QuickLinks -- Click here to rapidly navigate through this document

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549


FORM 10-K


ý

ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2003

OR

o

TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period fromto

ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2002
COMMISSION FILE NO. 1-10308


CENDANT CORPORATION
(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)

DELAWARE
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
 06-0918165
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification Number)

9 WEST 57TH STREET
NEW YORK, NY
10019

(Address of principal executive office)

 


10019

(Zip Code)
212-413-1800

(Registrant's telephone number, including area code)


SECURITIES REGISTERED PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(b) OF THE ACT:


TITLE OF EACH CLASS


 

NAME OF EACH EXCHANGE
ON WHICH REGISTERED

CD Common Stock, Par Value $.01
Upper DECS(sm)
 New York Stock Exchange
Upper DECS (sm)
New York Stock Exchange
SECURITIES REGISTERED PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(g) OF THE ACT:

None

SECURITIES REGISTERED PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(g) OF THE ACT:

None


Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days: Yes /x/ý          No / /o

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of Registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. / /ý

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act Rule 12b-2)Act): Yes /x/ý          No / /o

The aggregate market value of the Common Stock issued and outstanding andRegistrant's common stock held by nonaffiliates of the Registrant based upon the closing price for the Common Stock on the New York Stock Exchange on June 28, 200230, 2003 was $16,371,796,533.$18,409,344,533.20. All executive officers and directors of the registrant have been deemed, solely for the purpose of the foregoing calculation, to be "affiliates" of the registrant.

The number of shares outstanding of the Registrant's common stock was 1,030,114,5421,007,659,616 as of January 31, 2003.2004.


DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

Portions of the registrant's definitive proxy statement to be mailed to stockholders in connection with our annual stockholders meeting held on MayApril 20, 20032004 (the "Annual Proxy Statement") are incorporated by reference into Part III hereof.


DOCUMENT CONSTITUTING PART OF SECTION 10(A) PROSPECTUS
FOR FORM S-8 REGISTRATION STATEMENTS

This document constitutes part of a prospectus covering securities that have been registered under the Securities Act of 1933.





TABLE OF CONTENTS

Item

 Description
 Page
 Description
 Page


 

PART I

 

 
 PART I  
1 Business 5 Business 3
2 Properties 35 Properties 36
3 Legal Proceedings 37 Legal Proceedings 38
4 Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders 39 Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders 40


 

PART II

 

 

 

PART II

 

 
5 Market for the Registrant's Common Equity and Related Stockholder Matters 40 Market for the Registrant's Common Equity and Related Stockholders Matters 41
6 Selected Financial Data 41 Selected Financial Data 42
7 Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations 42 Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations 44
7a Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk 78
7A Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk 70
8 Financial Statements and Supplementary Data 79 Financial Statements and Supplementary Data 71
9 Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure 79 Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure 71
9A Controls and Procedures 72


 

PART III

 

 

 

PART III

 

 
10 Directors and Executive Officers of the Registrant 79 Directors and Executive Officers of the Registrant 72
11 Executive Compensation 79 Executive Compensation 72
12 Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management 79 Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management 72
13 Certain Relationships and Related Transactions 79 Certain Relationships and Related Transactions 75
14 Controls and Procedures 79 Principal Accounting Fees and Services 75


 

PART IV

 

 

 

PART IV

 

 
15 Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules and Reports on Form 8-K 80 Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules and Reports on Form 8-K 75


 

Signatures

 

 

 

Signatures

 

 
 Certifications  

2i



FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

Forward-looking statements in our public filings or other public statements are subject to known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors which may cause our actual results, performance or achievements to be materially different from any future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements were based on various factors and were derived utilizing numerous important assumptions and other important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those in the forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements include the information concerning our future financial performance, business strategy, projected plans and objectives. Statements preceded by, followed by or that otherwise include the words "believes", "expects", "anticipates", "intends", "projects", "estimates", "plans", "may increase", "may fluctuate" and similar expressions or future or conditional verbs such as "will", "should", "would", "may" and "could" are generally forward-looking in nature and not historical facts. You should understand that the following important factors and assumptions could affect our future results and could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed in such forward-looking statements:

1


3


Other factors and assumptions not identified above were also involved in the derivation of these forward-looking statements, and the failure of such other assumptions to be realized as well as other factors may also cause actual results to differ materially from those projected. Most of these factors are difficult to predict accurately and are generally beyond our control.

You should consider the areas of risk described above in connection with any forward-looking statements that may be made by us and our businesses generally. Except for our ongoing obligations to disclose material information under the federal securities laws, we undertake no obligation to release publicly any revisions to any forward-looking statements, to report events or to report the occurrence of unanticipated events unless required by law. For any forward-looking statements contained in any document, we claim the protection of the safe harbor for forward-looking statements contained in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995.

42



PART I

ITEM 1.    BUSINESS

Except as expressly indicated or unless the context otherwise requires, the "Company", "Cendant", "we", "our" or "us" means Cendant Corporation, a Delaware corporation, and its subsidiaries.

We are one of the foremost providers of travel and real estate services in the world. Our businesses provide a wide range of consumer and business services primarily in the travel and real estate services industries, which are intended to complement one another and create cross-marketing opportunities both within and among our following five business segments:


* * *

We focus on organic growth and from time to time may augment such growth through the select acquisition of (or possible joint venture with) complementary businesses primarily in the real estate and travel services industries. We expect to fund the purchase price of any such acquisition with cash on hand or borrowings under our credit lines. No assurance can be given with respect to the timing, likelihood or business effect of any possible transaction. In addition, we continually review and evaluate our portfolio of existing businesses to determine if they continue to meet our business objectives. As part of our ongoing

3



evaluation of such businesses, we intend from time to time to explore and conduct discussions with regard to joint ventures, divestitures and related corporate transactions. However, we can give no assurance with respect to the magnitude, timing, likelihood or financial or business effect of any possible transaction. We also cannot predict whether any divestitures or other transactions will be consummated or, if consummated, will result in a financial or other benefit to us.

5



We intend to use a portion of the proceeds from any such dispositions and cash from operations to retire indebtedness, repurchase our common stock, make acquisitions and for other general corporate purposes.

This 10-K Report includes certain "forward-looking statements" within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These statements are based on management's current expectations and are subject to uncertainty and changes in circumstances. Actual results may differ materially from these expectations due to changes in global economic, business, competitive, market and regulatory factors. Please refer to "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Results of Operations" for additional factors and assumptions that could cause actual results to differ from the forward-looking statements contained in this 10-K Report.

We were created through thea merger ofwith HFS Incorporated into CUC International, Inc. in December 1997 with the resultant corporation being renamed Cendant Corporation. Our principal executive office is located at 9 West 57th Street, New York, New York 10019 (telephone number: (212) 413-1800). We are subject to the informational requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and in accordance therewith, we file reports, proxy and information statements and other information with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Commission") and certain of our officers and directors file statements of changechanges in beneficial ownership on Form 4 with the Commission. Such reports, proxy statements and other information and such Form 4s can be accessed on our Webweb site atwww.cendant.com. A copy of our CodeCodes of Conduct and Ethics, as defined under Item 406 of Regulation S-K, including any amendments thereto or waivers thereof, Corporate Governance Guidelines, Director Independence Criteria and Board Committee Charters can also be accessed on our Webweb site. We will provide, at no cost, a copy of our CodeCodes of Conduct and Ethics, Corporate Governance Guidelines and Board Committee Charters upon request by phone or in writing at the above phone number or address, attention: Investor Relations.

SEGMENTS

REAL ESTATE SERVICES SEGMENT (33%(37%, 22%33% and 34%22% of revenue for 2003, 2002 2001 and 2000,2001, respectively)

Real Estate Franchise Business (5%(4%, 7%5% and 14%7% of revenue for 2003, 2002 2001 and 2000,2001, respectively)

Our Real Estate Franchise GroupBusiness is the world's largest real estate brokerage franchisor and was involved in approximately one in four single-family homes boughthome purchase or soldsale transactions in the United States in 2002.2003. We franchise real estate brokerage businesses under the following franchise systems:

Through NRT, we own and operate approximately 920 of the Coldwell Banker, ERA and Coldwell Banker Commercial offices referred to above. NRT pays intercompany royalty and marketing fees to our Real Estate Franchise Business in connection with its operation of these offices.

Royalty and marketing fees on commissions from real estate transactions compriseare the primary component of revenue for our real estateReal Estate Franchise Business. Our franchise business.contracts generally have a term of ten years. We also offer service providers an opportunity to market their products to our brokers through our

4



Preferred Alliancesm program. Program. To participate in this program, service providers generally pay us an up-front fee, commissions or both.

Through NRT,On February 17, 2004, we ownobtained the rights to create a Sotheby's International Realty franchise system pursuant to a license agreement with Sotheby's Holdings, Inc. Such license agreement has a 100-year term, which consists of an initial 50-year term and operate approximately 950a 50-year renewal option, whereby we will pay a licensing fee to Sotheby's Holdings for the use of the Coldwell Banker, ERA and Coldwell Banker Commercial offices referred to above. NRT pays royalty and marketing fees toSotheby's International Realty name. In connection with such transaction, we also acquired the domestic residential real estate brokerage operations of Sotheby's. The franchise system will be operated by our Real Estate Franchise Group in connection with its operation of these offices.Business and the company-owned residential real estate brokerage operations will be operated by NRT Incorporated.

6



Each of our brands has a consumer Webweb site that offers real estate listings, contacts and services. century21.com, coldwellbanker.com, coldwellbankercommercial.com, sothebysrealty.com and era.com are the official Webweb sites for the CENTURY 21, Coldwell Banker, Coldwell Banker Commercial, Sotheby's International Realty and ERA real estate franchise systems, respectively. In addition, all of the aggregated listings of our CENTURY 21, Coldwell Banker and ERA national real estate franchisesbrands are available through the Realtor.com Webweb site.

Growth.    We marketOur primary objectives are to sell new franchises, renew existing franchises and, most importantly, provide world-class service and support to our franchisee real estate brokerage franchises primarilybrokers in a way that enables them to independent, unaffiliated ownersincrease their profitability. We support our franchisees with dedicated national marketing programs, technology, training and education.

Our strategies for growth include the continued expansion of our franchise systems through additional franchise sales; facilitating mergers and acquisitions by our franchisees; recruitment of real estate brokerage companies as well as individuals who are interested in establishingagents; additional revenue generation through referrals to our other real estate brokerage businesses. We believe thatestate-related businesses and our existing franchisee base represents another source of potential growth, as franchisees seek to expand their existing business geographically. Therefore, our sales strategy focuses on maintaining the satisfaction of our franchisees by providing services such as training, ongoing support, volume discountsPreferred Alliance program; and increasing brand awareness by providing each brand with a dedicated marketing staff. Our real estate brokerage franchise systems employ a national franchise sales force, compensated primarily by commissions on sales, consisting of approximately 100 sales personnel.international expansion.

Competition.Competition among the national real estate brokerage brand franchisors to grow their franchise systems is intense. Our largest national competitors in this industry include the Prudential, GMAC Real Estate and RE/MAX real estate brokerage brands. In addition, a real estate broker may choose to affiliate with a regional chain or choose not to affiliate with a franchisor but to remain independent. We believe that competition for the sale of franchises in the real estate brokerage industry is based principally upon the perceived value and quality of the brand and services offered to franchisees.

The ability of our real estate brokerage franchisees to compete in thethis industry is important to our prospects for growth. The ability of an individual franchisee to compete may be affected by the location and real estate agent service quality of its office, the number of competing offices in the vicinity, its affiliation with a recognized brand name, community reputation and other factors. A franchisee's success may also be affected by general, regional and local economic conditions. The potential negative effect of these conditions on our results of operations is generally reduced by virtue of the diverse geographical locations of our franchisees. At December 31, 2002, the2003, our combined real estate franchise systems had approximately 8,200 franchised brokerage offices in the United States and approximately 12,60012,700 offices worldwide. The real estate franchise systems have offices in 5762 countries and territories in North and South America, Europe, Asia, Africa and Australia.

Real Estate Brokerage Business    (20%(22% and 20% of revenue for 2002)

On April 17,2003 and 2002, we acquired the common stock of NRT Incorporated. NRT was originally organized as a joint venture between us and Apollo Management, L.P. Apollo owned 100% of the common stock of NRT and we owned all of NRT's preferred stock, a portion of which was convertible into an equal equity ownership with Apollo. The purchase price was approximately $230 million which we satisfied by delivering 11.5 million shares of CD common stock. We also repaid approximately $320 million of NRT's debt. Prior to our acquisition of the NRT common stock, NRT was the largest real estate franchisee in our brokerage system based on gross commission income and represented approximately 43% of the Real Estate Franchise Group revenue for 2002. NRT will continue to pay royalty and marketing fees to our Real Estate Franchise Group and such fees are not reflected in the percentage of revenue set forth above. Subsequent to our acquisition of NRT, NRT acquired 20 other real estate brokerage operations for approximately $399 million, including Clearwater, Florida-based Arvida Realty Services for approximately $160 million in cash and The DeWolfe Companies, Inc., based in New England, for approximately $146 million in cash. NRT converts acquired real estate brokerages to either Coldwell Banker or ERA brand names and integrates their operations as soon as practical after acquisition.respectively)

As a result of our acquisition of NRT in 2002, we now operate the largest residential real estate brokerage firm in the United States based on sales volume.States. We operateoffer assistance with the sale and purchase of properties through approximately 950985 full service real estate brokerage offices nationwide under the COLDWELL BANKERColdwell Banker, ERA, Corcoran Group and ERASotheby's International Realty (as of February 17, 2004) brand names offering assistance with the sale and purchase of properties. Asnames. In addition, as a full service real estate brokerage offering one-stop shopping to consumers, we promote the services of Cendant Mortgage, Cendant Mobility, and Cendant Settlement Services Group.Businesses.

75



SalesOur Real Estate Brokerage Business derives revenue from sales commissions, which we generally receive at the closing of real estate transactions,transactions. Sales commissions usually range from approximately 5% to 7% of the sales price. In transactions in which we act as broker on one side of a transaction (either the buying side or the selling side) and a third-party is acting as broker on the other side of the transaction, we typically must share half of the sales commission with the other broker 50% of the sales commission.broker. Sales associates generally receive between 60%50% and 80% of such commissions. NRT pays intercompany royalty and marketing fees to our Real Estate Franchise Business and such fees are not reflected in the percentage of revenue set forth above. During 2003, NRT represented approximately 38% of our Real Estate Franchise Business revenue.

Growth.    In addition to organic growth, ourOur strategy is to grow both organically and through the acquisition of independent real estate brokerages. In 2003, we acquired 19 brokerages, none of which was material to Cendant. To grow organically, we seek to recruit and thenretain sales associates, continue to provide exceptional service in existing markets, and enter new markets. When we acquire a real estate brokerage, we typically convert themit to one of our existing real estate franchise brands.brands, Coldwell Banker, Corcoran or ERA. We believe that approximately 80% of real estate brokerages are currently independent.

Competition.The residential real estate brokerage industry is highly competitive, particularly in the densely populated metropolitan areas in which NRT operates. In addition, the industry has relatively low barriers to entry for new participants, including participants pursuing non-traditional methods of marketing real estate, such as internet-based listing services. Companies compete for sales and marketing business primarily on the basis of services offered, reputation, personal contacts, and to a lesser extent, brokerage commissions. NRT competes primarily with franchisees of local and regional real estate franchisors; franchisees of our brands and of other national real estate franchisors, such as the RE/MAX, GMAC Real Estate and Prudential real estate brokerage brands; regional independent real estate organizations, such as Weichert, Realtors and Long & Foster Real Estate; discount brokerages, such as Foxtons; web sites such as Lendingtree.com, and smaller niche companies competing in local areas.

Mortgage Business (3%(6%, 9%3% and 10%9% of revenue for 2003, 2002 2001 and 2000,2001, respectively)

Cendant Mortgagesm is a centralized mortgage lender conducting business in all 50 states. We focus on retail mortgage originations in which we issue mortgages directly to consumers (including through our private label channel) as opposed to purchasing closed loans from third parties. Our originations are derived fromWe originate mortgage loans through three principal business channels: real estate brokers, financial institutions or "private label" and relocation. In the real estate brokerage channel, we originate, sell and service residential first and second mortgage loans in the United States through Cendant Mortgage, Corporation, Century 21 Mortgage®,Mortgage, Coldwell Banker Mortgage and ERA Mortgage. Through thisThis channel we originatedgenerated approximately 31%26% of our mortgages in 2002.2003. We are a leading provider of private label mortgage originations where a financial institution outsources its mortgage origination functions to us. Our financial institutions, or "private label" channel, which includes outsourcing arrangements with Merrill Lynch Credit Corporation and marketing arrangements with American Express CenturionMembership Bank, among others, generated approximately 65%71% of our mortgages in 2002. We believe that we are the largest provider of private label mortgage originations.2003. The relocation channel offers mortgages to employees being relocated through Cendant Mobility and generated 4%3% of our originationsmortgages in 2002.2003. We receive fees in connection withgenerate revenue through our loan originations, private label services, mortgage sales and mortgage servicing.

For 2002,As of September 30, 2003, Cendant Mortgage was the fourth largesta top four retail originator of residential purchase lender of retail originated residential mortgages, the sixth largest retail lenderoriginator of residential mortgages (including refinance and purchase) and the tenth largest overall residential mortgage originator in the United States and the ninth largest overallStates. Our purchase mortgage originator.volume has grown from approximately $1 billion in 1990 to approximately $35 billion in 2003. Our total mortgage volume for 2003 was $83.7 billion.

We marketderive our mortgage products through:mortgages through the following methods:

6


Our teleservices operation, the Phone In, Move In program, was developed in 1997 and has been established nationwide. Our teleservices operation, together with our web interface, which contains educational materials, rate quotes and a mortgage banks after underwriting the loans, which typically accountsapplication, accounted for approximately 15%68% of our originations.originations in 2003. Our field sales professionals accounted for approximately 19% of our originations in 2003, and while not a primary focus of our business, the purchase of closed loans accounted for approximately 13% of our mortgage volume in 2003.

The following table sets forth the composition of our mortgage loan originations by product type for each of the years ended December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001.

 
 2003
 2002
 2001
 
Fixed rate 62.8%55.9%75.0%
Adjustable rate 37.2%44.1%25.0%
  
 
 
 
Total 100.0%100.0%100.0%
  
 
 
 

Conforming(*)

 

69.1

%

63.1

%

77.5

%
Non-conforming 30.9%36.9%22.5%
  
 
 
 
Total 100.0%100.0%100.0%
  
 
 
 

(*)
Such percentage of mortgages that we typically have available for resale that conform to the standards of Fannie Mae Corp., the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation and the Government National Mortgage Association.

8


Cendant Mortgage customarily sells all mortgages it originates to investors (which include a variety of institutional investors) generally within an average of 30-60 days, either60 days. Loans are typically sold as individual loans, mortgage-backed securities or participation certificates issued or guaranteed by Fannie Mae Corp., the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation or the Government National Mortgage Association. Approximately 85% ofWe generally retain the mortgages thatmortgage servicing rights on loans we typically have available for resale conform to the standards of Fannie Mae Corp., the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation and the Government National Mortgage Association.sell. Cendant Mortgage earns revenue from the sale of the mortgage loans to investors, as well as on the servicing of the loans for investors. Mortgage servicing consists of collecting loan payments, remitting principal and interest payments to investors, holdingmanaging escrow funds for payment of mortgage related expenses such as taxes and insurance, and administering our mortgage loan servicing portfolio.

7



The following table sets forth summary data of our mortgage servicing activities as of December 31:

 
 2003(a)
 2002(a)
 2001(a)
 
Outstanding loans serviced ($ millions) $136,427 $114,079 $97,205 
Number of loans (units)  888,860  786,201  717,251 
Average loan size $153,485 $145,102 $135,525 
Weighted average interest rate (%)  5.36% 6.17% 6.91%

Delinquent Mortgage Loans(b):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
 30 days  1.7% 2.0% 2.3%
 60 days  0.3% 0.4% 0.5%
 90 days or more  0.4% 0.4% 0.4%
  
 
 
 
  Total delinquencies  2.4% 2.8% 3.2%
  
 
 
 

Foreclosures/Bankruptcies

 

 

0.7

%

 

0.7

%

 

0.7

%

Major Geographical Concentrations(b):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
 California  10.9% 11.8% 11.9%
 New Jersey  9.4% 7.4% 6.9%
 New York  7.9% 6.4% 5.9%
 Florida  7.1% 7.2% 6.7%
 Texas  5.6% 6.1% 6.1%

(a)
Does not include home equity mortgages serviced by us.
(b)
As a percentage of unpaid principal balance of outstanding loans.

Growth.Our strategy is to increase sales by expanding all of our sources of business with emphasis on our private label program and purchase mortgage volume through our teleservices and Internet programs. Purchase mortgage volume has grown from approximately $1 billion in 1990 to approximately $28.5 billion in 2002. The Phone In, Move In program was developed in 1997 and has been established nationwide. We also expect to expand our volume of mortgage originations resulting from corporate employee relocations through increased linkage with Cendant Mobility and increasing our marketing programs within NRT and our real estate brokerage franchise systems. Each of these growth opportunities is driven by our low cost teleservices platform. The competitive advantage of using a centralized, efficient and high quality teleservices platform allows us to more cost effectively capture a greater percentage of the highly fragmented mortgage marketplace.

Competition.Competition is based on service, quality, products and price. Cendant Mortgage has increased itsMortgage's share of retail mortgage originations in the United States to 5% in 2002 from 4.4% in 2001.was 5.1% as of September 30, 2003. The mortgage industry is highly fragmented and, according toInside Mortgage Finance, the industry leader, for 2002at September 30, 2003, reported approximately a 16%19% share in the United States. Competitive conditions can also be impacted by shifts in consumer preference for variable rate mortgages from fixed rate mortgages, depending upon the current interest rate market.

Settlement Services Business    (2%(3%, 2% and 1% of revenue for 2003, 2002 and 2001, respectively)

Our Cendant Settlement Services GroupBusiness provides settlement services for both residential and commercial real estate transactions, including title andinsurance, appraisal review and closing services throughout the United States. More specifically:

8


We derive revenue for this business through fees charged in real estate transactions for rendering the services described above. We provide many of these services in connection with our residential and commercial real estate brokerage, mortgage and relocation operations.

Growth.    Our Settlement Services Business intendsWe intend to grow our settlement services business through leveragingcontinued realization of the cross-selling opportunities presented by our other residential real estate, businesses, including through our owned brokerage operations. Welodging and timeshare businesses. Additionally, we plan to continue to focus on cross-selling opportunities as well as through expandedexpand our product offering and geographic coverage to capture additional business.

9



Competition.The settlement services business is highly competitive and fragmented. The number and size of competing companies vary in the different areas in which we conduct business. Generally, in metropolitan and suburban localities, we compete with other title insurers, title agents and other vendor management companies. Our largestWhile we are an agent for some of the large insurers, we also compete with these underwriters through their owned agency operations. These national competitors include Fidelity National Title Insurance Company, Land America Title Insurance Company, Stewart Title Guaranty Company, First American Title Insurance Company and Old Republic Title Insurance Group. In addition, numerous agency operations and small underwriters provide competition on the local level.

Relocation Business (3%(2%, 5%3% and 10%5% of revenue for 2003, 2002 2001 and 2000,2001, respectively)

Cendant Mobility®Mobility is the largest provider of outsourced corporate employee relocation services in the worldUnited States and assistsin 2003 assisted more than 112,000111,000 affinity customers, transferring employees and global assignees, annually, including over 21,00025,000 transferring employees internationally each year in over 120135 countries. We deliver services from facilities in the United States, England, Australia, Singapore and Hong Kong. In addition, we deliver services at client facilities.

We primarily offer corporate and government clients employee relocation services, such asas:


The wide range of our services allows clients to outsource their entire relocation programs.programs to us.

9


Clients pay a fee for the services performed and/or permit Cendant Mobility to retain referral fees collected from brokers. We also receive commissions or referral fees from third-party service providers, such as van lines. The majority of our clients pay interest on home equity advances and reimburse all costs associated with our services, including, if necessary, repayment of home equity advances and reimbursement of losses on the sale of homes purchased. This limits our exposure on such items to the credit risk of our corporate clients and not onrather than to the potential changes in value of residential real estate. We believe such risk is minimal due to the credit quality of our corporate clients. Net credit losses as a percentage of the average balance of relocation receivables serviced has been less than 0.25% in each of the last five years. In addition, the average holding period for U.S. homes we purchased in 2002,2003 on behalf of our clients was 4844 days. In transactions where we assume the risk for losses on the sale of homes (primarily U.S. Federal government agency clients), which comprise less than 4% of net revenue for our relocation business,Relocation Business, we control all facets of the resale process, thereby limiting our exposure.

Our group move management service provides coordination for moves involving a large numberAbout 5% of employees over a short period of time. Our household goods moving service, with over 61,000 shipments annually, provides support for all aspects of moving an employee's household goods. We also handle insurance and claim assistance, invoice auditing and quality control of van line, driver and overall service.

Ourour relocation revenue is derived from our affinity services, which provide real estate and relocation services, including home buying and selling assistance, as well as mortgage assistance and moving services, to organizations such as insurance and airline companies that have established members. Often these organizations offer our affinity services to their members at no cost. This service helps the organizations attract new members and retain current members. Personal assistance is provided to over 58,00060,000 individuals, with approximately 27,000 real estate transactions annually. In addition, we derive about 6% of our relocation revenue from referrals within our real estate broker network.

Growth.Our strategy is to grow our global Relocation Business by generating business from corporations and U.S. Federal government agencies seeking to outsource their relocation function due to downsizing, cost containment initiatives and increased need for expense tracking. This strategy includes bringing innovative products and services to the market and expanding our business as a lower cost provider by focusing on operational improvements and collecting fees from our supplier partners to whom we refer business. We also seek to grow our affinity services business by increasing the number of accounts, as well as through higher penetration of existing accounts.

Competition.Competition is based on service, quality and price. We are the largest provider of outsourced relocation services in the United States and a leader in the United States, United Kingdom, Australia and Australia/Southeast Asia for outsourced relocations.Asia. In the United States, we compete with in-house relocation solutions and with numerous providers of outsourced relocation services, the largest of which is Prudential Relocation Management. Internationally, we compete with in-house solutions, local relocation providers and the international accounting firms.

10



Real Estate Services Seasonality

The principal sources of revenue for our real estate franchise, brokerage, mortgageReal Estate Franchise, Real Estate Brokerage, Mortgage and settlement services businessesSettlement Services Businesses are based upon the timing of residential real estate sales, which are generally lower in the first calendar quarter each year. The principal sources of revenue for our relocation businessRelocation Business are based upon the timing of transferee moves, which are generally lower in the first and last quarterquarters of each year.

Real Estate Services Trademarks and Intellectual Property

The trademarks "CENTURY 21", "Coldwell Banker",21," "Coldwell Banker, Commercial", "ERA"" "Coldwell Banker Commercial," "ERA," "Corcoran," "Sotheby's International Realty" (as of February 17, 2004), "Cendant Mobility",Mobility," and "Cendant Mortgage" and related trademarks and logos are material to our real estate franchise, relocationReal Estate Franchise, Relocation and mortgage businesses,Mortgage Businesses, respectively. Our franchisees and subsidiaries in our real estate services businessReal Estate Services segment actively use these marks and all of the material marks are registered (or have applications pending for registration) with the United States Patent and Trademark Office as well as major countries worldwide where these businesses have significant operations and are owned by us. We license the Sotheby's International Realty mark from SPTC, Inc., a subsidiary of Sotheby's Holdings, Inc.

10


Real Estate Services Employees

The businesses that make up our Real Estate Services segment employed approximately 20,00019,900 people as of December 31, 2002.2003.

HOSPITALITY SERVICES SEGMENT    (16%(14%, 18%16% and 21%18% of revenue for 2003, 2002 2001 and 2000,2001, respectively)

Lodging Franchise Business (3%(2%, 5%3% and 11%5% of revenue for 2003, 2002 2001 and 2000,2001, respectively)

We are the world's largest hotel franchisor, operating nine lodging franchise systems.

The lodging industry can be divided into four broad sectors based on price and services: upper upscale, with room rates above $110 per night; upscale, with room rates between $80 and $110 per night; middle market, with room rates generally between $55 and $79 per night; and economy, with room rates generally less than $55 per night. The following is a summary description of our lodging franchise systems properties that are open and operating as of December 31, 2002,2003, including the average occupancy rate, average room rate and total room revenue divided by total available rooms for each property, in each case for 2002.2003. We

11



do not own or operate hotel properties.

Information regarding such properties is derived from information we receive from our franchisees.

Brand

 Primary Domestic Sector Served
 Avg. Rooms Per Property
 # of Properties
 # of Rooms
 Location*
 Average Occupancy Rate
 Average Room Rate
 Total Room Revenue/ Available Rooms
Primary Domestic
Sector Served

 Avg.
Rooms
Per
Property

 # of
Properties

 # of Rooms
 Location*
 Average
Occupancy
Rate

 Average
Room Rate

 Total Room
Revenue/
Available
Rooms


AmeriHost

 

Middle Market

 

68

 

94

 

6,371

 

U.S. Only

 

55.8

%

$

56.98

 

$

31.79
Middle Market 69 103 7,077 U.S. and International(1) 58.3% $57.16 $33.30
Days Inn Upper Economy 84 1,902 158,824 U.S. and International(1) 46.1%$53.32 $24.58Upper Economy 84 1,892 157,995 U.S. and International(2) 47.6% $53.53 $25.49
Howard Johnson Middle Market 97 476 45,964 U.S. and International(2) 46.1%$59.37 $27.37Middle Market 95 471 44,971 U.S. and International(3) 46.2% $57.07 $26.39
Knights Inn Lower Economy 79 210 16,622 U.S. and International(3) 42.8%$38.11 $16.31Lower Economy 77 203 15,723 U.S. and International(4) 42.6% $37.03 $15.76
Ramada Middle Market 120 971 116,098 U.S. and International(4) 43.5%$61.62 $26.80Middle Market 116 905 104,636 U.S. and International(5) 45.2% $59.88 $27.08
Super 8 Motel Economy 61 2,083 126,862 U.S. and International(5) 52.3%$47.34 $24.76Economy 61 2,086 126,421 U.S. and International(6) 53.2% $48.38 $25.76
Travelodge Upper Economy 78 565 44,264 U.S. and International(6) 46.4%$53.59 $24.87Upper Economy Lower Economy 78 535 41,505 U.S. and International(7) 42.8% $51.10 $21.87
Villager Lower Economy 107 91 9,724 International(7) 46.6%$29.51 $13.75Lower Economy 107 71 7,613 U.S. and International(8) 42.5% $32.77 $13.92
Wingate Inn Upper Middle Market 94 121 11,368 U.S. and International(8) 57.1%$71.42 $40.78Upper Middle Market 94 133 12,494 U.S. and International(9) 58.6% $72.88 $42.73
     
 
            
 
          
Total     6,513 536,097 Total Average:     $25.28    6,399 518,435 Total Average:      $25.74
     
 
            
 
          

*
Description of rights owned or licensed.
(1)
73One property located in Canada.
(2)
77 properties located in Canada and 4557 properties located in Argentina, China, Czech Republic, Egypt, England, Hungary, India, Ireland, Italy, Jordan, Mexico, Philippines, South Africa and Uruguay.
(2)(3)
4154 properties located in Canada, and 3741 properties located in Argentina, China, Columbia, Dominican Republic, Dutch Antilles, Ecuador, England, Ireland,Guatemala, India, Israel, Jordan, Malta, Mexico, Oman, Peru, Venezuela and United Arab Emirates.
(3)(4)
Seven12 properties located in Canada.
(4)(5)
Limited to the Continental U.S., Alaska, Hawaii and Canada.
(5)(6)
94101 properties located in Canada.
(6)(7)
115116 properties located in Canada and two properties located in Mexico.
(7)(8)
TwoThree properties located in Canada and one property located in Mexico.
(8)(9)
One propertyTwo properties located in Canada.

11


Our Lodging Franchise Business derives substantially all of its revenue from franchise fees, which are comprised of royalty and marketing/reservation fees and are normally charged as a percentage of the franchisee's gross room revenue.fees. The royalty fee is intended to cover our operating expenses, and the cost of the trademark, such as expenses incurred for franchise services, including quality assurance, administrative support and design and construction advice, and to provide the franchisorus with operating profits. The marketing/reservation fee is intended to reimburse the franchisor for expenses associated with providing such franchise services as a central reservation system, national advertising and marketing programs and certain training programs. Since we do not own or operate hotel properties (we derive our revenue for this business from franchise fees), we do not incur renovation expenditures. Renovation costs are the obligation of each franchisee. Similar to our Real Estate Franchise Business, our Lodging Franchise Business also derives revenue through our Preferred Alliance Program.

Our lodging franchisees are dispersed geographically, which minimizes our exposure to any one hotel owner or geographic region. Of the more than 6,500approximately 6,400 properties and approximately 4,8004,900 franchisees in our lodging systems, no individual hotel owner accounts for more than 2% of our franchised lodging properties.

12In 2003, we launched TripRewards, a new loyalty program which enables customers to earn points when purchasing services from any of our lodging brands or Avis, Budget, RCI, Fairfield, Trendwest or Jackson Hewitt. Customers can also earn points when purchasing from over 30 other retailers. Customers can redeem TripRewards points for stays at our lodging brands or with over 100 other retailers and restaurants, including Home Depot, Circuit City, Olive Garden and Chili's. Businesses where points can be earned pay a fee to participate in the program and those fees are then used to reimburse the businesses where the points are redeemed. We intend to commence marketing for TripRewards in the first quarter of 2004.


Growth.    The sale of long-term franchise agreements to operators of existing and newly constructed hotels is the leading source of revenue and earnings growth in our lodging franchise business.Lodging Franchise Business. We believe that 30%48% of hotel owners in the United States are independent.independent and not affiliated with any franchise.

We market franchises principally to independent hotel and motel owners, as well as to owners who have the right to terminate franchise affiliations of their properties with other hotel brands. We believe that our existing franchisees also represent a significant potential growth opportunity because many own, or may own in the future, other hotels, which can be converted to our brand names. Accordingly, a significant factor in our sales strategy is maintaining the satisfaction of our existing franchisees by providing quality services. We employ a national franchise sales force, compensated primarily through commissions, consisting of approximately 80 sales personnel.commissions.

We seek to expand our franchise systems on an international basis through license agreements with developers, franchisors and franchisees based outside the United States. As of December 31, 2002,2003, our franchising subsidiaries (other than Ramada and AmeriHost) have entered into international licensing agreements for part or all of approximately 2324 countries on five continents.

Central Reservation Systems.    The lodging business is characterized by remote purchasing through travel agencies and through the use by consumers of toll-free telephone numbers and the Internet. We maintain fourthree reservation centers that are located in Knoxville, Tennessee; Aberdeen, South Dakota; and Saint John, New Brunswick, Canada; and Cork, Ireland.Canada. In 2002, our brand Web sites had approximately 264 million page views and2003, we booked an aggregate of approximately 3.74.9 million roomnights from all Internet booking sources, compared withto approximately 222 million page views and 2.03.7 million roomnights booked in 2001, increases2002, an increase of 19% and 85%, respectively.32%.

Competition.    Competition among the national lodging brand franchisors to grow and maintain their franchise systems is intense. Our largest national lodging brand competitors are the Holiday Inn and Best Western brands and Choice Hotels, which franchises seven brands, including the Comfort Inn, Quality Inn and Econo Lodge brands. Our Days Inn, Travelodge and Super 8 brands compete with brands, including the Comfort Inn, Red Roof Inn and Econo Lodge brands, in the economy sector. Our Ramada, Howard

12



Johnson, Wingate Inn and AmeriHost Inn brands compete with brands, including Holiday Inn and Hampton Inn, in the middle market sector. Our Knights Inn and Travelodge brands compete with Motel 6 and similar properties. In addition, a lodging facility owner may choose not to affiliate with a franchisor but to remain independent.

We believe that competition for the sale of franchises in the lodging industry is based principally upon the perceived value and quality of the brand and services offered to franchisees. We believe that prospective franchisees value a franchise based upon their view of the cost/benefit relationship between affiliation and conversion costs and future charges to the potential for increased revenue and profitability and the reputation of the franchisor. We also believe that the perceived value of brand names to prospective franchisees is, to some extent, a function of the success of the brand's existing franchisees.

The ability of an individual franchisee to compete may be affected by the location and quality of its property, the number of competing properties in the vicinity, its affiliation with a recognized brand name, community reputation and other factors. A franchisee's success may also be affected by general, regional and local economic conditions. The potential negative effect of these conditions on our results of operations is substantially reduced by virtue of the diverse geographical locations of our franchised properties.

Timeshare Exchange Business(4% (3%, 6%4% and 10%5% of revenue for 2003, 2002 2001 and 2000,2001, respectively)

Our Resort Condominiums International LLC ("RCI") subsidiary is a leading provider of timeshare vacation exchange opportunities and services for approximately 3 million timeshare subscribers from more than 3,7003,800 resorts in nearlyover 100 countries around the world.countries. Our RCI®RCI business consists primarily of the operation of two worldwide exchange programs for timeshare owners of condominium timeshares at affiliated resorts, both in and outside the U.S., the operation of a vacation rental network consisting of vacation inventory available for rent to consumers, the publication of magazines and other periodicals related to the vacation and

13



timeshare industry and travel-related services and resort management.services. RCI has significant operations in North America, Europe, the Middle East, Latin America, Southern Africa, Australia and the Pacific Rim. RCI also has limited operations in the Middle East. RCI charges its subscribers an annual subscription fee and an exchange fee for each exchange, resulting in revenues from such fees totalingof approximately $425$464 million during 2002 and generated approximately $65 million from resort management services.2003.

Growth.    The timeshare exchange industry has experienced significant growth over the past decade. We believe that the factors driving this growth include the demographic trend toward older, more affluent Americans who travel more frequently; the entrance of major hospitality and entertainment companies into timeshare development; a worldwide acceptance of the timeshare concept; and an increasing focus on leisure activities, family travel and a desire for value, variety and flexibility in a vacation experience. We believe that future growth of the timeshare exchange industry will be determined by general economic conditions both in the United States and worldwide, the public image of the industry, improved approaches to marketing and sales and a greater variety of products and price points. Accordingly, we cannot predict if future growth trends will continue at rates comparable to those of the recent past. RCI members are acquired through developers; as a result, the growth of the timeshare exchange businessour Timeshare Exchange Business is dependent on the sale of timeshare units by affiliated resorts. RCI affiliates consist of international brand names and independent developers, owners' associations and vacation clubs.

Competition.    The global timeshare exchange industry is comprised of a number of entities, including resort developers and owners. RCI's competitors include specialized firms such as Interval International Inc., vacation club products, internal exchange programs offered by the Walt Disney Co., Marriott, Starwood, Hilton and Hyatt and regional and local timeshare exchange companies.

13



Timeshare Sales and Marketing Business( (8%, 8% and 6%7% of revenue for 2003, 2002 and 2001, respectively)

We acquiredThrough our Fairfield subsidiary in April 2001. In the first quarter of 2002, we acquired our Equivest subsidiary for approximately $98 million and in the second quarter of 2002, we acquired our Trendwest subsidiary for approximately $891 million of our common stock (approximately 47.4 million shares) plus the assumption of $89 million of debt. Through these subsidiaries, we are the largest vacation ownership company in the United States in terms of property owners and vacation units constructed. Our vacation ownership business includes sales and marketing of vacation ownership interests, providing consumer financing to individuals purchasing vacation ownership interests and providing property management services to property owners' associations at our resorts. We believe we have a well balanced portfolio of properties with a high degree of geographic and customer diversity, helping to insulate our timeshare operations from regional downturns. We have integrated our Equivest subsidiary into Fairfield. While we intend to operate Fairfield and Trendwest as separate brands, we expect to cross market to all of our timeshare owners and obtain referrals from our lodging and car rental operations. We also continueare presently undertaking strategic initiatives to evaluate cost savings that could be achieved by consolidatingintegrate certain administrativebusiness functions of our timeshare businesses.Fairfield and Trendwest, including consumer finance, information technology, certain staff functions, product development and certain marketing activities. We plan to utilize a points-based sales system at all of our timeshare companiesboth Fairfield and Trendwest to provide our owners with flexibility as to resort location and length of stay. In addition, through Equivest Capital, we are a lender to third party resorts. In 2002, Equivest Capital made loans of $54.2 million to such resorts.

Fairfield Resorts, Inc.Resorts.    Fairfield, based in Orlando, Florida, acquires, plans, designs and constructs timeshare properties and markets, sells and marketsfinances vacation products that provide quality recreational experiences to its more than 459,000480,000 property owners and customers. As of December 31, 2002,2003, Fairfield's portfolio of resorts consisted of 7374 resorts, ninefive of which are in various stages of construction, located in 2120 states and the U.S. Virgin Islands. The average purchase price of a Fairfield vacation ownership interest is $12,500. Timeshare owners pay$14,000. Fairfield's vacation products consist of a deeded interest in a particular unit or resort for a specified period of time annually. The annual maintenance fees ranging from $300-$600 per year forassociated with the average vacation ownership interest purchased ranges from $300-$600, paid per year to a separate property owners' association. These fees are used to replace and renovate furnishings, defray maintenance and cleaning costs and cover taxes, insurance and other related costs. Typically, the property owners' associations contract with Fairfield or RCI Resort Management to manage the properties.

14



Trendwest Resorts, Inc.Resorts.    Trendwest, based in Redmond, Washington, acquires, plans, designs and constructs timeshare properties and markets, sells and finances WorldMark®,WorldMark, The Club and WorldMark South Pacific Club vacation ownership interests and also acquires and develops resorts.interests. The 5259 properties Trendwest markets are located primarily in the western United States, British Columbia, Mexico, Hawaii and the South Pacific. At December 31, 2002, the Clubs2003, Trendwest had over 184,940215,000 vacation credit owners. Trendwest's vacation ownership interests consist of vacation points which entitle the owner to book a vacation through the WorldMark system. In 2002,2003, the average new owner purchased approximately 6,7806,700 vacation credits for a purchase price of approximately $9,485.$9,700. Owners of an average Trendwest vacation ownership interest pay annual maintenance fees of approximately $350 per year to WorldMark, The Club.

TheWorldMark Clubs.    Trendwest formed WorldMark, The Club and WorldMark South Pacific Club (collectively the "Clubs") in 1989 and 1999, respectively. WorldMark, The Club is a California non-profit mutual benefit corporation and WorldMark South Pacific Club is a registered managed "investment scheme" administered by Trendwest Resorts South Pacific Limited as the Responsible Entity (similar to a trustee under U.S. law) and regulated by the Australian Securities and Investments Commission ("ASIC"). The Clubs own, operate and manage the real property conveyed to the Clubs by Trendwest. Trendwest develops vacation properties and deeds them to the Clubs free and clear of monetary encumbrances in exchange for the exclusive right to sell the vacation credits associated with the properties contributed and retain the proceeds. Our continuing investmentownership interest in both Clubs results from Trendwest's ownership of unsold vacation credits. The percentage of vacation credits owned by Trendwest in WorldMark, The Clubthe Clubs is minimal.

