Use these links to rapidly review the document
TABLE OF CONTENTS1
TABLE OF CONTENTS2

Table of Contents

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549



FORM 10-K

ý    Annual report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 20142015

OR

o    Transition report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

Commission file number 001-13913

WADDELL & REED FINANCIAL, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Delaware
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
 51-0261715
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)

6300 Lamar Avenue
Overland Park, Kansas 66202
913-236-2000
(Address, including zip code, and telephone number of Registrant's principal executive offices)



SECURITIES REGISTERED PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(b) OF THE ACT

Title of each class Name of each exchange on which registered
Class A Common Stock, $.01 par value New York Stock Exchange



SECURITIES REGISTERED PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(g) OF THE ACT:

None
(Title of class)

        Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.    YES ý    NO o

        Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act.    YES o    NO ý.

        Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    Yes ý    No o.

        Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).    Yes ý    No o.

        Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendments to this Form 10-K.    o

        Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).

Large accelerated Filer ý Accelerated Filer o
Non-accelerated Filer o Smaller Reporting Company o
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)

        Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined by Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).    Yes o    No ý.

        The aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common stock equity held by non-affiliates based on the closing sale price on June 30, 20142015 was $5.13$3.82 billion.

        Shares outstanding of each of the registrant's classes of common stock as of February 13, 201512, 2016 Class A common stock, $.01 par value: 83,564,55681,758,013.

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

        In PartParts II and III of this Form 10-K, portions of the definitive proxy statement for the 20152016 Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held April 15, 2015.13, 2016.

   


Index of Exhibits (Pages 8990 through 93)94)
Total Number of Pages Included Are 9394


Table of Contents

WADDELL & REED FINANCIAL, INC.
INDEX TO ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 20142015

 
  
 Page 

Part I

 

 

    

Item 1.

 

Business

  3 

Item 1A.

 

Risk Factors

  11 

Item 1B.

 

Unresolved Staff Comments

  18 

Item 2.

 

Properties

  18 

Item 3.

 

Legal Proceedings

  18 

Item 4.

 

Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security HoldersMine Safety Disclosures

  1819 

Part II

 

 

  
 
 

Item 5.

 

Market for Registrant's Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

  1920 

Item 6.

 

Selected Financial Data

  2223 

Item 7.

 

Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

  2324 

Item 7A.

 

Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

  4446 

Item 8.

 

Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

  4547 

Item 9.

 

Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure

  4547 

Item 9A.

 

Controls and Procedures

  4547 

Item 9B.

 

Other Information

  4850 

Part III

 

 

  
 
 

Item 10.

 

Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance

  4850 

Item 11.

 

Executive Compensation

  4850 

Item 12.

 

Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters

  4850 

Item 13.

 

Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence

  4950 

Item 14.

 

Principal Accounting Fees and Services

  4950 

Part IV

 

 

  
 
 

Item 15.

 

Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules

  4950 


SIGNATURES


 

 

5051

 

INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

  5152 

INDEX TO EXHIBITS

  8990 

Table of Contents


PART I

Forward-Looking Statements

This Annual Report on Form 10-K and the letter to stockholders contains "forward-looking statements" within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, which reflect the current views and assumptions of management with respect to future events regarding our business and the industry in general. These forward-looking statements include all statements, other than statements of historical fact, regarding our financial position, business strategy and other plans and objectives for future operations, including statements with respect to revenues and earnings, the amount and composition of assets under management, distribution sources, expense levels, redemption rates and the financial markets and other conditions. These statements are generally identified by the use of words such as "may," "could," "should," "would," "believe," "anticipate," "forecast," "estimate," "expect," "intend," "plan," "project," "outlook," "will," "potential" and similar statements of a future or forward-looking nature. Readers are cautioned that any forward-looking information provided by or on behalf of the Company is not a guarantee of future performance. Certain important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from our expectations are disclosed in the Item 1 "Business" and Item 1A "Risk Factors" sections of this Annual Report on Form 10-K, which include, without limitation, the adverse effect from a decline in securities markets or in the relative investment performance of our products, our inability to pay future dividends, the loss of existing distribution channels or the inability to access new ones, a reduction of the assets we manage on short notice, and adverse results of litigation and/or arbitration. The forgoing factors should not be construed as exhaustive and should be read together with other cautionary statements included in this and other reports and filings we make with the SEC. All forward-looking statements speak only as of the date on which they are made and we undertake no duty to update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.

ITEM 1.    Business

General

        Waddell & Reed Financial, Inc. (hereinafter referred to as the "Company," "we," "our" or "us") is a corporation, incorporated in the state of Delaware in 1981, that conducts business through its subsidiaries. Founded in 1937, we are one of the oldest mutual fund complexes in the United States, having introduced the Waddell & Reed Advisors group of mutual funds (the "Advisors Funds") in 1940. Over time we added additional mutual fund families: Ivy Funds (the "Ivy Funds"), Ivy Funds Variable Insurance Portfolios ("Ivy Funds VIP"), InvestEd Portfolios, our 529 college savings plan ("InvestEd") (collectively, the Advisors Funds, Ivy Funds, Ivy Funds VIP and InvestEd are referred to as the "Funds") and the Selector ManagementIvy Global Investors Fund SICAV (the "SICAV") and its Ivy Global Investors sub-funds (the "IGI Funds"), an undertaking for the collective investment in transferable securities (the "Selector Management Funds" or "UCITS"("UCITS"). As of December 31, 2014,2015, we had $123.7$104.4 billion in assets under management.

        We derive our revenues from providing investment management, investment advisory, investment product underwriting and distribution, and shareholder services administration to the Funds, and the Selector ManagementIGI Funds and institutional and separately managed accounts. Investment management fees are based on the amount of average assets under management and are affected by sales levels, financial market conditions, redemptions and the composition of assets. Our underwriting and distribution revenues consist of Rule 12b-1 asset-based service and distribution fees, fees earned on fee-based asset allocation products and related advisory services, commissions derived from sales of investment and insurance products, and distribution fees on certain variable products. The products sold have various commission structures and the revenues received from those sales vary based on the type and dollar amount sold. Shareholder service fee revenue includes transfer agency fees, custodian fees from retirement plan accounts, and portfolio accounting and administration fees, and is earned based on assets under management or number of client accounts.


Table of Contents

        We operate our business through a balanced distribution network. Our retail products are distributed through third parties such as other broker/dealers, registered investment advisors and various retirement platforms (collectively, the "Wholesale channel") or through our sales force of independent financial advisors (the "Advisors channel"). We also market our investment advisory services to institutional investors, either directly or through consultants (the "Institutional channel").

        Our Wholesale channel efforts include retail fund distribution through broker/dealers (the primary method of distributing mutual funds for the industry), registered investment advisors (fee-based financial advisors who generally sell mutual funds through financial supermarkets) and retirement and insurance platforms. Assets under management in this channel were $60.3$45.6 billion at the end of 2014.2015.

        In the Advisors channel, our sales force focuses its efforts primarily on financial planning, serving mostly middle class and mass affluent clients. We compete with smaller broker/dealers and independent financial advisors, as well as a span of other financial service providers. Assets under management in this channel were $45.5$43.4 billion at December 31, 2014.2015.

        Through our Institutional channel, we serve as subadvisor for domestic and foreign distributors of investment products for pension funds, Taft-Hartley plans and endowments. Additionally, we serve as investment advisor and distributor of the Selector ManagementIGI Funds. Assets under management in the Institutional channel were $17.8$15.4 billion at December 31, 2014.2015.

Organization

        We operate our investment advisory business through our subsidiary companies, primarily Waddell & Reed Investment Management Company ("WRIMCO"), a registered investment adviser for the Advisor


Table of Contents

Advisors Funds, the Ivy Funds VIP and InvestEd, and Ivy Investment Management Company ("IICO"), the registered investment adviser for the Ivy Funds and the Selector ManagementIGI Funds and global distributor of the IGI Funds.

        Our underwriting and distribution business operates through two broker/dealers: Waddell & Reed, Inc. ("W&R") and Ivy Funds Distributor, Inc. ("IFDI"). W&R is a registered broker/dealer and investment adviser that acts primarily as the national distributor and underwriter for shares of the Advisors Funds, Ivy Funds VIP, InvestEd and other mutual funds, and as a distributor of variable annuities and other insurance products issued by our business partners. In addition, W&R is the seventhsixth largest distributor of the Ivy Funds. IFDI is the distributor and underwriter for the Ivy Funds and serves as the global distributor of the Selector Management Funds.

        In 2012, the Company signed a definitive agreement to sell its Legend group of subsidiaries ("Legend") and the sale closed effective January 1, 2013. Legend was our mutual fund distribution and retirement planning subsidiary based in Palm Beach Gardens, Florida. Through its network of financial advisors, Legend primarily served employees of school districts and other not-for-profit organizations. Legend Advisory Corporation, the registered investment adviser for Legend, and Legend Equities Corporation, a registered broker/dealer ("LEC"), were among the subsidiaries sold.

        Waddell & Reed Services Company ("WRSCO") provides transfer agency and accounting services to the Funds. W&R, WRIMCO, WRSCO, IICO and IFDI are hereafter collectively referred to as the "Company," "we," "us" or "our" unless the context requires otherwise.

Investment Management Operations

        Our investment advisory business provides one of our largest sources of revenues. We earn investment management fee revenues by providing investment advisory and management services pursuant to investment management agreements with the Funds and the Selector Management Funds. While the specific terms of the agreements vary, the basic terms are similar. The agreements provide that we render overall investment management services to each of the Funds, subject to the oversight of each Fund's board of trustees and in accordance with each Fund's investment objectives and policies. The agreements permit us to enter into separate agreements for shareholder services or accounting services with each respective Fund.

        Each Fund's board of trustees, including a majority of the trustees who are not "interested persons" of the Fund or the Company within the meaning of the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the "ICA") ("disinterested members") and the Fund's shareholders must approve the investment management agreement between the respective Fund and the Company. These agreements may continue in effect from year to year if specifically approved at least annually by (i) the Fund's board, including a majority of the disinterested members, or (ii) the vote of a majority of both the shareholders of the Fund and the disinterested members of each Fund's board, each vote being cast in person at a meeting called for such


Table of Contents

purpose. Each agreement automatically terminates in the event of its assignment, as defined by the ICA or the Investment Advisers Act of 1940, as amended (the "Advisers Act"), and may be terminated without penalty by any Fund by giving us 60 days' written notice if the termination has been approved by a majority of the Fund's trustees or the Fund's shareholders. We may terminate an investment management agreement without penalty on 120 days' written notice.

        In addition to performing investment management services for the Funds, we act as an investment adviser for the IGI Funds, institutional and other private investors and we provide subadvisory services to other investment companies. Such services are provided pursuant to various written agreements and our fees are generally based on a percentage of assets under management.


Table of Contents

        Our investment management team begins each business day in a collaborative discussion that fosters idea sharing, yet reinforces individual accountability. Through all market cycles, we remain dedicated to the following investment principles:

        These three principles shape our investment philosophy and money management approach. For nearly 80 years, our investment organization has delivered consistently competitive investment performance. Through bull and bear markets, our investment professionals have not strayed from what works—fundamental research and a time-tested investment process. We believe investors turn to us because they appreciate that our investment approach continues to identify and create opportunities for wealth creation.

        Our investment management team comprises 8788 professionals, including 3334 portfolio managers who average 2223 years of industry experience and 16 years of tenure with our firm. We have significant experience in virtually all major asset classes, several specialized asset classes and a range of investment styles. At December 31, 2014, over2015, 80% of the Company's $123.7$104.4 billion in assets under management were invested in equities, of which 80%81% was domestic and 20%19% was international. In recent years, we have supported growth of international investments by adding investment professionals native to countries that we consider emerging markets. They, along with other members of the investment team, focus on understanding foreign markets and capturing investment opportunities. Our investment management team also includes subadvisors who bring similar investment philosophies and additional expertise in specific asset classes.

Investment Management Products

        Our mutual fund families offer a wide variety of investment options. We are the exclusive underwriter and distributor of 8689 registered open-end mutual fund portfolios in the Funds.Funds, which includes 17 investment styles. Additionally, we have one closed-end offering through the Ivy Funds and offer the Selector ManagementIGI Funds through our Institutional channel. The Advisors Funds, variable products offering the Ivy Funds VIP, and InvestEd are offered primarily through our financial advisors in the Advisors channel; in some circumstances, certain of those funds are also offered through the Wholesale channel. The Ivy Funds are offered through both our Wholesale channel and Advisors channel. The Funds' assets under management are included in either our Wholesale channel or our Advisors channel depending on which channel marketed the client account or is the broker of record.

        During 2014, we completed the merger of two open-end mutual funds and added two open-end mutual funds to our product line. Ivy Funds merged the Ivy Asset Strategy Opportunities Fund into the Ivy Emerging Markets Equity Fund, creating a fund that offers investors a single fund for emerging-market equity investments in any region of the world. We launched the Ivy Emerging Markets Local Currency Debt Fund, subadvised by Pictet Asset Management. This fund provides investors the opportunity to capture fixed income opportunities from a select group of emerging market economies. The fund invests primarily in sovereign debt securities issued in the local currencies of emerging market countries. We also launched the Ivy Mid Cap Income Opportunities Fund. This fund's objective is to provide total return through a combination of current income and capital appreciation by investing primarily in a diversified portfolio of income-producing common stocks that the management team believes demonstrates favorable


Table of Contents

prospects for        During 2015, we launched two income-oriented mutual funds in partnership with Apollo Credit Management. The Ivy Apollo Strategic Income fund invests among three investment strategies: Apollo's total return.return and Ivy's global bond and high income. The Ivy Apollo Multi-Asset Income fund intends to focus primarily on mid-capitalization companies believed to have the ability to sustaininvests among four investment strategies: Apollo's total return and potentially increase dividends while providing capital appreciation over the long-term.

Ivy's high income, global equity income and global real estate, which is subadvised by LaSalle Investment Management Securities. We also completed a fund adoption transaction agreement in 2014 with Emerging Managers Group, L.P. through which IICO assumed responsibility as investment adviser and IFDI serves as global distributorlaunched three new sub-funds of the Selector Management Funds.SICAV in 2015. The Selector Management Funds included in the fund adoption transaction are the Ivy Global Investors Asset Strategy FundBalanced fund seeks to provide total return by investing primarily in a balanced mix of equities of medium to large U.S. companies, debt or preferred securities and theshort-term instruments, typically within moderate asset allocation ranges. The Ivy Global Investors High Income Fund. SubsequentEmerging Markets Equity fund will primarily invest in equity securities of companies from countries considered to be in emerging markets or those that are economically linked to emerging markets. The Ivy Global Investors Energy fund will primarily invest in the fund adoption transactionequity of companies around the world that are within the energy sector or that develop products and services to enhance energy efficiency. In January of 2016, we launched the following sub-funds: Ivy Global Investors Mid Cap Growth Fund, Ivy Global Investors Large Cap Growth Fund and Ivy Global Investors Science & Technology Fund.Targeted Return Bond fund, subadvised by Pictet Asset Management. This transaction allows usfund seeks to serveprovide a positive total return over the non-U.S. resident customerlong-term across all market through national broker/dealer firmsenvironments by investing in any form of debt security issued in the United States and establish greater international distributionU.S or internationally.

        During 2015, we also entered into a preliminary agreement with Navigate Fund Solutions, a subsidiary of our investment management capabilities.

        In 2014, we launchedEaton Vance Corporation, to support the R6 share class for the majority of thelaunch by Ivy Funds of a family of NextShares exchange-traded managed funds ("ETMFs"). The Ivy Funds launch of NextShares ETMFs is subject to meetsecuring exemptive order relief from the needsSEC to allow it to manage exchange-traded managed funds, as well as the development of our retirementimplementation technology by broker/dealers and benefit plan clients. The share class does not charge any sales load or Rule 12b-1 expenses.other market participants.

Other Products

        We offer our Advisors channel customers fee-based asset allocation investment advisory products, including Managed Allocation Portfolio ("MAP"), MAPPlus and Strategic Portfolio Allocation ("SPA"), which utilize the Funds. As of December 31, 2014,2015, clients had $17.3$17.6 billion invested in our fee-based asset allocation investment advisory products, of which $15.7 billion is invested in our mutual funds and included in our mutual fund assets under management.

        In our Advisors channel, we distribute various business partners' variable annuity products, which offer the Ivy Funds VIP as an investment vehicle. We also offer our Advisors channel customers retirement and life insurance products underwritten by our business partners. Through our insurance agency subsidiary, our financial advisors also sell life insurance and disability products underwritten by various carriers.

Distribution Channels

        We distribute our investment products through the Wholesale, Advisors and Institutional channels. During 2014, our Asset Strategy funds continued to play a lead role in the Company's results, comprising 25% of the Company's gross sales and 29% of the assets under management as of December 31, 2014. While we recognize the past success of these funds, we are also aware of the concentration risks to our revenue streams created by the size of these funds, despite the flexible mandate. Over the past several years, our distribution channels have successfully marketed additional products to their clients, which contributed to total sales for the Asset Strategy funds decreasing from 46% in 2010 to 25% in 2014. Over the same time period, fixed income sales have grown from 13% to 26%. We plan to continue to stress diversification of sales in 2015.

Wholesale Channel

        Our Wholesale channel generates sales through various third party distribution outlets. Our assets under management in the Wholesale channel were $60.3$45.6 billion at December 31, 2014, including $0.6 billion in assets subadvised by other managers.2015.

        Our team of 5961 external wholesalers lead our wholesaling efforts, which focus principally on distributing the Ivy Funds through three segments: broker/dealers (the largest method of distributing mutual funds for the industry and for us), retirement platforms (401(k) platforms using multiple managers) and registered investment advisors (fee-based financial advisors who generally sell mutual funds through financial supermarkets). Additionally, our National Accounts team, comprised of 1819 employees, work with the home offices of our distribution partners managing current and new relationships.


Table of Contents

Advisors Channel

        Assets under management in the Advisors channel were $45.5$43.4 billion at December 31, 2014.2015. Throughout our history, our advisors have sold investment products primarily to middle income and mass


Table of Contents

affluent individuals, families and businesses across the country in geographic markets of all sizes. We assist clients on a wide range of financial issues with a significant focus on helping them plan, generally, for long-term investments such as retirement and education, and offer one-on-one consultations that emphasize long-term relationships through continued service. As a result of this approach, this channel has developed a loyal customer base with clients maintaining their accounts significantly longer than the industry average. Over the past several years, we have expanded our brokerage platform technology and offerings, and continue to do so which enable us to competitively recruit experienced advisors.

        As of December 31, 2014,2015, our sales force consisted of 1,7661,819 financial advisors who operate out of offices located throughout the United States. We believe, based on industry data, that our financial advisors are currently one of the largest sales forces in the United States selling primarily mutual funds, and that W&R, our broker/dealer subsidiary, ranks among the largest independent broker/dealers. We continue to experience growth in sales force production. Advisors channel underwriting and distribution fee revenues per the average number of advisors were $265 thousand, $254 thousand $215 thousand and $180$215 thousand for the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 2013 and 2012,2013, respectively. As of December 31, 2014,2015, our Advisors channel had approximately 465449 thousand mutual fund customers.

Institutional Channel

        Through this channel, we manage assets in a variety of investment styles for a variety of institutions. The largest client type is other asset managers that hire us to act as subadvisor; they are typically domestic and foreign distributors of investment products who lack scale or the track record to manage internally, or choose to market multi-manager styles. Over time, the Institutional channel has been successful in developing subadvisory relationships, and as of December 31, 2014,2015, subadvisory business comprised more than 70% of the Institutional channel's assets. Our diverse client list also includes the Selector ManagementIGI Funds, pension funds, Taft-Hartley plans and endowments. Assets under management in the Institutional channel were $17.8$15.4 billion at December 31, 2014.2015.

