Table of Contents

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K

ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the fiscal year ended August 31, 20112012

Commission File Number: 1-9852

CHASE CORPORATION
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

26 Summer Street, Bridgewater, Massachusetts 02324
(Address of Principal Executive Offices, Including Zip Code)

(508) 819-4200
(Registrant's Telephone Number, Including Area Code)

Securities registered pursuant to section 12(b) of the Act:

         Securities registered pursuant to section 12(g) of the Act:None

         Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer (as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act). YES o    NO ý

         Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Exchange Act. YES o    NO ý

         Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months, and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. YES ý    NO o

         Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). YES oý    NO o

         Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. o

         Indicate by check markcheckmark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of "large accelerated filer", "accelerated filer" and "smaller reporting company" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

         Indicate by checkmark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). YES o    NO ý

         The aggregate market value of the common stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant, as of February 28, 201129, 2012 (the last business day of the registrant's second quarter of fiscal 2011)2012), was approximately $103,932,655.$92,953,599.

         As of October 31, 2011,2012, the Company had outstanding 8,953,5849,065,676 shares of common stock, $.10 par value, which is its only class of common stock.

Documents Incorporated By Reference:

         Portions of the registrant's definitive proxy statement for the Annual Meeting of Shareholders, which is expected to be filed within 120 days after the registrant's fiscal year ended August 31, 2011,2012, are incorporated by reference into Part III hereof.

Table of Contents

CHASE CORPORATION

INDEX TO ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K

For the Year Ended August 31, 20112012

Table of Contents

PART I

ITEM 1—BUSINESS

Primary Operating Divisions and Facilities and Industry Segment

        Chase Corporation (the "Company," "Chase," "we," or "us") is a leading manufacturer of protective materials for high reliability applications. Our strategy is to maximize the performance of our core businesses and brands while seeking future opportunities through strategic acquisitions. In the fourth quarter of our 2011 fiscal year, we reorganizedWe are organized into two operating segments, an Industrial Materials segment and a Construction Materials segment. The basis for our segmentation is distinguished by the nature of the products we manufacture and how they are delivered to their respective markets. The Industrial Materials segment represents our specified products which are used in or integrated into another company's product with demand dependent upon general economic conditions. The Construction Materials segment reflects our construction project oriented product offerings which are primarily sold and used as "Chase" branded products in final form. Our manufacturing facilities are distinct to their respective segments with the exception of our Pittsburgh,O'Hara Township, PA facility which produces products related to both operating segments. A summary of our operating structure as of August 31, 20112012 is as follows:

INDUSTRIAL MATERIALS SEGMENT

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS SEGMENT

Table of Contentsat our O'Hara Township, PA facility.

Table of Contents

Other Business Developments

Announced closingAcquisition of Randolph, MA manufacturing facilityNEPTCO Incorporated

        On October 5, 2011,June 27, 2012, we announced to our employeesacquired 100% of the planned closingcapital stock of our Randolph, MANEPTCO Incorporated ("NEPTCO") a private company based in Pawtucket, RI, whose core products are sold primarily into the broadband communications and electronics packaging industries. NEPTCO operates three manufacturing facility effective December 1, 2012. This is in line with our ongoing efforts to consolidate our manufacturing plants and streamline our existing processes. The manufacturing of products producedfacilities in the Randolph, MA facility will be transitionedUnited States and one in China, as well as utilizing distribution facilities in Rotterdam, Netherlands and Mississauga, Ontario to our other facilities overassist in supply chain management. As part of this transaction, we also acquired NEPTCO's 50% ownership stake in a joint venture. The purchase price for this acquisition, net of cash received, was $62,217,000, subject to the coursefinalization of a 15 month transition period. We estimate total pre-tax charges of approximately $700,000 associated with these facility closing activitiespurchase accounting, which will be recognized overis nearly complete pending the course of the transition period. Of this amount, severancefinal working capital true up and other employee related costs are estimated to be $550,000. We expect the transition to be substantially completed and the majority of these cash expenditures to be incurred in the first quarter of fiscal 2013.deferred tax positions.

Products and Markets

        Our principal products are specialty tapes, laminates, sealants and coatings that are sold by our salespeople, manufacturers' representatives and distributors. In our Industrial Materials segment, these products consist of:

(i)

insulating and conducting materials for the manufacture of electrical and telephone wire and cable, electrical splicing, and terminating and repair tapes, which are marketed to wire and cable manufacturers;



(ii)

laminated film foils, composite strength elements, anti-static packaging tape and pulling tapes for the electronics and cable industries;



(iii)

moisture protective coatings, which are sold to the electronics industry including circuitry used in automobiles and home appliances;



(iii)(iv)

laminated durable papers, including laminated paper with an inner security barrier used in personal and mail-stream privacy protection, which are sold primarily to the envelope converting and commercial printing industries;



(v)

pulling and detection tapes used in the installation, measurement and location of fiber optic cables, water and natural gas lines, and power, data, and video cables for commercial buildings;



(vi)

cover tapes with reliable adhesive and anti-static properties essential to delivering semiconductor components via tape and reel packaging; and



(iv)(vii)

flexible, compositesrigid and laminates for the wire & cable, aerospace, packagingsemi-rigid fiber optic strength elements designed to allow fiber optic cables to withstand mechanical and industrial laminate markets.environmental strain and stress, produced by NEPTCO's joint venture.

Table of Contents

        In our Construction Materials segment, these products consist of:

(i)

protective pipe coating tapes and other protectants for valves, regulators, casings, joints, metals, concrete and wood, which are sold to oil companies, gas utilities and pipeline companies;



(ii)

protectants for highway bridge deck metal supported surfaces, which are sold to municipal transportation authorities;



(iii)

fluid applied coating and lining systems for use in the water and wastewater industry; and



(iv)

expansion and control joint systems designed for roads, bridges, stadiums and airport runways.

        There is some seasonality with our product offerings sold into the construction market as increased demand is often experienced when temperatures are warmer (April through October) with less demand occurring when temperatures are colder (typically our second fiscal quarter). WeOther than the acquisition of NEPTCO, we did not introduce any new products or segments requiring an investment of a material amount of our assets during fiscal year 2011.2012.

Employees

        As of October 31, 2011,2012, we employed approximately 324719 people (including union employees). We consider our employee relations to be good. In the U.S., we offer our employees a wide array of company-paid benefits, which we believe are competitive relative to others in our industry. In our operations outside the U.S., we offer benefits that may vary from those offered to our U.S. employees due to customary local practices and statutory requirements.

Table of Contents

Backlog, Customers and Competition

        As of October 31, 2011,2012, the backlog of customer orders believed to be firm was approximately $9,599,000.$13,722,000. This compared with a total of $11,451,000$9,599,000 as of October 31, 2010.2011. The decreaseincrease in backlog over the prior year amount is primarily due to an overall decrease in order activity across our pipeline and construction product lines.the increased business resulting from the NEPTCO acquisition. The backlog of orders has some seasonality due to the construction season. During fiscal 2012, 2011 2010 and 2009,2010, no customer accounted for more than 10% of sales. No material portion of our business is subject to renegotiation or termination of profits or contracts at the election of the United States Federal Government.

        There are other companies that manufacture or sell products and services similar to those made and sold by us. Many of those companies are larger and have greater financial resources than we have. We compete principally on the basis of technical performance, service reliability, quality and price.

Raw Materials

        We obtain raw materials from a wide variety of suppliers with alternative sources of most essential materials available within reasonable lead times.

Patents, Trademarks, Licenses, Franchises and Concessions

        We own the following trademarks that we believe are of material importance to our business: Chase Corporation®, C-Spray (Logo), a trademark used in conjunction with most of the Company's business segment and product line marketing material and communications; HumiSeal®, a trademark for moisture protective coatings sold to the electronics industry; Chase & Sons® and Chase Facile®, trademarks for barrier and insulating tapes sold to the wire and cable industry; Chase BLH₂OCK®, a trademark for a water blocking compound sold to the wire and cable industry; Rosphalt50®, a trademark for an asphalt additive used predominantly on bridge decks for waterproofing protection; Insulfab®, a trademark for insulation material used in the aerospace industry; PaperTyger®, a trademark for laminated durable papers sold to the envelope converting and commercial printing industries; Tapecoat®, a trademark for corrosion preventative surface coatings and primers; Royston®, a trademark for corrosion inhibiting coating composition for use on pipes; Eva-Pox® and Ceva®, trademarks for epoxy pastes/gels/mortars and elastomeric concrete used in the construction industry; CIM® trademarks for fluid applied coating and lining systems used in the water and wastewater industry; and ServiWrap® trademarks for pipeline protection tapes, coatings and accessories.accessories; NEPTCO®, a trademark used in conjunction with most of NEPTCO's business and product line marketing material and communications; Muletape®, a trademark for pulling and installation tapes sold to the telecommunications industry; and Tracesafe®, a trademark for detection tapes sold to the water and gas industry. We do not have any other material trademarks, licenses, franchises, or concessions. While we do hold various patents, at this time, we do not believe that they are material to the success of our business.

Table of Contents

Working Capital

        We fund our business operations through a combination of available cash and cash equivalents, short-term investments and cash flows generated from operations. In addition, our revolving credit facility is available for additional working capital needs or investment opportunities.

Research and Development

        Approximately $2,958,000, $2,452,000 $1,748,000 and $1,632,000$1,748,000 was spent for Company-sponsored research and development during fiscal 2012, 2011 2010 and 2009,2010, respectively. Research and development increased by $704,000$506,000 in fiscal 20112012 primarily due to our continued product development efforts that are directed towards seizing new business opportunities for our established product lines.