Trendwest has management agreements with the Clubs under which Trendwest acts as the exclusive manager and servicing agent of the vacation owner programs. Trendwest oversees the property management and service levels of the resorts as well as certain administrative functions. As compensation for services, Trendwest, in general, receives a portion of budgeted annual expenses and reserves. TheEach of the management agreementagreements of WorldMark, The Club and WorldMark South Pacific provides for automatic one-year and five-year renewals, respectively, unless such renewal is denied by a majority of the voting power of the owners, which excludes Trendwest. The WorldMark South Pacific management agreement provides for automatic 5-year renewals unless such renewals are denied by a majority of the voting power of the owners, which exclude Trendwest. The revenues received by Cendantgenerated from Trendwest's management

14



activities for the period from April 30, 2002 (acquisition date) through December 31, 20022003 were $1.5$3.5 million, net of dues we paid to the Clubs on the unsold vacation credits we own.

FFD Development Company LLC.    Fairfield's timeshare resort development function, consisting of property, acquisition, planning, design and construction is conducted by FFD Development Company, LLC ("FFD"). FFD is also our primary acquirer and developer of timeshare inventory and develops new resorts or expands existing units as required by Fairfield. We acquired FFD on February 3, 2003 and it became one of our wholly owned subsidiaries in order to augment our growing timeshare business and given FFD's knowledge of Fairfield's business. Prior to our acquisition of FFD, we owned a convertible preferred interest and warrants to purchase common interests in FFD.

CustomerConsumer Financing.    Both Fairfield and Trendwest offer financing to the purchasers of vacation ownership interests. Loans extended are typically securitized through qualified special purpose entities.securitized. Fairfield and Trendwest continue to service loans extended by them and therefore remain responsible for the maintenance of accounts receivable files and all customer service, billing and collection activities.activities through our consumer finance operation located in Las Vegas, Nevada. This operation employs 311 people. In addition, we employ 75 people in Redmond, Washington who are responsible for Trendwest's compliance and loan servicing. As of December 31, 2003, we serviced a portfolio of 240,000 loans totaling $1.9 billion in aggregate principal amount outstanding. Approximately 80% of our borrowers make their loan payments through direct withdrawal.

Sales and Marketing.    Fairfield sells its vacation ownership interests primarily through its points-based vacation system, FairShare Plus® at both35 resort locations and 7 off-site sales centers. Trendwest's sales primarily occur at 3135 off-site sales offices located in metropolitan areas in six regions, including the South Pacific. The remainder of its sales occur at 1619 on-site sales offices.

Growth.    The growth strategy for our timeshare salesTimeshare Sales and marketing businessMarketing Business is driven primarily by further development of existing and future resort locations. Numerous factors, including favorable demographic trends and low overall penetration of potential demand indicate continued potential growth in the timeshare industry. We also continually explore strategic corporate alliances and other transactions that would complement our timeshare salesTimeshare Sales and marketing business.Marketing Business.

15



Competition.    The timeshare sales and marketing industry is highly competitive and is comprised of a number of companies specializing primarily in timeshare development, sales and marketing. In addition, a number of national hospitality chains develop and sell vacation ownership interests to consumers. Our largest competitors include Disney Vacation Club, Marriott Ownership Resorts, Inc., Starwood Vacation Ownership, Inc. and Hilton Grand Vacations Company LLC.LLC, Marriott Ownership Resorts, Inc. and Starwood Vacation Ownership, Inc.

Vacation Home Rental Business( (1%, 1% and 1% of revenue for 2003, 2002 and 2001, respectively)

In 2001, we acquired Holiday Cottages Group Ltd. and Cuendet Cie SpA which market privately owned holiday properties for rent in Europe. In 2002, we acquired Novasol A.S, Welcome Holidays Limited and The International Life Group, which also market privately owned holiday properties for rent in Europe. We purchased Novasol for $66 million in cash. The acquisition of Welcome Holidays and The International Life Group were not material to Cendant. As a result of these acquisitions, we are the largest self-catering cottage and villa rental company in Europe. We market privately-owned holiday properties for rent in Europe under the brands Cuendet, Dansommer®, Novasol®, Blakes®Dansommer, Novasol, Blakes Holidays in Britain, Ferrysavers.com®,Ferrysavers.com, Country Manors, Les Manoirs, Country Holidays,Cottages, Country Cottages in France, Country Cottages in Ireland, English Country Cottages, Welcome Holidays, Italian Life®,Life, French Life®Life and Chez Nous®.Nous. We derive revenue primarily through commissions on the rental of the cottagesvacation homes which range from 25% to 35%40% of the gross rent. We do not generally own any cottagesproperties, but act as an intermediary for the owners in exchange for a fee.

Our Vacation Home Rental Business has relationships with approximately 35,000 independent property owners in the United Kingdom, France, Ireland, the Netherlands, Italy, Spain, Portugal, Denmark, Norway, Sweden, Germany, Greece, Austria, Switzerland and eastern Europe. These property owners contract annually with our Vacation Home Rental subsidiaries to market their collective 40,000 rental properties. In 2002,2003, our Vacation Home Rental Business soldhad approximately 390,000 rental weeks618,000 bookings consisting principally of vacation home rentals sold on behalf of vacation property owners. Weowners, but also marketincluding camping holidays and boat rentals in the UK,United Kingdom, the Netherlands and France, as well asand ferry crossings in mostmany European countries.

Our Vacation Home Rental subsidiaries market theirthe properties they represent globally through direct marketing, the Internet and through tour operators and travel agents.

Growth.    Our strategy is to provide sophisticated brand marketing and reservations for the benefit of owners of vacation home accommodations. We intend to increase our contract property portfolio and to

15



make all contract inventory in our portfolio available to the global marketplace. Marketing strategies include establishing an optimal balance between direct, partner, online and travel agent marketing. We also attempt to leverage other Cendant businesses to increase the marketing and distribution of our holiday property portfolio.

Competition.    Companies that are part of the European Self Cateringself-catering industry, in which we operate, rent an aggregate of 18 million vacations to consumers on an annual basis. LargeThis market is highly fragmented, and even the large operators which offer rentals of vacation parks, cottages and villas, campsites and apartments aresuch as Bourne Leisure, Holidaybreak and Interhome.Interhome, represent only a small portion of industry volume. We believe that competition for vacation rental properties is based principally on the number of properties offered.

Hospitality Trademarks and Intellectual Property

The service marks "Days Inn," "Ramada," "Howard Johnson," "Super 8," "Travelodge," "Wingate Inn," "Villager," "Knights Inn," "AmeriHost Inn," "RCI," "Resort Condominiums International," "Fairfield," "Worldmark""Trendwest," "WorldMark" and related trademarks and logos are material to the businesses in our Hospitality businesses.segment. The subsidiaries that operate our timeshare businesses and our franchisees actively use the marks which are registered (or have applications pending) with the United States Patent and Trademark Office as well as major countries worldwide where our hospitality business hasbusinesses have significant operations. We own all the marks listed above other than the "Ramada" and "Days Inn" domestic marks. We own the Travelodge mark only in North America and are limited to using the "Ramada" marks in the Continental U.S., Alaska, Hawaii and, since 2002, in Canada. We license the Canadian "Ramada" trademark from Marriott. We license the domestic "Ramada" and "Days Inn" marks from a venture we have with Marriott International, Inc. We

16



In 2004, we expect to redeem Marriott's interest in the venture for approximately $200 million and upon such redemption we will own the "Worldmark"domestic "Ramada" and "Days Inn" marks. We own the "WorldMark" mark pursuant to an assignment agreement with Worldmark.WorldMark. If our relationship with WorldmarkWorldMark should terminate, such mark would revert back to WorldmarkWorldMark upon request.

Hospitality Seasonality

Our lodging franchise businessLodging Franchise Business generates higher revenue during the summer months because of increased leisure travel. Therefore, any occurrence that disrupts travel patterns during the summer period could have a greater adverse effect on our lodging franchisee'sfranchisees' annual performance and consequently our annual performance than in other periods. A principal source of timeshare exchange revenue relates to exchange services to members. Since members have historically shown a tendency to plan their vacations in the first quarter of the year, revenues are generally slightly higher in the first quarter. In timeshare sales, we rely upon tour flow in order to generate timeshare sales; consequently, sales volume tends to increase in the summer months as increased tourist travel results in additional increaseda result of greater tour flow.flow from summer travelers. We cannot predict whether these trends will continue in the future asfuture.

Most consumers in our Vacation Home Rental Business book accommodations 8 to 15 weeks in advance of their departure date. Approximately 50% of departure dates fall during the timeshare sales business expands outside ofsummer. Therefore, most bookings are made during the United Statesfirst and Europe, and as global travel patterns shift withsecond quarters. Recently, some consumers have begun to book accommodations closer to their departure date shifting some bookings to the aging of the world population.third quarter.

Hospitality Employees

The businesses that make up our Hospitality Services segment employed approximately 20,00022,950 people as of December 31, 2002.2003.

16


TRAVEL DISTRIBUTION SERVICES SEGMENT(12% (9%, 5%12% and 2%5% of revenue for 2003, 2002 2001 and 2000,2001, respectively)

With the acquisitions of Galileo International, Inc. and Cheap Tickets, Inc. in October 2001, we added a newOur Travel Distribution segment in 2001 comprised of (i) our global distribution services business through Galileo International, (ii) our travel agency business, including Cheap Tickets, and (iii) our reservations processing, connectivity and information management services business through WizCom®, TRUST Internationalsm and THOR®. For 2000, revenue included in this segment was generated from our travel agency business, which was conducted by Cendant Travel.

Our travel distribution division is one of the leading providers of travel informationcontent and transaction processing services in the world. To better service our clients, our Travel Distribution Segment was restructured in 2002world and is grouped into five service functions:categories based on the customer group served by such category: Travel Agency Services, which includes Galileo ClientInternational, THOR, Travelwire, Travel 2 and Travel 4; Retail Travel Services, Highwirewhich includes CheapTickets.com, Cendant Travel and RCI Travel; Travelport Corporate Services,Solutions; Hospitality and Leisure Services, Airlinewhich includes Lodging.com and Neat Group; and Supplier Services, which includes WizCom, TRUST International and RetailShepherd Systems. Our Travel Services. Our Galileo ClientAgency Services business generated approximately 92%91% of the revenue for the Travel Distribution Segmentsegment in 2002.2003.

Galileo ClientTravel Agency Services

We provide, through Galileo, an electronic global distribution and computer reservation servicessystem ("GDS") for the travel industry utilizing a computerized reservation system. Through our Apollo®Travel suppliers such as airlines, hotel companies and Galileo® computerized reservation systems,car rental firms store, display, manage and sell their products and services through our GDS subsidiary provides travelsystem. We market our GDS under the brands Apollo and Galileo. Apollo is utilized in North America and Japan, and Galileo is utilized in the rest of the world. Travel agencies and other subscribers at approximately 45,00043,000 locations throughout the world and numerous Internet travel sites, such as CheapTickets.com, as well as corporations and consumers whothat use our self-booking products, with the abilitysuch as those provided by Travelport Corporate Solutions, are able to access schedule and fare information, book reservations and issue tickets for more thannearly 500 airlines. Travel agency subscribers represent a significant source of bookings that result in fees payable by travel suppliers to Galileo. Bookings generated by our five largest travel agency subscribers constituted approximately 22% of the bookings made through our GDS in 2003. Our GDS subsidiary also provides subscribers with information and booking capabilities covering approximately 30 car rental companies and more than 200approximately 240 hotel companies with approximately 52,000nearly 60,000 properties throughout the world. In 2002,2003, Galileo completedprocessed approximately 292267 million bookings. Our GDS subsidiaryGalileo operates in approximately 120 countries. Approximately 63%

We generate the vast majority of our distribution revenues are generated outside the United States. Under a ten-year, $1.4 billion information technology services arrangement with IBM Global Services, effective December 2001, IBM provides information technology management services such as managing our data center and operating our 1,400-plus computer servers. IBM also provides help desk and desk top support to other Cendant businesses.

Substantially all of our electronic GDS revenue is derived from booking fees paid by travel suppliers, such as airlines, car rental companies and hotel companies. Travel suppliers store, display, manage and sell their services through our systems. Airlines and other travel suppliers are offered varying levels of functionality

17



at which they can participate in our systems. Our Apollo system is utilized in North America and Japan, and our Galileo system is utilized in the rest of the world.suppliers. In 2002,2003, approximately 93% of our booking fee revenues were generated from airlines. Other GDS revenue sources include lease fees for equipment provided to subscribers, such as travel agents, as well as advertising revenues paid by travel suppliers. We generate approximately 63% of our GDS revenues outside the United States.

Additional products and services provided through Travel Agency Services include: our THOR subsidiary, which provides 24-hour travel reservation assistance to customers of its travel agency clients; our Travelwire subsidiary, which provides mid-office solutions to tour operators and travel agencies through its Transfer software; and our Travel 2 and Travel 4 subsidiaries, acquired in November 2003 and which specialize in providing inventory for long-haul travel exclusively through the travel agency channel. The Travel 2 and Travel 4 acquisitions were not material to us. We have also introduced new products to increase revenues for our travel agency subscribers, such as Galileo NeatAgent, which allows travel agency subscribers the ability to offer customized vacation packages from their desktops, and Galileo Web! Hotels, which provides travel agency subscribers with desktop access to merchant hotel rates.

United Air Lines, Inc. is the largest single travel supplier utilizing our systems,system, generating revenues thatof approximately $141 million relating to hosting, network services and GDS booking fees, which accounted for approximately 11%9% of our total Galileo GDSTravel Distribution segment revenues in 2002.2003. In December2003, Galileo entered into a ten-year agreement with United to provide reservations system technology and other services. In 2002, UAL Corporation, the parent of United, Air Lines, Inc., filed for bankruptcy protection. Our contracts withIn 2003, United have been granted the approval for payment underagreed to pay substantially all of its pre-petition and post-petition motions in connection with UAL's bankruptcy and we expect any losses duedebt to non-payment of amounts outstanding to be immaterial. However, ifGalileo. If UAL does not successfully emerge from bankruptcy, as expected in 2004, we would not expect to recover outstanding amounts outstanding,as of the date of any

17



subsequent liquidation, which could approximate $30range from $20 to $40 million, and we would expect certain components of our Travel Distribution revenue for this segment, such as revenue derivedgenerated from web sitereservation and reservation hosting,network management services (excluding GDS booking fees), to be negatively impacted. In 2002, we generated approximately $95 million of such revenue from United primarily on a cost-plus basis. We would not expect this bankruptcy to have a material impact to any of our other revenue streams.

Our airline customers haveThe travel industry has been negatively impacted by low levelsthe military conflict in Iraq, terrorist threat alerts, continuing economic pressures, and SARS concerns in the Asia-Pacific region and other parts of travel activity due to economic conditions and the possibility of war, hostilities and terrorist attacks.world. As a result, several major carrierstravel suppliers are experiencing liquidity problems and some, such as UAL, US Airways Group and U.S. AirwaysANC Rental Group, have sought, and others may seek, bankruptcy protection. Therefore, the risk of non-payment of GDS fees from airlinetravel suppliers has increased. In addition, war, hostilitiesTravel activity could be further reduced if any of these conditions continue or further terrorist attacksresurface, which could further reduce travel activity.negatively impact our Travel Distribution segment.

Travel agencies access our systems using hardware and software typically provided by us or by independent national distribution companies ("NDCs"), although travel agencies can choose to purchase their own hardware and certain software. NDCs are third party distributors who receive a commission forOn December 31, 2003, the sale and servicingUnited States Department of Galileo and Apollo technology to travel agents. We, internally or through our NDCs, also provide technical supportTransportation announced that it would allow most of the rules governing pricing, fare displays and other assistancebusiness practices of GDSs to travel agencies. Multinational travel agencies constitute an important categorysunset on January 31, 2004. The few remaining rules will expire on July 31, 2004. Such rules had been implemented to protect consumers when the GDSs were controlled by airlines. In anticipation of such deregulation and as part of our commitment to provide our subscribers due towith a range of new solutions and capabilities for increasing revenue, we executed fare agreements with six major airlines in the high volume of business that can be generated through a single relationship. Bookings generated byUnited States under our five largestPreferred Fares Select Program and with British Airways. These agreements provide our travel agency subscribers and their customers constituted approximately 20%with complete access to all participating carriers' published fares for a three-year term. We are currently negotiating similar agreements with other international and domestic airlines in anticipation of the bookings made throughongoing deregulation efforts worldwide. We do not anticipate any near term negative impact on our systems in 2002.travel distribution services business from deregulation.

Product Distribution.Distribution of Products and Services.    We market, distribute and support our Galileo products toand services for subscribers primarily through our internal sales and marketing organizationorganizations ("SMOs"). We also distribute our products through our relationships with independent NDCs. Our local SMOs distribute our products in North America, throughout the United Kingdom, Belgium, France, Germany, Spain, Portugal, the Netherlands, Switzerland, Sweden, Finland, Norway, Russia, Australia, New Zealand, Hong Kong, Singapore, the Philippines, Brazil and Venezuela. Bookings made through SMOs collectivelyworld, which accounted for approximately 72%76% of our 20022003 bookings.

In regions not supported directly by our SMOs, we provide our products and services through our relationships with independent NDCs throughnational distribution agreements entered into with Galileo. The NDC is responsible for cultivating the relationship with subscribers in its territory, installing subscribers' computer equipment, maintaining the hardware and software supplied to the subscribers and providing ongoing customer support. The NDC earns a share of the booking fees generated in the NDCs territory, as well as all subscriber fees billed in that marketplace. NDCs,companies ("NDCs"), which are typically owned or operated by the national airline of the relevant country or a local travel-related business,business. Each NDC is responsible for maintaining the relationship with subscribers in its territory and providing ongoing customer support. We pay each NDC a share of the booking fees generated in the NDC's territory, and the NDC retains all subscriber fees billed in the territory. NDCs accounted for approximately 28%24% of our booking volume in 2002. In 2002, we acquired our NDCs in Italy, Ireland and Denmark for approximately $125 million in cash.2003.

Growth.    In order to grow our GDS business, we intend to expand our focus beyond booking fees to become a retailer of travel inventory and travel products and services, and thereby strengthen our relationships with our travel suppliers and travel agency customers. In doing so, we intend to continue to capitalize on our competitive strengths, the key elements of which are: (i) Cendant's business to business expertisebusiness-to-business relationships and relationships,travel-related assets; (ii) a diversified global presence,presence; (iii) established relationships with a diverse group of travel suppliers and subscribers,travel agencies; (iv) a comprehensive offering of innovative products and services; and (v) new product and services initiatives with uniquestrong appeal to travel consumers, agencies and suppliers. We believe that the distribution network established through our independent NDCs provides us with a local presence in countries throughout the world. In addition, we continue to strengthen our presence in developing and emerging economies that provide future growth opportunities, such as Eastern Europe, Africa, the Middle East and Asia. We believe that in-depth knowledge of the local travel economies in which we distribute our products is essential to developing and

18



strengthening our ties to travel suppliers and the local travel agencies that generate significant booking volumes.

We will continue to assess opportunities to acquire distributors in profitable, highly automated markets, where we can realize attractive economic returns and enhance our customer service. We intend to continue to pursue opportunities to further utilize our computerized reservation system to distribute travel through a variety of means and to continue to develop leading technologies, integrate additional travel content into our products, further strengthen our relationships with our agency and supplier customers and maintain our position as a leading player in the integrated electronic travel distribution marketplace.

Information Services.    We currently provide fare quotation services through our GlobalFares™ quotation system to approximately 70 airlines worldwide. GlobalFares is used in conjunction with each airline's internal reservation system and provides pricing information.

We also provide internal reservation services to United Air Lines pursuant to a computer services agreement which terminates at the end of 2004. Such services include the display of schedules and availability, the reservation, sale and ticketing of travel services and the display of other travel-related information to United Air Lines' airport offices, city ticket offices and reservation centers internationally. In addition, we provide certain other internal management services to United Air Lines, including network management, departure control, availability displays, inventory management, database management and software development.

Competition.    Our competitors includeinclude: the three major traditional global distribution system companies:GDS companies, Sabre, Inc., Amadeus Global Travel Distribution, LLC and Worldspan;Worldspan, L.P.; the major regional reservation systems, including Abacus International, Inc., Axess International Network, Inc., Infini Travel Information, Inc. and Topas;Topas Co., Ltd.; and other travel infrastructure companies such as Pegasus SystemsSolutions, Inc., Navitaire, Inc. and Datalex; and firms that operate in the virtual travel services sector such as Expedia, Travelocity, Hotels.com and Orbitz.Datalex Communications USA, Inc. We also compete with alternative channels by which travel products and services are distributed; for example, some low costairlines operate computerized reservation systems on their web sites, and some low-cost airline carriers do not utilize a GDS distribution channel. In addition,

18



travelers are increasingly using the Internet to make their own bookings, thereby shifting business away from the travel agency community.

Competition to attract and retain travel agency subscribers is intense. As a result, we and other computerized reservation system service providers offer incentives to travel agency subscribers if they achieve certain productivity or booking volume growth targets are achieved.targets. Although continued expansion of the use of such incentive payments could adversely affect our profitability, our failure to continue to make such incentive payments could result in the loss of some travel agency subscribers.

New regulation has been proposed which could eliminate current rules requiring airlines that own GDS companies to participate in each GDS. If these new rules are adopted our competitive position could be weakened and our business could be adversely impacted. We do not expect the new rules, if any, to be adopted prior to 2004.

Highwire CorporateRetail Travel Services

We provide retail travel services through Cheap Tickets, Cendant Travel and RCI Travel. We are a full service travel agency, providing airline, car rental, hotel, vacation packages and other travel reservation and fulfillment services. We provide such services through Cheap Tickets, Travelers Advantage, our individual membership program, and to members of our Timeshare Exchange Business. We generate revenue from commissions on bookings from hoteliers, car rental companies, airlines, cruise lines and tour operators, as well as mark-ups on travel inventory. We also generate transaction-related advertising revenue from our online agency, CheapTickets.com.

We work directly with travel suppliers, such as airlines, car rental companies, hoteliers and tour and cruise operators to secure both non-published and regularly available fares, rates and tariffs to supply the best possible rates and discounted travel to our customers. We market and distribute this inventory to customers through our branded web basedsite, CheapTickets.com, and through our membership channels. We book transactions primarily through our GDS and fulfill them through our travel agency network and ticketing operations. We maintain four call centers located in: Colorado Springs and Denver-Aurora, Colorado; Moore, Oklahoma; and Nashville, Tennessee.

In April 2003, we reacquired the common stock of Trip Network, Inc. by converting our preferred stock and purchasing the remainder of Trip Network's common stock for $4 million. In connection with this acquisition, we reacquired the rights for the online businesses, Trip.com and CheapTickets.com, which combined provide access to approximately 31 million registered users. The Trip.com web site ceased active operation in April 2003 to consolidate resources and technology in CheapTickets.com.

Growth.    We intend to build on our existing position as a leading provider of online travel to deliver against initiatives that provide high margin products to our customers. We also intend to enhance our marketing efforts to strengthen our Cheap Tickets brand and its position as a leading retailer of attractive and well-priced travel content. We also intend to integrate travel content from other Travel Distribution businesses, enabling us to earn higher margins. Our complementary product and technology strategies are focused on improving the customer experience by providing industry leading features and functionality, while maintaining a robust operating environment.

Competition.    We compete with a large number of leisure travel agencies, including Liberty Travel, Inc. and American Express Travel Related Services Company, Inc., and companies with Internet travel web sites, such as Orbitz, Inc., InterActiveCorp's Expedia, Inc., Hotels.com L.P. and Hotwire.com businesses, Sabre, Inc.'s Travelocity.com L.P. and Priceline.com Incorporated.

Travelport Corporate Solutions

Travelport Corporate Solutions (formerly known as Highwire), rebranded and launched in August 2003, offers our corporate customers the services of our GDS, our corporate online booking tool, and fulfillment services to meet their corporate travel requirements. We offer these services on a stand-alone basis or as an end-to-end solution, whereby corporate travel departments subscribing to Travelport will be able to rely

19


solely upon the family of companies in our Travel Distribution segment to complete booking and ticketing. Our web-based corporate travel solutions includinginclude online, self-booking capabilities, throughticketing and support that enable our Highwire subsidiary. Highwire™ allows its corporate customers to manage their numerous travel supplier agreements and extensive corporate travel policies, while offering their employees unique web basedweb-based tools for making travel arrangements. SomeWe generate revenues from online booking fees paid by corporate customers on a per transaction basis. We also collect transaction fees from corporate customers for fulfillment and customer care services offered as part of Highwire's clients include Microsoft, Nike and Nordstrom. Revenue is derived from our end-to-end corporate clients for each booking made by their employees through our product.travel solution. Travelport was launched in October 2003 in the United Kingdom.

Growth.    We areremain focused on increasing the ratesnumber of corporate bookings withmade by our existing corporate clients continued penetration of the corporate travel sector byand pursuing additional large corporate clients. We intend to integrate travel content available through other Travel Distribution companies to provide our clients with superior rates and the expansion ofproducts. We are focused on providing corporate travel solutions to existing and future clients both through our product offeringsindividual services in North America and Europe and through global channels.our end-to-end solutions in North America.

Competition.    Our primary competition stemscomes from majorcompanies offering a full package of services for corporate clients, such as Expedia Corporate Travel, Orbitz for Business, Travelocity for Business, American Express, and companies that sell online booking tools to corporate clients and travel agencies, that servicewhich incorporate the tools as part of their offering to corporate travel sector and providers of self-booking tools, includingclients, including: Outtask, Inc., through its Cliqbook product; Navitaire, Inc.; Sabre, Inc.'s, through its corporate booking product, "Get There."Travelocity for Business, TRX, Inc. through its Res-X product and Carlson Travel Group, Inc. through its Wagonlit Symphonie/Horizon product.

19



Hospitality and Leisure Services

Our Hospitality and Leisure Services group is comprised of Lodging.com, a leading online hotel booking site for consumers, and Neat Group, an online service that enables customers to design their own vacation packages. This group is responsible for obtaining hotel, tour, cruise and vacation rental inventory for distribution to consumers through our travel distribution subsidiaries. We areprovide major hotel chains with distribution, packaging and connectivity through a global providersingle point of electronic reservations processing, specialized reservationscontact. Travel suppliers can take advantage of distribution through our Travel Distribution segment's online and fulfillment services,off-line channels, as well as enhanced connectivity through Galileo, while providing Travel Distribution segment's channels with access to exclusive preferred rate content. We generate revenue from mark-ups on merchant travel inventory, as well as commissions on bookings from travel suppliers, including hotel, tour and computerized reservation system services forcruise companies.

Lodging.com provides consumers access to specially negotiated rates at more than 10,600 economy, mid-level and luxury hotels in markets around the world. Lodging.com customers also have access to Galileo's entire published hotel rate inventory, and can book vacation packages through Neat Group's packaging engine on the Lodging.com site. With a network of nearly 4,300 distribution affiliates, Lodging.com also offers hoteliers access and control over their pricing and yield management.

Neat Group develops, markets and operates dynamic packaging technology that enables customers to choose among a broad collection of discounted air, car and hotel offerings to create customized travel packages, which can provide savings of up to 50% versus purchasing the travel industryitems separately. Neat vacation packages are sold through our WizCom, TRUST Internationalapproximately 3,000 travel agencies and THOR subsidiaries. We acquired TRUST Internationalapproximately 34 affiliates. The acquisition of Neat Group, which took place in July 2002. This acquisitionMay 2003, was not material to Cendant.us.

Growth.    We intend to continue to add international hotels and form enterprise agreements with major hotel chains, while adding their content to our distribution channels. We intend to expand Neat dynamic packaging to international markets, add additional distributors and expand and enhance its content. We intend to continue to distribute our Lodging.com and Neat technology and content throughout other Travel Distribution segment's channels. The addition of Lodging.com content to the Neat packaging

20



engine is one of several strategies that are designed to sell more high-margin, Travel Distribution segment's content through affiliated channels.

Competition.    Lodging.com and Neat compete with companies with Internet travel web sites, such as Orbitz, Inc., InterActiveCorp's Expedia, Inc., Hotels.com L.P. and Hotwire.com businesses, Travelocity.com L.P. and Priceline.com Incorporated, in addition to off-line consolidators and tour companies, such as The Mark Travel Corporation, National Leisure Group, Inc. and Classic Custom Vacations, a division of Expedia, Inc.

Supplier Services

Our Supplier Services Business focuses on enhancing our relationships with our travel suppliers to pursue and obtain the most competitive and comprehensive rates for our Travel Distribution segment's channels. We also provide our travel suppliers with reservation-related systems and marketing information processing services that make their operations more efficient and enhance their revenue generation. We generate revenue from transaction fees and service fees paid to us by travel suppliers for our products and services.

WizCom provides hotel and TRUST International provide hotels, car rental businesses and tour/leisure travel operators, including Internet travel companies,suppliers with electronic distribution and e-commerce solutions for Internet, GDS and other travel reservation systems. Offering the industry's first switching service, WizCom provides hotel and car rental suppliers with direct connectivity to the Global DistributionInternet and to global distribution systems, as well as provides central GDS information management services.

TRUST International develops and implements central reservation systems (CRS) through its Voyager CRS, providing customized, real-time reservations and global distribution services to the hospitality industry. TRUST also provides a range of telecommunication services from its global communication call centers in Frankfurt (headquarters), Orlando, Florida and Singapore, which serve approximately 38 countries in 10 languages.

Shepherd Systems (such as our Galileo GDS), Internet or otherprovides sales and marketing intelligence technologies and services to approximately 45 of the world's leading airlines and travel reservations systems, linking customersagencies to allstrengthen their ability to make strategic decisions and help drive better business results. Shepherd also distributes Marketing Information Data Tapes (MIDT) on behalf of Galileo.

Our GlobalFares system provides fare quotation services for approximately 20 airlines worldwide. In 2003, we upgraded the major travel networks on six continents through telephone linesGlobalFares system to provide fully automated fare and satellite communications. These products allow for real timerule processing for travel agents, corporate travel departments and consumers. In addition, WizCom and TRUST International offer information management services that permit customers to maintain current information on property, vehicle or tour packages (such as rental rates and room amenity descriptions) and deliver the most current data to external distribution systems.

THOR provides 24-hour travel reservation assistance to customers of its travel agency clients, assisting approximately 140,000 travelers annually. THOR also provides its travel agency clients with directories that include information regarding numerous hotel properties.

Revenues are generated from services providedprivate fares filed by our Hospitality and Leisure Services Business to its customers, which combined include nearly all 200 major hotel chains, and primarily consist of up-front implementation fees and ongoing transaction and support fees.airlines.

Growth.    To increase revenue, weWe intend to increase our Internet distribution reach, allowing hotel and car rental companies to further optimize their sales mix and enhance our product and service portfolio aimed at the hospitality sector. For example, Trust International has major enhancements plannedWe intend to promote new products to meet our clients' needs, such as Hotel Cache, which offers hotel companies a cost effective solution to the high volume of rate requests from Internet-based systems, and JumpStart, our newly developed cost-effective interface for its hotel reservation system, Trust Voyager, which was initially launched in June 2002. WizCom hasInternet distribution systems. We are also launched a program that enables hotelsfocused on enhancing our data analysis capabilities and developing consulting services related to reduce rate description management resources.MIDT. We intend to expand Shepherd Systems' client reach beyond the airline industry to the entire travel sector.

Competition.    In providing electronic distribution services to hotel customers, we compete with third party connectivity providers and also with supplier direct connection technology. Wetechnology providers. WizCom and TRUST International compete with many companies tothat provide computerized reservation system services to hotel customers, including other hotels that develop their own proprietary systems. Some of ourOur competitors include Pegasus Solutions, Inc., Unirez Inc., Utell Limited and Lexington Services, part of My Travel Group, plc.

Airline Services

Our Airline Services business focuses on enhancing our relationship with our airline suppliers in order to pursue and obtain the most comprehensive airline rate information for our distribution channels, including travel agencies. Through ourowned by VIP International Corporation. Shepherd Systems business, our Airline Services business provides airline clients with Marketing Information Data Tapes ("MIDT") which provide GDS bookings and airline reporting and sales information. Revenue is derived from fees charged for MIDT.

Growth.    We are focused on enhancing our data analysis capabilities and developing consulting services related to MIDT. We intend to expand our client base to the entire travel sector.

Competition.    OurSystems' competitors include providers of market and business intelligence information, primarily in the airline industry. Our principal competitors includeindustry such as Sabre, Inc. and Lufthansa Systems.

Retail Travel Services

We provide travel services, through our travel agency subsidiaries Cendant Travel, Inc., Cheap Tickets, Inc. and RCI Travel, LLC. We are a full service travel agency operation providing airline, car rental, hotel and other travel reservation and fulfillment services. Such services are provided in connection with the travel programs offered through Trilegiant Corporation, an independent affiliate of Cendant and the outsource provider for our individual membership business, and Trip Network, Inc., an independent affiliate of

2021



Cendant and the operator of the Cheaptickets.com and Trip.com travel Web sites. Services are also provided to members of our RCI timeshare exchange business. We also market hotel accommodations through our Lodging.com subsidiary.

We work directly with travel suppliers, such as airlines, car rental companies, hotel companies and tour and cruise operators to secure both non-published and regularly available fares, rates and tariffs to supply the best possible rates and discounted travel to our customers. Cheap Tickets' non-published fares are not available to consumers directly from the airlines. Rates are made available to customers through our call centers and through our branded Web sites, cheaptickets.com and trip.com, which are operated by Trip Network, Inc. See "Relationship with Trip Network, Inc." discussion below. Transactions are booked primarily through our Galileo GDS and fulfilled through our call center network and ticketing operations. We maintain a total of seven call centers located in: Lakeport, California; Colorado Springs, Denver-Aurora and Denver-Englewood, Colorado; Honolulu, Hawaii; Moore, Oklahoma and Nashville, Tennessee.

On August 12, 2002, we acquired Lodging.com, which allows consumers to book special discount hotel accommodations online in approximately 4,000 economy and luxury hotels and gain access to special promotions by participating hotels. Lodging.com also permits consumers to book flights, reserve rental cars and book other hotel accommodations through its Web site. In the fourth quarter of 2002, Lodging.com began accessing the Galileo GDS as its provider of published hotel rate inventory. We derive revenue from commissions on bookings from hotel and car rental companies, airlines, cruise lines, tour operators and GDS companies as well as mark-ups on travel inventory.

Competition.    We compete with a large number of leisure travel agencies, including Liberty Travel, Inc. and American Express Travel Related Services Company, Inc., and companies with Internet travel Web sites, such as Orbitz, LLC, Expedia, Inc., Travelocity.com L.P., Priceline.com Incorporated, Hotels.com, L.P. and Hotwire.

Relationship with Trip Network, Inc.    Trip Network, Inc. ("TNI") was established in 2001 to develop and launch an Internet travel portal initiative, and is expected to significantly expand the Internet presence of our travel brands for the benefit of certain of our current and future franchisees. TNI was established with a $20 million contribution of assets by us in return for all of the common stock and preferred stock of Trip Network. We transferred all the common shares of Trip Network to an independent technology trust that is controlled by three independent trustees who are not officers, directors or employees of Cendant or relatives of officers, directors or employees of Cendant. The preferred stock is convertible into approximately 80% of TNI's common stock beginning on March 31, 2003 or earlier upon a change of control of TNI. Additionally, we also funded TNI in the first quarter of 2001 with approximately $85 million, including $45 million in cash and 1.5 million shares of Homestore common stock, then valued at $34 million. Following our acquisitions of Galileo and Cheap Tickets, TNI licensed the rights for the online businesses, Trip.com and Cheaptickets.com, respectively, which combined provide access to 29 million registered users. TNI currently operates these online travel businesses and we provide TNI with call center, supplier relationship management, GDS and fulfillment services. TNI launched the Trip.com Web site on April 29, 2002. Cheap Tickets relaunched its Web site in November 2002 to include the services provided by the Galileo GDS and Trip.com's technology platform.

At December 31, 2002, TNI had no debt outstanding nor are we contingently liable for any debt which TNI may incur. Certain officers of Cendant serve on the Board of Directors of TNI.

We are currently engaged in discussions with the trustees of the independent technology trust to negotiate our acquisition of the common stock of Trip Network.

Travel Distribution Trademarks and Intellectual Property

The trademarks and service marks "Galileo," "Apollo," "Cheap Tickets," "Trip.com," "WizCom," "Lodging.com," "THOR," "Highwire," "Lodging.com""Travelport" and related trademarks and logos are material to the businesses in our travel distributionTravel Distribution segment. Galileo and our other subsidiaries in the Travel Distribution

21



Segment segment and their licensees actively use these marks. All of the material marks used by these companies are registered (or have applications pending for registration) with the United States Patent and Trademark Office as well as major countries throughout the world where these businesses operate. We own the material marks used in the travel distributionTravel Distribution segment.

We also use a combination of patent, copyright, trade secret, confidentiality procedures and contractual provisions to protect the software, business processes and other proprietary information we use to conduct the businesses in our Travel Distribution segment. These assets and the related intellectual property rights are important assets of the businesses in our Travel Distribution segment. Unauthorized use of our intellectual property could have a material adverse effect on our Travel Distribution segment and there can be no assurance that our legal remedies would adequately compensate us for the damage caused by such use.

Travel Distribution Seasonality

We experience a seasonal pattern in our operating results, with the first and fourth quarters typically having lower total revenues and operating income compared to the second and third quarters due to decreased travel during the winter months.

Travel Distribution Employees

The businesses that make up our Travel Distribution segment employed approximately 5,3004,700 people as of December 31, 2002.2003.

VEHICLE SERVICES SEGMENT(30% (32%, 39%30% and 5%39% of revenue for 2003, 2002 2001 and 2000,2001, respectively)

With our purchase on November 22, 2002 of substantially all of the domestic assets of the Budget® vehicle rental business, as well as selected international operations, theOur Vehicle Services Segment nowsegment consists of the vehicle rental operations business of Avis and Budget, the Avis and Budget franchise systems and our commercial fleet management business. As a result, we believe that we

Vehicle Rental Operations and Franchise Businesses (24%, 20% and 25% of revenue for 2003, 2002 and 2001, respectively)

We are one of the largest carvehicle rental operators in the world.world under two leading brands, Avis and Budget. We plan to operate Avis and Budget separately,as separate brands, with separate advertising, Web sites, reservation numbers, counters, busesdifferentiated images, service and other customer facing elements.pricing. Avis targets customers who are willing to pay for premium service while Budget focuses on providing a value rental experience. Certain administrative functions such as fleet planning and treasury, as well as vehicle reservation and rental systems, will beare provided by Cendant for the benefit of both Avis and Budget.

Car Rental Operations and Franchise BusinessesAvis(19% (14%, 24%, 5%19% and 25% of revenue for 2003, 2002 2001 and 2000, respectively)

Avis(18%, 24%, 5% of revenue for 2002, 2001, and 2000, respectively)

We operate and/or franchise portions of the Avis car rental system (the "Avis System"), which represents one of the largest car rental brandssystems in the world, based on total revenue and number of locations. The Avis System is comprisedWe operate and/or franchise approximately 1,800 of the approximately 4,800 rental locations (of which 1,778 are operated and/or franchised by us),that comprise the Avis System, including locations at somemost of the largest airports and cities in the United States and foreign countries. internationally. The Avis System in Europe, Africa, part of Asia and the Middle East is operated under a

22


franchise arrangement with Avis Europe Ltd., an independent third party, and is comprised of approximately 3,000 locations.

We own and operate 964approximately 982 Avis car rental locations in both airport and non-airport (downtown and suburban) locations in the United States, Canada, Puerto Rico, the U.S. Virgin Islands, Argentina, Australia and New Zealand. For 2002,2003, our Avis car rental operations had an average fleet of approximately 219,000209,500 vehicles and generated total vehicle rental revenue of approximately $2.5$2.6 billion, of which 90%87% (or $2.25$2.26 billion) was derived from U.S. operations.

We also In addition, we franchise the Avis System to individualindependent business owners in approximately 814820 locations including locations in the United States, Canada, Latin America, Central America, South America and the Asia Pacific region. Approximately 94.9%95% of our Avis System rental revenue in the United States is generated by locations operatedowned by us or operated for us under agency arrangements, withand the remainder is generated by locations operated by independent franchisees. Independent franchisees pay fees based either on total time and mileage charges or total revenue. The Avis System in Europe, Africa, part of Asia

In addition to fees from car rentals and the Middle East is operated under franchise by Avis Europe Ltd.franchisee royalties, we generate revenue through optional products and services such as supplemental equipment (child seats and ski racks), an independent third party.loss damage waivers, additional liability insurance, personal accident insurance, personal effects protection and fuel option and service charges.

The Avis System providesWe provide franchisees and our corporate locations access to the benefits of a variety of services, including: (i) a standardized system identity for rental location presentation and uniforms; (ii) a training program, business policies, quality of service standards and data designed to monitor service commitment levels; (iii) marketing/advertising/public relations support, forwhich includes a national consumer promotions including the avis.com site; (iv) brandadvertising campaign to generate awareness of the Avis System through our familiar "We Try Harder®Harder" tagline; (iv) one of the leading rental car web sites, avis.com; (v) "Avis Cares," advertisinga program which includes providing customers with area-specific driver safety information, the latest child safety seats (available for rent) and (v) the "Avis Cares®" driverdriving maps; (vi) a counter by-pass program, Avis Preferred Service, which is available at top airport locations; and travel safety program.(vii) Avis Access, a full range of special products and services for physically-challenged drivers and passengers. Avis System locations have access to the Wizard®Wizard System, an online computer system which provides (i) global reservations

22



processing, (ii) rental agreement generation and administration and (iii) fleet accounting and control. Franchisees pay a fee for the use of the Wizard System. We also offer Avis InterActive®,InterActive, which provides corporate customers real-time access to aggregated information on car rental expenses to better manage their car rental expenditures.

Growth.    The existing rental patterns of our business cause us to have excess capacity from Friday through Sunday. We intend to increase business during this period through a combination of advertising, targeted marketing programs to associations and customers of other Cendant brands and increased presence in the online arena. Our own Internet site, avis.com, as well as other Internet travel sites, including the cheaptickets. com Web site, present good opportunities to grow our business and improve our profitability through enhanced utilization of our fleet. We also intend to continue to grow our revenue within the corporate sector through normal contract negotiations and by seeking clients that may be affected by fleet constraints of certain of our competitors.

Marketing.    In 2002,2003, approximately 75%73% of vehicle rental transactions generated from our owned and operated car rental locations were generated in the United States by travelers who used therented with Avis System under contracts between the CompanyAvis and the travelers' employers or organizations of which they are membersthrough membership in an organization with whom Avis has an affiliation (such as AARP)AARP and USAA). Our franchisees also have the option to participate in these contracts. Unaffiliated business and leisure travelers a segment that contributed to our growth in 2002, are solicited by direct mail telesalespromotions and advertising campaigns.