Service Agreements

        We earn service fee revenues by providing various services to the Funds and their shareholders. Pursuant to shareholder servicing agreements, we perform shareholder servicing functions for which the Funds pay us a monthly fee, including: maintaining shareholder accounts; issuing, transferring and redeeming shares; distributing dividends and paying redemptions; furnishing information related to the Funds; and handling shareholder inquiries. Pursuant to accounting service agreements, we provide the Funds with bookkeeping and accounting services and assistance for which the Funds pay us a monthly fee, including: maintaining the Funds' records; pricing Fund shares; and preparing prospectuses for existing shareholders, proxy statements and certain other shareholder reports.

        Agreements with the Funds may be adopted or amended with the approval of the disinterested members of each Fund's board of trustees and have annually renewable terms of one year.

Competition

        The financial services industry is a highly competitive global industry. According to the Investment Company Institute or ICI,(the "ICI"), at the end of 20142015 there were more than 9,2009,500 open-end investment companies and more than 500 closed-end investment companies of varying sizes, investment policies and objectives whose shares are being offered to the public in the United States alone. Factors affecting our business include brand recognition, business reputation, investment performance, quality of service and the continuity of both client relationships and assets under management. A majority of mutual fund sales go to funds that are highly rated by a small number of well-known ranking services that focus on investment


Table of Contents

performance. Competition is based on distribution methods, the type and quality of shareholder services, the success of marketing efforts, the ability to develop investment products for certain market segments to meet the changing needs of investors, and the achievement of competitive investment management performance.


Table of Contents

        We compete with hundreds of other mutual fund management, distribution and service companies that distribute their fund shares through a variety of methods, including affiliated and unaffiliated sales forces, broker/dealers and direct sales to the public of shares offered at a low or no sales charge. Many larger mutual fund complexes have significant advertising budgets and established relationships with brokerage houses with large distribution networks, which enable these fund complexes to reach broad client bases. Many investment management firms offer services and products similar to ours, as well as other independent financial advisors. We also compete with brokerage and investment banking firms, insurance companies, commercial banks and other financial institutions and businesses offering other financial products in all aspects of their businesses. Although no single company or group of companies consistently dominates the mutual fund management and services industry, many are larger than us, have greater resources and offer a wider array of financial services and products. Barriers to entry into the investment management business are relatively few, and thus, we face a potentially growing number of competitors, especially during periods of strong financial and economic markets.

        The distribution of mutual funds and other investment products has undergone significant developments in recent years, which has intensified the competitive environment in which we operate. These developments include the introduction of new products, increasingly complex distribution systems with multiple classes of shares, the development of internet websites providing investors with the ability to invest on-line, the introduction of sophisticated technological platforms used by financial advisors to sell and service mutual funds for their clients, the introduction of separately managed accounts—previously available only to institutional investors—to individuals, and growth in the number of mutual funds offered.

        We believe we effectively compete across multiple dimensions of the asset management and broker/dealer businesses. First, we market our products, primarily the Ivy Funds family, to unaffiliated broker/dealers and advisors and compete against other asset managers offering mutual fund products. This distribution method allows us to move beyond proprietary distribution and increases our potential pool of clients. Competition is based on sales techniques, personal relationships and skills, and the quality of financial planning products and services offered. We compete against asset managers that are both larger and smaller than our firm, but we believe that the breadth and depth of our products position us to compete in this environment. Second, our proprietary broker/dealer consists of a sales force of independent contractors affiliated with our Company who have access to our proprietary financial products. We believe our business model targets customers seeking personal assistance from financial advisors or planners where the primary competition is companies distributing products through financial advisors. The market for financial advice is extremely broad and fragmented. Our financial advisors compete primarily with large and small broker/dealers, independent financial advisors, registered investment advisors, financial institutions and insurance representatives. Finally, we compete in the institutional marketplace, working with consultants who select asset managers for various opportunities, as well as working directly with plan sponsors, foundations, endowments, sovereign funds and other asset managers who hire subadvisors. In this marketplace, we compete with a broad range of asset managers.

        We also face competition in attracting and retaining qualified financial advisors and employees. To maximize our ability to compete effectively in our business, we offer competitive compensation.

Regulation

        The securities industry is subject to extensive regulation and virtually all aspects of our business are subject to various federal and state laws and regulations. These laws and regulations are primarily intended to protect investment advisory clients and shareholders of registered investment companies. Under such laws and regulations, agencies and organizations that regulate investment advisers, broker/dealers, and


Table of Contents

transfer agents like us have broad administrative powers, including the power to limit, restrict or prohibit an investment adviser, broker/dealer or transfer agent from carrying on its business in the event that it fails to comply with applicable laws and regulations. In such event, the possible sanctions that may be imposed include, but are not limited to, the suspension of individual employees or agents, limitations on engaging in


Table of Contents

certain lines of business for specified periods of time, censures, fines and the revocation of investment adviser and other registrations.

        The United States Securities and Exchange Commission (the "SEC") is the federal agency responsible for the administration of federal securities laws. Certain of our subsidiaries are registered with the SEC as investment advisers under the Advisers Act, which imposes numerous obligations on registered investment advisers including, among other things, fiduciary duties, record-keeping and reporting requirements, operational requirements and disclosure obligations, as well as general anti-fraud prohibitions. Investment advisers are subject to periodic examination by the SEC, and the SEC is authorized to institute proceedings and impose sanctions for violations of the Advisers Act, ranging from censure to termination of an investment adviser's registration.

        Our Funds are registered as investment companies with the SEC under the ICA, and various filings are made with states under applicable state rules and regulations. The ICA regulates the relationship between a mutual fund and its investment adviser and prohibits or severely restricts principal transactions and joint transactions. Various regulations cover certain investment strategies that may be used by the Funds for hedging and/or speculative purposes. To the extent the Funds purchase futures contracts, options on futures contracts, swaps and foreign currency contracts, they are subject to the commodities and futures regulations of the Commodity Futures Trading Commission.

        We derive a large portion of our revenues from investment management agreements. Under the Advisers Act, our investment management agreements terminate automatically if assigned without the client's consent. Under the ICA, investment advisory agreements with registered investment companies, such as the Funds, terminate automatically upon assignment. The term "assignment" is broadly defined and includes direct assignments, as well as assignments that may be deemed to occur, under certain circumstances, upon the transfer, directly or indirectly, of a controlling interest in the Company.

        The Company is also subject to federal and state laws affecting corporate governance, including the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, as well as rules adopted by the SEC. Our report on internal controls over financial reporting for 20142015 is included in Part I, Item 9A.

        As a publicly traded company, we are also subject to the rules of the New York Stock Exchange (the "NYSE"), the exchange on which our stock is listed, including the corporate governance listing standards approved by the SEC.

        Two of our subsidiaries, W&R and IFDI, are registered as broker/dealers with the SEC and the states. A third broker/dealer subsidiary, LEC, was sold effective January 1, 2013. Much of the broker/dealer regulation has been delegated by the SEC to self-regulatory organizations, principally the Municipal Securities Rulemaking Board and the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, Inc. ("FINRA"), which is the primary regulator of our broker/dealer activities. These self-regulatory organizations adopt rules (subject to approval by the SEC) that govern the industry and conduct periodic examinations of our operations over which they have jurisdiction. Securities firms are also subject to regulation by state securities administrators in those states in which they conduct business. Broker/dealers are subject to regulations that cover all aspects of the securities business, including sales practices, market making and trading among broker/dealers, the use and safekeeping of clients' funds and securities, capital structure, record-keeping, and the conduct of directors, officers and employees. Violation of applicable regulations can result in the revocation of broker/dealer licenses, the imposition of censures or fines, and the suspension or expulsion of a firm, its officers or employees.


Table of Contents

        W&R and IFDI are each subject to certain net capital requirements pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act"). Uniform Net Capital Rule 15c3-1 of the Exchange Act (the "Net Capital Rule") specifies the minimum level of net capital a registered broker/dealer must maintain and also requires that part of its assets be kept in a relatively liquid form. The Net Capital Rule is designed to ensure the financial soundness and liquidity of broker/dealers. Any failure to maintain the required minimum net capital may subject us to suspension or revocation of our registration


Table of Contents

or other limitations on our activity by the SEC, and suspension or expulsion by FINRA or other regulatory bodies, and ultimately could require the broker/dealer's liquidation. The maintenance of minimum net capital requirements may also limit our ability to pay dividends. As of December 31, 20142015 and 2013,2014, net capital for W&R and IFDI exceeded all minimum requirements.

        Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Investor Protection Act of 1970, W&R is a member of the Securities Investor Protection Corporation (the "SIPC"). IFDI is exempt from the membership requirements and is not a member of the SIPC. The SIPC provides protection against lost, stolen or missing securities (but not loss in value due to a rise or fall in market prices) for clients in the event of the failure of a broker/dealer. Accounts are protected up to $500,000 per client with a limit of $100,000 for cash balances. However, since the Funds, and not our broker/dealer subsidiaries, maintain customer accounts, SIPC protection would not cover mutual fund shareholders whose accounts are maintained directly with the Funds, but would apply to brokerage accounts held on our brokerage platform.

        Title III of the USA PATRIOT Act, the International Money Laundering Abatement and Anti-Terrorist Financing Act of 2001, imposes significant anti-money laundering requirements on all financial institutions, including domestic banks and domestic operations of foreign banks, broker/dealers, futures commission merchants and investment companies.

        Our operations outside the United States are subject to the laws and regulations of various non-U.S. jurisdictions and non-U.S. regulatory agencies and bodies, including the regulation of the Selector ManagementIGI Funds by Luxembourg's Commission de Surveillance du Secteur Financier as UCITS. As we broaden our distribution globally, we will become subject to increased international regulations, some of which are comparable to the regulations to which our United States operations are subject. Similar to the United States, non-U.S. regulatory agencies have broad authority in the event of non-compliance with laws and regulations.

        Our businesses may be materially affected not only by regulations applicable to us as an investment adviser, broker/dealer or transfer agent, but also by law and regulations of general application. For example, the volume of our principal investment advisory business in a given time period could be affected by, among other things, existing and proposed tax legislation and other governmental regulations and policies (including the interest rate policies of the Federal Reserve Board), and changes in the interpretation or enforcement of existing laws and rules that affect the business and financial communities.

        Our business is also subject to new and changing laws and regulations. For additional discussion regarding the impact of current and proposed legal or regulatory requirements, please see the "Regulatory Risk Is Substantial In Our Business And Non-Compliance With Regulations, Or Changes In Regulations, Could Have A Significant Impact On The Conduct Of Our Business, Reputation And Prospects" risk factor included in Item 1A—Risk Factors in this annual report.

Intellectual Property

        We regard our names as material to our business, and have registered certain service marks associated with our business with the United States Patent and Trademark Office.

Employees

        At December 31, 20142015 we had 1,6481,691 full-time employees, consisting of 1,3141,351 home office employees and 334340 employees responsible for advisor field supervision and administration.

Available Information

        We make available free of charge our proxy statements, annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K and amendments to those reports under the "Reports & SEC Filings" menu on the "Investor Relations" section of our internet website atwww.waddell.com as soon as it is reasonably practical after such filing has been made with the SEC.


Table of Contents

ITEM 1A.    Risk Factors

        You should carefully consider the following risk factors as well as the other risks and uncertainties contained in this Annual Report on Form 10-K or in our other SEC filings. The occurrence of one or more of these risks or uncertainties could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition, operating results and cash flows. In this Annual Report on Form 10-K, unless the context expressly requires a different reading, when we state that a factor could "adversely affect us," have a "material adverse effect on our business," "adversely affect our business" and similar expressions, we mean that the factor could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition, operating results and cash flows. Information contained in this section may be considered "forward-looking statements." See "Item 7—Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking"Part I—Forward Looking Statements" for a discussion of certain qualifications regarding forward-looking statements.

        An IncreasingA Significant Percentage Of Our Assets Under Management Are Distributed Through Our Wholesale Channel, Which Has Higher Redemption Rates Than Our Traditional Advisors Channel.    In recent years, we have focused on expanding distribution efforts relating to our Wholesale channel. The percentage of our assets under management in the Wholesale channel has increased from 10% at December 31, 2003 to 49%44% at December 31, 2014,2015, and the percentage of our total sales represented by the Wholesale channel has increased from 17% for the year ended December 31, 2003 to 67%61% for the year ended December 31, 2014.2015. The success of sales in our Wholesale channel depends upon our maintaining strong relationships with institutional accounts, certain strategic partners and our third party distributors. Many of those distribution sources also offer investors competing funds that are internally or externally managed, which could limit the distribution of our products. The loss of any of these distribution channels and the inability to continue to access new distribution channels could decrease our assets under management and adversely affect our results of operations and growth. There are no assurances that these channels and their client bases will continue to be accessible to us. The loss or diminution of the level of business we do with those providers could have a material adverse effect on our business, especially with the high concentration of assets in certain funds in this channel, namely the Ivy Asset Strategy fund. Compared to the industry average redemption rate of 24.7% and 25.7% for the years ended December 31, 20142015 and 2013,2014, respectively, the Wholesale channel had redemption rates of 34.8%43.0% and 25.2%34.8% for the years ended December 31, 20142015 and 2013,2014, respectively. Redemption rates were 8.3%9.1% and 8.9%8.3% for our Advisors channel in the same periods, reflecting the higher rate of transferability of investment assets in the Wholesale channel.

        Our Business Is Subject To Substantial Risk From Litigation, Regulatory Investigations And Potential Securities Laws Liability.    Many aspects of our business involve substantial risks of litigation, regulatory investigations and/or arbitration, and from time to time, we are involved in various legal proceedings in the course of operating our business. We are exposed to liability under federal and state securities laws, other federal and state laws and court decisions, as well as rules and regulations promulgated by the SEC, FINRA and other regulatory bodies. We, our subsidiaries, and/or certain of our past and present officers, have been named as parties in legal actions, regulatory investigations and proceedings, and securities arbitrations in the past and have been subject to claims alleging violation of such laws, rules and regulations, which have resulted in the payment of fines and settlements. An adverse resolution of any lawsuit, legal or regulatory proceeding or claim against us could result in substantial costs or reputational harm to us, and have a material adverse effect on our business. In addition to these financial costs and risks, the defense of litigation, regulatory investigations or arbitration may divert resources and management's attention from operations.

        Our Financial Advisors Are Classified As Independent Contractors, And Changes To Their Classification May Increase Our Operating Expenses.    From time to time, various legislative or regulatory proposals are introduced at the federal or state levels to change the status of independent contractors' classification to employees for either employment tax purposes (withholding, social security, Medicare and unemployment taxes) or other benefits available to employees. Currently, most individuals are classified as employees or


Table of Contents

independent contractors for employment tax purposes based on 20 "common law" factors, rather than any


Table of Contents

definition found in the Internal Revenue Code or Treasury regulations. We classify the majority of our financial advisors as independent contractors for all purposes, including employment tax and employee benefit purposes. There can be no assurance that legislative, judicial or regulatory (including tax) authorities will not introduce proposals or assert interpretations of existing rules and regulations that would change the independent contractor/employee classification of those financial advisors currently doing business with us. The costs associated with potential changes, if any, with respect to these independent contractor classifications could have a material adverse effect on our business.

        There May Be Adverse Effects On Our Business If Our Funds' Performance Declines.    Success in the investment management and mutual fund businesses is dependent on the investment performance of client accounts relative to market conditions and the performance of competing funds. Good relative performance stimulates sales of the Funds' shares and tends to keep redemptions low. Sales of the Funds' shares in turn generate higher management fees and distribution revenues. Good relative performance also attracts institutional and separate accounts. Conversely, poor relative performance results in decreased sales, increased redemptions of the Funds' shares and the loss of institutional and separate accounts, resulting in decreases in revenues. As of December 31, 2014, 22% and 7% of2015, 15% our assets under management were concentrated in the Ivy Asset Strategy fund and Ivy High Income fund, respectively.fund. As a result, our operating results are significantly affected by the performance of those fundsthat fund and our ability to minimize redemptions from and maintain assets under management in those funds.that fund. If a significant amount of investments are withdrawn from those fundsthat fund for any reason, our revenues would decline and our operating results would be adversely affected. Further, given the size and prominence of those fundsthe Ivy Asset Strategy fund within our product line, any adverse performance of those fundsthat fund may also indirectly affect the net sales and redemptions in our other products, which in turn may adversely affect our business.

        There May Be An Adverse Effect On Our Business If Our Investors Redeem The Assets We Manage On Short Notice.    Mutual fund investors may redeem their investments in our mutual funds at any time without any prior notice. Additionally, our investment management agreements with institutions and other non-mutual fund accounts are generally terminable upon relatively short notice. Investors can terminate their relationship with us, reduce their aggregate amount of assets under management, or shift their funds to other types of accounts with different rate structures for any number of reasons, including investment performance, changes in prevailing interest rates and financial market performance. The abilityrisk of our investors to redeemredeeming their investments in our mutual funds on short notice has increased materially due to the growth of assets in our Wholesale channel and the high concentration of assets in certain funds in this channel, including the Ivy Asset Strategy fund. The decrease in revenues that could result from any such event could have a material adverse effect on our business.

        We May Not Reduce Our Expenses Rapidly Enough To Align With Decreases In Our Revenues.    We expect that, as we transition our load-waived Class A shares to Class I shares in our investments advisory products, our operating revenue will be significantly lower in 2016. If we are unable to effect appropriate expense reductions in a timely manner through operational changes or performance improvement initiatives in response to this expected decline in our revenues or due to, among other things, the level of our assets under management or our current business environment, our business may be adversely affected.

        Regulatory Risk Is Substantial In Our Business And Non-Compliance With Regulations, Or Changes In Regulations, Could Have A Significant Impact On The Conduct Of Our Business, Reputation And Prospects.    Our investment advisory and broker/dealer businesses are heavily regulated, primarily at the federal level. Non-compliance with applicable laws or regulations could result in sanctions being levied against us, including fines and censures, suspension or expulsion from a certain jurisdiction or market, or the revocation of licenses. Non-compliance with applicable laws or regulations could also adversely affect our business, reputation and prospects. In addition, changes in current legal, regulatory, accounting, tax or compliance requirements or in governmental policies could adversely affect our operations, revenues and


Table of Contents

earnings by, among other things, increasing expenses and reducing investor interest in certain products we offer. Distribution fees paid to mutual fund distributors in accordance with Rule 12b-1 promulgated under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended ("Rule 12b-1"), are an important element of the distribution of the mutual funds we manage. TheIn 2010, the SEC has proposed replacing Rule 12b-1 with a new regulation that would significantly change current fund distribution practices in the industry. If this proposed regulation is adopted, it may have a material impact on the compensation we pay to distributors for distributing the mutual funds we manage and/or our ability to recover expenses related to the


Table of Contents

distribution of our funds, and thus could materially affect our business. In 2015, the U.S. Department of Labor (the "DOL") proposed regulations to expand the scope of a "fiduciary" under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended ("ERISA"), and Section 4975 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the "Code"), which, if enacted, would impact how advice can be provided to retirement account holders in 401(k) plans, individual retirement accounts and other qualified retirement programs. The DOL proposal also would create new exemptions and amend existing exemptions from the prohibited transaction rules applicable to fiduciaries under ERISA and the Code that would allow broker/dealers, investment advisers and others to continue to receive a variety of common forms of compensation that otherwise would be prohibited as conflicts of interest. If the proposed regulations are enacted, they may have a material impact on the provision of investment services to retirement accounts, including imposing additional compliance, reporting and operational requirements, which could negatively affect our business. Additionally, our profitability could be affected by rules and regulations that impact the business and financial communities generally, including changes to the laws governing state and federal taxation.