Available Information

        Chase maintains a website athttp://www.chasecorp.com. Our annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K and amendments to such reports filed or furnished pursuant to section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as well as section 16 reports on Form 3, 4, or 5, are available free of charge on this site as soon as is reasonably practicable after they are filed or furnished with the SEC. Our Financial Code of Ethics and the charters for the Audit Committee, the Nominating and Governance Committee and the Compensation and Management Development Committee of our Board of Directors are also

Table of Contents

available on our Internet site. The Code of Ethics and charters are also available in print to any shareholder upon request. Requests for such documents should be directed to Paula Myers, Shareholder and Investor Relations Department, at 26 Summer Street, Bridgewater, Massachusetts 02324. Our Internet site and the information contained on it or connected to it are not part of or incorporated by reference into this Form 10-K. Our filings with the SEC are also available on the SEC's website athttp://www.sec.gov.

Financial Information About Segment and Geographic Areas

        Please see Notes 11 and 12 to the Company's Consolidated Financial Statements for financial information about the Company's operating segments and domestic and foreign operations for each of the last three fiscal years.

ITEM 1A—RISK FACTORS

        The following risk factors should be read carefully in connection with evaluating our business and the forward-looking information contained in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. We feel that any of the following risks could materially adversely affect our business, operations, industry, financial position or our future financial performance. While we believe that we have identified and discussed below the key risk factors affecting our business, there may be additional risks and uncertainties that are not presently known or that are not currently believed to be significant that may adversely affect our business, operations, industry, financial position and financial performance in the future.

We currently operate in mature markets where increases or decreases in market share could be significant.

        Our sales and net income are largely dependent on recurring sales from a consistent and well established customer base. Organic growth opportunities are minimal; however, we have used and will continue to use strategic acquisitions as a means to build and grow the business. In this business environment, increases or decreases in market share could have a material effect on our business condition or results of operation. We face intense competition from a diverse range of competitors, including operating divisions of companies much larger and with far greater resources than we have. If we are unable to maintain our market share, our business could suffer.

Our business strategy includes the pursuit of strategic acquisitions, which may not be successful if they happen at all.

        From time to time, we engage in discussions with potential target companies concerning potential acquisitions. In executing our acquisition strategy, we may be unable to identify suitable acquisition candidates. In addition, we

Table of Contents

may face competition from other companies for acquisition candidates, making it more difficult to acquire suitable companies on favorable terms.

        Even if we do identify a suitable acquisition target and are able to negotiate and close a transaction, the integration of an acquired business into our operations involves numerous risks, including potential difficulties in integrating an acquired company's product line with ours; the diversion of our resources and management's attention from other business concerns; the potential loss of key employees; limitations imposed by antitrust or merger control laws in the United States or other jurisdictions; risks associated with entering a new geographical or product market; and the day-to-day management of a larger and more diverse combined company. During the fiscal year ended August 31, 2012, for example, we completed the acquisition of NEPTCO Incorporated, which represents approximately 39% of our consolidated total assets as of the end of fiscal 2012, making it the largest acquisition in the Company's history.

        We may not realize the synergies, operating efficiencies, market position or revenue growth we anticipate from acquisitions and our failure to effectively manage the above risks and other problems associated with acquisitions could have a material adverse effect on our business, growth prospects and financial performance.

Our results of operations could be adversely affected by uncertain economic and political conditions and the effects of these conditions on our customers' businesses and levels of business activity.

        Global economic and political conditions can affect the businesses of our customers and the markets they serve. A severe or prolonged economic downturn or a negative or uncertain political climate could adversely affect

Table of Contents

the levels of business activity of our customers and the industries they serve, including the automotive, aerospace, housing, construction, pipeline, energy, transportation infrastructure and electronics industries. This may reduce demand for our products or depress pricing of those products, either of which may have a material adverse effect on our results of operations. Changes in global economic conditions could also shift demand to products for which we do not have competitive advantages, and this could negatively affect the amount of business that we are able to obtain. In addition, if we are unable to successfully anticipate changing economic and political conditions, we may be unable to effectively plan for and respond to those changes and our business could be negatively affected.

General economic factors, domestically and internationally, may also adversely affect our financial performance through increased raw material costs or other expenses and by making access to capital more difficult.

        The cumulative effect of higher interest rates, energy costs, inflation, levels of unemployment, healthcare costs, unsettled financial markets, and other economic factors could adversely affect our financial condition by increasing our manufacturing costs and other expenses at the same time that our customers may be scaling back demand for our products. Prices of certain commodity products, including oil and petroleum-based products, are historically volatile and are subject to fluctuations arising from changes in domestic and international supply and demand, labor costs, competition, weather events, market speculation, government regulations and periodic delays in delivery. Rapid and significant changes in commodity prices may affect our sales and profit margins. These factors can also increase our merchandise costs and/or selling, general and administrative expenses, and otherwise adversely affect our operations and results. Recent turmoil in the credit markets may limit our ability to access debt capital for use in acquisitions or other purposes on advantageous terms or at all. If we are unable to manage our expenses in response to general economic conditions and margin pressures, or if we are unable to obtain capital for strategic acquisitions or other needs, then our results of operations would be negatively affected.

Fluctuations in the supply and prices of raw materials may negatively impact our financial results.

        We obtain raw materials needed to manufacture our products from a number of suppliers. Many of these raw materials are petroleum-based derivatives. Under normal market conditions, these materials are generally available on the open market and from a variety of producers. From time to time, however, the prices and availability of these raw materials fluctuate, which could impair our ability to procure necessary materials, or increase the cost of manufacturing our products. If the prices of raw materials increase, and we are unable to pass these increases on to our customers, we could experience reduced profit margins.

If our products fail to perform as expected, or if we experience product recalls, we could incur significant and unexpected costs and lose existing and future business.

        Our products are complex and could have defects or errors presently unknown to us, which may give rise to claims against us, diminish our brands or divert our resources from other purposes. Despite testing, new and existing products could contain defects and errors and may in the future contain manufacturing or design defects, errors or performance problems when first introduced, or even after these products have been used by our customers for a period of time. These problems could result in expensive and time-consuming design modifications or warranty charges, changes to our manufacturing processes, product recalls, significant increases in our maintenance costs, or exposure to liability for damages, any of which may result in substantial and unexpected expenditures, require significant management attention, damage our reputation and customer relationships, and adversely affect our business, our operating results and our cash flow.

We are dependent on key personnel.

        We depend significantly on our executive officers including Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, Peter R. Chase, and on other key employees. The loss of the services of any of these key employees could have a material impact on our business and results of operations. In addition, our acquisition strategy will require that we attract, motivate and retain additional skilled and experienced personnel. The inability to satisfy such requirements could have a negative impact on our ability to remain competitive in the future.

Table of Contents

If we cannot successfully manage the unique challenges presented by international markets, we may not be successful in expanding our international operations.

        Our strategy includes expansion of our operations in existing and new international markets by selective acquisitions and strategic alliances. Our ability to successfully execute our strategy in international markets is affected by many of the same operational risks we face in expanding our U.S. operations. In addition, our international expansion may be adversely affected by our ability to identify and gain access to local suppliers as well as by local laws and customs, legal and regulatory constraints, political and economic conditions and currency regulations of the countries or regions in which we currently operate or intend to operate in the future. Risks inherent in our international operations also include, among others, the costs and difficulties of managing international operations, adverse tax consequences and greater difficulty in enforcing intellectual property rights. Additionally, foreign currency exchange rates and fluctuations may have an impact on future costs or on future cash flows from our international operations.

Our results of operations could be adversely affected by uncertain economic and political conditions and the effects of these conditions on our customers' businesses and levels of business activity.

        Global economic and political conditions can affect the businesses of our customers and the markets they serve. A severe or prolonged economic downturn or a negative or uncertain political climate could adversely affect the levels of business activity of our customers and the industries they serve, including the automotive, aerospace, housing, construction, pipeline, energy, transportation infrastructure and electronics industries. This may reduce demand for our products or depress pricing of those products, either of which may have a material adverse effect on our results of operations. Changes in global economic conditions could also shift demand to products for which we do not have competitive advantages, and this could negatively affect the amount of business that we are able to obtain. In addition, if we are unable to successfully anticipate changing economic and political conditions, we may be unable to effectively plan for and respond to those changes and our business could be negatively affected.

Financial market performance may have a material adverse effect on our pension plan assets and require additional funding requirements.

        Significant and sustained declines in the financial markets may have a material adverse effect on the fair market value of the assets of our pension plan assets.plans. While these pension plan assets are considered non-financial assets since they are not carried on our balance sheet, the fair market valuation of these assets could impact our funding requirements, funded status or net periodic pension cost. Any significant and sustained declines in the fair market value of these pension assets could require us to increase our funding requirements which would have an impact on our cash flow, and could also lead to additional pension expense.

We may experience difficulties in the redesign and consolidation of our manufacturing facilities which could impact shipments to customers, product quality, and our ability to realize cost savings.

        We currently have several ongoing projects to streamline our manufacturing operations, which include the redesign and consolidation of certain manufacturing facilities. We anticipate a reduction of overhead costs as a result of these projects, to the extent that we can effectively leverage assets, personnel, and operating processes in the transition of production between manufacturing facilities. However, uncertainty is inherent within the facility redesign and consolidation process, and unforeseen circumstances could offset the anticipated benefits, disrupt service to customers, and impact product quality.

Failure of an operating or information system or a compromise of security with respect to an operating or information system or portable electronic device could adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition or the effectiveness of our internal controls over operations and financial reporting.

        We are highly dependent on automated systems to record and process our daily transactions and certain other components of our financial statements. We could experience either a failure of one or more of these systems, or a compromise of our security due to technical system flaws, data input or record-keeping errors, or tampering or manipulation of our systems by employees or unauthorized third parties. Information security risks also exist with respect to the use of portable electronic devices, such as laptops and smartphones, which are particularly vulnerable to loss and theft. We may also be subject to disruptions of any of these systems arising from events that are wholly or partially beyond our control (for example, natural disasters, acts of terrorism, epidemics, computer

Table of Contents

viruses, and electrical/telecommunications outages). All of these risks are also applicable wherever we rely on outside vendors to provide services. Operating system failures, disruptions, or the compromise of security with respect to operating systems or portable electronic devices could subject us to liability claims, harm our reputation, interrupt our operations, or adversely affect our internal control over financial reporting, business, results from operations, financial condition or cash flow.