Customers can make Avis reservations through the Avis toll-free reservation center at 1-888-777-AVIS, via our Avis web site atwww.avis.com, through online portals or by contacting their travel agent. Travel agents can makeaccess Avis System reservations by telephone, via our Avis Web site, or through all major global distribution systems, and online travel portals, and can obtain access through these systemsinformation with respect to our rental locations, vehicle availability and applicable rate structures.structures through these systems. An automated link between these systems and the Wizard System gives them the ability to reserve and confirm rentals directly through these systems.directly. We also maintain strong links to the travel industry. We have arrangements withAvis offers customers the ability to earn frequent traveler programs ofpoints with virtually all the major airlines such asincluding Delta Air Lines, Inc., American Airlines, Inc., Continental Airlines, Inc. and United Air Lines, Inc., Avis is also affiliated with TripRewards, our recently launched loyalty marketing program and with the frequent traveler programs of various hotels including the Hilton Hotels Corporation, Hyatt Corporation, Best Western International, Inc., and Starwood Hotels and Resorts Worldwide, Inc. These arrangements provide various incentives to all program participants and cooperative

23



marketing opportunities for Avis and the partner. We also have an arrangement with our lodging brands whereby lodging customers who are making reservations by telephone may be transferred to Avis if they desire to rent a vehicle. In addition, through partnerships with American Express, MBNA Corporation and Sears, Roebuck and Co., we are able to provide their customers with incentives to rent from Avis.

Internationally, we utilize a multi-faceted approach to sales and marketing throughout our global network by employing or contracting with teams of trained and qualified account executives to negotiate contracts with major corporate accounts and leisure and travel industry partners. In addition, we utilize centralized telemarketinga wide range of marketing and direct mail initiatives to continuously broaden our customer base. Sales efforts are designed to secure customer commitment and support customer requirements for both domestic and international car rental needs. Our international operations maintain close relationships with the travel industry including participation in several airline frequent flyer programs, such as those operated by Air Canada and Qantas as well as participation in Avis Europe programs with British Airways, Lufthansa and other carriers.

Avis.com.    Avis has a strong brand presence on the Internet through our Web site, www.avis.com. A steadily increasing number of Avis vehicle rental customers obtain rate, location and fleet information and then reserve their Avis rentals directly on the avis.com Web site. During 2002, reservations through Internet sources increased to 13.8% of total reservations from 9.5% in the prior year for our owned operations.

23


Budget( (10% and 1% of revenue for 2002)2003 and 2002, respectively)

We purchased substantially all of the operatingdomestic assets and selected international operations of the Budget®Budget vehicle rental system (the "Budget System") on November 22, 2002 for $109 million (excluding transaction costs and expenses), plus the assumption and refinancing of approximately $2.4 billion in non-recourse vehicle debt.2002.

Budget Rent A Car System Inc. is one of the largest car and truck rental systems in the world, based on total revenue and number of locations. TheWe operate and/or franchise 1,987 of the approximately 2,900 rental locations that comprise the Budget System, is comprised of approximately 3,240 rental locations, including locations at somemost of the largest airports and cities in the United States and foreign countries.internationally. The rental locations that we do not operate or franchise are located in Europe, Africa, and the Middle East and are operated under a royalty-free franchise by Zodiac Europe Limited, an independent third party. We operate 729approximately 625 Budget car rental locations in both airport and non-airport (downtown and suburban) locations in the United States, Canada, Puerto Rico, Australia and New Zealand.Zealand and our Budget car rental operations generated total vehicle rental revenue of $1.24 billion, of which 93% (or $1.15 billion) was derived from U.S. operations. For the period of November 22 through December 31, 2002,2003, our Budget car rental operations had an average fleet of approximately 84,000 vehicles103,000 vehicles. We also franchise the Budget System to independent business owners in approximately 1,362 locations including locations in the United States, Canada, Latin America, the Caribbean and the Asia Pacific region. Approximately 86.1% of our Budget System rental revenues in the United States are generated total vehicleby locations owned by us or operated for us under agency arrangements, with the remainder generated by locations operated by independent franchisees. Independent franchisees generally pay fees based on gross rental revenue of approximately $121.5 million, of which 93% (or $112.5 million) was derived from U.S. operations.revenue.

We also operate a combined truck rental fleet of approximately 34,00030,000 trucks through a network of approximately 3,300 corporate owned,2,500 corporate-owned, dealer and franchised locations throughout the continental United States. Our truck rental business serves both the consumer and light commercial sectors. The consumer sector primarily serves individuals who rent trucks to move household goods on either a one-way or local basis. The light commercial sector serves a wide range of businesses that rent light- to medium-duty trucks, which arewe define as trucks having a gross vehicle weight of less than 26,000 pounds, for a variety of commercial applications.

We also franchise the Budget System to individual business owners in approximately 2,511 locations including locations in the United States, Canada, Latin America, Central America, South America and the Pacific region. Approximately 81.1% of our Budget System rental revenues in the United States are generated by locations operated by us or under agency arrangements, with the remainder generated by locations operated by independent franchisees. Independent franchisees pay fees based on gross rental revenue. The Budget System in Europe, Africa, and the Middle East is operated under franchise by BRAC Rent a Car Corporation, an independent third party.

Growth.    Budget has a variety of sources for growth in both the business and leisure sectors. For business travel, we intend to utilize an extensive and expanded direct salesforce to negotiate contracts with major corporate accounts and companies in the travel industry with whom we have relationships. In addition to fees from car and truck rentals and franchisee royalties, we will utilize telemarketinggenerate revenue through optional products and direct marketing programs to solicit small business accounts and independent business travelers. In leisure travel, where Budget has historical strength, we will continue to use a combination of retail advertising, strong value pricing, and joint promotions with companies with whom we have relationships in the travel industry,services such as Southwest Airlines,supplemental equipment (child seats and online travel portalsski racks, with respect to increase the volume of Budget leisure business. Our own internet site, budget.com, as well as other Cendant businesses such as Cendant Travel, also offer channels for growth. Cross promotionscar rentals, and hand trucks, packaging materials and furniture pads, with Cendant hotel brands, whose cost-conscious customers are good candidates for Budget's products, will be developedrespect to truck rentals), loss damage waivers, supplemental liability insurance, personal accident and expanded.effects insurance, fuel option and service charges.

24



Marketing

Marketing.Car Rental.    In 2002,connection with its focus on leisure travelers, Budget primarily uses retail advertising and value pricing were the drivers ofto drive improved results on budget.comits web site, in the reservation center, and in other leisure channels. In addition, proprietary marketing programs such as Fastbreak®,Fastbreak, a counter bypass program for frequent travelers, and Unlimited Budget, a travel agent rewards program, drovedrive increased revenues.

Budget also launched a small business program, the "Budget Means Business" Program, in 2003. Understanding the constraints of small business customers, the Budget Means Business Program focuses primarily on offering a value proposition. In addition, Budget continued to build its affiliated base of customers through relationships with various entities like Costco and with travel partners like Southwest Airlines and TripRewards, our recently launched loyalty program.

Customers can make Budget reservations through the Budget toll-free reservation center at 1-800-BUDGET7, via our Budget web site atwww.budget.com, through online travel portals, or through their travel agent. Travel agents can makeaccess Budget System reservations by telephone, via our Budget Web site, or through all major global distribution systems and can obtain access through these systemsinformation with respect to our rental location,locations, vehicle availability and applicable rate structures. An automated link between these systems and Maestro, Budget's on-line reservation system, gives them the ability to reserve and confirm rentals directlystructures through these systems throughsystems. In addition, Budget offers Unlimited Budget,sm, a loyalty incentive program for travel agents. Participating travel agents earn reward pointscash for every eligible U. S.U.S. business and leisure rental completed by their clients. As of December 31, 2002, 77,0002003, approximately 80,000 travel agents were enrolled in this program.

24



Budget.com.Truck Rental.    Budget primarily advertises in the yellow pages to promote its trucks to potential customers. Customers can make truck reservations through the Budget truck toll-free reservation center at 1-800-BUDGET2, via our Budget truck web site atwww.budgettruck.com or by calling a location directly. In addition, Budget has established online affiliations with web sites like monstermoving.com to reach its targeted audience.

Vehicle Rental Growth.    For 2003, we generated 83.9% and 75.7% of our Avis and Budget revenue, respectively, from our owned airport locations. We intend to increase business at existing off-airport locations through a combination of advertising, promotions, local sales calls and targeted marketing to members of various associations and corporations. We also intend to open new off-airport locations through relationships with major retailers. Avis formalized a partnership with Sears in October 2002 and since then has established 54 Avis locations at Sears stores. In connection with its nonexclusive arrangements with Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. and The Pep Boys—Manny, Moe & Jack, Budget intends to expand its off-airport reach and has begun to establish Budget locations at such stores. We also intend to increase our focus on Budget's truck business by upgrading the truck fleet and improving utilization.

Web Sites.    Avis and Budget have strong brand presence on the Internet through its Web site, www.budget.com.their web sites, avis.com and budget.com. A steadily increasing number of Avis and Budget vehicle rental customers obtain rate, location and fleet information and then reserve their Budget rentals directly on the budget.com Web site.these web sites. In addition, weboth Avis and Budget have agreements to promote ourtheir car rental serviceservices with major Internet portals, including, America Online, priceline.com, Southwest Airlines and Yahoo.have a strong advertising presence on Yahoo! During 2002,2003, reservations through Internet sources increased to 16.8%18.3% and 30.3% of total reservations from 11.4%14.7% and 25.9% in the prior year for Avis and Budget owned operations.operations, respectively.

CarVehicle Rental Fleet Management.    With respect to the car rental operations owned and operated by us, we participate in a variety of vehicle purchase programs with major domestic and foreign manufacturers. Our featurefeatured supplier for the Avis brand is General Motors Corporation. Our featurefeatured supplier for the Budget brand is Ford Motor Company. Under the terms of our agreements with GM and Ford, which expire in 2006 and 2007, respectively, we are required to purchase a certain number of vehicles from these manufacturers. Our current operating strategy is to maintain an average fleet age of approximately sixfive months. For model year 2002,2003, approximately 95%99% of our domestic fleet vehicles were subject to repurchase

25



programs. Under these programs, subject to certain conditions, such as mileage and vehicle condition, a manufacturer is required to repurchase those vehicles at a pre-negotiated price thereby eliminatingreducing our risk on the resale of the vehicles. In 2002,2003, approximately 3%2.3% of repurchase program vehicles did not meet the conditions for repurchase.

CarVehicle Rental Airport Rental Concession Fees.    In general, concession fees for airport locations are based on a percentage of total commissionable revenues (as determined by each airport authority), subject to minimum annual guaranteeguaranteed amounts. Concessions are typically awarded by airport authorities every three to five years based upon competitive bids. Our concession agreements with the various airport authorities generally impose certain minimum operating requirements, provide for relocation in the event of future construction and provide for abatement of the minimum annual guarantee in the event of extended low passenger volume.

CarVehicle Rental Competition.    The vehicle rental industry is characterized by intense price and service competition. In any given location, we and our franchisees may encounter competition from national, regional and local companies, many of which have greater resources than the Avis and Budget systems.companies. Nationally, ourAvis' principal competitor is The Hertz Corporation however, weand Budget's principal competitors are Alamo Rent-A-Car, LLC and Dollar Rent-A-Car System, Inc. However, both Avis and Budget also compete with each of these companies and with National Car Rental System, Inc., Alamo Rent-A-Car, LLC, Dollar Rent A Car System, Inc., Thrifty Rent-A-Car System, IncInc. and Enterprise Rent-A-Car Company. In addition, we compete with a large number of regional and local smaller vehicle rental companies throughout the country.

Competition in the U.S. vehicle rental operations business is based primarily upon price, reliability, national distribution, usability of booking systems, ease of rental and return and other elements of customer service. In addition, competition is influenced strongly by advertising and marketing.

Commercial Fleet Management Services Business(11% (8%, 10% and 15%14% of revenue for 2003, 2002 and 2001, respectively)

Through our acquisition of Avis Group Holdings in March 2001, we acquired a portion of the fleet management business we had previously sold to Avis in June 1999. As a result, we generated no revenue in this business in 2000. PHH Vehicle Management Services LLC (d/b/a PHH Arval),Arval, the second largest provider of outsourced commercial fleet management services in North America, and Wright Express, LLC, the largest proprietary fleet card service provider in the United States, comprisecompose our fleet management services business.

We provide corporate clients and government agencies the following services and products for which we are generally paid a monthly fee:

25


26



Growth.    We intend to focus our efforts for growth on the large fleet segment and middle market fleets as well as fee basedfee-based services to new and existing clients. We also intend to increase the cross marketing of products offered by Wright Express has also made a substantial investment in its technology to aggressively pursue new business opportunities both in the United States and PHH Arval to our customers.internationally.

Competition.The principal factors for competition in vehicle management services are service, quality and price. We are competitively positioned as a fully integrated provider of fleet management services with a broad range of product offerings. Among providers of outsourced fleet management services, we rank second in North America in the number of leased vehicles under management and first in the number of proprietary fuel and maintenance cards for fleet use in circulation. There are four other major providers of comprehensive outsourced fleet management servicesOur competitors in the United States include GE Capital Fleet Services, Wheels Inc., Automotive Resources International (ARI), Lease Plan International and CitiCapital, hundreds of local and regional competitors, andincluding numerous competitors who focus on one or two products. In the United States, it is

26



estimated that only 52%59% of fleets are leased by third-party providers. The unpenetrated demand and the continued focus by corporations on cost efficiency and outsourcing willis expected to provide the growth platformopportunities in the future.

Discontinued Operation

27


Parking Facility Business.    On May 22, 2002, we announced that we had completed the sale of our National Car Parks subsidiary, a private parking operator in the United Kingdom, for total consideration of $1.2 billion in cash.

Vehicle Services Trademarks and Intellectual Property

The service marks "Avis" and "Budget", related marks incorporating the words "Avis" or "Budget", and related logos are material to our car rental business.Vehicle Rental Operations and Franchise Businesses. Our subsidiaries and franchisees, actively use these marks. All of the material marks used in the Avis and Budget businesses are registered (or have applications pending for registration) with the United States Patent and Trademark Office as well as major countries worldwide where Avis and Budget franchises are in operation. We own the marks used in the Avis and Budget businesses. The service marks "Wright Express," "WEX," "PHH" and related trademarks and logos are material to our commercial fleet management services business. Wright Express, PHH Arval and their licensees actively use these marks. All of the material marks used by Wright Express and PHH Arval are registered (or have applications pending for registration) with the United States Patent and Trademark Office. All of the material marks used by PHH Arval are also registered in major countries throughout the world where the fleet management services are offered by Arval PHH. We own the marks used in Wright Express' and PHH Arval's business.

Vehicle Services Seasonality

For our Avis and Budget vehicle rental businesses, the third quarter of the year, which covers the summer vacation period, represents the peak season for vehicle rentals. Any occurrence that disrupts travel patterns during the summer period could have a greater adverse effect on Avis' and Budget's annual performance than in other periods. The fourth quarter is generally the weakest financial quarter for the Avis and Budget systems. In 20022003 our average monthly Avis rental fleet, excluding franchisees, ranged from a low of approximately 194,000195,000 vehicles in JanuaryDecember to a high of approximately 248,000234,000 vehicles in July. For the periodIn 2003, our average monthly Budget car rental fleet, excluding franchisees, ranged from a low of November 22 throughapproximately 84,000 vehicles in December 31, 2002, Budget operated an average fleetto a high of 84,000 vehicles.approximately 124,000 vehicles in July. Rental utilization for Avis, which is based on the number of hours vehicles are rented compared to the total number of hours vehicles are available for rental, ranged from 66.1%65.8% in December to 82.1%82% in August and averaged 73.9%73.4% for all of 2002.2003. Rental utilization for Budget, which is based on the number of days vehicles are rented compared to the total number of days vehicles are available for rental, was 76.3%ranged from 84.8% in August to 74.0% in December and averaged 80.8% for the periodall of November 22 through December 31, 2002.2003.

TheOur commercial fleet management services businesses arebusiness is generally not seasonal.

Vehicle Services Employees

The businesses that make up our Vehicle Services segment employed approximately 33,00032,700 people as of December 31, 2002.2003.

FINANCIAL SERVICES SEGMENT(9% (8%, 15%9% and 32%16% of our revenue for 2003, 2002 2001 and 2000,2001, respectively)

Insurance/WholesaleLoyalty/Insurance Marketing Business(3%2%, 4%3% and 10%5% of our revenue for 2003, 2002 2001 and 2000,2001, respectively)

Our insurance/wholesale businessLoyalty/Insurance Marketing Business provides (i) enhancement packages for financial institutions and marketing for accidental death and dismemberment insurance and certain other insurance products through our Progeny Marketing Innovations Inc. subsidiary and (ii) marketing for long term care insurance products

27



through our Long Term Preferred Care, Inc. subsidiary. With approximately 3840.5 million customers, we offer the following products and services:

Enhancement Package Service.We sell enhancement packages for financial institution consumer and business checking and deposit account holders primarily through our Progeny subsidiary. Progeny's financial institution clients select a customized package of our products and services and then usually add their own services (such as unlimited check writing privileges, personalized checks, cashiers' or travelers' checks without issue charge, or discounts on safe deposit box charges or installment loan interest rates). With our marketing and promotional assistance, the financial institution then offers the complete package of enhancements to its checking account holders as a special program for a monthly fee. Most of these

28



financial institutions choose a standard enhancement package, which generally includes $10,000 of accidental death and dismemberment insurance and travel discounts. Other enhancements may include Trilegiant'sour shopping and credit card registration services, a travel newsletter or pharmacy, eyewear or entertainment discounts. The common carrier coverage is underwritten under group insurance policies with two referralthird-party underwriters. We generally charge a financial institution client an initial fee to implement this program and monthly fees thereafter based on the number of customer accounts participating in that financial institution's program.

AD&D Insurance.Through our Progeny subsidiary, we serve as an agent and third-party administrator for marketing accidental death and dismemberment insurance throughout the country to the customers of financial institutions. Progeny's insurance products and other services are offered primarily to customers of banks, credit unions, credit card issuers and mortgage companies. These products are primarily marketed through direct mail solicitations and telemarketing which generally offer $1,000 of accidental death and dismemberment insurance at no cost to the customers and the opportunity to choose additional coverage of up to $250,000. The annual premium generally ranges from $10 to $250 and we derive revenue primarily from commissions based on premiums received bypursuant to agreements with the insurance carriers that issue the policies we market. Progeny also acts as an administrator for, and markets, term life and hospital accident insurance. Progeny'sinsurance as well as a number of other insurance products and other services are offered primarily to customers of banks, credit unions, credit card issuers and mortgage companies.Progeny is currently testing.

Long Term Care Insurance.    ThroughIn June 2003, our LTPCLong Term Preferred Care subsidiary we are one ofdiscontinued the largest independent marketersmarketing and sale of long term care insurance products in the United States representing six national underwriters. LTPC's sales efforts are supported by over 300 captive agents and 1,165 brokers across the United States.policies. We continue to derive revenue primarily from commissions based on premiums received bypursuant to agreements with the insurance carriers that issueissued the policies we market.sold. Our decision to discontinue the marketing and sale of long term care insurance policies was driven by changes in the long term care insurance market and our initiative to concentrate on core businesses. Even prior to discontinuing the marketing and sale of long term care insurance, the revenues derived from this business were immaterial. Although LTPC discontinued such marketing and sales activities, LTPC continues to provide customer service and related services to the existing block of insurance policies and policyholders.

Distribution Channels.We market our products to consumers:consumers (i) of financial institutions or other associations through direct marketing; (ii) of financial institutions or other associations through a direct sales force, participating merchants or general advertising; and (iii) through companies and various other entities.

Growth.Primary growth drivers include expanding our customer base to include largera greater number of financial institutions and targeted non-financial partners. In addition, we are expanding the array of insurance products and services sold through the direct marketing channels to existing clients.

Competition.Our checking account enhancement packages and services compete with similar services offered by other companies, including insurance companies and other third-party marketers.marketers such as Sisk Company, Generations Gold and Econ-O-Check Corporation. In larger financial institutions, we may also compete with a financial institution's owninternal marketing staff. Competition for the offering of our insurance products through financial institutions is growing and intense. Our competitors include other third-party marketers and large national insurance companies with established reputations that offer products with rates, benefits and compensation similar to ours. The long term care insurance industry is highly competitive. Our competition primarily includes large national insurance companies, such as General Electric Financial Assurance Company.

28



Loyalty Solutions Business (1%, 1% and 4%2% of our revenue for 2003, 2002 2001 and 2000,2001, respectively)

Our Cims subsidiary operates our loyalty solutions businessLoyalty Solutions Business and develops customer loyalty solutions and insurance products for the benefit of financial institutions and businesses in other industries. The primary customer loyalty solution offered to Cims clients is the loyalty package. Loyalty packages provide targeted consumers of client organizations with a "package" of benefits and services for the purpose of improving customer retention, attracting consumers to become customers of the client organization and encouraging them to buy additional services. For example, packages include discounted travel services such as discounts

29


on vacation rentals, car rentals, travel insurance, timeshare weeks, cruises, hotels and airlines. As of December 31, 2002,2003, Cims has expanded its clients' membership and customer base to approximately 16.318.9 million individuals. Cims clients include over 50 financial institutions throughout Europe, South Africa and Asia. Cims offers travel and real estate benefits and other services within its loyalty packages for the benefit of consumers. Cims also leveragesuses its internal insurance competencies and strategic relationships to provide insurance benefits to consumers. Cims derives fees from its financial institution and other corporate clients for its loyalty packages.

Growth.The primary growth drivers for Cims are (i) to increase the number of consumers, from within our existing client base, who participate in loyalty programs for their particular financial institution, (ii) to increase the number of financial institutions we partner with for their respective loyalty marketing programs, (iii) to develop marketing relationships with clients in other industries (wireless providers for example) and (iv) to offer multiple loyalty solutions to our clients.

Competition.Cims represents an outsourcing alternative to marketing departments of large retail organizations. Cims competes with certain other niche loyalty solution providers throughout Europe and internal marketing groups of large financial institutions.

Tax Preparation Business(1%, 1% and 1% of our revenue for 2003, 2002 2001 and 2000,2001, respectively)

Our Jackson Hewitt Inc. subsidiary ("Jackson Hewitt") is the second largest tax preparation service system in the United States. TheIn 2003, the Jackson Hewitt®Hewitt franchise system is comprisedconsisted of a 48-state network (and the District of Columbia) with over 4,1004,200 offices operating under the trade name and service mark "Jackson Hewitt Tax Service®.Service." Office locations range from stand-alone store front offices to kiosk offices within Wal-Mart, Kmart Corporation, Simon Malls and General Growth Malls and other retail stores. Through the use of proprietary interactive tax preparation software, wefranchisees are engaged in the preparation and electronic filing of federal and state individual income tax returns. During 2002,2003, the Jackson Hewitt system prepared over 2.52.8 million tax returns, which represented an increase of 13% from the approximately 2.2 million tax returns prepared during 2001.2002. To complement our tax preparation services, weour franchisees also offer accelerated check refunds, assisted direct deposits, refund anticipation loans and derivativerelated financial products to our tax preparation customers through designated banks, as well as Gold Guarantee®,Guarantee, our enhanced warranty product. In 2003, Jackson Hewitt launched a MasterCard branded stored-value card, the Jackson Hewitt CashCardsmwhich provides customers a convenient newan additional payment option.option to conveniently receive their tax-related funds. Franchisees pay an initial franchise fee andas well as royalty and marketing fees.

Through our Tax Services of America subsidiary we operated over 650 tax preparation offices in 2003 preparing over 350,000 tax returns through these offices.

Growth.We believe growth in the tax preparation industry will come primarily from organic growth in franchised and corporate-owned offices, selling new franchises, the application of proven management techniques, and continued growth in new product and service offerings.

During 1999, Jackson Hewitt, in conjunction with two of its largest franchisees, created an independent joint venture, Tax Services of America, Inc. ("TSA"), We also intend to maximize Jackson Hewitt's abilitycontinue to addacquire independent tax preparation firms to its franchise system. Jackson Hewitt initially contributed approximately 80 company-owned stores and as of December 31, 2001 had an approximate 89% interest in the form of preferred stock. The two other parties to the joint venture contributed a total of 40 stores in exchange for common stock in TSA. On January 18, 2002, Jackson Hewitt purchased all of the then outstanding common stock of TSA for approximately $4.0 million. During 2002, TSA prepared over 300,000 returns. TSA currently has over 500 offices and is expected to prepare over 400,000 tax returns in 2003. TSA's objective is to grow organically and by acquiring independent tax preparation firms in areas where TSA is licensed to operate and convert them to the Jackson Hewitt system.

29



Competition.    TaxThe tax preparation businesses areindustry is highly competitive. There are a substantial number of tax preparation firms and accounting firms that offer tax preparation services. Commercial tax preparers areThe industry is highly competitive with regard to price, service and reputation for quality. Our largest competitor, H&R Block, is a nationwide tax preparation service with approximatelymore than 9,000 locations. As a result of H&R Block's shift to an owner/operator business model, Jackson Hewitt has become the leading franchisor of tax preparation services.

Individual Membership Business(4%, 9%4% and 17%8% of our revenue for 2003, 2002 2001 and 2000,2001, respectively)

TheTrilegiant Transaction.    On January 30, 2004, we terminated Trilegiant's right to market membership businessprograms that we had previously licensed to Trilegiant Corporation in July 2001, terminated our license of the Trilegiant trademark and terminated our outsourcing arrangement whereby Trilegiant provided membership fulfillment services to our members. We will therefore be responsible for providing fulfillment services to our members. In connection with this transaction, we have hired substantially all Trilegiant

30



employees, agreed to service Trilegiant's members and made a $13 million cash payment to Trilegiant as consideration for the early termination of the rights referred to above. Trilegiant has now changed its name to TRL Group, Inc. and we have renamed one of our subsidiaries Trilegiant Corporation. In connection with such transaction, we also acquired Trilegiant Loyalty Solutions, Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of TRL Group, for $20 million in cash. Trilegiant Loyalty Solutions offers wholesale loyalty enhancement services primarily to credit card issuers who make such services available to their credit card holders to foster increased product usage and loyalty and will serve as the administrator of our points database for our TripRewards Loyalty Program. We continue to own preferred stock of TRL Group, which is currently convertible, at any time at our option, into approximately 43% of TRL Group common stock (taken together with the shares of common stock currently held by us). As a result of this transaction, we now have managerial control of TRL Group through our majority representation on the TRL Group Board of Directors.

Our Individual Membership Business markets various clubs and services to individuals through client proprietary lists (suchjoint marketing arrangements with various institutions such as banks, financial institutions, retailers, oil companies and internetInternet service providers) forproviders. For a membership fee.

On July 2, 2001,fee, we entered into an agreement with Trilegiant Corporation where we retained substantially all of the assets and liabilities of the existing membership business and licensed Trilegiant the right to market products utilizing our intellectual property to new members. Similar to our other franchise businesses, we receive a royalty from Trilegiant on all future revenue generated by any new member of Trilegiant. For the 40 year term of the license agreement, the royalty fee on revenues generated by the new members will initially be 5% and increase to approximately 16% over ten years. In addition, we continue to be obligated to provide membership benefits to our existing members as of July 2, 2001 and have entered into an arrangement with Trilegiant whereby Trilegiant provides all of the membership fulfillment services to our existing members for a fee. As a result, we continue to receive membership fees from our existing members.

As of December 31, 2002, Trilegiant had serviced approximately 21.2 million memberships, 11.4 million of which consist of our existing memberships. Trilegiant provides members with access to a variety of discounted products and servicesservices. Our programs offer consumers discounts on many brand categories along with shop-at-home convenience in such areas as retail shopping,merchandise, travel, personal finance and autoautomotive and home improvement. Trilegiant also affiliates with business partners such as leading financial institutions, retailers, and oil companies to offer membership as an enhancement to their credit card, charge card or other customers. Participating institutions generally receive commissions on initial and renewal memberships, based on a percentage of the net membership fees. IndividualWe also provide our products to such institutions on a wholesale or resale basis upon request. As of January 31, 2004, we serviced approximately 18.5 million memberships, approximately 8.3 million of which consist of our memberships and 10.2 million consist of members that we service on behalf of TRL Group.

We offer a variety of membership programs, offer consumers discounts on many brand categories by providing shop at home convenience in areas such as retail shopping, travel, automotive and home improvement.

Trilegiant offers the following membership programs from which we receive a royalty on sales to new members, including:including Shoppers Advantage®,Advantage, a discount shopping program; Travelers Advantage®,Advantage, a discount travel service program; The AutoVantage® Service,AutoVantage, a program which offers preferred prices on new cars and discounts on maintenance, tires and parts; AutoVantage Gold®,Gold, a program which provides a premium version of the AutoVantage® Service;AutoVantage service; Credit Card Guardian®Guardian and "Hot-Line",Hot-Line, services which enable consumers to register their credit and debit cards to keep the account numbers securely in one place; The PrivacyGuard®PrivacyGuard and Credentials®,Credentials, services which provide monitoring of a member's credit history and access to driving records and medical files; The Buyers Advantage®,Advantage, a service which extends manufacturer's warranties; CompleteHome®,CompleteHome, a service designed to save members time and money in maintaining and improving their homes; The Family FunSaver Club®,Club, a program which provides the opportunity to purchase family travel services and other family related products at a discount; and The HealthSaver,sm, a program which provides discounts on prescription drugs, eyewear, eye care, dental care, selected health-related services and fitness equipment.

Investment in Trilegiant.Growth.        We own preferred stock which is currently convertible, at any time atPrimary growth drivers include expanding our option, into approximately 32%customer base to include a greater number of Trilegiant's common stock. In July 2001, we advanced approximately $100 million in cashfinancial institutions and $33 million of prepaid assets to support Trilegiant's marketing activities.targeted non-financial partners. In addition, we have provided Trilegiant with a $35 million revolving line of credit under which advances are at our sole and unilateral discretion. At December 31, 2002, there were no advances outstanding under this line of credit. We are not obligated or contingently liable for any debt incurred by Trilegiant.

30



In connection with marketing agreements entered into with a third party, we provided a $75 million loan facility to a subsidiary of Trilegiant under which we advanced funds to Trilegiant for marketing performed by Trilegiant on behalf ofexpanding the third party. Under the terms of the agreements, Trilegiant will provide certain services to the third party in exchange for commissions. As partarray of our royalty arrangement with Trilegiant, we will participate in those commissions. Trilegiant will repay borrowings under this facility as commissions are received by Trilegiant fromproducts and services sold through the third party. As of December 31, 2002, the outstanding balance under this loan facility was $57 million.

All of Trilegiant's common stock is owned by the executives and senior management of Trilegiant, many of whom are former employees of our individual membership business. Certain of our officers serve on the Board of Directors of Trilegiantdirect marketing channels to oversee our interest in Trilegiant.existing clients.

Competition.The membership services industry is highly competitive. Competitors include membership services companies, such as MemberWorks Incorporated, as well as large retailers, travel agencies, insurance companies and financial service institutions, some of which have financial resources, product availability, technological capabilities or customer bases that may be greater than ours.

Financial Services Trademarks and Other Intellectual Property.Property

The service marks "Jackson Hewitt" and "Jackson Hewitt Tax Service" and related marks and logos are material to Jackson Hewitt's business. We throughtogether with our franchisees actively use these marks. The trademarks and logos are registered (or have applications pending for registration) with the United States Patent and Trademark Office. We own the marks used in the Jackson Hewitt business. The service mark "Progeny Marketing Innovations" and its associated logo is material to Progeny's business. Progeny

31


actively uses this mark for which an application is pending for registrationregistered in the United States Patent and Trademark Office. The individual membership businessIndividual Membership Business trademarks and service marks listed above and related logos, together with the "Trilegiant" trademark, are material to the individual membership business. In connection with the Trilegiant outsourcing arrangement, we license the individual membership business trademarksIndividual Membership Business. The "Trilegiant" trademark and service marks listed above to Trilegiant in exchange for the licensing fee mentioned above. Individual membership businessMembership Business trademarks and logos are registered (or have applications pending for registration) with the United States Patent and Trademark Office, unless otherwise indicated above.Office. We own the material marks used in the individual membership business.Individual Membership Business.

Financial Services Seasonality.

Our direct marketing and individual membership businesses are generally not seasonal. However, since substantiallySubstantially all of ourJackson Hewitt franchisees' customers file their tax returns during the period from January through April of each year, substantiallyyear. As a result, nearly all Jackson Hewitt franchise royalties are received during the first and second quarters, of each year. As a result,and Jackson Hewitt operates at a loss for the remainder of the year. Historically, suchThese losses primarily reflect payroll of year-round personnel, the update of tax software and other costs and expenses relating to preparation for the followingsubsequent tax season. The other businesses in our Financial Services segment generally are not seasonal.

Financial Services Employees

The businesses that make up our Financial Services segment employed approximately 2,8005,500 people as of December 31, 2002.2003. In connection with the Trilegiant transaction, we hired approximately 1,930 employees on January 30, 2004.

GEOGRAPHIC SEGMENTS

Financial data for geographic segments are reported in Note 29—27—Segment Information to our Consolidated Financial Statements included in Item 8 of this Form 10-K.

31


REGULATION

Franchise Regulation.The sale of franchises is regulated by various state laws, as well as by the Federal Trade Commission (the "FTC"). The FTC requires that franchisors make extensive disclosure to prospective franchisees but does not require registration. Although no assurance can be given, proposed changes in the FTC's franchise rule should have no adverse impact on our franchised businesses. A number of states require registration or disclosure in connection with franchise offers and sales. In addition, several states have "franchise relationship laws" or "business opportunity laws" that limit the ability of the franchisor to terminate franchise agreements or to withhold consent to the renewal or transfer of these agreements. While our franchising operations have not been materially adversely affected by such existing regulation, we cannot predict the effect of any future federal or state legislation or regulation. Our franchisors may engage in certain lending transactions common in their respective industries that provide loans to franchisees as part of the sale of the franchise. Such transactions may require the franchisor to register under state laws governing business lenders. We cannot predict the effect of the impact of those laws or any decision not to register under such laws and cease offering such loans.

Real Estate Regulation.The federal Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act ("RESPA") and state real estate brokerage laws restrict payments which real estate and mortgage brokers and other parties may receive or pay in connection with the sales of residences and referral of settlement services (e.g., mortgages, homeowners insurance, title insurance). Such laws may to some extent restrict preferred alliance and other arrangements involving our real estate brokerage franchisees, real estate brokerageReal Estate Brokerage Franchise, Real Estate Brokerage, Settlement Services, Mortgage and Relocation Businesses. Our title insurance operations mortgage businessare subject to numerous state laws and relocation business.regulations. Our mortgage businessMortgage Business is also subject to numerous federal, state and local laws and regulations, including those relating to real estate settlement procedures, fair lending, fair credit reporting, truth in lending, federal and state disclosure and licensing. Our Settlement Services businesses are subject to various federal and state regulations including those promulgated by state

32



departments of insurance and departments of corporations. Currently, there are local efforts in certain states, which could limit referral fees to our relocation business.Relocation Business.

In addition, to RESPA and similar state law restrictions on payments which may be received by real estate brokers in connection with the sale of residences and referral of settlement services, with respect to our real estate brokerage businessReal Estate Brokerage Business, RESPA and similar state laws require timely disclosure of the relationships or financial interests between providers of real estate settlement services. Our real estate brokerage businessReal Estate Brokerage Business is also subject to numerous federal, state and local laws and regulations that contain general standards for and prohibitions on the conduct of real estate brokers and sales associates, including those relating to licensing of brokers and sales associates, fiduciary and agency duties, administration of trust funds, collection of commissions, advertising and consumer disclosures. Under state law, our real estate brokers have the duty to supervise and are responsible for the conduct of their sales associates.

It is a common practice for online mortgage and real estate related companies to enter into advertising, marketing and distribution arrangements with other Internet companies and Web sites, whereby the mortgage and real estate related companies pay fees for advertising, marketing and distribution services and other goods and facilities. The applicability of RESPA's referral fee prohibitions to the compensation provisions of these arrangements is unclear and the Department of Housing and Urban Development has provided no guidance to date on the subject.brokerage business.

Timeshare Exchange Regulation.Our Timeshare Exchange Business, which includes RCI exchange programs and other exchange programs operated by our timeshare exchangesales and marketing business, is subject to foreign, federal, state and local laws and regulations including those relating to taxes, consumer credit, environmental protection and labor matters. In addition, we are subject to state statutes in those states regulating timeshare exchange services, and must prepare and file annually certain disclosure guides with regulators in states where required. While our timeshare exchange businessTimeshare Exchange Business is not subject to those state statutes governing the development of timeshare condominium unitsproperties and the sale of timeshare interests, such statutes directly affect both our timeshare salesTimeshare Sales and marketing businessMarketing Business (see below) and the other members and resorts that participate in the RCI exchange programs.programs and other exchange programs operated by our Timeshare Sales and Marketing Business. Therefore, the statutes indirectly impact our timeshare exchange business.Timeshare Exchange Business.

Timeshare Sales and Marketing Regulation.Our timeshare salesTimeshare Sales and marketingMarketing Business, which includes our resort management business, is subject to extensive regulation by the states and countries in which our resorts are located and in which its vacation ownership interests are marketed and sold. In addition, we are subject to federal legislation, including without limitation, the Federal Trade Commission Act;Act and rules promulgated by the Federal Trade Commission thereunder, including the federal Telemarketing Sales Rule with its Do Not Call provisions; the Fair Housing Act; the Truth-in-Lending Act and Regulation Z promulgated thereunder, which require certain disclosures to borrowers regarding the terms of their loans; the Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act and Regulation X promulgated thereunder

32



which require certain disclosures to borrowers regarding the settlement and servicing of loans; the Equal Credit Opportunity Act and Regulation B promulgated thereunder, which prohibit discrimination in the extension of credit on the basis of age, race, color, sex, religion, marital status, national origin, receipt of public assistance or the exercise of any right under the Consumer Credit Protection Act, the Telemarketing and Fraud and Abuse Prevention Act; the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act and the Fair Credit Reporting Act, which address privacy of consumer financial information; and the Civil Rights Acts of 1964, 1968 and 1991. In Australia, we are regulated by the Australian Securities and Investments Commission.

Many states have laws and regulations regarding the sale of vacation ownership interests. The laws of most states require a designated state authority to approve a timeshare public report, a detailed offering statement describing the resort operator and all material aspects of the resort and the sale of vacation ownership interests. In addition, the laws of most states in which we sell vacation ownership interests grant the purchaser of such an interest the right to rescind a contract of purchase at any time within a statutory rescission period, which generally ranges from three to ten days. Furthermore, most states have other laws that regulate our timeshare sales and marketing activities, such as real estate licensing laws, travel sales licensing laws, anti-fraud laws, telemarketing laws, telephone solicitation laws including Do Not Call legislation and restrictions on the use of predictive dialers, prize, gift and sweepstakes laws, labor laws and various regulations governing access and use of our resorts by disabled persons.

Internet Regulation.Although our business units' operations on the Internet are not currently regulated by any government agency in the United States beyond regulations discussed above and applicable to

33


businesses generally, it is likely that a number of laws and regulations may be adopted governing the Internet. In addition, existing laws may be interpreted to apply to the Internet in ways not currently applied. Regulatory and legal requirements are subject to change and may become more restrictive, making our business units' compliance more difficult or expensive or otherwise restricting their ability to conduct their businesses as they are now conducted.

Vehicle Rental and Fleet Leasing Regulation.We are subject to federal, state and local laws and regulations including those relating to taxing and licensing of vehicles, franchising, consumer credit, environmental protection and labor matters. The principal environmental regulatory requirements applicable to our vehicle and rental operations relate to the ownership or use of tanks for the storage of petroleum products, such as gasoline, diesel fuel and waste oils; the treatment or discharge of waste waters; and the generation, storage, transportation and off-site treatment or disposal of solid or liquid wastes. We operate 467466 Avis and Budget locations at which petroleum products are stored in underground or abovegroundabove ground tanks. We have instituted an environmental compliance program designed to ensure that these tanks are in compliance with applicable technical and operational requirements, including the replacement and upgrade of underground tanks to comply with the December 1998 EPA upgrade mandate and periodic testing and leak monitoring of underground storage tanks. We believe that the locations where we currently operate are in compliance, in all material respects, with such regulatory requirements.

We may also be subject to requirements related to the remediation of, or the liability for remediation of, substances that have been released to the environment at properties owned or operated by us or at properties to which we send substances for treatment or disposal. Such remediation requirements may be imposed without regard to fault and liability for environmental remediation can be substantial.

We may be eligible for reimbursement or payment of remediation costs associated with future releases from its regulated underground storage tanks and have established funds to assist in the payment of remediation costs for releases from certain registered underground tanks. Subject to certain deductibles, the availability of funds, compliance status of the tanks and the nature of the release, these tank funds may be available to us for use in remediating future releases from itsour tank systems.

A traditional revenue source for the vehicle rental industry has been the sale of loss damage waivers, by which rental companies agree to relieve a customer from financial responsibility arising from vehicle damage incurred during the rental period. Approximately 3.4%5% of our vehicle operations revenue during 20022003 was generated by the sale of loss damage waivers. Approximately 40 states have considered legislation affecting the loss damage waivers. To date, 24 states have enacted legislation which requires disclosure to each customer at the time of rental that damage to the rented vehicle may be covered by the customer's

33



personal automobile insurance and that loss damage waivers may not be necessary. In addition, in the late 1980's, New York enacted legislation which eliminated our right to offer loss damage waivers for sale and limited potential customer liability to $100. Pursuant to new legislation effective February 24,in 2003, New York will permitpermits the sale of loss damage waivers at a capped rate of $9.00 per day for cars with an MSRP of less than $30,000based on the vehicle's manufacturer's suggested retail price. Nevada and $12.00 per day for cars with an MSRP of $30,000 or more. Moreover Nevada has capped ratesCalifornia have similar rules regarding fees for loss damage waivers at $15.00 per day. California has capped these rates at either $9.00 per day for cars with an MSRP of $19,000 or less, or $15.00 per day for cars with an MSRP of $19,000 to $34,999, but there is no cap for cars with an MSRP of $35,000 or more.waivers.

We are also subject to regulation under the insurance statutes, including insurance holding company statutes, of the jurisdictions in which itsour insurance company subsidiaries are domiciled. These regulations vary from state to state, but generally require insurance holding companies and insurers that are subsidiaries of insurance holding companies to register and file certain reports including information concerning their capital structure, ownership, financial condition and general business operations with the state regulatory authority, and require prior regulatory agency approval of changes in control of an insurer and intercorporate transfers of assets within the holding company structure. Such insurance statutes also require that we obtain limited licenses to sell optional insurance coverage to our customers at the time of rental.

34



The payment of dividends to us by our insurance company subsidiaries is restricted by government regulations in Colorado, Bermuda and Barbados affecting insurance companies domiciled in those jurisdictions.

Our vehicle rental and fleet leasing businesses could be liable for damages in connection with motor vehicle accidents under the theory of vicarious liability. Under this theory, companies that lease or rent motor vehicles may be subject to liability for the tortuous acts of their lessees/renters, even in situations where the leasing/rental company has not been negligent and there is no product defect involved.

