for the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008 have been presented as discontinued operations.  Net assets and liabilities to be disposed of or liquidated, at their book value, have been separately classified in the accompanying balance sheets at d December 31, 2009 and 2008. Continuing operations of the premium financing operations only consists of placement fee revenue and any related expenses.

Summarized financial information of the premium financing business as discontinued operations for the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008 follows:
F-43


Years ended December 31, 2009  2008 
       
Premium finance revenue $-  $225,322 
         
Operating Expenses:        
General and administrative expenses  -   271,259 
Provision for finance receivable losses  -   - 
Depreciation and amortization  -   46,556 
Interest expense  -   45,181 
Total operating expenses  -   362,996 
         
Loss from operations  -   (137,674)
Loss on sale of premim financing portfolio  -   102,511 
Loss before provision for income taxes  -   (240,185)
Provision for income taxes  -   69,000 
         
Loss from discontinued operations,        
net of income taxes $-  $(309,185)
The components of assets and liabilities of the premium financing discontinued operations as of December 31, 2009 and 2008 are as follows:
December 31, 2009  2008 
       
Due from purchaser of premium finance portfolio $-  $18,291 
Total assets $-  $18,291 
         
Total liabilities $-  $- 

Retail Business

In December 2008, due to declining revenues and profits the Company decided to restructure its network of retail offices (the “Retail Business”). The plan of restructuring called for the closing of seven of the least profitable locations during the month of December 2008 and 2007the entry into negotiations to sell the remaining 19 locations in the Retail Business.
On April 17, 2009, the Company’s wholly-owned subsidiaries that owned and operated its 16 remaining Retail Business locations in New York State sold substantially all of their assets, including the book of business (the “New York Assets”).  The purchase price for the New York Assets was approximately $2,337,000, of which approximately $1,786,000 was paid at closing.  Promissory notes in the aggregate approximate original principal amount of $551,000 (the “New York Notes”) were also delivered at the closing. The New York Notes are payable in installments of approximately $73,000 on March 31, 2010 (which was paid), monthly installments of $50,000 each between April 30, 2010 and November 30, 2010 and a payment of approximately $105,000 on November 30, 2010, and provide for interest at the rate of 12.625% per annum. As additional consideration, the Company shall be entitled to receive through September 30, 2010 an additional amount equal to 60% of the net commissions derived from the book of business of six New York retail locations that were closed in 2008.

Effective June 30, 2009, the Company sold all of the outstanding stock of the subsidiary that operated its three remaining Pennsylvania stores (the “Pennsylvania Stock”).  The purchase price for the Pennsylvania Stock was approximately $397,000 which was paid by delivery of two promissory notes, one in the approximate principal amount of $238,000 and payable with interest at the rate of 9.375% per annum in 120 equal monthly installments, and the other in the approximate principal amount of $159,000 and payable with interest at the rate of 6% per annum in 60 monthly installments commencing August 10, 2011 (with interest only being payable prior to such date).

F-44

As a result of the restructuring in December 2008, the sale of the New York Assets on April 17, 2009 and the sale of the Pennsylvania Stock effective June 30, 2009, the operating results of the Retail Business operations for years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008 have been presented as discontinued operations.  Net assets and liabilities to be disposed of or liquidated, at their book value, have been separately classified in the accompanying balance sheets at December 31, 20082009 and 2007. Continuing operations of our premium financing operations will only consist of placement fee revenue and any related expenses.2008.

Retail Business
In December 2008, due to declining revenues and profits we decided to restructure our network of retail offices (the “Retail Business”). The plan of restructuring called for closing seven of our least profitable locations during the month of December 2008, and to enter into negotiations to sell the remaining 19 locations in our Retail Business.
On March 30, 2009, an asset purchase agreement (the “APA”) was fully executed pursuant to which we agreed to sell substantially all of the assets, including the book of business, of our 16 remaining Retail Business locations that we own in New York State (the “Assets”). The closing of the sale of the Assets is subject to a number of conditions.  As a result of the restructuring in December 2008, and the APA on March 30, 2009, the operating resultsSummarized financial information of the Retail Business as discontinued operations for the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008 follows:
Years ended December 31, 2009  2008 
       
