Use these links to rapidly review the document
Table of Contents
ITEM 8. CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA

Table of Contents


UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K

6


ý



ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934


FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 20152017


o



TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

Commission File Number 0-21719

Steel Dynamics, Inc.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Indiana

(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)

35-1929476

(IRS Employer
Identification No.)


7575 West Jefferson Blvd, Fort Wayne, IN

(Address of principal executive offices)



46804

(Zip Code)

Registrant'sRegistrant’s telephone number, including area code:(260) 969-3500

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

Title of each class

Name of each exchange on which registered

Common Stock, $.0025 par value

Nasdaq Global Select Stock Market

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:None

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes ý No o

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes o  No ý

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ý No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate website, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes ý No o

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (§229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant'sregistrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of "large“large accelerated filer," "accelerated filer"” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company,” and "smaller reporting company"“emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filer ý

Accelerated file o

Non-accelerated filer o

(Do not check if a
smaller reporting company.)

Smaller reporting company o

Emerging growth company ☐

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for

complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act.   ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). Yes o No ý

The aggregate market value of the voting stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant computed by reference to the price at which the common equity was last sold as of June 30, 2015,2017, was approximately $4,117,734,350.$5,979 million. Registrant has no non-voting shares. For purposes of this calculation, shares of common stock held by directors, officers and 5% stockholders known to the registrant have been deemed to be owned by affiliates, but this should not be construed as an admission that any such person possesses the power, direct or indirect, to direct or cause the direction of the management or policies of the registrant or that such person is controlled by or under common control with the registrant.

As of February 17, 2016,20, 2018, Registrant had outstanding 243,186,659236,071,369 shares of common stock.

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE



Portions of registrant'sregistrant’s definitive proxy statement referenced in Part III, Items 10 through 14 of this report, to be filed prior to April 29, 2016,May 1, 2018, are incorporated herein by reference.


STEEL DYNAMICS, INC.

Table of Contents


STEEL DYNAMICS, INC.

Table of Contents



Page

Part I

 


Item 1.

Business


3

Item 1A.

Risk Factors

19

Item 1B.

Unresolved Staff Comments

29

Item 2.

Properties

30

Item 3.

Legal Proceedings

31

Item 4.

Mine Safety Disclosures

31

Part II

 


Page

Part I

Item 1.

Business

3

Item 5.1A.

Risk Factors

16

Item 1B.

Unresolved Staff Comments

22

Item 2.

Properties

23

Item 3.

Legal Proceedings

24

Item 4.

Mine Safety Disclosures

24

Part II

Item 5.

Market for Registrant'sRegistrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities


32

25

Item 6.

Selected Financial Data

34

27

Item 7.

Management'sManagement’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results or Operations

37

29

Item 7A.

Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

57

41

Item 8.

Consolidated Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

42

Item 9.

59

Item 9.

Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure

75

Item 9A.

104

Item 9A.

Controls and Procedures

104

75

Item 9B.

Other Information

104

75

Part III

 


Item 10.

Directors, Executive Officers, and Corporate Governance

76

Item 11.

Executive Compensation


105

76

Item 11.12.

Executive Compensation

105

Item 12.

Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters

105

76

Item 13.

Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence

106

76

Item 14.

Principal Accounting Fees and Services

106

76

Part IV

 


Item 15.

Exhibits,

Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules

77

Item 16.

Form 10-K Summary

77


107Exhibit
Index

78

Signatures

81



Table of Contents


PART I

Special Note Regarding Forward-LookingForward‑Looking Statements

Throughout this report, or in other reports or registration statements filed from time to time with the Securities and Exchange Commission under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, or under the Securities Act of 1933, as well as in documents we incorporate by reference herein or herefrom, or in press releases or oral statements made by our officers or Regulation FD authorized representatives, we may make statements that express our opinions, expectations, or projections regarding future events or future results, in contrast with statements that reflect present or  historical facts. These predictive statements, which we generally precede or accompany by such typical conditional words as "anticipate," "intend," "believe," "estimate," "plan," "seek," "project"“anticipate,” “intend,” “believe,” “estimate,” “plan,” “seek,” “project” or "expect,"“expect,” or by the words "may," "will,"“may,” “will,” or "should,"“should,” are intended to operate as "forward“forward looking statements"statements” of the kind permitted by the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, incorporated in Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.  Such forward-looking statements involve both known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause our actual results, performance or achievements to be materially different from any future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements.  That legislation protects such predictive and cautionary statements by creating a "safe harbor"“safe harbor” from liability in the event that a particular prediction does not turn out as anticipated.

While we always intend to express our best judgment when we make statements about what we believe will occur in the future, and although we base these statements on assumptions that we believe to be reasonable when made, these forward looking statements are not a guarantee of performance, and you should not place undue reliance on such statements. Forward-looking statements are subject to many uncertainties and other variable circumstances, many of which are outside of our control, that could cause our actual results and experience to differ materially from those we thought would occur.

The following listing represents some, but not necessarily all, of the factors that may cause actual results to differ from those we may have anticipated or predicted:


·

United States or foreign trade policy affecting the amount of foreign steel imported in the United States, or adverse or less than satisfactory outcomes of pending and future trade cases alleging unlawful practices in connection with steel imports;

·

increased price competition brought about by global steelmaking overcapacity;

·

the adverse impact of periods of slower than anticipated economic growth or the risk of a new recession, resulting in a general decrease of or stagnating demand for our products;

·

the weakening of demand for steel products within the non-residential and residential construction, automotive, manufacturing, appliance, pipe and tube, and other steel-consuming industries;

·

conditions affecting steel or recycled metals consumption;

·

cyclical changes in market supply and demand for steel and recycled metals;

·

changes in the availability or cost of raw materials, such as recycled metals, iron substitute materials, including pig iron, iron concentrate, or other raw materials or supplies, which we use in our production processes;

·

periodic fluctuations in the availability and cost of electricity, natural gas, or other utilities;

·

the impact of, or changes in, environmental law or in the application of other legal or regulatory requirements upon our production processes or costs of production or upon those of our suppliers or customers, including actions by government agencies, such as the United States Environmental Protection Agency or related state agencies, upon our receipt of pending or future environmentally related construction or operating permits;

·

the impact of United States government or various other governmental agencies introducing laws or regulatory changes in response to the subject of climate change and greenhouse gas emissions, including the introduction of carbon emissions limitations or trading mechanisms;

·

increased price and other forms of competition from other steel producers, scrap processors and alternative materials;

·

margin compression resulting from falling selling prices with no offsetting reduction in raw material costs, or our inability to pass increases in costs of raw materials and supplies, if any, onto our customers;

·

margin compression resulting from falling prices with no offsetting reduction in raw material costs, or our inability to pass increases in costs of raw materials and supplies, if any, on to our customers;

Table of Contents1


·

increased cybersecurity threats and vulnerabilities and increased global information technology security requirements, and a rise in sophisticated cyber crimes that pose a risk to the security of our operating systems and data networks and to the confidentiality, availability, and integrity of sensitive data, including intellectual property, proprietary information, financial information, customer, supplier and business partner information, and personally identifiable information;

·

changes in our business strategies or development plans which we have adopted or may adopt, and any difficulty or inability to timely, costs efficiently and successfully consummate, implement, integrate or operate any planned or potential projects, acquisitions, joint ventures or strategic alliances;

·

the impact of impairment charges;

·

private or governmental liability claims or litigation, or the impact of any adverse litigation costs or outcome of any litigation on the adequacy of our reserves or the availability or adequacy of our insurance coverage;

·

the occurrence of unanticipated equipment failures and plant outages;

·

costs to idle facilities, idled facility carrying costs, or increased costs to resume production at idled facilities; and

·

uncertainties involving new products or new technologies.

We also refer you to and urge you to carefully read the section entitledRisk Factors at Item 1A of this report to better understand some of the principal risks and uncertainties inherent in our businesses or in owning our securities, as well as the section entitledManagement Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operationsat Item 7.7. You should also review the notes to consolidated financial statements under headings in Note 1Use of Estimates and in Note 9Commitments and Contingencies.

Any forward-looking statements which we make in this report or in any of the documents that are incorporated by reference herein or herefrom speak only as of the date of such statement, and we undertake no ongoing obligation to update such statements. Comparisons of results between current and any prior periods are not intended to express any future trends or indications of future performance, unless expressed as such, and should only be viewed as historical data.


Table of Contents2


ITEM 1.BUSINESS ITEM 1.    BUSINESS

Our Company



Our Company

Steel Dynamics, Inc. (the company) is one of the largest domestic steel producers and one of the largest metalsmetal recyclers in the United States based on a current estimated annual steelmaking and coating capabilitycapacity of approximatelyover 11 million tons and actual metals recycling volumes.  We reported net sales of $7.6 billion, $8.8 billion, and $7.4 billion during 2015, 2014, and 2013, respectively. The primary sourcessource of our revenues are from the manufacture and sale of steel products, processing and sale of recycled ferrous and nonferrous metals, and the fabrication and sale of steel joistjoists and deck products.

We believe our strategic focus to drive value for shareholders, customers, employees and communities is differentiated through our six Core Operating and Leadership Principals:

·

Safety – We are focused on providing a safe working environment for all employees.  Our goal is to achieve zero injuries – no accidents, no lost workdays, and no injuries. Our industry-leading recordable incident rate has fallen to record levels each of the last five years, including an 18% drop in 2017, and 68% of our locations had zero recordable injuries in 2017.

·

Enhancing Customer Relationships and Commitment – Our customers are our most important partners.  We strive to be a preferred partner by providing quality products and solutions, exceeding both current expectations and future needs.

·

Sustaining Superior Operating Culture – Success is not driven by state-of-the-art technology alone, but, more importantly, it is linked to managing the technology, and creating a culture in which to exploit it.  Our entrepreneurial culture fosters an energetic, driven and innovative team, through respect, opportunity, open communication and performance-based compensation aligned to our strategy.

·

Strategic Growth, Intentional Margin Expansion and Consistency Through the Cycle – We are focused on growth opportunities that provide sustainable, high profit margins within our areas of expertise, through both strong and weak market environments, with diversification in end markets and product offerings.  We will leverage our existing facilities through capital-effective organic growth, greenfield expansion, and the continued exploration of new opportunities, including downstream production assets that utilize our steel products.

·

Driving Innovation – We continually challenge the status quo, to drive innovation to improve safety, quality and productivity, implementing new technologies and processes to not only exceed current customer expectations, but to meet their future needs. 

·

Financial Strength and Flexibility – We have a disciplined focus on remaining a low-cost, highly efficient, customer-centric company generating best-in-class financial and operating performance that drives strong cash flow generation to support our current operations and continued growth.

Competitive Strengths / Business Strategies

We believe our financial strength and flexibility, coupled with our competitive advantages of maintaining a low, highly variable cost structure, producing a diversified value-added product offering, controlling a secure supply of recycled ferrous metals, fostering an entity-wide entrepreneurial culture and having an experienced senior management team and work force, positions us well to continue to strengthen our leadership position and execute our growth strategy.

One of the Lowest Cost Steel Producers in the United States; State-of-the-Art Facilities / Continue to Maintain Low Production Costs

We are focused on continuing to maintain and enhance one of the lowest operating cost structures in the North American steel industry. Our low operating costs are primarily a result of our efficient plant designs and operations, our high productivity rate, such as our productivity rate of approximately 0.3 man hours per hot band ton produced at our Butler Flat Roll Division, low ongoing maintenance cost requirements and strategic locations near our customers and sources of our primary raw material, ferrous scrap.

We will continue to strivedrive innovative ways to optimize the use of our equipment, enhance our productivity and explore new technologies to further improve our unit costs of production at each of our facilities. As one of the lowest cost producers in each of our three primary operating segments, we are able to better manage through cyclical and non-cyclical downturns, and to consistently maximize our profitability. We continuously seek to maximize the variability of our cost structure and to reduce per unit and fixed costs. Our incentive compensation plans at all employee levels are based on both divisional and consolidated company performance. Performance-based incentive compensation is designed to reward high productivity and efficient and safe use of physical resources and capital employed. Additionally, leveraging our existing facilities through capital effective organic growth and diversified product offerings allows us to maximize utilization of our current cost structures.structure.

Secure Supply of High Quality Just-in-timeJust-in-Time Ferrous Raw Materials



We maintain a secure supply of ferrous raw material resources through the benefit of our metals recycling operations and Iron Dynamics.Dynamics (IDI). Ferrous materials represent the single largest raw material component of our steel operations'operations’ manufacturing costs, excluding The Techs, representing 55% and 65%at approximately 60% of such costs incosts. During 2017, 2016, and 2015, and 2014, respectively. During 2015 and 2014,OmniSource, our metals recycling operations, (OmniSource) provided our steel operations with 37%38%, 40%, and 44%41%, respectively, of its ferrous scrap requirements based on volume.requirements. This represented 63%, 61%, and 54% and 48% of OmniSource'sOmniSource’s total ferrous scrap shipments during 20152017, 

3


2016, and 2014,2015, respectively. During 20152017, 2016,  and 2014,2015,  our steel operations consumed 8.810.3 million, 9.9 million, and 7.68.8 million tons, respectively, of metallic materials, of which iron units, other than scrap, represented approximately 13%, 14%, and 12% in 2017, 2016,  and 9% in 2015,  and 2014, respectively. Iron DynamicsIDI supplies 100% of its production to the Butler Flat Roll Division, representing 66%72%, 65%, and 62%66% of their iron units other than scrap in 20152017, 2016,  and 2014,2015,  respectively, through the transfer of liquid pig iron and hot briquetted iron, which are higher-quality,higher quality, energy-saving ferrous raw materials. We believe our metals recycling operations and


Table of Contents

Iron Dynamics IDI provide us with a high quality, cost effective, and secure raw material platform for effective working capital management.

Diversified Product Mix / ExpandExpanded Product Offerings

We are one of the most diversified steel companies in the United States, with very broad product offerings. We currently offer a broad range of steel products (see(more specifically enumerated in the Steel Operations Products and Sales by End Market table following)later in this section), including:

This diversified mixportfolio of products enables us to access a broad range of end-user markets, serve a broad customer base, and help mitigate our market exposure to any one product or end-user market.market, resulting in increased utilization. In addition, our value-added product offerings help to balance our exposure to commodity grade products supplied by other domestic steel, and to a larger extent in 2015 and 2014,recent years, foreign manufacturers.

We will continue to seek additional opportunities and to collaborate with our customers to anticipate their future needs toby further expandexpanding our range of products and offerings, which may allow our customers the ability to more effectively and efficiently navigate their supply chain. One such as the recent expansionsopportunity is our soon to be completed $28 million investment at our EngineeredRoanoke Bar Products Division, into high-quality smaller-diameter SBQ bars,to utilize existing excess melting and casting capability with the addition of a rolling line to add approximately 200,000 tons annually of reinforcing bar capacity, including multi-strand slitting and finishing. Another opportunity is our on-going $75 million investment at our Structural and Rail Division into premium grade rails. We alsoto utilize greenfield projectsexcess melting and acquisitions, such as the September 14, 2015 purchasecasting capability to produce up to 240,000 tons of steel deck facilities from Consolidated Systems, Inc. (CSi),various sizes of reinforcing bar including custom cut-to-length, smooth bar, and the September 16, 2014, acquisition of Columbus Flat Roll Division, for avenues of further diversification. Columbus Flat Roll Division is in the process of expanding its offering of value-added flat roll steel products through the addition of painting and Galvalume® capabilities, which is expected to begin operations in the first quarter of 2017.coiled. 

Strategic Geographic Locations / Enter New Geographic Markets

The majority of our steelmaking facilities are in locations near sources of scrap materials and near our customer base, allowing us to realize freight savings for inbound scrap as well as for outbound steel products destined for our customers. This also allows us to provide consistent on-time delivery to our customer base with relatively short lead times, further enhancing our customer relationships. Our coated sheet steel products are costalso effectively available through our locations in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, and Jeffersonville, Indiana and Columbus, Mississippi, due to river access, as are all of our Columbus Flat Roll Division sheet steel products.access.  Recycled ferrous scrap and iron units represent the most significant component of our cost of steel manufacturing. OurWe believe that our metals recycling facilities are located in the Upper Midwest and Southeastern U.S., and thus further expand our geographic service area. We believe these regions that account for a majority of the total ferrous scrap produced in the United States. Our steel fabrication operations have a national footprint allowing us to serve the entire joist and deck domestic market and national accounts.


Table of Contents

We may seek to enter new markets in strategic geographic locations that offer attractive growth opportunities.opportunities within our areas of expertise.

Experienced Management Team and Unique Corporate Culture / Foster Entrepreneurial Culture

Our senior management team is highly experienced and has a proven track record in the steel, metals recycling, and steel fabrication industries. Management'sManagement’s objectives are closely aligned with our stockholders through meaningful stock ownership positions and performance-basedperformance‑based compensation programs that are correlated to the company'scompany’s profitability and operational performance in relationship to its steel manufacturing peers. Our entrepreneurial culture resonates throughout each of our operating segments. We emphasize decentralized decision making, with corporate risk oversight, and have established incentive compensation programs specifically designed to reward employee teams for their efforts toward identifying innovative ways to enhance productivity, improve profitability, and control costs.

4


We intend to continue to foster our entrepreneurial culture and emphasize decentralized operational decision making and responsibility, while maintainingcontinuing to maintain appropriate corporate policy and risk oversight. We will reward teamwork, innovation, and operating efficiency. Weefficiency, and will also continue to focus on maintaining the effectiveness of our incentive-basedincentive‑based bonus plans that are designed to maximize overall productivity and align the interests of our management and employees with our stockholders.

Experienced Executive Management Team

Name

Age

Position

Mark D. Millett

58

Chief Executive Officer

Theresa E. Wagler

47

Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

Russell B. Rinn

60

Executive Vice President Metals Recycling and

    President and COO of OmniSource Corporation

Chris A. Graham

53

Senior Vice President, Manufacturing Group

Glenn A. Pushis

52

Senior Vice President, Long Products Steel Group

Barry T. Schneider

49

Senior Vice President, Flat Roll Steel Group

Industry SegmentsMark D. Millett, a co-founder of our company and director since inception, has been our President and Chief Executive Officer since January 2012. Prior to that, Mr. Millett has held various positions, including President and Chief Operating Officer, Executive Vice President of Metals Recycling and Ferrous Resources, President and Chief Operating Officer of OmniSource Corporation, and Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer for Flat Rolled Steels and Ferrous Resources.  Mr. Millett was responsible for the design, construction, and start-up operation of our Butler, Indiana flat roll, melting and casting operations. Mr. Millett, prior to his co-founding of Steel Dynamics, served from 1981 to 1985 as chief metallurgist for Nucor Corporation’s Darlington, South Carolina, division, charged with developing the world’s first commercially viable thin-slab-casting process as the manager of that project at Nucor’s Hazelett facility. In 1987, Mr. Millett was given the responsibility by Nucor for the design, construction, staffing, and operation of the melting and casting facility at Nucor’s world’s‑first thin-slab casting facility at Crawfordsville, Indiana. Mr. Millett holds a bachelor’s degree in metallurgy from the University of Surrey in England. Mr. Millett was named Steelmaker of the Year in 2014 by the Association of Iron and Steel Technology.



Theresa E. Wagler is our Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer since May 2007.  Ms. Wagler joined the Steel Dynamics corporate finance team in 1998, and has held various finance and accounting positions, including Chief Accounting Officer and Vice President and Corporate Controller, and was appointed to her current position in May 2007. She is responsible for and oversees accounting, risk management, taxation, treasury, and information technology functions, as well as, financial planning and analysis, investor relations, and corporate communications. Prior to joining Steel Dynamics, Ms. Wagler served as Assistant Corporate Controller for Fort Wayne National Bank and as a certified public accountant with Ernst & Young LLP. She graduated cum laude from Taylor University with a bachelor’s degree in accounting and systems analysis. In addition, Ms. Wagler serves as a director and chair of the audit committee of CF Industries Holdings, Inc., a public company, and also serves as a director and audit committee chair for Trine University.

Russell B. Rinn is our Executive Vice President for Metals Recycling, and President and Chief Operating Officer of OmniSource LLC (f/k/a OmniSource Corporation) since July 2011. Mr. Rinn is responsible for OmniSource’s ferrous and nonferrous metals recycling operations in the eastern half of the United States, as well as sourcing, marketing, trading, and logistics activities spanning the nation. OmniSource procures metal scrap, processes it, and markets these recycled metals to external customers and supplies ferrous scrap to the company’s steel mills. Prior to joining Steel Dynamics, Mr. Rinn was an Executive Vice President of Commercial Metals Company (CMC), a Texas-based mini-mill steel company. He has more than 30 years of experience in the steel and metals recycling industries. Mr. Rinn is a graduate of the Executive Program of the Stanford University Graduate School of Business and of the Management Development Program at the University of Michigan’s Business School. He holds a Bachelor’s degree in Finance, Marketing and Business Administration from Texas Lutheran University.

Chris A. Graham is our Senior Vice President, Manufacturing Group since March 2016. Since 2013, Mr. Graham served as a Vice President of Steel Dynamics and the President of New Millennium Building Systems fabrication operations. Mr. Graham is responsible for the company's fabrication operations and the company's other downstream manufacturing facilities. He will lead the company's strategic growth in the area of adding businesses that will utilize Steel Dynamics metal products as raw material in the manufacture of other products.  Mr. Graham was part of the team that constructed the company's first steel mill in 1994.  He held various leadership positions within the company's steel group prior to moving into the fabrication operations in 2007.  He was responsible for four operating fabrication plants from 2007 to 2010, at which point he also became the team leader responsible for overseeing the restructuring and integration of three acquired fabrication facilities, and in 2014 was made responsible for the integration of the Columbus Flat Roll Division.  Mr. Graham earned a bachelor's degree in business management from Western Governors University and an MBA from the University of Saint Francis. 

Glenn A. Pushis is our Senior Vice President, Long Products Steel Group since March 2016.  Since 2014, Mr. Pushis served as a Vice President overseeing the company's Butler Flat Roll Division and six flat roll coating facilities located in Indiana and Pennsylvania.  Mr. Pushis is responsible for the company's four long product steel mills, which together have approximately 3.8 million tons of annual steelmaking capacity, producing specialized engineered bars, structural steel, railroad rail, merchant bars and other specialty steels, primarily serving the construction, transportation and industrial sectors. Mr. Pushis was also part of the team that constructed the company's first steel mill in 1994.  He held various leadership positions within the company's steel group, including the positions of General Manager for the Engineered Bar Products Division from 2003 to 2007

5


and more recently, the Butler Flat Roll Division from 2007 to 2014. Mr. Pushis earned a bachelor's degree in mechanical engineering from Purdue University and his MBA from Indiana University.

Barry T. Schneider is our Senior Vice President, Flat Roll Steel Group since March 2016.  Since 2014, Mr. Schneider served as a Vice President overseeing the company's Engineered Bar Products and Roanoke Bar steel divisions.  Mr. Schneider is responsible for the company's two flat roll steel mills and eleven flat roll coating lines, which together have approximately 7.2 million tons of annual capacity, producing hot roll, cold roll and coated steel products, including a wide variety of specialty products, such as light gauge hot roll, galvanized and painted products. Mr. Schneider was also part of the team that constructed the company's first steel mill in 1994, serving in several engineering and operational roles in the melt shop during the company's first five years of operations. He was the manager of the Butler Flat Roll Division's hot strip mill and later the cold rolling and coating facilities from 2000 to 2007. Mr. Schneider then held the position of General Manager for the Engineered Bar Products Division from 2007 to 2014. Mr. Schneider earned a bachelor's degree in mechanical engineering and a master of science in engineering management from Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology.

Industry Segments

We have three reporting segments: steel operations, metals recycling operations, and steel fabrication operations.  Please referRefer to Notes 1 and 13 in the Notesnotes to Consolidated Financial Statementsconsolidated financial statements in Part II, Item 8 of this Form 10-K for additional segment information, including changes to our reporting segments that were effective beginning with the third quarter 2015 results.information.

Steel Operations Segment



Steel operations consist of our six electric arc furnace steel mills, producing steel from ferrous scrap and scrap substitutes, utilizing continuous casting, automated rolling mills and tenseveral downstream steel coating and bar processing lines, and Iron Dynamics (IDI),IDI, our liquid pig iron production facility, that supplies solely the Butler Flat Roll Division. Our steel operations sell directly to end users,end-users, steel fabricators, and service centers. These products are used in numerous industry sectors, including the construction, automotive, construction, manufacturing, transportation, heavy and agriculture equipment, and pipe and tube (including OCTG) markets. The most significant portion of our products is tied to the automotive, construction and other manufacturing sectors. Our steel operations accounted for 69%, 63%, and 61%72% of our consolidated net sales during 2017 and 2016, and 69% in 2015, 2014, and 2013, respectively.2015. We are predominantly a domestic steel company, with only 5%, 4%, and 4%5% of our revenues generated from exported sales during 2017, 2016,  and 2015,  and 2014, respectively.


Table of Contents

Our steel operations consist primarily of steelmaking and coating operations. The following chart summarizes the locations and the current estimated production capacities of our facilities:

Steel Production Capacity (tons)
 Casting Rolling/Billet 

Sheet Products:

       

Butler Flat Roll Division—Butler, Indiana

  3,050,000  3,000,000 

Columbus Flat Roll Division—Columbus, Mississippi

  3,400,000  3,200,000 

Long Products:

       

Structural and Rail Division—Columbia City, Indiana

  2,200,000  1,800,000 

Engineered Bar Products Division—Pittsboro, Indiana

  780,000  950,000 

Roanoke Bar DivisionRoanoke, Virginia

  650,000   

Merchant Bars

    500,000 

Billets

    150,000 

Steel of West Virginia—Huntington, West Virginia

  290,000  355,000 

  10,370,000  9,955,000 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

Steelmaking

 

 

 

 

 

Steel Production Capacity (tons)

 

Capacity

 

Galvanizing

 

Painting

 

Sheet Products:

 

 

 

(Included in Steelmaking Capacity)

 

Butler Flat Roll Division

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    Butler, Indiana

 

3,200,000 

 

785,000 

 

240,000 

 

    Jeffersonville, Indiana

 

 

 

370,000 

 

190,000 

 

Columbus Flat Roll Division – Columbus, Mississippi

 

3,200,000 

 

1,100,000 

 

250,000 

 

The Techs – Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania*

 

1,005,000 

 

1,005,000 

 

 -

 

Long Products:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Structural and Rail Division – Columbia City, Indiana

 

1,800,000 

 

 -

 

 -

 

Engineered Bar Products Division – Pittsboro, Indiana

 

950,000 

 

 -

 

 -

 

Vulcan Threaded Products Division – Pelham, Alabama**

 

120,000 

 

 

 

 

 

Roanoke Bar Division – Roanoke, Virginia

 

 

 

 -

 

 -

 

Merchant Bars

 

600,000 

 

 -

 

 -

 

Billets

 

120,000 

 

 -

 

 -

 

Steel of West Virginia – Huntington, West Virginia

 

355,000 

 

40,000 

 

 -

 



 

11,350,000 

 

3,300,000 

 

680,000 

 



Steel Coating Capacity (tons)
 Galvanizing Painting 

Sheet Products:

       

Butler Flat Roll Division (3 lines)—Butler, Indiana

  785,000  240,000 

Butler Flat Roll Division (2 lines)—Jeffersonville, Indiana

  370,000  190,000 

Columbus Flat Roll Division (2 lines)—Columbus, Mississippi

  1,100,000   

The Techs (3 lines)—Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania

  1,005,000   

  3,260,000  430,000 



Note: CapacitiesSteelmaking capacities represent manufacturing capabilities based on mill configuration and related employee support. These capacities do not represent expected volumes in a given year. In addition, estimates of mill capacity, particularly rolling capacity are highly dependent on the specific product mix manufactured. Each of our mills can and do roll many different types and sizes of products; therefore, our capacity estimates assume a typical product mix.

 *  The Techs galvanizing capacity is included in “Steelmaking Capacity” to represent the capability to utilize sheet steel substrate to  produce galvanized sheet steel at their facilities.

**  Vulcan Threaded Products bar finishing capacity is included in “Steelmaking Capacity’ to represent the capability to utilize steel long-product substrate to produce threaded rod, and cold draw and heat treat bar products at their facility.


Table of Contents6

 


The following chart summarizes our steel operations products and the percentage of sales tons by end market:


Table of Contents

SHEET PRODUCTS7

 


SHEET STEEL PRODUCTS

Our sheet steel products, consisting of hot roll, cold roll and coated steel products are produced by our Butler and Columbus Flat Roll Divisions, and our tenseveral downstream coating lines.lines, including The Techs. Our sheet steel operations represented 65%71%, 59%70%, and 57%65% of steel operations net sales in 2015, 2014,2017,  2016, and 2013,2015, respectively. We produced the following7.1 million, 6.9 million, and 6.0 million tons of sheet steel at these facilities (tons):in 2017, 2016, and 2015, respectively.

IDI produces liquid pig iron and hot briquetted iron (HBI) that serves as a substitute for a portion of the metallic raw material mix that goes directly into our Butler Flat Roll Division electric arc furnaces to produce steel. IDI’s primary focus is to maximize liquid pig iron production, due to the inherent economic benefits achieved at the steel mill when the material is used in the steelmaking process, such as reduced energy cost, reduced materials cost, and quicker melting cycles. During 2017 and 2016, respectively, IDI produced 259,000 and 255,000 metric tons, of which 90% and 98%, respectively, was liquid pig iron. We have used, and plan to continue to use, all of the facility’s output internally.

 
 2015 2014 

Butler Flat Roll Division

  2,695,000  3,016,000 

Columbus Flat Roll Division—since September 15, 2014 acquisition

  2,645,000  815,000 

The Techs

  661,000  712,000 



The following chart summarizes the types of sheet steel products we sold by sales dollars, during the respective years:

Sheet Steel Product Mix

Customers.Steel processors and service centers typically act as intermediaries between primary sheet steel producers and the many end-user manufacturers that require further processing of hot roll coils. The additional processing performed by the intermediate steel processors and service centers include pickling, galvanizing, cutting to length, slitting to size, leveling, blanking, shape correcting, edge rolling, shearing and stamping. We believe that our intermediate steel processor and service center customers will remain an integral part of our customer base. The Columbus Flat Roll Division allows us to capitalize on the industrial markets in the Southern U.S.United States and Mexico, as well as further expand our customer base intoin painted, and line and other pipe products. Galvanized flat roll products produced by our Butler and Columbus Flat Roll Divisions, and The Techs are similar and are sold to a similar customer base. However, The Techs specializes in the galvanizing of specific types of flat roll steels in generallyprimarily non-automotive applications, servicing a variety of customers in the heating, ventilation and air conditioning (HVAC), construction, agriculture and consumer goods markets. Our sheet steel operations also provide a significant portion of the sheet steel utilized in our steel fabrication operations.


Table of Contents8

 


The following chart summarizes the types of customers who purchased our sheet steel products, by sales dollars, during the respective years:


Sheet Steel Customers

        Competition.    Our sheet steelmaking operations compete with domestic and foreign integrated and electric arc furnace based hot roll coil producers. Additionally, the global steel industry suffers from over-capacity, and that excess capacity in 2015 has resulted in steel manufacturers in certain countries exporting steel at prices that are lower than prevailing domestic prices, and at or below their cost of production. Steel imports throughout 2015 and 2014 have been at record levels of 29% and 28% of U.S. consumption, respectively.

LONG PRODUCTS

   * Energy, included in Pipe & Tube, represents 5% of total sheet steel sales in 2017, and 2% in 2016 and 2015.

LONG PRODUCTS

Our Structural and Rail Division is capable of producing a variety of parallel flange sections such as Wide Flange Beams, American Standard Beams, Manufactured Housing Beams, and H Piling and Channel sections for the construction, transportation and industrial machinery markets. Further diversification of the product mix occurred in 2017, to include flat bars and large unequal leg angles used in construction markets. They also produce standard strength carbon, intermediate alloy hardness, and premium grade rails in 40 to 320 feet lengthslength for the railroad industry. Our state-of-the-art heat treating system allows us to produce high-qualityhigh quality premium rail, which has been certified by all but one Class I railroads. In addition, our rail-welding facility has the ability to weld rails(Continuous Welded Rail) in lengths up to lengths of 1,600 feet, which offers substantial savings to the railroads both in terms of initial capital cost and through reduced maintenance. Our StructuralWe are currently constructing a $75 million expansion to utilize existing excess melting and Rail Division produced 1.2 millioncasting capability to produce up to 240,000 tons of various sizes of reinforcing bar including custom cut-to-length, smooth bar, and 1.3 million tons during 2015 and 2014, respectively, of which 269,000 tons and 225,000 tons, respectively, was rail production.coiled.

Our Engineered Bar Products Division is capable of producing a broad array of engineered special-bar-quality (SBQ), merchant-bar-quality (MBQ), rounded-cornered squares, and smaller-diameter engineered round bars. The recently completed expansion of our smaller-diameter rolling mill increased the mill's product offering into high-quality smaller-diameter (1-inch to 3-inch) precision SBQ bars. Without this product diversification expansion, production tons at this mill could have been significantly less due to the weak heavy equipment and agriculture markets in 2015. We produced 516,000 tons and 670,000 tons during 2015 and 2014, respectively, at this facility. Adjacent to this mill, we have a bar finishing facility, with an annual capacity of 260,000 tons, which provides various downstream finishing operations for our SBQ steel bars. Processing operations include turning, polishing, straightening, chamfering, precision saw-cutting and heat-treating capabilities. In addition,


Table of Contents

non-destructive testing services are available, including eddy current, flux leakage and ultrasonic inspection. Vulcan Threaded Products, Inc. (Vulcan), produces threaded rod product, and cold drawn and heat treated bar, creating strategic pull-through demand of special-bar-quality products provided from our Engineered Bar Products Division. 

Our Roanoke Bar Division sellsprimarily produces merchant bar products, including angles, merchant rounds, flats, channels, and reinforcing barsbar. We expect in early 2018to complete our $28 million rolling line expansion project to utilize existing excess melting and billets. During 2015 and 2014, respectively, Roanoke Bar Division produced 536,000 and 601,000casting capability to produce approximately 200,000 tons of billetsreinforcing bar, with multi-strand slitting and 389,000 tons and 432,000 tons of finished steel products.finishing capabilities, making us the largest independent reinforcing bar producer in the region.

Steel of West Virginia primarily sells beams, channels and specialty steel sections. Unlike most other mills, Steel of West Virginiasections, and frequently performs fabrication and finishing operations on its products, such as cutting to length, additional straightening, hole punching, shot blasting, welding, coating, and coating.new in 2017 galvanizing. Through this additional finishing, we create custom finished products that are generally placed directly into our customers'customers’ assembly operations.

9


We produced 295,000 tons and 294,000 tons of various merchant and structuralthe following long steel products at Steel of West Virginia during 2015 and 2014, respectively.these facilities (tons):



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

2017

 

2016

 

2015

 

 



Structural and Rail Division

1,353,699 

 

1,298,724 

 

1,204,953 

 

 



     Rail production (included above)

250,921 

 

238,410 

 

269,268 

 

 



Engineered Bar Products Division

698,951 

 

480,243 

 

516,097 

 

 



Roanoke Bar Division - finished

400,465 

 

405,434 

 

388,914 

 

 



Roanoke Bar Division - billets

507,789 

 

536,512 

 

536,098 

 

 



Steel of West Virginia

285,397 

 

289,114 

 

295,380 

 

 

Customers. The principal customers for our structural steel products are steel service centers, steel fabricators and various manufacturers. Service centers, though not the ultimate end-user, provide valuable mill distribution functions to the fabricators and manufacturers, including small quantity sales, repackaging, cutting, preliminary processing and warehousing. The steel rail marketplace in the United States, Canada and Mexico is specialized and defined, with seven Class I railroads and a large distribution network. We supply rail in 80 feet lengths and Continuous Welded Rail (CWR) in lengths up to 1,600 feet throughout North America.

SBQ products are principally consumed by cold finishers, forgers, intermediate processors, OEM manufacturers, steel service centers, and distributors.distributors, as well as pull through volume to Vulcan. Our MBQ products are sold primarily to steel service centers, as well as rebarreinforcing bar distributors, joist producers, and OEMs. Some of the excess steel billet production at the Roanoke Bar Division is sold to mills without sufficient melting capacities, including our Steel of West Virginia facility. Our steel fabrication operations also purchase angles from Roanoke Bar Division. Steel of West Virginia'sVirginia’s customers are primarily OEMs producing truck trailers, industrial lift trucks, merchant products, guardrail posts, manufactured housing, mining, and off-highway construction equipment. Steel of West Virginia'sVirginia’s flexible manufacturing capabilities enable us to meet demand for a variety of custom-ordered and designed products. Many of these products are produced in small quantities for low volume end usesend-uses resulting in a wide variety of customers, the largest of which are in the truck trailer and industrial lift truck industries.

Steel Competition. Our structural steel products competeThe markets in which we conduct business are highly competitive with various electric arc furnace structural steelmakers, somean abundance of which have cost structures and flexible management cultures similar to our own, and we compete with alternative structural and manufacturing materials. We also believe, however, that both geography and product choice play significant roles. There are currently no other structural mills locatedcompetition in the Midwest, onecarbon steel industry from North American and foreign integrated and mini-mill steelmaking and processing operations.  We compete in numerous industry sections, most significantly tied to the construction, automotive, and other manufacturing sectors.  In many applications within these industry sections, steel competes with other materials, such as aluminum, cement, composites, plastics, carbon fiber, glass and wood.  Some of the largest structuralour products are commodities, subject to their own cyclical fluctuations in supply and demand.  However, we are focused on providing a broader range of diversified value-added products that de-emphasize commodity steel. The primary competitive influences on products we sell are price, quality and value-added services.

Global steelmaking capacity exceeds global consumption of steel consuming regionsproducts.  Such excess capacity sometimes results in steel manufacturers in certain countries exporting steel at prices that are lower than prevailing domestic prices, and sometimes at or below their cost to produce.  Excessive imports of steel in the U.S.,United States, such as in 2017 and we provide customer service benefits to service centers, fabricators and manufacturers locatedmore so in the region. We provide a broad product mix, focusing2015, intensifies price competition on the mid-range and larger sections served only by a few other competitors from locations more remote than our facility. Most of Canada's structural steel consumption is located in Canada's eastern provinces, closer to us than our two largest competitors.

        At present, the rail market is principally served by two other domestic producers who have the capability to produce either standard or premium rail. However, they are limited to producing rail in 80 feet lengths and do not own welding operations. We can produce rail in lengths up to 320 feet and weld to lengths of 1,600 feet, requiring far fewer welds for our rail customers. There are currently no rail producers in Canada or Mexico. Global competitors include high quality integrated and electric arc furnace steel producers in Europe and Asia.

        Our Engineered Bar Division competes with a number of other domestic producers of SBQ and MBQ. We are among the largest and most diversified suppliers of engineered SBQ in North America. Our customer service, centralized geographic location, just-in-time delivery and Vendor Management


Table of Contents

Inventory program further differentiates us from other suppliers. Roanoke Bar Division competes primarily with several domestic steel manufactures. Steel West Virginia competes in the specialty shape products market with other domesticindustry which negatively affects our ability to increase our selling prices, and European operations by being able to provide small quantity niche products unique to our customer manufacturing capabilities.

IRON DYNAMICS (IDI)realize higher margins and profitability. 

IDI produces liquid pig iron and hot briquetted iron (HBI) that serves as a substitute for a portion of the metallic raw material mix that goes directly into our Butler Flat Roll Division electric arc furnaces to produce steel. Direct reduced iron (DRI) is a metallic product made from mill scale and other iron waste products that have been reduced in a rotary hearth furnace, using natural gas and coal. The reduction method employed by IDI uses coal as the reducing agent. The DRI is either compacted by briquetters to form HBI, or is processed further to produce liquid pig iron. HBI can be immediately used in our melting furnaces or stockpiled for later use. Liquid pig iron is tapped from IDI's submerged arc furnace and immediately transferred in ladles to the adjacent Butler Flat Roll Division mill, where it is combined with ferrous scrap in their electric arc furnaces.

        IDI's primary focus is to maximize liquid pig iron production, due to the inherent economic benefits achieved at the steel mill when the material is used in the steelmaking process, such as reduced energy cost, reduced materials cost, and quicker melting cycles. During 2015 and 2014, respectively, IDI produced 245,000 and 250,000 metric tons, of which 98% and 93%, was liquid pig iron. We have used and plan to continue to use all of the facility's output internally.

Metals Recycling Operations Segment



The metals recycling operations consists solely of OmniSource and includes both ferrous and nonferrous scrap metal processing, transportation, marketing, and brokerage and consulting services in approximately 75 locations, strategically located primarily in close proximity to our steel mills and other end-user scrap consumers throughout the Midwest and Southeast portioneastern half of the United States.  In addition, OmniSource designs, installs, and manages customized scrap management programs for industrial manufacturing companies at over 600hundreds of locations throughout North America. Our metals recycling operations accounted for 19%, 25%, and 31%15% of our consolidated net sales during 2017 and 2016 and 19% in 2015, 2014, and 2013, respectively.2015. Our steel mills utilize a portion of the ferrous scrap processed through OmniSource as raw material in our steelmaking operations, and the remainder is sold to other consumers, such as other steel manufacturers and foundries. This strategic symbiotic relationship with our own steelmaking operations provides valuable pull-through demand to OmniSource'sOmniSource’s ferrous scrap operations. In 2017,  2016, and 2015, 2014, and 2013, OmniSource suppliedprovided our steel millsoperations with approximately 37%38%, 44%40%, and 45%41%, respectively, of its ferrous scrap requirements.

We shipped the tons of their ferrous raw material requirements, representing approximately 54%, 48%, and 44%, respectively, of OmniSource's 2015, 2014, and 2013, ferrous shipped tons.following from our metals recycling operations:

OmniSource sold approximately 5.1 million gross tons and 5.6 million gross tons of ferrous material, during 2015 and 2014, respectively, and approximately 1.1 billion pounds and 1.2 billion pounds of nonferrous material, during 2015 and 2014, respectively. During 2015 and 2014, approximately 8% and 7%, respectively, of OmniSource's revenue were from export sales primarily from nonferrous materials.



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

2017

 

2016

 

2015

 

 



Ferrous metal total (gross tons)

4,952,973 

 

5,070,380 

 

5,139,506 

 

 



     Shipments to our steel mills

3,108,858 

 

3,112,616 

 

2,755,218 

 

 



     Percent of total to our steel mills

63% 

 

61% 

 

54% 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



Nonferrous metals (thousands of pounds)

1,086,799 

 

1,103,505 

 

1,082,777 

 

 

10

 


We sell various grades of processed ferrous scrap primarily to steel mills and foundries.  Ferrous scrap metal is the primary raw material for electric arc furnaces, such as our steel mills.  In addition, we sell various grades of nonferrous metals such as copper, brass, aluminum and stainless steel, to aluminum, steel and ingot manufacturers, brass and bronze ingot makers, copper refineries and mills, smelters, specialty mills, alloy manufacturers, and other consumers.


Table of Contents

We purchase ferrous and nonferrous scrap metals, processed and unprocessed, in a variety of forms for our metals recycling facilities.

Ferrous scrap comes from two primary sources:

·

Manufacturers and industrial plants, metal fabrication plants, machine shops and factories, which generate ferrous scrap referred to as prompt or industrial scrap, and

·

Scrap dealers, retail individuals, auto wreckers, demolition firms and others who provide steel and iron scrap, referred to as “obsolete” scrap. Obsolete scrap includes scrap recycled from end-of-life automobiles, appliances, railroad cars and railroad track materials, agricultural machinery and demolition scrap from obsolete structures, containers and machines and represents a significant source of scrap generation.

Nonferrous scrap comes from three primary sources:

·

Manufacturers and other nonferrous scrap sources, which generate or sell scrap aluminum, copper, stainless steel, and other nonferrous metals,

·

Producers of electric wire, telecommunication service providers, aerospace, defense and recycling companies that generate nonferrous scrap consisting primarily of copper wire, aluminum beverage cans, and various other metals and alloys, and

·

Retail individuals who sell material directly to our facilities, which they collect from a variety of sources.

We do not purchase a significant amount of scrap metal from a single source or from a limited number of major sources.  Market demand and the composition, quality, size, weight, and location of the materials are the primary factors that determine prices.

Products.Our metals recycling operations primarily involve the purchase, processing, and resale of ferrous and nonferrous scrap metals into reusable forms and grades.  We process an array of ferrous products through a variety of methods, including sorting, shredding, shearing, cutting, torching, baling, briquetting, and breaking. Our major ferrous products include heavy melting steel, busheling, bundled scrap, shredded scrap and other scrap metal products, such as steel turnings and cast iron. These products vary in properties or attributes related to cleanness, size of individual pieces, and residual alloys. The necessary characteristics of the ferrous products are determined by the specific needs and requirements of the consumer and affect the individual product'sproduct’s relative value. In addition, weWe process various grades of nonferrous products, including aluminum, brass, copper, stainless steel, and other nonferrous metals. Additionally, we provide transportation logistics (truck, rail, and river barge), management services, marketing, brokerage, and consulting services related to the scrap industry.management services.

Customers.We sell various grades of processed ferrous scrap to end-users, such as electric arc furnace steel mills, integrated steelmakers, foundries, secondary smelters, and metal brokers, who aggregate materials for other large users. Ferrous scrap metal is the primary raw material for electric arc furnaces, such as our steel mills. Most of our ferrous scrap customers purchase processed scrap through negotiated spot sales contracts which establish a quantity purchase for the month. The price we charge for ferrous scrap depends upon market demand and pricing, transportation costs, as well as the quality and grade of the scrap. We sell various grades of processed nonferrous scrap to end-users such as aluminum sheet and ingot manufacturers, brass and bronze ingot makers, copper refineries, mills, smelters, specialty steelmakers, alloy manufacturers, wire and cable producers, utilities, and telephone networks.  The price we charge for nonferrous scrap depends upon market demand and pricing, transportation costs, as well as the quality and grade of the scrap.

Competition.  Scrap is a global commodity influenced by conditions in a number of industrialized and emerging-marketsemerging markets throughout Asia, Europe and North America. The markets for scrap metals are highly competitive, both in the purchase of raw or unprocessed scrap, and the sale of processed scrap.


Table of Contents

With regard to the purchase of rawunprocessed scrap, we compete with numerous independent recyclers, as well as smaller scrap companies engaged only in collecting obsolete scrap. In many cases, we also purchase unprocessed scrap metal from smaller scrap dealers and other processors. Successful procurement of materials is determined primarily by the price offered by the purchaser for the raw scrap and the proximity of our processing facility to the source of the raw scrap. Both ferrous and nonferrous scrap sells as a commodity in both nationaldomestic and international markets, which are affected, sometimes significantly, by relative economic conditions, currency fluctuations, and the availability and cost of transportation. Competition for sales of processed scrap is based primarily on the price, quality, and location of the scrap metals, as well as the level of service provided in terms of reliability and timing of delivery.

We also face potential competition for sales of processed scrap from other producers of steel products, such as electric arc furnace and integrated steel mills, some of which like us are also vertically integrated in the scrap metals recycling business. In addition, other steel mills may compete with us in attempting to secure scrap supply through direct purchasing from our scrap suppliers. Scrap metal processors also face competition from substitutes for prepared ferrous scrap, such as pre-reduced iron pellets, hot briquetted iron,HBI, pig iron, DRI,direct reduced iron (DRI), and other forms of processed iron. The availability and relative prices of substitutes for ferrous scrap could result in a decreased demand for processed ferrous scrap and could result in lower prices and/or lower demand for our scrap products.

The industry is highly fragmented with many smaller family-owned companies, many regional scrap companies, along with a number of national and global companies, each of which has multiple locations in areas in which OmniSource also operates. No single scrap metals recycler has a significant market share in the domestic market.

        During the fourth quarter of 2015, we determined that the fair market value of OmniSource operations was less than its carrying value, due to the weak global scrap commodity outlook, and thus impaired. As a result, we recorded $428.5 million in pretax non-cash asset impairment charges related to goodwill, trade name, and other related assets.

11


Steel Fabrication Operations Segment



Our steel fabrication operations include eightseven New Millennium Building Systems plants that primarily serve the non-residential construction industry located in Butler, Indiana; Lake City, Florida; Salem, Virginia; Hope, Arkansas; Juarez, Mexico, and Fallon, Nevada; and Memphis, Tennessee and Phoenix, Arizona, which were acquired from CSi on September 14, 2015.throughout the United States.  We have established a national operating footprint that allows us to serve the entire U.S.domestic construction market, as well as national accounts, such as large retail chains.

Steel fabrication operations accounted for 9%, 7%, and 6% of our consolidated net sales during 2015, 2014,2017,  2016, and 2013, respectively.2015. We sold 493,000 tons627,000, 563,000, and 481,000493,000 tons of joist and deck products during 20152017, 2016, and 2014,2015, respectively. Our steel operations supply a substantial portion, (approximatelyapproximately 51%, 59% and 63% in 2017, 2016, and 51% in 2015, and 2014, respectively)respectively, of the steel utilized in our steel fabrication operations, providing strategic pull-through demand.

        Products:Products.  Our steel fabrication operations produce steel building components, including steel joists, girders, trusses (six locations), and steel deck (six(five locations). Our joist products include bowstring, arched, scissor, double-pitcheddouble‑pitched and single-pitchedsingle‑pitched joists. Our deck products include a full range of steel roof, form, and composite floor, deck, and with the 2015 addition of our Tennessee and Arizona plants our product offerings were further expanded to include specialty architectural, deck, floor systems, and bridge deck.


Table of ContentsCustomers and Markets

        Customers..  Our primary steel fabrication operations customers are non-residential steel fabricators. Other customers include metal building companies, general construction contractors, developers, brokers and governmental entities.  Our customers are located throughout the United States, including national accounts.

