UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K
(Mark One)  
x ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 20142016
or
o TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from                                  to                                 
Commission File Number:    001-31911

American Equity Investment Life Holding Company
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Iowa
(State or other jurisdiction of Incorporation)
 
42-1447959
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
6000 Westown Parkway
West Des Moines, Iowa
(Address of principal executive offices)
 
50266
(Zip Code)
Registrant's telephone number, including area code:    (515) 221-0002
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
Title of each class Name of each exchange on which registered
Common stock, par value $1 New York Stock Exchange
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: Common Stock, par value $1
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes x    No o
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Act. Yes o    No x
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x    No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Website, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes x    No o
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of "large accelerated filer," "accelerated filer" and "smaller reporting company" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filer x
Accelerated filer o
Non-accelerated filer o
(Do not check if a smaller
reporting company)
Smaller reporting company o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act.) Yes o    No x
Aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common equity held by non-affiliates of the registrant was $1,759,747,273$1,133,734,418 based on the closing price of $24.60$14.25 per share, the closing price of the common stock on the New York Stock Exchange on June 30, 2014.2016.
Shares of common stock outstanding as of February 19, 2015: 76,877,42822, 2017: 88,279,845
Documents incorporated by reference: Portions of the registrant's definitive proxy statement for the annual meeting of shareholders to be held June 4, 2015,1, 2017, which will be filed within 120 days after December 31, 2014,2016, are incorporated by reference into Part III of this report.



AMERICAN EQUITY INVESTMENT LIFE HOLDING COMPANY
FORM 10-K FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 20142016
TABLE OF CONTENTS
 
 
 
 
 
 
Exhibit 12.1Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges 
Exhibit 21.2Subsidiaries of American Equity Investment Life Holding Company 
Exhibit 23.1Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm 
Exhibit 31.1Certification 
Exhibit 31.2Certification 
Exhibit 32.1Certification 
Exhibit 32.2Certification 




PART I

Item 1.    Business
Introduction
We are a leader in the development and sale of fixed index and fixed rate annuity products. We were incorporated in the state of Iowa on December 15, 1995. We issue fixed annuity and life insurance products through our wholly-owned life insurance subsidiaries, American Equity Investment Life Insurance Company ("American Equity Life"), American Equity Investment Life Insurance Company of New York and Eagle Life Insurance Company ("Eagle Life"). OurWe have one business consists primarilysegment which represents our core business comprised of the sale of fixed index and fixed rate annuities and, accordingly, we have only one business segment.annuities. Our business strategy is to focusfocused on growing our annuity businesspolicyholder funds and earnearning predictable returns by managing investment spreads and investment risk. We are licensed to sell our products in 50 states and the District of Columbia. Throughout this report, unless otherwise specified or the context otherwise requires, all references to "American Equity", the "Company", "we", "our" and similar references are to American Equity Investment Life Holding Company and its consolidated subsidiaries.
Investor related information, including periodic reports filed on Forms 10-K, 10-Q and 8-K and allany amendments to such reports may be found on our internet website at www.american-equity.com as soon as reasonably practicable after such reports are filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC"). In addition, we have available on our website our: (i) code of business conduct and ethics; (ii) audit committee charter; (iii) compensation committee charter; (iv) nominating/nominating and corporate governance committee charter;charter and (v) corporate governance guidelines. The information incorporated herein by reference is also electronically accessible from the SEC's website at www.sec.gov.
Annuity Market Overview
Our target market includes the group of individuals ages 45-75 who are seeking to accumulate tax-deferred savings or create guaranteed lifetime income. We believe that significant growth opportunities exist for annuity products because of favorable demographic and economic trends. According to the U.S. Census Bureau, there were approximately 39 million Americans age 65 and older in 2010, representing 13% of the U.S. population and this group has grown to 44.7 million in 2013. By 2030, this sector of the population is expected to increase to 20% of the total population. Our fixed index and fixed rate annuity products are particularly attractive to this group due to their principal protection, competitive rates of credited interest, tax-deferred growth, guaranteed lifetime income and alternative payout options. Our competitive fixed index and fixed rate annuity products have enabled us to enjoy favorable growth in recent years and since our formation.
According to Wink's Sales and Market Report published by Wink, Inc., total industry sales of fixed index annuities increased 28.9%19.8% to $34.9$44.9 billion for the first three quarters of 20142016 from $27.1$37.5 billion for the first three quarters of 2013, and increased 13.4% to $38.6 billion in 2013 from $34.0 billion in 2012.2015. Total industry sales of fixed index annuities have increased 44%64% over the five year period from 20082010 to 2013,2015 (data provided in the following table according to Wink's Sales and Market Report published by Wink, Inc.), which we believe is attributable to more Americans reaching retirement age and seeking products that will provide principal protection and guaranteed lifetime income.
 For the Year Ended December 31,
 2015 2014 2013 2012 2011
 (Dollars in thousands)
Total industry sales of fixed index annuities$53,069,850
 $46,896,350
 $38,646,864
 $33,975,442
 $32,387,045
Increase from prior year6,173,500
 8,249,486
 4,671,422
 1,588,397
 41,481
Increase from prior year13.2% 21.3% 13.7% 4.9% 0.1%
Strategy
Our business strategy is to grow our annuity business and earn predictable returns by managing investment spreads and investment risk. Key elements of thisexecuting our strategy include the following:
Expand and Enhance our Current Independent AgencyDistribution Network.  We believe that our successfulcurrently distribute through a number of distribution channels, including independent agents, broker/dealers, banks and registered investment advisors. American Equity Life has relationships with approximately 3835 national marketing organizations, represent a significant competitive advantage.through which nearly 25,000 independent agents are under contract. Our objective is to improve the productivity and efficiency of our coreindependent agent distribution channel by focusing our marketing and recruiting efforts on those independent agents capable of selling $1 million or more of annuity premium annually. This level of production qualifies them for our Gold Eagle program which was introduced at the beginning of 2007. We believe the Gold Eagle program has been effective as evidenced by the number of qualified Gold Eagle agents ranging from 945 to as many as 1,045 during the last three calendar years. Our Gold Eagle agents accounted for 63% of total production in 2014, 61% of total production in 2013 and 59% of total production in 2012. Agents who produce at least $1 million in annuity premium in a year qualify for Gold Eagle status and receive benefits such as express mail discounts. Agents who produce at least $2 million in annuity premium in a year earn cash and equity-based compensation. The equity-based incentive compensation component of our Gold Eagle program is unique in our industry and distinguishes us from our competitors. We will also be alert for opportunities to establish relationships with successful national marketing organizations and agents not presently associated with us. We continue to grow distribution through broker/dealers, banks and registered investment advisors. According to Wink's Sales and Market Report published by Wink, Inc., sales of fixed index annuities through broker/dealers and banks represented almost 35% of industry sales in the third quarter of 2016. Eagle Life is focused solely on the broker/dealer, bank and registered investment advisor channel and is developing a network of broker/dealers, banks and registered investment advisors that have the ability to distribute fixed index and fixed rate annuity products in large volume. We also offer broker/dealer and bank friendly products for those broker/dealers and banks that choose to associate with us and willthrough American Equity Life. We continue to strive to provide all of our marketersdistribution partners with the highest quality service possible.

Continue to Introduce Innovative and Competitive Products.  We intend to be at the forefront of the fixed index and fixed rate annuity industry in developing and introducing innovative and new competitive products. We were one of the first companies to offer a fixed index annuity that allows a choice among interest crediting strategies which includesincluding both equity and bond indices as well as a traditional fixed rate strategy. We were also one of the first companies to include a lifetime income benefit rider with our fixed index annuities. In 2014, we introducedannuities and first to have a volatility control index crediting strategy and we modified our lifetime income benefit rider to become the first company with gender-based income payments. Life insurance and single-premium immediate annuities have gender-based mortality rates, and it is a natural progression to do the same with the lifetime income benefit rider as well. We believe that our continued focus on anticipating and being responsive to the product needs of our independent agents and policyholdersthe ever-growing population of retirees will lead to increased customer loyalty, revenues and profitability.

1


Use our Expertise to Achieve Targeted Spreads on Annuity Products.  We have had a successful track record in achieving the targeted spreads on our annuity products. This historical success has been challenged in the current extended low interest rate environment. However, we intend to continue to leverage our experience and expertise in managing the investment spread during a range of interest rate environments to achieve, or work towards achieving, our targeted spreads.
Maintain our Profitability Focus and Improve Operating Efficiency.  We are committed to improving our profitability by advancing the scope and sophistication of our investment management and spread capabilities and continuously seeking out efficiencies within our operations. We have implemented competitive incentive programs forThe expanded use of technological resources will continue to allow us to improve our national marketing organizations, agentsprocesses, scalability and employees to stimulate performance.response times.
Take Advantage of the Growing Popularity of Index Products.  We believe that the growing popularity of fixed index annuity products that allow equity and bond market participation without the risk of loss of the premium deposit presents an attractive opportunity to grow our business. The popularity of fixed index annuity products has increased in recent years with the availability of lifetime income benefit riders that provide an attractive alternative for converting accumulated retirement savings into lifetime income. We intend to capitalize on our reputation as a leading provider of fixed index annuities in this expanding segment of the annuity market.
Focus on High Quality Service to Agents and Policyholders.  We have maintained high quality personal service as one of our highest priorities since the inception of our businesscompany and continue to strive for an unprecedented level of timely and accurate service to both our agents and policyholders. Examples of our high quality service include answering our phone calls by a live person answering phone calls and issuing policies within 24 hours of receiving the application if the paperwork is in good order. We believe high quality service is one of our strongest competitive advantagesadvantages.
Be Proactive in the Changing Regulatory Environment. We have been a strong and vocal defender of our products and our industry through continued regulatory challenges and have long been an advocate for appropriate regulation. We intend to enhanceremain flexible and responsive to the ever changing regulatory environment and will continue to engage with our digital customer service experience for agentskey regulators to ensure policyholder protections are in place and policyholders.
Expandadequate while permitting continued access to our Distribution Channels.  We formed Eagle Life with the vision of developing a network of broker/dealers, banks and registered investment advisors that have the ability to distribute fixed index and fixed rate annuity products in large volume. Sales of fixed index annuities through broker/dealers and banks have been growing and represented almost 16% of industry sales in the third quarter of 2014 compared to 8.3% in the third quarter of 2012. Recently, we introduced broker/dealer and bank friendly products for American Equity Life for those broker/dealers and banks who choose to associate with us through American Equity Life.much needed retirement products.
Products
Annuities offer our policyholders a tax-deferred means of accumulating retirement savings, as well as a reliable source of income during the payout period. When our policyholders contributedeposit cash to annuities, we account for these receipts as policy benefit reserves in the liability section of our consolidated balance sheet. The annuity deposits collected, by product type, during the three most recent fiscal years are as follows:
 Year Ended December 31, Year Ended December 31,
 2014 2013 2012 2016 2015 2014
Product Type 
Deposits
Collected
 
Deposits
as a % of
Total
 
Deposits
Collected
 
Deposits
as a % of
Total
 
Deposits
Collected
 
Deposits
as a % of
Total
 
Deposits
Collected
 
Deposits
as a % of
Total
 
Deposits
Collected
 
Deposits
as a % of
Total
 
Deposits
Collected
 
Deposits
as a % of
Total
 (Dollars in thousands) (Dollars in thousands)
Fixed index annuities $3,999,439
 96% $3,882,424
 92% $3,434,226
 87% $5,724,758
 80% $6,791,689
 96% $3,999,439
 96%
Annual reset fixed rate annuities 57,273
 1% 71,944
 2% 98,821
 3% 64,317
 1% 45,182
 1% 57,273
 1%
Multi-year fixed rate annuities 103,293
 2% 205,978
 5% 249,228
 6% 1,303,273
 18% 214,356
 3% 103,293
 2%
Single premium immediate annuities 24,580
 1% 52,142
 1% 164,657
 4% 35,851
 1% 32,752
 % 24,580
 1%
 $4,184,585
 100% $4,212,488
 100% $3,946,932
 100% $7,128,199
 100% $7,083,979
 100% $4,184,585
 100%
Fixed Index Annuities
Fixed index annuities allow policyholders to earn index credits based on the performance of a particular index without the risk of loss of their principal. Most of these products allow policyholders to transfer funds once a year among several different crediting strategies, including one or more index based strategies and a traditional fixed rate strategy. Approximately 95%88%, 97%89% and 97%89% of our fixed index annuity sales for the years ended December 31, 2014, 20132016, 2015 and 2012,2014, respectively, were "premium bonus" products. The initial annuity deposit on these policies is increased at issuance by a specified premium bonus ranging from 3% to 10%. Generally, the surrender charge and bonus vesting provisions of our policies are structured such that we have comparable protection from early termination between bonus and non-bonus products.

The annuity contract value is equal to the sum of premiums paid, premium bonuses and interest credited ("index credits" for funds allocated to an index based strategy), which is based upon an overall limit (or "cap") or a percentage (the "participation rate") of the annual appreciation (based in certain situations on monthly averages or monthly point-to-point calculations) in a recognized index or benchmark. Caps and participation rates limit the amount of annual interest the policyholder may earn in any one contract year and may be adjusted by us annually subject to stated minimums. Caps generally range from 1% to 12% and participation rates range from 10% to 100%. In addition, some products have a spread or "asset fee" generally ranging from 1.0%0.75% to 3.5%4.0%, which is deducted from annual interest to be credited. For products with asset fees, if the annual appreciation in the index does not exceed the asset fee, the policyholder's index credit is zero. The minimum guaranteed surrender values are equal to no less than 87.5% of the premium collected plus interest credited at an annual rate ranging from 1% to 3%.

2

Table of Contents

Fixed Rate Annuities
Fixed rate deferred annuities include annual reset and multi-year rate guaranteed products. Our annual reset fixed rate annuities have an annual interest rate (the "crediting rate") that is guaranteed for the first policy year. After the first policy year, we have the discretionary ability to change the crediting rate once annually to any rate at or above a guaranteed minimum rate. Our multi-year rate guaranteed annuities are similar to our annual reset products except that the initial crediting rate is guaranteed for up to seven years before it may be changed at our discretion. The minimum guaranteed rate on our annual reset fixed rate deferred annuities ranges from 1% to 4% and the initial guaranteed rate on our multi-year rate guaranteed policies ranges from 1.75%1.7% to 4.1%3.75%.
The initial crediting rate is largely a function of the interest rate we can earn on invested assets acquired with new annuity deposits and the rates offered on similar products by our competitors. For subsequent adjustments to crediting rates, we take into account the yield on our investment portfolio, annuity surrender and withdrawal assumptions and crediting rate history for particular groups of annuity policies with similar characteristics. As of December 31, 2014,2016, crediting rates on our outstanding fixed rate deferred annuities generally ranged from 1.1%1.0% to 4.1%4.0%. The average crediting rates on our outstanding annual reset and multi-year rate guaranteed fixed rate deferred annuities at December 31, 20142016 were 2.32%1.99% and 2.98%2.74%, respectively.
We also sell single premium immediate annuities ("SPIAs"). Our SPIAs are designed to provide a series of periodic payments for a fixed period of time or for life, according to the policyholder's choice at the time of issue. The amounts, frequency and length of time of the payments are fixed at the outset of the annuity contract. SPIAs are often purchased by persons at or near retirement age who desire a steady stream of payments over a future period of years. The implicit interest rate on SPIAs is based on market conditions when the policy is issued. The implicit interest rate on our outstanding SPIAs averaged 2.30%2.61% at December 31, 2014.2016.
Withdrawal Options—Fixed Index and Fixed Rate Annuities
Policyholders are typically permitted penalty-free withdrawals up to 10% of the contract value in each year after the first year, subject to limitations. Withdrawals in excess of allowable penalty-free amounts are assessed a surrender charge during a penalty period which ranges from 6 to 17 years for fixed index annuities and 5 to 15 years for fixed rate annuities from the date the policy is issued. This surrender charge initially ranges from 4.7%7% to 20% for fixed index annuities and 8% to 20% for fixed rate annuities of the contract value and generally decreases by approximately one-half to two percentage points per year during the surrender charge period. For certain policies, the premium bonus is considered in the establishment of the surrender charge percentages. For other policies, there is a vesting schedule ranging from 10 to 14 years that applies to the premium bonus and any interest earned on that premium bonus. Surrender charges and bonus vesting are set at levels aimed at protecting us from loss on early terminations and reducing the likelihood of policyholders terminating their policies during periods of increasing interest rates. This practice enhances our ability to maintain profitability on such policies. Policyholders may elect to take the proceeds of the annuity either in a single payment or in a series of payments for life, for a fixed number of years or a combination of these payment options. Information on surrender charge protection and net account values are as follows:
  For the Year Ended December 31,
  2016 2015 2014
  (Dollars in thousands)
Annuity Surrender Charges:      
Average years at issue 13.5 13.7 13.8
Average years remaining 8.6 9.1 9.2
Average surrender charge percentage remaining 13.8% 14.3% 14.7%
Annuity Account Value (net of coinsurance) $45,204,015
 $41,249,647
 $35,363,041
Beginning in July 2007, substantially all of our fixed index annuity policies and many of our annual reset fixed rate deferred annuities were issued with a lifetime income benefit rider. This rider provides an additional liquidity option to policyholders. With the lifetime income benefit rider, a policyholder can elect to receive guaranteed payments for life from their contract without requiring them to annuitize their contract value. The amount of the living income benefit available is determined by the growth in the policy's income account value as defined in the rider (4.0%(3.0% to 8.0%), which is selected by the policyholder at the time of purchase, and the policyholder's age at the time the policyholder elects to begin receiving living income benefit payments. As discussed above, in 2014, we modified our lifetime income benefit rider with gender-based income payouts. Lifetime income benefit payments may be stopped and restarted at the election of the policyholder. During 2013, we introduced new versions of our lifetime income benefit rider that had an optional wellbeing benefit or optional death benefit. Policyholders have the choice of selecting a rider with a base level of benefit for no explicit fee or paying a fee for a rider that has a higher level of benefits.benefits, and beginning in 2013 we introduced products where the addition of a rider to the policy is completely optional. Rider fees range from 0.30% to 1.00%. of the policy's income account value.

Life Insurance
These products include traditional ordinary and term, universal life and other interest-sensitive life insurance products. We have approximately $2.2$2.0 billion of life insurance in force as of December 31, 2014. We intend to continue offering life insurance products for individual and group markets.2016. Premiums related to this business accounted for less than 1% of revenues for the years ended December 31, 2014, 20132016, 2015 and 2012.2014.
Investments/Spread Management
Investment activities are an integral part of our business, and net investment income is a significant component of our total revenues. Profitability of our annuity products is significantly affected by spreads between interest yields on investments, the cost of options to fund the annual index credits on our fixed index annuities and rates credited on our fixed rate annuities and the fixed rate strategy in our fixed index annuities. We manage the index-based risk component of our fixed index annuities by purchasing call options on the applicable indices to fund the annual index credits on these annuities and by adjusting the caps, participation rates and asset fees on policy anniversary dates to reflect the change in the cost of such options which varies based on market conditions. All options are purchased on the respective policy anniversary dates, and new options are purchased on each of the anniversary dates to fund the next annual index credits. All credited rates on annual reset fixed rate deferred annuities and the fixed rate strategy in fixed index annuities may be changed annually, subject to minimum guarantees. Changes in caps, participation rates and asset fees on fixed index annuities and crediting rates on fixed rate and fixed index annuities may not be sufficient to maintain targeted investment spreads in all economic and market environments. In addition, competition and other factors, including the potential for increases in surrenders and withdrawals, may limit our ability to adjust or to maintain caps, participation rates, asset fees and crediting rates at levels necessary to avoid narrowing of spreads under certain market conditions.

3

Table of Contents

For additional information regarding the composition of our investment portfolio and our interest rate risk management, see Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Financial Condition—Investments, Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk and Note 3 to our audited consolidated financial statements.
MarketingMarketing/Distribution
We market our products through a variable cost brokerage distribution network of approximately 38including, independent agents through national marketing organizations, broker/dealers, banks and through them, approximately 30,000 independent agents.registered investment advisors. We emphasize high quality service to our agents and policyholders along with the prompt payment of commissions to our agents. We believe this has been significant in building excellent relationships with our independent agency force.distribution network.
Our independent agents and agencies range in profile from national sales organizations to personal producing general agents. We actively recruit new agents and terminate those agents who have not produced business for us in recent periods and are unlikely to sell our products in the future. In our recruitment efforts, we emphasize that agents have direct access to our executive officers, giving us an edge in recruiting over larger and foreign-owned competitors. We also emphasize our products, service and our Gold Eagle program which provides unique cashfocused fixed rate and equity-based incentives to those agents that reach certain benchmarks offixed index annuity premium annually. Agents who produce at least $1 million in annuity premium in a year qualify for Gold Eagle status and receive benefits such as express mail discounts. Agents who produce at least $2 million in annuity premium in a year earn cash and equity-based compensation.expertise. We also have favorable relationships with our national marketing organizations, which have enabled us to efficiently sell through an expanded number of independent agents.
The insuranceindependent agent distribution system is comprised of insurance brokers and marketing organizations. We are pursuing a strategy to increase the efficiency of our independent agent distribution network by strengthening our relationships with key national and regional marketing organizations and are alert for opportunities to establish relationships with organizations not presently associated with us. These organizations typically recruit agents for us by advertising our products and our commission structure through direct mail advertising or seminars for insurance agents and brokers. These organizations bear most of the cost incurred in marketing our products. We compensate marketing organizations by paying them a percentage of the commissions earned on new annuity policy sales generated by the agents recruited by such organizations. We also conduct incentive programs for marketing organizations and agents from time to time, including equity-based programs for our leading national marketers and those agents qualifying for our Gold Eagle program. For additional information regarding our equity-based programs for our leading national marketers and independent agents, see Note 11 to our audited consolidated financial statements.time. We generally do not enter into exclusive arrangements with these marketing organizations.
Agents contracted with us through two national marketing organizations accounted for more than 29% of the annuity deposits and insurance premiums collected during 2016 by American Equity Life, and we expect these organizations to continue as marketers for American Equity Life with a focus on selling our products. The states with the largest share of direct premium collected during 2016 were: Florida (9.6%), California (8.6%), Texas (7.2%), Pennsylvania (6.1%) and North Carolina (5.3%).
Eagle Life's fixed index and fixed rate annuities are distributed pursuant to selling agreements with the applicable broker broker/dealers, banks and registered investment advisors. Relationships with these firms are facilitated by wholesalers who promote Eagle Life and are compensated based upon the sales of the firms that they have contracted with Eagle Life. At December 31, 2014,2016, we had 2653 selling agreements in place with broker broker/dealers. FourFourteen of these selling agreements are with broker broker/dealers affiliated with banks.
Agents contracted with us through two national marketing organizations which market our products accounted for more than 10% of the annuity deposits and insurance premiums collected during 2014, and we expect these organizations to continue as marketers for American Equity Life with a focus onalso is selling our products. The states with the largest share of direct premiums collected during 2014 were: California (9.5%), Florida (8.9%), Texas (6.9%), Illinois (5.6%),through broker/dealers and Pennsylvania (5.6%).we have introduced products specifically for this distribution channel.
Competition and Ratings
We operate in a highly competitive industry. Our annuity products compete with fixed index, fixed rate and variable annuities sold by other insurance companies and also with mutual fund products, traditional bank products and other investment and retirement funding alternatives offered by asset managers, banks, and broker-dealers.broker/dealers. Our insurance products compete with products of other insurance companies, financial intermediaries and other institutions based on a number of features, including crediting rates, index options, policy terms and conditions, service provided to distribution channels and policyholders, ratings, reputation and distributor compensation.

4


The sales agents for our products use the ratings assigned to an insurer by independent rating agencies as one factor in determining which insurer's annuity to market. The degree to which ratings adjustments have affected and will affect our sales and persistency is unknown. Following is a summary of American Equity Life's financial strength ratings:
 Financial Strength Rating Outlook Statement
A.M. Best Company   
January 2011—currentA- Stable
November 2008—January 2011A-Negative
August 2006—October 2008A-Stable
Standard & Poor's   
August 2015—currentA-Stable
June 2013—CurrentAugust 2015BBB+ Positive
October 2011—June 2013BBB+ Stable
September 2010—October 2011BBB+Positive
July 2010—September 2010BBB+Stable
July 2008—July 2010BBB+Negative
Fitch Ratings   
May 2013—CurrentBBB+ Stable
Financial strength ratings generally involve quantitative and qualitative evaluations by rating agencies of a company's financial condition and operating performance. Generally, rating agencies base their ratings upon information furnished to them by the insurer and upon their own investigations, studies and assumptions. Ratings are based upon factors of concern to policyholders, agents and intermediaries and are not directed toward the protection of investors and are not recommendations to buy, sell or hold securities.
In addition to the financial strength ratings, rating agencies use an "outlook statement" to indicate a medium or long-term trend which, if continued, may lead to a rating change. A positive outlook indicates a rating may be raised and a negative outlook indicates a rating may be lowered. A stable outlook is assigned when ratings are not likely to be changed. Outlook statements should not be confused with expected stability of the insurer's financial or economic performance. A rating may have a "stable" outlook to indicate that the rating is not expected to change, but a "stable" outlook does not preclude a rating agency from changing a rating at any time without notice.
In January 2015,December 2016, A.M. Best affirmedchanged its rating outlook on the U.S. life/annuity sector asfrom stable to negative citing increased volatility across economic and regulatory fronts, which has been A.M. Best's outlook on our industry since 2010.includes continuing interest rate pressures. In January 2015,2016, Standard & Poor's affirmed its outlook on the U.S. life insurance sector as stable. The rating agencies have heightened the level of scrutiny they apply to insurance companies, increased the frequency and scope of their credit reviews and may adjust upward the capital and other requirements employed in the rating agency models for maintenance of certain ratings levels.
A.M. Best Company ratings currently range from "A++" (Superior) to "F" (In Liquidation), and include 16 separate ratings categories. Within these categories, "A++" (Superior) and "A+" (Superior) are the highest, followed by "A" (Excellent) and "A-" (Excellent) then followed by "B++" (Good) and "B+" (Good). Publications of A.M. Best Company indicate that the "A-" rating is assigned to those companies that, in A.M. Best Company's opinion, have demonstrated an excellent ability to meet their ongoing obligations to policyholders.
Standard & Poor's insurer financial strength ratings currently range from "AAA (extremely strong)" to "R (under regulatory supervision)", and include 21 separate ratings categories, while "NR" indicates that Standard & Poor's has no opinion about the insurer's financial strength. Within these categories, "AAA" and "AA" are the highest, followed by "A" and "BBB". Publications of Standard & Poor's indicate that an insurer rated "BBB""A-" is regarded as having goodstrong financial security characteristics, but is somewhat more likely to be affected by adverse business conditions than are higher rated insurers.
FitchRating'sFitch Rating's insurer financial strength ratings currently range from "AAA (exceptionally strong)" to "C (distressed)." Ratings of "BBB-" and higher are considered to be "secure," and those of "BB+" and lower are considered to be "vulnerable."
A.M. Best Company, Standard & Poor's and Fitch review their ratings of insurance companies from time to time. There can be no assurance that any particular rating will continue for any given period of time or that it will not be changed or withdrawn entirely if, in their judgment, circumstances so warrant. If our ratings were to be negatively adjusted for any reason, we could experience a material decline in the sales of our products and the persistency of our existing business.business, as well as an increase in the cost of debt or equity financing.

Reinsurance
We follow the industry practice of reinsuring a portion of our annuity risks with unaffiliated reinsurers. Our reinsurance agreements play a part in managing our regulatory capital.
Coinsurance
American Equity Life has two coinsurance agreements with EquiTrust Life Insurance Company ("EquiTrust"), covering 70% of certain of American Equity Life's fixed index and fixed rate annuities issued from August 1, 2001 through December 31, 2001, 40% of those contracts issued during 2002 and 2003, and 20% of those contracts issued from January 1, 2004 to July 31, 2004. The business reinsured under these agreements may not be recaptured. Coinsurance deposits (aggregate policy benefit reserves transferred to EquiTrust under these agreements) were $0.9 billion at December 31, 2014 and 2013. We remain liable to policyholders with respect to the policy liabilities ceded to EquiTrust should EquiTrust fail to meet the obligations it has coinsured. EquiTrust has received a financial strength rating of "B+" (Good) with a stable outlook from A.M. Best Company. None of the coinsurance deposits with EquiTrust are deemed by management to be uncollectible.

5


American Equity Life has three coinsurance agreements with Athene Life Re Ltd. ("Athene"), an unauthorized life reinsurer domiciled in Bermuda. One agreement ceded 20% of certain of American Equity Life's fixed index annuities issued from January 1, 2009 through March 31, 2010. The business reinsured under this agreement is not eligible for recapture until the end of the month following seven years after the date of issuance of the policy. The second agreement cedesceded 80% of American Equity Life's multi-year rate guaranteed annuities issued from July 1, 2009 through December 31, 2013 and 80% of Eagle Life's multi-year rate guaranteed annuities issued from November 20, 2013 through December 31, 2013. The business reinsured under this agreement may not be recaptured. The third agreement cedes 80% of American Equity Life's and Eagle Life's multi-year rate guaranteed annuities issued on or after January 1, 2014, and 80% of Eagle Life's fixed index annuities.annuities issued on or after January 1, 2014 and 80% of certain of American Equity Life's fixed index annuities issued from August 1, 2016 through December 31, 2016. The reinsurance agreement specifies that the coinsurance percentage for Eagle Life's fixed index annuities decreases to 50% for policies issued between January 1, 20162017 and December 31, 2018, and to 20% for policies issued on or after January 1, 2019. The business reinsured under this agreement may not be recaptured. Coinsurance deposits (aggregate policy benefit reserves transferred to Athene under these agreements) were $2.2 billion and $2.1 billion at December 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively. American Equity Life is an intermediary for reinsurance of Eagle Life's business ceded to Athene. American Equity Life and Eagle Life remain liable to policyholders with respect to the policy liabilities ceded to Athene should Athene fail to meet the obligations it has coinsured. The annuity deposits that have been ceded to Athene are held in trusts and American Equity Life is named as the sole beneficiary of the trusts. The assets in the trusts are required to remain at a value that is sufficient to support the current balance of policy benefit liabilities of the ceded business on a statutory basis. If the value of the trust accounts would ever reach a point where it isbe less than the amount of the ceded policy benefit liabilities on a statutory basis, Athene is required to either establish a letter of credit or deposit securities in the trusts for the amount of any shortfall. None of the coinsurance deposits with Athene are deemed by management to be uncollectible.
American Equity Life has two coinsurance agreements with EquiTrust Life Insurance Company ("EquiTrust"), covering 70% of certain of American Equity Life's fixed index and fixed rate annuities issued from August 1, 2001 through December 31, 2001, 40% of those contracts issued during 2002 and 2003, and 20% of those contracts issued from January 1, 2004 to July 31, 2004. The business reinsured under these agreements may not be recaptured. We remain liable to policyholders with respect to the policy liabilities ceded to EquiTrust should EquiTrust fail to meet the obligations it has coinsured. EquiTrust has received a financial strength rating of "B++" (Good) with a stable outlook from A.M. Best Company. None of the coinsurance deposits with EquiTrust are deemed by management to be uncollectible.
Financing Arrangements
American Equity Life has twoa reinsurance transactionsagreement with Hannover Life Reassurance Company of America, ("Hannover"), which areis treated as reinsurance under statutory accounting practices and as a financing arrangementsarrangement under U.S. generally accepted accounting principles ("GAAP"). The statutory surplus benefitsbenefit under these agreements arethis agreement is eliminated under GAAP and the associated charges are recorded as risk charges and included in other operating costs and expenses in the consolidated statements of operations. The transactionsagreement became effective March 31, 2011 (the "2011 Hannover Transaction") and July 1, 2013 (the "2013 Hannover Transaction").
The 2011 Hannover Transaction is a coinsurance and yearly renewable term reinsurance agreement for statutory purposes and provided $49.2 million in net pretax statutory surplus benefit at inception in 2011. The 2011 Hannover Transaction terminates on March 31, 2016, and the statutory surplus benefit is reduced over a five year period and is eliminated upon termination. Pursuant to the terms of this agreement, pretax statutory surplus was reduced by $10.8 million, $11.3 million and $11.8 million in 2014, 2013 and 2012, respectively, and is expected to be reduced as follows: 2015—$10.3 million and 2016—$2.5 million. These amounts include risk charges equal to 1.25% of the pretax statutory surplus benefit as of the end of each calendar quarter.
The 2013 Hannover Transaction is a yearly renewable term reinsurance agreement for statutory purposes covering 45.6% of waived surrender charges related to penalty free withdrawals, deaths and lifetime income benefit rider payments as well as lifetime income benefit rider payments in excess of policy fund values on certain business. We may recapture the risks reinsured under this agreement as of the end of any quarter after June 30, 2016. However,December 31, 2020 and the agreement, as amended, makes it punitive to us if we do not recapture the business ceded no later thanby the first quarter of 2018. The reserve credit recorded on a statutory basis by American Equity Life was $322.5 million and $288.2 million at December 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively. We pay quarterly reinsurance premiums under this agreement with an experience refund calculated on a quarterly basis and a risk charge equal to 1.25% of the pretax statutory surplus benefit as of the end of each calendar quarter. The 2013 Hannover Transaction replaces a similar reinsurance agreement with Hannover that was recaptured simultaneously with entering into the 2013 Hannover Transaction.2021.
Indemnity Reinsurance
Consistent with the general practice of the life insurance industry, American Equity Life enters into agreements of indemnity reinsurance with other insurance companies in order to reinsure portions of the coverage provided by its annuity, life and accident and health insurance products. Indemnity reinsurance agreements are intended to limit a life insurer's maximum loss on a large or unusually hazardous risk or to diversify its risks. Indemnity reinsurance does not discharge the original insurer's primary liability to the insured.
The maximum loss retained by us on any one life insurance policy we have issued was $0.1 million or less as of December 31, 2014.2016. American Equity Life's reinsured business under indemnity reinsurance agreements is primarily ceded to two reinsurers. Reinsurance related to life and accident and health insurance that was ceded by us to these reinsurers was immaterial.
We believe the assuming companies will be able to honor all contractual commitments, based on our periodic review of their financial statements, insurance industry reports and reports filed with state insurance departments.
For more information regarding reinsurance, see Note 7 to our audited consolidated financial statements. For risks involving reinsurance see "Item 1A. Risk Factors - Our reinsurance program involves risks because we remain liable with respect to the liabilities ceded to reinsurers if the reinsurers fail to meet the obligations assumed by them."

Regulation
Life insurance companies are subject to regulation and supervision by the states in which they transact business. State insurance laws establish supervisory agencies with broad regulatory authority, including the power to:
grant and revoke licenses to transact business;
regulate and supervise trade practices and market conduct;
establish guaranty associations;
license agents;
approve policy forms;

6


approve premium rates for some lines of business;
establish reserve requirements;
prescribe the form and content of required financial statements and reports;
determine the reasonableness and adequacy of statutory capital and surplus;
perform financial, market conduct and other examinations;
define acceptable accounting principles for statutory reporting;
regulate the type and amount of permitted investments; and
limit the amount of dividends and surplus note payments that can be paid without obtaining regulatory approval.
Our life subsidiaries are subject to periodic examinations by state regulatory authorities. TheIn 2015, the Iowa Insurance Division is currently conductingcompleted financial examinations of American Equity Life and Eagle Life for the five year period ending December 31, 2013. There were no adjustments to American Equity Life's or Eagle Life's statutory financial statements as a result of these examinations. The New York Insurance Department is currently conducting a financial examination of American Equity Investment Life Insurance Company of New York for the three year period ending December 31, 2013. In 2014, the New York Insurance Department completed an examination of American Equity Investment Life Insurance Company of New York as of December 31, 2010. There were no adjustments to American Equity Investment Life Insurance Company of New York's 2010 statutory financial statements as a result of this examination.
The payment of dividends or the distributions, including surplus note payments, by our life subsidiaries is subject to regulation by each subsidiary's state of domicile's insurance department. Currently, American Equity Life may pay dividends or make other distributions without the prior approval of the Iowa Insurance Commissioner, unless such payments, together with all other such payments within the preceding twelve months, exceed the greater of (1) American Equity Life's statutory net gain from operations for the preceding calendar year, or (2) 10% of American Equity Life's statutory surplus at the preceding December 31. For 2015,2017, up to $343.3$272.7 million can be distributed as dividends by American Equity Life without prior approval of the Iowa Insurance Commissioner. In addition, dividends and surplus note payments may be made only out of earned surplus, and all surplus note payments are subject to prior approval by regulatory authorities. American Equity Life had $1.2$1.4 billion of statutory earned surplus at December 31, 2014.2016.
Most states have also enacted regulations on the activities of insurance holding company systems, including acquisitions, extraordinary dividends, the terms of surplus notes, the terms of affiliate transactions and other related matters. We are registered pursuant to such legislation in Iowa. A number of state legislatures have also considered or have enacted legislative proposals that alter and, in many cases, increase the authority of state agencies to regulate insurance companies and holding company systems.
Most states, including Iowa and New York where our life subsidiaries are domiciled, have enacted legislation or adopted administrative regulations affecting the acquisition of control of insurance companies as well as transactions between insurance companies and persons controlling them. The nature and extent of such legislation and regulations currently in effect vary from state to state. However, most states require administrative approval of the direct or indirect acquisition of 10% or more of the outstanding voting securities of an insurance company incorporated in the state. The acquisition of 10% of such securities is generally deemed to be the acquisition of "control" for the purpose of the holding company statutes and requires not only the filing of detailed information concerning the acquiring parties and the plan of acquisition, but also administrative approval prior to the acquisition. In many states, the insurance authority may find that "control" in fact does not exist in circumstances in which a person owns or controls more than 10% of the voting securities.
Historically, the federal government has not directly regulated the business of insurance. However, federal legislation and administrative policies in several areas, including pension regulation, age and sex discrimination, financial services regulation, securities regulation and federal taxation can significantly affect the insurance business. Additionally, the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010 (the "Dodd-Frank Act") generally provides for enhanced federal supervision of financial institutions, including insurance companies in certain circumstances, and financial activities that represent a systemic risk to financial stability or the U.S. economy. Under the Dodd-Frank Act, a Federal Insurance Office has been established within the U.S. Treasury Department to monitor all aspects of the insurance industry and its authority may extend to our business, although the Federal Insurance Office is not empowered with any general regulatory authority over insurers. The director of the Federal Insurance Office serves in an advisory capacity to the Financial Stability Oversight Council ("FSOC") and has the ability to recommend that an insurance company be subject to heightened prudential standards by the Federal Reserve, if it is determined that financial distress at the company could pose a threat to financial stability in the U.S. The Dodd-Frank Act also provides for the preemption of state laws when inconsistent with certain international agreements.
On April 6, 2016, the U.S. Department of Labor released a final regulation which substantially expands the range of activities that will be considered fiduciary advice under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 and the Internal Revenue Code of 1986. If the regulation is not overturned by pending lawsuits or otherwise delayed, repealed or revised, implementation is scheduled to phase in beginning April 10, 2017. The success of efforts to overturn, delay, repeal or revise the regulation cannot be predicted. We believe it could materially impact our business and have an adverse effect on sales of annuity products to individual retirement account (“IRAs”) holders, particularly index annuity products sold in the independent insurance agent distribution channel. A significant portion of our annuity sales are to IRAs. The new regulation deems advisors, including independent insurance agents, who sell fixed index annuities to IRAs, IRA rollovers or 401(k) plans fiduciaries and

prohibits them from receiving compensation unless they comply with a prohibited transaction exemption. Although the precise impact of the final regulation is difficult to assess, compliance with the prohibited transaction exemptions will likely result in increased regulatory burdens, decreases in sales, changes to our compensation practices and product offerings and increased litigation risk, which could negatively impact our business, results of operations or financial condition.
State insurance regulators and the National Association of Insurance Commissioners ("NAIC") are continually reexamining existing laws and regulations and developing new legislation for passage by state legislatures and new regulations for adoption by insurance authorities. Proposed laws and regulations or those still under development pertain to insurer solvency and market conduct and in recent years have focused on:
insurance company investments;
risk-based capital ("RBC") guidelines, which consist of regulatory targeted surplus levels based on the relationship of statutory capital and surplus, with prescribed adjustments, to the sum of stated percentages of each element of a specified list of company risk exposures;
the implementation of non-statutory guidelines and the circumstances under which dividends may be paid;
principles-based reserving;
own risk solvency and enterprise risk management assessment;
cybersecurity assessments;
product approvals;
agent licensing;
underwriting and suitability practices; and
life insurance and annuity sales practices.

7


The NAIC's RBC requirements are intended to be used by insurance regulators as an early warning tool to identify deteriorating or weakly capitalized insurance companies for the purpose of initiating regulatory action. The RBC formula defines a minimum capital standard which supplements low, fixed minimum capital and surplus requirements previously implemented on a state-by-state basis. Such requirements are not designed as a ranking mechanism for adequately capitalized companies.
The NAIC's RBC requirements provide for four levels of regulatory attention depending on the ratio of a company's total adjusted capital to its RBC. Adjusted capital is defined as the total of statutory capital and surplus, asset valuation reserve and certain other adjustments. Calculations using the NAIC formula at December 31, 2014,2016, indicated that American Equity Life's ratio of total adjusted capital to the highest level at which regulatory action might be initiated was 372%342%.
Our life subsidiaries also may be required, under the solvency or guaranty laws of most states in which they do business, to pay assessments up to certain prescribed limits to fund policyholder losses or liabilities of insolvent insurance companies. These assessments may be deferred or forgiven under most guaranty laws if they would threaten an insurer's financial strength and, in certain instances, may be offset against future premium taxes.
Federal Income Tax
The annuity and life insurance products that we market generally provide the policyholder with a federal income tax advantage, as compared to certain other savings investments such as certificates of deposit and taxable bonds, in that federal income taxation on any increases in the contract values (i.e., the "inside build-up") of these products is deferred until it is received by the policyholder. With other savings investments, the increase in value is generally taxed each year as it is realized. Additionally, life insurance death benefits are generally exempt from income tax.
From time to time, various tax law changes have been proposed that could have an adverse effect on our business, including the elimination of all or a portion of the income tax advantage described above for annuities and life insurance. If legislation were enacted to eliminate the tax deferral for annuities, such a change would have an adverse effect on our ability to sell non-qualified annuities. Non-qualified annuities are annuities that are not sold to an individual retirement account or other qualified retirement plan.
Since 2013, distributions from non-qualified annuity policies are considered "investment income" for purposes of the Medicare tax on investment income contained in the Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act of 2010. As a result, in certain circumstances a 3.8% tax ("Medicare Tax") may be applied to some or the entire taxable portion of distributions from non-qualified annuities to individuals whose income exceeds certain threshold amounts. This tax may have an adverse effect on our ability to sell non-qualified annuities to individuals whose income exceeds these threshold amounts.
Employees
As of December 31, 2014,2016, we had 418530 full-time employees. We have experienced no work stoppages or strikes and consider our relations with our employees to be excellent. None of our employees are represented by a union.
Item 1A.    Risk Factors
We are exposed to significant financial and capital risk, including changing interest rates and credit spreads which may have an adverse effect on sales of our products, profitability, investment portfolio and reported book value per share.
Future changes in interest rates and credit spreads may result in fluctuations in the income derived from our investments. These and other factors could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.

Interest rate and credit spread risk. Our interest rate risk is related to market price and changes in cash flow. Substantial and sustained increases and decreases in market interest rates can materially and adversely affect the profitability of our products, our ability to earn predictable returns, the fair value of our investments and the reported value of stockholders' equity. A rise in interest rates, in the absence of other countervailing changes, will decrease the unrealized gain position of our investment portfolio and may result in an unrealized loss position. With respect to our available for sale fixed maturity securities, such declines in value (net of income taxes and certain adjustments for assumed changes in amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs and deferred sales inducements) reduce our reported stockholders' equity and book value per share.
If interest rates rise dramatically within a short period of time, our business may be exposed to disintermediation risk. Disintermediation risk is the risk that our policyholders may surrender all or part of their contracts in a rising interest rate environment, which may require us to sell assets in an unrealized loss position. Alternatively, we may increase crediting rates to retain business and reduce the level of assets that may need to be sold at a loss. However, such action would reduce our investment spread and net income.
Due to the long-term nature of our annuity liabilities, sustained declines in long-term interest rates may result in increased redemptions of our fixed maturity securities that are subject to call redemption prior to maturity by the issuer or prepayments of commercial mortgage loans and expose us to reinvestment risk. If we are unable to reinvest the proceeds from such redemptions into investments with credit quality and yield characteristics of the redeemed or prepaid investments, our net income and overall financial performance may be adversely affected. We have a certain ability to mitigate this risk by lowering crediting rates on our products subject to certain restrictions as discussed below.

8


Our exposure to credit spreads is related to market price and changes in cash flows related to changes in credit spreads. If credit spreads widen significantly it could result in greater investment income on new investments but would also indicate growing concern about the ability of credit issuers to service their debt which could result in additional other than temporary impairments. If credit spreads tighten significantly it could result in reduced net investment income from new purchases of fixed maturity securities or fundings of commercial mortgage loans.
Credit risk. We are subject to the risk that the issuers of our fixed maturity securities and other debt securities and borrowers on our commercial mortgages, will default on principal and interest payments, particularly if a major downturn in economic activity occurs. An increase in defaults on our fixed maturity securities and commercial mortgage loan portfolios could harm our financial strength and reduce our profitability.
Credit and cash flow assumption risk is the risk that issuers of securities, mortgagees on mortgage loans or other parties, including derivatives counterparties, default on their contractual obligations or experience adverse changes to their contractual cash flow streams. We attempt to minimize the adverse impact of this risk by monitoring portfolio diversification and exposure by asset class, creditor, industry, and by complying with investment limitations governed by state insurance laws and regulations as applicable. We also consider all relevant objective information available in estimating the cash flows related to residential and commercial mortgage backed securities.
We use derivative instruments to fund the annual credits on our fixed index annuities. We purchase derivative instruments, consisting primarily of one-year call options, from a number of counterparties. Our policy is to acquire such options only from counterparties rated "A-"or better by a nationally recognized rating agency and the maximum credit exposure to any single counterparty is subject to concentration limits. In addition, we have entered into credit support agreements with our counterparties which allow us to require our counterparties to post collateral to secure their obligations to us under the derivative instruments. If our counterparties fail to honor their obligations under the derivative instruments, our revenues may not be sufficient to fund the annual index credits on our fixed index annuities. Any such failure could harm our financial strength and reduce our profitability.
Liquidity risk. We could have difficulty selling our private placement securities and commercial mortgage loans because they are less liquid than our publicly traded securities. If we require significant amounts of cash on short notice, we may have difficulty selling these securities and loans at attractive prices or in a timely manner, or both.
Fluctuations in interest rates and investment spread could adversely affect our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.
A key component of our net income is the investment spread. A narrowing of investment spreads may adversely affect operating results. Although we have the right to adjust interest crediting rates (cap, participation or asset fee rates for fixed index annuities) on most products, changes to crediting rates may not be sufficient to maintain targeted investment spreads in all economic and market environments. In general, our ability to lower crediting rates is subject to minimum crediting rates filed with and approved by state regulators. In addition, competition and other factors, including the potential for increases in surrenders and withdrawals, may limit our ability to adjust or maintain crediting rates at levels necessary to avoid the narrowing of spreads under certain market conditions. Our policy structure generally provides for resetting of policy crediting rates at least annually and imposes withdrawal penalties for withdrawals during the first 5 to 17 years a policy is in force.
Managing the investment spread on our fixed index annuities is more complex than it is for fixed rate annuity products. We manage the index-based risk component of our fixed index annuities by purchasing call options on the applicable indices to fund the annual index credits on these annuities and by adjusting the caps, participation rates and asset fees on policy anniversary dates to reflect changes in the cost of such options which varies based on market conditions. The price of such options generally increases with increases in the volatility in both the indices and interest rates, which may either narrow the spread or cause us to lower caps or participation rates. Thus, the volatility of the cost of the indices adds an additional degree of uncertainty to the profitability of the index products. We attempt to mitigate this risk by resetting caps, participation rates and asset fees annually on the policy anniversaries.

Persistent environment of low interest rates affects and may continue to negatively affect our results of operations and financial condition.
Prolonged periods of low interest rates may have a negative impact on our ability to sell our fixed index annuities as consumers look for other financial instruments with potentially higher yields to fund retirement. In times of low interest rates, such as we have been experiencing since 2010 and which we may continue to experience in 2015,2017, it is difficult to offer attractive rates and benefits to customers while maintaining profitability, which may limit sales growth of interest sensitive products.
Sustained declines in interest rates may subject us to lower returns on our invested assets, and we have had to and may have to continue to invest the cash we receive from premiums and interest or return of principal on our investments in instruments with yields less than those we currently own. This may reduce our future net investment income and compress the spread on our annuity products. Further, borrowers may prepay fixed maturity securities and commercial mortgage loans in order to borrow at lower market rates. Any related prepayment fees are recorded in net investment income and may create income statement volatility.
An environment of rising interest rates may materially affect our liquidity and financial condition.
Periods of rising interest rates may cause increased policy surrenders and withdrawals as policyholders seek financial instruments with higher returns, commonly referred to as disintermediation. This may lead to net cash outflows and the resulting liquidity demands may require us to sell investment assets when the prices of those assets are adversely affected by the increase in interest rates, which may result in realized investment losses. Further, a portion of our investment portfolio consists of commercial mortgage loans and privately placed securities, which are relatively illiquid, thus increasing our liquidity risk in the event of disintermediation. We may also be required to accelerate the amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs and deferred sales inducements related to surrendered contracts, which would adversely affect our results of operations.

9


During such times, we may offer higher crediting rates on new sales of annuity products and increase crediting rates on existing annuity products to maintain or enhance product competitiveness. We may not be able to purchase enough higher yielding assets necessary to fund higher crediting rates and maintain our desired spread, which could result in lower profitability on our business. Alternatively, if we seek to maintain profitability of our products in rising interest rate environments it may be difficult to position our products to offer attractive rates and benefits to customers which may limit sales growth of interest sensitive products.
Our valuation of fixed maturity and equity securities may include methodologies, estimates and assumptions which are subject to differing interpretations and could result in changes to investment valuations that may materially adversely affect our results of operations or financial condition.
Fixed maturity securities and equity securities are reported at fair value in our consolidated balance sheets. During periods of market disruption including periods of significantly rising or high interest rates, rapidly widening credit spreads or illiquidity, it may be difficult to value certain of our securities if trading becomes less frequent and/or market data becomes less observable. Prices provided by independent broker quotes or independent pricing services that are used in the determination of fair value can vary significantly for a particular security. There may be certain asset classes that were in active markets with significant observable data that become illiquid due to the current financial environment. As such, valuations may include inputs and assumptions that are less observable or require greater judgment as well as valuation methods that require greater judgment. Further, rapidly changing and unprecedented credit and equity market conditions could materially impact the valuation of securities as reported in our consolidated financial statements and the period-to-period changes in value could vary significantly. Decreases in value may have a material adverse effect on our results of operations or financial condition.
Defaults on commercial mortgage loans and volatility in performance may adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Commercial mortgage loans have facedthe potential to face heightened delinquency and default risk since 2010 due todepending on economic conditions which could have had a negative impact on the performance of the underlying collateral, resulting in declining values and an adverse impact on the obligors of such instruments. An increase in the default rate of our commercial mortgage loan investments could have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
In addition, the carrying value of commercial mortgage loans is negatively impacted by such factors. The carrying value of commercial mortgage loans is stated atas outstanding principal less any loan loss allowances recognized. Considerations in determining allowances include, but are not limited to, the following: (i) declining debt service coverage ratios and increasing loan to value ratios; (ii) bankruptcy filings of major tenants or affiliates of the borrower on the property; (iii) catastrophic events at the property; and (iv) other subjective events or factors, including whether the terms of the debt will be restructured. There can be no assurance that management's assessment of loan loss allowances on commercial mortgage loans will not change in future periods, which could lead to investment losses.
Conditions in the U.S. and global capital markets and economies could deteriorate in the near future and affect our financial position and our level of earnings from our operations.
The U.S. government has continued to keep interest rates low and has increased the supply of United States dollars as strategiesa strategy to stimulate the economy. While these strategies have appeared to be successful, any future economic downturn or market disruption could negatively impact our ability to invest funds. Specifically, if market conditions deteriorate in 20152017 or beyond:

our investment portfolio could incur additional other than temporary impairments;
our commercial mortgage loans could experience a greater amount of loss;
due to potential downgrades in our investment portfolio, we could be required to raise additional capital to sustain our current business in force and new sales of our annuity products, which may be difficult in a distressed market. If capital would be available, it may be at terms that are not favorable to us;
we may be required to limit growth in sales of our annuity products; and/or
our liquidity could be negatively affected and we could be forced to limit our operations and our business could suffer, as we need liquidity to pay our policyholder benefits, operating expenses, dividends on our capital stock, and to service our debt obligations.
The principal sources of our liquidity are annuity deposits, investment income and proceeds from the sale, maturity and call of investments. Sources of additional capital in normal markets include the issuance by us of a variety of short and long-term instruments, including equity, debt or other types of securities.
Governmental initiatives intended to improve global and local economies may be accompanied by other initiatives, including new capital requirements or other regulations, that could materially affect our business, results of operations, financial condition and liquidity in ways that we cannot predict.
We are subject to extensive laws and regulations that are administered and enforced by a number of different regulatory authorities including state insurance regulators, the NAIC, the SEC and the New York Stock Exchange. Some of these authorities are or may in the future consider enhanced or new regulatory requirements intended to prevent future economic crises or otherwise assure the stability of institutions under their supervision. These authorities may also seek to exercise their supervisory or enforcement authority in new or more robust ways. All of these possibilities, if they occurred, could affect the way we conduct our business and manage our capital, and may require us to satisfy increased capital requirements, any of which in turn could materially affect our results of operations, financial condition and liquidity.

10


We face competition from companies that have greater financial resources, broader arrays of products and higher ratings, which may impair our ability to retain existing customers, attract new customers and maintain our profitability and financial strength.
We operate in a highly competitive industry. Many of our competitors are substantially larger and enjoy substantially greater financial resources, higher ratings by rating agencies, broader and more diversified product lines and more widespread agency relationships. Our annuity products compete with fixed index, fixed rate and variable annuities sold by other insurance companies and also with mutual fund products, traditional bank products and other retirement funding alternatives offered by asset managers, banks and broker-dealers.broker/dealers. Our insurance products compete with those of other insurance companies, financial intermediaries and other institutions based on a number of factors, including premium rates, policy terms and conditions, service provided to distribution channels and policyholders, ratings by rating agencies, reputation and distributor compensation.
While we compete with numerous other companies, we view the following as our most significant competitors:
Allianz Life Insurance Company of North America;
Security Benefit Life;
Great American Life Insurance Company;
AIG Companies;
Athene USA Corp; and
Midland National Life Insurance Company.
Our ability to compete depends in part on returns and other benefits we make available to our policyholders through our annuity contracts. We will not be able to accumulate and retain assets under management for our products if our investment results underperform the market or the competition, since such underperformance likely would result in lower rates to policyholders which could lead to withdrawals and reduced sales.
We compete for distribution sources for our products. We believe that our success in competing for distributors depends on our financial strength, the services we provide to and the relationships we develop with these distributors, as well as offering competitive commission structures. Our distributors are generally free to sell products from whichever providers they wish, which makes it important for us to continually offer distributors products and services they find attractive. If our products or services fall short of distributors' needs, we may not be able to establish and maintain satisfactory relationships with distributors of our annuity and life insurance products. Our ability to compete in the past has also depended in part on our ability to develop innovative new products and bring them to market more quickly than our competitors. In order for us to compete in the future, we will need to continue to bring innovative products to market in a timely fashion. Otherwise, our revenues and profitability could suffer.
Our reinsurance program involves risks because we remain liable with respect to the liabilities ceded to reinsurers if the reinsurers fail to meet the obligations assumed by them.
Our life insurance subsidiaries cede certain policies to other insurance companies through reinsurance agreements. American Equity Life has three coinsurance agreements with Athene covering $3.9 billion of policy benefit reserves at December 31, 2016 and American Equity Life has entered into two coinsurance agreements with EquiTrust covering $0.9$0.7 billion of policy benefit reserves at December 31, 2014 and American Equity Life has three coinsurance agreements with Athene covering $2.2 billion of policy benefit reserves at December 31, 2014.2016. Since Athene is an unauthorized reinsurer, the annuity deposits that have been ceded to Athene are held in trusts and American Equity Life is named as the sole beneficiary of the trusts. The assets in the trusts are required to remain at a value that is sufficient to support the current balance of policy benefit liabilities of the ceded business on a statutory basis. If the value of the assets in the trusts would ever reach a point where it isbe less than the amount of the ceded policy benefit liabilities on a statutory basis, Athene is required to either establish a letter of credit or deposit securities in the trusts for the amount of any shortfall. We remain liable with respect to the policy liabilities ceded to EquiTrust and Athene should either fail to meet the obligations assumed by them.
In addition, we have entered into other types of reinsurance contracts including indemnity reinsurance and financing arrangements. Should any of these reinsurers fail to meet the obligations assumed under such contracts, we remain liable with respect to the liabilities ceded.
Any disruption in our ability to maintain our reinsurance program may hinder our ability to manage our regulatory capital.
No assurances can be made that reinsurance will remain continuously available to us to the same extent and on the same terms as are currently available. If we were unable to maintain our current level of reinsurance or purchase new reinsurance protection in amounts that we consider sufficient and at prices that we consider acceptable, we would have to accept an increase in our net liability exposure or a decrease in our statutory surplus, reduce the amount of business we write or develop other alternatives to reinsurance.

11


We may experience volatility in net income due to the application of fair value accounting to our derivative instruments.
All of our derivative instruments, including certain derivative instruments embedded in other contracts, are recognized in the balance sheet at their fair values and changes in fair value are recognized immediately in earnings. This impacts certain revenues and expenses we report for our fixed index annuity business as follows:
We must present the call options purchased to fund the annual index credits on our fixed index annuity products at fair value. The fair value of the call options is based upon the amount of cash that would be required to settle the call options obtained from the counterparties adjusted for the nonperformance risk of the counterparty. We record the change in fair value of these options as a component of our revenues. The change in fair value of derivatives includes the gains or losses recognized at expiration of the option term or upon early termination and changes in fair value for open positions.
The contractual obligations for future annual index credits are treated as a "series of embedded derivatives" over the expected life of the applicable contracts. Increases or decreases in the fair value of embedded derivatives generally correspond to increases or decreases in equity market performance and changes in the interest rates used to discount the excess of the projected policy contract values over the projected minimum guaranteed contract values. We record the change in fair value of these embedded derivatives as a component of our benefits and expenses in our consolidated statements of operations.
The application of fair value accounting for derivatives and embedded derivatives in future periods to our fixed index annuity business may cause substantial volatility in our reported net income.
Our results of operations and financial condition depend on the accuracy of management assumptions and estimates.
Assumptions and estimates are made regarding expenses and interest rates, tax liability, contingent liabilities, investment performance and other factors related to our business and anticipated results. We rely on these assumptions and estimates when determining period end accruals, future earnings and various components of our consolidated balance sheet. All assumptions and estimates utilized incorporate many factors, none of which can be predicted with certainty. Our actual experiences, as well as changes in estimates, are used to prepare our consolidated statement of operations. To the extent our actual experience and changes in estimates differ from original estimates, our results of operations and financial condition could be materially adversely affected.
The calculations we use to estimate various components of our consolidated balance sheet and consolidated statement of operations are necessarily complex and involve analyzing and interpreting large quantities of data. The assumptions and estimates required for these calculations involve judgment and by their nature are imprecise and subject to changes and revisions over time. Accordingly, our results may be adversely affected from time to time by actual results differing from assumptions, by changes in estimates and by changes resulting from implementing more sophisticated administrative systems and procedures that facilitate the calculation of more precise estimates.
We may face unanticipated losses if there are significant deviations from our assumptions regarding the probabilities that our annuity contracts will remain in force from one period to the next.next and our assumptions regarding policyholders' utilization of lifetime income benefit riders.
The expected future profitability of our annuity products is based in part upon expected patterns of premiums, expenses and benefits using a number of assumptions, including those related to the probability that a policy or contract will remain in force, or persistency, and mortality. Since no insurer can precisely determine persistency or mortality, actual results could differ significantly from assumptions, and deviations from estimates and assumptions could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations. For example, actual persistency that is lower than our assumptions could have an adverse impact on future profitability, especially in the early years of a policy or contract primarily because we would be required to accelerate the amortization of expenses we deferred in connection with the acquisition of the policy.
In addition, we set initial crediting rates for our annuity products based upon expected claims and payment patterns, using assumptions for, among other factors, mortality rates of our policyholders. The long-term profitability of these products depends upon how our actual experience compares with our pricing assumptions. For example, if mortality rates are lower than our pricing assumptions, we could be required to make more payments under certain annuity contracts in addition to what we had projected.
In determining the liability from period to period of our lifetime income benefit riders, we must make significant assumptions such as expected index credits, the age when a policyholder may begin to utilize the rider and the number of policyholders that may not utilize the rider at all. Changes in these assumptions can be material. Our experience regarding policyholder activity is limited as we began issuing policies with this rider in 2007. Accordingly, our results of operations could be adversely affected from time to time by actual index credits being different than expected, actual policyholder behavior varying from what we have assumed in determining the liability associated with these riders and by changes in estimates based on this policyholder behavior.

If our estimated gross profits decrease significantly from initial expectations we may be required to expense our deferred policy acquisition costs and deferred sales inducements in an accelerated manner, which would reduce our profitability.
Deferred policy acquisition costs are costs that vary with and primarily relate to the acquisition of new business. Deferred sales inducements are contract enhancements such as first-year premium and interest bonuses that are credited to policyholder account balances. These costs are capitalized when incurred and are amortized over the life of the contracts. Current amortization of these costs is generally in proportion to expected gross profits from interest margins and, to a lesser extent, from surrender charges and rider fees. Unfavorable experience with regard to expected expenses, investment returns, mortality or withdrawals may cause acceleration of the amortization of these costs resulting in an increase of expenses and lower profitability.

12


If we do not manage our growth effectively, our financial performance could be adversely affected; our historical growth rates may not be indicative of our future growth.
We have experienced rapid growth since our formation in December 1995. We intend to continue to grow and further growth will impose significant added responsibilities on our management, including the need to identify, recruit, maintain and integrate additional employees, including management. There can be no assurance that we will be successful in expanding our business or that our systems, procedures and controls will be adequate to support our operations as they expand. In addition, due to our rapid growth and resulting increased size, it may be necessary to expand the scope of our investing activities to asset classes in which we historically have not invested or have not had significant exposure. If we are unable to adequately manage our investments in these classes, our financial condition or operating results in the future could be less favorable than in the past. Further, we have utilized reinsurance in the past to support our growth. The future availability and cost of reinsurance is uncertain. Our failure to manage growth effectively, or our inability to recruit, maintain and integrate additional qualified employees and independent agents, could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations. In addition, our historical growth rates are not likely to accurately reflect our future growth rates or our growth potential. We cannot assure you that our future revenues will increase or that we will continue to be profitable.
The loss of key employees could disrupt our operations.
Our success depends in part on the continued service of key executives and our ability to attract and retain additional executives and employees. We do not have employment agreements with our executive officers. The loss of key employees, or our inability to recruit and retain additional qualified personnel, could cause disruption in our business and prevent us from fully implementing our business strategies, which could materially and adversely affect our business, growth and profitability.
Our operations support complex transactions and are highly dependent on the proper functioning of information technology and communication systems. Any failure of our information technology or communications systems may result in a materially adverse effect on our results of operations and corporate reputation.
While systems and processes are designed to support complex transactions and avoid systems failure, fraud, information security failures, processing errors and breaches of regulation, any failure could lead to a materially adverse effect on our results of operations and corporate reputation. In addition, we must commit significant resources to maintain and enhance our existing systems in order to keep pace with industry standards and customer preferences. If we fail to keep up-to-date information systems, we may not be able to rely on information for product pricing, risk management and underwriting decisions. In addition, even though backup and recovery systems and contingency plans are in place, we cannot assure investors that interruptions, failures or breaches in security of these processes and systems will not occur, or if they do occur, that they can be adequately addressed.remediated promptly. The occurrence of any of these events could have a materially adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.
An information technology failure or security breach may disrupt our business, damage our reputation and adversely affect our results of operations, financial condition and cash flows.
We use information technology ("IT") to store, retrieve, evaluate and utilize customer and company data and information. Our business is highly dependent on our ability to access IT systems to perform necessary business functions such as providing customer support, making changes to existing policies, filing and paying claims, managing our investment portfolios and producing financial statements. While we have policies, procedures, automation and backup plans, and a broad range of information security technical controls designed to prevent or limit the effect of failure, our IT may be vulnerable to disruptions or breaches as a result of natural disasters, man-made disasters, criminal activity, pandemics or other events beyond our control. The failure of our IT for any reason could disrupt our operations, result in the loss of customers and may adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.
We retain confidential information within our IT, and we rely on sophisticated commercial technologies to maintain the security of those systems. Anyone who is able to circumvent our security measures and penetrate our IT could access, view, misappropriate, alter, or delete any information in the systems, including personally identifiable policyholder information and proprietary business information. In addition, an increasing number of states require that persons be notified if a security breach results in the disclosure of personally identifiable customer information. Any compromise of the security of our computer systems that results in inappropriate disclosure of personally identifiable customer information could damage our reputation in the marketplace, deter people from purchasing our products, subject us to significant civil and criminal liability and require us to incur significant technical, legal and other expenses. While there have been attempts to penetrate our IT defenses, there is evidence that the attacks have been blocked and there is no evidence that an IT breach has occurred.

If we are unable to attract and retain national marketing organizations, and independent agents, or develop new distribution channels such as broker/dealers, banks and registered investment advisors, sales of our products may be reduced.
We primarily distribute our annuity products through a variable cost distribution network which includes approximately 38 national marketing organizations and over 30,000 independent agents. We must attract and retain such marketersmarketing organizations and distributors, including agents to sell our products. Insurance companies compete vigorously for productive agents. We compete with other life insurance companies for marketers and agents primarily on the basis of our financial position, support services, compensation and product features. Such marketers and agents may promote products offered by other life insurance companies that may offer a larger variety of products than we do. Our competitiveness for such marketers and agents also depends upon the long-term relationships we develop with them. We have started to developare developing a network of broker/dealers, banks and registered investment advisors to distribute our products. If we are unable to attract and retain sufficient marketers, agents, broker/dealers, banks and registered investment advisors to sell our products, our ability to compete and our sales would suffer.

13


We may require additional capital to support our business and sustain future growth which may not be available when needed or may be available only on unfavorable terms.
Our long-term strategic capital requirements will depend on many factors including the accumulated statutory earnings of our life insurance subsidiaries and the relationship between the statutory capital and surplus of our life insurance subsidiaries and various elements of required capital. For the purpose of supporting long-term capital requirements, we may need to increase or maintain the statutory capital and surplus of our life insurance subsidiaries through additional financings, which could include debt, equity, financing arrangements and/or other surplus relief transactions. Adverse market conditions have affected and continue to affect the availability and cost of capital. Such financings, if available at all, may be available only on terms that are not favorable to us. If we cannot maintain adequate capital, we may be required to limit growth in sales of new annuity products, and such action could adversely affect our business, financial condition or results of operations.
Changes in state and federal regulation may affect our profitability.
We are subject to regulation under applicable insurance statutes, including insurance holding company statutes, in the various states in which our life insurance subsidiaries transact business. Our life insurance subsidiaries are domiciled in Iowa and New York. We are currently licensed to sell our products in 50 states and the District of Columbia. Insurance regulation is intended to provide safeguards for policyholders rather than to protect shareholders of insurance companies or their holding companies. As increased scrutiny has been placed upon the insurance regulatory framework, a number of state legislatures have considered or enacted legislative proposals that alter, and in many cases increase, state authority to regulate insurance companies and holding company systems.
Regulators oversee matters relating to trade practices, policy forms, claims practices, guaranty funds, types and amounts of investments, reserve adequacy, insurer solvency, minimum amounts of capital and surplus, transactions with related parties, changes in control and payment of dividends.
The NAIC and state insurance regulators continually reexamine existing laws and regulations. The NAIC may develop and recommend adoption of new or modify existing Model Laws and Regulations. State insurance regulators may impose those recommended changes, or others, in the future.
Our life insurance subsidiaries are subject to state insurance regulations based on the NAIC's risk-based capital requirements which are intended to be used by insurance regulators as an early warning tool to identify deteriorating or weakly capitalized insurance companies for the purpose of initiating regulatory action. Our life insurance subsidiaries also may be required, under solvency or guaranty laws of most states in which they do business, to pay assessments up to certain prescribed limits to fund policyholder losses or liabilities for insolvent insurance companies.
Although the federal government does not directly regulate the insurance business, federal legislation and administrative policies in several areas, including pension regulation, age and sex discrimination, financial services regulation, securities regulation and federal taxation, can significantly affect the insurance business. In addition, legislation has been enacted which could result in the federal government assuming some role in the regulation of the insurance industry.
In July 2010, the Dodd-Frank Act was enacted and signed into law. The Dodd-Frank Act made extensive changes to the laws regulating the financial services industry and requires various federal agencies to adopt a broad range of new rules and regulations. Among other things, the Dodd-Frank Act imposes a comprehensive new regulatory regime on the over-the-counter ("OTC") derivatives marketplace. This legislation subjects swap dealers and "major swap participants" (as defined in the legislation and further clarified by the rulemaking) to substantial supervision and regulation, including capital standards, margin requirements, business conduct standards, recordkeeping and reporting requirements. It also requires central clearing for certain derivatives transactions that the U.S. Commodities Futures Trading Commission ("CFTC") determines must be cleared and are accepted for clearing by a "derivatives clearing organization" (subject to certain exceptions) and provides the CFTC with authority to impose position limits across markets. Many of the key concepts, definitions, processes and issues surrounding regulation of the OTC derivatives have been left to the relevant regulators to address and many of these regulations have yet to be proposed. The Dodd-Frank Act and any such regulations may subject us to additional restrictions on our hedging positions which may have an adverse effect on our ability to hedge risks associated with our business, including our fixed index annuity business, or on the cost of our hedging activity.
The Dodd-Frank Act also created FSOC.Financial Stability Oversight Council ("FSOC"). The FSOC may designate by a 2/3 vote whether certain insurance companies and insurance holding companies pose a grave threat to the financial stability of the United States, in which case such companies would become subject to prudential regulation by the Board of Governors of the U.S. Federal Reserve (the "Federal Reserve Board") (including capital requirements, leverage limits, liquidity requirements and examinations). The Federal Reserve Board may limit such company's ability to enter into merger transactions, restrict its ability to offer financial products, require it to terminate one or more activities, or impose conditions on the manner in which it conducts activities.
Reserve. The Dodd-Frank Act also established a Federal Insurance Office under the U.S. Treasury Department to monitor all aspects of the insurance industry and of lines of business other than certain health insurance, certain long-term care insurance and crop insurance. The director of the Federal Insurance Office is a non-voting member of FSOC and can provide guidance regarding insurance company designations as systemically important. The Dodd-Frank Act also provides for the pre-emption of state laws in certain instances involving the regulation of reinsurance and other limited insurance matters. The Dodd-Frank Act requires extensive rule-making and other future regulatory action, which in some cases will take a period of years to implement. It is not possible at this time to assess the impact on our business of the establishment of the Federal Insurance Office and the FSOC. However, the regulatory framework at the state and federal level applicable to our insurance products is evolving. The changing regulatory framework could affect the design of such products and our ability to sell certain products. Any changes in these laws and regulations could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition or results of operations.