Commissions and fee revenue $1,029,460  $4,042,441 
         
Operating Expenses:        
General and administrative expenses  1,226,418   3,894,183 
Depreciation and amortization  59,481   212,861 
Interest expense  12,104   41,162 
Impairment of intangibles  49,470   393,600 
Total operating expenses  1,347,473   4,541,806 
         
Loss from operations  (318,013)  (499,365)
Gain on sale of business  (21,253)  - 
Loss before benefit from income taxes  (296,760)  (499,365)
(Benefit from) provision for income taxes  (76,499)  28,972 
         
Loss from discontinued operations,        
net of income taxes $(220,261) $(528,337)
The components of assets and 2007liabilities of the Retail Business discontinued operations as of December 31, 2009 and 2008 are as follows:
December 31, 2009  2008 
       
Accounts receivable $-  $404,180 
Other current assets  -   32,325 
Property and equipment, net  -   144,750 
Goodwill  -   2,207,658 
Other intangibles, net  -   75,666 
Other assets  -   30,277 
Total assets $-  $2,894,856 
         
Accounts payable and accrued expenses $26,000  $136,685 
Deferred income taxes  -   77,000 
Total liabilities $26,000  $213,685 
Franchise Business
Effective May 1, 2009, the Company sold all of the outstanding stock of the subsidiaries that operated its DCAP franchise business (collectively, the “Franchise Stock”). The purchase price for the Franchise Stock was $200,000 which was paid by delivery of a promissory note in such principal amount (the “Franchise Note”).  The Franchise Note is payable in installments of $50,000 on May 15, 2009, $50,000 on May 1, 2010 and $100,000 on May 1, 2011 and provides for interest at the rate of 5.25% per annum.  A principal of the buyer is the son-in-law of Morton L. Certilman, one of the Company’s principal shareholders.
F-45

As a result of the sale of the Franchise Stock, the operating results of the franchise business operations for the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008 have been presented as discontinued operations.  Net assets and liabilities to be disposed of or liquidated, at their book value, have been separately classified in the accompanying balance sheets at December 31, 2009 and 2008.
Summarized financial information of the franchise business as discontinued operations for the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008 and 2007.follows:
 
F-23
Years ended December 31, 2009  2008 
       
Commissions and fee revenue $213,831  $485,922 
         
Operating Expenses:        
General and administrative expenses  179,813   672,233 
Depreciation and amortization  2,061   32,850 
Total operating expenses  181,874   705,083 
         
Income (loss) from operations  31,957   (219,161)
Loss on sale of business  77,754   - 
Income (loss) before provision for income taxes  (45,797)  (219,161)
Provision for income taxes  -   - 
         
Loss from discontinued operations,        
net of income taxes $(45,797) $(219,161)
DCAP GROUP, INC. AND
SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Financial Statements
Years EndedThe components of assets and liabilities of the franchise business discontinued operations as of December 31, 2009 and 2008 and 2007are as follows:
December 31, 2009  2008 
       
Accounts receivable $-  $134,522 
Other current assets  -   101,678 
Deferred income taxes  -   16,000 
Property and equipment, net  -   7,876 
Other assets  -   4,996 
Total assets $-  $265,072 
         
Accounts payable and accrued expenses $-  $9,809 
Total liabilities $-  $9,809 

In March 2009, we commenced negotiations to sell the remaining three Retail Business locations, which are located in Pennsylvania.

Summarized Financial Information of Discontinued Operations

Summarized financial information of consolidated discontinued operations for the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008 and 2007 follows (in thousands):follows:

Years Ended December 31,       2008        2007 
                   
  Retail  Premium     Retail  Premium    
  Business  Finance  Total  Business  Finance  Total 
                   
Commissions and fee revenue $4,042  $-  $4,042  $5,096  $-  $5,096 
Premium finance revenue  -   225   225   -   3,167   3,167 
Total revenue  4,042   225   4,267   5,096   3,167   8,263 
                         