        Markets.    Our steel fabrication operations primarily serve the non-residential construction industry. The steel joist and deck market in the U.S.United States was approximately 2.0 million, 1.9 million tons, and 1.7 million tons in 2017, 2016, and 2015, and 2014, an increase from 1.5 million tons in 2013,respectively, based on trade association estimates. Based on this information, our steel fabrication operations'operations’ growth rate has outpaced the steel joist and deck market growth resulting in our increasing market share of approximately 31%, 30%,33% in 2017, and 27%,31% in 2015, 20142016 and 2013, respectively.2015. We believe we are well positioned with our expanding national footprint to continue to grow as the non-residential construction market continues to be strong,expand, and we have available capacity that can be deployed as needed.

Competition.  We compete with other North American joist and steel deck producers primarily on the basis of price, quality, customer service, and proximity to the customer.  Our expanding national footprint allows us to service the entire U.S.domestic non-residential construction market, as well as national accounts such as large retail chains, and certain specialty deck customers.

Other Operations



Other operations consists of subsidiary operations that are below the quantitative thresholds required for reportable segments and primarily consist of our idled Minnesota ironmaking operations and several smaller joint ventures. Our Minnesota ironmaking operations consists of our iron nugget production facility, Mesabi Nugget, (owned 82% by us); our iron concentrating operations, Mesabi Mining; and, our iron tailings operations, Mining Resources (owned 81% by us). Also included in "Other"“Other” are certain unallocated corporate accounts, such as the company'scompany’s senior secured credit facility, senior notes, certain other investments and certain profit sharing expenses.expenses

12

 During the fourth quarter of 2014, our Minnesota ironmaking operations reached a steady operating state, indicating a consistency in the operation's production capability, processes and cost structure, including the ability to utilize certain lower-cost raw materials. Given this, we undertook an assessment of the recoverability of the carrying value of our Minnesota ironmaking operation's fixed assets. Given our outlook at that time regarding future operating costs and product pricing, we concluded that the carrying value of these fixed assets was no longer fully recoverable, and the fixed assets were in fact impaired. This assessment resulted in a $260.0 million pretax non-cash impairment charge, including amounts attributable to noncontrolling interests of $46.5 million. Please refer to Note 1 in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in Part II, Item 8 of this Form 10-K for information regarding the asset impairment charge. Given the significant and sustained decline in pig iron pricing, which resulted in the cost of iron nugget production to be meaningfully higher than product selling prices, management and the board of directors elected to indefinitely idle the Minnesota ironmaking operations in May 2015. Upon that decision, and the decision to monetize existing raw material inventory, we recorded an inventory lower-of-cost or market charge of $21.0 million (inclusive of noncontrolling interests of $3.6 million), in cost of goods sold in the second quarter 2015. Operating losses associated with our Minnesota ironmaking operations have been significantly curtailed post-idling.



Table of Contents


Sources, Availability, and Cost of Steel and Other Operations'Operations’ Raw Materials

Scrap Metals. The principal raw material of our steel operations is scrap metal derived from, among other sources "home scrap,"“home scrap”, generated internally at steel mills themselves; industrial scrap, generated as a by-product of manufacturing; and "obsolete"“obsolete” scrap recycled from end-of-life automobiles, appliances, railroad cars and railroad track materials, agricultural machinery and demolition scrap from obsolete structures, containers and machines.

Ferrous scrap typically comprises more than 80% of the metallic melt mix in electric arc furnace steelmaking, in contrast to integrated mill steelmaking, where the proportion of scrap has traditionally been approximately 25% to 35%. Depending upon the scrap substitute material that may be available from time to time, and the relative cost of such material, the percentage of scrap used in our steelmaking operations could be increased or reduced in our metallic melt mix.

Many variables can impact ferrous scrap prices, all of which reflect the pushes and pulls of the supply demand equation. These factors include the level of U.S.domestic steel production (for high-quality,(high quality low-residual scrap is a by-product of steel manufacturing activity), the level of exports of scrap from the United States, and the amount of obsolete scrap production. In addition, domestic ferrous scrap prices generally have a strong correlation and spread to global pig iron pricing. Generally, as domestic steel demand increases, so does scrap demand and resulting scrap prices. The reverse is also normally, but not always, true with scrap prices following steel prices downward when supply exceeds demand. In 2015, domestic steel mill utilization and steel pricing was negatively impacted by record levels of steel imports resulting in lower demand for scrap, forcing ferrous pricing downward throughout the year.

        The price of ferrous scrap, as a commodity, has tended to be volatile, rising and falling with supply, and not always in lock step with or in proportion to the market price of steel. In addition, domestic ferrous scrap prices generally have a strong correlation and spread to global pig iron pricing. Scrap prices declined sharply in 2015 due to domestic scrap competition, the strong U.S.United States dollar tempering scrap exports, decreasing global pig iron prices, and lower steel mill utilization rates resulting from excessive record levels of steel imports. These excess sheet steel imports declined during 2016 with duties levied pursuant to the trade case rulings from the United States International Trade Commission, resulting in increased domestic steel mill utilization, resulting in improved scrap pricing. Steel imports once again rose during 2017, mostly related to structural and decreasing global pig iron prices.pre-fabricated structural long products, but also cold roll and coated sheet steel, causing pressure on steel selling prices in those markets.  However, scrap prices continued to climb in 2017 due to strong domestic steel mill utilization and lower scrap exports, combined with additional supply from DRI projects and prime scrap. When scrap prices greatly accelerate, this challengescan challenge one of the principal elements of an electric arc furnace based steel mill'smill’s traditional lower cost structure—the cost of its metallic raw material.

The following table provides pricing per gross ton from American Metal Market (AMM) and Ryan'sRyan’s Notes (Pig Iron) estimates for ferrous materials used in steel production:


Ferrous Material Pricing


Table of Contents13


Iron Units. In addition to scrap, DRI, hot briquetted iron,HBI, pig iron, and iron nuggets are used in our electric arc furnace steel mill production. During 20152017,  2016, and 2014,2015, we consumed 8.810.3 million,  tons9.9 million and 7.68.8 million tons, respectively, of metallic materials in our steelmaking furnaces, of which, iron units other than scrap, represented approximately 12%13%, 14% and 9%12% of the tons, in 2015 and 2014, respectively. Of these iron substitute units consumed, our Iron Dynamics operationsIDI operation supplies 100% of its production to the Butler Flat Roll Division mill, representing 66%72%, 65% and 62%66% of their iron units in 2017, 2016,  and 2015,  and 2014, respectively.

Energy Resources

Electricity. Electricity is a significant input required in the electric arc furnaces in our steelmaking operations (excluding The Techs)Techs and Vulcan), representing 6%, 7% and 5%6% of steel production costs of goods sold in 20152017, 2016, and 2014,2015, respectively. We have entered into a fixed price interruptible electricity supply agreement that extends through December 31, 2017,contracts for the Butler Flat Roll Division. The contract allows our supplier to interrupt service in the event of an emergency or in response to various market conditions.Division, Columbus Flat Roll Division, Roanoke Bar Division and Steel of West Virginia, have each entered into fixed price contracts, while our Engineered Bar Products Division has a combination of fixed pricing and market pricing for the various components of the electrical services (demand charge, energy charge, riders, etc.). Our Structural and Rail Division purchases electricity at current market prices and through forward contracts at fixed prices.

        Natural Gas.    We purchase a portion of our steelmaking operations' natural gas requirements at market prices and a portion by entering into hedging transactions on the futures markets for ultimate physical delivery in order to help minimize price volatility. These contracts typically have duration of up to 24 months, but on occasion may extend further. Natural gas represented 1.3% and 1.5% of steelmaking operations (excluding The Techs) costs of goods sold in 2015 and 2014, respectively.

Patents and Trademarks

We currently do not own any material patents or patent applications for technologies that are in use in our production processes. We have seventhe following major registered trademarks, as follows:

·

the mark “SDI” and a chevron alone;

·

the mark “SDI” and a chevron and “Steel Dynamics, Inc.” to the right of the chevron;

·

the mark “SDI” and a chevron and “Steel Dynamics” to the right of the chevron;

·

the mark “OmniSource Corporation” with the circle logo design;

·

the slogan “The Best in Metals Recycling”;

·

the mark “The Techs”; and

·

the mark “New Millennium Building Systems, LLC.”

Research and Development

Our research and development activities have consisted of efforts to expand, develop orand improve our products and operating processes, and our efforts to develop and improve alternative ironmaking technologies through Iron Dynamics and, prior to idling, our Minnesota ironmaking operations.IDI. Most of these research and development efforts have been conducted in-house by our employees.

Environmental Matters

Our operations are subject to substantial and evolving local, state, and federal environmental, health and safety laws and regulations concerning, among other things, emissions to the air, discharges


Table of Contents

to surface and ground water and to sewer systems, and the generation, handling, storage, transportation, treatment and disposal of solid and hazardous wastes.wastes and secondary materials. Our manufacturing operations are dependent upon permits regulating discharges into the air or into the water or the use and handling of by-products in order to operate our facilities. We dedicate considerable resources aimed at achieving material compliance with federal and state laws concerning the environment.  While we do not currently believe that our future compliance efforts with such provisions will have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, cash flows or financial condition, this is subject to change in the evolvingever-evolving regulatory environment in which we operate.

Since the level of enforcement of environmental laws and regulations, or the nature of those laws that may be enacted from time to time are subject to changing social or political pressures, our environmental capital expenditures and costs for environmental compliance may increase in the future. In addition, due to the possibility of unanticipated regulatory or other developments, the amount and timing of future environmental expenditures may vary substantially from those currently anticipated. The cost of current and future environmental compliance may also place U.S.United States steel producers at a competitive disadvantage with respect to foreign steel producers, which may not be required to undertake equivalent costs in their operations.

14


Pursuant to the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act, or RCRA, which governs the treatment, handling and disposal of solid and hazardous wastes, the United States Environmental Protection Agency, or U.S.United States EPA, and authorized state environmental agencies may conduct inspections to identify alleged violations or areas where there may have been releases of solid or hazardous constituents into the environment and require the facilities to take corrective action to remediate any such releases. RCRA also allows citizens to bring certain suits against regulated facilities for potential damages and cleanup. Our steelmaking and certain other facilities generate wastes subject to RCRA. Our manufacturing operations produce various by-products, some of which, for example electric arc furnace or EAF dust, are often categorized as solid or hazardous waste, requiring special handling for disposal or for the recovery of metallics. We collect such by-products in pollution controlledcontrol equipment, such as baghouses, and either recycle or appropriately dispose of these by-products. While we cannot predict the future actions of the regulators or other interested parties, the potential exists for required corrective action at these facilities, the costs of which could be substantial.

Under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability, Act,known as “CERCLA” or CERCLA,“Superfund,” the U.S.United States EPA and, in some instances, private parties have the authority to impose joint and several liability for the remediation of contaminated properties upon generators of waste, current and former site owners and operators, transporters and other potentially responsible parties, regardless of fault or the legality of the original disposal activity. Many states have statutes and regulatory authorities similar to CERCLA and to the U.S.United States EPA. We have a number of material handling agreements with various contractors to properly dispose of or recycle our electric arc furnace dust and certain other by-products of our operations. However, we cannot assure that, even if there has been no fault by us, we may not still be cited as a waste generator by reason of an environmental cleanup at a site to which our by-products were transported.

The Clean Water Act and similar state laws apply to aspects of our operations and impose regulatory burdensrestrictions related to the discharge of wastewater, stormwaterstorm water and dredged or fill material.  U.S.United States EPA, states and, in certain instances, private parties have the ability to bring suit alleging violations and seeking penalties and damages.  The Clean Water Act'sAct’s provisions can require new or expanded water treatment investments to be made and can limit or even prohibit certain current or planned activities at our operations.

The Clean Air Act and analogous state laws require many of our facilities to obtain and maintain air permits in order to operate.  Air permits can impose new or expanded obligations to limit or prevent current or future emissions and to add costly pollution control equipment. Enforcement for alleged violations can be brought


Table of Contents

by U.S.the United States EPA, the states, and in certain instance,instances private parties, and can result in large penalties and injunctive relief.

In addition, there are a number of other environmental, health and safety laws and regulations that apply to our facilities and may affect our operations. By way of example and not of limitation, certain portions of the federal Toxic Substances Control Act, Oil Pollution Act, Safe Drinking Water Act and Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know Act, as well as state and local laws and regulations implemented by the regulatory agencies, apply to aspects of our facilities'facilities’ operations. In some instances, we may also be subject to foreign governments’ regulations and international treaties and laws. Many of these laws allow both the governments and citizens to bring certain suits against regulated facilities for alleged environmental violations. Finally, any steelmaking and metals recycling companyour operations could be subject to certain toxic tort suits brought by citizens or other third parties alleging causes of action such as nuisance, negligence, trespass, infliction of emotional distress, or other claims alleging personal injury or property damage.

Employees

We emphasize decentralized decision-makingdecision making and responsibility and have established performance-based incentive compensation programs specifically designed to enhance productivity, improve profitability, control costs and foster innovation. Our work force consisted of approximately 7,5007,635 full time employees at December 31, 2015,2017, of which approximately 9% were represented by collective bargaining agreements. The largest group of unionized employees is at Steel of West Virginia. The remaining unionized employees are located in fivefour different OmniSource metals recycling locations, each of which has its own agreement. We believe that our relationship with our employees is good.

Available Information

Our internet website address ishttp://www.steeldynamics.com. We make available on our internet website, under "Investors,"“Investors,” free of charge, as soon as reasonably practicable after such materials are electronically filed with, or furnished to, the Securities and Exchange Commission, our Annual Report on Form 10-K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, Current Reports on Form 8-K and amendments to those reports, as well as press releases, ownership reports pursuant to Section 16(a) of the Securities Act of 1933, our Code of Ethics for Principal Executive Officers and Senior Financial Officers, our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics, and any amendments thereto to or waivers thereof, as well as our Audit, Compensation and Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee Charters. We do not intend to incorporate the contents of our or any other website into this report.


Table of Contents

ITEM 1A.    RISK FACTORS
15

 


ITEM 1A.    RISK FACTORS

Many factors could have an effect on our financial condition, cash flows and results of operations. We are subject to various risks resulting from changing economic, environmental, political, industry, business and financial conditions. The factors described below represent our principal risks.

Risks Related to our Industry

Global steelmaking overcapacity and imports of steel into the United States have adversely affected, and may continue to adversely affect, United States steel prices, which may adversely affect our business, results of operations, financial condition and cash flows.

Global steelmaking capacity currently exceeds global consumption of steel products, which adversely affects United States and global steel prices. Such excess capacity sometimes results in steel manufacturers in certain countries exporting steel and steel products, including pre-fabricated long-product steel, at prices that are lower than prevailing domestic prices, and sometimes at or below their cost of production. Excessive imports of steel and steel products, including pre-fabricated steel, into the United States, such as in recent years, have exerted, and may continue to exert, downward pressure on United States steel and steel products prices, which adversely affects our business, results of operations, financial condition and cash flows. Furthermore, anticipated additional domestic steel capacity could increase this global overcapacity.  This, in turn, may also adversely impact domestic demand for ferrous scrap and our ferrous metallics margins.  United States steel producers compete with many foreign producers, including those in China, Vietnam and other Asian and European countries. Competition from foreign producers is typically strong and is periodically exacerbated by weakening of the economies of certain foreign steelmaking countries. Additionally, low iron ore prices, resulting in disruption of the scrap price correlation to iron ore, leads to reduced global costs to produce steel, further depressing steel import prices.  A higher volume of steel exports to the United States tend to occur at depressed prices when steel producing countries experience periods of economic difficulty, decreased demand for steel products or excess capacity. The global steelmaking overcapacity is exacerbated by Chinese steel production capacity that far exceeds that country’s demand and has made China a major global exporter of steel, resulting in weakened global steel pricing than otherwise would be expected.

In addition, we believe the downward pressure on, and periodically depressed levels of, United States steel prices in recent years have been further accentuated through imports of steel involving dumping and subsidy abuses by foreign steel producers. Some foreign steel producers are owned, controlled or subsidized by foreign governments. As a result, decisions by these producers with respect to their production, sales and pricing are sometimes influenced to a greater degree by political and economic policy considerations than by prevailing market conditions, realities of the marketplace or consideration of profit or loss. However, while some tariffs, duties and quotas have been put into effect for certain steel products imported from a number of countries that have been found to have been unfairly pricing steel imports to the United States, some foreign steel subject to these duties, tariffs and quotas circumvent the penalties by processing in or transporting through a foreign country not subject to the penalties.  Additionally, there is no assurance that already imposed tariffs, duties and quotas will remain in place or that new ones, even if justified, will be levied and even when imposed many of these are only short-lived. When such tariffs, duties or quotas expire or if others are further relaxed or repealed, or if relatively higher United States steel prices make it attractive for foreign steelmakers to export their steel products to the United States, despite the presence of duties, tariffs or quotas, the resurgence of substantial imports of foreign steel could create downward pressure on United States steel prices.

Our industry, as well as the industries of many of our customers and suppliers upon whom we are dependent, is affected by domestic and global economic factors including theperiods of slower than anticipated and uneven recovery from the recent recessioneconomic growth and the risk of a new recession.

Our financial results are substantially dependent not only upon overall economic conditions in the United States inand globally, including Europe and in Asia, but also as they may affect one or more of the industries upon which we depend for the sale of our products. TheGlobal actions, including political actions, could result in changing economic conditions in the United States and globally, the effects of which are not known at this time.  Additionally, periods of slower than anticipated and uneven recovery from the recent recessioneconomic growth could stifle improvingreduce customer confidence and adversely affect demand for our products and further adversely affect our business.business, results of operations, financial condition and cash flows. Metals industries have historically been vulnerable to significant declines in consumption and product pricing during periods of economic downturn or continued uncertainty, including the pace of domestic non-residential construction activity.

Our business is also dependent upon certain industries, such as construction, automotive, construction, manufacturing, transportation, heavy and agriculture equipment, and pipe and tube (including OCTG) markets, and these industries are also cyclical in nature. Therefore, these industries may experience their own fluctuations in demand for our products based on such things as economic conditions, raw material and energy prices,costs, consumer demand and infrastructure funding decisions by governments. Many of these factors are beyond our control. As a result of volatility in our industry or in the industries we serve, we may have difficulty increasing or maintaining our level of sales or profitability. If our industry or the industries we serve were to suffer a downturn, then we may experience an adverse effect on our business, results of operations, financial condition and cash flows.

16


A prospective decline in consumer and business confidence and spending, which is often coupled with reductions in the availability of credit or increased cost of credit, as well as volatility in the capital and credit markets, could adversely affect the business and economic environment in which we operate and the profitability of our business. We are also exposed to risks associated with the creditworthiness of our suppliers and customers. If the availability of credit to fund or support the continuation and expansion of our customers’ business operations is curtailed or if the cost of that credit is increased the resulting inability of our customers or of their customers to either access credit or absorb the increased cost of that credit could adversely affect our business by reducing our sales or by increasing our exposure to losses from uncollectible customer accounts. A disruption of the credit markets could also result in financial instability of some of our suppliers and customers. The consequences of such adverse effects could include the interruption of production at the facilities of our customers, the reduction, delay or cancellation of customer orders, delays or interruptions of the supply of raw materials we purchase, and bankruptcy of customers, suppliers or other creditors. Any of these events may be adversely affected.affect our business, results of operations, financial condition and cash flows.

Our level of production and our sales and earnings are subject to significant fluctuations as a result of the cyclical nature of the steel industry and some of the industries we serve.

The steel manufacturing business is cyclical in nature, and the selling price of the steel we make may fluctuate significantly due to many factors beyond our control. Furthermore, manya number of our products are commodities, subject to their own cyclical fluctuations in supply and demand in both metal consuming and metal generating industries, including the construction industry.and manufacturing industries. The timing, magnitude and duration of these cycles and the resulting price fluctuations are difficult to predict. The sale of our manufactured steel products is directly affected by demand for our products in other cyclical industries, such as construction, automotive, construction, manufacturing, transportation, heavy and agriculture equipment, and pipe and tube (including OCTG) markets. Economic difficulties, stagnant or slow global economies, supply/demand imbalances and currency fluctuations in the United States or globally could decrease the demand for our products or increase the amount of imports of steel into the United States, which could decrease our sales, margins and profitability.

The scrap metal recycling industry has historically been, and is expected to remain, highly cyclical and this could have a material adverse effect on our metals recycling operations'operations’ results.

Scrap metal prices have become increasinglyremain volatile, and operating results within the metals recycling industry in general have historically been, cyclical, and are expected to remain, highly cyclical in nature. Similarly, but not necessarily paralleling the price fluctuations in the steel business, the purchase prices for automobile bodies and various other grades of obsolete and industrial scrap, as well as the selling prices for processed and recycled scrap metals we utilize in our own manufacturing process, or which we resell to others through our metals recycling operations, are also highly volatile. During periods of excess domestic supply or increased imports, scrap metal prices may become or remain depressed and adversely affect the sales, profitability and margins of our scrap business. As a metals recycler, we may attempt to respond


Table of Contents

to changing recycled metal selling prices by adjusting the scrap metal purchase prices we pay to others, but our ability to do this may be limited by competitive or other factors during periods of low scrap prices, when inbound scrap flow may slow considerably, as scrap generators hold on to their scrap in hopes of getting higher prices later. As such, a prolonged period of low scrap prices could reduce our ability to obtain, process, and sell recycled materials, and this could adversely affect our metals recycling operations'operations’ results. Due to the weak global scrap commodity outlook, during the fourth quarter of 2015, as a part of our annual goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible asset assessment, it was determined that the fair market value of our metals recycling operations was less than its carrying value. This led to the determination that the book value of the metals recycling operations was impaired, resulting in pretax non-cash asset impairment charges related to goodwill, trade name, and other assets of $428.5 million. Conversely, periodic increased foreign demand for scrap can result in an outflow of available domestic scrap, as well as resulting higher scrap prices domestically that cannot always be passed on to domestic scrap consumers, thereby further reducing available domestic scrap flows and scrap margins, all of which could adversely affect our sales and profitability of our scrap business.metals recycling operations. Additionally, during periods of high demand and resulting higher scrap prices, ferrous scrap consumers may seek and develop ferrous scrap alternatives, including pig iron and direct reduced iron.DRI. The availability and pricing of these scrap alternatives in the domestic market may have a longer term impact on scrap pricing, particularly in prime grades, which could adversely affect our sales, profitability and margins.

Imports of steel into the United States have adversely affected, and may again adversely affect, United States steel prices, which could impact our sales, margins and profitability.

        Global steelmaking capacity currently exceeds global consumption of steel products. Such excess capacity sometimes results in steel manufacturers in certain countries exporting steel at prices that are lower than prevailing domestic prices, and sometimes at or below their cost of production. Excessive imports of steel into the United States, such as in 2015 and 2014, have exerted, and may continue to exert, downward pressure on U.S. steel prices which negatively affects our ability to increase our sales, margins, and profitability. This may also adversely impact domestic demand for ferrous scrap and our ferrous metallics margins. U.S. steel producers compete with many foreign producers, including those in China. Competition from foreign producers is typically strong and is periodically exacerbated by weakening of the economies of certain foreign steelmaking countries. A higher volume of steel exports to the U.S. tend to occur at depressed prices when steel producing countries experience periods of economic difficulty, decreased demand for steel products or excess capacity.

        In addition, we believe the downward pressure on, and periodically depressed levels of U.S. steel prices in recent years have been further exacerbated by imports of steel involving dumping and subsidy abuses by foreign steel producers. Some foreign steel producers are owned, controlled or subsidized by foreign governments. As a result, decisions by these producers with respect to their production, sales and pricing are sometimes influenced to a greater degree by political and economic policy considerations than by prevailing market conditions, realities of the marketplace or consideration of profit or loss. However, while some tariffs and quotas have recently been put into effect for certain steel products imported from a number of countries that have been found to have been unfairly pricing steel imports to the U.S., there is no assurance that tariffs and quotas will always be levied, even if otherwise justified, and even when imposed many of these are only short-lived. When such tariffs or duties expire or if others are further relaxed or repealed, or if relatively higher U.S. steel prices make it attractive for foreign steelmakers to export their steel products to the U.S., despite the presence of duties or tariffs, the resurgence of substantial imports of foreign steel could create downward pressure on U.S. steel prices.


Table of Contents

China's current steelmaking overcapacity in relation to its steel consumption could have a material adverse effect on domestic and global steel pricing and could result in increased steel imports into the United States.

        The significant growth of new Chinese steel production capacity that began in the 2000s, coupled with the slowdown in Chinese steel consumption, has resulted in Chinese steel production capacity that far exceeds that country's current demand and has made China a major global exporter of steel. This combination of a slowdown in China's economic growth and steel consumption and its own expansion of steelmaking capacity generally results in a weakening of steel pricing. Should Chinese steelmaking capacity remain the same or further increase in relation to its demand, China might not only remain a net exporter of steel, but many Asian and European steel producers whose steel output previously fed China's steel import needs could redirect their steel into the U.S. market through increased steel imports, causing a further erosion of margins or negatively impacting our ability to increase our prices.

The recent global economic downturn and the difficult conditions in the global industrial, capital and credit markets that resulted, have adversely affected and may continue to adversely affect our industry, as well as the industries of many of our customers and suppliers upon whom we are dependent.

        Many of the markets in which our customers participate, such as automotive, construction, manufacturing, transportation, heavy and agriculture equipment, and pipe and tube (including OCTG) markets, are cyclical in nature and experience significant fluctuations in demand for our steel products based on economic conditions, consumer demand, raw material and energy costs, and decisions by our government to fund or not fund infrastructure projects such as highways, bridges, schools, energy plants, railroads and transportation facilities. Many of these factors are beyond our control. These markets are highly competitive, to a large extent driven by end-use markets, and may experience overcapacity, all of which may affect demand for and pricing of our products.

        A decline in consumer and business confidence and spending, together with reductions in the availability of credit or increased cost of credit, as well as volatility in the capital and credit markets, could adversely affect the business and economic environment in which we operate and the profitability of our business. We are also exposed to risks associated with the creditworthiness of our suppliers and customers. If the availability of credit to fund or support the continuation and expansion of our customers' business operations is curtailed or if the cost of that credit is increased the resulting inability of our customers or of their customers to access either credit or absorb the increased cost of that credit could adversely affect our business by reducing our sales or by increasing our exposure to losses from uncollectible customer accounts. A renewed disruption of the credit markets could also result in financial instability of some of our suppliers and customers. The consequences of such adverse effects could include the interruption of production at the facilities of our customers, the reduction, delay or cancellation of customer orders, delays or interruptions of the supply of raw materials we purchase, and bankruptcy of customers, suppliers or other creditors. Any of these events may adversely affect our profitability, cash flow, and financial condition.

Volatility and major fluctuations in scrap metal, and pig iron, zinc and graphite electrode prices and availability, and our potential inability to pass higher costs on to our customers may constrain operating levels and reduce profit margins.

Steel producers require large amounts of raw materials, including scrap metal and scrap substitute products such as pig iron, pelletized iron and other supplies such as zinc, graphite electrodes and ferroalloys. Our principal raw material is scrap metal derived primarily from junkedend-of-life automobiles, industrial scrap, railroad cars, railroad track materials, agricultural machinery and demolition scrap from obsolete structures, containers and machines. The prices for scrap are subject to market forces largely beyond our control, including demand by U.S.United States and international steel producers, freight costs and speculation. The prices for scrap have varied significantly in the past, may vary significantly in the future and do not necessarily fluctuate in tandem with the price of steel. Moreover, some of our integrated steel producer competitors are not as dependent as we are on scrap as a part of their raw material melt mix, which,


Table of Contents

during periods of high scrap costs relative to the cost of blast furnace iron used by the integrated producers, give them a raw material cost advantage over mini-mills. While our vertical integration into the metals recycling business, through our OmniSource operations, and into the ironmaking business, through our Iron DynamicsIDI facility, should enable us to continue being a cost-effective supplier to our own steelmaking operations, for some of our metallics requirements, we will still need to rely on other metallics and raw material suppliers, as well as upon general industry supply conditions for the balance of our needs. The idling of our Minnesota ironmaking operations in May 2015 may hinder or delay our ability to be a cost-effective supplier to our steelmaking operations during periods of high raw material costs.

Purchase prices for auto bodies, scrap metal and scrap substitute products such as pig iron that we consume, and selling prices for scrap and recycled metals that we sell to third parties are volatile and beyond our control. While OmniSource attempts to respond to changing recycled metal selling prices through adjustments to its metal purchase prices, its ability to do so is limited by competitive and other market factors. Changing prices could potentially impact the volume of scrap metal available to us and the volume and realized margins of processed metals we sell.

17


The availability and prices of raw materials may also be negatively affected by new or existing laws and regulations, allocation by suppliers, interruptions in production, accidents or natural disasters, changes in exchange rates, global price fluctuations, and the availability and cost of transportation.transportation, and competing uses for raw materials.  As a major producer of galvanized steel products, we purchase and consume a large amount of zinc, which is currently at historically high prices, and may have an effect on our profit margins.  Due to its use in other industries, demand for the primary raw material (needle coke) used in the production of graphite electrodes has recently expanded, leading to increased price of graphite electrodes, and possible shortage.  Graphite electrodes are a critical raw material in our steelmaking.  Any inability to secure a consistent supply of graphite electrodes could have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations or prospects.

If prices for ferrous metallics increase by a greater margin than corresponding price increases for the sale of our steel products, we may not be able to recoup such cost increases from increases in the selling prices of steel products. Conversely, depressed prices for ferrous scrap may constrain its supply, which may adversely affect our metals recycling operations and also the availability of certain grades of scrap for our steelmaking operations. Additionally, our inability to pass on all or any substantial part of any cost increases during periods of rapidly rising scrap prices, through scrap or other surcharges, or to provide for our customers'customers’ needs because of the potential unavailability of key raw materials or other inputs, may result in production slow downs or curtailments or may otherwise have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations or prospects.

The cost and availability of electricity and natural gas are also subject to volatile market conditions.

Steel producers like us consume large amounts of energy, inasmuch as mini-mills melt ferrous scrap in electric arc furnaces and use natural gas to reheat steel or steel billets for rolling into finished products. We rely on third parties for the supply of energy resources we consume in our steelmaking activities. The prices for and availability of electricity, natural gas, oil and other energy resources are also subject to volatile market conditions, often affected by weather conditions as well as political and economic factors beyond our control. As large consumers of electricity and gas, we must have dependable delivery in order to operate. Accordingly, we are at risk in the event of an energy disruption.disruption, including power outages or power unavailability. Prolonged black-outsblackouts or brown-outsbrownouts or disruptions caused by natural disasters or by political considerations would substantially disrupt our production. In addition,Since a significant portion of our finished steel products are delivered by truck. Unforeseentruck, unforeseen fluctuations in the price of fuel attributable to fluctuations in crude oil prices would also have a negative impact on our costs or on the costs of many of our customers. In addition, changes in certain environmental regulations in the U.S.,United States, including those that may impose output limitations or higher costs associated with climate change or greenhouse gas emissions legislation could substantially increase the cost of manufacturing and raw materials, such as energy, to us and other U.S.United States steel producers.


Table of Contents

Fluctuations in the value of the United States dollar relative to other currencies may adversely affect our business.

Fluctuations in the value of the dollar can be expected to affect our business. A strong U.S.United States dollar, such as wasrecently experienced, in 2015, makes imported products less expensive, potentially resulting in more imports of steel products into the U.S.United States by our foreign competitors, while a weak U.S.United States dollar may have the opposite impact on imports.

Compliance with and changes in environmental and remediation requirements could result in substantially increased capital requirements and operating costs.

Existing laws or regulations, as currently interpreted or as may be interpreted in the future, as well as future laws or regulations, may have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and financial condition.

We are subject to comprehensive local, state, federal and international statutory and regulatory environmental requirements relating to, among other things:

·

the generation, storage, treatment, handling and disposal of solid and hazardous waste and secondary materials;

·

the discharge of materials into the air, including periodic changes to the National Ambient Air Quality Standards and to emission standards;

·

the management, treatment and discharge of wastewater and storm water;

·

the use and treatment of groundwater;

·

the remediation of soil and groundwater contamination;

·

climate change legislation or regulation;

·

the need for and the ability to timely obtain air, water or other environmental permits;

·

the timely reporting of certain chemical usage, content, storage and releases;

·

the remediation and reclamation of land used for iron mining;

·

natural resource damages; and

·

the protection of our employees’ health and safety.

Compliance with environmental laws and regulations, which affect our steelmaking, metals recycling, ironmaking, and ironmakingcopper and aluminum production operations, is a significant factor in our business. We are required to obtain and comply with environmental permits and licenses, and failure to obtain or renew or the violation of any permit or license could result in substantial fines and penalties, capital expenditures, operational changes, suspension of operations and/or the closure of a subject facility. Similarly, delays, increased costs and/or the imposition of onerous conditions to the securing or renewal of operating permits could have a material adverse effect on these operations.

18


Private parties might also bring claims against us under citizen suit provisions and/or for alleged property damage or personal injury allegedly resulting from the environmental impacts of our operations. Moreover, legal requirements change frequently, are subject to interpretation and have tended to become more stringent over time. Uncertainty regarding adequate pollution control levels, testing and sampling procedures, and new pollution control technology are factors that may increase our future compliance expenditures. We are unable to predict the ultimate cost of future compliance with theseenvironmental requirements or their effect on our operations. Although we work hard to be in substantial compliance with all applicable laws and regulations, legal requirements frequently change and are subject to interpretation. New laws, regulations and changing interpretations by regulatory authorities, together with uncertainty regarding adequate pollution control levels, testing and sampling procedures, and evolving pollution control technologythe application of existing requirements are among the factors that may increase our future expenditures


Table of Contents

to comply with environmental requirements. The cost of complying with existing laws or regulations as currently interpreted or reinterpreted in the future, or with future laws or regulations, may have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and financial condition.

Our manufacturing and metals recycling operations produce significant amounts of by-products, some of which are handled as solid or hazardous waste. For example, our steel mills generate electric arc furnace (EAF) dust, which the United States Environmental Protection Agency (U.S.(United States EPA) and other regulatory authorities classify as hazardous waste and regulate accordingly.accordingly unless recycled in an exempt manner.

In addition, the primary feed materials for the shredders operated by our metals recycling operations include automobile hulksbodies and obsolete household appliances. A portion of the feed materials consist of unrecyclable material known as shredder residue. If laws or regulations, the interpretation of the laws or regulations, or testing methods change with regard to EAF dust or shredder residue or other by-products created by our operations, we may incur significant additional expenditures.

        The Comprehensive Environmental Response, CompensationFederal and Liability Act ("CERCLA" or "Superfund") enablesstate environmental laws enable the U.S.United States EPA, state agencies and certain private parties to recover from owners, operators, generators and transporters the cost of investigation and cleanup of sites at which wastes or hazardous substances were disposed. In connection with CERCLA and analogous statethese laws, we may be required to clean up contamination discovered at our sites including contamination that may have been caused by former owners or operators of the sites, to conduct additional cleanup at sites that have already had some cleanup performed, and/or to perform cleanup with regard to sites formerly used in connection with our operations.

In addition, we may be required to pay for, or to pay a portion of, the costs of cleanup at sites to which we sent materials for disposal or recycling, notwithstanding that the original disposal or recycling activity may have complied with all regulatory requirements then in effect. Pursuant to CERCLA,Under certain laws, a party can be held jointly and severally liable for all of the cleanup costs associated with a disposal site. In practice, a liable party often splits the costs of cleanup with other potentially responsible parties. We have received notices from the U.S.United States EPA, state agencies and third parties that we have been identified as potentially responsible for the cost of investigating and cleaning up a number of disposal sites. In most cases, many other parties are also named as potentially responsible parties.

Because CERCLAcleanup liability can in some cases be imposed retroactively on shipmentsactivities that occurred many years ago, and because the U.S.United States EPA and state agencies are still discovering sites that pose a threat to public health or the environment, we can provide no assurance that we will not become liable for significant costs associated with investigation and remediation of CERCLA cleanup sites.

        CERCLA, including the Superfund Recycling Equity Act of 1999, limits the exposure of scrap metal recyclers for sales of certain recyclable material under certain circumstances. However, the recycling defense is subject to a number of limitations and may be found not to apply to all instances of recycling activity that we conduct.

Increased regulation associated with climate change and greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions could impose significant additional costs on both our steelmaking and metals recycling operations.

The United States government or various governmental agencies may introduce additional regulatory changes in response to the potential impacts of climate change. International treaties or agreements may also result in increasing regulation of greenhouse gasGHG emissions, including the introduction of carbon emissions limitations or trading mechanisms. Any such regulation regarding climate change and greenhouse gas, or GHG emissions, could impose significant costs on our steelmaking and metals recycling operations and on the operations of our customers and suppliers, including increased energy, capital equipment, emissions controls, environmental monitoring and reporting and other costs in order to comply with current or future laws or regulations concerning and limitations imposed on our operations by virtue of


Table of Contents

climate change and GHG emissions laws and regulations. Any adopted future climate change and GHG regulations could negatively impact our ability, (andand that of our customers and suppliers)suppliers, to compete with companies situated in areas not subject to or not complying with such limitations.

From a medium and long-term perspective, we are likely to see an increase in costs relating to our assets that emit significant amounts of greenhouse gases as a result of these regulatory initiatives. These regulatory initiatives may impact our operations directly or through our suppliers or customers. Until the timing, scope and extent of any future regulation becomes known, we cannot predict the effect on our financial condition, operating performance and ability to compete.

Risks Related to the Business

Our senior secured credit facility contains, and any future financing agreements may contain, restrictive covenants that may limit our flexibility.

Restrictions and covenants in our existing debt agreements, including our senior secured credit facility, and any future financing agreements, may impair our ability to finance future operations or capital needs or to engage in other business activities. Specifically, these agreements may limit or restrict our ability to:

 


·

make some investments;

·

create liens on property;

·

make some capital expenditures;

·

enter into transactions with affiliates or related persons;

·

issue or sell stock of certain subsidiaries;

·

sell or transfer assets; and

·

enter into mergers, acquisitions or consolidations, or some joint ventures.

A breach of any of the restrictions or covenants could cause a default under our senior secured credit facility, our senior notes, or our other debt. A significant portion of our indebtedness then may become immediately due and payable if the default is not remedied.

Under our senior secured credit facility, we are required to maintain certain financial covenants tied to our leverage and profitability. Our ability to meet such covenants or other restrictions can be affected by events beyond our control. If a default were to occur, the lenders could elect to declare all amounts then outstanding to be immediately due and payable and terminate all commitments to extend further credit. If we are unable to repay those amounts, the lenders could proceed against the collateral granted to them to secure such indebtedness. We have pledged substantially all of our receivables and inventories and all shares of capital stock or other equity interests of our subsidiaries and intercompany debt held by us as collateral for our senior secured credit facility.


Table of Contents

We may face significant price and other forms of competition from other steel producers, scrap processors and alternative materials, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operation or prospects.

The global markets in which steel companies and scrap processors conduct business are highly competitive and became even more so due to the slow and uneven recovery from the global economic downturn and consolidations in the steel and scrap industries. Additionally, in many applications, steel competes with other materials, such as aluminum, cement, composites, plastics, carbon fiber, glass and wood.  Increased use of alternative materials could decrease demand for steel and combined with increased competition could cause us to lose market share, increase expenditures or reduce pricing, any one of which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations or prospects. The global steel industry suffers from over-capacity,overcapacity, and that excess capacity intensifies price competition infor some of our products. A decrease in the global demand for steel scrap, due to market or other conditions, generally causes a decrease in the price of scrap metals. A decrease in price could result in some scrap generators exiting the marketplace which could further decrease the availability of scrap. This shortage in availability of scrap could have a material adverse effect on both our steelmaking and our metals recycling operations and thus on our business, financial condition, results of operations or prospects.

We are subject to significant risks relating to changes in commodity prices and may not be able to effectively protect against these risks.

We are exposed to commodity price risk during periods where we hold title to scrap metal products that we may hold in inventory for processing or resale. Prices of commodities, including scrap, can be volatile due to numerous factors beyond our control. In an increasing price environment for raw materials, competitive conditions may limit our ability to pass on price increases to our consumers. In a decreasing price environment for processed scrap, we may not have the ability to fully recoup the cost of raw materials that we procure, process, and sell to our customers. In addition, new entrants into the market areas we serve could result in higher purchase prices for raw materials and lower margins from our scrap. WeWhile we typically hedge certain commodities in which the futures market is well developed, we have not hedged positions in certain commodities such as ferrous scrap, where futures markets are not well established. Thus, our sales and inventory position will be vulnerable to adverse changes in commodity prices, which could materially adversely impact our operating and financial performance.

The profitability of our metals recycling operations depends, in part, on the availabilityAvailability of an adequate source of supply.supply is required for our metals recycling operations.

We procure our scrap inventory from numerous sources. These suppliers generally are not bound by long-term contracts and have no obligation to sell recyclable metal to us. In periods of low industry prices, suppliers may elect to hold recyclable metal to wait for higher prices or intentionally slow their metal collection activities. If a substantial number of suppliers cease selling recyclable metal to us, we will be unable to recycle metal at desired levels and our results of operations and financial condition could be materially adversely affected. In addition, a slowdown of industrial production in the U.S.United States reduces the supply of industrial grades of metal to the metal recycling industry, resulting in our having less recyclable metal available to process and market.

We are subject to cybersecurity threats and may face risks to the security of our information technology.

Increased global cybersecurity and information technology security requirements, vulnerabilities, threats and a rise in sophisticated and targeted cybercrime pose a risk to the security and functionality of our systems, our information networks, and to the confidentiality, availability and integrity of sensitive data, including intellectual property, proprietary information, financial information, customer, supplier and business partner information, and personally identifiable information, any of which could have materially adverse economic consequences.  Additionally, such cybersecurity vulnerabilities or attacks could result in an interruption of the functionality of our automated and electronically controlled manufacturing operating systems, which, if compromised, could cease, threaten, delay or slow down our ability to melt, roll or otherwise process steel or any of our other products for the duration of such interruption, which could have materially adverse economic consequences.

20


Although we believe we have adopted procedures and controls to adequately protect our sensitive data, networks and information and operating technology and systems, there can be no assurance that a system or network failure, or cybersecurity breach, will be prevented, whether due to attacks by cyber criminals or due to employee error or malfeasance. This could lead to system interruption, production delays or downtimes and operational disruptions, and the disclosure, modification or destruction of sensitive data, which could have an adverse effect on our reputation, customer, supplier and business partner relationships, financial results and results of operations, and could result in litigation or regulatory investigations or actions.  Additionally, as cybersecurity threats continue to evolve and become more sophisticated, we may need to invest additional resources to protect the security of our systems and information networks.

We may face risks associated with the implementation of our growth strategy.

Our growth strategy subjects us to various risks. As part of our growth strategy, we may expand existing facilities, enter into new product or process initiatives, acquire or build additional plants, acquire other businesses and assets, enter into joint ventures, or form strategic alliances that we believe


Table of Contents

will complement our existing business. These transactions will likely involve some or all of the following risks:

·

the risk of entering product or geographic markets in which we have little experience;

·

the difficulty of competing for acquisitions and other growth opportunities with companies having materially greater financial resources than us;

·

the inability to realize anticipated synergies or other expected benefits;

·

the difficulty of integrating the new or acquired operations and personnel into our existing operations;

·

the potential disruption of ongoing operations;

·

the diversion of financial resources to new operations or acquired businesses;

·

the diversion of management attention from other business concerns to new operations or acquired businesses;

·

the loss of key employees, customers or suppliers of acquired businesses;

·

the potential exposure to unknown liabilities;

·

the inability of management to maintain uniform standards, controls, procedures and policies;

·

the difficulty of managing the growth of a larger company;

·

the risk of becoming involved in labor, commercial, or regulatory disputes or litigation related to the new operations or acquired businesses;

·

the risk of becoming more highly leveraged;

·

the risk of contractual or operational liability to other venture participants or to third parties as a result of our participation;

·

the inability to work efficiently with joint venture or strategic alliance partners; and

·

the difficulties of terminating joint ventures or strategic alliances.

These initiatives or transactions might be required for us to remain competitive, but we may not be able to complete any such transactions on favorable terms or obtain financing, if necessary. Future transactions may not improve our competitive position and business prospects as anticipated, and if they do not, our sales and earningsbusiness, financial condition, results of operations or prospects may be significantly reduced.adversely affected.

Impairment charges could adversely affect our results of operations.

        WeOccasionally, assumptions that we have made regarding products or businesses we have acquired or sought to develop about the sustainability of markets we sought to exploit, or about industry conditions that underlie our decision making when we elected to capitalize a venture turn out differently than anticipated.  In such instances, the fair value of such assets may fall below their carrying value recorded on our balance sheet.

Accordingly, we periodically test goodwill, intangible assets and long-lived tangible and intangible assets to determine whether their estimated fair value is in fact less than their value recorded on our balance sheet.  If we determine that the fair value of any of these assets, from whatever cause, is less than the value recorded on our balance sheet, we willare required to incur non-cash asset impairment charges, such as those recorded in current and past years, that could adversely affect our results of operations. There can be no assurances that continued market dynamics or other factors may not result in future impairment charges.

        During the fourth quarter of 2014, we assessed the carrying value of the Minnesota ironmaking operations' fixed assets, and determined that the future estimated cash flow did not support the value in place. Therefore, we recorded a pre-tax, non-cash asset impairment charge of $260 million, and based on our joint venture ownership percentage, reduced consolidated company net income by $132.6 million. Due to a significant and sustained decline in global pig iron pricing, which resulted in the cost of iron nugget production being higher than product selling values, we indefinitely idled our Minnesota ironmaking operations in May 2015.


Table of Contents

        During the fourth quarter of 2015, as a part of our annual goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible asset assessment, it was determined that the fair market value of our metals recycling operations was less than its carrying value, due to the sustained weak global scrap commodity outlook. We determined that the carrying value of the metals recycling operations was impaired, resulting in pretax non-cash goodwill, trade name, and other related asset impairment charges of $428.5 million.

We are subject to litigation and legal compliance risks which could adversely affect our financial condition, results of operations and liquidity.

We are involved along with two other remaining steel manufacturing company defendants, in a class action antitrust suit in federal court in Chicago, Illinois, originally against eight companies. The Complaint alleges a conspiracy on the part of the original defendants to fix, raise, maintain and stabilize the price at which steel products were sold in the United States during a specified period between 2005 and 2007, by artificially restricting the supply of such steel products. All but one of the Complaints were brought on behalf of a purported class consisting of all direct purchasers of steel products. The other Complaint was brought on behalf of a purported class consisting of all indirect purchasers of steel products within the same time period. In addition, another similar complaint was filed in December 2010 purporting to be on behalf of indirect purchasers of steel products in Tennessee. All Complaints have been consolidated in the Chicago action and seek treble damages and costs, including reasonable attorney fees, pre- and post-judgment interest and injunctive relief. Following an extensive period of discovery and related motions concerning class certification matters, the Court, on September 9, 2015, certified a class, limited, however, to the issue of the alleged conspiracy alone, and denied class certification on the issue of antitrust impact and damages. As a result, some additional discovery is ongoing. We have also filed a motion for summary judgment, as has co-defendant SSAB, and this is currently pending.

        Due to the uncertain nature of litigation, we cannot presently determine the ultimate outcome of this litigation. Based on the information available at this time, we have determined that there is not presently a "reasonable possibility" (as that term is defined in ASC 450-20-20), that the outcome of these legal proceedings would have a material impact on our financial condition, results of operations, or liquidity. Although not presently necessary or appropriate to make a dollar estimate of exposure to loss, if any, in connection with the above matter, we may in the future determine that a loss accrual is necessary. Although we may make loss accruals, if and as warranted, any amounts that we may accrue from time to time could vary significantly from the amounts we actually pay, due to inherent uncertainties and the inherent shortcomings of the estimation process, the uncertainties involved in litigation and other factors. Additionally, an adverse result could have a material effect on our financial condition, results of operations and liquidity.

        We are involved in various routine litigation matters, including administrative proceedings, regulatory proceedings, governmental investigations, environmental matters, and commercial and construction contract disputes.disputes, none of which at the present time are expected to have a material impact on our financial conditions, results of operations or liquidity. For additional information regarding legal proceedings please refer to Item 3. Legal Proceedings.

In addition to risks associated with our environmental and other regulatory compliance, our international operations are subject to complex foreign and U.S.United States laws and regulations, including the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, regulations related to import-export controls, the Office of Foreign Assets Control, and other laws and regulations, each of which may increase our cost of doing business and expose us to increased risk.

21


Unexpected equipment downtime or shutdowns could adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects.

Interruptions in our production capabilities could adversely affect our production costs, products available for sale and earnings during the affected period. In addition to equipment failures, our


Table of Contents

facilities are also subject to the risk of catastrophic loss due to unanticipated events such as fires, explosions or violent weather conditions. Our manufacturing processes are dependent upon critical pieces of steelmaking equipment, such as our furnaces, continuous casters and rolling equipment, some of which are controlled by our information technology systems, as well as electrical equipment, such as transformers. This equipment may, on occasion, be out of service as a result of unanticipated failures or other events.events, including cyber attacks or system failures. We have experienced and may in the future experience plant shutdowns or periods of reduced production as a result of such equipment failures or other events. These disruptions could have an adverse effect on our operations, customer service levels,business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects.

We have incurred, and may incur in the future, costs to idle facilities, idled facility carrying costs, or increased costs to resume production at idled facilities.