14


We cannot predictLabor released a final regulation which substantially expands the requirementsrange of any regulations ultimately adoptedactivities that will be considered to be fiduciary advice under the Dodd-FrankEmployee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 and the effect that such regulationsInternal Revenue Code of 1986.  If the regulation is not overturned by pending lawsuits or otherwise delayed, repealed or revised, implementation will have on financial marketsphase in beginning April 10, 2017. The success of efforts to overturn, delay, repeal or onrevise the regulation cannot be predicted. We believe it could materially impact our business and have an adverse effect on sales of annuity products to individual retirement account (“IRA”) holders, particularly index annuity products sold in the additional costs associatedindependent insurance agent distribution channel.  A significant portion of our annuity sales are to IRAs.  The new regulation deems advisors, including independent insurance agents, who sell fixed index annuities to IRAs, IRA rollovers or 401(k) plans fiduciaries and prohibits them from receiving compensation unless they comply with a prohibited transaction exemption. Although the precise impact of the final regulation is difficult to assess, compliance with such regulations, or anythe prohibited transaction exemptions will likely result in increased regulatory burdens, decreases in sales, changes to our operations that may be necessary to comply with the Dodd-Frank Act, any ofcompensation practices and product offerings and increased litigation risk, which could have a material adverse affect onnegatively impact our business, results of operations cash flows or financial condition.
The regulatory framework at the state and federal level applicable to our insurance products is evolving. The changing regulatory framework could affect the design of such products and our ability or the ability of our agents to sell certain products. Any changes in these laws and regulations could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition or results of operations.
Changes in federal income taxation laws, including any reduction in individual income tax rates, may affect sales of our products and profitability.
The annuity and life insurance products that we market generally provide the policyholder with certain federal income tax advantages. For example, federal income taxation on any increases in non-qualified annuity contract values (i.e., the "inside build-up") is deferred until it is received by the policyholder. With other savings instruments, such as certificates of deposit and taxable bonds, the increase in value is generally taxed each year as it is realized. Additionally, life insurance death benefits are generally exempt from income tax. Decreases in individual income tax rates would decrease the advantage of deferring the inside build-up.
From time to time, various tax law changes have been proposed that could have an adverse effect on our business, including the elimination of all or a portion of the income tax advantages described above for annuities and life insurance. If legislation were enacted to eliminate all or a portion of the tax deferral for annuities, such a change would have an adverse effect on our ability to sell non-qualified annuities. Non-qualified annuities are annuities that are not sold to a qualified retirement plan.
Beginning in 2013, distributions from non-qualified annuity policies are now considered "investment income" for purposes of the Medicare tax on investment income contained in the Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act of 2010. As a result, in certain circumstances a 3.8% tax (“Medicare Tax”) may be applied to some or all of the taxable portion of distributions from non-qualified annuities to individuals whose income exceeds certain threshold amounts. This tax may have an adverse effect on our ability to sell non-qualified annuities to individuals whose income exceeds these threshold amounts.
We face risks relating to litigation and regulatory examination, including the costs of such litigation or examination, management distraction and the potential for damage awards, fines, penalties or other required remediation, which may adversely impact our business.
We are occasionally involved in litigation, both as a defendant and as a plaintiff. In addition, state regulatory bodies, such as state insurance departments, the SEC, the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, Inc. ("FINRA"), the Department of Labor and other regulatory bodies regularly make inquiries and conduct examinations or investigations concerning our compliance with, among other things, insurance laws, securities laws, the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended, and laws governing the activities of broker-dealers.broker/dealers. Companies in the life insurance and annuity business have faced litigation, including class action lawsuits, alleging improper product design, improper sales practices and similar claims. We entered into a settlement with respect to a purported class action lawsuit involving allegations that generally attack the suitability of sales of deferred annuity products to persons over the age of 65. While settlement has been approved by the district court and the case dismissed, such ruling remains subject to appeal. The settlement is contingent upon final court approval and appeal. See Note 13 to our audited consolidated financial statements.
A downgrade in our credit or financial strength ratings may increase our future cost of capital, reduce new sales, adversely affect relationships with distributors and increase policy surrenders and withdrawals.
Currently, our senior unsecured indebtedness carries, a "BB+"BBB-" rating with a positivestable outlook from Standard & Poor's, a BB+BBB- rating with a stable outlook from Fitch Ratings, and a "bbb-" rating with a stable outlook from A.M. Best Company. Our ability to maintain such ratings is dependent upon the results of operations of our subsidiaries and our financial strength. If we fail to preserve the strength of our balance sheet and to maintain a capital structure that rating agencies deem suitable, it could result in a downgrade of the ratings applicable to our senior unsecured indebtedness. A downgrade would likely reduce the fair value of the common stock and may increase our future cost of capital.
Financial strength ratings are important factors in establishing the competitive position of life insurance and annuity companies. In recent years, the market for annuities has been dominated by those insurers with the highest ratings. A ratings downgrade, or the potential for a ratings downgrade, could have a number of adverse effects on our business. For example, distributors and sales agents for life insurance and annuity products use the ratings as one factor in determining which insurer's annuities to market. A ratings downgrade could cause those distributors and agents to seek alternative carriers. In addition, a ratings downgrade could materially increase the number of policy or contract surrenders we experience, as well as our ability to obtain reinsurance or obtain reasonable pricing on reinsurance.
Financial strength ratings are measures of an insurance company's ability to meet contractholder and policyholder obligations and generally involve quantitative and qualitative evaluations by rating agencies of a company's financial condition and operating performance. Generally, rating agencies base their ratings upon information furnished to them by the insurer and upon their own investigations, studies and assumptions. Ratings are based upon factors of concern to agents, policyholders and intermediaries and are not directed toward the protection of investors and are not recommendations to buy, sell or hold securities.


15


Item 1B.    Unresolved Staff Comments
None.

Item 2.    Properties
We lease commercial office space in one buildingtwo buildings in West Des Moines, Iowa, one for our principal offices under an operating lease that expires on November 30, 2026.2026 and one for our investment operations under a lease that expires on March 31, 2023. We also lease our office in Pell City, Alabama, pursuant to an operating lease that expires on December 31, 2015.2017. We are fully utilizing these facilities and believe boththese locations to be sufficient to house our operations for the foreseeable future.
Item 3.    Legal Proceedings
See Note 13 to our audited consolidated financial statements.
Item 4.    Mine Safety Disclosures
None
PART II

Item 5.    Market for Registrant's Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
Our common stock is traded on the New York Stock Exchange ("NYSE") under the symbol AEL. The following table sets forth the high and low sales prices of our common stock for each quarterly period within the two most recent fiscal years as quoted on the NYSE.
High LowHigh Low
2014   
2016   
First Quarter$26.42 $18.84$23.65 $12.65
Second Quarter$25.15 $20.97$16.96 $12.77
Third Quarter$25.25 $21.69$18.32 $13.07
Fourth Quarter$29.75 $21.36$23.41 $15.39
2013 
2015 
First Quarter$15.03 $12.33$29.62 $25.46
Second Quarter$16.60 $14.03$29.90 $25.06
Third Quarter$21.42 $15.64$30.02 $22.36
Fourth Quarter$26.46 $20.01$28.30 $22.55
As of February 18, 2015,December 31, 2016, there were approximately 15,90014,100 holders of our common stock. In 2016 and 2014 and 20132015, we paid an annual cash dividend of $0.20$0.24 and $0.18,$0.22, respectively, per share on our common stock. We intend to continue to pay an annual cash dividend on such shares so long as we have sufficient capital and/or future earnings to do so. However, we anticipate retaining most of our future earnings, if any, for use in our operations and the expansion of our business. Any further determination as to dividend policy will be made by our board of directors and will depend on a number of factors, including our future earnings, capital requirements, financial condition and future prospects and such other factors as our board of directors may deem relevant.
Since we are a holding company, our ability to pay cash dividends depends in large measure on our subsidiaries' ability to make distributions of cash or property to us. Iowa insurance laws restrict the amount of distributions American Equity Life and Eagle Life can pay to us without the approval of the Iowa Insurance Commissioner. See Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations and Note 12 to our audited consolidated financial statements, which are incorporated by reference in this Item 5.
Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
There were no issuer purchases of equity securities for the quarter ended December 31, 2014.2016.
On August 27, 2014, we announced a share repurchase program under which we are authorized to purchase up to 500,000 shares of our common stock. As of December 31, 2014, we have repurchased no shares of our common stock under this program. The maximum number of shares that may yet be purchased under this program is 500,000 at December 31, 2014, and the repurchase program expires on August 26, 2015.

16


Item 6.    Selected Consolidated Financial Data
The summary consolidated financial and other data should be read in conjunction with Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations and our audited consolidated financial statements and related notes appearing elsewhere in this report. The results for past periods are not necessarily indicative of results that may be expected for future periods.
Year ended December 31,Year ended December 31,
2014 2013 2012 2011 20102016 2015 2014 2013 2012
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
Consolidated Statements of Operations Data:                  
Revenues                  
Premiums and other considerations$32,623
 $45,347
 $76,675
 $118,912
 $75,558
$43,767
 $36,048
 $32,623
 $45,347
 $76,675
Annuity product charges118,990
 103,591
 89,006
 76,189
 69,075
173,579
 136,168
 118,990
 103,591
 89,006
Net investment income1,531,667
 1,383,927
 1,286,923
 1,218,780
 1,036,106
1,849,872
 1,692,192
 1,531,667
 1,383,927
 1,286,923
Change in fair value of derivatives504,825
 1,076,015
 221,138
 (114,728) 168,862
164,219
 (336,146) 504,825
 1,076,015
 221,138
Net realized gains (losses) on investments, excluding other than temporary impairment ("OTTI") losses(4,003) 40,561
 (6,454) (18,641) 23,726
11,524
 10,211
 (4,003) 40,561
 (6,454)
Net OTTI losses recognized in operations(2,627) (6,234) (14,932) (33,976) (23,867)(22,679) (19,536) (2,627) (6,234) (14,932)
Total revenues2,168,973
 2,610,692
 1,652,356
 1,246,536
 1,349,168
2,220,282
 1,518,937
 2,168,973
 2,610,692
 1,652,356
Benefits and expenses                  
Insurance policy benefits and change in future policy
benefits
41,815
 53,071
 81,481
 115,291
 70,115
52,483
 45,458
 41,815
 53,071
 81,481
Interest sensitive and index product benefits1,473,700
 1,272,867
 808,479
 775,097
 734,930
725,472
 968,053
 1,473,700
 1,272,867
 808,479
Change in fair value of embedded derivatives32,321
 133,968
 286,899
 (105,194) 130,950
543,465
 (464,698) 32,321
 133,968
 286,899
Amortization of deferred sales inducements and policy acquisition costs294,997
 618,581
 252,076
 215,259
 196,261
625,178
 495,504
 294,997
 618,581
 252,076
Interest expense on notes payable and subordinated debentures48,492
 50,958
 41,937
 45,610
 37,031
Interest expense on notes and loan payable and subordinated debentures41,206
 41,088
 48,492
 50,958
 41,937
Other operating costs and expenses81,584
 91,915
 95,495
 67,559
 114,615
102,231
 96,218
 81,584
 91,915
 95,495
Total benefits and expenses1,972,909
 2,221,360
 1,566,367
 1,113,622
 1,283,902
2,090,035
 1,181,623
 1,972,909
 2,221,360
 1,566,367
Income before income taxes196,064
 389,332
 85,989
 132,914
 65,266
130,247
 337,314
 196,064
 389,332
 85,989
Income tax expense70,041
 136,049
 28,191
 46,666
 22,333
47,004
 117,484
 70,041
 136,049
 28,191
Net income$126,023
 $253,283
 $57,798
 $86,248
 $42,933
$83,243
 $219,830
 $126,023
 $253,283
 $57,798
                  
Per Share Data:                  
Earnings per common share$1.69
 $3.86
 $0.94
 $1.45
 $0.73
$0.98
 $2.78
 $1.69
 $3.86
 $0.94
Earnings per common share—assuming dilution1.58
 3.38
 0.89
 1.37
 0.68
0.97
 2.72
 1.58
 3.38
 0.89
Dividends declared per common share0.20
 0.18
 0.15
 0.12
 0.10
0.24
 0.22
 0.20
 0.18
 0.15
                  
Non-GAAP Financial Measures (a):                  
Reconciliation of net income to operating income:                  
Net income$126,023
 $253,283
 $57,798
 $86,248
 $42,933
$83,243
 $219,830
 $126,023
 $253,283
 $57,798
Net realized (gains) losses and net OTTI losses on investments, net of offsets2,863
 (11,702) 8,648
 18,354
 379
Change in fair value of derivatives and embedded derivatives - index annuities, net of offsets51,099
 (98,704) 31,246
 30,086
 38,114
Change in fair value of derivatives and embedded derivatives - debt, net of income taxes61
 (1,192) 2,915
 (1,035) 53
Extinguishment of debt, net of income taxes11,516
 21,716
 
 
 171
Litigation reserve, net of offsets(916) 19
 9,580
 
 27,297
Operating income$190,646
 $163,420
 $110,187
 $133,653
 $108,947
Net realized investment (gains) losses, including OTTI7,188
 5,737
 4,429
 (18,170) 13,397
Change in fair value of derivatives and embedded derivatives - index annuities56,634
 (44,055) 79,053
 (153,267) 48,406
Change in fair value of derivatives and embedded derivatives - debt(1,265) 1,296
 104
 (2,038) 4,983
Extinguishment of debt
 
 12,503
 32,515
 
Litigation reserve(1,957) 
 (1,418) 30
 14,876
Income taxes(21,499) 13,012
 (30,048) 51,067
 (29,273)
Operating income (a non-GAAP financial measure)$122,344
 $195,820
 $190,646
 $163,420
 $110,187
Operating income per common share$2.56
 $2.49
 $1.80
 $2.25
 $1.86
$1.44
 $2.48
 $2.56
 $2.49
 $1.80
Operating income per common share—assuming dilution2.39
 2.18
 1.69
 2.12
 1.70
1.43
 2.42
 2.39
 2.18
 1.69

17


As of and for the Year Ended December 31,As of and for the Year Ended December 31,
2014 2013 2012 2011 20102016 2015 2014 2013 2012
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
Consolidated Balance Sheet Data:                  
Total investments$35,981,858
 $30,346,654
 $27,537,210
 $24,383,451
 $19,816,931
$44,757,568
 $39,570,332
 $35,981,858
 $30,346,654
 $27,537,210
Total assets43,989,734
 39,621,499
 35,133,478
 30,874,719
 26,426,763
56,053,472
 49,029,392
 43,976,689
 39,605,843
 35,122,673
Policy benefit reserves39,802,861
 35,789,655
 31,773,988
 28,118,716
 23,655,807
51,637,026
 45,495,431
 39,802,861
 35,789,655
 31,773,988
Notes payable421,679
 549,958
 309,869
 297,608
 330,835
Notes and loan payable493,755
 393,227
 413,805
 539,639
 304,473
Subordinated debentures246,243
 246,050
 245,869
 268,593
 268,435
241,853
 241,452
 241,072
 240,713
 240,460
Accumulated other comprehensive income ("AOCI")721,401
 46,196
 686,807
 457,229
 81,820
339,966
 201,663
 721,401
 46,196
 686,807
Total stockholders' equity2,139,876
 1,384,687
 1,720,237
 1,408,679
 938,047
2,291,595
 1,944,535
 2,139,876
 1,384,687
 1,720,237
                  
Other Data:                  
Life subsidiaries' statutory capital and surplus and asset valuation reserve2,327,335
 1,995,658
 1,741,638
 1,655,205
 1,456,679
2,933,193
 2,593,472
 2,327,335
 1,995,658
 1,741,638
Life subsidiaries' statutory net gain from operations before income taxes and realized capital gains (losses)467,923
 305,628
 182,057
 344,538
 322,133
144,159
 227,865
 467,923
 305,628
 182,057
Life subsidiaries' statutory net income344,666
 205,112
 79,644
 167,925
 172,865
80,699
 132,723
 344,666
 205,112
 79,644
Book value per share (b)27.93
 19.40
 27.46
 23.82
 16.07
26.04
 23.83
 27.93
 19.40
 27.46
Book value per share, excluding AOCI (b)18.52
 18.75
 16.49
 16.09
 14.67
22.17
 21.36
 18.52
 18.75
 16.49

(a)In addition to net income, we have consistently utilized operating income, operating income per common share and operating income per common share—assuming dilution, non-GAAP financial measures commonly used in the life insurance industry, as economic measures to evaluate our financial performance. Operating income equals net income adjusted to eliminate the impact of net realized gains and losses on investments including net OTTI losses recognized in operations, fair value changes in derivatives and embedded derivatives, loss on extinguishment of debt, and changes in litigation reserves. Because these items that fluctuate from year to year in a manner unrelated to core operations and we believe measures excluding their impact are useful in analyzing operating trends. The most significant adjustments to arrive at operating income eliminate the impact of fair value accounting for our fixed index annuity business and are not economic in nature bur rather impact the timing of reported results. We believe the combined presentation and evaluation of operating income together with net income provides information that may enhance an investor's understanding of our underlying results and profitability. The amounts included in the reconciliation of net income to operating income are presented net of related adjustments to amortization of deferred sales inducements and deferred policy acquisition costs and income taxes.costs.
(b)Book value per share and book value per share excluding AOCI, isnon-GAAP financial measures, are calculated as total stockholders' equity and total stockholders' equity excluding AOCI divided by the total number of shares of common stock outstanding. Since AOCI fluctuates from year to year due to unrealized changes in the fair value of available for sale investments.investments, we believe these non-GAAP financial measures provide useful supplemental information. Common shares outstanding include shares held by the NMO Deferred Compensation Trust and exclude unallocated shares held by our employee stock ownership plan—see Note 11 to our audited consolidated financial statements.

18


Item 7.    Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Management's discussion and analysis reviews our consolidated financial position at December 31, 20142016 and 2013,2015, and our consolidated results of operations for the three years in the period ended December 31, 2014,2016, and where appropriate, factors that may affect future financial performance. This analysis should be read in conjunction with our audited consolidated financial statements, notes thereto and selected consolidated financial data appearing elsewhere in this report.
Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Information
All statements, trend analyses and other information contained in this report and elsewhere (such as in filings by us with the SEC, press releases, presentations by us or our management or oral statements) relative to markets for our products and trends in our operations or financial results, as well as other statements including words such as "anticipate", "believe", "plan", "estimate", "expect", "intend" and other similar expressions, constitute forward-looking statements. We caution that these statements may and often do vary from actual results and the differences between these statements and actual results can be material. Accordingly, we cannot assure you that actual results will not differ materially from those expressed or implied by the forward-looking statements. Factors that could contribute to these differences include, among other things:
general economic conditions and other factors, including prevailing interest rate levels and stock and credit market performance which may affect (among other things) our ability to sell our products, our ability to access capital resources and the costs associated therewith, the fair value of our investments, which could result in impairments and other than temporary impairments, and certain liabilities, and the lapse rate and profitability of policies;
customer response to new products and marketing initiatives;
changes in Federal income tax laws and regulations which may affect the relative income tax advantages of our products;
increasing competition in the sale of annuities;
regulatory changes or actions, including those relating to regulation of financial services affecting (among other things) bank sales and underwriting of insurance products and regulation of the sale, underwriting and pricing of products; and
the risk factors or uncertainties listed from time to time in our filings with the SEC.
For a detailed discussion of these and other factors that might affect our performance, see Item 1A of this report.
Executive Summary
Since our formation in 1995, we have emphasized industry leading customer service to both our distribution force and our policyholders. We believe this to be a major part of our ability to attract production from our independent agent network as well as maintain a low rate of policy surrenders. Excellent customer service teamed with our ability to designoffer innovative insurance products that provide principal protection and tax deferred growth havelifetime income continued to result in significant sales of our annuity products. In 2014,2016, our sales decreasedincreased 1% to $4.2$7.1 billion which has resulted in cash and investments in excess of $36$45 billion at December 31, 2014.2016. Our sales for the last five years have ranged from $3.9 billion to $5.1$7.1 billion and we have exceeded $4 billion in sales in four of those years. We have applied a conservative investment strategy to the annuity deposits we continue to manage which has provided reliable returns on our invested assets. Our profitability has also been driven by maintaining an efficient operation.
The economic and personal investing environments continued to be conducive for high sales levels as retirees and others look to put their money in instruments that will protect their principal and provide them with consistent cash flow sources in their retirement years. However, our sales slowed in the last half of 2016 as competition in our distribution channels escalated and rates from several of our competitors were appreciably above prior levels. Sales of our products by independent agents may come under pressure during 2017 if the U.S. Department of Labor fiduciary rule is not delayed, repealed, revised or overturned through litigation.
We are currently in the midst of an unprecedented period of low interest rates.rates and low yields for investments with the credit quality we prefer which presents a strong headwind to achieving our target rate for investment spread. In response to this persistent low interest rate environment, we have been reducing policyholder crediting rates for new annuities and existing annuities since the fourth quarter of 2011. Spread results for 2014, 20132016, 2015 and 20122014 reflect the benefit from these reductions; however, the reductions in cost of money have been less than and were offset by continued lower yields available on investments including those purchased with the reinvestmentfrom investment purchases.
In August 2015, we completed an underwritten public offering of proceeds from calls of callable bonds in our investment portfolio. In 2014, we initiated additional renewal crediting rate reductions for policies issued prior to October 8, 2011. Some of the policies included in these rate reductions will not receive the latest adjustment until their 2015 policy anniversary.
The current interest rate environment with low yields for investments with the credit quality we prefer presents a strong headwind to restoring our investment spread to our 3.00% target rate. With our portfolio yield under pressure from lower yields on benchmark U.S. Treasury securities and narrower credit spreads, further adjustments to new and renewal crediting rates will be considered. We have on average 0.63% of room to reduce rates before we would reach minimum guaranteed rates on our entire December 31, 2014 in force book of business. We also implemented modest reductions in certain new money rates in October 2014 and will be reducing new money rates more extensively in early March 2015. These are the first adjustments to new money rates since the third quarter of 2013 when we increased rates in response to rising investment yields at that time. We were reluctant to reduce new money rates during 2014 for competitive reasons. However, we remain aware of our spread and return on average equity objectives and will make further adjustments to new money rates based upon changes in investing and market conditions.
Our investment spread in 2014, 2013 and 2012 (see Our Business and Profitability) was impacted by shortfalls in investment income from excess liquidity resulting from a lag in the reinvestment of proceeds of government agency bonds called for redemption. The callable government agency securities have been a cornerstone of our investment portfolio since our formation. Through the years they have provided acceptable yields that met our spread requirements without any risk-based capital charges. We went through several cycles of calls on these securities and each time we have reinvested a portion of the call redemption proceeds into new callable government agency securities. This kept cash balances low but perpetuated the call risk. However, beginning in 2012, we substantially curtailed purchases of callable government agency securities and experienced several periods during the last three years where we held excess cash and other short-term investments due to lags in the reinvestment of proceeds from bonds called for redemption during those years. See Results of OperationsNet investment income for additional information regarding our excess liquidity.

19


In 2014 and 2013, we retired $322 million aggregate principal amount of three convertible note issues. The total consideration paid to retire the convertible notes included $438 million of cash and 9.45 million9,890,000 shares of our common stock. In 2013, we issued $400stock at a public offering price of $25.25 per share, of which 5,590,000 shares were subject to forward sale agreements. We physically settled the forward sales agreements on August 1, 2016 by delivery of those shares of our common stock and contributed the $134.7 million of senior unsecured notes due 2021 (the "2021 Notes") and used thein net proceeds from the note offeringsettlement to fundthe capital and surplus of American Equity Life to support continued growth and maintain desired financial strength ratings.
On September 30, 2016, we entered into a substantial portion of the convertible note retirements. At December 31, 2014, we had $22.4credit agreement providing for a $100 million principal amount of our 3.50% Convertible Senior Notes due 2015 (the "2015 notes") outstanding. The 2015 notes mature interm loan that matures on September 201530, 2019 and will be retired at maturity if not redeemed or repurchased prior to that date. Our holding company has sufficient cash on hand and cash resources to retire the remaining 2015 notes without accessing external sources of capital such as its banka $150 million unsecured revolving line of credit or dividends from our primary life insurance subsidiary.that matures on September 30, 2021. The $100 million of loan proceeds were contributed to the capital and surplus of American Equity Life on October 3, 2016.

Our Business and Profitability
We specialize in the sale of individual annuities (primarily deferred annuities) and, to a significantly lesser extent, we also sell life insurance policies. Under U.S. generally accepted accounting principles ("GAAP"), premium collections for deferred annuities are reported as deposit liabilities instead of as revenues. Similarly, cash payments to policyholders are reported as decreases in the liabilities for policyholder account balances and not as expenses. Sources of revenues for products accounted for as deposit liabilities are net investment income, surrender charges assessed against policy withdrawals and other chargesfees deducted from thepolicyholder account balances of policyholders,for lifetime income benefit riders, net realized gains (losses) on investments and changes in fair value of derivatives. Components of expenses for products accounted for as deposit liabilities are interest sensitive and index product benefits (primarily interest credited to account balances), changes in fair value of embedded derivatives, amortization of deferred sales inducements and deferred policy acquisition costs, other operating costs and expenses and income taxes.
Our business model contemplates continued growth in invested assets and operating income while maintaining a high quality investment portfolio that will not experience significant losses from impairments of invested assets. We are committed to maintaining a high quality investment portfolio with limited exposure to below investment grade securities and other riskier assets. Growth in invested assets is predicated on a continuation of our high sales achievements of the last five years while at the same time maintaining a high level of retention of the funds received. The economic and personal investing environments continue
Our profitability depends in large part upon:
the amount of assets under our management,
investment spreads we earn on our policyholder account balances,
our ability to be conducive for high sales levels as retirees and others look to put their money in instruments that will protect their principal and provide them with consistent cash flow sources in their retirement years. We are committed to maintaining a high qualitymanage our investment portfolio with limited exposure to below investment grade securitiesmaximize returns and other riskier assets.minimize risks such as interest rate changes and defaults or impairment of investments,
our ability to manage interest rates credited to policyholders and costs of the options purchased to fund the annual index credits on our fixed index annuities,
our ability to manage the costs of acquiring new business (principally commissions to agents and bonuses credited to policyholders), and
our ability to manage our operating expenses.
Earnings from products accounted for as deposit liabilities are primarily generated from the excess of net investment income earned over the interest credited or the cost of providing index credits to the policyholder, or the "investment spread." Our investment spread is summarized as follows:
Year Ended December 31,Year Ended December 31,
2014 2013 20122016 2015 2014
Average yield on invested assets4.90% 4.98% 5.28%4.51% 4.73% 4.90%
Aggregate cost of money2.10% 2.26% 2.58%1.90% 1.96% 2.10%
Aggregate investment spread2.80% 2.72% 2.70%2.61% 2.77% 2.80%
  
Impact of:  
Investment yield - additional prepayment income0.07% 0.06% 0.06%0.06% 0.08% 0.07%
Cost of money benefit from over hedging0.03% 0.02% 0.01%
Cost of money benefit from over-hedging0.01% 0.04% 0.03%
The cost of money for fixed index annuities and average crediting rates for fixed rate annuities are computed based upon policyholder account balances and do not include the impact of amortization of deferred sales inducements. See Critical Accounting Policies—Deferred Policy Acquisition Costs and Deferred Sales Inducements. With respect to our fixed index annuities, the cost of money includes the average crediting rate on amounts allocated to the fixed rate strategy, expenses we incur to fund the annual index credits and where applicable, minimum guaranteed interest credited. Proceeds received upon expiration or early termination of call options purchased to fund annual index credits are recorded as part of the change in fair value of derivatives, and are largely offset by an expense for interest credited to annuity policyholder account balances. See Critical Accounting Policies—Policy Liabilities for Fixed Index Annuities and Financial Condition—Derivative Instruments.
Our profitability depends in large part upon the amountRenewal rate adjustments covering $16 - 17 billion of assets under our management, investment spreads we earn on our policyholder account balances, our abilityvalues began on September 1, 2016, and should lower the overall cost of money by 8 basis points when fully implemented. In addition, we began applying renewal rate adjustments on $7.4 billion of policyholder account values beginning on December 6, 2016. These adjustments will be implemented over the next 12 to manage our investment portfolio15 months on policy anniversary dates and are expected to maximize returns and minimize risks such as interest rate changes and defaults or impairment of investments, our ability to manage interest rates credited to policyholders and costsreduce a portion of the options purchased to fund the annual index credits0.49% cost of money differential between existing rates and guaranteed minimum rates we had at December 31, 2016.
We reduced new money rates on many of our fixed index annuities,annuity products by approximately 10 basis points in April 2016 and reduced new money rates on many of our abilitynon-bonus fixed index annuity products by approximately 10-25 basis points in August 2016. We also reduced rates three times on our multi-year rate guaranteed annuity products for a total of 55-85 basis points during the second and third quarters of 2016. Investment yields available to manageus in the coststhird and fourth quarters of acquiring new business (principally commissions2016 were significantly lower than the first six months of the year. Investment yields at these levels will continue to agentsput downward pressure on our investment spread and bonuses credited to policyholders) and our ability to manage our operating expenses.product returns.

20


Results of Operations for the Three Years Ended December 31, 20142016
Annuity deposits by product type collected during 2016, 2015 and 2014 2013 and 2012, were as follows:
 Year Ended December 31, Year Ended December 31,
Product Type 2014 2013 2012 2016 2015 2014
 (Dollars in thousands) (Dollars in thousands)
Fixed index annuities $3,999,439
 $3,882,424
 $3,434,226
 $5,724,758
 $6,791,689
 $3,999,439
Annual reset fixed rate annuities 57,273
 71,944
 98,821
 64,317
 45,182
 57,273
Multi-year fixed rate annuities 103,293
 205,978
 249,228
 1,303,273
 214,356
 103,293
Single premium immediate annuities 24,580
 52,142
 164,657
 35,851
 32,752
 24,580
Total before coinsurance ceded 4,184,585
 4,212,488
 3,946,932
 7,128,199
 7,083,979
 4,184,585
Coinsurance ceded 171,124
 182,616
 203,734
 1,736,054
 471,822
 171,124
Net after coinsurance ceded $4,013,461
 $4,029,872
 $3,743,198
 $5,392,145
 $6,612,157
 $4,013,461
Annuity deposits before coinsurance ceded decreasedincreased 1% during 20142016 compared to 20132015 and increased 7%69% during 20132015 compared to 2012.2014. Over these years, we have remained consistently in the top three companies for sales of fixed index annuities according to Wink's Sales and Market Report published by Wink, Inc. We attribute the continuing significant sales ofto our products to several factors includingattractive product offerings, our consistent presence in the highly competitive rates on our products,fixed index annuity market, our continued strong relationships with and excellent service provided to our national marketing organizations and independent insurance agents,distribution partners, the increased attractiveness of safe money products in volatile markets and lower interest rates on competing products such as bank certificates of depositdeposit. 2016 sales levels were supported by sales of multi-year rate guaranteed (MYGA) fixed annuity products. These products are often emphasized by banks which are an expanding source of distribution for Eagle Life. Our rates on these products were more competitive during the first half of 2016 and together with the larger number of bank distribution relationships, translated into a significant increase in sales of those products.
Annuity deposits before coinsurance ceded from fixed index annuities decreased 16% as compared to 2015. We had robust sales of fixed index annuities by independent agents during the final three quarters of 2015 following the withdrawal in the first quarter of 2015 of a competitor’s guaranteed income product enhancements.that had been the source of significant competition. This competitor has returned to the market in 2016 and in general the market in the independent agent distribution channel has been more competitive in 2016. Declines in fixed index annuity sales from independent agents has been partially offset by increases in sales from banks and broker-dealers which were up 65% in 2016 to $610.6 million. These increases were attributable to an expansion in the number of distribution relationships selling Eagle Life's fixed index annuities from 42 relationships as of December 31, 2015 to 53 relationships as of December 31, 2016 and increased sales from many of the relationships that were selling Eagle Life's fixed index annuities in both periods.
We believe our existing statutory capitalcoinsure 80% of the premiums received from (1) MYGA fixed annuity products, (2) fixed index annuities sold by Eagle Life through broker/dealers and surplusbanks and (3) certain non-bonus fixed index annuity products sold by American Equity Life from August 1, 2016 through December 31, 2016. The increases in coinsurance ceded premiums are attributable to the statutory surplus we expect to generate internallyincreases in premiums from these sources. The premiums ceded for American Equity Life's non-bonus fixed index annuities issued from August 1, 2016 through statutory earnings will support a higher level of new business growth than in previous years. However, while we have the capital resources to accept more business than was sold in 2014, our capacity is not unlimited and sales growth must be matched with available resources to maintain desired financial strength ratings from credit rating agencies. Should sales growth accelerate to levels that cannot be supported by internal capital generation, we would intend to obtain capital from external sources to facilitate such growth.December 31, 2016 were $198.1 million.
Net income, in general, has been positively impacted by the growth in the volume of business in force and the investment spread earned on this business. The average amount of annuity liabilitiesaccount balances outstanding (net of annuity liabilities ceded under coinsurance agreements) increased 13%14% to $33.4$43.5 billion for the year ended December 31, 20142016 compared to $29.5$38.1 billion in 20132015 and 14% for the year ended December 31, 20132015 compared to $26.0$33.4 billion in 2012.2014. Our investment spread measured in dollars was $809.5 million, $695.6$1.0 billion, $924.8 million, and $596.7$809.5 million for the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014, 2013 and 2012.respectively. As discussed above,previously mentioned, our investment spread in 2014, 2013 and 2012 has been negatively impacted by both the extended low interest rate environment and our excess liquidity due to calls of our United States government agency securities (see Net investment income).
Net income is also impacted by the change in fair value of derivatives and embedded derivatives which fluctuates from year to year based upon changes in fair values of call options purchased to fund the annual index credits for fixed index annuities and changes in interest rates used to discount the embedded derivative liability. Net income for the years ended December 31, 20142016 and 20122014 was negatively impacted by decreases in the discount rates used to estimate our embedded derivative liabilities, while net income for the year ended December 31, 20132015 was positively impacted by increases in the discount rates used to estimate our embedded derivative liabilities. Net income for the year ended December 31, 2014 was also positively impacted by revisions of assumptions used in determining fixed index annuity embedded derivatives that were made in the second quarter of 2014. These revisions, which consisted of changes in the lapse and expected costs of annual call options assumptions, decreased the change in the fair value of embedded derivatives for the year ended December 31, 2014 by $62.6 million, which after related adjustments to deferred sales inducements and deferred policy acquisition costs and income taxes, increased net income for the year ended December 31, 2014 by $14.8 million (see Change in fair value of embedded derivatives).

We periodically revise the key assumptions used in the calculation of amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs and deferred sales inducements retrospectively through an unlocking process when estimates of current or future gross profits/margins (including the impact of realized investment gains and losses) to be realized from a group of products are revised. The impact ofIn addition, we periodically revise the assumptions used in determining reserves held for lifetime income benefit riders as experience develops that is different from our assumptions.
Net income includes effects from unlocking on our results of operations, including the impact of account balance true ups and adjustmentsrevisions to future period assumptions used in determining reserves for interest margins, surrenders and certain expenses, waslifetime income benefit riders as follows:
 Year Ended December 31,
 2014 2013 2012
 (Dollars in thousands)
Increased (decreased) amortization of deferred sales inducements$(12,595) $(11,138) $(199)
Increased (decreased) amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs(35,527) (18,519) 3,738
Increased (decreased) net income30,990
 19,099
 (2,243)
 Year Ended December 31,
 2016 2015 2014
 (Dollars in thousands)
Increase (decrease) in amortization of deferred sales inducements$35,760
 $(5,612) $(12,595)
Increase (decrease) in amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs48,164
 (10,970) (35,527)
Increase in interest sensitive and index product benefits42,002
 18,313
 12,428
Increase (decrease) in net income(81,224) (1,117) 22,986

21

TableWe review these assumptions quarterly and as a result of Contents

Net income for 2014 was negatively impactedthese reviews, we made adjustments to assumptions used in the calculation of amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs and net income for 2013deferred sales inducements in the first and 2012 was positively impactedthird quarters of 2016. During the first quarter of 2016, we made adjustments to lower future spread assumptions after comparing investment spread assumptions to actual investment spreads earned in the three months ended December 31, 2015 and March 31, 2016 and determining that decreases in the average yield earned on invested assets resulting from the continued low interest rate environment were creating shortfalls in investment spread and gross profits. During the third quarter of 2016, we made adjustments to extend the period of time in which we assume investment spread will grade up to our long-term spread targets by an additional two years as yields obtained on investments purchased in the third quarter of 2016 were much lower than we had anticipated as a revisionresult of the overall decline in investment yields that followed the Brexit vote. In addition, during the third quarter of 2016, revisions to assumptions used in determining liabilitiesreserves held for lifetime income benefit riders. Theseriders described below resulted in a decrease in estimated future gross profits.

The most significant revisions to assumptions used in the calculation of deferred policy acquisition costs and deferred sales inducements in 2015 and 2014 were account balance true-ups, which were favorable to us due to stronger equity market performance than we assumed, favorable adjustments to lapse assumptions to reflect better persistency experienced than assumed and unfavorable adjustments to investment spread to reflect lower spreads being earned than assumed. In 2015, the favorable impact of the account balance true-up and lapse assumption change was largely offset by reductions in estimated future gross profits attributable to revisions to the assumptions for the lifetime income benefit rider liability described below.
The 2016, 2015 and 2014 revisions to reserves for lifetime income benefit riders were consistent with unlocking for deferred policy acquisition costs and deferred sales inducements.inducements described above. The 2016 revisions were primarily due to actual index credits on policies being lower than projected over the past four quarters. The most significant assumption change generating the 2015 negative impact of these revisions on net income was an increase to the primary election age to begin receiving lifetime income from 67 to 70 as follows:
 Year Ended December 31,
 2014 2013 2012
 (Dollars in thousands)
Increased (decreased) interest sensitive and index product benefits$12,428
 $(1,753) $(2,197)
Increased (decreased) net income(8,004) 1,129
 1,415
our experience has shown that age 70 is the most popular age at which policyholders elect to begin receiving lifetime income benefit payments. The lifetime income benefit payments are determined by applying a payout factor to the rider's benefit base. The payout factors vary by the age at the time the lifetime income is elected. In early versions of the rider, the age band for payout factors was 10 years (i.e. 60-69; 70-79). As a result, policyholders have an incentive to defer their lifetime income election until age 70, when the payout factor stepped up. Subsequent versions of the rider reduced the age bands between payout factors to five years and the rider we currently sell has a different payout factor for every age. With these structures, assumption revisions from any further developments in our experience for primary election age should have a smaller impact than what was experienced in 2015.
In 2014, we retired $138 million aggregate principal amount of two issues of convertible notes. The loss on retirement was $12.5 million ($11.5 million after income taxes). In connection with the retirement of the 2015 notes, we entered into early termination agreements for a corresponding amount of the related 2015 notes hedges and the 2015 warrants. The impact of these partial unwinds decreased the change in fair value of derivatives and net income for the year ended December 31, 2014 by $6.3 million and $3.7 million, respectively (see Note 5 to our audited consolidated financial statements).
In 2013, we retired $184 million aggregate principal amount of three issues of convertible notes. The loss on retirement was $32.5 million ($21.7 million after income taxes). In connection with the retirement of the 2015 notes, we entered into early termination agreements for a corresponding amount of the related 2015 notes hedges and the 2015 warrants. The impact of the partial unwinds decreased the change in fair value of derivatives and net income for the year ended December 31, 2013 by $5.8 million and $3.4 million, respectively (see Note 5 to our audited consolidated financial statements).
In 2012, we established an estimated litigation liability of $17.5 million ($9.6 million after offsets for income taxes and adjustments to deferred policy acquisition costs and deferred sales inducements) based upon developments in mediation discussions concerning potential settlement terms of a purported class action lawsuit. See Note 13 to our audited consolidated financial statements.
Operating income, a non-GAAP financial measure (see reconciliation to net income in Item 6. Selected Consolidated Financial Data) decreased 38% to $122.3 million in 2016 and increased 17%3% to $195.8 million in 2015 from $190.6 million in 2014 and increased 48% to $163.4 million in 2013 from $110.2 million in 2012.2014.
In addition to net income, we have consistently utilized operating income, a non-GAAP financial measure commonly used in the life insurance industry, as an economic measure to evaluate our financial performance. Operating income equals net income adjusted to eliminate the impact of net realized gains and losses on investments including net OTTI losses recognized in operations, fair value changes in derivatives and embedded derivatives, loss on extinguishment of debt, and changes in litigation reserves. Because these items that fluctuate from year to year in a manner unrelated to core operations, and we believe measures excluding their impact are useful in analyzing operating trends. The most significant adjustments to arrive at operating income eliminate the impact of fair value accounting for our fixed index annuity business and are not economic in nature but rather impact the timing of reported results. We believe the combined presentation and evaluation of operating income together with net income provides information that may enhance an investor's understanding of our underlying results and profitability.

Operating income is not a substitute for net income determined in accordance with GAAP. The adjustments made to derive operating income are important to understanding our overall results from operations and, if evaluated without proper context, operating income possesses material limitations. As an example, we could produce a low level of net income in a given period, despite strong operating performance, if in that period we experience significant net realized losses from our investment portfolio. We could also produce a high level of net income in a given period, despite poor operating performance, if in that period we generate significant net realized gains from our investment portfolio. As an example of another limitation of operating income, it does not include the decrease in cash flows expected to be collected as a result of credit loss OTTI. Therefore, our management reviews net realized investment gains (losses) and analyses of our net investment income, including impacts related to OTTI write-downs, in connection with their review of our investment portfolio. In addition, our management examines net income as part of their review of our overall financial results.
The impact ofOperating income in 2016, 2015 and 2014 includes effects from unlocking on operatingand revisions to assumptions used in determining reserves for living income wasbenefit riders as follows:
 Year Ended December 31,
 2014 2013 2012
 (Dollars in thousands)
Increased (decreased) amortization of deferred sales inducements$(10,713) $(12,575) $2,451
Increased (decreased) amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs(33,027) (20,460) 7,288
Increased (decreased) operating income28,169
 21,274
 (6,285)
 Year Ended December 31,
 2016 2015 2014
 (Dollars in thousands)
Increase (decrease) in amortization of deferred sales inducements$36,127
 $(478) $(10,713)
Increase (decrease) in amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs47,765
 (4,260) (33,027)
Increase in interest sensitive and index product benefits42,002
 18,313
 12,428
Increase (decrease) in operating income(81,202) (8,756) 20,165
The revision of assumptions in 2014, 2013 and 2012 used in determining liabilities for lifetime income benefit riders had the same effect on operating income as it had on net income as discussed previously.
Premiums and other considerations decreased 28% to $32.6 million in 2014 and 41% to $45.3 million in 2013 from $76.7 million in 2012. These revenues are comprised of life insurance premiums and premiums from life contingent single premium immediate annuities including life contingent supplemental contracts issued upon annuitization of deferred annuities. Life insurance premiums have remained consistent throughout the periods presented while premiums from life contingent single premium immediate annuities ($21.8 million, $34.8 million and $63.8 million in 2014, 2013 and 2012, respectively) have decreased over the periods, because we have adjusted the rates offered on these products to be less competitive in the low interest rate environment.

22

Table of Contents

Annuity product charges (surrender charges assessed against policy withdrawals and fees deducted from policyholder account balances for lifetime income benefit riders) increased 15%27% to$173.6 million in 2016 and 14% to $136.2 million in 2015 from $119.0 million in 2014 and 16% to $103.6 million in 2013 from $89.0 million in 2012.2014. The components of annuity product charges are set forth in the table that follows:
Year Ended December 31,Year Ended December 31,
2014 2013 20122016 2015 2014
(Dollars in thousands)(Dollars in thousands)
Surrender charges$47,500
 $49,193
 $45,190
$51,577
 $46,614
 $47,500
Lifetime income benefit riders (LIBR) fees71,490
 54,398
 43,816
122,002
 89,554
 71,490
$118,990
 $103,591
 $89,006
$173,579
 $136,168
 $118,990
          
Withdrawals from annuity policies subject to surrender charges$387,274
 $342,087
 $335,552
$429,090
 $373,166
 $387,274
Average surrender charge collected on withdrawals subject to surrender charges12.3% 14.4% 13.4%12.0% 12.5% 12.3%
          
Fund values on policies subject to LIBR fees$12,250,068
 $9,904,857
 $8,108,573
$17,809,659
 $14,296,046
 $12,250,068
Weighted average per policy LIBR fee0.58% 0.55% 0.54%0.69% 0.63% 0.58%
The increases in annuity product charges were primarily attributable to increases in fees assessed for lifetime income benefit riders due to a larger volume of business in force subject to the fee.fee and and an increase in the average fees being charged as compared to prior periods. See Interest sensitive and index product benefits below for corresponding expense recognized on lifetime income benefit riders. Surrender charges increased in 2016 due to an increase in withdrawals from annuity policies subject to surrender charges. Surrender charges decreased in 2014 because the 2013 amount included2015 as withdrawals from annuity policies subject to surrender charges of $4.7 million deducted from California policyholders surrendering their policiesdecreased as a condition of receiving certain benefits in a national class action lawsuit settlement. The increase in surrender charges in 2013 was primarily attributablecompared to the $4.7 million amount associated with the class action lawsuit settlement.2014.
Net investment income increased 11%9% to $1.8 billion in 2016 and 10% to $1.7 billion in 2015 from $1.5 billion in 2014 and 8% to $1.4 billion in 2013 from $1.3 billion in 2012.2014. The increases were principally attributable to the growth in our annuity business and corresponding increases in our invested assets. Average invested assets excluding derivative instruments (on an amortized cost basis) increased 13%15% to $41.1 billion in 2016 and 14% to $35.9 billion in 2015 compared to $31.3 billion in 2014 and 14% to $27.8 billion in 2013 compared to $24.4 billion in 2012.2014. The average yield earned on average invested assets was 4.90%4.51%, 4.98%4.73% and 5.28%4.90% for 2014, 20132016, 2015 and 2012,2014, respectively.
The decrease in yield earned on average invested assets in 20142016, 2015 and 20132014 was attributable to yields on investments purchased ininvestment of new premiums and portfolio cash flows during those periods and 2012 being lower than2013 at rates below the overall portfolio yield. In addition, net investment incomeyield and higher cash balances. The average yield were negatively impacted by a lag in reinvestment of proceeds from bonds calledon fixed income securities purchased and commercial mortgage loans funded was 3.66%, 3.87% and 4.22% for redemption duringthe years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014, 2013 and 2012 into new assets causing excess liquidity held in low yielding cash and other short-term investments.respectively. The average balance held infor cash and short-term investments was $0.9 billion, $0.3 billion and $0.4 billion $1.0 billionin 2016, 2015 and $1.7 billion in 2014, 2013 and 2012, respectively. The average yield on our cash and short-term investments was 0.05%, 0.07% and 0.07% in 2016, 2015 in 2014, 0.38% in 2013, and 0.25% in 2012. Additionally, net investment income and average yieldrespectively. The unfavorable impact from these items was positively impactedpartially offset by prepayment and fee income received resulting in additional net investment income of $23.8 million, $26.9 million and $22.3 million, $15.7 millionin 2016, 2015 and $14.8 million, in 2014, 2013 and 2012, respectively.

Change in fair value of derivatives consists of call options purchased to fund annual index credits on fixed index annuities, the 2015 notes hedges and 2015 warrants related to our 2015 notes and an interest rate swap and interest rate caps that hedge our floating rate subordinated debentures. The components of change in fair value of derivatives are as follows:
Year Ended December 31,Year Ended December 31,
2014 2013 20122016 2015 2014
(Dollars in thousands)(Dollars in thousands)
Call options:          
Gain on option expiration$707,520
 $554,218
 $80,782
Gain (loss) on option expiration$(282,574) $(464,027) $707,520
Change in unrealized gains/losses(185,573) 377,785
 147,828
447,603
 136,106
 (185,573)
2015 notes hedges(8,934) 145,751
 (2,488)
 (4,516) (8,934)
2015 warrants
 (9,568) 
Interest rate swap(4,863) 4,973
 (4,261)(482) (2,341) (4,863)
Interest rate caps(3,325) 2,856
 (723)(328) (1,368) (3,325)
$504,825
 $1,076,015
 $221,138
$164,219
 $(336,146) $504,825

23

Table of Contents

The differences between the change in fair value of derivatives between years for call options are primarily due to the performance of the indices upon which our call options are based. A substantial portion of our call options are based upon the S&P 500 Index with the remainder based upon other equity and bond market indices. The range of index appreciation (after applicable caps, participation rates and asset fees) for options expiring during these years is as follows:
Year Ended December 31,Year Ended December 31,
2014 2013 20122016 2015 2014
S&P 500 Index  
Point-to-point strategy1.0 - 11.5% 1.5 - 11.5% 0.0 - 12.8%0.0 - 8.2% 0.0 - 8.9% 1.0 - 11.5%
Monthly average strategy0.8 - 11.1% 0.0 - 15.7% 0.0 - 19.3%0.0 - 8.3% 0.0 - 9.0% 0.8 - 11.1%
Monthly point-to-point strategy0.0 - 19.9% 0.0 - 21.7% 0.0 - 18.0%0.0 - 5.0% 0.0 - 12.1% 0.0 - 19.9%
Fixed income (bond index) strategies0.0 - 10.0% 0.0 - 8.0% 1.6 - 10.0%0.0 - 10.0% 0.0 - 10.0% 0.0 - 10.0%
The change in fair value of derivatives is also influenced by the aggregate costs of options purchased. The aggregate cost of options has increased primarily due to an increased amount of fixed index annuities in force. The aggregate cost of options is also influenced by the amount of policyholder funds allocated to the various indices and market volatility which affects option pricing. See Critical Accounting Policies - Policy Liabilities for Fixed Index Annuities.
Our 2015 notes matured and were extinguished on September 15, 2015, and the 2015 notes hedges expired on that same date. The fair value of the 2015 notes hedges changeschanged based upon changes in the price of our common stock, interest rates, stock price volatility, dividend yield and the time to expiration of the 2015 notes hedges. Similarly, the fair value of the conversion option obligation to the holders of the 2015 notes changeschanged based upon these same factors and the conversion option obligation iswas accounted for as an embedded derivative liability with changes in fair value reported in the Change in fair value of embedded derivatives. The amount of the change in fair value of the 2015 notes hedges has historically beenwas typically equal to the amount of the change in the related embedded derivative liability and there has beentypically was an offsetting expense in the change in fair value of embedded derivatives. Due to the partial unwind agreements we entered into in 2014, the decrease in the change in the fair value of the 2015 notes embedded derivative conversion liability exceeded the decrease in the fair value of the 2015 notes hedges by $10.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2014. Due to the partial unwind agreements we entered into in 2013, the amount of the change in fair value of the 2015 notes hedges was $3.8 million more than the amount of the change in the related embedded conversion derivative liability for the year ended December 31, 2013. See Note 5 to our audited consolidated financial statements for a discussion of the unwind agreements, the 2015 notes hedges and the 2015 notes embedded derivative conversion liability.
The 2015 warrants were to be settled in shares of our common stock and accordingly were classified as equity in our consolidated balance sheets, and the changes in fair value of the 2015 warrants were not recognized in the consolidated financial statements. In conjunction with the retirement of a portion of the 2015 notes in 2014 and 2013 and related early termination of a corresponding portion of the 2015 notes hedges, a corresponding amount of the 2015 warrants were also terminated in 2014 and 2013 prior to maturity and settled in cash rather than shares of our common stock. Accordingly, changes in the fair value of the 2015 warrants that were terminated in 2013 prior to maturity from the dates the early termination agreements were executed through the dates of settlement are included in the consolidated statement of operations for the year ended December 31, 2013. The fair value of the warrants that were settled in cash in 2014 did not change after reclassification as they were settled in cash at the time the agreements were executed. See Note 5 to our audited consolidated financial statements for a discussion of the 2015 warrants.

24

Table of Contents

Net realized gains (losses) on investments, excluding OTTI losses include gains and losses on the sale of securities and impairment losses on mortgage loans on real estate which fluctuate from year to year due to changes in the interest rate and economic environment and the timing of the sale of investments, as well as gains (losses) recognized on real estate owned due to any sales and impairments on long-lived assets. The componentsSee Note 3 to our audited consolidated financial statements for a detailed presentation of net realizedthe types of investments that generated the gains (losses) on investments are set forth in the table that follows:.
 Year Ended December 31,
 2014 2013 2012
 (Dollars in thousands)
Available for sale fixed maturity securities:     
Gross realized gains$3,273
 $39,079
 $10,906
Gross realized losses(1,006) (6,170) (562)
 2,267
 32,909
 10,344
Equity securities:     
Gross realized gains
 9,571
 562
      
Other investments:     
Gain on sale of real estate2,454
 2,144
 5,149
Loss on sale of real estate(231) (1,317) 
Impairment losses on real estate(2,441) (1,195) (5,677)
 (218) (368) (528)
Mortgage loans on real estate:     
Increase in allowance for credit losses(6,052) (5,621) (16,832)
Recovery of specific allowance
 4,070
 
 (6,052) (1,551) (16,832)
 $(4,003) $40,561
 $(6,454)
Losses on available for sale fixed maturity securities were realized primarily due to strategies to reposition the fixed maturity security portfolio that resulted in improved net investment income, risk or duration profiles as they pertain to our asset liability management. Two corporate issuesSecurities were sold at a losslosses in 20132016 and 2015 due to our long-term fundamental long-term concern with the issuer'sissuers' ability to meet itstheir future financial obligations. See Note 4 to our audited consolidated financial statements for additional discussion of allowance for credit losses recognized on mortgage loans on real estate.
Net OTTI losses recognized in operations decreasedincreased to $22.7 million in 2016 and increased to $19.5 million in 2015 from $2.6 million in 20142014. The impairments recognized in 2016 were primarily on three corporate securities with exposure to the telecommunications, materials and decreasedenergy sectors and two asset-backed securities with exposure to $6.2 millionthe energy sector. The impairments recognized in 2013 from $14.9 million in 2012.2015 were primarily on two corporate securities with exposure to the metals and mining sector and one asset-backed security with exposure to the energy sector. The impairments recognized in 2014 2013 and 2012 were primarily on residential mortgage backed securities and were principally due to changes of assumptions regarding loss severity of a number of securities we hold which affected our ongoing analysis of expected cash flow projections. See Financial Condition—Investments and Note 3 to our audited consolidated financial statements for additional discussion of write downs of securities for other than temporary impairments.
Insurance policy benefits and changes in future policy benefits decreased 21% to $41.8 million in 2014 and 35% to $53.1 million in 2013 from $81.5 million in 2012. These expenses include amounts for life insurance policies and life contingent single premium immediate annuities including life contingent supplemental contracts issued upon annuitization of deferred annuities. Amounts for life insurance policies have remained consistent throughout the periods presented while amounts related to life contingent single premium immediate annuities ($34.1 million, $46.1 million and $73.4 million in 2014, 2013 and 2012, respectively) have decreased over the periods primarily because the related premiums have decreased as discussed above under Premiums and other considerations.
Interest sensitive and index product benefits increaseddecreased 16%25% to$0.7 billion in 2016 and decreased 34% to $1.0 billion in 2015 from $1.5 billion in 2014 and 57% to $1.3 billion in 2013 from $808.5 million in 2012.2014. The components of interest sensitive and index product benefits are summarized as follows:
Year Ended December 31,Year Ended December 31,
2014 2013 20122016 2015 2014
(Dollars in thousands)(Dollars in thousands)
Index credits on index policies$1,096,504
 $908,717
 $447,393
$267,995
 $587,705
 $1,096,504
Interest credited (including changes in minimum guaranteed interest for fixed index annuities)284,577
 310,369
 319,121
276,032
 258,870
 284,577
Lifetime income benefit riders92,619
 53,781
 41,965
181,445
 121,478
 92,619
$1,473,700
 $1,272,867
 $808,479
$725,472
 $968,053
 $1,473,700

25

Table of Contents

The increaseschanges in index credits were attributable to changes in the level of appreciation of the underlying indices (see discussion above under Change in fair value of derivatives) and the amount of funds allocated by policyholders to the respective index options. Total proceeds received upon expiration of the call options purchased to fund the annual index credits were $1.1 billion, $910.4$272.3 million, $602.4 million and $447.2 million$1.1 billion for the years ended December 31, 2014, 20132016, 2015 and 2012,2014, respectively. The decreasesincrease in interest credited werein 2016 was primarily due to decreasesan increase in the total account value of annuity liabilities outstanding receiving a fixed rate of interest. The decrease in interest credited in 2015 was primarily due to a decrease in the average rate credited to the annuity liabilities outstanding receiving a fixed rate of interest. The average amount of annuity liabilities outstanding (net of annuity liabilities ceded under coinsurance agreements) increased 13%14% to $43.5 billion in 2016 and 14% to $38.1 billion in 2015 from $33.4 billion in 2014 and 14% to $29.5 billion in 2013 from $26.0 billion in 2012.2014. The increases in benefits recognized for lifetime income benefit riders were due to increases in the number of policies with lifetime income benefit riders and correlates to the increase in fees discussed in Annuity product charges, and in 2014, the impact of revisions to assumptions used in determining reserves held for lifetime income benefit riders. For 2013 and 2012, the impact of revisions to assumptions used in determining reserves held for lifetime income benefit riders partially offset the increase in expense attributable to a larger volume of policies with the rider. See Net income above for discussion of the impact of changes in the assumptions used in determining reserves for lifetime income benefit riders for the years ended December 31, 2014, 20132016, 2015 and 2012.2014.
The reserve (net of coinsurance ceded) held for lifetime income benefit riders was $533.4 million and $352.0 million at December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively.
Amortization of deferred sales inducements decreased 48% to $131.4 million, in 2014 and increased 190% to $253.1 million in 2013 from $87.2 million in 2012. In general, amortization of deferred sales inducements has been increasing each year due to growth in our annuity business and the deferral of sales inducements incurred with respect to sales of premium bonus annuity products. Bonus products represented 95%88%, 97%89% and 97%89% of our net annuity deposits during 2014, 20132016, 2015 and 2012,2014, respectively. The increaseincreases in amortization from these factors hashave been affected by amortization associated with (1) fair value accounting for derivatives and embedded derivatives utilized in our fixed index annuity business, amortization associated with the(2) net realized gains (losses) on investments and net OTTI losses recognized in operations and amortization associated with(3) changes in litigation reserves. Fair value accounting for derivatives and embedded derivatives utilized in our fixed index annuity business creates differences in the recognition of revenues and expenses from derivative instruments including the embedded derivative liabilities in our fixed index annuity contracts. The change in fair value of the embedded derivatives will not correspond to the change in fair value of the derivatives (purchased call options), because the purchased call options are one-year options while the options valued in the fair value of embedded derivatives cover the expected lives of the contracts which typically exceed ten years. Amortization of deferred sales inducements is summarized as follows:
Year Ended December 31,Year Ended December 31,
2014 2013 20122016 2015 2014
(Dollars in thousands)(Dollars in thousands)
Amortization of deferred sales inducements before gross profit adjustments$174,799
 $143,415
 $136,254
$274,309
 $209,051
 $174,799
Gross profit adjustments:          
Fair value accounting for derivatives and embedded derivatives(42,865) 103,172
 (45,010)(21,678) 1,976
 (42,865)
Net realized gains (losses) on investments, net OTTI losses recognized in operations
and changes in litigation reserves
(515) 6,526
 (4,087)(1,465) (1,637) (515)
Amortization of deferred sales inducements after gross profit adjustments$131,419
 $253,113
 $87,157
$251,166
 $209,390
 $131,419
See Net income and Operating income, (aa non-GAAP financial measure)measure, above for discussion of the impact of unlocking on amortization of deferred sales inducements for the years ended December 31, 2014, 20132016, 2015 and 2012.2014. See Critical Accounting Policies—Deferred Policy Acquisition Costs and Deferred Sales Inducements.

Change in fair value of embedded derivatives includes changes in the fair value of our fixed index annuity embedded derivatives and changes in the fair value of the embedded derivative related to the conversion option of our 2015 notes and, in 2014, our 2029 notes (see Notes 5 and 9 to our audited consolidated financial statements). The components of change in fair value of embedded derivatives are as follows:
Year Ended December 31,Year Ended December 31,
2014 2013 20122016 2015 2014
(Dollars in thousands)(Dollars in thousands)
Fixed index annuities—embedded derivatives$47,548
 $(8,006) $289,387
$145,045
 $(825,668) $(532,337)
Other changes in difference between policy benefit reserves computed using derivative accounting vs. long-duration contracts accounting398,420
 365,486
 579,885
2015 notes embedded conversion derivative(19,036) 141,974
 (2,488)
 (4,516) (19,036)
2029 notes embedded conversion derivative3,809
 
 

 
 3,809
$32,321
 $133,968
 $286,899
$543,465
 $(464,698) $32,321

26

Table of Contents

The change in fair value of the fixed index annuity embedded derivatives resulted from (i) changes in the expected index credits on the next policy anniversary dates, which are related to the change in fair value of the call options acquired to fund those index credits discussed above in Change in fair value of derivatives; (ii) changes in discount rates used in estimating our embedded derivative liabilities; and (iii) the growth in the host component of the policy liability. The amounts presented as "Other changes in difference between policy benefit reserves computed using derivative accounting vs. long-duration contracts accounting" represents the total change in the difference between policy benefit reserves for fixed index annuities computed under the derivative accounting standard and the long-duration contracts accounting standard at each balance sheet date, less the change in fair value of our fixed index annuities embedded derivative. See Critical Accounting Policies—Policy Liabilities for Fixed Index Annuities. The primary reasons for the increase in the change in fair value of the fixed index annuity embedded derivatives for 20142016 were decreases in the discount rates used in estimating our embedded derivative liabilities offset by decreasesand increases in the expected index credits on the next policy anniversary dates resulting from decreasesincreases in the fair value of the call options acquired to fund thosethese index credits.credits during 2016 as compared to 2015. The primary reasonreasons for the decrease in the change in fair value of the fixed index annuity embedded derivatives in 2013 was an increasefor 2015 were increases in the discount rates used in estimating our embedded derivative liabilities. The primary reasons for the increase in the change in fair value of the fixed index annuity embedded derivatives during 2012 were increasesliabilities and decreases in the expected index credits that resultedon the next policy anniversary dates resulting from increasesdecreases in the fair value of the call options acquired to fund these index credits and decreases in the discount rates used in estimating our embedded derivative liabilities.during 2015 as compared to 2014. The discount rates used in estimating our embedded derivative liabilities fluctuate from year to year based on changes in the general level of interest rates. See Net income above for discussion of the impact of assumption changes for the fixed index annuity embedded derivatives in 2014.
As discussed above under Change in fair value of derivatives, the fair value of the 2015 notes embedded conversion derivative changes based upon the same factors effecting the changes in the 2015 notes hedges and, in general, the amount for the change in the fair value of the 2015 notes embedded conversion derivative was equal to the amount for the change in fair value of the 2015 notes hedges. See discussion above for explanation of the differencesdifference in these amounts for 2014 and 2013.2014. Prior to November 2014, the conversion option in the 2029 convertible notes was expected to be settled in net shares of our common stock and the conversion option in the 2029 notes was accounted for as equity. In November 2014, we issued a notice of mandatory redemption of all of the 2029 notes that were outstanding at the time the notice was issued and amended the terms of the indenture governing the 2029 notes to provide the holders with the option of receiving the conversion value of their notes entirely in cash rather than cash for the principal amount and net shares for the portion of the conversion value that exceeds the principal amount. As a result of this mandatory redemption and the change in terms, $32.1 million principal amount of the 2029 notes was converted into $69.4 million in cash and $24.6 million in shares of our common stock (897,548 shares). The amendment to the conversion terms resulted in a reclassification of the fair value of the conversion premium for the 2029 notes from equity to an embedded conversion derivative liability. The fair value of the conversion premium on the date of reclassification was $58.1 million. We applied fair value accounting to the embedded derivative liability from the date of reclassification to the dates of settlement of the conversions of the 2029 notes and recognized as expense the $3.8 million increase in the fair value of the embedded derivative liability.
Interest expense on notes and loan payable decreased 6%2% to $28.2 million in 2016 and decreased 21% to $28.8 million in 2015 from $36.4 million in 20142014. The decreases in 2016 and increased 36% to $38.9 million in 2013 from $28.5 million in 2012. The decrease in 2014 is2015 are primarily attributable to the extinguishment of $322$22 million and $138 million aggregate principal amount of our convertible senior notes in 2015 and 2014, and 2013,respectively, which was partially offset in 2016 by interest expense on the $400$100 million of 6.625% senior unsecured notes we issued in July 2013. The increase in 2013 was attributable to interest expensevariable rate term loan originated on the senior unsecured notes issued in July 2013 which was partially offset by lower interest expense on our convertible senior notes due to the extinguishment of $184 million principal amount of these notes during 2013.September 30, 2016. See Note 9 to our audited consolidated financial statements.
Interest expense on subordinated debentures was unchanged at $12.1 million in 2014 and decreased 10% to $12.1 million in 2013 from $13.5 million in 2012. The 2013 decrease was primarily due to the redemption of $22 million principal amount of our 8% Convertible Junior Subordinated Debentures in July 2012 (see Note 10 to our audited consolidated financial statements). $169.6 million principal amount of the subordinated debentures have interest based upon the three month London Interbank Offered Rate plus an applicable margin, which carried a weighted average interest rate of 4.09%, 4.07% and 4.35% for 2014, 2013 and 2012, respectively. See Financial Condition—Liabilities.
Amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs decreased 55% to $163.6 million, in 2014 and increased 122% to $365.5 million in 2013 from $164.9 million in 2012. In general, amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs has been increasing each year due to the growth in our annuity business and the deferral of policy acquisition costs incurred with respect to sales of annuity products. The increaseincreases in amortization from these factors hashave been affected by amortization associated with (1) fair value accounting for derivatives and embedded derivatives utilized in our fixed index annuity business, amortization associated with(2) net realized gains (losses) on investments and net OTTI losses recognized in operations and the amortization associated with(3) changes in litigation reserves. As discussed above, fair value accounting for derivatives and embedded derivatives utilized in our fixed index annuity business creates differences in the recognition of revenues and expenses from derivative instruments including the embedded derivative liabilities in our fixed index annuity contracts.
Amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs is summarized as follows:

Year Ended December 31,Year Ended December 31,
2014 2013 20122016 2015 2014
(Dollars in thousands)(Dollars in thousands)
Amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs before gross profit adjustments$239,369
 $215,560
 $224,773
$387,089
 $293,676
 $239,369
Gross profit adjustments:          
Fair value accounting for derivatives and embedded derivatives(74,900) 141,283
 (53,296)(11,447) (5,611) (74,900)
Net realized gains (losses) on investments, net OTTI losses recognized in operations
and changes in litigation reserves
(891) 8,625
 (6,558)(1,630) (1,951) (891)
Amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs after gross profit adjustments$163,578
 $365,468
 $164,919
$374,012
 $286,114
 $163,578

27

Table of Contents

See Net income and Operating income, (aa non-GAAP financial measure)measure, above for discussion of the impact of unlocking on amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs for the years ended December 31, 2014, 20132016, 2015 and 2012.2014. See Critical Accounting Policies—Deferred Policy Acquisition Costs and Deferred Sales Inducements.
Other operating costs and expenses decreased 11%increased 6% to $102.2 million in 2016 and increased 18% to $96.2 million in 2015 from $81.6 million in 2014 and decreased 4%are summarized as follows:
 Year Ended December 31,
 2016 2015 2014
 (Dollars in thousands)
Salary and benefits$53,479
 $48,328
 $43,018
Risk charges28,276
 21,950
 17,159
Other20,476
 25,940
 21,407
Total other operating costs and expenses$102,231
 $96,218
 $81,584
Salary and benefits expense increased in 2016 as compared to $91.92015 as a result of increase in salary and benefits of $6.6 million in 2013 from $95.5 million in 2012. The decrease in 2014 is due to a decrease inan increased number of employees related to our growth as well as an expense for guaranty fund assessments of $10.0$2.6 million related to assumption changes and the execution of an amended and restated retirement agreement with our Executive Chairman. These 2016 increases were offset by a decrease of $3.2$3.9 million related to expense recognized under our short-term incentive compensation program and other bonus programs during 2016 as compared to 2015 primarily as a result of the short-term incentive compensation program being paid out at a lower percentage of target in litigation2016 than in 2015. Salary and benefits expense (See Note 13increased in 2015 as compared to our consolidated financial statements) offset by increases in risk charges for our financing reinsurance agreement with Hannover (2013 Hannover Transaction)2014 as a result of $2.7 million and $0.9 in compensation costs. The decrease in 2013 is due to a decrease in litigation expense of $16.5 million (a $17.5 million estimated litigation liability was recorded in 2012) offset by an increase in salary and benefits of $2.9 million due to an increased number of employees related to our growth. In addition, salary and benefits expense for guaranty fund assessmentsincreased in 2015 as compared to 2014 as a result of $7.6an increase of $3.0 million related to expense recognized under our short-term incentive compensation program and other bonus programs primarily as a result of the insolvencyshort-term incentive compensation program being paid out at a higher percentage of Executive Life Insurance Companytarget in 2015 than in 2014. These 2015 increases were offset by a decrease of New York and$0.8 million related to compensation costs of $3.3 million that vary based on the Company's stock price.
The increases in reinsurance risk charges expense during 2016 and 2015 were due to the growth in our policyholder liabilities subject to a reinsurance agreement pursuant to which we cede excess regulatory reserves to an unaffiliated reinsurer. The regulatory reserves ceded at December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014 were $638.1 million, $480.7 million and $322.5 million, respectively.
Other expenses decreased in 2016 as compared to 2015 as 2016 benefited from the release of a litigation liability of $2.8 million and the release of a guaranty fund assessment liability of $2.3 million.
Other expenses increased in 2015 as compared to 2014 due to an increase in general expenses related to our growth and strong sales levels achieved in 2015. In addition, 2015 other expenses increased as compared to 2014, other operating costs and expenses, net of changesas 2014 benefited from reductions in accrued liabilities for litigation liabilities and guaranty fund assessments, were primarily affected by increases in salary and benefits and increased risk charges for the 2013 Hannover Transaction. Other operating costs and expenses excluding litigation expense and guaranty fund assessments discussed previously increased 3% to $84.8 million in 2014 from $82.4 million in 2013.
In 2013, other operating costs and expenses, netassessment accruals of changes in litigation liabilities and guaranty fund assessments, were primarily affected by increases in salaries and benefits, increased risk charges for the 2013 Hannover Transaction as well as the fluctuation in legal expense for the cost of defense of on-going litigation. Other operating costs and expenses excluding litigation expense and guaranty fund assessments discussed previously increased 7% to $82.4 million in 2013 from $77.1 million in 2012.$3.2 million.
Income tax expense decreased in 20142016 and increased in 20132015 primarily because of the changes in income before income taxes. The effective income tax rates were 35.7%36.1%, 34.9%34.8% and 32.8%35.7% for 2014, 20132016, 2015 and 2012,2014, respectively.
Income tax expense and the resulting effective tax rate are based upon two components of income before income taxes ("pretax income") that are taxed at different tax rates. Life insurance income is generally taxed at an effective rate of approximately 35.4% reflecting the absence of state income taxes for substantially all of the states that the life insurance subsidiaries do business in. The income (loss) for the parent company and other non-life insurance subsidiaries is generally taxed at an effective tax rate of 41.5% reflecting the combined federal / state income tax rates. The effective tax rates resulting from the combination of the income tax provisions for the life / non-life sources of income (loss) vary from year to year based primarily on the relative size of pretax income (loss) from the two sources. The effective income tax rate increased in 2014 and 2013,2016 because the portion of total taxable income from non-life insurance subsidiaries increased significantly, as well as tax exempt investment income decreasing significantly from the prior two years. The effective income tax rate decreased in 2015 because a portion of the 2014 parent company's loss on extinguishment of debt was not deductible resulting in an effective tax rate on the parent company's pretax loss that was less than 41.5%. The increases in the effective income tax rates were partially offset by tax favored investment income that lowered the effective income tax rate for the life subgroup.

Financial Condition
Investments
Our investment strategy is to maintain a predominantly investment grade fixed income portfolio, provide adequate liquidity to meet our cash obligations to policyholders and others and maximize current income and total investment return through active investment management. Consistent with this strategy, our investments principally consist of fixed maturity securities and mortgage loans on real estate.
Insurance statutes regulate the type of investments that our life subsidiaries are permitted to make and limit the amount of funds that may be used for any one type of investment. In light of these statutes and regulations and our business and investment strategy, we generally seek to invest in United States government and government-sponsored agency securities, corporate securities, residential and commercial mortgage backed securities, other asset backed securities and United States municipalities, states and territories securities rated investment grade by established nationally recognized statistical rating organizations ("NRSRO's") or in securities of comparable investment quality, if not rated and commercial mortgage loans on real estate.