Wright Express Financial Services Corporation is subject to a variety of state and federal laws and regulations applicable to FDIC-insured, state-chartered financial institutions.

Marketing Regulation.    Primarily through our insurance/wholesale business, we market ourThe products and services offered by our various businesses, including our Real Estate Brokerage, Timeshare Exchange, Timeshare Sales and Marketing, Loyalty/Insurance Marketing and Individual Membership Businesses, are marketed via a number of distribution channels, including direct mail, telemarketing and online. These channels are regulated on the state and federal levels and we believe that these activities will increasingly be subject to such regulation. Such regulation, including anti-fraud laws, consumer protection laws, privacy laws, telemarketing laws and telephone solicitation laws, may limit our ability to solicit new memberscustomers or to offer one or more products or services to existing members.customers. In addition to direct marketing, our insurance/wholesale businessLoyalty/Insurance Marketing Business is subject to various state and local regulations including, as applicable, those of state insurance departments. While we have not been materially adversely affected by existing regulations, we cannot predict the effect of any future foreign, federal, state or local legislation or regulation.

In November 1999, the Federal Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act became law. This Act and its implementing regulations modernized the regulatory structure affecting the delivery of financial services to consumers and provided for new requirements and limitations relating to direct marketing by financial institutions to their customers. Compliance with the Act was required beginning July 1, 2001, and we have taken various steps to ensure our compliance; however, since specific aspects of the implementing regulations relating to this Act remain to be clarified, it is unclear what conclusive effect, if any, such regulations might have on our business.

We are also aware of, and are actively monitoring the status of, certain proposed privacy-related state legislation that might be enacted in the future; it is unclear at this point what effect, if any, such state legislation might have on our businesses. A number of our businesses are significant users of email marketing to existing and prospective customers. It is unclear what effect, if any, legislation restricting such marketing practices would have on those businesses.

Some of our business units use sweepstakes and contests as part of their marketing and promotional programs. These activities are regulated primarily by state laws that require certain disclosures and providing certain assurances that the prizes will be available to the winners.

Global Distribution Services Regulation.Our global distribution servicesGDS business is subject to regulation primarily in the United States, the European Union ("EU") and Canada. EachHowever, each jurisdiction has announced plans to significantly reduce or eliminate the existing regulations as more fully discussed below.

Throughout 2003, each jurisdiction's rules arewere largely based on the same set of core premises: that a computerized reservation system must treat all participating airlines equally, whether or not they are owners of the system; that airlines owning computerized

34



reservations systems must not discriminate against the computerized reservation systems they do not own; and that computerized reservation system relationships with travel agencies should not be an impediment to competition from other computerized reservation systems or to the provision of services to the traveler. The U.S. and EU rules have the greatest impact on us because of the volume of business transacted by us in those jurisdictions. Neither jurisdiction currently seeks to regulate computerized reservation system relationships with non-airline participants, such as hotel and car rental companies, although the EU rules allow computerized reservation systems to incorporate rail services into their displays and such rail services are therefore subject to certain sections of the EU rules.

The rules in both the United States and the European Union include a non-discriminatory fee provision that requires all airlines to be charged the same fees for the same level of participation. The EU rules go further and require that fees must be reasonably structured and reasonably related to the cost of the service provided and used. The rules in both jurisdictions also regulate the terms of the contracts between the systems and travel agencies for use of the systems. In this regard, the EU rules include a provision relating to productivity pricing. Pursuant to this rule, any productivity benefits payable to a travel agency by a GDS for efficient use of the system must be based on ticketed segments.

Both the United States and European Union rules include a mandatory participation provision that requires the owner airlines to provide the same data and the same functionality to all GDS's and to accept and confirm bookings with equal timeliness in all GDS's. The rules in both jurisdictions also regulate the type of marketing data sold by the systems. Regulators in the United States, and the European Union, and Canada have announced proposed changes to the existing rules which would eliminate rules relating to mandatory participation and non-discriminatory pricing. Therules. On December 31, 2003, the United States also proposesDepartment of Transportation approved a new set of abbreviated rules effective January 31 through July 31, 2004. After July 31, 2004, all GDS rules in the U.S. are scheduled to terminate unless otherwise extended. The new rules in effect in the United States until July 31, 2004 primarily 1) continue the existing ban or severely limitupon display bias of flights made available to

35



travel agents by GDSs; 2) continue the paymentexisting ban on certain contract clauses in contracts between GDSs and airlines; and 3) continue the existing ban on discriminatory loading of productivity benefits to travel agencies by systems. Both jurisdictions also propose to modifydata into the regulations relating to the sale of marketing data. The proposed U.S. rule changes are subject to a comment period during which we intend to provide our views. GDS system.

The proposed EU rules have not yet been issued in draft form but are expected in 2004. The EU has advised that it is considering the first halfelimination of 2003. We havemany rules including the rules that require GDSs to treat all airlines and travel agents equally not only in terms of services offered but also with regard to fees charged. In addition, the EU has proposed the elimination of many rules relating to subscribers as well as the rule that requires an airline that owns a GDS to treat all GDSs equally. The Company has actively provided ourits views to the EU commission and planplans to comment on the draft rules when issued. If promulgated, as

On October 24, 2003, the Canadian government published a proposed revision of its GDS rules. The proposed revision eliminated several rules and modified several others. However, on February 9, 2004, Canada hosted an industry meeting to discuss whether GDS regulations were required any longer in view of the revisedderegulation of the GDS industry in the United States. The new rules, could adversely affect the operations of Galileo.if any, will not become effective until sometime in 2004.

Travel Agency Regulation.The products and services we provide are subject to various federal, state and local regulations. We must comply with laws and regulations relating to our sales and marketing activities, including those prohibiting unfair and deceptive advertising or practices. Our travel service is subject to laws governing the offer and/or sale of travel products and services, including laws requiring us to register as a "seller of travel," to comply with disclosure. In addition, many of our travel suppliers and global distribution systems are heavily regulated by the United States and other governments and we are indirectly affected by such regulationregulation.

EMPLOYEES

As of December 31, 2002,2003, we employed approximately 85,00087,000 people. We have approximately 6,500 U.S. employees and 700 international employees covered under collective bargaining arrangements. Management considers our employee relations to be satisfactory.satisfactory and does not anticipate any material interruptions to operations from labor disputes.

ITEM 2.    PROPERTIES

Our principal executive offices are located in leased space at 9 West 57th57th Street, New York, NY 10019 with a lease term expiring in 2013. Many of our general corporate functions are conducted at leased offices at One Campus Drive, 7 Sylvan Way, 6 Sylvan Way, 1 Sylvan Way and 10 Sylvan Way, Parsippany, New Jersey and one owned facility located at 6 Sylvan Way, Parsippany, New Jersey 07054. Executive offices are also located at Landmark House, Hammersmith Bridge Road, London, England W69EJ.

Real Estate Franchise Business.    Our Real Estate Franchise Business conducts its main operations at our leased offices at One Campus Drive in Parsippany, New Jersey. There are also leased facilities at regional offices located in Atlanta, Georgia, Mission Viejo, CA; Chicago, IL and Scottsdale, AZ.

Real Estate Brokerage Business.    Our real estate brokerage and settlement services businesses leaseReal Estate Brokerage Business leases over seven6.7 million square feet of domestic office space under 1,4691,293 leases. NRTIts corporate headquarters are located at 339 Jefferson Road, Parsippany, NJNew Jersey pursuant to a leaseleases expiring in 2005 and 2007. NRT leases approximately 3122 facilities under 33 leases serving as regional headquarters or large individual real estate offices; over 140headquarters; 71 facilities serving as location administration, training facilities or storage, and approximately 950955 offices under multipleapproximately 1,118 leases serving as

35



brokerage sales offices. These offices are generally located in shopping centers and small office parks, generally with lease terms not in excess of five years. In addition, there are 71 leases representing vacant office space, principally as a result of acquisition-related brokerage sales office consolidations.

Settlement Services Business.    Our lodging franchise businessSettlement Services Business conducts its main operations at a leased facility in Moorestown, New Jersey under a lease expiring in 2004 and has leased regional and branch offices in fourteen states.

36



Mortgage Business.    Our Mortgage Business has centralized its operations to one main area occupying various leased offices in Mt. Laurel, New Jersey for a total of approximately 900,000 square feet. The lease terms expire in 2004, 2006, 2008, 2013 and 2022. Our Mortgage Business has recently entered into a lease for a new building, also in the Mt. Laurel area, which is anticipated to be completed and occupied in 2004. The new lease expires in 2014. There is a second area of centralized offices in Jacksonville, Florida, where space is occupied pursuant to two leases expiring in 2005 and 2008. In addition, there are approximately 24 smaller regional offices located throughout the United States.

Relocation Business.    Our Relocation Business has its main corporate operations in two leased buildings in Danbury, Connecticut with lease terms expiring in 2004 and 2008. There are also five leased regional offices located in Mission Viejo and Walnut Creek, California; Chicago, Illinois; Irving, Texas and Bethesda, Maryland, which provide operation support services. Facilities referred to in the preceding sentence are pursuant to leases that expire in 2013, 2005, 2004, 2008 and 2005, respectively. International offices are located in Swindon and Hammersmith, United Kingdom; Melbourne and Sydney, Australia; Hong Kong and Singapore pursuant to leases that expire in 2012, 2017, 2005, 2005, 2004 and 2004, respectively.

Lodging Franchise Business.    Our Lodging Franchise Business leases space for its reservations centers and data warehouse in Aberdeen, South Dakota; Knoxville, Tennessee and St. John, New Brunswick, Canada pursuant to leases that expire in 2004, 2004,2007, and 20092013 respectively. In addition, our lodging and real estate businesses share approximately four leased office spaces within the United States.States and have one vacant property in Phoenix, Arizona with a lease expiring in 2007.

Timeshare Exchange Business.    Our timeshare exchange businessTimeshare Exchange Business has threesix properties which we own; a 200,000 square footown. The most significant owned properties for this business are call centercenters in Carmel, Indiana; a 200,000 square foot call center in Cork, Ireland and a call center located in Kettering, UK. Our timeshare exchange businessTimeshare Exchange Business also has approximately 10seven leased offices located within the United States and approximately 3843 additional leased spaces in various countries outside the United States.

Timeshare Sales and Marketing Business.    Our timeshare salesTimeshare Sales and marketing businessMarketing Business owns an 80,750 square foota facility in Redmond, Washington and leases space for call center and administrative functions in Syracuse, New York,York; Bellevue, Washington,Washington; Las Vegas, NevadaNevada; Margate, Florida and Orlando, Florida, pursuant to leases expiring in 2005, 2006, 20062007, 2010 and 2011,2012, respectively. In addition, approximately 90113 marketing and sales offices are leased throughout the United States.States and nine offices are leased internationally.

Vacation Home Rental Business.    Our vacation home rental businessVacation Home Rental Business operations are managed in two owned locations (Earby, England and Monterrigioni, Italy) and fourthree leased locations (Embsay, England; Leeds,(Leeds, England; Copenhagen, Denmark and Hamburg, Germany). The owned locations are comprised of 38,000 square feet and 1,200 square feet at Earby and Monterrigioni respectively. Our leased locations are comprised of 96,615 square feet and operate pursuant to leases that expire in 2003, 2004, 2005 and 2006, respectively. We intend to vacate the leased location expiring in 2004.

Travel Distribution Business.    Our relocationtravel distribution business has its main corporate operationsthree properties, which we own: a data center in two leased buildings in Danbury, Connecticut with lease terms expiring in 2005 and 2008. There are also five regional offices located in Mission Viejo and Walnut Creek, California; Chicago, Illinois; Irving, Texas and Bethesda, Maryland, which provide operation support services. We own theGreenwood, Colorado; a facility in Mission ViejoAtlanta, Georgia and operatea call center in Lakeport, California, which is currently vacant. Our travel distribution business also leases 16 additional facilities within the other facilities referred to in the preceding sentence pursuant to leasesUnited States that expire in 2005, 2004, 2003 and 2003, respectively. International offices are located in Swindon and Hammersmith, United Kingdom; Melbourne and Brisbane, Australia; Hong Kong and Singapore pursuant to leases that expire in 2017, 2012, 2005, 2003, 2003 and 2003, respectively.

Our mortgage business has centralized its operations to one main area occupying various leased offices in Mt. Laurel, New Jersey for a total of approximately 855,000 square feet. The lease terms expire over the next five years, with one lease expiring in 2022. Our mortgage business has recently entered into a lease for a new building which was completed and occupied in the beginning of 2003. The new lease is for 175,000 square feet and expires in 2013. Regionalfunction as call centers or fulfillment or sales offices, are locatedand 46 additional properties in Englewood, Colorado; Jacksonville, Floridavarious countries outside the United States, which function as administration, sales, call center and Santa Monica, California, pursuant tofulfillment offices. Our travel distribution businesses leases that expire in 2003, 2005have various expiration dates.

Vehicle Rental Operations and 2005, respectively.

Franchise Businesses.    Our vehicle servicesVehicle Services segment owns a 158,000 square foot facility in Virginia Beach, Virginia, which serves as a satellite administrative and reservations facility for Avisour car rental car operations. Office space is also leased in Lisle, Illinois; Orlando, FloridaFlorida; Redding, California; Denver, Colorado; Wichita Falls, Texas; Tulsa, Oklahoma; and Denver, Colorado pursuant to leases that expire in 2004, 2005, and 2007, respectively. Our vehicle services segment leases space for its car reservations at four locations in the United States and two locations inFedericton, Canada pursuant to leases expiring in 2005, 2011, 2007, 2010, 2006, and 2009, 2009,respectively. Budget offices at Carrollton, Texas and LeMoore, California have been recently closed and are therefore vacant. These spaces are subject to leases expiring in 2016 and 2010, 2010 and 2011.respectively. In addition, there are approximately 19 leased office locations in the United States.

37



We lease or have vehicle rental concessions for both the Avis and Budget brands at multiple locations throughout the world. Avis operates 729738 locations in the United States and 235244 locations outside the United States. Of those locations, 231233 in the United States and 7378 outside the United States are at airports. Budget operates at 565550 locations in the United States of which 138127 are at airports. Budget also operates at 11375 locations outside the United States. Typically, an airport receives a percentage of vehicle rental revenues, with a guaranteed minimum. Because there is a limit to the number of vehicle rental locations in an airport, vehicle rental companies frequently bid for the available locations, usually on the basis of the size of the guaranteed minimums.

36



Commercial Fleet Management Services Business.    PHH Arval leases office space and marketing centers in sevensix locations in the United States and Canada, with approximately 88,000 square feet in the aggregate.Canada. PHH Arval maintains a 200,000 square foot headquarters office in Hunt Valley, Maryland.Maryland pursuant to a lease expiring in the first quarter of 2004. At that time, these functions will be relocated to a new 210,000 square foot office in Sparks, Maryland, which has a lease expiring in 2014. In addition, Wright Express leases approximately 180,000 square feet of office space in two domestic locations.Portland, Maine and Salt Lake City, Utah, under leases expiring in 2006, 2007, 2008, 2012 and 2004.

Loyalty/Insurance Marketing Business.    Our insurance/wholesale businessLoyalty/Insurance Marketing Business leases fourthree domestic office spaces in Franklin, Tennessee with lease terms ending in 2003, 2006 and 2009. In addition, there are ten leased

Loyalty Solutions.    Our Loyalty Solutions Business leases 11 locations internationally that function as sales and administrative officeoffices for Cims with the main office locatedshared with our travel distribution business in Portsmouth, United Kingdom.Langley, England.

Tax Preparation Business.    Our tax preparation serviceTax Preparation Business leases a 27,000 square foot facility in Sarasota, Florida.

Individual Membership Business.    Our travel distribution business has three properties, which we own;Individual Membership Services Business leases 115,000 square feet in Norwalk, Connecticut under a 256,000 square foot datalease expiring in 2014. Administrative offices are located in Dublin, Ohio pursuant to a lease expiring in 2008 and call center functions are located in Greenwood, Colorado; a 32,000 square footan owned facility in Atlanta, GeorgiaCheyenne, WY and a 20,000 square footleased facility in Lakeport, California. The travel distribution business also leases 118,000 square feet of office spaceWesterville, OH with a lease expiring in Rosemont, Illinois; 233,000 square feet of office space among five locations2005. In addition, two offices are located in the Denver, Colorado area; 39,000 square feet of office space in Honolulu, Hawaii; approximately 18 additional properties within the United States and 45 leased spaces in various countries outside the United States.

Our travel operations have leased locations in Aurora, Colorado; Nashville, Tennessee and Moore, Oklahoma. They occupy a total of approximately 133,000 square feet pursuant toTrumbull, CT with leases expiring in 2006, 2006, and 2003, respectively.

Trust International operates in three locations for call2005 housing data center and technical support operations in Frankfurt, Germany, Singapore and Orlando, Florida. WizCom operates out of leased space in Garden City, New York.production center functions.

We believe that such properties are sufficient to meet our present needs and we do not anticipate any difficulty in securing additional space, as needed, on acceptable terms.

ITEM 3.    LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

After the April 15, 1998 announcement of the discovery of accounting irregularities in the former CUC business units, and prior to the date of this Annual Report on Form 10-K, approximately 70 lawsuits claiming to be class actions and other proceedings were commenced against us and other defendants.

In re Cendant Corporation Litigation, Master File No. 98-1664 (WHW) (D.N.J.) (the "Securities Action"), is a consolidated class action consisting of over sixty constituent class action lawsuits. The Securities Action is brought on behalf of all persons who acquired securities of the Company and CUC, except our PRIDES securities, between May 31, 1995 and August 28, 1998. Named as defendants are the Company; twenty-eight current and former officers and directors of the Company, CUC and HFS; and Ernst & Young LLP, CUC's former independent accounting firm.

The Amended and Consolidated Class Action Complaint in the Securities Action alleges that, among other things, the lead plaintiffs and members of the class were damaged when they acquired securities of the Company and CUC because, as a result of accounting irregularities, the Company's and CUC's previously issued financial statements were materially false and misleading, and the allegedly false and misleading financial statements caused the prices of the Company's and CUC's securities to be inflated artificially. The Amended and Consolidated Complaint alleges violations of Sections 11, 12(a)(2), and 15 of

38



On December 7, 1999, we announced that we had reached an agreement to settle claims made by class members in the Securities Act of 1933 (the "Securities Act")Action for approximately $2.85 billion in cash. This settlement received all necessary court approvals and Sections 10(b), 14(a), 20(a), and 20A of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the "Exchange Act").was fully funded by us on May 24, 2002.

On January 25, 1999, the Company answered the Amended Consolidated Complaint and asserted Cross-Claimscross-claims against Ernst & Young alleging that Ernst & Young failed to follow professional standards to discover and recklessly disregarded the accounting irregularities, and is therefore liable to the Company for damages in unspecified amounts. The Cross-Claimscross-claims assert claims for breaches of Ernst & Young's audit agreements with the Company, negligence, breaches of fiduciary duty, fraud, and contribution.

37



On March 26, 1999, Ernst & Young filed Cross-Claimscross-claims against the Company and certain of the Company's present and former officers and directors, alleging that any failure to discover the accounting irregularities was caused by misrepresentations and omissions made to Ernst & Young in the course of its audits and other reviews of the Company's financial statements. Ernst & Young's Cross-Claimscross-claims assert claims for breach of contract, fraud, fraudulent inducement, negligent misrepresentation and contribution. Damages in unspecified amounts are sought for the costs to Ernst & Young associated with defending the various shareholder lawsuits and for harm to Ernst & Young's reputation.

On December 7, 1999, we announced that we had reached an agreement to settle claims made by class members in the Securities Action for approximately $2.85 billion in cash. This settlement has received all necessary court approvals and was fully funded by us on May 24, 2002 (see Note 17—Stockholder Litigation Settlement Liability to the Consolidated Financial Statements).

Welch & Forbes, Inc. v. Cendant Corp., et al., No. 98-2819 (WHW) (the "PRIDES Action"), is a consolidated class action filed on behalf of purchasers of the Company's PRIDES securities between February 24 and August 28, 1998. Named as defendants are the Company; Cendant Capital I, a statutory business trust formed by the Company to participate in the offering of PRIDES securities; seventeen current and former officers and directors of the Company, CUC and HFS; Ernst & Young; and the underwriters for the PRIDES offering, Merrill Lynch & Co.; Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated; and Chase Securities Inc.

The allegations in the Amended Consolidated Complaint in the PRIDES Action are substantially similar to those in the Securities Action. The PRIDES Action states claims under Sections 11, 12(a)(2) and 15 of the Securities Act and Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Exchange Act, and seeks damages in an unspecified amount. In January 2000, we announced a partial settlement of the PRIDES Action (see Note 22 to the Consolidated Financial Statements).

On March 17, 1999, we entered into an agreement to settle the claims of class members in the PRIDES Action who purchased PRIDES securities on or prior to April 15, 1998 ("eligible persons"). The settlement did not resolve claims based upon purchases of PRIDES after April 16, 1998 and, as of December 31, 2001, other than Welch & Forbes, Inc. v. Cendant Corp., et al., which is previously discussed, no purchasers of PRIDEPRIDES securities after April 16, 1998 have instituted proceedings against us. Pursuant to the settlement, we distributed more shares of our Common Stock than we otherwise would have under the terms of the original PRIDES.

Semerenko v. Cendant Corp., et al., Civ. Action No. 98-5384 (D.N.J.), andP. Schoenfield Asset Management LLC v. Cendant Corp., et al., Civ. Action No. 98-4734 (D.N.J.) (the "ABI Actions"), were initially commenced in October and November of 1998, respectively, on behalf of a putative class of persons who purchased securities of American Bankers Insurance Group, Inc. ("ABI") between January 27, 1998 and October 13, 1998. Named as defendants are the Company, four former CUC officers and directors and Ernst & Young. The complaints in the ABI actions, as amended on February 8, 1999, assert violations of Sections 10(b), 14(e) and 20(a) of the Exchange Act. The plaintiffs allege that they purchased shares of ABI common stock at prices artificially inflated by the accounting irregularities after we announced a cash tender offer for 51% of ABI's outstanding shares of common stock in January 1998. Plaintiffs also allege that after the disclosure of the accounting irregularities, we misstated our intention to complete the tender offer and a second step merger pursuant to which the remaining shares of ABI stock were to be acquired by us. Plaintiffs seek, among other things, unspecified compensatory damages. On April 30, 1999, the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey dismissed the complaints on motions of the defendants. In an opinion dated August 10, 2000, the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit vacated the District Court's judgment and remanded the ABI Actions for further proceedings. On December 15, 2000, we filed a motion to dismiss those claims based on ABI purchases after April 15, 1998, and the District Court granted this motion on May 7, 2001. The plaintiffs subsequently moved for leave to file a Second Amended Complaint to reallege claims based on ABI purchases between April 16, 1998 and October 13, 1998. That motion was denied on August 15, 2002.

3839



The settlements described herein do not encompass all litigation asserting claims against us associated with the accounting irregularities. We cannot give any assurance as to the final outcome or resolution of these unresolved proceedings. An adverse outcome from certain unresolved proceedings could be material with respect to earnings in any given reporting period. However, we do not believe that the impact of such unresolved proceedings should result in a material liability to us in relation to our consolidated financial position or liquidity.

In Re Homestore.com Securities Litigation, No. 10-CV-11115 (MJP) (U.S.D.C., C.D. Cal.). On November 15, 2002, Cendant and Richard A. Smith, one of our officers, were added as defendants in a purported class action. The 26 other defendants in such action include Homestore.com, Inc., certain of its officers and directors and its auditors. Such action was filed on behalf of persons who purchased stock of Homestore.com (an Internet-based provider of residential real estate listings) between January 1, 2000 and December 31, 2001. The complaint in this action alleges violations of Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities and Exchange Act based on purported misconduct in connection with the accounting of certain revenues in financial statements published by Homestore during the class period. On January 10, 2003, we, together with Mr. Smith, filed a motion to dismiss plaintiffs' claims for failure to state a claim upon which relief could be granted. A hearing onOn March 7, 2003, the court granted our motion to dismiss was held on Februaryand dismissed the complaint, as against us and Mr. Smith, with prejudice. On April 14, 2003, and at the conclusion thereof theplaintiffs filed a motion was submitted tofor an order certifying an issue for interlocutory appeal, which the court for determination.denied on July 11, 2003.

ITEM 4.    SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS

Not Applicable.None.

3940



PART II

ITEM 5.    MARKET FOR REGISTRANT'S COMMON EQUITY AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS

Market Price on Common Stock

Our common stock is listed on the New York Stock Exchange ("NYSE") under the symbol "CD". At January 29, 2003February 23, 2004, the number of stockholders of record was approximately 9,562.8,732. The following table sets forth the quarterly high and low sales prices per share of CD common stock as reported by the NYSE for 20022003 and 2001.2002.

2002

 High
 Low
First Quarter $19.99 $15.35
Second Quarter  19.03  15.15
Third Quarter  15.66  10.75
Fourth Quarter  12.88  9.04
2001

 High
 Low
First Quarter $14.760 $9.625
Second Quarter  20.370  13.890
Third Quarter  21.530  11.030
Fourth Quarter  19.810  12.040
2003

 High
 Low
First Quarter $13.95 $10.56
Second Quarter  18.39  12.67
Third Quarter  19.30  16.94
Fourth Quarter  22.30  18.37

2002


 

High


 

Low

First Quarter $19.99 $15.35
Second Quarter  19.03  15.15
Third Quarter  15.66  10.75
Fourth Quarter  12.88  9.04

On March 3, 2003,February 27, 2004, the last sale price of our CD common stock on the NYSE was $12.20$22.70 per share.

Dividend Policy

We expectwill pay a cash dividend on our common stock beginning on March 16, 2004 to retainholders of record as of February 23, 2004. The initial quarterly dividend of $0.07 per share was approved by our Board of Directors on February 11, 2004. Future dividends will depend upon our earnings, for the developmentfinancial condition and expansion of our businesses and the repayment of indebtedness and doother factors. We did not anticipate payingpay cash dividends on our common stock in the foreseeable future. However, we are currently analyzing the benefits of paying dividends in the futurefiscal years 2002 and may change this policy based on the results of our analysis.2003.

4041


ITEM 6.    SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA



 At or For the Year Ended
December 31,


 At or For the Year Ended
December 31,



 2002
 2001
 2000
 1999
 1998

 2003
 2002
 2001
 2000
 1999


 (In millions, except per share data)


 (In millions, except per share data)

Results of OperationsResults of Operations          Results of Operations          
Net revenuesNet revenues $14,088 $8,613 $4,320 $5,755 $6,364Net revenues $18,192 $14,187 $8,693 $4,320 $5,755
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Income (loss) from continuing operationsIncome (loss) from continuing operations $1,081 $342 $569 $(307)$114Income (loss) from continuing operations $1,465 $1,051 $342 $567 $(307)
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of taxIncome (loss) from discontinued operations, net of tax (205) 81 91 252 426Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of tax  (205) 81 91 252
Extraordinary losses on early extinguishment of debt, net of tax (30)  (2)  
Cumulative effect of accounting changes, net of taxCumulative effect of accounting changes, net of tax  (38) (56)  Cumulative effect of accounting changes, net of tax (293)  (38) (56) 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Net income (loss)Net income (loss) $846 $385 $602 $(55)$540Net income (loss) $1,172 $846 $385 $602 $(55)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Per Share DataPer Share Data          Per Share Data          
CD Common StockCD Common Stock          CD Common Stock          
Income (loss) from continuing operations:Income (loss) from continuing operations:          Income (loss) from continuing operations:          
Basic $1.44 $1.03 $0.37 $0.79 $(0.41)
Diluted 1.41 1.01 0.36 0.77 (0.41)
Income (loss) from discontinued operations:Income (loss) from discontinued operations:          
Basic $1.06 $0.37 $0.79 $(0.41)$0.13Basic $ $(0.20) $0.10 $0.13 $0.34
Diluted 1.04 0.36 0.77 (0.41) 0.13Diluted  (0.20) 0.09 0.12 0.34
Cumulative effect of accounting changes:Cumulative effect of accounting changes:          Cumulative effect of accounting changes:          
Basic $ $(0.05)$(0.08)$ $Basic $(0.29) $ $(0.05) $(0.08) $
Diluted  (0.04) (0.08)  Diluted (0.28)  (0.04) (0.08) 
Net income (loss):Net income (loss):          Net income (loss):          
Basic $0.83 $0.42 $0.84 $(0.07)$0.64Basic $1.15 $0.83 $0.42 $0.84 $(0.07)
Diluted 0.81 0.41 0.81 (0.07) 0.61Diluted 1.13 0.81 0.41 0.81 (0.07)
Financial PositionFinancial Position          
Financial Position

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
Total assetsTotal assets $35,897 $33,544 $15,153 $15,412 $20,230Total assets $39,037 $35,897 $33,544 $15,153 $15,412
Assets under management and mortgage programsAssets under management and mortgage programs 17,593 15,180 12,054 2,999 2,805
Total long-term debt, excluding Upper DECSTotal long-term debt, excluding Upper DECS 5,601 6,132 1,948 2,845 3,363Total long-term debt, excluding Upper DECS 5,139 5,601 6,132 1,948 2,845
Upper DECSUpper DECS 863 863   Upper DECS 863 863 863  
Assets under management and mortgage programs 15,008 11,868 2,861 2,726 7,512
Debt under management and mortgage programs 12,747 9,844 2,040 2,314 6,897
Debt under management and mortgage programs(*)Debt under management and mortgage programs(*) 14,785 12,747 9,844 2,040 2,314
Mandatorily redeemable preferred interest in a subsidiaryMandatorily redeemable preferred interest in a subsidiary 375 375 375  Mandatorily redeemable preferred interest in a subsidiary  375 375 375 
Mandatorily redeemable preferred securities issued by subsidiary holding solely senior debentures issued by the CompanyMandatorily redeemable preferred securities issued by subsidiary holding solely senior debentures issued by the Company   1,683 1,478 1,472Mandatorily redeemable preferred securities issued by subsidiary holding solely senior debentures issued by the Company    1,683 1,478
Stockholders' equityStockholders' equity 9,315 7,068 2,774 2,206 4,836Stockholders' equity 10,186 9,315 7,068 2,774 2,206

(*)
Includes related-party debt due to AESOP Funding II, LLC. See Note 16 to our Consolidated Financial Statements.

42


In presenting the financial data above in conformity with generalgenerally accepted accounting principles, we are required to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported. See "Critical Accounting Policies" under Item 7 included elsewhere herein for a detailed discussion of the accounting policies that we believe require subjective and complex judgments that could potentially affect reported results.

During 2003, we consolidated a number of entities pursuant to Financial Accounting Standards Board Interpretation No. 46R, "Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities," and/or as a result of amendments to the underlying structures of certain of the facilities we use to securitize assets. See Notes 4, 52, 16 and 717 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for more information.

See Note 10 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for a detailed discussionsdiscussion of gains and losses on dispositions of businesses, impairment of investmentsrestructuring and other unusual charges (credits) recorded for the years ended December 31, 2003, 2002 2001 and 2000.2001. During 2000 and 1999, we recorded restructuring and other unusual charges of $3,032$109 million ($1,921and $117 million, after tax or $2.56 per diluted share) primarilyrespectively. Additionally, in 1999 we recorded a charge of approximately $2.9 billion in connection with the settlement of our class action securities litigation. We also recorded net gains on the dispositions of businesses of $1,109 million ($879 million, after tax or $1.17 per diluted share)approximately $1.1 billion during 1999 primarily related to the disposition of our former fleet businesses. During 1998, we recorded other charges of $838 million ($545 million, after tax or $0.62 per diluted share) primarily associated with the termination of a proposed acquisition and the PRIDES litigation settlement.

During 2002 and 2001, we completed a number of acquisitions, which materially impacted our results of operations and financial position. See Note 34 to our Consolidated Financial Statements for a detailed discussion of such acquisitions and the pro forma impact thereof on our results of operations. Additionally, during 2002 we adopted the non-amortization provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards ("SFAS") No. 142, "Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets." Accordingly, our results of operations for 2001, 2000 1999 and 19981999 reflect the amortization of goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets, while our results of operations for 2003 and 2002 do not reflect such amortization. See Note 12—5—Intangible Assets to our Consolidated Financial Statements for a pro forma disclosure depicting our results of operations during 2001 and 2000 after applying the non-amortization provisions of SFAS No. 142.

Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of tax includes the after tax results of discontinued operations and the gain (loss) on disposal of discontinued operations. See Note 6Notes 1 and 3 to our Consolidated Financial Statements for detailed information regarding discontinued operations.

4143


ITEM 7.    MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

The following discussion should be read in conjunction with our Business Section and our Consolidated Financial Statements and accompanying Notes thereto included elsewhere herein. Unless otherwise noted, all dollar amounts are in millions and those relating to our results of operations are presented before taxes.

We are one of the foremost providers of travel and real estate services in the world. Our businesses provide a wide range of consumer and business services primarily in the travel and real estate services industries, which are intended to complement one another and create cross-marketing opportunities both within and among our business segments. We operate infollowing five business segments:segments.

Our management team is committed to building long-term value through an outsourcing arrangement with Trilegiant Corporation (as discussed furtheroperational excellence. Historically, a significant portion of our growth had been generated through strategic acquisitions of businesses that have strengthened our position in the section entitled "Liquiditytravel and Capital Resources—Affiliated Entities").

We seekreal estate services industries and furthered our strategy of building a hedged and diversified portfolio of businesses. Now that we have assembled our vertically integrated portfolio of businesses, we have sharply curtailed the pace of acquisitions and have emphasized organic growth and cash flow generation as principal objectives in revenuesachieving operational excellence and earnings by servingbuilding long-term value. In 2003, our customers, applyingspending on new acquisitions aggregated only $149 million in cash. Although we remain highly disciplined in our core competencies and managing our discretionary spending with a focus on return on investment. Suchacquisition activity, we may augment organic growth is expected to be augmented by, on athrough the select basis, the acquisition and integration of (or possible joint venture with) complementary businesses primarily in the real estate and travel services industries. We expect to fund the purchase price of which we intend to payany such acquisition with cash generated by our core operations throughout 2003.and/or available lines of credit. We also routinely review and evaluate our portfolio of existing businesses to determine if they continue to meet our currentgrowth objectives and, from time to time, engage in discussions concerning possible divestitures, joint ventures and related corporate transactions.transactions to redirect our portfolio of businesses to achieve company-wide objectives.

DuringWe are steadfast in our commitment to deploy our cash to increase shareholder value. To this end, in late 2002, we initiated a corporate debt reduction program with the goal of decreasing our outstanding corporate indebtedness by $2 billion. We completed a numberthe first phase of such transactions, as discussed below.

Acquisitions

On April 17, 2002,this program during first quarter 2003, which was to replace current maturities of corporate indebtedness with longer-term debt, and we acquired allare well into the second phase of the program where as of December 31, 2003 we have already reduced our outstanding common stockcorporate indebtedness by over $800 million. We further reduced our outstanding indebtedness by $430 million in February 2004 as a result of NRT Incorporated, the largest residential real estate brokerage firm in the United States, for $230 million, including $3 million of estimated transaction costs and expenses and $11 million related to the conversion of NRT employee stock appreciation rightsour zero coupon senior convertible notes. We intend to CD common stock options. The acquisition consideration was funded through an exchangeuse the cash that otherwise would have been used to redeem these notes to repurchase a corresponding number of 11.5 million shares of CD common stock then-valued at $216 million, which included approximately 1.5 million shares of CD common stock then-valued at $30 million in exchange for existing NRT options. As part of the acquisition, we also assumed approximately $320 million of NRT debt, which was subsequently repaid. Prior to the acquisition, NRT operated as a joint venture between us and Apollo Management, L.P. that acquired independent real estate brokerages, converted them to one of our real estate franchise brands and operated under the brand pursuant to two 50-year agreements. Management

42



believes that as a wholly-owned subsidiary, NRT will be a more efficient acquisition vehicle and achieve greater financial and operational synergies. NRT is a component of the Real Estate Services segment.

On April 30, 2002, we acquired approximately 90% of the outstanding common stock of Trendwest Resorts, Inc. for $804 million in our CD common stock (approximately 42.6 million shares) plus $20 million of estimated transaction costs and expenses and $25 million related to the conversion of Trendwest employee stock options into CD common stock options. As part of the acquisition, we assumed $89 million of Trendwest debt, of which $78 million was subsequently repaid. We purchased the remaining 10% of the outstanding Trendwest shares in a merger on June 3, 2002 for approximately 4.8 million shares of our CD common stock aggregating $87 million. Trendwest markets, sells and finances vacation ownership interests. Management believes that this acquisition will provide us with significant geographic diversification and global presence in the timeshare industry. Trendwest is now a component of our Hospitality segment.

On November 22, 2002, we acquired substantially all of the domestic assets of the vehicle rental business of Budget Group, Inc., as well as selected international operations, for approximately $109 million in cash plus $44 million of transaction costs and expenses. As part of the acquisition, we also assumed approximately $2.4 billion of Budget's asset-backed vehicle related debt, which was repaid with the proceeds from our subsequent issuance of $2.0 billion of asset-backed debt and approximately $400 million of borrowings under our $2.9 billion revolving credit facility. Management believes that Budget is a complementary fit with the other leisure travel services we provide through our hotel, timeshare, and travel distribution companies. Budget is now a component of our Vehicle Services segment.

Subsequent to our acquisition of NRT, we acquired 20 other residential real estate brokerage operations through NRT for approximately $399 million, including Arvida Realty Services for approximately $160 million and The DeWolfe Companies for approximately $146 million. The acquisition of real estate brokerages by NRT is a core part of its growth strategy.open market. We also acquired 17 other non-significant businesses during 2002 for aggregate consideration of approximately $582 million in cash, including (i) Equivest Finance, Inc.,plan to use call provisions and maturities wherever possible rather than paying a timeshare developer, for approximately $98 million; (ii) three European distribution partners ofsignificant premium to repurchase our Galileo subsidiary for approximately $125 million; (iii) Novasol AS, a marketer of privately owned vacation properties in Europe, for approximately $66 million and (iv) 12 other businesses for approximately $256 million primarily within our Hospitality and Travel Distribution segments. None of these acquisitions were significant to our results of operations or financial position individually or in the aggregate.

The following table summarizes the preliminary estimated fair values of net assets acquired and resultant goodwill recognized in connection with the above acquisitions:

 
 Assets
Acquired

 Liabilities
Assumed

 Net
Assets
Acquired

 Goodwill
NRT $2,317 $1,014 $1,303 $1,564
Trendwest  1,148  212  936  687
Budget  3,504  3,351  153  432
Other(*)  1,299  1,050  249  732

(*)
The goodwill resulting from the preliminary allocations of the purchase prices of these businesses aggregated $732 million, of which $241 million, $257 million, $157 million, $13 million and $64 million was allocated to the Real Estate Services, Hospitality, Travel Distribution, Vehicle Services and Financial Services segments, respectively.

The results of operations of businesses we acquired have been included in our consolidated results of operations since their respective dates of acquisition. In certain circumstances, the allocations of the excess purchase price are based upon preliminary estimates and assumptions. Accordingly, the allocations are subject to revision when we receive final information, including appraisals, and other analyses. Revisions to the fair values, which may be significant, will be recorded as further adjustments to the purchase price allocations. We are also in the process of integrating the operations of all our acquired businesses and expect to incur costs relating to such integrations. These costs may result from integrating operating

4344



systems, relocating employees, closing facilities, reducing duplicative effortsdebt in the open market. See "Liquidity and exitingCapital Resources—Financial Obligations" for more information regarding our corporate indebtedness. During 2003, we repurchased approximately 64.5 million shares of our common stock at an average price of $17.04 and consolidatingthrough February 27, 2004, we repurchased another 20.7 million shares of our common stock at an average price of $22.79. Beginning in first quarter 2004, we will return additional value to our shareholders through the payment of a quarterly cash dividend of seven cents per share (28 cents per share annually) and, while no assurances can be given, we expect to increase this dividend over time as our earnings and cash flow grow.

While the war in Iraq, SARS and other activities. These costs will be recorded onfactors dampened organic growth in our Consolidated Balance Sheetstravel-related businesses in 2003, we have demonstrated our ability to achieve organic earnings and cash flow growth for the company as adjustmentsa whole, particularly due to the purchase price or onstrong operating results within our Consolidated Statements of Income as expenses, as appropriate. Forreal estate services businesses, which benefited from greater mortgage loan refinancing activity and increased home sales volume across both our franchised and owned brokerage operations. Although no assurances can be given, we currently believe that a decrease in mortgage refinancing activity resulting from an expected rise in interest rates during 2004 should be more detailed information regarding the Budget, NRT and Trendwest acquisitions, see Note 3—Acquisitions tothan offset by organic growth in our Consolidated Financial Statements.

Dispositions

On May 22, 2002, we sold our NCP subsidiary for approximately $1.2 billion in cash. NCP operated car parking facilities within the United Kingdom and was a part of our Vehicle Services segment.other businesses. We recorded an after-tax loss of approximately $256 millionalso expect that organic growth will benefit in the second quarter of 2002 onfuture from our ongoing investment in technology and from cross-selling opportunities across the sale of this business principally related to foreign currency translation, as a result of the strengthening of the U.S. dollar against the U.K. pound since our acquisition of NCP in 1998 through the date of disposition. Such loss was recorded within the loss on disposal of discontinued operations, net of tax, line item. The account balances and activities of NCP have been segregated and reported as a discontinued operation for all periods presented herein, as required by generally accepted accounting principles.company.


CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES

In presenting our financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles, we are required to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported therein. Several of the estimates and assumptions we are required to make relate to matters that are inherently uncertain as they pertain to future events. However, events that are outside of our control cannot be predicted and, as such, they cannot be contemplated in evaluating such estimates and assumptions. If there is a significant unfavorable change to current conditions, it will likely result in a material adverse impact to our consolidated results of operations, financial position and liquidity. We believe that the estimates and assumptions we used when preparing our financial statements were the most appropriate at that time. Presented below are those accounting policies that we believe require subjective and complex judgments that could potentially affect reported results. However, the majority of our businesses operate in environments where we are paid a fee for a service performed, and therefore the results of the majority of our recurring operations are recorded in our financial statements using accounting policies that are not particularly subjective, nor complex.

Mortgage Servicing Rights.    A mortgage servicing right ("MSR") is the right to receive a portion of the interest coupon and fees collected from the mortgagor for performing specified mortgage servicing activities. The value of mortgage servicing rights is estimated based upon an internal valuation that reflects management's estimates of expected future cash flows considering prepayment estimates (developed using a third party model described below), our historical prepayment rates, portfolio characteristics, interest rates based on interest rate yield curves and other economic factors. More specifically, we incorporate an Option Adjusted Spread ("OAS") model to generate and discount cash flows for the MSR valuation. The OAS model generates numerous interest rate paths then calculates the MSR cash flow at each monthly point for each interest rate path and discounts those cash flows back to the current period. The MSR value is determined by averaging the discounted cash flows from each of the interest rate paths. The interest rate paths are generated with a random distribution centered around implied forward interest rates which are determined from the interest rate yield curve at any given point of time. As of December 31, 2002, the implied forward interest rates project an increase of approximately 50 basis points in the yield of the 10-year Treasury Note over the next 12 months. Changes in the yield curve will result in changes to the forward rates implied from that yield curve.