        Due to a significant and sustained decline in global pig iron pricing, which resulted in the cost of iron nugget production being higher than product selling values, we indefinitely idled ourOur Minnesota ironmaking operations in May 2015. We incurred approximately $34.8 million (inclusive of noncontrolling interest of $5.1 million) of expenses related to the idling, including $21.0 million of non-cash inventory valuation adjustments. We currently incur minor ongoing carrying costs related to theseare indefinitely idled facilities and should we in the future resume production, we would incur furtherincreased costs related to preparing the Minnesota ironmaking operations for operation, performperforming any required repairs and maintenance, and training employees.

Should economic or market conditions dictate, we may in the future idle additional facilities, which may require us to incur additional idling and carrying costs related to those facilities, as well as further increased costs should production be resumed at any idled facility, which could have an adverse effect on our financial results and results of operations.

We may face risks to the security of our information technology.

        Increased global information technology security requirements, vulnerabilities, threats and a rise in sophisticated and targeted cybercrime pose a risk to the security of our systems, our information networks, and to the confidentiality, availability and integrity of our data, as well as to the functionality of our automated and electronically controlled manufacturing operating systems. Although we have adopted procedures and controls to protect our information and operating technology, including sensitive proprietary information and confidential and personal data, there can be no assurance that a system or network failure, or security breach, will be prevented. This could lead to system interruption, production delays or downtimes and operational disruptions, the disclosure, modification or destruction of proprietary and other key information, which could have an adverse effect on our reputation, financial results and results of operations.

Governmental agencies may refuse to grant or renew some of our licenses and permits.

We must receive licenses, air, water and other permits and approvals from state and local governments to conduct certain of our operations or to develop or acquire new facilities. Governmental agencies sometimes resist the establishment of certain types of facilities in their communities, including scrap metal collection and processing facilities. There can be no assurance that future approvals, licenses and permits will be granted or that we will be able to maintain and renew the approvals, licenses and permits we currently hold. Failure to do so could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and financial condition.prospects.

ITEM 1B. ITEM 1B.    UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS



None.


22

Table of Contents


ITEM 2.PROPERTIES ITEM 2.    PROPERTIES

The following table describes our more significant properties as of December 31, 2015.2017. These properties are owned by us and not subject to any significant encumbrances, or are leased by us. We believe these properties are suitable and adequate for our current operations and are appropriately utilized. For additional information regarding our facilities please refer to Item 1.Business.



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

Site

 

Site



 

 

 

 

 

Acreage

 

Acreage

Operations

 

Location

 

Description

 

Owned

 

Leased

Steel Operations Segment *

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Butler Flat Roll Division:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 Butler Operations

 

Butler, IN

 

Flat Roll Steel Mill and Coating Facility

 

1,082 

 

 Jeffersonville Operations

 

Jeffersonville, IN

 

Flat Roll Steel Coating Facility

 

27 

 

10 

Iron Dynamics

 

Butler, IN

 

Liquid Ironmaking Facility

 

25 

 

Columbus Flat Roll Division

 

Columbus, MS

 

Flat Roll Steel Mill and Coating Facility

 

277 

 

1,422 

The Techs

 

Pittsburgh, PA

 

Flat Roll Steel Coating Facilities

 

16 

 

Structural and Rail Division

 

Columbia City, IN

 

Structural and Rail Steel Mill

 

699 

 

Engineered Bar Division

 

Pittsboro, IN

 

Engineered Bar Steel Mill and Finishing Facility

 

310 

 

Vulcan Threaded Products

 

Pelham, AL

 

Bar Steel Processing Facility

 

29 

 

Roanoke Bar Division

 

Roanoke, VA

 

Merchant Bar Steel Mill

 

290 

 

Steel of West Virginia

 

Huntington, WV

 

Specialty Shapes Steel Mill and Finishing Facility

 

49 

 

    Steel of West Virginia

 

Wurtland, KY

 

 

 

28 

 

    Steel of West Virginia

 

Memphis, TN

 

 

 

 

Metals Recycling Operations Segment

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

   OmniSource:

 

 

 

 

 

 

Indiana

 

Multiple Cities

 

Ferrous and Nonferrous Scrap Processing

 

459 

 

28 

Michigan

 

Multiple Cities

 

Ferrous and Nonferrous Scrap Processing

 

189 

 

North Carolina

 

Multiple Cities

 

Ferrous and Nonferrous Scrap Processing

 

346 

 

Ohio

 

Multiple Cities

 

Ferrous and Nonferrous Scrap Processing

 

212 

 

21 

Oklahoma

 

Sand Springs, OK

 

Ferrous Scrap Processing

 

 

Tennessee

 

Johnson City, TN

 

Ferrous and Nonferrous Scrap Processing

 

33 

 

Virginia

 

Multiple Cities

 

Ferrous and Nonferrous Scrap Processing

 

196 

 

Steel Fabrication Operations Segment

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

New Millennium Building Systems:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Joist and Deck Operations

 

Butler, IN

 

Steel Joist and Deck Fabrication Facility

 

95 

 

Joist Operations

 

Fallon, NV

 

Steel Joist Fabrication Facility

 

53 

 

Joist and Deck Operations

 

Hope, AR

 

Steel Joist and Deck Fabrication Facility

 

73 

 

Joist Operations

 

Juarez, MX

 

Steel Joist Fabrication Facility

 

17 

 

Joist and Deck Operations

 

Lake City, FL

 

Steel Joist and Deck Fabrication Facility

 

75 

 

Deck Operations

 

Memphis, TN

 

Deck Fabrication Facility

 

19 

 

Joist and Deck Operations

 

Salem, VA

 

Steel Joist and Deck Fabrication Facility

 

63 

 

Other Operations

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Corporate Headquarters

 

Fort Wayne, IN

 

Office Building (116,000 square feet)

 

20 

 

SDI LaFarga, LLC

 

New Haven, IN

 

Copper Wire Rod Facility

 

35 

 

Mesabi Nugget 

 

Hoyt Lakes, MN

 

Ironmaking Facility – Idled May 2015

 

**

 

**

Mesabi Mining

 

Hoyt Lakes, MN

 

Iron Ore Concentration and Grinding (Mining

 

**

 

**



 

 

 

not developed) – Idled May 2015

 

 

 

 

Mining Resources

 

Chisholm, MN

 

Iron Ore Tailings Mining – Idled May 2015

 

***

 

***

Operations
 Location Description Site
Acreage
Owned
 Site
Acreage
Leased
 

Steel Operations Segment*

           

Butler Flat Roll Division:

           

Butler Operations

 Butler, IN Flat Roll Steel Mill and Coating Facility  1,082   

Jeffersonville Operations

 Jeffersonville, IN Flat Roll Steel Coating Facility  27  10 

Columbus Flat Roll Division

 Columbus, MS Flat Roll Steel Mill and Coating Facility  277  1,422 

The Techs

 Pittsburgh, PA Flat Roll Steel Coating Facilities  16  2 

Structural and Rail Division

 Columbia City, IN Structural and Rail Steel Mill  699   

Engineered Bar Division

 Pittsboro, IN Engineered Bar Steel Mill and Finishing Facility  285   

Roanoke Bar Division

 Roanoke, VA Merchant Bar Steel Mill  290   

Steel of West Virginia

 Huntington, WV Specialty Shapes Steel Mill and Finishing Facility  49  6 

Steel of West Virginia

 Wurtland, KY    28   

Steel of West Virginia

 Memphis, TN    4   

Iron Dynamics

 Butler, IN Liquid Ironmaking Facility  25   

Metals Recycling Operations Segment

           

OmniSource (representing over 75 locations):

           

Georgia

 Athens, Georgia Ferrous and Nonferrous Scrap Processing  22   

Indiana

 Multiple Cities Ferrous and Nonferrous Scrap Processing  484  28 

Michigan

 Multiple Cities Ferrous and Nonferrous Scrap Processing  223   

North Carolina

 Multiple Cities Ferrous and Nonferrous Scrap Processing  446  7 

Ohio

 Multiple Cities Ferrous and Nonferrous Scrap Processing  212  21 

South Carolina

 Multiple Cities Ferrous and Nonferrous Scrap Processing  157   

Tennessee

 Multiple Cities Ferrous and Nonferrous Scrap Processing  44   

Virginia

 Multiple Cities Ferrous and Nonferrous Scrap Processing  196   

Steel Fabrication Operations Segment

           

New Millennium Building Systems:

           

Joist and Deck Operations

 Butler, IN Steel Joist and Deck Fabrication Facility  95   

Joist and Deck Operations

 Lake City, FL Steel Joist and Deck Fabrication Facility  75   

Joist and Deck Operations

 Salem, VA Steel Joist and Deck Fabrication Facility  62   

Joist and Deck Operations

 Hope, AR Steel Joist and Deck Fabrication Facility  72   

Deck Operations

 Memphis, TN Deck Fabrication Facility  19   

Joist Operations

 Fallon, NV Steel Joist Fabrication Facility  53   

Deck Operations

 Phoenix, AZ Deck Fabrication Facility    3 

Joist Operations

 Juarez, MX Steel Joist Fabrication Facility  17   

Other Operations

           

Corporate Headquarters

 Fort Wayne, IN Office Building (116,000 square feet)  20   

SDI LaFarga, LLC

 New Haven, IN Copper Wire Rod Facility  35   

Mesabi Nugget

 Hoyt Lakes, MN Ironmaking Facility—Idled May 2015             **            **

Mesabi Mining

 Hoyt Lakes, MN Iron Ore Concentration and Grinding (Mining not developed)—Idled May 2015             **            **

Mining Resources

 Chisholm, MN Iron Ore Tailings Mining—Idled May 2015             ***            ***

*

For 2015,2017, our steel mill production utilization was 79%92% of our estimated annual steelmaking capability, as compared to domestic and global raw steel capability utilization of 70% according to AISI (domestic) and World Steel Association data.

capability.

**

The Mesabi Nugget and Mesabi Mining properties are located at the site of an open pit taconite mine on the Mesabi Iron Range near Hoyt Lakes, Minnesota.  The site encompasses 7,981 acres of land owned outright by us (including mineral and surface rights) and land for which we acquired a leasehold interestinterests (including 774 acres of mineral and 624 acres of surface rights).  The properties were purchased from Cleveland Cliffs, Inc. and were formerly operated by LTV Corporation.

***

Mining Resources has leases for iron-bearing materials on 916 acres of iron tailings basins located in Chisholm, Minnesota.


Table of Contents23


ITEM 3. ITEM 3.    LEGAL PROCEEDINGS



We are involved along with two other remaining steel manufacturing company defendants, in a class action antitrust suit in federal court in Chicago, Illinois, originally against eight companies. The Complaint alleges a conspiracy on the part of the original defendants to fix, raise, maintain and stabilize the price at which steel products were sold in the United States during a specified period between 2005 and 2007, by artificially restricting the supply of such steel products. All but one of the Complaints were brought on behalf of a purported class consisting of all direct purchasers of steel products. The other Complaint was brought on behalf of a purported class consisting of all indirect purchasers of steel products within the same time period. In addition, another similar complaint was filed in December 2010 purporting to be on behalf of indirect purchasers of steel products in Tennessee. All Complaints have been consolidated in the Chicago action and seek treble damages and costs, including reasonable attorney fees, pre- and post-judgment interest and injunctive relief. Following an extensive period of discovery and related motions concerning class certification matters, the Court, on September 9, 2015, certified a class, limited, however, to the issue of the alleged conspiracy alone, and denied class certification on the issue of antitrust impact and damages. As a result, some additional discovery is ongoing. We have also filed a motion for summary judgment, as has co-defendant SSAB, and this matter is currently pending.

        Due, however, to the uncertain nature of litigation, we cannot presently determine the ultimate outcome of this litigation. Based on the information available at this time, we have determined that there is not presently a "reasonable possibility" (as that term is defined in ASC 450-20-20), that the outcome of these legal proceedings would have a material impact on our financial condition, results of operations, or liquidity. Although not presently necessary or appropriate to make a dollar estimate of exposure to loss, if any, in connection with the above matter, we may in the future determine that a loss accrual is necessary. Although we may make loss accruals, if and as warranted, any amounts that we may accrue from time to time could vary significantly from the amounts we actually pay, due to inherent uncertainties and the inherent shortcomings of the estimation process, the uncertainties involved in litigation and other factors. Additionally, an adverse result could have a material effect on our financial condition, results of operations and liquidity.

        We are also involved in various routine litigation matters, including administrative proceedings, regulatory proceedings, governmental investigations, environmental matters, and commercial and construction contract disputes, none of which are currently expected to have a material impact on our financial condition, results of operations, or liquidity.liquidity

We may also be involved from time to time in various governmental investigations, regulatory proceedings or judicial actions seeking penalties, injunctive relief, and/or remediation under federal, state and local environmental laws and regulations. The United States EPA has conducted such investigations and proceedings involving us, in some instances along with state environmental regulators, under various environmental laws, including RCRA, CERCLA, the Clean Water Act and the Clean Air Act. Some of these matters have resulted in fines or penalties, for which a total of $420,000 is recorded in our financial statements as of December 31, 2017.

ITEM 4.MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES

        The informationInformation required to be furnished pursuant to Item 4 concerning mine safety disclosure matters, requiredif applicable, by Section 1503(a) of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act and Item 104 of Regulation S-K (17 CFR 229.104), is included in Exhibit 95 to this Annual Report.annual report. There are no mine safety disclosures to report for the year ended December 31, 2017, therefore, no Exhibit 95 is required.


Table of Contents24



PART II

ITEM 5.MARKET FOR REGISTRANT'SREGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES

The information required by Item 5 with respect to securities authorized for issuance under equity compensation plans is set forth in Part III, Item 12 of this Form 10-K. Our common stock trades on The NASDAQ Global Select Stock Market under the symbol STLD.  The reported high and low "intra-day"“intra-day” sales prices of our common stock and our dividend information for the two most recent fiscal years are set forth in the following table (in dollars):

 
 Common Stock Market Price  
 
 
 Dividends
Declared
 
 
 High Low 

2015

          

First Quarter

 $20.94 $16.51 $0.1375 

Second Quarter

  23.17  19.50  0.1375 

Third Quarter

  21.73  16.52  0.1375 

Fourth Quarter

  19.71  16.23  0.1375 

2014

  
 
  
 
  
 
 

First Quarter

 $19.53 $15.80 $0.115 

Second Quarter

  19.07  17.00  0.115 

Third Quarter

  25.51  17.75  0.115 

Fourth Quarter

  23.58  18.83  0.115 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

Common Stock

 

 

 

 



 

Market Price

 

Dividends

 



 

High

 

Low

 

Declared

 



2017

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



First Quarter

$

38.47 

 

$

32.55 

 

$

0.1550 

 



Second Quarter

 

37.52 

 

 

32.15 

 

 

0.1550 

 



Third Quarter

 

38.70 

 

 

32.20 

 

 

0.1550 

 



Fourth Quarter

 

43.89 

 

 

33.57 

 

 

0.1550 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



2016

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



First Quarter

$

22.92 

 

$

15.32 

 

$

0.1400 

 



Second Quarter

 

26.99 

 

 

21.57 

 

 

0.1400 

 



Third Quarter

 

28.01 

 

 

22.79 

 

 

0.1400 

 



Fourth Quarter

 

40.17 

 

 

23.34 

 

 

0.1400 

 



As of February 17, 2016,20, 2018,  we had 243,186,659236,071,369 shares of common stock outstanding and held beneficially by approximately 20,60023,500 stockholders based on our security position listing. Because many of the shares were held by depositories, brokers and other nominees, the number of registered holders (approximately 1,540)1,460) is not representative of the number of beneficial holders.

We declared our first quarterly cash dividend duringin July 2004 and continued quarterly dividends throughout 2015.2017. Our board of directors, along with executive management, approves the payment of dividends on a quarterly basis. The determination to pay cash dividends in the future will be at the discretion of our board of directors, after taking into account various factors, including our financial condition, results of operations, outstanding indebtedness, current and anticipated cash needs and growth plans. In addition, the terms of our senior secured revolving credit agreementfacility and the indentureindentures relating to our senior notes restrict the amount of cash dividends we can pay.

Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

We purchased the following equity securities registered by us pursuant to Section 12 of the Exchange Act during the three months ended December 31, 2017.  




 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



Period

 

Total Number of Shares Purchased

 

Average Price Paid per Share

 

Total Number of Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Program (1)

 

Maximum Dollar Value of Shares That May Yet be Purchased Under the Program (in thousands) (1)

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



Quarter ended December 31, 2017

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



October 1-31

 

 -

 

$

 -

 

 

 -

 

$

187,812 

 



November 1-30

 

211,461 

 

 

37.83 

 

 

211,461 

 

 

179,812 

 



December 1 - 31

 

185,258 

 

 

38.26 

 

 

185,258 

 

 

172,724 

 



 

 

396,719 

 

 

 

 

 

396,719 

 

 

 

 

(1)

On October 18, 2016, we announced that our board of directors had authorized a share repurchase program of up to $450.0 million of our common stock. Our board of directors cancelled the previously authorized program with respect to which no shares had been repurchased for a number of years.

Table of Contents25


Total Return Graph


COMPARISON OF 5 YEAR CUMULATIVE TOTAL RETURN*
Among Steel Dynamics, Inc., the NASDAQ Composite Index, and the S&P Steel Index
26


*
$100 invested on 12/31/10 in stock or index, including reinvestment of dividends.

Fiscal year ending December 31.

Copyright© 2016 S&P, a division of McGraw Hill Financial. All rights reserved.


Table of ContentsITEM

6. ITEM 6.    SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA

The following table sets forth the selected consolidated financial and operating data of Steel Dynamics, Inc. The selected consolidated operating, other financial and balance sheet data, as of and for each of the years in the five-year period ended December 31, 2015,2017, were derived from our audited consolidated financial statements. You should read the following data in conjunction withManagement'sManagement’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations and our consolidated financial statements and notes appearing elsewhere in this Form 10-K.

You should also read the following information in conjunction with the data in the table on the following page:


·

In the fourth quarter of 2017, we recorded a tax benefit related primarily to the impact of the revaluation of the company’s deferred tax assets and liabilities as of December 31, 2017, using the lower federal tax rate enacted in the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017, which increased net income and net income attributable to Steel Dynamics, Inc. by $180.6 million, and basic and diluted earnings per share by $0.75.

·

In the fourth quarter of 2016, we recorded a non-cash asset impairment charge associated with the company’s Minnesota ironmaking operations and certain OmniSource assets, which reduced 2016 operating and pretax income by $132.8 million, net income by $89.5 million, net income attributable to Steel Dynamics, Inc. by $76.4 million, and basic and diluted earnings per share by $0.31.

·

In the fourth quarter of 2015, we recorded a pretax non-cash asset impairment charge related to goodwill, trade name and certain other assets associated with OmniSource, which reduced 2015 operating income by $428.5 million, and net income and net income attributable to Steel Dynamics, Inc. by $268.7 million, and basic and diluted earnings per share by $1.11.

·

In the fourth quarter 2014, we recorded a non-cash asset impairment charge associated with the company’s Minnesota ironmaking operations, which reduced 2014 operating and pretax income by $260.0 million, net income by $179.1 million, net income attributable to Steel Dynamics, Inc. by $132.6 million, and basic and diluted earnings per share by $0.55.

·

On September 16, 2014, we completed the acquisition of Severstal Columbus, LLC (Columbus Flat Roll Division). Columbus Flat Roll Division operations are reflected in our steel operations from the date of acquisition.

·

For purposes of calculating our “operational working capital” for all periods presented, we consider amounts invested in trade receivables and inventories, less current liabilities other than income taxes payable and debt as reported on our consolidated balance sheets.

Table of Contents


Table of Contents

 
 Years Ended December 31, 
 
 2015 2014 2013 2012 2011 
 
 (dollars and shares in thousands, except per share data)
 

Operating data:

                

Net sales

 $7,594,411 $8,755,952 $7,372,924 $7,290,234 $7,997,500 

Gross profit

  731,718  966,211  719,144  719,898  931,518 

Operating income (loss)

  (72,784) 320,320  386,525  391,165  584,820 

Asset impairment charges reflected in operating income (loss)

  (428,500) (260,000) (308) (8,250)  

Net income (loss)

  (145,170) 91,650  163,516  142,281  265,692 

Net income (loss) attributable to Steel Dynamics, Inc. 

  (130,311) 157,024  189,314  163,551  278,120 

Basic earnings (loss) per share

 $(.54)$0.68 $0.86 $0.75 $1.27 

Weighted average common shares outstanding

  242,017  232,547  220,916  219,159  218,471 

Diluted earnings (loss) per share

 
$

(0.54

)

$

0.67
 
$

0.83
 
$

0.73
 
$

1.22
 

Weighted average common shares and share equivalents outstanding

  242,017  242,078  238,996  236,624  235,992 

Dividends declared per share

 $0.55 $0.46 $0.44 $0.40 $0.40 

Other financial data:

                

Capital expenditures

 $114,501 $111,785 $186,843 $223,525 $167,007 

Ratio of earnings (losses) to fixed charges

  Note—prior page  2.21x  3.00x  2.31x  3.40x 

Ratio of earnings, excluding asset impairment charges, to fixed charges

  2.20x  4.07x  3.01x  2.36x  3.40x 

Other data:

  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
 

Shipments:

                

Steel operations segment (net tons)

  8,328,150  7,358,366  6,119,884  5,832,776  5,842,694 

Metals recycling operations segment

  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
 

Ferrous metals (gross tons)

  5,139,506  5,566,238  5,505,995  5,647,058  5,879,729 

Nonferrous metals (thousands of pounds)               

  1,082,777  1,173,771  1,052,494  1,051,333  1,066,648 

Steel fabrication operations segment (net tons)

  
492,890
  
480,509
  
366,676
  
295,161
  
217,838
 

Steel operations segment production (net tons)

  
8,528,885
  
7,376,657
  
6,266,507
  
5,884,775
  
5,931,833
 

Shares outstanding (in thousands)

  
243,090
  
241,449
  
222,867
  
219,523
  
218,874
 

Number of employees

  7,510  7,780  6,870  6,670  6,530 

Balance sheet data:

  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
 

Cash and equivalents, and short-term commercial paper

 $727,032 $361,363 $395,156 $407,437 $475,591 

Operational working capital

  1,246,408  1,723,208  1,405,736  1,281,765  1,276,916 

Net property, plant and equipment

  2,951,210  3,123,906  2,226,134  2,231,198  2,193,745 

Total assets

  6,202,082  7,233,159  5,888,534  5,763,561  5,929,604 

Long-term debt (including current maturities)

  2,594,656  2,981,849  2,081,110  2,173,832  2,355,819 

Equity

  2,545,111  2,795,527  2,495,855  2,377,842  2,299,900 

Table of Contents27




 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



Years Ended December 31,



2017

 

2016

 

2015

 

2014

 

2013



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



(dollars and shares in thousands, except per share data)

Operating data:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net sales

$

9,538,797 

 

$

7,777,109 

 

$

7,594,411 

 

$

8,755,952 

 

$

7,372,924 

Gross profit

 

1,582,014 

 

 

1,334,864 

 

 

731,718 

 

 

966,211 

 

 

719,144 

Operating income (loss)

 

1,066,881 

 

 

727,966 

 

 

(72,784)

 

 

320,320 

 

 

386,525 

Asset impairment charges reflected in operating income (loss)

 

 -

 

 

(132,839)

 

 

(428,500)

 

 

(260,000)

 

 

(308)

Net income (loss)

 

805,796 

 

 

360,006 

 

 

(145,170)

 

 

91,650 

 

 

163,516 

Net income (loss) attributable to Steel Dynamics, Inc.

 

812,741 

 

 

382,115 

 

 

(130,311)

 

 

157,024 

 

 

189,314 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Basic earnings (loss) per share

$

3.38 

 

$

1.57 

 

$

(0.54)

 

$

0.68 

 

$

0.86 

Weighted average common shares outstanding

 

240,132 

 

 

243,576 

 

 

242,017 

 

 

232,547 

 

 

220,916 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Diluted earnings (loss) per share

$

3.36 

 

$

1.56 

 

$

(0.54)

 

$

0.67 

 

$

0.83 

Weighted average common shares and share

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    equivalents outstanding

 

241,781 

 

 

245,298 

 

 

242,017 

 

 

242,078 

 

 

238,996 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Dividends declared per share

$

0.62 

 

$

0.56 

 

$

0.55 

 

$

0.46 

 

$

0.44 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Capital expenditures

$

164,935 

 

$

198,160 

 

$

114,501 

 

$

111,785 

 

$

186,843 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Other data:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Shipments:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Steel operations segment (net tons)

 

9,726,977 

 

 

9,245,946 

 

 

8,328,150 

 

 

7,358,366 

 

 

6,119,884 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Metals recycling operations segment

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Ferrous metals (gross tons)

 

4,952,973 

 

 

5,070,380 

 

 

5,139,506 

 

 

5,566,238 

 

 

5,505,995 

Nonferrous metals (thousands of pounds)

 

1,086,799 

 

 

1,103,505 

 

 

1,082,777 

 

 

1,173,771 

 

 

1,052,494 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Steel fabrication operations segment (net tons) 

 

627,274 

 

 

562,725 

 

 

492,875 

 

 

480,509 

 

 

366,676 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Steel operations segment production (net tons)

 

9,995,082 

 

 

9,503,465 

 

 

8,528,885 

 

 

7,376,657 

 

 

6,266,507 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Shares outstanding (in thousands)

 

237,397 

 

 

243,785 

 

 

243,090 

 

 

241,449 

 

 

222,867 

Number of employees

 

7,635 

 

 

7,695 

 

 

7,510 

 

 

7,780 

 

 

6,870 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Balance sheet data:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash and equivalents

$

1,028,649 

 

$

841,483 

 

$

727,032 

 

$

361,363 

 

$

395,156 

Operational working capital

 

1,552,156 

 

 

1,301,405 

 

 

1,246,408 

 

 

1,723,208 

 

 

1,405,736 

Property, plant and equipment, net

 

2,675,904 

 

 

2,787,215 

 

 

2,951,210 

 

 

3,123,906 

 

 

2,226,134 

Total assets

 

6,855,732 

 

 

6,423,732 

 

 

6,202,082 

 

 

7,233,159 

 

 

5,888,534 

Long-term debt (including current maturities)

 

2,381,940 

 

 

2,356,826 

 

 

2,594,656 

 

 

2,981,849 

 

 

2,081,110 

Equity

 

3,195,068 

 

 

2,777,459 

 

 

2,545,111 

 

 

2,795,527 

 

 

2,495,855 

28


ITEM ITEM 7.       MANAGEMENT'SMANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Forward-LookingForward‑Looking Statements

This report contains some predictive statements about future events, including statements related to conditions in the steel and metallic scrap markets, ourSteel Dynamics’ revenues, costs of purchased materials, future profitability and earnings, and the operation of new or existing facilities. These statements, which we generally precede or accompany by such typical conditional words as "anticipate," "intend," "believe," "estimate," "plan," seek,"seek," "project"' or "expect," or by the words "may," "will," or "should," are intended to be made as "forward-looking,"“forward-looking,” subject to many risks and uncertainties, within the safe harbor protections of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, incorporated in Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Such forward-looking statements involve both known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause our actual results, performance or achievements to be materially different from any future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements.1995. These statements speak only as of this date and are based upon information and assumptions, which we consider reasonable as of this date, concerning our businesses and the environments in which they operate. Such predictive statements are not guarantees of future performance, and we undertake no duty to update or revise any such statements. Some factors that could cause such forward-looking statements to turn out differently than anticipated include: (1) the effects of uncertain economic conditions; (2) cyclical and changing industrial demand; (3) changes in conditions in any of the steel or scrap-consuming sectors of the economy which affect demand for our products, including the strength of the non-residential and residential construction, automotive, manufacturing, appliance, pipe and tube, and other steel-consuming industries; (4) fluctuations in the cost of key raw materials and supplies (including steel scrap, iron units, and energy costs) and our ability to pass-onpass on any cost increases; (5) the impact of domestic and foreign import price competition; (6) unanticipated difficulties in integrating or starting up new or acquired businesses; (7) risks and uncertainties involving product and/or technology development; and (8) occurrences of unexpected plant outages or equipment failures.

More specifically, we refer you to the sections titledSpecial Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements at the beginning of Part I of this Report andRisk Factors set forth in Item 1A of this Report, as well as in other subsequent reports we file with the Securities and Exchange Commission, for a more detailed discussionexplanation of some of the manythese and other factors variableand risks and uncertainties and subsequent developments that couldmay cause actual resultssuch predictive statements to differ materially from those we may haveturn out differently than expected or anticipated. These reports are available publicly on the Securities and Exchange Commission website,www.sec.gov, and on our website,www.steeldynamics.com under “Investors – SEC Filings”.

Operating Statement Classifications

Net Sales.SalesNet sales from our operations are a factor of volumes shipped, product mix and related pricing. We charge premium prices for certain grades of steel, product dimensions, certain smaller volumes, and for value-added processing or coating of theour steel products.  Except for ourthe steel fabrication operations, we recognize revenuerevenues from sales and the allowance for estimated costs associated with returns and claims from these sales at the time the title of the product is transferred to the customer.transfers, upon shipment. Provision is made for estimated product returns and customer claims based on estimates and actual historical experience. Net sales fromIf the historical data used in the estimates does not reflect future returns and claims trends, additional provision may be necessary. Our steel fabrication operations are recognized from construction contractsrecognizes revenues utilizing a percentage of completion methodology based on steel tons used on completed units to date as a percentage of estimated total steel tons required for each contract.contract.  

Costs of Goods Sold.SoldOur costs of goods sold represent all direct and indirect costs associated with the manufacture of our products. The principal elements of these costs are scrap and scrap substitutes (which represent the most significant single component of our consolidated costs of goods sold), steel,


Table of Contents

direct and indirect labor and related benefits, alloys, zinc, transportation and freight, repairs and maintenance, utilities (most notablysuch as electricity and natural gas),gas, and depreciation.depreciation.

Selling, General and Administrative Expenses.Expenses.  Selling, general and administrative expenses consist of all costs associated with our sales, finance and accounting, and administrative departments. These costs include, among other items, labor and related benefits, professional services, insurance premiums, and property taxes, company-widetaxes. Company-wide profit sharing and amortization of intangible and other assets.assets are each separately presented in the statement of operations.

Interest Expense, net of Capitalized Interest.Interest.  Interest expense consists of interest associated with our senior credit facilities and other debt net of interest costs that are required to be capitalized during the construction period of certain capital investment projects.

Other (Income) Expense net.(Income), netOther income consists of interest income earned on our temporary cash deposits and investments; any other non-operating income activity, including income from non-consolidated investments accounted for under the equity method. Other expense consists of any non-operating costs, such as certain acquisition and certain financing expenses.expenses.

201529


2017 Overview

        We are���

Our consolidated results for 2017 benefited from improved demand in the domestic steel market, resulting in record steel shipments and sales compared to 2016, improved metal spreads from increased selling prices, and a resulting 19% increase in operating income.  Underlying domestic steel consumption increased in 2017,  as the construction and energy markets continued to improve throughout the year, the heavy and off-road equipment and general industrial manufacturing markets improved, and the automotive markets remained strong.  However, steel imports rose again in 2017, most notably in structural and fabricated structural, but also in cold roll and coated sheet. Supported by increased domestic steel mill utilization compared to 2016, our metals recycling operations were able to maintain consistent volume and realize increased ferrous metal spreads, while also further reducing operating costs, resulting in improved operating income of almost 250%.  The non-residential construction market continued to strengthen, resulting in record steel fabrication sales and shipments, however increasing selling prices were outpaced by higher steel input costs, resulting in compressed metal spread.

Our 2017 performance, both operationally and financially was one of Steel Dynamics, Inc. best years. We achieved numerous annual records, while continuing to focus on and improve company-wide safety.

Summary of significant achievements within our annual 2017 results:

·

Record steel operations shipments of 9.7 million tons

·

Record steel fabrication operations shipments of over 627,000 tons

·

Record consolidated net sales of $9.5 billion

·

Record consolidated operating income of $1.1 billion, and pretax income of $935 million

Consolidated operating income for 2017 increased $206.1 million, or 24%, to $1.1 billion, compared to $860.8 million in 2016, which excludes $132.8 million of non-cash asset impairment charge. Net income attributable to Steel Dynamics, Inc. for 2017 increased $354.1 million, or 77%, to $812.7 million, compared to 2016. Diluted earnings per share attributable to Steel Dynamics, Inc. for 2017 was $3.36, compared to $1.56 for 2016. Included in net income for 2017 was a one-time tax benefit of $180.6 million, or $0.75 per diluted share, resulting from our revaluation of our deferred tax assets and liabilities in connection with the largestU.S. Federal Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017, and net income for 2016 was reduced by $76.4 million, or $0.31 per diluted share, of non-cash asset impairment charge.

2016 Overview

Our consolidated results for 2016 benefited from positive momentum in the sheet steel producerssupply environment during the year, driving improved sheet steel volume and one ofmetal spreads, as well as increased metal spread and operating cost reductions in our metals recycling operations. Underlying domestic steel consumption remained relatively consistent, as the largest metals recyclers inautomotive markets were strong and construction improved throughout the year, while heavy equipment, agriculture and energy markets remained weak. Sheet steel import levels declined during 2016 as compared to 2015, amidst the duties that were levied during 2016 pursuant to the trade cases filed with the United States based on a current estimated annual steelmakingInternational Trade Commission, and coating capability of approximately 11 million tons, and actual recycling volumes. The primary sources ofcustomer inventory levels remained low compared to historical averages. Domestic steel mill utilization rates were flat in 2016 compared to 2015, resulting in lower ferrous volumes in our revenues and operating income are from the manufacture and sale of steel products, processing and sale of recycled ferrous and nonferrous metals, and the fabrication and sale of steel joist and deck products. In the third quarter 2015, we changed our reportable segments consistent with how we currently manage the business, representing three reporting segments: steel operations, metals recycling operations, our metal spreads improved, particularly in nonferrous materials, and we benefited from continued operational cost containment efforts. The non-residential construction market for our steel fabrication operations.

        Our 2015 consolidated operational and financial results were negatively impacted by decreased steel shipments (excluding Columbus Flat Roll Division for the 2015 and 2014 periods) and average steel product pricing, driven by continuing excessive and historically high levels of steel imports. While scrap costs also decreased significantly throughout 2015, steel metal margins contracted as the drop in steel selling prices was more severe than the decline of scrap costs. Underlying domestic steel consumption remained steady, as we continue to see improvements in non-residential construction, as well as steady consumption in automotive and other manufacturing segments. However, a larger portion


Table of Contents

of the domestic steel demand was served by imports in 2015 than compared to 2014. As a result of this, as well as customer destocking, domestic steel mill utilization rates decreased throughout 2015, as compared to 2014, resulting in decreased ferrous scrap shipments in our metals recycling operations. Decreased shipments, along with metal margin compression due to monthly price declines, resulted in significantly reduced profitability in our metals recycling operations in 2015, as compared to 2014. During 2015, our steel fabrication operations continued to benefit from the sustained improvements in non-residential construction demand, our market share and expanding geographic footprint, and lower steel raw material costs, resulting in significant increases in both sales and operating income, compared to 2014.

        Excluding the impact of the $428.5 million and $260.0 million in pretax non-cash impairment charges in 2015 and 2014, respectively, consolidated operating income decreased $224.6increased $505.1 million, or 39%142%, to $860.8 million in 2016, compared to $355.7 million in 2015, compared to $580.3 million in 2014, and net income decreased $151.3attributable to Steel Dynamics, Inc. increased $320.3 million, or 52%232%, to $458.6 million, or $1.87 per diluted share, during 2016, compared with net income of $138.3 million, or $0.57 per diluted share, during 2015, compared with2015. The impact of the $132.8 million pretax non-cash asset impairment charges, including amounts attributable to noncontrolling interests of $13.1 million, reduced 2016 net income of $289.6attributable to Steel Dynamics, Inc. by $76.4 million or $1.22and our diluted earnings per diluted share during 2014.by $0.31. The impact of the $428.5 million pretax non-cash asset impairment charge related to our metals recycling operations reduced 2015 net income attributable to Steel Dynamics, Inc. by $268.7 million and our diluted earnings per share by $1.11. The impact of the $260.0 million pretax non-cash impairment charge related to our Minnesota ironmaking operations, including amounts attributable to noncontrolling interests of $46.5 million, reduced 2014 net income attributable to Steel Dynamics, Inc. by $132.6 million and our diluted earnings per share by $0.55.

2014 Overview


Table of Contents


 Net sales in 2014 of $8.8 billion increased 19% from 2013 net sales of $7.4 billion, due to increased shipments in all of our operating segments, and higher average selling prices in our steel and steel fabrication operations. We achieved record volumes in our steel and steel fabrication operations, which reported increased shipments of 19% (4% without Columbus Flat Roll Division) and 31%, respectively, in 2014, as compared to 2013. Demand continued to be strong in the automotive and manufacturing markets, the non-residential construction markets continued to improve, and we began to realize sales from our new special-bar-quality smaller-diameter rolling mill at our Engineered Bar Products Division and from our premium rail expansion at our Structural and Rail Division. Our metal spreads in steel and steel fabrication operations also improved, as market pricing increased to a greater degree than raw materials costs. Plant utilization was also strong, which resulted in volume-related cost compression in our steel and steel fabrication operations. While shipments increased at our metals recycling operations, operating income decreased in 2014, when compared to 2013, due to decreases in metal spreads. The impact of losses from our Minnesota ironmaking operations on 2014 net income, reflected in "Other", including the impact of the $260.0 million of pretax non-cash asset impairment charges, was approximately $165.9 million, or $0.69 per diluted share, as compared to approximately $42 million, or $0.18 per diluted share in 2013. As a result of the above, net income in 2014, including the impact of impairment charges, decreased $32.3 million or 17%, to $157.0 million, or $0.67 per diluted share.

 Excluding the impact of the $260.0 million in pretax non-cash asset impairment charges, consolidated operating income increased $193.8 million, or 50%, to $580.3 million in 2014, compared to $386.5 million in 2013, and net income increased $100.3 million, or 53%, to $289.6 million, or $1.22 per diluted share, during 2014, compared with net income of $189.3 million, or $0.83 per diluted share, during 2013. The impact of the $260.0 million pretax non-cash asset impairment charge related to our Minnesota ironmaking operations, including amounts attributable to noncontrolling interests of $46.5 million, reduced net income attributable to Steel Dynamics, Inc. by $132.6 million and our diluted earnings per share by $0.55.


Table of Contents

Segment Operating Results (dollars in thousands)



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



Years Ended December 31,



2017

 

% Change

 

2016

 

% Change

 

2015



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net sales

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Steel Operations

$

7,175,409 

 

22%

 

$

5,870,924 

 

8%

 

$

5,422,475 

Metals Recycling Operations

 

2,813,004 

 

30%

 

 

2,171,877 

 

(7)%

 

 

2,337,716 

Steel Fabrication Operations

 

824,425 

 

17%

 

 

703,522 

 

4%

 

 

673,399 

Other

 

375,511 

 

36%

 

 

276,912 

 

(12)%

 

 

314,847 



 

11,188,349 

 

 

 

 

9,023,235 

 

 

 

 

8,748,437 

Intra-company

 

(1,649,552)

 

 

 

 

(1,246,126)

 

 

 

 

(1,154,026)



$

9,538,797 

 

23%

 

$

7,777,109 

 

2%

 

$

7,594,411 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Operating income (loss)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Steel Operations

$

1,098,630 

 

19%

 

$

926,954 

 

130%

 

$

403,216 

Metals Recycling Operations (1)

 

71,052 

 

248%

 

 

20,423 

 

105%

 

 

(448,137)

   Asset Impairment Charges Reflected in

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

   Metals Recycling (1)

 

 -

 

 

 

 

(5,500)

 

 

 

 

(428,500)

Steel Fabrication Operations

 

87,295 

 

(4)%

 

 

90,955 

 

(22)%

 

 

115,947 

Other (2)

 

(190,785)

 

37%

 

 

(301,116)

 

(102)%

 

 

(148,784)

   Asset Impairment Charges Reflected in

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

   Other (2)

 

 -

 

 

 

 

(127,339)

 

 

 

 

 -



 

1,066,192 

 

 

 

 

737,216 

 

 

 

 

(77,758)

Intra-company

 

689 

 

 

 

 

(9,250)

 

 

 

 

4,974 



$

1,066,881 

 

47%

 

$

727,966 

 

1100%

 

$

(72,784)

(1)

Metals recycling operations segment 2016 operating income of $20.4 million includes $5.5 million of pretax non-cash goodwill impairment charge, and 2015 operating loss of $448.1 million in 2015 includes $428.5 million of pretax non-cash goodwill and other related asset impairment charge.

(2)

Other operations consists of subsidiary operations that are below the quantitative thresholds required for reportable segments and primarily consist of our Minnesota ironmaking operations that have been idle since May 2015, and other smaller joint ventures. Also included in “Other” are certain unallocated corporate accounts, such as the company’s senior secured credit facility, senior notes, certain other investments and certain profit sharing expenses. Other operations operating loss of $301.1 million in 2016 includes $127.3 million of pretax non-cash asset impairment charges related to our Minnesota ironmaking operations.

Steel Operations Segment

Steel Operations Segment.  Steel operations consist of our electric arc furnace steel mills, producing sheet and long products steel from ferrous scrap and scrap substitutes, utilizing continuous casting, automated rolling mills with several downstream coating and bar processing lines, as well as IDI, our liquid pig iron production facility that supplies solely the Butler Flat Roll Division. Our steel operations sell directly to end-users, steel fabricators, and service centers. These products are used in numerous industry sectors, including the construction, automotive, manufacturing, transportation, heavy equipment and agriculture, and pipe and tube (including OCTG) markets (see Item 1 to this Form 10-K). Steel operations accounted for 72% of our consolidated net sales during 2017 and 2016, and 69% in 2015.

 
 Years Ended December 31, 
 
 2015 %
Change
 2014 %
Change
 2013 

Net sales

              

Steel Operations Segment

 $5,422,475 (7)% $5,821,578 24% $4,684,847 

Metals Recycling Operations Segment

  2,337,716 (34)%  3,539,206 8%  3,274,866 

Steel Fabrication Operations Segment

  673,399 7%  631,808 44%  439,655 

Other

  314,847 (33)%  468,505 57%  299,079 

Total

  8,748,437    10,461,097    8,698,447 

Intra-company

  (1,154,026)   (1,705,145)   (1,325,523)

Consolidated

 $7,594,411 (13)% $8,755,952 19% $7,372,924 

Operating income (loss)

              

Steel Operations Segment

 $403,216 (41)% $683,609 32% $516,125 

Metals Recycling Operations Segment(1)

  (448,137)(1,823)%  26,014 (38)%  41,949 

Steel Fabrication Operations Segment

  115,947 123%  51,894 641%  7,003 

Other(2)

  (148,784)67%  (445,549)(150)%  (177,939)

Total

  (77,758)   315,968    387,138 

Intra-company

  4,974    4,352    (613)

Consolidated

 $(72,784)(123)% $320,320 (17)% $386,525 

31


Steel Operations Segment Shipments (tons):

(1)



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



Years Ended December 31,

 



2017

 

% Change

 

2016

 

% Change

 

2015

 

Total shipments

9,726,977 

 

5%

 

9,245,946 

 

11%

 

8,328,150 

 

Intra-segment shipments

(378,081)

 

 

 

(282,610)

 

 

 

(222,025)

 

Steel Operations Segment shipments

9,348,896 

 

4%

 

8,963,336 

 

11%

 

8,106,125 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

External shipments

9,015,013 

 

5%

 

8,558,331 

 

11%

 

7,703,749 

 

Segment Results 2017 vs. 2016

Underlying domestic steel consumption increased in 2017,  as the construction and energy markets continued to improve throughout the year, the heavy and off-road equipment and general industrial manufacturing markets improved, and the automotive markets remained strong, as we continued to gain market share in this market, particularly at our Columbus Flat Roll Division.  With domestic steel consumption increasing in 2017 over 2016, steel imports, particularly for long products but also cold roll and coated sheet, rose over 15% from 2016 levels, representing 27% of 2017 domestic consumption. In spite of increased imports, our steel mills utilization rate increased to 92% in 2017, as compared to 87% in 2016, with increases in both our sheet and long products steel utilization rates. Our steel utilization rates continue to outpace our domestic competitors, which averaged 74% during 2017, due to our diversified value-added product offerings. Net sales for the steel operations increased 22% in 2017, when compared to 2016, due to a 4% increase in steel operations shipments combined with an increase of $110 per ton, or 17%, in average selling prices. Sheet steel average selling prices increased 19% in 2017 compared to 2016, while long products rose 10%.

Metallic raw materials used in our electric arc furnaces represent our single most significant steel manufacturing cost, generally comprising approximately 60% of our steel operations’ manufacturing costs, excluding the operations of The Techs and Vulcan, which purchase, rather than produce, the steel they further process. Our metallic raw material cost per net ton consumed in our steel operations increased $73, or 33%, compared to the same period in 2016, consistent with overall ferrous scrap market pricing.

32


Operating income for the steel operations increased 19%, to a record $1.1 billion, in 2017, compared to 2016, due to an 8% increase in metal spread (which we define as the difference between average selling prices and the cost of ferrous scrap consumed) on higher selling prices, coupled with increased steel shipments.

Segment Results 2016 vs. 2015

Overall steel operations performance in 2016 compared to 2015 benefited from positive momentum throughout the year in the sheet steel supply environment, as the excessively high levels of steel imports experienced in 2015 and 2014 declined approximately 15% in 2016 on a year-over-year basis. Duties levied in 2016 pursuant to the trade case rulings from the United States International Trade Commission, coupled with low customer inventories compared to historical levels, precipitated higher domestic steel shipments and higher utilization for our steel mills. Our steel mills utilization rate improved to 87% for 2016, as compared to 79% in 2015, with our sheet steel utilization rate improving to 99% in 2016 from 86% in 2015. The domestic steel demand outlook remained relatively unchanged throughout 2016, as automotive markets were strong and construction improved throughout the year, while heavy equipment, agriculture and energy markets remained challenged. Overall steel selling prices improved during the last three quarters of 2016 from the significant decline that occurred throughout 2015 and early 2016 as sheet steel imports declined. Net sales for the steel operations increased 8% in 2016, when compared to 2015, as an 11% increase in steel operations shipments more than offset a decrease of $15 per ton, or 2%, in average selling prices.

Our metallic raw material cost per net ton consumed in our steel operations decreased $35, or 14%, in 2016 compared to 2015, consistent with overall ferrous scrap market pricing.

Operating income for the steel operations increased 130%, to $927.0 million, in 2016, compared to 2015, due to an 11% increase in steel shipments coupled with a 5% increase in overall steel operations metal spread expansion. Sheet steel metal spread expanded 15%, while long products metal spread contracted 9%, as domestic overcapacity and an aggressive competitive environment continued.

Metals Recycling Operations Segment

Metals Recycling Operations Segment.  Metals recycling operations segmentconsists solely of OmniSource and includes both ferrous and nonferrous scrap metal processing, transportation, marketing, and brokerage services, strategically located primarily in close proximity to our steel mills and other end-user scrap consumers throughout the eastern half of the United States.  OmniSource designs, installs, and manages customized programs for industrial manufacturing companies at hundreds of locations throughout North America. Our steel mills utilize a large portion (between 54% and 63% for the periods presented) of the ferrous scrap sold by OmniSource as raw material in our steelmaking operations, and the remainder is sold to other consumers, such as other steel manufacturers and foundries. Metals recycling operations accounted for 15% of our consolidated net sales during 2017 and 2016 and 19% in 2015.

Metals Recycling Operations Segment Shipments:



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

Years Ended December 31,

 



 

2017

 

% Change

 

2016

 

% Change

 

2015

 

Ferrous metal (gross tons)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total

 

4,952,973 

 

(2)%

 

5,070,380 

 

(1)%

 

5,139,506 

 

Inter-company

 

(3,108,858)

 

 

 

(3,112,616)

 

 

 

(2,755,218)

 

External shipments

 

1,844,115 

 

(6)%

 

1,957,764 

 

(18)%

 

2,384,288 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Nonferrous metals (thousands of pounds)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total

 

1,086,799 

 

(2)%

 

1,103,505 

 

2%

 

1,082,777 

 

Inter-company

 

(140,678)

 

 

 

(111,947)

 

 

 

(85,410)

 

External shipments

 

946,121 

 

(5)%

 

991,558 

 

(1)%

 

997,367 

 

Segment Results 2017 vs. 2016

Metals recycling operations operating lossincome in 2017 of $448.1$71.1 million increased  $45.1 million, or almost 250%, compared to 2016  (excluding the impact in 2016 of a  $5.5 million impairment charge). Net sales increased 30% in 2017 as compared to 2016, driven by increased ferrous and nonferrous pricing, which improved 39% and 29%, respectively, compared to 2016. We were able to maintain shipments close to 2016 levels despite the sale of some non-core locations in early 2017, as overall domestic steel mill utilization was 74% in 2017, compared to 70% in 2016. Metals recycling operations ferrous shipments to our steel mills increased to 63% of total tons shipped in 2017,  compared to 61% in 2016. Ferrous metal spread (which we define as the difference between average selling prices and the cost of purchased scrap) improved 17% as selling prices increased throughout 2017, and we were able to achieve further reduced operating expenses.

33


Segment Results 2016 vs. 2015

Metals recycling operations operating income in 2016 of $25.9 million (excluding the impact of a $5.5 million asset impairment charge) was $45.6 million higher than 2015 (excluding the impact in 2015 includesof $428.5 million of pretax non-cash goodwillimpairment charges), due to our continued focus on reduction of operating costs, along with improved ferrous and other related asset impairment charges.

