Use these links to rapidly review the document
Table of ContentsTABLE OF CONTENTS1
WADDELL & REED FINANCIAL, INC. Index to Consolidated Financial StatementsTABLE OF CONTENTS2

Table of Contents

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549



FORM 10-K

ý    Annual report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 20132014

OR

o    Transition report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

Commission file number 001-13913

WADDELL & REED FINANCIAL, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Delaware
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
 51-0261715
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)

6300 Lamar Avenue
Overland Park, Kansas 66202
913-236-2000
(Address, including zip code, and telephone number of Registrant's principal executive offices)



SECURITIES REGISTERED PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(b) OF THE ACT

Title of each class Name of each exchange on which registered
Class A Common Stock, $.01 par value New York Stock Exchange



SECURITIES REGISTERED PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(g) OF THE ACT:

None
(Title of class)

        Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.    YES ý    NO o

        Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act.    YES o    NO ý.

        Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    Yes ý    No o.

        Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).    Yes ý    No o.

        Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendments to this Form 10-K.    (    )o

        Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).

Large accelerated Filer ý Accelerated Filer o
Non-accelerated Filer o Smaller Reporting Company o
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)

        Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined by Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).    Yes o    No ý.

        The aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common stock equity held by non-affiliates (i.e. persons other than officers, directors and stockholders holding greater than 5% of the registrant's common stock) based on the closing sale price on June 28, 201330, 2014 was $2.88$5.13 billion.

        Shares outstanding of each of the registrant's classes of common stock as of February 19, 201413, 2015 Class A common stock, $.01 par value: 84,856,62183,564,556

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

        In Part III of this Form 10-K, portions of the definitive proxy statement for the 20142015 Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held April 16, 2014.15, 2015.

   


Index of Exhibits (Pages 8689 through 90)93)
Total Number of Pages Included Are 9093


Table of Contents

WADDELL & REED FINANCIAL, INC.
INDEX TO ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 20132014

 
  
 Page 

Part I

 

 

    

Item 1.

 

Business

  3 

Item 1A.

 

Risk Factors

  11 

Item 1B.

 

Unresolved Staff Comments

  1718 

Item 2.

 

Properties

  1718 

Item 3.

 

Legal Proceedings

  1718 

Item 4.

 

Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders

  1718 

Part II

 

 

  
 
 

Item 5.

 

Market for Registrant's Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

  1819 

Item 6.

 

Selected Financial Data

  2122 

Item 7.

 

Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

  2223 

Item 7A.

 

Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

  4344 

Item 8.

 

Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

  4445 

Item 9.

 

Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure

  4445 

Item 9A.

 

Controls and Procedures

  4445 

Item 9B.

 

Other Information

  4748 

Part III

 

 

  
 
 

Item 10.

 

Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance

  4748 

Item 11.

 

Executive Compensation

  4748 

Item 12.

 

Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters

  4748 

Item 13.

 

Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence

  4749 

Item 14.

 

Principal Accounting Fees and Services

  4749 

Part IV

 

 

  
 
 

Item 15.

 

Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules

  4749 


SIGNATURES


 

 

4850

 

INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

  4951 

INDEX TO EXHIBITS

  8689 

Table of Contents


PART I

ITEM 1.    Business

General

        Waddell & Reed Financial, Inc. (hereinafter referred to as the "Company," "we," "our" or "us") is a corporation, incorporated in the state of Delaware in 1981, that conducts business through its subsidiaries. Founded in 1937, we are one of the oldest mutual fund complexes in the United States, having introduced the Waddell & Reed Advisors Groupgroup of Mutual Fundsmutual funds (the "Advisors Funds") in 1940. Over time we added additional mutual fund families: Ivy Funds (the "Ivy Funds"), Ivy Funds Variable Insurance Portfolios ("Ivy Funds VIP") and, InvestEd Portfolios, our 529 college savings plan ("InvestEd") (collectively, the Advisors Funds, Ivy Funds, Ivy Funds VIP and InvestEd are referred to as the "Funds") and the Selector Management Fund SICAV and its Ivy Global Investors sub-funds, an undertaking for the collective investment in transferable securities (the "Selector Management Funds" or "UCITS"). As of December 31, 2013,2014, we had $126.5$123.7 billion in assets under management.

        We derive our revenues from providing investment management, investment advisory, investment product underwriting and distribution, and shareholder services administration to mutual fundsthe Funds and the Selector Management Funds and institutional and separately managed accounts. Investment management fees are based on the amount of average assets under management and are affected by sales levels, financial market conditions, redemptions and the composition of assets. Our underwriting and distribution revenues consist of Rule 12b-1 asset-based service and distribution fees, fees earned on fee-based asset allocation products and related advisory services, commissions derived from sales of investment and insurance products and distribution fees on certain variable products. The products sold have various commission structures and the revenues received from those sales vary based on the type and dollar amount sold. Shareholder service fee revenue includes transfer agency fees, custodian fees from retirement plan accounts, and portfolio accounting and administration fees, and is earned based on assets under management or number of client accounts.

        We operate our business through three distincta balanced distribution channels.network. Our retail products are distributed through third-partiesthird parties such as other broker/dealers, registered investment advisors and various retirement platforms, (collectively, the "Wholesale channel") or through our sales force of independent financial advisors (the "Advisors channel"). We also market our investment advisory services to institutional investors, either directly or through consultants (the "Institutional channel").

        Our Wholesale channel efforts include retail fund distribution through broker/dealers (the primary method of distributing mutual funds for the industry), registered investment advisors (fee-based financial advisors who generally sell mutual funds through financial supermarkets) and retirement and insurance platforms. Assets under management in this channel were $67.1$60.3 billion at the end of 2013.2014.

        In the Advisors channel, our sales force focuses its efforts primarily on financial planning, serving mostly middle class and mass affluent clients. We compete with smaller broker/dealers and independent financial advisors, as well as a span of other financial service providers. Assets under management in this channel were $43.7$45.5 billion at December 31, 2013.2014.

        Through our Institutional channel, we serve as sub-advisorsubadvisor for domestic and foreign distributors of investment products for pension funds, Taft-Hartley plans and endowments. Additionally, we serve as investment advisor and distributor of the Selector Management Funds. Assets under management in the Institutional channel were $15.8$17.8 billion at December 31, 2013.2014.

Organization

        We operate our investment advisory business through our subsidiary companies, primarily Waddell & Reed Investment Management Company ("WRIMCO"), a registered investment adviser for the Advisor


Table of Contents

Funds, the Ivy Funds VIP and InvestEd, and Ivy Investment Management Company ("IICO"), the registered investment adviser for the Ivy Funds and the Selector Management Funds.

        Our underwriting and distribution business operates through two broker/dealers: Waddell & Reed, Inc. ("W&R") and Ivy Funds Distributor, Inc. ("IFDI"). W&R is a registered broker/dealer and investment adviser that acts primarily as the national distributor and underwriter for shares of the Advisors Funds, Ivy Funds VIP, InvestEd and other mutual funds, and as a distributor of variable annuities and other insurance products issued by


Table of Contents

our business partners. In addition, W&R is the eighthseventh largest distributor of ourthe Ivy Funds. IFDI is the distributor and underwriter for the Ivy Funds and serves as the global distributor of the Selector Management Funds.

        In 2012, the Company signed a definitive agreement to sell its Legend group of subsidiaries ("Legend") and the sale closed effective January 1, 2013. Legend was our mutual fund distribution and retirement planning subsidiary based in Palm Beach Gardens, Florida. Through its network of financial advisors, Legend primarily served employees of school districts and other not-for-profit organizations. Legend Advisory Corporation, the registered investment adviser for the Legend, group, and Legend Equities Corporation, a registered broker/dealer ("LEC"), were among the subsidiaries sold.

        Waddell & Reed Services Company ("WRSCO") provides transfer agency and accounting services to the Advisors Funds, Ivy Funds, Ivy Funds VIP and InvestEd.Funds. W&R, WRIMCO, WRSCO, IICO and IFDI are hereafter collectively referred to as the "Company," "we," "us" or "our" unless the context requires otherwise.

Investment Management Operations

        Our investment advisory business provides one of our largest sources of revenues and profits.revenues. We earn investment management fee revenues by providing investment advisory and management services pursuant to investment management agreements with each fund within the Advisors Funds family,and the Ivy Funds family, the Ivy Funds VIP family, and InvestEd (collectively, the "Funds").Selector Management Funds. While the specific terms of the agreements vary, the basic terms are similar. The agreements provide that we render overall investment management services to each of the Funds, subject to the oversight of each Fund's board of trustees and in accordance with each Fund's investment objectives and policies. The agreements permit us to enter into separate agreements for shareholder services or accounting services with each respective Fund.

        Each Fund's board of trustees, including a majority of the trustees who are not "interested persons" of the Fund or the Company within the meaning of the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the "ICA") ("disinterested members") and the Fund's shareholders must approve the investment management agreement between the respective Fund and the Company. These agreements may continue in effect from year to year if specifically approved at least annually by (i) the Fund's board, including a majority of the disinterested members, or (ii) the vote of a majority of both the shareholders of the Fund and the disinterested members of each Fund's board, each vote being cast in person at a meeting called for such purpose. Each agreement automatically terminates in the event of its assignment, as defined by the ICA or the Investment Advisers Act of 1940, as amended (the "Advisers Act"), and may be terminated without penalty by any Fund by giving us 60 days' written notice if the termination has been approved by a majority of the Fund's trustees or the Fund's shareholders. We may terminate an investment management agreement without penalty on 120 days' written notice.

        In addition to performing investment management services for the Funds, we act as an investment adviser for institutional and other private investors and we provide subadvisory services to other investment companies. Such services are provided pursuant to various written agreements and our fees are generally based on a percentage of assets under management.


Table of Contents

        Our investment management team meets every morningbegins each business day in a collaborative settingdiscussion that fosters idea sharing, yet reinforces individual accountability. Through all market cycles, we remain dedicated to the following investment principles:


Table of Contents

        These three principles shape our investment philosophy and money management approach. Over seven decades,For nearly 80 years, our investment organization has delivered consistently competitive investment performance. Through bull and bear markets, our investment professionals have not strayed from what works —works—fundamental research and a time-tested investment process and fundamental research.process. We believe investors turn to us because they appreciate that our investment approach continues to identify and create opportunities for wealth creation.

        Our investment management team comprises 8287 professionals, including 2933 portfolio managers who average 22 years of industry experience and 16 years of tenure with our firm. We have significant experience in virtually all major asset classes, several specialized asset classes and a range of investment styles. At December 31, 2013,2014, over 80% of the Company's $126.5$123.7 billion in assets under management were invested in equities, of which 68%80% was domestic and 32%20% was international. In recent years, we have supported growth of international investments by adding investment professionals native to countries that we consider emerging markets. They, along with other members of the investment team, focus on understanding foreign markets and capturing investment opportunities. Our investment management team also includes subadvisors who bring similar investment philosophies and additional expertise in specific asset classes.

Investment Management Products

        Our mutual fund families offer a wide variety of investment options. We are the exclusive underwriter and distributor of 86 registered open-end mutual fund portfolios in the Advisors Funds,Funds. Additionally, we have one closed-end offering through the Ivy Funds Ivyand offer the Selector Management Funds VIP and InvestEd.through our Institutional channel. The Advisors Funds, variable products offering the Ivy Funds VIP, and InvestEd are offered primarily through our financial advisors;advisors in the Advisors channel; in some circumstances, certain of thesethose funds are also offered through the Wholesale channel. The Ivy Funds are offered through both our Wholesale channel and Advisors channel. The Funds' assets under management are included in either our Wholesale channel or our Advisors channel depending on which channel marketed the client account or is the broker of record.

        During 2013,2014, we completed the initial public offeringmerger of two open-end mutual funds and added two open-end mutual funds to our first closed-end mutual fund,product line. Ivy Funds merged the Ivy HighAsset Strategy Opportunities Fund into the Ivy Emerging Markets Equity Fund, creating a fund that offers investors a single fund for emerging-market equity investments in any region of the world. We launched the Ivy Emerging Markets Local Currency Debt Fund, subadvised by Pictet Asset Management. This fund provides investors the opportunity to capture fixed income opportunities from a select group of emerging market economies. The fund invests primarily in sovereign debt securities issued in the local currencies of emerging market countries. We also launched the Ivy Mid Cap Income Opportunities Fund. This fund, which trades under the symbol "IVH" on the New York Stock Exchange, raised $317.0 million in its common share offering, and an additional $14.0 million related to the exercise of the underwriters' option to purchase additional shares. The fund's investment objective is to seek to provide total return through a combination of a high level of current income and capital appreciation. The fund seeks to achieve its objectiveappreciation by investing primarily in high yield corporate bondsa diversified portfolio of varying maturities, secured loans and other corporate fixed income instruments.

        We also added two open-end mutual funds to our product line in 2013 to help investors and financial advisors pursue the opportunity of investment in real estate securities. We launched the Ivy Global Real Estate Fund and Ivy Global Risk-Managed Real Estate Fund, both subadvised by LaSalle Investment Management Securities. Both funds seek to provide total return through long-term capital appreciation and current income. Under normal circumstances, the funds invest at least 80% of net assets in securities of companies in the real estate or real estate-related industries, primarily in equity and equity-related securities. These securities includeincome-producing common stocks rights or warrants to purchase common stocks, securities convertible into common stocks and preferred stocks. The funds do not directly invest in real estate. The funds are non-diversified, meaning that they may invest a significant portion of total assets in a limited number of issuers.

        In 2013, we launched the following Ivy VIP Pathfinder funds (fund of funds with Ivy VIP Funds as the underlying funds): Moderate Managed Volatility, Moderately Aggressive Managed Volatility andmanagement team believes demonstrates favorable


Table of Contents

Moderately Conservative Managed Volatility.prospects for total return. The addition of these fundsfund intends to our portfolio enables usfocus primarily on mid-capitalization companies believed to include a volatility management feature within certain funds offered underhave the Pathfinder name, which we believe enhances our ongoing competitiveness in products we make available within variable insurance contracts.ability to sustain and potentially increase dividends while providing capital appreciation over the long-term.

        We also internalizedcompleted a fund adoption transaction agreement in 2014 with Emerging Managers Group, L.P. through which IICO assumed responsibility as investment adviser and IFDI serves as global distributor of the Selector Management Funds. The Selector Management Funds included in the fund adoption transaction are the Ivy Global Investors Asset Strategy Fund and the Ivy Global Investors High Income Fund. Subsequent to the fund adoption transaction we launched the following sub-funds: Ivy Global Investors Mid Cap Growth Fund, Ivy Global Investors Large Cap Growth Fund and Ivy Global Investors Science & Technology Fund. This transaction allows us to serve the non-U.S. resident customer market through national broker/dealer firms in the United States and establish greater international distribution of our investment management capabilities.

        In 2014, we launched the R6 share class for the majority of the Ivy Global Natural Resources FundFunds to meet the needs of our retirement and Ivy VIP Global Natural Resources Fund effective July 2, 2013. These funds were previously subadvised by Mackenzie Financial Corporation.benefit plan clients. The share class does not charge any sales load or Rule 12b-1 expenses.

Other Products

        We offer our Advisors channel customers fee-based asset allocation investment advisory products, including Managed Allocation Portfolio ("MAP"), MAPPlus and Strategic Portfolio Allocation ("SPA"), which utilize ourthe Funds. As of December 31, 2013,2014, clients had $14.4$17.3 billion invested in our fee-based asset allocation investment advisory products. These assets areproducts, of which $15.7 billion is invested in our mutual funds and included in our mutual fund assets under management.

        In our Advisors channel, we distribute various business partners' variable annuity products, which offer the Ivy Funds VIP as an investment vehicle. We also offer our Advisors channel customers retirement and life insurance products underwritten by our business partners. Through our insurance agency subsidiaries,subsidiary, our financial advisors also sell life insurance and disability products underwritten by various carriers.

Distribution Channels

        We distribute our investment products through the Wholesale, Advisors and Institutional channels. During 2013,2014, our Asset Strategy funds continued to play a lead role in the Company's results, comprising 29%25% of the Company's gross sales and 34%29% of the assets under management as of December 31, 2013.2014. While we recognize the past success of these funds, we are also aware of the concentration risks to our revenue streams created by the size of these funds, despite the flexible mandate. Over the past several years, our distribution channels have successfully marketed additional products to their clients, which resulted incontributed to total sales for the Asset Strategy funds decreasing from 46% in 2010 to 29%25% in 2013.2014. Over the same time period, fixed income sales have grown from 13% to 29%26%. We plan to continue to stress diversification of sales in 2014.2015.

Wholesale Channel

        Our Wholesale channel generates sales through various third-partythird party distribution outlets. Our assets under management in the Wholesale channel were $67.1$60.3 billion at December 31, 2013,2014, including $0.5$0.6 billion in assets subadvised by other managers.

        Our team of 5059 external wholesalers lead our wholesaling efforts, which focus principally on distributing the Ivy Funds through three segments: broker/dealers (the largest method of distributing mutual funds for the industry and for us), retirement platforms (401(k) platforms using multiple managers) and registered investment advisors (fee-based financial advisors who generally sell mutual funds through financial supermarkets). Additionally, our National Accounts team, comprised of 1718 employees, work with the home offices of our distribution partners managing current and new relationships.


Table of Contents

Advisors Channel

        Assets under management in the Advisors channel were $43.7$45.5 billion at December 31, 2013. Historically,2014. Throughout our history, our advisors have sold investment products primarily to middle income and mass affluent individuals, families and businesses across the country in geographic markets of all sizes. We assist clients on a wide range of financial issues with a significant focus on helping them plan, generally, for long-term investments such as retirement and education, and offer one-on-one consultations that emphasize long-term relationships through continued service. As a result of this approach, this channel has developed


Table of Contents

a loyal customer base with clients maintaining their accounts significantly longer than the industry average. Over the past several years, we have expanded our Choice brokerage platform technology and offerings, which enable us to competitively recruit experienced advisors.

        As of December 31, 2013,2014, our sales force consisted of 1,7461,766 financial advisors who operate out of offices located throughout the United States. We believe, based on industry data, that our financial advisors are currently one of the largest sales forces in the United States selling primarily mutual funds, and that W&R, our broker/dealer subsidiary, ranks among the largest independent broker/dealers. As of December 31, 2013, our Advisors channel had approximately 477 thousand mutual fund customers.

        Over the past several years, we have instituted more stringent production requirements for ourWe continue to experience growth in sales force which has resulted in a decline in our number of advisors. However, gross sales have not declined, and this channel produced 16% more in 2013 with fewer advisors, on average, compared to 2012.production. Advisors channel underwriting and distribution fee revenues per the average number of advisors were $254 thousand, $215 thousand $180 thousand and $165$180 thousand for the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012, and 2011, respectively. As of December 31, 2014, our Advisors channel had approximately 465 thousand mutual fund customers.

Institutional Channel

        Through this channel, we manage assets in a variety of investment styles for a variety of institutions. The largest client type is other asset managers that hire us to act as subadvisor; they are typically domestic and foreign distributors of investment products who lack scale or the track record to manage internally, or choose to market multi-manager styles. Over time, the Institutional channel has been successful in developing subadvisory relationships, and as of December 31, 2013,2014, subadvisory business comprised more than 70% of the Institutional channel's assets. Our diverse client list also includes the Selector Management Funds, pension funds, Taft-Hartley plans and endowments. Assets under management in the Institutional channel were $15.8$17.8 billion at December 31, 2013.2014.

