Use these links to rapidly review the document
TABLE OF CONTENTS
C O N T E N T S

Table of Contents


UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K

(Mark One)
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-K
(Mark One)

ýx


ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2022
or

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2019

or

o


TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 orOR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from                                to                               

For the transition period from to
Commission file number: 001-38647

FVCBankcorp, Inc.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Virginia
47-5020283
(State or other jurisdiction
of
incorporation or organization)
47-5020283
(I.R.S. Employer

Identification No.)

11325 Random Hills Road, Suite 240
Fairfax, Virginia
22030
(Address of principal executive offices)

22030
(Zip Code)

Registrant's telephone number, including area code:(703) 436-3800

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

Title of Each Class:Trading Symbol(s)Name of Each Exchange on Which Registered:
Common Stock, $0.01 par valueFVCBThe Nasdaq Stock Market, LLC

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:None

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes o¨ No ý

x

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes o¨ No ý

x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ýx No o

¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit such files). Yes ýx No o

¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of "large accelerated filer," "accelerated filer," "smaller reporting company," and "emerging growth company" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filer o
Accelerated filer ýo
Non-accelerated filer ox
Smaller reporting companyý

x

Emerging growth company ý

x

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ý

x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed a report on and attestation to its management's assessment of the effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting under Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (15 U.S.C. 7262(b)) by the registered public accounting firm that prepared or issued its audit report. ¨

If securities are registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act, indicate by check mark whether the financial statements of the registrant included in the filing reflect the correction of an error to previously issued financial statements. o
Indicate by check mark whether any of those error corrections are restatements that required a recovery analysis of incentive-based compensation received by any of the registrant’s executive officers during the relevant recovery period pursuant to §240.10D-1(b). o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). Yes o¨ No ý

x

State the aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common equity held by non-affiliates computed by reference to the price at which the common equity was last sold as of June 30, 2019: $235,481,152.

2022: $237,799,174.

The number of shares outstanding of Common Stock, as of March 18, 2020,17, 2023, was 13,467,955.

17,674,224.

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

Portions of the registrant's definitive Proxy Statement for the 20202023 Annual Meeting of Shareholders are incorporated by reference into Part III of the Form 10-K. With the exception of the portions of the Proxy Statement specifically incorporated herein by reference, the Proxy Statement is not deemed to be filed as part of this Form 10-K.



TABLE OF CONTENTS

PART I

PART I


Item 1.



Business





1


Item 1A.

1.

5


Risk Factors





21



Unresolved Staff Comments





Item 2.


32


Properties





42


Item 3.



Legal Proceedings





Item 4.



Mine Safety Disclosures





42

36




Item 5.



Market for Registrant's Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities





Item 6.


[Reserved]
39


Selected Financial Data





45


Item 7.



Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations





Item 7A.



Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk





Item 8.



Financial Statements and Supplementary Data





Item 9.



Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure





Item 9A.



Controls and Procedures





Item 9B.



Other Information





PART III


114


Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance





Item 11.



Executive Compensation





Item 12.



Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters





Item 13.



Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence





Item 14.



Principal AccountingAccountant Fees and Services





Part



Item 15.



Exhibits,Exhibit and Financial Statement Schedules





137

115
2

Cautionary Note About Forward-Looking Statements
This Annual Report on Form 10-K, as well as other periodic reports filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, and written or oral communications made from time to time by or on behalf of FVCBankcorp, Inc. and its subsidiary (the "Company"), may contain statements relating to future events or future results of the Company that are considered "forward-looking statements" under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These forward-looking statements represent plans, estimates, objectives, goals, guidelines, expectations, intentions, projections and statements of our beliefs concerning future events, business plans, objectives, expected operating results and the assumptions upon which those statements are based. Forward-looking statements include without limitation, any statement that may predict, forecast, indicate or imply future results, performance or achievements, and are typically identified with words such as "may," "could," "should," "will," "would," "believe," "anticipate," "estimate," "expect," "aim," "intend," "plan," or words or phases of similar meaning. We caution that the forward-looking statements are based largely on our expectations and are subject to a number of known and unknown risks and uncertainties that are subject to change based on factors which are, in many instances, beyond our control. Actual results, performance or achievements could differ materially from those contemplated, expressed or implied by the forward-looking statements.
The following factors, among others, could cause our financial performance to differ materially from that expressed in such forward-looking statements:
general business and economic conditions nationally or in the markets that the Company serves could adversely affect, among other things, real estate valuations, unemployment levels, inflation levels, the ability of businesses to remain viable, consumer and business confidence, and consumer or business spending, which could lead to decreases in demand for loans, deposits, and other financial services that the Company provides and increases in loan delinquencies and defaults;
the risk of changes in interest rates on levels, composition and costs of deposits, loan demand, and the values and liquidity of loan collateral, securities, and interest sensitive assets and liabilities;
changes in the Company's liquidity requirements could be adversely affected by changes in its assets and liabilities;
changes in the assumptions underlying the establishment of reserves for possible loan losses;
changes in market conditions, specifically declines in the commercial and residential real estate market, volatility and disruption of the capital and credit markets, and soundness of other financial institutions we do business with;
the effects of, and changes in, trade, monetary and fiscal policies and laws, including interest rate policies of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, inflation, interest rate, market and monetary fluctuations;
risks inherent in making loans such as repayment risks and fluctuating collateral values;
the Company's investment securities portfolio is subject to credit risk, market risk, and liquidity risk as well as changes in the estimates used to value the securities in the portfolio;
declines in the Company's common stock price or the occurrence of what management would deem to be a triggering event that could, under certain circumstances, cause us to record a noncash impairment charge to earnings in future periods;
the strength of the United States economy in general and the strength of the local economies in which we conduct operations;
geopolitical conditions, including acts or threats of terrorism, or actions taken by the United States or other governments in response to acts or threats of terrorism and/or military conflicts, which could impact business and economic conditions in the United States and abroad;
the occurrence of significant natural disasters, including severe weather conditions, floods, health related issues or emergencies, including the COVID-19 pandemic, and other catastrophic events;
3

our management of risks inherent in our real estate loan portfolio, and the risk of a prolonged downturn in the real estate market, which could impair the value of our collateral and our ability to sell collateral upon any foreclosure;
changes in consumer spending and savings habits;
technological and social media changes;
changing bank regulatory conditions, policies or programs, whether arising as new legislation or regulatory initiatives, that could lead to restrictions on activities of banks generally, or our subsidiary bank in particular, more restrictive regulatory capital requirements, increased costs, including deposit insurance premiums, regulation or prohibition of certain income producing activities or changes in the secondary market for loans and other products;
the impact of changes in financial services policies, laws and regulations, including laws, regulations and policies concerning taxes, banking, securities and insurance, and the application thereof by regulatory bodies;
the impact of changes in laws, regulations and policies affecting the real estate industry;
the effect of changes in accounting policies and practices, as may be adopted from time to time by bank regulatory agencies, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board, the Financial Accounting Standards Board or other accounting standards setting bodies;
the timely development of competitive new products and services and the acceptance of these products and services by new and existing customers;
the willingness of users to substitute competitors' products and services for our products and services;
the effect of acquisitions we may make, including, without limitation, the failure to achieve the expected revenue growth and/or expense savings from such acquisitions;
changes in the level of our nonperforming assets and charge-offs;
our involvement, from time to time, in legal proceedings and examination and remedial actions by regulators; and
potential exposure to fraud, negligence, computer theft and cyber-crime.
The foregoing factors should not be considered exhaustive and should be read together with other cautionary statements that are included in this Form 10-K, including those discussed in the section entitled "Risk Factors" in Item 1A below. If one or more of the factors affecting our forward-looking information and statements proves incorrect, then our actual results, performance or achievements could differ materially from those expressed in, or implied by, forward-looking information and statements contained in this Form 10-K. Therefore, we caution you not to place undue reliance on our forward-looking information and statements. We will not update the forward-looking statements to reflect actual results or changes in the factors affecting the forward-looking statements. New risks and uncertainties may emerge from time to time, and it is not possible for us to predict their occurrence or how they will affect us.
4

PART I

Item 1. Business

Overview

        FVCBankcorp, Inc. (the "Company")

The Company is a registered bank holding company headquartered in Fairfax, Virginia. We operate primarily through our sole subsidiary, FVCbank, (the "Bank"), a community oriented, locally-owned and managed commercial bank organized under the laws of the Commonwealth of Virginia. We serve the banking needs of commercial businesses, nonprofit organizations, professional service entities, and their respective owners and employees located in the greater Washington, D.C. and Baltimore metropolitan areas. The Company was established as the holding company for the Bank in 2015.

Since the Bank began operations in November 2007, on the cusp of the most significant economic downturn since the Great Depression, it has grown largely organically, throughde novo branch expansion, and banker and customer acquisition, and two whole-bank acquisitions. In 2012, we completed the acquisition of 1st Commonwealth Bank of Virginia ("1st1st Commonwealth"), a $58.9 million asset savings and loan association in Arlington, Virginia.

On October 12, 2018, we announced the completion ofcompleted our acquisition of Colombo Bank ("Colombo"), pursuant to a previously announced definitive merger agreement. Colombo, which was headquartered in Rockville, Maryland, merged into FVCbank effective October 12, 2018 addingand added five banking locations in Washington, D.C., and Montgomery County and the City of Baltimore in Maryland. Pursuant to the terms of the merger agreement, based on the average closing price of the Company's common stock during the five trading day period ended on October 10, 2018, the second trading day prior to closing, of $19.614 (the Average Closing Price") holders of shares of Colombo common stock received 0.002217 shares of the Company's common stock and $0.053157 in cash for each share of Colombo common stock held immediately prior to the effective date of the merger, plus cash in lieu of fractional shares at a rate equal to the Average Closing Price, and subject to the right of holders of Colombo common stock who owned fewer than 45,086 shares of Colombo common stock after aggregation of all shares held in the same name, and who made a timely election, to receive only cash in an amount equal to $0.096649 per share of Colombo common stock. As a result of the merger, 763,051 shares of the Company's common stock were issued in exchange for outstanding shares of Colombo common stock.

Our acquisition of Colombo supportssupported our current business and allowedallowing us to expand our presence in adjacent markets where we lend, but in which we had no physical presence. Colombo's branch locations strengthenstrengthened our strategy as they enableenabled us to add lenders and banking services in areas where we currently lend. We expect that ourOur strong infrastructure and wide range of products and services will allowallowed us to develop deeper relationships with Colombo's current customers, as well as enhance our platform for generating new relationships.

On August 31, 2021, we announced that the Bank made an investment in Atlantic Coast Mortgage, LLC ("ACM") for $20.4 million to obtain a 28.7% ownership interest in ACM. This ownership interest is subject to an earnback option of up to 3.7% over the next three years. As of December 31, 2022, our percentage ownership had decreased to 27.7%. In addition, the Bank provides a warehouse lending facility to ACM, which includes a construction-to-permanent financing line, and has developed portfolio mortgage products to diversify our held to investment loan portfolio.
Market Area

We operate in one of the most economically dynamic and wealthy regions of the Washington and Baltimore Metropolitan Statistical Areas ("MSA"), focusing primarily on the Virginia counties of Arlington, Fairfax, Loudoun and Prince William and the independent cities located within those counties, as well as Washington, D.C. and its Maryland suburbs and Baltimore, Maryland and its surrounding suburbs. As of June 30, 2019,2022, the Washington MSA had total deposits of $220.7$297.1 billion excluding deposits maintained by a national brokerage firm. Theand the Baltimore MSA had total deposits of $74.3$104.6 billion, as of June 30, 2019 based on FDICFederal Deposit Insurance Corporation ("FDIC") data.

Our market area's unemployment rate has generally remained below the national average for the last several years. While the region continues to experience the economic effects of the COVID-19 pandemic, the region's unemployment rate remained below the national average as the region has the benefit of a highly trained and educated workforce concentrated in government and professional service businesses. These factors, along with the ability of the regional infrastructure to support remote working, have provided a greater amount of resiliency during the pandemic on the overall employment metrics for our market.
In addition to the presence of the federal government, the Washington MSA is defined by attractive market demographics, including strong household incomes, dense populations and the


Table of Contents

presence of a diverse group of large and small businesses. According to the U.S. Census Bureau, the region is home to four of the top ten most highly educated counties in the nation and four to the top ten most affluent counties, as measured by household income. As of December 31, 2018,2020, the Washington MSA had a median household income of $102,180,$106,415, which ranks as sixth highest among all metropolitan statistical areasMSAs nationally, and a population of 6.26.3 million. The Virginia and Maryland localities within the Washington MSA in which we primarily operate have higher median household incomes than the Washington MSA as a whole and have an unemployment rate of 2.6%2.8% as of December 2019.2022. The significant presence of national and international businesses make

5

the Washington MSA one of the most economically vibrant and diverse markets in the country. The Washington MSA is currently home to 1516 Fortune 500 companies, including eight based in Fairfax County.

The Baltimore MSA also has strong economic factors which enhance our business profile. As of December 31, 2018,2020, the Baltimore MSA had a median household income of $80,469$83,811 which represented 4%3.3% growth over the previous year. The Baltimore MSA has an unemployment rate of 2.9%3.1% as of December 2019.2022. With a population of 2.8 million, the top industries of the Baltimore MSA include health care, education, and professional, scientific and technical services.

Our business, financial condition, and results of operations have been profoundly affected by the pandemic, which will potentially have adverse effects on our future performance. Both globally and within the United States, the pandemic has resulted in negative impacts and a disruption to economic and commercial activity and financial markets. The local economy in which we operate began to strengthen and improve during 2021 and continued into 2022. This economic improvement resulted in lower unemployment, increased consumer confidence, and increased housing development and housing prices. However, our business opportunities may be tempered by concerns related to inflation, the cessation of pandemic-related government stimulus, and contractionary monetary policy. Volatility in global economic markets, continued domestic political turmoil and various episodes of geopolitical unrest continue to provide a degree of uncertainty in financial markets. Aside from these challenges, we continue to be encouraged by the resiliency of the current economic environment and the prospects for continued growth of the Company.
Growth Strategy

Our approach features competitive customized financial services offered to customers and prospects in a personal relationship context by seasoned professionals. We provide a full range of banking services that become integral to our customers' business operations, which helps to enhance our ability to retain our relationships. We offer a better value proposition to our customers by providing high-touch service with few added fees. Our capabilities and reputation enable us to be selective in loan and customer selection, which contributes to our strong asset quality, and our ability to provide multiple services to customers.

We intend to continue expanding our market position through organic growth, through expansion of our relationships with our existing customers, acquisition of new customers and acquisition of seasoned bankers with strong customer relationships, through selective branching, and potentially opportunistic acquisitions such as our acquisition of Colombo,or other strategic transactions, while increasing profitability, maintaining strong asset quality and a high level of customer service.

Our success has been driven by our mission to help our clients, communities and employees prosper. We strive to exceed our clients' expectations by delivering superior, personalized client service supported with high quality bank products and services. We invest in the growth of our employees and we give back to the communities in which we do business to foster a brighter future for everyone who lives there. Much of our early growth was the result of the active promotion by our organizing shareholders, our board of directors, our advisory board and our shareholders as many of our shareholdersthe aforementioned are customers. We receive referrals from existing customers and all employees are encouraged to promote the Company. We believe having such a large group of individuals actively promote usthe Company has and will continue to augment our ability to generate both deposits and loans through staff and management led marketing and calling campaigns. As we have grown, we have increased our reliance on management originated customer relationships, but believe that our strong network of personal, customer and shareholder relationships and referrals will continue to be a significant factor in our business development strategy.

Our vision is to be known as the number one community bank in experience and service in our community. Our passion is to provide the utmost banking experience for each of our clients, to create a positive and empowering work environment for our employees, to fulfill our obligation of corporate citizenship in the communities in which we operate and to ensure that our Bank increases profitability and grows prudently, ensuring its strength and continuity, and increasing shareholder value.


Table of Contents

Our Products and Services

We emphasize providing commercial banking services to small and medium-sized businesses, professionals, non-profit organizations and associations, and investors living and working in and near our service area. We offer retail banking services to accommodate the individual needs of both corporate customers as well as the communities we serve. We also offer online banking, mobile banking and a remote deposit service, which allows clients to facilitate and expedite deposit transactions through the use of electronic devices. A sophisticated suite of treasury management products is a key feature
6

of our client focused, relationship driven marketing. We have partnered with experienced service providers in both insurance and merchant services to further augment the products available to our customers.

Lending Products

We provide a variety of lending products to small and medium-sized businesses, including (i) commercial real estate loans; (ii) commercial construction loans; (ii) commercial loans for a variety of business purposes such as for working capital, equipment purchases, lines of credit, and government contract financing; (iii) SBASmall Business Administration ("SBA") lending; (iv) asset based lending and accounts receivable financing; (v) home equity loans, or HELOCs;home equity lines of credit; and (vi) consumer loans for constructive purposes. Through our partnership with ACM, we purchase residential mortgage loans primarily originated in our market area that meet our product criteria and pricing, to help with the diversification of our loan portfolio. Although we do not generally actively originate them, we have acquired pools of other types of loans, and we have purchased whole residential loans in our market area, student loans and other consumer loans, in order to diversify the loan portfolio, put capital to work before organic loan production requires it, and to increase margin. We may also purchase participations from other banks in our market. Any acquired loans must meet our standard underwriting requirements.

During 2020 and 2021, we participated in the SBA's Paycheck Protection Program ("PPP"), which provided forgivable loans to small businesses to enable them to maintain payroll, rehire employees who had been laid off, and cover applicable overhead. These loans are fully guaranteed by the SBA and provide for the full forgiveness of the loans during a specified forgiveness period that meet specific guidelines provided by the SBA. Loans that do not meet forgiveness criteria will enter a repayment period of either 2 or 5 years. At December 31, 2022, PPP loans totaled $2.0 million, net of fees, or 0.1% of total loans as this population continues to decline as no new originations occurred during 2022.
Commercial Real Estate Loans. Commercial real estate loans, which comprise the largest portion of the loan portfolio, are secured by both owner occupied and investor owned commercial properties, including multi-family residential real estate. Commercial real estate loans are structured using both variable and fixed rates and renegotiable rates which adjust in three to five years, with maturities of generally five to ten years. At December 31, 2019,2022, owner occupied commercial real estate loans represented 16.2%11.3% of the loan portfolio.portfolio. At December 31, 2019,2022, non-owner occupied commercial real estate loans represented approximately 37.8%39.0% of the loan portfolio and multi-family residential real estate comprised 5.2%9.4% of the portfolio. We seek to mitigate lending risks typical of this type of loan such as declines in real estate values, changes in borrower cash flow and general economic conditions. We typically require a maximum loan to value of 80% and minimum cash flow and debt service coverages, of at least 1.20 to 1.0.1.00. Personal guarantees are generally required, but may be limited. We generally require that interest rates adjust not less frequently than five years. For purposes of geographic diversification, we will also make commercial real estate loans outside of our primary and secondary markets, in an area extending south to Richmond, Virginia, and north toof Baltimore, Maryland, and between Winchester, Virginia and the Eastern Shore of Maryland.

Construction Loans. Commercial construction loans for the acquisition, development and construction of commercial real estate also comprise a significant and growing portion of the portfolio. At December 31, 2019,2022, such loans represented 17.0%8.0% of the loan portfolio. Our typicaltypical commercial construction loan involves property that will ultimately be leased to a non-owner occupant. We will finance construction projects of a speculative nature, which are well-conceived and structured with appropriate interest reserves and analyzed fully. In underwriting commercial construction loans, we consider the expected costs of the transaction, the loan to value ratio, the credit history, cash flows and liquidity of the borrower, the project and the guarantors, the debt service coverage ratios (which are stressed prior to approval), take out sources for the permanent loan or repayment of the construction loan, the reputation, experience and qualifications of the borrower, the general contractor and others involved with the project and other factors. Commercial construction loans are generally made on a variable rate basis, typically based on the Wall Street Journal Prime Rate and subject to rate floors, for


Table of Contents

terms of 12 - 24 months. Generally, we do not make commercial construction loans outside of our primary or secondary market areas.

Commercial Loans, Government Contracting. Commercial loans, excluding PPP loans, for a variety of business purposes, including working capital, equipment purchases, lines of credit, and government contract financing and asset based lending and accounts receivable financing, comprise approximately 9.0%13.2% of our loan portfolio at December 31, 2019.2022. The warehouse facility provided to ACM is also included in this loan type. We make commercial loans on a secured or unsecured basis. We generally require thethe owners, managing members, general partners and principals of the borrowing entity or that control more than 20% of the borrower to guaranty the loan, unless a combination of low leverage, significant income and debt service coverage ratios, and substantial experience in operating the business, strong management and internal controls and/or other factors are demonstrated. Commercial loans are typically made with variable or adjustable
7

rates. The cash flow of the borrower/borrower's operating business is often the principal source of debt service, with a secondary emphasis on other collateral.

We have developed a special expertise in government contract financing. We lend to government contractors or subcontractors headquartered in the Washington, D.C. metropolitan area. This area of lending encompasses lines of credit for working capital, financing of government leases, mergers and acquisition financing, and, less frequently term loans, to operating companies that recognize over 50% of their total revenues from services provided to federal government agencies or rated state and municipal governments. Our borrowers are typically engaged in technology or service businesses, but may also include construction and equipment providers, or entities working on "black""classified" projects. A government contractor borrower must have an acceptable level of eligible accounts receivable, provide appropriate security instruments perfecting our rights in the accounts receivable or other collateral, and are subject to periodic review and monitoring of their receivables, contract backlog and contract compliance. The contractor is typically required to have its primary deposit relationship with us. Advance rates will be up to 90% of prime eligible government receivables, and lower percentages depending on the nature of thethe receivables. At December 31, 2019,2022, outstanding loans to government contractors represented 28.8%40.3% of our commercial and industrial segment. Total commitments to government contractors totaled $131.6$305.1 million at December 31, 2019.2022. Government contract loans are typically made with variable or adjustable rates. Lines of credit typically have a one year term. As with other commercial loans, guarantees are typically required.

required.

Consumer Residential. We actively originate loans for residential 1-4 family trust investment purposes and HELOCs in the communities we serve in the Washington and Baltimore MSAs. In addition, we have portfolio mortgage products that we developed for use by ACM to help diversify our total loan portfolio. Our HELOCs generally have a maximum loan to value of up to 85%, however, due to the favorable economic conditions and strong residential real estate market in these markets, actual loan to values are typically lower than the maximum. We provide HELOCs asas a service to our customers and when we receive referrals from various mortgage brokers within our market area. As of December 31, 2019,2022, HELOCs comprise 5.2%1.9% of total loans. Loans originated for residential 1-4 family trust investment purposes comprise 4.9% of total loans as of December 31, 2022. While we do not typically originate residential first mortgages, we will occasionally originate a mortgage loan meeting our investment preferences presented by a mortgage broker. We have also purchased portfolios of 1-4 family residential first mortgage loans on properties primarily located in our market area for yield and diversification. At December 31, 2019, 1-4 family2022, consumer residential mortgage loans represented 3.3%18.5% of the loan portfolio.

Other Loans. We occasionally originate consumer loans both on an unsecured basis and secured by non-real estate collateral. We have also purchased pools of unsecured consumer loans and student loans from a third party for yield and diversification.

The lending activities in which we engage carry the risk that the borrowers will be unable to perform on their obligations. As such, interest rate policies of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (the "Federal Reserve") and general economic conditions, nationally and in our market areas, could have a significant impact on our results of operations. To the extent that economic conditions deteriorate including as a result of events such


Table of Contents

as the recent coronoavirus outbreak and related disruptions, business and individual borrowers may be less able to meet their obligations to us in full, in a timely manner, resulting in decreased earnings or losses. Economic conditions may also adversely affect the value and liquidity of property pledged as security for loans.

Our goal is to mitigate risks in the event of unforeseen threats to the loan portfolio as a result of economic downturn or other negative influences. Plans for mitigating inherent risks in managing loan assets include: carefully enforcing loan policies and procedures, evaluating each borrower's business plan during the underwriting process and throughout the loan term, identifying and monitoring primary and alternative sources for loan repayment, and obtaining collateral to mitigate economic loss in the event of liquidation. Specific loan reserves are established based upon credit and/or collateral risks on an individual loan basis. A risk rating system is employed to proactively estimate loss exposure and provide a measuring system for setting general and specific reserve allocations.

Our lending activities are subject to a variety of lending limits imposed by state and federal law. These limits will increase or decrease in response to increases or decreases in our level of capital. At December 31, 2019,2022, the Bank had a legal lending limit of $28.9$38.5 million. At December 31, 2019,2022, our average funded loan size outstanding, excluding PPP loans, for commercial real estate (including commercial construction) and commercial loans was $1.4$2.2 million and $228 thousand,$1.1 million, respectively. In accordance with internal lending policies, we may sell participations of loans to other banks, which allows us to manage risk involved in these loans and to meet the lending needs of our clients.

Concentrations of Credit Risk. Most of our lending is conducted with businesses and individuals in the suburbs of Washington, D.C. Our loan portfolio consists primarily of commercial real estate loans, including construction and land
8

loans, which totaled $1.04$1.25 billion and constituted 81.5%67.8% of total loans as of December 31, 2019,2022, and commercial loans, including loans to government contractors and the ACM warehouse lending facility, which totaled $115.1$243.2 million and constituted 9.0%13.2% of total loans as of December 31, 2019.2022. The geographic concentration of our loans subjects our business to the general economic conditions within our market area. The risks created by such concentrations have been considered by management in the determination of the adequacyadequacy of the allowance for loan losses. Management believes the allowance for loan losses is adequate to cover probable incurred losses in our loan portfolio as of December 31, 2019.

2022.

Comprehensive risk management practices and appropriate capital levels are essential elements of a sound commercial real estate lending program. A concentration in commercial real estate adds a dimension of risk that compounds the risk inherent in individual loans. The federal banking agencies have issued guidance governing financial institutions with concentrations in commercial real estate lending. The guidance provides that institutions that have (i) total reported loans for construction, land development, and other land which represent 100% or more of an institution's total risk-based capital; or (ii) total reported commercial real estate loans, excluding loans secured by owner-occupied commercial real estate, representing 300% or more of the institution's total risk-based capital and the institution's commercial real estate loan portfolio has increased 50% or more during the prior 36 months, are identified as having potential commercial real estate concentration risk. Institutions which are deemed to have concentrations in commercial real estate lending are expected to employ heightened levels of risk management with respect to their commercial real estate portfolios, and may be required to hold higher levels of capital. We have a concentration in commercialcommercial real estate loans, and we have experienced significant growth in our commercial real estate portfolio in recent years. As of December 31, 2019,2022, commercial real estate loans as defined for regulatory purposes represented 396.4%405% of our total risk-based capital. Of those loans, commercial construction, development and land loans represented 111.7%57% of our total risk based capital. Owner-occupied commercial real estate loans represented an additional 107.0%81% of our total risk based capital. Management has extensive experience in commercial real estate lending, and has implemented and continues to maintain heightenedheightened portfolio monitoring and reporting, and strong underwriting criteria with respect to our commercial real estate portfolio.


Table of Contents

Deposit Products

We offer a wide array of deposit products for individuals, professionals, government contractors and other businesses, including interest and noninterest-bearing transaction accounts, certificates of deposit, savings, and money market accounts. We are a relationship based bank, and maintenance of significant deposit relationships is a factor in our decision to make loans and the pricing of our products.

Our sophisticated treasury management and online banking platform allows a commercial customer to view balances, initiate payments, pay bills (including positive pay), issue stop payments, reconcile accounts and set up custom alerts. Online wires, ACH (including positive authorization), remote capture, cash disbursement and cash concentration are additional payment options available to businesses. We provideprovide customers with a sophisticated escrow management product which facilitates and simplifies management of multiple escrow balances. We also provide secure credit card processing and merchant services, with reporting tailored to customer needs. We alsoAdditionally, we offer online and mobile banking products to our consumer depositors, to complement our branch network.

Other Services

Through third party networks, we offer our customers access to a full range of business insurance products and business and consumer credit card products.

Competition

We are one of the few remaining locally owned and managed independent community banks headquartered in Northern Virginia. We believe that this is an advantageous position and valuable quality which positively differentiates us from our competitors and positions us for future growth from individuals and small and mid-sized business customers who value the attention and customized services which a locally owned and managed community bank can provide.

As of June 30, 2019,2022, there were approximately $220.7 $297.1 billion in total deposits shared between banking institutions located in the Washington MSA, according to the FDIC. As of thatthe aforementioned date, our deposit market share was approximately 0.57%, excluding deposits maintained0.64% in the Washington MSA by a national brokerage firm.MSA. Our strategic goal is to increase our market share through selective new branch additions, opportunistic acquisitions, and acquisitions of customers from larger competitors. PNC Bank, Capital One, Wells Fargo Bank, Truist Bank, and Bank of America Corporation hold the primary market shares. However, we believe these large banks generally cannot provide the same level of attention and customization of services to small
9

businesses that we seek to provide. Through correspondents, referrals to third parties with whom we have partnered, and our own capabilities, we are a full service financial provider, able to compete in substantially all areas of banking, except trust services. Additionally, we believe we provide competitively priced products, superior customer service, flexibility and responsiveness when compared to our larger competitors.

The banking business is highly competitive. We compete as a financial intermediary with other commercial banks, savings banks, credit unions, mortgage banking firms, consumer finance companies, securities brokerage firms, insurance companies, money market mutual funds, financial technology companies and other financial institutions operating in the Washington and Baltimore MSAs and elsewhere.

Our market area is a highly competitive, highly branched, banking market. Competition in our market area for loans to small and middle-market businesses and professionals, our target market, is intense and pricing is important. Several of our competitors have substantially greater resources and lending limits than we have, and offer certain services, such as extensive and established branch networks and trust services that we do not currently provide or currently expect to provide in the near future. Moreover, larger institutions operating in the Washington, D.C. metropolitan market have access to borrowed funds at a lower cost than may be available to us. Additionally, deposit competition


Table of Contents

among institutions in the market area is strong. As a result, it is possible that we may pay above market rates to attract deposits.

Risk Management

We believe that effective risk management is of primary importance. Risk management refers to the activities by which we identify, measure, monitor, evaluate and manage the risks we face in the course of our banking activities. These include liquidity, interest rate, credit, operational, compliance, regulatory, strategic, financial and reputational risk exposures. Our board of directors and management team have created a risk-conscious culture that is focused on quality growth, which starts with capable and experienced risk management teams and an infrastructure capable of addressing the evolving risks we face, as well as the changing regulatory and compliance landscape. Our risk management approach employs comprehensive policies and processes to establish robust governance. We believe a disciplined and conservative underwriting approach has been the key to our strong asset quality.

Our board of directors sets the tone at the top of our organization, adopting and overseeing the implementation of our risk management, establishing our overall risk appetite and risk management strategy. The board of directors approves our various operating policies, which include risk policies, procedures, limits, targets and reporting structured to guide decisions regarding the appropriate balance between risk and return considerations in our business. Our board of directors receives periodic reporting on the risks and control environment effectiveness and monitors risk levels in relation to the approved risk appetite. The Audit Committee of our board of directors provides primary oversight of our enterprise risk management function.

