UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D. C. 20549

FORM 10-K

[Ÿ]
 ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
  
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 for the fiscal year ended
December 31, 20162019
   
  OR
   
[  ] TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from ____________ to _________________
 
Commission file number 1-13163
                        
YUM! BRANDS, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

 North Carolina 13-3951308
 (State or other jurisdiction of (I.R.S. Employer
 incorporation or organization) Identification No.)
    
 1441 Gardiner Lane,Louisville,Kentucky 40213
 (Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)
    
Registrant’s telephone number, including area code:(502) 874-8300
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the ActAct:
    
 Title of Each ClassTrading Symbol(s)Name of Each Exchange on Which Registered
 Common Stock, no par valueYUMNew York Stock Exchange
  
 Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
 None

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.  Yes üYes No
 
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes Noü
 
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes üYes No
 
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Website, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes üYes No
 
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. [ü]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer”, “accelerated filer” and, “smaller reporting company”, and "emerging growth company" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act (Check one):  Large accelerated filer:  [Act.
Large Accelerated FilerAccelerated Filer
Non-accelerated FilerSmaller Reporting Company
Emerging Growth Company

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ü] Accelerated filer:  [  ] Non-accelerated filer:  [  ] Smaller reporting company:  [  ]
 
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).  Yes No ü




The aggregate market value of the voting stock (which consists solely of shares of Common Stock) held by non-affiliates of the registrant as of June 11, 201630, 2019 computed by reference to the closing price of the registrant’s Common Stock on the New York Stock Exchange Composite Tape on such date was approximately $31.1$33.6 billion.  All executive officers and directors of the registrant have been deemed, solely for the purpose of the foregoing calculation, to be “affiliates” of the registrant.  The number of shares outstanding of the registrant’s Common Stock as of February 14, 201712, 2020 was 353,844,095300,822,322 shares.

Documents Incorporated by Reference

Portions of the definitive proxy statement furnished to shareholders of the registrant in connection with the annual meeting of shareholders to be held on May 19, 201714, 2020 are incorporated by reference into Part III.




Forward-Looking Statements


In this Form 10-K, as well as in other written reports and oral statements, we present “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.  We intend all forward-looking statements to be covered by the safe harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, and we are including this statement for purposes of complying with those safe harbor provisions.

Forward-looking statements can be identified by the fact that they do not relate strictly to historical or current facts and by the use of forward-looking words such as “expect,” “expectation,” “believe,” “anticipate,” “may,” “could,” “intend,” “belief,” “plan,” “estimate,” “target,” “predict,” “likely,” “seek,” “project,” “model,” “ongoing,” “will,” “should,” “forecast,” “outlook” or similar terminology. Forward-looking statements are based on our current expectations, estimates, assumptions and/or projections, as well as our perception of historical trends and current conditions, as well as other factors that we believe are appropriate and reasonable under the circumstances. Forward-looking statements are neither predictions nor guarantees of future events, circumstances or performance and are inherently subject to known and unknown risks, uncertainties and assumptions that could cause our actual results to differ materially from those indicated by those statements. There can be no assurance that our expectations, estimates, assumptions and/or projections will be achieved. Factors that could cause actual results and events to differ materially from our expectations and forward-looking statements include (i) the risks and uncertainties described in the Risk Factors included in Part I, Item 1A of this Form 10-K and (ii) the factors described in Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations included in Part II, Item 7 of this Form 10-K.  You should not place undue reliance on forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date hereof.they are made. The forward-looking statements included in this Form 10-K are only made as of the date of this Form 10-K and we disclaim any obligation to publicly update any forward-looking statement to reflect subsequent events or circumstances.

2



PART I
Item 1.Business.

YUM!Yum! Brands, Inc. (referred to herein as “YUM”, the “Registrant” or the “Company”), was incorporated under the laws of the state of North Carolina in 1997.  The principal executive offices of YUM are located at 1441 Gardiner Lane, Louisville, Kentucky 40213, and the telephone number at that location is (502) 874-8300. Our website address is http:https://yum.comwww.yum.com.

YUM, together with its subsidiaries, is referred to in this Form 10-K annual report (“Form 10-K”) as the Company.  The terms “we,” “us” and “our” are also used in the Form 10-K to refer to the Company.  Throughout this Form 10-K, the terms “restaurants,” “stores” and “units” are used interchangeably. While YUM! Brands, Inc., referred to as the Company,YUM does not directly own or operate any restaurants, throughout this document we may refer to restaurants that are owned or operated by our subsidiaries as being Company-owned.

Financial Information about Operating Segments and General DevelopmentOverview of the Business

As of December 31, 2016, YUM consists of three operating segments:  

The KFC Division which includes the worldwide operations of the KFC concept
The Pizza Hut Division which includes the worldwide operations of the Pizza Hut concept
The Taco Bell Division which includes the worldwide operations of the Taco Bell concept

Effective January 2016, the India Division was segmented by brand, integrated into the global KFC, Pizza Hut and Taco Bell Divisions, and is no longer a separate operating segment. While our consolidated results were not impacted, we have restated our historical segment information for consistent presentation.

On October 31, 2016 (the “Distribution Date”), we completed the spin-off of our China business (the "Separation") into an independent, publicly-traded company under the name of Yum China Holdings, Inc. (“Yum China”). On the Distribution Date, we distributed to each of our shareholders of record as of the close of business on October 19, 2016 (the “Record Date”) one share of Yum China common stock for each share of our Common Stock held as of the Record Date. The distribution was structured to be a tax free distribution to our U.S. shareholders for federal income tax purposes in the United States. Yum China’s common stock now trades on the New York Stock Exchange ("NYSE") under the symbol “YUMC.” After the distribution, we do not beneficially own any shares of Yum China common stock.

Concurrent with the Separation, a subsidiary of the Company entered into a Master License Agreement with a subsidiary of Yum China for the exclusive right to use and sublicense the use of intellectual property owned by YUM and its affiliates for the development and operation of KFC, Pizza Hut and Taco Bell restaurants in China. Prior to the Separation, our operations in mainland China were reported in our former China Division segment results. As a result of the Separation, the results of operations, assets and liabilities, and cash flows of the separated business are presented as discontinued operations in our Consolidated Statements of Income, Consolidated Balance Sheets and Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for all periods presented. See additional information related to the impact of the Separation in Item 8, Note 4 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

Operating segment information for the years ended December 31, 2016, December 26, 2015 and December 27, 2014 for the Company is included in Part II, Item 7, Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations ("MD&A") and in the related Consolidated Financial Statements in Part II, Item 8.

Narrative Description of Business

General

YUM has over 43,50050,000 restaurants in more than 135150 countries and territories.  Throughterritories primarily operating under the three concepts of KFC, Pizza Hut and Taco Bell (the “Concepts”),.  These three concepts are global leaders of the Company develops, operates or franchises a worldwide systemchicken, pizza and Mexican-style food categories, respectively. At December 31, 2019, 98% of restaurants which prepare, package and sell a menu of competitively priced food items.  Unitsour units are operated by a Concept or by independent franchisees or licensees under the terms of franchise or license agreements, which require payment of sales-based fees for use of our Concepts' brands.agreements.  The terms "franchise" or "franchisee" within this Form 10-K are meant to describe third parties that operate units under either franchise or license agreements. Franchisees can range in size from individuals owning just one restaurant to large publicly-traded companies.  



Restaurant Concepts

Most restaurants in each Concept offer consumers the ability to dine in and/or carry out food.  In addition, Taco Bell and KFC offer a drive-thru option in many stores.  Pizza Hut offers a drive-thru option on a much more limited basis.  Pizza Hut typically offers delivery service, as does KFC on a more limited basis primarily in China.

Each Concept has proprietary menu items and emphasizes the preparation of food with high quality ingredients, as well as unique recipes and special seasonings to provide appealing, tasty and convenient food at competitive prices.

The franchise programs of the Company are designed to promote consistency and quality, and the Company is selective in granting franchises.  The Company utilizes both store-level franchise and master franchise programs to grow its businesses. Under store-level franchise agreements, franchisees supply capital – initially by paying a franchise fee to YUM, by purchasing or leasing the land, building, equipment, signs, seating, inventories and supplies and, over the longer term, by reinvesting in the business.  Franchisees contribute to the Company’s revenues on an ongoing basis through the payment of royalties based on a percentage of sales (usually 4% - 6%). Under master franchise arrangements, the Company enters into agreements that allow master franchisees to operate restaurants as well as sub-franchise within certain geographic territories. Master franchisees are responsible for overseeing development within their territories and collect initial fees and royalties from sub-franchisees. Master franchisees often pay royalties at a reduced rate to the Company. Our largest master franchisee, Yum China, pays a 3% license fee on system sales of our Concepts in mainland China to the Company.

The Company believes that it is important to maintain strong and open relationships with its franchisees and their representatives.  To this end, the Company invests a significant amount of time working with the franchisee community and their representative organizations on key aspects of the business, including products, equipment, operational improvements and standards and management techniques.

Following is a summary of our Concepts' operations and a brief description of each Concept:Concept as of and for the year ended December 31, 2019:

  Number of Units % of Units International Number of Countries and Territories % Franchised 
System Sales(a) (in Millions)
 
KFC Division 24,104
 83% 144
 99% $27,900
 
Pizza Hut Division 18,703
 61% 113
 99% 12,900
 
Taco Bell Division 7,363
 8% 30
 94% 11,784
 
YUM 50,170
 64% 152
 98% $52,584
 
            
(a)Constitutes sales of all restaurants, both Company-owned and franchised. See further discussion of this non-GAAP measure within Part II, Item 7 of this Form 10-K.

KFC

KFC was founded in Corbin, Kentucky by Colonel Harland D. Sanders, an early developer of the quick service food business and a pioneer of the restaurant franchise concept.  The Colonel perfected his secret blend of 11 herbs and spices for Kentucky Fried Chicken in 1939 and signed up his first franchisee in 1952.

KFC operates in 128 countries and territories throughout the world.  As of year end 2016, KFC had 20,604 units.  93 percent of the KFC units are franchised.

KFC restaurants across the world offer fried and non-fried chicken products such as sandwiches, chicken strips, chicken-on-the-bone and other chicken products marketed under a variety of names. KFC restaurants also offer a variety of entrees and side items suited to local preferences and tastes.  Restaurant decor throughout the world is characterized by the image of the Colonel.

Pizza Hut

The first Pizza Hut restaurant was opened in 1958 in Wichita, Kansas, and within a year, the first franchise unit was opened.  Today, Pizza Hut is the largest restaurant chain in the world specializing in the sale of ready-to-eat pizza products.

Pizza Hut operates in 103 countries and territories throughout the world. As of year end 2016, Pizza Hut had 16,409 units.  97 percent of the Pizza Hut units are franchised.

Pizza Hut operates in the delivery, carryout and casual dining segments around the world. Outside of the U.S., Pizza Hut often uses unique branding to differentiate these segments. Additionally, a growing percentage of Pizza Hut's customer orders are being generated digitally.

Pizza Hut features a variety of pizzas which are marketed under varying names.  Each of these pizzas is offered with a variety of different toppings suited to local preferences and tastes.  Many Pizza Huts also offer pasta and chicken wings, including approximately 5,900 stores offering wings under the brand WingStreet in the U.S. Outside the U.S., Pizza Hut casual dining restaurants offer a variety of core menu products other than pizza, which are typically suited to local preferences and tastes. Pizza Hut units feature a distinctive red roof logo on their signage.



Taco Bell

The first Taco Bell restaurant was opened in 1962 by Glen Bell in Downey, California, and in 1964, the first Taco Bell franchise was sold.

Taco Bell operates in 22 countries and territories throughout the world. As of year end 2016, there were 6,604 Taco Bell units, primarily in the U.S. 87 percent of the Taco Bell units are franchised.

Taco Bell specializes in Mexican-style food products, including various types of tacos, burritos, quesadillas, salads, nachos and other related items.



Business Strategy

Through our Recipe for Growth and Good we intend to unlock the growth potential of our Concepts and YUM, drive increased collaboration across our Concepts and geographies and consistently deliver better customer experiences, improved economics and higher rates of growth. Key enablers include accelerated use of technology and better leverage of our systemwide scale.

Our Recipe for Growth is based on four key drivers:

Unrivaled Culture and Talent: Leverage our culture and people capability to fuel brand performance and franchise success
Unmatched Operating Capability: Recruit and equip the best restaurant operators in the world to deliver great customer experiences
Relevant, Easy and Distinctive Brands: Innovate and elevate iconic restaurant brands people trust and champion
Bold Restaurant Development: Drive market and franchise expansion with strong economics and value

Our Recipe for Good reflects our global citizenship and sustainability strategy and practices, while reinforcing our public commitment to drive socially responsible growth, risk management and sustainable stewardship of our food, planet and people.  

Information about Operating Segments

As of December 31, 2019, YUM consists of three operating segments:  

The KFC Division which includes the worldwide operations of the KFC concept
The Pizza Hut Division which includes the worldwide operations of the Pizza Hut concept
The Taco Bell offers breakfast items in its U.S. stores.Division which includes the worldwide operations of the Taco Bell concept

Franchise Agreements

The franchise programs of the Company are designed to promote consistency and quality, and the Company is selective in granting franchises.  The Company is focused on partnering with franchisees who have the commitment, capability and capitalization to grow our Concepts. Franchisees can range in size from individuals owning just one restaurant to large publicly-traded companies.  

The Company utilizes both store-level franchise and master franchise programs to grow its businesses.  Of our over 49,000 franchised units featureat December 31, 2019, approximately 30% operate under our master franchise programs, including over 8,800 units in mainland China.   The remainder of our franchise units operate under store-level franchise agreements. Under both types of franchise programs, franchisees supply capital by purchasing or leasing the land, building, equipment, signs, seating, inventories and supplies and, over the longer term, by reinvesting in the business.  In certain historical refranchising transactions the Company may have retained ownership of land and building and continues to lease them to the franchisee.  Store-level franchise agreements  typically require  payment to the Company of certain upfront fees such as initial fees paid upon opening of a distinctive bell logostore, fees paid to renew the term of the franchise agreement and fees paid in the event the franchise agreement is transferred to another franchisee.  Franchisees also pay monthly continuing fees based on a percentage of their signage.restaurants' sales (typically 4% - 6%) and are required to spend a certain amount to advertise and promote the brand.  Under master franchise arrangements, the Company enters into agreements that allow master franchisees to operate restaurants as well as sub-franchise restaurants within certain geographic territories.  Master franchisees are typically responsible for overseeing development within their territories and performing certain other administrative duties with regard to the oversight of sub-franchisees. In exchange, master franchisees retain a certain percentage of fees payable by the sub-franchisees under their franchise agreements and typically pay lower fees for the restaurants they operate. Our largest master franchisee, Yum China, pays the Company a continuing fee of 3% on system sales of our Concepts in mainland China.

The Company seeks to maintain strong and open relationships with its franchisees and their representatives.  To this end, the Company invests a significant amount of time working with the franchisee community and their representative organizations on key aspects of the business, including products, equipment, operational improvements and standards and management techniques.

Restaurant Operations

Through its Concepts, YUM develops, operates and franchises a worldwide system of both traditional and non-traditional Quick Service Restaurants ("QSR").  Traditional units can feature dine-in, carryout, and, in some instances, drive-thru orand delivery services.  Non-traditional units include express units and kiosks whichthat have a more limited menu, usually generate lower sales volumes and operate in non-traditional locations like malls, airports, gasoline service stations, train stations, subways, convenience stores, stadiums, amusement parks and colleges, where a full-scale traditional outlet would not be practical or efficient.



Most restaurants in each Concept offer consumers the ability to dine in and/or carryout food.  In addition, Taco Bell and KFC offer a drive-thru option in many stores.  Pizza Hut offers a drive-thru option on a much more limited basis.  Pizza Hut typically offers delivery service, while, on a more limited but expanding basis, KFC and Taco Bell allow for consumers to have the Concepts' food delivered either through store-level or third-party delivery services.

Restaurant management structure varies by Concept and unit size.  Generally, each Concept-owned restaurant is led by a restaurant general manager (“RGM”), together with one or more assistant managers, depending on the operating complexity and sales volume of the restaurant.  Each Concept issues detailed manuals, which may then be customized to meet local regulations and customs. These manuals set forth standards and requirements for all aspects of restaurant operations, including food safety and quality, food handling and product preparation procedures, equipment maintenance, facility standards and accounting control procedures.  The restaurant management teams are responsible for the day-to-day operation of each unit and for ensuring compliance with operating standards. CHAMPS – which stands for Cleanliness, Hospitality, Accuracy, Maintenance, Product Quality and Speed of Service – is our proprietary systemwide program for training, measuring and rewarding employee performance against key customer measures.  CHAMPS is intended to align the operating processes of our entire system around one core set of standards. RGMs’ efforts, including CHAMPS performance measures, are monitored by Area Coaches, where sufficient scale allows.  Area Coaches typically work with approximately six to twelve restaurants.  Various senior operators visit restaurants from time to time to promote adherence to system standards and mentor restaurant team members.

Supply and Distribution

The Company and franchisees of the Concepts are substantial purchasers of a number of food and paper products, equipment and other restaurant supplies. The principal items purchased include chicken, cheese, beef and pork products, paper and packaging materials. The Company has not experienced any significant continuous shortages of supplies, and alternative sources for most of these products are generally available.  Prices paid for these supplies fluctuate.  When prices increase, the Concepts may attempt to pass on such increases to their customers, although there is no assurance that this can be done practically. The Company does not typically experience significant continuous shortages of supplies, and alternative sources for most of these products are generally available.  

In the U.S., the Company, along with the representatives of the Company’s KFC, Pizza Hut and Taco Bell franchisee groups, are members of Restaurant Supply Chain Solutions, LLC (“RSCS"), which is responsible for purchasing certain restaurant products and equipment.  The core mission of RSCS is to provide the lowest possible sustainable store-delivered prices for restaurant products and equipment.  This arrangement combines the purchasing power of the Company-owned and franchisee restaurants, which the Company believes leverages the system’s scale to drive cost savings and effectiveness in the purchasing function.  The Company also believes that RSCS fosters closer alignment of interests and a stronger relationship with its franchisee community.

Most food products, paper and packaging supplies, and equipment used in restaurant operations are distributed to individual restaurant units by third-party distribution companies.  In the U.S., McLane Foodservice, Inc. is the exclusive distributor for the majority of items used in Company-owned restaurants and for a substantial number of franchisee stores. 

Outside the U.S., we and our Concepts' franchisees primarily use decentralized sourcing and distribution systems involving many different global, regional and local suppliers and distributors.  WeOur international franchisees generally select and manage their own third-party suppliers, subject to our franchisees have approximately 5,800 foodinternal standards. All suppliers and paper suppliers, including U.S.-based suppliersdistributors are expected to provide products/services that export to many countries.comply with all applicable laws, rules and regulations in the state and/or country in which they operate as well as comply with our internal standards.


Advertising and Promotional Programs

Company-owned and franchise restaurants are required to spend a percentage of their respective restaurants’ sales on advertising programs with the goal of increasing sales and enhancing the reputation of the Concepts. Advertising may be conducted nationally, regionally and locally. When multiple franchisees operate in the same country or region the national and regional advertising spending is typically conducted by a cooperative to which the franchisees and Company-owned stores, if any, contribute funds as a percentage of restaurants’ sales. The contributions are primarily used to pay for expenses relating to purchasing media for advertising, market research, commercial production, talent payments and other support functions for the respective Concepts. We have the right to control the advertising activities of certain advertising cooperatives, typically in markets where we have Company-owned stores, through our majority voting rights.

Trademarks and Patents

The Company and its Concepts own numerous registered trademarks and service marks.  The Company believes that many of these marks, including its Kentucky Fried Chicken®, KFC®, Pizza Hut® and Taco Bell® marks, have significant value and are materially important to its business.  The Company’s policy is to pursue registration of its important marks whenever feasible and to oppose vigorously any infringement of its marks.  



The use of certain of these marks by franchisees has been authorized in our franchise agreements.  Under current law and with proper use, the Company’s rights in its marks can generally last indefinitely.  The Company also has certain patents on restaurant equipment which, while valuable, are not currently considered material to its business.

Working Capital

Information about the Company’s working capital is included in MD&A in Part II, Item 7 and the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows in Part II, Item 8.

Seasonal Operations

The Company does not consider its operations to be seasonal to any material degree.

Competition

The retail food industry, in which our Concepts compete, is made up of supermarkets, supercenters, warehouse stores, convenience stores, coffee shops, snack bars, delicatessens and restaurants (including those in the QSR segment), and is intensely competitive with respect to price and quality of food products, new product development, digital engagement, advertising levels and promotional initiatives, customer service reputation, restaurant location and attractiveness and maintenance of properties. Competition has also increased from and been enabled by delivery aggregators and other food delivery services has also increased in recent years, particularly in urbanized areas. The retail food industry is often affected by changes in consumer tastes; national, regional or local economic conditions; currency fluctuations; demographic trends; traffic patterns; the type, number and location of competing food retailers and products; and disposable purchasing power.  EachWithin the retail food industry, each of theour Concepts competes with international, national and regional restaurant chains as well as locally-owned restaurants,establishments, not only for customers, but also for management and hourly personnel, suitable real estate sites and qualified franchisees.  Given the various types and vast number of competitors, our Concepts do not constitute a significant portion of the retail food industry in terms of number of system units or system sales, either on a worldwide or individual country basis.

Research and Development (“R&D”)

The Company operates R&D facilities in Plano, Texas (KFC and Pizza Hut Divisions); Irvine, California (Taco Bell Division); Louisville, Kentucky (KFC U.S.) and several other locations outside the U.S.  In addition to Company R&D, we regularly also engage independent suppliers to conduct research and development activities for the benefit of the YUM system. The Company expensed $24 million, $24 million and $25 million in 2016, 2015 and 2014, respectively, for R&D activities.  

Environmental Matters

The Company is not aware of any federal, state or local environmental laws or regulations that will materially affect its earnings or competitive position, or result in material capital expenditures.  However, the Company cannot predict the effect on its operations of possible future environmental legislation or regulations.  During 20162019, there were no material capital expenditures for environmental control facilities and no such material expenditures are anticipated.

Government Regulation

U.S. Operations.  The Company and its U.S. operations, as well as our franchisees, are subject to various federal, state and local laws affecting its business, including laws and regulations concerning information security, labor and employment, health, marketing, food labeling, competition, public accommodation, sanitation and safety.  Each of theour and our Concepts’ franchisees' restaurants in the U.S. must comply with licensing requirements and regulationregulations promulgated by a number of governmental authorities, which include health, sanitation, safety, fire and zoning agencies in the state and/or municipality in which the restaurant is located.  In addition, each Concept must comply with various state and federal laws that regulate the franchisor/franchisee relationship.  To date, the Company has not been materially adversely affected by such licensing requirements and regulationregulations or by any difficulty, delay or failure to obtain required licenses or approvals.



International Operations.  The Company’sOur and our Concepts' franchisees' restaurants outside the U.S. are subject to national and local laws and regulations which are similar to those affecting U.S. restaurants.  The restaurants outside the U.S. are also subject to tariffs and regulations on imported commodities and equipment and laws regulating foreign investment, as well as anti-bribery and anti-corruption laws.  

See Item 1A "Risk Factors" for a discussion of risks relating to federal, state, local and international regulation of our business.



Employees

As of year end 20162019, the Company and its subsidiaries employed approximately 90,00034,000 persons. The Company believes that it provides working conditions and compensation that compare favorably with those of its principal competitors.  The majority of employees are paid on an hourly basis.  Some employees are subject to labor council relationships that vary due to the diverse culturescountries in which the Company operates.  The Company and its Concepts consider their employee relations to be good.

Financial Information about Geographic Areas

Financial information about our significant geographic areas is incorporated herein by reference from the related Consolidated Financial Statements in Part II, Item 8.

Available Information

The Company makes available, through the Investor Relations section of its internet website at http:https://yum.comwww.yum.com, its annual report on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K and amendments to those reports filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act, as soon as reasonably practicable after electronically filing such material with the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") at http:https://www.sec.gov.  These reports may also be obtained by visiting the SEC's Public Reference Room at 100 F Street, NE, Washington, DC 20549 or by calling the SEC at 1 (800) SEC-0330.

Our Corporate Governance Principles and our Code of Conduct are also located within the Investor Relations section of the Company's website.  The reference to the Company’s website address does not constitute incorporation by reference of the information contained on the website and should not be considered part of this document.  These documents, as well as our SEC filings, are available in print free of charge to any shareholder who requests a copy from our Investor Relations Department.

Item 1A.Risk Factors.

You should carefully review the risks described below as they identify important factors that could cause our actual results to differ materially from our forward-looking statements and historical trends. Any of the following risk factors, either by itself or together with other risk factors, could materially adversely affect our business, results of operations, cash flows and/or financial condition.

Food safety and food-borne illness concerns may have an adverse effect on our business.

Food-borne illnesses, such as E. coli, hepatitis A, trichinosisListeria, Salmonella and salmonella,Trichinosis, occur or may occur within our system from time to time.  In addition, food safety issues such as food tampering, contamination and adulteration occur or may occur within our system from time to time. Any report or publicity linking us or one of our Concepts’ restaurants, including restaurants operated by us or our Concepts’ franchisees, or linking our competitors or ourthe retail food industry generally, to instances of food-borne illness or food safety issues could adversely affect our Concepts’ brands and reputations as well as our revenues and profits, and possibly lead to product liability claims, litigation, governmental investigations or actions, and damages.  If a customer of one of our ConceptsConcepts’ restaurants becomes ill from food borne illnesses or as a result of food safety issues, restaurants in our system may be temporarily closed, which would decreasecould disrupt our revenues.operations and have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.  In addition, instances or allegations of food-borne illness or food safety issues, real or perceived, involving our restaurants, restaurants of competitors, or our suppliers or distributors (regardless of whether we use or have used those suppliers or distributors), or otherwise involving the types of food served at our restaurants, could result in negative publicity that could adversely affect either our sales or the sales of our Concepts’ franchisees.franchisees’ revenues and profits. The occurrence of food-borne illnesses or food safety issues could also adversely affect the price and availability of affected ingredients, which could result in disruptions in our supply chain and/or lower margins for us and our Concepts’ franchisees.

Health concerns arising from outbreaksthe outbreak of virusesa health epidemic or other diseasespandemic, including the coronavirus, may have an adverse effect on our business.

Our business could be materially and adversely affected by the outbreak of a widespread health epidemic or pandemic, including arising from various strains of avian flu or swine flu, such as H1N1.H1N1, or the coronavirus, particularly if located in regions from which we derive a significant amount of revenue or profit. The occurrence of such an outbreak of an epidemic illness or other adverse public health developments could materially disrupt our business and operations. Such events could also significantly impact our industry and cause a temporary closure of restaurants, which wouldcould severely disrupt our or our franchisees' operations and have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

In late 2019, a novel strain of coronavirus was first detected in Wuhan, China. Following the outbreak of this virus, the Chinese government has quarantined certain affected regions and certain travel restrictions have been imposed. We have a significant number of KFC and Pizza Hut Concept restaurants located in mainland China, operated by our master franchisee, Yum China. Many of our restaurants located within mainland China have been temporarily closed, have shortened operating hours and/or have otherwise been adversely affected by the impact of the coronavirus, and these developments have also impacted the ability of Yum


China's suppliers to provide food and other needed supplies at our Concepts’ restaurants in mainland China.  Additionally, other nearby franchisees, such as those in Hong Kong and Taiwan, have experienced significant sales declines as well. We are unable to accurately predict the impact that the coronavirus will have on our results of operations, due to uncertainties including the ultimate geographic spread of the virus within and outside of China, the severity of the disease, the duration of the outbreak, and actions that may be taken by governmental authorities to contain the coronavirus or to treat its impact.  However, while it is premature to accurately predict the ultimate impact of these developments, we expect our results for the quarter ending March 31, 2020 to be significantly impacted with potential continuing, adverse impacts beyond March 31, 2020.

OurIn addition, our operations could be disrupted if any of our employees or employees of our business partners were suspected of having the avian flu or swine flu, or other illnesses such as hepatitis A, norovirus or coronavirus, since this could require us or our business partners to quarantine some or all of such employees or disinfect our restaurant facilities. Outbreaks of avian flu occur from time to time around the world, and such outbreaks have resulted in confirmed human cases. It is possible that outbreaks could reach pandemic levels.  Public concern over avian flu generally may cause fear about the consumption of chicken, eggs and other products derived from poultry, which could cause customers to consume less poultry and related products. ThisBecause poultry is a menu offering for our Concepts, this would likely result in lower revenues and profits.profits for us and our Concepts’ franchisees. Avian flu outbreaks could also adversely affect the price and availability of poultry, which could negatively impact our profit margins and revenues.revenues for us and our Concepts' franchisees.

Furthermore, other viruses may be transmitted through human contact, and the risk of contracting viruses could cause employees or guests to avoid gathering in public places, which could adversely affect restaurant guest traffic or the ability to adequately staff restaurants.  We could also be adversely affected if jurisdictions in which our Concepts’ restaurants operategovernment authorities impose mandatory closures, seek voluntary closures, or impose restrictions on operations of restaurants.restaurants, or restrict the import or export of products, or if suppliers issue mass recalls of products.  Even if such measures are not implemented and a virus or other disease does not spread significantly, the perceived risk of infection or health risk may adversely affect our business.business and operating results.

Our operating results and growth strategies are closely and increasingly tied to the success of our Concepts’ franchisees.

A significant and growing portionThe vast majority (98%) of our restaurants are operated by our Concepts’ franchisees. In October 2016,franchisees, and our percentage of franchise-owned restaurants has increased in connection with the spin-off of our China business, we announced our plan to become at least 98% franchised by the end of 2018.recent years. Our refranchising efforts will increasehave increased our dependence on the financial success and cooperation of our Concepts’Concepts��� franchisees. In addition, our long-term system sales growth targets depend on an accelerationmaintaining the pace of our historical net system unit growth rate. Nearly all of this unit growth is expected to result from new unit openings by our Concepts’ franchisees. We increasingly also rely on master franchisees, who have rights to license to sub-franchisees the right to develop and operate restaurants, to achieve our expectations for new unit development. If our Concepts’ franchisees and master franchisees do not meet our expectations for new unit development, we may fall short of our system sales growth targets. In addition, we have franchise relationships that are particularly important to our business, such as our relationship with Yum China as described in a subsequent risk factor below, our strategic alliance with Telepizza Group S.A., who is the master franchisee of Pizza Hut in Latin America (excluding Brazil) and portions of Europe, and our relationship with certain large franchisees, such as NPC International, Inc. the largest operator of Pizza Hut restaurants in the United States. Any failure to realize the expected benefits of such franchise relationships may adversely impact our business and operating results.

We have limited control over how our Concepts’ franchisees’ businesses are run, and thetheir inability of franchisees to operate successfully could adversely affect our operating results through decreased royalty payments.fees paid to us for royalties, advertising funds contributions, and other discrete services we may provide to our Concept’s franchisees (e.g. management of e-commerce platform). If our Concepts’ franchisees fail to adequately capitalize their businesses or incur too much debt, if their operating expenses or commodity prices increase or if economic or sales trends deteriorate such that they are unable to operate profitably or repay existing debt, it could result in their financial distress, including insolvency or bankruptcy.bankruptcy, or the inability to meet development targets or obligations.  If a significant franchisee of one of our Concepts becomes, or a significant number of our Concepts’ franchisees in the aggregate become, financially distressed, our operating results could be impacted through reduced or delayed royalty payments.fee payments that cause us to record bad debt expense, reduced advertising fund contributions, and reduced new unit development. In addition, we are contingentlysecondarily liable on certain of our Concepts’ franchisees’ restaurant lease agreements, including lease agreements that we have guaranteed or assigned to franchisees in connection with the refranchising of certain Company restaurants, and ourCompany-owned restaurants. Our operating results could be impacted by any increased rent obligations for such leased properties.properties to the extent our Concepts’ franchisees default on such lease agreements. In addition, the failure of our Concepts’ franchisees to adequately engage in succession planning may adversely affect their restaurant operations and the development of new restaurants, which in turn could hurt our business.

Our success also depends on the willingness and ability of our Concepts’ franchisees to implement marketing programs and major initiatives such as restaurant remodels or equipment or technology upgrades, which may includerequire financial investment. Our Concepts may be unable to successfully implement strategies that we believe are necessary for further growth if their franchisees do not participate, which in turn may harm the growth prospects and financial condition of the Company. Additionally, the failure of our


Concepts’ franchisees to focus on the fundamentalskey elements of restaurant operations, such as quality, service and cleanliness (even if such failures do not rise to the level of breaching the related franchise documents), may be attributed by guests to our Concepts’ entire brand and could have a negative impact on our business.

Our reliance on master franchise arrangements can decrease our level of control over our Concepts' restaurants and increase certain risks arising from franchise operations. For example, we rely on our master franchisees to monitor and enforce sub-franchisee compliance with our operating standards, and a failure to comply with such standards could adversely affect our business.

We may not successfully implementachieve our transformation initiatives or fully realize the anticipated benefits from the transformation.target development goals, aggressive development could cannibalize existing sales and new restaurants may not be profitable.

On October 11, 2016, we announcedOur growth strategy depends on our strategic transformation plansand our Concepts’ franchisees’ ability to drive global expansionincrease the number of restaurants around the world.  The successful development of new units depends in large part on the ability of our KFC, Pizza Hut and Taco Bell brands following the spin-off of our China business. Among other things, this transformation includes a planConcepts’ franchisees to become at least 98% franchised by the end of 2018open new restaurants and to significantly reduce annual capital expendituresoperate these restaurants profitably. Effectively managing growth can be challenging, particularly as we expand into new markets internationally, and our general and administrative costs, each by the end of 2019. Wewe cannot assure youguarantee that we, or our Concepts’ franchisees, including Yum China, will be able to successfully implementachieve our transformation initiatives.expansion goals or that new restaurants will be operated profitably.  Further, our ability to achieve the anticipated benefits of this transformation, including the anticipated levels of cost savings and efficiency, within expected timeframes is subject to many estimates and assumptions, which are, in turn, subject to significant economic, competitive and other uncertainties, some of which are beyond our control. Therethere is no assurance that weany new restaurant will successfully implement, or fully realize the anticipated positive impactproduce operating results similar to those of our transformation initiativesexisting restaurants.  Other risks that could impact our ability to increase the number of our restaurants include prevailing economic conditions and trade or execute successfullyeconomic policies or sanctions, our ability to attract new franchisees, construction and development costs of new restaurants, and our, or our Concepts’ franchisees’, ability to obtain suitable restaurant locations, negotiate acceptable lease or purchase terms for the locations, obtain required permits and approvals in a timely manner, hire and train qualified management teams and restaurant crews, and meet construction schedules.

Expansion into markets could also be affected by our Concepts’ franchisees’ willingness to invest capital or ability to obtain financing to construct and open new restaurants.  If it becomes more difficult or more expensive for our Concepts’ franchisees to obtain financing to develop new restaurants, or if the perceived return on our transformation strategy, ininvested capital is not sufficiently attractive, the expected timeframes or at all. growth of our system could slow and our future revenues and operating cash flows could be adversely impacted.

In addition, therethe development of new restaurants could impact the sales of our Concepts’ existing restaurants nearby.  There can be no assurance that sales cannibalization will not occur or become more significant in the future as we increase our efforts, if properly executed, will resultpresence in our desired outcome of improved financial performance.existing markets.

We have significant exposure to the Chinese market through our largest franchisee, Yum China, which subjects us to risks that could negatively affect our business.

A significant portion of our total business is conducted in mainland China, particularly with respect to our KFC Concept. In connection with the spin-off of our China business in October 2016 into an independent publicly-traded company (the "Separation" or “Yum China spin-off”), we entered into a Master License Agreement with Yum China pursuant to which Yum China is the exclusive licensee of the KFC, Pizza Hut and Taco Bell Concepts and their related


marks and other intellectual property rights for restaurant services in mainland China. Following the spin-off,Separation, Yum China is nowbecame, and continues to be, our largest franchisee, and our overallfranchisee. Our financial results are significantly affected by Yum China’s results andas we are entitled to receive a 3% sales-based royalty on all Yum China system sales related to our Concepts. Yum China's business is exposed to risks in China. These risksmainland China, which include, among others, potential political, financial or social instability, changes in economic conditions (including consumer spending, unemployment levels and wage and commodity inflation), consumer preferences, the regulatory environment (including uncertainties with respect to the interpretation and enforcement of Chinese laws, rules and regulations), and tax laws and regulations including the tax treatment of the royalty paid to YUM, as well as increased media scrutiny of our businessConcepts and industry, fluctuations in foreign exchange rates, increased restrictions or tariffs on imported supplies as a result of trade disputes, any epidemics or pandemics arising out of mainland China, and increased competition.  In addition,Further, any significant or prolonged deterioration in U.S.-China relations could adversely affect our Concepts in mainland China operations if Chinese consumers reduce the frequency of their visits to Yum China’s restaurants.  Chinese law regulates the scope of ourYum China's business conducted within mainland China. Our royalty income from the Yum China business is therefore subject to numerous uncertainties based on the policies of the Chinese government, as they may change from time to time. If Yum China’s business is harmed or development of our Concepts’ restaurants is slowed in mainland China due to any of these factors, it could negatively impact the royalty paid by Yum China to us, which would negatively impact our financial results or our growth prospects.

Our relationship with Yum China is governed primarily by a Master License Agreement, which may be terminated upon the occurrence of certain events, such as the insolvency or bankruptcy of Yum China. In addition, if we are unable to enforce our intellectual property or contract rights in mainland China, if Yum China is unable or unwilling to satisfy its obligations under the Master License Agreement, or if the Master License Agreement is otherwise terminated, it could result in an interruption in the


operation of our brands that have been exclusively licensed to Yum China for use in mainland China. Such interruption could result incause a delay in, or loss of, royalty income to us, which would negatively impact our financial results.

Our international operations subject us to risks that could negatively affect our business.

A significant portion of our Concepts’ restaurants are operated in countries and territories outside of the U.S., including in emerging markets, and we intend to continue expansion of our international operations.  As a result, our business isand the businesses of our Concepts’ franchisees are increasingly exposed to risks inherent in international operations.  These risks, which can vary substantially by country, include political, financial or social instability or conditions, corruption, anti-American sentiment and social and ethnic unrest, as well as changes in economic conditions (including consumer spending, unemployment levels and wage and commodity inflation), the regulatory environment (including the risks of operating in developing or emerging markets in which there are significant uncertainties regarding the interpretation and enforceability of legal requirements and the enforceability of contract rights and intellectual property rights), income and non-income based tax rates and laws, the impact of import restrictions or controls, sanctions, foreign exchange control regimes including restrictions on currency conversion, natural disasters, the impact of labor costs and conditions, consumer preferences and the laws and policies that govern foreign investment in countries where our Concepts' restaurants are operated. For example, we have been subject to a regulatory enforcement action in India alleging violation of foreign exchange laws for failure to satisfy conditions of certain operating approvals, such as minimum investment and store build requirements as well as limitations on the remittance of fees outside of the country (See Note 19). In addition, we and our franchisees do business in jurisdictions that may be subject to trade or economic sanction regimes.regimes and such sanctions could be expanded. Any failure to comply with such sanction regimes or other similar laws or regulations could result in the assessment of damages, the imposition of penalties, suspension of business licenses, or a cessation of operations at our or our franchisees’ businesses, as well as damage to our and our Concepts’ brands’ images and reputations, all of which could harm our profitability.

Foreign currency risks and foreign exchange controls could adversely affect our financial results.

Our results of operations and the value of our foreign assets are affected by fluctuations in currency exchange rates, which may adversely affect reported earnings.  More specifically, an increase in the value of the U.S. dollar relative to other currencies, such as the Chinese Renminbi (“RMB”), Australian Dollar, the British Pound and the Euro, as well as currencies in certain other markets, such as the Malaysian Ringgit and Russian Ruble, could have an adverse effect on our reported earnings. There can be no assurance as to the future effect of any such changes on our results of operations, financial condition or cash flows. In addition, the Chinese government restrictsgovernments in certain countries where we operate, including China, restrict the convertibilityconversion of RMBlocal currency into foreign currencies and, in certain cases, the remittance of currency out of China.the country. Yum China’s income is almost exclusively derived from the earnings of its Chinese subsidiaries, with substantially all revenues of its Chinese subsidiaries denominated in RMB. Any significant fluctuation in the value of the RMB could materially impact the U.S. dollar value of royalty payments made to us by Yum China, which could result in lower revenues. In addition, restrictions on the conversion of RMB to U.S. dollars or further restrictions on the remittance of currency out of China could result in delays in the remittance of Yum China’s license fee,royalty, which could impact our liquidity.

Failure to protect the integrity and security of personal information of our customers and employees could result in substantial costs, expose us to litigation and damage our reputation.

We receive and maintain certain personal, financial and other information about our customers, employees, vendors and franchisees. In addition, our vendors and/or franchisees receive and maintain certain personal, financial and other information about our employees and customers. The use and handling of this information is regulated by evolving and increasingly demanding laws and regulations in various jurisdictions, as well as by certain third-party contracts. We have experienced cyber- attacks and security breaches from time to time. If our security and information systems are compromised as a result of data corruption or loss, cyber-attack or a network security incident or if our employees, franchisees or vendors fail to comply with these laws and regulations and this information is obtained by unauthorized persons or used inappropriately, it could result in liabilities and penalties and could damage our reputation, cause us to incur substantial costs and result in a loss of customer confidence, which could adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition. Additionally, we could be subject to litigation and government enforcement actions as a result of any such failure.

Further, data privacy is subject to frequently changing rules and regulations, which sometimes conflict among the various jurisdictions and countries where we, our Concepts and our Concepts’ franchisees do business. For example, the General Data Protection Regulation ("GDPR"), which was adopted by the European Union effective May 2018, requires companies to meet new requirements regarding the handling of personal data. In addition, the State of California enacted the California Consumer Privacy Act (the “CCPA”), which became effective January 2020 and requires companies that process information on California residents to, among other things, provide new disclosures and options to consumers about data collection, use and sharing practices.


Moreover, each of the GDPR and the CCPA confer a private right-of-action on certain individuals and associations. Our failure to adhere to or


successfully implement appropriate processes to adhere to the requirements of GDPR, CCPA and other evolving laws and regulations in this area could result in financial penalties, legal liability or impairment toand could damage our and our Concepts’ brands’ reputations.

Unreliable or inefficient restaurant or consumer-facing technology or the failure to successfully implement technology initiatives in the future could adversely impact operating results.

We and our Concepts’ franchisees rely heavily on information technology systems in the conduct of our business, some of which are managed, hosted, provided and/or used by third parties, including, for example, point-of-sale processing in our restaurants, management of our supply chain, and various other processes and procedures. These systems are subject to damage, interruption or failure due to theft, fire, power outages, telecommunications failure, computer viruses, security breaches, malicious cyber-attacks or other catastrophic events. Certain technology systems may also be unreliable or inefficient, and technology vendors may limit or terminate product support and maintenance, which could impact the reliability of critical systems operations. If our or our Concepts' franchisees' information technology systems are damaged or fail to function properly, we may incur substantial costs to repair or replace them, and may experience loss of critical data and interruptions or delays in our ability to manage inventories or process transactions, which could result in lost sales, customer or employee dissatisfaction, or negative publicity that could negatively impact our reputation, results of operations and financial condition.

We and our Concepts’ franchisees rely on technology not only to efficiently operate our restaurants but also to drive the customer experience, sales growth and margin improvement. Execution of our growth strategy will be dependent on our initiatives to implement proprietary and third-party technology solutions and gather and leverage data to enhance restaurant operations and improve the customer experience. We may not be able recruit and retain qualified individuals for these efforts, and there is intense competition for qualified technology systems developers necessary to develop and implement new technologies for our growth initiatives, including increasing our digital relationships with customers. Our strategic technology initiatives may not be implemented in a timely manner or may not achieve the desired results. Even if we effectively implement and manage our technology initiatives, they may not result in sales growth or margin improvement. Additionally, implementing the evolving technology demands of the consumer may place a significant financial burden on us and our Concepts’ franchisees. Moreover, our failure to adequately invest in new technology or adapt to technological developments and industry trends, particularly with respect to digital commerce capabilities, could result in a loss of customers and related market share. If our Concepts’ digital commerce platforms do not meet customers’ expectations in terms of security, speed, attractiveness or ease of use, customers may be less inclined to return to such digital commerce platforms, which could negatively impact our business.

There are risks associated with our increasing dependence on digital commerce platforms to maintain and grow sales. Such platforms may experience disruptions, which could harm our ability to compete and conduct our business.

Customers are increasingly using e-commerce websites and apps, both domestically and internationally, like pizzahut.com, Pizza Hut, KFC and Taco Bell apps, as well as apps owned by third-party delivery aggregators such as Grubhub and third-party mobile payment processors, to order and pay for our Concepts’ products. As a result, our Concepts and our Concepts’ franchisees are increasingly reliant on digital ordering and payment as a sales channel. These digital ordering and payment platforms could be damaged or interrupted by power loss, technological failures, user errors, cyber-attacks, other forms of sabotage or acts of God. In particular, Pizza Hut relies on digital orders for a significant portion of its sales and could experience and has experienced interruptions of its digital ordering platforms, which limited or delayed customers’ ability to order through such platforms or made customers less inclined to return to such platforms. Any such limitation or delay would negatively impact Pizza Hut’s sales and customer experience and perception.

Yum China, our largest franchisee, utilizes third-party mobile payment apps such as Alipay and WeChat as a means through which to generate sales and process payments. Should customers become unable to access mobile payment apps in China, or should the relationship between Yum China and one or more third-party mobile payment processors become interrupted, our results of operations could be negatively impacted.

Our inability or failure to recognize, respond to and effectively manage the accelerated impact of social media could adversely impact our business.

In recent years, there has been a marked increase in the use of social media platforms, including blogs, chat platforms, social media websites, and other forms of Internet-based communications which allow individuals access to a broad audience of consumers and other interested persons. The rising popularity of social media and other consumer-oriented technologies has increased the speed and accessibility of information dissemination. Many social media platforms immediately publish the content their subscribers and participants post, often without filters or checks on accuracy of the content posted. Information posted on such


platforms at any time may be adverse to our interests and/or may be inaccurate. The dissemination of information via social mediaonline could harm our business, reputation, financial condition, and results of operations, regardless of the information’s accuracy. The damage may be immediate without affording us an opportunity for redress or correction.

In addition, social media is frequently used by our Concepts to communicate with their respective customers and the public in general. Failure by our Concepts to use social media effectively or appropriately, particularly as compared to our Concept’sConcepts’ respective competitors, could lead to a decline in brand value, customer visits and revenue. Other risks associated with the use of social media include improper disclosure of proprietary information, negative comments about our Concepts’ brands, exposure of personally identifiable information, fraud, hoaxes or malicious dissemination of false information. The inappropriate use of social media by our customers or employees could increase our costs, lead to litigation or result in negative publicity that could damage our reputation and adversely affect our results of operations.

Shortages or interruptions in the availability and delivery of food and other supplies may increase costs or reduce revenues.

The products sold by our Concepts and their franchisees are sourced from a wide variety of domestic and international suppliers although certain products have limited suppliers, which increases our reliance on those suppliers. We, along with our Concepts’ franchisees, are also dependent upon third parties to make frequent deliveries of food products and supplies that meet our specifications at competitive prices.  Shortages or interruptions in the supply of food items and other supplies to our Concepts’ restaurants have happened from time to time and could adversely affect the availability, quality and cost of items we use and the operations of our restaurants.   SuchFuture shortages or disruptions could be caused by inclement weather, natural disasters, increasedinaccurate forecasting of customer demand, problems in production or distribution, restrictions on imports or exports including due to trade disputes, the inability of vendors to obtain credit, political instability in the countries in which the suppliers and distributors are located, the financial instability of suppliers and distributors, suppliers’ or distributors’ failure to meet our standards or requirements, transitioning to new suppliers or distributors, product quality issues, inflation, other factors relating to the suppliers and distributors and the countries in which they are located, food safety warnings or advisories or the prospect of such pronouncements, product recalls, the cancellation of supply or distribution agreements or an inability to renew such arrangements or to find replacements on commercially reasonable terms, or other conditions beyond our control or the control of our Concepts’ franchisees.  

Moreover, the withdrawal of the United Kingdom from the European Union which occurred effective as of January 31, 2020, to be followed by a transition period which is scheduled to expire on December 31, 2020 (unless otherwise extended) in which the United Kingdom and the European Union will negotiate the terms of this withdrawal, may give to rise to economic, financial, legal, tax and trade uncertainties that may adversely impact us and could, depending on the terms negotiated during the transition period, result in the reimposition of customs and border controls, which in turn may result in shortages or interruptions in supply to our Concepts in the United Kingdom with consequences similar to those described above.

In addition, in the U.S., the Company, along with representatives of the Company’s KFC, Pizza Hut and Taco Bell franchisee groups, are members of Restaurant Supply Chain Solutions, LLC (“RSCS"), which is a third-party responsible for purchasing certain restaurant products and equipment.equipment, and McLane Foodservice, Inc. ("McLane") serves as the largest distributor for each of the Company’s Concepts in the U.S. Any failure or inability of our significant suppliers or distributors, including RSCS or McLane to perform its purchasing obligations could result in shortages or interruptions in the availability of food and other supplies.

A shortage or interruption in the availability of certain food products or supplies could increase costs and limit the availability of products critical to restaurant operations, which in turn could lead to restaurant closures and/or a decrease in sales.  In addition, failure by a key supplier or distributor for our Concepts and/or our Concepts’ franchisees to meet its service requirements could lead to a disruption of service or supply until a new supplier or distributor is engaged, and any disruption could have an adverse effect on our business.

We may not achieve our target development goals, aggressive development could cannibalize existing sales and new restaurants may not be profitable.

Our growth strategy depends on our and our franchisees’ ability to increase our net restaurant count in markets around the world, especially in emerging markets.  The successful developmentloss of new units depends in large part on the ability of our Concepts’ franchisees to open new restaurants and to operate these restaurants profitably.  We cannot guarantee that we,key personnel, or our Concepts’ franchisees, including Yum China, will be able to achieve our expansion goals or that new restaurants will be operated profitably.  Further, there is no assurance that any new restaurant will produce operating results similar to those of our existing restaurants.  Other risks that could impact our ability to increase the number of our restaurants include prevailing economic conditions and our, or our Concepts’ franchisees’, ability to obtain suitable restaurant locations, negotiate acceptable lease or purchase terms for the locations, obtain required permits and approvals in a timely manner, hire and train qualified restaurant crews and meet construction schedules.



Expansion into target markets could also be affected by our Concepts’ franchisees’ ability to obtain financing to construct and open new restaurants.  If it becomes more difficult or more expensive for our Concepts’ franchisees to obtain financing to develop new restaurants, the expected growth of our system could slow and our future revenues and operating cash flows could be adversely impacted.

In addition, the new restaurants could impact the sales of our Concepts’ existing restaurants nearby.  There can be no assurance that sales cannibalization will not occur or become more significant in the future as we increase our presence in existing markets.

Laborlabor shortages or difficulty finding qualified employees could slow our growth, harm our business and reduce our profitability.

RestaurantMuch of our future success depends on the continued availability and service of senior management personnel. The loss of any of our executive officers or other key senior management personnel could harm our business.

In addition, our restaurant operations are highly service-oriented and our success depends in part upon our and our Concepts’ franchisees’ ability to attract, retain and motivate a sufficient number of qualified employees, including franchisee management, restaurant managers and other crew members. The market for qualified employees in ourthe retail food industry is very competitive. Any future inability to recruit and retain qualified individuals may delay our planned use, development or deployment of technology or the planned openings of new restaurants by us and our Concepts’ franchisees and could adversely impact our Concepts’ existing restaurants. Any such delays, material increases in employee turnover rate in existing restaurants or widespread employee dissatisfactionwhich could have a material adverse effectimpact on our andthe operation of our Concepts’ franchisees’ business and results of operations.existing restaurants.



In addition, strikes, work slowdowns or other job actions may become more common in the U.S.common. In the event of a strike, work slowdown or other labor unrest, the ability to adequately staff our Concept’sConcepts’ restaurants could be impaired, which could result in reduced revenue and customer claims, and may distract our management from focusing on our business and strategic priorities.

Changes in labor and other operating costs could adversely affect our and our franchisees’ results of operations.

An increase in the costs of employee wages, benefits and insurance (including workers’ compensation, general liability, property and health) as well as other operating costs such as rent and energy costs could adversely affect our and our franchisees’ operating results.  Such increases could result from general economic or competitive conditions or from government imposition of higher minimum wages at the federal, state or from general economic or competitive conditions.local level. Moreover, there may be a long-term trend toward higher wages in developing markets Any increase in such operating expenses could adversely affect our and our Concepts’ franchisees’ profit margins. In addition, competition for qualified employees could also compel us or our Concepts’ franchisees to pay higher wages to attract or retain key crew members, which could result in higher labor costs and decreased profitability.

A broader standard for determining joint employer status may adversely affect our business operations and increase our liabilities resulting from actions by our Concepts’ franchisees.

In 2015, the National Labor Relations Board (the “NLRB”) adopted a new and broader standard for determining when two or more otherwise unrelated employers may be found to be a joint employer of the same employees under the National Labor Relations Act. In addition, the general counsel’s office of the NLRB has issued complaints naming McDonald’s Corporation as a joint employer of workers at its franchisees for alleged violations of the U.S. Fair Labor Standards Act. The NLRB’s proposed and evolving joint employer liability standard could cause us or our Concepts to be liable or held responsible for unfair labor practices, violations of wage and hour laws, and other violations and could also require our Concepts to conduct collective bargaining negotiations, regarding employees of our Concepts’ franchisees. Further, there is no assurance that we or our Concepts will not receive similar complaints as McDonald’s Corporation in the future, which could result in legal proceedings based on the actions of our Concepts’ franchisees. In such events, our operating expenses may increase as a result of required modifications to our business practices, increased litigation, governmental investigations or proceedings, administrative enforcement actions, fines and civil liability.

An increase in food prices may have an adverse impact on our and our Concepts’ franchisees’ profit margins.

Our and our Concepts’ franchisees’ businesses depend on reliable sources of large quantities of raw materials such as proteinproteins (including poultry, pork, beef and seafood), cheese, oil, flour and vegetables (including potatoes and lettuce). Raw materials purchased for use in our Concepts’ restaurants are subject to price volatility caused by any fluctuation in aggregate supply and demand, or other external conditions, such as weather conditions, or natural events or disasters that affect expected harvests of such raw materials.materials, taxes and tariffs (including as a result of trade disputes), industry demand, food safety concerns, product recalls, governmental regulation and other factors, all of which are beyond our control and in many instances are unpredictable. As a result, the historical prices of raw materials used in the operation of our Concepts’ restaurants have fluctuated. We cannot assure you that we or our Concepts’ franchisees will continue to be able to purchase raw materials at reasonable prices, or that the cost of raw materials prices will remain stable in the future. In addition, a significant increase in gasoline prices could result in the imposition of fuel surcharges by our distributors.

Because we and our Concepts’ franchisees provide competitively priced food, we may not have the ability to pass through to our customers the full amount of any commodity price increases. If we and our Concepts’ franchisees are unable to manage the cost


of raw materials or to increase the prices of products proportionately, it may have an adverse impact on our and our franchisees’ profit margins.margins may be adversely impacted.

Our Concepts’ brands may be limitedharmed or diluted through franchisee and third-party activity.

Although we monitor and regulate franchisee activities through our Concepts’ franchise agreements, franchisees or other third parties may refer to or make statements about our Concepts’ brands that do not make proper use of our trademarks or required designations, that improperly alter trademarks or branding, or that are critical of our Concepts’ brands or place our Concepts’ brands in a context that may tarnish their reputation. This may result in dilution of, or harm to, our intellectual property or the value of our Concept’sConcepts’ brands.

Franchisee noncompliance with the terms and conditions of our franchise agreements may reduce the overall goodwill of our Concepts’ brands, whether through the failure to meet health and safety standards, engage in quality control or maintain product consistency, or through the participation in improper or objectionable business practices. Moreover, unauthorized third parties, including our Concepts’ current and former franchisees, may use our intellectual property to trade on the goodwill of our Concepts’ brands, resulting in consumer confusion or brand dilution. Any reduction of our Concepts’ brands’ goodwill, consumer confusion, or brand dilution is likely to impact sales, and could materially and adversely impact our business and results of operations.

Our success depends substantially on our corporate reputation and on the value and perception of our brands.