Service Agreements

        We earn service fee revenues by providing various services to the Funds and their shareholders. Pursuant to the shareholder servicing agreements, we perform shareholder servicing functions for which the Funds pay us a monthly fee, including: maintaining shareholder accounts; issuing, transferring and redeeming shares; distributing dividends and paying redemptions; furnishing information related to the Funds; and handling shareholder inquiries. Pursuant to the accounting service agreements, we provide the Funds with bookkeeping and accounting services and assistance for which the Funds pay us a monthly fee, including: maintaining the Funds' records; pricing Fund shares; and preparing prospectuses for existing shareholders, proxy statements and certain other shareholder reports.

        Agreements with the Funds may be adopted or amended with the approval of the disinterested members of each Fund's board of trustees and have annually renewable terms of one year.

Competition

        The financial services industry is a highly competitive global industry. According to the Investment Company Institute, or ICI, at the end of 20132014 there were more than 8,9009,200 open-end investment companies and more than 600500 closed-end investment companies of varying sizes, investment policies and objectives whose shares are being offered to the public in the United States alone. Factors affecting our business include brand recognition, business reputation, investment performance, quality of service and the continuity of both client relationships and assets under management. A majority of mutual fund sales go to funds that are highly rated by a small number of well-known ranking services that focus on investment


Table of Contents

performance. Competition is based on distribution methods, the type and quality of shareholder services, the success of marketing efforts, and the ability to develop investment products for certain market segments to meet the changing needs of investors, and to achievethe achievement of competitive investment management performance.

        We compete with hundreds of other mutual fund management, distribution and service companies that distribute their fund shares through a variety of methods, including affiliated and unaffiliated sales


Table of Contents

forces, broker/dealers and direct sales to the public of shares offered at a low or no sales charge. Many larger mutual fund complexes have significant advertising budgets and established relationships with brokerage houses with large distribution networks, which enable these fund complexes to reach broad client bases. Many investment management firms offer services and products similar to ours, as well as other independent financial advisors. We also compete with brokerage and investment banking firms, insurance companies, commercial banks and other financial institutions and businesses offering other financial products in all aspects of their businesses. Although no single company or group of companies consistently dominates the mutual fund management and services industry, many are larger than us, have greater resources and offer a wider array of financial services and products. Barriers to entry into the investment management business are relatively few, and thus, we face a potentially growing number of competitors, especially during periods of strong financial and economic markets.

        The distribution of mutual funds and other investment products has undergone significant developments in recent years, which has intensified the competitive environment in which we operate. These developments include the introduction of new products, increasingly complex distribution systems with multiple classes of shares, the development of internet websites providing investors with the ability to invest on-line, the introduction of sophisticated technological platforms used by financial advisors to sell and service mutual funds for their clients, the introduction of separately managed accounts—previously available only to institutional investors—to individuals, and growth in the number of mutual funds offered.

        We believe we effectively compete across multiple dimensions of the asset management and broker/dealer businesses. First, we market our products, primarily the Ivy Funds family, to unaffiliated broker/dealers and advisors and compete against other asset managers offering mutual fund products. This distribution method allows us to move beyond proprietary distribution and increases our potential pool of clients. Competition is based on sales techniques, personal relationships and skills, and the quality of financial planning products and services offered. We compete against asset managers that are both larger and smaller than our firm, but we believe that the breadth and depth of our products position us to compete in this environment. Second, our proprietary broker/dealer consists of a sales force of independent contractors affiliated with our companyCompany who have access to our proprietary financial products. We believe our business model targets customers seeking personal assistance from financial advisors or planners where the primary competition is companies distributing products through financial advisors. The market for financial advice is extremely broad and fragmented. Our financial advisors compete primarily with large and small broker/dealers, independent financial advisors, registered investment advisors, financial institutions and insurance representatives. Finally, we compete in the institutional marketplace, working with consultants who select asset managers for various opportunities, as well as working directly with plan sponsors, foundations, endowments, sovereign funds and other asset managers who hire subadvisors. In this marketplace, we compete with a broad range of asset managers.

        We also face competition in attracting and retaining qualified financial advisors and employees. To maximize our ability to compete effectively in our business, we offer competitive compensation.

Regulation

        The securities industry is subject to extensive regulation and virtually all aspects of our business are subject to various federal and state laws and regulations. These laws and regulations are primarily intended to protect investment advisory clients and shareholders of registered investment companies. Under such laws and regulations, agencies and organizations that regulate investment advisers, broker/dealers, and


Table of Contents

transfer agents like us have broad administrative powers, including the power to limit, restrict or prohibit an investment adviser, broker/dealer or transfer agent from carrying on its business in the event that it fails to comply with applicable laws and regulations. In such event, the possible sanctions that may be imposed include, but are not limited to, the suspension of individual employees or agents, limitations on engaging in certain lines of business for specified periods of time, censures, fines and the revocation of investment adviser and other registrations.


Table of Contents

        The United States Securities and Exchange Commission (the "SEC") is the federal agency responsible for the administration of federal securities laws. Certain of our subsidiaries are registered with the SEC as investment advisers under the Advisers Act, which imposes numerous obligations on registered investment advisers including, among other things, fiduciary duties, record-keeping and reporting requirements, operational requirements and disclosure obligations, as well as general anti-fraud prohibitions. Investment advisers are subject to periodic examination by the SEC, and the SEC is authorized to institute proceedings and impose sanctions for violations of the Advisers Act, ranging from censure to termination of an investment adviser's registration.

        Our Funds are registered as investment companies with the SEC under the ICA, and various filings are made with states under applicable state rules and regulations. The ICA regulates the relationship between a mutual fund and its investment adviser and prohibits or severely restricts principal transactions and joint transactions. Various regulations cover certain investment strategies that may be used by the Funds for hedging and/or speculative purposes. To the extent the Funds purchase futures contracts, options on futures contracts, swaps and foreign currency contracts, they are subject to the commodities and futures regulations of the Commodity Futures Trading Commission.

        We derive a large portion of our revenues from investment management agreements. Under the Advisers Act, our investment management agreements terminate automatically if assigned without the client's consent. Under the ICA, investment advisory agreements with registered investment companies, such as the Funds, terminate automatically upon assignment. The term "assignment" is broadly defined and includes direct assignments, as well as assignments that may be deemed to occur, under certain circumstances, upon the transfer, directly or indirectly, of a controlling interest in the Company.

        The Company is also subject to federal and state laws affecting corporate governance, including the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, as well as rules adopted by the SEC. Our report on internal controls over financial reporting for 20132014 is included in Part I, Item 9A.

        As a publicly traded company, we are also subject to the rules of the New York Stock Exchange (the "NYSE"), the exchange on which our stock is listed, including the corporate governance listing standards approved by the SEC.

        Two of our subsidiaries, W&R and IFDI, are registered as broker/dealers with the SEC and the states. A third broker/dealer subsidiary, LEC, was sold effective January 1, 2013. Much of the broker/dealer regulation has been delegated by the SEC to self-regulatory organizations, principally the Municipal Securities Rulemaking Board and the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority ("FINRA"), which is the primary regulator of our broker/dealer activities. These self-regulatory organizations adopt rules (subject to approval by the SEC) that govern the industry and conduct periodic examinations of our operations over which they have jurisdiction. Securities firms are also subject to regulation by state securities administrators in those states in which they conduct business. Broker/dealers are subject to regulations that cover all aspects of the securities business, including sales practices, market making and trading among broker/dealers, the use and safekeeping of clients' funds and securities, capital structure, record-keeping, and the conduct of directors, officers and employees. Violation of applicable regulations can result in the revocation of broker/dealer licenses, the imposition of censures or fines, and the suspension or expulsion of a firm, its officers or employees.


Table of Contents

        W&R IFDI and LECIFDI are each subject to certain net capital requirements pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act"). Uniform Net Capital Rule 15c3-1 of the Exchange Act (the "Net Capital Rule") specifies the minimum level of net capital a registered broker/dealer must maintain and also requires that part of its assets be kept in a relatively liquid form. The Net Capital Rule is designed to ensure the financial soundness and liquidity of broker/dealers. Any failure to maintain the required minimum net capital may subject us to suspension or revocation of our registration or other limitations on our activity by the SEC, and suspension or expulsion by FINRA or other regulatory bodies, and ultimately could require the broker/dealer's liquidation. The maintenance of minimum net


Table of Contents

capital requirements may also limit our ability to pay dividends. As of December 31, 2013, 20122014 and 2011,2013, net capital for W&R and IFDI exceeded all minimum requirements. As of December 31, 2012 and 2011, net capital for LEC exceeded the minimum requirements.

        Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Investor Protection Act of 1970, W&R is a member of the Securities Investor Protection Corporation (the "SIPC"). IFDI is exempt from the membership requirements and is not a member of the SIPC. The SIPC provides protection against lost, stolen or missing securities (but not loss in value due to a rise or fall in market prices) for clients in the event of the failure of a broker/dealer. Accounts are protected up to $500,000 per client with a limit of $100,000 for cash balances. However, since the Funds, and not our broker/dealer subsidiaries, maintain customer accounts, SIPC protection would not cover mutual fund shareholders whose accounts are maintained directly with the Funds.Funds, but would apply to brokerage accounts held on our brokerage platform.

        Title III of the USA PATRIOT Act, the International Money Laundering Abatement and Anti-Terrorist Financing Act of 2001, imposes significant anti-money laundering requirements on all financial institutions, including domestic banks and domestic operations of foreign banks, broker/dealers, futures commission merchants and investment companies.

        Our operations outside the United States are subject to the laws and regulations of various non-U.S. jurisdictions and non-U.S. regulatory agencies and bodies, including the regulation of the Selector Management Funds by Luxembourg's Commission de Surveillance du Secteur Financier as UCITS. As we broaden our distribution globally, we will become subject to increased international regulations, some of which are comparable to the regulations to which our United States operations are subject. Similar to the United States, non-U.S. regulatory agencies have broad authority in the event of non-compliance with laws and regulations.

        Our businesses may be materially affected not only by regulations applicable to us as an investment adviser, broker/dealer or transfer agent, but also by law and regulations of general application. For example, the volume of our principal investment advisory business in a given time period could be affected by, among other things, existing and proposed tax legislation and other governmental regulations and policies (including the interest rate policies of the Federal Reserve Board), and changes in the interpretation or enforcement of existing laws and rules that affect the business and financial communities.

Intellectual Property

        We regard our names as material to our business, and have registered certain service marks associated with our business with the United States Patent and Trademark Office.

Employees

        At December 31, 20132014 we had 1,5251,648 full-time employees, consisting of 1,2031,314 home office employees and 322334 employees responsible for advisor field supervision and administration.

Available Information

        We file reports, proxy statements, and other information with the SEC, copies of which can be obtained from the SEC's Public Reference Room at 100 F Street NE, Room 1580, Washington, D.C. 20549. Information on the operation of the Public Reference Room can be obtained by calling the SEC at 1-800-732-0330.

        Reports we file electronically with the SEC via the SEC's Electronic Data Gathering, Analysis and Retrieval system ("EDGAR") may be accessed through the internet. The SEC maintains an internet site that contains reports, proxy and information statements, and other information regarding issuers that file electronically with the SEC, atwww.sec.gov. The Company makesmake available free of charge our proxy statements, annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q,10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K and amendments to those reports under the "Reports & SEC Filings" menu on the "Investor Relations" section of our internet website atwww.waddell.com as soon as it is reasonably practical after such filing has been made with the SEC.


Table of Contents

        Also available on the "Corporate Governance" page in the "Our Firm" dropdown menu is information on corporate governance. Stockholders can view our Corporate Code of Business Conduct and Ethics (the "Code of Ethics"), which applies to directors, officers and all employees of the Company, our Corporate Governance Guidelines, and the charters of key committees (including the Audit, Compensation, and Nominating and Corporate Governance Committees). Printed copies of these documents are available to any stockholder upon request by calling the investor relations department at 1-800-532-2757. Any future amendments to or waivers of the Code of Ethics will be posted to our website, as required.

ITEM 1A.    Risk Factors

You should carefully consider the following risk factors as well as the other risks and uncertainties contained in this Annual Report on Form 10-K or in our other SEC filings. The occurrence of one or more of these risks or uncertainties could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition, operating results and cash flows. In this Annual Report on Form 10-K, unless the context expressly requires a different reading, when we state that a factor could "adversely affect us," have a "material adverse effect on our business," "adversely affect our business" and similar expressions, we mean that the factor could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition, operating results and cash flows. Information contained in this section may be considered "forward-looking statements." See "Item 7—Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements" for a discussion of certain qualifications regarding forward-looking statements.

        An Increasing Percentage Of Our Assets Under Management Are Distributed Through Our Wholesale Channel, Which Has Higher Redemption Rates Than Our Traditional Advisors Channel.    In recent years, we have focused on expanding distribution efforts relating to our Wholesale channel. The percentage of our assets under management in the Wholesale channel has increased from 10% at December 31, 2003 to 53%49% at December 31, 2013,2014, and the percentage of our total sales represented by the Wholesale channel has increased from 17% for the year ended December 31, 2003 to 73%67% for the year ended December 31, 2013.2014. The success of sales in our Wholesale channel depends upon our maintaining strong relationships with institutional accounts, certain strategic partners and our third party distributors. Many of those distribution sources also offer investors competing funds that are internally or externally managed, which could limit the distribution of our products. The loss of any of these distribution channels and the inability to continue to access new distribution channels could decrease our assets under management and adversely affect our results of operations and growth. There are no assurances that these channels and their client bases will continue to be accessible to us. The loss or diminution of the level of business we do with those providers could have a material adverse effect on our business, especially with the high concentration of assets in certain funds in this channel, namely the Ivy Asset Strategy fund. Compared to the industry average redemption rate of 25.7%24.7% and 24.5%25.7% for the years ended December 31, 20132014 and 2012,2013, respectively, the Wholesale channel had redemption rates of 25.2%34.8% and 30.2%25.2% for the years ended December 31, 20132014 and 2012,2013, respectively. Redemption rates were 8.9%8.3% and 9.9%8.9% for our Advisors channel in the same periods, reflecting the higher rate of transferability of investment assets in the Wholesale channel.

        Our Business Is Subject To Substantial Risk From Litigation, Regulatory Investigations And Potential Securities Laws Liability.    Many aspects of our business involve substantial risks of litigation, regulatory investigations and/or arbitration, and from time to time, we are involved in various legal proceedings in the course of operating our business. The Company isWe are exposed to liability under federal and state securities laws, other federal and state laws and court decisions, as well as rules and regulations promulgated by the SEC, FINRA and other regulatory bodies. We, our subsidiaries, and/or certain of our past and present officers, have been named as parties in legal actions, regulatory investigations and proceedings, and securities arbitrations in the past and have been subject to claims alleging violation of such laws, rules and regulations, which have resulted in the payment of fines and settlements. An adverse resolution of any lawsuit, legal or regulatory proceeding or claim against us could result in substantial costs or reputational harm to the Company,us, and have a material adverse effect on the Company's business, financial condition or results of operations, which, in turn, may negatively affect the market price of our common stock and our ability to pay dividends.business. In addition to these financial costs and risks, the defense of litigation, regulatory investigations or arbitration may divert resources and management's attention from operations.

        Our Financial Advisors Are Classified As Independent Contractors, And Changes To Their Classification May Increase Our Operating Expenses.    From time to time, various legislative or regulatory proposals are introduced at the federal or state levels to change the status of independent contractors' classification to employees for either employment tax purposes (withholding, social security, Medicare and unemployment taxes) or other benefits available to employees. Currently, most individuals are classified as employees or


Table of Contents

independent contractors for employment tax purposes based on 20 "common law" factors, rather than any definition found in the Internal Revenue Code or Treasury regulations. We classify the majority of our


Table of Contents

financial advisors as independent contractors for all purposes, including employment tax and employee benefit purposes. There can be no assurance that legislative, judicial or regulatory (including tax) authorities will not introduce proposals or assert interpretations of existing rules and regulations that would change the independent contractor/employee classification of those financial advisors currently doing business with us. The costs associated with potential changes, if any, with respect to these independent contractor classifications could have a material adverse effect on the Company, including our results of operations and financial condition.business.

        Support provided to new products may reduce fee income, increase expenses and expose us to potential loss on invested capital.There May Be Adverse Effects On Our Business If Our Funds' Performance Declines.    We may supportSuccess in the developmentinvestment management and mutual fund businesses is dependent on the investment performance of new investment products by waiving a portionclient accounts relative to market conditions and the performance of competing funds. Good relative performance stimulates sales of the Funds' shares and tends to keep redemptions low. Sales of the Funds' shares in turn generate higher management fees we receiveand distribution revenues. Good relative performance also attracts institutional and separate accounts. Conversely, poor relative performance results in decreased sales, increased redemptions of the Funds' shares and the loss of institutional and separate accounts, resulting in decreases in revenues. As of December 31, 2014, 22% and 7% of our assets under management were concentrated in the Ivy Asset Strategy fund and Ivy High Income fund, respectively. As a result, our operating results are significantly affected by the performance of those funds and our ability to minimize redemptions from and maintain assets under management in those funds. If a significant amount of investments are withdrawn from those funds for managing suchany reason, our revenues would decline and our operating results would be adversely affected. Further, given the size and prominence of those funds within our product line, any adverse performance of those funds may also indirectly affect the net sales and redemptions in our other products, by subsidizing expenses or by making seed capital investments. Seed investmentswhich in new products utilize Company capital that would otherwise be available for general corporate purposes and expose us to capital losses. Failure to have or devote sufficient capital to support new products could have an adverse impact onturn may adversely affect our future growth.business.

        There May Be An Adverse Effect On Our Revenues And EarningsBusiness If Our Investors Redeem The Assets We Manage On Short Notice.    Mutual fund investors may redeem their investments in our mutual funds at any time without any prior notice. Additionally, our investment management agreements with institutions and other non-mutual fund accounts are generally terminable upon relatively short notice. Investors can terminate their relationship with us, reduce their aggregate amount of assets under management, or shift their funds to other types of accounts with different rate structures for any number of reasons, including investment performance, changes in prevailing interest rates and financial market performance. The ability of our investors to accomplish thisredeem their investments in our mutual funds on short notice has increased materially due to the growth of assets in our Wholesale channel and with the high concentration of assets in certain funds in this channel, including the Ivy Asset Strategy fund. The decrease in revenues that could result from any such event could have a material adverse effect on our business and earnings.

        There Is No Assurance That New Information Systems Will Be Implemented Successfully.    A number of the Company's key information technology systems were developed solely to handle the Company's particular information technology infrastructure. The Company is in the process of implementing new information technology and systems that it believes could facilitate and improve our core businesses and our productivity. There can be no assurance that the Company will be successful in implementing the new information technology and systems or that their implementation will be completed in a timely or cost effective manner. Failure to implement or maintain adequate information technology infrastructure could impede our ability to support business growth.business.