Changes in accounting standards and subjective assumptions, estimates and judgments by management related to complex accounting matters could significantly affect our financial results.

        Generally accepted accounting principles and related accounting pronouncements, implementation guidelines and interpretations with regard to a wide range of matters that are relevant to our business, such as revenue recognition, asset impairment, inventories, pensions valuation and tax matters, are highly complex and involve many subjective assumptions, estimates and judgments. Changes in these rules or their interpretation or changes in underlying assumptions, estimates, or judgments could significantly change our reported or expected financial performance or financial condition.

ITEM 1B—UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS

Not applicable

Table of Contents

ITEM 2—PROPERTIES

        We own and lease office and manufacturing properties as outlined in the table below.

        The above facilities range in age from new to about 100 years, are generally in good condition and, in the opinion of management, adequate and suitable for present operations. We also own equipment and machinery that is in good repair and, in the opinion of management, adequate and suitable for present operations. We could

Table of Contents

significantly add to our capacity by increasing shift operations. Availability of machine hours through additional shifts would provide expansion of current product volume without significant additional capital investment.

Table of Contents

ITEM 3—LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

        We are one of over 100 defendants in a lawsuit pending in Ohio which alleges personal injury from exposure to asbestos contained in certain Chase products. The case is captioned Marie Lou Scott, Executrix of the Estate of James T. Scott v. A-Best Products, et al., No. 312901 in the Court of Common Pleas for Cuyahoga County, Ohio. The plaintiff in the case issued discovery requests to us in August 2005, to which we timely responded in September 2005. The trial had initially been scheduled to begin on April 30, 2007. However, that date had been postponed and no new trial date has been set. As of October 2011,2012, there have been no new developments as this Ohio lawsuit has been inactive with respect to us.

        We were named as one of the defendants in a complaint filed on June 25, 2009, in a lawsuit captioned Lois Jansen, Individually and as Special Administrator of the Estate of Thomas Jansen v. Beazer East, Inc., et al., No: 09-CV-6248 in the Milwaukee County (Wisconsin) Circuit Court. The plaintiff alleges that her husband suffered and died from malignant mesothelioma resulting from exposure to asbestos in his workplace. The plaintiff has sued seven alleged manufacturers or distributors of asbestos-containing products, including Royston Laboratories (formerly an independent company and now a division of Chase Corporation). The other defendants have each either settled or had the complaint against them dismissed. We have filed an answer to the claim denying the material allegations in the complaint. The parties are currently engaged in discovery.discovery and motion practice.

        In addition to the matters described above, we are involved from time to time in litigation incidental to the conduct of our business. Although we do not expect that the outcome in any of these matters, individually or collectively, will have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, or results of operations or cashflows, litigation is inherently unpredictable. Therefore, judgments could be rendered or settlements entered, that could adversely affect our operating results or cash flows in a particular period. We routinely assess all of our litigation and threatened litigation as to the probability of ultimately incurring a liability, and record our best estimate of the ultimate loss in situations where we assess the likelihood of loss as probable.

ITEM 4—[REMOVED AND RESERVED]MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES

        Not applicable.

ITEM 4A—EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT

        The following table sets forth information concerning our Executive Officers as of August 31, 2011.2012. Each of our Executive Officers is selected by our Board of Directors and holds office until his successor is elected and qualified.

Table of Contents

PART II

ITEM 5—MARKET FOR THE REGISTRANT'S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES

        Our common stock is traded on the NYSE AmexMKT under the symbol CCF. As of October 31, 2011,2012, there were 443423 shareholders of record of our Common Stock and we believe that there were approximately 3,0372,863 beneficial shareholders who held shares in nominee name. On that date, the closing price of our common stock was $14.00$18.43 per share as reported by the NYSE Amex.MKT.

        The following table sets forth the high and low daily sales prices for our common stock as reported by the NYSE AmexMKT for each quarter in the fiscal years ended August 31, 20112012 and 2010:2011:

        Single annual cash dividend payments were declared and paid subsequent to year end in the amounts of $0.35,$0.40, $0.35, and $0.20$0.35 per common share, for the years ended August 31, 2012, 2011 2010 and 2009,2010, respectively. Certain of our borrowing facilities of ours contain financial covenants which may have the effect of limiting the amount of dividends that we can pay.

Comparative Stock Performance

        The following line graph compares the yearly percentage change in our cumulative total shareholder return on the Common Stock for the last five fiscal years with the cumulative total return on the Standard & Poor's 500 Stock Index (the "S&P 500 Index"), and a composite peer index that is weighted by market equity capitalization (the "Peer Group Index"). The companies included in the Peer Group Index are American Biltrite Inc., Material Sciences Corporation, H.B. Fuller Company, Quaker Chemical Corporation and RPM International, Inc. Cumulative total returns are calculated assuming that $100 was invested on August 31, 20062007 in each of the Common Stock, the S&P 500 Index and the Peer Group Index, and that all dividends were reinvested.

Comparison of 5 Year Cumulative Total Return
Assumes Initial Investment of $100 on August 31, 2006

        The information under the caption "Comparative Stock Performance" above is not deemed to be "filed" as part of this Annual Report, and is not subject to the liability provisions of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Such information will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing we make under the Securities Act of 1933 unless we explicitly incorporate it into such a filing at the time.

Table of Contents

ITEM 6—SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA

        The following selected financial data should be read in conjunction with "Item 7—Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" and "Item 8—Financial Statements and Supplementary Data."

        As further detailed in Note 1516 to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in this Report, the Electronic Manufacturing Services business was sold in June 2010 and the financial results of this previously reported segment are classified as discontinued operations. We have reflected the results of this business as discontinued operations in the consolidated statement of operations for all periods presented.

Table of Contents

ITEM 7—MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

        The following discussion provides an analysis of our financial condition and results of operations and should be read in conjunction with the Consolidated Financial Statements and notes thereto included in Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Selected Relationships within the Consolidated Statements of Operations

Recent Developments

        On June 27, 2012, we acquired 100% of the capital stock of NEPTCO Incorporated ("NEPTCO") a private company based in Pawtucket, RI, whose core products are sold primarily into the broadband communications and electronics packaging industries. NEPTCO operates three manufacturing facilities in the United States and one in China, as well as utilizing distribution facilities in Rotterdam, Netherlands and Mississauga, Ontario to assist in supply chain management. As part of this transaction, we also acquired NEPTCO's 50% ownership stake in a joint venture. The purchase price for the acquisition, net of cash received, was $62,217,000, subject to the finalization of purchase accounting, which is nearly complete pending the final working capital true up and deferred tax positions.

Overview

        Greater demandWe completed the largest acquisition in the industrial controls, automotiveCompany's history in June 2012. That coupled with continued strong demand for our wire and electrical cable markets resulted in increased revenues from continuing operations for fiscal 2011. Despite these increased revenues, the rising cost of raw materials, including petroleum related goods, had a direct impact on the profitability of our core product lines and net income from continuing operations increased slightly from the prior year. We continue to monitor raw material prices closely and implement sales price increases where possible, but the volatility of the cost of these raw materials remains uncertain. Revenues from our Industrial Materials segment exceeded prior year results dueproducts contributed to increased sales from our wire & cable and electronic coatings product lines. We completed our plant move from Webster, MA to Oxford, MA ahead of schedule this past year, and recently announced the next phase of our consolidation plan, closing the Randolph, MA facility over the next twelve to fifteen months. Additionally, in the first half of fiscal 2012, we will be transitioning our HumiSeal Europe LTD manufacturing operations from Camberley, UK to a modern facility in Winnersh, UK.

        Revenues from our Construction Materials segment wererevenues. Net income fell below prior year results due to poor market conditions in the construction and building sectors, which had a direct impact on sales of our private label products. This segment was also impacted this past year by some production issues at our Rye, UK facility primarily due to challenges in meeting heavy Middle East demand for pipeline products. These issues were rectified by process improvements implemented in the fourth quarter, but they resulted in higherexpenses related to our acquisition of NEPTCO as well as defined benefit pension settlement costs and decreased productioncontinued plant transition expenses related to our Randolph plant closing. Adjusting for these noted expenses, net income for the year exceeded prior year results. Increased revenue from the Industrial Materials

Table of Contents

that facility. We will continuesegment was due to monitor our production processesacquisition of NEPTCO which contributed $14.8 million in fiscal 2012 as well as increased sales of our wire and cable products and greater demand for our laminated paper products. These increased revenues in fiscal 2012 were partially offset by decreased sales in our aerospace and transportation product markets. Additionally, the European Union economy continues to ensure that we deliver high quality goodshave a negative impact on the results of our European operations.

        Revenues from our Construction Materials segment surpassed the prior year primarily due to meet market needssales of our pipeline products as they arise.well as increased sales of highway construction products over the final half of the fiscal year. Additionally, there was increased demand from our key private label customers in fiscal 2012 over the prior fiscal year.

        In the upcoming fiscal year, our key objectives will include continuous efficiency improvements, long term consolidationcontinue to be focused on our marketing and investment in R&D efforts, and marketing as this long-term commitment is expectedintegrating the recently acquired NEPTCO operations. We will also be completing the move of our Randolph operations to pay off in new productsour Oxford and increased business in future years.Blawnox manufacturing plants. Our balance sheet continues to remain strong, with cash on hand of $15.0$15.2 million and a current ratio of 2.9. Although2.8. Our $15 million line of credit is fully available, while the current economic climate remains uncertain, we remain focused on our long term strategic goals. The balance of our unsecured term debt is currently $12.7$70 million. This term debt was used to finance our acquisitions in fiscal 2010. Our $10 million line of credit is fully available.

        The Company has two reportable segments summarized below:

        As further detailed in Note 15 to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in this Report, the Electronic Manufacturing Services business was sold in June 2010 and the financial results of this previously reported segment are classified as discontinued operations. We have reflected the results of this business as discontinued operations in the consolidated statement of operations for all periods presented.