Our success depends in large part upon our ability and our Concepts’ franchisees’ ability to maintain and enhance the value of our brands and our customers’ loyalty to our brands.  Brand value is based in part on consumer perceptions on a variety of subjective qualities. BusinessThose perceptions are affected by a variety of factors, including the nutritional content and preparation of our food, the ingredients we use, and the manner in which we source the commodities we use. Consumer acceptance of our offerings is subject to change for a variety of reasons, and some changes can occur rapidly. For example, nutritional, health and other scientific studies and conclusions, which constantly evolve and may have contradictory implications, drive popular opinion, litigation and regulation (including initiatives intended to drive consumer behavior) in ways that may affect perceptions of our Concepts’ brands generally or relative to available alternatives. In addition, business incidents, whether isolated or recurring, and whether originating from us, our Concepts’ restaurants, franchisees, competitors, governments, suppliers or distributors, can significantly reduce brand value


and consumer trust, particularly if the incidents receive considerable publicity or result in litigation.litigation or investigations.  For example, our Concepts’ brands could be damaged by claims or perceptions about the quality or safety of our products or the quality or reputation of our suppliers, distributors or franchisees or that we, our Concepts’ franchisees or other business partners are acting in an unethical, illegal, racially-biased or socially irresponsible manner, regardless of whether such claims or perceptions are true. Similarly, entities in our supply chain may engage in conduct, including alleged human rights abuses or environmental wrongdoing, and any such conduct could damage our or our Concepts’ brands’ reputations. Any such incidents (even if resulting from actions of a competitor or franchisee) could cause a decline directly or indirectly in consumer confidence in, or the perception of, our Concepts’ brands and/or our products and reduce consumer demand for our products, which would likely result in lower revenues and profits. Additionally, our corporate reputation could suffer from a real or perceived failure of corporate governance or misconduct by a companyCompany officer, or an employee or representative of us or a franchisee.

We could be party to litigation that could adversely affect us by increasing our expenses, diverting management attention or subjecting us to significant monetary damages and other remedies.

We are regularly involved in legal proceedings, which include regulatory claims or disputes, consumer, personal injury, claims from franchisees employment, real estate related, tort, intellectual property, breach of contract, securities, derivative and other litigation (seelitigation. See the discussion of Legal Proceedingslegal proceedings in Note 2019 to the consolidated financial statementsConsolidated Financial Statements included in Item 8 of this Form 10-K).10-K. Plaintiffs in these types of lawsuits often seek recovery of very large or indeterminate amounts, lawsuits are subject to inherent uncertainties (some of which are beyond the Company’s control), and the magnitude of the potential loss relating to such lawsuits may not be accurately estimated.  Regardlessunfavorable rulings or developments could occur. Moreover, regardless of whether any such claims have merit, or whether we are ultimately held liable or settle, such litigation may be expensive to defend, and may divert resources and management attention away from our operations, and may negatively impact reported earnings.our results of operations.  With respect to insured claims, a judgment for monetary damages in excess of any insurance coverage could adversely affect our financial condition or results of operations.  AnyMoreover, any adverse publicity resulting from these allegations may also adversely affect our reputation,Concepts’ reputations, which in turn could adversely affect our results of operations.

In addition, the restaurant industry around the world has been subject to claims that relate to the nutritional content of food products, as well as claims that the menus and practices of restaurant chains have led to customer health issues, including weight gain and other adverse effects. These concerns could lead to an increase in the regulation of the content or marketing of our products. We may also be subject to such claims in the future and, even if we are not, publicity about these matters (particularly directed at the quick service and fast-casual segments of the retail food industry) may harm our reputationConcepts’ reputations and adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations. Moreover, these could lead to an increase in the regulation of the content or marketing of our products, including legislation or regulation seeking to tax and/or regulate high-fat foods, foods with high sugar and salt content, or foods otherwise deemed to be “unhealthy,” which could increase costs of compliance and remediation to us and our franchisees.

Changes in, or noncompliance with, governmental regulations may adversely affect our business operations, growth prospects or financial condition.

OurThe Company, and our Concepts and their franchisees, are subject to numerous laws and regulations around the world. These laws change regularly and are increasingly complex. For example, we are subject to:



The Americans with Disabilities Act in the U.S. and similar state laws that give civil rights protections to individuals with disabilities in the context of employment, public accommodations and other areas.
The U.S. Fair Labor Standards Act, which governs matters such as minimum wages, overtime and other working conditions, as well as family leave mandates and a variety of similar state laws that govern these and other employment law matters.
Laws and regulations in government-mandated health care benefits such as the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act.Act in the U.S.
Laws and regulations relating to nutritional content, nutritional labeling, product safety, product marketing and menu labeling.
Laws relating to state and local licensing.
Laws relating to the relationship between franchisors and franchisees.
Laws and regulations relating to health, sanitation, food, workplace safety, child labor, including laws prohibitingregulating the use of certain “hazardous equipment” by employees younger than the age of 18 years of age,, building and zoning, and fire safety and prevention.
Laws and regulations relating to union organizing rights and activities.
Laws relating to information security, privacy (including the European Union's GDPR and California's CCPA), cashless payments, and consumer protection.
Laws relating to currency conversion or exchange.
Laws relating to international trade and sanctions.
Tax laws and regulations.


Anti-bribery and anti-corruption laws.
Environmental laws and regulations.
Federal and state immigration laws and regulations in the U.S.

Compliance with new or existing laws and regulations could impact our or our Concepts’ franchisees’ operations. The compliance costs associated with these laws and regulations could be substantial. In addition, if any governmental authority were to adopt and implement a broader standard for determining when two or more otherwise unrelated employers may be found to be a joint employer of the same employees under laws such as the National Labor Relations Act in a manner that is applied generally to franchise relationships (which broader standards in the past have been adopted by U.S. governmental agencies such as the National Labor Relations Board), this could cause us or our Concepts to be liable or held responsible for unfair labor practices and other violations and could subject our Concepts to other liabilities, and/or require our Concepts to conduct collective bargaining negotiations, regarding employees of totally separate, independent employers, most notably our Concepts’ franchisees. Further, a recently-enacted law in California sets out an employment classification test that established a new standard for determining employee or independent contractor status. This law and any similar laws enacted at the federal, state or local level, could increase our and our franchisees’ labor costs and decrease profitability or could cause our franchisees to be deemed employees of our Concepts.

Any failure or alleged failure to comply with theseapplicable laws or regulations could adversely affect our reputation, international expansion efforts, growth prospects and financial results or result in, among other things, litigation, revocation of required licenses, internal investigations, governmental investigations or proceedings, administrative enforcement actions, fines and civil and criminal liability. Publicity relating to any such noncompliance could also harm our reputationConcepts’ reputations and adversely affect our revenues.

Additionally, we are working to manage the risks and costs to us, our franchisees and our supply chain of the effects of climate change, greenhouse gases, and diminishing energy and water resources. These risks include the increased public focus, including by governmental and nongovernmental organizations, on these and other environmental sustainability matters, such as packaging and waste, animal health and welfare, deforestation and land use. These risks also include the increased pressure to make commitments, set targets, or establish additional goals and take actions to meet them. These risks could expose us to market, operational, reputational and execution costs or risks.

Failure to comply with anti-bribery or anti-corruption laws could adversely affect our business operations.

The U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, the UK Bribery Act and other similar applicable laws prohibiting bribery of government officials and other corrupt practices are the subject of increasing emphasis and enforcement around the world. Although we have implemented policies and procedures designed to promote compliance with these laws, thereThere can be no assurance that our employees, contractors, agents or other third parties will not take actions in violation of our policies or applicable law, particularly as we expand our operations in emerging markets and elsewhere. Any such violations or suspected violations could subject us to civil or criminal penalties, including substantial fines and significant investigation costs, and could also materially damage our reputation, brands, international expansion efforts and growth prospects, business and operating results. Publicity relating to any noncompliance or alleged noncompliance could also harm our reputationConcepts’ reputations and adversely affect our revenues and results of operations.

Tax matters, including changes in tax rates or laws, disagreements with taxing authorities, and imposition of new taxes and our restructurings could impact our results of operations and financial condition.

A significant percentage of our income is earned outside the U.S. and currently taxed at lower rates than the U.S. statutory rates.  However, if the cash generated by our U.S. business is not sufficient to meet our need for cash in the U.S., we may need to repatriate a greater portion of our international earnings to the U.S. in the future. We are required to record U.S. income tax expense in our financial statements at the point in time when our management determines that we no longer have the ability and intent to indefinitely postpone tax consequences related to those international earnings. This could cause our worldwide effective tax rate to increase materially.

We are subject to income taxes as well as non-income based taxes, such as payroll, sales, use, value-added, net worth, property, withholding and franchise taxes in both the U.S. and various foreign jurisdictions. We are also subject to ongoing and/or regular reviews, examinations and audits by the U.S. Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) and other taxing authorities with respect to such income and non-income based taxes inside and outside of the U.S. Our accruals for tax liabilities are based on past experience, interpretations of applicable law, and judgments about potential actions by tax authorities, but such accruals require significant judgment which may be incorrect and may result in payments greater than the amounts accrued. If the IRS or another taxing authority disagrees with our tax positions, we could face additional tax liabilities, including interest and penalties.  Payment of such additional amounts upon final settlement or adjudication of any disputes could have a material impact on our results of operations and financial position.

In addition, we are directly and indirectly affected by new tax legislationlaws and regulation and the interpretation of tax laws and regulations worldwide. Changes in legislation,laws, regulation or interpretation of existing laws and regulations in the U.S. and other


jurisdictions where we are subject to taxation could increase our taxes and have an adverse effect on our operating results of operations and financial condition. Changes in tax laws may arise as a result of tax policy guidance issued by the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (“OECD”), a coalition of member nations including the United States. The OECD guidance, referred to as the Base Erosion and Profit Shifting (“BEPS”) Action Plan, does not have the force of law, but certain countries may enact tax legislation,


modify tax treaties, and/or increase audit scrutiny based on the BEPS guidance. To the extent BEPS principles are adopted by major jurisdictions in which we operate, it could increase our taxes and have a material adverse impact on our results of operations and financial position. We have in the past and may in the future adapt our entity and operating structure in response to and in compliance with changes in tax laws, regulations, or interpretation of existing laws and regulations. Such restructurings could result in material incremental tax costs associated with restructuring transactions or operations of the structure. In addition, public perception that we are not paying a sufficient amount of taxes could damage our Concepts’ reputations, which could harm our profitability.

The Yum China spin-off and certain related transactions could result in substantial U.S. tax liability.

We received opinions of outside counsel substantially to the effect that, for U.S. federal income tax purposes, the Yum China spin-off and certain related transactions qualifyqualified as generally tax-free under Sections 355 and 361 of the U.S. Internal Revenue Code. The opinions relied on various facts and assumptions, as well as certain representations as to factual matters and undertakings (including with respect to future conduct) made by Yum China and us. If any of these facts, assumptions, representations or undertakings are incorrect or not satisfied, we may not be able to rely on these opinions of outside counsel. Accordingly, notwithstanding receipt of the opinions of outside counsel, the conclusions reached in the tax opinions may be challenged by the IRS. Because the opinions are not binding on the IRS or the courts, there can be no assurance that the IRS or the courts will not prevail in any such challenge.

If, notwithstanding receipt of any opinion, the IRS were to conclude that the Yum China spin-off was taxable, in general, we would recognize taxable gain as if we had sold the Yum China common stock in a taxable sale for its fair market value. In addition, each U.S. holder of our Common Stock who received shares of Yum China common stock in connection with the spin-off transaction would generally be treated as having received a taxable distribution of property in an amount equal to the fair market value of the shares of Yum China common stock received. That distribution would be taxable to each such U.S. stockholder as a dividend to the extent of our current and accumulated earnings and profits. For each such U.S. stockholder, any amount that exceeded our earnings and profits would be treated first as a non-taxable return of capital to the extent of such stockholder’s tax basis in our shares of Common Stock with any remaining amount being taxed as a capital gain.

The Yum China spin-off may be subject to China indirect transfer tax.

In February 2015, the Chinese State Administration of Taxation (“SAT”) issued the Bulletin on Several Issues of Enterprise Income Tax on Income Arising from Indirect Transfers of Property by Non-resident Enterprises (“Bulletin 7”). Pursuant to Bulletin 7, an “indirect transfer” of Chinese taxable assets, including equity interests in a China resident enterprise (“Chinese interests”), by a non-resident enterprise, may be recharacterized and treated as a direct transfer of Chinese taxable assets, if such arrangement does not have reasonable commercial purpose and the transferor has avoided payment of Chinese enterprise income tax. Using general anti-tax avoidance provisions, the SAT may treat an indirect transfer as a direct transfer of Chinese interests if the transfer has avoided Chinese tax by way of an arrangement without reasonable commercial purpose. As a result, gains derived from such indirect transfer may be subject to Chinese enterprise income tax, and the transferee or other person who is obligated to pay for the transfer would be obligated to withhold the applicable taxes, currently at a rate of up to 10% of the capital gain in the case of an indirect transfer of equity interests in a China resident enterprise.

We evaluated the potential applicability of Bulletin 7 in connection with the Separation in the form of a tax free restructuring and believe it is more likely than not that Bulletin 7 does not apply. We believe that the restructuring has reasonable commercial purpose.

However, given how recently Bulletin 7 was promulgated, there are significant uncertainties regarding what constitutes a reasonable commercial purpose, how the safe harbor provisions for group restructurings are to be interpreted and how the Chinese tax authorities will ultimately view the spin-off. As a result, our position could be challenged by the Chinese tax authorities resulting in a tax at a rate of 10% assessed on the difference between the fair market value and the tax basis of Yum China. As our tax basis in Yum China was minimal, the amount of such a tax could be significant and have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and our financial condition.

Failure to protect our service marks or other intellectual property could harm our business.

We regard our Yum®, KFC®, Pizza Hut®, and Taco Bell® service marks, and other service marks and trademarks related to our restaurant businesses, as having significant value and being important to our marketing efforts. We rely on a combination of protections provided by contracts, copyrights, patents, trademarks, service marks and other common law rights, such as trade secret and unfair competition laws, to protect our restaurants and services from infringement. We have registered certain trademarks and service marks in the U.S. and foreign jurisdictions. However, from time to time we become aware of names and marks identical or confusingly similar to our service marks being used by other persons. Although our policy is to oppose any such infringement,


further or unknown unauthorized uses or other misappropriation of our trademarks or service marks could diminish the value of our brands and adversely affect our business. In addition, effective intellectual property protection may not be available in every country in which our Concepts have, or intend tomay in the future open or franchise, a restaurant.restaurant, and the laws of some foreign countries do not protect intellectual property rights to the same extent as the laws of the United States. There can be no assurance that thesethe steps we have taken to protect our intellectual property or the legal protections which may be available will be adequate, and defending or enforcing our service marks and other intellectual property could result in the expenditure of


significant resources.resources or result in significant harm to our business, reputation, financial condition, and results of operations. We may also face claims of infringement that could interfere with the use of the proprietary know-how, concepts, recipes, or trade secrets used in our business. Defending against such claims may be costly, and we may be prohibited from using such proprietary information in the future or forced to pay damages, royalties, or other fees for using such proprietary information, any of which could negatively affect our business, reputation, financial condition, and results of operations.

Our business may be adversely impacted by changes in consumer discretionary spending and general economic conditions.

Purchases atOur and our restaurants are discretionary for consumers and, therefore, our results of operations are susceptible to economic slowdowns and recessions. Ourfranchisees' results of operations are dependent upon discretionary spending by consumers, which may be affected by general economic conditions globally or in one or more of the markets we serve.serve, and are susceptible to economic slowdowns and recessions.  Some of the factors that impact discretionary consumer spending include unemployment and underemployment rates, fluctuations in the level of disposable income, the price of gasoline and other inflationary pressures, stock market performance and changes in the level of consumer confidence.  These and other macroeconomic factors could have an adverse effect on our or our franchisees’ sales, profitability or development plans, which could harm our financial condition and operating results.

The retail food industry in which we operate is highly competitive.

TheOur Concept restaurants compete with international, national and regional restaurant chains as well as locally-owned restaurants, and the retail food industry in which weour Concepts operate is highly competitive with respect to price and quality of food products, new product development, digital engagement, advertising levels and promotional initiatives (including the frequent use by our competitors of price discounting, such as through value meal menu options, coupons and other methods), customer service, reputation, restaurant location, and attractiveness and maintenance of properties. In addition, our Concepts compete within the retail food industry for management and hourly personnel, suitable real estate sites, and qualified franchisees. If consumer or dietary preferences change, if our marketing efforts and/or launch of new products are unsuccessful, or if our Concepts’ restaurants are unable to compete successfully with other retail food outlets in new and existing markets, our businessand our franchisees' businesses could be adversely affected.   We also face growing competition as a result of convergence in grocery, convenience, deli and restaurant services, including the offering by the grocery industry of convenient meals, including pizzas and entrees with side dishes.  Competition from delivery aggregators and other food delivery services has also increased in recent years, particularly in urbanized areas.areas, and is expected to continue to increase. Increased competition could have an adverse effect on our sales, profitability or development plans, which could harm our or our franchisees’ financial condition and operating results.

We may not realize the anticipated benefits from past or potential future acquisitions, investments or other strategic transactions.

From time to time we evaluate and may complete mergers, acquisitions, divestitures, joint ventures, strategic partnerships, minority investments (which may include minority investments in third parties, such as franchisees or master franchisees) and other strategic transactions, including our pending acquisition of The Habit Restaurants, Inc. (in respect of which a definitive agreement was signed in January 2020), our strategic alliance with Telepizza Group S.A. effectuated in December 2018, our acquisition of QuikOrder, LLC completed in December 2018 and our minority investment in Grubhub, Inc. completed in April 2018. While we currently contemplate that the acquisition of The Habit Restaurants, Inc. will be completed by the end of the first quarter of 2020, there is no guarantee that this acquisition will be completed on this time frame or at all.

Past and potential future strategic transactions may involve various inherent risks, including, without limitation:

expenses, delays or difficulties in integrating acquired companies, joint venture operations, strategic partnerships or investments into our organization, including the failure to realize expected synergies and/or the inability to retain key personnel;

diversion of management’s attention from other initiatives and/or day-to-day operations to effectively execute our growth strategy;

inability to generate sufficient revenue, profit, and cash flow from acquired companies, joint ventures, strategic partnerships or investments;



the possibility that we have acquired substantial contingent or unanticipated liabilities in connection with acquisitions or other strategic transactions; and

the possibility that investments we have made may decline significantly in value.

Past and potential future strategic transactions may not ultimately create value for us and may harm our reputation and materially adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations. In addition, we account for certain investments, including our investment in Grubhub, on a mark-to-market basis and, as a result, changes in the fair value of these investments impact our reported results. Changes in market prices for equity securities are unpredictable, and our investment in Grubhub has caused, and could continue to cause, significant fluctuations in our results of operations.

Our substantial indebtedness makes us more sensitive to adverse economic conditions, may limit our ability to plan for or respond to significant changes in our business, and requires a significant amount of cash to service our debt payment obligations that we may be unable to generate or obtain.

In 2016, we increasedAs of December 31, 2019, our indebtedness fromtotal outstanding short-term borrowings and long-term debt was approximately $4 billion to approximately $9$10.6 billion. The proceeds from the debt were primarily used to return capital to shareholders through share repurchases and dividends. Subject to the limits contained in the agreements governing our outstanding indebtedness, we may be able to incur additional debt from time to time, which would intensifyincrease the risks related to our high level of indebtedness.

Specifically, our high level of indebtedness could have important potential consequences, including, but not limited to:
increasing our vulnerability to, and reducing our flexibility to plan for and respond to, adverse economic and industry conditions and changes in our business and the competitive environment;
requiring the dedication of a substantial portion of our cash flow from operations to the payment of principal of, and interest on, indebtedness, thereby reducing the availability of such cash flow to fund working capital, capital expenditures, acquisitions, dividends, share repurchases or other corporate purposes;
increasing our vulnerability to a further downgrade of our credit rating, which could adversely affect our cost of funds, liquidity and access to capital markets;
restricting us from making strategic acquisitions or causing us to make non-strategic divestitures;
placing us at a disadvantage compared to other less leveraged competitors or competitors with comparable debt at more favorable interest rates;
increasing our exposure to the risk of increased interest rates insofar as current and future borrowings are subject to variable rates of interest;
increasing our exposure to the risk of discontinuance, replacement or modification of certain reference rates, including LIBOR, which are used to calculate applicable interest rates of our indebtedness and certain derivative instruments that hedge interest rate risk;
making it more difficult for us to repay, refinance or satisfy our obligations with respect to our debt;
limiting our ability to borrow additional funds in the future and increasing the cost of any such borrowing;
imposing restrictive covenants on our operations as the result of the terms of our indebtedness, which, if not complied with, could result in an event of default, which in turn, if not cured or waived, could result in the acceleration of the applicable debt, and may result in the acceleration of any other debt to which a cross-acceleration or cross-default provision applies; and
increasing our exposure to risks related to fluctuations in foreign currency as we earn profits in a variety of currencies around the world and our debt is primarily denominated in U.S. dollars.

There is no assurance that we will generate cash flow from operations or that future debt or equity financings will be available to us to enable us to pay our indebtedness or to fund other liquidity needs. If our business does not generate sufficient cash flow from operation in the amounts projected or at all,operations or if future borrowings are not available to us in amounts sufficient to pay our


indebtedness or to fund other liquidity needs, our financial condition and results of operations may be adversely affected. As a result, we may need to refinance all or a portion of our indebtedness on or before maturity. There is no assurance that we will be able to refinance any of our indebtedness on favorable terms, or at all. Any inability to generate sufficient cash flow or refinance our indebtedness on favorable terms could have a material adverse effect on our business and financial condition.

Item 1B.Unresolved Staff Comments.

The Company has received no written comments regarding its periodic or current reports from the staff of the Securities and Exchange Commission that were issued 180 days or more preceding the end of its 20162019 fiscal year and that remain unresolved.


Item 2.Properties.

As of year end 20162019, the Company’s Concepts owned approximately 860 units and leased land, building or both for approximately 2,000 units worldwide.337 restaurants worldwide in connection with the operation of our 913 Company-owned restaurants.  These unitsrestaurants are further detailed as follows:

The KFC Division owned approximately 260 units and leased land, building or both in approximately 1,165 units.for 73 restaurants.
The Pizza Hut Division owned approximately 70 units and leased land, building or both in approximately 480 units.for 5 restaurants.
The Taco Bell Division owned approximately 530 units and leased land, building or both for 259 restaurants.

The Company currently also owns land, building or both related to approximately 500 restaurants and leases land, building or both related to approximately 400 restaurants, not included in approximately 355 units.the property counts above, that it leases or subleases to franchisees, principally in the U.S., United Kingdom, Australia, Germany and France.

Company-owned restaurants in the U.S. with leases are generally leased for initial terms of 15 or 20 years and generally have renewal options; however, Pizza Hut delivery/carryout units in the U.S. generally are leased for significantly shorter initial terms with shorter renewal options.  Company-owned restaurants outside the U.S. with leases have initial lease terms and renewal options that vary by country. The Company currently has land, buildings or both related to approximately 700 units, not included in the property counts above, that it leases or subleases to franchisees, principally in the U.S., United Kingdom, Germany and France.

The KFC Division and Pizza Hut Division corporate headquarters and a KFC and Pizza Hut research facility in Plano, Texas are owned by Pizza Hut.  Taco Bell leases its corporate headquarters and research facility in Irvine, California. The YUM corporate headquarters and a KFC research facility in Louisville, Kentucky are owned by KFC.  Additional information about the Company’s properties is included in the Consolidated Financial Statements in Part II, Item 8.

The Company believes that its properties are generally in good operating condition and are suitable for the purposes for which they are being used.

Item 3.
Legal Proceedings.

The Company is subject to various lawsuits covering a variety of allegations. The Company believes that the ultimate liability, if any, in excess of amounts already provided for these matters in the Consolidated Financial Statements, is not likely to have a material adverse effect on the Company’s annual results of operations, financial condition or cash flows. Matters faced by the Company include, but are not limited to, claims from franchisees, suppliers, employees, customers, governments and others related to operational, foreign exchange, tax, franchise, contractual or employment issues as well as claims that the Company has infringed on third partythird-party intellectual property rights. In addition, the Company brings claims from time-to-time relating to infringement of, or challenges to, our intellectual property, including registered marks. Finally, as a publicly-traded company, disputes arise from time-to-time with our shareholders, including allegations that the Company breached federal securities laws or that officers and/or directors breached fiduciary duties. Descriptions of significant current specific claims and contingencies appear in Note 20,19, Contingencies, to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part II, Item 8, which is incorporated by reference into this item.




Item 4.Mine Safety Disclosures.

Not applicable.

Executive Officers of the Registrant.

The executive officers of the Company as of February 21, 2017,19, 2020, and their ages and current positions as of that date are as follows:

Greg Creed, 59, is Chief Executive Officer of YUM. He has served in this position since January 2015.  He served as Chief Executive Officer of Taco Bell Division from January 2014 to December 2014 and as Chief Executive Officer of Taco Bell U.S. from 2011 to December 2013. Prior to this position, Mr. Creed served as President and Chief Concept Officer of Taco Bell U.S., a position he held beginning in December 2006.

Roger EatonDavid Gibbs, 56, is Chief Executive Officer of KFC Division,YUM a position he has held since August 2015.January 2020. Prior to that, he served as President of KFC Divisionand Chief Operating Officer from August 2019 to December 2019, as President, Chief Financial Officer and Chief Operating Officer from January 20142019 to August 20152019 and as Chief Operations Officer of YUM from November 2011 to August 2015.  Prior to these positions, Mr. Eaton served as Chief Executive Officer of KFC U.S. and YUM Operational Excellence Officer from February 2011 to November 2011.

David Gibbs, 53, is President and Chief Financial Officer of YUM. He has served in this position sincefrom May 2016.2016 to December 2018. Prior to this position,these positions, he served as Chief Executive Officer of Pizza Hut Division from January 2015 to April 2016. From January 2014 to December 2014, Mr. Gibbs served as President of Pizza Hut U.S. Prior to this position, Mr. Gibbs served as President and Chief Financial Officer of Yum! Restaurants International, Inc. (“YRI”) from May 2012 through December 2013. Mr. Gibbs served as Chief Financial Officer of YRI from January 2011 to April 2012. He was Chief Financial Officer of Pizza Hut U.S. from September 2005 to December 2010.



Marc KesselmanScott Catlett,, 45, 43, is General Counsel, Corporate Secretary and Chief Government Affairs Officer of YUM. He has served as General Counsel and Corporate Secretary of YUMYUM. He has severed in this position since February 2016 andJuly 2018. Prior to serving as Chief Government Affairs Officer since November 2016.  Mr. Kesselman joined YUM from Dean Foods where he held the position of Executive Vice President, General Counsel Corporate Secretary & Government Affairs from January 2015 to January 2016.  Prior to this position, he worked at PepsiCo from January 2009 to January 2015, most recently servingserved as Senior Vice President and Deputy General Counsel of PepsiCo Americas FoodsYUM from November 2015 to June 2018. From September 2007 to October 2015 Mr. Catlett held various YUM positions including Vice President & Frito Lay North America. From May 2006 to December 2008 he served asAssociate General Counsel of the United States Department of Agriculture.Counsel.

Brian NiccolMark King,, 42, 60, is Chief Executive Officer of Taco Bell Division, a position he has held since January 2015.  From January 2014 to December 2014,August 2019. Before joining YUM, Mr. NiccolKing served as President, adidas Group North America from June 2014 to June 2018 and as Chief Executive Officer of Taco Bell Division. From May 2013TaylorMade-adidas Golf from 2003 to December 2013 Mr. Niccol2014.

Tony Lowings, 61, is Chief Executive Officer of KFC Division, a position he has held since January 2019. Prior to that, he served as President of Taco Bell U.S. Mr. Niccol served asand Chief Marketing and InnovationOperations Officer of Taco Bell U.S.KFC Division from October 2011August 2018 to April 2013.  PriorDecember 2018. From November 2016 to this position,July 2018 he served as Managing Director of Asia-Pacific and from February 2013 to October 2016 as Managing Director of KFC SOPAC (Australia and New Zealand). Mr. Lowings served in various positions including Chief Operations Officer of YRI and Managing Director of Latin America and the Caribbean for KFC, Pizza Hut and Taco Bell and General Manager of KFC and Pizza Hut U.S.in Australia and New Zealand from February 2011 to September 2011.  From September 2007January 2010 to January 2011 he was Chief Marketing Officer of Pizza Hut U.S.2013.

David Russell, 47,50, is Senior Vice President, Finance and Corporate Controller of YUM. He has served in this position since December 2012. He has been Vice President andas YUM's Corporate Controller since February 2011. Effective December 2012, his duties2011 and title were expanded to includeas Senior Vice President, Finance. FromFinance since February 2017. Prior to serving as Corporate Controller, Mr. Russell served in various positions at the Vice President level in the YUM Finance Department, including Controller-Designate from November 2010 to February 2011 Mr. Russell served asand Vice President, Controller-Designate.  FromAssistant Controller from January 2008 to November 2010, he served as Vice President and Assistant Controller.December 2010.

Tracy Skeans, 44,47, is Chief Transformation and People Officer of YUM. She has served as Chief People Officer since January 2016 and Chief Transformation Officer since November 2016. From January 2015 to December 2015, she was President of Pizza Hut International. Prior to this position, Ms. Skeans served as Chief People Officer of Pizza Hut Division from December 2013 to December 2014 and Chief People Officer of Pizza Hut U.S. from October 2011 to November 2013. From June 2006July 2009 to September 2011, she served as Director of Human Resources for Pizza Hut U.S and was on the Pizza Hut U.S. Finance team from September 2000 to June 2009.

Arthur Starrs, 43, is Chief Executive Officer of Pizza Hut Division, a position he has held since August 2019. He served as President of Pizza Hut U.S. from May 2016 to July 2019 and he served as General Manager and Chief Financial Officer of Pizza Hut U.S. from November 2013 to April 2016.

Christopher Turner, 45, is Chief Financial Officer of YUM, a position he has held since August 2019. Before joining YUM, he served as Senior Vice President and General Manager in PepsiCo’s retail and e-commerce businesses with Walmart in the U.S. and more than 25 countries and across PepsiCo’s brands from December 2017 to July 2019. Prior to leading PepsiCo’s Walmart business, he served in various positions including Senior Vice President of Transformation for PepsiCo’s Frito-Lay North America business from July 2017 to December 2017 and Senior Vice President of Strategy for Frito-Lay from February 2016 to June 2017. Prior to joining PepsiCo, he was a partner in the Dallas office of McKinsey & Company, a strategic management consulting firm.

Executive officers are elected by and serve at the discretion of the Board of Directors.

17



PART II

Item 5.Market for the Registrant’s Common Stock, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities.

Market Information and Dividend Policy

The Company’s Common Stock trades under the symbol YUM and is listed on the NYSE.  The following sets forth the high and low NYSE composite closing sale prices by quarter for the Company’s CommonNew York Stock and dividends per common share. On October 31, 2016 (the "Distribution Date"), we completed the spin-off of our China business (the "Separation") into an independent, publicly-traded company under the name Yum China Holdings, Inc.Exchange ("Yum China"NYSE").  On the Distribution Date we distributed to each of our shareholders of record as of the close of business on October 19, 2016 (the "Record Date"), one share of Yum China common stock for each share of our Common Stock held as of the Record Date. Stock prices prior to November 1, 2016, do not reflect any adjustment for the impact of the Separation.

2016
Quarter High Low 
Dividends
Declared
First $78.79
 $65.24
 $0.46
Second 84.19
 78.98
 0.46
Third 91.26
 79.33
 
Fourth (to October 31) 91.25
 85.36
 0.51
Fourth (from November 1) 64.74
 59.70
 0.30

2015
Quarter High Low 
Dividends
Declared
First $81.80
 $70.01
 $
Second 94.88
 78.29
 0.82
Third 92.75
 76.10
 
Fourth 83.42
 67.12
 0.92

On December 21, 2016, the Company declared its first dividend since the separation of its China business of $0.30 per share of Common Stock. The quarterly dividend was distributed February 3, 2017, to shareholders of record at the close of business on January 13, 2017. The Company currently targets an annual dividend payout ratio of approximately 45% to 50% of net income.

As of February 14, 2017,12, 2020, there were 52,54140,958 registered holders of record of the Company’s Common Stock.



In 2019, the Company declared and paid four cash dividends of $0.42 per share. Over the long term, the Company targets an annual dividend payout ratio of 45% to 50% of Net Income, before Special Items and excluding mark-to-market adjustments related to our investment in Grubhub common stock.

Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

The following table provides information as of December 31, 20162019, with respect to shares of Common Stock repurchased by the Company during the quarter then ended. Share prices for shares repurchased prior to November 1, 2016, do not reflect any adjustment for the impact of the Separation.

Fiscal Periods 
Total number
of shares
purchased
(thousands)
 
Average price
paid per share
 
Total number of shares
purchased as part of
publicly announced plans
or programs
(thousands)
 
Approximate dollar value
of shares that may yet be
purchased under the plans
or programs
(millions)
Period 10 7,458 $89.15
 7,458 $940
9/4/16 - 10/1/16        
Period 11 5,047 $89.15
 5,047 $490
10/2/16 - 10/29/16        
Period 12 3,511 $61.38
 3,511 $2,275
10/30/16 - 11/26/16        
Period 13 5,638 $63.84
 5,638 $1,915
11/27/16 - 12/31/16        
Total 21,654 $78.06
 21,654 $1,915
Fiscal Periods 
Total number
of shares
purchased
(thousands)
 
Average price
paid per share
 
Total number of shares
purchased as part of
publicly announced plans
or programs
(thousands)
 
Approximate dollar value
of shares that may yet be
purchased under the plans
or programs
(millions)
10/1/19 - 10/31/19 1,108 $110.34
 1,108 $507
11/1/19- 11/30/19 2,140 $98.63
 2,140 $2,296
12/1/19 - 12/31/19  $
  $2,000
Total 3,248   3,248 


On March 4, 2016,November 21, 2019, our Board of Directors authorized share repurchases through December 2016June 2021 of up to $500 million (excluding applicable transaction fees) of our outstanding Common Stock. On May 20, 2016, our Board of Directors authorized share repurchases through December 2016 of up to $4.2 billion (excluding applicable transaction fees) of our outstanding Common Stock. This authorization superseded all previous unutilized authorizations. On November 17, 2016, our Board of Directors authorized additional share repurchases through December 2017 of up to $2.0$2 billion (excluding applicable transaction fees) of our outstanding Common Stock. As of December 31, 2016,2019, we have remaining capacity to repurchase up to $1.9$2 billion of Common Stock under the November 2016this authorization. An August 2018 share repurchase authorization, with unutilized share repurchase capacity of $296 million, expired on December 31, 2019.





Stock Performance Graph

This graph compares the cumulative total return of our Common Stock to the cumulative total return of the S&P 500 Stock Index and the S&P 500 Consumer Discretionary Sector Index, a peer group that includes YUM, for the period from December 30, 201131, 2014 to December 30, 2016, the last trading day of our 2016 fiscal year.31, 2019. The graph assumes that the value of the investment in our Common Stock and each index was $100 at December 30, 2011,31, 2014 and that all cash dividends were reinvested. For the purpose of this graph, the distribution of 100% of the outstanding common stock of Yum China Holdings, Inc. (“Yum China”) to our stockholders, pursuant to which Yum China became an independent company, is treated as a non-taxable cash dividend of $24.51 per share, an amount equal to the opening price of Yum China common stock when it began trading on November 1, 2016, that was deemed reinvested in YUM Common Stock at the closing price on November 1, 2016.

stockperformancegraph.jpg
 12/30/2011 12/28/2012 12/27/2013 12/26/2014 12/24/2015 12/30/2016 12/31/2014 12/31/2015 12/30/2016 12/29/2017 12/31/2018 12/31/2019
YUM $100
 $112
 $130
 $131
 $136
 $167
 $100
 $103
 $127
 $166
 $190
 $212
S&P 500 $100
 $114
 $152
 $176
 $178
 $198
 $100
 $101
 $113
 $138
 $132
 $174
S&P Consumer Discretionary $100
 $121
 $175
 $194
 $214
 $227
 $100
 $110
 $117
 $144
 $145
 $185

Source of total return data: Bloomberg




Item 6.Selected Financial Data.
Selected Financial Data
YUM!Yum! Brands, Inc. and Subsidiaries
(in millions, except per share and unit amounts)


 Fiscal Year
 
2016(a)(f)
 
2015(a)
 
2014(a)
 
2013(a)
 
2012(a)(f)
Income Statement Data         
Revenues         
Company sales$4,200
 $4,356
 $4,503
 $4,384
 $5,036
Franchise and license fees and income2,166
 2,084
 2,084
 2,033
 1,940
Total6,366
 6,440
 6,587
 6,417
 6,976
Closures and impairment income (expenses)(14) (15) (18) (6) (28)
Refranchising gain (loss)(b)
141
 (23) 16
 95
 61
Operating Profit(c)
1,625
 1,402
 1,517
 1,530
 1,408
Interest expense, net(c)
307
 141
 143
 251
 157
Income before income taxes1,318
 1,261
 1,374
 1,279
 1,251
Income from continuing operations994
 936
 1,006
 922
 884
Income from discontinued operations, net of tax625
 357
 45
 169
 713
Net Income1,619
 1,293
 1,051
 1,091
 1,597
Basic earnings per common share from continuing operations2.52
 2.15
 2.27
 2.04
 1.91
Basic earnings per common share from discontinued operations1.59
 0.82
 0.10
 0.37
 1.55
Basic earnings per common share4.11
 2.97
 2.37
 2.41
 3.46
Diluted earnings per common share from continuing operations2.48
 2.11
 2.22
 2.00
 1.87
Diluted earnings per common share from discontinued operations1.56
 0.81
 0.10
 0.36
 1.51
Diluted earnings per common share4.04
 2.92
 2.32
 2.36
 3.38
Diluted earnings per common share from continuing operations excluding Special Items(c)
2.45
 2.33
 2.20
 2.04
 1.90
Cash Flow Data         
Provided by operating activities$1,204
 $1,213
 $1,217
 $1,289
 $1,373
Capital spending422
 461
 508
 481
 444
Proceeds from refranchising of restaurants346
 219
 83
 250
 337
Repurchase shares of Common Stock5,402
 1,200
 820
 770
 965
Dividends paid on Common Stock744
 730
 669
 615
 544
Balance Sheet Data         
Total assets$5,478
 $4,916
 $5,132
 $4,975
 $5,262
Long-term debt9,061
 3,007
 3,042
 2,888
 2,905
Total debt9,127
 3,928
 3,308
 2,958
 2,914
Other Data         
Number of stores at year end         
 Company2,859
 3,159
 3,247
 3,071
 2,997
 Franchise40,758
 39,263
 37,984
 36,746
 35,461
 System43,617
 42,422
 41,231
 39,817
 38,458
KFC Division system sales growth(d)
         
Reported2% (3)% 1% (2)% 6%
Local currency(e)
7% 5 % 4%  % 8%
Pizza Hut Division system sales growth(d)
         
Reported% (1)% 1% 3 % 5%
Local currency(e)
2% 3 % 2% 4 % 7%
Taco Bell Division system sales growth(d)
         
Reported6% 8 % 4% 4 % 7%
Local currency(e)
6% 8 % 4% 4 % 9%
Shares outstanding at year end355
 420
 434
 443
 451
Cash dividends declared per Common Share$1.73
 $1.74
 $1.56
 $1.41
 $1.24
Market price per share at year end(g)
$63.33
 $74.00
 $73.14
 $73.87
 $64.72
  
 2019 2018 2017 2016 2015
Income Statement Data         
Revenues         
Company sales$1,546
 $2,000
 $3,572
 $4,189
 $4,336
Franchise and property revenues2,660
 2,482
 2,306
 2,167
 2,082
Franchise contributions for advertising and other services1,391
 1,206
 
 
 
Total5,597
 5,688
 5,878
 6,356
 6,418
Refranchising (gain) loss(37) (540) (1,083) (163) 23
Operating Profit1,930
 2,296
 2,761
 1,682
 1,434
Other pension (income) expense4
 14
 47
 32
 40
Interest expense, net486
 452
 445
 307
 141
Income from continuing operations before income taxes1,373
 1,839
 2,274
 1,345
 1,253
Income from continuing operations1,294
 1,542
 1,340
 1,018
 926
Income from discontinued operations, net of taxN/A
 N/A
 N/A
 625
 357
Net Income1,294
 1,542
 1,340
 1,643
 1,283
Basic earnings per share from continuing operations4.23
 4.80
 3.86
 2.58
 2.13
Basic earnings per share from discontinued operationsN/A
 N/A
 N/A
 1.59
 0.82
Basic earnings per share4.23
 4.80
 3.86
 4.17
 2.95
Diluted earnings per share from continuing operations4.14
 4.69
 3.77
 2.54
 2.09
Diluted earnings per share from discontinued operationsN/A
 N/A
 N/A
 1.56
 0.81
Diluted earnings per share4.14
 4.69
 3.77
 4.10
 2.90
Diluted earnings per share from continuing operations excluding Special Items3.55
 3.17
 2.96
 2.46
 2.31
Cash Flow Data         
Provided by operating activities$1,315
 $1,176
 $1,030
 $1,248
 $1,260
Capital spending196
 234
 318
 427
 442
Proceeds from refranchising of restaurants110
 825
 1,773
 370
 213
Repurchase shares of Common Stock815
 2,390
 1,960
 5,403
 1,200
Dividends paid on Common Stock511
 462
 416
 744
 730
Balance Sheet Data         
Total assets$5,231
 $4,130
 $5,311
 $5,453
 $4,939
Long-term debt10,131
 9,751
 9,429
 9,059
 2,988
Total debt10,562
 10,072
 9,804
 9,125
 3,908
Other Data         
Number of units at year end         
 Franchise49,257
 47,268
 43,603
 40,834
 39,320
 Company913
 856
 1,481
 2,841
 3,163
 System50,170
 48,124
 45,084
 43,675
 42,483
System net new unit growth4% 7% 3% 3% 3%
System and same-store sales         
KFC Division System sales
$27,900
 $26,239
 $24,515
 $23,242
 $22,628
System sales growth (decline)6% 7% 5% 3% (3)%
System sales growth, ex FX and 53rd week9% 6% 6% 6% 5%
Same-store sales growth4% 2% 3% 2% 1%
Pizza Hut Division System sales
$12,900
 $12,212
 $12,034
 $12,019
 $11,999
System sales growth (decline)6% 1% % % (1)%
System sales growth, ex FX and 53rd week7% 1% 2% 1% 3%
Same-store sales growth (decline)% % % (2)% %
Taco Bell Division System sales
$11,784
 $10,786
 $10,145
 $9,660
 $9,102
System sales growth9% 6% 5% 6% 8%
System sales growth, ex FX and 53rd week8% 6% 7% 5% 8%
Same-store sales growth5% 4% 4% 2% 5%
Shares outstanding at year end300
 306
 332
 355
 420
Cash dividends declared per common share$1.68
 $1.44
 $0.90
 $1.73
 $1.74
Market price per share at year end$100.73
 $91.92
 $81.61
 $63.33
 $73.05

The table above reflects the impact of the adoption of new lease accounting standards in fiscal year 2019. Refer to Note 2 in our Consolidated Financial Statements for information regarding our adoption of the new lease standards.


(a)Financial data for prior years has been recast to present the results of the Separation as discontinued operations and reflects amounts related to continuing operations unless otherwise noted. Store count data for prior years has been recast to exclude the Little Sheep and East Dawning stores operated by our former China Division and reflect all other former China Division Company operated stores as franchise units within the KFC and Pizza Hut Divisions. KFC Division, Pizza Hut Division and Taco Bell Division system sales growth has been recast to reflect the integration of the former India and China Divisions. See Note 4 regarding details of the Separation.

(b)See Note 5 for discussion of Refranchising gain (loss) for fiscal years 2016, 2015 and 2014. Fiscal year 2013 primarily reflects net gains from refranchising Taco Bell restaurants in the U.S. Fiscal year 2012 included $122 million in net gains from refranchising restaurants in the U.S., primarily Taco Bells, and $70 million in losses related to the refranchising of our then remaining Company-owned Pizza Hut UK dine-in restaurants.

(c)In addition to the results provided in accordance with U.S. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (“GAAP”),the Company provides non-GAAP measurements which present operating results from continuing operations on a basis excluding Special Items.  The Company uses earnings from continuing operations excluding Special Items as a key performance measure of results of operations for the purpose of evaluating performance internally and Special Items are not included in any of our segment results.  This non-GAAP measurement is not intended to replace the presentation of our financial results in accordance with GAAP.  Rather, the Company believes that the presentation of earnings from continuing operations excluding Special Items provides additional information to investors to facilitate the comparison of past and present results, excluding items that the Company does not believe are indicative of our ongoing operations due to their size and/or nature.  

2016, 2015The table above reflects the impact of the adoption of new revenue recognition accounting standards in fiscal year 2018. Refer to Note 2 in our Consolidated Financial Statements for further information.

System sales growth measures in 2019 and 2014 Special Items are describedSystem unit growth in further detail within our2018 reflects the addition of approximately 1,300 Telepizza units in December 2018. See Management's Discussion and Analysis ("MD&A") Part II, Item 7 for a description of the Telepizza strategic alliance.

Fiscal years for our U.S. and certain international subsidiaries that operate on a weekly periodic calendar include 52 weeks in 2018, 2017 and 2015 and 53 weeks in 2019 and 2016. Refer to Note 2 in our Consolidated Financial ConditionStatements for additional details related to our fiscal calendar, including the impact of the 53rd week on our results in 2019. In 2019, the 53rd week added $24 million to Operating Profit and Results$17 million to our Net Income. In 2016, the 53rd week added $28 million to Operating Profit.

Discontinued operations in 2016 and 2015 reflects the spin-off of Operations.our China business into an independent, publicly-traded company (the "Separation").

The historical stock price for year end 2015 does not reflect any adjustment for the impact of the Separation.

The non-GAAP measures of System sales growth, System sales growth excluding the impacts of foreign currency translation ("FX") and 53rd week and Diluted earnings per share from continuing operations excluding Special Items are discussed in further detail in our MD&A within Part II, Item 7.

Same-store sales growth and System net new unit growth are performance metrics and discussed in further detail in our MD&A within Part II, Item 7.

See discussion of our 2019, 2018 and 2017 Special Items in 2013our MD&A. Special Items in 2016 positively impacted Operating Profit by $73$35 million and positively impacted Net Income by $33 million, primarily due to refranchisingRefranchising gains, on the sale of restaurants in the U.S. (primarily Taco Bells), partially offset by $10$67 million in pension settlementcosts associated with YUM's Strategic Transformation Initiatives, $30 million in share-based compensation charges and $5 million of expense related to U.S. productivity initiatives and realignment of resources. Additionally, in 2013, we incurred $118 million of premiums paid and other costs related to the extinguishmentSeparation and $26 million due to costs associated with the KFC Acceleration Agreement. Additionally, in 2016, we incurred $26 million within Other Pension (income) expense primarily due to a settlement charge associated with an option for certain employees to voluntarily elect an early payout of debt that were considered Special Items and were recorded in Interest expense, net.their pension benefits. Special Items in 20122015 negatively impacted Operating Profit by $16$91 million primarilyand negatively impacted Net Income by $95 million, due to $84 million in pension settlement charges and $70 million of lossescosts associated with the refranchising of the Pizza Hut UK dine-in business, partially offset by $122 million in U.S. refranchising net gains. Special Items resulted in cumulative net tax benefits of $23 millionKFC Acceleration Agreement and $1 million in 2013 and 2012, respectively.Refranchising losses.

(d)System sales growth includes the results of all restaurants regardless of ownership, including company-owned and franchise restaurants that operate our Concepts.  Sales of franchise restaurants typically generate ongoing franchise fees for the Company at a rate of 3% to 6% of sales.  Franchise restaurant sales are not included in Company sales on the Consolidated Statements of Income; however, the franchise fees are included in the Company’s revenues.  We believe system sales growth is useful to investors as a significant indicator of the overall strength of our business as it incorporates all of our revenue drivers, Company and franchise same-store sales as well as net unit growth.  

Selected financial data for years 2016 and 2015 has been recast from that originally presented to present a change in our reporting calendar and the retroactive adoption of an accounting standard related to the presentation of net periodic pension cost and net periodic postretirement benefit cost.
(e)Local currency represents the percentage change excluding the impact of foreign currency translation.  These amounts are derived by translating current year results at prior year average exchange rates.  We believe the elimination of the foreign currency translation impact provides better year-to-year comparability without the distortion of foreign currency fluctuations.

(f)
Fiscal years 2015, 2014, 2013 and 2012 include 52 weeks and fiscal year 2016 includes 53 weeks. The estimated impacts of the 53rd week on Company sales, Franchise and license fees and income and Operating Profit in 2016 were increases of $55 million, $21 million and $27 million, respectively. The 53rd week positively impacted Division system sales growth by 1%, 1% and 2% for KFC, Pizza Hut and Taco Bell, respectively. Refer to Note 2 for additional details related to our fiscal calendar.

(g)Historical stock prices prior to November 1, 2016, do not reflect any adjustment for the impact of the Separation.

The selected financial data should be read in conjunction with the Consolidated Financial Statements.

22



Item 7.Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.

Introduction and Overview

The following Management’s Discussion and Analysis (“MD&A”), should be read in conjunction with the Consolidated Financial Statements (“Financial Statements”) in Item 8 and the Forward-Looking Statements and the Risk Factors set forth in Item 1A.  All Note references herein refer to the Notes to the Financial Statements. Tabular amounts are displayed in millions of U.S. dollars except per share and unit count amounts, or as otherwise specifically identified. Percentages may not recompute due to rounding.

YUM!Yum! Brands, Inc. (“YUM”("Company", “YUM”, "we", "us" or the “Company”"our") operatesfranchises or franchisesoperates a worldwide system of over 43,50050,000 restaurants in more than 135150 countries and territories, operatingprimarily under the concepts of KFC, Pizza Hut orand Taco Bell (collectively, the "Concepts") brands.. These three Concepts are the global leaders inof the chicken, pizza and Mexican-style food categories, respectively.  Of the over 43,50050,000 restaurants, 7% are operated by the Company and its subsidiaries and 93%98% are operated by franchisees.

As of December 31, 2016,2019, YUM consists of three operating segments:

The KFC Division which includes theour worldwide operations of the KFC concept
The Pizza Hut Division which includes theour worldwide operations of the Pizza Hut concept
The Taco Bell Division which includes theour worldwide operations of the Taco Bell concept

Effective JanuaryThrough our Recipe for Growth and Good we intend to unlock the growth potential of our Concepts and YUM, drive increased collaboration across our Concepts and geographies and consistently deliver better customer experiences, improved economics and higher rates of growth. Key enablers include accelerated use of technology and better leverage of our systemwide scale.

Our Recipe for Growth is based on four key drivers:

Unrivaled Culture and Talent: Leverage our culture and people capability to fuel brand performance and franchise success
Unmatched Operating Capability: Recruit and equip the best restaurant operators in the world to deliver great customer experiences
Relevant, Easy and Distinctive Brands: Innovate and elevate iconic restaurant brands people trust and champion
Bold Restaurant Development: Drive market and franchise expansion with strong economics and value

Our Recipe for Good reflects our global citizenship and sustainability strategy and practices, while reinforcing our public commitment to drive socially responsible growth, risk management and sustainable stewardship of our food, planet and people.  

On October 11, 2016 the India Division was segmented by brand, integrated into theYUM announced our transformation plans to drive global expansion of our KFC, Pizza Hut and Taco Bell Divisions, and is no longer a separate operating segment. While our consolidated results were not impacted, we have restated our historical segment information for consistent presentation.

On October 31, 2016 (the “Distribution Date”brands (“YUM's Strategic Transformation Initiatives”), we completed following the spin-off of our China business (the "Separation") into an independent publicly-traded company under the name of Yum China Holdings, Inc. (“Yum China”).   OnAt this time, we established transformation goals that were met by the Distribution Date, we distributed to eachend of our shareholders of record as of the close of business on October 19, 2016 (the “Record Date”), one share of Yum China common stock for each share of our Common Stock held as of the Record Date. The distribution was structured to be a tax free distribution to our U.S. shareholders for federal income tax purposes in the United States. Yum China’s common stock now trades on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol “YUMC.” After the distribution, we do not beneficially own any shares of Yum China common stock.2019 including becoming:

Concurrent with the Separation, a subsidiary of the Company entered into a Master License Agreement with a subsidiary of Yum China for the exclusive right to use and sublicense the use of intellectual property owned by YUM and its affiliates for the development and operation of KFC, Pizza Hut and Taco Bell restaurants in China. Prior to the Separation, our operations in mainland China were reported in our former China Division segment results. As a result of the Separation, the results of operations, assets and liabilities, and cash flows of the separated business are presented as discontinued operations in our Consolidated Statements of Income, Consolidated Balance Sheets and Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for all periods presented. See additional information related to the impact of the Separation in Item 8, Note 4 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

On October 11, 2016, we announced our strategic transformation plans to drive global expansion of our KFC, Pizza Hut and Taco Bell brands (“YUM’s Strategic Transformation Initiatives”) following the Separation. Major features of the Company’s transformation and growth strategy involve being more focused, franchised and efficient. YUM’s Strategic Transformation Initiatives below represent the continuation of YUM’s transformation of its operating model and capital structure.

More Focused. Four growth drivers will form the basis of YUM’s strategic plans and repeatable business model to accelerate same-store sales growth and net-new restaurant development at KFC, Pizza Hut and Taco Bell around the world over the long term. The Company will focus on becoming best-in-class in:
Building Distinctive, Relevant Brands
Developing Unmatched Franchise Operating Capability
Driving Bold Restaurant Development
Growing Unrivaled Culture and Talent
More Focused.   By focusing on four growth drivers similar to those that make up our Recipe for Growth above we accelerated system sales growth to 8% in 2019 (excluding the impacts of the 53rd week and foreign currency translation).

More Franchised. YUM intends to increaseThe Company successfully increased franchise restaurant ownership to at least 98% byas of the end of 2018.

More Efficient. The Company intends to revamprevamped its financial profile, improving the efficiency of its organization and cost structure globally, by:
Reducing annual capital expenditures associated with Company-operated restaurant maintenance and other projects and funded additional capital for new Company units through the refranchising of existing Company units.  Capital spending in 2019 net of refranchising proceeds was $86 million.
Reducing annual capital expenditures to approximately $100 million in 2019;
ReducingLowering General and administrative expenses ("G&A") expenses by a cumulative ~$300 million over the next three years;to 1.7% of system sales in 2019; and


Maintaining an optimized capital structure of ~5.0x Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation and Amortization (“EBITDA”) leverage.

Since the fourth quarter of 2015,From 2017 through 2019, we have returned approximately $7.2 billion of capital to shareholders through share repurchases and cash dividends, funding the repurchases through a recapitalization and issuance of $5.2 billion of incremental borrowings in 2016. Over the next 3 years, we intend to return an additional $6.5 - $7.0 billion to shareholders through share repurchases and cash dividends. We intend to fundfunded these shareholder returns through a combination of refranchising proceeds, free cash flow generation and maintenance of our five times ~5.0xEBITDA leverage. We anticipate generatinggenerated pre-tax proceeds in excess of $2$2.8 billion net of tax, through our refranchising initiatives.initiatives to achieve targeted franchise ownership of 98%. Refer to the Liquidity and Capital Resources section of this MD&A for additional details.


 
Going forward, we expect to:

Maintain a capital structure of ~5.0x EBITDA leverage;

Invest capital in a manner consistent with an asset light, franchisor model; and

Allocate G&A in an efficient manner that provides leverage to operating profit growth while at the same time opportunistically investing in strategic growth initiatives.

We intend for this MD&A to provide the reader with information that will assist in understanding our results of operations, including performance metrics that management uses to assess the Company's performance. Throughout this MD&A, we commonly discuss the following performance metrics:

TheSame-store sales growth is the estimated percentage change in sales of all restaurants that have been open and in the YUM system for one year or more, including those temporarily closed. From time-to-time restaurants may be temporarily closed due to remodeling or image enhancement, rebuilding, natural disasters, health epidemic or pandemic, landlord disputes or other issues. We believe same-store sales growth is useful to investors because our results are heavily dependent on the results of our Concepts' existing store base. Additionally, same-store sales growth is reflective of the strength of our Brands, the effectiveness of our operational and advertising initiatives and local economic and consumer trends. In 2019, when calculating same-store sales growth we also included in our prior year base the sales of stores that were added as a result of the Telepizza strategic alliance in December 2018 and that were open for one year or more. See description of the Telepizza strategic alliance within this MD&A.