Operating Expenses:                        
General and administrative expenses  3,895   182   4,077   4,479   1,432   5,911 
Provision for finance receivable losses  -   89   89   -   472   472 
Depreciation and amortization  212   47   259   204   100   304 
Interest expense  41   45   86   44   646   690 
Impairment of intangibles  394   -   394   95   -   95 
Total operating expenses  4,542   363   4,905   4,822   2,650   7,472 
                         
(Loss) income from operations  (500)  (138)  (638)  274   517   791 
(Loss) gain on sale of business  -   (102)  (102)  66   -   66 
(Loss) income before (benefit) provision                        
for income taxes  (500)  (240)  (740)  340   517   857 
(Benefit from) provision for                        
income taxes  (28)  69   41   193   246   439 
                         
(Loss) income from discontinued                        
operations, net of income taxes $(472) $(309) $(781) $147  $271  $418 

F-24 
F-46

 
DCAP GROUP, INC. AND
SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Financial Statements
Years ended December 31, 2009  2008 
       
Commissions and fee revenue $1,243,291  $4,528,363 
Premium finance revenue  -   225,322 
Total revenue  1,243,291   4,753,685 
         
Operating Expenses:        
General and administrative expenses  1,406,231   4,837,675 
Provision for finance receivable losses  -   - 
Depreciation and amortization  61,542   292,267 
Interest expense  12,104   86,343 
Impairment of intangibles  49,470   393,600 
Total operating expenses  1,529,347   5,609,885 
         
Loss from operations  (286,056)  (856,200)
Loss on sale of businesses  56,501   102,511 
Loss before benefit from income taxes  (342,557)  (958,711)
(Benefit from) provision for income taxes  (76,499)  97,972 
         
Loss from discontinued operations,        
net of income taxes $(266,058) $(1,056,683)
Years Ended December 31, 2008 and 2007

The components of assets and liabilities of consolidated discontinued operations as of December 31, 20082009 and 20072008 are as follows (in thousands):follows:
 
December 31,       2008        2007  2009  2008 
 Retail  Premium     Retail  Premium          
 Business  Finance  Total  Business  Finance  Total 
                  
Accounts receivable $404  $-  $404  $587  $-  $587  $-  $538,702 
Finance contracts receivable, net  -   -   -   -   12,499   12,499 
Due from purchaser of premium                        
finance portfolio  -   18   18   -   -   - 
Due from purchaser of premium finance portfolio  -   18,291 
Other current assets  32   -   32   5   32   37   -   134,003 
Deferred income taxes  -   -   -   -   69   69   -   16,000 
Property and equipment, net  145   -   145   309   3   312   -   152,626 
Goodwill  2,208   -   2,208   2,601   -   2,601   -   2,207,658 
Other intangibles, net  75   -   75   151   -   151   -   75,666 
Other assets  31   -   31   48   48   96   -   35,273 
Total assets $2,895  $18  $2,913  $3,701  $12,651  $16,352  $-  $3,178,219 
                                
Revolving credit line $-  $-  $-  $-  $9,488  $9,488 
Accounts payable and accrued expenses  137   -   137   60   140   200  $26,000  $146,494 
Premiums payable  -   -   -   -   2,889   2,889 
Deferred income taxes  77   -   77   105   -   105   -   77,000 
Total liabilities $214  $-  $214  $165  $12,517  $12,682  $26,000  $223,494 
 
Summary of Significant Accounting Policies of Discontinued Operations

Finance income, fees and receivables - For ourIn the discontinued premium finance operations, we used the interest method was used to recognize interest income over the life of each loan in accordance with SFAS No. 91, "AccountingGAAP guidance for Nonrefundable Feesaccounting for nonrefundable fees and Costs Associatedcosts associated with Originatingoriginating or Acquiring Loans and Initial Direct Costs of Leases."

acquiring loans. Upon the establishment of a premium finance contract, wethe Company recorded the gross loan payments as a receivable with a corresponding reduction for deferred interest. The deferred interest was amortized to interest income using the interest method over the life of each loan. The weighted average interest rate charged with respect to financed insurance policies was approximately 26.1% and 26.4% per annum for the yearsyear ended December 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively.

2008. Upon completion of collectioncollecti on efforts, after cancellation of the underlying insurance policies, any uncollected earned interest or fees were charged off.