28

Table of Contents

The composition of our investment portfolio is summarized as follows:
 December 31,
 2014 2013
 
Carrying
Amount
 Percent 
Carrying
Amount
 Percent
 (Dollars in thousands)
Fixed maturity securities:       
United States Government full faith and credit$138,460
 0.4% $42,925
 0.2%
United States Government sponsored agencies1,393,890
 3.9% 1,194,289
 3.9%
United States municipalities, states and territories3,723,309
 10.4% 3,306,743
 10.9%
Foreign government obligations193,803
 0.5% 91,557
 0.3%
Corporate securities21,566,724
 59.9% 17,309,292
 57.1%
Residential mortgage backed securities1,751,345
 4.9% 1,971,960
 6.5%
Commercial mortgage backed securities2,807,620
 7.8% 1,735,460
 5.7%
Other asset backed securities946,483
 2.6% 1,034,476
 3.4%
Total fixed maturity securities32,521,634
 90.4% 26,686,702
 88.0%
Equity securities7,805
 % 7,778
 %
Mortgage loans on real estate2,434,580
 6.8% 2,581,082
 8.5%
Derivative instruments731,113
 2.0% 856,050
 2.8%
Other investments286,726
 0.8% 215,042
 0.7%
 $35,981,858
 100.0% $30,346,654
 100.0%
During 2014 and 2013, we received $0.5 billion and $1.1 billion, respectively, in net redemption proceeds related to calls of our callable United States Government sponsored agency securities. The proceeds from these redemptions have been reinvested primarily in corporate securities, residential and commercial mortgage backed securities and United States Government sponsored agencies classified as available for sale. We remain committed to maintaining a high quality investment portfolio with low credit risk. At December 31, 2014, 33% of our fixed income securities have call features, of which 0.6% ($0.2 billion) were subject to call redemption and another 4% ($1.2 billion) will become subject to call redemption during 2015.
 December 31,
 2016 2015
 
Carrying
Amount
 Percent 
Carrying
Amount
 Percent
 (Dollars in thousands)
Fixed maturity securities:       
United States Government full faith and credit$11,805
 % $471,256
 1.2%
United States Government sponsored agencies1,344,787
 3.0% 1,398,611
 3.5%
United States municipalities, states and territories3,926,950
 8.8% 3,755,367
 9.5%
Foreign government obligations232,233
 0.5% 212,565
 0.5%
Corporate securities27,195,351
 60.8% 23,879,016
 60.3%
Residential mortgage backed securities1,254,835
 2.8% 1,462,072
 3.7%
Commercial mortgage backed securities5,365,235
 12.0% 4,174,396
 10.5%
Other asset backed securities1,806,123
 4.0% 1,145,178
 2.9%
Total fixed maturity securities41,137,319
 91.9% 36,498,461
 92.1%
Mortgage loans on real estate2,480,956
 5.5% 2,435,257
 6.2%
Derivative instruments830,519
 1.9% 337,256
 0.9%
Other investments308,774
 0.7% 299,358
 0.8%
 $44,757,568
 100.0% $39,570,332
 100.0%
Fixed Maturity Securities
Our fixed maturity security portfolio is managed to minimize risks such as interest rate changes and defaults or impairments while earning a sufficient and stable return on our investments. Historically, we have had a high percentage of our fixed maturity securities in U.S. Government sponsored agency securities (for the most part Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation and Federal National Mortgage Association). While U.S. Government sponsored agency securities are of high credit quality, we experienced several periods during the last three years where we held excess cash and other short-term investments due to lags in the reinvestment of proceeds from these securities called for redemption during those years. These calls resulted from the low interest rate and tight agency spread environment. Since 2007, when we had almost 80% of our fixed maturity portfolio invested in callable agencies, we have reallocated a significant portion of our fixed maturities from the callable agency securities to other highly rated, long-term securities. The largest portion of our fixed maturity securities are now in investment grade (NAIC designation 1 or 2) publicly traded or privately placed corporate securities.
A summary of our fixed maturity securities by NRSRO ratings is as follows:
 December 31, December 31,
 2014 2013 2016 2015
Rating Agency Rating 
Carrying
Amount
 Percent of Fixed Maturity Securities 
Carrying
Amount
 Percent of Fixed Maturity Securities 
Carrying
Amount
 Percent of Fixed Maturity Securities 
Carrying
Amount
 Percent of Fixed Maturity Securities
 (Dollars in thousands) (Dollars in thousands)
Aaa/Aa/A $20,672,331
 63.6% $16,122,487
 60.4% $26,431,700
 64.3% $23,724,648
 65.0%
Baa 10,516,834
 32.3% 9,147,584
 34.3% 13,002,964
 31.6% 11,491,609
 31.5%
Total investment grade 31,189,165
 95.9% 25,270,071
 94.7% 39,434,664
 95.9% 35,216,257
 96.5%
Ba 548,681
 1.7% 477,477
 1.8% 1,048,379
 2.5% 657,760
 1.8%
B 87,272
 0.3% 128,488
 0.5% 155,619
 0.4% 68,712
 0.2%
Caa and lower 497,477
 1.5% 617,900
 2.3%
In or near default 199,039
 0.6% 192,766
 0.7%
Caa 79,763
 0.2% 91,998
 0.3%
Ca and lower 418,894
 1.0% 463,734
 1.2%
Total below investment grade 1,332,469
 4.1% 1,416,631
 5.3% 1,702,655
 4.1% 1,282,204
 3.5%
 $32,521,634
 100.0% $26,686,702
 100.0% $41,137,319
 100.0% $36,498,461
 100.0%

29


The NAIC's Securities Valuation Office ("SVO") is responsible for the day-to-day credit quality assessment and the valuation of fixed maturity securities owned by state regulated insurance companies. The purpose of such assessment and valuation is for determining regulatory capital requirements and regulatory reporting. Insurance companies report ownership to the SVO when such securities are eligible for regulatory filings. The SVO conducts credit analysis on these securities for the purpose of assigning a NAIC designation and/or unit price. Typically, if a security has been rated by a NRSRO, the SVO utilizes that rating and assigns a NAIC designation based upon the following system:
NAIC Designation NRSRO Equivalent Rating
1 Aaa/Aa/A
2 Baa
3 Ba
4 B
5 Caa and lower
6 In or near defaultCa and lower
For most of the bonds held in our portfolio the NAIC designation matches the NRSRO equivalent rating. However, for certain loan-backed and structured securities, as defined by the NAIC, the NAIC rating is not always equivalent to the NRSRO rating presented in the previous table. The NAIC has adopted revised rating methodologies for certain loan-backed and structured securities comprised of non-agency RMBSresidential mortgage backed securities ("RMBS") and CMBS.commercial mortgage backed securities ("CMBS"). The NAIC’s objective with the revised rating methodologies for these structured securities is to increase the accuracy in assessing expected losses and use the improved assessment to determine a more appropriate capital requirement for such structured securities. The revised methodologies reduce regulatory reliance on rating agencies and allow for greater regulatory input into the assumptions used to estimate expected losses from structured securities.
The use of this process by the SVO may result in certain non-agency RMBS and CMBS being assigned a NAIC designation that is higher than the equivalent NRSRO rating. The NAIC designations for non-agency RMBS and CMBS are based on security level expected losses as modeled by an independent third party (engaged by the NAIC) and the statutory carrying value of the security, including any purchase discounts or impairment charges previously recognized. Evaluation of non-agency RMBS and CMBS held by insurers using the revised NAIC rating methodologies is performed on an annual basis.
As stated previously, our fixed maturity security portfolio is managed to minimize risks such as defaults or impairments while earning a sufficient and stable return on our investments. Our strategy has been to invest primarily in investment grade fixed maturity securities. Investment grade is NAIC 1 and 2 securities and Baa3/BBB- and better securities on the NRSRO scale. This strategy meets the objective of minimizing risk while also managing asset capital charges on a regulatory capital basis.
A summary of our fixed maturity securities by NAIC designation is as follows:
 December 31, 2014 December 31, 2013 December 31, 2016 December 31, 2015
NAIC
Designation
 
Amortized
Cost
 Fair Value 
Carrying
Amount
 
Percentage
of Total
Carrying
Amount
 
Amortized
Cost
 Fair Value 
Carrying
Amount
 
Percentage
of Total
Carrying
Amount
 
Amortized
Cost
 Fair Value 
Carrying
Amount
 
Percentage
of Total
Carrying
Amount
 
Amortized
Cost
 Fair Value 
Carrying
Amount
 
Percentage
of Total
Carrying
Amount
 (Dollars in thousands)   (Dollars in thousands)   (Dollars in thousands)   (Dollars in thousands)  
1 $19,223,151
 $20,941,634
 $20,941,634
 64.4% $16,394,654
 $16,531,250
 $16,531,250
 62.0% $25,607,268
 $26,507,798
 $26,507,798
 64.5% $23,363,259
 $24,207,801
 $24,207,801
 66.3%
2 10,432,593
 10,981,618
 10,981,618
 33.8% 9,630,251
 9,598,399
 9,598,399
 36.0% 13,037,592
 13,295,648
 13,295,648
 32.3% 11,709,730
 11,589,325
 11,589,325
 31.8%
3 602,191
 583,313
 583,907
 1.8% 502,822
 474,165
 489,579
 1.8% 1,201,059
 1,155,702
 1,163,761
 2.8% 758,531
 643,293
 654,538
 1.8%
4 22,888
 14,089
 14,089
 % 74,493
 66,078
 66,078
 0.2% 154,226
 137,188
 137,188
 0.3% 60,480
 44,312
 44,312
 0.1%
5 
 
 
 % 
 
 
 % 17,475
 24,664
 24,664
 0.1% 
 
 
 %
6 655
 386
 386
 % 1,765
 1,395
 1,396
 % 13,160
 8,260
 8,260
 % 8,332
 2,485
 2,485
 %
 $30,281,478
 $32,521,040
 $32,521,634
 100.0% $26,603,985
 $26,671,287
 $26,686,702
 100.0% $40,030,780
 $41,129,260
 $41,137,319
 100.0% $35,900,332
 $36,487,216
 $36,498,461
 100.0%
The amortized cost and fair value of fixed maturity securities at December 31, 2014,2016, by contractual maturity are presented in Note 3 to our audited consolidated financial statements in this Form 10-K, which is incorporated by reference in this Item 7.

30


Unrealized Losses
The amortized cost and fair value of fixed maturity securities and equity securities that were in an unrealized loss position were as follows:
Number of
Securities
 
Amortized
Cost
 
Unrealized
Losses
 Fair Value
Number of
Securities
 
Amortized
Cost
 
Unrealized
Losses
 Fair Value
(Dollars in thousands)(Dollars in thousands)
December 31, 2014       
December 31, 2016       
Fixed maturity securities, available for sale:              
United States Government full faith and credit1
 $513
 $(15) $498
3
 $7,693
 $(288) $7,405
United States Government sponsored agencies7
 624,272
 (13,933) 610,339
18
 1,042,461
 (46,913) 995,548
United States municipalities, states and territories17
 28,658
 (711) 27,947
113
 485,802
 (22,393) 463,409
Foreign government obligations3
 29,689
 (3,953) 25,736
4
 54,626
 (5,080) 49,546
Corporate securities:         
    
Finance, insurance and real estate40
 672,176
 (18,863) 653,313
208
 2,501,744
 (88,911) 2,412,833
Manufacturing, construction and mining138
 1,843,254
 (71,077) 1,772,177
315
 3,407,651
 (148,526) 3,259,125
Utilities and related sectors77
 736,603
 (18,338) 718,265
170
 1,871,090
 (69,263) 1,801,827
Wholesale/retail trade17
 193,605
 (5,412) 188,193
48
 469,190
 (15,172) 454,018
Services, media and other39
 418,942
 (9,706) 409,236
90
 1,036,586
 (46,901) 989,685
Residential mortgage backed securities12
 44,747
 (2,205) 42,542
25
 87,169
 (3,554) 83,615
Commercial mortgage backed securities33
 432,201
 (3,323) 428,878
407
 3,266,304
 (117,014) 3,149,290
Other asset backed securities17
 208,937
 (7,885) 201,052
112
 918,403
 (20,703) 897,700
401
 $5,233,597
 $(155,421) $5,078,176
1,513
 $15,148,719
 $(584,718) $14,564,001
Fixed maturity securities, held for investment:              
Corporate security:              
Insurance1
 $76,432
 $(594) $75,838
1
 $76,825
 $(8,059) $68,766
              
December 31, 2013       
December 31, 2015       
Fixed maturity securities, available for sale:              
United States Government full faith and credit4
 $38,029
 $(299) $37,730
United States Government sponsored agencies27
 $1,280,991
 $(121,362) $1,159,629
21
 971,462
 (14,409) 957,053
United States municipalities, states and territories151
 653,130
 (39,074) 614,056
76
 273,297
 (8,628) 264,669
Foreign government obligations6
 69,364
 (10,935) 58,429
Corporate securities:         
    
Finance, insurance and real estate124
 1,949,182
 (105,299) 1,843,883
145
 2,201,597
 (74,462) 2,127,135
Manufacturing, construction and mining249
 3,671,716
 (207,333) 3,464,383
334
 4,271,655
 (377,459) 3,894,196
Utilities and related sectors167
 2,027,723
 (114,305) 1,913,418
216
 2,499,341
 (161,505) 2,337,836
Wholesale/retail trade38
 473,275
 (27,181) 446,094
43
 537,720
 (25,988) 511,732
Services, media and other74
 1,003,852
 (61,911) 941,941
101
 1,112,071
 (43,010) 1,069,061
Residential mortgage backed securities52
 384,521
 (43,183) 341,338
34
 172,697
 (3,489) 169,208
Commercial mortgage backed securities123
 1,591,057
 (89,815) 1,501,242
222
 2,796,286
 (105,281) 2,691,005
Other asset backed securities34
 479,153
 (30,763) 448,390
43
 523,592
 (19,880) 503,712
1,046
 $13,579,623
 $(845,982) $12,733,641
1,245
 $15,467,111
 $(845,345) $14,621,766
Fixed maturity securities, held for investment:              
Corporate security:              
Insurance1
 $76,255
 $(15,415) $60,840
1
 $76,622
 $(11,245) $65,377
Unrealized losses decreased $705.4$263.8 million from $861.4$856.6 million at December 31, 20132015 to $156.0$592.8 million at December 31, 2014.2016. The decrease in unrealized losses was primarily due to a decreaseprice improvements in interestthe energy and metals & mining securities during the year ended December 31, 2016. The 10-year U.S. Treasury yield rates during 2014.at December 31, 2016 and 2015 were 2.45% and 2.27%, respectively.

31


The following table sets forth the composition by credit quality (NAIC designation) of fixed maturity securities with gross unrealized losses:
NAIC Designation 
Carrying Value of
Securities with
Gross Unrealized
Losses
 
Percent of
Total
 
Gross
Unrealized
Losses
 
Percent of
Total
 
Carrying Value of
Securities with
Gross Unrealized
Losses
 
Percent of
Total
 
Gross
Unrealized
Losses
 
Percent of
Total
 (Dollars in thousands) (Dollars in thousands)
December 31, 2014        
December 31, 2016        
1 $2,366,939
 45.9% $(44,380) 28.5% $8,754,856
 59.8% $(330,920) 55.8%
2 2,381,413
 46.2% (77,681) 49.8% 5,091,437
 34.8% (176,557) 29.8%
3 391,792
 7.6% (24,876) 15.9% 657,549
 4.5% (60,689) 10.3%
4 14,089
 0.3% (8,799) 5.6% 119,986
 0.8% (17,786) 3.0%
5 
 % 
 % 8,744
 0.1% (1,920) 0.3%
6 375
 % (279) 0.2% 8,254
 % (4,905) 0.8%
 $5,154,608
 100.0% $(156,015) 100.0% $14,640,826
 100.0% $(592,777) 100.0%
                
December 31, 2013        
December 31, 2015        
1 $7,214,149
 56.3% $(511,245) 59.3% $8,278,102
 56.3% $(280,209) 32.7%
2 5,278,699
 41.2% (306,659) 35.6% 5,813,570
 39.6% (436,543) 51.0%
3 258,516
 2.0% (34,036) 4.0% 560,199
 3.8% (117,814) 13.7%
4 57,156
 0.5% (9,068) 1.1% 44,041
 0.3% (16,168) 1.9%
5 
 % 
 % 
 % 
 %
6 1,376
 % (389) % 2,476
 % (5,856) 0.7%
 $12,809,896
 100.0% $(861,397) 100.0% $14,698,388
 100.0% $(856,590) 100.0%
Our investments' gross unrealized losses and fair value, aggregated by investment category and length of time that individual securities (consisting of 4021,514 and 1,0471,246 securities, respectively) have been in a continuous unrealized loss position at December 31, 20142016 and 2013,2015, along with a description of the factors causing the unrealized losses is presented in Note 3 to our audited consolidated financial statements in this Form 10-K, which is incorporated by reference in this Item 7.

32


The amortized cost and fair value of fixed maturity securities and equity securities in an unrealized loss position and the number of months in a continuous unrealized loss position (fixed maturity securities that carry an NRSRO rating of BBB/Baa or higher are considered investment grade) were as follows:
Number of
Securities
 
Amortized
Cost
 Fair Value 
Gross
Unrealized
Losses
Number of
Securities
 
Amortized
Cost
 Fair Value 
Gross
Unrealized
Losses
  (Dollars in thousands)  (Dollars in thousands)
December 31, 2014       
December 31, 2016       
Fixed maturity securities:              
Investment grade:              
Less than six months154
 $2,114,497
 $2,065,474
 $(49,023)1,265
 $12,767,396
 $12,374,177
 $(393,219)
Six months or more and less than twelve months6
 85,951
 82,264
 (3,687)69
 669,022
 621,784
 (47,238)
Twelve months or greater155
 2,664,255
 2,595,916
 (68,339)90
 970,424
 901,674
 (68,750)
Total investment grade315
 4,864,703
 4,743,654
 (121,049)1,424
 14,406,842
 13,897,635
 (509,207)
Below investment grade:              
Less than six months55
 153,861
 151,532
 (2,329)15
 132,087
 126,236
 (5,851)
Six months or more and less than twelve months12
 48,846
 46,956
 (1,890)10
 80,535
 72,830
 (7,705)
Twelve months or greater20
 242,619
 211,872
 (30,747)65
 606,080
 536,066
 (70,014)
Total below investment grade87
 445,326
 410,360
 (34,966)90
 818,702
 735,132
 (83,570)
402
 $5,310,029
 $5,154,014
 $(156,015)1,514
 $15,225,544
 $14,632,767
 $(592,777)
December 31, 2013       
December 31, 2015       
Fixed maturity securities              
Investment grade:              
Less than six months329
 $3,700,588
 $3,627,962
 $(72,626)588
 $7,395,125
 $7,193,059
 $(202,066)
Six months or more and less than twelve months630
 8,499,453
 7,842,391
 (657,062)484
 6,799,113
 6,388,844
 (410,268)
Twelve months or greater43
 1,102,199
 1,011,904
 (90,295)44
 592,600
 484,646
 (107,954)
Total investment grade1,002
 13,302,240
 12,482,257
 (819,983)1,116
 14,786,838
 14,066,549
 (720,288)
Below investment grade:              
Less than six months19
 101,690
 99,509
 (2,181)87
 297,879
 279,947
 (17,933)
Six months or more and less than twelve months11
 76,214
 66,136
 (10,078)15
 175,603
 148,337
 (27,266)
Twelve months or greater15
 175,734
 146,579
 (29,155)28
 283,413
 192,310
 (91,103)
Total below investment grade45
 353,638
 312,224
 (41,414)130
 756,895
 620,594
 (136,302)
1,047
 $13,655,878
 $12,794,481
 $(861,397)1,246
 $15,543,733
 $14,687,143
 $(856,590)

33


The amortized cost and fair value of fixed maturity securities (excluding United States Government and United States Government sponsored agency securities) segregated by investment grade (NRSRO rating of BBB/Baa or higher) and below investment grade and equity securities that had unrealized losses greater than 20% and the number of months in a continuous unrealized loss position were as follows:
Number of
Securities
 
Amortized
Cost
 
Fair
Value
 
Gross
Unrealized
Losses
Number of
Securities
 
Amortized
Cost
 
Fair
Value
 
Gross
Unrealized
Losses
  (Dollars in thousands)  (Dollars in thousands)
December 31, 2014       
December 31, 2016       
Investment grade:              
Less than six months
 $
 $
 $

 $
 $
 $
Six months or more and less than twelve months
 
 
 

 
 
 
Twelve months or greater
 
 
 

 
 
 
Total investment grade
 
 
 

 
 
 
Below investment grade:              
Less than six months
 
 
 
1
 19,930
 15,961
 (3,969)
Six months or more and less than twelve months3
 43,881
 28,651
 (15,230)
 
 
 
Twelve months or greater1
 655
 375
 (280)10
 85,831
 58,436
 (27,395)
Total below investment grade4
 44,536
 29,026
 (15,510)11
 105,761
 74,397
 (31,364)
4
 $44,536
 $29,026
 $(15,510)11
 $105,761
 $74,397
 $(31,364)
December 31, 2013       
December 31, 2015       
Investment grade:              
Less than six months2
 $14,516
 $11,368
 $(3,148)37
 $460,894
 $339,047
 $(121,847)
Six months or more and less than twelve months1
 4,465
 3,419
 (1,046)13
 122,794
 82,149
 (40,645)
Twelve months or greater1
 20,000
 14,513
 (5,487)1
 2,856
 1,999
 (857)
Total investment grade4
 38,981
 29,300
 (9,681)51
 586,544
 423,195
 (163,349)
Below investment grade:              
Less than six months1
 25,043
 18,813
 (6,230)13
 73,412
 44,976
 (28,436)
Six months or more and less than twelve months4
 101,244
 77,350
 (23,894)13
 145,886
 88,308
 (57,578)
Twelve months or greater2
 1,765
 1,376
 (389)3
 30,930
 14,213
 (16,717)
Total below investment grade7
 128,052
 97,539
 (30,513)29
 250,228
 147,497
 (102,731)
11
 $167,033
 $126,839
 $(40,194)80
 $836,772
 $570,692
 $(266,080)

34


The amortized cost and fair value of fixed maturity securities, by contractual maturity, that were in an unrealized loss position are shown below. Actual maturities will differ from contractual maturities because borrowers may have the right to call or prepay obligations with or without call or prepayment penalties. All of our mortgage and other asset backed securities provide for periodic payments throughout their lives, and are shown below as a separate line.
Available for sale Held for investmentAvailable for sale Held for investment
Amortized
Cost
 Fair Value 
Amortized
Cost
 Fair Value
Amortized
Cost
 Fair Value 
Amortized
Cost
 Fair Value
(Dollars in thousands)(Dollars in thousands)
December 31, 2014       
Due in one year of less$
 $
 $
 $
Due after one year through five years74,447
 73,594
 
 
Due after five years through ten years2,753,526
 2,692,393
 
 
Due after ten years through twenty years1,091,955
 1,061,437
 
 
Due after twenty years627,784
 578,280
 76,432
 75,838
4,547,712
 4,405,704
 76,432
 75,838
Residential mortgage backed securities44,747
 42,542
 
 
Commercial mortgage backed securities432,201
 428,878
 
 
Other asset backed securities208,937
 201,052
 
 
$5,233,597
 $5,078,176
 $76,432
 $75,838
December 31, 2013       
December 31, 2016       
Due in one year or less$
 $
 $
 $
$
 $
 $
 $
Due after one year through five years7,227
 7,213
 
 
177,550
 172,375
 
 
Due after five years through ten years5,328,034
 5,055,734
 
 
4,943,504
 4,806,216
 
 
Due after ten years through twenty years3,337,145
 3,086,150
 
 
2,736,298
 2,621,945
 
 
Due after twenty years2,452,486
 2,293,574
 76,255
 60,840
3,019,491
 2,832,860
 76,825
 68,766
11,124,892
 10,442,671
 76,255
 60,840
10,876,843
 10,433,396
 76,825
 68,766
Residential mortgage backed securities384,521
 341,338
 
 
87,169
 83,615
 
 
Commercial mortgage backed securities1,591,057
 1,501,242
 
 
3,266,304
 3,149,290
 
 
Other asset backed securities479,153
 448,390
 
 
918,403
 897,700
 
 
$13,579,623
 $12,733,641
 $76,255
 $60,840
$15,148,719
 $14,564,001
 $76,825
 $68,766
December 31, 2015       
Due in one year or less$
 $
 $
 $
Due after one year through five years257,994
 247,957
 
 
Due after five years through ten years6,111,139
 5,802,168
 
 
Due after ten years through twenty years2,816,752
 2,693,742
 
 
Due after twenty years2,788,651
 2,513,974
 76,622
 65,377
11,974,536
 11,257,841
 76,622
 65,377
Residential mortgage backed securities172,697
 169,208
 
 
Commercial mortgage backed securities2,796,286
 2,691,005
 
 
Other asset backed securities523,592
 503,712
 
 
$15,467,111
 $14,621,766
 $76,622
 $65,377
Energy and Metals & Mining
The tables below summarize our publicly issued corporate fixed maturity securities in the energy and metals & mining sectors. Our privately placed available for sale fixed maturity securities at December 31, 2016 total $169.6 million fair value ($172.2 million amortized cost) in Energy and $41.9 million fair value ($43.1 million amortized cost) in Metals & Mining and are not included in the following tables.
  December 31, 2016
Sector and Subsector 
Amortized
Cost
 Fair Value Unrealized Gain (Loss) Average Credit Rating
  (Dollars in thousands)  
Energy        
Independent $510,403
 $509,599
 $(804) Baa
Integrated 507,277
 520,721
 13,444
 A
Oil field services 403,265
 386,865
 (16,400) Baa
Refining 119,537
 123,131
 3,594
 Baa
Midstream 775,709
 792,578
 16,869
 Baa
Government owned no guarantee 308,684
 318,805
 10,121
 A
Metals & Mining 559,162
 574,473
 15,311
 Baa
Total Energy and Metals & Mining $3,184,037
 $3,226,172
 $42,135
 Baa

  Amortized Cost at December 31, 2016
  Energy    
NRSRO Rating Independent Integrated Oil field services Refining Midstream Government Owned No Guarantee Metals & Mining Total
  (Dollars in thousands)
Aaa $
 $
 $
 $
 $
 $
 $
 $
Aa 
 228,203
 
 
 
 19,918
 
 248,121
A 94,496
 94,732
 90,629
 12,091
 90,820
 238,946
 76,596
 698,310
Baa 369,692
 149,138
 185,217
 107,446
 656,099
 25,266
 287,800
 1,780,658
Ba 46,215
 35,204
 58,311
 
 28,790
 
 129,914
 298,434
B 
 
 60,491
 
 
 24,554
 54,051
 139,096
Below B 
 
 8,617
 
 
 
 10,801
 19,418
  $510,403
 $507,277
 $403,265
 $119,537
 $775,709
 $308,684
 $559,162
 $3,184,037
  Fair Value at December 31, 2016
  Energy    
NRSRO Rating Independent Integrated Oil field services Refining Midstream Government Owned No Guarantee Metals & Mining Total
  (Dollars in thousands)
Aaa $
 $
 $
 $
 $
 $
 $
 $
Aa 
 236,662
 
 
 
 21,002
 
 257,664
A 96,301
 96,198
 95,508
 12,612
 96,116
 252,015
 79,824
 728,574
Baa 369,032
 153,685
 181,876
 110,519
 668,128
 25,401
 295,751
 1,804,392
Ba 44,266
 34,176
 52,670
 
 28,334
 
 128,825
 288,271
B 
 
 49,745
 
 
 20,387
 50,382
 120,514
Below B 
 
 7,066
 
 
 
 19,691
 26,757
  $509,599
 $520,721
 $386,865
 $123,131
 $792,578
 $318,805
 $574,473
 $3,226,172
International Exposure
We hold fixed maturity securities with international exposure. As of December 31, 2014, 16%2016, 18% of the carrying value of our fixed maturity securities was comprised of corporate debt securities of issuers based outside of the United States and debt securities of foreign governments. All of these securities are denominated in U.S. dollars and all are investment grade (NAIC designation of either 1 or 2), except for 21 securities with a total fair value of $128.6 million which have a NAIC 3 designation. Our investment professionals analyze each holding for credit risk by economic and other factors of each country and industry. The following table presents our international exposure in our fixed maturity portfolio by country or region:
December 31, 2014December 31, 2016
Amortized
Cost
 
Carrying
Amount/
Fair Value
 
Percent of
Total
Carrying
Amount
Amortized
Cost
 Fair Value 
Percent of
Total
Fair Value
(Dollars in thousands)  (Dollars in thousands)  
GIIPS (1)$242,683
 $266,438
 0.8%$245,327
 $262,272
 0.6%
Asia/Pacific285,332
 300,275
 0.9%434,249
 443,717
 1.1%
Non-GIIPS Europe2,333,804
 2,468,885
 7.6%2,978,930
 3,043,505
 7.4%
Latin America194,215
 191,575
 0.6%261,516
 254,276
 0.6%
Non-U.S. North America971,611
 1,012,240
 3.1%1,277,542
 1,293,018
 3.2%
Australia & New Zealand390,497
 409,068
 1.3%711,576
 712,207
 1.7%
Other369,098
 409,106
 1.3%1,288,879
 1,299,827
 3.2%
$4,787,240
 $5,057,587
 15.6%$7,198,019
 $7,308,822
 17.8%
(1)Greece, Ireland, Italy, Portugal and Spain continue to cause credit risk as economic conditions in these countries continue to be volatile, especially within the financial and banking sectors. All of our exposure in GIIPS are corporate securities with issuers domiciled in these countries. None of our foreign government obligations were held in any of these countries.

All of the securities presented in the table above are denominated in U.S. dollars and all are investment grade (NAIC designation of either 1 or 2), except for the following:
35

Table of Contents
 December 31, 2016
 Amortized Cost 
Carrying Amount/
Fair Value
 (Dollars in thousands)
GIIPS (1)$28,746
 $29,267
Asia/Pacific11,499
 9,768
Non-GIIPS Europe98,302
 93,411
Latin America55,640
 44,449
Non-U.S. North America120,524
 115,832
 $314,711
 $292,727

Watch List
At each balance sheet date, we identify invested assets which have characteristics (i.e. significant unrealized losses compared to amortized cost and industry trends) creating uncertainty as to our future assessment of an other than temporary impairment. As part of this assessment we review not only a change in current price relative to its amortized cost but the issuer's current credit rating and the probability of full recovery of principal based upon the issuer's financial strength. Specifically for corporate issues we evaluate the financial stability and quality of asset coverage for the securities relative to the term to maturity for the issues we own. A security which has a 25% or greater change in market price relative to its amortized cost and a possibility of a loss of principal will be included on a list which is referred to as our watch list. We exclude from this list securities with unrealized losses which are related to market movements in interest rates and which have no factors indicating that such unrealized losses may be other than temporary as we do not intend to sell these securities and it is more likely than not we will not have to sell these securities before a recovery is realized. In addition, we exclude our RMBSresidential and commercial mortgage backed securities as we monitor all of our RMBSresidential and commercial mortgage backed securities on a quarterly basis for changes in default rates, loss severities and expected cash flows for the purpose of assessing potential other than temporary impairments and related credit losses to be recognized in operations. At December 31, 2014,2016, the amortized cost and fair value of securities on the watch list (all fixed maturity securities) are as follows:
General Description 
Number of
Securities
 
Amortized
Cost
 
Unrealized
Losses
 Fair Value 
Months in
Continuous
Unrealized
Loss Position
 
Months
Unrealized
Losses
Greater
Than 20%
    (Dollars in thousands)    
Investment grade            
Corporate fixed maturity securities:            
Finance 1 $20,000
 $(3,843) $16,157
 40 
Industrial 4 45,176
 (7,765) 37,411
 4 - 20 
  5 $65,176
 $(11,608) $53,568
    
Other asset backed securities 1 4,846
 (969) 3,877
 45 
  6 70,022
 (12,577) 57,445
    
             
Below investment grade            
Corporate fixed maturity securities:            
Industrial 4 18,839
 (8,688) 10,151
 22 2 - 4
  10 $88,861
 $(21,265) $67,596
    
General Description 
Number of
Securities
 
Amortized
Cost
 
Unrealized
Losses
 Fair Value 
Months in
Continuous
Unrealized
Loss Position
 
Months
Unrealized
Losses
Greater
Than 20%
    (Dollars in thousands)    
Below investment grade            
Corporate securities:            
Energy 6 $53,615
 $(10,278) $43,337
 18 - 44 0 - 24
Industrials 1 4,982
 (2,076) 2,906
 26 17
Materials 4 29,703
 (1,724) 27,979
 18 - 47 
Telecommunications 1 2,324
 (442) 1,882
 30 
Utilities 1 4,423
 (797) 3,626
 16 5
Other asset backed securities:            
Financials 2 6,845
 (4,244) 2,601
 43 - 69 20 - 24
Utilities 1 1,830
 
 1,830
 4 4
  16 $103,722
 $(19,561) $84,161
    
TwoWe have determined that the unrealized losses of the securities on the watch list are temporary as we do not intend to sell these securities and it is more likely than not we will not have Eurozone exposure that has contributed to sell these securities before recovery of their depressed fair values.amortized cost. Our analysis of all of thethese securities on the watch list that we have determined are temporarily impaired and their credit performance at December 31, 20142016 is as follows:
Finance:  The decline in value of this security is due to the continued wide spreads as a result of the ongoing concerns relating to capital, asset quality and earnings stability due to the financial events of the past four years and the ongoing events in the Eurozone. While this issuer has had its financial position and profitability weakened by the credit and liquidity crisis, we have determined that this security was not other than temporarily impaired due to our evaluation of the operating performance and the credit worthiness of the issuer.Corporate securities:
Industrial:Energy, Industrials and Materials: The decline in the value of these securities relates to ongoing operational issues related to the decline in certain commodity prices specific to their business.businesses. The decline in these commodity prices creates financial challenges as the industry realignsindustries realign to accommodate the lower prices. These issuers will be stressed greater than the average company due to their price sensitivity and the specific position they hold in the chain of supply. We recognized an other than temporary impairment on one security during the third quarter of 2016 due to our evaluation of the operating performance and the credit worthiness of the issuer. While thesethe remaining issuers have seen thetheir financial and profitability profile weakened, we have determined that the remaining securities were not other than temporarily impaired due to our evaluation of the operating performance and the credit worthiness of the issuer.

Telecommunications:  The decline in the value of this security is the result of regional economic recessionary pressure in Brazil and an increase in competition in the markets it operates. This issuer has seen weakened performance and heightened risk. We recognized an other than temporary impairment on this security during the first quarter of 2016 due to our evaluation of the operating performance and the credit worthiness of the issuer.
Utilities: The decline in the value of this security is due to the company's parent announcing a strategic decision to attempt to become a fully regulated utility by 2018. This issuer is part of the unregulated business of the parent and concerns have arisen about its ability to become regulated. This uncertainty has stressed market prices for this bond. Due to the company's parent announcing that it is committed to exiting the power generation business and could potentially enter the facility into bankruptcy, we recognized an other than temporary impairment on this security during the fourth quarter of 2016.
Other asset backed securities:
Financials:  The decline in value of this securityone of the asset backed securities is due to poor performance in the underlying pool of student loans. The investment is backed by a guarantee from the for-profit education services provider. We have determined that this security was not other than temporarily impaired, because the guarantee is in good standing and all required payments have been made, including hyper-amortization payments triggered by the performance of the student loan portfolio.
The decline in value of the the other asset backed security is related directly to the decline in oil prices and the financial stability of its operator. The issuer has direct exposure to the oil market as its primary business is deep water drilling. As oil prices have declined the operator of the deep water vessel has experienced financial pressure on its balance sheet. We do not intend to sell these securities and it is more likely than not we will not have to sell these securities before recovery of their amortized cost and, as such, there were norecognized other than temporary impairments on these securities at December 31, 2014.this security during the second quarter of 2016 and the third quarter of 2015.
Utilities:  The decline in the value of this security is due to the company's parent announcing a strategic decision to attempt to become a fully regulated utility by 2018.  This issuer is part of the unregulated business of the parent and concerns have arisen about its ability to become regulated.  This uncertainty has stressed market prices for this bond.  Due to the company's parent announcing that it is committed to exiting the power generation business and could potentially enter the facility into bankruptcy, we recognized an other than temporary impairment on this security during the fourth quarter of 2016.
Other Than Temporary Impairments
We have a policy and process to identify securities in our investment portfolio for which we should recognize impairments. See Critical Accounting Policies—Evaluation of Other Than Temporary Impairments. WeDuring the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014, we recognized other than temporary impairmentsimpairment on corporate securities, residential mortgage backed securities, commercial mortgage backed securities and additionalother asset backed securities, all of which are available for sale fixed maturity securities. In addition, in all periods presented we recognized credit losses on residential mortgage backed securities, and on one other asset backed security in 2016, that resulted in a numberreclassification of OTTI loss from accumulated other comprehensive income to net income.
In 2016, we recognized a $3.9 million OTTI loss in operations due to our concern regarding a corporate security issued by a Brazilian telecommunications company as developments in 2016 led us to the conclusion that we will not be able to fully recover our amortized cost basis due to liquidity concerns. A $3.0 million OTTI loss was recognized in operations due to our concern regarding a corporate security issued by a Brazilian metals and mining company as developments during 2016 led us to the conclusion that we will not be able to fully recover our amortized cost basis. We recognized a $9.2 million OTTI loss in operations on a corporate security and an other asset backed security as a result of the parent of both entities announcement that it is committed to exiting the power generation business and could potentially enter the facilities into bankruptcy. In 2016, we recognized an additional impairment of $3.5 million on an other asset backed security due to the asset supporting the cash flows being taken out of production which was first impaired during 2015. The OTTI that we recognized in 2016 on commercial mortgage backed securities were due to our intent to sell the securities, which were in an unrealized loss position at the reporting date of the period in which the decision to sell these securities was made.
In 2015, we recognized a $4.9 million OTTI loss in operations on an other asset backed security due to the asset supporting the cash flows being taken out of production. A total of $12.4 million was recognized as OTTI loss in operations on corporate securities issued by a company in iron ore production that had long standing contract issues that gave us concern as to their future cash flow and liquidity.
Several factors led us to believe that full recovery of amortized cost is not expected on the securities for which we recognized credit losses and reclassified OTTI from accumulated other comprehensive income to net income. A discussion of these factors, our policy and process to identify securities that could potentially have previously recognized OTTI. Aimpairment that is other than temporary and a summary of OTTI is presented in Note 3 to our audited consolidated financial statements in this Form 10-K, which is incorporated by reference in this Item 7.

36


Several factors led us to believe that full recovery of amortized cost will not be expected. A discussion of these factors and our policy and process to identify securities that could potentially have impairment that is other than temporary is in Note 3 to our audited consolidated financial statements in this Form 10-K, which is incorporated by reference in this Item 7.
Mortgage Loans on Real Estate
Our commercial mortgage loan portfolio consists of mortgage loans collateralized by the related properties and diversified as to property type, location and loan size. Our mortgage lending policies establish limits on the amount that can be loaned to one borrower and other criteria to attempt to reduce the risk of default. Our commercial mortgage loans on real estate are reported at cost, adjusted for amortization of premiums and accrual of discounts net of valuation allowances.loan loss allowances and deferred prepayment fees. At December 31, 20142016 and 2013,2015, the largest principal amount outstanding for any single mortgage loan was $15.8$20.9 million and $14.6$17.9 million, respectively, and the average loan size was $2.7$3.2 million and $2.5$2.9 million, at December 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively. We have the contractual ability to pursue full personal recourse on 7.4% of the loans and partial personal recourse on 21.6% of the loans. In addition, the average loan to value ratio for the overall portfolio was 53.7% and 54.3% at both December 31, 20142016 and 2013,2015, respectively, based upon the underwriting and appraisal at the time the loan was made. This loan to value is indicative of our conservative underwriting policies and practices for making commercial mortgage loans and may not be indicative of collateral values at the current reporting date. Our current practice is to only obtain market value appraisals of the underlying collateral at the inception of the loan unless we identify indicators of impairment in our ongoing analysis of the portfolio, in which case, we either calculate a value of the collateral using a capitalization method or obtain a currentthird party appraisal of the underlying collateral. The commercial mortgage loan portfolio is summarized by geographic region and property type in Note 4 of our audited consolidated financial statements of this Form 10-K, which is incorporated by reference in this Item 7.
In the normal course of business, we commit to fund commercial mortgage loans up to 90 days in advance. At December 31, 2014,2016, we had commitments to fund commercial mortgage loans totaling $61.3$75.5 million, with fixed interest rates ranging from 3.90% to 4.23%4.88%. During 20142016 and 2013,2015, due to historically low interest rates, the commercial mortgage loan industry has been very competitive. This competition has resulted in a number of borrowers refinancing with other lenders. For the year ended December 31, 2014,2016, we received $361.1$301.7 million in cash for loans being paid in full compared to $441.7$371.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2013.2015. Some of the loans being paid off have either reached their maturity or are nearing maturity; however, some borrowers are paying the prepayment fee and refinancing at a lower rate.
See Note 4 to our audited consolidated financial statements for a presentation of our specific and general loan loss allowances, impaired loans, foreclosure activity and troubled debt restructure analysis.
We have a process by which we evaluate the credit quality of each of our commercial mortgage loans. This process utilizes each loan's debt service coverage ratio as a primary metric. A summary of our portfolio by debt service coverage ratio (based on most recent information collected) follows:
December 31, 2014 December 31, 2013December 31, 2016 December 31, 2015
Principal Outstanding Percent of Total Principal Outstanding Principal Outstanding Percent of Total Principal OutstandingPrincipal Outstanding Percent of Total Principal Outstanding Principal Outstanding Percent of Total Principal Outstanding
(Dollars in thousands)   (Dollars in thousands)  (Dollars in thousands)   (Dollars in thousands)  
Debt Service Coverage Ratio:              
Greater than or equal to 1.5$1,599,817
 65.1% $1,572,241
 60.3%$1,781,928
 71.5% $1,772,226
 72.3%
Greater than or equal to 1.2 and less than 1.5537,828
 21.9% 595,786
 22.9%517,697
 20.8% 414,482
 16.9%
Greater than or equal to 1.0 and less than 1.2155,004
 6.3% 209,717
 8.0%122,115
 4.9% 141,799
 5.8%
Less than 1.0165,072
 6.7% 229,954
 8.8%68,879
 2.8% 121,402
 5.0%
$2,457,721
 100.0% $2,607,698
 100.0%$2,490,619
 100.0% $2,449,909
 100.0%
All of our mortgage loans (based on principal outstanding) that have a debt service coverage ratio of less than 1.0 are performing under the original contractual loan terms at December 31, 2016.
Mortgage loans summarized in the following table represent all loans that we are either not currently collecting or those we feel it is probable we will not collect all amounts due according to the contractual terms of the loan agreements (all loans that we have worked with the borrower to alleviate short-term cash flow issues, loans delinquent for 60 days or more at the reporting date, loans we have determined to be collateral dependent and loans that we have recorded specific impairments on that we feel may continue to have performance issues).
December 31,December 31,
2014 20132016 2015
(Dollars in thousands)(Dollars in thousands)
Impaired mortgage loans with an allowance$29,116
 $47,018
$4,640
 $21,277
Impaired mortgage loans with no related allowance2,656
 3,264
1,591
 8,859
Allowance for probable loan losses(12,333) (16,847)(1,327) (7,842)
Net carrying value of impaired mortgage loans$19,439
 $33,435
$4,904
 $22,294
At December 31, 2014,2016, we had no commercial mortgage loans that were delinquent (60 days or more past due at the reporting date) in their principal and interest payments.

37


Derivative Instruments
Our derivative instruments primarily consist of call options purchased to provide the income needed to fund the annual index credits on our fixed index annuity products. The fair value of the call options is based upon the amount of cash that would be required to settle the call options obtained from the counterparties adjusted for the nonperformance risk of the counterparty. The nonperformance risk for each counterparty is based upon its credit default swap rate. We have no performance obligations related to the call options.
We recognize all derivative instruments as assets or liabilities in the consolidated balance sheets at fair value. None of our derivatives qualify for hedge accounting, thus, any change in the fair value of the derivatives that are not classified as equity is recognized immediately in the consolidated statements of operations. A presentation of our derivative instruments along with a discussion of the business strategy involved with our derivatives is included in Note 5 to our audited consolidated financial statements in this Form 10-K, which is incorporated by reference in this Item 7.
Liabilities
Our liability for policy benefit reserves increased to $39.8$51.6 billion at December 31, 20142016 compared to $35.8$45.5 billion at December 31, 2013,2015, primarily due to additional annuity sales as discussed above. Substantially all of our annuity products have a surrender charge feature designed to reduce the risk of early withdrawal or surrender of the policies and to compensate us for our costs if policies are withdrawn early. Notwithstanding these policy features, the withdrawal rates of policyholder funds may be affected by changes in interest rates and other factors.
See Note 9 to our audited consolidated financial statements in this Form 10-K, which is incorporated by reference in this Item 7 for discussion of our notes and loan payable and borrowings under repurchase agreements.
Our subsidiary trusts have issued fixed rate and floating rate trust preferred securities and the trusts have used the proceeds from these offerings to purchase subordinated debentures from us. We also issued subordinated debentures to the trusts in exchange for all of the common securities of each trust. The sole assets of the trusts are the subordinated debentures and any interest accrued thereon. The terms of the preferred securities issued by each trust parallel the terms of the subordinated debentures. Our obligations under the subordinated debentures and related agreements provide a full and unconditional guarantee of payments due under the trust preferred securities. Accounting standards for consolidation of variable interest entities, specifically exempts qualifying special purpose entities from consolidation; therefore, we do not consolidate our subsidiary trusts and record our subordinated debt obligations to the trusts and our equity investments in the trusts. See Note 10 to our audited consolidated financial statements for additional information concerning our subordinated debentures payable to, and the preferred securities issued by, theour subsidiary trusts.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Liquidity for Insurance Operations
Our insurance subsidiaries' primary sources of cash flow are annuity deposits, investment income, and proceeds from the sale, maturity and calls of investments. The primary uses of funds are investment purchases, payments to policyholders in connection with surrenders and withdrawals, policy acquisition costs and other operating expenses.
Liquidity requirements are met primarily by funds provided from operations. Our life subsidiaries generally receive adequate cash flow from annuity deposits and investment income to meet their obligations. Annuity and life insurance liabilities are generally long-term in nature. However, a primary liquidity concern is the risk of an extraordinary level of early policyholder withdrawals. We include provisions within our annuity policies, such as surrender charges and bonus vesting, that help limit and discourage early withdrawals. At December 31, 2014,2016, approximately 95%94% of our annuity liabilities were subject to penalty upon surrender, with a weighted average remaining surrender charge period of 9.28.6 years and a weighted average surrender charge percentage of 14.7%13.8%.
Our insurance subsidiaries continue to have adequate cash flows from annuity deposits and investment income to meet their policyholder and other obligations. Net cash flows from annuity deposits and funds returned to policyholders as surrenders, withdrawals and death claims were $2.2$3.2 billion for the year ended December 31, 20142016 compared to $2.4$4.7 billion for the year ended December 31, 20132015 with the decrease primarily attributable to a $189.3$1.2 billion decrease in net annuity deposits after coinsurance and a $236.3 million (after coinsurance) increase in funds returned to policyholders offset by a $11.1 million increase in net annuity deposits after coinsurance.policyholders. We continue to invest the net proceeds from policyholder transactions and investment activities in high quality fixed maturity securities and fixed rate commercial mortgage loans.
Liquidity of Parent Company
We, as the parent company, are a legal entity separate and distinct from our subsidiaries, and have no business operations. We need liquidity primarily to service our debt including the senior(senior notes, convertible senior notesterm loan and subordinated debentures issued to subsidiary trusts,trusts), pay operating expenses and pay dividends to stockholders. Our assets consist primarily of the capital stock and surplus notes of our subsidiaries. Accordingly, our future cash flows depend upon the availability of dividends, surplus note interest payments and other statutorily permissible payments from our subsidiaries, such as payments under our investment advisory agreements and tax allocation agreement with our subsidiaries. These sources provide adequate cash flow tofor us to meet our current and reasonably foreseeable future obligations and we expect they will be adequate to fund our parent company cash flow requirements in 2015.2017.
The ability of our life insurance subsidiaries to pay dividends or distributions, including surplus note payments, will be limited by applicable laws and regulations of the states in which our life insurance subsidiaries are domiciled, which subject our life insurance subsidiaries to significant regulatory restrictions. These laws and regulations require, among other things, our insurance subsidiaries to maintain minimum solvency requirements and limit the amount of dividends these subsidiaries can pay.

38


Currently, American Equity Life may pay dividends or make other distributions without the prior approval of the Iowa Insurance Commissioner, unless such payments, together with all other such payments within the preceding twelve months, exceed the greater of (1) American Equity Life's net gain from operations for the preceding calendar year, or (2) 10% of American Equity Life's statutory capital and surplus at the preceding December 31. For 2015,2017, up to $343.3$272.7 million can be distributed as dividends by American Equity Life without prior approval of the Iowa Insurance Commissioner. In addition, dividends and surplus note payments may be made only out of statutory earned surplus, and all surplus note payments are subject to prior approval by regulatory authorities in the life subsidiary's state of domicile. American Equity Life had $1.2$1.4 billion of statutory earned surplus at December 31, 2014.2016.
The maximum distribution permitted by law or contract is not necessarily indicative of an insurer's actual ability to pay such distributions, which may be constrained by business and regulatory considerations, such as the impact of such distributions on surplus, which could affect the insurer's ratings or competitive position, the amount of premiums that can be written and the ability to pay future dividends or make other distributions. Further, state insurance laws and regulations require that the statutory surplus of our life subsidiaries following any dividend or distribution must be reasonable in relation to their outstanding liabilities and adequate for their financial needs. Along with solvency regulations, the primary driver in determining the amount of capital used for dividends is the level of capital needed to maintain desired financial strength ratings from A.M. Best. Given recent economic events that have affected the insurance industry, bothBest and Standard and Poor's. Both regulators and rating agencies could become more conservative in their methodology and criteria, including increasing capital requirements for our insurance subsidiaries which, in turn, could negatively affect the cash available to us from insurance subsidiaries. As of December 31, 2014,2016, we estimate American Equity Life has sufficient statutory capital and surplus, combined with capital available to the holding company, to meet this rating objective. However, this capital may not be sufficient if significant future losses are incurred or A.M. Besta rating agency modifies its rating criteria and access to additional capital could be limited.
The transfer of funds by American Equity Life is also restricted by a covenant in our line of credit agreement which requires American Equity Life to maintain a minimum risk-based capital ratio of 275% and a minimum level of statutory surplus equal to the sum of 1) 80% of statutory surplus at SeptemberJune 30, 2013,2016, 2) 50% of the statutory net income for each fiscal quarter ending after SeptemberJune 30, 2013,2016, and 3) 50% of all capital contributed to American Equity Life after SeptemberJune 30, 2013.2016. American Equity Life's risk-based capital ratio was 372%342% at December 31, 2014.2016. Under this agreement, we are also required to maintain a maximum ratio of adjusted debt to total adjusted capital of 0.35.
In August 2015, we completed an underwritten public offering of 9,890,000 shares of our common stock at a public offering price of $25.25 per share, of which 5,590,000 shares were subject to forward sale agreements. During the third quarter of 2015, we contributed $120 million to the capital and surplus of American Equity Life which included $104.5 million of initial net proceeds from the issuance of 4.3 million shares of common stock in our August 2015 public stock offering. We settled the forward sale agreements on August 1, 2016, and issued 5,590,000 shares of our common stock and received $134.7 million in net proceeds which was contributed to the capital and surplus of American Equity Life.
In 2015 and 2014, we retired $344 million aggregate principal amount of three convertible note issues. The total consideration paid to retire the convertible notes included $486 million of cash and 9.45 million shares of our common stock. We have now extinguished all of our convertible notes.
Cash and cash equivalents of the parent holding company at December 31, 2016, were $36.4 million. In addition, as discussed in Note 9 to our audited consolidated financial statements we have a $150 million revolving line of credit agreement. This revolving line of credit terminates on September 30, 2021, and borrowings are available for general corporate purposes of the parent company and its subsidiaries. We also have the ability to issue equity, debt or other types of securities through one or more methods of distribution under a currently effective shelf registration statement on Form S-3. The terms of any offering would be established at the time of the offering, subject to market conditions.
On August 5, 2015, Standard & Poor's raised its counterparty credit rating on American Equity Investment Life Holding Company to BBB- from BB+ and its financial strength rating on American Equity Life to A- from BBB+. On August 7, 2015, Fitch Ratings upgraded the issuer default rating of American Equity Investment Life Holding Company to BBB- from BB+.
Statutory accounting practices prescribed or permitted for our life subsidiaries differ in many respects from those governing the preparation of financial statements under GAAP. Accordingly, statutory operating results and statutory capital and surplus may differ substantially from amounts reported in the GAAP basis financial statements for comparable items. Information as to statutory capital and surplus and statutory net income for our life subsidiaries as of December 31, 20142016 and 20132015 and for the years ended December 31, 2014, 20132016, 2015 and 20122014 is included in Note 12 to our audited consolidated financial statements.
Cash and cash equivalents of the parent holding company at December 31, 2014, were $61.1 million. In addition, as discussed in Note 9 to our audited consolidated financial statements we have a $140 million revolving line of credit agreement. This revolving line of credit terminates on November 22, 2017, and borrowings are available for general corporate purposes of the parent company and its subsidiaries. We also have the ability to issue equity, debt or other types of securities through one or more methods of distribution under a currently effective shelf registration statement on Form S-3. The terms of any offering would be established at the time of the offering, subject to market conditions.
In the normal course of business, we enter into financing transactions, lease agreements, or other commitments. These commitments may obligate us to certain cash flows during future periods. The following table summarizes such obligations as of December 31, 2014.2016.
Payments Due by PeriodPayments Due by Period
Total 
Less Than
1 year
 1–3 Years 4–5 Years 
After
5 Years
Total 
Less Than
1 year
 1–3 Years 4–5 Years 
After
5 Years
(Dollars in thousands)(Dollars in thousands)
Annuity and single premium universal life products (1)$38,888,227
 $2,440,796
 $8,851,104
 $5,975,064
 $21,621,263
$51,628,372
 $2,872,877
 $11,385,699
 $7,625,528
 $29,744,268
Notes payable, including interest payments (2)595,214
 49,464
 53,000
 53,000
 439,750
Notes and loan payable, including interest payments (2)628,428
 29,537
 158,419
 440,472
 
Subordinated debentures, including interest payments (3)551,299
 11,355
 22,709
 22,709
 494,526
550,997
 12,575
 25,152
 25,152
 488,118
Operating leases18,391
 2,323
 3,191
 2,775
 10,102
16,871
 1,890
 3,813
 3,704
 7,464
Mortgage loan funding and other investments97,602
 78,210
 11,724
 7,668
 
158,248
 118,822
 25,626
 13,800
 
Total$40,150,733
 $2,582,148
 $8,941,728
 $6,061,216
 $22,565,641
$52,982,916
 $3,035,701
 $11,598,709
 $8,108,656
 $30,239,850
(1)Amounts shown in this table are projected payments through the year 20342036 which we are contractually obligated to pay to our annuity policyholders. The payments are derived from actuarial models which assume a level interest rate scenario and incorporate assumptions regarding mortality and persistency, when applicable. These assumptions are based on our historical experience.
(2)Period that principal amounts are due is determined by the earliest of the call/put date or the maturity date of each note payable.
(3)Amount shown is net of equity investments in the capital trusts due to the contractual right of offset upon repayment of the notes.

39


Inflation
Inflation does not have a significant effect on our consolidated balance sheet. We have minimal investments in property, equipment or inventories. To the extent that interest rates may change to reflect inflation or inflation expectations, there would be an effect on our balance sheet and operations. Lower interest rates experienced in 2014 have increased the value of our fixed maturity investments. It is likely that higher interest rates would have the opposite effect. It is not possible to calculate the effect such changes in interest rates, if any, have had on our operating results.
Critical Accounting Policies
The increasing complexity of the business environment and applicable authoritative accounting guidance require us to closely monitor our accounting policies. We have identified fivesix critical accounting policies that are complex and require significant judgment. The following summary of our critical accounting policies is intended to enhance your ability to assess our financial condition and results of operations and the potential volatility due to changes in estimates.
Valuation of Investments
Our fixed maturity securities (bonds and redeemable preferred stocks maturing more than one year after issuance) and equity securities classified as available for sale are reported at fair value. Unrealized gains and losses, if any, on these securities are included directly in stockholders' equity as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), net of income taxes and certain adjustments for assumed changes in amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs and deferred sales inducements. Unrealized gains and losses represent the difference between the amortized cost or cost basis and the fair value of these investments. We use significant judgment within the process used to determine fair value of these investments.
GAAP defines fair value as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability (exit price) in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. We categorize our investments into three levels of fair value hierarchy based on the priority of inputs used in determining fair value. The hierarchy defines the highest priority inputs (Level 1) as quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities. The lowest priority inputs (Level 3) are our own assumptions about what a market participant would use in determining fair value such as estimated future cash flows. In certain cases, the inputs used to measure fair value may fall into different levels of the fair value hierarchy. In such cases, a financial instrument's level within the fair value hierarchy is based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement. Our assessment of the significance of a particular input to the fair value measurement in its entirety requires judgment and considers factors specific to the financial instrument.

We categorize investments recorded at fair value in the consolidated balance sheets as follows:
Level 1 —Quoted prices are available in active markets for identical financial instruments as of the reporting date. We do not adjust the quoted price for these financial instruments, even in situations where we hold a large position and a sale could reasonably impact the quoted price.
Level 2 —Quoted prices in active markets for similar financial instruments, quoted prices for identical or similar financial instruments in markets that are not active; and models and other valuation methodologies using inputs other than quoted prices that are observable.
Level 3 —Models and other valuation methodologies using significant inputs that are unobservable for financial instruments and include situations where there is little, if any, market activity for the financial instrument. The inputs into the determination of fair value require significant management judgment or estimation. Financial instruments that are included in Level 3 are securities for which no market activity or data exists and for which we used discounted expected future cash flows with our own assumptions about what a market participant would use in determining fair value.

40


The following table presents the fair value of fixed maturity and equity securities, available for sale, by pricing source and hierarchy level as of December 31, 20142016 and 2013,2015, respectively:
Quoted Prices
in Active
Markets for
Identical Assets
(Level 1)
 
Significant
Observable
Inputs
(Level 2)
 
Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
(Level 3)
 Total
Quoted Prices
in Active
Markets for
Identical Assets
(Level 1)
 
Significant
Observable
Inputs
(Level 2)
 
Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
(Level 3)
 Total
(Dollars in thousands)(Dollars in thousands)
December 31, 2014       
December 31, 2016       
Priced via third party pricing services$4,266
 $32,204,981
 $
 $32,209,247
$5,387
 $41,016,054
 $
 $41,021,441
Priced via independent broker quotations
 38,368
 
 38,368

 36,436
 
 36,436
Priced via matrices
 
 
 

 
 
 
Priced via other methods
 205,017
 375
 205,392

 10,617
 
 10,617
$4,266
 $32,448,366
 $375
 $32,453,007
$5,387
 $41,063,107
 $
 $41,068,494
% of Total% 100.0% % 100.0%% 100.0% % 100.0%
              
December 31, 2013       
December 31, 2015       
Priced via third party pricing services$5,184
 $26,505,929
 $
 $26,511,113
$438,719
 $35,785,649
 $
 $36,224,368
Priced via independent broker quotations
 40,330
 
 40,330

 164,314
 
 164,314
Priced via matrices
 
 
 

 
 
 
Priced via other methods
 65,406
 1,376
 66,782

 40,985
 
 40,985
$5,184
 $26,611,665
 $1,376
 $26,618,225
$438,719
 $35,990,948
 $
 $36,429,667
% of Total% 100.0% % 100.0%1.2% 98.8% % 100.0%
Management's assessment of all available data when determining fair value of our investments is necessary to appropriately apply fair value accounting.
We utilize independent pricing services in estimating the fair values of investment securities. The independent pricing services incorporate a variety of observable market data in their valuation techniques, including:
reported trading prices,
benchmark yields,
broker-dealer quotes,
benchmark securities,
bids and offers,
credit ratings,
relative credit information, and
other reference data.
The independent pricing services also take into account perceived market movements and sector news, as well as a security's terms and conditions, including any features specific to that issue that may influence risk and marketability. Depending on the security, the priority of the use of observable market inputs may change as some observable market inputs may not be relevant or additional inputs may be necessary.

The independent pricing services provide quoted market prices when available. Quoted prices are not always available due to market inactivity. When quoted market prices are not available, the third parties use yield data and other factors relating to instruments or securities with similar characteristics to determine fair value for securities that are not actively traded. We generally obtain one value from our primary external pricing service. In situations where a price is not available from this service, we may obtain further quotes or prices from additional parties as needed. In addition, for our callable United States Government sponsored agencies we obtain twomultiple broker quotes and take the average of twothe broker prices received. Market indices of similar rated asset class spreads are considered for valuations and broker indications of similar securities are compared. Inputs used by the broker include market information, such as yield data and other factors relating to instruments or securities with similar characteristics. Valuations and quotes obtained from third party commercial pricing services are non-binding and do not represent quotes on which one may execute the disposition of the assets.
We validate external valuations at least quarterly through a combination of procedures that include the evaluation of methodologies used by the pricing services, analytical reviews and performance analysis of the prices against trends, and maintenance of a securities watch list. Additionally, as needed we utilize discounted cash flow models or perform independent valuations on a case-by-case basis ofusing inputs and assumptions similar to those used by the pricing services. Although we do identify differences from time to time as a result of these validation procedures, we did not make any significant adjustments as of December 31, 20142016 and 2013.2015.

41

Table of Contents

Evaluation of Other Than Temporary Impairments and Allowance for Loan Loss
The evaluation of investments for other than temporary impairments involves significant judgment and estimates by management. We review and analyze all investments on an ongoing basis for changes in market interest rates and credit deterioration. This review process includes analyzing our ability to recover the amortized cost or cost basis of each investment that has a fair value that is materially lower than its amortized cost or cost and requires a high degree of management judgment and involves uncertainty. The evaluation of securities for other than temporary impairments is a quantitative and qualitative process, which is subject to risks and uncertainties.
We have a policy and process to identify securities that could potentially have an impairment that is other than temporary. This process involves monitoring market events and other items that could impact issuers. The evaluation includes but is not limited to such factors as:
the length of time and the extent to which the fair value has been less than amortized cost or cost;
whether the issuer is current on all payments and all contractual payments have been made as agreed;
the remaining payment terms and the financial condition and near-term prospects of the issuer;
the lack of ability to refinance due to liquidity problems in the credit market;
the fair value of any underlying collateral;
the existence of any credit protection available;
our intent to sell and whether it is more likely than not we would be required to sell prior to recovery for debt securities;
our assessment in the case of equity securities including perpetual preferred stocks with credit deterioration that the security cannot recover to cost in a reasonable period of time;
our intent and ability to retain equity securities for a period of time sufficient to allow for recovery;
consideration of rating agency actions; and
changes in estimated cash flows of residential mortgage and asset backed securities.
We determine whether other than temporary impairment losses should be recognized for debt and equity securities by assessing all facts and circumstances surrounding each security. Where the decline in marketfair value of debt securities is attributable to changes in market interest rates or to factors such as market volatility, liquidity and spread widening, and we anticipate recovery of all contractual or expected cash flows, we do not consider these investments to be other than temporarily impaired because we do not intend to sell these investments and it is not more likely than not we will be required to sell these investments before a recovery of amortized cost, which may be maturity. For equity securities, we recognize an impairment charge in the period in which we do not have the intent and ability to hold the securities until recovery of cost or we determine that the security will not recover to book value within a reasonable period of time. We determine what constitutes a reasonable period of time on a security-by-security basis by considering all the evidence available to us, including the magnitude of any unrealized loss and its duration. In any event, this period does not exceed 18 months from the date of impairment for perpetual preferred securities for which there is evidence of deterioration in credit of the issuer and common equity securities. For perpetual preferred securities absent evidence of a deterioration in credit of the issuer we apply an impairment model, including an anticipated recovery period, similar to a debt security.
Other than temporary impairment losses on equity securities are recognized in operations. If we intend to sell a debt security or if it is more likely than not that we will be required to sell a debt security before recovery of its amortized cost basis, other than temporary impairment has occurred and the difference between amortized cost and fair value will be recognized as a loss in operations.
If we do not intend to sell and it is not more likely than not we will be required to sell the debt security but also do not expect to recover the entire amortized cost basis of the security, an impairment loss would be recognized in operations in the amount of the expected credit loss. We determine the amount of expected credit loss by calculating the present value of the cash flows expected to be collected discounted at each security's acquisition yield based on our consideration of whether the security was of high credit quality at the time of acquisition. The difference between the present value of expected future cash flows and the amortized cost basis of the security is the amount of credit loss recognized in operations. The remaining amount of the other than temporary impairment is recognized in other comprehensive income.

The determination of the credit loss component of a residential mortgage backed security is based on a number of factors. The primary consideration in this evaluation process is the issuer's ability to meet current and future interest and principal payments as contractually stated at time of purchase. Our review of these securities includes an analysis of the cash flow modeling under various default scenarios considering independent third party benchmarks, the seniority of the specific tranche within the structure of the security, the composition of the collateral and the actual default, loss severity and prepayment experience exhibited. With the input of third party assumptions for default projections, loss severity and prepayment expectations, we evaluate the cash flow projections to determine whether the security is performing in accordance with its contractual obligation.
We utilize the models from a leading structured product software specialist serving institutional investors. These models incorporate each security's seniority and cash flow structure. In circumstances where the analysis implies a potential for principal loss at some point in the future, we use our "best estimate" cash flow projection discounted at the security's effective yield at acquisition to determine the amount of our potential credit loss associated with this security. The discounted expected future cash flows equates to our expected recovery value. Any shortfall of the expected recovery when compared to the amortized cost of the security will be recorded as the credit loss component of thean other than temporary impairment.

42

Table of Contents

The cash flow modeling is performed on a security-by-security basis and incorporates actual cash flows on the residential mortgage backed securities through the current period, as well as the projection of remaining cash flows using a number of assumptions including default rates, prepayment rates and loss severity rates. The default curves we use are tailored to the Prime or Alt-A residential mortgage backed securities that we own, which assume lower default rates and loss severity for Prime securities versus Alt-A securities. These default curves are scaled higher or lower depending on factors such as current underlying mortgage loan performance, rating agency loss projections, loan to value ratios, geographic diversity, as well as other appropriate considerations.
The determination of the credit loss component of a corporate bond (including redeemable preferred stocks) is based on the underlying financial performance of the issuer and their ability to meet their contractual obligations. Considerations in our evaluation include, but are not limited to, credit rating changes, financial statement and ratio analysis, changes in management, largesignificant changes in credit spreads, breaches of financial covenants and a review of the economic outlook for the industry and markets in which they trade. In circumstances where an issuer appears unlikely to meet its future obligation, or the security's price decline is deemed other than temporary, an estimate of credit loss is determined. Credit loss is calculated using default probabilities as derived from the credit default swaps markets in conjunction with recovery rates derived from independent third party analysis or a best estimate of credit loss. This credit loss rate is then incorporated into a present value calculation based on an expected principal loss in the future discounted at the yield at the date of purchase and compared to amortized cost to determine the amount of credit loss associated with the security.
In addition, for debt securities which we do not intend to sell and it is not more likely than not we will be required to sell, but our intent changes due to changes or events that could not have been reasonably anticipated, an other than temporary impairment charge is recognized.recognized in net income and amortized cost is written down to fair value. Once an impairment charge has been recorded, we then continue to review the other than temporarily impaired securities for appropriate valuation on an ongoing basis. Unrealized losses may be recognized in future periods through a charge to earnings should we later conclude that the decline in fair value below amortized cost is other than temporary pursuant to our accounting policy described above. The use of different methodologies and assumptions to determine the fair value of investments and the timing and amount of impairments may have a material effect on the amounts presented in our audited consolidated financial statements.
We evaluate our mortgage loan portfolio for the establishment of a loan loss reserveallowance by specific identification of impaired loans and the measurement of an estimated loss for each individual loan identified. A mortgage loan is impaired when it is probable that we will be unable to collect all amounts due according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement. If we determine that the value of any specific mortgage loan is impaired, the carrying amount of the mortgage loan will be reduced to its fair value, based upon the present value of expected future cash flows from the loan discounted at the loan's effective interest rate, or the fair value of the underlying collateral less estimated costs to sell.
In addition, we analyze the mortgage loan portfolio for the need of a general loan allowance for probable losses on all other loans.loans on a quantitative and qualitative basis. The amount of the general loan allowance is based upon management's evaluation of the collectability of the loan portfolio, historical loss experience, delinquencies, credit concentrations, underwriting standards and national and local economic conditions.
Our commercial mortgage loan portfolio has had a populationWe rate each of mortgage loans that we have been carrying with workout terms (e.g. interest only periods, period of suspended payments, etc.) and a population of mortgage loans that have been in a delinquent status (i.e. more than 60 days past due). It is from this population that we have been recognizing some impairment loss due to nonpayment and eventual satisfaction of the loan by taking ownership of the collateral real estate. In most cases the fair value of the collateral less estimated costs to sell such collateral has been less than the outstanding principal amount of the mortgage loan.
For the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013, we utilized a process of rating the mortgage loans in our portfolio based on factors such as historical operating performance, loan to value ratio and economic outlook, among others. We calculate a loss factor to apply to each rating based on historical losses we have recognized in our mortgage loan portfolio. We apply the loss factors to the total principal outstanding within each rating category to determine an appropriate estimate of the general loan loss allowance. We also assess the portfolio quantitatively and apply a loss rate to all loans without a specific allowance at the reporting date.based on management's assessment of economic conditions, and we apply an additional amount of loss allowance to a group of loans that we have identified as having higher risk of loss.
Policy Liabilities for Fixed Index Annuities
We offer a variety of fixed index annuities with crediting strategies linked to the S&P 500 Index and other equity and bond market indices. We purchase call options on the applicable indices as an investment to provide the income needed to fund the annual index credits on the index products. See Financial Condition—Derivative Instruments. Certain derivative instruments embedded in the fixed index annuity contracts are recognized in the consolidated balance sheet at their fair values and changes in fair value are recognized immediately in our consolidated statements of operations in accordance with accounting standards for derivative instruments and hedging activities.

43

Table of Contents

Accounting for derivatives prescribes that the contractual obligations for future annual index credits are treated as a "series of embedded derivatives" over the expected life of the applicable contracts. Policy liabilities for fixed index annuities are equal to the sum of the "host" (or guaranteed) component and the embedded derivative component for each fixed index annuity policy. The host value is established at inception of the contract and accreted over the policy's life at a constant rate of interest. We estimate the fair value of the embedded derivative component at each valuation date by (i) projecting policy contract values and minimum guaranteed contract values over the expected lives of the contracts and (ii) discounting the excess of the projected contract value amounts at the applicable risk free interest rates adjusted for our nonperformance risk related to those liabilities. The projections of policy contract values are based on our best estimate assumptions for future policy growth and future policy decrements. Our best estimate assumptions for future policy growth include assumptions for the expected index credits on the next policy anniversary date which are derived from the fair values of the underlying call options purchased to fund such index credits and the expected costs of annual call options we will purchase in the future to fund index credits beyond the next policy anniversary. The projections of minimum guaranteed contract values include the same best estimate assumptions for policy decrements as were used to project policy contract values. The amounts reported in the consolidated statements of operations as "Interest sensitive and index product benefits" represent amounts credited to policy liabilities pursuant to accounting by insurance companies for certain long-duration contracts which include index credits through the most recent policy anniversary. The amounts reported in the consolidated statements of operations as "Changes in fair value of embedded derivatives" equal the change in the difference between policy benefit reserves for fixed index annuities computed under the derivative accounting standard and the long-duration contracts accounting standard at each balance sheet date.
In general, the change in the fair value of the embedded derivatives will not correspond to the change in fair value of the purchased call options because the purchased call options are one year options while the options valued in the embedded derivatives represent the rights of the contract holder to receive index credits over the entire period the fixed index annuities are expected to be in force, which typically exceeds 10 years.
The most sensitive assumption in determining policy liabilities for fixed index annuities is the rates used to discount the excess projected contract values. As indicated above, the discount rate reflects our nonperformance risk. If the discount rates used to discount the excess projected contract values at December 31, 20142016 were to increase by 100 basis points, our reserves for fixed index annuities would decrease by $377.0$451.4 million recorded through operations as a decrease in the change in fair value of embedded derivatives and there would be a corresponding decrease of $225.0$276.4 million to our combined balance for deferred policy acquisition costs and deferred sales inducements recorded through operations as an increase in amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs and deferred sales inducements. A decrease by 100 basis points in the discount rate used to discount the excess projected contract values would increase our reserves for fixed index annuities by $421.9$504.5 million recorded through operations as aan increase in the change in fair value of embedded derivatives and increase our combined balance for deferred policy acquisition costs and deferred sales inducements by $244.2$299.5 million recorded through operations as a decrease in amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs and deferred sales inducements.
Liability for Lifetime Income Benefit Riders
Beginning in July 2007, substantially all of our fixed index annuity policies and many of our annual reset fixed rate deferred annuities were issued with a lifetime income benefit rider.
The liability for lifetime income benefit riders is based on estimates of the value of benefit payments expected to be paid in excess of projected policy values recognizing the excess over the expected lives of the underlying policies based on actual and expected assessments including spreads and product charges and fees. The inputs used in the calculation of the liability for lifetime income benefit riders include actual policy values, actual income account values, actual payout factors, actual roll-up rates and our best estimate assumptions for future policy growth, future policy decrements, the ages at which policyholders are expected to elect to begin to receive lifetime income benefit payments, the percentage of policyholders who elect to receive lifetime income benefit payments and the type of income benefit payments selected upon election. The assumptions are reviewed quarterly and revisions to the assumptions are made based on historical results and our best estimates of future experience. The liability for lifetime income benefit riders is included in policy benefit reserves in the consolidated balance sheets and the change in the liability is included in interest sensitive and index product benefits in the consolidated statements of operations. See Results of Operations for the Three Years Ended December 31, 2016 in this Item 7. for a discussion and presentation of the actual effects of assumption revisions.
Deferred Policy Acquisition Costs and Deferred Sales Inducements
Costs relating to the successful production of new business are not expensed when incurred but instead are capitalized as deferred policy acquisition costs or deferred sales inducements. Only costs which are expected to be recovered from future policy revenues and gross profits may be deferred.
Deferred policy acquisition costs and deferred sales inducements are subject to loss recognition testing on a quarterly basis or when an event occurs that may warrant loss recognition. Deferred policy acquisition costs consist principally of commissions and certain costs of policy issuance. Deferred sales inducements consist of premium and interest bonuses credited to policyholder account balances.