        Regulatory Risk Is Substantial In Our Business And Non-Compliance With Regulations, Or Changes In Regulations, Could Have A Significant Impact On The Conduct Of Our Business, Reputation And Our Prospects, Revenues And Earnings.Prospects.    Our investment advisory and broker/dealer businesses are heavily regulated, primarily at the federal level. Non-compliance with applicable laws or regulations could result in sanctions being levied against us, including fines and censures, suspension or expulsion from a certain jurisdiction or market, or the revocation of licenses. Non-compliance with applicable laws or regulations could also adversely affect our business, reputation prospects, revenues and earnings.prospects. In addition, changes in current legal, regulatory, accounting, tax or compliance requirements or in governmental policies could adversely affect our operations, revenues and earnings by, among other things, increasing expenses and reducing investor interest in certain products we offer. Distribution fees paid to mutual fund distributors in accordance with Rule 12b-1 promulgated under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended ("Rule 12b-1"), are an important element of the distribution of the mutual funds we manage. The SEC has proposed replacing Rule 12b-1 with a new regulation that would significantly change current fund distribution practices in the industry. If this proposed regulation is adopted, it may have a material impact on the compensation we pay to distributors for distributing the mutual funds we manage and/or our ability to recover expenses related to the distribution of our funds, and thus could materially impact our revenue and net income.


Table of Contents

distribution of our funds, and thus could materially affect our business. Additionally, our profitability could be affected by rules and regulations that impact the business and financial communities generally, including changes to the laws governing state and federal taxation.

        Our Revenues, EarningsBusiness And Prospects Could Be Adversely Affected If The Securities Markets Decline.    Our results of operations are affected by certain economic factors, including the levelsuccess of the securities markets. The on-going existence of adverse market conditions, which is particularly material to usthe U.S. domestic stock market due to our high concentration of assets under management in the United States domestic stockthat market, and lack of investor confidence could result in investors further withdrawing from the markets or decreasing their rate of investment, either of which could adversely affect our revenues, earnings and growth prospects to a greater extent. Because our revenues are, to a large extent, investment management fees that are based on the value of assets under management, a decline in the value of these assets adversely affects our revenues and earnings. Our growth is dependent to a significant degree upon our ability to attract and retain mutual fund assets, and, in an adverse economic environment, this may prove more difficult. Our growth rate has varied from year to year and there can be no assurance that theour average growth rates sustained in recent years will continue. Declines in the securities markets could significantly reduce our future revenues and earnings. In addition, a decline in the market value of these assets could cause our clients to withdraw funds in favor of investments they perceive as offering greater opportunity or lower risk, which could also negatively impact our revenues and earnings. The combination of adverse marketsmarket conditions reducing sales and investment management fees could compound on each other and materially affect earnings.

        There May Be Adverse Effects On Our Revenues And Earnings If Our Funds' Performance Declines.    Success in the investment management and mutual fund businesses is dependent on the investment performance of client accounts relative to market conditions and the performance of competing funds. Good relative performance stimulates sales of the Funds' shares and tends to keep redemptions low. Sales of the Funds' shares in turn generate higher management fees and distribution revenues. Good relative performance also attracts institutional and separate accounts. Conversely, poor relative performance results in decreased sales, increased redemptions of the Funds' shares and the loss of institutional and separate accounts, resulting in decreases in revenues. Failure of our Funds to perform well could, therefore, have a material adverse effect on our revenues and earnings.business.

        Our Ability To Hire And Retain Senior Executive Management And Other Key Personnel Is Significant To Our Success And Growth.    Our continued success depends to a substantial degree on our ability to attract and retain qualified senior executive management and other key personnel to conduct our broker/dealer, fund management and investment advisory businesses. The market for qualified fund managers, investment analysts, financial advisors and wholesalers is extremely competitive. Additionally, we are dependent on our financial advisors and select wholesale distributors to sell our mutual funds and other investment products. Our growth prospects will be directly affected by the quality, quantity and productivity of financial advisors and wholesalers we are able to successfully recruit and retain. There can be no assurances that we will be successful in our efforts to recruit and retain the required personnel.

        We Have Substantial Intangibles On Our Balance Sheet, And Any Impairment Of Our Intangibles Could Adversely Affect Our Results of Operations And Financial Position.    At December 31, 2013, our total assets were approximately $1.3 billion, of which approximately $162.0 million, or 12%, consisted of goodwill and identifiable intangible assets. We complete an ongoing review of goodwill and intangible assets for impairment on an annual basis or more frequently whenever events or a change in circumstances warrant. Important factors in determining whether an impairment of goodwill or intangible assets might exist include significant continued underperformance compared to peers, the likelihood of termination or non-renewal of a mutual fund advisory or subadvisory contract or substantial changes in revenues earned from such contracts, significant changes in our business and products, material and ongoing negative industry or economic trends, or other factors specific to each asset or subsidiary being tested. Because of the significance of goodwill and other intangibles to our consolidated balance sheets, the annual impairment analysis is critical. Any changes in key assumptions about our business and our prospects, or


Table of Contents

changes in market conditions or other externalities, could result in an impairment charge. Any such charge could have a material effect on our results of operations and financial position.

        There May Be Adverse Effects On Our Business And Earnings Upon The Termination Of, Or Failure To Renew, Certain Agreements.    A majority of our revenues are derived from investment management agreements with the Funds that, as required by law, are terminable on 60 days' notice. Each investment management agreement must be approved and renewed annually by the disinterested members of each Fund's board of trustees or its shareholders, as required by law. Additionally, our investment management agreements provide for automatic termination in the event of assignment, which includes a change of control, without the consent of our clients and, in the case of the Funds, approval of the Funds' board of directors/trustees and shareholders to continue the agreements. There can be no assurances that our clients will consent to any assignment of our investment management agreements, or that those and other contracts will not be terminated or will be renewed on favorable terms, if at all, at their expiration and new agreements may not be available. See "Business—Distribution Channels—Wholesale Channel, Institutional Channel." The decrease in revenues that could result from any such event could have a material adverse effect on our business and earnings.

A Failure In Or Breach Of Our Operational Or Security Systems Or Our Technology Infrastructure, Or Those Of Third Parties, Could Result In A Material Adverse Effect On Our Business Reputation, Cash Flows and Results Of Operations.And Reputation.    We are highly dependent upon the use of various proprietary and third-partythird party software applications and other technology systems to operate our business. As part of our normal operations, we process a large number of transactions on a daily basis and maintain and transmit confidential client and employee information, the safety and security of which is dependent upon the effectiveness of our information security policies, procedures and capabilities to protect such systems and the data that reside on or are transmitted through them.

        Although we take protective measures and endeavor to modify these protective measures as circumstances warrant, technology is subject to rapid change and the nature of the threats continue to evolve. As a result, our operating and technology systems, software and networks may fail to operate properly or become disabled, or may be vulnerable to unauthorized access, inadvertent disclosure, loss or destruction of data (including confidential client information), computer viruses or other malicious code, cyber attacks and other events that could materially damage our operations, have an adverse security impact, or cause the disclosure or modification of sensitive or confidential information. Most of the software applications that we use in our business are licensed from, and supported, upgraded and maintained by, third-partythird party vendors. A suspension or termination of certain of these licenses or the related support, upgrades and maintenance could cause temporary system delays or interruption. We also take precautions to password protect and/or encrypt our laptops and other mobile electronic hardware. If such hardware is stolen, misplaced or left unattended, it may become vulnerable to hacking or other


Table of Contents

unauthorized use, creating a possible security risk and resulting in potentially costly actions by us. Further, while we have in place a disaster recovery plan to address catastrophic and unpredictable events, there is no guarantee that this plan will be sufficient in responding to or ameliorating the effects of all disaster scenarios, and we may experience system delays and interruptions as a result of natural disasters, power failures, acts of war, and third-partythird party failures.

        The breach of our operational or security systems or our technology systems, software and networks,infrastructure, or those of third parties, due to one or more of these events could cause interruptions, malfunctions or failures in our operations and/or the loss or inadvertent disclosure of confidential client information could result in substantial financial loss or costs, liability for stolen assets or information, breach of client contracts, client dissatisfaction and/or loss, regulatory actions, remediation costs to repair damage caused by the breach, additional security costs to mitigate against future incidents and litigation costs resulting from the incident. These events, and those discussed above, could have a material adverse effect on our business reputation, resultsand reputation.

        There Is No Assurance That New Information Technology Systems Will Be Implemented Successfully.    A number of operations, financial position, cash flow,our key information technology systems were developed solely to handle our particular information technology infrastructure. We are in the process of implementing new information technology systems that we believe could facilitate and improve our core businesses and our productivity. There can be no assurance that we will be successful in implementing the new information technology systems or that their implementation will be completed in a timely or cost effective manner. Failure to implement or maintain adequate information technology infrastructure could impede our ability to support business growth.

        Support Provided To New Products May Reduce Fee Revenue, Increase Expenses And Expose Us To Potential Loss On Invested Capital.    We may support the development of new investment products by waiving a portion of the fees we usually receive for managing such products, by subsidizing expenses or by making seed capital investments. Seed investments in new products utilize Company capital that would otherwise be available for general corporate purposes and expose us to capital losses. There can be no assurance that new investment products we develop will be successful, which could have a material adverse effect on our business. Failure to have or devote sufficient capital to support new products could have an adverse impact on our future growth.

        Expansion Into International Markets May Increase Operational And Regulatory Risks.    As we broaden our distribution globally, we face increased operational and regulatory risks. The failure of our systems of internal control to properly mitigate such additional risks, or of our operating infrastructure to support such international expansion could result in operational failures and regulatory fines or sanctions. Local regulatory environments may vary widely and place additional demands on our sales, legal and compliance personnel. Identifying and hiring well qualified personnel and adopting policies, procedures and controls to address local or regional requirements require time and resources. Regulators in non-U.S. jurisdictions could also change their policies or laws in a manner that might restrict or otherwise impede our ability to offer our investment strategies in their respective markets. Any of these local requirements, activities or needs could increase the costs and expenses we incur in a specific jurisdiction without any corresponding increase in revenues and income.income from operating in the jurisdiction.

        We Have Substantial Intangibles On Our Balance Sheet, And Any Impairment Of Our Intangibles Could Adversely Affect Our Results of Operations.    At December 31, 2014, our total assets were approximately $1.5 billion, of which approximately $158.1 million, or 10%, consisted of goodwill and identifiable intangible assets. We complete an ongoing review of goodwill and intangible assets for impairment on an annual basis or more frequently whenever events or a change in circumstances warrant. Important factors in determining whether an impairment of goodwill or intangible assets might exist include significant continued underperformance compared to peers, the likelihood of termination or non-renewal of a mutual fund advisory or subadvisory contract or substantial changes in revenues earned from such contracts,


Table of Contents

significant changes in our business and products, material and ongoing negative industry or economic trends, or other factors specific to each asset or subsidiary being tested. Because of the significance of goodwill and other intangibles to our consolidated balance sheets, the impairment analysis is critical. Any changes in key assumptions about our business and our prospects, or changes in market conditions or other externalities, could result in an impairment charge. Any such charge could have a material effect on our results of operations.

        There May Be Adverse Effects On Our Business Upon The Termination Of, Or Failure To Renew, Certain Agreements.    A majority of our revenues are derived from investment management agreements with the Funds that, as required by law, are terminable on 60 days' notice. Each investment management agreement must be approved and renewed annually by the disinterested members of each Fund's board of trustees or its shareholders, as required by law. Additionally, our investment management agreements provide for automatic termination in the event of assignment, which includes a change of control, without the consent of our clients and, in the case of the Funds, approval of the Funds' board of directors/trustees and shareholders to continue the agreements. There can be no assurances that our clients will consent to any assignment of our investment management agreements, or that those and other contracts will not be terminated or will be renewed on favorable terms, if at all, at their expiration and new agreements may not be available. See "Business—Distribution Channels—Wholesale Channel, Institutional Channel." The decrease in revenues that could result from any such event could have a material adverse effect on our business.

        Regulations Restricting The Use Of "Soft Dollars" Could Result In An Increase In Our Expenses.    On behalf of our mutual fund and investment advisory clients, we make decisions to buy and sell securities for each portfolio, select broker/dealers to execute trades, and negotiate brokerage commission rates. In connection with these transactions, we may receive "soft dollar credits" from broker/dealers that we can use to defray certain of our expenses. If regulations are adopted eliminating the ability of asset managers to use "soft dollars," our operating expenses could increase.

        Fee Pressures Could Reduce Our Revenues And Profitability.    There is a trend toward lower fees in some segments of the investment management business. In addition, the SEC has adopted rules that are designed to improve mutual fund corporate governance, which could result in further downward pressure on investment advisory fees in the mutual fund industry. Accordingly, there can be no assurance that we will be able to maintain our current fee structure. Fee reductions on existing or future new business could adversely affect us.

        Challenges To Our Tax Positions May Adversely Affect Our Effective Tax Rate and Business.    The application of complex tax laws and regulations involves numerous uncertainties. Tax authorities may disagree with certain tax positions that we have an adversetaken and assess additional taxes, which could result in adjustments to, or impact onthe timing or amount of, taxable income, deductions or other tax allocations, which may adversely affect our revenueseffective tax rate and profitability.business.

        We Could Experience Adverse Effects On Our Revenues, Profits And Market Share Due To Strong Competition From Numerous And Sometimes Larger Companies.    We compete with stock brokerage firms, mutual fund companies, investment banking firms, insurance companies, banks, internet investment sites, and other financial institutions and individual registered investment advisers. Many of these companies not only offer mutual fund investments and services, but also offer an ever-increasing number of other financial products and services. Many of our competitors have more products and product lines, services and brand recognition and may also have substantially greater assets under management. Many larger mutual fund complexes have developed more extensive relationships with brokerage houses with large distribution networks, which may enable those fund complexes to reach broader client bases. In recent years, there has been a trend of consolidation in the mutual fund industry resulting in stronger competitors with greater financial resources than us. There has also been a trend toward online internet financial services. If existing or potential customers decide to invest with our competitors instead of with us, our market share revenues and income could decline.decline, which could have a material adverse effect on our business.


Table of Contents

        The Terms Of Our Credit Facility And Senior Unsecured Notes Impose Restrictions On Our Operations That May Adversely Impact Our Prospects And The Operations Of Our Business.    There are no assurances that we will be able to raise additional capital if needed, which could negatively impact our liquidity, prospects and operations. We have entered into a 5-year revolving credit facility with various lenders providing for total loansavailability of $125.0 million. Under this facility, the lenders may, at their option upon our request, expand the facility to $200.0 million. At February 14, 2014,13, 2015, there was no balance outstanding under the revolving credit facility. We also entered into a note purchase agreement with various purchasers for the sale and issuance of $190.0 million of unsecured senior notes comprised of $95 million of 5.0% senior notes, series A, due 2018 and $95 million of 5.75% senior notes, series B, due 2021, all of which were issued on January 13, 2011. The terms and conditions of our revolving credit facility and note purchase agreement impose restrictions that affect, among other things, our ability to incur additional debt, make capital expenditures and acquisitions, merge, sell assets, pay dividends and create or incur liens. Our ability to comply with the financial covenants set forth in our credit facility and note purchase agreement could be affected by events beyond our control, and there can be no assurance that we will achieve operating results that will comply with such terms and conditions, a breach of which could result in a default under our credit facility and note purchase agreement. In the event of a default under the credit facility and/or note purchase agreement, the banks could elect to declare the outstanding principal amount of our credit facility, all interest thereon, and all other amounts payable under our credit facility to be immediately due and payable, and the Company's obligations under the senior unsecured notes could be accelerated and become due and payable, including any make-whole amount, respectively.

        Our ability to meet our cash needs and satisfy our debt obligations will depend upon our future operating performance, asset values, the perception of our creditworthiness and, indirectly, the market value of our stock. These factors will be affected by prevailing economic, financial and business conditions and other circumstances, some of which are beyond our control. We anticipate that any funds generated by


Table of Contents

the issuance of our senior unsecured notes and any borrowings from our existing credit facility and/or cash provided by operating activities will provide sufficient funds to finance our business plans, meet our operating expenses and service our debt obligations as they become due. However, in the event that we require additional capital, there can be no assurance that we will be able to raise such capital when needed or on satisfactory terms, if at all, and there can be no assurance that we will be able to renew or refinance our credit facility or senior unsecured notes upon their maturity or on favorable terms. If we are unable to raise capital or obtain financing, we may be forced to incur unanticipated costs or revise our business plan.

        Our Own Operational Failures Or Those Of Third Parties We Rely On, Including Failures Arising Out Of Human Error, Could Disrupt Our Business And Damage Our Reputation.    Our business is highly dependent on our ability to process, on a daily basis, large numbers of transactions. These transactions generally must comply with client investment guidelines, as well as stringent legal and regulatory standards. Despite our employees being highly trained and skilled, due to the large number of transactions we process errors may occur. If we make mistakes in performing our services that cause financial harm to our clients, our clients may seek to recover their losses. The occurrence of mistakes, particularly significant ones, could have a material adverse effect on our reputation and business.

Potential Misuse Of Funds And Information In The Possession Of Our Employees And/Or Advisors Could Result In Liability To Our Clients, Subject Us To Regulatory Sanctions Or Otherwise Adversely Affect Our Revenues and Profitability.Business.    Our business is based on the trust and confidence of our clients, for whom our financial advisors handle a significant amount of funds, as well as financial and personal information. Although we have implemented a system of internal controls to minimize the risk of fraudulent taking or misuse of funds and confidential information, there can be no assurance that our controls will be adequate or that a taking or misuse of funds and confidential information by our employees or financial advisors can be prevented. We could be liable in the event of a taking or misuse of funds and confidential information by our employees or financial advisors and we could also be subject to regulatory sanctions. Although we believe that we have adequately insured against these risks, there can be no assurance that our insurance will be maintained or


Table of Contents

that it will be adequate to meet any liability.liability resulting from these activities. Any damage to the trust and confidence placed in us by our clients may cause our assets under management to decline, which could adversely affect our revenues, financial condition, resultsbusiness and prospects.

        There Are No Assurances That We Will Pay Future Dividends, Which Could Adversely Affect Our Stock Price.    The Waddell & Reed Financial, Inc. Board of operationsDirectors (the "Board of Directors") currently intends to continue to declare quarterly dividends on our Class A common stock. However, the declaration and payment of dividends is subject to the discretion of our Board of Directors. Any determination as to the payment of dividends, as well as the level of such dividends, will depend on, among other things, general economic and business prospects.conditions, our strategic plans, our financial results and condition, and contractual, legal, and regulatory restrictions on the payment of dividends by us or our subsidiaries. We are a holding company and, as such, our ability to pay dividends is subject to the ability of our subsidiaries to provide us with cash. There can be no assurance that the current quarterly dividend level will be maintained or that we will pay any dividends in any future period. Any change in the level of our dividends or the suspension of the payment of dividends could adversely affect our stock price.

        Our Stockholders Rights Plan Could Deter Takeover Attempts, Which Some Of Our Stockholders May Believe To Be In Their Best Interest.    Under certain conditions, the rights under our stockholders rights plan entitle the holders of such rights to receive shares of our common stock having a value equal to two times the exercise price of the right. The rights are attached to each share of our outstanding common stock and generally are exercisable only if a person or group acquires 15% or more of the voting power represented by our common stock. Our stockholders rights plan could impede the completion of a merger, tender offer, or other takeover attempt even though some or a majority of our stockholders might believe that a merger, tender offer or takeover is in their best interests, and even if such a transaction could result in our stockholders receiving a premium for their shares of our stock over the then current market price of our stock.