        Our Business And Prospects Could Be Adversely Affected If The Securities Markets Decline.    Our results of operations are affected by certain economic factors, including the success of the securities markets. The on-going existence of adverseAdverse market conditions, particularly the U.S. domestic stock market due to our high concentration of assets under management in that market, and lack of investor confidence could result in investors further withdrawing from the markets or decreasing their rate of investment, either of which could adversely affect our revenues, earnings and growth prospects to a greater extent. Because our revenues are, to a large extent, investment management fees that are based on the value of assets under management, a decline in the value of these assets adversely affects our revenues and earnings. Our growth is dependent to a significant degree upon our ability to attract and retain mutual fund assets, and, in an adverse economic environment, this may prove more difficult. Our growth rate has varied from year to year and there can be no assurance that our average growth rates sustained in recent years will continue. Declines in the securities markets could significantly reduce our future revenues and earnings. In addition, a decline in the market value of these assets could cause our clients to withdraw funds in favor of investments they perceive as offering greater opportunity or lower risk, which could also negatively impact our revenues and earnings. The combination of adverse market conditions reducing sales and investment management fees could compound on each other and materially affect our business.

        Our Ability To Hire And Retain Senior Executive Management And Other Key Personnel Is Significant To Our Success And Growth.    Our continued success depends to a substantial degree on our ability to attract and retain qualified senior executive management and other key personnel to conduct our broker/dealer, fund management and investment advisory businesses. The market for qualified fund managers, investment analysts, financial advisors and wholesalers is extremely competitive. Additionally, we are dependent on our financial advisors and select wholesale distributors to sell our mutual funds and other investment products. Our growth prospects will be directly affected by the quality, quantity and productivity of financial advisors and wholesalers we are able to successfully recruit and retain. There can be no assurances that we will be successful in our efforts to recruit and retain the required personnel.

        A Failure In Or Breach Of Our Operational Or Security Systems Or Our Technology Infrastructure, Or Those Of Third Parties, Could Result In A Material Adverse Effect On Our Business And Reputation.    We are highly dependent upon the use of various proprietary and third party software applications and other technology


Table of Contents

systems to operate our business. As part of our normal operations, we process a large number of transactions on a daily basis and maintain and transmit confidential client and employee information, the safety and security of which is dependent upon the effectiveness of our information security policies, procedures and capabilities to protect such systems and the data that reside on or are transmitted through them.

        Although we take protective measures and endeavor to modify these protective measures as circumstances warrant, technology is subject to rapid change and the nature of the threats continue to evolve. As a result, our operating and technology systems, software and networks may fail to operate properly or become disabled, or may be vulnerable to unauthorized access, inadvertent disclosure, loss or destruction of data (including confidential client information), computer viruses or other malicious code, cyber attacks and other events that could materially damage our operations, have an adverse security impact, or cause the disclosure or modification of sensitive or confidential information. Most of the software applications that we use in our business are licensed from, and supported, upgraded and maintained by, third party vendors. A suspension or termination of certain of these licenses or the related support, upgrades and maintenance could cause temporary system delays or interruption. We also take precautions to password protect and/or encrypt our laptops and other mobile electronic hardware. If such hardware is stolen, misplaced or left unattended, it may become vulnerable to hacking or other


Table of Contents

unauthorized use, creating a possible security risk and resulting in potentially costly actions by us. Further, while we have in place a disaster recovery plan to address catastrophic and unpredictable events, there is no guarantee that this plan will be sufficient in responding to or ameliorating the effects of all disaster scenarios, and we may experience system delays and interruptions as a result of natural disasters, power failures, acts of war, and third party failures.

        The breach of our operational or security systems or our technology infrastructure, or those of third parties, due to one or more of these events could cause interruptions, malfunctions or failures in our operations and/or the loss or inadvertent disclosure of confidential client information could result in substantial financial loss or costs, liability for stolen assets or information, breach of client contracts, client dissatisfaction and/or loss, regulatory actions, remediation costs to repair damage caused by the breach, additional security costs to mitigate against future incidents and litigation costs resulting from the incident. These events, and those discussed above, could have a material adverse effect on our business and reputation.

        There Is No Assurance That New Information Technology Systems Will Be Implemented Successfully.    A number of our key information technology systems were developed solely to handle our particular information technology infrastructure. We are in the process of implementing new information technology systems that we believe could facilitate and improve our core businesses and our productivity. There can be no assurance that we will be successful in implementing the new information technology systems or that their implementation will be completed in a timely or cost effective manner. Failure to implement or maintain adequate information technology infrastructure could impede our ability to support business growth.

        Support Provided To New Products May Reduce Fee Revenue, Increase Expenses And Expose Us To Potential Loss On Invested Capital.    We may support the development of new investment products by waiving a portion of the fees we usually receive for managing such products, by subsidizing expenses or by making seed capital investments. Seed investments in new products utilize Company capital that would otherwise be available for general corporate purposes and expose us to capital losses. There can be no assurance that new investment products we develop will be successful, which could have a material adverse effect on our business. Failure to have or devote sufficient capital to support new products could have an adverse impact on our future growth. Seed capital investments in new products utilize Company capital that would otherwise be available for general corporate purposes and expose us to capital losses due to investment market risk. Our non-operating investment and other income could be adversely affected by the realization of losses upon the disposition of our investments or the recognition of significant other-than-temporary impairments in the case of our available-for-sale portfolio and the recognition of unrealized losses related to our sponsored investment


Table of Contents

portfolios that are held as trading and accounted for under the equity method. We may use various derivative instruments to mitigate the risk of our seed capital investments, although some market risk would remain. The risk of loss may be greater for seed capital investments that are not hedged, or if an intended hedge does not perform as expected. Our use of derivatives would result in counterparty risk in the event of non-performance by counterparties to these derivative instruments, regulatory risk and the risk that the underlying positions do not move identically to the related derivative instruments. As a result, volatility in the capital markets may affect the value of our seed capital investments, which may increase the volatility of our earnings and adversely affect our business.

        Expansion Into International Markets May Increase Operational And Regulatory Risks.    As we broaden our distribution globally, we face increased operational and regulatory risks. The failure of our systems of internal control to properly mitigate such additional risks, or of our operating infrastructure to support such international expansion could result in operational failures and regulatory fines or sanctions. Local regulatory environments may vary widely and place additional demands on our sales, legal and compliance personnel. Identifying and hiring well qualified personnel and adopting policies, procedures and controls to address local or regional requirements require time and resources. Regulators in non-U.S. jurisdictions could also change their policies or laws in a manner that might restrict or otherwise impede our ability to offer our investment strategies in their respective markets. Any of these local requirements, activities or needs could increase the costs and expenses we incur in a specific jurisdiction without any corresponding increase in revenues and income from operating in the jurisdiction.

        We Have Substantial Intangibles On Our Balance Sheet, And Any Impairment Of Our Intangibles Could Adversely Affect Our Results of Operations.    At December 31, 2014,2015, our total assets were approximately $1.5$1.6 billion, of which approximately $158.1 million, or 10%, consisted of goodwill and identifiable intangible assets. We complete an ongoing review of goodwill and intangible assets for impairment on an annual basis or more frequently whenever events or a change in circumstances warrant. Important factors in determining whether an impairment of goodwill or intangible assets might exist include significant continued underperformance compared to peers, the likelihood of termination or non-renewal of a mutual fund advisory or subadvisory contract or substantial changes in revenues earned from such contracts,


Table of Contents

significant changes in our business and products, material and ongoing negative industry or economic trends, or other factors specific to each asset or subsidiary being tested. Because of the significance of goodwill and other intangibles to our consolidated balance sheets, the impairment analysis is critical. Any changes in key assumptions about our business and our prospects, or changes in market conditions or other externalities, could result in an impairment charge. Any such charge could have a material effect on our results of operations.

        There May Be Adverse Effects On Our Business Upon The Termination Of, Or Failure To Renew, Certain Agreements.    A majority of our revenues are derived from investment management agreements with the Funds that, as required by law, are terminable on 60 days' notice. Each investment management agreement must be approved and renewed annually by the disinterested members of each Fund's board of trustees or its shareholders, as required by law. Additionally, our investment management agreements provide for automatic termination in the event of assignment, which includes a change of control, without the consent of our clients and, in the case of the Funds, approval of the Funds' board of directors/trustees and shareholders to continue the agreements. There can be no assurances that our clients will consent to any assignment of our investment management agreements, or that those and other contracts will not be terminated or will be renewed on favorable terms, if at all, at their expiration and new agreements may not be available. See "Business—Distribution Channels—Wholesale Channel, Institutional Channel." The decrease in revenues that could result from any such event could have a material adverse effect on our business.

        Regulations Restricting The Use Of "Soft Dollars" Could Result In An Increase In Our Expenses.    On behalf of our mutual fund and investment advisory clients, we make decisions to buy and sell securities for each


Table of Contents

portfolio, select broker/dealers to execute trades, and negotiate brokerage commission rates. In connection with these transactions, we may receive "soft dollar credits" from broker/dealers that we can use to defray certain of our expenses. If regulations are adopted eliminating the ability of asset managers to use "soft dollars," our operating expenses could increase.

        Fee Pressures Could Reduce Our Revenues And Profitability.    There is a trend toward lower fees in some segments of the investment management business. In addition, the SEC has adopted rules that are designed to improve mutual fund corporate governance, which could result in further downward pressure on investment advisory fees in the mutual fund industry. Accordingly, there can be no assurance that we will be able to maintain our current fee structure. Fee reductions on existing or future new business could adversely affect us.

        Challenges To Our Tax Positions May Adversely Affect Our Effective Tax Rate and Business.    The application of complex tax laws and regulations involves numerous uncertainties. Tax authorities may disagree with certain tax positions that we have taken and assess additional taxes, which could result in adjustments to, or impact the timing or amount of, taxable income, deductions or other tax allocations, which may adversely affect our effective tax rate and business.

        We Could Experience Adverse Effects On Our Market Share Due To Strong Competition From Numerous And Sometimes Larger Companies.    We compete with stock brokerage firms, mutual fund companies, investment banking firms, insurance companies, banks, internet investment sites, and other financial institutions and individual registered investment advisers. Many of these companies not only offer mutual fund investments and services, but also offer an ever-increasing number of other financial products and services. Many of our competitors have more products and product lines, services and brand recognition and may also have substantially greater assets under management. Many larger mutual fund complexes have developed more extensive relationships with brokerage houses with large distribution networks, which may enable those fund complexes to reach broader client bases. In recent years, there has been a trend of consolidation in the mutual fund industry resulting in stronger competitors with greater financial resources than us. There has also been a trend toward online internet financial services. If existing or potential customers decide to invest with our competitors instead of with us, our market share could decline, which could have a material adverse effect on our business.


Table of Contents

        The Terms Of Our Credit Facility And Senior Unsecured Notes Impose Restrictions On Our Operations That May Adversely Impact Our Prospects And The Operations Of Our Business.    There are no assurances that we will be able to raise additional capital if needed, which could negatively impact our liquidity, prospects and operations. We have entered into a 5-year revolving credit facility with various lenders providing for total availability of $125.0 million. Under this facility, the lenders may, at their option upon our request, expand the facility to $200.0 million. At February 13, 2015,12, 2016, there was no balance outstanding under the revolving credit facility. We also entered into a note purchase agreement with various purchasers for the sale and issuance of $190.0 million of unsecured senior notes comprised of $95 million of 5.0% senior notes, series A, due 2018 and $95 million of 5.75% senior notes, series B, due 2021, all of which were issued on January 13, 2011. The terms and conditions of our revolving credit facility and note purchase agreement impose restrictions that affect, among other things, our ability to incur additional debt, make capital expenditures and acquisitions, merge, sell assets, pay dividends and create or incur liens. Our ability to comply with the financial covenants set forth in our credit facility and note purchase agreement could be affected by events beyond our control, and there can be no assurance that we will achieve operating results that will comply with such terms and conditions, a breach of which could result in a default under our credit facility and note purchase agreement. In the event of a default under the credit facility and/or note purchase agreement, the banks could elect to declare the outstanding principal amount of our credit facility, all interest thereon, and all other amounts payable under our credit facility to be immediately due and payable, and the Company's obligations under the senior unsecured notes could be accelerated and become due and payable, including any make-whole amount, respectively.


Table of Contents

        Our ability to meet our cash needs and satisfy our debt obligations will depend upon our future operating performance, asset values, the perception of our creditworthiness and, indirectly, the market value of our stock. These factors will be affected by prevailing economic, financial and business conditions and other circumstances, some of which are beyond our control. We anticipate that any funds generated by the issuance of our senior unsecured notes and any borrowings from our existing credit facility and/or cash provided by operating activities will provide sufficient funds to finance our business plans, meet our operating expenses and service our debt obligations as they become due. However, in the event that we require additional capital, there can be no assurance that we will be able to raise such capital when needed or on satisfactory terms, if at all, and there can be no assurance that we will be able to renew or refinance our credit facility or senior unsecured notes upon their maturity or on favorable terms. If we are unable to raise capital or obtain financing, we may be forced to incur unanticipated costs or revise our business plan.

        Our Own Operational Failures Or Those Of Third Parties We Rely On, Including Failures Arising Out Of Human Error, Could Disrupt Our Business And Damage Our Reputation.    Our business is highly dependent on our ability to process, on a daily basis, large numbers of transactions. These transactions generally must comply with client investment guidelines, as well as stringent legal and regulatory standards. Despite our employees being highly trained and skilled, due to the large number of transactions we process errors may occur. If we make mistakes in performing our services that cause financial harm to our clients, our clients may seek to recover their losses. The occurrence of mistakes, particularly significant ones, could have a material adverse effect on our reputation and business.

        Potential Misuse Of Funds And Information In The Possession Of Our Employees And/Or Advisors Could Result In Liability To Our Clients, Subject Us To Regulatory Sanctions Or Otherwise Adversely Affect Our Business.    Our business is based on the trust and confidence of our clients, for whom our financial advisors handle a significant amount of funds, as well as financial and personal information. Although we have implemented a system of internal controls to minimize the risk of fraudulent taking or misuse of funds and confidential information, there can be no assurance that our controls will be adequate or that a taking or misuse of funds and confidential information by our employees or financial advisors can be prevented. We could be liable in the event of a taking or misuse of funds and confidential information by our employees or financial advisors and we could also be subject to regulatory sanctions. Although we believe that we have adequately insured against these risks, there can be no assurance that our insurance will be maintained or


Table of Contents

that it will be adequate to meet any liability resulting from these activities. Any damage to the trust and confidence placed in us by our clients may cause our assets under management to decline, which could adversely affect our business and prospects.

        There Are No Assurances That We Will Pay Future Dividends, Which Could Adversely Affect Our Stock Price.    The Waddell & Reed Financial, Inc. Board of Directors (the "Board of Directors") currently intends to continue to declare quarterly dividends on our Class A common stock. However, the declaration and payment of dividends is subject to the discretion of our Board of Directors. Any determination as to the payment of dividends, as well as the level of such dividends, will depend on, among other things, general economic and business conditions, our strategic plans, our financial results and condition, and contractual, legal, and regulatory restrictions on the payment of dividends by us or our subsidiaries. We are a holding company and, as such, our ability to pay dividends is subject to the ability of our subsidiaries to provide us with cash. There can be no assurance that the current quarterly dividend level will be maintained or that we will pay any dividends in any future period. Any change in the level of our dividends or the suspension of the payment of dividends could adversely affect our stock price.

        Our Stockholders Rights Plan Could Deter Takeover Attempts, Which Some Of Our Stockholders May Believe To Be In Their Best Interest.    Under certain conditions, the rights under our stockholders rights plan entitle the holders of such rights to receive shares of our common stock having a value equal to two times the exercise price of the right. The rights are attached to each share of our outstanding common stock and generally are exercisable only if a person or group acquires 15% or more of the voting power represented


Table of Contents

by our common stock. Our stockholders rights plan could impede the completion of a merger, tender offer, or other takeover attempt even though some or a majority of our stockholders might believe that a merger, tender offer or takeover is in their best interests, and even if such a transaction could result in our stockholders receiving a premium for their shares of our stock over the then current market price of our stock.

        Provisions Of Our Organizational Documents Could Deter Takeover Attempts, Which Some Of Our Stockholders May Believe To Be In Their Best Interest.    Under our Restated Certificate of Incorporation, our Board of Directors has the authority, without action by our stockholders, to fix certain terms and issue shares of our Preferred Stock, par value $1.00 per share. Actions of our Board of Directors pursuant to this authority may have the effect of delaying, deterring or preventing a change in control of the Company. Other provisions in our Restated Certificate of Incorporation and in our Amended and Restated Bylaws impose procedural and other requirements that could be deemed to have anti-takeover effects, including replacing incumbent directors. Our Board of Directors is divided into three classes, each of which is to serve for a staggered three-year term after the initial classification and election, and incumbent directors may not be removed without cause, all of which may make it more difficult for a third party to gain control of our Board of Directors. In addition, as a Delaware corporation we are subject to section 203 of the Delaware General Corporation Law. With certain exceptions, section 203 imposes restrictions on mergers and other business combinations between us and any holder of 15% or more of our voting stock.

        Our Holding Company Structure Results In Structural Subordination And May Affect Our Ability To Fund Our Operations And Make Payments On Our Debt.    We are a holding company and, accordingly, substantially all of our operations are conducted through our subsidiaries. As a result, our cash flow and our ability to service our debt, including $190.0 million of our senior notes, are dependent upon the earnings of our subsidiaries and the distribution of earnings, loans or other payments by our subsidiaries to us. Our subsidiaries are separate and distinct legal entities and have no obligation to pay any amounts due on our debt or provide us with funds for our payment obligations, whether by dividends, distributions, loans or other payments. In addition, any payment of dividends, distributions, loans or advances to us by our subsidiaries could be subject to statutory or contractual restrictions. Payments to us by our subsidiaries will also be contingent upon our subsidiaries' earnings and business considerations. Our right to receive any assets of any of our subsidiaries upon their liquidation or reorganization, and therefore the right of the


Table of Contents

holders of our debt to participate in those assets, would be effectively subordinated to the claims of those subsidiaries' creditors, including trade creditors. In addition, even if we were a creditor of any of our subsidiaries, our rights as a creditor would be effectively subordinate to any security interest in the assets of our subsidiaries and any indebtedness of our subsidiaries senior to that held by us.

ITEM 1B.    Unresolved Staff Comments

        None.

ITEM 2.    Properties

        We own four buildings in the vicinity of buildings currently leased by our home offices:office: two 50,000 square foot buildings and a 52,000 square foot building located in Overland Park, Kansas and a 45,000 square foot building located in Mission, Kansas. ExistingOur existing home office lease agreements cover approximately 298,000 square feet for Waddell & Reed located in Overland Park, Kansas and 38,000 square feet for our disaster recovery facility. In addition, we lease office space for sales management in various locations throughout the United States totaling approximately 667,000688,000 square feet. A majority of this office space is available to our financial advisors to use. In the opinion of management, the office space owned and leased by the Company is adequate for existing operating needs.