For annuity products, these costs are being amortized generally in proportion to expected gross profits from interest marginsinvestment spreads, including the cost of hedging the fixed indexed annuity obligations, and, to a lesser extent, from product charges.charges net of expected excess payments for lifetime income benefit riders, and mortality and expense margins. Current and future period gross profits/margins for fixed index annuities also include the impact of amounts recorded for the change in fair value of derivatives and the change in fair value of embedded derivatives. Current period amortization is adjusted retrospectively through an unlocking process when estimates of current or future gross profits/margins (including the impact of realized investment gains and losses) to be realized from a group of products are revised. Our estimates of future gross profits/margins are based on actuarial assumptions related to the underlying policies terms, lives of the policies, yield on investments supporting the liabilities and level of expenses necessary to maintain the polices over their entire lives. Revisions are made based on historical results and our best estimates of future experience. See Results of Operations for the Three Years Ended December 31, 20142016 in this Item 7. for a discussion and presentation of the actual effects of unlocking.
Estimated future gross profits vary based on a number of sources including investment spread margins, surrender charge income, policy persistency, policy administrative expenses and realized gains and losses on investments including credit related other than temporary impairment losses. Estimated future gross profits are most sensitive to changes in investment spread margins which are the most significant component of gross profits. If estimated gross profits for all future years on business in force at December 31, 20142016 were to increase by 10%, our combined balance for deferred policy acquisition costs and deferred sales inducements at December 31, 20142016 would increase by $141.3$182.2 million recorded through operations as a decrease to amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs and deferred sales inducements. Correspondingly, a 10% decrease in estimated gross profits for all future years would result in a $158.6$202.7 million decrease in the combined December 31, 20142016 balances recorded through operations as an increase to amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs and deferred sales inducements.

44

Table of Contents

Deferred Income Taxes
We account for income taxes using the liability method. This method provides for the tax effects of transactions reported in the audited consolidated financial statements for both taxes currently due and deferred. Deferred income taxes reflect the impact of temporary differences between the amount of assets and liabilities recognized for financial reporting purposes and such amounts recognized for tax purposes. A temporary difference is a transaction, or amount of a transaction, that is recognized currently for financial reporting purposes but will not be recognized for tax purposes until a future tax period, or is recognized currently for tax purposes but will not be recognized for financial reporting purposes until a future reporting period. Deferred income taxes are measured by applying enacted tax rates for the years in which the temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled to the amount of each temporary difference.
The realization of deferred income tax assets is primarily based upon management's estimates of future taxable income. Valuation allowances are established when management estimates, based on available information, that it is more likely than not that deferred income tax assets will not be realized. Significant judgment is required in determining whether valuation allowances should be established, as well as the amount of such allowances. When making such determination, consideration is given to, among other things, the following:
future taxable income of the necessary character exclusive of reversing temporary differences and carryforwards;
future reversals of existing taxable temporary differences;
taxable income in prior carryback years; and
tax planning strategies.
Actual realization of deferred income tax assets and liabilities may materially differ from these estimates as a result of changes in tax laws as well as unanticipated future transactions impacting related income tax balances.
The realization of deferred income tax assets related to unrealized losses on our available for sale fixed maturity securities is also based upon our intent to hold these securities for a period of time sufficient to allow for a recovery in fair value and not realize the unrealized loss.
New Accounting Pronouncements
See Note 1 to our audited consolidated financial statements in this Form 10-K beginning on page F-9, which is incorporated by reference in this Item 7, for new accounting pronouncement disclosures.

45

Table of Contents

Item 7A.    Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
We seek to invest our available funds in a manner that will maximize shareholder value and fund future obligations to policyholders and debtors, subject to appropriate risk considerations. We seek to meet this objective through investments that: (i) consist substantially of investment grade fixed maturity securities, (ii) have projected returns which satisfy our spread targets and (iii) have characteristics which support the underlying liabilities. Many of our products incorporate surrender charges, market interest rate adjustments or other features to encourage persistency.
We seek to maximize the total return on our available for sale investments through active investment management. Accordingly, we have determined that our available for sale portfolio of fixed maturity securities is available to be sold in response to: (i) changes in market interest rates; (ii) changes in relative values of individual securities and asset sectors; (iii) changes in prepayment risks; (iv) changes in credit quality outlook for certain securities; (v) liquidity needs; and (vi) other factors. An OTTI shall be considered to have occurred when we have an intention to sell available for sale securities in an unrealized loss position. If we do not intend to sell a debt security, we consider all available evidence to make an assessment of whether it is more likely than not that we will be required to sell the security before the recovery of its amortized cost basis. If it is more likely than not that we will be required to sell the security before recovery of its amortized cost basis, an OTTI will be considered to have occurred.

Interest rate risk is our primary market risk exposure. Substantial and sustained increases and decreases in market interest rates can affect the profitability of our products, the fair value of our investments and the amount of interest we pay on our floating rate term loan and subordinated debentures. See Note 9 to our consolidated financial statements, which is incorporated by reference to this Item 7A, for information regarding the floating interest rate on our term loan. Our floating rate trust preferred securities bear interest at the three month LIBOR plus 3.50% - 4.00%. Our outstanding balance of floating rate trust preferred securities was $164.5 million at December 31, 2014,2016, of which $85.5 million has been swapped to a fixed rate which began in March of 2014 and $79.0 million has been capped for a term of seven years which began in July 2014 (See Note 5 to our audited consolidated financial statements in this Form 10-K). The profitability of most of our products depends on the spreads between interest yield on investments and rates credited on insurance liabilities. We have the ability to adjust crediting rates (caps, participation rates or asset fee rates for fixed index annuities) on substantially all of our annuity liabilities at least annually (subject to minimum guaranteed values). In addition, substantially all of our annuity products have surrender and withdrawal penalty provisions designed to encourage persistency and to help ensure targeted spreads are earned. However, competitive factors, including the impact of the level of surrenders and withdrawals, may limit our ability to adjust or maintain crediting rates at levels necessary to avoid narrowing of spreads under certain market conditions.
A major component of our interest rate risk management program is structuring the investment portfolio with cash flow characteristics consistent with the cash flow characteristics of our insurance liabilities. We use computer models to simulate cash flows expected from our existing business under various interest rate scenarios. These simulations enable us to measure the potential gain or loss in fair value of our interest rate-sensitive financial instruments, to evaluate the adequacy of expected cash flows from our assets to meet the expected cash requirements of our liabilities and to determine if it is necessary to lengthen or shorten the average life and duration of our investment portfolio. The "duration" of a security is the time weighted present value of the security's expected cash flows and is used to measure a security's sensitivity to changes in interest rates. When the durations of assets and liabilities are similar, exposure to interest rate risk is minimized because a change in value of assets should be largely offset by a change in the value of liabilities.
If interest rates were to increase 10% (28(31 basis points) from levels at December 31, 2014,2016, we estimate that the fair value of our fixed maturity securities would decrease by approximately $787.2 million.$1.0 billion. The impact on stockholders' equity of such decrease (net of income taxes and certain adjustments for changes in amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs and deferred sales inducements) would be a decrease of $249.9$291.7 million in accumulated other comprehensive income and a decrease in stockholders' equity. The computer models used to estimate the impact of a 10% change in market interest rates incorporate numerous assumptions, require significant estimates and assume an immediate and parallel change in interest rates without any management of the investment portfolio in reaction to such change. Consequently, potential changes in value of our financial instruments indicated by the simulations will likely be different from the actual changes experienced under given interest rate scenarios, and the differences may be material. Because we actively manage our investments and liabilities, our net exposure to interest rates can vary over time. However, any such decreases in the fair value of our fixed maturity securities (unless related to credit concerns of the issuer requiring recognition of an other than temporary impairment) would generally be realized only if we were required to sell such securities at losses prior to their maturity to meet our liquidity needs, which we manage using the surrender and withdrawal provisions of our annuity contracts and through other means. See Financial Condition—Liquidity for Insurance Operations for a further discussion of the liquidity risk.
At December 31, 2014, 33%2016, 35% of our fixed income securities have call features, of which 0.6%0.1% ($0.2 billion)55.7 million) were subject to call redemption. Another 4%3.1% ($1.21.3 billion) will become subject to call redemption during 2015.2017. Approximately 70% of our fixed income securities that have call features are not callable until within six months of their stated maturities. During the years ended December 31, 20142016 and 2013,2015, we received $0.8$1.2 billion and $1.1$0.7 billion, respectively, in net redemption proceeds related to the exercise of such call options. We have reinvestment risk related to these redemptions to the extent we cannot reinvest the net proceeds in assets with credit quality and yield characteristics similar to the redeemed bonds. Such reinvestment risk typically occurs in a declining rate environment. Should rates decline to levels which tighten the spread between our average portfolio yield and average cost of interest credited on annuity liabilities, we have the ability to reduce crediting rates (caps, participation rates or asset fees for index annuities) on most of our annuity liabilities to maintain the spread at our targeted level. At December 31, 2014,2016, approximately 99%98% of our annuity liabilities were subject to annual adjustment of the applicable crediting rates at our discretion, limited by minimum guaranteed crediting rates specified in the policies.

46

Table of Contents

We purchase call options on the applicable indices to fund the annual index credits on our fixed index annuities. These options are primarily one-year instruments purchased to match the funding requirements of the underlying policies. Fair value changes associated with those investments are substantially offset by an increase or decrease in the amounts added to policyholder account balances for fixed index products. For the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012, the annual index credits to policyholders on their anniversaries were $1,096.5 million, $908.7 million and $447.4 million, respectively. Proceeds received at expiration or gains recognized upon early termination of these options related to such credits were $1,103.7 million, $910.4 million and $447.2 million for the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012, respectively. The difference between proceeds received at expiration or gains recognized upon early termination of these options and index credits, as shown in the following table, is primarily due to credits attributable to minimum guaranteed interest self funded by us and over or under hedgingover-hedging as a result of policyholder behavior being different than our expectations.
Within our hedging process we purchase options out of the money to the extent of anticipated minimum guaranteed interest on index policies.
 Year Ended December 31,
 2016 2015 2014
 (Dollars in thousands)
Annual index credits to policyholders on their anniversaries$267,995
 $587,705
 $1,096,504
Proceeds received at expiration of options related to such credits272,277
 602,436
 1,103,710
On the anniversary dates of the index policies, we purchase new one-year call options to fund the next annual index credits. The risk associated with these prospective purchases is the uncertainty of the cost, which will determine whether we are able to earn our spread on our index business. We manage this risk through the terms of our fixed index annuities, which permit us to change caps, participation rates and asset fees, subject to contractual features. By modifying caps, participation rates or asset fees, we can limit option costs to budgeted amounts, except in cases where the contractual features would prevent further modifications. Based upon actuarial testing which we conduct as a part of the design of our index products and on an ongoing basis, we believe the risk that contractual features would prevent us from controlling option costs is not material.

Item 8.    Consolidated Financial Statements and Supplementary Data
The audited consolidated financial statements are included as a part of this report on Form 10-K on pages F-1 through F-57.F-54.

Item 9.    Changes in and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure
None.

Item 9A.    Controls and Procedures
(a)Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures.
In accordance with the Securities Exchange Act Rules 13a-1513a-15(e) and 15d-15,15d-15(e), our management, under the supervision of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K. Based on that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of December 31, 2014 in recording, processing, summarizing and reporting, on a timely basis, information required to be disclosed by the Company in the reports the Company files or submits under the Exchange Act.2016.
(b)Management's Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting.
The management of the Company is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting, as defined in the Exchange Act RuleRules 13a-15(f). The Company's internal control system is designed to provide reasonable assurance to the Company's management and the board of directors regarding the preparation and fair presentation of published financial statements.15d-15(f). Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
The Company's management assessed the effectiveness of the Company's internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 20142016 based upon criteria established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework (2013) (1992) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission.Commission (COSO). Based on the assessment, management has determined that we maintained effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2014.2016.
The Company's independent registered public accounting firm, KPMG LLP, who audited the consolidated financial statements included in this annual report on Form 10-K, has issued an attestation report on the effectiveness of management's internal control over financial reporting.reporting as of December 31, 2016. This report appears on page F-2.F-2 of this annual report on Form 10-K.
(c)Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting.
ThereOther than the remediation described below, there were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the quarter ended December 31, 2014,2016, that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
(d) Remediation of the Material Weakness in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting.
A material weakness is defined as a deficiency, or a combination of deficiencies, in internal control over financial reporting, such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of a company's annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis. As previously reported, we did not have adequate controls designed and in place to ensure that we correctly implemented changes made to the calculation of lifetime income benefit reserves in the third quarter of 2015. Specifically, the design of our control relating to the review of the implementation of code changes to reflect revised assumptions and the impact of those changes (the “review control”) on the lifetime income benefit reserves was not modified given the complex nature and volume of code changes we made as part of the third quarter review. As a result, we failed to identify an immaterial after-tax calculation error. This amount was corrected in the fourth quarter of 2015 prior to issuing our consolidated financial statements. The control deficiency related to the lifetime income benefit reserves created a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement to the consolidated financial statements would not be prevented or detected on a timely basis and therefore we concluded that the deficiency represented a material weakness in the Company's internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2015.
With the oversight of our audit committee, we took corrective steps during 2016 to remediate the underlying causes of the material weakness. The corrective steps we have taken, which are intended to ensure that code changes to the lifetime income benefit reserves calculation function as intended, are:
- The “review control” over the implementation of code changes to our lifetime income benefit reserves was enhanced to ensure that all code changes are reviewed by an individual who is not responsible for the implementation of the code changes.
- The scope of the “review control” over the implementation of code changes to our lifetime income benefit reserves was expanded to include detailed testing of our lifetime income benefit reserves calculation to ensure any code changes are implemented accurately.
The enhanced “review control” as described above was implemented during the fourth quarter of 2015. During the fourth quarter of 2016 and prior to the issuance of our consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2016, we completed sufficient instances of

testing of the operating effectiveness of the enhanced “review control” and concluded that the above identified material weakness in our internal controls over financial reporting has been fully remediated.

Item 9B.    Other Information
There is no information required to be disclosed on Form 8-K for the quarter ended December 31, 20142016 which has not been previously reported.

PART III
The information required by Part III is incorporated by reference from our definitive proxy statement for our annual meeting of shareholders to be held June 4, 20151, 2017 to be filed with the Commission pursuant to Regulation 14A within 120 days after December 31, 2014.2016.

47

Table of Contents

PART IV

Item 15.    Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules
Financial Statements and Financial Statement Schedules.    See Index to Consolidated Financial Statements and Schedules on page F-1 for a list of financial statements and financial statement schedules included in this report.
All other schedules to the audited consolidated financial statements required by Article 7 of Regulation S-X are omitted because they are not applicable, not required, or because the information is included elsewhere in the audited consolidated financial statements or notes thereto.
Exhibits.    See Exhibit Index immediately preceding the Exhibits for a list of Exhibits filed with this report.

48


SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized, this 26th27th day of February 2015.2017.
 AMERICAN EQUITY INVESTMENT LIFE HOLDING COMPANY
 By: /s/ JOHN M. MATOVINA
   
John M. Matovina,
Chief Executive Officer and President
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this registration statement has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated:
Signature Title (Capacity) Date
     
/s/ JOHN M. MATOVINA 
Chief Executive Officer, President and Director
(Principal Executive Officer)
 February 26, 201527, 2017
John M. Matovina   
     
/s/ TED M. JOHNSON 
Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
(Principal Financial Officer)
 February 26, 201527, 2017
Ted M. Johnson   
     
/s/ SCOTT A. SAMUELSON 
Vice President—Controller
(Principal Accounting Officer)
 February 26, 201527, 2017
Scott A. Samuelson   
     
/s/ D.J. NOBLE Executive Chairman of the Board and Director February 26, 201527, 2017
D.J. Noble    
     
/s/ JOYCE A. CHAPMAN Director February 26, 201527, 2017
Joyce A. Chapman    
     
/s/ ALEXANDER M. CLARK Director February 26, 201527, 2017
Alexander M. Clark    
     
/s/ JAMES M. GERLACH Director February 26, 201527, 2017
James M. Gerlach    
     
/s/ ROBERT L. HOWE Director February 26, 201527, 2017
Robert L. Howe
/s/ WILLIAM R. KUNKELDirectorFebruary 27, 2017
William R. Kunkel
/s/ ALAN D. MATULADirectorFebruary 27, 2017
Alan D. Matula    
     
/s/ DAVID S. MULCAHY Director February 26, 201527, 2017
David S. Mulcahy    
     
/s/ GERARD D. NEUGENT Director February 26, 201527, 2017
Gerard D. Neugent    
     
/s/ DEBRA J. RICHARDSON Director February 26, 201527, 2017
Debra J. Richardson    
     
/s/ A.J. STRICKLAND, III Director February 26, 201527, 2017
A.J. Strickland, III    
     
/s/ HARLEY A. WHITFIELDDirectorFebruary 26, 2015
Harley A. Whitfield


49


AMERICAN EQUITY INVESTMENT LIFE HOLDING COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SCHEDULES
YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014 2013 and 2012
Report
Consolidated Financial Statements: 
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Schedules: 
Schedule IV—Reinsurance
Schedule V—Valuation and Qualifying Accounts




F-1


Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
The Board of Directors and Stockholders
American Equity Investment Life Holding Company:
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of American Equity Investment Life Holding Company and subsidiaries (the Company) as of December 31, 20142016 and 2013,2015, and the related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive income (loss), changes in stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the three‑yearthree-year period ended December 31, 2014.2016. In connection with our audits of the consolidated financial statements, we also have audited the financial statement schedules listed in the Index on page F‑1.F-1. We also have audited the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2014,2016, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework(1992) (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). The Company’s management is responsible for these consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedules, for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting, and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedules and an opinion on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement and whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audits of the consolidated financial statements included examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. Our audit of internal control over financial reporting included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audits also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinions.
A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the American Equity Investment Life Holding Company and subsidiaries as of December 31, 20142016 and 2013,2015, and the results of itstheir operations and itstheir cash flows for each of the years in the three‑yearthree-year period ended December 31, 2014,2016, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. Also in our opinion, the related financial statement schedules, when considered in relation to the basic consolidated financial statements taken as a whole, present fairly, in all material respects, the information set forth therein. Also in our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2014,2016, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework(1992) (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).
/s/ KPMG LLP
Des Moines, Iowa
February 26, 201527, 2017




AMERICAN EQUITY INVESTMENT LIFE HOLDING COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(Dollars in thousands, except share and per share data)

December 31,December 31,
2014 20132016 2015
Assets      
Investments:      
Fixed maturity securities:      
Available for sale, at fair value (amortized cost: 2014 - $30,205,046; 2013 - $26,527,730)$32,445,202
 $26,610,447
Held for investment, at amortized cost (fair value: 2014 - $75,838; 2013 - $60,840)76,432
 76,255
Equity securities, available for sale, at fair value (cost: 2014 - $7,509; 2013 - $7,503)7,805
 7,778
Available for sale, at fair value (amortized cost: 2016 - $39,953,955; 2015 - $35,823,710)$41,060,494
 $36,421,839
Held for investment, at amortized cost (fair value: 2016 - $68,766; 2015 - $65,377)76,825
 76,622
Mortgage loans on real estate2,434,580
 2,581,082
2,480,956
 2,435,257
Derivative instruments731,113
 856,050
830,519
 337,256
Other investments286,726
 215,042
308,774
 299,358
Total investments35,981,858
 30,346,654
44,757,568
 39,570,332
      
Cash and cash equivalents701,514
 897,529
791,266
 397,749
Coinsurance deposits3,044,342
 2,999,618
4,639,492
 3,187,470
Accrued investment income326,559
 301,641
397,773
 362,104
Deferred policy acquisition costs2,058,556
 2,426,652
2,905,377
 2,905,136
Deferred sales inducements1,587,257
 1,875,880
2,208,218
 2,232,148
Deferred income taxes
 301,856
168,578
 232,683
Income taxes recoverable9,252
 
11,474
 29,599
Other assets280,396
 471,669
173,726
 112,171
Total assets$43,989,734
 $39,621,499
$56,053,472
 $49,029,392
      
Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity      
Liabilities:      
Policy benefit reserves$39,802,861
 $35,789,655
$51,637,026
 $45,495,431
Other policy funds and contract claims365,819
 418,033
298,347
 324,850
Notes payable421,679
 549,958
Notes and loan payable493,755
 393,227
Subordinated debentures246,243
 246,050
241,853
 241,452
Deferred income taxes3,895
 
Income taxes payable
 10,153
Other liabilities1,009,361
 1,222,963
1,090,896
 629,897
Total liabilities41,849,858
 38,236,812
53,761,877
 47,084,857
      
Stockholders' equity:      
Preferred stock, par value $1 per share, 2,000,000 shares authorized,
2014 and 2013 - no shares issued and outstanding

 
Common stock, par value $1 per share, 200,000,000 shares authorized; issued and outstanding:
2014 - 76,062,407 shares (excluding 4,126,167 treasury shares);
2013 - 70,535,404 shares (excluding 4,876,735 treasury shares)
76,062
 70,535
Preferred stock, par value $1 per share, 2,000,000 shares authorized,
2016 and 2015 - no shares issued and outstanding

 
Common stock, par value $1 per share, 200,000,000 shares authorized; issued and outstanding:
2016 - 88,001,130 shares (excluding 2,887,082 treasury shares);
2015 - 81,354,079 shares (excluding 3,448,750 treasury shares)
88,001
 81,354
Additional paid-in capital513,218
 550,400
770,344
 630,367
Unallocated common stock held by ESOP; 2013 - 58,618 shares
 (631)
Accumulated other comprehensive income721,401
 46,196
339,966
 201,663
Retained earnings829,195
 718,187
1,093,284
 1,031,151
Total stockholders' equity2,139,876
 1,384,687
2,291,595
 1,944,535
Total liabilities and stockholders' equity$43,989,734
 $39,621,499
$56,053,472
 $49,029,392
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.


F-3


AMERICAN EQUITY INVESTMENT LIFE HOLDING COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)


Year Ended December 31,Year Ended December 31,
2014 2013 20122016 2015 2014
Revenues:          
Premiums and other considerations$32,623
 $45,347
 $76,675
$43,767
 $36,048
 $32,623
Annuity product charges118,990
 103,591
 89,006
173,579
 136,168
 118,990
Net investment income1,531,667
 1,383,927
 1,286,923
1,849,872
 1,692,192
 1,531,667
Change in fair value of derivatives504,825
 1,076,015
 221,138
164,219
 (336,146) 504,825
Net realized gains (losses) on investments, excluding other than temporary
impairment ("OTTI") losses
(4,003) 40,561
 (6,454)11,524
 10,211
 (4,003)
OTTI losses on investments:          
Total OTTI losses
 (4,964) (5,411)(21,349) (25,547) 
Portion of OTTI losses recognized from other comprehensive income(2,627) (1,270) (9,521)
Portion of OTTI losses recognized in (from) other comprehensive income(1,330) 6,011
 (2,627)
Net OTTI losses recognized in operations(2,627) (6,234) (14,932)(22,679) (19,536) (2,627)
Loss on extinguishment of debt(12,502) (32,515) 

 
 (12,502)
Total revenues2,168,973
 2,610,692
 1,652,356
2,220,282
 1,518,937
 2,168,973
          
Benefits and expenses:          
Insurance policy benefits and change in future policy benefits41,815
 53,071
 81,481
52,483
 45,458
 41,815
Interest sensitive and index product benefits1,473,700
 1,272,867
 808,479
725,472
 968,053
 1,473,700
Amortization of deferred sales inducements131,419
 253,113
 87,157
251,166
 209,390
 131,419
Change in fair value of embedded derivatives32,321
 133,968
 286,899
543,465
 (464,698) 32,321
Interest expense on notes payable36,370
 38,870
 28,479
Interest expense on notes and loan payable28,248
 28,849
 36,370
Interest expense on subordinated debentures12,122
 12,088
 13,458
12,958
 12,239
 12,122
Amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs163,578
 365,468
 164,919
374,012
 286,114
 163,578
Other operating costs and expenses81,584
 91,915
 95,495
102,231
 96,218
 81,584
Total benefits and expenses1,972,909
 2,221,360
 1,566,367
2,090,035
 1,181,623
 1,972,909
Income before income taxes196,064
 389,332
 85,989
130,247
 337,314
 196,064
Income tax expense70,041
 136,049
 28,191
47,004
 117,484
 70,041
Net income$126,023
 $253,283
 $57,798
$83,243
 $219,830
 $126,023
          
Earnings per common share$1.69
 $3.86
 $0.94
$0.98
 $2.78
 $1.69
Earnings per common share - assuming dilution$1.58
 $3.38
 $0.89
$0.97
 $2.72
 $1.58
Weighted average common shares outstanding (in thousands):          
Earnings per common share74,431
 65,544
 61,259
84,793
 78,937
 74,431
Earnings per common share - assuming dilution79,894
 75,041
 65,676
85,605
 80,961
 79,894
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

F-4

Table of Contents

AMERICAN EQUITY INVESTMENT LIFE HOLDING COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)
(Dollars in thousands)

Year Ended December 31,Year Ended December 31,
2014 2013 20122016 2015 2014
Net income$126,023
 $253,283
 57,798
$83,243
 $219,830
 $126,023
Other comprehensive income (loss):          
Change in net unrealized investment gains/losses (1)1,038,604
 (1,001,943) 358,894
207,994
 (797,374) 1,038,604
Noncredit component of OTTI losses (1)1,265
 586
 4,571
556
 (2,927) 1,265
Reclassification of unrealized investment gains/losses to net income (1)(1,092) 15,802
 (10,267)4,224
 703
 (1,092)
Other comprehensive income (loss) before income tax1,038,777
 (985,555) 353,198
212,774
 (799,598) 1,038,777
Income tax effect related to other comprehensive income (loss)(363,572) 344,944
 (123,620)(74,471) 279,860
 (363,572)
Other comprehensive income (loss)675,205
 (640,611) 229,578
138,303
 (519,738) 675,205
Comprehensive income (loss)$801,228
 $(387,328) $287,376
$221,546
 $(299,908) $801,228
(1)Net of related adjustments to amortization of deferred sales inducements and deferred policy acquisition costs.
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.



F-5

Table of Contents

AMERICAN EQUITY INVESTMENT LIFE HOLDING COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)


Common
Stock
 
Additional
Paid-in
Capital
 
Unallocated
Common
Stock Held
by ESOP
 
Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Income
 
Retained
Earnings
 
Total
Stockholders'
Equity
Common
Stock
 
Additional
Paid-in
Capital
 
Unallocated
Common
Stock Held
by ESOP
 
Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Income
 
Retained
Earnings
 
Total
Stockholders'
Equity
Balance at December 31, 2011$57,837
 $468,281
 $(3,620) $457,229
 $428,952
 $1,408,679
Net income for the year
 
 
 
 57,798
 57,798
Other comprehensive income
 
 
 229,578
 
 229,578
Conversion of $20,770 of subordinated debentures2,564
 17,027
 
 
 
 19,591
Allocation of 96,294 shares of common stock by ESOP, including excess income tax benefits
 48
 1,037
 
 
 1,085
Share-based compensation, including excess income tax benefits
 6,904
 
 
 
 6,904
Issuance of 1,349,914 shares of common stock under compensation plans, including excess income tax benefits1,350
 4,455
 
 
 
 5,805
Dividends on common stock ($0.15 per share)
 
 
 
 (9,203) (9,203)
Balance at December 31, 201261,751
 496,715
 (2,583) 686,807
 477,547
 1,720,237
Net income for the year
 
 
 
 253,283
 253,283
Other comprehensive loss
 
 
 (640,611) 
 (640,611)
Allocation of 181,181 shares of common stock by ESOP, including excess income tax benefits
 1,438
 1,952
 
 
 3,390
Share-based compensation, including excess income tax benefits
 13,624
 
 
 
 13,624
Issuance of 3,294,995 shares of common stock under compensation plans, including excess income tax benefits3,295
 29,440
 
 
 
 32,735
Extinguishment of convertible senior notes, net of tax, including 5,489,808 shares of common stock issued upon conversion5,489
 57,174
 
 
 
 62,663
Warrants reclassified to embedded derivative liability
to be settled in cash

 (47,991) 
 
 
 (47,991)
Dividends on common stock ($0.18 per share)
 
 
 
 (12,643) (12,643)
Balance at December 31, 201370,535
 550,400
 (631) 46,196
 718,187
 1,384,687
$70,535
 $550,400
 $(631) $46,196
 $718,187
 $1,384,687
Net income for the year
 
 
 
 126,023
 126,023

 
 
 
 126,023
 126,023
Other comprehensive income
 
 
 675,205
 
 675,205

 
 
 675,205
 
 675,205
Allocation of 58,618 shares of common stock by ESOP, including excess income tax benefits
 721
 631
 
 
 1,352

 721
 631
 
 
 1,352
Share-based compensation, including excess income tax benefits
 7,705
 
 
 
 7,705

 7,705
 
 
 
 7,705
Issuance of 1,567,607 shares of common stock under compensation plans, including excess income tax benefits1,568
 13,137
 
 
 
 14,705
1,568
 13,137
 
 
 
 14,705
Extinguishment of convertible senior notes, net of tax, including 3,959,396 shares of common stock issued upon conversion3,959
 (7,488) 
 
 
 (3,529)3,959
 (7,488) 
 
 
 (3,529)
Warrants reclassified to embedded derivative liability
to be settled in cash

 (51,257) 
 
 
 (51,257)
 (51,257) 
 
 
 (51,257)
Dividends on common stock ($0.20 per share)
 
 
 
 (15,015) (15,015)
 
 
 
 (15,015) (15,015)
Balance at December 31, 2014$76,062
 $513,218
 $
 $721,401
 $829,195
 $2,139,876
76,062
 513,218
 
 721,401
 829,195
 2,139,876
Net income for the year
 
 
 
 219,830
 219,830
Other comprehensive loss
 
 
 (519,738) 
 (519,738)
Share-based compensation, including excess income tax benefits
 9,976
 
 
 
 9,976
Issuance of common stock via public offering4,300
 100,179
 
 
 
 104,479
Issuance of 944,504 shares of common stock under compensation plans, including excess income tax benefits944
 7,042
 
 
 
 7,986
Issuance of 47,868 shares of common stock to settle warrants that have reached their expiration48
 (48) 
 
 
 
Dividends on common stock ($0.22 per share)
 
 
 
 (17,874) (17,874)
Balance at December 31, 201581,354
 630,367
 
 201,663
 1,031,151
 1,944,535
Net income for the year
 
 
 
 83,243
 83,243
Other comprehensive income
 
 
 138,303
 
 138,303
Share-based compensation, including excess income tax benefits
 7,218
 
 
 
 7,218
Issuance of common stock via settlement of forward sale agreements5,590
 129,072
 
 
 
 134,662
Issuance of 964,053 shares of common stock under compensation plans, including excess income tax benefits964
 3,781
 
 
 
 4,745
Issuance of 92,998 shares of common stock to settle warrants that have reached their expiration93
 (94) 
 
 
 (1)
Dividends on common stock ($0.24 per share)
 
 
 
 (21,110) (21,110)
Balance at December 31, 2016$88,001
 $770,344
 $
 $339,966
 $1,093,284
 $2,291,595
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

F-6

Table of Contents

AMERICAN EQUITY INVESTMENT LIFE HOLDING COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Dollars in thousands)

 Year Ended December 31,
 2014 2013 2012
Operating activities     
Net income$126,023
 $253,283
 $57,798
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:     
Interest sensitive and index product benefits1,473,700
 1,272,867
 808,479
Amortization of deferred sales inducements131,419
 253,113
 87,157
Annuity product charges(118,990) (103,591) (89,006)
Change in fair value of embedded derivatives32,321
 133,968
 286,899
Increase in traditional life and accident and health insurance reserves2,385
 14,997
 35,758
Policy acquisition costs deferred(426,882) (425,800) (403,411)
Amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs163,578
 365,468
 164,919
Provision for depreciation and other amortization9,490
 18,375
 18,404
Amortization of discounts and premiums on investments(14,960) 6,861
 (69,828)
Loss on extinguishment of debt12,502
 32,515
 
Realized gains/losses on investments and net OTTI losses recognized in operations6,630
 (34,327) 21,386
Change in fair value of derivatives(506,328) (1,076,015) (221,138)
Deferred income taxes (benefits)(46,504) 3,013
 (52,336)
Share-based compensation3,544
 10,476
 6,552
Change in accrued investment income(24,918) (39,808) (32,896)
Change in income taxes recoverable/payable(19,405) 5,397
 13,197
Change in other assets(2,771) 1,113
 (7,090)
Change in other policy funds and contract claims(60,931) (47,445) 55,158
Change in collateral held for derivatives27,839
 236,702
 99,242
Change in other liabilities(51,008) (11,435) 5,927
Other(8,948) (7,059) (857)
Net cash provided by operating activities707,786
 862,668
 784,314
      
Investing activities     
Sales, maturities, or repayments of investments:     
Fixed maturity securities—available for sale1,490,906
 3,456,719
 3,298,623
Fixed maturity securities—held for investment
 
 2,618,207
Equity securities—available for sale
 46,674
 13,604
Mortgage loans on real estate453,937
 539,240
 543,211
Derivative instruments1,169,874
 971,432
 483,362
Other investments23,165
 24,050
 33,601
Acquisitions of investments:     
Fixed maturity securities—available for sale(5,191,781) (7,962,150) (8,266,692)
Mortgage loans on real estate(327,654) (505,953) (386,507)
Derivative instruments(492,296) (419,345) (379,592)
Other investments(72,548) (29,015) (86,569)
Purchases of property, furniture and equipment(1,352) (948) (738)
Net cash used in investing activities(2,947,749) (3,879,296) (2,129,490)

F-7

Table of Contents
 Year Ended December 31,
 2016 2015 2014
Operating activities     
Net income$83,243
 $219,830
 $126,023
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:     
Interest sensitive and index product benefits725,472
 968,053
 1,473,700
Amortization of deferred sales inducements251,166
 209,390
 131,419
Annuity product charges(173,579) (136,168) (118,990)
Change in fair value of embedded derivatives543,465
 (464,698) 32,321
Increase in traditional life and accident and health insurance reserves12,724
 5,097
 2,385
Policy acquisition costs deferred(543,325) (657,639) (426,882)
Amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs374,012
 286,114
 163,578
Provision for depreciation and other amortization3,879
 4,610
 9,490
Amortization of discounts and premiums on investments1,070
 (8,464) (14,960)
Loss on extinguishment of debt
 
 12,502
Realized gains (losses) on investments and net OTTI losses recognized in operations11,155
 9,325
 6,630
Change in fair value of derivatives(165,727) 334,300
 (506,328)
Deferred income taxes (benefits)(10,408) 41,916
 (46,504)
Share-based compensation6,692
 7,373
 3,544
Change in accrued investment income(35,669) (35,545) (24,918)
Change in income taxes recoverable/payable18,125
 (20,027) (19,405)
Change in other assets1,812
 71
 (2,771)
Change in other policy funds and contract claims(34,411) (49,092) (60,931)
Change in collateral held for derivatives414,655
 (269,474) 27,839
Change in other liabilities(55,940) 75,794
 (51,008)
Other(14,089) (15,962) (8,948)
Net cash provided by operating activities1,414,322
 504,804
 707,786
      
Investing activities     
Sales, maturities, or repayments of investments:     
Fixed maturity securities—available for sale2,746,510
 1,612,121
 1,490,906
Mortgage loans on real estate383,763
 468,102
 453,937
Derivative instruments284,470
 640,467
 1,169,874
Other investments14,045
 16,792
 23,165
Acquisitions of investments:     
Fixed maturity securities—available for sale(6,883,895) (7,256,137) (5,191,781)
Mortgage loans on real estate(428,833) (455,286) (327,654)
Derivative instruments(602,349) (588,859) (492,296)
Other investments(11,559) (13,092) (72,548)
Purchases of property, furniture and equipment(1,197) (1,313) (1,352)
Net cash used in investing activities(4,499,045) (5,577,205) (2,947,749)

AMERICAN EQUITY INVESTMENT LIFE HOLDING COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (Continued)
(Dollars in thousands)

Year Ended December 31,Year Ended December 31,
2014 2013 20122016 2015 2014
Financing activities          
Receipts credited to annuity and single premium universal life policyholder account balances$4,160,005
 $4,160,346
 $3,782,275
$7,092,348
 $7,051,227
 $4,160,005
Coinsurance deposits109,184
 25,729
 4,885
(1,317,555) (80,777) 109,184
Return of annuity policyholder account balances(2,025,203) (1,763,913) (1,575,340)(2,535,669) (2,271,950) (2,025,203)
Financing fees incurred and deferred(100) (11,942) 
(1,456) 
 (100)
Proceeds from notes payable
 415,000
 
Repayment of notes payable(219,094) (234,154) 

 (48,152) (219,094)
Proceeds from issuance of debt100,000
 
 
Net proceeds from settlement of notes hedges and warrants16,558
 22,170
 

 25,775
 16,558
Repayment of subordinated debentures
 
 (1,141)
Acquisition of common stock
 (16) 
Excess tax benefits realized from share-based compensation plans5,184
 4,043
 481
527
 3,649
 5,184
Proceeds from issuance of common stock13,681
 31,764
 5,741
139,654
 112,481
 13,681
Change in checks in excess of cash balance(1,252) 9,212
 1,071
21,501
 (5,727) (1,252)
Dividends paid(15,015) (12,643) (9,203)(21,110) (17,874) (15,015)
Net cash provided by financing activities2,043,948
 2,645,612
 2,208,769
3,478,240
 4,768,636
 2,043,948
Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents(196,015) (371,016) 863,593
393,517
 (303,765) (196,015)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year897,529
 1,268,545
 404,952
397,749
 701,514
 897,529
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year$701,514
 $897,529
 $1,268,545
$791,266
 $397,749
 $701,514
          
Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information          
Cash paid during the year for:          
Interest expense$42,989
 $25,608
 $27,666
$39,647
 $39,118
 $42,989
Income taxes132,754
 128,225
 67,450
39,066
 91,887
 132,754
Income tax refunds received
 
 512
Non-cash operating activity:          
Deferral of sales inducements330,079
 337,787
 306,659
353,966
 486,924
 330,079
Non-cash investing activity:          
Real estate acquired in satisfaction of mortgage loans14,555
 8,217
 26,324

 
 14,555
Non-cash financing activities:     
Conversion of subordinated debentures
 
 20,770
Mortgage loan on real estate sold
 4,879
 
Non-cash financing activity:     
Common stock issued in extinguishment of debt95,993
 117,463
 

 
 95,993
Common stock issued to settle warrants that have expired93
 48
 
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.


F-8


AMERICAN EQUITY INVESTMENT LIFE HOLDING COMPANY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
1.     Significant Accounting Policies
NatureDerivative Instruments
Our derivative instruments primarily consist of call options purchased to provide the income needed to fund the annual index credits on our fixed index annuity products. The fair value of the call options is based upon the amount of cash that would be required to settle the call options obtained from the counterparties adjusted for the nonperformance risk of the counterparty. The nonperformance risk for each counterparty is based upon its credit default swap rate. We have no performance obligations related to the call options.
None of our derivatives qualify for hedge accounting, thus, any change in the fair value of the derivatives that are not classified as equity is recognized immediately in the consolidated statements of operations. A presentation of our derivative instruments along with a discussion of the business strategy involved with our derivatives is included in Note 5 to our audited consolidated financial statements in this Form 10-K, which is incorporated by reference in this Item 7.
Liabilities
Our liability for policy benefit reserves increased to $51.6 billion at December 31, 2016 compared to $45.5 billion at December 31, 2015, primarily due to additional annuity sales as discussed above. Substantially all of our annuity products have a surrender charge feature designed to reduce the risk of early withdrawal or surrender of the policies and to compensate us for our costs if policies are withdrawn early. Notwithstanding these policy features, the withdrawal rates of policyholder funds may be affected by changes in interest rates and other factors.
See Note 9 to our audited consolidated financial statements in this Form 10-K, which is incorporated by reference in this Item 7 for discussion of our notes and loan payable and borrowings under repurchase agreements.
See Note 10 to our audited consolidated financial statements for additional information concerning our subordinated debentures payable to, and the preferred securities issued by, our subsidiary trusts.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Liquidity for Insurance Operations
Our insurance subsidiaries' primary sources of cash flow are annuity deposits, investment income, and proceeds from the sale, maturity and calls of investments. The primary uses of funds are investment purchases, payments to policyholders in connection with surrenders and withdrawals, policy acquisition costs and other operating expenses.
Liquidity requirements are met primarily by funds provided from operations. Our life subsidiaries generally receive adequate cash flow from annuity deposits and investment income to meet their obligations. Annuity and life insurance liabilities are generally long-term in nature. However, a primary liquidity concern is the risk of an extraordinary level of early policyholder withdrawals. We include provisions within our annuity policies, such as surrender charges and bonus vesting, that help limit and discourage early withdrawals. At December 31, 2016, approximately 94% of our annuity liabilities were subject to penalty upon surrender, with a weighted average remaining surrender charge period of 8.6 years and a weighted average surrender charge percentage of 13.8%.
Our insurance subsidiaries continue to have adequate cash flows from annuity deposits and investment income to meet their policyholder and other obligations. Net cash flows from annuity deposits and funds returned to policyholders as surrenders, withdrawals and death claims were $3.2 billion for the year ended December 31, 2016 compared to $4.7 billion for the year ended December 31, 2015 with the decrease attributable to a $1.2 billion decrease in net annuity deposits after coinsurance and a $236.3 million (after coinsurance) increase in funds returned to policyholders. We continue to invest the net proceeds from policyholder transactions and investment activities in high quality fixed maturity securities and fixed rate commercial mortgage loans.
Liquidity of Parent Company
We, as the parent company, are a legal entity separate and distinct from our subsidiaries, and have no business operations. We need liquidity primarily to service our debt (senior notes, term loan and subordinated debentures issued to subsidiary trusts), pay operating expenses and pay dividends to stockholders. Our assets consist primarily of the capital stock and surplus notes of our subsidiaries. Accordingly, our future cash flows depend upon the availability of dividends, surplus note interest payments and other statutorily permissible payments from our subsidiaries, such as payments under our investment advisory agreements and tax allocation agreement with our subsidiaries. These sources provide adequate cash flow for us to meet our current and reasonably foreseeable future obligations and we expect they will be adequate to fund our parent company cash flow requirements in 2017.
The ability of our life insurance subsidiaries to pay dividends or distributions, including surplus note payments, will be limited by applicable laws and regulations of the states in which our life insurance subsidiaries are domiciled, which subject our life insurance subsidiaries to significant regulatory restrictions. These laws and regulations require, among other things, our insurance subsidiaries to maintain minimum solvency requirements and limit the amount of dividends these subsidiaries can pay.

Currently, American Equity Life may pay dividends or make other distributions without the prior approval of the Iowa Insurance Commissioner, unless such payments, together with all other such payments within the preceding twelve months, exceed the greater of (1) American Equity Life's net gain from operations for the preceding calendar year, or (2) 10% of American Equity Life's statutory capital and surplus at the preceding December 31. For 2017, up to $272.7 million can be distributed as dividends by American Equity Life without prior approval of the Iowa Insurance Commissioner. In addition, dividends and surplus note payments may be made only out of statutory earned surplus, and all surplus note payments are subject to prior approval by regulatory authorities in the life subsidiary's state of domicile. American Equity Life had $1.4 billion of statutory earned surplus at December 31, 2016.
The maximum distribution permitted by law or contract is not necessarily indicative of an insurer's actual ability to pay such distributions, which may be constrained by business and regulatory considerations, such as the impact of such distributions on surplus, which could affect the insurer's ratings or competitive position, the amount of premiums that can be written and the ability to pay future dividends or make other distributions. Further, state insurance laws and regulations require that the statutory surplus of our life subsidiaries following any dividend or distribution must be reasonable in relation to their outstanding liabilities and adequate for their financial needs. Along with solvency regulations, the primary driver in determining the amount of capital used for dividends is the level of capital needed to maintain desired financial strength ratings from A.M. Best and Standard and Poor's. Both regulators and rating agencies could become more conservative in their methodology and criteria, including increasing capital requirements for our insurance subsidiaries which, in turn, could negatively affect the cash available to us from insurance subsidiaries. As of December 31, 2016, we estimate American Equity Life has sufficient statutory capital and surplus, combined with capital available to the holding company, to meet this rating objective. However, this capital may not be sufficient if significant future losses are incurred or a rating agency modifies its rating criteria and access to additional capital could be limited.
The transfer of funds by American Equity Life is also restricted by a covenant in our line of credit agreement which requires American Equity Life to maintain a minimum risk-based capital ratio of 275% and a minimum level of statutory surplus equal to the sum of 1) 80% of statutory surplus at June 30, 2016, 2) 50% of the statutory net income for each fiscal quarter ending after June 30, 2016, and 3) 50% of all capital contributed to American Equity Life after June 30, 2016. American Equity Life's risk-based capital ratio was 342% at December 31, 2016. Under this agreement, we are also required to maintain a maximum ratio of adjusted debt to total adjusted capital of 0.35.
In August 2015, we completed an underwritten public offering of 9,890,000 shares of our common stock at a public offering price of $25.25 per share, of which 5,590,000 shares were subject to forward sale agreements. During the third quarter of 2015, we contributed $120 million to the capital and surplus of American Equity Life which included $104.5 million of initial net proceeds from the issuance of 4.3 million shares of common stock in our August 2015 public stock offering. We settled the forward sale agreements on August 1, 2016, and issued 5,590,000 shares of our common stock and received $134.7 million in net proceeds which was contributed to the capital and surplus of American Equity Life.
In 2015 and 2014, we retired $344 million aggregate principal amount of three convertible note issues. The total consideration paid to retire the convertible notes included $486 million of cash and 9.45 million shares of our common stock. We have now extinguished all of our convertible notes.
Cash and cash equivalents of the parent holding company at December 31, 2016, were $36.4 million. In addition, as discussed in Note 9 to our audited consolidated financial statements we have a $150 million revolving line of credit agreement. This revolving line of credit terminates on September 30, 2021, and borrowings are available for general corporate purposes of the parent company and its subsidiaries. We also have the ability to issue equity, debt or other types of securities through one or more methods of distribution under a currently effective shelf registration statement on Form S-3. The terms of any offering would be established at the time of the offering, subject to market conditions.
On August 5, 2015, Standard & Poor's raised its counterparty credit rating on American Equity Investment Life Holding Company ("we", "us", "our" or "parent company"), throughto BBB- from BB+ and its wholly-owned subsidiaries,financial strength rating on American Equity Life to A- from BBB+. On August 7, 2015, Fitch Ratings upgraded the issuer default rating of American Equity Investment Life InsuranceHolding Company ("American Equity Life"), American Equity Investment Life Insurance Companyto BBB- from BB+.
Statutory accounting practices prescribed or permitted for our life subsidiaries differ in many respects from those governing the preparation of New York ("American Equity Lifefinancial statements under GAAP. Accordingly, statutory operating results and statutory capital and surplus may differ substantially from amounts reported in the GAAP basis financial statements for comparable items. Information as to statutory capital and surplus and statutory net income for our life subsidiaries as of New York") and Eagle Life Insurance Company ("Eagle Life"), is licensed to sell insurance products in 50 states and the District of Columbia at December 31, 2014. We operate solely2016 and 2015 and for the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014 is included in Note 12 to our audited consolidated financial statements.

In the insurance business.
We primarily market fixed index and fixed rate annuities andnormal course of business, we enter into financing transactions, lease agreements, or other commitments. These commitments may obligate us to a lesser extent, life insurance. Premiums and annuity deposits (netcertain cash flows during future periods. The following table summarizes such obligations as of coinsurance) collected in 2014, 2013 and 2012, by product type were as follows:December 31, 2016.
  Year Ended December 31,
Product Type 2014 2013 2012
  (Dollars in thousands)
Fixed index annuities $3,911,109
 $3,864,990
 $3,430,436
Annual reset fixed rate annuities 56,647
 71,162
 98,190
Multi-year fixed rate annuities 21,125
 41,578
 49,915
Single premium immediate annuities (SPIA) 24,580
 52,142
 164,657
Life insurance 10,810
 10,556
 12,877
  $4,024,271
 $4,040,428
 $3,756,075
 Payments Due by Period
 Total 
Less Than
1 year
 1–3 Years 4–5 Years 
After
5 Years
 (Dollars in thousands)
Annuity and single premium universal life products (1)$51,628,372
 $2,872,877
 $11,385,699
 $7,625,528
 $29,744,268
Notes and loan payable, including interest payments (2)628,428
 29,537
 158,419
 440,472
 
Subordinated debentures, including interest payments (3)550,997
 12,575
 25,152
 25,152
 488,118
Operating leases16,871
 1,890
 3,813
 3,704
 7,464
Mortgage loan funding and other investments158,248
 118,822
 25,626
 13,800
 
Total$52,982,916
 $3,035,701
 $11,598,709
 $8,108,656
 $30,239,850
(1)Amounts shown in this table are projected payments through the year 2036 which we are contractually obligated to pay to our annuity policyholders. The payments are derived from actuarial models which assume a level interest rate scenario and incorporate assumptions regarding mortality and persistency, when applicable. These assumptions are based on our historical experience.
(2)Period that principal amounts are due is determined by the earliest of the call/put date or the maturity date of each note payable.
(3)Amount shown is net of equity investments in the capital trusts due to the contractual right of offset upon repayment of the notes.
Inflation
Agents contracted with us through two national marketing organizations which marketInflation does not have a significant effect on our products accounted for more than 10%consolidated balance sheet. We have minimal investments in property, equipment or inventories. To the extent that interest rates may change to reflect inflation or inflation expectations, there would be an effect on our balance sheet and operations. It is not possible to calculate the effect such changes in interest rates, if any, have had on our operating results.
Critical Accounting Policies
The increasing complexity of the annuity depositsbusiness environment and insurance premium collections during 2014, each representing 10% individually,applicable authoritative accounting guidance require us to closely monitor our accounting policies. We have identified six critical accounting policies that are complex and require significant judgment. The following summary of the annuity depositsour critical accounting policies is intended to enhance your ability to assess our financial condition and insurance premiums collected. Agents contracted with us through one national marketing organization accounted for more than 10%results of the annuity deposits and insurance premium collections during 2013 representing 11% of the annuity deposits and insurance premiums collected. Agents contracted with us through three national marketing organizations accounted for more than 10% of the annuity deposits and insurance premium collections during 2012 representing 12%, 11% and 10% individually, of the annuity deposits and insurance premiums collected.
Consolidation and Basis of Presentation
The consolidated financial statements include our accounts and our wholly-owned subsidiaries: American Equity Life, American Equity Life of New York, Eagle Life, AERL, L.C., American Equity Capital, Inc., American Equity Investment Properties, L.C., American Equity Advisors, Inc. and American Equity Investment Service Company. All significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated.
Estimates and Assumptions
The preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles ("GAAP") requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial statementsoperations and the reported amountspotential volatility due to changes in estimates.
Valuation of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Significant estimates and assumptions are utilized in the calculation of deferred policy acquisition costs, deferred sales inducements, policy benefit reserves, valuation of derivatives, including embedded derivatives on index annuity reserves, contingent convertible senior notes, valuation of investments, other than temporary impairment of investments, allowances for loan losses on mortgage loans and valuation allowances on deferred tax assets. A description of each critical estimate is incorporated within the discussion of the related accounting policies which follow. It is reasonably possible that actual experience could differ from the estimates and assumptions utilized.
Investments
FixedOur fixed maturity securities (bonds and redeemable preferred stocks maturing more than one year after issuance) that may be sold prior to maturity areand equity securities classified as available for sale. Available for sale securities are reported at fair value and unrealizedvalue. Unrealized gains and losses, if any, on these securities are included directly in stockholders' equity as a separate component of stockholders' equity,accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), net of income taxes and certain adjustments for assumed changes in amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs and deferred sales inducements. Fair values,Unrealized gains and losses represent the difference between the amortized cost or cost basis and the fair value of these investments. We use significant judgment within the process used to determine fair value of these investments.
GAAP defines fair value as reported herein,the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability (exit price) in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. We categorize our investments into three levels of fair value hierarchy based on the priority of inputs used in determining fair value. The hierarchy defines the highest priority inputs (Level 1) as quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities. The lowest priority inputs (Level 3) are our own assumptions about what a market participant would use in determining fair value such as estimated future cash flows. In certain cases, the inputs used to measure fair value may fall into different levels of the fair value hierarchy. In such cases, a financial instrument's level within the fair value hierarchy is based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement. Our assessment of the significance of a particular input to the fair value measurement in its entirety requires judgment and considers factors specific to the financial instrument.

We categorize investments recorded at fair value in the consolidated balance sheets as follows:
Level 1 —Quoted prices are available in active markets for identical financial instruments as of the reporting date. We do not adjust the quoted price for these financial instruments, even in situations where we hold a large position and a sale could reasonably impact the quoted price.
Level 2 —Quoted prices in active markets for similar financial instruments, quoted prices for identical or similar financial instruments in markets that are not active; and models and other valuation methodologies using inputs other than quoted prices that are observable.
Level 3 —Models and other valuation methodologies using significant inputs that are unobservable for financial instruments and include situations where there is little, if any, market activity for the financial instrument. The inputs into the determination of fair value require significant management judgment or estimation. Financial instruments that are included in Level 3 are securities for which no market activity or data exists and for which we used discounted expected future cash flows with our own assumptions about what a market participant would use in determining fair value.
The following table presents the fair value of fixed maturity and equity securities, are basedavailable for sale, by pricing source and hierarchy level as of December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively:
 
Quoted Prices
in Active
Markets for
Identical Assets
(Level 1)
 
Significant
Observable
Inputs
(Level 2)
 
Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
(Level 3)
 Total
 (Dollars in thousands)
December 31, 2016       
Priced via third party pricing services$5,387
 $41,016,054
 $
 $41,021,441
Priced via independent broker quotations
 36,436
 
 36,436
Priced via matrices
 
 
 
Priced via other methods
 10,617
 
 10,617
 $5,387
 $41,063,107
 $
 $41,068,494
% of Total% 100.0% % 100.0%
        
December 31, 2015       
Priced via third party pricing services$438,719
 $35,785,649
 $
 $36,224,368
Priced via independent broker quotations
 164,314
 
 164,314
Priced via matrices
 
 
 
Priced via other methods
 40,985
 
 40,985
 $438,719
 $35,990,948
 $
 $36,429,667
% of Total1.2% 98.8% % 100.0%
Management's assessment of all available data when determining fair value of our investments is necessary to appropriately apply fair value accounting.
We utilize independent pricing services in estimating the fair values of investment securities. The independent pricing services incorporate a variety of observable market data in their valuation techniques, including:
reported trading prices,
benchmark yields,
broker-dealer quotes,
benchmark securities,
bids and offers,
credit ratings,
relative credit information, and
other reference data.
The independent pricing services also take into account perceived market movements and sector news, as well as a security's terms and conditions, including any features specific to that issue that may influence risk and marketability. Depending on the security, the priority of the use of observable market inputs may change as some observable market inputs may not be relevant or additional inputs may be necessary.

The independent pricing services provide quoted market prices in active markets when available. Quoted prices are not always available or for those fixed maturity securitiesdue to market inactivity. When quoted market prices are not actively traded,available, the third parties use yield data and other factors relating to instruments or securities with similar characteristics to determine fair value for securities that are used. See Note 2not actively traded. We generally obtain one value from our primary external pricing service. In situations where a price is not available from this service, we may obtain further quotes or prices from additional parties as needed. In addition, for our callable United States Government sponsored agencies we obtain multiple broker quotes and take the average of the broker prices received. Market indices of similar rated asset class spreads are considered for valuations and broker indications of similar securities are compared. Inputs used by the broker include market information, such as yield data and other factors relating to instruments or securities with similar characteristics. Valuations and quotes obtained from third party commercial pricing services are non-binding and do not represent quotes on which one may execute the disposition of the assets.
We validate external valuations at least quarterly through a combination of procedures that include the evaluation of methodologies used by the pricing services, analytical reviews and performance analysis of the prices against trends, and maintenance of a securities watch list. Additionally, as needed we utilize discounted cash flow models or perform independent valuations on a case-by-case basis using inputs and assumptions similar to those used by the pricing services. Although we do identify differences from time to time as a result of these validation procedures, we did not make any significant adjustments as of December 31, 2016 and 2015.
Evaluation of Other Than Temporary Impairments and Allowance for Loan Loss
The evaluation of investments for other than temporary impairments involves significant judgment and estimates by management. We review and analyze all investments on an ongoing basis for changes in market interest rates and credit deterioration. This review process includes analyzing our ability to recover the amortized cost or cost basis of each investment that has a fair value that is materially lower than its amortized cost and requires a high degree of management judgment and involves uncertainty. The evaluation of securities for other than temporary impairments is a quantitative and qualitative process, which is subject to risks and uncertainties.
We have a policy and process to identify securities that could potentially have an impairment that is other than temporary. This process involves monitoring market events and other items that could impact issuers. The evaluation includes but is not limited to such factors as:
the length of time and the extent to which the fair value has been less than amortized cost or cost;
whether the issuer is current on all payments and all contractual payments have been made as agreed;
the remaining payment terms and the financial condition and near-term prospects of the issuer;
the lack of ability to refinance due to liquidity problems in the credit market;
the fair value of any underlying collateral;
the existence of any credit protection available;
our intent to sell and whether it is more information onlikely than not we would be required to sell prior to recovery for debt securities;
our assessment in the determinationcase of fair value. Premiums and discounts are amortized/accrued using methods which resultequity securities including perpetual preferred stocks with credit deterioration that the security cannot recover to cost in a constant yield overreasonable period of time;
our intent and ability to retain equity securities for a period of time sufficient to allow for recovery;
consideration of rating agency actions; and
changes in estimated cash flows of mortgage and asset backed securities.
We determine whether other than temporary impairment losses should be recognized for debt and equity securities by assessing all facts and circumstances surrounding each security. Where the securities'decline in fair value of debt securities is attributable to changes in market interest rates or to factors such as market volatility, liquidity and spread widening, and we anticipate recovery of all contractual or expected lives. Amortization/accrualcash flows, we do not consider these investments to be other than temporarily impaired because we do not intend to sell these investments and it is not more likely than not we will be required to sell these investments before a recovery of premiums and discounts on residential and commercial mortgage backedamortized cost, which may be maturity. For equity securities, incorporate prepayment assumptions to estimatewe recognize an impairment charge in the securities' expected lives. Interest income is recognized as earned.
Fixed maturity securities thatperiod in which we do not have the positive intent and ability to hold the securities until recovery of cost or we determine that the security will not recover to maturity are classified as held for investment. Such securities may, at times, be called priorbook value within a reasonable period of time. We determine what constitutes a reasonable period of time on a security-by-security basis by considering all the evidence available to maturity. Held for investmentus, including the magnitude of any unrealized loss and its duration.
Other than temporary impairment losses on equity securities are reportedrecognized in operations. If we intend to sell a debt security or if it is more likely than not that we will be required to sell a debt security before recovery of its amortized cost basis, other than temporary impairment has occurred and the difference between amortized cost and fair value will be recognized as a loss in operations.
If we do not intend to sell and it is not more likely than not we will be required to sell the debt security but also do not expect to recover the entire amortized cost basis of the security, an impairment loss would be recognized in operations in the amount of the expected credit loss. We determine the amount of expected credit loss by calculating the present value of the cash flows expected to be collected discounted at each security's acquisition yield based on our consideration of whether the security was of high credit quality at the time of acquisition. The difference between the present value of expected future cash flows and the amortized cost adjustedbasis of the security is the amount of credit loss recognized in operations. The remaining amount of the other than temporary impairment is recognized in other comprehensive income.

The determination of the credit loss component of a mortgage backed security is based on a number of factors. The primary consideration in this evaluation process is the issuer's ability to meet current and future interest and principal payments as contractually stated at time of purchase. Our review of these securities includes an analysis of the cash flow modeling under various default scenarios considering independent third party benchmarks, the seniority of the specific tranche within the structure of the security, the composition of the collateral and the actual default, loss severity and prepayment experience exhibited. With the input of third party assumptions for amortizationdefault projections, loss severity and prepayment expectations, we evaluate the cash flow projections to determine whether the security is performing in accordance with its contractual obligation.
We utilize the models from a leading structured product software specialist serving institutional investors. These models incorporate each security's seniority and cash flow structure. In circumstances where the analysis implies a potential for principal loss at some point in the future, we use our "best estimate" cash flow projection discounted at the security's effective yield at acquisition to determine the amount of premiumsour potential credit loss associated with this security. The discounted expected future cash flows equates to our expected recovery value. Any shortfall of the expected recovery when compared to the amortized cost of the security will be recorded as the credit loss component of an other than temporary impairment.
The cash flow modeling is performed on a security-by-security basis and discounts. Changesincorporates actual cash flows on the residential mortgage backed securities through the current period, as well as the projection of remaining cash flows using a number of assumptions including default rates, prepayment rates and loss severity rates. The default curves we use are tailored to the Prime or Alt-A residential mortgage backed securities that we own, which assume lower default rates and loss severity for Prime securities versus Alt-A securities. These default curves are scaled higher or lower depending on factors such as current underlying mortgage loan performance, rating agency loss projections, loan to value ratios, geographic diversity, as well as other appropriate considerations.
The determination of the credit loss component of a corporate bond (including redeemable preferred stocks) is based on the underlying financial performance of the issuer and their ability to meet their contractual obligations. Considerations in our evaluation include, but are not limited to, credit rating changes, financial statement and ratio analysis, changes in management, significant changes in credit spreads, breaches of financial covenants and a review of the economic outlook for the industry and markets in which they trade. In circumstances where an issuer appears unlikely to meet its future obligation, or the security's price decline is deemed other than temporary, an estimate of credit loss is determined. Credit loss is calculated using default probabilities as derived from the credit default swaps markets in conjunction with recovery rates derived from independent third party analysis or a best estimate of credit loss. This credit loss rate is then incorporated into a present value calculation based on an expected principal loss in the future discounted at the yield at the date of purchase and compared to amortized cost to determine the amount of credit loss associated with the security.
In addition, for debt securities which we do not intend to sell and it is not more likely than not we will be required to sell, but our intent changes due to changes or events that could not have been reasonably anticipated, an other than temporary impairment charge is recognized in net income and amortized cost is written down to fair value. Once an impairment charge has been recorded, we then continue to review the other than temporarily impaired securities for appropriate valuation on an ongoing basis. Unrealized losses may be recognized in future periods through a charge to earnings should we later conclude that the decline in fair value below amortized cost is other than temporary pursuant to our accounting policy described above. The use of different methodologies and assumptions to determine the fair value of these securities, except for declines that are other than temporary, are not reflectedinvestments and the timing and amount of impairments may have a material effect on the amounts presented in our consolidated financial statements.

F-9

AMERICAN EQUITY INVESTMENT LIFE HOLDING COMPANY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)


Equity securities are classified as available for sale and are reported at fair value. Unrealized gains and losses are included directly in a separate component of stockholders' equity, net of income taxes and certain adjustments for assumed changes in amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs and deferred sales inducements. Dividends are recognized when declared.
The carrying amounts of our impaired investments in fixed maturity and equity securities are adjusted for declines in value that are other than temporary. Other than temporary impairment losses are reported as a component of revenues in the consolidated statements of operations, which presents the amount of noncredit impairment losses for certain fixed maturity securities that is reported in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss). See Note 3 for further discussion of other than temporary impairment losses.
Deterioration in credit quality of the companies or assets backing our investment securities, deterioration in the condition of the financial services industry, imbalances in liquidity recurring in the marketplace or declines in real estate values may further affect the fair value of these investment securities and increase the potential that certain unrealized losses will be recognized as other than temporary impairments in the future.
Mortgage loans on real estate are reported at cost, adjusted for amortization of premiums and accrual of discounts. Interest income is recorded when earned; however, interest ceases to accrue for loans on which interest is more than 90 days past due based upon contractual terms and/or when the collection of interest is not considered probable. We evaluate theour mortgage loan portfolio for the establishment of a loan loss allowance by specific identification of impaired loans and the measurement of an estimated loss if any, for each impairedindividual loan identified and an analysisidentified. A mortgage loan is impaired when it is probable that we will be unable to collect all amounts due according to the contractual terms of the mortgage loan portfolio for the need of a general loan allowance for probable losses on all loans.agreement. If we determine that the value of any specific mortgage loan is impaired, the carrying amount of the mortgage loan will be reduced to its fair value, based upon the present value of expected future cash flows from the loan discounted at the loan's contractualeffective interest rate, or the fair value of the underlying collateral less estimated costs to sell.
In addition, we analyze the mortgage loan portfolio for the need of a general loan allowance for probable losses on all other loans on a quantitative and qualitative basis. The amount of the general loan allowance if any, is based upon ourmanagement's evaluation of the probabilitycollectability of collection,the loan portfolio, historical loss experience, delinquencies, credit concentrations, underwriting standards and national and local economic conditions.
We rate each of the mortgage loans in our portfolio based on factors such as historical operating performance, loan to value ratio and economic outlook, among others. We calculate a loss factor to apply to each rating based on historical losses we have recognized in our mortgage loan portfolio. We apply the loss factors to the total principal outstanding within each rating category to determine an appropriate estimate of the general loan loss allowance. We also assess the portfolio quantitatively and apply a loss rate to all loans without a specific allowance based on management's assessment of economic conditions, and we apply an additional amount of loss allowance to a group of loans that we have identified as having higher risk of loss.
Policy Liabilities for Fixed Index Annuities
We offer a variety of fixed index annuities with crediting strategies linked to the S&P 500 Index and other equity and bond market indices. We purchase call options on the applicable indices as an investment to provide the income needed to fund the annual index credits on the index products. See Financial Condition—Derivative Instruments. Certain derivative instruments embedded in the fixed index annuity contracts are recognized in the consolidated balance sheet at their fair values and changes in fair value are recognized immediately in our consolidated statements of operations in accordance with accounting standards for derivative instruments and hedging activities.
Accounting for derivatives prescribes that the contractual obligations for future annual index credits are treated as a "series of embedded derivatives" over the expected life of the applicable contracts. Policy liabilities for fixed index annuities are equal to the sum of the "host" (or guaranteed) component and the embedded derivative component for each fixed index annuity policy. The carryinghost value is established at inception of the contract and accreted over the policy's life at a constant rate of interest. We estimate the fair value of impaired loansthe embedded derivative component at each valuation date by (i) projecting policy contract values and minimum guaranteed contract values over the expected lives of the contracts and (ii) discounting the excess of the projected contract value amounts at the applicable risk free interest rates adjusted for our nonperformance risk related to those liabilities. The projections of policy contract values are based on our best estimate assumptions for future policy growth and future policy decrements. Our best estimate assumptions for future policy growth include assumptions for the expected index credits on the next policy anniversary date which are derived from the fair values of the underlying call options purchased to fund such index credits and the expected costs of annual call options we will purchase in the future to fund index credits beyond the next policy anniversary. The projections of minimum guaranteed contract values include the same best estimate assumptions for policy decrements as were used to project policy contract values. The amounts reported in the consolidated statements of operations as "Interest sensitive and index product benefits" represent amounts credited to policy liabilities pursuant to accounting by insurance companies for certain long-duration contracts which include index credits through the most recent policy anniversary. The amounts reported in the consolidated statements of operations as "Changes in fair value of embedded derivatives" equal the change in the difference between policy benefit reserves for fixed index annuities computed under the derivative accounting standard and the long-duration contracts accounting standard at each balance sheet date.
In general, the change in the fair value of the embedded derivatives will not correspond to the change in fair value of the purchased call options because the purchased call options are one year options while the options valued in the embedded derivatives represent the rights of the contract holder to receive index credits over the entire period the fixed index annuities are expected to be in force, which typically exceeds 10 years.
The most sensitive assumption in determining policy liabilities for fixed index annuities is reducedthe rates used to discount the excess projected contract values. As indicated above, the discount rate reflects our nonperformance risk. If the discount rates used to discount the excess projected contract values at December 31, 2016 were to increase by 100 basis points, our reserves for fixed index annuities would decrease by $451.4 million recorded through operations as a decrease in the change in fair value of embedded derivatives and there would be a corresponding decrease of $276.4 million to our combined balance for deferred policy acquisition costs and deferred sales inducements recorded through operations as an increase in amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs and deferred sales inducements. A decrease by 100 basis points in the discount rate used to discount the excess projected contract values would increase our reserves for fixed index annuities by $504.5 million recorded through operations as an increase in the change in fair value of embedded derivatives and increase our combined balance for deferred policy acquisition costs and deferred sales inducements by $299.5 million recorded through operations as a decrease in amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs and deferred sales inducements.
Liability for Lifetime Income Benefit Riders
Beginning in July 2007, substantially all of our fixed index annuity policies and many of our annual reset fixed rate deferred annuities were issued with a lifetime income benefit rider.
The liability for lifetime income benefit riders is based on estimates of the value of benefit payments expected to be paid in excess of projected policy values recognizing the excess over the expected lives of the underlying policies based on actual and expected assessments including spreads and product charges and fees. The inputs used in the calculation of the liability for lifetime income benefit riders include actual policy values, actual income account values, actual payout factors, actual roll-up rates and our best estimate assumptions for future policy growth, future policy decrements, the ages at which policyholders are expected to elect to begin to receive lifetime income benefit payments, the percentage of policyholders who elect to receive lifetime income benefit payments and the type of income benefit payments selected upon election. The assumptions are reviewed quarterly and revisions to the assumptions are made based on historical results and our best estimates of future experience. The liability for lifetime income benefit riders is included in policy benefit reserves in the consolidated balance sheets and the change in the liability is included in interest sensitive and index product benefits in the consolidated statements of operations. See Results of Operations for the Three Years Ended December 31, 2016 in this Item 7. for a discussion and presentation of the actual effects of assumption revisions.
Deferred Policy Acquisition Costs and Deferred Sales Inducements
Costs relating to the successful production of new business are not expensed when incurred but instead are capitalized as deferred policy acquisition costs or deferred sales inducements. Only costs which are expected to be recovered from future policy revenues and gross profits may be deferred.
Deferred policy acquisition costs and deferred sales inducements are subject to loss recognition testing on a quarterly basis or when an event occurs that may warrant loss recognition. Deferred policy acquisition costs consist principally of commissions and certain costs of policy issuance. Deferred sales inducements consist of premium and interest bonuses credited to policyholder account balances.

For annuity products, these costs are being amortized generally in proportion to expected gross profits from investment spreads, including the cost of hedging the fixed indexed annuity obligations, and, to a lesser extent, from product charges net of expected excess payments for lifetime income benefit riders, and mortality and expense margins. Current and future period gross profits/margins for fixed index annuities also include the impact of amounts recorded for the change in fair value of derivatives and the change in fair value of embedded derivatives. Current period amortization is adjusted retrospectively through an unlocking process when estimates of current or future gross profits/margins (including the impact of realized investment gains and losses) to be realized from a group of products are revised. Our estimates of future gross profits/margins are based on actuarial assumptions related to the underlying policies terms, lives of the policies, yield on investments supporting the liabilities and level of expenses necessary to maintain the polices over their entire lives. Revisions are made based on historical results and our best estimates of future experience. See Results of Operations for the Three Years Ended December 31, 2016 in this Item 7. for a discussion and presentation of the actual effects of unlocking.
Estimated future gross profits vary based on a number of sources including investment spread margins, surrender charge income, policy persistency, policy administrative expenses and realized gains and losses on investments including credit related other than temporary impairment losses. Estimated future gross profits are most sensitive to changes in investment spread margins which are the most significant component of gross profits. If estimated gross profits for all future years on business in force at December 31, 2016 were to increase by 10%, our combined balance for deferred policy acquisition costs and deferred sales inducements at December 31, 2016 would increase by $182.2 million recorded through operations as a decrease to amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs and deferred sales inducements. Correspondingly, a 10% decrease in estimated gross profits for all future years would result in a $202.7 million decrease in the combined December 31, 2016 balances recorded through operations as an increase to amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs and deferred sales inducements.
Deferred Income Taxes
We account for income taxes using the liability method. This method provides for the tax effects of transactions reported in the audited consolidated financial statements for both taxes currently due and deferred. Deferred income taxes reflect the impact of temporary differences between the amount of assets and liabilities recognized for financial reporting purposes and such amounts recognized for tax purposes. A temporary difference is a transaction, or amount of a transaction, that is recognized currently for financial reporting purposes but will not be recognized for tax purposes until a future tax period, or is recognized currently for tax purposes but will not be recognized for financial reporting purposes until a future reporting period. Deferred income taxes are measured by applying enacted tax rates for the years in which the temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled to the amount of each temporary difference.
The realization of deferred income tax assets is primarily based upon management's estimates of future taxable income. Valuation allowances are established when management estimates, based on available information, that it is more likely than not that deferred income tax assets will not be realized. Significant judgment is required in determining whether valuation allowances should be established, as well as the amount of such allowances. When making such determination, consideration is given to, among other things, the following:
future taxable income of the necessary character exclusive of reversing temporary differences and carryforwards;
future reversals of existing taxable temporary differences;
taxable income in prior carryback years; and
tax planning strategies.
Actual realization of deferred income tax assets and liabilities may materially differ from these estimates as a result of changes in tax laws as well as unanticipated future transactions impacting related income tax balances.
The realization of deferred income tax assets related to unrealized losses on our available for sale fixed maturity securities is also based upon our intent to hold these securities for a period of time sufficient to allow for a recovery in fair value and not realize the unrealized loss.
New Accounting Pronouncements
See Note 1 to our audited consolidated financial statements in this Form 10-K beginning on page F-9, which is incorporated by reference in this Item 7, for new accounting pronouncement disclosures.
Item 7A.    Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
We seek to invest our available funds in a manner that will maximize shareholder value and fund future obligations to policyholders and debtors, subject to appropriate risk considerations. We seek to meet this objective through investments that: (i) consist substantially of investment grade fixed maturity securities, (ii) have projected returns which satisfy our spread targets and (iii) have characteristics which support the underlying liabilities. Many of our products incorporate surrender charges, market interest rate adjustments or other features to encourage persistency.
We seek to maximize the total return on our available for sale investments through active investment management. Accordingly, we have determined that our available for sale portfolio of fixed maturity securities is available to be sold in response to: (i) changes in market interest rates; (ii) changes in relative values of individual securities and asset sectors; (iii) changes in prepayment risks; (iv) changes in credit quality outlook for certain securities; (v) liquidity needs; and (vi) other factors.