Credit risk is the risk that borrowers or counterparties will be unable or unwilling to repay their obligations in accordance with the underlying contractual terms and the risk that credit assets will suffer significant deterioration in market value. We manage and control credit risk in our loan portfolio by adhering to well-defined underwriting criteria and account administration standards established by management, and approved by the board of directors. Our written loan policies document underwriting standards, approval levels, exposure limits and other limits or standards deemed necessary and prudent. Portfolio diversification at the obligor, product and geographic levels is actively managed to mitigate concentration risk. In addition, credit risk management includes an independent credit review process that assesses compliance with policies, risk rating standards and other critical credit information. In addition to implementing risk management practices that are based upon established and sound lending practices, we adhere to sound credit principles. We evaluate our customers' borrowing needs and capacity to repay, in conjunction with their character and history. Our management and board of directors place significant focus on maintaining a healthy risk profile and ensuring sustainable growth. Our risk appetite seeks to balance the risks necessary to achieve our strategic goals while ensuring that our risks are appropriately managed and remain within our defined limits.

Our management of interest rate and liquidity risk is overseen by our Asset and Liability Committee, based on a risk management infrastructure approved by our board of directors that outlines reporting and measurement requirements. In particular, this infrastructure reviews financial performance, trends, and significant variances to budget; reviews and recommends for board approval risk limits and tolerances; reviews ongoing monitoring and reporting regarding our performance with respect to these areas of risk, including compliance with board-approved risk limits and stress-testing; ensures annual back-testing and independent validation of models at a frequency commensurate with risk level; reviews all hedging strategies and recommends changes as appropriate; reviews and recommends our contingency funding plan; establishes wholesale borrowing limits to be submitted to the board of directors or its designated committee;directors; and acts as a second line of defense in
10

reviewing information and reports submitted to the committee for the purpose of identifying, investigating, and assuring remediation, to its satisfaction, of errors or irregularities, if any.


Table of Contents

Investment Portfolio

Our investment securities portfolio is primarily maintained as an on-balance sheet contingent source of liquidity to fund loans and meet the demands of depositors. It provides additional interest income and we seek to have limited interest rate risk and credit risk. We currently classify substantially all of our investment securities as available-for-sale. Our investment policy authorizes investment primarily in securities of the U.S. government and its agencies; mortgage backbacked securities and collateralized mortgage obligations issued and fully backed by U.S. government agencies, securities of municipalities and to a lesser extent corporate bonds and other obligations, in each case meeting identified credit standards, and certificates of deposit.standards. The securities portfolio, along with certain loans, may also be used to collateralize public deposits, FHLBFederal Home Loan Bank of Atlanta ("FHLB") borrowings, and Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond ("FRB") borrowings. We manage our investment portfolio according to written investment policies approved by our board of directors. Our investment strategy aims to maximize earnings while maintaining liquidity in securities with minimal credit risk and interest rate risk which is reflective in the yields obtained on those securities.

Employees

As of December 31, 2019,2022, we had 124131 full-time equivalentemployees and 4 part-time employees. NoneNone of our employees are covered by a collective bargaining agreement. We consider our relationship with our employees to be good and have not experienced interruptions of operations due to labor disagreements.


Additional Information
Our common stock is currently listed on the Nasdaq Capital Market under the symbol "FVCB." We maintain a website at www.fvcbank.com.
We make available free of charge through our website all of our U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") filings, including our annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K and amendments to those reports, as soon as reasonably practicable after electronically filing or furnishing such material to the SEC at www.sec.gov. Information on our website does not constitute part of, and is not incorporated into, this report or any other filing we make with the SEC.
SUPERVISION AND REGULATION

Our business and operations are subject to extensive federal and state governmental regulation and supervision. The following is a brief summary of certain statutes and rules and regulations that affect or may affect us. This summary is not intended to be an exhaustive description of the statutes or regulations applicable to our business. Supervision, regulation, and examination of the Company by the regulatory agencies are intended primarily for the protection of depositors and the Deposit Insurance Fund, rather than our shareholders.

The Company.Company. The Company is a bank holding company registered under the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956, as amended or ("the ActAct"), and is subject to regulation and supervision by the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve Board.System (the "Federal Reserve"). The Act and other federal laws subject bank holding companies to restrictions on the types of activities in which they may engage, and to a range of supervisory requirements and actions, including regulatory enforcement actions for violations of laws and regulations and unsafe and unsound banking practices. As a bank holding company, the Company is required to file with the Federal Reserve Board an annual report and such other additional information as the Federal Reserve Board may require pursuant to the Act. The Federal Reserve Board may also examine the Company and each of its subsidiaries. As a small bank holding company under the Federal Reserve Board'sReserve's Small Bank Holding Company Policy Statement, the Company is not subject to risk-based capital requirements adopted by the Federal Reserve, Board, which are substantially identical to those applicable to the Bank, and which are described below.

The Act requires approval of the Federal Reserve Board for, among other things, a bank holding company's direct or indirect acquisition of control of more than five percent (5%) of the voting shares, or substantially all the assets, of any bank or the merger or consolidation by a bank holding company with another bank holding company. The Act also generally permits the acquisition by a bank holding company of control, or substantially all of the assets of, any bank located in a state other
11

than the home state of the bank holding company, except where the bank has not been in existence for the minimum period of time required by state law; but if the bank is at least 5 years old, the Federal Reserve Board may approve the acquisition.

With certain limited exceptions, a bank holding company is prohibited from acquiring control of any voting shares of any company which is not a bank or bank holding company and from engaging


Table of Contents

directly or indirectly in any activity other than banking or managing or controlling banks or furnishing services to or performing service for its authorized subsidiaries. A bank holding company may, however, engage in, or acquire an interest in a company that engages in, activities which the Federal Reserve Board has determined by order or regulation to be so closely related to banking or managing or controlling banks as to be properly incident thereto. In making such a determination, the Federal Reserve Board is required to consider whether the performance of such activities can reasonably be expected to produce benefits to the public, such as convenience, increased competition or gains in efficiency, which outweigh possible adverse effects, such as undue concentration of resources, decreased or unfair competition, conflicts of interest or unsound banking practices. Some of the activities that the Federal Reserve Board has determined by regulation to be closely related to banking include making or servicing loans, performing certain data processing services, acting as a fiduciary or investment or financial advisor, and making investments in corporations or projects designed primarily to promote community welfare. The Federal Reserve may order a bank holding company or its subsidiaries to terminate any of these activities or to terminate its ownership or control of any subsidiary when it has reasonable cause to believe that the bank holding company's continued ownership, activity or control constitutes a serious risk to the financial safety, soundness, or stability of it or any of its bank subsidiaries.

The Gramm Leach-Bliley Act of 1999 or ("GLB Act,Act"), allows a bank holding company or other company to certify its status as a financial holding company, which would allow such company to engage in activities that are financial in nature, that are incidental to such activities, or are complementary to such activities. The GLB Act enumerates certain activities that are deemed financial in nature, such as underwriting insurance or acting as an insurance principal, agent or broker, underwriting, dealing in or making markets in securities, and engaging in merchant banking under certain restrictions. It also authorizes the Federal Reserve Board to determine by regulation what other activities are financial in nature, or incidental or complementary thereto. The Company has not elected financial holding company status.

The Act and the Federal Deposit Insurance Act or FDIA,("FDIA"), require a bank holding company to serve as a source of financial and managerial strength to its bank subsidiaries. As a result of a bank holding company's source of strength obligation, a bank holding company may be required to provide funds to a bank subsidiary in the form of subordinated capital or other instruments which qualify as capital under bank regulatory rules. Any loans from the holding company to such subsidiary banks likely would be unsecured and subordinated to such bank's depositors and perhaps to other creditors of the Bank. In addition, where a bank holding company has more than one FDIC-insured bank or thrift subsidiary, each of the bank holding company's subsidiary FDIC-insured depository institutions is responsible for losses to the FDIC as a result of an affiliated depository institution's failure.

A bank holding company is generally required to give the Federal Reserve prior written notice of any purchase or redemption of its own then outstanding equity securities. The Federal Reserve may disapprove such a purchase or redemption if it determines that the proposal would constitute an unsafe and unsound practice, or would violate any law, regulation, Federal Reserve order or directive, or any condition imposed by, or written agreement with, the Federal Reserve. The Federal Reserve has adopted an exception to this approval requirement for well-capitalized and well managed bank holding companies if the gross consideration for the purchase or redemption, when combined with the net consideration paid for all such purchases or redemptions during the preceding 12 months, is equal to 10% or more of the company's consolidated net worth.

As a Virginia corporation, the Company is subject to additional limitations and restrictions. For example, state law restrictions include limitations and restrictions relating to indemnification of directors, distributions to shareholders, transactions involving directors, officers or interested shareholders, maintenance of books, records, minutes, borrowing and the observance of corporate formalities.


Table of Contents

The Bank.Bank. The Bank is a Virginia chartered commercial bank and a member of the Federal Reserve System, or a state member bank, whose accounts are insured by the Deposit Insurance Fund of the FDIC up to the maximum legal limits of the FDIC. The Bank is subject to regulation, supervision and regular examination by the Virginia Bureau of Financial Institutions (the "VBFI") and the Federal Reserve Board.Reserve. The regulations of these various agencies govern most aspects of the Bank's business, including required reserves against deposits, loans, investments, mergers and acquisitions, borrowing, dividends and location and number of branch offices.

The laws and regulations governing the Bank generally have been promulgated to protect depositors and the Deposit Insurance Fund, and not for the purpose of protecting shareholders.

12

Commercial banks, savings and loan associations and credit unions are generally able to engage in interstate banking or acquisition activities. As a result, banks in the Washington, D.C. metropolitan area can, subject to limited restrictions, acquire or merge with a bank in another jurisdiction, and can branchde novo in any jurisdiction.

Banking is a business, which depends on interest rate differentials. In general, the difference between the interest paid by a bank on its deposits and its other borrowings and the interest received by a bank on loans extended to its customers and on securities held in its investment portfolio constitutes the major portion of the Bank's earnings. Thus, the earnings and growth of the Bank are subject to the influence of economic conditions generally, both domestic and foreign, and also to the monetary and fiscal policies of the United States and its agencies, particularly the Federal Reserve, Board, which regulates the supply of money through various means including open market dealings in United States government securities. The nature and timing of changes in such policies and their impact on the Bank cannot be predicted.

Subsidiary banks of a bank holding company are subject to certain restrictions imposed by the Federal Reserve Act on any extensions of credit to the bank holding company or any of its subsidiaries, or investments in the stock or other securities thereof, and on the taking of such stock or securities as collateral for loans to any borrower. Further, a bank holding company and any subsidiary bank are prohibited from engaging in certain tying arrangements in connection with the extension of credit. A subsidiary bank may not extend credit, lease or sell property, or furnish any services, or fix or vary the consideration for any of the foregoing on the condition that: (i) the customer obtain or provide some additional credit, property or services from or to such bank other than a loan, discount, deposit or trust service; (ii) the customer obtain or provide some additional credit, property or service from or to the Company or any other subsidiary of the Company; or (iii) the customer not obtain some other credit, property or service from competitors, except for reasonable requirements to assure the soundness of credit extended.

Branching and Interstate Banking.Banking. The federal banking agencies are authorized to approve interstate bank merger transactions without regard to whether such transaction is prohibited by the law of any state, unless the home state of one of the banks has opted out of the interstate bank merger provisions of the Riegle-Neal Interstate Banking and Branching Efficiency Act of 1994, or the Riegle-Neal Act, by adopting a law after the date of enactment of the Riegle-Neal Act and prior to June 1, 1997 which applies equally to all out-of-state banks and expressly prohibits merger transactions involving out-of-state banks. Interstate acquisitions of branches are permitted only if the law of the state in which the branch is located permits such acquisitions. Such interstate bank mergers and branch acquisitions are also subject to the nationwide and statewide insured deposit concentration limitations described in the Riegle-Neal Act. Washington, D.C., Maryland and Virginia have each enacted laws, whichthat permit interstate acquisitions of banks and bank branches. The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (the "Dodd-Frank Act") authorizes national and state banks to establishde novo branches in other states to the same extent as a bank chartered by that state would be permitted to branch.


Table of Contents

The GLB Act made substantial changes in the historic restrictions on non-bank activities of bank holding companies, and allows affiliations between types of companies that were previously prohibited. The GLB Act also allows banks to engage in a wider array of nonbanking activities through "financial subsidiaries."

Brokered Deposits. A "brokered deposit" is any deposit that is obtained from or through the mediation or assistance of a deposit broker. Deposit brokers may attract deposits from individuals and companies throughout the United States and internationally whose deposit decisions are based primarily on obtaining the highest interest rates. Certain reciprocal deposits of up to the lesser of $5 billion or 20% of an institution's deposits are excluded from the definition of brokered deposits, where the institution is "well-capitalized" and has a composite rating of 1 or 2. We have used brokered deposits in the past, and we intend to continue to use brokered deposits as one of our funding sources to support future growth. There are risks associated with using brokered deposits. In order to continue to maintain our level of brokered deposits, we may be forced to pay higher interest rates than those contemplated by our asset-liability pricing strategy. In addition, banks that become less than "well-capitalized" under applicable regulatory capital requirements may be restricted in their ability to accept or renew, or prohibited from accepting or renewing, brokered deposits. If this funding source becomes more difficult to access, we will have to seek alternative funding sources in order to continue to fund our growth. This may include increasing our reliance on FHLB borrowing,borrowings, attempting to attract additional non-brokered deposits, and selling loans.loans and securities. There can be no assurance that brokered deposits will be available, or if available, sufficient to support our continued growth. The unavailability of a sufficient volume of brokered deposits could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. The FDIC has proposed to adopt regulations that are intended to expand the ability of institutions to accept brokered deposits by, among other things, simplifying the process by which institutions and deposit brokers naymay obtain exemptions from the restriction or conditions on the acceptance of brokered deposits.

13

Anti-Money Laundering Laws and Regulations. The Company is subject to several federal laws that are designed to combat money laundering, terrorist financing, and transactions with persons, companies or foreign governments designated by U.S. authorities ("AML laws"). This category of laws includes the Bank Secrecy Act.    UnderAct of 1970, the UnitingMoney Laundering Control Act of 1986, the USA PATRIOT Act of 2001, and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Interceptthe Anti-Money Laundering Act of 2020.
The AML laws and Obstruct Terrorism Act, commonly referred to as the "USA Patriot Act,"their implementing regulations require insured depository institutions, broker-dealers, and certain other financial institutions are subject to prohibitions against specified financial transactionshave policies, procedures, and account relationships, as well as enhanced due diligence standards intendedcontrols to detect, prevent, and prevent, the use of the United States financial system forreport money laundering and terrorist financing activities.financing. The Bank Secrecy Act requiresAML laws and their regulations also provide for information sharing, subject to conditions, between federal law enforcement agencies and financial institutions, including banks,as well as among financial institutions, for counter-terrorism purposes. Federal banking regulators are required, when reviewing bank holding company acquisition and bank merger applications, to establishtake into account the effectiveness of the anti-money laundering programs, including employee training and independent audit requirements, meet minimum standards specified by the act, follow minimum standards for customer identification and maintenance of customer identification records, and regularly compare customer lists against lists of suspected terrorists, terrorist organizations and money launderers. The costs or other effectsactivities of the compliance burdens imposed byapplicants. To comply with these obligations, the Bank Secrecy Act or future anti-terrorist, homeland security or anti-money laundering legislation or regulation cannot be predicted with certainty.

Company has implemented appropriate internal practices, procedures, and controls.

Office of Foreign Assets Control. The United States has imposed economic sanctions that affect transactions with designated foreign countries, foreign nationals and others, which are administered by the U.S. Treasury Department's Office of Foreign Assets Control or OFAC.("OFAC"). The OFAC-administered sanctions targeting countries take many different forms. Generally, however, they contain one or more of the following elements: (i) restrictions on trade with or investment in a sanctioned country, including prohibitions against direct or indirect imports from and exports to a sanctioned country and prohibitions on a "U.S. person" engaging in financial transactions relating to making investments in, or providing investment-related advice or assistance to, a sanctioned country; and (ii) a blocking of assets in which the government or specially designated nationals of a sanctioned country have an interest by prohibiting transfers of property subject to U.S. jurisdiction (including property in the possession or control of U.S. persons). Blocked assets (e.g. property and bank deposits) cannot be paid out,


Table of Contents

withdrawn, set off or transferred in any manner without a license from OFAC. Failure to comply with these sanctions could have serious legal and reputational consequences.

Capital Adequacy.Adequacy. The Federal Reserve Board and the FDIC have adopted risk-based and leverage capital adequacy requirements, pursuant to which they assess the adequacy of capital in examining and supervising banks and bank holding companies and in analyzing bank regulatory applications. Risk-based capital requirements determine the adequacy of capital based on the risk inherent in various classes of assets and off-balance sheet items. The Dodd-Frank Act additionally requires capital requirements to be countercyclical so that the required amount of capital increases in times of economic expansion and decreases in times of economic contraction, consistent with safety and soundness.

The federal banking agencies have adopted rules referred to as the Basel III Rules, to implement the framework for strengthening international capital and liquidity regulation adopted by the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision or ("Basel III.III"). The Basel III framework, among other things, (i) introduced the concept of common equity tier one capital or CET1,("CET1"), (ii) required that most adjustments to regulatory capital measures be made to CET1 and not to the other components of capital, ()(iii) expanded the scope of the adjustments to capital that may be made as compared to existing regulations, and (iv) specified that Tier 1 capital consists of CET1 and "Additional Tier 1 capital" instruments meeting specified requirements.

The Basel III Rulesrules require institutions requires banks to maintain: (i) a minimum ratio of CET1 to risk-weighted assets of 4.5%, plus a "capital conservation buffer" of 2.5%, or 7.0%; (ii) a minimum ratio of Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets of 6.0%, plus the capital conservation buffer, or 8.5%; (iii) a minimum ratio of Total (Tier 1 plus Tier 2) capital to risk-weighted assets of 8.0%, plus the capital conservation buffer, or 10.5%; and (iv) a minimum leverage ratio of 4%, calculated as the ratio of Tier 1 capital to balance sheet exposures plus certain off-balance sheet exposures (computed as the average of the month-end ratios each month during a calendar quarter).

Basel III also provides for a "countercyclical capital buffer," generally to be imposed when federal banking agencies determine that excess aggregate credit growth becomes associated with a buildup of systemic risk. This buffer would be a CET1 add-on to the capital conservation buffer of 2.5%. The current policy of the Federal Reserve Board is to maintain the countercyclical capital buffer at 0% in a normal risk environment.

Banking institutions with a ratio of CET1 to risk-weighted assets above the minimum but below the minimum plus the capital conservation buffer (or below the combined capital conservation buffer and countercyclical capital buffer, when the latter is applied) may face constraints on their ability to pay dividends, effect equity repurchases, and pay discretionary bonuses to executive officers, which constraints vary based on the amount of the shortfall.

        Under the Basel III Rules, mortgage-servicing assets and deferred tax assets are subject to certain restrictions on their inclusion as capital. Certain deferred tax assets arising from temporary differences, mortgage-servicing assets, and significant investments in the capital of unconsolidated financial institutions in the form of common stock are each subject to an individual limit of 10% of CET1and an aggregate limit of 15% of CET1.

The amount of these items in excess of the 10% and 15% thresholds are deducted from CET1. Amounts of mortgage servicing assets, deferred tax assets and significant investments in unconsolidated financial institutions that are not deducted due to the aforementioned 10% and 15% thresholds are assigned a 250% risk weight. Finally, the Basel III Rules increase the risk weights for past-due loans, certain commercial real estate loans, and some equity exposures, and makes selected other changes in risk weights and credit conversion factors.

        The Basel III Rules also include, as part of the definition of CET1, a requirement that banking institutions include the amount of additional other comprehensive income, or AOCI, which primarily


Table of Contents

consists of unrealized gains and losses on available-for-sale securities, which are not required to be treated as other-than-temporary impairment, net of tax,) in calculating regulatory capital, unless the institution makes a one-time opt-out election from this provision in connection with the filing of its first regulatory reports after applicability of the Basel III Rules to that institution. The Bank opted out of this requirement and, as such, does not include AOCI in its regulatory capital calculation.

        The Basel III Rules provide for the manner of calculating risk-weighted assets, including the recognition of credit risk mitigation, such as the financial collateral and a range of eligible guarantors. They also include the risk weighting of equity exposures and past due loans; and higher (greater than 100%) risk weighting for certain commercial real estate exposures that have higher credit risk profiles, including higher loan-to-value, or LTV, and equity components. In particular, loans categorized as "high-volatility commercial real estate," or HVCRE, loans are required to be assigned a 150% risk weighting and require additional capital support. HVCRE loans are defined to include any credit facility that finances or has financed the acquisition, development or construction of real property, unless it finances: 1-4 family residential properties; certain community development investments; agricultural land used or usable for, and whose value is based on, agricultural use; or commercial real estate projects in which: (i) the LTV is less than the applicable maximum supervisory LTV ratio established by the bank regulatory agencies; (ii) the borrower has contributed cash or unencumbered readily marketable assets, or has paid development expenses out of pocket, equal to at least 15% of the appraised "as completed" value; (iii) the borrower contributes its 15% before the bank advances any funds; and (iv) the capital contributed by the borrower, and any funds internally generated by the project, is contractually required to remain in the project until the facility is converted to permanent financing, sold or paid in full. The "EconomicEconomic Growth, Regulatory Relief and Consumer Protection Act" or the 2018 Act, expanded the exclusion from HVCRE loans to include credit facilities financing the acquisition or refinance of, or improvements to, existing income producing property, secured by the property, if the cash flow being generated by the property is sufficient to support the debt service and expenses of the property in accordance with the institution's loan criteria for permanent financing. The 2018 Act also provides that the value of contributed property will be its appraised value, rather than its cost. The 2018 Act permits an institution to reclassify an HVCRE loan as a non-HVCRE loan upon substantial completion of the project, where the cash flow from the property is sufficient to support debt service and expenses, in accordance with the institution's underwriting criteria for permanent financing.

        The 2018 Act ("EGRRCPA") also directed the federal banking agencies to develop a "Community Bank Leverage Ratio,"Ratio" ("CBLR"), calculated by dividing tangible equity capital

14

Table of Contents
by average consolidated total assets. In October 2019, the federal banking agencies adopted a CBLR of 9%. If a "qualified community bank," generally a depository institution or depository institution holding company with consolidated assets of less than $10 billion, has a leverage ratio which exceeds the CBLR, then such institution is considered to have met all generally applicable leverage and risk based capital requirements;requirements, the capital ratio requirements for "well capitalized" status under Section 38 of the FDIA, and any other leverage or capital requirements to which it is subject. An institution or holding company may be excluded from qualifying community bank status based on its risk profile, including consideration of its off-balance sheet exposures; trading assets and liabilities; total notional derivatives exposures; and such other facts as the appropriate federal banking agencies determine to be appropriate. The Company and Bank qualify forWe adopted this simplified capital regime but can be no assurance that satisfactionon January 1, 2020. Effective September 30, 2022, we opted out of the CBLR will provide adequateframework. A banking organization that opts out of the CBLR framework can subsequently opt back into the CBLR framework if it meets the criteria listed above. We believe that the Bank met all capital for their operationsadequacy requirements to which it was subject as of December 31, 2021 and growth, or an adequate cushion against increased levels of nonperforming assets or weakened economic conditions.

December 31, 2022.

As discussed below, the Basel III Rulesrules also integrate the new capital requirements into the prompt corrective action provisions under Section 38 of the FDIA.

The capital ratios described above are the minimum levels that the federal banking agencies expect. Our state and federal regulators have the discretion to require us to maintain higher capital


Table of Contents

levels based upon our concentrations of loans, the risk of our lending or other activities, the performance of our loan and investment portfolios and other factors. Failure to maintain such higher capital expectations could result in a lower composite regulatory rating, which would impact our deposit insurance premiums and could affect our ability to borrow and costs of borrowing, and could result in additional or more severe enforcement actions. In respect of institutions with high concentrations of loans in areas deemed to be higher risk, or during periods of significant economic stress, regulators may require an institution to maintain a higher level of capital, and/or to maintain more stringent risk management measures, than those required by these regulations.

In December 2017, the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision published the last version of the Basel III accord, generally referred to as "Basel IV." The Basel Committee stated that a key objective of the revisions incorporated into the framework is to reduce excessive variability of risk-weighted assets, or RWA, which will be accomplished by enhancing the robustness and risk sensitivity of the standardized approaches for credit risk and operational risk, which will facilitate the comparability of banks' capital ratios; constraining the use of internally modeled approaches; and complementing the risk-weighted capital ratio with a finalized leverage ratio and a revised and robust capital floor. Leadership of the federal banking agencies who are tasked with implementing Basel IV supported the revisions. Although it is uncertain at this time, it is anticipated that some, if not all, of the Basel IV accord may be incorporated into the capital requirements framework applicable to the Bank.

In 2016, FASB issued the CECLcurrent expected credit losses ("CECL") model, which will becomebecame applicable to us on January 1, 2023. CECL requires financial institutions to estimate and establish a provision for credit losses over the lifetime of the asset, at the origination or the date of acquisition of the asset, as opposed to reserving for incurred or probable losses through the balance sheet date. Upon implementation, an institution would recognize a one-time cumulative effect adjustment to the allowance for creditcredit losses. The Federal Reserve and FDIC have adopted a rule providing for an optional three-year phase-in period for the day-one adverse regulatory capital effects upon adopting the standard.

The adjustment recorded at adoption was not significant to the overall allowance for credit losses or shareholders' equity as compared to December 31, 2022 and consisted of adjustments to the allowance for credit losses on loans as well as an adjustment to the Company's reserve for unfunded commitments.

Prompt Corrective Action.Action. Under Section 38 of the FDIA, each federal banking agency is required to implement a system of prompt corrective action for institutions that it regulates. The federal banking agencies have promulgated substantially similar regulations for this purpose. The following capital requirements currently apply to the Bank for purposes of Section 38.

Capital CategoryTotal
Risk-Based

Risk‑Based
Capital Ratio
Tier 1
Risk-Based

Risk‑Based
Capital Ratio
Common

Equity Tier 1

Capital Ratio
Leverage

Ratio
Tangible

Equity to

Assets
Supplemental

Leverage

Ratio

Well Capitalized

10% or greater8% or greater6.5% or greater5% or greatern/an/a

Adequately Capitalized

8% or greater6% or greater4.5% or greater4% or greatern/a3% or greater

Undercapitalized

Less than 8%Less than 6%Less than 4.5%Less than 4%n/aLess than 3%

Significantly Undercapitalized

Less than 6%Less than 4%Less than3%Less than 3%n/an/a

Critically Undercapitalized

n/an/an/an/aLess than 2%n/a

15

An institution generally must file a written capital restoration plan which meets specified requirements with the appropriate federal banking agency within 45 days of the date the institution receives notice or is deemed to have notice that it is undercapitalized, significantly undercapitalized or critically undercapitalized. The appropriate federal banking agency must provide the institution with written notice of approval or disapproval within 60 days after receiving a capital restoration plan, subject to extensions by the applicable agency.

        An institution that is required to submit a capital restoration plan must concurrently submit a performance guaranty by each company that controls the institution. Such guaranty shall be limited to the lesser of (i) an amount equal to 5.0% of the institution's total assets at the time the institution was notified or deemed to have notice that it was undercapitalized or (ii) the amount necessary at such time to restore the relevant capital measures of the institution to the levels required for the institution to be classified as adequately capitalized. Such a guaranty shall expire after the appropriate federal


Table of Contents

banking agency notifies the institution that it has remained adequately capitalized for four consecutive calendar quarters. An institution that fails to submit a written capital restoration plan within the requisite period, including any required performance guaranty, or fails in any material respect to implement a capital restoration plan, shall be subject to the restrictions in Section 38 of the FDIA that are applicable to significantly undercapitalized institutions.

        A "critically undercapitalized institution" is required to be placed in conservatorship or receivership within 90 days, unless the FDIC formally determines that forbearance from such action would better protect the Deposit Insurance Fund. Unless the FDIC or other appropriate federal banking agency makes specific further findings and certifies that the institution is viable and is not expected to fail, an institution that remains critically undercapitalized during the fourth calendar quarter after the date it became critically undercapitalized must be placed in receivership. The general rule is that the FDIC will be appointed as receiver within 90 days after an institution becomes critically undercapitalized unless good cause is shown and an extension is agreed to by the federal regulators. In general, good cause requires that adequate capital has been raised and is imminently available for infusion into the institution, except for certain technical requirements, which may delay the infusion for a period of time beyond the 90 day time period.

Immediately upon becoming undercapitalized, an institution shall become subject to the provisions of Section 38 of the FDIA, which (i) restrict payment of capital distributions and management fees; (ii) require that the appropriate federal banking agency monitor the condition of the institution and its efforts to restore its capital; (iii) require submission of a capital restoration plan; (iv) restrict the growth of the institution's assets; and (v) require prior approval of certain expansion proposals. The appropriate federal banking agency for an undercapitalized institution also may take any number of discretionary supervisory actions if the agency determines that any of these actions is necessary to resolve the problems of the institution at the least possible long-term cost to the Deposit Insurance Fund, subject in certain cases to specified procedures. These discretionary supervisory actions include: requiring the institution to raise additional capital; restricting transactions with affiliates; requiring divestiture of the institution or the sale of the institution to a willing purchaser; and any other supervisory action that the agency deems appropriate. These and additional mandatory and permissive supervisory actions may be taken with respect to significantly undercapitalized and critically undercapitalized institutions.

        Additionally, under Section 11(c)(5) of the FDIA, a conservator or receiver may be appointed for an institution where: (i) an institution's obligations exceed its assets; (ii) there is substantial dissipation of the institution's assets or earnings as a result of any violation of law or any unsafe or unsound practice; (iii) the institution is in an unsafe or unsound condition; (iv) there is a willful violation of a cease-and-desist order; (v) the institution is unable to pay its obligations in the ordinary course of business; (vi) losses or threatened losses deplete all or substantially all of an institution's capital, and there is no reasonable prospect of becoming "adequately capitalized" without assistance; (vii) there is any violation of law or unsafe or unsound practice or condition that is likely to cause insolvency or substantial dissipation of assets or earnings, weaken the institution's condition, or otherwise seriously prejudice the interests of depositors or the insurance fund; (viii) an institution ceases to be insured; (ix) the institution is undercapitalized and has no reasonable prospect that it will become adequately capitalized, fails to become adequately capitalized when required to do so, or fails to submit or materially implement a capital restoration plan; or (x) the institution is critically undercapitalized or otherwise has substantially insufficient capital.

Regulatory Enforcement Authority.Authority. Federal banking law grants substantial enforcement powers to the federal banking agencies. This enforcement authority includes, among other things, the ability to assess civil money penalties, to issue cease-and-desist or removal orders and to initiate injunctive actions against banking organizations and institution-affiliated parties. In general, these enforcement actions may be initiated for violations of laws and regulations and unsafe or unsound practices. Other


Table of Contents

actions or inactions may provide the basis for enforcement action, including misleading or untimely reports filed with regulatory authorities.

The Dodd-Frank Act. The Dodd-Frank Act made significant changes to the U.S. bank regulatory structure, affecting the lending, deposit, investment, trading and operating activities of financial institutions and their holding companies.was signed into law on July 21, 2010. The Dodd-Frank Act required a number of federal agencies to adoptsignificantly restructured the financial regulatory regime in the United States and has had a broad range of rules and regulations. The following provisions are considered to be of greatest significance toimpact on the Company:

        The 2018 Act includes provisions revising Dodd-Frank Act provisions, including provisions that, among other things: (i) exempt banks with less than $10 billion in assets from the ability-to-repay requirements for certain qualified residential mortgage loans; (ii) exempt certain transactions valued at less than $400,000 in rural areas from appraisal requirements; (iii) exempt banks and credit unions that originate fewer than 500 open-end and 500 closed-end mortgages from the expanded data disclosurescompliance changes required under the Home Mortgage Disclosureact.