Net new unit growth reflects new unit openings offset by store closures, by us and our franchisees. To determine whether a restaurant meets the definition of a unit we consider whether the restaurant has operations that are ongoing and independent from another YUM unit, serves the primary product of one of our Concepts, operates under a separate franchise agreement (if operated by a franchisee) and has substantial and sustainable sales. We believe net new unit growth is useful to investors because we depend on net new units for a significant portion of our growth. Additionally, net new unit growth is generally reflective of the economic returns to us and our franchisees from opening and operating our Concept restaurants.

Company restaurant profit ("Restaurant profit") is defined as Company sales less expenses incurred directly by our Company-owned restaurants in generating Company sales. Company restaurant margin as a percentage of sales is defined as Restaurant profit divided by Company sales. Restaurant profit is useful to investors as it provides a measure of profitability for our Company-owned stores.

In addition to the results provided in accordance with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles in the United States of America ("GAAP"), the Company provides certain percentage changesthe following non-GAAP measurements.

System sales, System sales excluding the impactimpacts of foreign currency translation (“FX” or “Forex”("FX").  These amounts are derived by translating current year results at prior year average exchange rates.  We believe, and, in 2019, System sales excluding FX and the eliminationimpact of the foreign currency translation impact provides better year-to-year comparability without the distortion of foreign currency fluctuations.

53rd week for our U.S. subsidiaries and certain international subsidiaries that operate on a weekly periodic calendar. System sales growth includesinclude the results of all restaurants regardless of ownership, including company-ownedCompany-owned and franchise restaurants that operate our Concepts.restaurants. Sales ofat franchise restaurants typically generate ongoing franchise and license fees for the Company at a rate of 3% to 6% of sales. Franchise restaurant sales are not included in Company sales on the Consolidated Statements of Income; however, the franchise and license fees derived from franchise restaurants are included in the Company’s revenues. We believe systemSystem sales growth is useful to investors as a significant indicator of the overall strength of our business as it incorporates all of our significant revenue drivers, Company and franchise same-store sales as well as net unit growth.

Same-store sales growth is the estimated percentage change in sales of all restaurants that have been openDiluted Earnings Per Share excluding Special Items (as defined below);

Effective Tax Rate excluding Special Items;

Core Operating Profit and, in the YUM system one year or more.

Company restaurant profit ("Restaurant profit") is defined as Company sales less expenses incurred directly by our Company-owned restaurants in generating Company sales.  Company restaurant margin as a percentage of sales is defined as Restaurant profit divided by Company sales. Within the Company Sales and Restaurant2019, Core Operating Profit sections of this MD&A, Store Portfolio Actions represent the net impact of new unit openings, acquisitions, refranchising and store closures, and Other primarily representsexcluding the impact of same-store salesthe 53rd week. Core Operating Profit excludes Special Items and FX and we use Core Operating Profit for the purposes of evaluating performance internally.

These non-GAAP measurements are not intended to replace the presentation of our financial results in accordance with GAAP. Rather, the Company believes that the presentation of these non-GAAP measurements provide additional information to investors to facilitate the comparison of past and present operations.



Special Items are not included in any of our Division segment results as well asthe Company does not believe they are indicative of our ongoing operations due to their size and/or nature. Our chief operating decision maker does not consider the impact of changes in costs such as inflation/deflation.Special Items when assessing segment performance.

Operating margin isCertain non-GAAP measurements are presented excluding the impact of FX. These amounts are derived by translating current year results at prior year average exchange rates. We believe the elimination of the FX impact provides better year-to-year comparability without the distortion of foreign currency fluctuations.

For 2019 we provided Core Operating Profit divided by Total revenues.

In addition toexcluding the results provided in accordance with U.S. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles ("GAAP") , the Company has provided non-GAAP measurements which present Diluted Earnings Per Share from Continuing Operations excluding Special Items, our Effective Tax Rate excluding Special Items, Core Operating Profit and Core Operating Profit excluding 53rd week. Core Operating Profit excludes Special Items and foreign currency translation and we use Core Operating Profit for the purposes of evaluating performance internally. Special Items are not included in any of our externally reported segment results, and we believe the elimination of the foreign currency translation impact provides better year-to-year comparability without the distortion of foreign currency fluctuations. We provide Core Operating Profit excluding 53rd week to further enhance the comparability of fiscal 2016, which had a 53rd week, with prior year results. These non-GAAP measurements are not intended to replace the presentation of our financial results in accordance with GAAP.  Rather, the Company believes that the presentation of Diluted Earnings Per Share from Continuing Operations excluding Special Items, our Effective Tax Rate excluding Special Items, Core Operating Profit and Core Operating Profit excluding 53rd week, provide additional information to investors to facilitate the comparison of past and present operations, excluding items that the Company does not believe are indicative of our ongoing operations due to their size and/or nature.

All Note references herein refer to the Notes to the Financial Statements.  Tabular amounts are displayed in millions of U.S. dollars except per share and unit count amounts, or as otherwise specifically identified. Unless otherwise stated, financial results herein reflect continuing operations of the Company. Percentages may not recompute due53rd week and System sales excluding the impact of the 53rd week to rounding.


further enhance the comparability given the 53rd week that was part of our fiscal calendar in 2019.

Results of Operations

Summary

All comparisons within this summary are versus the same period a year ago exclude the impact of Special Items and unless otherwise stated include the impact of a 53rd53rd week in 2016, unless otherwise noted.  2019.  For discussion of our results of operations for 2018 compared to 2017, refer to the Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations included in Part II, Item 7 of our Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2018, filed with the SEC on February 21, 2019.

2016For 2019, GAAP diluted EPS from Continuing Operations increased 18%decreased 12% to $2.48$4.14 per share. 2016share, and diluted EPS, from Continuing Operations excluding Special Items, increased 5%12% to $2.45$3.55 per share.

2019 financial highlights:
% Change
System Sales,
ex FX
Same-Store SalesNet New UnitsGAAP Operating ProfitCore Operating Profit
KFC Division+10+4+7+10+14
Pizza Hut Division+8Even+1+6+8
Taco Bell Division+9+5+4+8+8
Worldwide+9+3+4(16)+12

Results Excluding 53rd Week in 2019
(% Change)
System Sales, ex FXCore Operating Profit
KFC Division+9+13
Pizza Hut Division+7+7
Taco Bell Division+8+6
Worldwide+8+11

Additionally:

Adjusting the prior year base to include units added as a result of our fourth quarter 2018 strategic alliance with Telepizza, system sales growth, excluding the impacts of foreign currency translation and 53rd week, would have been 7% and 2% for Worldwide and the Pizza Hut Division, respectively.

During the year, we opened 2,040 net new units for 4% net new unit growth.

During the year, we refranchised 25 restaurants and sold certain restaurant assets associated with existing franchise restaurants to the franchisee for total pre-tax proceeds of $110 million.  We recorded net refranchising gains of $37 million related to these transactions.

During the year, we repurchased 7.8 million shares totaling $810 million at an average price of $104. 



During the year, we recognized pre-tax expense of $77 million related to the change in fair value of our investment in Grubhub, which resulted in a negative ($0.19) impact to diluted EPS on the year.

Foreign currency translation from our international operations negatively impacted GAAPDivisional Operating Profit unfavorably for the year by $55$46 million.

2016 financial highlights are below:
  2016 % Change
  System Sales, ex FX Same Store Sales Net New Units GAAP Operating Profit Core Operating Profit
KFC Division 7% 3 % 3% 5% 11%
Pizza Hut Division 2% (1)% 2% 7% 9%
Taco Bell Division 6% 2 % 3% 11% 10%
Worldwide 5% 1 % 3% 16% 13%

  
Results Excluding 53rd Week (2016 % Change)
  System Sales, ex FX Core Operating Profit
KFC Division 6% 10%
Pizza Hut Division 1% 7%
Taco Bell Division 4% 8%
Worldwide 4% 11%
Our effective tax rate for the year was 5.7% and our effective tax rate, excluding Special Items, was 19.8%.




25




Worldwide

GAAP Results
Amount % B/(W)Amount % B/(W)
2016 2015 2014 2016 20152019 2018 2017 2019 2018
Company sales$4,200
 $4,356
 $4,503

(4)   (3) $1,546
 $2,000
 $3,572

(23)   (44) 
Franchise and license fees and income2,166
 2,084
 2,084

4
   
 
Franchise and property revenues2,660
 2,482
 2,306

7
   8
 
Franchise contributions for advertising and other services1,391
 1,206
 
 15
 N/A
 
Total revenues$6,366
 $6,440
 $6,587

(1)   (2) $5,597
 $5,688
 $5,878

(2)   (3) 
          
Restaurant profit$702
 $709
 $633

(1)   12
  $311
 $366
 $618

(15)   (41)  
Restaurant Margin %16.7% 16.3% 14.1% 0.4
 ppts. 2.2
 ppts.
Restaurant margin %20.1% 18.3% 17.3% 1.8
 ppts. 1.0
 ppts.
                    
G&A expenses$917
 $895
 $999
 (2) 10
 
Franchise and property expenses180
 188
 237
 4
 21
 
Franchise advertising and other services expense1,368
 1,208
 
 (13) N/A
 
Refranchising (gain) loss(37) (540) (1,083) (93) (50) 
Other (income) expense4
 7
 10
 NM
 NM
 
Operating Profit$1,625
 $1,402
 $1,517

16
   (8)  $1,930
 $2,296
 $2,761

(16)   (17)  
                    
Investment (income) expense, net67
 (9) (5) NM
 88
 
Other pension (income) expense4
 14
 47
 71
 70
 
Interest expense, net307
 141
 143

NM
   1
  486
 452
 445

(8)   (1)  
Income tax provision324
 325
 368


 11
  79
 297
 934

74
 68
  
Income from continuing operations994
 936
 1,006
 6
 (7) 
Income from discontinued operations, net of tax625
 357
 45
 75
 NM
 
Net Income$1,619
 $1,293
 $1,051

25
   23
  $1,294
 $1,542
 $1,340

(16)   15
  
Diluted EPS(a) from continuing operations
$2.48
 $2.11
 $2.22
 18
 (5) 
Diluted EPS(a) from discontinued operations
$1.56
 $0.81
 $0.10
 94
 NM
 
          
Diluted EPS(a)
$4.04
 $2.92
 $2.32

39
   26
  $4.14
 $4.69
 $3.77

(12)   24
  
Effective tax rate - continuing operations24.6% 25.8% 26.7%
1.2
 ppts. 0.9
 ppts.
Effective tax rate5.7% 16.2% 41.1%
10.5
 ppts. 24.9
 ppts.

(a)See Note 3 for the number of shares used in these calculations.this calculation.

Performance Metrics
      % Increase (Decrease)      % Increase (Decrease)
Unit Count2016 2015 2014 2016 20152019 2018 2017 2019 
2018(a)
Franchise40,758
 39,263
 37,984
 4
 3
49,257
 47,268
 43,603
 4 8
Company-owned2,859
 3,159
 3,247
 (9) (3)913
 856
 1,481
 7 (42)
43,617
 42,422
 41,231
 3
 3
Total50,170
 48,124
 45,084
 4 7

(a)2018 unit growth includes units added as a result of our fourth quarter 2018 strategic alliance with Telepizza.

  2019 2018 2017
Same-Store Sales Growth % 3 2 2



  % B/(W)
  2016 2015
System Sales Growth, reported 2 
Same-Store Sales Growth 1 2
System Sales Growth, excluding FX 5 5
System Sales Growth, excluding FX and 53rd week
 4 N/A
     
Non-GAAP Items    
Core Operating Profit Growth 13 6
Core Operating Profit Growth excluding 53rd week 11 N/A
Diluted EPS from Continuing Operations excluding Special Items 5 6
Non-GAAP Items      
       
Non-GAAP Items, along with the reconciliation to the most comparable GAAP financial measure, are presented below.
       
  2019 2018 2017
System Sales Growth %, reported 7
 5
 4
System Sales Growth %, excluding FX 9
 5
 4
System Sales Growth %, excluding FX and 53rd week 8
 N/A
 5
Core Operating Profit Growth % 12
 Even
 7
Core Operating Profit Growth %, excluding 53rd week 11
 N/A
 9
Diluted EPS Growth %, excluding Special Items 12
 7
 20
Effective Tax Rate excluding Special Items 19.8% 20.4% 18.8%



26



Extra Week in 2016

Fiscal 2016 included a 53rd week for all of our U.S. businesses and certain of our non-U.S. businesses that report 13 four-week periods versus 12 months. See Note 2 for additional details related to our fiscal calendar. The following table summarizes the estimated impact of the 53rd week on Revenues and Operating Profit:

 KFC Division Pizza Hut Division Taco Bell Division Unallocated Total
Revenues         
Company sales$26
 $5
 $24
 $
 $55
Franchise and license fees and income8
 6
 7
 
 21
Total revenues$34
 $11
 $31
 $
 $76
          
Operating Profit         
Franchise and license fees and income$8
 $6
 $7
 $
 $21
Restaurant profit6
 1
 7
 
 14
G&A expenses(3) (2) (2) (1) (8)
Operating Profit$11
 $5
 $12
 $(1) $27



Non-GAAP Items

Non-GAAP Items, along with the reconciliation to the most comparable GAAP financial measure, are presented below.
  Year
 
Detail of Special Items
 2016 2015 2014
Refranchising initiatives(a)
 $141
 $(20) $13
YUM's Strategic Transformation Initiatives  (See Note 5)
 (71) 
 
Non-cash charges associated with share-based compensation (See Note 5)
 (30) 
 
Costs associated with KFC U.S. Acceleration Agreement (See Note 5) (26) (72) 
Settlement charges associated with pension deferred vested project (See Note 5) (25) 
 
Other Special Items Income (Expense) (3) 
 3
Special Items Income (Expense) - Operating Profit (14) (92) 16
Tax Benefit (Expense) on Special Items(b)
 27
 (4) (4)
Special Items Income (Expense), net of tax - Continuing Operations $13
 $(96) $12
Average diluted shares outstanding 400
 443
 453
Special Items diluted EPS $0.03
 $(0.22) $0.02
       
Reconciliation of GAAP Operating Profit to Core Operating Profit and Core Operating Profit, excluding 53rd Week
      
       
Consolidated      
GAAP Operating Profit $1,625
 $1,402
 $1,517
Special Items Income (Expense) - Operating Profit (14) (92) 16
Foreign Currency Impact on Reported Operating Profit(b)
 (55) (92) N/A
Core Operating Profit $1,694
 $1,586
 $1,501
Impact of 53rd Week
 27
 N/A
 N/A
Core Operating Profit, excluding 53rd Week
 $1,667
 $1,586
 $1,501
       
KFC Division      
GAAP Operating Profit $874
 $832
 876
Foreign Currency Impact on Reported Operating Profit(b)
 (48) (84) N/A
Core Operating Profit 922
 916
 876
Impact of 53rd Week
 11
 N/A
 N/A
Core Operating Profit, excluding 53rd Week
 $911
 $916
 $876
       
Pizza Hut Division      
GAAP Operating Profit $370
 $347
 $347
Foreign Currency Impact on Reported Operating Profit(b)
 (7) (8) N/A
Core Operating Profit 377
 355
 347
Impact of 53rd Week
 5
 N/A
 N/A
Core Operating Profit, excluding 53rd Week
 $372
 $355
 $347
       
Taco Bell Division      
GAAP Operating Profit $593
 $536
 $478
Foreign Currency Impact on Reported Operating Profit(b)
 
 
 N/A
Core Operating Profit 593
 536
 478
Impact of 53rd Week
 12
 N/A
 N/A
Core Operating Profit, excluding 53rd Week
 $581
 $536
 $478
       
  Year
 Detail of Special Items
 2019 2018 2017
Refranchising gain (loss)(a) 
 $12
 $540
 $1,083
YUM's Strategic Transformation Initiatives  (See Note 4)
 
 (8) (23)
Costs associated with Pizza Hut U.S. Transformation Agreement (See Note 4) (13) (6) (31)
Costs associated with KFC U.S. Acceleration Agreement (See Note 4) 
 (2) (17)
Non-cash credits (charges) associated with share-based compensation (See Note 4)
 
 3
 (18)
Other Special Items Income (Expense)(b)
 (10) 3
 7
Special Items Income (Expense) - Operating Profit (11) 530
 1,001
Special Items - Other Pension Income (Expense) (See Note 4) 
 
 (23)
Interest expense, net(b)
 (2) 
 
Special Items Income (Expense) before Income Taxes (13) 530
 978
Tax Expense on Special Items(c)
 (30) (96) (256)
Tax Benefit - Intercompany transfer of intellectual property(d) 
 226
 
 
Tax Benefit (Expense) - U.S. Tax Act(e)
 
 66
 (434)
Special Items Income, net of tax $183
 $500
 $288
Average diluted shares outstanding 313
 329
 355
Special Items diluted EPS $0.59
 $1.52
 $0.81
       


       
Reconciliation of Diluted EPS from Continuing Operations to Diluted EPS from Continuing Operations excluding Special Items      
Diluted EPS from Continuing Operations $2.48
 $2.11
 $2.22
Special Items EPS 0.03
 (0.22) 0.02
Diluted EPS from Continuing Operations excluding Special Items $2.45
 $2.33
 $2.20
       
Reconciliation of GAAP Effective Tax Rate to Effective Tax Rate excluding Special Items      
GAAP Effective Tax Rate 24.6 % 25.8% 26.7 %
Impact on Tax Rate as a result of Special Items(c)
 (1.7)% 2.1% (0.1)%
Effective Tax Rate excluding Special Items 26.3 % 23.7% 26.8 %
       
Reconciliation of GAAP Operating Profit to Core Operating Profit and Core Operating Profit, excluding 53rd Week      
       
Consolidated      
GAAP Operating Profit $1,930
 $2,296
 $2,761
Special Items Income (Expense) - Operating Profit (11) 530
 1,001
Foreign Currency Impact on Divisional Operating Profit(f)
 (46) 1
 N/A
Core Operating Profit 1,987
 1,765
 1,760
Impact of 53rd Week 24
 N/A
 N/A
Core Operating Profit, excluding 53rd Week $1,963
 $1,765
 $1,760
       
KFC Division      
GAAP Operating Profit $1,052
 $959
 $981
Foreign Currency Impact on Divisional Operating Profit(f)
 (39) 
 N/A
Core Operating Profit 1,091
 959
 981
Impact of 53rd Week 8
 N/A
 N/A
Core Operating Profit, excluding 53rd Week $1,083
 $959
 $981
       
Pizza Hut Division      
GAAP Operating Profit $369
 $348
 $341
Foreign Currency Impact on Divisional Operating Profit(f)
 (7) 1
 N/A
Core Operating Profit 376
 347
 341
Impact of 53rd Week 3
 N/A
 N/A
Core Operating Profit, excluding 53rd Week $373
 $347
 $341
       
Taco Bell Division      
GAAP Operating Profit $683
 $633
 $619
Foreign Currency Impact on Divisional Operating Profit(f)
 
 
 N/A
Core Operating Profit 683
 633
 619
Impact of 53rd Week 13
 N/A
 N/A
Core Operating Profit, excluding 53rd Week $670
 $633
 $619
       
       
Reconciliation of Diluted EPS to Diluted EPS excluding Special Items      
Diluted EPS $4.14
 $4.69
 $3.77
Special Items Diluted EPS 0.59
 1.52
 0.81
Diluted EPS excluding Special Items $3.55
 $3.17
 $2.96
       
Reconciliation of GAAP Effective Tax Rate to Effective Tax Rate, excluding Special Items      
GAAP Effective Tax Rate 5.7 % 16.2 % 41.1%
Impact on Tax Rate as a result of Special Items(c)(d)(e)
 (14.1)% (4.2)% 22.3%
Effective Tax Rate excluding Special Items 19.8 % 20.4 % 18.8%
       


       
Reconciliation of GAAP Company sales to System sales, System sales, excluding FX and System sales, excluding FX and 53rd week      
       
Consolidated      
GAAP Company sales(g)
 $1,546
 $2,000
 $3,572
Franchise sales 51,038
 47,237
 43,122
System sales 52,584
 49,237
 46,694
Foreign Currency Impact on System sales(h)
 (1,169) 186
 N/A
System sales, excluding FX 53,753
 49,051
 46,694
Impact of 53rd week 454
 N/A
 N/A
System sales, excluding FX and 53rd Week $53,299
 $49,051
 $46,694
       
KFC Division      
GAAP Company sales(g)
 $571
 $894
 $1,928
Franchise sales 27,329
 25,345
 22,587
System sales 27,900
 26,239
 24,515
Foreign Currency Impact on System sales(h)
 (898) 142
 N/A
System sales, excluding FX 28,798
 26,097
 24,515
Impact of 53rd week 167
 N/A
 N/A
System sales, excluding FX and 53rd Week $28,631
 $26,097
 $24,515
       
Pizza Hut Division      
GAAP Company sales(g)
 $54
 $69
 $285
Franchise sales 12,846
 12,143
 11,749
System sales 12,900
 12,212
 12,034
Foreign Currency Impact on System sales(h)
 (259) 47
 N/A
System sales, excluding FX 13,159
 12,165
 12,034
Impact of 53rd week 103
 N/A
 N/A
System sales, excluding FX and 53rd Week $13,056
 $12,165
 $12,034
       
Taco Bell Division      
GAAP Company sales(g)
 $921
 $1,037
 $1,359
Franchise sales 10,863
 9,749
 8,786
System sales 11,784
 10,786
 10,145
Foreign Currency Impact on System sales(h)
 (12) (3) N/A
System sales, excluding FX 11,796
 10,789
 10,145
Impact of 53rd week 184
 N/A
 N/A
System sales, excluding FX and 53rd Week $11,612
 $10,789
 $10,145
       

(a)We have historically recordedreflected as Special Items those refranchising gains and losses in the U.S. as Special Items due to the scope of our U.S. refranchising program and the volatility in associated gains and losses. Beginning in 2016, we are also including all international refranchising gains and losses in Special Items. The inclusion in Special Items of these additional international refranchising gains and losses is the result of the anticipated size and volatility of refranchising initiatives outside the U.S. that will take placewere recorded in connection with or prior to our previously announced plans to have at least 98% franchise restaurant ownership by the end of 2018. InternationalAs such, refranchising gains and losses in 2015 and 2014 previously not included inrecorded during 2019 as Special Items primarily include gains or losses associated with sales of underlying real estate associated with stores that were not significantfranchised as of December 31, 2018 or true-ups to refranchising gains and have not been reclassified intolosses recorded prior to December 31, 2018.

During the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017, we recorded net refranchising gains of $12 million, $540 million and $1,083 million, respectively, that have been reflected as Special Items.

(b)In the second quarter of 2019 we recorded charges of $8 million and $2 million to Other (income) expense and Interest expense, net, respectively, related to cash payments in excess of our recorded liability to settle contingent consideration


associated with our 2013 acquisition of the KFC Turkey and Pizza Hut Turkey businesses. Consistent with prior adjustments to the recorded contingent consideration we have reflected this as a Special Item.

(c)Tax Expense on Special Items was determined based upon the impact of the nature, as well as the jurisdiction of the respective individual components within Special Items. See Note 5 for discussionAdditionally, we increased our Income tax provision by $34 million in the fourth quarter of Refranchising Gain2019 to record a reserve against and Losses.by $19 million in the second quarter of 2018 to correct an error related to the tax recorded on a prior year divestiture, the effects of which were previously recorded as a Special Item.

(b)(d)During the year ended December 31, 2019 we completed intercompany transfers of certain intellectual property rights.   As a result of the transfer of certain of these rights, largely to subsidiaries in the United Kingdom, we received a step-up in tax basis to current fair value under applicable tax law.   To the extent this step-up in basis will be amortizable against future taxable income, we recognized a one-time deferred tax benefit of $226 million as a Special Item in the year ended December 31, 2019. See Note 17 for further discussion.

(e)In 2018, we recorded a $35 million decrease related to our provisional tax expense recorded in the fourth quarter of 2017 associated with the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 ("Tax Act") that was reported as a Special Item.  We also recorded a Special Items tax benefit of $31 million in 2018 related to 2018 U.S. foreign tax credits that became realizable directly as a result of the impact of deemed repatriation tax expense associated with the Tax Act. We recognized $434 million in our 2017 Income tax provision that was reported as a Special Item as a result of the December 22, 2017 enactment of the Tax Act.

(f)The foreign currency impact on reported Operating Profit is presented in relation only to the immediately preceding year presented. When determining applicable Core Operating Profit Growth percentages, the Core Operating Profit for the current year should be compared to the prior GAAPyear Operating Profit, adjusted onlyprior to adjustment for the prior year Special Items Income (Expense).FX impact.

(c)(g)Company sales represents sales from our Company-operated stores as presented on our Consolidated Statements of Income.

(h)The tax benefit (expense) was determined based uponforeign currency impact on System sales is presented in relation only to the impact ofimmediately preceding year presented. When determining applicable System sales growth percentages, the nature, as well asSystem sales excluding FX for the jurisdiction ofcurrent year should be compared to the respective individual components within Special Items. In 2016, our tax rate on Special Items was favorably impacted byprior year System sales prior to adjustment for the utilization of capital loss carryforwards associated with U.S. refranchising. In 2015, our tax rate on Special Items was unfavorably impacted by the non-deductibility of certain losses associated with international refranchising. See Note 18.prior year FX impact.

Items Impacting Reported Results and/or Expected to Impact Future Results

The following items impacted reported results in 2019 and/or 2018 and/or are expected to impact future results. See also the Detail of Special Items section of this M&DA for other items similarly impacting results.

Extra Week in 2019

Fiscal 2019 included a 53rd week for all of our U.S. and certain international subsidiaries that operate on a period calendar. See Note 2 for additional details related to our fiscal calendar. The following table summarizes the estimated impact of the 53rdweek on Revenues and Operating Profit for the year ended December 31, 2019. The 53rd week in 2019 favorably impacted Diluted EPS by $0.05 per share.


29


 KFC Division Pizza Hut Division Taco Bell Division Total
Revenues       
Company sales$8
 $1
 $15
 $24
Franchise and property revenues9
 5
 10
 24
Franchise contributions for advertising and other services5
 5
 8
 18
Total revenues$22
 $11
 $33
 $66
        
Operating Profit       
Franchise and property revenues$9
 $5
 $10
 $24
Franchise contributions for advertising and other services5
 5
 8
 18
Restaurant profit1
 
 5
 6
Franchise and property expenses
 (1) 
 (1)
Franchise for advertising and other services expenses(5) (5) (8) (18)
G&A expenses(2) (1) (2) (5)
Operating Profit$8
 $3
 $13
 $24

Impact of Coronavirus Outbreak

Since the beginning of 2020, the novel coronavirus outbreak in mainland China has significantly impacted the operations of our largest master franchisee, Yum China, who pays us a continuing fee of 3% on system sales of our Concepts in mainland China. These continuing fees represented approximately 20% of the KFC Division and 16% of the PH Division operating profits in the year ended December 31, 2019. Through the date of the filing of this Form 10-K, Yum China has experienced widespread store closures and significant sales declines as a result of the coronavirus. Additionally, other nearby franchisees, such as those in Hong Kong and Taiwan, have experienced significant sales declines as well. While our Concepts outside of China have not experienced the same levels of same-store sales declines or store closures to date that Yum China has experienced, there can be no assurance that the impacts of the coronavirus will not have a material, adverse impact on our and our franchisees’ results on a more widespread basis. The coronavirus situation is ongoing and its dynamic nature makes it difficult to forecast any impacts on the Company’s 2020 results with any certainty. However, as of the date of this filing we expect our results for the quarter ending March 31, 2020 to be significantly impacted with potential continuing, adverse impacts beyond March 31, 2020.

Pizza Hut U.S. Franchisee Issues

During the year ended December 31, 2019 the Pizza Hut Division recorded $22 million in bad debt expense primarily associated with the nearly $600 million in continuing and initial fees earned in 2019 from franchisees. This represented an increase of $12 million versus the bad debt provision within the Division for the year ended December 31, 2018. The increased bad debt was largely attributable to a small number of U.S. franchisees who are facing financial challenges due to unit-level economics that have been pressured by wage increases and recent U.S. same-store sales declines of 1% in 2019, including a decline of 4% in the fourth quarter of 2019. Additionally, certain Pizza Hut U.S. franchisees are burdened by high debt service levels.

We continue to believe that the move of the Pizza Hut U.S. system to a more delivery-focused and modern estate will optimize our ability to grow the Pizza Hut U.S. system going forward. However, we could see impacts to our near-term results as we work through transitions of the estate and of certain franchise stores to new franchisees. These impacts could include expense related to further bad debts and payments we may be required to make with regard to franchisee lease obligations for which we remain secondarily liable. Additionally, Pizza Hut U.S. system sales could be negatively impacted by decreased system advertising spend due to lower franchisee contributions and closures of underperforming units, including certain units that are largely dine-in focused. Given the fluid nature of issues surrounding our Pizza Hut U.S. franchisees, in particular surrounding our largest Pizza Hut U.S. franchisee who owns approximately 1,225 units or 17% of the Pizza Hut U.S. system as of December 31, 2019, the potential impact to the Company’s 2020 results is difficult to forecast.

Refranchising Initiatives

During the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017, we recorded net refranchising gains of $37 million, $540 million and $1,083 million, respectively.  We have reflected those refranchising gains and losses that were recorded in connection with or prior to our previously announced plans to have at least 98% franchise restaurant ownership by the end of 2018 as Special Items. In


2019 net refranchising gains reflected as Special Items included $12 million associated with sales of underlying real estate associated with stores that were franchised as of December 31, 2018 or true-ups to refranchising gains and losses recorded prior to December 31, 2018. All net refranchising gains recorded in 2018 and 2017 were reflected as Special Items. 

Additionally, during the year ended December 31, 2019 we recorded net refranchising gains of $25 million that have not been reflected as Special Items. These net gains relate to the refranchising of restaurants in 2019 that were not part of and arose subsequent to our aforementioned plans to achieve 98% franchise ownership.

Investment in Grubhub

For the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018 we recognized pre-tax expense of $77 million and pre-tax income of $14 million, respectively, related to changes in fair value in our investment in Grubhub, Inc. ("Grubhub").  See Note 4 for further discussion of our investment in Grubhub.

Telepizza Strategic Alliance

On December 30, 2018, the Company consummated a strategic alliance with Telepizza Group S.A. (“Telepizza”), the largest non U.S.-based pizza delivery company in the world, to be the master franchisee of Pizza Hut in Latin America and portions of Europe. The key terms of the alliance are set forth below:

In Spain and Portugal Telepizza will continue operating the Telepizza brand and will oversee franchisees operating Pizza Hut branded restaurants
In Latin America (excluding Brazil), the Caribbean and Switzerland, Telepizza will progressively convert its existing restaurants to the Pizza Hut brand and oversee franchisees operating Pizza Hut branded restaurants
Telepizza will manage supply chain logistics for the entire master franchise territory and will become an authorized supplier of Pizza Hut branded restaurants
Across the regions covered by the master franchise agreement, Telepizza will target opening at least 1,300 new units over the next ten years and 2,550 units in total over 20 years

As a result of the alliance we added approximately 1,300 Telepizza units to our Pizza Hut Division unit count on December 30, 2018. In total approximately 2,300 Pizza Hut and Telepizza units are subject to the master franchise agreement as of December 31, 2019.

Based upon our ongoing and active maintenance of the Pizza Hut intellectual property as well as Telepizza’s active involvement in supply chain management and their role as a master franchisee, both parties are exposed to significant risks and rewards depending on the commercial success of the alliance. As a result, the alliance has been identified as a collaborative arrangement and upon consummation of the alliance no amounts were recorded in our Consolidated Financial Statements (other than insignificant success fees that were paid to third-party advisors). Subsequent to consummation of the deal, for all Pizza Hut restaurants that are part of the alliance, we are receiving a continuing fee of 3.5% of restaurant sales. Likewise, for most Telepizza restaurants that are part of the alliance we are receiving an alliance fee of 3.5% of restaurant sales. These fees are being recorded as Franchise and property revenues within our Consolidated Statement of Income when the related sales occur, consistent with our recognition of continuing fees for all other restaurants subject to our franchise agreements. These fees are reduced by a sales-based credit that decreases over time and, potentially, certain incentive payments if development or conversion targets are met. Previously, the existing Pizza Hut restaurants that are now subject to the master franchise agreement with Telepizza generally paid a continuing fee of 6% of restaurant sales consistent with our standard International franchise agreement terms. The impact to Operating Profit for the year ended December 31, 2019 as a result of the strategic alliance was not significant.  System Sales growth in 2019, excluding foreign currency and 53rd week, was approximately 1 and 5 percentage points higher for Worldwide and the Pizza Hut Division, respectively as a result of the strategic alliance.  Additionally, net new unit growth in 2018 was approximately 3 and 8 percentage points higher for Worldwide and the Pizza Hut Division, respectively, as a result of the strategic alliance.

KFC United Kingdom ("UK") Supply Availability Issues

On February 14, 2018, we and our franchisees transitioned to a new distributor for the products supplied to our approximately 900 KFCs in the United Kingdom and Ireland (those restaurants accounted for approximately 3% of YUM’s global system sales in the year ended December 31, 2018).  In connection with this transition, certain of the restaurants experienced supply availability issues which resulted in store closures or stores operating under a limited menu. Beginning mid-May 2018, all restaurants opened for business, offering their full menus, with advertising beginning at the end of May.  On a full-year basis in 2018, we estimated the negative impact to Core Operating Profit growth was 2 percentage points for KFC Division and 1 percentage point for YUM,


respectively, and the negative impact to same-store sales growth was 50 basis points for KFC Division and 25 basis points for YUM, respectively, as a result of these supply availability issues.

KFC Division

The KFC Division has 20,60424,104 units, 80%83% of which are located outside the U.S. The KFC Division has experienced significant unit growth in emerging markets, which comprised approximately 60% of both the Division’s units and profits, respectively, as of the end of 2016. Additionally, 93%99% of the KFC Division units were operated by franchisees as of the end of 2016.
        % B/(W) % B/(W)
        2016 2015
  2016 2015 2014 Reported Ex FX 
Ex-FX and 53rd Week
 Reported Ex FX
System Sales Growth (Decline)       2
  7
  6
  (3)  5
 
Same-Store Sales Growth       3
  N/A
  N/A
  1
  N/A
 
                      
Company sales $2,166
 $2,203
 $2,440
 (2)  5
  3
  (10)  4
 
Franchise and license fees and income 1,066
 1,032
 1,067
 3
  8
  7
  (3)  5
 
Total revenues $3,232
 $3,235
 $3,507
 
  6
  5
  (8)  4
 
                      
Restaurant profit $319
 $308
 $311
 4
  10
  8
  (1)  13
 
Restaurant margin % 14.7% 14.0% 12.8% 0.7
ppts. 0.7
ppts. 0.7
ppts. 1.2
ppts. 1.2
ppts.
                      
G&A expenses $391
 $401
 $399
 2
  (1)  
  
  (11) 
Operating Profit $874
 $832
 $876
 5
  11
  10
  (5)  5
 
2019.
        % Increase (Decrease)
Unit Count 2016 2015 2014 2016 2015
Franchise 19,183
 18,452
 17,894
 4  3
Company-owned 1,421
 1,500
 1,526
 (5) (2)
  20,604
 19,952
 19,420
 3  3

        % B/(W) % B/(W)
        2019 2018
  2019 2018 2017 Reported Ex FX Ex FX and 53rd Week in 2019 Reported Ex FX
System Sales $27,900
 $26,239
 $24,515
 6
  10
  9
  7
  6
 
Same-Store Sales Growth %       4
  N/A
  N/A  2
  N/A
 
                      
Company sales $571
 $894
 $1,928
 (36)  (33)  (34)  (54)  (53) 
Franchise and property revenues 1,390
 1,294
 1,182
 7
  11
  10
  10
  9
 
Franchise contributions for advertising and other services 530
 456
 
 16
  21
  20
  N/A  N/A 
Total revenues $2,491
 $2,644
 $3,110
 (6)  (2)  (3)  (15)  (15) 
                      
Restaurant profit $87
 $119
 $289
 (26)  (23)  (24)  (59)  (58) 
Restaurant margin % 15.3% 13.3% 15.0% 2.0
ppts. 2.0
ppts. 2.0
ppts. (1.7)
ppts. (1.5)
ppts.
                      
G&A expenses $346
 $350
 $370
 1
  (1)  (1)  5
  5
 
Franchise and property expenses 89
 107
 117
 17
  13
  13
  8
  9
 
Franchise advertising and other services expense 520
 452
 
 (15)  (20)  (19)  N/A  N/A 
Operating Profit $1,052
 $959
 $981
 10
  14
  13
  (2)  (2) 
 2015 New Builds Closures Refranchised Acquired Other 2016       % Increase (Decrease)
Unit Count 2019 2018 2017 2019 2018
Franchise 18,452
 976
 (409) 163
 
 1
 19,183
 23,759
 22,297
 20,819
 7 7
Company-owned 1,500
 120
 (35) (163) 
 (1) 1,421
 345
 324
 668
 6 (51)
Total 19,952
 1,096
 (444) 
 
 
 20,604
 24,104
 22,621
 21,487
 7 5

  2014 New Builds Closures Refranchised Acquired Other 2015
Franchise 17,894
 975
 (511) 117
 (12) (11) 18,452
Company-owned 1,526
 106
 (27) (117) 12
 
 1,500
Total 19,420
 1,081
 (538) 
 
 (11) 19,952



Company Sales and Restaurant Profit

The changes in Company sales and Restaurant profit were as follows:
 2016 vs. 2015
Income / (Expense)2015 Store Portfolio Actions Other FX 
53rd Week
 2016
Company sales$2,203
 $24
 $52
 $(139) $26
 $2,166
Cost of sales(757) (10) (10) 50
 (9) (736)
Cost of labor(513) (3) (16) 29
 (6) (509)
Occupancy and other(625) 3
 (15) 40
 (5) (602)
Restaurant profit$308
 $14
 $11
 $(20) $6
 $319
            

 2015 vs. 2014
Income / (Expense)2014 Store Portfolio Actions Other FX 2015
Company sales$2,440
 $56
 $46
 $(339) $2,203
Cost of sales(858) (27) 11
 117
 (757)
Cost of labor(568) (10) (15) 80
 (513)
Occupancy and other(703) (16) (1) 95
 (625)
Restaurant profit$311
 $3
 $41
 $(47) $308
          
margin percentage

In 2016,2019, the increasedecrease in Company sales, associated with store portfolio actions was driven by international net new unit growth, partially offset by refranchising. The increase in Restaurant profit associated with store portfolio actions was driven by international net new unit growth. Significant other factors impacting Company sales and/or Restaurant profit were company same-store sales growth of 2%, partially offset by wage inflation and higher commodity costs.

In 2015, the increase in Company sales and Restaurant profit associated with store portfolio actions was driven by international net new unit growth, partially offset by refranchising. Significant other factors impacting Company sales and/or Restaurant profit were company same-store sales growth of 2%.

Franchise and License Fees and Income

In 2016, the increase in Franchise and license fees and income, excluding the impacts of foreign currency translation and 53rd53rd week, was primarily driven by refranchising offset by company same-store sales growth of 5%, including lapping the prior year impact of supply interruptions in our KFC UK business.

The 2019 increase in Restaurant margin percentage was driven by same-store sales growth, including lapping the prior year impact of supply interruptions in our KFC UK business, and refranchising.

Franchise and property revenues

In 2019, the increase in Franchise and property revenues, excluding the impacts of foreign currency translation and 53rd week, was driven by international net new unit growth, franchise same-store sales growth of 3%4%, including lapping the prior year impact of supply interruptions in our KFC UK business, and refranchising.



G&A

In 2015,2019, the increase in Franchise and license fees and income, excluding the impact of foreign currency translation, was driven by international net new unit growth, franchise same-store sales growth of 1% and refranchising.

G&A, Expenses

In 2016, G&A expenses, excluding the impacts of foreign currency translation and 53rd53rd week, were even with prior year as the impact of higher compensation costs due to increased headcount and wage inflation in international markets and higher incentive compensation was offset by lower U.S. pension costs.

In 2015, the increase in G&A expenses, excluding the impact of foreign currency translation, was driven by higher expenses related to our deferred and incentive compensationincreased headcount programs, partially offset by the positive impact of YUM's Strategic Transformation Initiatives, including reductions in international markets and higher pension costs, including lapping the favorable resolution of a pension issue in the UK in 2014.


G&A directly attributable to refranchising.

Operating Profit

In 2016,2019, the increase in Operating Profit, excluding the impacts of foreign currency translation and 53rd53rd week, was driven by international net new unit growth, and same-store sales growth partially offset by higher restaurant operating costs and advertising contributions associated withlapping the KFC U.S. Acceleration Agreement.

In 2015, the increase in Operating Profit, excluding theprior year impact of foreign currency translation, was driven by same-store sales and international net new unit growth, partially offset by higher G&A expenses.supply interruptions in our KFC UK business.


Pizza Hut Division

The Pizza Hut Division has 16,40918,703 units, 53%61% of which are located outside the U.S. The Pizza Hut Division operates as one brand that uses multiple distribution channels including delivery, dine-in and express (e.g. airports). Emerging markets comprised approximately one-third of and includes units operating under both unitsthe Pizza Hut and profits for the Division as of the end of 2016.Telepizza brands. Additionally, 97%over 99% of the Pizza Hut Division units were operated by franchisees as of the end of 2016.2019.
       % B/(W) % B/(W)       % B/(W) % B/(W)
       2016 2015       2019 2018
 2016 2015 2014 Reported Ex FX 
Ex-FX and 53rd Week
 Reported Ex FX 2019 2018 2017 Reported Ex FX Ex FX and 53rd Week in 2019 Reported Ex FX
System Sales Growth (Decline)       
 2
 1
 (1) 3
 
Same-Store Sales Growth (Decline)       (1) N/A
 N/A
 
 N/A
 
System Sales $12,900
 $12,212
 $12,034
 6
 8
 7
 1
 1
 
Same-Store Sales Growth (Decline) %       Even N/A
 N/A Even N/A
 
                                  
Company sales $494
 $609
 $609
 (19) (17) (18) 
 3
  $54
 $69
 $285
 (23) (21) (21) (76) (76) 
Franchise and license fees and income 617
 605
 606
 2
 4
 3
 
 4
 
Franchise and property revenues 597
 598
 608
 Even 1
 1
 (2) (2) 
Franchise contributions for advertising and other services 376
 321
 
 17
 18
 16
 N/A N/A 
Total revenues $1,111
 $1,214
 $1,215
 (8) (7) (8) 
 3
  $1,027
 $988
 $893
 4
 5
 4
 11
 10
 
                                  
Restaurant profit $41
 $59
 $49
 (31) (31) (33) 20
 17
  $3
 $
 $14
 NM NM NM NM NM 
Restaurant margin % 8.3% 9.7% 8.1% (1.4)ppts. (1.6)ppts. (1.7)ppts. 1.6
ppts. 1.1
ppts. 4.2% (0.1)% 5.3% 4.3
ppts. 4.2
ppts. 4.1
ppts. (5.4)
ppts. (5.3)
ppts.
                                  
G&A expenses $241
 $272
 $253
 12
 10
 11
 (7) (13)  $202
 $197
 $211
 (2) (3) (2) 7
 7
 
Franchise and property expenses 39
 45
 68
 12
 11
 13
 35
 36
 
Franchise advertising and other services expense 367
 328
 
 (12) (12) (11) N/A N/A 
Operating Profit $370
 $347
 $347
 7
 9
 7
 
 2
  $369
 $348
 $341
 6
 8
 7
 2
 2
 

       % Increase (Decrease)       % Increase (Decrease)
Unit Count 2016 2015 2014 2016 2015 2019 2018 2017 2019 
2018(a)
Franchise 15,856
 15,304
 14,817
 4  3
 18,603
 18,369
 16,588
 1 11
Company-owned 553
 759
 788
 (27) (4) 100
 62
 160
 61 (61)
 16,409
 16,063
 15,605
 2  3
Total 18,703
 18,431
 16,748
 1 10


  2015 New Builds Closures Refranchised Acquired Other 2016
Franchise 15,304
 881
 (547) 218
 
 
 15,856
Company-owned 759
 45
 (33) (218) 
 
 553
Total 16,063
 926
 (580) 
 
 
 16,409

(a)    2018 unit growth includes units added as a result of our fourth quarter 2018 strategic alliance with Telepizza.


  2014 New Builds Closures Refranchised Acquired Other 2015
Franchise 14,817
 915
 (479) 90
 (44) 5
 15,304
Company-owned 788
 55
 (38) (90) 44
 
 759
Total 15,605
 970
 (517) 
 
 5
 16,063

Company Sales and Restaurant Profit

The changes in Company sales and Restaurant profit were as follows:
 2016 vs. 2015
Income / (Expense)2015 Store Portfolio Actions Other FX 
53rd Week
 2016
Company sales$609
 $(120) $10
 $(10) $5
 $494
Cost of sales(169) 34
 (3) 3
 (2) (137)
Cost of labor(190) 40
 (8) 3
 (1) (156)
Occupancy and other(191) 33
 (5) 4
 (1) (160)
Restaurant profit$59
 $(13) $(6) $
 $1
 $41
            

 2015 vs. 2014
Income / (Expense)2014 Store Portfolio Actions Other FX 2015
Company sales$609
 $22
 $(4) $(18) $609
Cost of sales(181) (6) 12
 6
 (169)
Cost of labor(189) (6) (1) 6
 (190)
Occupancy and other(190) (8) (1) 8
 (191)
Restaurant profit$49
 $2
 $6
 $2
 $59
          

In 2016,2019, the decrease in Company sales, and Restaurant profit associated with store portfolio actions was driven by refranchising. Significant other factors impacting Company sales and/or Restaurant profit were higher labor costs and increased advertising spend in the U.S., partially offset by company same-store sales growth of 2%.

In 2015, the increase in Company sales and Restaurant profit associated with store portfolio actions was driven by the impact of acquisitions in Canada and the U.S. and net new unit growth, partially offset by refranchising. Significant other factors impacting Company sales and/or Restaurant profit were commodity deflation, primarily in the U.S., partially offset by company same-store sales declines of 1%.

Franchise and License Fees and Income

In 2016, the increase in Franchise and license fees income, excluding the impacts of foreign currency translation and 53rd53rd week, was driven by net new unit growth, refranchising and higher fees from expiring development agreements, partially offset by franchiserefranchising. Company same-store sales declines ofgrowth was 2%.

Franchise and property revenues

In 2015,2019, the increase in Franchise and license fees and income,property revenues, excluding the impactimpacts of foreign currency translation and 53rd week, was driven by net new unit growth. Franchise same-store sales were even.


flat.

G&A Expenses

In 2016,2019, the decreaseincrease in G&A, expenses, excluding the impacts of foreign currency translation and 53rd53rd week, was driven by lower litigation settlement costs and legal fees, refranchising and lower U.S. pension costs, higher expenses related to our deferred compensation program,partially offset by higher incentive compensation costs.

In 2015, the increasepositive impact of YUM’s Strategic Transformation Initiatives, including reductions in G&A expenses, excluding the impact of foreign currency translation, was driven by strategic international investments and higher U.S. pension costs.directly attributable to refranchising.

Operating Profit

In 2016,2019, the increase in Operating Profit, excluding the impacts of foreign currency translation and 53rd53rd week, was driven by lower G&A expenses and net new unit growth, partially offset by franchise same-store sales declines.

In 2015,lapping advertising costs in the increase in Operating Profit, excludingprior year associated with the impact of foreign currency translation, was driven byPizza Hut Transformation Agreement (See Note 4), higher profit associated with providing incremental technology-related services, net new unit growth and lower commodity costs,refranchising, partially offset by higher provisions for past due receivables and higher G&A expenses.&A.


Taco Bell Division

The Taco Bell Division has 6,6047,363 units, the vast majority92% of which are in the U.S. The Company owns 14%Company-owned 7% of the Taco Bell units in the U.S., where as of the brand has historically achieved high restaurant margins and returns.end of 2019.
        % B/(W) % B/(W)
        2016 2015
  2016 2015 2014 Reported Ex FX 
Ex-FX and 53rd Week
 Reported Ex FX
System Sales Growth       6
  6
  4
  8
  8
 
Same-Store Sales Growth       2
  N/A
  N/A
  5
  N/A
 
Company sales $1,540
 $1,544
 $1,454
 
  
  (2)  6
  6
 
Franchise and license fees and income 485
 447
 411
 8
  9
  7
  9
  9
 
Total revenues $2,025
 $1,991
 $1,865
 2
  2
  
  7
  7
 
                      
Restaurant profit $342
 $342
 $274
 
  
  (2)  25
  25
 
Restaurant margin % 22.2% 22.2% 18.8% 
ppts. 
ppts. (0.1)ppts. 3.4
ppts. 3.4
ppts.
                      
G&A expenses $213
 $230
 $187
 7
  7
  8
  (23)  (23) 
Operating Profit $593
 $536
 $478
 11
  10
  8
  12
  12
 

        % Increase (Decrease)
Unit Count 2016 2015 2014 2016 2015
Franchise 5,719
 5,507
 5,273
 4  4
Company-owned 885
 900
 933
 (2) (4)
  6,604
 6,407

6,206
 3  3

  2015 New Builds Closures Refranchised Acquired Other 2016
Franchise 5,507
 260
 (94) 46
 (1) 1
 5,719
Company-owned 900
 34
 (4) (46) 1
 
 885
Total 6,407
 294
 (98) 
 
 1
 6,604
        % B/(W) % B/(W)
        2019 2018
  2019 2018 2017 Reported Ex FX Ex FX and 53rd Week in 2019 Reported Ex FX
System Sales $11,784
 $10,786
 $10,145
 9
  9
  8
  6
  6
 
Same-Store Sales Growth %       5
  N/A
  N/A  4
  N/A
 
Company sales $921
 $1,037
 $1,359
 (11)  (11)  (13)  (24)  (24) 
Franchise and property revenues 673
 590
 521
 14
  14
  12
  13
  13
 
Franchise contributions for advertising and other services 485
 429
 
 13
  13
  11
  N/A  N/A 
Total revenues $2,079
 $2,056
 $1,880
 1
  1
  
  9
  9
 
                      
Restaurant profit $221
 $244
 $305
 (9)  (9)  (11)  (20)  (20) 
Restaurant margin % 24.0% 23.5% 22.4% 0.5
ppts. 0.5
ppts. 0.4
ppts. 1.1
ppts. 1.1
ppts.
                      
G&A expenses $181
 $177
 $188
 (2)  (3)  (2)  6
  6
 
Franchise and property expenses 38
 28
 22
 (33)  (33)  (32)  (31)  (31) 
Franchise advertising and other services expense 481
 428
 
 (12)  (12)  (11)  N/A  N/A 
Operating Profit $683
 $633
 $619
 8
  8
  6
  2
  2
 



 2014 New Builds Closures Refranchised Acquired Other 2015       % Increase (Decrease)
Unit Count 2019 2018 2017 2019 2018
Franchise 5,273
 240
 (80) 65
 
 9
 5,507
 6,895
 6,602
 6,196
 4  7
Company-owned 933
 37
 (5) (65) 
 
 900
 468
 470
 653
   (28)
Total 6,206
 277
 (85) 
 
 9
 6,407
 7,363
 7,072

6,849
 4  3

Company Sales and Restaurant Profit

The changes in Company sales and Restaurant profit were as follows:
 2016 vs. 2015
Income / (Expense)2015 Store Portfolio Actions Other 
53rd Week
 2016
Company sales$1,544
 $(37) $9
 $24
 $1,540
Cost of sales(422) 11
 21
 (6) (396)
Cost of labor(428) 10
 (19) (7) (444)
Occupancy and other(352) 7
 (9) (4) (358)
Restaurant profit$342
 $(9) $2
 $7
 $342
          
 2015 vs. 2014
Income / (Expense)2014 Store Portfolio Actions Other 2015
Company sales$1,454
 $39
 $51
 $1,544
Cost of sales(432) (10) 20
 (422)
Cost of labor(414) (13) (1) (428)
Occupancy and other(334) (11) (7) (352)
Restaurant profit$274
 $5
 $63
 $342
        
margin percentage

In 2016,2019, the decrease in Company sales and Restaurant profit associated with store portfolio actionsSales, excluding the impact of 53rd week, was driven by refranchising partially offset by net new unit growth. Significant other factors impacting Company sales and/or Restaurant profit were company same-store sales growth of 1% and favorable commodity costs, partially offset by higher labor costs and store-level investments.

In 2015, the increase in Company sales and Restaurant profit associated with store portfolio actions was driven by net new unit growth. Significant other factors impacting Company sales and/or Restaurant profit were company same-store sales growth of 4% and net new unit growth.

In 2019, the increase in restaurant margin percentage was driven by same-store sales growth partially offset by higher labor and commodity deflation.costs.

Franchise and License Fees and Incomeproperty revenues

In 2016,2019, the increase in Franchise and license fees and income,property revenues, excluding the impactsimpact of foreign currency translation and the 53rd53rd week, was driven by net new unit growth, franchise same-store sales growth of 2% and refranchising.

In 2015, the increase in Franchise and license fees and income was driven by franchise same-store sales growth of 5%, refranchising and net new unit growth and lapping franchise incentives provided in the first quarter of 2014 related to the national launch of breakfast.growth.

G&A Expenses

In 2016, the decrease in G&A expenses was driven by lower U.S. pension costs, lapping the Live Más Scholarship contribution, and lower litigation costs.

In 2015,2019, the increase in G&A, expensesexcluding the impact of 53rd week, was driven by higher expenses related to our deferred and incentive compensation costs, investment spending on strategic growth and technology initiatives, higher U.S. pension costs, higher litigation costsprograms and the creationunfavorable impact of lapping prior year forfeitures related to share based compensation awards, partially offset by the Live Más Scholarship.


positive impact of YUM’s Strategic Transformation Initiatives.

Operating Profit

In 2016,2019, the increase in Operating Profit, excluding the impacts of foreign currency translation and 53rd53rd week, was driven by same-store sales growth, net new unit growth and lower G&A expenses, partially offset by higher restaurant operating costs and refranchising.

In 2015, the increase in Operating Profit was driven by same-store sales growth and net new unit growth, partially offset by refranchising and higher G&A expenses.

restaurant operating costs.

Corporate & Unallocated
        % B/(W)
Income/(Expense) 2016 2015 2014 2016 2015
Corporate G&A expenses $(316) $(196) $(189) (62)  (3) 
Unallocated Franchise and license fees and income (2) 
 
 NM
  NM
 
Unallocated Franchise and license expenses (24) (71) 
 67
  NM
 
Refranchising gain (loss) (See Note 5) 141
 (23) 16
 NM
  NM
 
Unallocated Other income (expense) (11) (23) (11) 47
  NM
 
Interest expense, net (307) (141) (143) NM
  1
 
Income tax provision (See Note 18) (324) (325) (368) 
  11
 
Effective tax rate (See Note 18) 24.6% 25.8% 26.7% 1.2
ppts. 0.9
ppts.
        % B/(W)
(Expense)/Income 2019 2018 2017 2019 2018
Corporate and unallocated G&A $(188) $(171) $(230) (10)  26
 
Unallocated restaurant costs 
 3
 10
 (95)  (69) 
Unallocated Franchise and property revenues 
 
 (5) NM
  NM
 
Unallocated Franchise and property expenses (14) (8) (30) (72)  73
 
Refranchising gain (loss) (See Note 4) 37
 540
 1,083
 (93)  (50) 
Unallocated Other income (expense) (See Note 4) (9) (8) (8) NM
  NM
 
Investment income (expense), net (See Note 4) (67) 9
 5
 NM
  88
 
Other pension income (expense) (See Note 14) (4) (14) (47) 71
  70
 
Interest expense, net (486) (452) (445) (8)  (1) 
Income tax provision (See Note 17) (79) (297) (934) 74
  68
 
Effective tax rate (See Note 17) 5.7% 16.2% 41.1% 10.5
ppts. 24.9
ppts.

Corporate and unallocated G&A Expenses

In 2016,2019, the increase in Corporate G&A expenses was driven by incremental costs associated with YUM's Strategic Transformation Initiatives (See Note 5), non-cash charges associated with the modification of certain Executive Income Deferral (“EID”) share-based compensation awards (See Note 5 ), Retirement plan settlement charges (See Note 5) and higher incentive compensation costs, partially offset by lower professional and legal fees.