Allowance for finance receivable losses - Customers who purchase insurance policies are often unable to pay the premium in a lump sum and, therefore, require extended payment terms. Premium financing involves making a loan to the customer that is backed by the unearned portion of the insurance premiums being financed. No credit checks were made prior to the decision to extend credit to a customer. Losses on finance receivables included an estimate of future credit losses on premium finance accounts. Credit losses on premium finance accounts occur when the unearned premiums received from the insurer upon cancellation of a financed policy are inadequate to pay the balance of the premium finance account. After collection attempts were exhausted, the remaining account balance, including unrealized interest, was written off. We reviewed historical trends of such losses relative to finance receivable balances to develop estimates of future losses. However, actual write-offs may differ materially from the write-off estimates that we used. For the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007, the provision for finance receivable losses was approximately $89,000 and $472,000, respectively, and actual principal write-offs for such periods, net of actual and anticipated recoveries of previous write-offs, were approximately $50,000 and $522,000, respectively.
 
F-25
F-47

DCAP GROUP, INC. AND
SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Financial Statements
Years Ended December 31, 2008 and 2007
Deferred loan costs - Deferred loan costs were amortized on a straight-line basis over the related term of the loan.

Concentration of credit riskAll finance contracts receivable were repayable in less than one year. In the event of a default by the borrower, we were entitled to cancel the underlying insurance policy financed and receive a refund for the unused term of such policy from the insurance carrier. We structure the repayment terms in an attempt to minimize principal losses on finance contract receivables.

Finance contract receivables - A summary of the changes of the allowance for finance receivable losses is as follows:
December 31, 2008  2007 
       
Balance, beginning of year $173,612  $205,269 
Provision for finance receivable losses  85,672   472,266 
Charge-offs  (52,920)  (503,923)
Sale of portfolio  (206,364)  - 
Balance, end of year $-  $173,612 
         
Finance receivables were collateralized by the unearned premiums of the related insurance policies.

Revolving credit facility - On July 28, 2006, we and our premium finance subsidiary, Payments, Inc., entered into a revolving line of credit (the “Revolver”) with M&T, which provided for a credit line to $20,000,000. The Revolver bore interest, at our option, at either M&T’s prime lending rate or LIBOR plus 2.25%, and was scheduled to mature on June 30, 2008. The Revolver was paid in full and terminated on February 1, 2008 upon the closing of the sale of our premium finance loan portfolio.

The line of credit also allowed for a $2,500,000 term loan (of the $20,000,000 credit line availability) to be used to provide liquidity for ongoing working capital purposes (the “Term Loan”).  Any draws against the term line bore interest at LIBOR plus 2.75%.  In July 2006, we made our first draw against the term line of $1,300,000.  The draw was repayable in quarterly principal installments of $130,000 each, commencing September 1, 2006.  The remaining principal balance of the Term Loan was payable on June 30, 2008. In June 2008, the maturity date of the Term Loan was extended to December 31, 2008. Principal payments of $55,174 were due on the first day of each month and one final payment on the maturity date. Interest was payable monthly.  The Term Loan was paid in full in December 2008.
F-26
DCAP GROUP, INC. AND
SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Financial Statements
Years Ended December 31, 2008 and 2007

The Revolver provided for our CEO’s obligation on an unlimited wind-down guaranty and his personal guaranty as to misrepresentations that relate to dishonest or fraudulent acts committed by him or known but not timely reported by him. The Revolver was secured by substantially all of the assets of our premium finance subsidiary, Payments, Inc., and was guaranteed by DCAP Group, Inc. and its subsidiaries.

Commission and fee income In our discontinued operations, we recognize commission revenue was recognized in from insurance policies at the beginning of the contract period. Refunds of commissions on the cancellation of insurance policies arewere reflected at the time of cancellation. Fees for income tax preparation arewere recognized when the services are completed. Automobile club dues arewere recognized equally over the contract period.

