QuickLinks -- Click here to rapidly navigate through this document



UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549


FORM 10-K

(Mark One)

ý

ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2002


For the Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2003

or

o

TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from                             to                              

Commission file number 333-11811


ELDORADO RESORTS LLC
ELDORADO CAPITAL CORP.
(Exact names of registrants as specified in their charters)

Nevada
Nevada
88-0115550
Nevada88-0367075
(State or Other Jurisdiction of
Incorporation or Organization)
 88-0115550
88-0367075
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)

345 North Virginia Street, Reno, Nevada 89501
(Address of principal executive offices, including zip code)

(775) 786-5700
(Registrants' telephone number, including area code)

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: None

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None

345 North Virginia Street, Reno, Nevada 89501
(Address of principal executive offices, including zip code)

(775) 786-5700
(Registrants' telephone number, including area code)

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: None

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None


        Indicate by check mark whether the registrants (1) have filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrants were required to file such reports), and (2) have been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ý    No o

        Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrants' knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. ý

        Indicate by check mark whether the registrants are accelerated filers (as defined in Exchange Act Rule 12b-2) Yes o    No ý

        Aggregate market value of the Registrants' voting stock held by non-affiliates of the Registrants:Registrants as of the last business day of the Resistrants' most recently completed second fiscal quarter: None

        Number of shares of common stock of Eldorado Capital Corp. outstanding at March 27, 2003:24, 2004: 2,500 Shares.





PART I

Item 1.    Business.

Introduction

        Eldorado Resorts LLC, a Nevada limited liability company ("Resorts"), was formed to be the successor to Eldorado Hotel Associates Limited Partnership (the "Predecessor Partnership") pursuant to an exchange of all of the then outstanding partnership interests in the Predecessor Partnership for membership interests in Resorts (the "Reorganization"). The Reorganization was effective on July 1, 1996. Insofar as they relate to periods prior to the effective date of the Reorganization, references to Resorts are to the Predecessor Partnership except to the extent the context requires otherwise. Eldorado Capital Corp., a Nevada corporation wholly-owned by Resorts ("Capital"), was incorporated with the sole purpose of serving as co-issuer of $100,000,000 principal amount of 101/2% Senior Subordinated Notes due 2006 issued by Resorts and Capital on July 31, 1996. Accordingly, Capital holds no significant assets and conducts no business activity. Resorts and Capital, together with Eldorado Limited Liability Company, a Nevada limited liability company which is 96% owned by Resorts ("ELLC"), are collectively referred to as the "Company."

        The Company owns and operates the Eldorado Hotel & Casino (the "Eldorado"), a premier hotel/casino and entertainment facility in Reno, Nevada. The Company has established the Eldorado as a luxury destination resort by creating a sophisticated, elegant atmosphere and providing an extraordinary level of personal service and unsurpassed cuisine, a dynamic gaming environment and a wide variety of amenities attractive to multiple market segments. The Eldorado is centrally located in downtown Reno and is easily accessible both to vehicular traffic from Interstate 80, the principal highway linking Reno to its primary visitor markets in northern California, and to pedestrian traffic from nearby casinos. In addition to owning the Eldorado, ELLC owns a 50% interest in a 50/50 joint venture (the "Silver Legacy Joint Venture") which owns the Silver Legacy Resort Casino (the "Silver Legacy"), a major themed hotel/casino located adjacent to the Eldorado. The other partner in the Silver Legacy Joint Venture is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Mandalay Resort Group ("Mandalay").

        In 2000, Resorts acquired a 21.25% interest in Tamarack Junction, a small casino then being constructed in south Reno, which commenced operations September 4, 2001. Tamarack is situated on approximately 22,000 square feet with 5,800 square feet of gaming space which had 243244 slot machines at December 31, 2002.2003. Resorts also owns a 19%an 18% interest in MindPlay LLC, which is developingwas formed to develop, own and market a sophisticated system that, if successfully completed, will permitfor the tracking and surveillance of pit gaming operations. For additional information concerning our interest in these entities and related transactions, including the sale by MindPlay of substantially all of its assets to an unrelated third party, see "Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation" in Item 11 of this report and Item 13 of this report.

Business Strategy

        The Company has a broadan experienced management team that includes, among others, Donald Carano and several members of his immediate family. Donald Carano, the Chief Executive Officer and a member of the Board of Managers of Resorts, co-founded the Eldorado in 1973 and has been the driving force behind its development. In addition to Donald Carano, each of the Company's other seven senior executives has in excess of fifteen years of operating experience in the gaming industry. Management believes that its family-oriented, hands-on approach has enabled the Company to operate the Eldorado successfully for over twenty-fivethirty years. In addition to their roles in management of the Company, members of the Carano family beneficially own 63% of Resorts.

1



        The Company's business strategy draws upon its extensive gaming management experience gained from successfully operating the Eldorado. Key elements of the Company's strategy include the following:

        Personal Service and High Quality Amenities.    One of the cornerstones of the Company's business strategy is to provide its customers with an extraordinary level of personal service. The Company's senior management is actively involved in the daily operations of the Eldorado, frequently interacting with hotel, restaurant and gaming patrons to ensure that they are receiving the highest level of personal attention. Management believes that extraordinary personal service is an integral part of fostering customer loyalty and generating repeat business. Management regularly conducts feedback sessions and focus groups with customers to elicit comments and suggestions on ways it can improve each customer's experience at the Eldorado. Additionally, management personally responds to suggestions made on comment cards placed in each of the Eldorado's hotel rooms. Furthermore, management continually strives to instill in each employee a dedication to superior service designed to exceed guests' expectations.

        In addition to personalized service, the Eldorado has earned a reputation for high quality amenities and an excellent price-to-value relationship. Locals and visitors alike are attracted to the Eldorado's selection of dining venues and exceptional food quality, for which the Eldorado has received national recognition. Management believes that the Eldorado's excellent cuisine adds to the overall atmosphere and prestige of the hotel and therefore emphasizes outstanding food and ambiance and a wide variety of dining choices.

        The Eldorado continually monitors its casino operations to react to changing market conditions and customer demands. The Company targets premium-play customers as well as the value-conscious gaming patron with its state-of-the-art casino featuring the latest in game technology, electronic displays and customer-convenient features.

        Marketing to Target Gaming Patrons.    The Company primarily targets its marketing programs to four segments of the gaming market: the free and independent traveler, preferred casino customers, local patrons and the wholesale/specialty groups.

        The free and independent traveler segment consists of those travelers not affiliated with groups who make their reservations directly with the Eldorado or through independent travel agents. To attract the independent traveler, the Company uses print media, radio, television and direct mail to advertise in northern California, the Pacific Northwest and other regional travel markets.

        Preferred casino customers are those patrons who maintain the necessary level of gaming criteriaactivity to become established casino guests. The Company uses a broad special events agenda and an extensivea guest development program, including providing casino credit, to attract and retain preferred casino customers. In addition, the Company utilizes its quality hotel rooms, excellent restaurant venues and other amenities to offer complimentaries to a broad spectrum of established casino guests, from the frequent players who place relatively modest wagers to the true premium players who consistently wager high amounts. The Company believes that the ability to reward the more modest gaming patrons fosters intense loyalty and repeat business.

        Wholesale/specialty groups consist of those customers participating in travel packages offered by air tour operators, groups of up to 100 people with strong gaming profiles and visitors attending tournaments at the National Bowling Stadium. The Eldorado sales force targets this segment by attending trade shows in order to establish relationships with airlines, travel agents, meeting planners and wholesalers. The Eldorado has developed special marketing programs and tools to cultivate relationships with these air tour operators and specialty groups, including offering familiarization tours of the Eldorado. The Eldorado attempts to utilize this market segment as a means of creating a consistent utilization of its rooms during the calendar year.

2



        We seek to attract and retain local customers through frequent promotions that highlight our quality gaming and dining experience, as well as being an active supporter of numerous Reno market events and organizations.

        The Eldorado has a state-of-the-art, real-time customer tracking system which comprehensively tracks its gaming customers throughout the casino. Customers are given an electronically readable card to insert into slot machines and to provide to floor supervisors at table games. The slot machines automatically transmit gaming data to a central computer and floor supervisors manually enter certain data relating to gaming customers which is then computerized. In 2002, the Eldorado enhanced its customer tracking program with the purchase of several computerized gaming tables from MindPlay LLC. This technologically advanced product, along with our slot tracking system, provides data relating to gaming customers' gaming habits, maximum and minimum wagers, the total amount wagered and length of play and assists us in better providing our customers with prompt recognition and complimentaries based on their levels of gaming. In 2002, the Eldorado enhanced the way its customers can redeem earned complimentaries available for redemption throughout the property. This innovation is enhanced by a friendly, knowledgeable staff and a conveniently located promotion center. In addition, "Club Eldorado," the casino's full-service slot club, offers an array of special events and exciting tournaments and convenient ways of earning complimentaries.

        The cost incurred by the Company for advertising in 20022003 was $4,035,000$3,457,000 compared with $3,946,000$4,035,000 in 2001.2002.

        Strategic Expansion and Improvements.    Since opening the Eldorado in 1973, the Company has employed a strategy of periodic expansion and improvement in order to maintain and enhance its position as a leader in the Reno market. Continuing this strategy, the Company has undertaken a number of improvements over the past five years. In May 1997, the Eldorado opened a state-of-the-art 566-seat showroom which added an entertainment experience that management believes attracts a larger and broader audience of entertainment seekers. The showroom features the only nightly production show of its kind in downtown Reno. In addition, the Company opened a new VIP Lounge in December 1997, offering a relaxing atmosphere, including a complimentary full service bar and VIP room registration for preferred casino customers. In 1998, the Eldorado opened a new slot area across from the property's microbrewery,The Brew Brothers, and a portion ofChoices Restaurant was enclosed and remodeled into a 78-seat Asian cuisine restaurant, theGolden Fortune. In December 1999 the Eldorado opened theBuBinga Lounge, a sophisticated intimate nightclub, featuring live music, a dance floor, and two themed bars, all presented in an elegant atmosphere. In 2000,Choices Restaurant was remodeled adding a sushi bar. In December 2000, two retail outlets across fromThe Brew Brothers were removed and additional slot machines were added. In the first quarter of 2002, the Eldorado began a room renovation project, to be completed in various phases, which is currently expected to be completed in the latter partfirst half of 2005.2006. In December 2003, the Eldorado moved and remodeled its exclusive high-limit slot area on the casino floor, adding a luxurious bar and restrooms. Also completed in December 2003 was a new casino cabaret which features live music and shows various sporting events on its state-of-the-art big screen plasma televisions.

        The Company owns a 31,000 square foot piece of property across the street from and west of the Eldorado which could be used for further expansion of the Eldorado, although there are no immediatecurrent plans for the development of this site.

Eldorado Hotel & Casino

        The Eldorado is centrally positioned in the heart of Reno's prime gaming area and room base. Easily accessible to both foot and vehicular traffic, the Eldorado is strategically located directly off Interstate 80, the principal highway linking the Reno market with San Francisco, Sacramento and other cities in its primary visitor market of northern California. With three towers, including a 26-story tower that lights up with over 2,000 feet of neon at night, the Eldorado is visible from Interstate 80, attracting visitors to the downtown area and generating interest in the property. Management believes the Eldorado serves as a downtown landmark, situated to attract a large volume of foot traffic from other casinos as well as from the local populace. In addition, the Eldorado is easily accessible to visitors competing in and attending the various bowling tournaments that are held in the National Bowling Stadium, which is located just one block away.

3



        As of December 31, 2002,2003, the Eldorado offered approximately 84,000 square feet of gaming space, with approximately 1,7521,587 slot machines, 7063 table games consisting of blackjack, craps, roulette, Pai Gow Poker, Let It Ride®, Caribbean stud poker, mini-baccarat, two keno games and a poker room. The Eldorado's casino includes a mix of slot machines and table games which management believes makes it attractive to both middle-income and premium-play customers. Slot machines, which are offered in

3



denominations from 1 cent to $100, generated approximately 64%65% of the Eldorado's total gaming revenues in 2002.2003. A diverse selection of table games and a variety of table limits allowencourage play from a wide range of gaming customers, which management believes makes the Eldorado one of the premier table games casinos in the Reno market.

        The interior of the hotel is designed to create a European ambiance and offers 816 finely-appointed rooms and suites, including 18 specialty suites, 93 "Eldorado Player's Spa Suites" with bedside spas and 26 one-bedroom andone- or two-bedroom penthouse suites. Hotel guests enjoy panoramic views of Reno's skyline and the majestic Sierra Nevada mountain range. Management believes that attention to detail, decor and architecture have created an identifiable and innovative presence in the Reno market for the Eldorado. In 20022003 and 2001,2002, the Eldorado achieved a 89.0% and 89.6% average hotel occupancy rate of 88.7% and 89.0%, respectively, and an Average Daily Rate ("ADR") of approximately $57 and $56, in 2002 and $59 in 2001.respectively.

        The Eldorado is nationally recognized for its exceptional cuisine. Management believes that the Eldorado's superior cuisine and wide-ranging selection of dining opportunities are crucial factors in attracting and retaining customers. All of the Eldorado's dining venues, which range from buffet to gourmet, offer high quality food at reasonable prices. The following chart details the Eldorado's dining venues, their respective seating capacities and their outstanding attributes, including the awards and distinctions each has received.

4


ELDORADO RESTAURANTS

Dining Venue

 Seating
Capacity

 Description

Roxy 200  A Parisian-style bistro, restaurant and bar with contemporary American influences offering French country fare, steaksteaks and seafood
     Designed by famed restaurant designer Pat Kuleto to feature seven distinct architectural styles
     CalledOne of the Best Bistros in the Gaming World byCasino Player magazine 2003
VotedBest Martini byReno News & Review 2003
VotedBest French Restaurant byCasino Player magazine in 2002
     VotedBest Wine List andBest Martini Bar byCasino Player magazine 2000, 2001 and 2002
     VotedBest Gourmet Restaurant byCasino Player magazine 2000
     ReceivedAward of Excellence fromWine Spectator 1998, 1999 and 2000
     Received prestigiousDiRoNa Award 1999 and 2000

La Strada

 

170

 


 

Features northern Italian cuisine in an Italian countryside villa setting
     NamedOne of the Best in Town byCasino Player magazine 2003
VotedBest Italian Restaurant byCasino Player magazine 1999
     Recipient of theWine Spectator Award of Excellence eight of the last teneleven years, most recently in 2001

The Brew Brothers

 

225

 


 

First microbrewery located in a hotel/casino
     NamedBest Brewpub in northernNorthern Nevada inNevada magazine's Best of Nevada Poll 2002 and 2003

4


     Named area's best saloon inNevada magazine's Best of Nevada Poll 1999, 2000, 2001 and 20021999-2003
     NamedBest Hotel Bar byCasino Player magazine in 2002 and 2003
NamedBest Place for Live Music by Best of Reno 2002 Poll
     NamedBest Brewpub in America byNightclub and Bar magazine 1999
     NamedHighest Selling Brewpub in North America by theInstitute for Brewing Studies 1999

The Prime Rib Grill

 

185

 


 

A spirited, lively steak and seafood house specializing in prime rib and grilled entrees
     Offers top quality USDA choice cuts of beef and fresh seafood and a "never ending" salad and fruit bar with homemade soups

Chefs' Buffet

 

600

 


 

A 220-foot200-foot buffet offering a variety of cuisine, including American, Italian, Chinese, Mexican, Mongolian grill, a pizza station, omelet station and a salad, fruit and ice cream bar
     Features specialty nights including a Friday night seafood buffet
     Serves food fresh from Eldorado's own bakery, butcher shop, pasta shop and gelato factory
     Named BestBest Casino Buffet byReno News and& Review 2002
     NamedBest Buffet byCasino Player magazine 2000

Tivoli Gardens

 

210

 


 

A 24-hour24-hour-a-day restaurant with a menu featuring Asian, Italian Mexican and South AmericanMexican cuisines
     Features the Eldorado Coffee Company, where fresh coffee beans are roasted each day for use throughout the hotel and for retail purchase

Choices Express Cafe

 

227

 


 

A food court offering a variety of American and Italian specialties deli selections and authentic Chinese food along with a sushi bar.bar

Golden Fortune

 

78

 


 

Authentic Hong Kong style cuisine offering 90 specialties in a classic Chinese setting featuring hand blown and stained glass imported from China
     NamedBest Chinese Restaurant byCasino Player magazine 2001 and 2002
Recipient of theInternational Award of Excellence from theRestaurant and Hospitality Rating Bureau

        The Eldorado's selection of high-quality food and beverages reflects the Carano family's emphasis on the dining experience. Eldorado chefs utilize homemade pasta, carefully chosen imported ingredients, fresh seafood and top quality USDA choice cuts of beef. Throughout the property, beverage offerings includeThe Brew Brothers microbrewed beers and wines from the Ferrari Carano Winery.

        The Eldorado features a 566-seat showroom and theBuBinga Lounge, which is an intimate nightclub,nightclub. It also offers a cabaret on the casino floor and a VIP lounge. Other amenities offered by the Eldorado include two retail shops, a versatile 12,400 square foot convention center and an outdoor

5



plaza located diagonal to the Eldorado which hosts a variety of special events. The Eldorado has parking facilities for over 1,0001,100 vehicles including a 656-space self-park garage and a 369-space valet parking facility.

5


Silver Legacy Resort Casino

        The Silver Legacy opened in July 1995 as the first major newly-constructed hotel/casino in the Reno market since 1978 and its first themed mega-resort. Plans for the Silver Legacy were originally formulated in 1993 by the Company and Mandalay, who jointly recognized the potential synergies of constructing a new hotel/casino in between the Eldorado and Mandalay's property, Circus Circus-Reno.

        The Silver Legacy's design is inspired by Nevada's rich mining heritage and the legend of Sam Fairchild, a fictitious silver baron who "struck it rich" on the site of the casino. Silver Legacy's hotel, the tallest building in northern Nevada, is a "Y"-shaped structure with three wings, consisting of 37-, 34- and 31-floor tiers. Silver Legacy's opulent interior showcases a casino built around Sam Fairchild's famed 120-foot tall mining rig, which appears to mine for silver. The rig is situated beneath a 180-foot diameter dome, which is a distinctive landmark on the Reno skyline. The interior surface of the dome features dynamic sound and laser light shows, providing visitors with a unique experience when they are in the casino. The Company's management believes that the Silver Legacy is a "must see" attraction for visitors to the Reno market.

        The Silver Legacy is situated on two city blocks, encompassing 240,000 square feet in downtown Reno. The hotel currently offers 1,710 guest rooms, including 145141 player spa suites, and eight penthouse suites and seven hospitality suites. Many of the Silver Legacy's guest rooms feature views of Reno's skyline and the Sierra Nevada mountain range. The Silver Legacy's 10-story parking facility can accommodate approximately 1,800 vehicles. At December 31, 2002,2003, the Silver Legacy's casino featured approximately 87,300 square feet of gaming space and contained 2,0641,910 slot machines and 8177 table games, including blackjack, craps, roulette, Pai Gow Poker, Let It Ride®, Caribbean stud poker, Baccarat and Pai Gow, a keno lounge and a race and sports book. "Club Legacy," the Silver Legacy's slot club, offers customers exciting special events and tournaments and convenient ways of earning complimentaries.

        The Silver Legacy's dining options are offered in six venues:

        In addition, the hotel sponsors entertainment events which are held in the hotel's convention area. The Silver Legacy's other amenities include retail shops, exercise facilities, a beauty salon and an outdoor swimming pool and sundeck, as well as a video arcade.

6


        The Eldorado, Silver Legacy, and Circus Circus-Reno properties are connected in a "seamless" manner by 200-foot wide skyway corridors. These enclosed corridors serve as entertainment bridgeways

6



between the three properties and house several restaurants and retail shops. The Eldorado, Silver Legacy and Circus Circus-Reno comprise the heart of the Reno market's prime gaming area and room base, providing the most extensive and the broadest variety of gaming, entertainment, lodging and dining amenities in the Reno area, with an aggregate of 4,098 rooms, 20 restaurants and enough parking to accommodate over 6,000 vehicles, and as of December 31, 2002,2003, approximately 5,3284,960 slot machines and 224200 table games. The Company's management believes that the centralized location and critical mass of these three properties, together with the ease of access between the facilities, provide the Eldorado with significant advantages over other freestanding hotel/casinos in the Reno market.

Silver Legacy Joint Venture

        Background.    The Silver Legacy was developed by the Silver Legacy Joint Venture, which was formed pursuant to the Agreement of Joint Venture of Circus and Eldorado Joint Venture dated as of March 1, 1994 (the "Original Joint Venture Agreement"), between ELLC and Galleon, Inc. ("Mandalay Sub"). Under the terms of the Original Joint Venture Agreement, ELLC and Mandalay Sub (each a "Partner" and, together, the "Partners") each acquired a 50% interest in the Silver Legacy Joint Venture (each Partner's "Percentage Interest"). Each of the Partners was obligated to contribute cash or property to the Silver Legacy Joint Venture with a value approximating 15% of the total budgeted cost for developing and constructing the Silver Legacy. To satisfy their respective contribution obligations, ELLC contributed the land on which Silver Legacy was constructed, at an agreed value of $25 million, and $26.9 million in cash, and Mandalay Sub contributed $51.9 million in cash. In addition, pursuant to the Original Joint Venture Agreement, Mandalay Sub's parent corporation, Mandalay Resort Group, provided certain loans to the Silver Legacy Joint Venture relating to the development and construction of the Silver Legacy (the remaining balance of which was repaid in 1997) and also provided credit support for a $230 million credit agreement originally entered into by the Silver Legacy Joint Venture on May 30, 1995 (the "Original Silver Legacy Credit Agreement") to fund the balance of the Silver Legacy's development and construction costs. In return, Mandalay Resort Group received from the Silver Legacy Joint Venture an annual fee equal to 1.5% of the average outstanding principal balance of such financing until March 5, 2002.

        On March 5, 2002, the Partners executed a new amendment and restatement of the Original Joint Venture Agreement (as further amended in April 2002, the "New Joint Venture Agreement"), the terms of which are summarized below, and the Silver Legacy Joint Venture and its wholly-owned finance subsidiary, Silver Legacy Capital Corp., issued $160 million principal amount of 101/8% mortgage notes due 2012 (the "Silver Legacy Notes"). Concurrently with the issuance of the Silver Legacy Notes, the Silver Legacy Joint Venture (i) repaid the entire outstanding balance of the Original Silver Legacy Credit Agreement, (ii) entered into a new senior secured credit facility comprised of a $20.0 million term loan facility that will amortize over a period of five years and a $20.0 million revolving facility with a five year maturity (the "New Silver Legacy Credit Agreement"), and (iii) made distributions of $10.0 million to ELLC and $20.0 million to Mandalay Sub, utilizing the balance of the net proceeds of the Silver Legacy Notes and $26.0 million of borrowings under the New Silver Legacy Credit Agreement. The New Silver Legacy Credit Agreement is secured by a first priority security interest in substantially all of the existing and future assets (other than certain licenses which may not be pledged under applicable law) of the Silver Legacy Joint Venture and a first priority pledge of and security interest in all of the Partnership interests in the Silver Legacy Joint Venture. The Silver Legacy Notes are secured by a security interest in the same assets and pledges of and security interest in the same Partnership interests which are junior to the security interests and pledges securing the New Silver Legacy Credit Agreement.

7



        Silver Legacy Joint Venture Agreement.    The following is a summary of the New Joint Venture Agreement. The summary is qualified in its entirety by reference to the New Joint Venture Agreement, a copy of which is incorporated by reference as Exhibit 10.1.210.1.3 to this report.

7



        Additional Capital Contributions.    The New Joint Venture Agreement provides that the Partners shall not be permitted or required to contribute additional capital to the Silver Legacy Joint Venture without the consent of the Partners, which consent may be given or withheld in each Partner's sole and absolute discretion.

        Partnership Distributions.    Subject to any contractual restrictions to which the Silver Legacy Joint Venture is subject, including the indenture relating to the Silver Legacy Notes, and prior to the occurrence of a "Liquidating Event," the Silver Legacy Joint Venture will be required by the New Joint Venture Agreement to make distributions to its Partners as follows:

        As defined in the New Joint Venture Agreement, the term "Net Cash From Operations" means the gross cash proceeds received by the Silver Legacy Joint Venture, less the following amounts: (i) cash operating expenses and payments of other expenses and obligations of the Silver Legacy Joint Venture, including interest and scheduled principal payments on Silver Legacy Joint Venture indebtedness, including indebtedness owed to the Partners, if any, (ii) all capital expenditures made by the Silver Legacy Joint Venture, and (iii) such reasonable reserves as the Partners deem necessary in good faith and in the best interests of the Silver Legacy Joint Venture to meet anticipated future obligations and liabilities of the Silver Legacy Joint Venture (less any release of reserves previously established, as similarly determined).

        The Managing Partner.    The New Joint Venture Agreement designates Mandalay Sub as the Silver Legacy Joint Venture's managing partner with responsibility and authority for the day-to-day management of the business affairs of the Silver Legacy Joint Venture, including overseeing the day-to-day operations of Silver Legacy and other Silver Legacy Joint Venture business, preparation of the Silver Legacy Joint Venture's budgets and implementation of the decisions made by the Partners. The managing partner is also responsible for the preparation and submission of the Silver Legacy Joint Venture's annual business plan for review and approval by the Silver Legacy Joint Venture's executive committee, utilizing the special voting procedures and the procedure for resolving deadlocks described below.

        The New Joint Venture Agreement provides that the managing partner shall appoint the general manager, subject to approval of the appointment by the executive committee, utilizing the special voting procedures and the procedure for resolving deadlocks described below. Under the terms of the

8



New Joint Venture Agreement, the general manager may be removed by ELLC or Mandalay Sub upon 30 days written notice. The New Joint Venture Agreement also provides that the managing partner shall appoint the other principal senior management of the Silver Legacy Joint Venture and Silver Legacy, who shall perform such functions, duties, and responsibilities as the managing partner may assign, and shall serve at the direction and pleasure of the managing partner.

8


        The New Joint Venture Agreement provides that the unanimous approval of both Partners is required for certain actions, including the admission of an additional partner, the purchase of additional real property, encumbrances on Silver Legacy, sales or other dispositions of all or substantially all of the assets of the Silver Legacy Joint Venture, refinancing or incurrence of indebtedness involving in excess of $250,000 other than in the ordinary course of business, capital improvements involving more than $250,000 that are not included in an approved annual business plan, and any obligation, contract, agreement, or commitment with a partner or an affiliate of a partner which is not specifically permitted by the New Joint Venture Agreement.

        Replacement of the Managing Partner.    If the actual net operating results of the business of the Silver Legacy Joint Venture for any four consecutive quarters are less than 80% of the projected amount as set forth in the Silver Legacy Joint Venture's annual business plan, after appropriate adjustments for factors affecting similar business in the vicinity of the Silver Legacy, ELLC may require Mandalay Sub to resign from its position as managing partner.

        In addition, in the event Mandalay Sub resigns as managing partner, ELLC will have the right and option to become the managing partner of the Silver Legacy Joint Venture and assume all the obligations of the managing partner under the New Joint Venture Agreement, or the Partners are required to attempt to appoint a third party to manage the day-to-day business affairs of the Silver Legacy Joint Venture. In such event, if the Partners are unable to agree on a manager, then the Silver Legacy Joint Venture shall be dissolved and liquidated in accordance with the provisions of the New Joint Venture Agreement.

        The Executive Committee.    An executive committee of the Silver Legacy Joint Venture is authorized to review, monitor and oversee the performance of the management of the Silver Legacy. The executive committee of the Silver Legacy Joint Venture shall consist of five members, with three members appointed by the managing partner and two members appointed by the other Partner. In the event that neither of the Partners is the managing partner, then the executive committee shall consist of five members, with two members appointed by each Partner and a fifth member appointed by a third party manager selected by the Partners. Each Partner may, at any time, appoint alternate members to the executive committee and the alternates will have all the powers of a regular committee member in the event of the absence or inability of a regular committee member to serve. With the exception of the special voting procedures described below, each member of the executive committee is entitled to one vote on each matter decided by the executive committee and each action of the executive committee must be approved by a majority of all of the members of the executive committee, who may be present or voting by proxy. The current members of the executive committee are Stephen J. Greathouse, Frank R. Baldwin and Yvette E. Landau, each of whom was appointed by Mandalay Sub, and Robert M. Jones and Gene Carano, each of whom was appointed by ELLC.

        Subject to the requirement of unanimous approval of the Partners for certain actions, the duties of the executive committee include, but are not limited to, (i) reviewing, adjusting, approving, developing, and supervising the Silver Legacy Joint Venture's annual business plan, (ii) reviewing and approving the terms of any loans made to the Silver Legacy Joint Venture, (iii) approving all material purchases, sales, leases or other dispositions of Silver Legacy Joint Venture property, other than in the ordinary course of business, and (iv) approving the appointment of the General Manager, who is the Silver Legacy Joint Venture's Chief Executive Officer, and the Controller, who is the Silver Legacy Joint

9



Venture's Chief Financial Officer and Accounting Officer, and determining the compensation of the General Manager and the Controller.

        The New Joint Venture Agreement provides special voting procedures for the executive committee's approval of the annual business plan, the appointment of the general manager and the determination of the general manager's compensation. In voting on these matters, the members of the executive committee appointed by the managing partner shall have a total of two votes and the

9



members of the executive committee appointed by the other Partner shall have a total of two votes. The managing partner shall designate which two of the three members of the executive committee appointed by the managing partner are to exercise the two votes. If the executive committee is deadlocked in deciding any matter which is subject to the special voting procedures, then the meeting may be adjourned to another meeting date. If the executive committee remains deadlocked with respect to its approval of an annual business plan until the end of the second month of the fiscal year described in the annual business plan, then either Partner may by written notice cause the approval of the annual business plan to be submitted to a nationally recognized accounting firm mutually agreeable to the Partners (the "Accountant") for resolution. The Accountant shall consider the positions of the members of the executive committee and the Partners, and shall decide whether to approve the annual business plan, or to modify the annual business plan and approve it with such modifications. The decision of the Accountant on these matters shall have the same effect as the approval of the annual business plan by the executive committee. If the executive committee remains deadlocked with respect to its approval of the appointment of a general manager for a period of one month following the effective date of the resignation or removal of the previous general manager, then the executive committee shall assume the duties of the general manager until such time as the executive committee can reach a decision on the appointment and compensation of a new general manager. In exercising the duties of the general manager, the executive committee shall act and vote in accordance with the special voting procedures described above. If the executive committee remains deadlocked on the determination of the compensation of the general manager for a period of one month following the first meeting on the proposed compensation, then either Partner may by written notice cause the determination of such compensation to be submitted to the Accountant for resolution. In that event, the Accountant shall consider the positions of the executive committee, and shall adopt a compensation arrangement consistent with the position advocated by at least one member of the executive committee. The decision of the Accountant on any matter which is subject to the special voting procedures shall be final and binding on the executive committee and the Partners.

        Transfer of Partnership Interests.    Except as expressly permitted by the New Joint Venture Agreement, neither Partner may transfer all or any portion of its interest in the Silver Legacy Joint Venture or any rights therein without the unanimous consent of both Partners. The New Joint Venture Agreement provides that a Partner may transfer or convey all or any portion of its interest in the Silver Legacy Joint Venture to an affiliate of such Partner (subject to certain limitations), members of the Partner's family (which includes the Partner's spouse, natural or adoptive lineal descendants, and trusts for their benefit), another Partner, a personal representative of the Partner or any person or entity approved by the unanimous consent of the Partners.

        Unless otherwise agreed by Mandalay Sub, Donald L. Carano or a member of his immediate family acceptable to Mandalay Sub, which acceptance may not be unreasonably withheld, or an affiliate controlled by Donald L. Carano or a member of his immediate family acceptable to Mandalay Sub, which acceptance may not be unreasonably withheld, is required to be the manager of and control ELLC (or, if applicable, any entity that is a permitted transferee and to which ELLC has transferred its interest in the Silver Legacy Joint Venture). Unless otherwise agreed by ELLC, which may not be unreasonably withheld, Mandalay Sub (or, if applicable, any entity that is a permitted transferee and to which Mandalay Sub has transferred its interest in the Silver Legacy Joint Venture) is required to be controlled by Mandalay Resort Group. In the event the limitation in this paragraph with respect to

10



either Partner is breached, the other Partner will have the right (but not be required) to exercise the buy-sell provisions described below.

        Limitation on Partners' Actions.    The New Joint Venture Agreement includes each Partner's covenant and agreement not to (i) take any action to require partition or to compel any sale with respect to its Silver Legacy Joint Venture interest, (ii) take any action to file a certificate of dissolution or its equivalent with respect to itself, (iii) take any action that would cause a bankruptcy of such

10



Partner, (iv) withdraw or attempt to withdraw from the Silver Legacy Joint Venture, (v) exercise any power under the Nevada Uniform Silver Legacy Joint Venture Act to dissolve the Silver Legacy Joint Venture, (vi) transfer all or any portion of its interest in the Silver Legacy Joint Venture (other than as permitted hereunder), (vii) petition for judicial dissolution of the Silver Legacy Joint Venture, or (viii) demand a return of such Partner's contributions or profits (or a bond or other security for the return of such contributions or profits) without the unanimous consent of the Partners. The New Joint Venture Agreement also provides that if a Partner attempts to (A) cause a partition or (B) withdraw from the Silver Legacy Joint Venture or dissolve the Silver Legacy Joint Venture, or otherwise take any action in breach of its aforementioned agreements, the Silver Legacy Joint Venture shall continue and (1) the breaching Partner shall immediately cease to have the authority to act as a Partner, (2) the other Partner shall have the right (but shall not be obligated unless it was so obligated prior to such breach) to manage the affairs of the Silver Legacy Joint Venture, (3) the breaching Partner shall be liable in damages, without requirement of a prior accounting, to the Silver Legacy Joint Venture for all costs and liabilities that the Silver Legacy Joint Venture or any Partner may incur as a result of such breach, (4) distributions to the breaching Partner shall be reduced to 75% of the distributions otherwise payable to the breaching Partner and (5) the breaching Partner shall continue to be liable to the Silver Legacy Joint Venture for any obligations of the Silver Legacy Joint Venture pursuant to the New Joint Venture Agreement, and to be jointly and severally liable with the other Partners for any debts and liabilities (whether actual or contingent, known or unknown) of the Silver Legacy Joint Venture existing at the time the breaching Partner withdraws or dissolves.

        Buy-Sell Provision.    At any time on or after July 1, 2005 either Partner (provided such Partner is not in default of any of the provisions of the New Joint Venture Agreement) may make an offer to purchase ("Offer") the interest of the other Partner, which will constitute an irrevocable offer by the Partner giving the Offer either to (i) purchase all, but not less than all, of the interest of the Silver Legacy Joint Venture of the other Partner free of liens and encumbrances for the amount specified in the Offer (the "Sales Price"), or (ii) sell all, but not less than all, of its interest in the Silver Legacy Joint Venture free of liens and encumbrances to the other Partner for the amount specified in the Offer (the "Purchase Price"). The Partner receiving an Offer will have a period of two months to accept the Offer to sell at the Sales Price or, in the alternative, to require that the offering Partner sell its interest to the other Partner at the Purchase Price. The closing of the transaction for the sale or purchase of the Silver Legacy Joint Venture interest shall occur not later than six months after the notice of election or at such other time as may be required by the Nevada Gaming Authorities. Subject to any agreements to which the Silver Legacy Joint Venture is a party, the Partner purchasing the Silver Legacy Joint Venture interest (the "Purchasing Partner") shall be entitled to encumber the Silver Legacy Joint Venture property in order to finance the purchase, provided that the other Partner (the "Selling Partner") will have no liability, contingent or otherwise, under such financing. The Purchasing Partner may assign all or part of its right to purchase the Silver Legacy Joint Venture interest of the Selling Partner to an affiliate of the Purchasing Partner, provided that no such assignment relieves the Purchasing Partner of its obligations in the event of a default by the affiliate.

        Dissolution, Winding Up and Liquidation.    The New Joint Venture Agreement provides that the Silver Legacy Joint Venture shall dissolve and commence winding up and liquidating upon the first to occur of any of (i) January 1, 2053, (ii) the sale of all or substantially all of the Silver Legacy Joint Venture property, (iii) the unanimous vote of the Partners to dissolve, wind up, and liquidate the Silver

11



Legacy Joint Venture, (iv) the happening of any other event that makes it unlawful or impossible to carry on the business of the Silver Legacy Joint Venture, (v) the occurrence of an Event of Bankruptcy (as defined the New Joint Venture Agreement) of a Partner, or (vi) the Partners are unable to agree upon a replacement managing partner as provided in the New Joint Venture Agreement (each, a "Liquidating Event").

11



        The New Joint Venture Agreement also includes the Partners' agreement that the Silver Legacy Joint Venture shall not dissolve prior to the occurrence of a Liquidating Event, notwithstanding any provision of the Nevada Uniform Silver Legacy Joint Venture Act to the contrary. If it is determined by a court of competent jurisdiction that the Silver Legacy Joint Venture has dissolved prior to the occurrence of a Liquidating Event, the Partners have agreed to continue the business of the Silver Legacy Joint Venture without a winding up or liquidation.

        Upon the occurrence of a Liquidating Event, the Silver Legacy Joint Venture will continue solely for the purpose of winding up its affairs in an orderly manner, liquidating its assets, and satisfying the claims of its creditors and Partners. The managing partner will be responsible for overseeing the winding up and liquidation of the Silver Legacy Joint Venture, taking full account of the Silver Legacy Joint Venture's liabilities and assets, causing the assets to be liquidated as promptly as is consistent with obtaining the fair market value thereof, and causing the proceeds therefrom, to the extent sufficient therefor, to be applied and distributed (i) first, to the payment and discharge of all of the Silver Legacy Joint Venture's debts and liabilities to creditors other than Partners, (ii) second, to the payment and discharge of all of the Silver Legacy Joint Venture's debts and liabilities to Partners, and (iii) the balance, if any, to the Partners in the amount of their respective capital accounts, after giving effect to all contributions, distributions, and allocations for all periods or portions thereof.

Reno Market

        The Reno market, one of the larger gaming markets in the United States, generated approximately $900 million of gaming revenues in 2002. As of December 31, 2002, the Reno market featured approximately 16,049 hotel rooms, 23,534 slot machines and 680 table games. For the twelve months ended December 31, 2002, the Reno market had an estimated 75.2% average hotel occupancy rate.

        Reno is the second largest metropolitan area in Nevada, with a population of approximately 348,000357,000 according to the most recently available U. S.U.S. census data, and is located at the base of the Sierra Nevada Mountains along Interstate 80, approximately 135 miles east of Sacramento, California and 225 miles east of San Francisco, California. Reno is a destination resort market that primarily attracts "drive-in" visitors by offering gaming as well as numerous other summer and winter recreational activities. In addition to gaming, the Reno area features numerous national forests, mountains and lakes (including Lake Tahoe) and offers outstanding year-round opportunities for outdoor activities of all types. Management believes that approximately two-thirds of visitors to the Reno market arrive by some form of ground transportation. The Reno area enjoys relatively mild weather, with abundant sunshine throughout the year and low humidity. Reno's annual snowfall is modest, although heavier snowfall in the mountain passes around Reno can obstruct traffic to Reno. Special annual events in the Reno area include Hot August Nights, the National Championship Air Races, the Reno Balloon Races, Street Vibrations, the Reno/Tahoe Open PGA golf tournament and the Reno Rodeo. According to the Reno-Sparks Convention and Visitors Authority (the "Visitors Authority") and the Nevada Commission on Tourism, the greater Reno area attracted an estimated 4.94.7 million visitors for the twelve months ended June 30, 20022003 compared to 5.24.9 million for the same period in 2001.2002.

        Approvals have been obtained for two public works projects in the downtown area of Reno. The first project will lower the train tracks which run between Reno's downtown district and separate the Eldorado and the two adjoining properties from the rest of the downtown gaming facilities.

12



Construction on this project, which commenced in early 2003, is expected to be completed in 2006 and will be organized in such a manner that it will not prevent pedestrian or vehicular traffic from crossing the railroad tracks within the downtown area.2006. The second project involves the construction of a downtown special events center next to the National Bowling Stadium. ThisConstruction of this project iscommenced in Janaury 2004 and expected to be finishedcompleted in 2005. At this time,December 2004. While we believe the construction of these projects has had a minimal impact on our operations, we cannot determine the effect of these projects on our operations, particularlytheir impact during their remaining periods of construction periods.or after their completion.