As noted above, a key assumption in our estimate of the MSR valuation are forecasted prepayments. We use a third party model, adjusted to reflect the historical prepayment behavior exhibited by our portfolio, to forecast prepayment rates at each monthly point for each interest rate path in the OAS model. The prepayment forecast is based on historical observations of prepayment behavior in similar periods of refinance incentive. The prepayment forecast incorporates loan characteristics (e.g., loan type and note rate) and factors such as recent prepayment experience, previous refinance opportunities and estimated

44



levels of home equity to determine the prepayment forecast at each monthly point for each interest rate path.

To the extent that fair value is less than carrying value, we would consider the portfolio to have been impaired and record a related charge. Reductions in interest rates different than those predicted in our models could cause us to use different assumptions in the MSR valuation, which could result in a decrease in the estimated fair value of our MSR asset, requiring a corresponding reduction in the carrying value of the asset. To mitigate this risk, we use derivatives that generally increase in value as interest rates decline and conversely decline in value as interest rates increase. Additionally, as interest rates are reduced, we have historically experienced a greater level of refinancings, which has historically mitigated the impact on earnings of the decline in our MSR asset.

Changes in the estimated fair value of the mortgage servicing rights based upon variations in the assumptions (e.g., future interest rate levels, prepayment speeds) cannot be extrapolated because the relationship of the change in assumption to the change in fair value may not be linear. Changes in one assumption may result in changes to another, which may magnify or counteract the fair value sensitivity analysis and would make such an analysis not meaningful. Additionally, further declines in interest rates due to a weakening economy and geopolitical risks, which result in an increase in refinancing activity or change in the methodology of valuing our MSR asset, could adversely impact the valuation. The carrying value of our MSR asset was approximately $1.4 billion as of December 31, 2002 and the total portfolio that we were servicing approximated $115.8 billion as of December 31, 2002 (refer to Note 14—Mortgage Servicing Activities to our Consolidated Financial Statements for a detailed discussion of the effect of any changes to the value of this asset during 2002 and 2001). The effects of any adverse potential changes in the estimated fair value of our MSR asset are detailed in Note 20—Transfers and Servicing of Financial Assets to our Consolidated Financial Statements.

Retained Interests from Securitizations.    We sell a significant portion of our residential mortgage loans and relocation and timeshare receivables as part of our overall financing and liquidity strategy. We retain the servicing rights and, in some instances, subordinated residual interests in the mortgage loans and relocation and timeshare receivables. With the exception of specific mortgage loans that are sold with recourse, the investors have no recourse to our other assets for failure of debtors to pay when due. Gains or losses relating to the assets securitized are allocated between such assets and the retained interests based on their relative fair values on the date of sale. We estimate fair value of the retained interests based upon the present value of expected future cash flows, which is subject to the prepayment risks, expected credit losses and interest rate risks of the sold financial assets.

Changes in the estimated fair value of the retained interests based upon variations in the assumptions (e.g., prepayment risks, expected credit losses and interest rate risks) cannot be extrapolated because the relationship of the change in assumption to the change in fair value may not be linear. Changes in one assumption may result in changes to another, which may magnify or counteract the fair value sensitivity analysis and would make such an analysis not meaningful. The carrying value of our retained interests was approximately $1.9 billion at December 31, 2002, of which approximately $1.4 billion represented our mortgage servicing rights asset that was retained upon the sale of the underlying mortgage loans, as described above under "Mortgage Servicing Rights." The effects of any adverse potential changes in the estimated fair value of our retained interests are detailed in Note 20—Transfers and Servicing of Financial Assets to our Consolidated Financial Statements.

Financial Instruments.    We estimate fair values for each of our financial instruments, including derivative instruments. Most of these financial instruments are not publicly traded on an organized exchange. In the absence of quoted market prices, we must develop an estimate of fair value using dealer quotes, present value cash flow models, option pricing models or other conventional valuation methods, as appropriate. The use of these fair value techniques involves significant judgments and assumptions, including estimates of future interest rate levels based on interest rate yield curves, prepayment and volatility factors, and an estimation of the timing of future cash flows. The use of different assumptions may have a material effect on the estimated fair value amounts recorded in the financial statements, which are disclosed in Note 27—

45



Financial Instruments to our Consolidated Financial Statements. In addition, hedge accounting requires that at the beginning of each hedge period, we justify an expectation that the relationship between the changes in fair value of derivatives designated as hedges compared to changes in the fair value of the underlying hedged items be highly effective. This effectiveness assessment involves an estimation of changes in fair value resulting from changes in interest rates and corresponding changes in prepayment levels, as well as the probability of the occurrence of transactions for cash flow hedges. The use of different assumptions and changing market conditions may impact the results of the effectiveness assessment and ultimately the timing of when changes in derivative fair values and the underlying hedged items are recorded in earnings. See Item 7a. "Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk" for a discussion of the effect of hypothetical changes to these assumptions.

Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets.    We have reviewed the carrying values of our goodwill and other intangible assets as required by Statement of Financial Accounting Standards ("SFAS") No. 142, "Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets," by comparing the carrying values of our reporting units to their fair values and determined that the carrying amounts of our reporting units did not exceed their respective fair values. When determining fair value, we utilized various assumptions, including projections of future cash flows. A change in these underlying assumptions will cause a change in the results of the tests and, as such, could cause fair value to be less than the respective carrying amounts. In such event, we would then be required to record a charge, which would impact earnings. We will continue to review the carrying values of goodwill and other intangible assets for impairment annually, or more frequently if circumstances indicate impairment may have occurred.

We provide a wide range of consumer and business services and, as a result, our goodwill and other intangible assets are allocated among many diverse reporting units. Accordingly, it is difficult to quantify the impact of an adverse change in financial results and related cash flows, as such change may be isolated to a small number of our reporting units or spread across our entire organization. In either case, the magnitude of an impairment of such assets, if any, cannot be extrapolated. However, our businesses are concentrated in a few industries and, as such, an adverse change to any of these industries will impact our consolidated results and may result in impairment of our goodwill and other intangible assets. The aggregate carrying value of our goodwill and other intangible assets was approximately $13.2 billion at December 31, 2002, of which $10.7 billion represented goodwill, $1.1 billion represented other indefinite-lived intangible assets and $1.4 billion represented intangible assets with finite lives (refer to Note 12—Intangible Assets to our Consolidated Financial Statements for more information on goodwill and other intangible assets).

46


RESULTS OF OPERATIONS—20022003 vs. 20012002

Our consolidated results from continuing operations comprised the following:

 
 2002
 2001
 Change
 
Net revenues $14,088 $8,613 $5,475 
  
 
 
 
Expenses, excluding other charges and non-program related interest, net  11,793  7,003  4,790 
Other charges  374  671  (297)
Non-program related interest, net  262  252  10 
  
 
 
 
Total expenses  12,429  7,926  4,503 
  
 
 
 
Gains on dispositions of businesses    443  (443)
  
 
 
 
Losses on dispositions of businesses    (26) 26 
  
 
 
 
Impairment of investments    (441) 441 
  
 
 
 
Income before income taxes, minority interest and equity in Homestore  1,659  663  996 
Provision for income taxes  556  220  336 
Minority interest, net of tax  22  24  (2)
Losses related to equity in Homestore, net of tax    77  (77)
  
 
 
 
Income from continuing operations $1,081 $342 $739 
  
 
 
 
 
 2003
 2002
 Change
Net revenues $18,192 $14,187 $4,005
  
 
 
Total expenses  15,961  12,570  3,391
  
 
 
Income before income taxes, minority interest and equity in Homestore  2,231  1,617  614
Provision for income taxes  745  544  201
Minority interest, net of tax  21  22  (1)
  
 
 
Income from continuing operations $1,465 $1,051 $414
  
 
 

Net revenues and total expenses increased approximately $4.0 billion (28%) and $3.4 billion (27%), respectively, during 2003 principally due to the acquisitions of the following businesses, which contributed revenues and expenses (including depreciation and amortization expense) for the period January 1, 2003 through the anniversary date of the acquisition (the "Pre-Anniversary" period), as follows:

Acquired Business

 Date of Acquisition
 Pre-Anniversary
Net Revenues

 Pre-Anniversary
Total Expenses

NRT Incorporated(a) April 2002 $1,023 $1,072
Trendwest Resorts, Inc.(b) April 2002  169  150
Net assets of Budget Group, Inc.(c) November 2002  1,585  1,610
    
 
Total Contributions   $2,777 $2,832
    
 

(a)
Represents NRT and NRT's significant brokerage acquisitions subsequent to our ownership. Principally reflects the results of operations from January 1 through April 16, 2003 (the corresponding period during which these businesses were not included during 2002).
(b)
Reflects the results of operations from January 1 through April 30, 2003 (the corresponding period during which this business was not included during 2002).
(c)
Principally reflects the results of operations from January 1 through November 22, 2003 (the corresponding period during which this business was not included during 2002).

45


The above table reflects the net revenues and total expenses of the NRT, Trendwest and Budget businesses from January 1, 2003 to the anniversary date of our acquisitions thereof and, for NRT and Trendwest, are not indicative of the full year operating results contributed by these businesses. The amounts for NRT reflect the seasonality of the real estate brokerage business whereby the operating results are typically weakest in the early part of the calendar year and strengthen in the second and third quarters (which are not reflected in the above amounts, as NRT was acquired on April 17, 2002). The amounts for Budget include acquisition and integration-related costs, which were substantially incurred in the first year following the acquisition date; however, the benefits resulting from such costs are not realized until future periods. The integration of Budget represents a significant growth opportunity in future periods and is proceeding according to plan.

In addition to the contributions made by the aforementioned acquired businesses, revenues and expenses also increased during 2003 from (i) organic growth in our real estate services businesses, especially our real estate brokerage and mortgage businesses (even after adjusting for the $275 million non-cash provision for impairment of our mortgage servicing rights asset, which we recorded in 2002 and discuss in greater detail below under "Real Estate Services") and (ii) the consolidation of Trilegiant Corporation, which contributed incremental revenues and expenses (after elimination entries) of $200 million and $205 million, respectively. The growth in our mortgage and real estate brokerage businesses also contributed to the increase in total expenses as we incurred additional expenses to support the continued high level of mortgage loan production, related servicing activities and home sale transactions. The increases in total expenses were partially offset by a reduction of $231 million in acquisition and integration related costs primarily due to the amortization in 2002 of the pendings and listings intangible asset acquired as part of the acquisition of NRT, which was amortized over the closing period of the underlying contracts (approximately five months). In addition, total expenses benefited by a $92 million reduction in litigation and related charges. Our overall effective tax rate decreased to 33.4% for 2003 from 33.6% for 2002 primarily due to the utilization of capital loss carryforwards and lower taxes on foreign earnings, partially offset by an increase in state taxes, taxes on the redemption of our $375 million mandatorily redeemable preferred interest and other non-deductible items. As a result of the above-mentioned items, income from continuing operations increased $414 million (39%).

Discussed below are the results of operations for each of our reportable segments. Management evaluates the operating results of each of our reportable segments based upon revenue and "EBITDA," which is defined as income from continuing operations before non-program related depreciation and amortization, non-program related interest, amortization of pendings and listings, income taxes, minority interest and, in 2001, losses related to equity in Homestore. On January 1, 2003, we changed the performance measure we use to evaluate the operating results of our reportable segments and, as such, the information presented

46



below for 2002 has been revised to reflect this change. Our presentation of EBITDA may not be comparable to similar measures used by other companies.

 
 Revenues
 EBITDA
 
 
 2003
 2002
 % Change
 2003
 2002
 % Change
 
Real Estate Services $6,720 $4,687 43%$1,272 $832 53%
Hospitality Services  2,523  2,180 16  633  625 1 
Travel Distribution Services  1,659  1,695 (2)  459  526 (13) 
Vehicle Services  5,851  4,274 37  442  408 8 
Financial Services  1,401  1,325 6  363  450 (19) 
  
 
   
 
   
Total Reportable Segments  18,154  14,161 28  3,169  2,841 12 
Corporate and Other(a)  38  26 *  (35) (198) * 
  
 
   
 
   

Total Company

 

$

18,192

 

$

14,187

 

28

%

 

3,134

 

 

2,643

 

 

 
  
 
           

Less:  Non-program related depreciation and amortization

 

 

518

 

 

466

 

 

 
           Non-program related interest expense, net  307  262   
           Early extinguishment of debt          58  42   
           Amortization of pendings and listings  20  256   
          
 
   
 Income before income taxes, minority interest and
equity in Homestore
   $2,231 $1,617   
          
 
   

*
Not meaningful.
(a)
Includes the results of operations of our non-strategic businesses, unallocated corporate overhead and the elimination of transactions between segments.

Real Estate Services

Revenues and EBITDA increased $2,033 million (43%) and $440 million (53%), respectively, in 2003 compared with 2002, reflecting growth across all of our real estate businesses.

Revenues and EBITDA were primarily impacted by increased production volume and servicing revenues at our mortgage business and by the April 17, 2002 acquisition of NRT, our real estate brokerage subsidiary, and subsequent acquisitions by NRT of other real estate brokerages.

Revenues from mortgage-related activities grew $545 million (113%) in 2003 compared with 2002 due to a significant increase in mortgage loan production, partially offset by an increase in amortization of the mortgage servicing rights ("MSR") asset, as comparatively lower interest rates during 2003 resulted in record levels of mortgage refinancing activity. Revenues and EBITDA in 2002 were adversely impacted by a $275 million non-cash provision for impairment of our MSR asset. Declines in interest rates at such time resulted in increases to our current and estimated future loan prepayment rates and a corresponding provision for impairment against the value of our MSR asset. Excluding the $275 million non-cash MSR impairment provision in 2002, revenues from mortgage-related activities increased $270 million (56%) in 2003.

Revenues from mortgage loan production increased $433 million (49%) in 2003 compared with the prior year and were derived from growth in our fee-based mortgage origination operations (in which we broker or are outsourced mortgage origination activity for a fee) and a 56% increase in the volume of loans that we sold. We sold $59.5 billion of mortgage loans in 2003 compared with $38.1 billion in 2002, generating incremental production revenues of $330 million. In addition, production revenues generated from our fee-based mortgage-origination activity increased $103 million (41%) as compared with 2002. Production fee income on fee-based loans is generated at the time of closing, whereas originated mortgage loans held for sale generate revenues at the time of sale (within 60 days after closing). Accordingly, our production revenue in any given period is driven

47



by a mix of mortgage loans closed and mortgage loans sold. Total mortgage loans closed increased $24.4 billion (41%) to $83.7 billion in 2003, comprised of a $21.9 billion (57%) increase in closed loans to be securitized (sold by us) and a $2.5 billion (12%) increase in closed loans that were fee-based. Refinancings increased $18.1 billion (59%) to $48.7 billion and purchase mortgage closings grew $6.3 billion (22%) to $35.0 billion.

Net revenues from servicing mortgage loans increased $112 million primarily due to the $275 million non-cash provision for impairment of our MSR asset recorded in 2002, as discussed above. Apart from this impairment charge, net servicing revenues declined $163 million primarily due to a period-over-period increase in MSR amortization and provision for impairment (recorded as a contra revenue) of $246 million, partially offset by $48 million of incremental gains from hedging and other derivative activities. The increase in MSR amortization and provision for impairment is a result of the high levels of refinancings and related mortgage loan prepayments that occurred in 2003 due to low mortgage interest rates during 2003. The incremental gains from hedging and other derivative activities resulted from our strategies to protect earnings in the event that there was a decline in the value of our MSR asset, which can be caused by, among other factors, reductions in interest rates, as such reductions tend to increase borrower prepayment activity. In addition, recurring servicing fees (fees received for servicing existing loans in the portfolio), increased $33 million (8%) driven by a 16% period-over-period increase in the average servicing portfolio, which rose to $122.9 billion in 2003.

Interest rates have risen from their lows in the earlier part of 2003 and, as a result, in fourth quarter 2003 mortgage refinancing volume and resulting net production revenues comparatively declined. This decline in mortgage production revenues has been partially offset by an increase in revenues from mortgage servicing activities. Assuming interest rates remain constant or continue to rise, although no assurances can be given, we expect this trend (lower production revenue, partially offset by increased servicing revenue, net of hedging and other derivative activity) to continue during 2004. Historically, mortgage production and mortgage servicing operations have been counter-cyclical in nature and represented a naturally offsetting relationship. Additionally, to supplement this relationship, we have maintained a comprehensive, non-speculative mortgage risk management program to further mitigate the impact of fluctuations in interest rates on our operating results.

We acquired NRT (inclusive of its title and closing business, which are now included in our settlement services business) on April 17, 2002 and, in addition, NRT acquired real estate brokerage businesses subsequent to our ownership. The operating results of NRT and its significant acquisitions were included from their acquisition dates forward and, therefore, contributed $1,023 million of revenues and an EBITDA decline of $21 million during the Pre-Anniversary period in 2003. The EBITDA decline is reflective of the seasonality of the real estate brokerage business, whereby the operating results are typically weakest in the early part of the calendar year and strengthen in the second and third quarters. Excluding the impact of NRT's brokerage acquisitions, NRT generated incremental net revenues of $280 million, a 10% increase in the comparable post-acquisition periods in 2003 versus 2002. The increase in NRT's revenues was substantially comprised of incremental commission income on home sale transactions, primarily due to a 10% increase in the average price of homes sold. Real estate agent commission expenses also increased $180 million as a result of the incremental revenues earned on home sale transactions. During 2002, prior to our acquisition of NRT, we received royalty and marketing fees from NRT of $66 million, real estate referral fees of $9 million, and a $16 million termination fee related to a franchise agreement under which NRT operated brokerage offices under our ERA real estate brand. We also had a preferred stock investment in NRT, which generated dividend income of $10 million prior to our acquisition in 2002. In addition, revenues in 2003 benefited from $82 million (with no impact on EBITDA) relating to certain accounting reclassifications made in 2003 primarily in connection with the merger of our pre-existing title and closing businesses with and into the larger-scale title and appraisal business of NRT. Upon combining such businesses, we changed certain accounting presentations used by our pre-existing businesses to conform to the presentations used by NRT. Excluding such reclassifications, our settlement services business generated incremental revenues of $65 million compared with 2002. Title, appraisal and other closing fees all increased due to higher volumes, consistent with the growth in the mortgage origination markets through the first nine months of 2003, as well as cross-selling initiatives.

48



On a comparable basis, including royalties paid by NRT to our real estate franchise business, our real estate franchise business generated year-over-year incremental royalties and marketing fund revenues of $77 million in 2003, an increase of 12% over 2002. NRT contributed $303 million of royalties to our real estate franchise business in 2003 and $274 million of royalties in 2002, of which $208 million was contributed after our acquisition of NRT. The increase in royalties and marketing fund revenues within our real estate franchise business was principally driven by a 7% increase in volume of home sale transactions and a 9% increase in the average price of homes sold. Royalty increases in the real estate franchise business are recognized with little or no corresponding increase in expenses due to the significant operating leverage within our franchise operations.

Excluding the impact from our acquisition of NRT, NRT's significant acquisitions and NRT's real estate agent commission expenses (discussed above), operating and administrative expenses within this segment increased approximately $295 million compared to 2002 primarily due to the direct costs incurred in connection with increased mortgage loan production and related servicing activities.

Hospitality Services

Revenues and EBITDA increased $343 million (16%) and $8 million (1%), respectively, in 2003 compared with 2002. We completed the acquisitions of Trendwest, a leading vacation ownership company, in June 2002 (90% was acquired in April 2002); Equivest Finance, Inc. in February 2002; and several European vacation rental companies during 2002. The operating results of the acquired companies were included from the acquisition dates forward and therefore were incremental for the portions of 2003 that were pre-acquisition periods in 2002. Accordingly, Trendwest, Equivest, and the acquired vacation rental companies contributed incremental revenues of $169 million, $8 million and $53 million, respectively, and EBITDA of $23 million, $2 million and $15 million, respectively, in 2003 compared with 2002. In February 2003, we acquired the common interests of FFD Development Company, LLC ("FFD"), the primary developer of timeshare inventory for our Fairfield Resorts subsidiary. The operating results of FFD were included from the acquisition date forward and were not significant to our segment results subsequent to our acquisition. Prior to our acquisition, we owned a preferred stock investment in FFD, which accrued a dividend, and we also received additional fees from FFD for providing various support services. Accordingly, prior to our acquisition, FFD contributed revenues and EBITDA of $16 million and $4 million, respectively, to 2002 results.

Excluding the impact from acquisitions described above, revenues in 2003 increased $129 million (6%) while EBITDA declined $28 million (5%) and the EBITDA margin (EBITDA as a percentage of revenues) dropped from 29% in 2002 to 25% in 2003. The reduction in EBITDA margin was driven principally by a shift in the mix of business operations comprising segment results in 2003 compared with 2002 and a reduction in travel demand during 2003 due to the military conflict in Iraq as well as economic pressures, which contributed to suppressing volumes within certain of our hospitality businesses.

Despite a challenging travel environment, revenues from sales of vacation ownership interests ("VOIs") in our timeshare sales and marketing business increased $103 million in 2003, an 11% increase over 2002. This increase was driven primarily by a 4% increase in tour flow and a 3% increase in the average revenue generated per tour at our timeshare resort sites. The growth in our timeshare sales and marketing businesses positively impacted the segment results and also contributed to a lower year-over-year segment EBITDA margin, as this business typically operates with lower margins than our lodging franchise and timeshare exchange businesses, which have greater operating leverage. Net interest income generated from the financing extended to VOI buyers decreased $8 million as the effects of growth in the loan portfolio were more than offset by the impact of consolidating our principal timeshare securitization structure in September 2003 and, at such time, no longer recording gains on the sale of receivables to such entity (see Note 16 to our Consolidated Financial Statements). Timeshare subscription and exchange fee revenues within our timeshare exchange business increased $36 million (8%), primarily due to a 13% increase in the average fee per exchange, which was partially offset by a 3% reduction in the volume of exchange transactions. The increase in the average exchange fee includes a favorable yield on increased rentals of excess RCI vacation interval inventory to RCI members in 2003 compared with 2002.

49



Royalties and marketing and reservation fund revenues within our lodging franchise operations declined $8 million (2%) in 2003 due to a 5% decline in the number of weighted average rooms available following our decision to terminate from our franchise system certain properties that were not meeting required standards. However, such quality control initiatives also contributed to an increase in the occupancy levels and average daily room rates at our lodging brands, and, as a result, revenue per available room increased 2% period-over-period and partially offset the impact on royalties from the reduction in available rooms. Our lodging franchise business and our franchisees were unfavorably impacted by the weaker travel environment, as previously discussed, and as a result, during 2003, we recorded an incremental $6 million of non-cash expenses related to the doubtful collectability of certain franchisee receivables. In addition, although revenues and EBITDA were nominally impacted on a consolidated basis, preferred alliance revenues within this segment declined $19 million in 2003 due to a change in the allocation of such revenues. Revenues received from preferred vendors in 2002 substantially benefited the Hospitality Services segment whereas in 2003, the benefits of such revenues extended to business units within other reportable segments. Excluding acquisitions, operating and administrative expenses within this segment increased approximately $130 million in 2003 principally due to increased timeshare sales-related expenses, including marginal expense increases on higher sales volumes, higher product costs on developed timeshare inventory and an increased investment in marketing spending to enhance tour flow.

Travel Distribution Services

Revenues and EBITDA declined $36 million (2%) and $67 million (13%), respectively, in 2003 compared with 2002. Our Travel Distribution Services segment derives revenue from (i) Galileo booking fees paid by travel suppliers for electronic global distribution and computer reservation services ("GDS"), (ii) fees and commissions for retail travel services provided by Cendant Travel, Cheap Tickets and Lodging.com and (iii) transaction and other fees from providing travel distribution services. Like other industry participants, this segment was unfavorably impacted by weak global travel demand during 2003. Travel demand in 2003 was negatively affected by various factors, including the military conflict in Iraq and terrorist threat alerts, continuing economic pressures and SARS concerns in the Asia-Pacific region and other parts of the world. Such factors suppressed bookings and revenues across our travel distribution businesses, but primarily impacted international travel volumes.

Galileo worldwide air booking fees decreased $71 million (6%) primarily due to a 10% decline in international GDS booking volumes, partially offset by domestic GDS booking volumes, which stabilized in 2003 compared with 2002. Galileo acquired certain European national distribution companies ("NDCs") during 2002. NDCs are independent organizations that market and sell Galileo global distribution and computer reservation services to travel agents and other subscribers. The NDC acquisitions contributed incremental subscriber fee revenues and EBITDA of $29 million and $12 million, respectively, in 2003. During the summer of 2002, we also acquired two other companies that supply reservation and distribution services to the hospitality industry. The operating results of such companies were included from the acquisition dates forward and collectively contributed revenue of $24 million with a nominal EBITDA impact during 2003.

In April 2003, we completed the acquisition of Trip Network Inc., an online travel agent that operated the online travel services business of Cheap Tickets. From the acquisition date forward, Trip Network generated $30 million of revenues and had an EBITDA loss of $23 million in 2003. In addition, principally as a result of our ownership of Trip Network, an incremental $15 million of intercompany segment revenues were eliminated in 2003, most of which were Trip Network revenues earned from Galileo for airline bookings made by Trip Network using Galileo's GDS System. Our online booking volumes grew 58% in 2003 compared with 2002, primarily due to (i) a shift in travel bookings from the traditional off-line channels to online channels, (ii) an increase in online travel bookings; and (iii) increased merchant model hotel bookings where we, as a travel distributor, obtain access to content from travel suppliers at a pre-determined price and sell the content, either individually or in a package, to travelers at retail prices that we determine with little or no risk of inventory loss. Additionally, revenues from our off-line travel agency business declined $24 million in 2003, as we accelerated our shift to the online channel. The results of our online and off-line travel agency operations are reflective of

50



the general industry decline in travel demand during 2003, as previously discussed, reductions in commission rates paid by airlines, the lack of reduced-rate air inventory availability and a decline in travel-related clubs (which we service). Such results also reflect our investment in the marketing and administration of our online travel services business, which we believe represents a significant opportunity for future growth.

The EBITDA impact of lower GDS and travel agency revenues was partially offset by a corresponding decline in variable expenses, reductions in retiree medical costs as a result of post-retirement plan amendments and other net reductions in operating expenses from segment-wide re-engineering and cost containment initiatives implemented in 2002 and 2003. These operating expense reductions helped mitigate the negative impact of the weak travel environment that existed during 2003. Additionally, EBITDA in 2003 was favorably impacted by $8 million in connection with a contract termination settlement during first quarter 2003.

Vehicle Services

Revenues and EBITDA increased $1,577 million (37%) and $34 million (8%), respectively, in 2003 compared with 2002 primarily due to our November 2002 acquisition of substantially all of the domestic assets, as well as selected international operations, of the vehicle rental business of Budget Group, Inc. Budget's operating results, including integration costs, were included from the acquisition date forward and contributed incremental revenues of $1,585 million with an EBITDA decline of $2 million in 2003. Excluding the impact of Budget, segment revenues declined $8 million (less than 1%), while EBITDA increased $36 million (9%) in 2003, which is primarily attributable to reduced car rental demand, offset by increased pricing, at Avis and favorable results at our Wright Express fuel card services subsidiary.

Avis domestic car rental revenues declined $91 million (4%) in 2003 compared with 2002. The net reduction in domestic car rental revenues at Avis was primarily due to a 7% period-over-period reduction in the total number of car rental days. This was partially offset by a 2% increase in time and mileage revenue per rental day reflecting an increase in pricing, which has minimal associated incremental costs. In addition, EBITDA, period-over-period, includes favorable program-related interest costs of $33 million on the financing of vehicles due to lower interest rates and $35 million of lower program-related depreciation expense on vehicles due to a different mix of vehicles in Avis' fleet bearing a lower cost in 2003 compared with 2002. This favorable impact on EBITDA was substantially offset by incremental vehicle-related net expenses and other operating costs. The increase in net expenses includes incremental maintenance and damage costs, higher vehicle license and registration fees and unfavorable conditions in the used car market in 2003 compared with 2002 for vehicles that did not meet the eligibility criteria under our manufacturers repurchase program. However, the percentage of Avis' fleet that was determined ineligible for manufacturer repurchase decreased to 1.7% in 2003 from 2.7% in 2002. Revenues from Avis' international operations increased $60 million due to increased transaction volume and the favorable impact to revenues of exchange rates in Canada, Australia and New Zealand, which was principally offset in EBITDA by the unfavorable impact on expenses.

Wright Express, our fuel card services subsidiary, recognized incremental revenues of $30 million (24%) in 2003 compared with the prior year. The organic growth was driven by a combination of the addition of new customers and an increase in usage of Wright Express' proprietary fleet fuel card product. Higher gasoline prices also contributed to the revenue growth, since Wright Express earns a percentage of total gasoline purchases by its clients.

Financial Services

Revenues increased $76 million (6%) and EBITDA declined $87 million (19%), respectively, in 2003 compared with 2002. Effective July 1, 2003, pursuant to the provisions of FASB Interpretation No. 46 ("FIN 46"), we consolidated Trilegiant. Trilegiant (on a stand-alone basis before elimination of intercompany transactions with our retained membership business) contributed revenues of $241 million and an EBITDA loss of $8 million subsequent to consolidation in 2003. Apart from the consolidation of Trilegiant, revenues and EBITDA declined $165 million and $79 million, respectively, reflecting, as expected, the continued attrition of the membership base retained by us in connection with the outsourcing of our individual membership business to Trilegiant. However, the unfavorable impact of reduced revenues on EBITDA was mitigated by a net reduction

51


in expenses from servicing fewer members. A smaller membership base resulted in a net revenue reduction of $194 million (net of $26 million of increased royalty income from Trilegiant), which was partially offset in EBITDA by net favorable membership operating and marketing expenses of $111 million. As a result of the consolidation of Trilegiant, we eliminated $34 million of intercompany revenues within this segment in 2003, which was substantially comprised of royalty and lease payments made from Trilegiant to our pre-existing membership business subsequent to the consolidation of Trilegiant on July 1, 2003. For a more detailed discussion of our relationship with Trilegiant and the consolidation thereof as a result of FIN 46, see Note 23 to our Consolidated Financial Statements. Additionally, in January 2004, we made modifications to the existing relationship with Trilegiant. See Note 30 to our Consolidated Financial Statements for a detailed account of such modifications.

Partially offsetting the impact of the attrition in our retained membership business, was revenue growth in our Jackson Hewitt Tax Service operations, favorable results of our insurance-wholesale-related operations and the favorable impact of foreign currency exchange rates on the revenues of our international membership business (which was principally offset in EBITDA by the unfavorable impact of foreign exchange rates on expenses). In 2003, Jackson Hewitt generated incremental franchise royalty and tax preparation revenues of $12 million and $7 million, respectively, which was partially offset by a $6 million reduction in revenues generated from financial product programs and other tax-related services. The increase in royalties and tax preparation fees was principally driven by a 13% increase in total system tax return volume and a 7% increase in the average price per return. Royalties generated in our franchise operations are typically recognized with nominal increases in expenses due to significant operating leverage within this business, however, during 2003, we invested an incremental $6 million in marketing for the Jackson Hewitt business and were negatively impacted by a $9 million expense incurred in connection with a litigation settlement. Revenues from insurance-wholesale-related operations increased $13 million as a result of favorable claims experience period-over-period and increased insurance premium collections. Additionally, in second quarter 2003, we ceased marketing and selling new long-term care policies within our long-term preferred care business, but will continue servicing the existing in-force block of policy holders. This resulted in a reduction in revenue of $9 million with a nominal impact to EBITDA. In 2003, EBITDA was also impacted by a $7 million charge for actions taken in third quarter 2003 at our international membership business, which included the closure and consolidation of certain facilities and a reduction in staff in the United Kingdom.

Corporate and Other

Revenues and EBITDA increased $12 million and $163 million, respectively, in 2003 compared with 2002. Revenues and EBITDA include a $30 million gain in connection with the sale of our equity investment in Entertainment Publication, Inc. recorded during first quarter 2003. Also, we earned revenues in both 2003 and 2002 in connection with credit card marketing programs whereby we earn revenues based on a percentage of credit card spending. Additionally, we recognized expenses as cardholders earned points based on credit card usage. We generated $20 million of incremental revenues and incurred $19 million of additional point-related liabilities during 2003 in connection with these programs. Partially offsetting the revenue increases were $33 million of incremental intersegment revenue eliminations in 2003 due to increased intercompany business activities.

EBITDA was favorable year-over-year principally due to a $92 million net reduction in securities-related litigation charges (litigation charges less insurance recoveries) in 2003 compared with 2002 principally as a result of the absence in 2003 of litigation settlements and accruals established in 2002 in connection with all remaining CUC-related securities litigation. Also contributing to the favorable EBITDA change was a $33 million reduction in bonus expenses and other incentive-based compensation. In addition, EBITDA was favorably impacted by a greater absorption of overhead expenses by our reportable operating segments during 2003 compared with 2002 principally due to revenue growth at our business units (expenses are allocated on a percentage of revenue basis) and expense allocations in 2003 to companies acquired during 2002. Partially offsetting favorable EBITDA was a $10 million accrual recorded in 2003 to revise our original estimate of costs to exit a facility in connection with the previous outsourcing of our data center operations.

52



RESULTS OF OPERATIONS—2002 vs. 2001

Our consolidated results from continuing operations comprised the following:

 
 2002
 2001
 Change
 
Net revenues $14,187 $8,693 $5,494 
  
 
 
 
Total expenses  12,570  8,006  4,564 
Gains on dispositions of businesses    443  (443)
Losses on dispositions of businesses    (26) 26 
Impairment of investments    (441) 441 
  
 
 
 
Income before income taxes, minority interest and equity in Homestore  1,617  663  954 
Provision for income taxes  544  220  324 
Minority interest, net of tax  22  24  (2)
Losses related to equity in Homestore, net of tax    77  (77)
  
 
 
 
Income from continuing operations $1,051 $342 $709 
  
 
 
 

Net revenues and total expenses increased approximately $5.5 billion and $4.5approximately $4.6 billion, respectively, during 2002 primarily due to the acquisitions of the following businesses, which contributed incremental revenues and expenses aggregating $5.4 billion(including depreciation and $4.9 billion, respectively:amortization expense) for the relative Pre-Anniversary periods as follows:

Acquired Business

 Date of Acquisition
 Incremental
Contribution to
Net Revenues

 Incremental
Contribution to
Total Expenses

  Date of Acquisition
 Pre-Anniversary
Net Revenues

 Pre-Anniversary
Total Expenses

 
Avis Group Holdings, Inc. March 2001 $562 $569  March 2001 $575 $582 
Fairfield Resorts, Inc. April 2001 137 123  April 2001 137  123 
Galileo International, Inc. October 2001 1,199 852  October 2001 1,199  852 
NRT April 2002 3,034 2,881(a) April 2002 3,034  2,881(a)
Trendwest April 2002 348 289(b) April 2002 348  289(b)
Budget November 2002 161 159 
Net asset of Budget Group, Inc. November 2002 164  162 
   
 
    
 
 
Total Contributions   $5,441 $4,873    $5,457 $4,889 
   
 
    
 
 

(a)
Excludes $235 million of non-cash amortization of the pendings and listings intangible asset and $27 million of acquisition and integration related costs.costs, which are discussed below.
(b)
Excludes $21 million of non-cash amortization of the pendings and listings intangible asset and $1 million of acquisition and integration related costs.costs, which are discussed below.

In addition to the contributions made by acquired businesses, net revenues were favorably impacted by growth in our Real Estate Services and Vehicle Services segments (exclusive of acquisitions). For, which also contributed to the increase in total expenses as we incurred additional expenses to support this growth. Further contributing to the increase in total expenses is $173 million of additional acquisition and integration related charges recorded during 2002—see Note 4 to our Consolidated Financial Statements for a detailed discussion of revenue trends, see below.

acquisition and integration related charges recorded in 2002 and 2001. Partially offsetting the increase in total expenses recorded during 2002 was a decrease of $297$393 million reduction in restructuring and other charges as follows:

 
 2002
 2001
 Change
 
Acquisitions and integration related(a) $285 $112 $173 
Litigation and related(b)  103  86  17 
Restructuring and other unusual(c)  (14) 379  (393)
Mortgage servicing rights impairment(d)    94  (94)
  
 
 
 
Total other charges(e) $374 $671 $(297)
  
 
 
 

(a)
The 2002 charges represent (i) the non-cash amortization of the pendings and listings intangible asset ($256 million) primarily resulting from our acquisition of NRT and (ii) other acquisition and integration-related costs ($29 million) also primarily resulting from our acquisition of NRT. The 2001 charges primarily related to (i) outsourcing our information technology operations to IBM in connection with the acquisition of Galileo ($78 million), (ii) integrating our existing travel agency

47


(b)
The 2002 and 2001 charges were incurred in connection with settlements or investigations relating to the 1998 discovery of accounting irregularities in the former business units of CUC International, Inc. The 2002 charge was partially offset by a credit of $42 million related to the recovery under our directors' and officers' liability insurance policy in connection with derivative actions arising from former CUC related litigation, while the 2001 charge was partially offset by a non-cash credit of $14 million to reflect an adjustment to the PRIDES class action litigation settlement charge recorded by the Company in 1998.
(c)
The 2002 amount represents non-cash credits related to changes in the original estimates of costs to be incurred in connection with our restructuring initiatives undertaken during 2001 as a result of the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks. The 2001 amount primarily represents charges related to (i) the restructuring initiatives undertaken in response to the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks ($192 million), (ii) the funding of an irrevocable contribution to the Real Estate Technology Trust ($95 million), (iii) the funding of Trip Network, Inc. ($85 million) and (iv) a contribution to the Cendant Charitable Foundation ($7 million). The activity and ending balance of the 2001 restructuring accrual can be found inunusual charges—see Note 7—Other Charges (Credits) to our Consolidated Financial Statements.
(d)
The 2001 charge was incurred in connection with unprecedented rate reductions subsequent to the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks that we deemed not to be in the ordinary course of business. The 2002 impairments were recorded as reductions to net revenues.
(e)
See Note 7—Other Charges (Credits)10 to our Consolidated Financial Statements for a detailed descriptiondiscussion of each charge.
restructuring and other unusual charges recorded during 2002 and 2001.

Additionally, our 2001 operating results were impacted by gains and losses related to the dispositions of businesses, as well as by losses related to the impairment of investments, while our 2002 results were not impacted by such events. During 2001, these events resulted in (i) $443 million of gains primarily related to the sale of our real estate Internet portal ($436 million), (ii) $26 million of losses related to the dispositions of non-strategic businesses and (iii) $441 million of losses related to the impairment of our investments in Homestore, Inc. ($407 million) and lodging and Internet-related businesses ($34 million).

53



Our overall effective tax rate was 33.5%33.6% and 33.2% for 2002 and 2001, respectively. The effective rate for 2002 was higher fromdue to the negative impact of a reduction in the amount of foreign tax credits and state net operating losses that were utilized, which waswere only partially offset by the benefit from the impact on the tax provision from the elimination of goodwill amortization.

Our 2001 operating results were also negatively impacted by after-tax losses of $77 million related to our equity ownership in Homestore, which was received in connection with the sale of our Internet real estate portal to Homestore in February 2001. Our investment in Homestore has been recorded at zero since fourth quarter 2001 and, as such, we are no longer required by generally accepted accounting principles to record a proportionate share of Homestore's losses. Therefore, during 2002, our operating results were not impacted by our investment in Homestore. We have no future obligations relating to our investment in Homestore. For a detailed discussion regarding the sale of our real estate Internet portal and our investment in Homestore, refer to Notes 52 and 626 to our Consolidated Financial Statements.

As a result of the above-mentioned items, income from continuing operations increased $739$709 million or 216%, during 2002.

Discussed below are the operating results of operations for each of our reportable segments, which focuses on revenues and Adjusted EBITDA. Adjusted EBITDA is defined as earnings before non-program related interest, income taxes, non-program related depreciation and amortization, minority interest and,has been revised to reflect the previously described change in 2001, equity in Homestore. Suchthe performance measure is then adjustedthat we use to exclude items that areevaluate the operating results of a non-recurring or unusual nature and are also not measured in assessing segment performance. In accordance with SFAS No. 131, "Disclosures About Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information," our management believes such discussions are the most informative representation of how management evaluates performance. However, our presentation of Adjusted EBITDA may not be comparable with similar measures used by other companies. The footnotes to the table presented below describe the items that have been excluded from Adjusted EBITDA.reportable segments.

48


 
 Revenues
 Adjusted EBITDA
 
 
 2002
 2001
 % Change
 2002(a)
 2001(b)
 % Change
 
Real Estate Services(c) $4,687 $1,859 152%$853 $939 (9%)
Hospitality(d)  2,180  1,522 43% 625  513 22%
Travel Distribution(e)  1,695  437 288% 524  108 385%
Vehicle Services(f)  4,175  3,322 26% 408  290 41%
Financial Services  1,325  1,402 (5%) 449  310 45%
  
 
   
 
   
Total Reportable Segments  14,062  8,542    2,859  2,160   
Corporate and Other(g)  26  71 *  (98) (73)* 
  
 
   
 
   
Total Company $14,088 $8,613    2,761  2,087   
  
 
           
Less: Non-program related depreciation and amortization          466  477   
Less: Other charges:                 
 Acquisition and integration related costs          285  112   
 Litigation and related costs          103  86   
 Restructuring and other unusual charges          (14) 379   
 Mortgage servicing rights impairment            94   
Less: Non-program related interest, net          262  252   
Plus: Gains on dispositions of businesses            443   
Less: Losses on dispositions of businesses            26   
Less: Impairment of investments            441   
          
 
   
Income before income taxes, minority interest and equity in Homestore         $1,659 $663   
          
 
   
 
 Revenues
 EBITDA
 
 
 2002
 2001
 % Change
 2002
 2001
 % Change
 
Real Estate Services $4,687 $1,859 152%$832 $719 16%
Hospitality Services  2,180  1,522 43  625  450 39 
Travel Distribution Services  1,695  437 288  526  78 574 
Vehicle Services  4,274  3,402 26  408  226 81 
Financial Services  1,325  1,402 (5) 450  299 51 
  
 
   
 
   
Total Reportable Segments  14,161  8,622 64  2,841  1,772 60 
Corporate and Other (a)  26  71 *  (198) (380)* 
  
 
   
 
   
Total Company $14,187 $8,693 63  2,643  1,392   
  
 
           
Less:    Non-program related depreciation and amortization  466  477   
             Non-program related interest expense, net  262  252   
             Early extinguishment of debt  42     
             Amortization of pendings and listings  256     
          
 
   
Income before income taxes, minority interest and
    equity in Homestore
 $1,617 $663   
          
 
   

*
Not meaningful.
(a)
Adjusted EBITDA excludes non-cash credits of $14 million related to changes in the original estimates of costs to be incurred in connection with restructuring initiatives undertaken during 2001 as a result of the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks ($6 million, $1 million and $7 million of credits were recorded within Real Estate Services, Vehicle Services and Corporate and Other, respectively).
(b)
Adjusted EBITDA excludes charges of $192 million incurred primarily in connection with restructuring and other initiatives undertaken as a result of the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks ($31 million, $51 million, $58 million, $7 million, $10 million and $35 million of charges were recorded within Real Estate Services, Hospitality, Vehicle Services, Travel Distribution, Financial Services and Corporate and Other, respectively).
(c)
Adjusted EBITDA for 2002 excludes a charge of $27 million principally related to the acquisition and integration of NRT and other real estate brokerage businesses. Adjusted EBITDA for 2001 excludes charges of $95 million related to the funding of an irrevocable contribution to the Real Estate Technology Trust and $94 million related to the impairment of our mortgage servicing rights asset.
(d)
Adjusted EBITDA for 2002 excludes $1 million of acquisition and integration related costs. Adjusted EBITDA for 2001 excludes a charge of $11 million related to the impairment of investments due in part to the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks.
(e)
Adjusted EBITDA for 2001 excludes charges of $23 million related to the acquisition and integration of Galileo and Cheap Tickets.
(f)
Adjusted EBITDA for 2001 excludes charges of $5 million related to the acquisition and integration of Avis and $2 million related to the impairment of investments due to the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks.
(g)
RepresentsIncludes the results of operations of our non-strategic businesses, unallocated corporate overhead and the elimination of transactions between segments. Adjusted EBITDA for 2002 excludes $145 million of litigation and related costs and $1 million of acquisition and integration related costs. Such charges were partially offset by a credit of $42 million related to the recovery under our directors' and officers' liability insurance policy in connection with derivative actions arising from former CUC related litigation. Adjusted EBITDA for 2001 excludes charges of (i) $427 million primarily related to the impairment of our investment in Homestore, (ii) $100 million for litigation and related costs, (iii) $85 million related to the funding of Trip Network, (iv) $78 million related to the outsourcing of our information technology operations to IBM in connection with the acquisition of Galileo, (v) $26 million related to losses on the dispositions of non-strategic businesses in 1999, (vi) $7 million related to a non-cash contribution to the Cendant Charitable Foundation and (vii) $4 million related to the acquisition and integration of Avis. Such charges were partially offset by (i) a gain of $436 million related to the sale of our real estate Internet portal, (ii) a gain of $7 million related to the dispositions of non-strategic businesses and (iii) a credit of $14 million to reflect an adjustment to the settlement charge recorded in the fourth quarter of 1998 for the PRIDES class action litigation.