In 2015, the increase in Corporateunallocated G&A expenses was driven by higher pension costs.expenses related to our deferred and incentive compensation programs and higher professional fees related to strategic projects, the largest of which was related to global tax reforms, partially offset by lapping costs associated with YUM’s Strategic Transformation Initiatives (See Note 4) and current year G&A reductions due to the impact of YUM’s Strategic Transformation Initiatives.



Unallocated restaurant costs

Unallocated restaurant costs represents the cessation of depreciation on held for sale assets that were not allocated to the Division segments.

Unallocated Franchise and License fees and incomeproperty expenses

In 2016, Unallocated Franchise and license fees and income reflectsproperty expenses reflect charges related to the Pizza Hut U.S. Transformation Agreement and/or the KFC U.S. Acceleration Agreement. See Note 5.

Unallocated Franchise and License expenses

In 2016 and 2015, Unallocated Franchise and license expenses reflect charges related to the KFC U.S. Acceleration Agreement. See Note 5.

Unallocated Other Income (Expense)

In 2016, Unallocated Other (income) expense primarily includes write-downs related to our decision to dispose of our corporate aircraft and foreign exchange losses. See Note 8.

In 2015 and 2014, Unallocated Other (income) expense primarily includes foreign exchange losses.4.

Interest Expense, Netexpense, net

The increase in interestInterest expense, net for 20162019 was driven by increased outstanding borrowings. See Note 11.10.

The decrease in interest expense, net for 2015 was driven by lower effective interest rates on outstanding borrowings, partially offset by increased short-term borrowings.



Income Tax Provision

See Note 18 for discussion of our income tax provision.

Income from Discontinued Operations, Net of Tax

The following table is a summary of the operating results of the China business which have been reflected in discontinued operations. See Note 4 for additional information.
  
2016(a)
 2015 2014
Total revenues $5,776
 $6,909
 $6,934
Total income from discontinued operations before income taxes(b)(c)
 571
 526
 53
Income tax (benefit) provision(c)(d)
 (65) 164
 38
Income from discontinued operations, net of tax(c)
 625
 357
 45

(a)Includes Yum China financial results from January 1, 2016 to October 31, 2016.

(b)Includes costs incurred to execute the Separation of $68 million and $9 million for 2016 and 2015, respectively. Such costs primarily relate to transaction advisors, legal and other consulting fees.

(c)During 2014, we recorded a $463 million non-cash impairment charge related to China's investment in the Little Sheep restaurant business. The tax benefit associated with these losses of $76 million and the losses allocated to the noncontrolling founding shareholder of $26 million resulted in a net impact of $361 million on Income from discontinued operations, net of tax.

(d)During 2016, we recorded a tax benefit of $233 million related to previously recorded losses associated with China's Little Sheep business. The tax benefit associated with these losses was able to be recognized as a result of legal entity restructuring completed in anticipation of the China spin-off.


37



Consolidated Cash Flows

Net cash provided by operating activities from continuing operations was $1,204$1,315 million in 2016 versus $1,2132019 compared to $1,176 million in 2015.2018.  The decreaseincrease was primarilylargely driven by an increase in interestOperating profit before Special Items and lower compensation payments, partially offset by a decreasean increase in income taxinterest payments.

In 2015, net cash provided by operating activities from continuing operations was $1,213 million compared to $1,217 million in 2014. The decrease was primarily driven by higher pension contributions, offset by lapping higher income tax payments in the prior year.

Net cash used in investing activities from continuing operations was $24$88 million in 20162019 compared to $189net cash provided by investing activities of $313 million in 2015.2018.  The decreasechange was primarily driven by higherlower refranchising proceeds in the current year, partially offset by the lapping of our prior year investment in Grubhub common stock and lower capital spending.

In 2015, net cash used in investing activities from continuing operations was $189 million compared to $424 million in 2014. The decrease was primarily driven by higher refranchising proceedsthe acquisition of QuikOrder, LLC, an online ordering software and lower capital spending.service provider for the restaurant industry ("QuikOrder") (See Note 9).

Net cash used in financing activities from continuing operations was $677$938 million in 20162019 compared to $1,058$2,620 million in 2015.2018. The decrease was primarily driven by higher proceeds from net borrowings, partially offset by higher share repurchases.

In 2015, net cash used in financing activities from continuing operations was $1,058 million compared to $739 million in 2014. The increase was primarily driven by higherlower share repurchases and dividends, partially offset by higher net borrowings.borrowings in 2019.

Consolidated Financial Condition

During 2016, we issued $6.9 billion in new debtOur Consolidated Balance Sheet was impacted by the adoption of Topic 842 (See Note 2) and repaid $1.6 billiondeferred tax assets recorded related to the intercompany transfers of borrowings that were outstanding as of December 26, 2015. Seecertain intellectual property rights (See Note 11 for detail on these debt issuances and repayments. Shareholders’ Equity (Deficit) declined $6.6 billion due primarily to share repurchases of $5.4 billion and the spin-off of our China business.17).

Liquidity and Capital Resources

In October 2015, we announcedOur primary sources of liquidity are cash on hand, cash generated by operations and availability under our intent to separate our former China business into an independent publicly-traded company and become more of a pure play franchisor with more stable earnings, higher profit margins, lower capital requirements and stronger cash flow conversion. Additionally, we announced our intention to return substantial capital to shareholders, the majority of which was to be funded by incremental borrowings. Since the fourth quarter of 2015, through December 31, 2016, we have repurchased 79 million shares of our Common Stock for $6.3 billion, including $5.4 billion in 2016. Over the same period, we have paid cash dividends of $942 million, including $744 million in 2016, for a total return to shareholders of $7.2 billion.

 Number of Common Shares Repurchased Value of Common Shares Repurchased Average Price Paid Per Share Dividends Paid Total Return to Shareholders
Fourth Quarter 201511
 $830
 $72.64
 $198
 $1,028
First Quarter 201613
 925
 69.68
 192
 1,117
Second Quarter 20169
 740
 81.98
 187
 927
Third Quarter 201624
 2,092
 87.12
 179
 2,271
Fourth Quarter 2016 - pre-Separation13
 1,115
 89.15
 
 1,115
Fourth Quarter 2016 - post-Separation(a)
9
 576
 62.90
 186
 762
 79
 $6,278
   $942
 $7,220

(a)Includes the effect of $45 million in share repurchases (0.7 million shares) with trade dates prior to December 31, 2016 but settlement dates subsequent to December 31, 2016.

See Note 17 for additional details related to our share repurchase activity.

We completed $6.9 billion of debt financing transactions during 2016 to assist in funding the shareholder returns noted above.revolving facilities.  As of December 31, 2016, approximately 90%, including the impact of interest rate swaps, of our $9.1 billion of total debt outstanding is fixed with an effective overall interest rate of approximately 4.7%. We have transitioned to non-investment grade credit ratings


of BB (Standard & Poor's)/Ba3 (Moody's) with a balance sheet more consistent with highly-levered peer restaurant franchise companies. We are now managing a capital structure which is levered in-line with our target of approximately five times EBITDA, and which2019, we believe provides an attractive balance between optimized interest rates, duration and flexibility with diversified sources of liquidity and maturities spread over multiple years. See Note 11 for details of our financing activities supporting the return of capital initiative.

In October 2016, we announced YUM’s Strategic Transformation Initiatives to drive global expansion of the KFC, Pizza Hut and Taco Bell brands following the Separation on October 31, 2016. As part of this transformation we intend to own less than 1,000 stores by the end of 2018 and, by 2019, reduce annual run-rate capital expenditures to approximately $100 million, improve our efficiency by lowering G&A expenses to 1.7% of system sales and increase free cash flow conversion to 100%.

Over the next 3 years, we intend to return an additional $6.5 to $7.0 billion to shareholders through share repurchaseshad Cash and cash dividends. We intendequivalents of $605 million.  Cash and cash equivalents increased from $292 million at December 31, 2018 due to fund these additional shareholder returns through a combinationthe issuance of free cash flow generation, refranchising proceeds and maintenance$800 million aggregate principal amount of our five times EBITDA leverage. We anticipate generating proceedsYUM Senior Unsecured Notes in excess of $2 billion, net of tax, through the refranchising of over 2,000 stores.

September 2019. We have historically generated substantial cash flows from the operations of our company-ownedCompany-owned stores and from our extensive franchise operations, which require a limited YUM investment. Our annual operating cash flows from continuing operations have approximated $1.2 billion eachhistorically been in excess of the past three years. Going forward, we anticipate that any decrease$1 billion. Decreases in operating cash flows from the operation of fewer Company-owned stores due to refranchising willin recent years have been offset, and are expected to continue to be offset, with savings generated from decreased capital investment and G&A expense required to support company operations. To the extent operating cash flows plus other sources of cash such as refranchising proceeds do not cover our anticipated cash needs, we maintain a $1 billion Revolving Facility under our existing Credit Agreement that was undrawn as of undrawnyear end 2019. We believe that our existing cash on hand, cash from operations and availability under our Revolving Facility, will be sufficient to fund our operations, anticipated capital expenditures and debt repayment obligations over the next twelve months.

From 2017 through 2019, we returned a cumulative $6.5 billion to shareholders through share repurchases and cash dividends. We funded these shareholder returns through a combination of refranchising proceeds, free cash flow generation and maintenance of our ~5.0x EBITDA leverage. From the fourth quarter of 2016 to the end of 2018, we generated total gross refranchising proceeds of $2.8 billion in connection with our initiative to increase franchise ownership to 98%. Going forward, we anticipate refranchising proceeds to be much more limited and any shareholder returns we choose to make to be funded through cash flows from operations and leverage maintenance. 

On January 6, 2020, we announced our definitive agreement pursuant to which the Company will acquire all of the issued and outstanding common shares of The Habit Restaurants, Inc. (“Habit”) for $14 per share in cash or a total of approximately $375 million. The transaction is subject to approval by Habit’s stockholders and other customary closing conditions. The transaction is expected to be completed by the end of the first-quarter of 2020.



Additionally, if the transaction is consummated, Habit will make payment to certain of its former shareholders pursuant to an existing Tax Receivable Agreement in the aggregate amount of approximately $53 million.  The amount of this payment in excess of Habit’s cash necessary at closing for normal working capital purposes, in addition to customary transaction fees and expenses, will be liabilities funded by the Company.

We intend to fund all amounts for the acquisition of Habit using cash on hand and available borrowing capacity under our existing revolving credit facility.Revolving Facility.

OurOur balance sheet often reflects a working capital deficit, which is not uncommon in our industry and is also historically common for YUM. Company sales are paid in cash or by credit card (which is quickly converted into cash) and ourOur royalty receivables from franchisees are generally due within 30 days of the period in which the related sales occur.occur and Company sales are paid in cash or by credit card (which is quickly converted into cash). Substantial amounts of cash received have historically been either returned to shareholders or invested in new restaurant assets which are non-current in nature or returned to shareholders.nature. As part of our working capital strategy, we negotiate favorable credit terms with vendors and, as a result, our on-hand inventory turns faster than the related short-term liabilities. Accordingly, it is not unusual for current liabilities to exceed current assets. We believe such a deficit has no significant impact on our liquidity or operations.

Debt Instruments

As of December 31, 2019, approximately 92%, including the impact of interest rate swaps, of our $10.6 billion of total debt outstanding, excluding finance leases, is fixed with an effective overall interest rate of approximately 4.7%. We generateare managing a significant amountcapital structure which is levered in-line with our target of cash from operating activities outside~5.0x EBITDA, and which we believe provides an attractive balance between optimized interest rates, duration and flexibility with diversified sources of liquidity and maturities spread over multiple years. We have credit ratings of BB (Standard & Poor's)/Ba2 (Moody's) with a balance sheet consistent with highly-levered peer restaurant franchise companies.

The following table summarizes the U.S. that we have used historically to fundfuture maturities of our international development. To the extent we have needed to repatriate international cash to fund our U.S. discretionary cash spending, including returns to shareholdersoutstanding long-term debt, excluding finance leases and debt repayments, we have historically been able to do so in a tax-efficient manner. If we experience an unforeseen decrease in our cash flows from our U.S. businesses or are unable to refinance future U.S. debt maturities we may be required to repatriate future international earnings at tax rates higher than we have historically experienced.issuance costs and discounts, as of December 31, 2019.

Borrowing Capacity
  2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2030 2037 2043 Total
Securitization Notes $29
 $29
 $29
 $1,281
 $16
 $16
 $921
 $6
 $571
       $2,898
Credit Agreement 51
 76
 395
 20
 20
 1,836
             2,398
Subsidiary Senior Unsecured Notes         1,050
   1,050
 750
         2,850
YUM Senior Unsecured Notes 350
 350
   325
           800
 325
 275
 2,425
Total $430
 $455
 $424
 $1,626
 $1,086
 $1,852
 $1,971
 $756
 $571
 $800
 $325
 $275
 $10,571

Securitization Notes. NotesIn May 2016, include four senior secured notes issued by Taco Bell Funding, LLC a newly formed(the “Issuer”) totaling $2.9 billion with fixed interest rates ranging from 4.318% to 4.970%.  The Securitization Notes are secured by substantially all of the assets of the Issuer and the Issuer’s special purpose, subsidiarywholly-owned subsidiaries (collectively with the Issuer, the "Securitization Entities"), and include a lien on all existing and future U.S. Taco Bell franchise and license agreements and the royalties payable thereunder, existing and future U.S. Taco Bell intellectual property, certain transaction accounts and a pledge of the Company, issued an aggregate of $2.3 billion of fixed rate senior secured notes (“Class A-2 Notes”). In connection with the issuance of the Class A-2 Notes, Taco Bell Funding, LLC also issued variable rate notes (the “Variable Funding Notes” and, together with the Class A-2 Notes, the “Securitization Notes”) pursuant to a new revolving financing facility, which allows for the borrowing of up to $100 million including the issuance of letters of credit up to $50 million. We have no outstanding borrowings related to the Variable Funding Notes and have $15 millionequity interests in letters of credit outstanding as of December 31, 2016 related to this facility.asset-owning Securitization Entities.  The Securitization Notes contain cross-default provisions whereby the failure to pay principal on any outstanding Securitization Notes will constitute an event of default under any other Securitization Notes.

The Company used certainCredit Agreement includes senior secured credit facilities consisting of the proceeds from the sale of the Class A-2 Notes to pay down the entire outstanding balance of $2 billion of its Unsecured Short-terma $463 million Term Loan Credit Facility ("BridgeA facility (the “Term Loan A Facility"), at which time the Bridge Facility was terminated, as well as to pay related feesa $1.9 billion Term Loan B facility (the “Term Loan B Facility”) and expenses and fund certain accounts related to the Securitization Notes. The remaining proceeds of the Securitization Notes were used to return capital to shareholders through share repurchases and for general corporate purposes.

Credit Agreement. In June 2016, three wholly-owned subsidiaries of the Company,a $1.0 billion revolving facility (the “Revolving Facility”) issued by KFC Holding Co., Pizza Hut Holdings, LLC and Taco Bell of America, LLC, each of which is a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company, as co-borrowers (the "Borrowers") entered into a new credit agreement (the “Credit Agreement”) providing for (i) a $500 million Term Loan A facility (the “Term Loan A Facility”), (ii) a $2 billion Term Loan B facility (the “Term Loan B Facility”) and (iii) a $1 billion revolving facility (the “Revolving Facility”) which has no outstanding borrowings


and has $5 million in letters of credit outstanding. Our Revolving Facility was undrawn as of December 31, 2016, each2019.  The interest rates applicable to the Credit Agreement range from 1.25% to 1.75% plus LIBOR or from 0.25% to 0.75% plus the Base Rate, at the Borrowers’ election, based upon the total net leverage ratio of which may be increased subject to certain conditions.the Borrowers and the Specified Guarantors (as defined in the Credit Agreement).  Our Term Loan A Facility and Term Loan B Facility contain cross-default provisions whereby the failure to pay principal of or otherwise perform any agreement or condition under indebtedness of certain subsidiaries with a principal amount in excess of $100 million will constitute an event of default under the Credit Agreement.

Subsidiary Senior Unsecured Notes. NotesOn June 16, 2016, include three senior unsecured notes issued by the Borrowersissued an aggregate of $1.05 totaling $2.9 billion Senior Unsecured Notes due 2024 and an aggregate of $1.05 billion Senior Unsecured Notes due 2026 (together, the “Subsidiary Senior Unsecured Notes”)with fixed interest rates ranging from 4.75% to 5.25%.  Our Subsidiary Senior Unsecured Notes contain cross-default provisions whereby


the acceleration of the maturity of the indebtedness of certain subsidiaries with a principal amount in excess of $100 million or the failure to pay principal of such indebtedness will constitute an event of default under the Subsidiary Senior Unsecured Notes.

We used certain of the proceeds from the Subsidiary Senior Unsecured Notes and the Term Loan A Facility and the Term Loan B Facility to repay all outstanding amounts under our senior unsecured revolving credit facility (the “Senior Unsecured Revolving Credit Facility”) which had outstanding borrowings of $701 million as of December 26, 2015. Concurrent with this repayment the Senior Unsecured Revolving Credit Facility was terminated. The remaining proceeds are being used to return capital to shareholders through share repurchases and for general corporate purposes.

The majority of our remaining long-term debt primarily comprises Senior, unsecured obligations ("YUM Senior Unsecured Notes") which ranks equally in right of payment with all of our existing and future unsecured unsubordinated indebtedness. The YUM Senior Unsecured Notes have varying maturity dates from 2018 through 2043 and statedinclude six senior unsecured notes issued by Yum! Brands, Inc. totaling $2.4 billion with fixed interest rates ranging from 3.75% to 6.88%. Amounts outstanding under YUM Senior Unsecured Notes were $2.2 billion at December 31, 2016. including $800 million aggregate principal amount of 4.75% notes due January 15, 2030 that we issued on September 11, 2019.  See Note 10 for additional details. Our YUM Senior Unsecured Notes contain cross-default provisions whereby the acceleration of the maturity of any of our indebtedness in aor the failure to pay principal amount in excess of $50 millionsuch indebtedness will constitute aan event of default under the YUM Senior Unsecured Notes unless such indebtedness is discharged, or the acceleration of the maturity of that indebtedness is annulled, within 30 days after notice.

The following table summarizes the future maturities of our outstanding long-term debt, excluding capital leases, as of December 31, 2016.
  2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2037 2043 Total
Securitization Notes $23
 $23
 $23
 $789
 $15
 $15
 $479
 $10
 $10
 $907
     $2,294
Credit Agreement 32
 45
 51
 76
 395
 20
 1,871
           2,490
Subsidiary Senior Unsecured Notes               1,050
   1,050
     2,100
YUM Senior Unsecured Notes   325
 250
 350
 350
   325
       325
 275
 2,200
Total $55
 $393
 $324
 $1,215
 $760
 $35
 $2,675
 $1,060
 $10
 $1,957
 $325
 $275
 $9,084

As a result of issuingSee Note 10 for details on the Securitization Notes, and the Credit Agreement, Subsidiary Senior Unsecured Notes and executing the Credit Agreement we have completed our recapitalization plan. Full year 2016 interest expense was $333 million and we currently expect annualized interest expense of approximately $430 million based on existing debt levels and current interest rates on our variable-rate debt.

See Note 11 for details on the the Securitization Notes, SubsidiaryYUM Senior Unsecured Notes the Credit Agreement and YUM Senior Unsecured Notes..

Contractual Obligations

Our significant contractual obligations and payments as of December 31, 20162019 included:

  Total Less than 1 Year 1-3 Years 3-5 Years More than 5 Years
Long-term debt obligations(a)
 $12,304
 $462
 $1,481
 $2,628
 $7,733
Capital leases(b)
 181
 16
 31
 29
 105
Operating leases(b)
 1,204
 171
 276
 186
 571
Purchase obligations(c)
 417
 273
 115
 28
 1
Benefit plans(d)
 249
 120
 38
 28
 63
Total contractual obligations $14,355
 $1,042
 $1,941
 $2,899
 $8,473


  Total Less than 1 Year 1-3 Years 3-5 Years More than 5 Years
Long-term debt obligations(a)
 $13,911
 $895
 $1,804
 $3,505
 $7,707
Finance leases(b)
 110
 11
 20
 17
 62
Operating leases(b)
 987
 105
 192
 159
 531
Purchase obligations(c)
 297
 159
 124
 13
 1
Benefit plans and other(d)
 290
 155
 32
 30
 73
Total contractual obligations $15,595
 $1,325
 $2,172
 $3,724
 $8,374

(a)Amounts include maturities of debt outstanding as of December 31, 20162019 and expected interest payments on those outstanding amounts on a nominal basis.  The estimated interest payments related to the variable rate portion of our debt is based on current LIBOR interest rates. See Note 11.10.

(b)These obligations, which are shown on a nominal basis and represent the non-cancellable term of the lease, relate primarily to approximately 2,000 company-owned restaurants.600 Company-owned restaurants and 400 units that we sublease land, building or both to our franchisees.  See Note 12.11.

(c)Purchase obligations include agreements to purchase goods or services that are enforceable and legally binding on us and that specify all significant terms, including: fixed or minimum quantities to be purchased; fixed, minimum or variable price provisions; and the approximate timing of the transaction.  We have excluded agreements that are cancelablecancellable without penalty.  Purchase obligations relate primarily to supply agreements, marketing, information technology purchases of property, plant and equipment ("PP&E") as well as consulting, maintenance and othersupply agreements.

(d)Includes actuarially-determined timing of payments from our most significant unfunded pension plan as well as scheduled payments from our deferred compensation plan and other unfunded benefit plans where payment dates are determinable. This table excludes $37$40 million of future benefit payments for deferred compensation and other unfunded benefit plans to be paid upon separation of employee's service or retirement from the company, as we cannot reasonably estimate the dates of these future cash payments. Other amounts include a cash tax obligation related to an income tax audit expected to conclude in 2020 and anticipated investments related to the Pizza Hut U.S. Transformation Agreement (See Note 4).

We sponsor noncontributory defined benefit pension plans covering certain salaried and hourly employees, the most significant of which are in the U.S. and UK.  The most significant of the U.S. plans, the YUM Retirement Plan (the “Plan”), is funded while benefits from our other significant U.S. plan are paid by the Company as incurred (see footnote (d) above).  Our funding policy for the Plan is to contribute annually amounts that will at least equal the minimum amounts required to comply with the Pension Protection Act of 2006.  However, additional voluntary contributions are made from time-to-time to improve the Plan’s funded status.  At December 31, 20162019 the Plan was in a net underfunded position of $58$44 million.  The UK pension plans were in a net overfunded position of $44$82 million at our 20162019 measurement date.

We do not anticipate making any significant contributions to the Plan in 2017.2020. Investment performance and corporate bond rates have a significant effect on our net funding position as they drive our asset balances and discount rate assumptions.  Future changes


in investment performance and corporate bond rates could impact our funded status and the timing and amounts of required contributions in 20172020 and beyond.

Our post-retirement health care plan in the U.S. is not required to be funded in advance, but is pay as you go.  We made post-retirement benefit payments of $5 million in 20162019 and no future funding amounts are included in the contractual obligations table.  See Note 15.14.

We have excluded from the contractual obligations table payments we may make for exposures for which we are self-insured, including workers’ compensation, employment practices liability, general liability, automobile liability, product liability and property losses (collectively “property and casualty losses”) and employee healthcare and long-term disability claims.  The majority of our recorded liability for self-insured property and casualty losses and employee healthcare and long-term disability claims represents estimated reserves for incurred claims that have yet to be filed or settled.

We have not included in the contractual obligations table approximately $4$56 million of liabilities for unrecognized tax benefits relating to various tax positions we have taken.  These liabilities may increase or decrease over time as a result of tax examinations, and given the status of the examinations, we cannot reliably estimate the period of any cash settlement with the respective taxing authorities.  These liabilities exclude amounts that are temporary in nature and for which we anticipate that over time there will be no net cash outflow.

As discussed further in Note 19, on January 29, 2020 we received an order from the Special Director of the Directorate of Enforcement in India imposing a penalty on Yum! Restaurants India Private Limited of approximately Indian Rupee 11 billion, or approximately $156 million, primarily relating to alleged violations of operating conditions imposed in 1993 and 1994. We have excludedbeen advised by external counsel that the order is flawed and that several options for appeal exist. We deny liability and intend to continue vigorously defending this matter. We do not consider the risk of any significant loss arising from this order to be probable and thus have not recorded any reserve at December 31, 2019. It is possible that we could be required to post a deposit for some or all portion of the penalty amount as we pursue appeal options. We have not included any potential deposit amount in the contractual obligations table certain commitments associated with the KFC U.S. Acceleration Agreement (See Note 5) as we cannot reliably estimate the specific timing or amount of the remaining investments toany such deposit that may be made in each of the next two years. In connection with this agreement we anticipate investing a total of approximately $120 million from 2015 through 2018 primarily to fund new back-of-house equipment for franchisees and to provide incentives to accelerate franchisee store remodels, of which $98 million has been invested through 2016.required.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

See the Lease Guarantees and Franchise Loan Pool and Equipment Guarantees sectionssection of Note 2019 for discussion of our off-balance sheet arrangements.


41



New Accounting Pronouncements Not Yet Adopted

In May 2014,June 2016, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB"(“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update ("ASU") No. 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606), to provide principles within a single framework for revenue recognition of transactionsinvolving contracts with customers across all industries. The standard allows for either a full retrospective or modified retrospective transition method. In March and April 2016, the FASB issued the following amendments to clarify the implementation of ASU 2014-09: ASU No. 2016-08, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606): Principal versus Agent Considerations (Reporting Revenue Gross versus Net) and ASU No. 2016-10 Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606): Identifying Performance Obligations and Licensing. We intend to adopt the new standards using the full retrospective transition method in the first quarter of 2018.

We do not believe these standards will impact the recognition of our two largest sources of revenue, sales in company-owned restaurants and sales-based continuing fees from franchisees. Additionally, we do not expect the new standards will materially impact the recognition of refranchising gains and losses as these transactions are divestitures of businesses and thus outside the scope of the standards. See Note 2 for a description of our current accounting policies.

The standards require that the transaction price received from customers be allocated to each separate and distinct performance obligation. The transaction price attributable to each separate and distinct performance obligation is then recognized as the performance obligations are satisfied. We are currently evaluating the standards to determine whether the services we provide related to upfront fees we receive from franchisees such as initial or renewal fees contain separate and distinct performance obligations from the franchise right. If we determine these services are not separate and distinct from the overall franchise right, the fees received will be recognized as revenue over the term of each respective franchise agreement. We currently recognize upfront franchise fees such as initial and renewal fees when the related services have been provided, which is when a store opens for initial fees and when renewal options become effective for renewal fees. The standards require the unamortized portion of fees received to be presented in our Consolidated Balance Sheets as a contract liability. Any contract liabilities required to be recorded as a result of adopting these standards may be material to our Consolidated Balance Sheets given the volume of our franchise agreements and their duration, which is typically equal to or in excess of ten years.

Similarly, we are currently evaluating whether the benefits we receive from incentive payments we may make to our franchisees (e.g. equipment funding provided under the KFC U.S. Acceleration Agreement, see Note 5) are separate and distinct from the benefits we receive from the franchise right. If they cannot be separated from the franchise right then such incentive payments would be amortized as a reduction of revenue over the term of the franchise agreement. Currently, we recognize any payments made to franchisees within our Consolidated Statements of Income when we are obligated to make the payment.

We are also evaluating whether the standards will have an impact on transactions currently not included in our revenues such as franchisee contributions to and subsequent expenditures from advertising cooperatives that we are required to consolidate. We act as an agent in regard to these franchisee contributions and expenditures and as such we do not currently include them in our Consolidated Statements of Income or Cash Flows. See Note 2 for details. We are evaluating whether the new standards will impact the principal/agent determinations in these arrangements. If we determine we are the principal in these arrangements we would include contributions to and expenditures from these advertising cooperatives within our Consolidated Statements of Income and Cash Flows. While any such change has the potential to materially impact our gross amount of reported revenues and expenses, such impact would largely be offsetting and we would not expect there to be a significant impact on our reported Net Income.

In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-02, Leases (Topic 842), which increases transparency and comparability among organizations by requiring that substantially all lease assets and liabilities be recognized on the balance sheet and disclosing key information about leasing arrangements. ASU 2016-02 is effective for the Company in our first quarter of fiscal 2019 with early adoption permitted. The standard must be adopted using a modified retrospective transition approach for leases existing at, or entered into after, the beginning of the earliest comparative period presented in the financial statements. We currently plan to adopt ASU 2016-02 in the first quarter of 2019 and we are evaluating the impact the adoption of this standard will have on our Financial Statements. Based on our current volume of store leases and subleases (See Note 12) to franchisees we expect this adoption will result in a material increase in the assets and liabilities on our Consolidated Balance Sheets; however, we believe the impact will be less material over time as we execute our strategy to be at least 98% franchised by 2019 and thus are a party to fewer leases. Further, we do not anticipate adoption will have a significant impact on our Consolidated Statements of Income or Cash Flows.

In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-09, Compensation - Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting, which is intended to simplify several aspects of the accounting for employee share-based payment transactions, including their income tax consequences, classification of awards as either equity or liabilities andclassification on the statement of cash flows. ASU 2016-09 is effective for the Company in our first quarter of fiscal 2017. Upon adoption of this standard, excess tax benefits associated with share-based compensation, whichwe currently recognize within


Common Stock, will be reflected within the Income tax provision in our Consolidated Statementsof Income. Additionally, our Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows will present such excess tax benefits, which are currentlypresented as a financing activity, as an operating activity. The impact of adopting this standard on our FinancialStatements will be dependent on the timing and intrinsic value of future share-based compensation award exercises. Given the current intrinsic value of our outstanding share-based compensation awards, we currently anticipate a significant impact to our reported tax rate as exercises occur.

In June 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-13, Financial Instruments-Credit Losses (Topic 326): Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments, which requires measurement and recognition of expected versus incurred credit losses for financial assetsheld. ASU 2016-13The standard is effective for the Company prospectively in our first quarter of fiscal 2020 with earlyand any impact upon adoption permitted beginning in thefirst quarter of fiscal 2019. We are currently evaluating the impact the adoption of this standard will have on our Financial Statements.

In October 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-16, Income Taxes (Topic 740): Intra-Entity Transfers of Assets Other Than Inventory, which requires the recognition of the income tax consequences of an intra-entity transfer of an asset, other than inventory, when the transfer occurs. The guidance will requirebe reflected through a modified retrospective application with a cumulativecumulative-effect adjustment to opening retained earnings atAccumulated deficit as of the beginning of our first quarter of fiscal 2019 but permits adoption at the beginning of an earlier annual period.2020. We are currently evaluatingdo not anticipate the impact of adopting ASU 2016-16 onthis standard will be material to our Consolidated Financial Statements.


Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

Our reported results are impacted by the application of certain accounting policies that require us to make subjective or complex judgments.  These judgments involve estimations of the effect of matters that are inherently uncertain and may significantly impact our quarterly or annual results of operations or financial condition.  Changes in the estimates and judgments could significantly affect our results of operations and financial condition and cash flows in future years.  A description of what we consider to be our most significant critical accounting policies follows.

Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets

We review long-lived assets of restaurants we intend to continue operating as Company restaurants (primarily PP&E, right-of-use operating lease assets and allocated intangible assets subject to amortization) semi-annuallyannually for impairment, or whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of a restaurant may not be recoverable.  We evaluate recoverability based on the restaurant’s forecasted undiscounted cash flows, which incorporate our best estimate of sales growth and margin improvement based upon our plans for the unit and actual results at comparable restaurants.  For restaurant assets that are deemed to not be recoverable, we write-down the impaired restaurant to its estimated fair value.  Key assumptions in the determination of fair value are the future after-tax cash flows of the restaurant, which are reduced by future royalties a franchisee would pay and a discount rate.  The after-tax cash flows incorporate reasonable sales growth and margin improvement assumptions that would be used by a franchisee in the determination of a purchase price for the restaurant.  Estimates of future cash flows are highly subjective judgments and can be significantly impacted by changes in the business or economic conditions.



We perform an impairment evaluation at a restaurant group level ifwhen it is more likely than not that we will refranchise restaurants as a group.  Expected net sales proceeds are generally based on actual bids from the buyer, if available, or anticipated bids given the discounted projected after-tax cash flows for the group of restaurants.  Historically, these anticipated bids have been reasonably accurate estimations of the proceeds ultimately received. The after-tax cash flows used in determining the anticipated bids incorporate reasonable assumptions we believe a franchisee would make such as sales growth and margin improvement as well as expectations as to the useful lives of the restaurant assets. These after-tax cash flows also include a deduction for the anticipated, future royalties we would receive under a franchise agreement with terms substantially at market entered into simultaneously with the refranchising transaction.  

The discount rate used in the fair value calculations is our estimate of the required rate of return that a franchisee would expect to receive when purchasing a similar restaurant or groups of restaurants and the related long-lived assets.  The discount rate incorporates rates of returns for historical refranchising market transactions and is commensurate with the risks and uncertainty inherent in the forecasted cash flows.

Impairment of Goodwill

We evaluate goodwill for impairment on an annual basis as of the beginning of our fourth quarter or more often if an event occurs or circumstances change that indicates impairment might exist.  Goodwill is evaluated for impairment by determining whether the fair value of our reporting units exceed their carrying values. Our reporting units are our business units (which are aligned based on geography) in our KFC, Pizza Hut and Taco Bell Divisions.  Fair value is the price a willing buyer would pay for the


reporting unit, and is generally estimated using discounted expected future after-tax cash flows from franchise royalties and Company-owned restaurant operations, and franchise royalties.if any.

Future cash flow estimates and the discount rate are the key assumptions when estimating the fair value of a reporting unit.  Future cash flows are based on growth expectations relative to recent historical performance and incorporate sales growth (from net new units or same-sales growth) and margin improvement (for those reporting units which include Company-owned restaurant operations) assumptions that we believe a third-party buyer would assume when determining a purchase price for the reporting unit.  The sales growth andAny margin improvement assumptions that factor into the discounted cash flows are highly correlated with sales growth as cash flow growth can be achieved through various interrelated strategies such as product pricing and restaurant productivity initiatives. The discount rate is our estimate of the required rate of return that a third-party buyer would expect to receive when purchasing a business from us that constitutes a reporting unit. We believe the discount rate is commensurate with the risks and uncertainty inherent in the forecasted cash flows.

The fair values of all our reporting units with goodwill balances were substantially in excess of their respective carrying values as of the 20162019 goodwill testing date.

When we refranchise restaurants, we include goodwill in the carrying amount of the restaurants disposed of based on the relative fair values of the portion of the reporting unit disposed of in the refranchising versus the portion of the reporting unit that will be retained.  The fair value of the portion of the reporting unit disposed of in a refranchising is determined by reference to the discounted value of the future cash flows expected to be generated by the restaurant and retained by the franchisee, which include a deduction for the anticipated, future royalties the franchisee will pay us associated with the franchise agreement entered into simultaneously with the refranchising transaction. Appropriate adjustments are made to the fair value determinations if such franchise agreement is determined to not be at prevailing market rates.  When determining whether such franchise agreement is at prevailing market rates our primary consideration is consistency with the terms of our current franchise agreements both within the country that the restaurants are being refranchised in and around the world.  The Company believes consistency in royalty rates as a percentage of sales is appropriate as the Company and franchisee share in the impact of near-term fluctuations in sales results with the acknowledgment that over the long-term the royalty rate represents an appropriate rate for both parties.

The discounted value of the future cash flows expected to be generated by the restaurant and retained by the franchisee is reduced by future royalties the franchisee will pay the Company.  The Company thus considers the fair value of future royalties to be received under the franchise agreement as fair value retained in its determination of the goodwill to be written off when refranchising.  Others may consider the fair value of these future royalties as fair value disposed of and thus would conclude that a larger percentage of a reporting unit’s fair value is disposed of in a refranchising transaction.

During 2016, the Company's reporting units with the most significant2019, refranchising activity completed by the Company was limited and recordedthe write-off of goodwill were Pizza Hut U.S. and Taco Bell U.S.  Within Pizza Hut U.S., 195 restaurants were refranchised (representing 38% of beginning-of-year company units) and $3 million in goodwillassociated with these transactions was written off (representing 4% of beginning-of-year goodwill). Within Taco Bell U.S., 46 restaurants were refranchised (representing 5% of beginning-of-year company units) and $2 million in goodwill was written off (representing 2% of beginning-of-year goodwill).less than $1 million.

See Note 2 for a further discussion of our policies regarding goodwill.

Self-Insured Property and Casualty Losses

We record our best estimate of the remaining cost to settle incurred self-insured property and casualty losses.  The estimate is based on the results of an independent actuarial study and considers historical claim frequency and severity as well as changes in factors such as our business environment, benefit levels, medical costs and the regulatory environment that could impact overall self-insurance costs.  Additionally, our reserve includes a risk margin to cover unforeseen events that may occur over the several years required to settle claims, increasing our confidence level that the recorded reserve is adequate.

See Note 20 for a further discussion of our insurance programs.

Pension Plans

Certain of our employees are covered under defined benefit pension plans. Our two most significant plans are in the U.S. and combined had a projected benefit obligation (“PBO”) of $993$1,015 million and a fair value of plan assets of $837$886 million at December 31, 2016.2019.

The PBO reflects the actuarial present value of all benefits earned to date by employees and incorporates assumptions as to future compensation levels.  Due to the relatively long time frame over which benefits earned to date are expected to be paid, our PBOs


are highly sensitive to changes in discount rates.  For our U.S. plans, we measured our PBOs using a discount rate of 4.60%3.50% at December 31, 20162019.  This discount rate was determined with the assistance of our independent actuary.  The primary basis for this discount rate determination is a model that consists of a hypothetical portfolio of ten or more corporate debt instruments rated Aa or higher by Moody’s or Standard & Poor's ("S&P") with cash flows that mirror our expected benefit payment cash flows under the plans.  We exclude from the model those corporate debt instruments flagged by Moody’s or S&P for a potential downgrade (if the potential downgrade would result in a rating below Aa by both Moody's and S&P) and bonds with yields that were two standard deviations or more above the mean.  In considering possible bond portfolios, the model allows the bond cash flows for a particular year to exceed the expected benefit payment cash flows for that year.  Such excesses are assumed to be reinvested at appropriate one-year forward rates and used to meet the benefit payment cash flows in a future year.  The weighted-average yield of this hypothetical portfolio was used to arrive at an appropriate discount rate.  We also ensure that changes in the discount rate as compared to the prior year are consistent with the overall change in prevailing market rates and make adjustments as necessary. A 50 basis-point increase in this discount rate would have decreased these U.S. plans’ PBOs by approximately $60$64 million at our measurement date.  Conversely, a 50 basis-point decrease in this discount rate would have increased our U.S. plans’ PBOs by approximately $65$71 million at our measurement date.

The pension expensenet periodic benefit cost we will record in 20172020 is also impacted by the discount rate, as well as the long-term rates of return on plan assets and mortality assumptions we selected at our measurement date.  We expect net periodic benefit cost plus expected pension expensesettlement charges for our U.S. plans excluding the impact of settlement charges associated with the deferred vested payout programto increase approximately $10 million in 2016 (See Note 5), to be largely unchanged in 2017.2020.  A 50 basis-point decreasechange in our discount rate assumption at our 20162019 measurement date would increaseimpact our 20172020 U.S. pension expensenet periodic benefit cost by approximately $8$6 million. A 50 basis-point increaseThe impacts of changes in our discount rate assumption at our 2016 measurement date would decrease our 2017 U.S.net periodic benefit costs are reflected primarily in Other pension expense by approximately $4 million.(income) expense.

Our estimated long-term rate of return on U.S. plan assets is based upon the weighted-average of historical and expected future returns for each asset category.  Our expected long-term rate of return on U.S. plan assets, for purposes of determining 20172020 pension expense, at December 31, 20162019 was 6.5%.5.50%, net of administrative and investment fees paid from plan assets.  We believe this rate is appropriate given the composition of our plan assets and historical market returns thereon.  A 100 basis point change in our expected long-term rate of return on plan assets assumption would impact our 20172020 U.S. pension expensenet periodic benefit cost by approximately $8 million. Additionally, every 100 basis point variation in actual return on plan assets versus our expected return of 6.5%5.50% will impact our unrecognized pre-tax actuarial net loss by approximately $8 million.

A decrease in discount rates over time has largely contributed to an unrecognized pre-tax actuarial net loss of $150$118 million included in Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)AOCI for these U.S. plans at December 31, 2016.2019.  We will recognize approximately $7$14 million of such loss in net periodic benefit cost in 20172020 versus $6$1 million recognized in 2016.2019. See Note 15.14.

Income Taxes

At December 31, 2016,2019, we had valuation allowances of approximately $195$787 million to reduce our $1.1 billion$1,517 million of deferred tax assets to amounts that are more likely than not to be realized. The net deferred tax assets primarily relate to capital loss carryforwards and temporary differences in profitable U.S. federal, state and foreign jurisdictions and net operating losses in certain foreign jurisdictions, the majority of which do not expire, and U.S. foreign tax credit carryovers that expire 10 years from inception and for which we anticipate having foreign earnings to utilize.expire. In evaluating our ability to recover our deferred tax assets, we consider future taxable income in the various jurisdictions as well as carryforward periods and restrictions on usage. The estimation of future taxable income in these jurisdictions and our resulting ability to utilize deferred tax assets can significantly change based on future events, including our determinations as to feasibility of certain tax planning strategies and refranchising plans. Thus, recorded valuation allowances may be subject to material future changes.

As a matter of course, we are regularly audited by federal, state and foreign tax authorities. We recognize the benefit of positions taken or expected to be taken in our tax returns in our Income tax provision when it is more likely than not that the position would be sustained upon examination by these tax authorities. A recognized tax position is then measured at the largest amount of benefit that is greater than fifty percent likely of being realized upon settlement. At December 31, 2016,2019, we had $91$188 million of unrecognized tax benefits, $87$8 million of which are temporary in nature and, if recognized, would not impact the effective tax rate. We evaluate unrecognized tax benefits, including interest thereon, on a quarterly basis to ensure that they have been appropriately adjusted for events, including audit settlements, which may impact our ultimate payment for such exposures.

We have investments in

The 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act included a mandatory deemed repatriation tax on accumulated earnings of foreign subsidiaries, where the carrying valuesand as a result, previously unremitted earnings for financial reporting exceed the tax basis.  We have not providedwhich no U.S. deferred tax on the portion of the excessliability had been provided have now been subject to U.S. tax. Our cash currently held overseas is primarily limited to that we believe is indefinitely reinvested, as we have the ability and intentnecessary to indefinitely postpone these basis differences from reversing with a tax consequence.   We estimate that our total temporary difference upon whichfund working capital requirements. Thus, we have not provided deferred tax is approximately $2.1 billion at December 31, 2016.  A determination of the deferred tax liabilitytaxes on this amount is not practicable.



If our intentions regarding our abilityforeign unremitted earnings, including U.S. state income and intent to postpone these basis differences from reversing with a tax consequence change, deferred tax may need to be provided that could materially impact the provision for income taxes.

foreign withholding taxes, as we believe they are indefinitely reinvested. See Note 1817 for a further discussion of our incomeIncome taxes.

Item 7A.Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.

The Company is exposed to financial market risks associated with interest rates, foreign currency exchange rates, commodity prices and commodity prices.the value of our equity investment in Grubhub.  In the normal course of business and in accordance with our policies, we manage these risks through a variety of strategies, which may include the use of financial and commodity derivative instruments to hedge our underlying exposures.  Our policies prohibit the use of derivative instruments for trading purposes, and we have processes in place to monitor and control their use.

Interest Rate Risk

We have a market risk exposure to changes in interest rates, principally in the U.S. Our outstanding Long-termtotal debt, excluding finance leases, of $9.1$10.6 billion includes 73%77% fixed-rate debt and 27%23% variable-rate debt. We have attempted to minimize the interest rate risk related to $1.55 billion of thisfrom variable-rate debt through the use of interest rate swaps.swaps that, as of December 31, 2019, result in a fixed interest rate on $1.55 billion of our variable rate debt. As a result, approximately 90%92% of our $9.1$10.6 billion of outstanding debt at December 31, 20162019 is effectively fixed-rate debt. See Note 1110 for details on these issuances and repayments and Note 1312 for details related to interest rate swaps.

As of both December 31, 20162019 and December 26, 201531, 2018 a hypothetical 100 basis-point increase in short-term interest rates would result, over the following twelve-month period after consideration of the aforementioned interest rate swaps, in an increase of approximately $10$9 million and $14 million, respectively, in Interest expense, net within our Consolidated StatementsStatement of Income. These estimated amounts are based upon the current level of variable-rate debt that has not been swapped to fixed and assume no changes in the volume or composition of that debt and include noexclude any impact from interest income related to cash and cash equivalents.

The fair value of our cumulative fixed-rate debt of $6.6$8.2 billion as of December 31, 2016,2019, would decrease approximately $375$450 million as a result of the same hypothetical 100 basis-point increase. At December 31, 2016,2019, a hypothetical 100 basis-point decrease in short-term interest rates would decrease the fair value of our interest rate swaps approximately $55$66 million. Fair value was determined based on the present value of expected future cash flows considering the risks involved and using discount rates appropriate for the durations.

Foreign Currency Exchange Rate Risk

Changes in foreign currency exchange rates impact the translation of our reported foreign currency denominated earnings, cash flows and net investments in foreign operations and the fair value of our foreign currency denominated financial instruments. Historically, we have chosen not to hedge foreign currency risks related to our foreign currency denominated earnings and cash flows through the use of financial instruments. We attempt to minimize the exposure related to our net investments in foreign operations by financing those investments with local currency denominated debt when practical. In addition, we attempt to minimize the exposure related to foreign currency denominated financial instruments by purchasing goods and services from third parties in local currencies when practical. Consequently, foreign currency denominated financial instruments consist primarily of intercompany receivables and payables.  At times, we utilize forward contracts and cross-currency swaps to reduce our exposure related to these intercompany receivables and payables.  The notional amount and maturity dates of these contracts match those of the underlying receivables or payables such that our foreign currency exchange risk related to these instruments is minimized.

The Company’s foreign currency net asset exposure (defined as foreign currency assets less foreign currency liabilities) totaled approximately $2.1$1.2 billion as of December 31, 20162019. Operating in international markets exposes the Company to movements in foreign currency exchange rates.  The Company’s primary exposures result from our operations in Asia-Pacific, Europe and the Americas.  For the fiscal year ended December 31, 20162019 Operating Profit would have decreased approximately $105$130 million if all foreign currencies had uniformly weakened 10% relative to the U.S. dollar.  This estimated reduction assumes no changes in sales volumes, or local currency sales or input prices.



Commodity Price Risk

We are subject to volatility in food costs as a result of market risk associated with commodity prices.  Our ability to recover increased costs through higher pricing is, at times, limited by the competitive environment in which we operate.  We manage our exposure to this risk primarily through pricing agreements with our vendors.

Equity Investment Risk
46
YUM holds 2,820,464 shares of Grubhub common stock (See Note 4).  As of December 31, 2019, the NYSE composite closing sales price of Grubhub was $48.64. A hypothetical 10% decline in the price of these shares would result in a $14 million decrease in the fair value of these investments, which would be reflected as a charge in Investment (income) expense, net within our Consolidated Statements of Income. The effects of changes in market prices for equity securities are unpredictable, which could cause significant fluctuations in our quarterly and annual results.   




Item 8.Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.

INDEX TO FINANCIAL INFORMATION

 Page Reference 
Consolidated Financial Statements  
   
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm 
   
Consolidated Statements of Income for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2016, December 26, 2015 and December 27, 2014 
   
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2016, December 26, 2015 and December 27, 2014 
   
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2016, December 26, 2015 and December 27, 2014 
   
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2016 and December 26, 2015 
   
Consolidated Statements of Shareholders’ Equity (Deficit) for the fiscal years ended
December 31, 2016, December 26, 2015 and December 27, 2014
Deficit
 
   
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements 

Financial Statement Schedules

No schedules are required because either the required information is not present or not present in amounts sufficient to require submission of the schedule, or because the information required is included in the above-listed financial statements or notes thereto.

47





Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm


TheTo the Shareholders and Board of Directors and Shareholders
YUM!Yum! Brands, Inc.:

Opinions on the Consolidated Financial Statements and Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of YUM!Yum! Brands, Inc. and Subsidiaries (YUM)(the Company) as of December 31, 20162019 and December 26, 2015, and2018, the related consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income, cash flows, and shareholders’ equity (deficit)deficit for each of the fiscal years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2016.2019, and the related notes (collectively, the “consolidated financial statements”). We also have audited YUM’sthe Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2016,2019, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework(2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission.

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of December 31, 2019 and 2018, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2019, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. Also in our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2019 based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. YUM’s

Changes in Accounting Principle

As discussed in Note 4 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company changed its method of accounting for leases in fiscal year 2019 due to the adoption of Topic 842, Leases, and for revenue from contracts with customers in fiscal year 2018 due to the adoption of Topic 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customers.

Basis for Opinions

The Company’s management is responsible for these consolidated financial statements, for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting, and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying Item 9A, “Management’sManagement’s Report on Internal Control overOver Financial Reporting.”Reporting in the accompanying Item 9A. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on thesethe Company’s consolidated financial statements and an opinion on YUM’sthe Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB) and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States).PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud, and whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects.

Our audits of the consolidated financial statements included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the consolidated financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence supportingregarding the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements, assessingstatements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, andas well as evaluating the overall presentation of the consolidated financial statement presentation.statements. Our audit of internal control over financial reporting included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audits also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinions.



Definition and Limitations of Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

In our opinion,Critical Audit Matters

The critical audit matters communicated below are matters arising from the current period audit of the consolidated financial statements referredthat were communicated or required to above present fairly,be communicated to the audit committee and that: (1) relate to accounts or disclosures that are material to the consolidated financial statements and (2) involved our especially challenging, subjective, or complex judgments. The communication of critical audit matters does not alter in all material respects,any way our opinion on the consolidated financial positionstatements, taken as a whole, and we are not, by communicating the critical audit matters below, providing separate opinions on the critical audit matters or on the accounts or disclosures to which they relate.

Evaluation of YUM asunrecognized tax benefits

As discussed in Note 17 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company has recorded unrecognized tax benefits, excluding associated interest, of December 31, 2016$188 million. Tax laws are complex and December 26, 2015,often subject to different interpretations by tax payers and the resultsrespective taxing authorities.

We identified the evaluation of its operationsunrecognized tax benefits as a critical audit matter. Subjective and its cash flows for eachcomplex auditor judgment was required to evaluate tax law and regulations, court rulings and audit settlements in various taxing jurisdictions to assess the population of significant uncertain tax positions identified by the Company arising from tax planning strategies.

The primary procedures we performed to address this critical audit matter included the following. We tested certain internal controls over the Company’s process of identification of uncertain tax positions, including controls to (1) identify tax planning strategies that create significant uncertain tax positions, (2) evaluate interpretations of tax laws and court rulings, and (3) assess which tax positions may not be sustained upon examination by a taxing authority. We involved tax professionals with specialized skills and knowledge who assisted in:

Obtaining an understanding of the fiscal yearsCompany’s implementation of tax planning strategies;
Identifying new tax positions created by tax planning strategies and comparing the results to the Company’s identification of uncertain tax positions;
Evaluating the Company’s interpretation of tax laws and court rulings by developing an independent assessment; and
Performing an independent assessment to identify tax positions that may not be sustained upon examination by the respective taxing authority and comparing the results to the Company’s assessment.



Evaluation of intercompany transfer of certain intellectual property rights

As discussed in Note 17 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company completed an intercompany restructuring and transfer of certain intellectual property rights primarily to subsidiaries in the three-year period ended December 31, 2016,United States and United Kingdom (UK). The Company recorded a deferred tax asset of $586 million for the step-up in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. Also in our opinion, YUM maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2016, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizationstax basis to current fair value of the Treadway Commission.intellectual property rights transferred to the UK and determined the portion that is amortizable under the applicable tax law. A valuation allowance of $366 million was established for the portion of the deferred tax asset that is not expected to be realized, resulting in a net deferred tax asset of $221 million, which is expected to be amortized and recovered over a 20-year period.

We identified the evaluation of the intercompany transfer of certain intellectual property rights as a critical audit matter. Specifically, subjective and complex auditor judgment was required to evaluate management’s interpretation of UK tax law and regulations in determining the step-up in tax basis of the intellectual property rights and the portion that is amortizable under UK tax law.

The primary procedures we performed to address this critical audit matter included the following. We tested certain internal controls over the Company’s evaluation of the intercompany transfer, including controls related to evaluating UK tax laws and regulations, measurement of the tax basis resulting from the intercompany transfer and determining the amortizable portion. We involved tax professionals with specialized skills and knowledge who assisted in:

Evaluating the Company’s interpretation of UK tax laws and regulations applicable to the intercompany transfer; and
Assessing the Company’s measurement of the tax basis of the intellectual property rights transferred to the UK, including the portion of the tax basis that is amortizable under UK tax law.



/s/ KPMG LLP
Louisville, Kentucky
February 21, 2017



We have served as the Company’s auditor since 1997.
48
Louisville, Kentucky

February 19, 2020



Consolidated Statements of Income
YUM! Brands, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Fiscal years ended December 31, 2016, December 26, 2015 and December 27, 2014
Yum! Brands, Inc. and SubsidiariesYum! Brands, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Fiscal years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017Fiscal years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017
(in millions, except per share data)
 2016 2015 2014 2019 2018 2017
Revenues            
Company sales $4,200
 $4,356
 $4,503
 $1,546
 $2,000
 $3,572
Franchise and license fees and income 2,166
 2,084
 2,084
Franchise and property revenues 2,660
 2,482
 2,306
Franchise contributions for advertising and other services 1,391
 1,206
 
Total revenues 6,366
 6,440
 6,587
 5,597
 5,688
 5,878
Costs and Expenses, Net            
Company restaurants      
Food and paper 1,269
 1,348
 1,471
Payroll and employee benefits 1,109
 1,131
 1,172
Occupancy and other operating expenses 1,120
 1,168
 1,227
Company restaurant expenses 3,498
 3,647
 3,870
 1,235
 1,634
 2,954
General and administrative expenses 1,161
 1,099
 1,028
 917
 895
 999
Franchise and license expenses 202
 237
 159
Closures and impairment (income) expenses 14
 15
 18
Franchise and property expenses 180
 188
 237
Franchise advertising and other services expense 1,368
 1,208
 
Refranchising (gain) loss (141) 23
 (16) (37) (540) (1,083)
Other (income) expense 7
 17
 11
 4
 7
 10
Total costs and expenses, net 4,741
 5,038
 5,070
 3,667
 3,392
 3,117
            
Operating Profit 1,625
 1,402
 1,517
 1,930
 2,296
 2,761
            
Investment (income) expense, net 67
 (9) (5)
Other pension (income) expense 4
 14
 47
Interest expense, net 307
 141
 143
 486
 452
 445
      
Income from continuing operations before income taxes 1,318
 1,261
 1,374
      
Income before income taxes 1,373
 1,839
 2,274
Income tax provision 324
 325
 368
 79
 297
 934
Income from continuing operations 994
 936
 1,006
Income from discontinued operations, net of tax 625
 357
 45
Net Income $1,619
 $1,293
 $1,051
 $1,294
 $1,542
 $1,340
            
Basic Earnings per Common Share from continuing operations $2.52
 $2.15
 $2.27
Basic Earnings per Common Share from discontinued operations $1.59
 $0.82
 $0.10
Basic Earnings Per Common Share $4.11
 $2.97
 $2.37
 $4.23
 $4.80
 $3.86
            
Diluted Earnings per Common Share from continuing operations $2.48
 $2.11
 $2.22
Diluted Earnings per Common Share from discontinued operations $1.56
 $0.81
 $0.10
Diluted Earnings Per Common Share $4.04
 $2.92
 $2.32
 $4.14
 $4.69
 $3.77
            
Dividends Declared Per Common Share $1.73
 $1.74
 $1.56
 $1.68
 $1.44
 $0.90
            
See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.            


