QuickLinks-- Click here to rapidly navigate through this document

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549


FORM 10-K

(Mark One)

ýxANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 20022004

OR

o¨TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from                        to                        

Commission File Number 000-30975


TRANSGENOMIC, INC.

(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)

Delaware 91-1789357

(State or Other Jurisdiction of

Incorporation or Organization)

 

(IRS Employer

Identification Number)

12325 Emmet Street

Omaha, NE 68164

 68164
(Address of Principal Executive Offices) (Zip Code)

(402) 452-5400

(Registrant'sRegistrant’s Telephone Number, Including Area Code)

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

Title of Each Class


Name of Each Exchange On Which Registered


None N/A

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:

Common Stock, par value $.01 per share

(Title of Class)


 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    Yes /x/x    No / /¨

 

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant'sregistrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K / /Form10-K    x

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act).    Yes / /¨    No /x/x

 

The aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common equity held by non-affiliates of the registrant based on the last reported closing price per share of Common Stock as reported on The Nasdaq National Market on the last business day of the registrant'sregistrant’s most recently completed second fiscal quarter was approximately $34,400,000.$38.37 million.

 

As of March 24, 2003,April 14, 2005, the registrant had 23,532,04934,234,922 shares of Common Stock outstanding that consist of 24,026,653 shares issued less 494,604 shares of treasury stock.outstanding.

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

 

Portions of the 2002 Proxy Statement relating to the Registrant'sRegistrant’s May 21, 200325, 2005 Annual Stockholders Meeting are incorporated by reference into Part III.




TRANSGENOMIC, INC.


TRANSGENOMIC, INC.
Index to Form 10-K for the Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2002
2004

PART I

  

Item 1.

Business1

Item 2.

Properties8

Item 3.

Legal Proceedings9

Item 4.

Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders9

Item 4A.

Executive Officers9

PART II

      
 

Item 1.5.

  Business3
Item 2.PropertiesMarket for Registrant’s Common Equity and Related Stockholder Matters  10
 

Item 3.6.

  Legal ProceedingsSelected Financial Data  1110
 

Item 4.7.

  Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders11
Item 4a.Executive Officers11

PART II





Item 5.Market for Registrant's Common Equity and Related Shareholder Matters13
Item 6.Selected Financial Data13
Item 7.Management'sManagement’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations  1411
 

Item 7A.

  Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk  2319
 

Item 8.

  Financial Statements and Supplementary Data  20
    Independent Auditors'Auditors’ Report  2420
    Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 20022004 and 20012003  2521
    Consolidated Statements of Operations for the Years Ended December 31, 2002, 20012004, 2003 and 20002002  2622
    Consolidated Statements of Stockholders'Stockholders’ Equity (Deficit) for the Years Ended December 31, 2002, 20012004, 2003 and 20002002  2723
    Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Years Ended December 31, 2002, 20012004, 2003 and 20002002  2824
    Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements for the Years Ended December 31, 2002, 20012004, 2003 and 20002002  2925
 

Item 9.

  Changes in and Disagreement with Accountants on Accounting And Financial Disclosure  47

PART III





39
 

Item 10.9A.

  Controls and Procedures39

Item 9B.

Other Information39

PART III

Item 10.

Directors and Executive Officers of the Registrant  4739
 

Item 11.

  Executive Compensation  4739
 

Item 12.

  Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters  4739
 

Item 13.

  Certain Relationships and Related Transactions  4739
 

Item 14.

  ControlsPrincipal Accountant Fees and ProceduresServices  4739

PART IV


  

 

  


 
 

Item 15.

  Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules and Reports of Form 8-K  4739

SIGNATURES

SIGNATURES


50
43

 

This annual report on Form 10-K references the following registered trademarks which are the property of Transgenomic: DNASEP® Columns, WAVE® System, WAVEMAKER® Software, TRANSFORMING THE WORLD® for Laboratory Equipment, TRANSGENOMIC® and the Globe Logo®; MutationDiscovery.com® Website, OLIGOSEP® for Systems and Reagents, OPTIMASE® Polymerase, RNASEP® Columns, WAVE OPTIMIZED® reagents, and WAVE® MD Systems. Additionally, this Annual report on Form 10-K references the following trademarks which are the property of Transgenomic: DNASEP®, GUARD-DISC®, WAVE®, WAVEMAKER®, TRANSFORMING THE WORLD®, TRANSGENOMIC®, TRANSGENOMIC and DESIGN® and TRANSGENOMIC GLOBE LOGO®; OLIGOSEP™, OPTIMASE™, RNASEP™, WAVE OPTIMIZED™, WAVE-MD™, WAVE NAVIGATOR™,MitoScreen Kits, ProtocolWriter Software, Navigator Software, THE POWER OF DISCOVERY™,DISCOVERY for Lab Reagents and MutuationDiscovery.com™.Educational Programs, and Surveyor Nuclease. All other trademarks or trade names referred to in this Annual Report on Form 10-K are the property of their respective owners.

2





PART I


FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

 We have made forward-looking statements in this


PART I

FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

This annual report on Form 10-K that are subject to risks and uncertainties.contains or incorporates by reference certain forward-looking statements. Many of these forward-looking statements refer to our plans, objectives, expectations and intentions, as well as our future financial results.results and are subject to risk and uncertainty. You can identify these forward-looking statements by forward-looking words such as "expects," "anticipates," "intends," "plans," "may," "will," "believes," "seeks," "estimates"“expects,” “anticipates,” “intends,” “plans,” “may,” “will,” “believes,” “seeks,” “estimates” and similar expressions. Because these forward-looking statements involve risks and uncertainties, there are importantmany factors that could cause our actual results to differ materially from those expressed or implied by these forward-looking statements, including our plans, objectives, expectations and intentions and other factorsthose discussed under "Risks“Risks Related to Our Business"Business” and other factors identified by cautionary language used elsewhere in thisthe annual report on Form 10-K.

Item 1.    Business.

Item 1.Business

Overview

We provide innovative products and services for the synthesis, purification and analysis of nucleic acids. Our operations fall into two principal business units, BioSystems and Nucleic Acids. Our BioSystems products include our WAVE® automated instrument systems, WAVE associated consumables,consumable products and other related consumable products. Our Nucleic Acids products consist principally of chemical building blocks for nucleic acid synthesis and synthesized nucleic acids. Oursynthesis. Both business units have service offerings includeas well, including genetic variation discovery services, novel chemistry developmentand analysis services and custom synthesis of specialty nucleic acids.

Our business strategytechnologies center around three core competencies: separation chemistries, enzymology, and nucleic acid chemistries. We employ novel chemistries for separating nucleic acids, proteins, peptides, amino acids and carbohydrates. Our most significant separation technology is currently embodied in the WAVE System. The WAVE System is a versatile instrument that can be used for genetic variation detection, size-based double-strand DNA separation and analysis, single-strand DNA separation and analysis and DNA purification. The WAVE System requires the use of various consumable products that we manufacture and sell separately.

Our second core competency is expertise in developing novel enzymes. Enzymes are proteins that act as catalysts for biochemical reactions. Several of these reactions are useful in genomics. The ability to aligndevelop enzymes useful in the experimental manipulation of genes provides powerful tools for producing genetic material in the form needed for further analysis or incorporation into diagnostics and therapeutics. These products can also expand the sale of consumable products to WAVE System users and may also be sold for other applications. Our SURVEYOR® product line of mutation detection kits allow for the cleaving of DNA at points where DNA sequence variations exists. The resulting DNA fragments can then be analyzed by our productWAVE System, fluorescent capillary electrophoresis or standard gel electrophoresis. SURVEYOR Kits provide a simple and service offeringsrobust method of scanning relatively large DNA fragments for both known and novel sequence variations.

Our third core competency is nucleic acid chemistries. Our synthetic nucleic acid products consist of chemical building blocks of nucleic acids (known as phosphoramidites). We also manufacture related specialty chemicals such as fluorescent markers and molecular tags, dyes, quenchers, linkers, and solvents used to modify nucleic acids for subsequent detection or manipulation. These products are used by research organizations, diagnostic companies and pharmaceutical companies. These products are produced primarily in our Glasgow, Scotland facility. Prior to November 11, 2004, we had also manufactured synthesized segments of nucleic acids (known as oligonucleotides) in a facility in Boulder, Colorado. On November 11, 2004, we sold the assets associated with this facility to a subsidiary of Eyetech Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (“Eyetech”). As a result of this sale, we no longer manufacture and sell these specialized oligonucleotides.

Our operations are managed based upon the evolutionnature of genetic advancements and to become a major supplier ofthe products and services provided. Accordingly, we operate in two reportable segments, BioSystems and Nucleic Acids. Operations for these segments are evaluated based upon specific identification of revenues and expenses associated with the business activities resulting in a segment operating income or loss. See Note K to the accompanying consolidated financial statements for detailed segment information.

Business Strategy

Since inception, our business strategy has been to provide products and services to biomedical researchers, medical institutions, diagnostic and pharmaceutical companies. Specifically,companies that are tied to advancements in the field of genetics. The movement in the field of genomics, and related market opportunities, has shifted from gene discovery to the analysis of variations in gene sequences. Researchers are beginning to link variations in the gene sequences to disorders and diseases. Accordingly, a principal component of our strategy ishas been to

        Our technologies center around three core competencies: separation chemistries, enzymology, and nucleic acid chemistries.

        Our separation chemistries competency consists While we continue to believe that the long-term prospects for this business segment are favorable, we concluded that near-term revenues from this segment would generate neither positive cash flows nor profits from operations. Consequently, in the second quarter of expertise in developing novel chemical compounds tailored2004, our Board of Directors directed management to interact with samplesexplore strategic alternatives for our Nucleic Acids operating segment, including the possible sale of interest. Specifically, this interaction involves bindingone or both of the total sample tofacilities in Glasgow, Scotland and Boulder, Colorado. On November 11, 2004, we sold the compound followed by a selective release of individual components of the sample. This release is induced by the introduction of other factors, such as chemical reagents, temperature changes, and pressure changes. The separation compound is coated on the surface of microscopic polymer beads and packed in a column. The interaction and separation occurs within the tube as the sample is pumped through it. We currently have novel chemistries for separating nucleic acids, proteins, peptides, amino acids and carbohydrates.

        One of our significant separation technologies is currently embodied in the WAVE System. The WAVE System is a versatile instrument that can be used for variation detection, size-based double-strand DNA separation and analysis, single-strand DNA separation and analysis and DNA purification. Because of this versatility, the WAVE System can essentially replace the use of traditional gel electrophoresis in the molecular biology laboratory. Our patented technology uses a process known as high performance liquid chromatography to separate DNA material so that genetic variation may be identified and analyzed. In this process, DNA is injected into a special tube or column containing microscopic polymer beads. These

3



micro-beads have special surface chemistries that cause the DNA molecules to attach to the surface of the beads. A chemical reagent is then pumped through the column under carefully controlled pressure and temperature conditions causing the DNA molecules to be selectively released from the beads so that they can be separated and measured. Our proprietary software controls the entire process and produces the results of the operation in an easy-to-read chart format. Once the DNA sample is loaded into the instrument and necessary data is entered into the software, the process requires virtually no additional input from the researcher. By using our patented DNASep®, OLIGOSep® and RNASep® columns and specifically formulated reagents that we have developed for various applications, the researcher is able to achieve a consistent high-quality result. Our WAVE system may be designed in the future to meet the needs of the emerging molecular diagnostics market.

        Additionally, the WAVE System requires the use of various consumable products that we manufacture and sell separately. As more WAVE Systems are sold, we expect that these consumable products will become an increasingly significant source of revenue for us. The principal consumable products used with the WAVE System are the DNASep, OLIGOSep and RNASep columns and the chemical reagents that are used to carry the DNA samples through the WAVE System. Other consumables include filters and other replacement parts of the WAVE System.

        Our second core competency is expertise in developing novel enzymes. Enzymes are proteins that act as catalysts for biochemical reactions. One such reaction useful in genomics is the cleavage of DNA into defined fragments at specific points, accomplished by the use of restriction enzymes. Another example is the formation of DNA or RNA from precursor substances in the presence of pre-existing DNA or RNA acting as a template. Enzymes that catalyze this reaction are called polymerases. The ability to develop enzymes useful in the experimental manipulation of genes provides powerful tools for producing genetic material in the form needed for further analysis or incorporation into diagnostics and therapeutics. One of our current enzymology offerings is called Optimase. Optimase polymerase is a novel enzyme unique to Transgenomic that was developed specifically to meet the needs of customers with post polymerase chain reaction (PCR) applications such as the WAVE system. Although this product may be used for any PCR application it was specifically developed to be used with a WAVE system. Optimase, used in conjunctionassets associated with our WAVE optimized consumables, provides superior testing results and extends the life of our DNASep, OligoSep or RNASep columns. This product is expected to further expand our sales of consumable products to WAVE system users and may also be sold for other PCR applications.

        Our third core competency, nucleic acid chemistries, stems in part from our 2001 acquisition of Annovis, Inc. Our Synthetic Nucleic Acid products consist of chemical building blocks ("phosphoramidites"), fluorescent markers and dyes, associated reagents, oligonucleotides and oligomimetics. These products are currently being sold to research organizations, diagnostic companies and pharmaceutical companies. The majority of our synthetic nucleic acid revenues are currently generated through the sale of phosphoramidite products that are produced in our Glasgow, Scotland facility. We are in the process of completing a new production facility in Boulder, Colorado that will be able to further process phosphoramidite products into synthesized oligonucleotides in large quantities. This facility will also provide process development, enhancement and unique chemistry development services. We expect demand for phosphoramidites and synthesized oligonucleotides to increase over the next several years as biopharmaceutical and pharmaceutical companies in the early stages of their efforts to develop genomic-based diagnostics and therapeutics experience product successes. Finally, our nucleic acid chemistry capabilities also include expertise in the ability to produce related specialty chemicals, such as molecular tags, dyes, quenchers, linkers, and solvents used to modify nucleic acids for subsequent detection, or manipulation.

4


        The Company's internet address iswww.transgenomic.com. The Company makes available free of charge through its website its annual report on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K and amendments to those reports filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act as soon as reasonably practicable after such documents are electronically filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Industry Background

Genomics-Based Research, Diagnostics and Therapeutics

        The human body is composed of billions of cells each containing deoxyribonucleic acid, or DNA, which encodes the basic instructions for cellular function. The complete set of DNA is called the genome, or genetic code. The human genome is composed of 23 pairs of chromosomes that are further divided into approximately 30,000, or more, smaller regions called genes. Genes are used in the cell as the template for the production of proteins, and it is these proteins that direct cell function that are ultimately reflected in the individual traits of the person. Any variation in the DNA sequence of a particular gene may result in a change in the cell function controlled by that gene. These changes, known as genetic variations, are often the cause of disease or make an individual more susceptible to disease.

        Genomics is the systematic and comprehensive analysis of the sequence, structure and function of the genes that comprise the genome, the objective of which is identifying and understanding the role of genes in human physiology and disease. This information will only be developed through the intense study of genetic variation. Accordingly, genomics researchers are now attempting to understand variations in this DNA sequence information and how it correlates to disease in order to develop new therapeutics and diagnostic tools.

Synthetic Nucleic Acids

        Synthetic nucleic acid molecules—commonly referred to as oligonucleotides—are necessary consumable reagents for numerous DNA-based analytical methods, diagnostic methods, and therapeutic products.

Genomics-based Diagnostics

        Once a relationship is established between a particular genetic variation(s) and a disease it becomes possible to look for the specific genetic variation(s) or other biomarkers as a way of diagnosing a person's susceptibility to the disease or the actual presence of the disease.

Genomics-based Therapeutics

Target Identification—It has been estimated that the human genome sequence could provide 5,000-10,000 new potential target molecules on which to base drug discovery efforts, representing a 10 to 20-fold increase over the approximately 500 targets identified during the entire history of drug development to date.

Target Validation—Target validation is the process of establishing proof that a particular drug target is involved in a disease or biological process of interest and, furthermore, that experimental modulation of the target (which would ultimately be accomplished by a drug) has an impact on that process.

Clinical Trials—After a lead drug candidate has been identified, and its safety and efficacy has been demonstrated in animal models, testing must be performed on human subjects. Genetic variation among patients can impact drug efficacy as well as the likelihood of adverse drug reactions. It has been suggested that study of these effects should be incorporated into the clinical trial process. The relatively new segment of genomics called pharmacogenetics studies the impact genetic variation has on the safety and efficacy of drugs.

5



Business Strategy

        Our business strategy is to align our product and service offerings with the evolution of genetic advancements and to become a major supplier of products and services to researchers, medical institutions, diagnostic and pharmaceutical companies. Genetic advancements have been and continue to develop over time. The movement along the genomics continuum and related market opportunities has shifted from gene discovery to analysis of variations in gene sequences. From these variations researchers are beginning to link the impacts to associated disorders and diseases that further lead to the creation of diagnostic tests and appropriate therapeutic treatments and drugs.

        Key elements of our strategy are as follows:

2004.

 In support of our business strategy the following key milestones were achieved during 2002:

6


Researchanticipated revenues. The plan (which is incremental to the sale of our Boulder, Colorado facility) included a workforce reduction of approximately 60 positions and Development

        We maintain an active programthe closure of two domestic research and development facilities associated with our Nucleic Acids operating segment and expecttwo European field offices. Additionally, we eliminated approximately 10 positions at our chemical building blocks manufacturing facility in Glasgow, Scotland. In conjunction with these changes, we incurred a charge of $3.57 million during the quarter ended December 31, 2004 related primarily to continue to spend significant amounts on researchseverance, benefits and development in 2003. Our research and development activities includefacility closures.

Together, the improvementsale of the DNA separation media used in our columns, the refinement of the hardware and software components of the WAVE System, the creation of unique enzymes and WAVE optimized enzymes for PCRspecialty oligonucleotide manufacturing facility and the improvement of chemical and biochemical reaction techniques for synthetic nucleic acids. We consult with several leading scientists from around the world as partimplementation of our ongoing researchrestructuring plan are expected to result in $10.00 million to $12.00 million in annual cost savings.

We revised our credit facilities with Laurus Master Funds, Ltd.

We have entered into a $7.50 million convertible line of credit (the ”Credit Line”) and development efforts. These advisors assist us in formulating our research, development, and commercialization strategies.

        Our WAVE system related research and development work is focuseda separate $2.75 million convertible note (the ”Term Note”) with Laurus Master Fund, Ltd. (“Laurus”)(collectively, the “Laurus Loans”). In February 2004, Laurus waived the borrowing base limitation on developing additional functionality in the WAVE System that will enable us to expand the number of applicationsCredit Line, thereby making the systemfull $7.50 million facility available to the Company regardless of the available collateral. On August 31, 2004, Laurus agreed to extend the borrowing base waiver on the Credit Line through March 19, 2005. In addition, Laurus has deferred certain payments due under the Term Note and reduced the interest rate on both of the Laurus Loans to 0% for any day the closing sale price of the Company’s common stock is at or above $1.75 per share. In return, we lowered the conversion price on each of the Laurus Loans to $1.00 per share and issued a warrant to Laurus covering an essential tool in genetic research. We are also developing improved methodsadditional 400,000

common shares at an exercise price of $1.25 per share. The closing price of the Company’s common stock on August 31, 2004 was $1.20 per share.

Subsequent to December 31, 2004, we further amended our Credit Line. On March 18, 2005, Laurus agreed to extend the borrowing base waiver on the Credit Line through March 31, 2006. In addition, we agreed to allow Laurus to convert $1.87 million of the outstanding principal balance under the Credit Line into 3,600,000 shares of common stock on March 18, 2005 and procedures to enable researchers to use$0.65 million of the WAVE System to screen biological samples for genetic markers known to be disease related. We are working to makeoutstanding principal balance of the screening process fasterTerm Note into 1,250,000 shares of common stock on March 24, 2005. As a result, we have increased the amount available under the Credit Line by $1.87 million and more automated throughhave eliminated substantially all remaining 2005 scheduled principal payments on the development of new software and improved separation media and instrumentation.Term Loan.

 Our Synthetic Nucleic Acid related research is focused on process and chemistry improvements in order to achieve greater quality and yields in the manufacture of chemical building blocks and the synthesis of oligonucleotides. We are also involved in the development of new synthetic nucleic acid chemistries for various applications in research, diagnostic and therapeutic markets.

Sales and Marketing

 

We currently sell our products to customers in major markets, specificallyover 30 countries. We use a direct sales and support staff for sales in the U.S., the U.K. and most countries in Western Europe, with a direct sales and support staff.Europe. For the rest of the world, we sell our products through dealers and distributors located in those local markets. As of December 31, 2002, we hadWe currently have over 25 dealers and distributors. We also maintain regionally-based technical support staffs and applications scientists to support our sales and marketing activities throughout the U.S., Europe and Japan. See Note L, "Operating Segment and Geographical Information," to our consolidated financial statements for a summary of our net sales by geographic area and product group.Europe.

 Our marketing efforts utilize a variety of promotional channels including print advertisements, scientific conferences, trade shows and Internet browser ads. The primary targets of our marketing efforts are life sciences researchers and medical geneticists in academic and commercial research institutions, biopharma and pharmaceutical companies.

Customers

 We have sold our products to several hundred customers in over 30 countries.

Customers include numerous leading academic and medical institutions in the U.S. and abroad. In addition, our customers

7



also include a number of large, established U.S. and foreign pharmaceutical, biotech and commercial companies.

 

During 2004, sales to Geron Corporation totaled $4.15 million and represented 12% of total consolidated net sales and 49% of total net sales within our Nucleic Acids operating segment. We do not have a long-term sales agreement with Geron Corporation and, accordingly, the amount of nucleic acid products we sell to it is subject to change. Revenues from our Nucleic Acids business would be substantially reduced if Geron Corporation’s need for our products declined or if it decided to obtain these products from other suppliers.

No singleother customer accountedcurrently accounts for more than 10% of total consolidated or operating segment net sales.

Research and Development

We maintain an active program of research and development and expect to continue to incur significant expense for these activities going forward. Our research and development activities include the improvement of the DNA separation media used in our salesWAVE System, the refinement of the hardware and software components of the WAVE System, the creation of unique enzymes and WAVE-Optimized® enzymes, and, to a lesser extent, the improvement of chemical and biochemical reaction techniques for synthetic nucleic acids.

Consistent with our business strategy discussed above, we have taken steps to reduce research and development expenditures to levels that are more consistent with our current levels of revenue. For 2004, our research and development expenditures were approximately $6.69 million. This represents a substantial reduction from our prior levels of expenditures that were $9.31 million, $12.20 million and $9.37 million in 2002. During2003, 2002 and 2001, one customer, Applied Biosystems, accounted for approximately 14% ofrespectively. We expect that we will further curtail our total revenues. Salesresearch and development activities until we are able to Applied Biosystems included WAVE systems, WAVE optimized consumable productsincrease our revenues or otherwise improve our liquidity and Synthetic Nucleic Acid products. No single customer accounted for more than 10% of our sales in 2000.working capital positions.

Manufacturing

 

We manufacture bioconsumable products including our separation columns, liquid reagents, polymeraseenzymes and nucleic acid products. The major components of our WAVE systems are manufactured for us by a third party. We integrate our own hardware and software with these third party manufactured components. Our manufacturing facilities for our WAVE® systems and bioconsumables are located in Omaha, Nebraska, San Jose, California, and Cramlington, England.

Our Synthetic Nucleic Acidphosphoramidites and related synthetic nucleic acid products are manufactured in our Glasgow, Scotland and Boulder, Colorado. In 2002 we began a project to upgrade and expand our production capabilities in Glasgow. This project included the upgrading of equipment and processes at the current production facility and the purchase of a new facility that will permit significant capacity expansion, equipment upgrades and process improvements in the future. Also in 2002, we leased a production facility in Boulder, Colorado. This facility is currently being developed and qualified as a cGMP (Good Manufacturing Practices) facility mainly for the synthesis of oligonucleotides. Such qualification is required for facilities that will produce Active Pharmaceutical Ingredients (API's). The Boulder facility began non-GMP production operations in the first quarter of 2003 and is expected to begin cGMP production in the second quarter of 2003.

Backlogfacility.

 We manufacture our consumable products and assemble our system units based upon forecasts of near-term demand and receipts of firm orders from customers. Systems are configured to customer specifications and are generally shipped shortly after receipt of the order. Customers may reschedule orders with little or no penalty. For these reasons, our systems backlog at any given time is not particularly meaningful because it is not necessarily indicative of future sales levels. We had order backlogs at December 31, 2002, totaling approximately $3.0 million. In addition to our order backlog, we have deferred revenue recorded on our balance sheet totaling approximately $1.2 million. This amount is made up mainly of deferred revenue associated with service contracts on our WAVE instruments that cover a certain period of time. Such deferred revenue is recognized over the service contract period.

Intellectual Property

 

To establish and protect our proprietary technologies and products, we rely on a combination of patent, copyright, trademark and trade-secret laws, as well as confidentiality provisions in our contracts. We have successfully prosecuted or licensed in numerous patents protecting our core technologies, and as a result we presently own rights to more than 80 issued patents and over 6050 pending applications in both the USU.S. and abroad. Our BioSystems operating segment products, comprising the WAVE® System and related consumables, are protected by patents and in-licensed technologies with remaining lives of 9 to 18 years. Intellectual property related to our Synthetic Nucleic Acid business unit, other than production trade secrets, is almost entirely

in-licensed. A number of these in-licensed patents have recently, or will soon, expire. As a result, we expect price competition in the Nucleic Acids operating segment to intensify in the next year. We will continue to file patent applications and seek new licenses as wewarranted to protect and develop new products and technologies. We presently have no indication thattechnologies of interest to our products infringe on the intellectual property rights of others, but it is possible we may be required to defend ourselves against such claims, whether or not these have merit. We also protect our trade secrets by entering into confidentiality agreements with third parties and require employees and consultants also sign confidentiality agreements, including assignment of patents and copyrights madecustomer base in the course of employment. Despite such efforts it is possible that we will have to sue to enforce these agreements and the outcome of any such lawsuit is uncertain.coming years.

8



Competition

 Competitors

The markets in which our Biosystems operating segment operates are highly competitive, and characterized by rapidly changing technological advances. A number of Transgenomic’s competitors possess substantial resources and are able to develop and offer a much greater breadth of products and/or services, coupled with significant marketing and distribution capabilities. Transgenomic competes principally on the basis of uniquely enabling technical advantages in specific but significant market segments.

Competition for our Biosystems segmentWAVE Systems arises primarily from DNA sequencing and genotyping technologies. Competitors in these areas include several companies including Varian, Waters, Agilent, Applied Biosystems, Beckman Coulter, Amersham Biosciences(now part of GE Healthcare), Affymetrix, Agilent Technologies, Nanogen, Illumina, Sequenom, Pyrosequencing (now part of Biotage AB), Varian, and Invitrogen. Theseothers. Competition for some of our non-WAVE consumable products comes from numerous well-diversified life sciences reagents providers, including, among others, Invitrogen, Qiagen, Roche, Stratagene, and Promega. Our Discovery Services unit faces competition from a number of companies provide various productsoffering contract DNA sequencing and other genomic analysis services, that compete either directly withincluding Genaissance Pharmaceuticals, GeneLogic, Agencourt, SeqWright, Gentris, and Perlagen. In addition, several clinical diagnostics service providers, such as Labcorp, Quest, and Specialty Laboratories, also offer related laboratory services in support of clinical trials. Finally, additional competition arises from academic core laboratory facilities.

Competition is also intense in the markets in which our systems, bioconsumablesNucleic Acids operating segment functions, and services, or indirectly through alternative technologies and/or methods. Competitors for ourincreasingly driven by price. Transgenomic competes on the basis of its ability to develop and manufacture synthetic nucleic acid segment vary depending on the product. In the standard chemical building blocks market, we compete with Applied Biosystems,used to make DNA and RNA oligonucleotides. Competitors include Proligo andDegussa, Pierce Nucleic Acid Technologies. The competitors for our pharmaceutical grade oligonucleotide synthesis productsTechnologies, and services include primarily Proligo and Avecia.Applied Byosystems. In addition, competition is expected in the future from new overseas entrants focusing on low cost production.