        Provisions Of Our Organizational Documents Could Deter Takeover Attempts, Which Some Of Our Stockholders May Believe To Be In Their Best Interest.    Under our Restated Certificate of Incorporation, our Board of Directors has the authority, without action by our stockholders, to fix certain terms and issue shares of our Preferred Stock, par value $1.00 per share. Actions of our Board of Directors pursuant to this authority may have the effect of delaying, deterring or preventing a change in control of the Company. Other provisions in our Restated Certificate of Incorporation and in our Amended and Restated Bylaws impose procedural and other requirements that could be deemed to have anti-takeover effects, including replacing incumbent directors. Our Board of Directors is divided into three classes, each of which is to serve for a staggered three-year term after the initial classification and election, and incumbent directors may not be removed without cause, all of which may make it more difficult for a third party to gain control of our Board of Directors. In addition, as a Delaware corporation we are subject to section 203 of the Delaware General Corporation Law. With certain exceptions, section 203 imposes restrictions on mergers and other business combinations between us and any holder of 15% or more of our voting stock.

        Our Holding Company Structure Results In Structural Subordination And May Affect Our Ability To Fund Our Operations And Make Payments On Our Debt.    We are a holding company and, accordingly, substantially all of our operations are conducted through our subsidiaries. As a result, our cash flow and our ability to service our debt, including $190.0 million of our senior notes, are dependent upon the earnings of our subsidiaries and the distribution of earnings, loans or other payments by our subsidiaries to us. Our subsidiaries are separate and distinct legal entities and have no obligation to pay any amounts due on our debt or provide us with funds for our payment obligations, whether by dividends, distributions, loans or


Table of Contents

other payments. In addition, any payment of dividends, distributions, loans or advances to us by our subsidiaries could be subject to statutory or contractual restrictions. Payments to us by our subsidiaries will also be contingent upon our subsidiaries' earnings and business considerations. Our right to receive any assets of any of our subsidiaries upon their liquidation or reorganization, and therefore the right of the


Table of Contents

holders of our debt to participate in those assets, would be effectively subordinated to the claims of those subsidiaries' creditors, including trade creditors. In addition, even if we were a creditor of any of our subsidiaries, our rights as a creditor would be effectively subordinate to any security interest in the assets of our subsidiaries and any indebtedness of our subsidiaries senior to that held by us.

        There Are No Assurances That We Will Pay Future Dividends, Which Could Adversely Affect Our Stock Price.    The Waddell & Reed Financial, Inc. Board of Directors (the "Board of Directors") currently intends to continue to declare quarterly dividends on our Class A common stock (our "common stock"); however, the declaration and payment of dividends is subject to the discretion of our Board of Directors. Any determination as to the payment of dividends, as well as the level of such dividends, will depend on, among other things, general economic and business conditions, our strategic plans, our financial results and condition, and contractual, legal, and regulatory restrictions on the payment of dividends by us or our subsidiaries. We are a holding company and, as such, our ability to pay dividends is subject to the ability of our subsidiaries to provide us with cash. There can be no assurance that the current quarterly dividend level will be maintained or that we will pay any dividends in any future period(s). Any change in the level of our dividends or the suspension of the payment thereof could adversely affect our stock price.

ITEM 1B.    Unresolved Staff Comments

        None.

ITEM 2.    Properties

        We own twofour buildings in the vicinity of buildings currently leased by our home offices: two 50,000 square foot buildings and a 50,00052,000 square foot building located in Overland Park, Kansas and a 45,000 square foot building located in Mission, Kansas. Existing home office lease agreements cover approximately 332,000298,000 square feet for Waddell & Reed located in Overland Park, Kansas and 38,000 square feet for our disaster recovery facility. In addition, we lease office space for sales management which is available to our financial advisors for use, in various locations throughout the United States totaling approximately 656,000667,000 square feet. A majority of this office space is available to our financial advisors to use. In the opinion of management, the office space owned and leased by the Company is adequate for existing operating needs.

ITEM 3.    Legal Proceedings

        The Company is involved from time to time in various legal proceedings, regulatory investigations and claims incident to the normal conduct of business, which may include proceedings that are specific to us and others generally applicable to business practices within the industries in which we operate. A substantial legal liability or a significant regulatory action against us could have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition and on the results of operations in a particular quarter or year.

        The Company accrues an undiscounted liability for those contingencies where the incurrence of a loss is probable and the amount can be reasonably estimated. These amounts are not reduced by amounts that may be recovered under insurance or claims against third parties, but undiscounted receivables from insurers or other third parties may be accrued separately. The Company regularly revises such accruals in light of new information. For contingencies where an unfavorable outcome is reasonably possible and that are significant, the Company discloses the nature of the contingency and, where feasible, an estimate of the possible loss. For purposes of our litigation contingency disclosures, "significant" includes material matters as well as other items that management believes should be disclosed. ManagementManagement's judgment is required related to contingent liabilities andbecause the outcome of litigation because bothoutcomes are difficult to predict. In our opinion, the likelihood that any pending legal proceeding, regulatory investigation, claim, or other contingency will have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations is remote.

ITEM 4.    Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders

        During the fourth quarter of the fiscal year covered by this report, no matter was submitted to a vote of the Company's security holders, through the solicitation of proxies or otherwise.


Table of Contents


PART II

ITEM 5.    Market for Registrant's Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

        Our Class A common stock ("common stock") is traded on the NYSE under the ticker symbol "WDR." The following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, the high and low sale prices of our common stock, as reported by the NYSE, as well as the cash dividends declared for these time periods:


Market Price

 
 2013 2012 
Quarter
 High
 Low
 Dividends
Per
Share

 High
 Low
 Dividends
Per
Share

 
            
 1 $43.87 $35.67 $0.28 $33.58 $24.40 $0.25 
 2  48.08  38.70  0.28  33.53  26.55  0.25 
 3  55.03  43.09  0.28  34.04  27.02  0.25 
 4  66.09  50.76  0.34  35.77  30.91  1.28 
 
 2014 2013 
Quarter
 High
 Low
 Dividends
Per
Share

 High
 Low
 Dividends
Per
Share

 
            
 1 $74.33 $61.49 $0.34 $43.87 $35.67 $0.28 
 2  76.46  59.00  0.34  48.08  38.70  0.28 
 3  65.57  51.25  0.34  55.03  43.09  0.28 
 4  51.84  42.39  0.43  66.09  50.76  0.34 

        The cash dividends declared during the fourth quarter of 2012 includes a special cash dividend on our common stock of $1.00 per share that was paid on December 6, 2012.

        Year-end closing prices of our common stock were $49.82 and $65.12 for 2014 and $34.82 for 2013, and 2012, respectively. The closing price of our common stock on February 14, 201413, 2015 was $68.89.$49.94.

        According to the records of our transfer agent, we had 2,8992,433 holders of record of common stock as of February 14, 2014.13, 2015. We believe that a substantially larger number of beneficial stockholders hold such shares in depository or nominee form.

Dividends

        The declaration of dividends is subject to the discretion of the Board of Directors. We intend, from time to time, to pay cash dividends on our common stock as our Board of Directors deems appropriate, after consideration of our operating results, financial condition, cash and capital requirements, compliance with covenants in our revolving credit facility, note purchase agreement and such other factors as the Board of Directors deems relevant. To the extent assets are used to meet minimum net capital requirements under the Net Capital Rule, they are not available for distribution to stockholders as dividends. See Part I, Item 1. "Business—Regulation." We anticipate that quarterly dividends will continue to be paid.

Common Stock Repurchases

        Our Board of Directors has authorized the repurchase of our common stock in the open market and/or private purchases. The acquired shares may be used for corporate purposes, including shares issued to employees in our stock-based compensation programs. During the year ended December 31, 2013,2014, we repurchased 1,492,5352,252,152 shares in the open market and privately at an aggregate cost, including commissions, of $72.1$131.0 million, including 665,035599,340 shares from related parties to cover their tax withholdings from the vesting of shares granted under our stock-based compensation programs. The aggregate cost of shares obtained from related parties during 20132014 was $34.5$40.9 million. The purchase price paid by us for private repurchases of our common stock from related parties is the closing market price on the purchase date.


Table of Contents

        The following table sets forth certain information about the shares of common stock we repurchased during the fourth quarter of 2013.2014.

Period
 Total Number of
Shares Purchased
(1)
 Average
Price Paid
per Share
 Total Number of
Shares
Purchased as
Part of Publicly
Announced
Program
 Maximum Number (or
Approximate Dollar
Value) of Shares That
May Yet Be
Purchased Under The
Program
  Total Number of
Shares Purchased
(1)
 Average
Price Paid
per Share
 Total Number of
Shares
Purchased as
Part of Publicly
Announced
Program
 Maximum Number (or
Approximate Dollar
Value) of Shares That
May Yet Be
Purchased Under The
Program
 

October 1 - October 31

 50,000 $62.65 50,000 n/a (1) 450,000 $47.89 450,000 n/a (1)

November 1 - November 30

 51,569 62.85 51,569 n/a (1) 699 48.86  n/a (1)

December 1 - December 31

 203,127 65.04 203,127 n/a (1) 279,183 47.64 108,623 n/a (1)
         

Total

 304,696 $64.28 304,696    729,882 $47.80 558,623   
         
         

(1)
On August 31, 1998, we announced that our Board of Directors approved a program to repurchase shares of our common stock on the open market. Under the repurchase program, we are authorized to repurchase, in any seven-day period, the greater of (i) 3% of our outstanding common stock or (ii) $50 million of our common stock. We may repurchase our common stock in privately negotiated transactions or through the New York Stock Exchange, other national or regional market systems, electronic communication networks or alternative trading systems. Our stock repurchase program does not have an expiration date or an aggregate maximum number or dollar value of shares that may be repurchased. Our Board of Directors reviewed and ratified the stock repurchase program in October 2012. During the fourth quarter of 2013, all2014, 558,623 shares of our common stock repurchases were maderepurchased pursuant to the repurchase program and 196,296171,259 shares, reflected in the table above, were purchased in connection with funding employee income tax withholding obligations arising from the vesting of nonvested shares.

Table of Contents

Total Return Performance

Comparison of Cumulative Total Return (1)



        The above graph compares the cumulative total stockholder return on the Company's Class A common stock from December 31, 20082009 through December 31, 2013,2014, with the cumulative total return of the Standard & Poor's 500 Stock Index and the SNL Asset Manager Index. The SNL Asset Manager Index is a composite of 3541 publicly traded asset management companies (including, among others, the companies in the peer group reviewed by the Compensation Committee for executive compensation purposes) prepared by SNL Financial, Charlottesville, Virginia. The graph assumes the investment of $100 in the Company's Class A common stock and in each of the two indices on December 31, 20082009 with all dividends being reinvested. The closing price of the Company's Class A common stock on December 31, 20082009 (the last trading day of the year) was $15.46$30.54 per share. The stock price performance on the graph is not necessarily indicative of future price performance.


 Period Ending  
 Period Ending  
Index
 12/31/08
 12/31/09
 12/31/10
 12/31/11
 12/31/12
 12/31/13
  
 12/31/09
 12/31/10
 12/31/11
 12/31/12
 12/31/13
 12/31/14
  
  
  

Waddell & Reed Financial, Inc.

 100.00 203.83 241.69 174.40 258.92 496.85   100.00 118.58 85.56 127.03 243.76 190.73  

SNL Asset Manager

 100.00 162.23 186.74 161.52 207.23 318.46   100.00 115.11 99.56 127.74 196.30 207.09  

S&P 500

 100.00 126.46 145.51 148.59 172.37 228.19   100.00 115.06 117.49 136.30 180.44 205.14  


Table of Contents

ITEM 6.    Selected Financial Data

        The following table sets forth our selected consolidated financial and other data as of the dates and for the periods indicated, and reflects continuing operations data. Selected financial data should be read in conjunction with, and is qualified in its entirety by, "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" and our Consolidated Financial Statements and the Notes thereto appearing elsewhere in this report.


 For the Year Ended December 31,  For the Year Ended December 31, 

 2013 2012 2011 2010 2009  2014 2013 2012 2011 2010 

 (in thousands, except per share data, percentages and personnel data)
  (in thousands, except per share data, percentages, sales and
personnel data)

 

Revenues from:

                      

Investment management fees

 $650,442 549,231 530,599 457,538 354,593  $768,102 650,442 549,231 530,599 457,538 

Underwriting and distribution fees

 582,819 496,465 469,484 410,380 331,754  678,678 582,819 496,465 469,484 410,380 

Shareholder service fees

 137,093 128,109 122,449 110,348 97,969  150,979 137,093 128,109 122,449 110,348 
           

Total revenues

 1,370,354 1,173,805 1,122,532 978,266 784,316  1,597,759 1,370,354 1,173,805 1,122,532 978,266 

Income from continuing operations

 
$

252,998
 
192,528
 
172,205
 
153,428
 
104,051
  
$

313,331
 
252,998
 
192,528
 
172,205
 
153,428
 

Operating margin

 
28%
 
26%
 
25%
 
25%
 
21%
  
30%
 
28%
 
26%
 
25%
 
25%
 

Net income per share from continuing operations, basic and diluted

 
$

2.96
 
2.25
 
2.01
 
1.79
 
1.22
  
$

3.71
 
2.96
 
2.25
 
2.01
 
1.79
 

Dividends declared per common share

 
$

1.18
 
2.03
 
0.85
 
0.77
 
0.76
  
$

1.45
 
1.18
 
2.03
 
0.85
 
0.77
 

Wholesale channel data:

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Sales and other net flows

 $21,410,584 15,930,062 16,872,811 14,742,798 14,868,968 

Sales (in millions)

 $18,534 21,411 15,930 16,873 14,743 

Number of external wholesalers

 50 50 51 46 34  59 50 50 51 46 

Advisor channel data:

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Sales and other net flows

 $5,232,138 4,504,568 4,152,779 3,953,244 3,532,120 

Sales (in millions)

 $5,545 5,232 4,505 4,153 3,953 

Advisors' productivity (1)

 214.6 180.3 165.1 124.9 91.3  $254 215 180 165 125 

Average number of financial advisors

 1,749 1,762 1,757 2,019 2,336  1,750 1,749 1,762 1,757 2,019 

Institutional channel sales and other net flows

 
$

3,107,689
 
2,719,579
 
3,526,019
 
3,702,674
 
1,814,978
 

Institutional channel sales (in millions)

 
$

3,392
 
3,108
 
2,720
 
3,526
 
3,703
 

Shares outstanding at December 31

 
85,236
 
85,679
 
85,564
 
85,751
 
85,806
  
83,654
 
85,236
 
85,679
 
85,564
 
85,751
 

 

 
 As of December 31, 
 
 2014 2013 2012 2011 2010 
 
 (in millions, except for percentages)
 

Assets under management

 $123,650  126,543  96,365  83,157  83,673 

Diversification (company total)

  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
 

As % of Sales

                

Asset Strategy

  25%  29%  26%  37%  46% 

Fixed Income

  26%  29%  34%  18%  13% 

Other

  49%  42%  40%  45%  41% 

As % of Assets Under Management

                

Asset Strategy

  29%  34%  34%  35%  37% 

Fixed Income

  18%  18%  21%  17%  13% 

Other

  53%  48%  45%  48%  50% 

Balance sheet data:

  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
 

Goodwill and identifiable intangible assets

 $158.1  162.0  162.0  162.0  162.0 

Total assets

  1,511.9  1,337.0  1,152.8  1,082.4  976.9 

Long-term debt

  190.0  190.0  190.0  190.0  190.0 

Total liabilities

  725.8  649.7  642.6  558.8  519.8 

Stockholders' equity

  786.1  687.3  510.2  523.6  457.1 
 
 As of December 31, 
 
 2013 2012 2011 2010 2009 
 
 (in millions, except for percentages)
 

Assets under management

 $126,543  96,365  83,157  83,673  69,783 

Diversification (company total)

  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
 

As % of Sales

                

Asset Strategy

  29%  26%  37%  46%  51% 

Fixed Income

  29%  34%  18%  13%  12% 

Other

  42%  40%  45%  41%  37% 

As % of Assets Under Management

                

Asset Strategy

  34%  34%  35%  37%  35% 

Fixed Income

  18%  21%  17%  13%  12% 

Other

  48%  45%  48%  50%  53% 

Balance sheet data:

  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
 

Goodwill and identifiable intangible assets

 $162.0  162.0  162.0  162.0  162.0 

Total assets

  1,337.0  1,152.8  1,082.4  976.9  983.4 

Long-term debt

  190.0  190.0  190.0  190.0  200.0 

Total liabilities

  649.7  642.6  558.8  519.8  614.3 

Stockholders' equity

  687.3  510.2  523.6  457.1  369.1 

(1)
Advisors'Advisor productivity is calculated by dividing underwriting and distribution revenues for the Advisors channel by the average number of advisors during the year.

Table of Contents

ITEM 7.    Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

        This ItemAnnual Report on Form 10-K contains "forward-looking statements" within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, which reflect the current views and assumptions of management with respect to future events regarding our business and the industry in general. These forward-looking statements include all statements, other than statements of historical fact, regarding our financial position, business strategy and other plans and objectives for future operations, including statements with respect to revenues and earnings, the amount and composition of assets under management, distribution sources, expense levels, redemption rates and the financial markets and other conditions. These statements are generally identified by the use of words such as "may," "could," "should," "would," "believe," "anticipate," "forecast," "estimate," "expect," "intend," "plan," "project," "outlook," "will," "potential" and similar statements of a future or forward-looking nature. Readers are cautioned that any forward-looking information provided by or on behalf of the Company is not a guarantee of future performance. Certain important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from our expectations are disclosed in the Item 1 "Business" and Item 1A "Risk Factors" sectionsections of this Annual Report on Form 10-K, which include, without limitation, the adverse effect from a decline in securities markets or in the relative investment performance of our products, our inability to pay future dividends, the loss of existing distribution channels or the inability to access new ones, a reduction of the assets we manage on short notice, and adverse results of litigation and/or arbitration. The forgoing factors should not be construed as exhaustive and should be read together with other cautionary statements included in this and other reports and filings we make with the SEC. All forward-looking statements speak only as of the date on which they are made and we undertake no duty to update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.

        The following should be read in conjunction with the "Selected Financial Data" and our Consolidated Financial Statements and Notes thereto appearing elsewhere in this report.

Executive Overview

        We are one of the oldest mutual fund and asset management firms in the country, with expertise in a broad range of investment styles and across a variety of market environments. Our earnings and cash flows are heavily dependent on financial market conditions. Significant increases or decreases in the various securities markets can have a material impact on our results of operations, financial condition and cash flows.

Revenue Sources

        We derive our revenues from providing investment management and advisory services, investment product underwriting and distribution, and shareholder services administration to mutual funds, UCITS sub-funds, and institutional and separately managed accounts. Investment management and/or advisory fees are based on the amount of average assets under management and are affected by sales levels, financial market conditions, redemptions and the composition of assets. Our underwriting and distribution revenues consist of Rule 12b-1 asset-based service and distribution fees, fees earned on fee-based asset allocation products and related advisory services, distribution fees on certain variable products, and commissions derived from sales of investment and insurance products. The products sold have various commission structures and the revenues received from those sales vary based on the type and dollar amount sold. Shareholder service fee revenue includes transfer agency fees, custodian fees from retirement plan accounts, portfolio accounting and administration fees, and is earned based on assets under management or number of client accounts.