ITEM 3.    Legal Proceedings

        The Company is involved from time to time in various legal proceedings, regulatory investigations and claims incident to the normal conduct of business, which may include proceedings that are specific to us


Table of Contents

and others generally applicable to business practices within the industries in which we operate. A substantial legal liability or a significant regulatory action against us could have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition and on the results of operations in a particular quarter or year.

        The Company accrues an undiscounted liabilityestablishes reserves for litigation and similar matters when those matters present material loss contingencies where the incurrence of a loss isthat management determines to be both probable and the amount can be reasonably estimated.estimable in accordance with Accounting Standards Codification ("ASC")"Contingencies Topic," ASC 450. These amounts are not reduced by amounts that may be recovered under insurance or claims against third parties, but undiscounted receivables from insurers or other third parties may be accrued separately. The Company regularly revises such accruals in light of new information. For contingencies where an unfavorable outcome is reasonably possible and that are significant, theThe Company discloses the nature of the contingency when management believes it is reasonably possible the outcome may be significant to the Company's consolidated financial statements and, where feasible, an estimate of the possible loss. For purposes of our litigation contingency disclosures, "significant" includes material matters as well as other items that management believes should be disclosed. Management's judgment is required related to contingent liabilities because the outcomes are difficult to predict.

        In ouran action filed on February 18, 2016 in the United States District Court for the District of Kansas,Saket Kapor(sic), Peter Brockett and Hieu Phan v. Ivy Investment Management Company, et. al. (Case No. 2:16-cv-02106-JWL-TJJ), the Company's registered investment advisor subsidiaries, the trustees of two of the Company's affiliated mutual funds, and an officer of a Company subsidiary were sued in a putative derivative action by three mutual fund shareholders alleging breach of fiduciary duty and breach of contract claims relating to investments held in the affiliated mutual funds. On behalf of the mutual funds, Plaintiffs seek monetary damages and demand a jury trial. To date, no responsive pleading has been filed and no discovery has taken place.

        In the opinion of management, the likelihoodultimate resolution and outcome of this matter is uncertain. Given the preliminary nature of the proceedings and the Company's dispute over the merits of the claims, the Company is unable to estimate a range of reasonably possible loss, if any, that any pending legal proceeding, regulatory investigation, claim, or other contingency willsuch matter may represent. While the ultimate resolution of this matter is uncertain, an adverse determination against the Company could have a material adverse effectimpact on our business, financial condition orand results of operations is remote.operations.

ITEM 4.    Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security HoldersMine Safety Disclosures

        During the fourth quarter of the fiscal year covered by this report, no matter was submitted to a vote of the Company's security holders, through the solicitation of proxies or otherwise.Not applicable.


Table of Contents


PART II

ITEM 5.    Market for Registrant's Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

        Our Class A common stock ("common stock") is traded on the NYSE under the ticker symbol "WDR." The following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, the high and low sale prices of our common stock, as reported by the NYSE, as well as the cash dividends declared for these time periods:


Market Price

 
 2014 2013 
Quarter
 High
 Low
 Dividends
Per
Share

 High
 Low
 Dividends
Per
Share

 
            
 1 $74.33 $61.49 $0.34 $43.87 $35.67 $0.28 
 2  76.46  59.00  0.34  48.08  38.70  0.28 
 3  65.57  51.25  0.34  55.03  43.09  0.28 
 4  51.84  42.39  0.43  66.09  50.76  0.34 
 
 2015 2014 
Quarter
 High
 Low
 Dividends
Per
Share

 High
 Low
 Dividends
Per
Share

 
            
 1 $51.80 $41.06 $0.43 $74.33 $61.49 $0.34 
 2  51.23  45.89  0.43  76.46  59.00  0.34 
 3  48.05  33.64  0.43  65.57  51.25  0.34 
 4  38.85  27.82  0.46  51.84  42.39  0.43 

        Year-end closing prices of our common stock were $28.66 and $49.82 for 2015 and $65.12 for 2014, and 2013, respectively. The closing price of our common stock on February 13, 201512, 2016 was $49.94.$22.35.

        According to the records of our transfer agent, we had 2,4332,442 holders of record of common stock as of February 13, 2015.12, 2016. We believe that a substantially larger number of beneficial stockholders hold such shares in depository or nominee form.

Dividends

        The declaration of dividends is subject to the discretion of the Board of Directors. We intend, from time to time, to pay cash dividends on our common stock as our Board of Directors deems appropriate, after consideration of our operating results, financial condition, cash and capital requirements, compliance with covenants in our revolving credit facility, note purchase agreement and such other factors as the Board of Directors deems relevant. To the extent assets are used to meet minimum net capital requirements under the Net Capital Rule, they are not available for distribution to stockholders as dividends. See Part I, Item 1. "Business—Regulation." We anticipate that quarterly dividends will continue to be paid.

Common Stock Repurchases

        Our Board of Directors has authorized the repurchase of our common stock in the open market and/or private purchases. The acquired shares may be used for corporate purposes, including shares issued to employees in our stock-based compensation programs. During the year ended December 31, 2014,2015, we repurchased 2,252,1521,955,509 shares in the open market and privately at an aggregate cost, including commissions, of $131.0$80.3 million, including 599,340432,353 shares from related partiesemployees to cover their tax withholdings from the vesting of shares granted under our stock-based compensation programs. The aggregate cost of shares obtained from related parties during 20142015 was $40.9$19.1 million. The purchase price paid by us for private repurchases of our common stock from related parties is the closing market price on the purchase date.


Table of Contents

        The following table sets forth certain information about the shares of common stock we repurchased during the fourth quarter of 2014.2015.

Period
 Total Number of
Shares Purchased
(1)
 Average
Price Paid
per Share
 Total Number of
Shares
Purchased as
Part of Publicly
Announced
Program
 Maximum Number (or
Approximate Dollar
Value) of Shares That
May Yet Be
Purchased Under The
Program
  Total Number
of Shares
Purchased (1)
 Average
Price Paid
per Share
 Total Number of
Shares
Purchased as
Part of Publicly
Announced
Program
 Maximum Number (or
Approximate Dollar
Value) of Shares That
May Yet Be
Purchased Under The
Program
 

October 1 - October 31

 450,000 $47.89 450,000 n/a (1) 30,000 $34.26 30,000 n/a (1)

November 1 - November 30

 699 48.86  n/a (1) 130,535 35.80 130,000 n/a (1)

December 1 - December 31

 279,183 47.64 108,623 n/a (1) 359,619 31.58 240,000 n/a (1)

Total

 729,882 $47.80 558,623    520,154 $32.79 400,000   

(1)
On August 31, 1998, we announced that our Board of Directors approved a program to repurchase shares of our common stock on the open market. Under the repurchase program, we are authorized to repurchase, in any seven-day period, the greater of (i) 3% of our outstanding common stock or (ii) $50 million of our common stock. We may repurchase our common stock in privately negotiated transactions or through the New York Stock Exchange, other national or regional market systems, electronic communication networks or alternative trading systems. Our stock repurchase program does not have an expiration date or an aggregate maximum number or dollar value of shares that may be repurchased. Our Board of Directors reviewed and ratified the stock repurchase program in October 2012. During the fourth quarter of 2014, 558,6232015, 400,000 shares of our common stock were repurchased pursuant to the repurchase program and 171,259120,154 shares, reflected in the table above, were purchased in connection with funding employee income tax withholding obligations arising from the vesting of nonvested shares.

Table of Contents

Total Return Performance

Comparison of Cumulative Total Return (1)



        The above graph compares the cumulative total stockholder return on the Company's common stock from December 31, 20092010 through December 31, 2014,2015, with the cumulative total return of the Standard & Poor's 500 Stock Index and the SNL Asset Manager Index. The SNL Asset Manager Index is a composite of 4144 publicly traded asset management companies (including, among others, the companies in the peer group reviewed by the Compensation Committee for executive compensation purposes) prepared by SNL Financial, Charlottesville, Virginia. The graph assumes the investment of $100 in the Company's common stock and in each of the two indices on December 31, 20092010 with all dividends being reinvested. The closing price of the Company's common stock on December 31, 20092010 (the last trading day of the year) was $30.54$35.29 per share. The stock price performance on the graph is not necessarily indicative of future price performance.


 Period Ending  
 Period Ending
  
Index
 12/31/09
 12/31/10
 12/31/11
 12/31/12
 12/31/13
 12/31/14
  
 12/31/10
 12/31/11
 12/31/12
 12/31/13
 12/31/14
 12/31/15
  
  
  

Waddell & Reed Financial, Inc.

 100.00 118.58 85.56 127.03 243.76 190.73   100.00 72.16 107.13 205.58 160.85 96.28  

SNL Asset Manager

 100.00 115.11 99.56 127.74 196.30 207.09   100.00 86.50 110.97 170.54 179.91 153.43  

S&P 500

 100.00 115.06 117.49 136.30 180.44 205.14   100.00 102.11 118.45 156.82 178.28 180.75  


Table of Contents

ITEM 6.    Selected Financial Data

        The following table sets forth our selected consolidated financial and other data as of the dates and for the periods indicated, and reflects continuing operations data. Selected financial data should be read in conjunction with, and is qualified in its entirety by, "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" and our Consolidated Financial Statements and the Notes thereto appearing elsewhere in this report.


 For the Year Ended December 31,  For the Year Ended December 31, 

 2014 2013 2012 2011 2010  2015 2014 2013 2012 2011 

 (in thousands, except per share data, percentages, sales and
personnel data)

  (in thousands, except per share data, percentages, sales and personnel data)
 

Revenues from:

                      

Investment management fees

 $768,102 650,442 549,231 530,599 457,538  $709,562 768,102 650,442 549,231 530,599 

Underwriting and distribution fees

 678,678 582,819 496,465 469,484 410,380  663,998 678,678 582,819 496,465 469,484 

Shareholder service fees

 150,979 137,093 128,109 122,449 110,348  143,071 150,979 137,093 128,109 122,449 

Total revenues

 1,597,759 1,370,354 1,173,805 1,122,532 978,266  1,516,631 1,597,759 1,370,354 1,173,805 1,122,532 

Income from continuing operations

 
$

313,331
 
252,998
 
192,528
 
172,205
 
153,428
 

Net income

 
$

245,536
 
313,331
 
252,998
 
192,528
 
172,205
 

Operating margin

 
30%
 
28%
 
26%
 
25%
 
25%
  
27%
 
30%
 
28%
 
26%
 
25%
 

Net income per share from continuing operations, basic and diluted

 
$

3.71
 
2.96
 
2.25
 
2.01
 
1.79
  
$

2.94
 
3.71
 
2.96
 
2.25
 
2.01
 

Dividends declared per common share

 
$

1.45
 
1.18
 
2.03
 
0.85
 
0.77
  
$

1.75
 
1.45
 
1.18
 
2.03
 
0.85
 

Wholesale channel data:

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Sales (in millions)

 $18,534 21,411 15,930 16,873 14,743  $12,218 18,534 21,411 15,930 16,873 

Number of external wholesalers

 59 50 50 51 46  61 59 50 50 51 

Advisor channel data:

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Sales (in millions)

 $5,545 5,232 4,505 4,153 3,953  $5,073 5,545 5,232 4,505 4,153 

Advisors' productivity (1)

 $254 215 180 165 125  $265 254 215 180 165 

Average number of financial advisors

 1,750 1,749 1,762 1,757 2,019  1,774 1,750 1,749 1,762 1,757 

Institutional channel sales (in millions)

 
$

3,392
 
3,108
 
2,720
 
3,526
 
3,703
  
$

2,743
 
3,392
 
3,108
 
2,720
 
3,526
 

Shares outstanding at December 31

 
83,654
 
85,236
 
85,679
 
85,564
 
85,751
  
82,850
 
83,654
 
85,236
 
85,679
 
85,564
 

 


 As of December 31,  As of December 31, 

 2014 2013 2012 2011 2010  2015 2014 2013 2012 2011 

 (in millions, except for percentages)
  (in millions, except for percentages)
 

Assets under management

 $123,650 126,543 96,365 83,157 83,673  $104,399 123,650 126,543 96,365 83,157 

Diversification (company total)

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

As % of Sales

                      

Asset Strategy

 25% 29% 26% 37% 46%  13% 25% 29% 26% 37% 

Fixed Income

 26% 29% 34% 18% 13%  21% 26% 29% 34% 18% 

Other

 49% 42% 40% 45% 41%  66% 49% 42% 40% 45% 

As % of Assets Under Management

                      

Asset Strategy

 29% 34% 34% 35% 37%  21% 29% 34% 34% 35% 

Fixed Income

 18% 18% 21% 17% 13%  18% 18% 18% 21% 17% 

Other

 53% 48% 45% 48% 50%  61% 53% 48% 45% 48% 

Balance sheet data:

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Goodwill and identifiable intangible assets

 $158.1 162.0 162.0 162.0 162.0  $158.1 158.1 162.0 162.0 162.0 

Total assets

 1,511.9 1,337.0 1,152.8 1,082.4 976.9  1,555.7 1,511.9 1,337.0 1,152.8 1,082.4 

Long-term debt

 190.0 190.0 190.0 190.0 190.0  190.0 190.0 190.0 190.0 190.0 

Total liabilities

 725.8 649.7 642.6 558.8 519.8  709.3 725.8 649.7 642.6 558.8 

Stockholders' equity

 786.1 687.3 510.2 523.6 457.1  846.5 786.1 687.3 510.2 523.6 

(1)
Advisor productivity is calculated by dividing underwriting and distribution revenues for the Advisors channel by the average number of advisors during the year.

Table of Contents

ITEM 7.    Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

This Annual Report on Form 10-K contains "forward-looking statements" within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, which reflect the current views and assumptions of management with respect to future events regarding our business and the industry in general. These forward-looking statements include all statements, other than statements of historical fact, regarding our financial position, business strategy and other plans and objectives for future operations, including statements with respect to revenues and earnings, the amount and composition of assets under management, distribution sources, expense levels, redemption rates and the financial markets and other conditions. These statements are generally identified by the use of words such as "may," "could," "should," "would," "believe," "anticipate," "forecast," "estimate," "expect," "intend," "plan," "project," "outlook," "will," "potential" and similar statements of a future or forward-looking nature. Readers are cautioned that any forward-looking information provided by or on behalf of the Company is not a guarantee of future performance. Certain important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from our expectations are disclosed in the Item 1 "Business" and Item 1A "Risk Factors" sections of this Annual Report on Form 10-K, which include, without limitation, the adverse effect from a decline in securities markets or in the relative investment performance of our products, our inability to pay future dividends, the loss of existing distribution channels or the inability to access new ones, a reduction of the assets we manage on short notice, and adverse results of litigation and/or arbitration. The forgoing factors should not be construed as exhaustive and should be read together with other cautionary statements included in this and other reports and filings we make with the SEC. All forward-looking statements speak only as of the date on which they are made and we undertake no duty to update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.

        The following should be read in conjunction with the "Selected Financial Data" and our Consolidated Financial Statements and Notes thereto appearing elsewhere in this report.

Executive Overview

        We are one of the oldest mutual fund and asset management firms in the country, with expertise in a broad range of investment styles and across a variety of market environments. Our earnings and cash flows are heavily dependent on financial market conditions. Significant increases or decreases in the various securities markets can have a material impact on our results of operations, financial condition and cash flows.

Revenue Sources

        We derive our revenues from providing investment management and advisory services, investment product underwriting and distribution, and shareholder services administration to mutual funds, UCITS sub-funds,the Funds, the IGI Funds, and institutional and separately managed accounts. Investment management and/or advisory fees are based on the amount of average assets under management and are affected by sales levels, financial market conditions, redemptions and the composition of assets. Our underwriting and distribution revenues consist of Rule 12b-1 asset-based service and distribution fees, fees earned on fee-based asset allocation products and related advisory services, distribution fees on certain variable products, and commissions derived from sales of investment and insurance products. The products sold have various commission structures and the revenues received from those sales vary based on the type and dollar amount sold. Shareholder service fee revenue includes transfer agency fees, custodian fees from retirement plan accounts, portfolio accounting and administration fees, and is earned based on assets under management or number of client accounts.

Expense Drivers

        Our major expenses are for commissions, employee compensation, field support, dealer services and information technology.


Table of Contents

Our Distribution Channels

        One of our distinctive qualities is that we distribute our investment products through a balanced distribution network. Our retail products are distributed through our Wholesale channel, which includes third parties such as other broker/dealers, registered investment advisors and various retirement platforms or through our Advisors channel sales force of independent financial advisors. We also market our investment advisory services to institutional investors, either directly or through consultants, in our Institutional channel.

        Our Wholesale channel is our fastest growing distribution channel. Channel efforts are led by the solid long-term performance record of the Ivy Funds family.Funds. We distribute retail mutual funds through broker/dealers, registered investment advisors and various retirement platforms through a team of external, internal and hybrid wholesalers as well as a team dedicated to national accounts.

        The Ivy Funds maintain strong positions on many of the leading third party distribution platforms, and we continue efforts to diversify our sales by offering other solid performing funds besides our flagship Ivy Asset Strategy fund to our partners.sales. During 2014,2015, we had nine funds exceed gross sales of $250 million. Sales of products other than our Ivy Asset Strategy fund accounted for 66%83% of total Ivy Funds sales during 20142015 compared to 66% during 2014 and 64% during 2013 and 68% for 2012.2013. We expect the Wholesale channel to be critical in driving our organic growth rate in the coming years.

        Our Advisors channel sales force consists of 1,7661,819 independent financial advisors spread throughout the United States, who carry out our mission of providing financial advice for retirement, education funding, estate planning and other financial needs for our clients. A distinguishing aspect of this channel is its low redemption rate, which can be attributed to the personal and customized nature in which our


Table of Contents

advisors provide service to our clients by focusing on meeting their long-term financial objectives, andobjectives; this, in turn, leads to a more stable asset base for the channel.

        We have focused our recruiting efforts on bringing in experienced advisors, which has allowed us to achieve productivity growth, as Advisors channel underwriting and distribution fee revenues per advisor increased 18%4%, to $254$265 thousand, andwhile sales in the channel increased 23%decreased 3%, to $5.5$5.1 billion, during the past two years.

        Through our Institutional channel we manage assets in a variety of investment styles for a variety of types of institutions as well as the Selector ManagementIGI Funds. The largest percentage of our clients hire us to act as subadvisor for their branded products; they are typically domestic or foreign distributors of investment products who lack scale or the track record to manage internally, or choose to market multi-manager styles. Our subadvisory relationships accountaccounted for more than 70% of the channel's $17.8$15.4 billion in assets at the end of 2014.2015. Our diverse client list also includes pension funds, Taft-Hartley plans and endowments.

Strategic Initiatives

        As previously announced in 2016, we will undertake a modernization of our brokerage and product platform that will include the restructuring of our share classes. This new platform will move us from a paper-based, labor intensive environment to one utilizing innovative brokerage platform technology, which also will include significant enhancements to our investment advisory programs, financial planning capabilities and client experience, all of which we expect to enhance both advisor and back-office efficiency. As part of this effort, we intend to convert load-waived Class A shares into the more widely used institutional shares (Class I or Y) as the exclusive share classes in our investment advisory programs. This step is consistent with industry trends and will allow us to compete more effectively for investment advisory assets. The share conversion is expected to occur in mid-2016, and the platform launch will likely take place in the third quarter of 2016. We believe that these initiatives, referred to internally as "Project E," positions the Advisors channel has experienced positive gross sales and net flow trends overfor long-term competitiveness.

