Use these links to rapidly review the document
TABLE OF CONTENTSTable of Contents

TABLE OF CONTENTS


UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K10‑K

(Mark One)


ý



ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934


For the fiscal year ended December 31, 20132014


OR


o



TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

Commission file number: 1-113141‑11314

LTC PROPERTIES, INC.

(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)

MARYLAND

(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or

organization)

71-072051871‑0720518

(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

2829 Townsgate Road, Suite 350

Westlake Village, California 91361

(Address of principal executive offices)

Registrant'sRegistrant’s telephone number, including area code: (805) 981-8655981‑8655

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

Title of Each Class

Name of Each Exchange on Which Registered

Common stock, $.01 Par Value

New York Stock Exchange

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:NONE

Indicate by checkmark if the Registrant is a well-knownwell‑known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes ý  No o

Indicate by checkmark if the Registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes o  No ý

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ý   No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-TS‑T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes ý  No o

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-KS‑K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of the Registrant'sRegistrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K10‑K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. o10‑K. ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-acceleratednon‑accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of "large“large accelerated filer," "accelerated” “accelerated filer," and "smaller“smaller reporting company"company” in Rule 12b-212b‑2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Large accelerated filer ý

Accelerated filer o

Non‑accelerated filer ☐

Non-accelerated filer o

Smaller reporting company o

(Do not check if a smaller

reporting company)

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-212b‑2 of the Act). Yes o  No ý

The aggregate market value of voting and non-votingnon‑voting common equity held by non-affiliatesnon‑affiliates of the Registrant was approximately $1,328,151,000$1,336,340,000 as of June 28, 201330, 2014 (the last business day of the Registrant'sRegistrant’s most recently completed second fiscal quarter).

The number of shares of common stock outstanding as of February 14, 201419, 2015 was 34,804,385.35,540,762.

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

Portions of the Registrant'sRegistrant’s definitive proxy statement relating to its 20142015 Annual Meeting of Stockholders are incorporated by reference into Part III of this Annual Report on Form 10-K10‑K where indicated.

 


Table of Contents


CAUTIONARY STATEMENT

This annual report contains forward-lookingforward‑looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, adopted pursuant to the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Statements that are not purely historical may be forward-looking.forward‑looking. You can identify some of the forward-lookingforward‑looking statements by their use of forward-lookingforward‑looking words, such as "believes," "expects," "may," "will," "should," "seeks," "approximately," "intends," "plans," "estimates"“believes,” “expects,” “may,” “will,” “should,” “seeks,” “approximately,” “intends,” “plans,” “estimates” or "anticipates,"“anticipates,” or the negative of those words or similar words. Forward-Forward‑ looking statements involve inherent risks and uncertainties regarding events, conditions and financial trends that may affect our future plans of operation, business strategy, results of operations and financial position. A number of important factors could cause actual results to differ materially from those included within or contemplated by such forward-lookingforward‑ looking statements, including, but not limited to, the status of the economy; the status of capital markets (including prevailing interest rates) and our access to capital; the income and returns available from investments in health care related real estate (including our ability to re-leasere‑lease properties upon expiration of a lease term); the ability of our borrowers and lessees to meet their obligations to us; our reliance on a few major operators; competition faced by our borrowers and lessees within the health care industry; regulation of the health care industry by federal, state and local governments (including as a result of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010 and the Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act of 2010); changes in Medicare and Medicaid reimbursement amounts (including due to federal and state budget constraints); compliance with and changes to regulations and payment policies within the health care industry; debt that we may incur and changes in financing terms; our ability to continue to qualify as a real estate investment trust; the relative illiquidity of our real estate investments; potential limitations on our remedies when mortgage loans default; and risks and liabilities in connection with properties owned through limited liability companies and partnerships. For a discussion of these and other factors that could cause actual results to differ from those contemplated in the forward-lookingforward‑looking statements, please see the discussion under "Risk Factors"“Risk Factors” contained in this annual report and in other information contained in this annual report and our publicly available filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission. We do not undertake any responsibility to update or revise any of these factors or to announce publicly any revisions to forward-lookingforward‑looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.

2


Table of Contents

LTC Properties, Inc

Table of Contents

Page

Part I

Item 1.

Business

4

Item 1A.

Risk Factors

18

Item 1B.

Unresolved Staff Comments

23

Item 2.

Properties

24

Item 3.

Legal Proceedings

25

Item 4.

Mine Safety Disclosures

26

Part II

Item 5.

Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

26

Item 6.

Selected Financial Data

29

Item 7.

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

30

Item 7A.

Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

49

Item 8.

Financial Statements

50

Item 9.

Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure

92

Item 9A.

Controls and Procedures

92

Item 9B.

Other Information

95

Part III

Item 10.

Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance

95

Item 11.

Executive Compensation

95

Item 12.

Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters

95

Item 13.

Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence

95

Item 14.

Principal Accountant Fees and Services

95

Part IV

Item 15.

Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules

96

INDEX TO  EXHIBITS

97

SIGNATURES

98

3


Table of Contents

PART I

Item 1.  BUSINESS

General

LTC Properties, Inc., a health care real estate investment trust (or REIT), was incorporated on May 12, 1992 in the State of Maryland and commenced operations on August 25, 1992. We invest primarily in senior housing and long term care properties through acquisitions, development, mortgage loans and other investments. We conduct and manage our business as one operating segment, rather than multiple operating segments, for internal reporting and internal decision making purposes. Our primary objectives are to create, sustain and enhance stockholder equity value and provide current income for distribution to stockholders through real estate investments in senior housing and long term care properties managed by experienced operators. Our primary senior housing and long term healthcare property types include skilled nursing properties (or SNF), assisted living properties (or ALF), independent living properties (or ILF), memory care properties (or MC) and combinations thereof. To meet these objectives, we attempt to invest in properties that provide opportunity for additional value and current returns to our stockholders and diversify our investment portfolio by geographic location, operator, property type and form of investment.

Skilled nursing facilities provide restorative, rehabilitative and nursing care for people not requiring the more extensive and sophisticated treatment available at acute care hospitals. Many skilled


nursing facilities provide ancillary services that include occupational, speech, physical, respiratory and IV therapies, as well as sub-acutesub‑acute care services which are paid either by the patient, the patient'spatient’s family, private health insurance, or through the federal Medicare or state Medicaid programs.

Assisted living facilities serve elderly persons who require assistance with activities of daily living, but do not require the constant supervision skilled nursing facilities provide. Services are usually available 24 hours a day and include personal supervision and assistance with eating, bathing, grooming and administering medication. The facilities provide a combination of housing, supportive services, personalized assistance and health care designed to respond to individual needs.

Independent living facilities, also known as retirement communities or senior apartments, offer a sense of community and numerous levels of service, such as laundry, housekeeping, dining options/meal plans, exercise and wellness programs, transportation, social, cultural and recreational activities, on-siteon‑ site security and emergency response programs. Many offer on-siteon‑site conveniences like beauty/barber shops, fitness facilities, game rooms, libraries and activity centers.

Memory care facilities offer specialized options for seniors with Alzheimer'sAlzheimer’s disease and other forms of dementia. Purpose built, free-standingfree‑standing memory care facilities offer an attractive alternative for private-payprivate‑pay residents affected by memory loss in comparison to other accommodations that typically have been provided within a secured unit of an assisted living or skilled nursing facility. These facilities offer dedicated care and specialized programming for various conditions relating to memory loss in a secured environment that is typically smaller in scale and more residential in nature than traditional assisted living facilities. Residents require a higher level of care and more assistance with activities of daily living than in assisted living facilities. Therefore, these facilities have staff available 24 hours a day to respond to the unique needs of their residents.

We were organized to qualify, and intend to continue to qualify, as a REIT. So long as we qualify, with limited exceptions, we may deduct distributions, both preferred dividends and common dividends, to our stockholders from our taxable income. We have made distributions, and intend to continue to make distributions to our stockholders, in order to eliminate any federal tax liability.

Portfolio

Our real estate investment in senior housing and long term care properties is managed and conducted as a single operating segment for internal reporting and for internal decision-makingdecision‑making purposes. ALF, ILF, MC, and combinations thereof are included in the ALF property type. Range of care properties (or ROC) property type consists of properties providing skilled nursing and any combination of assisted living, independent living and/or memory care services. Other properties (or Other) property type consists of a school properties and land held-for-use.held‑for‑use. In addition to the information below, seeItem 2. Properties for more information about our portfolio.


4


 

Table of Contents

The following table summarizes our real estate investment portfolio as of December 31, 2013 (dollar2014 (dollar amounts in thousands):

 
  
  
 Twelve Months Ended
December 31, 2013
  
  
 Number of 
Type of Property
 Gross
Investments
 Percentage of
Investments
 Rental
Income
 Interest
Income(1)
 Percentage
of
Revenues(2)
 Number of
Properties(3)
 SNF
Beds(4)
 ALF
Units(4)
 

Skilled Nursing(5)

 $611,160  55.3%$50,046 $4,881  52.6% 100  12,217   

Assisted Living

  412,024  37.3% 41,641  1,103  40.9% 106    4,852 

Range of Care

  46,509  4.2% 4,904  314  5.0% 9  733  348 

Under Development(6)

  21,432  2.0%     0.0%      

Other(7)

  13,607  1.2% 1,575    1.5% 2     
                  
���

Totals

 $1,104,732  100.0%$98,166 $6,298  100.0% 217  12,950  5,200 
                  
                  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Twelve Months Ended

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

December 31, 2014

 

Percentage

 

 

 

Number of

 

 

    

Gross

    

Percentage of

    

Rental

    

Interest

    

of

    

Number of

    

SNF

    

ALF

 

Type of Property

 

Investments

 

Investments

 

Income(1)

 

Income(2)

 

Revenues

 

Properties(3)

 

Beds(4)

 

Units(4)

 

Skilled Nursing

 

$

633,052 

 

56.7 

%  

$

52,259 

 

$

14,595 

 

59.4 

%  

97 

 

12,057 

 

— 

 

Assisted Living

 

 

415,520 

 

37.2 

%  

 

37,847 

 

 

985 

 

34.5 

%  

92 

 

— 

 

4,446 

 

Range of Care

 

 

46,217 

 

4.1 

%  

 

5,332 

 

 

282 

 

5.0 

%  

 

733 

 

348 

 

Under Development(5)

 

 

11,495 

 

1.0 

%  

 

— 

 

 

— 

 

— 

%  

— 

 

— 

 

— 

 

Other(6)

 

 

10,883 

 

1.0 

%  

 

1,294 

 

 

— 

 

1.1 

%  

 

— 

 

— 

 

Totals

 

$

1,117,167 

 

100.0 

%  

$

96,732 

 

$

15,862 

 

100.0 

%  

198 

 

12,790 

 

4,794 

 


(1)

Excludes rental income from properties sold during 2014.

(1)
Includes interest income from mortgage loans.
(2)
Includes rental income and interest income from mortgage loans.
(3)
We have investments in 30 states leased or mortgaged to 40 different operators.
(4)
SeeItem 2. Properties for discussion of bed/unit count.
(5)
Includes a mortgage and construction loan secured by a currently operating skilled nursing property and parcel of land upon which a 106-bed replacement property is being constructed.
(6)
Includes three MC developments with a total of 168 units, a combination ALF and MC development with 81 units, and a SNF development with 143 beds.
(7)
Includes two school properties and four parcels of land held-for-use.

(2)

Excludes interest income from mortgage loans paid off during 2014.

(3)

We have investments in 29 states leased or mortgaged to 37 different operators.

(4)

See Item 2. Properties for discussion of bed/unit count.

(5)

Includes two MC developments with a total of 126 units.

(6)

Includes a school and five parcels of land held‑ for‑use.

As of December 31, 20132014 we had $884.4$892.2 million in carrying value of net real estate investment, consisting of $718.9$726.5 million or 81.3%81.4% invested in owned and leased properties and $165.4$165.7 million or 18.7%18.6% invested in mortgage loans secured by first mortgages.

Owned Properties.  The following table summarizes our investment in owned properties at December 31, 20132014 (dollar amounts in thousands):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Number of

 

Investment

 


  
  
  
 Number of  
 

 

Gross

 

Percentage of

 

Number of

 

SNF

 

ALF

 

per

 

Type of Property
 Gross
Investments
 Percentage of
Investments
 Number of
Properties(1)
 SNF
Beds(2)
 ALF
Units(2)
 Investment
per
Bed/Unit
 

 

Investments

 

Investments

 

Properties(1)

 

Beds(2)

 

Units(2)

 

Bed/Unit

 

Skilled Nursing

 $458,759 48.9% 68 8,264  $55.51 

    

$

482,036 

    

50.8 

%  

68 

    

8,407 

    

 —

    

$

57.34 

 

Assisted Living

 399,912 42.7% 98  4,641 $86.17 

 

 

401,517 

 

42.3 

%  

84 

 

 —

 

4,176 

 

$

96.15 

 

Range of Care

 43,907 4.7% 8 634 274 $48.36 

 

 

43,907 

 

4.6 

%  

 

634 

 

274 

 

$

48.36 

 

Under Development(3)

 21,432 2.3%     

 

 

11,495 

 

1.2 

%  

 —

 

 —

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

Other(4)

 13,607 1.4% 2    

 

 

10,883 

 

1.1 

%  

 

 —

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

             

Totals

 $937,617 100.0% 176 8,898 4,915   

 

$

949,838 

 

100.0 

%  

160 

 

9,041 

 

4,450 

 

 

 

 

             
             

(1)

We have investments in 26 states leased to 30 different operators.

(1)
We have investments in 27 states leased to 33 different operators.
(2)
SeeItem 2. Properties for discussion of bed/unit count.
(3)
Includes three MC developments with a total of 168 units, a combination ALF and MC development with 81 units, and a SNF development with 143 beds.
(4)
Includes two school properties and four parcels of land held-for-use.

(2)

See Item 2. Properties for discussion of bed/unit count.

(3)

Includes two MC developments with a total of 126 units.

(4)

Includes a school and five parcels of land held‑ for‑use.

Owned properties are leased pursuant to non-cancelablenon‑cancelable operating leases generally with an initial term of 10 to 15 years. Many of the leases contain renewal options. The leases provide for fixed minimum base rent during the initial and renewal periods. The majority of our leases contain provisions for specified annual increases over the rents of the prior year and that increase is generally computed in one of four ways depending on specific provisions of each lease:


(i)

a specified percentage increase over the prior year’s rent, generally between 2.0% and 3.0%;

Contents

Each lease is a triple net lease which requires the lessee to pay all taxes, insurance, maintenance and repairs, capital and non-capitalnon‑capital expenditures and other costs necessary in the operations of the facilities. Generally our leases provide for one or more of the following: security deposits, property tax impounds, and credit enhancements such as corporate or personal guarantees or letters of credit. In addition, our leases are typically structured as master leases and multiple master leases with one operator are generally cross defaulted. SeeItem 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—NOTE 6. Real Estate Investments for further descriptions. The following table summarizes our top ten operators for 20132014 and percentage of rental revenue for those operators for 20132014 and 2012:2013:

 

 

 

 

 

 

Percent of

 


 Percent of
Rental Revenue
 

 

Rental Revenue

 

Lessee
 2013 2012 

    

2014

    

2013

 

Brookdale Senior Living Communities, Inc.

 

14.9 

%  

11.2 

%

Senior Care Centers, LLC

 12.0% 12.5%

 

12.7 

%  

12.0 

%

Extendicare, Inc. and Assisted Living Concepts, Inc.

 11.2% 12.7%

Brookdale Senior Living Communities, Inc.

 11.2% 12.5%

Preferred Care, Inc.

 10.1% 11.6%

 

10.3 

%  

10.1 

%

Traditions Senior Management, Inc.

 

7.0 

%  

5.6 

%

Juniper Communities, LLC

 6.8% 0.3%

 

6.9 

%  

6.8 

%

Traditions Senior Mgmt, Inc.

 5.6% 6.1%

Extendicare, Inc. and Enlivant

 

6.5 

%  

11.2 

%

Carespring Healthcare Management, LLC

 5.5% 2.6%

 

6.0 

%  

5.5 

%

Sunrise Senior Living

 4.7% 5.4%

 

4.8 

%  

4.7 

%

Skilled Healthcare Group, Inc.

 4.6% 5.2%

 

4.7 

%  

4.6 

%

Fundamental Long Term Care Company

 3.4% 3.4%

 

4.0 

%  

3.4 

%

Mortgage Loans.  As part of our strategy of making long term investments in properties used in the provision of long term health care services, we provide mortgage financing on such properties based on our established investment underwriting criteria. We have also provided construction loans that by their terms converted into purchase/lease transactions or permanent financing mortgage loans upon completion of construction. The following table summarizes our investments in mortgage loans secured by first mortgages at December 31, 20132014 (dollar amounts in thousands):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Average

 


  
  
  
  
 Number of  
 

 

 

 

 

Percentage

 

 

 

 

 

Number of

 

 

 

Investment

 


  
  
  
  
 Average
Investment
per
Bed/Unit
 

 

Gross

 

of

 

Number

 

Number of

 

SNF

 

ALF

 

per

 

Type of Property
 Gross
Investments
 Percentage
of
Investments
 Number
of Loans
 Number of
Properties(1)
 SNF
Beds(2)
 ALF
Units(2)
 

 

Investments

 

Investments

 

of Loans

 

Properties(1)

 

Beds(2)

 

Units(2)

 

Bed/Unit

 

Skilled Nursing(3)

 $152,401 91.2% 16 32 3,953  $38.55 

Skilled Nursing

    

$

151,016 

    

90.3 

%  

15 

    

29 

    

3,650 

    

 —

    

$

41.37 

 

Assisted Living

 12,112 7.2% 3 8  211 $57.40 

 

 

14,003 

 

8.3 

%  

 

 

 —

 

270 

 

$

51.86 

 

Range of Care

 2,602 1.6% 1 1 99 74 $15.04 

 

 

2,310 

 

1.4 

%  

 

 

99 

 

74 

 

$

13.35 

 

               

Totals

 $167,115 100.0% 20 41 4,052 285   

 

$

167,329 

 

100.0 

%  

19 

 

38 

 

3,749 

 

344 

 

 

 

 

               
               

(1)

We have investments in 9 states that include mortgages to 12 different operators.

(1)
We have investments in 9 states that include mortgages to 12 different operators.
(2)
SeeItem 2. Properties for discussion of bed/unit count.
(3)
Includes a mortgage and construction loan secured by a currently operating skilled nursing property and parcel of land upon which a 106-bed replacement property is being constructed.

(2)

See Item 2. Properties for discussion of bed/unit count.

In general, with the exception of a mortgage loan secured by 15 skilled nursing properties in Michigan, the mortgage loans may not be prepaid except in the event of the sale of the collateral property to a third party that is not affiliated with the borrower, although partial prepayments (including the prepayment premium) are often permitted where a mortgage loan is secured by more than one property upon a sale of one or more, but not all, of the collateral properties to a third party which is not an affiliate of the borrower. The terms of the mortgage loans generally impose a premium


upon prepayment of the loans depending upon the period in which the prepayment occurs, whether such prepayment was permitted or required, and certain other conditions such as upon the sale of the property under a pre-existingpre‑existing purchase option, destruction or condemnation, or other circumstances as approved by us. On certain loans, such prepayment amount is based upon a percentage of the then outstanding balance of the loan, usually declining ratably each year. For other loans, the prepayment premium is based on a yield maintenance formula. TheA mortgage loan secured by 15 skilled nursing properties in Michigan hashad a one-timeone‑time option between November 2015 and October 2025 to prepay up to 50% of the then outstanding loan balance without penalty. Exclusively forHowever, subsequent to December 31, 2014, the purposesborrower forfeited the prepayment option in conjunction with a modification of this option, the properties collateralizing the loan have been separated by us intoin exchange for our commitment of $20.0 million to fund the redevelopment of two pools of assets. If and when the option is exercised, we will identify which of the two pools we will release for prepayment and removal from the portfolio of properties securing the loan. In addition to a lien on the mortgaged property, the loans are generally secured by certain non-realnon‑real estate assets of the properties and contain

6


Table of Contents

certain other security provisions in the form of letters of credit, pledged collateral accounts, security deposits, cross-defaultcross‑ default and cross-collateralizationcross‑collateralization features and certain guarantees. SeeItem 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—Note 6. Real Estate Investments for further description.

Investment and Other Policies

Objectives and Policies.  Our investment policy is to invest primarily in income-producingincome‑producing senior housing and long term care properties. Over the past three years (2011(2012 through 2013)2014), we acquired skilled nursing, assisted living, independent living, memory care properties and combinations thereof, plus twelve13 parcels of land for a total of approximately $291.9$197.4 million. We alsoAlso over the past three years, we completed the development, re-development and expansion of eight assisted living properties and three skilled nursing properties for an aggregate investment of $87.3 million, excluding acquisition of parcels of land. Additionally, we invested approximately $137.1$146.5 million in mortgage loans over the past three years. We believe our liquidity and various sources of available capital are sufficient to fund operations and development commitments, meet debt service obligations (both principal and interest), make dividend distributions and finance future investments should we determine such future investments are financially feasible. The timing, source and amount of cash flows provided by financing activities and used in investing activities are sensitive to the capital markets environment, especially to changes in interest rates. We continuously evaluate the availability of cost-effectivecost‑effective capital and believe we have sufficient liquidity for additional capital investments in 2014.2015.

Our primary marketing and business development focusstrategy is to increase the awareness of our presence and build relationships in the seniors housing and care industry by supporting targeted industry trade organizations, attending industry specific conferences and events patronized by senior living providers, and seeking out speaking engagements at the state and regional levels through participation in various health care associations.industry related events. We believe that this targeted marketing effort has increased deal flow and continues to provide opportunities for new investments in 2014.2015. Since the competition from buyersinvestors as well as other capital providers for large transactions consisting of multiple propertyfully-marketed, multi-property portfolios generally resultsresult in pricing that does not meetvaluations above our targeted investment criteria, our marketing and business development efforts primarily focus on sourcing relationships with regionally based operating companies to execute on single property transactions (for acquisition, mortgage financing or development), or smaller multiple propertymulti-property portfolios that are not broadly marketed by third-party intermediaries which complement our historic investmentsinvestment execution and are priced withat yields that are accretive to our stockholders.

Historically our investments have consisted of:

·

fee ownership of senior housing and long term care properties that are leased to providers;

·

mortgage loans secured by senior housing and long term care properties; or

·

participation in such investments indirectly through investments in real estate partnerships or other entities that themselves make direct investments in such loans or properties.

In evaluating potential investments, we consider factors such as:


Contents

Prior to every investment, we conduct a property site review to assess the general physical condition of the property and the potential of additional services. In addition, we review the environmental reports, site surveys and financial statements of the property before the investment is made.

We believe skilled nursing facilities are the lowest cost provider for certain levels of acuity; therefore, such facilities play a vital role in our nation'snation’s health care delivery system. Our investments include direct ownership, development and mortgages secured by skilled nursing properties. We prefer to invest in a property that has a significant market presence in its community and where state certificate of need and/or licensing procedures limit the entry of competing properties.

We believe that assisted living, independent living and memory care facilities are an important sector in the long term care market and our investments include direct ownership, development and mortgages secured by assisted living, independent living and/or memory care properties. We have attempted to diversify our portfolio both geographically and across product levels.

Borrowing Policies.  We may incur additional indebtedness when, in the opinion of our Board of Directors, it is advisable. We may incur such indebtedness to make investments in additional senior housing and long term care properties or to meet the distribution requirements imposed upon REITs under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended. For other short-termshort‑term purposes, we may, from time to time, negotiate lines of credit, or arrange for other short-termshort‑term borrowings from banks or otherwise. We may also arrange for long-termlong‑term borrowings through public or private offerings or from institutional investors.

In addition, we may incur mortgage indebtedness on real estate which we have acquired through purchase, foreclosure or otherwise. We may also obtain mortgage financing for unleveraged or underleveraged properties in which we have invested or may refinance properties acquired on a leveraged basis.

        Prohibited Investments and Activities.    Our policies, which are subject to change by our Board of Directors without stockholder approval, impose certain prohibitions and restrictions on our investment practices or activities including prohibitions against:


Competition

In the health care industry, we compete for real property investments with health care providers, other health care related REITs, real estate partnerships, banks, private equity funds, venture capital funds and other investors. Many of our competitors are significantly larger and have greater financial resources and lower cost of capital than we have available to us. Our ability to compete successfully for real property investments will be determined by numerous factors, including our ability to identify suitable acquisition targets, our ability to negotiate acceptable terms for any such acquisition and the availability and our cost of capital.

The lessees and borrowers of our properties compete on a local, regional and, in some instances, national basis with other health care providers. The ability of the lessee or borrower to compete successfully for patients or residents at our properties depends upon several factors, including the levels of care and services provided by the lessees or borrowers, the reputation of the providers, physician referral patterns, physical appearances of the properties, family preferences, financial condition of the operator and other competitive systems of health care delivery within the community, population and demographics.

Government Regulation

The health care industry is heavily regulated by the government. Our borrowers and lessees who operate health care facilities are subject to extensive regulation by federal, state and local governments. These laws and regulations are subject to frequent and substantial changes resulting from legislation, adoption of rules and regulations, and administrative and judicial interpretations of existing law. These changes may have a dramatic effect on the definition of permissible or impermissible activities, the relative costs associated with doing business and the amount of reimbursement by both government and other third-party payors. These changes may be applied retroactively. The ultimate timing or effect of these changes cannot be predicted. The failure of any borrower of funds from us or lessee of any of our properties to comply with such laws, requirements and regulations could result in sanctions or remedies such as denials of payment for new Medicare and Medicaid admissions, civil monetary penalties, state oversight and loss of Medicare and Medicaid participation or licensure. Such action could affect our borrower'sborrower’s or lessee'slessee’s ability to operate

8


Table of Contents

its facility or facilities and could adversely affect such borrower'sborrower’s or lessee'slessee’s ability to make debt or lease payments to us.

The properties owned by us and the manner in which they are operated are affected by changes in the reimbursement, licensing and certification policies of federal, state and local governments. Properties may also be affected by changes in accreditation standards or procedures of accrediting agencies. In addition, expansion (including the addition of new beds or services or acquisition of medical equipment) and occasionally the discontinuation of services of health care facilities are, in some states, subjected to state and regulatory approval through "certificate“certificate of need"need” laws and regulations.


The ability of our borrowers and lessees to generate revenue and profit determines the underlying value of that property to us. Revenues of our borrowers and lessees of skilled nursing properties are generally derived from payments for patient care. Sources of such payments for skilled nursing facilities include the federal Medicare program, state Medicaid programs, private insurance carriers, managed care organizations, preferred provider arrangements, and self-insured employers, as well as the patients themselves.

A significant portion of the revenue of our skilled nursing property borrowers and lessees is derived from governmentally-funded reimbursement programs, such as Medicare and Medicaid. Because of significant health care costs paid by such government programs, both federal and state governments have adopted and continue to consider various health care reform proposals to control health care costs..costs. In many instances, revenues from Medicaid programs are insufficient to cover the actual costs incurred in providing care to Medicaid patients. Moreover, the Kaiser Commission on Medicaid and the Uninsured reportedstated in October 20132014 that the majority of34 states (39) reported enacting new Medicaid rate restrictions for at least one provider type in fiscal year 2013,2014, while 3433 states plan rate restrictions for fiscal year 2014.2015.  In fiscal year 2014, 34 states reported one or more rate restrictions across provider types and 46 states reported one or more rate increases. For fiscal year 2015, 33 states have planned at least one provider rate restriction while 45 states are planning at least one rate increase. On the other hand, the Kaiser Commission notes that due to improving state finances, more states are enhancing rates than restricting rates overall in 20132014 and 2014.2015.  With regard to nursing home rates in particular, 3439 states increased rates in fiscal year 20132014 and 38 have adopted40 plan rate increases for fiscal year 2014,2015, compared to nursing home rate restrictions being adopted in 17 states in fiscal year 2013 and 12 states in fiscal year 2014.2014 and 10 states in fiscal year 2015.  In addition, many states have been making changes to their long term care delivery systems that emphasize home and community-based long term care services, in some cases coupled with cost controls for institutional providers. According to the Kaiser Commission, 3342 states in fiscal year 20132014 and 3547 states in fiscal year 20142015 took action to expand the number of individuals serviced in home and community-based service programs.  The federal government also has adopted various policies to promote community-based alternatives to institutional services. Most recently, on January 16, 2014, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (or CMS) published a rule that provides states with new flexibility to offer home and community based-services as an optional Medicaid benefit and to draw federal matching funds.  As states and the federal government continue to respond to budget pressures, future reduction in Medicaid payments for skilled nursing facility services could have an adverse effect on the financial condition of our borrowers and lessees which could, in turn, adversely impact the timing or level of their payments to us.

Over the years there also have been fundamental changes in the Medicare program that resulted in reduced levels of payment for a substantial portion of health care services, including skilled nursing facility services.  CMS annually updates Medicare skilled nursing facility prospective payment system rates and other policies.policies.  On August 6, 2013,5, 2014, CMS published its final Medicare skilled nursing facility payment rate update for fiscal year 2014,2015, which began on October 1, 2013.2014.  CMS estimates that the final rule will increase aggregate Medicare skilled nursing facility payments by $470$750 million, or 1.3%2%, compared to fiscal year 20132014 levels.  Specifically, under the final rule, Medicare rates are updated to reflect a 2.3%2.5% market basket increase that is reduced by a 0.5 percentage point "multifactor“multifactor productivity adjustment"adjustment” mandated by the Affordable Care Act, and that is further reduced by a 0.5 percentage point forecast error correction. CMS also rebased the skilled nursing facility market basket to reflect fiscal year 2010 data and made other policy changes.Act.  There can be no assurance that any future reductions in Medicare skilled nursing facility payment rates or other policy changes would not have an adverse effect on the financial condition of our borrowers and lessees which could, in turn, adversely impact the timing or level of their payments to us.

Moreover, health care facilities continue to experience pressures from private payors attempting to control health care costs, and reimbursement from private payors has in many cases effectively been reduced to levels approaching those of government payors.  Governmental and public concern regarding health care costs may result in significant reductions in payment to health care facilities, and there can


be no assurance that future payment rates for either governmental or private payors will be sufficient to cover cost increases in providing services to patients. Any changes in reimbursement policies which reduce reimbursement to levels that are insufficient to cover the cost of

9


Table of Contents

providing patient care could adversely affect revenues of our skilled nursing property borrowers and lessees and to a much lesser extent our assisted living property borrowers and lessees and thereby adversely affect those borrowers'borrowers’ and lessees'lessees’ abilities to make their debt or lease payments to us. Failure of the borrowers or lessees to make their debt or lease payments would have a direct and material adverse impact on us.

Various federal and state laws govern financial and other arrangements between health care providers that participate in, receive payments from, or make or receive referrals for work in connection with government funded health care programs, including Medicare and Medicaid.  These laws, known as the fraud and abuse laws, include the federal anti-kickback statute, which prohibits, among other things, knowingly and willfully soliciting, receiving, offering or paying any remuneration directly or indirectly in return for, or to induce, the referral, or arrange for the referral, of an individual to a person for the furnishing of an item or service for which payment may be made under federal health care programs.    In addition, the federal physician self-referral law, commonly known as the Stark Law, prohibits physicians and certain other types of practitioners from making referrals for certain designated health services paid in whole or in part by Medicare and Medicaid to entities with which the practitioner or a member of the practitioner'spractitioner’s immediate family has a financial relationship, unless the financial relationship fits within an applicable exception to the Stark Law. The Stark Law also prohibits the entity receiving the referral from seeking payment under the Medicare program for services rendered pursuant to a prohibited referral. If an entity is paid for services rendered pursuant to a prohibited referral, it may incur civil penalties of up to $15,000 per prohibited claim and may be excluded from participating in the Medicare and Medicaid programs.  Many states have enacted similar fraud and abuse laws which are not necessarily limited to items and services for which payment is made by federal health care programs.  Violations of these laws may result in fines, imprisonment, denial of payment for services, and exclusion from federal and/or other state-funded programs.  Other federal and state laws authorize the imposition of penalties, including criminal and civil fines and exclusion from participation in federal health care programs for submitting false claims, improper billing and other offenses.  Federal and state government agencies have continued rigorous enforcement of criminal and civil fraud and abuse laws in the health care arena. Our borrowers and lessees are subject to many of these laws, and some of them could in the future become the subject of a governmental enforcement action.

Health Care Reform and Other Legislative Developments

Congress and the state legislatures regularly consider, and in some cases adopt, legislation impacting health care providers, including long term care providers.  For instance, the Balanced Budget Act of 1997 enacted significant changes to the Medicare and Medicaid programs designed to modernize payment and health care delivery systems while achieving substantial budgetary savings. Among other things, the law established the Medicare prospective payment system for skilled nursing facility services to replace the cost-based reimbursement system, which resulted in significant reductions in Medicare payments to skilled nursing facilities.  Over the years, Congress adopted legislation to somewhat mitigate the impact of the new payment system, including a temporary payment add-on for high-acuity patients, which subsequently expired, and a temporary payment add-on for residents with AIDS that still is in effect through fiscal year 2014.2015.  Other legislation enacted by Congress in recent years has reduced certain Medicare skilled nursing facility bad debt payments, strengthened Medicaid asset transfer restrictions for persons seeking to qualify for Medicaid long term care coverage, reduced Medicaid provider taxes that are used by many states to finance state health programs, and given states greater flexibility to expand access to home and community basedcommunity-based services.


In March 2010, the President signed into law the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, which subsequently was amended by the Health Care and Education and Reconciliation Act of 2010 (collectively referred to as the "Affordable“Affordable Care Act"Act”).  The Affordable Care Act is designed to expand access to affordable health insurance, contain health care costs, and institute a variety of health policy reforms.  The provisions of the sweeping law may affect us directly, as well as impact our lessees and borrowers.  While certain provisions, such as expanding the insured population, may positively impact the revenues of our lessees and borrowers, other provisions, particularly those intended to reduce federal health care spending, could have a negative impact on our lessees and borrowers.  Among other things, the Affordable Care Act:  reduces Medicare skilled nursing facility reimbursement by a so-called "productivity adjustment"“productivity adjustment” based on economy-wide productivity gains; requires the development of a value-based purchasing program for Medicare skilled nursing facility services; establishes a national voluntary pilot program to bundle Medicare payments for hospital and post-acute services that could lead to changes in the delivery of post-acute services; and provides incentives to state Medicaid programs to promote community-based care as an alternative to

10


Table of Contents

institutional long term care services.  The Affordable Care Act also includes provisions intended to expand public disclosure about nursing home ownership and operations, institute mandatory compliance and quality assurance programs, increase penalties for noncompliance, and expand fraud and abuse enforcement and penalty provisions that could impact our operators.  In addition, the Affordable Care Act impacts both us and our lessees and borrowers as employers, including new requirements related to the health insurance we offer to our respective employees.  Many aspects of the Affordable Care Act are being implemented through new regulations and subregulatory guidance. We cannot predict at this time what effect, if any, the various provisions of the Affordable Care Act will have on our lessees and borrowers or our business when fully implemented. There can be no assurances, however, that the Affordable Care Act will not adversely impact the operations, cash flows or financial condition of our lessees and borrowers, which subsequently could materially adversely impact our revenue and operations.

Under the terms of the Budget Control Act of 2011, as modified by the American Taxpayer Relief Act, President Obama issued a sequestration order on March 1, 2013 that mandates a 2% cut to Medicare payments to providers and health plans. The cuts generally apply to Medicare fee-for-service claims with dates-of-service or dates-of-discharge on or after April 1, 2013.  On December 26, 2013, President Obama signed into law H.J. Res. 59, the Bipartisan Budget Act of 2013, which among other things, extendedAs amended by subsequent legislation, the Medicare sequestration cuts for another two years,are currently scheduled to be applied through 2023,fiscal year 2024, although Congress and the Administration could enact legislation to end or modify sequestration at any time, including through alternative budget legislation that includes alternative Medicare or Medicaid savings.  There can be no assurances that enacted or future budget control mechanisms will not have an adverse impact on the financial condition of our borrowers and lessees, which subsequently could materially adversely impact our company.

        In addition, comprehensiveOn April 1, 2014, President Obama signed into law the Protecting Access to Medicare Act of 2014.  Among other things, the law requires the Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services to develop a skilled nursing facility “value-based purchasing program,” which will tie Medicare payments to skilled nursing facilities to their performance on certain new readmissions measures, applicable to services furnished beginning October 1, 2018.  Furthermore, on October 6, 2014, President Obama signed the Improving Medicare Post-Acute Care Transformation Act of 2014, which requires the collection of standardized post-acute care assessment data, which eventually could be used as the basis for developing changes to Medicare post-acute care reimbursement policy.  Additional reforms affecting the payment for and availability of health care services have been proposed at the state level and adopted by certain states.   Increasingly state Medicaid programs are providing coverage through managed care programs under contracts with private health plans, which is intended to decrease state Medicaid costs.  Congress and state legislatures can be expected to continue to review and assess alternative health care delivery systems and payment methodologies, including potential changes in Medicare and Medicaid payment policy for skilled nursing facility services and other types of post-acute care. Changes in the law, new interpretations of existing laws, or changes in payment methodologies may have a dramatic effect on the definition of permissible or impermissible activities, the relative costs associated with doing business and the amount of reimbursement by the government and other third party payors.

Environmental Matters

Under various federal, state and local environmental laws, ordinances and regulations, an owner of real property or a secured lender (such as us) may be liable for the costs of removal or remediation of hazardous or toxic substances at, under or disposed of in connection with such property, as well as


other potential costs relating to hazardous or toxic substances (including government fines and damages for injuries to persons and adjacent property). Such laws often impose such liability without regard to whether the owner or secured lender knew of, or was responsible for, the presence or disposal of such substances and may be imposed on the owner or secured lender in connection with the activities of an operator of the property. The cost of any required remediation, removal, fines or personal or property damages and the owner'sowner’s or secured lender'slender’s liability therefore could exceed the value of the property, and/or the assets of the owner or secured lender. In addition, the presence of such substances, or the failure to properly dispose of or remediate such substances, may adversely affect the owner'sowner’s ability to sell or rent such property or to borrow using such property as collateral which, in turn, would reduce our revenues.

Although the mortgage loans that we provide and leases covering our properties require the borrower and the lessee to indemnify us for certain environmental liabilities, the scope of such obligations may be limited and we cannot assure that any such borrower or lessee would be able to fulfill its indemnification obligations.

Insurance

11


Table of Contents

Insurance

It is our current policy, and we intend to continue this policy, that all borrowers of funds from us and lessees of any of our properties secure adequate comprehensive property and general and professional liability insurance that covers us as well as the borrower and/or lessee. Even though that is our policy, certain borrowers and lessees have been unable to obtain general and professional liability insurance in the specific amounts required by our leases or mortgages because the cost of such insurance and some insurers have stopped offering such insurance for long term care facilities. Additionally, in the past, insurance companies have filed for bankruptcy protection leaving certain of our borrowers and/or lessees without coverage for periods that were believed to be covered prior to such bankruptcies. The unavailability and associated exposure as well as increased cost of such insurance could have a material adverse effect on the lessees and borrowers, including their ability to make lease or mortgage payments. Although we contend that as a non-possessorynon‑possessory landlord we are not generally responsible for what takes place on real estate we do not possess, claims including general and professional liability claims, may still be asserted against us which may result in costs and exposure for which insurance is not available. Certain risks may be uninsurable, not economically insurable or insurance may not be available and there can be no assurance that we, a borrower or lessee will have adequate funds to cover all contingencies. If an uninsured loss or a loss in excess of insured limits occurs with respect to one or more of our properties, we could be subject to an adverse claim including claims for general or professional liability, could lose the capital that we have invested in the properties, as well as the anticipated future revenue for the properties and, in the case of debt which is with recourse to us, we would remain obligated for any mortgage debt or other financial obligations related to the properties. Certain losses, such as losses due to floods or seismic activity if insurance is available, may be insured subject to certain limitations including large deductibles or co-paymentsco‑payments and policy limits.

Employees

At December 31, 2013,2014, we employed 1819 people. Our employees are not members of any labor union, and we consider our relations with our employees to be excellent.

Taxation of our Company

We have elected to be taxed as a REIT under Sections 856 through 860 of the Internal Revenue Code (or the Code). We believe that we have been organized and have operated in such a manner as to qualify for taxation as a REIT under the Code commencing with our taxable year ending


December 31, 1992. We intend to continue to operate in such a manner, but there is no assurance that we have operated or will continue to operate in a manner so as to qualify or remain qualified.

If we continue to qualify for taxation as a REIT, we generally will not be subject to federal corporate income taxes on our net income that is currently distributed to our stockholders. This treatment substantially eliminates the "double taxation"“double taxation” (once at the corporate level when earned and once at stockholder level when distributed) that generally results from investment in a non-REITnon‑REIT corporation.

However, we will be subject to federal income tax as follows:

First, we will be taxed at regular corporate rates on any undistributed taxable income, including undistributed net capital gains.

Second, under certain circumstances, we may be subject to the alternative minimum tax, if our dividend distributions are less than our alternative minimum taxable income.

Third, if we have (i) net income from the sale or other disposition of foreclosure property which is held primarily for sale to customers in the ordinary course of business or (ii) other non-qualifyingnon‑qualifying income from foreclosure property, we may elect to be subject to tax at the highest corporate rate on such income, if necessary to maintain our REIT status.

Fourth, if we have net income from "prohibited transactions"“prohibited transactions” (as defined below), such income will be subject to a 100% tax.

12


Table of Contents

Fifth, if we fail to satisfy the 75% gross income test or the 95% gross income test (as discussed below), but nonetheless maintain our qualification as a REIT because certain other requirements have been met, we will be subject to a 100% tax on an amount equal to (a) the gross income attributable to the greater of the amount by which we fail the 75% or 95% test multiplied by (b) a fraction intended to reflect our profitability.

Sixth, if we fail to distribute during each calendar year at least the sum of (i) 85% of our ordinary income for such year, (ii) 95% of our REIT capital gain net income for such year, and (iii) any undistributed taxable income from prior periods, we will be subject to a 4% excise tax on the excess of such required distribution over the amounts actually distributed.

Seventh, if we acquire an asset which meets the definition of a built-inbuilt‑in gain asset from a corporation which is or has been a C corporation (i.e., generally a corporation subject to full corporate-levelcorporate‑level tax) in certain transactions in which the basis of the built-inbuilt‑in gain asset in our hands is determined by reference to the basis of the asset in the hands of the C corporation, and if we subsequently recognize gain on the disposition of such asset during the ten-yearten‑year period, called the recognition period, beginning on the date on which we acquired the asset, then, to the extent of the built-inbuilt‑in gain (i.e., the excess of (a) the fair market value of such asset over (b) our adjusted basis in such asset, both determined as of the beginning of the recognition period), such gain will be subject to tax at the highest regular corporate tax rate, pursuant to IRS regulations.

Eighth, if we have taxable REIT subsidiaries and they are required to be reported on a consolidated basis, we would be subject to corporate tax on the taxable income of the taxable REIT subsidiaries. In addition, we will also be subject to a tax of 100% on the amount of any rents from real property, deductions or excess interest paid to us by any of our taxable REIT subsidiaries that would be reduced through reapportionment under certain federal income tax principles in order to more clearly reflect income for the taxable REIT subsidiary.

Ninth, if we fail to satisfy any of the REIT asset tests, as described below, by more than a de minimus amount, due to reasonable cause and we nonetheless maintain our REIT qualification because of specified cure provisions, we will be required to pay a tax equal to the greater of $50,000 or the


highest corporate tax rate multiplied by the net income generated by the non-qualifyingnon‑qualifying assets that caused us to fail such test.

Tenth, if we fail to satisfy any provision of the Code that would result in our failure to qualify as a REIT (other than a violation of the REIT gross income tests or certain violations of the asset tests described below) and the violation is due to reasonable cause, we may retain our REIT qualification but we will be required to pay a penalty of $50,000 for each such failure.

Finally, if we own a residual interest in a real estate mortgage investment conduit (or REMIC), we will be taxed at the highest corporate rate on the portion of any excess inclusion income that we derive from the REMIC residual interests equal to the percentage of our shares that is held in record name by "disqualified“disqualified organization." A "disqualified organization"“disqualified organization” includes the United States, any state or political subdivision thereof, any foreign government or international organization, any agency or instrumentality of any of the foregoing, any rural electrical or telephone cooperative and any tax-exempttax‑ exempt organization (other than a farmer'sfarmer’s cooperative described in Section 521 of the Code) that is exempt from income taxation and from the unrelated business taxable income provisions of the Code. However, to the extent that we own a REMIC residual interest through a taxable REIT subsidiary, we will not be subject to this tax.

Requirements for Qualification.  The Code defines a REIT as a corporation, trust or association:

Contents

(7)

which meets certain other tests, described below, regarding the amount of its distributions and the nature of its income and assets;

(8)

that elects to be a REIT, or has made such election for a previous year, and satisfies the applicable filing and administrative requirements to maintain qualifications as a REIT; and

(9)

that adopts a calendar year accounting period.

The Code provides that conditions (1) to (4), inclusive, must be met during the entire taxable year and that condition (5) must be met during at least 335 days of a taxable year of 12 months, or during a proportionate part of a taxable year of less than 12 months. Conditions (5) and (6) do not apply until after the first taxable year for which an election is made to be taxed as a REIT. For purposes of condition (6), pension funds and certain other entities are treated as individuals, subject to a "look-through"“look‑ through” exception.


Pursuant to the Code and applicable Treasury Regulations, in order to be able to elect to be taxed as a REIT, we must maintain certain records and request certain information from our stockholders designed to disclose the actual ownership of our stock. Based on publicly available information, we believe we have satisfied the share ownership requirements set forth in conditions (5) and (6). In addition, Sections 9.2 and 9.3 of our Charter provide for restrictions regarding the transfer and ownership of shares. These restrictions are intended to assist us in continuing to satisfy the share ownership requirements described in conditions (5) and (6). These restrictions, however, may not ensure that we will, in all cases, be able to satisfy the share ownership requirements described in conditions (5) and (6).

We have complied with, and will continue to comply with, regulatory rules to send annual letters to certain of our stockholders requesting information regarding the actual ownership of our stock. If despite sending the annual letters, we do not know, or after exercising reasonable diligence would not have known, whether we failed to satisfy the ownership requirement set forth in condition (6) above, we will be treated as having satisfied such condition. If we fail to comply with these regulatory rules, we will be subject to a monetary penalty. If our failure to comply was due to intentional disregard of the requirement, the penalty would be increased. However, if our failure to comply was due to reasonable cause and not willful neglect, no penalty would be imposed.

Income Tests.  There presently are two gross income requirements that we must satisfy to qualify as a REIT:

·

First, at least 75% of our gross income (excluding gross income from “prohibited transactions,” as defined below) for each taxable year must be derived directly or indirectly from investments relating to real property or mortgages on real property, including rents from real property, or from certain types of temporary investment income.

·

Second, at least 95% of our gross income for each taxable year must be directly or indirectly derived from income that qualifies under the 75% test, and from dividends (including dividends from taxable REIT subsidiaries), interest and gain from the sale or other disposition of stock or securities.

Cancellation of indebtedness income generated by us is not taken into account in applying the 75% and 95% income tests discussed above. A "prohibited transaction"“prohibited transaction” is a sale or other disposition of property (other than foreclosure property) held for sale to customers in the ordinary course of business. Any gain realized from a prohibited transaction is subject to a 100% penalty tax.

Rents received by us will qualify as "rents“rents from real property"property” for purposes of satisfying the gross income tests for a REIT only if several conditions are met:

Contents

taxable REIT subsidiary and certain other requirements are met with respect to the real property being rented.


·

If rent attributable to personal property leased in connection with a lease of real property is greater than 15% of the total rent received under the lease, then the portion of rent attributable to the personal property will not qualify as rents from real property.

For taxable years beginning after August 5, 1997, a REIT has been permitted to render a de minimus amount of impermissible services to tenants and still treat amounts received with respect to that property as rents from real property. The amount received or accrued by the REIT during the taxable year for the impermissible services with respect to a property may not exceed 1% of all amounts received or accrued by the REIT directly or indirectly from the property. If the amount received or accrued by the REIT during the taxable year for impermissible services with respect to a property exceeds 1% of the total amounts received or accrued with respect to such property, then none of the rents received or accrued from such property shall be treated as rents from real property. The amount received for any service or management operation for this purpose shall be deemed to be not less than 150% of the direct cost of the REIT in furnishing or rendering the service or providing the management or operation. Furthermore, impermissible services may be furnished to tenants by a taxable REIT subsidiary subject to certain conditions, and we may still treat rents received with respect to the property as rent from real property.

The term "interest"“interest” generally does not include any amount if the determination of the amount depends in whole or in part on the income or profits of any person, although an amount generally will not be excluded from the term "interest"“interest” solely by reason of being based on a fixed percentage of receipts or sales.

If we fail to satisfy one or both of the 75% or 95% gross income tests for any taxable year, we may nevertheless qualify as a REIT for the year if we are eligible for relief. These relief provisions will be generally available if our failure to meet the tests was due to reasonable cause and not due to wilfulwillful neglect and following the identification of the failure to satisfy one or both income tests, a description of each item of gross income is filed in accordance with IRS regulations.

It is not now possible to determine the circumstances under which we may be entitled to the benefit of these relief provisions. If these relief provisions apply, a 100% tax is imposed on an amount equal to (a) the gross income attributable to the greater of the amount by which we failed the 75% or 95% test, multiplied by (b) a fraction intended to reflect our profitability.

Asset Tests.  At the close of each quarter of our taxable year, we must also satisfy several tests relating to the nature and diversification of our assets. At least 75% of the value of our total assets must be represented by real estate assets, cash, cash items (including receivables arising in the ordinary course of our operations), and government securities and qualified temporary investments. Although the remaining 25% of our assets generally may be invested without restriction, we are prohibited from owning securities representing more than 10% of either the vote or value of the outstanding securities of any issuer other than a qualified REIT subsidiary, another REIT or a taxable REIT subsidiary (the "10%“10% vote and value test"test”). Further, no more than 25% of our total assets may be represented by securities of one or more taxable REIT subsidiaries (for tax years beginning prior to July 30, 2008, 20% of the total value of our assets) and no more than 5% of the value of our total assets may be represented by securities of any non-governmentalnon‑governmental issuer other than a qualified REIT subsidiary, another REIT or a taxable REIT subsidiary (or TRS). Each of the 10% vote and value test and the 25% and 5% asset tests must be satisfied at the end of any quarter. There are special rules which provide relief if the value related tests are not satisfied due to changes in the value of the assets of a REIT.

Investments in Taxable REIT Subsidiaries.  For taxable years beginning after December 1, 2000, REITs may own more than 10% of the voting and value of securities in a TRS. A TRS is a corporation other than a REIT in which a REIT directly or indirectly holds stock, and that has made a joint election with the REIT to be treated as a TRS. A TRS

15


Table of Contents

also includes any corporation other than a REIT with respect to which a TRS owns securities possessing more that 35% of the total voting power


or value of the outstanding securities of such corporation. Other than some activities relating to lodging and health care facilities, a TRS may generally engage in any business, including the provision of customary or non-customarynon‑customary services to tenants of its parent REIT. A TRS is subject to income tax as a regular C corporation. In addition, a TRS may be prevented from deducting interest on debt funded directly or indirectly by its parent REIT if certain tests regarding the TRS'sTRS’s debt to equity ratio and interest expense are not satisfied. A REIT'sREIT’s ownership of a TRS will not be subject to the 10% or 5% asset tests described above, and its operations will be subject to the provisions described above. At this time, we do not have any taxable REIT subsidiaries.

REMIC.  A regular or residual interest in a REMIC will be treated as a real estate asset for purposes of the REIT asset tests, and income derived with respect to such interest will be treated as interest on an obligation secured by a mortgage on real property, assuming that at least 95% of the assets of the REMIC are real estate assets. If less than 95% of the assets of the REMIC are real estate assets, only a proportionate share of the assets of and income derived from the REMIC will be treated as qualifying under the REIT asset and income tests. All of our historical REMIC certificates were secured by real estate assets, therefore we believe that our historic REMIC interests fully qualified for purposes of the REIT income and asset tests.

Ownership of Interests in Partnerships, Limited Liability Companies and Qualified REIT Subsidiaries.  We own interests in various partnerships and limited liabilities companies. In the case of a REIT which is a partner in a partnership, or a member in a limited liability company treated as a partnership for federal income tax purposes, Treasury Regulations provide that the REIT will be deemed to own its proportionate share of the assets of the partnership or limited liability company, based on its interest in partnership capital, subject to special rules relating to the 10% REIT asset test described above. Also, the REIT will be deemed to be entitled to its proportionate share of income of that entity. The assets and items of gross income of the partnership or limited liability company retain the same character in the hands of the REIT for purposes of Section 856 of the Code, including satisfying the gross income tests and the asset tests. Thus, our proportionate share of the assets and items of income of partnerships and limited liability companies taxed as partnerships, in which we are, directly or indirectly through other partnerships or limited liability companies taxed as partnerships, a partner or member, are treated as our assets and items of income for purposes of applying the REIT qualification requirements described in this Annual Report on Form 10-K10‑K (including the income and asset tests previously described).

We also own interests in a number of subsidiaries which are intended to be treated as qualified REIT subsidiaries. The Code provides that such subsidiaries will be ignored for federal income tax purposes and that all assets, liabilities and items of income, deduction and credit of such subsidiaries will be treated as assets, liabilities and such items of our company. If any partnership or qualified real estate investment trust subsidiary in which we own an interest were treated as a regular corporation (and not as a partnership or qualified real estate investment trust subsidiary) for federal income tax purposes, we would likely fail to satisfy the REIT asset test prohibiting a REIT from owning greater than 10% of the voting power of the stock or value of securities of any issuer, as described above, and would therefore fail to qualify as a REIT. We believe that each of the partnerships and subsidiaries in which we own an interest will be treated for tax purposes as a partnership or qualified REIT subsidiary, respectively, although no assurance can be given that the IRS will not successfully challenge the status of any such entity.