12



        The following table sets forth certain statistical information for the Reno market for the years 19981999 through 20022003 as reported by the Visitors Authority, the Nevada Commission on Tourism and the Nevada State Gaming Control Board.

The Reno Market


 The Reno Market
 

 1998
 1999
 2000
 2001
 2002
  1999
 2000
 2001
 2002
 2003
 
Gaming Revenues (000's)(1) $929,844 $968,531 $1,026,700 $961,664 $917,005  $968,531 $1,026,700 $961,664 $917,005 $895,991 

Gaming Positions(2)(3)

 

30,816

 

30,526

 

30,951

 

27,712

 

27,872

 
 30,526 30,951 27,712 27,872 25,242 

Hotel Rooms(2)

 

15,271

 

15,957

 

16,515

 

15,459

 

16,049

 
 15,957 16,515 15,459 16,049 16,193 

Average Hotel Occupancy Rate(1)

 

79.1

%

 

78.8

%

 

78.3

%

 

76.9

%

 

75.2

%
 78.8% 78.3% 76.9% 75.2% 74.3%

Visitors(4)

 

5,121,693

 

5,051,101

 

5,185,393

 

5,164,474

 

4,885,510

 
 5,051,101 5,185,393 5,164,474 4,885,510 4,681,535 

(1)
For the twelve months ended December 31 for each period shown.

(2)
As of December 31 for each period shown.

(3)
Calculated from information provided by the Nevada State Gaming Control Board.

(4)
For the twelve months ended June 30 for each period shown.

        The National Bowling Stadium, located approximately one block from the Eldorado and Silver Legacy, opened in February 1995 at a reported cost of approximately $48 million. The state-of-the-art facility, which features 80 bowling lanes, has been selected to host tournaments for the American Bowling Congress (the "ABC") and the Women's International Bowling Congress (the "WIBC") two of every three years through 2009 and is expected to host many other tournaments for other bowling organizations. The National Bowling Stadium was the site of the WIBC's National Championship Bowling Tournament in 1997, 2000 and 20002003 and has been selected as the site of that tournament in 2003, 2006 and 2009. The National Bowling Stadium was the site of the ABC's National Championship Bowling Tournament in 1998 and 2001 and has been selected as the site of that tournament in 2004, 2007, 2010, 2013 and 2007.2016. According to the Visitors Authority, bowling tournaments held at the National Bowling Stadium attract visitors from markets that do not normally contribute substantially to Reno's visitor profile. The National Bowling Stadium also features a large-screen movie theater, nightclub and retail space and can be configured to host special events and conventions.

        At December 31, 2002,2003, nine scheduled airlines and a number of other charter airlines were providing daily departures on 7489 flights betweenfrom Reno andto approximately 1617 other North American cities, providing outbound available seats for more than 9,012over 10,000 people daily. The primary user of the airport is Southwest Airlines, with approximately 41 daily outbound flights as of December 31, 2002.2003. The Eldorado and the Silver Legacy are within a 10-minute drive of the airport, making them easily accessible to visitors traveling to Reno by air.

Competition

        The gaming industry includes land-based casinos, dockside casinos, riverboat casinos, casinos located on Native American reservations and other forms of legalized gaming. There is intense

13



competition among companies in the gaming industry, many of which have significantly greater resources than we do. Certain states have legalized casino gaming and other states may legalize gaming in the future. Legalized casino gaming in these states and on Native American reservations near our markets or changes to gaming laws in states surrounding Nevada could increase competition and could adversely affect our operations. The Company also competes to a lesser extent, with gaming facilities in other jurisdictions with dockside gaming facilities, state-sponsored lotteries, on-and-off track pari-mutuel wagering, Internet gaming, card clubs, riverboat casinos and other forms of legalized gambling.

13



        The Company competes for customers primarily on the basis of locations,location, range and pricing of amenities and overall atmosphere. Of the 35 casinos currently operating in the Reno market, the Company competes principally with the eight other hotel-casinos that, like the Eldorado, each generate at least $36 million in annual gaming revenues, including the Silver Legacy. Although no hotel-casino projects are currently under construction in the Reno area, we cannot predict the extent to which new projects will be undertaken or the extent to which current hotel and/or casino space may be expanded in the near future. The Company expects that any additional rooms added in the Reno market will increase competition for visitor revenue. There can be no assurance that any growth in Reno's current room base or gaming capacity will not adversely affect our financial condition or results of operations. The Company also competes with hotel-casinos located in the nearby Lake Tahoe region as well as those in Las Vegas, Nevada. A substantial number of customers travel to both Reno and the Lake Tahoe area during their visits. Consequently, the Company believes that the Eldorado's success is influenced to some degree by the success of the Lake Tahoe market. While the Company does not anticipate a decline in the popularity of either Reno or Lake Tahoe as tourtourist destination areas in the foreseeable future, any such decline could adversely affect our operation.operations.

        Land-based, riverboat, or dockside casino gaming (other than that conducted on Native American-owned land) is currently legal in ten11 states and casino gaming on Native American-owned land is legal in at least 29a number of states, including California, Washington, and Oregon. Management believes the Reno market draws over 50% of its visitors from California. In addition to gaming on Native American-owned land, California allows other non-casino style gaming, including pari-mutuel wagering, a state-sponsored lottery, card clubs, bingo, and off-track betting. The competitive impact on Nevada gaming establishments, in general, and our operations, in particular, from the continued growth of gaming outside Nevada cannot be determined at this time. The Company believes that the expansion of casino gaming on Native American lands in California, and to a lesser extent in Washington and Oregon, could have a material adverse affect on its operations depending on the nature, location, and scope of those operations.

        On March 7, 2000, California voters approved Proposition 1A which amended the California constitution and legalized "Nevada-style" gaming on Native American reservations. The passage of this amendment has allowed the expansion of existing Native American gaming operations, as well as the opening of new Native American gaming facilities. Additionally, numerous tribes have announced that they intend to open gaming facilities.facilities in California. There are approximately 107 federally recognized Native American tribes in California. In order to conduct gaming operations in California, aA total of 61 Native American tribe must entertribes entered into a compactcompacts with the state. As of December 31, 2002, the State of California hadduring 1999 and 2000 that are currently in effect. Each of these Native American tribes may operate up to two gaming facilities. Nine of these Native American tribes are presently not operating a casino. Two Native American tribes entered into compacts with approximately 61 tribes.the State of California in 2003 that are currently in effect. Each of these Native American tribetribes may operate one gaming facility; however, neither is presently operating a casino. Under action taken by the National Indian Gaming Commission, gaming devices similar in California is limitedappearance to slot machines, but which are deemed to be technological enhancements to bingo style gaming, are not subject to such limits and may be used by tribes without state permission. Currently there are 53 Native American casinos in operation in the State of California. These Native American tribes are currently allowed to operate a maximum of 2,000 slot machines, and there may not be more than two gaming facilities on any one reservation. Underas well as other games. Certain compacts are currently being renegotiated with the Governor of California's interpretationstate. While the outcome of the compacts, all Native American tribesnegotiations is yet to be determined, the possibility exists that the current facilities operating in California are permittedwill be allowed to operate a totalexpand the scope and size of approximately 45,000 slot machines. However, there remains substantial uncertainty as totheir operations, including an increase in the total number of slot machines authorized by the compacts and it is possible that the approximately 45,000-machine limit will increase, and, if so, the increase may be substantial. The 20-year compacts have a one-time negotiation clause that must be executed in 2003. While the tribes are not required to renegotiate their compacts, approximately 21 tribes are expected to begin negotiations with the Governor of California beginning in March 2003 inmachines.

14



an effort to obtain the right to operate more slot machines than the current maximum allowance per tribe of 2,000. In addition to allowing the expansion of slot machines, the compacts allow for the expansion of other casino-style games, including blackjack and poker. Most        Many existing Native American gaming facilities in northern California are modest compared to Reno market casinos. However, there are several more significant Native American casinos which currently compete with the Reno market, including: (1) the Cache Creek Indian Bingo & Casino in Brooks, California, approximately 58 miles northwest of Sacramento and (2) the Jackson Rancheria Casino, Hotel and Conference Center in Jackson, California, approximately 59 miles southeast of Sacramento and (3) the Thunder Valley Casino in Auburn, California, approximately 21 miles northeast of Sacramento. Thunder Valley Casino opened on June 9, 2003 and offers approximately 1,906 slot machines and 111 table games, dining and entertainment amenities and parking for 4,500 vehicles. This project has been open approximately eight months, and during the third and fourth quarter of 2003, we

14



believe it had a significant impact on our operating results. Based on its size, proximity, and potential expansion capabilities, we believe Thunder Valley Casino could further impact our operations in the future. While we cannot predict the extent of the future impact, it could be significant. Management believes the greatest impact from Thunder Valley Casino to the Eldorado's customer base is to its day-trippers, those patrons whose visit is for one day and does not include an overnight stay. These customers are typically not tracked players, as they tend not to be as loyal a customer as those who visit for more than one day at a time. Day-trippers primarily visit Reno in the second and third quarters when the weather is more favorable.

        In addition to the existing gaming facilities, numerous Native American tribes have announced that they are in the process of developing or are considering establishing large-scale hotel and gaming facilities in northern California, including two which have entered into development and management agreements with established gaming operators. Station Casinos, Inc. has entered into agreements with the United Auburn Indian Community to develop and manage Thunder Valley Casino, a gaming and entertainment facility being constructed on a 49-acre site approximately 21 miles northeast of Sacramento. Station Casinos, Inc. has announced that Thunder Valley Casino is anticipated to offer between 1,250 and 2,000 slot machines and 100 table games, dining and entertainment amenities, and parking for 3,000 vehicles. Construction is reported to have commenced in October 2002 with the property to be completed in phases, including an anticipated opening of the casino in the June or July 2003.California. Other tribes are at various stages of planning new or expanded facilities in northern California, including facilities within a one hourone-hour drive of San Francisco or Sacramento.

        The competitive impact on Nevada gaming establishments, in general, and our operations, in particular, from the continued growth of gaming outside Nevada cannot be determined at this time. However, the Company believes that the expansion of casino gaming on Native American lands in California, and to a lesser extent in Washington and Oregon, could have a material adverse affect on future operations, depending on the nature, location, and scope of those operations.

Nevada Regulation and Licensing

        The ownership and operation of casino gaming facilities in Nevada are subject to the Nevada Gaming Control Act (the "Nevada Act") and regulations promulgated thereunder as well as various local regulations. The Company's gaming operations are subject to the licensing and regulatory control of the Nevada Gaming Commission (the "Nevada Commission"), the Nevada State Gaming Control Board (the "Nevada Board") and various local and governmental authorities (collectively with the Nevada Commission and the Nevada Board, the "Nevada Gaming Authorities"). The laws, regulations and supervisory procedures of the Nevada Gaming Authorities are based upon declarations of public policy which seek to, among other things, (i) prevent unsavory or unsuitable persons from having any direct or indirect involvement with gaming at any time or in any capacity, (ii) establish and maintain responsible accounting practices and procedures, (iii) maintain effective control over the financial practices of licensees, including establishing minimum procedures for internal fiscal affairs and the safeguarding of assets and revenues, providing reliable recordkeeping and requiring the filing of periodic reports with the Nevada Gaming Authorities, (iv) prevent cheating and fraudulent practices and (v) provide a source of state and local revenues through taxation and licensing fees. Changes in such laws, regulations and procedures could have an adverse effect on the Company's gaming operations.

        Resorts, which operates the Eldorado, is licensed by the Nevada Gaming Authorities and is a corporate licensee (a "Corporate Licensee") under the terms of the Nevada Act. The gaming license requires the periodic payment of fees and taxes and is not transferable. Resorts and Capital each are registered by the Nevada Commission as a publicly traded corporation (a "Registered Corporation"). Registered Corporations are required periodically to submit detailed financial and operating reports to the Nevada Commission and furnish any other information that the Nevada Commission may request. No person may become a member of, or receive any percentage of the profits from, the Company without first obtaining licenses and approvals from the Nevada Gaming Authorities. All of the members of Resorts have obtained the licenses and approvals necessary to own their respective interests in the Company. The Company has obtained from the Nevada Gaming Authorities the various registrations, approvals, permits and licenses required in order to engage in gaming activities at the Eldorado.

15



        The Nevada Gaming Authorities may investigate any individual who has a material relationship to, or material involvement with, the Company in order to determine whether such individual is suitable or should be licensed as a business associate of the Company. Officers, directors and certain key employees of the Company must file applications with the Nevada Gaming Authorities and may be required to be licensed or found suitable by the Nevada Gaming Authorities. The Nevada Gaming Authorities may deny an application for licensing for any cause which they deem reasonable. A finding of suitability is comparable to licensing, and both require submission of detailed personal and financial information followed by a thorough investigation. The applicant for licensing or a finding of suitability must pay all the costs of the investigation. Changes in licensed positions must be reported to the Nevada Gaming Authorities and, in addition to their authority to deny an application for a finding of suitability or licensure, the Nevada Gaming Authorities have jurisdiction to disapprove a change in a corporate position.

        If the Nevada Gaming Authorities were to find an officer, director or key employee of the Company unsuitable for licensing or unsuitable to continue having a relationship with the Company, the Company would have to sever all relationships with such person. In addition, the Nevada Commission may require the Company to terminate the employment of any person who refuses to file appropriate applications. Determinations of suitability or of questions pertaining to licensing are not subject to judicial review in Nevada.

        The Company is required to submit detailed financial and operating reports to the Nevada Commission. Substantially all material loans, leases, sales of securities and similar financing transactions by the Company must be reported to, or approved by, the Nevada Commission.

        If it were determined that the Nevada Act was violated by the Company, the gaming licenses it holds could be limited, conditioned, suspended or revoked, subject to compliance with certain statutory and regulatory procedures. In addition, the Company and the persons involved could be subject to substantial fines for each separate violation of the Nevada Act at the discretion of the Nevada Commission. Further, a supervisor could be appointed by the Nevada Commission to operate the Company's gaming properties and, under certain circumstances, earnings generated during the supervisor's appointment (except for the reasonable rental value of the Company's gaming properties) could be forfeited to the State of Nevada. Limitation, conditioning or suspension of any gaming license or the appointment of a supervisor could (and revocation of any gaming license would) materially adversely affect the Company's gaming operations.

        The Nevada Commission may, in its discretion, require the holder of any debt security of the Company, including the 101/2% Senior Subordinated Notes due 2006 of Resorts and Capital, to file applications, be investigated and be found suitable to own such debt security. If the Nevada Commission determines that a person is unsuitable to own such security, then pursuant to the Nevada Act, the Company can be sanctioned, including the loss of its licenses, if without the prior approval of the Nevada Commission, it: (i) pays to the unsuitable person any dividend, interest or any distribution whatsoever, (ii) recognizes any voting right by such unsuitable person in connection with such securities, (iii) pays the unsuitable person remuneration in any form or (iv) makes any payment to the unsuitable person by way of principal, redemption, conversion, exchange, liquidation or similar transaction.

        Any beneficial holder of a Registered Corporation's voting securities, regardless of the number of shares owned, may be required to file an application, be investigated and have his suitability as a beneficial holder of a Registered Corporation's voting securities determined if the Nevada Commission has reason to believe that such ownership would otherwise be inconsistent with the declared policies of the State of Nevada. The applicant must pay all costs of investigation incurred by the Nevada Gaming Authorities in conducting any such investigation.

16



        The Nevada Act requires any person who acquires beneficial ownership of more than 5% of a Registered Corporation's voting securities to report the acquisition to the Nevada Commission. The Nevada Act requires that beneficial owners of more than 10% of a Registered Corporation's voting securities apply to the Nevada Commission for a finding of suitability within 30 days after the Chairman of the Nevada Gaming Board mails the written notice requiring such filing. Under certain circumstances, an "institutional investor," as defined in the Nevada Act, which acquires more than 10%, but not more than 15%, of a Registered Corporation's voting securities may apply to the Nevada Commission for a waiver of such finding of suitability if such institutional investor holds the voting securities for investment purposes only. An institutional investor will not be deemed to hold voting securities for investment purposes unless the voting securities were acquired and are held in the ordinary course of business as an institutional investor and not for the purpose of causing, directly or indirectly, the election of a majority of the members of the board of directors of a Registered Corporation, any change in a Registered Corporation's corporate charter, bylaws, management, policies or operations or any of its gaming affiliates or any other action which the Nevada Commission finds to be inconsistent with holding the Registered Corporation's voting securities for investment purposes only. Activities which are not deemed to be inconsistent with holding voting securities for investment purposes only include: (i) voting on all matters voted on by shareholders, (ii) making financial and other inquiries of management of the type normally made by securities analysts for informational purposes and not to cause a change in management, policies or operations, and (iii) such other activities as the Nevada Commission may determine to be consistent with such investment intent. If the beneficial holder of voting securities who must be found suitable is a corporation, partnership or trust, it must submit detailed business and financial information including a list of beneficial owners. The applicant is required to pay all costs of investigation.

        Any person who fails or refuses to apply for a finding of suitability or a license within 30 days after being ordered to do so by the Nevada Commission or the Chairman of the Nevada Board may be found unsuitable. The same restrictions apply to a record owner of the Company's securities if the record owner, after request, fails to identify the beneficial owner of such securities. Any shareholder found unsuitable and who holds, directly or indirectly, any beneficial ownership of the voting securities of a Registered Corporation beyond such period of time as may be prescribed by the Nevada Commission may be guilty of a criminal offense. A Registered Corporation is subject to disciplinary action if, after it receives notice that a person is unsuitable to be a member of or to have any other relationship with such corporation, the Registered Corporation (i) pays that person any dividend or interest upon voting securities of such corporation, (ii) allows that person to exercise, directly or indirectly, any voting right conferred through securities held by that person, (iii) pays remuneration in any form to that person for services rendered or otherwise or (iv) fails to pursue all lawful efforts to require such unsuitable person to relinquish his voting securities, including, if necessary, the immediate purchase of such voting securities for cash at fair market value.

        A Registered Corporation is required to maintain a current stock ledger in Nevada which may be examined by the Nevada Gaming Authorities at any time. If any securities are held in trust by an agent or by a nominee, the record holder may be required to disclose the identity of the beneficial owner to the Nevada Gaming Authorities. A failure to make such disclosure may be grounds for finding the record holder unsuitable. A Registered Corporation is also required to render maximum assistance in determining the identity of the beneficial owner. The Nevada Commission has the power to require the stock certificates of a Registered Corporation to bear a legend indicating that the securities are subject to the Nevada Act.

        Neither the Company nor a Registered Corporation may make a public offering of its securities without the prior approval of the Nevada Commission if the securities or proceeds therefrom are intended to be used to construct, acquire or finance gaming facilities in Nevada or to retire or extend obligations incurred for such purposes. Such approval, if given, does not constitute a finding,

17



recommendation or approval by the Nevada Commission or the Nevada Board as to the accuracy or adequacy of the prospectus or the investment merits of the securities. Any representation to the contrary is unlawful.

        Changes in control of a Registered Corporation through merger, consolidation, stock or asset acquisitions, management or consulting agreements or any act or conduct by a person whereby he obtains control may not occur without the prior approval of the Nevada Commission. Entities seeking to acquire control of a Registered Corporation must satisfy the Nevada Board and Nevada Commission with respect to a variety of stringent standards prior to assuming control of such Registered Corporation. The Nevada Commission may also require controlling shareholders, officers, directors and other persons having a material relationship or involvement with the entity proposing to acquire control to be investigated and licensed as a part of the approval process relating to the transaction.

        The Nevada legislature has declared that some corporate acquisitions opposed by management, repurchases of voting securities and corporate defense tactics affecting Registered Corporations may be injurious to stable and productive corporate gaming. The Nevada Commission has established a regulatory scheme to ameliorate the potentially adverse effects of these business practices upon Nevada's gaming industry and to further Nevada's policy to: (i) assure the financial stability of corporate gaming operators and their affiliates, (ii) preserve the beneficial aspects of conducting business in the corporate form and (iii) promote a neutral environment for the orderly governance of corporate affairs. Approvals are required in certain circumstances from the Nevada Commission before a Registered Corporation may make exceptional repurchases of voting securities above the current market price thereof and before a corporate acquisition opposed by management may be consummated. The Nevada Act also requires prior approval of a plan of recapitalization proposed by a Registered Corporation's Board of Directors in response to a tender offer made directly to the Registered Corporation's shareholders for the purposes of acquiring control of the Registered Corporation.

        License fees and taxes, computed in various ways depending on the type of gaming or activity involved, are payable to the State of Nevada and to the counties and cities in which the Nevada licensee's respective operations are conducted. Depending upon the particular fee or tax involved, these fees and taxes are payable either monthly, quarterly or annually and are based upon either: (i) a percentage of the gross revenues received, (ii) the number of gaming devices operated or (iii) the number of table games operated. A casino entertainment tax is also paid by casino operations where certain types of entertainment isare furnished in connection with the selling of food or refreshments.

        Any person who is licensed, required to be licensed, registered, required to be registered or is under common control with such person (collectively, "Licensees"), and who proposes to become involved in a gaming venture outside of Nevada, is required to deposit with the Nevada Gaming Board, and thereafter maintain, a revolving fund in the amount of $10,000 to pay the expenses of investigation by the Nevada Board of their participation in such foreign gaming. The revolving fund is subject to increase or decrease at the discretion of the Nevada Commission. Thereafter, Licensees are required to comply with certain reporting requirements imposed by the Nevada Act. Licensees are also subject to disciplinary action by the Nevada Commission if they knowingly violate any laws of the foreign jurisdiction pertaining to the foreign gaming operation, fail to conduct the foreign gaming operation in accordance with the standards of honesty and integrity required of Nevada gaming operations, engage in activities that are harmful to the State of Nevada or its ability to collect gaming taxes and fees or employ a person in the foreign operation who has been denied a license or finding of suitability in Nevada for the reason of personal unsuitability.

18



Internal Revenue Service Regulations

        The Internal Revenue Service requires operators of casinos located in the United States to file information returns for U.S. citizens, including names and addresses of winners, for keno, bingo and slot machine winnings in excess of stipulated amounts. The Internal Revenue Service also requires operators to withhold taxes on some keno, bingo and slot machine winnings of nonresident aliens. We are unable to predict the extent, to which these requirements, if extended, might impede or otherwise adversely affect operations of, and/or income from, the other games.

        Regulations adopted by the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network of the Treasury Department and the Nevada gaming regulatory authorities require the reporting of currency transactions in excess of $10,000 occurring within a gaming day, including identification of the patron by name and social security number. This reporting obligation began in May 1985 and may have resulted in the loss of gaming revenues to jurisdictions outside the United States which are exempt from the ambit of these regulations.

Other Laws and Regulations

        The sale of alcoholic beverages at the Eldorado isand the Silver Legacy are subject to licensing, control and regulation by applicable local regulatory agencies. All licenses are revocable and are not transferable. The agencies involved have full power to limit, condition, suspend or revoke any license, and any disciplinary action could, and revocation would, have a material adverse effect upon our operations.

        The Eldorado and the Silver Legacy are subject to extensive state and local regulations and, on a periodic basis, must obtain various licenses and permits, including those required to sell alcoholic beverages. The Company believes that it has obtained all required licenses and permits and that our business is conducted in substantial compliance with applicable laws.

Environmental Matters

        As is the case with any owner or operator of real property, the Company is subject to a variety of federal, state and local governmental regulations relating to the use, storage, discharge, emission and disposal of hazardous materials. Federal, state and local environmental laws and regulations also impose liability on potentially responsible parties, including the owners or operators of real property, to clean up, or contribute to the cost of cleaning up, sites at which hazardous wastes or materials were disposed of or released. The Company does not have environmental liability insurance to cover such events.

        Certain of the Company's properties and former properties, including the Silver Legacy property, had or have varying degrees of petroleum contamination in the soil and/or groundwater. In each instance where such petroleum contamination has been identified, investigation or remediation activities have been undertaken or are ongoing. The possibility exists that additional contamination, as yet unknown, may exist at these or other of the Company's properties. In addition, under the terms of an Environmental Indemnity, dated May 30, 1995 (the "Environmental Indemnity"), the Company agreed jointly and severally with Mandalay to indemnify, defend and hold harmless the agents and lenders under a bank credit facility of the Silver Legacy Joint Venture which was paid in full on March 5, 2002 from and against any and all Environmental Losses (as defined in the Environmental Indemnity) suffered or incurred on the premises of the Silver Legacy or arising through the ownership, use, occupancy or operation thereof. Generally, liability under the Environmental Indemnity covers the period prior to the date the lenders foreclose on and take possession of the real property securing their loans to the Silver Legacy Joint Venture. The agents and lenders are not required to seek payments from the Silver Legacy Joint Venture before pursuing payments from the Company and Mandalay for Environmental Losses. In all cases, the Company believes that the contamination arose from activities

19



of prior owners or occupants, or from offsite sources and not as a result of any actions or operations conducted by the Company.

        In 1998 the Silver Legacy received reimbursement and indemnification from Chevron Company USA of $750,000 for petroleum contamination identified on the Silver Legacy property. The possibility exists that other responsible parties may be identified for this or other sites, and the Company will determine whether to seek contribution or reimbursement from such parties. In addition, reimbursement for some of the expenditures has been, and further reimbursement may be, obtained from the State of Nevada Petroleum Fund which has been established to reimburse parties for costs incurred in clean-up of underground storage tank related contamination.

        The Company's properties and former propertiesGroundwater in the vicinity of the Eldorado property is also lie withincontaminated by a chlorinated solvent known as perchloroethylene or "PCE." This contaminant is widespread in the proposedReno/Sparks area. The Central Truckee Meadows Remediation District, encompassing much of the Citycities of Reno which willand Sparks, was established pursuant to state legislation to address groundwater contaminated with solvents as identifiedthis contamination. The Central Truckee Meadows Remediation District is managed by Washoe County under the direction of the Nevada Division of Environmental Protection.Protection, and is currently conducting investigations and developing a remediation plan. Funding for the Central Truckee Meadows Remediation District is provided through assessments to water customers which are calculated on the basis of water use. The annual assessment to the Company doesis currently $178, plus an additional sum based on the amount of water used, which in our most recent annual assessment amounted to approximately $18,000. It is possible that additional assessments may be made against properties that receive special benefits from the Central Truckee Meadows Remediation District, such as clean-up of contamination affecting a specific parcel. The legislation implementing this program exempts property owners who did not cause or contribute to the contamination from civil and criminal liability for the cost of remediation and any related damages, except to the extent of unpaid assessments. We do not believe that it haswe have contributed to this solvent contamination. The Company has not beencontamination, however, we expect that we will be required to conduct any remediation orallow the Central Truckee Meadows Remediation District access to our property for continued investigation, of this matter norincluding access to contribute toward any costs associated therewith. However, the possibility remains that funding of the investigation or remediation of this regional groundwater issue could result in a special assessment on the Company's properties or former properties among others within the Remediation District. The possibility exists that the entire area of contamination, or a portion thereof, could be listed under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act of 1980.monitoring wells.

        Asbestos has been determined to be present in the sheetrock of approximately 400 of the Eldorado's older hotel rooms. Removal of the asbestos will be required only in the event of the demolition of the affected rooms or if the asbestos is otherwise disturbed. Management currently has no plans to renovate or demolish the affected rooms in a manner that would require removal of the asbestos at this time.

        The possibility exists that additional contamination, as yet unknown, may exist at the Eldorado or Silver Legacy. In all cases, however, the Company believes that any such contamination would have arisen from activities of prior owners or occupants, or from offsite sources and not as a result of any of our actions or operations. The Company does not believe that our expenditures for environmental investigations or remediation will have a material adverse effect on our financial condition or results of operations.

        The Company has expended approximately $740,000$743,000 in connection with environmental matters from January 1, 1993 through December 31, 2002,2003, of which approximately $2,830 was expended during 2003 and approximately $1,990 was expended during 2002 and approximately $225 was expended in 2001.2002.

Employees

        As of December 31, 2002,2003, the Company had 2,1101,914 employees, the substantial majority of whom are nonmanagement personnel. The number of people employed at any time is subject to seasonal fluctuation. None of the Company's employees are covered by a collective bargaining agreement. The Company believes that employee relations are excellent.

20



Factors that May Affect the Company's Future Results

(Cautionary Statements Under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995)

        Certain information included in this report and other materials filed or to be filed by the Company with the Securities and Exchange Commission (as well as information included in oral statements or other written statements made or to be made by the Company) contains or may contain forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. These statements can be identified by

20



the fact that they do not relate strictly to historical or current facts. The Company has based these forward-looking statements on its current expectations about future events. These forward-looking statements include statements with respect to the Company's beliefs, plans, objectives, goals, expectations, anticipations, intentions, financial condition, results of operations, future performance and business, including:


        Such statements include information relating to capital spending, financing sources and the effects of regulation (including gaming and tax regulation) and competition. From time to time, oral or written forward-looking statements are also included in the Company's periodic reports on Forms 10-Q and 8-K, press releases and other materials released to the public.

        Any or all of the forward-looking statements in this report and in any other public statements the Company makes may turn out to be wrong. This can occur as a result of inaccurate assumptions or as a consequence of known or unknown risks and uncertainties. Many factors discussed in this report, such as government regulation and the competitive environment, will be important in determining the Company's future performance. Consequently, actual results may differ materially from those that might be anticipated from forward-looking statements.

        The Company undertakes no obligation to publicly update any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise. However, any further disclosures made on related subjects in the Company's subsequent reports on Forms 10-K, 10-Q and 8-K should be consulted. The following discussion of risks, uncertainties and possible inaccurate assumptions relevant to the Company's business includes factors the Company believes could cause its actual results to differ materially from expected and historical results. Other factors beyond those listed below could also adversely affect the Company. This discussion is provided as permitted by the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995.

21


21



Item 2.    Properties.

        The Company's executive offices are located inside the Eldorado, which is situated on an approximately 159,000 square foot parcel at 345 North Virginia Street, Reno, Nevada. The CompanyResorts owns the entire parcel, except for approximately 30,000 square feet which is leased by the Company from C, S and Y Associates, a general partnership of which Donald Carano is a general partner. See "Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation" in Item 11 of this report. The lease expires on June 30, 2027. Annual rent is equal to the greater of (i) $400,000 and (ii) an amount based on a decreasing percentage of the Eldorado's gross gaming revenues ranging from 3.0% of the first $6.5 million of gross gaming revenues to 0.1% of gross gaming revenues in excess of $75.0 million. Rent in 20022003 totaled

22



approximately $638,000.$629,000. Substantially, all of the Company's real property, including the Eldorado, is subject to encumbrances securing the repayment of the Company's revolving credit facility (the "New Credit Facility"). The New Credit Facility provided forprovides a revolving credit facility of $40.0$30.0 million as of December 31, 2002 and, by its terms, the facility reduces by $1.6$1.0 million on MarchDecember 31, 20032004 and the end of each subsequent quarter until March 31, 2006, when the facility

22



terminates and any balance then outstanding becomes due and payable. At December 31, 2002,2003, the indebtedness outstanding under the New Credit Facility was $1.0$13.0 million. At that date the Company also had pledged a letter of credit in the amount of $685,000 which reduced the credit available under the New Credit Facility by the amount of the pledged letter of credit. The New Credit Facility is secured by a first deed of trust and security interest in all real property interests and fixtures underlying the Eldorado, certain parking facilities, a second deed of trust on the 31,000 square foot property referred to below, all related personal property, substantially all other assets of the Company and a pledge of the Company's interest in ELLC. In addition, Capital has guaranteed Resorts' obligations under the New Credit Facility.

        The Company owns approximately 90 acres of land located in Verdi, Nevada (the "Verdi Land"). The New Credit Facility is secured by a first deed of trust and security interest in all real property interests and fixtures relating to the Verdi Land.

        The Company owns a 31,000 square foot parcel of property across the street from and west of the Eldorado, which could be used for expansion of the Eldorado. As of December 31, 2002,2003, this property was subject to an encumbrance securing the repayment of indebtedness of $1,293,000$981,500 in addition to the aforementioned second deed of trust securing the Company's indebtedness under the New Credit Facility.

        The Company and Mandalay each owns a one-half interest in a 63,000 square foot parcel of land across the street from the Silver Legacy. As of December 31, 2002,2003, this property was not subject to any encumbrances.encumbrance securing the repayment of indebtedness.

        The Company's 96% owned subsidiary, ELLC, owns a 50% joint venture interest in the Silver Legacy, a major themed hotel/casino located adjacent to the Eldorado. Reference is made to the information appearing under the headings "Silver Legacy Resort Casino" and "Silver Legacy Joint Venture-Background" in Item 1 of this report, which information is hereby incorporated in this Item 2 by this reference. At December 31, 2002,2003, the Silver Legacy was subject to encumbrances securing repayment of indebtedness in the aggregate principal amount of $169.0$160.0 million.


Item 3.    Legal Proceedings.

        The Company from time to time is involved in litigation arising in the ordinary course of its business. The Company does not believe that such litigation to which the Company or any subsidiary of the Company is a party or of which any of their property is the subject will, individually or in the aggregate, have a material adverse effect on the Company's financial position or the results of its operations.


Item 4.    Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders.

        Not applicable.

23



PART II

Item 5.    Market for Registrants' Common Equity and Related Stockholder Matters.Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities.

        There is no established public trading market for (i) Resorts' outstanding membership interests, which were owned of record by three entities, two individuals and various trusts for the benefit of members of the Carano family as of December 31, 2002,2003, or (ii) the common stock of Capital, which is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Resorts. See Item 12 of this report for additional information concerning the ownership of Resorts' membership interests. As a limited liability company, Resorts is not (and its predecessor, the Predecessor Partnership, was not) subject to Federal income tax liability. Because the Company's holders of membership interests in Resorts are (and the Predecessor Partnership's partners were) required to include their respective shares of Resorts or the Predecessor Partnership'sResorts' taxable income

23



in their individual income tax returns, Resorts and the Predecessor Partnership havehas made distributions to theirits members and partners to cover such tax liabilities. Distributions for 20022003 were, and distributions for subsequent years will be, limited in accordance with the provisions of the Operating Agreement of Eldorado Resorts LLC dated as of June 28, 1996 (the "Operating Agreement"). The Operating Agreement provides that the Board of Managers will distribute each year to each member an amount equal to such member's allocable share of taxable income multiplied by the highest marginal combined Federal, state, and local income tax rate applicable to individuals for that year; provided that such distributions will not be made after any event that causes Resorts to thereafter be taxed under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, as a corporation. Distributions by Resorts has made distributions to its members aggregatedaggregating $2.5 million and $4.6 million in 2003 and $6.0 million for 2002, and 2001, respectively, all of which was for income taxes. We do not anticipate making any additional distributions for income earned through December 31, 2003.

        ReferencesDuring the fiscal quarter ended December 31, 2003, neither Resorts nor Capital issued any equity securities and, during such period, neither Resorts nor Capital, nor any "affiliated purchaser" (as defined in Rule 10b-18(a)(3) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) purchased any of the equity securities of Resorts or Capital.

        Reference is made to the information appearing under the caption "Equity Compensation Plans" in Item 12 of this report, which is incorporated in this Item 5 by this reference.

24



Item 6.    Selected Financial Data.

SELECTED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL DATA
(dollars in thousands)



 Years Ended December 31,
 
 Years Ended December 31,
 


 2002
 2001
 2000
 1999
 1998
 
 2003
 2002
 2001
 2000
 1999
 
Consolidated Statement of Income Data:Consolidated Statement of Income Data:            Consolidated Statement of Income Data:                

Operating revenues:

Operating revenues:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
Operating revenues:                
Casino $94,355 $97,726 $113,613 $112,967 $104,441 Casino $86,972 $94,355 $97,726 $113,613 $112,967 
Food, beverage and entertainment  44,603 46,428 50,806 48,125 44,330 Food, beverage and entertainment  42,195  44,603  46,428  50,806  48,125 
Hotel  16,372 17,427 18,005 17,824 18,142 Hotel  16,499  16,372  17,427  18,005  17,824 
Other  5,398 5,334 5,508 5,959 6,698 Other  5,525  5,398  5,334  5,508  5,959 
 
 
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
 
 
  160,728 166,915 187,932 184,875 173,611    151,191  160,728  166,915  187,932  184,875 
Less promotional allowances  (17,866) (17,592) (17,612) (16,483) (15,296)Less promotional allowances  (18,234) (17,866) (17,592) (17,612) (16,483)
 
 
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
 
 
 Net operating revenues  142,862 149,323 170,320 168,392 158,315  Net operating revenues  132,957  142,862  149,323  170,320  168,392 
 
 
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
 
 
Operating expenses:Operating expenses:            Operating expenses:                
Casino  49,032 50,172 53,112 51,153 47,575 Casino  47,400  49,032  50,172  53,112  51,153 
Food, beverage and entertainment  31,077 32,040 34,791 33,236 33,017 Food, beverage and entertainment  28,750  31,077  32,040  34,791  33,236 
Hotel  6,839 7,465 8,005 7,412 7,611 Hotel  6,809  6,839  7,465  8,005  7,412 
Other  2,091 1,928 3,151 4,013 3,881 Other  1,522  2,091  1,928  3,151  4,013 
Selling, general and administrative(2)  27,704 29,079 32,139 31,103 29,745 Selling, general and administrative(2)  27,051  27,704  29,079  32,139  31,103 
Depreciation  11,798 12,957 13,439 13,652 13,718 Depreciation  11,219  11,798  12,957  13,439  13,652 
 
 
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
 
 
 Total operating expenses  128,541 133,641 144,637 140,569 135,547  Total operating expenses  122,751  128,541  133,641  144,637  140,569 
 
 
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
 
 
Equity in income of unconsolidated affiliates(1)Equity in income of unconsolidated affiliates(1)  8,967 10,412 11,935 2,881  Equity in income of unconsolidated affiliates(1)  5,613  8,967  10,412  11,935  2,881 
 
 
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
 
 
Operating income  23,288 26,094 37,618 30,704 22,768 Operating income  15,819  23,288  26,094  37,618  30,704 
 
 
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
 
 
Other income (expense):Other income (expense):            Other income (expense):                
Equity in loss of unconsolidated affiliate(3)  (355) (207)    Equity in loss of unconsolidated affiliate(3).  (511) (355) (207)    
Interest rate swap income  1,076     Interest rate swap income (loss)  (163) 1,076       
Gain (Loss) on investments   (225) 60 2,327  Gain (Loss) on bond repurchases  (578) 50  343     
Interest expense, net.  (10,204) (11,810) (13,016) (12,153) (13,151)Gain on sale of land  906         
 
 
 
 
 
 Gain (Loss) on investments      (225) 60  2,327 
 Total other income (expense)  (9,483) (12,242) (12,956) (9,826) (13,151)Interest expense, net.  (8,706) (10,254) (12,153) (13,016) (12,153)
 
 
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
 
 
Income before minority interest  13,805 13,852 24,662 20,878 9,617  Total other income (expense)  (9,052) (9,483) (12,242) (12,956) (9,826)
Minority interest(4)  (319) (403) (455) (110)    
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Income before minority interest.  6,767  13,805  13,852  24,662  20,878 
Net income(5) $13,486 $13,449 $24,207 $20,768 $9,617 Minority interest(4).  (181) (319) (403) (455) (110)
 
 
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
 
 
Net income(5) $6,586 $13,486 $13,449 $24,207 $20,768 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Other Data:Other Data:            Other Data:                
Net cash provided by (used in):Net cash provided by (used in):            Net cash provided by (used in):                
Operating activities $17,571 $15,979 $27,667 $35,057 $23,122 Operating activities $13,644 $17,605 $15,843 $27,667 $35,057 
Investing activities  13,398 (5,795) (7,248) (8,633) (5,484)Investing activities  (4,718) 13,314  (6,002) (7,248) (8,633)
Financing activities  (32,744) (9,641) (20,057) (25,506) (15,920)Financing activities  (9,699) (32,694) (9,298) (20,057) (25,506)
Capital expendituresCapital expenditures  4,861 6,364 7,763 7,830 5,665 Capital expenditures  9,917  4,861  6,364  7,763  7,830 

Operating Data(6):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
Number of hotel rooms(7)  816 816 816 816 816 
Average hotel occupancy rate(7)  89.0% 89.6% 91.7% 91.9% 92.8%
Casino square footage(7)  84,000 84,000 84,000 84,000 84,000 
Number of slot machines(7)  1,752 1,826 1,947 1,880 1,871 
Number of table games(7)  70 78 78 78 79 
Ratio of earnings to fixed charges(6)Ratio of earnings to fixed charges(6)  1.7x  2.3x  2.1x  2.8x  2.7x 
Operating Data(7):Operating Data(7):                
Number of hotel rooms(8)Number of hotel rooms(8)  816  816  816  816  816 
Average hotel occupancy rate(8)Average hotel occupancy rate(8)  88.7% 89.0% 89.6% 91.7% 91.9%
Casino square footage(8)Casino square footage(8)  84,000  84,000  84,000  84,000  84,000 
Number of slot machines(8)Number of slot machines(8)  1,587  1,752  1,826  1,947  1,880 
Number of table games(8)Number of table games(8)  63  70  78  78  78 

       


 At December 31,
 At December 31,

 2002
 2001
 2000
 1999
 1998
 2003
 2002
 2001
 2000
 1999
Consolidated Balance Sheet Data:                    
Cash and cash equivalents $8,135 $9,910 $9,367 $9,005 $8,087 $7,362 $8,135 $9,910 $9,367 $9,005
Total assets 217,644 237,461 235,725 231,778 231,258 215,177 217,644 237,461 235,725 231,778
Total debt 85,210 113,482 117,031 128,978 124,884 78,346 85,210 113,482 117,031 128,978
Members' equity (8) 111,095 102,204 94,751 79,777 87,486 115,181 111,095 102,204 94,751 79,777

See footnotes to Selected Consolidated Financial Data which appear on the next page.