        With the past two yearsstaged implementation of Project E, we expect operating income to be reduced by approximately $29.0 million in 2016 due to one-time and on-going costs associated with Project E, and a reduction in our growing subadvisory relationships.

SaleRule 12b-1 asset-based service and distribution fee revenue following the conversion of Legend

        During 2012, the Company signedapproximately $17.6 billion in assets under management in our investment advisory programs from load-waived Class A shares to institutional shares classes. Load-waived Class A shares held in advisory programs have historically charged a definitive agreement to sell all the common interestsmaximum fee of Legend and the sale closed effective January 1, 2013. Based on the value0.25% of the consideration the Company expected to receive upon closing, which was less than the carrying value ofaverage daily net assets under management pursuant to be sold, the Company recordedapplicable Rule 12b-1 service and distribution plan; institutional shares classes do not charge a non-cash impairment charge of $42.4Rule 12b-1 fee. Rule 12b-1 service and distribution revenue on load-waived Class A share mutual funds held in advisory program accounts was $41.8 million which is reflected in income (loss) from discontinued operations onand $37.8 million for the statement of income in 2012. The consideration received was subject to working capitalyears ended December 31, 2015 and regulatory capital adjustments through the closing date. The Company retained $7.7 million of Legend's excess working capital as part of the agreement. An earnout receivable of $4.1 million was accrued as of December 31, 2014, respectively. Since the Company currently pays a large portion of the Rule 12b-1 service and we received paymentdistribution fees it receives from load-waived Class A share mutual funds held in February 2015.

        The operational resultsadvisory program accounts to the financial advisors servicing and distributing the shares, the impact of Legend have been presented as discontinued operationsthe loss of Rule 12b-1 fee revenue is somewhat offset by the corresponding reduction in Rule 12b-1 fee payments to be made to financial advisors. Rule 12b-1 fee payments to financial advisors were $28.8 million and $25.8 million for the consolidated financial statements for all periods presented. Unless otherwise stated, references in Management's Discussionyears ended December 31, 2015 and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations refers to continuing operations.December 31, 2014, respectively.


Table of Contents

        The following are the components of the estimated $29.0 million impact to 2016 operating income based on December 31, 2015, assets and an assumed July 1, 2016, conversion date (amounts in millions):


2016 Impact

Revenues:

       

Underwriting and distribution fees

 $(19)   

Shareholder service fees

  (8)   

Total

     (27)

Operating expenses:

  
 
  
 
 

Underwriting and distribution

       

12b-1 payout (direct)

  (11)   

Platform (indirect)

  8    

Other

  1    

Total

     (2)

General and administrative

  
 
  
 
 

Networking fees

  4    

Total

     4 

Pre-tax operating income

    
$

(29

)

        To offset the projected decrease in 2016 operating income, we will undertake significant cost reduction efforts to reduce fixed costs by approximately 10%, or $40.0 million, on our annual run-rate basis over the next 12-18 months, with a goal to realize approximately two-thirds of the reduction in 2016. The Company's profitability may be adversely impacted if the Company in unable to generate additional revenue in lieu of Rule 12b-1 fees associated with load-waived Class A shares or if it is unsuccessful in its cost reduction efforts.

        Additionally, in an effort to globalize our distribution network and further strategic goals, our Institutional and Wholesale channels will work together to establish a footprint in London by mid 2016.

Operating Results

        The Company ended the year with $1.6$1.5 billion in revenues. The revenue increasedecrease of 17%5% relative to 20132014 was reflective of an increasea decrease in our average managed assets of 19%10%. Average assets under management were $117.6 billion in 2015 compared to $130.1 billion in 20142014. Net income decreased 22% compared to $109.2 billion in 2013. Income from continuing operations increased 24% compared to 20132014 while our operating margin improveddeclined to 27.4% from 28.1% to 30.3%.

        Our balance sheet remains strong, as we ended the year with cash and investments of $809.9$850.2 million. At December 31, 2014,2015, we had no borrowings outstanding under our five year revolving credit facility, which provides for initial borrowings of up to $125.0 million and can be expanded to $200.0 million.facility.

Assets Under Management

        Assets under management of $104.4 billion on December 31, 2015 decreased $19.3 billion, or 16%, compared to $123.7 billion on December 31, 2014 decreased $2.82014. The decrease in assets under management is due to outflows of $13.8 billion, or 2%, compared to $126.5of which $10.7 billion on December 31, 2013. Outflows of $5.1 billionwas in the Wholesale channel, were partially offset by aggregate net flowsand market depreciation of $1.6 billion in the Advisors and Institutional channels.$5.5 billion.


Table of Contents

Change in Assets Under Management (1)


 Wholesale
Channel
 Advisors
Channel
 Institutional
Channel
 Total  Wholesale
Channel
 Advisors
Channel
 Institutional
Channel
 Total 

 (in millions)
  (in millions)
 

December 31, 2015

         

Beginning Assets

 $60,335 45,517 17,798 123,650 

Sales (2)

 
12,218
 
5,073
 
2,743
 
20,034
 

Redemptions

 (23,686) (5,044) (5,081) (33,811) 

Net Exchanges

 809 (809)   

Net Flows

 (10,659) (780) (2,338) (13,777) 

Market Depreciation

 
(4,035)
 
(1,393)
 
(46)
 
(5,474)
 

Ending Assets

 $45,641 43,344 15,414 104,399 

December 31, 2014

          
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Beginning Assets

 $67,055 43,667 15,821 126,543  $67,055 43,667 15,821 126,543 

Sales (2)

 
18,534
 
5,545
 
3,392
 
27,471
  
18,534
 
5,545
 
3,392
 
27,471
 

Redemptions

 (23,524) (4,575) (2,920) (31,019)  (23,524) (4,575) (2,920) (31,019) 

Net Exchanges

 (101) (384) 485   (101) (384) 485 0 

Net Flows

 (5,091) 586 957 (3,548)  (5,091) 586 957 (3,548) 

Market Appreciation (Depreciation)

 
(1,629)
 
1,264
 
1,020
 
655
 

Market Appreciation

 
(1,629)
 
1,264
 
1,020
 
655
 

Ending Assets

 $60,335 45,517 17,798 123,650  $60,335 45,517 17,798 123,650 

December 31, 2013

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Beginning Assets

 $48,930 35,660 11,775 96,365  $48,930 35,660 11,775 96,365 

Sales (2)

 
21,411
 
5,232
 
3,108
 
29,751
  
21,411
 
5,232
 
3,108
 
29,751
 

Redemptions

 (14,313) (4,304) (2,622) (21,239)  (14,313) (4,304) (2,622) (21,239) 

Net Exchanges

 303 (306)  (3)  303 (306)  (3) 

Net Flows

 7,401 622 486 8,509  7,401 622 486 8,509 

Market Appreciation

 
10,724
 
7,385
 
3,560
 
21,669
  
10,724
 
7,385
 
3,560
 
21,669
 

Ending Assets

 $67,055 43,667 15,821 126,543  $67,055 43,667 15,821 126,543 

December 31, 2012

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Beginning Assets

 $40,954 31,709 10,494 83,157 

Sales (2)

 
15,930
 
4,505
 
2,720
 
23,155
 

Redemptions

 (13,896) (4,156) (2,760) (20,812) 

Net Exchanges

 155 (158)  (3) 

Net Flows

 2,189 191 (40) 2,340 

Market Appreciation

 
5,787
 
3,760
 
1,321
 
10,868
 

Ending Assets

 $48,930 35,660 11,775 96,365 

(1)
Includes all activity of the Funds, the Selector ManagementIGI Funds and institutional and separate accounts, including money market funds and transactions at net asset value, accounts for which we receive no commissions.

(2)
Primarily gross sales (net of sales commission), but also includes net reinvested dividends and capital gains and investment income.

Table of Contents

        Average assets under management, which are generally more indicative of trends in revenue for providing investment management services than the year over year change in ending assets under management, increaseddecreased by 19%10% compared to 2013.2014.

Average Assets Under Management


 2014 2013 2012  2015 2014 2013 

 Average Percentage
of Total
 Average Percentage
of Total
 Average Percentage
of Total
  Average Percentage
of Total
 Average Percentage
of Total
 Average Percentage
of Total
 

 (in millions, except percentage data)
  (in millions, except percentage data)
 

Distribution Channel:

                          

Wholesale Channel

                          

Equity

 $54,563 80% 45,047 80% 37,924 83%  $45,434 82% 54,563 80% 45,047 80% 

Fixed income

 13,203 20% 11,359 20% 7,684 17%  9,848 18% 13,203 20% 11,359 20% 

Money market

 168  184  191   154  168  184  

Total

 $67,934 100% 56,590 100% 45,799 100%  $55,436 100% 67,934 100% 56,590 100% 

Advisors Channel

                          

Equity

 $32,999 74% 28,449 72% 24,227 70%  $33,799 74% 32,999 74% 28,449 72% 

Fixed income

 9,935 22% 9,477 24% 8,933 26%  9,911 22% 9,935 22% 9,477 24% 

Money market

 1,966 4% 1,565 4% 1,318 4%  1,864 4% 1,966 4% 1,565 4% 

Total

 $44,900 100% 39,491 100% 34,478 100%  $45,574 100% 44,900 100% 39,491 100% 

Institutional Channel

                          

Equity

 $16,483 95% 12,433 95% 10,630 93%  $15,440 93% 16,483 95% 12,433 95% 

Fixed income

 824 5% 668 5% 784 7%  1,134 7% 824 5% 668 5% 

Money market

              

Total

 $17,307 100% 13,101 100% 11,414 100%  $16,574 100% 17,307 100% 13,101 100% 

Total by Asset Class:

                          

Equity

 $104,045 80% 85,929 79% 72,781 79%  $94,673 80% 104,045 80% 85,929 79% 

Fixed income

 23,962 18% 21,504 20% 17,401 19%  20,893 18% 23,962 18% 21,504 20% 

Money market

 2,134 2% 1,749 1% 1,509 2%  2,018 2% 2,134 2% 1,749 1% 

Total

 $130,141 100% 109,182 100% 91,691 100%  $117,584 100% 130,141 100% 109,182 100% 

Table of Contents

        The following table summarizes our five largest mutual funds as of December 31, 20142015 by ending assets under management and investment management fees, forwith the last three years.comparative positions in 2014 and 2013. The assets under management and management fees of these mutual funds are presented as a percentage of our total assets under management and total management fees.

Five Largest Mutual Funds by Ending Assets Under Management and Investment Management Fees


 2014 2013 2012  2015 2014 2013 

 Ending Percentage
of Total
 Ending Percentage
of Total
 Ending Percentage
of Total
  Ending Percentage
of Total
 Ending Percentage
of Total
 Ending Percentage
of Total
 

 (in millions, except percentage data)
  (in millions, except percentage data)
 

By Assets Under Management:

                          

Ivy Asset Strategy

 $27,431 22% 34,647 27% 25,981 27%  $15,261 15% 27,431 22% 34,647 27% 

Ivy Science & Technology

 5,921 6% 5,926 5% 4,648 4% 

Ivy High Income

 8,341 7% 10,365 8% 7,228 8%  5,263 5% 8,341 7% 10,365 8% 

Ivy Science & Technology

 5,926 5% 4,648 4% 1,566 2% 

Ivy Mid Cap Growth

 4,966 4% 4,533 4% 2,777 3% 

Ivy International Core Equity

 4,505 4% 2,715 2% 2,005 2% 

Advisors Core Investment

 4,507 3% 4,169 3% 3,067 3%  4,131 4% 4,507 4% 4,169 3% 

Total

 $51,171 41% 58,362 46% 40,619 43%  $35,081 34% 48,920 40% 55,834 44% 



 

(in thousands, except percentage data)


 

 

(in thousands, except percentage data)


 

By Management Fees:

                          

Ivy Asset Strategy

 $189,106 25% 164,372 25% 142,701 26%  $126,688 18% 189,106 25% 164,372 25% 

Ivy Science & Technology

 49,199 7% 43,950 5% 22,949 4% 

Ivy High Income

 54,252 7% 44,095 7% 28,182 5%  37,938 5% 54,252 7% 44,095 7% 

Ivy Science & Technology

 43,950 5% 22,949 4% 11,886 2% 

Ivy Mid Cap Growth

 38,416 5% 30,082 5% 18,607 3%  37,900 5% 38,416 5% 30,082 5% 

Advisors Science & Technology

 30,296 4% 24,500 4% 19,007 3%  31,074 4% 30,296 4% 24,500 4% 

Total

 $356,020 46% 285,998 45% 220,383 39%  $282,799 39% 356,020 46% 285,998 45% 

Results of Operations

Net Income from Continuing Operations

 
 For the Year Ended
December 31,
 Variance 
 
 2014 2013 2012 2014 vs.
2013
 2013 vs.
2012
 
 
 (in thousands, except percentage data)
 

Income from continuing operations

 $313,331  252,998  192,528  24%  31% 

Net income per share from continuing operations, basic and diluted

 $3.71  2.96  2.25  25%  32% 

Operating Margin

  30%  28%  26%  2%  2% 
 
 For the Year Ended
December 31,
 Variance 
 
 2015 2014 2013 2015 vs.
2014
 2014 vs.
2013
 
 
 (in thousands, except per share and percentage data)
 

Net income

 $245,536  313,331  252,998  –22%  24% 

Net income per share, basic and diluted

 $2.94  3.71  2.96  –21%  25% 

Operating Margin

  27%  30%  28%  –3%  2% 

Table of Contents

Total Revenues

        Total revenues increased 17%decreased 5% in 20142015 compared to 2013,2014, attributable to an increasea decrease in average assets under management of 19%, partially offset by10% and a decrease in sales of 8%27%. Total revenues increased 17% in 2013 2014


Table of Contents

compared to 2012,2013, attributable to increases in average assets under management of 19% andpartially offset by a decrease in sales of 28%8%.


 For the Year Ended
December 31,
 Variance  For the Year Ended
December 31,
 Variance 

 2014 2013 2012 2014 vs.
2013
 2013 vs.
2012
  2015 2014 2013 2015 vs.
2014
 2014 vs.
2013
 

 (in thousands, except percentage data)
  (in thousands, except percentage data)
 

Investment management fees

 $768,102 650,442 549,231 18% 18%  $709,562 768,102 650,442 –8% 18% 

Underwriting and distribution fees

 678,678 582,819 496,465 16% 17%  663,998 678,678 582,819 –2% 16% 

Shareholder service fees

 150,979 137,093 128,109 10% 7%  143,071 150,979 137,093 –5% 10% 

Total revenues

 $1,597,759 1,370,354 1,173,805 17% 17%  $1,516,631 1,597,759 1,370,354 –5% 17% 

Investment Management Fee Revenues

        Investment management fee revenues are earned by providing investment advisory services to the Funds, the Selector ManagementIGI Funds and to institutional and separate accounts. Investment management fee revenues decreased $58.5 million, or 8%, in 2015 and increased $117.7 million, or 18%, in 2014 and increased $101.2 million, or 18%, in 2013.2014.

        Investment management fee revenues are based on the level of average assets under management and are affected by sales, financial market conditions, redemptions and the composition of assets. The following graph illustrates the direct relationship between average assets under management and investment management fee revenues for the years ending December 31, 2012, 2013, 2014 and 2014.2015.


Table of Contents

        The following table summarizes investment management fee revenues, related average assets under management, fee waivers and investment management fee rates for the years ending December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013.

 
 For the Year Ended
December 31,
 Variance 
 
 2015 2014 2013 2015 vs.
2014
 2014 vs.
2013
 
 
 (in thousands, except for management fee rate, average assets and percentage data)
 

Retail investment management fees

 $652,494  709,179  602,120  –8%  18% 

Retail average assets (in millions)

  101,010  112,834  96,081  –10%  17% 

Retail management fee rate

  0.6460%  0.6285%  0.6267%       

Money market fee waivers

  
7,239
  
7,844
  
6,486
  
–8%
  
21%
 

Other fee waivers

  3,646  3,958  3,660  –8%  8% 

Total fee waivers

 $10,885  11,802  10,146  –8%  16% 

Institutional investment management fees

 
$

57,068
 
$

58,923
 
$

48,322
  
–3%
  
22%
 

Institutional average assets (in millions)

  16,574  17,307  13,101  –4%  32% 

Institutional management fee rate

  0.3443%  0.3405%  0.3688%       

        Revenues from investment management services provided to our retail mutual funds, which are distributed through the Wholesale, Advisors and Institutional channels, were $709.2decreased $56.7 million in 2014 and2015, or 8%, compared to 2014. Investment management fee revenues decreased at a lesser rate than the related retail average assets in 2015 due to a slight increase in the average management fee rate. Revenues from investment management services provided to our retail mutual funds increased $107.1 million in 2014, or 18%, compared to 2013, while the related retail average assets increased 17%.2013. Investment management fee revenues increased at a greater rate than the related retail average assets in 2014 due


Table of Contents

to a slight increase in the average management fee rate, from 62.7 basis pointsrate. A lower asset base in 2013the Ivy Asset Strategy fund and Ivy High Income fund have resulted in increased management fee rates for both comparative periods, due to 62.9 basis points in 2014.both funds having management fee rates less than our average management fee rate. Management fee waivers which are recorded as an offset of management fees, partially offset the rate of the investment management fee increase. In 2014, we recorded $11.8 million in management fee waivers, of which $7.8 million was related to money market accounts. Revenues from investment management services provided to our retail mutual funds were $602.1 million in 2013 and increased $96.0 million, or 19%, compared to 2012, while the related retail average assets increased 20%. Investment management fee revenues increased at a lesser rate than the related retail average assets due to the effect of recording management fee waivers as an offset to investment management fees. Offees up to the total management fee waivers recorded in 2013amount of $10.1 million, $6.5 million related to money market accounts.fees earned. Retail sales were $17.3 billion, $24.1 billion and $26.6 billion in 2015, 2014 and $20.4 billion in 2014, 2013, and 2012, respectively.

        Institutional and separate account revenues were $58.9in 2015 decreased $1.9 million, $48.3 million and $43.2 million in 2014, 2013 and 2012, respectively. The increase in revenues in 2014or 3%, compared to 2013 was primarily attributable2014 due to a 32% increase4% decrease in average assets under management, while the increase in revenues in 20132014 increased $10.6 million, or 22%, compared to 2012 was2013 due to a result of a 15%32% increase in average assets under management. For the comparative period 2014 to 2013, account revenues increased significantly less than the related average assets under management due to a decline in the average management fee rate driven by a mix-shift of assets into investment styles and account types with lower management fee rates.

 
 Annualized long-term redemption rates
(excludes money market redemptions)
for the year ended December 31,
 
 2015 2014 2013

Wholesale channel

  43.0%  34.8%  25.2%

Advisors channel

  9.1%  8.3%  8.9%

Institutional channel

  30.7%  16.9%  20.0%

Total

  28.3%  23.4%  18.8%

Table of Contents

        InThe increased long-term redemption rate in both comparative periods for the Wholesale channel the long-term redemption rate (which excludes money market fund redemptions) was 34.8% in 2014, compared to 25.2% in 2013 and 30.2% in 2012. The increased rate in 2014 was primarily driven by redemptions in the Ivy Asset Strategy Fund and Ivy High Income Fund.funds. Redemptions in the Asset Strategy and High Income funds comprised over 75% of Wholesale channel redemptions in 2015 and 2014. Prolonged redemptions in the Wholesale channel could negatively affect revenues in future periods. The long-term redemption rate (which excludes money market fund redemptions) in the Advisors channel was 8.3% in 2014 compared to 8.9% and 9.9% in 2013 and 2012, respectively. We expect the Advisors channel long-term redemption rate to remain lower than that of the industry average due to the personal and customized nature in which our financial advisors provide service to our clients by focusing on meeting their long-term financial objectives. The increased long-term redemption rate for our Institutional channel has decreased to 16.9% in 20142015 compared to 20.0%2014 was primarily driven by an institutional account moving from an active core strategy to a smart beta strategy. Also, a large Asset Strategy account with approximately $2.2 billion in 2013 and 24.2%assets under management that we subadvise, has notified us of its intent to recommend to its board a redemption of most of the account's assets in 2012.the middle of 2016. Additionally, an $800.0 million institutional account in our municipal high income strategy is expected to close in 2016. Our overall redemption rate of 28.3% in 2015 is higher than the industry average of 24.7% based on data provided by the ICI.