Annual Distribution Requirements.  In order to qualify as a REIT, we are required to distribute dividends (other than capital gain dividends) to our stockholders annually in an amount at least equal to:

(1)

the sum of:

(a)

90% of our “real estate investment trust taxable income” (computed without regard to the dividends paid deduction and our net capital gain); and

(b)

90% of the net income, if any (after tax), from foreclosure property; minus

(2)

the excess of certain items of non‑cash income over 5% of our real estate investment trust taxable income.

In addition, if we dispose of any asset we acquired from a corporation which is or has been a C corporation in a transaction in which our basis in the asset is determined by reference to the basis of the asset in the hands of that C corporation, within the ten-yearten‑year period following our acquisition of such asset, we would be required to distribute at least

16


Table of Contents

90% of the after-taxafter‑tax gain, if any, we recognized on the disposition of the asset, to the extent that gain does not exceed the excess of (a) the fair market value of the asset on the date we acquired the asset over (b) our adjusted basis in the asset on the date we acquired the asset.

We must pay these annual distributions (1) in the taxable year to which they relate or (2) in the following year if (i) we pay these distributions during January to stockholders of record in either October, November, or December of the prior year or (ii) we elect to declare the dividend before the due date of the tax return (including extensions) and pay on or before the first regular dividend payment date after such declaration.

Amounts distributed must not be preferential; that is, every stockholder of the class of stock with respect to which a distribution is made must be treated the same as every other stockholder of that class, and no class of stock may be treated otherwise than in accordance with its dividend rights as a class.

To the extent that we do not distribute all of our net long term capital gain or distribute at least 90% but less than 100%, of our "real“real estate investment trust taxable income," as adjusted, we will be subject to tax on such amounts at regular corporate tax rates. Furthermore, if we should fail to distribute during each calendar year (or, in the case of distributions with declaration and record dates in the last three months of the calendar year, by the end of the following January) at least the sum of:

(1)

85% of our real estate investment trust ordinary income for such year,

(2)

95% of our real estate investment trust capital gain net income for such year, and

(3)

100% of taxable income from prior periods less 100% of distributions from prior periods

We would be subject to a 4% excise tax on the excess of such required distributions over the amounts actually distributed. Any real estate investment trust taxable income and net capital gain on which this excise tax is imposed for any year is treated as an amount distributed during that year for purposes of calculating such tax.

We intend to make timely distributions sufficient to satisfy these annual distribution requirements and to avoid the imposition of the 4% excise tax.

Failure to Qualify.  If we fail to qualify for taxation as a REIT in any taxable year, and certain relief provisions do not apply, we will be subject to tax (including any applicable alternative minimum tax) on our taxable income at regular corporate rates. Distributions to stockholders in any year in which we fail to qualify as a REIT will not be deductible by us, nor will any distributions be required to be made. Unless entitled to relief under specific statutory provisions, we will also be disqualified from


re-electing re‑electing our REIT status for the four taxable years following the year during which qualification was lost. It is not possible to state whether we would be entitled to the statutory relief in all circumstances. Failure to qualify as a REIT for even one year could substantially reduce distributions to stockholders and could result in our incurring substantial indebtedness (to the extent borrowings are feasible) or liquidating substantial investments in order to pay the resulting taxes.

State and local taxation.  We may be subject to state or local taxation in various state or local jurisdictions, including those in which we transact business or reside. The state and local tax treatment of our Company may not conform to the federal income tax consequences discussed above.

Investor Information

We make available to the public free of charge through our internet website our Annual Report on Form 10-K,10‑K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q,10‑Q, Current Reports on Form 8-K,8‑K, and amendments to those reports filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, as soon as reasonably practicable after we electronically file such reports with, or furnish such reports to, the Securities and Exchange Commission (or SEC). Our internet website address iswww.LTCProperties.com.www.LTCreit.com. We are not including the information contained on our website as part of, or incorporating it by reference into, this Annual Report on Form 10-K.10‑K.

17


Table of Contents

Posted on our websitewww.LTCProperties.comwww.LTCreit.com under the "Corporate Governance"“Corporate Governance” section under the “Investors” heading are our Audit Committee, Compensation Committee and Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee Charters, our Corporate Governance Policies, and Code of Business Conduct and Ethics governing our directors, officers and employees. Within the time period required by the SEC and the New York Stock Exchange (or NYSE), we will post on our website any amendment to the Code of Business Conduct and Ethics and any waiver applicable to our Principal Executive Officer, Principal Financial Officer, Principal Accounting Officer or Directors. In addition, our website under the heading "SEC Filings"“SEC Filings” includes information concerning purchases and sales of our equity securities by our executive officers and directors.

You may read and copy materials that we file with the SEC at the SEC'sSEC’s Public Reference Room at 100 F Street, N.E., Washington D.C. 20549, on official business days during the hours of 10:00 am to 3:00 pm Eastern Standard Time.20549. Information on the operation of the Public Reference Room is available by calling the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330.1‑800‑SEC‑0330. The SEC maintains an Internet site that contains reports, proxy statements and other information we file. The address of the SEC website iswww.sec.gov.

You also may contact our Investor Relations Department at:

LTC Properties, Inc.

2829 Townsgate Road, Suite 350

Westlake Village, California 91361

Attn: Investor Relations

(805) 981-8655981‑8655

Item 1A.  RISK FACTORS
FACTOR
S

        The following discussion ofThis section discusses risk factors contains "forward-looking statements"that may affect our business, operations, and financial condition. If any of these risks, as well as other risks and uncertainties that we have not yet identified or that we currently think are not material, actually occur, we could be materially adversely affected and the value of our securities could decline. In addition, these risk factors contain “forward‑looking statements” as discussed above under the heading "Cautionary“Cautionary Statement." These risk factors may be important to understanding any statement in this Annual Report on Form 10-K or elsewhere. The following information should be read in conjunction with Management'sManagement’s Discussion and Analysis, and the consolidated financial statements and related notes in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.10‑ K.

A Failure to Maintain or Increase our Dividend Could Reduce the Market Price of Our Stock.  The ability to maintain or raise our common dividend is dependent, to a large part, on growth of funds


available for distribution. This growth in turn depends upon increased revenues from additional investments and loans, rental increases and mortgage rate increases.

At Times, We May Have Limited Access to Capital Which Will Slow Our Growth.  A REIT is required to make dividend distributions and retains little cash flow for growth. As a result, growth for a REIT is generally through the steady investment of new capital in real estate assets. There may be times when we will have limited access to capital from the equity and/or debt markets. During such periods, virtually all of our available capital would be required to meet existing commitments and to reduce existing debt. We may not be able, during such periods, to obtain additional equity and/or debt capital or dispose of assets on favorable terms, if at all, at the time we require additional capital to acquire health care properties on a competitive basis or meet our obligations. At December 31, 2013,2014, we had $6.8$25.2 million of cash on hand $219.0and $400.0 million available under our unsecured revolving line of credit, and $30.0 million available under the uncommitted private shelf agreement for our senior unsecured notes.credit. Subsequent to December 31, 2013,2014, we borrowed $11.5$18.0 million and, therefore, have $207.5 million available under orour unsecured revolving line of credit. We alsoAccordingly, we have the potential ability$18.0 million outstanding with $382.0 million available for borrowing. Also, we have $775.1 million available under our effective shelf registration to access the capital markets through the issuance of debt and/or equity securities under our $800.0 million effective shelf registration.securities. As a result, we believe our liquidity and various sources of available capital are sufficient to fund operations and development commitments, meet debt service obligations (both principal and interest), make dividend distributions and finance some future investments should we determine such future investments are financially feasible.

Income and Returns from Health Care Facilities Can be Volatile.  The possibility that the health care properties in which we invest will not generate income sufficient to meet operating expenses, will generate income and capital appreciation, if any, at rates lower than those anticipated or will yield returns lower than those available through investments in comparable real estate or other investments are additional risks of investing in health care related real estate. Income from properties and yields from investments in such properties may be affected by many factors,

18


Table of Contents

including changes in governmental regulation (such as zoning laws and government payment), general or local economic conditions (such as fluctuations in interest rates and employment conditions), the available local supply of and demand for improved real estate, a reduction in rental income as the result of an inability to maintain occupancy levels, natural disasters (such as hurricanes, earthquakes and floods) or similar factors.

We Depend on Lease Income and Mortgage Payments from Real Property.  Approximately 99.5% of our revenue for the year ended December 31, 2013,2014, was derived from lease income and mortgage payments from real property. Our revenue would be adversely affected if a significant number of our borrowers or lessees were unable to meet their obligations to us or if we were unable to lease our properties or make mortgage loans on economically favorable terms. There can be no assurance that any lessee will exercise its option to renew its lease upon the expiration of the initial term. There can be no assurance that if such failure to renew were to occur, or if we did not re-leasere‑lease a property to a current lessee, we could lease the property to others on favorable terms, at the same rent as the current rent, or on a timely basis.

We Rely on our Operators.  Substantially all of our revenues and sources of cash flows from operations are derived from operating lease rentals and interest earned on outstanding loans receivable. Our investments in mortgage loans and owned properties represent our primary source of liquidity to fund distributions and are dependent upon the performance of the operators on their lease and loan obligations and the rates earned thereon. Our financial position and ability to make distributions may be adversely affected by financial difficulties experienced by any of our lessees or borrowers, including bankruptcies, inability to emerge from bankruptcy, insolvency or general downturn in business of any such operator, or in the event any such operator does not renew and/or extend its relationship with us or our borrowers when it expires.


Our Borrowers and Lessees Face Competition in the Health Care Industry.Industry. The long term care industry is highly competitive and we expect that it may become more competitive in the future. Our borrowers and lessees are competing with numerous other companies providing similar long term care services or alternatives such as home health agencies, hospices, life care at home, community-based service programs, retirement communities and convalescent centers. There can be no assurance that our borrowers and lessees will not encounter increased competition in the future which could limit their ability to attract residents or expand their businesses and therefore affect their ability to make their debt or lease payments to us.

The Health Care Industry is Heavily Regulated by the Government.Government. Our borrowers and lessees who operate health care facilities are subject to extensive regulation by federal, state and local governments. These laws and regulations are subject to frequent and substantial changes resulting from legislation, adoption of rules and regulations, and administrative and judicial interpretations of existing law. These changes may have a dramatic effect on the definition of permissible or impermissible activities, the relative costs associated with doing business and the amount of reimbursement by both government and other third-party payors. These changes may be applied retroactively. The ultimate timing or effect of these changes cannot be predicted. The failure of any borrower of funds from us or lessee of any of our properties to comply with such laws, requirements and regulations could affect its ability to operate its facility or facilities and could adversely affect such borrower'sborrower’s or lessee'slessee’s ability to make debt or lease payments to us.

In March 2010, the President signed into law the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, which subsequently was amended by the Health Care and Education and Reconciliation Act of 2010 (collectively referred to as the "Affordable“Affordable Care Act"Act”).  The Affordable Care Act is designed to expand access to affordable health insurance, contain health care costs, and institute a variety of health policy reforms.  The provisions of the sweeping law may affect us directly, as well as impact our lessees and borrowers.  While certain provisions, such as expanding the insured population, may positively impact the revenues of our lessees and borrowers, other provisions, particularly those intended to reduce federal health care spending, could have a negative impact on our lessees and borrowers.  Among other things, the Affordable Care Act: reduces Medicare skilled nursing facility reimbursement by a so-called "productivity adjustment"“productivity adjustment” based on economy-wide productivity gains beginning in fiscal year 2012; requires the development of a value-based purchasing program for Medicare skilled nursing facility services; establishes a national voluntary pilot program to bundle Medicare payments for hospital and post-acute services that could lead to changes in the delivery of post-acute services; and provides incentives to state Medicaid programs to promote community-based care as an alternative to institutional long term care services.  The Affordable Care Act also includes provisions intended to expand public disclosure about nursing home ownership and operations, institute mandatory compliance and quality assurance programs, increase penalties for noncompliance, and expand fraud and abuse enforcement and penalty provisions that could impact our operators.  In addition, the Affordable

19


Table of Contents

Care Act impacts both us and our lessees and borrowers as employers, including new requirements related to the health insurance we offer to our respective employees.  Many aspects of the Affordable Care Act are being implemented through new regulations and subregulatory guidance. We cannot predict at this time what effect, if any, the various provisions of the Affordable Care Act will have on our lessees and borrowers or our business. There can be no assurances, however, that the Affordable Care Act will not adversely impact the operations, cash flows or financial condition of our lessees and borrowers, which subsequently could materially adversely impact our revenue and operations.

Additional reforms affecting the payment for and availability of health care services have been proposed at the state level and adopted by certain states.   Congress and state legislatures can be expected to continue to review and assess alternative health care delivery systems and payment methodologies along with other cost-control measures.  For instance, under the terms of the Budget Control Act of 2011, as modified by the American Taxpayer Relief Act, President Obama issued a


sequestration order on March 1, 2013 that mandates a 2% cut to Medicare payments to providers and health plans.  The cuts generally apply to Medicare fee-for-service claims with dates-of-service or dates-of-discharge on or after April 1, 2013.  Under current law, asAs amended by subsequent legislation, the Bipartisan Budget Act of 2013,Medicare sequestration will lastcuts are currently scheduled to be applied through fiscal year 2023,2024, although Congress and the Administration could enact alternative budget legislation at any time that would end or modify sequestration. These and other changes in the law, new interpretations of existing laws, or changes in payment methodologies may have a dramatic effect on the definition of permissible or impermissible activities, the relative costs associated with doing business and the amount of reimbursement by the government and other third party payors.

Federal and State Health Care Cost Containment Measures Including Reductions in Reimbursement From Third Party Payors Such as Medicare and Medicaid Could Adversely Affect Us and The Ability of Our Tenants to Make Payments to Us. The ability of our borrowers and lessees to generate revenue and profit determines the underlying value of that property to us. Revenues of our borrowers and skilled nursing property lessees are generally derived from payments for patient care. Sources of such payments include the federal Medicare program, state Medicaid programs, private insurance carriers, health care service plans, health maintenance organizations, preferred provider arrangements, self-insured employers, as well as the patients themselves.themselves.

The health care industry continues to face increased government and private payor pressure on health care providers to control costs. Certain of these initiatives have had the result of limiting Medicare and Medicaid reimbursement for nursing facility services.  In particular, the establishment of a Medicare prospective payment system for skilled nursing facility services to replace the cost-based reimbursement system significantly reduced Medicare reimbursement to skilled nursing facility providers.  While Congress subsequently took steps to mitigate the impact of the prospective payment system on skilled nursing facilities, other federal legislative and regulatory policies have been adopted and may continue to be proposed that would reduce Medicare and/or Medicaid payments to nursing facilities.  Moreover, states are facingstate budget pressures continue to result in lightadoption of the current economic conditions, prompting consideration andMedicaid provider payment reductions in some cases adoption of cuts in state Medicaid payments to providers.states.  No assurances can be given that any additional Medicare or Medicaid legislation or regulatory policies adopted by the federal government or the states would not reduce Medicare or Medicaid reimbursement to nursing facilities or result in additional costs for operators of nursing facilities.

Congress also has given states greater flexibility to expand access to home and community based services as an alternative to nursing facility services.  These provisions could further increase state funding for home and community based services, while prompting states to cut funding for nursing facilities and homes for persons with disabilities.  In light of continuing state Medicaid program reforms, budget cuts, and regulatory initiatives, no assurance can be given that the implementation of such regulations and reforms will not have a material adverse effect on the financial condition or results of operations of our lessees and/or borrowers which, in turn, could affect their ability to meet their contractual obligations to us.

We Could Incur More Debt.  We operate with a policy of incurring debt when, in the opinion of our Board of Directors, it is advisable. We may incur additional debt by borrowing under our unsecured revolving line of credit or the uncommitted private shelf agreement, mortgaging properties we own and/or issuing debt securities in a public offering or in a private transaction. Accordingly, we could become more highly leveraged. The degree of leverage could have important consequences to stockholders, including affecting our ability to obtain, in the future, additional financing for working capital, capital expenditures, acquisitions, development or other general corporate purposes and making us more vulnerable to a downturn in business or the economy generally.

20


Table of Contents

We Could Fail to Collect Amounts Due Under Our Straight-lineStraight‑line Rent Receivable Asset.  Straight-lineStraight‑line accounting requires us to calculate the total rent we will receive as a fixed amount over the life of the


lease and recognize that revenue evenly over that life. In a situation where a lease calls for fixed rental increases during the life of the lease, rental income recorded in the early years of a lease is higher than the actual cash rent received which creates an asset on the consolidated balance sheet called straight-linestraight‑line rent receivable. At some point during the lease, depending on the rent levels and terms, this reverses and the cash rent payments received during the later years of the lease are higher than the rental income recognized which reduces the straight-linestraight‑line rent receivable balance to zero by the end of the lease. We periodically assess the collectability of the straight-linestraight‑line rent receivable. If during our assessment we determined that we were unlikely to collect a portion or the entire straight-linestraight‑line rent receivable asset, we may provide a reserve against the previously recognized straight-linestraight‑line rent receivable asset for a portion or up to its full value that we estimate may not be recoverable.

Our Assets May be Subject to Impairment Charges.  We periodically but not less than quarterly evaluate our real estate investments and other assets for impairment indicators. The judgment regarding the existence of impairment indicators is based on factors such as market conditions, operator performance and legal structure. If we determine that a significant impairment has occurred, we would be required to make an adjustment to the net carrying value of the asset which could have a material adverse affect on our results of operations and a non-cashnon‑cash impact on funds from operations in the period in which the write-offwrite‑off occurs.

A Failure to Reinvest Cash Available to Us Could Adversely Affect Our Future Revenues and Our Ability to Increase Dividends to Stockholders; There is Considerable Competition in Our Market for Attractive Investments.  From time to time, we will have cash available from (1) proceeds of sales of shares of securities, (2) proceeds from new debt issuances, (3) principal payments on our mortgages and other investments, (4) sale of properties, and (5) funds from operations. We may reinvest this cash in health care investments and in accordance with our investment policies, repay outstanding debt or invest in qualified short term or long term investments. We compete for real estate investments with a broad variety of potential investors. The competition for attractive investments negatively affects our ability to make timely investments on acceptable terms. Delays in acquiring properties or making loans will negatively impact revenues and perhaps our ability to increase distributions to our stockholders.

Our Failure to Qualify as a REIT Would Have Serious Adverse Consequences to Our Stockholders.  We intend to operate so as to qualify as a REIT under the Code. We believe that we have been organized and have operated in a manner which would allow us to qualify as a REIT under the Code beginning with our taxable year ended December 31, 1992. However, it is possible that we have been organized or have operated in a manner which would not allow us to qualify as a REIT, or that our future operations could cause us to fail to qualify. Qualification as a REIT requires us to satisfy numerous requirements (some on an annual and quarterly basis) established under highly technical and complex Code provisions for which there are only limited judicial and administrative interpretations, and involves the determination of various factual matters and circumstances not entirely within our control. For example, in order to qualify as a REIT, at least 95% of our gross income in any year must be derived from qualifying sources, and we must pay dividends to stockholders aggregating annually at least 90% (95% for taxable years ending prior to January 1, 2001) of our REIT taxable income (determined without regard to the dividends paid deduction and by excluding capital gains). Legislation, new regulations, administrative interpretations or court decisions could significantly change the tax laws with respect to qualification as a REIT or the federal income tax consequences of such qualification.

If we fail to qualify as a REIT in any taxable year, we will be subject to federal income tax (including any applicable alternative minimum tax) on our taxable income at regular corporate rates. Unless we are entitled to relief under statutory provisions, we would be disqualified from treatment as a REIT for the four taxable years following the year during which we lost qualification. If we lose our REIT status, our net earnings available for investment or distribution to stockholders would be


significantly reduced for each of the years involved. In addition, we would no longer be required to make distributions to stockholders.

Provisions in Our Articles of Incorporation May Limit Ownership of Shares of Our Capital Stock.  In order for us to qualify as a REIT, no more than 50% in value of the outstanding shares of our stock may be beneficially owned, directly or indirectly, by five or fewer individuals at any time during the last half of each taxable year. To ensure qualification under this test, our Articles of Incorporation provide that, subject to exceptions, no person may beneficially own more than 9.8% of outstanding shares of any class or series of our stock, including our common stock. Our Board of Directors may exempt a person from the 9.8% ownership limit upon such conditions as the Board of Directors may

21


Table of Contents

direct. However, our Board of Directors may not grant an exemption from the 9.8% ownership limit if it would result in the termination of our status as a REIT. Shares of capital stock in excess of the 9.8% ownership limitation that lack an applicable exemption may lose rights to dividends and voting, and may be subject to redemption. As a result of the limitations on ownership set forth in our Articles of Incorporation, acquisition of any shares of capital stock that would result in our disqualification as a REIT may be limited or void. The 9.8% ownership limitation also may have the effect of delaying, deferring, or preventing a change in control of us, including an extraordinary transaction (such as a merger, tender offer or sale of all or substantially all of our assets) that might provide a premium price for holders of our capital stock.

Our Real Estate Investments are Relatively Illiquid.  Real estate investments are relatively illiquid and, therefore, tend to limit our ability to vary our portfolio promptly in response to changes in economic or other conditions. All of our properties are "special purpose"“special purpose” properties that cannot be readily converted to general residential, retail or office use. Health care facilities that participate in Medicare or Medicaid must meet extensive program requirements, including physical plant and operational requirements, which are revised from time to time. Such requirements may include a duty to admit Medicare and Medicaid patients, limiting the ability of the facility to increase its private pay census beyond certain limits. Medicare and Medicaid facilities are regularly inspected to determine compliance, and may be excluded from the programs—in some cases without a prior hearing—for failure to meet program requirements. Transfers of operations of nursing homes and other health care-relatedcare‑related facilities are subject to regulatory approvals not required for transfers of other types of commercial operations and other types of real estate. Thus, if the operation of any of our properties becomes unprofitable due to competition, age of improvements or other factors such that our lessee or borrower becomes unable to meet its obligations on the lease or mortgage loan, the liquidation value of the property may be substantially less than the net book value or the amount owing on any related mortgage loan, than would be the case if the property were readily adaptable to other uses. The receipt of liquidation proceeds or the replacement of an operator that has defaulted on its lease or loan could be delayed by the approval process of any federal, state or local agency necessary for the transfer of the property or the replacement of the operator with a new operator licensed to manage the facility. In addition, certain significant expenditures associated with real estate investment, such as real estate taxes and maintenance costs, are generally not reduced when circumstances cause a reduction in income from the investment. Should such events occur, our income and cash flows from operations would be adversely affected.

Our Remedies May Be Limited When Mortgage Loans Default.  To the extent we invest in mortgage loans, such mortgage loans may or may not be recourse obligations of the borrower and generally will not be insured or guaranteed by governmental agencies or otherwise. In the event of a default under such obligations, we may have to foreclose on the property underlying the mortgage or protect our interest by acquiring title to a property and thereafter make substantial improvements or repairs in order to maximize the property'sproperty’s investment potential. Borrowers may contest enforcement of foreclosure or other remedies, seek bankruptcy protection against such enforcement and/or bring claims for lender liability in response to actions to enforce mortgage obligations. If a borrower seeks bankruptcy protection, the Bankruptcy Court may impose an automatic stay that would preclude us


from enforcing foreclosure or other remedies against the borrower. Declines in the value of the property may prevent us from realizing an amount equal to our mortgage loan upon foreclosure.

We are Subject to Risks and Liabilities in Connection with Properties Owned Through Limited Liability Companies and Partnerships.  In prior years, we had ownership interests in limited liability companies and partnerships. We may make additional investments through these ventures in the future. Partnership or limited liability company investments may involve risks such as the following:

Contents

·

agreements governing limited liability companies and partnerships often contain restrictions on the transfer of a member’s or partner’s interest or “buy‑sell” or other provisions which may result in a purchase or sale of the interest at a disadvantageous time or on disadvantageous terms.

We will, however, generally seek to maintain sufficient control of our partnerships and limited liability companies to permit us to achieve our business objectives. Our organizational documents do not limit the amount of available funds that we may invest in partnerships or limited liability companies. The occurrence of one or more of the events described above could have a direct and adverse impact on us.

Risks Associated with Property Development that Can Render a Project Less Profitable or Not Profitable, and, Under Certain Circumstances, Prevent Completion of Development Activities Undertaken.  Our business includes development of senior housing and long term care properties. We currently have six parcels of land under development. Ground up development presents additional risk, including but not limited to the following:

·

a development opportunity may be abandoned after expending significant resources resulting in the loss of deposits or failure to recover expenses already incurred;

·

the development and construction costs of a project may exceed original estimates due to increased interest rates and higher materials, transportation, labor, leasing or other costs, which could make completion of the development project less profitable;

·

construction and/or permanent financing may not be available on favorable terms or at all;

·

the project may not be completed on schedule, which can result in increases in construction costs and debt service expenses as a result of a variety of factors that are beyond our control, including natural disasters, labor conditions, material shortages, regulatory hurdles, civil unrest and acts of war; and

·

occupancy rates and rents at a newly completed property may not meet expected levels and could be insufficient to make the property profitable.

These risks could result in substantial unanticipated delays or expenses and, under certain circumstances, could prevent completion of development activities once undertaken, any of which could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.

Item 1B.  UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS
COMMENT
S

None.


23


Table of Contents

Item 2.  PROPERTIES
PROPERTIE
S

Here and throughout this Form 10-K10‑K wherever we provide details of our properties'properties’ bed/unit count, the number of beds/units applies to skilled nursing, assisted living, independent living and memory care properties only. This number is based upon unit/bed counts shown on operating licenses provided to us by lessees/borrowers or units/beds as stipulated by lease/mortgage documents. We have found during the years that these numbers often differ, usually not materially, from units/beds in operation at any point in time. The differences are caused by such things as operators converting a patient/resident room for alternative uses, such as offices or storage, or converting a multi-patientmulti‑patient room/unit into a single patient room/unit. We monitor our properties on a routine basis through site visits and reviews of current licenses. In an instance where such change would cause a de-licensingde‑licensing of beds or in our opinion impact the value of the property, we would take action against the lessee/borrower to preserve the value of the property/collateral.

Owned Properties.  The following table sets forth certain information regarding our owned properties as of December 31, 20132014 (dollars amounts in thousands):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    

 

    

 

    

 

    

 

    

 

    

 

    

 

 

    

Remaining

    

 

 

 

 

 

No. of

 

No. of

 

No. of

 

No. of

 

No. of

 

No. of

 

 

 

 

Lease

 

Gross

 

Location

 

SNFs

 

ALFs

 

ROCs

 

UDPs

 

Others

 

Beds/Units

 

Encumbrances

 

Term(1)

 

Investment

 

Alabama

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

459 

 

$

 —

 

82 

 

$

18,622 

 

Arizona

 

 

 —

 

 —

 

 —

 

 —

 

907 

 

 

 —

 

56 

 

 

36,091 

 

California

 

 

 

 —

 

 —

 

 —

 

508 

 

 

 —

 

71 

 

 

48,719 

 

Colorado

 

 

12 

 

 

 —

(2)

 —

 

920 

 

 

 —

 

98 

 

 

109,859 

 

Florida

 

 

 

 —

 

 —

 

 —

 

961 

 

 

 —

 

77 

 

 

71,011 

 

Georgia

 

 

 —

 

 —

 

 —

 

 —

 

257 

 

 

 —

 

112 

 

 

4,860 

 

Illinois

 

 —

 

 —

 

 —

 

 —

(3)

 —

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 —

 

 

2,076 

 

Indiana

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 —

 

 —

 

140 

 

 

 —

 

40 

 

 

9,856 

 

Iowa

 

 

 

 

 —

 

 —

 

579 

 

 

 —

 

71 

 

 

17,422 

 

Kansas

 

 

 

 —

 

 —

 

 —

 

461 

 

 

 —

 

92 

 

 

31,256 

 

Kentucky

 

 

 —

 

 —

 

 —

 

 —

 

143 

 

 

 —

 

151 

 

 

21,716 

 

Michigan

 

 —

 

 —

 

 —

 

 —

 

 —

(4)

 —

 

 

 —

 

 —

 

 

1,613 

 

Mississippi

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 —

 

 —

 

62 

 

 

 —

 

20 

 

 

9,430 

 

Nebraska

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 —

 

 —

 

157 

 

 

 —

 

 —

 

 

9,332 

 

New Jersey

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 —

 

 

205 

 

 

 —

 

133 

 

 

70,667 

 

New Mexico

 

 

 —

 

 —

 

 —

 

 —

 

843 

 

 

 —

 

66 

 

 

50,622 

 

N. Carolina

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 —

 

 —

 

210 

 

 

 —

 

72 

 

 

13,096 

 

Ohio

 

 

11 

 

 —

 

 —

 

 —

 

772 

 

 

 —

 

96 

 

 

98,647 

 

Oklahoma

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 —

 

 —

 

219 

 

 

 —

 

72 

 

 

12,315 

 

Oregon

 

 

 

 —

 

 —

 

 —

 

135 

 

 

 —

 

12 

 

 

6,828 

 

Pennsylvania

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 —

 

 —

 

199 

 

 

 —

 

63 

 

 

18,040 

 

S. Carolina

 

 —

 

 

 

 —

 

 —

 

339 

 

 

 —

 

73 

 

 

19,800 

 

Tennessee

 

 

 —

 

 —

 

 —

 

 —

 

141 

 

 

 —

 

108 

 

 

5,236 

 

Texas

 

24 

 

15 

 

 

 —

 

 —

 

4,251 

 

 

 —

 

105 

 

 

225,647 

 

Virginia

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 —

 

500 

 

 

 —

 

101 

 

 

29,052 

 

Washington

 

 

 —

 

 —

 

 —

 

 —

 

123 

 

 

 —

 

19 

 

 

8,025 

 

TOTAL

 

68 

 

84 

 

 

 —

 

 

13,491 

 

$

 —

 

90 

 

$

949,838 

 


(1)

Weighted average remaining months in lease term as of December 31, 2014.

(2)

Includes a MC developments with 60 units.

(3)

Includes a MC development with 66 units.

(4)

Includes five parcels of land held‑for‑use.

Location
 No. of
SNFs
 No. of
ALFs
 No. of
ROCs
 No. of
UDPs
 No. of
Others
 No. of
Beds/Units
 Encumbrances Remaining
Lease
Term(1)
 Gross
Investment
 

Alabama

  2    2      459 $  31 $18,622 

Arizona

  5  2        983    61  41,212 

California

  2  2        508    83  48,720 

Colorado

  2  9  1  (2)   705    110  67,416 

Florida

  5  9        1,061    99  74,969 

Georgia

  2  1        301    14  6,600 

Idaho

    4        148    12  9,756 

Indiana

    3        140    52  9,856 

Iowa

  6  1  1      579    83  17,422 

Kansas

  3  5        461    100  30,706 

Kentucky

        (3)         10,631 

Michigan

          (5)       1,163 

Minnesota

          1      20  3,174 

Mississippi

    1        62    96  9,400 

Nebraska

    4        158    12  9,332 

New Jersey

    4      1  205    145  70,667 

New Mexico

  7          843    78  50,303 

N. Carolina

    5        210    84  13,096 

Ohio

  2  11        772    108  98,647 

Oklahoma

    6        219    84  12,315 

Oregon

  1  3        218    19  11,927 

Pennsylvania

    3        199    75  18,040 

S. Carolina

    3  2      339    85  19,800 

Tennessee

  2          141    120  4,080 

Texas

  25  14  1  (4)   4,171    114  223,607 

Virginia

  3    1      500    113  29,052 

Washington

  1  8        431  2,035  18  27,104 
                     

TOTAL

  68  98  8    2  13,813 $2,035(6) 94 $937,617 
                     
                     

24


(1)
Weighted average remaining months in lease term as

Table of December 31, 2013.

(2)
Includes three MC developments with a total 168 units.
(3)
Includes a SNF development with 143 beds.
(4)
Includes a combination ALF and MC development with 81 units.

Contents
(5)
Includes four parcels of land held-for-use.
(6)
Consists of $2,035 of tax-exempt bonds secured by five assisted living properties in Washington with 188 units. As of December 31, 2013 our gross investment in properties encumbered by these bonds was $11,280.

The following table sets forth certain information regarding our lease expirations for our owned properties as of December 31, 20132014 (dollars amounts in thousands):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    

 

    

 

    

 

    

 

    

 

    

 

    

Annualized

    

% of Annualized

 

 

No. of

 

No. of

 

No. of

 

No. of

 

No. of

 

No. of

 

Rental

 

Rental Income

 

Year
 No. of
SNFs
 No. of
ALFs
 No. of
ROCs
 No. of
Others
 No. of
Beds/Units
 No. of
Operators
 Annualized
Rental
Income(1)
 % of Annualized
Rental Income
Expiring
 

 

SNFs

 

ALFs

 

ROCs

 

Others

 

Beds/Units

 

Operators

 

Income(1)

 

Expiring

 

2014

 2 37 2  1,861 2 13,924 14.1%

2015

  2  1 144 2 1,184 1.2%

 

— 

 

 —

 

 —

 

 —

 

 —

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 —

%

2016

 4    434 3 2,644 2.7%

 

 

 

 —

 

 —

 

675 

 

 

 

3,097 

 

3.0 

%

2017

 1   1 60 2 1,638 1.7%

 

 

 —

 

 —

 

 

60 

 

 

 

1,653 

 

1.6 

%

2018

 4 9 1  1,296 5 10,872 11.0%

 

 

 

 

 —

 

1,296 

 

 

 

10,665 

 

10.4 

%

2019

 3    613 1 1,621 1.6%

 

 

 —

 

 —

 

 —

 

613 

 

 

 

1,596 

 

1.5 

%

2020

 1 35   1,580 2 11,818 11.9%

 

 

35 

 

 —

 

 —

 

1,639 

 

 

 

13,631 

 

13.2 

%

2021

 31 7 4  4,425 5 22,211 22.4%

 

30 

 

 

 

 —

 

4,232 

 

 

 

18,365 

 

17.8 

%

2022

 1    121 1 572 0.6%

 

 

 —

 

 —

 

 —

 

121 

 

 

 

626 

 

0.6 

%

2023

 8 3 1  1,300 5 10,547 10.6%

 

 

 

 

 —

 

1,163 

 

 

 

9,345 

 

9.1 

%

2024

 

 

12 

 

 

 —

 

1,034 

 

 

 

7,996 

 

7.8 

%

Thereafter

 13 5   1,979 4 21,960 22.2%

 

14 

 

18 

 

 —

 

 —

 

2,622 

 

 

 

36,028 

 

35.0 

%

                 

TOTAL

 68 98 8 2 13,813 32(2)$98,991 100.0%

 

68 

 

83 

(2)

 

 

13,455 

 

30 

(3)

$

103,002 

 

100.0 

%

                 
                 

(1)

Annualized rental income is the total rent, excluding amortization of lease inducement, over the life of the lease recognized evenly over that lease term as of December 31, 2014 and was adjusted for the re-leasing of 20 assisted living properties formerly co-leased by affiliates of Extendicare, Inc. and Enlivant which is effective January 1, 2015. See Item 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—NOTE 3. Major Operators for further discussion of the transactions relating to the properties formerly co-leased to affiliates of Extendicare, Inc. and Enlivant. 

(1)
Annualized rental income is the total rent over the life of the lease recognized evenly over that life for leases in place as of December 31, 2013, excluding amortization of lease inducement costs.
(2)
Does not include one operator of a property under development as the term of the lease will be set upon completion of the project.

(2)

Excludes a closed assisted living property. See Item 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—NOTE 3. Major Operators for further discussion of the transactions relating to this property formerly co-leased to affiliates of Extendicare, Inc. and Enlivant. 

(3)

We have a total of 30 operators. Two of our operators are parties to multiple leases with dissimilar expirations; therefore, the sum of the number of operators by maturity does not equal our total number of operators.

Mortgage Loans.  The following table sets forth certain information regarding our mortgage loans as of December 31, 20132014 (dollars amounts in thousands):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

Average

   

Original

   

 

 

   

Current

 

 

No. of

 

No. of

 

No. of

 

No. of

 

Interest

 

Months to

 

Face Amount

 

Gross

 

Annual Debt

 

Location
 No. of
SNFs
 No. of
ALFs
 No. of
ROCs
 No. of
Beds/ Units
 Interest
Rate
 Average
Months to
Maturity
 Original
Face Amount
of Mortgage Loans
 Gross
Investment
 Current
Annual Debt
Service(1)
 

 

SNFs

 

ALFs

 

ROCs

 

Beds/ Units

 

Rate

 

Maturity

 

of Mortgage Loans

 

Investment

 

Service(1)

 

Arizona

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

100 

 

7.00%

  

55 

 

$

3,027 

 

$

3,016 

 

$

242 

 

California

   1 173 11.50% 15 $4,700 $2,602 $580 

 

 —

 

 —

 

 

173 

 

11.63%

  

 

 

4,700 

 

 

2,311 

 

 

583 

 

Florida

 3 1  310 11.13%-11.90% 11 7,850 7,111 983 

Michigan

 15   2,092 9.53% 358 124,387 124,387 11,854 

 

15 

 

 —

 

 

2,058 

 

9.53%

 

346 

 

 

124,387 

 

 

127,725 

 

 

12,079 

 

Missouri

 2   190 10.76%-11.23% 49 3,000 3,343 653 

 

 

 —

 

 

190 

 

10.88%-11.35%

 

37 

 

 

3,000 

 

 

3,051 

 

 

657 

 

Pennsylvania

  1  70 7.00% 12 5,100 5,100 362 

 

 —

 

 

 

70 

 

7.11%

 

24 

 

 

5,100 

 

 

5,100 

 

 

367 

 

Texas

 9 6  1,208 10.25%-13.57% 48 23,815 15,144 2,851 

 

 

 

 

1,208 

 

10.40%-13.70%

 

36 

 

 

22,715 

 

 

13,892 

 

 

2,869 

 

Utah

 1   84 10.60% 71 1,400 1,271 169 

 

 

 —

 

 

84 

 

10.75%

 

59 

 

 

1,400 

 

 

1,237 

 

 

171 

 

Washington

 1   104 13.63% 34 1,700 567 237 

 

 

 —

 

 

104 

 

13.75%

 

22 

 

 

1,700 

 

 

397 

 

 

237 

 

Wisconsin

 1   106 10.10% 107 2,619 7,590 755 

 

 

 —

 

 

106 

 

10.08%

 

95 

 

 

10,600 

 

 

10,600 

 

 

1,083 

 

                   

TOTAL

 32 8 1 4,337   279 $174,571 $167,115 $18,444 

 

29 

 

 

 

4,093 

 

 

 

276 

 

$

176,629 

 

$

167,329 

 

$

18,288 

 

                   
                   

(1)

Includes principal and interest payments.

(1)
Includes principal and interest payments.

Item 3.  LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
PROCEEDING
S

We are and may become from time to time a party to various general and professional liability claims and lawsuits asserted againstarising in the lessees or borrowersordinary course of our properties,business, which in our opinion are not singularly or in the aggregate anticipated to be material to our results of operations or financial condition. These types of claimsClaims and lawsuits may include matters involving general or professional liability

25


Table of Contents

asserted against the lessees or borrowers of our properties, which we believe under applicable legal principles are not our responsibility as a non-possessorynon‑possessory landlord or mortgage holder. We believe that these matters are the responsibility of our lessees and borrowers pursuant to general legal principles and pursuant to insurance and indemnification provisions in the applicable leases or mortgages. We intend to continue to vigorously defend such claims.claims and lawsuits.

Item 4.  MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES
DISCLOSURE
S

Not applicable


PART II


PART II

Item 5.  MARKETMARKET FOR THE REGISTRANT'SREGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES

Market Information

Our common stock is listed on the NYSE under the symbol "LTC"“LTC”. Set forth below are the high and low reported sale prices for our common stock as reported on the NYSE for each of the periods indicated.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


 2013 2012 

 

2014

 

2013

 


 High Low High Low 

 

High

 

Low

 

High

 

Low

 

First quarter

 $40.80 $35.58 $32.82 $30.13 

    

$

39.31 

    

$

34.77 

    

$

40.80 

    

$

35.58 

 

Second quarter

 $48.69 $36.12 $36.42 $30.96 

 

$

41.07 

 

$

36.46 

 

$

48.69 

 

$

36.12 

 

Third quarter

 $41.84 $34.30 $37.93 $31.65 

 

$

41.25 

 

$

36.77 

 

$

41.84 

 

$

34.30 

 

Fourth quarter

 $40.68 $34.88 $35.32 $30.48 

 

$

44.49 

 

$

36.75 

 

$

40.68 

 

$

34.88 

 

Holders of Record

As of December 31, 20132014 we had approximately 281262 stockholders of record of our common stock.

Dividend Information

We declared and paid total cash distributions on common stock as set forth below:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


 Declared Paid 

 

Declared

 

Paid

 


 2013 2012 2013 2012 

 

2014

 

2013

 

2014

 

2013

 

First quarter

 $0.465 $0.435 $0.465 $0.435 

    

$

0.510 

    

$

0.465 

    

$

0.510 

    

$

0.465 

 

Second quarter

 $0.465 $0.435 $0.465 $0.435 

 

$

0.510 

 

$

0.465 

 

$

0.510 

 

$

0.465 

 

Third quarter

 $0.465 $0.455 $0.465 $0.455 

 

$

0.510 

 

$

0.465 

 

$

0.510 

 

$

0.465 

 

Fourth quarter

 $0.510 $0.465 $0.510 $0.465 

 

$

0.510 

 

$

0.510 

 

$

0.510 

 

$

0.510 

 

         

 

$

2.040 

 

$

1.905 

 

$

2.040 

 

$

1.905 

 

 $1.905 $1.790 $1.905 $1.790 
         
         

 

We intend to distribute to our stockholders an amount at least sufficient to satisfy the distribution requirements of a REIT. Cash flows from operating activities available for distribution to stockholders will be derived primarily from interest and rental payments from our real estate investments. All distributions will be made subject to approval of our Board of Directors and will depend on our earnings, our financial condition and such other factors as our Board of Directors deem relevant. In order to qualify for the beneficial tax treatment accorded to REITs by Sections 856 through 860 of the Internal Revenue Code, we are required to make distributions to holders of our shares equal to at least 90% of our REIT taxable income. (See "Annual“Annual Distribution Requirements"Requirements”.)


26


Table of Contents

Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

The number of shares of our Common Stock purchased and the average prices paid per share for each month in the quarter ended December 31, 20132014 are as follows:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    

 

    

 

 

    

Total Number

    

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

of Shares

 

Maximum

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Purchased as

 

Number of

 

 

 

 

 

Average

 

Part of

 

Shares that May

 

 

 

Total Number

 

Price

 

Publicly

 

Yet Be

 

 

 

of Shares

 

Paid per

 

Announced

 

Purchased

 

Period

 

Purchased(1)

 

Share

 

Plan(2)

 

Under the Plan

 

October 1 - October 31, 2014

 

 —

 

$

 —

 

 —

 

 —

 

November 1 - November 30, 2014

 

 —

 

$

 —

 

 —

 

 —

 

December 1 - December 31, 2014

 

5,124 

 

$

41.28 

 

 —

 

 —

 

Total

 

5,124 

 

 

 

 

 —

 

 

 


(1)

During the three months ended December 31, 2014, we acquired shares of common stock held by employees who tendered owned shares to satisfy tax withholding obligations.

(2)

No shares were purchased as part of publicly announced plans or programs.

Period
 Total Number
of Shares
Purchased(1)
 Average
Price
Paid per
Share
 Total Number
of Shares
Purchased as
Part of
Publicly
Announced
Plan(2)
 Maximum
Number of
Shares that May
Yet Be
Purchased
Under the Plan
 

October 1 - October 31, 2013

   $     

November 1 - November 30, 2013

   $     

December 1 - December 31, 2013

  6,325 $36.13     
            

Total

  6,325         
            

27


(1)
During the three months ended December 31, 2013, we acquired shares

Table of common stock held by employees who tendered owned shares to satisfy tax withholding obligations.

(2)
No shares were purchased as part of publicly announced plans or programs.
Contents


Stock Performance Graph

The National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts (or NAREIT), an organization representing U.S. REITs and publicly traded real estate companies, classifies a company with 75% or more of assets directly or indirectly in the equity ownership of real estate as an equity REIT. In 2013, our equity ownership of real estate assets was more than 75%.

This graph compares the cumulative total stockholder return on our common stock from December 31, 20082009 to December 31, 20132014 with the cumulative stockholder total return of (1) the Standard & Poor'sPoor’s 500 Stock Index and (2) the NAREIT Equity REIT Index. The comparison assumes $100 was invested on December 31, 20082009 in our common stock and in each of the foregoing indices and assumes the reinvestment of dividends.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


 Period Ending 

 

Period Ending

 

Index
 12/31/08 12/31/09 12/31/10 12/31/11 12/31/12 12/31/13 

 

12/31/09

 

12/31/10

 

12/31/11

 

12/31/12

 

12/31/13

 

12/31/14

 

LTC Properties, Inc.

 100.00 141.90 158.14 184.67 222.38 234.75 

    

100.00 

    

111.45 

    

130.15 

    

156.72 

    

165.44 

    

212.64 

 

NAREIT Equity

 100.00 127.99 163.78 177.36 209.39 214.56 

 

100.00 

 

127.96 

 

138.57 

 

163.60 

 

167.63 

 

218.16 

 

S&P 500

 100.00 126.46 145.51 148.59 172.37 228.19 

 

100.00 

 

115.06 

 

117.49 

 

136.30 

 

180.44 

 

205.14 

 

 

The stock performance depicted in the above graph is not necessarily indicative of future performance.

The stock performance graph shall not be deemed incorporated by reference into any filing by us under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 except to the extent that we specifically incorporate such information by reference, and shall not otherwise be deemed filed under such Acts.


28


Table of Contents

Item 6.  SELECTEDSELECTED FINANCIAL DATA

The following table of selected financial information should be read in conjunction with our financial statements and related notes thereto included elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.10‑K.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2014

 

2013

 

2012

 

2011

 

2010

 

 

 

(In thousands, except per share amounts)

 

Operating information:

    

 

    

    

 

    

    

 

    

    

 

    

    

 

    

 

Total revenues

 

$

118,961 

 

$

104,974 

 

$

92,482 

 

$

83,618 

 

$

72,740 

 

Income from continuing operations

 

 

73,399 

 

 

55,405 

 

 

50,306 

 

 

48,620 

 

 

44,851 

 

Income allocated to non-controlling interests(1)

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

37 

 

 

191 

 

 

191 

 

Income allocated to participating securities

 

 

481 

 

 

383 

 

 

377 

 

 

342 

 

 

230 

 

Income allocated to preferred stockholders(2)

 

 

3,273 

 

 

3,273 

 

 

3,273 

 

 

9,078 

 

 

16,045 

 

Net income available to common stockholders

 

 

69,645 

 

 

54,159 

 

 

47,640 

 

 

39,832 

 

 

29,587 

 

Per share information:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net income per common share from continuing operations available to common stockholders:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Basic

 

$

2.01 

 

$

1.56 

 

$

1.54 

 

$

1.34 

 

$

1.16 

 

Diluted

 

$

1.99 

 

$

1.56 

 

$

1.54 

 

$

1.33 

 

$

1.16 

 

Net income per common share available to common stockholders:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Basic

 

$

2.01 

 

$

1.64 

 

$

1.58 

 

$

1.36 

 

$

1.21 

 

Diluted

 

$

1.99 

 

$

1.63 

 

$

1.57 

 

$

1.36 

 

$

1.21 

 

Common stock distributions declared

 

$

2.04 

 

$

1.91 

 

$

1.79 

 

$

1.68 

 

$

1.58 

 

Common stock distributions paid

 

$

2.04 

 

$

1.91 

 

$

1.79 

 

$

1.68 

 

$

1.58 

 

Balance sheet information:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total assets

 

$

965,819 

 

$

931,410 

 

$

789,592 

 

$

647,097 

 

$

561,264 

 

Total debt(3)

 

 

281,633 

 

 

278,835 

 

 

303,935 

(4)

 

159,200 

(4)

 

91,430 

 


(1)

During 2012, our limited partners exercised their rights to convert all of their 112,588 partnership units. As a result, we subsequently terminated the limited partnership.  

(2)

Income allocated to preferred stockholders includes the following (dollar amounts in thousands):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    

2014

    

2013

    

2012

    

2011

    

2010

 

Preferred stock dividends

 

$

3,273 

 

$

3,273 

 

$

3,273 

 

$

5,512 

 

$

13,662 

 

Preferred stock redemption charge

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

3,566 

 

 

2,383 

 

Total income allocated to preferred stockholders

 

$

3,273 

 

$

3,273 

 

$

3,273 

 

$

9,078 

 

$

16,045 

 

(3)

Includes bank borrowings, senior unsecured notes, mortgage loans payable and bonds payable.

(4)

Increase primarily due to the sale of senior unsecured term notes.

29


 
 2013 2012 2011 2010 2009 
 
 (In thousands, except per share amounts)
 

Operating information:

                

Total revenues

 $104,974 $92,482 $83,618 $72,740 $67,808 

Income from continuing operations

  55,405  50,306  48,620  44,851  43,538 

Income allocated to non-controlling interests(1)

    37  191  191  296 

Income allocated to participating securities

  383  377  342  230  139 

Income allocated to preferred stockholders(2)

  3,273  3,273  9,078  16,045  14,515 

Net income available to common stockholders

  54,159  47,640  39,832  29,587  29,410 

Per share information:

  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
 

Net income per common share from continuing operations available to common stockholders:

                

Basic

 $1.56 $1.54 $1.34 $1.16 $1.24 
            
            

Diluted

 $1.56 $1.54 $1.33 $1.16 $1.24 
            
            

Net income per common share available to common stockholders:

                

Basic

 $1.64 $1.58 $1.36 $1.21 $1.27 
            
            

Diluted

 $1.63 $1.57 $1.36 $1.21 $1.27 
            
            

Common stock distributions declared

 $1.91 $1.79 $1.68 $1.58 $1.56 
            
            

Common stock distributions paid

 $1.91 $1.79 $1.68 $1.58 $1.56 
            
            

Balance sheet information:

                

Total assets

 $931,410 $789,592 $647,097 $561,264 $490,593 

Total debt(3)

  278,835(4) 303,935(5) 159,200(5) 91,430(5) 25,410 

(1)
Decrease due to the conversion

Table of 112,588 partnership units and 67,294 partnership units in 2012 and 2009, respectively. During 2011 and 2010, there were no partnership conversions. During 2013, we had no limited partners.

(2)
Income allocated to preferred stockholders includes the following(dollar amounts in thousands):
Contents

  
 2013 2012 2011 2010 2009 
 

Preferred stock dividends

 $3,273 $3,273 $5,512 $13,662 $15,141 
 

Preferred stock redemption charge

      3,566  2,383   
 

Allocation of income from preferred stock buyback

          (626)
             
 
 

Total income allocated to preferred stockholders

 $3,273 $3,273 $9,078 $16,045 $14,515 
             
 
 
             
(3)
Includes bank borrowings, senior unsecured notes, mortgage loans payable and bonds payable.
(4)
Decrease due to the sale of 4,025,000 shares of common stock resulting in net proceeds of $171,365 that were used to pay down debt, fund acquisitions, development and general corporate purposes.
(5)
Increase due to the sale of senior unsecured term notes and additional bank borrowing to fund real estate acquisitions.

Item 7.  MANAGEMENT'SMANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Executive Overview

Business

Business

We are a self-administeredself‑administered health care real estate investment trust (or REIT) that invests primarily in senior housing and long term care properties through acquisitions, development, mortgage loans and other investments. We conduct and manage our business as one operating segment, rather than multiple operating segments, for internal reporting and internal decision making purposes. In 2013,2014, senior housing and long term care properties, which include skilled nursing properties (or SNF), assisted living properties (or ALF), independent living properties (or ILF), memory care properties (or MC) and combinations thereof comprised approximately 98.8%99.0% of our investment portfolio. The following table summarizes our real estate investment portfolio as of December 31, 20132014 (dollar amounts in thousands):

 
  
  
 Twelve Months
Ended
December 31, 2013
  
  
 Number of 
Type of Property
 Gross
Investments
 Percentage of
Investments
 Rental
Income
 Interest
Income(1)
 Percentage
of
Revenues(2)
 Number
of
Properties(3)
 SNF
Beds(4)
 ALF
Units(4)
 

Skilled Nursing(5)

 $611,160  55.3%$50,046 $4,881  52.6% 100  12,217   

Assisted Living

  412,024  37.3% 41,641  1,103  40.9% 106    4,852 

Range of Care

  46,509  4.2% 4,904  314  5.0% 9  733  348 

Under Development(6)

  21,432  2.0%     0.0%      

Other(7)

  13,607  1.2% 1,575    1.5% 2     
                  

Totals

 $1,104,732  100.0%$98,166 $6,298  100.0% 217  12,950  5,200 
                  
                  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Twelve Months Ended

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

December 31, 2014

 

Percentage

 

Number

 

Number of

 

 

 

Gross

 

Percentage of

 

Rental

 

Interest

 

of

 

of

 

SNF

 

ALF

 

Type of Property

 

Investments

 

Investments

 

Income(1)

 

Income(2)

 

Revenues

 

Properties(3)

 

Beds(4)

 

Units(4)

 

Skilled Nursing

    

$

633,052 

    

56.7 

%  

$

52,259 

    

$

14,595 

    

59.4 

%  

97 

    

12,057 

    

— 

 

Assisted Living

 

 

415,520 

 

37.2 

%  

 

37,847 

 

 

985 

 

34.5 

%  

92 

 

— 

 

4,446 

 

Range of Care

 

 

46,217 

 

4.1 

%  

 

5,332 

 

 

282 

 

5.0 

%  

 

733 

 

348 

 

Under Development(5)

 

 

11,495 

 

1.0 

%  

 

— 

 

 

— 

 

— 

%  

— 

 

— 

 

— 

 

Other(6)

 

 

10,883 

 

1.0 

%  

 

1,294 

 

 

— 

 

1.1 

%  

 

— 

 

— 

 

Totals

 

$

1,117,167 

 

100.0 

%  

$

96,732 

 

$

15,862 

 

100.0 

%  

198 

 

12,790 

 

4,794 

 


(1)

Excludes rental income from properties sold during 2014.