49



Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income
YUM! Brands, Inc. and Subsidiaries      
Fiscal years ended December 31, 2016, December 26, 2015 and December 27, 2014
Yum! Brands, Inc. and Subsidiaries      
Fiscal years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017Fiscal years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017
(in millions)            
          
 2016 2015 2014 2019 2018 2017
            
Net Income - YUM! Brands, Inc. $1,619
 $1,293
 $1,051
Net Income $1,294
 $1,542
 $1,340
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax:            
Translation adjustments and gains (losses) from intra-entity transactions of a long-term investment nature            
Adjustments and gains (losses) arising during the year (166) (253) (147) 28
 (94) 115
Reclassifications of adjustments and (gains) losses into Net Income (11) 115
 2
 
 (4) 55
 (177) (138) (145) 28
 (98) 170
Tax (expense) benefit 20
 
 4
 (4) 6
 (8)
 (157) (138) (141) 24
 (92) 162
            
Changes in pension and post-retirement benefits            
Unrealized gains (losses) arising during the year (63) 101
 (209) (39) 32
 (17)
Reclassification of (gains) losses into Net Income 44
 53
 27
 10
 22
 52
 (19) 154
 (182) (29) 54
 35
Tax (expense) benefit 5
 (57) 69
 7
 (13) (14)
 (14) 97
 (113) (22) 41
 21
            
Changes in derivative instruments            
Unrealized gains (losses) arising during the year 48
 32
 23
 (51) 19
 (52)
Reclassification of (gains) losses into Net Income (8) (41) (23) (25) (39) 58
 40
 (9) 
 (76) (20) 6
Tax (expense) benefit (16) 1
 
 20
 6
 (2)
 24
 (8) 
 (56) (14) 4
            
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax (147) (49) (254) (54) (65) 187
Comprehensive Income $1,472
 $1,244
 $797
 $1,240
 $1,477
 $1,527
            
See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.



50



Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
YUM! Brands, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Fiscal years ended December 31, 2016, December 26, 2015 and December 27, 2014
Yum! Brands, Inc. and SubsidiariesYum! Brands, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Fiscal years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017Fiscal years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017
(in millions)
 2016 2015 2014 2019 2018 2017
Cash Flows – Operating Activities from Continuing Operations      
Cash Flows – Operating Activities      
Net Income $1,619
 $1,293
 $1,051
 $1,294
 $1,542
 $1,340
Income from discontinued operations, net of tax (625) (357) (45)
Depreciation and amortization 309
 322
 328
 112
 137
 253
Closures and impairment (income) expenses 14
 15
 18
Refranchising (gain) loss (141) 23
 (16) (37) (540) (1,083)
Investment (income) expense, net 67
 (9) (5)
Contributions to defined benefit pension plans (41) (98) (18) (15) (16) (55)
Deferred income taxes 27
 (102) (46) (232) (11) 634
Excess tax benefit from share-based compensation (83) (47) (40)
Share-based compensation expense 80
 46
 45
 59
 50
 65
Changes in accounts and notes receivable (46) (35) (21) (56) (66) (19)
Changes in inventories 
 (3) (2)
Changes in prepaid expenses and other current assets 6
 (13) 2
 (8) 
 (10)
Changes in accounts payable and other current liabilities 17
 93
 23
 (36) (68) (173)
Changes in income taxes payable 16
 15
 (135) 23
 65
 (55)
Other, net 52
 61
 73
 144
 92
 138
Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities from Continuing Operations 1,204
 1,213
 1,217
Cash Flows – Investing Activities from Continuing Operations     
Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities 1,315
 1,176
 1,030
Cash Flows – Investing Activities 
    
Capital spending (422) (461) (508) (196) (234) (318)
QuikOrder acquisition, net of cash acquired 
 (66) 
Investment in Grubhub Inc. common stock 
 (200) 
Proceeds from refranchising of restaurants 346
 219
 83
 110
 825
 1,773
Other, net 52
 53
 1
 (2) (12) 17
Net Cash Used in Investing Activities from Continuing Operations (24) (189) (424)
Cash Flows – Financing Activities from Continuing Operations     
Net Cash Provided by (Used in) Investing Activities (88) 313
 1,472
Cash Flows – Financing Activities 
    
Proceeds from long-term debt 6,900
 
 
 800
 1,556
 1,088
Repayments of long-term debt (324) (261) (65) (331) (1,264) (385)
Revolving credit facilities, three months or less, net (701) 285
 416
 
 
 
Short-term borrowings, by original maturity            
More than three months – proceeds 1,400
 609
 
 130
 59
 
More than three months – payments (2,000) 
 
 (126) (59) 
Three months or less, net 
 
 
 
 
 
Repurchase shares of Common Stock (5,402) (1,200) (820) (815) (2,390) (1,960)
Excess tax benefit from share-based compensation 83
 47
 40
Dividends paid on Common Stock (744) (730) (669) (511) (462) (416)
Debt issuance costs (86) 
 
 (10) (13) (32)
Net transfers from discontinued operations 289
 235
 372
Other, net (92) (43) (13) (75) (47) (90)
Net Cash Used in Financing Activities from Continuing Operations (677) (1,058) (739)
Net Cash Used in Financing Activities (938) (2,620) (1,795)
Effect of Exchange Rate on Cash and Cash Equivalents (25) 11
 12
 5
 (63) 61
Net Increase (Decrease) in Cash, Cash Equivalents, Restricted Cash and Restricted Cash Equivalents - Continuing Operations 478
 (23) 66
Net Increase (Decrease) in Cash, Cash Equivalents, Restricted Cash and Restricted Cash Equivalents 294
 (1,194) 768
Cash, Cash Equivalents, Restricted Cash and Restricted Cash Equivalents – Beginning of Year 334
 357
 291
 474
 1,668
 831
Cash, Cash Equivalents, Restricted Cash and Restricted Cash Equivalents – End of Year $812
 $334
 $357
 $768
 $474
 $1,599
            
Cash Provided by Operating Activities from Discontinued Operations $829
 $931
 $832
Cash Used in Investing Activities from Discontinued Operations (287) (493) (512)
Cash Used in Financing Activities from Discontinued Operations (292) (234) (375)
      
See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.            

51



Consolidated Balance Sheets
YUM! Brands, Inc. and Subsidiaries    
December 31, 2016 and December 26, 2015
Yum! Brands, Inc. and Subsidiaries    
December 31, 2019 and 2018December 31, 2019 and 2018
(in millions)        
 2016 2015 2019 2018
ASSETS        
Current Assets        
Cash and cash equivalents $704
 $313
 $605
 $292
Accounts and notes receivable, net 370
 324
 584
 561
Inventories 36
 40
Prepaid expenses and other current assets 238
 133
 338
 354
Advertising cooperative assets, restricted 134
 103
Current assets of discontinued operations 
 774
Total Current Assets 1,482
 1,687
 1,527
 1,207
        
Property, plant and equipment, net 2,160
 2,347
 1,170
 1,237
Goodwill 541
 571
 530
 525
Intangible assets, net 151
 164
 244
 242
Other assets 370
 330
 1,313
 724
Deferred income taxes 774
 591
 447
 195
Noncurrent assets of discontinued operations 
 2,371
Total Assets $5,478
 $8,061
 $5,231
 $4,130
        
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY (DEFICIT)    
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ DEFICIT    
Current Liabilities        
Accounts payable and other current liabilities $1,132
 $1,074
 $960
 $911
Income taxes payable 37
 55
 150
 69
Short-term borrowings 66
 921
 431
 321
Advertising cooperative liabilities 134
 103
Current liabilities of discontinued operations 
 934
Total Current Liabilities 1,369
 3,087
 1,541
 1,301
        
Long-term debt 9,061
 3,007
 10,131
 9,751
Other liabilities and deferred credits 704
 745
 1,575
 1,004
Noncurrent liabilities of discontinued operations 
 247
Total Liabilities 11,134
 7,086
 13,247
 12,056
        
Redeemable noncontrolling interest - discontinued operations 
 6
    
Shareholders’ Equity (Deficit)    
Common Stock, no par value, 750 shares authorized; 355 shares and 420 shares issued in 2016 and 2015, respectively 
 
Retained earnings (Accumulated Deficit) (5,223) 1,150
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) (433) (239)
Total Shareholders’ Equity (Deficit) – YUM! Brands, Inc. (5,656) 911
Noncontrolling interests - discontinued operations 
 58
Total Shareholders’ Equity (Deficit) (5,656) 969
Total Liabilities, Redeemable Noncontrolling Interest and Shareholders’ Equity (Deficit) $5,478
 $8,061
Shareholders’ Deficit    
Common Stock, no par value, 750 shares authorized; 300 shares and 306 shares issued in 2019 and 2018, respectively 
 
Accumulated deficit (7,628) (7,592)
Accumulated other comprehensive loss (388) (334)
Total Shareholders’ Deficit (8,016) (7,926)
Total Liabilities and Shareholders’ Deficit $5,231
 $4,130
        
See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.        

52



Consolidated Statements of Shareholders’ Equity (Deficit)  
YUM! Brands, Inc. and Subsidiaries              
Fiscal years ended December 31, 2016, December 26, 2015 and December 27, 2014  
(in millions)              
  Yum! Brands, Inc.      
  Issued Common Stock Retained Earnings (Accumulated Deficit) 
Accumulated
Other Comprehensive Income(Loss)
 Noncontrolling Interests Total Shareholders' Equity (Deficit) Redeemable Noncontrolling Interest
  Shares Amount     
Balance at December 28, 2013 443
 $
 $2,102
 $64
 $63
 $2,229
 $39
               
Net Income (loss)     1,051
   (1) 1,050
 (29)
Translation adjustments and gains (losses) from intra-entity transactions of a long-term investment nature (net of tax impact of $4 million)     
 (143) (1) (144) (1)
Reclassification of translation adjustments into income     
 2
 
 2
 
Pension and post-retirement benefit plans (net of tax impact of $69 million)     
 (113) 
 (113) 
Comprehensive Income (loss)     
   
 795
 (30)
Dividends declared     (691)   (4) (695) 
Repurchase of shares of Common Stock (11) (95) (725)   
 (820) 
Employee stock option and SARs exercises (includes tax impact of $37 million) 2
 33
 
   
 33
 
Compensation-related events (includes tax impact of $5 million) 
 62
 
   
 62
 
Balance at December 27, 2014 434
 $
 $1,737
 $(190) $57
 $1,604
 $9
               
Net Income (loss)     1,293
   6
 1,299
 (1)
Translation adjustments and gains (losses) from intra-entity transactions of a long-term investment nature (net of tax impact of $3 million)       (250) (4) (254) (2)
Reclassification of translation adjustments into income (net of tax impact of $3 million)       112
   112
  
Pension and post-retirement benefit plans (net of tax impact of $57 million)       97
   97
  
Net unrealized loss on derivative instruments (net of tax impact of $1 million)       (8)   (8)  
Comprehensive Income (loss)           1,246
 (3)
Dividends declared   
 (756)     (756)  
Acquisition of Little Sheep store-level noncontrolling interests   1
     (1) 
  
Repurchase of shares of Common Stock (16) (76) (1,124)     (1,200)  
Employee stock option and SARs exercises (includes tax impact of $43 million) 2
 11
       11
  
Compensation-related events (includes tax impact of $7 million)   64
       64
  
Balance at December 26, 2015 420
 $
 $1,150
 $(239) $58
 $969
 $6
               
Net Income (loss)     1,619
   18
 1,637
 (7)
Translation adjustments and gains (losses) from intra-entity transactions of a long-term investment nature (net of tax impact of $20 million)       (146) (3) (149) 1
Reclassification of translation adjustments into income       (11)   (11) 
Pension and post-retirement benefit plans (net of tax impact of $5 million)       (14)   (14)  
Net unrealized gain on derivative instruments (net of tax impact of $16 million)       24
   24
  
Comprehensive Income (loss)           1,487
 (6)
Dividends declared     (661)   (6) (667)  
Separation of China business     (1,932) (47) (67) (2,046)  
Repurchase of shares of Common Stock (68) (49) (5,399)     (5,448)  
Employee stock option and SARs exercises (includes tax impact of $75 million) 3
 1
       1
  
Compensation-related events (includes tax impact of $11 million)   48
       48
  
Balance at December 31, 2016 355
 $
 $(5,223) $(433) $
 $(5,656) $
               
See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.  
Consolidated Statements of Shareholders’ Deficit 
Yum! Brands, Inc. and Subsidiaries 
Fiscal years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017 
(in millions)           
  Issued Common Stock Accumulated Deficit 
Accumulated
Other Comprehensive Income(Loss)
 Total Shareholders' Deficit 
  Shares Amount    
Balance at December 31, 2016 (As Restated) 355
 $
 $(5,157) $(458) $(5,615) 
            
Net Income     1,340
   1,340
 
Translation adjustments and gains (losses) from intra-entity transactions of a long-term investment nature (net of tax impact of $8 million)       107
 107
 
Reclassification of translation adjustments into income       55
 55
 
Pension and post-retirement benefit plans (net of tax impact of $14 million)       21
 21
 
Net gain on derivative instruments (net of tax impact of $2 million)       4
 4
 
Comprehensive Income         1,527
 
Dividends declared     (311)   (311) 
Repurchase of shares of Common Stock (27) 
 (1,915)   (1,915) 
Employee share-based award exercises 4
 (58) (20)   (78) 
Share-based compensation events 
 58
 
   58
 
Balance at December 31, 2017 332
 $
 $(6,063) $(271) $(6,334) 
            
Net Income     1,542
   1,542
 
Translation adjustments and gains (losses) from intra-entity transactions of a long-term investment nature (net of tax impact of $6 million)       (88) (88) 
Reclassification of translation adjustments into income       (4) (4) 
Pension and post-retirement benefit plans (net of tax impact of $13 million)       41
 41
 
Net loss on derivative instruments (net of tax impact of $6 million)       (14) (14) 
Comprehensive Income         1,477
 
Dividends declared     (464)   (464) 
Repurchase of shares of Common Stock (28) (38) (2,356)   (2,394) 
Employee share-based award exercises 2
 (41)     (41) 
Share-based compensation events   79
     79
 
Adoption of accounting standards     (251) 2
 (249) 
Balance at December 31, 2018 306
 $
 $(7,592) $(334) $(7,926) 
            
Net Income     1,294
   1,294
 
Translation adjustments and gains (losses) from intra-entity transactions of a long-term investment nature (net of tax impact of $4 million)       24
 24
 
Pension and post-retirement benefit plans (net of tax impact of $7 million)       (22) (22) 
Net loss on derivative instruments (net of tax impact of $20 million)       (56) (56) 
Comprehensive Income         1,240
 
Dividends declared     (514)   (514) 
Repurchase of shares of Common Stock (8) (14) (796)   (810) 
Employee share-based award exercises 2
 (57) (18)   (75) 
Share-based compensation events   71
     71
 
Adoption of accounting standards     (2)   (2) 
Balance at December 31, 2019 300
 $
 $(7,628) $(388) $(8,016) 
            
See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. 

53



Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Tabular amounts in millions, except share data)

Note 1 – Description of Business

YUM!Yum! Brands, Inc. and its Subsidiaries (collectively referred to herein as “YUM”the “Company,” “YUM,” “we,” “us” or the “Company”“our”) comprise the worldwide operationsfranchises or operates a system of over 50,000 quick service restaurants in more than 150 countries and territories. At December 31, 2019, 98% of these restaurants were owned and operated by franchisees. The Company’s KFC, Pizza Hut and Taco Bell brands (collectively the “Concepts”).  YUM has over 43,500 units are global leaders of which 58% are located outside the U.S. in more than 135 countrieschicken, pizza and territories.  YUM was created as an independent, publicly-owned company on October 6, 1997 via a tax-free distribution by our former parent, PepsiCo, Inc., of our Common Stock to its shareholders.  References to YUM throughout these Consolidated Financial Statements are made using the first person notations of “we,” “us” or “our.”Mexican-style food categories.

Through our widely-recognized Concepts, we develop, operate or franchise a system of both traditional and non-traditional quick service restaurants. The terms "franchise" or "franchisee" within these Consolidated Financial Statements are meant to describe third parties that operate units under either franchise or license agreements. Each Concept has proprietary menu items and emphasizes the preparation of food with high quality ingredients as well as unique recipes and special seasonings to provide appealing, convenient, tasty and attractive food at competitive prices. Our traditional restaurants feature dine-in, carryout and, in some instances, drive-thru or delivery service. Non-traditional units include express units and kiosks which have a more limited menu and operate in non-traditional locations like malls, airports, gasoline service stations, train stations, subways, convenience stores, stadiums, amusement parks and colleges, where a full-scale traditional outlet would not be practical or efficient. We also operate or franchise multibrand units, where two or more of our Concepts are operated in a single unit.

As of December 31, 2016,2019, YUM consisted of three operating segments:

The KFC Division which includes our worldwide operations of the KFC concept
The Pizza Hut Division which includes our worldwide operations of the Pizza Hut concept
The Taco Bell Division which includes our worldwide operations of the Taco Bell concept

Effective January 2016, the Company's India Division was segmented by brand, integrated into the global KFC, Pizza Hut and Taco Bell Divisions, and is no longer a separate operating segment. While our consolidated results were not impacted, we have restated our historical segment information for consistent presentation. Integrating India into our Brand Divisions increased 2015 Total revenues for the KFC, Pizza Hut and Taco Bell Divisions by $105 million, $8 million and $3 million, respectively. 2015 Operating Profit decreased by $16 million, and $3 million for the KFC and Taco Bell Divisions, respectively, and increased less than $1 million for the Pizza Hut Division. Integrating India into our Brand Divisions increased 2014 Total revenues for the KFC, Pizza Hut and Taco Bell Divisions by $128 million, $11 million and $2 million, respectively. 2014 Operating Profit decreased by $6 million, $1 million and $2 million for the KFC, Pizza Hut and Taco Bell Divisions, respectively.

On October 31, 2016 (the “Distribution Date”), we completed the spin-off of our China business (the "Separation") into an independent, publicly-traded company under the name of Yum China Holdings, Inc. (“Yum China”). On the Distribution Date, we distributed to each of our shareholders of record as of the close of business on October 19, 2016 (the “Record Date”) one share of Yum China common stock for each share of our Common Stock held as of the Record Date. The distribution was structured to be a tax free distribution to our U.S. shareholders for federal income tax purposes in the United States. Yum China’s common stock now trades on the New York Stock Exchange ("NYSE") under the symbol “YUMC.” After the distribution, we do not beneficially own any shares of Yum China common stock.

Concurrent with the Separation, a subsidiary of the Company entered into a Master License Agreement with a subsidiary of Yum China for the exclusive right to use and sublicense the use of intellectual property owned by YUM and its affiliates for the development and operation of KFC, Pizza Hut and Taco Bell restaurants in China. Prior to the Separation, our operations in mainland China were reported in our former China Division segment results. As a result of the Separation, the results of operations, assets and liabilities, and cash flows of the separated business are presented as discontinued operations in our Consolidated Statements of Income, Consolidated Balance Sheets and Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for all periods presented. See additional information related to the impact of the Separation in Note 4.

Note 2 – Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Our preparation of the accompanying Consolidated Financial Statements in conformity with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles in the United States of America (“GAAP”) requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect reported amounts of assets and liabilities, disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements,Consolidated Financial Statements, and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period.  Actual results could differ from these estimates. 



Principles of Consolidation and Basis of Preparation.  Intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.  We consolidate entities in which we have a controlling financial interest, the usual condition of which is ownership of a majority voting interest.  We also consider for consolidation an entity, in which we have certain interests, where the controlling financial interest may be achieved through arrangements that do not involve voting interests.  Such an entity, known as a variable interest entity (“VIE”), is required to be consolidated by its primary beneficiary.  The primary beneficiary is the entity that possesses the power to direct the activities of the VIE that most significantly impact its economic performance and has the obligation to absorb losses or the right to receive benefits from the VIE that are significant to it.

Our most significant variable interests are in entities that operate restaurants under our Concepts’ franchise and license arrangements.  We do not have an equity interest in any of our franchisee businesses.businesses except for a minority interest in an entity that owns our KFC Brazil and Pizza Hut Brazil master franchisee rights. This minority interest does not give us the ability to significantly influence the franchisee.  Additionally, we do not typically provide significant financial support such as loans or guarantees to our franchisees.  However, we do have variable interests in certain franchisees through real estate lease arrangements to which we are a party.  At the end of 20162019, YUM has future lease payments due from franchisees, on a nominal basis, of approximately $250 million1 billion, and we are contingentlysecondarily liable on certain other lease agreements that have been assigned to franchisees. See the Lease Guarantees and Franchise Loan Pool and Equipment Guarantees sectionssection in Note 20.19. As our franchise and license arrangements provide our franchisee entities the power to direct the activities that most significantly impact their economic performance, we do not consider ourselves the primary beneficiary of any such entity that might otherwise be considered a VIE.

See Note 20 for additional information on our entity that operates a franchise lending program that is a VIE in which we have a variable interest but for which we are not the primary beneficiary and thus do not consolidate.

We participate in various advertising cooperatives with our franchisees, typically within a country where we have both Company-owned restaurants and franchise restaurants, established to collect and administer funds contributed for use in advertising and promotional programs designed to increase sales and enhance the reputation of the Company and its franchise owners.our Concepts. Contributions to the advertising cooperatives are required for both Company-owned and franchise restaurants and are generally based on a percentage of restaurant sales.  We maintain certain variable interests in these cooperatives. As the cooperatives are required to spend all funds collected on advertising and promotional programs, total equity at risk is not sufficient to permit the cooperatives to finance their activities without additional subordinated financial support. Therefore, these cooperatives are VIEs. As a result of our voting rights, we consolidate certain of these cooperatives for which we are the primary beneficiary.  Advertising cooperative assets, consisting primarily of cash received from the Company and franchisees and accounts receivable from franchisees, can only be used to settle obligations of the respective cooperative.  Advertising cooperative liabilities represent the corresponding obligation arising from the receipt of the contributions to purchase advertising and promotional programs for which creditors do not have recourse to the general credit of the Company as the primary beneficiary.  Therefore, we report all assets and liabilities of these advertising cooperatives that we consolidate as Advertising cooperative assets, restricted and Advertising cooperative liabilities in the Consolidated Balance Sheet.  As the contributions to these cooperatives are designated and segregated for advertising, we act as an agent for the franchisees with regard to these contributions.  Thus, we do not reflect franchisee contributions to these cooperatives in our Consolidated Statements of Income or Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows.



Fiscal Year.  YUM's fiscal year begins on January 1 and ends December 31 of each year, with each quarter comprised of three months. Our fiscal years have historically endedU.S. subsidiaries and certain international subsidiaries operate on the last Saturday in December and, as a result, a 53rd week was added every five or six years.  Theweekly periodic calendar where the first three quarters of each fiscal year consistedconsists of 12 weeks and the fourth quarter consistedconsists of 16 weeks in fiscal years with 52 weeks and 17 weeks in fiscal years with 53 weeks.  Our U.S. subsidiaries and certain international subsidiaries operated on similar fiscal calendars. Our remaining international subsidiaries operatedoperate on a monthly calendar and thus never had a 53rd week, with two months in the first quarter, three months in the second and third quarters and four months in the fourth quarter.  Certain international subsidiaries within our KFC, Pizza Hut and Taco Bell divisions have historically closed approximately one month or one period earliersimilar to facilitate consolidated reporting.that on which YUM operates.

Fiscal year 20162019 included 53 weeks for YUM, our U.S. businesses and for our international subsidiaries that reportreported on a period calendar. The 5353rdrd week added $76$66 million to Total revenues, and $27$24 million to Operating Profit and $17 million to Net Income in our 20162019 Consolidated Statement of Income.

On January 27, 2017, YUM’s Board of Directors approved a change in itsthe Company's fiscal year from a year ending on the last Saturday of December to a year beginning on January 1 and ending December 31 of each year, commencing with the year ending December 31, 2017. In connection with the new fiscal year,this change, the Company will movemoved from a 52-week periodic fiscal calendar with three 12-week interim quarters and a 16-week fourth quarter to a monthly reporting calendar with each quarter comprised of three months. Our U.S. subsidiaries will continue to report on a period calendar as described above.

TheConcurrent with the change in the Company’sCompany's fiscal year, was made primarily to accommodatewe also eliminated the removal of aforementionedone month or one period reporting lags from certain of our international subsidiary fiscal calendars, which will significantly improve the alignment of our global reporting


calendars.subsidiaries.  As a result of removing these reporting lags, each international subsidiary will now operateoperates either on a monthly calendar consistent with the Company’s new calendar or on a periodic calendar consistent with our U.S. subsidiaries.  We believe this change in our international subsidiary reporting calendars and the resulting elimination of reporting lags is preferable because a more current reporting calendar allows the Consolidated Financial Statements to more consistently and more timely reflect the impact of current events, economic conditions and global trends.

The change to the Company’s fiscal year isand removal of the international reporting lags became effective beginning in 2017 and does not impact the Company’s results for the2017. We applied this change in accounting principle retrospectively to financial periods presented prior to 2017.

Our next fiscal year ended December 31, 2016. However, we will restate previously issued financial statements when presenting financial statements under our new calendar in 2017.scheduled to include a 53rd week is 2024.

Foreign Currency.  The functional currency of our foreign entities is the currency of the primary economic environment in which the entity operates. Functional currency determinations are made based upon a number of economic factors, including but not limited to cash flows and financing transactions. The operations, assets and liabilities of our entities outside the United StatesU.S. are initially measured using the functional currency of that entity. Income and expense accounts for our operations of these foreign entities are then translated into U.S. dollars at the average exchange rates prevailing during the period. Assets and liabilities of these foreign entities are then translated into U.S. dollars at exchange rates in effect at the balance sheet date. As of December 31, 2016,2019, net cumulative translation adjustment losses of $313221 million are recorded in Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)loss ("AOCI") in the Consolidated Balance Sheet.

The majority of our foreign currency net asset exposure is in countries where we have company-ownedCompany-owned restaurants. As we manage and share resources at the individual brand level within a country, cumulative translation adjustments are recorded and tracked at the foreign-entity level that represents the operations of our individual brands within that country. Translation adjustments recorded in Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)AOCI are subsequently recognized as income or expense generally only upon sale of the related investment in a foreign entity, or upon a sale of assets and liabilities within a foreign entity that represents a complete or substantially complete liquidation of that foreign entity. For purposes of determining whether a sale or complete or substantially complete liquidation of an investment in a foreign entity has occurred, we consider those same foreign entities for which we record and track cumulative translation adjustments. See Note 5 for information on the liquidation of our Mexico and Pizza Hut Australia foreign entities and related Income Statement recognition of translation adjustments.

Gains and losses arising from the impact of foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations on transactions in foreign currency are included in Other (income) expense in our Consolidated Statements of Income.

Reclassifications. We have reclassified certain items in the Consolidated Financial Statements for prior periods to be comparable with the classification for the fiscal year ended December 31, 20162019. These reclassifications had no effect on previously reported Net Income.

Revenue Recognition. From 2014 through 2017, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued standards to provide principles within a single framework for revenue recognition of transactions involving contracts with customers across all industries ("Topic 606"). We adopted Topic 606 at the beginning of the year ended December 31, 2018. Below is a discussion of how our revenues are earned, our accounting policies pertaining to revenue recognition prior to the adoption of Topic 606 ("Legacy Revenue GAAP"), our accounting policies pertaining to revenue recognition subsequent to the adoption of Topic 606 and other required disclosures. Refer to Note 4 for information regarding the cumulative effect adjustment recorded to Accumulated deficit as of the


beginning of the year ended December 31, 2018 to reflect the adoption of Topic 606. Also included in Note 4 is disclosure of the amount by which each balance sheet and income statement line item was impacted in 2018 as compared to Legacy Revenue GAAP.

Company Sales

Revenues from the sale of food items by Company-owned restaurants are recognized as Company sales when a customer purchases the food, which is when our obligation to perform is satisfied. The timing and amount of revenue recognized related to Company sales was not impacted by the adoption of Topic 606.

Franchise Operations.  We executeand Property Revenues

Franchise Revenues

Our most significant source of revenues arises from the operation of our Concepts' stores by our franchisees. Franchise rights may be granted through a store-level franchise agreements for units operated by third parties which setagreement or through a master franchise agreement that sets out the terms of our arrangement with the franchisee. Additionally, we execute masterOur franchise agreements in certain regionsrequire that transfer administrative and development obligations and sub-franchising rightsthe franchisee remit continuing fees to us as a franchiseepercentage of the applicable restaurant’s sales in exchange for a reduced continuing fee.the license of the intellectual property associated with our Concepts' brands (the “franchise right”). Our franchise agreements also typically require certain, less significant, upfront franchise fees such as initial fees paid upon opening of a store, fees paid to renew the term of the franchise right and fees paid in the event the franchise agreement is transferred to another franchisee.

Continuing fees represent the substantial majority of the consideration we receive under our franchise agreements. Continuing fees are typically billed and paid monthly and are usually 4%-6% for store-level franchise agreements. Master franchise agreements allow master franchisees to operate restaurants as well as sub-franchise restaurants within certain geographic territories. The percentage of sales that we receive for restaurants owned or sub-franchised by our master franchisees as a continuing fee is typically less than the percentage we receive for restaurants operating under a store-level franchise agreement. Upfront franchise fees are typically billed and paid when a new franchise or sub-franchise agreement becomes effective or when an existing agreement is transferred to another franchisee or sub-franchisee.

Under Legacy Revenue GAAP, continuing fees were recognized as the related restaurant sales occurred. The timing and amount of revenue recognized related to pay ancontinuing fees was not impacted by the adoption of Topic 606 based on the application of the sales-based royalty exception within Topic 606. Under Legacy Revenue GAAP, revenue related to initial non-refundable feefees was recognized upon an individual store opening and renewal and transfer fees were recognized when the related agreement became effective. Upon the adoption of Topic 606, we have determined that the services we provide in exchange for these upfront franchise fees, which primarily relate to pre-opening support, are highly interrelated with the franchise right and are not individually distinct from the ongoing services we provide to our franchisees. As a result, upon the adoption of Topic 606, upfront franchise fees are recognized as revenue over the term of each respective franchise or sub-franchise agreement. Revenues for these upfront franchise fees are recognized on a straight-line basis, which is consistent with the franchisee’s or sub-franchisee's right to use and benefit from the intellectual property. Revenues from continuing fees and upfront franchise fees are presented within Franchise and property revenues in our Consolidated Statements of Income.

Additionally, from time-to-time we provide non-refundable consideration to franchisees in the form of cash or other incentives (e.g. cash payments to incent new unit openings, free or subsidized equipment, etc.). The Company’s intent in providing such consideration is to drive new unit development or same-store sales growth that will result in higher future revenues for the Company. Under Legacy Revenue GAAP, this consideration was recognized when we were obligated to provide the incentive and was presented as either a reduction to Franchise and property revenues, if cash was provided directly to the franchisee, or as Franchise and property expenses, if cash was not provided directly to the franchisee. Due to the adoption of Topic 606, such payments are capitalized and presented within Prepaid expense and other current assets or Other assets. These assets are being amortized as a reduction in Franchise and property revenues over the period of expected cash flows from the franchise agreements to which the payment relates.

Property Revenues

From time to time, we enter into rental agreements with franchisees for the lease or sublease of restaurant locations. These rental agreements typically originate from refranchising transactions and revenues related to the agreements are recognized as they are earned. Amounts owed under the rental agreements are typically billed and paid on a monthly basis. Revenues from rental agreements with franchisees are presented within Franchise and property revenues within our Consolidated Statements of Income. Related expenses are presented as Franchise and property expenses within our Consolidated Statements of Income and primarily


include depreciation or, in the case of a sublease, rental expense. The timing and amount of revenue and expenses recognized related to the rental of restaurants we lease or sublease was not impacted by the adoption of Topic 606.

Franchise Contributions for Advertising and Other Services

Advertising Cooperatives

Under Legacy Revenue GAAP, receipts and expenditures related to advertising cooperatives we were required to consolidate were presented on a net basis in our Consolidated Statements of Income and Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows. Additionally, assets and liabilities of the advertising cooperatives we were required to consolidate were presented within Advertising cooperative assets, restricted and Advertising cooperative liabilities, respectively, within our Consolidated Balance Sheets. In accordance with the provisions of Topic 606, we have determined we act as a principal in the transactions entered into by the advertising cooperatives we are required to consolidate based uponon our responsibility to define the nature of the goods or services provided and/or our responsibility to define which franchisees receive the benefit of the goods or services. Additionally, we have determined the advertising services provided to franchisees are highly interrelated with the franchise right and therefore not distinct. Franchisees remit to these consolidated advertising cooperatives a percentage of sales.  Subjectrestaurant sales as consideration for providing the advertising services. As a result, revenues for advertising services are recognized when the related restaurant sales occur based on the application of the sales-based royalty exception within Topic 606. Revenues for these services are typically billed and received on a monthly basis. These revenues are presented as Franchise contributions for advertising and other services. Expenses incurred to our approvalprovide these services are presented as Franchise advertising and their paymentother services expense. When revenues of an advertising cooperative exceed the related advertising expenses, advertising costs are accrued up to the amount of revenues on an annual basis. Lastly, upon adoption of Topic 606 we have reclassified assets and liabilities of advertising cooperatives we are required to consolidate to the respective balance sheet caption to which the assets and liabilities relate.

Other Services

On a renewal fee, a franchisee may generally renewmuch more limited basis, we provide goods or services to certain franchisees that are individually distinct from the franchise agreement upon its expiration.right because they do not require integration with other goods or services we provide. Such arrangements typically relate to supply chain, quality assurance and information technology services. In instances where we rely on third parties to provide goods or services to franchisees at our direction, we have determined we act as a principal in these transactions. The extent to which we provide such goods or services varies by brand, geographic region and, in some instances, franchisee. Similar to advertising services, receipts and expenditures related to these other services were presented on a net basis under Legacy Revenue GAAP. Upon adoption of Topic 606, revenues from the goods or services described above are presented as Franchise contributions for advertising and other services within our Consolidated Statements of Income. Expenses related to the provisioning of these goods and services are recorded in Franchise advertising and other services expense. These revenues are recognized as the goods or services are transferred to the franchisee and related expenses are recognized as incurred.

Franchise Support Costs

The internal costs we incur to provide support services to our franchisees for which we do not receive a direct reimbursement are charged to General and Administrativeadministrative expenses (“G&A”) expenses as incurred.  Certain direct costs of our franchise operations are charged to Franchise and licenseproperty expenses.  These costs include provisions for estimated uncollectible upfront and continuing fees, rent or depreciation expense associated with restaurants we lease or sublease to franchisees, franchise marketing funding, amortization expense for franchise-related intangible assets, value added taxes on royalties and certain other direct incremental franchise support costs.

Revenue Recognition.  Revenues from Company-owned restaurantsTaxes assessed by a governmental authority that are recognized when payment is tendered at the time of sale.  The Company presents sales net of sales-related taxes.  Income from our franchisees includes initial fees, continuing fees, renewal feesboth imposed on and rental income from restaurants we lease or sublease to them.  We recognize initial fees receivedconcurrent with a specific revenue transaction and collected from a franchisee ascustomer are excluded from revenue when we have performed substantially all initial services required by the franchise agreement, which is generally upon the opening of a store.  We recognize continuing fees, which are based upon a percentage of franchisee sales as those sales occurunder both Legacy Revenue GAAP and rental income is recognized as it is earned.  We recognize renewal fees when a renewal agreement with a franchisee becomes effective.  We present initial fees collected upon the sale of a Company-owned restaurant to a franchisee in Refranchising (gain) loss.

While the majority of our franchise agreements are entered into with terms and conditions consistent with those at a prevailing market rate, there are instances when we enter into franchise agreements with terms that are not at market rates (for example, below-market continuing fees) for a specified period of time. We recognize the estimated value of terms in franchise agreements entered into concurrently with a refranchising transaction that are not consistent with market terms as part of the upfront


refranchising gain (loss) and amortize that amount into Franchise and license fees and income over the period such terms are in effect. The value of terms that are not considered to be at market within franchise agreements is estimated based upon the difference between the present value of the cash expected to be received under the franchise agreement and the present value of the cash that would have been expected to be received under a franchise agreement with terms substantially consistent with market.Topic 606.

Direct Marketing Costs.  To the extent we participate in advertising cooperatives, we expense our contributions as incurred, which are based on a percentage of sales.sales of our Company restaurants.  We charge direct marketing costs incurred outside of a cooperative to expense ratably in relation to revenues over the year in which incurred and, in the case of advertising production costs, in the year the advertisement is first shown.  Deferred direct marketing costs, which are classified as prepaid expenses, consist of media and related advertising production costs whichthat will generally be used for the first time in the next fiscal year and have historically not been significant.  Our advertisingAdvertising expenses were $260incurred by our Company-owned restaurants are recorded within Company restaurant expenses and totaled $73 million,, $255 $96 million and $261$179 million in 2016, 20152019, 2018 and 2014,2017, respectively.  We report the vast majority of our direct marketing costs in Occupancy and other operatingAdvertising expenses as they are incurred as a percentage of sales by Company-owned restaurants. Advertising incurred on behalf of franchised restaurants isby the Company are recorded within Franchise and license expenses.property expenses and totaled $10 million, $35 million and $66 million in 2019, 2018 and 2017, respectively.  The amounts recorded within Franchise and property expenses include $12.5 million and $25 million related to the Pizza Hut U.S. Transformation Agreement


Researchin 2018 and Development Expenses.  Research2017, respectively, and development expenses, which$10 million and $20 million related to the KFC U.S. Acceleration Agreement in 2018 and 2017, respectively. See Note 4 for further discussion of these agreements. In 2019 and 2018 we expense as incurred an additional $1,133 million and $1,035 million, respectively, in spending attributable to franchise contributions to advertising cooperatives that we consolidate and are reported in G&A expenses.  Research and development expenses were $24 million, $24 million and $25 million in 2016, 2015 and 2014, respectively.now reporting on a gross basis within our Consolidated Statements of Income subsequent to the adoption Topic 606.

Share-Based Employee Compensation.  We recognize ongoing share-based payments to employees, including grants of employee stock options and stock appreciation rights (“SARs”), in the Consolidated Financial Statements as compensation cost over the service period based on their fair value on the date of grant.  This compensation cost is recognized over the service period on a straight-line basis, net of an assumed forfeiture rate, for awards that actually vest.  Forfeiture rates are estimated at grant date based on historical experience and compensation cost is adjusted in subsequent periods for differences in actual forfeitures from the previous estimates. We present this compensation cost consistent with the other compensation costs for the employee recipient in either Payroll and employee benefitsCompany restaurant expenses or G&A expenses.&A. See Note 1615 for further discussion of our share-based compensation plans.

Legal Costs. Settlement costs are accrued when they are deemed probable and reasonably estimable. Anticipated legal fees related to self-insured workers' compensation, employment practices liability, general liability, automobile liability, product liability and property losses (collectively, "property and casualty losses") are accrued when deemed probable and reasonably estimable. Legal fees not related to self-insured property and casualty losses are recognized as incurred. See Note 2019 for further discussion of our legal proceedings.

Impairment or Disposal of Property, Plant and Equipment.Long-Lived Assets.  Long-lived assets, including Property, plant and equipment (“PP&E”) isas well as right-of-use operating lease assets are tested for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value of the assets may not be recoverable.  The assets are not recoverable if their carrying value is less than the undiscounted cash flows we expect to generate from such assets.  If the assets are not deemed to be recoverable, impairment is measured based on the excess of their carrying value over their fair value.

For purposes of impairment testing for our restaurants, we have concluded that an individual restaurant is the lowest level of independent cash flows unless it is more likely than not that we will refranchise restaurants as a group.  We review our long-lived assets of such individual restaurants (primarily PP&E, right-of-use operating lease assets and allocated intangible assets subject to amortization) semi-annuallythat we intend to continue operating as Company restaurants annually for impairment, or whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of a restaurant may not be recoverable.  We use two consecutive years of operating losses as our primary indicator of potential impairment for our semi-annualannual impairment testing of these restaurant assets.  We evaluate the recoverability of these restaurant assets by comparing the estimated undiscounted future cash flows, which are based on our entity-specific assumptions, to the carrying value of such assets.  For restaurant assets that are not deemed to be recoverable, we write-down an impaired restaurant to its estimated fair value, which becomes its new cost basis.  Fair value is an estimate of the price a franchisee would pay for the restaurant and its related assets and is determined by discounting the estimated future after-tax cash flows of the restaurant, which include a deduction for royalties we would receive under a franchise agreement with terms substantially at market.  The after-tax cash flows incorporate reasonable assumptions we believe a franchisee would make such as sales growth and margin improvement.  The discount rate used in the fair value calculation is our estimate of the required rate of return that a franchisee would expect to receive when purchasing a similar restaurant and the related long-lived assets.  The discount rate incorporates rates of returns for historical refranchising market transactions and is commensurate with the risks and uncertainty inherent in the forecasted cash flows. Individual restaurant-level impairment is recorded within Other (income) expense.

In executing our refranchising initiatives, we most often offer groups of restaurants for sale.  When we believe it is more likely than not a restaurant or groups of restaurants will be refranchised for a price less than their carrying value, but do not believe the restaurant(s) have met the criteria to be classified as held for sale, we review the restaurants for impairment.  We evaluate the recoverability of these restaurant assets by comparing estimated sales proceeds plus holding period cash flows, if any, to the carrying value of the restaurant or group of restaurants.  For restaurant assets that are not deemed to be recoverable, we recognize impairment for any excess of carrying value over the fair value of the restaurants, which is based on the expected net sales


proceeds.  To the extent ongoing agreements to be entered into with the franchisee simultaneous with the refranchising are expected to contain terms, such as royalty rates, not at prevailing market rates, we consider the off-market terms in our impairment evaluation.  We recognize any such impairment charges in Refranchising (gain) loss.  Refranchising (gain) loss includes the gains or losses from the sales of our restaurants to new and existing franchisees, including any impairment charges discussed above, and the related initial franchise fees.associated termination, relocation or retention costs associated with store-level employees of refranchised stores or employees of restaurant-support centers which we have closed due to refranchising. We recognize gains on restaurant refranchisings when the sale transaction closes and control of the restaurant operations have transferred to the franchisee.



When we decide to close a restaurant, it is reviewed for impairment, andwhich includes an estimate of sublease income that could be reasonably obtained, if any, in relation to the right-of-use operating lease asset. Additionally, depreciable lives are adjusted based on the expected disposal date.  Other costs incurred when closing a restaurant such as costs of disposing of the assets as well as other facility-related expenses from previously closed stores are generally expensed as incurred.  Additionally, at the date we cease using a property under an operating lease, we record a liability for the net present value of any remaining lease obligations, net of estimated sublease income, if any.  Any costs recorded upon store closure as well as any subsequent adjustments to liabilities for remaining lease obligations as a result of lease termination or changes in estimates of sublease income are recorded in Closures and impairmentOther (income) expenses.expense.   To the extent we sell assets, primarily land, associated with a closed store, any gain or loss upon that sale is also recorded in Closures and impairmentOther (income) expenses.expense.

Considerable management judgment is necessary to estimate future cash flows, including cash flows from continuing use, terminal value, sublease income and refranchising proceeds.  Accordingly, actual results could vary significantly from our estimates.

Guarantees.  We recognize, at inception of a guarantee, a liability for the fair value of certain obligations undertaken.  The majority of our guarantees are issued as a result of assigning our interest in obligations under operating leases as a condition to the refranchising of certain Company restaurants.  We recognize a liability for the fair value of such lease guarantees upon refranchising and upon subsequent renewals of such leases when we remain contingentlysecondarily liable.  The related expense and any subsequent changes are included in Refranchising (gain) loss.  Any expense and subsequent changes in the guarantees for other franchise support guarantees not associated with a refranchising transaction are included in Franchise and license expense.property expenses.

Income Taxes.  We record deferred tax assets and liabilities for the future tax consequences attributable to temporary differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases as well as operating loss, capital loss and tax credit carryforwards. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those differences or carryforwards are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in our Income tax provision in the period that includes the enactment date.Additionally, in determining the need for recording a valuation allowance against the carrying amount of deferred tax assets, we consider the amount of taxable income and periods over which it must be earned, actual levels of past taxable income and known trends and events or transactions that are expected to affect future levels of taxable income. Where we determine that it is more likely than not that all or a portion of an asset will not be realized, we record a valuation allowance.

We recognize the benefit of positions taken or expected to be taken in our tax returns in our incomeIncome tax provision when it is more likely than not (i.e., a likelihood of more than fifty percent) that the position would be sustained upon examination by tax authorities. A recognized tax position is then measured at the largest amount of benefit that is greater than fifty percent likely of being realized upon settlement.settlement with the taxing authorities. We evaluate these amounts on a quarterly basis to ensure that they have been appropriately adjusted for audit settlements and other events we believe may impact the outcome. Changes in judgment that result in subsequent recognition, derecognition or a change in measurement of a tax position taken in a prior annual period (including any related interest and penalties) are recognized as a discrete item in the interim period in which the change occurs. We recognize accrued interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits as components of our incomeIncome tax provision.

We do not record a U.S. deferred tax liability for the excessunremitted earnings of the book basis over the tax basis of our investments in foreign subsidiaries to the extent that the basis difference results from earnings that meet the indefinite reversal criteria. This criteria is met if the foreign subsidiary has invested, or will invest, the undistributed earnings indefinitely. The decision as to the amount of undistributedunremitted earnings that we intend to maintain in non-U.S. subsidiaries considers items including, but not limited to, forecasts and budgets of financial needs of cash for working capital, liquidity plans and expected cash requirements in the United States.U.S.

See Note 1817 for a further discussion of our income taxes.

Fair Value Measurements.  Fair value is the price we would receive to sell an asset or pay to transfer a liability (exit price) in an orderly transaction between market participants.  For those assets and liabilities we record or disclose at fair value, we determine fair value based upon the quoted market price, if available.  If a quoted market price is not available for identical assets, we determine fair value based upon the quoted market price of similar assets or the present value of expected future cash flows considering the risks involved, including counterparty performance risk if appropriate, and using discount rates appropriate for


the duration.  The fair values are assigned a level within the fair value hierarchy, depending on the source of the inputs into the calculation.



Level 1Inputs based upon quoted prices in active markets for identical assets.
  
Level 2Inputs other than quoted prices included within Level 1 that are observable for the asset, either directly or indirectly.
  
Level 3Inputs that are unobservable for the asset.


Cash and Cash Equivalents.  Cash equivalents represent funds we have temporarily invested (with original maturities not exceeding three months), including short-term, highly liquid debt securities. Cash and overdraft balances that meet the criteria for right of setoff are presented net on our Consolidated Balance Sheet.

Receivables.  The Company’s receivables are primarily generated from ongoing business relationships with our franchisees as a result of franchise and lease agreements.  Tradeagreements, as well as contributions due to consolidated advertising cooperatives.  These receivables consisting of royalties from franchisees including Yum China, are generally due within 30 days of the period in which the corresponding sales occur and are classified as Accounts and notes receivable, net on our Consolidated Balance Sheet.  Yum China is our largest franchisee and we recorded franchise fee revenues of approximately $240 million from Yum China in 2016. Our provision for uncollectible franchisee receivable balances is based upon pre-defined aging criteria or upon the occurrence of other events that indicate that we may not collect the balance due.  Additionally, we monitor the financial condition of our franchisees and record provisions for estimated losses on receivables when we believe it probable that our franchisees will be unable to make their required payments.  While we use the best information available in making our determination, the ultimate recovery of recorded receivables is also dependent upon future economic events and other conditions that may be beyond our control.  We recorded $5 million and $3 million in net provisions within Franchise and license expenses in 2015 and 2014, respectively, related to uncollectible franchise and license trade receivables. Net provisions in 2016 related to uncollectible franchise and license trade receivables were less than $1 million. Trade receivablesReceivables that are ultimately deemed to be uncollectible, and for which collection efforts have been exhausted, are written off against the allowance for doubtful accounts.

We recorded $24 million, $11 million and $5 million in net provisions within Franchise and property expenses in 2019, 2018 and 2017, respectively, related to uncollectible continuing fees, initial fees and rent receivables from our franchisees. Additionally, in 2019 we recorded $19 million in net provisions within Franchise advertising and other services expense related to uncollectible franchisee receivables of advertising cooperatives we are required to consolidate. Our consolidated advertising cooperatives are required to spend contributions from franchisees and us on advertising. To the extent these cooperatives were unable to collect the approximately $1.1 billion in contributions due from participating franchisees in 2019 we recorded the aforementioned bad debt provision.  At the same time, we reduced advertising spending to the extent of these uncollectible franchise receivables. Thus, recorded advertising expense was reduced by the same amount as the bad debt provision within these consolidated advertising cooperatives and there was no net, direct impact to our Operating Profit in 2019. 
Accounts and notes receivable as well as the Allowance for doubtful accounts, including balances attributable to our consolidated advertising cooperatives, as of December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively, are as follows:
 2016 2015 2019 2018
Accounts and notes receivable $383
 $338
 $656
 $592
Allowance for doubtful accounts (13) (14) (72) (31)
Accounts and notes receivable, net $370
 $324
 $584
 $561

 
Our financing receivables primarily consist of notes receivables and direct financing leases with franchisees which we enter into from time-to-time.  As these receivables primarily relate to our ongoing business agreements with franchisees, we consider such receivables to have similar risk characteristics and evaluate them as one collective portfolio segment and class for determining the allowance for doubtful accounts.  We monitor the financial condition of our franchisees and record provisions for estimated losses on receivables when we believe it is probable that our franchisees will be unable to make their required payments.  Balances of notes receivable and direct financing leases due within one year are included in Accounts and notes receivable, net while amounts due beyond one year are included in Other assets.  Amounts included in Other assets totaled $21$68 million (net of an allowance of $2less than $1 million) and $16$62 million (net of an allowance of $4$1 million) at December 31, 20162019 and December 26, 2015,31, 2018, respectively.  Financing receivables that are ultimately deemed to be uncollectible, and for which collection efforts have been exhausted, are written off against the allowance for doubtful accounts.  Interest income recorded on financing receivables has historically been insignificant.

Inventories.  We value our inventories at the lower of cost (computed on the first-in, first-out method) or market.

Property, Plant and Equipment.  We state PP&E at cost less accumulated depreciation and amortization.  We calculate depreciation and amortization on a straight-line basis over the estimated useful lives of the assets as follows:  5 to 25 years for buildings and leasehold improvements and 3 to 20 years for machinery and equipment and 3 to 7 years for capitalized software costs.equipment.  We suspend depreciation and amortization on assets that are held for sale.



Leases and Leasehold Improvements.  Starting in February 2016 and continuing into 2019, the FASB issued standards on the recognition and measurement of leases ("Topic 842"). We adopted these standards at the beginning of the year ended December 31, 2019, using a modified retrospective transition approach for leases existing at, or entered into after, the beginning of 2019 and have not recast the comparative periods presented in the Consolidated Financial Statements. The Companystandards provide a number of optional practical expedients and policy elections in transition. We elected the ‘package of practical expedients’ under which we did not reassess under the standards our prior conclusions about lease identification, lease classification and initial direct costs. We did not elect the use-of-hindsight or the practical expedient pertaining to land easements. Refer to Note 4 for information regarding the adjustments recorded to our Consolidated Balance Sheet as of the beginning of the year ended December 31, 2019 to reflect the adoption of Topic 842. Below is information about the nature of our leases, accounting policies and assumptions subsequent to adopting Topic 842.

In certain instances, we lease or sublease certain restaurants to franchisees. Our lessor and sublease portfolio primarily consists of stores that have been leased to franchisees subsequent to refranchising transactions. Our most significant leases with lease and non-lease components are leases with our franchisees that include both the right to use a restaurant as well as a license of the intellectual property associated with our Concepts’ brands. For these leases, which are primarily classified as operating leases, we account for the lease and non-lease components separately. Revenues from rental agreements with franchisees are presented within Franchise and property revenues in our Consolidated Statements of Income and related expenses (e.g. depreciation and rent expense) are presented within Franchise and property expenses. The impact of adopting Topic 842 on the accounting for our lessor and sublease portfolio was not significant.

We lease land, buildings or both for certain of itsour Company-operated restaurants and restaurant support centers worldwide. Rental expense for leased Company-operated restaurants is presented in our Consolidated Statements of Income as Company restaurant expenses and rental expense for restaurant support centers is presented as G&A. The length of our lease terms, which vary by country and often include renewal options, are an important factor in determining the appropriate accounting for leases including the initial classification of the lease as capitalfinance (referred to as “capital” leases prior to the adoption of Topic 842) or operating andas well as the timing of recognition of rent expense over the duration of the lease. We include renewal option periods in


determining the term of our leases when failure to renew the lease would impose a penalty on the Company in such an amount that a renewal appears to be reasonably assuredcertain at the inceptioncommencement of the lease. The primary penalty to which we are subject is the economic detriment associated with the existence of leasehold improvements whichthat might be impaired if we choose not to continue the use of the leased property. Leasehold improvements are amortized over the shorter of their estimated useful lives or the lease term.  We generally do not receive leasehold improvement incentives upon opening a store that is subject to a lease.

We expense rent associated with leased land or buildings while a restaurant is being constructed whether rent is paid or we are subject to a rent holiday.  Additionally, certainOur leasing activity for other assets, including equipment, is not significant.

Prior to the adoption of Topic 842 (“Legacy Lease GAAP”) liabilities for future rental payments under operating leases were not recognized on the balance sheet of the Company'sCompany except when recognizing a liability was necessary to reflect the impact of recognizing rent expense on a straight-line basis. Upon the adoption of Topic 842, right-of-use assets and liabilities are recognized upon lease commencement for operating leases contain predetermined fixed escalationsbased on the present value of the minimum rent duringlease payments over the lease term. For leases with fixed escalatingSimilar assets and liabilities have historically always been recorded for finance leases. Right-of-use assets represent our right to use an underlying asset for the lease term and lease liabilities represent our obligation to make lease payments and/or rent holidays, we record rent expensearising from the lease. Subsequent amortization of the right-of-use asset and accretion of the lease liability for an operating lease is recognized as a single lease cost, on a straight-line basis, over the lease term. For finance leases, the right-of-use asset is depreciated on a straight-line basis over the lesser of the useful life of the leased asset or lease term. Interest on each finance lease liability is determined as the amount that results in a constant periodic discount rate on the remaining balance of the liability. As most of our leases do not provide an implicit discount rate, we use our incremental secured borrowing rate based on the information available at commencement date, including the lease term including any option periods consideredand currency, in determining the present value of lease payments for both operating and finance leases. Leases with an initial term of 12 months or less are not recorded in the determination of thatConsolidated Balance Sheet; we recognize lease term.  Contingent rentals are basedexpense for these leases on sales levels in excess of stipulated amounts, and thus are not considered minimuma straight-line basis over the lease payments and are included in rent expense when attainment of the contingency is considered probable (e.g. when Company sales occur).term.

Internal Development Costs and Abandoned Site Costs.  We capitalize direct costs associatedRight-of-use assets are assessed for impairment in accordance with our long-lived asset impairment policy, which is performed annually for restaurant-level assets or whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the site acquisition and constructioncarrying amount of a Company unit on that site, including direct internal payroll and payroll-related costs.  Only those site-specific costs incurred subsequent to the time that the site acquisition is considered probable are capitalized.  If we subsequently make a determination that it is probable a site for which internal development costs have been capitalized willrestaurant may not be acquiredrecoverable. We reassess lease classification and remeasure right-of-use assets and lease liabilities when a lease is modified and that modification is not accounted for as a separate new lease or developed, any previously capitalized internal development costs are expensedupon certain other events that require reassessment in accordance with Topic 842. The difference between operating lease rental expense recognized in our Consolidated Statements of Income and includedcash payments for operating leases is recognized within Other, net within Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities in G&A expenses.our Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows.

Goodwill and Intangible Assets.  From time-to-time, the Company acquires restaurants from one of our Concept’s franchisees or acquires another business.  Goodwill from these acquisitions represents the excess of the cost of a business acquired over the


net of the amounts assigned to assets acquired, including identifiable intangible assets and liabilities assumed.  Goodwill is not amortized and has been assigned to reporting units for purposes of impairment testing.  Our reporting units are our business units (which are aligned based on geography) in our KFC, Pizza Hut and Taco Bell Divisions.

We evaluate goodwill for impairment on an annual basis or more often if an event occurs or circumstances change that indicate impairment might exist.  We have selected the beginning of our fourth quarter as the date on which to perform our ongoing annual impairment test for goodwill. We may elect to perform a qualitative assessment for our reporting units to determine whether it is more likely than not that the fair value of the reporting unit is greater than its carrying value. If a qualitative assessment is not performed, or if as a result of a qualitative assessment it is not more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit exceeds its carrying value, then the reporting unit’s fair value is compared to its carrying value. Fair value is the price a willing buyer would pay for a reporting unit, and is generally estimated using discounted expected future after-tax cash flows from Company-owned restaurant operations, if any, and franchise royalties.  The discount rate is our estimate of the required rate of return that a third-party buyer would expect to receive when purchasing a business from us that constitutes a reporting unit.  We believe the discount rate is commensurate with the risks and uncertainty inherent in the forecasted cash flows.  If the carrying value of a reporting unit exceeds its fair value, goodwill is written down to its implied fair value.  