25



Footnotes to Selected Consolidated Financial Data

(1)
Equity in income of unconsolidated affiliates represents ELLC's 50% joint venture interest in the Silver Legacy Joint Venture and for the years ended December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001, Resorts' 21.25% interest in Tamarack.

(2)
Resorts pays management fees to Recreational Enterprises, Inc. and Hotel Casino Management, Inc., the owners of 55% and 29% of Resorts' equity interests, respectively. The management fees paid to Recreational Enterprises, Inc. and Hotel Casino Management, Inc. are included in selling, general and administrative expenses and totaled $295,000, $48,000 $1.2 million and $1.8$1.2 million for the years ended December 31, 2003, 2002 2001 and 2000,2001, respectively. Historically, the salaries of senior executive officers and certain other key employees of the Predecessor Partnership were not directly incurred by the Predecessor Partnership but were paid from a portion of the management fees paid to Recreational Enterprises, Inc. As of July 1, 1996, the aggregate annual salaries of such senior executive officers and other key employees became payroll obligations of Resorts. Resorts then entered into a Management Agreement with Recreational Enterprises, Inc. and Hotel Casino Management, Inc. providing that future management fees paid to Recreation Enterprises, Inc. and Hotel Casino Management, Inc. will not exceed 1.5% of Resorts' annual net revenues. As a result of the Management Agreement and Resorts' assumption of responsibility for the salaries of senior executive officers and other key employees previously paid by Recreational Enterprises, Inc. from its management fee, Resorts incurred such salaries and management fees for the years ended December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001 and 2000 of $1.9 million, $1.7 million $3.0 million and $4.0$3.0 million, respectively.

(3)
Equity in loss of unconsolidated affiliate represents Resorts' 19%18% interest in MindPlay.

(4)
Minority interest represents the minority partners' share of ELLC's 50% joint venture interest in the Silver Legacy Joint Venture. The minority interest in ELLC is owned by certain Resorts' equityholders and is approximately 4%.

(5)
As a limited liability company, Resorts is not (and its Predecessor Partnership, was not) subject to Federal income tax liability. Because the Company's holders of membership interests in Resorts are (and the Predecessor Partnership's partners were) required to include their respective shares of Resorts or the Predecessor Partnership'sResorts' taxable income in their individual income tax returns, Resorts and the Predecessor Partnership havehas made distributions to theirits members and partners to cover such liabilities.

(6)
The ratio of earnings to fixed charges has been computed as earnings divided by fixed charges. Earnings represent net income plus fixed charges. Fixed charges represent interest expense, whether expensed or capitalized, the interest component of rent expense and amortization of debt issuance costs.

(7)
Excludes the operating data of the Silver Legacy and Tamarack.

(7)(8)
As of the end of each period presented.

(8)
Effective upon consummation of the Reorganization, partners' equity was reclassified as members' equity.

26



Item 7.    Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.

General

        Eldorado Resorts LLC ("Resorts") was formed in June 1996 to be the successor to Eldorado Hotel Associates Limited Partnership (the "Predecessor Partnership") pursuant to an exchange of all the outstanding partnership interests in the Predecessor Partnership for membership interests in Resorts (the "Reorganization"). The Reorganization was effective on July 1, 1996. Resorts owns and operates the Eldorado Hotel & Casino (the "Eldorado"), a premier hotel/casino and entertainment facility in Reno, Nevada. In addition to owning the Eldorado, Resorts' 96% owned subsidiary, Eldorado Limited Liability Company, a Nevada limited liability company ("ELLC"), owns a 50% interest in a joint venture (the "Silver Legacy Joint Venture") which owns the Silver Legacy Resort Casino (the "Silver Legacy"), a major, themed hotel/casino located adjacent to the Eldorado. Resorts, ELLC and Eldorado Capital Corp. ("Capital"), a wholly-owned subsidiary of Resorts, which holds no significant assets and conducts no business activity, are collectively referred to as the "Company."

        The Company accounts for its investment in the Silver Legacy Joint Venture, Tamarack and MindPlay utilizing the equity method of accounting. MindPlay is currently in the developmental stage. The Company's consolidated net income includes its proportional share of Silver Legacy Joint Venture's, Tamarack's, and MindPlay's net income (loss) before taxes.

Critical Accounting Policies

        Our discussion and analysis of our results of operations and financial condition that follows are based upon our consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. The preparation of these financial statements requires that we apply significant judgment in defining the appropriate assumptions for calculating financial estimates. By their nature, these judgments are subject to an inherent degree of uncertainty. Our judgments are based on our historical experience, terms of existing contracts, our observance of trends in the industry, information provided by our customers and information available from other outside sources, as appropriate. Because of the uncertainty inherent in these matters, there is no assurance that actual results will not differ from our estimates used in applying the following critical accounting policies.

Property and Equipment and Other Long-Lived Assets

        Property and equipment is recorded at cost and is depreciated over its estimated useful life. Judgments are made in determining estimated useful lives and salvage values of these assets. The accuracy of these estimates affects the amount of depreciation expense recognized in our financial results and whether we have a gain or loss on the disposal of assets. We review depreciation estimates and methods as new events occur, more experience is acquired, and additional information is obtained that would possibly change our current estimates. In accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 144, "Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets", long-lived assets are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. An estimate of undiscounted future cash flows produced by the asset is compared to its carrying value to determine whether an impairment exists. If it is determined that the asset is impaired based on expected future cash flows, a loss, measured by the amount by which the carrying amount of the asset exceeds the fair value of the asset, would be recognized. At December 31, 2002,2003, no events or changes in circumstances indicated that the carrying values of our long-lived assets may not be recoverable.

27



Reserve for Uncollectible Accounts Receivable

        We reserve an estimated amount for receivables that may not be collected. Methodologies for estimating bad debt reserves range from specific reserves to various percentages applied to aged receivables. Historical collection rates are considered, as are customer relationships, in determining specific reserves. As with many estimates, management must make judgments about potential actions by third parties in establishing and evaluating our reserves for bad debts.

27



Self Insurance Reserves

        The Eldorado is self insured for our group health and workmens' compensation programs. We utilize historical claims information provided by our third party administrators to make estimates for known pending claims as well as claims that have been incurred, but not reported as of the balance sheet date. In order to mitigate our potential exposure, we have an individual claim stop loss policy on our group health claims and an aggregate stop loss policy on our workmens' compensation claims. If we become aware of significant claims or material changes affecting our estimates, we would increase our reserves in the period in which we made such a determination and record the additional expense.

Recent DevelopmentsFactors Impacting Operating Trends

        A significant portion of the Company's revenues and operating income are generated from patrons who are residents of northern California, and as such, our operations have been adversely impacted by the growth in Native American gaming in northern California that has occurred to date. In addition to the existing gaming facilities, numerous Native American tribes have announced that they are in the process of developing or are considering establishing large-scale hotel and gaming facilities in northern California. The United Auburn Indian Community ("UAIC") has entered into a development and management agreement with an established gaming operator, Station Casinos, Inc., to develop and manage aThunder Valley Casino, an approximately $215 million, 200,000 square foot gaming and entertainment facility on a 49-acre site approximately 21 miles northeast of Sacramento. On September 17, 2002, the United States Department of Interior accepted the 49-acre site into trust for the UAIC,Thunder Valley Casino opened on June 9, 2003 and Station Casinos, Inc. announced anoffers approximately $215 million, 200,000 square foot gaming1,906 slot machines and 111 table games, dining and entertainment facility which is anticipated toamenities and parking for 4,500 vehicles. This project has been open in June or July 2003.approximately eight months, and during the third and fourth quarter of 2003, we believe it had a significant impact on our operating results. Based on its size, proximity, and proximity,potential expansion capabilities, we believe the opening of this new facility willThunder Valley Casino could further impact our operations.operations in the future. While we cannot predict the extent of the potentialfuture impact, it could be significant. In addition to existing gaming facilities, numerous Native American tribes have announced that they are in the process of developing or are considering establishing large-scale gaming facilities in northern California. Management believes the greatest impact from Thunder Valley Casino to the Eldorado's customer base is to its day-trippers, those patrons whose visit is for one day and does not include an overnight stay. These customers are typically not tracked players, as they tend not to be as loyal a customer as those who visit for more than one day at a time. Day-trippers primarily visit Reno in the second and third quarters when the weather is more favorable.

        Approvals have been obtained for two public works projects in the downtown area of Reno. The first project will lower the train tracks which run between Reno's downtown district and separate the Eldorado and the two adjoining properties from the rest of the downtown gaming facilities. Construction on this project, which commenced in early 2003, is expected to be completed in 2006 and will be organized in such a manner that it will not prevent pedestrian or vehicular traffic from crossing the railroad tracks within the downtown area.2006. The second project involves the construction of a downtown special events center next to the National Bowling Stadium. ThisConstruction of this project commenced in January 2004 and is expected to be finished in 2005. At this time,completed by December 2004. While we believe the construction of these projects has had a minimal impact on our operations, we cannot determine their impact during their remaining periods of construction or after their completion.

        On July 22, 2003, the effectGovernor of these projectsNevada signed into law a new tax bill that provides for increases in the taxes applicable to our operations. Based on our evaluation of the new Nevada tax law,

28



we believe the annual incremental impact on our current level of operations particularly during their construction periods.will be approximately $0.75 million.

        Our operating results are highly dependent on the volume of customers visiting and staying at our resort. Key volume indicators include table games drop and slot handle, which refer to amounts wagered by our customers. The amount of volume we retain, which is not fully controllable by us, is recognized as casino revenues and is refered to as our win or hold. In addition, hotel occupancy and price per room designated by average daily rate ("ADR") are key indicators for our hotel business.

        The following discussion of the Company's operations relates to the Eldorado except as otherwise indicated.

Year Ended December 31, 2003 Compared to
Year Ended December 31, 2002

Net Revenues

        Net revenues decreased by approximately $9.9 million, or 6.9%, to $133.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2003 compared to $142.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2002. The decrease in net revenues resulted from decreases in casino, food and entertainment revenues. The Company's management believes that revenues have been negatively impacted due to increased competition from Native American casinos in northern California, particularly due to the opening of Thunder Valley Casino on June 9, 2003, and a weak California economy continued to pose a challenge in 2003. Management also feels that with its new slot product on the remodeled casino floor, along with our enhanced complimentary program and remodeled hotel rooms, revenues will stabilize, particularly in the casino, as we continue to maintain our loyal customer base while we aggressively target and attract local customers.

        Casino revenues decreased by 7.8% to $87.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2003, compared to $94.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2002. The decrease in casino revenues was due to decreases in table games drop and slot handle, primarily in untracked play in the second half of 2003, and a lower table games hold percentage for the year ended December 31, 2003 as compared to 2002. This decrease in hold percentage, as compared to 2002, accounted for 31.8% of the decrease in casino revenues.

        Food, beverage and entertainment revenues decreased by approximately $2.4 million, or 5.4%, to $42.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2003 compared to $44.6 million in 2002. The decrease was primarily due to lower showroom occupancy and lower restaurant customer counts in the 2003 period.

        Hotel revenues increased to $16.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2003 from $16.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2002, an increase of approximately 0.8%. This increase is primarily a result of an increase in the Company's average daily rate ("ADR") to approximately $57 for the year ended December 31, 2003 compared to approximately $56 for the same period in 2002. The hotel occupancy was comparable at approximately 89% for the years ended December 31, 2003 and 2002. In both the 2003 and 2002 periods, hotel occupancy was impacted by a reduction in available room nights (3,400 in 2003 and 3,300 in 2002) due to our hotel remodeling in the first half of 2003 and an energy retrofit in the first half of 2002. Had some of these room nights been available on select weekends, the hotel would have been at capacity on these weekends.

        Other revenues increased slightly to $5.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2003 as compared to $5.4 million in 2002.

        Promotional allowances, expressed as a percentage of casino revenues, were 21.0% in 2003 compared to 18.9% in 2002. This increase is primarily related to increased redemption of

29



complimentaries as a result of our customers utilizing the enhanced "Club Eldorado" program. The Company enhanced its "Club Eldorado" program on July 1, 2002, allowing customers to view and redeem earned complimentaries throughout the property and offering discounts at the showroom and food outlets. Management feels the enhanced program has contributed to increased customer loyalty and has added to its customer base.

Operating Expenses

        The Company's operating expenses decreased by 4.5% to $122.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2003 from $128.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2002. This decrease is mainly attributable to decreased casino, food, beverage, entertainment, selling, general and administrative expenses. The decrease in operating expenses reflects efficiencies in operations as management is continually monitoring departmental expenses.

        Casino expenses decreased by 3.3% to $47.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2003 from $49.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2002. The decrease is due to reductions in our charter bus program and payroll expenditures, primarily in our slot department, where we are benefiting from utilizing new labor efficient ticket-in ticket-out slot machines. The ticket-in ticket-out machines were first introduced in early 2003 and as of December 31, 2003, we had approximately 512 of these machines, or approximately 32% of the total machines in use at the Eldorado.

        Food, beverage and entertainment expenses decreased by approximately $2.3 million, or 7.5%, to $28.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2003 from $31.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2002. The decrease is mainly due to lower payroll expenditures and decreased food costs, primarily due to lower restaurant customer counts, lower showroom professional services and advertising expenses.

        Hotel expenses for the year ended December 31, 2003 and 2002 remained flat at $6.8 million.

        Selling, general and administrative expenses and management fees decreased by 2.4% to $27.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2003 from $27.7 million during 2002. The decrease was primarily due to decreases in payroll expenditures and advertising expenses and not recording an initial players club liability in the 2003 period, partially offset by an increase in management fees and general liability insurance.

Depreciation

        Depreciation decreased to $11.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2003 compared to $11.8 million in 2002, a decrease of $0.6 million, or 4.9%, due to some assets becoming fully depreciated.

Equity in Income of Unconsolidated Affiliates

        Earnings from the Company's unconsolidated affiliates, the Silver Legacy Joint Venture and Tamarack, for the year ended December 31, 2003 were $5.6 million as compared to $9.0 million for 2002, a decrease of approximately $3.4 million, or 37.4%. Equity in income of the Silver Legacy Joint Venture decreased approximately $3.6 million for year ended December 31, 2003 compared to 2002. The reasons for this reduction, similar to the Eldorado, are related to increased competition from Native American gaming in northern California and a weak economy. Equity in income in Tamarack increased approximately $0.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2003 compared to 2002.

Other Income (Expense)

        Other income (expense) is comprised of interest expense, equity in loss of unconsolidated affiliate, gain (loss) on repurchase of bonds, investment loss, gain on land sale and interest rate swap income

30



(loss). Interest expense is net of capitalized interest and interest income. For the year ended December 31, 2003, interest expense decreased by approximately $1.5 million, or 15.1%, to $8.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2003 compared to $10.3 million in 2002, primarily due to decreases in the average outstanding borrowings and a lower average interest rate in 2003. The decreases in average outstanding borrowings and lower average interest rate is primarily due to the following purchases and redemption of 101/2% Notes:

Redemption Amount

Month
Year
$2.0 millionJune2002
$5.2 millionAugust2002
$7.9 millionJanuary2003
$1.75 millionSeptember2003
$8.8 millionNovember2003

The Company recognized a cumulative $578,000 loss in 2003 and a cumulative $50,000 gain in 2002 as a result of its purchases and redemption of 101/2% Notes, in each case net of unamortized bond fees relating to the debt issue. The Company recognized a $0.2 million loss in 2003 and a $1.1 million gain in 2002 from interest rate swap agreements. Equity in loss of our unconsolidated affiliate was $0.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2003 compared to a loss of $0.4 million in 2002. The Company did not capitalize any interest for the year ended December 31, 2003 while it capitized interest of approximately $103,000 in 2002. In June 2003, the Company sold its approximately 85 acres of land in Verdi, Nevada, resulting in a gain of $906,000.

Net Income

        As a result of the factors described above, net income for the year ended December 31, 2003 decreased by 51.2% to $6.6 million compared to $13.5 million in 2002.

Year Ended December 31, 2002 Compared to
Year Ended December 31, 2001

Net Revenues

        Net revenues decreased by approximately $6.5 million, or 4.3%, to $142.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2002 compared to $149.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2001. The decrease in net revenues resulted from decreases in casino revenues, food, beverage and entertainment revenues and hotel revenues. The Company's management believes that revenues have been negatively impacted due to increased competition from Native American casinos in northern California and a weak California economy. The absence in 2002 of the American Bowling Congress National Championship, that began in February and ended in June 2001, also negatively impacted our mid-week business levels as compared to the prior year. The Company enhanced its "Club Eldorado" program on July 1, 2002, allowing customers to view earned complimentaries at kiosks throughout the property and offer discounts at the showroom and food outlets. Management feels the enhanced program has

28



provided additional customer loyalty and has added to its customer base. Since implementation, net revenues have remained relatively consistent with the prior year.

        Casino revenues decreased by 3.4% to $94.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2002, compared to $97.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2001. The decrease in casino revenues was primarily due to lower slot revenue as a result of decreased slot volume partially offset by increased table games revenue due to a higher games hold percentage for the year ended December 31, 2002 as compared to 2001.

        Food, beverage and entertainment revenues decreased by approximately $1.8 million, or 3.9%, to $44.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2002 compared to $46.4 million in 2001. The decrease

31



was primarily due to lower showroom occupancy and lower restaurant customer counts in the 2002 period.

        Hotel revenues decreased to $16.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2002 from $17.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2001, a decrease of approximately 6.1%. This decrease iswas attributable to the Eldorado's average daily rate ("ADR") and hotel occupancy decreasing to approximately $56 and 89%, respectively, in the 2002 period as compared to approximately $59 and 90%, respectively, in 2001. The hotel occupancy decrease was partly due to an energy conservation retrofit of our hotel rooms, completed in March 2002, which reduced the number of available room nights in the first quarter by approximately 3,300. Had some of these room nights been available on select weekends, the hotel would have been at capacity on these weekends. Also contributing to the decrease in the Company's hotel occupancy and average daily rate was the absence in 2002 of the American Bowling Congress National Championship Bowling Tournament that was held in 2001 beginning in February and ending in June.

        Other revenues increased slightly to $5.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2002 as compared to $5.3 million in 2001.

        Promotional allowances, expressed as a percentage of casino revenues, were 18.9% in 2002 compared to 18.0% in 2001.

Operating Expenses

        The Company's operating expenses decreased by 3.8% to $128.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2002 from $133.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2001. This decrease iswas mainly attributable to decreased casino, food, beverage, entertainment, hotel and selling, general and administrative expenses. Payroll expenditures were lower for the year ended December 31, 2002, reflecting staff reductions implemented in September 2001 as a result of reduced business levels following the September 11 terrorist attacks.

        Casino expenses decreased by 2.3% to $49.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2002 from $50.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2001. The decrease iswas due to reductions in our charter bus program and payroll expenditures partially offset by an increase in promotional expenses in part related to enhancing the "Club Eldorado" program.

        Food, beverage and entertainment expenses decreased by approximately $1.0 million, or 3.0%, to $31.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2002 from $32.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2001. The decrease iswas primarily a result of a decrease in payroll expenditures, entertainment professional services and lower food cost of sales.

        Hotel expenses decreased by 8.4%, or $0.6 million, to $6.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2002 from $7.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2001 due to decreases in payroll expenditures and overall hotel operating expenses.

29



Selling, General and Administrative Expenses and Management Fees

        Selling, general and administrative expenses and management fees decreased by 4.7% to $27.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2002 from $29.1 million during the same period in 2001. The decrease was primarily due to decreases in payroll expenditures and management fees in the 2002 period.

Depreciation

        Depreciation decreased to $11.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2002 compared to $13.0 million in 2001, a decrease of $1.2 million, or 8.9%, due to some assets becoming fully depreciated.

32



Equity in Income of Unconsolidated Affiliates

        Earnings from the Company's unconsolidated affiliates, the Silver Legacy Joint Venture and Tamarack (which commenced operations on September 4, 2001), for the year ended December 31, 2002 were $9.0 million as compared to $10.4 million for the same period in 2001, a decrease of approximately $1.4 million, or 13.9%. Equity in income of the Silver Legacy Joint Venture decreased approximately $2.2 million for year ended December 31, 2002 compared to 2001. Equity in income in Tamarack increased approximately $0.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2002 compared to 2001. The 2001 earnings reflect a $103,000 loss from Tamarack due to the write-off of pre-opening expenses.

Other Income (Expense)

        Other income (expense) is comprised of interest expense, loss on investments, equity in loss of unconsolidated affiliate, and interest rate swap income. Interest expense is net of capitalized interest, interest income, and the gain on repurchase of bonds, net of unamortized bond fees. For the year ended December 31, 2002, interest expense decreased by approximately $1.6 million, or 13.6%, to $10.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2002 compared to $11.8 million for the same period in 2001 primarily due to a decrease in the average outstanding borrowings and a lower average interest rate in 2002 as compared to 2001. The decrease in average outstanding borrowings is partly due to the Company's purchase of $10.2 million, $2.0 million and $5.2 million principal amount of its 101/2% Notes on the open market in October 2001, June 2002 and August 2002, respectively. The Company recognized interest rate swap income of $1.1 million and equity in loss of its unconsolidated affiliate of $0.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2002. The Company capitalized interest of approximately $103,000 for the year ended December 31, 2002 compared to approximately $132,000 in 2001.

Net Income

        As a result of the factors described above, net income for the year ended December 31, 2002 increased by 0.3% to $13.5 million compared to a net income of $13.4 million in 2001.

Year Ended December 31, 2001 Compared to
Year Ended December 31, 2000

September 11 Events

        Terrorist attacks on the World Trade Center in New York City and the Pentagon outside Washington, D.C. on September 11, 2001 had an adverse effect on our operations in the weeks immediately following September 11. Eldorado's hotel occupancy rate for the remainder of the year following the September 11 attacks declined 6.9% as compared to the same period in 2000. The volume of gaming, showroom occupancy and customer counts at the Eldorado's restaurants also were

30



down significantly during the remainder of the year compared to the same period in 2000. Effective September 24, 2001, the Company reacted to the effects of the September 11 attacks by implementing a hiring freeze, a reduction in staff through attrition and adjustment of our hourly employees' work week to correspond to reduced business levels. Because our results for the year ended December 31, 2001 were impacted by a number of factors, including an economy that was already weakening before September 11 and increased competition from Native American casinos in northern California, it is difficult to measure the precise impact the September 11 attacks had on our 2001 results.

Net Revenues

        Net revenues decreased by approximately $20.9 million, or 12.3%, to $149.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2001 compared to $170.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2000. The decrease in net revenues resulted from decreases in casino revenues, food, beverage and entertainment revenues and hotel revenues.

        Casino revenues decreased by 14.0% to $97.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2001, compared to $113.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2000. The decrease in casino revenues was due to decreased gaming volumes and lower hold percentages as compared to the previous period.

        Food, beverage and entertainment revenues decreased by approximately $4.4 million, or 8.6%, to $46.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2001 compared to $50.8 million in 2000. The decrease was primarily due to lower showroom occupancy and fewer customer counts in the 2001 period.

        Hotel revenues decreased to $17.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2001 from $18.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2000, a decrease of 3.2%. This decrease is attributable to a decrease in hotel occupancy to approximately 90% for the year ended December 31, 2001 compared to 92% for the same period in 2000. The Company's average daily rate ("ADR") remained comparable at approximately $59 for the years ended December 31, 2001 and 2000. The hotel occupancy decrease was partly due to remodeling of hotel rooms in 2001 which put nearly 3,100 available room nights out of order. Had some of these room nights been available on select weekends, the hotel would have been at capacity on these weekends. There was also an overall decline in hotel occupancy in the Reno market, partly due to the events of September 11, which was also felt at the Eldorado, particularly during the weeks immediately following September 11.

        Other revenues decreased slightly to $5.3 million for year ended December 31, 2001 as compared to $5.5 million in 2000. The decrease is attributable to lower revenues in retail sales.

        Promotional allowances, expressed as a percentage of casino revenues, were 18.0% in 2001 compared to 15.5% in 2000.

Operating Expenses

        The Company's operating expenses decreased by 7.6% to $133.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2001, from $144.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2000. This decrease is mainly attributable to decreased casino, food, beverage and entertainment and selling, general and administrative expenses.

        Casino expenses decreased by 5.5% to $50.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2001 from $53.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2000. The decrease is attributable to decreases in bad debt, gaming taxes and payroll expenditures.

        Food, beverage and entertainment expenses decreased by approximately $2.8 million, or 7.9%, to $32.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2001 from $34.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2000. The decrease is primarily a result of decreases in payroll expenditures, showroom professional services and lower food and beverage cost of sales.

31



        Hotel expenses decreased by 6.8%, or $0.5 million, to $7.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2001 from $8.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2000 due to various decreases in hotel operating expenses.

Selling, General and Administrative Expenses and Management Fees

        Selling, general and administrative expenses and management fees decreased by 9.5% to $29.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2001 from $32.1 million during the same period in 2000. The decrease was primarily due to decreases in advertising, payroll expenditures, management fees and accrued bonuses in the 2001 period.

Depreciation

        Depreciation decreased to $13.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2001 compared to $13.4 million in 2000, due to some assets becoming fully depreciated.

Equity in Income of Unconsolidated Affiliates

        Earnings from the Company's unconsolidated affiliates, the Silver Legacy Joint Venture and Tamarack (which commenced operations on September 4, 2001), for the year ended December 31, 2001 were $10.4 million as compared to $11.9 million for the same period in 2000, a decrease of approximately $1.5 million, or 12.8%. The 2001 earnings reflect a $103,000 loss from Tamarack due to the write-off of pre-opening expenses.

Other Income (Expense)

        Other income (expense) is comprised of interest expense, loss on investments, equity in loss of unconsolidated affiliate, and interest rate swap income. Interest expense is net of capitalized interest, interest income, and the gain on repurchase of bonds, net of unamortized bond fees. For the year ended December 31, 2001, interest expense decreased by approximately $1.2 million, or 9.3%, to $11.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2001 compared to $13.0 million for the same period in 2000 primarily due to a decrease in the average outstanding borrowings and a lower average interest rate in 2001 as compared to 2000. In October 2001, the Company purchased $10.2 million principal amount of its 101/2% Notes on the open market. The Company recognized a loss on investment of $0.2 million and equity in loss of its unconsolidated affiliate of $0.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2001. The Company capitalized interest of approximately $132,000 for the year ended December 31, 2001 compared to $105,000 during 2000.

Net Income

        As a result of the factors described above, net income for the year ended December 31, 2001 decreased by 44.4% to $13.4 million compared to a net income of $24.2 million in 2000.

Corporate Expenses/Management Fees

        The Company pays management fees to Recreational Enterprises, Inc. and Hotel Casino Management, Inc., the owners of 55% and 29% of the Company's equity interests, respectively. The management fees paid to Recreational Enterprises, Inc. and Hotel Casino Management, Inc. are included in selling, generaltotaled $295,000, $48,000 and administrative expenses and totaled $48,000, $1.2 million and $1.8 million for the years ended December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001, and 2000, respectively. Due to a downturn in economic conditions, Recreational Enterprises, Inc. and Hotel Casino Management, Inc. relinquished part of their management fees in 2001 and most of their management fees in 2002. Absent this relinquishment of fees, the amounts payable to Recreational Enterprises, Inc. and Hotel Casino Management, Inc. for 2002 would have totaled approximately $709,000. Although not legally obligated

32



to do so, Recreational Enterprises, Inc. and Hotel Casino Management, Inc. have indicated their willingness, absent an improvement in economic conditions, to relinquish a similar amount of their management fees for 2003. Historically, the salaries of senior executive officers and certain other key employees were not directly incurred but were paid from a portion of the management fees paid to Recreational Enterprises, Inc. As of July 1, 1996, the aggregate annual salaries of such senior executive officers and other key employees became payroll obligations of the Company and the Company entered into a Management Agreement with Recreational Enterprises, Inc. and Hotel Casino Management, Inc. providing that future management fees paid to Recreational Enterprises, Inc. and Hotel Casino Management, Inc. will not exceed 1.5% of the Company's annual net revenues. As a result of the Management Agreement and the Company's assumption of responsibility for the salaries of senior executive officers and other key employees previously paid by Recreational Enterprises, Inc. from its management fee, the Company incurred such salaries and management fees for the years ended December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001 and 2000 of $1.9 million, $1.7 million $3.0 million and $4.0$3.0 million, respectively.

Seasonality

        Hotel/casino operations in the Reno market are subject to seasonal variation, with the strongest operating results generally occurring in the third quarter of each year and the weakest results generally

33



occurring during the period from November through February. Such variationsVariations occur when weather conditions have mademake travel to Reno by visitors from northern California and the Pacific Northwest difficult. The following table shows the Company's percentage of gross revenues by quarter for each of 2003, 2002 2001 and 2000.2001.



 2002
 2001
 2000
 
 2003
 2002
 2001
 
First quarterFirst quarter 22.6%23.2%23.2%First quarter 24.8%22.6%23.2%
Second quarterSecond quarter 25.4%26.7%25.9%Second quarter 24.9%25.4%26.7%
Third quarterThird quarter 28.9%27.7%28.9%Third quarter 26.8%28.9%27.7%
Fourth quarterFourth quarter 23.1%22.4%22.0%Fourth quarter 23.5%23.1%22.4%
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
Total 100.0%100.0%100.0%Total 100.0%100.0%100.0%

Liquidity and Capital Resources

        The Company's primary sources of liquidity and capital resources have been through cash flow from operations, borrowings under various credit agreements and the issuance in July 1996 of $100 million in aggregate principal amount of the 101/2% Notes. Since 1996, the Company has completed several expansion and remodeling projects, accounting for a significant use of cash flow from operations and borrowed funds. Net cash provided by operating activities was $17.6$13.6 million for the year ended December 31, 20022003 compared to $16.0$17.6 million for the prior year.

        At December 31, 2002,2003, the Company had $8.1$7.4 million of cash and cash equivalents and, after giving effect to then outstanding borrowings, and letters of credit, it had approximately $38.3$17.0 million of borrowing capacity available pursuant to its New Credit Facility (as defined below) all of which could be utilized under the most restrictive of our loan covenants. The net proceeds of the offering by the Company and its wholly-owned subsidiary, Eldorado Capital Corp., of the 101/2% Notes (the "Offering") were used to repay a portion of the indebtedness under the Loan Agreement dated as of March 25, 1994, between the Company, the banks named therein and Bank of America NT&SA, as administrative agent (the "Former Credit Facility"). The Former Credit Facility was amended concurrently with the closing of the Offering to provide the Company with a senior secured revolving credit facility in the original amount of $50 million (as amended, the "Credit Facility"). On July 17, 2001, the Company's credit facility was amended and restated (the "New Credit Facility"). The New Credit Facility, which was further amended September 10, 2003, provides for a senior secured revolving credit facility of $40$30 million. The amount of credit available pursuant to the New Credit Facility reduces by $1.6$1.0 million on MarchDecember 31, 20032004 and at the end of each subsequent quarter until March 31, 2006, when the facility terminates and any balance then outstanding becomes due and

33



payable. Borrowings under the New Credit Facility bear interest, at the Company's option, at either (i) the greater of (a) the rate publicly announced from time to time by Bank of America as its "Prime Rate" or (b) the Federal Funds Rate plus .50% ("Base Rate") or (ii) a Eurodollar rate determined in accordance with the New Credit Facility. The effective rate of interest on borrowings under the New Credit Facility at December 31, 20022003 was 5.5%3.54% per annum. The New Credit Facility is secured by substantially all of the Company's real property. The New Credit Facility includes various restrictions and other covenants including: (i) restrictions on the disposition of property, (ii) restrictions on investments and acquisitions, (iii) restrictions on distributions to members of Resorts, (iv) restrictions on the incurrence of liens and negative pledges, (v) restrictions on the incurrence of indebtedness and the issuance of guarantees, (vi) restrictions on transactions with affiliates and, (vii) restrictions on annual capital expenditures including capital leases. The New Credit Facility also contains financial covenants including a maximum total debt to EBITDA ratio, a maximum senior debt to EBITDA ratio, a minimum fixed charge coverage ratio and a minimum equity requirement. As of December 31, 20022003 the Company was in compliance with all provisions of the New Credit Facility.

34



        As of December 31, 2002,2003, the Company had outstanding (i) $82.7$64.2 million in aggregate principal amount of the 101/2% Notes, (ii) $1.0$13.0 million of borrowings and an additional $0.7 million of letter of credit under the New Credit Facility and (iii) $1.0$0.6 million of other long termlong-term debt (net of current portion).

        CashDuring the year ended December 31, 2003, we generated cash flows from operating activities of $13.6 million compared to $17.6 million in the prior year. The $4.0 million decrease in cash provided by operations was primarily due to the $6.9 million decline in net income. As of December 31, 2003, cash and cash equivalents were $7.4 million, sufficient for normal operating requirements.

        Cash used in investing activities for the year ended December 31, 20022003 was $13.4$4.7 million compared to cash used inprovided by investing activities of $5.8$13.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2001.2002. In 2002,2003, cash provided byused in investing activities related primarily to distributions from unconsolidated affiliates offset slightly by capital expenditures relating to slot purchases, our hotel remodeling and various equipment purchases. Distributions from unconsolidated affiliates increased $12.2decreased $14.2 million to $16.8$2.5 million for the year ended December 31, 20022003 compared to $4.6$16.7 million in 20012002 principally due to a special distribution of $10.0 million to ELLC at the time of issuance of the Silver Legacy Notes. The Silver Legacy Joint Venture also madeNotes and a $2.6 million prior year tax distributions to ELLCdistribution which was made on February 28, 2002. In June 2003, the Company sold its 85 acres of land in 2002 in the aggregate amount of $3.8Verdi, Nevada for approximately $2.5 million. On November 6, 2002, the Company received $2.4 million from the sale of property at 444 North Center Street, Reno, Nevada, on which the Company's human resources offices werehad been located. Capital spending for the year ended December 31, 2002 decreased $1.52003 increased $5.1 million to $4.9$9.9 million compared to $6.4$4.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2001 mainly due2002. This increase is primarily related to a decreased capital budget in 2002.our hotel remodel and to our purchase of new ticket-in, ticket-out slot machines of which, as of December 31, 2003, the Company had approximately 512 on its casino floor.

        Cash used in financing activities was $9.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2003, compared to $32.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2002, compared to $9.6 million for2002. For the year ended December 31, 2001. The2003, the Company purchased $7.2and redeemed $7.9 million, $1.75 million and $8.8 million principal amount of its 101/2% Notes and made principal paymentsfacilitated by borrowing $18.5 million under its credit facility. In 2002, the Company reduced the outstanding portion of $20.8 million on the New Credit Facility by $20.8 million primarily utilizing the aforementioned distributions to ELLC from the Silver Legacy Joint Venture in 2002.the aggregate amount of $12.6 million in 2003.

        The Operating Agreement of Resorts dated June 28, 1996 obligates Resorts to distribute each year for as long as it is not taxed as a corporation to each of its members an amount equal to such members' allocable share of the taxable income of Resorts multiplied by the highest marginal combined Federal, state and local income tax rate applicable to individuals for that year. For the year ended December 31, 2002,2003, Resorts made distributions of $4.6$2.5 million to its members as compared with distributions of $6.0$4.6 million during 2001,2002, all of which was for income taxes.

        The Company's future sources of liquidity are anticipated to be from its operating cash flow, funds available from the New Credit Facility and capital lease financing for certain of its fixed asset purchases. The Company's anticipated uses of cash in 20032004 will be for hotel remodeling ($3.6 million), new slot machines ($4.22.0 million), hotel remodeling ($1.0 million), recurring capital expenditures (estimated at approximately $2.5$2.0 million) and debt service. The total amount budgeted for the hotel remodeling is $12.0$11.0 million of which $2.2$6.2 million had been incurred as of December 31, 2002. Because this projected is budgeted over a period of several years, the total cost could exceed the budgeted cost. In January 2003, the Company purchased $7.9 million principal amount of its 101/2% Notes on the open market. The Company borrowed $8.0 million under its New Credit Facility to facilitate the purchase.2003. We believe our capital resources are adequate to meet our obligations including the funding of our debt service and recurring capital expenditures. The Company has placed on the market for sale its 90 acres of land located in Verdi, Nevada.

34


        In July 2002,2003, the Company renewed its property and general and liability insurance policies which included a change to its previous earthquake coverage. Under the new policy, the Eldorado and our partner, the Silver Legacy, have combined flood and earthquake coverage of $400$500 million. In the event that an earthquake or flood causes damage to only the Eldorado'sEldorado or the Silver Legacy property, the Eldoradothat property is eligible to receive up to $400$500 million in coverage depending on the replacement cost. However, in the event that both properties are damaged, the Eldorado is entitled to receive, to the extent of any replacement cost incurred, up to $192$223.5 million of the coverage amount and up to the portion of the

35



other $208$276.5 million, if any, remaining after satisfaction of the Silver Legacy's claim. In addition, our new insurance policy excludesincludes terrorism coverage up to $150 million. In the event that an act of terrorism causes damage to only the Eldorado or the Silver Legacy property, that property is eligible to receive up to $150 million in excesscoverage depending on the replacement cost. In the event both properties are damaged, the Eldorado is entitled to receive, to the extent of $100,000.any replacement cost incurred, up to $67.0 million of the coverage amount and up to the portion of the other $83.0 million, if any, remaining after satisfaction of the Silver Legacy's claim.

Contractual Commitments

        The following table summarizes our material obligations and commitments to make future payments under certain contracts, including long-term debt obligations, capitalized leases and operating leases, as of December 31, 2002.2003.

 
 Payment Due by Period (In Thousands)
Type of Contractual Obligation

 2003
 2004
 2005
 2006
 Total
Long-Term Debt Instruments $344 $355 $373 $83,963 $85,035

Capital Leases

 

 

112

 

 

63

 

 

0

 

 

0

 

 

175

Operating Leases

 

 

635

 

 

426

 

 

150

 

 

77

 

 

1,288
  
 
 
 
 
 
Total

 

$

1,091

 

$

844

 

$

523

 

$

84,040

 

$

86,498
  
 
 
 
 
 
 Type of Contractual Obligation
Payment due by Period (in Thousands)

 Long-Term Debt
Instruments

 Capital Leases
 Operating Leases
 Total
2004 $355 $84 $629 $1,068
2005  373  17  157  547
2006  77,517  0  77  77,594
2007  0  0  0  0
2008  0  0  0  0
Thereafter  0  0  0  0
  
 
 
 
 Total $78,245 $101 $863 $79,209
  
 
 
 

        The repayment of our long-term debt, which consists of our indebtedness under the New Credit Facility and the indebtedness evidenced by the 101/2% Notes, is subject to acceleration upon the occurenceoccurrence of an event of default under the New Credit Facility or the indenture relating to the 101/2% Notes.

        We routinely enter into operational contracts in the ordinary course of our business, including construction contracts for minor projects that are not material to our business or financial condition as a whole. Our commitments relating to these contracts are recognized as liabilities in our consolidated balance sheets when services are provided with respect to such contracts. We expect to spend approximately $3.6 million in 2003 on the hotel room remodel and $4.2$2.0 million on new slot machines.machines in 2004.