Employees

 

As of December 31, 2002,2004 and 2003, we had 326 full-time employees. The following sets forth178 and 244 employees, respectively. Certain of those employees at December 31, 2004 were terminated during January and February 2005 in connection with the number2004 restructuring plan. As of persons employedFebruary 28, 2005, we had 157 employees and expect our headcount to be relatively stable throughout the remainder of 2005. These employees are focused in the principalfollowing areas of our operation:

Manufacturing108
Sales, Marketing and Administration158
Research and Development60

 

   February 28,
2005


  December 31,
2004


  December 31,
2003


BioSysytems Operating Segment

         

Manufacturing

  50  52  54

Sales, Marketing and Administration

  68  75  90

Research and Development

  18  19  31
   
  
  
   136  146  175

Nucleic Acids Operating Segment

         

Manufacturing

  16  20  45

Sales, Marketing and Administration

  5  6  8

Research and Development

  0  6  16
   
  
  
   21  32  69
   
  
  
   157  178  244
   
  
  

We supplement our workforce through the use of independent contractors and consultants. As of February 28, 2005 and December 31, 2002,2004, we have engaged independent contractors or consultants who provide services to us approximately equivalent to 5 full time employees.five and four full-time employees, respectively.

 The Company began a restructuring process during the fourth quarter of 2002 that resulted

Our employees were employed in the eliminationfollowing geographical locations.

   February 28,
2005


  December 31,
2004


  December 31,
2003


United States

  93  106  166

Europe (other than the United Kingdom)

  20  22  20

United Kingdom

  44  50  58
   
  
  
   157  178  244
   
  
  

General Information

We were incorporated in Delaware on March 6, 1997. Our principal office is located at 12325 Emmet Street, Omaha, Nebraska 68164 (telephone: 402-452-5400). We maintain manufacturing facilities in Omaha, Nebraska, San Jose, California, Glasgow, Scotland and Cramlington, England. We maintain research and development offices in Gaithersburg, Maryland and Omaha, Nebraska.

Our Internet address iswww.transgenomic.com. We make our annual report on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K and amendments to those reports available free of a significant number of job positions. A large number of employees that had been notified of termination had not yet reached their termination datecharge through our website as soon as reasonably practicable after we file these documents with the Securities and thus are included in the 12/31/02 employee counts shown above. Additionally, further job eliminations were to occur during the first quarter of 2003. The total employee count following these further reductions is expected to be approximately 270 to 280.Exchange Commission.

Risks Related to Our Business

We may not have adequate financial resources available to execute our business plan.plan and may be need to terminate some operations.

 

As of March 31, 2005, we had cash and cash equivalents of $1.37 million plus an additional $2.29 million available under our Credit Line. Despite our efforts to reduce costs and to obtain additional debt and equity financing, our liquidity and working capital positions continue at levels that may not be adequate to meet our needs for cash in the future. Our liquidity and working capital position is largely due to the operating losses that we have incurred, particularly in our Nucleic Acids operating segment, and to increased accounts receivable (largely from international sales), short-term investments, inventory, and to a lesser extent, purchases of property and equipment. We expect to continue to need substantial amounts of cash to fund our operations and capital expenditures and our existing cash balances, cash generated by operations, and our remaining borrowing capacity under our existing Credit Line may be insufficient to satisfy our liquidity requirements. In order to meet our cash needs for the remainder of 2005, it is essential that we achieve revenue growth in our BioSystems operating segment and manage costs according to our operating plan. There is no assurance that we will be able to achieve all of these steps or that any of these steps will allow us to meet our cash needs. Accordingly, our existing cash balances, cash generated by operations, and available borrowings under the Credit Line may be insufficient to satisfy our liquidity requirements. In addition, there is no assurance that we will be able to obtain additional debt or equity financing to meet future cash needs. If we are not able to meet our needs for working capital, we may not be able to execute parts or all of our business plan and may need to discontinue operations in one or both of our operating segments.

We have historicallya history of operating losses and may incur losses in the future.

We have experienced losses from operations since inception of our operations. Our operating losses for each of the last three fiscal years were $29.06 million, $22.59 million and negative cash flows.$21.70 million, respectively. These results were mostlylosses have been due principally to the high levels of research and development expenses and sales and marketing expenses relatedthat we have incurred in order to the developmentdevelop and marketing ofmarket our products. We couldproducts, restructuring charges and impairment charges. In addition, markets for our products have developed more slowly than expected in many cases and may continue to do so. As a result, we may incur operating losses forin the foreseeable future, and we may never be profitable. To date,

We may issue a substantial amount of our stock in conversion of our debt and exercise of options and warrants and this could reduce the market price for our stock.

As of April 14, 2005, we have financed our operations and capital expenditures primarily from the proceeds of a $77.3had outstanding 34,234,922 million public offeringshares of common stock. In March 2003,We also had obligations to issue approximately 6.2 million shares of common stock under outstanding stock options and warrants. Additionally, we entered into a loan commitment agreement with a financial institution for up to a $5.0may issue shares of common stock upon conversion of all or part of the Laurus Loans. Currently, Laurus may acquire 2.8 million secured lineshares of credit. We will continue to need substantial amountsour common stock upon conversion of cash for research and development and to expand our sales and manufacturing infrastructure. We may need to raise the additional capital in the future through bank financing or strategic investments. Additional financing may not be available to us when we need it, or, if available, we cannot assure that we will be able to obtain such financing on terms favorable to our stockholders or us. If we raise additional capital by issuing equity securities, thethis debt. The issuance of such securities would result in ownership dilutionadditional shares of common stock may be dilutive to our stockholders.current shareholders and could negatively impact the market price of our common stock.

WeMarkets for our products and services may not have adequate organizational resources available to execute our business plan.develop slowly.

 During

There are many factors that affect the fourth quarter of 2002market demand for our products and the first quarter of 2003, we restructured the Company, which resulted in a net reduction in staff and facilities, and the abandonment of certain intellectual property. While we feel we have retained and redeployed existing resources and secured additional resources necessary to successfully conduct our business,services that we cannot assure youcontrol. This is especially true in our Nucleic Acids operating segment where the demand for our products depends to a large degree on the success that the net reduction will not impair our abilitycustomers and potential customers have in developing useful pharmaceutical products based on genetic intervention. A central strategy for our Nucleic Acids operating segment is to achieve our planned revenue levels.

9



Our business strategy includes positioning ourselves as a unique partnersell synthetic nucleic acid products to biopharmaceutical and pharmaceutical companies that are seeking to develop commercially viable genomic-based diagnostic and therapeutic products. We have invested a significant amount of capital into acquiring and developing manufacturing facilities and other assets to allow us to pursue this market. However, this is a new field of commercial development, and many of these biopharmaceutical and pharmaceutical companies are in the early stages of their efforts to develop genomic-based diagnostics and therapeutics.therapeutics and have encountered difficulties in these efforts. As a result, the demand for our synthetic nucleic acid products is difficult to forecast and may develop slowly or sporadically. In addition, we cannot

assure you that these companies will not internally develop the chemistries and manufacturing capabilities to produce the products they could buy from us. Demand for our WAVE System is similarly affected by the needs and budgetary resources of research institutions, universities, hospitals and others who use the WAVE System for genetic-variation research. The WAVE System represents a significant expenditure by these types of customers and often requires a long sales cycle. If revenues from the sales of our products and services continue at current levels, we may need to take steps to further reduce operating expenses or raise additional working capital. We cannot assure you that sales will increase or that we will be able to reduce operating expenses or raise additional working capital.

A single customer accounts for a significant portion of consolidated net sales and net sales in our Nucleic Acids operating segment.

During 2004, sales to Geron Corporation totaled $4.15 million and represented 12% of total consolidated net sales and 49% of total net sales within our Nucleic Acids operating segment. We do not have a long-term sales agreement with Geron Corporation and, accordingly, the amount of nucleic acid products we sell to it is subject to change. Revenues from our Nucleic Acids operating segment business would be substantially reduced if Geron Corporation’s need for our products declined or if it decided to obtain these products from other suppliers.

No other customer currently accounts for more than 10% of total consolidated or operating segment net sales.

Customer clinical trials may be delayed or discontinued.

A significant percentage of our Nucleic Acids operating segment and Discovery Services revenues are generated by sales to customers involved in drug development. Our products and services are generally used by these customers in the manufacture of drug candidates in varying stages clinical trials. If these clinical trials are delayed or cancelled or are otherwise not successful, this could have a significant impact on revenues.

The sale of our products and business operations in international markets subjects us to additional risks.

During the last three fiscal years, our international sales have been approximately 55-65% of our net sales. As a result, a major portion of our revenues and expenses are subject to risks associated with international sales and operations. These risks include:

payment cycles in foreign markets are typically longer than in the U.S. and capital spending budgets for research agencies can vary over time with foreign governments;

changes in foreign currency exchange rates can make our products more costly and operating expenses higher in local currencies since our foreign sales and operating expenses are typically paid for in U.S. Dollars, British Pounds or the Euro; and

the potential for changes in U.S. and foreign laws or regulations that result in additional import or export restrictions, higher tariffs or other taxes, more burdensome licensing requirements or similar impediments to our ability to sell products and services profitably in these markets.

Our WAVE System includes hardware components and instrumentation manufactured by a single supplier and if we are no longer able to obtain these components and instrumentation our ability to manufacture our products could be impaired.

We currently rely on a single supplier, Hitachi High Technologies America, to provide the basic instrument used in our WAVE Systems. While other suppliers of instrumentation and computer hardware are available, we believe that our arrangement with Hitachi offers strategic advantages. Hitachi is replacing its current instrument line with a new instrument line. While we presently plan to convert our technology and applications to this new instrument line, such conversion may not be successful and, therefore, we may incur additional costs for the custom manufacturing of the current instrument line. If we were required to seek alternative sources of supply, it could be time consuming or expensive or require significant and costly modification of our WAVE System. Also, if we were unable to obtain instruments from Hitachi in sufficient quantities or in a timely manner, our ability to manufacture our products could be impaired, which could limit our future revenues.

We may not have adequate personnel to execute our business plan.

In order to reduce our operating costs, we have significantly reduced the number of employees, including reductions in our research and development staff and our sales and marketing personnel. In addition, we may lose other key management, scientific, technical, sales and manufacturing personnel from time to time. It may be very difficult to replace personnel if they are needed in the future, and the loss of key personnel could harm our business and operating results. We cannot assure you that our employee reductions will not impair our ability to continue to develop new products and refine existing products in order to remain competitive. In addition, these reductions could prevent us from successfully execute this strategy. Additionally,marketing our products and developing our customer base.

Our markets are very competitive.

As described above, we compete with many other companies in both our Biosystems and Nucleic Acids operating segments. Many of these competing companies have greater resources than we do or may enjoy other competitive advantages. This may allow them to more effectively market their products to our customers or potential customers, to develop products that make our products obsolete or to produce and sell products less expensively than us. As a result of these competitive factors, demand for and pricing of our products and services could be negatively affected.

The price for our common stock is volatile and may drop further.

The trading price for our common stock has fluctuated significantly over recent years. The volatility in the price of our stock is attributable to a number of factors, not all of which relate to our operating results and financial position. Nevertheless, continued volatility in the market price for our stock should be expected and we cannot assure you that the companies we seek to partner with will not decide to develop novel chemistries and manufacturing capabilities for themselves. Lastly, we cannot assure that these companies will have consistent success in this relatively new area of developing commercially viable genomic-based diagnostic and therapeutic products. In fact, the biopharmaceutical and pharmaceutical companies involved have encountered difficulty in accomplishing this and we have seen varying demand for the products and services we seek to provide to them.

        In positioning ourselves to partner with such companies we must:

We will need to effectively manage our growth if we are to successfully implement our strategy.

        The scopeprice of our business operations has andstock will continue to change and evolve. Such changesincrease in our business and the growth that may accompany them may place a strain on our management and operations. Our ability to manage our growth will depend onfuture. Fluctuations or further declines in the abilityprice of our officers and key employees to continue to implement and improve our operational, management information and financial control systems and to expand, train and manage our work force both in the U.S. and abroad. Our inability to manage our growth effectively couldstock may affect our ability to pursue business opportunitiessell shares of our stock and expandto raise capital through future equity financing.

If we are unable to maintain our business.

Item 2.    Properties.Nasdaq listing, your ability to trade shares of our common stock could suffer.

 

In order for our common stock to remain listed on the Nasdaq National Market (“Nasdaq”), we must meet the minimum listing requirements for continued listing, including, among other requirements, minimum bid price and market value of public float requirements. On March 31, 2005, we were notified that the bid price for our common stock over a 30-day period was below the $1.00 minimum required for continued listing of our common stock on the Nasdaq. In order to remain listed, the minimum bid price for our common stock must be at least $1.00 per share over ten consecutive business days before September 27, 2005. If we are not able to regain compliance with this listing requirement, we may be delisted from the Nasdaq. If our common stock is delisted from the Nasdaq, transactions in our common stock would likely be conducted only in the over-the counter market, or potentially on regional exchanges, which could negatively impact the trading volume and price of our common stock, and investors may find it more difficult to purchase or dispose of, or to obtain accurate quotations as to the market value of, our common stock. In addition, if our common stock were not listed on the Nasdaq and the trading price of our common stock fell below $1.00 per share, trading in our common stock would also be subject to the requirements of certain rules which require additional disclosures by broker-dealers in connection with any trades involving a stock defined as a “penny stock.” In such event, the additional burdens imposed on broker-dealers to effect transactions in our common stock could further limit the market liquidity of our common stock and the ability of investors to trade our common stock.

Our four principalpatents may not protect us from others using our technology that could harm our business and competitive position.

Patent law relating to the scope of claims in the technology fields in which we operate is still evolving. The degree of future protection for our proprietary rights is uncertain. Furthermore, we cannot be certain that others will not independently develop similar or alternative products or technology, duplicate any of our products, or, if patents are issued to us, design around the patented products developed by us. Our patents or licenses could be challenged by litigation and, if the outcome of such litigation were adverse to us, our competitors could be free to use our technology. We may not be able to obtain additional patents for our technology, or if we are able to do so, patents may not provide us with substantial protection or be commercially beneficial. In addition, we could incur substantial costs in litigation if we are required to defend ourselves in patent suits brought by third parties or if we initiate such suits.

We cannot be certain that other measures taken to protect our intellectual property will be effective.

We rely upon trade secret protection, copyright and trademark laws, non-disclosure agreements and other contractual provisions for some of our confidential and proprietary information that is not subject matter for which patent protection is being sought. Such measures, however, may not provide adequate protection for our trade secrets or other proprietary information. If they do not protect our rights, third parties could use our technology and our ability to compete in the market would be reduced.

We are dependent upon our licensed technologies and may need to obtain additional licenses in the future to offer our products and remain competitive.

We have licensed key components of our technologies from third parties. If these agreements were to terminate prematurely due to our breach of the terms of these licenses or we otherwise fail to maintain our rights to such technology, we may lose the right to manufacture or sell a substantial portion of our products. In addition, we may need to obtain licenses to additional technologies in the future in order to keep our products competitive. If we fail to license or otherwise acquire necessary technologies, we may not be able to develop new products that we need to remain competitive.

The patent underlying our nonexclusive license to manufacture standard nucleic acid building blocks expired as of March 15, 2005. The expiration of this patent could result in additional manufacturers entering the market for these products. Some of these manufacturers may have lower cost structures or other competitive advantages which may reduce our market share and/or our operating margins related to these products.

The protection of intellectual property in foreign countries is uncertain.

A significant percentage of our sales are to customers located outside the U.S. The patent and other intellectual property laws of some foreign countries may not protect our intellectual property rights to the same extent as U.S. laws. We may need to bring proceedings to defend our patent rights or to determine the validity of our competitors’ foreign patents. These proceedings could result in substantial cost and diversion of our efforts. Finally, some of our patent protection in the U.S. is not available to us in foreign countries due to the laws of those countries.

Our products could infringe on the intellectual property rights of others.

There are a significant number of U.S. and foreign patents and patent applications submitted for technologies in, or related to, our area of business. As a result, any application or exploitation of our technology could infringe patents or proprietary rights of others and any licenses that we might need as a result of such infringement might not be available to us on commercially reasonable terms, if at all. This may lead others to assert patent infringement or other intellectual property claims against us.

Our failure to comply with any applicable government regulations or otherwise respond to claims relating to improper handling, storage or disposal of hazardous chemicals that we use may adversely affect our results of operations.

Our research and development and manufacturing activities involve the controlled use of hazardous materials and chemicals. We are subject to federal, state, local and international laws and regulations governing the use, storage, handling and disposal of hazardous materials and waste products. If we fail to comply with applicable laws or regulations, we could be required to pay penalties or be held liable for any damages that result and this liability could exceed our financial resources. We cannot assure you that accidental contamination or injury will not occur. Any such accident could damage our research and manufacturing facilities are locatedand operations, resulting in Omaha, Nebraska, San Jose, California, Boulder, Coloradodelays and increased costs.

Item 2.Properties

We own one facility in Glasgow, Scotland. Additionally, corporate administration offices are locatedScotland and lease 14 facilities throughout the world under non-cancelable leases with various terms. As a result of restructuring initiatives initiated in Omaha, Nebraska. 2004 and 2002, a significant amount of leased space is currently unoccupied, and may in certain cases be sublet, to independent third parties.

The following table summarizes information related to property occupied in these locations.

Location

 Square Footage
 Annual Rent
 Lease Term
Expires

Omaha, Nebraska 55,243 $422,260 2007
San Jose, California 14,360 $246,000 2005
Boulder, Colorado 33,673 $336,732 2007
Glasgow, Scotland 14,500 £95,000 2007
Glasgow, Scotland 45,000  N/A Owned Property

        We lease additional facilities for manufacturing, sales, customer support and research and development in Crewe, England, Cramlington, England, Tokyo, Japan, Paris, France, Berlin, Germany, Cambridge, Massachusetts, Gaithersburg, Maryland, Atlanta, Georgia, San Diego, California, Wayne, Pennsylvania and Denver, Colorado.

        As a part of our restructuring plans developed Annual rent amounts presented in the fourth quarter of 2002 our office space requirements have been reduced. As a result, some of our locations will be closed or the amount of spacetable are reflected in thousands.

10



Location


  

Function


  Square
Footage


  Annual
Rent


  

Lease Term
Expires


Owned

             

Glasgow, Scotland

  Phospheramadite Manufacturing  44,212   N/A  N/A

Leased and Occupied

             

Omaha, Nebraska

  WAVE® and Consumable Manufacturing  25,000  $130  June 2007

San Jose, California

  Consumable Manufacturing  14,360  $139  October 2010

Cramlington, England

  Consumable Manufacturing  8,500  $53  March 2006

Omaha, Nebraska

  Multi Functional(1)  18,265  $187  July 2007

Paris, France

  Multi Functional(1)  4,843  $109  January 2007

Gaithersburg, Maryland

  Multi Functional(1)  6,560  $114  May 2006

Cambridge, Massachusetts

  Multi Functional(1)  2,500  $70  January 2007

Leased and Not Occupied(2)

  Multi Functional(1)  55,759  $505  2005 – 2007

leased will be reduced. Our restructuring plans included the closing or reduction of leased office space in Omaha, Nebraska, Crewe, England, San Diego, California and Wayne, Pennsylvania.

(1)Multi Functional facilities include functions related to manufacturing, services, sales and marketing, research and development and/or administration.

(2)Leased and not occupied facilities represent six facilities with gross annual rents of $0.82 million. Certain of these facilities are sublet to independent third parties. Annual rents from these subtenants are expected to total $0.32 million in 2005. We are pursuing sublet tenants for remaining vacated space.

Item 3.Legal Proceedings

Item 3.    Legal Proceedings.

We have been named as a defendant in a lawsuit filed in Spain by a prospective distributor who claims that the Company breached a promise to grant the plaintiff a distributorship for certain of the Company’s products in a specific geographic area in Europe. The plaintiff is seeking monetary relief of approximately $0.50 million. We believe the lawsuit is without merit and intend to vigorously defend this matter.

 

We are not a party, nor are any of our assets or properties subject to anya number of other claims of various amounts, which arise out of the normal course of business. In our opinion, the disposition of claims currently pending will not have a material legal proceedings.adverse effect on our financial position, results of operations or cash flows, after considering amounts already reflected in the consolidated financial statements.

Item 4.Item 4.    Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders.

We did not submit any matters to our stockholders for a vote or other approval during the fourth quarter of the fiscal year covered by this report.

Item 4A.Item 4a.    Executive Officers.

Our executive officers are electedappointed annually by the Board of Directors at the first meeting following the annual stockholder'sstockholders’ meeting. Other officers are electedappointed by the Board of Directors from time to time. Each officer holds office until a successor has been duly elected or appointed and qualified or until the death, resignation or removal of such officer.

 

Our current officers and their ages as of December 31, 20022004 are listed below followed by a brief biography.

Name

Age
Position
Collin J. D'Silva

Name


  44

Age


Position


Collin J. D’Silva

47  Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer and Director
William P. Rasmussen

Michael A. Summers

  5040  Chief Financial Officer
John L. Allbery

Keith A. Johnson

  43Executive Vice President
Keith A. Johnson4346  Vice President, General Counsel

Mitchell L. Murphy

  4548  Vice President, Secretary and Treasurer

Collin J. D'Silva.D’Silva.Mr. D'SilvaD’Silva has served as our Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer since 1997 and is also a Director. Mr. D'Silva,D’Silva, a co-founder of Transgenomic, has worked for Transgenomicthe Company and its predecessors since 1988. Prior to that time, Mr. D'SilvaD’Silva was employed by AT&T from 1980.1980 to 1988. At AT&T, he held various positions in engineering, materials management, sales support and business development. His last position at AT&T was Business Unit Manager and Engineering Manager for a network distribution products division. Mr. D'SilvaD’Silva holds a B.S. degree and a M.Eng. degree in industrial engineering from Iowa State University and an M.B.A. from Creighton University.

        William P. Rasmussen.Michael A. Summers    Mr. Rasmussen.Mr. Summers joined us on October 1, 1998Transgenomic, Inc. in August 2004 and currently serves as our Chief Financial Officer. PriorMr. Summers was employed with C&A Industries, Inc. from 2003 to joining us, Mr. Rasmussen2004 where as General Manager he was responsible for the operations of various divisions that provided human capital management and consulting services. From 2001 to 2003, he was

Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer at I-Mark Systems from 1996 until itfor Nexterna, Inc., a wholly-owned technology subsidiary of the Union Pacific Corporation. From 2000 to 2001, he was purchased in 1997. I-Mark Systems designed integrated computer voting solutions and was a successor corporation of ADD Consulting Inc., which provided computer staffing professionals to numerous industries. Mr. Rasmussen served asthe Chief Financial Officer of ADD Consulting Inc. from 1994 until joining I-Mark Systems in 1996. Mr. Rasmussen owned a travel management company from 1986 to 1998, and he provided consulting services to numerous software and telecommunication companies from 1984 to 1994. Mr. Rasmussen's previous experience also includes serving as Controller and Principal Accounting Officer for Applied Communications, Inc.Able Telcom Holding Corp., a publicly-owned project management and construction company. Prior to 2000, Mr. Summers held various positions including eight years as an auditor for the Omaha, Nebraska office of Deloitte & Touche, LLP. Mr. Summers graduated from 1979 to 1984. Applied Communications, Inc., now known as Transaction Systems Architects, Inc., is a software provider for transaction processing systems. Mr. Rasmussen holdsCreighton University in 1987 with a B.S. degree in Business Administration from the University of Nebraska.business administration with an accounting major. He is a Certified Public Accountant.

        John L. Allbery.    Mr. Allbery joined us in June 2001, and currently serves as an Executive Vice President. Prior to joining us, Mr. Allbery was a private business consultant based in Budapest, Hungary from 2000 to 2001. From 1999 to 2000 Mr. Allbery served as the Chief Financial Officer of The Virtus Group, a private business venture in Budapest, Hungary. Mr. Allbery also spent approximately 20 years in public accounting. Prior to leaving public accounting, Mr. Allbery was a Partner with Deloitte & Touche

11



LLP. Mr. Allbery holds a B.A. degree in Accounting from Doane College and a MBA in Taxation from Golden Gate University.

Keith A. Johnson.Mr. Johnson joined us in 20012002 as Vice President, General Counsel. Mr. Johnson has a B.A. in Biochemistry from Kalamazoo College, an M.B.A. in International Business and Marketing from Michigan State, and a law degree from the University of San Diego. Before joining Transgenomic Mr. Johnson was Director of Intellectual Property, Technology Development and Licensing at Integra LifeSciences in Plainsboro, NJ, from 1999 to 2001. Mr. Johnson'sJohnson’s previous experience also includes Senior Licensing Manager, Rutgers University, from 1998 to 1999 and Technology Licensing Officer, Washington State University, from 1995 to 1998. Mr. Johnson is a member of the state bars of California, Washington, and New Jersey and Nebraska and is admitted to practice before the USPTO.United States Patent and Trade Office.

Mitchell L. Murphy.Mr. Murphy joined us in 1992. His current duties include the overall corporate administration and shareholder relations. Prior to joining Transgenomic, he held accounting and financial management positions for 15 years with companies involved in manufacturing, steel distribution and rebar fabrication for 15 years.fabrication. He spent over two years as an auditor for the Omaha, Nebraska office of Deloitte, Haskins & Sells (now Deloitte & Touche LLP) working in a broad range of industries. Mr. Murphy graduated with honors from Creighton University in 1978 with a B.S. degree in business administration with an accounting major.

12



Part II

Item 5.    Market for Registrant's
Item 5.Market for Registrant’s Common Equity and Related Stockholder Matters.

Our common stock is listed for trading on the NASDAQ National MarketNasdaq under the symbol TBIO. The following table sets forth the high and low closing prices for our common stock during each of the quarters of 20012003 and 2002.2004.

Year Ended December 31, 2001

 High
 Low
First Quarter $10.98 $5.19
Second Quarter $15.00 $5.50
Third Quarter $12.85 $6.01
Fourth Quarter $12.60 $5.45

Year Ended December 31, 2002

 

 

 

 

 

 
First Quarter $10.77 $7.00
Second Quarter $9.00 $2.10
Third Quarter $4.52 $2.39
Fourth Quarter $3.80 $2.15

 

   High

  Low

Year Ended December 31, 2003

        

First Quarter

  $4.22  $1.40

Second Quarter

  $2.43  $0.93

Third Quarter

  $2.14  $1.03

Fourth Quarter

  $2.98  $1.45

Year Ended December 31, 2004

        

First Quarter

  $3.23  $1.96

Second Quarter

  $1.87  $1.24

Third Quarter

  $1.58  $1.07

Fourth Quarter

  $1.52  $1.06

At March 24, 2003,April 14, 2005, there were 23,532,04934,234,922 shares of our common stock outstanding and approximately 3,3003,200 holders of record. The outstanding shares consist of 24,026,653 shares issued less 494,604 shares of treasury stock.

 

We have never declared or paid any cash dividends on our capitalcommon stock and we do not anticipate paying any cash dividends on our common stock in the foreseeable future. We currently expect to retain all earnings, if any, for investment in our business. Dividends on our common stock will be paid only if and when declared by our boardBoard of directors.Directors. The board'sBoard’s ability to declare a dividend is subject to limits imposed by Delaware corporate law. In determining whether to declare dividends, the boardBoard may consider our financial condition, results of operations, working capital requirements, future prospects and other relevant factors.

Item 6.Item 6.    Selected Financial Data.

The statement of operations data for the years ended December 31, 2002, 20012004, 2003 and 20002002 and the balance sheet data as of December 31, 20022004 and 20012003 are derived from our historical consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, which have been audited by Deloitte & Touche LLP, our independent auditors.registered public accounting firm. The statement of operations data for the years ended December 31, 19992001 and 19982000 and the balance sheet data as of December 31, 2000, 19992002, 2001 and 19982000 are derived from our audited historical consolidated financial statements that are not included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. In May 2001, we acquired Annovis, Inc., a specialty chemicals company that develops, manufactures and markets a wide variety of nucleic acid-based products and services for the life science industry, for a total purchase price of approximately $16.9 million. Annovis's results of operations have been included in the accompanying financial statements beginning on May 1, 2001. Additionally, our financial statements include the results from our non-life sciences product line which was sold effective April 1, 2000.