If we record goodwill upon acquisition of a restaurant(s) from a franchisee and such restaurant(s) is then sold within two years of acquisition, the goodwill associated with the acquired restaurant(s) is written off in its entirety.  If the restaurant is refranchised two years or more subsequent to its acquisition, we include goodwill in the carrying amount of the restaurants disposed of based on the relative fair values of the portion of the reporting unit disposed of in the refranchising and the portion of the reporting unit that will be retained.  The fair value of the portion of the reporting unit disposed of in a refranchising is determined by reference to the discounted value of the future cash flows expected to be generated by the restaurant and retained by the franchisee, which includes a deduction for the anticipated, future royalties the franchisee will pay us associated with the franchise agreement entered into simultaneously with the refranchising transition.  The fair value of the reporting unit retained is based on the price a willing buyer would pay for the reporting unit and includes the value of franchise agreements.  Appropriate adjustments are made if a franchise agreement includes terms that are determined to not be at prevailing market rates.  As such, the fair value of the reporting unit retained can include expected cash flows from future royalties from those restaurants currently being refranchised, future royalties from existing franchise businesses and company restaurant operations.  As a result, the percentage of a reporting unit’s goodwill that will be written off in a refranchising transaction will be less than the percentage of the reporting unit’s Company-owned restaurants that are refranchised in that transaction and goodwill can be allocated to a reporting unit with only franchise restaurants.

Our definite-lived intangible assets that are not allocated to an individual restaurant are evaluated for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of the intangible asset may not be recoverable.  An intangible asset that is deemed not recoverable on an undiscounted basis is written down to its estimated fair value, which is our estimate of the price a willing buyer would pay for the intangible asset based on discounted expected future after-tax cash flows.  For purposes of our impairment analysis, we update the cash flows that were initially used to value the definite-lived intangible asset to reflect our current estimates and assumptions over the asset’s future remaining life.



Capitalized Software. We state capitalized software at cost less accumulated amortization within Intangible assets, net on our Consolidated Balance Sheets. We calculate amortization on a straight line basis over the estimated useful life of the software which ranges from 3 to 7 years.

Derivative Financial Instruments. We use derivative instruments primarily to hedge interest rate and foreign currency risks. These derivative contracts are entered into with financial institutions. We do not use derivative instruments for trading purposes and we have procedures in place to monitor and control their use.

We record all derivative instruments on our Consolidated Balance Sheet at fair value. For derivative instruments that are designated and qualify as a cash flow hedge, the effective portion of the gain or loss on the derivative instrument is reported as a component of other comprehensive income (loss)AOCI and reclassified into earnings in the same period or periods during which the hedged transaction affects earnings. Any ineffective portion of the gain or loss on the derivative instrument for a cash flow hedge is recorded in the results of operations immediately. For derivative instruments not designated as hedging instruments, the gain or loss is recognized in the results of operations immediately.

As a result of the use of derivative instruments, the Company is exposed to risk that the counterparties will fail to meet their contractual obligations. To mitigate the counterparty credit risk, we only enter into contracts with carefully selected major financial institutions based upon their credit ratings and other factors, and continually assess the creditworthiness of counterparties. At December 31, 20162019 and December 26, 2015,31, 2018, all of the counterparties to our interest rate swaps, foreign currency swaps and foreign currency forwards had investment grade ratings according to the three major ratings agencies. To date, all counterparties have performed in accordance with their contractual obligations.



Common Stock Share Repurchases.  From time-to-time, we repurchase shares of our Common Stock under share repurchase programs authorized by our Board of Directors.  Shares repurchased constitute authorized, but unissued shares under the North Carolina laws under which we are incorporated.  Additionally, our Common Stock has no par or stated value.  Accordingly, we record the full value of share repurchases, or other deductions to Common Stock such as shares cancelled upon employee share-based award exercises, upon the trade date, against Common Stock on our Consolidated Balance Sheet except when to do so would result in a negative balance in such Common Stock account.  In such instances, on a period basis, we record the cost of any further share repurchases, or other deductions to Common Stock as a reduction in Retained earnings (Accumulated Deficit).an addition to Accumulated deficit.  Due to the large number of share repurchases of our stock over the past several years, our Common Stock balance is frequently zero at the end of any period.  Accordingly, $5,399$796 million, $1,1242,356 million and $725$1,915 million in share repurchases in 2019, 2018 and 2017, respectively, were recorded as a reductionan addition to Accumulated deficit. Additionally $18 million and $20 million related to shares cancelled upon employee share-based award exercises in Retained earnings (Accumulated Deficit) in 2016, 20152019 and 2014,2017 were recorded as an addition to Accumulated deficit, respectively. See Note 1716 for additional information on our share repurchases.

Pension and Post-retirement Medical Benefits. We measure and recognize the overfunded or underfunded status of our pension and post-retirement plans as an asset or liability in our Consolidated Balance Sheet as of our fiscal year end. The funded status represents the difference between the projected benefit obligations and the fair value of plan assets, which is calculated on a plan-by-plan basis. The projected benefit obligation and related funded status are determined using assumptions as of the end of each year. The projected benefit obligation is the present value of benefits earned to date by plan participants, including the effect of future salary increases, as applicable. The difference between the projected benefit obligations and the fair value of plan assets that has not previously been recognized in our Consolidated Statement of Income is recorded as a component of Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss).AOCI.

The net periodic benefit costs associated with the Company's defined benefit pension and post-retirement medical plans are determined using assumptions regarding the projected benefit obligation and, for funded plans, the market-related value of plan assets as of the beginning of each year.year, or remeasurement period, if applicable. We record the service cost component of net periodic benefit costs in G&A. Non-service cost components are recorded in Other pension (income) expense. We have elected to use a market-related value of plan assets to calculate the expected return on assets, net of administrative and investment fees paid from plan assets, in net periodic benefit costs. We recognize differences in the fair value versus the market-related value of plan assets evenly over five years. For each individual plan we amortize into pension expense the net amounts in Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss),AOCI, as adjusted for the difference between the fair value and market-related value of plan assets, to the extent that such amounts exceed 10% of the greater of a plan’s projected benefit obligation or market-related value of assets, over the remaining service period of active participants in the plan or, for plans with no active participants, over the expected average life expectancy of the inactive participants in the plan. The market-related value of plan assets is the fair value of plan assets as of the beginning of each year adjusted for variances between actual returns and expected returns. We attribute such variances to the market-related value of plan assets evenly over five years. We record a curtailment when an event occurs that significantly reduces the expected years of future service or eliminates the accrual of defined benefits for the future services of a significant number of employees. We record a curtailment gain when the employees who are entitled to the benefits terminate their employment; we record a curtailment loss when it becomes probable a loss will occur.

We recognize settlement gains or losses only when we have determined that the cost of all settlements in a year will exceed the sum of the service and interest costs within an individual plan.

Recently AdoptedRecent Accounting Pronouncements. In April 2015,June 2016, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB")FASB issued Accounting Standards Update ("ASU") No. 2015-03, “Interest - Imputationa standard that requires measurement and recognition of Interest: Simplifying the Presentation of Debt Issuance Costs” (ASU 2015-03). ASU 2015-03 amended the then current presentation guidance by requiring that debt issuance costs related to a recognized debt liability be presented in the balance sheet as a direct deduction from the carrying amount of that


debt liability, consistent with debt discounts. ASU 2015-03 wasexpected versus incurred credit losses for financial assets held. The standard is effective for the Company in our first quarter of fiscal 2020 and any impact upon adoption will be reflected through a cumulative-effect adjustment to Accumulated deficit as of the beginning withof 2020. We do not anticipate the quarter ended March 19, 2016. The adoptionimpact of adopting this standard required restatement of our Consolidated Balance Sheet as of December 26, 2015. As a result, Other assets and Long-term debt each decreased by $13 million and Prepaid expenses and other current assets and Short-term borrowings each decreased by $1 million versus amounts previously reported.

In November 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-18, Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230): Restricted Cash. ASU 2016-18 requires entitieswill be material to show the changes in the total of cash, cash equivalents, restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents in the statement of cash flows. We adopted ASU 2016-18 beginning with the quarter ended December 31, 2016 on a retrospective basis. As a result Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities from Continuing Operations increased by $5 million in 2015. End-of-period cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash increased by $21 million and $16 million as of December 26, 2015 and December 27, 2014, respectively. We classify restricted cash within our Consolidated Balance Sheets consistent with the nature of the restriction (e.g. cash restricted for future interest payments within the next 12 months is classified in Prepaid expenses and other current assets).

In August 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-15, Presentation of Financial Statements-Going Concern (Subtopic 205-40). ASU 2014-15 requires management to evaluate whether there are conditions or events, considered in the aggregate, that raise substantial doubt about the entity’s ability to continue as a going concern for a period of one year following the date its financial statements are issued. If such conditions or events exist, an entity should disclose that there is substantial doubt about the entity’s ability to continue as a going concern for a period of one year following the date its financial statements are issued. Disclosure should include the principal conditions or events that raise substantial doubt, management’s evaluation of the significance of those conditions or events in relation to the entity’s ability to meet its obligations, and management’s plans that are intended to mitigate those conditions or events. We adopted ASU 2014-15 effective December 31, 2016. The adoption had no impact on our Consolidated Financial Statements.




Note 3 – Earnings Per Common Share (“EPS”)

 2016 2015 2014 2019 2018 2017
Income from continuing operations $994
 $936
 $1,006
Income from discontinued operations 625
 357
 45
Net Income $1,619

$1,293

$1,051
 $1,294

$1,542

$1,340
Weighted-average common shares outstanding (for basic calculation) 394
 436
 444
 306
 322
 347
Effect of dilutive share-based employee compensation 6
 7
 9
 7
 7
 8
Weighted-average common and dilutive potential common shares outstanding (for diluted calculation) 400
 443
 453
 313
 329
 355
Basic EPS from continuing operations $2.52
 $2.15
 $2.27
Basic EPS from discontinued operations 1.59
 0.82
 0.10
      
Basic EPS $4.11

$2.97

$2.37
 $4.23

$4.80

$3.86
Diluted EPS from continuing operations $2.48
 $2.11
 $2.22
Diluted EPS from discontinued operations 1.56
 0.81
 $0.10
      
Diluted EPS $4.04

$2.92

$2.32
 $4.14

$4.69

$3.77
Unexercised employee stock options and stock appreciation rights (in millions) excluded from the diluted EPS computation(a)
 5.0
 4.5
 5.5
 2.0
 2.0
 2.3

(a)These unexercised employee stock options and stock appreciation rights were not included in the computation of diluted EPS because to do so would have been antidilutive for the periods presented.

Note 4 - Discontinued Operations

As discussed in Note 1, on October 31, 2016, the Company completed the Separation of our China business.

In connection with the Separation, the Company and Yum China entered into a Separation and Distribution Agreement as well as various other agreements that provide a framework for the relationships between the parties, including among others a Tax Matters


Agreement, an Employee Matters Agreement, a Transition Services Agreement and a Master License Agreement. These agreements provided for the allocation between the Company and Yum China of assets, employees, liabilities and obligations (including investments, property, employee benefits and tax-related assets and liabilities) attributable to periods prior to, at and after the Separation and govern certain relationships between the Company and Yum China after the Separation.

For all the periods prior to the Separation, the financial results of Yum China are presented as Income from discontinued operations, net of tax in the Consolidated Statements of Income, Assets and Liabilities of discontinued operations in the Consolidated Balance Sheets and Cash flows from discontinued operations in our Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows.

Prior to the Separation, an intercompany franchise agreement existed between an entity of Yum China and a Company entity requiring Yum China to remit to the Company royalties on sales earned by KFC and Pizza Hut Company-owned stores in China. The royalties related to the franchise agreement were eliminated as intercompany transactions and were not separately reflected in our previously issued financial statements. Additionally, third-party franchisees of Yum China paid to a Company entity royalties as a percentage of their sales. We have restated the results of our KFC and Pizza Hut Divisions for periods prior to the Separation to reflect the royalties that were previously eliminated as intercompany transactions and related taxes that were previously included in our China Division results. We have also restated the results of our KFC and Pizza Hut Divisions to include the royalties paid by third-party franchisees previously included in China Division results that will be continued pursuant to the Master License Agreement following the Separation. For 2016, 2015, and 2014 the combined impact to our KFC and Pizza Hut Divisions' Franchise and license fees and income was $208 million, $244 million, and $242 million, respectively. The value added tax associated with this royalty revenue was recorded as an increase in Franchise and license expenses and the combined impact to our KFC and Pizza Hut Divisions' Franchise and license expense totaled $13 million, $16 million and $16 million in 2016, 2015 and 2014, respectively. The net increases in the KFC and Pizza Hut Divisions' Operating Profit were offset with a corresponding reduction in Income from discontinued operations such that there is no impact on total reported Net income. Subsequent to the Separation, all royalty revenues earned by us under the Master License Agreement with Yum China are reflected as Franchise and license fees and income in our Consolidated Statements of Income. Cash inflows from Yum China to the Company from the date of Separation through the end of 2016 related to the Master License Agreement were $16 million and primarily related to royalty revenues.

The financial results of Yum China presented in discontinued operations reflect the results of the former China Division, an operating segment of the Company until the Separation, adjusted for the transactions discussed above and the inclusion of certain G&A expenses, non-cash impairment charges, refranchising gains, interest and taxes that were previously not allocated to but were related to the former China Division's historical results of operations. The following table presents the financial results of the Company’s discontinued operations:
  
2016(a)
 2015 2014
Company sales $5,667
 $6,789
 $6,821
Franchise and license fees and income 109
 120
 113
Company restaurant expenses (4,766) (5,913) (6,011)
G&A expenses(b)
 (406) (405) (391)
Franchise and license expenses (45) (48) (44)
Closures and impairment expenses(c)
 (57) (64) (517)
Refranchising gain 12
 13
 17
Other income(d)
 49
 27
 52
Interest income, net 8
 7
 13
Income from discontinued operations before income taxes 571
 526
 53
Income tax benefit (provision)(e)
 65
 (164) (38)
Income from discontinued operations - including noncontrolling interests 636
 362
 15
(Income) loss from discontinued operations - noncontrolling interests (11) (5) 30
Income from discontinued operations - YUM! Brands, Inc. $625
 $357
 $45

(a)Includes Yum China financial results from January 1, 2016 to October 31, 2016.

(b)Includes costs incurred to execute the Separation of $68 million and $9 million for 2016 and 2015, respectively. Such costs primarily relate to transaction advisors, legal and other consulting fees.



(c)During 2014, we recorded a $463 million non-cash impairment charge related to the investment in China's Little Sheep restaurant business. The tax benefit associated with these losses of $76 million and the losses allocated to the noncontrolling founding shareholder of $26 million resulted in a net impact of $361 million on Income from discontinued operations - YUM! Brands, Inc.

(d)Primarily relates to equity income from KFC franchisees in which Yum China owns a minority interest.

(e)During 2016, we recorded a tax benefit of $233 million related to previously recorded losses associated with our Little Sheep business. The tax benefit associated with these losses was able to be recognized as a result of legal entity restructuring completed in anticipation of the Separation.

The assets, liabilities and redeemable noncontrolling interest related to Yum China and presented as discontinued operations in our Consolidated Balance Sheets are as follows:
  2015
Cash and cash equivalents $424
Accounts and notes receivable, net 53
Inventories 189
Prepaid expenses and other current assets 108
Current assets of discontinued operations 774
   
Property, plant and equipment, net 1,841
Goodwill 85
Intangible assets, net 107
Investments in unconsolidated affiliates 61
Other assets 192
Deferred income taxes 85
Noncurrent assets of discontinued operations 2,371
Total assets classified as discontinued operations $3,145
   
Accounts payable and other current liabilities $912
Income taxes payable 22
Current liabilities of discontinued operations 934
   
Long-term debt 34
Other liabilities and deferred credits 213
Non-current liabilities of discontinued operations 247
Total liabilities classified as discontinued operations $1,181
   
Redeemable noncontrolling interest $6


Assets and liabilities transferred to Yum China upon Separation at October 31, 2016 were $3,363 million and $1,310 million, respectively. At October 31, 2016, there were 5,898 stores owned and operated by our China business. Subsequent to the Separation, 5,859 of these stores owned by Yum China will be reflected as KFC or Pizza Hut franchise units within YUM's total unit count. The remaining 39 stores, as well as 211 stores that were franchise-operated stores in our China business on the date of separation relate to the Little Sheep and East Dawning concepts and are now excluded from YUM's unit counts as we have no ongoing association with those concepts.

Note 54 Items Affecting Comparability of Net Income and Cash Flows

Refranchising (Gain) Loss

The Refranchising (gain) loss by our Divisional reportable segmentsegments is presented below. WeGiven the size and volatility of refranchising initiatives, our chief operating decision maker ("CODM") does not consider the impact of Refranchising (gain) loss when assessing Divisional segment performance. As such, we do not allocate such gains and losses to our Divisional segments for performance reporting purposes.

During the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017, we refranchised 25, 660 and 1,470 restaurants, respectively.  Additionally, during the year ended December 31, 2019, we sold certain restaurant assets associated with existing franchise restaurants to the franchisee. We received $110 million, $825 million and $1,773 million in pre-tax refranchising proceeds in 2019, 2018 and 2017, respectively.

A summary of Refranchising (gain) loss is as follows:

  Refranchising (gain) loss     
  2019 2018 2017     
KFC Division $(6) $(240) $(581)     
Pizza Hut Division 
 13
 (16)     
Taco Bell Division (31) (313) (486)     
Worldwide $(37) $(540) $(1,083)     


As a result of classifying restaurant and related assets as held for sale and ceasing depreciation expense, depreciation expense was reduced versus what would have otherwise been recorded by less than $1 million, $3 million and $10 million during the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017, respectively. Our CODM does not consider the impact of these depreciation reductions, which were recorded within Company restaurant expenses, when assessing Divisional segment performance. These depreciation reductions were recorded as an unallocated benefit and were not allocated to the Division segments resulting in depreciation expense continuing to be recorded within our Divisional results at the rate at which it was prior to the held for sale classification.

Pizza Hut U.S. Transformation Agreement

In May 2017, we reached an agreement with Pizza Hut U.S. franchisees that will improve brand marketing alignment, accelerate enhancements in operations and technology and that included a permanent commitment to incremental advertising as well as digital and technology contributions by franchisees (the “Transformation Agreement”). In connection with the Transformation Agreement we anticipate investing approximately $90 million from 2017 to 2020 to upgrade restaurant equipment to improve operations,



fund improvements in restaurant technology and enhance digital and e-commerce capabilities. As of December 31, 2019, we have invested $89 million since the inception of the agreement.
  Refranchising (gain) loss     
  2016 2015 2014     
KFC Division(a)
 $(20) $33
 $(18)     
Pizza Hut Division(a)(b)
 (50) 55
 6
     
Taco Bell Division (71) (65) (4)     
Worldwide $(141) $23
 $(16)     

(a)In 2010, we refranchised our then-remaining Company-operated restaurants in Mexico. To the extent we owned it, we did not sell the real estate related to certain of these restaurants, instead leasing it to the franchisee. During 2015, we sold the real estate for approximately $58 million. While these proceeds exceeded the book value of the real estate, the sale represented a substantial liquidation of our Mexican foreign entities under GAAP. As such, the accumulated translation losses associated with our Mexican business were included in our loss on the sale. We recorded charges of $80 million representing the excess of the sum of the book value of the real estate and other related assets and our accumulated translation losses over the sales price. Consistent with the classification of the original Mexico market-wide refranchising transaction, these charges were classified as Refranchising (gain) loss. Refranchising losses of $40 million were associated with both the KFC and Pizza Hut Divisions.

We continuehave invested $25 million,  $25 million and $39 million for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017, respectively, related to earnthe Transformation Agreement. These amounts consisted of capital investments and franchisee incentive payments that were capitalized.  Also included are operating investments of $13 million, $6 million and $31 million in the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017, respectively.

Due to their unique and long-term brand-building nature as well as their non-recurring impact on Pizza Hut’s Division results, the financial impact of operating investments that are part of the Transformation Agreement are not being considered by our CODM when assessing segment performance.  As such, these operating investments are not being allocated to the Pizza Hut Division operating segment results for performance reporting purposes. 

Depreciation on capital investments made as part of the Transformation Agreement is being allocated to Pizza Hut segment results as the expense is recurring and is not expected to significantly impact the comparability of results in any given period.  For the same reasons, the amortization related to capitalized franchisee incentive payments is being allocated to Pizza Hut Division operating segment results.

In addition to the investments above, we funded $37.5 million of incremental system advertising from the second half of 2017 through 2018, including $12.5 million and $25 million we incurred during the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively. These advertising amounts were recorded primarily in Franchise and property expenses and were included in the Pizza Hut Division segment operating results.

KFC U.S. dollar-denominated franchise fees, most of which are sales-based royalties, under our existing franchise contractsAcceleration Agreement

During 2015, we reached an agreement with our Mexico franchisee.KFC U.S. franchisees that gave us control of brand marketing execution as well as an accelerated path to expanded menu offerings, improved assets and enhanced customer experience.  In connection with this agreement we invested approximately $130 million from 2015 through 2019. These investments, which primarily related to new back-of-house equipment for franchisees and incentives to accelerate franchisee store remodels, totaled $6 million, $6 million and $17 million in the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017, respectively. To the extent these investments were not capitalized ($2 million in 2018 and $17 million in 2017) the financial impacts of the investments were not considered by our CODM when assessing segment performance. As such, these investments are not being allocated to the KFC Division operating segment results for performance reporting purposes. As of December 31, 2019 the initiatives related to this program are substantially complete.
In addition to the investments above, we funded $60 million of incremental system advertising from 2015 through 2018, including $10 million and $20 million incurred during the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively. These advertising amounts were recorded primarily in Franchise and property expenses and were included in the KFC Division segment operating results.

(b)In 2016, we recognized a net gain of $11 million related to the reclassification of accumulated translation adjustments associated with Pizza Hut Australia upon entering into a master franchising agreement for that business that was deemed a complete liquidation of the Pizza Hut Australia foreign entity.
Turkey Acquisition Contingent Consideration

During the second quarter of 2019 we recorded charges of $8 million and $2 million to Other (income) expense and Interest expense, net, respectively, related to cash payments in excess of our recorded liability to settle contingent consideration associated with our 2013 acquisition of the KFC Turkey and Pizza Hut Turkey businesses.  Consistent with prior adjustments to the recorded contingent consideration, our CODM does not consider this charge when assessing segment performance due to the nature of these costs.  As such, these costs were not allocated to any of our segment operating results for performance reporting purposes.

Investment in Grubhub, Inc. ("Grubhub")

On February 7, 2018, certain of our subsidiaries entered into a master services agreement with a subsidiary of Grubhub, an online and mobile takeout food-ordering company in the U.S., which is intended to provide dedicated support for the KFC and Taco Bell branded online delivery channels in the U.S. through Grubhub’s online ordering platform, logistics and last-mile support for delivery orders, as well as point-of-sale integration to streamline operations. Concurrently with the master services agreement, one of our subsidiaries entered into an investment agreement with Grubhub to invest $200 million in exchange for approximately 2.8 million shares of Grubhub common stock, subject to customary closing conditions. In April 2018, all necessary regulatory approvals were obtained and the purchase of Grubhub shares was consummated. Shares acquired as part of this purchase are restricted from being transferred until the earlier of the two-year anniversary of closing the investment agreement or 30 days following the termination of our master services agreement with Grubhub. In the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018 we recognized pre-tax expense of $77 million and pre-tax income of $14 million, respectively, related to the mark-to-market of these


shares, which includes the respective depreciation and appreciation in the market price of Grubhub common stock. Changes in the fair value of our investment in Grubhub common stock are presented as Investment (income) expense, net within our Consolidated Statements of Income.

Income Tax Matters

During the year ended December 31, 2019 we completed intercompany transfers of certain intellectual property rights. As a result of the transfer of certain of these rights, largely to subsidiaries in the United Kingdom, we received a step-up in tax basis to current fair value under applicable tax law. To the extent this step-up in basis will be amortizable against future taxable income, we recognized a one-time deferred tax benefit of $226 million in the year ended December 31, 2019.

We recognized $434 million in our Income tax provision for the year ended December 31, 2017 as a result of the December 22, 2017 enactment of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 ("Tax Act"). During the year ended December 31, 2018, we recorded a $35 million decrease related to our provisional tax expense recorded in the fourth quarter of 2017 associated with the Tax Act.

See Note 17. 

YUM's Strategic Transformation Initiatives

In October 2016, we announced our strategic transformation plans to drive global expansion of the KFC, Pizza Hut and Taco Bell brands ("YUM's Strategic Transformation InitiativesInitiatives") following the Separation.then anticipated spin-off of our China business (the "Separation") on October 31, 2016 into an independent, publicly-traded company under the name of Yum China Holdings, Inc. ("Yum China"). Major features of the Company’s strategic transformation plans involveinvolved being more focused on the development of our three brands, increasing our franchise ownership and creating a leaner, more efficient cost structure. We incurred pre-tax costs of $71$8 million and $23 million related to our Strategic Transformation Initiatives in 2016. These costs,2018 and 2017, respectively, primarily recorded in G&A expenses,&A. In 2018 and 2017, these costs included contract termination costs and relocation and severance costs charges associated with a voluntary retirement program offered to certain U.S. employees, consulting costs incurred to facilitate YUM's Strategic Transformation Initiatives and losses associated with the sale of Corporate aircraft upon our decision to no longer own our own aircraft. YUM's Strategic Transformation Initiatives represent the continuation of YUM's transformation of its operating model and capital structure following the Separation and recapitalization of YUM.for restaurant-support center employees. Due to the scope of the initiatives as well as their significance, our CODM did not consider the associated cost when assessing segment performance. As such, these costs associated with these initiatives arewere not being allocated to any of our segment operating results for performance reporting.reporting purposes.

Modifications of Share-based Compensation Awards

In connection with the Separation, we modified certain share-based compensation awards held as part of our Executive Income Deferral ("EID") Plan in phantom shares of YUM Common Stock to provide one phantom Yum China share-based award for each outstanding phantom YUM share-based award. TheseThrough October 31, 2018, these Yum China awards may nowcould be settled in cash, as opposed to stock, which requiresrequired recognition of the fair value of these awards each quarterwithin G&A in our income statement. Cumulative fair value in excessConsolidated Income Statement. During 2018 and 2017, we recorded pre-tax credits of previously recorded expense as of December 31, 2016,$3 million and related costs resulted in non-cash pre-tax charges of $30$18 million, being recordedrespectively, related to G&A expensethese awards due to changes in 2016. These costs arethe market price of Yum China's common stock. Given these adjustments were a direct result of the separation of our China business, our CODM did not beingconsider their impact when assessing segment performance. As such, these amounts were not allocated to any of our segment operating results.

Beginning October 31, 2018, deferrals in phantom shares of Yum China common stock were no longer an investment option within our EID Plan and any balances relating to these phantom shares were moved to another available EID Plan investment option as selected by the participants.  Amounts directed into cash or phantom shares of a Stock Index Fund or a Bond Index Fund remained classified as a liability and any appreciation or depreciation in these investments from the transfer date forward is being recognized as compensation expense and included in our segment operating results given theyconsistent with existing investments in these funds. Any balances directed into phantom shares of YUM Common Stock were a direct resultreclassified to Common Stock on our Consolidated Balance Sheet.  We do not recognize compensation expense for the appreciation or depreciation, if any, of the Separation.investments in phantom shares of our Common Stock. See Note 1615 for further discussiondescription of share-based and deferred compensation plans.our EID Plan.

KFC U.S. Acceleration Agreement

During 2015, we reached an agreement with our KFC U.S. franchisees that gave us brand marketing control as well as an accelerated path to expanded menu offerings, improved assets and enhanced customer experience. In connection with this agreement we anticipate investing a total of approximately $120 million from 2015 through 2018 primarily to fund new back-of house equipment for franchisees and to provide incentives to accelerate franchisee store remodels. We recorded pre-tax charges for the portion of these investments made in 2016 and 2015 of $26 million and $72 million, respectively. These amounts were recorded primarily as Franchise and license expenses and are not being allocated to the KFC Division segment operating results.


Impact of Adopting New Lease Standards

In additionAs discussed in Note 2, we adopted Topic 842 at the beginning of the year ended December 31, 2019, using a modified retrospective method. Topic 842 was applied to all leases existing at, or entered into after, the beginning of 2019. As a result of adopting Topic 842, the following adjustments were made to the investments above we agreed to fund $60 millionConsolidated Balance Sheet as of incremental system advertising. During 2016the beginning of the year ended December 31, 2019:
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET
 As Reported 12/31/2018 Adjustments Balances with Adoption of Topic 842 1/1/2019
ASSETS     
Current Assets     
Cash and cash equivalents$292
 $
 $292
Accounts and notes receivable, net561
 
 561
Prepaid expenses and other current assets354
 (10) 344
Total Current Assets1,207
 (10) 1,197
      
Property, plant and equipment, net1,237
 
 1,237
Goodwill525
 
 525
Intangible assets, net242
 
 242
Other assets724
 689
 1,413
Deferred income taxes195
 
 195
Total Assets$4,130
 $679
 $4,809
      
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ DEFICIT     
Current Liabilities     
Accounts payable and other current liabilities$911
 $76
 $987
Income taxes payable69
 
 69
Short-term borrowings321
 
 321
Total Current Liabilities1,301
 76
 1,377
      
Long-term debt9,751
 
 9,751
Other liabilities and deferred credits1,004
 605
 1,609
Total Liabilities12,056
 681
 12,737
      
Shareholders’ Deficit     
Accumulated deficit(7,592) (2) (7,594)
Accumulated other comprehensive loss(334) 
 (334)
Total Shareholders’ Deficit(7,926) (2) (7,928)
Total Liabilities and Shareholders’ Deficit$4,130
 $679
 $4,809

We recorded lease liabilities within Accounts payable and 2015, we incurred $20other current liabilities and Other liabilities and deferred credits of $83 million and $661 million, respectively, related to the present value of the remaining operating lease payments. These adjustments were partially offset by reductions to Accounts payable and other current liabilities and Other liabilities and deferred credits of $7 million and $56 million, respectively, primarily related to the write offs of liabilities previously recorded to reflect the impact of recognizing rent expense on a straight-line basis when lease payments were escalating under Legacy Lease GAAP. Additionally, lease liabilities recognized upon adoption were offset by the write-off of prepaid rent of $11 million that was recorded under Legacy Lease GAAP resulting in a decrease within Prepaid expenses and other current assets and Other assets of $10 million and $1 million, respectively.

We recorded a corresponding right-of-use asset within Other Assets of $690 million. This right-of-use asset reflected a $2 million impairment charge that would have been recorded before adoption of Topic 842 had the right-of-use asset been recognized under Legacy Lease GAAP. A related increase was recorded in incremental systemAccumulated deficit.



Impact of Adopting New Revenue Recognition Standards

As discussed in Note 2, we adopted Topic 606 at the beginning of the year ended December 31, 2018, using the modified retrospective method. Topic 606 was applied to all contracts with customers as of January 1, 2018 and the cumulative effective of this transition was recorded as an adjustment to Accumulated deficit as of this date. As a result, the following adjustments were made to the Consolidated Balance Sheet as of January 1, 2018:

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET      
 As Reported 12/31/2017 Adjustments  Balances with Adoption of Topic 606 1/1/2018
ASSETS      
Current Assets      
Cash and cash equivalents$1,522
 $11
  $1,533
Accounts and notes receivable, net400
 112
  512
Prepaid expenses and other current assets384
 76
(a) 
 460
Advertising cooperative assets, restricted201
 (201)  
Total Current Assets2,507
 (2)  2,505
 

 

  

Property, plant and equipment, net1,594
 2
  1,596
Goodwill512
 
  512
Intangible assets, net214
 9
  223
Other assets345
 118
  463
Deferred income taxes139
 26
  165
Total Assets$5,311
 $153
  $5,464
 
 
  
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ DEFICIT
 
  
Current Liabilities
 
  
Accounts payable and other current liabilities$813
 $220
  $1,033
Income taxes payable123
 
  123
Short-term borrowings375
 
  375
Advertising cooperative liabilities201
 (201)  
Total Current Liabilities1,512
 19
  1,531
 

 

  

Long-term debt9,429
 
  9,429
Other liabilities and deferred credits704
 353
  1,057
Total Liabilities11,645
 372
  12,017
 
 
  
Shareholders’ Deficit
 
  
Accumulated deficit(6,063) (240)  (6,303)
Accumulated other comprehensive loss(271) 21
  (250)
Total Shareholders’ Deficit(6,334) (219)  (6,553)
Total Liabilities and Shareholders’ Deficit$5,311
 $153
  $5,464

(a)Includes $58 million of restricted cash related to advertising cooperatives. These balances can only be used to settle obligations of the respective cooperatives.

We recorded an increase in Accounts payable and other current liabilities and Other liabilities and deferred credits of $57 million and $335 million, respectively, as part of our cumulative adjustment related to unamortized upfront franchise fees, with a corresponding $392 million increase in Accumulated deficit. We recorded increases in Prepaid expenses and other current assets and Other assets of $18 million and $118 million, respectively, as part of our cumulative adjustment related to unamortized franchise incentives, with a corresponding $136 million decrease in Accumulated deficit.



Deferred income taxes increased $26 million as a result of recording the tax effects of the two adjustments noted above, with a corresponding decrease to Accumulated deficit. Accumulated other comprehensive loss decreased $21 million as a result of recognizing the impact of foreign currency translation related to the three adjustments noted above, with a corresponding increase in Accumulated deficit.

The remaining adjustments to our December 31, 2017 Consolidated Balance Sheet are primarily a result of reclassifying the assets and liabilities of our consolidated advertising cooperative from Advertising cooperative assets, restricted and Advertising cooperative liabilities to the respective balance sheet caption to which the assets and liabilities relate.

The following tables reflect the impact of the adoption of Topic 606 on our Consolidated Statement of Income for the year ended December 31, 2018 and our Consolidated Balance Sheet as of December 31, 2018.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF INCOME      
 Year ended 12/31/2018
RevenuesAs Reported Impact  Balances under Legacy Revenue GAAP
Company sales$2,000
 $
  $2,000
Franchise and property revenues2,482
 43
  2,525
Franchise contributions for advertising and other services1,206
 (1,206)  
Total revenues5,688
 (1,163)  4,525
Costs and Expenses, Net      
Company restaurant expenses1,634
 
  1,634
General and administrative expenses895
 
  895
Franchise and property expenses188
 27
  215
Franchise advertising and other services expense1,208
 (1,208)  
Refranchising (gain) loss(540) 4
  (536)
Other (income) expense7
 
  7
Total costs and expenses, net3,392
 (1,177)  2,215
Operating Profit2,296
 14
(a) 
 2,310
Investment (income) expense, net(9) 
  (9)
Other pension (income) expense14
 
  14
Interest expense, net452
 
  452
Income before income taxes1,839
 14
  1,853
Income tax provision (benefit)297
 3
  300
Net Income$1,542
 $11
  $1,553
       
Basic Earnings Per Common Share$4.80
 $0.03
  $4.83
       
Diluted Earnings Per Common Share$4.69
 $0.03
  $4.72
       

(a)Includes $23 million of franchise incentive payments made to or on behalf of franchisees during 2018 that under Legacy Revenue GAAP would have been recognized as expense in full in 2018. Due to the size and nature of such payments, we historically would not have allocated their impact to our Divisional results. Upon the adoption of Topic 606, these payments have been capitalized as assets.

Upon the adoption of Topic 606, the timing and amount of revenue recognized for upfront franchise fees and franchise incentives changed from upfront recognition under Legacy Revenue GAAP to recognition over the term of the franchise agreement to which the fees and incentives relate. Also, under Legacy Revenue GAAP, amounts reported as Franchise contributions for advertising and other services and Franchise advertising and other services expense respectively, withwere presented on a net basis. Upon the remaining funding to occuradoption of Topic


606, these amounts require gross presentation in 2017our Consolidated Statements of Income. Lastly, Legacy Revenue GAAP required that certain value-added taxes withheld and 2018. The amounts recorded were primarilyremitted on our behalf by our franchisees be reported as revenue and corresponding expense in our Consolidated Statements of Income. Upon adoption of Topic 606, these taxes are reported on a net basis as a reduction in Franchise and license expenses and are included in the KFC Division segment operating results.property revenues.

YUM Retirement Plan Settlement Charge
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET
 As Reported 12/31/2018 Impact Balances under Legacy Revenue GAAP 12/31/2018
ASSETS     
Current Assets     
Cash and cash equivalents$292
 $(13) $279
Accounts and notes receivable, net561
 (120) 441
Prepaid expenses and other current assets354
 (107) 247
Advertising cooperative assets, restricted
 241
 241
Total Current Assets1,207
 1
 1,208
      
Property, plant and equipment, net1,237
 (2) 1,235
Goodwill525
 
 525
Intangible assets, net242
 (16) 226
Other assets724
 (127) 597
Deferred income taxes195
 (25) 170
Total Assets$4,130
 $(169) $3,961
      
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ DEFICIT     
Current Liabilities     
Accounts payable and other current liabilities$911
 $(287) $624
Income taxes payable69
 
 69
Short-term borrowings321
 
 321
Advertising cooperative liabilities
 241
 241
Total Current Liabilities1,301
 (46) 1,255
      
Long-term debt9,751
 
 9,751
Other liabilities and deferred credits1,004
 (354) 650
Total Liabilities12,056
 (400) 11,656
      
Shareholders’ Deficit     
Accumulated deficit(7,592) 251
 (7,341)
Accumulated other comprehensive loss(334) (20) (354)
Total Shareholders’ Deficit(7,926) 231
 (7,695)
Total Liabilities and Shareholders’ Deficit$4,130
 $(169) $3,961


The significant impacts resulting from the adoption of Topic 606 on our Consolidated Balance Sheet as of December 31, 2018, are consistent with those recorded as of January 1, 2018 as described previously.

Under Legacy Revenue GAAP, Cash, Cash Equivalents, Restricted Cash, and Restricted Cash Equivalents pertaining to advertising cooperatives that we were required to consolidate were classified within Advertising cooperative assets, restricted. Upon adoption of Topic 606, these amounts are reflected on our Consolidated Balance Sheet and changes in these balances are reported within our Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows.



Items Impacting Other Pension (Income) Expense

During the fourthfirst quarter of 2016, the Company allowed certain former employees with deferred vested balances in the YUM Retirement Plan ("the Plan") an opportunity to voluntarily elect an early payout of their pension benefits. As2017, as a result of settlement payments madethe completion of approximately $205 million related to this program, all of which were funded from existing Plan assets,a pension data review and reconciliation, we recorded a pre-tax settlementnon-cash, out-of-year charge of $22 million to G&A expenses in 2016Other pension (income) expense to adjust our historical U.S. pension liability related to our deferred vested participants. Our CODM did not consider the impact of $25 million thatthis charge when assessing segment performance given the number of years over which it accumulated. As such, this cost was not allocated to any of our segment operating results due to the size and non-recurring nature of the program.for performance reporting purposes. See Note 1514 for further discussion of our pension plans.

Store Closure and Impairment Activity
Note 5 – Revenue Recognition

Store closure (income) costsDisaggregation of Total Revenues

The following table disaggregates revenue by Concept, for our two most significant markets based on Operating Profit and Store impairment chargesfor all other markets. We believe this disaggregation best reflects the extent to which the nature, amount, timing and uncertainty of our revenues and cash flows are impacted by reportable segment are presented below.
  2016
  KFC Pizza Hut Taco Bell Worldwide
Store closure (income) costs(a)
 $3
 $(4) $
 $(1)
Store impairment charges 8
 4
 3
 15
Closure and impairment (income) expenses $11
 $
 $3
 $14
economic factors.

  2015
  KFC Pizza Hut Taco Bell Worldwide
Store closure (income) costs(a)
 $1
 $(2) $(1) $(2)
Store impairment charges 8
 5
 4
 17
Closure and impairment (income) expenses $9
 $3
 $3
 $15
 2019
  KFC Division Pizza Hut Division Taco Bell Division Total
U.S.        
Company sales $74
 $21
 $919
 $1,014
Franchise revenues 175
 282
 602
 1,059
Property revenues 20
 6
 44
 70
Franchise contributions for advertising and other services 10
 318
 483
 811
         
China        
Franchise revenues 214
 60
 
 274
         
Other        
Company sales 497
 33
 2
 532
Franchise revenues 912
 246
 27
 1,185
Property revenues 69
 3
 
 72
Franchise contributions for advertising and other services 520
 58
 2
 580
  $2,491
 $1,027
 $2,079
 $5,597



 2018
  KFC Division Pizza Hut Division Taco Bell Division Total
U.S.        
Company sales $72
 $37
 $1,034
 $1,143
Franchise revenues 171
 284
 539
 994
Property revenues 23
 4
 27
 54
Franchise contributions for advertising and other services 9
 269
 428
 706
         
China        
Franchise revenues 201
 59
 
 260
         
Other        
Company sales 822
 32
 3
 857
Franchise revenues 825
 248
 24
 1,097
Property revenues 74
 3
 
 77
Franchise contributions for advertising and other services 447
 52
 1
 500
  $2,644
 $988
 $2,056
 $5,688


Property revenues for the year ended December 31, 2017 were $86 million.

Contract Liabilities

Our contract liabilities are comprised of unamortized upfront fees received from franchisees. A summary of significant changes to the contract liability balance during 2019 and 2018 is presented below.

  2014
  KFC Pizza Hut Taco Bell Worldwide
Store closure (income) costs(a)
 $2
 $1
 $
 $3
Store impairment charges 8
 4
 3
 15
Closure and impairment (income) expenses $10
 $5
 $3
 $18
  Deferred Franchise Fees
Balance at January 1, 2018 $392
Revenue recognized that was included in unamortized upfront fees received from franchisees at the beginning of the period (66)
Increase for upfront fees associated with contracts that became effective during the period, net of amounts recognized as revenue during the period 102
Other(a)
 (14)
Balance at December 31, 2018 $414
Revenue recognized that was included in unamortized upfront fees received from franchisees at the beginning of the period (70)
Increase for upfront fees associated with contracts that became effective during the period, net of amounts recognized as revenue during the period 93
Other(a)
 4
Balance at December 31, 2019 $441

(a)Store closure (income) costs includeIncludes impact of foreign currency translation as well as, in 2018, the net gain orrecognition of deferred franchise fees into Refranchising (gain) loss on salesupon the modification of real estate on which we formerly operated a Company-owned restaurant that was closed, lease reserves establishedexisting franchise agreements when we cease using a property under an operating lease and subsequent adjustments to those reserves and other facility-related expenses from previously closed stores. Remaining lease obligations for closed stores were not material at December 31, 2016 or December 26, 2015.entering into master franchise agreements.

We expect to recognize contract liabilities as revenue over the remaining term of the associated franchise agreement as follows:



Less than 1 year$65
 
1 - 2 years60
 
2 - 3 years56
 
3 - 4 years51
 
4 - 5 years46
 
Thereafter163
 
Total$441
 

We have applied the optional exemption, as provided for under Topic 606, which allows us to not disclose the transaction price allocated to unsatisfied performance obligations when the transaction price is a sales-based royalty.


66



Note 6 – Supplemental Cash Flow Data
 
 2016 2015 2014 2019 2018 2017
Cash Paid For:            
Interest $297
 $145
 $141
 $497
 $455
 $442
Income taxes(a)
 317
 390
 495
 283
 279
 346
Significant Non-Cash Investing and Financing Activities:            
Capital lease obligations incurred $9
 $25
 $17
Finance lease obligations incurred $14
 $4
 $8
Finance lease and other debt obligations transferred through refranchising (1) (24) (35)
Reconciliation of Cash and cash equivalents to Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows:            
Cash and cash equivalents as presented in Consolidated Balance Sheets $704
 $313
 $341
 $605
 $292
 $1,522
Restricted cash included in Prepaid expenses and other current assets(b)
 55
 
 
Restricted cash included in Other assets(c)
 53
 21
 16
Cash, Cash Equivalents and Restricted Cash as presented in Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows $812
 $334
 $357
Restricted cash included in Prepaid expenses and other current assets(a)
 138
 151
 60
Restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents included in Other assets(b)
 25
 31
 17
Cash, Cash Equivalents and Restricted Cash as presented in Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows(c)
 $768
 $474
 $1,599


(a)2014 includes $200 million ofRestricted cash paidwithin Prepaid expenses and other current assets reflects Taco Bell Securitization interest reserves (See Note 10) and the cash related to advertising cooperatives that we consolidate that can only be used to settle obligations of the resolution of a valuation issue with the Internal Revenue Service ("IRS") related to years 2004 through 2008. See Note 18.respective cooperatives.

(b)Restricted cash within Prepaid expenses and other current assets primarily relatesPrimarily trust accounts related to the Taco Bell Securitization. See Note 11.our self-insurance program.

(c)PrimarilyUpon adoption of Topic 606 we reclassified cash balances requiredof $11 million and restricted cash of $58 million, respectively, from Advertising cooperative assets, restricted to meet statutory minimum net worth requirementsCash and cash equivalents and Prepaid expenses and other current assets. These amounts are included in the Beginning of Year balance of Cash, Cash Equivalents, Restricted Cash and Restricted Cash equivalents in our Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows for legal entities which enter into U.S. franchise agreements and trust accounts related to our self-insurance programs.the year ended December 31, 2018.


Note 7 – Franchise and License Fees and Income

  2016 2015 2014
Initial fees, including renewal fees $81
 $78
 $76
Initial franchise fees included in Refranchising (gain) loss (9) (6) (2)
  72
 72
 74
Continuing fees and rental income 2,094
 2,012
 2,010
Franchise and license fees and income $2,166

$2,084

$2,084



Note 87 – Other (Income) Expense

 2016 2015 2014 2019 2018 2017
Foreign exchange net (gain) loss and other(a) $(2) $17
 $11
 $(1) $1
 $7
Loss associated with corporate aircraft(a)
 9
 
 
Closure and impairment expense 5
 6
 3
Other (income) expense $7

$17

$11
 $4

$7

$10


(a)During 2016, we made the decision to no longer operate a corporate aircraft fleet and offered our owned aircraft for sale, one2019 includes settlement of which was sold during 2016 and one that is classified as held for sale at the end of 2016 within Prepaid expenses and other current assets. The lossescontingent consideration associated with the sale and planned sale reflect the shortfallour 2013 acquisition of the expected or actual proceeds, less any selling costs, over the carrying value of the aircraft. SeeKFC Turkey and Pizza Hut Turkey businesses (See Note 5.4).


67



Note 98 Supplemental Balance Sheet Information

Prepaid Expenses and Other Current Assets 2016 2015 2019 2018
Income tax receivable $61
 $39
 $39
 $36
Restricted cash 138
 151
Assets held for sale(a)
 51
 10
 25
 24
Other prepaid expenses and current assets 126
 84
 136
 143
Prepaid expenses and other current assets $238

$133
 $338

$354



Property, Plant and Equipment 2019 2018
Land $408
 $422
Buildings and improvements 1,325
 1,349
Finance leases, primarily buildings 68
 59
Machinery, equipment and other 505
 523
Property, plant and equipment, gross 2,306
 2,353
Accumulated depreciation and amortization (1,136) (1,116)
Property, plant and equipment, net $1,170

$1,237


Depreciation and amortization expense related to PP&E was $114 million, $146 million and $215 million in 2019, 2018 and 2017, respectively.

Other Assets 2019 2018
Operating lease right-of-use assets(b)
 $642
 $
Investment in Grubhub common stock(c)
 137
 214
Franchise incentives 174
 141
Other 360
 369
Other assets $1,313
 $724

Accounts Payable and Other Current Liabilities 2019 2018
Accounts payable $173
 $202
Accrued compensation and benefits 223
 206
Accrued advertising 96
 108
Operating lease liabilities(b)
 67
 
Accrued taxes, other than income taxes 52
 48
Other current liabilities 349
 347
Accounts payable and other current liabilities $960

$911


(a)Reflects the carrying value of restaurants we have offered for sale to franchisees and excess properties that we do not intend to use for restaurant operations in the future and a corporate aircraft we expect to sell in 2017.future.

Property, Plant and Equipment 2016 2015
Land $441
 $480
Buildings and improvements 2,184
 2,232
Capital leases, primarily buildings 154
 168
Machinery and equipment 1,410
 1,515
Property, plant and equipment, gross 4,189
 4,395
Accumulated depreciation and amortization (2,029) (2,048)
Property, plant and equipment, net $2,160

$2,347

(b)Increase from 2018 primarily due to the adoption of Topic 842 beginning with the year ended December 31, 2019. See Notes 2 and 4 for further discussion.

Depreciation and amortization expense related to property, plant and equipment was $294 million, $304 million and $310 million in 2016, 2015 and 2014, respectively.
(c)Refer to Note 4 for additional discussion regarding our investment in Grubhub.

Accounts Payable and Other Current Liabilities 2016 2015
Accounts payable $200
 $181
Accrued capital expenditures 44
 46
Accrued compensation and benefits 380
 281
Dividends payable 106
 197
Accrued taxes, other than income taxes 64
 74
Other current liabilities 338
 295
Accounts payable and other current liabilities $1,132

$1,074




68



Note 109 – Goodwill and Intangible Assets

The changes in the carrying amount of goodwill are as follows:

  KFC Pizza Hut Taco Bell Worldwide
Balance as of December 27, 2014        
Goodwill, gross $314
 $200
 $114
 $628
Accumulated impairment losses 
 (17) 
 (17)
Goodwill, net 314
 183
 114
 611
Acquisitions 1
 
 1
 2
Disposals and other, net(a)
 (33) (7) (2) (42)
Balance as of December 26, 2015        
Goodwill, gross 282
 193
 113
 588
Accumulated impairment losses 
 (17) 
 (17)
Goodwill, net 282
 176
 113
 571
Disposals and other, net(a)
 (12) (16) (2) (30)
Balance as of December 31, 2016        
Goodwill, gross 270
 177
 111
 558
Accumulated impairment losses 
 (17) 
 (17)
Goodwill, net $270
 $160
 $111
 $541
  KFC Pizza Hut Taco Bell Worldwide
Goodwill, net as of December 31, 2017(a)
 $247
 $162
 $103
 $512
Disposal and other, net(b)
 (17) (5) (4) (26)
QuikOrder acquisition(c)
 
 39
 
 39
Goodwill, net as of December 31, 2018(a)
 $230
 $196
 $99
 $525
Disposal and other, net(b)
 3
 3
 (1) 5
Goodwill, net as of December 31, 2019(a)
 $233
 $199
 $98
 $530


(a)Goodwill, net includes $17 million of accumulated impairment losses for each year presented related to our Pizza Hut segment.

(b)Disposals and other, net includes the impact of foreign currency translation on existing balances and goodwill write-offs associated with refranchising.

(c)In December 2018, we completed the acquisition of QuikOrder, LLC, an online ordering software and service provider for the restaurant industry (“QuikOrder”), who was a provider of services to Company and franchise restaurants of our Pizza Hut U.S. business for nearly two decades. The purchase price allocated for accounting purposes of $77 million consisted of cash, net of cash acquired, in the amount of $66 million, settlement of a prepaid asset of $6 million related to our preexisting contractual relationship with QuikOrder and contingent consideration of $5 million. The contingent consideration was paid in the year ended December 31, 2019. The acquisition was part of our strategy to deliver an easy and personalized online ordering experience and accelerate digital innovation. Subsequent to the acquisition, fees paid by franchisees for use of the QuikOrder software are being presented within Franchise contributions for advertising and other services. Associated costs we incur are being presented within Franchise advertising and other services expense and G&A.

The primary assets recorded as a result of the purchase price allocation were goodwill of $39 million and amortizable intangible assets (primarily software) of $33 million. The goodwill recorded resulted from increased synergies expected to be achieved through leveraging our scale and resources to enhance the services previously offered by QuikOrder. The goodwill amortization is deductible for tax purposes and has been allocated to the Pizza Hut U.S. reporting unit.

The pro forma impact on our results of operations if the acquisition had been completed as of the beginning of 2017 would not have been significant. The direct transaction costs associated with the acquisition were also not material and were expensed as incurred.



Intangible assets, net for the years ended 20162019 and 20152018 are as follows:
 
 2016 2015 2019 2018
 Gross Carrying Amount Accumulated Amortization Gross Carrying Amount Accumulated Amortization Gross Carrying Amount Accumulated Amortization Gross Carrying Amount Accumulated Amortization
Definite-lived intangible assets                
Capitalized software costs $306
 $(130) $319
 $(156)
Reacquired franchise rights $84
 $(49) $92
 $(49) 38
 (32) 37
 (30)
Franchise contract rights 99
 (73) 99
 (70) 100
 (83) 99
 (79)
Lease tenancy rights 56
 (9) 55
 (9) 5
 (1) 11
 (1)
Other 36
 (24) 37
 (22) 38
 (28) 38
 (27)
 $275
 $(155) $283
 $(150) $487
 $(274) $504
 $(293)
                
Indefinite-lived intangible assets                
KFC trademark $31
   $31
   $31
   $31
  
                


Amortization expense for all definite-lived intangible assets was $12 million in 2016, $13 million in 2015 and $13$52 million in 2014.2019, $37 million in 2018 and $33 million in 2017.  Amortization expense for definite-lived intangible assets is expected to approximate $10 million in 2017, $9 million in 2018, $7$53 million in 2019, $72020, $42 million in 20202021, $25 million in 2022, $19 million in 2023 and $6$14 million in 2021.2024.




Note 1110 – Short-term Borrowings and Long-term Debt

 2016 2015 2019 2018
Short-term Borrowings        
Current maturities of long-term debt $65
 $312
 $437
 $331
Unsecured Short-Term Loan Credit Facility (the "Bridge Facility") 
 600
Other 9
 9
 4
 
 $74
 $921
 441
 331
Less current portion of debt issuance costs and discounts (8) 
 (10) (10)
Short-term borrowings $66
 $921
 $431
 $321
        
Long-term Debt        
Securitization Notes $2,294
 $
 $2,898
 $2,928
Subsidiary Senior Unsecured Notes 2,100
 
 2,850
 2,850
Term Loan A Facility 500
 
 463
 488
Term Loan B Facility 1,990
 
 1,935
 1,955
YUM Senior Unsecured Notes 2,200
 2,500
 2,425
 1,875
Senior Unsecured Revolving Credit Facility 
 701
Capital lease obligations (See Note 12) 121
 134
Finance lease obligations (See Note 11) 77
 71
 9,205
 3,335
 $10,648
 $10,167
Less debt issuance costs and discounts (79) (16) (80) (85)
Less current maturities of long-term debt (65) (312) (437) (331)
Long-term debt $9,061

$3,007
 $10,131

$9,751


During the year ended December 31, 2016, a subsidiary of Taco Bell issued $2.3 billion in Securitization Notes. Additionally, in 2016 a group of our subsidiaries issued $2.1 billion in Senior Unsecured Notes and entered into a Credit Agreement providing for senior, secured credit facilities consisting of a $500 million Term Loan A Facility, a $2.0 billion Term Loan B Facility and a $1.0 billion revolving credit facility with $995 million in borrowings available as of December 31, 2016 (net of $5 million in outstanding letters of credit) During 2016, YUM repaid $300 million in YUM Senior Unsecured Notes and repaid and terminated the Bridge


Facility, which had $600 million of outstanding borrowings as of December 26, 2015. We also repaid and terminated the Senior Unsecured Revolving Credit Facility, which had $701 million of outstanding borrowings as of December 26, 2015.