        AtThe Company made cash interest payments of $9.1 million, $11.2 million and $12.2 million during the years ended December 31, 2003, 2002 we had outstanding a letter of credit in the amount of $685,000 which reduced by that amount the available borrowing capacity otherwise then available under the New Credit Facility.and 2001, respectively. The Company guaranteesanticipates making lower cash interest payments in 2004 than 2003 due to anticipated lower average borrowings and lower average interest rates.

Off Balance Sheet Arrangements

        The Company previously guaranteed 54.28% of a $1.25 million working capital line for MindPlay LLC. TheUpon the sale of substantially all of the assets of MindPlay on February 19, 2004, this line matures on December 31, 2003was paid in full by the purchaser and is not reflected on our consolidated balance sheets.terminated.

Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements

        In JuneAugust 2001, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards ("SFAS") No. 143, "Accounting for Asset Retirement Obligations." This statement addresses financial accounting and reporting for obligations associated with the retirement of tangible long-lived assets and the associated asset retirement costs. This statement applies to all entities and to all legal obligations associated with the retirement of long-lived assets that result from the acquisition, construction, development and the normal operation of a long-lived asset, except for certain obligations of lessees. This statement is effective for the Company's 2003 fiscal year and early adoption is permitted. The Company believes that the adoption of this statement will not have a material impact on its financial condition or results of operations.

        In August 2001, the FASB issued SFAS No. 144, "Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets." This statement requires one accounting model be used for long-lived assets to be

35



disposed of by sale, whether previously held and used or newly acquired and broadens the presentation of discontinued operations to include additional disposal transactions. This statement is effective for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2001. The Company therefore adopted SFAS No. 144 in January 2002. The Company periodically evaluates its long-lived assets for impairment. Adoption of SFAS No. 144 did not have a material impact on the Company's financial condition or results of operations.

36


        In April 2002, the FASB issued SFAS No. 145, "Rescission of FASB Statements No. 4, 44, and 64, Amendment of FASB Statement No. 13, and Technical Corrections." SFAS No. 145 rescinds SFAS No. 4, "Reporting Gains and Losses from Extinguishment of Debt." Under SFAS No. 4, all gains and losses from extinguishment of debt were required to be aggregated, if material, and classified as an extraordinary item, net of related income tax effect, on the statement of income. SFAS No. 145 requires all gains and losses from extinguishment of debt to be classified as extraordinary only if they meet the criteria of Accounting Principles Board ("APB") Opinion 30. Any gain or loss on extinguishment of debt that was classified as an extraordinary item in prior periods presented that does not meet the criteria in APB Opinion 30 shallis required to be reclassified. This statement is effective for the Company's 2003 fiscal year and early adoption is permitted. In May 2002, the Company adopted this statement andstatement. Accordingly, the Company's gain (loss) on bond repurchases is classified its fiscal 2002 gain on repurchase of bonds, net of unamortized bond fees, of $50,500 as a component of interest expense. The Company also reclassified its fiscal 2001 extraordinary gain on repurchase of bonds, net of unamortized bond fees, of $343,000 as a component of interest expenseother income (expense) for all years presented.

        In June 2002, the FASB issued SFAS No. 146, "Accounting for Costs Associated with Exit or Disposal Activities." This statement addresses financial accounting and reporting for costs associated with exit or disposal activities and nullifies EITF No. 94-3, "Liability Recognition for Certain Employee Termination Benefits and Other Costs to Exit an Activity (including Certain Costs Incurred in a Restructuring)." This statement requires that a liability for a cost associated with an exit or disposal activity be recognized when the liability is incurred. A fundamental conclusion reached by the FASB in SFAS No. 146 is that an entity's commitment to a plan, by itself, does not create a present obligation to others that meets the definition of a liability. This statement also establishes that fair value is the objective for initial measurement of the liability. The provisions of this statement areCompany adopted SFAS No. 146 effective for exit or disposal activities that are initiated after December 31, 2002, with early application encouraged.January 1, 2003. The Company does not expect the adoption of this statement todid not have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.condition or results of operations.

        In November 2002, the FASB issued FASB Interpretation No. 45, "Guarantor's Accounting and Disclosure Requirements for Guarantees, including indirectIncluding Indirect Guarantees of Indebtedness of Others" ("FIN 45"). FIN 45 expands the information disclosures required by guarantors for obligations under certain types of guarantees. It also requires initial recognition at fair value of a liability for such guarantees. The initial recognition and initial measurement provisions of this Interpretation are applicable on a prospective basis to guarantees issued or modified after December 31, 2002, irrespective of the guarantor's fiscal year-end.2002. The disclosure requirements inof this Interpretation are effective for financial statements of interim or annual periods ending after December 15, 2002. The Company believes that the adoptionAdoption of this statement willFIN 45 did not have a material impact on its financial condition or results of operation.

        In January 2003, the FASB issued FASB Interpretation No. 46, "Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities" ("FIN 46"), which addresses consolidation by business enterprises where equity investors do not bear the residual economic risks and rewards. These entities have been commonly referred to as "special-purpose entities". Companies are required to apply the provisions of FIN 46 prospectively for all variable interest entities created after January 31, 2003. For public companies, all interests acquired before February 1, 2003, must follow the new rules in account periods beginning after June 15, 2003.

36



The Company has not yet evaluated the impact FIN 46 is expected to have on the Company's financial condition or results of operations.

        In April 2003, the FASB issued SFAS 149, "Amendments of Statement 133 on Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities." This statement amends SFAS 133, "Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities", and clarifies financial accounting and reporting for derivative instruments, including certain derivative instruments embedded in other contracts and hedging activities under SFAS 133. This statement is effective for contracts entered into or modified after June 30, 2003, except as stated below and for hedging relationships designated after June 30, 2003. The provisions of this statement that relate to Statement 133 Implementation Issues that have been effective for fiscal quarters that began prior to June 15, 2003, should continue to be applied in accordance with their respective effective dates. The adoption of this statement did not have a material impact on the Company's results of operations or financial position.

        In May 2003, the FASB issued SFAS 150, "Accounting for Certain Financial Instruments with Characteristics of both Liabilities and Equity." This statement establishes standards for how an issuer classifies and measures certain financial instruments with characteristics of both liabilities and equity. Financial instruments that are within the scope of the statement, which previously were often classified as equity, must now be classified as liabilities. This statement is effective for financial instruments entered into or modified after May 31, 2003, and otherwise is generally effective at the beginning of the first interim period beginning after June 15, 2003. The adoption of this statement did not have a material effect on the Company's results of operations or financial position.

37




Item 7A.    Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.

        Market risk is the risk of loss arising from adverse changes in market rates and prices, such as interest rates, foreign currency exchange rates and commodity prices. TheWe are exposed to market risk in the form of fluctuations in interest rates and their potential impact on our variable rate debt outstanding. At December 31, 2003, the interest rate on a portion$13.0 million of the Company's debt ($1.0 million at December 31, 2002) iswas subject to fluctuation based on changes in short-term interest rates. Interest expense could increase as a result of this factor. The Company evaluates its exposure to market risk by monitoring interest rates in the marketplace and it has, on occasion, utilized derivative financial instruments to help manage this risk. The Company does not utilize derivative financial instruments for trading purposes. There were no material quantitative changes in our market risk exposure, or how such risks are managed, during the years ended December 31, 20022003 and 20012002 other than as discussed below.

        On August 15, 2002, the Company and Bank of America N.A., entered into a fixed-to-floating swap agreement with a $50.0 million notional amount. Pursuant to this swap agreement, which had an original expiration date of February 15, 2005, we received interest at a fixed rate of 3.85% per annum and we paid interest based on a floating rate index that was computed on a 6-month LIBOR, in arrears. The amounts due under the swap agreement were payable on February 15 and August 15 of each year, beginning February 15, 2003. Effective October 9, 2002, the Company and Bank of America, N.A. entered into an agreement to terminate this swap agreement. In consideration of the early termination, Bank of America, N.A. paid the Company $903,070.

        On November 12, 2002, the Company and Bank of America N.A., entered into a fixed-to-floating swap agreement with a $50.0 million notional amount. Pursuant to this swap agreement, which hashad an original expiration date of August 15, 2006, we received interest at a fixed rate of 3.44% per annum and we paid interest based on a floating rate index that was computed on a 6-month LIBOR, in arrears. The amounts due under the swap agreement were payable on February 15 and August 15 of each year, beginning February 15, 2003. Effective February 12, 2003, the Company and Bank of America, N.A. entered into an agreement to terminate this swap agreement. In consideration of the early termination, Bank of America, N.A. paid the Company $10,000.

        The following table provides information as of December 31, 20022003 about our debt obligations, including debt that is sensitive to changes in interest rates, and presents principal payments and related weighted- averageweighted-average interest rates by expected maturity dates. Weighted-average variable rates are based on implied forward rates in the yield curve. Implied forward rates should not be considered a predictor of actual future interest rates.


 Years ending December 31,
(in thousands)

  Year ending December 31,
(in thousands)

 

 2003
 2004
 2005
 2006
 Total
  2004
 2005
 2006
 2007
 2008
 Thereafter
 Total
 
101/2% Senior Subordinated Notes $ $ $ $82,695 $82,695  $ $ $64,249 $0 $0 $0 $64,249 
Fixed interest rate     10.5% 10.5%      10.5%       10.5%
New Credit Facility $ $ $ $1,000 $1,000  $ $ $13,000 $0 $0 $0 $13,000 
Notes payable to individuals $344 $355 $373 $268 $1,340  $335 $373 $268 $0 $0 $0 $996 
Variable average interest rate  8.74% 8.89% 9.00% 6.04% 7.34%  8.89% 9.00% 3.65%       3.93%


Item 8.    Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.

        Reference is made to the reports of Deloitte & Touche LLP and Arthur Andersen LLP, dated March 7, 200322, 2004 and March 5, 2002, respectively, and the consolidated financial statements of Eldorado Resorts LLC appearing on pages 6162 through 83 of this report and the reports of Deloitte & Touche LLP and Arthur Andersen LLP, dated February 25, 2003March 22, 2004 and February 8, 2002, respectively, and the

37



consolidated financial statements of Circus and Eldorado Joint Venture appearing on pages 84 through 101,103, which are incorporated in this Item 8 by thissuch reference.

38




Item 9.    Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure.

        Not applicable.


Item 9A.    Controls and Procedures.

        An evaluation was performed by management, with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officers, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures. Based on this evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officers have concluded that, as of December 31, 2003, our disclosure controls and procedures are effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed in the reports that we file or submit under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in applicable rules and forms of the Securities and Exchange Commission.

        There have been no changes in our internal controls over financial reporting that occurred during the fourth fiscal quarter of the year ended December 31, 2003, that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, these internal controls over financial reporting.

39



PART III

Item 10.Item 10. Directors and Executive Officers of the Registrants.

        Resorts is overseen by its Board of Managers, which currently consists of four Board Members. The initial Board Members designated in the Operating Agreement are Donald Carano, Recreational Enterprises, Inc. and Hotel Casino Management, Inc. In September 1996, the Members elected Leslie Stone Heisz as an additional Board Member. Each corporation that serves as a Board Member must select a corporate officer as its representative. Recreational Enterprises, Inc. has selected Gary Carano as its representative and Hotel Casino Management, Inc. has selected Raymond J. Poncia, Jr. as its representative and each has served in such capacity since 1996. A corporation which is a Board Member may change its representative at any time by providing notice to Resorts. The Operating Agreement provides that the Board of Managers will consist of at least three, but not more than seven, Board Members, as determined by a majority of the Board of Managers.

        Board Members are elected at annual meetings of the Resorts' members for one-year terms. Any Board Member may be removed from office with a vote of 60% of the membership interests, but no Board Member may be removed where there would be enough votes to elect that Board Member at an election. In an election, each Member is entitled to as many votes as equals the number of percentage points of such Member's interest multiplied by the number of Board Members to be elected. Members can cast all of their votes for a single Board Member or distribute them among the candidates for Board Members as they see fit. The Board of Managers generally has control over the management and affairs of Resorts. Board Members are required to devote enough time to Resorts to reasonably perform their duties. Resorts' Chief Executive Officer, Donald L. Carano, supervises the day-to-day operations of Resorts. Members and interest holders have no right to participate directly in management or control of Resorts, except for votes required for certain extraordinary transactions described in the Operating Agreement.

        Resorts' Board of Managers, which does not have a separate audit committee, has determined that Leslie Stone Heisz, who is a member of the Board of Managers, is an "audit committee financial expert" in that she has the following attributes:

    an understanding of generally accepted accounting principles and financial statements;

    the ability to assess the general application of such principles in connection with the accounting for estimates, accruals and reserves;

    experience preparing, auditing, analyzing or evaluating financial statements that present a breadth and level of complexity of accounting issues that are generally comparable to the breadth and complexity of issues that can reasonably be expected to be raised by the Company's financial statements or experience actively supervising one or more persons engaged in such activities;

    an understanding of internal control over financial reporting; and

    an understanding of audit committee functions.

The Board of Managers has also determined that Ms. Heisz is "independent" as that term is defined under current rules of the New York Stock Exchange (the "NYSE"). None of Resorts' or Capital's securities are listed on the NYSE or any other national securities exchange or any national securities association, nor is there any current intention to so list any securities of Resorts or Capital in the future.

        Capital's Board of Directors, which does not have a separate audit committee, has determined that it does not have an "audit committee financial expert" as that term is defined under current rules of

40



the NYSE. The Board of Directors does not believe Capital requires an audit committee financial expert since it has no operations and is consolidated for financial reporting purposes with Resorts.

        Resorts' Board of Managers and Capital's Board of Directors have adopted a code of ethics that applies to their principal executive officer, principal financial officer, principal accounting officer, or persons performing similar functions. The code of ethics is a written standard designed to deter wrongdoing and to promote

    honest and ethical conduct, including the ethical handling of actual or apparent conflicts of interest between personal and professional relationships;

    full, fair, accurate, timely and understandable disclosure in reports and documents that the Company file with, or submit to, the SEC and in other public communications made by the Company;

    compliance with applicable governmental laws, rules and regulations;

    the prompt internal reporting of violations of the code to an appropriate person identified in the code; and

    accountability for adherence to the code.

        We undertake to provide to any person without charge, upon request, a copy of the code of ethics. A request should be directed to Eldorado Resorts LLC, 345 N. Virginia St., Reno, Nevada 89501 Attention: Chief Financial Officer.

        The Operating Agreement provides that no Board Member or Officer will be liable to Resorts, its Members or holders of its membership interests for acts or omissions of such Board Member or Officer in connection with the business or affairs of Resorts, including for breach of fiduciary duty or mistake of judgment, except for acts involving intentional misconduct, fraud or knowing violations of the law. The Operating Agreement also provides that Resorts will indemnify, defend and hold harmless every Board Member and Officer for any losses arising out of Resorts or its business or affairs, unless such losses are based on acts or omissions involving intentional misconduct, fraud or a knowing violation of the law.

        The following tables set forth certain information with respect to the individuals who are members of the Board of Managers (each a "Board Member"), executive officers of Resorts or the Eldorado and other significant employees. Also set forth are the respective positions with Capital held by each individual who is a director or officer of Capital.

3841




Board Members and Executive Officers

Name

 Age
 Position(s)
Donald L. Carano 7172 Presiding Board Member, Chief Executive Officer and President of Resorts; President and Director of Capital

Robert M. Jones

 
60
61

 

Chief Financial Officer of Resorts

Gene R. Carano

 
47
48

 

Vice President and Secretary of Resorts and Assistant General Manager of the Eldorado; Treasurer of Capital

Gregg R. Carano

 
43
44

 

Vice President of Resorts and General Manager of the Eldorado; Director of Capital

Gary L. Carano

 
50
51

 

Board Member—Appointed by Recreational Enterprises, Inc. as its corporate representative

Raymond J. Poncia, Jr.

 
69
70

 

Board Member—Appointed by Hotel Casino Management, Inc. as its corporate representative; Director of Capital

Leslie Stone Heisz

 
42
43

 

Board Member

       

Name

 Age
 Significant Employees
Position(s)

Robert B. MacKay 5556 Director of Administration of the Eldorado

Robert B. Mouchou

 
47
48

 

Vice President of Operations of the Eldorado

Rick W. Murdock

 
47
48

 

Vice President of Sales and Casino Marketing of the Eldorado

Rhonda B. Carano

 
49
50

 

Vice President of Advertising and Public Relations of the Eldorado

        Donald L. Carano.    Mr. Carano has served as Chief Executive Officer of, and has owned a controlling interest in, Resorts or its predecessor since 1973 and has served as President and a director of Capital since its incorporation in 1996. Previously, he was an attorney with the firm of McDonald Carano Wilson LLP, with which he maintains an "of counsel" relationship. Mr. Carano has been involved in the gaming industry and has been a licensed casino operator since 1969. Mr. Carano's commitment to the development and promotion of tourism in Reno has earned him several awards, including the Nevada Food and Beverage Directors Association Man-of-the-Year Award, the American Lung Association 1993 Distinguished Community Service Award and the 1992 Hotelier of the Year Award. Also, since 1984, Mr. Carano has been the Chief Executive Officer of the Ferrari Carano Winery. He is the father of Gary, Gene, Glenn and Gregg Carano and is married to Rhonda Carano.

        Robert M. Jones.    Mr. Jones has served as Chief Financial Officer of Resorts or its predecessor since 1989. Prior to joining the Predecessor Partnership in 1984, Mr. Jones spent fourteen years in public accounting, ten of which were as an audit principal with the international accounting firm of Arthur Young & Company. Mr. Jones is a former Certified Public Accountant, was an honors graduate of the University of Arizona with a major in Accounting and has a Master of Business Administration degree in Taxation from Golden Gate University in San Francisco.

42



        Gene R. Carano.    Mr. Carano has served as Assistant General Manager of the Eldorado since July 2002. From 1998 to June 2002, he served as General Manager of the Eldorado and served as Vice President of Resorts or its predecessor since 1993 and has been Secretary of Resorts since June 1996. Mr. Carano has served as Treasurer of Capital since its incorporation in 1996. From 1993 until 1998 he

39



served as a Co-General Manager of the Eldorado. From 1986 to 1993, Mr. Carano served as the Eldorado's Director of Gaming. Prior to joining the Eldorado, Mr. Carano held various positions at another major casino in northern Nevada, including slot floor supervisor and pit boss. Mr. Carano studied Business Management and Hotel Administration at Utah State University and the University of Nevada, Las Vegas.

        Gregg R. Carano.    Mr. Carano has served as General Manager of the Eldorado since July 2002. He also has served as Vice President of Resorts or its predecessor since 1994 and has served as Vice President of the Eldorado since July 1998. Mr. Carano has served as a director of Capital since its incorporation in 1996. From 1993 until July 1998, he served as a Co-General Manager of the Eldorado. He served as General Manager of Circus Circus-Reno from 1993 to 1994. From 1985 to 1993, Mr. Carano served as Director of Food and Beverage at the Eldorado. Mr. Carano holds a Bachelor of Science Degree in Hotel/Restaurant Management from Florida International University and an Associates Degree in Occupational Studies in Culinary Arts from the Culinary Institute of America.

        Gary L. Carano.    Mr. Carano has served as General Manager of the Silver Legacy since 1995. Previously, he served as Assistant General Manager, General Manager and Chief Operating Officer of the Eldorado from 1980 to 1994. Mr. Carano holds a Bachelors Degree in Business Administration from the University of Nevada, Reno.

        Raymond J. Poncia, Jr.    Mr. Poncia has had an ownership interest in the Eldorado since 1973 and has been involved in the gaming industry since 1968. He has been involved with the Eldorado in the areas of development, architectural and interior design, construction financing and business planning. Mr. Poncia received his architectural degree from Case-Reserve University and has been a licensed architect in private practice since 1960. Mr. Poncia has served as a director of Capital since its incorporation in 1996.

        Leslie Stone Heisz.    Ms. Heisz has been a Board Member since 1996. Ms. Heisz has been a Senior Advisor at Lazard FréresFreres & Co. LLC since March 2003. From December 1996 to December 2002, she was a Managing Director of Dresdner Kleinwort Wasserstein, where she had been a Director since 1995. Prior thereto, Ms. Heisz was a Vice President at Salomon Brothers Inc. where she provided capital raising and financial advisory services to a wide variety of companies. Ms. Heisz received a M.B.A. and a B.S. from U.C.L.A.

        Robert B. MacKay.    Mr. MacKay has been the Director of Administration of the Eldorado since 1989. From 1985 to 1989, Mr. MacKay served as the Eldorado's Treasurer. He also has held the positions of Director of Finance and Controller of the Eldorado. Mr. MacKay is a Certified Public Accountant and is a graduate of the University of Nevada, Reno with a degree in Accounting.

        Robert B. Mouchou.    Mr. Mouchou has been the Vice President of Operations of the Eldorado since 1997. Mr. Mouchou joined the Eldorado in 1979 and has held a variety of positions, including Director of Gaming, Games Manager, Assistant Slot Manager, Casino Analyst, Assistant Controller and Audit Supervisor.

        Rick W. Murdock.    Mr. Murdock has been Vice President of Sales and Casino Marketing of the Eldorado since 1999, previously serving as Director of Casino Marketing of the Eldorado from 1995 until he assumed his current position. He began his career at the Eldorado in 1981 and has since held various positions, including Director of Sales, National Sales Manager and Assistant Hotel Manager.

        Rhonda B. Carano.    Mrs. Carano has been the Vice President of Advertising and Public Relations of the Eldorado since 1999, previously serving as Director of Advertising and Public Relations of the Eldorado from 1978 until 1999. Mrs. Carano is the Vice President of the Ferrari Carano Winery. She received a Bachelor of Science degree from the University of Nevada, Reno.

4043



Item 11.    Executive Compensation.

Summary Compensation Tables

        The following table sets forth all compensation paid by Resorts for the period from January 1, 20002001 through December 31, 2002,2003, to the Resort's officers named below (the "Named Officers").

 
 Annual
Compensation(1)

  
 
 
 All Other
Compensation

 
 
 Year
 Salary
 Bonus
 
Donald Carano
Board Member and Chief Executive
Officer of Resorts
 2003
2002
2001
2000
 $

225,962
259,615
363,500
550,000
 $

0
0
0
 $

2,370
2,292
3,021
2,876
(2)


Robert Jones
Chief Financial Officer of Resorts

 

2003
2002
2001
2000

 

$


295,577
294,039
320,000
320,000

 

$


0
4,000
0
55,000

 

$


3,686
208,773
3,937
3,671

(3)


Gene Carano
Vice President of Resorts and
Assistant General Manager of the Eldorado

 

2003
2002
2001
2000

 

$


239,520
241,827
300,000
300,000

 

$


0
0
55,0000

 

$


1,936
1,676
3,937
3,671

(4)


Gregg Carano
Vice President of Resorts and
General Manager of the Eldorado

 

2003
2002
2001
2000

 

$


239,520
241,827
300,000
300,000

 

$


0
0
55,0000

 

$


3,436
3,176
3,937
3,671

(5)


Rob Mouchou
Vice President of Operations of the Eldorado

 

2003
2002
2001
2000

 

$


280,289
278,366
300,000
300,000

 

$


0
4,000
0
55,000

 

$


1,590
182,267
2,634
2,664

(6)


(1)
Salary shown for each year for each Named Officer includes any amount of such salary he or she elected to defer the receipt of pursuant to the Company's Deferred Compensation Plan.

(2)
Includes contributions to the Company's 401(k) Plan (as defined herein) of $1,500, payment of term life insurance premiums of $90 and payment of health insurance premiums of $702.$780.

(3)
Includes contributions to the Company's 401(k) Plan of $1,750, payment of term life insurance premiums of $90 and payment of health insurance premiums of $1,586 and deferred compensation payment of $205,347. See "Deferred Compensation Plan" in this Item 11.$1,846.

(4)
Includes payment of term life insurance premiums of $90 and payment of health insurance premiums of $1,586.$1,846.

(5)
Includes contributions to the Company's 401(k) Plan of $1,500, payment of term life insurance premiums of $90 and payment of health insurance premiums of $1,586.$1,846.

(6)
Includes contributions to the Company's 401(k) Plan of $1,500 and payment of term life insurance premiums of $90 and deferred compensation payment of $180,677. See "Deferred Compensation Plan" in this Item 11.$90.

1995 Performance and Appreciation Rights Plan

        Until June 1, 2000, the Eldorado Hotel Associates Limited Partnership 1995 Performance and Appreciation Rights Plan (the "Rights Plan"), which was adopted effective January 1, 1995, permitted the grant to certain executives and other key employees of the Company who had substantial responsibility for its management and growth with incentives and rewards in the form of performance

41



rights and appreciation rights. No performance rights were granted under the Rights Plan, which is administered by a Committee comprised of Donald Carano and two other individuals selected by the members of the Company (the "Rights Committee"). An employee's performance rights terminate upon such employee's exercise of any appreciation rights or the termination of such employee's employment with the Company. Upon the termination of an employee's employment with the Company, the employee will be entitled to exercise appreciation rights only to the extent that such rights have vested to such date.

44


        An appreciation right allows an employee upon exercise to receive compensation based on the difference between the value of the membership interests of the Company at the date the right was granted and the date of exercise. One appreciation right is intended to represent the economic equivalent of ownership of .00001% of one membership interest in the Company. Appreciation rights do not, however, entitle holders thereof to any rights in or to own or control any membership interests in the Company.

        Appreciation rights may not be transferred other than by will or the laws of descent and distribution or to a family trust created solely for the benefit of an employee or such employee's spouse and descendants. Appreciation rights may be exercised only by the employee holding such rights (or a legal guardian, legal representative, trustee of a family trust or executor of the estate of a deceased employee). The Rights Committee, however, may in its discretion allow certain other transfers of appreciation rights, such as transfers during the lifetime of an employee to the spouse and children of the employee.

        The Company has not granted any appreciation rights to the Named Officers since 1996. Nor did any of the Named Officers exercise any appreciation rights during 2002.2003. The following table provides certain information with respect to the appreciation rights held by the Named Officers as of December 31, 2002.2003.


 Number of Unexercised
Appreciation Rights as of
December 31, 2002

 Value of Unexercised
Appreciation Rights as of
December 31, 2002

 Number of Unexercised
Appreciation Rights as of
December 31, 2003

 Value of Unexercised
Appreciation Rights as of
December 31, 2003

Name

Exercisable
 Unexercisable
 Exercisable
 Unexercisable
Exercisable
 Unexercisable
 Exercisable
 Unexercisable
Donald Carano        
Robert Jones 50,000 25,000 $0 $0 50,000 25,000 $0 $0
Gene Carano 62,500 37,500 $0 $0 62,500 37,500 $0 $0
Gregg Carano 62,500 37,500 $0 $0 62,500 37,500 $0 $0
Rob Mouchou 37,500 12,500 $0 $0 37,500 12,500 $0 $0

Deferred Compensation Plan

        Effective January 1, 1990, the Eldorado Hotel Casino Deferred Compensation Plan (the "Deferred Compensation Plan") was established for the benefit of a select group of management and highly compensated employees. As of December 31, 2002,2003, three employees and one former employee of the Company were eligible to participate. Under the Deferred Compensation Plan, as presently administered, an eligible employee may elect each year to defer the receipt of a portion of his or her compensation from the Company. A participating employee is 100% vested with respect to any amount deferred pursuant to his or her deferral election. Amounts deferred in years prior to 1991, which were determined in the sole discretion of Resorts' Chief Executive Officer, Donald Carano, vest 20% per year so that they become vested over a five-year period. A participating employee becomes 100% vested in all amounts credited to such employee's account upon retirement, death, permanent disability or termination of employment with the Company for any reason other than fraud, or upon a sale of substantially all of the Company's assets or if the Carano family ceases to have majority ownership or control of the Company. Participating employees are entitled to receive annual distributions

42



commencing upon the earliest of the second month after death, permanent disability, retirement or, if employment is terminated for reasons other than death or disability prior to attainment of age 60, attainment of age 60. However, Resorts' Chief Executive Officer may in his sole discretion elect to make a distribution to a terminated employee prior to such terminated employee attaining age 60. In addition, Resorts' Chief Executive Officer may in his sole discretion elect to distribute an employee's benefits in the form of a lump sum distribution and may elect to distribute benefits to an employee over a shorter period of time than that provided for in the Deferred Compensation Plan. In 2002, the Chief Executive Officer elected to distribute lump sum distributions in the aggregate amount of $396,000

45



$396,000 to two participating employees, including Rob Mouchou, thus eliminating their participation in the plan. The Chief Executive Officer elected to distribute lump sum distributions totaling an additional $469,000 to three participating employees, including Robert Jones, representing 50% of their available balance under the plan as of December 31, 2002. One participating employee is receiving distributions over a period of time. Amounts the Company is obligated to distribute to remaining participants, including the Named Officers, pursuant to the Deferred Compensation Plan represent an unfunded obligation of the Company which, as of December 31, 2002,2003, totaled $634,000.$638,000. The only Named Officer currently participating in the Deferred Compensation Plan is Mr. Jones, who had approximately $205,000$218,000 available in the plan as of December 31, 2002.2003.

401(k) Retirement Savings Plan

        The Company maintains a savings plan (the "401(k) Plan") qualified under Sections 401(a) and 401(k) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended. Generally, all employees of the Company in the United States who are 21 years of age or older, who have completed six months and 1,000 hours of service and who are not covered by collective bargaining agreements are eligible to participate in the 401(k) Plan. Employees who elect to participate in the 401(k) Plan may defer up to 15% but not less than 1% of their annual compensation, subject to statutory and certain other limits. The Company makes matching contributions of 25% of the employees' contributions, up to a maximum of 0.75% of the employees' annual compensation and subject to certain other limitations.

Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation

        The Company has historically paid a management fee to each of Recreational Enterprises, Inc. and Hotel Casino Management, Inc. A portion of these fees represented compensation for services provided to the Company by certain members of the Carano family. Effective July 1, 1996, the Company entered into a new Management Agreement (the "Management Agreement") with Recreational Enterprises, Inc. and Hotel Casino Management, Inc. which provides that Recreational Enterprises, Inc. and Hotel Casino Management, Inc. (collectively, the "Managers") will, among other things, (a) develop strategic plans for the Company's business, including preparing annual budgets and capital expenditure plans, (b) provide advice and oversight with respect to financial matters of the Company, (c) establish and oversee the operation of financial accounting systems and controls and regularly review the Company's financial reports, (d) provide planning, design and architectural services to the Company and (e) furnish advice and recommendations with respect to certain other aspects of the Company's operations. In consideration for such services, the Company pays to the Managers a management fee not to exceed 1.5% of the Company's annual net revenues. There is no minimum payment required to be paid to the Managers pursuant to the Management Agreement. The current term of the Management Agreement continues in effect until July 1, 2005 and will be automatically renewed for additional three-year terms until terminated by one of the parties. Due to a downturn in economic conditions, Recreational Enterprises, Inc. and Hotel Casino Managment,Management, Inc. relinquished most of their management fees for 2002. Absent this relinquishment ofFor 2003, the Company paid management fees the amounts payable to Recreational Enterprises, Inc. and Hotel Casino Management, Inc. for 2002 would have been approximately $677,000of $274,997 and $32,000, respectively. As a result of the aforementioned relinquishment of fees, the Company paid management fees totaling$20,174, respectively, compared with $13,400 and $34,100, respectively to Recreational

43



Enterprises, Inc. and Hotel Casino Management, Inc. for 2002. Although not legally obligatedThere are no current plans to do so, Recreational Enterprises, Inc. and Hotel Casino Management, Inc. have indicated their willingness, absent an improvement in economic conditions, to relinquish a similar amount of theirincrease the management fees forin 2004 beyond the levels paid in 2003. There can be no assurance that the terms of the Management Agreement are at least as favorable to the Company as could be obtained from unaffiliated third parties.

        The CompanyResorts owns the entire parcel on which the Eldorado is located, except for approximately 30,000 square feet which is leased by the Company from C, S and Y Associates, a general partnership of which Donald Carano is a general partner (the "C, S and Y Lease"). The C, S and Y Lease expires on June 30, 2027. Annual rent is payable in an amount equal to the greater of (i) $400,000 or (ii) an amount based on a decreasing percentage of the Eldorado's gross gaming revenues for the year ranging from 3% of the

46



first $6.5 million of gross gaming revenues to 0.1% of gross gaming revenues in excess of $75 million. In 2002,2003, the rent paid pursuant to the C, S and Y Lease, totaled approximately $638,000.$629,000. In the opinion of the Company's management, the terms of the C, S and Y Lease are at least as favorable to the Company as could have been obtained from unaffiliated third parties.

        Donald Carano has been an attorney with the firm of McDonald Carano Wilson LLP ("McDonald Carano") since 1961. Mr. Carano maintains an "of counsel" relationship with McDonald Carano, but is not involved in the active practice of law or in the representation of the Company or any of its affiliates as an attorney. Donald Carano receives no compensation from McDonald Carano. The Company currently retains McDonald Carano in connection with a variety of legal matters. In the opinion of the Company's management, the fees paid to McDonald Carano are at least as favorable to the Company as could be obtained from any other law firm for comparable services.

        Effective December 13, 2000, Resorts entered into an agreement to form Tamarack Crossings, LLC and Tamarack Partners, LLC, each a Nevada limited liability company (collectively the "Tamarack Entities"), to develop, own and operate Tamarack Junction ("Tamarack"), a small casino then being constructed in south Reno, Nevada. In May 2001, the Tamarack Entities consummated a plan of merger with Tamarack Crossings, LLC being the surviving entity. In June 2001,entity in which Resorts entered into an agreement with the Robert and Nana Sullivan Family Trust (the "Trust"), an unaffiliated entity, to reduce Resorts' percentage interest in Tamarack Crossings, LLC toowns a 21.25% from 42.5%. Donald Carano, who then owned a 5% interest, exercised an option effective February 19, 2002 to purchase from the Trust an additional 21.25%, thus increasing his total interest to 26.25%.interest. Resorts has a nontransferable option to purchase from Donald Carano, at a purchase price equal to his cost plus any undistributed income attributable thereto, an additional 10%21.25% interest in Tamarack Crossings, LLC, which is exercisable until June 30, 2010. At December 31, 2002,2003, Tamarack, which opened September 4, 2001, had approximately 243244 slot machines, a keno game, a sports book and a themed restaurant. The business and affairsIn February 2004, Tamarack began construction of a planned $14.0 million expansion, financed by bank loans, which will increase the size of the Tamarack are managed by fourcurrent building from approximately 22,000 square feet to approximately 60,000 square feet. The expansion plans call for 200 additional slot machines and an expanded sports book and lounge. Construction is scheduled for completion in November 2004. Four members of Tamarack Crossings, LLC, including Resorts which has been designated "Chief Executive Manager" and is responsible for overseeingthree unaffiliated third parties, manage the day-to-day operationsbusiness and affairs of the Tamarack. Resorts has designated Gene Carano as its representative. At December 31, 2002,2003, Resorts' financial investment in Tamarack Crossings, LLC was $3.4$4.0 million. Resorts' capital contribution to Tamarack Crossings, LLC represents its proportionate share of the total capital contributions of the members. Additional capital contributions of the members, including Resorts, may be required for certain purposes, including the payment of operating costs and capital expenditures or the repayment of loans, to the extent such costs are not funded by prior capital contributions and earnings. The Company's investment in Tamarack is accounted for using the equity method of accounting. Equity in income related to Tamarack for the year ended December 31, 2002,2003, of $585,000$866,000 is included as a component of operating income. The Tamarack purchased products prior to its opening and has continued purchasing various products, such as meat and bakery items, from or through the Eldorado which totaled $461,000$98,000 in 2002.2003. The Tamarack purchased these products at the Company's cost.

44



        Effective July 1, 2000, Resorts and Avereon Research LTD. ("ARL") entered into an agreement to form MindPlay, LLC (the "MindPlay Entity"), for the purpose of developing, owning and marketing a sophisticated system which if successfully completed, will permit the tracking and surveillance of pit gaming operations ("MindPlay"). MindPlay is in the developmental stage and there is no assurance that the system will ever be successfully developed and marketed. In April 2002, Resorts purchasedowns an additional 1%18% interest in the MindPlay Entity, which increased Resorts percentage ownership to 19% after taking into account additional shares issued in 2002.Entity. Resorts also has an option to acquire from ARL an additional 2.3% interest in the MindPlay Entity. The purchase price is equal to $211,000 per 1% and is exercisable until June 30, 2004. The MindPlay Entity is managed by a Board of Managers, which consists of three Managers designated by ARL and two Managers designated by Resorts. Other investors in the MindPlay Entity include Robert Jones, Don Carano, Gene Carano, Gary Carano, Glenn Carano, Gregg Carano, Rhonda Carano, Rob Mouchou, Rick Murdock and Robert B. MacKay, each an affiliate or executive of Resorts, each of whom owns an individual interest in MindPlay, which in the aggregate is 13.6%.who own collectively a 14.1% interest. These individuals acquired their interests in the MindPlay Entity under the same terms and conditions as those of Resorts. At December 31, 2002,2003, Resorts' financial investment in the MindPlay Entity was $1.6 million of which $200,000 was invested in 2002.$0.6 million. The Company's investment in the MindPlay Entity is accounted for using the equity

47



method of accounting. Equity in net loss related to the MindPlay Entity for the year ended December 31, 20022003 of $355,000$511,000 is included as a component of non-operating income.

        In January 2002, the Company guaranteed 54.28% of a working capital line for MindPlay LLC in the amount of $1.0 million. On September 9, 2002, MindPlay increased the line was increased to $1.25 million. This line of credit matures on December 31, 2003. Each draw on the line of credit must be approved byrequired the approval of the president of the MindPlay Entity and Robert Jones, Chief Financial Officer of Resorts. Upon the sale of the assets of the MindPlay Entity described below, the working capital line was paid in full by the purchaser and terminated.

        In 2002, the Company purchased from the MindPlay Entity nine computerized gaming tables for $210,000 which are being used on the casino floor and are enhancing player tracking and casino surveillance. AtIn 2003, the Company paid the MindPlay Entity approximately $4,800 for services relating to the MindPlay tables purchased in 2002. In the opinion of the Company's management, the payments are at least as favorable to the Company as could have been obtained from an unaffiliated third party.

        On February 19, 2004, Alliance Gaming Corp., a New York Stock Exchange listed company ("Alliance"), purchased substantially all of the assets of the MindPlay Entity, consisting primarily of intellectual property, and assumed certain liabilities in the aggregate amount of $2,000,000. The principal amount of liabilities assumed included a $1,250,000 working capital line, 54.28% of which had been guaranteed by Resorts. The consideration received by the MindPlay Entity included $9.0 million in cash, the assumption of $2.0 million of liabilities and promissory notes issued by Alliance in the aggregate principal amount of $4,000,000 which are payable in equal installments after two and four years, respectively, with interest at the rate of 6% per annum. In addition, the MindPlay Entity received options to purchase 100,000 shares of Alliance, common stock, which are exercisable at an exercise price of $24.69 per share. The options, which expire on February 19, 2011, become exercisable as to 50,000 of the shares on February 19, 2006 and as to the balance on February 19, 2008. For a thirteen year period subsequent to the closing date, Alliance will pay the MindPlay Entity royalties, which will be based upon a percentage of gross profit for the first seven years and a percentage of revenue for the remaining six years, from the sale of MindPlay products. Royalty payments totalling at least $1,000,000 over the first two years are guaranteed. The MindPlay Entity has given certain indemnifications to Alliance related to the intellectual property which could ultimately affect the amount of notes collected due to certain offsets and impact the amount of royalties collected. The amount of royalties to be received is subject to a number of future events, the impact of which cannot be determined at this time, thereincluding development of manufacturing, sales and marketing programs by Alliance and the level of acceptance of the relatively new MindPlay product by the gaming industry. On March 8, 2004, the Company received a cash distribution of $1,191,150 from the MindPlay Entity. It is no other device onanticipated that the market withCompany will receive an additional cash distribution of approximately $105,000 by the sophisticated player trackingend of March 2004. Resorts is entitled to receive $600,000 in 2006 from the note and surveillance capabilities thatroyalty proceeds as consideration for termination of a services agreement between Resorts and the MindPlay is offering. The Company's management believes the terms of this purchase were fair although no unaffiliated third party has a product with the sophistication and advanced technology as MindPlay for comparative purposes.Entity.

        The Company from time to time leases an aircraftaircrafts owned by Recreational Enterprises, Inc., for use in operating the Company's business. In 2002,2003, lease payments for the aircraftaircrafts totaled $361,000.$695,000. In the opinion of Resorts'the Company's management, the payments are at least as favorable to Resortsthe Company as could have been obtained from an unaffiliated third party.