Table of Contents

Results of Operations

Revenues and Operating Profit by Segment are as follows:

(a)

Includes $828 of expenses related to inventory step up in fair value as part of the NEPTCO acquisition, and idle facility costs of $270 from our Paterson, NJ and Webster, MA facilities

(b)

Includes $3,206 in acquisition related expenses

(c)

Includes idle facility costs of $706 from our Paterson, NJ and Oxford, MA facilities

(b)(d)

Includes idle facility costs of $392 from our Paterson, NJ and Oxford, MA facilities

(c)(e)

Includes loss on impairment of goodwill of $237

(d)

Includes loss on impairment of assets of $262$434 in acquisition related expenses

Total Revenues

        Total revenues in fiscal 2012 increased $25,879,000 or 21% to $148,919,000 from $123,040,000 in the prior year. Revenues in our Industrial Materials segment increased $20,244,000 or 27% to $95,988,000 for the year ended August 31, 2012 compared to $75,744,000 in fiscal 2011. The increase in revenues from our Industrial Materials segment in fiscal 2012 was primarily due to: (a) sales of $14,826,000 from NEPTCO operations which we acquired in June 2012; (b) increased sales of $4,912,000 from our wire & cable product line as we continue to benefit from strong demand in the power cable and communication cable markets; and (c) increased sales of $1,492,000 from our laminated durable paper products. These increases were partially offset by decreased sales in the aerospace and transportation market of $1,948,000.

        Revenues from our Construction Materials segment increased $5,635,000 or 12% to $52,931,000 for the year ended August 31, 2012 compared to $47,296,000 for fiscal 2011. The increased sales from our Construction Materials segment in fiscal 2012 was primarily due to increased sales of: (a) $2,923,000 from our pipeline products due to greater demand for products produced at our UK facility; (b) $1,805,000 from our highway construction products; and (c) $767,000 from our private label products due to increased demand from some of our key customers.

Table of Contents

        Royalties and commissions in the Industrial Materials segment were $2,425,000, $2,122,000 and $1,664,000 for the years ended August 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010, respectively. The increase in royalties and commissions in fiscal 2012 over the prior two fiscal years was due to increased sales of electronic coatings by our licensed manufacturer in Asia.

        Export sales from domestic operations to unaffiliated third parties were $21,204,000, $19,715,000 and $17,946,000 for the years ended August 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010, respectively. The growth in our export sales in fiscal 2012 was due to $3,328,000 in export sales from our recent NEPTCO acquisition.

        Total revenues in fiscal 2011 increased $4,297,000 or 4% to $123,040,000 from $118,743,000 in the prior year. Revenues in our Industrial Materials segment increased $11,099,000 or 17% to $75,744,000 for the year ended August 31, 2011 compared to $64,645,000 in fiscal 2010. The increase in revenues from our Industrial Materials segment in fiscal 2011 was primarily due to increased sales of: (a) $6,967,000 from our wire & cable product line as we benefitted from increased demand in the electrical cable market; (b) $2,219,000 in the electronic coatings product line, primarily due to increased demand in the industrial controls and automotive markets; and (c) $1,793,000 from our custom products product lines.

Revenues from our Construction Materials segment decreased $6,802,000 or 13% to $47,296,000 for the year ended August 31, 2011 compared to $54,098,000 for fiscal 2010. The reduced sales from our Construction Materials segment in fiscal 2011 waswere primarily due to decreased sales of: (a) $4,603,000 from our private label products due to less demand for these products; (b) $1,230,000 from pipeline products produced at our UK facility as we experienced production challenges in meeting heavy Middle East demand in the latter half of fiscal 2011; and (c) $999,000 from our construction product lines as a result of decreased demand in the transportation and architectural markets.

        Royalties and commissions in the Industrial Materials segment were $2,122,000, $1,664,000 and $1,077,000 for the years ended August 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009, respectively. The increase in royalties and

Table of Contents

commissions in fiscal 2011 over the prior two fiscal years was due to increased sales of electronic coatings by our licensed manufacturer in Asia.

        Export sales from domestic operations to unaffiliated third parties were $19,715,000, $17,946,000 and $14,611,000 for the years ended August 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009, respectively. The growth in our export sales in fiscal 2011 was primarily due to increased demand from our foreign customers in the aerospace and wire & cable markets.

        Total revenues in fiscal 2010 increased $27,507,000 or 30% to $118,743,000 from $91,236,000 in fiscal 2009. Revenues in our Industrial Materials segment increased $3,967,000 or 7% to $64,645,000 for the year ended August 31, 2010 compared to $60,678,000 in fiscal 2009. The increase in revenues from our Industrial Materials segment in fiscal 2010 was primarily due to increased sales of $6,672,000 in the electronic coatings product line from both the worldwide automotive sector and protective products used in domestic infrastructure applications. This increase was partially offset by decreased sales of $2,947,000 from our custom products product lines primarily due to decreased demand in the transportation market. Revenues from our Construction Materials segment increased $23,540,000 or 77% to $54,098,000 for the year ended August 31, 2010 compared to $30,558,000 for fiscal 2009. The increase in revenues from our Construction Materials segment in fiscal 2010 was primarily due to increased sales of: (a) $12,354,000 from CIM which we acquired in September 2009; (b) $4,991,000 from ServiWrap which was acquired in December 2009; (c) $3,354,000 from our pipeline and construction product lines; and (d) $2,793,000 from our private label products due to increased demand for these products.

Cost of Products and Services Sold

        Cost of products and services sold increased $5,489,000$20,932,000 or 7%26% to $80,317,000$101,249,000 for the fiscal year ended August 31, 2012 compared to $80,317,000 in fiscal 2011. As a percentage of revenues, cost of products and services sold increased to 68% in fiscal 2012 compared to 65% for fiscal 2011.

        The following table summarizes the relative percentages of costs of products and services sold to revenues for both of our operating segments:

        Cost of products and services sold in our Industrial Materials segment was $64,539,000 for the fiscal year ended August 31, 2012 compared to $48,474,000 in fiscal 2011. As a percentage of revenues, cost of products and services sold in this segment increased due to the following items: (a) expense of $828,000 due to the fair value inventory step up related to the NEPTCO acquisition; (b) moving expenses of $324,000 related to our plant transition from Webster to Oxford and Camberley to Winnersh; (c) accrued transition costs of $550,000 related to our move from our Randolph plant; and (d) certain supplier inconsistencies that resulted in excess waste and incremental expenses of $345,000 related to the utilization of specialized testing facilities for analyzing incoming raw materials for proper specifications.

        Cost of products and services sold in our Construction Materials segment was $36,710,000 for the fiscal year ended August 31, 2012 compared to $31,843,000 in fiscal 2011. As a percentage of revenues, cost of products and services sold in the Construction Materials segment increased primarily due to higher raw material costs, increased sales of lower margin products, and decreased sales of higher margin products.

        In fiscal 2011, cost of products and services sold increased $5,489,000 or 7% to $80,317,000 compared to $74,828,000 in the prior fiscal 2010.year. As a percentage of revenues, cost of products and services sold increased to 65% in fiscal 2011 compared to 63% for fiscal 2010.

        The following table summarizes the relative percentages of costs of products and services sold to revenues for both of our reporting segments:

Cost of products and services sold in our Industrial Materials segment waswere $48,474,000 for the fiscal year ended August 31, 2011 compared to $39,340,000 in fiscal 2010. As aThe percentage of revenues increase in the cost of products and services sold infor the Industrial Materials segment increasedwas primarily due to rising prices in certain commodity and petroleum based raw materials impacting many of our

Table of Contents

product lines throughout the year. Additionally, we incurred incremental one-time expenses in the latter half of fiscal 2011 related to the transition of our Webster, MA production processes over to the Oxford, MA facility. While we continue to face challenges with margin pressures across many of our key product lines, we anticipate a favorable future impact as a result of this transition.

Cost of products and services sold in our Construction Materials segment waswere $31,843,000 for the fiscal year ended August 31, 2011 compared to $35,488,000 in fiscal 2010. As a percentage of revenues,The increase in cost of products and services sold as a percentage of revenues in the Construction Materials segment increasedduring fiscal 2011 was primarily due to higher raw material costs which were partially offset by increased sales of our higher margin products and the resulting lower share of total sales that were made up of lower margin products.

        In fiscal 2010, cost of products and services sold increased $12,567,000 or 20% to $74,828,000 compared to $62,261,000 in the prior fiscal year. As a percentage of revenues, cost of products and services sold decreased to 63% in fiscal 2010 compared to 68% for fiscal 2009. Cost of products and services sold in our Industrial Materials segment were $39,340,000 for the fiscal year ended August 31, 2010 compared to $40,162,000 in fiscal 2009. The percentage of revenues decrease in the cost of products and services sold for the Industrial Materials segment was primarily due to increased sales of higher margin products, management's ability to leverage its fixed overhead costs on a higher revenue base, and the favorable impact of ongoing cost reduction efforts. Cost

Table of Contents

of products and services sold in our Construction Materials segment were $35,488,000 for the fiscal year ended August 31, 2010 compared to $22,099,000 in fiscal 2009. The large dollar value increase in cost of products and services sold in this Construction Materials segment during fiscal 2010 was primarily attributable to the fiscal 2010 acquisitions of the CIM business and the Serviwrap product lines. The decrease in cost of products and services sold as a percentage of revenues in this segment during fiscal 2010 was a direct result of a favorable product mix coupled with continued focus and scrutiny on material purchases that helped stabilize margins on many of our key product lines.

Selling, General and Administrative Expenses

        Selling, general and administrative expenses decreased $371,000increased $3,392,000 or 1%13% to $30,172,000 during fiscal 2012 compared to $26,780,000 duringin fiscal 2011. As a percentage of revenues, selling, general and administrative expenses decreased to 21% in fiscal 2012 compared to 22% for fiscal 2011. The percentage decrease is attributable to our continued emphasis on controlling costs and leveraging fixed overhead.