The EGRRCPA, which became effective May 24, 2018, amended the Dodd-Frank Act or HMDA; (iv) amendto provide regulatory relief for certain smaller and regional financial institutions, such as the SAFE Mortgage Licensing Act by providing registered mortgage loan originators in good standingCompany and the Bank. The EGRRCPA, among other things, provides financial institutions with 120 days of transitional authority to originate loans when moving from a federal depository institution to a non-depository institution or across state lines; (v) require the CFPB to clarify how TILA-RESPA Integrated Disclosure applies to mortgage assumption transactions and construction-to-permanent home loans as well as outline certain liabilities related to model disclosure use; (vi) revise treatment of HVCRE exposures; and (vii) create the simplified CBLR. The 2018 Act also exempts community banks from the Volcker Rule, if they have less than $10 billion in total consolidated assets. assets with relief from certain capital requirements and exempts banks with less than $250 billion in total consolidated assets from the enhanced prudential standards and the company-run and supervisory stress tests required under the Dodd-Frank Act.

The 2018Dodd-Frank Act also


Table of Contents

adds certain protections for consumers, including veteranshas had, and active duty military personnel, expands credit freezes and call for the creation of an identity theft protection database.

        In addition, other new proposals for legislation continue to be introducedmay in the Congress that could further substantially increase regulation of the bank and non-bank financial services industries and impose restrictionsfuture have, a material impact on the Company’s operations, particularly through increased compliance costs resulting from new and general ability of firms withinpossible future consumer and fair lending regulations. The future changes resulting from the industry to conduct business consistent with historical practices. Federal and state regulatory agencies also frequently adopt changes to their regulations or change the manner in which existing regulations are applied. Certain aspects of current or proposed regulatory or legislative changes to laws applicable to the financial industry, if enacted or adopted,Dodd-Frank Act may impactaffect the profitability of our business activities, require more oversight or changechanges to certain of our business practices, includingimpose more stringent regulatory requirements, or otherwise adversely affect the ability to offer new products, obtain financing, attract deposits, make loansbusiness and achieve satisfactory interest spreadsfinancial condition of the Company and could exposethe Bank. These changes may also require the Company to additional costs, including increased compliance costs. These changes also may requireinvest significant management attention and resources to evaluate and make any necessary changes to operations to comply with new statutory and could have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

regulatory requirements.

Consumer Financial Protection Bureau.Bureau ("CFPB"). The Dodd-Frank Act created the CFPB, a new, independent federal agency with broad rulemaking, supervisory and enforcement powers under various federal consumer financial protection laws, including the Equal Credit Opportunity Act, Truth in Lending Act, Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act, Fair Credit Reporting Act, Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, the consumer financial privacy provisions of the GLB Act and certain other statutes. The CFPB has examination and primary enforcement authority with respect to depository institutions with over $10 billion in assets. Smaller institutions, including the Bank, are subject to rules promulgated by the CFPB but continue to be examined and supervised by federal banking agencies for compliance with federal consumer protection laws and regulations. The CFPB also has authority to prevent unfair, deceptive or abusive practices in connection with the offering of consumer financial products. The Dodd-Frank Act permits states to adopt consumer protection laws and standards that are more stringent than those adopted at the federal level and, in certain circumstances, permits state attorneys general to enforce compliance with both the state and federal laws and regulations.

The changes resulting from the Dodd-Frank Act and CFPB rulemakings and enforcement policies may impact the profitability of our business activities, limit our ability to make, or the desirability of making, certain types of loans, including non-qualified mortgage loans, require us to change our business practices, impose upon us more stringent capital, liquidity and leverage ratio requirements or otherwise adversely affect our business or profitability. The changes may also
16

Table of Contents
require us to dedicate significant management attention and resources to evaluate and make necessary changes to comply with the new statutory and regulatory requirements.

Mortgage Banking Regulation. The CFPB has concentrated much of its rulemaking efforts on reformsBank is subject to rules and regulations related to residential mortgage transactions.loans that, among other things, establish standards for loan origination, prohibit discrimination, provide for inspections and appraisals of property, require credit reports on prospective borrowers, in some cases restrict certain loan features and fix maximum interest rates and fees, require the disclosure of certain basic information to mortgagors concerning credit and settlement costs, limit payment for settlement services to the reasonable value of the services rendered and require the maintenance and disclosure of information regarding the disposition of mortgage applications based on race, gender, geographical distribution and income level. The CFPBBank is also subject to rules and regulations that require the collection and reporting of significant amounts of information with respect to mortgage loans and borrowers. The Bank’s mortgage origination activities are subject to the Federal Reserve’s Regulation Z, which implements the Truth in Lending Act. Certain provisions of Regulation Z require creditors to make a reasonable and good faith determination based on verified and documented information that a consumer applying for a mortgage loan has issued rules related to a borrower'sreasonable ability to repay and qualified mortgage standards, mortgage servicing standards,the loan originator compensation standards, requirements for high-cost mortgages, appraisal and escrow standards and requirements for higher-priced mortgages. The CFPB has also issued rules establishing integrated disclosure requirements for lenders and settlement agents in connection with most closed end, real estate secured consumer loans and rules which, among other things, expand the scope of information lenders must report in connection with mortgage and other housing-related loan applications under HMDA. These rules include significant regulatory and compliance changes and are expectedaccording to have a broad impact on the financial services industry.

        The rule implementing the Dodd-Frank Act requirement that lenders determine whether a consumer has the ability to repay a mortgage loan, established certain minimum requirements for creditors when making ability to pay determinations, and established certain protections from liability for mortgages meeting the definition of "qualified mortgages." Generally, the rule applies to all


Table of Contents

consumer-purpose, closed-end loans secured by a dwelling including home-purchase loans, refinances and home equity loans—whether a first or subordinate lien. The rule does not cover, among other things, home equity lines of credit or other open-end credit; temporary or "bridge" loans with a term of 12 months or less, such as a loan to finance the initial construction of a dwelling; a construction phase of 12 months or less of a construction-to-permanent loan; and business-purpose loans, even if secured by a dwelling. The rule afforded greater legal protections for lenders making qualified mortgages that are not "higher priced." Qualified mortgages must generally satisfy detailed requirements related to product features, underwriting standards, and a points and fees requirement whereby the total points and fees on a mortgage loan cannot exceed specified amounts or percentages of the total loan amount. Mandatory features of a qualified mortgage include: (1) a loan term not exceeding 30 years; and (2) regular periodic payments that do not result in negative amortization, deferral of principal repayment, or a balloon payment. Further, the rule clarified that qualified mortgages do not include "no-doc" loans and loans with negative amortization, interest-only payments, or balloon payments. The rule created special categories of qualified mortgages originated by certain smaller creditors.its terms. To the extent that we seek to make qualified mortgages,mortgage loans, we are required to comply with these rules, subject to available exclusions. Our business strategy, product offerings, and profitability may change as the rule is interpreted by the regulators and courts.

exceptions.

Fair and Responsible Banking. Banks and other financial institutions are subject to numerous laws and regulations intended to promote fair and responsible banking and prohibit unlawful discrimination and unfair, deceptive or abusive practices in banking. These laws include, among others, the Dodd-Frank Act, Section 5 of the Federal Trade Commission Act, the Equal Credit Opportunity Act, and the Fair Housing Act. Many states and local jurisdictions have consumer protection laws analogous, and in addition, to those listed above. These federal, state and local laws regulate the manner in which financial institutions deal with customers taking deposits, making loans or conducting other types of transactions. Failure to comply with these laws and regulations could give rise to regulatory sanctions, and actions by the U.S. Department of Justice and state attorneys general.

Financial Privacy.Privacy. Under the Federal Right to Privacy Act of 1978, which imposes a duty to maintain confidentiality of consumer financial records and prescribes procedures for complying with administrative subpoenas of financial records, financial institutions are required to disclose their policies for collecting and protecting confidential information. Consumers generally may prevent financial institutions from sharing personal financial information with nonaffiliated third parties except for third parties that market the institutions' own products and services. Additionally, financial institutions generally may not disclose consumer account numbers to any nonaffiliated third party for use in telemarketing, direct mail marketing or other marketing through electronic mail to consumers.

Community Reinvestment Act.Act ("CRA"). The CRA requires that, in connection with examinations of insured depository institutions within their respective jurisdictions, the federal banking agencies evaluate the record of each financial institution in meeting the needs of its local community, including low- and moderate-income neighborhoods. The Bank's record of performance under the CRA is publicly available. A bank's CRA performance is also considered in evaluating applications seeking approval for mergers, acquisitions, and new offices or facilities. Failure to adequately meet these criteria could result in additional requirements and limitations being imposed on the Bank. Additionally, we must publicly disclose the terms of certain CRA-related agreements.


In May 2022, the federal bank regulatory agencies jointly issued a proposed rule intended to strengthen and modernize the CRA regulatory framework.If implemented, the rule would, among other things, (i) expand access to credit, investment and basic banking services in low- and moderate-income communities, (ii) adapt to changes in the banking industry, including internet and mobile banking, (iii) provide greater clarity, consistency and transparency in the application of the regulations and (iv) tailor performance standards to account for differences in bank size, business model, and local conditions.
Concentration and Risk Guidance. The federal banking regulatory agencies promulgated joint interagency guidance regarding material direct and indirect asset and funding concentrations. The guidance defines a concentration as any of the following: (i) asset concentrations of 25% or more of Total Capital (loan related) or Tier 1 Capital (non-loan related) by individual borrower, small interrelated group of individuals, single repayment source or individual project; (ii) asset concentrations of 100% or more of Total Capital (loan related) or Tier 1 Capital (non-loan related) by industry,


Table of Contents

product line, type of collateral, or short-term obligations of one financial institution or affiliated group; (iii) funding concentrations from a single source representing 10% or more of Total Assets; or (iv) potentially volatile funding sources that when combined represent 25% or more of Total Assets (these sources may include brokered, large, high-rate, uninsured, internet-listing-service deposits, Federal funds purchased or other potentially volatile deposits or borrowings). If a concentration is present, management must employ heightened risk management practices including board and management oversight and strategic planning, development of underwriting standards, risk assessment and monitoring through market analysis and stress testing, third party review and increasing capital requirements.

        Additionally, the federal bank regulatory agencies have issued guidance governing financial institutions with concentrations in commercial real estate lending. The guidance provides that institutions that have (i) total reported loans for construction, land development, and other land which represent 100% or more of an institution's total risk-based capital; or (ii) total reported commercial real estate loans, excluding loans secured by owner-occupied commercial real estate, representing 300% or more of the institution's total risk-based capital and the institution's commercial real estate loan portfolio has increased 50% or more during the prior 36 months, are identified as having potential commercial real estate concentration risk. Institutions whichthat are deemed to have concentrations in commercial real estate lending are expected to employ heightened levels of risk management with respect to their commercial real estate portfolios, and may be required to hold higher levels of capital.

We have determined that we have a concentration in

17

commercial real estate lending, and while we believe we have implemented policies and procedures with respect to our commercial real estate lending consistent with the regulatory guidance, bank regulators could require us to implement additional policies and procedures consistent with their interpretation of the guidance that may result in additional costs to us.

FDIC Insurance Premiums.Premiums. The FDIC maintains a risk-based assessment system for determiningdeposits of the Bank are insured up to applicable limits by the FDIC’s Deposit Insurance Fund and are subject to deposit insurance premiums.assessments to maintain the Deposit Insurance Fund. The FDIC has established four risk categories, each subjectdeposit insurance assessment base is based on average total assets minus average tangible equity, pursuant to a different premium rate, ranging fromrule issued by the FDIC as required by the Dodd-Frank Act. Deposit insurance pricing is a low of 2.5 basis points up“financial ratios method” based on “CAMELS” composite ratings to 45 basis points, based upon an institution's status as well capitalized, adequately capitalized or undercapitalized, and the institution's supervisory rating. In general, an institution'sdetermine assessment base for calculating its deposit insurance premium is determined by subtracting its tangible equity and certain allowable deductions from its consolidated average assets. There are three adjustments that can be made to an institution's initial base assessment rate: (1) a potential decrease for long-term unsecured debt, including senior and subordinated debt and,rates for small established institutions a portion of Tier 1 capital; (2) a potential increase for secured liabilities above a threshold amount; and (3) for institutions other than those with the lowest risk rating, a potential increase for brokered deposits above a threshold amount. Institutions with less than $10 billion in assetsassets. The CAMELS rating system is a supervisory rating system designed to take into account and reflect all financial and operational risks that have been FDIC-insured for at least five years, instead of the four risk categories, a financial ratios method based on a statistical model estimating the bank's probability of failure over three years, utilizing seven financial ratios (leverage ratio; net income before taxes/total assets; nonperforming loans and leases/gross assets; other real estate owned/gross assets; brokered deposit ratio; one year asset growth; and loan mix index) and a weighted average of supervisory ratings components. The financial ratios method also provides that community banks with brokered deposits in excess of 10% of total consolidated assets (inclusive of reciprocal deposits if a bank is not well-capitalized or hasmay face, including capital adequacy, asset quality, management capability, earnings, liquidity, and sensitivity to market risk (“CAMELS”). CAMELS composite ratings set a composite supervisory rating other than amaximum assessment for CAMELS 1 or 2) may be subject to an increased assessment rate if it has experienced rapid growth; lowersand 2 rated banks, and set minimum assessments for lower rated institutions. In 2022 and 2021, the rangeCompany recorded expense of authorized assessment rates to 1.5 basis points $620 thousand and $770 thousand, respectively, for institutions posing the least risk, increases the range up to 40 basis points for institutions posing the most risk; and further lowers the range of assessment rates if the reserve ratio of the Deposit Insurance Fund increases to 2% or more. Institutions with over $10 billion in total consolidated assets are required to pay a surcharge of 4.5 basis points on their assessment base, subject to certain adjustments. The FDIC may also impose special assessments from time to time. Under the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (the "2017 Tax Act"), FDIC insured institutions with assets in excess of $10 billion are also subject to a phase out of the deductibility of deposit insurance premiums.

        The Dodd-Frank Act permanently increased the maximum deposit insurance amount for banks, savings institutions and credit unions to $250 thousand per depositor. The Dodd-Frank Act also broadened the base for calculating FDIC insurance assessments. Assessments are now based on a


Table of Contents

financial institution's average consolidated total assets less tangible equity capital. The Dodd-Frank Act requiredpremiums. In October 2022, the FDIC adopted a final rule to increase the reserve ratioassessment base rate schedules uniformly by two basis points beginning with the first quarterly assessment period of 2023. The assessment base rate may increase further as a result of the Deposit Insurance Fund to 1.35% of insured deposits and eliminatedrecent activity transpired in the requirement that the FDIC pay dividends to insured depository institutions when the reserve ratio exceeds certain thresholds.

banking industry.


Limitations on Incentive Compensation.    In April 2016, The federal bank regulatory agencies have issued comprehensive final guidance on incentive compensation policies intended to ensure that the Federal Reserve and other federal financial agencies re-proposed restrictions on incentive-basedincentive compensation pursuant to Section 956policies of the Dodd-Frank Act for financial institutions with $1 billiondo not undermine the safety and soundness of such institutions by encouraging excessive risk-taking. The Interagency Guidance on Sound Incentive Compensation Policies, which covers all employees that have the ability to materially affect the risk profile of financial institutions, either individually or more in total consolidated assets. For institutions with at least $1 billion but less than $50 billion in total consolidated assets,as part of a group, is based upon the proposal would impose principles-based restrictionskey principles that are broadly consistent with existing interagency guidance on incentive-based compensation. Such institutions would be prohibited from entering intoa financial institution’s incentive compensation arrangements should (i) provide incentives that do not encourage inappropriaterisk-taking beyond the institution’s ability to effectively identify and manage risks, (ii) be compatible with effective internal controls and risk management, and (iii) be supported by strong corporate governance, including active and effective oversight by the institution (i) by providing an executive officer, employee, director, principal shareholder or individuals who are "significant risk takers" with excessive compensation, fees, or benefits, or (ii) that could lead to material financial loss to the institution. The proposal would also impose certain governance and recordkeeping requirements on institutionsinstitution’s board of our size. directors.
The Federal Reserve would reserve the authority to impose more stringent requirements on institutions of our size. We are evaluating the expected impactwill review, as part of the proposalregular, risk-focused examination process, the incentive compensation arrangements of financial institutions, such as the Company and the Bank, that are not “large, complex banking organizations.” These reviews will be tailored to each financial institution based on the scope and complexity of the institution’s activities and the prevalence of incentive compensation arrangements. The findings of the supervisory initiatives will be included in reports of examination. Deficiencies will be incorporated into the institution’s supervisory ratings, which can affect the institution’s ability to make acquisitions and take other actions. Enforcement actions may be taken against a financial institution if its incentive compensation arrangements or related risk-management control or governance processes pose a risk to the institution’s safety and soundness, and the financial institution is not taking prompt and effective measures to correct the deficiencies. At December 31, 2022, the Company and the Bank have not been made aware of any instances of noncompliance with this guidance.

In October 2022, the SEC adopted a final rule directing national securities exchanges and associations, including The Nasdaq Stock Market, LLC, the exchange on which our business.

        Cybersecurity.common stock is listed, to implement listing standards that require listed companies to adopt policies mandating the recovery or “clawback” of excess incentive compensation earned by a current or former executive officer during the three fiscal years preceding the date the listed company is required to prepare an accounting restatement, including to correct an error that would result in a material misstatement if the error were corrected in the current period or left uncorrected in the current period. In February 2023, The Nasdaq Stock Market, LLC posted its initial rule filing with the SEC to implement this directive. The final rule will require us to adopt a clawback policy that is compliant with the new listing standard within 60 days after such standard becomes effective.

Cybersecurity. In March 2015, federal regulators issued two related statements regarding cybersecurity. One statement indicates that financial institutions should design multiple layers of security controls to establish lines of defense and to ensure that their risk management processes also address the risk posed by compromised customer credentials, including security measures to reliably authenticate customers accessing internet-based services of the financial institution. The other statement indicates that a financial institution's management is expected to maintain sufficient business continuity planning processes to ensure the rapid recovery, resumption and maintenance of the institution's operations after a cyber-attack involving destructive malware. A financial institution is also expected to develop appropriate processes to enable recovery of data and business operations and address rebuilding network capabilities and restoring data if the institution or its critical service providers fall victim to this type of cyber-attack. If we fail to observe the regulatory guidance, we could be subject to various regulatory sanctions, including financial penalties. On November 18, 2021, the federal bank regulatory agencies issued a final rule, effective April 1, 2022, imposing new notification requirements for cybersecurity incidents. The rule requires financial institutions to notify their primary federal regulator as soon as possible and no later than 36 hours after
18

the institution determines that a cybersecurity incident has occurred that has materially disrupted or degraded, or is reasonably likely to materially disrupt or degrade, the institution’s: (i) ability to carry out banking operations, activities, or processes, or deliver banking products and services to a material portion of its customer base, in the ordinary course of business, (ii) business line(s), including associated operations, services, functions, and support, that upon failure would result in a material loss of revenue, profit, or franchise value, or (iii) operations, including associated services, functions and support, as applicable, the failure or discontinuance of which would pose a threat to the financial stability of the United States.

On March 9, 2022, the SEC issued a proposed rule intended to enhance and standardize disclosures regarding cybersecurity risk management, strategy, governance, and cybersecurity incident reporting by public companies, such as the Company, that are subject to the reporting requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. The proposed rule would require current reporting about material cybersecurity incidents and periodic disclosures about policies and procedures to identify and manage cybersecurity risks, management’s role in implementing cybersecurity policies and procedures, and the board of directors’ cybersecurity expertise and its oversight of cybersecurity risk.
To date, we have not experienced a significant compromise, significant data loss or any material financial losses related to cybersecurity attacks, but our systems and those of our customers and third-party service providers are under constant threat and it is possible that we could experience a significant event in the future. Risks and exposures related to cybersecurity attacks are expected to remain high for the foreseeable future due to the rapidly evolving nature and sophistication of these threats, as well as due to the expanding use of Internet banking, mobile banking and other technology-based products and services by us and our customers.


Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act and Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2021. In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act ("CARES Act") was signed into law on March 27, 2020 and the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2021 ("Appropriations Act") was signed into law on December 27, 2020. Among other things, the CARES Act and Appropriations Act include the following provisions impacting financial institutions:

Table of Contents

Small Business Administration Paycheck Protection Program. The CARES Act created the SBA's PPP and it was extended by the Appropriations Act. Under the PPP, money was authorized for small business loans to pay payroll and group health costs, salaries and commissions, mortgage and rent payments, utilities, and interest on other debt. The loans were provided through participating financial institutions, such as the Bank, that processed loan applications and service the loans.

Item 1A. RISK FACTORS

The material risks and uncertainties that management believes affect us are described below. Any of these risks, if they are realized, could materially adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations, and consequently, the market value of our common stock. Additional risks and uncertainties not currently known to us or that we currently believe to be immaterial may also materially and adversely affect us. This Form 10-K also contains forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. If any of the matters included in the following information about risk factors were to occur, our business, financial condition, results of operations, cash flows or prospects could be materially and adversely affected.

Market Risks Related to Our Business

Our business and operations may be materially adversely affected by weak economic conditions.

Our business and operations, which primarily consist of banking activities, including lending money to customers and borrowing money from customers in the form of deposits, are sensitive to general business and economic conditions in the U.S. generally, and in the Washington, D.C. metropolitan area in particular. The economic conditions in our local markets may be different from the economic conditions in the U.S. as a whole. If economic conditions in the U.S. or any of our markets weaken, our growth and profitability from our operations could be constrained. In addition, foreign economic and political conditions could affect the stability of global financial markets, which could hinder economic growth. The current economic environment is characterized by rising interest rates gradually increasing from near historically low levels,as a result of contractionary monetary policy which could impact our ability to attract deposits and to generate attractive earnings through our loan and investment portfolios. All these factors can individually or in the aggregate be detrimental to our business, and the interplay between these factors can be complex and unpredictable. Unfavorable market conditions, including as a result of events such as the recent coronavirus outbreakCOVID-19 pandemic and related disruptions, can result in a deterioration in the credit quality of our borrowers and the demand for our
19

Table of Contents
products and services, an increase in the number of loan delinquencies, defaults and charge-offs, additional provisions for loan losses, a decline in the value of our collateral, and an overall material adverse effect on the quality of our loan portfolio.

Our business is also significantly affected by monetary and related policies of the U.S. federal government and its agencies. Uncertainty about the federal fiscal policymaking process, the medium and long-term fiscal outlook of the federal government, and future tax rates are concerns for businesses, consumers and investors in the U.S. Changes in any of these policies are influenced by macroeconomic conditions and other factors that are beyond our control. Adverse economic conditions and government policy responses to such conditions could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial conditions and results of operations.

We are subject to interest rate risk, which could adversely affect our profitability.

Our profitability, like that of most financial institutions, depends to a large extent on our net interest income, which is the difference between our interest income on interest-earning assets, such as loans and investment securities, and our interest expense on interest-bearing liabilities, such as deposits and borrowings.

Interest rates are highly sensitive to many factors that are beyond our control, including general economic conditions and policies of various governmental and regulatory agencies and, in particular, the Federal Reserve. Changes in monetary policy, including changes in interest rates, could influence not only the interest we receive on loans and securities and the interest we pay on deposits and borrowings, but such changes could affect our ability to originate loans and obtain deposits, the fair value of our financial assets and liabilities, and the average duration of our assets. If the interest rates paid on deposits and other borrowings increase at a faster rate than the interest rates received on loans and other investments, our net interest income, and therefore earnings, could be adversely affected.


Table of Contents

Earnings could also be adversely affected if the interest rates received on loans and other investments fall more quickly than the interest rates paid on deposits and other borrowings. Any substantial, unexpected or prolonged change in market interest rates could have a material adverse impact on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

        Our interest sensitivity profile was slightly asset sensitive as of December 31, 2019. As a result, we would expect small increases in net interest income if interest rates rise, and small declines in the event rates fall. However, such expectations are based on our assumptions as to deposit customer behavior in an increasing rate scenario.

When short-term interest rates rise, the rate of interest we pay on our interest-bearing liabilities may rise more quickly than the rate of interest that we receive on our interest-earning assets, which may cause our net interest income to decrease. Additionally, a shrinking yield premium between short-term and long-term market interest rates, a pattern usually indicative of investors' waning expectations of future growth and inflation, commonly referred to as a flattening of the yield curve, typically reduces our profit margin as we borrow at shorter terms than the terms at which we lend and invest.

In addition, an increase in interest rates could also have a negative impact on our results of operations by reducing the ability of borrowers to repay their current loan obligations. These circumstances could not only result in increased loan defaults, foreclosures and charge-offs, but also reduce collateral values and necessitate further increases to the allowance for loan losses, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Inflation can have an adverse impact on our business and on our customers.

In 2022, the United States experienced the highest rates of inflation since the 1980s. In an effort to reduce inflation, the Federal Reserve increased the federal funds target rate seven times in 2022 from 0 - 0.25% at the beginning of the year to 4.25 – 4.50% as of December 31, 2022. Market interest rates increased in response over the course of the year. Inflation generally increases the cost of products and services we use in our business operations, as well as labor costs. We may find that we need to give higher than normal raises to employees and start new employees at a higher wage. Furthermore, our clients are also affected by inflation and the rising costs of products and services used in their households and businesses, which could have a negative impact on their ability to repay their loans with us. As market interest rates rise, the value of our investment securities generally decreases, although this effect can be less pronounced for floating rate instruments. Higher interest rates reduce the demand for loans and increase the attractiveness of alternative investment and savings products, like U.S. Treasury securities and money market funds, which can make it difficult to attract and retain deposits.

Transition away from the London Interbank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”) to another benchmark rate could adversely affect our operations.

The administrator of LIBOR announced that the most commonly used U.S. dollar LIBOR settings would cease to be published or cease to be representative after June 30, 2023. Management cannot predict whether or when LIBOR will
20

actually cease to be available or what impact such a transition may have on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

The Adjustable Interest Rate (LIBOR) Act, enacted in March 2022, provides a statutory framework to replace LIBOR with a benchmark rate based on the Secured Overnight Funding Rate (“SOFR”) for contracts governed by U.S. law that have no or ineffective fallbacks. Although governmental authorities have endeavored to facilitate an orderly discontinuation of LIBOR, no assurance can be provided that this aim will be achieved or that the use, level, and volatility of LIBOR or other interest rates, or the value of LIBOR-based securities will not be adversely affected. There continues to be substantial uncertainty as to the ultimate effects of the LIBOR transition, including with respect to the acceptance and use of SOFR and other benchmark rates.

The transition from LIBOR could create considerable costs and additional risk. Since proposed alternative rates are calculated differently, payments under contracts referencing new rates will differ from those referencing LIBOR. The transition will change our market risk profiles, requiring changes to risk and pricing models, valuation tools, product design and hedging strategies. Furthermore, failure to adequately manage this transition process with our customers could adversely impact our reputation. To mitigate the risks associated with the expected discontinuation of LIBOR, we have ceased originating LIBOR-linked loans, implemented fallback language for LIBOR-linked commercial loans, adhered to the International Swaps and Derivatives Association 2020 Fallbacks Protocol for interest rate swap agreements, and have updated our systems to accommodate SOFR-linked loans. Although we are currently unable to assess what the ultimate impact of the transition from LIBOR will be, failure to adequately manage the transition could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
The ongoing COVID-19 pandemic and measures intended to prevent its spread could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
The COVID-19 pandemic has negatively impacted economic and commercial activity and financial markets, both globally and within the United States. Measures to contain the virus, such as stay-at-home orders, travel restrictions, closure of non-essential businesses, occupancy limitations and social distancing requirements, resulted in significant business and operational disruptions, including business closures, supply chain disruptions, and mass layoffs and furloughs. Though consumer and business spending and unemployment levels have improved significantly, the economic recovery has been uneven, with industries such as travel, entertainment, hospitality, and food service lagging. Supply chain disruptions precipitated by the abrupt economic slowdown have contributed to increased costs, lost revenue, and inflationary pressures for many segments of the economy. Further, a significant number of workers left their jobs during the COVID-19 pandemic, leading to wage inflation in many industries as businesses attempt to fill vacant positions.

The continuation of the COVID-19 pandemic, or the emergence of another health emergency, could (i) reduce the demand for loans and other financial services, (ii) result in increases in loan delinquencies, problem assets, and foreclosures, (iii) cause the value of collateral for loans, especially real estate, to decline in value, (iv) reduce the availability and productivity of our employees, (v) cause our vendors and counterparties to be unable to meet existing obligations to us, (vi) negatively impact the business and operations of third-party service providers that perform critical services for our business, (vii) cause the value of our investment securities portfolio to decline, (viii) and cause the net worth and liquidity of loan guarantors to decline, impairing their ability to honor commitments to us. Any one of the combination of events described above could have a material, adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations.
Credit Risks
We are subject to credit risk, which could adversely affect our profitability.

Our business depends on our ability to successfully measure and manage credit risk. As a lender, we are exposed to the risk that the principal of, or interest on, a loan will not be paid timely or at all or that the value of any collateral supporting a loan will be insufficient to cover our outstanding exposure. In addition, we are exposed to risks with respect to the period of time over which the loan may be repaid, risks relating to loan underwriting, risks resulting from changes in economic and industry conditions, and risks inherent in dealing with individual loans and borrowers. The creditworthiness of a borrower is affected by many factors including local market conditions and general economic conditions. If the overall economic climate in the U.S. generally, or in our market areas specifically, experiences material disruption, including as a result of events such as the recent coronavirus outbreakCOVID-19 pandemic and related disruptions, our borrowers may experience difficulties in repaying their loans, the collateral we hold may decrease in value or become illiquid, and our level of nonperforming loans, charge-offs and delinquencies could rise and require significant additional provisions for loan losses.

21

Table of Contents
Our risk management practices, such as monitoring the concentrations of our loans and our credit approval, review and administrative practices, may not adequately reduce credit risk, and our credit administration personnel, policies and procedures may not adequately adapt to changes in economic or any other conditions affecting related customers and the quality of the loan portfolio. Many of our loans are made to small businesses that are less able to withstand competitive, economic and financial pressures than larger borrowers. Consequently, we may have significant exposure if any of these borrowers becomes unable to pay their loan obligations as a result of economic or market conditions, or personal circumstances, such as divorce, unemployment or death. A failure to effectively measure and limit the credit risk associated with our loan portfolio may result in loan defaults, foreclosures and additional charge-offs, and may necessitate that we significantly increase our allowance for loan losses, each of which could adversely affect our net income. As a result, our inability to successfully manage credit risk could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.


Table of Contents

Losses related to any single loan could have a significant impact on our financial condition and results of operations.

        While our average funded loan size is relatively small compared to our legal lending limit, averaging $1.4 million for commercial real estate loans (including construction) and approximately $228 thousand for commercial and industrial loans, at December 31, 2019, our legal lending limit has increased, and we have originated larger loans in recent years. As a result of our commercial real estate lending, the loan portfolio contains approximately 12 loans which have balances in excess of 5% of our shareholder's equity, and our largest single exposure is $25.5 million, while our largest exposure to one borrower is $26.2 million. Additionally, commercial and industrial loans not primarily secured by real estate are typically made based on the ability of the borrower to make payment on the loan from the cash flow of the business, and are collateralized primarily by business assets such as equipment, inventory and accounts receivable. These assets are often subject to depreciation over time, may be more difficult than real estate collateral to evaluate, and may be more difficult to realize the value of upon foreclosure. As a result, the availability of funds for repayment of such loans is often contingent on the success of the business itself. Although we seek to structure and monitor our loans and the financial condition of our borrowers in an effort to avoid or minimize losses, unexpected reversals in the business of an individual borrower can occur, and the resulting decline in the quality of loans to such borrowers, and related provisions for credit losses, could have a material adverse effect on our earnings, financial condition and shareholder returns.