(2)
nonferrous metal spreads. Net sales decreased 7% in 2016 compared to 2015, with ferrous and nonferrous selling prices decreasing 5% and 9%, respectively. While total ferrous and nonferrous shipments were comparable during 2016 and 2015, metal spreads increased 11% and 10%, respectively, as scrap costs declined more than selling prices, driving improved operating income during 2016.  With improved utilization at our steel mills in 2016, the metals recycling operations ferrous shipments to our mills increased to 61% of total tons shipped in 2016, compared to 54% in 2015. 

Steel Fabrication Operations Segment

Steel Fabrication Operations Segment.  Steel fabrication operations include our New Millennium Building Systems’ joist and deck plants located throughout the United States and in Northern Mexico. Revenues from these plants are generated from the fabrication of steel joists, trusses, girders and steel deck used within the non-residential construction industry. Steel fabrication operations accounted for 9% of our consolidated net sales during 2017, 2016 and 2015.

Segment Results 2017 vs. 2016

The overall non-residential construction market continued to improve throughout 2017, demonstrating a positive growth profile, as our fabrication operations achieved record shipments in 2017. Net sales of $824.4 million for the segment increased $120.9 million, or 17%, in 2017, compared to 2016, as volumes increased 11% and selling prices increased 5%. Our steel fabrication operations continued to realize strength in order activity and resulting shipments, as we continued to leverage our national operating footprint to sustain and improve market share, and market demand continued to improve.

The purchase of various steel products is the largest single cost of production for our steel fabrication operations, generally representing approximately two-thirds of the total cost of manufacturing. The average cost of steel consumed increased by 15% in 2017, consistent with increased selling prices discussed in the steel operations results, as compared to 2016, while average selling prices increased only 5%, resulting in metal spread (which we define as the difference between average selling prices and the cost of purchased steel) contracting 5%. Operating income decreased 4% to $87.3 million in 2017 compared to 2016, as increased shipments were more than offset by metal spread contraction.

34


Segment Results 2016 vs. 2015

The non-residential construction market was strong during 2016; however, decreased annual selling prices outpaced decreased overall steel input costs, resulting in metal spread compression. As a result of record shipments, which more than offset decreased selling prices, net sales for the steel fabrication operations increased $30.1 million, or 4%, in 2016, compared to 2015. Metal spread declined 10% in 2016, compared to 2015, as a $116 per ton, or 8%, decrease in average selling prices outpaced a 7% decrease in the average cost of steel consumed. This resulted in a 22% decrease in operating income to $91.0 million in 2016, as compared to $115.9 million in 2015.  

Other Operations

Other operations consists of subsidiary operations that are below the quantitative thresholds required for reportable segments and primarily consist of our idled Minnesota ironmaking operations that were indefinitely idled in May 2015, and several smaller joint ventures. Also included in "Other"“Other” are certain unallocated corporate accounts, such as the company'scompany’s senior secured credit facility, senior notes, certain other investments and certain profit sharing expenses. Operating loss of $445.5 million in 2014 includes $260.0 million of pretax non-cash asset impairment charges related to our Minnesota ironmaking operations.

Steel Operations Segment

        Steel Operations Segment.expenses    Steel operations consist of our six electric arc furnace steel mills, producing steel from ferrous scrap and scrap substitutes, utilizing continuous casting, automated rolling mills, and ten downstream coating lines, and IDI, our liquid pig production facility that supplies solely our Butler Flat Roll Division mill. Our steel operations sell directly to end users and service centers (see Item 1 to this Form 10-K). These products are used in numerous industry sectors, including the automotive, construction, manufacturing, transportation, heavy and agriculture equipment, and pipe and tube (including OCTG) markets. During 2015, 2014, and 2013, our steel operations accounted for 69%, 63%, and 61% respectively, of our consolidated net sales.


Table of Contents

Steel Operations Segment Shipments (tons):

 
 Years Ended December 31, 
 
 2015 %
Change
 2014 %
Change
 2013 

Shipments:

              

Butler Flat Roll Division

  2,539,399    2,917,259    2,904,149 

Columbus Flat Roll Division

  2,598,939    873,661     

The Techs

  667,661    714,158    669,608 

Sheet products

  5,805,999 29%  4,505,078 26%  3,573,757 

Structural and Rail Division

  1,185,109    1,324,935    1,178,606 

Engineered Bar Products Division        

  509,083    646,731    488,393 

Roanoke Bar Division

  515,440    572,373    569,260 

Steel of West Virginia

  312,519    309,249    309,868 

Long products

  2,522,151 (12)%  2,853,288 12%  2,546,127 

Total shipments

  8,328,150 13%  7,358,366 20%  6,119,884 

Intra-segment shipments

  (222,025)   (241,656)   (135,938)

Steel operations segment shipments        

  8,106,125 14%  7,116,710 19%  5,983,946 

External shipments

  7,703,749 15%  6,704,714 19%  5,628,632 

Table of Contents


Steel Operations
Shipments and Average Selling Price

Segment Results 2015 vs. 2014

Overall steel operations performance in 2015 compared to 2014 was negatively impacted by continuing excessive and historically high levels of steel imports, customers destocking inventories, and sharply falling steel and scrap prices. Domestic steel consumption was relatively steady during 2015, with strong automotive and improving non-residential steel markets, but a large portion of the domestic consumption was served by imports. Net sales for the steel operations decreased 7% in 2015, when compared to 2014, as a 14% increase in steel operations shipments was more than offset by a decrease of $149 per ton, or 18%, in average selling prices. In spite of solid overall domestic steel demand, average selling prices decreased throughout 2015 due to elevated levels of imported steel into the United States and significant reductions in the cost of scrap, which also caused uncertainty for steel consumers. Steel operations shipments increased 14% in 2015 compared to 2014 with the inclusion of Columbus Flat Roll Division for the full year of 2015 (acquired September 16, 2014), as 2015 sales volumes, excluding them, were down 12% compared to 2014.

        Metallic raw materials used in our electric arc furnaces represent our single most significant steel manufacturing cost. During 2015 and 2014, our metallic raw material costs represented 55% and 65%, respectively, of our steel operations' manufacturing costs, excluding the operations of The Techs, which purchases, rather than produces, the steel it further processes. Our metallic raw material cost per net ton consumed in our steel operations decreased $105, or 29%, in 2015, compared with 2014, consistent with overall declines in scrap market pricing.

        Decreases in steel selling prices more than offset decreases in raw material cost per ton, resulting in 2015 metal spread (which we define as the difference between average selling prices and the cost of ferrous scrap consumed) contracting significantly compared to 2014. Thus, despite increased shipments from the inclusion of Columbus Flat Roll Division for the full year 2015 versus only four and a half months in 2014, operating income for the steel operations decreased 41%, to $403.2 million, compared to 2014.


Table of Contents

Segment Results 2014 vs. 2013

        Net sales for steel operations increased in 2014 by $1.1 billion, or 24%, ($638.3 million, or 13%, of which related to the addition of Columbus Flat Roll Division), compared to 2013, with the segment achieving record shipments of 7.4 million tons in 2014. Selling volumes increased for both our sheet products (26%, of which 24% was related to Columbus Flat Roll Division) and long products (12%) in 2014, compared to 2013, and overall product mix shifted somewhat toward sheet products with the acquisition of Columbus Flat Roll Division. Our Engineered Bar Products and Structural and Rail Divisions achieved increased shipments of 32% and 12%, respectively. Demand for our sheet products remained strong in the automotive and manufacturing markets. Customer demand for our special-bar-quality products strengthened from the prior year, and we began selling smaller diameter products produced from our recent expansion project. Demand for structural steel products improved with the continued growth in the non-residential construction market, and we began to realize sales from our expansion into premium rail. In addition, despite pressure from increased imports in 2014, our average steel selling prices improved by $35 per ton, or 4%, over those in 2013 on the strength of improved domestic market demand in 2014.

        Our metallic raw material cost per net ton consumed in our steel operations increased $7 in 2014 compared with 2013. During 2014 and 2013, our metallic raw material costs represented 65% of our steelmaking operations' manufacturing costs, excluding the operations of The Techs, which purchases, rather than produces, the steel it further processes. As a result of record shipments and metal spread, operating income for the steel operations increased 32%, to $683.6 million in 2014, compared to $516.1 million in 2013.

Metals Recycling Operations Segment

        Metals Recycling Operations Segment.    Metals recycling operations consists solely of OmniSource, our metals recycling, processing, and ferrous scrap procurement operations. OmniSource sells ferrous metals to steel mills and foundries, and nonferrous metals, such as copper, brass, aluminum and stainless steel to, among others, ingot manufacturers, copper refineries and mills, smelters, and specialty mills. Our metals recycling operations accounted for 19%, 25%, and 31% of our consolidated net sales in 2015, 2014, and 2013, respectively.

Metals Recycling Operations Segment Shipments:

 
 Years Ended December 31, 
 
 2015 % Change 2014 % Change 2013 

Ferrous metal (gross tons)

              

Total

  5,139,506 (8)%  5,566,238 1%  5,505,995 

Inter-company

  (2,755,218)   (2,673,777)   (2,422,736)

External shipments

  2,384,288 (18)%  2,892,461 (6)%  3,083,259 

Nonferrous metals (thousands of pounds)

              

Total

  1,082,777 (8)%  1,173,771 12%  1,052,494 

Inter-company

  (85,410)   (89,078)   (18,450)

External shipments

  997,367 (8)%  1,084,693 5%  1,034,044��

Segment Results 2015 vs. 2014

        Overall metals recycling operations performance in 2015 compared to 2014 was negatively impacted by excess domestic scrap competition, a strong U.S. dollar tempering scrap exports, and lower


Table of Contents

domestic steel mill utilizations, resulting in substantial decreases in selling prices. Metals recycling operations net sales decreased 34% in 2015 as compared to 2014, with ferrous and nonferrous volumes both decreasing 8% in 2015, as compared to 2014. Similarly, both ferrous and nonferrous selling prices declined 37% and 18%, respectively, during 2015, as compared to 2014, consistent with overall declines in scrap market selling prices. Metal spreads (which we define as the difference between average selling prices and the cost of purchased scrap) for ferrous and nonferrous materials contracted 14% and 18%, respectively, during 2015 as compared to 2014 as selling prices declined more than scrap costs. Operating loss for the metals recycling operations in 2015 of $448.1 million includes $428.5 million of pretax non-cash asset impairment charges related to goodwill, trade name and other assets. Excluding the impairment charges, metals recycling operations segment operating loss is $19.6 million compared to operating income of $26.0 million in 2014.

Segment Results 2014 vs. 2013

        Net sales for metals recycling operations increased 8% in 2014 as compared to 2013, as nonferrous volumes increased 12% with steady pricing, while ferrous volumes were slightly higher and selling prices increased 2%. Operating income for the metals recycling operations decreased $15.9 million, or 38%, in 2014, when compared to 2013, as the decreases in both ferrous and nonferrous metal spreads of 8% and 2%, respectively, more than offset the impact of the increased nonferrous, and to a lesser degree, ferrous shipments.

Steel Fabrication Operations Segment

        Steel Fabrication Operations Segment.    Steel fabrication operations consist of our eight New Millennium Building Systems plants located throughout the United States and Northern Mexico. Revenues from these plants are generated from the fabrication of trusses, girders, steel joists and steel deck used within the non-residential construction industry. Steel fabrication operations accounted for 9%, 7%, and 6% of our consolidated net sales during 2015, 2014, and 2013, respectively.


Steel Fabrication Operations

Sales Volumes and Average Selling Price


Table of Contents

Segment Results 2015 vs. 2014

        Overall steel fabrication operations performance in 2015 compared to 2014 was positively impacted by a recovering non-residential construction market, increased average selling prices, and lower costs of manufacturing due to lower steel input prices. Net sales for the steel fabrication operations increased $41.6 million, or 7%, in 2015, compared to 2014, as shipments increased 3% and average selling prices increased $51 per ton, or 4%, with increased demand. Our steel fabrication operations continue to realize strength in order activity and resulting shipments and selling prices, as we leverage our national operating footprint and market demand continues to improve.

        The purchase of various steel products is the largest single cost of production for our steel fabrication operations, generally representing more than two-thirds of the total cost of manufacturing. The average cost of steel consumed decreased by 14% in 2015, as compared to 2014, and coupled with 4% higher selling prices resulted in significantly expanded metal spreads. As a result of record shipments, increased selling prices and metal spread expansion, as well as decreased conversion costs realized from manufacturing efficiencies, operating income increased 123% to $115.9 million in 2015, as compared to $51.9 million in 2014.

        On September 14, 2015, we purchased from CSi certain of its steel deck facilities (including associated assets) and net working capital of approximately $30 million, for a purchase price of $45 million in cash. Operating results of these facilities have been reflected in our financial statements since the September 14, 2015, purchase date, in the steel fabrication operations. The purchased assets include two deck facilities located in Memphis, Tennessee, and Phoenix, Arizona. Producing both standard and premium specialty deck profiles, the new locations will allow for enhanced geographic reach into the southwestern and western markets, and further diversify New Millennium Building Systems' product offerings.

        Steel fabrication operations net sales increased $192.2 million, or 44%, in 2014, compared to 2013, as shipments increased 31% and average selling prices increased $116 per ton, or 10%, with increased demand. Our steel fabrication operations experienced strength in order activity and resulting shipments at levels in excess of overall improving consumer demand during 2014, as we continued to leverage our national footprint to expand market share. The average cost of steel consumed increased in 2014, as compared to 2013, by $47 per ton, consistent with increased pricing in the general relevant steel market. Operating income for the steel fabrication operations of $51.9 million in 2014 was over seven times that of 2013, due to record level shipments and metal spread expansion, as well as decreased conversion costs realized from manufacturing efficiencies and from higher production volumes.

Other Operations

        Other operations consists of subsidiary operations that are below the quantitative thresholds required for reportable segments and primarily consist of our Minnesota ironmaking operations, which were indefinitely idled in May 2015, and several smaller joint ventures. Also included in "Other" are certain unallocated corporate accounts, such as the company's senior secured credit facility, senior notes, certain other investments and certain profit sharing expenses. Prior to being indefinitely idled, our Minnesota ironmaking operations experienced operating losses. In addition, upon deciding to idle the Minnesota ironmaking operations and to monetize existing raw material inventory, we recorded an inventory lower-of-cost or market charge of $21.0 million (inclusive of noncontrolling interests of $3.6 million), in cost of goods sold in the second quarter 2015. Operating losses associated with our Minnesota ironmaking operations have been significantly curtailed post-idling. The impact of losses


Table of Contents

from our Minnesota ironmaking operations on 2015 net income attributable to Steel Dynamics, Inc. was approximately $27.9 million, as compared to $165.9 million in 2014.

During the fourth quarter of 2014,2016 impairment indicators related primarily to Mining Resources and Mesabi Mining fixed assets within our Minnesota ironmaking operations reached a steady operating state, indicating a consistency in the operation's production capability, processes and cost structure, including the ability to utilize certain lower-cost raw materials. Given this, we undertook an assessment of the recoverability of the carrying value of our Minnesota ironmaking operation's fixed assets. Given our outlook at that time regarding future operating costs and product pricing, we concluded that the carrying value of these fixed assets was no longer fully recoverable, and the fixed assets were in fact impaired. This assessment resulted in a $260.0 million pretax non-cash asset impairment charge of $127.3 million, including amounts attributable to noncontrolling interests of $46.5$13.1 million, which reduced net income attributable to Steel Dynamics, Inc. by $132.6 million. The impact of losses from our Minnesota ironmaking operations on 2014 net income, including$72.9 million for the impact of the $260.0 million of pretax non-cash impairment charges, was approximately $165.9 million. Excluding the $260.0 million in pretax non-cash impairment charges, the impact of Minnesota ironmaking operations on 2014 net income attributable to Steel Dynamics, Inc. was approximately $33.3 million, as compared to approximately $41.9 million in 2013.year ended December 31, 2016. 

Consolidated Results 20152017 vs. 20142016

Selling, General and Administrative Expenses. Selling, general and administrative expenses (including profit sharing and amortization of intangible assets) of $376.0$394.6 million during 2015 were comparable to $385.92017 increased 6% from $374.0 million during 2014,2016,  representing approximately 4.9%4.1% and 4.4%4.8% of net sales, respectively. The increase in 2017 compared to 2016 is due most notably to increased performance-based incentive compensation, associated with our increased profitability. Profit sharing of $91.3 million in 2017, increased $21.0 million, or 28% over 2016, with our increased profitability.

Interest Expense, net of Capitalized Interest.    During 2015,2017, interest expense increased $17.7decreased $11.6 million or 12%, to $154.0$134.4 million, when compared to 2014.2016.  The increasedecrease in interest expense is due primarily to the addition of the $1.2 billionlower interest rates on our senior notes in September 2014, in conjunction with our acquisitionoutstanding. In the fourth quarter of Columbus Flat Roll Division, partially offset by the conversion or payoff at maturity of $287.52016, we called and repaid $400.0 million of 5.125% convertible6.125% senior notes due 2019 with 5.000% senior notes due 2026. Also in June 2014,the fourth quarter of 2016, we early paid off the remaining $228.1 million of outstanding Senior Term Loan debt. In addition, in the second half of 2017, we called and the call ofrepaid our $350.0 million 75/8% Senior Notesof 6.375% senior notes due 2020 in March 2015.2022 with 4.125% senior notes due 2025.

Other Expense (Income), net.  During 2015, netNet other expenseincome of $15.4$2.8 million in 2017 included $16.7$14.6 million of expense associated with call premium and other financing costs associated with the March 2015 senior notestender and call and prepayment.of the Senior Notes due 2022, which were more than offset by other income, primarily interest. Net other expense of $18.3$17.8 million in 20142016 included $25.2$16.5 million of acquisitionexpense associated with call premium and other financing costs associated with our September 2014 Columbus Flat Roll Division acquisition.the tender and call of the Senior Notes due 2019.

Income Tax Expense (Benefit).  During 2015,2017, our income tax benefitexpense was $96.9$129.4 million at an effective income tax rate of 40.0%13.8%, as compared to income tax expense of $73.2$204.1 million resulting in an effective income tax rate of 44.4%36.2% during 2014.2016. The higherlower effective tax rate in 20142017 was due primarily to the impact of the increased noncontrolling interest losses, offset somewhat by increased benefits from other permanenta one-time $180.6 million net federal tax benefit items, most notablyresulting from our revaluation of deferred tax assets and liabilities in connection with the domestic manufacturing deduction.enacted Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017, and discrete tax benefits related to valuation allowance reductions, state tax refunds and equity-based compensation.

Included in the balance of unrecognized tax benefits of $16.7 million at December 31, 2015, of $16.0 million2017, are potential benefits of $11.7$12.5 million that, if recognized, would affect theour effective tax rate. We recognize interest and penalties related to our tax contingencies on a net-of-tax basis in income tax expense (benefit).expense. During the year ended December 31, 2015,2017, we recognized benefitsexpense from the reductionincrease of interest expense of $100,000,$85,000, net of tax.  In addition to the unrecognized tax benefits noted above, we had $5.2$4.8 million accrued for the payment of interest and penalties at December 31, 2015.2017.

We file income tax returns in the U.S.United States federal jurisdiction as well as income tax returns in various state jurisdictions. TheWe are subject to examination and proposed adjustments by the IRS is currently examining our federal income tax returns for the years 2010 and 2011.thereafter.  At this time, we do not believe there will be any significant examination adjustments that would result in a material change to our financial position, results of operations or cash flows. It is


Table of Contents

reasonably possible that the amount of unrecognized tax benefits could change in the next twelve months as a result of these federal income tax audits, and state income tax audits. Based on the current audits in process, the payment of taxes as a result of audit settlements could be in an amount from zero to $7.1$3.3 million by the end of 2016.2018. With the exception of the 2010 and 2011 federal return, which is currently under examination,returns, we are no longer subject to federal, state and local income tax examinations by tax authorities for years ended before 2011.2012.

Consolidated Results 20142016 vs. 20132015

Selling, General and Administrative Expense.Expenses. Selling, general and administrative expenses (including profit sharing and amortization of intangible assets) were $385.9$374.0 million during 2014, as compared to $332.32016 increased 14% from $328.8 million during 2013, an increase of $53.6 million, or 16%. During 20142015, representing approximately 4.8% and 2013, these selling, general and administrative expenses represented approximately 4.4% and 4.5%4.3% of net sales, respectively. The increase in total SG&A expenses in 20142016 compared to 2013 relates2015 is due most notably to the increased profit sharing,performance-based incentive compensation, and stock compensation expensesassociated with our increased profitability. Profit sharing of $35.5$71.3 million whichin 2016, increased due to$48.2 million over 2015, with our increased profitability before the Minnesota ironmaking operations asset impairment charges. While total intangible assets increased slightly due to the acquisition of Columbus Flat Roll Division, amortization of intangible assets decreased $4.2 million, or 13%, during 2014 compared to 2013 due to the accelerated amortization methods used for intangible assets related to existing customer and scrap generator relationships.profitability.

35


Interest Expense, net of Capitalized Interest.    During 2014, gross2016, interest expense increased $7.4 million, or 6%, to $139.7 million, and capitalized interest decreased $2.1$7.9 million to $2.5$146.0 million, aswhen compared to 2013.2015. The decrease in interest capitalized during these periods relates to growth or expansion projects initiated in 2013 at two of our steel mills that were completed in 2014. The increase in gross interest expense is due primarily to the additioncall and prepayment of our $350.0 million 7 5/8% Senior Notes due 2020, in the $1.2 billion senior notes in September 2014, in conjunction with our acquisitionfirst quarter of Columbus Flat Roll Division, partially offset by the conversion or payoff at maturity2015.

Other Expense (Income), net.  During 2016, net other expense of $287.5$17.8 million included $16.5 million of 5.125% convertible notes in June 2014.

        Other (Income) Expense, net.    Other expense increased $22.3 million to $18.3 million during 2014, as compared toexpenses associated with call premium and other income of $4.0 million during 2013, due primarily to $25.2 million in acquisition and financefinancing costs associated with the acquisitiontender and call of Columbus Flat Roll Division.the Senior Notes due 2019. Net other expense of $15.4 million in 2015 includes $16.7 million of expenses associated with tender and call premium and other financing costs associated with the tender and call of the Senior Notes due 2020.

Income Tax Expense (Benefit).  During 2014,2016, our income tax expense was $73.2$204.1 million as compared to $99.3 million during 2013, and ourat an effective income tax rate before exclusion of noncontrolling interests was 44.4% and 37.8%36.2%, for 2014 and 2013, respectively. The higheras compared to a benefit of $96.9 million resulting in an effective income tax rate of 40.0% during 2015. The lower effective tax rate in 2014 is2016 was due primarily to the impact of the increased noncontrolling interest losses, offset somewhat by increased benefits from other permanent tax benefit items, most notably the 2016 domestic manufacturing deduction. The 2013 effective tax rate benefited from the effects of additional stock option exercises during 2013, and 2012 research and development tax credits enacteddeduction, available in January 2013.years with taxable income.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

        Columbus Flat Roll Division Acquisition.    In September 2014, we issued $700.0 million of 5.125% Senior Notes due 2021 and $500.0 million of 5.500% Senior Notes due 2024 (together, the Senior Notes). The proceeds from the issuance of the Senior Notes, along with cash on hand and $117.8 million in borrowings under our senior secured credit facility were used to fund the September 16, 2014, acquisition of Columbus Flat Roll Division and related expenses.

Capital Resources and Long-termLong‑term Debt.Our business is capital intensive and requires substantial expenditures for, among other things, the purchase and maintenance of equipment used in our steelmakingsteel, metals recycling, and finishingsteel fabrication operations, and to remain in compliance with environmental laws. Our


Table of Contents

short-term and long-term liquidity needs arise primarily from working capital requirements, capital expenditures, principal and interest payments related to our outstanding indebtedness, dividends to our shareholders, and acquisitions. We have met these liquidity requirements primarily with cash provided by operations and long-term borrowings, and we also have availability under our Revolver. We had recordRevolver. Our liquidity at December 31, 2015,2017, is as follows (in thousands):

Cash and equivalents

 $727,032 

Revolver availability

  1,187,170 

Total liquidity

 $1,914,202 

Cash and equivalents

$

1,028,649 

Revolver availability

1,188,082 

Total liquidity

$

2,216,731 

Our total outstanding debt decreased $387.2increased $22.1 million during 2015,2017, due to $2.6 billion, due primarily toadditional revolving credit facility borrowings at one of our March 2015 call and prepayment of $350.0 million in 75/8% senior notes due 2020. As a result, ourcontrolled subsidiaries. Our total long-term debt to capitalization ratio (representing our long-term debt, including current maturities, divided by the sum of our long-term debt, redeemable noncontrolling interests, and our total stockholders'stockholders’ equity) decreased to 49.6%41.9% at December 31, 2015,2017, from 51.6%44.9% at December 31, 2014.2016.

We have

In September 2017, we issued $350.0 million of 4.125% senior notes due 2025 (the "2025 Notes"), the proceeds of which, along with available cash, were used to fund the September 2017 tender to purchase at a redemption price of 103.563%, $182.9 million principal amount, plus accrued and unpaid interest to, but not including, the date of repurchase, of our 6.375% senior notes due 2022 (the "2022 Notes"), and the October 2017 call and repayment at a redemption price of 103.188% of the $167.1 million remaining outstanding principal amount of the 2022 Notes, plus accrued and unpaid interest to, but not including, the date of repayment.

Our November 2014 senior secured credit facility (Facility) that matures in November 2019, which provides for a $1.2 billion Revolver, along with a term loan facility.matures November 2019. Subject to certain conditions, we also have the abilityopportunity to increase the combined facilityRevolver size by a minimum of $750at least $750.0 million. The Facility is guaranteed by certain of our subsidiaries; and is secured by substantially all of our and our wholly-owned subsidiaries’ receivables and inventories, and by pledges of all shares of our wholly-owned subsidiaries’ capital stock or other equity interests, and intercompany debt held by us as collateral. The Revolver is available to fund working capital, capital expenditures, and other general corporate purposes. The Facility contains financial covenants and other covenants pertaining to our ability (which may under certain circumstances be limited) to make capital expenditures; incur indebtedness; permit liens on property; enter into transactions with affiliates; make restricted payments or investments; enter into mergers, acquisitions or consolidations; conduct asset sales; pay dividends or distributions, andor enter into other specified transactions and activities. Our ability to borrow funds within the terms of the Revolver is dependent upon our continued compliance with the financial and other covenants. At December 31, 2015,2017, we had $1.2 billion of availability on the Revolver, $12.8$11.9 million of outstanding letters of credit and other obligations which reduce availability, and there were no borrowings outstanding.



The financial covenants under our Facility state that we must maintain an interest coverage ratio of not less than 2.50:1.00. Our interest coverage ratio is calculated by dividing our last-twelve trailing monthslast-twelve-months (LTM) consolidated adjusted EBITDA (earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, amortization, and certain other non-cash transactions as allowed in ourthe Facility) by our LTM gross interest expense, less amortization of financing fees. In addition, a net debt (as defined in the Facility) to consolidated LTM adjusted EBITDA (net debt leverage ratio) of not more than 5.00:1.00 must be maintained. If the net debt leverage ratio exceeds 3.50:1:00 at any time, our ability to make certain payments as defined in the Facility (which includes cash dividends to stockholders and share purchases, among other things), is limited. At December 31, 2015,2017, our interest coverage ratio and net debt leverage ratio were 4.76:10.75:1.00 and 2.99:1.35:1.00, respectively. We were, therefore, in compliance with these covenants at December 31, 2015,2017, and we anticipate we will continue to be in compliance during the next twelve months.months.  

36


Working Capital.  We generated cash flow from operations of over $1.0 billion$739.6 million in 2015.2017. Operational working capital (representing amounts invested in trade receivables and inventories, less current liabilities other than income taxes payable and debt) decreased $476.8increased $250.7 million during 2015 to $1.2 billion. Amounts invested$1.6 billion at December  31,  2017. Increases in volumes, pricing and profitability have resulted in increased accounts receivable and inventories, net ofinventory, which have been partially offset by increases in accounts payable decreased $530.5 million in conjunction withand accrued expenses. Operational working capital as a decrease inpercentage of annual net sales and production volume and a significant decrease in the cost of scrap and steel whenis 16.3% at December 31, 2017, as compared to the fourth quarter of 2014.16.7% at December 31, 2016.

Capital Investments.  During 20152017, we invested $114.5$164.9 million in property, plant and equipment, consistentcompared with the $111.8$198.2 million during 2014.2016. Our current estimated 20162018 cash allocation plan includes the investment of betweenapproximately $250 million and $300 million in capital expenditures in our existing and announced operations.


Table of Contents

Cash Dividends.As a reflection of continued confidence in our current and future cash flow generation ability and financial position, we increased our quarterly cash dividend by 20%11% to $0.1375$0.155 per share in 2015the first quarter 2017 (from $0.115$0.140 per share in 2014)2016), resulting in declared cash dividends of $133.2$148.2 million during 2015,2017, compared to $108.6$136.5 million during 2014.2016. We paid cash dividends of $127.6$145.6 million and $105.4$135.8 million during 20152017 and 2014,2016, respectively. Our board of directors, along with executive management, approves the payment of dividends on a quarterly basis. The determination to pay cash dividends in the future is at the discretion of our board of directors, after taking into account various factors, including our financial condition, results of operations, outstanding indebtedness, current and anticipated cash needs and growth plans. In addition, the terms of our senior secured credit facilityFacility and the indentureindentures relating to our senior notes may restrict the amount of cash dividends we can pay.pay.

Other.  During October 2016, our board of directors authorized a share repurchase program of up to $450 million of our common stock. Under the share repurchase program, purchases will take place, as and when, we determine in open market or private transactions made based upon the market price of our common stock, the nature of other investment opportunities or growth projects, our cash flows from operations, and general economic conditions.  The share repurchase program does not require us to acquire any specific number of shares, and may be modified, suspended, extended or terminated by us at any time. We acquired 7.4 million shares of our common stock for $252.2 million during 2017, and 732,000 shares for $25.0 million during 2016, leaving $172.7 million available pursuant to this program. See Part II Other Information, Item 5 Market  For  Registrant’s  Common  Equity, Related  Stockholder  Matters And  Issuer  Purchases  Of  Equity  Securities for additional information.

Our ability to meet our debt service obligations and reduce our total debt will depend upon our future performance which, in turn, will depend upon general economic, financial and business conditions, along with competition, legislation and regulatory factors that are largely beyond our control. In addition, we cannot assure that our operating results, cash flows, access to credit markets and capital resources will be sufficient for repayment of our indebtedness in the future. We believe that based upon current levels of operations and anticipated growth, cash flows from operations, together with other available sources of funds, including additionalif necessary borrowings under our Revolver through its term, which expires in November 2019, will be adequate for the next twelve months for making required payments of principal and interest on our indebtedness, funding working capital requirements, and anticipated capital expenditures.

During 20152017, we received benefits from state and local governments in the form of real estate and personal property tax abatements and credits of approximately $23.6$10.8 million. Based on our current abatements and incentive credits, and utilizing our existing long-lived asset structure, we estimate the remaining annual benefit to our future operations to be approximately $23.6$10.7 million, $23.6$9.4 million, $11.9$3.6 million, $2.5$3.5 million, $1.4$3.4 million, $1.3$3.0 million, and $1.2$2.6 million during the years 20162018 through 2022,2024, respectively.


Table of Contents

Contractual Obligations and Other Long-Term Liabilities



We have the following minimum commitments under contractual obligations, including purchase obligations, as defined by the Securities and Exchange Commission. A "purchase obligation"“purchase obligation” is defined as an agreement to purchase goods or services that is enforceable and legally binding and that specifies all significant terms, including fixed or minimum quantities to be purchased; fixed, minimum or variable price provisions; and the approximate timing of the transaction. Other long-term liabilities are defined as long-term liabilities that are reflected on our balance sheet under generally accepted accounting principles. Based on this definition, the following table includes only those contracts which include fixed or minimum obligations. It does not include normal purchases, which are made in the ordinary course of business. The following table provides aggregated information about outstanding contractual obligations and other long-term liabilities as of December 31, 20152017 (in thousands):

 
 Payments Due By Period 
 
 Total 2016 2017 & 2018 2019 & 2020 2021 & After 

Long-term debt(1)

 $2,628,134 $16,680 $31,397 $606,782 $1,973,275 

Estimated interest payments on debt(2)

  878,816  140,902  281,147  237,984  218,783 

Purchase obligations(3)

  379,364  224,850  50,756  37,158  66,600 

Construction commitments(4)

  69,638  69,638       

Lease commitments

  49,660  14,699  17,043  11,232  6,686 

Other commitments(5)

  3,134  575  750  600  1,209 

Total(6)

 $4,008,746 $467,344 $381,093 $893,756 $2,266,553 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



Payments Due By Period



Total

 

2018

 

2019 & 2020

 

2021 & 2022

 

2023 & After

Long-term debt (1)

$

2,408,852 

 

$

28,795 

 

$

6,783 

 

$

706,882 

 

$

1,666,392 

Estimated interest payments on debt (2)

 

743,754 

 

 

124,049 

 

 

243,039 

 

 

194,902 

 

 

181,764 

Purchase obligations (3)

 

783,742 

 

 

312,736 

 

 

221,079 

 

 

174,590 

 

 

75,337 

Construction commitments (4)

 

74,712 

 

 

74,712 

 

 

 -

 

 

 -

 

 

 -

Lease commitments

 

53,814 

 

 

16,036 

 

 

22,105 

 

 

9,919 

 

 

5,754 

Other commitments (5)

 

2,159 

 

 

350 

 

 

600 

 

 

425 

 

 

784 

Total (6)

$

4,067,033 

 

$

556,678 

 

$

493,606 

 

$

1,086,718 

 

$

1,930,031 

(1)

The long-term debt payment information presented above assumes that our term loan and senior notes remain outstanding until maturity. Refer to Note 3Long-term Debt to the consolidated financial statements elsewhere in this report for additional information regarding these transactions, and our long-term debt.

37


(2)

The estimated interest payments shown above assume interest rates of 1.90% (variable rate at December 31, 2015) on the $237.5 million term loan issued November 2014 maturing in November 2019; 61/8% on our $400.0 million senior unsecured notes due August 2019; 5.125% on our $700.0 million senior unsecured notes due October 2021; 6351/8% on our $350.0 million senior unsecured notes due August 2022; 51/4% on our $400.0 million senior unsecured notes due MarchApril 2023; 5.500% on our $500.0 million senior unsecured notes due October 2024; 0.275%4.125% on our $350.0 million senior unsecured notes due September 2025; 5.00% on our $400.0 million senior unsecured notes due December 2026; 0.225% commitment fee on our available senior secured revolver;Revolver; and an average of 5.5%4.8% on our other debt of $40.6$58.9 million.

(3)

Purchase obligations include commitments we have for the purchase of electricity, natural gas and its transportation, fuel, air products, electrodes, and zinc. These arrangements have "take“take or pay"pay” or other similar commitment provisions. We have utilized such "take“take or pay"pay” requirements during the past three years under these contracts, except for certain air products at our Minnesota ironmaking operations which were idled inhave been idle since May 2015.

(4)

Construction commitments relate to firm contracts we have with various vendors for the completion of certain construction projects at our various divisions at December 31, 2015.

2017.

(5)

Other commitments principally relate to certain pension and deferred compensation plan obligations.

(6)

We expect to make cash outlays in the future related to our unrecognized tax benefits; however, due to the uncertainty of the timing, we are unable to make reasonably reliable estimates regarding the period of cash settlement with the respective taxing authorities. Accordingly, unrecognized tax benefits and related interest and penalties of $21.2$21.5 million as of December 31, 2015,2017, have been excluded from the contractual obligations table above.  Refer to Note 4 Income Taxes to the consolidated financial statements elsewhere in this report for additional information.

Table of Contents

Other Matters

Inflation

We believe that inflation has not had a material effect on our results of operations.

Environmental and Other Contingencies

We have incurred, and in the future will continue to incur, capital expenditures and operating expenses for matters relating to environmental control, remediation, monitoring and compliance. During 2015,2017, we incurred costs related to the monitoring and compliance of environmental matters in the amount of approximately $35.7$39.1 million and capital expenditures related to environmental compliance of approximately $6.2$2.9 million. Of the costs incurred during 20152017 for monitoring and compliance, 78%approximately 77% were related to the normal transportation of certain types of waste produced in our steelmaking processes and other facilities, in accordance with legal requirements. We incurred combined environmental remediation costs of approximately $850,000$623,000 at all of our facilities during 2015.2017. We have an accrual of $2.2$2.9 million recorded for environmental remediation related to our metals recycling operations, and $2.7$2.6 million related to Minnesota ironmaking operations. We believe, apart from our dependence on environmental construction and operating permits for our existing and any future manufacturing facilities, that compliance with current environmental laws and regulations is not likely to have a materially adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations or liquidity; however,liquidity. However, environmental laws and regulations evolve and change, and we may become subject to more stringent environmental laws and regulations in the future, such as the impact of U.S.United States government or various governmental agencies introducing regulatory changes in response to the potential of climate change.

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

        Management'sManagement’s discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations is based upon our consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the U. S.United States. We review the accounting policies we use in reporting our financial results on a regular basis. The preparation of these financial statements requires us to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses and related disclosure of contingent liabilities. We evaluate the appropriateness of these estimations and judgments on an ongoing basis. We base our estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying value of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Results may differ from these estimates due to actual outcomes being different from those on which we based our assumptions. We believe the following critical accounting policies affect our more significant judgments and estimates used in the preparation of our consolidated financial statements.

Revenue Recognition and Allowance for Doubtful Accounts.  Except for our steel fabrication operations, we recognize revenues from sales and the allowance for estimated returns and customer claims from these sales whenat the time title of the product transfers.transfers, upon shipment. Provision is made for estimated product returns and customer claims based on historical experience. If the historical data used in our estimates does not reflect future returns and claims trends, additional provision may be necessary. Our steel fabrication operations recognizes revenues using a percentage of completion methodology based on steel tons used on completed units to date as a percentage of estimated total steel tons required by each contract. The allowance for doubtful accounts for all operating segments is based on the company'sour best estimate of probablyprobable credit losses, along with historical experience, which estimates may or may not prove accurate. Our steel fabrication operations recognizes revenues from construction contracts using a percentage of completion methodology based on steel tons used on completed units to-date as a percentage of estimated total steel tons required by each contract.

We are exposed to credit risk in the event of nonpayment by our customers, which in steel operations are principally intermediate steel processors and service centers that sell our products to


Table of Contents

numerous industry sectors, including the construction, automotive, construction, manufacturing, transportation, heavy and agriculture equipment, and pipe and tube (including OCTG) markets. Our metals recycling operations sell ferrous scrap to

38


steel mills and foundries, and nonferrous scrap, such as copper, brass, aluminum and stainless steel to, among others, ingot manufacturers, copper refineries and mills, smelters, and specialty mills. Our steel fabrication operations sell fabricated steel joists and deck primarily to the non-residential construction market. We maintain an allowance for doubtful accounts for estimated losses resulting from the inability of our customers to make required payments based on known credit risks, historical loss experience and current economic conditions affecting our customers. We mitigate our exposure to credit risk, which we generally extend initially on an unsecured basis, by performing ongoing credit evaluations and taking further action when necessary, such as requiring letters of credit or other security interests to support the receivable from our customer.customer receivable. If the financial condition of our customers were to deteriorate, resulting in the impairment of their ability to make payments, additional allowance may be required.

Inventories.  We record inventories at lower of cost or market.net realizable value. Cost is determined using a weighted average cost method for scrap,raw materials and supplies, and on a first-in, first-out, basis for other inventory. We record amounts required, if any, to reduce the carrying value of inventory to its net realizable value as a charge to cost of goods sold.  If product selling prices were to decline in future periods, further write-down of inventory could result, specifically raw material inventory such as scrap purchased during periods of peak market pricing. Upon deciding to idle the Minnesota ironmaking operations and to monetize existing raw material inventory, we recorded an inventory lower-of-cost or market charge of $21.0 million (inclusive of noncontrolling interests of $3.6 million), in cost of goods sold in the second quarter 2015.

Impairments of Long-Lived Tangible and Definite-LivedDefinite‑Lived Intangible Assets.  We review long-lived assets for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate the carrying amount of such assets may not be fully recoverable. Impairment losses are recorded on long-lived assets used in operations when indicators of impairment are present and the undiscounted cash flows estimated to be generated by those assets are less than the assets'assets’ carrying amounts. The impairment loss is measured by comparing the fair value of the asset to its carrying amount. We consider various factors and determine whether an impairment test is necessary, including by way of examples, a significant and prolonged deterioration in operating results and/or projected cash flows, significant changes in the extent or manner in which an asset is used, technological advances with respect to assets which would potentially render them obsolete, our strategy and capital planning, and the economic climate in markets to be served. When determining future cash flows and if necessary, fair value, we must make judgments as to the expected utilization of assets and estimated future cash flows related to those assets. We consider historical and anticipated future results, general economic and market conditions, the impact of planned business and operational strategies and all other available information at the time the estimates are made. Those estimates and judgments may or may not ultimately prove accurate.

A long-lived asset is classified as held for sale upon meeting specified criteria related to ability and intent to sell. An asset classified as held for sale is measured at the lower of its carrying amount or fair value less cost to sell. As of December 31, 2015,2017 and 2016, the company reported $8.6$8.7 million of land and buildings as$29.3 million, respectively, of assets held for sale within other current assets in our consolidated balance sheet.  An impairment loss is recognized for any initial or subsequent write-down of the asset held for sale to its fair value less cost to sell.  Upon the December 31, 2015, determination and classification of theseFor assets determined to be classified as held for sale the company recorded a $10.3 million asset impairment charge in the consolidated statement of operations for the year ended December 31, 2015.2017 and 2016, the asset carrying amounts approximated their fair value less cost to sell. The company determined fair value using Level 3 fair value inputs as provided for under ASC 820, consisting of information provided by brokers and other external sources along with management'smanagement’s own assumptions.

During

Significant events occurred during the fourth quarter of 2014,2016 that represented impairment indicators related primarily to Mining Resources and Mesabi Mining fixed assets within our Minnesota ironmaking operations reachedoperations. The company therefore undertook a steady state, indicating a consistency in the operation's production capability, processes and cost structure, including the ability to utilize certain lower-cost raw materials. Given this, we undertook anfourth quarter 2016 assessment of the


Table of Contents

recoverability of the carrying valueamounts of primarily our Minnesota ironmaking operation'sMining Resources and Mesabi Mining operation’s fixed assets. With ourthe company’s outlook at thatthe time of this 2016 assessment regarding future operating costs and product pricing, wecash flows, the company concluded that the carrying valueamounts of thesethe fixed assets waswere no longer fully recoverable, and the fixed assetsthey were in fact impaired. This 2016 assessment resulted in a $260.0 million pretax non-cash asset impairment charge of $127.3 million, including amounts attributable to noncontrolling interests of $46.5$13.1 million, which is reflected in "Other" in Note 13, Segment Information.reduced net income attributable to Steel Dynamics, Inc. by $72.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2016. The carrying values of the impaired assets were adjusted to their expectedestimated fair values at that time as determined primarily on the cost approach, as well as expected future discounted cash flows (an income approach,approach), using Level 3 fair value inputs as provided for under ASC 820.

Our goodwill relates to various business combinations and is allocated to the following reporting units at December 31(in31 (in thousands):

 
 2015 2014 

OmniSource—Metals Recycling Operations Segment

 $109,039 $456,727 

Butler Flat Roll Division, Structural and Rail Division, and Engineered Bar Division—Metals Recycling Operations Segment

  95,000  95,000 

The Techs—Steel Operation Segment

  142,783  142,783 

Roanoke Bar Division—Steel Operations Segment

  29,041  29,041 

Columbus Flat Roll Division—Steel Operations Segment

  19,682  19,682 

New Millennium Building Systems—Steel Fabrication Operations Segment

  1,925  1,925 

 $397,470 $745,158 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

2017

 

2016

 



Steel Operations Segment

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



  Columbus Flat Roll Division

 

$

19,682 

 

$

19,682 

 



  The Techs

 

 

142,783 

 

 

142,783 

 



  Vulcan Threaded Products

 

 

7,824 

 

 

7,824 

 



  Roanoke Bar Division

 

 

29,041 

 

 

29,041 

 



Metals Recycling Operations Segment

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



  OmniSource

 

 

90,638 

 

 

97,096 

 



  Indiana Steel Mills

 

 

95,000 

 

 

95,000 

 



Steel Fabrication Operations Segment – New Millennium Building Systems

 

 

1,925 

 

 

1,925 

 



 

 

$

386,893 

 

$

393,351 

 



At least once annually (as of October 1) or when indicators of impairment exist, we performthe company performs an impairment test for goodwill. Goodwill is allocated to various reporting units, which are generally one level below ourthe company’s operating segments. We utilize a two-stepped approach to measuringevaluate goodwill impairment. The first step of the test determines if there is potential goodwill impairment. In this step we comparethe company compares the fair value of the reporting unit to its carrying amount (which includes goodwill). The fair value of the reporting unit is determined by

39


using an estimate of future cash flows utilizing a risk-adjusted discount rate to calculate the net present value of future cash flows (income approach), and by using a market approach based upon an analysis of valuation metrics of comparable peer companies.companies, Level 3 inputs as provided for under ASC 820. If the fair value exceeds the carrying value, there is no impairment. If the carrying amount exceeds the fair value, we performthe company performs the second step of the test, which measures the amount of impairment loss to be recorded. In the second step, we comparethe company compares the carrying amount of the goodwill to the implied fair value of the goodwill based on the net fair value of the recognized and unrecognized assets and liabilities of the reporting unit.unit to which it is allocated. If the implied fair value is less than the carrying value, an impairment loss is recorded to the extent that the fair value of the goodwill is less than its carrying value.

Key assumptions used to determine the estimated fair value of each reporting unit under the discounted cash flows method (income approach) include: (a) expected cash flows for the five-year period following the testing date (including market share, sales volumes and prices, costs to produce and estimated capital needs); (b) an estimated terminal value using a terminal year growth rate determined based on the growth prospects of the reporting unit; and (c) a risk-adjusted discount rate based on management'smanagement’s best estimate of market participants'participants’ after-tax weighted average cost of capital and market risk premiums. Key assumptions used to determine the estimated fair value of each reporting unit under the market approach include the expected revenues and cash flows in the next year. We consider historical and anticipated future results, general economic and market conditions, the impact of planned business and operational strategies and all available information at the time the fair


Table of Contents

values of its reporting units are estimated. Those estimates and judgments may or may not ultimately prove accurate.

Goodwill and other indefinite-lived intangible assets acquired in past transactions are naturally more susceptible to impairment, primarily due to the fact that they are recorded at fair value based on operating plans and economic conditions at the time of acquisition. Consequently, if operating results and/or economic conditions deteriorate after an acquisition, it could result in the impairment of the acquired assets. A deterioration of economic conditions may not only negatively impact the estimated operating cash flows used in our cash flow models, but may also negatively impact other assumptions used in our analyses, including, but not limited to, the estimated cost of capital and/or discount rates. Additionally, we are required to ensure that assumptions used to determine fair value in our analyses are consistent with the assumptions a hypothetical marketplace participant would use. As a result, the cost of capital and/or discount rates used in our analyses may increase or decrease based on market conditions and trends, regardless of whether our actual cost of capital has changed. Therefore, we may recognize an impairment of an intangible asset or assets in spite of realizing actual cash flows that are approximately equal to or greater than our previously forecasted amounts.

        Our other indefinite-lived intangible assets relate to trade names acquired through various business combinations and is allocated to the following reporting units at December 31, (in thousands):

 
 2015 2014 

OmniSource—Metals Recycling Operations Segment

 $39,500 $108,000 

The Techs—Steel Operations Segment

  81,800  81,800 

 $121,300 $189,800 

At least once annually (as of October 1) or when indicators of impairment exist, we test for indefinite-lived intangible assets for impairment through the comparison of the fair value of the specific intangible asset with its carrying amount.  The fair value of the intangible asset is determined by using an estimate of future cash flows attributable to the asset and a risk-adjusted discount rate to compute a net present value of future cash flows.flows (income approach).  If the fair value is less than the carrying value, an impairment loss is recorded in an amount equal to the excess in carrying value.

        DuringOur fourth quarter 2017 annual goodwill impairment analyses did not result in any impairment charges.  Management does not believe that it is reasonably likely that our reporting units will fail step one of a goodwill impairment test in the near term, as the determined fair value of the reporting units with goodwill exceeded their carrying value by more than an insignificant amount. We will continue to monitor operating results within all reporting units throughout the upcoming year to determine if events and circumstances warrant interim impairment testing. Otherwise, all reporting units will again be subject to the required annual impairment test during the fourth quarter of 2018. Changes in judgments and estimates underlying our analysis of goodwill for possible impairment, including expected future operating cash flows and discount rate, could decrease the estimated fair value of our reporting units in the future and could result in an impairment of goodwill.

In 2016, a $5.5 million OmniSource goodwill impairment charge was recorded in conjunction with OmniSource entering into a definitive sale agreement with a third-party pertaining to certain OmniSource long-lived assets (classified and reported as held for sale as of December 31, 2016), inventory and spare parts, as provided under ASC 350.