(1)
Includes interest income from mortgage loans.
(2)
Includes rental income and interest income from mortgage loans.
(3)
We have investments in 30 states leased or mortgaged to 40 different operators.
(4)
SeeItem 2. Properties for discussion of bed/unit count.
(5)
Includes a mortgage and construction loan secured by a currently operating skilled nursing property and parcel of land upon which a 106-bed replacement property is being constructed.
(6)
Includes three MC developments with a total of 168 units, a combination ALF and MC development with 81 units, and a SNF development with 143 beds.
(7)
Includes two school properties and four parcels of land held-for-use.

(2)

Excludes interest income from mortgage loans paid off during 2014.

(3)

We have investments in 29 states leased or mortgaged to 37 different operators.

(4)

See Item 2. Properties for discussion of bed/unit count.

(5)

Includes two MC developments with a total of 126 units.

(6)

Includes one school and five parcels of land held‑ for‑use.

As of December 31, 20132014 we had $884.4$892.2 million in carrying value of net real estate investment, consisting of $718.9$726.5 million or 81.3%81.4% invested in owned and leased properties and $165.4$165.7 million or 18.7%18.6% invested in mortgage loans secured by first mortgages.

For the year ended December 31, 2013,2014, rental income and interest income from mortgage loans represented 93.5%85.6% and 6.0%13.9%, respectively, of total gross revenues. In most instances, our lease structure contains fixed or estimable annual rental escalations, which are generally recognized on a straight-linestraight‑line basis over the minimum lease period. Certain leases have annual rental escalations that are contingent upon changes in the Consumer Price Index and/or changes in the gross operating revenues of the property. This revenue is not recognized until the appropriate contingencies have been resolved. For the years ended December 31, 2013, 20122014, we recognized $3.0 million in straight‑line rental income and 2011 we recorded $4.0 million, $3.3 million and $3.7 million, respectively, in straight-line rental income. Also during 2013, 2012 and 2011 we recorded $37,000, $38,000 and $46,000, respectively,$30,000 of straight-linestraight‑line rent receivable reserve. During the fourth quarterOur lease with affiliates of 2013, we wrote-off a $0.9 million straight-line rent receivable balance related to the transition of fourExtendicare, Inc. (or Extendicare) and Enlivant covering 37 assisted living properties expired on December 31, 2014. Effective January 1, 2015, we re-leased 20 of the 37 properties by adding 13 properties to an existing master lease and entering into a new lessee.master lease for seven of the properties. See Investing Activities below for further discussion of the transactions relating to the properties formerly co-leased to affiliates of Extendicare and Enlivant. For the remaining leases in place at December 31, 2013,2014, including the new leases effective January 1, 2015 for the 20 properties formerly co-leased by Extendicare and Enlivant, and assuming no modification or replacement of existing leases and no new leased investments are added to our portfolio, we currently expect that straight-linestraight‑line rental income will decreaseincrease from $3.9$3.0 million in 20132014 to $2.2$6.9 million for projected annual 20142015 primarily due to the new leases effective January 1, 2015 for the 20 properties, as previously discussed, and conversely,completed development projects. Conversely, our cash


rental income is projected to increasedecrease from $96.0$99.7 million in 20132014 to $97.5$98.1 million for projected annual 2014.2015 primarily due to the sale of 16 properties to Enlivant partially offset by completed development projects. During the year ended December 31, 2013,2014, we received $96.0

30


Table of Contents

$99.7 million of cash rental revenue and recorded $0.7$0.8 million of lease inducement costs.inducement. At December 31, 2013 and 2012,2014, the straight-linestraight‑line rent receivable balance, net of reserves, on the consolidated balance sheet was $29.8 million and $26.8 million, respectively. $32.7 million.

Many of our existing leases contain renewal options that, if exercised, could result in the future, renew aboveamount of rent payable upon renewal being greater or below current rent rates.less than that currently being paid. For the year ended December 31, 2013,2014, we renewed fivematerially amended two existing master leases at rates similarand entered into one new master lease. One existing master lease was amended for the sole purpose of adding a newly acquired 48-unit assisted living property and incorporating the related economics (see Key Transactions below for further information regarding the acquisition). Another existing master lease was amended and restated to facilitate its combination with an existing rates by either i) amendingindividual lease, extend the lease to extendterm by approximately 10 years, and re-set the term and assignrent resulting in a 29% increase in the leaseaggregate rent payable under the previous leases. Finally, we transitioned four non-stabilized, underperforming assisted living properties to a new operator, ii) combining individual leaseslessee and entered into a new master lease with no change tofor a term of two years at rent representing a decrease of approximately 61% from that rent payable under the term, iii) combing an individual lease into aprior master lease and extending(which decrease may be partially mitigated by percentage rent derived from increased revenues at the properties). At the expiration of the 2-year term, iv) amending a leasethe rent for these properties will be adjusted to extend the term or v) combining two master leases into one master lease with no change to the term.their then current market rates.   

Our primary objectives are to create, sustain and enhance stockholder equity value and provide current income for distribution to stockholders through real estate investments in senior housing and long term care properties managed by experienced operators. To meet these objectives, we attempt to invest in properties that provide opportunity for additional value and current returns to our stockholders and diversify our investment portfolio by geographic location, operator, property type and form of investment. We opportunistically consider investments in health care facilities in related businesses where the business model is similar to our existing model and the opportunity provides an attractive expected return. Consistent with this strategy, we pursue, from time to time, opportunities for potential acquisitions and investments, with due diligence and negotiations often at different stages of development at any particular time.

·

With respect to skilled nursing properties, we attempt to invest in properties that do not have to rely on a high percentage of private‑pay patients. We prefer to invest in a property that has significant market presence in its community and where state certificate of need and/or licensing procedures limit the entry of competing properties.

·

For assisted living and independent living investments we have attempted to diversify our portfolio both geographically and across product levels.

·

Memory care facilities offer specialized options for seniors with Alzheimer’s disease and other forms of dementia. Purpose built, free‑standing memory care facilities offer an attractive alternative for private‑pay residents affected by memory loss in comparison to other accommodations that typically have been provided within a secured unit of an assisted living or skilled nursing facility. These facilities offer dedicated care and specialized programming for various conditions relating to memory loss in a secured environment that is typically smaller in scale and more residential in nature than traditional assisted living facilities. Residents require a higher level of care and more assistance with activities of daily living than in assisted living facilities. Therefore, these facilities have staff available 24 hours a day to respond to the unique needs of their residents.

Substantially all of our revenues and sources of cash flows from operations are derived from operating lease rentals and interest earned on outstanding loans receivable. Our investments in owned properties and mortgage loans represent our primary source of liquidity to fund distributions and are dependent upon the performance of the operators on their lease and loan obligations and the rates earned thereon. To the extent that the operators experience operating difficulties and are unable to generate sufficient cash to make payments to us, there could be a material adverse impact on our consolidated results of operations, liquidity and/or financial condition. To mitigate this risk, we monitor our investments through a variety of methods determined by the type of health care facility and operator. Our monitoring process includes periodic review of financial statements for each facility, periodic review of operator credit, scheduled property inspections and review of covenant compliance.


In addition to our monitoring and research efforts, we also structure our investments to help mitigate payment risk. Some operating leases and loans are credit enhanced by guaranties and/or letters of credit. In addition, operating

31


Table of Contents

leases are typically structured as master leases and loans are generally cross-defaultedcross‑defaulted and cross-collateralizedcross‑collateralized with other loans, operating leases or agreements between us and the operator and its affiliates.

Depending upon the availability and cost of external capital, we anticipate making additional investments in health care related properties. New investments are generally funded from cash on hand, temporary borrowings under our unsecured revolving line of credit and internally generated cash flows. Our investments generate internal cash from rent and interest receipts and principal payments on mortgage loans receivable. Permanent financing for future investments, which replaces funds drawn under our unsecured revolving line of credit, is expected to be provided through a combination of public and private offerings of debt and equity securities and secured and unsecured debt financing. The timing, source and amount of cash flows provided by financing activities and used in investing activities are sensitive to the capital markets environment, especially to changes in interest rates. Changes in the capital markets'markets’ environment may impact the availability of cost-effectivecost‑effective capital.

We believe our business model has enabled and will continue to enable us to maintain the integrity of our property investments, including in response to financial difficulties that may be experienced by operators. Traditionally, we have taken a conservative approach to managing our business, choosing to maintain liquidity and exercise patience until favorable investment opportunities arise.

At December 31, 2013,2014, we had $6.8$25.2 million of cash on hand $219.0and $400.0 million available under our $240.0 million unsecured revolving line of credit, and $30.0 million available under the uncommitted private shelf agreement. Subsequent to December 31, 2013, we borrowed $11.5 million and, therefore, have $207.5 million available under or unsecured revolving line of credit. We alsoSubsequent to December 31, 2014, we borrowed $18.0 million under our unsecured revolving line of credit. Accordingly, we have the potential ability$18.0 million outstanding with $382.0 million available for borrowing. Also, we have $775.1 million available under our effective shelf registration to access the capital markets through the issuance of debt and/or equity securities under our $800.0 million effective shelf registration.securities. As a result, we believe our liquidity and various sources of available capital are sufficient to fund operations and development commitments, meet debt service obligations (both principal and interest), make dividend distributions and finance some future investments should we determine such future investments are financially feasible.

Key Transactions

Extendicare, Inc. and Enlivant. Our master lease with affiliates of Extendicare, Inc. (or Extendicare) and Enlivant (formerly known as Assisted Living Concepts, Inc.) covering 37 assisted living properties with a total of 1,429 units expired on December 31, 2014. For the year ended December 31, 2014, this portfolio generated approximately $11.0 million or 9.3% of our combined rental revenue and interest income from mortgage loans. During the fourth quarter of 2014, we entered into three agreements relating to the 37 assisted living properties as follows:

·

We sold 16 properties, consisting of 615 units located in Washington, Oregon, Idaho and Arizona to an affiliate of Enlivant for a sales price of $26.5 million. Accordingly, we recognized a gain on sale of $3.8 million. We also gave Enlivant consent to close a property located in Oregon. We are currently exploring sale and lease options for this property which has a net book value of $0.9 million.

·

We added 13 properties with 500 units in Indiana, Iowa, Ohio, Nebraska and New Jersey to an existing master lease with an affiliate of Senior Lifestyle Management (or Senior Lifestyle). Beginning January 1, 2015, the initial term of the amended and restated master lease will be 15 years and rent will increase by $5.1 million over the current annual rent, increasing by 2.6% annually thereafter.

·

We re-leased seven properties with 278 units in Texas to Veritas InCare (or Veritas) under a new 10-year master lease. Beginning January 1, 2015, the initial rent will be $1.5 million increasing 2.5% annually.

Extendicare and Enlivant paid rent in accordance with the terms of the current master leases through December 31, 2014. The initial cash yield on the 20 properties re-leased to Senior Lifestyle and Veritas is comparable to the cash yield in 2014 under the expiring master leases with Extendicare and Enlivant. Additionally, the new and amended master leases will provide us with the potential for additional rent attributable to participation in revenue growth at the properties over a predetermined base amount.

32


Table of Contents

Owned Properties.  During 2013,2014, we purchasedacquired a 120-bed skilled nursing48-unit assisted living property located in FloridaColorado for $14.4 million.$9.8 million and recorded $0.1 million in transaction costs. The property was included in aadded to an existing master lease at an incremental initial cash yield of 8.75%.6.5% and we provided the lessee with contingent earn-out payments as a lease inducement. The operator previously leased four properties withcontingent earn-out payments require us to pay two earn-out payments totaling up to $4.0 million upon the property achieving a totalsustainable stipulated rent coverage ratio. We estimated the fair value of 596 beds/units from us. The new masterthe contingent earn-out payments using a discounted cash flow analysis and recorded the estimated fair value of $3.2 million as a lease contains all five properties withinducement which is amortized as a totalyield adjustment over the life of 716 beds/units and has a GAAP yield of 10.7%. The initialthe lease term is 10 years with two 5-year renewal options and annual rent escalations of 2.2%. During 2013, we completed the construction and opened of a 60-unit memory care property in Colorado, a 120-bed skilled nursing property in Texas and a 77-unit combination assisted living and memory care property in Kansas. The new 120-bed skilled nursing property replacescontingent earn-out liability which is accreted to the settlement amount as of the estimated payment date. See Investing Activities below for further discussion on the accounting treatment of the contingent earn-out liability.

During 2014, we purchased a skilled nursing property in our existing portfolio.

        During 2013, we entered into development commitments totaling $19.6 million with an existing operator to fund the purchasevacant parcel of land and construction of two free-standing memory care properties within Illinois for $1.4 million under a total of 108 units in Colorado. In conjunction with such commitments, we closed on two parcels of land for an aggregate purchase price of $2.1 million which were simultaneously added to the existing master lease agreement with the operator. Rent at an initial annual rate of 9.25% will commence upon the respective project's completion date (but in no event later than December 31, 2014) and be calculated based on the land purchase price and construction costs funded for each property plus 9.0% compounded on the land purchase price and each amount funded under the commitments. Also, during 2013, we entered into adevelopment pipeline agreement with this same operator whereby we have the opportunity


to finance any senior housing development projectsproject or acquisitionsacquisition originated by the operator through May 2018 (unless earlier terminated as provided for therein) with provisions limiting, among other things, to five the number of development projects the operator may have under construction at any time. Any such projects or opportunities financed by us pursuant to the agreement will bean operator. The land was added to the parties'an existing master lease withand we entered into development commitments in an amount not to exceed $12.2 million, including the then remaining term extended by 10 years at initial lease rates estimatedland purchase, to range from 9.0% to 10.5% with annual escalationsfund the construction of 2.5%.a 66-unit memory care property. 

        Mortgage Loans.    During 2013,Also, in 2014, we funded a $124.4 million mortgage loan with a third-party operator, Prestige Healthcare, secured by 15completed the development of three assisted living properties with a total of 2,092188 units and a 143-bed skilled nursing bedsproperty for a total cost of $45.0 million. Additionally, we completed the expansion and renovation of three existing assisted living properties with a total of 195 units for an aggregate cost of $11.5 million.

During 2014, we sold two assisted living properties located in Michigan.Florida and Georgia with a total of 133 units, a school located in Minnesota, and a closed skilled nursing property for a combined sales price of $8.1 million, resulting in net sales proceeds of $7.9 million and net gain on sale of $1.1 million.

Mortgage Loans.  During 2014, we originated a $3.0 million mortgage loan secured by a 100-unit independent living property in Arizona. The loan is for a term of 30five years and bears interest at 9.53% for five years,7.0%, escalating annually thereafter0.25% annually. Additionally, we funded $3.0 million which represents the final funding on a $10.6 million mortgage and construction loan secured by 2.25%. Payments are interest-only for three years, after whichan existing skilled nursing property and a newly constructed 106-bed replacement skilled nursing property. Upon completion of construction, the residents were relocated from the old skilled nursing property to the new replacement skilled nursing property and the old skilled nursing property was closed. The old skilled nursing property was sold by the borrower and released as collateral. Subsequent to December 31, 2014, we purchased and equipped the replacement property for a total of $13.9 million by exercising our right under the agreement. The property was added to an existing master lease at a lease rate equivalent to the interest rate in effect on the loan at the time of purchase. Additionally, we paid the lessee a $1.1 million lease inducement which will make interest payments alongbe amortized as a yield adjustment over the life of the lease term. 

Bank Borrowings.  During 2014, we amended our unsecured revolving line of credit increasing the commitment to $400.0 million with annual principal paymentsthe opportunity to increase the credit amount up to a total of $1.0$600.0 million. The loan agreementamended unsecured revolving line of credit decreased our drawn pricing by 25 basis points and the maturity was extended to October 14, 2018. Additionally, the amendment provides for additional forward commitments of $12.0 million for capital improvements at 9.41% for the first twelve months. The loan agreement also provides, under certain conditions and based on certain operating metrics and valuation thresholds achieved and sustained within the first twelve years of the term, for additional loan proceeds of up to $40.0 million with such proceeds limited to $10.0 million per twelve months.a one-year extension.

        The borrower has a one-time option between the third and twelfth years to prepay up to 50% of the then outstanding loan balance without penalty. Exclusively for the purposes of this option, the properties collateralizing the loan have been separated by us into two pools of assets. If and when the option is exercised, we will identify which of the two pools we will release for prepayment and removal from portfolio of properties securing the loan. If the prepayment option is exercised and timely concluded, the borrower forfeits its opportunity to access any additional loan proceeds. Additionally, under certain circumstances, including a change in regulatory environment, we have the option to purchase the properties.

Senior Unsecured Notes.During 2013,2014, we sold $70.0$30.0 million aggregate principal amount of 3.99%4.5% senior unsecured notes due November 20, 2021July 31, 2026 to affiliates and managed accounts of Prudential Investment Management, Inc. (individually and collectively, "Prudential"). The notes bear interest at an annual fixed rate of 3.99% and mature in 812 years with interest-onlyinterest‑only payments in the first twoeight years and annual principal amortization thereafter. We used a portion of the proceeds to pay down our unsecured revolving line of credit.

Equity.  During 2013,2014, we sold 4,025,000600,000 shares of common stock at a price of $44.50$41.50 per share before fees and costs of $7.7 million, in a public offering.direct placement to certain institutional investors. The net proceeds of $171.4$24.6 million were used to pay down amounts outstanding under our unsecured revolving line of credit, to fund acquisitions and our current development commitments and for general corporate purposes.

Key Performance Indicators, Trends and Uncertainties

We utilize several key performance indicators to evaluate the various aspects of our business. These indicators are discussed below and relate to concentration risk and credit strength. Management uses these key performance

33


Table of Contents

indicators to facilitate internal and external comparisons to our historical operating results in making operating decisions and for budget planning purposes.

Concentration Risk.  We evaluate by gross investment our concentration risk in terms of asset mix, investment mix, operator mix and geographic mix. Concentration risk is valuable to understand what portion of our investments could be at risk if certain sectors were to experience downturns. Asset mix measures the portion of our investments that are real property or mortgage loans. In order to qualify as an equity REIT, at least 75 percent of our total assets must be represented by real estate assets, cash, cash items and government securities. Investment mix measures the portion of our investments that relate to our various property types. Operator mix measures the portion of our investments that relate to our top five operators. Geographic mix measures the portion of our investment that relate to our top five states.


The following table reflects our recent historical trends of concentration risk(gross investment, in thousands):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


 Period Ended 

 

Period Ended

 


 12/31/13 9/30/13 6/30/13 3/31/13 12/31/12 

 

12/31/2014

 

9/30/2014

 

6/30/2014

 

3/31/2014

 

12/31/2013

 

Asset mix:

           

    

 

    

    

 

    

    

 

    

    

 

    

    

 

    

 

Real property

 $937,617 $911,096 $913,042 $906,582 $900,095 

 

$

949,838 

 

$

966,012 

 

$

956,516 

 

$

951,491 

 

$

937,617 

 

Loans receivable

 167,115 41,079 39,668 40,142 40,081 

 

 

167,329 

 

 

173,051 

 

 

169,766 

 

 

169,163 

 

 

167,115 

 

Investment mix:

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Skilled nursing properties(1)

 $611,160 $470,008 $478,751 $478,311 $475,873 

 

$

633,052 

 

$

632,547 

 

$

629,228 

 

$

625,831 

 

$

621,791 

 

Assisted living properties(1)

 412,024 409,285 406,785 402,913 399,391 

 

 

415,520 

 

 

442,538 

 

 

435,406 

 

 

431,567 

 

 

420,385 

 

Range of care properties

 46,509 46,577 46,643 46,707 46,769 

 

 

46,217 

 

 

46,293 

 

 

46,367 

 

 

46,439 

 

 

46,509 

 

Under development(1)

 21,432 13,861 8,087 6,349 5,817 

 

 

11,495 

 

 

6,802 

 

 

4,848 

 

 

3,210 

 

 

2,440 

 

Other(5)(2)

 13,607 12,444 12,444 12,444 12,326 

 

 

10,883 

 

 

10,883 

 

 

10,433 

 

 

13,607 

 

 

13,607 

 

Operator mix:

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Prestige Healthcare(5)

 $137,739 $ $ $ $ 

 

$

141,527 

 

$

139,702 

 

$

138,437 

 

$

137,739 

 

$

137,739 

 

Senior Care Centers, LLC(4)

 114,539 114,539 114,539 114,539 114,539 

Extendicare & ALC

 88,034 88,034 88,034 88,034 88,034 

Brookdale Communities(3)

 

 

123,984 

 

 

123,229 

 

 

123,172 

 

 

119,160 

 

 

112,290 

 

Senior Care Centers, LLC

 

 

115,039 

 

 

114,539 

 

 

114,539 

 

 

114,539 

 

 

114,539 

 

Juniper Communities, LLC

 87,088 87,088 87,088 87,088 87,088 

 

 

87,088 

 

 

87,088 

 

 

87,088 

 

 

87,088 

 

 

87,088 

 

Brookdale Communities

 84,219 84,216 84,212 84,211 84,210 

Extendicare, Inc. & Enlivant(4)

 

 

48,977 

 

 

88,034 

 

 

88,034 

 

 

88,034 

 

 

88,034 

 

Remaining operators

 593,113 578,298 578,837 572,852 566,305 

 

 

600,552 

 

 

586,471 

 

 

575,012 

 

 

574,094 

 

 

565,042 

 

Geographic mix:

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Texas

 $238,750 $238,036 $236,100 $233,865 $232,106 

 

$

239,539 

 

$

239,926 

 

$

239,809 

 

$

239,158 

 

$

238,750 

 

Michigan(5)

 125,550     

 

 

129,338 

 

 

127,513 

 

 

126,247 

 

 

125,550 

 

 

125,550 

 

Colorado

 

 

109,859 

 

 

94,598 

 

 

89,019 

 

 

78,258 

 

 

67,416 

 

Ohio

 98,647 98,647(6) 110,804 110,804 110,804 

 

 

98,647 

 

 

98,647 

 

 

98,647 

 

 

98,647 

 

 

98,647 

 

Florida

 82,079(7) 67,710 67,742 67,772 67,802 

 

 

71,011 

 

 

77,665 

 

 

77,555 

 

 

82,046 

 

 

82,079 

 

New Jersey

 70,668 70,667 70,667 70,667 70,667 

Remaining states(4)

 489,038 477,115 467,397 463,616 458,797 

 

 

468,773 

 

 

500,714 

 

 

495,005 

 

 

496,995 

 

 

492,290 

 


(1)

During 2014, we completed the construction of a 60‑unit memory care property, a 48-unit memory care property, a 143‑bed skilled nursing property and a combination assisted living and memory care property with 80 units. Accordingly, these properties were reclassified from “Under development” to either “Skilled nursing property” or “Assisted living property,” depending on the property type, for all periods presented.

(1)
During 2013, we completed the construction of a 60-unit memory care property, a 120-bed skilled nursing property and a combination assisted living and memory care property with 77 units. Accordingly, these properties were reclassified from "Under development" to either "Skilled nursing property" or "Assisted living property," depending on the property type, for all periods presented.
(2)
Includes two school properties and four parcels of land held-for-use.
(3)
During the three months ended December 31, 2013, we funded a $124,387 mortgage loan with Prestige Healthcare secured by 15 skilled nursing properties with a total of 2,092 beds in Michigan.
(4)
During 2013, we entered into an amended and restated master lease agreement with Senior Care Centers, LLC (or Senior Care) to include four skilled nursing properties which were previously operated by and subleased to Senior Care but was not included in Senior Care's operator mix. Accordingly, the four skilled nursing properties were reclassified from "Remaining operators" to "Senior Care Center, LLC" operator mix for all periods presented.
(5)
During the three months ended December 31, 2013, we purchased four parcels of land located in Michigan. These parcels of land are located adjacent to properties securing the Prestige Healthcare mortgage loan and are managed by Prestige Healthcare.
(6)
Decrease due to the sale of six skilled nursing properties with a total of 230 beds.
(7)
During the fourth quarter of December 31, 2013, we purchased a 120-bed skilled nursing property in Florida for $14,402.

(2)

Includes a  school and five parcels of land held‑ for‑use.

(3)

In July 2014, Brookdale Senior Living, Inc., parent company of Brookdale Senior Living Communities, Inc. (or Brookdale Communities) merged with Emeritus Corporation (or Emeritus). Prior to the merger, Emeritus operated two assisted living properties under a master lease. These properties were reclassified into Brookdale Communities for all periods presented.

(4)

In December 2014, we sold 16 assisted living properties with a gross investment of $39,056 to an affiliate of Enlivant. These properties were located in Arizona, Idaho, Oregon and Washington. During 2014, we re-leased 20 assisted living properties, effective January 1, 2015, and closed an assisted living property formerly co-leased to affiliates of Extendicare, Inc. and Enlivant. See Investing Activities below for further discussion of the transactions relating to the properties formerly co-leased to affiliates of Extendicare, Inc. and Enlivant.  

        In January 2014, we announced that we will not be renewing leases that will expire on December 31, 2014 with Extendicare and ALC covering 37 assisted living properties. For the twelve months ended December 31, 2013, this portfolio totaled approximately $11.0 million or 10.5% of our combined rental revenue and interest income from mortgage loans. There can be no assurance that we will be able to re-lease these communities on a timely basis, if at all, or that the new rents will be the same as the current rents.


Credit Strength.  We measure our credit strength both in terms of leverage ratios and coverage ratios. Our leverage ratios include debt to gross asset value and debt to market capitalization. The leverage ratios indicate how much

34


of our consolidated balance sheet capitalization is related to long term obligations. Our coverage ratios include interest coverage ratio and fixed charge coverage ratio. The coverage ratios indicate our ability to service interest and fixed charges (interest plus preferred dividends). The coverage ratios are based on adjusted earnings before gain on sale of real estate, interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization (or Adjusted EBITDA). Leverage ratios and coverage ratios are widely used by investors, analysts and rating agencies in the valuation, comparison, rating and investment recommendations of companies. The following table reflects the recent historical trends for our credit strength measures:

Balance Sheet Metrics

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Year Ended

 

Quarter Ended

 

 

 

12/31/14

 

12/31/14

 

 

9/30/14

 

 

6/30/14

 

 

3/31/14

 

 

12/31/13

 

Debt to gross asset value

    

23.7 

%  

23.7 

%

(1)  

25.5 

%

 

25.1 

%  

 

25.2 

%

(5)  

24.2 

%

Debt & preferred stock to gross asset value

 

26.9 

%  

26.9 

%

(1)  

28.7 

%

 

28.4 

%  

 

28.5 

%

(5)  

27.6 

%

Debt to market capitalization ratio

 

15.2 

%  

15.2 

%

(2)  

18.6 

%

(4)  

17.4 

%  

 

17.9 

%

 

18.0 

%

Debt & preferred stock to market capitalization ratio

 

17.3 

%  

17.3 

%

(2)  

21.0 

%

(4)  

19.7 

%  

 

20.2 

%

 

20.5 

%

Interest coverage ratio(6)

 

7.3 

x

6.9 

x

(3)  

7.3 

x

 

7.5 

x

 

7.6 

x

 

7.7 

x

Fixed charge coverage ratio(6)

 

6.0 

x

5.7 

x

(3)  

6.0 

x

 

6.1 

x

 

6.1 

x

 

6.1 

x

 
 Year Ended Quarter Ended 
 
 12/31/13 12/31/13 9/30/13 6/30/13 3/31/13 12/31/12 

Debt to gross asset value

  24.2% 24.2%(1) 17.8% 17.8%(6) 30.6%(9) 30.8%

Debt & preferred stock to gross asset value

  27.6% 27.6%(1) 21.5% 21.4%(6) 34.5%(9) 34.7%

Debt to market capitalization ratio

  18.0% 18.0%(2) 12.1%(4) 11.9%(7) 19.1%(10) 21.4%

Debt & preferred stock to market capitalization ratio

  20.5% 20.5%(2) 14.6%(4) 14.3%(7) 21.6%(10) 24.2%

Interest coverage ratio(12)

  8.1x 8.3x(3) 9.1x(5) 8.2x(8) 7.1x(11) 7.4x

Fixed charge coverage ratio(12)

  6.3x 6.5x(3) 6.9x(5) 6.3x(8) 5.6x(11) 5.7x

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Year Ended

 

Quarter Ended

 

 

 

12/31/14

 

12/31/14

 

9/30/14

 

6/30/14

 

3/31/14

 

12/31/13

 

Net income

    

$

73,399 

    

$

21,000 

    

$

17,122 

    

$

18,273 

    

$

17,004 

    

$

14,650 

 

Less: Gain on sale

 

 

(4,959)

 

 

(3,819)

 

 

 —

 

 

(1,140)

 

 

 

 

 —

 

Add: Interest expense

 

 

13,128 

 

 

3,683 

 

 

3,170 

 

 

3,088 

 

 

3,187 

 

 

2,852 

 

Add: Depreciation and amortization—continuing & discontinued operations

 

 

25,529 

 

 

6,594 

 

 

6,335 

 

 

6,302 

 

 

6,298 

 

 

6,237 

 

Total adjusted EBITDA

 

$

107,097 

 

$

27,458 

 

$

26,627 

 

$

26,523 

 

$

26,489 

 

$

23,739 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interest expense

 

$

13,128 

 

$

3,683 

 

$

3,170 

 

$

3,088 

 

$

3,187 

 

$

2,852 

 

Add: Capitalized interest

 

 

1,506 

 

 

290 

 

 

474 

 

 

435 

 

 

307 

 

 

214 

 

Interest incurred

 

$

14,634 

 

$

3,973 

 

$

3,644 

 

$

3,523 

 

$

3,494 

 

$

3,066 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interest coverage ratio

 

 

7.3 

x

 

6.9 

x

 

7.3 

x

 

7.5 

x

 

7.6 

x

 

7.7 

x

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interest incurred

 

$

14,634 

 

$

3,973 

 

$

3,644 

 

$

3,523 

 

$

3,494 

 

$

3,066 

 

Preferred stock dividends (excludes preferred stock redemption charge)

 

 

3,273 

 

 

819 

 

 

818 

 

 

818 

 

 

818 

 

 

819 

 

Total fixed charges

 

$

17,907 

 

$

4,792 

 

$

4,462 

 

$

4,341 

 

$

4,312 

 

$

3,885 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Fixed charge coverage ratio

 

 

6.0 

x

 

5.7 

x

 

6.0 

x

 

6.1 

x

 

6.1 

x

 

6.1 

x


(1)

Decrease primarily due to debt pay down from proceeds from the sale of 16 properties to Enlivant and proceeds from the sale of 600,000 shares of common stock in a registered direct placement partially offset by a decrease in gross asset value related to the sale of properties.

(1)
Increase primarily due to the increase in outstanding debt due to the sale of senior unsecured notes to fund investments partially offset by the increase in gross asset value from acquisitions, additional development and capital improvement funding.
(2)
Increase due to the increase in outstanding debt due to the sale of senior unsecured notes to fund investments.
(3)
Decrease primarily due to the increase in interest expense resulting from the sale of senior unsecured notes.
(4)
Increase due to decrease in market capitalization.
(5)
Increase primarily due to the increased income due to rental income from completed construction projects and the decrease in interest expense resulting from lower outstanding debt.
(6)
Decrease primarily due to the decrease in outstanding debt and the increase in gross asset value from additional development and capital improvement funding.
(7)
Decrease primarily due to the decrease in outstanding debt and the increase in market capitalization resulting from the sale of 4,025,000 shares of common stock in a public offering.
(8)
Increase primarily due to the decrease in interest expense due to the decrease in outstanding debt.
(9)
Decrease primarily due to increase in gross asset value from additional development and capital improvement funding.
(10)
Decrease primarily due to the increase in market capitalization.
(11)
Decrease primarily due to increase in interest expense resulting from increased pricing levels under our unsecured revolving line of credit.
(12)

(2)

Decrease primarily due to the decrease in outstanding debt and the increase in market capitalization resulting from the sale of 600,000 shares of common stock in a registered direct placement and increase in stock price.

(3)

Decrease primarily due to increase in interest expense resulting from the sale of senior unsecured notes and increased availability under our expanded unsecured revolving line of credit.

(4)

Increase primarily due to sale of senior unsecured notes and decrease in market capitalization due to decrease in stock price.

(5)

Increase primarily due to increased borrowings under our unsecured revolving line of credit partially offset by the increase in gross asset value from additional development and capital improvement funding.

In calculating our interest coverage and fixed charge coverage ratios above, we use Adjusted EBITDA, which is a financial measure not derived in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (non-GAAP(non‑GAAP financial measure). Adjusted EBITDA is not an alternative to net income, operating income, income from continuing operations or cash flows from operating activities as calculated and presented in accordance with U.S. GAAP. You should not rely on Adjusted EBITDA as a substitute foror any such U.S. GAAP financial measures or consider it in isolation, for the purpose of analyzing our financial performance, financial position or cash flows. Net income is the most directly comparable GAAP measure to Adjusted EBITDA.


35


 
 Year Ended Quarter Ended 
 
 12/31/13 12/31/13 9/30/13 6/30/13 3/31/13 12/31/12 

Net income

 $57,815 $14,650 $17,286 $12,903 $12,976 $12,778 

(Less) Add: (Gain) loss on sale

  (1,605)   (2,619) 1,014     

Add: Interest expense

  11,364  2,852  2,581  2,798  3,133  2,907 

Add: Depreciation and amortization—continuing & discontinued operations

  24,706  6,237  6,202  6,131  6,136  5,692 
              

Total adjusted EBITDA

 $92,280 $23,739 $23,450 $22,846 $22,245 $21,377 
              
              

Interest expense

 $11,364 $2,852 $2,581 $2,798 $3,133 $2,907 

Interest coverage ratio

  8.1x 8.3x 9.1x 8.2x 7.1x 7.4x

Interest expense

 $11,364 $2,852 $2,581 $2,798 $3,133 $2,907 

Preferred stock dividends (excludes preferred stock redemption charge)

  3,273  819  818  818  818  819 
              

Total fixed charges

 $14,637 $3,671 $3,399 $3,616 $3,951 $3,726 
              
              

Fixed charge coverage ratio

  6.3x 6.5x 6.9x 6.3x 5.6x 5.7x

Table of Contents

We evaluate our key performance indicators in conjunction with current expectations to determine if historical trends are indicative of future results. Our expected results may not be achieved and actual results may differ materially from our expectations. This may be a result of various factors, including, but not limited to

·

The status of the economy;

·

The status of capital markets, including prevailing interest rates;

·

Compliance with and changes to regulations and payment policies within the health care industry;

·

Changes in financing terms;

·

Competition within the health care and senior housing industries; and

·

Changes in federal, state and local legislation.

Management regularly monitors the economic and other factors listed above. We develop strategic and tactical plans designed to improve performance and maximize our competitive position. Our ability to achieve our financial objectives is dependent upon our ability to effectively execute these plans and to appropriately respond to emerging economic and company-specificcompany‑specific trends.


36


Table of Contents

Operating Results

Year ended December 31, 2014 compared to year ended December 31, 2013 (in thousands)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Years ended December 31,

 

 

 

 

 

 

2014

2013

 

Difference

 

Revenues:

    

 

    

    

 

    

    

 

    

 

Rental income

 

$

101,849 

 

$

98,166 

 

$

3,683 

(1)

Interest income from mortgage loans

 

 

16,553 

 

 

6,298 

 

 

10,255 

(2)

Interest and other income

 

 

559 

 

 

510 

 

 

49 

 

Total revenues

 

 

118,961 

 

 

104,974 

 

 

13,987 

 

Expenses:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interest expense

 

 

13,128 

 

 

11,364 

 

 

1,764 

(3)

Depreciation and amortization

 

 

25,529 

 

 

24,389 

 

 

1,140 

(1)

Provision for doubtful accounts

 

 

32 

 

 

2,180 

 

 

(2,148)

(4)

General and administrative expenses

 

 

11,832 

 

 

11,636 

 

 

196 

 

Total expenses

 

 

50,521 

 

 

49,569 

 

 

952 

 

Operating income

 

 

68,440 

 

 

55,405 

 

 

13,035 

 

Gain on sale of real estate, net

 

 

4,959 

 

 

 —

 

 

4,959 

(5)

Income from continuing operations

 

 

73,399 

 

 

55,405 

 

 

17,994 

 

Discontinued operations:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Income from discontinued operations

 

 

 —

 

 

805 

 

 

(805)

(6)

Gain on sale of real estate, net

 

 

 —

 

 

1,605 

 

 

(1,605)

(6)

Net income from discontinued operations

 

 

 —

 

 

2,410 

 

 

(2,410)

 

Net income

 

 

73,399 

 

 

57,815 

 

 

15,584 

 

Income allocated to participating securities

 

 

(481)

 

 

(383)

 

 

(98)

 

Income allocated to preferred stockholders

 

 

(3,273)

 

 

(3,273)

 

 

 —

 

Net income available to common stockholders

 

$

69,645 

 

$

54,159 

 

$

15,486 

 


(1)

Increased due to acquisitions, developments and capital improvement investments.

(2)

Increased primarily due to mortgage loan originations and capital improvement funding under certain mortgage loans partially offset by payoffs and normal amortization of mortgage loans.

(3)

Increased primarily due to the sale of senior unsecured notes.

(4)

During 2013, we recorded a one-time mortgage loan loss reserve related to a mortgage loan origination and wrote off $869 of straight-line rent receivable related to the transition of four assisted living properties to a new lessee.

(5)

Represents the gain on sale of two assisted living properties and the gain on sale of 16 assisted living properties sold to an affiliate of Enlivant partially offset by the loss on sale of a school. See Investing Activities below for further discussion of the transactions relating to the properties formerly co-leased to affiliates of Extendicare, Inc. and Enlivant. During 2014, we adopted a new accounting principle which only requires the presentation of discontinued operations if a disposal represents a strategic shift in operations. The new accounting principle is applied prospectively to all disposals subsequent to the adoption. The 2014 disposals did not represent strategic shifts in our operations. As a result, we did not reclassify results of operations for these disposed properties. 

(6)

Represents the net gain on sale of seven skilled nursing properties and the corresponding net results of operations from those sold properties.

37


Table of Contents

Year ended December 31, 2013 compared to year ended December 31, 2012 (in thousands)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Years ended December 31,

 

 

 

 

 

 

2013

 

2012

 

Difference

 

Revenues:

    

 

    

    

 

    

    

 

    

 

Rental income

 

$

98,166 

 

$

86,022 

 

$

12,144 

(1)

Interest income from mortgage loans

 

 

6,298 

 

 

5,496 

 

 

802 

(2)

Interest and other income

 

 

510 

 

 

964 

 

 

(454)

(3)

Total revenues

 

 

104,974 

 

 

92,482 

 

 

12,492 

 

Expenses:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interest expense

 

 

11,364 

 

 

9,932 

 

 

1,432 

(4)

Depreciation and amortization

 

 

24,389 

 

 

21,613 

 

 

2,776 

(5)

Provision (recovery) for doubtful accounts

 

 

2,180 

 

 

(101)

 

 

2,281 

(6)

General and administrative expenses

 

 

11,636 

 

 

10,732 

 

 

904 

(7)

Total expenses

 

 

49,569 

 

 

42,176 

 

 

7,393 

 

Income from continuing operations

 

 

55,405 

 

 

50,306 

 

 

5,099 

 

Discontinued operations:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Income from discontinued operations

 

 

805 

 

 

1,005 

 

 

(200)

(8)

Gain on sale of real estate, net

 

 

1,605 

 

 

16 

 

 

1,589 

(9)

Net income from discontinued operations

 

 

2,410 

 

 

1,021 

 

 

1,389 

 

Net income

 

 

57,815 

 

 

51,327 

 

 

6,488 

 

Income allocated to non-controlling interests

 

 

 —

 

 

(37)

 

 

37 

(10)

Net income attributable to LTC Properties, Inc.

 

 

57,815 

 

 

51,290 

 

 

6,525 

 

Income allocated to participating securities

 

 

(383)

 

 

(377)

 

 

(6)

 

Income allocated to preferred stockholders

 

 

(3,273)

 

 

(3,273)

 

 

 —

 

Net income available to common stockholders

 

$

54,159 

 

$

47,640 

 

$

6,519 

 


(1)

Increased due to acquisitions, developments and capital improvement investments.

(2)

Increased primarily due to mortgage loan originations and capital improvement funding under certain mortgage loans partially offset by normal amortization of existing mortgage loans.

(3)

Decreased primarily due to the redemption of the Skilled Healthcare Group Senior Subordinated Notes and a lower bankruptcy settlement distribution from Sunwest in 2013 than in 2012.

(4)

Increased primarily due to the sale of senior unsecured notes.

(5)

Increased due to acquisitions, developments and capital improvement investments.

(6)

During 2013, we recorded a one-time mortgage loan loss reserve related to a mortgage loan origination and wrote off $869 of straight-line rent receivable related to the transition of four assisted living properties to a new lessee.

(7)

Increased primarily due to the one‑time severance and accelerated restricted stock vesting charges related to the retirement of our former Senior Vice President, Marketing and Strategic Planning and higher salaries and benefits reflective of increased staffing levels.

(8)

Includes the financial results from properties sold during 2013 and 2012.

(9)

During 2013, we sold seven skilled nursing properties with a total of 277 beds for $11,001. During 2012, we sold a 140‑bed skilled nursing property for $1,248.

(10)

Decreased due to the conversion of all 112,588 limited partnership units during 2012.

38

 
 Years ended December 31,  
 
 
 2013 2012 Difference 

Revenues:

          

Rental income

 $98,166 $86,022 $12,144  (1)

Interest income from mortgage loans

  6,298  5,496  802  (2)

Interest and other income

  510  964  (454)(3)
        

Total revenues

  104,974  92,482  12,492 
        

Expenses:

          

Interest expense

  11,364  9,932  1,432  (4)

Depreciation and amortization

  24,389  21,613  2,776  (5)

Provision (recovery) for doubtful accounts

  2,180  (101) 2,281  (2)

General and administrative expenses

  11,636  10,732  904  (6)
        

Total expenses

  49,569  42,176  7,393 
        

Income from continuing operations

  55,405  50,306  5,099 

Discontinued operations:

          

Income from discontinued operations

  805  1,005  (200)(7)

Gain on sale of assets, net

  1,605  16  1,589  (8)
        

Net income from discontinued operations

  2,410  1,021  1,389 
        

Net income

  57,815  51,327  6,488 

Income allocated to non-controlling interests

    (37) 37  (9)
        

Net income attributable to LTC Properties, Inc. 

  57,815  51,290  6,525 
        

Income allocated to participating securities

  (383) (377) (6)

Income allocated to preferred stockholders

  (3,273) (3,273)  
        

Net income available to common stockholders

 $54,159 $47,640 $6,519 
        
        

(1)
Increased due to acquisitions and completed development projects.
(2)
Increased primarily due to origination of a $124,387 mortgage loan and $4,971 funding under a mortgage and construction loan partially offset by normal amortization of existing mortgage loans.
(3)
Decreased primarily due to the redemption of the Skilled Healthcare Group Senior Subordinated Notes and a lower bankruptcy settlement distribution from Sunwest in 2013 than in 2012.
(4)
Increased primarily due to the sale of senior unsecured notes to fund investments.
(5)
Increased due to acquisitions, developments and capital improvement investments.
(6)
Increased primarily due to the one-time severance and accelerated restricted stock vesting charges related to the retirement of our former Senior Vice President, Marketing and Strategic Planning and higher salaries and benefits reflective of increased staffing levels.
(7)
Includes the financial results from properties sold during 2013 and 2012.
(8)
During 2013, we sold seven skilled nursing properties with a total of 277 beds for $11,001. During 2012, we sold a 140-bed skilled nursing property for $1,248.
(9)
Decreased due to the conversion of all 112,588 limited partnership units during 2012.

Year ended December 31, 2012 compared to year ended December 31, 2011 (in thousands)

 
 Years ended December 31,  
 
 
 2012 2011 Difference 

Revenues:

          

Rental income

 $86,022 $76,096 $9,926(1)

Interest income from mortgage loans

  5,496  6,411  (915)(2)

Interest and other income

  964  1,111  (147)(3)
        

Total revenues

  92,482  83,618  8,864 
        

Expenses:

          

Interest expense

  9,932  6,434  3,498(4)

Depreciation and amortization

  21,613  18,911  2,702(5)

Recovery for doubtful accounts

  (101) (13) (88)(2)

General and administrative expenses

  10,732  9,666  1,066(6)
        

Total expenses

  42,176  34,998  7,178 
        

Income from continuing operations

  50,306  48,620  1,686 

Discontinued operations:

          

Loss from discontinued operations

  1,005  823  182(7)

Gain on sale of assets, net

  16    16(8)
        

Net (loss) income from discontinued operations

  1,021  823  198 
        

Net income

  51,327  49,443  1,884 

Income allocated to non-controlling interests

  (37) (191) 154(9)
        

Net income attributable to LTC Properties, Inc. 

  51,290  49,252  2,038 
        

Income allocated to participating securities

  (377) (342) (35)(10)

Income allocated to preferred stockholders

  (3,273) (9,078) 5,805(11)
        

Net income available to common stockholders

 $47,640 $39,832 $7,808 
        
        

(1)
Increased due to acquisitions.
(2)
Decreased primarily due to payoffs and normal amortizationTable of existing mortgage loans partially offset by origination of two mortgage loans totaling $7,719.
(3)
Decreased primarily due to the redemption of the Skilled Healthcare Group Senior Subordinated Notes.
(4)
Increased primarily due to an increase in bank borrowing and the sale of senior unsecured notes to fund investments.
(5)
Increased due to acquisitions, developments and capital improvement investments.
(6)
Increased primarily due to higher expense related to vesting of restricted stock granted, increased salaries and benefits reflective of increased staffing levels, and bonuses related to the increased volume of transactions completed during 2012.
(7)
Includes the financial results from properties sold during 2013 and 2012.
(8)
Gain on sale of a 140-bed skilled nursing property in Texas for $1,248.
(9)
Decreased due to the conversion of all 112,588 limited partnership units during 2012.
(10)
Increased due the grant of 90,500 shares of restricted common stock during 2012.
(11)
Decreased due to the redemption of all of our Series F preferred stock.
Contents

Funds From Operations

Funds from Operations (or FFO) available to common stockholders, basic FFO available to common stockholders per share and diluted FFO available to common stockholders per share are supplemental measures of a REIT'sREIT’s financial performance that are not defined by U.S. GAAP. Real estate values historically rise and fall with market conditions, but cost accounting for real estate assets in accordance with U.S. GAAP assumes that the value of real estate assets diminishes predictably over time. We believe that by excluding the effect of historical cost depreciation, which may be of limited


relevance in evaluating current performance, FFO facilitates comparisons of operating performance between periods.

We use FFO as a supplemental performance measurement of our cash flow generated by operations. FFO does not represent cash generated from operating activities in accordance with U.S. GAAP, and is not necessarily indicative of cash available to fund cash needs and should not be considered an alternative to net income available to common stockholders.

We calculate and report FFO in accordance with the definition and interpretive guidelines issued by the National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts (or NAREIT). FFO, as defined by NAREIT, means net income available to common stockholders (computed in accordance with U.S. GAAP) excluding gains or losses on the sale of real estate and impairment write-downswrite‑downs of depreciable real estate plus real estate depreciation and amortization, and after adjustments for unconsolidated partnerships and joint ventures. Our calculation of FFO may not be comparable to FFO reported by other REITs that do not define the term in accordance with the current NAREIT definition or that have a different interpretation of the current NAREIT definition from us; therefore, caution should be exercised when comparing our FFO to that of other REITs.

The following table reconciles net income available to common stockholders to FFO available to common stockholders (unaudited, amounts in thousands, except per share amounts):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

For the year ended December 31,

 

 

 

2014

 

2013

 

2012

 

Net income available to common stockholders

    

$

69,645 

    

$

54,159 

    

$

47,640 

 

Add: Depreciation and amortization (including continuing and discontinued operations)

 

 

25,529 

 

 

24,706 

 

 

22,153 

 

Less: Gain on sale of real estate, net

 

 

(4,959)

 

 

(1,605)

 

 

(16)

 

FFO available to common stockholders(1)

 

$

90,215 

 

$

77,260 

 

$

69,777 

 

FFO available to common stockholders per share:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Basic

 

$

2.61 

 

$

2.33 

 

$

2.31 

 

Diluted(1)(2)

 

$

2.55 

 

$

2.29 

 

$

2.26 

 

Weighted average shares used to calculate FFO per share:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Basic

 

 

34,617 

 

 

33,111 

 

 

30,238 

 

Diluted(2)

 

 

36,866 

 

 

35,342 

 

 

32,508 

 


(1)

For the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013, FFO for diluted FFO per share includes income allocated to the participating securities and income allocated the preferred stockholders. For the year ended December 31, 2012, FFO for diluted FFO per share includes income allocated to the participating securities, income allocated the preferred stockholders and income allocated to non‑controlling interests.

(2)

For the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013, weighted average shares for diluted FFO per share includes stock option common stock equivalents, participating securities and Series C Cumulative Convertible Preferred Stock. For the year ended December 31, 2012, weighted average shares for diluted FFO per share includes stock option common stock equivalents, participating securities, Series C Cumulative Convertible Preferred Stock and convertible non‑controlling interests.

39


 
 For the year ended December 31, 
 
 2013 2012 2011 

Net income available to common stockholders

 $54,159 $47,640 $39,832 

Add: Depreciation and amortization (including continuing and discontinued operations)

  24,706  22,153  19,623 

Less: Gain on sale of real estate, net

  (1,605) (16)  
        

FFO available to common stockholders

 $77,260 $69,777 $59,455 
        
        

FFO available to common stockholders per share:

          

Basic

 $2.33 $2.31 $2.04 
        
        

Diluted

 $2.29 $2.26 $2.01 
        
        

Weighted average shares used to calculate FFO per share:

          

Basic

  33,111  30,238  29,194 
        
        

Diluted

  35,342  32,508  31,539 
        
        

Table of Contents

Critical Accounting Policies

Preparation of the consolidated financial statements in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (U.S. GAAP) requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes. Actual results could differ from those estimates. SeeItem 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—Note 2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies for a description of the significant accounting policies we followed in preparing the consolidated financial statements for all periods presented. We have identified the following significant accounting policies as critical accounting policies in that they require significant judgment and estimates and have the most impact on financial reporting.

Impairments.  Impairment losses are recorded when events or changes in circumstances indicate the asset is impaired and the estimated undiscounted cash flows to be generated by the asset are less than its carrying amount. Management assesses the impairment of properties individually and impairment losses are calculated as the excess of the carrying amount over the fair value of assets to be


held and used, and carrying amount over the fair value less cost to sell in instances where management has determined that we will dispose of the property. In determining fair value, we use current appraisals or other third party opinions of value and other estimates of fair value such as estimated discounted future cash flows.

Also, we evaluate the carrying values of mortgage loans receivable on an individual basis. Management periodically evaluates the realizability of future cash flows from the mortgage loan receivable when events or circumstances, such as the non-receiptnon‑receipt of principal and interest payments and/or significant deterioration of the financial condition of the borrower, indicate that the carrying amount of the mortgage loan receivable may not be recoverable. An impairment charge is recognized in current period earnings and is calculated as the difference between the carrying amount of the mortgage loan receivable and the discounted cash flows expected to be received, or if foreclosure is probable, the fair value of the collateral securing the mortgage.

        Accounting Standards Codification No. 320,Investments—Debt and Equity Securities (or ASC 320), requires an entity to assess whether it intends to sell, or it is more likely than not that it will be required to sell, a debt security in an unrealized loss position before recovery of its amortized cost basis. If either of these criteria is met, the entire difference between fair value and amortized cost is recognized as impairment through earnings. For securities that do not meet the aforementioned criteria, the amount of impairment is split into two components as follows: 1) other-than-temporary impairment (or OTTI) related to other factors such as an entity's ability to make scheduled interest or principal payments on the debt securities, which is recognized in other comprehensive income and 2) OTTI related to credit loss, which must be recognized in the income statement. The credit loss is determined as the difference between the present value of the cash flows expected to be collected and the amortized cost basis.

Owned Properties.  We make estimates as part of our allocation of the purchase price of acquisitions to the various components of the acquisition based upon the relative fair value of each component. In determining fair value, we use current appraisals or other third party opinions of value. The most significant components of our allocations are typically the allocation of fair value to land and buildings and, for certain of our acquisitions, in-placein‑place leases and other intangible assets. In the case of the fair value of buildings and the allocation of value to land and other intangibles, the estimates of the values of these components will affect the amount of depreciation and amortization we record over the estimated useful life of the property acquired or the remaining lease term. In the case of the value of in-placein‑place leases, the appraiserswe make best estimates based on the evaluation of the specific characteristics of each tenant'stenant’s lease. Factors considered include estimates of carrying costs during hypothetical expected lease-uplease‑up periods, market conditions and costs to execute similar leases. These assumptions affect the amount of future revenue that we will recognize over the remaining lease term for the acquired in-placein‑place leases. We evaluate each purchase transaction to determine whether the acquired assets meet the definition of a business. Transaction costs related to acquisitions that are not deemed to be businesses are included in the cost basis of the acquired assets, while transaction costs related to acquisitions that are deemed to be businesses are expensed as incurred.

Mortgage Loans Receivable.  Mortgage loans receivable we originate are recorded on an amortized cost basis. Mortgage loans we acquire are recorded at fair value at the time of purchase net of any related premium or discount which is amortized as a yield adjustment to interest income over the life of the loan. We maintain a valuation allowance based upon the expected collectability of our mortgage loans receivable. Changes in the valuation allowance are included in current period earnings.

Revenue Recognition.  Interest income on mortgage loans is recognized using the effective interest method. We follow a policy related to mortgage interest whereby we consider a loan to be non-performingnon‑performing after 60 days of non-paymentnon‑payment of amounts due and do not recognize unpaid mortgage interest income from that loan until the past due amounts have been received.


40


 

Table of Contents

Rental income from operating leases is generally recognized on a straight-linestraight‑line basis over the terms of the leases. Substantially all of our leases contain provisions for specified annual increases over the rents of the prior year and are generally computed in one of four methods depending on specific provisions of each lease as follows:

(i)

a specified annual increase over the prior year’s rent, generally between 2.0% and 3.0%;

(ii)

a calculation based on the Consumer Price Index;

(iii)

as a percentage of facility revenues in excess of base amounts or

(iv)

specific dollar increases.