Property and equipment - - In our discontinued operations, property and equipment are stated at cost. Depreciation is provided using the straight-line method over the estimated useful livesFranchise fee revenue on initial franchisee fees was recognized when substantially all of the related assets. Leasehold improvements are being amortized usingCompany’s contractual requirements under the straight-line method overfranchise agreement were completed. Franchisees also paid a monthly franchise fee plus an applicable percentage of advertising expense. The Company was obligated to provide marketing and training support to each franchisee.
Note 24 - Subsequent Events
Loss from Uninsured Bank Deposits
In March 2010, the estimated useful livesCompany was notified by the FDIC that a bank in which the Company had deposits totaling approximately $497,000 had failed. As of the related assets or the remaining term of the lease.

Goodwill and intangible assets - - Goodwill represents the excess of the purchase price over fair value of identifiable net assets acquired from business acquisitions. In accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standard (“SFAS”) No. 142, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets,” goodwill is no longer amortized, but is reviewed for impairment on an annual basis and between annual tests in certain circumstances. We conduct our annual impairment test for goodwillDecember 31, 2009, account balances at the beginningfailed bank consisted of the first quarter. If the fair valuea $100,000 certificate of the reporting unit to which goodwill relates is less than the carrying amount of those operations, including unamortized goodwill, the carrying amount of goodwill is reduced accordinglydeposit and a money market account with a charge to impairment expense. The fair valuebalance of $396,151. For the reporting unit is a multiple of annual revenue, which is the accepted industry standard for valuing storefront insurance agencies. We performed the required impairment test for fiscal years 2008 and 2007 and found the carrying value of goodwill atyear ended December 31, 2008 to be approximately $394,0002009, the loss in excess of the fair value of the reporting unit. Accordingly, our results of discontinued operationsFDIC insured limits was $246,151. The loss from uninsured bank deposits was recorded as OTTI for the year ended December 31, 2008 includes2009.
Notes Payable
From January 2010 through March 2010, the Company borrowed an impairment chargeadditional $400,000 under the terms set forth in the 2009 Notes, of which $150,000 was borrowed from the IRA of Barry Goldstein (See Note 14 - Long Term Debt).
Employment Agreements and Stock Option Plan
In March 2010, the Company and Mr. Goldstein entered into an amendment to goodwill of $394,000. There can be no assurance that future goodwill impairment tests will not resultthe Goldstein Employment Agreement (See Note 21 - Commitments and Contingencies).
Loss and Loss Adjustment Expenses
In March 2010, a severe storm hit the New York City area, which has resulted in a chargeapproximately 250 claims to earnings.

Other intangibles - SFAS No. 142 requires purchased intangible assets other than goodwill to be amortized over their useful lives unless those lives are determined to be indefinite. Purchased intangible assets are carried at cost less accumulated amortization. In our discontinued operations, definite-lived intangible assets, which include customer and phone lists, have been assigned an estimated finite life and are amortized on a straight-line basis over periods ranging from 3 to 15 years. Ifdate. Although the valueexact amount of the intangible assetloss is determined tocurrently not determinable until all claims are received and processed, the Company estimates total claims will be impaired, the assetapproximately $1,500,000. The Company is written down to the current fair value.

Other intangible assets in our discontinued operations consistreinsured for 75% of the following:losses from this storm.

 December 31, 2008  2007 
       
 Customer lists $554,425  $554,425 
 Accumulated amortization  479,425   403,515 
         
 Balance, end of year $75,000  $150,910 
         

F-27 
F-48

 
DCAP GROUP, INC. AND
SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Financial Statements
Years Ended December 31, 2008 and 2007
The aggregate amortization expense for the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007 was approximately $75,000 and $103,000, respectively. As of December 31, 2007, we no longer utilized the vanity telephone numbers included in intangible assets. The balance of $94,914 was written off and is included in impairment of intangible assets in our discontinued operations for the year ended December 31, 2007.

Estimated amortization expense for the five years subsequent to December 31, 2008 is as follows:

 Years Ending December 31, 
   
 200975,000

The remaining weighted-average amortization period as of December 31, 2008 is 1.0 year.

Advertising costs - Advertising costs are charged to discontinued operations when the advertising first takes place. Included in general and administrative expenses of discontinued operations are advertising costs approximating $144,000 and $333,000 for the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively.