Interest rate risk is our primary market risk exposure. Substantial and sustained increases and decreases in market interest rates can affect the profitability of our products, the fair value of our investments and the amount of interest we pay on our floating rate term loan and subordinated debentures. See Note 9 to our consolidated financial statements, which is incorporated by reference to this Item 7A, for information regarding the floating interest rate on our term loan. Our floating rate trust preferred securities bear interest at the three month LIBOR plus 3.50% - 4.00%. Our outstanding balance of floating rate trust preferred securities was $164.5 million at December 31, 2016, of which $85.5 million has been swapped to a fixed rate which began in March 2014 and $79.0 million has been capped for a term of seven years which began in July 2014 (See Note 5 to our consolidated financial statements in this Form 10-K). The profitability of most of our products depends on the spreads between interest yield on investments and rates credited on insurance liabilities. We have the ability to adjust crediting rates (caps, participation rates or asset fee rates for fixed index annuities) on substantially all of our annuity liabilities at least annually (subject to minimum guaranteed values). In addition, substantially all of our annuity products have surrender and withdrawal penalty provisions designed to encourage persistency and to help ensure targeted spreads are earned. However, competitive factors, including the impact of the level of surrenders and withdrawals, may limit our ability to adjust or maintain crediting rates at levels necessary to avoid narrowing of spreads under certain market conditions.
A major component of our interest rate risk management program is structuring the investment portfolio with cash flow characteristics consistent with the cash flow characteristics of our insurance liabilities. We use models to simulate cash flows expected from our existing business under various interest rate scenarios. These simulations enable us to measure the potential gain or loss in fair value of our interest rate-sensitive financial instruments, to evaluate the adequacy of expected cash flows from our assets to meet the expected cash requirements of our liabilities and to determine if it is necessary to lengthen or shorten the average life and duration of our investment portfolio. The "duration" of a security is the time weighted present value of the security's expected cash flows and is used to measure a security's sensitivity to changes in interest rates. When the durations of assets and liabilities are similar, exposure to interest rate risk is minimized because a change in value of assets should be largely offset by a change in the value of liabilities.
If interest rates were to increase 10% (31 basis points) from levels at December 31, 2016, we estimate that the fair value of our fixed maturity securities would decrease by approximately $1.0 billion. The impact on stockholders' equity of such decrease (net of income taxes and certain adjustments for changes in amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs and deferred sales inducements) would be a decrease of $291.7 million in accumulated other comprehensive income and a decrease in stockholders' equity. The models used to estimate the impact of a 10% change in market interest rates incorporate numerous assumptions, require significant estimates and assume an immediate and parallel change in interest rates without any management of the investment portfolio in reaction to such change. Consequently, potential changes in value of our financial instruments indicated by the establishmentsimulations will likely be different from the actual changes experienced under given interest rate scenarios, and the differences may be material. Because we actively manage our investments and liabilities, our net exposure to interest rates can vary over time. However, any such decreases in the fair value of our fixed maturity securities (unless related to credit concerns of the issuer requiring recognition of an allowance for loanother than temporary impairment) would generally be realized only if we were required to sell such securities at losses changesprior to their maturity to meet our liquidity needs, which are recognized as realized gains or losses on investments. Interest income on impaired loans is recorded on a cash basis.
Other invested assets include company owned life insurance, real estate, limited partnerships accounted forwe manage using the equity methodsurrender and policy loans. Company owned life insurancewithdrawal provisions of our annuity contracts and through other means. See Financial Condition—Liquidity for Insurance Operations for a further discussion of the liquidity risk.
At December 31, 2016, 35% of our fixed income securities have call features, of which 0.1% ($55.7 million) were subject to call redemption. Another 3.1% ($1.3 billion) will become subject to call redemption during 2017. Approximately 70% of our fixed income securities that have call features are not callable until within six months of their stated maturities. During the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, we received $1.2 billion and $0.7 billion, respectively, in net redemption proceeds related to the exercise of such call options. We have reinvestment risk related to these redemptions to the extent we cannot reinvest the net proceeds in assets with credit quality and yield characteristics similar to the redeemed bonds. Such reinvestment risk typically occurs in a declining rate environment. Should rates decline to levels which tighten the spread between our average portfolio yield and average cost of interest credited on annuity liabilities, we have the ability to reduce crediting rates (caps, participation rates or asset fees for index annuities) on most of our annuity liabilities to maintain the spread at our targeted level. At December 31, 2016, approximately 98% of our annuity liabilities were subject to annual adjustment of the applicable crediting rates at our discretion, limited by minimum guaranteed crediting rates specified in the policies.
We purchase call options on the applicable indices to fund the annual index credits on our fixed index annuities. These options are primarily one-year instruments purchased to match the funding requirements of the underlying policies. Fair value changes associated with those investments are substantially offset by an increase or decrease in the amounts added to policyholder account balances for fixed index products. The difference between proceeds received at expiration of these options and index credits, as shown in the following table, is recorded atprimarily due to over-hedging as a result of policyholder behavior being different than our expectations.
 Year Ended December 31,
 2016 2015 2014
 (Dollars in thousands)
Annual index credits to policyholders on their anniversaries$267,995
 $587,705
 $1,096,504
Proceeds received at expiration of options related to such credits272,277
 602,436
 1,103,710
On the amountanniversary dates of the index policies, we purchase new one-year call options to fund the next annual index credits. The risk associated with these prospective purchases is the uncertainty of the cost, which will determine whether we are able to earn our spread on our index business. We manage this risk through the terms of our fixed index annuities, which permit us to change caps, participation rates and asset fees, subject to contractual features. By modifying caps, participation rates or asset fees, we can limit option costs to budgeted amounts, except in cases where the contractual features would prevent further modifications. Based upon actuarial testing which we conduct as a part of the design of our index products and on an ongoing basis, we believe the risk that can be realizedcontractual features would prevent us from controlling option costs is not material.

Item 8.    Consolidated Financial Statements and Supplementary Data
The audited consolidated financial statements are included as a part of this report on Form 10-K on pages F-1 through F-54.

Item 9.    Changes in and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure
None.

Item 9A.    Controls and Procedures
(a)Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures.
In accordance with the Securities Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e), our management, under the insurance contract atsupervision of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the reporting period which iscovered by this report on Form 10-K. Based on that evaluation, the cash surrender value adjusted for other charges or other amounts dueChief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that are probable at settlement. Policy loans are stated at current unpaid principal balances.
Real estate owned is reported at cost less accumulated depreciation. Cost is determined at the time ownership is acquired in satisfactionour disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of mortgage loans and is the lowerDecember 31, 2016.
(b)Management's Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting.
The management of the carrying valueCompany is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting, as defined in the Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f). Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
The Company's management assessed the effectiveness of the mortgage loan or fair valueCompany's internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2016 based upon criteria established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the real estate less its estimated costTreadway Commission (COSO). Based on the assessment, management has determined that we maintained effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2016.
The Company's independent registered public accounting firm, KPMG LLP, who audited the consolidated financial statements included in this annual report on Form 10-K, has issued an attestation report on the effectiveness of management's internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2016. This report appears on page F-2 of this annual report on Form 10-K.
(c)Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting.
Other than the remediation described below, there were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the quarter ended December 31, 2016, that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to sell. Buildingsmaterially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
(d) Remediation of the Material Weakness in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting.
A material weakness is defined as a deficiency, or a combination of deficiencies, in internal control over financial reporting, such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of a company's annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis. As previously reported, we did not have adequate controls designed and improvements are depreciated usingin place to ensure that we correctly implemented changes made to the straight-line method over their estimated useful lives. Impairment losses on real estate owned are recognized when there are indicatorscalculation of impairment presentlifetime income benefit reserves in the third quarter of 2015. Specifically, the design of our control relating to the review of the implementation of code changes to reflect revised assumptions and the expected future undiscountedimpact of those changes (the “review control”) on the lifetime income benefit reserves was not modified given the complex nature and volume of code changes we made as part of the third quarter review. As a result, we failed to identify an immaterial after-tax calculation error. This amount was corrected in the fourth quarter of 2015 prior to issuing our consolidated financial statements. The control deficiency related to the lifetime income benefit reserves created a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement to the consolidated financial statements would not be prevented or detected on a timely basis and therefore we concluded that the deficiency represented a material weakness in the Company's internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2015.
With the oversight of our audit committee, we took corrective steps during 2016 to remediate the underlying causes of the material weakness. The corrective steps we have taken, which are intended to ensure that code changes to the lifetime income benefit reserves calculation function as intended, are:
- The “review control” over the implementation of code changes to our lifetime income benefit reserves was enhanced to ensure that all code changes are reviewed by an individual who is not responsible for the implementation of the code changes.
- The scope of the “review control” over the implementation of code changes to our lifetime income benefit reserves was expanded to include detailed testing of our lifetime income benefit reserves calculation to ensure any code changes are implemented accurately.
The enhanced “review control” as described above was implemented during the fourth quarter of 2015. During the fourth quarter of 2016 and prior to the issuance of our consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2016, we completed sufficient instances of

testing of the operating effectiveness of the enhanced “review control” and concluded that the above identified material weakness in our internal controls over financial reporting has been fully remediated.

Item 9B.    Other Information
There is no information required to be disclosed on Form 8-K for the quarter ended December 31, 2016 which has not been previously reported.

PART III
The information required by Part III is incorporated by reference from our definitive proxy statement for our annual meeting of shareholders to be held June 1, 2017 to be filed with the Commission pursuant to Regulation 14A within 120 days after December 31, 2016.
PART IV

Item 15.    Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules
Financial Statements and Financial Statement Schedules.    See Index to Consolidated Financial Statements and Schedules on page F-1 for a list of financial statements and financial statement schedules included in this report.
All other schedules to the audited consolidated financial statements required by Article 7 of Regulation S-X are omitted because they are not applicable, not required, or because the information is included elsewhere in the audited consolidated financial statements or notes thereto.
Exhibits.    See Exhibit Index immediately preceding the Exhibits for a list of Exhibits filed with this report.

SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized, this 27th day of February 2017.
AMERICAN EQUITY INVESTMENT LIFE HOLDING COMPANY
By:/s/ JOHN M. MATOVINA
John M. Matovina,
Chief Executive Officer and President
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this registration statement has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated:
SignatureTitle (Capacity)Date
/s/ JOHN M. MATOVINA
Chief Executive Officer, President and Director
(Principal Executive Officer)
February 27, 2017
John M. Matovina
/s/ TED M. JOHNSON
Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
(Principal Financial Officer)
February 27, 2017
Ted M. Johnson
/s/ SCOTT A. SAMUELSON
Vice President—Controller
(Principal Accounting Officer)
February 27, 2017
Scott A. Samuelson
/s/ D.J. NOBLEChairman of the Board and DirectorFebruary 27, 2017
D.J. Noble
/s/ JOYCE A. CHAPMANDirectorFebruary 27, 2017
Joyce A. Chapman
/s/ ALEXANDER M. CLARKDirectorFebruary 27, 2017
Alexander M. Clark
/s/ JAMES M. GERLACHDirectorFebruary 27, 2017
James M. Gerlach
/s/ ROBERT L. HOWEDirectorFebruary 27, 2017
Robert L. Howe
/s/ WILLIAM R. KUNKELDirectorFebruary 27, 2017
William R. Kunkel
/s/ ALAN D. MATULADirectorFebruary 27, 2017
Alan D. Matula
/s/ DAVID S. MULCAHYDirectorFebruary 27, 2017
David S. Mulcahy
/s/ GERARD D. NEUGENTDirectorFebruary 27, 2017
Gerard D. Neugent
/s/ DEBRA J. RICHARDSONDirectorFebruary 27, 2017
Debra J. Richardson
/s/ A.J. STRICKLAND, IIIDirectorFebruary 27, 2017
A.J. Strickland, III

AMERICAN EQUITY INVESTMENT LIFE HOLDING COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SCHEDULES
YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014
Consolidated Financial Statements:
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Schedules:





Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
The Board of Directors and Stockholders
American Equity Investment Life Holding Company:
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of American Equity Investment Life Holding Company and subsidiaries (the Company) as of December 31, 2016 and 2015, and the related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive income (loss), changes in stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2016. In connection with our audits of the consolidated financial statements, we also have audited the financial statement schedules listed in the Index on page F-1. We also have audited the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2016, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). The Company’s management is responsible for these consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedules, for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting, and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedules and an opinion on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement and whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audits of the consolidated financial statements included examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. Our audit of internal control over financial reporting included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audits also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinions.
A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not sufficientprevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to recoverfuture periods are subject to the real estate's carrying value. Any impairment losses are reportedrisk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the American Equity Investment Life Holding Company and subsidiaries as realized lossesof December 31, 2016 and are part2015, and the results of net income.their operations and their cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2016, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. Also in our opinion, the related financial statement schedules, when considered in relation to the basic consolidated financial statements taken as a whole, present fairly, in all material respects, the information set forth therein. Also in our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2016, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).
/s/ KPMG LLP
Des Moines, Iowa
February 27, 2017


AMERICAN EQUITY INVESTMENT LIFE HOLDING COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(Dollars in thousands, except share and per share data)

 December 31,
 2016 2015
Assets   
Investments:   
Fixed maturity securities:   
Available for sale, at fair value (amortized cost: 2016 - $39,953,955; 2015 - $35,823,710)$41,060,494
 $36,421,839
Held for investment, at amortized cost (fair value: 2016 - $68,766; 2015 - $65,377)76,825
 76,622
Mortgage loans on real estate2,480,956
 2,435,257
Derivative instruments830,519
 337,256
Other investments308,774
 299,358
Total investments44,757,568
 39,570,332
    
Cash and cash equivalents791,266
 397,749
Coinsurance deposits4,639,492
 3,187,470
Accrued investment income397,773
 362,104
Deferred policy acquisition costs2,905,377
 2,905,136
Deferred sales inducements2,208,218
 2,232,148
Deferred income taxes168,578
 232,683
Income taxes recoverable11,474
 29,599
Other assets173,726
 112,171
Total assets$56,053,472
 $49,029,392
    
Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity   
Liabilities:   
Policy benefit reserves$51,637,026
 $45,495,431
Other policy funds and contract claims298,347
 324,850
Notes and loan payable493,755
 393,227
Subordinated debentures241,853
 241,452
Other liabilities1,090,896
 629,897
Total liabilities53,761,877
 47,084,857
    
Stockholders' equity:   
Preferred stock, par value $1 per share, 2,000,000 shares authorized,
2016 and 2015 - no shares issued and outstanding

 
Common stock, par value $1 per share, 200,000,000 shares authorized; issued and outstanding:
2016 - 88,001,130 shares (excluding 2,887,082 treasury shares);
2015 - 81,354,079 shares (excluding 3,448,750 treasury shares)
88,001
 81,354
Additional paid-in capital770,344
 630,367
Accumulated other comprehensive income339,966
 201,663
Retained earnings1,093,284
 1,031,151
Total stockholders' equity2,291,595
 1,944,535
Total liabilities and stockholders' equity$56,053,472
 $49,029,392
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.


AMERICAN EQUITY INVESTMENT LIFE HOLDING COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)


 Year Ended December 31,
 2016 2015 2014
Revenues:     
Premiums and other considerations$43,767
 $36,048
 $32,623
Annuity product charges173,579
 136,168
 118,990
Net investment income1,849,872
 1,692,192
 1,531,667
Change in fair value of derivatives164,219
 (336,146) 504,825
Net realized gains (losses) on investments, excluding other than temporary
impairment ("OTTI") losses
11,524
 10,211
 (4,003)
OTTI losses on investments:     
Total OTTI losses(21,349) (25,547) 
Portion of OTTI losses recognized in (from) other comprehensive income(1,330) 6,011
 (2,627)
Net OTTI losses recognized in operations(22,679) (19,536) (2,627)
Loss on extinguishment of debt
 
 (12,502)
Total revenues2,220,282
 1,518,937
 2,168,973
      
Benefits and expenses:     
Insurance policy benefits and change in future policy benefits52,483
 45,458
 41,815
Interest sensitive and index product benefits725,472
 968,053
 1,473,700
Amortization of deferred sales inducements251,166
 209,390
 131,419
Change in fair value of embedded derivatives543,465
 (464,698) 32,321
Interest expense on notes and loan payable28,248
 28,849
 36,370
Interest expense on subordinated debentures12,958
 12,239
 12,122
Amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs374,012
 286,114
 163,578
Other operating costs and expenses102,231
 96,218
 81,584
Total benefits and expenses2,090,035
 1,181,623
 1,972,909
Income before income taxes130,247
 337,314
 196,064
Income tax expense47,004
 117,484
 70,041
Net income$83,243
 $219,830
 $126,023
      
Earnings per common share$0.98
 $2.78
 $1.69
Earnings per common share - assuming dilution$0.97
 $2.72
 $1.58
Weighted average common shares outstanding (in thousands):     
Earnings per common share84,793
 78,937
 74,431
Earnings per common share - assuming dilution85,605
 80,961
 79,894
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

AMERICAN EQUITY INVESTMENT LIFE HOLDING COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)
(Dollars in thousands)

 Year Ended December 31,
 2016 2015 2014
Net income$83,243
 $219,830
 $126,023
Other comprehensive income (loss):     
Change in net unrealized investment gains/losses (1)207,994
 (797,374) 1,038,604
Noncredit component of OTTI losses (1)556
 (2,927) 1,265
Reclassification of unrealized investment gains/losses to net income (1)4,224
 703
 (1,092)
Other comprehensive income (loss) before income tax212,774
 (799,598) 1,038,777
Income tax effect related to other comprehensive income (loss)(74,471) 279,860
 (363,572)
Other comprehensive income (loss)138,303
 (519,738) 675,205
Comprehensive income (loss)$221,546
 $(299,908) $801,228
(1)Net of related adjustments to amortization of deferred sales inducements and deferred policy acquisition costs.
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.



AMERICAN EQUITY INVESTMENT LIFE HOLDING COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)


 
Common
Stock
 
Additional
Paid-in
Capital
 
Unallocated
Common
Stock Held
by ESOP
 
Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Income
 
Retained
Earnings
 
Total
Stockholders'
Equity
Balance at December 31, 2013$70,535
 $550,400
 $(631) $46,196
 $718,187
 $1,384,687
Net income for the year
 
 
 
 126,023
 126,023
Other comprehensive income
 
 
 675,205
 
 675,205
Allocation of 58,618 shares of common stock by ESOP, including excess income tax benefits
 721
 631
 
 
 1,352
Share-based compensation, including excess income tax benefits
 7,705
 
 
 
 7,705
Issuance of 1,567,607 shares of common stock under compensation plans, including excess income tax benefits1,568
 13,137
 
 
 
 14,705
Extinguishment of convertible senior notes, net of tax, including 3,959,396 shares of common stock issued upon conversion3,959
 (7,488) 
 
 
 (3,529)
Warrants reclassified to embedded derivative liability to be settled in cash
 (51,257) 
 
 
 (51,257)
Dividends on common stock ($0.20 per share)
 
 
 
 (15,015) (15,015)
Balance at December 31, 201476,062
 513,218
 
 721,401
 829,195
 2,139,876
Net income for the year
 
 
 
 219,830
 219,830
Other comprehensive loss
 
 
 (519,738) 
 (519,738)
Share-based compensation, including excess income tax benefits
 9,976
 
 
 
 9,976
Issuance of common stock via public offering4,300
 100,179
 
 
 
 104,479
Issuance of 944,504 shares of common stock under compensation plans, including excess income tax benefits944
 7,042
 
 
 
 7,986
Issuance of 47,868 shares of common stock to settle warrants that have reached their expiration48
 (48) 
 
 
 
Dividends on common stock ($0.22 per share)
 
 
 
 (17,874) (17,874)
Balance at December 31, 201581,354
 630,367
 
 201,663
 1,031,151
 1,944,535
Net income for the year
 
 
 
 83,243
 83,243
Other comprehensive income
 
 
 138,303
 
 138,303
Share-based compensation, including excess income tax benefits
 7,218
 
 
 
 7,218
Issuance of common stock via settlement of forward sale agreements5,590
 129,072
 
 
 
 134,662
Issuance of 964,053 shares of common stock under compensation plans, including excess income tax benefits964
 3,781
 
 
 
 4,745
Issuance of 92,998 shares of common stock to settle warrants that have reached their expiration93
 (94) 
 
 
 (1)
Dividends on common stock ($0.24 per share)
 
 
 
 (21,110) (21,110)
Balance at December 31, 2016$88,001
 $770,344
 $
 $339,966
 $1,093,284
 $2,291,595
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

AMERICAN EQUITY INVESTMENT LIFE HOLDING COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Dollars in thousands)

 Year Ended December 31,
 2016 2015 2014
Operating activities     
Net income$83,243
 $219,830
 $126,023
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:     
Interest sensitive and index product benefits725,472
 968,053
 1,473,700
Amortization of deferred sales inducements251,166
 209,390
 131,419
Annuity product charges(173,579) (136,168) (118,990)
Change in fair value of embedded derivatives543,465
 (464,698) 32,321
Increase in traditional life and accident and health insurance reserves12,724
 5,097
 2,385
Policy acquisition costs deferred(543,325) (657,639) (426,882)
Amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs374,012
 286,114
 163,578
Provision for depreciation and other amortization3,879
 4,610
 9,490
Amortization of discounts and premiums on investments1,070
 (8,464) (14,960)
Loss on extinguishment of debt
 
 12,502
Realized gains (losses) on investments and net OTTI losses recognized in operations11,155
 9,325
 6,630
Change in fair value of derivatives(165,727) 334,300
 (506,328)
Deferred income taxes (benefits)(10,408) 41,916
 (46,504)
Share-based compensation6,692
 7,373
 3,544
Change in accrued investment income(35,669) (35,545) (24,918)
Change in income taxes recoverable/payable18,125
 (20,027) (19,405)
Change in other assets1,812
 71
 (2,771)
Change in other policy funds and contract claims(34,411) (49,092) (60,931)
Change in collateral held for derivatives414,655
 (269,474) 27,839
Change in other liabilities(55,940) 75,794
 (51,008)
Other(14,089) (15,962) (8,948)
Net cash provided by operating activities1,414,322
 504,804
 707,786
      
Investing activities     
Sales, maturities, or repayments of investments:     
Fixed maturity securities—available for sale2,746,510
 1,612,121
 1,490,906
Mortgage loans on real estate383,763
 468,102
 453,937
Derivative instruments284,470
 640,467
 1,169,874
Other investments14,045
 16,792
 23,165
Acquisitions of investments:     
Fixed maturity securities—available for sale(6,883,895) (7,256,137) (5,191,781)
Mortgage loans on real estate(428,833) (455,286) (327,654)
Derivative instruments(602,349) (588,859) (492,296)
Other investments(11,559) (13,092) (72,548)
Purchases of property, furniture and equipment(1,197) (1,313) (1,352)
Net cash used in investing activities(4,499,045) (5,577,205) (2,947,749)

AMERICAN EQUITY INVESTMENT LIFE HOLDING COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (Continued)
(Dollars in thousands)

 Year Ended December 31,
 2016 2015 2014
Financing activities     
Receipts credited to annuity and single premium universal life policyholder account balances$7,092,348
 $7,051,227
 $4,160,005
Coinsurance deposits(1,317,555) (80,777) 109,184
Return of annuity policyholder account balances(2,535,669) (2,271,950) (2,025,203)
Financing fees incurred and deferred(1,456) 
 (100)
Repayment of notes payable
 (48,152) (219,094)
Proceeds from issuance of debt100,000
 
 
Net proceeds from settlement of notes hedges and warrants
 25,775
 16,558
Acquisition of common stock
 (16) 
Excess tax benefits realized from share-based compensation plans527
 3,649
 5,184
Proceeds from issuance of common stock139,654
 112,481
 13,681
Change in checks in excess of cash balance21,501
 (5,727) (1,252)
Dividends paid(21,110) (17,874) (15,015)
Net cash provided by financing activities3,478,240
 4,768,636
 2,043,948
Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents393,517
 (303,765) (196,015)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year397,749
 701,514
 897,529
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year$791,266
 $397,749
 $701,514
      
Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information     
Cash paid during the year for:     
Interest expense$39,647
 $39,118
 $42,989
Income taxes39,066
 91,887
 132,754
Non-cash operating activity:     
Deferral of sales inducements353,966
 486,924
 330,079
Non-cash investing activity:     
Real estate acquired in satisfaction of mortgage loans
 
 14,555
Mortgage loan on real estate sold
 4,879
 
Non-cash financing activity:     
Common stock issued in extinguishment of debt
 
 95,993
Common stock issued to settle warrants that have expired93
 48
 
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.


AMERICAN EQUITY INVESTMENT LIFE HOLDING COMPANY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
1.     Significant Accounting Policies
Derivative Instruments
Our derivative instruments primarily consist of call options purchased to provide the income needed to fund the annual index credits on our fixed index annuity products. The fair value of the call options is based upon the amount of cash that would be required to settle the call options obtained from the counterparties adjusted for the nonperformance risk of the counterparty. The nonperformance risk for each counterparty is based upon its credit default swap rate. We have no performance obligations related to the call options.
None of our derivatives qualify for hedge accounting, thus, any change in the fair value of the derivatives that are not classified as equity is recognized immediately in the consolidated statements of operations. A presentation of our derivative instruments along with a discussion of the business strategy involved with our derivatives is included in Note 5 to our audited consolidated financial statements in this Form 10-K, which is incorporated by reference in this Item 7.
Liabilities
Our liability for policy benefit reserves increased to $51.6 billion at December 31, 2016 compared to $45.5 billion at December 31, 2015, primarily due to additional annuity sales as discussed above. Substantially all of our annuity products have a surrender charge feature designed to reduce the risk of early withdrawal or surrender of the policies and to compensate us for our costs if policies are withdrawn early. Notwithstanding these policy features, the withdrawal rates of policyholder funds may be affected by changes in interest rates and other factors.
See Note 9 to our audited consolidated financial statements in this Form 10-K, which is incorporated by reference in this Item 7 for discussion of our notes and loan payable and borrowings under repurchase agreements.
See Note 10 to our audited consolidated financial statements for additional information concerning our subordinated debentures payable to, and the preferred securities issued by, our subsidiary trusts.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Liquidity for Insurance Operations
Our insurance subsidiaries' primary sources of cash flow are annuity deposits, investment income, and proceeds from the sale, maturity and calls of investments. The primary uses of funds are investment purchases, payments to policyholders in connection with surrenders and withdrawals, policy acquisition costs and other operating expenses.
Liquidity requirements are met primarily by funds provided from operations. Our life subsidiaries generally receive adequate cash flow from annuity deposits and investment income to meet their obligations. Annuity and life insurance liabilities are generally long-term in nature. However, a primary liquidity concern is the risk of an extraordinary level of early policyholder withdrawals. We include provisions within our annuity policies, such as surrender charges and bonus vesting, that help limit and discourage early withdrawals. At December 31, 2016, approximately 94% of our annuity liabilities were subject to penalty upon surrender, with a weighted average remaining surrender charge period of 8.6 years and a weighted average surrender charge percentage of 13.8%.
Our insurance subsidiaries continue to have adequate cash flows from annuity deposits and investment income to meet their policyholder and other obligations. Net cash flows from annuity deposits and funds returned to policyholders as surrenders, withdrawals and death claims were $3.2 billion for the year ended December 31, 2016 compared to $4.7 billion for the year ended December 31, 2015 with the decrease attributable to a $1.2 billion decrease in net annuity deposits after coinsurance and a $236.3 million (after coinsurance) increase in funds returned to policyholders. We continue to invest the net proceeds from policyholder transactions and investment activities in high quality fixed maturity securities and fixed rate commercial mortgage loans.
Liquidity of Parent Company
We, as the parent company, are a legal entity separate and distinct from our subsidiaries, and have no business operations. We need liquidity primarily to service our debt (senior notes, term loan and subordinated debentures issued to subsidiary trusts), pay operating expenses and pay dividends to stockholders. Our assets consist primarily of the capital stock and surplus notes of our subsidiaries. Accordingly, our future cash flows depend upon the availability of dividends, surplus note interest payments and other statutorily permissible payments from our subsidiaries, such as payments under our investment advisory agreements and tax allocation agreement with our subsidiaries. These sources provide adequate cash flow for us to meet our current and reasonably foreseeable future obligations and we expect they will be adequate to fund our parent company cash flow requirements in 2017.
The ability of our life insurance subsidiaries to pay dividends or distributions, including surplus note payments, will be limited by applicable laws and regulations of the states in which our life insurance subsidiaries are domiciled, which subject our life insurance subsidiaries to significant regulatory restrictions. These laws and regulations require, among other things, our insurance subsidiaries to maintain minimum solvency requirements and limit the amount of dividends these subsidiaries can pay.

Currently, American Equity Life may pay dividends or make other distributions without the prior approval of the Iowa Insurance Commissioner, unless such payments, together with all other such payments within the preceding twelve months, exceed the greater of (1) American Equity Life's net gain from operations for the preceding calendar year, or (2) 10% of American Equity Life's statutory capital and surplus at the preceding December 31. For 2017, up to $272.7 million can be distributed as dividends by American Equity Life without prior approval of the Iowa Insurance Commissioner. In addition, dividends and surplus note payments may be made only out of statutory earned surplus, and all surplus note payments are subject to prior approval by regulatory authorities in the life subsidiary's state of domicile. American Equity Life had $1.4 billion of statutory earned surplus at December 31, 2016.
The maximum distribution permitted by law or contract is not necessarily indicative of an insurer's actual ability to pay such distributions, which may be constrained by business and regulatory considerations, such as the impact of such distributions on surplus, which could affect the insurer's ratings or competitive position, the amount of premiums that can be written and the ability to pay future dividends or make other distributions. Further, state insurance laws and regulations require that the statutory surplus of our life subsidiaries following any dividend or distribution must be reasonable in relation to their outstanding liabilities and adequate for their financial needs. Along with solvency regulations, the primary driver in determining the amount of capital used for dividends is the level of capital needed to maintain desired financial strength ratings from A.M. Best and Standard and Poor's. Both regulators and rating agencies could become more conservative in their methodology and criteria, including increasing capital requirements for our insurance subsidiaries which, in turn, could negatively affect the cash available to us from insurance subsidiaries. As of December 31, 2016, we estimate American Equity Life has sufficient statutory capital and surplus, combined with capital available to the holding company, to meet this rating objective. However, this capital may not be sufficient if significant future losses are incurred or a rating agency modifies its rating criteria and access to additional capital could be limited.
The transfer of funds by American Equity Life is also restricted by a covenant in our line of credit agreement which requires American Equity Life to maintain a minimum risk-based capital ratio of 275% and a minimum level of statutory surplus equal to the sum of 1) 80% of statutory surplus at June 30, 2016, 2) 50% of the statutory net income for each fiscal quarter ending after June 30, 2016, and 3) 50% of all capital contributed to American Equity Life after June 30, 2016. American Equity Life's risk-based capital ratio was 342% at December 31, 2016. Under this agreement, we are also required to maintain a maximum ratio of adjusted debt to total adjusted capital of 0.35.
In August 2015, we completed an underwritten public offering of 9,890,000 shares of our common stock at a public offering price of $25.25 per share, of which 5,590,000 shares were subject to forward sale agreements. During the third quarter of 2015, we contributed $120 million to the capital and surplus of American Equity Life which included $104.5 million of initial net proceeds from the issuance of 4.3 million shares of common stock in our August 2015 public stock offering. We settled the forward sale agreements on August 1, 2016, and issued 5,590,000 shares of our common stock and received $134.7 million in net proceeds which was contributed to the capital and surplus of American Equity Life.
In 2015 and 2014, we retired $344 million aggregate principal amount of three convertible note issues. The total consideration paid to retire the convertible notes included $486 million of cash and 9.45 million shares of our common stock. We have now extinguished all of our convertible notes.
Cash and cash equivalents of the parent holding company at December 31, 2016, were $36.4 million. In addition, as discussed in Note 9 to our audited consolidated financial statements we have a $150 million revolving line of credit agreement. This revolving line of credit terminates on September 30, 2021, and borrowings are available for general corporate purposes of the parent company and its subsidiaries. We also have the ability to issue equity, debt or other types of securities through one or more methods of distribution under a currently effective shelf registration statement on Form S-3. The terms of any offering would be established at the time of the offering, subject to market conditions.
On August 5, 2015, Standard & Poor's raised its counterparty credit rating on American Equity Investment Life Holding Company to BBB- from BB+ and its financial strength rating on American Equity Life to A- from BBB+. On August 7, 2015, Fitch Ratings upgraded the issuer default rating of American Equity Investment Life Holding Company to BBB- from BB+.
Statutory accounting practices prescribed or permitted for our life subsidiaries differ in many respects from those governing the preparation of financial statements under GAAP. Accordingly, statutory operating results and statutory capital and surplus may differ substantially from amounts reported in the GAAP basis financial statements for comparable items. Information as to statutory capital and surplus and statutory net income for our life subsidiaries as of December 31, 2016 and 2015 and for the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014 is included in Note 12 to our audited consolidated financial statements.

In the normal course of business, we enter into financing transactions, lease agreements, or other commitments. These commitments may obligate us to certain cash flows during future periods. The following table summarizes such obligations as of December 31, 2016.
 Payments Due by Period
 Total 
Less Than
1 year
 1–3 Years 4–5 Years 
After
5 Years
 (Dollars in thousands)
Annuity and single premium universal life products (1)$51,628,372
 $2,872,877
 $11,385,699
 $7,625,528
 $29,744,268
Notes and loan payable, including interest payments (2)628,428
 29,537
 158,419
 440,472
 
Subordinated debentures, including interest payments (3)550,997
 12,575
 25,152
 25,152
 488,118
Operating leases16,871
 1,890
 3,813
 3,704
 7,464
Mortgage loan funding and other investments158,248
 118,822
 25,626
 13,800
 
Total$52,982,916
 $3,035,701
 $11,598,709
 $8,108,656
 $30,239,850
(1)Amounts shown in this table are projected payments through the year 2036 which we are contractually obligated to pay to our annuity policyholders. The payments are derived from actuarial models which assume a level interest rate scenario and incorporate assumptions regarding mortality and persistency, when applicable. These assumptions are based on our historical experience.
(2)Period that principal amounts are due is determined by the earliest of the call/put date or the maturity date of each note payable.
(3)Amount shown is net of equity investments in the capital trusts due to the contractual right of offset upon repayment of the notes.
Inflation
Inflation does not have a significant effect on our consolidated balance sheet. We have minimal investments in property, equipment or inventories. To the extent that interest rates may change to reflect inflation or inflation expectations, there would be an effect on our balance sheet and operations. It is not possible to calculate the effect such changes in interest rates, if any, have had on our operating results.
Critical Accounting Policies
The increasing complexity of the business environment and applicable authoritative accounting guidance require us to closely monitor our accounting policies. We have identified six critical accounting policies that are complex and require significant judgment. The following summary of our critical accounting policies is intended to enhance your ability to assess our financial condition and results of operations and the potential volatility due to changes in estimates.
Valuation of Investments
Our fixed maturity securities (bonds and redeemable preferred stocks maturing more than one year after issuance) and equity securities classified as available for sale are reported at fair value. Unrealized gains and losses, if any, on these securities are included directly in stockholders' equity as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), net of income taxes and certain adjustments for assumed changes in amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs and deferred sales inducements. Unrealized gains and losses represent the difference between the amortized cost or cost basis and the fair value of these investments. We use significant judgment within the process used to determine fair value of these investments.
GAAP defines fair value as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability (exit price) in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. We categorize our investments into three levels of fair value hierarchy based on the priority of inputs used in determining fair value. The hierarchy defines the highest priority inputs (Level 1) as quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities. The lowest priority inputs (Level 3) are our own assumptions about what a market participant would use in determining fair value such as estimated future cash flows. In certain cases, the inputs used to measure fair value may fall into different levels of the fair value hierarchy. In such cases, a financial instrument's level within the fair value hierarchy is based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement. Our assessment of the significance of a particular input to the fair value measurement in its entirety requires judgment and considers factors specific to the financial instrument.

We categorize investments recorded at fair value in the consolidated balance sheets as follows:
Level 1 —Quoted prices are available in active markets for identical financial instruments as of the reporting date. We do not adjust the quoted price for these financial instruments, even in situations where we hold a large position and a sale could reasonably impact the quoted price.
Level 2 —Quoted prices in active markets for similar financial instruments, quoted prices for identical or similar financial instruments in markets that are not active; and models and other valuation methodologies using inputs other than quoted prices that are observable.
Level 3 —Models and other valuation methodologies using significant inputs that are unobservable for financial instruments and include situations where there is little, if any, market activity for the financial instrument. The inputs into the determination of fair value require significant management judgment or estimation. Financial instruments that are included in Level 3 are securities for which no market activity or data exists and for which we used discounted expected future cash flows with our own assumptions about what a market participant would use in determining fair value.
The following table presents the fair value of fixed maturity and equity securities, available for sale, by pricing source and hierarchy level as of December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively:
 
Quoted Prices
in Active
Markets for
Identical Assets
(Level 1)
 
Significant
Observable
Inputs
(Level 2)
 
Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
(Level 3)
 Total
 (Dollars in thousands)
December 31, 2016       
Priced via third party pricing services$5,387
 $41,016,054
 $
 $41,021,441
Priced via independent broker quotations
 36,436
 
 36,436
Priced via matrices
 
 
 
Priced via other methods
 10,617
 
 10,617
 $5,387
 $41,063,107
 $
 $41,068,494
% of Total% 100.0% % 100.0%
        
December 31, 2015       
Priced via third party pricing services$438,719
 $35,785,649
 $
 $36,224,368
Priced via independent broker quotations
 164,314
 
 164,314
Priced via matrices
 
 
 
Priced via other methods
 40,985
 
 40,985
 $438,719
 $35,990,948
 $
 $36,429,667
% of Total1.2% 98.8% % 100.0%
Management's assessment of all available data when determining fair value of our investments is necessary to appropriately apply fair value accounting.
We utilize independent pricing services in estimating the fair values of investment securities. The independent pricing services incorporate a variety of observable market data in their valuation techniques, including:
reported trading prices,
benchmark yields,
broker-dealer quotes,
benchmark securities,
bids and offers,
credit ratings,
relative credit information, and
other reference data.
The independent pricing services also take into account perceived market movements and sector news, as well as a security's terms and conditions, including any features specific to that issue that may influence risk and marketability. Depending on the security, the priority of the use of observable market inputs may change as some observable market inputs may not be relevant or additional inputs may be necessary.

The independent pricing services provide quoted market prices when available. Quoted prices are not always available due to market inactivity. When quoted market prices are not available, the third parties use yield data and other factors relating to instruments or securities with similar characteristics to determine fair value for securities that are not actively traded. We generally obtain one value from our primary external pricing service. In situations where a price is not available from this service, we may obtain further quotes or prices from additional parties as needed. In addition, for our callable United States Government sponsored agencies we obtain multiple broker quotes and take the average of the broker prices received. Market indices of similar rated asset class spreads are considered for valuations and broker indications of similar securities are compared. Inputs used by the broker include market information, such as yield data and other factors relating to instruments or securities with similar characteristics. Valuations and quotes obtained from third party commercial pricing services are non-binding and do not represent quotes on which one may execute the disposition of the assets.
We validate external valuations at least quarterly through a combination of procedures that include the evaluation of methodologies used by the pricing services, analytical reviews and performance analysis of the prices against trends, and maintenance of a securities watch list. Additionally, as needed we utilize discounted cash flow models or perform independent valuations on a case-by-case basis using inputs and assumptions similar to those used by the pricing services. Although we do identify differences from time to time as a result of these validation procedures, we did not make any significant adjustments as of December 31, 2016 and 2015.
Evaluation of Other Than Temporary Impairments and Allowance for Loan Loss
The evaluation of investments for other than temporary impairments involves significant judgment and estimates by management. We review and analyze all investments on an ongoing basis for changes in market interest rates and credit deterioration. This review process includes analyzing our ability to recover the amortized cost or cost basis of each investment that has a fair value that is materially lower than its amortized cost and requires a high degree of management judgment and involves uncertainty. The evaluation of securities for other than temporary impairments is a quantitative and qualitative process, which is subject to risks and uncertainties.
We have a policy and process to identify securities that could potentially have an impairment that is other than temporary. This process involves monitoring market events and other items that could impact issuers. The evaluation includes but is not limited to such factors as:
the length of time and the extent to which the fair value has been less than amortized cost or cost;
whether the issuer is current on all payments and all contractual payments have been made as agreed;
the remaining payment terms and the financial condition and near-term prospects of the issuer;
the lack of ability to refinance due to liquidity problems in the credit market;
the fair value of any underlying collateral;
the existence of any credit protection available;
our intent to sell and whether it is more likely than not we would be required to sell prior to recovery for debt securities;
our assessment in the case of equity securities including perpetual preferred stocks with credit deterioration that the security cannot recover to cost in a reasonable period of time;
our intent and ability to retain equity securities for a period of time sufficient to allow for recovery;
consideration of rating agency actions; and
changes in estimated cash flows of mortgage and asset backed securities.
We determine whether other than temporary impairment losses should be recognized for debt and equity securities by assessing all facts and circumstances surrounding each security. Where the decline in fair value of debt securities is attributable to changes in market interest rates or to factors such as market volatility, liquidity and spread widening, and we anticipate recovery of all contractual or expected cash flows, we do not consider these investments to be other than temporarily impaired because we do not intend to sell these investments and it is not more likely than not we will be required to sell these investments before a recovery of amortized cost, which may be maturity. For equity securities, we recognize an impairment charge in the period in which we do not have the intent and ability to hold the securities until recovery of cost or we determine that the security will not recover to book value within a reasonable period of time. We determine what constitutes a reasonable period of time on a security-by-security basis by considering all the evidence available to us, including the magnitude of any unrealized loss and its duration.
Other than temporary impairment losses on equity securities are recognized in operations. If we intend to sell a debt security or if it is more likely than not that we will be required to sell a debt security before recovery of its amortized cost basis, other than temporary impairment has occurred and the difference between amortized cost and fair value will be recognized as a loss in operations.
If we do not intend to sell and it is not more likely than not we will be required to sell the debt security but also do not expect to recover the entire amortized cost basis of the security, an impairment loss would be recognized in operations in the amount of the expected credit loss. We determine the amount of expected credit loss by calculating the present value of the cash flows expected to be collected discounted at each security's acquisition yield based on our consideration of whether the security was of high credit quality at the time of acquisition. The difference between the present value of expected future cash flows and the amortized cost basis of the security is the amount of credit loss recognized in operations. The remaining amount of the other than temporary impairment is recognized in other comprehensive income.

The determination of the credit loss component of a mortgage backed security is based on a number of factors. The primary consideration in this evaluation process is the issuer's ability to meet current and future interest and principal payments as contractually stated at time of purchase. Our review of these securities includes an analysis of the cash flow modeling under various default scenarios considering independent third party benchmarks, the seniority of the specific tranche within the structure of the security, the composition of the collateral and the actual default, loss severity and prepayment experience exhibited. With the input of third party assumptions for default projections, loss severity and prepayment expectations, we evaluate the cash flow projections to determine whether the security is performing in accordance with its contractual obligation.
We utilize the models from a leading structured product software specialist serving institutional investors. These models incorporate each security's seniority and cash flow structure. In circumstances where the analysis implies a potential for principal loss at some point in the future, we use our "best estimate" cash flow projection discounted at the security's effective yield at acquisition to determine the amount of our potential credit loss associated with this security. The discounted expected future cash flows equates to our expected recovery value. Any shortfall of the expected recovery when compared to the amortized cost of the security will be recorded as the credit loss component of an other than temporary impairment.
The cash flow modeling is performed on a security-by-security basis and incorporates actual cash flows on the residential mortgage backed securities through the current period, as well as the projection of remaining cash flows using a number of assumptions including default rates, prepayment rates and loss severity rates. The default curves we use are tailored to the Prime or Alt-A residential mortgage backed securities that we own, which assume lower default rates and loss severity for Prime securities versus Alt-A securities. These default curves are scaled higher or lower depending on factors such as current underlying mortgage loan performance, rating agency loss projections, loan to value ratios, geographic diversity, as well as other appropriate considerations.
The determination of the credit loss component of a corporate bond (including redeemable preferred stocks) is based on the underlying financial performance of the issuer and their ability to meet their contractual obligations. Considerations in our evaluation include, but are not limited to, credit rating changes, financial statement and ratio analysis, changes in management, significant changes in credit spreads, breaches of financial covenants and a review of the economic outlook for the industry and markets in which they trade. In circumstances where an issuer appears unlikely to meet its future obligation, or the security's price decline is deemed other than temporary, an estimate of credit loss is determined. Credit loss is calculated using default probabilities as derived from the credit default swaps markets in conjunction with recovery rates derived from independent third party analysis or a best estimate of credit loss. This credit loss rate is then incorporated into a present value calculation based on an expected principal loss in the future discounted at the yield at the date of purchase and compared to amortized cost to determine the amount of credit loss associated with the security.
In addition, for debt securities which we do not intend to sell and it is not more likely than not we will be required to sell, but our intent changes due to changes or events that could not have been reasonably anticipated, an other than temporary impairment charge is recognized in net income and amortized cost is written down to fair value. Once an impairment charge has been recorded, we then continue to review the other than temporarily impaired securities for appropriate valuation on an ongoing basis. Unrealized losses may be recognized in future periods through a charge to earnings should we later conclude that the decline in fair value below amortized cost is other than temporary pursuant to our accounting policy described above. The use of different methodologies and assumptions to determine the fair value of investments and the timing and amount of impairments may have a material effect on the amounts presented in our consolidated financial statements.
We evaluate our mortgage loan portfolio for the establishment of a loan loss allowance by specific identification of impaired loans and the measurement of an estimated loss for each individual loan identified. A mortgage loan is impaired when it is probable that we will be unable to collect all amounts due according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement. If we determine that the value of any specific mortgage loan is impaired, the carrying amount of the mortgage loan will be reduced to its fair value, based upon the present value of expected future cash flows from the loan discounted at the loan's effective interest rate, or the fair value of the underlying collateral less estimated costs to sell.
In addition, we analyze the mortgage loan portfolio for the need of a general loan allowance for probable losses on all other loans on a quantitative and qualitative basis. The amount of the general loan allowance is based upon management's evaluation of the collectability of the loan portfolio, historical loss experience, delinquencies, credit concentrations, underwriting standards and national and local economic conditions.
We rate each of the mortgage loans in our portfolio based on factors such as historical operating performance, loan to value ratio and economic outlook, among others. We calculate a loss factor to apply to each rating based on historical losses we have recognized in our mortgage loan portfolio. We apply the loss factors to the total principal outstanding within each rating category to determine an appropriate estimate of the general loan loss allowance. We also assess the portfolio quantitatively and apply a loss rate to all loans without a specific allowance based on management's assessment of economic conditions, and we apply an additional amount of loss allowance to a group of loans that we have identified as having higher risk of loss.
Policy Liabilities for Fixed Index Annuities
We offer a variety of fixed index annuities with crediting strategies linked to the S&P 500 Index and other equity and bond market indices. We purchase call options on the applicable indices as an investment to provide the income needed to fund the annual index credits on the index products. See Financial Condition—Derivative Instruments. Certain derivative instruments embedded in the fixed index annuity contracts are recognized in the consolidated balance sheet at their fair values and changes in fair value are recognized immediately in our consolidated statements of operations in accordance with accounting standards for derivative instruments and hedging activities.
Accounting for derivatives prescribes that the contractual obligations for future annual index credits are treated as a "series of embedded derivatives" over the expected life of the applicable contracts. Policy liabilities for fixed index annuities are equal to the sum of the "host" (or guaranteed) component and the embedded derivative component for each fixed index annuity policy. The host value is established at inception of the contract and accreted over the policy's life at a constant rate of interest. We estimate the fair value of the embedded derivative component at each valuation date by (i) projecting policy contract values and minimum guaranteed contract values over the expected lives of the contracts and (ii) discounting the excess of the projected contract value amounts at the applicable risk free interest rates adjusted for our nonperformance risk related to those liabilities. The projections of policy contract values are based on our best estimate assumptions for future policy growth and future policy decrements. Our best estimate assumptions for future policy growth include assumptions for the expected index credits on the next policy anniversary date which are derived from the fair values of the underlying call options purchased to fund such index credits and the expected costs of annual call options we will purchase in the future to fund index credits beyond the next policy anniversary. The projections of minimum guaranteed contract values include the same best estimate assumptions for policy decrements as were used to project policy contract values. The amounts reported in the consolidated statements of operations as "Interest sensitive and index product benefits" represent amounts credited to policy liabilities pursuant to accounting by insurance companies for certain long-duration contracts which include index credits through the most recent policy anniversary. The amounts reported in the consolidated statements of operations as "Changes in fair value of embedded derivatives" equal the change in the difference between policy benefit reserves for fixed index annuities computed under the derivative accounting standard and the long-duration contracts accounting standard at each balance sheet date.
In general, the change in the fair value of the embedded derivatives will not correspond to the change in fair value of the purchased call options because the purchased call options are one year options while the options valued in the embedded derivatives represent the rights of the contract holder to receive index credits over the entire period the fixed index annuities are expected to be in force, which typically exceeds 10 years.
The most sensitive assumption in determining policy liabilities for fixed index annuities is the rates used to discount the excess projected contract values. As indicated above, the discount rate reflects our nonperformance risk. If the discount rates used to discount the excess projected contract values at December 31, 2016 were to increase by 100 basis points, our reserves for fixed index annuities would decrease by $451.4 million recorded through operations as a decrease in the change in fair value of embedded derivatives and there would be a corresponding decrease of $276.4 million to our combined balance for deferred policy acquisition costs and deferred sales inducements recorded through operations as an increase in amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs and deferred sales inducements. A decrease by 100 basis points in the discount rate used to discount the excess projected contract values would increase our reserves for fixed index annuities by $504.5 million recorded through operations as an increase in the change in fair value of embedded derivatives and increase our combined balance for deferred policy acquisition costs and deferred sales inducements by $299.5 million recorded through operations as a decrease in amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs and deferred sales inducements.
Liability for Lifetime Income Benefit Riders
Beginning in July 2007, substantially all of our fixed index annuity policies and many of our annual reset fixed rate deferred annuities were issued with a lifetime income benefit rider.
The liability for lifetime income benefit riders is based on estimates of the value of benefit payments expected to be paid in excess of projected policy values recognizing the excess over the expected lives of the underlying policies based on actual and expected assessments including spreads and product charges and fees. The inputs used in the calculation of the liability for lifetime income benefit riders include actual policy values, actual income account values, actual payout factors, actual roll-up rates and our best estimate assumptions for future policy growth, future policy decrements, the ages at which policyholders are expected to elect to begin to receive lifetime income benefit payments, the percentage of policyholders who elect to receive lifetime income benefit payments and the type of income benefit payments selected upon election. The assumptions are reviewed quarterly and revisions to the assumptions are made based on historical results and our best estimates of future experience. The liability for lifetime income benefit riders is included in policy benefit reserves in the consolidated balance sheets and the change in the liability is included in interest sensitive and index product benefits in the consolidated statements of operations. See Results of Operations for the Three Years Ended December 31, 2016 in this Item 7. for a discussion and presentation of the actual effects of assumption revisions.
Deferred Policy Acquisition Costs and Deferred Sales Inducements
Costs relating to the successful production of new business are not expensed when incurred but instead are capitalized as deferred policy acquisition costs or deferred sales inducements. Only costs which are expected to be recovered from future policy revenues and gross profits may be deferred.
Deferred policy acquisition costs and deferred sales inducements are subject to loss recognition testing on a quarterly basis or when an event occurs that may warrant loss recognition. Deferred policy acquisition costs consist principally of commissions and certain costs of policy issuance. Deferred sales inducements consist of premium and interest bonuses credited to policyholder account balances.

For annuity products, these costs are being amortized generally in proportion to expected gross profits from investment spreads, including the cost of hedging the fixed indexed annuity obligations, and, to a lesser extent, from product charges net of expected excess payments for lifetime income benefit riders, and mortality and expense margins. Current and future period gross profits/margins for fixed index annuities also include the impact of amounts recorded for the change in fair value of derivatives and the change in fair value of embedded derivatives. Current period amortization is adjusted retrospectively through an unlocking process when estimates of current or future gross profits/margins (including the impact of realized investment gains and losses) to be realized from a group of products are revised. Our estimates of future gross profits/margins are based on actuarial assumptions related to the underlying policies terms, lives of the policies, yield on investments supporting the liabilities and level of expenses necessary to maintain the polices over their entire lives. Revisions are made based on historical results and our best estimates of future experience. See Results of Operations for the Three Years Ended December 31, 2016 in this Item 7. for a discussion and presentation of the actual effects of unlocking.
Estimated future gross profits vary based on a number of sources including investment spread margins, surrender charge income, policy persistency, policy administrative expenses and realized gains and losses on investments including credit related other than temporary impairment losses. Estimated future gross profits are most sensitive to changes in investment spread margins which are the most significant component of gross profits. If estimated gross profits for all future years on business in force at December 31, 2016 were to increase by 10%, our combined balance for deferred policy acquisition costs and deferred sales inducements at December 31, 2016 would increase by $182.2 million recorded through operations as a decrease to amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs and deferred sales inducements. Correspondingly, a 10% decrease in estimated gross profits for all future years would result in a $202.7 million decrease in the combined December 31, 2016 balances recorded through operations as an increase to amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs and deferred sales inducements.
Deferred Income Taxes
We account for income taxes using the liability method. This method provides for the tax effects of transactions reported in the audited consolidated financial statements for both taxes currently due and deferred. Deferred income taxes reflect the impact of temporary differences between the amount of assets and liabilities recognized for financial reporting purposes and such amounts recognized for tax purposes. A temporary difference is a transaction, or amount of a transaction, that is recognized currently for financial reporting purposes but will not be recognized for tax purposes until a future tax period, or is recognized currently for tax purposes but will not be recognized for financial reporting purposes until a future reporting period. Deferred income taxes are measured by applying enacted tax rates for the years in which the temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled to the amount of each temporary difference.
The realization of deferred income tax assets is primarily based upon management's estimates of future taxable income. Valuation allowances are established when management estimates, based on available information, that it is more likely than not that deferred income tax assets will not be realized. Significant judgment is required in determining whether valuation allowances should be established, as well as the amount of such allowances. When making such determination, consideration is given to, among other things, the following:
future taxable income of the necessary character exclusive of reversing temporary differences and carryforwards;
future reversals of existing taxable temporary differences;
taxable income in prior carryback years; and
tax planning strategies.
Actual realization of deferred income tax assets and liabilities may materially differ from these estimates as a result of changes in tax laws as well as unanticipated future transactions impacting related income tax balances.
The realization of deferred income tax assets related to unrealized losses on our available for sale fixed maturity securities is also based upon our intent to hold these securities for a period of time sufficient to allow for a recovery in fair value and not realize the unrealized loss.
New Accounting Pronouncements
See Note 1 to our audited consolidated financial statements in this Form 10-K beginning on page F-9, which is incorporated by reference in this Item 7, for new accounting pronouncement disclosures.
Item 7A.    Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
We seek to invest our available funds in a manner that will maximize shareholder value and fund future obligations to policyholders and debtors, subject to appropriate risk considerations. We seek to meet this objective through investments that: (i) consist substantially of investment grade fixed maturity securities, (ii) have projected returns which satisfy our spread targets and (iii) have characteristics which support the underlying liabilities. Many of our products incorporate surrender charges, market interest rate adjustments or other features to encourage persistency.
We seek to maximize the total return on our available for sale investments through active investment management. Accordingly, we have determined that our available for sale portfolio of fixed maturity securities is available to be sold in response to: (i) changes in market interest rates; (ii) changes in relative values of individual securities and asset sectors; (iii) changes in prepayment risks; (iv) changes in credit quality outlook for certain securities; (v) liquidity needs; and (vi) other factors.

Interest rate risk is our primary market risk exposure. Substantial and sustained increases and decreases in market interest rates can affect the profitability of our products, the fair value of our investments and the amount of interest we pay on our floating rate term loan and subordinated debentures. See Note 9 to our consolidated financial statements, which is incorporated by reference to this Item 7A, for information regarding the floating interest rate on our term loan. Our floating rate trust preferred securities bear interest at the three month LIBOR plus 3.50% - 4.00%. Our outstanding balance of floating rate trust preferred securities was $164.5 million at December 31, 2016, of which $85.5 million has been swapped to a fixed rate which began in March 2014 and $79.0 million has been capped for a term of seven years which began in July 2014 (See Note 5 to our consolidated financial statements in this Form 10-K). The profitability of most of our products depends on the spreads between interest yield on investments and rates credited on insurance liabilities. We have the ability to adjust crediting rates (caps, participation rates or asset fee rates for fixed index annuities) on substantially all of our annuity liabilities at least annually (subject to minimum guaranteed values). In addition, substantially all of our annuity products have surrender and withdrawal penalty provisions designed to encourage persistency and to help ensure targeted spreads are earned. However, competitive factors, including the impact of the level of surrenders and withdrawals, may limit our ability to adjust or maintain crediting rates at levels necessary to avoid narrowing of spreads under certain market conditions.
A major component of our interest rate risk management program is structuring the investment portfolio with cash flow characteristics consistent with the cash flow characteristics of our insurance liabilities. We use models to simulate cash flows expected from our existing business under various interest rate scenarios. These simulations enable us to measure the potential gain or loss in fair value of our interest rate-sensitive financial instruments, to evaluate the adequacy of expected cash flows from our assets to meet the expected cash requirements of our liabilities and to determine if it is necessary to lengthen or shorten the average life and duration of our investment portfolio. The "duration" of a security is the time weighted present value of the security's expected cash flows and is used to measure a security's sensitivity to changes in interest rates. When the durations of assets and liabilities are similar, exposure to interest rate risk is minimized because a change in value of assets should be largely offset by a change in the value of liabilities.
If interest rates were to increase 10% (31 basis points) from levels at December 31, 2016, we estimate that the fair value of our fixed maturity securities would decrease by approximately $1.0 billion. The impact on stockholders' equity of such decrease (net of income taxes and certain adjustments for changes in amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs and deferred sales inducements) would be a decrease of $291.7 million in accumulated other comprehensive income and a decrease in stockholders' equity. The models used to estimate the impact of a 10% change in market interest rates incorporate numerous assumptions, require significant estimates and assume an immediate and parallel change in interest rates without any management of the investment portfolio in reaction to such change. Consequently, potential changes in value of our financial instruments indicated by the simulations will likely be different from the actual changes experienced under given interest rate scenarios, and the differences may be material. Because we actively manage our investments and liabilities, our net exposure to interest rates can vary over time. However, any such decreases in the fair value of our fixed maturity securities (unless related to credit concerns of the issuer requiring recognition of an other than temporary impairment) would generally be realized only if we were required to sell such securities at losses prior to their maturity to meet our liquidity needs, which we manage using the surrender and withdrawal provisions of our annuity contracts and through other means. See Financial Condition—Liquidity for Insurance Operations for a further discussion of the liquidity risk.
At December 31, 2016, 35% of our fixed income securities have call features, of which 0.1% ($55.7 million) were subject to call redemption. Another 3.1% ($1.3 billion) will become subject to call redemption during 2017. Approximately 70% of our fixed income securities that have call features are not callable until within six months of their stated maturities. During the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, we received $1.2 billion and $0.7 billion, respectively, in net redemption proceeds related to the exercise of such call options. We have reinvestment risk related to these redemptions to the extent we cannot reinvest the net proceeds in assets with credit quality and yield characteristics similar to the redeemed bonds. Such reinvestment risk typically occurs in a declining rate environment. Should rates decline to levels which tighten the spread between our average portfolio yield and average cost of interest credited on annuity liabilities, we have the ability to reduce crediting rates (caps, participation rates or asset fees for index annuities) on most of our annuity liabilities to maintain the spread at our targeted level. At December 31, 2016, approximately 98% of our annuity liabilities were subject to annual adjustment of the applicable crediting rates at our discretion, limited by minimum guaranteed crediting rates specified in the policies.
We purchase call options on the applicable indices to fund the annual index credits on our fixed index annuities. These options are primarily one-year instruments purchased to match the funding requirements of the underlying policies. Fair value changes associated with those investments are substantially offset by an increase or decrease in the amounts added to policyholder account balances for fixed index products. The difference between proceeds received at expiration of these options and index credits, as shown in the following table, is primarily due to over-hedging as a result of policyholder behavior being different than our expectations.
 Year Ended December 31,
 2016 2015 2014
 (Dollars in thousands)
Annual index credits to policyholders on their anniversaries$267,995
 $587,705
 $1,096,504
Proceeds received at expiration of options related to such credits272,277
 602,436
 1,103,710
On the anniversary dates of the index policies, we purchase new one-year call options to fund the next annual index credits. The risk associated with these prospective purchases is the uncertainty of the cost, which will determine whether we are able to earn our spread on our index business. We manage this risk through the terms of our fixed index annuities, which permit us to change caps, participation rates and asset fees, subject to contractual features. By modifying caps, participation rates or asset fees, we can limit option costs to budgeted amounts, except in cases where the contractual features would prevent further modifications. Based upon actuarial testing which we conduct as a part of the design of our index products and on an ongoing basis, we believe the risk that contractual features would prevent us from controlling option costs is not material.

Item 8.    Consolidated Financial Statements and Supplementary Data
The audited consolidated financial statements are included as a part of this report on Form 10-K on pages F-1 through F-54.

Item 9.    Changes in and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure
None.

Item 9A.    Controls and Procedures
(a)Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures.
In accordance with the Securities Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e), our management, under the supervision of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K. Based on that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of December 31, 2016.
(b)Management's Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting.
The management of the Company is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting, as defined in the Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f). Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
The Company's management assessed the effectiveness of the Company's internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2016 based upon criteria established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Based on the assessment, management has determined that we maintained effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2016.
The Company's independent registered public accounting firm, KPMG LLP, who audited the consolidated financial statements included in this annual report on Form 10-K, has issued an attestation report on the effectiveness of management's internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2016. This report appears on page F-2 of this annual report on Form 10-K.
(c)Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting.
Other than the remediation described below, there were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the quarter ended December 31, 2016, that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
(d) Remediation of the Material Weakness in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting.
A material weakness is defined as a deficiency, or a combination of deficiencies, in internal control over financial reporting, such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of a company's annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis. As previously reported, we did not have adequate controls designed and in place to ensure that we correctly implemented changes made to the calculation of lifetime income benefit reserves in the third quarter of 2015. Specifically, the design of our control relating to the review of the implementation of code changes to reflect revised assumptions and the impact of those changes (the “review control”) on the lifetime income benefit reserves was not modified given the complex nature and volume of code changes we made as part of the third quarter review. As a result, we failed to identify an immaterial after-tax calculation error. This amount was corrected in the fourth quarter of 2015 prior to issuing our consolidated financial statements. The control deficiency related to the lifetime income benefit reserves created a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement to the consolidated financial statements would not be prevented or detected on a timely basis and therefore we concluded that the deficiency represented a material weakness in the Company's internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2015.
With the oversight of our audit committee, we took corrective steps during 2016 to remediate the underlying causes of the material weakness. The corrective steps we have taken, which are intended to ensure that code changes to the lifetime income benefit reserves calculation function as intended, are:
- The “review control” over the implementation of code changes to our lifetime income benefit reserves was enhanced to ensure that all code changes are reviewed by an individual who is not responsible for the implementation of the code changes.
- The scope of the “review control” over the implementation of code changes to our lifetime income benefit reserves was expanded to include detailed testing of our lifetime income benefit reserves calculation to ensure any code changes are implemented accurately.
The enhanced “review control” as described above was implemented during the fourth quarter of 2015. During the fourth quarter of 2016 and prior to the issuance of our consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2016, we completed sufficient instances of

testing of the operating effectiveness of the enhanced “review control” and concluded that the above identified material weakness in our internal controls over financial reporting has been fully remediated.

Item 9B.    Other Information
There is no information required to be disclosed on Form 8-K for the quarter ended December 31, 2016 which has not been previously reported.

PART III
The information required by Part III is incorporated by reference from our definitive proxy statement for our annual meeting of shareholders to be held June 1, 2017 to be filed with the Commission pursuant to Regulation 14A within 120 days after December 31, 2016.
PART IV

Item 15.    Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules
Financial Statements and Financial Statement Schedules.    See Index to Consolidated Financial Statements and Schedules on page F-1 for a list of financial statements and financial statement schedules included in this report.
All other schedules to the audited consolidated financial statements required by Article 7 of Regulation S-X are omitted because they are not applicable, not required, or because the information is included elsewhere in the audited consolidated financial statements or notes thereto.
Exhibits.    See Exhibit Index immediately preceding the Exhibits for a list of Exhibits filed with this report.

SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized, this 27th day of February 2017.
AMERICAN EQUITY INVESTMENT LIFE HOLDING COMPANY
By:/s/ JOHN M. MATOVINA
John M. Matovina,
Chief Executive Officer and President
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this registration statement has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated:
SignatureTitle (Capacity)Date
/s/ JOHN M. MATOVINA
Chief Executive Officer, President and Director
(Principal Executive Officer)
February 27, 2017
John M. Matovina
/s/ TED M. JOHNSON
Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
(Principal Financial Officer)
February 27, 2017
Ted M. Johnson
/s/ SCOTT A. SAMUELSON
Vice President—Controller
(Principal Accounting Officer)
February 27, 2017
Scott A. Samuelson
/s/ D.J. NOBLEChairman of the Board and DirectorFebruary 27, 2017
D.J. Noble
/s/ JOYCE A. CHAPMANDirectorFebruary 27, 2017
Joyce A. Chapman
/s/ ALEXANDER M. CLARKDirectorFebruary 27, 2017
Alexander M. Clark
/s/ JAMES M. GERLACHDirectorFebruary 27, 2017
James M. Gerlach
/s/ ROBERT L. HOWEDirectorFebruary 27, 2017
Robert L. Howe
/s/ WILLIAM R. KUNKELDirectorFebruary 27, 2017
William R. Kunkel
/s/ ALAN D. MATULADirectorFebruary 27, 2017
Alan D. Matula
/s/ DAVID S. MULCAHYDirectorFebruary 27, 2017
David S. Mulcahy
/s/ GERARD D. NEUGENTDirectorFebruary 27, 2017
Gerard D. Neugent
/s/ DEBRA J. RICHARDSONDirectorFebruary 27, 2017
Debra J. Richardson
/s/ A.J. STRICKLAND, IIIDirectorFebruary 27, 2017
A.J. Strickland, III

AMERICAN EQUITY INVESTMENT LIFE HOLDING COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SCHEDULES
YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014
Consolidated Financial Statements:
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Schedules:





Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
The Board of Directors and Stockholders
American Equity Investment Life Holding Company:
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of American Equity Investment Life Holding Company and subsidiaries (the Company) as of December 31, 2016 and 2015, and the related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive income (loss), changes in stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2016. In connection with our audits of the consolidated financial statements, we also have audited the financial statement schedules listed in the Index on page F-1. We also have audited the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2016, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). The Company’s management is responsible for these consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedules, for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting, and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedules and an opinion on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement and whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audits of the consolidated financial statements included examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. Our audit of internal control over financial reporting included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audits also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinions.
A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the American Equity Investment Life Holding Company and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2016 and 2015, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2016, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. Also in our opinion, the related financial statement schedules, when considered in relation to the basic consolidated financial statements taken as a whole, present fairly, in all material respects, the information set forth therein. Also in our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2016, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).
/s/ KPMG LLP
Des Moines, Iowa
February 27, 2017


AMERICAN EQUITY INVESTMENT LIFE HOLDING COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(Dollars in thousands, except share and per share data)

 December 31,
 2016 2015
Assets   
Investments:   
Fixed maturity securities:   
Available for sale, at fair value (amortized cost: 2016 - $39,953,955; 2015 - $35,823,710)$41,060,494
 $36,421,839
Held for investment, at amortized cost (fair value: 2016 - $68,766; 2015 - $65,377)76,825
 76,622
Mortgage loans on real estate2,480,956
 2,435,257
Derivative instruments830,519
 337,256
Other investments308,774
 299,358
Total investments44,757,568
 39,570,332
    
Cash and cash equivalents791,266
 397,749
Coinsurance deposits4,639,492
 3,187,470
Accrued investment income397,773
 362,104
Deferred policy acquisition costs2,905,377
 2,905,136
Deferred sales inducements2,208,218
 2,232,148
Deferred income taxes168,578
 232,683
Income taxes recoverable11,474
 29,599
Other assets173,726
 112,171
Total assets$56,053,472
 $49,029,392
    
Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity   
Liabilities:   
Policy benefit reserves$51,637,026
 $45,495,431
Other policy funds and contract claims298,347
 324,850
Notes and loan payable493,755
 393,227
Subordinated debentures241,853
 241,452
Other liabilities1,090,896
 629,897
Total liabilities53,761,877
 47,084,857
    
Stockholders' equity:   
Preferred stock, par value $1 per share, 2,000,000 shares authorized,
2016 and 2015 - no shares issued and outstanding

 
Common stock, par value $1 per share, 200,000,000 shares authorized; issued and outstanding:
2016 - 88,001,130 shares (excluding 2,887,082 treasury shares);
2015 - 81,354,079 shares (excluding 3,448,750 treasury shares)
88,001
 81,354
Additional paid-in capital770,344
 630,367
Accumulated other comprehensive income339,966
 201,663
Retained earnings1,093,284
 1,031,151
Total stockholders' equity2,291,595
 1,944,535
Total liabilities and stockholders' equity$56,053,472
 $49,029,392
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.


AMERICAN EQUITY INVESTMENT LIFE HOLDING COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)


 Year Ended December 31,
 2016 2015 2014
Revenues:     
Premiums and other considerations$43,767
 $36,048
 $32,623
Annuity product charges173,579
 136,168
 118,990
Net investment income1,849,872
 1,692,192
 1,531,667
Change in fair value of derivatives164,219
 (336,146) 504,825
Net realized gains (losses) on investments, excluding other than temporary
impairment ("OTTI") losses
11,524
 10,211
 (4,003)
OTTI losses on investments:     
Total OTTI losses(21,349) (25,547) 
Portion of OTTI losses recognized in (from) other comprehensive income(1,330) 6,011
 (2,627)
Net OTTI losses recognized in operations(22,679) (19,536) (2,627)
Loss on extinguishment of debt
 
 (12,502)
Total revenues2,220,282
 1,518,937
 2,168,973
      
Benefits and expenses:     
Insurance policy benefits and change in future policy benefits52,483
 45,458
 41,815
Interest sensitive and index product benefits725,472
 968,053
 1,473,700
Amortization of deferred sales inducements251,166
 209,390
 131,419
Change in fair value of embedded derivatives543,465
 (464,698) 32,321
Interest expense on notes and loan payable28,248
 28,849
 36,370
Interest expense on subordinated debentures12,958
 12,239
 12,122
Amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs374,012
 286,114
 163,578
Other operating costs and expenses102,231
 96,218
 81,584
Total benefits and expenses2,090,035
 1,181,623
 1,972,909
Income before income taxes130,247
 337,314
 196,064
Income tax expense47,004
 117,484
 70,041
Net income$83,243
 $219,830
 $126,023
      
Earnings per common share$0.98
 $2.78
 $1.69
Earnings per common share - assuming dilution$0.97
 $2.72
 $1.58
Weighted average common shares outstanding (in thousands):     
Earnings per common share84,793
 78,937
 74,431
Earnings per common share - assuming dilution85,605
 80,961
 79,894
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

AMERICAN EQUITY INVESTMENT LIFE HOLDING COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)
(Dollars in thousands)

 Year Ended December 31,
 2016 2015 2014
Net income$83,243
 $219,830
 $126,023
Other comprehensive income (loss):     
Change in net unrealized investment gains/losses (1)207,994
 (797,374) 1,038,604
Noncredit component of OTTI losses (1)556
 (2,927) 1,265
Reclassification of unrealized investment gains/losses to net income (1)4,224
 703
 (1,092)
Other comprehensive income (loss) before income tax212,774
 (799,598) 1,038,777
Income tax effect related to other comprehensive income (loss)(74,471) 279,860
 (363,572)
Other comprehensive income (loss)138,303
 (519,738) 675,205
Comprehensive income (loss)$221,546
 $(299,908) $801,228
(1)Net of related adjustments to amortization of deferred sales inducements and deferred policy acquisition costs.
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.