        The Company occasionally purchases wine and firewood directly from the Ferrari Carano Winery, which is owned by Recreational Enterprises, Inc. and Donald Carano. The firewood is used in the Eldorado in its various wood burning ovens while wine purchases are sent directly to customers in appreciation of their patronage. In 2003 and 2002, the Company spent approximately $68,000 and $61,000, respectively, for these products. In the opinion of the Company's management, the payments are as least as favorable as could have been obtained from an unaffiliated third party.

48



        In 2003, the Silver Legacy made payments pursuant to the New Joint Venture Agreement, representing tax distributions, to the Company in the amount of $2,025,000. For the year ended December 31, 2003, Resorts made distributions of $2.5 million, utilizing all of the $2,025,000 from the Silver Legacy, to it members for income taxes. We do not anticipate any material distributions to be made or received in regard to income earned in 2003.

        Recreational Enterprises, Inc. is beneficially owned by members of the Carano family and Hotel Casino Management, Inc. is beneficially owned by members of the Poncia family. See Item 12 of this report.

        The Company does not have a compensation committee or other committee of the Board of Managers performing equivalent functions. The compensation paid in 20022003 to each of the Company's Board Members and executive officers was determined by the Chief Executive Officer, and it is anticipated that such compensation will be so determined in the future.

45



Item 12.    Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management.Management and Related Stockholder Matters.

        The following chart illustrates the ownership of Resorts, Capital and the Silver Legacy Joint Venture. Recreational Enterprises, Inc. is beneficially owned by members of the Carano family and Hotel Casino Management, Inc. is beneficially owned by members of the Poncia family. Capital is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Resorts.

4649


        The following table sets forth certain information regarding the beneficial ownership of the Resorts' outstanding membership interests by (i) each person known by Resorts to be a beneficial owner of 5% or more of the outstanding membership interests, (ii) each Board Member, (iii) each of the Named Officers and (iv) all Board Members and executive officers of Resorts as a group.

Name and Address of Beneficial Owner

 Membership
Interest %

 
Donald L. Carano(1)(2) 58.0%
Recreational Enterprises, Inc.(3) 55.0%
Raymond J. Poncia, Jr.(4)(5) 29.0%
Hotel Casino Management, Inc.(5)(6) 29.0%
Hotel Casino Realty Investments, Inc.(7) 6.0%
Gene R. Carano(2)(7)(8) 6.6%
Gregg R. Carano(2)(7)(8) 6.6%
Gary L. Carano(2)(7)(8) 6.6%
Cindy L. Carano(2)(7)(8) 6.6%
Glenn T. Carano(2)(7)(8) 6.6%
Ludwig J. Corrao(9) 5.0%
Robert M. Jones  
Rob B. Mouchou  
Leslie Stone Heisz  
All Board Members and executive officers as a group 95.0%

(1)
Includes 3.0% owned by Mr. Carano individually, 55.0% owned by Recreational Enterprises, Inc., which is owned by members of the Carano family.

(2)
The address of Donald L. Carano, Gene R. Carano, Gregg R. Carano and Cindy L. Carano is c/o Eldorado Resorts LLC, P.O. Box 3399, Reno, Nevada 89505. The address of Gary L. Carano and Glenn T. Carano is c/o Silver Legacy Resort Casino, 407 N. Virginia Street, Reno, Nevada 89501.

(3)
Recreational Enterprises, Inc. is beneficially owned by the following members of the Carano family in the following percentages: Donald L. Carano-49.5%Carano—49.5%; Gene R. Carano-10.1%Carano—10.1%; Gregg R. Carano-10.1%Carano—10.1%; Gary L. Carano-10.1%Carano—10.1%; Cindy L. Carano-10.1%Carano—10.1% and Glenn T. Carano-10.1%Carano—10.1%. Gary holds 7.185% of his interest in Recreational Enterprises, Inc. through various trusts. Gene, Gregg, Cindy and Glenn each hold all of their respective interests in Recreational Enterprises, Inc. through various trusts. The address of Recreational Enterprises, Inc. is P.O. Box 2540, Reno, Nevada 89505.

(4)
Includes 29.0% owned by Hotel Casino Management, Inc., which is owned by members of the Poncia family.

(5)
The address of Raymond J. Poncia, Jr. and Hotel Casino Management, Inc. is P.O. Box 429, Verdi, Nevada 89439.

(6)
Hotel Casino Management, Inc. is beneficially owned by the following members of the Poncia family in the following percentages: Raymond J. Poncia, Jr.-49.712%Jr.—49.712%; Cathy L. Poncia-Vigen-12.572%Poncia-Vigen—12.572%; Linda R. Poncia Ybarra-12.572%Ybarra—12.572%; Michelle L. Poncia Staunton-12.572%Staunton—12.572% and Tammy R. Poncia-12.572%Poncia—12.572%. Cathy, Linda, Michelle and Tammy each hold all of their respective interests in Hotel Casino Management, Inc. through various trusts.

(7)
Hotel Casino Realty Investments, Inc. is beneficially owned by the following members of the Carano and Poncia family in the following percentages: Gary Carano-10%Carano—10%; Glenn Carano-10%Carano—10%; Gene Carano-10%Carano—10%; Gregg Carano-10%; Cindy Carano-10%Carano—10%; Cathy Poncia Vigen-12.5%Vigen—12.5%; Linda Poncia Ybarra-12.5%Ybarra—12.5%; Michelle Poncia Staunton-12.5%Staunton—12.5% and Tammy Poncia-12.5%Poncia—12.5%. All family members

4750


    members hold all of their respective interests in Hotel Casino Realty Investment, Inc. through various trusts. The address of Hotel Casino Realty Investments, Inc. is P.O. Box 429, Verdi, Nevada 89439.

(8)
Membership interest is beneficially owned through such individual's 10.1% ownership of Recreational Enterprises, Inc., 10% ownership of Hotel Casino Realty Investments, Inc. and 0.4% ownership of Resorts held in trust.

(9)
The address of Ludwig J. Corrao is P.O. Box 12907, Reno, Nevada 89510.

Equity Compensation Plans

        The following tables set forth certain information relating to equity compensation plans as of December 31, 20022003 for Resorts and Capital, respectively.

Equity Compensation Plan Information—Resorts

Plan Category

 Number of securities to be
issued upon exercise of
outstanding options, warrants
and rights
(a)

 Weighted average exercise
price of outstanding
options, warrants
and
rights
(b)

 Number of securities
remaining available for
future issuance under
equity compensation plans
(excluding (excluding securities
reflected in column (a))
(c)

Equity compensation plans approved by security holders None  None

Equity compensation plans not approved security holders

 

None

 


 

None

Total

 

None

 


 

None

Equity Compensation Plan Information—Capital

Plan Category

 Number of securities to be
issued upon exercise of
outstanding options, warrants
and rights
(a)

 Weighted average exercise
price of outstanding
options, warrants and
rights
(b)

 Number of securities
remaining available for
future issuance under
equity compensation plans
(excluding (excluding securities
reflected in column (a))
(c)

Equity compensation plans approved by security holders None  None

Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders

 

None

 


 

None

Total

 

None

 


 

None

51



Item 13.    Certain Relationships and Related Transactions.

        Reference is made to the information which appears under the heading "Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation" in Item 11 of this report, which information is incorporated herein by this reference.

48
Item 14.    Principal Accountant Fees and Services.

        The following table presents fees billed for professional services rendered by Deloitte & Touche LLP for fiscal years ended December 31, 2003 and 2002.

 
 2003
 2002
 
Audit fees(a) $101,800 $97,000(e)
Audit-related fees(b)  16,115  3,575 
Tax fees(c)    (f)
Other fees(d)  533  (g)
  
 
 
Total fees $118,448 $100,575(h)
  
 
 

(a)
Audit fees consist of fees billed for professional services rendered for the audit of the Company's annual consolidated financial statements for the fiscal year and reviews of the consolidated financial statements included in the Company's quarterly reports on Form 10-Q for the fiscal year.

(b)
Audit-related fees consist of fees billed for the audit of the Company's 401(k) Plan financial statements. These fees primarily relate to 401(k) audits.

(c)
Tax fees include professional services for tax compliance, tax advice, and tax planning.

(d)
Other fees consist of fees for services other than the services reported under the other named categories.

(e)
Does not include fees paid to Arthur Andersen LLP, our prior auditors, in the amount of $3,500 for the review of the financial statements in the Company's first quarter 2002 Form 10-Q.

(f)
Does not include fees paid to Arthur Andersen LLP, our prior auditors, in the amount of $1,000 for professional tax services in 2002.

(g)
Does not include fees paid to Arthur Andersen LLP, our prior auditors, in the amount of $1,750 for general matters in 2002.

(h)
References made to notes (e), (f) and (g).

        All of the services provided by our auditors for 2003 and 2002 were approved in advance by our Board of Managers.

52




PART IV

Item 14. Controls and Procedures.

        Within the 90-day period prior to the date of this report, the Company carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of the Company's management, including Resorts' and Capital's Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of the Company's disclosure controls and procedures, as defined in Rule 15d-14(c) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the "Exchange Act"). Based upon that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Resorts and Capital concluded that the Company's disclosure controls and procedures are effective in timely making known to them by others within the Company material information relating to the Company (including its consolidated subsidiaries) that is required to be included in the Company's Exchange Act filings.

        There have been no significant changes in the Company's internal controls or in other factors which could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of their evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies or material weaknesses.


Item 15.    Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules and Reports on Form 8-K.

(a)(1) Financial Statements



 

 

Incorporated by reference in Item 8 of this report and included on pages 6162 through 83 hereof are the following consolidated financial statements of Eldorado Resorts LLC:

 

 



Independent Auditors' Report, Deloitte & Touche LLP



 

 

Report of Independent Public Accountants, Arthur Andersen LLP

 

 



Consolidated Balance Sheets at December 31, 20022003 and December 31, 20012002



 

 

Consolidated Statements of Income and Comprehensive Income for the Years Ended December 31, 2003, 2002 2001 and 20002001



 

 

Consolidated Statements of Members' Equity for the Years Ended December 31, 2003, 2002 2001 and 20002001



 

 

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Years Ended December 31, 2003, 2002 2001 and 20002001



 

 

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements



 

 

Incorporated by reference in Item 8 of this report and included on pages 84 through 101103 of this report are the following financial statements of Circus and Eldorado Joint Venture:

 

 



Independent Auditors' Report, Deloitte & Touche LLP



 

 

Report of Independent Public Accountants, Arthur Andersen LLP

 

 



Consolidated Balance Sheets at December 31, 20022003 and December 31, 20012002



 

 

Consolidated Statements of Income for the Years Ended December 31, 2003, 2002 2001 and 20002001

 

 

49



 

 

Consolidated Statements of Partners' Equity for the Years Ended December 31, 2003, 2002 2001 and 20002001



 

 

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Years Ended December 31, 2003, 2002 2001 and 20002001



 

 

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements



(a)(2)

 

Financial Statement Schedules

 

 



Not applicable.applicable



(a)(3)

 

Exhibits:



 

 

The following exhibits are filed as part of this report or incorporated herein by reference:

5053


EXHIBIT
NUMBER

 DESCRIPTION OF EXHIBIT

2.1 Eldorado Resorts LLC Articles of Merger. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 to the Registrants' Form S-4 Registration Statement—Securities and Exchange Commission File No. 333-11811)

2.2

 

Agreement and Plan of Merger dated as of June 28, 1996 by and between Eldorado Hotel Associates Limited Partnership and Eldorado Resorts LLC. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.2 to the Registrants' Form S-4 Registration Statement—Securities and Exchange Commission File No. 333-11811)

3.1

 

Articles of Organization of Eldorado Capital Corp. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Registrants' Form S-4 Registration Statement—Securities and Exchange Commission File No. 333-11811)

3.2

 

Articles of Incorporation of Eldorado Capital Corp. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to the Registrants' Form S-4 Registration Statement—Securities and Exchange Commission File No. 333-11811)

3.3

 

Operating Agreement of Eldorado Resorts LLC dated as of June 28, 1996 by and among Recreational Enterprises Inc., Hotel-Casino Management, Inc., Hotel Casino Realty Investments, Inc., Donald L. Carano and Ludwig J. Corrao. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.3 to the Registrant'sRegistrants' Form S-4 Registration Statement—Securities and Exchange Commission File No. 333-11811)

3.4

 

Bylaws of Eldorado Capital Corp. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.4 to the Registrants' Form S-4 Registration Statement—Securities and Exchange Commission File No. 333-11811)

4.1

 

Indenture dated July 31, 1996 between Eldorado Resorts, Eldorado Capital Corp. and Fleet National Bank, as trustee, and Form of Exchange Note. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Registrants' Form S-4 Registration Statement—Securities and Exchange Commission File No. 333-11811)

4.2

 

Registration Rights Agreement dated as of July 31, 1996 by and among Eldorado Resorts LLC, Eldorado Capital Corp., Bear, Stearns & Co. Inc., Wassertstein Perella Securities, Inc. and BA Securities, Inc. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to the Registrants' Form S-4 Registration Statement—Securities and Exchange Commission File No. 333-11811)

4.3

 

Second Amended and Restated Loan Agreement dated as of June 29, 2001 among Eldorado Resorts LLC and Bank of America, N.A. (formerly Bank of America National Trust and Savings Association), as sole initial Bank, Issuing Bank and Administrative Agent. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.8 to the Registrants' Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2001)

4.4

 

Amendment No. 1 to Second Amended and Restated Loan Agreement, dated as of December 31, 2001, by and among Eldorado Resorts LLC, the banks referred to therein, and Bank of America, N.A., as administrative agent, and related consents of Eldorado Capital Corporation and the lenders. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4 to the Registrants' Form 8-K dated December 31, 2001)

4.5

 

Interest Rate Swap Agreement, dated as of August 6, 2002, by and between Eldorado Resorts LLC and Bank of America, N.A. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Registrants' Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2002)

 

 

 

5154



4.6

 

Termination Agreement of Interest Rate Swap, dated as of October 10, 2002, by and between Eldorado Resorts LLC and Bank of America, N.A. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to the Registrants' Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2002)

4.7

 

Interest Rate Swap Agreement, dated as of November 12, 2002, by and between Eldorado Resorts LLC and Bank of America, N.A. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.7 to the Registrants' Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002)

4.8

 

Termination Agreement of Interest Rate Swap, dated as of February 12, 2003, by and between Eldorado Resorts LLC and Bank of America, N.A. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.8 to the Registrants' Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002)

4.9


Amendment No. 2 to Second Amended and Restated Loan Agreement, dated as of September 10, 2003, by and among Eldorado Resorts LLC, the banks referred to therein, and Bank of America, N.A., as administrative agent, and related consents of Eldorado Capital Corporation and the lenders. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Registrants' Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2003)

4.10


Promissory Note dated as of August 21, 2003, by and between Eldorado Resorts LLC, and the City of Reno. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to the Registrants' Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2003)

10.1.1

 

Agreement of Joint Venture of Circus and Eldorado Joint Venture dated as of March 1, 1994 by and between Eldorado Limited Liability Company and Galleon, Inc. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrants' Form S-4 Registration Statement—Securities and Exchange Commission File No. 333-11811)

10.1.2

 

Amended and Restated Agreement of Joint Venture of Circus and Eldorado Joint Venture by and between Eldorado Limited Liability Company and Galleon, Inc. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1.2 to the Registrants' Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2001)

10.1.3

 

Amended and Restated Agreement of Joint Venture of Circus and Eldorado Joint Venture by and between Eldorado Limited Liability Company and Galleon, Inc. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.3 to the Form S-4 Registration Statement of Circus and Eldorado Joint Venture and Silver Legacy Capital Corp.—Commission File Nos. 333-87202 and 333-87202-01)

10.2.1

 

Management Agreement dated as of June 28, 1996 by and between Eldorado Resorts LLC, Recreational Enterprises, Inc. and Hotel-Casino Management, Inc. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Registrants' Form S-4 Registration Statement—Securities and Exchange Commission File No. 333-11811)

10.2.2

 

Written Consent in Lieu of Meeting of Members of Eldorado Limited Liability Company (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10 to the Registrants' quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 1998)

10.3

 

Indemnity Agreement dated as of July 25, 1996 between Eldorado Resorts LLC and Eldorado Capital Corp. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to the Registrants' Form S-4 Registration Statement��Statement—Securities and Exchange Commission File No. 333-11811)

10.4

 

Purchase Agreement and Joint Escrow Instructions dated June 26, 1996 by and between Daniel's Motor Lodge, Inc. and Eldorado Hotel Associates Limited Partnership. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 to the Registrants' Form S-4 Registration Statement—Securities and Exchange Commission File No. 333-11811)

55



10.5.1

 

Lease dated July 21, 1972 by and between C. S. & Y. Associates and Eldorado Hotel Associates. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.6.1 to the Registrants' Form S-4 Registration Statement—Securities and Exchange Commission File No. 333-11811)

10.5.2

 

Addendum to Lease dated March 20, 1973 by and between C. S. & Y. Associates and Eldorado Hotel Associates. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.6.2 to the Registrants' Form S-4 Registration Statement — Statement—Securities and Exchange Commission File No. 333-11811)



52



10.5.3

 

Amendment to Lease dated January 1, 1978 by and between C. S. & Y. Associates and Eldorado Hotel Associates. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.6.3 to the Registrants' Form S-4 Registration Statement — Statement—Securities and Exchange Commission File No. 333-11811)

10.5.4

 

Amendment to Lease dated January 31, 1985 by and between C. S. & Y. Associates and Eldorado Hotel Associates. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.6.4 to the Registrants' Form S-4 Registration Statement — Statement—Securities and Exchange Commission File No. 333-11811)

10.5.5

 

Third Amendment to Lease dated December 24, 1987 by and between C. S. & Y. Associates and Eldorado Hotel Associates. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.6.5 to the Registrants' Form S-4 Registration Statement—Securities and Exchange Commission File No. 333-11811)

10.6*

 

Eldorado Hotel Associates Limited Partnership 1995 Performance and Appreciation Rights Plan effective January 1, 1995. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.7 to the Registrants' Form S-4 Registration Statement—Securities and Exchange Commission File No. 333-11811)333-11811.)

10.7*

 

Eldorado Hotel Casino Deferred Compensation Plan effective January 1, 1990. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.8 to the Registrants' Form S-4 Registration Statement—Securities and Exchange Commission File No. 333-11811)333-11811.)

10.8*

 

Eldorado Hotel Casino Deferred Compensation Plan Trust Agreement dated December 1, 1990 by and between Eldorado Hotel Associates Limited Partnership and Donald L. Carano. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.9 to the Registrants' Form S-4 Registration Statement—Securities and Exchange Commission File No. 333-11811)333-11811.)

10.9.1

 

Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated November 24, 1997, by and among Circus and Eldorado Joint Venture, the Banks named therein and Bank of America National Trust and Savings Association as Administrative Agent, and the related Note, Amended and Restated Make-Well Agreement and Amended and Restated Deed of Trust. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4 (h)4(h) to the quarterly report for the quarterly period ended October 31, 1997 of Circus Circus Enterprises, Inc. (Mandalay Resort Group) (Commission File No. 1-8570)

10.9.2

 

Second Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated as of March 5, 2002, among Circus and Eldorado Joint Venture, the banks referred to therein and Bank of America, N.A., as administrative agent. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.9.2 to the Registrants' Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2001)

10.9.3

 

Guaranty dated as of March 5, 2002, made by Silver Legacy Capital Corp., in favor of Bank of America, N.A., as administrative agent. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.9.3 to the Registrants' Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2001)

10.9.4

 

Second Amended and Restated Security Agreement, dated as of March 5, 2002, by and between Circus and Eldorado Joint Venture and Bank of America, N.A., as administrative agent. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.9.4 to the Registrants' Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2001)

 

 

 

5356



10.9.5

 

Guarantor Security Agreement, dated as of March 5, 2002, by and between Silver Legacy Capital Corp. and Bank of America, N.A., as administrative agent. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.9.5 to the Registrants' Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2001)

10.9.6

 

Second Amended and Restated Deed of Trust, dated as of February 26, 2002, but effective March 5, 2002, by and among Circus and Eldorado Joint Venture and Bank of America, N.A., as administrative agent. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.9.6 to the Registrants' Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2001)

10.9.7

 

Second Amended and Restated Assignment of Rent and Revenues entered into as of February 26, 2002, but effective as of March 5, 2002, by and between Circus and Eldorado Joint Venture and Bank of America, N.A., as administrative agent. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.9.7 to the Registrants' Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2001)

10.9.8

 

Second Amended and Restated Collateral Account Agreement, dated March 5, 2002, by and between Circus and Eldorado Joint Venture and Bank of America, N.A., as administrative agent. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.9.8 to the Registrants' Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2001)

10.9.9

 

Intercreditor Agreement, dated as of March 5, 2002, by and among Bank of America, N.A., as administrative agent, The Bank of New York, as trustee, Circus and Eldorado Joint Venture and Silver Legacy Capital Corp. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.9.9 to the Registrants' Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2001)

10.10.1

 

Indenture, dated as of March 5, 2002, among Circus and Eldorado Joint Venture, Silver Legacy Capital Corp., and The Bank of New York, as trustee. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.10.1 to the Registrants' Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2001)

10.10.2

 

Deed of Trust, dated as of February 26, 2002, by Circus and Eldorado Joint Venture, to First American Title Company of Nevada for the benefit of the Bank of New York. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.10.2 to the Registrants' Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2001)

10.10.3

 

Security Agreement, dated as of March 5, 2002, by and between Circus and Eldorado Joint Venture and Silver Legacy Corp. for the benefit of The Bank of New York, as trustee. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.10.3 to the Registrants' Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2001)

10.10.4

 

Assignment of Rent and Revenues entered into as of February 26, 2002, by and between Circus and Eldorado Joint Venture and The Bank of New York, as trustee. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.10.4 to the Registrants' Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2001)

10.10.5

 

Collateral Account Agreement, dated as of March 5, 2002, by and among Circus and Eldorado Joint Venture, Silver Legacy Capital Corp., and The Bank of New York, as trustee. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.10.5 to the Registrants' Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2001)

10.10.6

 

Environmental Indemnity Agreement entered into as of March 5, 2002, by Circus and Eldorado Joint Venture and Silver Legacy Capital Corp. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.10.6 to the Registrants' Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2001)



54



10.11

 

Operating Agreement of Tamarack Crossings LLC dated as of December 13, 2000 by and among Eldorado Resorts LLC, The Robert and Nana Sullivan Family Trust, Robert E. Armstrong, Donald L. Carano and Patrick C. Sullivan. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.12 to the Registrants' Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2000)

57



10.12

 

Operating Agreement of MindPlay LLC dated as of July 1, 2000 by and among Eldorado Resorts LLC, Avereon Research LTD. and others, and Amendment thereto. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.13 to the Registrants' Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2000)

10.13

 

Articles of Merger dated May 31, 2001 by and between Tamarack Partners, LLC and Tamarack Crossings, LLC. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.14 to the Registrants' Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2001)

10.14

 

Unit Option Agreement dated June 29, 2001 by and among The Robert and Nana Sullivan Family Trust and Eldorado Resorts LLC. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.15 to the Registrants' Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2001)

10.15

 

First Amendment to Operating Agreement of Tamarack Crossings, LLC dated as of June 29, 2001 by and among Eldorado Resorts LLC, The Robert and Nana Sullivan Family Trust, Robert G. Armstrong, Donald L. Carano and Patrick C. Sullivan. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.16 to the Registrants' Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2001)

16

 

Letter from Arthur Andersen LLP. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 16 to the Registrant's Form 8-K dated May 24, 2002)

21

 

List of Subsidiaries.

99.131.1

 

Certification of Donald L. Carano, Chief Executive Officer of Resorts and Capital

99.231.2

 

Certification of Robert M. Jones, Chief Financial Officer of Resorts

99.331.3

 

Certification of Gene R. Carano, Chief Financial Officer of Capital

32.1


Certification of Donald L. Carano pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350

32.2


Certification of Robert M. Jones pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350

32.3


Certification of Gene R. Carano pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350

*
Constitutes a management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement.

(b)
Reports on Form 8-K

    During the fourth quarter of 2002,2003, the Company filed no report on Form 8-K.

(c)
The exhibits required by Item 601 of Regulation S-K filed as part of this report or incorporated herein by reference are listed in Item 1514 (a)(3) above, and the exhibits filed herewith are listed on the Index to Exhibits which accompanies this report

(d)
See Item 15 (a)(2) of this report.

5558



SIGNATURES

        Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrants have duly caused this report to be signed on their behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

  ELDORADO RESORTS LLC

Date: March 27, 200324, 2004

 

By:

/s/  
DONALD L. CARANO      
Donald L. Carano
Chief Executive Officer, President and
Presiding Manager

 

 

ELDORADO CAPITAL CORP.

Date: March 27, 200324, 2004

 

By:

/s/  
DONALD L. CARANO      
Donald L. Carano
President

        Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrants and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

Signature
 Title
 Date

 

 

 

 

 
/s/  DONALD L. CARANO      
Donald L. Carano
 Chief Executive Officer, President and Presiding Manager of the Board of Managers of Eldorado Resorts LLC (Principal Executive Officer) and President (Principal Executive Officer) and Director of Eldorado Capital Corp. March 27, 200324, 2004

/s/  
ROBERT M. JONES      
Robert M. Jones

 

Chief Financial Officer of Eldorado Resorts LLC (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)

 

March 27, 200324, 2004

/s/  
GENE R. CARANO      
Gene R. Carano

 

Treasurer of Eldorado Capital Corp. (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)

 

March 27, 200324, 2004

59



/s/  
RAYMOND J. PONCIA, JR.      
Raymond J. Poncia, Jr.

 

Member of the Board of Managers of Eldorado Resorts LLC—appointed by Hotel Casino Management, Inc. as its corporate representative and Director of Eldorado Capital Corp.

 

March 27, 200324, 2004





56



/s/  
GARY L. CARANO      
Gary L. Carano

 

Member of the Board of Managers of Eldorado Resorts LLC—appointed by Recreational Enterprises, Inc. as its corporate representative

 

March 27, 200324, 2004

/s/  
GREGG R. CARANO      
Gregg R. Carano

 

Director of Eldorado Capital Corp.

 

March 27, 200324, 2004

/s/  
LESLIE STONE HEISZ      
Leslie Stone Heisz

 

Member of the Board of Managers of Eldorado Resorts LLC

 

March 27, 200324, 2004

57


CERTIFICATIONS

        I, Donald L. Carano, Chief Executive Officer, President and Presiding Manager of the Board of Managers of Eldorado Resorts LLC and President of Eldorado Capital Corp., certify that:

(1)I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Eldorado Resorts LLC and Eldorado Capital Corp. (collectively, the "registrant");

(2)


Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report;

(3)


Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

(4)


The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:



a)


designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;



b)


evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this annual report (the "Evaluation Date"); and



c)


presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

(5)


The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):



a)


all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize, and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and



b)


any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and

(6)


The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this annual report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Date:


March 27, 2003



By:


/s/  
DONALD L. CARANO      
Donald L. Carano
Chief Executive Officer, President and
Presiding Manager of Eldorado Resorts LLC
and President of Eldorado Capital Corp.


5860


        I, Robert M. Jones, Chief Financial Officer of Eldorado Resorts LLC, certify that:

(1)I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Eldorado Resorts LLC and Eldorado Capital Corp. (collectively, the "registrant");

(2)


Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report;

(3)


Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

(4)


The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:



a)


designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;



b)


evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this annual report (the "Evaluation Date"); and



c)


presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

(5)


The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):



a)


all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize, and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and



b)


any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and

(6)


The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this annual report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Date:


March 27, 2003



By:


/s/  
ROBERT M. JONES      
Robert M. Jones
Chief Financial Officer of Eldorado Resorts LLC


59


        I, Gene R. Carano, Chief Financial Officer of Eldorado Capital Corp., certify that:

(1)I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Eldorado Resorts LLC and Eldorado Capital Corp. (collectively, the "registrant");

(2)


Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report;

(3)


Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

(4)


The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:



a)


designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;



b)


evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this annual report (the "Evaluation Date"); and



c)


presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

(5)


The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):



a)


all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize, and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and



b)


any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and

(6)


The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this annual report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Date:


March 27, 2003



By:


/s/  
GENE R. CARANO      
Gene R. Carano
Chief Financial Officer of Eldorado Capital Corp.


    SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION TO BE FURNISHED WITH REPORTS FILED PURSUANT TO SECTION 15(d) OF THE ACT BY REGISTRANTS WHICH HAVE NOT REGISTERED SECURITIES PURSUANT TO SECTION 12 OF THIS ACT.

        Other than copies of its annual reports filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on Form 10-K, the registrants do not provide annual reports to their security holders, and no proxy soliciting material has been sent, or is currently anticipated to be sent, to securities holders.

6061



INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF ELDORADO RESORTS LLC

 
 Page
Independent Auditors' Report, Deloitte & Touche LLP 6263

Report of Independent Public Accountants, Arthur Andersen LLP

 

6364

Consolidated Balance Sheets

 

6465

Consolidated Statements of Income and Comprehensive Income

 

6566

Consolidated Statements of Members' Equity

 

6667

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

 

6768

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

 

6869

6162



INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT

To the Members of Eldorado Resorts LLC:

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheetsheets of Eldorado Resorts LLC and subsidiaries (the "Company") as of December 31, 2003 and 2002, and the related consolidated statements of income, and comprehensive income, members' equity, and cash flows for the yearyears then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audit.audits. The consolidated financial statements of the Company as of December 31, 2001 and for the yearsyear ended December 31, 2001 and 2000 were audited by other auditors who have ceased operations. Those auditors expressed an unqualified opinion on those financial statements in their report dated March 5, 2002.

We conducted our auditaudits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit providesaudits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the 2002such consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Eldorado Resorts LLC and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2003 and 2002, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for the yearyears then ended, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

Reno, Nevada
March 7, 200322, 2004

6263


This is a copy of the report previously issued by Arthur Andersen LLP. The report has not been reissued by Arthur Andersen LLP nor has Arthur Andersen LLP provided a consent to the inclusion of its report in this annual report on Form 10-K.


REPORT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

To the Members of Eldorado Resorts LLC:

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of ELDORADO RESORTS LLC, a Nevada limited liability company and subsidiaries (the "Company"), as of December 31, 2001 and 2000, and the related consolidated statements of income and comprehensive income, members' equity and cash flows for the three years then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Eldorado Resorts LLC and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2001 and 2000, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for the three years then ended in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States.

ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP

Las Vegas, Nevada
March 5, 2002

6364



ELDORADO RESORTS LLC

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(dollars in thousands)

 
 December 31,
 
 2002
 2001
ASSETS      

CURRENT ASSETS:

 

 

 

 

 

 
 Cash and cash equivalents $8,135 $9,910
 Restricted cash  152  306
 Accounts receivable, net  3,148  3,589
 Inventories  2,449  2,722
 Prepaid expenses  2,190  1,392
  
 
  Total current assets  16,074  17,919

INVESTMENT IN JOINT VENTURES

 

 

64,149

 

 

72,073

PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT, net

 

 

130,354

 

 

139,966

OTHER ASSETS, net

 

 

7,067

 

 

7,503
  
 
  Total assets $217,644 $237,461
  
 
LIABILITIES AND MEMBERS' EQUITY      

CURRENT LIABILITIES:

 

 

 

 

 

 
 Current portion of long-term debt $344 $315
 Current portion of capital lease obligations  112  83
 Accounts payable  4,190  3,388
 Interest payable  3,372  3,966
 Accrued and other liabilities  7,267  6,639
 Due to members and affiliates  238  417
  
 
  Total current liabilities  15,523  14,808

LONG-TERM DEBT, less current portion

 

 

84,691

 

 

112,941

CAPITAL LEASE OBLIGATIONS, less current portion

 

 

63

 

 

143

OTHER LIABILITIES

 

 

634

 

 

1,417
  
 
  Total liabilities  100,911  129,309
  
 
MINORITY INTEREST  5,638  5,948

COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES (Notes 11 and 12)

 

 

 

 

 

 

MEMBERS' EQUITY

 

 

111,095

 

 

102,204
  
 
  Total liabilities and members' equity $217,644 $237,461
  
 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated statements.

64



ELDORADO RESORTS LLC

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
(dollars in thousands)

 
 For the years ended December 31,
 
 
 2002
 2001
 2000
 
OPERATING REVENUES:          
 Casino $94,355 $97,726 $113,613 
 Food, beverage and entertainment  44,603  46,428  50,806 
 Hotel  16,372  17,427  18,005 
 Other  5,398  5,334  5,508 
  
 
 
 
   160,728  166,915  187,932 
 Less—promotional allowances  (17,866) (17,592) (17,612)
  
 
 
 
  Net operating revenues  142,862  149,323  170,320 
  
 
 
 
OPERATING EXPENSES:          
 Casino  49,032  50,172  53,112 
 Food, beverage and entertainment  31,077  32,040  34,791 
 Hotel  6,839  7,465  8,005 
 Other  2,091  1,928  3,151 
 Selling, general and administrative  27,656  27,878  30,349 
 Management fees  48  1,201  1,790 
 Depreciation  11,798  12,957  13,439 
  
 
 
 
  Total operating expenses  128,541  133,641  144,637 
  
 
 
 
EQUITY IN INCOME OF UNCONSOLIDATED AFFILIATES  8,967  10,412  11,935 
  
 
 
 
OPERATING INCOME  23,288  26,094  37,618 
  
 
 
 
OTHER INCOME (EXPENSE)          
 Equity in loss of unconsolidated affiliate  (355) (207)  
 Interest rate swap income  1,076     
 Gain (Loss) on investments    (225) 60 
 Interest expense, net  (10,204) (11,810) (13,016)
  
 
 
 
  Total other income (expense)  (9,483) (12,242) (12,956)
  
 
 
 
INCOME BEFORE MINORITY INTEREST  13,805  13,852  24,662 

MINORITY INTEREST

 

 

(319

)

 

(403

)

 

(455

)
  
 
 
 
NET INCOME  13,486  13,449  24,207 

UNREALIZED GAIN/(LOSS) ON SECURITIES:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
 Unrealized holding loss arising during period      (1,123)
 Reclassification of amount included in net income      1,123 
  
 
 
 
COMPREHENSIVE INCOME $13,486 $13,449 $24,207 
  
 
 
 
 
 December 31,
 
 2003
 2002
ASSETS

CURRENT ASSETS:

 

 

 

 

 

 
 Cash and cash equivalents $7,362 $8,135
 Restricted cash  210  152
 Accounts receivable, net  3,014  3,148
 Inventories  2,054  2,449
 Prepaid expenses  2,155  2,190
  
 
  Total current assets  14,795  16,074

INVESTMENT IN JOINT VENTURES

 

 

66,738

 

 

64,149

PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT, net

 

 

128,859

 

 

130,354

OTHER ASSETS, net

 

 

4,785

 

 

7,067
  
 
  Total assets $215,177 $217,644
  
 

LIABILITIES AND MEMBERS' EQUITY

CURRENT LIABILITIES:

 

 

 

 

 

 
 Current portion of long-term debt $355 $344
 Current portion of capital lease obligations  84  112
 Accounts payable  5,996  4,190
 Interest payable  2,556  3,372
 Accrued and other liabilities  6,488  7,267
 Due to members and affiliates  230  238
  
 
  Total current liabilities  15,709  15,523

LONG-TERM DEBT, less current portion

 

 

77,890

 

 

84,691

CAPITAL LEASE OBLIGATIONS, less current portion

 

 

17

 

 

63

OTHER LIABILITIES

 

 

638

 

 

634
  
 
  Total liabilities  94,254  100,911

MINORITY INTEREST

 

 

5,742

 

 

5,638

COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES (Notes 11 and 12)

 

 

 

 

 

 

MEMBERS' EQUITY

 

 

115,181

 

 

111,095
  
 
  Total liabilities and members' equity $215,177 $217,644
  
 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated statements.

65



ELDORADO RESORTS LLC

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF MEMBERS' EQUITYINCOME
(dollars in thousands)

BALANCE, December 31, 1999 $79,777 
 Distributions  (8,110)
 Net Income  24,207 
 Comprehensive Income  (1,123)
  
 
BALANCE, December 31, 2000  94,751 
 Distributions  (5,996)
 Net Income  13,449 
  
 
BALANCE, December 31, 2001  102,204 
 Distributions  (4,595)
 Net Income  13,486 
  
 
BALANCE, December 31, 2002 $111,095 
  
 
 
 For the years ended December 31,
 
 
 2003
 2002
 2001
 
OPERATING REVENUES:          
 Casino $86,972 $94,355 $97,726 
 Food, beverage and entertainment  42,195  44,603  46,428 
 Hotel  16,499  16,372  17,427 
 Other  5,525  5,398  5,334 
  
 
 
 
   151,191  160,728  166,915 
 Less—promotional allowances  (18,234) (17,866) (17,592)
  
 
 
 
  Net operating revenues  132,957  142,862  149,323 
  
 
 
 
OPERATING EXPENSES:          
 Casino  47,400  49,032  50,172 
 Food, beverage and entertainment  28,750  31,077  32,040 
 Hotel  6,809  6,839  7,465 
 Other  1,522  2,091  1,928 
 Selling, general and administrative  26,756  27,656  27,878 
 Management fees  295  48  1,201 
 Depreciation  11,219  11,798  12,957 
  
 
 
 
  Total operating expenses  122,751  128,541  133,641 
  
 
 
 
EQUITY IN INCOME OF UNCONSOLIDATED AFFILIATES  5,613  8,967  10,412 
  
 
 
 
OPERATING INCOME  15,819  23,288  26,094 
  
 
 
 
OTHER INCOME (EXPENSE)          
 Equity in loss of unconsolidated affiliate  (511) (355) (207)
 Interest rate swap income (loss)  (163) 1,076   
 Gain (Loss) on bond repurchases  (578) 50  343 
 Loss on investments      (225)
 Gain on sale of land  906     
 Interest expense, net  (8,706) (10,254) (12,153)
  
 
 
 
  Total other income (expense)  (9,052) (9,483) (12,242)
  
 
 
 
INCOME BEFORE MINORITY INTEREST  6,767  13,805  13,852 

MINORITY INTEREST

 

 

(181

)

 

(319

)

 

(403

)
  
 
 
 
NET INCOME $6,586 $13,486 $13,449 
  
 
 
 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated statements.

66



ELDORADO RESORTS LLC

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWSMEMBERS' EQUITY
(dollars in thousands)

 
 For the years ended December 31,
 
 
 2002
 2001
 2000
 
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:          
 Net income $13,486 $13,449 $24,207 
 Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:          
  Depreciation  11,798  12,957  13,439 
  Amortization of debt issue costs  438  591  665 
  Equity in income of unconsolidated affiliates  (8,967) (10,412) (11,935)
  Minority interest  319  403  455 
  (Gain) Loss on sale of property and equipment  282  (12) (6)
 (Increase) Decrease in—          
  Restricted cash  154  (306)  
  Accounts receivable, net  712  877  199 
  Inventories  273  574  65 
  Prepaid expenses  (798) 255  113 
 (Decrease) Increase in-          
  Accounts payable, interest payable, accrued and other liabilities, due to members and affiliates and other liabilities  (126) (2,397) 465 
  
 
 
 
  Net cash provided by operating activities  17,571  15,979  27,667 
  
 
 
 
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:          
  Purchases of property and equipment  (4,861) (6,364) (7,763)
  Proceeds from sale of marketable securities      1,176 
  Gain on sale of marketable securities      (60)
  Increase in joint venture investments  (200) (4,070) (755)
  Increase in investment    (225)  
  Equity in loss of unconsolidated affiliate  355  207   
  Loss on investment    225   
  Interest rate swap receivable  (271)    
  Proceeds from sale of property and equipment  2,393  12  152 
  Distributions from unconsolidated affiliates  16,736  4,565   
  Minority interest in distributions  (629) (174)  
  Increase (Decrease) in other assets, net  (125) 29  2 
  
 
 
 
  Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities  13,398  (5,795) (7,248)
  
 
 
 
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:          
  Proceeds from long-term debt and capital leases  27,049  34,013  18,000 
  Principal payments on long-term debt and capital leases  (48,166) (27,412) (29,947)
  Payment on bond repurchases  (6,982) (9,597)  
  Gain on bond repurchases, net of unamortized loan fees  (50) (343)  
  Loan origination costs    (306)  
  Distributions  (4,595) (5,996) (8,110)
  
 
 
 
  Net cash used in financing activities  (32,744) (9,641) (20,057)
  
 
 
 
INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS  (1,775) 543  362 
 
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT BEGINNING OF YEAR

 

 

9,910

 

 

9,367

 

 

9,005

 
  
 
 
 
 CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT END OF YEAR $8,135 $9,910 $9,367 
  
 
 
 
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION:          
 Cash paid during year for interest, net of amounts capitalized $11,239 $12,201 $12,326 
  
 
 
 

BALANCE, January 1, 2001

 

$

94,751

 
 Distributions  (5,996)
 Net Income  13,449 
  
 

BALANCE, December 31, 2001

 

 

102,204

 
 Distributions  (4,595)
 Net Income  13,486 
  
 

BALANCE, December 31, 2002

 

 

111,095

 
 Distributions  (2,500)
 Net Income  6,586 
  
 

BALANCE, December 31, 2003

 

$

115,181

 
  
 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated statements.