The following selected financial data should be read in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements and the related notes thereto and the information under "Management“Management Discussion and

13



Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations"Operations” included elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

 
 Year Ended December 31,
 
 
 2002
 2001
 2000
 1999
 1998
 
 
 In thousands, except per share data

 
Statement of Operations Data:                
Net sales $37,554 $38,467 $25,883 $23,035 $18,935 
Cost of good sold  19,569  17,198  12,800  12,090  9,590 
  
 
 
 
 
 
Gross profit  17,985  21,269  13,083  10,945  9,345 

Selling, general and administrative

 

 

24,068

 

 

21,497

 

 

14,047

 

 

11,532

 

 

8,160

 
Research and development  12,201  9,372  7,652  6,297  3,159 
Stock based compensation expense  131  139  861     
Restructuring Charges  3,282         
Gain on sale of product line      (784)    
  
 
 
 
 
 
Operating expenses  39,682  31,008  21,776  17,829  11,319 

Loss before income taxes

 

 

(21,260

)

 

(7,377

)

 

(8,481

)

 

(8,082

)

 

(2,506

)

Net loss

 

$

(21,365

)

$

(7,401

)

$

(8,661

)

$

(9,827

)

$

(1,576

)
  
 
 
 
 
 

Basic and diluted net loss per share

 

$

(0.91

)

$

(0.33

)

$

(0.52

)

$

(0.76

)

$

(0.13

)

Basic and diluted weighted average shares outstanding

 

 

23,583

 

 

22,560

 

 

16,630

 

 

13,000

 

 

12,279

 
 
   
As of December 31,

 
 2002
 2001
 2000
 1999
 1998
 
 In thousands

Balance Sheet Data:               
Total assets $74,035 $89,286 $77,863 $19,964 $14,736
Long-term debt, less current portion  1,499      12,538  695
Total stockholders' equity (deficit) $61,515 $82,104 $73,966 $(2,099)$6,649

   Year Ended December 31,

 
   2004

  2003

  2002

  2001(1)

  2000(1)

 
   In thousands, except per share data 

Statement of Operations Data:

                     

Net sales

  $33,789  $33,866  $37,554  $38,467  $25,883 

Cost of good sold

   24,596   24,315   19,569   17,198   12,800 
   


 


 


 


 


Gross profit

   9,193   9,551   17,985   21,269   13,083 

Selling, general and administrative

   17,499   17,324   24,199   21,636   14,908 

Research and development

   6,685   9,305   12,201   9,372   7,652 

Restructuring charges(2)

   3,570   738   3,282   —     —   

Impairment charges(3)

   11,965   4,772   —     —     —   

Gain on sale of facility(4)

   (1,466)  —     —     —     —   

Gain on sale of product line

   —     —     —     —     (784)
   


 


 


 


 


Operating expenses

   38,253   32,139   39,682   31,008   21,776 

Other income (expense)(5)

   (5,406)  (305)  437   2,362   212 
   


 


 


 


 


Loss before income taxes

   (34,466)  (22,893)  (21,260)  (7,377)  (8,481)

Income tax (benefit) expense

   (94)  65   105   24   180 
   


 


 


 


 


Net loss

  $(34,372) $(22,958) $(21,365) $(7,401) $(8,661)
   


 


 


 


 


Basic and diluted loss per share

  $(1.19) $(0.94) $(0.91) $(0.33) $(0.52)

Basic and diluted weighted average shares outstanding

   29,066   24,484   23,583   22,560   16,630 
   As of December 31,

 
   2004

  2003

  2002

  2001

  2000

 
   In thousands 

Balance Sheet Data:

                     

Total assets(6)

  $37,458  $57,306  $74,035  $89,286  $77,863 

Borrowing under Credit Line

   6,514   2,142   —     —     —   

Current portion of long-term debt

   825   1,693   63   —     —   

Long-term debt, less current portion

   2,199   —     1,499   —     —   

Total stockholders’ equity (deficit)

   16,535   45,058   61,515   82,104   73,966 

(1)In May 2001, we acquired Annovis, Inc., a specialty chemicals company that develops, manufactures and markets a wide variety of nucleic acid-based products and services for the life science industry, for a total purchase price of approximately $16.91 million. Annovis’ results of operations have been included in the accompanying financial statements beginning on May 1, 2001. Additionally, our consolidated financial statements include the results from our non-life sciences product line which was sold effective April 1, 2000.

(2)In 2004 and 2002 plans were developed and implemented to reduce expenses thereby better aligning our expense structure with current business prospects. The plans included employee terminations, office closures, termination of collaborations and write-offs of abandoned intellectual property. As a result, restructuring charges were recorded and are included in operating expenses. See Note N to the accompanying consolidated financial statements.

(3)Impairment charges relate primarily to the impairment of goodwill, and in 2004, also include a charge of $2.10 million related to the impairment of property and equipment. See Note C to the accompanying consolidated financial statements.

(4)Gain on sale of facility relates to the sale of our specialty olignucleotide manufacturing facility in Boulder, Colorado during the fourth quarter of 2004. See note M to the accompanying consolidated financial statements.

(5)Other income (expense) for all years presented primarily includes interest expense and in 2004 it includes a loss on debt extinguishment of $2.86 million resulting from certain modifications to our Laurus Loans that were treated as extinguishments for financial reporting purposes. See Note E to the accompanying consolidated financial statements.

(6)The reduction in total assets from December 31, 2003 to December 31, 2004 related primarily to impairment charges of $11.97 million in our Nucleic Acids operating segment (see Notes C and K to the accompanying consolidated financial statements) and the sale of our specialty oligonucleotide manufacturing facility in Boulder, Colorado (see Note M to the accompanying consolidated financial statements). The reduction in total assets from December 31, 2002 to December 31, 2003 related primarily to operating losses that were funded by reductions in cash and cash equivalents and short term investments.

Item 7.    Management's
Item 7.Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.

Overview

 We provide innovative products and services for the synthesis, purification and analysis

Since 2000 (the year of nucleic acids. Our products and services include automated instrument systems, associated consumables, nucleic acid chemical building blocks, nucleic acid synthesis products, novel chemistry development for nucleic acids, process development services and genetic variation discovery services. Our technologies center around three core competencies: separation chemistries, enzymology, and nucleic acid chemistries. We develop, assemble, manufacture and market our products and servicesinitial public offering), we have incurred net losses of $94.76 million generally related to the life sciences industry to be used in research focused on molecular genetics of humans and other organisms. Such research could lead to development of new diagnostics and therapeutics. Our products can be used to analyze DNA or RNA at the molecular level, amplify, separate, and isolate nucleic acid fragments of particular interest and synthesize conventional or chemically-modified nucleic acid molecules. These capabilities are central to research seeking to discover and understand variations in the genetic code, the relationship of these variations to disease and, ultimately, to develop diagnostics and therapeutics based on this understanding. Our business plan is to participate in the value chain associated with these activities by providing key technology, tools, consumables, and biochemical reagents to those entities engaged in basic biomedical research and the development of diagnostics and therapeutic agents.

14



        Prior to 2002 the Company was managed and operated on a fully integrated basis in one operating segment. During 2002, management determined it was appropriate to evaluate the Company's operations based upon the nature of the products and services provided. Accordingly, the Company has determined that it operates in two reportable segments, BioSystems and Nucleic Acids. Operations for these segments are evaluated based upon specific identification of revenues and expenses associated with the business activities resulting in a segment operating income. Expenses that cannot be directly identified to an operating activity or are considered corporate overhead are not allocated to the segments in arriving at operating income for the segment.

        The BioSystems operating segment generates revenue from the sale of automated instrument systems and associated consumable products and services. This segments products are based upon two of the Company's three core competencies, separations chemistries and enzymology. Specifically, this segment's main products are the WAVE system, related bioconsumables and research services.

        Theour Nucleic Acids operating segment, generates revenue from the sale of products and services based upon all three of the Company's core competencies, nucleic acid chemistries, separations chemistries and enzymology. Specifically, this segments main products are nucleic acid building blocks or "phosphoramidites", oligonucleotides, fluorescent markers, dyes and associated reagents and novel chemistry and process development services.

        During the fiscal year ended December 31, 2002, we sold over 185 WAVE Systems to major academic and government research centers and commercial and biopharmaceutical companies. Since the WAVE System product introduction in 1997 we have sold over 900 instruments to customers in over 30 countries. Revenues from the sale of consumable and nucleic acid products increased during 2002 and represented approximately 50% of our net sales as compared to approximately 40% in 2001. We expect that over the next five years, sales from consumable and nucleic acid products will increase both in amount and as a percentage of our net sales.

        We have incurred significant losses resulting principally from costs incurred in research and development and selling, general and administrative costs associated withcosts. Our liquidity and working capital positions continued to deteriorate during 2004 predominately due to operating losses that were funded during the year primarily by borrowings under our operations.Credit Line and the sale of our specialty oligonucleotides facility in Boulder, Colorado. At December 31, 2002,2004, we had an accumulated deficit of $49.8$107.10 million.

To respond to changes in the overall business climate for our products, our liquidity position and our demand for capital, we instituted significant changes during 2004 designed to, among other things, align our cost structure with projected revenues, focus on opportunities in our BioSystems operating segment, and minimize the adverse financial effect of our Nucleic Acids operating segment. While the primary goals of these changes were to provide the foundation for a self-sustaining, growth-oriented company with positive cash flows and earnings, there can be no assurances that we can achieve these goals.

We determined that our Nucleic Acids operating segment was impaired and sold our specialty oligonucleotide facility.

Based upon information obtained through the process of evaluating strategic alternatives for our Nucleic Acids operating segment, we determined that it was more likely than not that the value of the assets associated with this business were impaired. We engaged an external valuation firm to assist us in conducting an interim period impairment test that resulted in a non-cash charge of $11.97 million related to these assets during the three months ended June 30, 2004. The charge consisted of $9.87 million related to the impairment of goodwill and $2.10 million related to the impairment of property and equipment.

On November 11, 2004, we sold the assets associated with our specialty oligonucleotides manufacturing facility in Boulder, Colorado to a subsidiary of Eyetech Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (“Eyetech”). The sale price was $3.00 million in cash plus the assumption of the lease on the Boulder facility and certain equipment leases with a gross value of $2.38 million. Substantially all of the 27 employees at the Boulder facility became Eyetech employees. Net proceeds from the sale (after transaction expenses and fees paid to our investment advisors) equaled approximately $2.70 million. In conjunction with this transaction, we recorded a gain on sale of $1.47 million in the fourth quarter of 2004.

We implemented a restructuring plan to better align costs with expected revenues.

On November 13, 2004, our Board of Directors approved a restructuring plan designed to refocus the Company on its BioSystems business segment and to better align our cost structure with anticipated revenues. The plan (which is incremental to the sale of our Boulder, Colorado facility) included a workforce reduction of approximately 60 positions and the closure of two domestic research and development facilities associated with our nucleic acids operating segment and two European field offices. Additionally, we eliminated 11 positions at our chemical building blocks manufacturing facility in Glasgow, Scotland. In conjunction with these changes, we incurred a charge of $3.57 million during the quarter ending December 31, 2004 related primarily to severance, benefits and facility closures.

We expect the 2004 restructuring plan and the sale of our specialty oligonucleotide manufacturing facility to have a significant impact on our ongoing costs. The pro forma effects on our 2004 loss from operations are as follows.

   

2004

As Reported


  Sale of
Oligonucleotide
Facility


  Restructuring
Plan(1)


  

Impairment

Charges(2)


  

2004

Pro Forma


 
   In thousands 

Net sales

  $33,789  $2,051  $—    $—    $31,738 

Cost of goods sold

   24,596   5,456   706   —     18,434 
   


 


 


 


 


Gross profit (loss)

   9,193   (3,405)  (706)  —     13,304 

Selling, general and administrative

   17,499   33   1,304   —     16,162 

Research and development

   6,685   4   3,068   —     3,613 

Restructuring charges

   3,570   —     3,570   —     —   

Impairment charges (2)

   11,965   —     —     11,965   —   

Gail on sale of facility(3)

   (1,466)  (1,466)  —     —     —   
   


 


 


 


 


Operating expenses

   38,253   37   7,942   10,498   19,776 
   


 


 


 


 


Loss from operations

  $(29,060) $(3,442) $(8,648) $(10,498) $(6,472)
   


 


 


 


 


(1)These restructuring plan pro forma adjustments include the restructuring charge incurred in the fourth quarter of 2004 (see Note N to the accompanying consolidated financial statements) plus actual 2004 direct and identifiable expenses associated with terminated employees and closed offices that were incurred and recorded as costs of goods sold or operating expense prior to the implementation of the restructuring plan. For example, they include personnel costs associated with severed employees, rent associated with closed facilities and other specifically identifiable costs. These costs are not expected to recur in the future. They do not include anticipated additional savings from indirect costs (travel, supplies, etc.) associated with fewer employees and facilities.

(2)The impairment charges in 2004 related to the write-off of all goodwill and impairment of property and equipment in our Nucleic Acids operating segment. We do not expect these charges to recur. Our December 31, 2004 consolidated balance sheet reflects goodwill of $0.64 million that related entirely to our BioSystems operating segment.

(3)The gain on sale of facility related to the sale of our specialty olignucleotide manufacturing facility in Boulder, Colorado.

Results of Operations

Changes in Results of Operations

   Amounts in Thousands       
            Dollar Change

  Percent Change

 
   2004

  2003

  2002

  2003 to
2004


  2002 to
2003


  2003 to
2004


  2002 to
2003


 

Net Sales

                           

Bioinstruments

  $14,385  $17,916  $19,098  $(3,581) $(1,182) (20)% (6)%

Bioconsumables

   8,838   7,260   5,137   1,578   2,123  22 % 41 %

Discovery Services

   2,020   868   —     1,152   868  133 % —   
   


 


 

  


 


 

 

Total BioSystems operating segment

   25,243   26,044   24,235   (801)  1,809  (3)% %

Chemical Building Blocks

   6,488   6,631   13,319   (143)  (6,688) (2)% (50)%

Specialty Oligonucleotides

   2,058   1,191   —     867   1,191  73 % —   
   


 


 

  


 


 

 

Total Nucleic Acids operating segment

   8,546   7,822   13,319   724   (5,497) 9% (41)%
   


 


 

  


 


 

 

Total Net Sales

   33,789   33,866   37,554   (77)  (3,688) (1)% (10)%

Cost of Goods Sold

                           

Bioinstruments

   6,382   7,343   7,650   85   250  1% %

Bioconsumables

   4,012   3,475   2,284   537   1,191  15 % 52 %

Discovery Services

   1,603   557   —     1,046   557  188 % —   
   


 


 

  


 


 

 

Total BioSystems operating segment

   11,997   11,375   9,934   622   1,441  5% 15 %

Chemical Building Blocks

   7,165   6,937   9,635   228   (2,698) 3% (28)%

Specialty Oligonucleotides

   5,434   6,003   —     (569)  6,003  (9)% —   
   


 


 

  


 


 

 

Total Nucleic Acids operating segment

   12,599   12,940   9,635   (341)  3,305  (3)% 34 %
   


 


 

  


 


 

 

Total Cost of Goods Sold

   24,596   24,315   19,569   (281)  4,746  (1)% 24 %

Selling, General and Administrative Expenses

   17,499   17,324   24,199   175   (6,875) 1% (28)%

Research and Development Expenses

   6,685   9,305   12,201   (2,620)  (2,896) (28)% (24)%

Restructuring Charges

   3,570   738   3,282   2,832   (2,544) 384 % (78)%

Impairment Charges

   11,965   4,772   —     5,726   4,772  120 % —   

Gain on sale of facility

   1,466   —     —     1,466   —    —    —   

Other Income (Expense)

   (5,406)  (305)  437   5,102   742  1673 % 170 %

Years Ended December 31, 2004 and 2003

Net Sales. Net sales during 2004 decreased $0.08 million or 1% from 2003 as a result of a $0.80 million or 3% decrease in sales in our BioSystems operating segment offset by a $0.72 million or 9% increase in sales in our Nucleic Acids operating segment.

The decrease in sales in our BioSystems operating segment resulted from a decrease of $3.58 million or 20% from bioinstruments that was partially offset by increases in sales of bioconsumables of $1.58 million or 22% and Discovery Services of $1.15 million or 133%. The decrease of bioinstrument sales was primarily the result of a decline in the number of Wave Systems sold from 122 in 2003 to 107 in 2004. The selling prices of our instruments vary based on the specific model and optional accessories. We had an installed base of approximately 1,200 units at December 31, 2004. The increase in the installed base of instruments continues to drive increases in sales of bioconsumables used with these instruments. The increase in Discovery Services revenue during 2004 was primarily attributable to the discovery services agreements that we entered into with pharmaceutical companies to support their clinical development of oncology therapeutics. We plan to continue to seek opportunities to provide genetic variation discovery and analysis services to pharmaceutical and other customers and believe that these services provide us a significant opportunity to expand revenues in the future.

Nucleic Acids operating segment sales increased by $0.72 million or 9% in 2004 compared to 2003 as a result of a substantial increase in sales of specialty oligonucleotides produced by our facility in Boulder, Colorado as raw materials in DNA-based drug candidates. As a result of the sale of this facility in November 2004, we will no longer manufacture or sell oligonucleotides. Sales of our chemical building block products produced in our Glasgow, Scotland facility were essentially the same in 2004 as in 2003. During 2004, sales of chemical building blocks to Geron Corporation totaled $4.15 million and represented 12% of total consolidated net sales, 49% of total net sales within our Nucleic Acids operating segment and 61% of chemical building blocks revenue. We do not have long-term sales commitments from Geron Corporation and, accordingly, the amount we sell them is subject to change. Revenues from our Nucleic Acids operating segment would be substantially reduced if Geron’s need for our products declined or if it decided to obtain these products from other suppliers.

Costs of Goods Sold.Costs of goods sold include material costs for the products that we sell and substantially all other costs associated with our manufacturing facilities (primarily personnel costs, rent and depreciation). It also includes direct costs (primarily

personnel costs and supplies) associated with our Discovery Services product line. Depreciation expense included in costs of goods sold totaled $2.10 million and $1.74 million in 2004 and 2003, respectively.

Costs of goods sold during 2004 decreased $0.28 million or 1% from 2003 as a result of a $0.62 million or 5% increase in our BioSystems operating segment offset by a $0.34 million or 3% decrease in our Nucleic Acids operating segment. The overall decrease is consistent with the decrease in net sales.

Gross profit was $9.19 million or 27% of total net sales during 2004 compared to $9.55 million and 28% during 2003. A summary of margins by operating segment follows (dollars in thousands):

   2004

  2003

 
   Dollars

  Percent

  Dollar

  Percent

 

BioSystems operating segment

  $13,246  52% $14,669  56%

Nucleic Acids operating segment

   (4,053)  (47)%  (5,118)  (65)%
   

  

 

  

   $9,193  27% $9,551  28%
   

  

 

  

We expect gross profits from our BioSystems operating segment to be within historic ranges of 50% to 60%. As a result of the sale of our Boulder, Colorado facility and the restructuring plan implemented in November 2004, we anticipate that our cost of goods sold will be significantly improved. However, our Nucleic Acids operating segment continues to have excess capacity in its Glasgow, Scotland manufacturing facility that will adversely impact costs of goods sold and margins until demand for our Nucleic Acids building block products increase.

Selling, General and Administrative Expenses. Selling, general and administrative expenses primarily include personnel costs, marketing, travel and entertainment costs, professional fees, and facility costs. These costs totaled $17.50 million in 2004 compared to $17.32 million in 2003, an increase of $0.18 million or 1%. This increase related to a $1.26 million increase in selling expenses offset by a $1.09 million reduction in general and administrative expenses. As a percentage of revenue, selling, general and administrative expenses totaled just over 51% in both 2004 and 2003. Depreciation expense include in selling, general and administrative expenses totaled $1.02 million and $1.28 million in 2004 and 2003, respectively.

Research and Development Expenses. Research and development expenses primarily include personnel costs, supplies, and facility costs. These costs totaled $6.69 million in 2004 compared to $9.31 million in 2003, a decrease of $2.62 million or 28%. As a percentage of revenue, research and development expenses totaled 20% and 27% of revenue in 2004 and 2003, respectively. These decreases related to our focus on expense control, the sale of our Boulder, Colorado facility and the restructuring plan implemented in November 2004. Depreciation expense included in research and development expenses included $0.88 million and $0.89 million in 2004 and 2003, respectively. We expect to continue to invest a substantial portion of our revenues in research and development activities primarily associated with our BioSystems operating segment. Research and development costs are expensed in the year in which they are incurred.

Restructuring Charges. On November 13, 2004, our Board of Directors approved a restructuring plan designed to refocus on the BioSystems operating segment and to better align the Company’s cost structure with anticipated revenues. The plan (which is incremental to the sale of the specialty oligonucleotide manufacturing facility in Boulder, Colorado) included a workforce reduction of approximately 60 positions and the closure of two domestic research and development facilities associated with our Nucleic Acids operating segment and two European field offices. Additionally, we eliminated approximately 10 positions at its chemical building blocks manufacturing facility in Glasgow, Scotland. In conjunction with these changes, we incurred a charge of $3.57 million during the quarter ending December 31, 2004 consisting of severance benefits of $1.41 million, future rents on closed facilities (net of projected sublease rents) of $1.24 million, the write-off of property and equipment specifically attributable to closed facilities of $0.74 million and other costs of $0.18 million. We had accrued expenses associated with this restructuring plan of $1.91 million at December 31, 2004 of which $1.49 million is expect to be paid in 2005.

Impairment Charges.During the second quarter of 2004, our Board of Directors directed us to explore strategic alternatives for the Nucleic Acids operating segment. The process included significant due diligence by us, our advisors and prospective independent buyers and other interested parties. Based upon information obtained through this process, we determined that it was more likely than not that the value of the assets associated with this business were impaired. We engaged an external valuation firm to assist us in conducting an interim period impairment test that resulted in us recording a non-cash charge of $11.97 million related to these assets during the three months ended June 30, 2004. The charge consisted of $9.87 million related to the impairment of goodwill and $2.10 million related to the impairment of property and equipment.

Gain on Sale of Facility. On November 11, 2004, we sold the assets associated with our specialty oligonucleotides manufacturing facility in Boulder, Colorado to a subsidiary of Eyetech Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (“Eyetech”). The sale price was $3.00 million in cash plus the assumption of the lease on the Boulder facility and of certain equipment leases with a gross value of $2.38 million. Net proceeds from the sale (after transaction expenses and fees paid to our investment advisors) equaled approximately $2.70 million. In conjunction with this transaction, we recorded a gain on sale of $1.47 million in the fourth quarter of 2004.

Other Income (Expense). Other expense during 2004 of $5.41 million consisted of interest expense of $2.38 million, loss on debt extinguishment of $2.86 million, and other net expense of $0.16 million which consisted primarily of net investment losses associated with available-for-sales securities (Geron stock). Other expense during 2003 of $0.31 million consisted of interest income of $0.20 million, interest expense of $0.31 million and other net expenses of $0.20 million.

The increase in interest expense resulted from higher average debt balances and interest rates. Gross debt totaled $8.95 million at December 31, 2004 compared to $4.69 million at December 31, 2003. Our Credit Line and Term Note had average balances during 2004 of $5.69 million and $2.73 million, respectively, with weighted average interest rates of 6.39% and 6.48%, respectively. The high and low borrowings under our Credit Line during 2004 were $7.23 million and $2.63 million, respectively. Interest expense in 2004 and 2003 includes amortization of related premiums and discounts of $1.64 million and $0, respectively.

Loss on debt extinguishment totaled $2.86 million during 2004. As described in Note E to the accompanying consolidated financial statements, certain August 31, 2004 modifications to our Laurus Loans were treated as extinguishments for financial reporting purposes since the change in present value of expected cash flows between the original and modified agreements is greater than 10%. As such, we recorded a loss on extinguishment of debt of $2.86 million at August 31, 2004 reflecting the difference between (i) the recorded amount of debt, net of related discounts, of $7.43 million and (ii) the fair value of the new debt instrument of $10.29 million plus the fair value of the new warrants of $0.11 million. The difference between the fair value of the new debt of $10.29 million and the face value of the debt of $8.57 million represents a premium, which will be reflected as a reduction of interest expense over the life of the new debt.

Income Tax Expense.Income tax expense relates solely to our operations in certain foreign countries and certain states. In addition to income tax expense in these jurisdictions, we do not record any income tax benefits due to our cumulative losses in recent years, expected losses in future years and the uncertainty as to whether we will be able to utilize any additional losses as carrybacks. We will continue to assess the recoverability of deferred tax assets and the related valuation allowance. We expect to continue to incur substantiallosses and expect to continue to provide valuation allowances against deferred tax assets. To the extent we begin to generate income in future years and it is determined that such valuation allowance is no longer required, the tax benefit of the remaining deferred tax assets will be recognized. Our deferred tax assets as of December 31, 2004 were $38.29 million and were entirely offset by a valuation allowance. As of December 31, 2004, we had federal net operating loss carryforwards of approximately $91.47 million. Our net operating loss carryforwards will expire at various dates from 2008 through 2024, if not utilized. We also had state income tax loss carryforwards of $37.62 million at December 31, 2004. These carryforwards will also expire at various dates beginning in 2005 if not utilized.

Years Ended December 31, 2003 and 2002

Net Sales.Net sales decreased in 2003, as compared to 2002, due to a significant decline in demand for our Nucleic Acids products. Sales in our Nucleic Acids operating segment decreased due to a significant decline in demand for our chemical building block products. These products are used by our biopharmaceutical and pharmaceutical customers as raw materials in DNA based drug candidates. The decrease in demand is largely attributable to the timing of completion and/or failure of Phase III clinical trials by certain of our large customers. This decrease in demand for DNA building blocks in 2003 was partially offset by sales of oligonucleotides generated by our start-up manufacturing facility in Boulder, Colorado.

Sales in our BioSystems operating segment increased in 2003. Revenues from sales of WAVE systems and related services were relatively flat with 2002. However, bioconsumable product sales strength resulted from increased WAVE related consumable usage as the installed base of WAVE Systems has increased and as researchers begin to use them more extensively in place of other methods of DNA analysis. Also contributing to the increase were revenues generated by new product sales including our Optimase product line that was launched in 2002 and began to see increased usage in 2003. Sales of WAVE systems declined slightly from 2002 to 2003 offset by an increase in related services revenues. The slight decline in systems sales was mainly due to continued low sales volumes to our North American customer base. Increased services revenue was attributable to our focus on providing genetic variation discovery and analysis services to our pharmaceutical base of customers.

Cost of Goods Sold.Cost of goods sold increased in 2003 over 2002 despite the decline in our revenues. This increase was anticipated and was attributable mainly to excess manufacturing capacity in our Nucleic Acids operating segment. The BioSystems operating segment cost of goods sold as a percentage of sales declined year over year but remained within historical ranges at approximately 43%. The margins in our Nucleic Acids operating segment were negatively impacted by higher manufacturing costs and excess capacity due largely to our plant expansion efforts in Glasgow, Scotland and Boulder, Colorado.

Selling, General and Administrative Expenses.Selling, general and administrative expenses decreased significantly from 2002 to 2003 as a result of our restructuring activities and focus on expense control. Nearly half of the total decrease was in personnel and personnel related expenses as we significantly reduced our employee headcount. Additionally, reductions in outside services, advertising, sales promotions, depreciation and travel expenses accounted for approximately 30% of the total decrease.