        During fiscal 2011, selling, general and administrative expenses increased $63,000 to $26,780,000, compared to $27,151,000$26,717,000 in fiscal 2010. As a percentage of revenues, selling, general and administrative expenses decreased to 22% in fiscal 2011 compared to 23% for fiscal 2010. This decrease was primarily due to acquisition costs of $434,000 incurred in fiscal 2010 and lower stock based compensation expense in fiscal 2011. These were2011 as compared to fiscal 2010. This decrease was partially offset by increased research and development, sales commissions and other selling related expenses resulting from increased revenues in the current year.fiscal 2011.

        DuringIn fiscal 2010, selling, general and administrative expenses2012, bad debt expense, net of recoveries, increased $6,337,000$28,000 or 30%22% to $27,151,000,$155,000, compared to $20,814,000$127,000 in fiscal 2009. As a percentage of revenues, selling, general and administrative expenses remained flat at 23% in both fiscal 2010 and 2009.2011. The dollar increase in bad debt expense in fiscal 20102012 was primarily attributabledue to incremental expenses from the CIM and ServiWrap acquisitions, including acquisition costsfinancial difficulties for some of $434,000 and amortization of intangible assets of $1,170,000. Additionally,our international customers as well as overall increased revenues and profitability in fiscal 2010 comparedreceivable balances due to the prior year led to increased sales commissions and other selling related expenses and increased incentive compensation expense. These increases were partially offset by management's continued emphasis on controlling costs, including reduced travel and external consulting costs.

        Inhigher sales. During fiscal 2011, bad debt expense, net of recoveries, decreased $51,000 or 29% to $127,000, compared to $178,000 in fiscal 2010. The improvement in fiscal 2011 was a result ofWe continue with our strict adherence to our established credit policies as well asand continue to closely monitoringmonitor the accounts receivable function andwhile taking a proactive approach to the collections process. Bad debt expense, net of recoveries, increased $219,000 to $178,000 in fiscal 2010 compared to a net gain of $41,000 in fiscal 2009 that was due to recoveries of previously identified bad debt that exceeded additions to bad debt expense for the fiscal year. The increase in bad debt expense in fiscal 2010 was primarily due to financial difficulties for several of our customers as well as overall increased receivable balances due to higher sales.

Loss on Impairment of Fixed AssetsAcquisition related costs

        In fiscal 2009,2012, we recorded a $262,000 chargeincurred $3,206,000 of acquisition costs related to the impairmentour acquisition of real property (land and building) located in West Bridgewater, MA whichNEPTCO. This acquisition was being leased to Sunburst Electronics Manufacturing Solutions, Inc. The real property, havingaccounted for as a pre-impairment book value of $1,632,000, was written down to its fair value of $1,370,000, which was realized upon the June 2009 sale of the property.

Loss on Impairment of Goodwill

        In fiscal 2009, based on the decrease in sales activity in the fiscal year and the completion of the fiscal 2010 budget, we determined that the carrying value of goodwill associated with our Northeast Quality Products ("NEQP") division may not be recoverable. Accordingly, we performed a goodwill impairment analysis. Based on the present value of future cash flows utilizing projected results for the balance of fiscal year 2009 and projections for future years based on the fiscal year 2010 budgeting process, the goodwill impairment analysis yielded results that did not support the current book value of the goodwill associated with this division. As a result, we concluded that the carrying amount of goodwill for the NEQP division was not fully recoverable and an impairment charge of $237,000 was recorded as of May 31, 2009. Goodwill related to NEQP, having a pre-impairment book value of $349,000, was written down to its fair value of $112,000business combination in accordance with generally acceptedthe appropriate accounting principles. The NEQP division was sold onstandards, as such all related professional service fees (i.e., banking, legal, accounting, actuarial, etc.) were expensed as they were incurred during the year ended August 14, 2009,31, 2012. In fiscal 2010, we incurred $434,000 of acquisition costs related to our acquisitions of CIM and the adjusted fair value of $112,000 was realized upon the sale.ServiWrap.

Interest Expense

        Interest expense increased $202,000 to $398,000 in fiscal 2012 compared to $196,000 in fiscal 2011. The increase in interest expense in fiscal 2012 compared to fiscal 2011 is a direct result of the $70,000,000 term note related to the acquisition of NEPTCO. Interest expense decreased $164,000 to $196,000 in fiscal 2011 compared to $360,000 in fiscal 2010. The decrease in interest expense in fiscal 2011 compared to the prior fiscal year iswas primarily due to the capitalization of

Table of Contents

imputed interest on construction in process projects related to our Oxford, MA and Pittsburgh,Blawnox, PA facilities. Interest expense increased $343,000 to $360,000 in fiscal 2010 compared to $17,000 in fiscal 2009. The increase in interest expense in fiscal 2010 compared to fiscal 2009 is a direct result of the $10,000,000 term note and $3,000,000 promissory notes related to the acquisition of CIM, and the $7,000,000 term loan related to the acquisition of ServiWrap.

Other Income

        Other income increased $374,000decreased $324,000 to $102,000 in fiscal 2012 compared to $426,000 in fiscal 2011 compared to $52,000 in fiscal 2010.2011. Other income (expense) primarily includes interest income and foreign exchange gains and losses caused by changes in exchange rates on transactions or balances denominated in currencies other than the functional currency of our subsidiaries. In fiscal 2012, other income includes a gain of $425,000 recognized on deposit payments previously received on the sale of our Evanston, IL property. We took back control and ownership of this leased asset which was previously sold by us under a seller financing arrangement (see Note 3 to the consolidated financial statements). The increase in other income is partially offset by the foreign exchange losses caused by the continued weakening of both the sterling and euro.

        Other income increased $374,000 to $426,000 in fiscal 2011 compared to $52,000 in fiscal 2010. The increase in other income in fiscal 2011 from the prior year iswas primarily due to foreign exchange gains (losses)

Table of Contents

caused by the volatility of the pound sterling and the euro, and the subsequent revaluation of some of our European sales transactions completed in other functional currencies (and subsequently translated to the pound sterling and the euro). Other income decreased $406,000 to $52,000 in fiscal 2010 compared to $458,000 in fiscal 2009. The decrease in other income in fiscal 2010 from the prior year is primarily due to the fiscal 2009 inclusion of rental income that we received from real property sold in June 2009.

Income Taxes

        The effective tax rate for fiscal 20112012 was 32.4%33.8% compared to 34.8%32.4% and 34.4%34.8% in fiscal 20102011 and 2009,2010, respectively. In all three years, we have received the benefit of the domestic production deduction and foreign rate differential. The increased effective tax rate in fiscal 2012 is primarily due to non-deductible acquisition related expenses offset by a continued favorable effective state income tax rate. The effective tax rate of 32.4% for fiscal 2011 compares favorably to 2010 due to an increase in the applicable domestic production deduction for the year to 9% (increased from 6% in fiscal 2010) and a more favorable effective state income tax rate in 2011.

Non-controlling Interest

        The increase in the effective tax rate in fiscal 2010 as compared to fiscal 2009 is primarily dueincome (loss) from non-controlling interest relates to a less favorable foreign tax rate differentialjoint venture in which we have, through our NEPTCO subsidiary, a 50% ownership stake. The joint venture, between NEPTCO and research credit in fiscal 2010 as comparedthe joint venture partner (an otherwise unrelated party), is managed and operated on a day-to-day basis by NEPTCO. The purpose of this joint venture was to fiscal 2009.combine the elements of each member's fiber optic strength businesses.

Net Income

        Consolidated net income in fiscal 2012 decreased $1,593,000 or 15% to $9,338,000 compared to $10,931,000 in fiscal 2011. The decrease in consolidated net income in fiscal 2012 was a result of the following factors: (a) $3,206,000 in acquisition related expenses; (b) expenses of $828,000 in inventory fair value step up related to the NEPTCO acquisition; and (c) acceleration of defined benefit plan settlement costs of $550,000 resulting from the timing of lump sum distributions to participants. In addition, there was an increase in plant transition and moving expenses of $874,000 during fiscal 2012.

        Consolidated net income in fiscal 2011 decreased $1,585,000 or 13% to $10,931,000 compared to $12,516,000 in fiscal 2010. Income from continuing operations increased $205,000 or 2% to $10,931,000 for the year ended August 31, 2011 compared to $10,726,000 in fiscal 2010. The increase in net income from continuing operations in fiscal 2011 was a result of increased revenues offset by increased raw material costs. Income from discontinued operations of $1,790,000 for the year ended August 31, 2010 was from our Chase EMS business which was sold in June 2010.

        ConsolidatedOther Important Performance Measures

        We believe that adjusted net income is a useful performance measure and is used by our executive management team and board of directors as a measure of operating performance, to allocate resources to enhance the financial performance of our business, to evaluate the effectiveness of our business strategies and in fiscal 2010 increased $6,131,000communications with our board of directors and investors concerning our financial performance. Adjusted net income is a non-GAAP financial measure.

        We define adjusted net income as follows: net income attributable to Chase Corporation before costs related to our acquisitions, expenses related to inventory step-up to fair value, and settlement (gains) or 96%losses resulting from lump sum distributions to $12,516,000 comparedparticipants from our defined benefit plan. Our definition of adjusted net income includes the current tax expense/(benefit) that would be payable/(realized) on our income tax return.

        The use of adjusted net income has limitations and this performance measure should not be considered in isolation from, or as an alternative to, $6,385,000U.S. GAAP measures such as net income.

Table of Contents

        The following unaudited table provides a reconciliation of net income attributable to Chase Corporation, the most directly comparable financial measure presented in fiscal 2009. Income from continuing operations increased $5,411,000 or 102%accordance with U.S. GAAP, to $10,726,000adjusted net income for the year ended August 31, 2010 comparedperiods presented:

Liquidity and Sources of Capital

        Our overall cash balance increased $198,000 to $15,180,000 at August 31, 2012 from $14,982,000 at August 31, 2011. The increased cash balance at August 31, 2012 was a result of cash flows generated from operations during the fiscal year and $7,268,000 in cash acquired as part of the NEPTCO acquisition, offset by principal payments on outstanding debt, equipment purchases, and payment of our annual dividend. Our overall cash balance decreased $2,358,000 to $14,982,000 at August 31, 2011 from $17,340,000 at August 31, 2010. The decreased cash balance at August 31, 2011 was a result of cash on hand used for strategic purchases of key raw materials, payment of our annual dividend in December 2010, debt repayments and purchases of machinery and equipment including improvements made to our Oxford, MA facility. These cash outflows were partially offset by cash generated from operations during the fiscal 2011 year. Our overall cash balance increased $5,697,000 to $17,340,000 at August 31, 2010 from $11,643,000 at August 31, 2009. The increased cash balance at August 31, 2010 was a result of the June 2010 sale of our Electronic Manufacturing Services business as well as cash flows generated from operations during the year, offset by cash used for acquisitions.