Expense Drivers

        Our major expenses are underwriting and distribution-relatedfor commissions, employee compensation, field support, dealer services and information technology expense, amortizationtechnology.


Table of deferred sales commissions and subadvisory fee expense.Contents

Our Distribution Channels

        One of our distinctive qualities is that we aredistribute our investment products through a significant distributor of investment products.balanced distribution network. Our retail products are distributed through our Wholesale channel, which includes third-partiesthird parties such as other broker/dealers, registered investment advisors and various retirement platforms or through our Advisors


Table of Contents

channel sales force of independent financial advisors. We also market our investment advisory services to institutional investors, either directly or through consultants, in our Institutional channel.

        Our Wholesale channel is our fastest growing distribution channel. Channel efforts are led by the solid long-term performance record of the Ivy Funds family. We distribute retail mutual funds through broker/dealers, and registered investment advisors and various retirement platforms through a team of external, internal and hybrid wholesalers as well as a team dedicated to national accounts.

        The Ivy Funds maintain strong positions on many of the leading third-partythird party distribution platforms, and we continue efforts to diversify our sales by offering other solid performing funds besides our flagship Ivy Asset Strategy fund to our partners. During 2013,2014, we had sevennine funds exceed gross sales of $250 million. Sales of products other than our Ivy Asset Strategy fund accounted for 64%66% of total sales during 20132014 compared to 64% during 2013 and 68% during 2012 and 53% for 2011.2012. We expect the Wholesale channel to be critical in driving our organic growth rate in the coming years.

        Our Advisors channel sales force consists of 1,7461,766 independent financial advisors spread throughout the United States, who carry out our mission of providing financial advice for retirement, education funding, estate planning and other financial needs for our clients. A distinguishing aspect of this channel is its industry low redemption rate, which can be attributed to the personal and customized nature in which our advisors provide service to our clients by focusing on meeting their clients,long-term financial objectives, and this in turn leads to a more stable asset base for the channel.

        Over the past several years, weWe have focused our recruiting efforts on bringing in experienced a decline in our number of financial advisors; however, the decline was not unexpectedadvisors, which has allowed us to achieve productivity growth, as we continue to push for higher production from our advisors by increasing minimum production requirements for them to stay licensed with us. Advisors channel underwriting and distribution fee revenues per advisor increased 30%18%, to $215$254 thousand, and sales and other net inflows in the channel increased 26%23%, to $5.2$5.5 billion, during the past two years, despite a negligible decrease in average advisor headcount. We continue to focus our recruiting efforts on bringing in experienced advisors.years.

        Through our Institutional channel we manage assets in a variety of investment styles for a variety of types of institutions.institutions as well as the Selector Management Funds. The largest percentage of our clients hire us to act as subadvisor for their branded products; they are typically domestic or foreign distributors of investment products who lack scale or the track record to manage internally, or choose to market multi-manager styles. Our subadvisory relationships account for more than 70% of the channel's $17.8 billion in assets at the end of 2014. Our diverse client list also includes pension funds, Taft-Hartley plans and endowments. This is the smallest of our three distribution channels but itchannel has experienced positive gross sales and net flow trends over the past two years due to our growing subadvisory relationships. Our subadvisory relationships account for more than 70% of the channel's $15.8 billion in assets at the end of 2013.

Sale of Legend

        During 2012, the Company signed a definitive agreement to sell all the common interests of Legend and the sale closed effective January 1, 2013. Based on the value of the consideration the Company expected to receive upon closing, which was less than the carrying value of net assets to be sold, the Company recorded a non-cash impairment charge of $42.4 million, which is reflected in income (loss) from discontinued operations on the statement of income in 2012. The consideration received was subject to working capital and regulatory capital adjustments through the closing date. The Company retained $7.7 million of Legend's excess working capital as part of the agreement. The agreement also included anAn earnout provision based on asset retention for a periodreceivable of two years following the closing date.$4.1 million was accrued as of December 31, 2014 and we received payment in February 2015.

        The operational results of Legend have been presented as discontinued operations in the consolidated financial statements for all periods presented. Unless otherwise stated, references in Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations refers to continuing operations.


Table of Contents

Operating Results

        The companyCompany ended the year with $1.4$1.6 billion in revenues. The revenue increase of 17% relative to fiscal 20122013 was reflective of an increase in our average managed assets of 19% and a net flow increase of 264% year over year.. Average assets under management were $130.1 billion in 2014 compared to $109.2 billion in 2013 compared to $91.7 billion in 2012.2013. Income from continuing operations increased 31%24% compared to 20122013 while our operating margin improved from 25.8%28.1% to 28.1%30.3%.

        Our balance sheet remains strong, as we ended the year with cash and investments of $689.2$809.9 million. At December 31, 2013,2014, we had no borrowings outstanding under our five year revolving credit facility, which provides for initial borrowings of up to $125.0 million and can be expanded to $200.0 million.

Assets Under Management

        Assets under management of $123.7 billion on December 31, 2014 decreased $2.8 billion, or 2%, compared to $126.5 billion on December 31, 2013 increased $30.12013. Outflows of $5.1 billion or 31%, compared to $96.4 billion reported a year ago. Market appreciation of $21.7 billion across the complex and net flows of $7.4 billion generated byin the Wholesale channel were partially offset by aggregate net flows of $1.6 billion in the primary contributors to this increase.Advisors and Institutional channels.

Change in Assets Under Management (1)

 
 Wholesale
Channel
 Advisors
Channel
 Institutional
Channel
 Total 
 
 (in millions)
 

December 31, 2014

             

Beginning Assets

 $67,055  43,667  15,821  126,543 

Sales (2)

  
18,534
  
5,545
  
3,392
  
27,471
 

Redemptions

  (23,524)  (4,575)  (2,920)  (31,019) 

Net Exchanges

  (101)  (384)  485   

Net Flows

  (5,091)  586  957  (3,548) 

Market Appreciation (Depreciation)

  
(1,629)
  
1,264
  
1,020
  
655
 

Ending Assets

 $60,335  45,517  17,798  123,650 

December 31, 2013

  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
 

Beginning Assets

 $48,930  35,660  11,775  96,365 

Sales (2)

  
21,411
  
5,232
  
3,108
  
29,751
 

Redemptions

  (14,313)  (4,304)  (2,622)  (21,239) 

Net Exchanges

  303  (306)    (3) 

Net Flows

  7,401  622  486  8,509 

Market Appreciation

  
10,724
  
7,385
  
3,560
  
21,669
 

Ending Assets

 $67,055  43,667  15,821  126,543 

December 31, 2012

  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
 

Beginning Assets

 $40,954  31,709  10,494  83,157 

Sales (2)

  
15,930
  
4,505
  
2,720
  
23,155
 

Redemptions

  (13,896)  (4,156)  (2,760)  (20,812) 

Net Exchanges

  155  (158)    (3) 

Net Flows

  2,189  191  (40)  2,340 

Market Appreciation

  
5,787
  
3,760
  
1,321
  
10,868
 

Ending Assets

 $48,930  35,660  11,775  96,365 
 
 Wholesale
Channel
 Advisors
Channel
 Institutional
Channel
 Total 
 
 (in millions)
 

December 31, 2013

             

Beginning Assets

 $48,930  35,660  11,775  96,365 

Sales and Other Net Inflows (2)

  
21,411
  
5,232
  
3,108
  
29,751
 

Redemptions

  (14,313)  (4,304)  (2,622)  (21,239) 

Net Exchanges

  303  (306)  -  (3) 
          

Net Flows

  7,401  622  486  8,509 

Market Appreciation

  
10,724
  
7,385
  
3,560
  
21,669
 
          

Ending Assets

 $67,055  43,667  15,821  126,543 
          
          

December 31, 2012

  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
 

Beginning Assets

 $40,954  31,709  10,494  83,157 

Sales and Other Net Inflows (2)

  
15,930
  
4,505
  
2,720
  
23,155
 

Redemptions

  (13,896)  (4,156)  (2,760)  (20,812) 

Net Exchanges

  155  (158)  -  (3) 
          

Net Flows

  2,189  191  (40)  2,340 

Market Depreciation

  
5,787
  
3,760
  
1,321
  
10,868
 
          

Ending Assets

 $48,930  35,660  11,775  96,365 
          
          

December 31, 2011

  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
 

Beginning Assets

 $40,883  33,181  9,609  83,673 

Sales and Other Net Inflows (2)

  
16,873
  
4,153
  
3,526
  
24,552
 

Redemptions

  (12,995)  (4,047)  (2,480)  (19,522) 

Net Exchanges

  261  (262)  -  (1) 
          

Net Flows

  4,139  (156)  1,046  5,029 

Market Appreciation

  
(4,068)
  
(1,316)
  
(161)
  
(5,545)
 
          

Ending Assets

 $40,954  31,709  10,494  83,157 
          
          

(1)
Includes all activity of the Funds, the Selector Management Funds and institutional and separate accounts, including money market funds and transactions at net asset value, accounts for which we receive no commissions.

(2)
Sales and Other Net Inflows is primarilyPrimarily gross sales (net of sales commission). This amount, but also includes net reinvested dividends and capital gains and investment income.

Table of Contents

        Average assets under management, which are generally more indicative of trends in revenue for providing investment management services than the year over year change in ending assets under management, increased by 19% compared to 2012.2013.

Average Assets Under Management


 2013 2012 2011  2014 2013 2012 

 Average Percentage
of Total
 Average Percentage
of Total
 Average Percentage
of Total
  Average Percentage
of Total
 Average Percentage
of Total
 Average Percentage
of Total
 

 (in millions, except percentage data)
  (in millions, except percentage data)
 

Distribution Channel:

                          

Wholesale Channel

                          

Equity

 $45,047 80% 37,924 83% 39,387 91%  $54,563 80% 45,047 80% 37,924 83% 

Fixed income

 11,359 20% 7,684 17% 3,684 8%  13,203 20% 11,359 20% 7,684 17% 

Money market

 184 - 191 - 320 1%  168  184  191  
             

Total

 $56,590 100% 45,799 100% 43,391 100%  $67,934 100% 56,590 100% 45,799 100% 
             
             

Advisors Channel

                          

Equity

 $28,449 72% 24,227 70% 24,477 73%  $32,999 74% 28,449 72% 24,227 70% 

Fixed income

 9,477 24% 8,933 26% 7,629 23%  9,935 22% 9,477 24% 8,933 26% 

Money market

 1,565 4% 1,318 4% 1,203 4%  1,966 4% 1,565 4% 1,318 4% 
             

Total

 $39,491 100% 34,478 100% 33,309 100%  $44,900 100% 39,491 100% 34,478 100% 
             
             

Institutional Channel

                          

Equity

 $12,433 95% 10630 93% 9,627 93%  $16,483 95% 12,433 95% 10,630 93% 

Fixed income

 668 5% 784 7% 780 7%  824 5% 668 5% 784 7% 

Money market

 - - - - - -        
             

Total

 $13,101 100% 11,414 100% 10,407 100%  $17,307 100% 13,101 100% 11,414 100% 
             
             

Total by Asset Class:

                          

Equity

 $85,929 79% 72,781 79% 73,491 84%  $104,045 80% 85,929 79% 72,781 79% 

Fixed income

 21,504 20% 17,401 19% 12,093 14%  23,962 18% 21,504 20% 17,401 19% 

Money market

 1,749 1% 1,509 2% 1,523 2%  2,134 2% 1,749 1% 1,509 2% 
             

Total

 $109,182 100% 91,691 100% 87,107 100%  $130,141 100% 109,182 100% 91,691 100% 
             
             

Table of Contents

        The following table summarizes our five largest mutual funds as of December 31, 20132014 by ending assets under management and investment management fees for the last three years. The assets under management and management fees of our five largestthese mutual funds are presented as a percentage of our total assets under management and total management fees.

Five Largest Mutual Funds by Ending Assets Under Management and Investment Management Fees


 2013 2012 2011  2014 2013 2012 

 Ending Percentage
of Total
 Ending Percentage
of Total
 Ending Percentage
of Total
  Ending Percentage
of Total
 Ending Percentage
of Total
 Ending Percentage
of Total
 

 (in millions, except percentage data)
  (in millions, except percentage data)
 

By Assets Under Management:

                          

Ivy Asset Strategy

 $34,647 27% 25,981 27% 23,642 28%  $27,431 22% 34,647 27% 25,981 27% 

Ivy High Income

 10,365 8% 7,228 8% 3,197 4%  8,341 7% 10,365 8% 7,228 8% 

Ivy Science & Technology

 4,648 4% 1,566 2% 1,181 1%  5,926 5% 4,648 4% 1,566 2% 

Ivy Mid Cap Growth

 4,533 4% 2,777 3% 1,500 2%  4,966 4% 4,533 4% 2,777 3% 

Advisors Core Investment

 4,169 3% 3,067 3% 2,724 3%  4,507 3% 4,169 3% 3,067 3% 
             

Total

 $58,362 46% 40,619 43% 32,244 38%  $51,171 41% 58,362 46% 40,619 43% 
             
             



 

(in thousands, except percentage data)


 

 

(in thousands, except percentage data)


 

By Management Fees:

                          

Ivy Asset Strategy

 $164,372 25% 142,701 26% 146,649 28%  $189,106 25% 164,372 25% 142,701 26% 

Ivy High Income

 44,095 7% 28,182 5% 12,843 2%  54,252 7% 44,095 7% 28,182 5% 

Ivy Science & Technology

 43,950 5% 22,949 4% 11,886 2% 

Ivy Mid Cap Growth

 30,082 5% 18,607 3% 8,842 2%  38,416 5% 30,082 5% 18,607 3% 

Advisors Science & Technology

 24,500 4% 19,007 3% 19,208 3%  30,296 4% 24,500 4% 19,007 3% 

Ivy Science & Technology

 22,949 4% 11,886 2% 11,414 2% 
             

Total

 $285,998 45% 220,383 39% 198,956 37%  $356,020 46% 285,998 45% 220,383 39% 
             
             

Results of Operations

Income from Continuing Operations


 For the Year Ended
December 31,
 Variance  For the Year Ended
December 31,
 Variance 

 2013 2012 2011 2013 vs.
2012
 2012 vs.
2011
  2014 2013 2012 2014 vs.
2013
 2013 vs.
2012
 

 (in thousands, except percentage data)
  (in thousands, except percentage data)
 

Income from continuing operations

 $252,998 192,528 172,205 31% 12%  $313,331 252,998 192,528 24% 31% 

Net income per share from continuing operations, basic and diluted

 
$

2.96
 
2.25
 
2.01
 
32%
 
12%
  $3.71 2.96 2.25 25% 32% 

Operating Margin

 
28%
 
26%
 
25%
 
2%
 
1%
  30% 28% 26% 2% 2% 

Table of Contents

Total Revenues

        Total revenues increased 17% in 2014 compared to 2013, attributable to an increase in average assets under management of 19%, partially offset by a decrease in sales of 8%. Total revenues increased 17% in 2013 compared to 2012, attributable to increases in average assets under management of 19% and sales and other net inflows of 28%, while total revenues increased 5% in 2012 compared to 2011, attributable to an increase in average assets under management of 5%, partially offset by a decrease in sales and other net inflows of 6%.


 For the Year Ended
December 31,
 Variance  For the Year Ended
December 31,
 Variance 

 2013 2012 2011 2013 vs.
2012
 2012 vs.
2011
  2014 2013 2012 2014 vs.
2013
 2013 vs.
2012
 

 (in thousands, except percentage data)
  (in thousands, except percentage data)
 

Investment management fees

 $650,442 549,231 530,599 18% 4%  $768,102 650,442 549,231 18% 18% 

Underwriting and distribution fees

 582,819 496,465 469,484 17% 6%  678,678 582,819 496,465 16% 17% 

Shareholder service fees

 137,093 128,109 122,449 7% 5%  150,979 137,093 128,109 10% 7% 
           

Total revenues

 $1,370,354 1,173,805 1,122,532 17% 5%  $1,597,759 1,370,354 1,173,805 17% 17% 
           
           

Investment Management Fee Revenues

        Investment management fee revenues are earned forby providing investment advisory services to the Funds, the Selector Management Funds and to institutional and separate accounts. Investment management fee revenues increased $117.7 million, or 18%, in 2014 and increased $101.2 million, or 18%, in 2013 and increased $18.6 million, or 4%, in 2012.2013.

        Investment management fee revenues are based on the level of average assets under management and are affected by sales, financial market conditions, redemptions and the composition of assets. The following graph illustrates the direct relationship between average assets under management and investment management fee revenues for the years ending December 31, 2011, 2012, 2013 and 2013.2014.

        Revenues from investment management services provided to our retail mutual funds, which are distributed through the Wholesale, Advisors and Institutional channels, were $709.2 million in 2014 and increased $107.1 million, or 18%, compared to 2013, while the related retail average assets increased 17%. Investment management fee revenues increased at a greater rate than the related retail average assets due


Table of Contents

to a slight increase in the average management fee rate, from 62.7 basis points in 2013 to 62.9 basis points in 2014. Management fee waivers, which are recorded as an offset of management fees, partially offset the rate of the investment management fee increase. In 2014, we recorded $11.8 million in management fee waivers, of which $7.8 million was related to money market accounts. Revenues from investment management services provided to our retail mutual funds were $602.1 million in 2013 and increased $96.0 million, or 19%, compared to 2012, while the related retail average assets increased 20%. Investment management fee revenues increased at a lesser rate than the related retail average assets due to the effect of recording management fee waivers as an offset to investment management fees. Of the


Table of Contents

total management fee waivers recorded in 2013 of $10.1 million, $6.5 million related to money market accounts. Revenues from investment management services provided to our retail mutual funds were $506.1 million in 2012 and increased $16.1 million, or 3%, compared to 2011, while the related retail average assets increased 5%. Retail sales and other net inflows were $24.1 billion, $26.6 billion and $20.4 billion in 2014, 2013 and $21.0 billion in 2013, 2012, and 2011, respectively.

        Institutional and separate account revenues were $58.9 million, $48.3 million and $43.2 million in 2014, 2013 and $40.6 million in 2013, 2012, and 2011, respectively. The increase in revenues in 2014 compared to 2013 was primarily attributable to a 32% increase in average assets under management, while the increase in revenues in 2013 compared to 2012 was primarily attributable toa result of a 15% increase in average assets whileunder management. For the increasecomparative period 2014 to 2013, account revenues increased significantly less than the related average assets under management due to a decline in revenues in 2012 compared to 2011 wasthe average management fee rate driven by a resultmix-shift of a 10% increase in average assets.assets into investment styles and account types with lower management fee rates.

        In the Wholesale channel, the long-term redemption rates wererate (which excludes money market fund redemptions) was 34.8% in 2014, compared to 25.2% in 2013 compared toand 30.2% in 20122012. The increased rate in 2014 was primarily driven by redemptions in the Ivy Asset Strategy Fund and 29.5%Ivy High Income Fund. Prolonged redemptions in 2011. Long-termthe Wholesale channel could negatively affect revenues in future periods. The long-term redemption ratesrate (which excludeexcludes money market fund redemptions) in the Advisors channel werewas 8.3% in 2014 compared to 8.9% and 9.9% in 2013 compared to 9.9% and 10.0% in 2012, and 2011, respectively. We expect the Advisors channel long-term redemption rate to remain lower than that of the industry average due to the personal and customized nature in which our financial advisors provide service to our clients.

clients by focusing on meeting their long-term financial objectives. The long-term redemption rate for our Institutional channel washas decreased to 16.9% in 2014 compared to 20.0% in 2013 compared toand 24.2% in 2012 and 23.8% in 2011. Subadvisory and defined contribution pension business comprise more than 70% of the Institutional channel's assets as of December 31, 2013 and unlike defined benefit pension accounts, the active daily flows in or out of these accounts can result in an increase in contributions and withdrawals and impact the channel's redemption rate.2012.