Research and Development Expenses.Research and development expenses decreased significantly as a result of our restructuring activities and focus on expense control. Over 60% of the total decrease was in personnel and personnel related expenses as we significantly reduced our employee headcount. Additionally, significant reductions in outside services, supplies, depreciation and travel expenses were realized. During 2003 there were no capitalized software costs, whereas in the prior year we capitalized approximately $1.13 million of development costs. Research and development expenses consist of salaries and related personnel costs of researchers and software developers, material costs for prototypes and test units, legal expenses relating to intellectual property research and application development activities, testing and enhancement of our products, and amortization of intellectual property. We expense our research and development costs in the year in which they are incurred with the exception of certain capitalized software development costs.

Restructuring Charges.During the fourth quarter of 2002 management formulated and selling, generalexecuted a significant portion of a restructuring plan. The plan was developed to reduce expenses thereby better aligning the Company’s expense structure with current business prospects. The plan included employee terminations, office closures, termination of collaborations and administrative costs.write-offs of abandoned intellectual property. We continued to execute the plan during the first half of 2003 resulting in the additional charges recorded in 2003. These charges consisted of mainly employee severance costs and the write-off of a note receivable related to the abandonment of a product development collaboration. The note receivable write-off was a non-cash charge of $0.35 million.

Goodwill Impairment Charge.Statement of Financial Accounting Standard (SFAS) No. 142,Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets, establishes guidelines for accounting for goodwill and other intangible assets and provides that goodwill and other intangible assets with indefinite lives will not be amortized, but will be evaluated for impairment annually. The Company engaged an external valuation firm to assist with the completion of its annual impairment test during the fourth quarter of 2003. As a result of this test we recorded a non-cash goodwill impairment charge of $4.77 million related to our nucleic acids segment.

Income Taxes.The Company’s tax expense relates to its operations in certain foreign countries and certain states. No tax benefits are being recorded due to our cumulative losses in recent years, expected losses in future years and the uncertainty as to whether we will be able to utilize any additional losses as carrybacks. We will continue to assess the recoverability of deferred tax assets and the related valuation allowance. We expect to continue to incur losses and expect to continue to provide valuation allowances against deferred tax assets. To the extent we begin to generate income in future years and it is determined that such valuation allowance is no longer required, the tax benefit of the remaining deferred tax assets will be recognized. Our deferred tax assets as of December 31, 2003 were $30.60 million and were entirely offset by a valuation allowance. As of December 31, 2003, we had federal net operating loss carryforwards of approximately $78.50 million. We also had state income tax loss carryforwards of $28.70 million at December 31, 2003.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Our working capital positions at December 31, 2004 and 2003 were as follows:

   December 31,

    
   2004

  2003

  Change

 
   In thousands 

Current assets(1)

  $17,908  $24,378  $(6,470)

Current liabilities

   18,724   12,248   6,476 
   


 

  


Working Capital

  $(816) $12,130  $(12,946)
   


 

  


(1)Current assets include cash and cash equivalents of $1.00 million and $1.24 million at December 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively.

The deterioration of our working capital position during 2004 was predominately due to operating losses that were funded primarily by borrowings under our Credit Line, the sale of our specialty oligonucleotides facility in Boulder, Colorado and the reclassification at December 31, 2004 of a portion of our chemical building blocks inventory with a book value of $2.86 million as a long-term asset rather than as a current asset. The reclassification of these inventories was based on sales forecasts for these products. As of March 31, 2005, we had cash and cash equivalents of $1.37 million plus an additional $2.29 million available under our Credit Line.

While we expect our existing sources of liquidity to be sufficient to meet our cash needs for 2005, there can be no assurances that they will be, especially if we do not generate net positive cash flows from operations in 2005. It is essential that we achieve revenue growth in our BioSystems operating segment and manage costs according to our existing plan. Our projected liquidity needs may or may not be realized based upon actual operating results and capital project requirements. Accordingly, if our existing cash balances, cash generated by operations, and available borrowings under the Credit Line are insufficient to satisfy our liquidity requirements, we may need to sell additional equity or debt securities or obtain additional credit arrangements, sell certain assets or further reduce expenses. We are monitoring our liquidity position and are prepared to take appropriate measures, as needed, to address liquidity. We cannot assure you that any financing arrangement will be available in amounts or on terms acceptable to us. Our failure to raise additional capital, if needed, would harm our financial condition, results of operations and our business.

Laurus Loans. The Credit Line is a $7.50 million line of credit that we entered into with Laurus in December 2003. The term of the Credit Line is three years carrying an interest rate of 2.0% over the prime rate or a minimum of 6.0%. Funds available under the Credit Line are determined by a borrowing base equal to 90% of eligible accounts receivable balances plus up to $1.00 million related to inventory balances. The Credit Line is secured by most of our assets. Prior to amendments to the Credit Line discussed below, payment of interest and principal could, under certain circumstances, be made with shares of our common stock at a fixed conversion price of $2.20 per share. Conversion of this debt to common stock may be made at the election of Laurus or the Company. We could elect to convert only if our shares trade at a price exceeding $2.42 per share for ten consecutive trading days, and such conversion is further subject to trading volume limitations and a limitation on the total beneficial ownership by Laurus of our common stock. Upon entering into the Credit Line, we issued warrants to Laurus to acquire 550,000 shares of the our common stock at an exercise price exceeding the average trading price of our common stock over the ten trading days prior to the date of the warrant.

In February 2004, we entered into the $2.75 million Term Note with Laurus. The Term Note carries an interest rate of 2.0% over the prime rate or a minimum of 6.0% and has a term of 3 years. Prior to amendments to the Term Note discussed below, the principal and interest on the Term Note could be converted into our common stock at a fixed conversion price of $2.61 per share. Upon entering the Term Note, we issued warrants to Laurus to acquire 125,000 shares of our common stock. Borrowings under the Term Note were primarily used to retire the mortgage debt on our Glasgow, Scotland facility. Remaining borrowings of approximately $0.75 million were used to complete the build-out of the Glasgow facility, complete the consolidation our Glasgow operations into the new facility and provide funds for operations.

In February 2004, Laurus waived the borrowing base limitation on the Credit Line, thereby making the full $7.50 million facility available to us regardless of the available collateral. On August 31, 2004, Laurus agreed to extend the borrowing base waiver on the Credit Line through March 19, 2005. In addition, Laurus deferred certain payments due under the Term Note and reduced the interest rate on both of the Laurus Loans to 0% for any day the closing sale price of our common stock is at or above $1.75 per share. In return, we lowered the conversion price on each of the Laurus Loans to $1.00 per share and issued a warrant to Laurus covering an additional 400,000 common shares at an exercise price of $1.25 per share. The closing price of our common stock on August 31, 2004 was $1.20 per share.

On March 18, 2005, Laurus agreed to further extend the borrowing base waiver on the Credit Line until March 31, 2006. In connection with this waiver, we agreed to allow Laurus to convert $1.87 million of the outstanding principal balance under the Credit Line into 3,600,000 shares of common stock. In addition, on March 24, 2005 we agreed to allow Laurus to convert $0.65 million of the outstanding principal balance of the Term Note into 1,250,000 shares of common stock. As a result, we have increased the amount available under the Credit Line by $1.87 million and have eliminated substantially all remaining 2005 scheduled principal payments on the Term Loan.

Analysis of Cash Flows

Cash flows used in operating activities totaled $9.10 million during 2004 compared to $13.25 million during 2003. The use in 2004 related primarily to a net loss of $34.37 million offset by non-cash charges of $21.18 million. Non-cash charges consisted of depreciation and amortization, certain restructuring charges, impairment charges, certain financing costs and loss on debt extinguishment. Working capital and other adjustments increased cash flows from operating activities by $4.09 million.

Cash flows from investing activities totaled $2.38 million during 2004 compared to cash flows used in investing activities of $2.72 million during 2003. The investing cash flows generated in 2004 were from the sale of our specialty oligoneucleotide manufacturing facility and reductions in other assets that were offset by purchases of property and equipment.

Cash flows from financing activities totaled $6.00 million during 2004 compared to $7.30 million during 2003. The cash from financing activities in 2004 relate primarily to net draws on our Credit Line and proceeds from the Term Note that were offset by payments of long-term debt.

Obligations and Commitments

Our ongoing capital commitments consist of debt service requirements and obligations under capital leases. The following table sets forth our contractual obligations as of December 31, 2004 along with cash payments due in each period indicated:

   Payments Due by Period

   2005

  2006

  2007

  2008

  2009 and
Thereafter


   In thousands

Credit Line(1)

  $5,948  $—    $—    $—    $—  

Term Note (1)

   850   900   850   —     —  

Operating lease payments (2)

   1,958   1,382   486   187   372
   

  

  

  

  

Total contractual obligations

  $8,756  $2,282  $1,336  $187  $372
   

  

  

  

  

(1)Interest payments under the Laurus Loans are paid monthly based on outstanding debt and prevailing interest rates. We currently expect to pay total interest on these loans of between $0.60 million and $0.75 million during 2005.

(2)These are gross lease commitments. Certain facilities underlying these commitments are sublet to independent third parties. Annual rents from these tenants are expected to total $0.32 million, $0.17 million and $0.02 million in 2005, 2006 and thereafter, respectively.

At December 31, 2004, we had firm commitments totaling $0.80 million to Hitachi High Technologies America to purchase components used in our WAVE Systems. These commitments will be fulfilled during 2005.

Off Balance Sheet Arrangements

At December 31, 2004 and 2003, we did not have any relationships with unconsolidated entities or financial partnerships, such as entities often referred to as structured finance or special purpose entities, which would have been established for the purpose of facilitating off-balance sheet arrangements or other contractually narrow or limited purposes.

Critical Accounting Policies

 

Accounting policies used in the preparation of the consolidated financial statements may involve the use of management judgments and estimates. Certain of the Company'sCompany’s accounting policies are considered critical as they are both important to the portrayal of the Company'sCompany’s financial statements and they require significant or complex judgments on the part of management. Our judgments and estimates are based on experience and assumptions that we believe are reasonable under the circumstances. Further, we evaluate our judgments and estimates from time to time as circumstances change. Actual financial results based on judgment or estimates may vary under different assumptions or circumstances. The following are certain critical accounting policies that may involve the use of judgment or estimates.

Allowance for Doubtful AccountsAccount.Accounts receivable are shown net of an allowance for doubtful accounts. In determining an allowance for doubtful accounts, we consider the following.

    The age of the accounts receivable,

    Customer credit history,

    Customer financial information,

    Reasons for non-payment, and

    Our knowledge of the customer.

15


     

    If our customers'customers’ financial condition were to deteriorate, resulting in a change in their ability to make payment, additional allowances may be required.

    Inventories.Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market. Cost is computed using standard costs for finished goods and average or latest actual cost for raw materials and work in process.

    Depreciation and Amortization of Long-Lived Assets.The Company'sCompany’s long-lived assets consist primarily of property, plant and equipment, goodwill, patents, intellectual property and capitalized software development costs. We believe the useful lives we assigned to these assets are reasonable. If our assumptions about these assets change as a result of events or circumstances and we believe the assets may have declined in value we may record impairment charges resulting in lower profits. Property and equipment are carried at cost. Depreciation and amortization are computed using the straight-line and accelerated methodsmethod over the estimated useful lives of the related assets ranging from 3 to 15 years. The Company capitalizes the external and in-house legal costs and filing fees associated with obtaining patents on its new discoveries and amortizes these costs using the straight-line method over the shorter of the legal life of the patent or its economic life, generally 17 years, beginning on the date the patent is issued. Intellectual property, which is purchased technology, is recorded at cost and is amortized over its estimated useful life.

    Impairment of Long-Lived Assets.The Company evaluates goodwill for impairment on an annual basis. The Company assesses the recoverability of long-lived assets whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. These computations utilize judgments and assumptions inherent in management'smanagement’s estimate of future undiscounted

    and discounted cash flows to determine recoverability of these assets. If management'smanagement’s assumptions about these assets were to change as a result of events or circumstances, the Company may be required to record an impairment loss.

    Revenue Recognition.Revenue on the sales of products is recognized in accordance with the terms of the sales arrangement. Such recognition is based on receipt of an unconditional customer order and transfer of title and risk of ownership to the customer, typically upon shipment of the product. Our sales terms do not provide for the right of return unless the product is damaged or defective. Revenues from certain services associated with our analytical instruments, to be performed subsequent to shipment of the products, is deferred and recognized when the services are provided. Such services, mainly limited to installation and training services that are not essential to the functionality of the instruments, typically are performed in a timely manner subsequent to shipment of the instrument.

    Results of OperationsRecently Issued Accounting Pronouncements

    Years Ended

    On December 31, 2002 and 2001

            Net Sales.    Net sales decreased 2% to $37.6 million in 2002 from $38.5 million in 2001. Sales in our BioSystems operating segment decreased 14% to $24.2 million in 2002 from $28.0 million in 2001. Total revenues from sales of WAVE Systems decreased 19% to $18.8 million in 2002 from $23.1 million in 2001. Bioconsumable product sales included in this operating segment increased 10% to $5.4 million in 2002 from $4.9 million in 2001. Sales in our Nucleic Acid operating segment increased 28% to $13.3 million in 2002 from $10.4 million in 2001. Sales of WAVE systems declined mainly due to lower sales volumes to our commercial and industrial customer base and our North American customer base. Systems sold to our commercial and industrial customers accounted for approximately 6% of unit sales in 2002 as compared to approximately 34% in 2001. Systems sold in North America accounted for approximately 25% of unit sales in 2002 as compared to approximately 40% in 2001. Sales of WAVE related consumable products increased as16, 2004, the installed base of WAVE Systems has increased and as researchers begin to use them more extensively in place of other methods of DNA analysis. The increase in nucleic acid product sales is attributable to the timing of our acquisition of Annovis, Inc. in May 2001. Part of our business strategy for

    16


    2003 is to position ourselves as a unique partner to biopharmaceutical and pharmaceutical companies in the early stages of their efforts to develop genomic-based diagnostics and therapeutics. As part of this strategy we are focusing our sales efforts on large consumers of our Synthetic Nucleic Acid products who are willing to commit to long-term supply agreements. While we expect to see increased sales of these products based upon this strategy, we also may see varying demand depending largely on the success of the biopharmaceutical and pharmaceutical companies on which we are targeting our sales efforts and thus we may see large variations in revenue flows for these products.

            Cost of Goods Sold.    Cost of goods sold increased 14% to $19.6 million in 2002 from $17.2 million in 2001, representing 52% of net sales in 2002 and 45% of net sales in 2001. Both total cost of goods sold and cost of goods sold as a percent of sales increased year over year due to the mix of products sold. BioSystems sales margins improved year over year mainly due to higher average selling prices per system resulting from greater sales of our higher margin high throughput WAVE system. The average sales price per instrument increased approximately 10% in 2002. The higher margins on our BioSystems products were offset by lower margins in our nucleic acid operating segment. Currently our nucleic acid products, which have become a larger percentage of our total revenues, are sold at lower margins compared to our WAVE systems. The margins in our Nucleic Acids operating segment are lower due to bulk sales of nucleic acid building block products and higher manufacturing costs due largely to our plant expansion efforts in Glasgow, Scotland and Boulder, Colorado. In 2003 we anticipate that our cost of goods sold for our BioSystems products will remain within historical averages or improve slightly. Overall we anticipate that our cost of goods sold will be consistent with 2002 or slightly higher. This is the result of the under utilization of our new oligonucleotide production facility in Boulder, Colorado. After 2003, we anticipate that the overall cost of goods sold percentage will improve as we refine our systems configurations potentially reducing material costs, improve upon production methods in our Nucleic Acid operating segment which currently result in higher overall manufacturing costs and as product revenues increase thereby spreading our fixed production costs over a larger revenue base.

            Selling, General and Administrative Expenses.    Selling, general and administrative expenses increased 12% to $24.1 million in 2002 from $21.5 million in 2001. This increase is the result of additional personnel and personnel-related expenses, bad debt expense and the write-off of a portion of notes receivable. These increases were offset by a reduction in goodwill amortization and foreign currency exchange rate gains. Combined these items accounted for over 90% of the total increase. Direct personnel expenses increased due to our expanded employee base during 2002. Bad debt expense increased as we felt it was appropriate to increase the allowance for bad debt given our increased levels of accounts receivable. The decrease in goodwill amortization is the result of our adoption ofFinancial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS)(“SFAS”) No. 142,Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets. Total selling, general and administrative expenses represented 64% of net sales123R, Share-Based Payment. SFAS No.123R addresses the accounting for share-based payment transactions in 2002 versus 56% of net saleswhich an enterprise receives employee services in 2001. During the fourth quarter of 2002 management formulated a restructuring planexchange for the Company and executed a significant portion(a) equity instruments of the plan. The plan included employee terminations, office closures,enterprise or (b) liabilities that are based on the termination of collaborations and write-offs of intellectual property. It is expected that, as a resultfair value of the restructuring, our total operating expenses willenterprise’s equity instruments or that may be initially decreasedsettled by 20%the issuace of such equity instruments. SFAS No. 123R eliminates the ability to 25% from 2002 levels.

            Researchaccount for share-based compensation transactions using Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25 and Development Expenses.    Research and development expenses increased 30% to $12.2 million in 2002 from $9.4 million in 2001. Research and development expenses consist of salaries and related personnel costs of researchers and software developers, material costs for prototypes and test units, legal expenses relating to intellectual property research and application development activities, testing and enhancement of our products, and amortization of intellectual property. We expense our research and development costs in the year in which they are incurred with the exception of certain capitalized software development costs. The increase in these expenses is attributable to increased personnel and personnel related expenses resulting from an expanded employee base during 2002, depreciation, amortization and supplies offset by increased amounts of capitalized software expenses related to the WAVE system operating software. Combined these itemsgenerally requires that such transactions be accounted for over 90% of the total increase. Total research and

    17



    development expenses represented 32% of net sales in 2002 versus 24% of net sales in 2001. During the fourth quarter of 2002 management formulatedusing a restructuring plan for the Company and executed a significant portion of the plan. The plan included employee terminations, office closures, the termination of collaborations and write-offs of intellectual property. It is expected that, as a result of the restructuring, our total operating expenses will be initially decreased by 20% to 25% from 2002 levels.

            Stock Based Compensation.    Stock based compensation expense was $131,000 in 2002 as compared to $139,000 in 2001. This expense represents the amortization of deferred compensation related to stock options issued.

            Restructuring Charges.    During the fourth quarter of 2002 management formulated and executed a significant portion of a restructuring plan. The plan was developed to reduce expenses thereby better aligning the Company's expense structure with current business prospects. The plan included employee terminations, office closures, termination of collaborations and write-offs of abandoned intellectual property. Specifically, in the fourth quarter of 2002 the Company notified approximately 60 employees of their termination, notified landlords of our intent to close four facilities and reduce our space commitment under lease at two other facilities, terminated certain consulting and collaboration agreements and abandoned certain patents. As a result of the plan $3.3 million in restructuring charges were recorded and are included in operating expenses. These charges consisted of approximately $800,000 of employee severance costs, $1.2 million in office closure related costs, $400,000 of collaboration and other agreement termination charges and $900,000 in write-offs of abandoned intellectual property. Approximately 45% of the total charges were for non-cash items. We expect that, as a result of the restructuring, our total operating expenses will be initially decreased by 20% to 25% from 2002 levels. Additional restructuring charges totaling between $500,000 and $700,000 are expected in the first half of 2003.

            Other Income (Expense).    Other income and expense, which consists mainly of net interest income and expense, decreased to income of $437,000 in 2002 from income of $2.4 million in 2001. Interest income for the year was $626,000 as compared to $2.5 million in 2001. Interest expense for the year was $62,000 as compared to $58,000 in 2001. The decrease in interest income is a result of declining interest rates on investments and reductions in our short-term investment balances. We expect interest income to decline in 2003 as short-term interest rates are expected to continue to be low and as we continue to use cash in our operating and investing activities. Additionally, interest expense will increase in 2003 due to the long-term debt obtained by the Company during 2002 and the recently committed line of credit.

            Income Taxes.    No income tax benefit was recorded in 2002 or 2001. No further tax benefits are being recorded due to our cumulative losses in recent years, expected losses in future years and the uncertainty as to whether we will be able to utilize any additional losses as carrybacks. We will continue to assess the recoverability of deferred tax assets and the related valuation allowance.fair-value-based method. We expect to continue to incur losses and expect to continue to provide valuation allowances against deferred tax assets. To the extent we begin to generate income in future years and it is determined that such valuation allowance is no longer required, the tax benefit of the remaining deferred tax assets will be recognized. Income tax expense in 2002 was $105,000 while in 2001 income tax expense was $24,000. During 2002 the Company recorded current tax expense related to its Japan branch operations and certain state taxes. Our deferred tax assets as of December 31, 2002 were $23.2 million and were offset by a valuation allowance of $23.2 million. Our deferred tax assets as of December 31, 2001 were $14.9 million and were offset by a valuation allowance of $14.9 million. As of December 31, 2002, we had federal net operating loss carryforwards of approximately $60.3 million. We also had federal research and development tax credit carryforwards of approximately $0.9 million. The net operating loss and credit carryforwards will expire at various dates from 2008 through 2022, if not utilized. We also had state income tax loss carryforwards of $22.2 million at December 31, 2002. These carryforwards will also expire at various dates beginning in 2008 if not utilized.

    18



    Years Ended December 31, 2001 and 2000

            Net Sales.    Net sales increased 49% to $38.5 million in 2001 from $25.9 million in 2000. Total revenues from sales of WAVE® Systems increased 25% to $23.5 million in 2001 from $18.8 million in 2000. Consumable product sales and other revenue increased to $15.0 million in 2001 from $4.9 million in 2000. Most of the increase in consumable sales and other revenue came from our Synthetic Nucleic Acid products, obtained through our acquisition of Annovis, Inc. in May 2001, which accounted for approximately 64% of our consumable product sales and other revenue. Additionally, WAVE related consumable products revenue increased approximately 32% to $3.1 million in 2001 from $2.1 million in 2000. Sales of WAVE related consumable products increased as the installed base of WAVE® Systems has increased and as researchers begin to use them more extensively in place of other methods of DNA analysis. Sales of our non-life sciences instrument products were $2.2 million in 2000. There were no sales in 2001 as a result of our divestiture ofadopt this product line effective Aprilstandard on January 1, 2000.

            Cost of Goods Sold.    Cost of goods sold increased 34% to $17.2 million in 2001 from $12.8 million in 2000, representing 45% of net sales in 2001 and 49% of net sales in 2000. Cost of goods sold as a percent of sales improved year over year due to improved margins on our WAVE systems sales offset by the lower margin bulk sales of our Synthetic Nucleic Acid products. Systems sales margins improved due to lower combined material and manufacturing costs for our life science instruments, higher average selling prices per systems and the sale of our lower margin non-life sciences instrument product line in 2000. The average sales price per instrument increased approximately 5% in 2001. The improved margins in systems sales were offset by a lower margin on consumable sales. The consumable sales margin was lower due mainly to bulk sale pricing discounts.

            Selling, General and Administrative Expenses.    Selling, general and administrative expenses increased 53% to $21.5 million in 2001 from $14.0 million in 2000. This increase is the result of additional personnel and personnel-related expenses and depreciation. The average selling, general and administrative personnel counts increased 32% to 131 in 2001 from 99 in 2000. This personnel increase was due largely to the acquisition of Annovis. Direct personnel expenses and increased travel and travel related expenses associated with the activities of our expanded staff accounted for approximately 37% of the total increase. Increased rent and depreciation expense associated with investments in offices and equipment supporting our expanded staff accounted for approximately 34% of the total increase. Total selling, general and administrative expenses represented 56% of net sales in 2001 versus 54% of net sales in 2000.

            Research and Development Expenses.    Research and development expenses increased 23% to $9.4 million in 2001 from $7.7 million in 2000. Research and development expenses consist of salaries and related personnel costs of researchers and software developers, material costs for prototypes and test units, legal expenses relating to intellectual property research and application development activities, testing and enhancement of our products, and amortization of intellectual property. We expense our research and development costs in the year in which they are incurred with the exception of certain capitalized software development costs. The increase in these expenses is attributable to increased personnel and personnel related expenses and professional services fees associated with the expanded activities of the staff. The average research and development personnel count increased 27% to 73 in 2001 from 57 in 2000. This increase in personnel was due largely to the acquisition of Annovis. Salaries, payroll taxes and benefits accounted for approximately 49% of the total increase. We supplement the expanded activities of our staff through the engagement of external consultants. Increased professional services fees accounted for approximately 51% of the total increase in research and development expenses. Total research and development expenses represented 30% of net sales in 2000 versus 24% of net sales in 2001.

            Stock Based Compensation.    Stock based compensation expense was $139,000 in 2001 as compared to $861,000 in 2000. Stock based compensation expense was higher in 2000 as we accelerated the vesting of 71,700 options in connection with the sale of our non-life sciences instrument product line. Former

    19



    employees who were associated with our non-life sciences product line held these options. The acceleration resulted in the recording of $600,000 of stock based compensation expense in the first quarter of 2000.

            Gain on Sale of Product Line.    Effective April 1, 2000 we sold the assets related to our non-life sciences instrument product line to enable us to focus our business plan on the genomics segment of the life sciences industry. The assets were sold for a total adjusted purchase price of $5.65 million plus reimbursement by the buyer of approximately $400,000 of expenses paid by us since March 31, 2000 in connection with this product line. At the date of the transaction the gain to be recognized on the sale of the assets was deferred until we received all proceeds from the buyer. All such proceeds were received on December 29, 2000 and a gain on the sale of $784,000, before taxes, was recognized.

            Other Income (Expense).    Other income and expense, which consists mainly of net interest income and expense, increased to income of $2.4 million in 2001 from income of $212,000 in 2000. Interest expense for the year was $58,000 as compared to $1.8 million in 2000. During 2000 we carried a large amount of debt that was either paid or converted into common stock subsequent to our initial public offering in July 2000. As a result of the elimination of debt from our balance sheet we incurred little interest expense in 2001. Interest income for the year was $2.5 million as compared to $2.0 million in 2000. The increase in interest income is a result of the investment of the net proceeds from our initial public offering. Interest income on investments during 2001 was negatively impacted by the significant decline in short-term interest rates

            Income Taxes.    Income tax expense in 2001 was $24,000 as compared to $180,000 in 2000. The expense recorded in 2000 relates to the recognized gain on the sale of the assets related to our non-life sciences product line. Income tax expense in 2001 is related to our sales branch in Japan. Our deferred tax assets as of December 31, 2001 were $14.9 million and were offset by a valuation allowance of $14.9 million. Our deferred tax assets as of December 31, 2000 were $7.6 million and were offset by a valuation allowance of $7.6 million. No tax benefit related to our net operating losses is being recorded due to our cumulative losses in recent years, expected losses in the future and the uncertainty as to whether we will be able to utilize any additional losses as carryforwards. We will continue to assess the recoverability of deferred tax assets and the related valuation allowance. We expect to continue to incur losses and expect to continue to provide valuation allowances against deferred tax assets. To the extent we begin to generate income in the future and it is determined that such valuation allowance is no longer required, the tax benefit of the remaining deferred tax assets will be recognized. As of December 31, 2001, we had federal net operating loss carryforwards of approximately $38.0 million. We also had federal research and development tax credit carryforwards of approximately $0.7 million. The net operating loss and credit carryforwards will expire at various dates from 2008 through 2021, if not utilized. We also had state income tax loss carryforwards of $15.4 million at December 31, 2001. These carryforwards will also expire at various dates beginning in 2008 if not utilized.

    Liquidity and Capital Resources

            We have experienced net losses and negative cash flows from operations during the past three years. As a result, we had an accumulated deficit of $49.8 million as of December 31, 2002. As of December 31, 2002 and 2001, we had approximately $9.7 million and $19.6 million, respectively, in cash and cash equivalents. In addition, as of December 31, 2002 and 2001, we had approximately $3.6 million and $23.9 million in short-term investments for total cash and short-term investments of approximately $13.3 million and $43.5 million, respectively.