The FASB does not provide for the recognition of contingent revenue until all possible contingencies have been eliminated. We consider the operating history of the lessee and the general condition of the industry when evaluating whether all possible contingencies have been eliminated and have historically, and expect in the future, to not include contingent rents as income until received. We follow a policy related to rental income whereby we consider a lease to be non-performingnon‑performing after 60 days of non-paymentnon‑payment of past due amounts and do not recognize unpaid rental income from that lease until the amounts have been received.

Rental revenues relating to non-contingentnon‑contingent leases that contain specified rental increases over the life of the lease are recognized on the straight-linestraight‑line basis. Recognizing income on a straight-linestraight‑line basis requires us to calculate the total non-contingentnon‑contingent rent containing specified rental increases over the life of the lease and to recognize the revenue evenly over that life. This method results in rental income in the early years of a lease being higher than actual cash received, creating a straight-linestraight‑line rent receivable asset included in our consolidated balance sheet. At some point during the lease, depending on its terms, the cash rent payments eventually exceed the straight-linestraight‑line rent which results in the straight-linestraight‑line rent receivable asset decreasing to zero over the remainder of the lease term. We assess the collectability of straight-linestraight‑line rent in accordance with the applicable accounting standards and our reserve policy. If the lessee becomes delinquent in rent owed under the terms of the lease, we may provide a reserve against the recognized straight-linestraight‑line rent receivable asset for a portion, up to its full value, that we estimate may not be recoverable.

Payments made to or on behalf of our lessees represent incentives that are deferred and amortized as a yield adjustment over the term of the lease on a straight-line basis. Net loan fee income and commitment fee income are amortized over the life of the related loan. Costs associated

In May 2014, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2014-09 (or ASU 2014-09), Revenue from Contracts with leases are deferred and allocated over the lease term in proportion toCustomers: Topic 606. ASU 2014-09 provides for a single comprehensive principles based standard for the recognition of rental income.revenue across all industries through the application of the following five-step process:

Step 1: Identify the contract(s) with a customer.

Step 2: Identify the performance obligations in the contract.

Step 3: Determine the transaction price.

Step 4: Allocate the transaction price to the performance obligations in the contract.

Step 5: Recognize revenue when (or as) the entity satisfies a performance obligation.

ASU 2014-09 requires expanded disclosures about the nature, amount, timing and uncertainty of revenue and cash flows arising from contracts with customers. ASU 2014-09 is effective for annual reporting periods (including interim reporting periods within those periods) beginning after December 15, 2016. Early adoption is not permitted. We are evaluating the effects of this adoption on our consolidated financial statements.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Operating Activities:

At December 31, 2013,2014, our gross real estate investment portfolio (before accumulated depreciation and amortization) consisted of $937.6$949.8 million invested primarily in owned long term health care properties and mortgage loans of approximately $167.1$167.3 million (prior to deducting a $1.7 million reserve). Our portfolio consists of investments in 10097 skilled nursing properties 106(or SNF), 92 assisted living properties 9(or ALF), eight range of care properties (or ROC), one school, two schools, six parcels of land under development and fourfive parcels of land held-for-use.held‑for‑use. These properties are located in 30

41


Table of Contents

29 states. Assisted living properties includeOur ALF classification includes assisted living, independent living and memory care properties. Range of care properties consistand our ROC classification consists of properties providing skilled nursing and any combination of assisted living, independent living and/or memory care services. For the year ended December 31, 2013,2014, we had net cash provided by operating activities of $86.2$95.8 million.

For the year ended December 31, 20132014 we recorded $4.0recognized $3.0 million in straight-linestraight‑line rental income and $37,000$30,000 in straight-linestraight‑line rent receivable reserve. DuringOur lease with affiliates of Extendicare, Inc. (or Extendicare) and Enlivant covering 37 assisted living properties expired on December 31, 2014. Effective January 1, 2015, we re-leased 20 of the fourth quarter37 properties by adding 13 properties to an existing master lease and entering into a new master lease for seven of 2013, we wrote-off a $0.9 million straight-line rent receivable balance relatedthe properties. See Investing Activities below for further discussion of the transactions relating to the transitionproperties formerly co-leased to affiliates of four assisted living


properties to a new lessee.Extendicare and Enlivant. For the remaining leases in place at December 31, 2013,2014, including the new leases effective January 1, 2015 for 20 properties formerly co-leased by Extendicare and Enlivant, and assuming no modification or replacement of existing leases and no new leased investments are added to our portfolio, we currently expect that straight-linestraight‑line rental income will decreaseincrease from $3.9$3.0 million in 20132014 to $2.2$6.9 million for projected annual 20142015 primarily due to the new leases effective January 1, 2015 for 20 properties, as previously discussed, and conversely,completed development projects. Conversely, our cash rental income is projected to increasedecrease from $96.0$99.7 million in 20132014 to $97.5$98.1 million for projected annual 2014.2015 primarily due to the sale of 16 properties to Enlivant partially offset by completed development projects. During the year ended December 31, 2013,2014, we received $96.0$99.7 million of cash rental revenue and recorded $0.7$0.8 million of amortized lease inducement cost.inducement. At December 31, 2014, the straight‑line rent receivable balance, net of reserves, on the consolidated balance sheet was $32.7 million.

Investing Activities:

For the year ended December 31, 2013,2014, we used $164.0$29.0 million of cash for investing activities. The following table summarizes our acquisitions during 2013(dollar amounts in thousands):

Type of Property
 Purchase
Price
 Transaction
Costs
 Total
Acquisition
Costs
 Number
of
Properties
 Number
of
Beds/Units
 

Skilled Nursing(1)

 $14,402 $58 $14,460  1  120 

Land(2)

  4,638    4,638     
            

Totals

 $19,040 $58 $19,098  1  120 
            
            

(1)
A skilled nursingWe acquired a 48-unit assisted living property located in Florida whichColorado for $9.8 million and recorded $0.1 million in transaction costs. The property was added to aan existing master lease at an incremental initial cash yield of 8.75%.
(2)
6.5% and we provided the lessee with contingent earn-out payments as a lease inducement. The contingent earn-out payments require us to pay two earn-out payments totaling up to $4.0 million, payable in increments of $2.0 million upon the property achieving a sustainable stipulated rent coverage ratio. We estimated the fair value of the contingent payment using a discounted cash flow analysis. This fair value measurement is based on significant input not observable in the market and thus represents a Level 3 measurement. The estimated fair value of $3.2 million was recorded at the date of the acquisition and master lease amendment as a lease inducement which is amortized as a yield adjustment over the life of the lease and a contingent earn-out liability which is accreted to the estimated settlement amount as of the estimated payment date. The fair value of these contingent liabilities will be evaluated on a quarterly basis based on changes in estimates of future operating results and changes in market discount rates. During 2014, we recorded non‑cash interest expense of $18,000 related to this contingent liabilities and the fair value of these contingent payments was $3.3 million at December 31, 2014.    

During 2014, we purchased threea parcel of land held-for-use in Michigan for $0.5 million. Additionally, we purchased a vacant parcelsparcel of land in ColoradoIllinois for a total of $3,475$1.4 million under a development pipeline agreement whereby we have the opportunity to finance any senior housing development project or acquisition originated by an operator through May 2018 (unless earlier terminated as provided for therein).operator. The land was added to an existing master lease and we entered into development commitments in an amount not to exceed $30,256$12.2 million, including the land purchase, to fund the construction of threea 66-unit memory care properties, twoproperty. See below for our total development, redevelopment, renovation and expansion project commitments.

Subsequent to December 31, 2014, we funded $7.2 million under a $12.2 million development commitment to purchase the land and existing improvements and then complete the related development of a 56-unit memory care property currently under construction in Texas. In conjunction with 60 unitsthis commitment, we entered into a master lease agreement for an initial term of 15 years with three 5-year renewal options at an initial cash yield of 8.75% escalating annually thereafter by the lesser of (i) a calculation based on the Consumer Price Index or (ii) 2.25%. The master lease provides for our payment of a lease inducement of up to $1.6 million, which will be amortized as a yield adjustment over the lease term, with up to 25% of the fee to be disbursed shortly after closing and the balance following the issuance of a certificate of occupancy and receipt of any other with 48 units. Weregulatory approval required for the operation of the 56-unit memory care property. The master lease also purchased four parcelsprovides us a right to provide similar financing for certain future development opportunities.  

42


Also, subsequent to December 31, 2014, we elected to exercise our right to provide financing for one such opportunity, adding to the master lease a parcel of land held-for-usepurchased in MichiganSouth Carolina for $1,163.

        As part$2.5 million coupled with our commitment to provide the operator with up to $16.4 million, including the land purchase, for the development of an acquisition89-unit combination assisted living and memory care property. In conjunction with this new development commitment, the master lease provided for an additional $2.4 million of lease inducement, which will be amortized as a yield adjustment over the lease term, with up to 25% of the fee to be disbursed shortly after closing and the balance following the issuance of a certificate of occupancy and receipt of any other regulatory approval required for the operation of the 89-unit combination assisted living and memory care property.  

During 2014, we sold two assisted living properties located in 2011,Florida and Georgia with a total of 133 units, a school located in Minnesota, and a closed skilled nursing property for a combined sales price of $8.1 million, resulting in net sales proceeds of $7.9 million and net gain on sale of $1.1 million.

Our master lease with affiliates of Extendicare and Enlivant (formerly known as Assisted Living Concepts, Inc.) covering 37 assisted living properties with a total of 1,429 units expired on December 31, 2014. For the year ended December 31, 2014, this portfolio generated approximately $11.0 million or 9.3% of our combined rental revenue and interest income from mortgage loans. During the fourth quarter of 2014, we committed to provide a contingent payment if certain operational thresholds were met. The contingent payment was recorded at fair value, which was estimated using a discounted cash flow analysis, and we accreted the contingent liabilityentered into three agreements relating to the settlement amount37 assisted living properties as follows:

·

We sold 16 properties, consisting of 615 units located in Washington, Oregon, Idaho and Arizona to an affiliate of Enlivant for a sales price of $26.5 million. Accordingly, we recognized a gain on sale of $3.8 million. We also gave Enlivant consent to close a property located in Oregon. We are currently exploring sale and lease options for this property which has a net book value of $0.9 million.

·

We added 13 properties with 500 units in Indiana, Iowa, Ohio, Nebraska and New Jersey to an existing master lease with an affiliate of Senior Lifestyle Management (or Senior Lifestyle). Beginning January 1, 2015, the initial term of the amended and restated master lease will be 15 years and rent will increase by $5.1 million over the current annual rent, increasing by 2.6% annually thereafter.

·

We re-leased seven properties with 278 units in Texas to Veritas InCare (or Veritas) under a new 10-year master lease. Beginning January 1, 2015, the initial rent will be $1.5 million increasing 2.5% annually.

Extendicare and Enlivant paid rent in accordance with the terms of the payment date.current master leases through December 31, 2014. The fair value of such contingent liability was re-evaluatedinitial cash yield on a quarterly basis based on changes in estimates of future operating resultsthe 20 properties re-leased to Senior Lifestyle and changes in market discount rates. During 2013, we paid $7.0 million relatedVeritas is comparable to the contingent liability. Accordingly, we have no remaining contingent liability ascash yield in 2014 under the expiring master leases with Extendicare and Enlivant. Additionally, the new and amended master leases will provide us with the potential for additional rent attributable to participation in revenue growth at the properties over a predetermined base amount.

43


Table of December 31, 2013.Contents

During the twelve months ended December 31, 2013, a lessee exercised its option to purchase six skilled nursing properties located2014, we completed the following development and improvement projects (dollar amounts in Ohio with a total of 230 beds for an all cash purchase price of $11.0 million. As a result, we recorded a $2.6 million gain on sale. Also, during 2013, we sold a 47-bed skilled nursing property in Colorado for $1,000 and recognized a loss of $1.0 million on the sale.thousands):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    

Number

    

 

    

Number

    

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

 

 

of

 

Type of

 

of

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Type of Project

 

Properties

 

Property

 

Beds/Units

 

State

 

2014 Funding

 

Total Funding

 

Development

 

1

 

ALF

 

60

 

Colorado

 

$

6,351 

 

$

9,689 

(1)

Development

 

1

 

ALF

 

80

 

Texas

 

 

2,300 

 

 

5,691 

(2)

Development

 

1

 

SNF

 

143

 

Kentucky

 

 

10,579 

 

 

20,904 

(3)

Development

 

1

 

ALF

 

48

 

Colorado

 

 

7,257 

 

 

8,744 

(4)

Expansion/Renovation

 

1

 

ALF

 

72

 

Colorado

 

 

6,371 

 

 

6,376 

 

Expansion/Renovation

 

2

 

ALF

 

123

 

Colorado

 

 

5,091 

 

 

5,095 

 

Improvements

 

1

 

SNF

 

120

 

Florida

 

 

500 

 

 

500 

 

Improvements

 

2

 

SNF

 

235

 

New Mexico

 

 

319 

 

 

1,746 

 

 

 

10

 

 

 

881

 

 

 

$

38,768 

(5)

$

58,745 

(5)


(1)

Development of a memory care property completed in August 2014.  The total funded amount includes acquired land of $1,200.

(2)

Development of a memory care property completed in October 2014. The total funded amount includes acquired land of $1,000.

(3)

Completed in October 2014 and total funded amount includes acquired land of $2,050.

(4)

Development of a memory care property completed in December 2014. The total funded amount includes acquired land of $850.

(5)

In 2014, we funded $500 to purchase Texas Medicaid bed rights for a 122-bed skilled nursing property under an existing lease. Additionally, during 2014, we funded the final commitment balance of $551 on a newly developed 77-unit assisted living property in Kansas which opened in 2013. Subsequent to December 31, 2014, we funded an additional $4,711 under these completed projects.

During the twelve months ended December 31, 2013, we completed the following construction projects:

Completed Date
 Type of Property Number
of
Beds/Units
 State Completed Date 2013 Funding Total Funding 

Jul 2013

 Assisted Living(1)  60 Colorado  Jul 2013 $4,316 $9,850 

Jul 2013

 Skilled Nursing(2)  120 Texas  Jul 2013  5,065  8,635 

Oct 2013

 Assisted Living(3)  77 Kansas  Oct 2013  8,081  9,675 
               

 Totals  257      $17,462 $28,160 
               
               

(1)
This new property is a Memory Care property. The funded amount includes acquired land of $1,882.

(2)
This new property replaces a skilled nursing property in our existing portfolio.
(3)
The funded amount includes acquired land of $730.

        During the year ended December 31, 2013,2014, we received $1.9$2.2 million in regularly scheduled principal payments fromand received $7.0 million plus accrued interest related to the early payoff of two mortgage loans secured by three skilled nursing properties and one assisted living property. Subsequent to December 31, 2014, we received $2.3 million plus accrued interest for the payoff of a mortgage loan secured by one range of care property. During 2014, we originated a $3.0 million mortgage loan secured by a 100-unit independent living property in Arizona. The loan is for a term of five years and bears interest at 7.0%, escalating 0.25% annually.

We fully funded a $10.6 million mortgage and construction loan with final funding of $3.0 million in 2014. This mortgage and construction loan was secured by a skilled nursing property and a newly constructed 106-bed replacement skilled nursing property. Upon completion of the 106-bed replacement skilled nursing property, the residents of the old skilled nursing property were relocated to the new skilled nursing property and the old skilled nursing property was closed. During 2014, the old skilled nursing property was sold by the borrower and released as collateral. Subsequent to December 31, 2014, we purchased and equipped the replacement property for a total of $13.9 million by exercising our mortgage loans.option under the agreement. The property was added to an existing master lease at a lease rate equivalent to the interest rate in effect on the loan at the time the purchase option was exercised. Additionally, we paid the lessee a $1.1 million lease inducement which will be amortized as a yield adjustment over the life of the lease term.

During 2013, we funded athe initial amount of $124.4 million under a mortgage loan with a third-partythird‑party operator, Prestige Healthcare (or Prestige), secured by 15 skilled nursing properties with a total of 2,0922,058 beds in Michigan. The loan is for a term of 30 years and bears interest at 9.53% for five years, escalating annually thereafter by 2.25%. Payments are interest-only for three years, after which the borrower will make interest payments along with annual principal payments of $1.0 million. The loan agreement provides for additional forward commitments of $12.0 million for capital improvements at 9.41% for the first twelve months. The loan agreement also provides,and, under certain conditions and based on certain operating metrics and valuation thresholds achieved and sustained within the firstinitial twelve years of the term, for additional loan proceeds of up to $40.0 million of additional proceeds, for a total loan commitment of up to $176.4 million. During 2014, we funded $3.4 million under the $12.0 million capital improvement commitment with such proceeds limited$8.7 million remaining as of December 31, 2014. Subsequent to $10.0December 31, 2014, we funded an additional $0.8 million per twelve months.under the $12.0 million capital improvement commitment, with a corresponding reduction in the remaining commitment balance to $7.9 million.

        The borrower hasIn addition, this mortgage loan provided Prestige a one-timeone‑time option between the third and twelfth years to prepay up to 50% of the then outstanding loan balance without penalty. ExclusivelySubsequent to December 31, 2014, we amended this mortgage loan to provide up to an

44


Table of Contents

additional $20.0 million in loan proceeds for the purposesredevelopment of this option, the properties collateralizing the loan have been separated by us into two pools of assets. If and when the option is exercised, we will identify which of the two pools we will release for prepayment and removal from portfolio of properties securing the loan. Ifloan (increasing the total capital improvement commitment to $32.0 million and the total loan commitment to $196.4 million) and agreed to convey, to Prestige, two parcels of land held-for-use adjacent to these properties to facilitate the projects. As partial consideration for the increased commitment and associated conveyance, the borrower forfeited their prepayment option. As a result of the forfeiture of the prepayment option, we expect to record $1.3 million of effective interest during 2015.

Additionally, in 2015, we originated an $11.0 million mortgage loan with Prestige concurrently funding $9.5 million with a commitment to fund the balance for approved capital improvement projects. The loan is exercisedsecured by a 157-bed skilled nursing property in Michigan and timely concluded,bears interest at 9.41% for five years, escalating annually thereafter by 2.25%. The term is 30 years with interest-only payments. After the borrower forfeits its opportunitythirteenth month of the commencement date, the interest rate on newly advanced amounts on the mortgage and construction loan will equal the greater of (i) 7.25% plus the positive difference, if any, between the average yield on the U.S. Treasury 10-year note for the twenty days prior to access any additional loan proceeds.funding or (ii) 9.0% with annual escalations of 2.25%. Additionally, we have the option to purchase the property under certain circumstances, including a change in regulatory environment,environment.

During 2014, we have the optionreceived principal payments of $0.1 million and we advanced principal of $1.3 million under notes receivable. Subsequent to purchase the properties.

        During the twelve months ended December 31, 2013,2014, we funded $5.0advanced $0.5 million of principal under a $10.6 million mortgage and construction loan. This loan is secured by a currently operating skilled nursing property and a vacant parcel of land upon which a 106-bed replacement facility is being constructed. As of December 31, 2013, we have a remaining commitment of $3.0 million under this loan.

notes receivable. During 2013, we received $3.0 million for the early repayment of two loans with interest ranging from 8.5% to 9.0%. Also during 2013,2014, we committed to fund three loans up to $0.4 million each with interest at 12%. Two of these loans mature in September 2017 and one matures in December 2017. We also committed to fund three pre-developmentfour pre‑development loans of $0.3 million each to facilitate the site selection and pre-construction servicespre‑construction costs for the future development of threefour memory care properties. The initial rate of each of these pre-developmentpre‑development loans is 12%, increasing by 25 basis points per year. EachOne of these pre-developmentpre‑development loans matured due to the acquisition of the land and the outstanding balance of $0.3 million was reclassified to real estate under development during 2014. Also, during 2014, we committed to fund a $0.5 million was capitalized under the development projects.

        As ofworking capital loan to an existing operator with interest at 6.5% maturing in December 2019. Subsequent to December 31, 2013,2014, we have seven loans and linecommitted to fund a working capital loan of credit agreements$0.5 million to an existing operator with a total commitment of $2.4 million and a remaining commitment balance of $1.8 million. The average interest rate of these loans is 11.5%. During 2013, we received principal payments, including loan payoffs, of $3.1 million and we advanced principal of $1.0 million.at 6.5% maturing in February 2019.

Financing Activities:

For the year ended December 31, 2013,2014, we had netused $48.3 million of cash providedfor financing activities. We paid off our multifamily tax-exempt revenue bonds that were secured by financing activities of $77.3 million. During 2013, we paidfive assisted living properties in Washington including $0.6 million in regularly scheduled principal payments and the remaining outstanding balance of $1.4 million.

During 2014, we amended our Unsecured Credit Agreement increasing the commitment to $400.0 million with the opportunity to increase the credit amount up to a total of $600.0 million. Additionally, the drawn pricing was decreased by 25 basis points and the maturity of the facility was extended to October 14, 2018. The amendment also provides for a one‑year extension option at our discretion, subject to customary conditions. Based on bonds payable. During the year endedour leverage ratios at December 31, 2013,2014, the amended facility provides for interest annually at LIBOR plus 115 basis points and the unused commitment fee was 25 basis points.

Financial covenants contained in the Unsecured Credit Agreement, which are measured quarterly, require us to maintain, among other things:

(i)

a ratio of total indebtedness to total asset value not greater than 0.5 to 1.0;

(ii)

a ratio of secured debt to total asset value not greater than 0.35 to 1.0;

(iii)

a ratio of unsecured debt to the value of the unencumbered asset value not greater than 0.6 to 1.0; and

(iv)

a ratio of EBITDA, as calculated in the Unsecured Credit Agreement, to fixed charges not less than 1.50 to 1.0.

During 2014, we borrowed $93.0$37.5 million and repaid $187.5$58.5 million under our unsecured revolving line of credits. At December 31, 2014, we had no outstanding borrowings under our Unsecured Credit Agreement and $400.0 million available for borrowing. Subsequent to December 31, 2014, we borrowed $18.0 million under our unsecured revolving line of credit. At December 31, 2013, we had $21.0 million outstanding at an interest rate of LIBOR plus 1.25% and $219.0 million available for borrowing. Subsequent to December 31, 2013, we borrowed $11.5 million at an interest rate of LIBOR plus 1.25%. Accordingly, we had $32.5have $18.0 million outstanding and $207.5$382.0 million available for borrowing. At December 31, 2013,2014, we were in compliance with all our covenants.


At December 31, 2013,2014, we had $255.8$281.6 million outstanding under our Senior Unsecured Notessenior unsecured notes with a weighted average interest rate of 4.85%4.81%. During 2013,2014, we sold $30.0 million senior unsecured term notes to affiliates and managed accounts of Prudential Investment Management, Inc. (or individuallyunder our Amended and collectively Prudential) $70.0 million aggregate principal amountRestated Note Purchase and Private Shelf

45


Table of 3.99% senior unsecured termContents

agreement. These notes fully amortizing to maturitybear interest at 4.5% and will mature on November 20, 2021.July 31, 2026. We used the proceeds to pay down our unsecured revolving line of credit.

        On October 30, 2013, we entered into an amended and restated note purchase and private shelf agreement with Prudential. The shelf agreement with Prudential, as amended, conforms As a result of the definitions and financial covenants contained therein and previously issuedsale of $30.0 million senior unsecured promissoryterm notes, outstanding to Prudentialour Amended and certain of its affiliatesRestated Note Purchase and managed accounts to those containedPrivate Shelf agreement has been exhausted with no more availability. Also, during 2014, we paid $4.2 million in regularly scheduled principal payments on our unsecured credit facility and to covenants contained in the senior unsecured notes sold in July 2012. Any notes sold by us to Prudential under the shelf agreement will be in amounts at fixed interest rates and have maturity dates (each note to have a final maturity not greater than 12 years and an average life not greater than 10 years from the date of issuance) subject to further agreement by us and Prudential.notes.

        The shelf agreement with Prudential contains standard covenants including requirements to maintain financial ratios such as debt to asset value ratios. Under the shelf agreement, maximum total indebtedness shall not exceed 50% of total asset value as defined in the shelf agreement, as amended. Borrowings under the shelf agreement are limited by reference to the value of unencumbered assets. Under the shelf agreement, maximum unsecured debt shall not exceed 60% of the value of the unencumbered asset pool as defined in the shelf agreement.

During 2013,2014, we sold 4,025,000600,000 shares of common stock at a price of $44.50$41.50 per share before fees and costs of $7.7 million, in a public offering.registered direct placement to certain institutional investors. The net proceeds of $171.4$24.6 million were used to pay down amounts outstanding under our unsecured revolving line of credit, to fund acquisitionscurrent developments and our current development commitments andfor general corporate purposes. During the twelve months ended December 31, 2013, we acquired 6,925 shares of common stock held by employees who tendered owned shares to satisfy tax withholding obligations.

        During 2013, we terminated an equity distribution agreement which allowed us to issue and sell, from time to time, up to $85.7 million in aggregate offering price of our common shares. Sales of common shares were made by means of ordinary brokers' transactions at market prices, in block transactions, or as otherwise agreed between us and our sales agents. During 2013, we sold 126,742 shares of common stock for $4.9 million in net proceeds under our equity distribution agreement. In conjunction with the sale of common stock, we reclassified $0.7 million of accumulated costs associated with the equity distribution agreement to additional paid in capital.

We paid cash dividends on our 8.5% Series C Cumulative Convertible Preferred Stock totaling $3.3 million. Additionally, we declared and paid cash dividends on our common stock totaling $63.6$71.2 million. In January 2014,2015, we declared a monthly cash dividend of $0.17 per share on our common stock for the months of January, February and March 20142015 payable on January 31,30, February 2827 and March 28, 2014,31, 2015, respectively, to stockholders of record on January 23,22, February 2019 and March 21, 2014,23, 2015, respectively.

At December 31, 2013,2014, we had a 2008 Equity Participation Plan, under which 600,000 shares of common stock have been reserved for awards, including nonqualified stock option grants and restricted stock grants to officers, employees, non-employeenon‑employee directors and consultants. The terms of the awards


granted under the 2008 Equity Participation Plan are set by our compensation committee at its discretion. Dividends are payable on the restricted shares to the extent and on the same date as dividends are paid on all of our common stock. During 2013,2014, we granted 34,40095,000 shares of restricted common stock as follows:

No. of Shares
 Price per
Share
 Vesting Period
 8,400 $46.54 ratably over 3 years
 6,000 $41.83 ratably over 3 years
 20,000 $36.26 June 1, 2016
      
 34,400     
      
      

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    

Price per

    

 

 

No. of Shares

 

Share

 

Vesting Period

 

59,000 

 

$

36.81 

 

ratably over 3 years

 

3,000 

 

$

38.43 

 

ratably over 3 years

 

15,000 

 

$

40.05 

 

ratably over 3 years

 

10,500 

 

$

40.05 

 

June 9, 2015

 

7,500 

 

$

41.34 

 

November 12, 2015

 

95,000 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 Also during the twelve months ended December 31, 2013, the vesting of 18,180 shares of restricted common stock were accelerated due to the retirement of our former Senior Vice President, Marketing and Strategic Planning.

Subsequent to December 31, 2014, we cancelled 640 shares of restricted stock and granted 59,00065,750 shares of restricted common stock at $36.81$44.45 per share. These shares vest ratably from the grant date over a three-year period fromperiod.

During 2014, we issued 15,000 options to purchase common stock at an exercise price of $38.43 per share. These stock options vest ratably over a three-year period. The fair value of these options was estimated utilizing the Black-Scholes-Merton valuation model and assumptions as of the grant date. DuringIn determining the year ended December 31, 2013,estimated fair value, the expected life assumption was three years, the volatility was 0.21, the risk free interest rate was 0.66% and the expected dividend yield was 5.31%. The fair value of the option granted was estimated to be $2.96. Also, during 2014, a total of 22,00045,000 stock options were exercised at a total option value of $0.5$1.1 million and a total market value on the date of exercise of $0.9$1.8 million. No stock options were granted during 2013 and allAt December 31, 2014, we have 43,334 stock options outstanding of which 28,334 of those stock options are vested as of December 31, 2013.exercisable.

Available Shelf Registration:

On July 19, 2013, we filed a Form S-3ASR "shelf"S‑3ASR “shelf” registration statement to replace our prior shelf registration statement. Our current shelf registration statement provides us with the capacity to offer up to $800.0 million in common stock, preferred stock, warrants, debt, depositary shares, or units. We may from time to time raise capital under our current shelf registration in amounts, at prices, and on terms to be announced when and if the securities are offered. The specifics of any future offerings, along with the use of proceeds of any securities offered, will be described in detail in a prospectus supplement, or other offering materials, at the time of the offering. At December 31, 2014, we had availability of $775.1 million under our effective shelf registration which expires on July 19, 2016.

46


Table of Contents

Commitments:

Commitments:

        As part of an acquisition in 2011, weWe committed to provide aup to $4.0 million of contingent paymentpayments, if certain operational thresholds were met.are met, to an operator under an amended master lease agreement, as previously discussed in Investing Activities. The contingent payment was recorded at fair value of $3.2 million, which was estimated using a discounted cash flow analysis, and we accretedwill accrete the contingent liabilityliabilities to the estimated settlement amount as of the estimated payment date. The fair value of such contingent liability was re-evaluatedwill be re‑evaluated on a quarterly basis based on changes in estimates of future operating results and changes in market discount rates. During 2013, we paid $7.0 million and2014, we recorded non-cashnon‑cash interest expense of $256,000$18,000 related to thethese contingent liability. Accordingly, we have no remaining contingent liability as ofliabilities. At December 31, 2013.2014, these earn-out liabilities had a fair value of $3.3 million.

        As of December 31, 2013, we have a commitment to provide, under certain conditions, up to $5.0 million per year through December 2014 to an existing operator for expansion of the 37 properties they lease from us. The estimated yield of this commitment is 9.5% plus the positive difference, if any, between the average yields on the U.S. Treasury 10-year note for the five days prior to funding, minus 420 basis points. As of December 31, 2013, no funds have been requested under this commitment. Excluding the $5.0 million per year commitment, the following table summarizes our investment


commitments as of December 31, 20132014 and year to date fundingamounts funded on our ongoingopen development redevelopment, renovationand improvement projects (excludes capitalized interest, dollar amounts in thousands):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

Number

    

Number

 

 

Investment

 

2014

 

Commitment

 

Remaining

 

of

 

of

 

Type of Property
 Investment
Commitment
 2013
Funding(2)
 Commitment
Funded
 Remaining
Commitment
 Number of
Properties
 Number of
Beds/Units
 

 

Commitment

 

Funding(2)

 

Funded

 

Commitment

 

Properties

 

Beds/Units

 

Skilled Nursing

 $29,650 $7,221 $12,757 $16,893 6 640 

 

$

2,200 

 

$

1,156 

 

$

2,161 

 

$

39 

 

 

141 

 

Assisted Living(1)

 50,656 9,614 10,661 39,995 7 385 

 

 

27,751 

 

 

8,831 

 

 

11,268 

 

 

16,483 

 

26 

 

1,194 

 

             

Totals

 $80,306 $16,835(3)$23,418 $56,888(3) 13 1,025 

 

$

29,951 

 

$

9,987 

(3)

$

13,429 

 

$

16,522 

(3)

28 

 

1,335 

 

             
             

(1)

Includes the development of a 66-unit memory care property for a commitment of $12,248, as previously discussed, a 60-unit memory care property for a total commitment of $10,703 and the improvement of 24 assisted living properties for a total investment commitment of $4,800.

(2)

Excludes funding for completed development and improvement projects discussed above and includes $1,400 of land acquired for the development of a 66-unit memory care property, as previously discussed, and the reclass of a pre‑development loan with a balance of $304, as previously discussed in Investing Activities.

(3)

Subsequent to December 31, 2014, we funded $731 under investment commitments. Accordingly, we have a remaining commitment of $15,791. Additionally, in January 2015, we amended an existing master lease with an operator to provide a commitment not to exceed $600 for the purpose of making capital improvements at a 196-skilled nursing property in Texas. Upon the capital improvement deadline of June 30, 2015 or final funding of the capital improvement commitment, the minimum rent will increase by the product of 9% and the total capital improvement funded.

(1)

IncludesSubsequent to December 31, 2014, we entered into a master lease agreement and committed to provide development commitments totaling $28.7 million. Under these development commitments, we purchased land and existing improvements for the developmentpurpose of threecompleting a 56-unit memory care propertiesproperty currently under construction for a total$7.2 million and land for the purpose of $30,256, onebuilding an 89-unit combination assisted living and memory care combination property for $2.5 million. The master lease also provides for the payment of two lease inducements of up to $4.0 million which will be amortized as a total of $5,800, andyield adjustment over the expansion of three assisted living properties for a total $14,600.
(2)
Excludes funding for completed construction projects shown above and $260 of capital improvement on three completed projects with no remaining commitments. It also includes $6 funded under the commitment as marketing expense, $3,475 of land acquired for development and the reclass of three pre-development loans with a total balance of $479.lease term. SeeInvesting Activitiesabove for further discussion on the pre-development loans.of these transactions.
(3)
Subsequent to December 31, 2013, we funded $8,828 under investment commitments. Accordingly, we have

Under a remaining commitment of $48,060.

        We committed to fund a $10.6 million mortgage and construction loan secured by an operational skilled nursing property and a vacant parcel of land upon which a 106-bed replacement facility will be constructed. Interest on the loan is paid monthly in arrears at a rate of 9.0% increasing 25 basis points annually. The term of the loan is 10 years. The agreement gives us the right to purchase the replacement facility for $13.5 million during an 18 month period beginning on the first anniversary of the issuance of the certificate of occupancy. If the purchase option is exercised, the replacement facility will be added to an existing master lease at a lease rate equivalent to the interest rate in effect on the loan at the time the purchase option is exercised. As of December 31, 2013,with Prestige, we funded $7.6 million of loan proceeds and we have a remaining commitment of $3.0 million on this mortgage and construction loan.

        We committed to provide a borrower an additional $12.0loan proceeds of up to $40.0 million, for capital improvementsunder certain conditions and underbased on certain operating metrics and valuation thresholds achieved and sustained within the firstinitial twelve years of the term,term. Since these conditions have not been met, no funding has been made under this $40.0 million additional proceedsloan commitment. We also committed to provide an additional $12.0 million for capital improvements under the Prestige mortgage loan. During 2014, we funded $3.4 million under this $12.0 million capital improvement commitment and had a remaining commitment to fund $8.7 million. Subsequent to December 31, 2014, we funded $0.8 million under this $12.0 million capital improvement commitment. Accordingly, we have a remaining commitment of $7.9 million.

Subsequent to December 31, 2014, we amended the Prestige mortgage loan to provide up to $40.0 million.an additional $20.0 million in loan proceeds for the redevelopment of two of the properties securing the loan (increasing the total capital improvement commitment to $32.0 million) and agreed to convey to the borrower two parcels of land held-for-use adjacent to these properties to facilitate the projects. As partial consideration for the increased commitment and associated conveyance, the borrower forfeited the option to prepay up to 50% of December 31, 2013, there has been no fundingthe then outstanding loan balance. As a

47


Table of Contents

result of the forfeiture of the prepayment option, the Company expects to record $1.3 million of effective interest during 2015. Additionally, in 2015, we originated an $11.0 million mortgage loan with Prestige and concurrently funded $9.5 million under eitherthis loan; with a commitment to fund the balance for approved capital improvement projects. The loan is secured by a 157-bed skilled nursing property in Michigan. See Investing Activities above for further discussion of these commitments. the mortgage loans with Prestige.

At December 31, 2013,2014, we had outstanding commitments of $2.4 million ineleven loans and line of credit agreements to certain operators. Aswith commitments totaling $3.8 million and a remaining commitment balance of December 31, 2013,$2.3 million. The weighted average interest rate of these loan is 11.4%. During 2014, we had funded $0.6received principal payments of $0.1 million and advanced principal of $1.3 million under these loan commitments. Subsequent to December 31, 2014, we advanced an additional $0.5 million of principal under these loan commitments and hadwe committed to fund a working capital loan of $0.5 million to an existing operator with interest at 6.5% maturing in February 2019. Accordingly, we have twelve loans and line of credit agreements with commitments totaling $4.3 million and a remaining commitment balance of $1.8$2.3 million. These loan commitments have interest rates ranging from 10.0% to 12.25% and maturities ranging from 2014 to 2017.

Contractual Obligations:

Contractual Obligations:

We monitor our contractual obligations and commitments detailed above to ensure funds are available to meet obligations when due. The following table represents our long-termlong‑term contractual obligations (scheduled principal payments and amounts due at maturity) as of December 31, 2013,2014, and excludes the effects of interest (in thousands):

 
 Total 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Thereafter 

Bank borrowings

 $21,000(1)$ $ $21,000 $ $ $ 

Senior unsecured notes

  255,800  4,167  29,166  26,667  26,167  28,167  141,466 

Bonds payable

  2,035  635  1,400         
                

 $278,835 $4,802 $30,566 $47,667 $26,167 $28,167 $141,466 
                
                

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    

Total

    

2015

    

2016

    

2017

    

2018

    

2019

    

Thereafter

 

Bank borrowings

 

$

 —

(1)

$

 —

 

$

 —

 

$

 —

 

$

 —

 

$

 —

 

$

 —

 

Senior unsecured notes

 

 

281,633 

 

 

29,166 

 

 

26,667 

 

 

26,167 

 

 

28,167 

 

 

25,666 

 

 

145,800 

 

 

 

$

281,633 

 

$

29,166 

 

$

26,667 

 

$

26,167 

 

$

28,167 

 

$

25,666 

 

$

145,800 

 


(1)

At December 31, 2014 we had $400,000 available for borrowing under our unsecured revolving line of credit. Subsequent to December 31, 2014, we borrowed $18,000. Accordingly, we had $18,000 outstanding and $382,000 available for borrowing.

(1)
At December 31, 2013 we had $219,000 available for borrowing under our unsecured revolving line of credit. Subsequent to December 31, 2013, we borrowed $11,500. Accordingly, we had $32,500 outstanding and $207,500 available for borrowing.

Assuming no additionalother borrowing under our unsecured revolving line of credit no change inexcept for the variable interest rate under our bond payable,$18.0 million borrowing subsequent December 31, 2014, and principal payments are paid as scheduled under our senior unsecured notes, and bond payables, the following table represents our projected interest expense, excluding capitalized interest, amortization of debt issue costs, bank fees and earn-out accretion, as of December 31, 20132014 (in thousands):

 
 Total 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Thereafter 

Bank borrowings

 $5,133 $2,124 $2,124 $885 $ $ $ 

Senior unsecured notes

  68,596  12,028  11,179  9,952  8,757  7,552  19,128 

Bonds payable

  60  41  19         
                

 $73,789 $14,193 $13,322 $10,837 $8,757 $7,552 $19,128 
                
                

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    

Total

    

2015

    

2016

    

2017

    

2018

    

2019

    

Thereafter

 

Bank borrowings

 

$

4,775 

 

$

1,261 

 

$

1,265 

 

$

1,261 

 

$

988 

 

$

 —

 

$

 —

 

Senior unsecured notes

 

 

69,505 

 

 

12,529 

 

 

11,302 

 

 

10,107 

 

 

8,902 

 

 

7,674 

 

 

18,991 

 

 

 

$

74,280 

 

$

13,790 

 

$

12,567 

 

$

11,368 

 

$

9,890 

 

$

7,674 

 

$

18,991 

 

Off-Balance

Off‑Balance Sheet Arrangements:

We had no off-balanceoff‑balance sheet arrangements as of December 31, 2013.2014.

Liquidity:

We have an Unsecured Credit Agreement in the amount of $240.0$400.0 million with the opportunity to increase the credit amount up to a total of $350.0$600.0 million. The Unsecured Credit Agreement provides a revolving line of credit with no scheduled maturities other than the maturity date of May 25, 2016.October 14, 2018. Based on our maximum total indebtedness to total asset value ratio at December 31, 2014 as calculated in the Unsecured Credit Agreement, our pricing under the Unsecured Credit Agreement is either Prime Rate plus 0.25%0.15% or LIBOR plus 1.25%1.15% depending on our borrowing election. At the time of borrowing, we may elect the 1, 2, 3 or 6 month LIBOR rate.

At December 31, 2013,2014, we had $6.8$25.2 million of cash on hand $219.0and $400.0 million available unsecured revolving

48


line of credit, and $30.0 million available under the uncommitted private shelf agreement.credit. Subsequent to December 31, 2013,2014, we borrowed $11.5$18.0 million and, therefore, have $207.5 million available under orour unsecured revolving line of credit. Accordingly, we have $18.0 million outstanding with $382.0 million available for borrowing. Also, we have $775.1 million available under our potential abilityeffective shelf registration to access the capital markets through the issuance of debt and/or equity securities under our $800.0 million effective shelf registration.securities. As a result, we believe our liquidity and various sources of available capital are sufficient to provide for payment of our current operating costs, debt obligations (both principal and interest), and capital commitments to our lessees and borrowers and to provide funds for distribution to the holders of our preferred stock and pay common dividends at least sufficient to maintain our REIT status. The timing, source and amount of cash flows provided by financing activities and used in investing activities are sensitive to the capital markets environment, especially to changes in interest rates.


Item 7A.  QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

You are cautioned that statements contained in this section are forward looking and should be read in conjunction with the disclosure under the heading "Cautionary Statements"“Cautionary Statements” and the "Risk Factors"“Risk Factors” set forth above.

We are exposed to market risks associated with changes in interest rates as they relate to our mortgage loans receivable and debt. Interest rate risk is sensitive to many factors, including governmental monetary and tax policies, domestic and international economic and political considerations and other factors that are beyond our control.

We do not utilize interest rate swaps, forward or option contracts or foreign currencies or commodities, or other types of derivative financial instruments nor do we engage in "off-balance sheet"“off‑balance sheet” transactions. The purpose of the following disclosure is to provide a framework to understand our sensitivity to hypothetical changes in interest rates as of December 31, 2013.2014.

Our future earnings, cash flows and estimated fair values relating to financial instruments are dependent upon prevalent market rates of interest, such as LIBOR or term rates of U.S. Treasury Notes. Changes in interest rates generally impact the fair value, but not future earnings or cash flows, of mortgage loans receivable and fixed rate debt. Our mortgage loans receivable and debt, such as our senior unsecured notes, are primarily fixed-ratefixed‑rate instruments. For variable rate debt, such as our revolving line of credit, changes in interest rates generally do not impact the fair value, but do affect future earnings and cash flows.

At December 31, 2013,2014, the fair value of our mortgage loans receivable using an 8.4%8.6% discount rate was approximately $200.2$199.0 million. A 1% increase in such rates would decrease the estimated fair value of our mortgage loans by approximately $16.5$16.4 million while a 1% decrease in such rates would increase their estimated fair value by approximately $19.6$19.3 million. At December 31, 2013,2014, the fair value of our senior unsecured notes using a 3.95%3.80% discount rate for those maturing before year 2020 and 4.25%4.55% discount rate for those maturing beyond year 2020 was approximately $262.4$283.9 million. A 1% increase in such rates would decrease the estimated fair value of our senior unsecured notes by approximately $12.3 million while a 1% decrease in such rates would increase their estimated fair value by approximately $13.1$13.2 million. These discount rates were measured based upon management'smanagement’s estimates of rates currently prevailing for comparable loans available to us and instruments of comparable maturities.

The estimated impact of changes in interest rates discussed above are determined by considering the impact of the hypothetical interest rates on our borrowing costs, lending rates and current U.S. Treasury rates from which our financial instruments may be priced. We do not believe that future market rate risks related to our financial instruments will be material to our financial position or results of operations. These analyses do not consider the effects of industry specific events, changes in the real estate markets, or other overall economic activities that could increase or decrease the fair value of our financial instruments. If such events or changes were to occur, we would consider taking actions to mitigate and/or reduce any negative exposure to such changes. However, due to the uncertainty of the specific actions that would be taken and their possible effects, the sensitivity analysis assumes no changes in our capital structure.


49


Item 8.  FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
STATEMENT
S


LTC Properties, Inc.

Index to Consolidated Financial Statements

and Financial Statement Schedules


Page

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

53

51

Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 20132014 and 20122013


54

52

Consolidated Statements of Income for the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 2012 and 20112012


55

53

Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income for the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 2012 and 20112012


56

54

Consolidated Statements of Equity for the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 2012 and 20112012


57

55

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 2012 and 20112012


58

56

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements


59

57

Consolidated Financial Statement Schedules


Schedule II—Valuation and Qualifying Accounts


86

84

Schedule III—Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation


87

85

Schedule IV—Mortgage Loans on Real Estate


92

90

Management Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting


95

93

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm


96

94


50


REPORT OF INDEPENDEN
REPORT OF INDEPENDENTT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of LTC Properties, Inc.

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of LTC Properties, Inc. (the "Company"“Company”) as of December 31, 20132014 and 2012,2013, and the related consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income, equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2013.2014. Our audits also included the financial statement schedules listed in the Index at Item 15. These financial statements and schedules are the responsibility of the Company'sCompany’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and schedules based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of LTC Properties, Inc. at December 31, 20132014 and 2012,2013, and the consolidated results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2013,2014, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. Also, in our opinion, the related financial statement schedules, when considered in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole, present fairly in all material respects, the information set forth therein.

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), LTC Properties, Inc.'s’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2013,2014, based on criteria established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (1992 framework) and our report dated February 20, 201426, 2015 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.

As discussed in Note 2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies to the consolidated financial statements, the Company changed its presentation of discontinued operations as a result of the early adoption of FASB Accounting Standard Update No. 2014-08 effective January 1, 2014.

/s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP

Los Angeles, California

February 20, 201426, 2015


51


Table of Contents


LTC PROPERTIES, INC.

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(In thousands)

 
 December 31,
2013
 December 31,
2012
 

ASSETS

       

Real estate investments:

       

Land

 $80,993 $74,702 

Buildings and improvements

  856,624  811,867 

Accumulated depreciation and amortization

  (218,700) (194,448)
      

Net operating real estate property

  718,917  692,121 

Properties held-for-sale, net of accumulated depreciation and amortization: 2013—$0; 2012—$4,100

    9,426 
      

Net real estate property

  718,917  701,547 

Mortgage loans receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts: 2013—$1,671; 2012—$782

  165,444  39,299 
      

Real estate investments, net

  884,361  740,846 

Other assets:

  
 
  
 
 

Cash and cash equivalents

  6,778  7,191 

Debt issue costs, net

  2,458  3,040 

Interest receivable

  702  789 

Straight-line rent receivable,(1) net of allowance for doubtful accounts: 2013—$1,541; 2012—$1,513

  29,760  26,766 

Prepaid expenses and other assets

  6,756  7,542 

Notes receivable

  595  3,180 

Straight-line rent receivable and other assets related to properties held-for-sale, net of allowance for doubtful accounts: 2013—$0; 2012—$44

    238 
      

Total assets

 $931,410 $789,592 
      
      

LIABILITIES

       

Bank borrowings

 $21,000 $115,500 

Senior unsecured notes

  255,800  185,800 

Bonds payable

  2,035  2,635 

Accrued interest

  3,424  3,279 

Earn-out liabilities

    6,744 

Accrued expenses and other liabilities

  16,713  12,165 

Accrued expenses and other liabilities related to properties held-for-sale

    361 
      

Total liabilities

  298,972  326,484 

EQUITY

  
 
  
 
 

Stockholders' equity:

       

Preferred stock $0.01 par value; 15,000 shares authorized; shares issued and outstanding: 2013—2,000; 2012—2,000

  38,500  38,500 

Common stock: $0.01 par value; 60,000 shares authorized; shares issued and outstanding: 2013—34,746; 2012—30,544

  347  305 

Capital in excess of par value

  688,654  510,236 

Cumulative net income

  781,848  724,033 

Accumulated other comprehensive income

  117  152 

Cumulative distributions

  (877,028) (810,125)
      

Total LTC Properties, Inc. stockholders' equity

  632,438  463,101 

Non-controlling interests

  
  
7
 
      

Total equity

  632,438  463,108 
      

Total liabilities and equity

 $931,410 $789,592 
      
      

(1)
On December 31, 2013 and 2012, we had $3,213 and $3,191 respectively, in straight-line rent receivable from a lessee that qualifies as a related party because the lessee's former Chief Executive Officer is on our Board of Directors. SeeNote 12. Transactions with Related Party for further discussion.

See accompanying notes.



LTC PROPERTIES, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME

(In thousands, except per share amounts)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    

December 31,

 

 

 

2014

 

2013

 

ASSETS

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Real estate investments:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Land

 

$

80,024 

 

$

80,993 

 

Buildings and improvements

 

 

869,814 

 

 

856,624 

 

Accumulated depreciation and amortization

 

 

(223,315)

 

 

(218,700)

 

Net operating real estate property

 

 

726,523 

 

 

718,917 

 

Mortgage loans receivable, net of loan loss reserve: 2014—$1,673; 2013—$1,671

 

 

165,656 

 

 

165,444 

 

Real estate investments, net

 

 

892,179 

 

 

884,361 

 

Other assets:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash and cash equivalents

 

 

25,237 

 

 

6,778 

 

Debt issue costs, net

 

 

3,782 

 

 

2,458 

 

Interest receivable

 

 

597 

 

 

702 

 

Straight-line rent receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts: 2014—$731; 2013—$1,541

 

 

32,651 

 

 

29,760 

 

Prepaid expenses and other assets

 

 

9,931 

 

 

6,756 

 

Notes receivable

 

 

1,442 

 

 

595 

 

Total assets

 

$

965,819 

 

$

931,410 

 

LIABILITIES

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Bank borrowings

 

$

 —

 

$

21,000 

 

Senior unsecured notes

 

 

281,633 

 

 

255,800 

 

Bonds payable

 

 

 —

 

 

2,035 

 

Accrued interest

 

 

3,556 

 

 

3,424 

 

Earn-out liabilities

 

 

3,258 

 

 

 

Accrued expenses and other liabilities

 

 

17,251 

 

 

16,713 

 

Total liabilities

 

 

305,698 

 

 

298,972 

 

EQUITY

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Stockholders’ equity:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Preferred stock $0.01 par value; 15,000 shares authorized; shares issued and outstanding: 2014—2,000; 2013—2,000

 

 

38,500 

 

 

38,500 

 

Common stock: $0.01 par value; 60,000 shares authorized; shares issued and outstanding: 2014—35,480; 2013—34,746

 

 

355 

 

 

347 

 

Capital in excess of par value

 

 

717,396 

 

 

688,654 

 

Cumulative net income

 

 

855,247 

 

 

781,848 

 

Accumulated other comprehensive income

 

 

82 

 

 

117 

 

Cumulative distributions

 

 

(951,459)

 

 

(877,028)

 

Total equity

 

 

660,121 

 

 

632,438 

 

Total liabilities and equity

 

$

965,819 

 

$

931,410 

 

See accompanying notes.

52


 
 Years ended December 31, 
 
 2013 2012 2011 

Revenues:

          

Rental income(1)

 $98,166 $86,022 $76,096 

Interest income from mortgage loans

  6,298  5,496  6,411 

Interest and other income(2)

  510  964  1,111 
        

Total revenues

  104,974  92,482  83,618 
        

Expenses:

          

Interest expense

  11,364  9,932  6,434 

Depreciation and amortization

  24,389  21,613  18,911 

Provision (recovery) for doubtful accounts

  2,180  (101) (13)

General and administrative expenses

  11,636  10,732  9,666 
        

Total expenses

  49,569  42,176  34,998 
        

Income from continuing operations

  55,405  50,306  48,620 

Discontinued operations:

          

Income from discontinued operations

  805  1,005  823 

Gain on sale of assets, net

  1,605  16   
        

Net income (loss) from discontinued operations

  2,410  1,021  823 
        

Net income

  57,815  51,327  49,443 

Income allocated to non-controlling interests

    (37) (191)
        

Net income attributable to LTC Properties, Inc. 

  57,815  51,290  49,252 
        

Income allocated to participating securities

  (383) (377) (342)

Income allocated to preferred stockholders

  (3,273) (3,273) (9,078)
        

Net income available to common stockholders

 $54,159 $47,640 $39,832 
        
        

Basic earnings per common share:

          

Continuing operations

 $1.56 $1.54 $1.34 

Discontinued operations

 $0.07 $0.03 $0.03 
        

Net income available to common stockholders

 $1.64 $1.58 $1.36 
        
        

Diluted earnings per common share:

          

Continuing operations

 $1.56 $1.54 $1.33 

Discontinued operations

 $0.07 $0.03 $0.02 
        

Net income available to common stockholders

 $1.63 $1.57 $1.36 
        
        

Weighted average shares used to calculate earnings per common share:

          

Basic

  33,111  30,238  29,194 

Diluted

  33,142  30,278  29,222 

(1)
During 2013, 2012 and 2011, we received $4,479, $4,370, and $4,264, respectively, in rental income and recorded $22, $131 and $238, respectively, in straight-line rental income from a lessee that qualifies as a related party because the lessee's former Chief Executive Officer is on our Board

Table of Directors. SeeContents

LTC PROPERTIES, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOMENote 12. Transactions with Related Party for further discussion.

(2)
During 2013, we did not recognize any interest income from related parties. During 2012 and 2011 we recognized $235, and $721, respectively, of interest income from an entity that qualifies as a related party because the entity's former Chief Executive Officer is on our Board of Directors. SeeNote 12. Transactions with Related Party for further discussion.

(In thousands, except per share amounts)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

 

 

2014

 

2013

 

2012

 

Revenues:

    

 

 

    

 

    

    

 

 

 

Rental income

 

$

101,849 

 

$

98,166 

 

$

86,022 

 

Interest income from mortgage loans

 

 

16,553 

 

 

6,298 

 

 

5,496 

 

Interest and other income

 

 

559 

 

 

510 

 

 

964 

 

Total revenues

 

 

118,961 

 

 

104,974 

 

 

92,482 

 

Expenses:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interest expense

 

 

13,128 

 

 

11,364 

 

 

9,932 

 

Depreciation and amortization

 

 

25,529 

 

 

24,389 

 

 

21,613 

 

Provision (recovery) for doubtful accounts

 

 

32 

 

 

2,180 

 

 

(101)

 

General and administrative expenses

 

 

11,832 

 

 

11,636 

 

 

10,732 

 

Total expenses

 

 

50,521 

 

 

49,569 

 

 

42,176 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Operating income

 

 

68,440 

 

 

55,405 

 

 

50,306 

 

Gain on sale of  real estate, net

 

 

4,959 

 

 

— 

 

 

— 

 

Income from continuing operations

 

 

73,399 

 

 

55,405 

 

 

50,306 

 

Discontinued operations:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Income from discontinued operations

 

 

— 

 

 

805 

 

 

1,005 

 

Gain on sale of assets, net

 

 

— 

 

 

1,605 

 

 

16 

 

Net income from discontinued operations

 

 

— 

 

 

2,410 

 

 

1,021 

 

Net income

 

 

73,399 

 

 

57,815 

 

 

51,327 

 

Income allocated to non-controlling interests

 

 

— 

 

 

— 

 

 

(37)

 

Net income attributable to LTC Properties, Inc.