A substantial portion of our loans are and will continue to be real estate related loans in the Washington, D.C. metropolitan area. Adverse changes in the real estate market or economy in this area could lead to higher levels of problem loans and charge-offs, adversely affecting our earnings and financial condition.

We make loans primarily to borrowers in the Washington, D.C. and Baltimore metropolitan areas, focusing on the Virginia counties of Arlington, Fairfax, Loudoun and Prince William and the independent cities located within those counties, Washington D.C., and its Maryland suburbs, and have a substantial portion of our loans secured by real estate. These concentrations expose us to the risk that adverse developments in the real estate market, or in the general economic conditions in such areas, or the continuation of such adverse developments, could increase the levels of nonperforming loans and charge-offs, and reduce loan demand and deposit growth. In that event, we would likely experience lower earnings or losses. Additionally, if economic conditions in the area deteriorate, or there is significant volatility or weakness in the economy or any significant sector of the area's economy, our ability to develop our business relationships may be diminished, the quality and collectability of our loans may be adversely affected, our provision for loan losses may increase, the value of collateral may decline and loan demand may be reduced.

Increases to our nonperforming assets or other problem assets will have an adverse effect on our earnings.

As of December 31, 2019,2022, we had nonperforming loans and loans 90 days or more past due of $10.7$4.5 million, or 0.84%0.24% of total loans, $3.9 millionnet of other real estate owned, or OREO, and nonperforming assets of 0.95% of total assets.deferred fees. At that date, we had a $3.9 million loantwo loans considered a troubled debt restructuring, which is included in our nonperforming loan totals above. restructurings ("TDRs") totaling $830 thousand. If any of our loans which arebecome 90 or more days past due and still accruing becomeand move to nonaccrual loans, we will not record interest income on such loans, and may be required to reverse prior accruals, thereby adversely affecting our earnings. If the level of our nonperforming or other problem assets increases, we may be required to make additional provisions for loan losses, which will negatively impact our earnings. If we are required to foreclose on any collateral properties securing our loans, we will incur legal and other expenses in connection with the foreclosure and sale process and possible losses on the sale of OREOother real estate owned ("OREO") or other collateral. Additionally, the resolution of nonperforming assets, troubled debt restructurings


Table of Contents

TDRs and other problem assets requires the active involvement of management, which can distract management from its overall supervision of operations and other income producing activities.

Our concentrations of loans may create a greater risk of loan defaults and losses.

A substantial portion of our loans are secured byby various types of real estate in the Washington, D.C. metropolitan area and substantially all of our loans are to borrowers in that area. At December 31, 2019, 90.1%2022, 86.3% of our total loans were secured by real estate; commercial real estate loans, excluding construction and land development, comprised the largest portion of these loans at 64.6%59.8% of our portfolio. This concentrationconcentration exposes us to the risk that adverse developments in the real estate market, or the general economic conditions in our market, could increase our nonperforming loans and charge-offs, reduce the value of our collateral and adversely impact our results of operations and financial condition. Management believes that the commercial real estate concentration risk is mitigated by diversification among the types and characteristics of real estate collateral properties, sound underwriting practices, rigorous portfolio monitoring and ongoing market analysis. Construction and land development loans comprised 17.0%8.0% of total loans at December 31, 2019.2022. Commercial and industrial loans, excluding PPP, comprised 9.0%13.2%, of total loans at December 31, 2019.2022. These categories of loans have historically carried a higher risk of default than other types of loans, such as single family residential mortgage loans. The repayment of these loans often depends on the successful operation of a business or the sale or development of the underlying property, and, as a result, are more likely to be adversely affected by adverse conditions in the real estate market or the economy in general. While we believe that our loan portfolio is well diversified in terms of borrowers and industries, these concentrations expose us to the risk that adverse developments in the real estate market, or in the general economic conditions in the Washington, D.C. metropolitan area, could increase the levels of nonperforming
22

Table of Contents
loans and charge-offs, and reduce loan demand. In that event, we would likely experience lower earnings or losses. Additionally, if, for any reason, economic conditions in our market area deteriorate, or there is significant volatility or weakness in the economy or any significant sector of the area's economy, our ability to develop our business relationships may be diminished, the quality and collectability of our loans may be adversely affected, our provision for loan losses may increase, the value of collateral may decline and loan demand may be reduced.

Commercial real estate loans tend to have larger balances than single family mortgage loans and other consumer loans. Because the loan portfolio contains a significant number of commercial real estate loans with relatively large balances, the deterioration of one or a few of these loans may cause a significant increase in nonperforming assets. An increase in nonperforming loans could result in a loss of earnings from these loans, an increase in the provision for loan losses, or an increase in loan charge-offs, which could have an adverse impact on our results of operations and financial condition.

Our portfolio of loans to small and mid-sized community-based businesses may increase our credit risk.
Many of our commercial business and commercial real estate loans are made to small business or middle market customers. These businesses generally have fewer financial resources in terms of capital or borrowing capacity than larger entities and have a heightened vulnerability to economic conditions. If general economic conditions in the market area in which we operate negatively impact this important customer sector, our results of operations and financial condition may be adversely affected. Moreover, a portion of these loans have been made by us in recent years and the borrowers may not have experienced a complete business or economic cycle. The deterioration of our borrowers' businesses may hinder their ability to repay their loans with us, which could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.
Our government contractor customers, and businesses in the Washington, D.C. metropolitan area in general, may be adversely impacted by the federal government and a budget impasse.
At December 31, 2022, 13.2% of our total loans were outstanding to commercial and industrial customers. Of that, approximately 40.3% of outstanding commercial and industrial loans are to government contractors or their subcontractors specializing in the defense and homeland security and defense readiness sectors, and we have commitments of $305.1 million to such borrowers. We are actively seeking to expand our exposure to this business segment. While we believe that our loans to government contractor customers are unlikely to experience more than a delay in payment as a result of government shutdowns, the current emphasis on defense readiness presents an opportunity for many of our customers. In the event of a government shutdown, this could cause these customers to have their government contracts reduced or terminated for convenience, or have payments delayed, causing a loss of anticipated revenues or reduced cash flow, resulting in an increase in credit risk, and potentially defaults by such customers on their respective loans.
Our government contractor customers could also withdraw their deposit balances during a shutdown to fund current operations, resulting in additional liquidity risk. Additionally, temporary layoffs, salary reductions or furloughs of government employees or government contractors could have adverse impacts on other businesses in our market and the general economy of the Washington, D.C. metropolitan area, and may indirectly lead to a loss of revenues by our customers. As a result, a government shutdown could lead to an increase in the levels of past due loans, nonperforming loans, loan loss reserves and charge-offs, and a decline in liquidity.
We have extended off-balance sheet commitments to borrowers which expose us to credit and interest rate risk.
We enter into off-balance sheet arrangements in the normal course of business to meet the financing needs of our customers. These off-balance sheet arrangements include commitments to extend credit, standby letters of credit and guarantees which would impact our liquidity and capital resources to the extent customers accept or use these commitments. These instruments involve, to varying degrees, elements of credit and interest rate risk in excess of the amount recognized in the balance sheet. Our exposure to credit loss in the event of nonperformance by the other party to the financial instrument for commitments to extend credit and standby letters of credit and guarantees written is represented by the contractual or notional amount of those instruments. We use the same credit policies in making commitments and conditional obligations as we do for on-balance sheet instruments.
23

Our allowance for credit losses may be inadequate to absorb losses inherent in the loan portfolio, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Experience in the banking industry indicates that a portion of our loans will become delinquent, and that some may only be partially repaid or may never be repaid at all. We may experience losses for reasons beyond our control, such as the impact of general economic conditions on customers and their businesses. In determining the size of our allowance for credit losses, we rely on an analysis of our loan portfolio considering historical loss experience, volume and types of loans, trends in classification, volume and trends in delinquencies and nonaccruals, economic conditions and other pertinent information. Although we endeavor to maintain our allowance for credit losses at a level adequate to absorb any inherent losses in the loan portfolio, the determination of the appropriate level of the allowance for credit losses is inherently highly subjective and requires us to make significant estimates of and assumptions regarding current credit risk and future trends, and the accuracy of our judgments depends on the outcome of future events. Further, despite our underwriting criteria and historical experience, we may be particularly susceptible to losses due to: (i) the geographic concentration of our loans, (ii) the concentration of higher risk loans, such as commercial real estate, and commercial and industrial loans, and (iii) the relative lack of seasoning of certain of our loans.
Deterioration of economic conditions affecting borrowers, new information regarding existing loans, inaccurate management assumptions, identification of additional problem loans and other factors, both within and outside of our control, may result in our experiencing higher levels of nonperforming assets and charge-offs, and incurring credit losses in excess of our current allowance for credit losses, requiring us to make material additions to our allowance for credit losses, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Our federal and state banking regulators, as an integral part of their supervisory function, periodically review the allowance for credit losses. These regulatory agencies may require us to increase our provision for credit losses or to recognize further loan charge-offs based upon their judgments, which may be different from ours. If we need to make significant and unanticipated increases in the loss allowance in the future, or take additional charge-offs for which we have not established adequate reserves, our results of operations and financial condition could be materially adversely affected at that time.
Lack of seasoning of our loan portfolio could increase risk of credit defaults in the future.
As a result of our organic growth over the past several years, as of December 31, 2022, approximately $1.05 billion, or 56.9%, of the loans in our loan portfolio (excluding PPP loans) were first originated during the past three years. The average age by loan type for loans originated in the past three years is: commercial real estate loans—1.30 years; commercial and industrial loans—1.46 years; commercial construction loans—0.89 years; consumer residential loans—1.14 years; and consumer nonresidential loans—1.48 years. In general, loans do not begin to show signs of credit deterioration or default until they have been outstanding for some period of time, a process referred to as "seasoning." As a result, a portfolio of older loans will usually behave more predictably than a newer portfolio. Therefore, the recent and current level of delinquencies and defaults may not represent the level that may prevail as the portfolio becomes more seasoned and may not serve as a reliable basis for predicting the health and nature of our loan portfolio, including net charge offs and the ratio of nonperforming assets in the future. Our limited experience with these loans may not provide us with a significant history with which to judge future collectability or performance. However, we believe that our stringent credit underwriting process, our ongoing credit review processes, and our history of successful management of our loan portfolio, mitigate these risks. Nevertheless, if delinquencies and defaults increase, we may be required to increase our provision for loan losses, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Strategic Risks
We operate in a highly competitive market and face increasing competition from a variety of traditional and new financial services providers, which could adversely impact our profitability.

The banking business is highly competitive. We compete as a financial intermediary with other commercial banks, savings banks, credit unions, mortgage banking firms, consumer finance companies, securities brokerage firms, insurance companies, money market mutual funds and other financial institutions operating in the Washington, D.C. metropolitan area and elsewhere, as well as nontraditional competitors such as fintech companies and internet-based lenders, depositories and payment systems. Our profitability depends upon our continued ability to successfully compete with
24

Table of Contents
traditional and new financial services providers, some of which maintain a physical presence in our market areas and others of which maintain only a virtual presence.

Our primary market area is a highly competitive, highly branched, banking market. Competition in the market area for loans to small and middle-market businesses and professionals, our target market, is intense and pricing is important. Several of our competitors have substantially greater resources and


Table of Contents

lending limits than us, and offer certain services, such as extensive and established branch networks and trust services, that we do not currently provide or currently expect to provide in the near future. Moreover, larger institutions operating in the Washington, D.C. metropolitan area may have access to borrowed funds at lower cost than will be available to us. Additionally, deposit competition among institutions in the market area is strong. Increased competition could require us to increase the rates we pay on deposits or lower the rates that we offer on loans, which could reduce our profitability. Our failure to compete effectively in our market could restrain our growth or cause us to lose market share, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Our portfolio of loans to small and mid-sized community-based businesses may increase our credit risk.

        Many of our commercial business and commercial real estate loans are made to small business or middle market customers. These businesses generally have fewer financial resources in terms of capital or borrowing capacity than larger entities and have a heightened vulnerability to economic conditions. If general economic conditions in the market area in which we operate negatively impact this important customer sector, our results of operations and financial condition may be adversely affected. Moreover, a portion of these loans have been made by us in recent years and the borrowers may not have experienced a complete business or economic cycle. The deterioration of our borrowers' businesses may hinder their ability to repay their loans with us, which could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.

Our government contractor customers, and businesses in the Washington, D.C. metropolitan area in general, may be adversely impacted by the federal government and a budget impasse.

        At December 31, 2019, 9.0% of our total loans were outstanding to commercial and industrial customers. Of that, approximately 28.8% of outstanding commercial and industrial loans are to government contractors or their subcontractors specializing in the defense and homeland security and defense readiness sectors, and we have commitments of $131.6 million to such borrowers. We are actively seeking to expand our exposure to this business segment. While we believe that our loans to government contractor customers are unlikely to experience more than a delay in payment as a result of government shutdowns, the current emphasis on defense readiness presents an opportunity for many of our customers. In the event of a government shutdown, this could cause these customers to have their government contracts reduced or terminated for convenience, or have payments delayed, causing a loss of anticipated revenues or reduced cash flow, resulting in an increase in credit risk, and potentially defaults by such customers on their respective loans.

        Our government contractor customers could also withdraw their deposit balances during a shutdown to fund current operations, resulting in additional liquidity risk. Additionally, temporary layoffs, salary reductions or furloughs of government employees or government contractors could have adverse impacts on other businesses in our market and the general economy of the Washington, D.C. metropolitan area, and may indirectly lead to a loss of revenues by our customers. As a result, a government shutdown could lead to an increase in the levels of past due loans, nonperforming loans, loan loss reserves and charge-offs, and a decline in liquidity.

We may not be able to retain or grow our core deposit base, which could adversely impact our funding costs.

        Like many financial institutions, we rely on customer deposits as our primary source of funding for our lending activities, and we continue to seek customer deposits to maintain this funding base. Our future growth will largely depend on our ability to retain and grow our deposit base. As of December 31, 2019, we had $1.29 billion in deposits. Our deposits are subject to potentially dramatic fluctuations in availability or price due to certain factors outside of our control, such as increasing competitive pressures for deposits, changes in interest rates and returns on other investment classes,


Table of Contents

customer perceptions of our financial health and general reputation, adverse developments in general economic conditions of an individual's business, and a loss of confidence by customers in us or the banking sector generally, which could result in significant outflows of deposits within short periods of time or significant changes in pricing necessary to maintain current customer deposits or attract additional deposits. Any such loss of funds could result in lower loan originations, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Liquidity risk could impair our ability to fund operations and meet our obligations as they become due, and failure to maintain sufficient liquidity could materially adversely affect our growth, business, profitability and financial condition.

        Liquidity is essential to our business. Liquidity risk is the potential that we will be unable to meet our obligations as they become due because of an inability to liquidate assets or obtain adequate funding at a reasonable cost, in a timely manner and without adverse conditions or consequences. We require sufficient liquidity to fund asset growth, meet customer loan requests, customer deposit maturities and withdrawals, payments on our debt obligations as they come due and other cash commitments under both normal operating conditions and other unpredictable circumstances, including events causing industry or general financial market stress. Liquidity risk can increase due to a number of factors, including an over-reliance on a particular source of funding or market-wide phenomena such as market dislocation and major disasters. Factors that could detrimentally impact access to liquidity sources include, but are not limited to, a decrease in the level of our business activity as a result of a downturn in our market, adverse regulatory actions against us, or changes in the liquidity needs of our depositors. Market conditions or other events could also negatively affect the level or cost of funding, affecting our ongoing ability to accommodate liability maturities and deposit withdrawals, meet contractual obligations, and fund asset growth and new business transactions at a reasonable cost, in a timely manner, and without adverse consequences. Our inability to raise funds through deposits, borrowings, the sale of loans, and other sources could have a substantial negative effect on our business, and could result in the closure of the Bank. Our access to funding sources in amounts adequate to finance our activities or on acceptable terms could be impaired by factors that affect our organization specifically or the financial services industry or economy in general. Any substantial, unexpected, and/or prolonged change in the level or cost of liquidity could impair our ability to fund operations and meet our obligations as they become due and could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

        We rely on customer deposits, including brokered deposits, and to a lesser extent on advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank of Atlanta, or FHLB, to fund our operations. Although we have historically been able to replace maturing deposits and advances if desired, we may not be able to replace such funds in the future if our financial condition, the financial condition of the FHLB or market conditions were to change. FHLB borrowings and other current sources of liquidity may not be available or, if available, sufficient to provide adequate funding for operations.

Our reputation is critical to our business, and damage to it could have a material adverse effect on us.

        We believe that a key differentiating factor for our business is the strong reputation we have built in our market. Maintaining a positive reputation is critical to attracting and retaining customers and employees. Adverse perceptions of us could make it more difficult for us to execute on our strategy. Harm to our reputation can arise from many sources, including actual or perceived employee misconduct, errors or misconduct by our third party vendors or other counterparties, litigation or regulatory actions, our failure to meet our high customer service and quality standards, compliance failures and weakened financial condition. Negative publicity about us, whether or not accurate, may damage our reputation, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.


Table of Contents

Our allowance for loan losses may be inadequate to absorb losses inherent in the loan portfolio, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

        Experience in the banking industry indicates that a portion of our loans will become delinquent, and that some may only be partially repaid or may never be repaid at all. We may experience losses for reasons beyond our control, such as the impact of general economic conditions on customers and their businesses. In determining the size of our allowance for loan losses, we rely on an analysis of our loan portfolio considering historical loss experience, volume and types of loans, trends in classification, volume and trends in delinquencies and nonaccruals, economic conditions and other pertinent information. Although we endeavor to maintain our allowance for loan losses at a level adequate to absorb any inherent losses in the loan portfolio, the determination of the appropriate level of the allowance for loan losses is inherently highly subjective and requires us to make significant estimates of and assumptions regarding current credit risk and future trends, and the accuracy of our judgments depends on the outcome of future events. Further, despite our underwriting criteria and historical experience, we may be particularly susceptible to losses due to: (i) the geographic concentration of our loans, (ii) the concentration of higher risk loans, such as commercial real estate, and commercial and industrial loans, and (iii) the relative lack of seasoning of certain of our loans.

        Deterioration of economic conditions affecting borrowers, new information regarding existing loans, inaccurate management assumptions, identification of additional problem loans and other factors, both within and outside of our control, may result in our experiencing higher levels of nonperforming assets and charge-offs, and incurring loan losses in excess of our current allowance for loan losses, requiring us to make material additions to our allowance for loan losses, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

        Our federal and state banking regulators, as an integral part of their supervisory function, periodically review the allowance for loan losses. These regulatory agencies may require us to increase our provision for loan losses or to recognize further loan charge-offs based upon their judgments, which may be different from ours. If we need to make significant and unanticipated increases in the loss allowance in the future, or to take additional charge-offs for which we have not established adequate reserves, our results of operations and financial condition could be materially adversely affected at that time.

The success of our growth strategy depends, in part, on our ability to identify and retain individuals with experience and relationships in our market.

Our success depends, in large part, on our management team and key employees. The loss of any of our management team or our key employees could materially adversely affect our ability to execute our business strategy, and we may not be able to find adequate replacements on a timely basis, or at all. We cannot ensure that we will be able to retain the services of any members of our management team or other key employees. Failure to attract and retain a qualified management team and qualified key employees could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

In order to continue to grow successfully, we must also identify and retain experienced loan officers with local expertise and relationships. We expect that competition for experienced loan officers will continue to be intense and that there will be a limited number of qualified loan officers with knowledge of, and experience in, the community banking industry in our market area. Even if we identify individuals that we believe could assist us in building our franchise, we may be unable to recruit these individuals away from their current banks. In addition, the process of identifying and recruiting loan officers with the combination of skills and attributes required to carry out our strategy is often lengthy. Our inability to identify, recruit and retain talented personnel could limit our growth and could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations. The lack of acquisition


Table of Contents

opportunities in the future, or our inability to successfully bid for such opportunities as are available, could result in a slower pace of growth.

We may not be able to successfully manage continued growth.

As our capital base grows, so does our legal lending limit. We cannot be certain as to our ability to manage increased levels of assets and liabilities, or to successfully make and supervise higher balance loans. Further, we may not be able to maintain the relatively low number and level of nonperforming loans and charge-offs that we have experienced. We may be required to make additional investments in equipment, software, physical facilities and personnel to accumulate and manage higher asset levels and loan balances, which may adversely impact earnings, shareholder returns, and our efficiency ratio. Increases in operating expenses or nonperforming assets may have an adverse impact on the value of our common stock.

There can be no assurance that we will be able to continue to grow and to remain profitable in future periods, or, if profitable, that our overall earnings will remain consistent with our prior results of operations, or increase in the future. A downturn in economic conditions in our market, particularly in the real estate market, heightened competition from other financial services providers, an inability to retain or grow our core deposit base, regulatory and legislative considerations, a failure to maintain adequate internal controls and compliance processes, and failure to attract and retain high-performing talent, among other factors, could limit our ability to grow assets, or increase profitability, as rapidly as we have in the past. Sustainable growth requires that we manage our risks by following prudent loan underwriting standards, balancing loan and deposit growth without materially increasing interest rate risk or compressing our net interest margin, maintaining more than adequate capital at all times, hiring and retaining qualified employees and successfully implementing our strategic initiatives. Our failure to sustain our historical rate of growth or adequately manage the factors that have contributed to our growth could have a material adverse effect on our earnings and profitability and therefore on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

25

Regulatory requirements affecting our loans secured by commercial real estate could limit our ability to leverage our capital and adversely affect our growth and profitability.

The federal banking agencies have issued guidance governing financial institutions that have concentrations in commercial real estate lending. The guidance provides that institutions which have (i) total reported loans for construction, land development, and other land loans which represent 100% or more of an institution's total risk-based capital; or (ii) total reported commercial real estate loans, excluding loans secured by owner-occupied commercial real estate, representing 300% or more of the institution's total risk-based capital, where the institution's commercial real estate loan portfolio has increased 50% or more during the prior 36 months, are identified as having potential commercial real estate concentration risk. Institutions which are deemed to have concentrations in commercial real estate lending are expected to employ heightened levels of risk management with respect to their commercial real estate portfolios, and may be required to hold higher levels of capital. We have a concentration in commercial real estate loans, and we have experienced significant growth in our commercial real estate portfolio in recent years. As of December 31, 2019,2022, commercial real estate loans, as defined for regulatory purposes, represented 396.4%405% of our total risk-based capital. Of those loans, commercial construction, development and land loans represented 111.7%57% of our total risk based capital. Owner-occupied commercial real estate loans represented an additional 107.0%81% of our total risk based capital. Management has extensive experience in commercial real estate lending, and has implemented and continues to maintain heightened portfolio monitoring and reporting, and strong underwriting criteria with respect to its commercial real estate portfolio. Nevertheless, we could be required to maintain higher levels of capital as a result of our commercial real estate concentration,


Table of Contents

which could limit our growth, require us to obtain additional capital, and have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Lack of seasoning of our loan portfolio could increase risk of credit defaults in the future.

        As a result of our organic growth over the past several years, as of December 31, 2019, approximately $1.02 billion, or 79.9%, of the loans in our loan portfolio were first originated during the past three years. The average age by loan type for loans originated in the past three years is: commercial real estate loans—1.55 years; commercial and industrial loans—1.35 years; commercial construction loans—0.91 years; consumer residential loans—1.38 years; and consumer nonresidential loans—1.64 years. In general, loans do not begin to show signs of credit deterioration or default until they have been outstanding for some period of time, a process referred to as "seasoning." As a result, a portfolio of older loans will usually behave more predictably than a newer portfolio. Therefore, the recent and current level of delinquencies and defaults may not represent the level that may prevail as the portfolio becomes more seasoned and may not serve as a reliable basis for predicting the health and nature of our loan portfolio, including net charge-offs and the ratio of nonperforming assets in the future. Our limited experience with these loans may not provide us with a significant history with which to judge future collectability or performance. However, we believe that our stringent credit underwriting process, our ongoing credit review processes, and our history of successful management of our loan portfolio, mitigate these risks. Nevertheless, if delinquencies and defaults increase, we may be required to increase our provision for loan losses, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Limits on our ability to use brokered deposits as part of our funding strategy may adversely affect our ability to grow.

        A "brokered deposit" is any deposit that is obtained from, or through the mediation or assistance of, a deposit broker. These deposit brokers attract deposits from individuals and companies throughout the country and internationally whose deposit decisions are based almost exclusively on obtaining the highest interest rates. Recently enacted legislation excludes reciprocal deposits of up to the lesser of $5 billion or 20% of an institution's deposits from the definition of brokered deposits, where the institution is well capitalized and has a composite supervisory rating of 1 or 2. We have used brokered deposits in the past, and we intend to continue to use brokered deposits as one of our funding sources to support future growth. We have established a brokered deposit to total deposit tolerance ratio of 15%. As of December 31, 2019, brokered deposits, excluding reciprocal deposits, represented approximately 7.8% of our total deposits. Reciprocal deposits represented an additional 5.6% of total deposits at December 31, 2019. Currently, our brokered deposits have a comparable deposit cost to our core deposits. There are risks associated with using brokered deposits. In order to continue to maintain our level of brokered deposits, we may be forced to pay higher interest rates than those contemplated by our asset-liability pricing strategy which could have an adverse effect on our net interest margin. In addition, banks that become less than "well capitalized" under applicable regulatory capital requirements may be restricted in their ability to accept or renew, or prohibited from accepting or renewing, brokered deposits. If this funding source becomes more difficult to access, we will have to seek alternative funding sources in order to continue to fund our growth. This may include increasing our reliance on FHLB borrowings, attempting to attract additional non-brokered deposits, and selling loans. There can be no assurance that brokered deposits will be available, or if available, sufficient to support our continued growth. The unavailability of a sufficient volume of brokered deposits could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.


Table of Contents

We may face risks with respect to future expansion or acquisition activity.

We selectively seek to expand our banking operations through limitedde novo branching or opportunistic acquisition activities. We cannot be certain that any expansion activity, throughde novo branching, acquisition of branches of another financial institution or a whole institution, or the establishment or acquisition of nonbanking financial service companies, will prove profitable or will increase shareholder value. The success of any acquisition will depend, in part, on our ability to realize the estimated cost savings and revenue enhancements from combining our business and that of the target company. Our ability to realize increases in revenue will depend, in part, on our ability to retain customers and employees, and to capitalize on existing relationships for the provision of additional products and services. If our estimates turn out to be incorrect or we are not able to successfully combine companies, the anticipated cost savings and increased revenues may not be realized fully or at all, or may take longer to realize than expected. It is possible that the integration process could result in the loss of key employees, the disruption of each company's ongoing business, diversion of management attention, or inconsistencies in standards, controls, procedures and policies that adversely affect our ability to maintain relationships with clients and employees or to achieve the anticipated benefits of the merger. As with any combination of banking institutions, there also may be disruptions that cause us to lose customers or cause customers to withdraw their deposits. Customers may not readily accept changes to their banking arrangements that we make as part of or following an acquisition. Additionally, the value of an acquisition to us is dependent on our ability to successfully identify and estimate the magnitude of any asset quality issues of acquired companies.

We may not be successful in overcoming these risks or other problems encountered in connection with potential acquisitions or other expansion activity. Our inability to overcome these risks could have an adverse effect on our ability to implement our business strategy and enhance shareholder value, which, in turn, could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations.

Additionally, at December 31, 2019,2022, we had $7.1$7.2 million of goodwill related to our acquisition of Colombo. Goodwill and other intangible assets are tested for impairment on an annual basis or when facts and circumstances indicate that impairment may have occurred. Our financial condition and results of operationoperations may be adversely affected if that goodwillgoodwill is determined to be impaired, which would require us to take an impairment charge.

We have extended off-balance sheet commitments to borrowers which expose us to credit and interest rate risk.

        We enter into off-balance sheet arrangements in the normal course of business to meet the financing needs of our customers. These off-balance sheet arrangements include commitments to extend credit, standby letters of credit and guarantees which would impact our liquidity and capital resources to the extent customers accept or use these commitments. These instruments involve, to varying degrees, elements of credit and interest rate risk in excess of the amount recognized in the balance sheet. Our exposure to credit loss in the event of nonperformance by the other party to the financial instrument for commitments to extend credit and standby letters of credit and guarantees written is represented by the contractual or notional amount of those instruments. We use the same credit policies in making commitments and conditional obligations as we do for on-balance sheet instruments.

New lines of business, products, product enhancements or services may subject us to additional risk.

From time to time, we may implement new lines of business or offer new products and product enhancements as well as new services within our existing lines of business. There are substantial risks and uncertainties associated with these efforts. In developing, implementing or marketing new lines of business, products, product enhancements or services, we may invest significant time and resources. We


Table of Contents

may underestimate the appropriate level of resources or expertise necessary to make new lines of business or products successful or to realize their expected benefits. We may not achieve the

26

Table of Contents
milestones set in initial timetables for the development and introduction of new lines of business, products, product enhancements or services, and price and profitability targets may not prove feasible. External factors, such as compliance with regulations, competitive alternatives and shifting market preferences, may also impact the ultimate implementation of a new line of business or offerings of new products, product enhancements or services. Any new line of business, product, product enhancement or service could have a significant impact on the effectiveness of our system of internal controls. We may also decide to discontinue businesses or products, due to lack of customer acceptance or unprofitability.profitability. Failure to successfully manage these risks in the development and implementation of new lines of business or offerings of new products, product enhancements or services could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Liquidity Risks
We may not be able to retain or grow our core deposit base, which could adversely impact our funding costs.
Like many financial institutions we rely on customer deposits as our primary source of funding for our lending activities, and we continue to seek customer deposits to maintain this funding base. Our future growth will largely depend on the accuracyour ability to retain and completenessgrow our diverse deposit base. As of information providedDecember 31, 2022, we had $1.83 billion in deposits. Our deposits are subject to potentially dramatic fluctuations in availability or price due to certain factors outside of our control, such as increasing competitive pressures for deposits, changes in interest rates and returns on other investment classes, customer perceptions of our financial health and general reputation, adverse developments in general economic conditions of an individual's business, and a loss of confidence by customers in us or the banking sector generally, which could result in significant outflows of deposits within short periods of time or significant changes in pricing necessary to maintain current customer deposits or attract additional deposits. Any such loss of funds could result in lower loan originations, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and counterparties.

        In deciding whetherresults of operations.