            During 2002 our major cash expenditures were the funding of our operations that resulted in an operating loss and capital projects. A total of approximately $30.2 million of cash and investments was used with approximately $17.9 million used to fund our operations and $11.5 million for capital projects. Operating activities were funded through existing cash while capital projects were funded through existing cash, a long-term mortgage loan and an operating lease line of credit. Major capital projects during the

    20


    year included facility build-out, expansion and improvement at our two nucleic acid production facilities in Boulder, Colorado and Glasgow, Scotland. The Boulder facility project is designed to bring on line a cGMP (Good Manufacturing Practices) facility for the synthesis of oligonucleotides. This facility began non-GMP production operations during the first quarter of 2003 and is expected to begin cGMP production in the second quarter of 2003. The Glasgow facility project, which produces nucleic acid building blocks, included 2 main objectives, the upgrading of equipment and processes at the current production facility and the opening of a new facility that will include significant capacity expansion along with further equipment and process improvements. The current production facility improvements were completed during the year and the first production line, or pilot line, in the new facility is expected to be completed in the first half of 2003.

            Our operating activities resulted in net outflows of $17.9 million in 2002, $11.1 million in 2001 and $4.7 million in 2000. The operating cash outflows for these periods resulted mainly from our operating losses. Significant investments in research and development and sales and marketing contributed to the operating losses. The operating cash outflows for 2002 are significantly higher than those in the prior year due in large part to increased operating losses and increased inventory balances offset by a reduction in accounts receivable and an increase in accounts payable. Inventory balances increased as raw materials, work in process and finished goods inventory related to our specialty chemicals consumable products were increased as we continue to expand production capabilities and plan for production needs.

            Net cash provided by investing activities was $5.9 million in 2002 as compared to cash used of $9.4 million for 2001 and $22.2 million in 2000. The investing cash flow in 2002 is due primarily to the net transfer of short-term investment funds to cash offset by investment in property, plant and equipment. Cash used in investing activities in 2001 was due primarily to investments in property, plant and equipment and cash used in the acquisition of Annovis, Inc. Cash used in investing activities in 2000 was due primarily to the net transfer of cash to short-term investments and investment in property, plant and equipment. During 2003 we expect to continue to make significant investments in property, plant and equipment. Our capital expenditures budget for 2003 is approximately $8.4 million and includes expenditures for the completion of our facility expansion projects in Glasgow, Scotland, and Boulder, Colorado and for general facility and equipment improvements. Additional expansion projects for the Glasgow and Boulder production facilities may be incurred over the next 2 to 3 years as business demand dictates.

            Net cash provided by financing activities was $1.7 million in 2002, $1.9 million for 2001 and $64.9 million in 2000. The financing cash inflows in 2002 were the result of proceeds from long-term debt and the sale of common stock through the exercise of warrant and options offset by the purchase of treasury stock. The financing cash inflows in 2001 were the result of proceeds from the sale of common stock through the exercise of warrant and options offset by the repayment of acquired company debt. The financing cash inflows in 2000 were the result of our initial public offering offset by the repayment of bank debt and our purchase of treasury stock. Our initial public offering and subsequent sales of common stock for the exercise of warrants and options resulted in cash inflow, net of expenses, of approximately $72.7 million. The repayment of debt resulted in cash outflow of approximately $5.2 million and the purchase of treasury stock resulted in cash outflow of approximately $2.7 million.

            As of December 31, 2002, we did not have any significant contractual purchase obligations. We are party to a number of lease agreements mainly for office, research and development and production facilities. Such lease agreements expire at various dates through 2007. At December 31, 2002, the future minimum lease payments required under noncancellable lease provisions are approximately $2.9 million in 2003; $2.6 million in 2004; $2.2 million in 2005; $1.4 million in 2006; and a total of approximately $700,000 in rental payments for the year 2007.

            In March 2003 the Company entered into a loan commitment agreement with a financial institution for up to a $5.0 million secured line of credit. Collateral for the line consists of qualified accounts receivable balances. Funds available under the line are equal to 80% of eligible accounts receivable

    21



    balances. Management expects to finalize the line of credit agreement in the second quarter of 2003. The proposed term of the agreement is 1 year carrying a variable interest rate of 2.25% over prime.

            We expect to devote substantial capital resources to continue our research and development efforts, to expand our marketing and sales and customer support activities, and for other general corporate activities. Our capital requirements for operations depend on a number of factors, including the level of our research and development activities, market acceptance of our products and services, the resources we devote to developing and supporting our products and services, normal capital expenditures and other factors. The restructuring plan developed in 2002 is expected to reduce our operating expenses and thereby reduce the cash needed to fund our operations until such time as we become cash flow positive. Capital expenditures for production expansion projects have been planned in phases. It is our intention to initiate the phased expansions when we have identified specific business opportunities that would require such expansion. We may elect to advance these phases ahead of the business opportunities if we can obtain additional financing on favorable terms.2006. We are currently investigating various financing vehicles for these projects.assessing the final impact of this standard on our financial position, results of operations or cash flows. This assessment includes evaluating option valuation methodologies and assumptions as well as potential changes to compensation strategies.

     In fiscal year 2003, current financial

    On November 24, 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 151, Inventory Costs – an amendment of ARB No. 43. SFAS No. 151 requires idle facility expenses, freight, handling costs, and cash flow projections indicatewasted material (spoilage) costs to be excluded from the cost of inventory and expensed when incurred. It also requires that we expect to use approximately $14.0 million in cash to fund further operating losses and our capital expenditures budgetallocation of approximately $8.4 million. The current capital expenditures budget mainly relatesfixed production overheads to the completioncosts of conversion be based on the normal capacity of the current projects in Boulder and Glasgow duringproduction facilities. SFAS No. 151 will be effective at the first halfbeginning of 2003. We expect to meet this total cash need from existing cash as of December 31, 2002 of $13.3 million, additional cash generated from operations during 2003 and funds available to us under our new $5.0 million credit facility expected to be available during the second quarter of 2003. Current financial and cash flow projections indicate that operating cash is expected to turn positive during the fourth quarter of 2003. These projections may or may not be realized based upon actual operating results and project requirements, thus, during or after this period, if our existing cash and short-term investments, cash generated by operations and available borrowings under credit agreements is insufficient to satisfy our liquidity requirement, we may need to sell additional equity or debt securities, or obtain additional credit arrangements.2006. We are currently pursuing additional financingassessing the final impact of up to $5.0 million beyond the committed linethis standard on our financial position, results of credit. We feel that such additional financing will be secured in 2003. However, we cannot assure you that any financing arrangement will be available in amountsoperations or on terms acceptable to us.cash flows

    Impact of Inflation

     

    We do not believe that price inflation had a material adverse effect on our financial condition or results of operations during the periods presented.

    Recent Account Pronouncements

            Effective January 1, 2002, we adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standard (SFAS) No. 142,Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets. SFAS No. 142 establishes new guidelines for accounting for goodwill and other intangible assets and provides that goodwill and other intangible assets with indefinite lives will not be amortized, but will be evaluated for impairment annually. The provisions of SFAS No. 142 require the completion of a transitional impairment test within six months of adoption, with any impairment treated as a cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle. The Company has performed the transitional goodwill impairment test during the second quarter of 2002 and determined that no impairment exists at the time of adoption of SFAS No. 142. The Company also completed its annual impairment test during the fourth quarter of 2002 and determined that no impairment existed at the time of the annual test.

            In August 2001, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued SFAS No. 143,Accounting For Asset Retirement Obligations. SFAS No. 143 requires the Company to record the fair value of a liability for an asset retirement obligation in the period in which it is incurred and is effective for the Company's

    22



    fiscal year beginning January 1, 2003. Management is in the process of evaluating the impact, if any, this standard will have on the Company's consolidated financial statements.

            In July 2002, the FASB issued SFAS No. 146,Accounting for Costs Associated with Exit or Disposal Activities. SFAS No. 146 addresses the accounting and reporting related to exit or disposal activities and is effective for the Company beginning January 1, 2003. The Company believes the adoption of this standard will not have a significant impact on the financial statements of the Company.

            In November 2002, the FASB issued FASB Interpretation (FIN) No. 45,Guarantor's Accounting and Disclosure Requirements for Guarantees, Including Indirect Guarantees of Indebtedness of Others. FIN No. 45 clarifies that a guarantor is required to recognize, at the inception of a guarantee, a liability for the fair value of the obligation undertaken in issuing certain guarantees. FIN No. 45 also expands the disclosures to be made by a guarantor in its financial statements about its obligations under certain guarantees that it has issued. The recognition provisions are applicable on a prospective basis to guarantees issued or modified after December 31, 2002. Management believes that FIN No. 45 will not have a significant impact on the Company's Consolidated Financial Statements.

    Foreign Currency Rate Fluctuations

     Historically,

    During the last three fiscal years, our international sales have represented approximately 50%50-65% of our net sales. These sales have been to customers in the United States. While we do sellof products in many foreign countries most of these sales are mainly completed by our wholly-ownedin either British Pounds Sterling or the Euro. Additionally, we have two wholly owned subsidiaries, Transgenomic, LTD., orand Cruachem, LTD., and are made in theirwhose operating currency is British pounds sterling, orPounds Sterling and the Euro. Results of operations for the Company'sCompany’s foreign subsidiarysubsidiaries are translated using the average exchange rate during the period. Assets and liabilities are translated at the exchange rate in effect on the balance sheet dates. To further limit our exposure to exchange rate risk all sales quotes issued by Transgenomic, Ltd. are based upon the United States dollar pricing converted at prevailing exchange rates at the time of the quote. Additionally, such quotes will have short expiration dates. As a result although we are subject to exchange rate risk,risk. The operational expenses of our foreign subsidiaries help to reduce the currency exposure we have based on our sales denominated in foreign currencies by converting foreign currencies directly into goods and services. As such management feels we do not have a material exposure to foreign currency rate fluctuations at this time.

    Item 7A.Item 7A.    Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.

            The primary objective of our investment activities is to preserve principal while at the same time maximizing the income we receive from our investments without significantly increasing risk. Some of the securities that we invest in may have market risk. This means that a change in prevailing interest rates may cause the market value of the investment to fluctuate. For example, if we hold a security that was issued with a fixed interest rate at the then-prevailing rate and the prevailing interest rate later rises, the market value of our investment will probably decline. To minimize this risk in the future, we intend to maintain our portfolio of cash equivalents and short-term investments in a variety of securities, including commercial paper, money market funds, government and non-government debt securities. The average duration of all of our investments in 2002 was less than one year. Due to the short-term nature of these investments, we believe we have no material exposure to interest rate risk arising from our investments. Therefore, no quantitative tabular disclosure is presented. We recently committed to a secured line of credit that carriesOur Laurus Loans carry a variable interest rate. This linerate of credit will2% over the prime rate or a minimum of 6%, and therefore, expose us to interest rate riskrisk. Based on the outstanding balance of these loans at December 31, 2004 of $8.50 million, a 1% increase in 2003.the prime rate would increase our interest expense by approximately $0.09 million annually.

    23



    Item 8.Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.

    Item 8.    Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.


    REPORT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT
    REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

    To the Board of Directors
    and Stockholders of

    Transgenomic, Inc.

    Omaha, Nebraska

     

    We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Transgenomic, Inc. and subsidiaries (the Company)“Company”) as of December 31, 20022004 and 20012003, and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders'stockholders’ equity (deficit), and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2002.2004. Our audit also included the financial statement schedule listed in the Index at Item 15. These financial statements and financial statement schedule are the responsibility of the Company'sCompany’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on thesethe financial statements and financial statement schedule based on our audits.

     

    We conducted our audits in accordance with auditingthe standards generally accepted inof the United States of America.Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our audit included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includesstatements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

     

    In our opinion, such consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Transgenomic, Inc. and subsidiaries as ofat December 31, 20022004 and 2001,2003, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 20022004, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Also, in our opinion, such financial statement schedule, when considered in relation to the basic consolidated financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly in all material respects the information set forth therein.

    As discussed in Note A, in 2002O, during the first quarter of 2005, the Company changed its methodobtained an extension of accounting for goodwill and other intangible assets in connection with the adoptionwaiver of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 142,Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets. Also, as discussed in Note Q, onthe borrowing base limit through March 31, 2003, the Company received a commitment letter for a new revolving credit agreement.2006.

    /s/S/    DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

    Deloitte & Touche LLP

    Omaha, Nebraska
    February 4, 2003 (March 31, 2003 as to the second paragraph of Note Q)

    24



    April 14, 2005

    TRANSGENOMIC, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

    CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

    As of December 31, 20022004 and 2001

    2003

    (InDollars in thousands except share and per share data)

     
     2002
     2001
     
    ASSETS 
    CURRENT ASSETS:       
     Cash and cash equivalents $9,735 $19,613 
     Short term investments  3,612  23,913 
     Accounts receivable, net  11,058  11,248 
     Inventories  12,448  5,829 
     Prepaid expenses and other current assets  2,274  2,273 
      
     
     
      Total current assets  39,127  62,876 
    PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT:       
     Land and Buildings  2,020   
     Equipment  16,852  10,459 
     Furniture and fixtures  5,849  3,004 
      
     
     
        24,721  13,463 
     Less—accumulated depreciation  9,069  5,278 
      
     
     
       15,652  8,185 
    DEMONSTRATION INVENTORY  181  250 
    GOODWILL  15,275  14,274 
    OTHER ASSETS  3,800  3,701 
      
     
     
      $74,035 $89,286 
      
     
     

    LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY (DEFICIT)

     

    CURRENT LIABILITIES:

     

     

     

     

     

     

     
     Accounts payable $4,917 $2,664 
     Accrued compensation  1,113  1,212 
     Current portion of long-term debt  63   
     Other accrued expenses  4,928  3,306 
      
     
     
      Total current liabilities  11,021  7,182 
     Long-term debt  1,499   
      
     
     
      Total liabilities  12,520  7,182 

    COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES (Note F)

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

    STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY:

     

     

     

     

     

     

     
     Preferred stock, $.01 par value, 15,000,000 shares authorized, none outstanding     
     Common stock, $.01 par value, 60,000,000 shares authorized, 24,006,649 and 23,867,907 shares issued in 2002 and 2001, respectively  240  239 
     Additional paid-in capital  113,934  113,260 
     Unearned compensation  (78) (158)
     Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)  378  (81)
     Accumulated deficit  (49,771) (28,406)
      
     
     
        64,703  84,854 
     Less: Treasury Stock, at cost, 494,604 and 261,904 shares in 2002 and 2001, respectively  (3,188) (2,750)
      
     
     
      Total stockholders' equity  61,515  82,104 
      
     
     
      $74,035 $89,286 
      
     
     

       2004

      2003

     
    ASSETS         

    CURRENT ASSETS:

             

    Cash and cash equivalents

      $1,002  $1,241 

    Accounts receivable (net of allowances for bad debts of $1,051 and $549)

       10,197   10,877 

    Inventories

       5,366   10,584 

    Prepaid expenses and other current assets

       1,343   1,676 
       


     


    Total current assets

       17,908   24,378 

    PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT:

             

    Land and buildings

       2,427   2,239 

    Equipment

       19,263   20,362 

    Furniture and fixtures

       5,781   9,054 
       


     


        27,471   31,655 

    Less: accumulated depreciation

       13,946   12,951 
       


     


        13,525   18,704 

    GOODWILL

       638   10,503 

    OTHER ASSETS

       5,387   3,721 
       


     


       $37,458  $57,306 
       


     


    LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY         

    CURRENT LIABILITIES:

             

    Accounts payable

      $3,431  $3,580 

    Other accrued expenses

       7,318   3,874 

    Accrued compensation

       636   959 

    Line of credit

       6,514   2,142 

    Current portion of long-term debt

       825   1,693 
       


     


    Total current liabilities

       18,724   12,248 

    Long-term debt

       2,199   —   
       


     


    Total liabilities

       20,923   12,248 

    COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES (Note F)

             

    STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY:

             

    Preferred stock, $.01 par value, 15,000,000 shares authorized, none outstanding

       —     —   

    Common stock, $.01 par value, 60,000,000 shares authorized, 29,330,874 and 28,119,122 shares outstanding in 2004 and 2003, respectively

       299   286 

    Additional paid-in capital

       120,798   115,904 

    Accumulated other comprehensive income

       2,539   1,597 

    Accumulated deficit

       (107,101)  (72,729)
       


     


    Total stockholders’ equity

       16,535   45,058 
       


     


       $37,458  $57,306 
       


     


    See notes to consolidated financial statements.

    25



    TRANSGENOMIC, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

    CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

    Years Ended December 31, 2002, 20012004, 2003 and 2000

    2002

    (Dollars in thousands except share and per share data)

     
     2002
     2001
     2000
     
    NET SALES $37,554 $38,467 $25,883 
    COST OF GOODS SOLD  19,569  17,198  12,800 
      
     
     
     
     Gross profit  17,985  21,269  13,083 
    OPERATING EXPENSES:          
     Selling, General and administrative  24,068  21,497  14,047 
     Research and development  12,201  9,372  7,652 
     Stock based compensation expense  131  139  861 
     Restructuring Charges (Note Q)  3,282     
     Gain on sale of product line      (784)
      
     
     
     
        39,682  31,008  21,776 

    LOSS FROM OPERATIONS

     

     

    (21,697

    )

     

    (9,739

    )

     

    (8,693

    )
    OTHER INCOME (EXPENSE):          
     Interest income  626  2,450  2,005 
     Interest expense  (62) (58) (1,779)
     Other—net  (127) (30) (14)
      
     
     
     
       437  2,362  212 

    LOSS BEFORE INCOME TAXES

     

     

    (21,260

    )

     

    (7,377

    )

     

    (8,481

    )
    INCOME TAX EXPENSE (BENEFIT):          
     Current  105  24   
     Deferred      180 
      
     
     
     
       105  24  180 
      
     
     
     
    NET LOSS $(21,365)$(7,401)$(8,661)
      
     
     
     

    BASIC AND DILUTED LOSS PER SHARE

     

    $

    (0.91

    )

    $

    (0.33

    )

    $

    (0.52

    )

    BASIC AND DILUTED WEIGHTED AVERAGE SHARES OUTSTANDING

     

     

    23,582,687

     

     

    22,560,057

     

     

    16,629,555

     

       2004

      2003

      2002

     

    NET SALES

      $33,789  $33,866  $37,554 

    COST OF GOODS SOLD

       24,596   24,315   19,569 
       


     


     


    Gross profit

       9,193   9,551   17,985 

    OPERATING EXPENSES:

                 

    Selling, general and administrative

       17,499   17,324   24,199 

    Research and development

       6,685   9,305   12,201 

    Restructuring charges (Note N)

       3,570   738   3,282 

    Impairment charges (Note C)

       11,965   4,772   —   

    Gain on sale of facility (Note M)

       (1,466)  —     —   
       


     


     


        38,253   32,139   39,682 

    LOSS FROM OPERATIONS

       (29,060)  (22,588)  (21,697)

    OTHER INCOME (EXPENSE):

                 

    Interest expense

       (2,383)  (315)  (62)

    Loss on debt extinguishment

       (2,859)  —     —   

    Other—net

       (164)  10   499 
       


     


     


        (5,406)  (305)  437 

    LOSS BEFORE INCOME TAXES

       (34,466)  (22,893)  (21,260)

    CURRENT INCOME TAX EXPENSE (BENEFIT)

       (94)  65   105 
       


     


     


    NET LOSS

      $(34,372) $(22,958) $(21,365)
       


     


     


    BASIC AND DILUTED LOSS PER SHARE

      $(1.19) $(0.94) $(0.91)

    BASIC AND DILUTED WEIGHTED AVERAGE SHARES OUTSTANDING

       29,006,241   24,483,861   23,582,687 

    See notes to consolidated financial statements.

    26



    TRANSGENOMIC, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

    CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS'STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY (DEFICIT)

    Years Ended December 31, 2002, 20012004, 2003 and 2000

    2002

    (Dollars in thousands except per share data)

     
     Common Stock
      
      
      
      
      
      
     
     
     Outstanding
    Shares

     Par
    Value

     Additional
    Paid in
    Capital

     Unearned
    Compensation

     Accumulated
    Deficit

     Accumulated Other
    Comprehensive
    Income (Loss)

     Treasury
    Stock

     Total
     
    Balance, January 1, 2000 13,000,000 $130 $10,232 $(113)$(12,344)$(4)$ $(2,099)
     Net loss             (8,661) (8,661)    (8,661)
     Other comprehensive (loss):                        
     Foreign currency translation adjustment                (5)    (5)
     Unrealized gain on available for sale securities                13     13 
                    
           
     Comprehensive loss                (8,653)      
     Sale of common shares 25,000     250              250 
     Initial public offering (net of expenses) 5,152,000  52  69,644              69,696 
     Conversion of Notes Payable and accrued interest 2,750,906  28  13,909              13,937 
     Issuance and exercise of stock options or warrants 544,910  5  3,930  (508)          3,427 
     Amortization of unearned compensation          158           158 
     Purchase of treasury stock (261,904)                (2,750) (2,750)
      
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
    Balance, December 31, 2000 21,210,912  215  97,965  (463) (21,005) 4  (2,750) 73,966 
     Net loss             (7,401) (7,401)    (7,401)
     Other comprehensive income (loss):                        
     Foreign currency translation adjustment                (107)    (107)
     Unrealized gain on available for sale securities                22     22 
                    
           
     Comprehensive loss                (7,486)      
     Issuance of shares for acquisition 1,889,523  19  13,065              13,084 
     Issuance and exercise of stock options or warrants 505,568  5  2,396              2,401 
     Deferred compensation       (166) 204           38 
     Amortization of unearned compensation          101           101 
      
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
    Balance, December 31, 2001 23,606,003  239  113,260  (158) (28,406) (81) (2,750) 82,104 
     Net loss             (21,365) (21,365)    (21,365)
     Other comprehensive income (loss):                        
     Foreign currency translation adjustment                493     493 
     Unrealized gain on available for sale securities                (34)    (34)
                    
           
     Comprehensive loss                (20,906)      
     Issuance and exercise of stock options or warrants 81,900  1  460  (51)          410 
     Issuance of shares for employee stock purchase plan 56,842     214              214 
     Amortization of unearned compensation          131           131 
     Purchase of treasury stock (232,700)                (438) (438)
      
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
    Balance, December 31, 2002 23,512,045 $240 $113,934 $(78)$(49,771)$378 $(3,188)$61,515 
      
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     

       Common Stock

      Additional
    Paid in
    Capital


      Unearned
    Compensation


      

    Accumulated

    Deficit


      

    Accumulated
    Other

    Comprehensive

    Income (Loss)


      

    Treasury

    Stock


      Total

     
       

    Outstanding

    Shares


      Par
    Value


            

    Balance, January 1, 2002

      23,606,003  $239  $113,260  $(158) $(28,406) $(81) $(2,750) $82,104 

    Net loss

      —     —     —     —     (21,365)  (21,365)  —     (21,365)

    Other comprehensive income (loss):

                                    

    Foreign currency translation adjustment

      —     —     —     —     —     493   —     493 

    Unrealized gain on available for sale securities

      —     —     —     —     —     (34)  —     (34)
                          


            

    Comprehensive loss

      —     —     —     —     —     (20,906)  —       

    Issuance and exercise of stock options or warrants

      81,900   1   460   (51)          —     410 

    Issuance of shares for employee stock purchase plan

      56,842   —     214   —     —     —     —     214 

    Deferred compensation

      —     —     —     131   —     —     —     131 

    Purchase of treasury stock

      (232,700)  —     —     —     —     —     (438)  (438)
       

     

      

      


     


     


     


     


    Balance, December 31, 2002

      23,512,045   240   113,934   (78)  (49,771)  378   (3,188)  61,515 

    Net loss

      —     —     —         (22,958)  (22,958)  —     (22,958)

    Other comprehensive income (loss):

                              —       

    Foreign currency translation adjustment

      —     —     —     —     —     1,219   —     1,219 
                          


            

    Comprehensive loss

      —     —     —     —     —     (21,739)  —       

    Issuance of stock options and warrants

      —     —     386   —     —     —     —     386 

    Beneficial Conversion Premium

      —     —     480   —     —     —     —     480 

    Issuance of shares

      4,500,000   45   969   —     —     —     3,188   4,202 

    Issuance of shares for employee stock purchase plan

      107,077   1   135   —     —     —     —     136 

    Amortization of unearned compensation

                  78   —     —     —     78 
       

     

      

      


     


     


     


     


    Balance, December 31, 2003

      28,119,122   286   115,904   —     (72,729)  1,597   —     45,058 
       

     

      

      


     


     


     


     


    Net loss

      —     —     —     —     (34,372)  (34,372)      (34,372)

    Other comprehensive income (loss):

                                    

    Foreign currency translation adjustment

      —     —     —     —     —     942   —     942 
                          


            

    Comprehensive loss

      —     —     —     —     —     (33,430)  —       

    Issuance of stock options and warrants

      —     —     189   —     —     —     —     189 

    Beneficial Conversion Premium

      —     —     2,420   —     —     —     —     2,420 

    Issuance of shares

      1,134,850   12   2,198   —     —     —     —     2,210 

    Issuance of shares for employee stock purchase plan

      76,902   1   87   —     —     —     —     88 
       

     

      

      


     


     


     


     


    Balance, December 31, 2004

      29,330,874  $299  $120,798  $—    $(107,101) $2,539  $—    $16,535 
       

     

      

      


     


     


     


     


    See notes to consolidated financial statements.

    27



    TRANSGENOMIC, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

    CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

    Years Ended December 31, 2002, 20012004, 2003 and 2000

    (In thousands)
    2002

     
     2002
     2001
     2000
     
    CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:          
     Net loss $(21,365)$(7,401)$(8,661)
     Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash flows from operating activities:          
      Depreciation and amortization  3,993  3,680  1,807 
      Non-cash restructuring charges  1,698     
      Gain on sale of product line      (784)
      Accrued interest and redemption premium      1,415 
      Other  131  130  1,146 
     Changes in operating assets and liabilities, net of acquisitions:          
      Accounts receivable  794  (4,677) 1,444 
      Inventories  (5,767) (1,910) (223)
      Prepaid expenses and other current assets  527  (1,169) (357)
      Accounts payable  2,249  (378) (796)
      Accrued expenses  (204) 608  261 
      
     
     
     
      Net cash flows from operating activities  (17,944) (11,117) (4,748)
    CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:          
     Purchase of property and equipment  (11,468) (5,706) (3,109)
     Proceeds from asset sales    15  5,657 
     Increase in other assets  (2,871) (1,351) (980)
     Proceeds from the maturities and sale of available for sale securities  39,355  52,739   
     Purchases of available for sale securities  (19,088) (52,902) (23,728)
     Purchase of business, net of cash acquired    (2,189)  
      
     
     
     
      Net cash flows from investing activities  5,928  (9,394) (22,160)
    CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:          
     Issuance of common stock, net of expenses  624  2,401  72,670 
     Purchase of treasury stock  (438)   (2,750)
     Proceeds from long-term debt  1,559    204 
     Net change in note payable—bank      (4,340)
     Payments on long-term debt      (901)
     Repayment of acquired business debt    (458)  
      
     
     
     
      Net cash flows from financing activities  1,745  1,943  64,883 
    EFFECT OF FOREIGN CURRENCY EXCHANGE RATE CHANGES ON CASH  393  (12) 65 
      
     
     
     
    NET CHANGE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS  (9,878) (18,580) 38,040 
    CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT BEGINNING OF YEAR  19,613  38,193  153 
      
     
     
     
    CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT END OF YEAR $9,735 $19,613 $38,193 
      
     
     
     

    (Dollars in thousands except per share data)

       2004

      2003

      2002

     

    CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:

                 

    Net loss

      $(34,372) $(22,958) $(21,365)

    Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash flows from operating activities:

                 

    Depreciation and amortization

       4,009   3,981   3,993 

    Non-cash restructuring charges (Note N)

       2,027   364   1,698 

    Impairment charges (Note C)

       11,965   4,772   —   

    Gain on sale of facility (Note M)

       (1,466)  —     —   

    Non-cash financing costs

       1,642   —     —   

    Loss on debt extinguishment

       2,859   —     —   

    (Gain)/Loss on sale of securities

       128   (64)  —   

    Other

       18   93   131 

    Changes in operating assets and liabilities, net of acquisitions:

                 

    Trading securities acquired in settlement of accounts receivable

       (4,397)  (1,843)  —   

    Proceeds from sale of trading securities

       4,269   1,907   —   

    Accounts receivable

       1,063   619   794 

    Inventories

       2,611   2,887   (5,767)

    Prepaid expenses and other current assets

       (130)  334   527 

    Accounts payable

       (268)  (1,509)  2,249 

    Accrued expenses

       941   (1,828)  (204)
       


     


     


    Net cash flows from operating activities

       (9,101)  (13,245)  (17,944)

    CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:

                 

    Proceeds from the maturities and sale of available for sale securities

       —     3,612   39,355 

    Purchases of available for sale securities

       —     —     (19,088)

    Purchase of property and equipment

       (1,758)  (6,413)  (11,468)

    Change in other assets

       1,138   73   (2,871)

    Proceeds from sale of specialty oligonuceotide manufacturing facility (Note M)

       3,000   —     —   

    Proceeds from asset sales

       —     9   —   
       


     


     


    Net cash flows from investing activities

       2,380   (2,719)  5,928 

    CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:

                 

    Net change in line of credit

       4,956   2,992   —   

    Proceeds from long-term debt

       2,750   —     1,559 

    Payments on long-term debt

       (1,779)  (35)  —   

    Issuance of common stock, net of expenses

       71   4,338   624 

    Purchase of treasury stock

       —     —     (438)
       


     


     


    Net cash flows from financing activities

       5,998   7,295   1,745 

    EFFECT OF FOREIGN CURRENCY EXCHANGE RATE CHANGES ON CASH

       484   175   393 
       


     


     


    NET CHANGE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS

       (239)  (8,494)  (9,878)

    CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT BEGINNING OF YEAR

       1,241   9,735   19,613 
       


     


     


    CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT END OF YEAR

      $1,002  $1,241  $9,735 
       


     


     


    SUPPLEMENTAL CASH FLOW INFORMATION

                 

    Cash paid during the year for:

                 

    Interest

      $560  $314  $30 

    Income taxes, net

       (94)  70   120 

    Non-cash transactions:

                 

    Conversions of debt to equity

       2,226   —     —   

    See notes to consolidated financial statements.