49


Real Estate Services

Revenues and EBITDA increased $2.8 billion (152%) while Adjusted EBITDA declined $86and $113 million (9%(16%), respectively, during 2002. The increase in revenues was2002 principally driven by the contribution of approximately $3.0 billion in revenues from the acquisition of NRT (the operating results of which have been included in our consolidated results since April 17, 2002). The NRT acquisition also contributed $194revenue and EBITDA of $3.0 billion and $167 million, to Adjusted EBITDA during 2002.respectively. Prior to our acquisition of NRT, we received royalty and marketing fees of $220 million, real estate referral fees of $37 million and termination fees of $16 million from NRT during 2001. For the period from January 1, 2002 through April 17, 2002, NRT paid us royalty and marketing fees of $66 million, real estate referral fees of $9 million and a termination fee of $16 million. We also had a preferred stock investment in NRT prior to our acquisition that generated dividend income of $10 million and $27 million during 2002 and 2001, respectively.

On a comparable basis, including post-acquisition intercompany royalties paid by NRT, our real estate franchise brands generated year-over-year incremental royalties of $92 million in 2002, an increase of 18% over 2001. The increase in royalties from our real estate franchise brands primarily resulted from a 10% increase in home sale transactions by franchisees and NRT, and a 10% increase in the average price of

54



homes sold. Royalty increases in the real estate franchise business are recognized with little or no corresponding increase in expenses due to the significant operating leverage within our franchise operations. Industry statistics provided by the National Association of Realtors for the twelve months ended December 31, 2002 indicate that the number of single-family homes sold increased 5% versus the prior year, while the average price of those homes sold increased approximately 9%. Through our continued franchise sales efforts, we have grown our franchised operations and in conjunction with NRT acquisitions of real estate brokerages, we have increased market share as our transaction volume has significantly outperformed the industry.

Revenues and Adjusted EBITDA in 2002 were negatively impacted by a $275 million non-cash provision for impairment of our mortgage servicing rights ("MSR") asset, which is the value of expected future cash flows.MSR asset. As noted above inelsewhere herein under "Critical Accounting Policies," the valuation of our MSR asset is generated by numerous estimates and assumptions, the most noteworthy being future prepayment rates, which represent the borrowers' propensity to refinance their mortgage.mortgages. Today's mortgage industry enables homeowners to more easily refinance than they could in the past producing a change in consumer behavior that results in a greater likelihood to refinance in periods of declining interest rates, as experienced in the third quarter of 2002. During such period, interest rates on ten-year Treasury notes and 30-year mortgages declined by 120 basis points and 80 basis points, respectively, which at such time, resulted in the lowest interest rate levels in 41 years. As a result, we recognized that steep declines in interest rates experienced throughout the quarter and the related impact on current borrower prepayment behavior necessitated an increase to our estimate of future prepayment rates. Therefore, we updated the third party model we use to value our MSR asset to one that had recently become available in the marketplace, and revised our assumptions in order to better reflect more current borrower prepayment behavior. The combination of these factors resulted in increases to our estimated future loan prepayment rates, which negatively impacted the value of our MSR asset, hence requiring the provision for impairment of our MSR asset. Further declines in interest rates due to a weakening economy and geopolitical risks, which result in an increase in refinancing activity or changes in the methodology of valuing our MSR asset, could adversely impact the valuation.

Excluding the $275 million non-cash provision for impairment of MSRs,our MSR asset, revenues from mortgage-related activities increased $28 million in 2002 compared with 2001 as revenue growth from mortgage production was principally offset by a decline in net revenues from mortgage servicing activities. Revenues from mortgage loan production increased $228 million (35%) in 2002 compared with the prior year due to substantial growth in our outsourcedfee-based mortgage origination and broker businessoperations (explained below) and a 6% increase in the volume of loans that we packaged and securitized (sold by us). In 2002, revenues generated from our fee-based outsourcing and broker origination business grew at a faster rate than revenues generated from packaging and selling mortgage loans to the secondary market ourselves. Production fee income on outsourced and brokeredfee-based loans is generated at the time of closing, whereas originated mortgage loans held for sale generate revenues at the time of sale (typically 30-60(within 60 days after closing). Accordingly, our production revenue is now driven by more of a mix in both mortgage loans closed and mortgage loans sold (as opposed to just loans sold). Production loans sold increased $2.1 billion

50


(6%), generating incremental production revenues of $83 million. Mortgage loans closed increased $14.8 billion (33%) to $59.3 billion, comprised of a $14.0 billion (206%) increase in closed loans whichthat were outsourced or brokered,fee-based and a $750 million (2%) increase in closed loans to be securitized. The increase in outsourced and brokeredfee-based loan volume contributed incremental production revenues of $145 million in 2002 compared with 2001. Purchase mortgage closings grew 14% to $28.7 billion, and refinancings increased 58% to $30.6 billion. Additionally, in connection with our securitized loans we realized an increase in margin which is consistent with the mortgage industry operating at a higher percentage of loan production capacity.

Net revenues from servicing mortgage loans declined $199 million, excluding the $275 million non-cash provision for impairment of MSRs.our MSR asset. However, recurring servicing fees (fees received for servicing existing loans in the portfolio) increased $59 million (17%) primarily due to a 20% year-over-year increase in the average servicing portfolio. Such recurring activity was more than offset by $361 million of increased

55



mortgage servicing rights amortization and valuation adjustments due to the high levels of refinancings and related loan prepayments, resulting from the lower interest rate environment, partially offset by $112 million of incremental net gains from hedging and other derivative activities to protect against changes in the fair value of MSR'sour MSR asset due to fluctuations in interest rates.

Revenues and Adjusted EBITDA of this segment were also negatively impacted by a reduction of $44 million in revenue generated from relocation activities as a result of a decline in relocation-related homesale activity and lower interest rates charged to our clients. Also contributing to the increase in EBITDA is the absence in 2002 of the following charges recorded during 2001: (i) $95 million related to the funding of an irrevocable contribution to the Real Estate Technology Trust and (ii) $94 million related to the impairment of our mortgage servicing rights. This $94 million charge did not impact revenue as it was separately presented as an expense on our Consolidated Statement of Income for 2001 (see Note 6 to our Consolidated Financial Statements for more information concerning this presentation). Excluding the acquisition of NRT, operating and administrative expenses within this segment increased $74 million. Higher expenses incurred to operate the mortgage business to support the continued high levels of mortgage loan production and related servicing activities were partially offset by a reduction in relocation-related costs, adjusting to a weaker corporate spending environment.

Hospitality Services

Revenues and Adjusted EBITDA increased $658 million (43%) and $112$175 million (22%(39%), respectively, primarily due to the acquisitions of Fairfield Resorts, Inc. in April 2001, Trendwest in April 2002 and Equivest in February 2002 and certain other vacation rental companies abroad in 2002 and 2001. Fairfield, for the first quarter of 2002 (the period in which no comparable results were included in 2001), Trendwest, Equivest and the other acquired vacation rental companies, contributed incremental revenues of $137 million, $348 million, $107 million, and $41 million, respectively, and incremental Adjusted EBITDA of $18 million, $62 million, $24 million and $5 million, respectively, in 2002 compared with 2001.

Excluding the impact from these acquisitions, revenues and EBITDA increased $18 million while Adjusted EBITDA declined $4and $66 million, respectively, year-over-year. Growth within our Vacation Rental Group (exclusive of acquisitions) contributed incremental revenues of $13 million in 2002 due to an increase in vacation weeks sold, primarily attributable to improved marketing efforts. Timeshare subscription and transaction revenues within our timeshare exchange business increased $29 million (7%) primarily due to increases in exchange transactions and the average exchange fee. During 2002, we recognized an incremental $14 million of income from providing the financing on timeshare unit sales at our Fairfield subsidiary. The additional financing income was generated as a result of a 9% increase in the volume of contracts sold and a greater margin realized on contract sales as we benefited from a lower interest rate environment in 2002 compared with 2001.

Results within our lodging franchise operation continued to be suppressed during 2002, subsequent to the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks and their impact on an already weakening travel industry. Accordingly, royalties, marketing fund and reservations revenues within our lodging franchise operations were down $10 million (3%) in 2002 compared with 2001 and initial franchise fees were down $7 million over the same periods. However, comparable year-over-year occupancy levels in our franchised lodging brands have shown improvement during 2002. In addition, Preferred Alliance revenues and Adjusted EBITDA declined $9 million in 2002 compared with 2001, primarily from contract expirations and a contract termination payment received in the prior year. Adjusted

Further contributing to the increase in EBITDA increasedis a benefit of $20 million from a venture master license agreement with Marriott International, Inc. entered into during 2002, which converted the ownership of a third party license agreement. Upon the change in ownership, the license fee, formerly

51


included within operating expenses, is now recorded as a minority interest expense.expense (below EBITDA). EBITDA in this segment also benefited in 2002 from the absence of $62 million of charges incurred during 2002 primarily in connection with the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks ($51 million principally related to restructuring and other initiatives and $11 million related to the impairment of a lodging investment). Excluding

56



acquisitions, operating and administrative expenses within this segment increased approximately $47 million in 2002 principally to support continued volume-related growth in our timeshare exchange business throughout 2002 compared to 2001.

Travel Distribution Services

Revenues and Adjusted EBITDA increased $1.3 billion and $416$448 million, respectively, in 2002 compared with 2001, due to the October 2001 acquisitions of Galileo and Cheap Tickets. The Galileo acquisition for the nine months ended September 30, 2002 (the period in which no comparable results were included in 2001) contributed incremental revenues and Adjusted EBITDA of $1.2 billion and $410 million, respectively, while Cheap Tickets contributed incremental revenues of $36 million and Adjusted EBITDA losses of $7 million over the same period. In addition, during the summer of 2002, we acquired Lodging.com and Trust International, two companies that supply reservation and distribution solution services to the hospitality industry. Lodging.com and Trust International's operating results were included from the acquisition dates forward and collectively contributed revenue of $16 million with no contribution to Adjusted EBITDA during 2002. Excluding the incremental contributions from the above-mentioned acquisitions, revenues and Adjusted EBITDA of this segment increased $7 million and $13$45 million, respectively, in 2002 compared with 2001.

Galileo subscriber fees and Adjusted EBITDA increased $26 million and $3 million, respectively, during 2002 due to the acquisition of national distribution companies (NDC's)("NDCs") in Europe. NDC'sNDCs are independent organizations that market and sell Galileo global distribution and computer reservation services to travel agents and other subscribers. Partially offsetting this increase was a decline of $15 million in revenues generated from our travel agency business due to reductions in commission rates paid by the airlines, available net rate air inventory and members of travel-related clubs which are serviced by us.

EBITDA in this segment also benefited in 2002 from the absence of $23 million of charges incurred during 2001 in connection with the acquisitions of Galileo and Cheap Tickets.

Beginning with the fourth quarter 2002, all quarterly periods became comparable in terms of being subsequent to the acquisitions of Galileo and Cheap Tickets and the September 2001 terrorist attacks. In fourth quarter 2002, Galileo air travel booking fees were relatively constant, compared with fourth quarter 2001, as a 5% increase in booking volumes was substantially offset by a 4% decline in the effective yield per booking. The decline in effective yield was heavily influenced by unusually high cancellation and re-booking activity in the fourth quarter of 2001 due to the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks. Adjusted EBITDA in fourth quarter 2002 (the period comparable with 2001) includes cost savings of approximately $10 million that were realized in connection with the integration of the Galileo and Cheap Tickets businesses, including cost reduction efforts that were initiated during fourth quarter 2001 to reflect expected business volumes subsequent to the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks. Despite a rebound in travel post September 11, 2001, our travel-related booking volumes have not yet reached pre-September 11, 2001 levels.

Approximately 11% of Galileo's GDS (global distribution services) revenue is generated by United Air Lines, Inc., the largest single travel supplier utilizing Galileo's systems. In December 2002, UAL Corporation, the parent of United Air Lines, filed for bankruptcy protection. We do not expect to incur any material losses due to non-payment by United Air Lines of amounts outstanding as our contracts were granted approval for payment. However, if UAL does not successfully emerge from this bankruptcy, we would not expect to recover amounts outstanding, which could approximate $30 million, and we would expect that certain of Galileo's contributions to revenues (such as revenue derived from Web site and reservation hosting) would be negatively impacted in future periods. During 2002, we generated approximately $95 million of such revenues (primarily on a cost-plus basis) from these activities with United Air Lines. We would not expect this bankruptcy to have a material impact to any of our other revenue streams.

Vehicle Services

Revenues and Adjusted EBITDA increased $853$872 million (26%) and $118$182 million (41%(81%), respectively, in 2002 versus the comparable prior year. Principally driving these increases were the incremental contributions made by Avis Group Holdings, Inc. (comprised of the Avis rental car business and our fleet management operations), which we acquired on March 1, 2001. Prior to the acquisition of Avis, revenues

52


and Adjusted EBITDA of this segment consisted of franchise royalties received from Avis and earnings (losses) from our equity investment in Avis. Avis' operating results were included from the acquisition date forward and therefore included ten months of results in 2001 (March through December). Accordingly, the Avis acquisition for January and February of 2002 (the period for which no comparable results were included in 2001) contributed incremental revenues and Adjusted EBITDA of $562$575 million and $5$6 million, respectively. Additionally, the operating results of Budget were also included from the acquisition date of November 22, 2002 forward and contributed revenues and Adjusted EBITDA of $161$164 million and $6 million, respectively, in 2002.

57


On a comparable basis, postexcluding the acquisition of Budget (ten months ended December 31, 2002 versus the comparable prior year period), revenues and Adjusted EBITDA increased $131$133 million and $106$162 million, respectively.

For the ten months ended December 31, 2002, Avis car rental revenues increased $164$157 million (8%(7%) over the comparable period in 2001, primarily due to a 7% increase in time and mileage revenue per rental day. A majority of the increase in time and mileage revenue per rental day was supported by an increase in pricing, the impact of which substantially flows to Adjusted EBITDA, and an increased share of domestic airport revenue generated by car rental companies. The increase in Adjusted EBITDA was principally supported by the gross margin on the revenue growth. Avis' revenues are primarily derived from car rentals at airport locations. Through November 2002 (the last period for which information is available), approximately 84% of Avis' revenues were generated from car rental locations at airports. Avis increased its share of total car rental revenues generated at domestic airports through November 2002 to 23.7% compared with a 22.5% share over the same eleven month period last year and has recognized airport revenue share gains in consecutive months since February 2002. For the eleven months ended November 30, 2002, Avis realized a 3.5% increase in its comparable year-over-year domestic airport revenues versus a total market segment decline of 1.6% over the same periods. Based on our accumulation of data thus far pertaining to December 2002, we do not expect any significant change in this favorable trend of increased market share for December 2002, once industry data for December 2002 is complete.

In our vehicle leasing and fleet management program businesses, revenues collectively declined $25 million (2%) during the comparable ten months ended December 31, 2002 compared with 2001, principally due to lower interest expense on vehicle funding, which is substantially passed through to clients and therefore results in lower revenues but has minimal Adjusted EBITDA impact. This was partially offset by an increase in depreciation on leased vehicles which is also passed through to clients. EBITDA for this segment also benefited in 2002 from the absence of $58 million of charges recorded in 2001 primarily in connection with restructuring and other initiatives undertaken as a result of the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks.

Financial Services

Adjusted EBITDA increased $139$151 million (45%(51%) in 2002 compared with 2001, despite a $77 million (5%) decrease in revenue. Adjusted EBITDA was favorably impacted by the outsourcing of our individual membership business, in which a net decline of $143 million in membership-related revenues (net of $6 million of royalty income from Trilegiant) due to a lower membership base was more than offset by a net reduction in expenses from servicing fewer members and not directly incurring the cost of marketing to solicit new members (see "Liquidity and Capital Resources—Trilegiant Corporation" for a detailed discussion of our outsourcing arrangement with Trilegiant).members. Marketing expenses decreased by $122 million in 2002 compared with 2001 due to a reduction in new member marketing costs in 2002. In addition, during fourth quarter 2001, Trilegiant increased its solicitation efforts and incurred $56 million of marketing costs that we were contractually required to fund and, as such, expense. In addition, membership operating expenses decreased by approximately $110 million due to cost savings from servicing fewer members. In connection with the Trilegiant transaction, during theDuring third quarter of last year,2001, we incurred $41 million of transaction-related expenses in connection with the outsourcing of our membership business to Trilegiant, the absence of which in the current year2002 also contributed to the increase in Adjusted EBITDA.

Jackson Hewitt generated incremental revenues of $81 million in 2002. In January 2002, we acquired our largest tax preparation franchisee, Tax Services of America ("TSA"). TSA contributed incremental revenues of $42 million and Adjusted EBITDA of approximately $4 million (net of intercompany royalties) to Jackson Hewitt's 2002 results. Jackson Hewitt also generated incremental revenues of $33 million in 2002 from various financial products. Additionally, on a comparable basis, including post-acquisition intercompany royalties paid by TSA, Jackson Hewitt franchise royalties increased $14 million (30%). The

53


increase in Jackson Hewitt royalties was driven by a 13% increase in tax return volume, and a 15% increase in the average price per return. Additional operating and overhead costs were incurred in 2002 due to an expansion of Jackson Hewitt's infrastructure to support increased business activity and a reorganization and relocation of the Jackson Hewitt technology group.

Our domestic insurance/wholesale businesses generated $14 million less revenue in 2002 compared with 2001 from a lower profit share from insurance companies as a result of higher than expected claims. This

58



was offset by growth within our international loyalty solutions operations. Partially offsetting the decline in EBITDA for this segment was a benefit in 2002 from the absence of $10 million of charges recorded in 2001 in connection with restructuring and other initiatives undertaken as a result of the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks.

Corporate and Other

Revenue and Adjusted EBITDA decreased $45 million and $25EBITDA increased $182 million respectively, in 2002 compared with 2001. In February 2001, we sold our real estate Internet portal, move.com, and certain ancillary businesses, the operations of which collectively accounted for a year-over-year decline in revenues of $14 million and an improvement in Adjusted EBITDA of $8$7 million. In addition, revenuesRevenues recognized from providing electronic reservation processing services to Avis prior to the acquisition of Avis resulted in a $15 million revenue decrease with no Adjusted EBITDA impact as Avis paid royalties but was billed for reservation services at cost. Revenues also included incremental inter-segment revenue eliminations in 2002 due to increased intercompany business activities, principally resulting from acquisitions. Adjusted EBITDA also includes higher unallocated corporate overhead costs due to increased administrative expenses and infrastructure expansion to support company growth.

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS—2001 vs. 2000

Our consolidated resultsbenefited in 2002 from continuing operations comprised the following:

 
 2001
 2000
 Change
 
Net revenues $8,613 $4,320 $4,293 
  
 
 
 
Expenses, excluding other charges and non-program related interest, net  7,003  3,056  3,947 
Other charges  671  111  560 
Non-program related interest, net  252  152  100 
  
 
 
 
Total expenses  7,926  3,319  4,607 
  
 
 
 
Gains on dispositions of businesses  443  37  406 
  
 
 
 
Losses on dispositions of businesses  (26) (45) 19 
  
 
 
 
Impairment of investments  (441)   (441)
  
 
 
 
Income before income taxes, minority interest and equity in Homestore  663  993  (330)
Provision for income taxes  220  341  (121)
Minority interest, net of tax  24  83  (59)
Losses related to equity in Homestore, net of tax  77    77 
  
 
 
 
Income from continuing operations $342 $569 $(227)
  
 
 
 

Net revenues and total expenses increased $4.3 billion and $4.6 billion, respectively,$453 million of losses recorded during 2001, primarily duewhich were principally related to the acquisitionsimpairment of our investment in Homestore. Partially offsetting this improvement was the absence in 2002 of a gain of $436 million that was recorded in 2001 in connection with the sale of our real estate Internet portal. EBITDA for this segment also benefited in 2002 from the absence of the following businesses which contributed incremental revenues and expenses aggregating $4.0 billion and $3.8 billion, respectively:

Acquired Business

 Date of Acquisition
 Incremental
Contribution to
Net Revenues

 Incremental
Contribution to
Total Expenses

 
Avis Group Holdings, Inc. March 2001 $3,093 $3,096(a)
Fairfield Resorts, Inc. April 2001  568  451 
Galileo International, Inc. October 2001  337  256 
    
 
 
Total Contributions   $3,998 $3,803 
    
 
 

(a)
Excludes $58 million of restructuring and other unusual charges and $5 million of acquisition and integration related costs.

54


In addition to the contributions made by acquired businesses, net revenues were favorably impacted by growth primarily within our Real Estate Services segment (exclusive of acquisitions). For a detailed discussion of revenue trends, see below.

Also contributing to the increase in total expenses recorded during 2001 was an increase of $560 million in other charges as follows:

 
 2001
 2000
 Change
Restructuring and other unusual(a) $379 $109 $270
Acquisitions and integration related(b)  112    112
Mortgage servicing rights impairment(c)  94    94
Litigation and related(d)  86  2  84
  
 
 
Total other charges(e) $671 $111 $560
  
 
 

(a)
The 2001 charges primarily related to2001: (i) restructuring initiatives undertaken in response to the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks ($192 million), (ii) the funding of an irrevocable contribution to the Real Estate Technology Trust ($95 million), (iii) the funding of Trip Network ($85 million) and (iv) a contribution to the Cendant Charitable Foundation ($7 million). The 2000 charges primarily related to (i) restructuring initiatives undertaken to consolidate business operations and rationalize certain existing processes ($60 million), (ii) the fundingoutsourcing of an irrevocable contribution to the Hospitality Technology Trust ($21 million), (iii) executive termination costs ($11 million), (iv) the abandonment of certain computer system applications ($7 million) and (iv) stock option contract modifications and the postponement of the initial public offering of Move.com common stock ($6 million).
(b)
The 2001 charges primarily related to (i) outsourcing our information technology operationoperations to IBM in connection with the acquisition of Galileo ($78 million), (ii) integrating our existing travel agency businesses with Galileo's computerized reservations system ($23 million) and (iii) severance in connection with the rationalization of duplicative functions ($4 million).
(c)
The 2001 charge was incurred in connection with unprecedented rate reductions subsequent to the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks that we deemed not to be in the ordinary course of business.
(d)
The 2001 and 2000 charges were incurred in connection with settlements or investigations relating to the 1998 discovery of accounting irregularities in the former business units of CUC. The 2001 and 2000 charges were partially offset by non-cash credits of $14 million and $41 million, respectively, to reflect adjustments to the PRIDES class action litigation settlement charge we recorded in 1998.
(e)
See Note 7—Other Charges (Credits) to our Consolidated Financial Statements for a detailed description of each charge.

Additionally, our 2001 and 2000 operating results were impacted by gains and losses related to the dispositions of businesses and, for 2001, also by losses related to the impairment of investments. During 2001, these events resulted in (i) $443 million of gains primarily related to the sale of our real estate Internet portal ($436 million), (ii) $26 million of losses related to the dispositions of non-strategic businesses and (iii) $441 million of losses related to the impairment of our investments in Homestore ($407 million) and lodging and Internet-related businesses ($34 million). During 2000, the dispositions of businesses resulted in (i) $37 million of gains primarily related to the recognition of a deferred gain resulting from the 1999 sale of our fleet businesses and (ii) $45 million of losses on the dispositions of other non-strategic businesses.

Our overall effective tax rate was 33.2% and 34.3% for 2001 and 2000, respectively. The effective rate for 2001 was lower as the benefit from the recognition of foreign tax credits exceeded the negative impact of acquisitions.

Our 2001 operating results benefited by $59 million less minority interest as a result of the maturity of the Feline PRIDES in February 2001. However, our 2001 operating results were negatively impacted by after-tax losses of $77 million related to our equity ownership in Homestore.

As a result of the above-mentioned items, income from continuing operations decreased $227 million, or 40%, during 2001.

Discussed below are the operating results for each of our segments, which focuses on revenues and Adjusted EBITDA. Adjusted EBITDA is defined as earnings before non-program related interest, income taxes, non-program related depreciation and amortization, minority interest and, in 2001, equity in

55



Homestore. Such measure is then adjusted to exclude items that are of a non-recurring or unusual nature and are also not measured in assessing segment performance. In accordance with SFAS No. 131, "Disclosures About Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information," our management believes such discussions are the most informative representation of how management evaluates performance. However, our presentation of Adjusted EBITDA may not be comparable with similar measures used by other companies. The footnotes to the table presented below describe the items that have been excluded from Adjusted EBITDA.

 
 Revenues
 Adjusted EBITDA
 
 
 2001
 2000
 % Change
 2001(a)
 2000(b)
 % Change
 
Real Estate Services(c) $1,859 $1,461 27%$939 $752 25%
Hospitality(d)  1,522  918 66  513  385 33 
Travel Distribution(e)  437  99 *  108  10 * 
Vehicle Services(f)  3,322  230 *  290  169 * 
Financial Services  1,402  1,380 2  310  373 (17)
  
 
   
 
   
Total Reportable Segments  8,542  4,088    2,160  1,689   
Corporate and Other(g)  71  232 *  (73) (104)* 
  
 
   
 
   
Total Company $8,613 $4,320    2,087  1,585   
  
 
           
Less: Non-program related depreciation and amortization          477  321   
Less: Other charges:                 
 Acquisition and integration related costs          112     
 Litigation and related costs          86  2   
 Restructuring and other unusual charges          379  109   
 Mortgage servicing rights impairment          94     
Less: Non-program related interest, net          252  152   
Plus: Gains on dispositions of businesses          443  37   
Less: Losses on dispositions of businesses          26  45   
Less: Impairment of investments          441     
          
 
   
Income before income taxes, minority interest and equity in Homestore         $663 $993   
          
 
   

*
Not meaningful.
(a)
Adjusted EBITDA excludes charges of $192 million incurred primarily in connection with restructuring and other initiatives undertaken as a result of the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks ($31 million, $51 million, $58 million, $7 million, $10 million and $35 million of charges were recorded within Real Estate Services, Hospitality, Vehicle Services, Travel Distribution, Financial Services and Corporate and Other, respectively)35 million).
(b)
Adjusted EBITDA excludes charges of $109 million in connection with restructuring and other initiatives ($2 million, $63 million, $31 million and $13 million of charges were recorded within Real Estate Services, Hospitality, Financial Services and Corporate and Other, respectively).
(c)
Adjusted EBITDA for 2001 excludes charges of $95 million related to the funding of an irrevocable contribution to the Real Estate Technology Trust and $94 million related to the impairment of our mortgage servicing rights asset.
(d)
Adjusted EBITDA for 2001 excludes a charge of $11 million related to the impairment of investments due in part to the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks. Adjusted EBITDA for 2000 excludes $12 million of losses related to the dispositions of businesses.
(e)
Adjusted EBITDA for 2001 excludes charges of $23 million related to the acquisition and integration of Cheap Tickets.
(f)
Adjusted EBITDA for 2001 excludes charges of $5 million related to the acquisition and integration of Avis and $2 million related to the impairment of investments due to the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks.
(g)
Represents the results of operations of our non-strategic businesses, unallocated corporate overhead and the elimination of transactions between segments. Adjusted EBITDA for 2001 excludes charges of (i) $427 million primarily related to the impairment of our investment in Homestore, (ii) $100 million for litigation and related costs, (iii) $85 million related to the funding of Trip Network, (iv) $78 million related to the outsourcing of our information technology operations to IBM in connection with the acquisition of Galileo, (v) $26 million related to the dispositions of non-strategic businesses in 1999, (vi) $7 million related to a non-cash contribution to the Cendant Charitable Foundation and (vii) $4 million related to the

56


Real Estate Services

Revenues and Adjusted EBITDA increased $398 million (27%) and $187 million (25%), respectively. The increase in operating results was primarily driven by substantial growth in mortgage loans sold due to increased refinancing activity and purchase volume. Higher franchise fees from our Century 21, Coldwell Banker and ERA franchise brands and increases in relocation services also contributed to the favorable operating results. Offsetting the revenue increases, operating and administrative expenses within this segment increased $208 million primarily to support the higher volume of mortgage originations and related servicing activities.

Collectively, mortgage loans sold increased $14.8 billion (70%) to $35.9 billion, generating incremental revenues of $367 million, a 117% increase. Closed mortgage loans increased $22.4 billion (101%) to $44.5 billion in 2001. Such growth consisted of a $17.6 billion increase (approximately ten-fold) in refinancings and a $4.8 billion increase (24%) in purchase mortgage closings. A significant portion of mortgage loans closed in any quarter will generate revenues in future periods as those loans closed are packaged and sold and revenue is recognized upon the sale of the loan, which is typically 45 to 60 days after closing. Beginning in January 2001, Merrill Lynch outsourced its mortgage loan origination and servicing operations to us under a 10-year agreement, which accounted for $7.4 billion (17%) of our mortgage closings in 2001. Consideration paid to Merrill Lynch for this outsourcing agreement was not material. Partially offsetting record production revenues was a $26 million (24%) decline in net loan servicing revenue. The average servicing portfolio grew $28 billion (45%) resulting from the high volume of mortgage loan originations and our purchase of rights to service $11 billion of existing mortgage loans owned by Merrill Lynch; however, accelerated servicing amortization expenses during 2001, due primarily to refinancing activity, more than offset the increase in recurring servicing fees from the portfolio growth.

Franchise fees from our real estate franchise brands also contributed to revenue and Adjustedsuch year-over-year EBITDA growth. Royalties and other franchise fees increased $41 million (8%), despite only modest industry-wide growth and a year-over-year industry decline in California, principally due to a 4% increase in the average price of homes sold and a $16 million fee received from NRT in connection with the termination of a franchise agreement under which NRT operated our Century 21 real estate brand. Service-based fees from relocation activities also contributed to the increase in revenues and Adjusted EBITDA principally due to a $14 million increase in referral fees resulting from increased volume, which included the execution of new service contracts. In addition, asset-based relocation revenues decreased by $3 million, which was comprised of a $10 million revenue decline due to lower corporate and government homesale closings, partially offset by a $7 million increase in net interest income from relocation operations due to reduced debt levels in 2001.

57


Hospitality

Revenues and Adjusted EBITDA increased $604 million (66%) and $128 million (33%), respectively. While our April 2001 acquisition of Fairfield produced the bulk of this growth, our pre-existing timeshare exchange operations also made contributions. Prior to the acquisition of Fairfield, the results of this segment consisted principally of royalties earned on our lodging brands and exchange fees earned from our timeshare exchange business, Resort Condominium International, LLC. Fairfield contributed revenues and Adjusted EBITDA of $568 million and $144 million, respectively, during 2001. In addition, the first quarter 2001 acquisition of Holiday Cottages Group Limited, the leading UK brand in self-catering vacation home rentals, contributed incremental revenues and Adjusted EBITDA of $34 million and $13 million, respectively, in 2001. Notwithstanding the negative impact that the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks had on the economy's travel sector, timeshare subscription and transaction fees increased $41 million supported by increases in both members and exchange transactions. A corresponding increase in timeshare-related staffing costs was incurred to support volume growth and meet anticipated service levels. Revenues and Adjusted EBITDA in this segment include a decline in preferred alliance fees of $8 million, principally due to the expiration of a vendor contract in 2000. Royalties, marketing fund and reservations revenues from our lodging franchise operations declined $13 million (6%) and $14 million (7%), respectively, due to a 7% decrease in revenue per available room. Lower marketing fund revenues received from franchiseesbenefits were offset by lower expenses incurred on the marketing of our nine lodging brands. The September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks caused a decline in the occupancy levels and room rates of our franchised lodging properties in the fourth quarter of 2001.

Travel Distribution

Prior to the acquisitions of Galileo and Cheap Tickets, revenue and Adjusted EBITDA for this segment principally comprised the operations of Cendant Travel, our travel agent subsidiary. Galileo contributed revenues and Adjusted EBITDA of $337 million and $104 million, respectively, while Cheap Tickets contributed revenues and expenses of $8 million each and made no contribution to Adjusted EBITDA. The September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks caused a decline in demand for travel-related services and, accordingly, reduced the booking volumes for Galileo and our travel agency businesses below fourth quarter 2000 levels. Galileo worldwide booking volume for air travel declined 19% in fourth quarter 2001 compared with fourth quarter 2000 and other travel-related bookings (car, hotel, etc.) were down 23% for the comparable periods. Upon completing the acquisitions of Galileo and Cheap Tickets, in response to the existing economic conditions, we not only moved aggressively to integrate these businesses and achieve expected synergies, but we also re-examined their cost structures and streamlined their operations through workforce reductions and other means to meet expected business volumes.

Vehicle Services

Revenues and Adjusted EBITDA increased $3.1 billion and $121 million, respectively, substantially due to the acquisition of Avis in March 2001. Prior to the acquisition of Avis, revenues and Adjusted EBITDA of this segment consisted principally of earnings from our 18% equity investment in Avis and franchise royalties received from Avis. The acquisition of Avis contributed incremental revenues and Adjusted EBITDA of $3.1 billion and $112 million, respectively, in 2001. Avis' results in 2001 were negatively impacted by reduced demand at airport locations due to a general decline in commercial travel throughout the year, which was further exacerbated by the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks. In response to the slowdown in commercial travel and in the wake of the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks, we believe that we have rightsized our car rental operations to meet anticipated business levels, which included reductions in workforce and fleet (fleet was downsized by approximately 10%). Our fleet management and fuel card management businesses were not materially impacted by the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks.

Financial Services

Revenues increased $22 million (2%) while Adjusted EBITDA decreased $63 million (17%). While the royalties we will receive from Trilegiant will benefit segment results in future periods, the outsourcing of

58



our individual membership business to Trilegiant caused a decrease in Adjusted EBITDA during 2001, largely due to $41 million of our transaction-related expenses and $66 million of marketing spending by Trilegiant, which we were contractually required to fund and, as such, expensed (see discussion in "Liquidity and Capital Resources—Trilegiant Corporation"). The transaction related expenses are comprised of the $20 million write-off of the entire amount of our preferred stock investment due to operating losses incurred by Trilegiant in excess of the common equity and other expenses that include employee benefits and professional fees and a portion of the marketing advance that was expensed as Trilegiant incurred qualified marketing expenses pursuant to the contractual terms of the agreement. Membership volumes and revenues declined; however, commissions increased due to higher commission rates. Conversely, the cost savings from servicing fewer members, as well as Trilegiant's absorption of its share of fixed overhead expenses subsequent to the outsourcing, more than offset the lower membership revenues and higher commissions. In addition, we acquired Netmarket, an online membership business, during fourth quarter 2000, which was immediately integrated into our existing membership business. Netmarket contributed incremental revenues of $53 million in 2001. Jackson Hewitt, our tax preparation franchise business, contributed incremental revenues of $18 million, principally comprised of higher royalties due to a 22% increase in tax return volume, with relatively no corresponding increases in expenses due to the significant operating leverage within our franchise operations. Revenues and Adjusted EBITDA in 2000 included $8 million of fees recognized from the sale of certain referral agreements.

Corporate and Other

Revenues decreased $161 million while Adjusted EBITDA increased $31 million. Our real estate Internet portal and certain ancillary businesses, which were sold to Homestore in February 2001, collectively accounted for a decline in revenues of $87 million and an improvement to Adjusted EBITDA of $82 million because we were investing in the development and marketing of the portal during 2000. Revenues and Adjusted EBITDA were negatively impacted by $36 million less income from financial investments. In addition, revenues recognized from providing electronic reservation processing services to Avis ceased coincident with our acquisition of Avis, contributing to a reduction in revenues of $43 million with no Adjusted EBITDA impact since Avis had been billed for such services at cost. In December 2001, we entered into a ten-year, information technology services relationship with IBM whereby IBM will manage substantially all of our domestic data center operations. Adjusted EBITDA in 2001 benefited from the absence of $13 million of costs incurred in 2000 to pursue Internet initiatives and also reflects increased unallocated corporate overhead costs principallyin 2002 due to increased administrative expenses and infrastructure expansion to support company growth.


FINANCIAL CONDITION, LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

The majorityWe present separately the financial data of our businesses operatemanagement and mortgage programs. These programs are distinct from our other activities as the assets are generally funded through the issuance of debt that is collateralized by such assets. Specifically, in environments where we are paid a fee for services provided. Within our carvehicle rental, vehiclefleet management, relocation, mortgage services and timeshare developmentvacation ownership businesses, we purchase assets or finance the purchase of assets on behalf of our clients. Assets generated in this process are classified as assets under management and mortgage programs are funded through either borrowings under asset-backed funding arrangements or unsecured borrowings at our PHH subsidiary. Such borrowings are classified as debt under management and mortgage programs. We seek to offset the interest rate exposures inherent inThe income generated by these assets by matching them with financial liabilities that have similar term and interest rate characteristics. As a result, we minimize the interest rate risk associated with managing these assets and create greater certainty around the financial income that they produce. Fees generated from our clients areis used, in part, to repay the interestprincipal and principalinterest associated with the financial liabilities. Funding for our assets under management and mortgage programs is also provided by both unsecured borrowings and secured financing arrangements, which are classified as liabilities under management and mortgage programs, as well as securitization facilities with special purpose entities.debt. Cash inflows and outflows relating to the generation or acquisition of such assets and the principal debt repayment or financing of such assets are classified as activities of our management and mortgage programs. Our finance activities vary from the rest of our businesses based upon the impact of the relative business and financial risks and asset attributes, as well as the nature and timing associated with the respective cash flows. Accordingly, weWe believe that it is appropriate to segregate the financial data of our assets under management and mortgage programs and our liabilities under management and mortgage programs separately from the assets and

59



liabilities of the rest of our businesses because, ultimately, the source of repayment of such liabilitiesdebt is the realization of such assets.

FINANCIAL CONDITION


 2002
 2001
 Change
  2003
 2002
 Change
 
Total assets exclusive of assets under management and mortgage programs $20,889 $21,676 $(787) $21,444 $20,717 $727 
Total liabilities exclusive of liabilities under management and mortgage programs 12,443 15,207 (2,764) 12,743 12,443 300 
Assets under management and mortgage programs 15,008 11,868 3,140 
 

17,593

 

15,180

 

2,413

 
Liabilities under management and mortgage programs 13,764 10,894 2,870 
 

16,108

 

13,764

 

2,344

 
Mandatorily redeemable preferred securities 375 375  

Mandatorily redeemable preferred interest in a subsidiary

 


 

375

 

(375

)
Stockholders' equity 9,315 7,068 2,247 
 

10,186

 

9,315

 

871

 

59


Total assets exclusive of assets under management and mortgage programs decreasedincreased primarily due to (i) the application of $1.4 billion of prior payments made to the stockholder litigation settlement trust to extinguish the remaining portion of our principal stockholder litigation settlement liability, (ii) the sale of $1.3 billion of NCP assetsincreases in cash and (iii) a $1.8 billion reduction in cash equivalents (see "Liquidity and Capital Resources—Cash Flows" below for a detailed discussiondiscussion) and goodwill, which primarily resulted from current period acquisitions and the ultimate settlement of such reduction)tax bases on prior period acquisitions with the tax authorities (see Note 5 to our Consolidated Financial Statements). Such decreasesincreases were partially offset by (i) a $3.1 billion net increasereduction in goodwilltimeshare-related inventory as a result of a reclassification to assets under management and other intangiblemortgage programs, as such assets resultingwere financed under a program during first quarter 2003; (ii) a decrease in non-current deferred income taxes primarily from the acquisitions of NRT, Trendwest and the assets of Budget and (ii) various other increases in assets resulting from the impactutilization of acquired businesses. For a detailed discussionportion of our net operating loss carryforward and the activityultimate settlements with tax authorities discussed above and ending balance(iii) the sale of goodwill, see Notes 3 and 12 toreal estate in the normal course of our Consolidated Financial Statements.mortgage services business.

Total liabilities exclusive of liabilities under management and mortgage programs decreased primarily due to (i) the extinguishment of our $2.85 billion stockholder litigation settlement liability and (ii) the repurchase/redemption of approximately $1.3 billion of debt securities (see "Liquidity and Capital Resources—Corporate Indebtedness"). Such decreases were partially offset by (i) $600 million of borrowings drawn under our $2.9 billion revolving credit facility during 2002 and (ii) various other increases in liabilities resulting from the impact of acquired businesses.

Assets under management and mortgage programs increased primarily due to (i) an increase in deferred income principally resulting from the consolidation of $2.8 billionTrilegiant and (ii) gains on derivatives we use to hedge the interest rate risk associated with our outstanding corporate indebtedness, which are deferred and will be recognized over future periods as an offset to interest expense. Such increases were offset by a net reduction in vehiclesoutstanding corporate debt (see "Liquidity and Capital Resources—Financial Obligations—Corporate Indebtedness" for a detailed account of this reduction).