Liquidity risk could impair our ability to extend creditfund operations and meet our obligations as they become due, and failure to maintain sufficient liquidity could materially adversely affect our growth, business, profitability and financial condition.
Liquidity is essential to our business. Liquidity risk is the potential that we will be unable to meet our obligations as they become due because of an inability to liquidate assets or enter intoobtain adequate funding at a reasonable cost, in a timely manner and without adverse conditions or consequences. We require sufficient liquidity to fund asset growth, meet customer loan requests, customer deposit maturities and withdrawals, payments on our debt obligations as they become due and other cash commitments under both normal operating conditions and other unpredictable circumstances, including events causing industry or general financial market stress. Liquidity risk can increase due to a number of factors, including an over-reliance on a particular source of funding or market-wide phenomena such as market dislocation and major disasters. Factors that could detrimentally impact access to liquidity sources include, but are not limited to, a decrease in the level of our business activity as a result of a slowdown in our market, adverse regulatory actions against us, or changes in the liquidity needs of our depositors. Market conditions or other events could also negatively affect the level or cost of funding, affecting our ongoing ability to accommodate liability maturities and deposit withdrawals, meet contractual obligations, and fund asset growth and new business transactions with customersat a reasonable cost, in a timely manner, and counterparties,without adverse consequences. Our inability to raise funds through deposits, borrowings, the sale of loans, other sources, and our ability to maintain sufficient deposits, could have a substantial negative effect on our business, and could result in the closure of the Bank. Our access to funding sources in amounts adequate to finance our activities or on acceptable terms could be impaired by factors that affect our organization specifically or the financial services industry or economy in general. Any substantial, unexpected, and/or prolonged change in the level or cost of liquidity could impair our ability to fund operations and meet our obligations as they become due and could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
We rely on customer deposits, including brokered deposits, and to a lesser extent on advances from the FHLB and federal funds purchased to fund our operations. Although we have historically been able to replace customer deposit withdrawals, maturing deposits, and advances if desired, we may rely on information furnished by or on behalf of customers and counterparties, including financial information. We may also rely on representations of customers and counterparties asnot be able to the accuracy and completeness of that information. In deciding whether to extend credit, we may rely upon customers' representations that their financial statements conform to generally accepted accounting principlesreplace such funds in the United States of America, or GAAP, and present fairly, in all material respects,future if our financial condition, the financial condition results of operations and cash flows of the customer. We alsoFHLB or market conditions were to change. FHLB borrowings and other current sources of liquidity may rely on customer representations and certifications,not be available or, audit or accountants' reports, with respectif available, sufficient to the business and financial conditionprovide adequate funding for operations.


27

Table of our customers. Our financial condition, results of operations, financial reporting and reputation could be negatively affected if we rely on materially misleading, false, inaccurate or fraudulent information.

Contents


Operational Risks
We depend on information technology and telecommunications systems of third parties, and any systems failures or interruptions could adversely affect our operations and financial condition.

Our business depends on the successful and uninterrupted functioning of our information technology and telecommunications systems. We outsource many of our major systems, such as data processing, deposit processing, loan origination, email and anti-money laundering monitoring systems. Of particular significance is our long-term contract for core data processing services with Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. The failure of these systems, or the termination of a third party software license or service agreement on which any of these systems is based, could interrupt our operations, and we could experience difficulty in implementing replacement solutions. In many cases, our operations rely heavily on secured processing, storage and transmission of information and the monitoring of a large number of transactions on a minute-by-minute basis, and even a short interruption in service could have significant consequences. Because our information technology and telecommunications systems interface with and depend on third party systems, we could experience service denials if demand for such services exceeds capacity or such third party systems fail or experience interruptions. If significant, sustained or repeated, a system failure or service denial could compromise our ability to operate effectively, damage our reputation, result in a loss of customer business and subject us to additional regulatory scrutiny and possible financial liability, any of which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. In addition, failure of third parties to comply with applicable laws and regulations, or fraud or misconduct on the part of employees of any of these third parties, could disrupt our operations or adversely affect our reputation.


Table of Contents

We are subject to cybersecurity risks and security breaches and may incur increasing costs in an effort to minimize those risks and to respond to cyber incidents, and we may experience harm to our reputation and liability exposure from security breaches.

Our business involves the storage and transmission of customers' proprietary information and security breaches could expose us to a risk of loss or misuse of this information, litigation and potential liability. While we have incurred no material cyber-attacks or security breaches to date, a number of other financial services and other companies have disclosed cyber-attacks and security breaches, some of which have involved intentional attacks. Attacks may be targeted at us, our customers or both. Although we devote significant resources to maintain, regularly update and backup our systems and processes that are designed to protect the security of our computer systems, software, networks and other technology assets and the confidentiality, integrity and availability of information belonging to us or our customers, our security measures may not be effective against all potential cyber-attacks or security breaches. Despite our efforts to ensure the integrity of our systems, it is possible that we may not be able to anticipate, or implement effective preventive measures against, all security breaches of these types, especially because the techniques used change frequently or are not recognized until launched, and because cyber-attacks can originate from a wide variety of sources, including persons who are involved with organized crime or associated with external service providers or who may be linked to terrorist organizations or hostile foreign governments. These risks may increase in the future as we continue to increase our internet-based product offerings and expand our internal usage of web-based products and applications. If an actual or perceived security breach occurs, customer perception of the effectiveness of our security measures could be harmed and could result in the loss of customers.

Failure to keep up with the rapid technological changes in the financial services industry could have a material adverse effect on our competitive position and profitability.
The financial services industry is undergoing rapid technological changes, with frequent introductions of new technology driven products and services. The effective use of technology increases efficiency and enables financial institutions to better serve customers and reduce costs. Our future success will depend, in part, upon our ability to address the needs of our customers by using technology to provide products and services that will satisfy customer demands for convenience, as well as to create additional efficiencies in our operations. Many of our competitors have substantially greater resources to invest in technological improvements than we have. We may not be able to implement new technology driven products and services effectively or be successful in marketing these products and services to our customers. Failure to successfully keep pace with technological change affecting the financial services industry could harm our ability to compete effectively and could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations. As these technologies are improved in the future, we may be required to make significant capital expenditures in order to
28

Table of Contents
remain competitive, which may increase our overall expenses and have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
A successful penetration or circumvention of the security of our systems, including those of third party providers or other financial institutions, or the failure to meet regulatory requirements for security of our systems, could cause serious negative consequences, including significant disruption of our operations, misappropriation of our confidential information or that of our customers, or damage to our computers or systems or those of our customers or counterparties, significant increases in compliance costs (such as repairing systems or adding new personnel or protection technologies), and could result in violations of applicable privacy and other laws, financial loss to us or to our customers, loss of confidence in our security measures, customer dissatisfaction, significant litigation and regulatory exposure, and harm to our reputation, all of which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Failure to keep up with the rapid technological changes in the financial services industry could have a material adverse effect on our competitive position and profitability.

        The financial services industry is undergoing rapid technological changes, with frequent introductions of new technology-driven products and services. The effective use of technology increases efficiency and enables financial institutions to better serve customers and reduce costs. Our future success will depend, in part, upon our ability to address the needs of our customers by using technology to provide products and services that will satisfy customer demands for convenience, as well as to create additional efficiencies in our operations. Many of our competitors have substantially greater resources to invest in technological improvements than we have. We may not be able to implement new technology-driven products and services effectively or be successful in marketing these products and services to our customers. Failure to successfully keep pace with technological change affecting the financial services industry could harm our ability to compete effectively and could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations. As these technologies are improved in the future, we may be required to make significant capital expenditures in order to remain competitive, which may increase our overall expenses and have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.


Table of Contents

Our risk management framework may not be effective in mitigating risks and/or losses to us.

Our risk management framework is comprised of various processes, systems and strategies, and is designed to manage the types of risk to which we are subject, including, among others, credit, market, liquidity, interest rate and compliance. Our framework also includes financial or other modeling methodologies that involve management assumptions and judgment. Our risk management framework may not be effective under all circumstances and may not adequately mitigate any risk or loss to us. If our risk management framework is not effective, we could suffer unexpected losses and our business, financial condition, results of operations or growth prospects could be materially and adversely affected. We may also be subject to potentially adverse regulatory consequences.

We may be adversely affected by the soundness of other financial institutions.

Our ability to engage in routine funding transactions could be adversely affected by the actions and commercial soundness of other financial institutions. Financial services companies are interrelated as a result of trading, clearing, counterparty and other relationships. As a result, defaults by, or even rumors or questions about, one or more financial services companies, or the financial services industry generally, could lead to market-wide liquidity problems and losses or defaults by us or other institutions. These losses could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

If we fail to design and maintain effective internal control over financial reporting, we may be unable to accurately report our financial results or prevent fraud, which could have a material adverse effect on us.

Our internal control over financial reporting is designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of the financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with GAAP.U.S. generally accepted accounting rinciples ("GAAP"). Effective internal control over financial reporting is necessary for us to provide reliable reports and prevent fraud.

We believe that a control system, no matter how well designed and managed, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control system are met. Because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within a company have been detected. We may not be able to identify all significant deficiencies and/or material weaknesses in our internal control system in the future, and our failure to maintain effective internal control over financial reporting in accordance with Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act and FDIC regulations could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

We are dependent on the use of data and modeling in both our management's decision-making generally and in meeting regulatory expectations in particular.

        The use of statistical and quantitative models and other quantitatively-based analyses is endemic to bank decision-making

Litigation and regulatory compliance processes,actions, including possible enforcement actions, could subject us to significant fines, penalties, judgments or other requirements resulting in increased expenses or restrictions on our business activities.
In the normal course of business, from time to time, we may be named as a defendant in various legal actions, arising in connection with our current and/or prior business activities. Legal actions could include claims for substantial compensatory or punitive damages or claims for indeterminate amounts of damages. Further, we may in the future be subject to consent orders or other formal or informal enforcement agreements with our regulators. We may also, from time to time, be the subject of subpoenas, requests for information, reviews, investigations and proceedings (both formal and informal) by governmental agencies regarding our current and/or prior business activities. Any such legal or regulatory actions may subject us to substantial compensatory or punitive damages, significant fines, penalties, obligations to change our business practices or other requirements resulting in increased expenses, diminished income and damage to our
29

Table of Contents
reputation. Our involvement in any such matters, whether tangential or otherwise, and even if the employment of such analyses is becoming increasingly widespreadmatters are ultimately determined in our operations. Liquidity stress testing, interest rate sensitivity analysis, allowance for loan loss measurement, portfolio stress testingfavor, could also cause significant harm to our reputation and divert management attention from the identificationoperation of possible violations of anti-money laundering regulations are examples of areasour business. Further, any settlement, consent order, other enforcement agreement or adverse judgment in which we are dependent on modelsconnection with any formal or informal proceeding or investigation by government agencies may result in litigation, investigations or proceedings as other litigants and the data that underlies them. We anticipate that model-derived insights will be used more widely in our decision-making in the future. While these quantitative techniques and approaches improve our decision-making, they also create the possibility that faulty data or flawed quantitative approaches could yield adverse outcomes or regulatory scrutiny. Secondarily, becausegovernment agencies begin independent reviews of the complexity inherent in these approaches, misunderstanding or misusesame activities. As a result, the outcome of their outputs could similarly result in suboptimal decision making, whichlegal and regulatory actions could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.


Increasing scrutiny and evolving expectations from customers, regulators, investors, and other stakeholders with respect to environmental, social and governance (“ESG”) practices may impose additional costs on us or expose us to new or additional risks.

Table


Companies are facing increasing scrutiny from customers, regulators, investors, and other stakeholders related to ESG practices and disclosure. Investor advocacy groups, investment funds and influential investors are also increasingly focused on these practices, especially as they relate to climate risk, hiring practices, the diversity of Contents

the work force, and racial and social justice issues. Increased ESG related compliance costs could result in increases to our overall operational costs. Failure to adapt to or comply with regulatory requirements or investor or stakeholder expectations and standards could negatively impact our reputation, ability to do business with certain partners, and our stock price. New government regulations could also result in new or more stringent forms of ESG oversight and expanding mandatory and voluntary reporting, diligence, and disclosure.

Risks Related to Our Securities
We may need to raise additional capital in the future, and we may not be able to do so.

Access to sufficient capital is critical in order to enable us to implement our business plan, support our business, expand our operations and meet applicable capital requirements. The inability to have sufficient capital, whether internally generated through earnings or raised in the capital markets, could adversely impact our ability to support and to grow our operations. If we grow our operations faster than we generate capital internally, we will need to access the capital markets. We may not be able to raise additional capital in the form of additional debt or equity on acceptable terms, or at all. Our ability to raise additional capital, if needed, will depend on, among other things, conditions in the capital markets at that time, our financial condition and our results of operations. Economic conditions and a loss of confidence in financial institutions may increase our cost of capital and limit access to some sources of capital. Further, if we need to raise capital in the future, we may have to do so when many other financial institutions are also seeking to raise capital and would then have to compete with those institutions for investors. An inability to raise additional capital on acceptable terms when needed could have a material adverse impact on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

We could be subject to environmental risks and associated costs on our foreclosed real estate assets.

        A substantial portion of our loan portfolio is secured by real property. During the ordinary course of business, we may foreclose on and take title to properties securing loans. There is a risk that hazardous or toxic substances could be found on these properties and that we could be liable for remediation costs, as well as personal injury and property damage. Environmental laws may require us to incur substantial expenses and may materially reduce the affected property's value or limit our ability to sell the affected property. The remediation costs and any other financial liabilities associated with an environmental hazard could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Litigation and regulatory actions, including possible enforcement actions, could subject us to significant fines, penalties, judgments or other requirements resulting in increased expenses or restrictions on our business activities.

        In the normal course of business, from time to time, we may be named as a defendant in various legal actions, arising in connection with our current and/or prior business activities. Legal actions could include claims for substantial compensatory or punitive damages or claims for indeterminate amounts of damages. Further, we may in the future be subject to consent orders or other formal or informal enforcement agreements with our regulators. We may also, from time to time, be the subject of subpoenas, requests for information, reviews, investigations and proceedings (both formal and informal) by governmental agencies regarding our current and/or prior business activities. Any such legal or regulatory actions may subject us to substantial compensatory or punitive damages, significant fines, penalties, obligations to change our business practices or other requirements resulting in increased expenses, diminished income and damage to our reputation. Our involvement in any such matters, whether tangential or otherwise, and even if the matters are ultimately determined in our favor, could also cause significant harm to our reputation and divert management attention from the operation of our business. Further, any settlement, consent order, other enforcement agreement or adverse judgment in connection with any formal or informal proceeding or investigation by government agencies may result in litigation, investigations or proceedings as other litigants and government agencies begin independent reviews of the same activities. As a result, the outcome of legal and regulatory actions could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.


Table of Contents

The appraisals and other valuation techniques we use in evaluating and monitoring loans secured by real property and other real estate owned may not accurately reflect the net value of the asset.

        In considering whether to make a loan secured by real property, we generally require an appraisal of the property. However, an appraisal is only an estimate of the value of the property at the time the appraisal is made, and, as real estate values may change significantly in value in relatively short periods of time (especially in periods of heightened economic uncertainty), this estimate may not accurately reflect the net value of the collateral after the loan is made. As a result, we may not be able to realize the full amount of any remaining indebtedness when we foreclose on and sell the relevant property. In addition, we rely on appraisals and other valuation techniques to establish the value of OREO, that we acquire through foreclosure proceedings and to determine loan impairments. If any of these valuations are inaccurate, our financial statements may not reflect the correct value of our OREO, if any, and our allowance for loan losses may not reflect accurate loan impairments. Inaccurate valuation of OREO or inaccurate provisioning for loan losses could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

We are subject to an extensive body of accounting rules and best practices. Periodic changes to such rules may change the treatment and recognition of critical financial line items and affect our profitability.

        The nature of our business makes us sensitive to the large body of accounting rules in the U.S. From time to time, the governing bodies that oversee changes to accounting rules and reporting requirements may release new guidance for the preparation of our financial statements. These changes can materially impact how we record and report our financial condition and results of operations. In some instances, we could be required to apply a new or revised standard retroactively, resulting in the restatement of prior period financial statements. Changes which have been approved for future implementation, or which are currently proposed or expected to be proposed or adopted include requirements that we: calculate the allowance for loan losses on the basis of the current expected credit losses over the lifetime of our loans, referred to as the CECL model, which is expected to be applicable to us beginning in 2023. These changes could adversely affect our capital, regulatory capital ratios, ability to make larger loans, earnings and performance metrics. Any such changes could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

        Under the CECL model, banks will be required to present certain financial assets carried at amortized cost, such as loans held for investment and held-to-maturity debt securities, at the net amount expected to be collected. The measurement of expected credit losses is to be based on information about past events, including historical experience, current conditions, and reasonable and supportable forecasts that affect the collectability of the reported amount. This measurement will take place at the time the financial asset is first added to the balance sheet and periodically thereafter. This differs significantly from the "incurred loss" model required under current GAAP, which delays recognition until it is probable a loss has been incurred. Accordingly, we expect that the adoption of the CECL model will materially affect how we determine our allowance for loan losses, and could require us to significantly increase our allowance. Moreover, the CECL model may create more volatility in the level of the allowance for loan losses. If we are required to materially increase the level of the allowance for loan losses for any reason, such increase could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations. We are evaluating the impact the CECL accounting model will have on our accounting, but expect to recognize a one-time cumulative-effect adjustment to the allowance for loan losses as of the beginning of the first reporting period in which the new standard is effective. We cannot yet determine the magnitude of any such one-time cumulative adjustment or of the overall impact of the new standard on our financial condition or results of operations.


Table of Contents

The fair value of our investment securities can fluctuate due to factors outside of our control.

        As of December 31, 2019, the fair value of our investment securities portfolio was approximately $141.6 million. Factors beyond our control can significantly influence the fair value of securities in our portfolio and can cause potential adverse changes to the fair value of these securities. These factors include, but are not limited to, rating agency actions in respect of the securities, defaults by the issuer or with respect to the underlying securities, and changes in market interest rates and instability in the capital markets. Any of these factors, among others, could cause other-than-temporary impairments, or OTTI, and realized and/or unrealized losses in future periods and declines in other comprehensive income, which could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition or results of operations. The process for determining whether impairment of a security is OTTI usually requires complex, subjective judgments about the future financial performance and liquidity of the issuer, any collateral underlying the security and our intent and ability to hold the security for a sufficient period of time to allow for any anticipated recovery in fair value, in order to assess the probability of receiving all contractual principal and interest payments on the security. Our failure to correctly and timely assess any impairments or losses with respect to our securities could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations.

We have no current plans to pay cash dividends.

Holders of our common stock are entitled to receive only such dividends as our board of directors may declare out of funds legally available for such payments. The Bank is our primary operating business and the source of substantially all of our earnings, and our ability to pay dividends will be subject to the earnings, capital levels, capital needs and limitations relating to the payment of dividends by the Bank to us. The amount of dividends that a bank may pay is limited by state and federal laws and regulations. While we have sufficient retained earnings and expect our future earnings to be sufficient to pay cash dividends, our board of directors currently intends to retain earnings for the purpose of financing growth. In addition, we are a bank holding company, and our ability to declare and pay dividends to our shareholders is dependent on federal regulatory considerations, including the guidelines of the Federal Reserve regarding capital adequacy and dividends. It is the policy of the Federal Reserve that bank holding companies should generally pay dividends on common stock only out of earnings, and only if prospective earnings retention is consistent with the organization's expected future needs, asset quality and financial condition.

Uncertainty relating

Risks Related to Our Industry

We operate in a highly regulated industry and the discontinuation, reformlaws and regulations that govern our operations, corporate governance, executive compensation and financial accounting or replacement of LIBORreporting, including changes in them or our failure to comply with them, may adversely affect our results of operations.

        In July 2017, the Financial Conduct Authority (the authority that regulates LIBOR) announced it intends to stop compelling banks to submit rates for the calculation of LIBOR after 2021. The Alternative Reference Rates Committee, or ARRC, has proposed that the Secured Overnight Financing Rate, or SOFR, as the rate that represents best practice as the alternative to USD-LIBOR for use in derivatives and other financial contracts that are currently indexed to USD-LIBOR. ARRC has proposed a paced market transition plan to SOFR from USD-LIBOR and organizations are currently working on industry wide and company specific transition plans as it relates to derivatives and cash markets exposed to USD-LIBOR. The Company has material contracts that are indexed to USD-LIBOR and is monitoring this activity and evaluating the related risks.

        The inability to obtain LIBOR rates, and the uncertainty as to the nature, comparability and utility of alternative reference rates which have been or may be established may adversely affect the value of LIBOR-based loans, investment securities and other financial instruments in our portfolio, and may impact the availability and cost of hedging instruments and borrowings. If LIBOR rates are no longer available, and the Bank is required to implement substitute indices for the calculation of interest rates under its loan agreements, it may incur additional expenses in effecting the transition, and may be



Table of Contents

subject to disputes or litigation with customers over the appropriateness or comparability to LIBOR of the substitute indices, which could have an adverse effect on its results of operations. At this time, it is not possible to predict the effect that these developments, any discontinuance, modification or other reforms to LIBOR or any other reference rate, the establishment of alternative reference rates, or the impact of any such events on contractual mechanisms may have on the markets, us or our fixed-to-floating rate debt securities. Uncertainty as to the nature of such potential discontinuance, modification, alternative reference rates or other reforms may negatively impact market liquidity, our access to funding required to operate our business and the trading market for our fixed-to-floating rate debt securities. Furthermore, the use of alternative reference rates or other reforms could cause the interest payable on our outstanding fixed-to-floating rate debt securities to be materially different, and potentially higher, than expected.

The effects of widespread public health emergencies may negatively affect our local economies or disrupt our operations, which would have an adverse effect on our business or results of operations.

        Widespread health emergencies, such as the recent coronavirus outbreak, can disrupt our operations through their impact on our employees, customers and their businesses, and the communities in which we operate. Disruptions to our customers could result in increased risk of delinquencies, defaults, foreclosures and losses on our loans, negatively impact regional economic conditions, result in a decline in local loan demand, loan originations and deposit availability and negatively impact the implementation of our growth strategy. Any one or more of these developments could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Risks Related to Our Industry

Our industry is highly regulated, and the regulatory framework, together with any future legislative or regulatory changes, may have a materially adverse effect on our operations.

        The banking industry is highly regulated and supervised under both federal and state laws and regulations that are intended primarily for the protection of depositors, customers, the public, the banking system as a whole or the FDIC Deposit Insurance Fund, not for the protection of our shareholders and creditors.

We are subject to extensive regulation and supervision bythat govern almost all aspects of our operations. These laws and regulations, among other matters, prescribe minimum capital requirements, impose limitations on our business
30

Table of Contents
activities, limit the Federal Reserve,dividends or distributions that we can pay, restrict the ability of institutions to guarantee our debt, and impose certain specific accounting requirements that may be more restrictive and may result in greater or earlier charges to earnings or reductions in our Bank is subject to regulation and supervision by the Federal Reserve and the VBFI.capital than GAAP. Compliance with these laws and regulations can be difficult and costly, and changes to laws and regulations canoften impose additional compliance costs.

We face increasing regulation and supervision of our industry. The Dodd-Frank Act which imposes significant regulatoryinstituted major changes to the banking and compliance changes on financial institutions is an example of this type of federal regulation. The laws and regulations applicable to us govern a variety of matters, including permissible types, amounts and terms of loans and investments we may make, the maximum interest rate that may be charged, the amount of reserves we must hold against deposits we take, the types of deposits we may accept and the rates we may pay on such deposits, maintenance of adequate capital and liquidity, changes in control of us and our Bank, transactions between us and our Bank, handling of nonpublic information, restrictions on dividends and establishment of new offices. We must obtain approval from our regulators before engaging in certain activities, and there is risk that such approvals may not be granted, either in a timely manner or at all. These requirements may constrain our operations, and the adoption of new laws andregulatory regimes. Other changes to or repeal of existing laws may have a further impact on our business, financial condition and results of operations. Also, the burden imposed by those federal and state regulations may place banks in general, including our Bank in particular, at a competitive disadvantage compared to their non-bank competitors. Our failure to comply with any applicable laws orstatutes, regulations, or regulatory policies, and interpretations of such laws and regulations, could result in sanctions by regulatory agencies, civil money penalties or damage to our reputation, all of which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.


Table of Contents

        Bank holding companies and financial institutions are extensively regulated and currently face an uncertain regulatory environment. Applicable laws, regulations, interpretations, enforcement policies and accounting principles have been subject to significantsupervisory guidance, including changes in recent years,interpretation or implementation of statutes, regulations, policies or supervisory guidance, could affect us in substantial and unpredictable ways. Such additional regulation and supervision has increased, and may be subject to significant future changes. Future changes may have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

        Federal and state regulatory agencies may adopt changes to their regulations or change the manner in which existing regulations are applied. We cannot predict the substance or effect of pending or future legislation or regulation or the application of laws and regulations to us. Compliance with current and potential regulation, as well as regulatory scrutiny, may significantly increase our costs, impede the efficiency of our internal business processes, require uscontinue to increase, our regulatory capital,costs and limit our ability to pursue business opportunitiesopportunities. Further, our failure to comply with these laws and regulations, even if the failure was inadvertent or reflects a difference in an efficient manner by requiringinterpretation, could subject us to expend significant time, effort and resources to ensure compliance and respond to any regulatory inquiries or investigations.

        In addition, regulators may elect to alter standards or the interpretation of the standards used to measure regulatory compliance or to determine the adequacy of liquidity, risk management or other operational practices for financial service companies in a manner that impacts our ability to implement our strategy and could affect us in substantial and unpredictable ways, and could have a material adverse effectrestrictions on our business financial conditionactivities, fines and other penalties, any of which could adversely affect our results of operations. Furthermore,operations, capital base and the regulatory agencies have extremely broad discretion in their interpretationprice of our securities. Further, any new laws, rules and regulations and their assessment of the quality of our loan portfolio, securities portfolio and other assets. If any regulatory agency's assessment of the quality of our assets, operations, lending practices, investment practices, capital structurecould make compliance more difficult or other aspects of our business differs from our assessment, we may be required to take additional chargesexpensive or undertake, or refrain from taking, actions that could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Federal and state regulators periodically examineotherwise adversely affect our business and may require us to remediate adverse examination findings or may take enforcement action against us.

        The Federal Reserve and the VBFI periodically examine our business, including our compliance with laws and regulations. If, as a result of an examination, the Federal Reserve or the VBFI were to determine that our financial condition, capital resources, asset quality, earnings prospects, management, liquidity or other aspects of any of our operations had become unsatisfactory, or that we were in violation of any law or regulation, they may take a number of different remedial actions as they deem appropriate. These actions include the power to require us to remediate any such adverse examination findings.

        In addition, these agencies have the power to take enforcement action against us to enjoin "unsafe or unsound" practices, to require affirmative action to correct any conditions resulting from any violation of law or regulation or unsafe or unsound practice, to issue an administrative order that can be judicially enforced, to direct an increase in our capital, to direct the sale of subsidiaries or other assets, to limit dividends and distributions, to restrict our growth, to assess civil money penalties against us or our officers or directors, to remove officers and directors and, if it is concluded that such conditions cannot be corrected or there is imminent risk of loss to depositors, to terminate our deposit insurance and place our Bank into receivership or conservatorship. Any regulatory enforcement action against us could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

condition.

We may be required to act as a source of financial and managerial strength for our Bank in times of stress.

Under federal law and long-standing Federal Reserve policy, we, as a bank holding company, are required to act as a source of financial and managerial strength to ourthe Bank and to commit resources


Table of Contents

to support the Bank if necessary. We may be required to commit additional resources to the Bank at times when we may not be in a financial position to provide such resources or when it may not be in our, or our shareholders' or creditors', best interests to do so. A requirement to provide such support is more likely during times of financial stress for us and the Bank, which may make any capital we are required to raise to provide such support more expensive than it might otherwise be. In addition, any capital loans we make to the Bank are subordinate in right of repayment to deposit liabilities of the Bank.

Regulatory initiatives regarding bank capital

We are subject to an extensive body of accounting rules and best practices. Periodic changes to such rules may change the treatment and recognition of critical financial line items and affect our profitability.

The nature of our business makes us sensitive to the large body of accounting rules in the U.S. From time to time, the governing bodies that oversee changes to accounting rules and reporting requirements may require heightened capital.

        Regulatory capital rules, which implementrelease new guidance for the Basel III regulatory capital reforms from the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision, include a common equity Tier 1 capital requirementpreparation of our financial statements. These changes can materially impact how we record and establish criteria that instruments must meet to be considered common equity Tier 1 capital, additional Tier 1 capital or Tier 2 capital. These enhancements were intended to both improve the qualityreport our financial condition and increase the quantityresults of capitaloperations. For example, we are required to be heldadopt the CECL model on January 1, 2023, which will require us to calculate the allowance for credit losses on the basis of the current expected credit losses over the lifetime of our loans. The Company adopted Accounting Standards Update ("ASU") 2016-13 as of January 1, 2023 in accordance with the required implementation date and recorded the impact of adoption to retained earnings, net of deferred income taxes, as required by banking organizations,the standard. The adjustment recorded at adoption was not significant to the overall allowance for credit losses or shareholders' equity as compared to December 31, 2022 and consisted of adjustments to better equip the U.S. banking systemallowance for credit losses on loans as well as an adjustment to deal with adverse economic conditions. The capital rules require banks to maintain a common equity Tier 1 capital ratio of 6.5% or greater, a Tier 1 capital ratio of 8% or greater, a total capital ratio of 10% or greater and a leverage ratio of 5% or greater tothe Company's reserve for unfunded commitments. In some instances, we could be deemed "well capitalized" for purposes of certain rules and prompt corrective action requirements. Bank holding companies and banks are also required to holdapply a capital conservation buffernew or revised standard retroactively, resulting in the restatement of common equity Tier 1prior period financial statements.These changes could adversely affect our capital, of 2.5% to avoid limitations on capital distributions and discretionary executive compensation payments.

        The Federal Reserve may also set higher capital requirements for holding companies whose circumstances warrant it. For example, holding companies experiencing significant internal growth or making acquisitions are expected to maintain strong capital positions substantially above the minimum supervisory levels, without significant reliance on intangible assets. Our regulatory capital ratios, currently are in excess of the levels established for "well capitalized" institutions. Future regulatory change could impose higher capital standards.

        The 2018 Act directed the federal banking agenciesability to develop a CBLR, calculated by dividing tangible equity capital by average consolidated total assets. In October 2019, the federal banking agencies adopted a CBLR of 9%. If a "qualified community bank," generally a depository institution or depository institution holding company with consolidated assets of less than $10 billion, has a leverage ratio which exceeds the CBLR of 9%, thenmake larger loans, earnings and performance metrics. Any such bank will be considered to have met all generally applicable leverage and risk based capital requirements; the capital ratio requirements for "well capitalized" status under Section 38 of the FDIA, and any other leverage or capital requirements to which it is subject. As of December 31, 2019, we qualified for this simplified capital regime, however, there can be no assurance that satisfaction of the CBLR will provide adequate capital for our operations and growth, or an adequate cushion against increase levels of nonperforming assets or weakened economic conditions.

        Any new or revised standards adopted in the future may require us to maintain materially more capital, with common equity as a more predominant component, or manage the configuration of our assets and liabilities to comply with formulaic liquidity requirements. We may not be able to raise additional capital at all, or on terms acceptable to us. Failure to maintain capital to meet current or future regulatory requirementschanges could have a significant material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

We face a risk of noncompliance and enforcement action with the Bank Secrecy Act and other anti-money laundering statutes and regulations.

        The Bank Secrecy Act of 1970, the USA Patriot Act and other laws and regulations

Regulatory initiatives regarding bank capital requirements may require financial institutions, among other duties, to institute and maintain an effective anti-money laundering

heightened capital.

Table of Contents

program and to file reports such as suspicious activity reports and currency transaction reports. We are required to comply with these and other anti-money laundering requirements. Our federal and state banking regulators, the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network, or FinCEN, and other government agencies are authorized to impose significant civil money penalties for violations of anti-money laundering requirements. We are also subject to increased scrutiny of compliance with the regulations issued and enforced by the OFAC. If our program is deemed deficient, we could be subject to liability, including fines, civil money penalties and other regulatory actions, which may include restrictions on our business operations and our ability to pay dividends, restrictions on mergers and acquisitions activity, restrictions on expansion, and restrictions on entering new business lines. Failure to maintain and implement adequate programs to combat money laundering and terrorist financing could also have significant reputational consequences for us. Any of these circumstances could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations.