During our 2015 annual goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible asset impairment assessment, we determined that the fair value of OmniSource was less than its carrying value, and upon the completion of the impairment analysis, that the goodwill and trade name indefinite-lived assets were impaired. The decrease in OmniSource fair value from our prior year impairment analysis was the result of a forecasted reduction in future cash flows based on management's view of the weaker longer-term global scrap commodity outlook. This outlook became clearer in the fourth quarter of 2015 from the longevity of: 1) the prolonged strength of the U.S. dollar decreasing scrap export volume (resulting in excess domestic supply); 2) currency devaluation contributing to China and Russia supplying alternative scrap materials to Turkey, versus those coming from the U.S.; and 3) slower global growth decreasing demand for scrap. While the scrap commodity outlook deteriorated throughout much of 2015, there were indicators of improvement during the year such as the restoration of the ratio of iron ore to scrap costs to a more historically consistent relationship, as well as a mid-year scrap pricing increase, versus the monthly decreases experienced throughout much of the year, including large decreases in both the first and fourth quarters. Upon the fourth quarter decrease in selling prices and resulting metal spreads, we concluded that the impact of the factors noted above were longer-term, which resulted in our reassessment of our future long-term cash flows. The OmniSource goodwill and trade name indefinite-lived intangible assets were written down to their respective fair values, resulting in pretax non-cash asset impairment charges of $341.3 million and $68.5 million, respectively, that are reflected in asset impairment charges in the consolidated statement of operations for the year ended December 31, 2015, within the metals recycling operations.


Table of Contents

        The 2015 annual goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible asset impairment analysis did not result in any impairment charges related to any other of our reporting units. Management does not believe that it is reasonably likely that any of our reporting units will fail step one of a goodwill or indefinite-lived asset impairment test in the near term. We will continue to monitor operating results within all reporting units throughout the upcoming year in order to determine if events and circumstances warrant interim impairment testing. Otherwise, all reporting units will again be subject to the required annual impairment test during the fourth quarter of 2016. Due to the inherent uncertainties involved in forecasting, changes in judgments and estimates underlying our analysis of goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets for possible impairment, including expected future operating cash flows and discount rate, could decrease the estimated fair value of our reporting units in the future, resulting in further impairments.

Income Taxes.  We are required to estimate our income taxes as a part of the process of preparing our consolidated financial statements. This requires us to estimate our actual current tax exposure together with assessing temporary differences resulting from differing treatments of items for tax and accounting purposes. These differences result in deferred tax assets and liabilities, which are included within our consolidated balance sheet. We must then assess the likelihood that our deferred tax assets will be recovered from future taxable income and, to the extent we believe that recovery is not likely, we must establish a valuation allowance. We also establish reserves to reduce some or all of the tax benefit of any of our tax positions at the time we determine that the positions become uncertain. We adjust these reserves, including any impact on the related interest and penalties, in light of changing facts and circumstances, such as the progress of a tax audit. A number of years may elapse before a particular matter for which we have established a reserve is audited by a taxing authority and finally resolved. The number of years with open tax audits varies depending on the tax jurisdiction. The tax benefit that has been previously reserved because of a failure to meet the "more likely than not" recognition threshold would be recognized in our income tax expense in the first interim period when the uncertainty disappears. Settlement of any particular issue would usually require the use of cash.


Table of Contents40


ITEM 7A. ITEM 7A.    QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

Market Risk

In the normal course of business, we are exposed to interest rate changes. Our objectives in managing exposure tofluctuations in interest rate changesrates are to limit the impact of these rate changes on earnings and cash flows and to lower overall borrowing costs. To achieve these objectives, we primarilymay use interest rate swaps to manage net exposure to interest rate changes related to our portfolio of borrowings.

The following table represents the principal cash repayments and related weighted-averageweighted‑average interest rates by maturity date for our long-term debt, as of December 31, 20152017 (in thousands):

 
 Interest Rate Risk 
 
 Fixed Rate Variable Rate 
 
 Principal Average
Rate
 Principal Average
Rate
 

Expected maturity date:

             

2016

 $3,593  4.9%$13,087  2.0%

2017

  3,296  6.1  12,500  1.9 

2018

  3,102  5.9  12,500  1.9 

2019

  403,291  6.1  200,000  1.9 

2020

  3,491  6.0      

Thereafter

  1,973,274  5.5      

Total Debt Outstanding

 $2,390,047  5.6%$238,087  1.9%

Fair value

 $2,495,259    $238,087    



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

Interest Rate Risk

 

 



 

 

Fixed Rate

 

Variable Rate

 

 



 

 

 

 

Average

 

 

 

Average

 

 



 

 

Principal

 

Rate

 

Principal

 

Rate

 

 



Expected maturity date:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



2018

 

$

3,096 

 

 

6.0%

 

$

25,699 

 

 

3.9% 

 

 



2019

 

 

3,291 

 

 

6.0

 

 

 -

 

 

 

 

 



2020

 

 

3,492 

 

 

6.0

 

 

 -

 

 

 

 

 



2021

 

 

703,708 

 

 

5.3

 

 

 -

 

 

 

 

 



2022

 

 

3,174 

 

 

5.5

 

 

 -

 

 

 

 

 



Thereafter

 

 

1,666,392 

 

 

5.0

 

 

 -

 

 

 

 

 



Total Debt Outstanding

 

$

2,383,153 

 

 

5.1%

 

$

25,699 

 

 

3.9% 

 

 



Fair value

 

$

2,474,833 

 

 

 

 

$

25,699 

 

 

 

 

 

Commodity Risk

In the normal course of business we are exposed to the market risk and price fluctuations related to the sale of our products and to the purchase of raw materials used in our operations, such as metallic raw materials, electricity, natural gas and its transportation services, fuel, air products, zinc, and zinc.electrodes. Our risk strategy associated with product sales has generally been to obtain competitive prices for our products and to allow operating results to reflect market price movements dictated by supply and demand.

Our risk strategy associated with the purchase of raw materials utilized within our operations has generally been to make some commitments with suppliers relating to future expected requirements for some commodities such as electricity, natural gas and its transportation services, fuel, air products, zinc, and zinc.electrodes. Certain of these commitments contain provisions which require us to "take“take or pay"pay” for specified quantities without regard to actual usage for periods of up to 24 months5 years for physical commodity requirements for up to 4 years forand commodity transportation requirements, and for up to 1311 years for air products. Our commitments for these arrangements with "take“take or pay"pay” or other similar commitment provisions for the years ending December 31 are as follows (in thousands):

2016

 $224,850 

2017

  32,120 

2018

  18,636 

2019

  20,059 

2020

  17,099 

Thereafter

  66,600 

 $379,364 

Table of Contents





 

 

 

 

 



2018

 

$

312,736 

 



2019

 

 

116,779 

 



2020

 

 

104,300 

 



2021

 

 

90,894 

 



2022

 

 

83,696 

 



Thereafter

 

 

75,337 

 



 

 

$

783,742 

 

We utilized such "take“take or pay"pay” requirements during the past three years under these contracts, except for certain air products at our Minnesota ironmaking operations which were idled inhave been idle since May 2015. We believe that production requirements will be such that consumption of the products or services purchased under these commitments will occur in the normal production process, other than certain air products related to our Minnesota ironmaking operations during the idle period. We also purchase electricity consumed at our Butler Flat Roll Division pursuant to a contract which extends through December 2017. The contract designates 160 hours annually as "interruptible service" and2018, which establishes an agreed fixed-rate energy charge per Mill/kWh consumed for each year through the expiration of the agreement.



In our metals recycling operations, we have certain fixed price contracts with various customers and suppliers for future delivery of nonferrous metals. Our risk strategy has been to enter into base metal financial contracts with the goal to protect the profit margin, within certain parameters, that was contemplated when we entered into the transaction with the customer or vendor. At December 31, 2015,2017, we had a cumulative unrealized loss associated with these financial contracts of $2.2$7.7 million, substantially all of which have a settlement datedates in 2016.2018. We believe the customer contracts associated with the financial contracts will be fully consummated.


41


ITEM 8.

Table of Contents

ITEM 8.    CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA

INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS


Page

Management'sManagement’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

60

43

Reports of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm


61

44

Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 20152017 and 20142016


63

46

Consolidated Statements of Operations for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 20152017


64

47

Consolidated Statements of Equity for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 20152017


65

48

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 20152017


66

49

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements


67

50


42


Table of Contents

MANAGEMENT'SMANAGEMENT’S REPORT ON INTERNALINTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING

The management of Steel Dynamics, Inc. is responsible for the preparation and integrity of the company'scompany’s consolidated financial statements and for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting, as such term is defined in Rule 13a-15(f)13a – 15(f) of the Exchange Act, for the company (including its consolidated subsidiaries). We maintain accounting and internal control systems which are intended to provide reasonable assurance that assets are safeguarded against loss from unauthorized use or disposition, transactions are executed in accordance with management'smanagement’s authorization, and accounting records are reliable for preparing financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. We are dedicated to ensuring that we maintain the high standards of financial accounting and reporting that we have established. Our culture demands integrity and an unyielding commitment to strong internal control practices and policies.

Internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of our assets; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of the financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles; and provide reasonable assurance that our receipts and expenditures are being made only in accordance with authorizations of our management and directors; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of our assets that could have a material effect on our financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not always prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with policies and procedures may deteriorate.

Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our principal executive officer and our principal financial officer, we conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting. The framework on which such evaluation was based upon is contained in the report entitled "Internal“Internal Control—Integrated Framework 2013"Framework” issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (2013 Framework) (the "COSO Report"“COSO criteria”). Based on that evaluation, management concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was effective as of December 31, 2015,2017, the end of the period covered by this report.

/s/ MARKMark D. MILLETT


Millett

/s/ Theresa E. Wagler

Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)

/s/ THERESA E. WAGLER

Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

(Principal Executive Officer)

(Principal Financial Officer)


43


Table of Contents

REPORT OF INDEPENDENTINDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Stockholders and the Board of Directors and Stockholders of
Steel Dynamics, Inc.



Opinion on Internal Control over Financial Reporting

We have audited Steel Dynamics, Inc.'s’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2015,2017, based on criteria established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (2013 Framework) (the COSO criteria). In our opinion, Steel Dynamics, Inc.'s (the Company) maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2017, based on the COSO criteria.

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB), the consolidated balance sheets of Steel Dynamics, Inc. as of December 31, 2017 and 2016, the related consolidated statements of operations, equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2017, and the related notes and our report dated February 27, 2018 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.

Basis for Opinion

The Company’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting included in the accompanying Management'sManagement’s Report on Internal Control overOver Financial Reporting.  Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the company'sCompany’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States).PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects.

Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

Definition and Limitations of Internal Control over Financial Reporting

A company'scompany’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company'scompany’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company'scompany’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

        In our opinion,/s/ Ernst & Young LLP

Indianapolis, Indiana

February 27, 2018

44


REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Stockholders and the Board of Directors of Steel Dynamics, Inc. maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2015, based

Opinion on the COSO criteria.Financial Statements

We also have audited in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), theaccompanying consolidated balance sheets of Steel Dynamics, Inc. (the Company) as of December 31, 20152017 and 2014, and2016, the related consolidated statements of operations, equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2015, of Steel Dynamics, Inc. and our report dated February 26, 2016 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.

/s/ Ernst & Young LLP
Indianapolis, Indiana
February 26, 2016


Table of Contents


REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of
Steel Dynamics, Inc.

        We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Steel Dynamics, Inc. as of December 31, 2015 and 2014,2017, and the related notes (collectively referred to as the “financial statements”).  In our opinion, the financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated statementsfinancial position of the Company at December 31, 2017 and 2016, and the consolidated results of its operations equity, and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2015. These financial statements are the responsibility of the company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.2017, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. 

We conducted our auditsalso have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). (PCAOB), the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2017, based on criteria established in Internal Control-Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (2013 framework), and our report dated February 27, 2018 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.

Basis of Opinion

These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includesmisstatement, whether due to error or fraud. Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence supportingregarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An auditOur audits also includes assessingincluded evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statement presentation.statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

        In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of Steel Dynamics, Inc. at December 31, 2015 and 2014, and the consolidated results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2015, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.

        As discussed in Note 3 and Note 4 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company adopted two amendments to accounting standards that changed its method for the presentation of debt issuance costs and deferred income tax assets and liabilities on the consolidated balance sheet. Adoption of the new standards was applied retrospectively.

        We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), Steel Dynamics, Inc.'s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2015, based on criteria established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (2013 Framework) and our report dated February 26, 2016 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.

/s/ Ernst & Young LLP

We have served as the Company’s auditor since 1999.

Indianapolis, Indiana

February 26, 201627, 2018


Table of Contents45



STEEL DYNAMICS, INC.

CONSOLIDATEDCONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(in thousands, except share data)

 

 

 

 

 


 December 31, 

 

 

 

 

 


 2015 2014 

December 31,

Assets

     

2017

 

 

2016

 

 

 

 

 

Current assets

     

 

 

 

 

 

Cash and equivalents

 $727,032 $361,363 

$

1,028,649 

 

 

$

841,483 

Accounts receivable, net of related allowances of $9,765 and $12,646 as of December 31, 2015, and 2014, respectively

 579,333 859,835 

Accounts receivable, net of related allowances of $15,036 and $14,413 as of

 

 

 

 

 

 

December 31, 2017, and December 31, 2016, respectively

 

846,415 

 

 

 

703,565 

Accounts receivable-related parties

 34,272 42,990 

 

22,422 

 

 

 

26,219 

Inventories

 1,149,390 1,618,419 

 

1,519,347 

 

 

 

1,275,211 

Other current assets

 47,914 55,655 

 

91,509 

 

 

 

83,197 

Total current assets

 2,537,941 2,938,262 

 

3,508,342 

 

 

 

2,929,675 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Property, plant and equipment, net

 2,951,210 3,123,906 

 

2,675,904 

 

 

 

2,787,215 

Restricted cash

 19,565 19,312 

 

16,939 

 

 

 

18,060 

Intangible assets, net of accumulated amortization of $265,940 and $241,731 as of December 31, 2015, and 2014, respectively

 278,960 370,669 

Intangible assets, net of accumulated amortization of $269,868 and $294,676 as of

 

 

 

 

 

 

December 31, 2017, and December 31, 2016, respectively

 

256,909 

 

 

 

283,977 

Goodwill

 397,470 745,158 

 

386,893 

 

 

 

393,351 

Other assets

 16,936 35,852 

 

10,745 

 

 

 

11,454 

Total assets

 $6,202,082 $7,233,159 

$

6,855,732 

 

 

$

6,423,732 

Liabilities and Equity

     

 

 

 

 

 

 

Current liabilities

     

 

 

 

 

 

 

Accounts payable

 $276,725 $489,791 

$

473,765 

 

 

$

382,126 

Accounts payable-related parties

 6,630 21,265 

 

15,683 

 

 

 

13,070 

Income taxes payable

 2,023 6,086 

 

3,696 

 

 

 

5,593 

Accrued payroll and benefits

 94,906 128,968 

 

195,909 

 

 

 

164,543 

Accrued interest

 38,502 50,405 

 

25,533 

 

 

 

30,295 

Accrued expenses

 99,824 107,607 

 

125,138 

 

 

 

113,556 

Current maturities of long-term debt

 16,680 46,460 

 

28,795 

 

 

 

3,632 

Total current liabilities

 535,290 850,582 

 

868,519 

 

 

 

712,815 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Long-term debt

 2,577,976 2,935,389 

 

2,353,145 

 

 

 

2,353,194 

Deferred income taxes

 400,770 506,482 

 

305,949 

 

 

 

448,375 

Other liabilities

 16,595 18,839 

 

21,811 

 

 

 

20,649 

Total liabilities

 

3,549,424 

 

 

 

3,535,033 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Commitments and contingencies

     

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Redeemable noncontrolling interests

 126,340 126,340 

 

111,240 

 

 

111,240 

 

 

 

 

 

Equity

     

 

 

 

 

 

 

Common stock voting, $.0025 par value; 900,000,000 shares authorized; 262,937,139 and 261,420,126 shares issued; and 243,089,514 and 241,449,423 shares outstanding, as of December 31, 2015, and 2014, respectively

 638 635 

Treasury stock, at cost; 19,847,625 and 19,970,703 shares, as of December 31, 2015, and 2014, respectively

 (396,455) (398,898)

Common stock voting, $.0025 par value; 900,000,000 shares authorized;

 

 

 

 

 

265,003,133 and 264,130,544 shares issued; and 237,396,839 and 243,785,485

 

 

 

 

 

shares outstanding, as of December 31, 2017, and December 31, 2016, respectively

 

644 

 

 

641 

Treasury stock, at cost; 27,606,294 and 20,345,059 shares,

 

 

 

 

 

as of December 31, 2017, and December 31, 2016 respectively

 

(665,297)

 

 

(416,829)

Additional paid-in capital

 1,110,253 1,083,435 

 

1,141,534 

 

 

 

1,132,749 

Retained earnings

 1,965,291 2,227,843 

 

2,874,693 

 

 

 

2,210,459 

Total Steel Dynamics, Inc. equity

 2,679,727 2,913,015 

 

3,351,574 

 

 

 

2,927,020 

Noncontrolling interests

 (134,616) (117,488)

 

(156,506)

 

 

 

(149,561)

Total equity

 2,545,111 2,795,527 

 

3,195,068 

 

 

 

2,777,459 

Total liabilities and equity

 $6,202,082 $7,233,159 

$

6,855,732 

 

 

$

6,423,732 





See notes to consolidated financial statements.


Table of Contents46



STEEL DYNAMICS, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTSSTATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

(in thousands, except per share data)

 
 Years Ended December 31, 
 
 2015 2014 2013 

Net sales

          

Unrelated parties

 $7,407,233 $8,481,567 $7,087,101 

Related parties

  187,178  274,385  285,823 

Total net sales

  7,594,411  8,755,952  7,372,924 

Costs of goods sold

  
6,862,693
  
7,789,741
  
6,653,780
 

Gross profit

  731,718  966,211  719,144 

Selling, general and administrative expenses

  
327,626
  
316,214
  
272,777
 

Profit sharing

  23,064  42,126  27,764 

Amortization of intangible assets

  25,312  27,551  31,770 

Asset impairment charges

  428,500  260,000  308 

Operating income (loss)

  (72,784) 320,320  386,525 

Interest expense, net of capitalized interest

  
153,950
  
137,263
  
127,728
 

Other (income) expense, net

  15,383  18,254  (4,033)

Income (loss) before income taxes

  (242,117) 164,803  262,830 

Income tax expense (benefit)

  
(96,947

)
 
73,153
  
99,314
 

Net income (loss)

  (145,170) 91,650  163,516 

Net loss attributable to noncontrolling interests

  
14,859
  
65,374
  
25,798
 

Net income (loss) attributable to Steel Dynamics, Inc.          

 $(130,311)$157,024 $189,314 

Basic earnings (loss) per share attributable to Steel Dynamics, Inc. stockholders

 $(0.54)$0.68 $0.86 

Weighted average common shares outstanding

  242,017  232,547  220,916 

Diluted earnings (loss) per share attributable to Steel Dynamics, Inc. stockholders, including the effect of assumed conversions when dilutive

 $(0.54)$0.67 $0.83 

Weighted average common shares and share equivalents outstanding

  242,017  242,078  238,996 

Dividends declared per share

 $0.55 $0.46 $0.44 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



Years Ended December 31,



2017

 

2016

 

2015



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net sales

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  Unrelated parties

$

9,364,213 

 

$

7,607,180 

 

$

7,407,233 

  Related parties

 

174,584 

 

 

169,929 

 

 

187,178 

     Total net sales

 

9,538,797 

 

 

7,777,109 

 

 

7,594,411 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Costs of goods sold

 

7,956,783 

 

 

6,442,245 

 

 

6,862,693 

     Gross profit

 

1,582,014 

 

 

1,334,864 

 

 

731,718 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Selling, general and administrative expenses

 

394,631 

 

 

374,009 

 

 

328,758 

Profit sharing

 

91,309 

 

 

71,285 

 

 

23,064 

Amortization of intangible assets

 

29,193 

 

 

28,765 

 

 

24,180 

Asset impairment charge

 

 -

 

 

132,839 

 

 

428,500 

     Operating income (loss)

 

1,066,881 

 

 

727,966 

 

 

(72,784)



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interest expense, net of capitalized interest

 

134,399 

 

 

146,037 

 

 

153,950 

Other expense (income), net

 

(2,753)

 

 

17,796 

 

 

15,383 

     Income (loss) before income taxes

 

935,235 

 

 

564,133 

 

 

(242,117)



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Income tax expense (benefit)

 

129,439 

 

 

204,127 

 

 

(96,947)

     Net income (loss)

 

805,796 

 

 

360,006 

 

 

(145,170)



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net loss attributable to noncontrolling interests

 

6,945 

 

 

22,109 

 

 

14,859 

     Net income (loss) attributable to Steel Dynamics, Inc.

$

812,741 

 

$

382,115 

 

$

(130,311)



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Basic earnings (loss) per share attributable to Steel Dynamics,

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  Inc. stockholders

$

3.38 

 

$

1.57 

 

$

(0.54)



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Weighted average common shares outstanding

 

240,132 

 

 

243,576 

 

 

242,017 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Diluted earnings (loss) per share attributable to Steel Dynamics, Inc.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  stockholders, including the effect of assumed conversions

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  when dilutive

$

3.36 

 

$

1.56 

 

$

(0.54)



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Weighted average common shares and share equivalents outstanding

 

241,781 

 

 

245,298 

 

 

242,017 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Dividends declared per share

$

0.62 

 

$

0.56 

 

$

0.55 





See notes to consolidated financial statements.


Table of Contents47



STEEL DYNAMICS, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTSSTATEMENTS OF EQUITY

(in thousands)

 
 Shares  
  
  
  
  
  
  
 
 
 Common
Stock
 Treasury
Stock
 Additional
Paid-In
Capital
 Retained
Earnings
 Noncontrolling
Interests
 Total
Equity
 Redeemable
Noncontrolling
Interests
 
 
 Common Treasury 

Balances at January 1, 2013

  219,523  36,070 $637 $(720,479)$1,037,687 $2,087,620 $(27,623)$2,377,842 $98,814 

Proceeds from exercise of stock options, including related tax effect

  3,132    8  (160) 37,660      37,508   

Dividends declared

            (97,375)   (97,375)  

Conversion of 5.125% convertible senior notes

        4        4   

Acquisition of noncontrolling interest

          (2,232)   2,232     

Contributions from noncontrolling investors

              160  160  17,700 

Distributions to noncontrolling investors

              (439) (439)  

Equity-based compensation

  212  (97)   2,106  12,579  (46)   14,639   

Comprehensive income and net income (loss)

            189,314  (25,798) 163,516   

Balances at December 31, 2013

  222,867  35,973  645  (718,529) 1,085,694  2,179,513  (51,468) 2,495,855  116,514 

Proceeds from exercise of stock options, including related tax effect

  1,770  8  5  (164) 32,466      32,307   

Dividends declared

            (108,630)   (108,630)  

Conversion of 5.125% convertible senior notes

  15,893  (15,893)   317,451  (45,650)     271,801   

Contributions from noncontrolling investors

              97  97  9,826 

Distributions to noncontrolling investors

              (743) (743)  

Equity-based compensation

  919  (117) (15) 2,344  10,925  (64)   13,190   

Comprehensive income and net income (loss)

            157,024  (65,374) 91,650   

Balances at December 31, 2014

  241,449  19,971  635  (398,898) 1,083,435  2,227,843  (117,488) 2,795,527  126,340 

Proceeds from exercise of stock options, including related tax effect

  737  10  1  (211) 10,975      10,765   

Dividends declared

            (133,227)   (133,227)  

Dissolution of noncontrolling interest

            1,082  (1,082)    

Distributions to noncontrolling investors

              (1,187) (1,187)  

Equity-based compensation

  904  (133) 2  2,654  15,843  (96)   18,403   

Comprehensive, and net loss

            (130,311) (14,859) (145,170)  

Balances at December 31, 2015

  243,090  19,848 $638 $(396,455)$1,110,253 $1,965,291 $(134,616)$2,545,111 $126,340 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Additional

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Redeemable



Shares

 

Common

 

Treasury

 

Paid-In

 

Retained

 

Noncontrolling

 

Total

 

Noncontrolling



Common

 

Treasury

 

Stock

 

Stock

 

Capital

 

Earnings

 

Interests

 

Equity

 

Interests

Balances at January 1, 2015

 

241,449 

 

 

19,971 

 

$

635 

 

$

(398,898)

 

$

1,083,435 

 

$

2,227,843 

 

$

(117,488)

 

$

2,795,527 

 

$

126,340 

Proceeds from exercise of stock options,

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  including related tax effect

 

737 

 

 

10 

 

 

 

 

(211)

 

 

10,975 

 

 

 -

 

 

 -

 

 

10,765 

 

 

 -

Dividends declared

 

 -

 

 

 -

 

 

 -

 

 

 -

 

 

 -

 

 

(133,227)

 

 

 -

 

 

(133,227)

 

 

 -

Noncontrolling investors, net

 

 -

 

 

 -

 

 

 -

 

 

 -

 

 

 -

 

 

1,082 

 

 

(2,269)

 

 

(1,187)

 

 

 -

Equity-based compensation

 

904 

 

 

(133)

 

 

 

 

2,654 

 

 

15,843 

 

 

(96)

 

 

 -

 

 

18,403 

 

 

 -

Comprehensive and net loss

 

 -

 

 

 -

 

 

 -

 

 

 -

 

 

 -

 

 

(130,311)

 

 

(14,859)

 

 

(145,170)

 

 

 -

Balances at December 31, 2015

 

243,090 

 

 

19,848 

 

 

638 

 

 

(396,455)

 

 

1,110,253 

 

 

1,965,291 

 

 

(134,616)

 

 

2,545,111 

 

 

126,340 

Proceeds from exercise of stock options,

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  including related tax effect

 

556 

 

 

12 

 

 

 

 

 -

 

 

9,834 

 

 

 -

 

 

 -

 

 

9,837 

 

 

 -

Dividends declared

 

 -

 

 

 -

 

 

 -

 

 

 -

 

 

 -

 

 

(136,472)

 

 

 -

 

 

(136,472)

 

 

 -

Noncontrolling investors, net

 

 -

 

 

 -

 

 

 -

 

 

 -

 

 

 -

 

 

(356)

 

 

7,164 

 

 

6,808 

 

 

(15,100)

Share repurchases

 

(732)

 

 

732 

 

 

 -

 

 

(25,034)

 

 

 -

 

 

 -

 

 

 -

 

 

(25,034)

 

 

 

Equity-based compensation

 

871 

 

 

(247)

 

 

 -

 

 

4,660 

 

 

12,662 

 

 

(119)

 

 

 -

 

 

17,203 

 

 

 -

Comprehensive and net income (loss)

 

 -

 

 

 -

 

 

 -

 

 

 -

 

 

 -

 

 

382,115 

 

 

(22,109)

 

 

360,006 

 

 

 -

Balances at December 31, 2016

 

243,785 

 

 

20,345 

 

 

641 

 

 

(416,829)

 

 

1,132,749 

 

 

2,210,459 

 

 

(149,561)

 

 

2,777,459 

 

 

111,240 

Dividends declared

 

 -

 

 

 -

 

 

 -

 

 

 -

 

 

 -

 

 

(148,231)

 

 

 -

 

 

(148,231)

 

 

 -

Share repurchases

 

(7,439)

 

 

7,439 

 

 

 -

 

 

(252,242)

 

 

 -

 

 

 -

 

 

 -

 

 

(252,242)

 

 

 -

Equity-based compensation

 

1,051 

 

 

(178)

 

 

 

 

3,774 

 

 

8,785 

 

 

(276)

 

 

 -

 

 

12,286 

 

 

 -

Comprehensive and net income (loss)

 

 -

 

 

 -

 

 

 -

 

 

 -

 

 

 -

 

 

812,741 

 

 

(6,945)

 

 

805,796 

 

 

 -

Balances at December 31, 2017

 

237,397 

 

 

27,606 

 

$

644 

 

$

(665,297)

 

$

1,141,534 

 

$

2,874,693 

 

$

(156,506)

 

$

3,195,068 

 

$

111,240 





See notes to consolidated financial statements

48


STEEL DYNAMICS, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(in thousands)



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



Years Ended December 31,



2017

 

2016

 

2015



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Operating activities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

   Net income (loss)

$

805,796 

 

$

360,006 

 

$

(145,170)



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

   Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

       operating activities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

       Depreciation and amortization

 

298,999 

 

 

296,109 

 

 

294,595 

       Asset impairment charge

 

 -

 

 

132,839 

 

 

428,500 

       Equity-based compensation

 

36,197 

 

 

31,656 

 

 

30,181 

       Deferred income taxes

 

(135,899)

 

 

53,846 

 

 

(99,323)

       Other adjustments

 

14,068 

 

 

20,676 

 

 

19,886 

       Changes in certain assets and liabilities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

           Accounts receivable

 

(139,054)

 

 

(106,617)

 

 

311,302 

           Inventories

 

(242,883)

 

 

(115,575)

 

 

488,003 

           Other assets

 

4,188 

 

 

12,053 

 

 

(450)

           Accounts payable

 

96,062 

 

 

106,521 

 

 

(227,092)

           Income taxes receivable/payable

 

(33,889)

 

 

(13,921)

 

 

12,706 

           Accrued expenses

 

36,021 

 

 

75,176 

 

 

(59,513)

       Net cash provided by operating activities

 

739,606 

 

 

852,769 

 

 

1,053,625 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Investing activities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

   Purchases of property, plant and equipment

 

(164,935)

 

 

(198,160)

 

 

(114,501)

   Acquisition of business, net of cash acquired

 

(6,192)

 

 

(123,351)

 

 

(45,000)

   Other investing activities

 

32,022 

 

 

8,618 

 

 

16,874 

       Net cash used in investing activities

 

(139,105)

 

 

(312,893)

 

 

(142,627)



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Financing activities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

   Issuance of current and long-term debt

 

620,041 

 

 

473,903 

 

 

207,930 

   Repayment of current and long-term debt

 

(609,914)

 

 

(728,993)

 

 

(625,924)

   Dividends paid

 

(145,565)

 

 

(135,767)

 

 

(127,569)

   Proceeds from exercise of stock options, including related tax effect

 

 -

 

 

9,564 

 

 

10,781 

   Purchases of treasury stock

 

(252,242)

 

 

(25,034)

 

 

 -

   Other financing activities

 

(25,655)

 

 

(19,098)

 

 

(10,547)

       Net cash provided used in financing activities

 

(413,335)

 

 

(425,425)

 

 

(545,329)



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Increase in cash and equivalents

 

187,166 

 

 

114,451 

 

 

365,669 

Cash and equivalents at beginning of period

 

841,483 

 

 

727,032 

 

 

361,363 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash and equivalents at end of period

$

1,028,649 

 

$

841,483 

 

$

727,032 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Supplemental disclosure information:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  Cash paid for interest

$

135,381 

 

$

150,679 

 

$

160,190 

  Cash paid (refunded) for income taxes, net

$

296,493 

 

$

159,950 

 

$

(9,898)

See notes to consolidated financial statements.




STEEL DYNAMICS, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(in thousands)

 
 Years Ended December 31, 
 
 2015 2014 2013 

Operating activities:

          

Net income (loss)

 $(145,170)$91,650 $163,516 

Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by operating activities:

  
 
  
 
  
 
 

Depreciation and amortization

  294,595  263,325  230,928 

Impairment charges

  428,500  260,000  308 

Equity-based compensation

  22,604  14,016  15,504 

Deferred income taxes

  (99,323) (25,042) 30,737 

Loss on disposal of assets

  9,763  5,561  1,082 

Changes in certain assets and liabilities:

          

Accounts receivable

  311,302  (2,191) (78,237)

Inventories

  488,003  68,730  (108,025)

Other assets

  3,284  3,064  13,705 

Accounts payable

  (227,092) (76,141) 40,141 

Income taxes receivable/payable

  12,706  (22,086) (12,494)

Accrued expenses

  (60,689) 36,686  15,010 

Net cash provided by operating activities

  1,038,483  617,572  312,175 

Investing activities:

  
 
  
 
  
 
 

Purchases of property, plant and equipment

  (114,501) (111,785) (186,843)

Proceeds from maturities of short-term commercial paper, net

      31,520 

Acquisition of business, net of cash acquired

  (45,000) (1,669,449)  

Other investing activities

  9,874  33,967  2,478 

Net cash used in investing activities

  (149,627) (1,747,267) (152,845)

Financing activities:

  
 
  
 
  
 
 

Issuance of current and long-term debt

  207,930  1,822,096  423,965 

Repayments of current and long-term debt

  (612,534) (635,578) (517,978)

Proceeds from exercise of stock options, including related tax effect

  10,781  32,307  37,508 

Contributions from noncontrolling investors

    5,418  17,860 

Distributions to noncontrolling investors

  (1,187) (743) (439)

Dividends paid

  (127,569) (105,379) (94,812)

Debt issuance costs

  (608) (22,219) (6,195)

Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities                   

  (523,187) 1,095,902  (140,091)

Increase (decrease) in cash and equivalents

  365,669  (33,793) 19,239 

Cash and equivalents at beginning of year

  361,363  395,156  375,917 

Cash and equivalents at end of year

 $727,032 $361,363 $395,156 

See notes to consolidated financial statements.


Table of Contents


STEEL DYNAMICS, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Note 1.1. Description of the Business and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Description of the Business

Steel Dynamics, Inc. (SDI), together with its subsidiaries (the company), is a domestic manufacturer of steel products and metals recycler. In the third quarter 2015, theThe company changed its reportable segments, consistent with how it currently manages the business, representinghas three reporting segments: steel operations, metals recycling operations, and steel fabrication operations.  Segment information provided within this Form 10-K, including that within Note 13: Segment Information, has been adjusted for all prior periods consistent with the current reportable segment presentation. Approximately 9% of the company'scompany’s workforce in five locations is represented by collective bargaining agreements, and one of these agreements affecting 1170.4% of the company’s employees at one location expiresexpire during 2016.2018.

Steel Operations Segment

Steel operations include the company'scompany’s Butler Flat Roll Division, Columbus Flat Roll Division—acquired September 16, 2014,Division, The Techs galvanizing lines, Structural and Rail Division, Engineered Bar Products Division, Vulcan Threaded Products, Inc. (Vulcan) – acquired August 1, 2016, Roanoke Bar Division, Steel of West Virginia, and with the third quarter 2015 segment changes, Iron Dynamics (IDI), a liquid pig iron (scrap substitute) production facility that supplies solely the Butler Flat Roll Division. These operations include electric arc furnace steel mills, producing steel from ferrous scrap and scrap substitutes, utilizing continuous casting, automated rolling mills, and tenwith several downstream coating and bar processing lines. Steel operations accounted for 69%, 63%, and 61%72% of the company'scompany’s consolidated net sales during 2015, 2014,2017 and 2013, respectively.2016, and 69% in 2015.

        Butler and Columbus Flat Roll Divisions sell a broad range of sheet steel products, such as hot roll, cold roll and coated steel products, including a wide variety of specialty products, such as light gauge hot roll and galvanized. Butler Flat Roll Division sells other products such as Galvalume® and painted products, while Columbus Flat Roll Division sells other products used to produce non-energy line pipe, and is currently in the construction phase of a $100 million expansion to add painted and Galvalume® capacity. The Techs is comprised of three galvanizing lines which sell specialized galvanized sheet steels used in non-automotive applications. The Structural and Rail Division sells structural steel beams and pilings to the construction market, as well as standard-grade and premium rail to the railroad industry. The Engineered Bar Products Division primarily sells engineered, special-bar-quality and merchant-bar-quality rounds, round-cornered squares, and smaller-diameter round engineered bars. The Roanoke Bar primarily sells merchant steel products, including angles, merchant rounds, flats and channels, and reinforcing bar. Steel of West Virginia primarily sells beams, channels and specialty steel sections. The company's steel operations sell directly to end users and service centers. These products are used in numerous industry sectors, including the automotive, construction, manufacturing, transportation, heavy and agriculture equipment, and pipe and tube (including OCTG) markets.

Metals Recycling Operations Segment

Metals recycling operations consistconsists solely of OmniSource Corporation (OmniSource), the company's metals recycling and includes both ferrous and nonferrous processing, locations,transportation, marketing, brokerage, and ferrous scrap procurement operations.management services. Metals recycling operations accounted for 19%, 25 and 31%15% of the company'scompany’s consolidated net sales during 2015, 2014,2017 and 2013, respectively.


Table of Contents2016 and 19% in 2015.


STEEL DYNAMICS, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

Note 1. Description of the Business and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)

Steel Fabrication Operations Segment

Steel fabrication operations include the company's eightcompany’s New Millennium Building Systems'Systems’ joist and deck plants located throughout the United States, and in Northern Mexico. Revenues from these plants are generated from the fabrication of trusses, girders, steel joists and steel deck used within the non-residential construction industry. Steel fabrication operations accounted for 9%, 7%, and 6% of the company'scompany’s consolidated net sales during 2015, 2014,2017, 2016, and 2013, respectively.2015.

Other

        The "Other" categoryOther operations consists of subsidiary operations that are below the quantitative thresholds required for reportable segments and primarily consist of our Minnesota ironmaking operations that have been idle since May 2015, and severalother smaller joint ventures. Also included in "Other"“Other” are certain unallocated corporate accounts, such as the company'scompany’s senior secured credit facility, senior notes, certain other investments and certain profit sharing expenses.



Our idle Minnesota ironmaking operations consistsconsist of Mesabi Nugget, (owned 82%83% by us); our wholly-owned iron concentratingconcentrate and potential future iron mining operations, Mesabi Mining; and our iron tailings operation, Mining Resources (owned 81% by us). See discussion of 2014 Minnesota ironmaking operations impairment later in Note 1 under "Impairment of Long-Lived Tangible and Definite-Lived Intangible Assets." The Minnesota ironmaking operations were indefinitely idled in May 2015.

        Three years subsequent to Mesabi Nugget achieving certain performance measures (which aswholly-owned (as of December 31, 2015, had not been met), the noncontrolling investor may elect to require2016) iron tailings operations, Mining Resources. As of December 31, 2016, the company to purchase at par valueacquired all (but not less than all)$15.1 million of the Mining Resources noncontrolling investor’s redeemable noncontrolling units it owns at the timefor cancellation and discharge of such election. At any time after that same date, the company may electall obligations owed to purchase at par valueMining Resources and termination of all of the units owned byexisting agreements with the noncontrolling investor.  The $111.2 million par valuePrior to this transaction, the company owned by the noncontrolling investor at December 31, 2015, and 2014 has been reported as redeemable noncontrolling interest in the consolidated balance sheets.

        On the fifth anniversary of the effective date of the formation82% of Mining Resources (2016), the noncontrolling investor has a non-transferable, non-assignable right to require the company to purchase at fair value all (but not less than all) of the units it owns at that time. The $15.1 million value owned by the noncontrolling investor at December 31, 2015, and 2014, has been reported as redeemable noncontrolling interest in the consolidated balance sheet.Resources. 

Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Principles of Consolidation

The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of SDI, together with its whollywholly- and majority-owned or controlled subsidiaries, after elimination of significant intercompany accounts and transactions. Noncontrolling interests represent the noncontrolling owner'sowner’s proportionate share in the equity, income, or losses of the company'scompany’s majority-owned or controlled consolidated subsidiaries.

Use of Estimates

These consolidated financial statements are prepared in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States, and accordingly, include amounts that require management to make


Table of Contents


STEEL DYNAMICS, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

Note 1. Description of the Business and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)

estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the consolidated financial statements and in the notes thereto. Significant items subject to such estimates and assumptions include the carrying value of property, plant and equipment, intangible assets, and goodwill; valuation allowances for trade receivables, inventories and deferred income tax assets; unrecognized tax benefits; potential environmental liabilities; and litigation claims and settlements. Actual results may differ from these estimates and assumptions.

50


STEEL DYNAMICS, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

Note 1. Description of the Business and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)

Revenue Recognition and Allowances for Doubtful Accounts



Except for the steel fabrication operations, the company recognizes revenues from sales and the allowance for estimated returns and claims from these sales at the time the title of the product transfers, upon shipment. Provision is made for estimated product returns and customer claims based on historical experience. If the historical data used in the estimates does not reflect future returns and claims trends, additional provision may be necessary. The company'scompany’s steel fabrication operations recognizesrecognize revenues from construction contracts utilizing a percentage of completion methodology based on steel tons used on completed units to date as a percentage of estimated total steel tons required for each contract. The allowance for doubtful accounts for all operating segments is based on the company'scompany’s best estimate of probable credit losses, along with historical experience.

Cash and Equivalents

Cash and equivalents include all highly liquid investments with a maturity of three months or less at the date of acquisition. Restricted cash is primarily funds held in escrow as required by various insurance and government organizations.

Inventories

Inventories

Inventories are stated at lower of cost or market.net realizable value. Cost is determined using a weighted average cost method for scrap,raw materials and supplies, and on a first-in, first-out basis for other inventory. Inventory consisted of the following at December 31 (in thousands):

 
 2015 2014 

Raw materials

 $419,608 $764,883 

Supplies

  396,349  374,599 

Work in progress

  90,486  128,882 

Finished goods

  242,947  350,055 

 $1,149,390 $1,618,419 

Investments

The company has investments in certain joint ventures and closely-held companies in which ownership varies between 49% and 50%. For these investments where the company does not have effective control, the company accounts for the investment using the equity method of accounting. Investments in companies in which the company does not exercise control and its ownership is less than 20% are carried at cost. These investments are reflected in other long-term assets on the company's balance sheet in an amount of $6.4 million and $18.4 million at December 31, 2015, and




 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

2017

 

2016

 



Raw materials

$

675,715 

 

$

515,924 

 



Supplies

 

374,515 

 

 

383,134 

 



Work in progress

 

128,565 

 

 

103,606 

 



Finished goods

 

340,552 

 

 

272,547 

 



Total inventories

$

1,519,347 

 

$

1,275,211 

 

Table of Contents


STEEL DYNAMICS, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

Note 1. Description of the Business and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)

2014, respectively. The company's equity in the income (losses) of investments accounted for using the equity method of accounting are recorded in other (income) expenses, net, in our consolidated statements of operations.

Property, Plant and Equipment

Property, plant and equipment are stated at cost, which includes capitalized interest on construction-in-progressconstruction in progress amounts, and is reduced by proceeds received from certain state and local government grants and other capital cost reimbursements. The company assigns each fixed asset a useful life ranging from 3 to 20 years for plant, machinery and equipment, and 10 to 40 years for buildings and improvements. Repairs and maintenance are expensed as incurred. Depreciation is provided utilizing the straight-line depreciation methodology, or the units-of-production depreciation methodology for certain production related assets, based on units produced, subject to a minimum and maximum level. Depreciation expense was $263.2$263.7 million, $229.4$260.6 million, and $192.4$263.2 million for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016, and 2015, 2014, and 2013, respectively.

        The company's property, plant and equipment at December 31 consisted of the following (in thousands):

 
 2015 2014 

Land and improvements

 $328,739 $334,583 

Buildings and improvements

  706,708  713,837 

Plant, machinery and equipment

  3,966,181  3,898,275 

Construction in progress

  76,074  63,344 

  5,077,702  5,010,039 

Less accumulated depreciation

  2,126,492  1,886,133 

Property, plant and equipment, net

 $2,951,210 $3,123,906 

Intangible Assets

        The company's intangible assets, at December 31, consisted of the following (in thousands):

 
 2015 2014 Useful Life Weighted
Average
Amortization
Period

Customer and scrap generator relationships

 $420,400 $419,400 10 to 25 years 19 years

Trade names

  121,300  189,800 Indefinite 

Trade name

  3,200  3,200 12 years 12 years

  544,900  612,400   19 years

Less accumulated amortization

  265,940  241,731    

 $278,960 $370,669    

   Refer to "ImpairmentImpairment of GoodwillLong-Lived Tangible and Indefinite-LivedDefinite-Lived Intangible Assets"Assets below in Note 1 for discussiondiscussions regarding the 2015 impairmentimpairments of OmniSource trade name. various property, plant and equipment in 2016 and 2015.

The company’s property, plant and equipment consisted of the following at December 31 (in thousands):



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

2017

 

2016

 



Land and improvements

 

$

314,854 

 

$

311,005 

 



Buildings and improvements

 

 

723,504 

 

 

709,809 

 



Plant, machinery and equipment

 

 

4,035,717 

 

 

3,975,560 

 



Construction in progress

 

 

91,433 

 

 

70,615 

 



 

 

 

5,165,508 

 

 

5,066,989 

 



Less accumulated depreciation

 

 

2,489,604 

 

 

2,279,774 

 



Property, plant and equipment, net

 

$

2,675,904 

 

$

2,787,215 

 

51


STEEL DYNAMICS, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

Note 1. Description of the Business and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)

Intangible Assets

The company’s intangible assets consisted of the following at December 31 (in thousands):



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Weighted

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Average

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Useful

 

Amortization

 



 

2017

 

2016

 

Life

 

Period

 



Customer and scrap generator relationships

$

394,062 

 

$

446,688 

 

5 to 25 years

 

21 years

 



Trade names

 

130,550 

 

 

130,550 

 

15 to 25 years

 

18 years

 



Other

 

2,165 

 

 

1,415 

 

3 to 5 years

 

4 years

 



 

 

526,777 

 

 

578,653 

 

 

 

20 years

 



Less accumulated amortization

 

269,868 

 

 

294,676 

 

 

 

 

 



 

$

256,909 

 

$

283,977 

 

 

 

 

 

The company utilizes an accelerated amortization methodology for customer and scrap generator relationships in order to follow


Table of Contents


STEEL DYNAMICS, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

Note 1. Description of the Business and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)

the pattern in which the economic benefits of the amounts are anticipated to be consumed.  Definite-lived tradeTrade names are amortized using a straight linestraight-line methodology. Amortization of intangible assets was $25.3$29.2 million, $26.4$28.8 million, and $30.5$24.2 million for the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014,2017, 2016, and 2013,2015, respectively. Estimated amortization expense related to amortizable intangibles for the years ending December 31 is as follows (in thousands):

2016

 $22,039 

2017

  19,257 

2018

  16,723 

2019

  15,184 

2020

  13,365 

Thereafter

  71,092 

Total

 $157,660 



 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 



2018

 

$

26,910 

 



2019

 

 

24,823 

 



2020

 

 

22,629 

 



2021

 

 

20,840 

 



2022

 

 

19,231 

 



Thereafter

 

 

142,476 

 



Total

 

$

256,909 

 

Impairment of Long-Lived Tangible and Definite-LivedDefinite‑Lived Intangible Assets

The company reviews long-lived assets for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate the carrying amount of such assets may not be fully recoverable.  Impairment losses are recorded on long-lived assets used in operations when indicators of impairment are present and the undiscounted cash flows estimated to be generated by those assets are less than the assets'assets’ carrying amounts.  The impairment loss is measured by comparing the fair value of the assetassets to its carrying amount. We considerThe company considers various factors and determinedetermines whether an impairment test is necessary, including by way of examples, a significant and prolonged deterioration in operating results and/or projected cash flows, significant changes in the extent or manner in which an asset is used, technological advances with respect to assets which would potentially render them obsolete, our strategy and capital planning, and the economic climate in markets to be served.



A long-lived asset is classified as held for sale upon meeting specified criteria related to ability and intent to sell. An asset classified as held for sale is measured at the lower of its carrying amount or fair value less cost to sell. As of December 31, 2015,2017 and 2016, the company reported $8.6$8.7 and $29.3 million, respectively, of assets held for sale within other current assets in our consolidated balance sheet.  An impairment loss is recognized for any initial or subsequent write-down of the asset held for sale to its fair value less cost to sell.  Upon the December 31, 2015, determination and classification of theseFor assets determined to be classified as held for sale in the year ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, the asset carrying amounts approximated their fair value less cost to sell. The company recorded a $10.3 million asset impairment charge in the consolidated statement of operations for assets determined to be classified as held for sale in the year ended December 31, 2015.  The company determined fair value using Level 3 fair value inputs as provided for under ASC 820, consisting of information provided by brokers and other external sources along with management'smanagement’s own assumptions.

During

Significant events occurred during the fourth quarter of 2014,2016, including the company'spreviously noted termination of all existing agreements with the Mining Resources noncontrolling investor, that represented impairment indicators related primarily to Mining Resources and Mesabi Mining fixed assets within our Minnesota ironmaking operations reachedoperations. The company therefore undertook a steady operating state, indicating a consistency in the operations' production capability, processes and cost structure, including the ability to utilize certain lower-cost raw materials. Given this, the company undertook anfourth quarter 2016 assessment of the recoverability of the carrying valueamounts of its Minnesota ironmaking operations'primarily our Mining Resources and Mesabi Mining operation’s fixed assets.  With the company'scompany’s outlook at the time of this 2016 assessment regarding future operating costs and product pricing,cash flows, the company concluded that the carrying valueamounts of thesethe fixed assets waswere no longer fully recoverable, and the fixed assetsthey were in fact impaired. This 2016 assessment resulted in a $260.0 million pretax non-cash asset impairment charge of $127.3 million, including amounts attributable to noncontrolling interests of


Table of Contents


STEEL DYNAMICS, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

Note 1. Description of the Business and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)

$46.5 $13.1 million, which is reflected in "Other" in Note 13, Segment Information.reduced net income attributable to Steel Dynamics, Inc. by $72.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2016.  The carrying values of the impaired assets were adjusted to their estimated fair values at that time as determined primarily on the cost approach, as well as expected future discounted cash flows (an income approach), using Level 3 fair value inputs as provided for under ASC 820. The Minnesota ironmaking operations were indefinitely idled in May 2015.