Underwriting and Distribution

        We earn underwriting and distribution fee revenues primarily by distributing the Funds pursuant to an underwriting agreement with each Fund (except the Ivy Funds VIP as explained below) and, to a lesser extent, by distributing mutual funds offered by other unaffiliated companies. Pursuant to each agreement, we offer and sell the Funds' shares on a continuous basis (open-end funds) and pay certain costs associated with underwriting and distributing the Funds, including the costs of developing and producing sales literature and printing of prospectuses, which may be either partially or fully reimbursed by the Funds. The Funds are sold in various classes that are structured in ways that conform to industry standards (i.e., "front-end load," "back-end load," "level-load" and institutional).

        When a client purchases Class A or Class E shares (front-end load), the client pays an initial sales charge of up to 5.75% of the amount invested. The sales charge for Class A or Class E shares typically declines as the investment amount increases. In addition, investors may combine their purchases of all fund shares to qualify for a reduced sales charge. Class A shares purchased at net asset value are assessed a 1% contingent deferred sales charge ("CDSC") if the shares are redeemed within 12 months of purchase. When a client invests in an asset allocation product, Class A shares are purchased at net asset value and we do not charge an initial sales charge. Although historically investors in our asset allocation products were assessed a CDSC upon early redemption of shares, up to 3% of the amount originally invested and declining to zero for investments held more than three years, effective for purchases made beginning June 16, 2014, we no longer assess a CDSC to investors upon early redemption. For client purchases of Class B shares (back-end load) prior to January 1, 2014, we do not charge an initial sales charge, but we do charge a CDSC upon early redemption of shares, up to 5% of the lesser of the current market net asset


Table of Contents

value or the purchase cost of the redeemed shares in the first year and declining to zero for shares held for more than six years. Class B shares convert to Class A shares after seven years. Effective January 1, 2014, the Company suspended sales of Class B shares. When a client purchases Class C shares (level-load), we do not charge an initial sales charge, but we do charge investors who redeem their Class C shares in the first year a CDSC of 1% of the current market net asset value or the purchase cost of the shares redeemed, whichever is less.

        Under a Rule 12b-1 service plan, the Funds may charge a maximum fee of 0.25% of the average daily net assets under management for Class B, C, E and Ivy Funds Y shares for expenses paid to broker/dealers and other sales professionals in connection with providing ongoing services to the Funds' shareholders and/or maintaining the Funds' shareholder accounts, with the exception of the Funds' Class R shares, for which the maximum fee is 0.50% and for the Class I, R6 and Advisors Funds Y shares, which do not charge a service fee. The Funds' Class B and Class C shares may charge a maximum of 0.75% of the average daily net assets under management under a Rule 12b-1 distribution plan to broker/dealers and other sales professionals for their services in connection with distributing shares of that class. The Funds' Class A shares may charge a maximum fee of 0.25% of the average daily net assets under management under a Rule 12b-1 service and distribution plan for expenses detailed previously. The Rule 12b-1 plans are subject to annual approval by the Funds' board of trustees, including a majority of the disinterested members, by votes cast in person at a meeting called for the purpose of voting on such approval. All Funds may terminate the service plan at any time with approval of fund trustees or portfolio shareholders (a majority of either) without penalty.

We offer fee-based asset allocation investment advisory products that utilize our Funds. These products offer clients a selection of traditional asset allocation models, as well as features such as systematic rebalancing and client and advisor participation in determining asset allocation across asset classes. We earn asset-based fees on our asset allocation products. In connection with Project E, we intend to convert the load-waived Class A shares currently offered in our investment advisory products.programs to institutional share classes, which do not charge a Rule 12b-1 fee. As a result, we will no longer collect Rule 12b-1 asset-based service and distribution fee revenue on these assets under management, which will reduce our pre-tax operating income by an estimated $8.0 million in 2016, net of underwriting and distribution expenses.

        We distribute variable products offering the Ivy Funds VIP as investment vehicles pursuant to general agency arrangements with our business partners and receive commissions, marketing allowances and other compensation as stipulated by such agreements. In connection with these arrangements, the Ivy Funds VIP are offered and sold on a continuous basis.

        In addition to distributing variable products, we distribute a number of other insurance products through our insurance agency subsidiary, including individual term life, group term life, whole life, accident and health, long-term care, Medicare supplement and disability insurance. We receive commissions and compensation from various underwriters for distributing these products. We are not an underwriter for any insurance policies.


Table of Contents

Underwriting and Distribution Fee Revenues and Expenses

        The following tables illustrate our underwriting and distribution fee revenues and expenses segregated by distribution channel for the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 2013 and 2012:2013:


 Total  
  
  Total  
  
 

 2014 vs.
2013
 2013 vs.
2012
  2015 vs.
2014
 2014 vs.
2013
 

 2014 2013 2012  2015 2014 2013 

 (in thousands, except percentage data)
  (in thousands, except percentage data)
 

Revenues

 $678,678 582,819 496,465 16% 17%  $663,998 678,678 582,819 –2% 16% 

Expenses—Direct

 (615,954) (524,071) (444,854) 18% 18%  (589,810) (615,954) (524,071) –4% 18% 

Expenses—Indirect

 (167,373) (152,642) (145,127) 10% 5%  (179,971) (167,373) (152,642) 8% 10% 

Net Distribution (Costs)/Excess

 $(104,649) (93,894) (93,516) –11% 0%  $(105,783) (104,649) (93,894) –1% –11% 

 


 Wholesale Channel  
  
  Wholesale Channel  
  
 

 2014 vs.
2013
 2013 vs.
2012
  2015 vs.
2014
 2014 vs.
2013
 

 2014 2013 2012  2015 2014 2013 

Revenues

 $234,939 207,419 178,700 13% 16%  $194,041 234,939 207,419 –17% 13% 

Expenses—Direct

 (302,459) (268,047) (224,744) 13% 19%  (254,778) (302,459) (268,047) –16% 13% 

Expenses—Indirect

 (51,675) (43,923) (39,929) 18% 10%  (55,944) (51,675) (43,923) 8% 18% 

Net Distribution (Costs)/Excess

 $(119,195) (104,551) (85,973) –14% –22%  $(116,681) (119,195) (104,551) 2% –14% 

 


 Advisors Channel  
  
 

 2014 vs.
2013
 2013 vs.
2012
  Advisors Channel  
  
 

 2014 2013 2012  2015 2014 2013 2015 vs. 2014 2014 vs. 2013 

Revenues

 $443,739 375,400 317,765 18% 18%  $469,957 443,739 375,400 6% 18% 

Expenses—Direct

 (313,495) (256,024) (220,110) 22% 16%  (335,032) (313,495) (256,024) 7% 22% 

Expenses—Indirect

 (115,698) (108,719) (105,198) 6% 3%  (124,027) (115,698) (108,719) 7% 6% 

Net Distribution (Costs)/Excess

 $14,546 10,657 (7,543) 36% 241%  $10,898 14,546 10,657 –25% 36% 

Table of Contents

        The following tables summarize the significant components of underwriting and distribution fee revenues segregated by distribution channel for the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 2013 and 2012:2013:

 
 Total
 
 2014 2013 2012
 
 (in thousands)

Underwriting and distribution fee revenues:

         

Rule 12b-1 service and distribution fees

 $346,304  304,659  264,192

Fee-based asset allocation product revenues

  202,178  155,501  116,407

Sales commissions on front-end load mutual fund and variable annuity sales

  78,484  75,008  70,996

Sales commissions on other products

  24,024  22,069  23,198

Other revenues

  27,688  25,582  21,672

Total

 $678,678  582,819  496,465


 
 Wholesale Channel
 
 2014 2013 2012
 
 (in thousands)

Underwriting and distribution fee revenues:

         

Rule 12b-1 service and distribution fees

 $224,669  198,283  170,799

Sales commissions on front-end load mutual fund sales

  5,843  5,506  3,989

Other revenues

  4,427  3,630  3,912

Total

 $234,939  207,419  178,700



 Advisors Channel Total

 2014 2013 2012 2015 2014 2013

 (in thousands)
 (in thousands)

Underwriting and distribution fee revenues:

            

Rule 12b-1 service and distribution fees

 $121,635 106,376 93,393 $309,279 346,304 304,659

Fee-based asset allocation product revenues

 202,178 155,501 116,407 224,918 202,178 155,501

Sales commissions on front-end load mutual fund and variable annuity sales

 72,641 69,502 67,007 78,923 78,484 75,008

Sales commissions on other products

 24,024 22,069 23,198 24,096 24,024 22,069

Other revenues

 23,261 21,952 17,760 26,782 27,688 25,582

Total

 $443,739 375,400 317,765 $663,998 678,678 582,819

Table of Contents


 
 Wholesale Channel
 
 2015 2014 2013
 
 (in thousands)

Underwriting and distribution fee revenues:

         

Rule 12b-1 service and distribution fees

 $186,994  224,669  198,283

Sales commissions on front-end load mutual fund sales

  3,091  5,843  5,506

Other revenues

  3,956  4,427  3,630

Total

 $194,041  234,939  207,419


 
 Advisors Channel
 
 2015 2014 2013
 
 (in thousands)

Underwriting and distribution fee revenues:

         

Rule 12b-1 service and distribution fees

 $122,285  121,635  106,376

Fee-based asset allocation product revenues

  224,918  202,178  155,501

Sales commissions on front-end load mutual fund and variable annuity sales

  75,832  72,641  69,502

Sales commissions on other products

  24,096  24,024  22,069

Other revenues

  22,826  23,261  21,952

Total

 $469,957  443,739  375,400

        A significant portion of underwriting and distribution revenues are received from Rule 12b-1 asset-based service and distribution fees earned on load, load-waived and deferred-load products sold by our financial advisors and third party intermediaries. Underwriting and distribution revenues also include asset-based fees earned on our asset allocation products and commissions, sales commissions charged on front-end load products sold by our financial advisors, including mutual fund Class A shares (those sponsored by the Company and those underwritten by other non-proprietary mutual fund companies), variable annuities, sales of other insurance products, and financial planning fees. A significant amount of Wholesale channel mutual fund sales are load-waived.

        We divide the costs of underwriting and distribution into two components—direct costs and indirect costs. Direct selling costs fluctuate with sales volume, such as advisor commissions and management commissions paid to field management, advisor incentive compensation, commissions paid to third parties and to our own wholesalers, and related management commissions in our Wholesale channel. Direct selling costs also fluctuate with assets under management, such as Rule 12b-1 service and distribution fees paid to third parties. Indirect selling costs are fixed costs that do not necessarily fluctuate with sales levels. Indirect costs include expenses incurred by our home office and field offices such as wholesaler salaries, marketing costs, promotion and distribution of our products through the Wholesale and Advisors channels; support and management of our financial advisors such as field office overhead, sales programs and technology infrastructure; and costs of managing and supporting our wholesale efforts through technology infrastructure and personnel. While the Institutional channel does have marketing expenses, those expenses are accounted for in compensation and related costs and general and administrative expense instead of underwriting and distribution because of the channel's integration with our investment management division, its relatively small size and the fact that there are no Rule 12b-1 service and distribution fees, loads, CDSCs,contingent deferred sales charges ("CDSCs"), or any other charges to separate account clients except investment management fees.

        We recover certain of our underwriting and distribution costs through Rule 12b-1 service and distribution fees, which are paid by the Funds. All Rule 12b-1 service and distribution fee revenue received from the Funds is recorded on a gross basis.


Table of Contents

        Underwriting and distribution revenues earned in 2014 increased2015 decreased by $95.9$14.7 million, or 16%2%, compared to 2013.2014. Rule 12b-1 asset based service and distribution fees increased $41.6decreased $37.0 million, or 14%11%, year over year, driven by a 15% increasedecrease in average mutual fund assets under management for which we earn Rule 12b-1 revenues. Approximately 75% of Rule 12b-1 revenues earned are a pass-through to direct underwriting and distribution expenses. Revenues from fee-based asset allocation products continued to be a meaningful contributor to revenues, increasing to 48% of Advisors channel underwriting and distribution revenues in 2015 compared to 46% in 2014. Fee-based asset allocation assets grew from $17.3 billion at December 31, 2014 to $17.6 billion at December 31, 2015, generating an increase of fee-based asset allocation revenue of $22.7 million, or 11%, as advisors increasingly utilize fee-based programs for their clients.

        Underwriting and distribution revenues earned in 2014 increased by $95.9 million, or 16%, compared to 2013. Increased Rule 12b-1 asset-based service and distribution fees of $41.6 million, or 14%, resulted from the increase in average mutual fund assets under management for which we earn Rule 12b-1 revenues. Revenues from fee-based asset allocation products increased to 46% of Advisors channel underwriting and distribution revenues in 2014 compared to 41% in 2013. Fee-based asset allocation assets grew from $14.4 billion at December 31, 2013 to $17.3 billion at December 31, 2014, generating an increase of fee-based asset allocation revenue of $46.7 million, or 30%, as advisors increasingly utilize fee-based programs for their clients..

        Underwriting and distribution revenues earnedexpenses in 2013 increased2015 decreased by $86.4$13.5 million, or 17%2%, compared to 2012. Increased2014. Direct expenses in the Wholesale channel decreased $47.7 million compared to 2014 as a result of a decrease in average wholesale assets under management and lower sales volume year over year, which resulted in lower dealer compensation, wholesaler commissions and Rule 12b-1 asset-based service and distribution fees of $40.5expenses paid to third party distributors. Direct expenses in the Advisors channel grew in relation to revenue, offsetting the decrease in the Wholesale Channel. Indirect expenses across both channels increased $12.6 million, or 15%8%, resulted from the 17% increase in average mutual fund assets under management for which we earn Rule 12b-1 revenues. Revenues from fee-based asset allocation products increased to 41% of Advisors channel underwriting and distribution revenues in 2013 compared to 37% in 2012. Fee-based asset allocation assets grew from $10.1 billion at December 31, 20122014, primarily due to $14.4 billion at December 31, 2013, generating an increase of fee-based asset allocation revenue of $39.1 million, or 34%.increased employee compensation and benefits, consulting expenses, rent expense and advertising expenses, partially offset by lower computer services and software expenses.

        Underwriting and distribution expenses in 2014 increased by $106.6 million, or 16%, compared to 2013. Direct expenses in the Wholesale channel increased $34.4 million compared to 2013 as a result of an increase in average wholesale assets under management, partially offset by lower sales volume year over year. We incurred higher Rule 12b-1 asset-based service and distribution expenses paid to third party distributors, partially offset by lower dealer compensation. Direct expenses in the Advisors channel grew


Table of Contents

faster than revenue due to increased advisor payouts, as a result of a change in the AdvisorAdvisors compensation plan. Indirect expenses across both channels increased $14.7 million, or 10%, compared to 2013, primarily due to increased computer services and software expenses, employee compensation and benefits and marketing expenses.

        Underwriting and distribution expenses in 2013 increased by $86.7 million, or 15%, compared to 2012. Direct expenses in the Wholesale channel increased $43.3 million compared to 2012 as a result of an increase in average wholesale assets under management and higher sales volume year over year. We incurred higher dealer compensation, increased Rule 12b-1 asset-based service and distribution expenses paid to third party distributors and higher wholesaler commissions. Direct expenses in the Advisors channel increased $35.9 million, or 16%, due to increased commissions related to the sale of fee-based asset allocation products and increased Rule 12b-1 asset-based service and distribution expenses. Across both channels, indirect expenses increased $7.5 million, or 5%, compared to 2012, primarily due to increased computer services and software expenses, marketing expenses, group health costs and sales convention expenses, partially offset by lower costs in 2013 associated with our electronic books and records conversion project.

Shareholder Service Fees Revenue

        Shareholder service fee revenue primarily includes transfer agency fees, custodian fees from retirement plan accounts, and portfolio accounting and administration fees. Transfer agency fees and portfolio accounting and administration fees are asset-based revenues or account-based revenues, while custodian fees from retirement plan accounts are based on the number of client accounts. The share conversion from load-waived Class A shares to institutional share classes, which do not charge a Rule 12b-1 fee, offered in our investment advisory programs will result in lower shareholder service fee revenue in 2016. Certain transfer agency fees for institutional share classes are asset-based and maintain lower revenue rates compared to account-based transfer agency fees. Shareholder service fee revenue will decline following the share class conversion in 2016 and will result in lower revenue rates compared to account-based transfer agency fees. Based on the composition of accounts and relative balances as of December 31, 2015, shareholder service fee revenue is expected to decline approximately $8.0 million in 2016.


Table of Contents

        During 2015, shareholder service fees revenue decreased $7.9 million, or 5%, over 2014. Of the total decrease, asset-based fees accounted for $8.1 million, partially offset by an increase in account-based fees. A majority of the decrease in asset-based fees was driven by fees for the I, Y, R and R6 share classes which decreased $8.4 million, or 18%, when compared to 2014. Assets in the I, Y, R and R6 share classes declined from an average of $31.0 billion at December 31, 2014 to an average of $25.6 billion at December 31, 2015, representing a decrease of 17%.

        During 2014, shareholder service fees revenue increased $13.9 million, or 10%, over 2013. Of the total increase, asset-based fees accounted for $11.5 million and account-based fees increased $2.7 million, partially offset by a decrease in retirement plan fees. A majority of the increase in asset-based fees was driven by fees for the I, Y and R share classes, which increased $10.8 million, or 30%, when compared to 2013. Assets in the I, Y and R share classes grew from an average of $23.8 billion at December 31, 2013 to an average of $31.0 billion at December 31, 2014, representing an increase of 30%. The account-based fees increase of $2.7 million was due to a 2% increase in the number of accounts compared to the same period.

        During 2013, shareholder service fees revenue increased $9.0 million, or 7%, over 2012. The increase is due to higher asset-based fees of $9.6 million year over year. Of the increase in asset-based fees, fees for the I, Y and R share classes increased $8.7 million, or 32%, when compared to 2012. Assets in the I, Y and R shares classes grew from an average of $18.1 billion in 2012 to an average of $23.8 billion in 2013, representing an increase of 31%. The increase in asset-based fees was partially offset by lower account-based fees, due to a decrease in technology reimbursements from the Funds. The decrease in technology reimbursement was a result of favorable pricing received on the renewal of a vendor contract effective at the beginning of 2013, and also resulted in lower general and administrative expenses for the year.

Total Operating Expenses

        Operating expenses decreased $12.6 million, or 1%, in 2015 compared to 2014 primarily due to decreased underwriting and distribution expenses, as well as a $7.9 million intangible asset impairment charge recorded in 2014, partially offset by increased compensation and related costs. Underwriting and distribution expenses are discussed above.

        Operating expenses increased $127.6 million, or 13%, in 2014 compared to 2013 primarily due to increased underwriting and distribution expenses, increased general and administrative costs and an intangible asset impairment charge, partially offset by decreased subadvisory fees. Underwriting and distribution expenses are discussed above.