 

 

73,399 

 

 

57,815 

 

 

51,290 

 

Income allocated to participating securities

 

 

(481)

 

 

(383)

 

 

(377)

 

Income allocated to preferred stockholders

 

 

(3,273)

 

 

(3,273)

 

 

(3,273)

 

Net income available to common stockholders

 

$

69,645 

 

$

54,159 

 

$

47,640 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Basic earnings per common share:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Continuing operations

 

$

2.01 

 

$

1.56 

 

$

1.54 

 

Discontinued operations

 

$

— 

 

$

0.07 

 

$

0.03 

 

Net income available to common stockholders

 

$

2.01 

 

$

1.64 

 

$

1.58 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Diluted earnings per common share:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Continuing operations

 

$

1.99 

 

$

1.56 

 

$

1.54 

 

Discontinued operations

 

$

— 

 

$

0.07 

 

$

0.03 

 

Net income available to common stockholders

 

$

1.99 

 

$

1.63 

 

$

1.57 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Weighted average shares used to calculate earnings per common share:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Basic

 

 

34,617 

 

 

33,111 

 

 

30,238 

 

Diluted

 

 

36,640 

 

 

33,142 

 

 

30,278 

 

NOTE: Computations of per share amounts from continuing operations, discontinued operations and net income are made independently. Therefore, the sum of per share amounts from continuing operations and discontinued operations may not agree with the per share amounts from net income available to common stockholders.

See accompanying notes.


notes.

53


LTC PROPERTIES, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME

(In thousands, except per share amounts)

 
 Years ended December 31, 
 
 2013 2012 2011 

Net income

 $57,815 $51,327 $49,443 

Reclassification adjustment

  (35) (47) (65)
        

Comprehensive income

  57,780  51,280  49,378 

Comprehensive income allocated to non-controlling interests

    (37) (191)
        

Comprehensive income attributable to LTC Properties, Inc. 

 $57,780 $51,243 $49,187 
        
        

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

 

 

2014

 

2013

 

2012

 

Net income

    

$

73,399 

    

$

57,815 

    

$

51,327 

 

Reclassification adjustment (Note 10)

 

 

(35)

 

 

(35)

 

 

(47)

 

Comprehensive income

 

 

73,364 

 

 

57,780 

 

 

51,280 

 

Comprehensive income allocated to non-controlling interests

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

(37)

 

Comprehensive income attributable to LTC Properties, Inc.

 

$

73,364 

 

$

57,780 

 

$

51,243 

 

See accompanying notes.


notes.

54


LTC PROPERTIES, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF EQUITY

(In thousands)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


 Shares  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
 

 

Shares

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Capital in

 

Cumulative

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total

 

Non-

 

 

 

 


 Preferred
Stock
 Common
Stock
 Preferred
Stock
 Common
Stock
 Capital in
Excess of
Par Value
 Cumulative
Net
Income
 Accumulated
OCI
 Cumulative
Distributions
 Total
Stockholders'
Equity
 Non-
controlling
Interests
 Total
Equity
 

 

Preferred

 

Common

 

Preferred

 

Common

 

Excess of

 

Net

 

Accumulated

 

Cumulative

 

Stockholders’

 

controlling

 

Total

 

Balance—December 31, 2010

 5,536 26,345 $126,913 $263 $398,599 $623,491 $264 $(693,970)$455,560 $1,962 $457,522 

8.0% Series F Preferred Stock full redemption

 
(3,536

)
 
 
(88,413

)
 
 
3,566
 
 
 
(3,566

)
 
(88,413

)
 
 
(88,413

)

Reclassification adjustment

       (65)  (65)  (65)

Stock option exercises

  5   120    120  120 

Issue common stock

  3,990  40 103,591    103,631  103,631 

Issue restricted stock

  6          

Net income

      49,252   49,252 191 49,443 

Vested stock options

     17    17  17 

Vested restricted stock

     1,450    1,450  1,450 

Non-controlling interests preferred return

          (191) (191)

Preferred stock dividends

        (5,512) (5,512)  (5,512)

Common stock cash distributions ($1.68 per share)

        (49,292) (49,292)  (49,292)
                       

 

Stock

 

Stock

 

Stock

 

Stock

 

Par Value

 

Income

 

OCI

 

Distributions

 

Equity

 

Interests

 

Equity

 

Balance—December 31, 2011

 2,000 30,346 38,500 303 507,343 672,743 199 (752,340) 466,748 1,962 468,710 

    

2,000 

    

30,346 

    

$

38,500 

    

$

303 

    

$

507,343 

    

$

672,743 

    

$

199 

    

$

(752,340)

    

$

466,748 

    

$

1,962 

    

$

468,710 

 

                       

Reclassification adjustment

       (47)  (47)  (47)

 

 —

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

(47)

 

 

 —

 

 

(47)

 

 

 —

 

 

(47)

 

Stock option exercises

  85  1 1,925    1,926  1,926 

 

 —

 

85 

 

 

 —

 

 

 

 

1,925 

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

1,926 

 

 

 —

 

 

1,926 

 

Issue restricted stock

  90  1 (1)       

 

 —

 

90 

 

 

 —

 

 

 

 

(1)

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

Net income

      51,290   51,290 37 51,327 

 

 —

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

51,290 

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

51,290 

 

 

37 

 

 

51,327 

 

Vested stock options

     10    10  10 

 

 —

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

10 

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

10 

 

 

 —

 

 

10 

 

Vested restricted stock

     1,809    1,809  1,809 

 

 —

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

1,809 

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

1,809 

 

 

 —

 

 

1,809 

 

Non-controlling interests conversion

  23   (850)    (850) (1,914) (2,764)

 

 —

 

23 

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

(850)

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

(850)

 

 

(1,914)

 

 

(2,764)

 

Non-controlling interests preferred return

          (78) (78)

 

 —

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

(78)

 

 

(78)

 

Preferred stock dividends

        (3,273) (3,273)  (3,273)

 

 —

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

(3,273)

 

 

(3,273)

 

 

 —

 

 

(3,273)

 

Common stock cash distributions ($1.79 per share)

        (54,512) (54,512)  (54,512)

 

 —

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

(54,512)

 

 

(54,512)

 

 

 —

 

 

(54,512)

 

                       

Balance—December 31, 2012

 2,000 30,544 38,500 305 510,236 724,033 152 (810,125) 463,101 7 463,108 

 

2,000 

 

30,544 

 

 

38,500 

 

 

305 

 

 

510,236 

 

 

724,033 

 

 

152 

 

 

(810,125)

 

 

463,101 

 

 

 

 

463,108 

 

                       

Reclassification adjustment

       (35)  (35)  (35)

 

 —

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

(35)

 

 

 —

 

 

(35)

 

 

 —

 

 

(35)

 

Issuance of common stock

  4,152  42 175,556    175,598  175,598 

 

 —

 

4,152 

 

 

 —

 

 

42 

 

 

175,556 

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

175,598 

 

 

 —

 

 

175,598 

 

Issued restricted stock

  35          

Issue restricted stock

 

 —

 

35 

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

Net income

      57,815   57,815  57,815 

 

 —

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

57,815 

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

57,815 

 

 

 —

 

 

57,815 

 

Vested restricted stock

     2,591    2,591  2,591 

 

 —

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

2,591 

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

2,591 

 

 

 —

 

 

2,591 

 

Stock option exercises

  22   523    523  523 

 

 —

 

22 

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

523 

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

523 

 

 

 —

 

 

523 

 

Non-controlling interests preferred return

          (7) (7)

 

 —

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

(7)

 

 

(7)

 

Preferred stock dividends

        (3,272) (3,272)  (3,272)

 

 —

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

(3,272)

 

 

(3,272)

 

 

 —

 

 

(3,272)

 

Common stock cash distributions ($1.91 per share)

        (63,631) (63,631)  (63,631)

 

 —

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

(63,631)

 

 

(63,631)

 

 

 —

 

 

(63,631)

 

Other

  (7)   (252)    (252)  (252)

 

 —

 

(7)

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

(252)

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

(252)

 

 

 —

 

 

(252)

 

                       

Balance—December 31, 2013

 2,000 34,746 $38,500 $347 $688,654 $781,848 $117 $(877,028)$632,438 $ $632,438 

 

2,000 

 

34,746 

 

 

38,500 

 

 

347 

 

 

688,654 

 

 

781,848 

 

 

117 

 

 

(877,028)

 

 

632,438 

 

 

 —

 

 

632,438 

 

                       
                       

Reclassification adjustment

 

 —

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

(35)

 

 

 —

 

 

(35)

 

 

 —

 

 

(35)

 

Issuance of common stock

 

 —

 

600 

 

 

 —

 

 

 

 

24,638 

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

24,644 

 

 

 —

 

 

24,644 

 

Issue restricted stock

 

 —

 

95 

 

 

 —

 

 

 

 

(1)

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

Net income

 

 —

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

73,399 

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

73,399 

 

 

 —

 

 

73,399 

 

Vested restricted stock

 

 —

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

3,241 

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

3,241 

 

 

 —

 

 

3,241 

 

Vested stock options

 

 —

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

12 

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

12 

 

 

 —

 

 

12 

 

Stock option exercises

 

 —

 

45 

 

 

 —

 

 

 

 

1,070 

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

1,071 

 

 

 —

 

 

1,071 

 

Non-controlling interests preferred return

 

 —

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

Preferred stock dividends

 

 —

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

(3,273)

 

 

(3,273)

 

 

 —

 

 

(3,273)

 

Common stock cash distributions ($2.04 per share)

 

 —

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

(71,158)

 

 

(71,158)

 

 

 —

 

 

(71,158)

 

Other

 

 —

 

(6)

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

(218)

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

(218)

 

 

 —

 

 

(218)

 

Balance—December 31, 2014

 

2,000 

 

35,480 

 

$

38,500 

 

$

355 

 

$

717,396 

 

$

855,247 

 

$

82 

 

$

(951,459)

 

$

660,121 

 

$

 —

 

$

660,121 

 

See accompanying notes.


notes.

55


LTC PROPERTIES, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(In thousands)

 
 Year ended December 31, 
 
 2013 2012 2011 

OPERATING ACTIVITIES:

          

Net income

 $57,815 $51,327 $49,443 

Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:

          

Depreciation and amortization—continuing and discontinued operations

  24,706  22,153  19,623 

Stock-based compensation expense

  2,591  1,819  1,467 

Gain on sale of assets, net

  (1,605) (16)  

Straight-line rental income—continuing and discontinued operations(1)

  (3,955) (3,264) (3,728)

Provision (recovery) for doubtful accounts

  2,180  (101) (13)

Non-cash interest related to earn-out liabilities

  256  439  464 

Capitalized interest

  (932) (130) (45)

Other non-cash items, net

  1,441  1,460  1,344 

Decrease in interest receivable

  32  535  56 

Increase in accrued interest payable

  145  1,923  681 

Net change in other assets and liabilities

  3,519  545  1,167 
        

Net cash provided by operating activities

  86,193  76,690  70,459 
        

INVESTING ACTIVITIES:

          

Investment in real estate properties, net

  (19,040) (166,750) (96,294)

Investment in real estate developments, net

  (23,605) (9,957) (50)

Investment in real estate capital improvements, net

  (6,992) (1,132) (3,135)

Proceeds from sale of real estate investments, net

  11,001  1,271   

Investment in real estate mortgages

  (129,358) (7,719)  

Principal payments received on mortgage loans receivable

  1,933  21,633  5,967 

Proceeds from redemption of marketable securities

    6,500   

Advances under notes receivable

  (1,004) (2,930) (232)

Principal payments received on notes receivable

  3,110  569  731 
        

Net cash used in investing activities

  (163,955) (158,515) (93,013)
        

FINANCING ACTIVITIES:

          

Bank borrowings

  93,000  153,500  167,600 

Repayment of bank borrowings

  (187,500) (94,000) (149,300)

Proceeds from issuance of senior unsecured notes

  70,000  85,800  50,000 

Principal payments on mortgage loan payable and bonds payable

  (600) (565) (530)

Payment of earn-out liabilities

  (7,000)   (4,000)

Proceeds from common stock offering

  176,260    103,631 

Stock option exercises

  523  1,926  120 

Distributions paid to stockholders

  (66,904) (57,785) (56,572)

Redemption of preferred stock

      (88,413)

Redemption of non-controlling interests

    (2,764)  

Distributions paid to non-controlling interests

  (7) (78) (191)

Financing costs paid

  (171) (1,426) (2,286)

Other

  (252)    
        

Net cash provided by financing activities

  77,349  84,608  20,059 
        

(Decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents

  (413) 2,783  (2,495)

Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of year

  7,191  4,408  6,903 
        

Cash and cash equivalents, end of year

 $6,778 $7,191 $4,408 
        
        

Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information:

          

Interest paid

 $11,398 $7,452 $5,070 

Non-cash investing and financing transactions:

          

SeeNote 4: Supplemental Cash Flow Information for further discussion.

          

(1)
During 2013, 2012 and 2011, we recorded $22, $131, and $238, respectively, in straight-line rental income from a lessee that qualifies as a related party because the lessee's former Chief Executive Officer is on our Board of Directors. SeeNote 12. Transactions with Related Party for further discussion.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

 

 

2014

 

2013

 

2012

 

OPERATING ACTIVITIES:

    

 

    

    

 

    

    

 

    

 

Net income

 

$

73,399 

 

$

57,815 

 

$

51,327 

 

Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Depreciation and amortization—continuing and discontinued operations

 

 

25,529 

 

 

24,706 

 

 

22,153 

 

Stock-based compensation expense

 

 

3,253 

 

 

2,591 

 

 

1,819 

 

Gain on sale of assets, net

 

 

(4,959)

 

 

(1,605)

 

 

(16)

 

Straight-line rental income—continuing and discontinued operations

 

 

(3,002)

 

 

(3,955)

 

 

(3,264)

 

Provision (recovery) for doubtful accounts

 

 

32 

 

 

2,180 

 

 

(101)

 

Non-cash interest related to earn-out liabilities

 

 

18 

 

 

256 

 

 

439 

 

Other non-cash items, net

 

 

1,653 

 

 

1,441 

 

 

1,460 

 

Decrease in interest receivable

 

 

72 

 

 

32 

 

 

535 

 

Increase in accrued interest payable

 

 

132 

 

 

145 

 

 

1,923 

 

Net change in other assets and liabilities

 

 

(365)

 

 

3,519 

 

 

545 

 

Net cash provided by operating activities

 

 

95,762 

 

 

87,125 

 

 

76,820 

 

INVESTING ACTIVITIES:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Investment in real estate properties, net

 

 

(11,650)

 

 

(19,040)

 

 

(166,750)

 

Investment in real estate developments, net

 

 

(34,135)

 

 

(23,605)

 

 

(9,957)

 

Investment in real estate capital improvements, net

 

 

(13,967)

 

 

(6,992)

 

 

(1,132)

 

Capitalized interest

 

 

(1,506)

 

 

(932)

 

 

(130)

 

Proceeds from sale of real estate investments, net

 

 

33,593 

 

 

11,001 

 

 

1,271 

 

Investment in real estate mortgages

 

 

(9,374)

 

 

(129,358)

 

 

(7,719)

 

Principal payments received on mortgage loans receivable

 

 

9,155 

 

 

1,933 

 

 

21,633 

 

Proceeds from redemption of marketable securities

 

 

 —

 

 

 

 

6,500 

 

Advances under notes receivable

 

 

(1,263)

 

 

(1,004)

 

 

(2,930)

 

Principal payments received on notes receivable

 

 

113 

 

 

3,110 

 

 

569 

 

Net cash used in investing activities

 

 

(29,034)

 

 

(164,887)

 

 

(158,645)

 

FINANCING ACTIVITIES:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Bank borrowings

 

 

37,500 

 

 

93,000 

 

 

153,500 

 

Repayment of bank borrowings

 

 

(58,500)

 

 

(187,500)

 

 

(94,000)

 

Proceeds from issuance of senior unsecured notes

 

 

30,000 

 

 

70,000 

 

 

85,800 

 

Principal payments on senior unsecured notes

 

 

(4,167)

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

Principal payments on mortgage loan payable and bonds payable

 

 

(2,035)

 

 

(600)

 

 

(565)

 

Payment of earn-out liabilities

 

 

 —

 

 

(7,000)

 

 

 

Proceeds from common stock offering

 

 

24,644 

 

 

176,260 

 

 

 

Stock option exercises

 

 

1,071 

 

 

523 

 

 

1,926 

 

Distributions paid to stockholders

 

 

(74,431)

 

 

(66,904)

 

 

(57,785)

 

Redemption of non-controlling interests

 

 

 —

 

 

 

 

(2,764)

 

Distributions paid to non-controlling interests

 

 

 —

 

 

(7)

 

 

(78)

 

Financing costs paid

 

 

(2,132)

 

 

(171)

 

 

(1,426)

 

Other

 

 

(219)

 

 

(252)

 

 

 

Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities

 

 

(48,269)

 

 

77,349 

 

 

84,608 

 

Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents

 

 

18,459 

 

 

(413)

 

 

2,783 

 

Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of year

 

 

6,778 

 

 

7,191 

 

 

4,408 

 

Cash and cash equivalents, end of year

 

$

25,237 

 

$

6,778 

 

$

7,191 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interest paid

 

$

13,694 

 

$

11,398 

 

$

7,452 

 

Non-cash investing and financing transactions:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

See Note 4: Supplemental Cash Flow Information for further discussion.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

See accompanying notes.


notes.

56


Table of Contents

LTC PROPERTIES, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

1. The Company

LTC Properties, Inc. (or LTC), a Maryland corporation, commenced operations on August 25, 1992. LTC is a real estate investment trust (or REIT) that invests primarily in senior housing and long term care properties through property lease transactions, mortgage loans and other investments.

2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Basis of Presentation.  The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the accounts of LTC, our wholly-ownedwholly‑owned subsidiaries and our controlled partnership, prior to its liquidation in 2013. All intercompany investments, accounts and transactions have been eliminated. Control over the partnership was based on the provisions of the partnership agreement that provided us with a controlling financial interest in the partnership. Under the terms of the partnership agreement, we, as the general partner, were responsible for the management of the partnership'spartnership’s assets, business and affairs. Our rights and duties in management of the partnership included making all operating decisions, setting the capital budget, executing all contracts, making all employment decisions, and handling the purchase and disposition of assets, among others. We, as the general partner, were responsible for the ongoing, major, and central operations of the partnership and made all management decisions. In addition, we, as the general partner, assumed the risk for all operating losses, capital losses, and were entitled to substantially all capital gains (appreciation).

The Financial Accounting Standard Board (or FASB) created a framework for evaluating whether a general partner or a group of general partners controls a limited partnership or a managing member or a group of managing members controls a limited liability company and therefore should consolidate the entity. The guidance states that the presumption of general partner or managing member control would be overcome only when the limited partners or non-managingnon‑managing members have certain specific rights as described in the guidance. The limited partners had virtually no rights and were precluded from taking part in the operation, management or control of the partnership. The limited partners were also precluded from transferring their partnership interests without the expressed permission of the general partner. However, we could transfer our interest without consultation or permission of the limited partners. We consolidated the partnership in accordance with the guidance.

The FASB requires the classification of non-controllingnon‑controlling interests as a component of consolidated equity in the consolidated balance sheet subject to the provisions of the rules governing classification and measurement of redeemable securities. The guidance requires consolidated net income to be reported at the amounts attributable to both the controlling and non-controllingnon‑ controlling interests. The calculation of earnings per share will be based on income amounts attributable to the controlling interest. Also, this guidance addresses accounting and reporting for a change in control of a subsidiary.

        Certain reclassifications have been made to the prior period consolidated financial statements to conform to the current period presentation, including changes as a result of the application of accounting guidance for properties disposed or classified as held-for-sale. During the year ended December 31, 2013, we sold a 47-bed skilled nursing property located in Colorado for $1,000. Additionally, we sold six skilled nursing properties with a total of 230 beds for $11,000,000. During the year ended December 31, 2012, we sold a 140-bed skilled nursing property located in Texas for $1,248,000 and we also reclassified a 140-unit independent living property located in Texas from held-for-sale to held-for-use. Depreciation expense, which was not recognized during the held-for-sale period, was recognized at the date of reclassification. Due to the market conditions, the timing of the ultimate disposal of this property is uncertain. These adjustments are normal and recurring in nature. SeeNote 6. Real Estate Investments for further discussion of our property sales.



LTC PROPERTIES, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

The FASB addresses when a company should include in its financial statements the assets, liabilities and activities of another entity. The guidance requires that we consolidate a "variable“variable interest entity"entity” if we are determined to be the primary beneficiary of the equity. The guidance also requires disclosure about "variable“variable interest entities"entities” that we are not required to consolidate but in which we have a significant variable interest. We believe that as of December 31, 2013,2014, we do not have investments in any entities that meet the definition of a "variable“variable interest entity."

Use of Estimates.  Preparation of the consolidated financial statements in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (or GAAP) requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Cash Equivalents.  Cash equivalents consist of highly liquid investments with a maturity of three months or less when purchased and are stated at cost which approximates market.

57


Table of Contents

LTC PROPERTIES, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

Owned Properties.  We make estimates as part of our allocation of the purchase price of acquisitions to the various components of the acquisition based upon the relative fair value of each component. In determining fair value, we use current appraisals or other third party opinions of value. The most significant components of our allocations are typically the allocation of fair value to land and buildings and, for certain of our acquisitions, in-placein‑place leases and other intangible assets. In the case of the fair value of buildings and the allocation of value to land and other intangibles, the estimates of the values of these components will affect the amount of depreciation and amortization we record over the estimated useful life of the property acquired or the remaining lease term. In the case of the value of in-placein‑place leases, the appraiserswe make best estimates based on the evaluation of the specific characteristics of each tenant'stenant’s lease. Factors considered include estimates of carrying costs during hypothetical expected lease-uplease‑up periods, market conditions and costs to execute similar leases. These assumptions affect the amount of future revenue that we will recognize over the remaining lease term for the acquired in-placein‑place leases. We evaluate each purchase transaction to determine whether the acquired assets meet the definition of a business. Transaction costs related to acquisitions that are not deemed to be businesses are included in the cost basis of the acquired assets, while transaction costs related to acquisitions that are deemed to be businesses are expensed as incurred.

We capitalize direct construction and development costs, including predevelopment costs, interest, property taxes, insurance and other costs directly related and essential to the acquisition, development or construction of a real estate asset. We capitalize construction and development costs while substantive activities are ongoing to prepare an asset for its intended use. We consider a construction project as substantially complete and held available for occupancy upon the issuance of the certificate of occupancy. Costs incurred after a project is substantially complete and ready for its intended use, or after development activities have ceased, are expensed as incurred. For redevelopment, renovation and expansion of existing operating properties, we capitalize the cost for the construction and improvement incurred in connection with the redevelopment, renovation and expansion. Costs previously capitalized related to abandoned acquisitions or developments are charged to earnings. Expenditures for repairs and maintenance are expensed as incurred.

Depreciation is computed principally by the straight-linestraight‑line method for financial reporting purposes over the estimated useful lives of the assets, which range from 3 to 5 years for computers, 5 to 15 years for furniture and equipment, 35 to 45 years for buildings, 10 to 20 years for building improvements and the respective lease term for acquired lease intangibles.



LTC PROPERTIES, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

Mortgage Loans Receivable.  Mortgage loans receivable we originate are recorded on an amortized cost basis. Mortgage loans we acquire are recorded at fair value at the time of purchase net of any related premium or discount which is amortized as a yield adjustment to interest income over the life of the loan.

Allowance for Doubtful Accounts.  We maintain an allowance for doubtful accounts. The allowance for doubtful accounts is based upon the expected collectability of our receivables and is maintained at a level believed adequate to absorb potential losses in our receivables. In determining the allowance we perform a quarterly evaluation of all receivables. If this evaluation indicates that there is a greater risk of receivable charge-offs,charge‑offs, additional allowances are recorded in current period earnings. During the fourth quarter of 2013, we wrote-offwrote‑off an $878,000 straight-linestraight‑line rent receivable balance related to the transition of four assisted living properties to a new lessee.

Impairments.  Assets that are classified as held for use are periodically evaluated for impairment when events or changes in circumstances indicate that the asset may be impaired or the carrying amount of the asset may not be recoverable through future undiscounted cash flows. Management assesses the impairment of properties individually and impairment losses are calculated as the excess of the carrying amount over the estimated fair value of assets as of the measurement date. In determining fair value, we use current appraisals or other third party opinions of value and other estimates of fair value such as estimated discounted future cash flows.

58


Table of Contents

LTC PROPERTIES, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

Also, we evaluate the carrying values of mortgage loans receivable on an individual basis. Management periodically evaluates the realizability of future cash flows from the mortgage loan receivable when events or circumstances, such as the non-receiptnon‑receipt of principal and interest payments and/or significant deterioration of the financial condition of the borrower, indicate that the carrying amount of the mortgage loan receivable may not be recoverable. An impairment charge is recognized in current period earnings and is calculated as the difference between the carrying amount of the mortgage loan receivable and the discounted cash flows expected to be received, or if foreclosure is probable, the fair value of the collateral securing the mortgage.

Fair Value of Financial Instruments.  The FASB requires the disclosure of fair value information about financial instruments for which it is practicable to estimate that value. In cases where quoted market prices are not available, fair values are based on estimates using present value or other valuation techniques. Those techniques are significantly affected by the assumptions used, including the discount rate and estimates of future cash flows. In that regard, the derived fair value estimates cannot be substantiated by comparison to independent markets and, in many cases, could not be realized in immediate settlement of the instrument. Accordingly, the aggregate fair market value amounts presented in the notes to these consolidated financial statements do not represent our underlying carrying value in financial instruments.

The FASB provides guidance for using fair value to measure assets and liabilities, the information used to measure fair value, and the effect of fair value measurements on earnings. The FASB emphasizes that fair value is a market-basedmarket‑ based measurement, not an entity-specificentity‑specific measurement. Therefore, a fair value measurement should be determined based on the assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability. As a basis for considering market participant assumptions in fair value measurements, the FASB establishes a fair value hierarchy that distinguishes between market participant assumptions based on market data obtained from sources independent of the reporting entity (observable inputs that are classified within Levels 1 and 2 of the hierarchy) and the reporting entity'sentity’s own assumptions about market participant assumptions (unobservable inputs classified within Level 3 of the hierarchy). Level 1 inputs utilize quoted prices (unadjusted) in active



LTC PROPERTIES, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

markets for identical assets or liabilities that we have the ability to access. Level 2 inputs are inputs other than quoted prices included in Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly. Level 2 inputs may include quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets, as well as inputs that are observable for the asset or liability (other than quoted prices).

The fair value guidance issued by the FASB excludes accounting pronouncements that address fair value measurements for purposes of lease classification or measurement. However, this scope exception does not apply to assets acquired and liabilities assumed in a business combination that are required to be measured at fair value, regardless of whether those assets and liabilities are related to leases.

In accordance with the accounting guidance regarding the fair value option for financial assets and financial liabilities, entities are permitted to choose to measure certain financial assets and liabilities at fair value, with the change in unrealized gains and losses on items for which the fair value option has been elected reported in earnings. We have not elected the fair value option for any of our financial assets or liabilities.

The FASB requires disclosures about fair value of financial instruments for interim reporting periods of publicly traded companies as well as in annual financial statements. SeeNote 16.15. Fair Value Measurements for the disclosure about fair value of our financial instruments.

Investments.  Investments in marketable debt and equity securities are categorized as trading, available-for-saleavailable‑for‑sale or held-to-maturity. Available-for-saleheld‑to‑maturity. Available‑for‑sale securities are stated at fair value, with the unrealized gains and losses, reported in other comprehensive income until realized. Realized gains and losses and declines in value judged to be other-than-temporaryother‑than‑temporary on available-for-saleavailable‑for‑sale securities are included in net income. The cost of securities sold is based on the specific identification method. Interest and dividends on securities classified as available-for-saleavailable‑for‑sale are included in

59


Table of Contents

LTC PROPERTIES, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

interest and other income. Our investment in marketable debt securities is classified as held-to-maturityheld‑to‑ maturity because we have the positive intent and ability to hold the securities to maturity. Held-to-maturityHeld‑to‑maturity securities are stated at amortized cost, adjusted for amortization of premiums and accretion of discounts to maturity.

ASC No. 320,Investments—Debt and Equity Securities, requires an entity to assess whether it intends to sell, or it is more likely than not that it will be required to sell, a debt security in an unrealized loss position before recovery of its amortized cost basis. If either of these criteria is met, the entire difference between fair value and amortized cost is recognized as impairment through earnings. For securities that do not meet the aforementioned criteria, the amount of impairment is split into two components as follows: 1) other-than-temporaryother‑than‑temporary impairment (or OTTI) related to other factors such as an entity'sentity’s ability to make scheduled interest or principal payments on the debt securities, which is recognized in other comprehensive income and 2) OTTI related to credit loss, which must be recognized in the income statement. The credit loss is determined as the difference between the present value of the cash flows expected to be collected and the amortized cost basis.

Revenue Recognition.  Interest income on mortgage loans is recognized using the effective interest method. We follow a policy related to mortgage interest whereby we consider a loan to be non-performingnon‑performing after 60 days of non-paymentnon‑ payment of amounts due and do not recognize unpaid mortgage interest income from that loan until the past due amounts have been received.

Rental income from operating leases is generally recognized on a straight-linestraight‑line basis over the terms of the leases. Substantially all of our leases contain provisions for specified annual increases over the



LTC PROPERTIES, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

rents of the prior year and are generally computed in one of four methods depending on specific provisions of each lease as follows:

    (i)
    a specified annual increase over the prior year's rent, generally between 2.0% and 3.0%;

    (ii)
    a calculation based on the Consumer Price Index;

    (iii)
    as a percentage of facility net patient revenues in excess of base amounts or

    (iv)
    specific dollar increases.

(i)

a specified annual increase over the prior year’s rent, generally between 2.0% and 3.0%;

(ii)

a calculation based on the Consumer Price Index;

(iii)

as a percentage of facility revenues in excess of base amounts or

(iv)

specific dollar increases.

The FASB does not provide for the recognition of contingent revenue until all possible contingencies have been eliminated. We consider the operating history of the lessee and the general condition of the industry when evaluating whether all possible contingencies have been eliminated and have historically, and expect in the future, to not include contingent rents as income until received. We follow a policy related to rental income whereby we consider a lease to be non-performingnon‑ performing after 60 days of non-paymentnon‑payment of past due amounts and do not recognize unpaid rental income from that lease until the amounts have been received.

Rental revenues relating to non-contingentnon‑contingent leases that contain specified rental increases over the life of the lease are recognized on the straight-linestraight‑line basis. Recognizing income on a straight-linestraight‑line basis requires us to calculate the total non-contingentnon‑contingent rent containing specified rental increases over the life of the lease and to recognize the revenue evenly over that life. This method results in rental income in the early years of a lease being higher than actual cash received, creating a straight-linestraight‑line rent receivable asset included in our consolidated balance sheet. At some point during the lease, depending on its terms, the cash rent payments eventually exceed the straight-linestraight‑line rent which results in the straight-linestraight‑line rent receivable asset decreasing to zero over the remainder of the lease term. We assess the collectability of straight-linestraight‑line rent in accordance with the applicable accounting standards and our reserve policy. If the lessee becomes delinquent in rent owed under the terms of the lease, we may provide a reserve against the recognized straight-linestraight‑line rent receivable asset for a portion, up to its full value, that we estimate may not be recoverable.

Payments made to or on behalf of our lessees represent incentives that are deferred and amortized as a yield adjustment over the term of the lease on a straight-line basis. Net loan fee income and commitment fee income are amortized over the life of the related loan. Costs associated

60


Table of Contents

LTC PROPERTIES, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

In May 2014, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2014-09 (or ASU 2014-09), Revenue from Contracts with leases are deferred and allocated over the lease term in proportion toCustomers: Topic 606. ASU 2014-09 provides for a single comprehensive principles based standard for the recognition of rental income.revenue across all industries through the application of the following five-step process:

Step 1: Identify the contract(s) with a customer.

Step 2: Identify the performance obligations in the contract.

Step 3: Determine the transaction price.

Step 4: Allocate the transaction price to the performance obligations in the contract.

Step 5: Recognize revenue when (or as) the entity satisfies a performance obligation.

ASU 2014-09 requires expanded disclosures about the nature, amount, timing and uncertainty of revenue and cash flows arising from contracts with customers. ASU 2014-09 is effective for annual reporting periods (including interim reporting periods within those periods) beginning after December 15, 2016. Early adoption is not permitted. We are evaluating the effects of this adoption on our consolidated financial statements.

Federal Income Taxes.Taxes.  LTC qualifies as a REIT under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, and as such, no provision for Federal income taxes has been made. A REIT is required to distribute at least 90% of its taxable income to its stockholders and a REIT may deduct dividends in computing taxable income. If a REIT distributes 100% of its taxable income and complies with other Internal Revenue Code requirements, it will generally not be subject to Federal income taxation.

For Federal tax purposes, depreciation is generally calculated using the straight-linestraight‑line method over a period of 27.5 years. Earnings and profits, which determine the taxability of distributions to stockholders, use the straight-linestraight‑line method over 40 years. Both Federal taxable income and earnings and profits differ from net income for financial statement purposes principally due to the treatment of certain interest income, rental income, other expense items, impairment charges and the depreciable lives and basis of assets. At December 31, 2013,2014, the tax basis of our net depreciable assets exceeds our book basis by approximately $22,680,000$14,363,000  (unaudited), primarily due to an investment recorded as an acquisition for tax and a mortgage loan for GAAP.



LTC PROPERTIES, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

The FASB clarified the accounting for income taxes by prescribing the minimum recognition threshold a tax position is required to meet before being recognized in the financial statements. The guidance utilizes a two-steptwo‑step approach for evaluating tax positions. Recognition (step one) occurs when a company concludes that a tax position, based solely on its technical merits, is more likely than not to be sustained upon examination. Measurement (step two) is only addressed if step one has been satisfied (i.e., the position is more likely than not to be sustained). Under step two, the tax benefit is measured as the largest amount of benefit (determined on a cumulative probability basis) that is more likely than not to be realized upon ultimate settlement. We currently do not have any uncertain tax positions that would not be sustained on its technical merits on a more-likelymore‑likely than not basis.

We may from time to time be assessed interest or penalties by certain tax jurisdictions. In the event we have received an assessment for interest and/or penalties, it has been classified in our consolidated financial statements as General and administrative expenses.

Concentrations of Credit Risks.  Financial instruments which potentially subject us to concentrations of credit risk consist primarily of cash and cash equivalents, mortgage loans receivable, marketable debt securities and operating leases on owned properties. Our financial instruments, mortgage loans receivable and operating leases, are subject to the possibility of loss of carrying value as a result of the failure of other parties to perform according to their contractual obligations or changes in market prices which may make the instrument less valuable. We obtain various collateral and other protective rights, and continually monitor these rights, in order to reduce such possibilities of loss. In addition, we

61


Table of Contents

LTC PROPERTIES, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

provide reserves for potential losses based upon management'smanagement’s periodic review of our portfolio. SeeNote 3. Major Operators for further discussion of concentrations of credit risk from our tenants.

Discontinued Operations.  Properties classified as held-for-saleheld‑for‑sale on the consolidated balance sheet include only those properties available for immediate sale in their present condition and for which management believes that it is probable that a sale of the property will be completed within one year. Accordingly, we record reclassification adjustments to reflect properties sold subsequent to the respective consolidated balance sheet date as held-for-saleheld‑for‑ sale in the prior period consolidated balance sheet. Properties held-for-saleheld‑for‑ sale are carried at the lower of cost or fair value less estimated selling costs. No depreciation expense is recognized on properties held-for-saleheld‑for‑sale once they have been classified as such. The operating results of real estate assets designated as held-for-saleheld‑for‑sale are included in discontinued operations in the consolidated statement of income. In addition, all gains and losses from real estate sold are also included in discontinued operations. For comparative purposes, as required by

In April 2014, the FASB accounting guidance,issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2014-08 (or ASU 2014-08), Presentation of Financial Statements (Topic 205) and Property, Plant, and Equipment (Topic 360): Reporting Discontinued Operations and Disclosures of Disposals of Components of an Entity. The amendments in ASU 2014-08 change the prior years' operatingcriteria for reporting discontinued operations. Under ASU 2014-08, only disposals representing a strategic shift in operations should be presented as discontinued operations. Those strategic shifts should have a major effect on the organization’s operations and financial results. Examples include a disposal of a major geographic area, a major line of business, or a major equity method investment. ASU 2014-08 is effective in the first quarter of 2015 with early adoption permitted. We elected early adoption of ASU 2014-08 and have not reclassified results of sold and held-for-sale real estate assets have been reclassifiedoperations for properties disposed subsequent to January 1, 2014 as discontinued operations as these disposals do not represent strategic shifts in the consolidated income statement for the prior years.our operations.

Net Income Per Share.  Basic earnings per share is calculated using the weighted-averageweighted‑average shares of common stock outstanding during the period excluding common stock equivalents. Diluted earnings per share includes the effect of all dilutive common stock equivalents.

In accordance with the accounting guidance regarding the determination of whether instruments granted in share-basedshare‑based payments transactions are participating securities, we have applied the two-classtwo‑class method of computing basic earnings per share. This guidance clarifies that outstanding unvested share-basedshare‑based payment awards that contain rights to non-forfeitablenon‑forfeitable dividends participate in undistributed earnings with common stockholders and are considered participating securities.

        Stock-BasedStock‑Based Compensation.  The FASB requires all share-basedshare‑based payments to employees, including grants of employee stock options, to be recognized in the income statement based on their fair values.



LTC PROPERTIES, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

We use the Black-Scholes-MertonBlack‑Scholes‑Merton formula to estimate the value of stock options granted to employees. This model requires management to make certain estimates including stock volatility, expected dividend yield and the expected term. If management incorrectly estimates these variables, the results of operations could be affected. The FASB also requires the benefits of tax deductions in excess of recognized compensation cost to be reported as a financing cash flow. Because we qualify as a REIT under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, we are generally not subject to Federal income taxation. Therefore, this reporting requirement does not have an impact on our statement of cash flows.

Segment Disclosures.  The FASB accounting guidance regarding disclosures about segments of an enterprise and related information establishes standards for the manner in which public business enterprises report information about operating segments. Our investment decisions in senior housing and long term care properties, including mortgage loans, property lease transactions and other investments, are made and resulting investments are managed as a single operating segment for internal reporting and for internal decision-makingdecision‑making purposes. Therefore, we have concluded that we operate as a single segment.

Impact

62


Table of New Accounting Pronouncement.Contents

        In February 2013, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2013-02,Reporting of Amounts Reclassified Out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (or ASU 2013-02). This update requires an entity to provide information about the amounts reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive income by component. In addition, an entity is required to present, either on the face of the statement where net income is presented or in the notes, significant amounts reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive income by the respective line items of net income. The adoption of ASU 2013-02 on January 1, 2013 did not have a material impact on our consolidated financial position or results of operations.LTC PROPERTIES, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

3. Major Operators

We have fourthree operators from each of which we derive over 10% of our combined rental revenue and interest income from mortgage loans. Additionally, we have one operator from which we would have derived over 10%

In July 2014, Brookdale Senior Living, Inc. (or Brookdale), parent company of Brookdale Senior Living Communities, Inc. (or Brookdale Communities), merged with Emeritus Corporation. Brookdale Communities leases 37 assisted living properties with a total of 1,704 units owned by us representing approximately 8.3%, or $79,745,000, of our total assets at December 31, 2014 and 12.2% of our combined rental revenue and interest income from mortgage loans ifrecognized for the year ended December 31, 2014.

Prestige Healthcare (or Prestige) is a privately held company and operates 15 skilled nursing properties and two range of care properties that we hadown or on which we hold a mortgage secured by first trust deeds.  These properties consist of a total of 2,176 skilled nursing beds and 93 assisted living units. Additionally, Prestige manages five parcels of land that we own. These assets represent 14.3% or $138,566,000 of our total assets at December 31, 2014 and generated 11.1% of our combined rental revenue and interest income from mortgage loans recognized for the year ended December 31, 2014. In January 2015, we originated an $11,000,000 mortgage loan with Prestige and concurrently funded $9,500,000 under this loan. The mortgage and construction loan is secured by a 157-bed skilled nursing property in Michigan. Assuming we held the mortgage and construction loan for the full year of 2014, the assets operated by Prestige would represent 15.2% or $147,971,000 of our total assets and would have generated 11.8% of our combined rental revenue and interest income from a mortgage loan we originated duringloans. See Note 6. Real Estate Investments for further discussion on the fourth quarterterms of 2013.the mortgage and construction loan.

Senior Care Centers, LLC (or Senior Care) is a privately held company. During 2013, we entered into an amended and restated master lease agreement with Senior Care to include four skilled nursing properties which were previously operated by and subleased to Senior Care. Under the new amended and restated master lease agreement, Senior Care leases nine skilled nursing properties with a total of 1,190 beds owned by us representing approximately 11.3%10.5%, or $104,984,000,$101,889,000, of our total assets at December 31, 20132014 and 11.3%10.4% of our combined rental revenue and interest income from mortgage loans recognized for the year ended December 31, 2013.2014.

        In 2006,Our master lease with affiliates of Extendicare, Services, Inc. (or EHSI), one of our major operators, effected a reorganization whereby it completed a spin-off ofExtendicare) and Enlivant (formerly known as Assisted Living Concepts, Inc. (or ALC). The remaining EHSI assets and operations were converted into) covering 37 assisted living properties with a Canadian REIT (Extendicare REIT) listedtotal of 1,429 units expired on the Toronto Stock Exchange (or TSX). During 2012, Extendicare REIT converted from an income trust structure to a corporate structure under a corporation named Extendicare, Inc. (or Extendicare). Both Extendicare and ALC continue to be parties to the leases with us. On July 11,December 31, 2014. In 2013,



LTC PROPERTIES, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

ALC merged with Aid Holdings, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (or Aid Holdings), and Aid Merger Sub, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company and a wholly owned subsidiary of Aid Holdings (or Aid Merger Sub). Aid Holdings and Aid Merger Sub are affiliates of TPG Capital, L.P.

        Extendicare and ALC collectively lease 37 assisted living properties with a total of 1,430 units owned by us representing approximately 5.5%, or $51,299,000, of our total assets at For the year ended December 31, 2013 and 10.5%2014, this portfolio generated approximately $10,963,000 or 9.3% of our combined rental revenue and interest income from mortgage loans recognized forloans. During the yearquarter ended December 31, 2013. The 2014, we entered into three agreements relating to the 37 assisted living properties as follows:

·

We sold 16 properties, consisting of 615 units located in Washington, Oregon, Idaho and Arizona to an affiliate of Enlivant for a sales price of $26,465,000. Accordingly, we recognized a gain on sale of $3,819,000. We also gave Enlivant consent to close a property located in Oregon. We are currently exploring sale and lease options for this property which has a net book value of $935,000.

·

We added 13 properties with 500 units in Indiana, Iowa, Ohio, Nebraska and New Jersey to an existing master lease with an affiliate of Senior Lifestyle Management (or Senior Lifestyle). Beginning January 1, 2015, the initial term of the amended and restated master lease will be 15 years and rent will increase by $5,100,000 over the current annual rent, increasing by 2.6% annually thereafter.

63


Table of Contents

LTC PROPERTIES, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

·

We re-leased seven properties with 278 units in Texas to Veritas InCare (or Veritas) under a new 10-year master lease. Beginning January 1, 2015, the initial rent will be $1,461,000 increasing 2.5% annually.

Extendicare and ALCEnlivant paid rent in accordance with the terms of the current master lease expires onleases through December 31, 2014. In JanuaryThe initial cash yield on the 20 properties re-leased to Senior Lifestyle and Veritas is comparable to the cash yield in 2014 we retained CS Capital Advisors, LLC, as our advisors, to assist inunder the marketingexpiring master leases with Extendicare and re-leasing process of these properties.

        Brookdale Senior Living Communities, Inc. (or Brookdale Communities) is a wholly owned subsidiary of a publicly traded company, Brookdale Senior Living, Inc. (or Brookdale). Brookdale CommunitiesEnlivant. Additionally, the new and amended master leases 35 assisted living properties with a total of 1,414 units owned by us representing approximately 5.5%, or $51,581,000, of our total assets at December 31, 2013 and 10.5% of our combined rental revenue and interest income from mortgage loans recognized for the year ended December 31, 2013.

        Preferred Care, Inc. (or Preferred Care), through various wholly owned subsidiaries, operates 27 skilled nursing properties and two range of care properties that we own or on which we hold mortgages secured by first trust deeds. These properties consist of a total of 3,354 skilled nursing beds and 49 assisted living units. This represents approximately 5.4%, or $50,132,000, of our total assets at December 31, 2013 and 10.2% of our combined rental revenue and interest income from mortgage loans recognized for the year ended December 31, 2013. They also operate one skilled nursing property under a sub-lease with another lessee we have which is not included in the Preferred Care rental revenue and interest income from mortgage loans.

        Prestige Healthcare is a privately held company. In October 2013, we funded a $124,387,000 mortgage loan with Prestige Healthcare secured by 15 skilled nursing properties with a total of 2,092 beds. They also lease two range of care properties with a total of 118 skilled nursing beds and 93 assisted living units owned bywill provide us with an asset value of $10,967,000. Additionally, they manage four parcels of land that we own with an asset value of $1,163,000. These assets represent 14.7% or $136,517,000 of our total assetsthe potential for additional rent attributable to participation in revenue growth at December 31, 2013 and generated 3.1% of our combined rental revenue and interest income from mortgage loans recognized for the year ended December 31, 2013 (or 11.5% of our combined rental revenue and interest income from mortgage loans for the year ended December 31, 2013 assuming we held the mortgage for the full year of 2013).properties over a predetermined base amount.

Our financial position and ability to make distributions may be adversely affected by financial difficulties experienced by Extendicare, ALC, Brookdale Communities, Preferred Care,Prestige, Senior Care, Prestige Healthcare, or any of our lessees and borrowers, including any bankruptcies, inability to emerge from bankruptcy, insolvency or general downturn in business of any such operator, or in the event any such operator does not renew and/or extend its relationship with us or our borrowers when it expires.



LTC PROPERTIES, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

4. Supplemental Cash Flow Information

 
 For the year ended
December 31,
 
 
 2013 2012 2011 
 
 (in thousands)
 

Non-cash investing and financing transactions:

          

Acquisition of real estate investments

 $ $ $5,975(1)

Capitalized interest

  932  130  45 

Redemption of non-controlling interest

    396   

Restricted stock issued, net of cancellations

    1   

(1)
We purchased four skilled nursing properties with 524-beds in Texas for $50,841 which consists of $41,000 in cash at closing with the remainder in the form of contingent payments if certain operational thresholds are met. During 2013 and 2011, we paid $7,000 and $4,000, respectively, related to the contingent earn-out payments which have been included in the line itemPayment of earn-out liabilities on our consolidated statement of cash flows. SeeNote 11. Commitments and Contingencies for further discussion.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

For the year ended

 

 

 

December 31,

 

 

  

2014

  

2013

  

2012

 

 

 

(in thousands)

 

Non-cash investing and financing transactions:

    

 

    

    

 

    

    

 

    

 

Earn-out liabilities related to lease incentives (See Note 11)

 

$

3,240 

 

$

 —

 

$

 —

 

Reclassification of pre-development loans (See Note 6)

 

 

304 

 

 

479 

 

 

 —

 

Redemption of non-controlling interest

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

396 

 

Restricted stock issued, net of cancellations

 

 

 

 

 —

 

 

 

5. Impairment

No impairment charges on our real estate investments held and used andwe own or on our mortgage loans receivable were recorded during 2014, 2013 2012 or 2011.2012. However in past years, the long term care industry experienced significant adverse changes which resulted in operating losses by certain of our lessees and borrowers and in some instances the filing by certain lessees and borrowers for bankruptcy protection. Thus, we cannot predict what, if any, impairment charges may be needed in the future.

6. Real Estate Investments

Any reference to the number of properties, number of schools, number of units, number of beds, and yield on investments in real estate are unaudited and outside the scope of our independent registered public accounting firm'sfirm’s audit of our consolidated financial statements in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board.

64


Table of Contents

LTC PROPERTIES, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

Owned Properties.    The following table summarizes our investment in owned properties at December 31, 20132014 (dollar amounts in thousands):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Average

 


  
  
  
 Number of  
 

 

 

 

 

Percentage

 

Number

 

Number of

 

Investment

 


  
  
  
 Average
Investment
per
Bed/Unit
 

 

Gross

 

of

 

of

 

SNF

 

ALF

 

per

 

Type of Property
 Gross
Investments
 Percentage
of
Investments
 Number
of
Properties(1)
 SNF
Beds
 ALF
Units
 

 

Investments

 

Investments

 

Properties(1)

 

Beds

 

Units

 

Bed/Unit

 

Skilled Nursing

 $458,759 48.9% 68 8,264  $55.51 

    

$

482,036 

    

50.8 

%  

68 

    

8,407 

    

 —

    

$

57.34 

 

Assisted Living

 399,912 42.7% 98  4,641 $86.17 

 

 

401,517 

 

42.3 

84 

 

 —

 

4,176 

 

$

96.15 

 

Range of Care

 43,907 4.7% 8 634 274 $48.36 

 

 

43,907 

 

4.6 

 

634 

 

274 

 

$

48.36 

 

Under Development(2)

 21,432 2.3%     

 

 

11,495 

 

1.2 

 —

 

 —

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

Other(3)

 13,607 1.4% 2    

 

 

10,883 

 

1.1 

 

 —

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

             

Totals

 $937,617 100.0% 176 8,898 4,915   

 

$

949,838 

 

100.0 

160 

 

9,041 

 

4,450 

 

 

 

 

             
             

(1)

We have investments in 26 states leased to 30 different operators.

(1)
We have investments in 27 states leased to 33 different operators.
(2)
Includes three MC developments with a total of 168 units, a combination ALF and MC development with a total of 81 units, and a SNF development with 143 beds.
(3)
Includes two schools properties and four parcels of land held-for-use.

(2)

Includes two MC developments with a total of 126 units.


(3)

Includes a school and five parcels of land held-for-use.


LTC PROPERTIES, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

Owned properties are leased pursuant to non-cancelablenon‑cancelable operating leases generally with an initial term of 10 to 15 years. Each lease is a triple net lease which requires the lessee to pay all taxes, insurance, maintenance and repairs, capital and non-capitalnon‑capital expenditures and other costs necessary in the operations of the facilities. Many of the leases contain renewal options. The leases provide for fixed minimum base rent during the initial and renewal periods. The majority of our leases contain provisions for specified annual increases over the rents of the prior year that are generally computed in one of four ways depending on specific provisions of each lease:

    (i)
    a specified annual increase over the prior year's rent, generally between 2.0% and 3.0%;

    (ii)
    a calculation based on the Consumer Price Index;

    (iii)
    as a percentage of facility net patient revenues in excess of base amounts or

    (iv)
    specific dollar increases.

(i)

a specified annual increase over the prior year’s rent, generally between 2.0% and 3.0%;

(ii)

a calculation based on the Consumer Price Index;

(iii)

as a percentage of facility revenues in excess of base amounts or

(iv)

specific dollar increases.

We received no contingent rent income for the yearyears ended December 31, 2014 and 2013. Contingent rent income for the yearsyear ended December 31, 2012 and 2011 was not significant in relation to contractual base rent income.

        The following table summarizes our acquisitions during 2013(dollar amounts in thousands):

Type of Property
 Purchase
Price
 Transaction
Costs
 Total
Acquisition
Costs
 Number
of
Properties
 Number
of
Beds/Units
 

Skilled Nursing(1)

 $14,402 $58 $14,460  1  120 

Land(2)

  4,638    4,638     
            

Totals

 $19,040 $58 $19,098  1  120 
            
            

(1)
A skilled nursingDuring the year ended December 31, 2014, we acquired a 48-unit assisted living property located in Florida whichColorado for $9,800,000 and recorded $130,000 in transaction costs. The property was added to aan existing master lease at an incremental initial cash yield of 8.75%.
(2)
6.5% and we provided the lessee with contingent earn-out payments as a lease inducement. The contingent earn-out agreement requires us to pay two earn-out payments totaling up to $4,000,000 upon the property achieving a sustainable stipulated rent coverage ratio. We estimated the fair value of the contingent earn-out payments using a discounted cash flow analysis and recorded the estimated fair value of $3,240,000 as a lease inducement which is amortized as a yield adjustment over the life of the lease and a contingent earn-out liability which is accreted to the settlement amount as of the estimated payment date. See Note 11. Commitments and Contingencies for further discussion on the accounting treatment of the contingent earn-out liability.  

During 2014, we purchased threea parcel of land held-for-use in Michigan for $450,000. Additionally, we purchased a vacant parcelsparcel of land in ColoradoIllinois for a total of $3,475$1,400,000 under a development pipeline agreement whereby we have the opportunity to finance any senior housing development project or acquisition originated by an operator through May 2018 (unless earlier terminated as provided for therein).operator. The land under the development pipeline agreement was added to an existing master lease and we entered into development commitments in an amount not to exceed $30,256$12,248,000, including the land purchase, to fund the construction of threea 66-unit memory care properties, twoproperty. See below for our total development, redevelopment, renovation and expansion project commitments.