AMERICAN EQUITY INVESTMENT LIFE HOLDING COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)


 
Common
Stock
 
Additional
Paid-in
Capital
 
Unallocated
Common
Stock Held
by ESOP
 
Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Income
 
Retained
Earnings
 
Total
Stockholders'
Equity
Balance at December 31, 2013$70,535
 $550,400
 $(631) $46,196
 $718,187
 $1,384,687
Net income for the year
 
 
 
 126,023
 126,023
Other comprehensive income
 
 
 675,205
 
 675,205
Allocation of 58,618 shares of common stock by ESOP, including excess income tax benefits
 721
 631
 
 
 1,352
Share-based compensation, including excess income tax benefits
 7,705
 
 
 
 7,705
Issuance of 1,567,607 shares of common stock under compensation plans, including excess income tax benefits1,568
 13,137
 
 
 
 14,705
Extinguishment of convertible senior notes, net of tax, including 3,959,396 shares of common stock issued upon conversion3,959
 (7,488) 
 
 
 (3,529)
Warrants reclassified to embedded derivative liability to be settled in cash
 (51,257) 
 
 
 (51,257)
Dividends on common stock ($0.20 per share)
 
 
 
 (15,015) (15,015)
Balance at December 31, 201476,062
 513,218
 
 721,401
 829,195
 2,139,876
Net income for the year
 
 
 
 219,830
 219,830
Other comprehensive loss
 
 
 (519,738) 
 (519,738)
Share-based compensation, including excess income tax benefits
 9,976
 
 
 
 9,976
Issuance of common stock via public offering4,300
 100,179
 
 
 
 104,479
Issuance of 944,504 shares of common stock under compensation plans, including excess income tax benefits944
 7,042
 
 
 
 7,986
Issuance of 47,868 shares of common stock to settle warrants that have reached their expiration48
 (48) 
 
 
 
Dividends on common stock ($0.22 per share)
 
 
 
 (17,874) (17,874)
Balance at December 31, 201581,354
 630,367
 
 201,663
 1,031,151
 1,944,535
Net income for the year
 
 
 
 83,243
 83,243
Other comprehensive income
 
 
 138,303
 
 138,303
Share-based compensation, including excess income tax benefits
 7,218
 
 
 
 7,218
Issuance of common stock via settlement of forward sale agreements5,590
 129,072
 
 
 
 134,662
Issuance of 964,053 shares of common stock under compensation plans, including excess income tax benefits964
 3,781
 
 
 
 4,745
Issuance of 92,998 shares of common stock to settle warrants that have reached their expiration93
 (94) 
 
 
 (1)
Dividends on common stock ($0.24 per share)
 
 
 
 (21,110) (21,110)
Balance at December 31, 2016$88,001
 $770,344
 $
 $339,966
 $1,093,284
 $2,291,595
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

AMERICAN EQUITY INVESTMENT LIFE HOLDING COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Dollars in thousands)

 Year Ended December 31,
 2016 2015 2014
Operating activities     
Net income$83,243
 $219,830
 $126,023
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:     
Interest sensitive and index product benefits725,472
 968,053
 1,473,700
Amortization of deferred sales inducements251,166
 209,390
 131,419
Annuity product charges(173,579) (136,168) (118,990)
Change in fair value of embedded derivatives543,465
 (464,698) 32,321
Increase in traditional life and accident and health insurance reserves12,724
 5,097
 2,385
Policy acquisition costs deferred(543,325) (657,639) (426,882)
Amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs374,012
 286,114
 163,578
Provision for depreciation and other amortization3,879
 4,610
 9,490
Amortization of discounts and premiums on investments1,070
 (8,464) (14,960)
Loss on extinguishment of debt
 
 12,502
Realized gains (losses) on investments and net OTTI losses recognized in operations11,155
 9,325
 6,630
Change in fair value of derivatives(165,727) 334,300
 (506,328)
Deferred income taxes (benefits)(10,408) 41,916
 (46,504)
Share-based compensation6,692
 7,373
 3,544
Change in accrued investment income(35,669) (35,545) (24,918)
Change in income taxes recoverable/payable18,125
 (20,027) (19,405)
Change in other assets1,812
 71
 (2,771)
Change in other policy funds and contract claims(34,411) (49,092) (60,931)
Change in collateral held for derivatives414,655
 (269,474) 27,839
Change in other liabilities(55,940) 75,794
 (51,008)
Other(14,089) (15,962) (8,948)
Net cash provided by operating activities1,414,322
 504,804
 707,786
      
Investing activities     
Sales, maturities, or repayments of investments:     
Fixed maturity securities—available for sale2,746,510
 1,612,121
 1,490,906
Mortgage loans on real estate383,763
 468,102
 453,937
Derivative instruments284,470
 640,467
 1,169,874
Other investments14,045
 16,792
 23,165
Acquisitions of investments:     
Fixed maturity securities—available for sale(6,883,895) (7,256,137) (5,191,781)
Mortgage loans on real estate(428,833) (455,286) (327,654)
Derivative instruments(602,349) (588,859) (492,296)
Other investments(11,559) (13,092) (72,548)
Purchases of property, furniture and equipment(1,197) (1,313) (1,352)
Net cash used in investing activities(4,499,045) (5,577,205) (2,947,749)

AMERICAN EQUITY INVESTMENT LIFE HOLDING COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (Continued)
(Dollars in thousands)

 Year Ended December 31,
 2016 2015 2014
Financing activities     
Receipts credited to annuity and single premium universal life policyholder account balances$7,092,348
 $7,051,227
 $4,160,005
Coinsurance deposits(1,317,555) (80,777) 109,184
Return of annuity policyholder account balances(2,535,669) (2,271,950) (2,025,203)
Financing fees incurred and deferred(1,456) 
 (100)
Repayment of notes payable
 (48,152) (219,094)
Proceeds from issuance of debt100,000
 
 
Net proceeds from settlement of notes hedges and warrants
 25,775
 16,558
Acquisition of common stock
 (16) 
Excess tax benefits realized from share-based compensation plans527
 3,649
 5,184
Proceeds from issuance of common stock139,654
 112,481
 13,681
Change in checks in excess of cash balance21,501
 (5,727) (1,252)
Dividends paid(21,110) (17,874) (15,015)
Net cash provided by financing activities3,478,240
 4,768,636
 2,043,948
Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents393,517
 (303,765) (196,015)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year397,749
 701,514
 897,529
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year$791,266
 $397,749
 $701,514
      
Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information     
Cash paid during the year for:     
Interest expense$39,647
 $39,118
 $42,989
Income taxes39,066
 91,887
 132,754
Non-cash operating activity:     
Deferral of sales inducements353,966
 486,924
 330,079
Non-cash investing activity:     
Real estate acquired in satisfaction of mortgage loans
 
 14,555
Mortgage loan on real estate sold
 4,879
 
Non-cash financing activity:     
Common stock issued in extinguishment of debt
 
 95,993
Common stock issued to settle warrants that have expired93
 48
 
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.


AMERICAN EQUITY INVESTMENT LIFE HOLDING COMPANY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
1.     Significant Accounting Policies
Nature of Operations
American Equity Investment Life Holding Company ("we", "us", "our" or "parent company"), through its wholly-owned subsidiaries, American Equity Investment Life Insurance Company ("American Equity Life"), American Equity Investment Life Insurance Company of New York ("American Equity Life of New York") and Eagle Life Insurance Company ("Eagle Life"), is licensed to sell insurance products in 50 states and the District of Columbia at December 31, 2016. We operate solely in the insurance business.
We primarily market fixed index and fixed rate annuities and to a lesser extent, life insurance. Premiums and annuity deposits (net of coinsurance) collected in 2016, 2015 and 2014, by product type were as follows:
  Year Ended December 31,
Product Type 2016 2015 2014
  (Dollars in thousands)
Fixed index annuities $5,035,818
 $6,491,981
 $3,911,109
Annual reset fixed rate annuities 63,582
 44,715
 56,647
Multi-year fixed rate annuities 256,894
 42,709
 21,125
Single premium immediate annuities (SPIA) 35,851
 32,752
 24,580
Life insurance 9,946
 10,917
 10,810
  $5,402,091
 $6,623,074
 $4,024,271
Agents contracted with us through two national marketing organizations accounted for more than 10% of the annuity deposits and insurance premium collections during 2016 by American Equity Life representing 19% and 10%, individually, of the annuity deposits and insurance premiums collected by American Equity Life. Agents contracted with us through one national marketing organization accounted for more than 10% of the annuity deposits and insurance premium collections during 2015 by American Equity Life, representing 24% of the annuity deposits and insurance premiums collected by American Equity Life. Agents contracted with us through two national marketing organizations accounted for more than 10% of the annuity deposits and insurance premium collections during 2014 by American Equity Life, each representing 10% individually, of the annuity deposits and insurance premiums collected by American Equity Life.
Consolidation and Basis of Presentation
The consolidated financial statements include our accounts and our wholly-owned subsidiaries: American Equity Life, American Equity Life of New York, Eagle Life, AERL, L.C., American Equity Capital, Inc., American Equity Investment Properties, L.C., American Equity Advisors, Inc. and American Equity Investment Service Company. All significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated.
Estimates and Assumptions
The preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles ("GAAP") requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Significant estimates and assumptions are utilized in the calculation of deferred policy acquisition costs, deferred sales inducements, policy benefit reserves, valuation of derivatives, including embedded derivatives on index annuity reserves, contingent convertible senior notes, valuation of investments, other than temporary impairment of investments, allowances for loan losses on mortgage loans and valuation allowances on deferred tax assets. A description of each critical estimate is incorporated within the discussion of the related accounting policies which follow. It is reasonably possible that actual experience could differ from the estimates and assumptions utilized.
Investments
Fixed maturity securities (bonds and redeemable preferred stocks maturing more than one year after issuance) that may be sold prior to maturity are classified as available for sale. Available for sale securities are reported at fair value and unrealized gains and losses, if any, on these securities are included directly in a separate component of stockholders' equity, net of income taxes and certain adjustments for assumed changes in amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs and deferred sales inducements. Fair values, as reported herein, of fixed maturity and equity securities are based on quoted market prices in active markets when available, or for those fixed maturity securities not actively traded, yield data and other factors relating to instruments or securities with similar characteristics are used. See Note 2 for more information on the determination of fair value. Premiums and discounts are amortized/accrued using methods which result in a constant yield over the securities' expected lives. Amortization/accrual of premiums and discounts on residential and commercial mortgage backed securities incorporate prepayment assumptions to estimate the securities' expected lives. Interest income is recognized as earned.

F-9

Table of Contents
AMERICAN EQUITY INVESTMENT LIFE HOLDING COMPANY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)


Fixed maturity securities that we have the positive intent and ability to hold to maturity are classified as held for investment. Such securities may, at times, be called prior to maturity. Held for investment securities are reported at cost adjusted for amortization of premiums and discounts. Changes in the fair value of these securities, except for declines that are other than temporary, are not reflected in our consolidated financial statements.
The carrying amounts of our impaired investments in fixed maturity and equity securities are adjusted for declines in value that are other than temporary. Other than temporary impairment losses are reported as a component of revenues in the consolidated statements of operations, which presents the amount of noncredit impairment losses for certain fixed maturity securities that is reported in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss). See Note 3 for further discussion of other than temporary impairment losses.
Deterioration in credit quality of the companies or assets backing our investment securities, deterioration in the condition of the financial services industry, imbalances in liquidity recurring in the marketplace or declines in real estate values may further affect the fair value of these investment securities and increase the potential that certain unrealized losses will be recognized as other than temporary impairments in the future.
Mortgage loans on real estate are reported at cost, adjusted for amortization of premiums and accrual of discounts. Interest income is recorded when earned; however, interest ceases to accrue for loans on which interest is more than 90 days past due based upon contractual terms and/or when the collection of interest is not considered probable. We evaluate the mortgage loan portfolio for the establishment of a loan loss allowance by specific identification of impaired loans and the measurement of an estimated loss, if any, for each impaired loan identified and an analysis of the mortgage loan portfolio for the need of a general loan allowance for probable losses on all loans. If we determine that the value of any specific mortgage loan is impaired, the carrying amount of the mortgage loan will be reduced to its fair value, based upon the present value of expected future cash flows from the loan discounted at the loan's contractual interest rate, or the fair value of the underlying collateral, less costs to sell. The amount of the general loan allowance, if any, is based upon our evaluation of the probability of collection, historical loss experience, delinquencies, credit concentrations, underwriting standards and national and local economic conditions. The carrying value of impaired loans is reduced by the establishment of an allowance for loan losses, changes to which are recognized as realized gains or losses on investments. Interest income on impaired loans is recorded on a cash basis.
Other invested assets include company owned life insurance, equity securities, real estate, limited partnerships accounted for using the equity method and policy loans. Company owned life insurance is recorded at the amount that can be realized under the insurance contract at the end of the reporting period, which is the cash surrender value adjusted for other charges or other amounts due that are probable at settlement. Equity securities are classified as available for sale and are reported at fair value. Unrealized gains and losses are included directly in a separate component of stockholders' equity, net of income taxes and certain adjustments for assumed changes in amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs and deferred sales inducements. Dividends are recognized when declared. Policy loans are stated at current unpaid principal balances.
Real estate owned is reported at cost less accumulated depreciation. Cost is determined at the time ownership is acquired in satisfaction of mortgage loans and is the lower of the carrying value of the mortgage loan or fair value of the real estate less its estimated cost to sell. Buildings and improvements are depreciated using the straight-line method over their estimated useful lives. Impairment losses on real estate owned are recognized when there are indicators of impairment present and the expected future undiscounted cash flows are not sufficient to recover the real estate's carrying value. Any impairment losses are reported as realized losses and are part of net income.
Derivative Instruments
Our derivative instruments include call options used to fund fixed index annuity credits, interest rate swap and caps used to manage interest rate risk associated with the floating rate component on certain of our subordinated debentures, call options to hedge the conversion spread on our convertible senior notes (see Note 9) and certain other derivative instruments embedded in other contracts. All of our derivative instruments are recognized in the balance sheet at fair value and changes in fair value are recognized immediately in operations. See Note 5 for more information on derivative instruments.
Cash and Cash Equivalents
We consider all highly liquid debt instruments purchased with an original maturity of three months or less to be cash equivalents.
We also consider reverse repurchase agreements, which typically have an initial maturity of 6 weeks or less, to be cash equivalents. Amounts advanced under these agreements represent short-term loans that carry a fixed rate of interest. Borrowers under these agreements are required to post collateral that is investment grade debt securities with fair value in excess of the amount advanced.
Book Overdrafts
Under our cash management system, checks issued but not yet presented to banks frequently result in overdraft balances for accounting purposes and are classified as Other liabilities on our consolidated balance sheets. We report the changes in the amount of the overdraft balance as a financing activity in our consolidated statement of cash flows as Change in checks in excess of cash balance.

F-10

Table of Contents
AMERICAN EQUITY INVESTMENT LIFE HOLDING COMPANY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)


Deferred Policy Acquisition Costs and Deferred Sales Inducements
To the extent recoverable from future policy revenues and gross profits, certain costs that are incremental or directly related to the successful production of new business are not expensed when incurred but instead are capitalized as deferred policy acquisition costs or deferred sales inducements. Deferred policy acquisition costs and deferred sales inducements are subject to loss recognition testing on a quarterly basis or when an event occurs that may warrant loss recognition. Deferred policy acquisition costs consist primarily of commissions and certain costs of policy issuance. Deferred sales inducements consist of premium and interest bonuses credited to policyholder account balances.

F-10

Table of Contents
AMERICAN EQUITY INVESTMENT LIFE HOLDING COMPANY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)


For annuity products, these capitalized costs are being amortized generally in proportion to expected gross profits from investment spreads, including the cost of hedging the fixed indexed annuity obligations, and, to a lesser extent, from product charges net of expected excess payments for lifetime income benefit riders, and mortality and expense margins. Current and future period gross profits/margins for fixed index annuities also include the impact of amounts recorded for the change in fair value of derivatives and the change in fair value of embedded derivatives. That amortization is adjusted retrospectively through an unlocking process when estimates of current or future gross profits/margins (including the impact of net realized gains on investments and net OTTI losses recognized in operations) to be realized from a group of products are revised. Deferred policy acquisition costs and deferred sales inducements are also adjusted for the change in amortization that would have occurred if available for sale fixed maturity securities and equity securities had been sold at their aggregate fair value at the end of the reporting period and the proceeds reinvested at current yields. The impact of this adjustment is included in accumulated other comprehensive income within consolidated stockholders' equity, net of applicable taxes. See Note 6 for more information on deferred policy acquisition costs and deferred sales inducements.
Policy Benefit Reserves
Policy benefit reserves for fixed index annuities with returns linked to the performance of a specified market index are equal to the sum of the fair value of the embedded derivatives and the host (or guaranteed) component of the contracts. The host value is established at inception of the contract and accreted over the policy's life at a constant rate of interest. Future policy benefit reserves for fixed index annuities earning a fixed rate of interest and other deferred annuity products are computed under a retrospective deposit method and represent policy account balances before applicable surrender charges. For the years ended December 31, 2014, 20132016, 2015 and 2012,2014, interest crediting rates for these products ranged from 1.20%1.00% to 4.50%3.30%. These
The liability for lifetime income benefit riders is based on estimates of the value of benefit payments expected to be paid in excess of projected policy values recognizing the excess over the expected lives of the underlying policies based on actual and expected assessments including spreads and product charges and fees. The inputs used in the calculation of the liability for lifetime income benefit riders include actual policy values, actual income account values, actual payout factors, actual roll-up rates include interest bonuses capitalized as deferred sales inducements.and our best estimate assumptions for future policy growth, future policy decrements, the ages at which policyholders are expected to elect to begin to receive lifetime income benefit payments, the percentage of policyholders who elect to receive lifetime income benefit payments and the type of income benefit payments selected upon election.
Policy benefit reserves are not reduced for amounts ceded under coinsurance agreements which are reported as coinsurance deposits on our consolidated balance sheets. See Note 7 for more information on reinsurance.
The liability for future policy benefits for traditional life insurance is based on net level premium reserves, including assumptions as to interest, mortality, and other assumptions underlying the guaranteed policy cash values. Reserve interest assumptions are level and range from 3.00% to 5.50%. Policy benefit claims are charged to expense in the period that the claims are incurred.
Deferred Income Taxes
Deferred income tax assets or liabilities are computed based on the temporary differences between the financial statement and income tax bases of assets and liabilities using the enacted marginal tax rate. Deferred income tax expenses or benefits are based on the changes in the asset or liability from period to period. Deferred income tax assets are subject to ongoing evaluation of whether such assets will more likely than not be realized. The realization of deferred income tax assets primarily depends on generating future taxable income during the periods in which temporary differences become deductible. Deferred income tax assets are reduced by a valuation allowance if, based on the weight of available evidence, it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax asset will not be realized. In making such a determination, all available positive and negative evidence, including scheduled reversals of deferred tax liabilities, projected future taxable income, tax planning strategies and recent financial operations, is considered. The realization of deferred income tax assets related to unrealized losses on available for sale fixed maturity securities is also based upon our intent and ability to hold those securities for a period of time sufficient to allow for a recovery in fair value and not realize the unrealized loss.

F-11

Table of Contents
AMERICAN EQUITY INVESTMENT LIFE HOLDING COMPANY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)


Recognition of Premium Revenues and Costs
Revenues for annuity products include surrender and living income benefit rider charges assessed against policyholder account balances during the period. Interest sensitive and index product benefits related to annuity products include interest credited or index credits to policyholder account balances. In addition, thebalances pursuant to accounting by insurance companies for certain long-duration contracts. The change in fair value of the embedded derivatives withinfor fixed index annuityannuities equals the change in the difference between policy benefit reserves for fixed index annuities computed under the derivative accounting standard and the long-duration contracts is included in benefits and expenses.accounting standard at each balance sheet date.
Considerations from immediate annuities with life contingencies are recognized as revenue when the policy is issued.
Traditional life insurance premiums are recognized as revenues over the premium-paying period. Certain group policies include provisions for annual experience refunds of premiums equal to net premiums received less an administrative fee and less claims incurred. Such amounts (2014(2016 - $1.7$1.5 million; 20132015 - $1.1$1.5 million; and 20122014 - $1.1$1.7 million) are reported as a reduction of traditional life insurance premiums in the consolidated statements of operations. Future policy benefits are recognized as expenses over the life of the policy by means of the provision for future policy benefits.
All insurance-related revenues, including the change in the fair value of derivatives for call options related to the business ceded under coinsurance agreements (see Note 7), benefits, losses and expenses are reported net of reinsurance ceded.
Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)
Other comprehensive income (loss) includes all changes in stockholders' equity during a period except those resulting from investments by and distributions to stockholders. Other comprehensive income (loss) excludes net realized investment gains (losses) included in net income which merely represent transfers from unrealized to realized gains and losses.
Adopted Accounting Pronouncements
In April 2015, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued an accounting standards update ("ASU") which requires that debt issuance costs related to a recognized debt liability be presented in the balance sheet as a direct deduction from the carrying amount of that debt liability, consistent with debt discounts. Subsequently, in August 2015, the FASB issued an ASU that states that the Securities and Exchange Commission staff would not object to an entity deferring and presenting debt issuance costs related to line-of-credit arrangements as an asset and expensing those costs ratably over the term of the line of credit arrangement. These ASU's became effective for us on January 1, 2016, and retroactive application was required. Adoption of these ASU's did not have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.
New Accounting Pronouncements
In January 2016, the FASB issued an ASU that, among other aspects of recognition, measurement, presentation and disclosure of financial instruments, primarily requires equity investments (except those accounted for under the equity method of accounting or those that result in consolidation of the investee) to be measured at fair value with changes in fair value recognized in net income. However, an entity may choose to measure equity investments that do not have readily determinable fair values at cost minus impairment, if any, plus or minus changes resulting from observable price changes in orderly transactions for the identical or a similar investment of the same issuer. Additionally, it changes the accounting for financial liabilities measured at fair value under the fair value option and eliminates some disclosures regarding fair value of financial assets and liabilities measured at amortized cost. This ASU will be effective for us on January 1, 2018, and we have not determined the effect it will have on our consolidated financial statements.
In February 2016, the FASB issued an ASU that will require recognizing lease assets and lease liabilities on the balance sheet and disclosing key information about leasing arrangements. This ASU affects accounting and disclosure more dramatically for lessees as accounting for lessors is mainly unchanged. This ASU will be effective for us on January 1, 2019, with early adoption permitted, and we have not determined the effect it will have on our consolidated financial statements.
In March 2016, the FASB issued an ASU related to the accounting for share-based payment transactions. The aspects of accounting guidance affected by this ASU are income taxes, classification of awards as either equity or liabilities, and classification on the statement of cash flows. This ASU will be effective for us on January 1, 2017, with early adoption permitted, and we have not determined the effect it will have on our consolidated financial statements.
In June 2016, the FASB issued an ASU that significantly changes the impairment model for most financial assets that are measured at amortized cost and certain other instruments from an incurred loss model to an expected loss model that requires these assets be presented at the net amount expected to be collected. In addition, credit losses on available for sale debt securities should be recorded through an allowance account.  This ASU will be effective for us on January 1, 2020, with early adoption permitted, and we have not yet determined the impact this updated guidance will have on our consolidated financial statements.
In August 2016, the FASB issued an ASU that clarifies how certain cash receipts and cash payments are to be presented and classified in the statement of cash flows. This ASU will be effective for us on January 1, 2018, with early adoption permitted, and we have not yet determined the impact this updated guidance will have on our consolidated financial statements.

F-11F-12

Table of Contents
AMERICAN EQUITY INVESTMENT LIFE HOLDING COMPANY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)


Adopted Accounting Pronouncements
In February 2013, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued an accounting standards update ("ASU") that expands the disclosure requirements related to other comprehensive income (loss). A reporting entity is now required to provide information about the amounts reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) by component. In addition, a reporting entity is required to present, either on the face of the statement where net income is presented or in the notes, significant amounts reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive income by the respective line items of net income but only if the amount reclassified is required to be reclassified to net income in its entirety in the same reporting period. This ASU became effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2012. We adopted this ASU on January 1, 2013.
New Accounting Pronouncements
In June 2014, the FASB issued an ASU that requires that a performance target in a share based payment arrangement that affects vesting and that could be achieved after the requisite service period be treated as a performance condition. The requisite service period ends when the employee can cease rendering service and still be eligible to vest in the award if the performance target is achieved. This ASU will be effective for us on January 1, 2016, and early adoption is permitted, but it is not expected to have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.
2.     Fair Values of Financial Instruments
The following sets forth a comparison of the carrying amounts and fair values of our financial instruments:
December 31,December 31,
2014 20132016 2015
Carrying
Amount
 Fair Value 
Carrying
Amount
 Fair Value
Carrying
Amount
 Fair Value 
Carrying
Amount
 Fair Value
(Dollars in thousands)(Dollars in thousands)
Assets              
Fixed maturity securities:              
Available for sale$32,445,202
 $32,445,202
 $26,610,447
 $26,610,447
$41,060,494
 $41,060,494
 $36,421,839
 $36,421,839
Held for investment76,432
 75,838
 76,255
 60,840
76,825
 68,766
 76,622
 65,377
Equity securities, available for sale7,805
 7,805
 7,778
 7,778
Mortgage loans on real estate2,434,580
 2,493,901
 2,581,082
 2,615,410
2,480,956
 2,522,035
 2,435,257
 2,471,864
Derivative instruments731,113
 731,113
 856,050
 856,050
830,519
 830,519
 337,256
 337,256
Other investments266,488
 273,004
 192,198
 193,343
308,774
 300,918
 292,872
 297,903
Cash and cash equivalents701,514
 701,514
 897,529
 897,529
791,266
 791,266
 397,749
 397,749
Coinsurance deposits3,044,342
 2,698,552
 2,999,618
 2,669,432
4,639,492
 4,150,792
 3,187,470
 2,860,882
Interest rate caps2,778
 2,778
 6,103
 6,103
1,082
 1,082
 1,410
 1,410
Interest rate swap
 
 712
 712
2015 notes hedges30,291
 30,291
 107,041
 107,041
Counterparty collateral206,096
 206,096
 315,824
 315,824
145,693
 145,693
 82,312
 82,312
              
Liabilities              
Policy benefit reserves39,463,987
 33,078,978
 35,453,166
 29,670,827
51,280,331
 43,104,183
 45,151,460
 38,435,515
Single premium immediate annuity (SPIA) benefit reserves365,440
 377,654
 417,625
 430,835
297,724
 308,028
 324,264
 336,066
Notes payable421,679
 503,349
 549,958
 699,435
Notes and loan payable493,755
 519,440
 393,227
 417,752
Subordinated debentures246,243
 244,437
 246,050
 234,959
241,853
 225,106
 241,452
 216,933
2015 notes embedded conversion derivative30,291
 30,291
 107,041
 107,041
Interest rate swap2,644
 2,644
 
 
2,113
 2,113
 3,139
 3,139
Fair value is the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability (exit price) in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. The objective of a fair value measurement is to determine that price for each financial instrument at each measurement date. We meet this objective using various methods of valuation that include market, income and cost approaches.

F-12

Table of Contents
AMERICAN EQUITY INVESTMENT LIFE HOLDING COMPANY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)


We categorize our financial instruments into three levels of fair value hierarchy based on the priority of inputs used in determining fair value. The hierarchy defines the highest priority inputs (Level 1) as quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities. The lowest priority inputs (Level 3) are our own assumptions about what a market participant would use in determining fair value such as estimated future cash flows. In certain cases, the inputs used to measure fair value may fall into different levels of the fair value hierarchy. In such cases, a financial instrument's level within the fair value hierarchy is based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement. Our assessment of the significance of a particular input to the fair value measurement in its entirety requires judgment and considers factors specific to the financial instrument. We categorize financial assets and liabilities recorded at fair value in the consolidated balance sheets as follows:
Level 1—Quoted prices are available in active markets for identical financial instruments as of the reporting date. We do not adjust the quoted price for these financial instruments, even in situations where we hold a large position and a sale could reasonably impact the quoted price.
Level 2—Quoted prices in active markets for similar financial instruments, quoted prices for identical or similar financial instruments in markets that are not active; and models and other valuation methodologies using inputs other than quoted prices that are observable.
Level 3—Models and other valuation methodologies using significant inputs that are unobservable for financial instruments and include situations where there is little, if any, market activity for the financial instrument. The inputs into the determination of fair value require significant management judgment or estimation. Financial instruments that are included in Level 3 are securities for which no market activity or data exists and for which we used discounted expected future cash flows with our own assumptions about what a market participant would use in determining fair value.
Transfers of securities among the levels occur at times and depend on the type of inputs used to determine fair value of each security. There were no transfers between levels during 2014 and 2013.any period presented.

F-13

Table of Contents
AMERICAN EQUITY INVESTMENT LIFE HOLDING COMPANY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)


Our assets and liabilities which are measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of December 31, 20142016 and 20132015 are presented below based on the fair value hierarchy levels:
Total
Fair Value
 
Quoted
Prices
in Active
Markets
(Level 1)
 
Significant
Other
Observable
Inputs
(Level 2)
 
Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
(Level 3)
Total
Fair Value
 
Quoted
Prices
in Active
Markets
(Level 1)
 
Significant
Other
Observable
Inputs
(Level 2)
 
Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
(Level 3)
(Dollars in thousands)(Dollars in thousands)
December 31, 2014       
December 31, 2016       
Assets              
Fixed maturity securities:              
Available for sale:              
United States Government full faith and credit$138,460
 $4,255
 $134,205
 $
$11,805
 $5,381
 $6,424
 $
United States Government sponsored agencies1,393,890
 
 1,393,890
 
1,344,787
 
 1,344,787
 
United States municipalities, states and territories3,723,309
 
 3,723,309
 
3,926,950
 
 3,926,950
 
Foreign government obligations193,803
 
 193,803
 
232,233
 
 232,233
 
Corporate securities21,490,292
 11
 21,490,281
 
27,118,526
 6
 27,118,520
 
Residential mortgage backed securities1,751,345
 
 1,750,970
 375
1,254,835
 
 1,254,835
 
Commercial mortgage backed securities2,807,620
 
 2,807,620
 
5,365,235
 
 5,365,235
 
Other asset backed securities946,483
 
 946,483
 
1,806,123
 
 1,806,123
 
Equity securities, available for sale: finance, insurance and real estate7,805
 
 7,805
 
Other investments: equity securities, available for sale8,000
 
 8,000
 
Derivative instruments731,113
 
 731,113
 
830,519
 
 830,519
 
Cash and cash equivalents701,514
 701,514
 
 
791,266
 791,266
 
 
Interest rate caps2,778
 
 2,778
 
1,082
 
 1,082
 
2015 notes hedges30,291
 
 30,291
 
Counterparty collateral206,096
 
 206,096
 
145,693
 
 145,693
 
$34,124,799
 $705,780
 $33,418,644
 $375
$42,837,054
 $796,653
 $42,040,401
 $
Liabilities              
2015 notes embedded conversion derivative$30,291
 $
 $30,291
 $
Interest rate swap2,644
 
 2,644
 
$2,113
 $
 $2,113
 $
Fixed index annuities—embedded derivatives5,574,653
 
 
 5,574,653
6,563,288
 
 
 6,563,288
$5,607,588
 $
 $32,935
 $5,574,653
$6,565,401
 $
 $2,113
 $6,563,288
December 31, 2013       
December 31, 2015       
Assets              
Fixed maturity securities:              
Available for sale:              
United States Government full faith and credit$42,925
 $4,805
 $38,120
 $
$471,256
 $438,598
 $32,658
 $
United States Government sponsored agencies1,194,289
 
 1,194,289
 
1,398,611
 
 1,398,611
 
United States municipalities, states and territories3,306,743
 
 3,306,743
 
3,755,367
 
 3,755,367
 
Foreign government obligations91,557
 
 91,557
 
212,565
 
 212,565
 
Corporate securities17,233,037
 20
 17,233,017
 
23,802,394
 121
 23,802,273
 
Residential mortgage backed securities1,971,960
 
 1,970,584
 1,376
1,462,072
 
 1,462,072
 
Commercial mortgage backed securities1,735,460
 
 1,735,460
 
4,174,396
 
 4,174,396
 
Other asset backed securities1,034,476
 359
 1,034,117
 
1,145,178
 
 1,145,178
 
Equity securities, available for sale: finance, insurance and real estate7,778
 
 7,778
 
Other investments: equity securities, available for sale7,828
 
 7,828
 
Derivative instruments856,050
 
 856,050
 
337,256
 
 337,256
 
Cash and cash equivalents897,529
 897,529
 
 
397,749
 397,749
 
 
Interest rate caps6,103
 
 6,103
 
1,410
 
 1,410
 
Interest rate swap712
 
 712
 
2015 notes hedges107,041
 
 107,041
 
Counterparty collateral315,824
 
 315,824
 
82,312
 
 82,312
 
$28,801,484
 $902,713
 $27,897,395
 $1,376
$37,248,394
 $836,468
 $36,411,926
 $
Liabilities              
2015 notes embedded conversion derivative$107,041
 $
 $107,041
 $
Interest rate swap$3,139
 $
 $3,139
 $
Fixed index annuities—embedded derivatives4,406,163
 
 
 4,406,163
5,983,622
 
 
 5,983,622
$4,513,204
 $
 $107,041
 $4,406,163
$5,986,761
 $
 $3,139
 $5,983,622

F-14

Table of Contents
AMERICAN EQUITY INVESTMENT LIFE HOLDING COMPANY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)


The following methods and assumptions were used in estimating the fair values of financial instruments during the periods presented in these consolidated financial statements.
Fixed maturity securities and equity securities
The fair values of fixed maturity securities and equity securities in an active and orderly market are determined by utilizing independent pricing services. The independent pricing services incorporate a variety of observable market data in their valuation techniques, including:
reported trading prices,
benchmark yields,
broker-dealer quotes,
benchmark securities,
bids and offers,
credit ratings,
relative credit information, and
other reference data.
The independent pricing services also take into account perceived market movements and sector news, as well as a security's terms and conditions, including any features specific to that issue that may influence risk and marketability. Depending on the security, the priority of the use of observable market inputs may change as some observable market inputs may not be relevant or additional inputs may be necessary.
The independent pricing services provide quoted market prices when available. Quoted prices are not always available due to market inactivity. When quoted market prices are not available, the third parties use yield data and other factors relating to instruments or securities with similar characteristics to determine fair value for securities that are not actively traded. We generally obtain one value from our primary external pricing service. In situations where a price is not available from this service, we may obtain further quotes or prices from additional parties as needed. In addition, for our callable United States Government sponsored agencies we obtain multiple broker quotes and take the average of the broker prices received. Market indices of similar rated asset class spreads are considered for valuations and broker indications of similar securities are compared. Inputs used by the broker include market information, such as yield data and other factors relating to instruments or securities with similar characteristics. Valuations and quotes obtained from third party commercial pricing services are non-binding and do not represent quotes on which one may execute the disposition of the assets.
We validate external valuations at least quarterly through a combination of procedures that include the evaluation of methodologies used by the pricing services, analytical reviews and performance analysis of the prices against trends, and maintenance of a securities watch list. Additionally, as needed we utilize discounted cash flow models or perform independent valuations on a case-by-case basis using inputs and assumptions similar to those used by the pricing services. Although we do identify differences from time to time as a result of these validation procedures, we did not make any significant adjustments as of December 31, 20142016 and 2013.2015.
Mortgage loans on real estate
Mortgage loans on real estate are not measured at fair value on a recurring basis. The fair values of mortgage loans on real estate are calculated using discounted expected cash flows using current competitive market interest rates currently being offered for similar loans. The fair values of impaired mortgage loans on real estate that we have considered to be collateral dependent are based on the fair value of the real estate collateral (based on appraised values) less estimated costs to sell. The inputs utilized to determine fair value of all mortgage loans are unobservable market data (competitive market interest rates and appraised property values)rates); therefore, fair value of mortgage loans falls into Level 3 in the fair value hierarchy.
Derivative instruments
The fair values of derivative instruments, primarily call options, are based upon the amount of cash that we will receive to settle each derivative instrument on the reporting date. These amounts are determined by our investment team using industry accepted valuation models and are adjusted for the nonperformance risk of each counterparty net of any collateral held. Inputs include market volatility and risk free interest rates and are used in income valuation techniques in arriving at a fair value for each option contract. The nonperformance risk for each counterparty is based upon its credit default swap rate. We have no performance obligations related to the call options purchased to fund our fixed index annuity policy liabilities.

F-15

Table of Contents
AMERICAN EQUITY INVESTMENT LIFE HOLDING COMPANY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)


Other investments
None ofAvailable for sale equity securities are the only financial instruments included in other investments that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis.basis (see determination of fair value above). Financial instruments included in other investments that are not measured at fair value on a recurring bases are policy loans, equity method investments and company owned life insurance (COLI). We have not attempted to determine the fair values associated with our policy loans, as we believe any differences between carrying value and the fair values afforded these instruments are immaterial to our consolidated financial position and, accordingly, the cost to provide such disclosure does not justify the benefit to be derived. The fair value of our equity method investments qualify as Level 3 fair values and were determined by calculating the present value of future cash flows discounted by a risk free rate, a risk spread and a liquidity discount. The risk spread and liquidity discount are rates determined by our investment professionals and are unobservable market inputs. The fair value of our COLI approximates the cash surrender value of the policies and whose fair values fall within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy.
Cash and cash equivalents
Amounts reported in the consolidated balance sheets for these instruments are reported at their historical cost which approximates fair value due to the nature of the assets assigned to this category.
Interest rate capsswap and swapcaps
The fair values of our pay fixed/receive variable interest rate swap and interest rate caps are obtained from third parties and are determined by discounting expected future cash flows using projected LIBOR rates for the term of the swap and caps.
2015 notes hedges
The fair value of these call options has been determined by a third party who applies market observable data such as our common stock price, its dividend yield and its volatility, as well as the time to expiration of the call options to determine a fair value of the buy side of these options.
Counterparty collateral
Amounts reported in other assets of the consolidated balance sheets for these instruments are reported at their historical cost which approximates fair value due to the nature of the assets assigned to this category.
Policy benefit reserves, coinsurance deposits and SPIA benefit reserves
The fair values of the liabilities under contracts not involving significant mortality or morbidity risks (principally deferred annuities), are stated at the cost we would incur to extinguish the liability (i.e., the cash surrender value) as these contracts are generally issued without an annuitization date. The coinsurance deposits related to the annuity benefit reserves have fair values determined in a similar fashion. For period-certain annuity benefit contracts, the fair value is determined by discounting the benefits at the interest rates currently in effect for newly purchasedissued immediate annuity contracts. We are not required to and have not estimated the fair value of the liabilities under contracts that involve significant mortality or morbidity risks, as these liabilities fall within the definition of insurance contracts that are exceptions from financial instruments that require disclosures of fair value. Policy benefit reserves, coinsurance deposits and SPIA benefit reserves are not measured at fair value on a recurring basis. All of the fair values presented within these categories fall within Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy as most of the inputs are unobservable market data.
Notes and loan payable
The fair values of our senior unsecured notes and convertible senior notes are based upon pricing matrices developed by a third party pricing service when quoted market prices are not available and are categorized as Level 2 within the fair value hierarchy. The fair value of our term loan is estimated using discounted cash flow calculations based principally on observable inputs including our incremental borrowing rate, which reflects our credit rating, for a similar type of borrowing with a maturity consistent with that remaining for the term loan. Notes and loan payable are not remeasured at fair value on a recurring basis.
Subordinated debentures
Fair values for subordinated debentures are estimated using discounted cash flow calculations based principally on observable inputs including our incremental borrowing rates, which reflect our credit rating, for similar types of borrowings with maturities consistent with those remaining for the debt being valued. These fair values are categorized as Level 2 within the fair value hierarchy. Subordinated debentures are not measured at fair value on a recurring basis.
2015 notes embedded conversion derivative
The fair value of this embedded derivative is determined by pricing the call options that hedge this potential liability. The terms of the conversion option are identical to the 2015 notes hedges and the method of determining fair value of the call options is based upon observable market data.

F-16

Table of Contents
AMERICAN EQUITY INVESTMENT LIFE HOLDING COMPANY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)


Fixed index annuities - embedded derivatives
We estimate the fair value of the embedded derivative component of our fixed index annuity policy benefit reserves at each valuation date by (i) projecting policy contract values and minimum guaranteed contract values over the expected lives of the contracts and (ii) discounting the excess of the projected contract value amounts at the applicable risk free interest rates adjusted for our nonperformance risk related to those liabilities. The projections of policy contract values are based on our best estimate assumptions for future policy growth and future policy decrements. Our best estimate assumptions for future policy growth include assumptions for the expected index credit on the next policy anniversary date which are derived from the fair values of the underlying call options purchased to fund such index credits and the expected costs of annual call options we will purchase in the future to fund index credits beyond the next policy anniversary. The projections of minimum guaranteed contract values include the same best estimate assumptions for policy decrements as were used to project policy contract values.

F-16

Table of Contents
AMERICAN EQUITY INVESTMENT LIFE HOLDING COMPANY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)


Within this determination we have the following significant unobservable inputs: 1) the expected cost of annual call options we will purchase in the future to fund index credits beyond the next policy anniversary and 2) our best estimates for future policy decrements, primarily lapse, partial withdrawal and mortality rates. As of December 31, 2016 and 2015, we utilized an estimate of 3.10% for the expected cost of annual call options, which are based on estimated account value growth and a historical review of our actual option costs.
Our best estimate assumptions for lapse, partial withdrawal and mortality rates are based on our actual experience and our outlook as to future expectations for such assumptions. These assumptions, which are consistent with the assumptions used in calculating deferred policy acquisition costs and deferred sales inducements, are reviewed on a quarterly basis and are revised as our experience develops and/or as future expectations change. Our mortality rate assumptions are based on 65% of the 1983 Basic Annuity Mortality Tables. The following tables providetable presents average lapse rate and partial withdrawal rate assumptions, by contract duration, used in estimating the fair value of the embedded derivative component of our fixed index annuity policy benefit reserves at each reporting date:
  Average Lapse Rates Average Partial Withdrawal Rates
Contract Duration (Years) December 31, 2016 December 31, 2015 December 31, 2016 December 31, 2015
1 - 5 1.76% 1.58% 3.30% 3.08%
6 - 10 6.58% 8.55% 3.30% 3.55%
11 - 15 11.25% 12.01% 3.32% 3.59%
16 - 20 12.04% 12.99% 3.18% 3.22%
20+ 11.68% 12.54% 3.18% 3.22%
Lapse rates are generally expected to increase as surrender charge percentages decrease. Lapse expectations reflect a significant increase in the year in which the surrender charge period on a contract ends.
The following table provides a reconciliation of the beginning and ending balances for our Level 3 assets and liabilities, which are measured at fair value on a recurring basis using significant unobservable inputs for the years ended December 31, 20142016 and 2013:2015:
 Year Ended December 31,
 2014 2013
 (Dollars in thousands)
Available for sale securities   
Beginning balance$1,376
 $1,812
Principal returned(285) (864)
Amortization of premium/accretion of discount(262) 152
Total gains (losses) (realized/unrealized):   
Included in other comprehensive income (loss)109
 276
Included in operations(563) 
Ending balance$375
 $1,376
The Level 3 assets included in the table above are not material to our financial position, results of operations or cash flows, and it is management's opinion that the sensitivity of the inputs used in determining the fair value of these assets is not material as well.
Year Ended December 31,Year Ended December 31,
2014 20132016 2015
(Dollars in thousands)(Dollars in thousands)
Fixed index annuities—embedded derivatives      
Beginning balance$4,406,163
 $3,337,556
$5,983,622
 $5,574,653
Premiums less benefits1,700,827
 1,485,109
434,621
 1,234,637
Change in fair value, net(532,337) (416,502)145,045
 (825,668)
Ending balance$5,574,653
 $4,406,163
$6,563,288
 $5,983,622
Change in fair value, net for each period in our embedded derivatives are included in change in fair value of embedded derivatives in the consolidated statements of operations.
Certain derivatives embedded in our fixed index annuity contracts are our most significant financial instrument measured at fair value that are categorized as Level 3 in the fair value hierarchy. The contractual obligations for future annual index credits within our fixed index annuity contracts are treated as a "series of embedded derivatives" over the expected life of the applicable contracts. We estimate the fair value of these embedded derivatives at each valuation date by the method described above under fixed index annuities - embedded derivatives. The projections of minimum guaranteed contract values include the same best estimate assumptions for policy decrements as were used to project policy contract values.
The most sensitive assumption in determining policy liabilities for fixed index annuities is the rates used to discount the excess projected contract values. As indicated above, the discount rate reflects our nonperformance risk. If the discount rates used to discount the excess projected contract values at December 31, 2014,2016, were to increase by 100 basis points, the fair value of the embedded derivatives would decrease by $377.0$451.4 million recorded through operations as a decrease in the change in fair value of embedded derivatives and there would be a corresponding decrease of $225.0$276.4 million to our combined balance for deferred policy acquisition costs and deferred sales inducements recorded through operations as an increase in amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs and deferred sales inducements. A decrease by 100 basis points in the discount rate used to discount the excess projected contract values would increase the fair value of the embedded derivatives by $421.9$504.5 million recorded through operations as an increase in the change in fair value of embedded derivatives and there would be a corresponding increase of $244.2$299.5 million to our combined balance for deferred policy acquisition costs and deferred sales inducements recorded through operations as a decrease in amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs and deferred sales inducements.

F-17

Table of Contents
AMERICAN EQUITY INVESTMENT LIFE HOLDING COMPANY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)


3.     Investments
At December 31, 20142016 and 2013,2015, the amortized cost and fair value of fixed maturity securities and equity securities were as follows:
Amortized
Cost
 
Gross
Unrealized
Gains
 
Gross
Unrealized
Losses
 Fair Value
Amortized
Cost
 
Gross
Unrealized
Gains
 
Gross
Unrealized
Losses
 Fair Value
(Dollars in thousands)(Dollars in thousands)
December 31, 2014       
December 31, 2016       
Fixed maturity securities:              
Available for sale:              
United States Government full faith and credit$137,710
 $765
 $(15) $138,460
$11,864
 $229
 $(288) $11,805
United States Government sponsored agencies1,364,424
 43,399
 (13,933) 1,393,890
1,368,340
 23,360
 (46,913) 1,344,787
United States municipalities, states and territories3,293,551
 430,469
 (711) 3,723,309
3,626,395
 322,948
 (22,393) 3,926,950
Foreign government obligations181,128
 16,628
 (3,953) 193,803
224,588
 12,725
 (5,080) 232,233
Corporate securities19,984,747
 1,628,941
 (123,396) 21,490,292
26,338,214
 1,149,085
 (368,773) 27,118,526
Residential mortgage backed securities1,616,846
 136,704
 (2,205) 1,751,345
1,166,944
 91,445
 (3,554) 1,254,835
Commercial mortgage backed securities2,720,294
 90,649
 (3,323) 2,807,620
5,422,255
 59,994
 (117,014) 5,365,235
Other asset backed securities906,346
 48,022
 (7,885) 946,483
1,795,355
 31,471
 (20,703) 1,806,123
$30,205,046
 $2,395,577
 $(155,421) $32,445,202
$39,953,955
 $1,691,257
 $(584,718) $41,060,494
Held for investment:              
Corporate security$76,432
 $
 $(594) $75,838
$76,825
 $
 $(8,059) $68,766


 

 

 



 

 

 

Equity securities, available for sale:       
Other investments - equity securities, available for sale:       
Finance, insurance and real estate$7,509
 $296
 $
 $7,805
$7,521
 $479
 $
 $8,000
              
December 31, 2013       
December 31, 2015       
Fixed maturity securities:              
Available for sale:              
United States Government full faith and credit$44,852
 $367
 $(2,294) $42,925
$470,567
 $988
 $(299) $471,256
United States Government sponsored agencies1,313,776
 1,875
 (121,362) 1,194,289
1,386,219
 26,801
 (14,409) 1,398,611
United States municipalities, states and territories3,181,032
 164,785
 (39,074) 3,306,743
3,422,667
 341,328
 (8,628) 3,755,367
Foreign government obligations86,112
 8,907
 (3,462) 91,557
210,953
 12,547
 (10,935) 212,565
Corporate securities17,142,118
 606,948
 (516,029) 17,233,037
23,597,530
 887,288
 (682,424) 23,802,394
Residential mortgage backed securities1,895,913
 119,230
 (43,183) 1,971,960
1,366,985
 98,576
 (3,489) 1,462,072
Commercial mortgage backed securities1,821,988
 3,287
 (89,815) 1,735,460
4,238,265
 41,412
 (105,281) 4,174,396
Other asset backed securities1,041,939
 23,300
 (30,763) 1,034,476
1,130,524
 34,534
 (19,880) 1,145,178
$26,527,730
 $928,699
 $(845,982) $26,610,447
$35,823,710
 $1,443,474
 $(845,345) $36,421,839
Held for investment:              
Corporate security$76,255
 $
 $(15,415) $60,840
$76,622
 $
 $(11,245) $65,377


 

 

 



 

 

 

Equity securities, available for sale:       
Other investments - equity securities, available for sale:       
Finance, insurance and real estate$7,503
 $275
 $
 $7,778
$7,515
 $313
 $
 $7,828
At December 31, 2014, 33%2016, 35% of our fixed income securities have call features, of which 0.6%0.1% ($0.2 billion)55.7 million) were subject to call redemption and another 4%3.1% ($1.21.3 billion) will become subject to call redemption during 2015.2017. Approximately 70% of our fixed income securities that have call features are not callable until within six months of their stated maturities.

F-18

Table of Contents
AMERICAN EQUITY INVESTMENT LIFE HOLDING COMPANY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)


The amortized cost and fair value of fixed maturity securities at December 31, 2014,2016, by contractual maturity are shown below. Actual maturities will differ from contractual maturities because borrowers may have the right to call or prepay obligations with or without call or prepayment penalties. All of our mortgage and other asset backed securities provide for periodic payments throughout their lives and are shown below as separate lines.
Available for sale Held for investmentAvailable for sale Held for investment
Amortized
Cost
 Fair Value 
Amortized
Cost
 Fair Value
Amortized
Cost
 Fair Value 
Amortized
Cost
 Fair Value
(Dollars in thousands)(Dollars in thousands)
Due in one year or less$65,783
 $67,404
 $
 $
$236,707
 $241,934
 $
 $
Due after one year through five years1,483,940
 1,638,259
 
 
2,824,776
 2,979,768
 
 
Due after five years through ten years8,523,008
 8,738,123
 
 
11,659,762
 11,738,156
 
 
Due after ten years through twenty years7,251,089
 7,914,212
 
 
8,792,470
 9,284,726
 
 
Due after twenty years7,637,740
 8,581,756
 76,432
 75,838
8,055,686
 8,389,717
 76,825
 68,766
24,961,560
 26,939,754
 76,432
 75,838
31,569,401
 32,634,301
 76,825
 68,766
Residential mortgage backed securities1,616,846
 1,751,345
 
 
1,166,944
 1,254,835
 
 
Commercial mortgage backed securities2,720,294
 2,807,620
 
 
5,422,255
 5,365,235
 
 
Other asset backed securities906,346
 946,483
 
 
1,795,355
 1,806,123
 
 
$30,205,046
 $32,445,202
 $76,432
 $75,838
$39,953,955
 $41,060,494
 $76,825
 $68,766
Net unrealized gains on available for sale fixed maturity securities and equity securities reported as a separate component of stockholders' equity were comprised of the following:
December 31,December 31,
2014 20132016 2015
(Dollars in thousands)(Dollars in thousands)
Net unrealized gains on available for sale fixed maturity securities and equity securities$2,240,452
 $82,992
$1,107,018
 $598,442
Adjustments for assumed changes in amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs and deferred sales inducements(1,165,271) (46,588)(618,661) (322,859)
Deferred income tax valuation allowance reversal22,534
 22,534
22,534
 22,534
Deferred income tax expense(376,314) (12,742)(170,925) (96,454)
Net unrealized gains reported as accumulated other comprehensive income$721,401
 $46,196
$339,966
 $201,663
The National Association of Insurance Commissioners ("NAIC") assigns designations to fixed maturity securities. These designations range from Class 1 (highest quality) to Class 6 (lowest quality). In general, securities are assigned a designation based upon the ratings they are given by the Nationally Recognized Statistical Rating Organizations ("NRSRO's"). The NAIC designations are utilized by insurers in preparing their annual statutory statements. NAIC Class 1 and 2 designations are considered "investment grade" while NAIC Class 3 through 6 designations are considered "non-investment grade." Based on the NAIC designations, we had 97% and 98% of our fixed maturity portfolio rated investment grade at both December 31, 20142016 and 2013.2015, respectively.
The following table summarizes the credit quality, as determined by NAIC designation, of our fixed maturity portfolio as of the dates indicated:
 December 31, December 31,
 2014 2013 2016 2015
NAIC
Designation
 
Amortized
Cost
 
Fair
Value
 
Amortized
Cost
 
Fair
Value
 
Amortized
Cost
 
Fair
Value
 
Amortized
Cost
 
Fair
Value
 (Dollars in thousands) (Dollars in thousands)
1 $19,223,151
 $20,941,634
 $16,394,654
 $16,531,250
 $25,607,268
 $26,507,798
 $23,363,259
 $24,207,801
2 10,432,593
 10,981,618
 9,630,251
 9,598,399
 13,037,592
 13,295,648
 11,709,730
 11,589,325
3 602,191
 583,313
 502,822
 474,165
 1,201,059
 1,155,702
 758,531
 643,293
4 22,888
 14,089
 74,493
 66,078
 154,226
 137,188
 60,480
 44,312
5 
 
 
 
 17,475
 24,664
 
 
6 655
 386
 1,765
 1,395
 13,160
 8,260
 8,332
 2,485
 $30,281,478
 $32,521,040
 $26,603,985
 $26,671,287
 $40,030,780
 $41,129,260
 $35,900,332
 $36,487,216

F-19

Table of Contents
AMERICAN EQUITY INVESTMENT LIFE HOLDING COMPANY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)


The following table shows our investments' gross unrealized losses and fair value, aggregated by investment category and length of time that individual securities (consisting of 4021,514 and 1,0471,246 securities, respectively) have been in a continuous unrealized loss position, at December 31, 20142016 and 2013:2015:
Less than 12 months 12 months or more TotalLess than 12 months 12 months or more Total
Fair Value 
Unrealized
Losses
 Fair Value 
Unrealized
Losses
 Fair Value 
Unrealized
Losses
Fair Value 
Unrealized
Losses
 Fair Value 
Unrealized
Losses
 Fair Value 
Unrealized
Losses
(Dollars in thousands)(Dollars in thousands)
December 31, 2014           
December 31, 2016           
Fixed maturity securities:                      
Available for sale:                      
United States Government full faith and credit$
 $
 $498
 $(15) $498
 $(15)$7,405
 $(288) $
 $
 $7,405
 $(288)
United States Government sponsored agencies
 
 610,339
 (13,933) 610,339
 (13,933)995,548
 (46,913) 
 
 995,548
 (46,913)
United States municipalities, states and territories
 
 27,947
 (711) 27,947
 (711)463,409
 (22,393) 
 
 463,409
 (22,393)
Foreign government obligations14,194
 (1,068) 11,542
 (2,885) 25,736
 (3,953)29,158
 (913) 20,388
 (4,167) 49,546
 (5,080)
Corporate securities:                      
Finance, insurance and real estate253,439
 (2,586) 399,874
 (16,277) 653,313
 (18,863)2,302,103
 (79,077) 110,730
 (9,834) 2,412,833
 (88,911)
Manufacturing, construction and mining1,078,089
 (35,151) 694,088
 (35,926) 1,772,177
 (71,077)2,556,147
 (74,144) 702,978
 (74,382) 3,259,125
 (148,526)
Utilities and related sectors373,952
 (8,185) 344,313
 (10,153) 718,265
 (18,338)1,605,742
 (53,055) 196,085
 (16,208) 1,801,827
 (69,263)
Wholesale/retail trade88,766
 (2,290) 99,427
 (3,122) 188,193
 (5,412)396,310
 (9,433) 57,708
 (5,739) 454,018
 (15,172)
Services, media and other131,940
 (1,567) 277,296
 (8,139) 409,236
 (9,706)857,515
 (35,107) 132,170
 (11,794) 989,685
 (46,901)
Residential mortgage backed securities22,115
 (1,219) 20,427
 (986) 42,542
 (2,205)81,762
 (3,463) 1,853
 (91) 83,615
 (3,554)
Commercial mortgage backed securities241,637
 (1,344) 187,241
 (1,979) 428,878
 (3,323)3,148,395
 (116,938) 895
 (76) 3,149,290
 (117,014)
Other asset backed securities142,094
 (3,519) 58,958
 (4,366) 201,052
 (7,885)751,533
 (12,289) 146,167
 (8,414) 897,700
 (20,703)
$2,346,226
 $(56,929) $2,731,950
 $(98,492) $5,078,176
 $(155,421)$13,195,027
 $(454,013) $1,368,974
 $(130,705) $14,564,001
 $(584,718)
Held for investment:                      
Corporate security:                      
Insurance$
 $
 $75,838
 $(594) $75,838
 $(594)$
 $
 $68,766
 $(8,059) $68,766
 $(8,059)
                      
December 31, 2013           
December 31, 2015           
Fixed maturity securities:                      
Available for sale:                      
United States Government full faith and credit$32,969
 $(2,294) $
 $
 $32,969
 $(2,294)$37,730
 $(299) $
 $
 $37,730
 $(299)
United States Government sponsored agencies692,320
 (88,671) 467,309
 (32,691) 1,159,629
 (121,362)957,053
 (14,409) 
 
 957,053
 (14,409)
United States municipalities, states and territories614,056
 (39,074) 
 
 614,056
 (39,074)261,823
 (8,474) 2,846
 (154) 264,669
 (8,628)
Foreign government obligations26,298
 (3,462) 
 
 26,298
 (3,462)42,966
 (1,762) 15,463
 (9,173) 58,429
 (10,935)
Corporate securities:                      
Finance, insurance and real estate1,690,846
 (92,426) 153,037
 (12,873) 1,843,883
 (105,299)2,077,223
 (59,607) 49,912
 (14,855) 2,127,135
 (74,462)
Manufacturing, construction and mining3,370,775
 (191,245) 93,608
 (16,088) 3,464,383
 (207,333)3,517,967
 (246,456) 376,229
 (131,003) 3,894,196
 (377,459)
Utilities and related sectors1,829,868
 (102,758) 83,550
 (11,547) 1,913,418
 (114,305)2,240,652
 (138,940) 97,184
 (22,565) 2,337,836
 (161,505)
Wholesale/retail trade428,407
 (25,189) 17,687
 (1,992) 446,094
 (27,181)473,050
 (17,863) 38,682
 (8,125) 511,732
 (25,988)
Services, media and other834,699
 (51,508) 107,242
 (10,403) 941,941
 (61,911)1,037,011
 (39,937) 32,050
 (3,073) 1,069,061
 (43,010)
Residential mortgage backed securities309,599
 (41,080) 31,739
 (2,103) 341,338
 (43,183)162,770
 (2,958) 6,438
 (531) 169,208
 (3,489)
Commercial mortgage backed securities1,450,143
 (83,814) 51,099
 (6,001) 1,501,242
 (89,815)2,679,510
 (105,002) 11,495
 (279) 2,691,005
 (105,281)
Other asset backed securities356,018
 (20,426) 92,372
 (10,337) 448,390
 (30,763)457,055
 (10,581) 46,657
 (9,299) 503,712
 (19,880)
$11,635,998
 $(741,947) $1,097,643
 $(104,035) $12,733,641
 $(845,982)$13,944,810
 $(646,288) $676,956
 $(199,057) $14,621,766
 $(845,345)
Held for investment:                      
Corporate security:                      
Insurance$
 $
 $60,840
 $(15,415) $60,840
 $(15,415)$65,377
 $(11,245) $
 $
 $65,377
 $(11,245)

F-20

Table of Contents
AMERICAN EQUITY INVESTMENT LIFE HOLDING COMPANY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)


Based on the results of our process for evaluating available for sale securities in unrealized loss positions for other-than-temporary-impairments, which is discussed in detail later in this footnote, we have determined that the unrealized losses on the securities in the preceding table are temporary. The unrealized losses at December 31, 20142016 are principally related to timing of the purchases of these securities, which carry less yield than those available at December 31, 2014.2016.

F-20

Table of Contents
AMERICAN EQUITY INVESTMENT LIFE HOLDING COMPANY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)


The commodity related sectors had most of the gross unrealized losses in our corporate fixed income securities portfolio as of December 31, 2016. Commodity prices, specifically oil, gas and base metals,declined significantly in late 2015, but prices have risen in 2016 to levels that appear sustainable and should support prices and NRSRO ratings longer term. The value of oil has been significantly depressed as the amount of supply from new production has exceeded demand. In addition, iron ore and other key industrial metals have depressed prices as investors perceive the economic slowdown in Asia Pacific will curb demand as supply remains high. The companies in the metal and mining sectors experienced the largest decline in values of their debt in late 2015. In the above table, oil and metals and mining exposure is reflected within the foreign government; manufacturing, construction and mining; and utilities and related sectors. Within these sectors, we continue to monitor the impact to our investment portfolio for those companies that may be adversely affected, both directly and indirectly. Even though the energy holdings and a numbermajority of securitiesthe metals and mining holdings have seen theirsignificant improvements in values as oil and iron ore prices have increased, they could continue to see price volatility and possible downgrades in credit spreadsratings. If oil and commodity prices fall lower and remain wideat depressed levels for an extended period of time or decline further, certain issuers and investments may come under further stress. At this time, we believe the unrealized losses are temporary due to issuer or industry specific news while some financial and industrialthe fact that the price decline is driven by an over-supply of oil in the energy sector, credit spreads remain wide due to continued economic uncertainty and concerns of economic instability.
At December 31, 2014,which we had nofeel is unsustainable long term. Our exposure to sub-prime residential mortgage backed securities. All of our residential mortgage backed securities are pools of first-lien residential mortgage loans. Substantially all of the securitiesis in companies that we own arebelieve have more financial flexibility and significant operational scale to manage through the downturn. In addition, price declines in the most senior tranche of the securitization in which they are structuredmetal and are not subordinated to any other tranche. Our "Alt-A" residential mortgage backed securities are comprised of 34 securities with a total amortized cost basis of $244.3 millionmining sector have been heavily influenced by excess production and a fair value of $270.0 million. Despite recent improvementssofter demand. Companies in the capital markets,mining sector are more susceptible to rating downgrades and we believe companies will be under continued financial strain at the fair values of RMBS with weaker borrower characteristics continue at prices below amortized cost. For the RMBS that arecurrent commodity price structure. We believe company issuers in an unrealized loss position, the pricesour portfolio will likely remain below our cost basis until the housing market isbe able to absorb current and future foreclosures.meet their debt service obligations.
Approximately 78%86% and 95%84% of the unrealized losses on fixed maturity securities shown in the above table for December 31, 20142016 and 2013,2015, respectively, are on securities that are rated investment grade, defined as being the highest two NAIC designations. All of the fixed maturity securities with unrealized losses are current with respect to the payment of principal and interest.
Changes in net unrealized gains/lossesgains on investments for the years ended December 31, 2014, 20132016, 2015 and 20122014 are as follows:
Year Ended December 31,Year Ended December 31,
2014 2013 20122016 2015 2014
(Dollars in thousands)(Dollars in thousands)
Fixed maturity securities held for investment carried at amortized cost$14,821
 $(848) $(14,783)$3,186
 $(10,651) $14,821
Investments carried at fair value:          
Fixed maturity securities, available for sale$2,157,439
 $(2,132,392) $731,279
$508,410
 $(1,642,027) $2,157,439
Equity securities, available for sale21
 (8,549) 4,417
166
 17
 21
2,157,460
 (2,140,941) 735,696
508,576
 (1,642,010) 2,157,460
Adjustment for effect on other balance sheet accounts:          
Deferred policy acquisition costs and deferred sales inducements(1,118,683) 1,155,386
 (382,498)(295,802) 842,412
 (1,118,683)
Deferred income tax asset/liability(363,572) 344,944
 (123,620)(74,471) 279,860
 (363,572)
(1,482,255) 1,500,330
 (506,118)(370,273) 1,122,272
 (1,482,255)
Change in net unrealized gains/losses on investments carried at fair value$675,205
 $(640,611) $229,578
Change in net unrealized gains on investments carried at fair value$138,303
 $(519,738) $675,205
Components of net investment income are as follows:
Year Ended December 31,Year Ended December 31,
2014 2013 20122016 2015 2014
(Dollars in thousands)(Dollars in thousands)
Fixed maturity securities$1,394,301
 $1,229,486
 $1,112,296
$1,729,176
 $1,566,409
 $1,394,301
Equity securities404
 1,586
 3,090
531
 441
 404
Mortgage loans on real estate143,998
 159,769
 176,354
122,985
 131,892
 143,998
Cash and cash equivalents286
 775
 2,243
3,201
 601
 286
Other6,903
 5,711
 6,348
5,499
 4,858
 6,903
1,545,892
 1,397,327
 1,300,331
1,861,392
 1,704,201
 1,545,892
Less investment expenses(14,225) (13,400) (13,408)(11,520) (12,009) (14,225)
Net investment income$1,531,667
 $1,383,927
 $1,286,923
$1,849,872
 $1,692,192
 $1,531,667
Proceeds from sales of available for sale securities for the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014 2013 and 2012 were $0.2$1.0 billion, $1.5$0.4 billion and $0.5$0.2 billion, respectively. Scheduled principal repayments, calls and tenders for available for sale fixed maturity securities for the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014 2013were $1.7 billion, $1.2 billion and 2012 were $1.3 billion, $2.1 billion and $2.8 billion, respectively. Calls of held for investment fixed maturity securities for the year ended December 31, 2012 were $2.6 billion.

F-21

Table of Contents
AMERICAN EQUITY INVESTMENT LIFE HOLDING COMPANY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)


Realized gains and losses on sales are determined on the basis of specific identification of investments based on the trade date. Net realized gains (losses) on investments, excluding net OTTI losses are as follows:
Year Ended December 31,Year Ended December 31,
2014 2013 20122016 2015 2014
(Dollars in thousands)(Dollars in thousands)
Available for sale fixed maturity securities:          
Gross realized gains$3,273
 $39,079
 $10,906
$14,132
 $7,230
 $3,273
Gross realized losses(1,006) (6,170) (562)(4,036) (5,787) (1,006)
2,267
 32,909
 10,344
10,096
 1,443
 2,267
Available for sale equity securities:     
Gross realized gains
 9,571
 562
     
Other investments:          
Gain on sale of real estate2,454
 2,144
 5,149
884
 4,194
 2,454
Loss on sale of real estate(231) (1,317) 
(93) (575) (231)
Impairment losses on real estate(2,441) (1,195) (5,677)
 (1,297) (2,441)
(218) (368) (528)791
 2,322
 (218)
Mortgage loans on real estate:          
Increase in allowance for credit losses(6,052) (5,621) (16,832)
Decrease (increase) in allowance for credit losses(4,846) 1,018
 (6,052)
Recovery of specific allowance
 4,070
 
5,483
 5,428
 
(6,052) (1,551) (16,832)637
 6,446
 (6,052)
$(4,003) $40,561
 $(6,454)$11,524
 $10,211
 $(4,003)
Losses on available for sale fixed maturity securities in 2014, 20132016, 2015 and 20122014 were realized primarily due to strategies to reposition the fixed maturity security portfolio that result in improved net investment income, credit risk or duration profiles as they pertain to our asset liability management. Two corporate issuesSecurities were sold at a losslosses in 20132016 and 2015 due to the our long-term fundamental concern with the issuer'sissuers' ability to meet itstheir future financial obligations.
The following table summarizes the carrying value of our fixed maturity securities, mortgage loans on real estate and real estate owned that have been non-income producing for 12 consecutive months:
December 31,December 31,
2014 20132016 2015
(Dollars in thousands)(Dollars in thousands)
Fixed maturity securities, available for sale$11
 $20
$1,651
 $10
Mortgage loans on real estate
 3,511
Real estate owned868
 

 1,800
$879
 $3,531
$1,651
 $1,810
We review and analyze all investments on an ongoing basis for changes in market interest rates and credit deterioration. This review process includes analyzing our ability to recover the amortized cost basis of each investment that has a fair value that is materially lower than its amortized cost and requires a high degree of management judgment and involves uncertainty. The evaluation of securities for other than temporary impairments is a quantitative and qualitative process, which is subject to risks and uncertainties.

F-22

Table of Contents
AMERICAN EQUITY INVESTMENT LIFE HOLDING COMPANY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)


We have a policy and process to identify securities that could potentially have impairments that are other than temporary. This process involves monitoring market events and other items that could impact issuers. The evaluation includes but is not limited to such factors as:
the length of time and the extent to which the fair value has been less than amortized cost or cost;
whether the issuer is current on all payments and all contractual payments have been made as agreed;
the remaining payment terms and the financial condition and near-term prospects of the issuer;
the lack of ability to refinance due to liquidity problems in the credit market;
the fair value of any underlying collateral;
the existence of any credit protection available;
our intent to sell and whether it is more likely than not we would be required to sell prior to recovery for debt securities;
our assessment in the case of equity securities including perpetual preferred stocks with credit deterioration that the security cannot recover to cost in a reasonable period of time;
our intent and ability to retain equity securities for a period of time sufficient to allow for recovery;
consideration of rating agency actions; and
changes in estimated cash flows of mortgage and asset backed securities.

F-22

Table of Contents
AMERICAN EQUITY INVESTMENT LIFE HOLDING COMPANY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)


We determine whether other than temporary impairment losses should be recognized for debt and equity securities by assessing all facts and circumstances surrounding each security. Where the decline in fair value of debt securities is attributable to changes in market interest rates or to factors such as market volatility, liquidity and spread widening, and we anticipate recovery of all contractual or expected cash flows, we do not consider these investments to be other than temporarily impaired because we do not intend to sell these investments and it is not more likely than not we will be required to sell these investments before a recovery of amortized cost, which may be maturity. For equity securities, we recognize an impairment charge in the period in which we do not have the intent and ability to hold the securities until recovery of cost or we determine that the security will not recover to book value within a reasonable period of time. We determine what constitutes a reasonable period of time on a security-by-security basis by considering all the evidence available to us, including the magnitude of any unrealized loss and its duration.
Other than temporary impairment losses on equity securities are recognized in operations. If we intend to sell a debt security or if it is more likely than not that we will be required to sell a debt security before recovery of its amortized cost basis, other than temporary impairment has occurred and the difference between amortized cost and fair value will be recognized as a loss in operations.
If we do not intend to sell and it is not more likely than not we will be required to sell the debt security but also do not expect to recover the entire amortized cost basis of the security, an impairment loss would be recognized in operations in the amount of the expected credit loss. We determine the amount of expected credit loss by calculating the present value of the cash flows expected to be collected discounted at each security's acquisition yield based on our consideration of whether the security was of high credit quality at the time of acquisition. The difference between the present value of expected future cash flows and the amortized cost basis of the security is the amount of credit loss recognized in operations. The remaining amount of the other than temporary impairment is recognized in other comprehensive income (loss).
The determination of the credit loss component of a mortgage backed security is based on a number of factors. The primary consideration in this evaluation process is the issuer's ability to meet current and future interest and principal payments as contractually stated at time of purchase. Our review of these securities includes an analysis of the cash flow modeling under various default scenarios considering independent third party benchmarks, the seniority of the specific tranche within the structure of the security, the composition of the collateral and the actual default, loss severity and prepayment experience exhibited. With the input of third party assumptions for default projections, loss severity and prepayment expectations, we evaluate the cash flow projections to determine whether the security is performing in accordance with its contractual obligation.
We utilize the models from a leading structured product software specialist serving institutional investors. These models incorporate each security's seniority and cash flow structure. In circumstances where the analysis implies a potential for principal loss at some point in the future, we use the "best estimate" cash flow projection discounted at the security's effective yield at acquisition to determine the amount of our potential credit loss associated with this security. The discounted expected future cash flows equates to our expected recovery value. Any shortfall of the expected recovery when compared to the amortized cost of the security will be recorded as the credit loss component of the other than temporary impairment.
The cash flow modeling is performed on a security-by-security basis and incorporates actual cash flows on the residential mortgage backed securities through the current period, as well as the projection of remaining cash flows using a number of assumptions including default rates, prepayment rates and loss severity rates. The default curves we use are tailored to the Prime or Alt-A residential mortgage backed securities that we own, which assume lower default rates and loss severity for Prime securities versus Alt-A securities. These default curves are scaled higher or lower depending on factors such as current underlying mortgage loan performance, rating agency loss projections, loan to value ratios, geographic diversity, as well as other appropriate considerations.