    28



    TRANSGENOMIC, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

    NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

    Years Ended December 31, 2002, 20012004, 2003 and 2000

    2002

    (Tabular amountsDollars in thousands except share and per share data)

    A.A.    SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

    Business Description.

     

    Transgenomic, Inc., a Delaware corporation, and its subsidiaries (the "Company"“Company”) provide innovative products and services for the synthesis, purification and analysis of nucleic acids. The Company'sCompany’s products and services include automated instrument systems, associated consumables, nucleic acid chemical building blocks, nucleic acid synthesis products, novel chemistry development for nucleic acids, process development services and genetic variation discovery services. The Company develops, assembles, manufactures and markets it'sits products and services to the life sciences industry to be used in research focused on molecular genetics of humans and other organisms. Such research could lead to development of new diagnostics and therapeutics. The Company'sCompany’s business plan is to participate in the value chain associated with these activities by providing key technology, tools, consumables, biochemical reagents and services to those entities engaged in basic biomedical research and the development of diagnostics and therapeutic agents.

     Prior to 2002 the

    The Company was managed and operated on a fully integrated basis in one operating segment. During 2002, management determined it was appropriate to evaluate the Company's operations based upon the nature of the products and services provided. Accordingly, the Company has determined that it operates in two reportable segments, BioSystems and Nucleic Acids. The BioSystems operating segment generates revenue from the sale of automated instrument systems and associated consumable products and services. The Nucleic Acids operating segment generates revenue from the sale of nucleic acid-based products and services.

     

    The Company markets and sells these products primarily through a direct sales and support group in North America and Europe and through a network of distributors in the Pacific Rim and other international markets. These sales efforts are directed from the Company headquarters in Omaha, Nebraska and through a series of sales and support offices strategically located throughout the United States, Europe and Japan.

    Principles of Consolidation.

     

    The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Transgenomic, Inc. and its wholly-owned subsidiaries. All intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.

    Cash and Cash Equivalents.

     

    For purposes of reporting cash flows, cash and cash equivalents include cash and temporary investments with original maturities at acquisition of three months or less.

    Short Term Investments.

     

    The Company classifies all of its short-term investments with maturities at acquisition of greater than three months as available for sale securities. Such short termshort-term investments consist primarily of United States government and federal agency securities, corporate commercial paper and corporate debt whichthat are stated at market value, with unrealized gains and losses on such securities reflected, net of tax, as other comprehensive income in stockholders'stockholders’ equity. Realized gains and losses on short term investments are

    29



    included in earnings and are derived using the specific identification method for determining the cost of securities. It is the Company'sCompany’s intent to maintain a liquid portfolio to take advantage of investment opportunities; therefore, all securities are considered to be available for sale and are classified as current assets.

    During 2003 and 2004, the Company accepted common stock from one of its customers (Geron Corporation) as payment for goods and services. These shares were classified as available-for-sale securities. Net losses on these securities of $128 during 2004 and net gains of $64 during 2003 were reflected as other expense on the consolidated statement of operations. Proceeds from the sales of these securities were reflected as cash flows from operating activities.

    TRANSGENOMIC, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

    NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

    Years Ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002

    (Dollars in thousands except per share data)

    Accounts Receivable.

     

    Accounts receivable are shown net of allowance for doubtful accounts. The following is a summary of activity for the allowance for doubtful accounts during each of $450,000 and $213,000 in 2002 and 2001, respectively. Paymentthe three years ended December 31, 2004:

       Beginning
    Balance


      Additional
    Charges
    to Income


      Deductions
    from
    Reserve


      Ending
    Balance


    Year Ended December 31, 2004

      $549  $534  $32  $1,051

    Year Ended December 31, 2003

      $450  $174  $75  $549

    Year Ended December 31, 2002

      $213  $418  $181  $450

    While payment terms are generally are 30 or 60 days. Thedays, the Company has also provided extended payment terms of up to 90 days to some of its customers.in certain cases.

    Inventories.

     

    Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market. Cost is computed using standard costs for finished goods and average or latest actual cost for raw materials and work in process.

    Property and Equipment.

     

    Property and equipment are carried at cost. Depreciation and amortization areis computed by the straight-line and accelerated methodsmethod over the estimated useful lives of the related assets as follows:

    Buildings

      15 years

    Leasehold improvements

    3 to 7 years

    Furniture and fixtures

      5 to 7 years

    Production equipment

      5 to 7 years

    Computer equipment

      3 to 5 years

    Research and development equipment

      3 to 5 years

    Demonstration equipment

      3 to 5 years

    Depreciation of property and equipment totaled $4,009, $3,983 and $3,993 in 2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively.

    Goodwill.Goodwill and other Intangible Assets

            Effective January 1, 2002, theThe Company adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standard (SFAS)Standards (“SFAS”) No. 142,Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets,.beginning on January 1, 2002. SFAS No. 142 establishes new guidelines for accounting for goodwill and other intangible assets and provides that goodwill and other intangible assets with indefinite lives will not be amortized, but will be evaluatedtested for impairment annually. The provisions of SFAS No. 142 requireImpairment occurs when the completion of a transitional impairment test within six months of adoption, with any impairment treated as a cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle. The Company has performed the transitional goodwill impairment test during the second quarter of 2002 and determined that no impairment exists at the time of adoption of SFAS No. 142. The Company also completed its annual impairment test during the fourth quarter of 2002 and determined that no impairment existed at the timefair value of the annual test.

    Impairment of Long-Lived Assets.

            The Company assessesasset is less than its carrying amount. If impaired, the recoverability of long-lived assets held for use, including certainasset’s carrying value is reduced to its fair value. Identifiable intangible assets with definite lives are amortized over their estimated useful lives and goodwill, whenevertested for impairment as events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an

    30



    the asset may be impaired. Impairment occurs when the carrying value is not be recoverable. In such cases, ifrecoverable and the sum of the expected cash flows (undiscounted and without interest) resulting from the usefair value of the asset is less than the carrying amount, an impairmentvalue.

    The Company has not amortized goodwill for any period presented. Accordingly, there are no differences between reported net loss is recognized based on the difference between the carrying amount and the fair value of the assets.loss per share related to goodwill amortization.

    Other Assets.

     

    Other assets include long-term inventory, patents, intellectual property, goodwilldeferred financing costs and capitalized software development costs. The Company capitalizes the external and in-house legal costs and filing fees associated with obtaining patents on its new discoveries and amortizes these costs using the straight-line method over the shorter of the legal life of the patent or its economic life, generally 17 years, beginning on the date the patent is issued. Intellectual property, which is purchased technology, is recorded at cost and is amortized over its estimated useful life of between 5 and 10 years.

    Software Development Costs.

    The Company capitalizescapitalized software development costs for products offered for sale in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting StandardSFAS No. 86,Accounting for the Costs of Computer Software to be Sold, Leased or Otherwise Marketed. This Standard allows for the capitalization of certain development costs once a software product has reached technological feasibility. CapitalizedDevelopment costs are includedcapitalized totaled $0 in Other Assets, net of amortization. Such capitalized costs are amortized over the estimated useful life of the software product, generally 3 to 5 years, beginning when a product is released for sale.2004 and 2003 and $1,127 in 2002.

    TRANSGENOMIC, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

            The Company capitalizes internal use software development costs in accordance with Statement of Position No. 98-1,NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

    Accounting for the Costs of Computer Software Developed or Obtained for Internal Use. Capitalized internal use software development costs are amortized on an accelerated basis over three years. For the years endedYears Ended December 31, 20022004, 2003 and 2001, capitalized internal software costs included2002

    (Dollars in property, plant and equipment, net of accumulated amortization, totaled $461,000 and $1,000,000, respectively.thousands except per share data)

    Stock Based Compensation.

    The Company accounts for its employee stock option grants under the provisions of Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25,Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees, which utilizes the intrinsic value method. Accordingly, compensation cost for stock options is measured as the excess, if any, of the deemed fair market value of the Company'sCompany’s common stock at the date of grant over the stock option exercise price. Stock option grants to nonemployeesnon-employees are accounted for using the fair value method of accounting in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS)SFAS No. 123,Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation, using the Black-Scholes model.

    31



    The following table illustrates the effect on net loss and loss per share if the Company had applied the fair value recognition provisions of SFAS No. 123Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation, to stock based employee compensation.

     
     2002
     2001
     2000
     
    Net Loss:          
     As reported $(21,365)$(7,401)$(8,661)
     Pro forma  (23,274) (10,110) (10,205)
    Basic and diluted loss per share:          
     As reported  (0.91) (0.33) (0.52)
     Pro forma  (0.99) (0.45) (0.61)

    Unearned Compensation.

     Unearned compensation represents the unamortized difference between the option exercise price and the deemed fair market value of the Company's common stock at the option grant date, for options issued under the Company's Stock Option Plan (Note I). The unearned compensation is charged to operations over the vesting period of the respective options.

       2004

      2003

      2002

     

    Net Loss:

                 

    As reported

      $(34,372) $(22,958) $(21,365)

    Pro forma

      $(35,432) $(24,794) $(23,274)

    Basic and diluted loss per share:

                 

    As reported

       (1.19)  (0.94)  (0.91)

    Pro forma

       (1.22)  (1.01)  (0.99)

    Income Taxes.

     

    Deferred tax assets and liabilities are determined based on the differences between the financial reporting and tax basis of assets and liabilities at each balance sheet date using tax rates expected to be in effect in the year the differences are expected to reverse. Deferred tax assets are reduced by a valuation allowance to the extent that it is unlikely they will be realized.

    Revenue Recognition.

     

    Revenue on the sales of products is recognized in accordance with the terms of the sales arrangement. Such recognition is based on receipt of an unconditional customer order and transfer of title and risk of ownership to the customer, typically upon shipment of the product. Our sales terms do not provide for the right of return unless the product is damaged or defective. Revenues from certain services associated with our analytical instruments, to be performed subsequent to shipment of the products, is deferred and recognized when the services are provided. Such services, mainly limited to installation and training services that are not essential to the functionality of the instruments, typically are performed in a timely manner subsequent to shipment of the instrument. The Company also enters into various service contracts that cover installed WAVE systems. These contracts cover specific time periods and revenue associated with these contracts is deferred and recognized over the service period. At December 31, 20022004 and 20012003, deferred revenue, mainly associated with ourthe Company’s service contracts, included on the Company'sCompany’s balance sheet was approximately $1.2 million.$1,478 and $1,792 respectively.

    32



    Research and Development.

     

    Research and development costs are charged to expense when incurred with the exception of certain software development costs that are capitalized.incurred.

    Translation of Foreign Currency.

     

    Financial statements of subsidiaries outside the U.S. are measured using the local currency as the functional currency. The adjustments to translate those amounts into U.S. dollars are accumulated in a separate account in stockholders'stockholders’ equity and are included in other comprehensive income. Foreign currency transaction gains or losses resulting from changes in currency exchange rates are included in the determination of net income. Foreign currency transaction adjustments decreased net loss approximately $1.0 million$328 in 2002. Foreign currency transaction adjustments2004 and $1,089 in 20012003 and 2000 were not significant.2002.

    Comprehensive Income.

     Comprehensive

    Accumulated other comprehensive income forat December 31, 2004 and 2003 consisted of foreign currency translation adjustments, net of applicable tax of $0. For all previous periods presented, accumulated other comprehensive income consists of net income, foreign currency translation adjustments and unrealized gains or losses on available for sale investments.investments, net of applicable

    TRANSGENOMIC, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

    NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

    Years Ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002

    (Dollars in thousands except per share data)

    tax of $0. The Company deems its foreign investments to be permanent in nature and does not provide for taxes on currency translation adjustments arising from converting its investments in a foreign currency to U.S. dollars. There were no reclassification adjustments to be reported in the periods presented.

    Fair Value of Financial Instruments.

     

    The carrying amount of the Company'sCompany’s cash and cash equivalents, receivables, accounts payable and accrued expenses approximate fair value because of the short maturity of those instruments. The Company derives the fair value of its short-term investments based on quoted market prices. The carrying value of long-term debt and the line of credit approximates fair value based upon existing interest rates available to the Company for similar debt.

    Earnings Per Share.

     

    Basic earnings per share are calculated based on the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding during each period. Diluted earnings per share include shares issuable upon exercise of outstanding stock options and warrants or conversion of convertible notes, where dilutive. Potentially dilutive securities totaling 13,484,072, 7,671,771 and 5,158,672 in 2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively, have been excluded from the computation of diluted earnings per share as they have an antidilutive effect due to the Company'sCompany’s net loss.

    Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements.Pronouncements

            In August 2001,

    On December 16, 2004, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued SFAS No. 143,Accounting For Asset Retirement Obligations.123R, Share-Based Payment. SFAS No. 143 requires123R addresses the Company to recordaccounting for share-based payment transactions in which an enterprise receives employee services in exchange for (a) equity instruments of the enterprise or (b) liabilities that are based on the fair value of the enterprise’s equity instruments or that may be settled by the issuance of such equity instruments. SFAS No. 123R eliminates the ability to account for share-based compensation transactions using Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25 and generally requires that such transactions be accounted for using a liability for an asset retirement obligation in the period in which it is incurred and is effective for the Company's fiscal year beginningfair-value-based method. The Company expects to adopt this standard on January 1, 2003. Management2006. The Company is incurrently assessing the processfinal impact of evaluating the impact, if any, this standard will have on the Company's consolidatedits financial statements.position, results of operations or cash flows. This assessment includes evaluating option valuation methodologies and assumptions as well as potential changes to compensation strategies.

    33



            In July 2002,On November 24, 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 146, "Accounting for151, Inventory Costs Associated with Exit or Disposal Activities".– an amendment of ARB No. 43. SFAS No. 146 addresses151 requires idle facility expenses, freight, handling costs, and wasted material (spoilage) costs to be excluded from the accountingcost of inventory and reporting relatedexpensed when incurred. It also requires that allocation of fixed production overheads to exit or disposal activities and isthe costs of conversion be based on the normal capacity of the production facilities. SFAS No. 151 will be effective forat the Company beginning January 1, 2003.of 2006. The Company believesis currently assessing the adoptionfinal impact of this standard will not have a significant impact on the financial statements of the Company.

            In November 2002, the FASB issued FASB Interpretation (FIN) No. 45,Guarantor's Accounting and Disclosure Requirements for Guarantees, Including Indirect Guarantees of Indebtedness of Others. FIN No. 45 clarifies that a guarantor is required to recognize, at the inception of a guarantee, a liability for the fair value of the obligation undertaken in issuing certain guarantees. FIN No. 45 also expands the disclosures to be made by a guarantor in its financial statements about its obligations under certain guarantees that it has issued. The recognition provisions are applicable on a prospective basis to guarantees issuedposition, results of operations or modified after December 31, 2002. Management believes that FIN No. 45 will not have a significant impact on the Company's Consolidated Financial Statements.cash flows.

    Use of Estimates.

     

    The preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

    Reclassifications.

     

    Certain reclassifications may have been made to the 2000 and 2001prior period financial statements to conform to the 2002current year presentation.

    B.    SHORT TERM INVESTMENTSTRANSGENOMIC, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

     The amortized cost of available-for-sale securities and their approximate fair values were as follows:

     
     Amortized
    Cost

     Gross Unrealized
    Gains

     Gross Unrealized
    Losses

     Fair
    Value

    December 31, 2002            
    Corporate Debt $3,611 $1 $ $3,612
      
     
     
     
    Total securities available-for-sale $3,611 $1 $ $3,612
      
     
     
     
    December 31, 2001            
    Commercial Paper $8,782 $10 $ $8,792
    U.S. Government Agencies  5,774      5,774
    Corporate Debt  9,322  25    9,347
      
     
     
     
    Total securities available-for-sale $23,878 $35 $ $23,913
      
     
     
     

            Maturities of short-term investments are due within one year.

    34



    C.    INVENTORIESNOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

     

    Years Ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002

    (Dollars in thousands except per share data)

    B.INVENTORIES

    Inventories consisted of the following at December 31:

       Biosystems Operating
    Segment


      Nucleic Acids Operating
    Segment


      Total

       2004

      2003

      2004

      2003

      2004

      2003

    Finished goods

      $2,637  $2,875  $2,380  $2,247  $5,017  $5,122

    Raw materials and work in process

       780   1,223   2,275   3,851   3,055   5,074

    Demonstration inventory

       153   388         153   388
       

      

      

      

      

      

        3,570   4,486   4,655   6,098   8,225   10,584

    Less inventory classified as a long-term asset

       —     —     2,859   —     2,859   —  
       

      

      

      

      

      

    Net Inventory

      $3,570  $4,486  $1,796  $6,098  $5,366  $10,584
       

      

      

      

      

      

    The Nucleic Acids operating segment inventory at December 31, 2004 and 2003 consisted primarily of phosphoramadites and the raw materials to produce phosphoramadites which are used and produced at the Company’s facility in Glasgow, Scotland. As of December 31, 2004, the Company has classified a portion of this inventory as a long-term other asset based on its existing sales forecasts for these products.

    The Company periodically evaluates its inventory of chemical building blocks to determine whether they continue to meet quality and other specifications and over what time period such products are expected to be sold. Product that does not meet quality and other specifications can generally be re-worked to enhance purity. Costs to purify such product and related yield losses are expensed as incurred.

    C.GOODWILL

    At December 31, 20022004 and 2001, inventories2003, goodwill by operating segment consist of the following:

     
     2002
     2001
     
    Finished goods $6,400 $2,335 
    Raw materials and work in process  5,904  3,248 
    Demonstration inventory  325  496 
      
     
     
       12,629  6,079 
    Less long-term demonstration inventory  (181) (250)
      
     
     
      $12,448 $5,829 
      
     
     

       Biosystems
    Operating
    Segment


      Nucleic Acids
    Operating
    Segment


      Total

     

    Net balance December 31, 2002

      $638  $14,637  $15,275 

    Goodwill impairment charge

       —     (4,772)  (4,772)
       

      


     


    Net balance December 31, 2003

       638   9,865   10,503 

    Goodwill impairment charge

       —     (9,865)  (9,865)
       

      


     


    Net Balance December 31, 2004

      $638  $0  $638 
       

      


     


    The Company recorded charges of $9,865 and $4,772 during 2004 and 2003, respectively, related to the impairment of goodwill associated with the Nucleic Acids operating segment. In each case, the amount of the impairment charge was based, in part, on independent valuations performed by the same unaffiliated valuation firm. The 2003 charge resulted from the Company’s annual impairment test that was performed in the fourth quarter of 2003. The 2004 charge resulted from an interim period impairment test performed during the second quarter of 2004.

    The interim period impairment test became necessary after the Company’s Board of Directors directed management during the second quarter of 2004 to explore strategic alternatives for the Nucleic Acids operating segment. This process included significant due diligence by management, third-party advisors and prospective independent buyers and other interested parties. Information obtained through this process indicated that it was more likely than not that the assets associated with the Nucleic Acids operating segment were impaired.

    The Company also recorded a charge of $2,100 during the second quarter of 2004 related to the impairment of property and equipment associated with the Nucleic Acids operating segment.

    D.    OTHER ASSETSTRANSGENOMIC, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

     

    NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

    Years Ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002

    (Dollars in thousands except per share data)

    D.OTHER ASSETS

    At December 31, 20022004 and 2001,2003, finite lived intangible assets and other assets consistconsisted of the following:

     
     2002
     2001
     
     Cost
     Accumulated
    Reserve

     Net Book
    Value

     Cost
     Accumulated
    Reserve

     Net Book
    Value

    Capitalized software $2,132 $24 $2,108 $728 $ $728
    Intellectual property  545  90  455  275  38  237
    Patents  883  150  733  1,514  78  1,436
    Other  504    504  1,545  245  1,300
      
     
     
     
     
     
    Total $4,064 $264 $3,800 $4,062 $361 $3,701
      
     
     
     
     
     

     

       2004

      2003

       Cost

      Accumulated
    Reserve


      Net Book
    Value


      Cost

      Accumulated
    Reserve


      Net Book
    Value


    Capitalized software

      $2,132  $1,468  $664  $2,132  $758  $1,374

    Intellectual property

       765   476   289   765   165   600

    Patents

       1,071   194   877   1,035   170   865

    Deferred Financing Costs

       576   183   393   409   —     409

    Long Term Inventory

       4,797   1,938   2,859   —     —     —  

    Other

       452   147   305   656   183   473
       

      

      

      

      

      

    Total

      $9,793  $4,406  $5,387  $4,997  $1,276  $3,721
       

      

      

      

      

      

    Amortization expense for intangible assets was $150,000$1,197, $825 and $150 during 2002. The Company expects amortization2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively. Amortization expense for intangible assets is expected to be approximately $900,000$1,009 in fiscal 2003, $900,0002005, $342 in fiscal 2004, $850,0002006, $320 in fiscal 2005,2007, $62 in 2008 and $200,000$130 in fiscal 2006 and 2007.

    E.    GOODWILL2009.

     At December 31, 2002 and 2001, goodwill by operating segment

    E.DEBT

    Debt consisted of the following:following at December 31:

     
     Biosystems
    operating
    segment

     Nucleic Acids
    operating
    segment

     Total
    Net balance December 31, 2001 $638 $13,636 $14,274
    Finalization of purchase price allocations    1,001  1,001
      
     
     
    Net balance December 31, 2002 $638 $14,637 $15,275
      
     
     

     Annual testing

       2004

      2003

     

    Credit Line

             

    Gross amount due (2% above prime, due December 2006)

      $5,948  $2,992 

    Debt premium

       1,004   —   

    Debt discount - warrants

       (85)  (370)

    Debt discount - beneficial conversion premium

       (353)  (480)
       


     


       $6,514  $2,142 
       


     


    Long-Term Debt

             

    Convertible debt (2% above prime, due February 2007)

      $2,550  $—   

    Debt Premium

       474   —   

    Mortgage debt

       —     1,693 

    Less current portion

       (825)  (1,693)
       


     


       $2,199  $—   
       


     


    In December 2003, the Company entered into a $7,500 line of goodwill for impairment was completed incredit (the “Credit Line”) with Laurus Master Fund, Ltd. (“Laurus”). The term of the fourth quarter, afterCredit Line is three years carrying an interest rate of 2.0% over the annual forecasting process.prime rate or a minimum of 6.0% (7.25% at December 31, 2004). Funds available under the Credit Line are determined by a borrowing base equal to 90% of eligible accounts receivable balances plus up to $1,000 related to inventory balances. The Credit Line is secured by most of the Company’s assets. Prior to amendments to the Credit Line discussed below, payment of interest and principal could, under certain circumstances, be made with shares of the Company’s common stock at a fixed conversion price of $2.20 per share. Conversion of this debt to common stock may be made at the election of Laurus or the Company. The Company has determined that no impairment existedcould elect to convert only if its shares trade at a price exceeding $2.42 per share for ten consecutive trading days, and such conversion is further subject to trading volume limitations and a limitation on the timetotal beneficial ownership by Laurus of the annual test.Company’s common stock. Upon entering into the Credit Line, the Company issued warrants to Laurus to acquire 550,000 shares of the Company’s common stock at an exercise price exceeding the average trading price of the Company’s common stock over the ten trading days prior to the date of the warrant.

    In February 2004, the Company entered into a separate $2,750 convertible note with Laurus (the “Term Note”). The Term Note carries an interest rate of 2.0% over the prime rate or a minimum of 6.0% (7.25% at December 31, 2004) and has a term of 3 years. Prior to amendments to the Term Note discussed below, the principal and interest on the Term Note could be converted into common stock of the Company at a fixed conversion price of $2.61 per share. Upon entering the Term Note, the Company issued warrants to Laurus to acquire 125,000 shares of its common stock. Borrowings under the Term Note were primarily used to retire the mortgage debt on the Company’s Glasgow facility. Remaining borrowings of approximately $750 were used to complete the build-out of the Glasgow facility, complete the consolidation the Company’s Glasgow operations into the new facility and provide funds for operations.

    Certain features of the Credit Line and Term Note (collectively, the “Laurus Loans”) require the Company to separately account for the value of certain amounts related to the warrants issued and the conversion feature of the Laurus Loans. Specifically, Emerging

    TRANSGENOMIC, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

    NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

    Years Ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002

    (Dollars in thousands except per share data)

    Issues Task Force (“EITF”) No. 00-27,Application of Issue No. 98-5 to Certain Convertible Instruments, requires the Company to separately value the warrants issued and the “beneficial conversion premium” related to the Laurus Loans. Any borrowings under the Credit Line may result in additional beneficial conversion premiums. The values of the warrants and the beneficial conversion premium have been recorded on the balance sheet as a debt discount and an increase to additional paid in capital. The debt discount recorded for these items will be amortized as expense to the income statement over the terms of the Laurus Loans or as the warrants are exercised or the debt is converted into common stock thereby increasing the effective interest rate on the Laurus Loans. In January and February 2004, Laurus exercised its conversion rights on the Credit Line and converted $2,000 of amounts outstanding on the Credit Line into approximately 910,000 shares of common stock of the Company. In connection with this conversion, the Company accelerated the amortization of approximately $480 of the beneficial conversion premium.

    In February 2004, Laurus waived the borrowing base limitation on the Credit Line, thereby making the full $7,500 facility available to the Company regardless of the available collateral. On August 31, 2004, Laurus agreed to extend the borrowing base waiver on the Credit Line through March 19, 2005. In addition, Laurus deferred certain payments due under the Term Note and reduced the interest rate on both of the Laurus Loans to 0% for any day the closing sale price of the Company’s common stock is at or above $1.75 per share. In return, the Company lowered the conversion price on each of the Laurus Loans to $1.00 per share and issued a warrant to Laurus covering an additional 400,000 common shares at an exercise price of $1.25 per share. The closing price of the Company’s common stock on August 31, 2004 was $1.20 per share.