Underwriting and Distribution

        We earn underwriting and distribution fee revenues primarily by distributing the Funds pursuant to an underwriting agreement with each Fund (except the Ivy Funds VIP as explained below) and, to a lesser extent, by distributing mutual funds offered by other unaffiliated companies. Pursuant to each agreement, we offer and sell the Funds' shares on a continuous basis (open-end funds) and pay certain costs associated with underwriting and distributing the Funds, including the costs of developing and producing sales literature and printing of prospectuses, which may be either partially or fully reimbursed by the Funds. The Funds are sold in various classes that are structured in ways that conform to industry standards (i.e., "front-end load," "back-end load," "level-load" and institutional).

        When a client purchases Class A or Class E shares (front-end load), the client pays an initial sales charge of up to 5.75% of the amount invested. The sales charge for Class A or Class E shares typically declines as the investment amount increases. In addition, investors may combine their purchases of all fund shares to qualify for a reduced sales charge. Class A shares purchased at net asset value are assessed a 1% contingent deferred sales charge ("CDSC") if the shares are redeemed within 12 months of purchase. When a client invests in an asset allocation product, Class A shares are purchased at net asset value. Wevalue and we do not charge an initial sales charge, butcharge. Although historically investors arein our asset allocation products were assessed a CDSC upon early redemption of shares, up to 3% of the amount originally invested and declining to zero for investments held more than three years.years, effective for purchases made beginning June 16, 2014, we no longer assess a CDSC to investors upon early redemption. For client purchases of Class B shares (back-end load) prior to January 1, 2014, we do not charge an initial sales charge, but we do charge a CDSC upon early redemption of shares, up to 5% of the lesser of the current market net asset


Table of Contents

value or the purchase cost of the redeemed shares in the first year and declining to zero for shares held for more than six years. Class B shares convert to Class A shares after seven years. Effective January 1, 2014, the Company suspended sales of Class B shares. When a client purchases Class C shares (level-load), we do not charge an initial sales charge, but we do charge investors who redeem their Class C shares in the first year a CDSC of 1% of the current market net asset value or the purchase cost of the shares redeemed, whichever is less.


Table of Contents

        Under a Rule 12b-1 service plan, the Funds may charge a maximum fee of 0.25% of the average daily net assets under management for Class B, C, E and Ivy Funds Y shares for expenses paid to broker/dealers and other sales professionals in connection with providing ongoing services to the Funds' shareholders and/or maintaining the Funds' shareholder accounts, with the exception of the Funds' Class R shares, for which the maximum fee is 0.50%. and for the Class I, R6 and Advisors Funds Y shares, which do not charge a service fee. The Funds' Class B and Class C shares may charge a maximum of 0.75% of the average daily net assets under management under a Rule 12b-1 distribution plan to broker/dealers and other sales professionals for their services in connection with distributing shares of that class. The Funds' Class A shares may charge a maximum fee of 0.25% of the average daily net assets under management under a Rule 12b-1 service and distribution plan for expenses detailed previously. The Rule 12b-1 plans are subject to annual approval by the Funds' board of trustees, including a majority of the disinterested members, by votes cast in person at a meeting called for the purpose of voting on such approval. All Funds may terminate the service plan at any time with approval of fund trustees or portfolio shareholders (a majority of either) without penalty.

        We offer asset allocation investment advisory products that utilize our Funds. These products offer clients a selection of traditional asset allocation models, as well as features such as systematic rebalancing and client and advisor participation in determining asset allocation across asset classes. We earn asset-based fees on our asset allocation investment advisory products.

        We distribute variable products offering the Ivy Funds VIP as investment vehicles pursuant to general agency arrangements with our business partners and receive commissions, marketing allowances and other compensation as stipulated by such agreements. In connection with these arrangements, the Ivy Funds VIP are offered and sold on a continuous basis.

        In addition to distributing variable products, we distribute a number of other insurance products through our insurance agency subsidiaries,subsidiary, including individual term life, group term life, whole life, accident and health, long-term care, Medicare supplement and disability insurance. We receive commissions and compensation from various underwriters for distributing these products. We are not an underwriter for any insurance policies.


Table of Contents

Underwriting and Distribution Fee Revenues and Expenses

        The following tables illustrate our underwriting and distribution fee revenues and expenses segregated by distribution channel for the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 2012 and 2011:2012:


 Total  
  
 Total  
  
 

 2013 2012 2011 2013 vs.
2012
 2012 vs.
2011
 2014 vs.
2013
 2013 vs.
2012
 

 (in thousands, except percentage data)
 2014 2013 2012 

Revenue

 $582,819 496,465 469,484 17% 6%

Expenses — Direct

 (524,071) (444,854) (428,447) 18% 4%

Expenses — Indirect

 (152,642) (145,127) (131,772) 5% 10%
           (in thousands, except percentage data)
 

Revenues

 $678,678 582,819 496,465 16% 17% 

Expenses—Direct

 (615,954) (524,071) (444,854) 18% 18% 

Expenses—Indirect

 (167,373) (152,642) (145,127) 10% 5% 

Net Distribution (Costs)/Excess

 $(93,894) (93,516) (90,735) 0% -3% $(104,649) (93,894) (93,516) –11% 0% 
          
          

 

 
 Wholesale Channel  
  
 
 2013 2012 2011 2013 vs.
2012
 2012 vs.
2011

Revenue

 $207,419  178,700  179,407  16%  0%

Expenses — Direct

  (268,047)  (224,744)  (224,089)  19%  0%

Expenses — Indirect

  (43,923)  (39,929)  (34,358)  10%  16%
           

Net Distribution (Costs)/Excess

 $(104,551)  (85,973)  (79,040)  -22%  -9%
           
 
 Wholesale Channel  
  
 
 
 2014 vs.
2013
 2013 vs.
2012
 
 
 2014 2013 2012 

Revenues

 $234,939  207,419  178,700  13%  16% 

Expenses—Direct

  (302,459) (268,047) (224,744) 13%  19% 

Expenses—Indirect

  (51,675) (43,923) (39,929) 18%  10% 

Net Distribution (Costs)/Excess

 $(119,195) (104,551) (85,973) –14%  –22% 


 
 Advisors Channel  
  
 
 2013 2012 2011 2013 vs.
2012
 2012 vs.
2011

Revenue

 $375,400  317,765  290,077  18%  10%

Expenses — Direct

  (256,024)  (220,110)  (204,358)  16%  8%

Expenses — Indirect

  (108,719)  (105,198)  (97,414)  3%  8%
           

Net Distribution (Costs)/Excess

 $10,657  (7,543)  (11,695)  241%  36%
           
 
 Advisors Channel  
  
 
 
 2014 vs.
2013
 2013 vs.
2012
 
 
 2014 2013 2012 

Revenues

 $443,739  375,400  317,765  18%  18% 

Expenses—Direct

  (313,495) (256,024) (220,110) 22%  16% 

Expenses—Indirect

  (115,698) (108,719) (105,198) 6%  3% 

Net Distribution (Costs)/Excess

 $14,546  10,657  (7,543) 36%  241% 

Table of Contents

        The following tables summarize the significant components of underwriting and distribution fee revenues segregated by distribution channel for the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 2012 and 2011:2012:


 Total Total

 2013 2012 2011 2014 2013 2012

 (in thousands)
 (in thousands)

Underwriting and distribution fee revenues:

            

Rule 12b-1 service and distribution fees

 $304,659 264,192 262,169 $346,304 304,659 264,192

Fee-based asset allocation product revenues

 155,501 116,407 83,331 202,178 155,501 116,407

Sales commissions on front-end load mutual fund and variable annuity sales

 75,008 70,996 80,321 78,484 75,008 70,996

Sales commissions on other products

 22,069 23,198 25,370 24,024 22,069 23,198

Other revenues

 25,582 21,672 18,293 27,688 25,582 21,672
      

Total

 $582,819 496,465 469,484 $678,678 582,819 496,465
      

 


 Wholesale Channel Wholesale Channel

 2013 2012 2011 2014 2013 2012

 (in thousands)
 (in thousands)

Underwriting and distribution fee revenues:

            

Rule 12b-1 service and distribution fees

 $198,283 170,799 170,279 $224,669 198,283 170,799

Sales commissions on front-end load mutual fund sales

 5,506 3,989 4,948 5,843 5,506 3,989

Other revenues

 3,630 3,912 4,180 4,427 3,630 3,912
      

Total

 $207,419 178,700 179,407 $234,939 207,419 178,700
      

 


 Advisors Channel Advisors Channel

 2013 2012 2011 2014 2013 2012

 (in thousands)
 (in thousands)

Underwriting and distribution fee revenues:

            

Rule 12b-1 service and distribution fees

 $106,376 93,393 91,890 $121,635 106,376 93,393

Fee-based asset allocation product revenues

 155,501 116,407 83,331 202,178 155,501 116,407

Sales commissions on front-end load mutual fund and variable annuity sales

 69,502 67,007 75,373 72,641 69,502 67,007

Sales commissions on other products

 22,069 23,198 25,370 24,024 22,069 23,198

Other revenues

 21,952 17,760 14,113 23,261 21,952 17,760
      

Total

 $375,400 317,765 290,077 $443,739 375,400 317,765
      

Table of Contents

        A significant portion of underwriting and distribution revenues are received from Rule 12b-1 asset-based service and distribution fees earned on load, load-waived and deferred-load products sold by our financial advisors and third party intermediaries. Underwriting and distribution revenues also include asset-based fees earned on our asset allocation products and commissions, sales commissions charged on front-end load products sold by our financial advisors, including mutual fund Class A shares (those sponsored by the Company and those underwritten by other non-proprietary mutual fund companies), variable annuities, sales of other insurance products, and financial planning fees. A significant amount of Wholesale channel mutual fund sales are load-waived.

        We divide the costs of underwriting and distribution into two components—direct costs and indirect costs. Direct selling costs fluctuate with sales volume, such as advisor commissions and management commissions paid to field management, advisor incentive compensation, commissions paid to third parties and to our own wholesalers, and related management commissions in our Wholesale channel. Direct selling costs also fluctuate with assets under management, such as Rule 12b-1 service and distribution fees paid to the samethird parties. Indirect selling costs are fixed costs that do not necessarily fluctuate with sales levels. Indirect costs include expenses incurred by our home office and field offices such as wholesaler salaries, marketing costs, promotion and distribution of our products through the Wholesale and Advisors channels; support and management of our financial advisors such as field office overhead, sales programs and technology infrastructure; and costs of managing and supporting our wholesale efforts through technology infrastructure and personnel. While the Institutional channel does have marketing expenses, those expenses are accounted for in compensation and related costs and general and administrative expense instead of underwriting and distribution because of the channel's integration with our investment management division, its relatively small size and the fact that there are no Rule 12b-1 fees, loads, CDSCs, or any other charges to separate account clients except investment management fees.

        We recover certain of our underwriting and distribution costs through Rule 12b-1 service and distribution fees, which are paid by the Funds. All Rule 12b-1 service and distribution fee revenue received from the Funds is recorded on a gross basis.

        Underwriting and distribution revenues earned in 20132014 increased by $86.4$95.9 million, or 17%16%, compared to 2012. In the Wholesale channel, Rule 12b-1 asset based service and distribution fees accounted for most of the channel's $28.7 million revenue increase year over year, driven by a 24% increase in this channel's average mutual fund assets under management.2013. Rule 12b-1 asset based service and distribution fees increased less than the$41.6 million, or 14%, year over year, driven by a 15% increase in average mutual fund assets in each channel due to the growth in Class I shares,under management for which we do not earn Rule 12b-1 fees.revenues. Approximately 75% of Rule 12b-1 revenues earned are a pass-through to direct underwriting and distribution expenses. Revenues from fee-based asset allocation products continued to be a meaningful contributor to revenues, increasing to 46% of Advisors channel underwriting and distribution revenues in 2014 compared to 41% in 2013. Fee-based asset allocation assets grew from $14.4 billion at December 31, 2013 to $17.3 billion at December 31, 2014, generating an increase of fee-based asset allocation revenue of $46.7 million, or 30%, as advisors increasingly utilize fee-based programs for their clients.

        Underwriting and distribution revenues earned in 2013 increased by $86.4 million, or 17%, compared to 2012. Increased Rule 12b-1 asset-based service and distribution fees of $40.5 million, or 15%, resulted from the 17% increase in average mutual fund assets under management for which we earn Rule 12b-1 revenues. Revenues from fee-based asset allocation products increased to 41% of Advisors channel underwriting and distribution revenues in 2013 compared to 37% in 2012. Fee-based asset allocation assets grew from $10.1 billion at December 31, 2012 to $14.4 billion at December 31, 2013. Advisors channel average mutual fund assets under management increased by 15% year over year, and generated Rule 12b-12013, generating an increase of fee-based asset based service and distribution feesallocation revenue of $106.4$39.1 million, in 2013. In 2013, other revenues in the Advisors channel include E&O insurance premiums of $2.8 million collected from our advisors. Prior to 2013, these premiums were netted in operating expenses.or 34%.

        Underwriting and distribution revenues earnedexpenses in 20122014 increased by $27.0$106.6 million, or 6%16%, compared to 2011. Increased2013. Direct expenses in the Wholesale channel increased $34.4 million compared to 2013 as a result of an increase in average wholesale assets under management, partially offset by lower sales volume year over year. We incurred higher Rule 12b-1 asset-based service and distribution fees of $2.0 million resulted from the increase in average mutual fund assets under management. Revenues from fee-based asset allocation products increased $33.1 million comparedexpenses paid to 2011, driventhird party distributors, partially offset by advisory asset growth year over year. Technology fees collected from our advisors increased other revenueslower dealer compensation. Direct expenses in the Advisors channel by $3.0 million. Prior to the fourth quarter of 2011, these fees were netted in operating expenses. Offsetting these increases, revenues from mutual funds and variable annuity products sold in the Advisors channel decreased by $8.4 million.grew


Table of Contents

faster than revenue due to increased advisor payouts, as a result of a change in the Advisor compensation plan. Indirect expenses across both channels increased $14.7 million, or 10%, compared to 2013, primarily due to increased computer services and software expenses, employee compensation and benefits and marketing expenses.

        Underwriting and distribution expenses in 2013 increased by $86.7 million, or 15%, compared to 2012. Direct expenses in the Wholesale channel increased $43.3 million compared to 2012 as a result of an increase in average wholesale assets under management and higher sales volume year over year. We incurred higher dealer compensation, paid to third party distributors, increased Rule 12b-1 asset-based service and distribution expenses paid to third party distributors and higher wholesaler commissions. Direct expenses in the Advisors channel increased $35.9 million, or 16%, due to increased commissions related to the sale of fee-based asset allocation products of $27.4 million and increased Rule 12b-1 asset-based service and distribution expenses of $6.2 million. Indirectexpenses. Across both channels, indirect expenses increased a total of $7.5 million, or 5%, compared to 2012. The indirect expenses increase of $4.0 million in the Wholesale channel was2012, primarily due to higherincreased computer services and software expenses, marketing expenses, group health costs and marketing costs. The increase in indirect expenses in the Advisors channel of $3.5 million was due to higher computer services and software costs, higher group health insurance costs and higher sales convention costs,expenses, partially offset by lower costs in 2013 associated with our electronic books and records conversion project.

        Underwriting and distribution expenses in 2012 increased by $29.8 million, or 5%, compared to 2011. Direct expenses in the Wholesale channel increased $0.7 million compared to 2011 as a result of an increase in average wholesale assets under management, partially offset by lower sales volume year over year. We incurred higher dealer compensation paid to third party distributors and increased Rule 12b-1 asset-based service and distribution expenses, partially offset by lower wholesaler commissions. Direct expenses in the Advisors channel increased $15.8 million, or 8% due to increased commissions related to the sale of fee-based asset allocation products of $25.1 million, partially offset by lower commissions on variable annuity products of $6.1 million. Indirect expenses increased a total of $13.4 million compared to 2011. The indirect expenses increase of $5.6 million in the Wholesale channel was due to increased marketing costs and employee compensation and benefits expenses. The increase in indirect expenses in the Advisors channel of $7.8 million was due to costs associated with our electronic books and records conversion project and increased employee compensation and benefits expenses.

Shareholder Service Fees Revenue

        Shareholder service fee revenue primarily includes transfer agency fees, custodian fees from retirement plan accounts, and portfolio accounting and administration fees. Transfer agency fees and portfolio accounting and administration fees are asset-based revenues or account-based revenues, while custodian fees from retirement plan accounts are based on the number of client accounts.

        During 2014, shareholder service fees revenue increased $13.9 million, or 10%, over 2013. Of the total increase, asset-based fees accounted for $11.5 million and account-based fees increased $2.7 million, partially offset by a decrease in retirement plan fees. A majority of the increase in asset-based fees was driven by fees for the I, Y and R share classes which increased $10.8 million, or 30%, when compared to 2013. Assets in the I, Y and R share classes grew from an average of $23.8 billion at December 31, 2013 to an average of $31.0 billion at December 31, 2014, representing an increase of 30%. The account-based fees increase of $2.7 million was due to a 2% increase in the number of accounts compared to the same period.

        During 2013, shareholder service fees revenue increased $9.0 million, or 7%, over 2012. The increase is due to higher asset-based fees of $9.6 million year over yearyear. Of the increase in asset-based fees, fees for the I, Y and R share classes.classes increased $8.7 million, or 32%, when compared to 2012. Assets in the I, Y and R shares classes grew from an average of $18.1 billion in 2012 to an average of $23.8 billion in 2013, representing an increase of 31%. The increase in asset-based fees was partially offset by lower account-based fees, due to a decrease in technology reimbursements from the Funds. The decrease in technology reimbursement was a result of favorable pricing received on the renewal of a vendor contract effective at the beginning of 2013, and also resulted in lower general and administrative expenses for the year.

        During 2012, shareholder service fees revenue increased $5.7 million, or 5%, over 2011. The majority of the increase is due to higher asset-based fees of $4.5 million year over year in the I, Y and R share classes. Assets in the I, Y and R shares classes grew from an average of $15.4 billion in 2011 to an average of $18.1 billion in 2012, an increase of 18%. Additionally, account-based revenues increased $1.2 million, due to a 1% increase in the average number of client accounts.

Total Operating Expenses

        Operating expenses increased $127.6 million, or 13%, in 2014 compared to 2013 primarily due to increased underwriting and distribution expenses, increased general and administrative costs and an intangible asset impairment charge, partially offset by decreased subadvisory fees. Underwriting and distribution expenses are discussed above.


Table of Contents

        Operating expenses increased $114.5 million, or 13%, in 2013 compared to 2012 and $35 million, or 4%, in 2012 compared to 2011, primarily due to increased underwriting and distribution expenses and


Table of Contents

compensation and related costs, partially offset by decreased subadvisory fees. Underwriting and distribution expenses are discussed above.