Table of Contents

        Operating expenses increased $114.5 million, or 13%, in 2013 compared to 2012 primarily due to increased underwriting and distribution expenses and compensation and related costs, partially offset by decreased subadvisory fees.


 For the Year Ended
December 31,
 Variance For the Year Ended
December 31,
 Variance

 2014 2013 2012 2014 vs.
2013
 2013 vs.
2012
 2015 2014 2013 2015 vs.
2014
 2014 vs.
2013

 (in thousands, except percentage data)
 (in thousands, except percentage data)

Underwriting and distribution

 $783,327 676,713 589,981 16% 15% $769,781 783,327 676,713 –2% 16%

Compensation and related costs

 194,410 197,597 171,775 –2% 15% 200,752 194,410 197,597 3% –2%

General and administrative

 104,637 86,419 75,332 21% 15% 105,066 104,637 86,419 0% 21%

Subadvisory fees

 8,436 12,220 21,009 –31% –42% 9,134 8,436 12,220 8% –31%

Depreciation

 14,634 12,834 13,211 14% –3% 16,046 14,634 12,834 10% 14%

Intangible asset impairment

 7,900   NM NM  7,900  NM NM

Total operating expenses

 $1,113,344 985,783 871,308 13% 13% $1,100,779 1,113,344 985,783 –1% 13%

Compensation and Related Costs


 For the Year Ended
December 31,
 Variance For the Year Ended
December 31,
 Variance

 2014 2013 2012 2014 vs.
2013
 2013 vs.
2012
 2015 2014 2013 2015 vs.
2014
 2014 vs.
2013

 (in thousands, except percentage data)
 (in thousands, except percentage data)

Compensation and related costs

 $194,410 197,597 171,775 –2% 15% $200,752 194,410 197,597 3% –2%

As a percent of revenue

 12% 14% 15% –2% –1% 13% 12% 14% 1% –2%

        Compensation and related costs in 2015 increased $6.3 million, or 3%, compared to 2014. An increase in base salaries of $5.3 million due to an increase in headcount and annual merit raises, and an increase in pension expense of $3.3 million were the primary drivers. Expense also increased $1.5 million related to incentive compensation, increased $1.4 million related to our deferred compensation program for portfolio


Table of Contents

managers, and increased $1.3 million related to miscellaneous compensation. Partially offsetting these increases was a decrease in share-based compensation of $6.6 million due to forfeitures and lower non-employee expense.

        Compensation and related costs in 2014 decreased $3.2 million, or 2%, compared to 2013. A decrease in incentive compensation of $6.1 million and a decrease in pension expense of $3.6 million were the primary drivers. Expense also decreased $2.3 million related to our deferred compensation program for portfolio managers due to market depreciation. Partially offsetting these decreases were an increase in base salaries, payroll taxes and savings plan costs of $5.7 million due to an increase in headcount and annual merit increases during 2014, and an increase in share-based compensation of $1.0 million due to higher amortization expense associated with our nonvested restricted stock. In addition, higher compensation costs related to Institutional channel marketing contributed $0.8 million compared to 2013 and group insurance expense increased $0.5 million due to unfavorable claims experience.

        Compensation and related costs in 2013 increased $25.8 million, or 15%, compared to 2012. An incentive compensation expense increase of $12.9 million was the primary driver. Base salaries and payroll taxes contributed $6.7 million to the increase due to an increase in average headcount of 3% and annual merit increases during 2013. Share-based compensation increased $4.4 million compared to 2012 primarily due to higher amortization expense associated with our nonvested restricted stock. Group insurance costs increased $1.1 million year over year based on unfavorable claims experience.


Table of Contents

General and Administrative Expenses


 For the Year Ended
December 31,
 Variance For the Year Ended
December 31,
 Variance

 2014 2013 2012 2014 vs.
2013
 2013 vs.
2012
 2015 2014 2013 2015 vs.
2014
 2014 vs.
2013

 (in thousands, except percentage data)
 (in thousands, except percentage data)

General and administrative expenses

 $104,637 86,419 75,332 21% 15% $105,066 104,637 86,419 0% 21%

As a percent of revenue

 7% 6% 6% 1% 0% 7% 7% 6% 0% 1%

        General and administrative expenses are operating costs other than those related to compensation and to distribution efforts, including, but not limited to, computer services and software costs, telecommunications, facilities costs of our home offices, costs of professional services including legal and accounting, and insurance.

        General and administrative expenses increased $0.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2015 compared to 2014. Technology consulting expenses and computer services and software costs increased $8.7 million related to the implementation of technology infrastructure initiatives. Offsetting these increases were lower consulting costs of $3.1 million, lower temporary office staff expense of $2.6 million, lower shareholder adjustments of $1.2 million and lower dealer service costs of $1.2 million. A majority of dealer service costs represent pass-through account servicing costs to third party dealers and are based on lower asset levels in certain share classes.

        General and administrative expenses increased $18.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2014 compared to 2013. Included in 2013 were one-time structuring, offering and organizational costs for the launch of the Ivy High Income Opportunities Fundfund in the amount of $6.7 million. Excluding these charges in 2013, general and administrative expenses increased $24.9 million, due primarily to higher consulting costs of $8.7 million, of which $5.7 million is related to technology consulting, increased dealer service costs based on higher asset levels in certain share classes of $5.4 million, higher computer services and software costs of $4.0 million and increased legal, temporary office staff and fund expense costs. We anticipate that computer services and software expenses may increase in 2015 based on our current technology initiatives.

        General and administrative expenses increased $11.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2013 compared to 2012. During 2012, we recorded a charge of $5.0 million to reflect the impairment of certain capitalized software development costs. Also included in 2012 was an adjustment to lower general and administrative expenses by $3.5 million to reflect lower estimated costs of distributing an SEC market timing settlement dating back to 2006, and a reduction in the estimated legal costs related to an ongoing class action suit. Excluding these charges in 2012 and the fund launch costs in 2013, general and administrative expenses increased $5.9 million, due primarily to increased dealer service costs based on higher asset levels in certain share classes of $5.0 million, higher national branding campaign expenses and temporary office staff costs. Partially offsetting these increases were lower computer services and software expenses and legal costs.

Subadvisory Fees

        Subadvisory fees represent fees paid to other asset managers for providing advisory services for certain mutual fund portfolios. These expenses reduce our operating margin since we pay out approximately half of our management fee revenues received from subadvised products. Gross management fee revenues for products subadvised by others were $15.9$16.3 million for the year ended December 31, 20142015 compared to $15.9 million and $24.0 million for 2014 and $41.7 million for 2013, and 2012, respectively, due to a 14% increase in average assets from 2014 to 2015 and a 24% decrease in average assets from 2013 to 2014 and2014.


Table of Contents

Gross management fee revenues for subadvised products in 2015 increased at a 40%lesser rate than the related average net assets under management due to a decrease in the average assets from 2012 to 2013.management fee rate. The decrease in average net assets for both periodsfrom 2013 to 2014 is a result of internalizing the management of the Global Natural Resources funds after the portfolio manager's retirement from Mackenzie Financial Corporation ("MFC"), the subadvisor, during the third quarter of 2013. Subadvisory expenses in 2015 increased in relation to gross management fee revenues due to termination fees related to internalizing management of the Micro Cap Growth funds as of June 30, 2015. Subadvisory expenses followed the same pattern as gross management fee revenues for the past three years.2014 and 2013.

Intangible Asset Impairment

        During the third quarter of 2014, we recorded an intangible asset impairment charge of $7.9 million related to our subadvisory agreement to manage certain mutual fund products for MFC recorded in


Table of Contents

connection with our purchase of Mackenzie Investment Management, Inc. in 2002. The impairment charge was a result of a decline in assets under management attributable to a realignment of MFC's fund offerings and additional asset reductions. It is possible that the assets we manage for MFC may decrease in the future, which would require us to assess the need for an additional write-down of the intangible asset associated with our subadvisory agreement with MFC.

        At December 31, 2014,2015, the remaining balance of our subadvisory intangible asset was $8.4 million. The deferred tax liability established as a part of purchase accounting related to this intangible asset was $3.1 million as of December 31, 2014.2015.

Other Income and Expenses

Investment and Other Income

        Investment and other income decreased $22.0 million in 2015 compared to 2014. The majority of the decrease is related to mark-to-market activity on sponsored funds (Advisors Funds, Ivy Funds and IGI Funds) held as equity method investments and sponsored funds held as trading in our investment portfolio. We recorded mark-to-market losses of $15.4 million in 2015, compared to mark-to-market gains of $2.4 million in 2014. Realized gains on the sale of available for sale sponsored funds decreased $2.2 million in 2015 compared to 2014. Sponsored fund dividend income and capital gain distributions decreased $1.0 million in 2015, compared to 2014.

        Investment and other income decreased $3.1 million in 2014 compared to 2013, primarily due to a $9.3 million decrease in realized gains on the sale of available for sale affiliatedsponsored funds (mutual funds and UCITS sub-funds) and a $1.5 million decrease in mark-to-market gains on affiliatedsponsored fund holdings in our trading portfolio. A $3.0 million increase in affiliatedsponsored fund dividend income and capital gain distributions partially offset the decrease. In 2013, we recorded losses related to our investment in a limited partnership of $4.9 million.

        Investment and other income increased $10.1 million in 2013 compared to 2012, primarily due to an $11.6 million increase in realized gains on the sale of available for sale affiliated funds and a $2.7 million increase in affiliated fund dividend income. A $2.9 million increase in partnership losses and a $0.9 million decrease in mark-to-market gains on affiliated fund holdings in our trading portfolio partially offset the increase.

Interest Expense

        Interest expense was $11.1 million, $11.0 million and $11.2 million in 2015, 2014 and $11.3 million in 2014, 2013, and 2012, respectively. Although the majority of our interest expense is fixed based on our $190.0 million senior unsecured notes, we did benefit from lower costs associated with the renewal of our credit facility in 2013.

Income Taxes

        Our effective income tax rate from continuing operations was 36.1%38.5%, 36.1% and 35.7% in 2015, 2014 and 36.0% in 2014, 2013, and 2012, respectively. The Company sold Legend in 2013, which generated a capital loss available to offset potential future capital gains. Due to the character of the losslosses and the limited carryforward period permitted by law, a valuation allowance was recorded on a portion of this capital loss. During 2015, unrealized losses on equity method investments and the trading securities portfolio increased the valuation allowance. These losses were partially offset by capital gain distributions from investments and realized capital gains on the sale of securities in the Company's investment portfolios. Overall, the losses in excess


Table of Contents

of gains resulted in an increase in the valuation allowance that was recorded as a charge to income tax expense of $3.7 million, which increased our effective income tax rate. During 2014 2013 and 2012,2013, realized capital gains allowed for a release of the valuation allowance of $5.0 million, and $7.2 million, and $2.3 million, respectively. In each year, this release of the valuation allowance was recorded as a reduction to income tax expense and, as a result, decreased ourThe higher effective tax rate.rate in 2015 as compared to 2014 was primarily the result of investment losses in 2015 as compared to investment gains in 2014. The higher effective tax rate in 2014 as compared to 2013 was primarily the result of lower investment gains in 2014. Likewise, the lower effective tax rate in 2013 as compared to 2012 was primarily the result of additional utilization of capital losses in 2013.

        Our 2015, 2014 2013 and 20122013 effective tax rates from continuing operations, removing the effects of the valuation allowance, would have been 37.6%, 37.1%, 37.5% and 36.8%37.5%, respectively. The effective income tax rate, exclusive of the valuation allowance, increased in 2015 as compared to 2014 due to increases in expenses that are not deductible for income tax purposes as well as lower income before taxes in 2015, which increases the impact of nondeductible expenses. The effective income tax rate, exclusive of the valuation allowance, decreased in 2014 as compared to 2013 due to higher income before taxes, which diluted the impact of expenses that are not deductible for income tax purposes. Additionally, the Company generated larger state tax incentives related to capital expenditures made by the Company in 2014 as compared to 2013. When the statute of limitations lapses and a tax year is no longer subject to potential future audit, the Company recognizes any tax benefits previously considered uncertain related to that tax year. The 2013 effective income tax rate, exclusive of the valuation allowance, increased as compared to 2012 due to less recognition of tax benefits as a result of the lapse of the statute of limitations. Also in 2012, the Company identified favorable treatment on expenses previously considered nondeductible for income tax purposes, thereby generating tax refunds related to the 2009 and 2010 tax years.


Table of Contents

Liquidity and Capital Resources

        The following table summarizes certain key financial data relating to our liquidity and capital resources:

 
 For the Year Ended
December 31,
 Variance 
 
 2014 vs.
2013
 2013 vs.
2012
 
 
 2014 2013 2012 
 
 (in thousands, except percentage data)
 

Balance Sheet Data: (1)

                

Cash and cash equivalents

 $566,621  487,845  328,027  16%  49% 

Cash and cash equivalents—restricted

  76,595  121,419  92,980  –37%  31% 

Investment securities

  243,283  201,348  176,142  21%  14% 

Long-term debt

  
190,000
  
190,000
  
190,000
  
0%
  
0%
 

Cash Flow Data:

  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
 

Cash flows from operating activities

  345,042  286,916  233,435  20%  23% 

Cash flows from investing activities

  (39,108)  25,622  (17,129)  –253%  –250% 

Cash flows from financing activities

  (227,158)  (155,023)  (213,059)  –47%  27% 

(1)
Balance sheet data excludes discontinued operations held for sale for 2012.
 
 For the Year Ended
December 31,
 Variance 
 
 2015 vs.
2014
 2014 vs.
2013
 
 
 2015 2014 2013 
 
 (in thousands, except percentage data)
 

Balance Sheet Data:

                

Cash and cash equivalents

 $558,495  566,621  487,845  –1%  16% 

Cash and cash equivalents—restricted

  66,880  76,595  121,419  –13%  –37% 

Investment securities

  291,743  243,283  201,348  20%  21% 

Long-term debt

  
190,000
  
190,000
  
190,000
  
0%
  
0%
 

Cash Flow Data:

  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
 

Cash flows from operating activities

  233,950  345,042  286,916  –32%  20% 

Cash flows from investing activities

  (22,595)  (39,108)  25,622  –42%  –253% 

Cash flows from financing activities

  (219,481)  (227,158)  (155,023)  3%  –47% 

        Our operations provide much of the cash necessary to fund our priorities, as follows:

Finance Internal Growth

        We use cash to fund growth in our distribution channels. Our Wholesale channel requires cash outlays for wholesaler commissions and commissions to third parties on deferred load product sales. We continue to invest in our Advisors channel by providing additional support to our advisors throughoffering home office resources, wholesaling efforts and enhanced technology tools.tools, including the modernization of our brokerage and product platform associated with Project E. Across both channels, we provide seed money for new products.


        We are currently investing in technology initiatives to modernize and optimize our technology environment. Initiatives underway include upgrading our infrastructure, network and security, moving to distributed applications, and building system architecture.

Table of Contents

Pay Dividends

        The Board of Directors approved an increase in the quarterly dividend on our common stock from $0.34$0.43 per share to $0.43$0.46 per share beginning with the dividend we declared in the fourth quarter 20142015 and paid on February 2, 20151, 2016 to stockholders of record on January 12, 2015. We paid a special cash dividend on our common stock of $1.00 per share in 2012.11, 2016. Dividends on our common stock resulted in financing cash outflows of $144.0 million, $115.3 million and $96.0 million in 2015, 2014 and $171.3 million in 2014, 2013, and 2012, respectively.

Repurchase Our Stock

        In 2014,2015, we purchased 2.32.0 million shares of our common stock, compared to 2.3 million shares and 1.5 million shares in both2014 and 2013, and 2012.respectively. These share repurchase amounts included 432,353 shares, 599,340 shares 665,035 shares and 568,568665,035 shares from employees who elected to tender shares to cover their minimum tax withholdings with respect to vesting of stock awards during the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013, and 2012, respectively.


Table of Contents

        In the future, we plan to repurchase shares, at a minimum, to offset dilution from shares issued for employee stock-based compensation programs. During 2015,2016, we estimate that we will repurchase approximately 500 thousand400,000 shares from employees who elect to tender shares to cover their minimum tax withholdings arising from the vesting of nonvested shares.

Operating Cash Flows

        Cash from operations is our primary source of funds and increased $58.1decreased $111.1 million from 20132014 to 2014.2015. The increasedecrease is primarily due to increaseda decrease in net income comparedof $67.8 million in 2015, increased purchases of trading securities of $36.5 million and an increase in other assets of $19.5 million, partially offset by a net decrease in deferred sales commission payments related to the prior year.deferred sales load and fee based products of $8.8 million in 2015.

        The payable to investment companies for securities, payable to customers and other receivables accounts can fluctuate significantly based on trading activity at the end of a reporting period. Changes in these accounts result in variances within cash from operations on the statement of cash flows; however, there is no impact to the Company's liquidity and operations for the variances in these accounts.

        During 2014,2015, we paid our financial advisors and third parties upfront commissions on the sale of Class C shares and certain fee-based asset allocation products. Effective January 1, 2014, we suspended sales of Class B shares, but prior to that date, we paid upfront commissions on Class B shares as well. Funding of such commissions during the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013 and 2012 totaled $10.9 million, $41.0 million $68.5 million and $54.4$68.5 million, respectively. In 2014, 57%2015, 100% of the commission funding was related to Class C shares and 43% of theshares. During 2014, commission funding was related to fee-based asset allocation products. During 2013, commission funding for Class C Shares and fee-based asset allocation products was 57% and Class C shares was 54% and 36%43% of the annual commission funding, respectively. In 2012, 51%2013, 54% of the commission funding was related to fee-based asset allocation products and 35%36% was related to Class C shares. Based on changesWe continue to the advisor compensation plan in the second quarter of 2014, we expect payment of upfront fund commission for certain fee-based asset allocation products will decline in future periods.

        A contribution of $20.0 million was made to our pension plan in January 2015,2016, and no further contributions are planned for 2015.2016.

        In connection with Project E strategic initiatives and the share class conversion, which are expected to reduce operating revenue by approximately $29.0 million in 2016, we will undertake significant cost reduction efforts to reduce fixed costs by approximately 10%, or $40.0 million, on our annual run-rate basis over the next 12 - 18 months, with a goal to realize approximately two-thirds of the reduction in 2016.


Table of Contents

Investing Cash Flows

        Investing activities consist primarily of the purchaseseeding and sale of available for salesponsored investment securities, as well as capital expenditures. We expect our 20152016 capital expenditures to be in the range of $20.0$15.0 to $30.0$25.0 million.

Financing Cash Flows

        As noted previously, dividends and stock repurchases accounted for a majority of our financing cash outflows in 2014.2015.

        On August 31, 2010, the Company entered into an agreement to complete a $190.0 million private placement of senior unsecured notes that were issued and sold in two tranches: $95.0 million bearing interest at 5.0% and maturing January 13, 2018, Series A, and $95.0 million bearing interest of 5.75% and maturing January 13, 2021, Series B (collectively, the "Senior Notes"). The agreement contained a delayed funding provision that allowed the Company to draw down the proceeds in January 2011 when the 5.6% senior notes (the "Notes") matured. The Company used the proceeds of the issuance and sale of the Senior Notes to repay the Notes in full. Interest is payable semi-annually in January and July of each year. The most restrictive provisions of the agreement require the Company to maintain a consolidated leverage ratio not to exceed 3.0 to 1.0 for four consecutive quarters and a consolidated interest coverage ratio of not less than 4.0 to 1.0 for four consecutive quarters. The Company was in compliance with these covenants and similar covenants in prior facilities for all periods presented. As of December 31, 2014,2015, the Company's consolidated leverage ratio was 0.30.4 to 1.0, and consolidated interest coverage ratio was 52.342.9 to 1.0.