We are subject to numerous "faircapital adequacy guidelines and responsible banking" laws designedother regulatory requirements specifying minimum amounts and types of capital that we must maintain. From time to protect consumers,time, regulators implement changes to these regulatory capital adequacy guidelines. If we fail to meet these minimum capital guidelines and/or other regulatory requirements, our financial condition would be materially and failureadversely affected. The Basel III rules require bank holding companies and their subsidiaries to maintain significantly more capital as a result of higher required capital levels and more demanding regulatory capital risk weightings and calculations. The Bank must also comply with these lawsthe capital requirements set forth in the “prompt corrective action” regulations pursuant to Section 38 of the FDIA. Satisfying capital requirements may require us to limit our banking operations, retain net income or reduce dividends to improve regulatory capital levels, which could lead to a wide variety of sanctions.

        The Community Reinvestment Act, the Equal Credit Opportunity Act, the Fair Housing Act and other fair lending laws and regulations, including state laws and regulations, prohibit discriminatory lending practices by financial institutions. The Federal Trade Commission Act and the Dodd-Frank Act prohibit unfair, deceptive, or abusive acts or practices by financial institutions. The U.S. Department of Justice, or DOJ, federal banking agencies, and other federal and state agencies are responsible for enforcing these fair and responsible banking laws and regulations. A challenge to an institution's compliance with fair and responsible banking laws and regulations could result in a wide variety of sanctions, including damages and civil money penalties, injunctive relief, restrictions on mergers and acquisitions activity, restrictions on expansion and restrictions on entering new business lines. Private parties may also have the ability to challenge an institution's performance under fair lending laws in private class action litigation. Such actions could have a material adverse effect onnegatively affect our reputation, business, financial condition and results of operations.

We are subject to laws regarding the privacy, information security and protection of personal information and any violation of these laws or another incident involving personal, confidential or proprietary information of individuals could damage our reputation and otherwise adversely affect our business.

        Our business requires the collection and retention of large volumes of customer data, including personally identifiable information, or PII, in various information systems that we maintain and in those maintained by third party service providers. We also maintain important internal company data such as PII about our employees and information relating to our operations. We are subject to complex and evolving laws and regulations governing the privacy and protection of PII of individuals (including customers, employees and other third parties). For example, our business is subject to the GLB Act, which, among other things: (i) imposes certain limitations on our ability to share nonpublic PII about our customers with nonaffiliated third parties; (ii) requires that we provide certain disclosures to customers about our information collection, sharing and security practices and afford customers the right to "opt out" of any information sharing by us with nonaffiliated third parties (with certain exceptions); and (iii) requires that we develop, implement and maintain a written comprehensive information security program containing appropriate safeguards based on our size and complexity, the nature and scope of our activities, and the sensitivity of customer information we process, as well as plans for responding to data security breaches. Various federal and state banking regulators and states have also enacted data breach notification requirements with varying levels of individual, consumer, regulatory or law enforcement notification in the event of a security breach. Ensuring that our collection, use, transfer and storage of PII complies with all applicable laws and regulations can increase our costs. Furthermore, we may not be able to ensure that customers and other third parties have appropriate controls in place to protect the confidentiality of the information that they exchange


Table of Contents

with us, particularly where such information is transmitted by electronic means. If personal, confidential or proprietary information of customers or others were to be mishandled or misused (in situations where, for example, such information was erroneously provided to parties who are not permitted to have the information, or where such information was intercepted or otherwise compromised by third parties), we could be exposed to litigation or regulatory sanctions under privacy and data protection laws and regulations. Concerns regarding the effectiveness of our measures to safeguard PII, or even the perception that such measures are inadequate, could cause us to lose customers or potential customers and thereby reduce our revenues. Accordingly, any failure, or perceived failure, to comply with applicable privacy or data protection laws and regulations may subject us to inquiries, examinations and investigations that could result in requirements to modify or cease certain operations or practices or in significant liabilities, fines or penalties, and could damage our reputation and otherwise adversely affect our operations, financial condition and results of operations.

Our use of third party vendors and our other ongoing third party business relationships are subject to increasing regulatory requirements and attention.

We regularly use third party vendors in our business and we rely on some of these vendors for critical functions including, but not limited to, our core processing function. Third party relationships are subject to increasingly demanding
31

Table of Contents
regulatory requirements and attention by bank regulators. We expect our regulators to hold us responsible for deficiencies in our oversight or control of our third party vendor relationships and in the performance of the parties with which we have these relationships. As a result, if our regulators conclude that we have not exercised adequate oversight and control over our third party vendors or that such vendors have not performed adequately, we could be subject to administrative penalties or fines as well as requirements for consumer remediation, any of which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Rulemaking changes implemented by

General Risks

Severe weather, natural disasters, geopolitical conditions, acts of war or terrorism, public health issues, and other external events could significantly impact our business.

Severe weather, natural disasters, geopolitical conditions, acts of war or terrorism, public health issues, and other adverse external events could have a significant impact on our ability to conduct business. In addition, such events could affect the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau willstability of our deposit base, impair the ability of borrowers to repay outstanding loans, impair the value of collateral securing loans, cause significant property damage, result in higher regulatory and compliance costs that may adversely affect our business.

loss of revenue, and/or cause us to incur additional expenses. The Dodd-Frank Act created a new, independent federal agency,occurrence of any such event in the CFPB, which was granted broad rulemaking, supervisory and enforcement powers under various federal consumer financial protection laws. The consumer protection provisions of the Dodd-Frank Act and the examination, supervision and enforcement of those laws and implementing regulations issued by the CFPB have created a more intense and complex environment for consumer finance regulation. The ultimate impact of this heightened scrutiny is uncertain but could result in changes to pricing, practices, products and procedures. It could also result in increased costs related to regulatory oversight, supervision and examination. These changesfuture could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Potential limitations on incentive compensation containedwhich, in proposed federal agency rulemaking may adversely affect our ability to attract and retain our highest performing employees.

        The Federal Reserve, other federal banking agencies and the Securities and Exchange Commission, or SEC, have jointly published proposed rules designed to implement provisions of the Dodd-Frank Act prohibiting incentive compensation arrangements that would encourage inappropriate risk taking at covered financial institutions, which includes a bank or bank holding company with $1 billion or more in consolidated assets. It cannot be determined at this time whether or when a final rule will be adopted and whether compliance with such a final rule will substantially affect the manner in which we structure compensation for our executives and other employees. Depending on the nature and application of the final rules, we may not be able to successfully compete with financial institutions and


Table of Contents

other companies that are not subject to some or all of the rules to retain and attract executives and other high performing employees.

The Bank's FDIC deposit insurance premiums and assessments may increase.

        The Bank's deposits are insured by the FDIC up to legal limits and, accordingly, the Bank is subject to insurance assessments based on the Bank's average consolidated total assets less its average tangible equity. The Bank's regular assessments are determined by its risk classification, which is based on its regulatory capital levels and the level of supervisory concern that it poses. Numerous bank failures during the financial crisis and increases in the statutory deposit insurance limits increased resolution costs to the FDIC and put significant pressure on the Deposit Insurance Fund. In order to maintain a strong funding position and the reserve ratios of the Deposit Insurance Fund required by statute and FDIC estimates of projected requirements, the FDIC has the power to increase deposit insurance assessment rates and impose special assessments on all FDIC-insured financial institutions. Any future increases or special assessments could reduce our profitability andturn, could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.


Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments

None.

Item 2. Properties

Our executive offices and the main office of the Bank are located at 11325 Random Hills Road, Fairfax, Virginia, 22030. In addition to our main office, we also maintain 11nine additional branch offices in Arlington, Virginia; Ashburn, Loudoun County, Virginia; the independent city of Manassas, Virginia; Reston, Fairfax County, Virginia; and Springfield, Fairfax County, Virginia; Montgomery County and Baltimore, Maryland.Maryland; and Washington, D.C. We also maintain an operations center in Manassas. We lease all but one of our office properties. We ownlocation; our branch located in Baltimore, Maryland. We also lease a loan production office in Lutherville,Towson, Maryland.

We are committed to being highly selective in our branching decisions, and we intend to continue to explore opportunities for establishing additional strategically located branches in the Washington and Baltimore MSAs based primarily on commercial deposit and loan potential and demographic support. We typically establish branches as necessary to provide support for established business development people and lendersprofessionals with substantial books of business and customer relationships.

We believe that upon expiration of each of our leases we will be able to extend the leases on satisfactory terms or relocate to another acceptable location.


Item 3. Legal Proceedings

In the ordinary course of our operations, we become party to various legal proceedings. Currently, we are not party to any material legal proceedings, and no such proceedings are, to management's knowledge, threatened against us.

Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures

None.


32


Table of Contents


PART II

Item 5. Market for Registrant's Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

Market Price for Common Stock and Dividends. Our common stock is currently quotedlisted on the Nasdaq Capital Market under the symbol "FVCB." As of March 18, 2020,15, 2023, there were 529455 holders of record of our common stock and approximately 9531,667 total beneficial shareholders.

Dividends

To date, we have not paid, and we do not currently intend to pay, a cash dividend on our common stock. Holders of our common stock are only entitled to receive dividends when, as and if declared by our board of directors out of funds legally available for dividends. As we are a bank holding company and do not engage directly in business activities of a material nature, our ability to pay dividends on our common stock depends, in large part, upon our receipt of dividends from the Bank. Any future determination relating to our dividend policy will be made by our board of directors and will depend on a number of factors, including general and economic conditions, industry standards, our financial condition and operating results, our available cash and current and anticipated cash needs, capital requirements, our ability to service debt obligations senior to our common stock, banking regulations, contractual, legal, tax and regulatory restrictions, and limitations on the payment of dividends by us to our shareholders or by the Bank to us, and such other factors as our board of directors may deem relevant.

Regulations of the Federal Reserve and Virginia law place limits on the amount of dividends the Bank may pay to the Company without prior approval. Prior regulatory approval is required to pay dividends which exceed the Bank's net profits for the current year plus its retained net profits for the preceding two calendar years, less required transfers to surplus. Under Virginia law, dividends may only be paid out of retained earnings. State and federal bank regulatory agencies also have authority to prohibit a bank from paying dividends if such payment is deemed to be an unsafe or unsound practice, and the Federal Reserve has the same authority over bank holding companies. Under Virginia law, the Company generally may not pay dividends or distributions to holders of common stock if it would be unable to pay its debts as they become due in the ordinary course of business or if its total assets would be less than the sum of its total liabilities plus the amount of the liquidation preference of any class of shares with superior rights than the common stock.

The Federal Reserve has established requirements with respect to the maintenance of appropriate levels of capital by registered bank holding companies. Compliance with such standards, as presently in effect, or as they may be amended from time to time, could possibly limit the amount of dividends that the Company may pay in the future. The Federal Reserve has issued guidance on the payment of cash dividends by bank holding companies. In the statement, the Federal Reserve expressed its view that a holding company experiencing earnings weaknesses should not pay cash dividends exceeding its net income, or which could only be funded in ways that weaken the holding company's financial health, such as by borrowing. Under Federal Reserve guidance, as a general matter, the board of directors of a holding company should inform the Federal Reserve and should eliminate, defer, or significantly reduce the dividends if: (i) the holding company's net income available to shareholders for the past four quarters, net of dividends previously paid during that period, is not sufficient to fully fund the dividends; (ii) the holding company's prospective rate of earnings retention is not consistent with the capital needs and overall current and prospective financial condition; or (iii) the holding company will not meet, or is in danger of not meeting, its minimum regulatory capital adequacy ratios. As a depository institution, the deposits of which are insured by the FDIC, the Bank may not pay dividends or distribute any of its capital assets while it remains in default on any assessment due the FDIC. The Bank currently is not in default under any of its obligations to the FDIC.


TableOn December 15, 2022, the Company announced that the Board of Contents

Repurchases

        No shares were repurchased duringDirectors approved a five-for-four split of the three months ended DecemberCompany's common stock in the form of a 25% stock dividend for shareholders of record on January 9, 2023, payable on January 31, 2019.

2023.

Repurchases
On February 4, 2020,March 17, 2022, we publicly announced that the Board of Directors had adopted a program to repurchase up to 1,112,1651,351,075 shares of our common stock, or approximately 8% of our outstanding shares of common stock at December 31, 2019.2021, from April 1, 2022 to March 31, 2023. The timing and amount of repurchases, if any, will depend on market conditions, share price, trading volume, and other factors, and there is no assurance that we will purchase shares during any period. The repurchase program will expire on December 31, 2020, subject to earlier termination of the program by the board of directors. Shares may be repurchased in the open market or through privately negotiated transactions. SinceFor the inceptionyear ended
38

Table of the program, we have purchased 471,254Contents
December 31, 2022, 37,454 shares of our common stock were repurchased at a total cost of $7.1 million.$730 thousand under the program. All of these shares have been cancelled and returned to the status of authorized but unissued.


Period(a)    Total Number of Shares Purchased(b)    Average Price Paid per Share ($)(c)    Total Number of Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Program(d)    Maximum Number of Shares that May Yet Be Purchased Under the Program
October 1 - October 31, 2022
November 1 - November 30, 2022
December 1 - December 31, 202237,4541437,4541,313,621
Total37,4541437,4541,313,621

Table of Contents


Item 6. Selected Financial Data

Selected Financial Data
(Dollars and shares in thousands, except per share data)

 
 Years Ended December 31, 
 
 2019 2018 2017 2016 2015 

Income Statement Data:

                

Interest income

 $66,734 $51,924 $40,302 $32,587 $26,557 

Interest expense

  18,671  12,110  8,195  5,387  3,665 

Net interest income

  48,063  39,814  32,107  27,200  22,892 

Provision for loan losses

  1,720  1,920  1,200  1,471  1,073 

Net interest income after provision for loan losses

  46,343  37,894  30,907  25,729  21,819 

Non-interest income

  2,546  1,661  2,975  1,220  1,161 

Non-interest expense

  28,877  26,448  19,346  16,446  14,701 

Net income before income taxes

  20,012  13,107  14,536  10,503  8,279 

Provision for income taxes

  4,184  2,238  6,846  3,571  2,860 

Net income

 $15,828 $10,869 $7,690 $6,932 $5,419 

Balance Sheet Data:

                

Total assets

 $1,537,295 $1,351,576 $1,053,224 $909,305 $736,807 

Loans receivable, net of fees

  1,270,526  1,136,743  888,677  768,102  623,559 

Allowance for loan losses

  (10,231) (9,159) (7,725) (6,452) (6,239)

Total investment securities

  141,589  125,298  117,712  113,988  67,795 

Total deposits

  1,285,722  1,162,440  928,163  775,991  626,640 

Other borrowed funds

  49,487  24,407  24,327  51,247  35,650 

Total shareholders' equity

  179,078  158,336  98,283  79,811  72,752 

Common shares outstanding

  13,902  13,713  10,869  10,179  10,141 

Per Common Share Data:

  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
 

Basic net income

 $1.15 $0.93 $0.74 $0.68 $0.54 

Fully diluted net income

  1.07  0.85  0.67  0.63  0.51 

Book value

  12.88  11.55  9.04  7.84  7.18 

Tangible book value(1)

  12.26  10.93  9.03  7.83  7.16 

Performance Ratios:

  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
 

Return on average assets

  1.09% 0.94% 0.80% 0.88% 0.85%

Return on average equity

  9.32  9.29  8.63  8.91  7.70 

Net interest margin(2)

  3.48  3.51  3.43  3.51  3.66 

Efficiency ratio(3)

  57.06  63.07  57.16  58.02  61.29 

Non-interest income to average assets

  0.18  0.14  0.31  0.15  0.18 

Non-interest expense to average assets

  1.99  2.28  2.02  2.08  2.30 

Loans receivable, net of fees to total deposits

  98.82  97.79  95.75  98.98  99.51 

Asset Quality Ratios:

  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
 

Net charge-offs (recoveries) to average loans receivable, net of fees

  0.05% 0.05% (0.01)% 0.19% 0.07%

Nonperforming loans to loans receivable, net of fees

  0.84  0.34  0.09  0.03  0.41 

Nonperforming assets to total assets

  0.95  0.57  0.44  0.03  0.35 

Allowance for loan losses to nonperforming loans

  95.39  285.24  979.09  2,591.16  243.81 

Allowance for loan losses to loans receivable, net of fees

  0.81  0.81  0.87  0.84  1.00 

Capital Ratios (Bank Only):

  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
 

Tier 1 risk-based capital

  12.72% 13.27% 12.05% 12.37% 11.25%

Total risk-based capital

  13.43  14.02  12.83  13.16  12.20 

Common Equity Tier 1 capital

  12.72  13.27  12.05  12.37  11.25 

Leverage capital ratio

  12.15  12.41  11.79  11.89  10.82 

Other:

  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
 

Average shareholders' equity to average total assets

  11.71% 10.09% 9.32% 9.85% 11.03%

Average loans receivable, net of fees to average total deposits

  98.56% 96.56% 97.74% 96.05% 97.83%

Average common shares outstanding:

                

Basic

  13,817  11,715  10,435  10,170  10,138 

Diluted

  14,825  12,822  11,545  10,922  10,591 

(1)
Tangible book value is calculated as total shareholders' equity, less goodwill and other intangible assets, divided by common shares outstanding.

Table of Contents

(2)
Net interest margin is calculated as net interest income divided by total average earning assets.

(3)
Efficiency ratio is calculated as total non-interest expense divided by the total of net interest income and non-interest income.
Reserved
 
 Years Ended December 31, 
Non-GAAP Reconciliation
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
 2019 2018 2017 2016 2015 

Total shareholders' equity

 $179,078 $158,336 $98,283 $79,811 $72,752 

Less: goodwill and intangibles, net

  (8,689) (8,443) (99) (119) (139)

Tangible Common Equity

 $170,389 $149,893 $98,184 $79,692 $72,613 

Book value per common share

 $12.88 $11.55 $9.04 $7.84 $7.18 

Less: intangible book value per common share

  (0.62) (0.62) (0.01) (0.01) (0.02)

Tangible book value per common share

 $12.26 $10.93 $9.03 $7.83 $7.16 

Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations


The following presents management's discussion and analysis of our consolidated financial condition at December 31, 20192022 and 20182021 and the results of our operations for the years ended December 31, 20192022 and 2018.2021. This discussion should be read in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements and the notes thereto appearing elsewhere in this report.

In addition to historical information, this discussion contains forward-looking statements that involve risks, uncertainties and assumptions that could cause results to differ materially from management's expectations.

Cautionary Note About Forward-Looking Statements

        We make certain forward-looking statements in this Form 10-K that are subject to risks and uncertainties. These forward-looking statements represent plans, estimates, objectives, goals, guidelines, expectations, intentions, projections and statements of our beliefs concerning future events, business plans, objectives, expected operating results and the assumptions upon which those statements are based. Forward-looking statements include without limitation, any statement that may predict, forecast, indicate or imply future results, performance or achievements, and are typically identified with words such as "may," "could," "should," "will," "would," "believe," "anticipate," "estimate," "expect," "aim," "intend," "plan," or words or phases of similar meaning. We caution that the forward-looking statements are based largely on our expectations and are subject to a number of known and unknown risks and uncertainties that are subject to change based on factors which are, in many instances, beyond our control. Actual results, performance or achievements could differ materially from those contemplated, expressed or implied by the forward-looking statements.

        The following factors, among others, could cause our financial performance to differ materially from that expressed in such forward-looking statements:


Table of Contents

        The foregoing factors should not be considered exhaustive and should be read together with other cautionary statements that are included in this Form 10-K, including those discussed in the section entitled "Risk Factors" in Item 1A above. If one or more of the factors affecting our forward-looking information and statements proves incorrect, then our actual results, performance or achievements could differ materially from those expressed in, or implied by, forward-looking information and statements contained in this Form 10-K. Therefore, we caution you not to place undue reliance on our forward-looking information and statements. We will not update the forward-looking statements to reflect actual results or changes in the factors affecting the forward-looking statements. New risks and uncertainties may emerge from time to time, and it is not possible for us to predict their occurrence or how they will affect us.


Overview

Table of Contents

Overview

We are a bank holding company headquartered in Fairfax County, Virginia. Our sole subsidiary, FVCbank, was formed in November 2007 as a community-oriented, locally-owned and managed commercial bank under the laws of the Commonwealth of Virginia. The Bank offers a wide range of traditional bank loan and deposit products and services to both our commercial and retail customers. Our commercial relationship officers focus on attracting small and medium sized businesses, commercial real estate developers and builders, including government contractors, non-profit organizations, and professionals. Our approach to our market features competitive customized financial services offered to customers and prospects in a personal relationship context by seasoned professionals.

On October 12, 2018, we announced the completion ofcompleted our acquisition of Colombo, pursuant to a previously announced definitive merger agreement.Colombo. Colombo, which was headquartered in Rockville, Maryland, merged into FVCbank effective October 12, 2018, adding five banking locations in Washington, D.C., and Montgomery County and the City of Baltimore in Maryland. Pursuant
On August 31, 2021, we announced that the Bank made an investment in ACM for $20.4 million to obtain a 28.7% ownership interest in ACM. This ownership interest is subject to an earnback option of up to 3.7% over the termsnext three years, and our investment had decreased to 27.7% as of December 31, 2022. In addition, the merger agreement, based onBank provides a warehouse lending facility to ACM, which includes a construction-to-permanent financing line, and has developed portfolio mortgage products to diversify our held to investment loan portfolio.
On December 15, 2022, the average closing priceCompany announced that the Board of Directors approved a five-for-four split of the Company's common stock duringin the five trading day period endedform of a 25% stock dividend for shareholders of record on October 10, 2018,January 9, 2023, payable on January 31, 2023. Earnings per share and all other per share information reflected herein have been adjusted for the second trading day prior to closing, of $19.614 (the "Average Closing Price") holders of shares of Colombo common stock received 0.002217 sharesfive-for-four split of the Company's common stock and $0.053157 in cash for each share of Colombo common stock held immediately prior to the effective date of the merger, plus cash in lieu of fractional shares at a rate equal to the Average Closing Price, and subject to the right of holders of Colombo common stock who owned fewer than 45,086 shares of Colombo common stock after aggregation of all shares held in the same name, and who made a timely election, to receive only cash in an amount equal to $0.096649 per share of Colombo common stock. As a result of the merger, 763,051 shares of the Company's common stock were issued in exchange for outstanding shares of Colombo common stock.

comparative purposes.

Net interest income is our primary source of revenue. We define revenue as net interest income plus noninterestnon-interest income. As discussed further in "Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk" below, weWe manage our balance sheet and interest rate risk exposure to maximize, and concurrently stabilize, net interest income. We do this by monitoring our liquidity position and the spread between the interest rates earned on interest-earning assets and the interest rates paid on interest-bearing liabilities. We attempt to minimize our exposure to interest rate risk, but are unable to eliminate it entirely. In addition to managing interest rate risk, we also analyze our loan portfolio for exposure to credit risk. Loan defaults and foreclosures are inherent risks in the banking industry, and we attempt to limit
39

Table of Contents
our exposure to these risks by carefully underwriting and then monitoring our extensions of credit. In addition to net interest income, noninterestnon-interest income is a complementary source of revenue for us and includes, among other things, service charges on deposits and loans, income from minority membership interest in ACM, merchant services fee income, insurance commission income, income from bank owned life insurance or BOLI,("BOLI"), and gains and losses on sales of investment securities available-for-sale.

Critical Accounting Policies

General

The accounting principles we apply under GAAP are complex and require management to apply significant judgment to various accounting, reporting and disclosure matters. Management must use assumptions, judgments and estimates when applying these principles where precise measurements are not possible or practical. These policies are critical because they are highly dependent upon subjective or complex judgments, assumptions and estimates. Changes in such judgments, assumptions and estimates may have a significant impact on the consolidated financial statements. Actual results, in fact, could differ from initial estimates.


Table of Contents

The accounting policies we view as critical are those relating to judgments, assumptions and estimates regarding the determination of the allowance for loan losses, accounting for purchase credit-impaired loans, and fair value measurements, and the valuation of other real estate owned.

measurements.

Allowance for Loan Losses

We maintain the allowance for loan losses at a level that represents management's best estimate of known and inherent losses in our loan portfolio. We were not required to implement the provisions of the CECL until January 1, 2023, and are were accounting for the allowance for loan losses under an incurred loss model as of December 31, 2022. Both the amount of the provision expense and the level of the allowance for loan losses are impacted by many factors, including general and industry-specific economic conditions, actual and expected credit losses, historical trends and specific conditions of individual borrowers. Unusual and infrequently occurring events, such as weather-related disasters and health related events, such as the recent coronavirus outbreakCOVID-19 pandemic and associated efforts to restrict the spread of the disease, may impact our assessment of possible credit losses. As a part of our analysis, we use comparative peer group data and qualitative factors such as levels of and trends in delinquencies, nonaccrual loans, charged-off loans, changes in volume and terms of loans, effects of changes in lending policy, experience and ability and depth of management, national and local economic trends and conditions and concentrations of credit, competition, and loan review results to support estimates.

The allowance for loan losses is based first on a segmentation of the loan portfolio by general loan type, or portfolio segments. For originated loans, certain portfolio segments are further disaggregated and evaluated collectively for impairment based on loan segments, which are largely based on the type of collateral underlying each loan. For purposes of this analysis, we categorize loans into one of five categories: commercial and industrial, commercial real estate, commercial construction, consumer residential, and consumer nonresidential loans. Typically, financial institutions use their historical loss experience and trends in losses for each loan category which are then adjusted for portfolio trends and economic and environmental factors in determining their allowance for loan losses. Since the Bank's inception in 2007, we have experienced minimal loss history within our loan portfolio. Because of this, our allowance model uses the average loss rates of similar institutions (our custom peer group) as a baseline which is then adjusted based on our particular qualitative loan portfolio characteristics and environmental factors. The indicated loss factors resulting from this analysis are applied for each of the five categories of loans.

Our peer group is defined by selecting commercial banking institutions of similar size within Virginia, Maryland and the District of Columbia. This is known as our custom peer group. The commercial banking institutions comprising the custom peer group can change based on certain factors including but not limited to the characteristics, size, and geographic footprint of the institution. We have identified 2416 banks for our custom peer group which are within $1 billion to $3 billion in total assets, the majority of whom are geographically concentrated in the Washington, D.C. metropolitan area in which we operate, as this area has experienced more stable economic conditions than many other areas of the country. These baseline peer group loss rates are then adjusted based on an analysis of our loan portfolio characteristics, trends, economic considerations and other conditions that should be considered in assessing our credit risk. Our peer loss rates are updated on a quarterly basis.

The allowance for loan losses consists of specific and general components. The specific component relates to loans that are determined to be impaired and, therefore, individually evaluated for impairment. We individually assign loss
40

Table of Contents
factors to all loans that have been identified as having loss attributes, as indicated by deterioration in the financial condition of the borrower or a decline in underlying collateral value if the loan is collateral dependent. We evaluate the impairment of certain loans on a loan by loan basis for those loans that are adversely risk rated. Measurement of impairment is based on the expected future cash flows of an impaired loan, which are discounted at the loan's effective interest rate, or measured on an observable market value, if one exists, or the fair value of the collateral underlying the loan, discounted to consider estimated costs to sell the collateral for collateral-dependent loans. If the net collateral value is less than the loan balance (including accrued interest and


Table of Contents

any unamortized premium or discount associated with the loan) we recognize an impairment and establish a specific reserve for the impaired loan.

Credit losses are an inherent part of our business and, although we believe the methodologies for determining the allowance for loan losses and the current level of the allowance are appropriate, it is possible that there may be unidentified losses in the portfolio at any particular time that may become evident at a future date pursuant to additional internal analysis or regulatory comment. Additional provisions for such losses, if necessary, would be recorded, and would negatively impact earnings.

Allowance for Loan Losses—Acquired Loans

        For our acquired loans, to the extent that we experience a deterioration in borrower credit quality resulting in a decrease in our expected cash flows subsequent to the acquisition of the loans, an allowance for loan losses would be established based on our estimate of future credit losses over the remaining life of the loans.

        Subsequent to the acquisition date, we establish our allowance for loan losses through a provision for loan losses based upon an evaluation process that is similar to our evaluation process used for originated loans. This evaluation, which includes a review of loans on which full collectability may not be reasonably assured, considers, among other factors, the estimated fair value of the underlying collateral, economic conditions, historical net loan loss experience, carrying value of the loans, which includes the remaining net purchase discount or premium, and other factors that warrant recognition in determining our allowance for loan losses.

Purchased Credit-Impaired Loans

        Purchased credit-impaired ("PCI") loans, which are the loans acquired in our acquisition of Colombo, are loans acquired at a discount (that is due, in part, to credit quality). These loans are initially recorded at fair value (as determined by the present value of expected future cash flows) with no allowance for loan losses. We account for interest income on all loans acquired at a discount (that is due, in part, to credit quality) based on the acquired loans' expected cash flows. The acquired loans may be aggregated and accounted for as a pool of loans if the loans being aggregated have common risk characteristics. A pool is accounted for as a single asset with a single composite interest rate and an aggregate expectation of cash flow. The difference between the cash flows expected at acquisition and the investment in the loans, or the "accretable yield," is recognized as interest income utilizing the level-yield method over the life of each pool. Increases in expected cash flows subsequent to the acquisition are recognized prospectively through adjustment of the yield on the pool over its remaining life, while decreases in expected cash flows are recognized as impairment through a loss provision and an increase in the allowance for loan losses. Therefore, the allowance for loan losses on these impaired pools reflect only losses incurred after the acquisition (representing the present value of all cash flows that were expected at acquisition but currently are not expected to be received). At December 31, 2019, we had a specific reserve for impairment of one acquired loan within our allowance for loan losses totaling $29 thousand that had further deteriorated post acquisition.

        We periodically evaluate the remaining contractual required payments due and estimates of cash flows expected to be collected. These evaluations, performed quarterly, require the continued use of key assumptions and estimates, similar to the initial estimate of fair value. Changes in the contractual required payments due and estimated cash flows expected to be collected may result in changes in the accretable yield and non-accretable difference or reclassifications between accretable yield and the non-accretable difference. On an aggregate basis, if the acquired pools of PCI loans perform better


Table of Contents

than originally expected, we would expect to receive more future cash flows than originally modeled at the acquisition date. For the pools with better than expected cash flows, the forecasted increase would be recorded as an additional accretable yield that is recognized as a prospective increase to our interest income on loans.

Fair Value Measurements

We determine the fair values of financial instruments based on the fair value hierarchy, which requires an entity to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value. The standard describes three levels of inputs that may be used to measure fair value. Our investment securities available-for-sale are recorded at fair value using reliable and unbiased evaluations by an industry-wide valuation service. This service uses evaluated pricing models that vary based on asset class and include available trade, bid, and other market information. Generally, the methodology includes broker quotes, proprietary models, vast descriptive terms and conditions databases, as well as extensive quality control programs. Depending on the availability of observable inputs and prices, different valuation models could produce materially different fair value estimates. The values presented may not represent future fair values and may not be realizable.

Other Real Estate Owned

        Real estate acquired through, or in lieu of, foreclosure is held for sale and is stated at fair value of the property, less estimated disposal costs, if any. Any excess of cost over the fair value less costs to sell at the time of acquisition is charged to the allowance for loan losses. The fair value is reviewed periodically by management and any writedowns are charged against current earnings. Accounting policy and treatment is consistent with accounting for impaired loans described above.

LIBOR and Other Benchmark Rates

        Following


We have certain loans, interest rate swap agreements, investment securities, and debt obligations with interest rates indexed to LIBOR. The administrator of LIBOR announced that the announcement by the United Kingdom's Financial Conduct Authority in July 2017 that it will no longer require banksmost commonly used U.S. dollar LIBOR settings would cease to submit rates for the London InterBank Offered Rate (LIBOR)be published or cease to be representative after 2021, centralJune 30, 2023. Central banks and regulators around the world have commissioned working groups to find suitable replacements for Interbank Offered Rates (IBOR)("IBOR") and other benchmark rates and to implement financial benchmark reforms more generally. These actions have resulted inThere continues to be uncertainty regarding the use of alternative reference rates (ARRs) and could("ARRs"), which may cause disruptions in a variety of markets, as well as adversely impact our business, operations and financial results.