 For the Year Ended
December 31,
 Variance For the Year Ended
December 31,
 Variance

 2013 2012 2011 2013 vs.
2012
 2012 vs.
2011
 2014 2013 2012 2014 vs.
2013
 2013 vs.
2012

 (in thousands, except percentage data)
 (in thousands, except percentage data)

Underwriting and distribution

 $676,713 589,981 560,219 15% 5% $783,327 676,713 589,981 16% 15%

Compensation and related costs

 197,597 171,775 157,332 15% 9% 194,410 197,597 171,775 –2% 15%

General and administrative

 86,419 75,332 74,110 15% 2% 104,637 86,419 75,332 21% 15%

Subadvisory fees

 12,220 21,009 29,885 -42% -30% 8,436 12,220 21,009 –31% –42%

Depreciation

 12,834 13,211 14,764 -3% -11% 14,634 12,834 13,211 14% –3%
          

Intangible asset impairment

 7,900   NM NM

Total operating expenses

 $985,783 871,308 836,310 13% 4% $1,113,344 985,783 871,308 13% 13%
          
          

Compensation and Related Costs


 For the Year Ended
December 31,
 Variance For the Year Ended
December 31,
 Variance

 2013 2012 2011 2013 vs.
2012
 2012 vs.
2011
 2014 2013 2012 2014 vs.
2013
 2013 vs.
2012

 (in thousands, except percentage data)
 (in thousands, except percentage data)

Compensation and related costs

 $197,597 171,775 157,332 15% 9% $194,410 197,597 171,775 –2% 15%

As a percent of revenue

 14% 15% 14% -1% 1% 12% 14% 15% –2% –1%

        Compensation and related costs in 2014 decreased $3.2 million, or 2%, compared to 2013. A decrease in incentive compensation of $6.1 million and a decrease in pension expense of $3.6 million were the primary drivers. Expense also decreased $2.3 million related to our deferred compensation program for portfolio managers due to market depreciation. Partially offsetting these decreases were an increase in base salaries, payroll taxes and savings plan costs of $5.7 million due to an increase in headcount and annual merit increases during 2014, and an increase in share-based compensation of $1.0 million due to higher amortization expense associated with our nonvested restricted stock. In addition, higher compensation costs related to Institutional channel marketing contributed $0.8 million compared to 2013 and group insurance expense increased $0.5 million due to unfavorable claims experience.

        Compensation and related costs in 2013 increased $25.8 million, or 15%, compared to 2012. An incentive compensation expense increase of $12.9 million was the primary driver. Base salaries and payroll taxes contributed $6.7 million to the increase due to an increase in average headcount of 3% and annual merit increases during 2013. Share-based compensation increased $4.4 million compared to 2012 primarily due to higher amortization expense associated with our April 2013, December 2012 and April 2012 grants of nonvested stock compared to grants that became fully vested in 2013.restricted stock. Group insurance costs increased $1.1 million year over year based on unfavorable claims experience.


        Compensation and related costs in 2012 increased $14.4 million, or 9%, compared to 2011. Base salaries and payroll taxes contributed $6.1 million to the increase, due to an increase in average headcountTable of 6% and annual merit increases during 2012. Share-based compensation increased $3.4 million compared to 2011 primarily due to higher amortization expense associated with our April 2012, December 2011 and April 2011 grants of nonvested stock compared to grants that became fully vested in 2012. Pension costs increased $3.2 million year over year, incentive compensation expense increased $0.9 million and group insurance costs increased $0.6 million based on unfavorable claims experience.Contents

General and Administrative Expenses


 For the Year Ended
December 31,
 Variance For the Year Ended
December 31,
 Variance

 2013 2012 2011 2013 vs.
2012
 2012 vs.
2011
 2014 2013 2012 2014 vs.
2013
 2013 vs.
2012

 (in thousands, except percentage data)
 (in thousands, except percentage data)

General and administrative expenses

 $86,419 75,332 74,110 15% 2% $104,637 86,419 75,332 21% 15%

As a percent of revenue

 6% 6% 7% - -1% 7% 6% 6% 1% 0%

Table of Contents

        General and administrative expenses are operating costs other than those related to compensation and to distribution efforts, including, but not limited to, computer services and software costs, telecommunications, facilities costs of our home offices, costs of professional services including legal and accounting, and insurance.

        General and administrative expenses increased $11.1$18.2 million for the year ended December 31, 20132014 compared to 2012.2013. Included in 2013 were one-time structuring, offering and organizational costs for the launch of the Ivy High Income Opportunities Fund in the amount of $6.7 million. Excluding these charges in 2013, general and administrative expenses increased $24.9 million, due primarily to higher consulting costs of $8.7 million, of which $5.7 million is related to technology consulting, increased dealer service costs based on higher asset levels in certain share classes of $5.4 million, higher computer services and software costs of $4.0 million and increased legal, temporary office staff and fund expense costs. We anticipate that computer services and software expenses may increase in 2015 based on our current technology initiatives.

        General and administrative expenses increased $11.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2013 compared to 2012. During 2012, we recorded a charge of $5.0 million to reflect the impairment of certain capitalized software development costs. Also included in 2012 was an adjustment to lower general and administrative expenses by $3.5 million to reflect lower estimated costs of distributing an SEC market timing settlement dating back to 2006, and a reduction in the estimated legal costs related to an ongoing class action suit. Excluding these charges in both years,2012 and the fund launch costs in 2013, general and administrative expenses increased $5.9 million, due primarily to increased dealer service costs based on higher asset levels in certain share classes of $5.0 million, higher national branding campaign expenses and temporary office staff costs. Partially offsetting these increases were lower computer services and software expenses and legal costs. We expect computer services and software expenses to increase in 2014 based on our current technology initiatives.

        General and administrative expenses increased $1.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2012 compared to 2011. Included in 2012 is a net $1.5 million expense in software development impairment charges and SEC settlement and legal adjustments as noted above. Included in 2011 is a $1.8 million charge related to the write-off of software capitalization costs due to the discontinuation of use of certain software licenses. Excluding these items in both years, general and administrative expenses increased $1.5 million, due primarily to increased costs incurred for third party servicing of our shareholder accounts of $3.1 million, higher computer services and software costs and increased costs for temporary office staff related to our electronic books and records conversion project. Costs decreased related to our national branding campaign year over year.

Subadvisory Fees

        Subadvisory fees represent fees paid to other asset managers for providing advisory services for certain mutual fund portfolios. These expenses reduce our operating margin since we pay out approximately half of our management fee revenuerevenues received from subadvised products. Gross management fee revenues for products subadvised by others were $24.0$15.9 million for the year ended December 31, 20132014 compared to $24.0 million and $41.7 million for 2013 and $59.3 million for 2012, and 2011, respectively, due to a 24% decrease in average assets from 2013 to 2014 and a 40% decrease in average assets from 2012 to 2013 and a 31% decrease in average assets from 2011 to 2012.2013. The decrease in average net assets from 2012 to 2013for both periods is a result of internalizing the management of the Global Natural Resources funds after the portfolio manager's retirement from Mackenzie Financial Corporation ("MFC"), the subadvisor, during the third quarter of 2013. Subadvisory expenses followed the same pattern for the past three years.

        SubadvisedIntangible Asset Impairment

        During the third quarter of 2014, we recorded an intangible asset impairment charge of $7.9 million related to our subadvisory agreement to manage certain mutual fund products for MFC recorded in


Table of Contents

connection with our purchase of Mackenzie Investment Management, Inc. in 2002. The impairment charge was a result of a decline in assets under management atattributable to a realignment of MFC's fund offerings and additional asset reductions. It is possible that the assets we manage for MFC may decrease in the future, which would require us to assess the need for an additional write-down of the intangible asset associated with our subadvisory agreement with MFC.

        At December 31, 2013 were $1.8 billion compared to the annual average of $3.0 billion for 2013. Since subadvisory expenses are a function of sales, redemptions and market action for subadvised assets, assuming a flat market in 2014, the lowerremaining balance of our subadvisory intangible asset base will likely result inwas $8.4 million. The deferred tax liability established as a decreasepart of purchase accounting related to subadvisory expenses for the coming year.this intangible asset was $3.1 million as of December 31, 2014.

Other Income and Expenses

Investment and Other Income

        Investment and other income increased $10.1decreased $3.1 million in 20132014 compared to 2012. The current year included mark-to-market gains on mutual fund holdings2013, primarily due to a $9.3 million decrease in our trading portfolio of $3.9 million compared to gains in 2012 of $4.8 million. We recorded realized gains on the sale of available for sale mutualaffiliated funds of $12.6(mutual funds and UCITS sub-funds) and a $1.5 million during 2013 compared to $3.2decrease in mark-to-market gains on affiliated fund holdings in our trading portfolio. A $3.0 million increase in 2012. We recorded mutualaffiliated fund dividend income of $4.3 million in 2013 compared to $1.6 million in 2012.partially offset the decrease. In 2013, and 2012, we recorded losses related to our investment in a limited partnership of $4.9 million and $2.0 million, respectively.


Table of Contentsmillion.

        Investment and other income increased $7.7$10.1 million in 20122013 compared to 2011. The current year included mark-to-market gains on mutual fund holdings2012, primarily due to an $11.6 million increase in our trading portfolio of $4.8 million compared to losses in 2011 of $1.1 million. We recorded realized gains on the sale of available for sale mutualaffiliated funds of $3.2and a $2.7 million increase in affiliated fund dividend income. A $2.9 million increase in partnership losses and $2.2a $0.9 million decrease in 2012 and 2011, respectively. Interest andmark-to-market gains related toon affiliated fund holdings in our corporate bondtrading portfolio increased $0.8 million compared topartially offset the prior year. Write-downs of our investment in limited partnerships increased $0.5 million in 2012.increase.

Interest Expense

        Interest expense was $11.0 million, $11.2 million and $11.3 million in 2014, 2013 and $11.4 million in 2013, 2012, and 2011, respectively. Although the majority of our interest expense is fixed based on our $190.0 million senior unsecured notes, we did benefit from lower costs associated with the renewal of our credit facility in 2013.

Income Taxes

        Our effective income tax rate from continuing operations was 35.7%36.1%, 35.7% and 36.0% in 2014, 2013 and 37.8% in 2013, 2012, and 2011, respectively. The Company sold subsidiariesLegend in 2009 and 2013, which generated a capital lossesloss available to offset potential future capital gains. Due to the character of the lossesloss and the limited carryforward period permitted by law, a valuation allowance was recorded on a portion of thesethis capital losses.loss. During 2014, 2013 2012 and 2011,2012, realized capital gains allowed for a release of the valuation allowance of $5.0 million, $7.2 million $2.3 million and $0.4$2.3 million, respectively. In each year, this release of the valuation allowance was recorded as a reduction to income tax expense and, as a result, decreased our effective tax rate. The higher effective tax rate in 2014 as compared to 2013 was primarily the result of lower investment gains in 2014. Likewise, the lower effective tax rate in 2013 as compared to 2012 and 2012 as compared to 2011 werewas primarily the result of theadditional utilization of capital losses in 2013 and 2012.2013.

        Our 2014, 2013 2012 and 20112012 effective tax rates from continuing operations, removing the effects of the valuation allowance, would have been 37.5%37.1%, 36.8%37.5% and 38.0%36.8%, respectively. The effective income tax rate, exclusive of the valuation allowance, decreased in 2014 as compared to 2013 due to higher income before taxes, which diluted the impact of expenses that are not deductible for income tax purposes. Additionally, the Company generated larger state tax incentives related to capital expenditures made by the Company in 2014 as compared to 2013. When the statute of limitations lapses and a tax year is no longer subject to potential future audit, the Company recognizes any tax benefits previously considered uncertain related to that tax year. The 2013 effective income tax rate, exclusive of the valuation allowance, increased in 2013 as compared to 2012 due to less recognition of tax benefits as a result of the lapse of the statute of limitations. Also in 2012, the Company identified favorable treatment on expenses previously considered nondeductible for income tax purposes, thereby generating tax refunds related to the 2009 and 2010 tax years. The 2012 effective income tax rate, exclusive of the valuation allowance, decreased as compared to 2011 due to higher recognition of tax benefits as a result of the lapse of the statute of limitations and the identification of favorable treatment of expenses previously considered nondeductible for income tax purposes.


Table of Contents

Liquidity and Capital Resources

        The following table summarizes certain key financial data relating to our liquidity and capital resources:


 For the Year Ended
December 31,
 Variance  For the Year Ended
December 31,
 Variance 

 2013 vs.
2012
 2012 vs.
2011
  2014 vs.
2013
 2013 vs.
2012
 

 2013 2012 2011  2014 2013 2012 

 (in thousands, except percentage data)
  (in thousands, except percentage data)
 

Balance Sheet Data: (1)

                      

Cash and cash equivalents

 $487,845 328,027 323,916 49% 1%  $566,621 487,845 328,027 16% 49% 

Cash and cash equivalents - restricted

 121,419 92,980 50,556 31% 84% 

Cash and cash equivalents—restricted

 76,595 121,419 92,980 –37% 31% 

Investment securities

 201,348 176,142 134,262 14% 31%  243,283 201,348 176,142 21% 14% 

Long-term debt

 
190,000
 
190,000
 
190,000
 
0%
 
0%
  
190,000
 
190,000
 
190,000
 
0%
 
0%
 

Cash Flow Data:

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Cash flows from operating activities

 286,916 233,435 283,139(2) 23% -18%  345,042 286,916 233,435 20% 23% 

Cash flows from investing activities

 25,622 (17,129) (30,242) -250% -43%  (39,108) 25,622 (17,129) –253% –250% 

Cash flows from financing activities

 (155,023) (213,059) (121,129) 27% -76%  (227,158) (155,023) (213,059) –47% 27% 

(1)
Balance sheet data excludes discontinued operations held for sale for all periods presented.

(2)
Maturities of U.S. treasury bills and commercial paper of $66.0 million during 2011 is included in cash flows from operating activities.2012.

        Our operations provide much of the cash necessary to fund our priorities, as follows:

Finance Internal Growth

        We use cash to fund growth in our distribution channels. Our Wholesale channel which has a higher cost to gather assets, requires cash outlays for wholesaler commissions and commissions to third parties on deferred load product sales. We continue to invest in our Advisors channel by providing additional support to our advisors through home office resources, wholesaling efforts and enhanced technology tools. Across both channels, we provide seed money for new products.

        We are currently investing in technology initiatives to modernize and optimize our technology environment. Initiatives underway include upgrading our infrastructure, network and security, moving to distributed applications, and building system architecture.

Pay Dividends

        The Board of Directors approved an increase in the quarterly dividend on our common stock from $0.28$0.34 per share to $0.34$0.43 per share beginning with ourthe dividend we declared in the fourth quarter 2013 dividend,2014 and paid on February 3, 2014.2, 2015 to stockholders of record on January 12, 2015. We paid a special cash dividend on our common stock of $1.00 per share in 2012. Dividends on our common stock resulted in financing cash outflows of $115.3 million, $96.0 million and $171.3 million in 2014, 2013 and $68.8 million in 2013, 2012, and 2011, respectively.

Repurchase Our Stock

        In both 2013 and 2012,2014, we purchased 1.52.3 million shares of our Class A common stock, compared to 2.01.5 million shares in 2011.both 2013 and 2012. These share repurchase amounts included 599,340 shares, 665,035 shares 568,568 shares and 494,207568,568 shares from employees who elected to tender shares to cover their minimum tax withholdings with respect to vesting of stock awards during the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 2012 and 2011,2012, respectively.


Table of Contents

        In the future, we plan to repurchase shares, at a minimum, to offset dilution from shares issued for employee stock-based compensation programs. During 2014,2015, we estimate that we will repurchase approximately 600500 thousand shares from employees who elect to tender shares to cover their minimum tax withholdings arising from the vesting of nonvested shares.

Operating Cash Flows

        Cash from operations is our primary source of funds and increased $53.5$58.1 million from 20122013 to 2013.2014. The increase is primarily due to increased net income before non-cash charges compared to the prior year.

        The payable to investment companies for securities, payable to customers and other receivables accounts can fluctuate significantly based on trading activity at the end of a reporting period. Changes in these accounts result in variances within cash from operations on the statement of cash flows; however, there is no impact to the Company's liquidity and operations for the variances in these accounts.

        We payDuring 2014, we paid our financial advisors and third parties upfront commissions on the sale of Class B and C shares and certain fee-based asset allocation products. Effective January 1, 2014, we suspended sales of Class B shares, but prior to that date, we paid upfront commissions on Class B shares as well. Funding of such commissions during the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012 and 2011 totaled $41.0 million, $68.5 million and $54.4 million, and $57.9 million, respectively. The driversIn 2014, 57% of the commission funding in 2013 werewas related to Class C shares and 43% of the commission funding was related to fee-based asset allocation products, for which $37.3 million was funded, and Class C shares, for which $24.6 million was funded. In 2012, $28.0 million was funded for fee-based asset allocation products and $19.0 million was funded for Class C shares.products. During 2011,2013, commission funding for fee-based asset allocation products and Class C shares were $26.5was 54% and 36% of the annual commission funding, respectively. In 2012, 51% of the commission funding was related to fee-based asset allocation products and 35% was related to Class C shares. Based on changes to the advisor compensation plan in the second quarter of 2014, we expect payment of upfront fund commission for certain fee-based asset allocation products will decline in future periods.

        A contribution of $20.0 million and $23.0 million, respectively.

        Contributionswas made to our pension plan are not expected to exceed $20 million for 2014. A contribution of $10.0 million was made to the plan in January 2014.2015, and no further contributions are planned for 2015.

Investing Cash Flows

        Investing activities consist primarily of the purchase and sale of available for sale investment securities, as well as capital expenditures. We expect our 20142015 capital expenditures to be in the range of $25.0$20.0 to $35.0$30.0 million.

Financing Cash Flows

        As noted previously, dividends and stock repurchases accounted for a majority of our financing cash outflows in 2013.2014.

        On August 31, 2010, the Company entered into an agreement to complete a $190.0 million private placement of senior unsecured notes that were issued and sold in two tranches: $95.0 million bearing interest at 5.0% and maturing January 13, 2018, Series A, and $95.0 million bearing interest of 5.75% and maturing January 13, 2021, Series B (collectively, the "Senior Notes"). The agreement contained a delayed funding provision that allowed the Company to draw down the proceeds in January 2011 when the 5.6% senior notes (the "Notes") matured. The Company used the proceeds of the issuance and sale of the Senior Notes to repay the Notes in full the Notes.full. Interest is payable semi-annually in January and July of each year. The most restrictive provisions of the agreement require the Company to maintain a consolidated leverage ratio not to exceed 3.0 to 1.0 for four consecutive quarters and a consolidated interest coverage ratio of not less than 4.0 to 1.0 for four consecutive quarters. The Company was in compliance with these covenants and similar covenants in prior facilities for all periods presented. As of December 31, 2013,2014, the Company's consolidated leverage ratio was 0.40.3 to 1.0, and consolidated interest coverage ratio was 42.252.3 to 1.0.