Goodwill52

 


STEEL DYNAMICS, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

Note 1. Description of the Business and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)

Goodwill

The company'scompany’s goodwill is allocated to the following reporting units at December 31 (in thousands):

 
 2015 2014 

OmniSource—Metals Recycling Operations Segment

 $109,039 $456,727 

Butler Flat Roll Division, Structural and Rail Division, and Engineered Bar Division—Metals Recycling Operations Segment

  95,000  95,000 

The Techs—Steel Operations Segment

  142,783  142,783 

Roanoke Bar Division—Steel Operations Segment

  29,041  29,041 

Columbus Flat Roll Division—Steel Operation Segment

  19,682  19,682 

New Millennium Building Systems—Steel Fabrication Operations Segment

  1,925  1,925 

 $397,470 $745,158 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

2017

 

2016

 



Steel Operations Segment

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



  Columbus Flat Roll Division

 

$

19,682 

 

$

19,682 

 



  The Techs

 

 

142,783 

 

 

142,783 

 



  Vulcan Threaded Products

 

 

7,824 

 

 

7,824 

 



  Roanoke Bar Division

 

 

29,041 

 

 

29,041 

 



Metals Recycling Operations Segment

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



  OmniSource

 

 

90,638 

 

 

97,096 

 



  Indiana Steel Mills

 

 

95,000 

 

 

95,000 

 



Steel Fabrication Operations Segment – New Millennium Building Systems

 

 

1,925 

 

 

1,925 

 



 

 

$

386,893 

 

$

393,351 

 

In 2015, a $341.3 million OmniSource goodwill impairment charge was recorded pursuant to the company's annual review for impairment of goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets, as discussed further under "Impairment of Goodwill and Indefinite-Lived Intangible Assets" below. Cumulative OmniSource goodwill impairment charges are $341.3 million at December 31, 2015.

OmniSource goodwill decreased $6.4$6.5 million in 2015,2017 in recognition of the 20152017 tax benefit related to the normal amortization of the component of OmniSource tax-deductible goodwill in excess of book goodwill.

Impairment  In 2016, a $5.5 million OmniSource goodwill impairment charge was recorded in conjunction with OmniSource entering into a definitive sale agreement with a third-party pertaining to certain OmniSource long-lived assets (classified and reported as held for sale as of December 31, 2016), inventory and spare parts, as provided under ASC 350.  In 2015, a $341.3 million OmniSource goodwill impairment charge was recorded pursuant to the company’s annual review for impairment of goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets, as discussed further under “Impairment of Goodwill and Indefinite-Lived Intangible AssetsAssets” below. Cumulative OmniSource goodwill impairment charges were $346.8 million at December 31, 2017 and 2016.



Impairment of Goodwill and Indefinite‑Lived Intangible Assets

At least once annually (as of October 1) or when indicators of impairment exist, the company performs an impairment test for goodwill and other indefinite-lived intangible assets.goodwill. Goodwill is allocated to various reporting units, which are generally one level below the company'scompany’s operating segments. The company utilizes a two-stepped approach to evaluate goodwill impairment. The first step of the test determines if there is potential goodwill impairment. In this step, the company compares the fair value of the reporting unit to its carrying amount (which includes goodwill). The fair value of the reporting unit is determined by using an estimate of future cash flows utilizing a risk-adjusted discount rate to calculate the net present value of future cash flows (income approach), and by using a market approach based upon an analysis of valuation metrics of comparable peer companies, using Level 3 fair value inputs as provided for under ASC 820. If the fair value exceeds the carrying value, there is no impairment. If the carrying amount exceeds the fair value, the company performs the second step of the test, which measures the amount of impairment loss to be recorded. In the second step, the company compares the


Table of Contents


STEEL DYNAMICS, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

Note 1. Description of the Business and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)

carrying amount of the goodwill to the implied fair value of the goodwill based on the net fair value of the recognized and unrecognized assets and liabilities of the reporting unit to which it is allocated. If the implied fair value is less than the carrying value, an impairment loss is recorded to the extent that the fair value of the goodwill is less than its carrying value.

At least once annually (as of October 1) or when indicators of impairment exist, the company tests indefinite-lived intangible assets for impairment through the comparison of the fair value of the specific intangible asset with its carrying amount. The fair value of the intangible asset is determined by using an estimate of future cash flows attributable to the asset and a risk-adjusted discount rate to compute a net present value of future cash flows (income approach). If the fair value is less than the carrying value, an impairment loss is recorded in an amount equal to the excess in carrying value.

During the company'scompany’s 2015 annual goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible asset impairment analysis, wethe company determined that the fair value of OmniSource was less than its carrying value, and upon the completion of the second step of the impairment analysis, that the goodwill and trade name indefinite-lived intangible assets were impaired.  The decrease in OmniSource fair value from prior impairment analysis was due primarily to the reduction in expected future cash flows based on management's view of the weak shorter and longer-term global scrap commodity outlook. The OmniSource goodwill and trade name indefinite-lived intangible assets were written down to their respective fair values at that time, resulting in non-cash asset impairment chargescharge of $341.3 million and $68.5 million, respectively, that are reflected in asset impairment chargescharge in the consolidated statement of operations for the year ended December 31, 2015, within the metals recycling operations.  No impairment was identified during the company’s 2017 and 2016 annual goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible asset impairment analysis.

Equity‑Based Compensation

Equity-Based Compensation

The company has several stock-basedstock‑based employee compensation plans which are more fully described in Note 6.6 Equity-Based Incentive Plans. Compensation expense for restricted stock units, deferred stock units, restricted stock, and performance awards is recorded over the vesting periods using the fair value as determined by the closing fair market value of the company'scompany’s common stock on the grant date, and with respect to performance awards, an estimate of probability of award achievement during the performance period. The company recognizes forfeitures as they

53


STEEL DYNAMICS, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

Note 1. Description of the Business and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)

occur.  Compensation expense for these stock-basedstock‑based employee compensation plans was $27.1$36.6 million, $22.8$30.4 million, and $15.2$27.1 million for the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014,2017, 2016, and 2013,2015, respectively.

Income Taxes

The company accounts for income taxes and the related accounts under the liability method. Deferred tax liabilities and assets are determined based on the difference between the financial statement and tax bases of assets and liabilities using enacted rates expected to be in effect during the year in which the basis differences reverse.

Earnings Per Share

Basic earnings per share is based on the weighted average shares of common stock outstanding during the period. Diluted earnings per share assumes the weighted average dilutive effect of common share equivalents outstanding during the period applied to the company'scompany’s basic earnings per share. Common share equivalents represent potentially dilutive stock options, restricted stock units, deferred stock units, restricted stock, and in 2014 and 2013, dilutive shares related to the company's convertible subordinated debt;performance awards, and are excluded from the computation in periods in which they have an anti-dilutive effect.


Table There were no anti-dilutive common stock equivalents as of Contents


STEEL DYNAMICS, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

Note 1. Description ofand for the Businessyears ended December 31, 2017 and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)

2016. There were 1.5 million anti-dilutive common stock equivalents as of and for the year ended December 31, 2015. There were no anti-dilutive common share equivalents at or for the year ended December 31, 2014, and 2013.

The following table presents a reconciliation of the numerators and the denominators of the company'scompany’s basic and diluted earnings per share computations for the years ended December 31 (in thousands, except per share data):

 
 2015 
 
 Net Loss
(Numerator)
 Shares
(Denominator)
 Per Share
Amount
 

Basic earnings per share

 $(130,311) 242,017 $(0.54)

Dilutive stock options, deferred stock units, and restricted stock units

        

Diluted earnings per share

 $(130,311) 242,017 $(0.54)



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

2017

 

 

2016



 

Net Income

 

Shares

 

Per Share

 

 

Net Income

 

Shares

 

Per Share



 

(Numerator)

 

(Denominator)

 

Amount

 

 

(Numerator)

 

(Denominator)

 

Amount

Basic earnings per share

 

$

812,741 

 

 

240,132 

 

$

3.38 

 

 

$

382,115 

 

 

243,576 

 

$

1.57 

   Dilutive common share equivalents

 

 

 -

 

 

1,649 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 -

 

 

1,722 

 

 

 

Diluted earnings per share

 

$

812,741 

 

 

241,781 

 

$

3.36 

 

 

$

382,115 

 

 

245,298 

 

$

1.56 



 
 2014 2013 
 
 Net Income
(Numerator)
 Shares
(Denominator)
 Per Share
Amount
 Net Income
(Numerator)
 Shares
(Denominator)
 Per Share
Amount
 

Basic earnings per share

 $157,024  232,547 $0.68 $189,314  220,916 $0.86 

Dilutive stock options, deferred stock units, and restricted stock units

    1,828       1,392    

5.125% convertible senior notes

  4,327  7,703     9,432  16,688    

Diluted earnings per share

 $161,351  242,078 $0.67 $198,746  238,996 $0.83 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



2015

 



Net Loss

 

Shares

 

Per Share

 



(Numerator)

 

(Denominator)

 

Amount

 

Basic earnings per share

$

(130,311)

 

 

242,017 

 

$

(0.54)

 

   Dilutive common share equivalents

 

 -

 

 

 -

 

 

 

 

Diluted earnings per share

$

(130,311)

 

 

242,017 

 

$

(0.54)

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Concentration of Credit Risk

Financial instruments that potentially subject the company to significant concentrations of credit risk principally consist of temporary cash investments and accounts receivable. The company places its temporary cash investments with high credit quality financial institutions and companies, and limits the amount of credit exposure from any one entity. The company is exposed to credit risk in the event of nonpayment by customers. The company mitigates its exposure to credit risk, which it generally extends initially on an unsecured basis, by performing ongoing credit evaluations and taking further action if necessary, such as requiring letters of credit or other security interests to support the customer receivable. Management'sManagement’s estimation of the allowance for doubtful accounts is based upon known credit risks, historical loss experience and current economic conditions affecting the company'scompany’s customers. Customer accounts receivable are charged off when all collection efforts have been exhausted and the amounts are deemed uncollectible. Heidtman Steel Products (Heidtman), a related party, accounted for 5%2% and 3% of the company'scompany’s net accounts receivable at December 31, 2015,2017, and 4% at December 31, 2014.2016.

Derivative Financial Instruments

The company recognizes all derivatives as either assets or liabilities in the consolidated balance sheets and measures those instruments at fair value. Derivatives that are not designated as hedges must


Table of Contents


STEEL DYNAMICS, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

Note 1. Description of the Business and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)

be adjusted to fair value through earnings. Changes in the fair value of derivatives that are designated as hedges, depending on the nature of the hedge, are recognized as either an offset against the change in fair value of the hedged balance sheet item in the case of fair value hedges or as other comprehensive income in the case of cash flow hedges, until the hedged item is recognized in earnings. The ineffective portion of a derivative'sderivative’s change in fair value is immediately recognized in earnings. The company offsets fair value amounts recognized for derivative instruments executed with the same counterparty under master netting agreements.

54


STEEL DYNAMICS, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

Note 1. Description of the Business and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)

In the normal course of business, the company has derivative financial instruments in the form of forward contracts in various commodities, may have involvement with derivative financial instruments related to managing fluctuations in interest rates, foreign exchange rates, and forward contracts in various commodities.the past has had derivative financial instruments related to managing fluctuations in interest rates. At the time of acquiring these financial instruments, the company designates and assigns these instruments as hedges of specific assets, liabilities or anticipated transactions. When hedged assets or liabilities are sold or extinguished, or the anticipated transaction being hedged is no longer expected to occur, the company recognizes the gain or loss on the designated hedged financial instrument.

The company routinely enters into forward contracts in various commodities, primarily nonferrous metals (specifically aluminum copper, nickel and silver)copper) in our metals recycling operations, to reduce exposure to commodity related price fluctuations. The company does not enter into these derivative financial instruments for speculative purposes.

Recently Adopted/Issued Accounting Standards



In May 2014, the FASB issued guidanceASU 2014-09, which is codified in ASC 606, Revenue Recognition—Recognition – Revenue from Contracts with Customers, which amends the guidance in former ASC 605, Revenue Recognition.Recognition.  FASB has since issued clarifying guidance in the form of ASU 2016-08, Revenue from Contracts with Customers: Principal versus Agent Consideration (Reporting Revenue Gross versus Net), ASU 2016-10, Revenue from Contract with Customers: Identifying Performance Obligations and Licensing, and ASU 2016-12, Revenue from Contracts with Customers: Narrow-Scope Improvements and Practical Expedients, collectively (ASC 606). The core principle of ASC 606 is that an entity should recognize revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. Because the guidance in ASC 606 is principles-based, it can be applied to all contracts with customers regardless of industry-specific or transaction-specific fact patterns. Additionally, ASC 606also requires additional disclosures to help users of financial statements better understand the nature, amount, timing, and potential uncertainty of revenue that is recognized. ThisASC 606 guidance is effective for annual and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2017, but can becould have been early adopted for annual and interim periods ending after December 15, 2016.2016, using a full retrospective or modified retrospective approach. The company is currently evaluatinghas completed its adoption plan in which it identified revenue streams, and analyzed those revenue streams, based on a detailed review of its business and contracts, pursuant to the impactnew accounting requirements.  The company concluded that there will be no change in the amount or timing of revenue recognized under the provisions ofnew standard, or significant changes required to the company’s functions, processes or systems. The company has adopted ASC 606 includingin the timingfirst quarter of adoption.2018 using the modified retrospective approach.

In August 2014,February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2014-15, Presentation2016-02, Leases (Topic 842): which establishes a new lease accounting model that requires lessees to recognize a right of Financial Statements—Going Concern (Subtopic 205-40: Disclosureuse asset and related lease liability for most leases having lease terms of Uncertainties about an Entity's Abilitymore than 12 months (ASU 2016-02).  Leases with a term of 12 months or less will be accounted for similar to Continue as a Going Concern),existing guidance for operating leases.  This new guidance is effective for annual and interim periods ending after December 15, 2016. ASU 2014-15 requires management to evaluate whether there are conditions or events, considered in aggregate, that raise substantial doubt about the entity's ability to continue as a going concern within one year after the date that the financial statements are issued. There are required disclosures if principal conditions or events are identified that raised substantial doubt about the entity's ability to continue as a going concern (before consideration of management's plans), as well as management's evaluation of the significance of those conditions or events in relation to the entity's ability to meet its obligations, and management's plans that alleviated substantial doubt about the entity's ability to continue as a going


Table of Contents


STEEL DYNAMICS, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

Note 1. Description of the Business and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)

concern. This ASU is not expected to have any impact on our overall results of operations, financial position or cash flows.

        In July 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-11, Inventory (Topic 330): Simplifying the Measurement of Inventory, which requires an entity to measure inventory at the lower of cost and net realizable value, rather than at the lower of cost or market. This new guidance is effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2016,2018, but can be early adopted.  The company is currently evaluating the impact of this ASU's adoption.the provisions of ASU 2016-02, and anticipates adopting on January 1, 2019. 

Note 2. AcquisitionsAcquisition

Consolidated Systems,Vulcan Threaded Products, Inc.(CSi)

On September 14, 2015,

In August 2016, the company purchased from CSi certainacquired 100% of its steel deck facilities (including associated assets) and net working capital of approximately $30.0 million,Vulcan in Pelham, Alabama, for a purchase price of $45.0$113.0 million in cash. Operatingcash from available funds. Vulcan is the nation’s largest manufacturer and supplier of threaded rod products, and also produces cold drawn and heat treated bar. The acquisition of Vulcan is consistent with one of our target growth objectives – higher-margin downstream business opportunities that utilize our steel products in their manufacturing processes. Vulcan utilizes special-bar-quality products produced at our Engineered Bar Products Division. Post-closing operating results of these facilities have beenVulcan are reflected in the company's financial statements under the steel fabrication operations since the September 14, 2015, purchase date. The purchased assets include two deck facilities located in Memphis, Tennessee, and Phoenix, Arizona. Producing both standard and premium specialty deck profiles, the new locations will allow for enhanced geographic reach into the southwestern and western markets, and further diversify New Millennium Building Systems' product offerings.reporting segment.

Severstal Columbus, LLC(Columbus Flat Roll Division)55

 The company completed its acquisition of 100% of Columbus Flat Roll Division on September 16, 2014, for a purchase price of $1.625 billion, with additional working capital adjustments of $44.4 million. The acquisition was funded through the issuance of $1.2 billion in Senior Notes, borrowings under the company's senior secured credit facility, and available cash. The company purchased Columbus Flat Roll Division to significantly expand and diversify its steel operating base with the addition of 3.4 million tons of hot roll steel production capacity. The product offerings are diversified with respect to width, gauge, and strength when compared to the capabilities of our Butler Flat Roll Division. Located in northeast Mississippi, Columbus Flat Roll Division is one of the newest and most technologically advanced sheet steel electric arc furnace mills in North America. Additionally, Columbus Flat Roll Division is advantageously located to serve the growing markets in the southern U.S. and Mexico, providing the company with geographic diversification and growth opportunities.


        Unaudited Pro forma Information.    Columbus Flat Roll Division's operating results have been reflected in the company's financial statements since the effective date of the acquisition, September 16, 2014, in steel operations. The following unaudited pro forma information is presented below for comparison purposes as if the Columbus Flat Roll Division acquisition was completed as of January 1, 2013, (in thousands):

 
 Years Ended December 31, 
 
 2014 2013 

Net Sales

 $10,355,774 $9,193,344 

Net Income attributable to Steel Dynamics, Inc. 

  264,779  155,357 

Table of Contents


STEEL DYNAMICS, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

Note 2. Acquisitions (Continued)

        The pro forma results reflect the pre-acquisition operations of Columbus Flat Roll Division for the years ended December 31, 2014, and 2013. The information presented is for information purposes only and is not necessarily indicative of the actual results that would have occurred had the acquisition been consummated at January 1, 2013, nor are they necessarily indicative of future operating results of the combined companies under the ownership and management of the company.

Note 3. Long-Term Debt

The company'scompany’s borrowings consisted of the following at December 31 (in thousands):

 
 2015 2014 

Senior term loan

 $237,500 $250,000 

61/8% senior notes due 2019

  400,000  400,000 

75/8% senior notes due 2020

    350,000 

5.125% senior notes due 2021

  700,000  700,000 

63/8% senior notes due 2022

  350,000  350,000 

51/4% senior notes due 2023

  400,000  400,000 

5.500% senior notes due 2024

  500,000  500,000 

Other obligations

  40,634  74,166 

Total debt

  2,628,134  3,024,166 

Less debt issuance costs

  33,478  42,317 

Total amounts outstanding

  2,594,656  2,981,849 

Less current maturities

  16,680  46,460 

Long-term debt

 $2,577,976 $2,935,389 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

2017

 

2016

 



 

5.125% senior notes due 2021

$

700,000 

 

$

700,000 

 



 

5  1/4% senior notes due 2023

 

400,000 

 

 

400,000 

 



 

5.500% senior notes due 2024

 

500,000 

 

 

500,000 

 



 

4.125% senior notes due 2025

 

350,000 

 

 

 -

 



 

5.000% senior notes due 2026

 

400,000 

 

 

400,000 

 



 

6  3/8% senior notes due 2022

 

 -

 

 

350,000 

 



 

Other obligations

 

58,852 

 

 

36,791 

 



 

Total debt

 

2,408,852 

 

 

2,386,791 

 



 

          Less debt issuance costs

 

26,912 

 

 

29,965 

 



 

Total amounts outstanding

 

2,381,940 

 

 

2,356,826 

 



 

          Less current maturities

 

28,795 

 

 

3,632 

 



 

Long-term debt

$

2,353,145 

 

$

2,353,194 

 



Financing Activity

In April 2015,September 2017, the FASBcompany issued ASU 2015-03, Interest—Imputation$350.0 million of Interest (Subtopic 835-30)—Simplifying4.125% senior notes due 2025 (the "2025 Notes"), the Presentationproceeds of Debt Issuance Costs, which, requiresalong with available cash, were used to fund the September 2017 tender offer to purchase at a redemption price of 103.563% a total of $182.9 million principal amount, plus accrued and unpaid interest to, but not including, the date of repurchase, of the company's 6.375% senior notes due 2022 (the "2022 Notes"), and the October 2017 call and repayment at a redemption price of 103.188% of the $167.1 million remaining outstanding principal amount of the 2022 Notes, plus accrued and unpaid interest to, but not including, the date of repayment. The company recorded expenses related to tender and call premiums, write off of unamortized debt issuance costs, and other expenses of $14.6 million, which are reflected in other expenses in the consolidated statements of operations for the year ended December 31, 2017.

In December 2016, the company issued $400.0 million of 5.000% senior notes due 2026 (the "2026 Notes"), the proceeds of which, along with available cash, were used to be presented asfund the December 2016 tender offer to purchase at a deduction fromredemption price of 103.388% a total of $266.3 million principal amount, plus accrued and unpaid interest to, but not including, the correspondingdate of repurchase, of the company's 6.125% senior notes due 2019 (the "2019 Notes"), and the December 2016 call and repayment at a redemption price of 103.063% of the $133.7 million remaining outstanding principal amount of the 2016 Notes plus accrued and unpaid interest to, but not including, the date of repayment. In addition, the company repaid the remaining $228.1 million of outstanding senior secured term loan debt liability, rather than as a separate asset.with available cash in December 2016, which was set to mature in November 2019.  The company adopted ASU 2015-03 on December 31, 2015,recorded expenses related to tender and applied the new guidance retrospectively to all prior periods presented in the financial statements. As a resultcall premiums, write off of the adoption, $42.3 million of deferredunamortized debt issuance costs, were reclassified from Other Assets to Long Term Debtand other expenses of $16.5 million, which are reflected in ourother expenses in the consolidated statement of operations for the year ended December 31, 2014, consolidated balance sheet.2016.

Financing Activity

        OnIn March 16, 2015, the company called and repaid all $350.0 million of its outstanding 75/8% Senior Notes due 2020 (the "2020 Notes"“2020 Notes”) at a redemption price of 103.813% of the principal amount of the 2020 Notes, plus accrued and unpaid interest to, but not including, the date of redemption. Associated premiums and the write off of deferred financing costs of approximately $16.7 million were recorded in other expense in conjunction with the redemption.

        In September 2014, the company issued $700.0 million of 5.125% Senior Notes due 2021 (the "2021 Senior Notes") and $500.0 million of 5.500% Senior Notes due 2024 (the "2024 Senior Notes"), combined the "Senior Notes". The proceeds from the issuance of the Senior Notes, along with cash on


Table of Contents


STEEL DYNAMICS, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

Note 3. Long-Term Debt (Continued)

hand and borrowings under the company's then existing senior secured credit facility, were used to fund the September 16, 2014, acquisition of Columbus Flat Roll Division.

        In June 2014, holders of $271.8 million principal amount of the company's 5.125% Convertible Senior Notes due June 15, 2014 (the "Convertible Notes"), exercised their option to convert the Convertible Notes into shares of common stock by the close of business on June 12, 2014, the conversion election deadline. The conversion rate provided under the terms of the Convertible Notes was 58.4731 shares of common stock per $1,000 principal amount of Convertible Notes, equivalent to a conversion price of approximately $17.10 per share of common stock, resulting in the company issuing a total of 15,893,457 shares of common stock from treasury shares upon conversion of the Convertible Notes. The remaining $15.7 million of the outstanding Convertible Notes was paid in cash on June 16, 2014.

        In March 2013, the company issued $400.0 million of 51/4% senior notes due 2023 (the "2023 Notes"), the proceeds of which, along with available cash, was used to fund the March 2013 purchase of $301.7 million, plus accrued and unpaid interest to, but not including, the date of repurchase, of the company's 63/4% senior notes due 2015 (the "2015 Notes") pursuant to a tender offer; and the April 2013 repayment of the remaining outstanding 2015 Notes due in the principal amount of $198.3 million plus accrued and unpaid interest to, but not including, the date of repayment. As a result of the tender offer and repurchase of the 2015 Notes, the company recorded expenses related to tendercall premiums, write off of unamortized debt issuance costs, write-off, and tenderother expenses of $2.6$16.7 million, which are reflected in other expensesexpense in the consolidated statement of operations for the year ended December 31, 2013.2015.

Senior Secured Credit Facility, due 2019

The company'scompany’s November 2014 senior secured credit Facility,facility (“Facility”), which provides a $1.2 billion Revolver, matures November 2019. Subject to certain conditions, the company has the opportunity to increase the Revolver size by at least $750.0 million. The Facility is guaranteed by certain of the company'scompany’s subsidiaries; and is secured by substantially all of the company'scompany’s and its wholly-owned subsidiaries'subsidiaries’ receivables and inventories, and by pledges of all shares of the company'scompany’s wholly-owned subsidiaries'subsidiaries’ capital stock.stock or other equity interests, and intercompany debt held by the company as collateral. The Revolver is available to fund working capital, capital expenditures, and other general corporate purposes. The company also issued a $250.0 million Term Loan under the Facility which matures on November 14, 2019. The proceeds from the new Term Loan were used to refinance the Company's then existing $226.9 million term loan facility and for general corporate purposes. Quarterly principal payments under the Term Loan are required to be made in the amount of 1.25% of the original principal amount, with the unpaid principal balance of approximately $190.6 million due on the maturity date. Interest on the Term Loan is based on the Facility's pricing grid (1.90% at December 31, 2015) and is payable quarterly.

The Facility pricing grid is adjusted quarterly, and is based on the company'scompany’s leverage of net debt (as defined in the Facility) to last-twelve-months (LTM) consolidated adjusted EBITDA (earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, amortization, and certain other non-cash transactions)items as allowed in the Facility). The minimum pricing is LIBOR plus 1.00% or Prime, and the maximum pricing is LIBOR plus 2.00% or Prime plus 1.00%.  In addition, the company is subject to an unused commitment fee of between 0.225% and 0.375% (based on leverage of net debt to LTM EBITDA) which is applied to the unused portion of the Revolver each quarter.


Table of Contents


56


STEEL DYNAMICS, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

Note 3. Long-Term Debt (Continued)

The Facility contains financial covenants and other covenants pertaining to the company'scompany’s ability (which may under certain circumstances be limited) to make capital expenditures; incur indebtedness; permit liens on property; enter into transactions with affiliates; make restricted payments or investments; enter into mergers, acquisitions or consolidations; conduct asset sales; pay dividends or distributions, andor enter into other specified transactions and activities. The company'scompany’s ability to borrow funds within the terms of the Revolver is dependent upon its continued compliance with the financial and other covenants. At December 31, 2015,2017, the company had $1.2 billion of availability on the Revolver, $12.8$11.9 million of outstanding letters of credit and other obligations which reduce availability, and there were no borrowings outstanding.outstanding borrowings.

The financial covenants under the company'scompany’s Facility state that it must maintain an interest coverage ratio of not less than 2.50:1.00. The company'scompany’s interest coverage ratio is calculated by dividing its LTM consolidated adjusted EBITDA by its LTM gross interest expense less amortization of financing fees. In addition, a net debt (as defined in the Facility) to LTM consolidated adjusted EBITDA (net debt leverage ratio) of not more than 5.00:1.00 must be maintained. If the net debt leverage ratio exceeds 3.50:1:00 at any time, the company'scompany’s ability to make certain payments as defined in the Facility (which includes cash dividends to stockholders and share purchases, among other things), is limited. At December 31, 2015,2017, the company'scompany’s interest coverage ratio and net debt leverage ratio were 4.76:10.75:1.00 and 2.99:1.35:1.00, respectively. The company was therefore in compliance with these covenants at December 31, 2015,2017, and anticipates remaining in compliance during the next twelve months.

Senior Unsecured Notes



We have five different tranches of senior unsecured notes (Notes) outstanding.  These Notes are in equal right of payment with all existing and future senior unsecured indebtedness and are senior in right of payment to all subordinated indebtedness. These Notes contain provisions that allow the company to redeem the senior notes on or after the dates and at redemption prices (expressed as a percentage of principal amount) listed below. Additionally, these Notes generally allow the company to redeem some or all of the Notes by paying a "make-whole"“make-whole” premium any time prior to the dates listed below. The company may redeem up to 35% of each of the Notes at a redemption price and by the


Table of Contents


STEEL DYNAMICS, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

Note 3. Long-Term Debt (Continued)

dates listed below using the proceeds from the sales of the company'scompany’s common stock. See the key terms of each of the Notes outstanding below.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Issue
 2019 Notes 2021 Notes 2022 Notes 2023 Notes 2024 Notes

 

2021 Notes

 

2023 Notes

 

2024 Notes

 

2025 Notes

 

2026 Notes

Outstanding Balance

 $400.0 million $700.0 million $350.0 million $400.0 million $500.0 million

 

$700.0 million

 

$400.0 million

 

$500.0 million

 

$350.0 million

 

$400.0 million

Stated Interest Rate

 

61/8%

 

5.125%

 

63/8%

 

51/4%

 

5.500%

 

5.125%

 

5  1/4%

 

5.500%

 

4.125%

 

5.000%

Semi-Annual Interest Payment Dates

 

February 15 and August 15

 

April 1 and October 1

 

February 15 and August 15

 

April 15 and October 15

 

April 1 and October 1

 

April 1 and

 

April 15 and

 

April 1 and

 

March 15 and

 

June 15 and

 

October 1

 

October 15

 

October 1

 

September 15

 

December 15

Equity Redemption Option Price & Date

 

N/A—date passed

 

105.125%
(10/1/17)

 

N/A—date passed

 

105.250%
(4/15/16)

 

105.500%
(10/1/17)

 

N/A – date

 

N/A – date

 

N/A – date

 

104.125%

 

105.000%

"Make-whole" Option Date

 

8/15/16

 

10/1/17

 

8/15/17

 

4/15/18

 

10/1/19

 

passed

 

passed

 

passed

 

September 15, 2020

 

December 15, 2019

“Make-Whole” Option Date

 

N/A – date passed

 

April 15, 2018

 

October 1, 2019

 

September 15, 2020

 

December 15, 2021

First Call Price & Date

 

103.063%
(8/15/16)

 

102.563%
(10/1/17)

 

103.188%
(8/15/17)

 

102.625%
(4/15/18)

 

102.750%
(10/1/19)

 

N/A – date

 

102.625%

 

102.750%

 

102.063%

 

102.500%

 

passed

 

April 15, 2018

 

October 1, 2019

 

September 15, 2020

 

December 15, 2021

Second Call Price & Date

 

101.531%
(8/15/17)

 

101.281%
(10/1/18)

 

102.125%
(8/15/18)

 

101.750%
(4/15/19)

 

101.833%
(10/1/20)

 

101.281%

 

101.750%

 

101.833%

 

101.031%

 

101.667%

 

October 1, 2018

 

April 15, 2019

 

October 1, 2020

 

September 15, 2021

 

December 15, 2022

Third Call Price & Date

 

100.000%
(8/15/18)

 

100.000%
(10/1/19)

 

101.063%
(8/15/19)

 

100.875%
(4/15/20)

 

100.917%
(10/1/21)

 

100.000%

 

100.875%

 

100.917%

 

100.000%

 

100.833%

 

October 1, 2019

 

April 15, 2020

 

October 1, 2021

 

September 15, 2022

 

December 15, 2023

Fourth Call Price & Date

 

 

 

100.000%
(8/15/20)

 

100.000%
(4/15/21)

 

100.000%
(10/1/22)

 

-

 

100.000%

 

100.000%

 

-

 

100.000%

 

 

 

April 15, 2021

 

October 1, 2022

 

 

 

December 15, 2024

Maturity Date

 

August 15,
2019

 

October 1,
2021

 

August 15,
2022

 

April 15,
2023

 

October 1,
2024

 

October 1, 2021

 

April 15, 2023

 

October 1, 2024

 

September 15, 2025

 

December 15, 2026

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Other Secured Obligations

Minnesota Economic Development State Loans.Secured Loans.  Mesabi Nugget has loans from various Minnesota state agencies related to the construction and ultimate operation of Mesabi Nugget. These loans require monthly principal and interest payments at a 3.5% interest rate until February 2017, and then changing toat 5.0% through maturity in 2027. Amounts due under these loans were $24.0$20.6 million and $22.3 million at December 31, 2017, and 2016, respectively.

Other Secured Loans.  One of the company’s controlled subsidiaries entered into financing agreements for certain equipment which bear interest at 6.0%, with monthly principal and interest payments required through maturities in 2027 and 2028.  The outstanding principal balance of these agreements was $8.9 million and $9.5 million at December 31, 2017, and 2016, respectively. 

One of the company’s controlled subsidiaries has a secured credit agreement which provides a revolving variable rate credit facility of up to $40.0 million, subject to a borrowing base determined from eligible accounts receivable and inventory, and other cash flow restrictions. Interest, which was 3.9% at December 31, 2017, is payable monthly. Amounts due under this credit facility were $25.7 million at December 31, 2015, and 2014, respectively.2017. There were no amounts due under this credit facility at December 31, 2016. 

57


STEEL DYNAMICS, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

Note 3. Long-Term Debt (Continued)

        Other.Unsecured Loans.  The company has an unsecured electricity transmission facility loan which bears interest at 8.1%, with monthly principal and interest payments required through maturity in 2022. The company has an unused $3.0 million stand-by letter of credit in conjunction with this loan. The outstanding principal balance was $4.9$3.6 million and $5.4$4.2 million as of December 31, 2015,2017, and 2014, respectively. One of the company's controlled subsidiaries entered into a secured credit agreement in 2015 which provides a revolving variable rate credit facility of up to $40.0 million, subject to a borrowing base determined from eligible accounts receivable and inventory. Interest is payable monthly. There were no amounts outstanding under this credit facility as of December 31, 2015. One of the company's controlled subsidiaries entered into financing agreements for certain equipment which bear interest at 6.0%, with monthly principal and interest payments required through maturities in 2027 and 2028. The outstanding principal balance of these agreements was $10.1 and $10.7 million at December 31, 2015, and 2014,2016, respectively.


Table of Contents


STEEL DYNAMICS, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

Note 3. Long-Term Debt (Continued)

Maturities of outstanding debt as of December 31, 2015,2017, are as follows (in thousands):

2016

 $16,680 

2017

  15,796 

2018

  15,601 

2019

  603,291 

2020

  3,491 

Thereafter

  1,973,275 

 $2,628,134 



 

 

 

 

 



2018

 

$

28,795 

 



2019

 

 

3,291 

 



2020

 

 

3,492 

 



2021

 

 

703,708 

 



2022

 

 

3,174 

 



Thereafter

 

 

1,666,392 

 



 

 

$

2,408,852 

 



The company capitalizes interest on all qualifying construction-in-progressconstruction in progress assets. For the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014,2017, 2016, and 2013,2015, total interest costs incurred were $154.4$136.1 million, $139.7$148.5 million, and $132.3$154.4 million, respectively, of which $457,000,$1.7 million, $2.5 million and $4.6 million,$457,000, respectively, were capitalized. Cash paid for interest was $160.2 million, $114.3 million, and $129.5 million for the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014, and 2013, respectively.

Note 4. Income Taxes

The company files a consolidated federal income tax return. Net cash paid (refunded) for taxes was $(9.9) million, $120.5 million and $72.4 million for the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014, and 2013, respectively. The current and deferred federal and state income tax expense (benefit) for the years ended December 31 is as follows (in thousands):

 
 2015 2014 2013 

Current income tax expense

 $6,391 $94,312 $72,599 

Deferred income tax expense (benefit)

  (103,338) (21,159) 26,715 

Total income tax expense (benefit)

 $(96,947)$73,153 $99,314 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

2017

 

2016

 

2015

 



Current income tax expense

$

269,387 

 

$

153,176 

 

$

6,391 

 



Deferred income tax expense (benefit)

 

(139,948)

 

 

50,951 

 

 

(103,338)

 



   Total income tax expense (benefit)

$

129,439 

 

$

204,127 

 

$

(96,947)

 



A reconciliation of the statutory tax rates to the actual effective tax rates for the years ended December 31 are as follows:



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

2017

 

2016

 

2015

 



Statutory federal tax rate

 

35.0 

%

 

 

35.0 

%

 

 

35.0 

%

 



   Impact from Tax Reform

 

(19.3)

 

 

 

 -

 

 

 

 -

 

 



   State income taxes, net of federal benefit

 

1.4 

 

 

 

2.6 

 

 

 

6.3 

 

 



   Domestic manufacturing deduction

 

(2.6)

 

 

 

(2.5)

 

 

 

 -

 

 



   Noncontrolling interests

 

0.3 

 

 

 

1.4 

 

 

 

(2.1)

 

 



   Tax benefit of equity compensation

 

(1.1)

 

 

 

(1.0)

 

 

 

0.4 

 

 



   Other permanent differences

 

0.1 

 

 

 

0.7 

 

 

 

0.4 

 

 



Effective tax rate

 

13.8 

%

 

 

36.2 

%

 

 

40.0 

%

 

On December 22, 2017, the President of the United States signed into law the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 (the “TCJA Act”) which, among other provisions, reduces the corporate income tax rate from 35% to 21%, effective January 1, 2018. The TCJA Act also includes a one-time transition tax related to cumulative foreign earnings, as the United States transitions from a worldwide tax system to a territorial tax system. During the fourth quarter of 2017, the company recorded a $180.6 million net tax benefit to reflect the impacts of the TCJA Act, including a $182.5 million tax benefit to revalue its net deferred tax assets and liabilities as of December 31, 2017, using the newly enacted rate, partially offset by tax expense of $1.9 million related to the transition tax on cumulative foreign earnings. While the company believes the $180.6 million tax benefit is a reasonable estimate of the impact of the TCJA Act, additional guidance and clarifications of the TCJA Act are expected to be provided in the future. Although the company does not anticipate any material adjustments, future tax expense or benefit related to the TCJA Act may need to be recorded as additional guidance and clarifications of the TCJA Act are provided. Once the company finalizes certain tax positions when it files its 2017 US tax return, it will conclude whether any further adjustments are necessary and record the amounts as a component of tax expense (benefit) in the reporting period in which such adjustments are determined, which will be no later than the fourth quarter 2018.

 
 2015 2014 2013 

Statutory federal tax rate

  35.0% 35.0% 35.0%

State income taxes, net of federal benefit

  6.3  4.6  3.8 

Domestic manufacturing deduction

    (4.8) (2.0)

Noncontrolling interests

  (2.1) 13.9  3.4 

Federal research and development tax credits

    (1.5) (2.5)

Other permanent differences

  0.8  (2.8) 0.1 

Effective tax rate

  40.0% 44.4% 37.8%

Table of Contents58



STEEL DYNAMICS, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

Note 4. Income Taxes (Continued)

Significant components of the company'scompany’s deferred tax assets and liabilities at December 31 are as follows (in thousands):

 
 2015 2014 

Deferred tax assets

       

Accrued expenses and allowances

 $21,205 $22,780 

Inventories

  21,559  20,546 

Net operating loss carryforwards

  61,148  33,347 

Intangible Assets

  28,553   

Other

  8,684  5,571 

Subtotal

  141,149  82,244 

Less: valuation allowance

  (26,835) (21,586)

Total net deferred tax assets

  114,314  60,658 

Deferred tax liabilities

       

Property, plant and equipment

  (511,596) (449,939)

Intangible assets

    (108,840)

Other

  (3,488) (8,361)

Total deferred tax liabilities

  (515,084) (567,140)

Net deferred tax liability

 $(400,770)$(506,482)



 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

2017

 

2016

 



Deferred tax assets

 

 

 

 

 

 



   Accrued expenses and allowances

$

16,322 

 

$

24,986 

 



   Inventories

 

4,109 

 

 

11,805 

 



   Net operating loss carryforwards

 

33,693 

 

 

48,920 

 



   Intangible assets

 

 -

 

 

14,779 

 



   Other

 

8,074 

 

 

8,491 

 



 

 

62,198 

 

 

108,981 

 



   Less: valuation allowance

 

(20,714)

 

 

(33,427)

 



Total net deferred tax assets

 

41,484 

 

 

75,554 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 



Deferred tax liabilities

 

 

 

 

 

 



   Property, plant and equipment

 

(344,511)

 

 

(519,977)

 



   Intangible assets

 

(1,292)

 

 

 -

 



   Other

 

(1,630)

 

 

(3,952)

 



Total deferred tax liabilities

 

(347,433)

 

 

(523,929)

 



       Net deferred tax liability

$

(305,949)

 

$

(448,375)

 

The change in intangible assets to a $28.6 million deferred tax asset at December 31, 2015, from a $108.8 million deferred tax liability at December 31, 2014, is due primarily to the $409.8 million impairment of OmniSource goodwill and trade name assets in 2015, which is not currently deductible.

Certain wholly-owned and controlled subsidiaries of the company file separate federal and state income tax returns. These subsidiaries have generated federal net operating loss carryforwards of $69.7$93.2 million which expire in 2032 to 2035,2037, and state net operating loss carryforwards which principally expire in the years 20242025 to 2035.2037. Management has considered the scheduled reversal of the deferred tax liabilities, historical taxable losses, projected taxable income and tax planning strategies in determining that it is more likely than not that some of the deferred tax assets relating to the tax loss carryforwards of the subsidiaries will not be realized. Based on these evaluations, valuation allowances of $26.8$20.7 million and $21.6$33.4 million have been recorded as of December 31, 2015,2017, and 2014,2016, respectively. The $5.2$12.7 million increasedecrease in valuation allowance in the year ended December 31, 2015,2017, primarily relates to the realizabilitychange in future value due to the TCJA Act and the release of a valuation allowance in the amount of $4.3 million for certain state tax net operating loss carryforwards.

        In November 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-17, Income Taxes (Topic 740), which requires an entity to classify all deferred tax assets and liabilities as noncurrent on the balance sheet instead of separating into current and noncurrent amounts. The company adopted ASU 2015-17 on December 31, 2015, and applied the new guidance retrospectively to all prior periods presented in the financial statements. As a result of the adoption, $35.5 million was reclassified from current deferred income tax asset to noncurrent deferred income tax liability in our December 31, 2014, consolidated balance sheet.


Table of Contents


STEEL DYNAMICS, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

Note 4. Income Taxes (Continued)

A reconciliation of the beginning and ending amount of unrecognized tax benefits is as follows (in thousands):

 
 2015 2014 2013 

Balance at January 1

 $17,338 $26,564 $22,245 

Increases related to current year tax positions

    1,050  1,050 

Increases related to prior year tax positions

  81  653  3,760 

Decreases related to prior year tax positions

  (719) (2,298) (491)

Settlements with taxing authorities

  (70) (8,631)  

Lapses in statute of limitations

  (639)    

Balance at December 31

 $15,991 $17,338 $26,564 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

2017

 

2016

 

2015

 



Balance at January 1

$

19,107 

 

$

15,991 

 

$

17,338 

 



   Increases related to current year tax positions

 

300 

 

 

300 

 

 

 -

 



   Increases related to prior year tax positions

 

271 

 

 

5,452 

 

 

81 

 



   Decreases related to prior year tax positions

 

(863)

 

 

(535)

 

 

(719)

 



   Settlements with taxing authorities

 

(2,066)

 

 

(2,101)

 

 

(70)

 



   Lapses in statute of limitations

 

 -

 

 

 -

 

 

(639)

 



Balance at December 31

$

16,749 

 

$

19,107 

 

$

15,991 

 



Included in the balance of unrecognized tax benefits at December 31, 2015,2017, are potential benefits of $11.7$12.5 million that, if recognized, would affect the effective tax rate. The company recognizes interest and penalties related to its tax contingencies on a net-of-tax basis in income tax expense. During the year ended December 31, 2015,2017, the company recognized benefitsexpense from the reductionincrease of interest expense of $100,000,$85,000, net of tax.  In addition to the unrecognized tax benefits in the table above, the company had $5.2$4.8 million accrued for the payment of interest and penalties at December 31, 2015.2017.



59


STEEL DYNAMICS, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

Note 4. Income Taxes (Continued)

The company files income tax returns in the U.S.United States federal jurisdiction as well as income tax returns in various state jurisdictions. The IRScompany is currently examiningsubject to examination and proposed adjustments by the company's federal income tax returnsIRS for the yearscalendar year 2010 and 2011.thereafter. At this time the company does not believe there will be any significant examination adjustments that would result in a material change to the company'scompany’s financial position, results of operations or cash flows. It is reasonably possible that the amount of unrecognized tax benefits could change in the next twelve months as a result of these federal income tax audits, and other state income tax audits. Based on the current audits in process, the payment of taxes as a result of audit settlements could be in an amount from zero to $7.1$3.3 million by the end of 2016.2018. With the exception of the 2010 and 2011 federal return which is currently under examination,returns, the company is no longer subject to federal, state and local income tax examinations by tax authorities for years ended before 2011.2012.

Note 5. Shareholders'Shareholders’ Equity

Cash Dividends

The company declared cash dividends of $148.2 million, or $0.62 per common share, during 2017; $136.5 million, or $0.56 per common share, during 2016; and $133.2 million, or $0.55 per common share, during 2015; $108.6 million, or $0.46 per common share, during 2014; and $97.4 million, or $0.44 per common share, during 2013.2015. The company paid cash dividends of $145.6 million, $135.8 million and $127.6 million $105.4 millionduring 2017, 2016, and $94.8 million during 2015, 2014, and 2013, respectively.

Treasury Stock

        The company'sDuring 2016, the company’s board of directors has authorized a share repurchase program of up to $450.0 million of the company’s common stock in open market or private transactions, cancelling the previously authorized program. The share repurchase program does not require the company to repurchaseacquire any specific number of shares ofand may be modified, suspended, extended or terminated by the company's common stock through open market trades.company.  The company did not repurchase anyrepurchased 7.4 million shares for $252.2 million during the three-year period ended2017, and 732,000 shares for $25.0 million during 2016.  At December 31, 2015. As of December 31, 2015,2017, the company had remaining authorization to repurchase approximately 3.6$172.7 million of additional shares. The share repurchase program does not have an expiration date.


Table of Contents


STEEL DYNAMICS, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

Note 6. Equity-basedEquity‑Based Incentive Plans

2015 Equity Incentive Plan (2015 Plan)



The 2015 Plan wasis designed to attract, motivate and retain qualified persons that are able to make important contributions to the company'scompany’s success. To accomplish these objectives, the 2015 Plan provides for awards of equity-basedequity‑based incentives through granting of stock options, restricted stock units (RSUs), deferred stock units (DSUs), restricted stock awards, stock options, unrestricted stock awards, stock appreciation rights (SARs), and performance awards, such as long-term incentive compensation program (LTIP). The company'scompany’s stockholders approved the 2015 Plan in May 2015, and 12.5 million shares of common stock were reserved for issuance upon exercise of options or other equity grants through December 31, 2025. The 2015 Plan replaced the 2006 Amended and Restated Equity Incentive Plan (Expired 2006 Plan) which was set to expire on December 31, 2015. The 2015 Plan remains substantially the same as the Expired 2006 Plan. No further awards can be made under the Expired 2006 Plan and any shares that do not vest or are forfeited will simply be canceled. The 2015 Plan uses a fungible share concept under which any awards that are not a full-value award, such as stock options and stock appreciation rights,SARs, will be counted against the share limit as one share for each share of common stock, and awards that are full-value awards, such as RSUs, DSUs, restricted and unrestricted stock awards, and performance awards, will be counted against the share limit as 2.09 shares for each share of common stock. At December 31, 2015,2017, there were 9.15.3 million shares in the fungible share reserve still available for issuance.

Substantially all of the company'scompany’s employees receive RSUs, which are granted annually in November at no cost to employees, vest 100% over the shorter of two years from grant date or upon the recipient reaching retirement eligible age (591/2(59½ years), and arethe stock is issued to employees upon vesting. Prior to 2012, substantially all of the company's employees were granted stock options at an exercise price of 100% of the fair market value of the company's common stock on the date of grant, which vested 100% six months after the date of grant, with a maximum term of five years. The company satisfies RSUs and stock options with newly issued shares, and satisfies restricted stock awards, deferred stock units,DSUs, and performance awards with treasury shares. In addition to the RSUs stock options and LTIP awards granted during the three year period ended December 31, 2015,2017, presented below, the company awarded 51,000, 54,00034,000,  60,000 and 53,00051,000 DSUs in 2017, 2016 and 2015, 2014respectively; and 2013,200,000 and 86,000 SARs in 2017 and 2016, respectively.


Table of Contents60



STEEL DYNAMICS, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

Note 6. Equity-basedEquity‑Based Incentive Plans (Continued)



A summary of the company'scompany’s RSU activity and outstanding RSUs as of December 31, 2015,2017, are presented below (dollars in thousands except grant date fair value):

 
 Number of
RSUs
 Weighted
Average
Grant Date
Fair Value
 Aggregate
Intrinsic
Value
 Unrecognized
Compensation
 

Outstanding RSUs as of January 1, 2013

  1,269,307 $11.87 $17,428 $12,318 

Granted

  1,293,140 $18.16       

Vested

  (170,398)$17.74       

Forfeited

  (112,406)$12.48       

As of December 31, 2013

  2,279,643 $14.97 $44,544 $22,197 

Granted

  1,121,416 $21.82       

Vested

  (1,245,489)$13.20       

Forfeited

  (144,344)$15.51       

As of December 31, 2014

  2,011,226 $19.85 $39,702 $25,171 

Granted

  1,589,309 $16.70       

Vested

  (1,197,403)$18.13       

Forfeited

  (124,428)$19.89       

As of December 31, 2015 (nonvested)

  2,278,704 $18.55 $40,720 $27,615 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

Weighted

 

Aggregate

 

 

 



Number

 

Average Grant

 

Intrinsic

 

Unrecognized



of RSUs

 

Date Fair Value

 

Value

 

Compensation

Outstanding RSUs as of January 1, 2015

2,011,226 

 

 

$19.85

 

$

39,702 

 

$

25,171 

Granted

1,589,309 

 

 

$16.70

 

 

 

 

 

 

Vested

(1,197,403)

 

 

$18.13

 

 

 

 

 

 

Forfeited

(124,428)

 

 

$19.89

 

 

 

 

 

 

As of December 31, 2015

2,278,704 

 

 

$18.55

 

$

40,720 

 

$

27,615 

Granted

852,063 

 

 

$32.40

 

 

 

 

 

 

Vested

(962,828)

 

 

$22.76

 

 

 

 

 

 

Forfeited

(139,922)

 

 

$18.50

 

 

 

 

 

 

As of December 31, 2016

2,028,017 

 

 

$22.38

 

$

72,157 

 

$

29,086 

Granted

828,955 

 

 

$36.29

 

 

 

 

 

 

Vested

(1,364,593)

 

 

$18.50

 

 

 

 

 

 

Forfeited

(78,737)

 

 

$23.52

 

 

 

 

 

 

As of December 31, 2017 (nonvested)

1,413,642 

 

 

$34.22

 

$

60,970 

 

$

32,017 



The weighted average remaining life before vesting of the outstanding RSUs as of December 31, 2015,2017, is 1.51.37 years. The fair value of RSUs vesting during 2017, 2016, and 2015 2014, and 2013 was $21.4$58.8 million, $24.6$34.3 million, and $3.3$21.4 million, respectively, and was net-share settled such that the company withheld shares with value equivalent to the employees'employees’ minimum statutory obligation for the applicable income and other employment taxes, and remitted the cash to the appropriate taxing authorities. The total shares withheld in 2015, 2014,2017, 2016, and 20132015 were approximately 427,000, 444,000,457,000,  338,000, and 63,000427,000 shares, respectively, and were based on the value of the RSUs on their vesting dates as determined by the company'scompany’s closing stock price.