The Adjustable Interest Rate (LIBOR) Act, enacted in March 2022, provides a statutory framework to replace LIBOR with a benchmark rate based on SOFR for contracts governed by U.S. law that have no or ineffective fallbacks. Although governmental authorities have endeavored to facilitate an orderly discontinuation of LIBOR, no assurance can be provided that this aim will be achieved or that the use, level, and volatility of LIBOR or other interest rates, or the value of LIBOR-based securities will not be adversely affected.
To facilitate an orderly transition from IBORs and other benchmark rates to ARRs, we have established an enterprise-wide initiative led by senior management. The objective of this initiative is to identify, assess and monitor risks associated with the expected discontinuation or unavailability of benchmarks, including LIBOR, achieve operational readiness and engage impacted clients in connection with the transition to ARRs.

To mitigate the risks associated with the expected discontinuation of LIBOR, we have ceased originating LIBOR-linked loans, implemented fallback language for LIBOR-linked commercial loans, adhered to the International Swaps and Derivatives Association 2020 Fallbacks Protocol for interest rate swap agreements, and have updated our systems to accommodate loans linked to SOFR. In accordance with regulatory guidance, we ceased entering into new LIBOR transactions at the end of 2021 and have selected SOFR, as the rate that best represents an alternative to LIBOR. Uncertainty as to the adoption, market acceptance or availability of SOFR or other alternative reference rates may adversely affect the value of LIBOR-based loans and securities in our portfolio and may impact the availability and cost of hedging instruments and borrowings.

41

Table of Contents
Financial Overview

For the years ended December 31, 20192022 and 2018,2021, we continued to expandexpanded our market area through continued organic growth, and acquisition, and have continued to leverage our acquisition of Colombo while capitalizing on market disruption as a resultnew customer relationships we obtained through centers of recent merger activity within the Washington MSA.

Total assets increased to $1.54$2.34 billion compared to $1.35$2.20 billion as ofat December 31, 20192022 and 2018,2021, respectively, an increase of $185.7$141.4 million, or 13.7%6%.
The increase in total assets is primarily attributable to our record loan growth during 2022.

Table of Contents

Net interest income increased $7.3 million, or 13%, to $65.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2022 compared to the year ended December 31, 2021. While loan growth resulted in interest income increasing $12.3 million, despite the $4.8 million reduction in PPP interest and fees, it was partially offset by the $5.0 million increase in interest expense. Excluding PPP interest and fees, net interest income increased $17.1 million or 27% for the current year compared to the prior year. The net interest margin for 2022 was 3.19% compared to 3.09% for 2021.
The provision for loan losses for 2022 totaled $2.6 million compared to a reversal of provision totaling $500 thousand in 2021. The provision for loan losses for 2022 was a reflection of the growth in the loan portfolio. The credit to the provision for loan losses for the prior year was a reflection of improved credit quality in the loan portfolio during 2021 as economic activity improved due to the resumption of business activity previously stalled by the COVID-19 pandemic.
Noninterest income for 2022 decreased to $2.8 million compared to $4.3 million for 2021. This decrease was primarily driven by the loss recorded for our portion of membership interest in ACM of $659 thousand compared to income of $1.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2021.
Noninterest expense was $34.5 million for each of the years ended December 31, 2022 and 2021. When excluding the aforementioned merger-related expenses, noninterest expense for the years ended December 31, 2022 and 2021 was $34.3 million and $33.1 million, respectively, an increase of $1.2 million, or 4%.
42

Table of Contents
Reconciliation of Net Income (GAAP) to Operating Earnings (Non-GAAP)
Years Ended December 31, 20192022 and 2018
2021
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)

20222021
Net income (as reported)$24,984 $21,933 
Add: merger and acquisition expense125 1,445 
Add: Accelerated debt issuance costs— 380 
Subtract: Gains on sales of other real estate owned— (236)
Subtract: provision for income taxes associated with impairment and merger and acquisition expense(28)(358)
Non-GAAP Operating Earnings, excluding above items$25,081 $23,164 
Earnings per share - basic (GAAP net income)$1.43 $1.29 
Earnings per share - Non-GAAP expenses including provision for income taxes$0.01 $0.07 
Earnings per share - basic (non-GAAP operating earnings)$1.44 $1.36 
Earnings per share - diluted (GAAP net income)$1.35 $1.20 
Earnings per share - Non-GAAP expenses including provision for income taxes$0.01 $0.07 
Earnings per share - diluted (non-GAAP operating earnings)$1.36 $1.27 
Return on average assets (GAAP net income)1.18 %1.11 %
Non-GAAP expenses including provision for income taxes— %0.06 %
Return on average assets (non‑GAAP operating earnings)1.18 %1.17 %
Return on average equity (GAAP net income)12.34 %10.92 %
Non-GAAP expenses including provision for income taxes0.05 %0.61 %
Return on average equity (non‑GAAP operating earnings)12.39 %11.53 %














43

Table of Contents
 
 2019 2018 

Net income (as reported)

 $15,828 $10,869 

Add: merger and acquisition expense

  133  3,339 

Less: provision for income taxes associated with merger and acquisition expense

  (31) (788)

Net income, excluding above non-GAAP items

 $15,930 $13,420 

Earnings per share—basic (net income, as adjusted)

 $1.15 $1.15 

Earnings per share—diluted (net income, as adjusted)

 $1.07 $1.05 

Return on average assets (non-GAAP net income)

  1.10% 1.16%

Return on average equity (non-GAAP net income)

  9.38% 11.47%
Below shows selected financial data for the periods ended December 31, 2022 and 2021.

Selected Financial Data
(Dollars and shares in thousands, except per share data)
Years Ended December 31,
Income Statement Data:20222021
Interest income$80,682 $68,428 
Interest expense15,438 10,481 
Net interest income65,244 57,947 
Provision for (reversal of) loan losses2,629 (500)
Net interest income after provision for (reversal of) loan losses62,615 58,447 
Non‑interest income2,834 4,302 
Non‑interest expense34,460 34,540 
Net income before income taxes30,989 28,209 
Provision for income taxes6,005 6,276 
Net income$24,984 $21,933 
Balance Sheet Data: 
Total assets$2,344,322 $2,202,924 
Loans receivable, net of fees1,840,434 1,503,849 
Allowance for loan losses(16,040)(13,829)
Total investment securities278,333 358,038 
Total deposits1,830,162 1,883,769 
Other borrowed funds284,565 44,510 
Total shareholders' equity202,382 209,796 
Common shares outstanding17,476 13,727 
Per Common Share Data(1):
 
Basic net income$1.43 $1.29 
Fully diluted net income1.35 1.20 
Book value11.58 12.23 
Tangible book value(2)
11.14 11.76 
Performance Ratios: 
Return on average assets1.18 %1.11 %
Return on average equity12.34 10.92 
Net interest margin(3)
3.19 3.09 
Efficiency ratio(4)
50.62 55.49 
Non‑interest income to average assets0.13 0.22 
Non‑interest expense to average assets1.62 1.75 
Loans receivable, net of fees to total deposits100.56 79.83 
Asset Quality Ratios: 
Net charge‑offs (recoveries) to average loans receivable, net of fees0.03 %0.04 %
Nonperforming loans to loans receivable, net of fees0.24 0.23 
Nonperforming assets to total assets0.19 0.16 
Allowance for loan losses to nonperforming loans357.00 394.21 
Allowance for loan losses to loans receivable, net of fees0.87 0.92 
Capital Ratios (Bank Only): 
Tier 1 risk‑based capital13.28 %13.54 %
Total risk‑based capital12.4512.72
Common Equity Tier 1 capital12.4512.72
Leverage capital ratio10.75 10.55 
Other: 
Average shareholders' equity to average total assets9.53 %10.15 %
Average loans receivable, net of fees to average total deposits86.7786.80
Average common shares outstanding (1):
 
Basic17,431 17,062 
Diluted18,484 18,227 
44

Table of Contents
_________________________
(1)Amounts for all periods reflect the effect of a 5-for-4 stock split declared on December 15, 2022.
(2)Tangible book value is calculated as total stockholders' equity, less goodwill and other intangible assets, divided by common shares outstanding.
(3)Net interest margin is calculated as net interest income divided by total average earning assets.
(4)Efficiency ratio is calculated as total non-interest expense divided by the total of net interest income and non-interest income.

Years Ended December 31,
Non‑GAAP Reconciliation
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)20222021
Total stockholders' equity$202,382 $209,796 
Less: goodwill and intangibles, net(7,790)(8,052)
Tangible Common Equity$194,592 $201,744 
Book value per common share$11.58$12.23
Less: intangible book value per common share(0.44)(0.47)
Tangible book value per common share$11.14$11.76
Results of Operations—Years Ended December 31, 20192022 and December 31, 2018

2021

Overview

We recorded record net income of $15.8$25.0 million, or $1.07$1.35 per diluted common share, for the year ended December 31, 2019,2022, compared to net income of $10.9$21.9 million, or $0.85$1.20 per diluted common share for the year ended December 31, 2018.2021. Our 20192022 results were impacted by additionalmerger-related expenses related to our acquisition of Colombo totaling $102 thousand, net of tax, in 2019. Excluding these$125 thousand. Our 2021 results were impacted by merger-related expenses totaling $1.4 million. We also recorded one-time accelerated debt issuance costs of $380 thousand associated with our redemption of our 2016 subordinated debt issuance during the third quarter of 2021 and a gain on the sale of OREO of $236 thousand. Excluding the merger-related expenses, accelerated debt issuance costs and gain on OREO and their related tax effects, we would have recorded net income of $15.9$25.1 million, or $1.07$1.36 per diluted common share, for the year ended December 31, 2019. Our 2018 results were impacted by additional expenses related to our acquisition of Colombo totaling $2.6 million, net of tax, in 2018. Excluding these merger-related expenses, we would have recorded income of $13.42022, and $23.2 million, or $1.05$1.27 per diluted common share, for the year ended December 31, 2018.


Table2021. See above table for a reconciliation of Contents

GAAP net income to operating earnings (non-GAAP).

Net interest income increased $8.2$7.3 million to $48.1$65.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2019,2022, compared to $39.8$57.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2018, primarily as2021. For the year ended December 31, 2022, we recorded a result of an increase in interest-earning assets. Provisionprovision for loan losses of $2.6 million due to continued loan growth compared to a reversal of $500 thousand during 2021 which was $1.7primarily driven by the improvement of economic conditions subsequent to the COVID-19 pandemic. Noninterest income for the year ended December 31, 2022 was $2.8 million, compared to $4.3 million for 2021, a decrease of $1.5 million, which was primarily driven by the loss recorded from our membership interest in ACM of $659 thousand for the year ended December 31, 2022, compared to income from our membership interest in ACM of $1.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2019, compared to $1.92021.
Noninterest expense was $34.5 million for each of the same period of 2018. Noninterest income increased $885 thousand to $2.5 million for the yearyears ended December 31, 2019 as compared to $1.72022 and 2021. For the years ended December 31, 2022 and 2021, noninterest expense included merger-related expenses totaling $125 thousand and $1.4 million, respectively, associated with the Company's proposed merger with Blue Ridge. When excluding merger-related expenses, noninterest expense for 2018,the years ended December 31, 2022 and 2021 was $34.3 million and $33.1 million, respectively, an increase of $1.2 million, or 4%, which was primarily as a result of an increase in service charges on deposit accounts, income related to bank-owned life insurance, and other fee income. In addition, during 2018, we recorded a loss on sales of securities available-for-sale of $462 thousand that impacted 2018 noninterest income. Noninterest expense was $28.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2019 compared to $26.4 million for the same period of 2018. Noninterest expense increased during 2019 as a direct result of the addition of Colombo to the Company's expense structure and an increases in salaries and benefits expense for strategic additionsexpenses, offset by a year-over-year decrease in professional fees of $279 thousand, which were attributable to business development and back office staffing over the past year to support our growth plans.

Company's membership interest purchase in ACM during 2021.

The return on average assets for the yearyears ended December 31, 20192022 and 20182021 was 1.09%1.18% and 0.94%1.11%, respectively. The return on average equity for the yearyears ended December 31, 20192022 and 20182021 was 9.32%12.34% and 9.29%10.92%, respectively. Excluding merger-related expenses and associated taxes recorded during 2019,The return on average assets for the years ended December 31, 2022 and 2021 based on operating earnings (a non-GAAP metric) was 1.18% and 1.17%, respectively. The return on average equity for the yearyears ended December 31, 2019 would have been 1.10%2022 and 9.38%2021
45

Table of Contents
based on operating earnings (a non-GAAP metric) was 12.39% and 11.53%, respectively. Excluding merger-related expenses and associated taxes recorded during 2018, return on average assets and return on average equitySee the above table for the year ended December 31, 2018 would have been 1.16% and 11.47%, respectively.

a reconciliation of GAAP net income to operating earnings (non-GAAP).

Net Interest Income/Margin

The following table presents average balance sheet information, interest income, interest expense and the corresponding average yields earned and rates paid for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018,2022 and 2017.

2021.

Table of Contents


Average Balance Sheets and Interest Rates on Interest-Earning Assets and Interest-Bearing Liabilities

Years Ended December 31, 2019, 20182022 and 2017
2021
(Dollars in thousands)

 
 2019 2018 2017 
 
 Average
Balance
 Interest
Income/
Expense
 Average
Yield/
Rate
 Average
Balance
 Interest
Income/
Expense
 Average
Yield/
Rate
 Average
Balance
 Interest
Income/
Expense
 Average
Yield/
Rate
 

Assets

                            

Interest-earning assets:

                            

Loans(1):

                            

Commercial real estate

 $733,465 $35,174  4.80%$587,060 $27,714  4.72%$499,776 $23,250  4.65%

Commercial and industrial

  127,706  7,844  6.14% 109,475  6,174  5.64% 91,361  4,516  4.94%

Commercial construction

  192,528  10,819  5.62% 133,691  7,170  5.36% 89,156  4,399  4.93%

Consumer residential

  125,573  6,362  5.07% 113,643  5,316  4.68% 105,715  4,510  4.27%

Consumer nonresidential

  26,446  1,983  7.50% 28,014  1,842  6.58% 19,178  830  4.33%

Total loans(1)

  1,205,718  62,182  5.16% 971,883  48,216  4.96% 805,186  37,505  4.66%

Investment securities(2)

  137,263  3,550  2.59% 124,510  2,843  2.28% 113,799  2,530  2.22%

Restricted stock

  5,488  321  5.86% 4,211  291  6.92% 3,971  223  5.61%

Deposits at other financial institutions and federal funds sold

  34,104  705  2.07% 34,193  599  1.75% 13,400  90  0.68%

Total interest-earning assets and interest income

  1,382,573  66,758  4.83% 1,134,797  51,949  4.58% 936,356  40,348  4.31%

Noninterest-earning assets:

                            

Cash and due from banks

  8,606        2,683        1,924       

Premises and equipment, net

  2,134        1,555        1,367       

Accrued interest and other assets

  66,157        28,480        23,232       

Allowance for loan losses

  (9,701)       (8,266)       (6,987)      

Total assets

 $1,449,769       $1,159,249       $955,892       

Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity

                            

Interest-bearing liabilities:

                            

Interest-bearing deposits:

                            

Interest checking

 $309,938 $4,287  1.38%$182,532 $2,150  1.18%$204,422 $1,664  0.81%

Savings and money markets

  252,028  3,644  1.45% 258,462  2,680  1.04% 162,127  1,175  0.72%

Time deposits

  316,201  7,080  2.24% 265,038  4,258  1.61% 210,093  2,773  1.32%

Wholesale deposits

  74,715  1,819  2.43% 77,466  1,266  1.63% 75,534  805  1.07%

Total interest-bearing deposits

  952,882  16,830  1.77% 783,498  10,354  1.32% 652,176  6,417  0.98%

Other borrowed funds

  36,680  1,841  5.02% 32,730  1,756  5.37% 40,849  1,778  4.35%

Total interest-bearing liabilities and interest expense

  989,562  18,671  1.89% 816,228  12,110  1.48% 693,025  8,195  1.18%

Noninterest-bearing liabilities:

                            

Demand deposits

  270,397        222,972        171,649       

Other liabilities

  19,996        3,057        2,162       

Common stockholders' equity

  169,814        116,992        89,056       

Total liabilities and stockholders' equity

 $1,449,769       $1,159,249       $955,892       

Net interest income and net interest margin

    $48,087  3.48%   $39,839  3.51%   $32,153  3.43%

20222021
Average
Balance
Interest
Income/
Expense
Average
Yield/
Rate
Average
Balance
Interest
Income/
Expense
Average
Yield/
Rate
Assets
Interest‑earning assets:
Loans(1):
Commercial real estate$978,983 $42,646 4.36 %$832,138 $35,104 4.22 %
Commercial and industrial199,957 10,317 5.16 %135,017 6,127 4.54 %
Paycheck protection program9,112 592 6.50 %105,980 5,410 5.11 %
Commercial construction165,088 8,762 5.31 %209,957 9,790 4.66 %
Consumer residential255,794 10,602 4.14 %169,168 6,685 3.95 %
Consumer nonresidential9,143 705 7.71 %11,569 858 7.41 %
Total loans(1)1,618,077 73,624 4.55 %1,463,829 63,974 4.37 %
Investment securities(2)344,725 5,974 1.73 %204,952 3,878 1.89 %
Restricted stock7,339 408 5.56 %6,269 328 5.24 %
Deposits at other financial institutions74,477 685 0.92 %197,987 260 0.13 %
Total interest‑earning assets and interest income2,044,618 80,691 3.95 %1,873,037 68,440 3.65 %
Noninterest‑earning assets:   
Cash and due from banks873   18,556 
Premises and equipment, net1,410   1,578 
Accrued interest and other assets92,761   99,562 
Allowance for loan losses(14,596)  (14,513)
Total assets$2,125,066   $1,978,220 
Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity   
Interest ‑ bearing liabilities:   
Interest ‑ bearing deposits:   
Interest checking$724,881 $5,966 0.82 %$587,151 $3,224 0.55 %
Savings and money markets315,653 2,662 0.84 %303,317 1,421 0.47 %
Time deposits203,719 2,908 1.43 %230,668 2,783 1.21 %
Wholesale deposits61,478 932 1.52 %37,657 173 0.46 %
Total interest ‑ bearing deposits1,305,731 12,468 0.95 %1,158,793 7,601 0.66 %
Other borrowed funds89,834 2,970 3.31 %62,878 2,880 4.58 %
Total interest‑bearing liabilities and interest expense1,395,565 15,438 1.11 %1,221,671 10,481 0.86 %
Noninterest‑bearing liabilities:   
Demand deposits501,962   527,675 
Other liabilities25,059   27,988 
Common stockholders' equity202,480   200,886 
Total liabilities and stockholders' equity$2,125,066   $1,978,220 
Net interest income and net interest margin$65,253 3.19 %$57,959 3.09 %
________________________
(1)
Non-accrual loans are included in average balances and do not have a material effect on the average yield. Interest income on non-accruing loans was not material for the years presented.

46

Table of Contents
(2)
The average yields for investment securities are reported on a fully taxable-equivalent basis at a rate of 22.5% for 2019, 21% for 2018,2022 and 34.5% for 2017.
2021.

The level of net interest income is affected primarily by variations in the volume and mix of these assets and liabilities, as well as changes in interest rates. See "Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk" below for further information. The following table shows the effect that these


Table of Contents

factors had on the interest earned from our interest-earning assets and interest incurred on our interest-bearing liabilities.


Rate and Volume Analysis
Years Ended December 31, 2019, 20182022 and 2017
2021
(Dollars in thousands)

 
 2019 Compared to 2018 2018 Compared to 2017 
 
 Average
Volume(3)
 Average
Rate
 Increase
(Decrease)
 Average
Volume(3)
 Average
Rate
 Increase
(Decrease)
 

Interest income:

                   

Loans(1):

                   

Commercial real estate

 $6,912 $548 $7,460 $4,061 $403 $4,464 

Commercial and industrial

  1,028  642  1,670  895  763  1,658 

Commercial construction

  3,155  494  3,649  2,197  574  2,771 

Consumer residential

  558  488  1,046  338  468  806 

Consumer nonresidential

  (103) 244  141  382  630  1,012 

Total loans(1)

  11,550  2,416  13,966  7,873  2,838  10,711 

Investment securities(2)

  287  420  707  238  75  313 

Restricted stock

  88  (58) 30  13  55  68 

Deposits at other financial institutions and federal funds sold

  (2) 108  106  143  366  509 

Total interest income

  11,923  2,886  14,809  8,267  3,334  11,601 

Interest expense:

                   

Interest-bearing deposits:

                   

Interest checking

  1,501  636  2,137  (178) 664  486 

Savings and money markets

  (67) 1,031  964  698  807  1,505 

Time deposits

  822  2,000  2,822  725  760  1,485 

Wholesale deposits

  (45) 598  553  21  440  461 

Total interest-bearing deposits

  2,211  4,265  6,476  1,266  2,671  3,937 

Other borrowed funds

  212  (127) 85  (353) 331  (22)

Total interest expense

  2,423  4,138  6,561  913  3,002  3,915 

Net interest income

 $9,500 $(1,252)$8,248 $7,354 $332 $7,686 

2022 Compared to 2021
Average
Volume(3)
Average
Rate
Increase
(Decrease)
Interest income:
Loans(1):
Commercial real estate$6,195 $1,347 $7,542 
Commercial and industrial2,947 1,243 4,190 
Paycheck protection program(4,944)126 (4,818)
Commercial construction(2,092)1,064 (1,028)
Consumer residential3,423 494 3,917 
Consumer nonresidential(180)27 (153)
Total loans(1)5,349 4,301 9,650 
Investment securities(2)2,645 (549)2,096 
Restricted stock56 24 80 
Deposits at other financial institutions(162)587 425 
Total interest income7,888 4,363 12,251 
Interest expense:
Interest - bearing deposits:
Interest checking756 1,986 2,742 
Savings and money markets58 1,183 1,241 
Time deposits(325)450 125 
Wholesale deposits109 650 759 
Total interest - bearing deposits598 4,269 4,867 
Other borrowed funds1,235 (1,145)90 
Total interest expense1,833 3,124 4,957 
Net interest income$6,055 $1,239 $7,294 
_________________________
(1)
Non-accrual loans are included in average balances and do not have a material effect on the average yield. Interest income on non-accruing loans was not material for the years presented.

(2)
The average yields for investment securities are reported on a fully taxable-equivalent basis at a rate of 22.5% for 2019, 21% for 20182022 and 34.5% for 2017.

(3)
Changes attributable to rate/volume have been allocated to volume.
2021.

        Net interest income for the year ended December 31, 2019 was $48.1 million on a fully taxable-equivalent basis, compared to $39.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2018, an increase of $8.2 million, or 20.7%. The increase in net interest income was primarily a result of an increase in the volume of interest-earning assets related to organic growth during 2019 compared to 2018, in addition to the earning assets acquired from Colombo. The yield on interest-earning assets increased 25 basis points to 4.83% for the year ended December 31, 2019, compared to 4.58% for the same period of 2018, a result of the increased rate environment during the first six months of 2019. Offsetting this



47

Table of Contents

increase in yields on earning assets was a 41 basis point increase in the cost of interest-bearing liabilities, reflecting the increased rates on interest-bearing deposits prior to three rate cuts during the last half of 2019.

        Our net interest margin, on a tax equivalent basis, for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018 was 3.48% and 3.51%, respectively. The decrease in our net interest margin was primarily a result of an increase in rates on our interest-bearing liabilities during 2019 as compared to 2018.


Net interest income, on a tax equivalent basis, is a financial measure that we believe provides a more accurate picture of the interest margin for comparative purposes. To derive our net interest margin on a tax equivalent basis, net interest income is adjusted to reflect tax-exempt income on an equivalent before tax basis with a corresponding increase in income tax expense. For purposes of this calculation, we use our federal and state statutory tax rates for the periods presented. This measure ensures comparability of net interest income arising from taxable and tax-exempt sources.

The following table provides a reconciliation of our GAAP net interest income to our tax equivalent net interest income.


Supplemental Financial Data and Reconciliations to GAAP Financial Measures
Years Ended December 31, 2019, 20182022 and 2017
2021
(Dollars in thousands)

20222021
GAAP Financial Measurements:
Interest income:
Loans$73,624 $63,974 
Deposits at other financial institutions685 260 
Investment securities available‑for‑sale5,959 3,860 
Investment securities held‑to‑maturity
Restricted stock408 328 
Total interest income80,682 68,428 
Interest expense:
Interest‑bearing deposits12,468 7,601 
Other borrowed funds2,970 2,880 
Total interest expense15,438 10,481 
Net interest income$65,244 $57,947 
Non‑GAAP Financial Measurements:
Add: Tax benefit on tax‑exempt interest income - securities12 
Total tax benefit on interest income$$12 
Tax equivalent net interest income$65,253 $57,959 
Net interest margin on a tax-equivalent basis3.19 %3.09 %
 
 2019 2018 2017 

GAAP Financial Measurements:

          

Interest income:

          

Loans

 $62,182 $48,216 $37,505 

Deposits at other financial institutions and federal funds sold

  705  599  90 

Investment securities available-for-sale

  3,496  2,767  2,433 

Investment securities held-to-maturity

  30  51  51 

Restricted stock

  321  291  223 

Total interest income

  66,734  51,924  40,302 

Interest expense:

          

Interest-bearing deposits

  16,830  10,354  6,417 

Other borrowed funds

  1,841  1,756  1,778 

Total interest expense

  18,671  12,110  8,195 

Net interest income

 $48,063 $39,814 $32,107 

Non-GAAP Financial Measurements:

          

Add: Tax benefit on tax-exempt interest income-securities

  24  25  46 

Total tax benefit on interest income

 $24 $25 $46 

Tax equivalent net interest income

 $48,087 $39,839 $32,153 
Net interest income for the year ended December 31, 2022 was $65.3 million on a fully taxable-equivalent basis, compared to $58.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2021, an increase of $7.3 million, or 13%. The increase in net interest income was primarily a result of an increase in interest earned on earning assets that exceeded the increase in costs of interest-bearing liabilities. We have been disciplined in our approach to rising interest rates as the Federal Open Market Committee of the Federal Reserve has enacted a contractionary monetary policy, increasing its targeted fed funds rate 425 basis points during 2022 to combat inflation.

Our net interest margin, on a tax equivalent basis, for the years ended December 31, 2022 and 2021 was 3.19% and 3.09%, respectively. The increase in our net interest margin was primarily a result of the increased rate environment during 2022, as our variable rate loan portfolio repriced and we funded loans at higher interest rates, which increased yields on interest-earning assets. The yield on interest-earning assets increased 30 basis points to 3.95% for the year ended December 31, 2022, compared to 3.65% for the same period of 2021, a result of the increased rate environment during 2022. Offsetting the increase in yields on earning assets was a 25 basis point increase in the cost of interest-bearing liabilities, which reflects the increases in funding costs during 2022.
Average interest-earning assets increased by 21.8%9% to $1.38$2.04 billion at December 31, 20192022 compared to $1.13$1.87 billion at December 31, 2018,2021, which resulted in an increase in total interest income on a tax equivalent basis of $14.8$12.3 million, to $66.8$80.7 million for the year ended December 31, 20192022 compared to $51.9$68.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2018.2021. Both average volume and rate significantly impacted interest income during 2022, with volume contributing an additional
48

$7.9 million in interest income and rate contributing an additional $4.4 million in interest income when compared to the prior year.
Average loans receivable increased $154.2 million to $1.62 billion for the year ended December 31, 2022, compared to $1.46 billion for the year ended December 31, 2021. The increase in our earning assets was primarily driven by anyield on average loans increased 18 basis points to 4.55% for the year ended December 31, 2022. The increase in average volume of loans receivable contributed $5.3 million to interest income while the increase in average rate of $233.8loans receivable contributed $4.3 million which contributed to an additional $11.6 million in interest income. This increase in interest income was enhanced by an increase in yields earned on the loan portfolio which increased interest income $2.4 million. AverageAverage balances of nonperforming loans, which consist of nonaccrual loans, are included in the net interest margin calculation and did not have a material impact on our net interest margin in 20192022 and 2018.

2021.

TableAverage investment securities increased $139.8 million to $344.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2022, compared to $205.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2021. The significant increase in average investment securities was primarily a result of Contents

the increase in liquidity at the Bank as a result of PPP loan forgiveness and payoffs, along with increases in deposit activity that was in excess of loan originations during 2021. This liquidity was invested in fixed income securities which increased interest income by $2.1 million on a tax equivalent basis for the year ended December 31, 2022. The yield on average investment securities decreased 16 basis points to 1.73% for the year ended December 31, 2022, primarily as a result of purchasing securities at lower interest rates relative to the average yield of the securities portfolio.

Average interest-earning deposits at other financial institutions, consisting primarily of excess cash reserves maintained at the Federal Reserve, decreased $123.5 million to $74.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2022, compared to $198.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2021. The significant decrease in average interest-earning deposits at other financial institutions was primarily a result of our deployment of excess liquidity during 2022 to fund loan growth. The yield on average interest-earning deposits increased 79 basis points to 0.92% for the year ended December 31, 2022.
Total average interest-bearing deposits increased $169.4$146.9 million to $952.9$1.31 billion at December 31, 2022 compared to $1.16 billion at December 31, 2021. Average noninterest-bearing deposits decreased $25.7 million, or 5%, to $502.0 million at December 31, 20192022, compared to $783.5$527.7 million at December 31, 2018. Average noninterest-bearing deposits increased $47.4 million to $270.4 million at December 31, 2019 compared to $223.0 million at December 31, 2018.2021. The largest increase in average interest-bearing deposit balances was in our interest checking accounts, which increased $127.4$137.7 million compared to 2018.2021. Average time deposits increased $51.2decreased $26.9 million to $316.2$203.7 million as of December 31, 20192022 compared to $265.0$230.7 million at December 31, 2018.2021, as customers continue to prefer short-term deposit options for liquidity purposes. Average wholesale deposits decreased $2.8increased $23.8 million to $74.7$61.5 million as of December 31, 20192022 compared to $77.5$37.7 million as of December 31, 2018. This change2021, to assist in the mix offunding our interest-bearing liabilities, in addition to the three increases in the targeted fed funds raterecord loan growth during 2019, have contributed to the increase in our cost of interest-bearing deposits to 1.77% in 2019 from 1.32% in 2018. 2022.
The cost of other borrowed funds, which include federal funds purchased, FHLB advances, and our subordinated notes, used to help fund our balance sheet growth, decreased 35127 basis points to 5.02%3.31% for the year ended December 31, 2022, from 4.58% for the same period in 2019 from 5.37% in 2018. The decrease in the cost of other borrowed funds was2021, a result of a FHLB advancereduction in subordinated debt outstanding during 2022 and the recognition of accelerated debt issuance costs of $380 thousand recorded during the third quarter of 2019 with a rate of 1.88%.

2021.

Provision Expense and Allowance for Loan Losses

Our policy is to maintain the allowance for loan losses at a level that represents our best estimate of inherent losses in the loan portfolio. Both the amount of the provision and the level of the allowance for loan losses are impacted by many factors, including general and industry-specific economic conditions, actual credit losses, historical trends and specific conditions of individual borrowers. We were not required to implement the provisions of CECL until January 1, 2023, and were accounting for the allowance for losses under the incurred loss model.