67



ELDORADO RESORTS LLC

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(dollars in thousands)

 
 For the years ended December 31,
 
 
 2003
 2002
 2001
 
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:          
 Net income $6,586 $13,486 $13,449 
 Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:          
  Depreciation  11,219  11,798  12,957 
  Amortization of debt issue costs  377  438  591 
  Loss (Gain) on bond repurchases  578  (50) (343)
  Equity in income of unconsolidated affiliates  (5,102) (8,612) (10,205)
  Minority interest  181  319  403 
  (Gain) Loss on sale of property and equipment  (2) 282  (12)
  Gain on sale of land  (906)    
  Interest rate swap loss (income)  163  (1,076)  
 (Increase) Decrease in—          
  Restricted cash  (58) 154  (306)
  Accounts receivable, net  (29) 1,517  877 
  Inventories  395  273  574 
  Prepaid expenses  35  (798) 255 
 (Decrease) Increase in—          
  Accounts payable  1,806  629  (1,806)
  Interest payable  (816) (594) (146)
  Accrued and other liabilities and due to members and affiliates  (783) (161) (445)
  
 
 
 
  Net cash provided by operating activities  13,644  17,605  15,843 
  
 
 
 
  CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:          
  Purchases of property and equipment  (9,917) (4,861) (6,364)
  Increase in joint venture investments    (200) (4,070)
  Increase in investment      (225)
  Loss on investment      225 
  Proceeds from sale of property and equipment  197  2,393  12 
  Distributions from unconsolidated affiliates  2,514  16,736  4,565 
  Minority interest in distributions  (77) (629) (174)
  Increase (Decrease) in other assets, net  102  (125) 29 
  Proceeds from sale of land  2,463     
  
 
 
 
  Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities  (4,718) 13,314  (6,002)
  
 
 
 
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:          
  Proceeds from long-term debt and capital leases  50,297  27,049  34,013 
  Principal payments on long-term debt and capital leases  (38,715) (48,166) (27,412)
  Payment on bond repurchases  (18,781) (6,982) (9,597)
  Loan origination costs      (306)
  Distributions  (2,500) (4,595) (5,996)
  
 
 
 
  Net cash used in financing activities  (9,699) (32,694) (9,298)
  
 
 
 
INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS  (773) (1,775) 543 
 
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT BEGINNING OF YEAR

 

 

8,135

 

 

9,910

 

 

9,367

 
  
 
 
 
 CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT END OF YEAR $7,362 $8,135 $9,910 
  
 
 
 
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION:          
 Cash paid during year for interest, net of amounts capitalized $9,107 $11,239 $12,201 
  
 
 
 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated statements.

68



ELDORADO RESORTS LLC

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

1.     Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

    Principles of Consolidation/Operations

        The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Eldorado Resorts, LLC ("Resorts"), a Nevada limited liability company, Eldorado Capital Corp. ("Capital"), a Nevada Corporation and wholly-owned subsidiary of Resorts, and a majority owned subsidiary, Eldorado Limited Liability Company ("ELLC") and, for the period prior to July 1, 1996, Resorts' Predecessor, Eldorado Hotel Associates Limited Partnership (the "Predecessor Partnership") (together, the "Company"). All significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.

        The Company shall be liquidated upon the occurrence of any event requiring dissolution of the Company. Proceeds from liquidation shall be dispersed first to creditors, including Members and interest holders who are creditors for debts other than their respective capital contributions, and second to Members and interest holders in accordance with their capital account balances.

        The Company owns and operates the Eldorado Hotel & Casino, an 816-room hotel casino in downtown Reno, Nevada. ELLC, a Nevada limited liability company owned 96.12% by Resorts, owns a 50% interest in the Circus and Eldorado Joint Venture which owns the Silver Legacy Resort Casino, a 1,710 room hotel casino that opened July 28, 1995 and is located contiguous to the Eldorado Hotel & Casino.

        Capital was incorporated with the sole purpose of serving as co-issuer of the 101/2% Senior Subordinated Notes due 2006 (the "Notes") in order to facilitate the offering thereof. Capital does not have any operations, assets or revenues.

    Use of Estimates

        The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

    Cash and Cash Equivalents

        Cash and cash equivalents include investments purchased with an original maturity of 90 days or less.

    Restricted Cash

        The Company has a certificate of deposit for $152,000,$210,000, which is used for security with the Nevada Department of Insurance for its self-insured workers compensation. The certificate of deposit has a maturity date of July 25, 2003.26, 2004.

    Inventories

        Inventories are stated at the lower of cost, using a first-in, first-out basis, or market value.market.

68


    Property and Equipment

        Property and equipment are stated at cost. Depreciation is computed using the straight-line method over the estimated useful life of the asset or the term of the capitalized lease, whichever is less.

69


Costs of major improvements are capitalized, while costs of normal repairs and maintenance are charged to expense as incurred.

    Capitalization of Interest

        The Company capitalizes interest on funds disbursed during the active construction and development phases of its facilities and other major projects. Interest capitalized during the fiscal years ended December 31, 2003, 2002, 2001 2000 was approximately $0, $103,000 $132,000 and $105,000,$132,000, respectively.

    Investment in Joint Ventures

        The Company accounts for ELLC's 50% joint venture interest in the Silver Legacy Joint Venture and its 21.25% interest in Tamarack using the equity method of accounting and is reported as a component of operating income, sinceaccounting. Since the Company operates in the same line of business as the Silver Legacy and Tamarack, each with casino and/or hotel operations, the Company's equity in the income of such joint ventures is included in operating income. The Company accounts for its 19%18% interest in MindPlay under the equity method of accounting and is reported as a component of non-operating income, sinceaccounting. Since MindPlay, which is engaged in the development ofproduces a system that if successfully completed, will permitpermits tracking and surveillance of pit gaming activities, operates in a dissimilar line of business, the Company's equity in the loss of such joint venture is included in non-operating income.

    Long-Lived Assets

        Long-lived assets are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. In accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards ("SFAS") No. 144, "Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets", an estimate of undiscounted future cash flows produced by the asset is compared to its carrying value to determine whether an impairment exists. If it is determined that the asset is impaired based on expected future cash flows, a loss, measured by the amount by which the carrying amount of the asset exceeds the fair value of the asset, would be recognized.

    Self Insurance

        The Company is self-insured for various levels of general liability, workers' compensation, and employee medical insurance coverage. Self-insurance reserves are estimated based on the Company's claims experience and are included in accrued expenses on the consolidated balance sheets.

    Casino Revenue and Promotional Allowances

        In accordance with industry practice, the Company recognizes as casino revenue the net win from gaming activities, which is the difference between gaming wins and losses. The retail value of food, beverage, rooms and other services furnished to customers on a complimentary basis is included in gross revenue and then deducted as promotional allowances.

69


        The retail value of complimentaries included in promotional allowances is as follows (in thousands):


 For the years ended
December 31,

 For the years ended December 31,

 2002
 2001
 2000
 2003
 2002
 2001
Food, beverage and entertainment $11,119 $11,713 $12,121 $10,864 $11,119 $11,713
Hotel 4,696 4,110 4,228 4,837 4,696 4,110
Other 2,051 1,769 1,263 2,533 2,051 1,769
 
 
 
 
 
 
 $17,866 $17,592 $17,612 $18,234 $17,866 $17,592
 
 
 
 
 
 

70


        The cost of providing such complimentary services is charged to operating expenses in the casino department. Such costs of providing complimentary services are as follows (in thousands):


 For the years ended
December 31,

 For the years ended December 31,

 2002
 2001
 2000
 2003
 2002
 2001
Food, beverage and entertainment $9,274 $9,824 $10,123 $9,044 $9,274 $9,824
Hotel 2,227 1,914 1,932 2,223 2,227 1,914
Other 1,684 1,470 1,030 2,037 1,684 1,470
 
 
 
 
 
 
 $13,185 $13,208 $13,085 $13,304 $13,185 $13,208
 
 
 
 
 
 

    Advertising

        Advertising costs are expensed in the period the advertising initially takes place. Advertising costs included in selling, general and administrative expenses were $3,457,000, $4,035,000, $3,946,000 and $4,523,000$3,946,000 for the years ended December 31, 2003, 2002 2001 and 2000,2001, respectively.

    Bond Repurchases

        In October 2001, the Company purchased $10.2 million principal amount of its 101/2% Notes on the open market. The Company borrowed $9.7 million under its New Credit Facility to facilitate the purchase. The Notes were purchased at a discount resulting in a gain of $343,000 after writing off unamortized fees relating to the bond offering.

        In June 2002, the Company purchased $2.0 million principal amount of its 101/2% Notes on the open market. The Company borrowed $1.5 million under its New Credit Facility to facilitate the purchase. The Notes were purchased at a discount resulting in a gain of $35,000 after writing off unamortized fees relating to the bond offering.

        In August 2002, the Company purchased $5.2 million principal amount of its 101/2% Notes on the open market. The Company borrowed $3.0 million under its New Credit Facility to facilitate the purchase. The Notes were purchased at a discount resulting in a gain of $15,500 after writing off unamortized fees relating to the bond offering.

        In January 2003, the Company purchased $7.9 million principal amount of its 101/2% Notes on the open market. The Company borrowed $8.0 million under its New Credit Facility to facilitate the purchase. The Notes were purchased at a premium resulting in a loss of $266,000 after writing off unamortized fees relating to the bond offering.

        In September 2003, the Company purchased $1.75 million principal amount of its 101/2% Notes on the open market. The Company borrowed $2.0 million under its New Credit Facility to facilitate the purchase. The Notes were purchased at a premium resulting in a loss of $54,000 after writing off unamortized fees relating to the bond offering.

        Pursuant to notice given on October 3, 2003, to the trustee under the indenture relating to our 101/2% Notes, we redeemed $8.8 million principal amount of the 101/2% Notes on November 7, 2003 at a price of 101.75% of the principal amount. The Company borrowed $8.5 million under its New Credit Facility to facilitate the partial redemption. The partial redemption resulted in a loss of $258,000 after writing off unamortized fees relating to the bond offering.

    Federal Income Taxes

        The Predecessor Partnership was not subject to income taxes; therefore, no provision for income taxes was made as the Partners included their respective shares of partnership income in their income tax returns. As a limited liability company, Resorts is not subject to income tax liability. Therefore,

71


holders of membership interests will include their respective shares of Resorts' taxable income in their income tax returns and Resorts will continue to make distributions for such tax liabilities.

70


        The Operating Agreement of Eldorado Resorts LLC dated June 28, 1996 obligates Resorts to distribute each year, for as long as it is not taxed as a corporation, to each of its members an amount equal to such member's allocable share of the taxable income of Resorts multiplied by the highest marginal combined Federal, state and local income tax rate applicable to individuals for that year.

        The reported amounts of the Company's assets and liabilities exceeded the net tax basis by $961,000$2,658,000 and $1,871,000$961,000 at December 31, 20022003 and 2001,2002, respectively.

    Fair Value of Financial Instruments

        The approximate fair market value of the 101/2% Senior Subordinated Notes, including those held by the Company, based on quoted market prices, were approximately $100.0$102.3 million and $96.0$100.0 million at December 31, 20022003 and 2001,2002, respectively. The fair values are not necessarily indicative of the amounts the Company could realize in a current market exchange.

    Marketable Securities

        The Company accounts for its marketable securities in accordance with Because the provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 115, "Accounting for Certain Investments in Debt and Equity Securities" ("SFAS No. 115"). This standard requires that certain debt and equity securities be adjustedNew Credit Facility is tied to market rates of interest, its carrying value at the end of each accounting period. This standard also requires marketable securities to be classified into one of three categories: (1) trading (2) available-for-sale and (3) held-to maturity. Management determines the proper classifications of investments at the time of purchase and reevaluates such designations as of each balance sheet date.

    Comprehensive Incomeapproximates market value.

        Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 130 ("SFAS No. 130"), "Reporting Comprehensive Income", requires that the Company disclose comprehensive income and its components. The objective of SFAS No. 130 is to report a measure of all changes in equity of a company that result from transactions and other economic events of the period other than transactions with members. Comprehensive income is the total of net income and all other non-member changes in equity ("Comprehensive Income").

        In accordance with SFAS No. 115, as described above, the Company has recorded the changes in marketable securities value as Comprehensive Income in the accompanying consolidated financial statements. During 2000, all marketable securities were sold on a specific identification basis, which, at December 31, 1999 had a fair value of $2,239,000. The proceeds from the securities' sales totaled $1,176,000. The amount of unrealized gain reclassed out of Comprehensive Income was $1,123,000, which yielded a net realized gain of $60,000 over the purchase cost of $1,116,000.

    Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements

        In JuneAugust 2001, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards ("SFAS") No. 143, "Accounting for Asset Retirement Obligations." This statement addresses financial accounting and reporting for obligations associated with the retirement of tangible long-lived assets and the associated asset retirement costs. This statement applies to all entities and to all legal obligations associated with the retirement of long-lived assets that result from the acquisition, construction, development and the normal operation of a long-lived asset, except for certain obligations of lessees. This statement is effective for the Company's 2003 fiscal year and early adoption is permitted. The Company believes that the adoption of this statement will not have a material impact on its financial condition or results of operations.

71


        In August 2001, the FASB issued SFAS No. 144, "Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets." This statement requires one accounting model be used for long-lived assets to be disposed of by sale, whether previously held and used or newly acquired and broadens the presentation of discontinued operations to include additional disposal transactions. This statement is effective for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2001. The Company therefore adopted SFAS No. 144 in January 2002. The Company periodically evaluates its long-lived assets for impairment. Adoption of SFAS No. 144 did not have a material impact on the Company's financial condition or results of operations.

        In April 2002, the FASB issued SFAS No. 145, "Rescission of FASB Statements No. 4, 44, and 64, Amendment of FASB Statement No. 13, and Technical Corrections." SFAS No. 145 rescinds SFAS No. 4, "Reporting Gains and Losses from Extinguishment of Debt." Under SFAS No. 4, all gains and losses from extinguishment of debt were required to be aggregated, if material, and classified as an extraordinary item, net of related income tax effect, on the statement of income. SFAS No. 145 requires all gains and losses from extinguishment of debt to be classified as extraordinary only if they meet the criteria of Accounting Principles Board ("APB") Opinion 30. Any gain or loss on extinguishment of debt that was classified as an extraordinary item in prior periods presented that does not meet the criteria in APB Opinion 30 shallis required to be reclassified. This statement is effective for the Company's 2003 fiscal year and early adoption is permitted. In May 2002, the Company adopted this statement andstatement. Accordingly, the Company's gain (loss) on bond repurchases is classified its fiscal 2002 gain on repurchase of bonds, net of unamortized bond fees, of $50,500 as a component of interest expense. The Company also reclassified its fiscal 2001 extraordinary gain on repurchase of bonds, net of unamortized bond fees, of $343,000 as a component of interest expense.other income (expense) for all years presented.

        In June 2002, the FASB issued SFAS No. 146, "Accounting for Costs Associated with Exit or Disposal Activities." This statement addresses financial accounting and reporting for costs associated with exit or disposal activities and nullifies EITF No. 94-3, "Liability Recognition for Certain Employee Termination Benefits and Other Costs to Exit an Activity (including Certain Costs Incurred in a Restructuring)." This statement requires that a liability for a cost associated with an exit or disposal activity be recognized when the liability is incurred. A fundamental conclusion reached by the FASB in SFAS No. 146 is that an entity's commitment to a plan, by itself, does not create a present obligation to others that meets the definition of a liability. This statement also establishes that fair value is the objective for initial measurement of the liability. The provisions of this statement areCompany adopted SFAS No. 146 effective for exit or disposal activities that are initiated after December 31, 2002, with early application encouraged.January 1, 2003. The Company does not expect the adoption of this statement todid not have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.condition or results of operations.

72



        In November 2002, the FASB issued FASB Interpretation No. 45, "Guarantor's Accounting and Disclosure Requirements for Guarantees, including indirectIncluding Indirect Guarantees of Indebtedness of Others" ("FIN 45"). FIN 45 expands the information disclosures required by guarantors for obligations under certain types of guarantees. It also requires initial recognition at fair value of a liability for such guarantees. The initial recognition and initial measurement provisions of this Interpretation are applicable on a prospective basis to guarantees issued or modified after December 31, 2002, irrespective of the guarantor's fiscal year-end.2002. The disclosure requirements inof this Interpretation are effective for financial statements of interim or annual periods ending after December 15, 2002. The Company believes that the adoptionAdoption of this statement willFIN 45 did not have a material impact on its financial condition or results of operation.

        In January 2003, the FASB issued FASB Interpretation No. 46, "Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities" ("FIN 46"), which addresses consolidation by business enterprises where equity investors do not bear the residual economic risks and rewards. These entities have been commonly referred to as "special-purpose entities". Companies are required to apply the provisions of FIN 46 prospectively for all variable interest entities created after January 31, 2003. For public companies, all interests acquired

72



before February 1, 2003, must follow the new rules in account periods beginning after June 15, 2003. The Company has not yet evaluated the impact FIN 46 is expected to have on the Company's financial condition or results of operations.

        In April 2003, the FASB issued SFAS 149, "Amendments of Statement 133 on Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities." This statement amends SFAS 133, "Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities", and clarifies financial accounting and reporting for derivative instruments, including certain derivative instruments embedded in other contracts and hedging activities under SFAS 133. This statement is effective for contracts entered into or modified after June 30, 2003, except as stated below and for hedging relationships designated after June 30, 2003. The provisions of this statement that relate to Statement 133 Implementation Issues that have been effective for fiscal quarters that began prior to June 15, 2003, should continue to be applied in accordance with their respective effective dates. The adoption of this statement did not have a material impact on the Company's results of operations or financial position.

        In May 2003, the FASB issued SFAS 150, "Accounting for Certain Financial Instruments with Characteristics of both Liabilities and Equity." This statement establishes standards for how an issuer classifies and measures certain financial instruments with characteristics of both liabilities and equity. Financial instruments that are within the scope of the statement, which previously were often classified as equity, must now be classified as liabilities. This statement is effective for financial instruments entered into or modified after May 31, 2003, and otherwise is generally effective at the beginning of the first interim period beginning after June 15, 2003. The adoption of this statement did not have a material effect on the Company's results of operations or financial position.

    Reclassifications

        Certain reclassifications have been made to prior years' consolidated financial statements, which have no effect on net income, to conform to current year presentation.

2.     Certain Risks and Uncertainties

        A significant portion of the Company's revenues and operating income are generated from patrons who are residents of northern California. A change in general economic conditions or the extent and nature of casino gaming in California, Washington or Oregon could adversely affect the Company's operating results. On September 10, 1999, California lawmakers approved a constitutional amendment that would give IndianNative American tribes the right to offer slot machines and a range of house-banked card games. On March 7, 2000, California voters approved the constitutional amendment which legalized "Nevada-style" gaming on Native American reservations. While most existing Native American gaming facilities in northern California are modest compared to Eldorado, numerous Native American tribes have announced that they are in the process of expanding, developing, or are considering establishing large-scale hotel and gaming facilities in northern California. In particular, a significant new Native American casino located approximately 21 miles northeast of Sacramento opened in June 2003 and offers approximately 1,906 slot machines and 111 table games. Subsequent to its opening date in June through December 31, 2003, we experienced a decrease in our weekend casino volume resulting in a negative effect on our overall operating results. Based on its size and proximity, and potential expansion capabilities, we believe this new casino, along with the continued growth of other Native American gaming establishments, could continue to place additional competitive pressure

73



on our operating results. While we cannot predict the extent of any future impact, it could be significant.

3.     Operating Agreement of Resorts

        The rights and obligations of the equityholders of Resorts (the "Members") are governed by the Operating Agreement of Eldorado Resorts LLC dated as of June 28, 1996, as amended (the "Operating Agreement"), entered into in connection with the Reorganization. In accordance with the Reorganization, all assets and liabilities of the Predecessor Partnership became the assets and liabilities of Resorts. Each Members' interest in Resorts is equal to the percentage of capital contributed by that Member, in accordance with the ownership percentages previously held in the Predecessor Partnership. The Operating Agreement provides that no officer or member of the Board of Managers ("Board Member") of Resorts will be liable to Resorts, its Members or holders of its membership interests for acts or omissions of such officer or Board Member in connection with the business or affairs of Resorts, including for any breach of fiduciary duty or mistake of judgment, except for acts involving intentional misconduct, fraud or knowing violations of the law. Resorts will dissolve upon the earliest to occur of: (a) December 31, 2030, (b) the sale or disposition of all or substantially all of the assets in Resorts, (c) the written consent of Members holding more than a 75% voting interest in Resorts or (d) any event that, pursuant to the Operating Agreement, terminates a Member's interest, unless there are at least two remaining Members and at least a Majority Interest, as defined in the Operating Agreement, of the remaining Members agree to continue Resorts.

4.     Accounts Receivable

        Components of accounts receivable, net are as follows (in thousands):



 December 31,
 
 December 31,
 


 2002
 2001
 
 2003
 2002
 
Accounts receivableAccounts receivable $4,191 $4,531 Accounts receivable $4,270 $4,191 
Due from members and affiliates  92 
Allowance for doubtful accountsAllowance for doubtful accounts (1,043) (1,034)Allowance for doubtful accounts (1,256) (1,043)
 
 
   
 
 
Total $3,148 $3,589 Total $3,014 $3,148 
 
 
   
 
 

        The provision for bad debt expense is $624,000, $475,000 $437,000 and $1,710,000$437,000 for the years ended December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001, respectively. Writeoffs of accounts receivable in such periods were $416,000, $404,000 and 2000,$729,000, respectively.

73


5.     Property and Equipment

        Property and equipment consist of the following (in thousands):


 Estimated
Service
Life
(years)

 December 31,
  Estimated
Service
Life
(years)

 December 31,
 

 2002
 2001
  2003
 2002
 
Land and improvements  $16,786 $19,086   $16,786 $16,786 
Buildings and other leasehold improvements 10-33 165,787 163,159  10-33 165,795 165,787 
Furniture, fixtures and equipment 5-15 62,615 66,084  5-15 68,076 62,615 
Property held under capital lease (Note 12) 3-15 6,033 6,662  3-15 5,334 6,033 
Construction in progress   973 1,744    2,613 973 
   
 
    
 
 
   252,194 256,735    258,604 252,194 
Less—Accumulated depreciation   (121,840) (116,769)   (129,745) (121,840)
   
 
    
 
 
Property and equipment, net   $130,354 $139,966    $128,859 $130,354 
   
 
    
 
 

74


        At December 31, 2003 and 2002, accumulated depreciation includes $5.3 million and $5.4 million, respectively, related to assets acquired under capital leases.

        Substantially all property and equipment are pledged as collateral for long-term debt (see Note 9).

6.     Other Assets

        Other assets include the following amounts (in thousands):



 December 31,
 
 December 31,
 


 2002
 2001
 
 2003
 2002
 
Land held for developmentLand held for development $4,662 $4,662 Land held for development $3,104 $4,662 
Loan acquisition costs (New Credit Facility)Loan acquisition costs (New Credit Facility) 306 306 Loan acquisition costs (New Credit Facility) 306 306 
Bond offering costsBond offering costs 4,028 4,028 Bond offering costs 4,028 4,028 
OtherOther 934 809 Other 833 934 
 
 
   
 
 
 9,930 9,805   8,271 9,930 
Accumulated amortization loan costs (New Credit Facility)Accumulated amortization loan costs (New Credit Facility) (92) (26)Accumulated amortization loan costs (New Credit Facility) (158) (92)
Accumulated amortization bond costsAccumulated amortization bond costs (2,771) (2,276)Accumulated amortization bond costs (3,328) (2,771)
 
 
   
 
 
Total $7,067 $7,503 Total $4,785 $7,067 
 
 
   
 
 

        Amortization of bond and loan costs are computed using the straight-line method, which approximates the effective interest method, over the term of the bonds or loans, respectively.

        Included in other assets at December 31, 20022003 and 20012002 are net bond offering and loan acquisition costs of $1.5$0.8 million and $2.0$1.5 million, respectively, which are being amortized over the life of the applicable agreements.

7.     Investment in Joint Ventures

        Effective March 1, 1994, ELLC and Galleon, Inc. (a Nevada corporation owned and controlled by Mandalay Resort Group) entered into a joint venture (the "Silver Legacy Joint Venture") pursuant to a joint venture agreement (the "Original Joint Venture Agreement") to develop the Silver Legacy Resort Casino (the "Silver Legacy"). The Silver Legacy consists of a casino and hotel located in Reno, Nevada, which began operations on July 28, 1995. During 1994, ELLC contributed land to the Silver Legacy Joint Venture with a fair value of $25,000,000 (a book value of $17,215,000) and cash of

74



$23,000,000. $23,000,000. Additional cash contributions of $3,900,000 were made in 1995, for a total equity investment of $51,900,000. Galleon, Inc. contributed cash of $51,900,000 to the Silver Legacy Joint Venture. Each partner owns a 50% interest in the Silver Legacy Joint Venture.

        On March 5, 2002, the Partners executed a new amendment and restatement of the Original Joint Venture Agreement (as further amended in April 2002, the "New Joint Venture Agreement") and the Silver Legacy Joint Venture and its wholly-owned finance subsidiary, Silver Legacy Capital Corp., issued $160 million principal amount of 101/8% mortgage notes due 2012 (the "Silver Legacy Notes"). Concurrently with the issuance of the Silver Legacy Notes, the Silver Legacy Joint Venture (i) repaid the entire outstanding balance of the Original Silver Legacy Credit Agreement, (ii) entered into a new senior secured credit facility comprised of a $20.0 million term loan facility that will amortize over a period of five years and a $20.0 million revolving facility with a five year maturity (the "New Silver Legacy Credit Agreement"), and (iii) made distributions of $10.0 million to ELLC and $20.0 million to Mandalay Sub, utilizing the balance of the net proceeds of the Silver Legacy Notes and $26.0 million of borrowings under the New Silver Legacy Credit Agreement. The New Silver Legacy Credit Agreement is secured by a first priority security interest in substantially all of the existing and future assets (other than certain licenses which may not be pledged under applicable law) of the Silver Legacy Joint Venture and a first priority pledge of and security interest in all of the Partnership interests in the Silver Legacy Joint Venture. The Silver Legacy Notes are secured by a security interest in the same assets and pledges of and security interest in the same Partnership interests which are junior to the security interests and pledges securing the New Silver Legacy Credit Agreement.

75


        Concurrently with the closing of the issuance of the Silver Legacy Notes, the Original Joint Venture Agreement was amended and restated in its entirety and was further amended in April 2002. The April 2002 amendments were principally (i) to provide equal voting rights for ELLC and Mandalay Sub (and procedures for resolving deadlocks) with respect to approval of the Silver Legacy Joint Venture's annual business plan and the appointment and compensation of the general manager, and (ii) to give each partner the right to terminate the general manager.

        Subject to any contractual restrictions to which the Silver Legacy Joint Venture is subject, including the indenture relating to the Silver Legacy Notes, and prior to the occurrence of a "Liquidating Event," the Silver Legacy Joint Venture will be required by the New Joint Venture Agreement to make distributions to its Partners as follows:

    (a)
    TaxAn amount equal to tax distributions equal to the estimated taxable income of the Silver Legacy Joint Venture allocable to each Partner multiplied by the greater of the maximum marginal federal income tax rate applicable to individuals for such period (as of the date hereof, 38.6%) or the maximum marginal federal income tax rate applicable to corporations for such period (as of the date hereof both rates are 35%); provided, however, that if the State of Nevada enacts an income tax (including any franchise tax based on income), the applicable tax rate for any tax distributions subsequent to the effective date of such income tax shall be increased by the higher of the maximum marginal individual tax rate or corporate income tax rate imposed by such tax (after reduction for the federal tax benefit for the deduction of state taxes, using the maximum marginal federal, individual or corporate rate, respectively).

    (b)
    Annual distributions of remaining "Net Cash From Operations" in proportion to the Percentage Interests of the Partners.

    (c)
    Distributions of "Net Cash From Operations" in amounts or at times that differ from those described in (a) and (b) above, provided in each case that both Partners agree in writing to the distribution in advance thereof.

        As defined in the New Joint Venture Agreement, the term "Net Cash From Operations" means the gross cash proceeds received by the Silver Legacy Joint Venture, less the following amounts:

75



(i) cash operating expenses and payments of other expenses and obligations of the Silver Legacy Joint Venture, including interest and scheduled principal payments on Silver Legacy Joint Venture indebtedness, including indebtedness owed to the Partners, if any, (ii) all capital expenditures made by the Silver Legacy Joint Venture, and (iii) such reasonable reserves as the Partners deem necessary in good faith and in the best interests of the Silver Legacy Joint Venture to meet anticipated future obligations and liabilities of the Silver Legacy Joint Venture (less any release of reserves previously established, as similarly determined). Any withdrawal from the Silver Legacy Joint Venture by either Partner results in a reduction of distributions to such withdrawing Partner to 75% of amounts otherwise payable to such Partner.

Summarized information for the Company's equity in the Silver Legacy Joint Venture is as follows (in thousands):


 December 31,
2002

 December 31,
2001

  December 31,
2003

 December 31,
2002

 
Beginning balance $67,603 $61,608  $59,484 $67,603 
Partners' Distribution (16,502) (4,565) (2,025) (16,502)
Equity in net income of unconsolidated affiliate 8,383 10,560  4,748 8,383 
 
 
  
 
 
Ending balance $59,484 $67,603  $62,207 $59,484 
 
 
  
 
 

76


        Summarized balance sheet information for the Silver Legacy Joint Venture is as follows (in thousands):



 December 31,

 December 31,


 2002
 2001

 2003
 2002
Current assetsCurrent assets $23,627 $21,619Current assets $28,358 $23,627
Property and equipment, netProperty and equipment, net 272,940 280,975Property and equipment, net 265,852 272,940
Other assets, netOther assets, net 7,969 575Other assets, net 8,176 7,969
 
 
 
 
Total assets $304,536 $303,169Total assets $302,386 $304,536
 
 
 
 
Current liabilitiesCurrent liabilities $17,185 $22,762Current liabilities $17,828 $17,185
Long-term liabilitiesLong-term liabilities 170,285 135,000Long-term liabilities 162,046 170,285
Partners' equityPartners' equity 117,066 145,407Partners' equity 122,512 117,066
 
 
 
 
Total liabilities and partners' equity $304,536 $303,169Total liabilities and partners' equity $302,386 $304,536
 
 
 
 

        Summarized results of operations for the Silver Legacy Joint Venture are as follows (in thousands):


 Year Ended December 31,
  Year Ended December 31,
 

 2002
 2001
 2000
  2003
 2002
 2001
 
Net Revenues $159,432 $164,677 $177,489  $151,955 $159,432 $164,677 
Operating Expenses (129,124) (130,595) (140,246) (126,451) (129,124) (130,595)
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
Operating Income 30,308 34,082 37,243  25,504 30,308 34,082 
 
 
 
 
Other Expense (13,542) (12,962) (15,473) (16,008) (13,542) (12,962)
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
Net Income $16,766 $21,120 $21,770  $9,496 $16,766 $21,120 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 

        Effective December 13, 2000, Resorts entered into an agreement to form Tamarack Crossings, LLC and Tamarack Partners, LLC, each a Nevada limited liability company (collectively the "Tamarack Entities"), to develop, own and operate Tamarack Junction ("Tamarack"), a small casino then being

76



constructed in south Reno, Nevada. In May 2001, the Tamarack Entities consummated a plan of merger with Tamarack Crossings, LLC being the surviving entity. In June 2001,entity, in which Resorts entered into an agreement with the Robert and Nana Sullivan Family Trust (the "Trust"), an unaffiliated entity, to reduce Resorts' percentage interest in Tamarack Crossings, LLC toowns a 21.25% from 42.5%. Donald Carano exercised an option effective February 19, 2002 to purchase from the Trust an additional 21.25%, thus increasing his total interest to 26.25%.interest. Resorts has a nontransferable option to purchase from Donald Carano, at a purchase price equal to his cost plus any undistributed income attributable thereto, an additional 10%21.25% interest in Tamarack Crossings, LLC which is exercisable until June 30, 2010. The business and affairs of the Tamarack are managed by fourFour members of Tamarack Crossings, LLC, including Resorts which has been designated "Chief Executive Manager" and is responsible for overseeingthree unaffiliated third parties, manage the day-to-day operationsbusiness and affairs of the Tamarack. Resorts has designated Gene Carano as its representative. At December 31, 20022003 and 2001,2002, Resorts' financial investment in Tamarack Crossings, LLC was $3.4 million.$4.0 million and $3.6 million, respectively. Resorts' capital contribution to Tamarack Crossings, LLC represents its proportionate share of the total capital contributions of the members. Additional capital contributions of the members, including Resorts, may be required for certain purposes, including the payment of operating costs and capital expenditures or the repayment of loans, to the extent such costs are not funded by prior capital contributions and earnings. The Company's investment in Tamarack is accounted for using the equity method of accounting. Equity in income (loss) related to Tamarack for the years ended December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001 of $866,000, $585,000 and ($148,000), respectively, is included as a component of operating income. The Tamarack purchased products prior to its opening and has continued purchasing various products, such as meat and bakery items, from or through the Eldorado which totaled $98,000, $461,000 and $331,000 in 2003, 2002 and 2001, respectively. The Tamarack purchased these products at the Company's cost.

        Effective July 1, 2000, Resorts and Avereon Research LTD. ("ARL") entered into an agreement to form MindPlay, LLC (the "MindPlay Entity"), for the purpose of developing, owning and marketing a sophisticated system which if successfully completed, will permit the tracking and surveillance of pit gaming operations

77



("MindPlay"). MindPlay is in the developmental stage and there is no assurance that the system will ever be successfully developed and marketed. In April 2002, Resorts purchasedowns an additional 1%18% interest in the MindPlay Entity, which increased Resorts percentage ownership to 19% after taking into account additional shares issued in 2002. Resorts also has an option to acquire an additional 2.3% interest in the MindPlay Entity. The purchase price is equal to $211,000 per 1% and is exercisable until June 30, 2004. The MindPlay Entity is managed by a Board of Managers, which consists of three Managers designated by ARL and two Managers designated by Resorts. Other investors in the MindPlay Entity include Robert Jones, Don Carano, Gene Carano, Gary Carano, Glenn Carano, Gregg Carano, Rhonda Carano, Rob Mouchou, Rick Murdock and Robert B. MacKay, each an affiliate or executive of Resorts, each of whom owns an individual interest in MindPlay, which in the aggregate is 13.6%.who own collectively a 14.1% interest. These individuals acquired their interests in the MindPlay Entity under the same terms and conditions as those of Resorts. At December 31, 20022003 and 2001,2002, Resorts' financial investment in the MindPlay Entity was $1.6$0.6 million and $1.4$1.1 million, respectively. The Company's investment in the MindPlay Entity is accounted for using the equity method of accounting. Equity in net loss related to the MindPlay Entity for the yearyears ended December 31, 2003 and 2002 of $511,000 and $355,000, respectively, is included as a component of non-operating income. See Note 15.

77



8.     Accrued and Other Liabilities

        Accrued and other liabilities consist of the following (in thousands):


 December 31,
 December 31,

 2002
 2001
 2003
 2002
Accrued payroll and benefits $1,558 $1,155 $638 $1,558
Accrued vacation 1,074 993 998 1,074
Accrued medical claims 741 608 750 741
Accrued bonuses  10
Accrued taxes 746 732 961 746
Unclaimed chips and tokens 706 1,053 474 706
Progressive slot liability 1,454 1,520 1,403 1,454
Other 988 568 1,264 988
 
 
 
 
 $7,267 $6,639 $6,488 $7,267
 
 
 
 

9.     Long-Term Debt

        Long-term debt consists of the following (in thousands):


 December 31,
  December 31,
 

 2002
 2001
  2003
 2002
 
101/2% Senior Subordinated Notes $82,695 $89,850  $64,249 $82,695 

Outstanding portion of reducing revolver and the revolving credit line

 

1,000

 

21,750

 

Outstanding portion of reducing revolver credit facility

 

13,000

 

1,000

 

Notes payable to individuals

 

1,340

 

1,656

 

 

996

 

1,340

 
 
 
  
 
 
 85,035 113,256 
 

78,245

 

85,035

 

Less—Current portion

 

(344

)

 

(315

)

 

(355

)

 

(344

)
 
 
  
 
 
 $84,691 $112,941 
 

$

77,890

 

$

84,691

 
 
 
  
 
 

78


        Scheduled maturities of long-term debt are as follows for the years ended December 31, (in thousands):

2003 $344
2004 355 $355
2005 373 373
2006 83,963 77,517
Thereafter  
 
 
 $85,035 $78,245
 
 

        On July 31, 1996, Resorts and Capital (the "Issuers"), sold $100,000,000 in aggregate principal amount of 101/2% Senior Subordinated Notes due 2006, (the "Notes"). The Notes are joint and several obligations of the Issuers. The Notes mature on August 15, 2006 and bear interest at the rate of 101/2% per annum, payable semi-annually in arrears on February 15 and August 15 of each year, commencing on February 15, 1997. Pursuant to a Registration Rights Agreement dated as of July 31, 1996, among the Issuers and the Initial Purchasers party thereto, the Issuers filed a registration statement under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the "1933 Act") with respect to an offer to exchange the Notes,

78



which were issued in reliance on an exemption from registration under the 1933 Act, for registered debt securities of the Issuers ("Registered Notes") with terms identical to the Notes. The exchange of the Notes for the Registered Notes was completed on February 26, 1997.

        The Indenture relating to the Notes contains certain covenants which, among other things, limit the ability of the Issuers and any Restricted Subsidiaries (as defined in the Indenture) to incur additional indebtedness, pay dividends or make other distributions, create certain liens, enter into certain transactions with affiliates, utilize proceeds from asset sales, issue or sell equity interests of subsidiaries and enter into certain mergers and consolidations and requires the Company to maintain certain financial requirements. The Company was in compliance with these covenants at December 31, 20022003 and 2001.

        In October 2001, the Company purchased $10.2 million principal amount of its 101/2% Notes on the open market. The Company borrowed $9.7 million under its New Credit Facility to facilitate the purchase. The Notes were purchased at a discount resulting in a gain of $343,000 after writing off unamortized fees relating to the bond offering.

        In June 2002, the Company purchased $2.0 million principal amount of its 101/2% Notes on the open market. The Company borrowed $1.5 million under its New Credit Facility to facilitate the purchase. The Notes were purchased at a discount resulting in a gain of $35,000 after writing off unamortized fees relating to the bond offering.

        In August 2002, the Company purchased $5.2 million principal amount of its 101/2% Notes on the open market. The Company borrowed $3.0 million under its New Credit Facility to facilitate the purchase. The Notes were purchased at a discount resulting in a gain of $15,500 after writing off unamortized fees relating to the bond offering.2002.

        The New Credit Facility provides for a senior secured revolving credit facility of $40$30 million. The amount of credit available pursuant to the New Credit Facility reduces by $1.6$1.0 million on MarchDecember 31, 20032004 and at the end of each subsequent quarter until March 31, 2006, when the facility terminates and any balance then outstanding becomes due and payable. Borrowings under the New Credit Facility bear interest, at the Company's option, at either (i) the greater of (a) the rate publicly announced from time to time by Bank of America as its "Prime Rate" or (b) the Federal Funds Rate plus .50% ("Base Rate") or (ii) a Eurodollar rate determined in accordance with the New Credit Facility. The Eurodollar rate was 1.37%1.11% and the Base rateRate was 4.25%4.00% as of December 31, 2002.2003. The effective rate of interest on borrowings under the New Credit Facility was 5.5%3.54% per annum as of December 31, 2002.2003. As of December 31, 2002, $1.02003, $13.0 million of borrowings were outstanding under the New Credit Facility and an additional $38.3$17.0 million of borrowing capacity was available thereunder.