65


Table of Contents

LTC PROPERTIES, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

In February 2015, we funded $7,195,000 under a $12,179,000 development commitment to purchase the land and existing improvements and then complete the related development of a 56-unit memory care property currently under construction in Texas. In conjunction with 60 unitsthis commitment, we entered into a master lease agreement for an initial term of 15 years with three 5-year renewal options at an initial cash yield of 8.75% escalating annually thereafter by the lessor of (i) a calculation based on the Consumer Price Index or (ii) 2.25%. The master lease provides for our payment of a lease inducement of up to $1,589,000, which will be amortized as a yield adjustment over the lease term, with up to 25% of the fee to be disbursed shortly after closing and the balance following the issuance of a certificate of occupancy and receipt of any other regulatory approval required for the operation of the 56-unit memory care property. The master lease also gives us a right to provide similar financing for certain future development opportunities.

Additionally, in February 2015, we elected to exercise our right to provide financing for one such opportunity, adding to the master lease a parcel of land purchased in South Carolina for $2,490,000 coupled with 48 units. Weour commitment to provide the operator with up to $16,535,000, including the land purchase for the development of an 89-unit combination assisted living and memory care property. In conjunction with this new development commitment, the master lease provided for an additional $2,363,000 lease inducement payment, which will be amortized as a yield adjustment over the lease term, with up to 25% of the fee to be disbursed shortly after closing and the balance following the issuance of a certificate of occupancy and receipt of any other regulatory approval required for the operation of the 89-unit combination assisted living and memory care property.    

During the twelve months ended December 31, 2014, we sold 16 assisted living properties with a total of 615 units to an affiliate of Enlivant. The sales price for the 16 properties was $26,465,000, resulting in net sales proceeds of $25,702,000. As a result, we recorded a gain of $3,819,000. As part of this agreement, we consented to the closure of an assisted living property with a net book value of $935,000 and we are exploring sale and lease options for this property. See Note 3. Major Operators for further discussions of the transactions relating to the properties formerly co-leased to affiliates of Extendicare, Inc. and Enlivant. During 2014, we also sold two assisted living properties located in Florida and Georgia with a total of 133 units, a school located in Minnesota, and a closed skilled nursing property for a combined sales price of $8,100,000, resulting in net sales proceeds of $7,891,000, and net gain on sale of $1,140,000.  

66


Table of Contents

LTC PROPERTIES, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

During the twelve months ended December 31, 2014, we completed the following development and improvement projects (dollar amounts in thousands):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    

Number

    

 

    

Number

    

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

 

 

of

 

Type of

 

of

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Type of Project

 

Properties

 

Property

 

Beds/Units

 

State

 

2014 Funding

 

Total Funding

 

Development

 

1

 

ALF

 

60

 

Colorado

 

$

6,351 

 

$

9,689 

(1)

Development

 

1

 

ALF

 

80

 

Texas

 

 

2,300 

 

 

5,691 

(2)

Development

 

1

 

SNF

 

143

 

Kentucky

 

 

10,579 

 

 

20,904 

(3)

Development

 

1

 

ALF

 

48

 

Colorado

 

 

7,257 

 

 

8,744 

(4)

Expansion/Renovation

 

1

 

ALF

 

72

 

Colorado

 

 

6,371 

 

 

6,376 

 

Expansion/Renovation

 

2

 

ALF

 

123

 

Colorado

 

 

5,091 

 

 

5,095 

 

Improvements

 

1

 

SNF

 

120

 

Florida

 

 

500 

 

 

500 

 

Improvements

 

2

 

SNF

 

235

 

New Mexico

 

 

319 

 

 

1,746 

 

 

 

10

 

 

 

881

 

 

 

$

38,768 

(5)

$

58,745 

(5)


(1)

Completed a memory care property in August 2014. The total funded amount includes acquired land of $1,200.

(2)

Completed a memory care property in October 2014. The total funded amount includes acquired land of $1,000.

(3)

Completed in October 2014 and total funded amount includes acquired land of $2,050.

(4)

Completed a memory care property in December 2014. The total funded amount includes acquired land of $850.

(5)

In 2014, we funded $500 to purchase Texas Medicaid bed rights for a 122-bed skilled nursing property under an existing lease. Additionally, during 2014, we funded the final commitment balance of $551 on a newly developed 77-unit assisted living property in Kansas which opened in 2013. In January 2015, we funded an additional $4,711 under these completed projects.

The following table summarizes our investment commitments as of December 31, 2014 and amounts funded on our open development and improvement projects (excludes capitalized interest, dollar amounts in thousands):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

Number

    

Number

 

 

 

Investment

 

2014

 

Commitment

 

Remaining

 

of

 

of

 

Type of Property

 

Commitment

 

Funding(2)

 

Funded

 

Commitment

 

Properties

 

Beds/Units

 

Skilled Nursing

 

$

2,200 

 

$

1,156 

 

$

2,161 

 

$

39 

 

 

141 

 

Assisted Living(1)

 

 

27,751 

 

 

8,831 

 

 

11,268 

 

 

16,483 

 

26 

 

1,194 

 

Totals

 

$

29,951 

 

$

9,987 

(3)

$

13,429 

 

$

16,522 

 (3)  

28 

 

1,335 

 


(1)

Includes the development of a 66-unit memory care property for a commitment of $12,248, as previously discussed, a 60-unit memory care property for a total commitment of $10,703 and the improvement of 24 assisted living properties for a total investment commitment of $4,800.  

(2)

Excludes funding for completed development and improvement projects discussed above and includes $1,400 of land acquired for the development of a 66-unit memory care property, as previously discussed, and the reclass of a pre‑development loan with a balance of $304. See Note 7. Notes Receivable for further discussion of the pre‑development loans.

(3)

In January 2015, we funded $731 under investment commitments. Accordingly, we have a remaining commitment of $15,791. Additionally, in January 2015, we amended an existing master lease with an operator to provide a commitment not to exceed $600 for the purpose of making capital improvements at a 196-skilled nursing property in Texas. Upon the capital improvement deadline of June 30, 2015 or final funding of the capital improvement commitment, the minimum rent will increase by the product of 9% and the total capital improvement funded.

67


Table of Contents

LTC PROPERTIES, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

Our construction in progress (or CIP) activity during the year ended December 31, 2014 for our development, redevelopment, renovation, and expansion projects is as follows (dollar amounts in thousands):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    

 

    

CIP

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

CIP

 

 

 

 

 

Balance at

 

 

 

 

Capitalized

 

Conversions

 

Balance at

 

Properties

 

Projects

 

12/31/2013

 

Funded(1)

 

Interest

 

out of CIP

 

12/31/2014

 

Development projects:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Assisted living

 

 

$

6,334 

 

$

23,149 

 

$

769 

 

$

(21,581)

 

$

8,671 

 

Skilled nursing

 

 

 

5,893 

 

 

10,579 

 

 

505 

 

 

(16,977)

 

 

 —

 

Subtotal

 

 

 

12,227 

 

 

33,728 

 

 

1,274 

 

 

(38,558)

 

 

8,671 

 

Redevelopment, renovation and expansion projects:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Assisted living

 

 

 

 

 

11,463 

 

 

232 

 

 

(11,703)

 

 

 —

 

Skilled nursing

 

 

 

2,433 

 

 

1,661 

 

 

 —

 

 

(4,094)

 

 

 —

 

Subtotal

 

 

 

2,441 

 

 

13,124 

 

 

232 

 

 

(15,797)

 

 

 —

 

Total

 

15 

 

$

14,668 

 

$

46,852 

 

$

1,506 

 

$

(54,355)

 

$

8,671 

 


(1)

Excludes $1,554 of capital improvement commitment funding which was capitalized directly into building and improvements and includes the reclass of a pre‑development loan with a total balance of $304 See Note 7. Notes Receivable for further discussion of pre‑development loans.

During the twelve months ended December 31, 2013 we acquired a 130-bed skilled nursing property located in Florida for $14,402,000 and recorded $58,000 in transaction costs.  In addition, we purchased four parcels of land held-for-use in Michigan for $1,163.

$1,163,000 and three vacant parcels of land in Colorado for a total of $3,475,000 and we entered into development commitments in an amount not to exceed $30,256,000 to fund the construction of three memory care properties.

During the twelve monthsyear ended December 31, 2013,  one of our lessees exercised its option to purchase six skilled nursing properties located in Ohio with a total of 230 beds located in Ohio for an all cash purchase price of $11,000,000. As a result, we recorded a $2,619,000 gain on sale. Also, during 2013, we sold a 47-bed47‑bed skilled nursing property in Colorado for $1,000 and recognized a loss of $1,014,000 on the sale.



LTC PROPERTIES, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

During the twelve months ended December 31, 2013, we completed the following construction projects:

Completed
Date
 Type of Property Number
of
Beds/Units
 State Completed Date 2013 Funding Total Funding 

Jul 2013

 Assisted Living(1)  60  Colorado  Jul 2013 $4,316 $9,850 

Jul 2013

 Skilled Nursing(2)  120  Texas  Jul 2013  5,065  8,635 

Oct 2013

 Assisted Living(3)  77  Kansas  Oct 2013  8,081  9,675(3)
                

 Totals  257       $17,462 $28,160 
                
                

(1)
This new property is a Memory Care property. The funded amount includes acquired land of $1,882.
(2)
This new property replaces a skilled nursing property in our existing portfolio.
(3)
The funded amount includes acquired land of $730.

        We have a commitment to provide, under certain conditions, up to $5,000,000 per year through December 2014 to an existing operator for expansion of the 37 properties they lease from us. The estimated yield of this commitment is 9.5% plus the positive difference, if any, between the average yields on the U.S. Treasury 10-year note for the five days prior to funding, minus 420 basis points. As of December 31, 2013, no funds have been requested under this commitment.

        Excluding the $5,000,000 per year commitment above, the following table summarizes our investment commitments as of December 31, 2013 and year to date funding on our development, redevelopment, renovation, and expansion projects(excludes capitalized interest, dollar amounts in thousands):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    

 

    

Number

    

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Completed

 

 

 

of

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Date

 

Type of Property

 

Beds/Units

 

State

 

2013 Funding

 

Total Funding

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Jul 2013

 

Assisted Living(1)

 

60 

 

Colorado

 

$

4,316 

 

$

9,850 

 

Jul 2013

 

Skilled Nursing(2)

 

120 

 

Texas

 

 

5,065 

 

 

8,635 

 

Oct 2013

 

Assisted Living

 

77 

 

Kansas

 

 

8,081 

 

 

9,675 

(3)

 

 

Totals

 

257 

 

 

 

$

17,462 

 

$

28,160 

 


(1)

Represents a memory care property. The funded amount includes acquired land of $1,882.

(2)

This new property replaces a skilled nursing property in our existing portfolio. The old skilled nursing property was closed upon completion of the replacement property and subsequently sold in 2014, as previously discussed.

(3)

The funded amount includes acquired land of $730. In 2014, we funded an additional $551 and completed this commitment.

Type of Property
 Investment
Commitment
 2013
Funding(2)
 Commitment
Funded
 Remaining
Commitment
 Number
of
Properties
 Number
of
Beds/Units
 

Skilled Nursing

 $29,650 $7,221 $12,757 $16,893  6  640 

Assisted Living(1)

  50,656  9,614  10,661  39,995  7  385 
              

Totals

 $80,306 $16,835(3)$23,418 $56,888(3) 13  1,025 
              
              

68



Contents


LTC PROPERTIES, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

        Our construction in progress (or CIP) activity during the year ended December 31, 2013 for our development, redevelopment, renovation, and expansion projects is as follows(dollar amounts in thousands):

Properties
 Projects CIP
Balance at
12/31/2012
 Funded(1) Capitalized
Interest
 Conversions
out of CIP
 CIP
Balance at
12/31/2013
 

Development projects:

                   

Assisted living

  6 $4,669 $18,584 $510 $(17,429)$6,334 

Skilled nursing

  1  31  5,551  311    5,893 
              

Subtotal

  7  4,700  24,135  821  (17,429) 12,227 

Redevelopment, renovation and expansion projects:

                   

Other

  1  6  117    (123)  

Assisted living

  4  66  21    (79) 8 

Skilled nursing

  5  3,516  6,730  111  (7,924) 2,433 
              

Subtotal

  10  3,588  6,868  111  (8,126) 2,441 
              

Total

  17 $8,288 $31,003 $932 $(25,555)$14,668 
              
              

(1)
Excludes $73 of capital improvement commitment funding which was capitalized directly into building and improvements and includes the reclass of three pre-development loans with a total balance of $479. See Item 7. Notes Receivable for further discussion of the pre-development loans.

The following table summarizes our acquisitions during 2012(dollar amounts in thousands):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

Total

    

Number

    

Number

 

 

Purchase

 

Transaction

 

Acquisition

 

of

 

of

 

Type of Property
 Purchase
Price
 Transaction
Costs
 Total
Acquisition
Costs
 Number
of
Properties
 Number
of
Beds/Units
 

 

Price

 

Costs

 

Costs

 

Properties

 

Beds/Units

 

Skilled Nursing(1)

 $79,100 $275 $79,375 4 522 

 

$

79,100 

 

$

275 

 

$

79,375 

 

 

522 

 

Assisted Living(2)

 81,987 285 82,272 5 266 

 

 

81,987 

 

 

285 

 

 

82,272 

 

 

266 

 

Land(3)

 5,663 207 5,870   

 

 

5,663 

 

 

207 

 

 

5,870 

 

 —

 

 —

 

           

Totals

 $166,750 $767 $167,517 9 788 

 

$

166,750 

 

$

767 

 

$

167,517 

 

 

788 

 

           
           

(1)

Includes two skilled nursing properties with a total of 234 beds located in Texas and two skilled nursing properties with a total of 288 beds located in Ohio.

(1)
Includes two skilled nursing properties with a total of 234 beds located in Texas and two skilled nursing properties with a total of 288 beds located in Ohio.
(2)
Includes two properties with a total of 100 units located in Colorado and three properties with a total of 166 units located in New Jersey.
(3)
We purchased four vacant parcels of land in the following states: Colorado, Kansas, Kentucky and Texas. Simultaneous with the purchase, we entered into lease agreements and development commitments in an amount not to exceed $49,702 to fund the construction of a memory care property with 60 units and two assisted living properties with a total of 158 units and one skilled nursing property with 143 beds.

(2)

Includes two properties with a total of 100 units located in Colorado and three properties with a total of 166 units located in New Jersey.

(3)

We purchased four vacant parcels of land in the following states: Colorado, Kansas Kentucky and Texas. Simultaneous with the purchase, we entered into lease agreements and development commitments in an amount not to exceed $49,702 to fund the construction of a memory care property with 60 units and two assisted living properties with a total of 158 units and one skilled nursing property with 143 beds. These construction projects were subsequently completed in 2014 and 2013.

During the year ended December 31, 2012, we sold a 140-bed140‑bed skilled nursing property located in Texas for $1,248,000 and recognized a gain, net of selling expenses, of $16,000. This property was leased under a master lease and the economic terms of this master lease did not change as a result of this sale.



LTC PROPERTIES, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

        The following table summarizes our acquisitions during 2011(dollar amounts in thousands):

Type of Property
 Purchase
Price
 Transaction
Costs
 Total
Acquisition
Costs
 Number
of
Properties
 Number
of
Beds/Units
 

Skilled Nursing(1)(2)

 $93,841 $330 $94,171  7  1,016 

Range of Care(3)

  11,450  34  11,484  2  211 

Land(4)

  844  11  855     
            

Totals

 $106,135 $375 $106,510  9  1,227 
            
            

(1)
Includes two skilled nursing properties with a total of 336 beds located in Texas for $25,500 and a 156-bed skilled nursing property located in California for $17,500.
(2)
We purchased four skilled nursing properties with 524-beds in Texas for $50,841 which consists of $41,000 in cash at closing with the remainder in the form of contingent earn-out payments. The contingent earn-out payment arrangements require us to pay two earn-out payments totaling up to $11,000 upon the properties achieving a sustainable stipulated rent coverage ratio. During 2013 and 2011,2012, we paid $7,000funded $13,135,000 and $4,000,$11,089,000, respectively, related to the contingent earn-out payment.on open development and improvement projects. SeeNote 11. Commitments table above for funding on completed development and Contingencies for further discussion on the contingent earn-out.
(3)
We purchased two senior housing properties located in South Carolina with 118 skilled nursing beds, 40 assisted living units and 53 independent living units for $11,450.
(4)
We acquired a vacant parcel of land in Texas for the purpose of building a replacement skilled nursing property for a purchase price of $844.
improvement projects.

Depreciation expense on buildings and improvements, including properties classified as held-for-sale,held‑for‑sale, was $25,424,000,  $24,568,000, $22,002,000, and $19,487,000$22,002,000 for the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 2012 and 2011,2012, respectively.

Future minimum base rents receivable under the remaining non-cancelablenon‑cancelable terms of operating leases excludingincluding the fourre-leasing of the 20 assisted living properties being transitionedformerly co-leased to a new lessee,affiliates of Extendicare and Enlivant, as previously discussed inNote 2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies, and assuming the Extendicare and ALC master leases are not re-leased at maturity in December 2014, as previously discussed inNote 3. Major Operators, and excluding the effects of straight-linestraight‑line rent and extensionrenewal options are as follows (in thousands):

 

 

 

 

 

 

    

Annual Cash

 

 

 

Rent

 

2015

 

$

98,150 

 

2016

 

 

102,113 

 

2017

 

 

101,009 

 

2018

 

 

97,955 

 

2019

 

 

92,658 

 

Thereafter

 

 

445,768 

 

69


 
 Annual Cash
Rent
 

2014

 $97,132 

2015

  85,132 

2016

  85,393 

2017

  84,688 

2018

  81,028 

Thereafter

  374,524 

Table of Contents


LTC PROPERTIES, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

Set forth in the table below are the components of the income from discontinued operations (in thousands):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

For the year ended

 


 For the year ended
December 31,
 

 

December 31,

 


 2013 2012 2011 

 

2014

 

2013

 

2012

 

Rental income

 $1,123 $1,551 $1,547 

    

$

 —

    

$

1,123 

    

$

1,551 

 

       

Total revenues

 1,123 1,551 1,547 

 

 

 —

 

 

1,123 

 

 

1,551 

 

Depreciation and amortization

 
(317

)
 
(540

)
 
(712

)

 

 

 —

 

 

(317)

 

 

(540)

 

General and administrative expenses

 (1) (6) (12)

 

 

 —

 

 

(1)

 

 

(6)

 

       

Total expenses

 (318) (546) (724)

 

 

 —

 

 

(318)

 

 

(546)

 

       

Income from discontinued operations

 $805 $1,005 $823 

 

$

 —

 

$

805 

 

$

1,005 

 

       
       

 

Mortgage Loans.  The following table summarizes our investments in mortgage loans secured by first mortgages at December 31, 20132014 (dollar amounts in thousands):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Percentage

 

Number

 

Number

 

Number of

 

Investment

 


  
  
  
  
 Number of  
 

 

Gross

 

of

 

of

 

of

 

SNF

 

ALF

 

per

 

Type of Property
 Gross
Investments
 Percentage
of
Investments
 Number
of
Loans
 Number
of
Properties(1)
 SNF
Beds
 ALF
Units
 Investment
per
Bed/Unit
 

 

Investments

 

Investments

 

Loans

 

Properties(1)

 

Beds

 

Units

 

Bed/Unit

 

Skilled Nursing(2)

 $152,401 91.2% 16 32 3,953  $38.55 

    

$

151,016 

    

90.3 

%  

15 

    

29 

    

3,650 

    

 —

    

$

41.37 

 

Assisted Living

 12,112 7.2% 3 8  211 $57.40 

 

 

14,003 

 

8.3 

%  

 

 

 —

 

270 

 

$

51.86 

 

Range of Care

 2,602 1.6% 1 1 99 74 $15.04 

 

 

2,310 

 

1.4 

%  

 

 

99 

 

74 

 

$

13.35 

 

               

Totals

 $167,115 100.0% 20 41 4,052 285   

 

$

167,329 

 

100.0 

%  

19 

 

38 

 

3,749 

 

344 

 

 

 

 

               
               

(1)

We have investments in 9 states that include mortgages to 12 different operators.

(1)
We have investments in 9 states that include mortgages to 12 different operators.
(2)
Includes a mortgage and construction loan secured by a currently operating skilled nursing property and parcel of land upon which a 106-bed replacement property is being constructed.

(2)

In January 2015, we received $2,285 plus accrued interest for the payoff of a mortgage loan secured by one range of care property.

At December 31, 2013,2014, the mortgage loans had interest rates ranging from 7.0% to 13.6%13.7% and maturities ranging from 20142015 to 2043. In addition, some loans contain certain guarantees, provide for certain facility fees and generally have 20-year20‑year to 30-year30‑year amortization schedules. The majority of the mortgage loans provide for annual increases in the interest rate based upon a specified increase of 10 to 25 basis points.

During the year ended December 31, 2013,2014, we fundedoriginated a $124,387,000$3,027,000 mortgage loan with a third-party operator, Prestige Healthcare, secured by 15 skilled nursing properties with a total of 2,092 beds100-unit independent living property in Michigan.Arizona. The loan is for a term of 30five years and bears interest at 9.53% for five years,7.0%, escalating annually thereafter by 2.25%. Payments are interest-only for three years, after which the borrower will make interest payments along with annual principal payments of $1,000,000. The loan agreement provides for additional forward commitments of $12,000,000 for capital improvements at 9.41% for the first twelve months. Beginning in the thirteenth month, the interest will be the greater of 7.25% plus the positive difference, if any, between the average yields on the U.S. Treasury 10-year note for the twenty days prior to funding or 9.0% with annual escalations of 2.25%. The loan agreement also provides, under certain conditions and based on certain operating metrics and valuation thresholds achieved and sustained within the first twelve years of the term, for additional loan proceeds of up to $40,000,000 with such proceeds limited to $10,000,000 per twelve months. The term for the additional loan proceeds will be at the greater of 7.25% plus the positive difference, if any, between the average



LTC PROPERTIES, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

yields on the U.S. Treasury 10-year note for the twenty days prior to funding or 9.0% with annual escalations of 2.25%.

        The borrower has a one-time option between the third and twelfth years to prepay up to 50% of the then outstanding loan balance without penalty. Exclusively for the purposes of this option, the properties collateralizing the loan have been separated by us into two pools of assets. If and when the option is exercised, we will identify which of the two pools we will release for prepayment and removal from portfolio of properties securing the loan. If the prepayment option is exercised and timely concluded, the borrower forfeits its opportunity to access any additional loan proceeds. Additionally, under certain circumstances, including a change in regulatory environment, we have the option to purchase the properties.

0.25% annually. During the twelve months ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012, we funded $3,010,000,  $4,971,000, and $2,619,000 respectively, under a $10,600,000 mortgage and construction loan. Subsequent to these investments, the mortgage and construction loan that originated during 2012.was fully funded. This mortgage and construction loan iswas secured by a currently operating skilled nursing property and a vacant parcel of land upon which anewly constructed 106-bed replacement facility is being constructed. The term is 10 yearsskilled nursing property. Upon completion of the 106-bed replacement skilled nursing property, the residents of the old skilled nursing property were relocated to the new skilled nursing property and the interest rate isold skilled nursing property was closed. During 2014, the greater of 7.25% plusold skilled nursing property was sold by the positive difference, if any, between the average yields on the U.S. Treasury 10-year note for the twenty days prior to funding, but no less than 9.25% with annual escalations of 0.25%.The agreement gives us the right to purchaseborrower and released as collateral. In February 2015, we purchased and equipped the replacement facilityproperty for $13,500,000 during an 18 month period beginning ona total of $13,946,000 by exercising our right under the first anniversary of the issuance of the certificate of occupancy. If the purchase option is exercised, the replacement facility will beagreement. The property was added to an existing master lease at a lease rate equivalent to the interest rate in effect on the loan at the time the purchase option iswas exercised. AsAdditionally, we paid the lessee a $1,054,000 lease inducement which will be amortized as a yield adjustment over the life of the lease term.

During 2013, we funded the initial amount of $124,387,000 under a mortgage loan with a third‑party operator, Prestige, secured by 15 skilled nursing properties with a total of 2,058 beds in Michigan. The loan agreement provides for additional commitments of $12,000,000 for capital improvements and, under certain conditions and based on certain

70


Table of Contents

LTC PROPERTIES, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

operating metrics and valuation thresholds achieved and sustained within the initial twelve years of the term, up to $40,000,000 of additional proceeds, for a total loan commitment of up to $176,387,000. During 2014, we funded $3,337,000 under the $12,000,000 capital improvement commitment with $8,663,000 remaining as of December 31, 2013,2014. In January 2015, we funded an additional $770,000 under the $12,000,000 capital improvement commitment, with a corresponding reduction in the remaining commitment balance to $7,893,000.  

In addition, this mortgage loan provided the borrower a one‑time option to prepay up to 50% of the then outstanding loan balance without penalty. In January 2015, we amended this mortgage loan to provide up to an additional $20,000,000 in loan proceeds for the redevelopment of two properties securing the loan (increasing the total capital improvement commitment to $32,000,000 and the total loan commitment to $196,387,000) and agreed to convey, to Prestige, two parcels of land held-for-use adjacent to these properties to facilitate the projects. As partial consideration for the increased commitment and associated conveyance, the borrower forfeited their prepayment option. As a result of the forfeiture of the prepayment option, we expect to record $1,296,000 of effective interest during 2015.

Additionally, in January 2015, we originated an $11,000,000 mortgage loan with Prestige concurrently funding $9,500,000 with a commitment to fund the balance for approved capital improvement projects. The loan is secured by a 157-bed skilled nursing property in Michigan and bears interest at 9.41% for five years, escalating annually thereafter by 2.25%. The term is 30 years with interest-only payments. After the thirteenth month of the commencement date, the interest rate on newly advanced amounts on the mortgage and construction loan will equal the greater of (i) 7.25% plus the positive difference, if any, between the average yield on the U.S. Treasury 10-year note for the twenty days prior to funding or (ii) 9.0% with annual escalations of 2.25%. Additionally, we have the option to purchase the property under certain circumstances, including a remaining commitment of $3,010,000 under this loan. change in regulatory environment. 

During the year ended 2012, we also originated a $5,100,000 two-year interest-onlytwo‑year interest‑only bridge loan. The loan is secured by a 70-unit70‑unit assisted living property in Pennsylvania and bears interest at 7.0% increasing annually by 1.5%. During 2014, we extended this loan for an additional two years. 

At December 31, 20132014 and 20122013 the carrying values of the mortgage loans were $165,444,000$165,656,000 and $39,299,000,$165,444,000, respectively. Scheduled principal payments on mortgage loan receivables are as follows(in thousands):

 

 

 

 


 Scheduled
Principal
 

    

Scheduled

 

2014

 $14,244 

 

Principal

 

2015

 4,272 

 

$

4,642 

 

2016

 2,695 

 

 

7,527 

 

2017

 7,118 

 

 

7,308 

 

2018

 8,233 

 

 

8,425 

 

2019

 

 

5,137 

 

Thereafter

 130,553 

 

 

134,290 

 

   

Total

 $167,115 

 

$

167,329 

 

   
   

 

During the twelve months ended December 31, 2014, 2013 2012 and 2011,2012, we received $2,159,000,  $1,933,000, $2,572,000, and $3,136,000,$2,572,000, respectively in regularly scheduled principal payments. During 2014, we received $6,996,000 plus accrued interest related to the year ended December 31,early payoff of two mortgage loans secured by three skilled nursing properties and one assisted living property. In January 2015, we received $2,285,000 plus accrued interest for the payoff of a mortgage loan secured by one range of care property. During 2012, we received $19,061,000 plus accrued interest related to the early payoff of eleven mortgage loans secured by four skilled nursing properties and seven assisted living properties. During the year ended December 31, 2011, we received $2,831,000 plus accrued interest related to the payoff

71


7. Notes Receivable

Note receivable consists of various loans, and line of credit agreements with certain operators. During 2013, we received $3,035,000 for the early repayment of two loans with interest rates ranging from 8.5% to 9.0%. Also during 2013,2014, we committed to fund three loans upa $500,000 working capital loan to $400,000 eachan existing operator with interest at 12%. Two of these loans mature in September 2017 and one matures6.5% maturing in December 2017. We also committed2019 and to fund three pre-developmentfour pre‑development loans of $325,000 each to facilitate the site selection and pre-construction servicespre‑construction costs for the future development of threefour memory care properties. The initial rate of each of these pre-developmentpre‑development loans is 12%,  increasing by 25 basis points per year. EachOne of these pre-developmentpre‑development loans matured due to the acquisition of the land and the outstanding balance of $479,000$304,000 was reclassified to real estate under development during 2013.2014. 

        As ofAt December 31, 2013,2014, we have sevenhad eleven loans and line of credit agreements with a total commitment of $2,425,000commitments totaling $3,788,000 and a remaining commitment balance of $1,830,000.$2,346,000. The weighted average interest rate of these loansloan commitments is 11.5%11.4%. During 2014, 2013, 2012, and 2011,2012, we received principal payments, including loan payoffs, of $113,000,  $3,110,000, $569,000, and $731,000,$569,000, respectively, and we advanced principal of $1,263,000, $1,004,000, and $2,930,000, respectively, under our notes. In January 2015, we advanced $500,000 under our loans and $232,000, respectively.line of credit agreements and committed to fund a working capital loan of $500,000 to an existing operator with interest at 6.5% maturing in February 2019. Accordingly, we have twelve loans and line of credit agreements with commitments totaling $4,288,000 and a remaining commitment balance of $2,346,000. 

8. Marketable Securities

During 2012, Skilled Healthcare Group, Inc. (or SHG) redeemed all of their outstanding Senior Subordinated Notes at par value plus accrued and unpaid interest up to the redemption date. The SHG Senior Subordinated Notes had a face rate of 11.0% and an effective yield of 11.1%. During 2012, we recognized $235,000 of interest income from our $6,500,000 investment in SHG Senior Subordinated Notes. One of our board members was the chief executive officer of SHG until his retirement on November 20, 2013. SeeNote 12. Transactions with Related Party for further discussion.

9. Debt Obligations

Bank Borrowings.  During 2012,the three months ended December 31, 2014, we amended our Unsecured Credit Agreement increasing the commitment to $240,000,000$400,000,000 with the opportunity to increase the credit amount up to a total of $350,000,000.$600,000,000. Additionally, the drawn pricing was decreased by 25 basis points the undrawn pricing was decreased by 10 basis points and the maturity of the facility was extended for one additional year to May 25, 2016.October 14, 2018. The amendment also provides for a one-yearone‑year extension option at our discretion, subject to customary conditions. Based on our leverage ratios at December 31, 2013,2014, the amended facility provides for interest annually at LIBOR plus 125115 basis points and the unused commitment fee was 25 basis points.

Financial covenants contained in the Unsecured Credit Agreement, which are measured quarterly, require us to maintain, among other things:

(i)

a ratio of total indebtedness to total asset value not greater than 0.5 to 1.0;

(ii)

a ratio of secured debt to total asset value not greater than 0.35 to 1.0;

(iii)

a ratio of unsecured debt to the value of the unencumbered asset value not greater than 0.6 to 1.0; and

(iv)

a ratio of EBITDA, as calculated in the Unsecured Credit Agreement, to fixed charges not less than 1.50 to 1.0.

During 20132014, we borrowed $93,000,000$37,500,000 and repaid $187,500,000$58,500,000 under our unsecured revolving line of credits. At December 31, 2014, we had no outstanding borrowings under our Unsecured Credit Agreement. At December 31, 2013, we had $21,000,000 outstanding at an interest rate of LIBOR plus 1.25%Agreement and $219,000,000$400,000,000 available for borrowing. In JanuarySubsequent December 31, 2014, we borrowed $11,500,000 at an



LTC PROPERTIES, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

interest rate of LIBOR plus 1.25%$18,000,000 under our unsecured revolving line of credit. Accordingly, we have $32,500,000$18,000,000 outstanding and $207,500,000$382,000,000 available for borrowing. At December 31, 20132014 and 2012,2013, we were in compliance with all covenants.

72


Table of Contents

LTC PROPERTIES, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

Senior Unsecured Notes.  At December 31, 2014 and 2013, we had $281,633,000 and $255,800,000, respectively, outstanding under our Senior Unsecured Notes with a weighted average interest rate of 4.81% and 4.85%., respectively. During 2013,2014, we sold $30,000,000 senior unsecured term notes to affiliates and managed accounts of Prudential Investment Management, Inc. (or individually and collectively Prudential) under our Amended and Restated Note Purchase and Private Shelf agreement. These notes bear interest at 4.5% and will mature on July 31, 2026. We used the proceeds to pay down our unsecured revolving line of credit. As a result of the sale of $30,000,000 senior unsecured term notes, our Amended and Restated Note Purchase and Private Shelf agreement has been exhausted with no more availability. Also, during 2014, we paid $4,167,000 in regularly scheduled principal payments.

During 2013, we sold to Prudential $70,000,000 aggregate principal amount of 3.99% senior unsecured term notes fully amortizing to maturity on November 20, 2021. We used the proceeds to pay down our unsecured revolving line of credit.

        On October 30, 2013, we entered into an amended and restated note purchase and private shelf agreement with Prudential. The shelf agreement with Prudential, as amended, conforms the definitions and financial covenants contained therein and previously issued senior unsecured promissory notes outstanding to Prudential and certain of its affiliates and managed accounts to those contained in our unsecured credit facility and to covenants contained in the senior unsecured notes sold in July 2012. Any notes sold by us to Prudential under the shelf agreement will be in amounts at fixed interest rates and have maturity dates (each note to have a final maturity not greater than 12 years and an average life not greater than 10 years from the date of issuance) subject to further agreement by us and Prudential.

        The shelf agreement with Prudential contains standard covenants including requirements to maintain financial ratios such as debt to asset value ratios. Under the shelf agreement, maximum total indebtedness shall not exceed 50% of total asset value as defined in the shelf agreement, as amended. Borrowings under the shelf agreement are limited by reference to the value of unencumbered assets. Under the shelf agreement, maximum unsecured debt shall not exceed 60% of the value of the unencumbered asset pool as defined in the shelf agreement.

During 2012, we sold 12-year12‑year senior unsecured notes in the aggregate amount of $85,800,000 to a group of institutional investors in a private placement transaction. The notes bear interest at 5.0%, and mature on July 19, 2024 and have scheduled annual principal pay downs in years 8 through 12. During 2011,2024. Additionally during 2012, we sold to Prudential $50,000,000 aggregate principal amount of 4.80% senior unsecured term notes fully amortizing to maturity on July 20, 2021.

Bonds Payable.    At December 31, 2013 and 2012During 2014, we had outstanding principal of $2,035,000 and $2,635,000, respectively, onpaid off a $1,400,000 multifamily tax-exempttax‑exempt revenue bondsbond that arewas secured by five assisted living properties in Washington. These bonds bearbore interest at a variable rate that is reset weeklyweekly. During 2014 and mature during 2015. For the year ended December 31, 2013, the weighted average interest rate, including letter of credit fees, on the outstanding bonds was 2.9%. During 2013 and 2012 we paid $600,000$635,000 and $565,000,$600,000, respectively, in regularly scheduled principal payments. At December 31, 2013 and 2012, the aggregate carrying value of real estate properties securing our bonds payable was $6,386,000 and $6,650,000, respectively.



LTC PROPERTIES, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

Scheduled Principal Payments.    The following table represents our long term contractual obligations (scheduled principal payments and amounts due at maturity) as of December 31, 2013,2014, and excludes the effects of interest (in thousands):

 
 Total 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Thereafter 

Bank borrowings

 $21,000 $ $ $21,000 $ $ $ 

Senior unsecured notes

  255,800  4,167  29,166  26,667  26,167  28,167  141,466 

Bonds payable

  2,035  635  1,400         
                

 $278,835 $4,802 $30,566 $47,667 $26,167 $28,167 $141,466 
                
                

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    

Total

    

2015

    

2016

    

2017

    

2018

    

2019

    

Thereafter

 

Bank borrowings

 

$

 —

 

$

 —

 

$

 —

 

$

 —

 

$

 —

 

$

 —

 

$

 —

 

Senior unsecured notes

 

 

281,633 

 

 

29,166 

 

 

26,667 

 

 

26,167 

 

 

28,167 

 

 

25,666 

 

 

145,800 

 

 

 

$

281,633 

 

$

29,166 

 

$

26,667 

 

$

26,167 

 

$

28,167 

 

$

25,666 

 

$

145,800 

 

10. Equity

Preferred Stock.  At December 31, 20132014 and 2012,2013, we had 2,000,000 shares of our 8.5% Series C Cumulative Convertible Preferred Stock (or Series C preferred stock) outstanding. Our Series C preferred stock is convertible into 2,000,000 shares of our common stock at $19.25 per share and dividends are payable quarterly. Total shares reserved for issuance of common stock related to the conversion of Series C preferred stock were 2,000,000 shares at December 31, 20132014 and 2012.2013.

Common Stock.    During 2014, we sold 600,000 shares of common stock at a price of $41.50 per share in a registered direct placement to certain institutional investors. The net proceeds of $24,644,000 were used to pay down amounts outstanding under our unsecured line of credit, to fund current developments and for general corporate purposes. During 2013, we sold 4,025,000 shares of common stock in a public offering at a price of $44.50 per share, before fees and costs of $7,748,000.share. The net proceeds of $171,365,000 were used to pay down amounts outstanding under our unsecured revolving line of credit, to fund acquisitions and our current development commitments and for general corporate purposes. Also, duringDuring 2014 and 2013, we acquired 5,324 shares and 6,925 shares, respectively, of common stock held by employees who tendered owned shares to satisfy tax withholding obligations. Subsequent to December 31, 2014, we acquired 4,609 shares of common stock held by employees who tendered owned shares to satisfy tax withholding obligations.

During 2013, we terminated the equity distribution agreement which allowed us to issue and sell, from time to time, up to $85,686,000 in aggregate offering price of our common shares. Sales of common shares arewere made by means of ordinary brokers'brokers’ transactions at market prices, in block transactions, or as otherwise agreed between us and our sales

73


Table of Contents

LTC PROPERTIES, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

agents. During the twelve months ended December 31, 2013, we sold 126,742 shares of common stock for $4,895,000 in net proceeds under our equity distribution agreement. In conjunction with the sale of common stock, we reclassified $662,000 of accumulated costs associated with the equity distribution agreement to additional paid in capital. During 2012, we did not sell shares of our common stock under our equity distribution agreement.

During 2012, we amended our charter to increase the number of authorized shares of common stock from 45,000,000 shares to 60,000,000 shares. The charter amendment was approved by our stockholders at the 2012 annual meeting of stockholders held on May 22, 2012.

Available Shelf Registration.  On July 19, 2013, we filed a Form S-3ASR "shelf"S‑3ASR “shelf” registration statement to replace our prior shelf registration statement. This current shelf registration statement provides us with the capacity to offer up to $800,000,000 in common stock, preferred stock, warrants, debt, depositary shares, or units. We may from time to time raise capital under this current shelf registration in amounts, at prices, and on terms to be announced when and if the securities are offered. The specifics of any future offerings, along with the use of proceeds of any securities offered, will be described in detail in a prospectus supplement, or other offering materials, at the time of the offering. At December 31, 20132014 we had availability of $800,000,000$775,100,000 under our effective shelf registration.registration which expires on July 19, 2016.

        Non-controllingNon‑controlling Interests.  We currently have no limited partners. During 2012, we had one limited partnership. The limited partnership agreement allowed the limited partners to convert, on a



LTC PROPERTIES, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

one-for-one one‑for‑one basis, their limited partnership units into shares of common stock or the cash equivalent, at our option. Since we exercised control, we consolidated the limited partnership and we carried the non-controllingnon‑controlling interests at cost.

During 2012, two of our limited partners exercised their conversion rights to exchange all of their 112,588 partnership units. At our discretion, we converted 23,294 partnership units into an equal number of our common shares. The partnership conversion price was $17.00 per partnership unit. At our discretion, we elected to satisfy the conversion of 89,294 limited partnership units with cash. We paid the limited partners $2,764,000, which represents the closing price of our common stock on the redemption date plus $0.05 per share multiplied by the number of limited partnership units redeemed. The amount we paid upon redemption exceeded the book value of the limited partnership interest redeemed by $1,246,000. Accordingly, the $1,246,000 excess book value of the limited partners'partners’ interest in the partnership was reclassified to stockholders'stockholders’ equity. We accounted for these conversions as an equity transaction because there was no change in control requiring consolidation or deconsolidation and remeasurement. Subsequent to these partnership conversions, the assets held by the limited partnership were transferred to other subsidiaries of the Company and the limited partnership was terminated. At December 31, 20122014 and 2013, we had no shares of our common stock reserved under any partnership agreements.

The following table represents the effect of changes in our ownership interest in the limited partnership on equity attributable to LTC Properties, Inc.(in thousands):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Years Ended December 31,

 

 

 

2014

 

2013

 

2012

 

Net income attributable to LTC Properties, Inc.

    

$

73,399 

    

$

57,815 

    

$

51,290 

 

Transfers from the non-controlling interest

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Increase in paid-in capital for limited partners conversion

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

396 

 

Decrease in paid-in capital for limited partners conversion

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

(1,246)

 

Change from net income attributable to LTC Properties, Inc. and transfers from non-controlling interest

 

$

73,399 

 

$

57,815 

 

$

50,440 

 

74


 
 Years Ended December 31, 
 
 2013 2012 2011 

Net income attributable to LTC Properties, Inc. 

 $57,815 $51,290 $49,252 

Transfers from the non-controlling interest

          

Increase in paid-in capital for limited partners conversion

    396   

Decrease in paid-in capital for limited partners conversion

    (1,246)  
        

Change from net income attributable to LTC Properties, Inc. and transfers from non-controlling interest

 $57,815 $50,440 $49,252 
        
        

Table of Contents

LTC PROPERTIES, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

Distributions.    We declared and paid the following cash dividends (in thousands):

 
 Year Ended
December 31, 2013
 Year ended
December 31, 2012
 
 
 Declared Paid Declared Paid 

Preferred Stock Series C

 $3,273 $3,273 $3,273 $3,273 

Common Stock

  63,631(1) 63,631(1) 54,512(2) 54,512(2)
          

Total

 $66,904 $66,904 $57,785 $57,785 
          
          

(1)
Represents $0.155 per share per month for January through September 2013 and $0.17 per share per month for October through December 2013
(2)
Represents $0.145 per share per month for January through July of 2012 and $0.155 per share per month for August through December of 2012.


LTC PROPERTIES, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Year Ended

 

Year Ended

 

 

 

December 31, 2014

 

December 31, 2013

 

 

 

Declared

 

Paid

 

Declared

 

Paid

 

Preferred Stock Series C

    

$

3,273 

    

$

3,273 

    

$

3,273 

    

$

3,273 

 

Common Stock

 

 

71,158 

(1)

 

71,158 

(1)

 

63,631 

(2)

 

63,631 

(2)

Total

 

$

74,431 

 

$

74,431 

 

$

66,904 

 

$

66,904 

 


(1)

Represents $0.17 per share per month for the twelve months ended December 31, 2014.

(2)

Represents $0.155 per share per month for January through September 2013 and $0.17 per share per month for October through December 2013.

In January 2014,2015, we declared a monthly cash dividend of $0.17 per share on our common stock for the months of January, February and March 20142015 payable on January 31,30, February 2827 and March 31, 2014,2015, respectively, to stockholders of record on January 23,22, February 2019 and March 21, 2014,23, 2015, respectively.

Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income.  During the years we had investments in Real Estate Mortgage Investment Conduit (or REMIC) Certificates, we retained the non-investmentnon‑investment grade certificates issued in the securitizations. During 2005, a loan was paid off in the last remaining REMIC pool which caused the last third party REMIC Certificate holders entitled to any principal payments to be paid off in full. After this transaction, we became the sole holder of the remaining REMIC Certificates and arewere therefore entitled to the entire principal outstanding of the loan pool underlying the remaining REMIC Certificates. Under the FASB accounting guidance relating to accounting for changes that result in a transferor regaining control of financial assets sold, a Special Purpose Entity (or SPE) may become non-qualifiednon‑qualified or tainted which generally results in the "repurchase"“repurchase” by the transferor of all the assets sold to and still held by the SPE. Since we were the sole REMIC Certificate holder entitled to principal from the underlying loan pool, we had all the risks and were entitled to all the rewards from the underlying loan pool. As required by the accounting guidance, the repurchase for the transferred assets was accounted for at fair value. The accumulated other comprehensive income balance represents the fair market value adjustment offset by any previously adjusted impairment charge which is amortized to increase interest income over the remaining life of the loans that we repurchased from the REMIC pool. At December 31, 20132014 and 2012, other equity consisted of $117,000 and $152,000, respectively, of2013,  accumulated other comprehensive income.income was $82,000 and $117,000, respectively.

Stock Based Compensation Plans.  During 2008 we adopted and our shareholders approved the 2008 Equity Participation Plan under which 600,000 shares of common stock have been reserved for awards, including nonqualified stock option grants and restricted stock grants to officers, employees, non-employeenon‑employee directors and consultants. The terms of the awards granted under the 2008 Equity Participation Plan are set by our compensation committee at its discretion.

75


Table of Contents

LTC PROPERTIES, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

Restricted Stock.    During 20132014 and 2012,2013, we granted 34,40095,000 and 90,50034,400 shares of restricted common stock, respectively, as follows:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    

 

Price per

 

 

Year

 

No. of Shares

 

Share

 

Vesting Period

2014

    

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

59,000 

 

$

36.81 

 

ratably over 3 years

 

 

3,000 

 

$

38.43 

 

ratably over 3 years

 

 

15,000 

 

$

40.05 

 

ratably over 3 years

 

 

10,500 

 

$

40.05 

 

June 9, 2015

 

 

7,500 

 

$

41.34 

 

November 12, 2015

 

 

95,000 

 

 

 

 

 

2013

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

8,400 

 

$

46.54 

 

ratably over 3 years

 

 

6,000 

 

$

41.83 

 

ratably over 3 years

 

 

20,000 

 

$

36.26 

 

June 1, 2016

 

 

34,400 

 

 

 

 

 

Year
 No. of Shares Price per
Share
 Vesting Period

2013:

        

  8,400 $46.54 ratably over 3 years

  6,000 $41.83 ratably over 3 years

  20,000 $36.26 June 1, 2016
        

  34,400     
        
        

2012:

        

  14,000 $31.77 ratably over 5 years

  12,200 $31.77 January 10, 2016

  30,000 $31.77 June 15, 2015

  8,000 $31.87 ratably over 3 years

  6,300 $34.90 ratably over 5 years

  20,000 $34.90 December 20, 2015
        

  90,500     
        
        


LTC PROPERTIES, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

        Also duringIn January 2015, we cancelled 640 shares of restricted stock. In February 2015, we granted 65,750 shares of restricted common stock at $44.45 per share. These shares vest ratably from the twelve months ended December 31,grant date over a three-year period. During 2013, the vesting of 18,180 shares of restricted common stock were accelerated due to the retirement of our former Senior Vice President, Marketing and Strategic Planning. In February 2014, we granted 59,000 shares of restricted common stock at $36.81 per share. These shares vest ratably over a three-year period from the grant date. Dividends are payable on the restricted shares to the extent and on the same date as dividends are paid on all of our common stock. Restricted stock activity for the years ended December 31, 20132014 and 20122013 was as follows:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


 2013 2012 

    

2014

    

2013

 

Outstanding, January 1

 195,449 165,134 

 

 

165,149 

 

 

195,449 

 

Granted

 34,400 90,500 

 

 

95,000 

 

 

34,400 

 

Vested

 (64,700) (60,185)

 

 

(45,981)

 

 

(64,700)

 

Canceled

   

 

 

 —

 

 

 

     

Outstanding, December 31

 165,149 195,449 

 

 

214,168 

 

 

165,149 

 

     
     

Compensation expense for the year(1)

 $2,591,000 $1,809,000 

 

$

3,241,000 

 

$

2,591,000 

 

     
     

(1)

(1)

During 2013, we recorded $457,000 of compensation expense related to the accelerated vesting of 18,180 shares of restricted common stock due to the retirement of our former Senior Vice President, Marketing and Strategic Planning. At December 31, 2014, the total compensation cost related to unvested restricted stock granted is $4,195,000, which will be recognized ratably over the remaining vesting period.

76


Table of Contents

LTC PROPERTIES, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

Stock Options.    During 2014, we issued 15,000 options to purchase common stock due to the retirementat an exercise price of our former Senior Vice President, Marketing and Strategic Planning. At December 31, 2013, the total compensation cost related to unvested restricted$38.43 per share. These stock granted is $3,818,000, which will be recognizedoptions vest ratably over a three-year period. The fair value of these options was estimated utilizing the remaining vesting period.

        Stock Options.Black-Scholes-Merton valuation model and assumptions as of the grant date. In determining the estimated fair value, the expected life assumption was three years, the volatility was 0.21, the risk free interest rate was 0.66% and the expected dividend yield was 5.31%. The fair value of the option granted was estimated to be $2.96.  No stock options were issued during 2013 and 2012.2013. Nonqualified stock option activity for the years ended December 31, 20132014 and 2012,2013, was as follows:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Weighted Average

 


 Shares Weighted Average
Price
 

 

Shares

 

Price

 


 2013 2012 2013 2012 

 

2014

 

2013

 

2014

 

2013

 

Outstanding, January 1

 95,334 180,334 $23.93 $23.33 

    

73,334 

    

95,334 

    

$

23.97 

    

$

23.93 

 

Granted

   $ $ 

 

15,000 

 

 —

 

$

38.43 

 

$

 —

 

Exercised

 (22,000) (85,000)$23.79 $22.66 

 

(45,000)

 

(22,000)

 

$

23.79 

 

$

23.79 

 

Canceled

   $ $ 

 

 —

 

 —

 

$

 —

 

$

 —

 

         

Outstanding, December 31

 73,334 95,334 $23.97 $23.93 

 

43,334 

 

73,334 

 

$

29.16 

 

$

23.97 

 

         
         

Exercisable, December 31(1)

 73,334 95,334 $23.97 $23.93 

 

28,334 

 

73,334 

 

$

24.25 

 

$

23.97 

 

         
         

(1)
The aggregate intrinsic value of exercisable options at December 31, 2013, based upon the closing price of our common shares at December 31, 2013 the last trading day of 2013, amounted to approximately $838,000. Options exercisable at December 31, 2013 have a weighted average remaining contractual life of approximately 3 years.

(1)

The aggregate intrinsic value of exercisable options at December 31, 2014, based upon the closing price of our common shares at December 31, 2014 the last trading day of 2014, amounted to approximately $536,000. Options exercisable at December 31, 2014 have a weighted average remaining contractual life of approximately 2.7 years.

The options exercised during 20132014 and 20122013 were as follows:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    

 

    

Weighted

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Average

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Options

 

Exercise

 

Option

 

Market

 

 

 

Exercised

 

Price

 

Value

 

Value(1)

 

2014

 

45,000 

 

$

23.79 

 

$

1,071,000 

 

$

1,840,000 

 

2013

 

22,000 

 

$

23.79 

 

$

523,000 

 

$

865,000 

 


 
 Options
Exercised
 Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price
 Option
Value
 Market
Value(1)
 

2013

  22,000 $23.79 $523,000 $865,000 

2012

  85,000 $22.66 $1,926,000 $2,761,000 

(1)

As of the exercise dates.


(1)
As of the exercise dates.


LTC PROPERTIES, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

We use the Black-Scholes-MertonBlack‑Scholes‑Merton formula to estimate the value of stock options granted to employees. This model requires management to make certain estimates including stock volatility, expected dividend yield and the expected term.

 The weighted average exercise share price of the options was $29.16 and $23.97 and $23.93the weighted average remaining contractual life was 2.7 and 3.0 years as of December 31, 20132014 and 2012,2013, respectively. At December 31, 2013, all2014, the total number of stock options that are exercisablescheduled to vest through December 31, 2015, 2016 and 2017 is 5,000; 5,000 and 5,000, respectively.  We have no sharesstock options outstanding that are scheduled to vest beyond 2017. Compensation expense related to the vesting of stock options for the year ended December 31, 2014 was $12,000. We did not record compensation expense related to the vesting of stock options for the year ended December 31, 2013.  The remaining compensation expense to be recognized related to the future service period of unvested outstanding stock options for 2015, 2016 and 2017 is $15,000; $15,000 and $2,000, respectively.

11. Commitments and Contingencies

As part of an acquisition in 2011, we committed to provide a contingent payment if certain operational thresholds were met. The contingent payment was recorded at fair value, which was estimated using a discounted cash flow analysis, and we accreted the contingent liability to the settlement amount as of the estimated payment date. The

77


Table of Contents

LTC PROPERTIES, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

fair value of such contingent liability was re-evaluatedre‑evaluated on a quarterly basis based on changes in estimates of future operating results and changes in market discount rates. During 2013, we paid $7,000,000 related to thethis contingent liability. Accordingly, we havehad no remaining contingent liability under this agreement as of December 31, 2013. During 2013 and 2012, we recorded non-cash interest expense of $256,000 and $439,000, respectively, related to this contingent liability.

During 2014, we acquired a 48-unit assisted living property located in Colorado and added the property to an existing master lease. Under the amended master lease agreement, we committed to provide two contingent payments totaling up to $4,000,000 payable in increments of $2,000,000 upon the property achieving a sustainable stipulated rent coverage ratio. We estimated the fair value of the contingent liability. payment using a discounted cash flow analysis. This fair value measurement is based on significant input not observable in the market and thus represents a Level 3 measurement. These contingent payments were recorded at the date of the acquisition and master lease amendment in the amount of $3,240,000 and we are accreting the contingent liability up to the estimated settlement amount as of the estimated payment date. The fair value of these contingent liabilities will be evaluated on a quarterly basis based on changes in estimates of future operating results and changes in market discount rates. During 2014, we recorded non‑cash interest expense of $18,000 related to this contingent liabilities and the fair value of these contingent payments was $3,258,000 at December 31, 2014. See Note 6. Real Estate Investments for further discussion of the acquisition and master lease terms.

At December 31, 2012, the contingent liability had a carrying value of $6,744,000.