Securitization Notes

On May 11, 2016 TacoTaco Bell Funding, LLC (the “Issuer”), a newly formed, special purpose limited liability company and a direct, wholly-owned subsidiary of Taco Bell Corp. ("TBC"(“TBC”) completedthrough a series of securitization transaction andtransactions has issued $800 million of its Series 2016-1 3.832% Fixed Rate Senior Secured Notes, Class A-2-I (the “Class A-2-I Notes”), $500 million of its Series 2016-1 4.377% Fixed Rate Senior Secured Notes, Class A-2-II (the “Class A-2-II Notes”) and $1.0 billion of its Series 2016-1 4.970% Fixed Rate Senior Secured Notes, Class A-2-III (the “Class A-2-III Notes” and, together with the Class A-2-I Notes and the Class A-2-II Notes, the “Class A-2 Notes”).  In connection with the issuance of the Class A-2 Notes, the Issuer also entered into a revolving financing facility of Series 2016-1 Senior Notes, Class A-1 (the “Variable Funding Notes”), which allows for the borrowing of up to $100 million and the issuance of up to $50 million in letters of credit.  The Class A-2 Notes and the Variable Funding Notes arefixed rate senior secured notes collectively referred to collectively as the “Securitization Notes”. The Class A-2following table summarizes Securitization Notes were issued under a Base Indenture, dated as of May 11, 2016 (the “Base Indenture”), and the related Series 2016-1 Supplement thereto, dated as of May 11, 2016 (the “Series 2016-1 Supplement”).  The Base Indenture and the Series 2016-1 Supplement (collectively, the “Indenture”) allow the Issuer to issue additional series of notes.outstanding at December 31, 2019:
      Interest Rate
Issuance Date 
Anticipated Repayment Date(a)
 
Outstanding Principal
(in millions)
 Stated 
Effective(b)
May 2016 May 2023 $488
 4.377% 4.59%
May 2016 May 2026 $975
 4.970% 5.14%
November 2018 November 2023 $816
 4.318% 4.53%
November 2018 November 2028 $619
 4.940% 5.06%

(a)The legal final maturity dates of the Securitization Notes issued in 2016 and 2018 are May 2046 and November 2048, respectively. If the Issuer has not repaid or refinanced a series of Securitization Notes prior to its respective Anticipated Repayment Dates, rapid amortization of principal on all Securitization Notes will occur and additional interest will accrue on the Securitization Notes.

(b)Includes the effects of the amortization of any discount and debt issuance costs.

The Securitization Notes were issued in a transactiontransactions pursuant to which certain of TBC’s domestic assets, consisting principally of franchise-related agreements and domestic intellectual property, were contributed to the Issuer and the Issuer’s special purpose, wholly-owned subsidiaries (the “Guarantors”, and collectively with the Issuer, the "Securitization Entities") to secure the Securitization Notes. The Securitization Notes are secured by substantially all of the assets of the Securitization Entities, and include a lien on all existing and future U.S. Taco Bell franchise and license agreements and the royalties payable thereunder, existing and future U.S. Taco Bell intellectual property, certain transaction accounts and a pledge of the equity interests in asset-owningasset owning Securitization Entities. The remaining U.S. Taco Bell assets that were excluded from the transfers to the Securitization Entities continue to be held by Taco Bell of America, LLC a limited liability company ("TBA") and TBC. The Securitization Notes are not guaranteed by the remaining U.S. Taco Bell assets, the Company, or any other subsidiary of the Company.



Payments of interest and principal on the Securitization Notes are made from the royaltycontinuing fees paid pursuant to the franchise and license agreements with all U.S. Taco Bell restaurants, including both company and franchise operated restaurants. Interest on and principal payments of the Class A-2Securitization Notes are due on a quarterly basis. In general, no amortization of principal of the Class A-2Securitization Notes is required prior to their anticipated repayment dates unless as of any quarterly measurement date the consolidated leverage ratio (the ratio of total debt to Net Cash Flow (as defined in the Indenture)related indenture)) for the preceding four fiscal quarters of either the Company and its subsidiaries or the Issuer and its subsidiaries exceeds 5.0:1, in which case amortization payments of 1% per year of the outstanding principal as of the closing of the Securitization Notes isare required. As of the most recent quarterly measurement date the consolidated leverage ratio exceeded 5.0:1 and, as a result, amortization payments are required. The legal final maturity date of the Notes is in May 2046, but the anticipated repayment dates of the Class A-2-I Notes, the Class A-2-II Notes and the Class A-2-III Notes will be 4, 7 and 10 years, respectively (the “Anticipated Repayment Dates”) from the date of issuance.  If the Issuer has not repaid or refinanced a series of Class A-2 Notes prior to its respective Anticipated Repayment Dates, rapid amortization of principal on all Securitization Notes will occur and additional interest will accrue on the Class A-2 Notes, as stated in the Indenture.

Interest on the Variable Funding Notes will be based on (i) the prime rate, (ii) the overnight federal funds rates, (iii) the London interbank offered rate (“LIBOR”) for U.S. Dollars or (iv) with respect to advances made by conduit investors, the weighted average cost of, or related to, the issuance of commercial paper allocated to fund or maintain such advances, plus any applicable margin, in each case as more fully set forth in the Variable Funding Note Purchase Agreement. It is anticipated that outstanding principal of and interest on the Variable Funding Notes, if any, will be repaid in full on or prior to May 2021, subject to two additional one-year extensions at the option of the Issuer and further extensions as agreed between the Issuer and the Administrative Agent.  Following the anticipated repayment date and any extensions thereof, additional interest will accrue on the Variable Funding Notes equal to 5.00% per year.  As of December 31, 2016, $15 million of letters of credit were outstanding against the Variable Funding Notes, which relate primarily to interest reserves required under the Indenture. The Variable Funding Notes were undrawn at December  31, 2016.

The Company paid debt issuance costs of $31 million in connection with the issuance of the Securitization Notes. The debt issuance costs are being amortized to Interest expense, net through the Anticipated Repayment Dates of the Securitization Notes utilizing the effective interest rate method. We classify these deferred costs on our Consolidated Balance Sheet as a reduction in the related debt when borrowings are outstanding or within Other assets if borrowings are not outstanding. As of December 31, 2016, the effective interest rates, including the amortization of debt issuance costs, were 4.18%, 4.59%, and 5.14% for the Class A-2-I Notes, Class A-2-II Notes and Class A-2-III Notes, respectively.



The Securitization Notes are subject to a series of covenants and restrictions customary for transactions of this type, including (i) that the Issuer maintains specified reserve accounts to be available to make required interest payments in respect of the Securitization Notes, (ii) provisions relating to optional and mandatory prepayments and the related payment of specified amounts, including specified make-whole payments in the case of the Class A-2Securitization Notes under certain circumstances, (iii) certain indemnification payments relating to taxes, enforcement costs and other customary items and (iv) covenants relating to recordkeeping, access to information and similar matters. The Securitization Notes are also subject to rapid amortization events provided for in the Indenture,indenture, including events tied to failure to maintain a stated debt service coverage ratio (as defined in the Indenture)related indenture) of at least 1.1:1, gross domestic sales for branded restaurants being below certain levels on certain measurement dates, a manager termination event, an event of default and the failure to repay or refinance the Class A-2Securitization Notes on the Anticipated Repayment Date (subject to limited cure rights). The Securitization Notes are also subject to certain customary events of default, including events relating to non-payment of required interest or principal due on the Securitization Notes, failure to comply with covenants within certain time frames, certain bankruptcy events, breaches of specified representations and warranties, failure of security interests to be effective, certain judgments and failure of the Securitization Entities to maintain a stated debt service coverage ratio. As of December 31, 2016,2019, we were in compliance with all of our debt covenant requirements and were not subject to any rapid amortization events.

In accordance with the Indenture,indenture, certain cash accounts have been established with the Indentureindenture trustee for the benefit of the note holders, and are restricted in their use. The Indentureindenture requires a certain amount of securitization cash flow collections to be allocated on a weekly basis and maintained in a cash reserve account. As of December 31, 2016,2019, the Company had restricted cash of $55$81 million primarily related to required interest reserves. Such restricted cash isreserves included in Prepaid expenses and other current assets on the Consolidated Balance Sheet as of December 31, 2016.Sheets. Once the required obligations are satisfied, there are no further restrictions, including payment of dividends, on the cash flows of the Securitization Entities.

Additional cash reserves are required if any of the rapid amortization events occur, as noted above, or in the event that as of any quarterly measurement date the Securitization Entities fail to maintain a debt service coverage ratio (or the ratio of Net Cash Flow to all debt service payments for the preceding four fiscal quarters) of at least 1.75:1. The amount of weekly securitization cash flow collections that exceed the required weekly allocations is generally remitted to the Company. During the most recent quarter ended December 31, 2016,2019, the Securitization Entities maintained a debt service coverage ratio significantly in excess of the 1.75:1 requirement.

CreditTerm Loan Facilities, Revolving Facility and Subsidiary Senior Unsecured Notes

On June 16, 2016, KFC Holding Co., Pizza Hut Holdings, LLC, a limited liability company, and TBA, each of which is a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company, as co-borrowers (the "Borrowers"), have entered into a credit agreement providing for senior secured credit facilities consisting of a $500 million Term Loan A facility (the “Term Loan A Facility"), a $2.0 billion Term Loan B facility (the “Term Loan B Facility”) and a $1.0 billion revolving facility (the “Revolving Facility”Revolving Facility"), each of. The senior secured credit facilities, which may be increased subject to certain conditions. Theinclude a Term Loan A Facility theand a Term Loan B Facility, and the Revolving Facility are collectively referred to as the "Credit Agreement". ThroughAdditionally, the Borrowers through a series of transactions have issued the Subsidiary Senior Unsecured Notes due 2024, 2026 and 2027 (collectively referred to as the “Subsidiary Senior Unsecured Notes”). The following table summarizes borrowings outstanding under the Credit Agreement as well as our Subsidiary Senior Unsecured Notes as of December 31, 2016, there have been2019. There are no outstanding borrowings under the Revolving Facility.Facility and $1.3 million of letters of credit outstanding as of December 31, 2019.



        Interest Rate
  Issuance Date Maturity Date 
Outstanding Principal
(in millions)
 Stated 
Effective(b)
Term Loan A Facility June 2016 June 2022 $463
 (a)
 3.46%
Term Loan B Facility June 2016 April 2025 $1,935
 (a)
 3.65%
Senior Note Due 2024 June 2016 June 2024 $1,050
 5.00% 5.16%
Senior Note Due 2026 June 2016 June 2026 $1,050
 5.25% 5.39%
Senior Note Due 2027 June 2017 June 2027 $750
 4.75% 4.90%

(a)The interest rates applicable to the Term Loan A Facility as well as the Revolving Facility range from 1.25% to 1.75% plus LIBOR or from 0.25% to 0.75% plus the Base Rate (as defined in the Credit Agreement), at the Borrowers’ election, based upon the total leverage ratio of the Borrowers and the Specified Guarantors (as defined in the Credit Agreement). As of December 31, 2019 the interest rate spreads on the LIBOR and Base Rate applicable to our Term Loan A Facility were 1.50% and 0.50%, respectively.

The interest rates applicable to the Term Loan B Facility are 1.75% plus LIBOR or 0.75% plus the Base Rate, at the Borrowers’ election.

(b)Includes the effects of the amortization of any discount and debt issuance costs as well as the impact of the interest rate swaps on the Term Loan B Facility (See Note 12). The effective rates related to our Term Loan A and B Facilities are based on current LIBOR-based interest rates at December 31, 2019.

The Term Loan A Facility is subject to quarterly amortization payments beginning one full fiscal quarter after the first anniversary of the closing date,currently in an amount equal to 1.25% of the initial principal amount of the facility, in each of the second and third years of the facility; infacility. These amortization payments will increase to an amount equal to 1.875% of the initial principal amount of the facility inon the fourth yearanniversary of the facility;closing date and into an amount equal to 3.75% of the initial principal amount of the facility inon the fifth yearanniversary of the facility,closing date, with the balance payable at maturity on the fifth anniversary of the closing date. June 7, 2022.

The Term Loan B Facility is subject to quarterly amortization payments in an amount equal to 0.25% of the initial principal amount of the facility, with the balance payable at maturity on the seventh anniversary of the closing date.

The interest rate for the Term Loan A Facility and for borrowings under the Revolving Facility ranges from 2.00% to 2.50% plus LIBOR or from 1.00% to 1.50% plus the Base Rate (as defined in the Credit Agreement), at the Borrowers’ election, based upon the total net leverage ratio of the Borrowers and the Specified Guarantors. The Specified Guarantors are the following subisidiaries of the Company: YUM Restaurant Services Group, LLC, Restaurant Concepts LLC and TBC and their subsidiaries, excluding Taco Bell Funding LLC, and its special purpose, wholly-owned subsidiaries (see above). The interest rate for the Term Loan B Facility is either LIBOR plus 2.75% or the Base Rate plus 1.75%, at the Borrowers’ election. Interest on any outstanding borrowings under the Credit Agreement is payable at least quarterly. The Term Loan A Facility and the Revolving Facility mature in June 2021 and the Term Loan B Facility matures in June 2023.


April 3, 2025.

The Credit Agreement is unconditionally guaranteed by the Company and certain of the Borrowers’ principal domestic subsidiaries and excludes Taco Bell Funding LLC and its special purpose, wholly-owned subsidiaries (see above). The Credit Agreement is also secured by first priority liens on substantially all assets of the Borrowers and each subsidiary guarantor, excluding the stock of certain subsidiaries and certain real property, and subject to other customary exceptions.

The Credit Agreement is subject to certain mandatory prepayments, including an amount equal to 50% of excess cash flow (as defined in the Credit Agreement) on an annual basis and the proceeds of certain asset sales, casualty events and issuances of indebtedness, subject to customary exceptions and reinvestment rights.

The Credit Agreement includes two financial maintenance covenants which require the Borrowers to maintain a total leverage ratio (defined as the ratio of Consolidated Total Debt to Consolidated EBITDA (as these terms are defined in the Credit Agreement)) of 5.0:1 or less and a fixed charge coverage ratio (defined as the ratio of EBITDA minus capital expenditures to fixed charges (inclusive of rental expense and scheduled amortization)) of at least 1.5:1, each as of the last day of each fiscal quarter. The Credit Agreement includes other affirmative and negative covenants and events of default that are customary for facilities of this type. The Credit Agreement contains, among other things, limitations on certain additional indebtedness and liens, and certain other transactions specified in the agreement. We were in compliance with all debt covenants as of December 31, 2016.2019.

Additionally, on June 16, 2016, the Borrowers issued $1.05 billion aggregate principal amount of 5.00% Senior Unsecured Notes due 2024 and $1.05 billion aggregate principal amount of 5.25% Senior Unsecured Notes due 2026 (together, the “Subsidiary Senior Unsecured Notes”). Interest on each series of Subsidiary Senior Unsecured Notes is payable semi-annually in arrears on June 1 and December 1, beginning on December 1, 2016. The Subsidiary Senior Unsecured Notes are guaranteed on a senior unsecured basis by (i) the Company, (ii) the Specified Guarantors and (iii) by each of the Borrower's and the Specified Guarantors’ domestic subsidiaries that guarantees the Borrower's obligations under the Credit Agreement, except for any of the Company’s foreign subsidiaries. The indenture governing the Subsidiary Senior Unsecured Notes contains covenants and events of default that are customary for debt securities of this type. We were in compliance with all debt covenants as of December 31, 2016.2019.

During 2016, the Company paid debt issuance costs of $56 million in connection with the issuance of the Credit Agreement and the Subsidiary Senior Unsecured Notes. The debt issuance costs are being amortized to Interest expense, net through the contractual maturity of the agreements utilizing the effective interest rate method. We classify these deferred costs on our Consolidated Balance Sheet as a reduction in the related debt when borrowings are outstanding or within Other assets if borrowings are not outstanding. As of December 31, 2016, the effective interest rates, including the amortization of debt issuance costs and the impact of the interest rate swaps on Term Loan B Facility (See Note 13), were 5.16%, 5.39%, 3.01%, and 3.91% for the Subsidiary Senior Unsecured Notes due 2024, the Subsidiary Senior Unsecured Notes due 2026, the Term Loan A Facility, and the Term Loan B Facility, respectively.

YUM Senior Unsecured Notes

The majority of our remaining long-term debt primarily comprises YUM Senior Unsecured Notes. The following table summarizes all YUM Senior Unsecured Notes issued that remain outstanding at December 31, 2019:

      Interest Rate
Issuance Date Maturity Date Principal Amount (in millions) Stated 
Effective(a)
October 2007 November 2037 $325
 6.88% 7.45%
August 2010 November 2020 $350
 3.88% 4.01%
August 2011 November 2021 $350
 3.75% 3.88%
October 2013 November 2023 $325
 3.88% 4.01%
October 2013 November 2043 $275
 5.35% 5.42%
September 2019 January 2030 $800
 4.75% 4.90%


(a)Includes the effects of the amortization of any (1) premium or discount; (2) debt issuance costs; and (3) gain or loss upon settlement of related treasury locks and forward starting interest rate swaps utilized to hedge the interest rate risk prior to debt issuance.

As included in the table above, on September 11, 2019, Yum! Brands, Inc. issued $800 million aggregate principal amount of 4.75% YUM Senior Unsecured Notes due January 15, 2030 (the “2030 Notes”). The net proceeds from the issuance were used to repay in full $250 million aggregate principal amount of YUM Senior Unsecured Notes that matured in September 2019, to repay the then outstanding borrowings under our $1 billion revolving facility and for general corporate purposes. Interest on the 2030 Notes is payable semiannually in arrears on January 15 and July 15 of each year. The Company incurred debt issuance costs of $10 million in connection with varying maturity dates from 2018 through 2043 and stated interest rates ranging from 3.75% to 6.88%.  the issuance of the 2030 Notes. These issuance costs are recorded as a reduction in Long-term debt on our Consolidated Balance Sheet.

The YUM Senior Unsecured Notes represent senior, unsecured obligations and rank equally in right of payment with all of our existing and future unsecured unsubordinated indebtedness. Our YUM Senior Unsecured Notes contain cross-default provisions whereby the acceleration of the maturity of any of our indebtedness in a principal amount in excess of $50 million will constitute a default under the YUM Senior Unsecured Notes unless such indebtedness is discharged, or the acceleration of the maturity of that indebtedness is annulled, within 30 days after notice.

The annual maturities of all Short-term borrowings and Long-term debt as of December 31, 2019, excluding finance lease obligations of $77 million are as follows:
Year ended: 
2020$434
2021455
2022424
20231,626
20241,086
Thereafter6,550
Total$10,575

Interest expense on Short-term borrowings and Long-term debt was $519 million, $496 million and $473 million in 2019, 2018 and 2017, respectively.

During


Note 11 – Lease Accounting

Components of Lease Expense
    2019
Operating lease cost   $115
Finance lease cost    
Amortization of right-of-use assets   3
Interest on lease liabilities   3
Total finance lease cost   6
Sublease income   (69)

Rental expense related to operating leases was $151 million and $214 million for the second quarter of 2016, we repaid $300 million of YUM Senior Unsecured Notes upon their maturity.years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively.

Supplemental Cash Flow Information
  2019
Cash paid for amounts included in the measurement of lease liabilities  
Operating cash flows from operating leases $104
Operating cash flows from finance leases 3
Financing cash flows from finance leases 4
Right-of-use assets obtained in exchange for lease obligations  
Operating leases 79
Finance leases 14



The following table summarizes all YUM Senior Unsecured Notes issued that remain outstanding at December 31, 2016:Supplemental Balance Sheet Information

      Interest Rate
Issuance Date(a)
 Maturity Date Principal Amount (in millions) Stated 
Effective(b)
October 2007 March 2018 $325
 6.25% 6.36%
October 2007 November 2037 $325
 6.88% 7.45%
August 2009 September 2019 $250
 5.30% 5.59%
August 2010 November 2020 $350
 3.88% 4.01%
August 2011 November 2021 $350
 3.75% 3.88%
October 2013 November 2023 $325
 3.88% 4.01%
October 2013 November 2043 $275
 5.35% 5.42%
  2019 Consolidated Balance Sheet
Assets    
Operating lease right-of-use assets $642
 Other assets
Finance lease right-of-use assets 42
 Property, plant and equipment, net
Total right-of-use assets(a)
 $684
  
     
Liabilities    
Current    
Operating $67
 Accounts payable and other current liabilities
Finance 7
 Short-term borrowings
Non-current    
Operating 640
 Other liabilities and deferred credits
Finance 70
 Long-term debt
Total lease liabilities(a)
 $784
  
     
Weighted-average Remaining Lease Term (in years)    
Operating leases 12.3
  
Finance leases 12.7
  
     
Weighted-average Discount Rate    
Operating leases 5.6%  
Finance leases 6.6%  

(a)
Interest payments commenced approximately six months after issuance dateU.S. operating lease right-of-use assets and are payable semi-annually thereafter.
liabilities totaled $283 million and $337 million, respectively, as of December 31, 2019. These amounts primarily related to Taco Bell U.S. including leases related to Company-operated restaurants, leases related to franchise-operated restaurants we sublease and the Taco Bell restaurant support center.

(b)Includes the effects of the amortization of any (1) premium or discount; (2) debt issuance costs; and (3) gain or loss upon settlement of related treasury locks and forward starting interest rate swaps utilized to hedge the interest rate risk prior to debt issuance.

The annual maturities of short-term borrowings and long-term debt as of December 31, 2016, excluding capital lease obligations of $121 million are as follows:
Year ended: 
2017$64
2018393
2019324
20201,215
2021760
Thereafter6,337
Total$9,093


Interest expense on short-term borrowings and long-term debt was $333 million, $153 million and $151 million in 2016, 2015 and 2014, respectively.


Note 12 – Leases

At December 31, 2016, we operated approximately 2,800 restaurants, leasing the underlying land and/or building in approximately 2,000 of those restaurants with the vast majority of our commitments expiring within 20 years from the inception of the lease.  In addition, the Company leases or subleases approximately 700 units to franchisees, principally in the U.S., United Kingdom, Germany and France.

We also lease office space for headquarters and support functions, as well as certain office and restaurant equipment.  We do not consider any of these individual leases material to our operations.  Most leases require us to pay related executory costs, which include property taxes, maintenance and insurance.



Maturity of Lease Payments and Receivables

Future minimum commitmentslease payments, including rental payments for lease renewal options we are reasonably certain to exercise, and amounts to be received as lessor or sublessor as of December 31, 2019 were as follows:
  Commitments Lease Receivables
  Finance Operating Direct Financing Operating
2020 $11
 $105
 $5
 $81
2021 11
 100
 4
 76
2022 9
 92
 4
 72
2023 9
 83
 4
 69
2024 8
 76
 3
 65
Thereafter 62
 531
 28
 601
Total lease payments/receipts 110
 987
 48
 $964
Less imputed interest/unearned income (33) (280) (18)  
Total lease liabilities/receivables $77
 $707
 $30
  

As of December 31, 2019, we have executed real estate leases that have not yet commenced with estimated future lease payments of approximately $46 million, which are not included in the tables above. These leases are expected to commence in 2020 with lease terms of up to 20 years.

Future minimum lease payments and amounts to be received as lessor or sublessor under non-cancelablethe non-cancellable term of leases are set forth below:as of December 31, 2018 as required to be disclosed under Legacy Lease GAAP were as follows:
 Commitments Lease Receivables Commitments Lease Receivables
 
 
Capital
 
 
Operating
 
Direct
 Financing
 
 
Operating
 Capital Operating Direct Financing Operating
2017 $16
 $171
 $3
 $40
2018 16
 148
 2
 36
2019 15
 128
 2
 30
 $10
 $103
 $6
 $89
2020 15
 101
 2
 23
 10
 89
 5
 79
2021 14
 85
 1
 20
 9
 78
 4
 74
2022 8
 71
 4
 69
2023 8
 61
 3
 67
Thereafter 105
 571
 5
 86
 58
 384
 30
 638
 $181
 $1,204
 $15
 $235
 $103
 $786
 $52
 $1,016


At December 31, 20162018 and December 26, 2015,2017, the present value of minimum payments under capital leases was $121$71 million and $134$105 million,, respectively. At December 31, 2016,2018, unearned income associated with direct financing lease receivables was $2 million.

The details of rental expense and income are set forth below:
  2016 2015 2014
Rental expense      
Minimum $213
 $221
 $243
Contingent 29
 34
 37
  $242
 $255
 $280
Rental income $79
 $73
 $83

$19 million.

Note 1312 - Derivative Instruments

We use derivative instruments to manage certain of our market risks related to fluctuations in interest rates and foreign currency exchange rates.

Interest Rate Swaps

We enterhave entered into interest rate swaps with the objective of reducing our exposure to interest rate risk for a portion of our variable-rate debt interest payments. On July 25, 2016, we agreed with multiple counterparties to swap the variable LIBOR-based component of the interest payments related to $1.55 billion of borrowings under our $2.0 billion Term Loan B Facility, resulting in a fixed rate of 3.92% on the swapped portion of the Term Loan B Facility. These interest rate swaps will expire in July 2021 and2021.  Further, on May 14, 2018 we entered into forward-starting interest rate swaps to fix the notional amount, maturityinterest rate on $1.5 billion of borrowings under our Term Loan B Facility from the date and variablethe July 2016 swaps expire through March 2025.  The interest rate swaps executed in May 2018 will result in a fixed rate of these swaps match those4.81% on the swapped portion of the related debt.Term Loan B Facility from July 2021 through March 2025.  These interest rate swaps are designated cash flow hedges as the changes in the


future cash flows of the swaps are expected to offset changes in expected future interest payments on the related variable-rate debt.  There were no other interest rate swaps outstanding as of December 31, 2016.2019.

The effective portion of gainsGains or losses on the interest rate swaps isare reported as a component of Accumulated other comprehensive income ("AOCI")AOCI and reclassified into Interest expense, net in our Consolidated StatementStatements of Income in the same period or periods during which the related hedged interest payments affect earnings. Gains or losses on the swaps representing hedge ineffectiveness are recognized in current earnings. As ofThrough December 31, 2016,2019, the swaps were highly effective cash flow hedges and no ineffectiveness has been recorded.hedges.

Foreign Currency Contracts

We enterhave entered into foreign currency forward and swap contracts with the objective of reducing our exposure to earnings volatility arising from foreign currency fluctuations associated with certain foreign currency denominated intercompany receivables and payables. The notional amount, maturity date, and currency of these contracts match those of the underlying intercompany receivables or payables. Our foreign currency contracts are designated cash flow hedges as the future cash flows of the contracts are expected to offset changes in intercompany receivables and payables due to foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations.



The effective portion of gainsGains or losses on the foreign currency contracts isare reported as a component of AOCI. Amounts are reclassified from AOCI each quarter to offset foreign currency transaction gains or losses recorded within Other (income) expense when the related intercompany receivables and payables affect earnings due to their functional currency remeasurements.  Gains or losses on theThrough December 31, 2019, all foreign currency contracts representing hedge ineffectiveness are recognized in current earnings. As of December 31, 2016, all foreign currency contractsrelated to intercompany receivables and payables were highly effective cash flow hedges and no ineffectiveness has been recorded.hedges.

As of December 31, 20162019 and December 26, 2015,31, 2018, foreign currency forwardcontracts outstanding related to intercompany receivables and swap contracts outstandingpayables had total notional amounts of $437$20 million and $470$459 million, respectively. During the third quarter of 2019 we terminated foreign currency contracts with notional amounts of $430 million and settled the related intercompany receivable and payable.  As a result of December 31, 2016this termination and settlement, we havereclassified $4 million of unrealized loss from AOCI to Interest expense, net in our Consolidated Statements of Income.  We received $3 million in cash from the counterparty upon termination, which represented the fair value of the contracts at the time of termination.  Our remaining foreign currency forward and swap contracts withall have durations expiring as early as January 2017 and as late asthat expire in 2020.

As a result of the use of derivative instruments,interest rate swaps and foreign currency contracts, the Company is exposed to risk that the counterparties will fail to meet their contractual obligations. To mitigate the counterparty credit risk, we only enter into contracts with carefully selected major financial institutions carefully selected based upon their credit ratings and other factors, and continually assess the creditworthiness of counterparties. At December 31, 2016,2019, all of the counterparties to our interest rate swaps and foreign currency contracts had investment grade ratings according to the three major ratings agencies. To date, all counterparties have performed in accordance with their contractual obligations.

Gains and losses on derivative instruments designated as cash flow hedges recognized in OCI and reclassifications from AOCI into Net Income:

Gains/(Losses) Recognized in OCI (Gains)/Losses Reclassified from AOCI into Net IncomeGains/(Losses) Recognized in OCI (Gains)/Losses Reclassified from AOCI into Net Income
2016 2015 2016 20152019 2018 2017 2019 2018 2017
                  
Interest rate swaps$47
 $
 $(4) $
$(71) $(3) $4
 $(17) $(19) $2
Foreign currency contracts1
 32
 (4) (41)20
 22
 (56) (8) (20) 56
Income tax benefit/(expense)(19) (4) 3
 5
16
 1
 1
 4
 5
 (3)


As of December 31, 2016,2019, the estimated net gain included in AOCI related to our cash flow hedges that will be reclassified into earnings in the next 12 months is $3$6 million, based on current LIBOR interest rates.

See Note 1413 for the fair value of our derivative assets and liabilities.

Note 1413 – Fair Value Disclosures

As of December 31, 20162019 the carrying values of cash and cash equivalents, restricted cash, short-term investments, accounts receivable, short -termshort-term borrowings and accounts payable approximated their fair values because of the short-term nature of these instruments. The fair value of notes receivable net of allowances and lease guarantees less subsequent amortization approximates their carrying value. The following table presents the carrying value and estimated fair value of the Company’s debt obligations:

12/31/2016 12/26/20152019 2018
Carrying Value Fair Value (Level 2) Carrying Value Fair Value (Level 2)Carrying Value Fair Value (Level 2) Carrying Value Fair Value (Level 2)
Debt obligations       
Securitization Notes(a)
$2,294
 $2,315
 $
 $
$2,898
 $3,040
 $2,928
 $2,967
Subsidiary Senior Unsecured Notes(b)
2,100
 2,175
 
 
2,850
 3,004
 2,850
 2,733
Term Loan A Facility(b)
500
 501
 
 
463
 464
 488
 479
Term Loan B Facility(b)
1,990
 2,016
 
 
1,935
 1,949
 1,955
 1,915
YUM Senior Unsecured Notes(b)
2,200
 2,216
 2,500
 2,393
2,425
 2,572
 1,875
 1,798
(a)We estimated the fair value of the Securitization Notes by obtaining broker quotes from two separate brokerage firms that are knowledgeable about the Company’s Securitization Notes and, at times, trade these notes. The markets in which the Securitization Notes trade are not considered active markets.



(b)We estimated the fair value of the YUM and Subsidiary Senior Unsecured Notes, Term Loan A Facility, and Term Loan B Facility using market quotes and calculations based on market rates.

Recurring Fair Value Measurements

The Company has interest rate swaps, foreign currency forwards and swaps accounted for as cash flow hedgescontracts, an investment in Grubhub common stock and other investments, all of which are required to be measured at fair value on a recurring basis (See Note 1312 for discussion regarding derivative instruments)instruments and Note 4 for discussion regarding our investment in Grubhub common stock). The following table presents fair values for those assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis and the level within the fair value hierarchy in which the measurements fall.  No transfers among the levels within the fair value hierarchy occurred during the years ended December 31, 2016 or December 26, 2015.
    Fair Value 
  Level 2016 2015 Consolidated Balance Sheet
Interest Rate Swaps - Liability 2
 $3
 $
 Accounts payable and other current liabilities
Interest Rate Swaps - Asset 2
 
 2
 Prepaid expenses and other current assets
Interest Rate Swaps - Asset 2
 47
 
 Other assets
Foreign Currency Contracts - Asset 2
 7
 
 Prepaid expenses and other current assets
Foreign Currency Contracts - Asset 2
 8
 19
 Other assets
Other Investments 1
 24
 21
 Other assets
      Fair Value
  Consolidated Balance Sheet Level 2019 2018
Assets        
Interest Rate Swaps Prepaid expenses and other current assets 2
 $6
 $21
Foreign Currency Contracts Prepaid expenses and other current assets 2
 
 5
Interest Rate Swaps Other assets 2
 3
 29
Investment in Grubhub Common Stock Other assets 1
 137
 214
Other Investments Other assets 1
 43
 27
         
Liabilities        
Interest Rate Swaps Other liabilities and deferred credits 2
 71
 23
Foreign Currency Contracts Other liabilities and deferred credits 2
 
 24

The fair value of the Company’s foreign currency forwards and swapscontracts and interest rate swaps were determined based on the present value of expected future cash flows considering the risks involved, including nonperformance risk, and using discount rates appropriate for the duration based uponon observable inputs. The fair value of the investment in Grubhub common stock was determined primarily based on closing market prices for the shares. The other investments primarily include investments in mutual funds, which are used to offset fluctuations infor a portion of our deferred compensation liabilities that employees have chosen to invest in phantom shares of a Stock Index Fund or Bond Index Fund. The other investments are classified as trading securities in Other assets in our Consolidated Balance Sheet and theirwhose fair value isvalues were determined based on the closing market prices of the respective mutual funds as of December 31, 20162019 and December 26, 2015.31, 2018.

Non-Recurring Fair Value Measurements

The following table presents expenseDuring the year ended December 31, 2019, we recognized from all non-recurring fair value measurements duringof $7 million related to refranchising related impairment.  Refranchising related impairment results from writing down the assets of restaurants or restaurant groups offered for refranchising, including certain instances where a decision has been made to refranchise restaurants that are deemed to be impaired.  The fair value measurements used in our impairment evaluation were based on actual bids received from potential buyers (Level 2).  The remaining net book value of these restaurants at December 31, 2019 is insignificant.

During the years ended December 31, 20162019 and December 26, 2015.31, 2018, we recognized non-recurring fair value measurements of $4 million and $1 million, respectively, related to restaurant-level impairment. Restaurant-level impairment charges are recorded in Other (income) expense and resulted primarily from our impairment evaluation of long-lived assets of individual restaurants that


were being operated at the time of impairment and had not been offered for refranchising. The fair value measurements used in these impairment evaluations were based on discounted cash flow estimates using unobservable inputs (Level 3). These amounts exclude fair value measurements made for assets that were subsequently disposed of prior to those respective year-endyear end dates. The remaining net book value of restaurant assets measured at fair value during the years ended December 31, 20162019 and December 26, 201531, 2018 is insignificant.

  2016 2015 
Aircraft impairment(a)
 $3
 $
 
Restaurant-level impairment(b)
 8
 10
 
Total $11
 $10
 

(a)During 2016, we made the decision to dispose of a corporate aircraft. The loss associated with this planned sale reflects the shortfall of the expected proceeds, less any selling costs, over the carrying value of the aircraft. The expected proceeds are based on actual bids received from potential buyers for similar assets (Level 2).

(b)Restaurant-level impairment charges are recorded in Closures and impairment (income) expenses and resulted primarily from our semi-annual impairment evaluation of long-lived assets of individual restaurants that were being operated at the time of impairment and had not been offered for refranchising. The fair value measurements used in these impairment evaluations were based on discounted cash flow estimates using unobservable inputs (Level 3).


77




Note 1514 – Pension, Retiree Medical and Retiree Savings Plans

U.S. Pension Plans

We sponsor qualified and supplemental (non-qualified) noncontributory defined benefit plans covering certain full-time salaried and hourly U.S. employees. The qualified plan meets the requirements of certain sections of the Internal Revenue Code and provides benefits to a broad group of employees with restrictions on discriminating in favor of highly compensated employees with regard to coverage, benefits and contributions. The supplemental plans provide additional benefits to certain employees. We fund our supplemental plans as benefits are paid.

The most significant of our U.S. plans is the YUM Retirement Plan (the “Plan”), which is a qualified plan. Our funding policy with respect to the Plan is to contribute amounts necessary to satisfy minimum pension funding requirements, including requirements of the Pension Protection Act of 2006, plus additional amounts from time-to-time as are determined to be necessary to improve the Plan’s funded status. We do not expect to make any significant contributions to the Plan in 2017.2020. Our two significant U.S. plans were previously amended such that any salaried employee hired or rehired by YUM after September 30, 2001 is not eligible to participate in those plans.

During the fourth quarter of 2016, the Company allowed certain former employees with deferred vested balances in the Plan an opportunity to voluntarily elect an early payout of their benefits. See Note 5 for details.

We do not anticipate any plan assets being returned to the Company during 20172020 for any U.S. plans.

Obligation and Funded Status at Measurement Date:

The following chart summarizes the balance sheet impact, as well as benefit obligations, assets, and funded status associated with our two significant U.S. pension plans.  The actuarial valuations for all plans reflect measurement dates coinciding with our fiscal year end.

  2019 2018
Change in benefit obligation:    
Benefit obligation at beginning of year $873
 $1,007
Service cost 6
 8
Interest cost 39
 38
Plan amendments 2
 1
Special termination benefits 
 1
Benefits paid (57) (73)
Settlement payments (1) 
Actuarial (gain) loss 153
 (109)
Benefit obligation at end of year $1,015
 $873
     

A significant component of the overall increase in the Company's benefit obligation for the year ended December 31, 2019 was due to an actuarial loss, which was primarily due to a decrease in the discount rate used to measure our benefit obligation from 4.60% at December 31, 2018 to 3.50% at December 31, 2019. A significant component of the overall decrease in the Company's benefit obligation for the year ended December 31, 2018 was due to an actuarial gain, which was primarily due to an increase in the discount rate used to measure our benefit obligation from 3.90% at December 31, 2017 to 4.60% at December 31, 2018.



  2016 2015
Change in benefit obligation    
Benefit obligation at beginning of year $1,134
 $1,301
Service cost 17
 18
Interest cost 54
 55
Plan amendments 4
 28
Curtailments (4) (2)
Special termination benefits 3
 1
Benefits paid (26) (50)
Settlement payments(a)
 (260) (16)
Actuarial (gain) loss 77
 (196)
Administrative expense (6) (5)
Benefit obligation at end of year $993
 $1,134
     
Change in plan assets    
Fair value of plan assets at beginning of year $1,004
 $991
Actual return on plan assets 87
 (10)
Employer contributions 38
 94
Settlement payments(a)
 (260) (16)
Benefits paid (26) (50)
Administrative expenses (6) (5)
Fair value of plan assets at end of year $837
 $1,004
 Funded status at end of year $(156) $(130)
Change in plan assets:    
Fair value of plan assets at beginning of year $755
 $864
Actual return on plan assets 176
 (49)
Employer contributions 12
 13
Benefits paid (57) (73)
Fair value of plan assets at end of year $886
 $755
 Funded status at end of year $(129) $(118)


(a)For discussion of the settlement payments and settlement losses, see Note 5.

Amounts recognized in the Consolidated Balance Sheet:
 2016 2015 2019 2018
Accrued benefit liability - current $(16) $(13) $(4) $(5)
Accrued benefit liability - non-current (140) (117) (125) (113)
 $(156) $(130) $(129) $(118)


The accumulated benefit obligation was $960984 million and $1,088849 million at December 31, 20162019 and December 26, 201531, 2018, respectively.

Information for pension plans with an accumulated benefit obligation in excess of plan assets:
 2016 2015 2019 2018
Projected benefit obligation $993
 $101
 $1,015
 $873
Accumulated benefit obligation 960
 88
 984
 849
Fair value of plan assets 837
 
 886
 755




Information for pension plans with a projected benefit obligation in excess of plan assets:
 2016 2015 2019 2018
Projected benefit obligation $993
 $1,134
 $1,015
 $873
Accumulated benefit obligation 960
 1,088
 984
 849
Fair value of plan assets 837
 1,004
 886
 755


Components of net periodic benefit cost:
Net periodic benefit cost 2016 2015 2014
 2019 2018 2017
Service cost $17
 $18
 $17
 $6
 $8
 $10
Interest cost 54
 55
 54
 39
 38
 41
Amortization of prior service cost(a)
 6

1

1
 6

5

6
Expected return on plan assets (65) (62) (56) (44) (44) (45)
Amortization of net loss 6
 45
 17
 1
 16
 5
Net periodic benefit cost $18
 $57
 $33
 $8
 $23
 $17

Additional (gain) loss recognized due to:

Settlements(b)
 $32
 $5
 $6

Additional (gain) loss recognized due to:

Settlement charges(b)
 $3
 $
 $19
Special termination benefits $3
 $1
 $3
 $
 $1
 $2
Pension data adjustment(c)
 $
 $
 $22

(a)Prior service costs are amortized on a straight-line basis over the average remaining service period of employees expected to receive benefits.

(b)Settlement losses result when benefit payments exceed the sum of the service cost and interest cost within a plan during the year. These losses were recorded in Other pension (income) expense.



(c)Reflects a non-cash, out-of-year charge related to the adjustment of certain historical deferred vested liability balances in the Plan during the first quarter of 2017 recorded in Other pension (income) expense. See Note 4.

Pension gains (losses) in AOCI:
 2016 2015 2019 2018
Beginning of year $(170) $(319) $(123) $(160)
Net actuarial gain (loss) (54) 124
 (22) 17
Curtailments 4
 2
 
 
Amortization of net loss 6
 45
 1
 16
Amortization of prior service cost 6
 1
 6
 5
Prior service cost (4) (28) (2) (1)
Settlement charges 32
 5
 4
 
End of year $(180) $(170) $(136) $(123)


Accumulated pre-tax losses recognized within AOCI:
 2016 2015 2019 2018
Actuarial net loss $(150) $(138) $(118) $(101)
Prior service cost (30) (32) (18) (22)
 $(180) $(170) $(136) $(123)

Weighted-average assumptions used to determine benefit obligations at the measurement dates:
  2019 2018
Discount rate 3.50% 4.60%
Rate of compensation increase 3.00% 3.00%

Weighted-average assumptions used to determine the net periodic benefit cost for fiscal years:
  2019 2018 
2017(a)
Discount rate 4.60% 3.90% 4.53%
Long-term rate of return on plan assets 5.75% 5.65% 6.06%
Rate of compensation increase 3.00% 3.75% 3.75%


The estimated net loss that will be amortized from AOCI into net periodic pension cost(a)    Reflects a weighted average due to interim re-measurements in 2017 is $7 million.  The estimated prior service cost that will be amortized from AOCI into net periodic pension cost in 2017 is $5 million.



Weighted-average assumptions used to determine benefit obligations at the measurement dates:
  2016 2015
Discount rate 4.60% 4.90%
Rate of compensation increase 3.75% 3.75%

Weighted-average assumptions used to determine the net periodic benefit cost for fiscal years:
  2016 2015 2014
Discount rate 4.90% 4.30% 5.40%
Long-term rate of return on plan assets 6.75% 6.75% 6.90%
Rate of compensation increase 3.75% 3.75% 3.75%

2017.

Our estimated long-term rate of return on plan assets represents the weighted-average of expected future returns on the asset categories included in our target investment allocation based primarily on the historical returns for each asset category.category and future growth expectations.

Plan Assets

The fair values of our pension plan assets at December 31, 20162019 and December 26, 201531, 2018 by asset category and level within the fair value hierarchy are as follows:


  2016 2015
Level 1:    
Cash $2
 $3
Cash Equivalents(a)
 12
 9
Fixed Income Securities - U.S. Corporate(b)
 172
 221
Equity Securities – U.S. Large cap(b)
 244
 310
Equity Securities – U.S. Mid cap(b)
 41
 50
Equity Securities – U.S. Small cap(b)
 43
 51
Equity Securities – Non-U.S.(b)
 83
 100
Level 2:    
     
Fixed Income Securities – U.S. Corporate(c)
 76
 68
Fixed Income Securities – U.S. Government and Government Agencies(d)
 152
 195
Fixed Income Securities – Other(d)
 31
 17
Total fair value of plan assets(e)
 $856
 $1,024

  2019 2018
Level 1:    
Cash $5
 $3
Cash Equivalents(a)
 13
 10
Fixed Income Securities - U.S. Corporate(b)
 161
 140
Equity Securities – U.S. Large cap(b)
 268
 215
Equity Securities – U.S. Mid cap(b)
 44
 35
Equity Securities – U.S. Small cap(b)
 43
 34
Equity Securities – Non-U.S.(b)
 88
 74
Level 2:    
Fixed Income Securities – U.S. Corporate(c)
 120
 106
Fixed Income Securities – U.S. Government and Government Agencies(d)
 274
 161
Fixed Income Securities – Other(d)
 39
 18
Total fair value of plan assets(e)
 $1,055
 $796


(a)Short-term investments in money market funds.

(b)Securities held in common trusts.

(c)Investments held directly by the Plan.

(d)Includes securities held in common trusts and investments held directly by the Plan.

(e)
20162019 and 20152018 exclude net unsettled trade payables of $19169 million and $2041 million, respectively.

Our primary objectives regarding the investment strategy for the Plan’s assets are to reduce interest rate and market risk and to provide adequate liquidity to meet immediate and future payment requirements.  To achieve these objectives, we are using a combination of active and passive investment strategies.  The Plan's equity securities, currently targeted to be 50% of our investment mix, consist primarily of low-cost index funds focused on achieving long-term capital appreciation.  The Plan diversifies its equity risk by investing in several different U.S. and foreign market index funds.  Investing in these index funds provides the Plan with the adequate liquidity required to fund benefit payments and plan expenses.  The fixed income asset allocation, currently targeted


to be 50% of our mix, is actively managed and consists of long-duration fixed income securities that help to reduce exposure to interest rate variation and to better correlate asset maturities with obligations. The fair values of all pension plan assets are determined based on closing market prices or net asset values.

A mutual fund held as an investment by the Plan includes shares of YUM Common Stock valued at $0.3 million and $0.5$0.3 million at both December 31, 20162019 and December 26, 201531, 2018, respectively, (less than 1% of total plan assets in each instance).

Benefit Payments

The benefits expected to be paid in each of the next five years and in the aggregate for the five years thereafter are set forth below:

Year ended:  
2017 $128
2018 45
2019 42
2020 43
2021 46
2022 - 2026 259
Year ended:  
2020 $43
2021 47
2022 49
2023 52
2024 53
2025 - 2029 287

Expected benefitsbenefit payments are estimated based on the same assumptions used to measure our benefit obligation on the measurement date and include benefits attributable to estimated future employee service.



International Pension Plans

We also sponsor various defined benefit plans covering certain of our non-U.S. employees, the most significant of which are in the UK. Both of our UK plans have previously been frozen such that they are closed to new participants and existing participants can no longer earn future service credits.

At the end of 20162019 and 2015,2018, the projected benefit obligations of these UK plans totaled $261$290 million and $233 million, respectively and plan assets totaled $305$372 million and $291$319 million, respectively. These plans were both in a net overfunded position at the end of 20162019 and 20152018 and related expense amounts recorded in each of 2016, 20152019, 2018 and 20142017 were not significant.

The funding rules for our pension plans outside of the U.S. vary from country to country and depend on many factors including discount rates, performance of plan assets, local laws and regulations. We do not plan to make significant contributions to either of our UK plans in 2017.2020.

Retiree Medical Benefits

Our post-retirement plan provides health care benefits, principally to U.S. salaried retirees and their dependents, and includes retiree cost-sharing provisions.provisions and a cap on our liability.  This plan was previously amended such that any salaried employee hired or rehired by YUM after September 30, 2001 is not eligible to participate in this plan.  Employees hired prior to September 30, 2001 are eligible for benefits if they meet age and service requirements and qualify for retirement benefits.  We fund our post-retirement plan as benefits are paid.

At the end of 20162019 and 20152018, the accumulated post-retirement benefit obligation was $5544 million and $59$45 million,, respectively.  Actuarial pre-tax gains of $10$9 million and $8$13 million were recognized in AOCI at the end of 20162019 and 2015,2018, respectively. The net periodic benefit cost recorded was $3$1 million in both 2016 and 2015 and $52019, $2 million in 2014,2018 and $2 million in 2017, the majority of which is interest cost on the accumulated post-retirement benefit obligation.  The weighted-average assumptions used to determine benefit obligations and net periodic benefit cost for the post-retirement medical plan are identical to those as shown for the U.S. pension plans.  Our assumed heath care cost trend rates for the following year as of 2016 and 2015 are 6.6% and 6.8%, respectively, with expected ultimate trend rates of 4.5% reached in 2038.

There is a cap on our medical liability for certain retirees.  The cap for Medicare-eligible retirees was reached in 2000 and the cap for non-Medicare eligible retirees was reached in 2014; with the cap, our annual cost per retiree will not increase.  A one-percentage-point increase or decrease in assumed health care cost trend rates would have less than a $4 million impact on total service and


interest cost and on the post-retirement benefit obligation.  The benefits expected to be paid in each of the next five years are approximately $54 million and in aggregate for the five years thereafter are $1914 million.

U.S. Retiree Savings Plan

We sponsor a contributory plan to provide retirement benefits under the provisions of Section 401(k) of the Internal Revenue Code (the “401(k) Plan”) for eligible U.S. salaried and hourly employees.  Participants are able to elect to contribute up to 75% of eligible compensation on a pre-tax basis.  Participants may allocate their contributions to one or any combination of multiple investment options or a self-managed account within the 401(k) Plan.  We match 100% of the participant’s contribution to the 401(k) Plan up to 6% of eligible compensation.  We recognized as compensation expense our total matching contribution of $1411 million in 20162019, $13$12 million in 20152018 and $1213 million in 20142017.

Note 1615 – Share-based and Deferred Compensation Plans

Overview

At year end 2015,2019, we had fourone stock award plansplan in effect: the YUM!Yum! Brands, Inc. Long-Term Incentive Plan (the “LTIP”),. Under the 1997 Long-Term Incentive Plan, the YUM! Brands, Inc. Restaurant General Manager Stock Option Plan and the YUM! Brands, Inc. SharePower Plan. In May 2016, concurrent with Shareholder approval to increase the authorized shares available for issuance under the LTIP, we cancelled authorized but unissued awards under the other three plans and will only issue new awards under the LTIP. Outstanding awards under the other plans will continue to be governed by their original award terms and will be issued under the LTIP. Under all our award terms, the exercise price of stock options and SARs granted must be equal to or greater than the average market price or the ending market price of the Company’s stock on the date of grant.

Potential awards to employees and non-employee directors under the LTIP includesinclude stock options, incentive stock options, SARs, restricted stock, restricted stock units (“RSUs”), performance restricted stock units, performance share units (“PSUs”) and performance units.  We have issued only stock options, SARs, RSUs and PSUs under the LTIP.  While awards under the LTIP can have varying vesting provisions and exercise periods, outstanding awards under the LTIP vest in periods ranging from immediate to five years. Stock options and SARs generally expire ten years after grant.

At year end 20162019, approximately 2726 million shares were available for future share-based compensation grants under the LTIP.

Our EID Plan allows participants to defer receipt of a portion of their annual salary and all or a portion of their incentive compensation.  As defined by the EID Plan, we credit the amounts deferred with earnings based on the investment options selected


by the participants.  These investment options are limited to cash, phantom shares of our Common Stock, phantom shares of a Stock Index Fund and phantom shares of a Bond Index Fund.  Investments in cash and phantom shares of both index funds will be distributed in cash at a date as elected by the employee and therefore are classified as a liability on our Consolidated Balance Sheets. We recognize compensation expense for the appreciation or the depreciation, if any, of investments in cash and both of the index funds.  Deferrals into the phantom shares of our Common Stock will be distributed in shares of our Common Stock, under the LTIP,  at a date as elected by the employee and therefore are classified in Common Stock on our Consolidated Balance Sheets.  We do not recognize compensation expense for the appreciation or the depreciation, if any, of investments in phantom shares of our Common Stock.  Our EID plan also allows certain participants to defer incentive compensation to purchase phantom shares of our Common Stock and receive a 33% Company match on the amount deferred.  Deferrals receiving a match are similar to aan RSU award in that participants will generally forfeit both the match and incentive compensation amounts deferred if they voluntarily separate from employment during a vesting period that is two years from the date of deferral.  We expense the intrinsic value of the match and the incentive compensation amount over the requisite service period which includes the vesting period.

Historically, the Company has repurchased shares on the open market in excess of the amount necessary to satisfy award exercises and expects to continue to do so in 2017.2020.

In connection with the Separation of our China business, under the provisions of our LTIP, employee stock options, SARs, RSUs and PSUs were adjusted to maintain the pre-spin intrinsic value of the awards. Depending on the tax laws of the country of employment, awards were modified using either the shareholder method or the employer method. Share-based compensation as recorded in Net Income is based on the amortization of the fair value for both YUM and Yum China awards held by YUM employees. Share issuances for Yum China awards held by YUM employees will be satisfied by Yum China. Share issuances for YUM awards held by Yum China employees will beare being satisfied by YUM. Share-based compensation for YUM employees is based on both YUM and Yum China awards held by those employees.

The shareholder method was based on the premise that employees holding YUM awards prior to the Separation should receive an equal number of awards of both YUM and Yum China. For stock options and SARs, exercise prices of these post-Separation


YUM and Yum China awards were established that, on a combined basis, maintained the intrinsic value on the YUM award prior to the Separation. The exercise prices provided for an initial intrinsic value in each of the post-Separation YUM and YUM China awards that was proportionate to the market value of the two companies on November 1, 2016. For RSUs and PSUs modified under the shareholder method, each YUM award was modified into one YUM award and one Yum China award.

Under the employershareholder method, employees holding YUM awards prior to the Separation had their awards converted into awards of the company that they worked for subsequent to the Separation. For stock options and SARs modified under the employer method, the exercise prices of the awards were modified to maintain the pre-Separation intrinsic value of the awards in relation to the post-Separation stock price of the applicable company. For RSUs and PSUs modified under the employer method, the number of awards was modified to maintain the pre-Separation intrinsic value of the awards in relation to the post-Separation stock price of the applicable company.

As a result of the modifications made to outstanding awards under our shared-based and deferred compensation plans as described above, the total number of YUM stock option and SAR awards decreased by approximately 1.3 million shares. The total number of YUM RSU and PSU awards did not change significantly. The modifications to the outstanding equity awards resulted in an insignificant amount of additional compensation expense.

Investmentsinvestments in phantom shares of our Common Stock held within our EID Plan by employees that remained with YUM post-Separation that were partially converted into phantom investments in Yum China will now be allowed to be transferred into cash, phantom shares of a Stock Index Fund and phantom shares of a Bond Index Fund within the EID Plan. As such,China. Through October 31, 2018, distributions of current investments in phantom shares of Yum China may nowcould be paidsettled in cash, as opposed to stock, at a date as elected by the employee and, therefore, arewere classified as a liability and remeasured to fair value at each reporting period in our Consolidated Balance Sheet. During 2018 and 2017, we recorded a $3 million credit and a $18 million charge, respectively, within G&A related to these awards (See Note 4).

As of October 31, 2018, deferrals in phantom shares of Yum China common stock were no longer an investment option within our EID Plan and any balances relating to these shares were moved to another available EID Plan investment option as selected by the participants.  Amounts directed into cash or phantom shares of a Stock Index Fund or a Bond Index Fund remained classified as a liability and appreciation or depreciation in these investments from the transfer date forward are recognized as compensation expense. Any amounts directed into phantom shares of YUM Common Stock were reclassified to Common Stock on our Consolidated Balance Sheets. AtSheet.  We do not recognize compensation expense for the Separation date and subsequent to the spinoff through December 31, 2016, we recorded G&A expense related to the cumulative mark-to-market valueappreciation or depreciation, if any, of these awardsinvestments in excess of previously recorded fair value charges totaling $28 million. Awards that are remaining in the Yum China investment option when they are due for distribution will be paid out inphantom shares of Yum China stock.our Common Stock.

Award Valuation

We estimated the fair value of each stock option and SAR award as of the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model with the following weighted-average assumptions:

 2016 2015 2014 2019 2018 2017
Risk-free interest rate 1.4% 1.3% 1.6% 2.5% 2.5% 1.9%
Expected term (years) 6.4 years
 6.4 years
 6.2 years
Expected term 6.5 years
 6.5 years
 6.4 years
Expected volatility 27.0% 26.9% 29.7% 22.0% 22.0% 22.9%
Expected dividend yield 2.6% 2.2% 2.1% 1.8% 1.8% 1.8%


The above table does not reflect valuations performed in connection with modifications to awards made in connection with the Separation. All option and SAR awards granted during 2016 occurred prior to the Separation.

We believe it is appropriate to group our stock option and SAR awards into two homogeneous groups when estimating expected term.  These groups consist of grants made primarily to restaurant-level employees, which cliff-vest after 4 years and expire 10 years after grant, and grants made to executives, which typically have a graded vesting schedule of 25% per year over 4 years and expire 10 years after grant.  We use a single weighted-average term for our awards that have a graded vesting schedule.  Based on analysis of our historical exercise and post-vesting termination behavior, we have determined that our restaurant-level employees and our executives exercised the awards on average after 4.755 years and 6.5 years, respectively.

When determining expected volatility, we consider both historical volatility of our stock as well as implied volatility associated with our publicly tradedpublicly-traded options.  The expected dividend yield is based on the annual dividend yield at the time of grant.



The fair values of PSU awards without market-based conditions and RSU awards are based on the closing price of our Common Stock on the date of grant. The fair values of PSU awards with market-based conditions have been valued based on the outcome of a Monte Carlo simulation.