        The New Credit Facility is secured by substantially all of the Company's real property. The New Credit Facility includes various restrictions and other covenants including: (i) restrictions on the disposition of property, (ii) restrictions on investments and acquisitions, (iii) restrictions on distributions to members of Resorts, (iv) restrictions on the incurrence of liens and negative pledges, (v) restrictions on the incurrence of indebtedness and the issuance of guarantees, (vi) restrictions on transactions with affiliates and, (vii) restrictions on annual capital expenditures including capital leases. The New Credit Facility also contains financial covenants including a maximum total debt to EBITDA ratio, a maximum senior debt to EBITDA ratio, a minimum fixed charge coverage ratio and a minimum equity requirement. The Company entered into an agreement to amend the New Credit Facility effective December 31, 2001 which increased the maximum total debt to EBITDA ratio. As of December 31, 2002,2003, the Company was in compliance with all provisions of the New Credit Facility.

79



        The notes payable to individuals are due in monthly installments of $34,614 and $3,000, including monthly interest at 9% and prime plus 2% (6.25%(6.0% at December 31, 2002)2003), to August 14, 2006 and May 16, 2004, respectively, when the principal balance is due. The notes are secured by real property.

79



10.   Employee Benefit Plans

        On May 1, 1990, the Company established a voluntary, qualified, defined contribution plan covering all full-time employees of the Company who have completed six months and 1,000 hours of service and are age twenty-one or older. The plan allows for an employer contribution up to 25 percent of the first 3 percent of each participating employee's contribution. Prior to 2002, employer contribution was 25 percent of the first 6 percent of each participating employee's contribution. Plan participants can elect to defer pre-tax compensation through payroll deductions. These deferrals are regulated under Section 401(k) of the Internal Revenue Code. The Company's matching contributions were $159,000, $212,000 $358,000 and $387,000$358,000 for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2003, 2002 2001 and 2000,2001, respectively.

11.   Executive Deferred Compensation Plans

        Effective January 1, 1990, the Company established a Deferred Compensation Plan for the benefit of a select group of management or highly compensated employees. As of December 31, 2002,2003, three employees and one former employee of the Company were eligible to participate. Under the Deferred Compensation Plan as presently administered, eligible employees may elect each year to defer the receipt of a portion of their compensation from the Company. A participating employee is 100% vested with respect to any amount deferred pursuant to his or her deferral election. Amounts deferred in years prior to 1991, which were determined in the sole discretion of Resorts' Chief Executive Officer, Donald Carano, vest 20% per year so that they become vested over a five-year period. A participating employee becomes 100% vested in all amounts credited to such employee's account upon retirement, death, permanent disability or termination of employment with the Company for any reason other than fraud, or upon a sale of substantially all of the Company's assets or if the Carano family ceases to have majority ownership or control of the Company. Participating employees are entitled to receive annual distributions commencing upon the earliest of the second month after death, permanent disability, retirement or, if employment is terminated for reasons other than death or disability prior to attainment of age 60, attainment of age 60. However, Resorts' Chief Executive Officer may in his sole discretion elect to make a distribution to a terminated employee prior to such terminated employee attaining age 60. In addition, such Chief Executive Officer may in his sole discretion elect to distribute an employee's benefits in the form of a lump sum distribution and may elect to distribute benefits to an employee over a shorter period of time than that provided for in the Deferred Compensation Plan. In 2002, the Chief Executive Officer elected to distribute lump sum distributions in the aggregate amount of $396,000 to two participating employees thus eliminating their participation. The Chief Executive Officer elected to distribute lump sum distributions totaling an additional $469,000 to three participating employees representing 50% of their available balance as of December 31, 2002. One participating employee is receiving distributions over a period of time. As of December 31, 20022003 and 2001,2002, the Company had accrued obligations of $634,000$638,000 and $1,417,000,$634,000, respectively, related to this deferred compensation agreement, which represents an unfunded obligation of the Company.

        The Company instituted the Eldorado Performance and Appreciation Rights Plan (the "Plan") for the benefit of certain of its key executives and other key employees of the Company and its general partners, effective for the fiscal year commencing January 1, 1995. To be eligible to be granted performance and/or appreciation rights, which could only be granted until June 1, 2000, a person was required to be an executive or other key employee of the Company or an affiliate of the Company on the proposed grant date. No performance rights were ever granted under the Plan. An appreciation right allows the recipient to receive compensation based upon the difference between the value of the

80



Company, as defined, as of January 1, 1995 (the "Base Rate") and the future value of the Company. One Company Unit (1% of the Company) is equivalent to the combination of 100,000 performance rights and 100,000 appreciation rights. The Base Rate for each appreciation right is $26.66 as of January 1, 1995. The Company value is calculated as a factor of eight (8) times trailing twelve months

80



operating income (adjusted for certain items to approximate EBITDA) less funded indebtedness and adjusted for certain additional items, as defined. The rights are not ownership interests in the Company. As of December 31, 1996, 860,000 appreciation rights were granted. No additional rights were granted after 1996.

        The Plan's committee shall determine the date on which each appreciation right shall vest and become exercisable; as of December 31, 2002,2003, no vesting period had been established. The Company value as of December 31, 20022003 and 2001,2002, as calculated, is below the $26.66 Base Rate, and therefore no accrual is required as of December 31, 20022003 and 2001.2002. Except as defined in the Plan agreement, the Company has no duty or obligation to fund or secure the benefits payable to key executives.

12.   Commitments and Contingencies

    Letters of Credit

        The New Credit Facility (see Note 9) allows for the issuance of letters of credit which reduces the available line by the amount pledged. At December 31, 2002 the amount pledged to Washoe County for the Verdi property development was $685,000.

    Capital Leases

        The Company leases certain equipment under agreements classified as capital leases. The future minimum lease payments by year under these leases, together with the present value of the minimum lease payments consisted of the following at December 31, 20022003 (in thousands):

2003 $124 
2004 65  $90 
2005 17 
Thereafter    
 
  
 
Minimum lease payments 189  107 
Less—Amounts representing interest (14) (6)
 
  
 
 $175  $101 
 
  
 

    Operating Leases

        The Company leases equipment under operating leases. Future minimum payments (expiring from 2003 and thereafter) under noncancellable operating leases with initial terms of one year or more consisted of the following at December 31, 20022003 (in thousands):


 Future Minimum
Lease Payments

 Future Minimum
Lease Payments

2003 $635
2004 426 $629
2005 150 157
2006 77
Thereafter 77 
 
 
 $1,288 $863
 
 

        Total rental expense under operating leases was $897,000 for the year ended December 31, 2003, $905,000 for the year ended December 31, 2002 and $593,000 for the year ended December 31, 2001 and $733,000 for the year ended December 31, 2000.2001. Additional rent for land upon which the Eldorado Hotel Casino resides of $638,000$629,000 in 20022003 ($659,000638,000 in 20002002 and $642,000 in 2001) was paid to C, S and Y Associates, a general partnership of which Donald Carano is a general partner, based on gross gaming receipts. This rental agreement expires June 30, 2027.

81



    Legal Matters

        The Company is a litigant in legal matters arising in the normal course of business. In the opinion of management, all pending legal matters are either adequately covered by insurance or, if not insured, will not have a material adverse effect on the financial position or results of operations of the Company.

13.   Management Fees

        Resorts pays management fees to Recreational Enterprises, Inc. and Hotel Casino Management, Inc., the owners of 55% and 29% of Resorts' equity interests, respectively. Historically, the salaries of senior executive officers and certain other key employees of the Predecessor Partnership were not directly incurred by the Predecessor Partnership, but were paid from a portion of the management fees paid to Recreational Enterprises, Inc. As of July 1, 1996, the aggregate annual salaries of such senior executive officers and other key employees became payroll obligations of Resorts. In connection with the consummation of the offering of the Notes, Resorts entered into a Management Agreement with Recreational Enterprises, Inc. and Hotel Casino Management, Inc. providing that future management fees paid to Recreational Enterprises, Inc. and Hotel Casino Management, Inc. will not exceed 1.5% of Resorts' annual net revenues in effect until July 1, 2005 and will automatically renew for additional three-year terms until terminated by one of the Parties.

        Management fees paid were $295,000 for 2003, $48,000 for 2002 and $1,201,000 for 2001 and $1,790,000 for 2000.2001.

14.   Related Parties

        The Company owns the entire parcel on which the Eldorado is located, except for approximately 30,000 square feet which is leased by the Company from C, S and Y Associates, a general partnership of which Donald Carano is a general partner (the "C, S and Y Lease"). The C, S and Y Lease expires on June 30, 2027. Annual rent is equal to the greater of (i) $400,000 or (ii) an amount based on a decreasing percentage of the Eldorado's gross gaming revenues ranging from 3% of the first $6.5 million of gross gaming revenues to 0.1% of gross gaming revenues in excess of $75 million. Rent paid pursuant to the C, S and Y Lease totaled approximately $629,000, $638,000 and $642,000 in 2003, 2002 and $659,000 in 2002, 2001, and 2000, respectively.

        The Company from time to time leases an aircraftaircrafts owned by Recreational Enterprises, Inc., which owns 55% of Resorts, for use in operating the Company's business. In 2003, 2002 2001 and 2000,2001, lease payments for the aircraft totaled $695,000, $361,000 $313,000 and $350,000,$313,000, respectively.

        Resorts owns a 21.25% interest in Tamarack Junction, a small casino located in south Reno, Nevada, in which Donald Carano owned a 26.25% interest at December 31, 2002.2003. The Tamarack purchased products prior to its opening and has continued purchasing various products, such as meat and bakery items, from or through the Eldorado which totaled $98,000, $461,000 and $331,000 in 2003, 2002 and 2001, respectively. The Tamarack purchased these products at the Company's cost.

        In 1998, the Eldorado began purchasing advertising posters, banners and other material from Lexicon Design, Inc., a corporation which is wholly-owned by the wife of Glenn Carano, son of Donald Carano. For such purchases, the Eldorado paid Lexicon Design, Inc. $207,000 and $129,000 in 2001 and 2000, respectively.2001. The Company did not use Lexicon Design, Inc. in 2003 and 2002.

        In 2002, the Company purchased from MindPlay nine computerized gaming tables for $210,000 which are being used on the casino floor and are enhancing player tracking and casino surveillance. At this time there is no other device onIn 2003, the market withCompany paid MindPlay approximately $4,800 for services relating to the sophisticated player tracking and surveillance capabilities that MindPlay is offering.tables purchased in 2002.

82



        The Company occasionally purchases wine and firewood directly from the Ferrari Carano Winery, which is owned by Recreational Enterprises, Inc. and Donald Carano. The firewood is used in the Eldorado in its various wood burning ovens while wine purchases are sent directly to customers in appreciation of their patronage. In 2003, 2002 and 2001, the Company spent approximately $68,000, $61,000 and $60,000 respectively, for these products.

        In 2003, the Silver Legacy made payments pursuant to the New Joint Venture Agreement, representing tax distributions, to the Company in the amount of $2,025,000. For the year ended December 31, 2003, Resorts made distributions of $2.5 million, utilizing all of the $2,025,000 from the Silver Legacy, to it members for income taxes. Total distributions received from the Silver Legacy for the years ended December 31, 2002 and 2001 were $16,502,000 and $4,565,000, respectively.

15.   Subsequent Events

    Bond RepurchaseMindPlay Asset Sale

        In January 2003,        On February 19, 2004, Alliance Gaming Corp., a New York Stock Exchange listed company ("Alliance"), purchased all of the Company purchased $7.9 millionassets of the MindPlay Entity, consisting primarily of intellectual property, and assumed certain liabilities in the aggregate amount of $2,000,000. The principal amount of its 101/2% Notesliabilities assumed included a $1,250,000 working capital line, 54.28% of which had been guaranteed by Resorts. The consideration received by the MindPlay Entity included $9.0 million in cash, the assumpiton of $2.0 million of liabilities and promissory notes issued by Alliance in the aggregate principal amount of $4,000,000 which are payable in equal installments after two and four years, respectively, with interest at the rate of 6% per annum. In addition, the MindPlay Entity received options to purchase 100,000 shares of Alliance, common stock, which are exercisable at an exercise price of $24.69 per share. The options, which expire on February 19, 2011, become exercisable as to 50,000 of the open market. The Company borrowed $8.0 million under its New Credit Facility to facilitate the purchase. The Notes were purchased at a premium resulting in a loss of $266,000 after writing off unamortized fees relatingshares on February 19, 2006 and as to the bond offering.balance on February 19, 2008. For a thirteen year period subsequent to the closing date, Alliance will pay the MindPlay Entity royalties, which will be based upon a percentage of gross profit for the first seven years and a percentage of revenue for the remaining six years, from the sale of MindPlay products. Royalty payments totalling at least $1,000,000 over the first two years are guaranteed. The MindPlay Entity has given certain indemnifications to Alliance related to the intellectual property which could ultimately affect the amount of notes collected due to certain offsets and impact the amount of royalties collected. The amount of royalties to be received is subject to a number of future events, the impact of which cannot be determined at this time, including development of manufacturing, sales and marketing programs by Alliance and the level of acceptance of the relatively new MindPlay product by the gaming industry. On March 8, 2004, the Company received a cash distribution of $1,191,150 from the MindPlay Entity. It is anticipated that the Company will receive an additional cash distribution of approximately $105,000 by the end of March 2004. Resorts is entitled to receive $600,000 in 2006 from the note and royalty proceeds as consideration for termination of a services agreement between Resorts and the MindPlay Entity.

83



CIRCUS AND ELDORADO JOINT VENTURE
(doing business as Silver Legacy Resort Casino)

INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 
 Page
Independent Auditors' Report, Deloitte & Touche LLP 85

Report of Independent Public Accountants, Arthur Andersen LLP

 

86

Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2002 and 2001

 

87

Consolidated Statements of Income for the years ended
December 31, 2002, 2001 and 2000

 

88

Consolidated Statements of Partners' Equity for the years ended
December 31, 2002, 2001 and 2000

 

89

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended
December 31, 2002, 2001 and 2000

 

90

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

 

91

84



INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT

To the Partners of
Circus and Eldorado Joint Venture
    (doing(doing business as Silver Legacy Resort Casino):

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheetsheets of Circus and Eldorado Joint Venture (doing business as SILVER LEGACY RESORT CASINO)Silver Legacy Resort Casino) and subsidiary (the "Joint(the"Joint Venture") as of December 31, 2003 and 2002, and the related consolidated statements of income, partners' equity and cash flows for the yearyears then ended. Our auditaudits also included the consolidated financial statement schedule for the yearyears ended December 31, 2003 and 2002 included in Item 15(a)(2). These financial statements and financial statement schedule are the responsiblityresponsibility of the Joint Venture's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and financial statement schedule based on our audit.audits. The consolidated financial statements of the Joint Venture as of December 31, 2001 and for the yearsyear ended December 31, 2001 and 2000 were audited by other auditors who have ceased operations. Those auditors expressed an unqualified opinion on those financial statements in their report dated February 8, 2002.

We conducted our auditaudits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit providesaudits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, such consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Circus and Eldorado Joint Venture (doing business as SILVER LEGACY RESORT CASINO)Silver Legacy Resort Casino) and subsidiary as of December 31, 2003 and 2002, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for the yearyears then ended, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Also, in our opinion, such consolidated financial statement schedule, when considered in relation to the basic consolidated financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly in all material respects the information set forth therein.

DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

Reno, Nevada
Feburary 25, 2003March 22, 2004

85


This is a copy of the report previously issued by Arthur Andersen LLP. The report has not been reissued by Arthur Andersen LLP nor has Arthur Andersen LLP provided a consent to the inclusion of its report in this annual report on Form 10-K.


REPORT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

To the Partners of
Circus and Eldorado Joint Venture
    (doing(doing business as Silver Legacy Resort Casino):

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Circus and Eldorado Joint Venture (doing business as SILVER LEGACY RESORT CASINO)Silver Legacy Resort Casino) and subsidiary (the "Joint(the"Joint Venture") as of December 31, 2001 and 2000, and the related consolidated statements of income, partners' equity and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2001. These financial statements are the responsiblityresponsibility of the Joint Venture's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Circus and Eldorado Joint Venture (doing business as SILVER LEGACY RESORT CASINO)Silver Legacy Resort Casino) and subsidiary as of December 31, 2001 and 2000, and the results of operations and their cash flows for the each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2001, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States.

As explained in Note 1 to the financial statements, effective January 1, 2001, the Joint Venture changed its method of accounting for interest rate swaps to compycomply with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 133.

ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP

Las Vegas, NV
FeburaryFebruary 8, 2002

86



CIRCUS AND ELDORADO JOINT VENTURE
(doing business as Silver Legacy Resort Casino)


CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

As of December 31, 20022003 and 20012002

(In thousands)



 2002
 2001

 2003
 2002
ASSETSASSETSASSETS

CURRENT ASSETS:

CURRENT ASSETS:

 

 

 

 

CURRENT ASSETS:

 

 

 

 
Cash and cash equivalents $14,913 $12,256Cash and cash equivalents $19,405 $14,913
Accounts receivable, net 3,573 4,300Accounts receivable, net 3,476 3,573
Inventories 1,823 1,877Inventories 1,757 1,823
Prepaid expenses and other 3,318 3,186Prepaid expenses and other 3,720 3,318
 
 
 
 
 Total current assets 23,627 21,619 Total current assets 28,358 23,627

PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT, NET

PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT, NET

 

272,940

 

280,975
PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT, NET 265,852 272,940

OTHER ASSETS, NET

OTHER ASSETS, NET

 

7,969

 

575
OTHER ASSETS, NET 8,176 7,969
 
 
 
 
 Total Assets $304,536 $303,169 Total Assets $302,386 $304,536
 
 
 
 
LIABILITIES AND PARTNERS' EQUITYLIABILITIES AND PARTNERS' EQUITY
LIABILITIES AND PARTNERS' EQUITY

CURRENT LIABILITIES:

CURRENT LIABILITIES:

 

 

 

 

CURRENT LIABILITIES:

 

 

 

 
Current portion of long-term debt $ $10,000Accounts payable $4,260 $3,412
Accounts payable 3,412 3,797Accrued interest 5,400 5,422
Accrued interest 5,422 130Accrued and other liabilities 8,168 8,351
Accrued and other liabilities 8,351 8,650  
 
Accrued guarantee fees to related party  185 Total current liabilities 17,828 17,185
 
 
Total current liabilities 17,185 22,762

LONG-TERM DEBT, LESS CURRENT PORTION

 

168,430

 

135,000
LONG-TERM DEBTLONG-TERM DEBT 159,492 168,430

OTHER LONG-TERM LIABILITIES

OTHER LONG-TERM LIABILITIES

 

1,855

 

OTHER LONG-TERM LIABILITIES 2,554 1,855
 
 
 
 
Total liabilities 187,470 157,762 Total liabilities 179,874 187,470
 
 
 
 
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES (Note 10)COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES (Note 10)    COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES (Note 10)    

PARTNERS' EQUITY

PARTNERS' EQUITY

 

117,066

 

145,407
PARTNERS' EQUITY 122,512 117,066
 
 
 
 
Total Liabilities and Partners' Equity $304,536 $303,169 Total Liabilities and Partners' Equity $302,386 $304,536
 
 
 
 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

87



CIRCUS AND ELDORADO JOINT VENTURE
(doing business as Silver Legacy Resort Casino)


CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME

For the Years Ended December 31, 2003, 2002 2001 and 20002001

(In thousands)



 2002
 2001
 2000
 
 2003
 2002
 2001
 
OPERATING REVENUES:OPERATING REVENUES:       OPERATING REVENUES:       
Casino $93,981 $98,374 $109,641 Casino $88,649 $93,981 $98,374 
Rooms 35,747 37,835 37,936 Rooms 35,722 35,747 37,835 
Food and beverage 35,780 35,558 36,832 Food and beverage 34,490 35,780 35,558 
Other 8,816 7,508 8,786 Other 8,005 8,816 7,508 
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
  174,324 179,275 193,195   166,866 174,324 179,275 
Less: promotional allowances (14,892) (14,598) (15,706)
Less: promotional allowancesLess: promotional allowances (14,911) (14,892) (14,598)
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
 Net operating revenues 159,432 164,677 177,489  Net operating revenues 151,955 159,432 164,677 
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
OPERATING EXPENSES:OPERATING EXPENSES:       OPERATING EXPENSES:       
Casino 44,685 45,820 48,723 Casino 44,531 44,685 45,820 
Rooms 11,487 12,166 12,867 Rooms 11,437 11,487 12,166 
Food and beverage 24,795 25,019 26,188 Food and beverage 23,714 24,795 25,019 
Other 6,993 5,927 7,248 Other 6,242 6,993 5,927 
Selling, general and administrative 29,264 29,207 29,719 Selling, general and administrative 29,281 29,264 29,207 
Depreciation 11,837 12,082 15,500 Depreciation 10,710 11,837 12,082 
Write-off of debt issuance costs  370  Write-off of debt issuance costs   370 
Loss on sale of assets 63 4 1 Loss on sale of assets 536 63 4 
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
 Total operating expenses 129,124 130,595 140,246  Total operating expenses 126,451 129,124 130,595 
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
OPERATING INCOMEOPERATING INCOME 30,308 34,082 37,243 OPERATING INCOME 25,504 30,308 34,082 
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
OTHER (INCOME) EXPENSE:OTHER (INCOME) EXPENSE:       OTHER (INCOME) EXPENSE:       
Insurance settlement proceeds  (225)  Insurance settlement proceeds   (225)
Interest income (27) (112) (248)Interest income  (27) (112)
Interest expense, net 15,699 13,299 15,721 Interest expense, net 17,173 15,699 13,299 
Loss on early redemption of debt 134   Loss on early redemption of debt  134  
Interest rate swap income (2,327) (327)  Interest rate swap income (1,014) (2,327) (327)
Other expense 63   Other expense (151) 63  
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
 Total other (income) expense 13,542 12,635 15,473  Total other (income) expense 16,008 13,542 12,635 
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
Income before cumulative effect of change in accounting principleIncome before cumulative effect of change in accounting principle 16,766 21,447 21,770 Income before cumulative effect of change in accounting principle 9,496 16,766 21,447 

Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle

Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle

 


 

(327

)

 


 
Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle   (327)
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
 NET INCOME $16,766 $21,120 $21,770  NET INCOME $9,496 $16,766 $21,120 
 
 
 
   
 
 
 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

88



CIRCUS AND ELDORADO JOINT VENTURE
(doing business as Silver Legacy Resort Casino)



CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF PARTNERS' EQUITY

For the Years Ended December 31, 2003, 2002 2001 and 20002001

(In thousands)

 
 Galleon, Inc.
 Eldorado Resorts, LLC
 Total
 
BALANCE, December 31, 1999 $82,925 $53,722 $136,647 
 
Net income

 

 

9,835

 

 

11,935

 

 

21,770

 
 Partners' distributions  (25,000)   (25,000)
  
 
 
 
Balance, December 31, 2000  67,760  65,657  133,417 
 
Net income

 

 

10,560

 

 

10,560

 

 

21,120

 
 Partners' distributions  (4,565) (4,565) (9,130)
  
 
 
 
Balance, December 31, 2001  73,755  71,652  145,407 
 
Net Income

 

 

8,383

 

 

8,383

 

 

16,766

 
 Partners' distributions  (28,605) (16,502) (45,107)
  
 
 
 
BALANCE, December 31, 2002 $53,533 $63,533 $117,066 
  
 
 
 
 
 Galleon,
Inc.

 Eldorado
Resorts, LLC

 Total
 
BALANCE, January 1, 2001 $67,760 $65,657 $133,417 
 Net income  10,560  10,560  21,120 
 Partners' distributions  (4,565) (4,565) (9,130)
  
 
 
 
Balance, December 31, 2001  73,755  71,652  145,407 
 Net income  8,383  8,383  16,766 
 Partners' distributions  (28,605) (16,502) (45,107)
  
 
 
 
Balance, December 31, 2002  53,533  63,533  117,066 
 Net income  4,748  4,748  9,496 
 Partners' distributions  (2,025) (2,025) (4,050)
  
 
 
 
BALANCE, December 31, 2003 $56,256 $66,256 $122,512 
  
 
 
 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

89



CIRCUS AND ELDORADO JOINT VENTURE
(doing business as Silver Legacy Resort Casino)



CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

For the Years Ended December 31, 2003, 2002 2001 and 20002001

(In thousands)



 2002
 2001
 2000
 
 2003
 2002
 2001
 
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:       CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:       
Net income $9,496 $16,766 $21,120 
Net Income $16,766 $21,120 $21,770   
 
 
 
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:       Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:       
 Depreciation and amortization 12,428 12,485 15,903  Depreciation and amortization 11,432 12,428 12,485 
 Write-off of debt issuance costs  370   Write-off of debt issuance costs   370 
 Loss on sale of assets 63 4 1  Loss on sale of assets 536 63 4 
 Loss on early redemption of debt Write-off of deferred loan costs 134    Loss on early redemption of debt  134  
 Insurance settlement proceeds  (225)   Insurance settlement proceeds   (225)
 Increase in accrued pension cost 750    Increase in accrued pension cost 789 750  
Changes in current assets and current liabilities:       Changes in current assets and current liabilities:       
 Decrease (increase) in accounts receivable, net 727 487 (995) Decrease in accounts receivable, net 97 727 487 
 Decrease (increase) in inventories 54 (154) 264  Decrease (increase) in inventories 66 54 (154)
 (Increase) decrease in prepaid expenses (164) 1,126 (796) (Increase) decrease in prepaid expenses (529) (164) 1,126 
 (Decrease) increase in accounts payable (385) (788) 94  Increase (decrease) in accounts payable 848 (385) (788 
 (Decrease) in accrued guarantee fees to related party (185) (24) (13) (Decrease) in accrued guarantee fees to related party  (185) (24)
 Increase (decrease) in accrued interest 5,292 (1,259) 255  (Decrease) increase in accrued interest (22) 5,292 (1,259)
 (Decrease) increase in accrued and other liabilities (299) (94) 1,027  (Decrease) in accrued and other liabilities (183) (299) (94)
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
Total adjustments 18,415 11,928 15,740  Total adjustments 13,034 18,415 11,928 
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
 Net cash provided by operating activities 35,181 33,048 37,510  Net cash provided by operating activities 22,530 35,181 33,048 
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:       CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:       
 Proceeds from sale of assets 4 6 32 Proceeds from sale of assets 188 4 6 
 (Increase) decrease in other assets (651) 32 (98)(Increase) decrease in other assets (956) (651) 32 
 Insurance settlement proceeds  225  Insurance settlement proceeds   225 
 Purchase of property and equipment (3,837) (4,180) (4,158)Purchase of property and equipment (4,219) (3,837) (4,180)
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
 Net cash used in investing activities (4,484) (3,917) (4,224) Net cash used in investing activities (4,987) (4,484) (3,917)
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:       CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:       
 Proceeds from bank credit facility 36,700 3,000 25,000 Proceeds from bank credit facility 4,500 36,700 3,000 
 Proceeds from issuance of mortgage notes 159,378   Proceeds from issuance of mortgage notes  159,378  
 Distributions to partners (45,107) (9,130) (25,000)Distributions to partners (4,050) (45,107) (9,130)
 Debt issuance costs (6,311) (370)  Debt issuance costs (1) (6,311) (370)
 Payments on bank credit facility (172,700) (21,500) (35,500)Payments on bank credit facility (13,500) (172,700) (21,500)
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
 Net cash used in financing activities (28,040) (28,000) (35,500) Net cash used in financing activities (13,051) (28,040) (28,000)
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
 Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents 2,657 1,131 (2,214) Net increase in cash and cash equivalents 4,492 2,657 1,131 

Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year

 

12,256

 

11,125

 

13,339

 
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year 14,913 12,256 11,125 
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year $14,913 $12,256 $11,125 Cash and cash equivalents at end of year $19,405 $14,913 $12,256 
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
SUPPLEMENTAL CASH FLOW INFORMATION:SUPPLEMENTAL CASH FLOW INFORMATION:       SUPPLEMENTAL CASH FLOW INFORMATION:       
Cash paid during period for interest $7,606 $14,179 $15,075 Cash paid during period for interest $15,461 $9,933 $14,179 
 
 
 
   
 
 
 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

90



CIRCUS AND ELDORADO JOINT VENTURE
(doing business as Silver Legacy Resort Casino)

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Note 1.    Summary of Significant Accounting Policies and Basis of Presentation

    Principles of Consolidation/Operations

        Effective March 1, 1994, Eldorado Limited Liability Company (a Nevada limited liability company owned and controlled by Eldorado Resorts, LLC) ("ELLC") and Galleon, Inc. (a Nevada corporation owned and controlled by Mandalay Resort Group) ("Galleon" and, collectively with ELLC, the "Partners"), entered into a joint venture agreement to establish Circus and Eldorado Joint Venture (the "Joint Venture""Partnership"), a Nevada general partnership. The Joint VenturePartnership owns and operates a casino and hotel located in Reno, Nevada ("Silver Legacy"), which began operations on July 28, 1995. ELLC contributed land to the Joint VenturePartnership with a fair value of $25,000,000 and cash of $26,900,000 for a total equity investment of $51,900,000. Galleon contributed cash to the Joint VenturePartnership of $51,900,000 to comprise their total equity investment. Each partner has a 50% interest in the Joint Venture.Partnership.

        The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Joint VenturePartnership and its wholly owned subsidiary, Silver Legacy Capital Corp. ("Capital"). Capital was established solely for the purpose of serving as a co-issuer of $160 million principal amount of 101/8% mortgage notes due 2012 issued by the Joint VenturePartnership and Capital and, as such, Capital does not have any operations, assets, or revenues. All significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.

    Use of Estimates

        The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from these estimates.

    Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements

            As of January 1, 2001, the Joint Venture changed its method of accounting for interest rate swaps to comply with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 133 ("SFAS 133"), "Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities," and accordingly, changes to the fair value of the interest rate swaps are recognized in earnings. On January 1, 2001, the Joint Venture recorded a liability of $327,000 for the fair value of its interest rate swaps at that date with a corresponding cumulative effect adjustment in its statement of income. The interest rate swaps expired on October 29, 2001; accordingly, the Joint Venture recognized $327,000 as interest rate swap income for the year ended December 31, 2001. See Note 7 for information regarding the Joint Venture's swap agreement entered into in 2002.

        In JuneAugust 2001, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued SFAS No. 143, "Accounting for Asset Retirement Obligations." This statement addresses financial accounting and reporting for obligations associated with the retirementStatement of tangible long-lived assets and the associated asset retirement costs. This statement applies to all entities and to all legal obligations associated with the retirement of long-lived assets that result from the acquisition, construction, development and the normal operation of a long-lived asset, except for certain obligations of lessees. This statement is effective for the Joint Venture's 2003 fiscal year and early adoption is permitted. The Joint Venture believes that the adoption of this statement will not have a material impact on its financial condition or results of operations.

91



        In August 2001, the FASB issued SFASFinancial Accounting Standards ("SFAS") No. 144, "Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets." This statement requires one accounting model be used for long-lived assets to be disposed of by sale, whether previously held and used or newly acquired and broadens the presentation of discontinued operations to include additional disposal transactions. This statement is effective for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2001. The Joint Venture thereforePartnership adopted SFAS No. 144 in January 2002. The Joint VenturePartnership periodically evaluates its long-lived assets for impairment. AdoptionThe adoption of SFAS 144this statement did not have a material impact on the Joint Venture'sits financial condition or results of operations.

        In April 2002, the FASB issued SFAS No. 145, "Rescission of FASB Statements 4, 44, and 64, Amendment of FASB Statement 13, and Technical Corrections." SFAS No. 145 rescinds SFAS No. 4, "Reporting Gains and Losses from Extinguishment of Debt." Under SFAS No. 4, all gains and losses from extinguishment of debt were required to be aggregated, if material, and classified as an extraordinary item, net of related income tax effect, on the statement of income. SFAS No. 145 requires all gains and losses from extinguishment of debt to be classified as extraordinary only if they meet the criteria of Accounting Principles Board ("APB") Opinion 30. This statement is effective for the Joint Venture's 2003 fiscal year and early adoption is permitted. In May 2002, the Joint VenturePartnership adopted this statement and classified its fiscal 2002 loss from early retirement of debt of $134,000 as a component of other (income) expense.

91



        In June 2002, the FASB issued SFAS No. 146, "Accounting for Costs Associated with Exit or Disposal Activities." This statement addresses financial accounting and reporting for costs associated with exit or disposal activities and nullifies EITF No. 94-3, "Liability Recognition for Certain Employee Termination Benefits and Other Costs to Exit an Activity (including Certain Costs Incurred in a Restructuring)." This statement requires that a liability for a cost associated with an exit or disposal activity be recognized when the liability is incurred. A fundamental conclusion reached by the FASB in SFAS No. 146 is that an entity's commitment to a plan, by itself, does not create a present obligation to others that meets the definition of a liability. This statement also establishes that fair value is the objective for initial measurement of the liability. The provisions of this statement arePartnership adopted SFAS No. 146 effective for exit or disposal activities that are initiated after December 31, 2002, with early application encouraged.January 1, 2003. The Joint Venture does not expect the adoption of this statement todid not have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.condition or results of operations.

        In April 2003, the FASB issued SFAS No. 149, "Amendments of Statement No. 133 on Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities." This statement amends SFAS No. 133, "Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities," and clarifies financial accounting and reporting for derivative instruments, including certain derivative instruments embedded in other contracts and hedging activities under SFAS No. 133. This statement is effective for contracts entered into or modified after June 30, 2003, except as stated below and for hedging relationships designated after June 30, 2003. The provisions of this statement that relate to Statement No. 133 Implementation Issues that have been effective for fiscal quarters that began prior to June 15, 2003, should continue to be applied in accordance with their respective effective dates. The adoption of this statement did not have a material impact on the Partnership's results of operations or financial position.

        In May 2003, the FASB issued SFAS No. 150, "Accounting for Certain Financial Instruments with Characteristics of both Liabilities and Equity." This statement establishes standards for how an issuer classifies and measures certain financial instruments with characteristics of both liabilities and equity. Financial instruments that are within the scope of the statement, which previously were often classified as equity, must now be classified as liabilities. This statement was effective for financial instruments entered into or modified after May 31, 2003, and otherwise is generally effective at the beginning of the first interim period beginning after June 15, 2003. The adoption of this statement did nothave a material effect on the Partnership's results of operations or financial position.

        In November 2002, the FASB issued FASB Interpretation No. 45, "Guarantor's Accounting and Disclosure Requirements for Guarantees, Including Indirect Guarantees of Indebtedness of Others" ("FIN No. 45"). FIN No. 45 expands the information disclosures required by guarantors for obligations under certain types of guarantees. It also requires initial recognition at fair value of a liability for such guarantees. The initial recognition and measurement provisions of this interpretation are applicable on a prospective basis to guarantees issued or modified after December 31, 2002. The disclosure requirements of this interpretation are effective for financial statements of interim or annual periods ending after December 15, 2002. Adoption of FIN No. 45 did not have a material impact on the Partnership's financial condition or results of operations.

    Cash and Cash Equivalents

        Cash and cash equivalents include investments purchased with an original maturity of 90 days or less.

    Inventories

        Inventories are stated at the lower of cost, using a first-in, first-out basis, or market value.market.

92


    Property and Equipment

        Property and equipment and other long-lived assets are stated at cost. Depreciation is computed using the straight-line method over the estimated useful life of the asset as follows:

 
 Estimated
Service Life

 
 (Years)

Building and other leasehold improvements 15-45
Furniture, fixtures, and equipment 3-15

92


        Costs of major improvements are capitalized, while costs of normal repairs and maintenance are charged to expense as incurred. Gains or losses on dispositions of property and equipment are included in the determination of operating income.

        Long-lived assets are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. In accordance with SFAS No. 144, an estimate of undiscounted future cash flows produced by the asset is compared to the carrying value to determine whether an impairment exists. If it is determined that the asset is impaired based on expected future cash flows, a loss, measured by the amount by which the carrying amount of the asset exceeds the fair value of the asset, would be recognized.

    Capitalization of Interest

        The Joint Venture'sPartnership's policy is to capitalize interest on funds disbursed during the active construction and development phases of its facilities and other major projects. There was no interest capitalized in 2003, 2002 2001 or 2000.2001.

    Casino Revenues and Promotional Allowances

        In accordance with industry practice, the Joint VenturePartnership recognizes as casino revenue the net win from gaming activities, which is the difference between gaming wins and losses. The retail value of food, beverage, rooms and other services furnished to customers on a complimentary basis is included in gross revenues and then deducted as promotional allowances. The retail value of complimentaries included in promotional allowances is as follows (in thousands):


 Years ended December 31,
 Years ended December 31,

 2002
 2001
 2000
 2003
 2002
 2001
Food and beverage $4,126 $4,054 $4,018 $4,543 $4,126 $4,054
Rooms 9,593 9,753 10,591 9,261 9,593 9,753
Other 1,173 791 1,097 1,107 1,173 791
 
 
 
 
 
 
 $14,892 $14,598 $15,706 $14,911 $14,892 $14,598
 
 
 
 
 
 

        The estimated costs of providing such complimentary services are included in casino costs and expenses and consist of the following (in thousands):


 Years ended December 31,
 Years ended December 31,

 2002
 2001
 2000
 2003
 2002
 2001
Food and beverage $6,393 $6,589 $6,889 $6,200 $6,393 $6,589
Rooms 1,267 1,263 1,285 1,455 1,267 1,263
Other 1,128 867 1,230 1,009 1,128 867
 
 
 
 
 
 
 $8,788 $8,719 $9,404 $8,664 $8,788 $8,719
 
 
 
 
 
 

93


    Advertising

        Advertising costs are expensed in the period the advertising initially takes place. Advertising costs included in selling, general and administrative expenses were $5,437,000, $5,532,000 $6,191,000 and $6,748,000$6,191,000 for the years ended December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001, and 2000, respectively.

    Federal Income Taxes

        The Joint VenturePartnership is not subject to income taxes; therefore, no provision for income taxes has been made, as the Partners include their respective share of the Joint VenturePartnership income in their income

93



tax returns. The Joint VenturePartnership Agreement provides for the Joint VenturePartnership to make distributions to the Partners in an amount equal to the maximum marginal federal income tax rate applicable to any Partner multiplied by the income of the Joint VenturePartnership for the applicable period (see Note 11).

        The reported amounts of the Joint Venture'sPartnership's assets and liabilities exceeded the net tax basis by $42,836,000$47,005,600 and $44,151,000$42,836,000 at December 31, 2003 and 2002, and 2001, respectively.

    Fair Value of Financial Instruments

        Management        Except for the Partnership's 101/8% mortgage notes, management is of the opinion that the fair value of all of its financial instruments are not materially different from their carrying values. The approximate fair value of the Joint Venture's 10?Partnership's 101/8% Mortgage Notes,mortgage notes, based on quoted market prices, was approximately $157.6 million$165,600,000 at December 31, 2002.2003. The fair value is not necessarily indicative of the amount the Joint VenturePartnership could realize in a current market exchange.

    ReclassificationsChanges in Estimates

        Certain reclassifications have been madeCash and cash equivalents include a slot machine bill acceptor accrual, which represents estimated uncounted cash in slot machine bill acceptors. During the year ended December 31, 2003, the Partnership converted to a new slot accounting system. Based on a change in the prior year financial statementsestimated uncounted cash utilizing the new system's reporting capabilities, this accrual was reduced by $1,630,000 at December 31, 2003 resulting in a corresponding decrease in casino revenues.

        At December 31, 2003, the Partnership increased casino revenues by $964,000 for outstanding chips and tokens that are not expected to conform to current year presentation, and have no effect on net income.be redeemed by customers.

Note 2.    Certain Risks and Uncertainties

        A significant portion of the Joint Venture'sPartnership's revenues and operating income are generated from patrons who are residents of northern California. A change in general economic conditions or the extent and nature of casino gaming in California, Washington or Oregon could adversely affect the Joint Venture'sPartnership's operating results. On September 10, 1999, California lawmakers approved a constitutional amendment that would give IndianNative American tribes the right to offer slot machines and a range of house-banked card games. On March 7, 2000, California voters approved the constitutional amendment which legalized "Nevada-style" gaming on Native American reservations.