        At December 31, 2013,2014, we had outstanding commitments totaling $80,306,000$29,951,000 to develop, re-develop,re‑develop, renovate or expand senior housing and long term care properties. As of December 31, 2013,2014, we have funded $23,418,000$13,429,000 under these commitments and we have a remaining commitment of $56,888,000.$16,522,000. In January 2014,2015, we funded $8,828,000$731,000 under these investment commitments. Accordingly, we have a remaining commitment of $48,060,000. We also have a commitment to provide, under certain conditions, up to $5,000,000 per year through December 2014$15,791,000. Additionally, in January 2015, we committed to an existing operator under an amended master lease $600,000 for expansion of the 37 properties they lease from us.capital improvements at a  196-bed skilled nursing property in Texas.  SeeNote 6. Real Estate Investments for further discussion of these commitments.

        Additionally at December 31, 2013,In February 2015, we hadfunded $7,195,000 under a $10,600,000 mortgage$12,179,000 development commitment to purchase and complete the development of a 56-unit memory care property currently under construction in Texas. In conjunction with this commitment, we entered into a master lease agreement which provides us a right to provide similar financing for certain future development opportunities and provides the operator lease inducement payments for each development commitment.  In February 2015, we elected to exercise our right to provide financing for one such opportunity, adding to the master lease a parcel of land purchased in South Carolina for $2,490,000 coupled with our commitment to provide the operator with up to $16,535,000, including the land purchase, for the development of an 89-unit combination assisted living and memory care property. See Note 6. Real Estate Investments for further discussion of this master lease.

As of December 31, 2013,2014, we funded $7,590,000had invested $3,337,000 under a $12,000,000 capital improvements commitment to Prestige under a mortgage loan and invested an additional $770,000 under this capital improvement commitment andin January 2015.  Also, in January 2015, we amended this mortgage loan to provide an additional $20,000,000 commitment for redevelopment projects at two of the properties securing the loan increasing the total capital improvement commitment to $32,000,000. As a result, we have a remaining capital improvement commitment of $3,010,000. In 2013, we funded a $124,387,000 mortgage loan and committed to provide an additional $12,000,000 for capital improvements and,$27,893,000.  Additionally, under certain conditions and based on certain operating metrics and valuation thresholds achieved and sustained within the firstinitial twelve years of the term, the loan provides for additional loan proceeds ofcommitment up to $40,000,000. As$40,000,000 of December 31, 2013, thereadditional proceeds (not to exceed $10,000,000 in any twelve month period). Since these conditions have not been met, no funding has been no fundingmade under eitherthis additional $40,000,000 loan commitment. In January 2015, we originated an $11,000,000 mortgage loan with this borrower. Concurrent with the loan origination, we funded $9,500,000 under this loan and have a remaining commitment of these commitments.$1,500,000.  SeeNote 6. Real Estate Investments for further discussion of these mortgage loans.

78


Table of Contents

LTC PROPERTIES, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

At December 31, 2013,2014, we committed to provide $2,425,000$3,788,000 in loans and line of credit agreements. As of December 31, 2013,2014, we had funded $595,000$1,442,000 under these commitments and we have a remaining commitment of $1,830,000.$2,346,000.  In January 2015, we funded $500,000 under these loans and line of credit agreements. Also, in January 2015, we committed to fund a working capital loan of $500,000 to an existing operator. Accordingly, we have commitments of $4,288,000 and a remaining commitment of $2,346,000.  SeeNote 7. Notes Receivables for further discussion of these commitments.

12.   Transactions with Related Party

We have directly entered into one transaction with Skilled Healthcare Group, Inc. (or SHG). Oneare a party from time to time to various general and professional liability claims and lawsuits asserted against the lessees or borrowers of our directors, Boyd W. Hendrickson, served as Chief Executive Officer of SHG until his retirement on November 20, 2013.

        In December 2005, we purchased, on the open market, $10,000,000 face value of SHG Senior Subordinated Notes with a face rate of 11.0% and an effective yield of 11.1%. Our Board of Directors, with Mr. Hendrickson abstaining, ratified the purchase of SHG Senior Subordinated Notes. As a result



LTC PROPERTIES, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

of an early redemption by SHGproperties, which in 2007, we had a remaining investment in $6,500,000 face value of SHG Senior Subordinated Notes at December 31, 2011. During 2012, SHG redeemed all of their outstanding Senior Subordinated Notes at par value plus accrued and unpaid interest up to the redemption date. During 2012 and 2011, we recognized $235,000 and $721,000 of interest income related to the SHG Senior Subordinated Notes.

        In addition, during September 2007 SHG purchased the assets of Laurel Healthcare (or Laurel). We wereour opinion are not a direct party to this transaction. One of the assets SHG purchased was Laurel's leasehold interestssingularly or in the skilled nursing properties in New Mexico Laurel leased from usaggregate material to our results of operations or financial condition. These types of claims and lawsuits may include matters involving general or professional liability, which we believe under a 15-year master lease agreement dated in February 2006. Our Board of Directors, with Mr. Hendrickson abstaining, ratifiedapplicable legal principles are not our consent to the assignment of Laurel's master lease to subsidiaries of SHG. The economic terms of the master lease agreement did not changeresponsibility as a resultnon-possessory landlord or mortgage holder. We believe that these matters are the responsibility of our assignment oflessees and borrowers pursuant to general legal principals and pursuant to insurance and indemnification provisions in the master leaseapplicable leases or mortgages. We intend to subsidiaries of SHG. During 2013, 2012 and 2011, we received $4,479,000, $4,370,000 and $4,264,000, respectively, in rental income and recorded $22,000, $131,000 and $238,000, respectively, in straight-line rental income from subsidiaries of SHG. At December 31, 2013 and 2012, the straight-line rent receivable from subsidiaries of SHG was $3,213,000 and $3,191,000, respectively.continue to vigorously defend such claims.

13.12. Distributions

We must distribute at least 90% of our taxable income in order to continue to qualify as a REIT. This distribution requirement can be satisfied by current year distributions or, to a certain extent, by distributions in the following year.

For federal tax purposes, distributions to stockholders are treated as ordinary income, capital gains, return of capital or a combination thereof. Distributions for 2014, 2013 2012 and 20112012 were cash distributions. The federal income tax classification of the per share common stock distributions are as follows (unaudited):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

 

 

2014

 

2013

 

2012

 

Ordinary taxable distribution

    

$

1.474 

    

$

1.534 

    

$

1.539 

 

Return of capital

 

 

0.196 

 

 

0.313 

 

 

0.242 

 

Unrecaptured Section 1250 gain

 

 

0.370 

 

 

0.058 

 

 

0.004 

 

Long term capital gain

 

 

 —

 

 

— 

 

 

0.005 

 

Total

 

$

2.040 

 

$

1.905 

 

$

1.790 

 

79


 
 Year Ended December 31, 
 
 2013 2012 2011 

Ordinary taxable distribution

 $1.534 $1.539 $1.370 

Return of capital

  0.313  0.242  0.295 

Unrecaptured Section 1250 gain

  0.058  0.004   

Long term capital gain

    0.005  0.015 
        

Total

 $1.905 $1.790 $1.680 
        
        

Table of Contents


LTC PROPERTIES, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

14.

13. Net Income Per Common Share

Basic and diluted net income per share was as follows(in thousands except per share amounts):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

For the year ended December 31,

 

 

 

2014

 

2013

 

2012

 

Income from continuing operations

    

$

73,399 

    

$

55,405 

    

$

50,306 

 

Less net income allocated to non-controlling interests

 

 

 —

 

 

 

 

(37)

 

Less net income allocated to participating securities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Non-forfeitable dividends on participating securities

 

 

(465)

 

 

(381)

 

 

(377)

 

Income allocated to participating securities

 

 

(16)

 

 

(2)

 

 

 

Total net income allocated to participating securities

 

 

(481)

 

 

(383)

 

 

(377)

 

Less net income allocated to preferred stockholders:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Preferred stock dividends

 

 

(3,273)

 

 

(3,273)

 

 

(3,273)

 

Total net income allocated to preferred stockholders

 

 

(3,273)

 

 

(3,273)

 

 

(3,273)

 

Income from continuing operations available to common stockholders

 

 

69,645 

 

 

51,749 

 

 

46,619 

 

Discontinued operations:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Income from discontinued operations

 

 

 —

 

 

805 

 

 

1,005 

 

Gain on sale of assets, net

 

 

 —

 

 

1,605 

 

 

16 

 

Total net income from discontinued operations

 

 

 —

 

 

2,410 

 

 

1,021 

 

Net income available to common stockholders

 

 

69,645 

 

 

54,159 

 

 

47,640 

 

Effect of dilutive securities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Convertible preferred securities

 

 

3,273 

 

 

 

 

 

Total effect of dilutive securities

 

 

3,273 

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

Net income for diluted net income per share

 

$

72,918 

 

$

54,159 

 

$

47,640 

 

Shares for basic net income per share

 

 

34,617 

 

 

33,111 

 

 

30,238 

 

Effect of dilutive securities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Stock options

 

 

23 

 

 

31 

 

 

40 

 

Convertible preferred securities

 

 

2,000 

 

 

 

 

 

Total effect of dilutive securities

 

 

2,023 

 

 

31 

 

 

40 

 

Shares for diluted net income per share

 

 

36,640 

 

 

33,142 

 

 

30,278 

 

Basic net income per share

 

$

2.01 

 

$

1.64 

 

$

1.58 

 

Diluted net income per share(1)

 

$

1.99 

 

$

1.63 

 

$

1.57 

 


(1)

For the year ended December 31, 2013, the Series C Cumulative Convertible Preferred Stock was excluded from the computation of diluted net income per share as such inclusion would be anti‑dilutive. For the year ended December 31, 2012, the Series C Cumulative Convertible Preferred Stock and the convertible non‑controlling interests have been excluded from the computation of diluted net income per share as such inclusion would be anti‑dilutive.

 
 For the year ended December 31, 
 
 2013 2012 2011 

Income from continuing operations

 $55,405 $50,306 $48,620 

Less net income allocated to non-controlling interests

    (37) (191)

Less net income allocated to participating securities:

          

Non-forfeitable dividends on participating securities

  (381) (377) (342)

Income allocated to participating securities

  (2)    
        

Total net income allocated to participating securities

  (383) (377) (342)

Less net income allocated to preferred stockholders:

          

Preferred stock dividends

  (3,273) (3,273) (5,512)

Preferred stock redemption charge

      (3,566)
        

Total net income allocated to preferred stockholders

  (3,273) (3,273) (9,078)
        

Income from continuing operations available to common stockholders

  51,749  46,619  39,009 

Discontinued operations:

          

Income from discontinued operations

  805  1,005  823 

Gain on sale of assets, net

  1,605  16   
        

Total net income from discontinued operations

  2,410  1,021  823 
        

Net income available to common stockholders

  54,159  47,640  39,832 

Effect of dilutive securities:

          

Convertible preferred securities

       
        

Total effect of dilutive securities

       
        

Net income for diluted net income per share

 $54,159 $47,640 $39,832 
        
        

Shares for basic net income per share

  33,111  30,238  29,194 

Effect of dilutive securities:

          

Stock options

  31  40  28 

Convertible preferred securities

       
        

Total effect of dilutive securities

  31  40  28 
        

Shares for diluted net income per share

  33,142  30,278  29,222 
        
        

Basic net income per share

 $1.64 $1.58 $1.36 
        
        

Diluted net income per share(1)

 $1.63 $1.57 $1.36 
        
        

80


(1)
For each year, the Series C Cumulative Convertible Preferred Stock, the participating securities and the convertible non-controlling interests have been excluded from the computation

Table of diluted net income per share as such inclusion would be anti-dilutive.


Contents


LTC PROPERTIES, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

15.

14. Quarterly Financial Information

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

For the quarter ended

 

 

 

March 31,

 

June 30,

 

September 30,

 

December 31,

 

 

 

(unaudited, in thousands except per share amounts)

 

2014

    

 

    

    

 

    

    

 

    

    

 

    

 

Revenues

 

$

29,438 

 

$

29,227 

 

$

29,541 

 

$

30,755 

 

Net income from discontinued operations

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

Net income available to common stockholders

 

 

16,083 

 

 

17,338 

 

 

16,181 

 

 

20,043 

 

Net income per common share from continuing operations available to common stockholders:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Basic

 

$

0.47 

 

$

0.50 

 

$

0.47 

 

$

0.58 

 

Diluted

 

$

0.46 

 

$

0.50 

 

$

0.46 

 

$

0.57 

 

Net income (loss) per common share from discontinued operations:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Basic

 

$

 —

 

$

 —

 

$

 —

 

$

 —

 

Diluted

 

$

 —

 

$

 —

 

$

 —

 

$

 —

 

Net income per common share available to common stockholders:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Basic

 

$

0.47 

 

$

0.50 

 

$

0.47 

 

$

0.58 

 

Diluted

 

$

0.46 

 

$

0.50 

 

$

0.46 

 

$

0.57 

 

Dividends per share declared

 

$

0.510 

 

$

0.510 

 

$

0.510 

 

$

0.510 

 

Dividend per share paid

 

$

0.510 

 

$

0.510 

 

$

0.510 

 

$

0.510 

 

2013

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Revenues

 

$

25,277 

 

$

25,279 

 

$

25,825 

 

$

28,593 

 

Net income (loss) from discontinued operations

 

 

254 

 

 

(701)

 

 

2,857 

 

 

 —

 

Net income available to common stockholders

 

 

12,060 

 

 

11,994 

 

 

16,373 

 

 

13,732 

 

Net income per common share from continuing operations available to common stockholders:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Basic

 

$

0.39 

 

$

0.39 

 

$

0.39 

 

$

0.40 

 

Diluted

 

$

0.39 

 

$

0.39 

 

$

0.39 

 

$

0.40 

 

Net income (loss) per common share from discontinued operations:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Basic

 

$

0.01 

 

$

(0.02)

 

$

0.08 

 

$

 —

 

Diluted

 

$

0.01 

 

$

(0.02)

 

$

0.08 

 

$

 —

 

Net income per common share available to common stockholders:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Basic

 

$

0.40 

 

$

0.36 

 

$

0.47 

 

$

0.40 

 

Diluted

 

$

0.40 

 

$

0.36 

 

$

0.47 

 

$

0.40 

 

Dividends per share declared

 

$

0.465 

 

$

0.465 

 

$

0.465 

 

$

0.510 

 

Dividend per share paid

 

$

0.465 

 

$

0.465 

 

$

0.465 

 

$

0.510 

 


NOTE:

Quarterly and year‑to‑date computations of per share amounts are made independently. Therefore, the sum of per share amounts for the quarters may not agree with the per share amounts for the year. Computations of per share amounts from continuing operations, discontinued operations and net income (loss) are made independently. Therefore, the sum of per share amounts from continuing operations and discontinued operations may not agree with the per share amounts from net income (loss) available to common stockholders.

81


 
 For the quarter ended 
 
 March 31, June 30, September 30, December 31, 
 
 (unaudited, in thousands except per share amounts)
 

2013

             

Revenues

 $25,277 $25,279 $25,825 $28,593 

Net income (loss) from discontinued operations

  254  (701) 2,857   

Net income available to common stockholders

  12,060  11,994  16,373  13,732 

Net income per common share from continuing operations available to common stockholders:

             

Basic

 $0.39 $0.39 $0.39 $0.40 

Diluted

 $0.39 $0.39 $0.39 $0.40 

Net income (loss) per common share from discontinued operations:

             

Basic

 $0.01 $(0.02)$0.08 $0.00 

Diluted

 $0.01 $(0.02)$0.08 $0.00 

Net income per common share available to common stockholders:

             

Basic

 $0.40 $0.36 $0.47 $0.40 

Diluted

 $0.40 $0.36 $0.47 $0.40 

Dividends per share declared

 $0.465 $0.465 $0.465 $0.510 

Dividend per share paid

 $0.465 $0.465 $0.465 $0.510 

2012

  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
 

Revenues

 $22,251 $22,704 $23,402 $24,125 

Net income from discontinued operations

  263  251  253  254 

Net income available to common stockholders

  12,009  12,194  11,583  11,854 

Net income per common share from continuing operations available to common stockholders:

             

Basic

 $0.39 $0.40 $0.37 $0.38 

Diluted

 $0.39 $0.39 $0.37 $0.38 

Net income per common share from discontinued operations:

             

Basic

 $0.01 $0.01 $0.01 $0.01 

Diluted

 $0.01 $0.01 $0.01 $0.01 

Net income per common share available to common stockholders:

             

Basic

 $0.40 $0.40 $0.38 $0.39 

Diluted

 $0.40 $0.40 $0.38 $0.39 

Dividends per share declared

 $0.435 $0.435 $0.455 $0.465 

Dividend per share paid

 $0.435 $0.435 $0.455 $0.465 


Contents


LTC PROPERTIES, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

16.

15. Fair Value Measurements

In accordance with the accounting guidance regarding the fair value option for financial assets and financial liabilities, entities are permitted to choose to measure certain financial assets and liabilities at fair value, with the change in unrealized gains and losses reported in earnings. We did not adopt the elective fair market value option for our financial assets and financial liabilities.

The carrying amount of cash and cash equivalents approximates fair value because of the short-termshort‑term maturity of these instruments. We do not invest our cash in auction rate securities. The carrying value and fair value of our financial instruments as of December 31, 20132014 and 20122013 assuming election of fair value for our financial assets and financial liabilities were as follows (in thousands):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

At December 31, 2014

 

At December 31, 2013

 


 At December 31, 2013 At December 31, 2012 

 

Carrying

 

 

 

 

Carrying

 

 

 

 


 Carrying
Value
 Fair Value Carrying
Value
 Fair Value 

 

Value

 

Fair Value

 

Value

 

Fair Value

 

Mortgage loans receivable

 $165,444 $200,248(1)$39,299 $44,939(1)

    

$

165,656 

    

$

198,977 

(1)

$

165,444 

    

$

200,248 

(1)

Bonds payable

 2,035 2,035(2) 2,635 2,635(2)

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

2,035 

 

 

2,035 

(2)

Bank borrowings

 21,000 21,000(2) 115,500 115,500(2)

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

21,000 

 

 

21,000 

(2)

Senior unsecured notes

 255,800 262,351(3) 185,800 194,838(3)

 

 

281,633 

 

 

283,933 

(3)

 

255,800 

 

 

262,351 

(3)

Contingent liabilities

   6,744 6,744(4)

 

 

3,258 

 

 

3,258 

(4)

 

— 

 

 

— 

(4)


(1)

Our investment in mortgage loans receivable is classified as Level 3. The fair value is determined using a widely accepted valuation technique, discounted cash flow analysis on the expected cash flows. The discount rate is determined using our assumption on market conditions adjusted for market and credit risk and current returns on our investments. The discount rate used to value our future cash inflows of the mortgage loans receivable at December 31, 2014 and 2013 was 8.6% and 8.4%, respectively.

(1)
Our investment in mortgage loans receivable is classified as Level 3. The fair value is determined using a widely accepted valuation technique, discounted cash flow analysis on the expected cash flows. The discount rate is determined using our assumption on market conditions adjusted for market and credit risk and current returns on our investments. The discount rate used to value our future cash inflows of the mortgage loans receivable at December 31, 2013 and 2012 was 8.4% and 6.0%, respectively.
(2)
Our bonds payable and bank borrowings are at a variable interest rate. The estimated fair value of our bonds payable and bank borrowings approximated their carrying values at December 31, 2013 and 2012 based upon prevailing market interest rates for similar debt arrangements.
(3)
Our obligation under our senior unsecured notes is classified as Level 3 and thus the fair value is determined using a widely accepted valuation technique, discounted cash flow analysis on the expected cash flows. The discount rate is measured based upon management's estimates of rates currently prevailing for comparable loans available to us, and instruments of comparable maturities. At December 31, 2013, the discount rate used to value our future cash outflow of our senior unsecured notes was 3.95% for those maturing before year 2020 and 4.25% for those maturing beyond year 2020. At December 31, 2012, the discount rate used to value our future cash outflow of our senior unsecured notes was 3.8% for those maturing before year 2020 and 4.3% for those maturing beyond year 2020.
(4)
Our contingent obligation under the earn-out liabilities is classified as Level 3. We estimated the fair value of the contingent earn-out payments using a discounted cash flow analysis. The discount rate that we use consists of a risk-free U.S. Treasury rate plus a company specific credit spread which we believe is acceptable by willing market participants. At December 31, 2012, the discount rate used to value our future cash outflow of the earn-out liability was 6.6%.

(2)

Our bonds payable and bank borrowings are at a variable interest rate. The estimated fair value of our bonds payable and bank borrowings approximated their carrying values at December 31, 2014 and 2013 based upon prevailing market interest rates for similar debt arrangements.

(3)

Our obligation under our senior unsecured notes is classified as Level 3 and thus the fair value is determined using a widely accepted valuation technique, discounted cash flow analysis on the expected cash flows. The discount rate is measured based upon management’s estimates of rates currently prevailing for comparable loans available to us, and instruments of comparable maturities. At December 31, 2014, the discount rate used to value our future cash outflow of our senior unsecured notes was 3.80% for those maturing before year 2020 and 4.55% for those maturing beyond year 2020. At December 31, 2013, the discount rate used to value our future cash outflow of our senior unsecured notes was 3.95% for those maturing before year 2020 and 4.25% for those maturing beyond year 2020.

(4)

Our contingent obligation under the earn‑out liabilities is classified as Level 3. We estimated the fair value of the contingent earn‑out payments using a discounted cash flow analysis. The discount rate that we use consists of a risk‑free U.S. Treasury rate plus a company specific credit spread which we believe is acceptable by willing market participants. At December 31, 2014, the discount rate used to value our future cash outflow of the earn-out liability was 6.2%.

17.

16. Subsequent Events

We had the following events occur subsequent to the balance sheet date.

Real Estate—Owned Properties:    We entered into a master lease agreement and committed to provide development commitments totaling $28,715,000. Under these development commitments, we purchased land and existing improvements for the purpose of completing a 56-unit memory care property currently under construction for $7,195,000 and land for the purpose of building an 89-unit combination assisted living and memory care property for $2,490,000.  The master lease also provides for the payment of lease inducements of up to $3,952,000 which will be

82


Table of Contents

LTC PROPERTIES, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

amortized as a yield adjustment over the lease term. We funded $8,828,000$4,711,000 under completed development, expansion and renovation commitments.  Additionally, we funded $731,000 under ongoing real estate investment commitments. Accordingly,investments with remaining commitments of $15,791,000. See Note 6. Real Estate Investments for further discussion.

Real Estate—Mortgage Loans:    We originated an $11,000,000 mortgage loan secured by a 157-bed skilled nursing property in Michigan and funded $9,500,000 under this loan. We also purchased and equipped a newly constructed 106-bed replacement skilled nursing property for a total of $13,946,000 by exercising our purchase option under a $10,600,000 mortgage and construction loan. Additionally, we amended a mortgage loan secured by 15 skilled nursing properties with a total of 2,058 beds in Michigan to provide an additional $20,000,000 in loan proceeds for the redevelopment of two properties securing the loan. Concurrent with the loan amendment, the borrower forfeited their option to repay up to 50% of the outstanding loan balance and we agreed to convey two parcels of land held-for-use adjacent to the two properties to facilitate the expansion and renovation projects. We funded $770,000 under a $12,000,000 capital improvement commitment to an existing borrower and have a remaining commitment of $48,060,000.$7,893,000.  We received $2,285,000 plus accrued interest for the payoff of a mortgage loan secured by one range of care property. SeeNote 6. Real Estate Investments for further discussion on the commitments.

        Major Operator:    We will not be renewing the leases expiring on December 31, 2014 with Extendicare and ALC. We have begun a formal process to re-lease the 37 assisted living properties they lease from us. SeeNote 3. Major Operator for further discussion.



LTC PROPERTIES, INC.
Notes Receivable:
In January 2015, we committed to fund a $500,000 working capital loan with interest at 6.5% maturing in February 2019. We also advanced $500,000 of principal under our note commitments. See Note 7. Notes Receivable for further discussion.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)Major Operator:    Our master leases with Extendicare and Enlivant expired on December 31, 2014. Effective January 1, 2015, we re-leased 20 assisted living properties to two separate operators. See Note 3. Major Operator for further discussion.

Debt:    In January 2014, weWe borrowed $11,500,000$18,000,000 under our unsecured revolving line of credit. Accordingly, we have $207,500,000$18,000,000 outstanding and $382,000,000 available for borrowing.

Commitments and Contingencies: We committed to an existing operator under an amended master lease $600,000 for capital improvements at a 196-bed skilled nursing property in Texas. See Note 6. Real Estate Investments for further discussion. 

Equity:  We declared a monthly cash dividend of $0.17 per share on our common stock for the months of January, February and March 2014,2015, payable on January 31,30, February 28,27, and March 31, 2014,2015, respectively, to stockholders of record on January 23,22, February 20,19, and March 21, 2014,23, 2015, respectively. We acquired 4,609 shares of common stock held by employees who tendered owned shares to satisfy tax withholding obligations and we cancelled 640 shares of restricted stock. Additionally, we granted 59,00065,750 shares of restricted common stock at $36.81$44.45 per share. These shares vest ratably from the grant date over a three-year period from the grant date.period.


83



LTC PROPERTIES, INC.

SCHEDULE II

VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS

(in thousands)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Additions

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(Recovered)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Balance at

 

charged to

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

beginning of

 

costs and

 

Charged to

 

 

 

 

Balance at end

 

Account Description

 

period(2)

 

expenses

 

other accounts

 

Deductions(1)

 

of period(2)

 

Year ended December 31, 2012

    

 

    

    

 

    

    

 

    

    

 

    

    

 

    

 

Loan loss reserves

 

$

921 

 

$

(139)

 

$

— 

 

$

— 

 

$

782 

 

Straight-line rent receivable allowance

 

 

1,519 

 

 

38 

 

 

— 

 

 

— 

 

 

1,557 

 

 

 

$

2,440 

 

$

(101)

 

$

— 

 

$

— 

 

$

2,339 

 

Year ended December 31, 2013

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Loan loss reserves

 

$

782 

 

$

1,274 

 

$

— 

 

$

(385)

 

$

1,671 

 

Straight-line rent receivable allowance

 

 

1,557 

 

 

906 

(3)

 

— 

 

 

(922)

(3)

 

1,541 

 

 

 

$

2,339 

 

$

2,180 

 

$

— 

 

$

(1,307)

 

$

3,212 

 

Year ended December 31, 2014

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Loan loss reserves

 

$

1,671 

 

$

 

$

— 

 

$

— 

 

$

1,673 

 

Straight-line rent receivable allowance

 

 

1,541 

 

 

30 

 

 

— 

 

 

(840)

(4)

 

731 

 

 

 

$

3,212 

 

$

32 

 

$

— 

 

$

(840)

 

$

2,404 

 


(1)

Deductions represent uncollectible accounts written off.

(2)

Includes straight‑line rent receivable allowance for properties classified as held‑for‑sale.

(3)

Includes the write‑off of an $878 straight‑line rent receivable balance relatedto the transition of four assisted living properties to a new lessee.

(4)

Includes the write-off of an $840 straight-line rent receivable balance related to the amendment of an existing lease.

84


 
  
 Additions  
  
 
Account Description
 Balance at
beginning of
period(2)
 (Recovered)
charged to
costs and
expenses
 Charged to
other accounts
 Deductions(1) Balance at end
of period(2)
 

Year ended December 31, 2011

                

Allowance for doubtful accounts and other receivables          

 $981 $(60)$ $ $921 

Straight-line rent receivable allowance

  1,473  46      1,519 
            

 $2,454 $(14)$ $ $2,440 
            
            

Year ended December 31, 2012

  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
 

Allowance for doubtful accounts and other receivables          

 $921 $(139)$ $ $782 

Straight-line rent receivable allowance

  1,519  38      1,557 
            

 $2,440 $(101)$ $ $2,339 
            
            

Year ended December 31, 2013

  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
 

Allowance for doubtful accounts and other receivables          

 $782 $1,274 $ $(385)$1,671 

Straight-line rent receivable allowance

  1,557  906(3)   (922)(3) 1,541 
            

 $2,339 $2,180 $ $(1,307)$3,212 
            
            

(1)
Deductions represent uncollectible accounts written off.
(2)
Includes straight-line rent receivable allowance for properties classified as held-for-sale.
(3)
Includes the write-off

Table of an $878 straight-line rent receivable balance related to the transition of four assisted living properties to a new lessee.


Contents


LTC PROPERTIES, INC.

SCHEDULE III

REAL ESTATE AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION

(in thousands)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Costs

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

capitalized

 

Gross amount at which carried at

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Initial cost to company

 

subsequent

 

December 31, 2014

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Building and

 

to

 

 

 

 

Building and

 

 

 

 

Accum

 

Construction/

 

Acquisition

 

 

 

Encumbrances

 

Land

 

improvement

 

acquisition

 

Land

 

improvement

 

Total(1)

 

deprec.

 

renovation date

 

date

 

Skilled Nursing Properties:

    

 

    

    

 

    

    

 

    

    

 

    

    

 

    

    

 

    

    

 

    

    

 

    

    

    

    

    

 

134 Alamogordo, NM

  

$

  

$

210 

  

$

2,593 

  

$

539 

  

$

210 

  

$

3,132 

  

$

3,342 

  

$

908 

  

1985 

  

2001 

 

218 Albuquerque, NM

 

 

 

 

1,696 

 

 

3,891 

 

 

530 

 

 

1,696 

 

 

4,421 

 

 

6,117 

 

 

1,390 

 

2008 

 

2005 

 

219 Albuquerque, NM

 

 

 

 

1,950 

 

 

8,910 

 

 

207 

 

 

1,950 

 

 

9,117 

 

 

11,067 

 

 

2,828 

 

1982 

 

2005 

 

220 Albuquerque, NM

 

 

 

 

2,463 

 

 

7,647 

 

 

 

 

2,463 

 

 

7,656 

 

 

10,119 

 

 

2,373 

 

1970 

 

2005 

 

042 Altoona, IA

 

 

 

 

105 

 

 

2,309 

 

 

444 

 

 

105 

 

 

2,753 

 

 

2,858 

 

 

1,652 

 

1973 

 

1996 

 

252 Amarillo, TX

 

 

 

 

844 

 

 

 —

 

 

7,925 

 

 

844 

 

 

7,925 

 

 

8,769 

 

 

558 

 

2013 

 

2011 

 

214 Aransas Pass, TX

 

 

 

 

154 

 

 

1,276 

 

 

589 

 

 

154 

 

 

1,865 

 

 

2,019 

 

 

676 

 

2008 

 

2004 

 

247 Arlington, TX

 

 

 

 

1,016 

 

 

13,649 

 

 

 —

 

 

1,016 

 

 

13,649 

 

 

14,665 

 

 

1,938 

 

2007 

 

2011 

 

171 Atlanta, GA

 

 

 

 

175 

 

 

1,282 

 

 

 

 

175 

 

 

1,285 

 

 

1,460 

 

 

679 

 

1968 

 

1999 

 

040 Atmore, AL

 

 

 

 

131 

 

 

2,877 

 

 

196 

 

 

131 

 

 

3,073 

 

 

3,204 

 

 

1,677 

 

1974 

 

1996 

 

221 Beaumont, TX

 

 

 

 

370 

 

 

1,141 

 

 

93 

 

 

370 

 

 

1,234 

 

 

1,604 

 

 

436 

 

1950 

 

2005 

 

213 Beeville, TX

 

 

 

 

186 

 

 

1,197 

 

 

70 

 

 

186 

 

 

1,267 

 

 

1,453 

 

 

373 

 

1974 

 

2004 

 

215 Benbrook, TX

 

 

 

 

480 

 

 

2,121 

 

 

102 

 

 

480 

 

 

2,223 

 

 

2,703 

 

 

749 

 

1976 

 

2005 

 

007 Bradenton, FL

 

 

 

 

330 

 

 

2,720 

 

 

160 

 

 

330 

 

 

2,880 

 

 

3,210 

 

 

1,801 

 

2002 

 

1993 

 

256 Brownwood, TX

 

 

 

 

164 

 

 

6,336 

 

 

 —

 

 

164 

 

 

6,336 

 

 

6,500 

 

 

521 

 

2011 

 

2012 

 

043 Carroll, IA

 

 

 

 

47 

 

 

1,033 

 

 

213 

 

 

47 

 

 

1,246 

 

 

1,293 

 

 

746 

 

1969 

 

1996 

 

177 Chesapeake, VA

 

 

 

 

388 

 

 

3,469 

 

 

1,097 

 

 

388 

 

 

4,566 

 

 

4,954 

 

 

2,785 

 

2007 

 

1995 

 

257 Cincinnati, OH

 

 

 

 

1,890 

 

 

25,110 

 

 

 —

 

 

1,890 

 

 

25,110 

 

 

27,000 

 

 

1,391 

 

2009 

 

2012 

 

125 Clovis, NM

 

 

 

 

561 

 

 

5,539 

 

 

307 

 

 

561 

 

 

5,846 

 

 

6,407 

 

 

2,022 

 

2006 

 

2001 

 

129 Clovis, NM

 

 

 

 

598 

 

 

5,902 

 

 

59 

 

 

598 

 

 

5,961 

 

 

6,559 

 

 

2,088 

 

1995 

 

2001 

 

268 Coldspring, KY

 

 

 

 

 

2,050 

 

 

19,665 

 

 

 —

 

 

2,050 

 

 

19,665 

 

 

21,715 

 

 

146 

 

N/A

 

2012 

 

253 Colton, CA

 

 

 

 

2,342 

 

 

15,158 

 

 

 —

 

 

2,342 

 

 

15,158 

 

 

17,500 

 

 

1,361 

 

1990 

 

2011 

 

211 Commerce City, CO

 

 

 

 

236 

 

 

3,217 

 

 

167 

 

 

236 

 

 

3,384 

 

 

3,620 

 

 

1,223 

 

1964 

 

2004 

 

212 Commerce City, CO

 

 

 

 

161 

 

 

2,160 

 

 

95 

 

 

161 

 

 

2,255 

 

 

2,416 

 

 

790 

 

1967 

 

2004 

 

246 Crowley, TX

 

 

 

 

2,247 

 

 

14,276 

 

 

 —

 

 

2,247 

 

 

14,276 

 

 

16,523 

 

 

1,900 

 

2007 

 

2011 

 

235 Daleville, VA

 

 

 

 

279 

 

 

8,382 

 

 

 —

 

 

279 

 

 

8,382 

 

 

8,661 

 

 

1,389 

 

2005 

 

2010 

 

258 Dayton, OH

 

 

 

 

373 

 

 

26,627 

 

 

 —

 

 

373 

 

 

26,627 

 

 

27,000 

 

 

1,486 

 

2010 

 

2012 

 

196 Dresden, TN

 

 

 

 

31 

 

 

1,529 

 

 

1,066 

 

 

31 

 

 

2,595 

 

 

2,626 

 

 

697 

 

2002 

 

2000 

 

185 Gardner, KS

 

 

 

 

896 

 

 

4,478 

 

 

4,150 

 

 

896 

 

 

8,628 

 

 

9,524 

 

 

2,909 

 

2011 

 

1999 

 

248 Granbury, TX

 

 

 

 

836 

 

 

6,693 

 

 

 —

 

 

836 

 

 

6,693 

 

 

7,529 

 

 

1,323 

 

2008 

 

2011 

 

044 Granger, IA

 

 

 

 

62 

 

 

1,356 

 

 

221 

 

 

62 

 

 

1,577 

 

 

1,639 

 

 

907 

 

1979 

 

1996 

 

205 Grapevine, TX

 

 

 

 

431 

 

 

1,449 

 

 

188 

 

 

431 

 

 

1,637 

 

 

2,068 

 

 

785 

 

1974 

 

2002 

 

172 Griffin, GA

 

 

 

 

500 

 

 

2,900 

 

 

 —

 

 

500 

 

 

2,900 

 

 

3,400 

 

 

1,409 

 

1969 

 

1999 

 

250 Hewitt, TX

 

 

 

 

1,780 

 

 

8,220 

 

 

99 

 

 

1,780 

 

 

8,319 

 

 

10,099 

 

 

832 

 

2008 

 

2011 

 

054 Houston, TX

 

 

 

 

202 

 

 

4,458 

 

 

1,426 

 

 

202 

 

 

5,884 

 

 

6,086 

 

 

3,389 

 

2007 

 

1996 

 

051 Houston, TX

 

 

 

 

365 

 

 

3,769 

 

 

1,598 

 

 

365 

 

 

5,367 

 

 

5,732 

 

 

3,006 

 

1968 

 

1996 

 

055 Houston, TX

 

 

 

 

202 

 

 

4,458 

 

 

1,359 

 

 

202 

 

 

5,817 

 

 

6,019 

 

 

3,282 

 

2008 

 

1996 

 

208 Jacksonville, FL

 

 

 

 

486 

 

 

1,981 

 

 

30 

 

 

486 

 

 

2,011 

 

 

2,497 

 

 

808 

 

1987 

 

2002 

 

045 Jefferson, IA

 

 

 

 

86 

 

 

1,883 

 

 

296 

 

 

86 

 

 

2,179 

 

 

2,265 

 

 

1,231 

 

1972 

 

1996 

 

008 Lecanto, FL

 

 

 

 

351 

 

 

2,665 

 

 

2,737 

 

 

351 

 

 

5,402 

 

 

5,753 

 

 

3,181 

 

2006 

 

1993 

 

053 Mesa, AZ

 

 

 

 

305 

 

 

6,909 

 

 

1,876 

 

 

305 

 

 

8,785 

 

 

9,090 

 

 

4,653 

 

1996 

 

1996 

 

226 Mesa, AZ

 

 

 

 

1,095 

 

 

2,330 

 

 

 —

 

 

1,095 

 

 

2,330 

 

 

3,425 

 

 

688 

 

1979 

 

2006 

 

050 Midland, TX

 

 

 

 

33 

 

 

2,285 

 

 

26 

 

 

33 

 

 

2,311 

 

 

2,344 

 

 

1,318 

 

1973 

 

1996 

 

242 Mission, TX

 

 

 

 

1,111 

 

 

16,602 

 

 

 —

 

 

1,111 

 

 

16,602 

 

 

17,713 

 

 

2,022 

 

2004 

 

2010 

 

041 Montgomery, AL

 

 

 

 

242 

 

 

5,327 

 

 

115 

 

 

242 

 

 

5,442 

 

 

5,684 

 

 

3,036 

 

1974 

 

1996 

 

115 Nacogdoches, TX

 

 

 

 

100 

 

 

1,738 

 

 

168 

 

 

100 

 

 

1,906 

 

 

2,006 

 

 

1,005 

 

1973 

 

1997 

 

233 Nacogdoches, TX

 

 

 

 

394 

 

 

7,456 

 

 

268 

 

 

394 

 

 

7,724 

 

 

8,118 

 

 

1,197 

 

1991 

 

2010 

 

249 Nacogdoches, TX

 

 

 

 

1,015 

 

 

11,109 

 

 

 —

 

 

1,015 

 

 

11,109 

 

 

12,124 

 

 

1,766 

 

2007 

 

2011 

 

046 Norwalk, IA

 

 

 

 

47 

 

 

1,033 

 

 

239 

 

 

47 

 

 

1,272 

 

 

1,319 

 

 

750 

 

1975 

 

1996 

 

176 Olathe, KS

 

 

 

 

520 

 

 

1,872 

 

 

313 

 

 

520 

 

 

2,185 

 

 

2,705 

 

 

1,160 

 

1968 

 

1999 

 

251 Pasadena, TX

 

 

 

 

1,155 

 

 

14,345 

 

 

 —

 

 

1,155 

 

 

14,345 

 

 

15,500 

 

 

1,244 

 

2005 

 

2011 

 

210 Phoenix, AZ

 

 

 

 

334 

 

 

3,383 

 

 

456 

 

 

334 

 

 

3,839 

 

 

4,173 

 

 

1,528 

 

1982 

 

2004 

 

193 Phoenix, AZ

 

 

 

 

300 

 

 

9,703 

 

 

92 

 

 

300 

 

 

9,795 

 

 

10,095 

 

 

4,594 

 

1985 

 

2000 

 

047 Polk City, IA

 

 

 

 

63 

 

 

1,376 

 

 

153 

 

 

63 

 

 

1,529 

 

 

1,592 

 

 

888 

 

1976 

 

1996 

 

094 Portland, OR

 

 

 

 

100 

 

 

1,925 

 

 

2,652 

 

 

100 

 

 

4,577 

 

 

4,677 

 

 

2,349 

 

2007 

 

1997 

 

254 Red Oak, TX

 

 

 

 

1,427 

 

 

17,173 

 

 

 —

 

 

1,427 

 

 

17,173 

 

 

18,600 

 

 

1,417 

 

2002 

 

2012 

 

124 Richland Hills, TX

 

 

 

 

144 

 

 

1,656 

 

 

427 

 

 

144 

 

 

2,083 

 

 

2,227 

 

 

982 

 

1976 

 

2001 

 

197 Ripley, TN

 

 

 

 

20 

 

 

985 

 

 

1,606 

 

 

20 

 

 

2,591 

 

 

2,611 

 

 

598 

 

2007 

 

2000 

 

85


 
  
  
  
  
 Gross amount at which carried at
December 31, 2013
  
  
  
 
 
  
 Initial cost to company Costs
capitalized
subsequent
to
acquisition
  
  
  
 
 
 Encumbrances Land Building and
improvements
 Land Building and
improvements
 Total(1) Accum
deprec.
 Construction/
renovation date
 Acquisition
date
 

Skilled Nursing Properties:

                            

134 Alamogordo, NM

 $ $210 $2,593 $371 $210 $2,964 $3,174 $814  1985  2001 

218 Albuquerque, NM

    1,696  3,891  530  1,696  4,421  6,117  1,277  2008  2005 

219 Albuquerque, NM

    1,950  8,910  207  1,950  9,117  11,067  2,617  1982  2005 

220 Albuquerque, NM

    2,463  7,647  9  2,463  7,656  10,119  2,201  1970  2005 

042 Altoona, IA

    105  2,309  444  105  2,753  2,858  1,580  1973  1996 

252 Amarillo, TX

    844    7,925  844  7,925  8,769  186  2013  2011 

214 Aransas Pass, TX

    154  1,276  589  154  1,865  2,019  601  2008  2004 

247 Arlington, TX

    1,016  13,649    1,016  13,649  14,665  1,427  2007  2011 

171 Atlanta, GA

    175  1,282  3  175  1,285  1,460  648  1968  1999 

040 Atmore, AL

    131  2,877  196  131  3,073  3,204  1,594  1974  1996 

221 Beaumont, TX

    370  1,141  93  370  1,234  1,604  410  1950  2005 

213 Beeville, TX

    186  1,197  70  186  1,267  1,453  340  1974  2004 

215 Benbrook, TX

    480  2,121  102  480  2,223  2,703  700  1976  2005 

007 Bradenton, FL

    330  2,720  160  330  2,880  3,210  1,723  2002  1993 

256 Brownwood, TX

    164  6,336    164  6,336  6,500  312  2011  2012 

189 Canyon, TX

  (2) 196  507  211  196  718  914  718  1986  2000 

043 Carroll, IA

    47  1,033  213  47  1,246  1,293  714  1969  1996 

177 Chesapeake, VA

    388  3,469  1,097  388  4,566  4,954  2,638  2007  1995 

257 Cincinnati, OH

    1,890  25,110    1,890  25,110  27,000  816  2009  2012 

125 Clovis, NM

    561  5,539  307  561  5,846  6,407  1,880  2006  2001 

129 Clovis, NM

    598  5,902  59  598  5,961  6,559  1,945  1995  2001 

253 Colton, CA

    2,342  15,158    2,342  15,158  17,500  931  1990  2011 

211 Commerce City, CO

    236  3,217  167  236  3,384  3,620  1,137  1964  2004 

212 Commerce City, CO

    161  2,160  95  161  2,255  2,416  736  1967  2004 

246 Crowley, TX

    2,247  14,276    2,247  14,276  16,523  1,380  2007  2011 

235 Daleville, VA

    279  8,382    279  8,382  8,661  1,086  2005  2010 

258 Dayton, OH

    373  26,627    373  26,627  27,000  871  2010  2012 

196 Dresden, TN

    31  1,529  875  31  2,404  2,435  655  2002  2000 

185 Gardner, KS

    896  4,478  4,150  896  8,628  9,524  2,676  2011  1999 

248 Granbury, TX

    836  6,693    836  6,693  7,529  1,001  2008  2011 

044 Granger, IA

    62  1,356  221  62  1,577  1,639  862  1979  1996 

205 Grapevine, TX

    431  1,449  188  431  1,637  2,068  752  1974  2002 

172 Griffin, GA

    500  2,900    500  2,900  3,400  1,333  1969  1999 

250 Hewitt, TX

    1,780  8,220  99  1,780  8,319  10,099  587  2008  2011 

054 Houston, TX

    202  4,458  1,426  202  5,884  6,086  3,218  2007  1996 

051 Houston, TX

    365  3,769  1,598  365  5,367  5,732  2,874  1968  1996 

055 Houston, TX

    202  4,458  1,359  202  5,817  6,019  3,118  2008  1996 

208 Jacksonville, FL

    486  1,981  30  486  2,011  2,497  764  1987  2002 

045 Jefferson, IA

    86  1,883  296  86  2,179  2,265  1,169  1972  1996 

008 Lecanto, FL

    351  2,665  2,737  351  5,402  5,753  3,040  2006  1993 

053 Mesa, AZ

    305  6,909  1,876  305  8,785  9,090  4,408  1996  1996 

226 Mesa, AZ

    1,095  2,330    1,095  2,330  3,425  637  1979  2006 

050 Midland, TX

    33  2,285  26  33  2,311  2,344  1,256  1973  1996 

242 Mission, TX

    1,111  16,602    1,111  16,602  17,713  1,497  2004  2010 

041 Montgomery, AL

    242  5,327  115  242  5,442  5,684  2,888  1974  1996 

115 Nacogdoches, TX

    100  1,738  168  100  1,906  2,006  960  1973  1997 

233 Nacogdoches, TX

    394  7,456  268  394  7,724  8,118  950  1991  2010 

249 Nacogdoches, TX

    1,015  11,109    1,015  11,109  12,124  1,307  2007  2011 

046 Norwalk, IA

    47  1,033  239  47  1,272  1,319  710  1975  1996 

176 Olathe, KS

    520  1,872  313  520  2,185  2,705  1,089  1968  1999 

251 Pasadena, TX

    1,155  14,345    1,155  14,345  15,500  861  2005  2011 

210 Phoenix, AZ

    334  3,383  456  334  3,839  4,173  1,431  1982  2004 

193 Phoenix, AZ

    300  9,703  92  300  9,795  10,095  4,342  1985  2000 

047 Polk City, IA

    63  1,376  153  63  1,529  1,592  845  1976  1996 

094 Portland, OR

    100  1,925  2,652  100  4,577  4,677  2,134  2007  1997 

254 Red Oak, TX

    1,427  17,173    1,427  17,173  18,600  902  2002  2012 

124 Richland Hills, TX

    144  1,656  427  144  2,083  2,227  931  1976  2001 

197 Ripley, TN

    20  985  641  20  1,626  1,646  554  2007  2000 


LTC PROPERTIES, INC.

SCHEDULE III

REAL ESTATE AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION (Continued)

(in thousands)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Costs

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

capitalized

 

Gross amount at which carried at

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Initial cost to company

 

subsequent

 

December 31, 2014

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Building and

 

to

 

 

 

 

Building and

 

 

 

 

Accum

 

Construction/

 

Acquisition

 

 

 

   

Encumbrances

   

Land

 

improvement

 

acquisition

 

Land

 

improvement

 

Total(1)

 

deprec.