        Cash flow provided by operations was $9,303,000$13,946,000 for the year ended August 31, 20112012 compared to $9,303,000 in fiscal 2011 and $11,346,000 in fiscal 20102010. Cash provided by operations during fiscal 2012 was primarily due to operating income and $16,877,000 in fiscal 2009.decreased inventory as a result of higher sales volumes, offset by decreased accounts payable and increased accounts receivable balances. Cash provided by operations during fiscal 2011 was

Table of Contents

primarily due to operating income offset by increased purchases of inventory, as we strategically built up our inventory to facilitate certain manufacturing plant transition plans as well as making bulk purchases of key raw materials to take advantage of favorable pricing terms. Cash provided by operations during fiscal 2010 was primarily due to operating income and decreasedincreased accounts payable and accrued expense balances, offset by increased accounts receivable and inventory balances. Cash provided by operations during fiscal 2009 was primarily due to operating income and decreased accounts receivable and inventory balances, offset by reduced accounts payable balances.

        The ratio of current assets to current liabilities was 2.8 as of August 31, 2012 compared to 2.9 as of August 31, 2011 compared to 2.6 as of August 31, 2010.2011. The increasedecrease in our current ratio at August 31, 20112012 was primarily attributable to the increasesincrease in our raw material and finished goods inventories as wellthe current debt as a decrease in our accrued income taxes, which were partially offset by an overall decrease in our cash balance as noted above.result of the NEPTCO acquisition.

        Cash flow used in investing activities was $4,172,000$67,090,000 for the year ended August 31, 20112012 compared to $4,172,000 in fiscal 2011 and $17,329,000 in fiscal 20102010. During fiscal 2012, cash used in investing activities was primarily due to payments totaling $62,217,000, net of cash acquired, for the acquisition of NEPTCO and $5,204,000 in fiscal 2009.$5,256,000 paid for purchases of machinery and equipment at our manufacturing locations. During fiscal 2011, cash flow used in investing activities was primarily due to $1,930,000 paid for machinery and equipment and improvements made for our Oxford, MA facility, $827,000 paid for machinery and equipment and improvements made for our facility in O'Hara Township, PA, $605,000 paid related to the build out of our newly leased property in Winnersh, UK, and cash paid for purchases of machinery and equipment at our other manufacturing locations.

Table of Contents

These cash outflows were partially offset by additional proceeds during fiscal 2011 of $1,478,000 received from the sale of our Chase EMS business. During fiscal 2010, cash flow used in investing activities was primarily due to payments totaling $25,592,000 for the acquisitions of CIM and ServiWrap, and $3,572,000 paid for purchases of machinery and equipment at our other manufacturing locations during fiscal 2010.locations. This was partially offset by the $12,689,000 of net proceeds received from the sale of our discontinued operations. During fiscal 2009, cash flow used in investing activities was primarily due to $2,509,000 used to pay for the purchase of real property in Oxford, MA, $1,280,000 paid for purchases related to the build out of our manufacturing facility in Pittsburgh, PA, and purchases of machinery and equipment at our other manufacturing locations.

        Cash flow used inprovided by financing activities was $7,729,000$53,508,000 for the year ended August 31, 2011 as2012 compared to cash flowused in financing activities of $7,729,000 in fiscal 2011 and cash provided by financing activities of $11,664,000 in fiscal 2010 and2010. During fiscal 2012, cash flow used inprovided by financing activities resulted from $70,000,000 in term debt used to finance our acquisition of $3,856,000NEPTCO, offset by payments of $10,667,000 to retire our previously held term notes with Bank of America and RBS Citizens, payments on our line of credit arrangement, as well as payment of our annual dividend. Additionally, we paid the final two scheduled promissory note payments of $1,000,000 each to the CIM shareholders in fiscal 2009.accordance with the CIM stock purchase agreement, described in more detail below. During fiscal 2011, cash flow used in financing activities reflected our annual dividend payment and payments made on the bank loans we used to finance our prior year acquisitions of CIM and ServiWrap. Additionally, we paid the first of three scheduled promissory note payments of $1,000,000 to the CIM shareholders in accordance with the CIM stock purchase agreement, described in more detail below.agreement. During fiscal 2010, cash flow provided by financing activities primarily resulted from a total of $17,000,000 in term debt used to finance our acquisitions of CIM and ServiWrap. These were partially offset by payments made on the acquisition loans and our line of credit arrangement, as well as our annual dividend. During fiscal 2009, cash flow used in financing activities reflected the payment of the annual dividend and payments of statutory minimum taxes on restricted stock.

        On October 14, 2010, we announced a cash dividend of $0.35 per share (totaling $3,131,000), comprised of $0.30 related to earnings from continuing operations and $0.05 related to earnings from discontinued operations, to shareholders of record on October 31, 2010 and paid on December 3, 2010.

        On October 13, 2011, we announced a cash dividend of $0.35 per share (totaling approximately $3,134,000)$3,165,000), to shareholders of record on October 31, 2011 and payable on December 5, 2011.

        We continueOn October 23, 2012, we announced a cash dividend of $0.40 per share (totaling approximately $3,601,000), to have long-term unsecured credit available up to $10,000,000 with Bankshareholders of America at the bank's base lending rate or, at the option of the Company, at the effective London Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR) plus 150 basis points. On June 8, 2010, we executed an amendment to this credit facility, extending its maturity to March 31, 2013. As part of this amendment, the interest rate was increased by 25 basis points, from its original rate of LIBOR plus 125 basis points. All other terms of the credit facility remain the same. As of August 31, 2011 and October 31, 2011, the entire amount of $10,000,000 was available for use. We plan to use this availability to help finance our cash needs, including potential acquisitions, in fiscalrecord on November 2, 2012 and future periods.

        Under the terms of our credit facility, we must comply with certain debt covenants related to (a) the ratio of total liabilities to tangible net worth and (b) the ratio of operating cash flow to debt servicepayable on a rolling twelve month basis. We were in compliance with our debt covenants as of August 31, 2011.

Table of ContentsDecember 5, 2012.

        We borrowed $10,000,000 from Bank of America in September 2009 in order to fund our acquisition of CIM. This borrowing involved an unsecured, three year term note (the "Term Note") with interest and principal payments due monthly. Interest iswas calculated at the applicable LIBORLondon Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR) rate plus a margin of 175 basis points, with interest payments due on the last day of each month. At August 31, 2011, the applicable interest rate was 1.94% per annum and the outstanding principal amount was $6,000,000. In addition to monthly interest payments, we arewere repaying the principal in equal installments of $167,000 per month, beginning on September 30, 2009, and on the last day of each month thereafter ending on August 31, 2012, when we will repay the remaining principal balance plus any interest then due. The Term Note is subject to the same debt covenants as our line of credit discussed above.until maturity. Prepayment of the Term Note iswas allowed at any time during the term of the loan. In November 2011, we executed an amendment to this Term Note, extending the maturity from August 31, 2012 to August 31, 2014. Monthly payments of $167,000 will continue through August 2014, at which time we will repay the remaining principal balance plus any interest then due. All other terms of theThe Term Note remain the same.was retired in June 2012, as described below.

        As part of the CIM acquisition in September 2009, we also delivered an aggregate of $3,000,000 in non-negotiable promissory notes (the "Notes") payable to five CIM shareholders, who were the holders of all of the issued and outstanding shares of capital stock of CIM as of the acquisition date. The principal of the Notes will bewas paid in three consecutive annual installments of $1,000,000 each, with the initial payment due on September 4, 2010.each. Interest on the unpaid principal balance of the Notes iswas accruing at a rate per annum equal to the applicable Federal rate, and will bewas paid annually with each principal payment. At August 31, 2011, the applicable interest rate was 0.84% per annum. We paid the first installment on the Notes in September 2010, and the second installment was paid in September 2011.2011, and the third and final installment was paid in August 2012.

        In December 2009, we borrowed $7,000,000 from RBS Citizens in order to fund our acquisition of the ServiWrap product lines. This borrowing involved an unsecured, three year term note (the "Term Loan") with interest and principal payments due monthly. Interest iswas calculated at the applicable LIBOR rate plus a margin of 190 basis points, with interest payments due on the last day of each month. In addition to monthly interest payments, we arewere repaying the principal in equal installments of $117,000 each, beginning on January 15, 2010, and on the 15th day of each month thereafter ending on December 15, 2012, when we will repay the remaining principal balance plus any interest then due. The Term Loan is subject to the same debt covenants as our line of credit discussed above.until maturity. Prepayment of the Term Loan iswas allowed at any time. In February 2012, we executed an amendment to this Term Loan, extending the maturity from December 15, 2012 to December 15, 2014. The Term Loan was retired in June 2012, as described below.

        In June 2012, as part of our acquisition of NEPTCO, Inc., we borrowed $70,000,000 under a five year term debt financing arrangement led and arranged by Bank of America, with participation from RBS Citizens (the "Credit Facility"). The applicable interest rate is based on the effective LIBOR plus a range of 1.75% to 2.25%, depending on our consolidated leverage ratio. At August 31, 2011,2012, the applicable interest rate was 2.11%2.25% per annum and the outstanding principal amount was approximately $4,700,000.$70,000,000. We are required to repay the principal amount of the term loan in quarterly installments of $1,400,000 beginning in September 2012 through June 2014, increasing to $1,750,000

Table of Contents

per quarter thereafter through June 2015, and to $2,100,000 per quarter thereafter through March 2017. The Credit Facility matures in June 2017. Prepayment of the Credit Facility is allowed at any time.