    The August 31, 2004 Laurus modifications were treated as extinguishments for financial reporting purposes since the change in present value of expected cash flows between the original and modified agreements is greater than 10%. As such, the Company recorded a loss on extinguishment of debt of $2,859 at August 31, 2004 reflecting the difference between (i) the recorded amount of debt, net of related discounts, of $7,427 and (ii) the fair value of operating segments was estimated usingthe new debt instrument of $10,287 plus the fair value of the new warrants of $111. The difference between the fair value of the new debt of $10,287 and the face value of the debt of $8,572 represents a discounted cash flow model.premium, which will be reflected as a reduction of interest expense over the life of the new debt.

    35



            A reconciliation of previously reported net loss and loss per shareProspectively, draws on the Credit Line may result in beneficial conversion charges to the amounts adjusted forextent the exclusionprice of goodwill amortization follows:

     
     Fiscal Years Ended December 31,
     
     
     2002
     2001
     2000
     
    Reported Net Loss $(21,365)$(7,401)$(8,661)
    ADD: Goodwill Amortization    889  127 
      
     
     
     
    Adjusted Net Loss $(21,365)$(6,512)$(8,534)
      
     
     
     

    Loss Per Share:

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     
    As Reported $(0.91)$(0.33)$(0.52)
    Adjusted $(0.91)$(0.29)$(0.51)

    F.    COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIESthe Company’s common stock exceeds the conversion price on the day of the draw. Such beneficial charges will be amortized as expense to the income statement during the period the draw remains outstanding or up to the point the debt is converted into common stock thereby increasing the effective interest rate on the Credit Line.

     The Company leases certain equipment, vehicles

    Principal repayments under the Term Note are scheduled as follows: $850 in 2005, $900 in 2006, and operating facilities. The Company's leases related to its operating facilities currently expire on various dates through$800 in 2007. At December 31, 2002, the future minimum lease payments required under non-cancellable lease provisions are approximately $2.9 million in 2003; $2.6 million in 2004; $2.2 million in 2005; $1.4 million in 2006; $700,000 in 2007; and no rental payments for the year 2008. Rent expense related to all operating leases for the years ended December 31, 2002, 2001 and 2000 was approximately $2.3 million, $1.7 million and $1.0 million, respectively.

     

    Amortization of debt premiums and discounts totaled $1,644 during 2004 and $0 in each 2003 and 2002 and is reflected as interest expense in the accompanying statement of operations.

    During 2002, Cruachem Ltd., a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company, entered into a long-term mortgage loan with The Royal Bank of Scotland. The original principal amount of the loan was £1.0 million, or approximately $1.5 million. Principal and interest arewere payable in quarterly installments. The loan carriescarried a 15 year15-year term and a fixed annual interest rate of 6.77%. Security for this loan iswas the Company'sCompany’s 45,000 square foot manufacturing facility located in Glasgow, Scotland. The loan carriescarried certain financial and non-financial covenants that must be met by Cruachem Ltd. that includesincluded a minimum net cash flow requirement. The net book value of the facility was approximately $1.9 million$2,000 at December 31, 2002.2003. During February 2004, the Company repaid the principal balance of the mortgage loan and therefore, the Company included the entire outstanding principal balance of this loan at December 31, 2003 within current liabilities.

     

    F.COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

    The Company has been named as a defendant in a lawsuit filed in Spain by a prospective distributor who claims that the Company breached a promise to grant the plaintiff a distributorship for certain of the Company’s products in a specific geographic area in Europe. The plaintiff is seeking monetary relief of approximately $500. The Company believes the lawsuit is without merit and intends to vigorously defend this matter.

    TRANSGENOMIC, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

    NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

    Years Ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002

    (Dollars in thousands except per share data)

    The Company is subject to a number of other claims of various amounts, which arise out of the normal course of business. In the opinion of management, the disposition of claims currently pending will not have a party to any material legal proceedings.

    G.    INCOME TAXESadverse effect on the Company’s financial position, results of operations or cash flows, after considering amounts already reflected in the consolidated financial statements.

     

    The Company leases certain equipment, vehicles and operating facilities. The Company’s leases related to its operating facilities currently expire on various dates through 2010. At December 31, 2004, the future minimum lease payments required under non-cancellable lease provisions are approximately $1,958 in 2005, $1,382 in 2006, $486 in 2007, $187 in 2008, $191 in 2009, and $181 in 2010. Rent expense related to all operating leases for the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002 was approximately $2,007, $2,487 and $2,266, respectively.

    At December 31, 2004, the Company had firm commitments totaling $798 to a vendor to purchase components used in WAVE Systems.

    G.INCOME TAXES

    Loss before income taxes consists of the following:

     
     Years ended December 31,
     
     
     2002
     2001
     2000
     
    United States $(19,640)$(7,448)$(8,231)
    International  (1,620) 71  (250)
      
     
     
     
      $(21,260)$(7,377)$(8,481)
      
     
     
     

    36


     

       Years ended December 31,

     
       2004

      2003

      2002

     

    United States

      $(30,467) $(19,809) $(19,640)

    International

       (3,999)  (3,084)  (1,620)
       


     


     


       $(34,466) $(22,893) $(21,260)
       


     


     


    The income tax provision consists of the following:

     
     Years ended December 31,
     
     2002
     2001
     2000
    CURRENT TAX EXPENSE (BENEFIT)         
     United States Federal $105 $24 $
    DEFERRED TAX EXPENSE (BENEFIT)         
     United States Federal      180
      
     
     
    Total Income Tax Provision $105 $24 $180
      
     
     

            The Company'sCompany’s provision for income taxes for the years ended December 31, 2002, 20012004, 2003 and 20002002 differs from the amounts determined by applying the statutory Federal income tax rate to loss before income taxes for the following reasons:

     
     2002
     2001
     2000
     
    Benefit at Federal Rate $(7,228)$(2,508)$(2,884)
    Increase (decrease) resulting from:          
    State income taxes—net of federal benefit  (518) (154) (119)
    Foreign subsidiary tax rate difference  224  (17) 30 
    Research and development tax credit  (188) (98) (69)
    Other—net  137  345  85 
    Valuation allowance  7,678  2,456  3,137 
      
     
     
     
    Total income tax expense (benefit) $105 $24 $180 
      
     
     
     

     

       2004

      2003

      2002

     

    Benefit at Federal Rate

      $(11,718) $(7,784) $(7,228)

    Increase (decrease) resulting from:

                 

    State income taxes—net of federal benefit

       (595)  (485)  (518)

    Foreign subsidiary tax rate difference

       493   427   224 

    Research and development tax credit

       (141)  (250)  (188)

    Impairment charges

       3,569   —     —   

    Other—net

       78   82   137 

    Valuation allowance

       8,220   8,075   7,678 
       


     


     


    Total income tax expense (benefit)

      $(94) $65  $105 
       


     


     


    The Company'sCompany’s deferred income tax asset at December 31, 20022004 and 20012003 is comprised of the following temporary differences:

     
     2002
     2001
     
    Net operating loss carryforward $23,099 $14,634 
    Allowance for doubtful accounts  58  45 
    Fixed asset depreciation  104  98 
    Accrued vacation  116  107 
    Other  (194) (16)
      
     
     
       23,183  14,868 
    Less valuation allowance  (23,183) (14,868)
      
     
     
      $ $ 
      
     
     

     

       2004

      2003

     

    Net operating loss carryforward

      $35,587  $29,292 

    Research and development credit carryforwards

       1,328   1,188 

    Deferred revenue

       708   400 

    Accrued vacation

       81   134 

    Other

       583   (422)
       


     


        38,287   30,592 

    Less valuation allowance

       (38,287)  (30,592)
       


     


       $—    $—   
       


     


    At December 31, 2002,2004, the Company has unusedhad total used federal tax net operating loss carryforwards of approximately $1.8 million$91,474 of which $1,770 expire in 2008, $3.7 million which$3,698 expire in 2009, $3.0 million which$2,970 expire in 2010, $0.9 million which$943 expire in 2011, $3.4 million which$3,425 expire in 2012, $1.8 million which$1,838 expire in 2018, $8.2 million which

    TRANSGENOMIC, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

    NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

    Years Ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002

    (Dollars in thousands except per share data)

    $8,182 expire in 2019, $9.7 million which$9,662 expire in 2020, $8.2 million which

    37



    $8,228 expire in 2021, and $19.6 million which will$16,862 expire in 2022. Approximately $11.8 million of the Company's total2022; $16,173 expire in 2023 and $17,723 expire in 2024. Of these federal net operating loss carryforwards, $11,820 were obtained in the acquisition of Annovis, Inc. and may be subject to certain restrictions. Additionally, atAt December 31, 2002,2004, the Company hashad unused state tax net operating loss carryforwards of approximately $22.2 million$37,619 that expire at various times between 2005 and 2024. At December 31, 2004, the Company had unused general business credits earned primarily through increased research expendituresand development credit carryforwards of approximately $0.9 million. These credits$1,328 that expire at various times between 2008 and 2021.2024. A valuation allowance has been provided in 2001 and 2000 for the remaining deferred tax assets, due to the Company'sCompany’s cumulative losses in recent years, expected losses in future years and an inability to utilize any additional losses as carrybacks. The Company will continue to assess the recoverability of deferred tax assets and the related valuation allowance. To the extent the Company begins to generate income in future years and it is determined that such valuation allowance is no longer required, the tax benefit of the remaining deferred tax assets will be recognized at such time.

    H.H.    EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLAN

    The Company maintains an employee 401(k) retirement savings plan that allows for voluntary contributions into designated investment funds by eligible employees. The Company matches the employees'employees’ contributions at the rate of 50% on the first 6% of contributions. The Company may at the discretion of its Board of Directors, make additional contributions on behalf of the Plan'sPlan’s participants. Company contributions were $507,000, $357,000 and $220,000approximately $500 for each of the three years ended December 31, 2002, 2001 and 2000, respectively.

    I.    STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY

    Common Stock Warrants.2004.

     The Company issued 2,000,000 shares of the Company's common stock, mainly through placement agents, in a private placement during 1997 and 1998. The Company also issued warrants to the Placement Agents with an exercise price of $5.00 per share (subject to certain cashless exercise rights) that have terms of five years expiring in 2003. Total shares eligible to be purchased through these warrants were 49,613 and 49,613 at December 31, 2002, and 2001, respectively. During 2002 the Company entered into an operating lease agreement with GE Capital. The agreement included the issuance of 13,762 warrants with an exercise price of $3.27 per share and a term of five years expiring in 2007. All warrants issued to GE Capital remain outstanding at December 31, 2002.

    I.STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

    Preferred Stock.

     

    The Company'sCompany’s Board of Directors is authorized to issue up to 15,000,000 shares of preferred stock in one or more series, from time to time, with such designations, powers, preferences and rights and such qualifications, limitations and restrictions as may be provided in a resolution or resolutions adopted by the Board of Directors. The authority of the Board of Directors includes, but is not limited to, the determination or fixing of the following with respect to shares of such class or any series thereof: (i) the number of shares; (ii) the dividend rate, whether dividends shall be cumulative and, if so, from which date; (iii) whether shares are to be redeemable and, if so, the terms and amount of any sinking fund providing

    38



    for the purchase or redemption of such shares; (iv) whether shares shall be convertible and, if so, the terms and provisions thereof; (v) what restrictions are to apply, if any, on the issue or reissue of any additional preferred stock; and (vi) whether shares have voting rights. The preferred stock may be issued with a preference over the common stock as to the payment of dividends. The Company has no current plans to issue any series of preferred stock. Classes of stock such as the preferred stock may be used, in certain circumstances, to create voting impediments on extraordinary corporate transactions or to frustrate persons seeking to effect a merger or otherwise to gain control of the Company. For the foregoing reasons, any preferred stock issued by the Company could have an adverse effect on the rights of the holders of the common stock.

    Common Stock.

     In May 2001,

    During 2004, the Company issued 1,889,5231,134,850 shares of common stock in connectionconjunction with conversions under the acquisition of Annovis, Inc. See Footnote O for further discussion of this acquisition.Laurus Loans.

     

    Date


      Price

      Shares
    Issued


      

    Net

    Proceeds


      Facility

      Applied To

    January 2004

      $2.20  650,000  $1,422  Credit Line  Principal

    February 2004

      $2.20  259,091   570  Credit Line  Principal

    December 2004

      $1.00  150,000   146  Term Note  Principal

    December 2004

      $1.00  75,759   72  Term Note  Interest
           
      

          
           1,134,850  $2,210      
           
      

          

    In September 2003, the Company issued 1,780,000 shares of its common stock and in November 2003, the Company issued 2,720,000 shares of its common stock in privately-negotiated sales. These shares were sold pursuant to the terms of a Securities Purchase Agreement, dated August 27, 2003. The sale of these shares was exempt from registration under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”) as a sale not involving a public offering. These shares have been registered for resale under the Securities Act. The net proceeds to the Company, after payment of transaction fees and other expenses of the offering, were approximately $4,202.

    In May 2001, Company shareholders approved the adoption of the Transgenomic, Inc. 2001 Employee Stock Purchase Plan that was subsequently implemented in November 2001. Substantially all of the Company'sCompany’s U.S. employees are eligible to participate in the Plan. Eligible employees authorize payroll deductions to be made for the purchase of shares. Such deductions are accumulated during

    TRANSGENOMIC, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

    NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

    Years Ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002

    (Dollars in thousands except per share data)

    a defined participation period at the end of which each participant is deemed to have been granted an option to purchase shares of stock from the Company at 85% of the fair market value of the Company stock as measured by the closing price of the stock on either the first or last business day of the participation period, whichever is lower. The number of shares purchased under the option is based upon the participants elected withholding amount. At the end of the participation period such option is automatically exercised. This plan is structured to qualify as an "employee“employee stock purchase plan"plan” under Section 423 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended. During 2004, 2003 and 2002 there were 76,902, 107,077 and 56,842 shares issued under this plan. During 2001 there were no shares issued under this plan.plan, respectively.

     In August 2000, the Company's Board of Directors authorized conversion

    Common Stock Warrants.

    The following is a summary of the Company's $12 million aggregate principal amount 6% convertible notes due March 25, 2002 into1,159,421 common stock upon meeting the required conversion conditions. On August 15, 2000, such conditionswarrants outstanding at December 31, 2004. No warrants expired or were met, and the notes were converted into 2,750,906 shares of common stock. All principal and accrued interest at the conversion date of approximately $13.9 million was converted to stockholders equity.exercised during 2004.

     On July 21, 2000, the Company issued 5,152,000 shares of common stock in its initial public offering at $15.00 per share. After payment of the underwriters' discounts and commissions and other expenses, the Company received net proceeds of approximately $69.9 million from this offering. In addition, since the date of the initial public offering, holders of warrants and options to purchase shares of common stock have exercised at various times.

    Warrant Holder


      Issue
    Year


      Expiration
    Year


      Underlying
    Shares


      Exercise
    Price


    Laurus Master Fund, Ltd.(1)

      2003  2010  200,000  $2.25

    Laurus Master Fund, Ltd.(1)

      2003  2010  200,000  $2.44

    Laurus Master Fund, Ltd.(1)

      2003  2010  150,000  $2.32

    Laurus Master Fund, Ltd.(1)

      2004  2011  125,000  $3.11

    Laurus Master Fund, Ltd.(1)

      2004  2011  400,000  $1.25

    TN Capital Equities, Ltd.(1)

      2003  2008  45,918  $2.94

    TN Capital Equities, Ltd.(1)

      2004  2009  15,566  $3.18

    GE Capital(2)

      2002  2007  13,762  $3.27

    GE Capital(2)

      2003  2008  9,175  $3.27

     In March 2000, the Company issued 25,000 common shares at $10.00 per share to an individual who was subsequently elected to the Company's Board of Directors.

    (1)These warrants were issued in conjunction with the Laurus Loans and subsequent modifications. Refer to Note E.

    39



    (2)These warrants were issued in conjunction with operating leases with GE Capital. While the leases have since been terminated, the warrants are still outstanding.

    J.J.    STOCK OPTIONS

    The Company'sCompany’s 1997 Stock Option Plan, as amended (the "Stock“Stock Option Plan"Plan”), allows the Company to grant both incentive stock options and nonqualified stock options to acquire shares of the Company'sCompany’s common stock to employees and directors of the Company and to nonemployee advisors. Either incentive or non-qualified stock options may be granted to employees of the Company, but only nonqualified stock options may be granted to nonemployee directors and advisors. The maximum number of shares for which options may be granted under the Stock Option Plan is 7,000,000. The Stock Option Plan is administered by the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors (the "Committee"“Committee”) which has the authority to set the number, exercise price, term and vesting provisions of the options granted under the Stock Option Plan, subject to the terms thereof. The options must be granted at exercise prices not less than the fair market value of the common stock on the date of the grant. Generally, the stock options vest at a rate of either 20% per year over a five-year period or 331/3% per year over a three-year period and expire 10 years after the date the option was granted. If the option holder ceases to be employed by the Company, the Company will have the right to terminate any outstanding but unexercised options.

     

    The following table summarizes activity under the Stock Option Plan during the three years ended December 31, 2002:2004:

     
     Number of
    Options

     Weighted Average
    Exercise Price

    Balance at January 1, 2000:  3,537,750 $5.00
     Granted  1,137,000  10.57
     Exercised  (200,969) 5.28
     Canceled  (438,900) 6.45
      
     
    Balance at December 31, 2000  4,034,881  6.43
     Granted  1,865,950  7.88
     Exercised  (470,900) 5.00
     Canceled  (296,100) 9.75
      
     
    Balance at December 31, 2001:  5,133,831  6.90
     Granted  632,000  5.09
     Exercised  (81,900) 5.01
     Canceled  (539,021) 7.69
      
     
    Balance at December 31, 2002:  5,144,910 $6.62
      
     
    Exercisable at December 31, 2002  3,295,683 $6.38

     

       Number of
    Options


      Weighted
    Average
    Exercise
    Price


    Balance at January 1, 2002

      5,133,831   6.90

    Granted

      632,000   5.09

    Exercised

      (81,900)  5.01

    Canceled

      (539,021)  7.69
       

     

    Balance at December 31, 2002:

      5,144,910   6.62

    Granted

      1,282,000   1.64

    Exercised

      —     —  

    Canceled

      (733,994)  7.25
       

     

    Balance at December 31, 2003:

      5,692,916   6.62
       

       

    Granted

      360,000   1.70

    Exercised

      —     —  

    Canceled

      (964,879)  5.24
       

     

    Balance at December 31, 2004:

      5,088,037  $5.09
       

     

    Exercisable at December 31, 2004

      4,214,214  $5.55
       

     

    TRANSGENOMIC, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

    NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

    Years Ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002

    (Dollars in thousands except per share data)

    The weighted average fair value per share of options granted in 2004, 2003 and 2002 2001was $0.40, $0.93 and 2000 was $2.92, $2.32 and $5.43, respectively.

     

    The Company has elected to follow the measurement provisions of APB No. 25, under which no recognition of expense is required in accounting for stock options granted to employees for which the exercise price equals or exceeds the deemed fair market value of the stock at the grant date. In those cases where options have been granted with an exercise price below the deemed fair market value, the Company recognizes compensation expense using the straight-line method over the vesting periods of the individual stock options.

    40



    Stock-based compensation expense recorded by the Company represents amortization of unearned compensation related to options granted to employees with an exercise price less than the deemed fair market value at the date of grant and options granted to non-employees. During 2002, 20012004, 2003 and 2000,2002, the Company recorded compensation expense of $131,000, $139,000$0, $93 and $861,000,$131, respectively. The expense amounts were calculated using the Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following assumptions: no common stock dividends, risk-free interest rates ranging from 3.10% to 6.53%; volatility ranging from 35% to 85%; and an expected option life of 1 to 7.5 years. Additionally, in connection with the 2000 sale of the Company's non-life sciences instrument product line, the Company accelerated the vesting of 71,700 options, which would have otherwise been forfeited. Compensation expense of approximately $574,000 was recorded for these options during the first quarter of 2000, representing the difference between the exercise price of the options and the deemed fair value of the common stock at the date the vesting was accelerated. In addition, 218,700 options were forfeited as a result of the sale.

     

    The following table summarizes information about options outstanding as of December 31, 2002:

     
     Options Outstanding
     Options Exercisable
    Range of Exercise Prices
     Number Outstanding
     Weighted-Average
    Remaining
    Contractual Life

     Weighted-Average
    Exercise Price

     Number Exercisable
     Weighted-Average
    Exercise Price

     
      
     (in years)

      
      
      
    $  2.51—$  5.00 2,628,550 5.5 $4.72 2,115,150 $5.00
    $  5.01—$  7.50 1,217,787 7.2 $6.17 533,457 $6.15
    $  7.51—$10.00 821,942 6.6 $9.84 367,845 $9.79
    $10.01—$12.50 105,000 7.3 $11.94 48,600 $11.93
    $12.51—$15.00 371,631 6.5 $13.00 230,631 $13.00
      
     
     
     
     
      5,144,910 6.2 $6.62 3,295,683 $6.38
      
     
     
     
     

    K.    SALE OF BUSINESS LINE2004:

     In May 2000, the Company sold the assets related to its non-life sciences instrument product line for a total adjusted purchase price of $5.65 million plus reimbursement by the purchaser of approximately $400,000 of expenses paid by the Company in connection with this product line since March 31, 2000. The effective date of the transaction was April 1, 2000.

       Options Outstanding

      Options Exercisable

    Range of Exercise Prices


      

    Number

    Outstanding


      

    Weighted-Average

    Remaining

    Contractual Life


      

    Weighted-Average

    Exercise Price


      

    Number

    Exercisable


      

    Weighted-Average

    Exercise Price


          (in years)         

    $  1.00—$  1.30

      408,335  6.8  $1.30  155,011  $1.30

    $  1.31—$  2.60

      1,009,167  7.9  $1.89  551,850  $1.90

    $  2.61—$  3.90

      50,002  5.5  $2.90  38,336  $2.90

    $  3.91—$  5.20

      2,142,200  3.0  $5.00  2,142,200  $5.00

    $  5.21—$  6.50

      768,182  6.1  $6.16  692,633  $6.15

    $  6.51—$  9.10

      10,000  6.4  $9.00  10,000  $9.00

    $  9.11—$10.40

      396,420  5.6  $9.88  358,253  $9.88

    $10.41—$13.00

      303,731  5.2  $12.80  265,931  $12.81
       
      
      

      
      

       5,088,037  5.1  $5.09  4,214,214  $5.55
       
      
      

      
      

    K.OPERATING SEGMENT AND GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION

    The Company realized a gain on the sale of these assets of approximately $784,000 before taxes.

    L.    OPERATING SEGMENT AND GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION

            Prior to 2002 the Company was managed and operated on a fully integrated basis in one operating segment. During 2002, management determined it was appropriate to evaluate the Company's operations based upon the nature of the products and services provided. Accordingly, the Company has determined that it operates in two reportable segments, BioSystems and Nucleic Acids. Operations for these segments are evaluated based upon specific identification of revenues and expenses associated with the business activities resulting in a segment operating income. Expenses that cannot be directly identified to an operating activity or are considered corporate overhead are not allocated to the segments in arriving at

    41



    operating income for the segment. Generally, decisions regarding asset allocation, financing, taxes or other items impacting the Company'sCompany’s Balance Sheet are made at the corporate level and, accordingly, operating segment Balance Sheet information is not typically reviewed by operating decision makers.

     

    The BioSystems operating segment generates revenue from the sale of automated instrument systems and associated consumable products and services. This segments products are based upon two of the Company'sCompany’s three core competencies, separations chemistries and enzymology. Specifically, this segment'ssegment’s main products are the WAVE system, related bioconsumables and research services.

     

    The Nucleic Acids operating segment generates revenue from the sale of products and services based upon all three of the Company'sCompany’s core competencies, nucleic acid chemistries, separations chemistries and enzymology. Specifically, this segments main

    TRANSGENOMIC, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

    NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

    Years Ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002

    (Dollars in thousands except per share data)

    products are nucleic acid building blocks or "phosphoramidites"“phosphoramidites”, oligonucleotides, fluorescent markers, dyes and associated reagents and novel chemistry and process development services.

     

    The following is information for net sales and operating income by segment.

     
     2002
     2001
     2000
     
    Sales          
     BioSystems $24,235 $28,040 $23,712 
     Nucleic Acids  13,319  10,427   
      
     
     
     
     Sub-total  37,554  38,467  23,712 
     Divested product line      2,171 
      
     
     
     
     Total $37,554 $38,467 $25,883 
      
     
     
     
    Loss/Income from operations          
     BioSystems $(9,417)$(4,595)$(3,549)
     Nucleic Acids  (1,004) 1,090   
     Corporate  (11,276) (6,234) (4,473)
      
     
     
     
     Sub-total  (21,697) (9,739) (8,022)
     Divested product line      (671)
      
     
     
     
     Total $(21,697)$(9,739)$(8,693)
      
     
     
     

    42


     

       2004

      2003

      2002

     

    Net Sales

                 

    BioSystems

      $25,243  $26,044  $24,235 

    Nucleic Acids

       8,546   7,822   13,319 
       


     


     


    Total

      $33,789  $33,866  $37,554 
       


     


     


    Loss from operations

                 

    BioSystems

      $(2,294) $(2,786) $(9,417)

    Nucleic Acids

       (17,623)  (12,440)  (1,004)

    Corporate

       (9,143)  (7,362)  (11,276)
       


     


     


    Total

      $(29,060) $(22,588) $(21,697)
       


     


     


    During 2004, sales to Geron Corporation totaled $4,151 and represented 49% of net sales within our Nucleic Acids operating segment and 12% of total consolidated net sales. During 2003 and 2002 no single customer accounted for more than 10% of operating segment or consolidated net sales.

    The following is information for fixed assets and fixed asset additions by segment. Fixed assets are tracked by location and department and thus can be identified to operating segments even though specific segment Balance Sheets are not produced.

     
     2002
     2001
    Fixed Assets      
     BioSystems $4,895 $3,865
     Nucleic Acids  8,892  1,811
     Corporate  1,865  2,509
      
     
     Total $15,652 $8,185
      
     
    Fixed Asset Additions      
     BioSystems $2,533 $2,725
     Nucleic Acids  8,563  1,365
     Corporate  372  1,616
      
     
     Total $11,468 $5,706
      
     

     

       2004

      2003

    Fixed Assets

            

    BioSystems

      $2,695  $3,412

    Nucleic Acids

       10,150   13,991

    Corporate

       680   1,301
       

      

    Total

      $13,525  $18,704
       

      

    Fixed Asset Additions

            

    BioSystems

      $901  $1,000

    Nucleic Acids

       848   5,393

    Corporate

       9   20
       

      

    Total

      $1,758  $6,413
       

      

    The following is supplemental information for net sales by geographic area.

     
     2002
     2001
     2000
    Sales by Geographic Area:         
     United States $16,805 $18,063 $11,586
     Europe  16,011  15,918  10,237
     Pacific Rim  4,129  2,901  3,313
     Other  609  1,585  747
      
     
     
     Total $37,554 $38,467 $25,883
      
     
     

     

       2004

      2003

      2002

    Sales by Geographic Area:

                

    United States

      $13,580  $12,251  $16,805

    Europe

       15,392   15,955   16,011

    Pacific Rim

       2,794   3,335   4,129

    Other

       2,023   2,325   609
       

      

      

    Total

      $33,789  $33,866  $37,554
       

      

      

    Long-lived assets by geographic area as of December 31 are as follows:

     
     2002
     2001
    United States $23,882 $21,865
    Europe  8,203  2,223
    Pacific Rim  30  44
      
     
    Total $32,115 $24,132
      
     

     During 2002 no single customer accounted for more than 10% of total sales. During 2001, one customer accounted for approximately 14% of our total sales. No single customer accounted for more than 10% of total sales in 2000.