Table of Contents


STEEL DYNAMICS, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

Note 6. Equity-based Incentive Plans (Continued)

A summary

Prior to 2012, substantially all of the company'scompany’s employees were granted stock option activity and certain information concerningoptions at an exercise price of 100% of the company's outstanding options asfair market value of December 31, 2015, are presented below.the company’s common stock on the date of grant, which vested 100% six months after the date of grant, with a maximum term of five years. There werehave been no stock options granted in 2013, 2014,since 2011, thus the five year maximum term of the 2011 grant has expired, no stock options remain outstanding or 2015.

 
 Number of
Options
 Weighted
Average
Exercise Price
 Weighted
Average
Grant Date
Fair Value
 

Outstanding options as of January 1, 2013

  7,073,709 $14.56 $5.30 

Exercised

  (3,134,953)$11.02 $4.19 

Forfeited

  (681,586)$29.52 $9.01 

As of December 31, 2013

  3,257,170 $14.84 $5.58 

Exercised

  (1,773,872)$15.01 $5.57 

Forfeited

  (84,783)$14.98 $5.45 

As of December 31, 2014

  1,398,515 $14.62 $5.61 

Exercised

  (753,159)$14.75 $5.75 

Forfeited

  (49,411)$15.02 $5.87 

As of December 31, 2015

  595,945 $14.43 $5.41 


Range of Exercise Price
 Exercisable
Outstanding
Options
 Weighted Average
Remaining
Contractual
Life (Years)
 Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price of
Exercisable
Outstanding
Options
 

$10 to $15

  333,954  0.89 $12.54 

$15 to $20

  261,991  0.39 $16.85 

  595,945       

        The aggregate intrinsic value of options exercised was $4.0 million, $9.3 million, and $18.7 million for the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014, and 2013, respectively. The aggregate intrinsic value of options which were outstanding and exercisable, as of December 31, 2015, was $2.0 million, and there is no unrecognized stock option compensation expense at December 31, 2015.2016 or 2017. A summary of the company’s stock option activity and certain information concerning the company’s outstanding options are presented below.



The company maintains an LTIP performance-based program directed toward key senior executives of the company, as determined at the discretion of the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors. Awards are in shares of the company'scompany’s common stock using the stock price on the first day of the performance period to convert each key senior executive's pre-determinedexecutive’s predetermined multiple of annual base salary. The performance period is generally three years; however, certain transition awards were issued in 2013 and 2017 with shorter performance periods. Performance is measured in terms of equal portions of revenuefour growth operating margin, return on invested capital and return on equity of the companyprofitability measures, as compared to the same measures, similarly treated, of a pre-established group of steel sector


Table of Contents


STEEL DYNAMICS, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

Note 6. Equity-based Incentive Plans (Continued)

competitors. Awards earned can range from zero to 100% of the shares awarded. Once earned on the basis of performance, one-third of the shares vest immediately, and the remaining shares vest equallyin equal annual installments over an additional two-year service-based vesting period requirement. The Compensation Committee granted the following three-year performance period awards, and one-two-year and two-yearone-year performance period transition awards, which have been earned and have or will be issued over the vesting period as follows:

 
 Maximum
Shares That
Could Be
Issued
 Award
Earned
 Award Issued/Issuable

2013 LTIP Award:

           

One-year performance period transition award

  173,319  164,653  54,885 March 2014

        54,884 March 2015

        54,884 March 2016

Two-year performance period transition award

  
173,319
  
159,454
  
53,152
 

March 2015

        53,151 March 2016

        53,151 March 2017

Three-year performance period award

  
173,319
  
149,056
  
49,686
 

March 2016

        49,686 March 2017

        49,684 March 2018

2014 LTIP Award:

  
 
  
 
  
 
 

 

Three-year performance period award

  269,531   *  * 

2015 LTIP Award:

  
 
  
 
  
 
 

 

Three-year performance period award

  301,759   *  * 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

Maximum

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

Shares That

 

Award

 

 

 

 

 



 

Could Be Issued

 

Earned

 

Award Issued/Issuable

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



2013 LTIP Award:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



Two-year performance period transition award

173,319 

 

159,457 

 

53,154 

 

March 2015

 



 

 

 

 

 

66,252 

 

March 2016

 



 

 

 

 

 

40,051 

 

March 2017

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



Three-year performance period award

173,319 

 

149,060 

 

74,179 

 

March 2016

 



 

 

 

 

 

37,441 

 

March 2017

 



 

 

 

 

 

37,440 

 

March 2018

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



2014 LTIP Award:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



Three-year performance period award

204,741 

 

204,741 

 

68,249 

 

March 2017

 



 

 

 

 

 

68,247 

 

March 2018

 



 

 

 

 

 

68,245 

 

March 2019

 



2015 LTIP Award:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



Three-year performance period award

236,434 

 

236,434 

 

78,813 

 

March 2018

 



 

 

 

 

 

78,812 

 

March 2019

 



 

 

 

 

 

78,809 

 

March 2020

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



2016 LTIP Award:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



Three-year performance period award

324,469 

 

*

 

*

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



2017 LTIP Award:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



Three-year performance period award

182,274 

 

*

 

*

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



Two-year performance period transition award

16,779 

 

*

 

*

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



One-year performance period transition award

28,379 

 

25,541 

 

8,514 

 

March 2018

 



 

 

 

 

 

8,514 

 

March 2019

 



 

 

 

 

 

8,513 

 

March 2020

 


*

Not yet earned as performance period not complete.

62


STEEL DYNAMICS, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

Note 6. Equity‑Based Incentive Plans (Continued)

2013 Executive Incentive Compensation Plan (Executive Plan)



Pursuant to the company'scompany’s existing Executive Plan, certain officers and other senior management members of the company are eligible to receive cash bonuses based on predetermined formulas. In the event the cash portion of the bonus exceeds the predetermined maximum cash payout, the excess bonus up to a fixed percentage of base salary is distributed as common stockin shares of the company,company’s stock, of which one-third of the shares vest immediately and the remaining shares vest equallyin equal annual installments over an additional two-year service-based vesting period requirement. The company'scompany’s stockholders approved the Executive Plan in May 2013, and 2.5 million shares of company stock were reserved for issuance through February 28, 2018. At December 31, 2015, 2.32017, 2.1 million shares under the Executive Plan remained available for issuance. Pursuant to the Executive Plan, no shares were awarded for the award year 2015, 221,900117,000 shares were awarded with a market value of $3.8$5.3 million for the 2017 award year, 2014, and 9,500117,000 shares were awarded with a market value of $157,000$4.0 million for the 2016 award year, 2013.


Table of Contentsand no shares were awarded for the 2015 award year.


STEEL DYNAMICS, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

Note 6. Equity-based Incentive Plans (Continued)

2014 Employee Stock Purchase Plan

The 2014 Employee Stock Purchase Plan allows eligible employees, at their election, to purchase shares of the company'scompany’s stock on the open market at fair market value each month with a designated broker through payroll deductions. The maximum allowable payroll deduction for the plan, excluding company matching contributions, is $10,400 in any calendar year. The company provides matching contributions of 10% of employees'employees’ payroll deductions. The company'scompany’s total expense for the plan was $468,000, $376,000,$558,000,  $514,000, and $354,000$468,000 for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016, and 2015, 2014, and 2013, respectively.

Note 7.  Derivative Financial Instruments



The company is exposed to certain risks relating to its ongoing business operations. The company may utilizeutilizes derivative instruments to mitigate interest rate andcommodity margin risk, occasionally to mitigate foreign currency exchange rate risk, and have in the past to mitigate interest rate fluctuation risk. The company routinely enters into forward exchange traded futures and option contracts to manage the price risk associated with nonferrous metals inventory, as well as purchases and sales of nonferrous metals (specifically(primarily aluminum copper, nickel and silver)copper).  The company offsets fair value amounts recognized for derivative instruments executed with the same counterparty under master netting agreements. The company designates certain of its nonferrous metals forward exchange futures contracts as fair value hedges of inventory and firm sales commitments.

Commodity futures contracts.Futures Contracts.  If the company is "long"“long” on futures contracts, it means the company has more futures contracts purchased than futures contracts sold for the underlying commodity. If the company is "short"“short” on a futures contract, it means the company has more futures contracts sold than futures contracts purchased for the underlying commodity. The following summarizes the company's commoditycompany’s futures contract commitments as of December 31, 20152017 (MT represents metric tons and Lbs represents pounds)tons):

Commodity
Long/ShortTotal

Aluminum

Long

2,475

MT

Aluminum

Short

2,825

MT

Copper

Commodity Futures

Long

Long/Short

8,985

Total

MT

Copper

Aluminum

Short

Long

14,1441,550 

MT

MT

Silver

Aluminum

Short

Short

3431,775 

MT

Lbs

Copper

Long

5,555 

MT

Copper

Short

26,091 

MT


Table of Contents


STEEL DYNAMICS, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

Note 7. Derivative Financial Instruments (Continued)

The following summarizes the location and amounts of the fair values reported on the company'scompany’s balance sheets and gains or losses related to derivatives included in the company'scompany’s consolidated statements of operations as of and for the years ended December 31 (in thousands):

 
 Asset Derivatives Liability Derivatives 
 
  
 Fair Value Fair Value 
 
 Balance sheet
location
 December 31,
2015
 December 31,
2014
 December 31,
2015
 December 31,
2014
 

Derivative instruments designated as fair value hedges—

               

Commodity futures

 Other current assets $857 $3,180 $2,860 $913 

Derivative instruments not designated as hedges—

 

 

  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
 

Commodity futures

 Other current assets  908  2,132  1,065  626 

Total derivative instruments

   $1,765 $5,312 $3,925 $1,539 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

Asset Derivatives

 

Liability Derivatives

 

 



Balance sheet

 

Fair Value

 

Fair Value

 

 



 location

 

December 31, 2017

 

December 31, 2016

 

December 31, 2017

 

December 31, 2016

 

 

Derivative instruments designated

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

as fair value hedges -

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

   Commodity futures

Other current assets

 

$

1,211 

 

$

2,910 

 

$

5,364 

 

$

1,300 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Derivative instruments not designated

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

as hedges -

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

   Commodity futures

Other current assets

 

 

1,579 

 

 

1,150 

 

 

5,142 

 

 

783 

 

 

Total derivative instruments

 

 

$

2,790 

 

$

4,060 

 

$

10,506 

 

$

2,083 

 

 



The fair value of the above derivative instruments along with required margin deposit amounts with the same counterparty under master netting arrangements, which total $3.4agreements totaled $5.6 million and $7.6$3.2 million at December 31, 2015,2017, and 2014,2016, respectively, and are reflected in other current assets in the consolidated balance sheet.sheets.

 
 Location of
gain (loss)
recognized in
income on
derivatives
 Amount of
gain (loss)
recognized in
income on
derivatives
for the year
ended
December 31,
2015
 Hedged items in
fair value hedge
relationships
 Location of gain
recognized in income
on related hedged item
 Amount of
gain recognized
in income on
related hedged
items for the
year ended
December 31,
2015
 

Derivatives in fair value hedging relationships—

             

Commodity futures

 Costs of goods sold $(4,254)Firm commitments Costs of goods sold $2,084 

      Inventory Costs of goods sold  1,269 

          $3,353 

Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments—

             

Commodity futures

 Costs of goods sold $16,261        

Table of Contents63



STEEL DYNAMICS, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

Note 7.  Derivative Financial Instruments (Continued)


 
 Location of gain
recognized in
income on
derivatives
 Amount of
gain
recognized in
income on
derivatives
for the year
ended
December 31,
2014
 Hedged items in
fair value hedge
relationships
 Location of gain (loss)
recognized in income
on related hedged item
 Amount of
gain (loss)
recognized in
income on
related hedged
items for the
year ended
December 31,
2014
 

Derivatives in fair value hedging relationships—

             

Commodity futures

 Costs of goods sold $2,778 Firm commitments Costs of goods sold $1,488 

      Inventory Costs of goods sold  (3,411)

          $(1,923)

Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments—

             

Commodity futures

 Costs of goods sold $14,988        



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

Amount of

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

Location of gain

 

 

gain (loss)

 

 

 

Location of gain

 

 

Amount of gain



 

(loss) recognized

 

 

recognized in

 

Hedged items in

 

(loss) recognized

 

 

 (loss) recognized in



 

in income on

 

 

income on

 

fair value hedge

 

in income on

 

 

income on related



 

derivatives

 

 

 derivatives

 

relationships

 

related hedged items

 

 

hedged items

For the Year Ended

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

December 31, 2017

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Derivatives in fair value

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

hedging relationships -

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Commodity futures

 

Costs of goods sold

 

$

5,763 

 

Firm commitments

 

Costs of goods sold

 

$

1,814 



 

 

 

 

 

 

Inventory

 

Costs of goods sold

 

 

3,008 

Derivatives not designated

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

4,822 

as hedging instruments -

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Commodity futures

 

Costs of goods sold

 

$

(18,784)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 
 Location of gain
recognized in
income on
derivatives
 Amount of
gain
recognized in
income on
derivatives
for the year
ended
December 31,
2013
 Hedged items in
fair value hedge
relationships
 Location of gain (loss)
recognized in income
on related hedged item
 Amount of
gain (loss)
recognized in
income on
related hedged
items for the
year ended
December 31,
2013
 

Derivatives in fair value hedging relationships—

             

Commodity futures

 Costs of goods sold $7,509 Firm commitments Costs of goods sold $120 

      Inventory Costs of goods sold  (7,437)

          $(7,317)

Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments—

             

Commodity futures

 Costs of goods sold $2,097        



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

For the Year Ended

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

December 31, 2016

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Derivatives in fair value

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

hedging relationships -

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Commodity futures

 

Costs of goods sold

 

$

3,596 

 

Firm commitments

 

Costs of goods sold

 

$

(3,901)



 

 

 

 

 

 

Inventory

 

Costs of goods sold

 

 

(538)

Derivatives not designated

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

(4,439)

as hedging instruments -

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Commodity futures

 

Costs of goods sold

 

$

(8,450)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 





 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

For the Year Ended

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

December 31, 2015

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Derivatives in fair value

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

hedging relationships -

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Commodity futures

 

Costs of goods sold

 

$

(4,254)

 

Firm commitments

 

Costs of goods sold

 

$

2,084 



 

 

 

 

 

 

Inventory

 

Costs of goods sold

 

 

1,269 

Derivatives not designated

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

3,353 

as hedging instruments -

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Commodity futures

 

Costs of goods sold

 

$

16,261 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Derivatives accounted for as fair value hedges had ineffectiveness resulting in losses of $3,000 and $191,000, and gains of $90,000 and $206,000, and a loss of $206,000 for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016, and 2015, 2014, and 2013, respectively. A lossLosses excluded from hedge effectiveness testing of $938,000,  $652,000, and $991,000 increased costs of goods sold, and gains excluded from hedge effectiveness testing of $649,000 and $398,000 reduced costscost of goods sold for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016, and 2015, 2014, and 2013, respectively.

64


STEEL DYNAMICS, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

Note 8.  Fair Value Measurements

        FASB accountingAccounting standards provide a comprehensive framework for measuring fair value and sets forth a definition of fair value and establishes a hierarchy prioritizing the inputs to valuation techniques, giving the highest priority to quoted prices in active markets for identical assets and liabilities and the lowest priority to unobservable value inputs.  Levels within the hierarchy are defined as follows:


Table of Contents


STEEL DYNAMICS, INC.

·

Level 1—Unadjusted quoted prices for identical assets and liabilities in active markets;

·

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

Note 8. Fair Value Measurements (Continued)

    Level 2—Quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets (other than those included in Level 1) which are observable for

           the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly; and

·

Level 3—Valuations derived from valuation techniques in which one or more significant inputs or significant value drivers are

           unobservable.



The following table sets forth financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis in the consolidated balance sheet and the respective levels to which the fair value measurements are classified within the fair value hierarchy as of December 31 (in thousands):

 
 Total Quoted Prices
in Active
Markets for
Identical Assets
(Level 1)
 Significant
Other
Observable
Inputs
(Level 2)
 Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
(Level 3)
 

2015

             

Commodity futures—financial assets

 $1,765 $ $1,765 $ 

Commodity futures—financial liabilities

  3,925    3,925   

2014

  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
 

Commodity futures—financial assets

 $5,312 $ $5,312 $ 

Commodity futures—financial liabilities

  1,539    1,539   



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

Quoted Prices

 

Significant

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

in Active

 

Other

 

Significant

 

 



 

 

 

Markets for

 

Observable

 

Unobservable

 

 



 

 

 

Identical Assets

 

Inputs

 

Inputs

 

 



Total

 

(Level 1)

 

(Level 2)

 

(Level 3)

 

 

December 31, 2017

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Commodity futures – financial assets

$

2,790 

 

$

 -

 

$

2,790 

 

$

 -

 

 

Commodity futures – financial liabilities

 

10,506 

 

 

 -

 

 

10,506 

 

 

 -

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

December 31, 2016

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Commodity futures – financial assets

$

4,060 

 

$

 -

 

$

4,060 

 

$

 -

 

 

Commodity futures – financial liabilities

 

2,083 

 

 

 -

 

 

2,083 

 

 

 -

 

 



The carrying amounts of financial instruments including cash and equivalents approximate fair value. The fair values of commodity futures contracts are estimated by the use of quoted market prices, estimates obtained from brokers, and other appropriate valuation techniques based on references available. The fair value of long-term debt, including current maturities, as determined by quoted market prices (Level 2), was approximately $2.7$2.5 billion for December 31, 2017 and $3.1 billion2016 (with a corresponding carrying amount in the consolidated balance sheet of $2.6$2.4 billion and $3.0 billion) at December 31, 2015,2017 and 2014, respectively.2016). 

        Refer to Note 1 for discussions regarding goodwill, indefinite-lived intangible assets, long-lived assets, and investments accounted for under the equity method, which as a result of impairments, were measured at fair value in 2015.

Note 9.  Commitments and Contingencies

The company has entered into certain commitments with suppliers which are of a customary nature. Commitments have been entered into relating to future expected requirements for such commodities as electricity, natural gas and its transportation services, fuel, air products, zinc and zinc.electrodes. Certain commitments contain provisions which require that the company "take“take or pay"pay” for specified quantities at fixed prices without regard to actual usage for periods of up to 24 months5 years for physical commodity requirements for up to 4 years forand commodity transportation requirements, and for up to 1311 years for air products. The company utilized such "take“take or pay"pay” requirements during the past three years under these contracts, except for certain air products at our Minnesota ironmaking operations which were idled inhave been idle since May 2015. The company believes that production requirements will be such that consumption of the products or services purchased under these commitments will occur in the normal


Table of Contents


STEEL DYNAMICS, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

Note 9. Commitments and Contingencies (Continued)

production process, other than certain air products related to Minnesota ironmaking operations during the idle period.

The company'scompany’s commitments for these agreements with "take“take or pay"pay” or other similar commitment provisions for the years ending December 31 are as follows (in thousands):



 

 

 

 

 



2018

 

$

312,736 

 



2019

 

 

116,779 

 



2020

 

 

104,300 

 



2021

 

 

90,894 

 



2022

 

 

83,696 

 



Thereafter

 

 

75,337 

 



 

 

$

783,742 

 

65


2016

 $224,850 

2017

  32,120 

2018

  18,636 

2019

  20,059 

2020

  17,099 

Thereafter

  66,600 

 $379,364 

STEEL DYNAMICS, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

Note 9.  Commitments and Contingencies (Continued)

At December 31, 2015,2017, the company has outstanding commitments of $69.6$74.7 million related to ongoing construction of property, plant, and equipment related primarily to steel operations. The company'scompany’s commitments for operating leases are discussed in Note 12.

The company is involved, along with two other remaining steel manufacturing company defendants, in a class action antitrust suit in federal court in Chicago, Illinois, originally against eight companies. The Complaint alleges a conspiracy on the part of the original defendants to fix, raise, maintain and stabilize the price at which steel products were sold in the United States during a specified period between 2005 and 2007, by artificially restricting the supply of such steel products. All but one of the Complaints were brought on behalf of a purported class consisting of all direct purchasers of steel products. The other Complaint was brought on behalf of a purported class consisting of all indirect purchasers of steel products within the same time period. In addition, another similar complaint was filed in December 2010 purporting to be on behalf of indirect purchasers of steel products in Tennessee. All Complaints have been consolidated in the Chicago action and seek treble damages and costs, including reasonable attorney fees, pre- and post-judgment interest and injunctive relief. Following an extensive period of discovery and related motions concerning class certification matters, the Court, on September 9, 2015, certified a class, limited, however, to the issue of the alleged conspiracy alone, and denied class certification on the issue of antitrust impact and damages. As a result, some additional discovery is ongoing. The company has also filed a motion for summary judgment, as has co-defendant SSAB, and this matter is currently pending.

        Due, however, to the uncertain nature of litigation, the company cannot presently determine the ultimate outcome of this litigation. Based on the information available at this time, the company has determined that there is not presently a "reasonable possibility" (as that term is defined in ASC 450-20-20), that the outcome of these legal proceedings would have a material impact on the Company's financial condition, results of operations, or liquidity. Although not presently necessary or appropriate to make a dollar estimate of exposure to loss, if any, in connection with the above matter, the company may in the future determine that a loss accrual is necessary. Although the company may make loss accruals, if and as warranted, any amounts that it may accrue from time to time could vary significantly from the amounts it actually pays, due to inherent uncertainties and the inherent shortcomings of the estimation process, the uncertainties involved in litigation and other factors. Additionally, an adverse result could have a material effect on the company's financial condition, results of operations and liquidity.


Table of Contents


STEEL DYNAMICS, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

Note 9. Commitments and Contingencies (Continued)

        The company is also involved in various routine litigation matters, including administrative proceedings, regulatory proceedings, governmental investigations, environmental matters, and commercial and construction contract disputes, none of which are expected to have a material impact on the company'scompany’s financial condition, results of operations, or liquidity.

Note 10. Transactions with Affiliated Companies

The company sells flat roll products to and occasionally purchases ferrous materials from Heidtman. The president and chief executive officer of Heidtman iswas a member of the company'scompany’s board of directors and a stockholder of the company.through May 2017. Transactions with Heidtman for the years ended December 31, are as follows (in thousands):

 
 2015 2014 2013 

Sales

 $162,742 $234,608 $236,075 

Percentage of consolidated net sales

  2% 3% 3%

Accounts receivable

  30,627  35,447  51,760 

Purchases

  11,429  7,639  5,562 

Accounts payable

  431  236  391 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

2017

 

2016

 

2015

 



Sales

$

150,981 

 

$

142,624 

 

$

162,742 

 



    Percentage of consolidated net sales

 

2% 

 

 

2% 

 

 

2% 

 



Accounts receivable

 

19,354 

 

 

20,737 

 

 

30,627 

 



Purchases

 

10,684 

 

 

9,017 

 

 

11,429 

 



Accounts payable

 

663 

 

 

494 

 

 

431 

 



The company also purchases and sells recycled and scrap metal with other smaller affiliated companies. These transactions are as follows (in thousands):



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

2017

 

2016

 

2015

 



Sales

$

23,603 

 

$

27,305 

 

$

24,436 

 



Accounts receivable

 

3,068 

 

 

5,483 

 

 

3,645 

 



Purchases

 

219,975 

 

 

165,091 

 

 

178,102 

 



Accounts payable

 

15,020 

 

 

12,576 

 

 

6,199 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
 2015 2014 2013 

Sales

 $24,436 $39,777 $49,748 

Accounts receivable

  3,645  7,543  4,632 

Purchases

  178,102  279,177  111,048 

Accounts payable

  6,199  21,029  9,936 

Note 11. Retirement Plans



The company sponsors several 401(k) retirement savings and profit sharing plans (Plans) for eligible employees, which are considered "qualified plans"“qualified plans” for federal income tax purposes. The company'scompany’s total expense for the Plans was $21.0$92.5 million, $39.4$64.7 million, and $25.2$21.0 million for the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014,2017, 2016, and 2013,2015, respectively. The company'scompany’s profit sharing component is 8% of consolidated pretax income excluding noncontrolling interests and other items. The resulting company profit sharing component was $17.7$80.7 million, $36.3$59.3 million, and $23.1$17.7 million for the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014,2017, 2016, and 2013,2015, respectively; of which $14.1$64.5 million, $29.0$47.5 million, and $18.5$14.1 million, respectively, was directed by the company'scompany’s board of directors to be contributed to the Plans, with the remaining amounts each year paid directly in cash to the Plans'Plans’ participants.


Table of Contents


STEEL DYNAMICS, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

Note 12. Leases

The company has operating leases relating principally to transportation and other equipment and real estate.  Certain leases include escalation clauses and/or purchase options. The company paid $15.1 million, $16.0 million, and $13.5$18.9 million for operating leases for the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014,2017, and 2013,$15.1 million for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively. At December 31, 2015,2017, future minimum payments for all non-cancelable operating leases with an initial or remaining term of one year or more are as follows (in thousands):



 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 



2018

 

$

16,036 

 



2019

 

 

12,609 

 



2020

 

 

9,496 

 



2021

 

 

5,868 

 



2022

 

 

4,051 

 



Thereafter

 

 

5,754 

 



 

 

$

53,814 

 

66


STEEL DYNAMICS, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

2016

 $14,699 

2017

  9,614 

2018

  7,429 

2019

  6,609 

2020

  4,623 

Thereafter

  6,686 

 $49,660 

Note 13.  Segment Information



The company'scompany’s operations are primarily organized and managed by reportable operating segment.segments, which are steel operations, metals recycling operations, and steel fabrication operations. The segment operations are more fully described in Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements. Operating segment performance and resource allocations are primarily based on operating results before income taxes. The accounting policies of the reportable segments are consistent with those described in Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements. Intra-segmentIntra‑segment sales and any related profits are eliminated in consolidation. In the third quarter 2015, the company changed its reportable segments, consistent with how it currently manages the business, in three reporting segments: steel operations (includes Columbus Flat Roll Division since its September 16, 2014 acquisition), metals recycling operations, and steel fabrication operations. The segment operations are described in Note 1 to the financial statements. Amounts included in the category "Other"“Other” are from subsidiary operations that are below the quantitative thresholds required for reportable segments and primarily consistsconsist of our Minnesota ironmaking operations and several smallersmall joint ventures. In addition, "Other"“Other” also includes certain unallocated corporate accounts, such as the company'scompany’s senior secured credit facility, senior notes, certain other investments and certain profit sharing expenses. Segment information presented below has been adjusted for all prior periods consistent with the current reportable

The company’s segment presentation.results are as follows (in thousands):




 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

Metals

 

Steel

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

For The Year Ended

 

Steel

 

Recycling

 

Fabrication

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

December 31, 2017

 

Operations

 

Operations

 

Operations

 

Other

 

Eliminations

 

Consolidated



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net Sales

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  External

 

$

6,613,944 

 

$

1,204,188 

 

$

823,630 

 

$

373,212 

 

$

 -

 

$

9,014,974 

  External Non-United States

 

 

317,819 

 

 

205,853 

 

 

151 

 

 

 -

 

 

 -

 

 

523,823 

  Other segments

 

 

243,646 

 

 

1,402,963 

 

 

644 

 

 

2,299 

 

 

(1,649,552)

 

 

 -



 

 

7,175,409 

 

 

2,813,004 

 

 

824,425 

 

 

375,511 

 

 

(1,649,552)

 

 

9,538,797 

Operating income (loss)

 

 

1,098,630 

 

 

71,052 

 

 

87,295 

 

 

(190,785)

(1)

 

689 

(2)

 

1,066,881 

Income (loss) before income taxes

 

 

1,014,863 

 

 

64,638 

 

 

81,046 

 

 

(226,001)

 

 

689 

 

 

935,235 

Depreciation and amortization

 

 

227,752 

 

 

48,830 

 

 

11,507 

 

 

10,910 

 

 

 -

 

 

298,999 

Capital expenditures

 

 

128,749 

 

 

25,998 

 

 

7,506 

 

 

2,682 

 

 

 -

 

 

164,935 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

As of December 31, 2017

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Assets

 

$

4,257,167 

 

$

1,011,298 

 

$

384,402 

 

$

1,334,361 

(3)

$

(131,496)

(4)

$

6,855,732 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Table of Contents


STEEL DYNAMICS, INC.



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Footnotes related to the year ended December 31, 2017, segment results (in millions):



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(1)

Corporate SG&A

$

(49.4)

 

(2)

Gross profit increase from intra-company sales

$

0.7 



Company-wide equity-based compensation

 

(36.5)

 

 

 

 

 



Profit sharing

 

(87.6)

 

 

 

 

 



Minnesota ironmaking operations

 

(12.8)

 

 

 

 

 



Other, net

 

(4.5)

 

 

 

 

 



 

$

(190.8)

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(3)

Cash and equivalents

$

1,003.2 

 

(4)

Elimination of intercompany receivables

$

(106.1)



Accounts receivable

 

9.4 

 

 

Elimination of intra-company debt

 

(13.4)



Inventories

 

58.8 

 

 

Other

 

(12.0)



Income tax receivable

 

57.3 

 

 

 

$

(131.5)



Property, plant and equipment, net

 

160.9 

 

 

 

 

 



Intra-company debt

 

13.4 

 

 

 

 

 



Other

 

31.4 

 

 

 

 

 



 

$

1,334.4 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

Note 13. Segment Information (Continued)

The company's segment results for the years ended December 31, are as follows (in thousands):

For the Year Ended December 31, 2015
 Steel
Operations
 Metals
Recycling
Operations
 Steel
Fabrication
Operations
 Other Eliminations Consolidated 

Net Sales

                   

External

 $4,935,549 $1,249,061 $671,323 $283,965 $ $7,139,898 

External Non-U.S. 

  267,963  183,942  2,051  557    454,513 

Other segments

  218,963  904,713  25  30,325  (1,154,026)  

  5,422,475  2,337,716  673,399  314,847  (1,154,026) 7,594,411 

Operating income (loss)

  403,216  (448,137)(7) 115,947  (148,784)(1) 4,974(2) (72,784)

Income (loss) before income taxes

  312,402  (465,426)(7) 108,795  (202,862) 4,974  (242,117)

Depreciation and amortization

  205,827  65,640  9,587  13,746  (205) 294,595 

Capital expenditures

  71,752  21,874  3,395  17,480    114,501 

As of December 31, 2015

  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
 

Assets

 $3,827,108 $1,067,672 $341,276 $1,050,506(3)$(84,480)(4)$6,202,082 

Liabilities

  603,505  250,719  88,439  2,667,189(5) (79,221)(6) 3,530,631 

Footnotes related to the year ended December 31, 2015 segment results (in millions):

(1) Corporate SG&A $(34.7)(2) Gross profit increase from intra-company sales $5.0 
  Company-wide equity-based compensation  (27.4)       
  Profit sharing  (17.7)       
  Minnesota ironmaking operations  (55.7)       
  Other, net  (13.3)       
    $(148.8)       

(3)

 

Cash and equivalents

 

$

641.9

 

(4)

 

Elimination of intra-company receivables

 

$

(74.9

)
  Accounts receivable  18.8   Elimination of intra-company debt  (6.2)
  Inventories  35.1   Other  (3.4)
  Property, plant and equipment, net  306.0     $(84.5)
  Intra-company debt  6.2        
  Other  42.5        
    $1,050.5        

(5)

 

Accounts payable

 

$

102.3

 

(6)

 

Elimination of intra-company payables

 

$

(74.9

)
  Income taxes payable  2.2   Elimination of intra-company debt  (6.2)
  Accrued interest  38.3   Other  1.9 
  Accrued profit sharing  17.7     $(79.2)
  Debt  2,588.7        
  Deferred income taxes  (109.0)       
  Other  27.0        
    $2,667.2        

(7)

 

Includes $428.5 million of pretax non-cash asset impairment charges.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Table of Contents67



STEEL DYNAMICS, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

Metals

 

Steel

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

For The Year Ended

 

Steel

 

Recycling

 

Fabrication

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

December 31, 2016

 

Operations

 

Operations

 

Operations

 

Other

 

Eliminations

 

Consolidated



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net Sales

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  External

 

$

5,399,275 

 

$

1,007,781 

 

$

700,852 

 

$

271,828 

 

$

 -

 

$

7,379,736 

  External Non-United States

 

 

235,436 

 

 

161,560 

 

 

189 

 

 

188 

 

 

 -

 

 

397,373 

  Other segments

 

 

236,213 

 

 

1,002,536 

 

 

2,481 

 

 

4,896 

 

 

(1,246,126)

 

 

 -



 

 

5,870,924 

 

 

2,171,877 

 

 

703,522 

 

 

276,912 

 

 

(1,246,126)

 

 

7,777,109 

Operating income (loss)

 

 

926,954 

 

 

20,423 

(5)

 

90,955 

 

 

(301,116)

(1)

 

(9,250)

(2)

 

727,966 

Income (loss) before income taxes

 

 

836,818 

 

 

8,378 

(5)

 

82,776 

 

 

(354,589)

 

 

(9,250)

 

 

564,133 

Depreciation and amortization

 

 

213,227 

 

 

56,483 

 

 

10,952 

 

 

15,652 

 

 

(205)

 

 

296,109 

Capital expenditures

 

 

160,767 

 

 

29,443 

 

 

3,123 

 

 

4,827 

 

 

 -

 

 

198,160 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

As of December 31, 2016

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Assets

 

$

4,126,448 

 

$

1,038,946 

 

$

340,902 

 

$

1,054,448 

(3)

$

(137,012)

(4)

$

6,423,732 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Footnotes related to the year ended December 31, 2016, segment results (in millions):



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(1)

Corporate SG&A

$

(48.9)

 

(2)

Gross profit decrease from intra-company sales

$

(11.1)



Company-wide equity-based compensation

 

(30.4)

 

 

Non-cash asset impairment charges

 

1.8 



Profit sharing

 

(66.4)

 

 

 

$

(9.3)



Minnesota ironmaking operations

 

(15.8)

 

 

 

 

 



Minnesota ironmaking operations non-cash

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



    asset impairment charges ($127.3 net

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



    of eliminating amounts)

 

(129.1)

 

 

 

 

 



Other, net

 

(10.5)

 

 

 

 

 



 

$

(301.1)

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(3)

Cash and equivalents

$

775.7 

 

(4)

Elimination of intercompany receivables

$

(112.3)



Accounts receivable

 

2.0 

 

 

Elimination of intra-company debt

 

(12.1)



Inventories

 

35.4 

 

 

Other

 

(12.6)



Income tax receivable

 

25.3 

 

 

 

$

(137.0)



Property, plant and equipment, net

 

168.5 

 

 

 

 

 



Intra-company debt

 

12.1 

 

 

 

 

 



Other

 

35.4 

 

 

 

 

 



 

$

1,054.4 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(5)

Includes $5.5 million of non-cash goodwill

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



impairment charges.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

68


STEEL DYNAMICS, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

Note 13. Segment Information (Continued)



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

Metals

 

Steel

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

For The Year Ended

 

Steel

 

Recycling

 

Fabrication

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

December 31, 2015

 

Operations

 

Operations

 

Operations

 

Other

 

Eliminations

 

Consolidated



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net Sales

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  External

 

$

4,935,549 

 

$

1,249,061 

 

$

671,323 

 

$

283,965 

 

$

 -

 

$

7,139,898 

  External Non-United States

 

 

267,963 

 

 

183,942 

 

 

2,051 

 

 

557 

 

 

 -

 

 

454,513 

  Other segments

 

 

218,963 

 

 

904,713 

 

 

25 

 

 

30,325 

 

 

(1,154,026)

 

 

 -



 

 

5,422,475 

 

 

2,337,716 

 

 

673,399 

 

 

314,847 

 

 

(1,154,026)

 

 

7,594,411 

Operating income (loss)

 

 

403,216 

 

 

(448,137)

(3)

 

115,947 

 

 

(148,784)

(1)

 

4,974 

(2)

 

(72,784)

Income (loss) before income taxes

 

 

312,402 

 

 

(465,426)

(3)

 

108,795 

 

 

(202,862)

 

 

4,974 

 

 

(242,117)

Depreciation and amortization

 

 

205,827 

 

 

65,640 

 

 

9,587 

 

 

13,746 

 

 

(205)

 

 

294,595 

Capital expenditures

 

 

71,752 

 

 

21,874 

 

 

3,395 

 

 

17,480 

 

 

 -

 

 

114,501 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Footnotes related to the year ended December 31, 2015, segment results (in millions):



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(1)

Corporate SG&A

$

(37.8)

 

(2)

Gross profit increase from intra-company sales

$

5.0 



Company-wide equity-based compensation

 

(27.1)

 

 

 

 

 



Profit sharing

 

(17.7)

 

 

 

 

 



Minnesota ironmaking operations

 

(55.7)

 

 

 

 

 



Other, net

 

(10.5)

 

 

 

 

 



 

$

(148.8)

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(3)

Includes $428.5 million of pretax non-cash asset

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



impairment charges.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

For the Year Ended December 31, 2014
 Steel
Operations
 Metals
Recycling
Operations
 Steel
Fabrication
Operations
 Other Eliminations Consolidated 

Net Sales

                   

External

 $5,300,762 $1,985,927 $631,750 $354,519 $ $8,272,958 

External Non-U.S. 

  240,981  240,900    1,113    482,994 

Other segments

  279,835  1,312,379  58  112,873  (1,705,145)  

  5,821,578  3,539,206  631,808  468,505  (1,705,145) 8,755,952 

Operating income (loss)

  683,609  26,014  51,894  (445,549)(1) 4,352(2) 320,320 

Income (loss) before income taxes

  614,653  5,670  45,376  (505,248)(7) 4,352  164,803 

Depreciation and amortization

  149,064  75,242  9,712  29,512  (205) 263,325 

Capital expenditures

  62,807  22,223  3,027  23,728    111,785 

As of December 31, 2014

  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
 

Assets

 $4,511,436 $1,767,820 $301,156 $793,389(3)$(140,642)(4)$7,233,159 

Liabilities

  776,804  352,271  42,074  3,270,878(5) (130,735)(6) 4,311,292 

Footnotes related to the year ended December 31, 2014 segment results (in millions):

(1)

 

Corporate SG&A

 $(42.0)(2) Gross profit increase from intra-company sales $4.4 

 

Company-wide equity-based compensation

  (22.8)       

 

Profit sharing

  (36.8)       

 

Minnesota ironmaking operations

  (69.8)       

 

Minnesota ironmaking operations non-cash asset impairment charges

  (260.0)       

 

Other, net

  (14.1)       

   $(445.5)       

(3)

 

Cash and equivalents

 
$

272.3
 

(4)

 

Elimination of intra-company receivables

 
$

(125.1

)

 

Accounts receivable

  36.8   Elimination of intra-company debt  (7.1)

 

Inventories

  95.2   Other  (8.4)

 

Property, plant and equipment, net

  313.6     $(140.6)

 

Intra-company debt

  7.1        

 

Other

  68.4        

   $793.4        

(5)

 

Accounts payable

 
$

126.9
 

(6)

 

Elimination of intra-company payables

 
$

(125.2

)

 

Income taxes payable

  6.1   Elimination of intra-company debt  (7.1)

 

Accrued interest

  50.2   Other  1.6 

 

Accrued profit sharing

  36.8     $(130.7)

 

Debt

  2,975.0        

 

Deferred income taxes

  36.9        

 

Other

  39.0        

   $3,270.9        

(7)

 

Includes $25.2 million of acquisition and bridge financing costs associated with the acquisition of Columbus.

           

Table of Contents69



STEEL DYNAMICS, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

Note 13. Segment Information (Continued)

For the Year Ended December 31, 2013
 Steel
Operations
 Metals
Recycling
Operations
 Steel
Fabrication
Operations
 Other Eliminations Consolidated 

Net Sales

                   

External

 $4,256,077 $2,066,572 $438,254 $194,823 $ $6,955,726 

External Non-U.S. 

  205,380  210,978    840    417,198 

Other segments

  223,390  997,316  1,401  103,416  (1,325,523)  

  4,684,847  3,274,866  439,655  299,079  (1,325,523) 7,372,924 

Operating income (loss)

  516,125  41,949  7,003  (177,939)(1) (613)(2) 386,525 

Income (loss) before income taxes

  461,151  15,831  827  (214,366) (613) 262,830 

Depreciation and amortization

  116,533  80,483  8,736  25,381  (205) 230,928 

Capital expenditures

  126,772  32,354  2,166  25,551    186,843 

As of December 31, 2013

  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
 

Assets

 $2,760,752 $1,840,490 $270,160 $1,106,856(3)$(89,724)(4)$5,888,534 

Liabilities

  572,573  364,231  22,648  2,394,072(5) (77,359)(6) 3,276,165 

Footnotes related to the year ended December 31, 2013 segment results (in millions):

(1) Corporate SG&A $(36.0)(2) Gross profit increase from intra-company sales $(0.6)
  Company-wide equity-based compensation  (15.2)       
  Profit sharing  (23.4)       
  Minnesota ironmaking operations  (93.3)       
  Other, net  (10.0)       
    $(177.9)       

(3)

 

Cash and equivalents

 

$

328.3

 

(4)

 

Elimination of intra-company receivables

 

$

(69.0

)
  Accounts receivable  24.7   Elimination of intra-company debt  (8.0)
  Inventories  91.2   Other  (12.7)
  Property, plant and equipment, net  579.9     $(89.7)
  Intra-company debt  8.0        
  Other  74.8        
    $1,106.9        

(5)

 

Accounts payable

 

$

82.8

 

(6)

 

Elimination of intra-company payables

 

$

(69.0

)
  Income taxes payable  4.0   Elimination of intra-company debt  (8.0)
  Accrued interest  31.2   Other  (0.4)
  Accrued profit sharing  23.4     $(77.4)
  Debt  2,074.8        
  Deferred income taxes  139.1        
  Other  38.8        
    $2,394.1        

Table of Contents


STEEL DYNAMICS, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

Note 14.  Condensed Consolidating Information



Certain 100%-owned owned subsidiaries of SDI have fully and unconditionally guaranteed jointly and severally all of the indebtedness relating to the issuance of the company'scompany’s senior unsecured notes due 2019, 2021, 2022, 2023, 2024, 2025 and 2024.2026. Following are the company'scompany’s condensed consolidating financial statements, including the guarantors, which present the financial position, results of operations, and cash flows of (i) SDI (in each case, reflecting investments in its consolidated subsidiaries under the equity method of accounting), (ii) the guarantor subsidiaries of SDI, which includes Columbus Flat Roll Division since acquired on September 16, 2014, (iii) the non-guarantor subsidiaries of SDI, and (iv) the eliminations necessary to arrive at the information on a consolidated basis. The following statements should be read in conjunction with the accompanying consolidated financial statements, and notes thereto.