        As part of the financing for this acquisition, we retired all of our pre-existing debt (the Term Note and Term Loan noted above) with Bank of America and RBS Citizens. Additionally, we obtained a new revolving line of credit (the "Revolver") totaling $15,000,000 which replaced our then existing $10,000,000 line. The Revolver bears interest at LIBOR plus a range of 1.75% to 2.25%, depending on our consolidated leverage ratio, or, at our option, at the bank's base lending rate. As of August 31, 2012 and October 31, 2012, the entire amount of $15,000,000 was available for use. The Revolver is scheduled to mature in June 2017. This Revolver allows for increased flexibility for working capital requirements going forward, and we plan to use this availability to help finance our cash needs, including potential acquisitions, in fiscal 2013 and future periods.

        The Credit Facility with Bank of America contains customary affirmative and negative covenants that, among other things, restrict our ability to incur additional indebtedness. It also requires us to maintain a ratio of consolidated indebtedness to consolidated EBITDA (each as defined in the facility) of no more than 3.00 to 1.00, and to maintain a consolidated fixed charge coverage ratio (as calculated in the facility) of at least 1.25 to 1.00. We were in compliance with our debt covenants as of August 31, 2012.

        We currently have several on-going capital projects that are important to our long term strategic goals. These projects include the upcoming move of our HumiSeal Europe LTD manufacturing operations from Camberley, UKWe continue to a modern facility in Winnersh, UK. Additionally, we have the continued renovations torenovate our Oxford, MA, facility, as well asand Blawnox, PA facilities in anticipation of the recently announced closingrelocation of our operations from Randolph, MA plant whichMA. We expect that this transition will be transitioned to our other facilities over the course of a fifteen month transition period.completed by December 2012. Machinery and equipment will also be added as needed to increase capacity or enhance operating efficiencies in our other manufacturing plants.

        We may consider the acquisition of companies or other assets this year or in future periods which are complementary to our business. We believe that our existing resources, including cash on hand and our line of credit,Revolver, together with cash generated from operations and additional bank borrowings, will be sufficient to fund our cash flow requirements through at least the next twelve months. However, there can be no assurances that additional financing will be available on favorable terms, if at all.

        To the extent that interest rates increase in future periods, we will assess the impact of these higher interest rates on the financial and cash flow projections of our potential acquisitions.

        We have no significant off balance sheet arrangements.

Table of Contents

Contractual Obligations

        The following table summarizes our contractual cash obligations at August 31, 20112012 and the effect such obligations are expected to have on our liquidity and cash flow in future periods.

(1)

We may be required to make payments related to our unrecognized tax benefits. However, due to the uncertainty of the timing of future cash flows associated with these unrecognized tax benefits, we are unable to make reasonably reliable estimates of the period of cash settlement, if any, with the respective taxing authorities. Accordingly, unrecognized tax benefits of $893,000$1,180,000 as of August 31, 20112012 have been excluded from the contractual obligations table above. See Note 7 "Income Taxes" to the Consolidated Financial Statements for further information.

(2)

This table does not include the expected payments for our obligations for pension and other post-retirement benefit plans. As of August 31, 2012, we had recognized an accrued benefit liability of $7,917,000 representing the unfunded benefit obligations of the pension benefit plans. See Note 9 "Benefits and Pension Plans" to the Consolidated Financial Statements for further information, including expected pension benefit payments for the next 10 years.

Table of Contents

Recently Issued Accounting Standards

        In January 2010,May 2011, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued Accounting Standards Update ("ASU") No. 2010-06, "Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures (Accounting Standards Codification "ASC" Topic 820)—Improving Disclosures about2011-04, Fair Value Measurements"Measurement (Topic 820): Amendments to Achieve Common Fair Value Measurement and Disclosure Requirements in U.S. GAAP and International Financial Reporting Standards ("ASU 2010-06"2011-04"). The updated standard requires new disclosures around transfers into and out of Levels 1 and 2 in theThis clarifies existing fair value hierarchymeasurement and separatedisclosure requirements, amends certain fair value measurement principles and requires additional disclosures about purchases, sales, issuances, and settlements to be presented separately on a gross basis in the reconciliation of Level 3 fair value measurements. The three-level fair value hierarchy is described in more detail in Note 16 to the financial statements filed as part of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. ASU 2010-062011-04 is effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2009 with early2011. The adoption permitted, except for the Level 3 reconciliation disclosures which are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2010. The portion of the update which was effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2009 was adopted by us effective March 1, 2010 and the adoptionASU 2011-04 did not have any effect on our consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows. The portion of the update which is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2010 will not have an impact on our consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

        In December 2010, the FASB issued ASU No. 2010-29, "Business Combinations (ASC Topic 805)—Disclosure of Supplementary Pro Forma Information for Business Combinations" ("ASU 2010-29"). This standard update clarifies that, when presenting comparative financial statements, SEC registrants should disclose revenue and earnings of the combined entityflows as though the current period business combinations had occurred as of the beginning of the comparable prior annual reporting period only. The update also expands the supplemental pro forma disclosures to include a description of the nature and amount of material, nonrecurring pro forma adjustments directly attributable to the business combination included in the reported pro forma revenue and earnings. ASU 2010-29 is effective prospectively for material (either on an individual or aggregate basis) business combinations entered into in fiscal years beginning on or after December 15, 2010, with early adoption permitted. The adoption of ASU 2010-29 will not have an impact on our consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows; however, we may haveit only required additional disclosure requirements if a material acquisition occurs.footnote disclosures.

        In June 2011, the FASB issued ASU No. 2011-05, "Comprehensive Income (ASC Topic 220): Presentation of Comprehensive Income," ("ASU 2011-05") which amends current comprehensive income guidance. This accounting update eliminates the option to present the components of other comprehensive income as part of the statement of shareholders' equity. Instead, we must report comprehensive income in either a single continuous statement of comprehensive income which contains two sections, net income and other comprehensive income, or in two separate but consecutive statements. The items that must be reported in other comprehensive income were not changed. In December 2011, the FASB issued ASU No. 2011-12, "Deferral of the Effective Date for Amendments to the Presentation of Reclassifications of Items Out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income in Accounting Standards Update No. 2011-05," ("ASU 2011-12") which amends ASU 2011-05 will be effectiveby indefinitely deferring the requirement under ASU 2011-05 to present reclassification adjustments out of accumulated other comprehensive income by component in both the statement in which net income is presented and the statement in which other comprehensive income is presented. We adopted ASU 2011-05 with retrospective application as required, except for public companies during the interimcomponents of ASU 2011-05 which were indefinitely deferred by ASU 2011-12, and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2011 with early adoption permitted.have included in our consolidated financial statements separate statements of comprehensive income. The adoption of ASU 2011-05 willdid not have an impact on our consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows as it only requiresrequired a change in the format of ourthe current presentation.

Table of Contents

        In September 2011, the FASB issued ASU No. 2011-08, "Intangibles—Goodwill and Other (ASC Topic 350)—Testing Goodwill for Impairment," ("ASU 2011-08") which gives companies the option to first perform a qualitative assessment to determine whether it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount before performing the two-step test mandated prior to this update. ASU 2011-08 also provides companies with a revised list of examples of events and circumstances to consider, in their totality, to determine whether it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount. If a company concludes that this is the case, it must perform the two-step test. Otherwise, a company may skip the two-step test. Companies are not required to perform the qualitative assessment and may instead proceed directly to the first step of the two-part test. ASU 2011-08 is effective for annual and interim goodwill impairment tests performed for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2011, with early adoption permitted. We do not expect that theThe adoption of ASU 2011-08 todid not have a materialan impact on our consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

Critical Accounting Policies, Judgments, and Estimates

        The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") requires companies to provide additional disclosure and commentary on their most critical accounting policies. The SEC has defined the most critical accounting policies as the ones that are most important to the portrayal of a company's financial condition and operating results, and requires management to make its most significant estimates and judgments in the preparation of its consolidated financial statements. Our critical accounting policies are described below.

Accounts Receivable

        We evaluate the collectability of accounts receivable balances based on a combination of factors. In cases where we are aware of circumstances that may impair a specific customer's ability to meet its financial obligations to us, a specific allowance against amounts due to us is recorded, and thereby reduces the net recognized receivable to the amount we reasonably believe will be collected. For all other customers, we recognize allowances for doubtful accounts based on the length of time the receivables are past due, industry and geographic concentrations, the current business environment and our historical experience. If the financial condition of our customers deteriorates or if economic conditions worsen, additional allowances may be required in the future, which could have an adverse impact on our future operating results.

Table of Contents

Inventories

        We value inventory at the lower of cost or market using the first-in, first-out (FIFO) method. Management assesses the recoverability of inventory based on types and levels of inventory held, forecasted demand and changes in technology. These assessments require management judgments and estimates, and valuation adjustments for excess and obsolete inventory may be recorded based on these assessments. We estimate excess and obsolescence exposures based upon assumptions about future demand, product transitions, and market conditions and record reserves to reduce inventories to their estimated net realizable value. The failure to accurately forecast demand may lead to additional excess and obsolete inventory and future charges.

Business Combinations

        We assign the value of the consideration transferred to acquire a business to the tangible assets and identifiable intangible assets acquired and liabilities assumed on the basis of their fair values at the date of acquisition. We assess the fair value of assets, including intangible assets, using a variety of methods and each asset is measured at fair value from the perspective of a market participant. The method used to estimate the fair values of intangible assets incorporates significant assumptions regarding the estimates a market participant would make in order to evaluate an asset, including a market participant's use of the asset and the appropriate discount rates for a market participant. Assets recorded from the perspective of a market participant that are determined to not have economic use for us are expensed immediately. Any excess purchase price over the fair value of the net tangible and intangible assets acquired is allocated to goodwill. Transaction costs and restructuring costs associated with a transaction to acquire a business are expensed as incurred.