       2004

      2003

    United States

      $7,754  $20,935

    Europe

       7,564   9,705

    Pacific Rim

       11   32
       

      

    Total

      $15,329  $30,672
       

      

    43



    M.    SUPPLEMENTAL CASH FLOW INFORMATION

     
     2002
     2001
     2000
    Cash paid for interest $30 $10 $233
    Cash paid for income taxes $120 $3 $4
    Noncash investing and financing activities:         
    Liabilities assumed in connection with business acquisitions $ $3,388 $
    Conversion of Notes Payable and Accrued Interest into Common Stock $ $ $13,909
    Reclassification of demonstration inventory to property $ $ $975
    Issuance of common stock as acquisition consideration $ $13,084 $

    N.    ALLOWANCE FOR DOUBTFUL ACCOUNTSTRANSGENOMIC, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

     The following is a summary of activity for the allowance for doubtful accounts during each of the three years ended

    NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

    Years Ended December 31, 2002:

     
     Beginning
    Balance

     Additional
    Charges
    to Income

     Deductions
    from Reserve

     Ending
    Balance

    Year Ended December 31, 2002 $213 $418 $181 $450
    Year Ended December 31, 2001 $180 $65 $32 $213
    Year Ended December 31, 2000 $161 $19 $ $180

    O.    ACQUISITION2004, 2003 and 2002

     Effective May 1, 2001, the Company acquired Annovis, Inc, a privately held company, for approximately $16.9 million through the issuance of approximately 1.9 million shares of Transgenomic, Inc. common stock, the payment of approximately $563,000

    (Dollars in cash in lieu of common stock to certain Annovis stockholders and the payment of approximately $3.2 million of direct acquisition related expenses. The acquisition was structured as a merger of Annovis with a subsidiary of the Company and resulted in Annovis becoming a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company. Annovis is a specialty chemicals company that develops, manufactures and markets a wide variety of nucleic acid based products and service for the life sciences industry. Annovis's results of operations have been included in the accompanying financial statements beginning on May 1, 2001.

            The Company accounted for this transaction as a purchase. The Company obtained an appraisal of the fair value of the tangible and intangible assets acquired from an independent appraiser. All identifiable

    44



    tangible and intangible assets acquired and liabilities assumed have been allocated a portion of the cost equal to their estimated fair values as follows:

    Net tangible assets and liabilities $1,390
    Intangible assets $60
    Goodwill $15,463
      
    Total Purchase Price (including direct expenses) $16,913
      

            The costs assigned to intangible assets have been amortized through December 31, 2002 on a straight-line basis over a period averaging 5 years.

            The Company's unaudited pro forma results of operations for the year ended December 31, 2001, assuming the acquisition of Annovis, Inc. occurred as of the beginning of the period presented is as follows:

     
     Twelve Months Ended December 31,
     
     
     2001
     2000
     
    Net Sales $42,581 $32,728 
    Net Loss $(7,672)$(10,293)
    Basic and diluted loss per share $(0.33)$(0.56)

    P.    QUARTERLY RESULTS (UNAUDITED)thousands except per share data)

     

    L.QUARTERLY RESULTS (UNAUDITED)

    The following table contains selected unaudited consolidated statements of operations data for each quarter for fiscal years 20022004 and 2001.2003.

     
     2002
     
     
     1st Quarter
     2nd Quarter
     3rd Quarter
     4th Quarter
     Total
     
    Net Sales $9,831 $9,424 $9,087 $9,212 $37,554 
    Gross Profit  5,108  4,862  4,249  3,766  17,985 
    Net loss $(3,359)$(3,981)$(4,727)$(9,298)$(21,365)
    Basic & Diluted Loss Per Share $(0.14)$(0.17)$(0.20)$(0.40)$(0.91)
    Basic and Diluted Weighted Average Shares Outstanding  23,653,544  23,699,047  23,483,315  23,498,935  23,582,687 

    45


     
     2001
     
     
     1st Quarter
     2nd Quarter
     3rd Quarter
     4th Quarter
     Total
     
    Net Sales $7,930 $9,545 $10,254 $10,738 $38,467 
    Gross Profit  4,263  5,408  5,663  5,935  21,269 
    Net loss $(1,128)$(1,648)$(1,910)$(2,715)$(7,401)
    Basic & Diluted Loss Per Share $(0.05)$(0.07)$(0.08)$(0.12)$(0.33)
    Basic and Diluted Weighted Average Shares Outstanding  21,227,564  22,504,309  23,183,637  23,302,793  22,560,057 

     

       2004

     
       1st Quarter

      2nd Quarter

      3rd Quarter

      4th Quarter

      Total

     

    Net Sales

      $8,629  $9,011  $8,194  $7,955  $33,789 

    Gross Profit

      $2,861  $3,153  $1,337  $1,842  $9,193 

    Net loss

      $(3,859) $(15,132) $(8,442) $(6,939) $(34,372)

    Basic & Diluted Loss Per Share

      $(0.13) $(0.52) $(0.29) $(0.24) $(1.19)

    Basic and Diluted Weighted Average Shares Outstanding

       28,728   29,053   29,078   29,338   29,006 

       2003

     
       1st Quarter

      2nd Quarter

      3rd Quarter

      4th Quarter

      Total

     

    Net Sales

      $9,505  $8,481  $7,537  $8,343  $33,866 

    Gross Profit

      $3,691  $2,556  $775  $2,529  $9,551 

    Net loss

      $(3,596) $(4,670) $(6,097) $(8,595) $(22,958)

    Basic & Diluted Loss Per Share

      $(0.15) $(0.20) $(0.25) $(0.32) $(0.94)

    Basic and Diluted Weighted Average Shares Outstanding

       23,519   23,540   24,177   26,723   24,484 

    Earnings per share are computed independently for each of the quarters presented. Therefore, the sum of the quarterly per share losses may not equal the annual loss per share. Effective May 1, 2001,

    M.SALE OF SPECIALTY OLIGONUCLEOTIDE MANUFACTURING FACILITY

    On November 11, 2004, the Company acquired Annovis,sold the assets associated with its specialty oligonucleotides manufacturing facility in Boulder, Colorado to a subsidiary of Eyetech Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Annovis's results(“Eyetech”). The sale price was $3,000 in cash plus the assumption of operations have been includedthe lease on the Boulder facility and of certain equipment leases with a gross value of $2,377. Substantially all of the 27 employees at the Boulder facility became Eyetech employees. Net proceeds from the sale (after transaction expenses and fees paid to our investment advisors) equaled approximately $2,700. In conjunction with this transaction, we recorded a gain on sale of $1,466 in the accompanying financial statements beginningfourth quarter of 2004.

    N.RESTRUCTURING PLANS

    On November 13, 2004, the Company’s Board of Directors approved a restructuring plan designed to refocus on May 1, 2001.

    Q.    CORPORATE RESTRUCTURING AND ADDITIONAL FINANCING

    the BioSystems operating segment and to better align the Company’s cost structure with anticipated revenues. The plan (which is incremental to the sale of the specialty oligonucleotide manufacturing facility in Boulder, Colorado facility) included a workforce reduction of approximately 60 positions and the closure of two domestic research and development facilities associated with our Nucleic Acids operating segment and two European field offices. Additionally, the Company eliminated approximately 10 positions at its chemical building blocks manufacturing facility in Glasgow, Scotland. In conjunction with these changes, the Company incurred a charge of $3,570 during the quarter ending December 31, 2004 consisting of severance benefits of $1,406, future rents on closed facilities (net of projected sublease rents) of $1,241, the write-off property and equipment specifically attributable to closed facilities of $740 and other costs of $183. The Company has experienced net losseshad accrued expenses associated with this restructuring plan of $1,909 at December 31, 2004 of which $1,486 is expected to be paid 2005 and negative cash flows from operations. As a result, during$423 in 2006.

    During the fourth quarter of 2002 management formulated and executed a significant portion of a restructuring plan. The plan was developed to reduce expenses thereby better aligning the Company'sCompany’s expense structure with current business prospects. The plan included employee terminations, office closures, termination of collaborations and write-offs of abandoned intellectual property. Specifically, in the fourth quarter of 2002 the Company notified approximately 60 employees of their termination, notified landlords of our intent to close four facilities and reduce our space commitment under lease at two other facilities, terminated certain consulting and collaboration agreements and abandoned certain patents. As a result of the plan $3.3 million$3,282 in restructuring charges were recorded and are included in operating expenses. These charges consisted of approximately $800,000$775 of employee severance costs, $1.2 million$1,200 in office closure

    TRANSGENOMIC, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

    NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

    Years Ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002

    (Dollars in thousands except per share data)

    related costs, $400,000$400 of collaboration and other agreement termination charges and $900,000$900 in write-offs of abandoned intellectual property. Approximately 45% of the total charges were for non-cash items. Management expects that, as a result of the restructuring, our total operating expenses will be initially decreased by 20% to 25% from 2002 levels. Additional restructuring charges totaling between $500,000 and $700,000 are expected$741 were incurred in the first half of 2003. The Company had accrued expenses associated with these restructuring activities of $0 at December 31, 2004 and $227 at December 31, 2003.

     Additionally, in

    O.SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

    On March 200318, 2005, Laurus agreed to further extend the borrowing base waiver on the Credit Line until March 31, 2006. In connection with this waiver, the Company enteredagreed to allow Laurus to convert $1,872 of the outstanding principal balance under the Credit Line into 3,600,000 shares of its common stock. In addition, on March 24, 2005 the Company agreed to allow Laurus to convert $650 of the outstanding principal balance of the Term Note into 1,250,000 shares of common stock. As a loan commitment agreement with a financial institution for a secured line of credit up to a maximum commitment of $5.0 million. Collateral forresult, the line of credit consists of qualified accounts receivable balances. FundsCompany increased the amount available under the line are equal to 80% of eligible accounts receivable balances. Management expects to finalizeCredit Line by $1,872 and eliminated substantially all remaining 2005 scheduled principal payments on the line of credit agreement in the second quarter of 2003. The proposed term of the agreement is 1 year carrying a variable interest rate of 2.25% over prime. Management believes, as a result of the restructuring activities, current cash balances and funds available from the secured line of credit will be sufficient to fund operations through at least fiscal year 2003.Term Loan.

    46



    Item 9.

    Item 9.    Changes in and Disagreement With Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure.

    None.

    Item 9A.Controls and Procedures

    A review and evaluation was performed by the Company’s management, including the Company’s Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”) and Chief Financial Officer (“CFO”), of the effectiveness of the design and operation of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this annual report. Based on that review and evaluation, the CEO and CFO concluded that the Company’s current disclosure controls and procedures, as designed and implemented, were effective. There have been no changes in the Company’s internal controls subsequent to the date of their evaluation.

    Item 9B.Other Information

    None

    Part III

     None.


    Part III

    Item 10.    Directors and Executive Officers of the Registrant.

            We will file a definitive Proxy Statement with the Securities Exchange Commission not later than April 30, 2003. Information about our directors required by Item 401 of Regulation S-K and information about our directors and executive officers required by Item 405 of Regulation S-K is incorporated by reference to the Proxy Statement. Information about our Executive Officers is shown in Part I of this filing.

    Item 10.Directors and Executive Officers of the Registrant.

    Item 11.    Executive Compensation.

    We will file a definitive Proxy Statement relating to our 2004 Annual Meeting of Stockholders with the Securities Exchange Commission not later than April 29, 2005. Information required by this item is incorporated by reference to our definitive Proxy Statement.

     

    Item 11.Executive Compensation.

    Information required by this Item is incorporated by reference to our definitive Proxy Statement.

    Item 12.    Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management.

            Information required by this Item is incorporated by reference to our definitive Proxy Statement.

    Item 12.Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management.

    Item 13.    Certain Relationships and Related Transactions

    Information required by this Item is incorporated by reference to our definitive Proxy Statement.

    Item 13.Certain Relationships and Related Transactions

    Information required by this Item 14.    Controls and Proceduresis incorporated by reference to our definitive Proxy Statement.

    Item 14.Principal Accountant Fees and Services

    Information required by this Item is incorporated by reference to our definitive Proxy Statement.

    Part IV

     Our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded, based on their evaluation within 90 days of the filing date of this report, that our disclosure controls and procedures are effective for gathering, analyzing and disclosing the information we are required to disclose in our reports under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. There have been no significant changes in our internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect these controls subsequent to the date of the previously mentioned evaluation.


    Part IV

    Item 15.    Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules and Reports of Form 8-K.

      (a)
      The following documents are filed as part of this report:

      1.
      Financial Statements

          The financial statements listed on page 2 of this report are filed herewith.

        2.
        Financial Statement Schedules—None.

        3.
        Exhibits. The Exhibits required by Item 601 of Regulation S-K of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, filed as part of this report are listed in the Exhibit Index under paragraph (c) of this Item 14.

      (b)
      Reports on Form 8-K. The Company did not file any reports on Form 8-K during the quarter ended December 31, 2002.

    47


        (c)
        Exhibits.

      2.1Item 15.Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules.

      (a)The following documents are filed as part of this report:

      1.Financial Statements. The following financial statements of the Registrant are included in response to Item 8 of this report:

      2.Financial Statement Schedules. The following financial statement scheduled is included in response to Item 8 of this report:

      Schedule II-Valuation and Qualifying Accounts

      3.Exhibits. The following exhibits were filed as required by Item 15(a)(3) of this report. Exhibit numbers refer to the paragraph numbers under Item 601 of Regulation S-K:

        2.1    Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of April 30, 2001, by and among Transgenomic, Inc.,Registrant, TBIO Nebraska, Inc., TBIO, Inc. and Annovis, Inc.(3) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 to Registrant’s Report on Form 8-K filed on May 31, 2001)
      2.3
        2.2    Addendum to Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of May 18, 2001, by and among Transgenomic, Inc.,Registrant, TBIO Nebraska, Inc., TBIO, Inc. and Annovis, Inc.(3) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.2 to Registrant’s Report on Form 8-K filed on May 31, 2001)
        2.3  Asset Purchase Agreement, dated as of November 8, 2004, by and between Registrant and Eyetech Boulder Inc.
      3.1  Second Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Registrant(2)Registrant (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2 to Amendment No. 1 to Registration Statement on Form S-1 (Registration No. 333-32174) filed on May 17, 2000)
      3.2  Bylaws of the Registrant(1)Registrant (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to Registration Statement on Form S-1 (Registration No. 333-32174) filed on March 10, 2000)
      4
        4.1    Form of Certificate of the Registrant'sRegistrant’s Common Stock(1)Stock (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4 to Registration Statement on Form S-1 (Registration No. 333-32174) filed on March 10, 2000)
      10.1  Third Fourth Amended and Restated 1997 Stock Option Plan of the Registrant(4)Registrant
      10.2  1999 UK Approved Stock Option Sub Plan of the Registrant(1)Registrant (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.7 to Registration Statement on Form S-1 (Registration No. 333-32174) filed on March 10, 2000)
      10.3Employee Stock Purchase Plan of the Registrant (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4(b) to Registration Statement on Form S-8 (Registration No. 333-71866) filed on October 19, 2001)
      10.4    Employment Agreement, dated April 1, 2000, by and between the Registrant and Collin J. D'Silva(1)D’Silva (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.8 to Registration Statement on Form S-1 (Registration No. 333-32174) filed on March 10, 2000)
      10.4
      10.5    Employee Stock Purchase PlanAmendment No. 1 to the Employment Agreement, effective March 1, 2000, by and between Transgenomic, Inc. and Collin D’Silva (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.9 of the Registrant(5)Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on May 17, 2004)
      10.5
      10.6  Employment Agreement, effective July 31, 2004, by and between Transgenomic, Inc. and Michael A. Summers (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.11 to Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on November 15, 2004).
      10.7    Employment Agreement, dated June 1, 2001,January 22, 2002, between the Registrant and John L. Allbery(7)Keith A. Johnson (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on May 14, 2002)
      10.6
      10.8    License Agreement, dated September 1, 1994, between Registrant and Professor Dr. Gunther Bonn, et. al. and Amendment thereto, dated March 14, 1997(1)1997 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.14 to Registration Statement on Form S-1 (Registration No. 333-32174) filed on March 10, 2000)
      10.7
      10.9    License Agreement, dated August 20, 1997, between the Registrant and Leland Stanford Junior University(1)University (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.15 to Registration Statement on Form S-1 (Registration No. 333-32174) filed on March 10, 2000)
      10.8Supply Agreement, dated January 1, 2000, between the Registrant and Hitachi Instruments(1)
      10.9Services Provider Agreement, dated December 28, 2001, between the Registrant and Genodyssee S.A.(7)
      10.10Revolving Line of Credit Agreement, dated December 28, 2001, between the Registrant and Genodyssee S.A.(7)
      10.11  License Agreement, dated December 1, 1989, between Cruachem Holdings Ltd. (a wholly owned subsidiary of the Registrant) and Millipore Corporation(7)Corporation (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.13 to Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed on March 25, 2002)

      10.1210.11  Sublicense Agreement, dated October 1, 1991, between Cruachem Holdings Ltd. (a wholly owned subsidiary of the Registrant) and Applied Biosystems, Inc.(7) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.14 to Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed on March 25, 2002)
      10.13Employment Agreement, dated January 22, 2002, between the Registrant and Keith A. Johnson(8)
      10.14Term Loan Agreement, dated February 1, 2002, between the Registrant and Genodyssee S.A. Certain confidential portion s of this Exhibit were omitted by means of redacting a portion of the text. This Exhibit has been filed separately with the Secretary of the Commission with the redacted text pursuant to the Registrant's Application Requesting Confidential Treatment under Rule 24b-2 of the Securities Exchange Act(8)
      10.1510.12  Missives, dated May 17, 2002, between Cruachem Limited (a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Registrant) and Robinson Nugent (Scotland) Limited(9)Limited (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on August 14, 2002)
      10.13License Amendment Agreement, dated June 2, 2003, by and between Geron Corporation and the Registrant. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on August 12, 2003)
      10.14Supply Agreement, dated January 1, 2000, between the Registrant and Hitachi Instruments (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.16 to Registration Statement on Form S-1 (Registration No. 333-32174) filed on March 10, 2000)
      10.15Form of Securities Purchase Agreement by and between the Registrant and various counterparties, dated August 27, 2003 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10 to the Registrant’s Report on Form 8-K filed on August 29, 2003)
      10.16  Securities Purchase Agreement by and between The Royal Bank of Scotland plcthe Registrant and Cruachem Limited (a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Registrant),Geron Corporation, dated August 18, 2002(10)June 2, 2003 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.0 to Amendment No. 3 to Registration Statement on Form S-3 (Registration No. 333-108319) as filed on October 14, 2003)
      10.17  Standard Security Agreement by Cruachem Limited (a wholly-owned subsidiaryand between the Registrant and Laurus Master Fund, Ltd., dated December 3, 2003 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Registration Statement on Form S-3 of the Registrant) in Favour of The Royal Bank of Scotland plc, dated August 13, 2002(10)Registrant (Registration No. 333-111442) filed on December 22, 2003)
      10.18  LeaseAmendment to Security Agreement and Related Documents by and between the Registrant and Laurus Master Fund, Ltd., dated August 31, 2002 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Registration Statement on Form S-3 (Registration No. 333-118970) as filed on September 14, 2004)
      10.19Secured Revolving Note by and between the Registrant and Laurus Master Fund, Ltd., dated December 3, 2003 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Registration Statement on Form S-3 of the Registrant (Registration No. 333-111442) filed on December 22, 2003)
      10.20Secured Convertible Minimum Borrowing Note by and between the Registrant and Laurus Master Fund, Ltd., dated December 3, 2003 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Registration Statement on Form S-3 of the Registrant (Registration No. 333-111442) filed on December 22, 2003)
      10.21Secured Convertible Minimum Borrowing Note Series B by and between the Registrant and Laurus Master Fund, Ltd., dated December 3, 2003, as amended on April 15, 2004 (incorporated by reference to the Registration Statement of the Registrant (Registration No. 333-114661) filed on April 21, 2004)
      10.22Common Stock Purchase Warrant by and between the Registrant and Laurus Master Fund, Ltd., dated December 3, 2003 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to the Registration Statement on Form S-3 of the Registrant (Registration No. 333-111442) filed on December 22, 2003)
      10.23Registration Rights Agreement by and between Yew Tree Investments LTD., LLLP and the Registrant and Laurus Master Fund, Ltd., dated August 23, 2002(10)December 3, 2003 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 to the Registration Statement on Form S-3 of the Registrant (Registration No. 333-111442) filed on December 22, 2003)

      48


      10.19
      10.24  Master Lease AgreementCommon Stock Purchase Warrant by and between General Electric Capital Corporation and the Registrant and TN Capital Equities, Ltd., dated December 3, 2003 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.6 to the Registration Statement on Form S-3 of the Registrant (Registration No. 333-111442) filed on December 22, 2003)
      10.25Securities Purchase Agreement by and between the Registrant and Laurus Master Fund, Ltd., dated February 19, 2004, as amended on April 15, 2004 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Registration Statement on Form S-3 of the Registrant (Registration No. 333-114661) filed on April 21, 2004)
      10.26Amendment to Securities Purchase Agreement and Related Document by and between the Registrant and Laurus Master Fund, Ltd., dated August 31, 2004 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Registration Statement on Form S-3 (Registration No. 333-118970) as filed on September 14, 2004)
      10.27Secured Convertible Term Note by and between the Registrant and Laurus Master Fund, Ltd., dated February 19, 2004, as amended on April 15, 2004 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Registration Statement on Form S-3 of the Registrant (Registration No. 333-114661) filed on April 21, 2004)

      10.28Common Stock Purchase Warrant by and between the Registrant and Laurus Master Fund, Ltd., dated February 19, 2004, as amended on April 15, 2004 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Registration Statement on Form S-3 of the Registrant (Registration No. 333-114661) filed on April 21, 2004)
      10.29Registration Rights Agreement by and between the Registrant and Laurus Master Fund, Ltd., dated February 19, 2004 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to the Registration Statement on Form S-3 of the Registrant (Registration No. 333-114661) filed on April 21, 2004)
      10.30Common Stock Purchase Warrants by and between the Registrant and TN Capital Equities, Ltd., dated March 1, 2004 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Registration Statement on Form S-3 of the Registrant (Registration No. 333-114661) filed on April 21, 2004)
      10.31Common Stock Purchase Warrant by and between the Registrant and Laurus Master Fund, Ltd., dated August 31, 2004 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Registration Statement on Form S-3 (Registration No. 333-118970) as filed on September 14, 2004)
      10.32Engagement Agreement by and between the Registrant and Goldsmith, Agio, Helms Securities, Inc., dated March 19, 2004, as amended August 12, 20022004 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.10 to Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on November 15, 2004)
      21  Subsidiaries of the Registrant
      23  Consent of Deloitte & Touche LLPIndependent Registered Public Accounting Firm
      24  Powers of Attorney
      31.1  Certification pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
      31.2  Certification pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
      32     Certifications pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


      (1)
      This Exhibit is incorporated by reference to the Registration Statement of the Registrant (Registration No. 333-32174), which was filed on March 10, 2000.

      (2)
      This Exhibit is incorporated by reference to the Registration Statement of the Registrant (Registration No. 333-32174), as amended by Amendment 1, which amendment was filed on May 17, 2000.

      (3)
      This Exhibit is incorporated by reference to the Registration Statement of the Registrant (Registration No. 000-30975), which was filed on May 31, 2001.

      (4)
      This Exhibit is incorporated by reference to the Registrant's Report on Form 10-Q, which was filed on August 14, 2001.

      (5)
      This Exhibit is incorporated by reference to the Registration Statement of the Registrant (Registration No. 333-71866), which was filed on October 19, 2001.

      (6)
      This Exhibit is incorporated by reference to the Registrant's Report on Form 10-Q, which was filed on May 14, 2001.

      (7)
      This Exhibit is incorporated by reference to the Registrant's Annual Report on Form 10-K, which was filed on March 25, 2002.

      (8)
      This Exhibit is incorporated by reference to the Registrant's Report on Form 10-Q, which was filed on May 14, 2002.

      (9)
      This Exhibit is incorporated by reference to the Registrant's Report on Form 10-Q, which was filed on August 14, 2002.

      (10)
      This Exhibit is incorporated by reference to the Registrant's Report on Form 10-Q, which was filed on November 12, 2002.

      49



      SIGNATURES

       

      Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized on this 31st30th day of March 2003.2005.

      TRANSGENOMIC, INC.

      By:

      /s/    COLLIN J. D’SILVA        
        TRANSGENOMIC, INC.



      By


      /s/  
      COLLIN J. D'SILVA      

      Collin J. D'Silva,
      D’Silva,

      Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

       

      Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities indicated on this 31st14th day of March 2003.April 2005.

      Signature

      Title


      Signature


      Title


      /s/    COLLINCOLLIN J. D'SILVA      D’SILVA        


      Collin J. D'SilvaD’Silva


        

      Chairman of the Board, Director and Chief Executive Officer (Principal
      (Principal Executive Officer)


      /s/    MICHAEL A. SUMMERS        


      WILLIAM P. RASMUSSEN      Michael A. Summers


      William P. Rasmussen


        

      Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer)


      /s/    
      GREGORYGREGORY J. DUMAN*DUMAN*        


      Gregory J. Duman


        

      Director


      /s/    JEFFREY SKLAR*        
      JEFFREY SKLAR*      


      Jeffrey Sklar M.D., Ph.D.


        

      Director


      /s/    
      ROLANDROLAND J. SANTONI*SANTONI*        


      Roland J. Santoni


        

      Director


      /s/    PARAG SAXENA*        
      PARAG SAXENA*      


      Parag Saxena


        

      Director


      /s/    GREGORY T. SLOMA*        


      Gregory T. Sloma

      Director

      *By Collin J. D'Silva,D’Silva, as attorney-in-fact
        

       


      /s/    
      COLLINCOLLIN J. D'SILVA      D’SILVA        


      Collin J. D'Silva
      D’Silva

      Attorney-in-fact for the individuals as indicated.



      50



      CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER

      I, Collin J. D'Silva, certify that:

        1.
        I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Transgenomic, Inc. (the Registrant);

        2.
        Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report;

        3.
        Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

        4.
        The Registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the Registrant and we have:

        a)
        Designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the Registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;

        b)
        Evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrant's disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this annual report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

        c)
        Presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

        5.
        The Registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the Registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the Registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

        a)
        all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the Registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the Registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

        b)
        any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Registrant's internal controls; and

        6.
        The Registrant's other certifying officer and I have indicated in this annual report whether there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

      Date: March 31, 2003  /s/COLLIN J. D'SILVA
      Collin J. D'Silva,Chief Executive Officer

      51



      CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER

      I, William P. Rasmussen, certify that:

        1.
        I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Transgenomic, Inc. (the Registrant);

        2.
        Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report;

        3.
        Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

        4.
        The Registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the Registrant and we have:

        a)
        Designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the Registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;

        b)
        Evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrant's disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this annual report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

        c)
        Presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

        5.
        The Registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the Registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the Registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

        a)
        all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the Registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the Registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

        b)
        any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Registrant's internal controls; and

        6.
        The Registrant's other certifying officer and I have indicated in this annual report whether there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

      Date: March 31, 2003  /s/WILLIAM P. RASMUSSEN
      William P. Rasmussen,Chief Financial Officer

      52




      QuickLinks
      Schedule II – Valuation And Qualifying Accounts

      Index
      PART I
      FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
      Part II
      INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT
      TRANSGENOMIC, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS As of December 31, 2002 and 2001 (In thousands except share and per share data)
      TRANSGENOMIC, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS Years Ended December 31, 2002, 2001 and 2000 (in thousands except share and per share data)
      TRANSGENOMIC, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY (DEFICIT) Years Ended December 31, 2002, 2001 and 2000 (in thousands except share data)
      TRANSGENOMIC INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS Years Ended December 31, 2002, 2001 and 2000 (In thousands)
      TRANSGENOMIC, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Years Ended December 31, 2002, 2001 and 2000 (Tabular amounts(dollars in thousands except share and per share data)thousands)
      Part III
      Part IV
      SIGNATURES
      CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER
      CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER

         Beginning
      Balance


        Additional
      Charges
      to Income


        Deductions
      from
      Reserve


        Ending
      Balance


      Allowance for Bad Debts:

                      

      Year Ended December 31, 2004

        $549  $534  $32  $1,051

      Year Ended December 31, 2003

        $450  $174  $75  $549

      Year Ended December 31, 2002

        $213  $418  $181  $450

      44