        The Company entered into a five year revolving credit facility (the "Credit Facility") with various lenders, effective June 28, 2013, which provides for initial borrowings of up to $125.0 million and replaced


Table of Contents

the Company's previous revolving credit facility. Lenders may, at their option upon the Company's request, expand the facility to $200.0 million. There were no borrowings under the Credit Facility at December 31, 20142015 or at any point during the year. The Credit Facility's covenants match those outlined above for the Senior Notes.

Short Term Liquidity and Capital Requirements

        Management believes its available cash, marketable securities and expected cash flow from operations will be sufficient to fund its short-term operating and capital requirements during 2015.2016. Expected short-term uses of cash include dividend payments, interest payments on outstanding debt, income tax payments, seed money for new products, capital expenditures including those related to the Project E initiatives, share repurchases, payment of deferred commissions to our financial advisors and third parties, pension funding, capital expenditures and home office leasehold and building improvements, and could include strategic acquisitions.

        In 2016, the Company plans to offer terminated, vested pension plan participants a one-time voluntary lump sum window distribution equal to the present value of the participant's pension benefit, in an effort to reduce pension obligations and ongoing annual pension expense. This offer may result in a noncash charge in the fourth quarter of 2016, in accordance with the relevant accounting standards, dependent on the number of plan participants who elect to take the lump sum distribution and the total amount of such distributions.

Long Term Liquidity and Capital Requirements

        Expected long-term capital requirements include indebtedness, operating leases and purchase obligations, and potential recognition of tax liabilities, summarized in the following table as of


Table of Contents

December 31, 2014.2015. Purchase obligations include amounts that will be due for the purchase of goods and services to be used in our operations under long-term commitments or contracts. The majority of our purchase obligations are reimbursable to us by the Funds.


 Total 2015 2016-
2017
 2018-
2019
 Thereafter/
Indeterminate
  Total 2016 2017-
2018
 2019-
2020
 Thereafter/
Indeterminate
 

 (in thousands)
  (in thousands)
 

Long-term debt obligations, including interest

 $242,131 10,213 20,425 108,300 103,193  $231,919 10,213 113,050 10,925 97,731 

Non-cancelable operating lease commitments

 85,133 21,927 33,098 15,755 14,353  80,000 22,564 31,664 13,577 12,195 

Purchase obligations

 228,248 46,643 70,668 67,697 43,240  147,604 55,066 64,968 20,098 7,472 

Unrecognized tax benefits

 11,619 798   10,821  11,890 38   11,852 

 $567,131 79,581 124,191 191,752 171,607  $471,413 87,881 209,682 44,600 129,250 

        Other possible long-term discretionary uses of cash could include capital expenditures for enhancement of technology infrastructure and home office expansion, strategic acquisitions, payment of dividends, income tax payments, seed money for new products, pension funding, repurchases of our common stock, and payment of upfront fund commissions for Class C shares and certain fee-based asset allocation products. We expect payment of upfront fund commissions for certain fee-based asset allocation products will decline in future years due to a change in our advisor compensation plan whereby a smaller population of advisors are eligible for upfront fund commissions on the sale of these products.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

        Other than operating leases, which are included in the table above, the Company does not have any off-balance sheet financing. The Company has not created, and is not party to, any special-purpose or off-balance sheet entities for the purpose of raising capital, incurring debt or operating its business.

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

        Management believes the following critical accounting policies affect its significant estimates and judgments used in the preparation of its consolidated financial statements.

Accounting for Goodwill and Intangible Assets

        As of December 31, 2014,2015, our total goodwill and intangible assets were $158.1 million, or 10%, of our total assets. Two significant considerations arise with respect to these assets that require management


Table of Contents

estimates and judgment: (i) the valuation in connection with the initial purchase price allocation, and (ii) the ongoing evaluation of impairment.

        In connection with all of our acquisitions, an evaluation is completed to determine reasonable purchase price allocations. The purchase price allocation process requires management estimates and judgments as to expectations for the various products, distribution channels and business strategies. For example, certain growth rates and operating margins were assumed for different products and distribution channels. If actual growth rates or operating margins, among other assumptions, differ from the estimates and judgments used in the purchase price allocation, the amounts recorded in the financial statements for identifiable intangible assets and goodwill could be subject to charges for impairment in the future.

        We complete an ongoing review of the recoverability of goodwill and intangible assets using a fair-value or income based approach on an annual basis or more frequently whenever events occur or circumstances change that would more likely than not reduce the fair value of a reporting unit below its carrying amount. Intangible assets with indefinite lives, primarily acquired mutual fund advisory contracts, are also tested for impairment annually by comparing their fair value to the carrying amount of the asset. We consider mutual fund advisory contracts indefinite lived intangible assets as they are expected to be renewed without significant cost or modification of terms. Factors that are considered important in


Table of Contents

determining whether an impairment of goodwill or intangible assets might exist include significant continued underperformance compared to peers, the likelihood of termination or non-renewal of a mutual fund advisory or subadvisory contract or substantial changes in revenues earned from such contracts, significant changes in our business and products, material and ongoing negative industry or economic trends, or other factors specific to each asset or subsidiary being evaluated. Because of the significance of goodwill and other intangibles to our consolidated balance sheets, the annual impairment analysis is critical. Any changes in key assumptions about our business and our prospects, or changes in market conditions or other externalities, could result in an impairment charge.

        During the third quarter of 2012, $59.2 million of goodwill related to Legend was allocated to assets of discontinued operations held for sale. Additionally, $42.4 million of goodwill was written down and is included in the loss from discontinued operations in the statement of income in 2012.

In 2014,2015, the Company's annual impairment test completed during the second quarter indicated that goodwill and identifiable intangible assets were not impaired. Related to goodwill, the fair value of the investment management and related services reporting unit exceeded its carrying value by more than 100%. The fair value of indefinite life intangible assets excluding the MFC intangible also exceeded its carrying value by more than 100%. At that time, theThe fair value of the $16.3 millionMFC intangible (with an associated deferred tax liability of $6.0 million) related to our subadvisory agreement to manage certain mutual fund products for MFC exceeded its carrying amount by 5%10%. This excess represented a decline compared to the prior year due to a decline in the related assets under management attributed to a realignment of MFC's fund offerings and additional asset reductions.

Based on the result of our annual test, we increased the frequency of our impairment analysis for the MFC intangible asset. It is possible that the assets we manage for MFC may decrease in the future, which would require us to assess the need for a write-down of the intangible asset.

During the third quarter of 2014, we recorded an impairment charge of $7.9 million related to thisthe MFC intangible asset as a result of a further decline in the related assets under management and associated cash flows. We also reduced the associated deferred tax liability by $2.9 million. As of December 31, 2014, the MFC intangible balance is $8.4 million with an associated deferred tax liability of $3.1 million. It is possible that the assets we manage for MFC may decrease in the future, which would require us to assess the need for an additional write-down of the intangible asset.

        Additionally during the third quarter of 2014, we recorded a $4.1 million intangible asset related to a fund adoption transaction agreement with Emerging Managers Group, L.P., which became effective in August 2014, throughpursuant to which Ivy Investment Management CompanyIICO assumed responsibility as investment adviser and Ivy Funds Distributor, Inc. serves asglobal distributor of the Selector ManagementIGI Funds.


Table of Contents

Accounting for Income Taxes

        In the ordinary course of business, many transactions occur for which the ultimate tax outcome is uncertain. In addition, respective tax authorities periodically audit our income tax returns. These audits examine our significant tax filing positions, including the timing and amounts of deductions and the allocation of income among tax jurisdictions. We adjust our income tax provision in the period in which we determine the actual outcomes will likely be different from our estimates. The recognition or derecognition of income tax expense related to uncertain tax positions is determined under the guidance as prescribed by ASC 740"Income Taxes Topic,Topic." Accounting Standards Codification ("ASC") 740. During 2015, 2014, 2013 and 2012,2013, the Company settled three, six, four and threefour open tax years, respectively, that were undergoing audit by state jurisdictions in which the Company operates. These audits were settled in all material respects with no significant adjustments. The Company is currently undergoing auditsbeing audited in various otherone state jurisdictions that have not yet been settled.jurisdiction.

        We recognize an asset or liability for the deferred tax consequences of temporary differences between the tax basis of assets and liabilities and their reported amounts in the financial statements, including the determination of any valuation allowance that might be required for deferred tax assets. These temporary differences will result in taxable or deductible amounts in future years when the reported amounts of assets are recovered or liabilities are settled.

        During 2013, the Company realized a capital loss on the sale of Legend, which is available to offset potential future capital gains. Any unutilized capital loss carryforward will expire in 2018. Due to the character of the loss and the limited carryforward period permitted by law, the Company may not realize the full tax benefit of the capital loss. Additionally, the Company has deferred tax assets for unrealized capital losses on investment securities. Management believes it is not more likely than not that the Company will generate sufficient future capital gains to realize the full benefit of these capital losses.


Table of Contents

Accordingly, a valuation allowance has been recorded on the deferred tax assets that were capital in nature as of December 31, 2015, December 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013.

        As of December 31, 2014,2015, two of the Company's subsidiaries have state net operating loss carryforwards in certain states in which those companies file taxes on a separate company basis. These entities have recognized a deferred tax asset for such carryforwards. The carryforwards, if not utilized, will expire between 20152016 and 2034.2035. Management believes it is not more likely than not that the subsidiaries will generate sufficient future taxable income in these states to realize the benefit of these state net operating loss carryforwards and, accordingly, a valuation allowance has been recorded at December 31, 2015, December 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013.

        We have not recorded a valuation allowance on any other deferred tax assets as of the current reporting period based on our belief that operating income will, more likely than not, be sufficient to realize the benefit of these assets over time. In the event that actual results differ from estimates or if our historical trend of positive operating income changes, we may be required to record a valuation allowance on deferred tax assets, which could have a significant effect on our consolidated financial condition and results of operations.

        Income taxes are recorded at the rates in effect in the various tax jurisdictions in which we operate. Tax law and rate changes are reflected in the income tax provision in the period in which such changes are enacted.

Pension and Other Postretirement Benefits

        Accounting for our pension and postretirement benefit plans requires us to estimate the cost of benefits to be provided well into the future and the current value of our benefit obligations. Three critical assumptions affecting these estimates are the discount rate, the expected return on assets and the expected health care cost trend rate. The discount rate assumption was based on the Aon Hewitt AA Only Above Median Yield Curve. This discount rate was determined separately for each plan by plotting the expected benefit payments from each plan against a yield curve of high quality, zero coupon bonds and calculating the single rate that would produce the same present value of liabilities as the yield curve. The expected


Table of Contents

return on plan assets and health care cost trend rates are based upon an evaluation of our historical trends and experience, taking into account current and expected future market conditions. Other assumptions include rates of future compensation increases, participant withdrawals and mortality rates, and participant retirement ages. These estimates and assumptions impact the amount of net pension expense or income recognized each year and the measurement of our reported benefit obligation under the plans.

        In 2014,2015, we utilized a discount rate of 4.13%4.60% for our pension plan compared to 4.13% in 2014 and 4.97% in 2013 and 4.22% in 2012 to reflect market rates. The discount rate for our postretirement medical plan was 4.07%4.44%, 4.07% and 4.94% in 2015, 2014 and 4.18% in 2014, 2013 and 2012 respectively. We continueIn 2015, we continued to assume long-term asset returns of 7.75% on the assets in our pension plan, the same as our assumption in 20132014 and 2012.2013. Our pension plan assets at December 31, 20142015 were 100% invested in the Asset Strategy style and while we have targeted this same investment strategy going forward.forward, we will assume long-term asset returns of 7.50% beginning in 2016.


Table of Contents

        The effect of hypothetical changes to selected assumptions on the Company's retirement benefit plans would be as follows:

 
  
 As of
December 31, 2014
2015
 For the year
ended
December 31,
20152016
Assumptions
 Change
 Increase
(Decrease)
PBO/APBO (1)

 Increase
(Decrease)
Expense (2)

     
 
  
 (in thousands)

Pension

        

Discount rate

 +/–50 bps $(12,325)(12,931)/13,63414,367 $(1,497)(1,594)/1,6411,757

Expected return on assets

 +/–100 bps  N/A  (1,814)(1,793)/1,8141,793

Salary scale

 +/–100 bps  8,681/(7,873)9,518/(8,603)  2,121/(1,889)2,318/(2,070)

Other Postretirement

        

Discount rate

 +/–50 bps  (574)(480)/626525  (46)(77)/4983

Health care cost trend rate

 +/–100 bps  1,192/(1,027)1,018/(874)  205/(203)256/(217)

(1)
Projected benefit obligation ("PBO") for pension plans and accumulated postretirement benefit obligation ("APBO") for other postretirement plans.

(2)
Pre-tax impact on expense.

Deferred Sales Commissions

        We pay upfront sales commissions to our financial advisors and third party intermediary broker/dealers in connection with the sale of certain classes of mutual fund shares sold without a front-end sales charge. These costs are capitalized and amortized over the period during which the shareholder is subject to a CDSC, not to exceed five years. We recover these costs through Rule 12b-1 and other distribution plan fees, which are paid by the applicable share classes of the Advisors Funds, Ivy Funds and InvestEd, along with CDSCs paid by shareholders who redeem their shares prior to completion of the specified holding periods. Should we lose our ability to recover such sales commissions through distribution plan payments and CDSCs, the value of these assets would immediately decline, as would future cash flows. We periodically review the recoverability of deferred sales commission assets as events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of deferred sales commission assets may not be recoverable and adjust the deferred assets accordingly.


Table of Contents

Valuation of Investments

        We record substantially all investments in our financial statements at fair value. Where available, we use prices from independent sources such as listed market prices or broker/dealer price quotations. We evaluate our investmentsavailable for sale securities for other than temporary declines in value on a periodic basis. This may exist when the fair value of an investment security has been below the current value for an extended period of time. As most of our investments are carried at fair value, ifIf an other than temporary decline in value is determined to exist, the unrealized investment loss recorded net of tax in accumulated other comprehensive income is realized as a charge to net income, in the period in which the other than temporary decline in value is determined. While we believe that we have accurately estimated the amount of the other than temporary decline in the value of our portfolio, different assumptions could result in changes to the recorded amounts in our financial statements.


Table of Contents

Loss Contingencies

        The likelihood that a loss contingency exists is evaluated using the criteria of"Contingencies Topic," ASC 450 through consultation with legal counsel. A loss contingency is recorded if the contingency is considered probable and reasonably estimable as of the date of the financial statements.

Seasonality and Inflation

        We do not believe our operations are subject to significant seasonal fluctuation. We have historically experienced increased sales activity in the first and fourth quarters of the year due to funding of retirement accounts by our clients. The Company has not suffered material adverse effects from inflation in the past. However, a substantial increase in the inflation rate in the future may adversely affect customers' purchasing decisions, may increase the costs of borrowing, or may have an impact on the Company's margins and overall cost structure.

ITEM 7A.    Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

        We use various financial instruments with certain inherent market risks, primarily related to interest rates and securities prices. The principal risks of loss arising from adverse changes in market rates and prices to which we are exposed relate to interest rates on debt and marketable securities. Generally, these instruments have not been entered into for trading purposes. Management actively monitors these risk exposures; however, fluctuations could impact our results of operations and financial position. As a matter of policy, we only execute derivative transactions to manage exposures arising in the normal course of business and not for speculative or trading purposes. The following information, together with information included in other parts of Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, which are incorporated herein by reference, describe the key aspects of certain financial instruments that have market risk to us.

Interest Rate Sensitivity

        Our interest sensitive liabilities include our long-term fixed rate senior notes and obligations for any balances outstanding under our credit facility or other short-term borrowings. Increases in market interest rates would generally cause a decrease in the fair value of the senior notes and an increase in interest expense associated with short-term borrowings and borrowings under the credit facility. Decreases in market interest rates would generally cause an increase in the fair value of the senior notes and a decrease in interest expense associated with short-term borrowings and borrowings under the credit facility. We had no short-term borrowings outstanding as of December 31, 2014.2015.

Investment Securities Sensitivity

        We maintain an investment portfolio of various holdings, types and maturities. Our portfolio is diversified and consists primarily of affiliated funds (mutual funds and UCITS sub-funds).sponsored funds. A portion of investments are classified as available for sale investments. At any time, a sharp increase in interest rates or


Table of Contents

a sharp decline in the United States stock market could have a significant negative impact on the fair value of our investment portfolio. If a decline in fair value is determined to be other than temporary by management, the cost basis of the individual security or mutual fund is written down to fair value. We did not hedge these exposures in 2014. However,In 2016, we intend to establishhave established a hedging program in 2015 that uses derivative instrumentsa total return swap to hedge our exposure to fluctuations in the value of our investment portfolio. Conversely, declines in interest rates or a sizeable rise in the United States stock market could have a significant positive impact on our investment portfolio. However, unrealized gains are not recognized in operations on available for sale securities until they are sold.


Table of Contents

        The following is a summary of the effect that a 10% increase or decrease in equity or fixed income prices would have on our investment portfolio subject to equity or fixed income price fluctuations at December 31, 2014:2015:

Investment Securities
 Fair Value
 Fair Value
Assuming a 10%
Increase

 Fair Value
Assuming a 10%
Decrease

  Fair Value
 Fair Value
Assuming a 10%
Increase

 Fair Value
Assuming a 10%
Decrease

 
           

  
 (in thousands)
  
   
 (in thousands)
  
 

Available for sale:

              

Affiliated funds

 $161,270 177,397 145,143 

Sponsored funds

 $40,552 44,607 36,497 

Sponsored privately offered funds

 825 908 743 

Trading:

 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 

Affiliated funds

 81,913 90,104 73,722 

Sponsored funds

 29,701 32,671 26,731 

Equity securities

 72 79 65  87 96 78 

Asset-backed securities

 28 31 25  20 22 18 

Corporate bonds

 5 6 5 

Equity Method:

 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Sponsored funds

 217,380 239,118 195,642 

Sponsored privately offered funds

 3,173 3,490 2,856 

Total

 $243,283 267,611 218,955  $291,743 320,918 262,570 

Securities Price Sensitivity

        Our revenues are dependent on the underlying assets under management in the Funds to which investment advisory services are provided. The Funds include portfolios of investments comprised of various combinations of equity, fixed income and other types of securities and commodities. Fluctuations in the value of these securities are common and are generated by numerous factors, including, without limitation, market volatility, the overall economy, inflation, changes in investor strategies, availability of alternative investment vehicles, government regulations and others. Accordingly, declines in any one or a combination of these factors, or other factors not separately identified, may reduce the value of investment securities and, in turn, the underlying assets under management on which our revenues are earned. These declines have an impact in our investment sales and our trading portfolio, thereby compounding the impact on our earnings.

ITEM 8.    Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

        Reference is made to the Consolidated Financial Statements referred to in the Index on page 5152 setting forth our consolidated financial statements, together with the report of KPMG LLP dated February 26, 201525, 2016 on page 52.53.

ITEM 9.    Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure

        None.

ITEM 9A.    Controls and Procedures

(a)
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures.    The Company maintains a system of disclosure controls and procedures that is designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the Company in the reports that it files or submits under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act") is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods

Table of Contents