Assets under management and mortgage programs increased primarily due to growth in our mortgage and vehicle businesses, the acquisitionimpact of FIN 46 and the assetsimpact of Budget, (ii) anchanges to the underlying structures of certain of our securitization facilities. Specifically contributing to the increase of $460 millionwere increases in timeshare receivables primarily resulting from the acquisitions of Trendwest and Equivest and (iii) an increase of $679 million in(i) our mortgage loans held for sale primarilyprincipally due to timing differences arising between the originationconsolidation of Bishop's Gate Residential Mortgage Trust; (ii) our MSR asset principally resulting from an increase in the aggregate amount of the mortgage portfolio we service; (iii) our relocation receivables principally due to the consolidation of Apple Ridge Funding LLC; (iv) our timeshare-related assets principally resulting from the consolidation of the Sierra Receivable Funding entities, the acquisition of FFD Development Company, LLC and salesthe reclassification of such loans. Such increases were partially offset by (i) a decrease of $507 million in restricted cashtimeshare-related inventory (referred to above) and (v) our vehicle-related assets primarily due to the utilization of such amounts for the acquisitionpurchase of vehicles used in our vehicle rental operations. See "Liquidity and (ii)Capital Resources—Financial Obligations—Debt under Management and Mortgage Programs" for a net reductionmore extensive discussion regarding the impact of $272 millionFIN 46 and the changes to our mortgage servicing rights asset (including the related derivatives) due to valuation adjustmentsunderlying structures of Apple Ridge and related amortization, net of additions.the Sierra entities.

Liabilities under management and mortgage programs increased primarily due to issuancesthe consolidation of Bishop's Gate, the Sierra entities and Apple Ridge and additional debt during 2002borrowings to financesupport the growth in our portfolio of assets under management and mortgage programs, as discussed above (see "Liquidity and Capital Resources—Financial Obligations—Debt Related toUnder Management and Mortgage Programs" for a detailed descriptionaccount of the change in debt related to management and mortgage programs).

The decrease in mandatorily redeemable preferred interest represents our prepayment of these securities in September 2003.

Stockholders' equity increased primarily due to (i) $846$1,172 million of net income generated during 2002 (excluding the $245 million reclassification of non-cash foreign currency translation losses realized upon the sale of NCP),2003, (ii) the issuance of $916 million (47.4 million shares) in CD common stock in connection with the Trendwest acquisition, (iii) the issuance of $216 million (11.5 million shares) in CD common stock in connection with the acquisition of NRT, (iv) $98 million relating to the sale of subsidiary stock in connection with our venture with Marriott and (v) $124$540 million related to the exercise of employee stock

60



options. options (including $106 million of tax benefit) and (iii) $143 million of favorable foreign currency translation adjustments. Such increases were partially offset by our repurchase of $291$1,099 million (19.8(65 million shares) in CD common stock, of which $288 million was repurchased using cash.stock.

LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

Our principal sources of liquidity are cash on hand and our ability to generate cash through operations and financing activities, as well as available creditfunding arrangements and securitizationcommitted credit facilities, each of which is discussed below.

60


CASH FLOWS

At December 31, 2002,2003, we had $126$840 million of cash on hand, a decreasean increase of approximately $1.8 billion$714 million from approximately $1.9 billion$126 million at December 31, 2001 reflecting, in part, management's efforts to apply our cash balances to reduce outstanding indebtedness and liabilities.2002. The following table summarizes such decrease:increase:



 Year Ended December 31,
 
 Year Ended December 31,
 


 2002
 2001
 Change
 
 2003
 2002
 Change
 
Cash provided by (used in):Cash provided by (used in):        Cash provided by (used in):        
Operating activities $1,257(a)$2,787 $(1,530)Operating activities $7,202 $1,077(a)$6,125 
Investing activities (1,917)(b) (6,457) 4,540 Investing activities (3,400) (1,747)(b) (1,653)
Financing activities (1,271) 4,643 (5,914)Financing activities (3,081) (1,261) (1,820)
Effects of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalentsEffects of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents 41  (8) 49 Effects of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents (7) 41  (48)
Cash provided by discontinued operationsCash provided by discontinued operations 74  121 (47)Cash provided by discontinued operations  74  (74)
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
Net change in cash and cash equivalentsNet change in cash and cash equivalents $(1,816)$1,086 $(2,902)Net change in cash and cash equivalents $714 $(1,816)$2,530 
 
 
 
   
 
 
 

(a)
Includes (i) the 2002 application of prior$1.41 billion of payments made to the stockholder litigation settlement trust of $1.41 billion, the March 2002 payment of $250 millionin 2001 to the trust and the May 2002 payment of $1.2 billion to the trust to fund the remaining balanceextinguish a portion of the principal stockholder litigation settlement liability and (ii) $1.44 billion of payments made during 2002 to extinguish a portion of the principal stockholder litigation settlement liability.
(b)
Includes $1.41 billion of proceeds from the principal stockholder litigation settlement trust, which were used during the same period to extinguish the remaininga portion of the principal stockholder litigation settlement liability.liability, as discussed in (a) above.

During 2002,2003, we generated approximately $1.5$6.1 billion lessmore cash from operating activities as compared to 2002. This change principally reflects the completion of our funding the principal stockholder litigation settlement liability in 2002, as noted in the table above. Excluding the effects of the principal stockholder litigation settlement funding, net cash provided by operating activities increased by approximately $3.3 billion. Such change primarily duerepresents (i) stronger operating results, (ii) better management of our working capital, (iii) proceeds received from the termination of fair value interest rate hedges of corporate debt instruments and (iv) activities of our management and mortgage programs, which produced a larger cash inflow in 2003 resulting primarily from timing differences between the receipt of cash on the sale of previously originated mortgage loans and the origination of new mortgage loans.

During 2003, we used approximately $1.7 billion more cash in investing activities as compared to 2002. This change principally reflects the absence in 2003 of (i) $1.41 billion of cash payments madeproceeds received in prior periods to2002 from the stockholder litigation settlement trust, which represented funds that we deposited to the trust in 2001 that were then used during first quarterin 2002 to extinguishfund the remaining portion of our principal stockholder litigation settlement liability, as discussed above, and (ii) $1.44approximately $1.2 billion in net proceeds received from the May 2002 sale of payments made in 2002 to pay off the remaining balance of the stockholder litigation settlement liability. Partially offsettingour car parking facility business. Excluding these uses were greater operating cash flows generated by our Avis car rental, Galileo and mortgage businesses.

During 2002,amounts, we used approximately $4.5 billion$900 million less cash infor investing activities during 2003 as compared to 2002. This decrease primarily duereflects our decision to (i) the proceeds in 2002 of $1.41 billion of prior payments made to the stockholder litigation settlement trust that were used to extinguish a portion of our stockholder litigation settlement liability, (ii)significantly curtail acquisitions, as evidenced by a reduction of $1.4more than $1 billion in cash used for acquisitions, (iii) thethis purpose. Also contributing to this change were incremental proceeds of $1.2 billion fromreceived in 2003 on the sale of NCPassets, including our investment in Entertainment Publications, Inc. and (iv) the absencesale/leaseback of $1.1 billiontwo of payments madeour facilities. We also increased our capital expenditures in 2001 to the shareholder litigation settlement trust. Partially offsetting the decrease in cash used in investing activities was additional cash used to acquire vehicles for our car rental and fleet management operations.

Capital expenditures during 2002 amounted to $3992003 by $64 million and were utilized to support operational growth and businesses acquired in 2002, and to enhance marketing opportunities and develop operating efficiencies through technological improvements. We anticipate aggregate capital expenditure investments during 2003for 2004 to be in the range of $450$525 million to $480$575 million. We also used $315 million more cash in 2003 compared to 2002 in the investment activities of our management and mortgage programs due primarily to timing differences within our timeshare and relocation programs similar to those discussed above with respect to mortgage activities. The increase in cash utilization was partially offset by a reduction in the year-over-year net cash outflow resulting from investments in and payments received on vehicles.

During 2002,2003, we used approximately $1.3$3.1 billion of net cash in financing activities as compared to generatingusing approximately $4.6$1.3 billion of net cash during 2001. Reflected2002. While we benefited from approximately $2.6 billion of proceeds received during 2003 on the issuance of fixed-rate debt, this cash was deployed primarily to increase debt repayments and share repurchases period-over-period. These actions demonstrate our commitment to reducing outstanding corporate indebtedness and returning shareholder value. Further contributing to this change is an increase of $1.9 billion in the cash we used during 2002 are (i)in the financing activities of our management and mortgage programs, primarily resulting from greater repayments of outstanding borrowings in 2003. See "Liquidity and Capital Resources—Financial Obligations" for a detailed discussion of $750 million under revolving credit facilities at our PHH subsidiary, (ii) debt redemptions of approximately $1.3 billion, which are described in greater detail below (see "Financial Obligations—Corporate Indebtedness") and (iii) stock repurchases of $288 million.financing activities during 2003.

61



Partially offsetting such uses was $600 million of borrowings drawn under our $2.9 billion revolving credit facility during 2002.

We also Throughout 2004, we intend to deploy our available cash to continue to repurchase current maturities of outstandingdemonstrate our commitment to improving our balance sheet by reducing corporate indebtedness and subject to Board approval,repurchasing outstanding shares of our CDcommon stock. In February 2004, virtually all holders of our zero coupon senior convertible contingent notes elected to convert their notes into shares of our common stock. As a result, our corporate indebtedness decreased by an additional $430 million. In order to reduce the impact on our outstanding shares of holders converting these notes into approximately 22 million shares of common stock, beyond the current Board authorized amount. Management currently expectswe intend to use available cash that approximately half of our discretionary cash use during the 2003 fiscal year will be to effect debt repurchases, while the remainder will beotherwise would have been used to acquire complementary businesses andredeem these notes to repurchase outstanding shares. We are also currently analyzing the benefitsa corresponding number of paying dividends onshares of our CD common stock in the future. However, we can make no assurances that either such a dividend will be paidopen market. We currently also expect to use cash to redeem our zero coupon convertible debentures and 37/8% convertible senior debentures on or that we will obtain Board approvalsubsequent to increase our stock repurchase program. Astheir call dates (May 2004 and November 2004, respectively); however, holders of December 31, 2002, we had approximately $171 million of remaining availability under our board-authorized CD common stock repurchase program. During January and February 2003, we repurchased approximately 6.7 millionthese instruments may convert them into shares of our CD common stock forif the price of such stock exceeds the stipulated thresholds (which were not met as of February 27, 2004) or upon the exercise of our call provisions. We also expect to utilize cash during second quarter 2004 to redeem our outstanding 11% senior subordinated notes. Finally, on February 11, 2004, our Board of Directors declared a quarterly cash dividend of $0.07 per share. While we expect to use approximately $77$280 million of cash to pay dividends in cash.2004, although no assurances can be made, we anticipate increasing the dividend over time as our earnings and cash flow grow.

FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS

At December 31, 2002,2003, we had approximately $18.7$20.8 billion of indebtedness (including corporate indebtedness of $5.6$5.1 billion, Upper DECS of $863 million and debt related to ourunder management and mortgage programs of $12.7 billion and our mandatorily redeemable interest of $375 million)$14.8 billion). Our net debt (excluding the Upper DECS and debt related to our management and mortgage programs and net of cash and cash equivalents) to total capital (including net debt and the Upper DECS) ratio was 36% and 37% as of December 31, 2002 and 2001, respectively, and the ratio of Adjusted EBITDA to net non-program related interest expense was 10 to 1 and 8 to 1 for 2002 and 2001, respectively.

Corporate Indebtedness

Corporate indebtedness consisted of:



 Earliest
Mandatory
Redemption
Date

 Final
Maturity
Date

 As of
December 31,
2002

 As of
December 31,
2001

 Change
 
 Earliest
Mandatory
Redemption
Date

 Final
Maturity
Date

 As of
December 31,
2003

 As of
December 31,
2002

 Change
 
Term notesTerm notes              Term notes           
73/4% notes December 2003 December 2003 $ $966 $(966)
67/8% notes August 2006 August 2006 849 849  
61/4% notes January 2008 January 2008 797  797 
73/4% notes December 2003 December 2003 $966 $1,150 $(184)11% senior subordinated notes May 2009 May 2009 333 530 (197)
67/8% notes August 2006 August 2006  850  850   61/4% notes March 2010 March 2010 348  348 
11% senior subordinated notes May 2009 May 2009  530  584  (54)73/8% notes January 2013 January 2013 1,190  1,190 
3% convertible subordinated notes February 2002 February 2002    390  (390)71/8% notes March 2015 March 2015 250  250 
Contingently convertible debt securitiesContingently convertible debt securities              
Contingently convertible debt securities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
Zero coupon convertible debentures May 2003 May 2021  857  1,000  (143)Zero coupon senior convertible contingent notes February 2004 February 2021 430 420 10 
Zero coupon senior convertible contingent notes February 2004 February 2021  420  920  (500)Zero coupon convertible debentures May 2004 May 2021 7 857 (850)
37/8% convertible senior debentures November 2004 November 2011  1,200  1,200   37/8% convertible senior debentures November 2004 November 2011 804 1,200 (396)
OtherOther              
Other

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
Revolver borrowings   December 2005  600    600 Revolver borrowings   December 2005  600 (600)
Net hedging gains (*)      89  11  78 Net hedging gains (*)     31 89 (58)
Other      89  27  62 Other     100 90 10 
     
 
 
       
 
 
 
Total long-term debt, excluding Upper DECS      5,601  6,132  (531)
     5,139 5,601 (462)

Mandatorily redeemable preferred interest in a subsidiary

Mandatorily redeemable preferred interest in a subsidiary

 

 


 

375

 

(375

)
Upper DECSUpper DECS      863  863   Upper DECS     863 863  
     
 
 
       
 
 
 
Total corporate debt, including Upper DECS     $6,464 $6,995 $(531)
     
 
 
       $6,002 $6,839 $(837)
     
 
 
 

(*)
Represents derivativeAs of December 31, 2003, the balance represents $201 million of realized gains resulting from the termination of fair value interest rate hedges, which we will amortize to reduce future interest expense. Such gains are partially offset by $170 million of which $52 million had been realized asmark-to-market adjustments on new fair value interest rate hedges. As of December 31, 2002, the balance represents $51 million of realized gains resulting from the termination of fair value interest rate hedges and will be amortized by us as an offset to$38 million of mark-to-market adjustments on new fair value interest expense over the duration of the hedged debt instruments.rate hedges.

62


The change in our total corporate debt reflects the issuance of $2.6 billion in notes with maturity dates ranging from five to twelve years, the proceeds of which were primarily used to repurchase debt with nearer-term maturities or mandatory redemption provisions. During 2002, our corporate indebtedness decreased $531 million due to (i) the redemption2003, we repurchased/repaid approximately $3.5 billion of our 3%outstanding corporate debt, approximately $1.8 billion of which was scheduled to mature or potentially become due in 2003 (73/4% notes and zero coupon convertible subordinated notesdebentures) and $396 million of which was scheduled to potentially become due in November 2004 (37/8% convertible senior debentures). Through these repurchases, we have not only eliminated a significant liquidity need, we also removed 49.7 million shares of potential dilution from our future earnings per share. The number of shares of common stock potentially issuable for $390 million, (ii) the repurchaseeach of $517 millionour contingently convertible debt securities is detailed below (in millions):

 
 As of
December 31, 2003

 As of
December 31, 2002

 Change
 
Zero coupon senior convertible contingent notes(*) 22.0 22.0  
Zero coupon convertible debentures 0.3 33.5 (33.2)
37/8% convertible senior debentures 33.4 49.9 (16.5)
  
 
 
 
  55.7 105.4 (49.7)
  
 
 
 

(*)
As previously discussed, in February 2004, holders of our zero coupon senior convertible contingent notes withconverted such notes into shares of CD common stock. We intend to use the cash that otherwise would have been used to redeem these notes to repurchase a face valuecorresponding number of approximately $821 million, (iii)shares of CD common stock in the open market.

The 37/8% senior convertible debentures may be converted prior to maturity during each three-month period if the closing sale price of CD common stock exceeds a threshold, which through November 27, 2004 is $28.32. In addition, the holders of the debentures have the right to require us to repurchase of $184 millionthe debentures on November 27, 2004, and we have the right to redeem the debentures at any time after such date, in each case at par plus accrued interest, if any. Although no assurances can be given, it is currently our intention to redeem the remaining debentures for cash following such date. We would expect to have cash on hand, as well as available capacity under our credit facilities in order to fund such redemption. Upon notice of our 73/4% notes, (iv)intent to redeem the repurchase of $143 million of our zero coupon convertibledebentures, the holders will have the right to convert their debentures, and (v)we would expect holders to exercise such conversion right if the repurchaseprice of $26 million of our 11% senior subordinated notes. In connection withCD common stock exceeds $24.05 per share. To the repurchase of these securities,extent that holders convert their debentures, we recorded extraordinary losses of $42 million ($30 million after tax) during 2002. These reductions were partially offset by (i) borrowings of $600 million under our $2.9 billion revolving credit facility, which were primarily usedwould expect to use amounts intended to fund redemptions to repurchase shares of CD common stock in the Budget acquisition and related costs and (ii) other net reductions of $129 million.open market. The significant terms for our outstanding debt instruments at December 31, 20022003 can be found in Note 1815 to our Consolidated Financial Statements.

Subsequent to December 31, 2002, we issued $800 million of five-year senior unsecured notes bearing interest at 6.25% and $1.2 billion of ten-year senior unsecured notes bearing interest at 7.375% for net proceeds of $1.97 billion. These notes are senior unsecured obligations and rank equally in right of payment with all our existing and future unsecured senior indebtedness. The proceeds from such offering were used to repay outstanding corporate indebtedness as follows: (i) $37 million of our 11% senior subordinated notes with a face value of $33 million for $37 million in cash; (ii) $338 million of our zero coupon convertible debentures for $339 million in cash; (iii) $737 million of our 73/4% notes with a face value of $737 million for $771 million in cash and (iv) $600 million of borrowings under our revolving credit facility. Accordingly, we expect to record an after-tax loss of approximately $17 million during first quarter 2003, which will reduce our income from continuing operations.

The following table reflects our corporate indebtedness as of December 31, 2002 after giving effect to only these issuances and the use of proceeds therefrom.

 
 Earliest
Mandatory
Redemption
Date

 As of
December 31,
2002

 Issuances/
(Repayments)

 Pro
Forma

Cash and cash equivalents   $126 $224 $350
    
 
 
Term notes           
 73/4% notes December 2003 $966 $(737)$229
 67/8% notes August 2006  850     850
 11% senior subordinated notes May 2009  530  (37) 493
 61/4% notes January 2008     800  800
 73/8% notes January 2013     1,200  1,200
Contingently convertible debt securities           
 Zero coupon convertible debentures May 2003  857  (338) 519
 Zero coupon senior convertible contingent notes February 2004  420     420
 37/8% convertible senior debentures November 2004  1,200     1,200
Other           
 Revolver borrowings    600  (600) 
 Net hedging gains    89     89
 Other    89     89
    
    
Total long-term debt, excluding Upper DECS    5,601     5,889
Upper DECS    863     863
    
    
Total corporate debt, including Upper DECS   $6,464    $6,752
    
    

63


Contingently Convertible Debt Securities

Our contingently convertible debt securities, which were all issued during 2001, comprised the following:


Earliest
Mandatory
Redemption
Date

Final
Maturity
Date

CD Common
Stock
Conversion
Rate Per
$1,000 Face

Principal
Amount at
December 31,
2002

Shares
Potentially
Issuable
as of
December 31,
2002

Pro Forma
Principal
Amount

Shares
Potentially
Issuable
on a Pro
Forma
Basis

Zero coupon convertible debenturesMay 2003May 202139.08$857 million33.5 million$519 million20.3 million
Zero coupon senior convertible contingent notes(a)Feb. 2004Feb. 202133.40$658 million22.0 million$658 million22.0 million
37/8% convertible senior debenturesNov. 2004Nov. 201141.58$1,200 million49.9 million$1,200 million49.9 million

(a)
Issued at a discount representing a yield-to-maturity of 2.5%.

As depicted above, these debt securities may be convertible into shares of our CD common stock upon the satisfaction of certain contingencies. If these securities do indeed become convertible, it could have a material impact to our total number of shares outstanding and to the number of shares utilized in performing our earnings per share calculations. As also depicted above, these debt securities include provisions that permit investors to require us to redeem the securities at their accreted value at specified times. If our stock price fails to adequately appreciate from the date of issuance of these securities until their redemption date, we believe it is likely that investors would exercise their option to require us to redeem the securities absent any modification to the terms of the securities. A redemption could cause us to utilize a material amount of cash to redeem such securities at their accreted value; however, we would not expect it to have a material adverse effect on our results of operations. The cost of redeeming and/or refinancing such securities would depend on market conditions at the time and the type of securities, if any, issued for refinancing purposes. As a result, our management considers the potential redemption of these securities in establishing and utilizing our credit facilities, in targeting our cash position and in evaluating additional issuances of debt securities. We consider our access to capital adequate to meet our prospective obligations under the terms of these securities. If holders were to require us to redeem these securities, we would fund such redemptions with available cash, borrowings under available credit facilities and/or the issuance of debt or equity securities; we may also consider amending the terms of the securities to induce holders to retain, rather than redeem, these securities, although we currently have no intent to do so.

These securities also contain provisions that could require us to pay a higher interest rate on the securities if they remain outstanding after the date at which we begin to have the right to redeem them. Because we have the right to redeem the securities at their accreted value before any such provisions become effective, we do not believe these provisions would have an adverse impact on our results of operations compared to our results of operations using other financing sources available at that time.

Upper DECS

Because the Upper DECS obligate holders to purchase shares of our CD common stock at a price determined by the average closing price of CD common stock during a 20-trading-day period ending in August 2004, the Upper DECS are functionally equivalent to issuing shares of CD common stock subject to an issue-price collar, with a delay in issuance until 2004. The issuance of the CD common stock will have a material impact to the number of shares utilized in performing our earnings per share calculation in 2004. However, the Upper DECS could also materially impact our diluted earnings per share calculations prior to 2004 if the price of CD common stock exceeds $28.42 (the point at which we would be required to reflect the issuance of the CD common stock in the number of shares used to calculate diluted earnings per share). At the time of issuance of the Upper DECS, we believed that the impact of issuing the Upper DECS would be favorable compared to an equivalent immediate issuance of common stock. Upon

64



settlement of the forward purchase contracts, in August 2004, we expect to issue shares of CD common stock in the range of approximately 30.3 million to 40.1 million (depending upon the price of CD common stock) and to receive gross proceeds in cash of approximately $863 million. Upon maturity in August 2006 of the senior notes that are currently a component of the Upper DECS in August 2006 we would be required to repay $863 million.million in cash. The significant terms for the Upper DECS can be found in Note 15 to our Consolidated Financial Statements.

63


Debt Related toUnder Management and Mortgage Programs

In connection with FIN 46, our debt under management and mortgage programs now reflects the debt issued by Bishop's Gate, a bankruptcy remote special purpose entity ("SPE") that we utilize to warehouse mortgage loans we originate prior to selling them into the secondary market. Additionally, as a result of the adoption of FIN 46R, the debt of AESOP Funding II, LLC, a bankruptcy remote special purpose limited liability company that we utilize to finance the acquisition of vehicles, which was previously reflected within our debt under management and mortgage programs, is now presented separately on our Consolidated Balance Sheet as related party debt under management and mortgage programs. See Note 16 to our Consolidated Financial Statements for more information regarding Bishop's Gate and AESOP Funding.

Debt under management and mortgage programs also reflects the debt issued by the Sierra entities, which are bankruptcy remote SPEs that we utilize to securitize timeshare receivables generated from the sale of vacation ownership interests by our timeshare business, and Apple Ridge, a bankruptcy remote SPE that we utilize to securitize relocation receivables generated from advancing funds to clients of our relocation business. During 2003, the underlying structures of the Sierra entities and Apple Ridge were amended in a manner that resulted in these entities no longer meeting the criteria to qualify as off-balance sheet entities. Consequently, we now consolidate these entities and the debt issued is reflected within debt under management and mortgage programs as of December 31, 2003. The following table summarizes the components of our debt related tounder management and mortgage programs:programs (including related party debt due to AESOP Funding):



 As of December 31,
 
 As of December 31,
 


 2002
 2001
 Change
 
 2003
 2002
 Change
 
Asset-Backed Debt:Asset-Backed Debt:       Asset-Backed Debt:       
Vehicle rental program       
 AESOP Funding $5,644 $4,029 $1,615 
 Other 651 2,053 (1,402)
Vehicle management program 3,118 3,058 60 
Mortgage program       
 Bishop's Gate (a) 1,651  1,651 
 Other  871 (871)
Timeshare program       
Vehicle rental program(a) $6,082 $3,759 $2,323  Sierra (b) 774  774 
Vehicle management program(a) 3,058 2,933 125  Other 335 145 190 
Mortgage program 871 500 371 Relocation program       
Timeshare program 145 10 135  Apple Ridge (c) 400  400 
Relocation program 80  80  Other  80 (80)
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
 10,236 7,202 3,034   12,573 10,236 2,337 
 
 
 
   
 
 
 

Unsecured Debt:

Unsecured Debt:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
Unsecured Debt:       
Term notes 1,421 679 742 Term notes 1,916 1,421 495 
Commercial paper 866 917 (51)Commercial paper 164 866 (702)
Bank loans 107 906 (799)Bank loans  107 (107)
Other 117 140 (23)Other 132 117 15 
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
 2,511 2,642 (131)  2,212 2,511 (299)
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
Total debt related to management and mortgage programs $12,747 $9,844 $2,903 
Total debt under management and mortgage programsTotal debt under management and mortgage programs $14,785 $12,747 $2,038 
 
 
 
   
 
 
 

(a)
Approximately $3.5 billion and $2.1 billion of the term notes outstanding under the vehicle rental and vehicle management programs, respectively, asAs of December 31, 2002, were rated AAA and Aaa by Standard & Poor's and Moody's Investor Services, respectively.

Our debt related to management and mortgage programs increased approximately $2.9 billion due to (i) the net issuance of approximately $2.3Bishop's Gate had $2.5 billion of variable funding notes under our vehicle rental program (approximately $2.0 billiondebt outstanding.

(b)
As of which was related to debt issued in connection withDecember 31, 2002, the refinancing of Budget debt assumed in the acquisition), (ii) the net issuance of $125Sierra entities had $550 million of term notes under our vehicle management programs, (iii) a net increasedebt outstanding.
(c)
As of $371 million primarily related to additional borrowings under our mortgage warehouse facilities within our mortgage program, (iv) $135December 31, 2002, Apple Ridge had $490 million of new borrowings under our timeshare program, (v) $80 million of borrowings under our new relocation program and (vi) the net issuance of $742 million of unsecured term notes by and for the exclusive use of our PHH subsidiary. Such amounts were partially offset by (i) the repayment during 2002 of $750 million of outstanding borrowings under our revolving credit facilities and (ii) other net repayments of $123 million. debt outstanding.

64


The significant terms for our outstanding debt instruments relating tounder management and mortgage programs at December 31, 20022003 can be found in Note 1916 to our Consolidated Financial Statements.

65


The following tables provide, for debt under management and mortgage programs, the contractual final maturities and our estimates of amortization of the corresponding assets under management and mortgage programs as service for such debt can generally be provided from the liquidation of such assets:

 
 Contractual Final Maturity
 Estimates of Amortization
Year(a)

 Unsecured
 Asset-Backed
 Total
 Unsecured
 Asset-Backed
 Total
2003 $851 $1,695 $2,546 $851 $2,573 $3,424
2004  119  2,684  2,803  119  3,432  3,551
2005  949  1,647  2,596  949  2,082  3,031
2006    845  845    372  372
2007  189  1,311  1,500  189  1,181  1,370
Thereafter  403  2,054  2,457  403  596  999
  
 
 
 
 
 
  $2,511 $10,236 $12,747 $2,511 $10,236 $12,747
  
 
 
 
 
 

(a)
Unsecured commercial paper borrowings of $750 million and $116 million are assumed to be repaid with borrowings under PHH's committed credit facilities expiring in 2005 and 2004, respectively, as such amounts are fully supported by PHH's committed credit facilities, which are described below.

Subsequent to December 31, 2002, our PHH subsidiary issued $1.0 billion of unsecured term notes for net proceeds of $988 million, of which $600 million will mature in March 2013 and bear interest at 7.125% and $400 million will mature in March 2008 and bear interest at 6%. We used the proceeds from these notes to repay outstanding commercial paper.

Mandatorily Redeemable Interest

Included within our total indebtedness in addition to corporate indebtedness and debt related to our management and mortgage program is a $375 million mandatorily redeemable senior preferred interest, which is mandatorily redeemable by the holder in 2015 and may not be redeemed by us prior to March 2005, except upon the occurrence of specified circumstances. We are required to pay distributions on the senior preferred interest based on three-month LIBOR plus a margin of 1.77%. In the event of default, or other specified events, including a downgrade in our credit ratings below investment grade, holders of the senior preferred interest have certain remedies and liquidation preferences, including the right to demand payment by us.

Stockholder Litigation Settlement Liability

On March 18, 2002, the Supreme Court denied all final petitions by plaintiffs relating to our principal securities class action lawsuit. As of December 31, 2001, we had deposited cash totaling $1.41 billion to a trust established for the benefit of the plaintiffs in this lawsuit. In March 2002, we made an additional payment of $250 million to the trust. We completely funded all remaining obligations arising out of the principal securities class action lawsuit on May 24, 2002 with a final payment of approximately $1.2 billion to the trust. We have no remaining obligations relating to the principal securities class action lawsuit.

AVAILABLE CREDIT AND ASSET-BACKED FUNDING ARRANGEMENTS AND COMMITTED CREDIT FACILITIES

At December 31, 2002,2003, we had approximately $3.7$7.6 billion of available funding arrangements and committed credit facilities (including availability(comprised of approximately $1.3$1.7 billion of availability at the corporate level and approximately $2.4$5.9 billion available for use in our management and mortgage programs).

As of December 31, 2002,2003, the committed credit facilities at the corporate level consisted of:

 
 Total
Capacity

 Outstanding
Borrowings

 Letters of
Credit Issued

 Available
Capacity

Maturing in December 2005 $2,900 $600 $1,010 $1,290
 
 Total Capacity
 Borrowings
Outstanding

 Letters of Credit Issued
 Available Capacity
Maturing in December 2005 $2,900 $ $1,169 $1,731

66


Borrowings under this facility bear interest at LIBOR plus a margin of 107.5 basis points. In addition, we are required to pay a per annum facility fee of 17.5 basis points under this facility. In the event that the credit ratings assigned to us by nationally recognized debt rating agencies are downgraded to a level below our ratings as of December 31, 2002 but still investment grade, the interest rate and facility fees on this facility are subject to incremental upward adjustments of 10 and 2.5 basis points, respectively. In the event that such credit ratings are downgraded below investment grade, the interest rate and facility fees are subject to further upward adjustments of 47.5 and 15 basis points, respectively. In addition to the $1,010 million of letters of credit issued as of December 31, 2002, this facility also contains the committed capacity to issue an additional $240 million in letters of credit. The letters of credit outstanding under this facility at December 31, 2002 were issued primarily as credit enhancements to provide additional collateralization for our Avis and Budget vehicle financing arrangements.

As of December 31, 2002, availableAvailable funding under our asset-backed debt programs and committed credit facilities related to our management and mortgage programs as of December 31, 2003 consisted of:of (including related party debt due to AESOP Funding):

 
 Total
Capacity

 Outstanding
Borrowings

 Available
Capacity

Asset-Backed Funding Arrangements(a)         
 Vehicle rental program $6,470 $6,082 $388
 Vehicle management program  3,491  3,058  433
 Mortgage program  900  871  29
 Timeshare program  153  145  8
 Relocation program  100  80  20
  
 
 
   11,114  10,236  878
  
 
 
Committed Credit Facilities(b)         
 Maturing in February 2004  750    750
 Maturing in February 2005  750    750
  
 
 
   1,500    1,500
  
 
 
  $12,614 $10,236 $2,378
  
 
 
 
 Total Capacity
 Outstanding Borrowings
 Available Capacity
Asset-Backed Funding Arrangements (a)         
 Vehicle rental program         
  AESOP Funding II, LLC $6,514 $5,644 $870
  Other  911  651  260
 Vehicle management program  3,917  3,118  799
 Mortgage program         
  Bishop's Gate  3,151  1,651  1,500
  Other  500    500
 Timeshare program         
  Sierra  1,242  774  468
  Other  425  335  90
 Relocation program         
  Apple Ridge  500  400  100
  Other  100    100
  
 
 
   17,260  12,573  4,687
  
 
 
Committed Credit Facilities (b)         
 Maturing in February 2005  1,250    1,250
  
 
 
  $18,510 $12,573 $5,937
  
 
 

(a)
Capacity is subject to maintaining sufficient assets to collateralize debt.
(b)
These committed credit facilities were entered into by and are for the exclusive use of our PHH subsidiary.

Any borrowings under our two $750 millionThe significant terms of these committed credit facilities maturingand available funding arrangements can be found in February 2004Notes 15 and 2005 will bear interest at LIBOR plus a margin currently approximating 72.5 basis points. In addition, we will also be required to pay a per annum facility fee of approximately 15 basis points under these facilities and a per annum utilization fee of approximately 25 basis points if usage under the facilities exceeds 25% of aggregate commitments. In the event that the credit ratings assigned16 to our PHH subsidiary by nationally recognized debt rating agencies are downgraded to a level below PHH's ratings as of December 31, 2002, the interest rate and facility fees on these facilities are subject to incremental upward adjustments of approximately 22.5 basis points. In the event that the credit ratings are downgraded below investment grade, the interest rate and facility fees are subject to further upward adjustments of approximately 65 basis points.Consolidated Financial Statements.

We also currently have $1 billionhad $400 million of availability for public debt or equity issuances under a shelf registration statement at the corporate level and $1 billionour PHH subsidiary had an additional $874 million of availability for public debt issuances under a shelf registration statements at the PHH level.statement.

OFF-BALANCE SHEET FINANCING ARRANGEMENTS

In addition to our on-balance sheet borrowings and available credit facilities as part of our overall financing and liquidity strategy, we sell specific assets under management and mortgage programs

6765



generated or acquired in the normal course of business. At the corporate level, we sell timeshare receivables to bankruptcy remote qualifying special purpose entities under revolving sales agreements in exchange for cash. Our PHH subsidiary also sells relocation receivables to Apple Ridge Funding LLC, a bankruptcy remote qualifying special purpose entity, in exchange for cash. Additionally, our PHH subsidiary sells mortgage loans originated by our mortgage business into the secondary market, which is customary practice in the mortgage industry. Such mortgage loans are sold into the secondary market primarily through one of the following means: (i) the direct sale to a government-sponsored entity, (ii) through capacity under a subsidiary's public registration statement (which approximated $1.1 billion as of December 31, 2002) or (iii) through Bishop's Gate Residential Mortgage Trust, an unaffiliated bankruptcy remote special purpose entity.

We utilize the above-mentioned special purpose entities because they are highly efficient for the sale or financing of assets and represent conventional practice in the finance industry. See Note 1 to our Consolidated Financial Statements for our accounting policy regarding the sale of assets to off-balance sheet entities. None of our affiliates, officers, directors or employees hold any equity interest in any of these special purpose entities, nor do we or our affiliates provide any financial support or financial guarantee arrangements to these special purpose entities. None of our affiliates, officers, directors or employees receive any remuneration from any of these special purpose entities.

Presented below is detailed information for each of the special purpose entities we utilized in off-balance sheet financing and sale arrangements as of December 31, 2002:

 
 Assets
Serviced(a)

 Maximum
Funding
Capacity

 Debt
Issued

 Maximum
Available
Capacity(b)

 Annual
Servicing
Fee(c)

Timeshare              
 Sierra(d) $645 $550 $550 $ 1.00%
 Others  546  488  488   .75%-1.75%
Relocation              
 Apple Ridge  567  600  490  110 .75%
Mortgage              
 Bishop's Gate(e)  2,302  3,223(f)  2,351  724 .37%

(a)
Does not include cash of $25 million, $24 million, $11 million and $195 million at Sierra, other timeshare special purpose entities, Apple Ridge and Bishop's Gate, respectively.
(b)
Subject to maintaining sufficient assets to collateralize debt.
(c)
Represents annual servicing fees we receive on the outstanding balance of the transferred assets.
(d)
Sierra Receivables Funding Company LLC is a bankruptcy remote qualifying special purpose entity that we formed during 2002 in connection with the establishment of a securitization facility that replaced certain other timeshare receivable securitization facilities utilized by our Fairfield and Trendwest subsidiaries.
(e)
The equity of Bishop's Gate (currently in excess of 4%) is held by independent third parties who bear the credit risk of the assets. Bishop's Gate has entered into swaps with several banks, the net effect of which is that the banks have agreed to bear certain interest rate risks, non-credit related market risks and prepayment risks related to the mortgage loans held by Bishop's Gate. Additionally, PHH has entered into separate corresponding swaps with the banks, the net effect of which is that PHH has agreed to bear the interest rate risks, non-credit related market risks and prepayment risks related to the mortgage loans held by Bishop's Gate assumed by the banks under their swap with Bishop's Gate. We in turn offset the interest rate risks associated with the swaps by entering into forward delivery contracts for mortgage-backed securities. Both the swaps and the forward delivery commitments are derivatives under SFAS No. 133 and are recorded at fair value through earnings at the end of each reporting period. The fair value and changes in fair value of the swaps and forward delivery commitments have substantially offsetting effects. In connection with the adoption of FASB Interpretation No. 46, "Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities" (discussed below in "Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements"), we expect to consolidate Bishop's Gate in our financial statements as of July 1, 2003.
(f)
Includes our ability to fund assets with $148 million of outside equity certificates.

The receivables and mortgage loans transferred to these special purpose entities, as well as the mortgage loans sold to the secondary market through other means, are generally non-recourse to us and to PHH.

68



PHH also sells interests in operating leases and the underlying vehicles to two independent Canadian third parties. PHH repurchases the leased vehicles and then leases such vehicles under direct financing leases to the Canadian third parties. The Canadian third parties retain the lease rights and prepay all the lease payments except for an agreed upon amount, which is typically 8% of the total lease payments. The amounts not prepaid represent our only exposure in connection with these transactions. The total subordinated interest under these leasing arrangements, as recorded on our Consolidated Balance Sheets at December 31, 2002 and 2001, were $22 million and $21 million, respectively. We recognized $6 million and $7 million of net revenues related to these securitizations during 2002 and 2001, respectively.

Liquidity RiskLIQUIDITY RISK

Our liquidity position may be negatively affected by unfavorable conditions in any one of the industries in which we operate, as we may not have the ability to generate sufficient cash flows from operating activities due to those unfavorable conditions.operate. Additionally, our liquidity as it relates to both management and mortgage programs could be adversely affected by a(i) the deterioration in the performance of the underlying assets of such programs. Accessprograms, (ii) the impairment of our ability to access the principal financing program for our vehicle rental subsidiaries may also be impaired shouldif General Motors Corporation or Ford Motor Company should not be able to honor its obligations to repurchase a substantial number of our vehicles. Our liquidity as it relatesvehicles and (iii) our inability to mortgage programs is highly dependent onaccess the secondary marketsmarket for mortgage loans. Access toloans or certain of our securitization facilities and our abilityinability to act as servicer thereto, also may be limitedwhich could occur in the event that our or PHH's credit ratings are downgraded below investment grade and, in certain circumstances, where we or PHH fail to meet certain financial ratios. However,Further, access to our credit facilities may be limited if we were to fail to meet certain financial ratios. We do not believe that our or PHH's credit ratings are likely to fall below such thresholds.investment grade. Additionally, we monitor the maintenance of theserequired financial ratios and, as of December 31, 2002,2003, we were in compliance with all financial covenants under theseour credit and securitization facilities. When securitizing assets under management and mortgage programs, we make representations and warranties customary to the securitization markets, including eligibility characteristics of the assets transferred and servicing responsibilities.

Currently, our credit ratings are as follows:

 
 Moody's
Investors
Investor Service

 Standard &
Poor's

 Fitch
Ratings

Cendant      
Senior unsecured debt Baa1 BBB BBB+
Subordinated debtBaa2BBB-  BBB  

PHH

 

 

 

 

 

 
Senior debt Baa1 BBB+ BBB+
Short-term debt P-2 A-2 F-2

All of the above credit ratings, with the exception of those assigned to PHH's short-term debt, are currently on negative outlook. A security rating is not a recommendation to buy, sell or hold securities and is subject to revision or withdrawal by the assigning rating organization. Each rating should be evaluated independently of any other rating.

6966



Contractual ObligationsCONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS

The following table summarizes our future contractual obligations:

 
 2003
 2004
 2005
 2006
 2007
 Thereafter
 Total
Long-term debt(a) $30 $1,622 $31 $920 $8 $3,278 $5,889
Upper DECS(b)        863      863
Debt under management and mortgage programs(c)  1,896  2,687  2,374  845  1,500  3,457  12,759
Mandatorily redeemable interest            375  375
Operating leases  442  342  264  201  138  620  2,007
Capital leases  17  8  2  1      28
Commitments to purchase vehicles(d)  2,567            2,567
Other purchase commitments(e)[di y^^_htm][nc_ul][dd]  624  606  275  284  249  598  2,636
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
Total $5,576 $5,265 $2,946 $3,114 $1,895 $8,328 $27,124
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 2004
 2005
 2006
 2007
 2008
 Thereafter
 Total
Long-term debt (a) $1,629 $22 $913 $2 $805 $1,768 $5,139
Upper DECS (b)      863        863
Debt under management and mortgage programs (c)                     
 Asset-backed  2,532  3,479  3,047  1,262  1,748  505  12,573
 Unsecured  114  405    190  432  1,071  2,212
Operating leases  547  435  353  288  193  877  2,693
Capital leases  20  13  6  1      40
Commitments to purchase vehicles (d)  4,916            4,916
Other purchase commitments (e)  731  319  282  236  179  412  2,159
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
Total $10,489 $4,673 $5,464 $1,979 $3,357 $4,633 $30,595
  
 
 
 
 
 
 

(a)
Represents long-term debt (which includes current portion) and reflects (i) January 2003 issuance of $800 million due 2008 and $1.2 billion due 2013 and (ii) the 2003 repurchases of $1,075 million due 2003, $600 million due 2005 and $37 million due 2009..
(b)
Assumes that the senior note component of the Upper DECS are successfully remarketed in 2004. If such remarketing is not successful, the senior notes would be retired (without any payment of cash by us) in August 2004 in satisfaction of the related forward purchase contract,contracts, whereby holders of the Upper DECS are required to purchase shares of our CD common stock.
(c)
Represents debt under management and mortgage programs (including related party debt due to AESOP Funding), which was issued to support the purchase of assets under management and mortgage programs. Amounts shown are based uponThese amounts represent the contractual maturities for such debt, except for notes issued under our vehicle management and reflect (i)Sierra timeshare programs, where the February 2003 issuanceunderlying indentures require payments based on cash inflows relating to the corresponding assets under management and mortgage programs and for which estimates of $650 million ofrepayments have been used. Unsecured commercial paper and redemptionborrowings of $650$164 million of medium-term notes due 2003, (ii) theare assumed to be repaid with borrowings under our PHH subsidiary's committed credit facilities, which expire in February 2003 issuance of $400 million of medium-term notes due 2008 and $600 million of medium-term notes due 2013 and (iii) the February 2003 repayment of $988 million of commercial paper due 2003.2005, as such amount is fully supported by these committed credit facilities.
(d)
Represents commitments to purchase vehicles from either General Motors Corporation or Ford Motor Company. The purchase of such vehicles are financed through the issuance of debt under management and mortgage programs in addition to cash received upon the sale of vehicles primarily under repurchase programs (see Note 19—16—Debt Under Management and Mortgage Programs and Borrowing Arrangements to our Consolidated Financial Statements).
(e)
Primarily represents commitments under service contracts for information technology and telecommunications.