Table of Contents

Goodwill, Intangible Assets, and Other Long-Lived Assets

        Long-lived assets consist of goodwill, identifiable intangible assets, trademarks, patents and agreements and property, plant, and equipment. Intangible assets and property, plant, and equipment, excluding goodwill, are amortized using the straight-line method over their estimated useful life. We review long-lived assets and all intangible assets for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate the carrying amount of such assets may not be recoverable. Goodwill is also reviewed at least annually for impairment. Factors which we consider important and that could trigger an impairment review include significant underperformance relative to expected historical or projected future operating results and significant negative industry or economic trends. We determine whether an impairment has occurred based on gross expected future cash flows for each reporting unit and measure the amount of the impairment based on the related future discounted cash flows for the respective reporting unit. The cash flow estimates used to determine impairment, if any, contain management's best estimates, using appropriate and customary assumptions and projections at the time. (See notesNote 4 to consolidated financial statements.the Consolidated Financial Statements included in this Report.)

        The estimates of expected cash flows require us to make significant judgments regarding future periods that are subject to some factors outside of our control. Changes in these estimates can result in significant revisions to the carrying value of these assets and may result in material charges to the results of operations.

Revenue Recognition

        We recognize revenue when persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, performance of our obligation is complete, our price to the buyer is fixed or determinable, and we are reasonably assured of collecting. This is typically at the time of shipment.shipment, or upon receipt by the customer. If a loss is anticipated on any contract, a provision for the entire loss is made immediately. Revenue recognition involves judgments and assessments of expected returns, and the likelihood of nonpayment due to insolvent customers. We analyze various factors, including a review of specific customer contracts and shipment terms, historical experience, creditworthiness of customers and current market and economic conditions in determining when to recognize revenue. Changes in judgments on these factors could impact the timing and amount of revenue recognized with a resulting impact on the timing and amount of associated income. Commissions are recognized when earned and payments are received from the manufacturers represented. Royalty revenue is recognized based on licensee production statements received from the authorized manufacturers. Billed shipping and handling fees are recorded as sales revenue with the associated costs recorded as costs of products and services sold.

Table of Contents

Contingent Income Tax Liabilities

        We are subject to routine income tax audits that occur periodically in the normal course of business. Our contingent income tax liabilities are estimated based on the methodology prescribed in the guidance for accounting for uncertain tax positions, which we adopted as of the beginning of fiscal 2008. The guidance prescribes a minimum recognition threshold a tax position is required to meet before being recognized in the financial statements. Our liabilities related to uncertain tax positions require an assessment of the probability of the income-tax-related exposures and settlements and are influenced by our historical audit experiences with various state and federal taxing authorities as well as by current income tax trends. If circumstances change, we may be required to record adjustments that could be material to our reported financial condition and results of operations. See Note 7 to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in this Report for more information on our accounting for uncertain tax positions.

Deferred Income Taxes

        We evaluate the need for a valuation allowance to reduce our deferred tax assets to the amount that is more likely than not to be realized. We have considered future taxable income and ongoing prudent and feasible tax planning strategies in assessing the need for a valuation allowance. Should we determine that we would not be able to realize all or part of our net deferred tax asset in the future, an adjustment to the deferred tax asset would be charged to income in the period such determination was made.

Stock Based Compensation

        We measure compensation cost for share-based compensation at fair value, including estimated forfeitures, and recognize the expense over the period that the recipient is required to provide service in exchange for the

Table of Contents

award, which generally is the vesting period. We use the Black-Scholes option pricing model to measure the fair value of stock options. This model requires significant estimates related to the award's expected life and future stock price volatility of the underlying equity security. In determining the amount of expense to be recorded, we are also required to estimate forfeiture rates for awards, based on the probability that employees will complete the required service period. We estimate the forfeiture rate based on historical experience. If actual forfeitures differ significantly from our estimates, additional adjustments to compensation expense may be required in future periods.

Pension Benefits

        We sponsor a non-contributory defined benefit pension plan covering substantially all employees of certain divisions of the Company. In calculating our retirement plan obligations and related expense, we make various assumptions and estimates. These assumptions include discount rates, benefits earned, expected return on plan assets, mortality rates, and other factors. While we believe that the assumptions used are appropriate, differences in actual experience or changes in assumptions may affect our pension obligations and future expense.

        Effective December 1, 2008, the defined benefit pension plan was amended to include a soft freeze whereby any employee hired after the effective date of December 1, 2008 will not be admitted to the plan. The only exception relates to employees of the International Association of Machinists and Aerospace Workers Union.Union whose contract was amended recently to include a soft freeze whereby any employees hired after the effective date of July 15, 2012 will not be admitted to the plan. All eligible participants who were previously admitted to the plan prior to the December 1, 2008 and July 15, 2012 soft freeze dates, respectively, will continue to accrue benefits as detailed in the plan agreements.

        NEPTCO has a defined benefit pension plan covering substantially all of our union employees at our Pawtucket, RI plant. This plan was frozen effective October 31, 2006, and as a result, no new participants can enter the plan and the benefits of current participants were frozen as of that date. The benefits are based on years of service and the employee's average compensation during the earlier of five years before retirement, or October 31, 2006.

We account for our pension planplans following the requirements of ASC Topic 715, "Compensation—Retirement Benefits" ("ASC 715"). ASC 715 requires an employer to: (a) recognize in its statement of financial position the funded status of a benefit plan; (b) measure defined benefit plan assets and obligations as of the end of the employer's fiscal year (with limited exceptions); and (c) recognize as a component of other comprehensive income, net of tax, the gains or losses and prior service costs or credits that arise but are not recognized as components of net periodic benefit costs pursuant to prior existing guidance.

Table of Contents

Impact of Inflation

        Inflation has not had a significant long-term impact on our earnings. In the event of significant inflation, our efforts to recover cost increases would be hampered as a result of the competitive nature of the industries in which we operate.

Forward-Looking Information

        From time to time, we may publish, verbally or in written form, forward-looking statements relating to such matters as anticipated financial performance, business prospects, technological developments, new products, acquisition or consolidation strategies, anticipated sources of capital, research and development activities and similar matters. In fact, this Form 10-K (or any other periodic reporting documents required by the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended) may contain forward-looking statements reflecting our current views concerning potential or anticipated future events or developments, including our strategic goals for future fiscal periods. The Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 provides a "safe harbor" for forward-looking statements. We caution investors that any forward-looking statements made by us are not guarantees of future performance and that a variety of factors could cause our actual results and experience to differ materially from the anticipated results or other expectations expressed in our forward-looking statements. The risks and uncertainties which may affect the operations, performance, development and results of our business include, but are not limited to, the following: uncertainties relating to economic conditions; uncertainties relating to customer plans and commitments; the pricing and availability of equipment, materials and inventories; the impact of acquisitions on our business and results of operations; technological developments; performance issues with suppliers and subcontractors; our ability to renew existing credit facilities or to obtain new or additional financing as needed; economic growth; delays in testing of new products; rapid technology changes and the highly competitive environment in which we operate. These risks and uncertainties also include those risks outlined under Item 1A (Risk Factors) of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date the statement was made.

Table of Contents

ITEM 7A—QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

        We limit the amount of credit exposure to any one issuer. At August 31, 2011,2012, other than our restricted investments (which are restricted for use in a non-qualified retirement savings plan for certain key employees and members of the Board of Directors), all of our funds were either in demand deposit accounts or investment instruments that meet high credit quality standards such as money market funds, government securities, or commercial paper.

        Our domestic operations have limited currency exposure since substantially all transactions are denominated in U.S. dollars. However, our European operations are subject to currency exchange fluctuations. We continue to review our policies and procedures to reduce this exposure while maintaining the benefit from these operations and sales to other European customers. As of August 31, 2011, we2012, the Company had cash balances in the United Kingdom for our UK operations denominated primarily in pounds sterling and equal to $4,924,000 and cash balances in France for our HumiSeal Europe SARL division denominated primarily in euros and equal to $566,000.following foreign currencies (with USD equivalents):

        We will continue to review our current cash balances denominated in foreign currency in light of current tax guidelines and potential acquisitions.

        We recognized a foreign currency translation gainloss for the year ended August 31, 20112012 in the amount of $1,418,000$904,000 related to our European operations which is recorded in other comprehensive income (loss) within our Statement of Stockholders' Equity. We do not have or utilize any derivative financial instruments.

Table of Contents

ITEM 8—FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA

        The following Consolidated Financial Statements of Chase Corporation are filed as part of this Annual Report on Form 10-K:

        Index to Consolidated Financial Statements:

Table of Contents

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

To the Board of Directors and Shareholders of Chase Corporation:

        In our opinion, the accompanying consolidated balance sheets and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders'comprehensive income, equity and cash flows present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Chase Corporation and its subsidiaries at August 31, 20112012 and 2010,2011, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended August 31, 20112012 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Also in our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of August 31, 20112012, based on criteria established inInternal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). The Company's management is responsible for these financial statements, for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting included in Item 9A, "Management's Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting." Our responsibility is to express opinions on these financial statements and on the Company's internal control over financial reporting based on our integrated audits. We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement and whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audits of the financial statements included examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. Our audit of internal control over financial reporting included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audits also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinions.

        A company's internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company's internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (i) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (ii) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company's assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

        Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

        As described in "Management's Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting," included in Item 9A, management has excluded NEPTCO, Inc. from its assessment of internal control over financial reporting as of August 31, 2012, because it was acquired by the Company in a business combination during the fiscal year ended August 31, 2012. We have also excluded NEPTCO, Inc. from our audit of internal control over financial reporting. NEPTCO, Inc. is a wholly-owned subsidiary whose total assets and revenues represent 39% and 10%, respectively, of the related consolidated financial statement amounts as of and for the year ended August 31, 2012.

/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Boston, MA
November 14, 20112012

Table of Contents

CHASE CORPORATION

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

In thousands, except share and per share amounts

See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements.

Table of Contents

CHASE CORPORATION

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

In thousands, except share and per share amounts