        The Company entered into a five year revolving credit facility (the "Credit Facility") with various lenders, effective June 28, 2013, which provides for initial borrowings of up to $125.0 million and replaced


Table of Contents

the Company's previous revolving credit facility. Lenders may, at their option upon the Company's request, expand the facility to $200.0 million. There were no borrowings under the Credit Facility at December 31,


Table of Contents

2013 2014 or at any point during the year. The Credit Facility's covenants match those outlined above for the Senior Notes.

Short Term Liquidity and Capital Requirements

        Management believes its available cash, marketable securities and expected cash flow from operations will be sufficient to fund its short-term operating and capital requirements during 2014.2015. Expected short-term uses of cash include dividend payments, interest payments on outstanding debt, income tax payments, seed money for new products, share repurchases, payment of deferred commissions to our financial advisors and third parties, pension funding, capital expenditures and home office leasehold and building improvements, and could include strategic acquisitions.

Long Term Liquidity and Capital Requirements

        Expected long-term capital requirements include indebtedness, operating leases and purchase obligations, and potential recognition of tax liabilities, summarized in the following table as of December 31, 2013.2014. Purchase obligations include amounts that will be due for the purchase of goods and services to be used in our operations under long-term commitments or contracts. The majority of our purchase obligations are reimbursable to us by the Funds.


 Total 2014 2015-
2016
 2017-
2018
 Thereafter/
Indeterminate
  Total 2015 2016-
2017
 2018-
2019
 Thereafter/
Indeterminate
 

 (in thousands)
  (in thousands)
 

Long-term debt obligations, including interest

 $252,344 10,213 20,425 113,050 108,656  $242,131 10,213 20,425 108,300 103,193 

Non-cancelable operating lease commitments

 87,241 21,055 31,553 17,629 17,004  85,133 21,927 33,098 15,755 14,353 

Purchase obligations

 243,786 45,732 68,130 61,300 68,624  228,248 46,643 70,668 67,697 43,240 

Unrecognized tax benefits

 12,007 610 - - 11,397  11,619 798   10,821 
           

 $595,378 77,610 120,108 191,979 205,681 
            $567,131 79,581 124,191 191,752 171,607 
           

        Other possible long-term discretionary uses of cash could include capital expenditures for enhancement of technology infrastructure and home office expansion, strategic acquisitions, payment of dividends, income tax payments, seed money for new products, pension funding, repurchases of our common stock, and payment of upfront fund commissions for Class C shares and certain fee-based asset allocation products. We expect payment of upfront fund commissions for certain fee-based asset allocation products pension funding and repurchaseswill decline in future years due to a change in our advisor compensation plan whereby a smaller population of our common stock.advisors are eligible for upfront fund commissions on the sale of these products.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

        Other than operating leases, which are included in the table above, the Company does not have any off-balance sheet financing. The Company has not created, and is not party to, any special-purpose or off-balance sheet entities for the purpose of raising capital, incurring debt or operating its business.

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

        Management believes the following critical accounting policies affect its significant estimates and judgments used in the preparation of its consolidated financial statements.

Accounting for Goodwill and Intangible Assets

        As of December 31, 2013,2014, our total goodwill and intangible assets were $162.0$158.1 million, or 12%10%, of our total assets. Two significant considerations arise with respect to these assets that require management


Table of Contents

estimates and judgment: (i) the valuation in connection with the initial purchase price allocation, and (ii) the ongoing evaluation of impairment.


Table of Contents

        In connection with all of our acquisitions, an evaluation is completed to determine reasonable purchase price allocations. The purchase price allocation process requires management estimates and judgments as to expectations for the various products, distribution channels and business strategies. For example, certain growth rates and operating margins were assumed for different products and distribution channels. If actual growth rates or operating margins, among other assumptions, differ from the estimates and judgments used in the purchase price allocation, the amounts recorded in the financial statements for identifiable intangible assets and goodwill could be subject to charges for impairment in the future.

        We complete an ongoing review of the recoverability of goodwill and intangible assets using a fair-value or income based approach on an annual basis or more frequently whenever events occur or circumstances change that would more likely than not reduce the fair value of a reporting unit below its carrying amount. Intangible assets with indefinite lives, primarily acquired mutual fund advisory contracts, are also tested for impairment annually by comparing their fair value to the carrying amount of the asset. We consider mutual fund advisory contracts indefinite lived intangible assets as they are expected to be renewed without significant cost or modification of terms. Factors that are considered important in determining whether an impairment of goodwill or intangible assets might exist include significant continued underperformance compared to peers, the likelihood of termination or non-renewal of a mutual fund advisory or subadvisory contract or substantial changes in revenues earned from such contracts, significant changes in our business and products, material and ongoing negative industry or economic trends, or other factors specific to each asset or subsidiary being evaluated. Because of the significance of goodwill and other intangibles to our consolidated balance sheets, the annual impairment analysis is critical. Any changes in key assumptions about our business and our prospects, or changes in market conditions or other externalities, could result in an impairment charge.

        As of June 30, 2012, the Company's annual impairment test indicated that the fair value of the Legend reporting unit exceeded its carrying value, which resulted in no goodwill impairment. During preliminary due diligence conducted in the third quarter regarding a possible sale of Legend, several significant issues arose regarding executive leadership, advisor retention and employee morale. As due diligence discussions progressed into formal negotiations throughout the third quarter, the Company's concerns regarding these matters escalated, the depth and consequence of which led us to determine that a change in the strategic direction of Legend was necessary, and as a result, the Company decided to move forward with a sale of Legend at a price lower than the fair value utilized in the annual impairment analysis in the second quarter. During the third quarter of 2012, $59.2 million of goodwill related to Legend was allocated to assets of discontinued operations held for sale andsale. Additionally, $42.4 million of goodwill related to Legend was written down and is included in the loss from discontinued operations in the statement of income.income in 2012.

        In 2013,2014, the Company's annual impairment test completed during the second quarter indicated that goodwill and identifiable intangible assets were not impaired. Related to goodwill, the fair value of the investment management and related services reporting unit exceeded its carrying value by more than 100%.

        Our The fair value of indefinite life intangible asset balance includesassets excluding the MFC intangible also exceeded its carrying value by more than 100%. At that time, the fair value of the $16.3 million intangible (with an associated deferred tax liability of $6.0 million) related to our subadvisory agreement to manage certain mutual fund products for Mackenzie Financial Corporation recorded in connection with our purchase of Mackenzie Investment Management, Inc. in 2002. As part of purchase accounting, a deferred tax liability was established related to this identifiable intangible asset. As of December 31, 2013, the associated deferred tax liability is $6.1 million.

        The fair value of this intangible assetMFC exceeded its carrying amount by 20% when performing our annual testing for impairment during5%. This excess represented a decline compared to the second quarter.prior year due to a decline in the related assets under management attributed to a realignment of MFC's fund offerings and additional asset reductions.

        Based on the result of our annual test, we increased the frequency of our impairment analysis for the MFC intangible asset. During the third quarter of 2014, we recorded an impairment charge of $7.9 million related to this asset; there are no indicatorsintangible asset as a result of impairment asa further decline in the related assets under management and associated cash flows. We also reduced the associated deferred tax liability by $2.9 million. As of December 31, 2013.2014, the MFC intangible balance is $8.4 million with an associated deferred tax liability of $3.1 million. It is possible that the assets we manage for MFC may decrease in the future, which would require us to assess the need for an additional write-down of the intangible asset.

        Additionally during the third quarter of 2014, we recorded a $4.1 million intangible asset related to a fund adoption transaction agreement with Emerging Managers Group, L.P., which became effective in August 2014, through which Ivy Investment Management Company assumed responsibility as investment adviser and Ivy Funds Distributor, Inc. serves as distributor of the Selector Management Funds.


Table of Contents

Accounting for Income Taxes

        In the ordinary course of business, many transactions occur for which the ultimate tax outcome is uncertain. In addition, respective tax authorities periodically audit our income tax returns. These audits examine our significant tax filing positions, including the timing and amounts of deductions and the allocation of income among tax jurisdictions. We adjust our income tax provision in the period in which we determine the actual outcomes will likely be different from our estimates. The recognition or derecognition of income tax expense related to uncertain tax positions is determined under the guidance as prescribed by"Income Taxes Topic," Accounting Standards Codification ("ASC")"Income Taxes Topic" ASC 740. During 2014, 2013 and 2012, the Company settled six, four and three open tax years, respectively, that were undergoing audit by state jurisdictions in which the Company operates. These audits were settled in all material respects with no significant adjustments. The Company is currently undergoing audits in various other state jurisdictions that have not yet been settled.

   ��        We recognize an asset or liability for the deferred tax consequences of temporary differences between the tax basis of assets and liabilities and their reported amounts in the financial statements, including the determination of any valuation allowance that might be required for deferred tax assets. These temporary differences will result in taxable or deductible amounts in future years when the reported amounts of assets are recovered or liabilities are settled.

        During 2012,2013, the Company recorded a non-cash impairment charge for its investment in the Legend subsidiaries. The impairment created excess tax basis in our investment in Legend that was characterized asrealized a capital loss uponon the sale of Legend, in 2013. Capital losses generated by the Legend sale arewhich is available to offset potential future capital gains for the next five years, and anygains. Any unutilized capital loss carryforward will expire in 2018. Due to the character of the loss and the limited carryforward period permitted by law, the Company may not realize the full tax benefit of the capital loss. Management believes it is not more likely than not that the Company will generate sufficient future capital gains to realize the full benefit of these capital losses. Accordingly, a valuation allowance has been recorded on the deferred tax assets that were capital in nature as of December 31, 20132014 and 2012.2013.

        As of December 31, 2013,2014, two of the Company's subsidiaries have state net operating loss carryforwards in certain states in which those companies file taxes on a separate company basis. These entities have recognized a deferred tax asset for such carryforwards. The carryforwards, if not utilized, will expire between 20142015 and 2033.2034. Management believes it is not more likely than not that the subsidiaries will generate sufficient future taxable income in these states to realize the benefit of these net operating loss carryforwards and, accordingly, a valuation allowance has been recorded at December 31, 20132014 and 2012.2013.

        We have not recorded a valuation allowance on any other deferred tax assets as of the current reporting period based on our belief that operating income will, more likely than not, be sufficient to realize the benefit of these assets over time. In the event that actual results differ from estimates or if our historical trend of positive operating income changes, we may be required to record a valuation allowance on deferred tax assets, which could have a significant effect on our consolidated financial condition and results of operations.

        Income taxes are recorded at the rates in effect in the various tax jurisdictions in which we operate. Tax law and rate changes are reflected in the income tax provision in the period in which such changes are enacted.

Pension and Other Postretirement Benefits

        Accounting for our pension and postretirement benefit plans requires us to estimate the cost of benefits to be provided well into the future and the current value of our benefit obligations. Three critical assumptions affecting these estimates are the discount rate, the expected return on assets and the expected health care cost trend rate. The discount rate assumption was based on the Aon Hewitt AA Only Above Median Yield Curve. This discount rate was determined separately for each plan by plotting the expected


Table of Contents

benefit payments from each plan against a yield curve of high quality, zero coupon bonds and calculating the single rate that would produce the same present value of liabilities as the yield curve. The expected


Table of Contents

return on plan assets and health care cost trend rates are based upon an evaluation of our historical trends and experience, taking into account current and expected future market conditions. Other assumptions include rates of future compensation increases, participant withdrawals and mortality rates, and participant retirement ages. These estimates and assumptions impact the amount of net pension expense or income recognized each year and the measurement of our reported benefit obligation under the plans.

        In 2013,2014, we utilized a discount rate of 4.97%4.13% for our pension plan compared to 4.97% in 2013 and 4.22% in 2012 and 4.99% in 2011 to reflect market rates. The discount rate for our postretirement medical plan was 4.94%4.07%, 4.94% and 4.18% in 2014, 2013 and 5.00% in 2013, 2012 and 2011 respectively. We continue to assume long-term asset returns of 7.75% on the assets in our pension plan, the same as our assumption in 20122013 and 2011.2012. Our pension plan assets at December 31, 20132014 were 100% invested in the Asset Strategy style and we have targeted this same investment strategy going forward.

        The effect of hypothetical changes to selected assumptions on the Company's retirement benefit plans would be as follows:

 
  
 As of
December 31,
2013 2014
 For the year
ended
December 31,
20142015
Assumptions
 Change
 Increase
(Decrease)
PBO/APBO (1)

 Increase
(Decrease)
Expense (2)

     
 
  
 (in thousands)

Pension

        

Discount rate

 +/-50–50 bps $(9,796)(12,325)/10,76013,634 $(1,278)(1,497)/1,3091,641

Expected return on assets

 +/-100–100 bps  N/A  (1,762)(1,814)/1,7621,814

Salary scale

 +/-100–100 bps  7,616/(7,056)8,681/(7,873)  1,868/(1,746)2,121/(1,889)

Other Postretirement

        

Discount rate

 +/-50–50 bps  (458)(574)/499626  (75)(46)/5749

Health care cost trend rate

 +/-100–100 bps  955/(825)1,192/(1,027)  185/(211)205/(203)

(1)
Projected benefit obligation ("PBO") for pension plans and accumulated postretirement benefit obligation ("APBO") for other postretirement plans.

(2)
Pre-tax impact on expense.

Deferred Sales Commissions

        We pay upfront sales commissions to our financial advisors and third party intermediary broker/dealers in connection with the sale of certain classes of mutual fund shares sold without a front-end sales charge. These costs are capitalized and amortized over the period during which the shareholder is subject to a CDSC, not to exceed five years. We recover these costs through Rule 12b-1 and other distribution plan fees, which are paid by the applicable share classes of the Advisors Funds, Ivy Funds and InvestEd, along with CDSCs paid by shareholders who redeem their shares prior to completion of the specified holding periods. Should we lose our ability to recover such sales commissions through distribution plan payments and CDSCs, the value of these assets would immediately decline, as would future cash flows. We periodically review the recoverability of deferred sales commission assets as events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of deferred sales commission assets may not be recoverable and adjust the deferred assets accordingly.


Table of Contents

Valuation of Investments

        We record substantially all investments in our financial statements at fair value. Where available, we use prices from independent sources such as listed market prices or broker/dealer price quotations. We evaluate our investments for other than temporary declines in value on a periodic basis. This may exist when the fair value of an investment security has been below the current value for an extended period of time. As most of our investments are carried at fair value, if an other than temporary decline in value is determined to exist, the unrealized investment loss recorded net of tax in accumulated other comprehensive income is realized as a charge to net income, in the period in which the other than temporary decline in value is determined. While we believe that we have accurately estimated the amount of the other than temporary decline in the value of our portfolio, different assumptions could result in changes to the recorded amounts in our financial statements.

Loss Contingencies

        The likelihood that a loss contingency exists is evaluated using the criteria of"Contingencies Topic," ASC 450 through consultation with legal counsel. A loss contingency is recorded if the contingency is considered probable and reasonably estimable as of the date of the financial statements.

Seasonality and Inflation

        We do not believe our operations are subject to significant seasonal fluctuation. We have historically experienced increased sales activity in the first and fourth quarters of the year due to funding of retirement accounts by our clients. The Company has not suffered material adverse effects from inflation in the past. However, a substantial increase in the inflation rate in the future may adversely affect customers' purchasing decisions, may increase the costs of borrowing, or may have an impact on the Company's margins and overall cost structure.

ITEM 7A.    Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

        We use various financial instruments with certain inherent market risks, primarily related to interest rates and securities prices. The principal risks of loss arising from adverse changes in market rates and prices to which we are exposed relate to interest rates on debt and marketable securities. Generally, these instruments have not been entered into for trading purposes. Management actively monitors these risk exposures; however, fluctuations could impact our results of operations and financial position. As a matter of policy, we only execute derivative transactions to manage exposures arising in the normal course of business and not for speculative or trading purposes. The following information, together with information included in other parts of Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, which are incorporated herein by reference, describe the key aspects of certain financial instruments that have market risk to us.

Interest Rate Sensitivity

        Our interest sensitive liabilities include our long-term fixed rate senior notes and obligations for any balances outstanding under our credit facility or other short-term borrowings. Increases in market interest rates would generally cause a decrease in the fair value of the senior notes and an increase in interest expense associated with short-term borrowings and borrowings under the credit facility. Decreases in market interest rates would generally cause an increase in the fair value of the senior notes and a decrease in interest expense associated with short-term borrowings and borrowings under the credit facility. We had no short-term borrowings outstanding as of December 31, 2013.2014.

Available for Sale InvestmentsInvestment Securities Sensitivity

        We maintain an investment portfolio of various holdings, types and maturities. Our portfolio is diversified and consists primarily of investment grade debt securitiesaffiliated funds (mutual funds and equity mutual funds.UCITS sub-funds). A portion of investments are classified as available for sale investments. At any time, a sharp increase in interest rates or


Table of Contents

a sharp decline in the United States stock market could have a significant negative impact on the fair value of our investment portfolio. If a decline in fair value is determined to be other than temporary by management, the cost basis of the individual security or mutual fund is written down to fair value. We dodid not currently hedge these exposures.exposures in 2014. However, we intend to establish a hedging program in 2015 that uses derivative instruments to hedge our exposure to fluctuations in the value of our investment portfolio. Conversely, declines in interest rates or a sizeable rise in the United States stock market could have a significant positive impact on our investment portfolio. However, unrealized gains are not recognized in operations on available for sale securities until they are sold.

        The following is a summary of the effect that a 10% increase or decrease in equity or fixed income prices would have on our investment portfolio subject to equity or fixed income price fluctuations at December 31, 2014:

Investment Securities
 Fair Value
 Fair Value
Assuming a 10%
Increase

 Fair Value
Assuming a 10%
Decrease

 
      
 
  
 (in thousands)
  
 

Available for sale:

          

Affiliated funds

 $161,270  177,397  145,143 

Trading:

  
 
  
 
  
 
 

Affiliated funds

  81,913  90,104  73,722 

Equity securities

  72  79  65 

Asset-backed securities

  28  31  25 

Total

 $243,283  267,611  218,955 

Securities Price Sensitivity

        Our revenues are dependent on the underlying assets under management in the Funds to which investment advisory services are provided. The Funds include portfolios of investments comprised of various combinations of equity, fixed income and other types of securities and commodities. Fluctuations in the value of these securities are common and are generated by numerous factors, including, without limitation, market volatility, the overall economy, inflation, changes in investor strategies, availability of alternative investment vehicles, government regulations and others. Accordingly, declines in any one or a combination of these factors, or other factors not separately identified, may reduce the value of investment securities and, in turn, the underlying assets under management on which our revenues are earned. These declines have an impact in our investment sales and our trading portfolio, thereby compounding the impact on our earnings.

ITEM 8.    Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

        Reference is made to the Consolidated Financial Statements referred to in the Index on page 4951 setting forth our consolidated financial statements, together with the report of KPMG LLP dated February 27, 201426, 2015 on page 50.52.

ITEM 9.    Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure

        None.

ITEM 9A.    Controls and Procedures

(a)
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures.    The Company maintains a system of disclosure controls and procedures that is designed to provide reasonable assuranceensure that information which is required to be timely disclosed by the Company in the reports that it files or submits under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act") is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods

Table of Contents

(b)
Management's Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting.    Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting, as such term is defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f). Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our principal executive officer and our principal financial officer, we conducted an evaluationevaluated of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2014 based on the framework in"Internal Control-Integrated Framework (1992)(2013)" issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. All internal control systems, no matter how

Table of Contents