        The United Auburn Indian Community ("UAIC") has entered into While most existing Native American gaming facilities in northern California are modest compared to Silver Legacy, numerous Native American tribes have announced that they are in the process of expanding, developing, or are considering establishing large-scale hotel and gaming facilities in northern California. In particular, a development and management agreement with an established gaming operator, Station Casinos, Inc., to develop and manage a gaming and entertainment facility on a 49-acre sitesignificant new Native American casino located approximately 21 miles northeast of Sacramento. On September 17, 2002, the United States Department of Interior accepted the 49-acre site into trust for the UAIC, and Station Casinos, Inc. announced an approximately $215 million, 200,000 square foot gaming and entertainment facility which is anticipated to openSacramento opened in June or July 2003. While this new casino does not have hotel rooms, its gaming facilities are comparable in size to Silver Legacy with approximately 1,900 slot machines and 100 table games. Subsequent to its opening date in June through December 31, 2003, we experienced a moderate decrease in our weekend casino volume resulting in a negative effect on our overall operating results. Based on its size and proximity, and potential expansion capabilities, we believe the opening of this new facility will impactcasino, along

94



with the continued growth of other Native American gaming establishments, could continue to place additional competitive pressure on our operations.operating results. While we cannot predict the extent of the potentialany future impact, it could be significant.

Note 3.    Accounts Receivable

        Components of accounts receivable, net at December 31, 20022003 and 20012002 are as follows (in thousands):


 2002
 2001
  2003
 2002
 
Casino receivables $3,545 $3,654  $3,412 $3,545 
Hotel receivables 1,498 1,783  1,351 1,498 
Other receivables 160 167  74 160 
 
 
  
 
 
 5,203 5,604  4,837 5,203 
Less: allowance for doubtful accounts (1,630) (1,304) (1,361) (1,630)
 
 
  
 
 
Accounts receivable, net $3,573 $4,300  $3,476 $3,573 
 
 
  
 
 

94


        The provision for bad debt expense for the years ended December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001, was $437,000, $835,000 and 2000, was $835,000, $864,000, and $596,000, respectively.

        Included in Otherother receivables are $64,000$21,000 and $95,000$64,000 due from Eldorado Hotel & Casino and $68,000$37,500 and $59,000$68,000 due from Circus Circus Hotel and Casino-RenoCasino—Reno as of December 31, 20022003 and 2001,2002, respectively.

Note 4.    Property and Equipment

        Property and equipment at December 31, 20022003 and 20012002 consisted of the following (in thousands):


 2002
 2001
  2003
 2002
 
Land and Improvements $28,405 $28,405 
Land and improvements $28,405 $28,405 
Building and other leasehold improvements 271,506 271,517  271,061 271,506 
Furniture, fixtures, and equipment 85,802 84,260  85,211 85,802 
Construction in progress 1,001 38   1,001 
 
 
  
 
 
 386,714 384,220  384,677 386,714 
Less: Accumulated depreciation (113,774) (103,245)
Less: accumulated depreciation (118,825) (113,774)
 
 
  
 
 
Property and equipment, net $272,940 $280,975  $265,852 $272,940 
 
 
  
 
 

        Substantially all property and equipment of the Joint VenturePartnership collateralize the Bank Credit Facility (see Note 7).

95



Note 5.    Other Assets

        Other assets, net at December 31, 20022003 and 20012002 consisted of the following (in thousands):


 2002
 2001
 2003
 2002
China, glassware, silverware and linens $298 $289 $316 $298
Debt issuance costs, net 5,772 202 5,114 5,772
Intangible asset related to SERP (see Note 9) 1,105 
Intangible asset related to SERP 1,015 1,105
Cash surrender value of life insurance policies 732  1,678 732
Other 62 84 53 62
 
 
 
 
 $7,969 $575 $8,176 $7,969
 
 
 
 

        The initial inventory of china, glassware, silverware and linens is being amortized to 50% of cost with the balance kept as base stock. Subsequent purchases of china, glassware, silverware and linens are expensed as used.

        The Joint VenturePartnership incurred costs in connection with its issuance of mortgage notes and in connection with its new bank credit facilities.facility (see Note 7). Debt issuance costs are capitalized when incurred and amortized to interest expense based on the related debt maturities using the straight-line method, which approximates the effective interest method. The unamortized balance of $202,000 at December 31, 2001 was related to our previous bank credit facility, of which $134,000 was remaining and written-off upon repayment in full on March 5, 2002 in conjunction with our mortgage notes offering. At December 31, 2002,2003, the unamortized balance related to ourthe Partnership's new bank credit facility was $229,000$174,000 and will beis amortized over the remaining term of the facility through March 31, 2007. Costs incurred during the year ended December 31, 2001 in connection with our notes offering in the amount of $370,000 were written off due to the postponement of the offering for greater than 90 days. Included in other assets at December 31, 20022003 was $5,543,000$4,940,000 in costs related to the completed offering of

95



mortgage notes (see Note 7).notes. The amortization of debt issuance costs included in interest expense was $606,000, $403,000$722,000, $657,000 and $403,000 for the years ended December 31, 2003, 2002 2001 and 2000.2001.

        The Joint VenturePartnership accounts for the SERP according to Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 87, "Employers' Accounting for Pensions" ("SFAS 87") (see Note 9). Since the accumulated benefit obligation, which is the present value of benefits to be paid based on services provided and existing compensation levels, exceeds the fair value of plan assets, SFAS 87 requires the recognition of a liability (including unfunded accrued pension cost) that is at least equal to the unfunded accumulated benefit obligation. An intangible asset of $1,105,000$1,015,000 at December 31, 20022003 has been established for the difference between such liability and the unfunded accrued pension cost.

Note 6.    Accrued and Other Liabilities

        Accrued and other liabilities at December 31, 20022003 and 20012002 consisted of the following (in thousands):


 2002
 2001
 2003
 2002
Accrued payroll and related $2,588 $1,825 $2,832 $2,588
Accrued vacation 1,388 1,512 1,468 1,388
Unclaimed chips and tokens 469 874
Progressive slot liability 1,022 1,047
Other 4,375 5,313 2,377 2,454
 
 
 
 
 $8,351 $8,650 $8,168 $8,351
 
 
 
 

96


Note 7.    Long-Term Debt

        Long-term debt at December 31, 20022003 and 20012002 consisted of the following (in thousands):

 
 2002
 2001
 
Amounts due under bank credit facilities at floating interest rates, weighted average of 4.57% and 3.08%, respectively, due March 2007 $9,000 $145,000 
101/8% Mortgage Notes due 2012 (net of unamortized discount of $570)  159,430   
  
 
 
   168,430  145,000 
Less current portion    (10,000)
  
 
 
  $168,430 $135,000 
  
 
 
 
 2003
 2002
Amount due under bank credit facilities at floating interest rates, 2002 weighted average of 4.57%, due March 2007 $ $9,000
101/8% Mortgage Notes due 2012 (net of unamortized discounts of $508 and $570)  159,492  159,430
  
 
   159,492  168,430
Less current portion    
  
 
  $159,492 $168,430
  
 

        Scheduled maturities of long-term debt are as follows at December 31, 20022003 (in thousands):

2003 $
2004  $
2005 2,000 
2006 6,000 
2007 1,000 
2008 
Thereafter 159,430 159,492
 
 
 $168,430 $159,492
 
 

96


        On March 5, 2002, the Joint VenturePartnership and Capital (the "Issuers") completed an offeringissued $160,000,000 principal amount of senior secured mortgage notes due 2012 ("Notes") with a principal amount of $160,000,000 due 2012.. Concurrent with issuing the Notes, the Joint VenturePartnership entered into a new senior secured credit facility (the "New Credit Facility") for $40,000,000. The proceeds from the Notes, together with $26,000,000 in borrowings under the New Credit Facility, were used to repay $150,200,000 representing all of the indebtedness outstanding under the prior bank credit facility (the "Bank Credit Facility") and to fund $30,000,000 of distributions to the Partners. In addition, the remaining proceeds along with operating cash flows were used to pay $6,300,000 in related fees and expenses of the transactions. These fees were capitalized and are included in other assets (see Note 5). Deferred loan costs of $134,000 related to the Bank Credit Facility were written-off upon repayment in full of the Bank Credit Facility.

        The Notes are senior secured obligations which rank equally with all of the Joint Venture'sPartnership's outstanding senior debt and senior to any subordinated debt. The Notes are secured by a security interest in the Issuers' existing and future assets, which is junior to a security interest in such assets securing the Joint Venture'sPartnership's obligations on the New Credit Facility and any refinancings of such facility that are permitted pursuant to the terms of the Notes. Each of the Partners executed a pledge of all of its partnership interests in the Joint VenturePartnership to secure the Notes, which is junior to a pledge of such partnership interests to secure the Joint Venture'sPartnership's obligations on the New Credit Facility and any refinancings of such facility that are permitted pursuant to the terms of the Notes. The Notes mature on March 1, 2012 and bear interest at the rate of 101/8% per annum, payable semi-annually in arrears on March 1 and September 1 of each year, commencing on September 1, 2002.

        The New Credit Facility providesoriginally provided for a $20,000,000 senior secured revolving credit facility and a $20,000,000 five-year term loan facility, each of which bearsprovided for the payment of interest at floating rates based on LIBOR plus a spread. The commitment under the term loan facility reducesoriginally provided for reductions as follows: $1,000,000 per quarter beginning March 31, 2003 through December 31, 2004; $1,250,000 per quarter beginning March 31, 2005 through December 31, 2005; $1,500,000 per quarter beginning March 31, 2006 through December 31, 2006, with the remaining

97



balances due March 31, 2007. During the year ended December 31, 2002,2003, the Joint VenturePartnership paid $11,000,000the remaining $9,000,000 outstanding on itsthe term loan facility which constituted a permanent reduction of that amount inloan; consequently, the term loan facility. Aswas paid in full as of December 31, 2002,2003. During the year ended December 31, 2003, $4,500,000 was borrowed and subsequently repaid under its most restrictive covenants, the Joint Venture had the ability to borrow an additional $10,500,000revolving portion of the $20,000,000 available under its revolving credit facility.

        The Notes and New Credit Facility contain various restrictive covenants including the maintenance of certain financial ratios and limitations on additional debt, disposition of property, mergers and similar transactions. On November 4, 2003, the Partnership executed an amendment to the New Credit Facility (as amended, the "Amended Credit Facility") which reduced the revolving facility to $10,000,000, and revised certain covenant ratios with retroactive effect to September 30, 2003, including the maximum total debt to EBITDA ratio which the Partnership had exceeded as of September 30, 2003. At December 31, 2003, there was no indebtedness outstanding under the Amended Credit Facility. As of December 31, 2002,such date, the Joint VenturePartnership was in compliance with all of its covenants.the covenants in the Amended Credit Facility and had the ability to borrow all of the $10,000,000 available under the revolving portion of the Amended Credit Facility. The entire principal amount then outstanding under the Amended Credit Facility becomes due and payable on March 31, 2007 unless the maturity date is extended with the consent of the lenders. As of December 31, 2003, the Partnership was in compliance with the covenants in the indenture relating to the Notes.

        On June 13, 2002,April 8, 2003, the Joint VenturePartnership entered into a fixed-to-floating swap agreement with a $50 million$60,000,000 notional amount. Pursuant to this swap agreement, which had an expiration date of March 1, 2006, the Joint VenturePartnership received interest at a fixed rate of 10.125% per annum and paid interest based on a floating rate index that was computed on a 6-month LIBOR, in arrears, plus 7.36%. The amounts due under the swap agreement were payable on September 1 and March 1 of each year, beginning September 1, 2003. On June 11, 2003, the Partnership terminated the swap agreement in advance of its scheduled termination date and received $1,014,000 representing the fair market value of the swap. This interest rate swap did not meet the criteria for hedge accounting established by SFAS No. 133, "Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities;" therefore, the entire cash receipt was recorded as interest rate swap income.

        On June 13, 2002, the Partnership entered into a fixed-to-floating swap agreement with a $50,000,000 notional amount. Pursuant to this swap agreement, which had an expiration date of March 1, 2006, the Partnership received interest at a fixed rate of 10.125% per annum and paid interest based on a floating rate index that was computed on a 6-month LIBOR, in arrears, plus 5.31%. The amounts due under the swap agreement were payable on September 1 and March 1 of each year, beginning September 1, 2002. The difference between the amount received and amount paid under such agreement was recorded as a reduction of, or addition to interest expense as incurred over the life of the swap (a reduction of $288,000 for the year ended December 31, 2002). The interest rate swap did not meet the criteria for hedge accounting established by SFAS No. 133. Accordingly, prior to its termination date, the fair market value of the swap was recorded as an asset or liability in accordance with SFAS No. 133. On October 8, 2002, the Joint VenturePartnership terminated the swap agreement in advance of its scheduled termination date and received $2,327,000 which was recorded as interest rate swap income.

97



Note 8.    Related Parties

        Each of our Partners operates a casino attached and adjacent to Silver Legacy. Our Partners may be deemed to be in a conflict of interest position with respect to decisions they make relating to the Joint Venture,Partnership, the Eldorado Hotel & Casino and Circus Circus Hotel & Casino-Reno.Casino—Reno.

98


        As a condition to the Bank Credit Facility, Mandalay Resort Group ("MRG") guaranteed completion of the Silver Legacy and, in addition, entered into a make-well agreement whereby it was obligated to make additional contributions to the Joint VenturePartnership as necessary to maintain a minimum coverage ratio (as defined). As compensation for the make-well agreement, MRG received a guarantee fee of 11/2% of the outstanding balance of the Bank Credit Facility. The Joint VenturePartnership made payments totaling $563,000 $2,311,000 and $2,523,000$2,311,000 on its guarantee fee commitment for the years ended December 31, 2002 2001 and 2000,2001, respectively. On March 5, 2002, MRG's obligations pursuant to the make-well agreement, and its right to receive the guarantee fee, terminated. All unpaid guarantee fees were paid in full in March 2002.

        Silver Legacy has utilized a King Air aircraft owned by Recreational Enterprises, Inc. ("REI") for the purpose of providing air service to select customers. During the years ended December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001, and 2000, the Joint VenturePartnership paid REI $14,800, $34,000 $31,000 and $17,000,$31,000, respectively, for such services. Although there is no agreement obligating the Joint VenturePartnership to utilize the plane or entitling it to do so, it is anticipated that the Joint VenturePartnership will continue to utilize this service from time to time in the future on terms mutually acceptable to the parties. REI, which owns 55% of ELLC, is owned by various members of the Carano family, including Gary L. Carano, Silver Legacy's General Manager, Glenn T. Carano, Silver Legacy's Executive Director of Marketing, and Gene R. Carano, a member of the Joint Venture'sPartnership's Executive Committee, each of whom owns an approximately 10.1% beneficial interest in REI, and Donald L. Carano, the father of Gary, Glenn and Gene Carano, who owns an approximately 49.5% interest in REI.

        Silver Legacy's marketing and sales departments have utilized a yacht owned by Sierra Adventure Equipment Leasing, Inc. ("Sierra Leasing") at a flat rate per trip of $2,500 ($1,250 if the trip was shared with our Partner, ELLC) for various promotional events. The payments made by the Joint VenturePartnership to Sierra Leasing for the use of the yacht totaled $6,300, $24,000 and $21,000 during 2003, 2002 and $31,000 during 2002, 2001, and 2000, respectively. Although there is no agreement obligating the Joint VenturePartnership to utilize the yacht or entitling it to do so, it is anticipated that the Joint VenturePartnership will continue to utilize this service from time to time in the future on terms mutually acceptable to the parties. Sierra Leasing is owned by Donald L. Carano, the father of Gary L. Carano, Silver Legacy's General Manager, Glenn T. Carano, Silver Legacy's Executive Director of Marketing, and Gene R. Carano, a member of the Joint Venture'sPartnership's executive committee.

        Eldorado Resorts LLC owns the skywalk that connects Silver Legacy with the Eldorado Hotel & Casino. The charges from the service provider for the utilities associated with this skywalk are billed to the Partnership together with the charges for the utilities associated with Silver Legacy. Such charges are paid to the service provider by the Partnership, and the Partnership is reimbursed by Eldorado Resorts LLC for the portion of the charges allocable to the utilities provided to the skywalk. The charges for the utilities provided to the skywalk during the years ended December 31, 2003, 2002, and 2001 were $68,100, $63,800, and $67,900, respectively.

        Since 1998, the Partnership has purchased from Eldorado Resorts LLC homemade pasta and other products for use in the restaurants at Silver Legacy and it is anticipated that the Partnership will continue to make similar purchases in the future. For purchases of these products during the years ended December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001, which are billed to the Partnership at cost plus associated labor, the Partnership paid Eldorado Resorts LLC $56,600, $53,700, and $47,000, respectively.

        In 1998, the Joint VenturePartnership began purchasing advertising materials from Lexicon Design, Inc., a corporation which is wholly-owned by the wife of Silver Legacy's Executive Director of Marketing. The Partnership did not utilize Lexicon Design, Inc. in 2003 or 2002. Payments made by the Joint VenturePartnership to Lexicon Design, Inc. were $0, $428,000 and $364,000 for the yearsyear ended December 31, 2002, 2001 and 2000, respectively.totaled $428,000.

        In April 2001, the Joint VenturePartnership began utilizing 235 spaces in the parking garage at Circus Circus Hotel and Casino-Reno. The spaces are utilized to provide parking for employees of Silver Legacy. In

99



consideration for its use of the spaces, the Joint VenturePartnership pays Circus Circus Hotel and Casino-Reno rent in the amount of $5,000 per month. Although there is no agreement obligating the Joint VenturePartnership to continue utilizing the spaces or entitling it to do so, it is anticipated that the Joint VenturePartnership will continue this agreement for the foreseeable future.

98



Note 9.    Employee Retirement Plans

        The Joint VenturePartnership instituted a defined contribution 401(k) plan in September 1995 which covers all employees who meet certain age and length of service requirements and allows an employer contribution up to 25 percent of the first six percent of each participating employee's compensation. Plan participants can elect to defer before tax compensation through payroll deductions. Those deferrals are regulated under Section 401(k) of the Internal Revenue Code. The Joint Venture'sPartnership's matching contributions were $253,000, $286,000 $318,000 and $320,000,$318,000, respectively, for the years ended December 31, 2003, 2002 2001 and 2000.2001.

        Effective January 1, 2002, the Joint VenturePartnership adopted a Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan ("SERP") for a select group of highly compensated management employees. The SERP provides for a lifetime benefit at age 65, based on a formula which takes into account a participant's highest annual compensation, years of service, and executive level. The SERP also provides an early retirement benefit at age 55 with at least four years of service, a disability provision, and a lump sum death benefit. The obligation is being funded through life insurance contracts on the participants and related cash surrender value.

100



        The following information summarizes activity in the SERP for the yearyears ended December 31, 2003 and 2002 (in thousands):



 2003
 2002
 
Changes in Projected Benefit ObligationChanges in Projected Benefit Obligation   Changes in Projected Benefit Obligation     
Projected benefit obligation at beginning of year $2,037 Projected benefit obligation at beginning of year $2,564 $2,037 
Service cost 376 Service cost 390 376 
Interest cost 148 Interest cost 172 148 
Actuarial losses 3 Actuarial losses 306 3 
 
   
 
 
Projected benefit obligation at end of year $2,564  Projected benefit obligation at end of year $3,432 $2,564 
 
   
 
 
Fair Value of Plan Assets (1)Fair Value of Plan Assets (1) $ Fair Value of Plan Assets (1) $ $ 
 
   
 
 
Reconciliation of Funded StatusReconciliation of Funded Status   Reconciliation of Funded Status     
Funded status $(2,564)Funded status $(3,432)$(2,564)
Unrecognized actuarial loss 3 Unrecognized actuarial loss 309 3 
Unrecognized prior service cost 1811 Unrecognized prior service cost 1,584 1,811 
 
   
 
 
Accrued net periodic pension cost $(750) Accrued net pension cost $(1,539)$(750)
 
   
 
 
Amounts Recognized in the Consolidated Balance Sheet   
Amounts Recognized on Consolidated Balance SheetsAmounts Recognized on Consolidated Balance Sheets     
Accrued net periodic pension cost $(750)Accrued net pension cost $(1,539)$(750)
Additional minimum liability (1,105)Additional minimum liability (1,015) (1,105)
Intangible asset 1,105 Intangible asset 1,015 1,105 
Accumulated other comprehensive loss  Accumulated other comprehensive loss   
 
   
 
 
Net liability reflected in consolidated balance sheet $(750) Net liability reflected on Consolidated Balance Sheets $(1,539)$(750)
 
   
 
 
Components of Net Periodic Pension Cost   
Components of Net Pension CostComponents of Net Pension Cost     
Current period service cost $376 Current period service cost $390 $376 
Interest cost 148 Interest cost 172 148 
Amortization of prior service cost 226 Amortization of prior service cost 227 226 
Recognized net actuarial loss  Recognized net actuarial loss   
 
   
 
 
Net expense $750  Net expense $789 $750 
 
   
 
 
Weighted Average AssumptionsWeighted Average Assumptions   Weighted Average Assumptions     
Discount rate 6.7%Discount rate 6.0% 6.7%
Rate of compensation increase 3.5%Rate of compensation increase 3.5% 3.5%

(1)
While the SERP is an unfunded plan, the Joint VenturePartnership is informally funding the plan through life insurance contracts on the participants. The life insurance contracts had cash surrender values

99


    totaling $1,678,000 and $732,000 at December 31, 2002.2003 and 2002, respectively. The life insurance contracts had a face value of $10,950,000 at December 31, 2003 and 2002.

Note 10.    Commitments and Contingencies

    Letters of Credit

        The New Bank Credit Facility does not allow for the issuance of letters of credit beyond the revolving portion of ourthe Bank Credit Facility of which none was outstanding as of December 31, 2002. The prior Bank Credit Facility allowed for the issuance of letters of credit of up to $5,000,000. As of December 31, 2001, the Joint Venture had not drawn against these letters of credit.2003.

101


    Operating Leases

        The Joint VenturePartnership leases (land)land and equipment under operating leases. Future mimimumminimum payments (expiring from 2003 and thereafter) under noncancellable operating leases with initial terms of one year or more consisted of the following at December 31, 2002:2003:

2003 $58,900
2004 36,300 $79,100
2005 20,300 63,100
2006 4,300 26,800
2007  
2008 
 
 
 $119,800 $169,000
 
 

        Total rental expense under operating leases was $278,000, $402,000 $548,000 and $482,000$548,000 for the years ended December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001, and 2000, respectively.

    Litigation

        The Joint VenturePartnership is party to various litigation arising in the normal course of business. Management is of the opinion that the ultimate resolution of these matters will not have a material effect on the financial position or the results of operations of the Joint Venture.Partnership.

Note 11.    Joint VenturePartnership Agreement

        Under the Joint Venture'sPartnership's original partnership agreement, as long as ELLC had the right to select the General Manager of the Silver Legacy, Galleon was entitled annually on a non-cumulative basis, commencing with the eight-month period ending December 31, 1997 and for each subsequent 12-month period, to a priority allocation of the Joint Venture'sPartnership's operating income (the "Priority Allocation") in an amount equal to approximately 11.54% of the average of the "Adjusted Initial Investment" (as defined) for the period. If, after deducting equal shares of interest expense, a Partner's share of the priority allocation is less than zero, additional operating income is allocated to that Partner to bring their allocation to zero. For purposes of determining the amount of the Priority Allocation for any period, the term "Adjusted Initial Investment" means $290,000,000 (the "Initial Investment") as adjusted at the end of the year by subtracting (i) the depreciation on the Initial Investment taken in such year in accordance with the depreciation schedule agreed to by the Partners and (ii) the principal payments which would have been made in repayment of the original bank financing utilized for the development, construction and completion of the Silver Legacy.

        As a result of the Priority Allocation, each of the Partners received 50% of the operating income through April 30, 1997 and Galleon received 100% of operating income for the remaining eight months ending December 31, 1997 and for the twelve months ending December 31, 1998. The total allocations

100



to the two Partners for the years ended December 31, 2001 and 2000, were $10,560,000 and $11,935,000 to ELLC and $10,560,000 and $9,835,000 to Galleon, respectively. The allocation to ELLC for the year ended December 31, 2000 included $1,050,000 to adjust for an excess allocation in the same amount to Galleon for the year ended December 31, 1999.

        Concurrent with the issuance of the Notes on March 5, 2002, the Joint Venture'sPartnership's original partnership agreement was amended and restated in its entirety and was further amended in April 2002 (the "New Partnership Agreement"). The New Partnership Agreement provides for, among other items, profits and losses to be allocated to the Partners in proportion to their percentage interests, separate capital accounts to be maintained for each Partner, provisions for management of the Joint VenturePartnership and payment of distributions and bankruptcy and/or dissolution of the Joint Venture.Partnership. The April 2002 amendments were principally (i) to provide equal voting rights for ELLC and Galleon with respect to approval of the

102



partnership's annual business plan and the appointment and compensation of the general manager, and (ii) to give each Partner the right to terminate the general manager.

        Total distributions for the year ended December 31, 2003 totaled $4.0 million and included: (i) a distribution of $1.7 million each to ELLC and Galleon representing fiscal 2003 tax distributions, and (ii) a distribution of $0.3 million each to ELLC and Galleon representing fiscal 2002 tax distributions. Total distributions for the year ended December 31, 2002 were $16,502,000 and $28,605,000 to ELLC and Galleon, respectively. The 2002 distributions included: (i) a distribution to ELLC and Galleon of $1,200,000 each representing a fourth quarter 2001 tax distribution, (ii) a distribution of $2,600,000 each to ELLC and Galleon representing fiscal year 2000 tax distributions, (iii) a $2,103,000 distribution representing the remaining Priority Allocation payment to MRG pursuant to the Joint Venture'sPartnership's original partnership agreement, (iv) a special distribution concurrent with the Notes Offering to ELLC and Galleon of $10,000,000 and $20,000,000, respectively, and (v) a distribution of $2,702,000 each to ELLC and Galleon representing fiscal year 2002 tax distributions.distribution.

101




EXHIBITS INDEX

EXHIBIT
NUMBER

 DESCRIPTION OF EXHIBIT
2.1 Eldorado Resorts LLC Articles of Merger. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 to the Registrants' Form S-4 Registration Statement—Securities and Exchange Commission File No. 333-11811)

2.2

 

Agreement and Plan of Merger dated as of June 28, 1996 by and between Eldorado Hotel Associates Limited Partnership and Eldorado Resorts LLC. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.2 to the Registrants' Form S-4 Registration Statement—Securities and Exchange Commission File No. 333-11811)

3.1

 

Articles of Organization of Eldorado Capital Corp. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Registrants' Form S-4 Registration Statement—Securities and Exchange Commission File No. 333-11811)

3.2

 

Articles of Incorporation of Eldorado Capital Corp. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to the Registrants' Form S-4 Registration Statement—Securities and Exchange Commission File No. 333-11811)

3.3

 

Operating Agreement of Eldorado Resorts LLC dated as of June 28, 1996 by and among Recreational Enterprises Inc., Hotel-Casino Management, Inc., Hotel Casino Realty Investments, Inc., Donald L. Carano and Ludwig J. Corrao. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.3 to the Registrant'sRegistrants' Form S-4 Registration Statement—Securities and Exchange Commission File No. 333-11811)

3.4

 

Bylaws of Eldorado Capital Corp. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.4 to the Registrants' Form S-4 Registration Statement—Securities and Exchange Commission File No. 333-11811)

4.1

 

Indenture dated July 31, 1996 between Eldorado Resorts, Eldorado Capital Corp. and Fleet National Bank, as trustee, and Form of Exchange Note. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Registrants' Form S-4 Registration Statement—Securities and Exchange Commission File No. 333-11811)

4.2

 

Registration Rights Agreement dated as of July 31, 1996 by and among Eldorado Resorts LLC, Eldorado Capital Corp., Bear, Stearns & Co. Inc., Wassertstein Perella Securities, Inc. and BA Securities, Inc. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to the Registrants' Form S-4 Registration Statement—Securities and Exchange Commission File No. 333-11811)

4.3

 

Second Amended and Restated Loan Agreement dated as of June 29, 2001 among Eldorado Resorts LLC and Bank of America, N.A. (formerly Bank of America National Trust and Savings Association), as sole initial Bank, Issuing Bank and Administrative Agent. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.8 to the Registrants' Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2001)

4.4

 

Amendment No. 1 to Second Amended and Restated Loan Agreement, dated as of December 31, 2001, by and among Eldorado Resorts LLC, the banks referred to therein, and Bank of America, N.A., as administrative agent, and related consents of Eldorado Capital Corporation and the lenders. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4 to the Registrants' Form 8-K dated December 31, 2001)

4.5

 

Interest Rate Swap Agreement, dated as of August 6, 2002, by and between Eldorado Resorts LLC and Bank of America, N.A. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Registrants' Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2002)

104



4.6

 

Termination Agreement of Interest Rate Swap, dated as of October 10, 2002, by and between Eldorado Resorts LLC and Bank of America, N.A. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to the Registrants' Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2002)

4.7

 

Interest Rate Swap Agreement, dated as of November 12, 2002, by and between Eldorado Resorts LLC and Bank of America, N.A. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.7 to the Registrants' Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002)



102



4.8

 

Termination Agreement of Interest Rate Swap, dated as of February 12, 2003, by and between Eldorado Resorts LLC and Bank of America, N.A. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.8 to the Registrants' Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002)

4.9


Amendment No. 2 to Second Amended and Restated Loan Agreement, dated as of September 10, 2003, by and among Eldorado Resorts LLC, the banks referred to therein, and Bank of America, N.A., as administrative agent, and related consents of Eldorado Capital Corporation and the lenders. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Registrants' Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2003)

4.10


Promissory Note dated as of August 21, 2003, by and between Eldorado Resorts LLC, and the City of Reno. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to the Registrants' Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2003)

10.1.1

 

Agreement of Joint Venture of Circus and Eldorado Joint Venture dated as of March 1, 1994 by and between Eldorado Limited Liability Company and Galleon, Inc. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrants' Form S-4 Registration Statement—Securities and Exchange Commission File No. 333-11811)

10.1.2

 

Amended and Restated Agreement of Joint Venture of Circus and Eldorado Joint Venture by and between Eldorado Limited Liability Company and Galleon, Inc. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1.2 to the Registrants' Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2001)

10.1.3

 

Amended and Restated Agreement of Joint Venture of Circus and Eldorado Joint Venture by and between Eldorado Limited Liability Company and Galleon, Inc. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.3 to the Form S-4 Registration Statement of Circus and Eldorado Joint Venture and Silver Legacy Capital Corp.—Commission File Nos. 333-87202 and 333-87202-01)

10.2.1

 

Management Agreement dated as of June 28, 1996 by and between Eldorado Resorts LLC, Recreational Enterprises, Inc. and Hotel-Casino Management, Inc. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Registrants' Form S-4 Registration Statement—Securities and Exchange Commission File No. 333-11811)

10.2.2

 

Written Consent in Lieu of Meeting of Members of Eldorado Limited Liability Company (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10 to the Registrants' quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 1998)

10.3

 

Indemnity Agreement dated as of July 25, 1996 between Eldorado Resorts LLC and Eldorado Capital Corp. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to the Registrants' Form S-4 Registration Statement—Securities and Exchange Commission File No. 333-11811)

10.4

 

Purchase Agreement and Joint Escrow Instructions dated June 26, 1996 by and between Daniel's Motor Lodge, Inc. and Eldorado Hotel Associates Limited Partnership. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 to the Registrants' Form S-4 Registration Statement—Securities and Exchange Commission File No. 333-11811)

105



10.5.1

 

Lease dated July 21, 1972 by and between C. S. & Y. Associates and Eldorado Hotel Associates. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.6.1 to the Registrants' Form S-4 Registration Statement—Securities and Exchange Commission File No. 333-11811)

10.5.2

 

Addendum to Lease dated March 20, 1973 by and between C. S. & Y. Associates and Eldorado Hotel Associates. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.6.2 to the Registrants' Form S-4 Registration Statement—Securities and Exchange Commission File No. 333-11811)

10.5.3

 

Amendment to Lease dated January 1, 1978 by and between C. S. & Y. Associates and Eldorado Hotel Associates. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.6.3 to the Registrants' Form S-4 Registration Statement—Securities and Exchange Commission File No. 333-11811)

10.5.4

 

Amendment to Lease dated January 31, 1985 by and between C. S. & Y. Associates and Eldorado Hotel Associates. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.6.4 to the Registrants' Form S-4 Registration Statement—Securities and Exchange Commission File No. 333-11811)

10.5.5

 

Third Amendment to Lease dated December 24, 1987 by and between C. S. & Y. Associates and Eldorado Hotel Associates. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.6.5 to the Registrants' Form S-4 Registration Statement—Securities and Exchange Commission File No. 333-11811)

10.6*

 

Eldorado Hotel Associates Limited Partnership 1995 Performance and Appreciation Rights Plan effective January 1, 1995. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.7 to the Registrants' Form S-4 Registration Statement—Securities and Exchange Commission File No. 333-11811)333-11811.)



103



10.7*

 

Eldorado Hotel Casino Deferred Compensation Plan effective January 1, 1990. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.8 to the Registrants' Form S-4 Registration Statement—Securities and Exchange Commission File No. 333-11811)333-11811.)

10.8*

 

Eldorado Hotel Casino Deferred Compensation Plan Trust Agreement dated December 1, 1990 by and between Eldorado Hotel Associates Limited Partnership and Donald L. Carano. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.9 to the Registrants' Form S-4 Registration Statement—Securities and Exchange Commission File No. 333-11811)333-11811.)

10.9.1

 

Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated November 24, 1997, by and among Circus and Eldorado Joint Venture, the Banks named therein and Bank of America National Trust and Savings Association as Administrative Agent, and the related Note, Amended and Restated Make-Well Agreement and Amended and Restated Deed of Trust. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4 (h) to the quarterly report for the quarterly period ended October 31, 1997 of Circus Circus Enterprises, Inc. (Mandalay Resort Group) (Commission File No. 1-8570)

10.9.2

 

Second Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated as of March 5, 2002, among Circus and Eldorado Joint Venture, the banks referred to therein and Bank of America, N.A., as administrative agent. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.9.2 to the Registrants' Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2001)

10.9.3

 

Guaranty dated as of March 5, 2002, made by Silver Legacy Capital Corp., in favor of Bank of America, N.A., as administrative agent. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.9.3 to the Registrants' Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2001)

106



10.9.4

 

Second Amended and Restated Security Agreement, dated as of March 5, 2002, by and between Circus and Eldorado Joint Venture and Bank of America, N.A., as administrative agent. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.9.4 to the Registrants' Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2001)

10.9.5

 

Guarantor Security Agreement, dated as of March 5, 2002, by and between Silver Legacy Capital Corp. and Bank of America, N.A., as administrative agent. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.9.5 to the Registrants' Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2001)

10.9.6

 

Second Amended and Restated Deed of Trust, dated as of February 26, 2002, but effective March 5, 2002, by and among Circus and Eldorado Joint Venture and Bank of America, N.A., as administrative agent. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.9.6 to the Registrants' Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2001)

10.9.7

 

Second Amended and Restated Assignment of Rent and Revenues entered into as of February 26, 2002, but effective as of March 5, 2002, by and between Circus and Eldorado Joint Venture and Bank of America, N.A., as administrative agent. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.9.7 to the Registrants' Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2001)

10.9.8

 

Second Amended and Restated Collateral Account Agreement, dated March 5, 2002, by and between Circus and Eldorado Joint Venture and Bank of America, N.A., as administrative agent. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.9.8 to the Registrants' Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2001)

10.9.9

 

Intercreditor Agreement, dated as of March 5, 2002, by and among Bank of America, N.A., as administrative agent, The Bank of New York, as trustee, Circus and Eldorado Joint Venture and Silver Legacy Capital Corp. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.9.9 to the Registrants' Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2001)

10.10.1

 

Indenture, dated as of March 5, 2002, among Circus and Eldorado Joint Venture, Silver Legacy Capital Corp., and The Bank of New York, as trustee. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.10.1 to the Registrants' Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2001)



104



10.10.2

 

Deed of Trust, dated as of February 26, 2002, by Circus and Eldorado Joint Venture, to First American Title Company of Nevada for the benefit of the Bank of New York. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.10.2 to the Registrants' Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2001)

10.10.3

 

Security Agreement, dated as of March 5, 2002, by and between Circus and Eldorado Joint Venture and Silver Legacy Corp. for the benefit of The Bank of New York, as trustee. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.10.3 to the Registrants' Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2001)

10.10.4

 

Assignment of Rent and Revenues entered into as of February 26, 2002, by and between Circus and Eldorado Joint Venture and The Bank of New York, as trustee. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.10.4 to the Registrants' Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2001)

10.10.5

 

Collateral Account Agreement, dated as of March 5, 2002, by and among Circus and Eldorado Joint Venture, Silver Legacy Capital Corp., and The Bank of New York, as trustee. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.10.5 to the Registrants' Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2001)

10.10.6

 

Environmental Indemnity Agreement entered into as of March 5, 2002, by Circus and Eldorado Joint Venture and Silver Legacy Capital Corp. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.10.6 to the Registrants' Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2001)

107



10.11

 

Operating Agreement of Tamarack Crossings LLC dated as of December 13, 2000 by and among Eldorado Resorts LLC, The Robert and Nana Sullivan Family Trust, Robert E. Armstrong, Donald L. Carano and Patrick C. Sullivan. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.12 to the Registrants' Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2000)

10.12

 

Operating Agreement of MindPlay LLC dated as of July 1, 2000 by and among Eldorado Resorts LLC, Avereon Research LTD. and others, and Amendment thereto. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.13 to the Registrants' Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2000)

10.13

 

Articles of Merger dated May 31, 2001 by and between Tamarack Partners, LLC and Tamarack Crossings, LLC. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.14 to the Registrants' Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2001)

10.14

 

Unit Option Agreement dated June 29, 2001 by and among The Robert and Nana Sullivan Family Trust and Eldorado Resorts LLC. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.15 to the Registrants' Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2001)

10.15

 

First Amendment to Operating Agreement of Tamarack Crossings, LLC dated as of June 29, 2001 by and among Eldorado Resorts LLC, The Robert and Nana Sullivan Family Trust, Robert G. Armstrong, Donald L. Carano and Patrick C. Sullivan. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.16 to the Registrants' Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2001)

16

 

Letter from Arthur Andersen LLP. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 16 to the Registrant's Form 8-K dated May 24, 2002)

21

 

List of Subsidiaries.

99.131.1

 

Certification of Donald L. Carano, Chief Executive Officer of Resorts and Capital

99.231.2

 

Certification of Robert M. Jones, Chief Financial Officer of Resorts

99.331.3

 

Certification of Gene R. Carano, Chief Financial Officer of Capital

32.1


Certification of Donald L. Carano pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350

32.2


Certification of Robert M. Jones pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350

32.3


Certification of Gene R. Carano pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350

*
Constitutes a management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement.


QuickLinks

FORM 10-K
PART I
PART II
SELECTED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL DATA (dollars in thousands)
Footnotes to Selected Consolidated Financial Data
PART III
Item 10. DirectorsBoard Members and Executive Officers of the Registrants.
PART IV
Item 14. Controls and Procedures.
SIGNATURES
INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF ELDORADO RESORTS LLC
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS
ELDORADO RESORTS LLC CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS (dollars in thousands)
ELDORADO RESORTS LLC CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (dollars in thousands)
ELDORADO RESORTS LLC CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF MEMBERS' EQUITY (dollars in thousands)
ELDORADO RESORTS LLC CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (dollars in thousands)
ELDORADO RESORTS LLC NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
CIRCUS AND ELDORADO JOINT VENTURE (doing business as Silver Legacy Resort Casino) INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS
CIRCUS AND ELDORADO JOINT VENTURE (doing business as Silver Legacy Resort Casino)
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS As of December 31, 20022003 and 20012002 (In thousands)
CIRCUS AND ELDORADO JOINT VENTURE (doing business as Silver Legacy Resort Casino)
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME For the Years Ended December 31, 2003, 2002 2001 and 20002001 (In thousands)
CIRCUS AND ELDORADO JOINT VENTURE (doing business as Silver Legacy Resort Casino) CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF PARTNERS' EQUITY For the Years Ended December 31, 2003, 2002 2001 and 20002001 (In thousands)
CIRCUS AND ELDORADO JOINT VENTURE (doing business as Silver Legacy Resort Casino) CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS For the Years Ended December 31, 2003, 2002 2001 and 20002001 (In thousands)
CIRCUS AND ELDORADO JOINT VENTURE (doing business as Silver Legacy Resort Casino) NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
EXHIBITS INDEX