Income taxes - Deferred tax assets and liabilities of discontinued operations are determined based upon the differences between financial reporting and tax bases of assets and liabilities, and are measured using the enacted tax rates and laws that will be in effect when the differences are expected to reverse.

Major insurance carriers - For the year ended December 31, 2008, revenue from major insurance carriers in excess of 10% of net revenues from our discontinued Retail Business consisted of the following:

Carrier% of Total Revenue
A33%
B17%

For the year ended December 31, 2007, revenue from major insurance carriers in excess of 10% of net revenues from our discontinued Retail Business consisted of the following:

Carrier% of Total Revenue
A40%
B14%

14. Fair Value of Financial Instruments

The methods and assumptions used to estimate the fair value of the following classes of financial instruments were:

Current Assets and Current Liabilities: The carrying values of cash, accounts receivables, finance contract receivables and payables and certain other short-term financial instruments approximate their fair value.
 
F-28
DCAP GROUP, INC. AND
SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Financial Statements
Years Ended December 31, 2008 and 2007

Long-Term Debt: The fair value of our long-term debt, including the current portion, was estimated using a discounted cash flow analysis, based on our assumed incremental borrowing rates for similar types of borrowing arrangements. The carrying amount of variable and fixed rate debt at December 31, 2008 and 2007 approximates fair value.

15. Retirement Plan

Qualified employees are eligible to participate in a salary reduction plan under Section 401(k) of the Internal Revenue Code. Participation in the plan is voluntary, and any participant may elect to contribute up to a maximum of $15,000 per year. For the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007, we matched 25% of the employees’ contribution up to 6%. Effective January 1, 2009, we no longer match employees’ contributions. Contributions for the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007 approximated $18,000 and $25,000, respectively.

16. Supplementary Information - Statement of Cash Flows

Cash paid during the years for:

Years Ended December 31, 2008  2007 
       
Interest $375,883  $463,305 
         
Income Taxes $23,350  $3,033 

17.        Subsequent Event

On March 30, 2009, an asset purchase agreement (the “APA”) was fully executed pursuant to which our wholly-owned subsidiaries, Barry Scott Agency, Inc. and DCAP Accurate, Inc. (collectively “Seller”), agreed to sell substantially all of their assets, including the book of business of the 16 Retail Business locations that we own in New York State (the “Assets”) to NII BSA LLC (“Buyer”). The closing of the sale of the Assets is subject to a number of conditions.  The purchase price for the Assets is approximately $2,337,000, of which approximately $1,786,000 is to be paid to Seller at closing, and the remainder of the purchase price is to be satisfied by the delivery of promissory notes in the aggregate amount of $551,000. As additional consideration, Seller will be entitled to receive through September 2010 an amount equal to 60% of the net commissions derived from the book of business of six retail locations that were closed in 2008.

As a result of our December 2008 plan of restructuring to close or sell our Retail Business locations, and the APA on March 30, 2009, our Retail Business has been presented as discontinued operations.

See Note 13.
F-29
SIGNATURES
 
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, there­unto duly authorized.
 
 
DCAP GROUP,KINGSTONE COMPANIES, INC.
 
Dated:  April 13, 20097, 2010
By:By  /s//s/ Barry B. Goldstein                                         
     Barry B. Goldstein                                           
     Chief Executive Officer
 
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
 
SignatureCapacityDate
   
 
/s/ Barry B. Goldstein
Barry B. Goldstein
President, Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer, Treasurer and Director (Principal Executive Officer)
 
April 13, 20097, 2010
 
/s/ Victor J. Brodsky
Victor J. Brodsky
 
Chief AccountingFinancial Officer and Secretary
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) and Secretary
 
April 13, 20097, 2010
 
/s/ Michael R. Feinsod
Michael R. Feinsod
 
Directors
Director
 
April 13, 20097, 2010
 
/s/ Jay M. Haft
Jay M. Haft
 
Director
 
April 13, 2009__, 2010
 
/s/ David A. Lyons
David A. Lyons
 
Director
 
April 13, 20097, 2010
 
/s/ Jack D. Seibald
Jack D. Seibald
 
Director
 
April 13, 20097, 2010