Condensed Consolidating Balance Sheets (in thousands)



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Condensed Consolidating Balance Sheets (in thousands)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Combined

 

Consolidating

 

Total

As of December 31, 2017

 

Parent

 

Guarantors

 

Non-Guarantors

 

Adjustments

 

Consolidated

Cash and equivalents

 

$

1,001,405 

 

$

20,441 

 

$

6,803 

 

$

 -

 

$

1,028,649 

Accounts receivable, net

 

 

274,968 

 

 

1,426,036 

 

 

37,387 

 

 

(869,554)

 

 

868,837 

Inventories

 

 

685,103 

 

 

752,151 

 

 

91,890 

 

 

(9,797)

 

 

1,519,347 

Other current assets

 

 

73,748 

 

 

16,005 

 

 

5,962 

 

 

(4,206)

 

 

91,509 

  Total current assets

 

 

2,035,224 

 

 

2,214,633 

 

 

142,042 

 

 

(883,557)

 

 

3,508,342 

Property, plant and equipment, net

 

 

859,419 

 

 

1,618,438 

 

 

198,047 

 

 

 -

 

 

2,675,904 

Intangible assets, net

 

 

 -

 

 

225,503 

 

 

31,406 

 

 

 -

 

 

256,909 

Goodwill

 

 

 -

 

 

379,069 

 

 

7,824 

 

 

 -

 

 

386,893 

Other assets, including investments in subs

 

 

2,512,594 

 

 

6,622 

 

 

5,505 

 

 

(2,497,037)

 

 

27,684 

  Total assets

 

$

5,407,237 

 

$

4,444,265 

 

$

384,824 

 

$

(3,380,594)

 

$

6,855,732 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Accounts payable

 

$

168,282 

 

$

316,676 

 

$

101,948 

 

$

(97,458)

 

$

489,448 

Accrued expenses

 

 

222,023 

 

 

254,196 

 

 

10,243 

 

 

(136,186)

 

 

350,276 

Current maturities of long-term debt

 

 

731 

 

 

 -

 

 

56,454 

 

 

(28,390)

 

 

28,795 

  Total current liabilities

 

 

391,036 

 

 

570,872 

 

 

168,645 

 

 

(262,034)

 

 

868,519 

Long-term debt

 

 

2,326,466 

 

 

 -

 

 

169,799 

 

 

(143,120)

 

 

2,353,145 

Other liabilities

 

 

(661,839)

 

 

869,196 

 

 

24,868 

 

 

95,535 

 

 

327,760 

  Total liabilities

 

 

2,055,663 

 

 

1,440,068 

 

 

363,312 

 

 

(309,619)

 

 

3,549,424 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Redeemable noncontrolling interests

 

 

 -

 

 

 -

 

 

111,240 

 

 

 -

 

 

111,240 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Common stock

 

 

644 

 

 

1,727,859 

 

 

14,908 

 

 

(1,742,767)

 

 

644 

Treasury stock

 

 

(665,297)

 

 

 -

 

 

 -

 

 

 -

 

 

(665,297)

Additional paid-in capital

 

 

1,141,534 

 

 

128,076 

 

 

797,196 

 

 

(925,272)

 

 

1,141,534 

Retained earnings (deficit)

 

 

2,874,693 

 

 

1,148,262 

 

 

(745,326)

 

 

(402,936)

 

 

2,874,693 

  Total Steel Dynamics, Inc. equity

 

 

3,351,574 

 

 

3,004,197 

 

 

66,778 

 

 

(3,070,975)

 

 

3,351,574 

Noncontrolling interests

 

 

 -

 

 

 -

 

 

(156,506)

 

 

 -

 

 

(156,506)

  Total equity

 

 

3,351,574 

 

 

3,004,197 

 

 

(89,728)

 

 

(3,070,975)

 

 

3,195,068 

  Total liabilities and equity

 

$

5,407,237 

 

$

4,444,265 

 

$

384,824 

 

$

(3,380,594)

 

$

6,855,732 

As of December 31, 2015
 Parent Guarantors Combined
Non-Guarantors
 Consolidating
Adjustments
 Total
Consolidated
 

Cash and equivalents

 $636,877 $81,976 $8,179 $ $727,032 

Accounts receivable, net

  200,094  1,056,285  29,775  (672,549) 613,605 

Inventories

  539,963  573,924  35,004  499  1,149,390 

Other current assets

  21,654  25,415  1,676  (831) 47,914 

Total current assets

  1,398,588  1,737,600  74,634  (672,881) 2,537,941 

Property, plant and equipment, net

  958,212  1,703,932  291,077  (2,011) 2,951,210 

Intangible assets, net

    278,960      278,960 

Goodwill

    397,470      397,470 

Other assets, including investments in subs

  2,941,710  10,040  6,137  (2,921,386) 36,501 

Total assets

 $5,298,510 $4,128,002 $371,848 $(3,596,278)$6,202,082 

Accounts payable

 
$

100,751
 
$

183,344
 
$

68,948
 
$

(69,688

)

$

283,355
 

Accrued expenses

  141,552  185,873  4,779  (96,949) 235,255 

Current maturities of long-term debt

  13,122  700  24,975  (22,117) 16,680 

Total current liabilities

  255,425  369,917  98,702  (188,754) 535,290 

Long-term debt

  2,546,606  361  177,897  (146,888) 2,577,976 

Other liabilities

  (183,248) 1,342,541  63,020  (804,948) 417,365 

Redeemable noncontrolling interests

  
  
  
126,340
  
  
126,340
 

Common stock

  
638
  
1,727,859
  
18,120
  
(1,745,979

)
 
638
 

Treasury stock

  (396,455)       (396,455)

Additional paid-in-capital

  1,110,253  117,737  646,787  (764,524) 1,110,253 

Retained earnings (deficit)

  1,965,291  569,587  (624,402) 54,815  1,965,291 

Total Steel Dynamics, Inc. equity

  2,679,727  2,415,183  40,505  (2,455,688) 2,679,727 

Noncontrolling interests

      (134,616)   (134,616)

Total equity

  2,679,727  2,415,183  (94,111) (2,455,688) 2,545,111 

Total liabilities and equity

 $5,298,510 $4,128,002 $371,848 $(3,596,278)$6,202,082 

Table of Contents70



STEEL DYNAMICS, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

Note 14.  Condensed Consolidating Information (Continued)



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Combined

 

Consolidating

 

Total

As of December 31, 2016

 

Parent

 

Guarantors

 

Non-Guarantors

 

Adjustments

 

Consolidated

Cash and equivalents

 

$

766,685 

 

$

54,677 

 

$

20,121 

 

$

 -

 

$

841,483 

Accounts receivable, net

 

 

229,148 

 

 

1,257,245 

 

 

23,689 

 

 

(780,298)

 

 

729,784 

Inventories

 

 

587,319 

 

 

639,148 

 

 

58,696 

 

 

(9,952)

 

 

1,275,211 

Other current assets

 

 

45,049 

 

 

36,062 

 

 

4,447 

 

 

(2,361)

 

 

83,197 

  Total current assets

 

 

1,628,201 

 

 

1,987,132 

 

 

106,953 

 

 

(792,611)

 

 

2,929,675 

Property, plant and equipment, net

 

 

899,370 

 

 

1,679,751 

 

 

208,094 

 

 

 -

 

 

2,787,215 

Intangible assets, net

 

 

 -

 

 

251,919 

 

 

32,058 

 

 

 -

 

 

283,977 

Goodwill

 

 

 -

 

 

385,527 

 

 

7,824 

 

 

 -

 

 

393,351 

Other assets, including investments in subs

 

 

2,769,884 

 

 

7,335 

 

 

5,832 

 

 

(2,753,537)

 

 

29,514 

  Total assets

 

$

5,297,455 

 

$

4,311,664 

 

$

360,761 

 

$

(3,546,148)

 

$

6,423,732 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Accounts payable

 

$

141,089 

 

$

265,764 

 

$

89,659 

 

$

(101,316)

 

$

395,196 

Accrued expenses

 

 

198,085 

 

 

220,917 

 

 

8,793 

 

 

(113,808)

 

 

313,987 

Current maturities of long-term debt

 

 

674 

 

 

700 

 

 

29,347 

 

 

(27,089)

 

 

3,632 

  Total current liabilities

 

 

339,848 

 

 

487,381 

 

 

127,799 

 

 

(242,213)

 

 

712,815 

Long-term debt

 

 

2,324,298 

 

 

 -

 

 

168,566 

 

 

(139,670)

 

 

2,353,194 

Other liabilities

 

 

(293,711)

 

 

1,219,444 

 

 

42,482 

 

 

(499,191)

 

 

469,024 

  Total liabilities

 

 

2,370,435 

 

 

1,706,825 

 

 

338,847 

 

 

(881,074)

 

 

3,535,033 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Redeemable noncontrolling interests

 

 

 -

 

 

 -

 

 

111,240 

 

 

 -

 

 

111,240 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Common stock

 

 

641 

 

 

1,727,859 

 

 

14,908 

 

 

(1,742,767)

 

 

641 

Treasury stock

 

 

(416,829)

 

 

 -

 

 

 -

 

 

 -

 

 

(416,829)

Additional paid-in capital

 

 

1,132,749 

 

 

128,076 

 

 

779,678 

 

 

(907,754)

 

 

1,132,749 

Retained earnings (deficit)

 

 

2,210,459 

 

 

748,904 

 

 

(734,351)

 

 

(14,553)

 

 

2,210,459 

  Total Steel Dynamics, Inc. equity

 

 

2,927,020 

 

 

2,604,839 

 

 

60,235 

 

 

(2,665,074)

 

 

2,927,020 

Noncontrolling interests

 

 

 -

 

 

 -

 

 

(149,561)

 

 

 -

 

 

(149,561)

  Total equity

 

 

2,927,020 

 

 

2,604,839 

 

 

(89,326)

 

 

(2,665,074)

 

 

2,777,459 

  Total liabilities and equity

 

$

5,297,455 

 

$

4,311,664 

 

$

360,761 

 

$

(3,546,148)

 

$

6,423,732 

As of December 31, 2014
 Parent Guarantors Combined
Non-Guarantors
 Consolidating
Adjustments
 Total
Consolidated
 

Cash and equivalents

 $265,313 $81,690 $14,360 $ $361,363 

Accounts receivable, net

  321,493  1,176,849  44,696  (640,213) 902,825 

Inventories

  662,970  862,796  94,916  (2,263) 1,618,419 

Other current assets

  59,243  8,416  6,465  (18,469) 55,655 

Total current assets

  1,309,019  2,129,751  160,437  (660,945) 2,938,262 

Property, plant and equipment, net

  1,002,407  1,826,208  297,505  (2,214) 3,123,906 

Intangible assets, net

    370,669      370,669 

Goodwill

    745,158      745,158 

Other assets, including investments in subs

  3,858,706  24,810  6,255  (3,834,607) 55,164 

Total assets

 $6,170,132 $5,096,596 $464,197 $(4,497,766)$7,233,159 

Accounts payable

 
$

151,517
 
$

371,037
 
$

98,886
 
$

(110,384

)

$

511,056
 

Accrued expenses

  191,433  166,101  11,695  (76,163) 293,066 

Current maturities of long-term debt

  13,073  777  73,767  (41,157) 46,460 

Total current liabilities

  356,023  537,915  184,348  (227,704) 850,582 

Long-term debt

  2,900,375  624  158,333  (123,943) 2,935,389 

Other liabilities

  719  1,807,989  28,559  (1,311,946) 525,321 

Redeemable noncontrolling interests

  
  
  
126,340
  
  
126,340
 

Common stock

  
635
  
1,727,859
  
18,121
  
(1,745,980

)
 
635
 

Treasury stock

  (398,898)       (398,898)

Additional paid-in-capital

  1,083,435  117,737  635,156  (752,893) 1,083,435 

Retained earnings (deficit)

  2,227,843  904,472  (569,172) (335,300) 2,227,843 

Total Steel Dynamics, Inc. equity

  2,913,015  2,750,068  84,105  (2,834,173) 2,913,015 

Noncontrolling interests

      (117,488)   (117,488)

Total equity

  2,913,015  2,750,068  (33,383) (2,834,173) 2,795,527 

Total liabilities and equity

 $6,170,132 $5,096,596 $464,197 $(4,497,766)$7,233,159 

Table of Contents71



STEEL DYNAMICS, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

Note 14.  Condensed Consolidating Information (Continued)



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Condensed Consolidating Statements of Operations (in thousands)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Combined

 

Consolidating

 

Total

For the year ended December 31, 2017

 

Parent

 

Guarantors

 

Non-Guarantors

 

Adjustments

 

Consolidated

Net sales

 

$

3,702,597 

 

$

10,366,526 

 

$

597,789 

 

$

(5,128,115)

 

$

9,538,797 

Costs of goods sold

 

 

2,994,257 

 

 

9,399,996 

 

 

577,205 

 

 

(5,014,675)

 

 

7,956,783 

  Gross profit

 

 

708,340 

 

 

966,530 

 

 

20,584 

 

 

(113,440)

 

 

1,582,014 

Selling, general and administrative

 

 

221,736 

 

 

293,161 

 

 

20,493 

 

 

(20,257)

 

 

515,133 

  Operating income (loss)

 

 

486,604 

 

 

673,369 

 

 

91 

 

 

(93,183)

 

 

1,066,881 

Interest expense, net of capitalized interest

 

 

73,521 

 

 

57,622 

 

 

12,901 

 

 

(9,645)

 

 

134,399 

Other (income) expense, net

 

 

(2,305)

 

 

(9,937)

 

 

(156)

 

 

9,645 

 

 

(2,753)

Income (loss) before income taxes and

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  equity in net income of subsidiaries

 

 

415,388 

 

 

625,684 

 

 

(12,654)

 

 

(93,183)

 

 

935,235 

Income taxes (benefit)

 

 

(69,961)

 

 

226,327 

 

 

5,266 

 

 

(32,193)

 

 

129,439 



 

 

485,349 

 

 

399,357 

 

 

(17,920)

 

 

(60,990)

 

 

805,796 

Equity in net income of subsidiaries

 

 

327,392 

 

 

 -

 

 

 -

 

 

(327,392)

 

 

 -

Net loss attributable to noncontrolling interests

 

 

 -

 

 

 -

 

 

6,945 

 

 

 -

 

 

6,945 

Net income (loss) attributable to Steel Dynamics, Inc.

 

$

812,741 

 

$

399,357 

 

$

(10,975)

 

$

(388,382)

 

$

812,741 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Combined

 

Consolidating

 

Total

For the year ended December 31, 2016

 

Parent

 

Guarantors

 

Non-Guarantors

 

Adjustments

 

Consolidated

Net sales

 

$

3,037,801 

 

$

8,356,727 

 

$

388,071 

 

$

(4,005,490)

 

$

7,777,109 

Costs of goods sold

 

 

2,428,863 

 

 

7,522,791 

 

 

390,313 

 

 

(3,899,722)

 

 

6,442,245 

  Gross profit (loss)

 

 

608,938 

 

 

833,936 

 

 

(2,242)

 

 

(105,768)

 

 

1,334,864 

Selling, general and administrative

 

 

196,442 

 

 

281,071 

 

 

16,103 

 

 

(19,557)

 

 

474,059 

Asset impairment charges

 

 

12,700 

 

 

5,500 

 

 

116,445 

 

 

(1,806)

 

 

132,839 

  Operating income (loss)

 

 

399,796 

 

 

547,365 

 

 

(134,790)

 

 

(84,405)

 

 

727,966 

Interest expense, net of capitalized interest

 

 

71,182 

 

 

72,420 

 

 

10,874 

 

 

(8,439)

 

 

146,037 

Other (income) expense, net

 

 

14,200 

 

 

(5,363)

 

 

520 

 

 

8,439 

 

 

17,796 

Income (loss) before income taxes and

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  equity in net loss of subsidiaries

 

 

314,414 

 

 

480,308 

 

 

(146,184)

 

 

(84,405)

 

 

564,133 

Income taxes (benefit)

 

 

69,454 

 

 

180,990 

 

 

(15,825)

 

 

(30,492)

 

 

204,127 



 

 

244,960 

 

 

299,318 

 

 

(130,359)

 

 

(53,913)

 

 

360,006 

Equity in net loss of subsidiaries

 

 

137,155 

 

 

 -

 

 

 -

 

 

(137,155)

 

 

 -

Net loss attributable to noncontrolling interests

 

 

 -

 

 

 -

 

 

22,109 

 

 

 -

 

 

22,109 

Net income (loss) attributable to Steel Dynamics, Inc.

 

$

382,115 

 

$

299,318 

 

$

(108,250)

 

$

(191,068)

 

$

382,115 

72

Condensed Consolidating Statements of Operations (in thousands)


For the Year Ended, December 31, 2015
 Parent Guarantors Combined
Non-Guarantors
 Consolidating
Adjustments
 Total
Consolidated
 

Net sales

 $2,908,904 $8,132,043 $361,944 $(3,808,480)$7,594,411 

Costs of goods sold

  2,515,621  7,646,411  420,281  (3,719,620) 6,862,693 

Gross profit (loss)

  393,283  485,632  (58,337) (88,860) 731,718 

Selling, general and administrative

  128,929  254,106  11,893  (18,926) 376,002 

Asset impairment charges

    428,500      428,500 

Operating income (loss)

  264,354  (196,974) (70,230) (69,934) (72,784)

Interest expense, net of capitalized interest

  75,457  76,009  6,969  (4,485) 153,950 

Other (income) expense, net

  13,970  332  (3,404) 4,485  15,383 

Income (loss) before income taxes and equity in net loss of subsidiaries

  174,927  (273,315) (73,795) (69,934) (242,117)

Income taxes (benefit)

  (124,626) 61,571  (4,627) (29,265) (96,947)

  299,553  (334,886) (69,168) (40,669) (145,170)

Equity in net loss of subsidiaries

  (429,864)     429,864   

Net loss attributable to noncontrolling interests

      14,859    14,859 

Net income (loss) attributable to Steel Dynamics, Inc. 

 $(130,311)$(334,886)$(54,309)$389,195 $(130,311)


For the Year Ended, December 31, 2014
 Parent Guarantors Combined
Non-Guarantors
 Consolidating
Adjustments
 Total
Consolidated
 

Net sales

 $3,904,488 $9,761,236 $527,584 $(5,437,356)$8,755,952 

Costs of goods sold

  3,305,269  9,212,977  598,428  (5,326,933) 7,789,741 

Gross profit (loss)

  599,219  548,259  (70,844) (110,423) 966,211 

Selling, general and administrative

  149,374  241,163  13,503  (18,149) 385,891 

Asset impairment charges

      260,000    260,000 

Operating income (loss)

  449,845  307,096  (344,347) (92,274) 320,320 

Interest expense, net of capitalized interest

  78,442  56,006  7,745  (4,930) 137,263 

Other (income) expense, net

  18,976  (23) (5,629) 4,930  18,254 

Income (loss) before income taxes and equity in net loss of subsidiaries

  352,427  251,113  (346,463) (92,274) 164,803 

Income taxes (benefit)

  14,064  96,315  (1,095) (36,131) 73,153 

  338,363  154,798  (345,368) (56,143) 91,650 

Equity in net loss of subsidiaries

  (181,339)     181,339   

Net loss attributable to noncontrolling interests

      65,374    65,374 

Net income (loss) attributable to Steel Dynamics, Inc. 

 $157,024 $154,798 $(279,994)$125,196 $157,024 

Table of Contents


STEEL DYNAMICS, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

Note 14.  Condensed Consolidating Information (Continued)



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Combined

 

Consolidating

 

Total

For the year ended December 31, 2015

 

Parent

 

Guarantors

 

Non-Guarantors

 

Adjustments

 

Consolidated

Net sales

 

$

2,908,904 

 

$

8,132,043 

 

$

361,944 

 

$

(3,808,480)

 

$

7,594,411 

Costs of goods sold

 

 

2,515,621 

 

 

7,646,411 

 

 

420,281 

 

 

(3,719,620)

 

 

6,862,693 

  Gross profit (loss)

 

 

393,283 

 

 

485,632 

 

 

(58,337)

 

 

(88,860)

 

 

731,718 

Selling, general and administrative

 

 

128,929 

 

 

254,106 

 

 

11,893 

 

 

(18,926)

 

 

376,002 

Asset impairment charges

 

 

 -

 

 

428,500 

 

 

 -

 

 

 -

 

 

428,500 

  Operating income (loss)

 

 

264,354 

 

 

(196,974)

 

 

(70,230)

 

 

(69,934)

 

 

(72,784)

Interest expense, net of capitalized interest

 

 

75,457 

 

 

76,009 

 

 

6,969 

 

 

(4,485)

 

 

153,950 

Other (income) expense, net

 

 

13,970 

 

 

332 

 

 

(3,404)

 

 

4,485 

 

 

15,383 

Income (loss) before income taxes and

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  equity in net loss of subsidiaries

 

 

174,927 

 

 

(273,315)

 

 

(73,795)

 

 

(69,934)

 

 

(242,117)

Income taxes (benefit)

 

 

(124,626)

 

 

61,571 

 

 

(4,627)

 

 

(29,265)

 

 

(96,947)



 

 

299,553 

 

 

(334,886)

 

 

(69,168)

 

 

(40,669)

 

 

(145,170)

Equity in net loss of subsidiaries

 

 

(429,864)

 

 

 -

 

 

 -

 

 

429,864 

 

 

 -

Net loss attributable to noncontrolling interests

 

 

 -

 

 

 -

 

 

14,859 

 

 

 -

 

 

14,859 

Net income (loss) attributable to Steel Dynamics, Inc.

 

$

(130,311)

 

$

(334,886)

 

$

(54,309)

 

$

389,195 

 

$

(130,311)



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Condensed Consolidating Statements of Cash Flows (in thousands)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Combined

 

Consolidating

 

Total

For the year ended December 31, 2017

 

Parent

 

Guarantors

 

Non-Guarantors

 

Adjustments

 

Consolidated



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities

 

$

171,300 

 

$

594,279 

 

$

(31,719)

 

$

5,746 

 

$

739,606 

Net cash used in investing activities

 

 

(62,534)

 

 

(73,021)

 

 

(8,301)

 

 

4,751 

 

 

(139,105)

Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities

 

 

125,954 

 

 

(555,494)

 

 

26,702 

 

 

(10,497)

 

 

(413,335)

Increase (decrease) in cash and equivalents

 

 

234,720 

 

 

(34,236)

 

 

(13,318)

 

 

 -

 

 

187,166 

  Cash and equivalents at beginning of period

 

 

766,685 

 

 

54,677 

 

 

20,121 

 

 

 -

 

 

841,483 

  Cash and equivalents at end of period

 

$

1,001,405 

 

$

20,441 

 

$

6,803 

 

$

 -

 

$

1,028,649 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Combined

 

Consolidating

 

Total

For the year ended December 31, 2016

 

Parent

 

Guarantors

 

Non-Guarantors

 

Adjustments

 

Consolidated



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net cash provided by operating activities

 

$

326,216 

 

$

517,699 

 

$

6,057 

 

$

2,797 

 

$

852,769 

Net cash used in investing activities

 

 

(161,043)

 

 

(140,027)

 

 

(9,578)

 

 

(2,245)

 

 

(312,893)

Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities

 

 

(35,365)

 

 

(404,971)

 

 

15,463 

 

 

(552)

 

 

(425,425)

Increase (decrease) in cash and equivalents

 

 

129,808 

 

 

(27,299)

 

 

11,942 

 

 

 -

 

 

114,451 

  Cash and equivalents at beginning of period

 

 

636,877 

 

 

81,976 

 

 

8,179 

 

 

 -

 

 

727,032 

  Cash and equivalents at end of period

 

$

766,685 

 

$

54,677 

 

$

20,121 

 

$

 -

 

$

841,483 

73



For the Year Ended, December 31, 2013
 Parent Guarantors Combined
Non-Guarantors
 Consolidating
Adjustments
 Total
Consolidated
 

Net sales

 $3,466,691 $8,219,499 $347,288 $(4,660,554)$7,372,924 

Costs of goods sold

  2,981,591  7,805,367  440,064  (4,573,242) 6,653,780 

Gross profit (loss)

  485,100  414,132  (92,776) (87,312) 719,144 

Selling, general and administrative

  118,975  219,531  10,548  (16,435) 332,619 

Operating income (loss)

  366,125  194,601  (103,324) (70,877) 386,525 

Interest expense, net of capitalized interest

  81,361  43,879  7,259  (4,771) 127,728 

Other (income) expense, net

  (7,358) 3,401  (4,847) 4,771  (4,033)

Income (loss) before income taxes and equity in net income of subsidiaries

  292,122  147,321  (105,736) (70,877) 262,830 

Income taxes

  63,670  54,448  6,406  (25,210) 99,314 

  228,452  92,873  (112,142) (45,667) 163,516 

Equity in net loss of subsidiaries

  (39,138)     39,138   

Net loss attributable to noncontrolling interests

      25,798    25,798 

Net income (loss) attributable to Steel Dynamics, Inc. 

 $189,314 $92,873 $(86,344)$(6,529)$189,314 

Condensed Consolidating Statements of Cash Flows (in thousands)

For the Year Ended, December 31, 2015
 Parent Guarantors Combined
Non-Guarantors
 Consolidating
Adjustments
 Total
Consolidated
 

Net cash provided by operating activities

 $413,870 $601,437 $19,388 $3,788 $1,038,483 

Net cash used in investing activities

  (64,457) (89,751) (15,703) 20,284  (149,627)

Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities

  22,151  (511,400) (9,866) (24,072) (523,187)

Increase (decrease) in cash and equivalents

  371,564  286  (6,181)   365,669 

Cash and equivalents at beginning of period

  265,313  81,690  14,360    361,363 

Cash and equivalents at end of period

 $636,877 $81,976 $8,179 $ $727,032 

Table of Contents


STEEL DYNAMICS, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

Note 14.  Condensed Consolidating Information (Continued)


For the Year Ended, December 31, 2014
 Parent Guarantors Combined
Non-Guarantors
 Consolidating
Adjustments
 Total
Consolidated
 

Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities

 $400,204 $279,080 $(38,666)$(23,046)$617,572 

Net cash used in investing activities

  (1,690,363) (8,883) (23,206) (24,815) (1,747,267)

Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities

  1,234,606  (249,655) 63,090  47,861  1,095,902 

Increase (decrease) in cash and equivalents

  (55,553) 20,542  1,218    (33,793)

Cash and equivalents at beginning of period

  320,866  61,148  13,142    395,156 

Cash and equivalents at end of period

 $265,313 $81,690 $14,360 $ $361,363 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Combined

 

Consolidating

 

Total

For the year ended December 31, 2015

 

Parent

 

Guarantors

 

Non-Guarantors

 

Adjustments

 

Consolidated



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net cash provided by operating activities

 

$

436,012 

 

$

594,437 

 

$

19,388 

 

$

3,788 

 

$

1,053,625 

Net cash used in investing activities

 

 

(64,457)

 

 

(82,751)

 

 

(15,703)

 

 

20,284 

 

 

(142,627)

Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities

 

 

 

 

(511,400)

 

 

(9,866)

 

 

(24,072)

 

 

(545,329)

Increase (decrease) in cash and equivalents

 

 

371,564 

 

 

286 

 

 

(6,181)

 

 

 -

 

 

365,669 

  Cash and equivalents at beginning of period

 

 

265,313 

 

 

81,690 

 

 

14,360 

 

 

 -

 

 

361,363 

  Cash and equivalents at end of period

 

$

636,877 

 

$

81,976 

 

$

8,179 

 

$

 -

 

$

727,032 



For the Year Ended, December 31, 2013
 Parent Guarantors Combined
Non-Guarantors
 Consolidating
Adjustments
 Total
Consolidated
 

Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities

 $190,616 $190,885 $(80,525)$11,199 $312,175 

Net cash used in investing activities

  (170,561) (41,415) (23,086) 82,217  (152,845)

Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities

  (21,896) (129,997) 105,218  (93,416) (140,091)

Increase (decrease) in cash and equivalents

  (1,841) 19,473  1,607    19,239 

Cash and equivalents at beginning of period

  322,707  41,675  11,535    375,917 

Cash and equivalents at end of period

 $320,866 $61,148 $13,142 $ $395,156 

Table of Contents


STEEL DYNAMICS, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

Note 15. Quarterly Financial Information (unaudited, in thousands, except per share data)

 
 1st Quarter 2nd Quarter 3rd Quarter 4th Quarter 

2015:

             

Net sales

 $2,047,435 $2,005,007 $1,950,923 $1,591,046 

Gross profit

  187,042  171,743  228,726  144,207 

Operating income (loss)

  99,771  77,559  131,029  (381,143)

Net income (loss)

  26,954  25,325  58,867  (256,316)

Net income (loss) attributable to Steel Dynamics, Inc. 

  30,761  31,550  60,617  (253,239)

Earnings (loss) per share:

             

Basic

  .13  .13  .25  (1.04)

Diluted

  .13  .13  .25  (1.04)

2014:

  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
 

Net sales

 $1,830,082 $2,069,761 $2,339,016 $2,517,093 

Gross profit

  163,304  222,771  288,512  291,624 

Operating income (loss)

  80,932  131,905  188,643  (81,160)

Net income (loss)

  33,698  66,341  87,657  (96,046)

Net income (loss) attributable to Steel Dynamics, Inc. 

  38,579  72,303  91,173  (45,031)

Earnings (loss) per share:

             

Basic

  .17  .32  .38  (.19)

Diluted

  .17  .31  .38  (.19)

        The first quarter of 2015 reflects other non-operating expenses of $16.7 million associated with call premiums and write off of deferred financing costs related to the call and repayment of all $350.0 million of outstanding 75/8% Senior Notes due 2020.

The second quarter of 2015 reflects inventory lower-of-cost or market charges of $21.0 million (inclusive of noncontrolling interests of $3.6 million), in cost of goods sold, related to the May 2015 decision to idle the Minnesota ironmaking operations and to monetize existing raw material inventory.



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

1st Quarter

 

 

2nd Quarter

 

 

3rd Quarter

 

 

4th Quarter

 



2017:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



Net Sales

$

2,368,216 

 

$

2,390,720 

 

$

2,443,382 

��

$

2,336,479 

 



Gross profit

 

472,154 

 

 

392,518 

 

 

396,518 

 

 

320,824 

 



Operating income

 

334,566 

 

 

265,353 

 

 

271,015 

 

 

195,947 

 



Net income

 

198,666 

 

 

152,947 

 

 

151,012 

 

 

303,171 

 



Net income attributable to Steel Dynamics, Inc.

 

200,817 

 

 

153,933 

 

 

153,258 

 

 

304,733 

 



Earnings per share:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



   Basic

 

0.83 

 

 

0.64 

 

 

0.64 

 

 

1.28 

 



   Diluted

 

0.82 

 

 

0.63 

 

 

0.64 

 

 

1.28 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



2016:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



Net Sales

$

1,741,301 

 

$

2,023,902 

 

$

2,101,310 

 

$

1,910,596 

 



Gross profit

 

236,036 

 

 

380,383 

 

 

408,503 

 

 

309,942 

 



Operating income

 

131,965 

 

 

256,122 

 

 

283,855 

 

 

56,024 

 



Net income

 

61,318 

 

 

140,443 

 

 

154,413 

 

 

3,832 

 



Net income attributable to Steel Dynamics, Inc.

 

62,737 

 

 

141,969 

 

 

157,397 

 

 

20,012 

 



Earnings per share:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



   Basic

 

0.26 

 

 

0.58 

 

 

0.65 

 

 

0.08 

 



   Diluted

 

0.26 

 

 

0.58 

 

 

0.64 

 

 

0.08 

 



The fourth quarter of 2015 reflects pretax non-cash asset impairment charges related to goodwill, indefinite-lived intangibles and certain other assets associated with the company's metal recycling operations, which reduced operating income by $428.5 million, and2017 net income and net income attributable to Steel Dynamics, Inc. by $268.7 million.

        The third quarterreflects $180.6 million of 2014 reflects other non-operating expenses of $25.2 million associated with acquisition and bridge financing coststax benefit related primarily to the acquisitionimpacts of Columbus Flat Roll Division.the revaluation of the company’s deferred tax liabilities as of December 31, 2017, using the lower federal tax rate enacted in the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017.



The fourth quarter of 20142016 reflects pretax non-cash asset impairment charges associated with the company'scompany’s Minnesota ironmaking operations and certain OmniSource goodwill, which reduced operating and pretax income by $260.0$132.8 million, net income by $179.1$89.5 million and net income attributable to Steel Dynamics, Inc. by $132.6$76.4 million.  The fourth quarter of 2016 also reflects non-operating expenses of $16.5 million associated with call premiums and the write off of deferred financing costs related to the refinancing of $400.0 million of outstanding 6.125% Senior Notes due 2019 with $400.0 million 5.000% Senior Notes due 2026, and repayment of the $228.1 million outstanding senior secured term debt.



Earnings per share are computed independently for each of the quarters presented. Therefore, the sum of the quarterly earnings per share may not equal the total for the year.



ITEM 9.CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE

None.

ITEM 9A. ITEM 9A.    CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

(a)Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures.

    As required, we carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures, as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act).  Based on this evaluation, our principal executive officer and principal financial officer concluded that, as of December 31, 2015,2017, the end of the period covered by this annual report, our disclosure controls and procedures were designed to provide and were effective to provide reasonable assurance that the information required to be disclosed by us in the reports we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the applicable rules and forms, and that it is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our principal executive and principal financial officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

    Management's

    Management’s report on our internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rules 13a-15(f)13a‑15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) and the independent registered public accounting firm'sfirm’s related audit report are included in Item 8 of this Form 10-K and are incorporated herein by reference.

(b)Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting.Reporting

    No changechanges in our internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) occurred during the fiscal quarter ended December 31, 2015,2017, that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.



Our Management'sManagement’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting, as of December 31, 2015,2017, can be found on page 6044 of this Form 10-K, and the related Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm, Ernst & Young LLP, can be found on page 6145 of this Form 10-K, each of which is incorporated by reference into this Item 9A.

ITEM 9B. ITEM 9B.    OTHER INFORMATION

None.

75

 None.



Table of ContentsPART III

ITEM
10.
PART III

ITEM 10.    DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS, AND CORPORATE GOVERANCE

The information required to be furnished pursuant to Item 10 with respect to directors, executive officers, code of ethics, and audit committee and audit committee financial experts is incorporated herein by reference from the section entitled "Governance“Governance of the Company"Company” and "Election“Election of Directors"Directors” in our Proxy Statement for the 20162018 Annual Meeting of Shareholders,Stockholders, which we will file with the Securities and Exchange Commission no later than 120 days after the end of our fiscal year.

ITEM 11.    EXECUTIVEEXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

The information required to be furnished pursuant to Item 11 with respect to executive compensation is incorporated herein by reference from the section entitled "Executive Compensation"“Executive Compensation  and Related Information” in our Proxy Statement for the 20162018 Annual Meeting of Shareholders,Stockholders, which we will file with the Securities and Exchange Commission no later than 120 days after the end of our fiscal year.

ITEM 12.    SECURITYSECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS

The information relating to security ownership of certain beneficial owners and management required by Item 12 is incorporated herein by reference from the section entitled "Information on“Security Ownership of Directors and Executive Officers"Officers” and “Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners” in our Proxy Statement for the 20162018 Annual Meeting of Shareholders,Stockholders, which we will file with the Securities and Exchange Commission no later than 120 days after the end of our fiscal year. The Equity Compensation Plan Information required by Item 12 is set forth in the table below.

Equity Compensation Plan Information

Our stockholders approved theSteel Dynamics, Inc. 2015 Equity Incentive Plan at our annual meeting of stockholders held May 21, 2015 (2015 Plan). Our stockholders approved theSteel Dynamics, Inc. 2013 Equity Incentive Compensation Plan (2013 Plan) at our annual meeting of stockholders held May 16, 2013. The following table summarizes information about our equity compensation plans at December 31, 2015:2017:



 

 

 

 



(a)

(b)

(c)

Plan Category

 

Number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options, warrants and rights

Weighted‑average

exercise price of outstanding options, warrants and rights (1)

Number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation
plans (excluding securities
reflected in column (a))

Equity compensation plans approved by security holders:

  2015 Plan, and Predecessor 2006 Plan.......

2,351,600 $31.57 5,335,377 

    2013 Plan....................................................

195,322 

2,034,230 

Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders..............................................

 
 (a)
 (b)
 (c)
 
Plan Category
 Number of securities
to be issued upon
exercise of
outstanding options,
warrants and rights
 Weighted-average
exercise price of
outstanding options,
warrants and
rights(1)
 Number of securities
remaining available for
future issuance under
equity compensation
plans (excluding
securities reflected in
column (a))
 

Equity compensation plans approved by security holders:

          

2015 Plan, and Predecessor 2006 Plan

  3,386,753 $14.43  9,094,571 

2013 Plan

  151,074    2,268,635 

Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders

       

(1)

The weighted average exercise price for the 2015 Plan (and 2006 Predecessor Plan) does not take into account 1,413,145 RSU’s, 216,568 DSU’s, and 435,907 LTIP’s issuable upon expiration of the vesting or deferral periods, which have no exercise price.


(1)
The weighted average exercise price for the 2015 Plan (and 2006 Predecessor Plan) does not take into account 2,278,704 RSU's, 201,684 DSU's, and 310,242 LTIP's issuable upon expiration of the vesting or deferral periods, which have no exercise price.

ITEM

Table of Contents13.

ITEM 13.    CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE

The information required to be furnished pursuant to Item 13 with respect to certain relationships and related transactions is incorporated herein by reference from the sectionsections entitled "Certain Relationships“Statement of Policy for the Review, Approval or Ratification of Transactions with Related Persons,” and Related Transactions"“Governance of the Company – Director Independence” in our Proxy Statement for the 20162018 Annual Meeting of Shareholders,Stockholders, which we will file with the Securities and Exchange Commission no later than 120 days after the end of our fiscal year.year; and from Note 10 Transactions with Affiliated Companies to our consolidated financial statements as of December 31, 2017 and 2016, and each of the three years in the periods ended December 31, 2017, 2016, and 2015, included in Item 8 of this Form 10-K Annual Report for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2017. 

ITEM 14. ITEM 14.    PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES

The information required to be furnished pursuant to Item 14 with respect to principal accountant fees and services is incorporated herein by reference from the sectionsections entitled "Principal Accounting Fees“Audit and Services"Non-Audit Fees” and “Policy on Audit Committee Pre-Approval of Audit and Permissible Non-Audit Services of Independent Auditor” in our Proxy Statement for the 20162018 Annual Meeting of Shareholders,Stockholders, which we will file with the Securities and Exchange Commission no later than 120 days after the end of our fiscal year.


76

Table of Contents


PART IV

ITEM
15.
PART IV

ITEM 15.    EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES

(a)

The following documents are filed as a part of this report:

1.

Financial Statements: See the Audited Consolidated Financial Statements of Steel Dynamics Inc. included as part of Item 8 and described in the Index on page 5942 of this Report.

2.

Financial Statement Schedules: All schedules for which provision is made in the applicable regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission are not required under the related instructions or are inapplicable and therefore have been omitted.

(b)

Exhibits:

Reference is made to the Exhibit Index preceding the signature pages hereto, which Exhibit Index is hereby incorporated into this item.

ITEM 16.FORM 10-K SUMMARY

None.

Articles of Incorporation
3.1aAmended and Restated Articles of Incorporation of Steel Dynamics, Inc., incorporated herein by reference from Exhibit 3.1a to our Registration Statement on Form S-1, SEC File No. 333-12521, effective November 21, 1996.
3.1bAmendment to Article IV of the Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation of Steel Dynamics, Inc., effective November 2, 2006, increasing the authorized shares to 200 million, incorporated herein by reference from Exhibit 3.1b to our report on Form 10-Q filed May 7, 2008.
3.1cAmendment to Article IV of the Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation of Steel Dynamics, Inc., effective March 27, 2008, increasing the authorized common shares to 400 million, incorporated herein by reference from Exhibit 3.1c to our report on Form 10-Q, filed May 7, 2008.
3.1dAmendment to Article IV of the Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation of Steel Dynamics, Inc., effective June 2, 2009, increasing the authorized common shares to 900 million, incorporated herein by reference from Exhibit 3.1 to our Form 8-K filed June 2, 2009.
3.2aAmended and Restated Bylaws of Steel Dynamics, Inc., incorporated herein by reference from Exhibit 3.1 to our Form 8-K filed July 6, 2006.
3.2bAmendment adding Section 3.15 to Amended and Restated Bylaws of Steel Dynamics, Inc., incorporated herein by reference from Exhibit��99.1 to our Form 8-K filed August 6, 2009.
Instruments Defining the Rights of Security Holders, Including Indentures
4.17Indenture relating to our issuance of $400 million of 61/8% Senior Notes due 2019, and $350 million of 63/8% Senior Notes due 2022 among Steel Dynamics,  Inc., as Issuer, the Initial Subsidiary Guarantors, and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Trustee, dated as of August 16, 2012, incorporated herein by reference from Exhibit 4.17 to our Form 8-K filed August 20, 2012.
4.20Indenture relating to our issuance of $400 million of 51/4% Senior Notes due 2023, among Steel Dynamics, Inc., as Issuer, the Initial Subsidiary Guarantors, and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Trustee, dated as of March 26, 2013, incorporated herein by reference from Exhibit 4.20 to our Form 8-K filed March 23, 2013.


Table of Contents77


4.23Indenture dated September 9, 2014, relating to the 5.125% Senior Notes due 2021, among Steel Dynamics, Inc., as Issuer, the Initial Subsidiary Guarantors named therein, and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Trustee, incorporated herein by reference from Exhibit 4.23 to our Form 8-K filed September 12, 2014.
4.24Indenture dated September 9, 2014, relating to the 5.500% Senior Notes due 2024, among Steel Dynamics, Inc., as Issuer, the Initial Subsidiary Guarantors named therein, and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Trustee, incorporated herein by reference from Exhibit 4.24 to our Form 8-K filed September 12, 2014.
Material Contracts
10.12Loan Agreement between Indiana Development Finance Authority and Steel Dynamics, Inc. re Taxable Economic Development Revenue bonds, Trust Indenture between Indiana Development Finance Authority and NBD Bank, N.A., as Trustee re Loan Agreement between Indiana Development Finance Authority and Steel Dynamics, Inc., incorporated herein by reference from Exhibit 10.12 to Registrant's Registration Statement on Form S-1, File No. 333-12521, effective November 21, 1996.
10.20Steel Dynamics, Inc., Change in Control Benefit Plan, incorporated herein by reference to our 8-K filed December 4, 2012.
10.41bAmended and Restated Steel Dynamics, Inc. 2006 Equity Incentive Plan, as approved by shareholders on May 17, 2012, incorporated herein by reference from our Exhibit 10.41b to our 8-K filed August 21, 2012.
10.41cSteel Dynamics, Inc. Long-Term Incentive Compensation Program, adopted August 15, 2012, incorporated herein by reference from our Exhibit 10.41c to our 8-K filed August 21, 2012.
10.52Director Agreement between the Company and Keith E. Busse, dated October 14, 2011, incorporated herein by reference from Exhibit 10.52 to our Form 8-K filed October 20, 2011.
10.532013 Executive Incentive Compensation Plan, approved by stockholders on May 16, 2013, incorporated herein by reference from our May 16, 2013, Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholders filed March 27, 2013.
10.54Second Amended and Restated Credit Agreement dated as of November 14, 2014, Among Steel Dynamics, Inc. as Borrower and the Initial Lenders, Initial Issuing Bank and Swing Line Bank Named or Described Herein as Initial Lenders, Initial Issuing Banks and Swing Line Bank, and PNC Bank, National Association as Collateral Agent, PNC Bank, National Association as Administrative Agent, and Bank of America, N.A. and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association as Syndication Agents, and Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated, PNC Capital Markets LLC and Wells Fargo Securities, LLC, as Joint Lead Arrangers and Joint Bookrunners, and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., Citizens Bank, N.A., Morgan Stanley Senior Funding, Inc. and Sun Trust Bank, as Documentation Agents, incorporated herein by reference from Exhibit 10.54 to our Form 8-K filed November 20, 2014.
10.55Steel Dynamics, Inc. 2014 Employee Stock Purchase Plan, incorporated herein by reference from our May 15, 2014, Notice of Annual Meeting and Stockholders filed March 27, 2014.


EXHIBIT INDEX

Articles of Incorporation

3.1aTableAmended and Restated Articles of ContentsIncorporation of Steel Dynamics, Inc., incorporated herein by reference from Exhibit 3.1a to our Registration Statement on Form S-1, SEC File No. 333-12521, effective November 21, 1996.

3.1bAmendment to Article IV of the Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation of Steel Dynamics, Inc., effective November 2, 2006, increasing the authorized shares to 200 million, incorporated herein by reference from Exhibit 3.1b to our report on Form 10-Q filed May 7, 2008.

3.1cAmendment to Article IV of the Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation of Steel Dynamics, Inc., effective March 27, 2008, increasing the authorized common shares to 400 million, incorporated herein by reference from Exhibit 3.1c to our report on Form 10-Q, filed May 7, 2008.

3.1dAmendment to Article IV of the Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation of Steel Dynamics, Inc., effective June 2, 2009, increasing the authorized common shares to 900 million, incorporated herein by reference from Exhibit 3.1 to our Form 8-K filed June 2, 2009.

3.2aAmended and Restated Bylaws of Steel Dynamics, Inc., incorporated herein by reference from Exhibit 3.1 to our Form 8-K filed July 6, 2006.

3.2bAmendment adding Section 3.15 to Amended and Restated Bylaws of Steel Dynamics, Inc., incorporated herein by reference from Exhibit 3.2b to our Form 10-Q filed August 7, 2009.

3.2cAmendment replacing Article XI of the Amended and Restated Bylaws of Steel Dynamics, Inc., incorporated herein by reference from Exhibit 3.2c to our Form 10-Q filed November 9, 2017.

Instruments Defining the Rights of Security Holders, Including Indentures

4.20Indenture relating to our issuance of $400 million of 51/4% Senior Notes due 2023, among Steel Dynamics, Inc., as Issuer, the Initial Subsidiary Guarantors, and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Trustee, dated as of March 26, 2013, incorporated herein by reference from Exhibit 4.20 to our Form 8-K filed March 28, 2013.

4.23Indenture dated September 9, 2014, relating to our issuance of $700 million of 5.125% Senior Notes due 2021, among Steel Dynamics, Inc., as Issuer, the Initial Subsidiary Guarantors named therein, and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Trustee, incorporated herein by reference from Exhibit 4.23 to our Form 8-K filed September 12, 2014.

4.24Indenture dated September 9, 2014, relating to our issuance of $500 million 5.500% Senior Notes due 2024, among Steel Dynamics, Inc., as Issuer, the Initial Subsidiary Guarantors named therein, and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Trustee, incorporated herein by reference from Exhibit 4.24 to our Form 8-K filed September 12, 2014.

4.27Indenture dated December 6, 2016, relating to our issuance of $400 million 5.000% Senior Notes due 2026, among Steel Dynamics, Inc., as Issuer, the Initial Subsidiary Guarantors named therein, and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Trustee, incorporated herein by reference from Exhibit 4.27 to our Form 8-K filed December 8, 2016.

4.30Indenture dated September 13, 2017, relating to our issuance of $350 million 4.125% Senior Notes due 2025, among Steel Dynamics, Inc., as Issuer, the Initial Subsidiary Guarantors named therein, and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Trustee, incorporated herein by reference from Exhibit 4.30 to our Form 8-K filed September 13, 2017.

78


10.56Membership Interest Purchase Agreement by and among Severstal Columbus Holdings, LLC, Severstal Columbus, LLC and Steel Dynamics, Inc., dated as of July 18, 2014, incorporated herein by reference from Exhibit 2.1 to our 8-K filed July 18, 2014.
10.572015 Equity Incentive Plan, as approved by shareholders on May 21, 2015, incorporated herein by reference from our May 21, 2015, Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholders filed March 30, 2015.
Other
12.1*Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges
21.1*List of our Subsidiaries
23.1*Consent of Ernst & Young LLP.
24.1Powers of attorney (see signature pages on pages 110 and 111 of this Report).
95*Mine Safety Disclosures
Executive Officer Certifications
31.1*Certification of Chief Executive Officer required by Item 307 of Regulation S-K as promulgated by the Securities and Exchange Commission and pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
31.2*Certification of Chief Financial Officer required by Item 307 of Regulation S-K as promulgated by the Securities and Exchange Commission and pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
32.1*Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
32.2*Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
XBRL Documents
101.INS*XBRL Instance Document
101.SCH*XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document
101.CAL*XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Document
101.DEF*XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Document
101.LAB*XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Document
101.PRE*XBRL Taxonomy Presentation Document

Material Contracts

10.2Loan Agreement between Indiana Development Finance Authority and Steel Dynamics, Inc. re Taxable Economic Development Revenue bonds, Trust Indenture between Indiana Development Finance Authority and NBD Bank, N.A., as Trustee Loan Agreement between Indiana Development Finance Authority and Steel Dynamics, Inc., incorporated herein by reference from Exhibit 10.12 to Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form S-1, File No. 333-12521, effective November 21, 1996.

10.20†Steel Dynamics, Inc., Change in Control Benefit Plan, incorporated herein by reference from our Exhibit10.20 to our 8-K filed December 4, 2012.

10.41b†Amended and Restated Steel Dynamics, Inc. 2006 Equity Incentive Plan, as approved by shareholders on May 17, 2012, incorporated herein by reference from our Exhibit 10.41b to our 8-K filed August 21, 2012.

10.41c†Steel Dynamics, Inc. Long-Term Incentive Compensation Program, adopted August 15, 2012, incorporated herein by reference from our Exhibit 10.41c to our 8-K filed August 21, 2012.

10.52†Director Agreement between the Company and Keith E. Busse, dated October 14, 2011, incorporated herein by reference from Exhibit 10.52 to our Form 8-K filed October 20, 2011.

10.53†2013 Executive Incentive Compensation Plan, approved by stockholders on May 16, 2013, incorporated herein by reference from our May 16, 2013, Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholders filed March 27, 2013.

10.54Second Amended and Restated Credit Agreement dated as of November 14, 2014, Among Steel Dynamics, Inc. as Borrower and  the Initial Lenders, Initial Issuing Bank and Swing Line Bank Named or Described Herein as Initial Lenders, Initial Issuing Banks and Swing Line Bank, and  PNC Bank, National Association as Collateral Agent, PNC Bank, National Association as Administrative Agent, and Bank of America, N.A. and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association as Syndication Agents, and Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated, PNC Capital Markets LLC and Wells Fargo Securities, LLC, as Joint Lead Arrangers and Joint Bookrunners, and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., Citizens Bank, N.A., Morgan Stanley Senior Funding, Inc. and Sun Trust Bank, as Documentation Agents, incorporated herein by reference from Exhibit 10.54 to our Form 8-K filed November 20, 2014.

10.55†Steel Dynamics, Inc. 2014 Employee Stock Purchase Plan, incorporated herein by reference from our May 15, 2014, Notice of Annual Meeting and Stockholders filed March 27, 2014.

10.57†2015 Equity Incentive Plan, as approved by shareholders on May 21, 2015, incorporated herein by reference from our May 21, 2015, Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholders filed March 30, 2015.

79


Other

12.1*Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges

21.1*List of our Subsidiaries

23.1*Consent of Ernst & Young LLP.

24.1Powers of attorney (see signature pages on pages 81 and 82 of this Report).

95   **Mine Safety Disclosures

Executive Officer Certifications

31.1*Certification of Chief Executive Officer required by Item 307 of Regulation S-K as promulgated by the Securities and Exchange Commission and pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes‑Oxley Act of 2002.

31.2*Certification of Chief Financial Officer required by Item 307 of Regulation S-K as promulgated by the Securities and Exchange Commission and pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes‑Oxley Act of 2002.

32.1*Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes‑Oxley Act of 2002.

32.2*Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes‑Oxley Act of 2002.

XBRL Documents

101.INS*   XBRL Instance Document

101.SCH*  XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document

101.CAL*  XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Document

101.DEF*  XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Document

101.LAB*  XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Document

101.PRE*   XBRL Taxonomy Presentation Document

*

Filed concurrently herewith

**Inapplicable for purposes of this report

Indicates a management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement.

Table of Contents


SIGNATURES
80

 


SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of Securities Exchange Act of 1934, Steel Dynamics, Inc. has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

February 26, 2016
27, 2018

STEEL DYNAMICS, INC.

By:

By:/s/ Mark D. Millett

/s/ MARK D. MILLETT


Mark D. Millett

Chief Executive Officer

(Principal Executive Officer)


POWER OF ATTORNEY

Each person whose signature appears below constitutes and appoints Mark D. Millett and Theresa E. Wagler, either of whom may act without the joinder of the other, as his true and lawful attorneys-in-fact and agents with full power of substitution and resubstitution, for him, and in his name, place and stead, in any and all capacities to sign any and all amendments, and supplements to this 20152017 Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and to file the same, with all exhibits thereto, and all other documents in connection therewith, with the Securities and Exchange Commission, granting unto said attorneys-in-fact and agents full power and authority to do and performs each and every act and thing requisite and necessary to be done, as full to all intents and purposes as he might or could do in person, hereby ratifying and confirming all that said attorneys-in-fact and agents or their substitute or substitutes may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue thereof.Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this 20152017 Annual Report on Form 10-K has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of Steel Dynamics, Inc. and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

Signatures
Title
Date





Signatures

Title

Date

/s/ MARK D. MILLETT


Mark D. Millett

Chief Executive Officer and Director (Principal

February 27, 2018

Mark D. Millett

(Principal Executive Officer)

February 26, 2016


/s/ THERESA E. WAGLER


Theresa E. Wagler



Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (Principal

February 27, 2018

Theresa E. Wagler

(Principal Financial Officer and

Principal Accounting Officer)



February 26, 2016


/s/ KEITH E. BUSSE

Director

February 27, 2018

Keith E. Busse

/s/ FRANK D. BYRNE, M.D.

Director

February 27, 2018

Frank D. Byrne, M.D.

/s/ KENNETH W. CORNEW

Director

February 27, 2018

Kenneth W. Cornew

/s/ TRACI M. DOLAN

Director

February 27, 2018

Traci M. Dolan

/s/ DR. JÜRGEN KOLB

Director

February 27, 2018

Dr. Jürgen Kolb

/s/ JAMES C. MARCUCCILLI

Director

February 27, 2018

James C. Marcuccilli

81


/s/ BRADLEY S. SEAMAN

Director

February 27, 2018

Bradley S. Seaman

/s/ GABRIEL L. SHAHEEN

Director

February 27, 2018

Gabriel L. Shaheen

/s/ RICHARD P. TEETS, JR.


Director

February 27, 2018

Richard P. Teets, Jr.



Executive Vice President and Director


February 26, 2016

/s/ JOHN C. BATES

John C. Bates


Director


February 26, 2016


Table of Contents

82


Signatures
Title
Date





/s/ KEITH E. BUSSE

Keith E. Busse
DirectorFebruary 26, 2016

/s/ DR. FRANK BYRNE

Dr. Frank Byrne


Director


February 26, 2016

/s/ TRACI M. DOLAN

Traci M. Dolan


Director


February 26, 2016

/s/ DR. JÜRGEN KOLB

Dr. Jürgen Kolb


Director


February 26, 2016

/s/ JAMES C. MARCUCCILLI

James C. Marcuccilli


Director


February 26, 2016

/s/ BRADLEY S. SEAMAN

Bradley S. Seaman


Director


February 26, 2016

/s/ GABRIEL L. SHAHEEN

Gabriel L. Shaheen


Director


February 26, 2016