F-23

Table of Contents
AMERICAN EQUITY INVESTMENT LIFE HOLDING COMPANY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)


The following table presents the range of significant assumptions used to determine the credit loss component of other than temporary impairments we have recognized on residential mortgage backed securities for the years ended December 31, 20142016 and 2013,2015, which are all senior level tranches within the structure of the securities:
 Discount Rate Default Rate Loss Severity Discount Rate Default Rate Loss Severity
Sector Vintage Min Max Min Max Min Max Vintage Min Max Min Max Min Max
Year ended December 31, 2014            
Year ended December 31, 2016            
Prime 2005 7.5% 7.5% 15% 15% 50% 50% 2005 7.7% 7.7% 8% 14% 50% 50%
 2006 6.5% 7.4% 11% 15% 40% 50% 2006 6.5% 7.3% 12% 13% 40% 50%
 2007 7.0% 7.0% 14% 14% 55% 55% 2007 6.2% 6.4% 18% 31% 50% 55%
Alt-A 2005 5.6% 6.4% 87% 91% 2% 2% 2005 7.4% 7.4% 11% 11% 60% 60%
                        
Year ended December 31, 2013            
Year ended December 31, 2015            
Prime 2003 5.1% 5.1% 2% 2% 30% 30% 2006 6.5% 7.4% 12% 14% 40% 50%
 2005 6.5% 7.7% 8% 18% 50% 65% 2007 5.8% 7.0% 15% 25% 45% 55%
 2006 5.8% 6.9% 9% 16% 45% 50%
 2007 6.2% 6.7% 11% 25% 40% 60%
 2008 6.6% 6.6% 16% 16% 45% 45%
 2009 6.8% 6.8% 17% 17% 60% 60%
Alt-A 2005 5.6% 8.7% 13% 81% 2% 65% 2005 5.6% 7.4% 13% 99% 2% 50%
 2007 6.2% 6.9% 38% 52% 60% 65%

F-23

Table of Contents
AMERICAN EQUITY INVESTMENT LIFE HOLDING COMPANY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)


The determination of the credit loss component of a corporate bond (including redeemable preferred stocks) is based on the underlying financial performance of the issuer and their ability to meet their contractual obligations. Considerations in our evaluation include, but are not limited to, credit rating changes, financial statement and ratio analysis, changes in management, significant changes in credit spreads, breaches of financial covenants and a review of the economic outlook for the industry and markets in which they trade. In circumstances where an issuer appears unlikely to meet its future obligation, or the security's price decline is deemed other than temporary, an estimate of credit loss is determined. Credit loss is calculated using default probabilities as derived from the credit default swaps markets in conjunction with recovery rates derived from independent third party analysis or a best estimate of credit loss. This credit loss rate is then incorporated into a present value calculation based on an expected principal loss in the future discounted at the yield at the date of purchase and compared to amortized cost to determine the amount of credit loss associated with the security.
In addition, for debt securities which we do not intend to sell and it is not more likely than not we will be required to sell, but our intent changes due to changes or events that could not have been reasonably anticipated, an other than temporary impairment charge is recognized. Once an impairment charge has been recorded, we then continue to review the other than temporarily impaired securities for appropriate valuation on an ongoing basis. Unrealized losses may be recognized in future periods through a charge to earnings should we later conclude that the decline in fair value below amortized cost is other than temporary pursuant to our accounting policy described above. The use of different methodologies and assumptions to determine the fair value of investments and the timing and amount of impairments may have a material effect on the amounts presented in our consolidated financial statements.
The following table summarizes other than temporary impairments by asset type:
 
Number
of Securities
 
Total
OTTI Losses
 
Portion of
OTTI Losses
Recognized in (from)
Other
Comprehensive
Income
 
Net OTTI
Losses
Recognized
in Operations
   (Dollars in thousands)
Year ended December 31, 2016       
Fixed maturity securities, available for sale:       
Corporate securities:       
Energy2
 $(642) $
 $(642)
Materials1
 (4,554) 1,575
 (2,979)
Telecommunications1
 (4,462) 562
 (3,900)
Utilities2
 (6,961) 798
 (6,163)
Residential mortgage backed securities9
 
 (783) (783)
Commercial mortgage backed securities5
 (1,540) 
 (1,540)
Other asset backed securities2
 (3,190) (3,482) (6,672)
 22
 $(21,349) $(1,330) $(22,679)
        
Year ended December 31, 2015       
Fixed maturity securities, available for sale:       
Corporate securities:       
Industrial2
 $(15,414) $2,975
 $(12,439)
Residential mortgage backed securities11
 (133) (2,089) (2,222)
Other asset backed securities1
 (10,000) 5,125
 (4,875)
 14
 $(25,547) $6,011
 $(19,536)
        
Year ended December 31, 2014       
Fixed maturity securities, available for sale:       
Residential mortgage backed securities7
 $
 $(2,627) $(2,627)


F-24

Table of Contents
AMERICAN EQUITY INVESTMENT LIFE HOLDING COMPANY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)


The following table summarizes other than temporary impairments by asset type:
 
Number
of Securities
 
Total
OTTI Losses
 
Portion of
OTTI Losses
Recognized from
Other
Comprehensive
Income
 
Net OTTI
Losses
Recognized
in Operations
   (Dollars in thousands)
Year ended December 31, 2014       
Fixed maturity securities, available for sale:       
Residential mortgage backed securities7
 $
 $(2,627) $(2,627)
        
Year ended December 31, 2013       
Fixed maturity securities, available for sale:       
United States Government sponsored agencies2
 $(2,775) $
 $(2,775)
Corporate securities:       
Industrial1
 (1,761) 
 (1,761)
Residential mortgage backed securities6
 
 (1,270) (1,270)
Equity security, available for sale:       
Industrial1
 (428) 
 (428)
 10
 $(4,964) $(1,270) $(6,234)
        
Year ended December 31, 2012       
Fixed maturity securities, available for sale:       
Corporate securities:       
Finance1
 $(1,765) $
 $(1,765)
Retail1
 (622) 
 (622)
Residential mortgage backed securities39
 (3,024) (9,521) (12,545)
 41
 $(5,411) $(9,521) $(14,932)
The cumulative portion of other than temporary impairments determined to be credit losses which have been recognized in operations for debt securities are summarized as follows:
Year Ended December 31,Year Ended December 31,
2014 20132016 2015
(Dollars in thousands)(Dollars in thousands)
Cumulative credit loss at beginning of year$(125,960) $(134,027)$(145,824) $(127,050)
Credit losses on securities for which OTTI has not previously been recognized
 (4,536)(18,414) (17,447)
Additional credit losses on securities for which OTTI has previously been recognized(2,627) (1,270)(4,265) (2,089)
Accumulated losses on securities that were disposed of during the period1,537
 13,873
2,128
 762
Cumulative credit loss at end of year$(127,050) $(125,960)$(166,375) $(145,824)

F-25

Table of Contents
AMERICAN EQUITY INVESTMENT LIFE HOLDING COMPANY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)


The following table summarizes the cumulative noncredit portion of OTTI and the change in fair value since recognition of OTTI, both of which were recognized in other comprehensive income, by major type of security, for securities that are part of our investment portfolio at December 31, 20142016 and 2013:2015:

Amortized Cost
 OTTI Recognized in Other Comprehensive Income Change in Fair Value Since OTTI was Recognized 

Fair Value

Amortized Cost
 OTTI Recognized in Other Comprehensive Income Change in Fair Value Since OTTI was Recognized 

Fair Value
(Dollars in thousands)(Dollars in thousands)
December 31, 2014       
December 31, 2016       
Fixed maturity securities, available for sale:              
Corporate securities$
 $
 $11
 $11
$17,549
 $(5,910) $13,566
 $25,205
Residential mortgage backed securities569,508
 (173,494) 215,625
 611,639
368,862
 (169,941) 205,854
 404,775
Commercial mortgage backed securities6,596
 
 (107) 6,489
Other asset backed securities6,683
 (1,643) (1,566) 3,474
$569,508
 $(173,494) $215,636
 $611,650
$399,690
 $(177,494) $217,747
 $439,943
December 31, 2013       
December 31, 2015       
Fixed maturity securities, available for sale:              
Corporate securities$
 $
 $20
 $20
$6,396
 $(2,975) $9
 $3,430
Residential mortgage backed securities679,265
 (176,334) 216,061
 718,992
466,871
 (170,724) 199,149
 495,296
Other asset backed securities8,154
 (5,125) (553) 2,476
$679,265
 $(176,334) $216,081
 $719,012
$481,421
 $(178,824) $198,605
 $501,202
At December 31, 20142016 and 2013,2015, fixed maturity securities and short-term investments with an amortized cost of $32.6$43.5 billion and $31.7$38.3 billion, respectively, were on deposit with state agencies to meet regulatory requirements. There are no restrictions on these assets.
At December 31, 20142016 and 2013,2015, we had no investment in any person or its affiliates (other than bonds issued by agencies of the United States Government) that exceeded 10% of stockholders' equity.
4.     Mortgage Loans on Real Estate
Our mortgage loan portfolio is summarized in the following table, totaled $2.4 billion and $2.6 billion at December 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively, withtable. There were commitments outstanding of $61.375.5 million at December 31, 2014.2016.
December 31,December 31,
2014 20132016 2015
(Dollars in thousands)(Dollars in thousands)
Principal outstanding$2,457,721
 $2,607,698
$2,490,619
 $2,449,909
Loan loss allowance(22,633) (26,047)(8,427) (14,142)
Deferred prepayment fees(508) (569)(1,236) (510)
Carrying value$2,434,580
 $2,581,082
$2,480,956
 $2,435,257

F-26F-25

Table of Contents
AMERICAN EQUITY INVESTMENT LIFE HOLDING COMPANY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)


The portfolio consists of commercial mortgage loans collateralized by the related properties and diversified as to property type, location and loan size. Our mortgage lending policies establish limits on the amount that can be loaned to one borrower and other criteria to attempt to reduce the risk of default. The mortgage loan portfolio is summarized by geographic region and property type as follows:
December 31,December 31,
2014 20132016 2015
Principal Percent Principal PercentPrincipal Percent Principal Percent
(Dollars in thousands)(Dollars in thousands)
Geographic distribution              
East$701,638
 28.5% $765,717
 29.4%$635,434
 25.5% $698,113
 28.5%
Middle Atlantic166,249
 6.8% 156,489
 6.0%151,640
 6.1% 160,261
 6.6%
Mountain279,075
 11.4% 356,246
 13.7%235,932
 9.5% 252,442
 10.3%
New England12,280
 0.5% 21,324
 0.8%12,724
 0.5% 13,161
 0.5%
Pacific302,307
 12.3% 317,431
 12.2%385,683
 15.5% 355,268
 14.5%
South Atlantic471,849
 19.2% 483,852
 18.5%519,065
 20.8% 456,227
 18.6%
West North Central349,028
 14.2% 351,794
 13.5%325,447
 13.1% 313,120
 12.8%
West South Central175,295
 7.1% 154,845
 5.9%224,694
 9.0% 201,317
 8.2%
$2,457,721
 100.0% $2,607,698
 100.0%$2,490,619
 100.0% $2,449,909
 100.0%
Property type distribution
   
  
   
  
Office$484,585
 19.7% $590,414
 22.6%$308,578
 12.4% $396,154
 16.2%
Medical Office88,275
 3.6% 125,703
 4.8%50,780
 2.1% 77,438
 3.2%
Retail711,775
 29.0% 711,364
 27.3%886,942
 35.6% 790,158
 32.2%
Industrial/Warehouse649,425
 26.4% 673,449
 25.8%700,644
 28.1% 686,400
 28.0%
Hotel30,640
 1.3% 61,574
 2.4%
 % 3,361
 0.1%
Apartment335,087
 13.6% 291,823
 11.2%375,837
 15.1% 352,971
 14.4%
Mixed use/other157,934
 6.4% 153,371
 5.9%167,838
 6.7% 143,427
 5.9%
$2,457,721
 100.0% $2,607,698
 100.0%$2,490,619
 100.0% $2,449,909
 100.0%
Our financing receivables currently consist of one portfolio segment which is our commercial mortgage loan portfolio. These are mortgage loans with collateral consisting of commercial real estate and borrowers consisting mostly of limited liability partnerships or limited liability corporations.
We evaluate our mortgage loan portfolio for the establishment of a loan loss allowance by specific identification of impaired loans and the measurement of an estimated loss for each individual loan identified. A mortgage loan is impaired when it is probable that we will be unable to collect all amounts due according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement. If we determine that the value of any specific mortgage loan is impaired, the carrying amount of the mortgage loan will be reduced to its fair value, based upon the present value of expected future cash flows from the loan discounted at the loan's effective interest rate, or the fair value of the underlying collateral less estimated costs to sell.
In addition, we analyze the mortgage loan portfolio for the need of a general loan allowance for probable losses on all other loans on a quantitative and qualitative basis. The amount of the general loan allowance is based upon management's evaluation of the collectability of the loan portfolio, historical loss experience, delinquencies, credit concentrations, underwriting standards and national and local economic conditions.
We rate each of the mortgage loans in our portfolio based on factors such as historical operating performance, loan to value ratio and economic outlook, among others. We calculate a loss factor to apply to each rating based on historical losses we have recognized in our mortgage loan portfolio. We apply the loss factors to the total principal outstanding within each rating category to determine an appropriate estimate of the general loan loss allowance. We also assess the portfolio qualitatively and apply a loss rate to all loans without a specific allowance based on management's assessment of economic conditions, and we apply an additional amount of loss allowance to a group of loans that we have identified as having higher risk of loss.

F-27F-26

Table of Contents
AMERICAN EQUITY INVESTMENT LIFE HOLDING COMPANY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)


The following table presents a rollforward of our specific and general valuation allowances for mortgage loans on real estate:
Year Ended December 31,Year Ended December 31,
2014 2013 20122016 2015 2014
Specific
Allowance
 
General
Allowance
 
Specific
Allowance
 
General
Allowance
 
Specific
Allowance
 
General
Allowance
Specific
Allowance
 
General
Allowance
 
Specific
Allowance
 
General
Allowance
 
Specific
Allowance
 
General
Allowance
(Dollars in thousands)(Dollars in thousands)
Beginning allowance balance$(16,847) $(9,200) $(23,134) $(11,100) $(23,664) $(9,300)$(7,842) $(6,300) $(12,333) $(10,300) $(16,847) $(9,200)
Charge-offs9,211
 
 9,738
 
 15,562
 
5,078
 
 2,045
 
 9,211
 
Recoveries255
 
 4,070
 
 
 
5,483
 
 5,428
 
 255
 
Change in provision for credit losses(4,952) (1,100) (7,521) 1,900
 (15,032) (1,800)(4,046) (800) (2,982) 4,000
 (4,952) (1,100)
Ending allowance balance$(12,333) $(10,300) $(16,847) $(9,200) $(23,134) $(11,100)$(1,327) $(7,100) $(7,842) $(6,300) $(12,333) $(10,300)
The specific allowance represents the total credit loss allowances on loans which are individually evaluated for impairment. The general allowance is for the group of loans discussed above which are collectively evaluated for impairment. The following table presents the total outstanding principal of loans evaluated for impairment by basis of impairment method:
December 31,December 31,
2014 2013 20122016 2015 2014
(Dollars in thousands)(Dollars in thousands)
Individually evaluated for impairment$29,116
 $47,018
 53,110
$4,640
 $21,277
 $29,116
Collectively evaluated for impairment2,428,605
 2,560,680
 2,605,773
2,485,979
 2,428,632
 2,428,605
Total loans evaluated for impairment$2,457,721
 $2,607,698
 2,658,883
$2,490,619
 $2,449,909
 $2,457,721
Charge-offs include allowances that have been established on loans that were satisfied either by taking ownership of the collateral.collateral or by some other means such as discounted pay-off or loan sale. When ownership of the property is taken it is recorded at the lower of the mortgage loan's carrying value or the property's fair value (based on appraised values) less estimated costs to sell. The real estate owned is recorded as a component of other investments and the mortgage loan is recorded as fully paid, with any allowance for credit loss that has been established charged off. Fair value of the real estate is determined by third party appraisal. Recoveries are situations where we have received a payment from the borrower in an amount greater than the carrying value of the loan (principal outstanding less specific allowance).
During the yearsyear ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012, seven five and thirteen mortgage loans respectively, were satisfied by taking ownership of theany real estate serving as collateral. The following table summarizes the activity in the real estate owned, included in Other investments, which was obtained in satisfaction of mortgage loans on real estate:
Year Ended December 31,Year Ended December 31,
2014 2013 20122016 2015 2014
(Dollars in thousands)(Dollars in thousands)
Real estate owned at beginning of period$22,844
 $33,172
 $36,821
$6,485
 $20,238
 $22,844
Real estate acquired in satisfaction of mortgage loans14,555
 8,217
 26,324

 
 14,555
Additions
 626
 398

 121
 
Sales(14,134) (17,358) (23,825)(6,444) (12,322) (14,134)
Impairments(2,441) (1,195) (5,677)
 (1,297) (2,441)
Depreciation(586) (618) (869)(41) (255) (586)
Real estate owned at end of period$20,238
 $22,844
 $33,172
$
 $6,485
 $20,238

F-27

Table of Contents
AMERICAN EQUITY INVESTMENT LIFE HOLDING COMPANY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)


We analyze credit risk of our mortgage loans by analyzing all available evidence on loans that are delinquent and loans that are in a workout period.
December 31,December 31,
2014 20132016 2015
(Dollars in thousands)(Dollars in thousands)
Credit Exposure--By Payment Activity      
Performing$2,451,760
 2,593,276
$2,489,028
 $2,438,341
In workout
 6,248
1,591
 11,568
Delinquent
 

 
Collateral dependent5,961
 8,174

 
$2,457,721
 $2,607,698
$2,490,619
 $2,449,909

F-28

Table of Contents
AMERICAN EQUITY INVESTMENT LIFE HOLDING COMPANY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)


The loans that are categorized as "in workout" consist of loans that we have agreed to lower or no mortgage payments for a period of time while the borrowers address cash flow and/or operational issues. The key features of these workouts have been determined on a loan-by-loan basis. Most of these loans are in a period of low cash flow due to tenants vacating their space or tenants requesting rent relief during difficult economic periods. Generally, we have allowed the borrower a six month interest only period and in some cases a twelve month period of interest only. Interest only workout loans are expected to return to their regular debt service payments after the interest only period. Interest only loans that are not fully amortizing will have a larger balance at their balloon date than originally contracted. Fully amortizing loans that are in interest only periods will have larger debt service payments for their remaining term due to lost principal payments during the interest only period. In limited circumstances we have allowed borrowers to pay the principal portion of their loan payment into an escrow account that can be used for capital and tenant improvements for a period of not more than twelve months. In these situations new loan amortization schedules are calculated based on the principal not collected during this twelve month workout period and larger payments are collected for the remaining term of each loan. In all cases, the original interest rate and maturity date have not been modified, and we have not forgiven any principal amounts.
Mortgage loans are considered delinquent when they become 60 days or more past due. WhenIn general, when loans become 90 days past due, become collateral dependent or enter a period with no debt service payments required we place them on non-accrual status and discontinue recognizing interest income. If payments are received on a delinquent loan, interest income is recognized to the extent it would have been recognized if normal principal and interest would have been received timely. If the payments are received to bring a delinquent loan back to current we will resume accruing interest income on that loan. Outstanding principal ofThere were no loans in a non-accrual status at December 31, 2014 and 2013 totaled $6.0 million and $8.2 million, respectively.2016 or 2015.
We define collateral dependent loans as those mortgage loans for which we will depend on the value of the collateral real estate to satisfy the outstanding principal of the loan.
All of our commercial mortgage loans depend on the cash flow of the borrower to be at a sufficient level to service the principal and interest payments as they come due. In general, cash inflows of the borrowers are generated by collecting monthly rent from tenants occupying space within the borrowers' properties. Our borrowers face collateral risks such as tenants going out of business, tenants struggling to make rent payments as they become due, and tenants canceling leases and moving to other locations. We have a number of loans where the real estate is occupied by a single tenant. Our borrowers sometimes face both a reduction in cash flow on their mortgage property as well as a reduction in the fair value of the real estate collateral. If borrowers are unable to replace lost rent revenue and increases in the fair value of their property do not materialize we could potentially incur more losses than what we have allowed for in our specific and general loan loss allowances.
Aging of financing receivables is summarized in the following table, with loans in a "workout" period as of the reporting date considered current if payments are current in accordance with agreed upon terms:
 30 - 59 Days 60 - 89 Days 
90 Days
and Over
 
Total
Past Due
 Current 
Collateral
Dependent
Receivables
 
Total
Financing
Receivables
 (Dollars in thousands)
Commercial Mortgage Loans             
December 31, 2014$
 $
 $
 $
 $2,451,760
 $5,961
 $2,457,721
December 31, 2013$
 $
 $
 $
 $2,599,524
 $8,174
 $2,607,698
 30 - 59 Days 60 - 89 Days 
90 Days
and Over
 
Total
Past Due
 Current 
Collateral
Dependent
Receivables
 
Total
Financing
Receivables
 (Dollars in thousands)
Commercial Mortgage Loans             
December 31, 2016$2,737
 $
 $
 $2,737
 $2,487,882
 $
 $2,490,619
December 31, 2015$
 $
 $
 $
 $2,449,909
 $
 $2,449,909

F-28

Table of Contents
AMERICAN EQUITY INVESTMENT LIFE HOLDING COMPANY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)


Financing receivables summarized in the following two tables represent all loans that we are either not currently collecting, or those we feel it is probable we will not collect all amounts due according to the contractual terms of the loan agreements (all loans that we have worked with the borrower to alleviate short-term cash flow issues, loans delinquent for more than 60 days or more at the reporting date, loans we have determined to be collateral dependent and loans that we have recorded specific impairments on that we feel may continue to have performance issues).
Recorded Investment Unpaid Principal Balance Related AllowanceRecorded Investment Unpaid Principal Balance 
Related
Allowance
(Dollars in thousands)(Dollars in thousands)
December 31, 2014     
December 31, 2016     
Mortgage loans with an allowance$16,783
 $29,116
 $(12,333)$3,313
 $4,640
 $(1,327)
Mortgage loans with no related allowance2,656
 2,656
 
1,591
 1,591
 
$19,439
 $31,772
 $(12,333)$4,904
 $6,231
 $(1,327)
December 31, 2013     
December 31, 2015     
Mortgage loans with an allowance$30,171
 $47,018
 $(16,847)$13,435
 $21,277
 $(7,842)
Mortgage loans with no related allowance3,264
 3,264
 
8,859
 8,859
 
$33,435
 $50,282
 $(16,847)$22,294
 $30,136
 $(7,842)

F-29

Table of Contents
AMERICAN EQUITY INVESTMENT LIFE HOLDING COMPANY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)


Average Recorded Investment Interest Income RecognizedAverage Recorded Investment Interest Income Recognized
(Dollars in thousands)
December 31, 2016   
Mortgage loans with an allowance$3,398
 $301
Mortgage loans with no related allowance1,665
 73
$5,063
 $374
December 31, 2015   
Mortgage loans with an allowance$13,893
 $1,117
Mortgage loans with no related allowance8,930
 584
(Dollars in thousands)$22,823
 $1,701
December 31, 2014      
Mortgage loans with an allowance$18,465
 $1,797
$18,465
 $1,797
Mortgage loans with no related allowance2,656
 43
2,656
 43
$21,121
 $1,840
$21,121
 $1,840
December 31, 2013   
Mortgage loans with an allowance$33,772
 $2,094
Mortgage loans with no related allowance3,264
 138
$37,036
 $2,232
December 31, 2012   
Mortgage loans with an allowance$37,480
 $1,946
Mortgage loans with no related allowance27,696
 1,664
$65,176
 $3,610
A Troubled Debt Restructuring ("TDR") is a situation where we have granted a concession to a borrower for economic or legal reasons related to the borrower's financial difficulties that we would not otherwise consider. A mortgage loan that has been granted new terms, including workout terms as described previously, would be considered a TDR if it meets conditions that would indicate a borrower is experiencing financial difficulty and the new terms constitute a concession on our part. We analyze all loans where we have agreed to workout terms and all loans that we have refinanced to determine if they meet the definition of a TDR. We consider the following factors in determining whether or not a borrower is experiencing financial difficulty:
borrower is in default,
borrower has declared bankruptcy,
there is growing concern about the borrower's ability to continue as a going concern,
borrower has insufficient cash flows to service debt,
borrower's inability to obtain funds from other sources, and
there is a breach of financial covenants by the borrower.
If the borrower is determined to be in financial difficulty, we consider the following conditions to determine if the borrower was granted a concession:
assets used to satisfy debt are less than our recorded investment,
interest rate is modified,
maturity date extension at an interest rate less than market rate,
capitalization of interest,
delaying principal and/or interest for a period of three months or more, and
partial forgiveness of the balance or charge-off.

F-30F-29

Table of Contents
AMERICAN EQUITY INVESTMENT LIFE HOLDING COMPANY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)


Mortgage loan workouts, refinances or restructures that are classified as TDRs are individually evaluated and measured for impairment. A summary of mortgage loans on commercial real estate with outstanding principal at December 31, 20142016 and 20132015 that we determined to be TDRs are as follows:
Geographic Region 
Number of
TDRs
 
Principal
Balance
Outstanding
 
Specific Loan
Loss Allowance
 
Net
Carrying
Amount
 
Number of
TDRs
 
Principal
Balance
Outstanding
 
Specific Loan
Loss Allowance
 
Net
Carrying
Amount
 (Dollars in thousands) (Dollars in thousands)
Year ended December 31, 2014:      
Year ended December 31, 2016      
South Atlantic 1 $3,004
 $
 $3,004
East North Central 1 2,020
 (467) 1,553
 2 $5,024
 $(467) $4,557
      
Year ended December 31, 2015      
South Atlantic 7 $14,475
 $(4,244) $10,231
 6 $11,155
 $(2,992) $8,163
East North Central 1 2,177
 (467) 1,710
 2 3,306
 (467) 2,839
West North Central 1 1,881
 (1,047) 834
 1 5,913
 
 5,913
 9 $18,533
 $(5,758) $12,775
 9 $20,374
 $(3,459) $16,915
      
Year ended December 31, 2013:      
East 1 $3,712
 $(949) $2,763
Mountain 7 22,140
 (329) 21,811
South Atlantic 7 13,930
 (4,177) 9,753
East North Central 1 2,219
 (467) 1,752
West North Central 1 1,938
 (475) 1,463
West South Central 1 1,714
 (256) 1,458
 18 $45,653
 $(6,653) $39,000
5.     Derivative Instruments
We recognize all derivative instruments as assets or liabilities in the consolidated balance sheets at fair value. None of our derivatives qualify for hedge accounting, thus, any change in the fair value of the derivatives is recognized immediately in the consolidated statements of operations. The fair value of our derivative instruments, including derivative instruments embedded in fixed index annuity contracts, and derivative instruments embedded in a convertible debt issue, presented in the consolidated balance sheets are as follows:
December 31,December 31,
2014 20132016 2015
(Dollars in thousands)(Dollars in thousands)
Assets      
Derivative instruments      
Call options$731,113
 $856,050
$830,519
 $337,256
Other assets      
2015 notes hedges30,291
 107,041
Interest rate caps2,778
 6,103
1,082
 1,410
Interest rate swap
 712
$764,182
 $969,906
$831,601
 $338,666
Liabilities      
Policy benefit reserves—annuity products      
Fixed index annuities—embedded derivatives$5,574,653
 $4,406,163
$6,563,288
 $5,983,622
Other liabilities      
2015 notes embedded conversion derivative (see Note 9)30,291
 107,041
Interest rate swap2,644
 
2,113
 3,139
$5,607,588
 $4,513,204
$6,565,401
 $5,986,761

F-31

Table of Contents
AMERICAN EQUITY INVESTMENT LIFE HOLDING COMPANY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)


The changes in fair value of derivatives included in the consolidated statements of operations are as follows:
Year Ended December 31,Year Ended December 31,
2014 2013 20122016 2015 2014
(Dollars in thousands)(Dollars in thousands)
Change in fair value of derivatives:          
Call options$521,947
 $932,003
 $228,610
$165,029
 $(327,921) $521,947
2015 notes hedges(8,934) 145,751
 (2,488)
 (4,516) (8,934)
2015 warrants
 (9,568) 
Interest rate swap(4,863) 4,973
 (4,261)(482) (2,341) (4,863)
Interest rate caps(3,325) 2,856
 (723)(328) (1,368) (3,325)
$504,825
 $1,076,015
 $221,138
$164,219
 $(336,146) $504,825
Change in fair value of embedded derivatives:          
Fixed index annuities—embedded derivatives$47,548
 $(8,006) $289,387
Fixed index annuities—embedded derivatives (see Note 2)$145,045
 $(825,668) $(532,337)
Other changes in difference between policy benefit reserves computed using derivative accounting vs. long-duration contracts accounting398,420
 365,486
 579,885
2015 notes embedded conversion derivative (see Note 9)(19,036) 141,974
 (2,488)
 (4,516) (19,036)
2029 notes embedded conversion derivative (see Note 9)3,809
 
 

 
 3,809
$32,321
 $133,968
 $286,899
$543,465
 $(464,698) $32,321
The amounts presented as "Other changes in difference between policy benefit reserves computed using derivative accounting vs. long-duration contracts accounting" represents the total change in the difference between policy benefit reserves for fixed index annuities computed under the derivative accounting standard and the long-duration contracts accounting standard at each balance sheet date, less the change in fair value of our fixed index annuities embedded derivatives that is presented as Level 3 liabilities in Note 2.
We have fixed index annuity products that guarantee the return of principal to the policyholder and credit interest based on a percentage of the gain in a specified market index. When fixed index annuity deposits are received, a portion of the deposit is used to purchase derivatives consisting of call options on the applicable market indices to fund the index credits due to fixed index annuity policyholders. Substantially all such call options are one year options purchased to match the funding requirements of the underlying policies. The call options are marked to fair value with the change in fair value included as a component of revenues. The change in fair value of derivatives includes the gains or losses recognized at the expiration of the option term or upon early termination and the changes in fair value for open positions. On the respective anniversary dates of the index policies, the index used to compute the annual index credit is reset and we purchase new one-year call options to fund the next annual index credit. We manage the cost of these purchases through the terms of our fixed index annuities, which permit us to change caps, participation rates, and/or asset fees, subject to guaranteed minimums on each policy's anniversary date. By adjusting caps, participation rates, or asset fees, we can generally manage option costs except in cases where the contractual features would prevent further modifications.
Our strategy attempts to mitigate any potential risk of loss underdue to the nonperformance of the counterparties to these agreementscall options through a regular monitoring process which evaluates the program's effectiveness. We do not purchase call options that would require payment or collateral to another institution and our call options do not contain counterparty credit-risk-related contingent features. We are exposed to risk of loss in the event of nonperformance by the counterparties and, accordingly, we purchase our option contracts from multiple counterparties and evaluate the creditworthiness of all counterparties prior to purchase of the contracts. All of these options have been purchased from nationally recognized financial institutions with a Standard and Poor's credit rating of A- or higher at the time of purchase and the maximum credit exposure to any single counterparty is subject to concentration limits. We also have credit support agreements that allow us to request the counterparty to provide collateral to us when the fair value of our exposure to the counterparty exceeds specified amounts.

F-32F-30

Table of Contents
AMERICAN EQUITY INVESTMENT LIFE HOLDING COMPANY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)


The notional amount and fair value of our call options by counterparty and each counterparty's current credit rating are as follows:
 December 31, December 31,
 2014 2013 2016 2015
Counterparty Credit Rating (S&P) Credit Rating (Moody's) 
Notional
Amount
 Fair Value 
Notional
Amount
 Fair Value Credit Rating (S&P) Credit Rating (Moody's) 
Notional
Amount
 Fair Value 
Notional
Amount
 Fair Value
 (Dollars in thousands) (Dollars in thousands)
Bank of America A A2 $2,114,812
 $62,932
 $1,683,911
 $73,836
 A+ A1 $5,958,884
 $178,477
 $6,257,861
 $67,662
Barclays A A2 4,083,259
 135,609
 2,396,839
 113,513
 A- A1 3,441,832
 89,721
 2,463,768
 35,273
BNP Paribas A+ A1 1,321,136
 42,644
 1,382,661
 38,849
 A A1 1,199,265
 19,598
 1,520,710
 16,944
Citibank, N.A. A A2 3,190,204
 96,759
 1,536,547
 72,310
 A+ A1 4,038,528
 97,094
 3,786,498
 23,587
Credit Suisse A A1 2,354,811
 75,381
 4,060,352
 193,304
 A A1 2,130,710
 44,242
 1,278,492
 12,508
Deutsche Bank A A3 2,682,960
 64,028
 747,587
 41,074
 BBB+ Baa2 25,935
 892
 1,349,002
 10,704
HSBC AA- A1 38,599
 1,767
 200,011
 10,518
J.P. Morgan A+ Aa3 401,804
 13,488
 786,429
 36,863
 A+ Aa3 1,785,583
 19,645
 838,982
 5,283
Morgan Stanley A- Baa2 2,605,687
 77,106
 3,546,487
 150,437
 A+ A1 2,543,421
 64,425
 3,465,457
 33,171
Royal Bank of Canada AA- Aa3 1,364,362
 41,717
 714,941
 25,140
 AA- Aa3 3,384,310
 103,510
 2,820,410
 48,654
SunTrust BBB+ A3 248,622
 5,405
 
 
 A- Baa1 2,375,418
 72,990
 1,308,434
 20,028
Wells Fargo AA- Aa3 3,550,188
 114,277
 2,221,874
 100,206
 AA- Aa2 3,850,842
 130,545
 4,187,955
 63,442
Exchange traded 313,354
 9,380
 
 
 $23,956,444
 $731,113
 $19,277,639
 $856,050
 $31,048,082
 $830,519
 $29,277,569
 $337,256
As of December 31, 20142016 and 2013,2015, we held $743.0$827.8 million and $818.2$349.8 million, respectively, of cash and cash equivalents and other securities from counterparties for derivative collateral, which is included in other liabilities on our consolidated balance sheets. This derivative collateral limits the maximum amount of economic loss due to credit risk that we would incur if parties to the call options failed completely to perform according to the terms of the contracts to $47.4$55.5 million and $71.7$36.9 million at December 31, 20142016 and 2013,2015, respectively.
The future annual index credits on our fixed index annuities are treated as a "series of embedded derivatives" over the expected life of the applicable contract. We do not purchase call options to fund the index liabilities which may arise after the next policy anniversary date. We must value both the call options and the related forward embedded options in the policies at fair value. During the year ended December 31, 2014, we revised future period assumptions for lapse rates and the expected costs of annual call options used in determining fixed index annuity embedded derivatives. These revisions decreased the change in fair value of embedded derivatives for the year ended December 31, 2014 by $62.6 million, which after related adjustments to deferred sales inducements and deferred policy acquisition costs and income taxes, increased net income by $14.8 million.
We entered into an interest rate swap and interest rate caps to manage interest rate risk associated with the floating rate component on certain of our subordinated debentures. See Note 10 for more information on our subordinated debentures. The terms of the interest rate swap provide that we pay a fixed rate of interest and receive a floating rate of interest. The terms of the interest rate caps limit the three month London Interbank Offered Rate ("LIBOR") to 2.50%. The interest rate swap and caps are not effective hedges under accounting guidance for derivative instruments and hedging activities. Therefore, we record the interest rate swap and caps at fair value and any net cash payments received or paid are included in the change in fair value of derivatives in the consolidated statements of operations.
Details regarding the interest rate swap are as follows:
   December 31,   December 31,
   2014 2013   2016 2015
Maturity Date 
Notional
Amount
 Receive Rate Pay Rate Counterparty Fair Value Fair Value 
Notional
Amount
 Receive Rate Pay Rate Counterparty Fair Value Fair Value
         (Dollars in thousands)         (Dollars in thousands)
March 15, 2021 $85,500
 LIBOR 2.415% SunTrust $(2,644) $712
 $85,500
 LIBOR 2.415% SunTrust $(2,113) $(3,139)

F-33F-31

Table of Contents
AMERICAN EQUITY INVESTMENT LIFE HOLDING COMPANY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)


Details regarding the interest rate caps are as follows:
   December 31,   December 31,
   2014 2013   2016 2015
Maturity Date Notional Amount Floating Rate Cap Rate Counterparty Fair Value Fair Value Notional Amount Floating Rate Cap Rate Counterparty Fair Value Fair Value
         (Dollars in thousands)         (Dollars in thousands)
July 7, 2021 $40,000
 LIBOR 2.50% SunTrust $1,398
 $3,073
 $40,000
 LIBOR 2.50% SunTrust $542
 $708
July 8, 2021 12,000
 LIBOR 2.50% SunTrust 420
 923
 12,000
 LIBOR 2.50% SunTrust 163
 212
July 29, 2021 27,000
 LIBOR 2.50% SunTrust 960
 2,107
 27,000
 LIBOR 2.50% SunTrust 377
 490
 $79,000
 $2,778
 $6,103
 $79,000
 $1,082
 $1,410
The interest rate swap converts floating rates to fixed rates for seven years which began in March 2014. The interest rate caps cap our interest rates for seven years which began in July 2014. As of December 31, 2016, we deposited $0.7 million of collateral with the counterparty to the swap and caps.
In September 2010, concurrently with the issuance of $200.0 million principal amount of 3.50% Convertible Senior Notes due September 15, 2015 (the "2015 notes"), we entered into hedge transactions (the "2015 notes hedges") with two counterparties whereby we would receive the cash equivalent of the conversion spread on 16.0 million shares of our common stock based upon a strike price of $12.50 per share, subject to certain conversion rate adjustments in the 2015 notes. The number of shares and strike price of the 2015 notes hedges arewere subject to adjustment based on dividends we paypaid subsequent to their purchase. The 2015 notes hedges expireexpired on September 15, 2015, and must be settledwe received $25.8 million in cash. The 2015 notes hedges arewere accounted for as derivative assets and arewere included in other assets in our consolidated balance sheets. The 2015 notes embedded conversion derivative liability was settled with the extinguishment of the 2015 notes (see Note 9) whereby we paid holders of the notes a total of $25.8 million in cash to settle the conversion premium. The 2015 notes hedges and 2015 notes embedded conversion derivative arewere adjusted to fair value each reporting period and unrealized gains and losses are reflected in our consolidated statements of operations.
In separate transactions, we sold warrants (the "2015 warrants") to the 2015 notes hedges counterparties for the purchase of up to 16.0 million shares of our common stock at a price of $16.00 per share. We received $15.6 million in cash proceeds from the sale of the 2015 warrants, which was recorded as an increase in additional paid-in capital. The number of shares and strike price of the warrants arewere subject to adjustment based on dividends we paypaid subsequent to selling the warrants. The warrants expireexpired on various dates from December 2015 through March 2016 and are intended to be settled in net shares.June 2016. Changes in the fair value of these warrants willwere not be recognized in our consolidated financial statements as long as the instruments remain classified as equity.
In December 2015, we began settling the 2015 warrants in net shares on a weekly basis, and completed the settlement of all warrants by June 30, 2016. 140,866 shares of our common stock were delivered to holders of the expiring warrants, of which 92,998 shares were issued during 2016. 2015 warrants remained outstanding on 1.6 million shares of our common stock at a strike price of $15.59 per share at December 31, 2015. As the average price of our common stock exceeded the strike price of the 2015 warrants while they were outstanding the dilutive effect of the 2015 warrants has been included in diluted earnings per share for the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014.
In 2014, we entered into five separate partial unwind agreements with the counterparties to the 2015 notes hedges and the 2015 warrants to coincide with the extinguishment of a portion of our 2015 notes (see Note 9) whereby we agreed to settle the related 2015 notes hedges and the 2015 warrants and received net cash from the counterparties totaling $16.6 million. The agreements to settle the 2015 warrants in cash required us to reclassify $51.3 million from equity to a derivative liability which represented the fair value of the 2015 warrants committed to the unwind on the day that we entered into the unwind agreements. The fair value of these warrants did not change after reclassification as they were settled in cash at the time the agreements were executed.
In 2013, we entered into three separate partial unwind agreements with the counterparties to the 2015 notes hedges and the 2015 warrants to coincide with the extinguishment of a portion of our 2015 notes (see Note 9) whereby we agreed to settle the related 2015 notes hedges and the 2015 warrants and received net cash from the counterparties totaling $22.2 million. The agreements to settle the 2015 warrants in cash required us to reclassify $48.0 million from equity to a derivative liability which represented the fair value of the 2015 warrants committed to the unwind on the day that we entered into the unwind agreements. Subsequent to the reclassification, we were required to recognize any change in fair value of the 2015 warrants committed to the unwind agreements through net income.
At December 31, 2014, as a result of the partial unwind transactions and cash dividend adjustments, we had 2015 notes hedges and 2015 warrants outstanding on 1.8 million shares of our common stock at strike prices of $12.25 and $15.68 per share, respectively.
The average price of our common stock has exceeded the strike price of the 2015 warrants in each quarter of 2014 and the last two quarters of 2013 and the dilutive effect of the 2015 warrants has been included in diluted earnings per share for the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013. The 2015 warrants were not dilutive for the year ended December 31, 2012.

F-34

Table of Contents

6.     Deferred Policy Acquisition Costs and Deferred Sales Inducements
Policy acquisition costs deferred and amortized are as follows:
December 31,December 31,
2014 2013 20122016 2015 2014
(Dollars in thousands)(Dollars in thousands)
Balance at beginning of year$2,426,652
 $1,709,799
 $1,683,857
$2,905,136
 $2,058,556
 $2,426,652
Costs deferred during the year:          
Commissions421,802
 420,378
 399,001
538,863
 651,094
 421,802
Policy issue costs5,080
 5,422
 4,410
4,462
 6,545
 5,080
Amortization(163,578) (365,468) (164,919)(374,012) (286,114) (163,578)
Effect of net unrealized gains/losses(631,400) 656,521
 (212,550)(169,072) 475,055
 (631,400)
Balance at end of year$2,058,556
 $2,426,652
 $1,709,799
$2,905,377
 $2,905,136
 $2,058,556
Sales inducements deferred and amortized are as follows:
December 31,December 31,
2014 2013 20122016 2015 2014
(Dollars in thousands)(Dollars in thousands)
Balance at beginning of year$1,875,880
 $1,292,341
 $1,242,787
$2,232,148
 $1,587,257
 $1,875,880
Costs deferred during the year330,079
 337,787
 306,659
353,966
 486,924
 330,079
Amortization(131,419) (253,113) (87,157)(251,166) (209,390) (131,419)
Effect of net unrealized gains/losses(487,283) 498,865
 (169,948)(126,730) 367,357
 (487,283)
Balance at end of year$1,587,257
 $1,875,880
 $1,292,341
$2,208,218
 $2,232,148
 $1,587,257
We periodically revise the key assumptions used in the calculation of amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs and deferred sales inducements retrospectively through an unlocking process when estimates of current or future gross profits/margins (including the impact of realized investment gains and losses) to be realized from a group of products are revised. The unlocking adjustments in 2016 increased amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs by $48.2 million and amortization of deferred sales inducements by $35.8 million. We review these assumptions quarterly and as a result of this review we made adjustments in the first and third quarters of 2016. During the first quarter of 2016, we made adjustments to lower future spread assumptions after comparing investment spread assumptions to actual investment spreads earned in the three months ended December 31, 2015 and March 31, 2016 and determining that decreases in the average yield earned on invested assets resulting from the continued low interest rate environment was creating shortfalls in investment spread and gross profits. During the third quarter of 2016, we made adjustments to extend the period of time in which we assume investment spread will grade up to our long-term spread targets by an additional two years as yields obtained on investments purchased in the third quarter of 2016 were much lower than we had anticipated as a result of the overall decline in investment yields that followed the Brexit vote. In addition, during the third quarter of 2016, revisions to assumptions used in determining reserves held for living income benefit riders resulted in a decrease in estimated future gross profits.
The unlocking adjustment in 2015 decreased amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs by $11.0 million and amortization of deferred sales inducements by $5.6 million and included the impact of account balance true-ups as of September 30, 2015, which have been favorable to us due to stronger equity market performance than we assumed, favorable adjustments to lapse assumptions to reflect better persistency experienced than assumed and unfavorable adjustments to investment spread to reflect lower spreads being earned than assumed. In 2015, the favorable impact of the account balance true-up and lapse assumption change was largely offset by reductions in estimated future gross profits attributable to revisions to the assumptions for the lifetime income benefit rider liability. The unlocking adjustment in 2014 decreased amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs by $35.5 million and amortization offor deferred sales inducements by $12.6 million and included the impact of account balance true upsvalue true-ups as of September 30, 2014 and adjustmentadjustments to future period assumptions for interest margins, surrenders and certain expenses. The unlocking adjustment in 2013 decreased amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs by $18.5 million and amortization for deferred sales inducements by $11.1 million and included the impact of account balance true-ups and adjustment to future period assumptions for surrenders and certain expenses. The unlocking adjustment in 2012 increased amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs by $3.7 million and decreased amortization for deferred sales inducements by $0.2 million.
7.     Reinsurance and Policy Provisions
Coinsurance
We have two coinsurance agreements with EquiTrust Life Insurance Company ("EquiTrust"), covering 70% of certain of American Equity Life's fixed index and fixed rate annuities issued from August 1, 2001 through December 31, 2001, 40% of those contracts issued during 2002 and 2003, and 20% of those contracts issued from January 1, 2004 to July 31, 2004. The business reinsured under these agreements may not be recaptured. Coinsurance deposits (aggregate policy benefit reserves transferred to EquiTrust under these agreements) were $0.9$0.7 billion and $0.9$0.8 billion at December 31, 20142016 and 2013,2015, respectively. We remain liable to policyholders with respect to the policy liabilities ceded to EquiTrust should EquiTrust fail to meet the obligations it has coinsured. None of the coinsurance deposits with EquiTrust are deemed by management to be uncollectible. The balance due under these agreements to EquiTrust was $15.2$9.7 million and $20.7$2.5 million at December 31, 20142016 and 2013,2015, respectively, and represents the fair value of call options held by us to fund index credits related to the ceded business net of cash due to or from EquiTrust related to monthly settlements of policy activity and other expenses.

F-35F-33

Table of Contents
AMERICAN EQUITY INVESTMENT LIFE HOLDING COMPANY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)


We have three coinsurance agreements with Athene Life Re Ltd. ("Athene"), an unauthorized life reinsurer domiciled in Bermuda. One agreement cedesceded 20% of certain of American Equity Life's fixed index annuities issued from January 1, 2009 through March 31, 2010. The business reinsured under this agreement is not eligible for recapture until the end of the month following seven years after the date of issuance of the policy. The second agreement cedesceded 80% of American Equity Life's multi-year rate guaranteed annuities issued from July 1, 2009 through December 31, 2013 and 80% of Eagle Life's multi-year rate guaranteed annuities issued from November 20, 2013 through December 31, 2013. The business reinsured under this agreement may not be recaptured. The third agreement cedes 80% of American Equity Life's and Eagle Life's multi-year rate guaranteed annuities issued on or after January 1, 2014, and 80% of Eagle Life's fixed index annuities.annuities issued on or after January 1, 2014 and 80% of certain of American Equity Life's fixed index annuities issued from August 1, 2016 through December 31, 2016. The reinsurance agreement specifies that the coinsurance percentage for Eagle Life's fixed index annuities decreases to 50% for policies issued between January 1, 20162017 and December 31, 2018, and to 20% for policies issued on or after January 1, 2019. The business reinsured under this agreement may not be recaptured. Coinsurance deposits (aggregate policy benefit reserves transferred to Athene under these agreements) were $2.2$3.9 billion and $2.1$2.4 billion at December 31, 20142016 and 2013,2015, respectively. American Equity Life is an intermediary for reinsurance of the Eagle Life's business ceded to Athene. American Equity Life and Eagle Life remain liable to policyholders with respect to the policy liabilities ceded to Athene should Athene fail to meet the obligations it has coinsured. The annuity deposits that have been ceded to Athene are held in trusts and American Equity Life is named as the sole beneficiary of the trusts. The assets in the trusts are required to remain at a value that is sufficient to support the current balance of policy benefit liabilities of the ceded business on a statutory basis. If the value of the trust accounts would ever reach a point where it isbe less than the amount of the ceded policy benefit liabilities on a statutory basis, Athene is required to either establish a letter of credit or deposit securities in the trusts for the amount of any shortfall. None of the coinsurance deposits with Athene are deemed by management to be uncollectible. The balance due under these agreements to Athene was $21.9$45.8 million and $27.3$12.7 million at December 31, 20142016 and 2013,2015, respectively, and represents the fair value of call options held by us to fund index credits related to the ceded business net of cash due from Athene related to monthly settlements of policy activity.
Amounts ceded to EquiTrust and Athene under these agreements are as follows:
Year Ended December 31,Year Ended December 31,
2014 2013 20122016 2015 2014
(Dollars in thousands)(Dollars in thousands)
Consolidated Statements of Operations          
Annuity product charges$5,956
 $6,551
 $6,796
$5,366
 $5,427
 $5,956
Change in fair value of derivatives31,076
 60,876
 17,106
18,446
 (14,360) 31,076
$37,032
 $67,427
 $23,902
$23,812
 $(8,933) $37,032
          
Interest sensitive and index product benefits$122,666
 $117,934
 $94,113
$93,487
 $88,923
 $122,666
Change in fair value of embedded derivatives35,820
 2,898
 9,373
23,848
 (22,616) 35,820
Other operating costs and expenses9,241
 9,926
 9,333
24,039
 9,922
 9,241
$167,727
 $130,758
 $112,819
$141,374
 $76,229
 $167,727
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows          
Annuity deposits$(171,124) $(182,616) $(203,552)$(1,736,054) $(471,822) $(171,124)
Cash payments to policyholders280,308
 208,345
 208,437
418,499
 391,045
 280,308
$109,184
 $25,729
 $4,885
$(1,317,555) $(80,777) $109,184
Financing Arrangements
We have twoa reinsurance transactionstransaction with Hannover Life Reassurance Company of America ("Hannover"), which areis treated as reinsurance under statutory accounting practices and as a financing arrangementsarrangement under GAAP. The statutory surplus benefitsbenefit under these agreements arethis agreement is eliminated under GAAP and the associated charges are recorded as risk charges and included in other operating costs and expenses in the consolidated statements of operations. The transactionstransaction became effective March 31, 2011 (the "2011 Hannover Transaction") and July 1, 2013 (the "2013 Hannover Transaction").
The 20112013 Hannover Transaction, is a coinsurance and yearly renewable term reinsurance agreement for statutory purposes and provided $49.2 million in net pretax statutory surplus benefit at inception in 2011. The 2011 Hannover Transaction terminates on March 31,which was amended effective October 1, 2016, and the statutory surplus benefit is reduced over a five year period and is eliminated upon termination. Pursuant to the terms of this agreement, pretax statutory surplus was reduced by $10.8 million, $11.3 million and $11.8 million in 2014, 2013 and 2012, respectively, and is expected to be reduced as follows: 2015—$10.3 million and 2016—$2.5 million. These amounts include risk charges equal to 1.25% of the pretax statutory surplus benefit as of the end of each calendar quarter. Risk charges attributable to this agreement were $0.8 million, $1.3 million and $1.8 million during 2014, 2013 and 2012, respectively.

F-36

Table of Contents
AMERICAN EQUITY INVESTMENT LIFE HOLDING COMPANY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)


The 2013 Hannover Transaction is a yearly renewable term reinsurance agreement for statutory purposes covering 45.6% of waived surrender charges related to penalty free withdrawals, deaths and lifetime income benefit rider payments as well as lifetime income benefit rider payments in excess of policy fund values on certain business. We may recapture the risks reinsured under this agreement as of the end of any quarter after June 30, 2016. However,December 31, 2020 and the agreement, as amended, makes it punitive to us if we do not recapture the business ceded no later than the first quarter of 2018.2021. The reserve credit recorded on a statutory basis by American Equity Life was $322.5$638.1 million and $288.2$480.7 million at December 31, 20142016 and 2013,2015, respectively. We pay quarterly reinsurance premiums under this agreement with an experience refund calculated on a quarterly basis and a risk charge equal to 1.25% ofbased on the pretax statutory surplus benefit as of the end of each calendar quarter. Risk charges attributable to the 2013 Hannover Transaction were $15.7$27.7 million and $7.0$21.0 million during 20142016 and 2013.2015.
The 2013 Hannover Transaction replaces a similar reinsurance agreement with Hannover that was entered into in 2005 (the "2005 Hannover Agreement") which was recaptured simultaneously with entering into the 2013 Hannover Transaction. The 2005 Hannover Agreement was a yearly renewable term reinsurance agreement for statutory purposes covering 47%
F-34

Table of waived surrender charges related to penalty free withdrawals and deaths on certain business. Risk charges attributable to the 2005 Hannover Transaction were $5.4 million and $9.9 million during 2013 and 2012, respectively.Contents
AMERICAN EQUITY INVESTMENT LIFE HOLDING COMPANY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)


Prior to its recapture in 2013,2015, we had a coinsurance and yearly renewable term reinsurance agreement for statutory purposes that provided $29.5$49.2 million in net pretax statutory surplus benefit at inception in 20082011 (the "2008"2011 Hannover Transaction"). Pursuant to the terms of this agreement, pretax statutory surplus was reduced by $6.9$10.3 million and $6.8$10.8 million in 20132015 and 2012,2014, respectively. These amounts include risk charges equal to 1.25% of the pretax statutory surplus benefit as of the end of each calendar quarter. Risk charges attributable to the 20082011 Hannover Transaction were $0.1$0.3 million and $0.5$0.8 million during 20132015 and 2012,2014, respectively.
Indemnity Reinsurance
In the normal course of business, we seek to limit our exposure to loss on any single insured and to recover a portion of benefits paid under our annuity, life and accident and health insurance products by ceding reinsurance to other insurance enterprises or reinsurers. Reinsurance contracts do not relieve us of our obligations to our policyholders. To the extent that reinsuring companies are later unable to meet obligations under reinsurance agreements, our life insurance subsidiaries would be liable for these obligations, and payment of these obligations could result in losses to us. To limit the possibility of such losses, we evaluate the financial condition of our reinsurers, and monitor concentrations of credit risk. No allowance for uncollectible amounts has been established against our asset for amounts receivable from other insurance companies as none of the receivables are deemed by management to be uncollectible.
8.     Income Taxes
We file consolidated federal income tax returns that include all of our wholly-owned subsidiaries, except for 2009–2013 when Eagle Life filed a separate federal income tax return under applicable federal income tax guidelines.subsidiaries. Our income tax expense as presented in the consolidated financial statements is summarized as follows:
Year Ended December 31,Year Ended December 31,
2014 2013 20122016 2015 2014
(Dollars in thousands)(Dollars in thousands)
Consolidated statements of operations:          
Current income taxes$116,545
 $133,036
 $80,527
$57,412
 $75,568
 $116,545
Deferred income taxes (benefits)(46,504) 3,013
 (52,336)(10,408) 41,916
 (46,504)
Total income tax expense included in consolidated statements of operations70,041
 136,049
 28,191
47,004
 117,484
 70,041
Stockholders' equity:          
Expense (benefit) relating to:          
Change in net unrealized investment losses363,572
 (344,944) 123,620
74,471
 (279,860) 363,572
Share-based compensation(5,716) (4,043) (392)(527) (3,649) (5,716)
Extinguishment of convertible debt(9,284) (4,546) 

 
 (9,284)
Total income tax expense (benefit) included in consolidated financial statements$418,613
 $(217,484) $151,419
$120,948
 $(166,025) $418,613

F-37

Table of Contents
AMERICAN EQUITY INVESTMENT LIFE HOLDING COMPANY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)


Income tax expense in the consolidated statements of operations differed from the amount computed at the applicable statutory federal income tax rate of 35% as follows:
Year Ended December 31,Year Ended December 31,
2014 2013 20122016 2015 2014
(Dollars in thousands)(Dollars in thousands)
Income before income taxes$196,064
 $389,332
 $85,989
$130,247
 $337,314
 $196,064
          
Income tax expense on income before income taxes$68,622
 $136,266
 $30,096
$45,586
 $118,060
 $68,622
Tax effect of:          
State income taxes2,559
 2,924
 1,145
Tax exempt net investment income(3,669) (2,657) (1,876)(2,167) (3,834) (3,669)
Extinguishment of convertible debt4,202
 2,695
 

 
 4,202
Other886
 (255) (29)1,026
 334
 (259)
Income tax expense$70,041
 $136,049
 $28,191
$47,004
 $117,484
 $70,041
Effective tax rate35.7% 34.9% 32.8%36.1% 34.8% 35.7%

F-35

Table of Contents
AMERICAN EQUITY INVESTMENT LIFE HOLDING COMPANY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)


Deferred income tax assets or liabilities are established for temporary differences between the financial reporting amounts and tax bases of assets and liabilities that will result in deductible or taxable amounts, respectively, in future years. The tax effects of temporary differences that give rise to the deferred tax assets and liabilities at December 31, 20142016 and 2013,2015, are as follows:
December 31,December 31,
2014 20132016 2015
(Dollars in thousands)(Dollars in thousands)
Deferred income tax assets:      
Policy benefit reserves$2,052,968
 $1,875,516
$2,354,786
 $2,092,731
Other than temporary impairments753
 901
15,681
 7,801
Investment income items
 2,121
Derivative instruments
 91,638
Amounts due reinsurer680
 7,366
1,321
 
Other policyholder funds7,765
 9,200
6,474
 6,861
Litigation settlement accrual7,100
 7,420
1,709
 7,100
Deferred compensation10,565
 13,430
7,963
 8,346
Convertible senior notes12,281
 34,818
Share-based compensation5,407
 5,286
Net operating loss carryforwards17,694
 24,179
3,745
 6,637
Other11,685
 8,835
9,658
 8,031
Gross deferred tax assets2,121,491
 1,983,786
2,406,744
 2,234,431
Deferred income tax liabilities:      
Deferred policy acquisition costs and deferred sales inducements(1,637,607) (1,475,403)(1,951,333) (1,860,722)
Net unrealized gains on available for sale fixed maturity and equity securities(376,314) (12,742)(170,925) (96,454)
Derivative instruments(94,038) (193,067)(75,405) 
Amounts due reinsurer
 (9,677)
Investment income items(14,842) 
(39,118) (32,466)
Other(2,585) (718)(1,385) (2,429)
Gross deferred tax liabilities(2,125,386) (1,681,930)(2,238,166) (2,001,748)
Net deferred income tax (liability) asset$(3,895) $301,856
Net deferred income tax asset$168,578
 $232,683
Included in the deferred income taxes is the expected income tax benefit attributable to unrealized losses on available for sale fixed maturity securities. There is no valuation allowance provided for the deferred income tax asset attributable to unrealized losses on available for sale fixed maturity securities. Management expects that the passage of time will result in the reversal of these unrealized losses due to the fair value increasing as these securities near maturity. We have the intent and ability to hold these securities to maturity, because we generate adequate cash flow from new business to fund all foreseeable cash flow needs and do not believe it would be necessary to liquidate these securities at a loss to meet cash flow needs.
Realization of our deferred income tax assets is more likely than not based on expectations as to our future taxable income and considering all other available evidence, both positive and negative. Therefore, no valuation allowance against deferred income tax assets has been established as of December 31, 20142016 and 2013.2015.
There were no material income tax contingencies requiring recognition in our consolidated financial statements as of December 31, 2014.2016. We are no longer subject to income tax examinations by tax authorities for years prior to 2010.2012.

F-38

Table of Contents
AMERICAN EQUITY INVESTMENT LIFE HOLDING COMPANY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)


At December 31, 2014,2016, we hadhave no non-life net operating loss carryforwards remaining for federal income tax purposes totaling $28.1 million which expire beginning in 2018 through 2033.purposes.
9.     Notes and Loan Payable and Amounts Due Under Repurchase Agreements
Notes and loan payable includes the following:
    
 December 31,
 2016 2015
 (Dollars in thousands)
Senior notes due 2021   
Principal$400,000
 $400,000
Unamortized debt issue costs(5,733) (6,773)
Term loan due 2019   
Principal100,000
 
Unamortized debt issue costs(512) 
 $493,755
 $393,227
On July 17, 2013, we issued $400 million aggregate principal amount of senior unsecured notes due 2021 which bear interest at 6.625% per year and will mature on July 15, 2021. Contractual interest is payable semi-annually in arrears each January 15th and July 15th. The initial transaction fees and expenses totaling $9.0 million were capitalized as deferred financing costs and are being amortized over the term of the notes due 2021 using the effective interest method. We used $15 million of the net proceeds from the issuance to repay the entire amount outstanding under our revolving credit facility and the remainder of the net proceeds was used to pay the cash consideration portion of the convertible notes tender, exchange offers and redemption discussed below.
In September 2010, we issued $200.0 million principal amount of 2015 notes. The 2015 notes havehad a coupon interest rate of 3.5% per year, maturematured on September 15, 2015, and are intended to bewere settled in cash; however, in certain limited circumstances we havecash on the discretion to settle in shares of our common stock or a combination of cash and shares of our common stock.maturity date. Contractual interest payable on the 2015 notes began accruing in September 2010 and iswas payable semi-annually in arrears each March 15th and September 15th. The initial transaction fees and expenses totaling $6.8 million were capitalized as deferred financing costs and are beingwere amortized over the term of the 2015 notes using the effective interest method.
Upon occurrence of any of the conditions described below, holders may convert their 2015 notes at the applicable conversion rate at any time prior to June 15, 2015. On or after June 15, 2015 through the maturity date of September 15, 2015, holders may convert each of their 2015 notes at the applicable conversion rate regardless of the following conditions:
during the 5 business day period after any 10 consecutive trading day period (the “measurement period”) in which the trading price per $1,000 principal amount of notes was less than 98% of the product of the last reported sale price of our common stock and the applicable conversion rate on such trading day;
during any calendar quarter commencing after December 31, 2010, the Notes may be converted if the last reported price of the common stock for at least 20 trading days (whether or not consecutive) during the period of 30 consecutive trading days ending on the last trading day of the immediately preceding calendar quarter is greater than or equal to 130% of the applicable conversion price on each applicable trading day. The “last reported sale price” means the closing sale price per share (or if no closing sale price is reported, the average of the bid and ask prices or, if more than one in either case, the average of the average bid and the average ask prices) on that date as reported in composite transactions for the New York Stock Exchange; or
upon the occurrence of specified corporate transactions.
The initial conversion rate for the 2015 notes was 80 shares of our common stock per $1,000 principal amount of 2015 notes, equivalent to a conversion price of approximately $12.50 per share of our common stock, with the amount due on conversion. Upon conversion, a holder will receive the sum of the daily settlement amounts, calculated on a proportionate basis for each day, during a specified observation period following the conversion date. The conversion rate for the 2015 notes was adjusted to 80.9486 shares in December 2012, equivalent to a conversion price of approximately $12.35 per share. The conversion rate and conversion price have not been adjusted for cash dividends paid in December 2013 and December 2014 because the adjustments created by these cash dividend payments have been carried forward because they do not change the conversion rate by at least 1%.
If a fundamental change, as defined in the indenture, occurs prior to maturity and our stock price is at least $10.00 per share at that time, the conversion rate will increase by an additional amount of up to 20 shares of our common stock per $1,000 principal amount of 2015 notes, which amount would be paid to each holder that elects to convert its 2015 notes at that time.
The conversion option of the 2015 notes (the "2015 notes embedded conversion derivative") iswas an embedded derivative that requiresrequired bifurcation from the 2015 notes and iswas accounted for as a derivative liability, which iswas included in Other liabilities in our Consolidated Balance Sheets. The fair value of the 2015 notes embedded conversion derivative at the time of issuance of the 2015 notes was $37.0 million, and was recorded as the original debt discount for purposes of accounting for the debt component of the 2015 notes. This discount is beingwas amortized and recognized as interest expense using the effective interest method over the term of the 2015 notes.
In December 2009, we issued $115.8 million of contingent convertible senior notes due December 15, 2029 (the "2029 notes"), of which $15.6 million was assigned to the equity component (net of income tax of $11.0 million)., and was recorded as the original debt discount for purposes of accounting for the debt component of the 2029 notes. The 2029 notes had a coupon interest rate of 5.25% per annum. Interest was payable semi-annually in arrears on June 6 and December 6 of each year.
Our convertible notes are senior unsecured obligations and rank equally in right of payment with all existing and future senior indebtedness and senior to any existing and future subordinated indebtedness. Our convertible notes effectively rank junior in right of payment to any existing and future secured indebtedness to the extent of the value of the assets securing such secured indebtedness. Our convertible notes are structurally subordinated to all liabilities of our subsidiaries.

F-39

Table of Contents
AMERICAN EQUITY INVESTMENT LIFE HOLDING COMPANY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)


We arewere required to include the dilutive effect of the 2029 notes in our diluted earnings per share calculation. Because these notes includeincluded a mandatory cash settlement feature for the principal amount, incremental dilutive shares will only existexisted when the fair value of our common stock at the end of the reporting period exceedsexceeded the conversion price per share. The conversion premium of the 2029 notes was dilutive and the effect has beenwas included in diluted earnings per share for the yearsyear ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012.2014. The 2015 notes arewere excluded from the dilutive effect in our diluted earnings per share calculation as they arewere intended to be settled only in cash.
The 2015 notes matured and were extinguished on September 15, 2015. Total consideration paid to holders of the 2015 notes at maturity was $48.2 million in cash, which included $22.4 million principal amount and $25.8 million conversion premium. See Note 5 for a discussion of the settlement of the 2015 notes embedded derivative liability.
In 2014, we extinguished $69.6 million principal amount of our 2015 notes and $36.2 million principal amount of our 2029 notes pursuant to private exchange offers with holders of our outstanding convertible debt instruments. Total consideration paid to holders of the 2015 notes consisted of $82.9 million in cash and $48.2 million in shares of our common stock (2,115,055 shares). Total consideration paid to holders of the 2029 notes consisted of $66.7 million in cash and $23.2 million in shares of our common stock (946,793 shares). Total consideration paid to the holders of the 2015 notes and 2029 notes excludes the accrued interest through the settlement date that was also paid. The carrying value of the convertible notes at extinguishment was $66.0 million and $34.6 million for the 2015 notes and the 2029 notes, respectively, and losses net of tax of $4.8 million for the 2015 notes and $2.5 million for the 2029 notes were recognized.

F-36

Table of Contents
AMERICAN EQUITY INVESTMENT LIFE HOLDING COMPANY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)


Also in 2014, we issued a notice of mandatory redemption of all of the 2029 notes that were outstanding at the time the notice was issued and amended the terms of the indenture governing the 2029 notes to provide the holders with the option of receiving the conversion value of their notes entirely in cash rather than cash for the principal amount and net shares for the portion of the conversion value that exceeds the principal amount. As a result of this mandatory redemption and the change in terms, $32.1 million principal amount of the 2029 notes was converted into $69.4 million in cash and $24.6 million in shares of our common stock (897,548 shares). The amendment to the conversion terms resulted in a reclassification of the fair value of the conversion premium for the 2029 notes from equity to an embedded conversion derivative liability. The fair value of the conversion premium on the date of reclassification was $58.1 million. We applied fair value accounting to the embedded derivative liability from the date of reclassification to the dates of settlement of the conversions of the 2029 notes and recognized as expense the $3.8 million increase in the fair value of the embedded conversion derivative liability.
In 2013, we extinguished $108.0 million principal amount of our 2015 notes and $47.5 million principal amount of our 2029 notes pursuant to public and private exchange offers with holders of our outstanding convertibleThe debt instruments. Total consideration paid to holders of the 2015 notes consisted of $116.1 million in cash and $79.2 million in shares of our common stock (3,643,402 shares). Total consideration paid to holders of the 2029 notes consisted of $74.8 million in cash and $34.9 million in shares of our common stock (1,629,677 shares). Total consideration paid to the holders of the 2015 notes and 2029 notes excludes the accrued interest through the settlement date that was also paid. The carrying value of the convertible notes at extinguishment was $99.6 million and $44.5 million for the 2015 notes and 2029 notes, respectively, and losses net of tax of $15.2 million for the 2015 notes and $5.2 million for the 2029 notesdiscounts were recognized.
The convertible senior notes included in notes payable are accounted for separately as a liability component and an equity component in the consolidated balance sheets. The liability component and equity component are as follows:
 December 31, 2014 December 31, 2013
 
September
2015 Notes
 
September
2015 Notes
 
December
2029 Notes
 (Dollars in thousands)
Notes payable:     
Principal amount of liability component$22,377
 $91,951
 $68,373
Unamortized discount(698) (6,623) (3,743)
Net carrying amount of liability component$21,679
 $85,328
 $64,630
Additional paid-in capital:     
Carrying amount of equity component    $15,586
Amount by which the if-converted value exceeds principal$30,497
 $104,403
 $113,169
The discount is being amortized over the expected lives of the notes, which was December 15, 2014 for the 2029 notes and is September 15, 2015 for the 2015 notes. The effective interest rates during the discount amortization periods arewere 8.9% and 11.9% on the 2015 notes and 2029 notes, respectively. The interest cost recognized in operations for the convertible notes, inclusive of the coupon and amortization of the discount and debt issue costs was $9.0 million, $26.4$1.4 million, and $28.5$9.0 million for the years ended December 31, 2015 and 2014, 2013 and 2012, respectively.

F-40

Table of Contents
AMERICAN EQUITY INVESTMENT LIFE HOLDING COMPANY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)


We haveOn September 30, 2016, we entered into a $140credit agreement with six banks that provided for a $150 million unsecured revolving line of credit agreement with five banks(the "Revolving Facility") that terminates on November 22, 2017.September 30, 2021 and a $100 million term loan (the "Term Loan") that terminates on September 30, 2019 and can be prepaid prior to maturity without penalty. We utilized the proceeds from the Term Loan to make a contribution to the capital and surplus of our subsidiary, American Equity Life. Any proceeds from the Revolving Facility will be used to finance our general corporate purposes. Interest is paid quarterly on the Term Loan. The interest rate for all borrowings under the credit agreement is floating at a rate based on our election that will be equal to the alternate base rate (as defined in the credit agreement) plus the applicable margin or the adjusted LIBOR rate (as defined in the credit agreement) plus the applicable margin. We also pay a commitment fee based on the available unused portion of the credit facility.Revolving Facility. The applicable margin and commitment fee rate are based on our credit rating and can change throughout the period of the credit facility.borrowings. Based upon our current credit rating, the applicable margin is 1.00%0.75% for alternate base rate borrowings and 2.00%1.75% for adjusted LIBOR rate borrowings, and the commitment fee is 0.35%0.275%. The interest rate in effect on the Term Loan in 2016 was 2.625%. Under this agreement, we are required to maintain a minimum risk-based capital ratio at our subsidiary, American Equity Life, of 275%, a maximum ratio of adjusted debt to total adjusted capital of 0.35, and a minimum level of statutory surplus at American Equity Life equal to the sum of 1) 80% of statutory surplus at SeptemberJune 30, 2013,2016, 2) 50% of the statutory net income for each fiscal quarter ending after SeptemberJune 30, 2013,2016, and 3) 50% of all capital contributed to American Equity Life after SeptemberJune 30, 2013.2016. The agreementRevolving Facility contains an accordion feature that allows us, on up to three occasions and subject to credit availability, to increase the credit facility by an additional $50 million in the aggregate. We also have the ability to extend the maturity date of the Revolving Facility by an additional one year past the initial maturity date of November 22, 2017September 30, 2021 with the consent of the extending banks. There are currently no guarantors of the credit facility,Revolving Facility or the Term Loan, but certain of our subsidiaries must guarantee our obligations under the credit agreement if such subsidiaries guarantee other material amounts of our debt.  No amounts were outstanding under the Revolving Facility at December 31, 2014 and 2013.2016. As of December 31, 2014, $518.22016, $575.6 million is unrestricted and could be distributed to shareholders and still be in compliance with all covenants under this credit agreement.
The preceding replaced a $140 million unsecured revolving line of credit agreement with five banks dated November 22, 2013 that was scheduled to terminate on November 22, 2017.
As part of our investment strategy, we enter into securities repurchase agreements (short-term collateralized borrowings). The maximum amount borrowed during 2016, 2015 and 2014 and 2013 was $138.7$113.0 million, $40.6 million and $258.6$138.7 million, respectively. When we do borrow cash on these repurchase agreements, we pledge collateral in the form of debt securities with fair values approximately equal to the amount due and we use the cash to purchase debt securities ahead of the time we collect the cash from selling annuity policies to avoid a lag between the investment of funds and the obligation to credit interest to policyholders. We earn investment income on the securities purchased with these borrowings at a rate in excess of the cost of these borrowings. Such borrowings averaged $9.2$4.5 million, $0.5 million and $68.3$9.2 million for the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014, and 2013. We had no borrowings under repurchase agreements during 2012.respectively. The weighted average interest rate on amounts due under repurchase agreements was 0.19%0.66%, 0.39% and 0.20%0.19% for the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014, and 2013.respectively.
10.   Subordinated Debentures
Our wholly-owned subsidiary trusts (which are not consolidated) have issued fixed rate and floating rate trust preferred securities and have used the proceeds from these offerings to purchase subordinated debentures from us. We also issued subordinated debentures to the trusts in exchange for all of the common securities of each trust. The sole assets of the trusts are the subordinated debentures and any interest accrued thereon. The interest payment dates on the subordinated debentures correspond to the distribution dates on the trust preferred securities issued by the trusts. The trust preferred securities mature simultaneously with the subordinated debentures. Our obligations under the subordinated debentures and related agreements provide a full and unconditional guarantee of payments due under the trust preferred securities. All subordinated debentures are callable by us at any time, except for the Trust II subordinated debt obligations.