   

renovation date

   

date

   

133 Roswell, NM

  

  

  

 

568 

  

  

5,235 

  

  

1,208 

  

  

568 

  

  

6,443 

  

  

7,011 

  

  

1,839 

  

1975 

  

2001 

 

081 Sacramento, CA

 

 

 

 

220 

 

 

2,929 

 

 

 —

 

 

220 

 

 

2,929 

 

 

3,149 

 

 

1,618 

 

1968 

 

1997 

 

085 Salina, KS

 

 

 

 

100 

 

 

1,153 

 

 

628 

 

 

100 

 

 

1,781 

 

 

1,881 

 

 

1,028 

 

1985 

 

1997 

 

243 Stephenville TX

 

 

 

 

670 

 

 

10,117 

 

 

500 

 

 

670 

 

 

10,617 

 

 

11,287 

 

 

1,432 

 

2009 

 

2010 

 

234 St. Petersburg, FL

 

 

 

 

1,070 

 

 

7,930 

 

 

500 

 

 

1,070 

 

 

8,430 

 

 

9,500 

 

 

1,164 

 

1988 

 

2010 

 

225 Tacoma, WA

 

 

 

 

723 

 

 

6,401 

 

 

901 

 

 

723 

 

 

7,302 

 

 

8,025 

 

 

2,271 

 

2009 

 

2006 

 

178 Tappahannock, VA

 

 

 

 

375 

 

 

1,327 

 

 

397 

 

 

375 

 

 

1,724 

 

 

2,099 

 

 

1,379 

 

1978 

 

1995 

 

270 Trinity, FL

 

 

 

 

1,653 

 

 

12,748 

 

 

 —

 

 

1,653 

 

 

12,748 

 

 

14,401 

 

 

481 

 

N/A

 

2013 

 

192 Tucson, AZ

 

 

 

 

276 

 

 

8,924 

 

 

112 

 

 

276 

 

 

9,036 

 

 

9,312 

 

 

4,233 

 

1992 

 

2000 

 

209 Tyler, TX

 

 

 

 

300 

 

 

3,071 

 

 

22 

 

 

300 

 

 

3,093 

 

 

3,393 

 

 

960 

 

1974 

 

2004 

 

Skilled Nursing Properties

 

 

 —

 

 

42,034 

 

 

401,368 

 

 

38,634 

 

 

42,034 

 

 

440,002 

 

 

482,036 

 

 

107,245 

 

 

 

 

 

Assisted Living Properties:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

077 Ada, OK

 

 

 

 

100 

 

 

1,650 

 

 

 —

 

 

100 

 

 

1,650 

 

 

1,750 

 

 

765 

 

1996 

 

1996 

 

136 Arlington, OH

 

 

 

 

629 

 

 

6,973 

 

 

 —

 

 

629 

 

 

6,973 

 

 

7,602 

 

 

2,353 

 

1993 

 

2001 

 

105 Arvada, CO

 

 

 

 

100 

 

 

2,810 

 

 

6,734 

 

 

100 

 

 

9,544 

 

 

9,644 

 

 

1,497 

 

1997 

 

1997 

 

063 Athens, TX

 

 

 

 

96 

 

 

1,510 

 

 

 

 

96 

 

 

1,511 

 

 

1,607 

 

 

736 

 

1995 

 

1996 

 

269 Aurora, CO

 

 

 

 

850 

 

 

8,111 

 

 

 —

 

 

850 

 

 

8,111 

 

 

8,961 

 

 

27 

 

N/A

 

2013 

 

260 Aurora, CO

 

 

 

 

831 

 

 

10,071 

 

 

 —

 

 

831 

 

 

10,071 

 

 

10,902 

 

 

606 

 

1999 

 

2012 

 

203 Bakersfield, CA

 

 

 

 

834 

 

 

11,986 

 

 

812 

 

 

834 

 

 

12,798 

 

 

13,632 

 

 

4,766 

 

2002 

 

2001 

 

117 Beatrice, NE

 

 

 

 

100 

 

 

2,173 

 

 

 —

 

 

100 

 

 

2,173 

 

 

2,273 

 

 

960 

 

1997 

 

1997 

 

137 Bexley, OH

 

 

 

 

306 

 

 

4,196 

 

 

 —

 

 

306 

 

 

4,196 

 

 

4,502 

 

 

1,417 

 

1992 

 

2001 

 

278 Castle Rock, CO

 

 

 

 

759 

 

 

9,041 

 

 

 —

 

 

759 

 

 

9,041 

 

 

9,800 

 

 

17 

 

N/A

 

2014 

 

160 Central, SC

 

 

 

 

100 

 

 

2,321 

 

 

 —

 

 

100 

 

 

2,321 

 

 

2,421 

 

 

847 

 

1998 

 

1999 

 

263 Chatham, NJ

 

 

 

 

5,365 

 

 

36,399 

 

 

 —

 

 

5,365 

 

 

36,399 

 

 

41,764 

 

 

2,099 

 

2002 

 

2012 

 

240 Daytona Beach, FL

 

 

 

 

900 

 

 

3,400 

 

 

 —

 

 

900 

 

 

3,400 

 

 

4,300 

 

 

440 

 

1996 

 

2010 

 

156 Denison, IA

 

 

 

 

100 

 

 

2,713 

 

 

 —

 

 

100 

 

 

2,713 

 

 

2,813 

 

 

1,143 

 

1998 

 

1998 

 

057 Dodge City, KS

 

 

 

 

84 

 

 

1,666 

 

 

 

 

84 

 

 

1,670 

 

 

1,754 

 

 

834 

 

1995 

 

1995 

 

083 Durant, OK

 

 

 

 

100 

 

 

1,769 

 

 

 —

 

 

100 

 

 

1,769 

 

 

1,869 

 

 

804 

 

1997 

 

1997 

 

107 Edmond, OK

 

 

 

 

100 

 

 

1,365 

 

 

526 

 

 

100 

 

 

1,891 

 

 

1,991 

 

 

839 

 

1996 

 

1997 

 

122 Elkhart, IN

 

 

 

 

100 

 

 

2,435 

 

 

 —

 

 

100 

 

 

2,435 

 

 

2,535 

 

 

1,058 

 

1997 

 

1997 

 

155 Erie, PA

 

 

 

 

850 

 

 

7,477 

 

 

 —

 

 

850 

 

 

7,477 

 

 

8,327 

 

 

3,184 

 

1998 

 

1999 

 

100 Fremont ,OH

 

 

 

 

100 

 

 

2,435 

 

 

 —

 

 

100 

 

 

2,435 

 

 

2,535 

 

 

1,083 

 

1997 

 

1997 

 

267 Frisco, TX

 

 

 

 

1,000 

 

 

4,939 

 

 

 —

 

 

1,000 

 

 

4,939 

 

 

5,939 

 

 

56 

 

N/A

 

2012 

 

163 Ft. Collins, CO

 

 

 

 

100 

 

 

2,961 

 

 

2,920 

 

 

100 

 

 

5,881 

 

 

5,981 

 

 

1,209 

 

1998 

 

1999 

 

170 Ft. Collins, CO

 

 

 

 

100 

 

 

3,400 

 

 

2,324 

 

 

100 

 

 

5,724 

 

 

5,824 

 

 

1,353 

 

1999 

 

1999 

 

132 Ft. Meyers, FL

 

 

 

 

100 

 

 

2,728 

 

 

 

 

100 

 

 

2,737 

 

 

2,837 

 

 

1,170 

 

1998 

 

1998 

 

230 Ft. Wayne, IN

 

 

 

 

594 

 

 

3,461 

 

 

731 

 

 

594 

 

 

4,192 

 

 

4,786 

 

 

767 

 

1996 

 

2009 

 

229 Ft. Worth, TX

 

 

 

 

333 

 

 

4,385 

 

 

1,028 

 

 

333 

 

 

5,413 

 

 

5,746 

 

 

1,464 

 

2009 

 

2008 

 

167 Goldsboro, NC

 

 

 

 

100 

 

 

2,385 

 

 

 

 

100 

 

 

2,386 

 

 

2,486 

 

 

810 

 

1998 

 

1999 

 

056 Great Bend, KS

 

 

 

 

80 

 

 

1,570 

 

 

21 

 

 

80 

 

 

1,591 

 

 

1,671 

 

 

872 

 

1995 

 

1995 

 

102 Greeley, CO

 

 

 

 

100 

 

 

2,310 

 

 

270 

 

 

100 

 

 

2,580 

 

 

2,680 

 

 

1,141 

 

1997 

 

1997 

 

164 Greenville, NC

 

 

 

 

100 

 

 

2,478 

 

 

 

 

100 

 

 

2,480 

 

 

2,580 

 

 

948 

 

1998 

 

1999 

 

062 Greenville, TX

 

 

 

 

42 

 

 

1,565 

 

 

 —

 

 

42 

 

 

1,565 

 

 

1,607 

 

 

762 

 

1995 

 

1996 

 

161 Greenwood, SC

 

 

 

 

100 

 

 

2,638 

 

 

 —

 

 

100 

 

 

2,638 

 

 

2,738 

 

 

1,030 

 

1998 

 

1999 

 

241 Gulf Breeze, FL

 

 

 

 

720 

 

 

3,780 

 

 

 —

 

 

720 

 

 

3,780 

 

 

4,500 

 

 

528 

 

2000 

 

2010 

 

066 Jacksonville, TX

 

 

 

 

100 

 

 

1,900 

 

 

 —

 

 

100 

 

 

1,900 

 

 

2,000 

 

 

918 

 

1996 

 

1996 

 

86


 
  
  
  
  
 Gross amount at which carried at
December 31, 2013
  
  
  
 
 
  
 Initial cost to company Costs
capitalized
subsequent
to
acquisition
  
  
  
 
 
 Encumbrances Land Building and
improvements
 Land Building and
improvements
 Total(1) Accum
deprec.
 Construction/
renovation date
 Acquisition
date
 

133 Roswell, NM

    568  5,235  1,056  568  6,291  6,859  1,644  1975  2001 

081 Sacramento, CA

    220  2,929    220  2,929  3,149  1,541  1968  1997 

085 Salina, KS

  (2) 100  1,153  628  100  1,781  1,881  981  1985  1997 

243 Stephenville TX

    670  10,117    670  10,117  10,787  1,142  2009  2010 

234 St. Petersburg, FL

    1,070  7,930    1,070  7,930  9,000  923  1988  2010 

225 Tacoma, WA

    723  6,401  901  723  7,302  8,025  2,037  2009  2006 

178 Tappahannock, VA

  (2) 375  1,327  397  375  1,724  2,099  1,342  1978  1995 

270 Trinity, FL

    1,653  12,748    1,653  12,748  14,401  69  N/A  2013 

192 Tucson, AZ

    276  8,924  112  276  9,036  9,312  4,000  1992  2000 

209 Tyler, TX

    300  3,071  22  300  3,093  3,393  887  1974  2004 
                        

Skilled Nursing Properties

    40,180  382,210  36,369  40,180  418,579  458,759  95,599       
                        

Assisted Living Properties:

                            

077 Ada, OK

    100  1,650    100  1,650  1,750  725  1996  1996 

136 Arlington, OH

    629  6,973    629  6,973  7,602  2,182  1993  2001 

105 Arvada, CO

    100  2,810  280  100  3,090  3,190  1,282  1997  1997 

063 Athens, TX

    96  1,510  1  96  1,511  1,607  699  1995  1996 

260 Aurora, CO

    831  10,071    831  10,071  10,902  303  1999  2012 

203 Bakersfield, CA

    834  11,986  812  834  12,798  13,632  4,367  2002  2001 

072 Battleground, WA

    100  2,500    100  2,500  2,600  1,091  1996  1996 

117 Beatrice, NE

    100  2,173    100  2,173  2,273  907  1997  1997 

137 Bexley, OH

    306  4,196    306  4,196  4,502  1,314  1992  2001 

106 Bullhead City, AZ

    100  2,500    100  2,500  2,600  1,045  1997  1997 

111 Burley, ID

    100  2,200    100  2,200  2,300  922  1997  1997 

112 Caldwell, ID

    100  2,200    100  2,200  2,300  922  1997  1997 

024 Camas, WA

  (3) 100  2,175    100  2,175  2,275  979  1996  1996 

160 Central, SC

    100  2,321    100  2,321  2,421  797  1998  1999 

263 Chatham, NJ

    5,365  36,399    5,365  36,399  41,764  1,050  2002  2012 

191 Cordele, GA

    153  1,455  132  153  1,587  1,740  701  2002  2000 

240 Daytona Beach, FL

    900  3,400    900  3,400  4,300  334  1996  2010 

156 Denison, IA

    100  2,713    100  2,713  2,813  1,076  1998  1998 

057 Dodge City, KS

    84  1,666  4  84  1,670  1,754  794  1995  1995 

083 Durant, OK

    100  1,769    100  1,769  1,869  761  1997  1997 

107 Edmond, OK

    100  1,365  526  100  1,891  1,991  792  1996  1997 

122 Elkhart, IN

    100  2,435    100  2,435  2,535  999  1997  1997 

155 Erie, PA

    850  7,477    850  7,477  8,327  3,010  1998  1999 

113 Eugene, OR

    100  2,600    100  2,600  2,700  1,086  1997  1997 

100 Fremont ,OH

    100  2,435    100  2,435  2,535  1,023  1997  1997 

163 Ft. Collins, CO

    100  2,961  2  100  2,963  3,063  1,109  1998  1999 

170 Ft. Collins, CO

    100  3,400  2  100  3,402  3,502  1,252  1999  1999 

132 Ft. Meyers, FL

    100  2,728  9  100  2,737  2,837  1,103  1998  1998 

230 Ft. Wayne, IN

    594  3,461  731  594  4,192  4,786  594  1996  2009 

229 Ft. Worth, TX

    333  4,385  1,028  333  5,413  5,746  1,280  2009  2008 

167 Goldsboro, NC

    100  2,385  1  100  2,386  2,486  762  1998  1999 

022 Grandview, WA

  (3) 100  1,940    100  1,940  2,040  888  1996  1996 

056 Great Bend, KS

    80  1,570  21  80  1,591  1,671  827  1995  1995 

102 Greeley, CO

    100  2,310  270  100  2,580  2,680  1,078  1997  1997 

164 Greenville, NC

    100  2,478  2  100  2,480  2,580  891  1998  1999 

062 Greenville, TX

    42  1,565    42  1,565  1,607  723  1995  1996 

161 Greenwood, SC

    100  2,638    100  2,638  2,738  968  1998  1999 

241 Gulf Breeze, FL

    720  3,780    720  3,780  4,500  402  2000  2010 

079 Hayden, ID

    100  2,450  243  100  2,693  2,793  1,168  1996  1996 

097 Hoquiam, WA

    100  2,500    100  2,500  2,600  1,050  1997  1997 

066 Jacksonville, TX

    100  1,900    100  1,900  2,000  872  1996  1996 

071 Kelso, WA

    100  2,500    100  2,500  2,600  1,147  1996  1996 

021 Kennewick. WA

  (3) 100  1,940    100  1,940  2,040  892  1996  1996 

073 Klamath Falls, OR

    100  2,300    100  2,300  2,400  1,001  1996  1996 

101 Lake Havasu, AZ

    100  2,420    100  2,420  2,520  1,017  1997  1997 

190 Lakeland, FL

    519  2,312  1,626  519  3,938  4,457  1,648  2009  2000 


LTC PROPERTIES, INC.

SCHEDULE III

REAL ESTATE AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION (Continued)

(in thousands)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Costs

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

capitalized

 

Gross amount at which carried at

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Initial cost to company

 

subsequent

 

December 31, 2014

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Building and

 

to

 

 

 

 

Building and

 

 

 

 

Accum

 

Construction/

 

Acquisition

 

 

 

Encumbrances

 

Land

 

 

improvements

 

acquisition

 

Land

 

improvement

 

Total(1)

 

deprec.

 

renovation date

 

date

 

255 Littleton, CO

  

  

  

  

1,882 

  

  

8,248 

  

  

 —

  

  

1,882 

  

  

8,248 

  

  

10,130 

  

  

439 

  

2013 

  

2012 

 

268 Littleton, CO

 

    

 

    

1,200 

 

    

8,684 

 

    

 —

 

    

1,200 

 

    

8,684 

 

    

9,884 

 

    

152 

    

2013 

    

2013 

 

148 Longmont, CO

 

 

 

 

100 

 

 

2,640 

 

 

 —

 

 

100 

 

 

2,640 

 

 

2,740 

 

 

1,118 

 

1998 

 

1998 

 

060 Longview, TX

 

 

 

 

38 

 

 

1,568 

 

 

 

 

38 

 

 

1,569 

 

 

1,607 

 

 

769 

 

1995 

 

1995 

 

261 Louisville, CO

 

 

 

 

911 

 

 

11,703 

 

 

 —

 

 

911 

 

 

11,703 

 

 

12,614 

 

 

690 

 

2000 

 

2012 

 

114 Loveland, CO

 

 

 

 

100 

 

 

2,865 

 

 

270 

 

 

100 

 

 

3,135 

 

 

3,235 

 

 

1,371 

 

1997 

 

1997 

 

068 Lufkin, TX

 

 

 

 

100 

 

 

1,950 

 

 

 —

 

 

100 

 

 

1,950 

 

 

2,050 

 

 

936 

 

1996 

 

1996 

 

119 Madison, IN

 

 

 

 

100 

 

 

2,435 

 

 

 —

 

 

100 

 

 

2,435 

 

 

2,535 

 

 

1,073 

 

1997 

 

1997 

 

061 Marshall, TX

 

 

 

 

38 

 

 

1,568 

 

 

451 

 

 

38 

 

 

2,019 

 

 

2,057 

 

 

997 

 

1995 

 

1995 

 

058 McPherson, KS

 

 

 

 

79 

 

 

1,571 

 

 

 

 

79 

 

 

1,575 

 

 

1,654 

 

 

863 

 

1994 

 

1995 

 

239 Merritt Island, FL

 

 

 

 

550 

 

 

8,150 

 

 

 —

 

 

550 

 

 

8,150 

 

 

8,700 

 

 

1,076 

 

2004 

 

2010 

 

104 Millville, NJ

 

 

 

 

100 

 

 

2,825 

 

 

 —

 

 

100 

 

 

2,825 

 

 

2,925 

 

 

1,253 

 

1997 

 

1997 

 

231 Monroeville, PA

 

 

 

 

526 

 

 

5,334 

 

 

435 

 

 

526 

 

 

5,769 

 

 

6,295 

 

 

947 

 

1997 

 

2009 

 

166 New Bern, NC

 

 

 

 

100 

 

 

2,427 

 

 

 

 

100 

 

 

2,428 

 

 

2,528 

 

 

841 

 

1998 

 

1999 

 

118 Newark, OH

 

 

 

 

100 

 

 

2,435 

 

 

 —

 

 

100 

 

 

2,435 

 

 

2,535 

 

 

1,073 

 

1997 

 

1997 

 

123 Newport Richey, FL

 

 

 

 

100 

 

 

5,845 

 

 

664 

 

 

100 

 

 

6,509 

 

 

6,609 

 

 

3,181 

 

1995 

 

1998 

 

074 Newport, OR

 

 

 

 

100 

 

 

2,050 

 

 

 —

 

 

100 

 

 

2,050 

 

 

2,150 

 

 

1,215 

 

1996 

 

1996 

 

143 Niceville, FL

 

 

 

 

100 

 

 

2,680 

 

 

 —

 

 

100 

 

 

2,680 

 

 

2,780 

 

 

1,135 

 

1998 

 

1998 

 

095 Norfolk, NE

 

 

 

 

100 

 

 

2,123 

 

 

 —

 

 

100 

 

 

2,123 

 

 

2,223 

 

 

952 

 

1997 

 

1997 

 

232 Pittsburgh, PA

 

 

 

 

470 

 

 

2,615 

 

 

333 

 

 

470 

 

 

2,948 

 

 

3,418 

 

 

529 

 

1994 

 

2009 

 

165 Rocky Mount, NC

 

 

 

 

100 

 

 

2,494 

 

 

 

 

100 

 

 

2,495 

 

 

2,595 

 

 

890 

 

1998 

 

1999 

 

141 Rocky River, OH

 

 

 

 

760 

 

 

6,963 

 

 

 —

 

 

760 

 

 

6,963 

 

 

7,723 

 

 

2,915 

 

1998 

 

1999 

 

059 Salina, KS

 

 

 

 

79 

 

 

1,571 

 

 

 

 

79 

 

 

1,575 

 

 

1,654 

 

 

863 

 

1994 

 

1995 

 

084 San Antonio, TX

 

 

 

 

100 

 

 

1,900 

 

 

 —

 

 

100 

 

 

1,900 

 

 

2,000 

 

 

862 

 

1997 

 

1997 

 

092 San Antonio, TX

 

 

 

 

100 

 

 

2,055 

 

 

 —

 

 

100 

 

 

2,055 

 

 

2,155 

 

 

926 

 

1997 

 

1997 

 

149 Shelby, NC

 

 

 

 

100 

 

 

2,805 

 

 

 

 

100 

 

 

2,807 

 

 

2,907 

 

 

1,188 

 

1998 

 

1998 

 

150 Spring Hill, FL

 

 

 

 

100 

 

 

2,650 

 

 

 —

 

 

100 

 

 

2,650 

 

 

2,750 

 

 

1,123 

 

1998 

 

1998 

 

103 Springfield, OH

 

 

 

 

100 

 

 

2,035 

 

 

270 

 

 

100 

 

 

2,305 

 

 

2,405 

 

 

1,017 

 

1997 

 

1997 

 

162 Sumter, SC

 

 

 

 

100 

 

 

2,351 

 

 

 —

 

 

100 

 

 

2,351 

 

 

2,451 

 

 

881 

 

1998 

 

1999 

 

140 Tallahassee, FL

 

 

 

 

100 

 

 

3,075 

 

 

 —

 

 

100 

 

 

3,075 

 

 

3,175 

 

 

1,305 

 

1998 

 

1998 

 

098 Tiffin, OH

 

 

 

 

100 

 

 

2,435 

 

 

 —

 

 

100 

 

 

2,435 

 

 

2,535 

 

 

1,083 

 

1997 

 

1997 

 

088 Troy, OH

 

 

 

 

100 

 

 

2,435 

 

 

306 

 

 

100 

 

 

2,741 

 

 

2,841 

 

 

1,225 

 

1997 

 

1997 

 

080 Tulsa, OK

 

 

 

 

200 

 

 

1,650 

 

 

 —

 

 

200 

 

 

1,650 

 

 

1,850 

 

 

758 

 

1997 

 

1997 

 

093 Tulsa, OK

 

 

 

 

100 

 

 

2,395 

 

 

 —

 

 

100 

 

 

2,395 

 

 

2,495 

 

 

1,076 

 

1997 

 

1997 

 

238 Tupelo, MS

 

 

 

 

1,170 

 

 

8,230 

 

 

30 

 

 

1,170 

 

 

8,260 

 

 

9,430 

 

 

1,144 

 

2000 

 

2010 

 

075 Tyler, TX

 

 

 

 

100 

 

 

1,800 

 

 

 —

 

 

100 

 

 

1,800 

 

 

1,900 

 

 

832 

 

1996 

 

1996 

 

202 Vacaville, CA

 

 

 

 

1,662 

 

 

11,634 

 

 

1,141 

 

 

1,662 

 

 

12,775 

 

 

14,437 

 

 

4,697 

 

2002 

 

2001 

 

091 Waco, TX

 

 

 

 

100 

 

 

2,235 

 

 

 —

 

 

100 

 

 

2,235 

 

 

2,335 

 

 

1,005 

 

1997 

 

1997 

 

096 Wahoo, NE

 

 

 

 

100 

 

 

2,318 

 

 

 —

 

 

100 

 

 

2,318 

 

 

2,418 

 

 

1,032 

 

1997 

 

1997 

 

108 Watauga, TX

 

 

 

 

100 

 

 

1,668 

 

 

 —

 

 

100 

 

 

1,668 

 

 

1,768 

 

 

746 

 

1996 

 

1997 

 

109 Weatherford, OK

 

 

 

 

100 

 

 

1,669 

 

 

592 

 

 

100 

 

 

2,261 

 

 

2,361 

 

 

999 

 

1996 

 

1997 

 

110 Wheelersburg, OH

 

 

 

 

29 

 

 

2,435 

 

 

 —

 

 

29 

 

 

2,435 

 

 

2,464 

 

 

1,073 

 

1997 

 

1997 

 

259 Wichita, KS

 

 

 —

 

 

730 

 

 

 —

 

 

9,682 

 

 

730 

 

 

9,682 

 

 

10,412 

 

 

465 

 

2013 

 

2012 

 

076 Wichita Falls, TX

 

 

 

 

100 

 

 

1,850 

 

 

 —

 

 

100 

 

 

1,850 

 

 

1,950 

 

 

855 

 

1996 

 

1996 

 

120 Wichita Falls, TX

 

 

 

 

100 

 

 

2,750 

 

 

 —

 

 

100 

 

 

2,750 

 

 

2,850 

 

 

1,215 

 

1997 

 

1997 

 

265 Williamstown, NJ

 

 

 

 

711 

 

 

6,637 

 

 

 —

 

 

711 

 

 

6,637 

 

 

7,348 

 

 

429 

 

2000 

 

2012 

 

264 Williamstown, NJ

 

 

 

 

711 

 

 

8,649 

 

 

 —

 

 

711 

 

 

8,649 

 

 

9,360 

 

 

505 

 

2000 

 

2012 

 

138 Worthington, OH

 

 

 

 

 —

 

 

6,102 

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

6,102 

 

 

6,102 

 

 

4,843 

 

1993 

 

2001 

 

139 Worthington, OH

 

 

 

 

 —

 

 

3,402 

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

3,402 

 

 

3,402 

 

 

2,717 

 

1995 

 

2001 

 

099 York, NE

 

 

 

 

100 

 

 

2,318 

 

 

 —

 

 

100 

 

 

2,318 

 

 

2,418 

 

 

1,032 

 

1997 

 

1997 

 

Assisted Living Properties

 

 

 —

 

 

30,719 

 

 

341,228 

 

 

29,570 

 

 

30,719 

 

 

370,798 

 

 

401,517 

 

 

98,814 

 

 

 

 

 

Range of Care Properties:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

199 Brownsville, TX

 

 

 

 

302 

 

 

1,856 

 

 

835 

 

 

302 

 

 

2,691 

 

 

2,993 

 

 

878 

 

2009 

 

2004 

 

168 Des Moines, IA(2)

 

 

 

 

115 

 

 

2,096 

 

 

1,433 

 

 

115 

 

 

3,529 

 

 

3,644 

 

 

1,795 

 

1972 

 

1999 

 

26A Gardendale, AL

 

 

 

 

100 

 

 

7,550 

 

 

2,084 

 

 

100 

 

 

9,634 

 

 

9,734 

 

 

4,548 

 

2009 

 

1996 

 

87


 
  
  
  
  
 Gross amount at which carried at
December 31, 2013
  
  
  
 
 
  
 Initial cost to company Costs
capitalized
subsequent
to
acquisition
  
  
  
 
 
 Encumbrances Land Building and
improvements
 Land Building and
improvements
 Total(1) Accum
deprec.
 Construction/
renovation date
 Acquisition
date
 

255 Littleton, CO

    1,882    8,249  1,882  8,249  10,131  147  2013  2012 

148 Longmont, CO

    100  2,640    100  2,640  2,740  1,053  1998  1998 

060 Longview, TX

    38  1,568  1  38  1,569  1,607  731  1995  1995 

221 Louisville, CO

    911  11,703    911  11,703  12,614  345  2000  2012 

114 Loveland, CO

    100  2,865  270  100  3,135  3,235  1,294  1997  1997 

068 Lufkin, TX

    100  1,950    100  1,950  2,050  888  1996  1996 

119 Madison, IN

    100  2,435    100  2,435  2,535  1,013  1997  1997 

061 Marshall, TX

    38  1,568  451  38  2,019  2,057  945  1995  1995 

058 McPherson, KS

    79  1,571  4  79  1,575  1,654  819  1994  1995 

239 Merritt Island, FL

    550  8,150    550  8,150  8,700  818  2004  2010 

104 Millville, NJ

    100  2,825    100  2,825  2,925  1,183  1997  1997 

231 Monroeville, PA

    526  5,334  435  526  5,769  6,295  743  1997  2009 

082 Nampa, ID

    100  2,240  23  100  2,263  2,363  985  1997  1997 

166 New Bern, NC

    100  2,427  1  100  2,428  2,528  790  1998  1999 

118 Newark, OH

    100  2,435    100  2,435  2,535  1,013  1997  1997 

123 Newport Richey, FL

    100  5,845  664  100  6,509  6,609  2,994  1995  1998 

074 Newport, OR

    100  2,050    100  2,050  2,150  1,140  1996  1996 

143 Niceville, FL

    100  2,680    100  2,680  2,780  1,069  1998  1998 

095 Norfolk, NE

    100  2,123    100  2,123  2,223  900  1997  1997 

232 Pittsburgh, PA

    470  2,615  333  470  2,948  3,418  411  1994  2009 

165 Rocky Mount, NC

    100  2,494  1  100  2,495  2,595  837  1998  1999 

141 Rocky River, OH

    760  6,963    760  6,963  7,723  2,751  1998  1999 

059 Salina, KS

    79  1,571  4  79  1,575  1,654  819  1994  1995 

084 San Antonio, TX

    100  1,900    100  1,900  2,000  815  1997  1997 

092 San Antonio, TX

    100  2,055    100  2,055  2,155  876  1997  1997 

149 Shelby, NC

    100  2,805  2  100  2,807  2,907  1,118  1998  1998 

150 Spring Hill, FL

    100  2,650    100  2,650  2,750  1,057  1998  1998 

103 Springfield, OH

    100  2,035  270  100  2,305  2,405  961  1997  1997 

162 Sumter, SC

    100  2,351    100  2,351  2,451  828  1998  1999 

140 Tallahassee, FL

    100  3,075    100  3,075  3,175  1,229  1998  1998 

098 Tiffin, OH

    100  2,435    100  2,435  2,535  1,023  1997  1997 

088 Troy, OH

    100  2,435  306  100  2,741  2,841  1,157  1997  1997 

080 Tulsa, OK

    200  1,650    200  1,650  1,850  718  1997  1997 

093 Tulsa, OK

    100  2,395    100  2,395  2,495  1,017  1997  1997 

238 Tupelo, MS

    1,170  8,230    1,170  8,230  9,400  870  2000  2010 

075 Tyler, TX

    100  1,800    100  1,800  1,900  788  1996  1996 

202 Vacaville, CA

    1,662  11,634  1,141  1,662  12,775  14,437  4,300  2002  2001 

025 Vancouver, WA

  (3) 100  2,785    100  2,785  2,885  1,252  1996  1996 

091 Waco, TX

    100  2,235    100  2,235  2,335  950  1997  1997 

096 Wahoo, NE

    100  2,318    100  2,318  2,418  975  1997  1997 

023 Walla Walla, WA

  2,035(3) 100  1,940    100  1,940  2,040  884  1996  1996 

108 Watauga, TX

    100  1,668    100  1,668  1,768  705  1996  1997 

109 Weatherford, OK

    100  1,669  592  100  2,261  2,361  943  1996  1997 

110 Wheelersburg, OH

    29  2,435    29  2,435  2,464  1,013  1997  1997 

259 Wichita, KS

    730    9,131  730  9,131  9,861  64  2013  2012 

076 Wichita Falls, TX

    100  1,850    100  1,850  1,950  810  1996  1996 

120 Wichita Falls, TX

    100  2,750    100  2,750  2,850  1,147  1997  1997 

264 Williamstown, NJ

    711  8,649    711  8,649  9,360  253  2000  2012 

265 Williamstown, NJ

    711  6,637    711  6,637  7,348  215  2000  2012 

138 Worthington, OH

      6,102      6,102  6,102  4,398  1993  2001 

139 Worthington, OH

      3,402      3,402  3,402  2,475  1995  2001 

099 York, NE

    100  2,318    100  2,318  2,418  975  1997  1997 
                        

Assisted Living Properties

  2,035  29,182  343,162  27,568  29,182  370,730  399,912  107,337       
                        

Range of Care Properties:

                            

199 Brownsville, TX

    302  1,856  835  302  2,691  2,993  783  2009  2004 

168 Des Moines, IA(2)

    115  2,096  1,433  115  3,529  3,644  1,710  1972  1999 

26A Gardendale, AL

    84  6,316  2,084  84  8,400  8,484  3,574  2009  1996 

26B Gardendale, AL

    16  1,234    16  1,234  1,250  644  1988  1996 


LTC PROPERTIES, INC.

SCHEDULE III

REAL ESTATE AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION (Continued)

(in thousands)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Costs

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

capitalized

 

Gross amount at which carried at

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Initial cost to company

 

subsequent

 

December 31, 2014

 

 

��

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Building and

 

to

 

 

 

 

Building and

 

 

 

 

Accum

 

Construction/

 

Acquisition

 

 

 

Encumbrances

 

Land

 

improvements

 

acquisition

 

Land

 

improvements

 

Total(1)

 

deprec.

 

renovation date

 

date

 

194 Holyoke, CO

  

 

— 

  

 

211 

  

 

1,513 

  

 

283 

  

 

211 

  

 

1,796 

  

 

2,007 

  

 

955 

  

1963 

  

2000 

 

245 Newberry, SC

 

 

— 

 

 

439 

 

 

4,639 

 

 

608 

 

 

439 

 

 

5,247 

 

 

5,686 

 

 

867 

 

1995 

 

2011 

 

244 Newberry, SC

 

 

— 

 

 

919 

 

 

5,454 

 

 

131 

 

 

919 

 

 

5,585 

 

 

6,504 

 

 

818 

 

2001 

 

2011 

 

236 Wytheville, VA

 

 

— 

 

 

647 

 

 

12,692 

 

 

 — 

 

 

647 

 

 

12,692 

 

 

13,339 

 

 

2,606 

 

1996 

 

2010 

 

Range of Care Properties

 

 

— 

 

 

2,733 

 

 

35,800 

 

 

5,374 

 

 

2,733 

 

 

41,174 

 

 

43,907 

 

 

12,467 

 

 

 

 

 

Other:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

School:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

159 Trenton, NJ

 

 

— 

 

 

100 

 

 

6,000 

 

 

3,170 

 

 

100 

 

 

9,170 

 

 

9,270 

 

 

4,789 

 

1998 

 

1998 

 

School

 

 

— 

 

 

100 

 

 

6,000 

 

 

3,170 

 

 

100 

 

 

9,170 

 

 

9,270 

 

 

4,789 

 

 

 

 

 

Land:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

271 Howell, MI

 

 

— 

 

 

420 

 

 

— 

 

 

— 

 

 

420 

 

 

— 

 

 

420 

 

 

— 

 

N/A

 

2013 

 

273 Richmond, MI

 

 

— 

 

 

380 

 

 

— 

 

 

— 

 

 

380 

 

 

— 

 

 

380 

 

 

— 

 

N/A

 

2013 

 

274 Rochester Hills, MI

 

 

— 

 

 

290 

 

 

— 

 

 

— 

 

 

290 

 

 

— 

 

 

290 

 

 

— 

 

N/A

 

2013 

 

275 Yale, MI

 

 

— 

 

 

73 

 

 

— 

 

 

— 

 

 

73 

 

 

— 

 

 

73 

 

 

— 

 

N/A

 

2013 

 

999 Milford, MI

 

 

— 

 

 

450 

 

 

— 

 

 

— 

 

 

450 

 

 

— 

 

 

450 

 

 

— 

 

N/A

 

2014 

 

Land

 

 

— 

 

 

1,613 

 

 

 — 

 

 

 — 

 

 

1,613 

 

 

 — 

 

 

1,613 

 

 

 — 

 

 

 

 

 

Other Properties

 

 

— 

 

 

1,713 

 

 

6,000 

 

 

3,170 

 

 

1,713 

 

 

9,170 

 

 

10,883 

 

 

4,789 

 

 

 

 

 

Properties Under Development:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

276 Westminster, CO

 

 

— 

 

 

1,425 

 

 

 — 

 

 

7,994 

 

 

1,425 

 

 

7,994 

 

 

9,419 

 

 

 — 

 

N/A

 

2013 

 

999 Burr Ridge, IL

 

 

— 

 

 

1,400 

 

 

 — 

 

 

676 

 

 

1,400 

 

 

676 

 

 

2,076 

 

 

 — 

 

N/A

 

2014 

 

Properties Under Development

 

 

— 

 

 

2,825 

 

 

 — 

 

 

8,670 

 

 

2,825 

 

 

8,670 

 

 

11,495 

 

 

 — 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

— 

 

$

80,024 

 

$

784,396 

 

$

85,418 

 

$

80,024 

 

$

869,814 

 

$

949,838 

(2)

$

223,315 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


(1)

Depreciation is computed principally by the straight‑line method for financial reporting purposes which generally range of a life from 5 to 15 years for furniture and equipment, 35 to 45 years for buildings, 10 to 20 years for building improvements and the respective lease term for acquired lease intangibles.

(2)

As of December 31, 2014, our aggregate cost for Federal income tax purposes was $965,043.

88


 
  
  
  
  
 Gross amount at which carried at
December 31, 2013
  
  
  
 
 
  
 Initial cost to company Costs
capitalized
subsequent
to
acquisition
  
  
  
 
 
 Encumbrances Land Building and
improvements
 Land Building and
improvements
 Total(1) Accum
deprec.
 Construction/
renovation date
 Acquisition
date
 

194 Holyoke, CO

    211  1,513  283  211  1,796  2,007  919  1963  2000 

245 Newberry, SC

    439  4,639  608  439  5,247  5,686  621  1995  2011 

244 Newberry, SC

    919  5,454  131  919  5,585  6,504  601  2001  2011 

236 Wytheville, VA

    647  12,692    647  12,692  13,339  2,037  1996  2010 
                        

Range of Care Properties

    2,733  35,800  5,374  2,733  41,174  43,907  10,889       
                        

Other:

                            

Schools:

                            

237 Eagan, MN

    1,110  1,789  275  1,110  2,064  3,174  392  1994  2010 

159 Trenton, NJ

    100  6,000  3,170  100  9,170  9,270  4,483  1998  1998 
                        

Schools

    1,210  7,789  3,445  1,210  11,234  12,444  4,875       
                        

Land:

                            

271 Howell, MI

    420      420    420    N/A  2013 

273 Richmond, MI

    380      380    380    N/A  2013 

274 Rochester Hills, MI

    290      290    290    N/A  2013 

275 Yale, MI

    73      73    73    N/A  2013 
                        

Land

    1,163      1,163    1,163         
                        

Other

    2,373  7,789  3,445  2,373  11,234  13,607  4,875       
                        

Properties Under Development:

                               

268 Littleton, CO

    1,200    2,170  1,200  2,170  3,370    N/A  2013 

269 Aurora, CO

    850    655  850  655  1,505    N/A  2013 

276 Westminster, CO

    1,425    1,015  1,425  1,015  2,440    N/A  2013 

268 Coldspring, KY

    2,050  2,688  5,893  2,050  8,581  10,631    N/A  2012 

267 Frisco, TX

    1,000    2,486  1,000  2,486  3,486    N/A  2012 
                        

Properties Under Development

    6,525  2,688  12,219  6,525  14,907  21,432         
                        

 $2,035 $80,993 $771,649 $84,975 $80,993 $856,624 $937,617(4)$218,700       
                        
                        


Contents


LTC PROPERTIES, INC.

SCHEDULE III

REAL ESTATE AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION (Continued)

(in thousands)

        Activity for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011 is as follows:

 
 For the Year Ended December 31, 
 
 2013 2012 2011 

Reconciliation of real estate:

          

Carrying cost:

          

Balance at beginning of period

 $900,095 $725,031 $615,666 

Acquisitions

  19,040  166,750  106,135 

Improvements

  32,008  11,219  3,230 

Conversion of mortgage loans into owned properties

       

Impairment charges

       

Cost of real estate sold

  (13,526) (2,905)  
        

Ending balance

 $937,617 $900,095 $725,031 
        
        

Accumulated depreciation:

          

Balance at beginning of period

 $198,548 $178,196 $158,709 

Depreciation Expense

  24,568  22,002  19,487 

Conversion of mortgage loans into owned properties

       

Impairment charges

       

Cost of real estate sold

  (4,416) (1,650)  
        

Ending balance

 $218,700 $198,548 $178,196 
        
        


LTC PROPERTIES, INC.

SCHEDULE IV

MORTGAGE LOANS ON REAL ESTATE

(in thousands)

 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
 Principal
Amount of
Loans
Subject to
Delinquent
Principal or
Interest
 
 
 (Unaudited)
Number of
  
  
  
  
  
 Carrying
Amount of
Mortgages
December 31,
2013
 
 
  
  
  
 Current
Monthly
Debt
Service
  
 
 
  
 Final
Maturity Date
 Balloon
Amount(2)
 Face
Amount of
Mortgages
 
State
 Properties Units/Beds(3) Interest Rate(1) 

FL

  3  269 11.90% 2014 $6,061 $72 $6,850 $6,166 $ 

MI

  15  2,092 9.53% 2043  97,387  988  124,387  124,387   

TX

  6  100 10.25% 2018  5,095  67  6,800  6,067   

PA

  1  70 7.00% 2014  5,100  30  5,100  5,100   

WI

  1  106 10.10% 2022    63  2,619  7,590   

Various

  15  1,700 10.60%-13.63% 2014-2019  10,648  317  27,715  16,134   
                    

  41(4) 4,337     $124,291 $1,537 $173,471 $165,444 $ 
                    
                    

(1)
Represents current stated interest rate. Generally, the loans have 25-year amortization with principal and interest payable at varying amounts over the life to maturity with annual interest adjustments through specified fixed rate increases effective either on the first anniversary or calendar year of the loan.
(2)
Balloon payment is due upon maturity.
(3)
This number is based upon unit/bed counts shown on operating licenses provided to us by lessees/borrowers or units/beds as stipulated by lease/mortgage documents. We have found during the years that these numbers often differ, usually not materially, from units/beds in operation at any point in time. The differences are caused by such things as operators converting a patient/resident room for alternative uses, such as offices or storage, or converting a multi-patient room/unit into a single patient room/unit. We monitor our properties on a routine basis through site visits and reviews of current licenses. In an instance where such change would cause a de-licensing of beds or in our opinion impact the value of the property, we would take action against the lessee/borrower to preserve the value of the property/collateral.
(4)
Includes 20 first-lien mortgage loans as follows:

Number of Loans
Original loan amounts

12

$   500 - $2,000

2

$2,001 - $3,000

1

$3,001 - $4,000

1

$4,001 - $5,000

1

$5,001 - $6,000

2

$6,001 - $7,000

1

$7,001 +          


LTC PROPERTIES, INC.

SCHEDULE IV

MORTGAGE LOANS ON REAL ESTATE (Continued)

(in thousands)

    Activity for the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 2012 and 20112012 is as follows:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

For the Year Ended December 31,

 

 

 

2014

 

2013

 

2012

 

Reconciliation of real estate:

    

 

    

    

 

    

    

 

    

 

Carrying cost:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Balance at beginning of period

 

$

937,617 

 

$

900,095 

 

$

725,031 

 

Acquisitions

 

 

11,650 

 

 

19,040 

 

 

166,750 

 

Improvements

 

 

49,912 

 

 

32,008 

 

 

11,219 

 

Conversion of mortgage loans into owned properties

 

 

 —

 

 

— 

 

 

— 

 

Impairment charges

 

 

 —

 

 

— 

 

 

— 

 

Cost of real estate sold

 

 

(49,341)

 

 

(13,526)

 

 

(2,905)

 

Ending balance

 

$

949,838 

 

$

937,617 

 

$

900,095 

 

Accumulated depreciation:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Balance at beginning of period

 

$

218,700 

 

$

198,548 

 

$

178,196 

 

Depreciation expense

 

 

25,424 

 

 

24,568 

 

 

22,002 

 

Conversion of mortgage loans into owned properties

 

 

 —

 

 

— 

 

 

— 

 

Impairment charges

 

 

 —

 

 

— 

 

 

— 

 

Cost of real estate sold

 

 

(20,809)

 

 

(4,416)

 

 

(1,650)

 

Ending balance

 

$

223,315 

 

$

218,700 

 

$

198,548 

 

89


LTC PROPERTIES, INC.

SCHEDULE IV

MORTGAGE LOANS ON REAL ESTATE

(in thousands)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Principal

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Amount of

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Carrying

 

Loans

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Current

 

 

 

 

Amount of

 

Subject to

 

 

 

(Unaudited)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Monthly

 

Face

 

Mortgages

 

Delinquent

 

 

 

Number of

 

                                

 

Final

 

Balloon

 

Debt

 

Amount of

 

December 31,

 

Principal or

 

State

 

Properties

 

Units/Beds(3)

 

Interest Rate(1)

 

Maturity  Date

 

Amount(2)

 

Service

 

Mortgages

 

2013

 

Interest

 

MI

    

15 

    

2,058 

    

9.53%

  

2043

    

$

97,387 

 

$

1,007 

    

$

124,387 

    

$

127,725 

    

$

— 

 

PA

 

 

70 

 

7.11%

  

2016

 

 

5,100 

 

 

31 

 

 

5,100 

 

 

5,100 

 

 

— 

 

TX

 

 

100 

 

10.40%

  

2018

 

 

5,095 

 

 

68 

 

 

6,800 

 

 

5,887 

 

 

— 

 

WI

 

 

106 

 

10.08%

  

2022

 

 

9,437 

 

 

90 

 

 

10,600 

 

 

10,600 

 

 

— 

 

Various

 

15 

 

1,759 

 

7.00%-13.75%

  

2015-2019

 

 

12,615 

 

 

328 

 

 

29,742 

 

 

16,344 

 

 

— 

 

 

 

38 

(4)

4,093 

 

 

 

 

 

$

129,634 

 

$

1,524 

 

$

176,629 

 

$

165,656 

 

$

— 

 


(1)

Represents current stated interest rate. Generally, the loans have 25‑year amortization with principal and interest payable at varying amounts over the life to maturity with annual interest adjustments through specified fixed rate increases effective either on the first anniversary or calendar year of the loan.

(2)

Balloon payment is due upon maturity.

(3)

This number is based upon unit/bed counts shown on operating licenses provided to us by lessees/borrowers or units/beds as stipulated by lease/mortgage documents. We have found during the years that these numbers often differ, usually not materially, from units/beds in operation at any point in time. The differences are caused by such things as operators converting a patient/resident room for alternative uses, such as offices or storage, or converting a multi‑patient room/unit into a single patient room/unit. We monitor our properties on a routine basis through site visits and reviews of current licenses. In an instance where such change would cause a de‑licensing of beds or in our opinion impact the value of the property, we would take action against the lessee/borrower to preserve the value of the property/collateral.

(4)

Includes 19 first‑lien mortgage loans as follows:

Number of Loans

Original loan amounts

11

$ 500 - $2,000

1

$2,001 - $3,000

2

$3,001 - $4,000

1

$4,001 - $5,000

1

$5,001 - $6,000

1

$6,001 - $7,000

2

$7,001 +         

90


Mortgage loans receivable activity for the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012 is as follows:

Balance— December 31, 2011

$

53,081 

New mortgage loans

7,719 

Other additions

— 

Amortization of mortgage premium

(7)

Collections of principal

(21,633)

Foreclosures

— 

Loan loss reserve

139 

Other deductions

— 

Balance— December 31, 2012

39,299 

New mortgage loans

124,387 

Other additions

4,971 

Amortization of mortgage premium

(6)

Collections of principal

(1,933)

Foreclosures

— 

Loan loss reserve

(1,274)

Other deductions

— 

Balance— December 31, 2013

165,444 

New mortgage loans

3,027 

Other additions

6,347 

Amortization of mortgage premium

(5)

Collections of principal

(9,155)

Foreclosures

— 

Loan loss reserve

(2)

Other deductions

— 

Balance— December 31, 2014

$

165,656 

91


Balance—December 31, 2010

 $59,026 

New mortgage loans

   

Other additions

   

Amortization of mortgage premium

  (38)

Collections of principal

  (5,967)

Foreclosures

   

Loan loss reserve

  60 

Other deductions

   
    

Balance—December 31, 2011

  53,081 

New mortgage loans

  7,719 

Other additions

   

Amortization of mortgage premium

  (7)

Collections of principal

  (21,633)

Foreclosures

   

Loan loss reserve

  139 

Other deductions

   
    

Balance—December 31, 2012

  39,299 

New mortgage loans

  124,387 

Other additions

  4,971 

Amortization of mortgage premium

  (6)

Collections of principal

  (1,933)

Foreclosures

   

Loan loss reserve

  (1,274)

Other deductions

   
    

Balance—December 31, 2013

 $165,444 
    
    

Item 9.  CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE

None.

Item 9A.  CONTROLSCONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Disclosure Controls and Procedures.

Our management, with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended) as of the end of the period covered by this report.  Based on such evaluation our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that, as of the end of the period covered by this report our disclosure controls and procedures were effective.

Internal Control overOver Financial Reporting.

The Management Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting and the Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm thereon are set forth on the following pages.

There has been no change in our internal control over financial reporting during the period covered by this report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.reporting.

92


Management  Report on  Internal  Control  Over  Financial Reporting Item 9B.    OTHER INFORMATION

        None.



MANAGEMENT REPORT ON INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING

Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting. Internal control over financial reporting is defined in Rule 13a-15(f)13a‑15(f) or 15d-15(f)15d‑15(f) promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, as a process designed by, or under the supervision of, the issuer'sissuer’s principal executive and principal financial officers and effected by the issuer'sissuer’s board of directors, management and other personnel, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and includes those policies and procedures that:

    Pertain to the maintenance of records that in reasonable detail accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the issuer;

    Provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the issuer are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the issuer; and

    Provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of the issuer's assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

·

Pertain to the maintenance of records that in reasonable detail accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the issuer;

·

Provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the issuer are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the issuer; and

·

Provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of the issuer’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect material misstatements on a timely basis. Projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

Our management, with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, evaluated the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2013.2014. In making this assessment, management used the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (or COSO) in Internal Control—Integrated Framework.Framework (1992 Framework). Based on this assessment, our management concluded that, as of the end of the fiscal year ended December 31, 2012,2014, our internal control over financial reporting was effective.

The effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2013,2014, has been audited by Ernst &Young LLP, independent registered public accounting firm. Ernst & Young LLP'sLLP’s report on our internal control over financial reporting appears on the following page.


93



Report of Independent RegisteredRegistered Public Accounting Firm

To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of LTC Properties, Inc.

We have audited LTC Properties, Inc.'s’s (the "Company"“Company”) internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2013,2014, based on criteria established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (1992 framework) (the COSO criteria). The Company'sCompany’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting, and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting included in the accompanying Management Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company'sCompany’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

A company'scompany’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company'scompany’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of the company'scompany’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

In our opinion, LTC Properties, Inc. maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2013,2014, based on the COSO criteria.

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheets of LTC Properties, Inc. as of December 31, 20132014 and 2012,2013, and the related consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income, equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 20132014 of LTC Properties, Inc. and our report dated February 20, 201426, 2015 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.




/s/ Ernst & Young LLP


Los Angeles, California

February 20, 201426, 2015




94


Item 9B.  OTHER INFORMATION


None.

PART III

Item 10.  DIRECTORS,DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

The information required by this item is incorporated by reference to our definitive proxy statement for the 20142015 Annual Meeting of Stockholders (to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission within 120 days of our December 31, 20132014 fiscal year end) under the headings "Proposal 1 Election of Directors,"  "Corporate Governance Principles and Board Matters," and "Executive Officers."

Item 11.  EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

The information required by this item is incorporated by reference to our definitive proxy statement for the 20142015 Annual Meeting of Stockholders (to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission within 120 days of our December 31, 20132014 fiscal year end) under the headings "Executive Compensation Discussion and Analysis," "” “Summary Compensation Table," "” “Director Compensation," and "Compensation Committee Report."

Item 12.  SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS

The information required by this item is incorporated by reference to our definitive proxy statement for the 20142015 Annual Meeting of Stockholders (to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission within 120 days of our December 31, 20132014 fiscal year end) under the heading "Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters."

Item 13.  CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE

The information required by this item is incorporated by reference to our definitive proxy statement for the 20142015 Annual Meeting of Stockholders (to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission within 120 days of our December 31, 20132014 fiscal year end) under the heading "Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence."

Item 14.  PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES

The information required by this item is incorporated by reference to our definitive proxy statement for the 20142015 Annual Meeting of Stockholders (to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission within 120 days of our December 31, 20132014 fiscal year end) under the heading "Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm Fees and Services."


95



PART IV

Item 15.  EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES

The following documents are filed as a part of this report:


Page

Financial Statements

Page

Financial Statements

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm


53

51

Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 20132014 and 20122013


54

52

Consolidated Statements of Income for the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 2012 and 20112012


55

53

Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income for the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 2012 and 20112012


56

54

Consolidated Statements of Equity for the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 2012 and 20112012


57

55

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 2012 and 20112012


58

56

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements


59

57

Financial Statement Schedules


II. Valuation and Qualifying Accounts


86

84

III. Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation


87

85

IV. Mortgage Loans on Real Estate


92

90

 

All other schedules are omitted because they are not applicable or not present in amounts sufficient to require submission of the schedule or the required information is shown in the Consolidated Financial Statements and the Notes thereto.

Exhibits

The exhibits required by Item 601 of Regulation S-KS‑K are set forth in the index to exhibits of this annual report.


96


LTC PROPERTIES, INC.

INDEX TO EXHIBITS
EXHIBIT
S

Exhibit
Number

Description

Exhibit
Number
Description

3.1

LTC Properties, Inc. Articles of Restatement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to LTC Properties Inc.'s’s Current Report on Form 8-K8‑K (File No. 1-11314)1‑11314) dated September 14, 2012)


3.2



Bylaws of LTC Properties, Inc., as amended and restated August 3, 2009, (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to LTC Properties Inc.'s Form 10-Q (File No. 1-11314) for the quarter ended June 30, 2009)as further amended February 10, 2015 


10.1



Amended and Restated Credit Agreement dated as of April 18, 2011 among LTC Properties, Inc. and Bank of Montreal, Chicago Branch as Administrative Agent, BMO Capital Markets, as Co-Lead Arranger and Joint Book Runner, and Key Bank National Association, as Syndication Agent, and KeyBanc Capital Markets, Inc., as Co-Lead Arranger and Joint Book RunnerOctober 14, 2014 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to LTC Properties Inc.'s’s Current Report on Form 8-K8‑K (File No. 1-11314)1‑11314) dated April 19, 2011)October 14, 2014)


10.2



First Amendment to Credit Agreement dated as of May 25, 2012 among LTC Properties, Inc. and the Guarantors party thereto and Bank of Montreal, Chicago Branch as Administrative Agent, BMO Capital Markets, as Co-Lead Arranger and Joint Book Runner, and Key Bank National Association, as Syndication Agent, and KeyBanc Capital Markets, Inc., as Co-Lead Arranger and Joint Book Runner (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to LTC Properties Inc.'s Current Report on Form 8-K dated (File No. 1-11314) May 30, 2012)

10.3


Second Amended and Restated Note Purchase and Private Shelf Agreement dated October 30, 2013 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to LTC Properties Inc.'s’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q10‑Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2013)


10.4

10.3+



Note Purchase

Employment Agreement of Wendy Simpson dated July 19, 2012November 12, 2014 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to LTC Properties, Inc.’s Current Report on Form 8‑K (File No. 1‑11314) dated November 12, 2014)

10.4+

Employment Agreement of Pamela Kessler, effective as of November 12, 2014 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to LTC Properties, Inc.’s Current Report on Form 8‑K (File No. 1‑11314) dated November 12, 2014)

10.5+

Employment Agreement of Clint Malin, effective as of November 12, 2014 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to LTC Properties, Inc.'s Quarterly’s Current Report on Form 10-Q8‑K (File No. 1-11314) for the quarter ended June 30, 2012)1‑11314) dated November 12, 2014)


10.5+

10.6+



Third Amendment to the 2007 Amended and Restated

Employment Agreement of Wendy Simpson dated December 4, 2007Caroline (Wong) Chikhale, effective as of June 10, 2008 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.110.9 to LTC Properties, Inc.'s Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 1-11314) dated December 5, 2007)


10.6+


Third Amended and Restated Employment Agreement of Pamela Kessler, effective as of December 4, 2007 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.13 to LTC Properties, Inc.'s’s Annual Report on Form 10-K (File No. 1-11314) for the year ended December 31, 2007)2013)


10.7+



Second Amended and Restated Employment Agreement of Clint Malin, effective as of December 4, 2007 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.15 to LTC Properties, Inc.'s Annual Report on Form 10-K (File No. 1-11314) for the year ended December 31, 2007)

10.8+


Amended and Restated Employment Agreement of T. Andrew Stokes, effective as of December 4, 2007 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.16 to LTC Properties, Inc.'s Annual Report on Form 10-K (File No. 1-11314) for the year ended December 31, 2007)

10.9+


Employment Agreement of Caroline L. (Wong) Chikhale, effective as of June 10, 2008

10.10+


Second Amended and Restated Employment Agreement of Peter G. Lyew, effective as of December 4, 2007 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.10 to LTC Properties, Inc.’s Annual Report on Form 10-K (File No. 1-11314) for the year ended December 31, 2013)


10.11

10.8+



Employment Agreement of Brent Chappell, effective as of June 10, 2013

10.9+

Annual Cash Bonus Incentive Plan, effective as of October 27, 2014

10.10

The 2008 Equity Participation Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.8 to LTC Properties, Inc.'s’s Annual Report on Form 10-K10‑K (File No. 1-11314)1‑11314) for the year ended December 31, 2009)


Exhibit
Number
Description
10.12

10.11

Form of Stock Option Agreement under the 2008 Equity Participation Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.9 to LTC Properties, Inc.'s’s Annual Report on Form 10-K10‑K (File No. 1-11314)1‑11314) for the year ended December 31, 2009)


10.13

10.12



Form of Restricted Stock Agreement under the 2008 Equity Participation Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to LTC Properties, Inc.'s’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q10‑Q (File No. 1-11314)1‑11314) for the quarter ended June 30, 2013)


10.14

10.13



Form of Indemnity Agreement dated as of July 30, 2009 between LTC Properties, Inc. and its Directors and Officers (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to LTC Properties, Inc.'s’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q10‑Q (File No. 1-11314)1‑11314) for the quarter ended June 30, 2009)


12



Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges


21



List of Subsidiaries


23.1



Consent of Independent Registered Accounting Firm


31.1



Certification of the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-OxleySarbanes‑Oxley Act of 2002


31.2



Certification of the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-OxleySarbanes‑Oxley Act of 2002


32



Certifications pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleySarbanes‑Oxley Act of 2002


101



The following materials from LTC Properties, Inc.'s’s Form Annual Report on 10-K10‑K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013,2014, formatted in eXtensible Business Reporting Language (XBRL): (i) Consolidated Balance Sheets; (ii) Consolidated Statements of Income and Comprehensive Income; (iii) Consolidated Statements of Equity; (iv) Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows; and (v) Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements


+

Management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement in which an executive officer or director of the Company participates

97


LTC PROPERTIES, INC.

SIGNATURES

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

LTC PROPERTIES, INC.

Registrant


Dated: February 20, 201426, 2015





By:

By:

/s/ PAMELA SHELLEY-KESSLER


Pamela Kessler

PAMELA SHELLEY-KESSLER
KESSLER

Executive Vice President, Chief Financial

Officer and Corporate Secretary

(Principal Financial Officer)

 

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

/s/ Wendy L. Simpson

WENDY L. SIMPSON


WENDY L. SIMPSON

Chairman, Chief Executive Officer,

President and Director

(Principal Executive Officer)

February 20, 201426, 2015


/s/ Pamela Kessler

PAMELA SHELLEY-KESSLER


PAMELA SHELLEY-KESSLERKESSLER



Executive Vice President, Chief Financial

Officer and Corporate Secretary

(Principal Financial Officer and Principal

Accounting Officer)



February 20, 201426, 2015


/s/ BOYD HENDRICKSON

BOYD HENDRICKSON



Director


February 20, 2014


/s/ Boyd Hendrickson

BOYD HENDRICKSON

Director

February 26, 2015

/s/ Devra G. Shapiro

DEVRA G. SHAPIRO


DEVRA G. SHAPIRO


Director


Director


February 20, 201426, 2015


/s/ Edmund C. King

EDMUND C. KING


EDMUND C. KING


Director


Director


February 20, 201426, 2015


/s/ TIMOTHYJAMES J. TRICHE
P


IECZYNSKI

JAMES PIECZYNSKI

Director

February 26, 2015

/s/ Timothy J. Triche

TIMOTHY TRICHE


Director


Director


February 20, 201426, 2015


98