AFFILIATED ENTITIESACCOUNTING POLICIES

Critical Accounting Policies
In presenting our financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles, we are required to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported therein. Several of the estimates and assumptions we are required to make relate to matters that are inherently uncertain as they pertain to future events. However, events that are outside of our control cannot be predicted and, as such, they cannot be contemplated in evaluating such estimates and assumptions. If there is a significant unfavorable change to current conditions, it could result in a material adverse impact to our consolidated results of operations, financial position and liquidity. We maintain investmentsbelieve that the estimates and assumptions we used when preparing our financial statements were the most appropriate at that time. Presented below are those accounting policies that we believe require subjective and complex judgments that could potentially affect reported results. However, the majority of our businesses operate in affiliated entities principallyenvironments where we are paid a fee for a service performed, and therefore the results of the majority of our recurring operations are recorded in our financial statements using accounting policies that are not particularly subjective, nor complex.

Mortgage Servicing Rights.    A mortgage servicing right is the right to supportreceive a portion of the interest coupon and fees collected from the mortgagor for performing specified mortgage servicing activities. The value of mortgage servicing rights is estimated based upon an internal valuation that reflects management's

67



estimates of expected future cash flows considering prepayment estimates (developed using a third party model described below), our businesshistorical prepayment rates, portfolio characteristics, interest rates based on interest rate yield curves and other economic factors. More specifically, we incorporate a probability weighted Option Adjusted Spread ("OAS") model of growing earningsto generate and discount cash flows for the MSR valuation. The OAS model generates numerous interest rate paths then calculates the MSR cash flow at each monthly point for each interest rate path and discounts those cash flows back to the current period. The MSR value is determined by averaging the discounted cash flows from each of the interest rate paths. The interest rate paths are generated with minimal asset risk. Certaina random distribution centered around implied forward interest rates, which are determined from the interest rate yield curve at any given point of time. As of December 31, 2003, the implied forward interest rates project an increase of approximately 48 basis points in the yield of the 10-year Treasury Note over the next 12 months. Changes in the yield curve will result in changes to the forward rates implied from that yield curve.

As noted above, a key assumption in our estimate of the MSR valuation are forecasted prepayments. We use a third party model, adjusted to reflect the historical prepayment behavior exhibited by our portfolio, to forecast prepayment rates at each monthly point for each interest rate path in the OAS model. The prepayment forecast is based on historical observations of prepayment behavior in similar circumstances. The prepayment forecast incorporates loan characteristics (e.g., loan type and note rate) and factors such as recent prepayment experience, previous refinance opportunities and estimated levels of home equity to determine the prepayment forecast at each monthly point for each interest rate path.

To the extent that fair value is less than carrying value at the individual strata level, we would consider the portfolio to have been impaired and record a related charge. Reductions in interest rates different than those used in our models could cause us to use different assumptions in the MSR valuation, which could result in a decrease in the estimated fair value of our officersMSR asset, requiring a corresponding reduction in the carrying value of the asset. To mitigate this risk, we use derivatives that generally increase in value as interest rates decline and conversely decline in value as interest rates increase. Additionally, as interest rates decrease, we have historically experienced increased production revenue resulting from a greater level of refinancings, which over time has historically mitigated the impact on earnings of the decline in our MSR asset.

Changes in the estimated fair value of the mortgage servicing rights based upon variations in the assumptions (e.g., future interest rate levels, prepayment speeds) cannot be extrapolated because the relationship of the change in assumptions to the change in fair value may servenot be linear. Changes in one assumption may result in changes to another, which may magnify or counteract the fair value sensitivity analysis and would make such an analysis not meaningful. Additionally, further declines in interest rates due to a weakening economy and geopolitical risks, which result in an increase in refinancing activity or changes in assumptions, could adversely impact the valuation. During 2003, the interest rate environment caused loans with coupon rates at or below 6% to become a significant component of the Company's overall loan servicing portfolio. Therefore, we adjusted the strata of the portfolio during third quarter 2003, which did not have an impact on the BoardMSR valuation. The carrying value of Directorsour MSR asset was approximately $1.6 billion as of December 31, 2003 and the total portfolio that we were servicing approximated $136.4 billion as of December 31, 2003 (refer to Note 6 to our Consolidated Financial Statements for a detailed discussion of the effect of any changes to the value of this asset during 2003 and 2002). The effects of any adverse potential changes in the estimated fair value of our MSR asset are detailed in Note 17 to our Consolidated Financial Statements.

Financial Instruments.    We estimate fair values for each of our financial instruments, including derivative instruments. Most of these entities, but in no instances do they constitute a majorityfinancial instruments are not publicly traded on an organized exchange. In the absence of quoted market prices, we must develop an estimate of fair value using dealer quotes, present value cash flow models, option pricing models or other conventional valuation methods, as appropriate. The use of these fair value techniques involves significant judgments and assumptions, including estimates

68



of future interest rate levels based on interest rate yield curves, prepayment and volatility factors, and an estimation of the Board, nor do they receive any economic benefits. Our consolidation policy as it relates to these affiliated entities can be foundtiming of future cash flows. The use of different assumptions may have a material effect on the estimated fair value amounts recorded in the financial statements, which are disclosed in Note 125 to our Consolidated Financial Statements. Furthermore,In addition, hedge accounting requires that at the effects on ourbeginning of each hedge period, we justify an expectation that the relationship between the changes in fair value of derivatives designated as hedges compared to changes in the fair value of the underlying hedged items be highly effective. This effectiveness assessment involves an estimation of changes in fair value resulting from changes in interest rates and corresponding changes in prepayment levels, as well as the probability of the occurrence of transactions for cash flow hedges. The use of different assumptions and changing market conditions may impact the results of operations,the effectiveness assessment and ultimately the timing of when changes in derivative fair values and the underlying hedged items are recorded in earnings. See Item 7a. "Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk" for a discussion of the effect of hypothetical changes to these assumptions.

Goodwill.    We have reviewed the carrying value of our goodwill as required by Statement of Financial Accounting Standards ("SFAS") No. 142, "Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets," by comparing the carrying value of our reporting units to their fair value and determined that the carrying amount of our reporting units did not exceed their respective fair value. When determining fair value, we utilized various assumptions, including projections of future cash flows. A change in these underlying assumptions will cause a change in the results of the tests and, as such, could cause fair value to be less than the respective carrying amount. In such event, we would then be required to record a charge, which would impact earnings. We will continue to review the carrying value of goodwill for impairment annually, or more frequently if circumstances indicate impairment may have occurred.

We provide a wide range of consumer and business services and, as a result, our goodwill is allocated among many diverse reporting units. Accordingly, it is difficult to quantify the impact of an adverse change in financial results and related cash flows, as such change may be isolated to a small number of our reporting units or spread across our entire organization. In either case, the magnitude of an impairment to goodwill, if any, cannot be extrapolated. However, our businesses are concentrated in a few industries and, financial position from maintainingas such, an adverse change to any of these relationships are presentedindustries will impact our consolidated results and may result in theimpairment of our goodwill. The aggregate in the tables provided incarrying value of our goodwill was approximately $11.1 billion at December 31, 2003. Refer to Note 28—Related Party Transactions5 to our Consolidated Financial Statements. Provided below areStatements for more information on goodwill.

Changes in Accounting Policies During 2003
On January 1, 2003, we adopted the fair value method of accounting for stock-based compensation provisions of SFAS No. 123, "Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation" and all the provisions of SFAS No. 148, "Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation—Transition and Disclosure." As a result, we changed our accounting policy for stock-based compensation using the prospective transition method.

In addition, on January 1, 2003, we adopted the following standards as a result of the issuance of new accounting pronouncements by the FASB in 2002:


On January 17, 2003, the FASB issued FIN 46 and on December 24, 2003, the FASB issued a complete replacement of FIN 46, entitled FIN 46 Revised ("FIN 46R"), which clarifies certain complexities of FIN 46. As of September 30, 2003, we had applied the provisions of FIN 46 for all transactions initiated

69


subsequent to January 31, 2003 and also to Bishop's Gate and Trilegiant. We adopted FIN 46R in its entirety as of December 31, 2003 (even though adoption for non-SPEs was not required until March 31, 2004).

During 2003, the FASB also issued the following literature, which we have adopted as of July 1, 2003:

For more detailed descriptionsinformation regarding any of these pronouncements and the impact thereof on our relationship with each of our affiliated entities, which is also presented in substantially the same manner inbusiness, see Note 282 to our Consolidated Financial Statements.

Trip Network, Inc.Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements

During March 2001, we funded2003, the creation of Trip Network withSEC provided interim guidance in a contribution of assets valued at approximately $20 million in exchange for all of the common and preferred stock of Trip Network. We unilaterally transferred all the common shares of Trip Networkspeech pertaining to the Hospitality Technology Trust ("HTT")measurement of interest rate lock commitments related to loans that will be held for resale (commonly referred to as commitments to fund mortgages). See Note 2—Summary of Significant Accounting Policies for more information.

ITEM 7A.    QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

We use various financial instruments, particularly swap contracts, forward delivery commitments and retainedfutures and options contracts to manage and reduce the preferred stock of Trip Networkinterest rate risk related specifically to our committed mortgage pipeline, mortgage loan inventory, mortgage servicing rights, mortgage-backed securities, debt and warrantscertain other interest bearing liabilities. Foreign currency forwards are also used to purchase up to 28,250 shares of Trip Network's common stock. Trip Network provides travel services to both our franchisees as well as non-franchiseesmanage and as such, our initial contribution ofreduce the Trip Network common stock to HTT supported our lodging franchise business model whereby we endeavored to avoid direct competitionforeign currency exchange rate risk associated with our franchisees for the saleforeign currency denominated receivables and forecasted royalties, forecasted earnings of transient hotel rooms. HTT isforeign subsidiaries and forecasted foreign currency denominated acquisitions.

We are exclusively an independent technology trust that is controlled by three independent trustees whoend user of these instruments, which are commonly referred to as derivatives. We do not officers, directorsengage in trading, market-making or employees of Cendant or relatives of

70



officers, directors or employees of Cendant. HTT was established in 1997 for purposes of enhancing and promoting the use of advanced technology for our lodging brands, its beneficiaries, including providing financial and technology support services and investing in Internet relatedother speculative activities for the benefit of its beneficiaries. The hotel franchise chains have agreed to link their brand and property Web sites to Trip.com because of, for among other reasons, their beneficial interest in HTT. A hotel franchise chain is not required to make any contributions to Trip Network in order for the franchisee's brand and property to be included on Trip Network's Web site. Trip Network earns a commission on all hotel rooms sold on its Web site, including those sold by our hotel franchise chains, at market rates ranging from 8 to 10%. Management believes that the enhanced functionality for the brand and property Web pages to be provided by Trip.com links will help build customer loyalty and avoid the problem of viewers leaving the brand and property Web sites for the sites of competitors. Additionally, management believes that the aggregate links of all franchisee properties create critical mass and Web-traffic for Trip Network further enhancing its ability to be successful. If Trip Network is successful, then management believes the common shares will likely appreciate in value. The liquidation of shares (representing HTT's equity stake, which approximates 20% of Trip Network's common stock on a fully diluted basis) will provide HTT with further resources to pursue its stated objectives.

In 2001, we contributed $85 million, including $45 million in cash and 1.5 million shares of Homestore common stock then-valued at $34 million, to Trip Network for the purpose of pursuing the development of an online travel business for the benefit of certain of our current and future franchisees. This arrangement is consistent with our strategy of creating a single platform to research and develop Internet related products within an integrated business plan. Since we did not have the in-house expertise to develop new technology for Internet Web sites, we outsourced the development of certain Internet assets and Web-site features to Trip Network through the existing arrangement. Since the advance is repayable to us only if the development results in the achievement of certainderivatives markets. More detailed information about these financial results, such amount was expensed by us during 2001 andinstruments is included as a component of restructuring and other unusual chargesprovided in our Consolidated Statement of Income. As of December 31, 2002, none of the financial results that would have caused the repayment of this advance had been achieved.

During October 2001, we entered into two separate lease and licensing agreements with Trip Network, whereby Trip Network was granted a license to operate the online businesses of Trip.com, Inc. and Cheap Tickets (both wholly-owned subsidiaries of Cendant) and a lease or sublease, as applicable, to all the assets of these companies necessary to operate such businesses. The Trip.com license agreement has a one-year term and is renewable at Trip Network's option for 40 additional one-year periods. The Cheaptickets.com license agreement has a 40-year term. Under these agreements, we receive a license fee of 3% of revenues generated by Trip.com and Cheaptickets.com during the term of the agreements. The royalty rate was negotiated with and approved by Trip Network's board of directors. We proposed our royalty rate based upon market rate analysis of similar licensing type agreements. In connection with this agreement, we also received warrants to purchase up to 46,000 shares of Trip Network common stock, which are exercisable, at our option, at a price of $0.01 per share, upon achievement of certain financial results beginning in October 2003 or upon a change of control of Trip Network. The warrants were also negotiated with and approved by Trip Network's board of directors. During 2002, we recognized $3 million of revenue in connection with this agreement. During 2001, the revenue recorded by us in connection with this agreement was not material.

Also during October 2001, we entered into a travel services agreement with Trip Network, whereby we provide Trip Network with call center services. In addition, we process and support Trip Network's booking and fulfillment of travel transactions and provide travel-related products and services to maintain and develop relationships, discounts and favorable commissions with travel vendors. For these services, we receive a fee of cost plus an applicable mark-up (6%), which was determined based upon an examination of profit margins in the travel agency industry. During 2002, we recognized $5 million of revenue in connection with this agreement. During 2001, the revenue recorded by us in connection with this agreement was not material.

71



Additionally, during October 2001, we entered into a 40-year global distribution services subscriber agreement with Trip Network, whereby we provide all global distribution services for Trip Network. Pursuant to such agreement, we, through our Galileo subsidiary, receive payments from airlines, car rental agencies and hoteliers each time Trip Network books a reservation using the Galileo global distribution system. As it is normal and customary for a global distribution system provider to pay incentive fees to a travel agency, we prepaid Trip Network $42 million as compensation for booking segments through Galileo. Accordingly, on the date of commitment, we recorded an asset of $42 million for prepaid incentive fees, which is being amortized over 40 years, and a related credit in accounts payable and other current liabilities as we did not disburse the cash until January 2002. Such amount was mutually agreed to and represented the projected discounted amount of incentive fees that we expected to pay Trip Network over the term of the 40-year licensing agreement. We benefited from such prepayment by receiving a discount on the lump sum payment of incentive fees upon consummation of the contract rather than paying a portion of the incentive fee in advance and a portion of the incentive fee as segments are booked. Amortization of the asset is calculated in direct proportion to the expected cash flow benefits. During 2002, amortization recorded by us relating to this prepaid asset was $1 million. The amortization we recorded during 2001 was not material. As of December 31, 2002 and 2001, the prepaid asset approximated $41 million and $42 million, respectively, and was included within other non-current assets on our Consolidated Balance Sheets.

Our preferred stock investment, which is convertible into approximately 80% of Trip Network's common stock on a fully diluted basis, is non-voting and accounted for using the cost method. The preferred stock investment is not convertible prior to March 31, 2003 except upon a change of control of Trip Network. As of December 31, 2002 and 2001, our preferred equity interest in Trip Network approximated $17 million. During the years ended December 31, 2002 and 2001, we did not record any dividend income relating to our preferred equity interest in Trip Network. The warrants are exercisable, at our option, upon the achievement of certain financial results beginning on March 31, 2003 or upon a change of control of Trip Network at an exercise price of $0.01 per share. As of December 31, 2002, none of the financial results which would cause the warrants to be exercisable had been achieved. We are not obligated or contingently liable for any debt incurred by Trip Network.

Management is currently engaged in discussions with the trustees of HTT to negotiate our acquisition of the common stock of Trip Network, which is expected to occur during second quarter 2003. The consolidation of Trip Network upon acquisition will not have a material impact on our consolidated results of operations or any trends related thereto.

FFD Development Company, LLC

Prior to our acquisition of Fairfield Resorts, Inc. in April 2001, Fairfield operated its own property acquisition, planning, design and construction functions. These functions were transferred by Fairfield to FFD Development Company LLC ("FFD") immediately prior to our acquisition of Fairfield, along with Fairfield employees who were responsible for these functions. Given the extensive knowledge of Fairfield's standards and specifications as it related to the procurement of property and the planning and construction of timeshares, we continued to rely on the relationship between Fairfield and FFD throughout 2002 and 2001. However, we continued to penetrate the timeshare industry in 2002 with our acquisitions of Trendwest and Equivest and, as a result, developed the ability to integrate FFD into the Cendant timeshare businesses in a manner that would be both effective and cost beneficial. Accordingly, on February 3, 2003, we acquired all of the common equity interests of FFD (see Note 31—Subsequent Events). Therefore, FFD will be included within our consolidated results of operations and financial position beginning on February 4, 2003. For a detailed discussion of our relationship with FFD and the impact thereof on our results of operations and financial position during 2002 and 2001, see Note 2825—Financial Instruments to our Consolidated Financial Statements.

72Our principal market exposures are interest and foreign currency rate risks.

We assess our market risk based on changes in interest and foreign currency exchange rates utilizing a sensitivity analysis. The sensitivity analysis measures the potential impact in earnings, fair values and cash flows based on a hypothetical 10% change (increase and decrease) in interest and currency rates.

We use a discounted cash flow model in determining the fair values of relocation receivables, timeshare receivables, equity advances on homes, mortgage servicing rights and our retained interests in securitized assets. The fair value of mortgage loans, commitments to fund mortgages and mortgage-backed securities

70



are determined from market sources. The primary assumptions used in determining fair value are prepayment speeds, estimated loss rates and discount rates. In determining the fair value of mortgage servicing rights, the model also utilizes credit losses and mortgage servicing revenues and expenses as primary assumptions. In addition, for commitments to fund mortgages, the borrower's propensity to close their mortgage loan under the commitment is used as a primary assumption. For mortgage loans, commitments to fund mortgages, forward delivery contracts and options, we rely on market sources in determining the impact of interest rate shifts. We also utilize a probability weighted option-adjusted spread ("OAS") model to determine the impact of interest rate shifts on mortgage servicing rights and mortgage-backed securities. The primary assumption in an OAS model is the implied market volatility of interest rates and prepayment speeds and the same primary assumptions are used in determining fair value.

We use a duration-based model in determining the impact of interest rate shifts on our debt portfolio, certain other interest bearing liabilities and interest rate derivatives portfolios. The primary assumption used in these models is that a 10% increase or decrease in the benchmark interest rate produces a parallel shift in the yield curve across all maturities.

We use a current market pricing model to assess the changes in the value of the U.S. dollar on foreign currency denominated monetary assets and liabilities and derivatives. The primary assumption used in these models is a hypothetical 10% weakening or strengthening of the U.S. dollar against all our currency exposures at December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001.

Our total market risk is influenced by a wide variety of factors including the volatility present within the markets and the liquidity of the markets. There are certain limitations inherent in the sensitivity analyses presented. While probably the most meaningful analysis, these "shock tests" are constrained by several factors, including the necessity to conduct the analysis based on a single point in time and the inability to include the complex market reactions that normally would arise from the market shifts modeled.

We used December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001 market rates on our instruments to perform the sensitivity analyses separately for each of our market risk exposures—interest and currency rate instruments. The estimates are based on the market risk sensitive portfolios described in the preceding paragraphs and assume instantaneous, parallel shifts in interest rate yield curves and exchange rates.

We have determined that the impact of a 10% change in interest and foreign currency exchange rates and prices on our earnings, fair values and cash flows would not be material. While these results may be used as benchmarks, they should not be viewed as forecasts.

ITEM 8.    FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA

See Financial Statements and Financial Statement Index commencing on Page F-1 hereof.

ITEM 9.    CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE

None.

71


ITEM 9A.    CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

(a)Disclosure Controls and Procedures.    The Company's management, with the participation of the Company's Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, has evaluated the effectiveness of the Company's disclosure controls and procedures (as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act")) as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based on such evaluation, the Company's Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that, as of the end of such period, the Company's disclosure controls and procedures are effective.

(b)Internal Control Over Financial Reporting.    There have not been any changes in the Company's internal control over financial reporting (as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) during the Company's fiscal fourth quarter that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company's internal control over financial reporting.


Trilegiant CorporationPART III

On July 2, 2001,ITEM 10.    DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT

The information contained in the former managementCompany's Annual Proxy Statement under the sections titled "Board of our individual membership businesses (Cendant Membership ServicesDirectors," "Executive Officers" and Cendant Incentives subsidiaries) purchased 100%"Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance" are incorporated herein by reference in response to this item.

ITEM 11.    EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

The information contained in the Company's Annual Proxy Statement under the section titled "Executive Compensation and Other Information" is incorporated herein by reference in response to this item.

ITEM 12.    SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS

The information contained in the Company's Annual Proxy Statement under the section titled "Security Ownership of theCertain Beneficial Owners and Management" is incorporated herein by reference in response to this item.

72


Equity Compensation Plan Information

The following table provides information about shares of CD common stock ("Common Stock") that may be issued upon the exercise of a newly-created company, Trilegiant Corporation, for $2.7 million in cash. Trilegiant operates membership-based clubsoptions and programs and other incentive-based programs through an outsourcing arrangement with us whereby we outsourced our individual membership and loyalty businesses to Trilegiant. We entered into this outsourcing arrangement with Trilegiant on July 2, 2001 whereby we retained substantiallyrestricted stock units under all of the assets and liabilities of theCompany's existing membership business outsourced under the arrangement and licensed Trilegiant the right to market products utilizing our intellectual property to new members. Accordingly, we continue to collect membership fees from, and are obligated to provide membership benefits to, members of our individual membership business that existed as of July 2, 2001 (referred to as "existing members"), including their renewals and Trilegiant provides fulfillment services (including collecting cash, paying commissions, processing refunds, providing membership services and benefits and maintaining specified service level standards) for these members in exchange for a servicing fee pursuant to the Third Party Administrator agreement, which is cost plus 10%. Furthermore, Trilegiant collects the membership fees from, and is obligated to provide membership benefits to, any members who join the membership based clubs and programs and all other incentive programs subsequent to July 2, 2001 (referred to as "new members") and recognizes the related revenue and expenses. Similar to our other franchise businesses, we receive a royalty from Trilegiant on all future revenue (over the 40-year term of the license agreement) generated by the new members (initially 5% beginning in third quarter 2002 and increasing to approximately 16% over 10 years).

During 2002 and 2001, we expensed $179 million and $128 million, respectively, of servicing fees relating to this outsourcing arrangement, of which we paid Trilegiant $166 million and $106 million, respectively, and owed Trilegiant $13 million and $22 millionequity compensation plans as of December 31, 20022003. The table excludes 8.5 million shares of Common Stock approved by stockholders issued or available for issuance pursuant to the 1998 Employee Stock Purchase Plan.

 
 Number of securities to be
issued upon exercise of
outstanding options,
warrants, rights and
restricted stock units

 Weighted-average exercise
price of outstanding
options, warrants and
rights (excludes
restricted stock units)

 Number of securities
remaining available
for future issuance
under equity compensation
plans (excluding securities
reflected in first column)

Plan Category       
Equity compensation plans approved by Company stockholders(a) 68,369,430 $19.37 68,534,011
Equity compensation plans not approved by Company stockholders(b) (d) 91,013,836  16.33 79,999,450
Equity compensation plans assumed in mergers, acquisitions and corporate transactions(c) 2,791,213  12.98 13,057,953
Total 162,174,479  17.53 161,591,414

       

73


74


ITEM 13.    CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS

The information contained in the Company's Annual Proxy Statement under the section titled "Certain Relationships and Related Transactions" is incorporated herein by reference in response to this item.

ITEM 14.    PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES

The information contained in the Company's Annual Proxy Statement under the section titled "Ratification of Appointment of Auditors" is incorporated herein by reference in response to this item.


PART IV

ITEM 15.    EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K

ITEM 15(A)(1)    FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

See Financial Statements and Financial Statements Index commencing on page F-1 hereof.

ITEM 15(A)(3)    EXHIBITS

See Exhibit Index commencing on page G-1 hereof.

ITEM 15(B)    REPORTS ON FORM 8-K

On October 20, 2003, we filed a current report on Form 8-K to report under Item 5 our behalf. During 2002,third quarter 2003 results.

On December 16, 2003, we recorded $7 millionfiled a current report on Form 8-K to report under Item 5 that George Herrera, former CEO and President, United States Hispanic Chamber of royalty revenue relatedCommerce, would be joining our Board of Directors on January 26, 2004 as an independent Director replacing The Honorable William S. Cohen, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of The Cohen Group.

75



SIGNATURES

Pursuant to Trilegiant's members,the requirements of which we collected $3 million from Trilegiant duringSection 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.




CENDANT CORPORATION



By:

/s/  
JAMES E. BUCKMAN      
James E. Buckman
Vice Chairman and General Counsel
Date: March 1, 2004

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

Signature
Title
Date





/s/  HENRY R. SILVERMAN      
(Henry R. Silverman)
Chairman of the Board, President, Chief Executive Officer and DirectorMarch 1, 2004

/s/  
JAMES E. BUCKMAN      
(James E. Buckman)


Vice Chairman, General Counsel and Director


March 1, 2004

/s/  
STEPHEN P. HOLMES      
(Stephen P. Holmes)


Vice Chairman and Director


March 1, 2004

/s/  
RONALD L. NELSON      
(Ronald L. Nelson)


Chief Financial Officer and Director


March 1, 2004

/s/  
VIRGINIA M. WILSON      
(Virginia M. Wilson)


Executive Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer


March 1, 2004

/s/  
MYRA J. BIBLOWIT      
(Myra J. Biblowit)


Director


March 1, 2004

/s/  
LEONARD S. COLEMAN      
(Leonard S. Coleman)


Director


March 1, 2004

76



/s/  
MARTIN L. EDELMAN      
(Martin L. Edelman)


Director


March 1, 2004

/s/  
GEORGE HERRERA      
(George Herrera)


Director


March 1, 2004

/s/  
CHERYL D. MILLS      
(Cheryl D. Mills)


Director


March 1, 2004

/s/  
BRIAN MULRONEY      
(The Right Honourable Brian Mulroney)


Director


March 1, 2004

/s/  
ROBERT E. NEDERLANDER      
(Robert E. Nederlander)


Director


March 1, 2004

/s/  
ROBERT W. PITTMAN      
(Robert W. Pittman)


Director


March 1, 2004

/s/  
PAULINE D. E. RICHARDS      
(Pauline D. E. Richards)


Director


March 1, 2004

/s/  
SHELI Z. ROSENBERG      
(Sheli Z. Rosenberg)


Director


March 1, 2004

/s/  
ROBERT F. SMITH      
(Robert F. Smith)


Director


March 1, 2004

77



INDEX TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS


Page
Independent Auditors' ReportF-2

Consolidated Statements of Income for the years ended December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001


F-3

Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2003 and 2002


F-4

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001


F-5

Consolidated Statements of Stockholders' Equity for the years ended December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001


F-7

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements


F-9

F-1



INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT

To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of Cendant Corporation:

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Cendant Corporation and subsidiaries (the "Company") as of December 31, 2002, Trilegiant owed us $4 million. We also recognized approximately $23 million2003 and $8 million of revenues during 2002, and 2001, respectively,the related to travel agency services provided to Trilegiant in connection with the provisionconsolidated statements of fulfillment services to membersincome, cash flows and stockholders' equity for each of the travel related clubsthree years in the period ended December 31, 2003. These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the consolidated financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America. Those standards require that we plan and programs.perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

AsIn our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above Trilegiantpresent fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of the Company at December 31, 2003 and 2002, and the consolidated results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2003 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

As discussed in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements, on January 1, 2003, the Company adopted the fair value method of accounting for stock-based compensation, and during 2003, the Company adopted the consolidation provisions for variable interest entities. Also, as discussed in Note 2, on January 1, 2002, the Company adopted the non-amortization provisions for goodwill and other indefinite-lived intangible assets. Also, as discussed in Note 2, on January 1, 2001, the Company modified the accounting treatment relating to securitization transactions and the accounting for derivative instruments and hedging activities.

/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP
New York, New York
February 25, 2004

F-2



Cendant Corporation and Subsidiaries
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
(In millions, except per share data)

 
 Year Ended December 31,
 
 
 2003
 2002
 2001
 
Revenues          
 Service fees and membership, net $12,491 $10,062 $5,426 
 Vehicle-related  5,645  4,078  3,214 
 Other  56  47  53 
  
 
 
 
Net revenues  18,192  14,187  8,693 
  
 
 
 
Expenses          
 Operating  9,408  6,820  2,738 
 Vehicle depreciation, lease charges and interest, net  2,487  2,094  1,789 
 Marketing and reservation  1,756  1,392  1,114 
 General and administrative  1,368  1,120  965 
 Non-program related depreciation and amortization  518  466  477 
 Non-program related interest, net:          
  Interest expense (net of interest income of $21, $41 and $91)  307  262  252 
  Early extinguishment of debt  58  42   
 Acquisition and integration related costs:          
  Amortization of pendings and listings  20  256   
  Other  34  29  112 
 Litigation and related charges, net  11  103  86 
 Restructuring and other unusual charges  (6) (14) 379 
 Mortgage servicing rights impairment      94 
  
 
 
 
Total expenses  15,961  12,570  8,006 
  
 
 
 
Gains on dispositions of businesses      443 
  
 
 
 
Losses on dispositions of businesses      (26)
  
 
 
 
Impairment of investments      (441)
  
 
 
 
Income before income taxes, minority interest and equity in Homestore  2,231  1,617  663 
Provision for income taxes  745  544  220 
Minority interest, net of tax  21  22  24 
Losses related to equity in Homestore, net of tax      77 
  
 
 
 
Income from continuing operations  1,465  1,051  342 
Income from discontinued operations, net of tax    51  81 
Loss on disposal of discontinued operations, net of tax    (256)  
  
 
 
 
Income before cumulative effect of accounting changes  1,465  846  423 
Cumulative effect of accounting changes, net of tax  (293)   (38)
  
 
 
 
Net income $1,172 $846 $385 
  
 
 
 

CD common stock earnings per share:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
 Basic          
  Income from continuing operations $1.44 $1.03 $0.37 
  Net income  1.15  0.83  0.42 
 Diluted          
  Income from continuing operations $1.41 $1.01 $0.36 
  Net income  1.13  0.81  0.41 

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

F-3



Cendant Corporation and Subsidiaries
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(In millions, except share data)

 
 December 31,
 
 
 2003
 2002
 
ASSETS       
Current assets:       
 Cash and cash equivalents $840 $126 
 Restricted cash  448  307 
 Receivables (net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $160 and $136)  1,671  1,457 
 Deferred income taxes  455  334 
 Other current assets  1,064  1,108 
  
 
 
Total current assets  4,478  3,332 

Property and equipment, net

 

 

1,803

 

 

1,780

 
Deferred income taxes  668  1,115 
Goodwill  11,119  10,699 
Other intangibles, net  2,402  2,464 
Other non-current assets  974  1,327 
  
 
 
Total assets exclusive of assets under programs  21,444  20,717 
  
 
 
Assets under management and mortgage programs:       
 Program cash  542  354 
 Mortgage loans held for sale  2,494  1,923 
 Relocation receivables  534  239 
 Vehicle-related, net  10,143  10,052 
 Timeshare-related, net  1,803  675 
 Mortgage servicing rights, net  1,641  1,380 
 Derivatives related to mortgage servicing rights  316  385 
 Other  120  172 
  
 
 
   17,593  15,180 
  
 
 
Total assets $39,037 $35,897 
  
 
 

LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
Current liabilities:       
 Accounts payable and other current liabilities $4,688 $4,287 
 Current portion of long-term debt  1,629  30 
 Deferred income  854  680 
  
 
 
Total current liabilities  7,171  4,997 

Long-term debt, excluding Upper DECS

 

 

3,510

 

 

5,571

 
Upper DECS  863  863 
Deferred income  311  320 
Other non-current liabilities  888  692 
  
 
 
Total liabilities exclusive of liabilities under programs  12,743  12,443 
  
 
 

Liabilities under management and mortgage programs:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
 Debt  9,141  12,747 
 Debt due to AESOP Funding II, LLC—related party  5,644   
 Derivatives related to mortgage servicing rights  231   
 Deferred income taxes  1,092  1,017 
  
 
 
   16,108  13,764 
  
 
 
Mandatorily redeemable preferred interest in a subsidiary    375 
  
 
 

Commitments and contingencies (Note 19)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Stockholders' equity:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
 Preferred stock, $.01 par value—authorized 10 million shares; none issued and outstanding     
 CD common stock, $.01 par value—authorized 2 billion shares; issued 1,260,397,204 and
1,238,952,970 shares
  13  12 
 Additional paid-in capital  10,284  10,090 
 Retained earnings  4,430  3,258 
 Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)  209  (14)
 CD treasury stock, at cost—251,553,531 and 207,188,268 shares  (4,750) (4,031)
  
 
 
Total stockholders' equity  10,186  9,315 
  
 
 
Total liabilities and stockholders' equity $39,037 $35,897 
  
 
 

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

F-4



Cendant Corporation and Subsidiaries
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(In millions)

 
 Year Ended December 31,
 
 
 2003
 2002
 2001
 
Operating Activities          
Net income $1,172 $846 $385 
Adjustments to arrive at income from continuing operations  293  205  (43)
  
 
 
 
Income from continuing operations  1,465  1,051  342 

Adjustments to reconcile income from continuing operations to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities exclusive of management and mortgage programs:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
 Non-program related depreciation and amortization  518  466  477 
 Amortization of pendings and listings  20  256   
 Gain on dispositions of business      (443)
 Losses on dispositions of business      26 
 Impairment of investments      441 
 Proceeds from sales of trading securities      110 
 Deferred income taxes  453  425  418 
 Net change in assets and liabilities, excluding the impact of acquisitions and dispositions:          
  Receivables  32  (74) 10 
  Income taxes  292  46  (201)
  Accounts payable and other current liabilities  (171) (37) 530 
  Payment of stockholder litigation settlement liability    (2,850)  
  Deferred income  (85) (210) (162)
 Proceeds from termination of fair value hedges  200  65   
 Other, net  189  (52) (171)
  
 
 
 
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities exclusive
of management and mortgage programs
  2,913  (914) 1,377 
  
 
 
 
Management and mortgage programs:          
 Vehicle depreciation  2,031  1,742  1,403 
 Amortization and impairment of mortgage servicing rights  893  922  287 
 Net gain on mortgage servicing rights and related derivatives  (163) (115) (3)
 Origination of mortgage loans  (62,843) (44,017) (40,963)
 Proceeds on sale of and payments from mortgage loans held for sale  64,371  43,459  40,643 
  
 
 
 
   4,289  1,991  1,367 
  
 
 
 
Net cash provided by operating activities  7,202  1,077  2,744 
  
 
 
 
Investing Activities          
Property and equipment additions  (463) (399) (329)
Net assets acquired (net of cash acquired of $99, $178 and $308) and acquisition-related payments  (327) (1,381) (2,757)
Proceeds received on asset sales  133  21  26 
Proceeds from sales of available-for-sale securities  4  14  17 
Purchases of non-marketable securities  (63) (3) (101)
Proceeds from (payments to) stockholder litigation settlement trust    1,410  (1,060)
Proceeds from dispositions of businesses, net of transaction-related payments    1,151  109 
Other, net  145  (46) (95)
  
 
 
 
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities exclusive
of management and mortgage programs
  (571) 767  (4,190)
  
 
 
 

F-5


Management and mortgage programs:          
 (Increase) decrease in program cash  (110) 676  (579)
 Investment in vehicles  (14,782) (10,643) (8,144)
 Payments received on investment in vehicles  13,026  7,988  7,142 
 Origination of timeshare-related assets  (1,015) (1,031) (490)
 Principal collection of investment in timeshare-related assets  799  952  538 
 Equity advances on homes under management  (5,699) (5,968) (6,306)
 Repayment on advances on homes under management  5,635  6,028  6,340 
 Additions to mortgage servicing rights  (1,008) (928) (955)
 Proceeds from sales of mortgage servicing rights  10  16  58 
 Cash received on derivatives related to mortgage servicing rights, net  295  370  163 
 Other, net  20  26  10 
  
 
 
 
   (2,829) (2,514) (2,223)
  
 
 
 
Net cash used in investing activities  (3,400) (1,747) (6,413)
  
 
 
 
Financing Activities          
Proceeds from borrowings  2,593  637  5,608 
Principal payments on borrowings  (3,479) (2,111) (2,213)
Issuances of common stock  446  112  877 
Repurchases of common stock  (1,090) (278) (254)
Other, net  (86) (56) (148)
  
 
 
 
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities exclusive
of management and mortgage programs
  (1,616) (1,696) 3,870 
  
 
 
 
Management and mortgage programs:          
 Proceeds from borrowings  27,757  15,171  9,460 
 Principal payments on borrowings  (28,495) (14,614) (8,798)
 Net change in short-term borrowings  (702) (114) 116 
 Other, net  (25) (8) (6)
  
 
 
 
   (1,465) 435  772 
  
 
 
 
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities  (3,081) (1,261) 4,642 
  
 
 
 
Effect of changes in exchange rates on cash and cash equivalents  (7) 41  (8)
  
 
 
 
Cash provided by discontinued operations    74  121 
  
 
 
 
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents  714  (1,816) 1,086 
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period  126  1,942  856 
  
 
 
 
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period $840 $126 $1,942 
  
 
 
 
Supplemental Disclosure of Cash Flow Information          
Interest payments $806 $788 $609 
Income tax payments, net $2 $62 $40 

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

F-6



Cendant Corporation and Subsidiaries
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
(In millions)

 
 Common Stock
  
  
 Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Income (Loss)

 Treasury Stock
  
 
 
 Additional
Paid-in
Capital

 Retained
Earnings

 Total
Stockholders'
Equity

 
 
 Shares
 Amount
 Shares
 Amount
 
Balance at January 1, 2001 917 $9 $4,540 $2,027 $(234)(179)$(3,568)$2,774 
Comprehensive income:                       
Net income       385         
Currency translation adjustment         (65)      
Unrealized losses on cash flow hedges, net of tax of ($22)         (33)      
Unrealized gains on available-for-sale securities, net of tax of $21         33       
Reclassification for realized holding losses, net of tax of $29         56       
Minimum pension liability adjustment, net of tax of ($13)         (21)      
Total comprehensive income                     355 
Issuances of CD common stock 108  1  2,342         2,343 
Exercise of stock options 26    237     2  27  264 
Tax benefit from exercise of stock options     59         59 
Repurchases of CD common stock          (12) (226) (226)
Repurchases of Move.com common stock (2)   (75)        (75)
Present value of forward purchase contract distributions and related costs     (48)        (48)
Modifications to stock options     25         25 
Issuance of CD common stock and conversion of stock options for acquisitions 117  1  1,604         1,605 
Other     (8)        (8)
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Balance at December 31, 2001 1,166  11  8,676  2,412  (264)(189) (3,767) 7,068 

Comprehensive income:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
Net income       846         
Currency translation adjustment         66       
Reclassification of foreign currency translation losses realized upon the sale of NCP         245       
Unrealized losses on cash flow hedges, net of tax of ($5)         (8)      
Unrealized losses on available-for-sale securities, net of tax of ($12)         (19)      
Reclassification for realized holding losses, net of tax of $2         3       
Minimum pension liability adjustment, net of tax of ($23)         (37)      
Total comprehensive income                     1,096 
Issuances of CD common stock 6    62         62 
Exercise of stock options 8    72     2  27  99 
Tax benefit from exercise of stock options     25         25 
Repurchases of CD common stock          (20) (291) (291)
Issuance of CD common stock and conversion of stock options for acquisitions 59  1  1,139         1,140 
Issuance of subsidiary stock     98         98 
Other     18         18 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Balance at December 31, 2002 1,239  12  10,090  3,258  (14)(207) (4,031) 9,315 

F-7



Cendant Corporation and Subsidiaries
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY (Continued)
(In millions)

 
 Common Stock
  
  
 Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Income (Loss)

 Treasury Stock
  
 
 
 Additional
Paid-in
Capital

 Retained
Earnings

 Total
Stockholders'
Equity

 
 
 Shares
 Amount
 Shares
 Amount
 
Balance at January 1, 2003 1,239  12  10,090  3,258  (14)(207) (4,031) 9,315 
Comprehensive income:                       
Net income       1,172         
Currency translation adjustment         143       
Unrealized gains on cash flow hedges, net of tax of $27         38       
Unrealized gains on available-for-sale securities, net of tax of $25         45       
Reclassification for realized holding gains, net of tax of ($1)         (3)      
Total comprehensive income                     1,395 
Issuances of CD common stock      (4)    1  21  17 
Exercise of stock options 21    75     19  359  434 
Tax benefit from exercise of stock options     106         106 
Repurchases of CD common stock          (65) (1,099) (1,099)
Amortization of deferred compensation     15         15 
Other   1  2         3 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Balance at December 31, 2003 1,260 $13 $10,284 $4,430 $209 (252)$(4,750)$10,186 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

F-8



Cendant Corporation and Subsidiaries
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unless otherwise noted, all amounts are in millions, except per share amounts)

1.     Basis of Presentation

F-9


2.     Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

 
 Assets
 Liabilities
Bishop's Gate(a) $1,720 $1,651
Trilegiant(b)  97  405
AESOP Funding(c)  264  264

F-10


F-11


 
 Year Ended December 31,
 
 
 2003
 2002
 2001
 
Reported net income $1,172 $846 $385 
Add back: Stock-based employee compensation expense included in reported net income, net of tax(a)  10  2  15 
Less: Total stock-based employee compensation expense determined under fair value based method for all awards, net of tax(b)  (50) (297) (233)
  
 
 
 
Pro forma net income $1,132 $551 $167 
  
 
 
 
Earnings per share:          
Reported          
 Basic $1.15 $0.83 $0.42 
 Diluted  1.13  0.81  0.41 
Pro forma          
 Basic $1.11 $0.54 $0.17 
 Diluted  1.09  0.53  0.16 

F-12


F-13


F-14


F-15


F-16


F-17


F-18


        Financial Services

F-19


F-20




2001
Investment in Homestore, Inc.$(407)
Other(*)(34)

$(441)


 
 As of December 31,
 
 2003
 2002
Trading—retained interest in securitized timeshare receivables $81 $274
Available for sale:      
 Mortgage-backed securities  102  114
 Retained interest in securitized relocation receivables    91
  
 
Total $183 $479
  
 

F-21


F-22