F-37

Table of Contents
AMERICAN EQUITY INVESTMENT LIFE HOLDING COMPANY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)


Following is a summary of subordinated debt obligations to the trusts at December 31, 20142016 and 2013:2015:
December 31, December 31, 
2014 2013 Interest Rate Due Date2016 2015 Interest Rate Due Date
(Dollars in thousands) (Dollars in thousands) 
American Equity Capital Trust II$76,633
 $76,440
 5% June 1, 2047$77,061
 $76,840
 5% June 1, 2047
American Equity Capital Trust III27,840
 27,840
 *LIBOR +3.90% April 29, 203427,840
 27,840
 *LIBOR +3.90% April 29, 2034
American Equity Capital Trust IV12,372
 12,372
 *LIBOR +4.00% January 8, 203412,372
 12,372
 *LIBOR +4.00% January 8, 2034
American Equity Capital Trust VII10,830
 10,830
 *LIBOR +3.75% December 14, 203410,830
 10,830
 *LIBOR +3.75% December 14, 2034
American Equity Capital Trust VIII20,620
 20,620
 *LIBOR +3.75% December 15, 203420,620
 20,620
 *LIBOR +3.75% December 15, 2034
American Equity Capital Trust IX15,470
 15,470
 *LIBOR +3.65% June 15, 203515,470
 15,470
 *LIBOR +3.65% June 15, 2035
American Equity Capital Trust X20,620
 20,620
 *LIBOR +3.65% September 15, 203520,620
 20,620
 *LIBOR +3.65% September 15, 2035
American Equity Capital Trust XI20,620
 20,620
 *LIBOR +3.65% December 15, 203520,620
 20,620
 *LIBOR +3.65% December 15, 2035
American Equity Capital Trust XII41,238
 41,238
 *LIBOR +3.50% April 7, 203641,238
 41,238
 *LIBOR +3.50% April 7, 2036
$246,243
 $246,050
 246,671
 246,450
 
Unamortized debt issue costs(4,818) (4,998) 
$241,853
 $241,452
 
*—three month London Interbank Offered Rate
The principal amount of the subordinated debentures issued by us to American Equity Capital Trust II ("Trust II") is $100.0 million. These debentures were assigned a fair value of $74.7 million at the date of issue (based upon an effective yield-to-maturity of 6.8%). The difference between the fair value at the date of issue and the principal amount is being accreted over the life of the debentures. The trust preferred securities issued by Trust II were issued to Iowa Farm Bureau Federation, which owns more than 50% of the voting capital stock of FBL Financial Group, Inc. ("FBL"). The consideration received by Trust II in connection with the issuance of its trust preferred securities consisted of fixed income securities of equal value which were issued by FBL.

F-41

Table of Contents
AMERICAN EQUITY INVESTMENT LIFE HOLDING COMPANY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)


11.   Retirement and Share-based Compensation Plans
We have adopted a contributory defined contribution plan which is qualified under Section 401(k) of the Internal Revenue Code. The plan covers substantially all of our full-time employees subject to minimum eligibility requirements. Employees can contribute a percentage of their annual salary (up to a maximum contribution of $18,000 in 2016, $18,000 in 2015 and $17,500 in 2014, $17,500 in 2013 and $17,000 in 2012)2014) to the plan. We contribute an additional amount, subject to limitations, based on the voluntary contribution of the employee. Further, the plan provides for additional employer contributions based on the discretion of the Board of Directors. Plan contributions charged to expense were $423,000, $391,000$1.3 million, $0.4 million and $370,000$0.4 million for the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014, respectively.
The following table summarizes compensation expense recognized for employees, directors and consultants as a result of share-based compensation:
 Year Ended December 31,
 2016 2015 2014
 (Dollars in thousands)
ESOP$2,522
 $2,604
 $2,486
Employee Incentive Plans1,207
 1,911
 1,306
Director Equity and Incentive Plan and Stock Option Plan685
 613
 789
 $4,414
 $5,128
 $4,581
The principal purpose of the American Equity Investment Employee Stock Ownership Plan ("ESOP") is to provide each eligible employee with an equity interest in us. Employees become eligible once they have completed a minimum of six months of service. Employees become 100% vested after two years of service. Our contribution to the ESOP is determined by the Board of Directors.
In 2016, we adopted the 2016 Employee Incentive Plan which authorized the issuance of up to 2,500,000 shares of our Common stock in the form of grants of options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock awards and restricted stock units. At December 31, 2016, we had 2,226,256 shares of common stock available for future grant under the 2016 Employee Incentive Plan. The 2009 Employee Incentive Plan, which expired in June of 2014, authorized the issuance of up to 2,500,000 shares of our common stock in the form of grants of options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock awards and restricted stock units. All options granted under this plan had six or ten year terms and a three year vesting period after which they become fully exercisable immediately.

F-38

Table of Contents
AMERICAN EQUITY INVESTMENT LIFE HOLDING COMPANY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)


We have a long-term performance incentive plan under which certain members of our senior management team are granted restricted stock units pursuant to the 2016 Employee Incentive Plan or the 2009 Employee Incentive Plan. During 2016, 2015 and 2014, we granted 208,565, 60,947 and 54,718 restricted stock units under these plans, respectively. Vesting is tied to threshold and target performance goals for the three year period ending December 31, 2018, December 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively. Fifty percent of the restricted stock units will vest if we meet threshold goals and 100% of the restricted stock units will vest if we meet target performance goals. Compensation expense is recognized over the three year vesting period based on the likelihood of meeting threshold and target goals. Restricted stock units that ultimately vest are payable in an equal number of shares of our common stock. Restricted stock units are accounted for as equity awards and the estimated fair value of restricted stock units is based upon the closing price of our common stock on the date of grant. During 2016, the 2015 restricted stock unit award agreements were amended and the restricted stock units granted during 2015 will be settled in cash if earned. This amendment was due to an administrative issue related to the grant, which was made under an expired equity plan.
During 2016, 2015 and 2014, we issued 43,373, 25,784 and 18,239 (43,373, 23,062 and 14,869 shares were restricted stock), respectively, shares of common stock under the 2016 Employee Incentive Plan or the 2009 Employee Incentive Plan to certain employees. These shares will vest on the date three years following the grant date provided the participant remains employed with us. Compensation expense is recognized over the three year vesting period. Shares vest immediately for participants over 65 years of age with 10 years of service with us, and compensation expense under this plan for these participants was recognized upon approval of the incentive award by the compensation committee. During 2016, the shares of restricted stock granted during 2015 were canceled due to an administrative issue related to the grant, which was made under an expired equity plan. During 2016, we issued 21,806 shares of common stock to the employees impacted by the cancellation taking into consideration the canceled 2015 grants.
The 2013 Director Equity and Incentive Plan authorizes the grant of options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock awards and restricted stock units convertible into or based upon our common stock of up to 250,000 shares to our Directors. During 2016, 2015 and 2014, we issued 47,500, 22,000 and 24,000 shares of common stock, respectively, all of which are restricted stock, and which vest one year from the grant date provided the individual remains a Director during that time period. At 2016, we had 116,500 shares of common stock available for future grant under the 2013 Director and Equity Incentive Plan.
Our 1996 Stock Option Plan, 2000 Employee Stock Option Plan, 2000 Directors Stock Option Plan and 2011 Director Stock Option Plan authorized grants of options to officers, directors and employees for an aggregate of up to 3,475,000 shares of our common stock. All options granted under these plans have ten year terms and a six month or three year vesting period after which they become fully exercisable immediately. At December 31, 2016, we had 18,000 shares of common stock available for future grant under the 2011 Director Stock Option Plan.
During 2014, we established the 2014 Independent Insurance Agent Restricted Stock and Restricted Stock Unit Plan, which was amended during 2016. Under the amended plan, agents of American Equity Life may receive grants of restricted stock and restricted stock units based upon their individual sales. The plan authorizes grants of up to 1,800,000 shares of our common stock. We recognize commission expense and an increase to additional paid-in capital as share-based compensation equal to the fair value of the restricted stock and restricted stock units as they are earned.
In January 2017, American Equity Life's agents were granted 363,624 restricted stock units based on their production during 2016, and we recorded commission expense (capitalized as deferred policy acquisition costs) of $2.6 million in 2016. In January 2016, American Equity Life's agents were granted 650,683 restricted stock units based on their production during 2015, and we recorded commission expense (capitalized as deferred policy acquisition costs) of $3.5 million in 2015. In January 2017, agents vested in 246,532 restricted stock units granted in January 2016 based on their continued service as an independent agent and their 2016 individual sales of our products, and for which we recorded commission expense (capitalized as deferred policy acquisition costs) of $1.7 million in 2016. 20% of the restricted stock units will vest one year from the grant date if the agent is in good standing with American Equity Life at that date. The remaining 80% of the restricted stock units granted to retirement eligible individuals will vest over a four year period if the agent remains in good standing with American Equity Life. The remaining 80% of the restricted stock units granted to non-retirement eligible individuals will vest based on the agent's individual sales and continued service as an independent agent over a period of time not to exceed five years.
In January 2015, American Equity Life's agents were granted 27,985 shares of restricted stock and 221,489 restricted stock units based on their production during 2014, and we recorded commission expense (capitalized as deferred policy acquisition costs) of $1.9 million in 2014. In January 2016, agents vested in 85,104 restricted stock units granted in January of 2015 based on their continued service as an independent agent and their 2015 individual sales of our products, and for which we recorded commission expense (capitalized as deferred policy acquisition costs) of $1.3 million in 2015. In January 2017, agents vested in 36,609 restricted stock units granted in January 2015 based on their continued service as an independent agent and their 2016 individual sales of our products, and for which we recorded commission expense (capitalized as deferred policy acquisition costs) of $0.6 million in 2016. The restricted stock was granted to retirement eligible individuals and vested immediately upon grant. 20% of the restricted stock units vested one year from the grant date if the agent was in good standing with American Equity Life at that date. The remaining 80% of the restricted stock units granted will vest based on the agent's individual sales and continued service as an independent agent over a period of time not to exceed five years.
During 2007, 2010 and 2012 we established Independent Insurance Agent Stock Option plans. Under these plans, agents of American Equity Life received grants of options to acquire shares of our common stock based upon their individual sales. The plans authorize grants of options to agents for an aggregate of up to 8,000,000 shares of our common stock. We recognize commission expense and an increase to additional paid-in capital as share-based compensation equal to the fair value of the options as they are earned.

F-39

Table of Contents
AMERICAN EQUITY INVESTMENT LIFE HOLDING COMPANY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)


Changes in the number of stock options outstanding during the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014 are as follows:
 
Number of
Shares
 
Weighted-Average
Exercise Price
per Share
 
Total
Exercise
Price
 (Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
Outstanding at January 1, 20143,976,725
 $10.86
 $43,171
Granted1,277,650
 24.79
 31,673
Canceled(35,400) 11.64
 (412)
Exercised(1,174,800) 11.64
 (13,672)
Outstanding at December 31, 20144,044,175
 15.02
 60,760
Granted
 
 
Canceled(47,300) 10.54
 (499)
Exercised(552,884) 14.51
 (8,021)
Outstanding at December 31, 20153,443,991
 15.17
 52,240
Granted
 
 
Canceled(24,700) 14.83
 (366)
Exercised(500,345) 9.97
 (4,989)
Outstanding at December 31, 20162,918,946
 16.06
 $46,885
The following table summarizes information about stock options outstanding at December 31, 2016:
  Stock Options Outstanding Stock Options Vested
Range of Exercise Prices 
Number of
Awards
 
Remaining
Life (yrs)
 
Weighted-Average
Exercise Price
Per Share
 
Number of
Awards
 
Remaining
Life (yrs)
 
Weighted-Average
Exercise Price
Per Share
$5.07 - $8.02 248,225
 1.74 $7.16
 248,225
 1.74 $7.16
$9.27 - $11.35 752,150
 2.66 10.19
 752,150
 2.66 10.19
$12.04 - $24.79 1,918,571
 3.24 19.52
 1,918,571
 3.24 19.52
$5.07 - $24.79 2,918,946
 2.97 16.06
 2,918,946
 2.97 16.06
The aggregate intrinsic value for stock options outstanding and vested awards was $21.3 million and $21.3 million, respectively, at December 31, 2016. For the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014, the total intrinsic value of options exercised by officers, directors and employees was $4.0 million, $1.4 million and $5.4 million, respectively. Intrinsic value for stock options is calculated as the difference between the exercise price of the underlying awards and the price of our common stock as of the reporting date. Cash received from stock options exercised for the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014 was $5.0 million, $8.1 million and $13.7 million, respectively. The tax benefit realized for the tax deduction from the exercise of stock options by officers, directors, employees and agents for the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014, was $0.0 million, $0.0 million and $1.0 million, respectively.
We have deferred compensation arrangements with certain officers, directors, and consultants, whereby these individuals agreed to take our common stock at a future date in lieu of cash payments at the time of service. The common stock is to be issued in conjunction with a "trigger event," as that term is defined in the individual agreements. At December 31, 20142016 and 2013,2015, these individuals have earned, and we have reserved for future issuance, 362,287364,000 and 356,897366,072 shares of common stock, respectively, pursuant to these arrangements. No deferred compensation arrangements were in effect during 2016. We have incurred expense of $127,000, $162,000$102,000 and $200,000$127,000 for the years ended December 31, 2014, 20132015 and 2012,2014, respectively, under these arrangements.
We have deferred compensation agreements with certain officers whereby these individuals may defer certain salary and bonus compensation which is deposited into the American Equity Officer Rabbi Trust (Officer Rabbi Trust). The amounts deferred for certain employees are invested in assets at the direction of the employee. The assets of the Officer Rabbi Trust are included in our assets and a corresponding deferred compensation liability is recorded. The deferred compensation liability is recorded at the fair market value of the assets in the Officer Rabbi Trust with the change in fair value included as a component of compensation expense. The deferred compensation liability related to these agreements was $3.9$3.5 million and $3.1$3.7 million at December 31, 20142016 and 2013,2015, respectively. The Officer Rabbi Trust held 102,551102,932 shares and 103,551103,251 shares of our common stock at December 31, 20142016 and 2013,2015, respectively, which are treated as treasury shares.

F-40

Table of Contents
AMERICAN EQUITY INVESTMENT LIFE HOLDING COMPANY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)


During 1997, we established the American Equity Investment NMO Deferred Compensation Plan ("NMO Deferred Compensation Plan") whereby agents cancould earn common stock in addition to their normal commissions. The NMO Deferred Compensation Plan was effective until December 31, 2006 at which time it was suspended. Awards were calculated using formulas determined annually by our Board of Directors. These shares are being distributed at the end of the vesting and deferral period of nine years. We recognize commission expense and an increase to additional paid-in capital as share-based compensation when the awards vest. All outstanding shares issued under this plan were fully vested at December 31, 2010. At December 31, 20142016 and 2013,2015, the total number of undistributed vested shares under the NMO Deferred Compensation Plan was 543,1200 and 892,688,223,454, respectively. These shares are included in the computation of earnings per share and earnings per share—assuming dilution.
We have a Rabbi Trust, the NMO Deferred Compensation Trust (the "NMO Trust"), which has purchased shares of our common stock to fund the amount of vested shares under the NMO Deferred Compensation Plan. The common stock held in the NMO Trust is treated as treasury stock. The NMO Trust distributed 349,568, 249,644215,273, 313,108 and 489,216349,568 shares during 2014, 20132016, 2015 and 2012,2014, respectively. The number of shares held by the NMO Trust at December 31, 2014 and 2013, was 543,120 and 892,688, respectively.
The following table summarizes compensation expense recognized for employees, directors and consultants as a result of share-based compensation:
 Year Ended December 31,
 2014 2013 2012
 (Dollars in thousands)
ESOP$2,486
 $3,464
 $1,112
2009 Employee Incentive Plan1,306
 1,294
 1,558
2013 Director Equity and Incentive Plan603
 380
 
2011 Director Stock Option Plan186
 304
 912
 $4,581
 $5,442
 $3,582
We established the American Equity Investment Employee Stock Ownership Plan ("ESOP") effective July 1, 2007. The principal purpose of the ESOP is to provide each eligible employee with an equity interest in us. Employees become eligible once they have completed a minimum of six months of service. Employees become 100% vested after two years of service. Our contribution to the ESOP is determined by the Board of Directors.
In August 2007, we issued a loan to the ESOP in the amount of $7.0 million to purchase 650,000 shares of our common stock from David J. Noble, our Executive Chairman. The loan was to be repaid over a period of 20 years with annual interest payments due on December 31 of each year. However, this loan was repaid in full as of December 31, 2014. The loan is eliminated in the consolidated financial statements. The shares purchased by the ESOP were pledged as collateral for this debt and were reported as unallocated common stock held by the ESOP, a contra-equity account in stockholders' equity. When shares were committed for release, the shares become outstanding for earnings per share computations. For each plan year in which a payment or prepayment of principal or interest was made, we released from the pledge the number of shares determined under the principal and interest method. Dividends on allocated ESOP shares were recorded as a reduction in retained earnings and were credited to employee accounts. Dividends on unallocated shares held by the ESOP were used to repay indebtedness.

F-42

Table of Contents
AMERICAN EQUITY INVESTMENT LIFE HOLDING COMPANY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)


During 2010, we established the American Equity Investment Life Holding Company Short-Term Performance Incentive Plan. Under this plan, certain members of our senior management may receive incentive awards comprised of a cash component and a restricted stock component. In April 2013, the Short-Term Performance Incentive Plan was amended and restated to provide for only cash bonuses for awards made with respect to 2013 and following years. Shares of restricted stock received were granted pursuant to the 2009 Employee Incentive Plan and vest on the date three years following the date the Committee approved the payment of the incentive award provided that the participant remains employed by us. Compensation expense is recognized over the three year vesting period. Shares vested immediately for participants 65 years of age with 10 years of service with us, and compensation expense under this plan for these participants was recognized upon approval of the incentive award by the compensation committee. During 2013 and 2012, we issued 33,489 and 51,810 shares of common stock (23,681 and 37,369 shares were restricted stock), respectively.
During 2013, we established a long-term performance incentive plan utilizing restricted stock units granted pursuant to the 2009 Employee Incentive Plan. During 2014 and 2013, we granted 54,718 and 78,260 restricted stock units under this plan, respectively. Vesting is tied to threshold and target performance goals for the three year period ending December 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively. Fifty percent of the restricted stock units will vest if we meet threshold goalswas 15,058 and 100% of the restricted stock units will vest if we meet target performance goals. Compensation expense is recognized over the three year vesting period based on the likelihood of meeting threshold and target goals. Restricted stock units that ultimately vest are payable in an equal number of shares of our common stock. Restricted stock units are accounted for as equity awards and the estimated fair value of restricted stock units is based upon the closing price of our common stock on the date of grant.230,012, respectively.
During 2014 and 2013, we issued 18,239 and 26,087 (14,869 and 20,889 shares were restricted stock), respectively, shares of common stock under the 2009 Employee Incentive Plan to certain employees. These shares will vest on the date three years following the grant date provided the participant remains employed with us. Compensation expense is recognized over the three year vesting period. Shares vest immediately for participants over 65 years of age with 10 years of service with us.
In 2013, we adopted the 2013 Director Equity and Incentive Plan which authorized the grant of options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock awards and restricted stock units convertible into or based upon our common stock of up to 250,000 shares to our Directors. During 2014 and 2013, we issued 24,000 and 40,000 shares of common stock, respectively, all of which are restricted stock, and which vest one year from the grant date provided the individual remains a Director during that time period. At December 31, 2014, we had 186,000 shares of common stock available for future grant under the 2013 Director and Equity Incentive Plan.
Our 1996 Stock Option Plan, 2000 Employee Stock Option Plan, 2000 Directors Stock Option Plan and 2011 Director Stock Option Plan authorized grants of options to officers, directors and employees for an aggregate of up to 3,475,000 shares of our common stock. All options granted under these plans have ten year terms and a six month or three year vesting period after which they become fully exercisable immediately. At December 31, 2014, we had 18,000 shares of common stock available for future grant under the 2011 Director Stock Option Plan. In 2009, we adopted the 2009 Employee Incentive Plan which authorizes the grant of options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock awards and restricted stock units convertible into or based upon our common stock up to 2,500,000 shares. All options granted under this plan have six or ten year terms and a three year vesting period after which they become fully exercisable immediately. At December 31, 2014, we had 1,623,928 shares of common stock available for future grant under the 2009 Employee Incentive Plan.
The fair value for each stock option granted to officers, directors and employees during the year ended December 31, 2012 was estimated at the date of grant using a Black-Scholes option valuation model with the following assumptions:
 Year Ended December 31,
 2012
 Directors and Retirement Eligible Employees Non-Retirement Eligible Employees
Average risk-free interest rate0.76% 1.36%
Dividend yield1.1% 1.3%
Average expected life (years)5
 8
Volatility62.5% 50.9%
The risk-free interest rate is based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at the time of grant. We use the historical realized volatility of our stock for the expected volatility assumption within the valuation model. For options granted since 2007, the weighted average expected term for the majority of our options were calculated using average historical behavior.
During 2014 we established the 2014 Independent Insurance Agent Restricted Stock and Restricted Stock Unit Plan. Under this plan, agents of American Equity Life may receive grants of restricted stock and restricted stock units based upon their individual sales. The plan authorizes grants of up to 1,000,000 shares of our common stock. We recognize commission expense and an increase to additional paid-in capital as share-based compensation equal to the fair value of the restricted stock and restricted stock units as they are earned.

F-43

Table of Contents
AMERICAN EQUITY INVESTMENT LIFE HOLDING COMPANY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)


In January 2015, American Equity Life's agents were granted 27,985 shares of restricted stock and 221,489 restricted stock units based on their production during 2014, and we recorded commission expense (capitalized as deferred policy acquisition costs) of $1.9 million in 2014. The restricted stock was granted to retirement eligible individuals and vested immediately upon grant. 20% of the restricted stock units will vest one year from the grant date if the agent is in good standing with American Equity Life at that date.The remaining 80% of the restricted stock units granted will vest based on the agent's individual sales and continued service as an independent agent to American Equity Life over a period of time not to exceed five years.
During 2007, 2010 and 2012 we established Independent Insurance Agent Stock Option plans. Under these plans, agents of American Equity Life may receive grants of options to acquire shares of our common stock based upon their individual sales. The plans authorize grants of options to agents for an aggregate of up to 8,000,000 shares of our common stock. We recognize commission expense and an increase to additional paid-in capital as share-based compensation equal to the fair value of the options as they are earned.
The fair value for each stock option granted to agents during the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012 was estimated using a Black-Scholes option valuation model until the grant date, at which time the options are included as permanent equity, with the following assumptions:
 Year Ended December 31,
 2013 2012
Average risk-free interest rate1.21% 0.51%
Dividend yield0.7% 1.2%
Average expected life (years)3.75
 3.75
Volatility31.2% 41.1%
American Equity Life's agents earned 1,284,950 options during 2013, which were granted in January 2014, and we recorded commission expense (capitalized as deferred policy acquisition costs) of $8.1 million in 2013. American Equity Life's agents earned 1,125,100 options during 2012, which were granted in January 2013, and we recorded commission expense (capitalized as deferred policy acquisition costs) of $3.9 million in 2012. All options granted have seven year terms and a six month vesting period after which they become exercisable immediately.
Changes in the number of stock options outstanding during the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012 are as follows:
 
Number of
Shares
 
Weighted-Average
Exercise Price
per Share
 
Total
Exercise
Price
 (Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
Outstanding at January 1, 20124,844,850
 $10.13
 $49,097
Granted1,558,900
 10.40
 16,216
Canceled(28,050) 8.97
 (251)
Exercised(643,250) 8.93
 (5,741)
Outstanding at December 31, 20125,732,450
 10.35
 59,321
Granted1,210,950
 13.13
 15,899
Canceled(29,400) 9.96
 (293)
Exercised(2,937,275) 10.81
 (31,756)
Outstanding at December 31, 20133,976,725
 10.86
 43,171
Granted1,277,650
 24.79
 31,673
Canceled(35,400) 11.64
 (412)
Exercised(1,174,800) 11.64
 (13,672)
Outstanding at December 31, 20144,044,175
 15.02
 $60,760
The following table summarizes information about stock options outstanding at December 31, 2014:
  Stock Options Outstanding Stock Options Vested
Range of Exercise Prices 
Number of
Awards
 
Remaining
Life (yrs)
 
Weighted-Average
Exercise Price
Per Share
 
Number of
Awards
 
Remaining
Life (yrs)
 
Weighted-Average
Exercise Price
Per Share
$5.07 - $8.02 506,000
 2.73 $7.39
 506,000
 2.73 $7.39
$9.27 - $11.35 1,220,550
 3.94 10.23
 1,136,550
 3.69 10.21
$11.87 - $24.79 2,317,625
 5.23 19.22
 2,297,625
 5.18 19.22
$5.07 - $24.79 4,044,175
 4.53 15.02
 3,940,175
 4.43 15.10

F-44

Table of Contents
AMERICAN EQUITY INVESTMENT LIFE HOLDING COMPANY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)


The aggregate intrinsic value for stock options outstanding and vested awards was $57.3 million and $50.0 million, respectively, at December 31, 2014. For the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012, the total intrinsic value of options exercised by officers, directors and employees was $5.4 million, $10.4 million and $0.9 million, respectively. Intrinsic value for stock options is calculated as the difference between the exercise price of the underlying awards and the price of our common stock as of the reporting date. Cash received from stock options exercised for the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012 was $13.7 million, $31.8 million and $5.7 million, respectively. The tax benefit realized for the tax deduction from the exercise of stock options by officers, directors, employees and agents for the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012, was $1.0 million, $1.0 million and $0.1 million, respectively.
12.   Statutory Financial Information and Dividend Restrictions
Statutory accounting practices prescribed or permitted by regulatory authorities for our life insurance subsidiaries differ from GAAP. Net income for our primary life insurance subsidiary as determined in accordance with statutory accounting practices was as follows:
 Year Ended December 31,
 2014 2013 2012
 (Dollars in thousands)
American Equity Life$340,000
 $205,202
 $82,039
 Year Ended December 31,
 2016 2015 2014
 (Dollars in thousands)
American Equity Life$75,035
 $131,452
 $340,000
Statutory capital and surplus for our primary life insurance subsidiary was as follows:
 December 31,
 2014 2013
 (Dollars in thousands)
American Equity Life$2,172,455
 $1,870,728
 December 31,
 2016 2015
 (Dollars in thousands)
American Equity Life$2,726,664
 $2,415,419
American Equity Life is domiciled in the state of Iowa and is regulated by the Iowa Insurance Division. Life insurance companies are subject to the National Association of Insurance Commissioners ("NAIC") risk-based capital (RBC) requirements which are intended to be used by insurance regulators as an early warning tool to identify deteriorating or weakly capitalized insurance companies for the purpose of initiating regulatory action. Calculations using the NAIC formula indicated that American Equity Life's ratio of total adjusted capital to the highest level of required capital at which regulatory action might be initiated (Company Action Level) is as follows:
December 31,December 31,
2014 20132016 2015
(Dollars in thousands)(Dollars in thousands)
Total adjusted capital$2,327,335
 $1,995,658
$2,933,193
 $2,593,472
Company Action Level RBC625,373
 580,085
857,321
 771,293
Ratio of adjusted capital to Company Action Level RBC372% 344%342% 336%
Prior approval of regulatory authorities is required for the payment of dividends to the parent company by American Equity Life which exceed an annual limitation. American Equity Life may pay dividends without prior approval, unless such payments, together with all other such payments within the preceding twelve months, exceed the greater of (1) net gain from operations before net realized capital gains/losses for the preceding calendar year or, (2) 10% of the American Equity Life's capital and surplus at the preceding year-end. The amount of dividends permitted to be paid by American Equity Life to its parent company without prior approval of regulatory authorities is $343.3$272.7 million as of December 31, 2014.2016. No dividends were paid by any of our insurance subsidiaries for any of the years presented in these financial statements.
The Parent Company relies on its subsidiaries for cash flow, which has primarily been in the form of investment management fees and/or dividends. Retained earnings in our consolidated financial statements primarily represent undistributed earnings of American Equity Life. As such, our ability to pay dividends is limited by the regulatory restriction placed upon insurance companies as described above. In addition, American Equity Life retains funds to allow for sufficient capital for growth.

F-45F-41

Table of Contents
AMERICAN EQUITY INVESTMENT LIFE HOLDING COMPANY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)


13.   Commitments and Contingencies
We lease our home office space and certain equipment under various operating leases. Rent expense for the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014 2013 and 2012 totaled $2.5$2.8 million, $2.3$2.7 million and $2.02.7 million, respectively. At December 31, 2014,2016, the aggregate future minimum lease payments are $18.4$16.9 million. The following represents payments due by period for operating lease obligations as of December 31, 20142016 (dollars in thousands):
Year Ending December 31:  
2015$2,323
20161,718
20171,473
$1,890
20181,398
1,915
20191,377
1,898
2020 and thereafter10,102
20201,950
20211,754
2022 and thereafter7,464
We are occasionally involved in litigation, both as a defendant and as a plaintiff. In addition, state regulatory bodies, such as state insurance departments, the SEC, FINRA, the Department of Labor, and other regulatory bodies regularly make inquiries and conduct examinations or investigations concerning our compliance with, among other things, insurance laws, securities laws, the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended, and laws governing the activities of broker-dealers.broker/dealers.
In accordance with applicable accounting guidelines, we establish an accrued liability for litigation and regulatory matters when those matters present loss contingencies that are both probable and estimable. As a litigation or regulatory matter is developing we, in conjunction with outside counsel, evaluate on an ongoing basis whether the matter presents a loss contingency that meets conditions indicating the need for accrual and/or disclosure, and if not the matter will continue to be monitored for further developments. If and when the loss contingency related to litigation or regulatory matters is deemed to be both probable and estimable, we will establish an accrued liability with respect to that matter and will continue to monitor the matter for further developments that may affect the amount of the accrued liability.
In recent years, companiesCompanies in the life insurance and annuity business have faced litigation, including class action lawsuits, alleging improper product design, improper sales practices and similar claims. We were a defendant in a purported class action, McCormack, et al. v. American Equity Investment Life Insurance Company, et alal.., in the United States District Court for the Central District of California, Western Division and Anagnostis v. American Equity, et alal.., coordinated in the Central District, entitled, In Re: American Equity Annuity Practices and Sales Litigation (complaint filed September 7, 2005) (the "Los Angeles Case"), involving allegations of improper sales practices and similar claims.
The Los Angeles Case was a consolidated action involving several lawsuits filed by putative class members seeking class action status for a national class of purchasers of annuities issued by us. On July 30, 2013, the parties entered into a settlement agreement and stipulated to certification of the case as a class action for settlement purposes only. Notice of the terms of the settlement was mailed to the members of theA class on October 7, 2013 and settlement claim forms were due from members of the class on or before December 6, 2013. On January 27, 2014, a hearing was held regarding the fairness of the settlement. On January 29, 2014, the District Court signed a final order approving the settlement and finding the settlement is fair and represents a complete resolution of all claims asserted on behalf of the class. On January 30, 2014, a final judgment was entered dismissing the case on the merits and with prejudice. On February 28, 2014, a member of the class filed an appeal of the District Court's approval of the terms of the settlement agreement with the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.Circuit on February 28, 2014. On February 17, 2016, the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit affirmed the terms of the settlement agreement and on April 6, 2016, the class member’s subsequent request for a rehearing en banc was denied. All remaining opportunities for appeal have passed.
We recorded an estimated litigation liability of $17.5 million duringDuring the third quarter of 20122016, we reduced the litigation liability related to the Los Angeles Case. We increased our estimatedCase by $6.4 million as we paid out $1.8 million in partial settlement, reclassified $1.8 million from the litigation liability for this matter to $21.2policy benefit reserves and other policy funds and contract claims and released $2.8 million during the fourth quarter of 2013 following the passage of the deadline for submission of claims by class members in the lawsuit and based upon information available at that time. However, we decreased thelitigation liability by $2.3 million in the first quarter of 2014 as additional information became available concerning the nature and magnitude of claims based on the claims received. In addition, duringterms of the firstsettlement. During the fourth quarter of 2014,2016, we paid $7.8out an additional $4.1 million in legal fees toand reduced the plaintiffs' counsel. The estimated litigation liability at December 31, 2014 is $11.1by $4.1 million. While review of the claim forms has been stayed due to the appeal and it is difficult to predict the amount of the liabilities that will ultimately result from the completion of the claims process, the $11.1 millionAfter this activity, we estimate our litigation liability representsin this matter to be $0.6 million based on our best estimate of probable loss with respect to this litigation. In light of the inherent uncertainties involved in the matter described above, thereloss. There can be no assurance that such litigation, or any other pending or future litigation will not have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, or results of operations.
In addition to our commitments to fund mortgage loans, we have unfunded commitments at December 31, 20142016 to limited partnerships of $30.6$48.4 million and to secured bank loans of $5.7$34.3 million.

F-46F-42

Table of Contents
AMERICAN EQUITY INVESTMENT LIFE HOLDING COMPANY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)


14.   Earnings Per Share and Stockholders' Equity
Earnings Per Share
The following table sets forth the computation of earnings per common share and earnings per common share—assuming dilution:
Year Ended December 31,Year Ended December 31,
2014 2013 20122016 2015 2014
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
Numerator:          
Net income—numerator for earnings per common share$126,023
 $253,283
 $57,798
$83,243
 $219,830
 $126,023
Interest on convertible subordinated debentures (net of income tax benefit)
 
 517
Numerator for earnings per common share—assuming dilution$126,023
 $253,283
 $58,315
          
Denominator:
          
Weighted average common shares outstanding (1)74,431,087
 65,543,895
 61,258,825
84,793,151
 78,936,828
 74,431,087
Effect of dilutive securities:          
Convertible subordinated debentures
 
 1,348,447
Convertible senior notes2,657,158
 7,088,149
 2,515,067

 
 2,657,158
Equity forward sale agreements
 67,575
 
2015 warrants1,559,646
 1,184,549
 
15,136
 759,723
 1,559,646
Stock options and deferred compensation agreements1,178,783
 1,224,053
 553,312
456,236
 1,040,922
 1,178,783
Restricted stock and restricted stock units66,926
 
 
340,646
 155,520
 66,926
Denominator for earnings per common share—assuming dilution79,893,600
 75,040,646
 65,675,651
85,605,169
 80,960,568
 79,893,600
          
Earnings per common share$1.69
 $3.86
 $0.94
$0.98
 $2.78
 $1.69
Earnings per common share—assuming dilution$1.58
 $3.38
 $0.89
$0.97
 $2.72
 $1.58
(1)Weighted average common shares outstanding include shares vested under the NMO Deferred Compensation Plan and exclude unallocated shares held by the ESOP.
Options to purchase shares of our common stock that were outstanding during the respective periods indicated but were not included in the computation of diluted earnings per share because the options' exercise price was greater than the average market price of the common shares are as follows:
Period 
Number of
Shares
 
Range of
Exercise Prices
 
Number of
Shares
 
Range of
Exercise Prices
   Minimum Maximum   Minimum Maximum
Year ended December 31, 2016 1,054,091 $24.79 $24.79
Year ended December 31, 2015 1,061,541 $24.79 $24.79
Year ended December 31, 2014 1,215,450 $24.79 $24.79 1,215,450 $24.79 $24.79
Year ended December 31, 2013   
Year ended December 31, 2012 1,522,100 $11.35 $14.34
Stockholders' Equity
In August 2015, we completed an underwritten public offering of 8,600,000 shares of our common stock at a public offering price of $25.25 per share, of which 4,300,000 shares were subject to a forward sale agreement. The underwriters exercised in full their option to purchase 1,290,000 additional shares of common stock, which were subject to a separate forward sale agreement. We settled the forward sale agreements on August 1, 2016 and issued 5,590,000 shares of our common stock and received $134.7 million in net proceeds. We contributed the net proceeds from the settlement to the capital and surplus of American Equity Life.
The forward sale agreements had no initial fair value since they were entered into at the then market price of the common stock. The forward sale agreements were equity instruments and qualified for an exception from derivative and fair value accounting.


F-47F-43

Table of Contents
AMERICAN EQUITY INVESTMENT LIFE HOLDING COMPANY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)


15.   Quarterly Financial Information (Unaudited)
Unaudited quarterly results of operations are summarized below.
Quarter EndedQuarter Ended
March 31, June 30, September 30, December 31,March 31, June 30, September 30, December 31,
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
2014       
2016       
Premiums and product charges$32,603
 $38,370
 $38,001
 $42,639
$43,850
 $52,582
 $60,406
 $60,508
Net investment income370,005
 370,882
 386,931
 403,849
450,826
 459,830
 463,583
 475,633
Change in fair value of derivatives48,493
 270,883
 39,218
 146,231
(74,065) 39,099
 103,794
 95,391
Net realized gains (losses) on investments, excluding OTTI losses(714) (2,230) (3,190) 2,131
2,687
 2,737
 5,256
 844
Net OTTI losses recognized in operations(905) (594) (564) (564)(5,694) (4,446) (2,979) (9,560)
Loss on extinguishment of debt(3,977) (6,574) 
 (1,951)
Total revenues445,505
 670,737
 460,396
 592,335
417,604
 549,802
 630,060
 622,816
Net income (loss)(9,753) 36,744
 67,815
 31,217
(44,841) 14,708
 (7,420) 120,796
Earnings (loss) per common share(0.13) 0.49
 0.90
 0.41
(0.55) 0.18
 (0.09) 1.37
Earnings (loss) per common share—assuming dilution(0.13) 0.46
 0.85
 0.39
(0.55) 0.18
 (0.09) 1.35
              
2013       
2015       
Premiums and product charges$34,565
 $35,062
 $36,325
 $42,986
$35,679
 $42,446
 $46,310
 $47,781
Net investment income329,690
 336,143
 354,147
 363,947
399,669
 418,176
 436,085
 438,262
Change in fair value of derivatives373,962
 64,040
 193,028
 444,985
(31,100) (23,024) (351,360) 69,338
Net realized gains (losses) on investments, excluding OTTI losses10,585
 15,689
 (2,077) 16,364
4,879
 4,324
 1,159
 (151)
Net OTTI losses recognized in operations(3,237) (2,775) (222) 
(132) (828) (5,229) (13,347)
Loss on extinguishment of debt
 (589) (938) (30,988)
Total revenues745,565
 447,570
 580,263
 837,294
408,995
 441,094
 126,965
 541,883
Net income26,031
 120,113
 56,181
 50,958
5,903
 82,845
 97,306
 33,776
Earnings per common share0.41
 1.87
 0.86
 0.73
0.08
 1.07
 1.22
 0.41
Earnings per common share—assuming dilution0.38
 1.71
 0.75
 0.64
0.07
 1.05
 1.19
 0.40
Earnings (loss) per common share for each quarter is computed independently of earnings (loss) per common share for the year. As a result, the sum of the quarterly earnings (loss) per common share amounts may not equal the earnings (loss) per common share for the year.
The differences between the change in fair value of derivatives for each quarter primarily correspond to the performance of the indices upon which our call options are based. The comparability of net income (loss) is impacted by the application of fair value accounting to our fixed index annuity business is as follows:
 Quarter Ended
 March 31, June 30, September 30, December 31,
 (Dollars in thousands)
2014$42,297
 $(2,232) $(5,017) $15,862
201310,973
 (80,658) (5,601) (23,418)
 Quarter Ended
 March 31, June 30, September 30, December 31,
 (Dollars in thousands)
2016$62,822
 $34,215
 $6,054
 $(66,618)
201542,849
 (28,596) (53,716) 11,091


F-48


Schedule I—Summary of Investments—
Other Than Investments in Related Parties

AMERICAN EQUITY INVESTMENT LIFE HOLDING COMPANY

December 31, 20142016

Column A Column B Column C Column D Column B Column C Column D
Type of Investment 
Amortized
Cost (1)
 
Fair
Value
 
Amount at
which shown
in the balance
sheet
 
Amortized
Cost (1)
 
Fair
Value
 
Amount at
which shown
in the balance
sheet
 (Dollars in thousands) (Dollars in thousands)
Fixed maturity securities:            
Available for sale:            
United States Government full faith and credit $137,710
 $138,460
 $138,460
 $11,864
 $11,805
 $11,805
United States Government sponsored agencies 1,364,424
 1,393,890
 1,393,890
 1,368,340
 1,344,787
 1,344,787
United States municipalities, states and territories 3,293,551
 3,723,309
 3,723,309
 3,626,395
 3,926,950
 3,926,950
Foreign government obligations 181,128
 193,803
 193,803
 224,588
 232,233
 232,233
Corporate securities 19,984,747
 21,490,292
 21,490,292
 26,338,214
 27,118,526
 27,118,526
Residential mortgage backed securities 1,616,846
 1,751,345
 1,751,345
 1,166,944
 1,254,835
 1,254,835
Commercial mortgage backed securities 2,720,294
 2,807,620
 2,807,620
 5,422,255
 5,365,235
 5,365,235
Other asset backed securities 906,346
 946,483
 946,483
 1,795,355
 1,806,123
 1,806,123
 30,205,046
 32,445,202
 32,445,202
 39,953,955
 41,060,494
 41,060,494
Held for investment:   
 
   
 
Corporate security 76,432
 75,838
 76,432
 76,825
 68,766
 76,825
Total fixed maturity securities 30,281,478
 32,521,040
 32,521,634
 40,030,780
 41,129,260
 41,137,319
Equity securities, available for sale:   
 
Common stocks 7,509
 7,805
 7,805
Total equity securities 7,509
 7,805
 7,805
Mortgage loans on real estate 2,434,580
 2,493,901
 2,434,580
 2,480,956
 2,522,035
 2,480,956
Derivative instruments 259,413
 731,113
 731,113
 313,729
 830,519
 830,519
Other investments 286,726
   286,726
 308,296
   308,774
Total investments $33,269,706
   $35,981,858
 $43,133,761
   $44,757,568
(1)On the basis of cost adjusted for other than temporary impairments, repayments and amortization of premiums and accrual of discounts for fixed maturity securities and short-term investments, original cost for derivative instruments and unpaid principal balance less allowance for credit losses for mortgage loans.

See accompanying Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm.

F-49

Table of Contents

Schedule II—Condensed Financial Information of Registrant
AMERICAN EQUITY INVESTMENT LIFE HOLDING COMPANY (PARENT COMPANY)
Condensed Balance Sheets
(Dollars in thousands)




December 31,December 31,
2014 20132016 2015
Assets      
Cash and cash equivalents$61,139
 $252,541
$36,394
 $38,903
Equity securities of subsidiary trusts7,409
 7,403
7,422
 7,415
Receivable from subsidiaries221
 1,158
182
 207
Deferred income taxes20,612
 15,734
9,528
 11,645
Federal income tax recoverable, including amount from subsidiaries10,430
 11,551

 7,747
Other assets, including 2015 notes hedges47,308
 131,424
Other assets2,540
 2,270
147,119
 419,811
56,066
 68,187
Investment in and advances to subsidiaries2,708,085
 1,889,648
2,992,217
 2,526,972
Total assets$2,855,204
 $2,309,459
$3,048,283
 $2,595,159
      
Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity      
Liabilities:      
Notes payable$421,679
 $549,958
Notes and loan payable$493,755
 $393,227
Subordinated debentures payable to subsidiary trusts246,243
 246,050
241,853
 241,452
Other liabilities, including 2015 notes embedded derivative47,406
 128,764
Federal income tax payable3,614
 
Other liabilities17,466
 15,945
Total liabilities715,328
 924,772
756,688
 650,624
Stockholders' equity:      
Common stock76,062
 70,535
88,001
 81,354
Additional paid-in capital513,218
 550,400
770,344
 630,367
Unallocated common stock held by ESOP
 (631)
Accumulated other comprehensive income721,401
 46,196
339,966
 201,663
Retained earnings829,195
 718,187
1,093,284
 1,031,151
Total stockholders' equity2,139,876
 1,384,687
2,291,595
 1,944,535
Total liabilities and stockholders' equity$2,855,204
 $2,309,459
$3,048,283
 $2,595,159

See accompanying note to condensed financial statements.
See accompanying Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm.

F-50

Table of Contents

Schedule II—Condensed Financial Information of Registrant (Continued)
AMERICAN EQUITY INVESTMENT LIFE HOLDING COMPANY (PARENT COMPANY)
Condensed Statements of Operations
(Dollars in thousands)



Year Ended December 31,Year Ended December 31,
2014 2013 20122016 2015 2014
Revenues:          
Net investment income$130
 $130
 $565
$78
 $62
 $130
Dividends from subsidiary trusts360
 361
 403
384
 363
 360
Investment advisory fees58,044
 44,469
 36,178
75,706
 65,957
 58,044
Surplus note interest from subsidiary4,080
 4,080
 4,080
4,080
 4,080
 4,080
Change in fair value of derivatives(17,122) 144,012
 (7,472)(810) (8,225) (17,122)
Loss on extinguishment of debt(12,502) (32,515) 

 
 (12,502)
Total revenues32,990
 160,537
 33,754
79,438
 62,237
 32,990
Expenses:          
Change in fair value of embedded derivatives(15,227) 141,974
 (2,488)
 (4,516) (15,227)
Interest expense on notes payable36,370
 38,870
 28,479
Interest expense on notes and loan payable28,248
 28,849
 36,370
Interest expense on subordinated debentures issued to subsidiary trusts12,122
 12,088
 13,458
12,958
 12,239
 12,122
Other operating costs and expenses7,928
 8,163
 8,228
8,551
 8,195
 7,928
Total expenses41,193
 201,095
 47,677
49,757
 44,767
 41,193
Loss before income taxes and equity in undistributed income of subsidiaries(8,203) (40,558) (13,923)
Income tax expense (benefit)664
 (13,880) (5,944)
Loss before equity in undistributed income of subsidiaries(8,867) (26,678) (7,979)
Income (loss) before income taxes and equity in undistributed income of subsidiaries29,681
 17,470
 (8,203)
Income tax expense12,073
 7,338
 664
Income (loss) before equity in undistributed income of subsidiaries17,608
 10,132
 (8,867)
Equity in undistributed income of subsidiaries134,890
 279,961
 65,777
65,635
 209,698
 134,890
Net income$126,023
 $253,283
 $57,798
$83,243
 $219,830
 $126,023

See accompanying note to condensed financial statements.
See accompanying Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm.

F-51

Table of Contents

Schedule II—Condensed Financial Information of Registrant (Continued)
AMERICAN EQUITY INVESTMENT LIFE HOLDING COMPANY (PARENT COMPANY)
Condensed Statements of Cash Flows
(Dollars in thousands)


Year Ended December 31,Year Ended December 31,
2014 2013 20122016 2015 2014
Operating activities          
Net income$126,023
 $253,283
 $57,798
$83,243
 $219,830
 $126,023
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:          
Change in fair value of 2015 notes embedded conversion derivative(15,227) 141,974
 (2,488)
 (4,516) (15,227)
Provision for depreciation and amortization2,081
 2,831
 2,382
1,946
 1,613
 2,081
Accrual of discount on equity security(6) (5) (5)(7) (6) (6)
Equity in undistributed income of subsidiaries(134,890) (279,961) (65,777)(65,635) (209,698) (134,890)
Accrual of discount on contingent convertible notes4,417
 12,417
 12,261

 698
 4,417
Change in fair value of derivatives15,619
 (144,012) 7,472
(698) 6,377
 15,619
Loss on extinguishment of debt12,502
 32,515
 

 
 12,502
Accrual of discount on debenture issued to subsidiary trust193
 181
 169
221
 207
 193
Share-based compensation1,141
 1,407
 1,348
818
 1,026
 1,141
ESOP compensation82
 110
 45

 
 82
Deferred income taxes (benefits)6,439
 (5,202) (2,838)
Deferred income taxes2,117
 8,967
 6,439
Other(2,235) (3,608) 

 
 (2,235)
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:          
Receivable from subsidiaries2,208
 995
 1,205
(125) 93
 2,208
Federal income tax recoverable1,121
 62
 (2,745)11,361
 2,683
 1,121
Other assets378
 (1,945) (549)(326) (4) 378
Other liabilities(7,256) 20,131
 (4,528)2,546
 (1,664) (7,256)
Net cash provided by operating activities12,590
 31,173
 3,750
35,461
 25,606
 12,590
          
Investing activities          
Capital contributions to subsidiaries$(255,000) $(120,000) $
Purchases of property, plant and equipment(54) 
 
Net cash used in investing activities
 
 
(255,054) (120,000) 
     
Financing activities     
Financing fees incurred and deferred$(1,456) $
 $(100)
Repayments of notes payable
 (48,152) (219,094)
Net proceeds from settlement of notes hedges and warrants
 25,775
 16,558
Proceeds from issuance of debt100,000
 
 
Excess tax benefits realized from share-based compensation plans
 
 184
Proceeds from issuance of common stock139,654
 112,481
 13,681
Dividends paid(21,114) (17,946) (15,221)
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities217,084
 72,158
 (203,992)
Decrease in cash and cash equivalents(2,509) (22,236) (191,402)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year38,903
 61,139
 252,541
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year$36,394
 $38,903
 $61,139
     
Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information     
Cash paid during the year for:     
Interest on notes and loan payable$27,164
 $27,283
 $31,206
Interest on subordinated debentures12,454
 11,833
 11,765
Non-cash financing activity:     
Common stock issued in extinguishment of debt
 
 95,993
Common stock issued to settle warrants that have expired93
 48
 

See accompanying note to condensed financial statements.
F-52

TableSee accompanying Report of ContentsIndependent Registered Public Accounting Firm.

Schedule II—Condensed Financial Information of Registrant (Continued)
AMERICAN EQUITY INVESTMENT LIFE HOLDING COMPANY (PARENT COMPANY)
Condensed Statements of Cash Flows (Continued)
(Dollars in thousands)


 Year Ended December 31,
 2014 2013 2012
Financing activities     
Financing fees incurred and deferred$(100) $(11,942) $
Proceeds from notes payable
 415,000
 
Repayments of notes payable(219,094) (234,154) 
Net proceeds from settlement of notes hedge and warrants16,558
 22,170
 
Repayment of subordinated debentures
 
 (1,141)
Excess tax benefits realized from share-based compensation plans184
 159
 6
Proceeds from issuance of common stock13,681
 31,764
 5,370
Dividends paid(15,221) (12,849) (9,374)
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities(203,992) 210,148
 (5,139)
Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents(191,402) 241,321
 (1,389)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year252,541
 11,220
 12,609
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year$61,139
 $252,541
 $11,220
      
Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information     
Cash paid during the year for:     
Interest on notes payable$31,206
 $13,758
 $14,564
Interest on subordinated debentures11,765
 11,850
 13,102
Non-cash financing activity:     
Conversion of subordinated debentures
 
 20,770
Common stock issued in extinguishment of debt95,993
 117,463
 

See accompanying note to condensed financial statements.
See accompanying Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm.

F-53

Table of Contents

Schedule II—Condensed Financial Information of Registrant (Continued)
AMERICAN EQUITY INVESTMENT LIFE HOLDING COMPANY (PARENT COMPANY)
Note to Condensed Financial Statements
December 31, 20142016


1.     Basis of Presentation
The accompanying condensed financial statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto of American Equity Investment Life Holding Company (Parent Company).
In the Parent Company financial statements, its investment in and advances to subsidiaries are stated at cost plus equity in undistributed income (losses) of subsidiaries since the date of acquisition and net unrealized gains/losses on the subsidiaries' fixed maturity securities classified as "available for sale" and equity securities.
See Notes 9 and 10 to the consolidated financial statements for a description of the Parent Company's notes payable and subordinated debentures payable to subsidiary trusts.


F-54


Schedule III—Supplementary Insurance Information

AMERICAN EQUITY INVESTMENT LIFE HOLDING COMPANY

Column A Column B Column C Column D Column E Column B Column C Column D Column E
 
Deferred policy
acquisition
costs
 
Future policy
benefits,
losses, claims
and loss
expenses
 
Unearned
premiums
 
Other policy
claims and
benefits
payable
 
Deferred policy
acquisition
costs
 
Future policy
benefits,
losses, claims
and loss
expenses
 
Unearned
premiums
 
Other policy
claims and
benefits
payable
 (Dollars in thousands) (Dollars in thousands)
As of December 31, 2016:
Life insurance
 $2,905,377
 $51,637,026
 $
 $298,347
As of December 31, 2015:
Life insurance
 $2,905,136
 $45,495,431
 $
 $324,850
As of December 31, 2014:
Life insurance
 $2,058,556
 $39,802,861
 $
 $365,819
 $2,058,556
 $39,802,861
 $
 $365,819
As of December 31, 2013:
Life insurance
 $2,426,652
 $35,789,655
 $
 $418,033
As of December 31, 2012:
Life insurance
 $1,709,799
 $31,773,988
 $
 $455,752

Column A Column F Column G Column H Column I Column J Column F Column G Column H Column I Column J
 
Premium
revenue
 
Net
investment
income
 
Benefits,
claims,
losses and
settlement
expenses
 
Amortization
of deferred
policy
acquisition
costs
 
Other
operating
expenses
 
Premium
revenue
 
Net
investment
income
 
Benefits,
claims,
losses and
settlement
expenses
 
Amortization
of deferred
policy
acquisition
costs
 
Other
operating
expenses
 (Dollars in thousands) (Dollars in thousands)
For the year ended December 31, 2016:
Life insurance
 $217,346
 $1,849,872
 $1,572,586
 $374,012
 $143,437
For the year ended December 31, 2015:
Life insurance
 $172,216
 $1,692,192
 $758,203
 $286,114
 $137,306
For the year ended December 31, 2014:
Life insurance
 $151,613
 $1,531,667
 $1,679,255
 $163,578
 $130,076
 $151,613
 $1,531,667
 $1,679,255
 $163,578
 $130,076
For the year ended December 31, 2013:
Life insurance
 $148,938
 $1,383,927
 $1,713,019
 $365,468
 $142,873
For the year ended December 31, 2012:
Life insurance
 $165,681
 $1,286,923
 $1,264,016
 $164,919
 $137,432
See accompanying Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm.


F-55


Schedule IV—Reinsurance

AMERICAN EQUITY INVESTMENT LIFE HOLDING COMPANY

Column A Column B Column C Column D Column E Column F Column B Column C Column D Column E Column F
 Gross amount 
Ceded to
other
companies
 
Assumed
from
other
companies
 Net amount 
Percent of
amount
assumed
to net
 Gross amount 
Ceded to
other
companies
 
Assumed
from
other
companies
 Net amount 
Percent of
amount
assumed
to net
 (Dollars in thousands)
Year ended December 31, 2016          
Life insurance in force, at end of year $1,996,446
 $10,045
 $57,849
 $2,044,250
 2.83%
Insurance premiums and other considerations: 
        
Annuity product charges $178,945
 $5,366
 $
 $173,579
 
Traditional life, accident and health insurance, and life contingent immediate annuity premiums 43,521
 251
 497
 43,767
 1.14%
 $222,466
 $5,617
 $497
 $217,346
 0.23%
Year ended December 31, 2015 
        
Life insurance in force, at end of year $2,036,690
 $10,677
 $56,882
 $2,082,895
 2.73%
Insurance premiums and other considerations: 
        
Annuity product charges $141,595
 $5,427
 $
 $136,168
 
Traditional life, accident and health insurance, and life contingent immediate annuity premiums 35,715
 256
 589
 36,048
 1.63%
 (Dollars in thousands) $177,310
 $5,683
 $589
 $172,216
 0.34%
Year ended December 31, 2014           
        
Life insurance in force, at end of year $2,171,426
 $11,548
 $56,509
 $2,216,387
 2.55% $2,171,426
 $11,548
 $56,509
 $2,216,387
 2.55%
Insurance premiums and other considerations: 
         
        
Annuity product charges $124,946
 $5,956
 $
 $118,990
 
 $124,946
 $5,956
 $
 $118,990
 
Traditional life, accident and health insurance, and life contingent immediate annuity premiums 32,308
 336
 651
 32,623
 2.00% 32,308
 336
 651
 32,623
 2.00%
 $157,254
 $6,292
 $651
 $151,613
 0.43% $157,254
 $6,292
 $651
 $151,613
 0.43%
Year ended December 31, 2013 
        
Life insurance in force, at end of year $2,250,112
 $13,521
 $57,976
 $2,294,567
 2.53%
Insurance premiums and other considerations: 
        
Annuity product charges $110,142
 $6,551
 $
 $103,591
 
Traditional life, accident and health insurance, and life contingent immediate annuity premiums 45,057
 328
 618
 45,347
 1.36%
 $155,199
 $6,879
 $618
 $148,938
 0.41%
Year ended December 31, 2012 
        
Life insurance in force, at end of year $2,350,473
 $4,742
 $61,488
 $2,407,219
 2.55%
Insurance premiums and other considerations: 
        
Annuity product charges $95,802
 $6,796
 $
 $89,006
 
Traditional life, accident and health insurance, and life contingent immediate annuity premiums 76,323
 364
 716
 76,675
 0.93%
 $172,125
 $7,160
 $716
 $165,681
 0.43%

See accompanying Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm.

F-56


Schedule V—Valuation and Qualifying Accounts

AMERICAN EQUITY INVESTMENT LIFE HOLDING COMPANY

Balance
January 1,
 
Charged to Costs
and Expenses
 
Translation
Adjustment
 
Write-offs/
Payments/Other
 
Balance
December 31,
Balance
January 1,
 
Charged to Costs
and Expenses
 
Translation
Adjustment
 
Write-offs/
Payments/Other
 
Balance
December 31,
(Dollars in thousands(Dollars in thousands
Year ended December 31, 2016         
Valuation allowance on mortgage loans$(14,142) $(4,846) $
 $10,561
 $(8,427)
         
Year ended December 31, 2015         
Valuation allowance on mortgage loans$(22,633) $1,018
 $
 $7,473
 $(14,142)
         
Year ended December 31, 2014                  
Valuation allowance on mortgage loans$(26,047) $(6,052) $
 $9,466
 $(22,633)$(26,047) $(6,052) $
 $9,466
 $(22,633)
         
Year ended December 31, 2013         
Valuation allowance on mortgage loans$(34,234) $(5,621) $
 $13,808
 $(26,047)
         
Year ended December 31, 2012         
Valuation allowance on mortgage loans$(32,964) $(16,832) $
 $15,562
 $(34,234)

See accompanying Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm.


F-57


Item 15.    Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules.

(a)   Exhibits:
Exhibit No. Description
3.1 Articles of Incorporation, including Articles of Amendment (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to Post-Effective Amendment No. 1 to the Registration Statement on Form 10, filed on July 22, 1999, File No. 000-25985)
3.2Articles of Amendment to Articles of Incorporation (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2000 filed on August 14, 2000, File No. 000-25986)000-25985)
3.23.3 Articles of Amendment to Articles of Incorporation (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to Pre-Effective Amendment No. 1 to the Registration Statement on Form S-1 filed on October 20, 2003, File No. 333-108794, including all pre-effective amendments thereto)333-108794)
3.33.4 Articles of Amendment to Articles of Incorporation (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.3 to the Registration Statement on Form S-3 filed on January 15, 2008, File No. 333-148681)
3.4Third Amended and Restated Bylaws (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to Form 8-K filed on September 2, 2008, File No. 001-31911)
3.5 Articles of Amendment to Articles of Incorporation (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.5 to Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2011 filed on August 5, 2011, File No. 001-31911)
3.6Third Amended and Restated Bylaws (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to Form 8-K filed on September 2, 2008, File No. 001-31911)
4.1 Indenture dated October 29, 1999 between American Equity Investment Life Holding Company and Wilmington Trust Company (as successor in interest to West Des Moines State Bank), as trustee (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.19 to the Registration Statement on Form S-1, File No. 333-108794, including all pre-effective amendments thereto)
4.2 Trust Preferred Securities Guarantee Agreement dated October 29, 1999 between American Equity Investment Life Holding Company and Wilmington Trust Company (as successor in interest to West Des Moines State Bank), as trustee (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.20 to the Registration Statement on Form S-1, File No. 333-108794, including all pre-effective amendments thereto)
4.3 Trust Common Securities Guarantee Agreement dated October 29, 1999 between American Equity Investment Life Holding Company and West Des Moines State Bank, as trustee (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.21 to the Registration Statement on Form S-1, File No. 333-108794, including all pre-effective amendments thereto)
4.4 Instruments of Resignation, Appointment and Acceptance, effective September 12, 2006, among American Equity Investment Life Holding Company, Wilmington Trust Company, West Des Moines State Bank and Delaware Trust Company, National Association (formerly known as First Union Trust Company, National Association) (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.10A to Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008 filed on March 16, 2009)
4.5 Indenture dated December 16, 2003, between American Equity Investment Life Holding Company and Wilmington Trust Company, as trustee (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.11 to Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003 filed on March 4, 2004)
4.6 Guarantee Agreement dated December 16, 2003, between American Equity Investment Life Holding Company and Wilmington Trust Company, as trustee (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.12 to Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003 filed on March 4, 2004)
4.7 Indenture dated April 29, 2004, between American Equity Investment Life Holding Company and JP Morgan Chase Bank, National Association, as trustee (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.13 to Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2004 filed on November 9, 2004)
4.8 Guarantee Agreement dated April 29, 2004, between American Equity Investment Life Holding Company and JP Morgan Chase Bank, National Association, as trustee (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.14 to Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2004 filed on November 9, 2004)
4.9 Indenture dated September 14, 2004, between American Equity Investment Life Holding Company and JP Morgan Chase Bank, National Association, as trustee (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.15 to Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2004 filed on November 9, 2004)
4.10 Guarantee Agreement dated September 14, 2004, between American Equity Investment Life Holding Company and JP Morgan Chase Bank, National Association, as trustee (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.16 to Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2004 filed on November 9, 2004)
4.11 Indenture dated December 22, 2004, between American Equity Investment Life Holding Company and JP Morgan Chase Bank, National Association, as trustee (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.17 to Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004 filed on March 14, 2005)
4.12 Guarantee Agreement dated December 22, 2004, between American Equity Investment Life Holding Company and JP Morgan Chase Bank, National Association, as trustee (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.18 to Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004 filed on March 14, 2005)
4.13 Indenture dated June 15, 2005 between American Equity Investment Life Holding Company and JP Morgan Chase Bank, National Association, as trustee (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.23 to Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2005 filed on August 4, 2005)
4.14 Guarantee Agreement dated June 15, 2005 between American Equity Investment Life Holding Company and JP Morgan Chase Bank, National Association, as trustee (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.24 to Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2005 filed on August 4, 2005)
4.15 Indenture dated August 4, 2005 between American Equity Investment Life Holding Company and JP Morgan Chase Bank, National Association, as trustee (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.25 to Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2005 filed on November 4, 2005)
4.16 Guarantee Agreement dated August 4, 2005 between American Equity Investment Life Holding Company and JP Morgan Chase Bank, National Association, as trustee (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.26 to Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2005 filed on November 4, 2005)
4.17 Indenture dated December 15, 2005 between American Equity Investment Life Holding Company and JP Morgan Chase Bank, National Association, as trustee (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.27 to Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005 filed on March 14, 2006)
4.18 Guarantee Agreement dated December 15, 2005 between American Equity Investment Life Holding Company and JP Morgan Chase Bank, National Association, as trustee (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.28 to Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005 filed on March 14, 2006)
4.19 Amended and Restated Indenture dated July 7, 2006 between American Equity Investment Life Holding Company and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as trustee (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.31 to Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2006 filed on November 3, 2006)

F-58


Exhibit No. Description
4.20 Amended and Restated Guarantee Agreement dated July 7, 2006 between American Equity Investment Life Holding Company and Wells Fargo Delaware Trust Company, as trustee (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.32 to Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2006 filed on November 3, 2006)
4.21 Indenture dated September 22, 2010 between American Equity Investment Life Holding Company and U.S. Bank National Association, as trustee (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Form 8-K filed on September 28, 2010)
4.22Senior Amended and Restated Indenture, dated as of April 22, 2004, between American Equity Investment Life Holding Company and U.S. Bank National Association, as trustee (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Amendment No.1 to Form S-3 filed on April 22, 2004).
4.234.22 First Supplemental Indenture, dated July 17, 2013, among American Equity Investment Life Holding Company, U.S. Bank National Association, and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as trustee (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to Form 8-K filed on July 17, 2013)
4.244.23 Second Supplemental Indenture, dated as of July 17, 2013, between American Equity Investment Life Holding Company and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as trustee (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.3 to Form 8-K filed on July 17, 2013)
10.1 * Deferred Compensation Agreement between American Equity Investment Life Holding Company and David S. Mulcahy dated December 31, 1997 (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 to the Registration Statement on Form 10 filed on May 6, 1999)
10.2 * 2000 Employee Stock Option Plan (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.7 to Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2000 filed on August 14, 2000)
10.3 * 2000 Director Stock Option Plan (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.8 to Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2000 filed on August 14, 2000)
10.4 * American Equity Investment Life Holding Company 2009 Employee Incentive Plan (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to Form 8-K filed on June 9, 2009)
10.5Coinsurance Agreement dated December 19, 2001, including First Amendment dated February 26, 2002 between American Equity Investment Life Insurance Company and EquiTrust Life Insurance Company (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.10 to Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2001 filed on April 1, 2002)
10.6Coinsurance Agreement dated December 29, 2003 between American Equity Investment Life Insurance Company and EquiTrust Life Insurance Company (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.10-A to Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003 filed on April 1, 2002)
10.7First Amendment to Coinsurance Agreement dated July 30, 2004 between American Equity Investment Life Insurance Company and EquiTrust Life Insurance Company (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.10-B to Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2004 filed on August 4, 2004)
10.8 * Form of Change in Control Agreement between American Equity Investment Life Holding Company and each of John M. Matovina and Debra J. Richardson (Incorporated by reference to the Registration Statement on Form S-1, File No. 333-108794, including all pre-effective amendments thereto)
10.910.6 * Form of Amendment to Change in Control Agreement between American Equity Investment Life Holding Company and each of John M. Matovina and Debra J. Richardson (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.11-A to Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012 filed on March 7, 2013)
10.1010.7 American Equity Investment Life Holding Company Independent Insurance Agent Stock Option Plan (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.26 to Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2007 filed on November 2, 2007)
10.1110.8 Coinsurance Agreement effective July 1, 2009, between American Equity Investment Life Insurance Company and Athene Life Re Ltd (Treaty #070109) (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.29 to Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2009 filed on November 9, 2009)
10.1210.9 Coinsurance Agreement effective July 1, 2009, between American Equity Investment Life Insurance Company and Athene Life Re Ltd (Treaty #08042009) (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.29 to Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2009 filed on November 9, 2009)
10.1310.10 * Amended Retirement Benefit Agreement, dated as of March 29, 2010, between American Equity Investment Life Holding Company and David J. Noble (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Form 8-K filed on April 2, 2010)
10.1410.11 * Amended and Restated Retirement Benefit Agreement by and between American Equity Investment Life Holding Company Short-Term Performance Incentive Planand David J. Noble (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.210.3 to Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2010 filed on November 9, 2010)May 10, 2016)
10.1510.12 2010 Independent Insurance Agent Stock Option Plan (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.1 to the Registration Statement on Form S-3 filed on December 15, 2010)
10.1610.13 * American Equity Investment Life Holding Company 2011 Director Stock Option Plan (Incorporated by reference to Appendix A to Schedule 14A Definitive Proxy Statement for the 2011 annual meeting of stockholders filed on April 25, 2011)
10.17Second Amendment to Coinsurance Agreement effective August 1, 2001 between American Equity Investment Life Insurance Company and EquiTrust Life Insurance Company (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.36 to Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2011 filed on November 7, 2011)
10.18Second Amendment to Coinsurance Agreement effective January 1, 2004 between American Equity Investment Life Insurance Company and EquiTrust Life Insurance Company (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.37 to Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2011 filed on November 7, 2011)
10.1910.14 2012 Independent Insurance Agent Stock Option Plan (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Registration Statement on Form S-3 filed on August 23, 2012)
10.2010.15 * Form of Change in Control Agreement between American Equity Investment Life Holding Company and each of Ted M. Johnson, Ronald J. Grensteiner, Jeffrey D. Lorenzen and William R. KunkelRenee D. Montz (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Form 8-K filed on December 13, 2012)
10.21Form of Change in Control Agreement between American Equity Investment Life Holding Company and Jeffrey D. Lorenzen (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.42 to Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012 filed on March 7, 2013)
10.2210.16 * American Equity Investment Life Holding Company Short-Term Performance Incentive Plan adopted April 15, 2013, as amended and restated (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Form 8-K filed on April 15, 2013)
10.2310.17 * Form of Restricted Stock Award Agreement with respect to Common Stock of American Equity Investment Life Holding Company-Nonperformance Based (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2013 filed on May 8, 2013)
10.2410.18 * Form of Performance Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2013 filed on May 8, 2013)

F-59


Exhibit No.10.19 * DescriptionForm of First Amendment to the Performance Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Form 10-Q filed on May 10, 2016)
10.2510.20 * Form of Restricted Stock Award Agreement with respect to Common Stock of American Equity Investment Life Holding Company-Performance Based (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2013 filed on May 8, 2013)
10.2610.21 * Form of Change in Control Agreement between American Equity Investment Life Holding Company and Scott A,A. Samuelson (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2013 filed on August 8, 2013)
10.2710.22 * 2013 Director Equity and Incentive Plan (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2013 filed on August 8, 2013)
10.2810.23 Credit Agreement dated November 22, 2013September 30, 2016 among American Equity Life Investment Holding Company, JP Morgan Chase Bank, National Association, and SunTrust Bank, and Citibank, National Association and Royal Bank of Canada (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Form 8-K filed on November 26, 2013)October 3, 2016)
10.2910.24 Amended and Restated American Equity Investment Life Holding Company 2014 Independent Insurance Agent Restricted Stock and Restricted Stock Unit Plan (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Registration Statement on Form S-3 filed on December 17, 2014)
10.25Amended and Restated American Equity Investment Life Holding Company 2014 Independent Insurance Agent Restricted Stock and Restricted Stock Unit Plan, as amended (Incorporated by reference to the Appendix B to the Company's proxy statement on Form DEF 14A filed on April 18, 2016)
10.26Confirmation, dated August 6, 2015, by and between American Equity Life Investment Holding Company and RBC Capital Markets, LLC, as agent for Royal Bank of Canada (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Form 8-K filed on August 12, 2015)

Exhibit No.Description
10.27Confirmation, dated August 11, 2015, by and between American Equity Life Investment Holding Company and RBC Capital Markets, LLC, as agent for Royal Bank of Canada (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to Form 8-K filed on August 12, 2015)
10.28 *Form of Restricted Stock Cancellation Agreement (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2016 filed on May 10, 2016)
10.29 *American Equity Investment Life Holding Company 2016 Employee Incentive Plan (Incorporated by reference to the Appendix A to the Company's proxy statement on Form DEF 14A filed on April 18, 2016)
10.30 *First Amendment to American Equity Investment Life Holding Company 2016 Employee Incentive Plan (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.2 to Form S-8 filed on September 8, 2016)
10.31 *Form of Restricted Stock Award Agreement with Respect to Common Stock of American Equity Investment Life Holding Company (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Form 8-K filed on June 8, 2016)
10.32 *Form of Performance Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to Form 8-K filed on June 8, 2016)
10.33 *Form of First Amendment to Employee Stock Option Agreements between American Equity Investment Life Holding Company and each of David J. Noble and Debra J. Richardson (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to Form 10-Q filed on August 9, 2016)
10.34 *Retirement and Transition Agreement by and between American Equity Investment Life Holding Company and Debra J. Richardson (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to Form 10-Q filed on August 9, 2016)
12.1 Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges
21.2 Subsidiaries of American Equity Investment Life Holding Company
23.1 Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
31.1 Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
31.2 Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
32.1 Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
32.2 Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

*Denotes management contract or compensatory plan.

F-60F-55