Award Activity

Stock Options and SARs

  
Shares
(in thousands)
 
Weighted-Average Exercise
Price
 Weighted- Average Remaining Contractual Term (years) Aggregate Intrinsic Value (in millions)
Outstanding at the beginning of the year 16,191
   $51.84
    
Granted 2,332
   93.52
    
Exercised (3,210)   38.16
    
Forfeited or expired (449)   75.29
    
Outstanding at the end of the year 14,864
(a) 
  60.76
 5.62
 $594
Exercisable at the end of the year 9,283
   $49.38
 4.10
 $477
  
Shares
(in thousands)
 
Weighted-Average Exercise
Price(a)
 
Weighted- Average Remaining Contractual Term (years)(a)
 Aggregate Intrinsic Value (in millions)
Outstanding at the beginning of the year 25,933
   $51.79
    
Granted 4,329
   70.64
    
Exercised (5,886)   40.84
    
Forfeited or expired (1,101)   70.66
    
Outstanding at October 31, 2016 23,275
   57.20
    
Equitable adjustment (1,283)
(b) 
       
Exercised (631)   24.66
    
Forfeited or expired (119)   52.13
    
Outstanding at the end of the year 21,242
(c) 
  $40.78
 5.63
 $479
Exercisable at the end of the year 13,710
   $35.37
 4.21
 $383


(a)Activity and amounts that occurred after October 31, 2016 reflect modifications related to the Separation.

(b)Adjustment to maintain intrinsic value upon Separation.

(c)
Outstanding awards include 1,341782 options and 19,90114,082 SARs with weighted average exercise prices of $33.33$45.03 and $41.28,$61.64, respectively. Outstanding awards represent YUM awards held by employees of both YUM and Yum China.

The weighted-average grant-date fair value of stock options and SARs granted during 20162019, 20152018 and 20142017 was $14.4019.82, $15.9516.45 and $17.2814.08, respectively.  The total intrinsic value of stock options and SARs exercised during the years ended December 31, 20162019, December 26, 201531, 2018 and December 27, 201431, 2017, was $263204 million, $153195 million and $141154 million, respectively.

As of December 31, 20162019, $6149 million of unrecognized compensation cost related to unvested stock options and SARs, which will be reduced by any forfeitures that occur, is expected to be recognized over a remaining weighted-average period of approximately 1.81.7 years.  This reflects unrecognized cost for both YUM and Yum China awards held by YUM employees. The total fair value at grant date of awards for both YUM and Yum China awards held by YUM employees that vested during 20162019, 20152018 and 20142017 was $4131 million, $4228 million and $3433 million, respectively.

RSUs and PSUs

As of December 31, 20162019, there was $2130 million of unrecognized compensation cost related to 0.91.1 million unvested RSUs and PSUs.PSUs, none of which related to Yum China common stock. The total fair value at grant date of awards that vested during 2019, 2018 and 2017 was $14 million, $16 million and $10 million, respectively.

Impact on Net Income

The components of share-based compensation expense and the related income tax benefits are shown in the following table:

  2016 2015 2014
Options and SARs $38
 $41
 $39
Restricted Stock Units 38
 3
 5
Performance Share Units 4
 2
 1
Total Share-based Compensation Expense $80
(a) 
$46
 $45
Deferred Tax Benefit recognized $26
 $15
 $14
       
EID compensation expense not share-based $5
 $1
 $8
  2019 2018 2017 
Options and SARs $39
 $37
 $30
 
Restricted Stock Units 12
 6
 26
 
Performance Share Units 8
 7
 9
 
Total Share-based Compensation Expense $59
 $50
(a) 
$65
(a) 
Deferred Tax Benefit recognized $9
 $9
 $22
(b) 
        
EID compensation expense not share-based $17
 $(2) $12
 

(a)Includes $3 million of appreciation and $18 million of depreciation in the market price of Yum China's stock in 2018 and 2017, respectively. See Note 4.



(a)    Includes $30 million due to modifications(b)    Deferred tax benefit recognized does not reflect the impact of awards in connection with the Separation that was not allocated to any of our operating segments for performance purposes.Tax Act. See Note 5.17.

Cash received from stock option exercises for 20162019, 20152018 and 20142017, was $51 million, $125.5 million and $2912 million, respectively.  Tax benefits realized on our tax returns from tax deductions associated with share-based compensation for 20162019, 20152018 and 20142017 totaled $10966 million, $6260 million and $58153 million, respectively.


Note 1716 – Shareholders’ EquityDeficit

Under the authority of our Board of Directors, we repurchased shares of our Common Stock during 20162019, 20152018 and 20142017.  All amounts exclude applicable transaction fees.  
 
  
Shares Repurchased
(thousands)
  
Dollar Value of Shares
Repurchased
 
Authorization Date 2016
  2015
  2014
  2016
  2015
  2014
 
November 2016 1,337
  
  
  $85
  $
  $
 
May 2016 50,435
  
  
  4,200
  
  
 
March 2016 2,823
  
  
  229
  
  
 
December 2015 13,368
  932
  
  933
  67
  
 
November 2014 
  13,231
  
  
  1,000
  
 
November 2013 
  1,779
  8,488
  
  133
  617
 
November 2012 
  
  2,737
  
  
  203
 
Total 67,963
(a) 
 15,942
  11,225
  $5,447
(a) 
 $1,200
  $820
 
  
Shares Repurchased
(thousands)
  
Dollar Value of Shares
Repurchased
 
Authorization Date 2019
  2018
  2017
  2019
  2018
  2017
 
August 2018 7,788
  10,003
  
  810
  894
  
 
November 2017 
  18,240
  
  
  1,500
  
 
November 2016 
  
  26,561
  
  
  1,915
 
Total 7,788
(a) 
 28,243
(a) 
 26,561
(b) 
 $810
(a) 
 $2,394
(a) 
 $1,915
(b) 

(a)Includes2019 amount excludes and 2018 amount includes the effect of $5 million in share repurchases (0.1 million shares) with trade dates on, or prior to, December 31, 2018 but settlement dates subsequent to December 31, 2018.

(b)2017 amount excludes the effect of $45 million in share repurchases (0.7 million shares) with trade dates prior to December 31, 2016 but settlement dates subsequent to December 31, 2016.

On November 17, 2016,21, 2019, our Board of Directors authorized share repurchases through December 2017June 2021 of up to $2.0$2 billion (excluding applicable transaction fees). On of our outstanding Common Stock. As of December 31, 20162019, we have remaining capacity to repurchase up to $1.9$2 billion of our Common Stock under this authorization. Unutilized share repurchase capacity of $296 million under the August 2018 authorization expired on December 31, 2019.



Changes in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) ("OCI")AOCI are presented below.
  
Translation Adjustments and Gains (Losses) From Intra-Entity Transactions of a Long-Term Nature(a)
 
Pension and Post-Retirement Benefits(b)
 
Derivative Instruments(c)
 Total
Balance at December 27, 2014, net of tax$29
 $(210) $(9) $(190)
         
Gains (losses) arising during the year classified into accumulated OCI, net of tax (250) 63
 28
 (159)
         
(Gains) losses reclassified from accumulated OCI, net of tax 112
 34
 (36) 110
         
OCI, net of tax (138) 97
 (8) (49)
         
Balance at December 26, 2015, net of tax$(109) $(113) $(17) $(239)
         
Gains (losses) arising during the year classified into accumulated OCI, net of tax (146) (42) 29
 (159)
         
(Gains) losses reclassified from accumulated OCI, net of tax (11) 28
 (5) 12
         
OCI, net of tax (157) (14) 24
 (147)
         
Separation of China business (47) 
 
 (47)
         
Balance at December 31,2016, net of tax$(313) $(127) $7
 $(433)
         
  
Translation Adjustments and Gains (Losses) From Intra-Entity Transactions of a Long-Term Nature(a)
 
Pension and Post-Retirement Benefits(b)
 
Derivative Instruments(c)
 Total
Balance at December 31, 2017, net of tax $(174) $(106) $9
 $(271)
         
Adoption of accounting standards 21
(d) 
(17)
(e) 
(2)
(e) 
2
         
OCI, net of tax        
         
Gains (losses) arising during the year classified into AOCI, net of tax (88) 24
 20
 (44)
         
(Gains) losses reclassified from AOCI, net of tax (4) 17
 (34) (21)
         
  (92) 41
 (14) (65)
         
Balance at December 31, 2018, net of tax $(245) $(82) $(7) $(334)
         
OCI, net of tax        
         
Gains (losses) arising during the year classified into AOCI, net of tax 24
 (30) (35) (41)
         
(Gains) losses reclassified from AOCI, net of tax 
 8
 (21) (13)
         
  24
 (22) (56) (54)
         
Balance at December 31, 2019, net of tax $(221) $(104) $(63) $(388)
         

(a)Amounts reclassified from accumulated OCI during 2016 and 2015AOCI are due to substantialsubstantially complete liquidations of foreign entities related to the KFC and Pizza Hut Australia and MexicoBrazil refranchising transactions respectively.during 2018.

(b)Amounts reclassified from accumulated OCIAOCI for pension and post-retirement benefit plans losses during 2019 include amortization of net losses of $2 million, amortization of prior service cost of $5 million, settlement charges of $3 million and related income tax benefit of $2 million. Amounts reclassified from AOCI for pension and post-retirement benefit plan losses during 20162018 include amortization of net losses of $7 million, settlement charges of $32$17 million, amortization of prior service cost of $5 million and related income tax benefit of $16 million. Amounts reclassified from accumulated OCI for pension and post-retirement benefit plan losses during 2015 include amortization of net losses of $46 million, settlement charges of $5 million, amortization of prior service cost of $2 million and related income tax benefit of $19 million. See Note 15.14.

(c)    See Note 13 for details on amounts reclassified from accumulated OCI.
(c)See Note 12 for details on amounts reclassified from AOCI.

(d)Represents the impact of foreign currency translation from the adoption of Topic 606. See Notes 2 and 4.

87

(e)During the quarter ended March 31, 2018, we adopted a standard that allowed for the reclassification from AOCI to Accumulated deficit for stranded tax effects resulting from the Tax Act.


Note 1817 – Income Taxes

U.S. and foreign income before taxes are set forth below:

 2016 2015 2014 2019 2018 2017
U.S. $366
 $479
 $506
 $466
 $726
 $662
Foreign 952
 782
 868
 907
 1,113
 1,612
 $1,318
 $1,261
 $1,374
 $1,373
 $1,839
 $2,274


The details of our income tax provision (benefit) are set forth below:

   2016 2015 2014   2019 2018 2017
Current: Federal $123
 $268
 $239
 Federal $129
 $102
 $(2)
 Foreign 161
 131
 173
 Foreign 166
 181
 290
 State 13
 28
 2
 State 16
 25
 12
   $297
 $427
 414
   $311
 $308
 $300
            
Deferred: Federal $18
 $(117) (34) Federal $(16) $(24) $603
 Foreign 3
 15
 (13) Foreign (213) 5
 19
 State 6
 
 1
 State (3) 8
 12
   $27
 $(102) $(46)   $(232) $(11) $634
   $324

$325

$368
   $79

$297

$934


The reconciliation of income taxes calculated at the U.S. federal statutory rate to our effective tax rate is set forth below:

 2016 2015 2014 2019 2018 2017
U.S. federal statutory rate $461
 35.0 % $441
 35.0 % $481
 35.0 % 21.0 % 21.0 % 35.0 %
State income tax, net of federal tax benefit 15
 1.1
 12
 0.9
 8
 0.6
State income tax, net of federal tax 0.8
 1.0
 0.5
Statutory rate differential attributable to foreign operations (136) (10.3) (180) (14.3) (147) (10.7) 1.6
 (12.3) (9.3)
Adjustments to reserves and prior years (11) (0.9) 13
 1.0
 2
 0.1
 4.2
 2.8
 0.5
Share-based compensation (4.0) (2.5) (5.1)
Change in valuation allowances (3) (0.2) 41
 3.3
 22
 1.6
 (2.6) 8.5
 1.5
Intercompany restructuring (16.1) 
 
Tax Act Enactment 
 (1.9) 19.1
Other, net (2) (0.1) (2) (0.1) 2
 0.1
 0.8
 (0.4) (1.1)
Effective income tax rate $324
 24.6 % $325
 25.8 % $368
 26.7 % 5.7 % 16.2 % 41.1 %


Statutory rate differential attributable to foreign operations.  This item includes local country taxes, withholding taxes, and shareholder-level taxes, net of foreign tax credits.  The favorableIn 2019, this expense included the full year impact of the global intangible low-taxed income (GILTI) provisions of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017. In 2018, this benefit was positively impacted by approximately 8 percentage points due to a transaction resulting in the recognition of excess foreign tax credits that were fully offset by expense included in 'Change in valuation allowances'. 2017 is primarily attributable tofavorably impacted by a majority of our income being earned outside of the U.S. where tax rates arewere generally lower than the U.S. rate.

In 2015, this benefit was positively impacted by the repatriation of current year foreign earnings as we recognized excess foreign tax credits, resulting from the related effective foreign tax rate being higher than the U.S. federal statutory rate.

Adjustments to reserves and prior years.  This item includes: (1) changes in tax reserves, including interest thereon, established for potential exposure we may incur if a taxing authority takes a position on a matter contrary to our position; and (2) the effects of reconciling income tax amounts recorded in our Consolidated Statements of Income to amounts reflected on our tax returns, including any adjustments to the Consolidated Balance Sheets. TheIn 2019, this item was unfavorably impacted by $31 million in reserves related to the inclusion of stock based compensation in cost sharing arrangements that was largely offset by the benefit from the utilization of foreign tax credits included in 'Change in valuation allowances' as well as $34 million in reserves related


to taxes recorded associated with a prior year divestiture. This unfavorable impact was partially offset by the reversal of certain effects or changes may offset items reflecteda $20 million reserve established in 2018 due to the 'Statutoryfavorable resolution of an income tax rate differential attributable todispute in a foreign operations' line.market. In 2018, this item was unfavorably impacted by the aforementioned $20 million reserve and a $19 million charge for the correction of an error associated with the tax recorded on a prior year divestiture.

In 2016, this item was favorably impacted by the resolutionShare-based compensation. 2019, 2018 and 2017 includes $55 million, $47 million and $117 million, respectively, of uncertainexcess tax positions in the U.S.

In 2014, this item was favorably impacted by the resolution of uncertainbenefit related to share-based compensation. The 2017 excess tax positions in certain foreign jurisdictions.


benefits were largely associated with deferred compensation payouts to recently retired employees.

Change in valuation allowances.  This item relates to changes for deferred tax assets generated or utilized during the current year and changes in our judgment regarding the likelihood of using deferred tax assets that existed at the beginning of the year.  The impact of certain changes may offset items reflected in the 'Statutory rate differential attributable to foreign operations' line.line and the '

Adjustments to reserves and prior years' line.In 2016, $32019, $35 million of net tax benefit was driven by $14a $45 million tax benefit attributable to changes in netjudgment regarding deferred tax assets that existed at the beginning of the year largely resulting from the utilization of foreign tax credits as discussed in 'Adjustments to reserves and prior years' sections above. This benefit was partially offset by $9 million of expense for valuation allowances recorded against deferred tax assets generated in the current year and $17year. This amount excludes a valuation allowance of $373 million which is included in net tax benefit for valuation allowances resulting from a change in judgment regarding the future use of certain deferred tax assets that existed at the beginning of the year.

'Intercompany Restructuring' line. In 2015, $412018, $156 million of net tax expense was driven by $17 million for valuation allowances recorded against deferred tax assets generated in the current year and $24year. This expense was largely offset by a benefit related to a transaction resulting in the recognition of excess foreign tax credits in 'Statutory rate differential attributable to foreign operations'. This amount also excludes a valuation allowance release of $78 million, which is included in net tax expense resulting from a change in judgment regarding the future use of certain deferred tax assets that existed at the beginning of the year.

'Tax Act Enactment' line. In 2014, $222017, $34 million of net tax expense was driven by $28 million for valuation allowances recorded against deferred tax assets generated duringin the current year, partially offsetyear. This amount excludes a valuation allowance of $189 million, which is included in the 'Tax Act Enactment' line.

Intercompany Restructuring. In December 2019, we completed an intercompany restructuring that resulted in the transfer of certain intellectual property rights held by $6wholly owned foreign subsidiaries primarily to the U.S. and the United Kingdom (UK). The intellectual property rights transferred to the UK resulted in a step up in the tax basis for UK tax purposes resulting in a deferred tax asset of $586 million. The deferred tax asset was analyzed for realizability and a valuation allowance of $366 million in netwas established representing the portion of the deferred tax asset not likely to be realized. The recognized tax benefit resulting fromof $220 million is amortizable for UK tax purposes over a changetwenty year period. The transfer of certain intellectual property rights to other non-UK jurisdictions resulted in judgment regarding the future userecording of certaindeferred tax assets of $13 million and related valuation allowances of $7 million for deferred tax assets that existed atare not likely to be realized, for a net tax benefit of $6 million.

Tax Act Enactment. On December 22, 2017, the beginningU.S. government enacted comprehensive Federal tax legislation commonly referred to as the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 (the "Tax Act"). The Tax Act significantly modifies the U.S. corporate income tax system by, among other things, reducing the federal income tax rate from 35% to 21%, limiting certain deductions, including limiting the deductibility of interest expense to 30% of U.S. Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation and Amortization, imposing a mandatory one-time deemed repatriation tax on accumulated foreign earnings and creating a territorial tax system that changes the manner in which foreign earnings are subject to U.S. tax.

On December 22, 2017, the SEC staff issued Staff Accounting Bulletin 118 which allowed us to record provisional amounts related to the impacts of the year.Tax Act during a measurement period not to extend beyond one year of the enactment date. As a result, we recorded a $434 million provisional estimate of the effect of the Tax Act in 2017. This expense was comprised of an estimate of our deemed repatriation tax, the remeasurement of net deferred tax assets resulting from the permanent reduction in the U.S. tax rate to 21%, and establishment of a valuation allowance on foreign tax credit carryforwards which are unlikely to be realized under the U.S. territorial tax system.

In 2018, we completed the accounting for the tax effects of the enactment of the Tax Act. As a result of the Tax Act, we recorded cumulative net tax expense of $399 million ($35 million benefit in 2018 and $434 million expense in 2017). This net expense was comprised of $241 million for our deemed repatriation tax liability, $47 million related to the remeasurement of our net deferred tax assets to the 21% U.S. tax rate and $111 million to establish a valuation allowance on foreign tax credits that are unlikely to be realized under the U.S. territorial tax system.

Other.  This item primarily includes the net impact of permanent differences related to current year earnings as well as U.S. tax creditscredits. In 2018 and deductions.2017, this item was primarily driven by the favorable impact of certain international refranchising gains.

Companies subject to the Global Intangible Low-Taxed Income provision (GILTI) have the option to account for the GILTI tax as a period cost if and when incurred, or to recognize deferred taxes for outside basis temporary differences expected to reverse as GILTI. The Company has elected to account for GILTI as a period cost.



The details of 20162019 and 20152018 deferred tax assets (liabilities) are set forth below:
  2019 2018
Operating losses $176
 $180
Capital losses 3
 3
Tax credit carryforwards 230
 266
Employee benefits 85
 72
Share-based compensation 55
 62
Self-insured casualty claims 6
 7
Lease-related liabilities 199
 43
Various liabilities 43
 43
Intangible assets 602
 8
Property, plant and equipment 21
 19
Deferred income and other 85
 45
Gross deferred tax assets 1,505
 748
Deferred tax asset valuation allowances (787) (454)
Net deferred tax assets $718
 $294
Intangible assets, including goodwill $(40) $(42)
Property, plant and equipment (44) (33)
Operating lease right-of-use assets (156) 
Other (31) (31)
Gross deferred tax liabilities $(271) $(106)
Net deferred tax assets (liabilities) $447

$188

Reported in Consolidated Balance Sheets as:    
Deferred income taxes $447

$195
Other liabilities and deferred credits 
 (7)
  $447

$188


  2016 2015
Operating losses $172
 $157
Capital losses 184
 41
Tax credit carryforwards 284
 282
Employee benefits 185
 152
Share-based compensation 100
 121
Self-insured casualty claims 32
 35
Lease-related liabilities 65
 69
Various liabilities 56
 64
Property, plant and equipment 37
 33
Deferred income and other 32
 51
Gross deferred tax assets 1,147
 1,005
Deferred tax asset valuation allowances (195) (205)
Net deferred tax assets $952
 $800
Intangible assets, including goodwill $(107) $(111)
Property, plant and equipment (46) (46)
Other (31) (60)
Gross deferred tax liabilities $(184) $(217)
Net deferred tax assets (liabilities) $768

$583

Reported in Consolidated Balance Sheets as:    
Deferred income taxes $774

$591
Other liabilities and deferred credits (6) (8)
  $768

$583

We have investments inAs of December 31, 2019, we had approximately $2.9 billion of unremitted foreign subsidiaries where the carrying values for financial reporting exceed the tax basis.  We have not provided deferredretained earnings. The Tax Act imposed U.S. federal tax on all post-1986 foreign Earnings and Profits accumulated through December 31, 2017. Repatriation of earnings generated after December 31, 2017, will generally be eligible for the portion100% dividends received deduction or considered a distribution of the excess that we believepreviously taxed income and, therefore, exempt from U.S. tax. Undistributed foreign earnings may still be subject to certain foreign income and withholding taxes upon repatriation.  Subject to limited exceptions, our intent is indefinitely reinvested, as we have the ability and intent to indefinitely postponereinvest our unremitted earnings outside the U.S., and our current plans do not demonstrate a need to repatriate these basis differences from reversing with a tax consequence.   We estimate thatamounts to fund our total temporary difference upon whichU.S. operations.  Thus, we have not provided deferred tax is approximately $2.1 billion at December 31, 2016.taxes, including U.S. federal and state income, foreign income, or foreign withholding taxes, for the unremitted earnings that we believe are permanently invested.   However, if these funds were repatriated in taxable transactions, we would be required to accrue and pay applicable income taxes (if any) and foreign withholding taxes.  A determination of the deferred tax liability on this amount is not practicable.


practicable due to the complexities, variables and assumptions inherent in the hypothetical calculations.

At December 31, 2016,2019, the Company has foreign operating and capital loss carryforwards of $0.5$0.4 billion, and U.S. state operating loss, capital loss and tax credit carryforwards of $1.0$1.1 billion, and U.S. federal capital loss and tax credit carryforwards of $0.7$0.2 billion. TheseThe tax losses are being carried forward in jurisdictions where we are permitted to use tax losses from prior periods to reduce future taxable incomeincome. The losses and tax credits will expire as follows:


 Year of Expiration   Year of Expiration  
 2017 2018-2021 2022-2035 Indefinitely Total 2020 2021-2024 2025-2038 Indefinitely Total
Foreign $20
 $53
 $93
 $321
 $487
 $10
 $26
 $36
 $336
 $408
U.S. state 7
 97
 908
 
 1,012
 2
 111
 1,021
 
 1,134
U.S. federal 
 524
 220
 
 744
 
 36
 178
 
 214
 $27
 $674
 $1,221
 $321
 $2,243
 $12
 $173
 $1,235
 $336
 $1,756


Valuation allowances of $0.1 billion, $0.1 billion and $0.2 billion have been recorded against the deferred tax assets established for foreign operating loss and capital loss carryforwards, the U.S. state operating loss and tax credit carryforwards, and the U.S. federal tax credit carryforwards, respectively, that are not likely to be realized.

We recognize the benefit of positions taken or expected to be taken in tax returns in the financial statementsConsolidated Financial Statements when it is more likely than not that the position would be sustained upon examination by tax authorities.  A recognized tax position is measured at the largest amount of benefit that is greater than fifty percent likely of being realized upon settlement.

The Company had $91$188 million and $98$113 million of unrecognized tax benefits at December 31, 20162019 and December 26, 2015,31, 2018, respectively, $87$8 million and $89$10 million of which are temporary in nature and if recognized, would not impact the effective income tax rate.  A reconciliation of the beginning and ending amount of unrecognized tax benefits follows:
 2016 2015 2019 2018
Beginning of Year $98
 $115
 $113
 $100
Additions on tax positions - current year 
 
 84
 19
Additions for tax positions - prior years 1
 5
 54
 
Reductions for tax positions - prior years (5) (13) (30) (5)
Reductions for settlements (1) (7) (31) 
Reductions due to statute expiration (2) (2) (2) (1)
Foreign currency translation adjustment 
 
 
 
End of Year $91
 $98
 $188
 $113


The Company believes it is reasonably possible that its unrecognized tax benefits will not materially increase oras of December 31, 2019 may decrease by approximately $26 million in the next 12 months.months due to settlements or statute of limitations expirations.

The Company’s income tax returns are subject to examination in the U.S. federal jurisdiction and numerous U.S. state and foreign jurisdictions.

The Company has settled audits with the IRS through fiscal year 2010.2010 and is currently under IRS examination for 2011-2015. Our operations in certain foreign jurisdictions remain subject to examination for tax years as far back as 2006, some of which years are currently under audit by local tax authorities.

The accrued interest and penalties related to income taxes at December 31, 20162019 and December 26, 2015 are set forth below:
  2016 2015
Accrued interest and penalties $9
 $15

31, 2018 were $26 million and $12 million, respectively.

During 2016, 20152019, 2018 and 2014,2017, the company recognized a net expense of $13 million, a net benefit of $4$2 million and a net expense of $5 million, and $11 million, respectively, for interest and penalties was recognized in our Consolidated Statements of Income as components of its Income tax provision.

In October 2016, the Company completed the separation of its China business into an independent publicly-traded company. The transaction has been treated as qualifying as a tax-free reorganization for U.S. income tax purposes. In addition, the Company considered the China indirect income tax on indirect transfers of assets by nonresident enterprises and concluded that it does not apply to the separation transaction.



90



Note 1918 – Reportable Operating Segments

See Note 1 for a description of our operating segments.
 Revenues Revenues
 2016 2015 2014 2019 2018 2017
KFC Division(a)
 $3,232

$3,235

$3,507
 $2,491

$2,644

$3,110
Pizza Hut Division(a)
 1,111

1,214

1,215
 1,027

988

893
Taco Bell Division(a)
 2,025
 1,991
 1,865
 2,079
 2,056
 1,880
Unallocated(b)(f)
 (2) 
 
 
 
 (5)
 $6,366

$6,440

$6,587
 $5,597

$5,688

$5,878


 
Operating Profit; Interest Expense, Net; and
Income Before Income Taxes
 Operating Profit
 2016 2015 2014 2019 2018 2017
KFC Division $874

$832

$876
 $1,052

$959

$981
Pizza Hut Division 370

347

347
 369

348

341
Taco Bell Division 593
 536
 478
 683
 633
 619
Unallocated Franchise and license fees and income(b)(f)
 (2) 
 
Unallocated restaurant costs(b)
 



(1)
Unallocated Franchise and license expenses(b)(f)
 (24) (71) 
Unallocated and corporate expenses(b)(g)
 (316)
(196)
(189)
Corporate and unallocated G&A expenses(b)(g)
 (188)
(171)
(230)
Unallocated Company restaurant expenses(b)(h)
 

3

10
Unallocated Franchise and property revenues(b)(f)
 
 
 (5)
Unallocated Franchise and property expenses(b)(f)
 (14) (8) (30)
Unallocated Refranchising gain (loss)(b)
 141

(23)
16
 37

540

1,083
Unallocated Other income (expense)(h)(b)
 (11)
(23)
(10) (9)
(8)
(8)
Operating Profit 1,625

1,402

1,517
 1,930

2,296

2,761
Investment income (expense), net(b)
 (67) 9
 5
Other pension income (expense)(b)(i)
 (4) (14) (47)
Interest expense, net(b)
 (307)
(141)
(143) (486)
(452)
(445)
Income Before Income Taxes $1,318

$1,261

$1,374
Income before income taxes $1,373

$1,839

$2,274

 Depreciation and Amortization Depreciation and Amortization
 2016 2015 2014 2019 2018 2017
KFC Division $173
 $186
 197
 $30
 $58
 $138
Pizza Hut Division 36
 40
 39
 15
 10
 26
Taco Bell Division 91
 88
 83
 59
 61
 82
Corporate 9
 8
 9
 8
 8
 7
 $309
 $322
 $328
 $112
 $137
 $253

 Capital Spending Capital Spending
 2016 2015 2014 2019 2018 2017
KFC Division $211
 $280
 $294
 $81
 $105
 $176
Pizza Hut Division 70
 54
 62
 33
 38
 42
Taco Bell Division 132
 116
 143
 76
 85
 95
Corporate 9
 11
 9
 6
 6
 5
 $422
 $461
 $508
 $196
 $234
 $318



 Identifiable Assets 
Identifiable Assets(d)
 2016 2015 2019 2018
KFC Division(e)
 $2,176
 $2,263
 $2,042
 $1,481
Pizza Hut Division(e)
 639
 709
 801
 701
Taco Bell Division(e)
 1,178
 1,128
 1,330
 1,074
Corporate(e)(c)
 1,485
 816
 1,058
 874
 $5,478
 $4,916
 $5,231
 $4,130

 
Long-Lived Assets(d)
 
Long-Lived Assets(e)
 2016 2015 2019 2018
KFC Division $1,583
 $1,697
 $1,179
 $868
Pizza Hut Division 375
 419
 427
 384
Taco Bell Division 859
 911
 938
 720
Corporate 35
 55
 42
 32
 $2,852
 $3,082
 $2,586
 $2,004


(a)U.S. revenues included in the combined KFC, Pizza Hut and Taco Bell Divisions totaled $3.1 billion in 2016, $3.1 billion in 2015 and $3.0 billion in 2014.2019, $2.9 billion in 2018 and $2.8 billion in 2017.

(b)    Amounts have not been allocated to any segment for performance reporting purposes.

(c)    Primarily includes cash, our Grubhub investment and deferred tax assets.

(d)    Includes property, plant and equipment, net, goodwill, and intangible assets, net.

(e)(d)U.S. identifiable assets included in the combined Corporate and KFC, Pizza Hut and Taco Bell Divisions totaled $3.1$2.7 billion and $2.3$2.0 billion in 20162019 and 2015,2018, respectively.

(e)Includes PP&E, goodwill, intangible assets, net and in 2019, Operating lease right-of-use assets.
(f)    Represents 2016 and 2015 costs associated with the KFC U.S. Acceleration Agreement. See Note 5.
(f)Represents costs associated with the KFC U.S. Acceleration Agreement and Pizza Hut U.S. Transformation Agreement. See Note 4.

(g)Amounts in 20162018 include costs related to YUM's Strategic Transformation Initiatives of $8 million, partially offset by non-cash credits associated with modifications of share-based compensation awards of $3 million. Amounts in 2017 include costs related to YUM’s Strategic Transformation Initiatives of $62$21 million, non-cash charges associated with modifications of share-based compensation awards of $30$18 million and settlement chargescosts associated with the pension deferred vested projectPizza Hut U.S. Transformation Agreement of $25$13 million. See Note 5.4.
(h)Represents depreciation reductions arising primarily from KFC restaurants that were held for sale. See Note 4.
(i)Amounts in 20162017 include losses associated with the salea non-cash charge of corporate aircraft$22 million related to YUM’s Strategic Transformation Initiativesthe adjustment of $9 million.certain historical deferred vested liability balances in our qualified U.S. plan. See Note 5.4.

Note 2019 – Contingencies

Lease Guarantees

As a result of having assigned our interest in obligations under real estate leases as a condition to the refranchising of certain Company-owned restaurants, and guaranteeing certain other leases, we are frequently contingentlysecondarily liable on lease agreements.  These leases have varying terms, the latest of which expires in 2065.2065.  As of December 31, 20162019, the potential amount of undiscounted payments we could be required to make in the event of non-payment by the primary lessee was approximately $550475 million.  The present value of these potential payments discounted at our pre-tax cost of debt at December 31, 20162019 was approximately $465400 million.  Our franchisees are the primary lessees under the vast majority of these leases.  We generally have cross-default provisions with these franchisees that would put them in default of their franchise agreement in the event of non-payment under the lease.  We believe these cross-default provisions significantly reduce the risk that we will be required to make payments under these leases.  Accordingly, the liability recorded for our probable exposure under such leases at December 31, 20162019 and December 26, 201531, 2018 was not material.



Franchise Loan Pool and Equipment Guarantees

We have agreed to provide financial support, if required, to a variable interest entity that operates a franchisee lending program used primarily to assist franchisees in the development of new restaurants or the upgrade of existing restaurants and, to a lesser extent, in connection with the Company’s refranchising programs in the U.S. We have determined that we are not required to consolidate this entity as we share the power to direct this entity’s lending activity with other parties. We have provided guarantees of 20% of the outstanding loans of the franchisee loan program. As such, at December 31, 2016 our guarantee exposure under this program is approximately $4 million based on total loans outstanding of $21 million.

In addition to the guarantees described above, YUM has agreed to provide guarantees of up to approximately $110 million on behalf of franchisees for several financing programs related to specific initiatives, primarily equipment purchases. At December 31, 2016, our guarantee exposure under these financing programs is approximately $6 million based on total loans outstanding of $10 million.

Insurance Programs

We are self-insured for a substantial portion of our current and prior years’ coverage including property and casualty losses.  To mitigate the cost of our exposures for certain property and casualty losses, we self-insure the risks of loss up to defined maximum per occurrence retentions on a line-by-line basis.  The Company then purchases insurance coverage, up to a certain limit, for losses that exceed the self-insurance per occurrence retention.  The insurers’ maximum aggregate loss limits are significantly above our actuarially determined probable losses; therefore, we believe the likelihood of losses exceeding the insurers’ maximum aggregate loss limits is remote.

The following table summarizes the 20162019 and 20152018 activity related to our net self-insured property and casualty reserves as of December 31, 20162019.

  Beginning Balance Expense Payments Ending Balance
2016 Activity $102
 42
 (46) $98
2015 Activity $116
 39
 (53) $102
  Beginning Balance Expense Payments Ending Balance
2019 Activity $66
 9
 (21) $54
2018 Activity $84
 11
 (29) $66


Due to the inherent volatility of actuarially determined property and casualty loss estimates, it is reasonably possible that we could experience changes in estimated losses which could be material to our growth in quarterly and annual Net Income.  We believe that we have recorded reserves for property and casualty losses at a level which has substantially mitigated the potential negative impact of adverse developments and/or volatility.

In the U.S. and in certain other countries, we are also self-insured for healthcare claims and long-term disability for eligible participating employees subject to certain deductibles and limitations.  We have accounted for our retained liabilities for property and casualty losses, healthcare and long-term disability claims, including reported and incurred but not reported claims, based on information provided by independent actuaries.

Legal Proceedings

We are subject to various claims and contingencies related to lawsuits, real estate, environmental and other matters arising in the normal course of business. An accrual is recorded with respect to claims or contingencies for which a loss is determined to be probable and reasonably estimable.

Yum! Restaurants India Private Limited (“YRIPL”), a Yum subsidiary in India, is the subject of a regulatory enforcement action in India (the “Action”). The CompanyAction alleges, among other things, that KFC International Holdings, Inc. and Taco BellPizza Hut International failed to satisfy certain conditions imposed by the Secretariat for Industrial Approval in 1993 and 1994 when those companies were named as defendantsgranted permission for foreign investment and operation in a number of putative class action suits filed in 2007, 2008, 2009India. The conditions at issue include an alleged minimum investment commitment and 2010 alleging violations of California labor laws including unpaid overtime, failure to timely pay wages on termination, failure to pay accrued vacation wages, failure to pay minimum wage, denial of meal and rest breaks, improper wage statements, unpaid business expenses, wrongful termination, discrimination, conversion and unfair or unlawful business practices in violation of California Business & Professions Code §17200. Some plaintiffs also sought penalties for alleged violations of California’s Labor Code under California’s Private Attorneys General Act (“PAGA”)store build requirements as well as statutory “waiting time” penaltieslimitations on the remittance of fees outside of India.

The Action originated with a complaint and alleged violationsshow cause notice filed in 2009 against YRIPL by the Deputy Director of California’s Unfair Business Practices Act. Plaintiffs sought to representthe Directorate of Enforcement (“DOE”) of the Indian Ministry of Finance following an income tax audit for the years 2002 and 2003. The matter was argued at hearing in 2015, but no order was issued. Following a California state-wide classchange in the incumbent official holding the position of hourly employees.Special Director of DOE (the “Special Director”), the matter resumed in 2018 and several additional hearings were conducted.

These matters were consolidated, and the consolidated case is styled In Re Taco Bell Wage and Hour Actions. The In Re Taco Bell Wage and Hour Actions plaintiffs filed a consolidated complaint in June 2009, and in March 2010 the court approved the


parties’ stipulation to dismiss the Company from the action, leaving Taco Bell as the sole defendant. Plaintiffs filed their motion for class certification on the vacation and final pay claims in December 2010, and on September 26, 2011, the court issued its order denying the certification of the vacation and final pay claims. Plaintiffs then sought to certify four separate meal and rest break classes. On January 2, 2013,29, 2020, the court rejected threeSpecial Director issued an order imposing a penalty on YRIPL and certain former directors of the proposed classes but granted certification with respectapproximately Indian Rupee 11 billion, or approximately $156 million. Of this amount, approximately $150 million relates to the late meal break class. The parties thereafter agreed onalleged failure to invest a listtotal of putative class members, and the class notice and opt out forms were mailed on January 21, 2014.

Per order of the court, plaintiffs filed a second amended complaint to clarify the class claims. Plaintiffs also filed a motion for partial summary judgment. Taco Bell filed motions to strike and to dismiss, as well as a motion to alter or amend the second amended complaint. On August 29, 2014, the court denied plaintiffs’ motion for partial summary judgment. On that same date, the court granted Taco Bell’s motion to dismiss all but one of the PAGA claims. On October 29, 2014, plaintiffs filed a motion to amend the operative complaint and a motion to amend the class certification order. On December 16, 2014, the court partially granted both motions, rejecting plaintiffs’ proposed on-duty meal period class but certifying a limited rest break class and certifying$80 million in India within an underpaid meal premium class, and allowing the plaintiffs to amend the complaint to reflect those certifications. On December 30, 2014, plaintiffs filed the third amended complaint. On February 26, 2015, the court denied a motioninitial seven year period. We have been advised by Taco Bell to dismiss or strike the underpaid meal premium class.

Beginning on February 22, 2016, the late meal period class claim, the limited rest break class claim, the underpaid meal premium class claim, and the associated statutory “waiting time” penalty claim was tried to a jury. On March 9, 2016, the jury returned verdicts in favor of Taco Bell on the late meal period claim, the limited rest break claim, and the statutory “waiting time” penalty claim. The jury found for the plaintiffs on the underpaid meal premium class claim, awarding approximately $0.5 million. A bench trial was subsequently conducted with respect to the PAGA claims and plaintiffs’ Business & Professions Code §17200 claim. On April 8, 2016, the court returned a verdict in favor of Taco Bell on the PAGA claims and the §17200 claim. In a separate ruling issued the same day, the court also ruled that plaintiffs were entitled to prejudgment interest on the underpaid meal premium class claim, awarding approximately $0.3 million. Taco Bell denies liability as to the underpaid meal premium class claim and filed a post-trial motion to overturn the verdict. Plaintiffs’ also filed various post-trial motions. On July 15, 2016, the court denied Taco Bell’s motion to overturn the verdict. The court denied Plaintiffs’ motions: (1) for a new trial, (2) for judgment as a matter of law to overturn the verdicts in favor of Taco Bell, (3) challenging the jury instructions and special verdict forms, and (4) to overturn the court’s rejection of the §17200 claims for meal and rest break violations. The court also denied Plaintiffs’ motions for additional costs and for enhanced awards to two of the named Plaintiffs. The court granted Plaintiffs’ motion for judgment on the §17200 claim regarding the underpaid meal premium claim, but rejected awarding any additional damages, findingexternal counsel that the jury verdict sufficiently compensatedorder is flawed and that several options for appeal exist. We deny liability and intend to continue vigorously defending this matter. We do not consider the class. The court granted Plaintiffs’ motion for attorneys’ fees, but awarded only approximately $1.1 millionrisk of the $7.3 million requested. The court also granted Plaintiffs’ bill of costs, but only awarded approximately $0.1 million of Plaintiffs’ $0.2 million. Thereafter, both Plaintiffs and Taco Bell timely filed notices of appeal and the matter is now before the Ninth Circuit. We have provided for a reasonable estimate of the possibleany significant loss relatingarising from this order to this lawsuit. However, in view of the inherent uncertainties of litigation, there can be no assurance that this lawsuit will not result in losses in excess of those currently provided for in our Consolidated Financial Statements.probable.

We are currently engaged in various other legal proceedings and have certain unresolved claims pending, the ultimate liability for which, if any, cannot be determined at this time. However, based upon consultation with legal counsel, we are of the opinion that such proceedings and claims are not expected to have a material adverse effect, individually or in the aggregate, on our Consolidated Financial Statements.





94



Note 21Note 20Selected Quarterly Financial Data (Unaudited)



 2016 2019
 
First
Quarter
 
Second
Quarter
 
Third
Quarter
 
Fourth
Quarter
 
 
Total
 
First
Quarter
 
Second
Quarter
 
Third
Quarter
 
Fourth
Quarter
 
 
Total
Revenues:                    
Company sales $887
 $996
 $993
 $1,324
 $4,200
 $333
 $359
 $364
 $490
 $1,546
Franchise and license fees and income 477
 481
 508
 700
 2,166
Franchise and property revenues 612
 633
 645
 770
 2,660
Franchise contributions for advertising and other services 309
 318
 330
 434
 1,391
Total revenues 1,364
 1,477
 1,501
 2,024
 6,366
 1,254
 1,310
 1,339
 1,694
 5,597
Restaurant profit 147
 165
 159
 231
 702
 61
 73
 72
 105
 311
Operating Profit(a)
 356
 408
 372
 489
 1,625
 433
 471
 480
 546
 1,930
Income from continuing operations, net of tax 240
 265
 204
 285
 994
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of tax 151
 74
 418
 (18) 625
Net Income 391
 339
 622
 267
 1,619
 262
 289
 255
 488
 1,294
Basic earnings per common share from continuing operations 0.58
 0.65
 0.52
 0.77
 2.52
Basic earnings(loss) per common share from discontinued operations 0.36
 0.17
 1.07
 (0.05) 1.59
Basic earnings per common share 0.94
 0.82
 1.59
 0.72
 4.11
 0.85
 0.94
 0.83
 1.61
 4.23
Diluted earnings per common share from continuing operations 0.57
 0.64
 0.51
 0.76
 2.48
Diluted earnings (loss) per common share from discontinued operations 0.36
 0.17
 1.05
 (0.05) 1.56
Diluted earnings per common share 0.93
 0.81
 1.56
 0.71
 4.04
 0.83
 0.92
 0.81
 1.58
 4.14
Dividends declared per common share 0.46
 0.46
 
 0.81
 1.73
 0.42
 0.42
 0.42
 0.42
 1.68
  2015
  
First
Quarter
 
Second
Quarter
 
Third
Quarter
 
Fourth
Quarter
 
 
Total
Revenues:          
Company sales $944
 $1,051
 $1,033
 $1,328
 $4,356
Franchise and license fees and income 467
 475
 494
 648
 2,084
Total revenues 1,411
 1,526
 1,527
 1,976
 6,440
Restaurant profit 149
 177
 160
 223
 709
Operating Profit(b)
 355
 279
 339
 429
 1,402
Income from continuing operations, net of tax 246
 169
 231
 290
 936
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of tax 116
 66
 190
 (15) 357
Net Income 362
 235
 421
 275
 1,293
Basic earnings per common share from continuing operations 0.56
 0.39
 0.53
 0.67
 2.15
Basic earnings (loss) per common share from discontinued operations 0.27
 0.15
 0.44
 (0.03) 0.82
Basic earnings per common share 0.83
 0.54
 0.97
 0.64
 2.97
Diluted earnings per common share from continuing operations 0.55
 0.38
 0.52
 0.66
 2.11
Diluted earnings (loss) per common share from discontinued operations 0.26
 0.15
 0.43
 (0.03) 0.81
Diluted earnings per common share 0.81
 0.53
 0.95
 0.63
 2.92
Dividends declared per common share 
 0.82
 
 0.92
 1.74


  2018
  
First
Quarter
 
Second
Quarter
 
Third
Quarter
 
Fourth
Quarter
 
 
Total
Revenues:          
Company sales $512
 $512
 $499
 $477
 $2,000
Franchise and property revenues 584
 584
 605
 709
 2,482
Franchise contributions for advertising and other services 275
 272
 287
 372
 1,206
Total revenues 1,371
 1,368
 1,391
 1,558
 5,688
Restaurant profit 74
 91
 100
 101
 366
Operating Profit(b)
 553
 449
 553
 741
 2,296
Net Income 433
 321
 454
 334
 1,542
Basic earnings per common share 1.30
 0.99
 1.43
 1.07
 4.80
Diluted earnings per common share 1.27
 0.97
 1.40
 1.04
 4.69
Dividends declared per common share 0.36
 0.36
 0.36
 0.36
 1.44

(a)Includes net gains from refranchising initiatives of $3$6 million, $53$4 million, $21$8 million and $64$19 million in the first, second, third and fourth quarters, respectively, costs associated with YUM’s Strategic Transformation Initiatives of $5 million, $27 million and $39 million in the second, third and fourth quarters, respectively, a non-cash charge associated with the modification of EID share-based compensation awards in connection with the Separation of $30 million in the fourth quarter, costs associated with KFC U.S. Acceleration Agreement of $9 million, $8 million and $9 million in the first, second and fourth quarters, respectively, and charges incurred as a result of settlement payments of deferred vested pension balances in the Plan of $1 million and $24 million in the third and fourth quarters, respectively. See Note 5.

(b)Includes net gains from refranchising initiatives of $7$156 million, $29 million, $100 million and $49 million in the first and fourth quarters, respectively, and net losses from refranchising initiatives of $72 million and $4 million in the second and third quarters, respectively. Also includes costs associated with KFC U.S. Acceleration Agreement of $2 million, $8 million, $21 million and $41$255 million in the first, second, third and fourth quarters, respectively. See Note 5.


Note 21Subsequent Event

On January 6, 2020, we announced our definitive agreement pursuant to which the Company will acquire all of the issued and outstanding common shares of The Habit Restaurants, Inc. (“Habit”) for $14 per share in cash or a total of approximately $375 million. The transaction is subject to approval by Habit’s stockholders and other customary closing conditions. The transaction is expected to be completed by the end of the first-quarter of 2020.

Additionally, if the transaction is consummated, Habit will make payment to certain of its former shareholders pursuant to an existing Tax Receivable Agreement in the aggregate amount of approximately $53 million.  The amount of this payment in excess of Habit’s cash necessary at closing for normal working capital purposes, in addition to customary transaction fees and expenses, will be liabilities funded by the Company.

We intend to fund all amounts for the acquisition of Habit using cash on hand and available borrowing capacity under our Revolving Facility.



Item 9.
Changes In and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure.

None.

Item 9A.Controls and Procedures.

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

The Company has evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of its disclosure controls and procedures pursuant to Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 as of the end of the period covered by this report.  Based on the evaluation, performed under the supervision and with the participation of the Company’s management, including the Chief Executive Officer (the “CEO”) and the Chief Financial Officer (the “CFO”), the Company’s management, including the CEO and CFO, concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of the end of the period covered by this report.

Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting, as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(f) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.  Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, we conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting based on the framework in Internal Control – Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Based on our evaluation under the framework in Internal Control – Integrated Framework (2013), our management concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was effective as of December 31, 20162019.

KPMG LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, has audited the Consolidated Financial Statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K and the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting and has issued their report, included herein.

Changes in Internal Control

There were no changes with respect to the Company’s internal control over financial reporting or in other factors that materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, internal control over financial reporting during the quarter ended December 31, 20162019.

Item 9B.Other Information.

None.

96



PART III

Item 10.Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance.

Information regarding Section 16(a) compliance, the Audit Committee and the Audit Committee financial expert, the Company’s code of ethics and background of the directors appearing under the captions “Stock Ownership Information,” “Governance of the Company,” “Executive Compensation” and “Item 1:  Election of Directors and Director biographies” is incorporated by reference from the Company’s definitive proxy statement which will be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission no later than 120 days after December 31, 20162019.

Information regarding executive officers of the Company is included in Part I.



Item 11.Executive Compensation.

Information regarding executive and director compensation and the CompensationManagement Planning and Development Committee appearing under the captions “Governance of the Company” and “Executive Compensation” is incorporated by reference from the Company’s definitive proxy statement which will be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission no later than 120 days after December 31, 20162019.

Item 12.Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters.

Information regarding equity compensation plans and security ownership of certain beneficial owners and management appearing under the captions “Executive Compensation” and “Stock Ownership Information” is incorporated by reference from the Company’s definitive proxy statement which will be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission no later than 120 days after December 31, 20162019.

Item 13.Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence.

Information regarding certain relationships and related transactions and information regarding director independence appearing under the caption “Governance of the Company” is incorporated by reference from the Company’s definitive proxy statement which will be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission no later than 120 days after December 31, 20162019.

Item 14.Principal Accountant Fees and Services.

Information regarding principal accountant fees and services and audit committee pre-approval policies and procedures appearing under the caption “Item 2:  Ratification of Independent Auditors” is incorporated by reference from the Company’s definitive proxy statement which will be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission no later than 120 days after December 31, 20162019.

97



PART IV




Item 15.Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules.

(a)(1) Financial Statements:  Consolidated Financial Statements filed as part of this report are listed under Part II, Item 8 of this Form 10-K.
    
 (2) Financial Statement Schedules:  No schedules are required because either the required information is not present or not present in amounts sufficient to require submission of the schedule, or because the information required is included in the Consolidated Financial Statements thereto filed as a part of this Form 10-K.
    
 (3) Exhibits:  The exhibits listed in the accompanying Exhibit Index are filed as part of this Form 10-K. The Index to Exhibits specifically identifies each management contract or compensatory plan required to be filed as an exhibit to this Form 10-K.


98



 SIGNATURES


Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this Form 10-K annual report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

Date:February 21, 201719, 2020

 YUM! BRANDS, INC.



By:/s/ Greg CreedDavid W. Gibbs




Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this annual report has been signed belowon February 19, 2020 by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

 
Signature Title Date
/s/ Greg CreedChief Executive OfficerFebruary 21, 2017
Greg Creed(principal executive officer)
    
/s/ David W. Gibbs President and Chief Executive Officer
David W. Gibbs(principal executive officer)
/s/ Chris TurnerChief Financial Officer February 21, 2017
David GibbsChris Turner (principal financial officer) 
    
/s/ David E. Russell Senior Vice President, Finance and Corporate Controller February 21, 2017
David E. Russell (principal accounting officer) 
    
/s/ Paget L. Alves Director February 21, 2017
Paget L. Alves   
 
/s/ Keith BarrDirector
Keith Barr
    
/s/ Michael J. Cavanagh Director February 21, 2017
Michael J. Cavanagh   
    
/s/ Brian CornellChristopher M. Connor Director February 21, 2017
Brian CornellChristopher M. Connor   
    
/s/ David W. DormanBrian C. Cornell Director February 21, 2017
David W. DormanBrian C. Cornell   
    
/s/ Mirian Graddick-WeirGreg Creed Director 
February 21, 2017Greg Creed
Mirian Graddick-Weir    
/s/ Tanya L. DomierDirector
Tanya L. Domier
/s/ Mirian M. Graddick-WeirDirector
Mirian M. Graddick-Weir
    
/s/ Thomas C. Nelson Director February 21, 2017
Thomas C. Nelson   
/s/ Thomas M. RyanDirectorFebruary 21, 2017
Thomas M. Ryan
    
/s/ P. Justin Skala Director February 21, 2017
P. Justin Skala   
    
/s/ Elane B. Stock Director February 21, 2017
Elane B. Stock   
    
/s/ Robert D. Walter Director February 21, 2017
Robert D. Walter   
/s/ Annie Young-ScrivnerDirector
Annie Young-Scrivner 


100


YUM!Yum! Brands, Inc.
Exhibit Index
(Item 15)

Exhibit
Number
 Description of Exhibits
   
2.1 * 
   
3.1 
   
3.2 
   
4.1 
    
  (i)6.25%
(ii)
   
  (ii)(iii)6.875%
(iv)
(v)
(iii)5.30% Senior Notes due September 15, 2019 issued under the foregoing May 1, 1998 indenture, which notes are incorporated by reference from(included in Exhibit 4.1 to YUM's Report on Form 8-K filed on August 25, 2009.
(iv)3.875% Senior Notes due November 1, 2020 issued under the foregoing May 1, 1998 indenture, which notes are incorporated by reference from Exhibit 4.2 to YUM's Report on Form 8-K filed on August 31, 2010.
(v)3.750% Senior Notes due November 1, 2021 issued under the foregoing May 1, 1998 indenture, which notes are incorporated by reference from Exhibit 4.2 to YUM's Report on Form 8-K filed August 29, 2011.
(vi)3.875% Senior Notes due November 1, 2023 issued under the foregoing May 1, 1998 indenture, which notes are incorporated by reference from Exhibit 4.24.1) to YUM's Report on Form 8-K filed October 31, 2013.
    
4.2
  (vii)5.350% Senior Notes due November 1, 2043 issued
herewith.

   

10.1

Exhibit
Number
Description of Exhibits
10.1.1
10.1.2
10.1.3
   
10.2† 
   
10.2.1† 
   
10.3† 
   
10.4† 
   
10.4.1† 
   
10.5† 
   
10.5.1† YUM!
10.5.2†YUM! Brands Pension Equalization Plan Amendment, as effective January 1, 2012, which is incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.7.2 to Yum’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 23, 2013.
10.5.3†YUM! Brands Pension Equalization Plan Amendment, as effective January 1, 2013, which is incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.7.3 to Yum’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 23, 2013.December 31, 2018.
   
10.6† 
   
10.7† 
   
10.8† 
   

Exhibit
Number
Description of Exhibits
10.9† 
   
10.10† 
   
10.11† 
   
10.11.1† 
   
10.11.2† 
10.11.3†
   
10.12† YUM!
   
10.13† 
    
10.13.1† 
  
10.13.2† 
 
10.13.3†
10.13.4†
    
10.14† 
10.14.1† 
   
10.15† 1999 Long Term Incentive Plan Award (Restricted Stock Unit Agreement) by and between the Company and David C. Novak, dated as of January 24, 2008, which is incorporated herein by reference from Exhibit 10.33 to YUM's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 29, 2007.
10.16†
   
10.17†10.16† 
   
10.18†10.17† 

   
10.19†10.18† 1999 Long Term Incentive Plan Award (Restricted Stock Unit Agreement) by and between the Company and Jing-Shyh S. Su, dated as of May 20, 2010, which is incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.27 to YUM's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 25, 2010.
10.20†

Exhibit
Number
 Description of Exhibits
10.21†10.19† YUM!
   
10.22†10.20 Retirement Agreement and General Release, dated August 13, 2015, by and between the Company and Jing-Shyh S. Su, which is incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.29 to YUM's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 5, 2015.
10.23†Letter of Understanding dated December 7, 2015 by and between the Company and Patrick J. Grismer, which is incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.30 to YUM's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015.
10.24†Letter of Understanding dated June 6, 2016 by and between the Company and David C. Novak, which is incorporated herein by reference from Exhibit 10.31 to YUM's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 11, 2016.
10.25
   
10.2610.21 
10.22
   
10.2710.22.1 
   
10.2810.22.2 
10.22.3
10.22.4
10.23
   
10.2910.24 
   
10.3010.24.1 
10.24.2
10.25

10.26
   

10.31
Exhibit
Number
 Description of Exhibits
10.27
   
12.110.28† Computation of ratio of earnings
YUM’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2019.

10.29†
   
21.1 
   
23.1 
   
31.1 
   
31.2 
   
32.1 
   
32.2 
   
101.INS Instance Document - the instance document does not appear in the Interactive Data File because its XBRL tags are embedded within the Inline XBRL document
   
101.SCH XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document
   
101.CAL XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document
101.LAB XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document
   
101.PRE XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document
   
101.DEF XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document
   
*Certain schedules and exhibits to this agreement have been omitted in accordance with Item 601(b)(2) of Regulation S-K. A copy of any omitted schedules and/or exhibits will be furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission upon request.
  
104
Cover Page Interactive Data File (formatted as Inline XBRL and contained in Exhibit 101)

     
Indicates a management contract or compensatory plan.



105113