The Company adopted ASU 2016-13 as of January 1, 2023 in accordance with the required implementation date and recorded the impact of adoption to retained earnings, net of deferred income taxes, as required by the standard. The adjustment recorded at adoption was not significant to the overall allowance for credit losses or shareholders' equity as compared to December 31, 2022 and consisted of adjustments to the allowance for credit losses on loans as well as an adjustment to the Company's reserve for unfunded commitments.
We recorded a provision for loan losses of $1.7$2.6 million for the year ended December 31, 20192022 compared to a release of provision for loan losses of $1.9 million$500 thousand for the same period of 2018.year ended December 31, 2021. The allowance for loan losses at December 31, 20192022 was $10.2$16.0 million compared to $9.2$13.8 million at December 31, 2018.2021. Our allowance for loan loss ratio as a percent of total loans, net of deferred fees and costs, for each of December 31, 20192022 and 20182021 was 0.81%. During 2019, we updated certain qualitative factors0.87% and 0.92%, respectively. The increase in
49

the allowance for loan losses for the year ended December 31, 2022 was primarily related to supporting the growth recorded in the our commercial constructionloan portfolio as this portion of the portfolio entails additional credit risk during the construction phaseyear.
The Company continues to maintain its disciplined credit guidelines adding support during the current rising rate environment. The Company proactively monitors the impact of rising interest rates on its adjustable loans as the industry navigates through this economic cycle of increased inflation and higher interest rates. Credit quality metrics remained strong for 2022 with specific reserves on the loan funding. In addition, qualitative factors of our commercial real estate portfolio were adjustedtotaling $86 thousand. Net charge-offs for the limited loss rates and attributes of this portfolio. Lastly, while impaired loans increased during 2019 asyear ended December 31, 2022 were $418 thousand compared to 2018, specific reserves totaling $393$629 thousand were recorded during 2019, as these impairedfor the year ended December 31, 2021, consistent with our track record of low historical charge-offs. The allowance coverage to nonperforming loans are well secured.

decreased to 357% at December 31, 2022, compared to 394% for the year ended December 31, 2021. See "Asset Quality" section below for additional information.

information on the credit quality of the loan portfolio.

Noninterest Income

The following table provides detail for non-interest income for the years ended December 31, 20192022 and 2018.


2021.

Non-Interest Income
Years Ended December 31, 2019, 20182022 and 2017
2021
(Dollars in thousands)

Change from Prior Year
20222021AmountPercent
Service charges on deposit accounts$954 $1,028 $(74)(7.2)%
Fees on loans232 110 122 110.9 %
BOLI income1,200 994 206 20.7 %
(Loss) income from minority membership interest(33)1,464 (1,497)(102.3)%
Other fee income481 706 (225)(31.9)%
Total non‑interest income$2,834 $4,302 $(1,468)(34.1)%
 
 2019 2018 

Service charges on deposit accounts

 $890 $635 

Fees on loans

  582  722 

Loss on sale of securities available-for-sale

    (462)

Gain on calls of securities held-to-maturity

  3   

Loss on loans held for sale

  (145)  

BOLI income

  662  438 

Other fee income

  554  328 

Total non-interest income

 $2,546 $1,661 

Noninterest income includes service charges on deposits and loans, loan swap fee income, income from our membership interest in ACM and other investments, income from our BOLI policies, and other fee income, and continues to supplement our operating results.

Noninterest income for the years ended December 31, 20192022 and 20182021 was $2.5$2.8 million and $1.7$4.3 million,


Table respectively, a decrease of Contents

respectively. $1.5 million, which was primarily driven by the loss recorded from our membership interest in ACM of $659 thousand for the year ended December 31, 2022, compared to income from ACM of $1.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2021.

During the last several months of 2022, ACM made strategic investments through hiring top tier mortgage originators and additional support infrastructure, including new branches, to position itself for the current and future mortgage environment. This investment, which has significantly increased ACM's overhead expenses ahead of future earnings, coupled with historically low origination volumes and tighter margins, have caused short-term losses that were not previously forecasted or budgeted. However, ACM has significant cash reserves to draw from and it is expected that these strategic investments will buoy ACM as a top mortgage originator in our region within the next several years. We continue to benefit from synergies created by our ACM investment, including warehouse line activity, loan purchases and customer referrals.
Fee income from fees on loans (which includes loan swap fees), service charges on deposits and other fee income was $2.0$1.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2019, an increase of 20.2%,2022 as compared $1.7 million for the same period of 2018, primarily2021. The decrease in other fee income is a result of an increasedecreases in customer relationships over the past year. Loanboth insurance commission income of $88 thousand and rental income on OREO of $120 thousand, during 2022 when compared to 2021. There were no loan swap fees for the years ended December 31, 20192022 and 2018 were $449 thousand and $660 thousand, respectively. December 31, 2021. Income from BOLI increased 51.1%21% to $662$1.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2022 as compared to $994 thousand for the year ended December 31, 20192021 as compared towe purchased $15 million in BOLI during the year ended December 31, 2018, primarily as a resultsecond quarter of purchases2022.
50

Noninterest Expense

The following table reflects the components of non-interest expense for the years ended December 31, 20192022 and 2018.


2021.

Non-Interest Expense
Years Ended December 31, 2019, 20182022 and 2017
2021
(Dollars in thousands)

Change from Prior Year
20222021AmountPercent
Salaries and employee benefits$20,316 $18,980 $1,336 7.0 %
Occupancy and equipment expense3,252 3,290 (38)(1.2)%
Data processing and network administration2,303 2,203 100 4.5 %
State franchise taxes2,036 1,983 53 2.7 %
Audit, legal and consulting fees1,210 1,489 (279)(18.7)%
Merger and acquisition expense125 1,445 (1,320)(91.3)%
Loan related expenses555 1,247 (692)(55.5)%
FDIC insurance620 770 (150)(19.5)%
Marketing, business development and advertising483 220 263 119.5 %
Director fees668 651 17 2.6 %
Postage, courier and telephone181 190 (9)(4.7)%
Internet banking645 542 103 19.0 %
Dues, memberships & publications194 174 20 11.5 %
Bank insurance453 411 42 10.2 %
Printing and supplies147 104 43 41.3 %
Bank charges90 118 (28)(23.7)%
State assessments161 167 (6)(3.6)%
Core deposit intangible amortization262 305 (43)(14.1)%
Gain on sale of other real estate owned— (236)236 (100.0)%
Tax credit amortization126 — 126 100.0 %
Other operating expenses633 487 146 30.0 %
Total non‑interest expense$34,460 $34,540 $(80)(0.2)%
 
 2019 2018 

Salaries and employee benefits

 $17,047 $14,008 

Occupancy and equipment expense

  3,400  2,524 

Data processing and network administration

  1,638  1,233 

State franchise taxes

  1,696  1,184 

Audit, legal and consulting fees

  826  649 

Merger and acquisition expense

  133  3,339 

Loan related expenses

  476  364 

FDIC insurance

  244  469 

Marketing, business development and advertising

  396  339 

Director fees

  532  457 

Postage, courier and telephone

  195  212 

Internet banking

  439  308 

Dues, memberships & publications

  165  166 

Bank insurance

  356  197 

Printing and supplies

  145  153 

Bank charges

  143  141 

State assessments

  164  119 

Core deposit intangible amortization

  385  118 

Other operating expenses

  497  468 

Total non-interest expense

 $28,877 $26,448 

Noninterest expense includes, among other things, salaries and benefits, occupancy and equipment costs, professional fees, data processing, insurance and miscellaneous expenses. Noninterest expense was $28.9$34.5 million for each of the years ended December 31, 2022 and $26.4December 31, 2021.

Salaries and benefits expense increased $1.3 million to $20.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2022 compared to $19.0 million for the same period in 2021, which was primarily related to business development staff expansion in addition to market rate adjustments to employee compensation during 2022. Merger-related expenses associated with our proposed merger with Blue Ridge totaled $125 thousand and $1.4 million for the years ended December 31, 20192022 and 2018,December 31, 2021, respectively.

        Salaries Audit, legal and benefits expense increased $3.0 millionconsulting fees decreased $279 thousand to $17.0$1.2 million for the year ended December 31, 20192022 as compared to $14.0 millionthe same period of 2021, primarily as a result of expenses incurred in 2021 for 2018. The increaseour membership interest purchase of ACM in salaries and benefits expense is primarily2021. Loan related expenses decreased $692 thousand to increases in our business development and back office personnel to support our growth plans and staffing we retained from our acquisition of Colombo. Other increases in noninterest


Table of Contents

expense were primarily related to supporting the larger organization following the Colombo acquisition and continued organic bank growth. Merger and acquisition expense decreased $3.2 million to $133$555 thousand for the year ended December 31, 20192022 compared to $3.3 millionthe prior year, as loan workout expense decreased during 2022.

During 2021, we sold our OREO property which resulted in 2018. During the third and fourth quartersa gain of 2019, as a result$236 thousand. No such gain or loss was recorded during 2022.
51

Income Taxes

We recorded a provision for income tax expense of $4.2$6.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2019,2022, a decrease of $276 thousand compared to $2.2$6.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2018.2021. Our effective tax rate for December 31, 20192022 was 20.9%19.4%, compared to 17.1%22.2% for 2018.2021. Our effective tax raterates for 20192022 and 2018 is2021 are less than theour combined federal and state statutory rate of 21%22.5% because of discrete tax benefits recorded as a result of nonqualified option exercises of nonqualified stock options during 2019 and 2018.

Discussionthe aforementioned periods.

Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition

Overview

At December 31, 2019,2022, total assets were $1.54$2.34 billion, an increase of 13.7%6%, or $185.7$141.4 million, from $1.35$2.20 billion at December 31, 2018.2021. Total loans receivable, net of deferred fees and costs, increased 11.8%22%, or $133.8$336.6 million, to $1.27$1.84 billion at December 31, 2019,2022, from $1.14$1.50 billion at December 31, 2018.2021. Total investment securities increaseddecreased by $16.3$79.7 million, or 13.0%22%, to $141.6$278.3 million at December 31, 2019,2022, from $125.3$358.0 million at December 31, 2018.2021. Total deposits increased 10.6%decreased 3%, or $123.3$53.6 million, to $1.29$1.83 billion at December 31, 2019,2022, from $1.16$1.88 billion at December 31, 2018.2021. From time to time, we may utilize other borrowed funds such as federal funds purchased and FHLB advances as an additional funding source for the Bank. The BankFor December 31, 2022 and 2021, we had $30.0 million and $0 federal funds purchased, andrespectively. The Bank had FHLB advances outstanding of $10.0$235.0 million and $15.0$25.0 million respectively,for the years ended December 31, 2022 and 2021. Subordinated debt, net of unamortized issuance costs, totaled $19.6 million and $19.5 million at December 31, 2019. At December 31, 2018,2022 and 2021, respectively.
We review our balance sheet and interest rate sensitivity on an ongoing basis as part of our asset/liability risk management process. During February 2023, with the expectation that short-term interest rates would continue to increase during 2023, we had no federalmodeled various scenarios to improve balance sheet efficiency, reduce our cost of funds, purchased orimprove margin and our capital ratios. As a result, we executed a de-lever strategy through the sale of a portion of U.S. government agency low-yielding mortgage-backed investment securities available-for-sale at a one-time loss. The proceeds of this strategy were used to paydown high cost short-term FHLB advances outstanding.

and assist in the funding of higher yielding newly originated commercial loans. During late February, we sold $40.3 million in investment securities available-for-sale, or 12% of the portfolio, for an after-tax loss of $3.6 million, which will be recorded in our March 31, 2023 quarterly results. This transaction was neutral to shareholders’ equity and tangible book value, as the loss recorded was already reflected in our accumulated other comprehensive loss. Tangible common equity to total assets is expected to improve approximately 7 basis points as a result of the reduction in total assets. From an earnings perspective, the balance sheet re-positioning is expected to be accretive to net interest income, net interest margin and return on average assets in future periods. Our model results indicate that net interest margin is expected to improve 9 basis points as a result of this de-leverage strategy.

Additionally, during the first quarter, we fixed $150 million of our wholesale funding through the execution of pay-fixed/receive-floating interest rate swaps. The interest rate swaps have a weighted average rate of 3.50%, have a maturity of five years, and are designated against a mix of FHLB advances and brokered certificates of deposits. Classified as cash flow hedges, the market value fluctuations will not impact future earnings, but will impact accumulated other comprehensive income.
Loans Receivable, Net

Total loans receivable, net of deferred fees and costs, were $1.27$1.84 billion at December 31, 2019,2022, an increase of $133.8$336.6 million, or 11.8%22%, compared to $1.14$1.50 billion at December 31, 2018. The increase in the2021. Excluding PPP loans, receivable portfolio was a result of organic loan growth primarily in our commercial real estate and commercial construction portfolios. At December 31, 2019, we had loans held for sale totaling $11.2which decreased $26.2 million compared to none for 2018. During 2019, we reclassified our unsecured consumer loan portfolio that we had purchased over the last two years. The earnings stream from this segment of our loan portfolio was not as expected as a result of loan forgiveness, net charge-offs totaling $647loan growth was $362.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2022. Loans outstanding under our warehouse facility with ACM totaled $42.7 million at December 31, 2022, a decrease of $29.3 million, or 41%, from $72 million at December 31, 2021, which is consistent with the slowdown of residential mortgage loan demand in our market.
PPP loans, net of deferred fees and costs, totaled $2.0 million at December 31, 2022, a decrease from $28.1 million at December 31, 2021. Net deferred fees associated with PPP loans totaled $37 thousand recorded during 2019. These loans are carried at estimated fair value.

December 31, 2022.

Commercial real estate loans totaled $821.7$1.10 billion at December 31, 2021, or 60% of total loan receivable, compared to $906.1 million at December 31, 2019, compared to $683.6 million at December 31, 2018,2021, an increase of $138.1$194.1 million, or 20.2%21%. Owner-occupied commercial real estate loans were $205.9$206.8 million at December 31, 20192022 compared to $160.6$191.8 million at December 31, 2018.2021. Nonowner-occupied
52

commercial real estate loans were $547.8$893.2 million at December 31, 20192022 compared to $452.2$714.3 million at December 31, 2018. Construction2021. Commercial construction loans totaled $216.0$147.9 million at December 31, 2019,2022, or 17.0%8% of total loans receivable. Of the $216.0$147.9 million in construction loans, $51.8$43.8 million are collateralized by land, and only $510 thousand are lot acquisition and development loans (which have a higher degree of credit risk than the remaining portion of the construction portfolio). totaled $6.4 million at December 31, 2022. Our commercial real estate portfolio, including construction loans, is diversified by asset type and geographic concentration. We plan to manage this portion of our portfolio in a disciplined manner. We have comprehensive policies to monitor, measure, and mitigate our loan


Table of Contents

concentrations within this portfolio segment, including rigorous credit approval, monitoring and administrative practices.

        The following table presents the composition of our

Commercial and industrial loans, receivable portfolioexcluding PPP loans, increased $69.2 million to $243.2 million at each of the five years ended December 31, 2019.


Loans Receivable
At2022, from $174.1 million at December 31, 2019, 2018, 2017, 20162021. Consumer residential loans increased $139.0 million to $339.6 million at December 31, 2022, from $200.6 million at December 31, 2021. The increase in residential loans was primarily a result of purchasing ACM originated mortgages, which were portfolio product offered by the Bank and 2015
(Dollars in thousands)

which met our underwriting criteria.
 
 2019 2018 2017 

Commercial real estate

 $821,692  64.55%$683,602  60.07%$526,657  59.21%

Commercial and industrial

  115,103  9.04% 137,328  12.07% 98,150  11.04%

Commercial construction

  215,983  16.97% 153,339  13.47% 123,444  13.88%

Consumer residential

  108,795  8.55% 131,431  11.55% 108,926  12.25%

Consumer nonresidential

  11,290  0.89% 32,308  2.84% 32,232  3.62%

Consumer construction

    %   %   %

Gross loans

  1,272,863  100.00% 1,138,008  100.00% 889,409  100.00%

Less:

  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
 

Allowance for loan losses

  10,231     9,159     7,725    

Unearned income and (unamortized premiums)

  2,337     1,265     732    

Loans receivable, net

 $1,260,295    $1,127,584    $880,952    


 
 2016 2015 

Commercial real estate

 $476,851  62.08%$376,426  60.40%

Commercial and industrial

  112,061  14.59% 89,502  14.36%

Commercial construction

  53,167  6.92% 49,834  8.00%

Consumer residential

  106,549  13.87% 84,464  13.55%

Consumer nonresidential

  19,548  2.54% 19,127  3.07%

Consumer construction

    % 3,856  0.62%

Gross loans

  768,176  100.00% 623,209  100.00%

Less:

  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
 

Allowance for loan losses

  6,452     6,239    

Unearned income and (unamortized premiums)

  75     (350)   

Loans receivable, net

 $761,649    $617,320    

The following table sets forth the repricing characteristics and sensitivity to interest rate changes of our loan portfolio at December 31, 2019.

2022.

Table of Contents


Loan Maturities and Interest Rate Sensitivity

At December 31, 2019
2022
(Dollars in thousands)

 
 One Year
or Less
 Between One
and Five Years
 After
Five Years
 Total 

Commercial real estate

 $50,626 $308,892 $462,174 $821,692 

Commercial and industrial

  59,062  47,313  8,728  115,103 

Commercial construction

  51,612  91,873  72,498  215,983 

Consumer residential

  4,748  25,455  78,592  108,795 

Consumer nonresidential

  4,478  3,699  3,113  11,290 

Total loans receivable

 $170,526 $477,232 $625,105 $1,272,863 

Fixed—rate loans

 $44,384 $298,369 $287,323 $630,076 

Floating—rate loans

  126,142  178,863  337,782  642,787 

 $170,526 $477,232 $625,105 $1,272,863 

One Year
or Less
Between One
and Five Years
Between Five and Fifteen YearsAfter Fifteen YearsTotal
Commercial real estate$55,428$522,217$519,116$3,500$1,100,261
Commercial and industrial41,670120,78326,81553,964243,232
Paycheck protection program1,9881,988
Commercial construction68,00364,61515,321147,939
Consumer residential25,92056,53671,659185,476339,591
Consumer nonresidential3,5812,1628581,0847,685
Total loans receivable$194,602$768,301$633,769$244,024$1,840,696
Fixed—rate loans$99,530$517,069$379,594$150,321$1,146,514
Floating—rate loans95,072251,232254,17593,703694,182
Total loans receivable$194,602$768,301$633,769$244,024$1,840,696
________________________
*
Payments due by period are based on the repricing characteristics and not contractual maturities.

Asset Quality

Nonperforming assets, defined as nonaccrual loans, loans contractually past due 90 days or more as to principal or interest and still accruing, and OREO at December 31, 20192022 were $14.6$4.5 million compared to $7.4$3.5 million at December 31, 2018.2021. Our ratio of nonperforming assets to total assets was 0.95%0.19% at December 31, 20192022 compared to 0.57%0.16% at December 31, 2018. Troubled debt restructurings, or2021. TDRs, as of December 31, 20192022 and 20182021, totaled $3.9$830 thousand and $92 thousand, respectively.
Nonperforming loans, which are primarily commercial real estate and commercial and industrial loans, increased $1.0 million during 2022 as compared to 2021. Loans that we have classified as nonperforming are a result of customer specific deterioration, mostly financial in nature, and $203not a result of economic, industry, or environmental causes that we might see as a pattern for possible future losses within our loan portfolio. For each of our criticized assets, we conduct an impairment analysis to determine the level of additional or specific reserves required for any portion of the loan that may result in a loss. As a result of the analysis completed, we had specific reserves totaling $86 thousand respectively. The TDR recorded during 2019 is included in our total of nonaccrual loans and nonperforming assets as of$186 thousand at December 31, 2019. However, this TDR did pay off in full, including past due interest2022 and late fees, during the first quarter2021, respectively. Because these loans are individually evaluated for impairment, no general reserve was assessed for valuation purposes.
53

We categorize loans into risk categories based on relevant information about the ability of borrowers to service their debt such as current financial information, historical payment experience, collateral adequacy, credit documentation, and current economic trends, among other factors. We analyze loans individually by classifying the loans as to credit risk. This analysis includes, larger non-homogeneous loans such as commercial real estate and commercial and industrial loans. This analysis is performed on an ongoing basis as new information is obtained. At December 31, 2019,2022, we had $17.0$10.4 million in loans identified as special mention within the originated loan portfolio, an increase of $8.4from $3.0 million fromas of December 31, 2018.2021. Special mention rated loans are loans that have a potential weakness that deserves management's close attention; however, the borrower continues to pay in accordance with their contract. The increase from December 31, 2018 is concentrated in two loans that were added to this risk category during the second quarter of 2019. These loans do not have a specific reserve and are considered well-secured. These two loans, totaling $11.1 million at December 31, 2019, have paid off in full including interest during the first quarter of 2020.
At December 31, 2019,2022, we had $9.8$4.1 million in loans identified as substandard within the originated loan portfolio, an increasea decrease from $19.0 million as of $8.6 million from December 31, 2018.2021 due to a combination of loan payoffs and risk rating improvements during the current year. Substandard rated loans are loans that are inadequately protected by the current net worth and paying capacity of the obligor or of the collateral pledged, if any. For each of these substandard loans, a liquidation analysis is completed. At December 31, 2019,2022, specific reserves on originated and acquired loans totaling $393$86 thousand, hashave been allocated within the allowance for loan losses to supplement any shortfall of collateral. In addition, the above mentioned TDR was classified as substandard, and paid off in full, including past due interest and late fees, during the first quarter of 2020.


Table of Contents

We recorded annualized net charge-offs of 0.05%0.03% and 0.04% for each of the years ended December 31, 20192022 and 2018.2021, respectively. The following tables provide additional information on our asset quality for the periods presented.


Nonperforming Assets
At December 31, 2019, 2018, 2017, 20162022 and 2015
2021
(Dollars in thousands)

20222021
Nonperforming assets: 
Nonaccrual loans$3,150 $3,485 
Loans contractually past‑due 90 days or more1,343 23 
Total nonperforming loans (NPLs)$4,493 $3,508 
Other real estate owned (OREO)— — 
Total nonperforming assets (NPAs)$4,493 $3,508 
Performing troubled debt restructurings (TDRs)$830 $92 
NPLs/Total Assets0.19 %0.16 %
NPAs/Total Assets0.19 %0.16 %
NPAs and TDRs/Total Assets0.23 %0.16 %
Allowance for loan losses/NPLs357.00 %394.21 %
 
 2019 2018 2017 2016 2015 

Nonperforming assets:

                

Nonaccrual loans

 $9,693 $2,180 $741 $94 $2,559 

Loans contractually past-due 90 days or more

  
1,032
  
1,031
  
48
  
155
  
 

Total nonperforming loans (NPLs)

 $10,725 $3,211 $789 $249 $2,559 

Other real estate owned (OREO)

  3,866  4,224  3,866     

Total nonperforming assets (NPAs)

 $14,591 $7,435 $4,655 $249 $2,559 

Performing troubled debt restructurings (TDRs)

 $ $203 $1,671 $11,523 $5,074 

NPLs/Total Assets

  0.70% 0.24% 0.07% 0.03% 0.35%

NPAs/Total Assets

  0.95% 0.57% 0.44% 0.03% 0.35%

NPAs and TDRs/Total Assets

  0.95% 0.57% 0.60% 1.29% 1.04%

Allowance for loan losses/NPLs

  95.39% 285.24% 979.09% 2591.16% 243.81%


Nonperforming Loans by Type
At December 31, 2019, 2018, 2017, 20162022 and 2015
(Dollars in thousands)

 
 2019 2018 2017 2016 2015 

Commercial real estate

 $4,912 $56 $154 $155 $1,145 

Commercial and industrial

  4,142  2,800  48  94  1,304 

Commercial construction

  820         

Consumer residential

  839  355  587    110 

Consumer nonresidential

  12         

 $10,725 $3,211 $789 $249 $2,559 

        At December 31, 2019,2021, there were no performing loans considered a potential problem loan. Potential problem loans are defined as loans that are not included in the 90 day past due, nonaccrual or adversely classified or restructured categories, but for which known information about possible credit problems causes management to be uncertain as to the ability of the borrowers to comply with the present loan repayment terms which may in the future result in disclosure in the past due, nonaccrual or restructured loan categories. At December 31, 2018, there was one performing loan totaling $123 thousand considered a potential problem loan. We take a conservative approach with respect to risk rating loans in our portfolio. Based upon the status as a potential problem loan, these loans receive heightened scrutiny and ongoing intensive risk management. Additionally, our loan loss allowance methodology incorporates increased reserve factors for certain loans considered potential problem loansthat are adversely rated but not impaired as compared to the general portfolio.

        At

We have evaluated our exposure to credit risks directly related to the COVID-19 pandemic. During 2020, as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic, we implemented loan payment deferral programs to allow customers who were required to close or reduce business operations to defer loan principal and interest payments primarily for 90 days. During the first and second quarters of 2020, we modified 277 loans for a total outstanding principal balance of $360.2 million, or 24% of the total loan portfolio. As of December 31, 2019, we had one OREO property with a fair value of $3.9 million. We are in2022, there were no remaining loans on payment deferral related to the process of selling this property and do not expect a material gain or loss from the current fair value of the property as we recorded a $1.1 million gain on the foreclosure of the property during the year ended December 31, 2017.

pandemic.

54


Table of Contents

At December 31, 2022 and December 31, 2021, we had no OREO.
While our loan growth has continued to be strong, unexpected changes in economic growth could adversely affect our loan portfolio, including causing increases in delinquencies and default rates, which would adversely impact our charge-offs and provision for loan losses. Deterioration in real estate values, employment data and household incomes may also result in higher creditloan losses for us. Also, in the ordinary course of business, we may also be subject to a concentration of credit risk to a particular industry, counterparty, borrower or issuer. At December 31, 2019,2022, our commercial real estate portfolio, net of fees (including construction lending) portfolio was 81.5%68% of our total loan portfolio. A deterioration in the financial condition or prospects of a particular industry or a failure or downgrade of, or default by, any particular entity or group of entities could negatively impact our business, perhaps materially, and the systems by which we set limits and monitor the level of our credit exposure to individual entities and industries, may not function as we have anticipated.

See "Critical Accounting Policies" above for more information on our allowance for loan losses methodology.

The following tables present additional information pertaining to the activity in and allocation of the allowance for loan losses by loan type and the percentage of the loan type to the total loan portfolio. The allocation of the allowance for loan losses to a category of loans is not necessarily indicative of future losses or charge-offs, and does not restrict the use of the allowance to any specific category of loans.


Allowance for Loan Losses
Years Ended December 31, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016,2022 and 2015
2021
(Dollars in thousands)

20222021
Net (charge-offs) recoveriesPercentage of net charge-offs (annualized) to average loans outstanding during the yearNet (charge-offs) recoveriesPercentage of net charge-offs (annualized) to average loans outstanding during the year
Commercial real estate$— — %$(453)(0.03)%
Commercial and industrial(396)(0.02)%(117)(0.01)%
Consumer residential— %35 — %
Consumer nonresidential(23)— %(94)(0.01)%
Total$(418)(0.03)%$(629)(0.04)%
Average loans outstanding during the period$1,618,077 $1,463,829 
Allowance for loan losses to loans receivable, net of fees0.87 %0.92 %
Allowance for loan losses to loans receivable, net of fees, excluding PPP0.87 %0.94 %

55
 
 2019 2018 2017 2016 2015 

Beginning balance

 $9,159 $7,725 $6,452 $6,239 $5,565 

Provision for loan losses

  1,720  1,920  1,200  1,471  1,073 

Loans charged off:

                

Commercial real estate

  (20)     (513) (98)

Commercial and industrial

    (86) (44) (669) (312)

Consumer residential

    (187)   (76)  

Consumer nonresidential

  (692) (292) (33)    

Total loans charged off

  (712) (565) (77) (1,258) (410)

Recoveries:

                

Commercial real estate

  4        11 

Commercial and industrial

  35  26  117     

Consumer residential

  2  1       

Consumer nonresidential

  23  52  33     

Total recoveries

  64  79  150    11 

Net (charge-offs) recoveries

  (648) (486) 73  (1,258) (399)

Ending balance

 $10,231 $9,159 $7,725 $6,452 $6,239 



 
 2019 2018 2017 2016 2015 

Loans, net of deferred fees:

                

Balance at period end

 $1,270,526 $1,136,743 $888,677 $768,102 $623,559 

Allowance for loan losses to loans receivable, net of fees

  0.81% 0.81% 0.87% 0.84% 1.00%

Net charge-offs (recoveries) to average loans receivable

  0.05% 0.05% (0.01)% 0.19% 0.07%

Table of Contents


Allocation of the Allowance for Loan Losses
At December 31, 2019, 2018, 2017, 20162022 and 2015
2021
(Dollars in thousands)

20222021
Allocation
% of Total*
Allocation
% of Total*
Commercial real estate$10,777 59.77 %$8,995 60.11 %
Commercial and industrial2,623 13.21 %1,827 11.55 %
Paycheck protection program— 0.11 %— 1.90 %
Commercial construction1,499 8.04 %2,009 12.45 %
Consumer residential1,044 18.45 %781 13.31 %
Consumer nonresidential97 0.42 %217 0.68 %
Total allowance for loan losses$16,040 100.00 %$13,829 100.00 %
 
 2019 2018 2017 
 
 Allocation % of Total* Allocation % of Total* Allocation % of Total* 

Commercial real estate

 $6,399  64.55%$5,548  60.07%$4,832  59.21%

Commercial and industrial

  1,275  9.04% 1,474  12.07% 768  11.04%

Commercial construction

  2,067  16.97% 1,285  13.47% 1,191  13.88%

Consumer residential

  417  8.55% 518  11.55% 626  12.25%

Consumer nonresidential

  73  0.89% 334  2.84% 268  3.62%

Consumer construction

    0.00%   0.00%   0.00%

Unallocated

    0.00%   0.00% 40  0.00%

Total allowance for loan losses

 $10,231  100.00%$9,159  100.00%$7,725  100.00%



 
 2016 2015 
 
 Allocation % of Total* Allocation % of Total* 

Commercial real estate

 $4,266  62.08%$4,002  60.40%

Commercial and industrial

  1,032  14.59% 1,442  14.36%

Commercial construction

  375  6.92% 302  8.00%

Consumer residential

  500  13.87% 282  13.55%

Consumer nonresidential

  121  2.54% 98  3.07%

Consumer construction

    0.00% 23  0.62%

Unallocated

  158  0.00% 89  0.00%

Total allowance for loan losses

 $6,452  100.00%$6,238  100.00%

___________________
*
Percentage of loan type to the total loan portfolio.

Investment Securities

Our investment securities portfolio is used as a source of income and liquidity. The investment portfolio consists of investment securities available-for-sale and investment securities held-to-maturity and certificates of deposit.held-to-maturity. Investment securities available-for-sale are those securities that we intend to hold for an indefinite period of time, but not necessarily until maturity. These securities are carried at fair value and may be sold as part of an asset/liability strategy, liquidity management or regulatory capital management. Investment securities held-to-maturity were $264 thousand at each of December 31, 2019 compared to $1.8 million at December 31, 2018,2022 and 2021, and are those securities that we have the intent and ability to hold to maturity and are carried at amortized cost. The fair value of ourOur investment securities available-for-saleportfolio was $141.3$278.3 million at December 31, 2019, an increase of $17.8 million or 14.4%, from $123.52022 compared to $358.0 million at December 31, 2018. We purchased $36.62021. Investment securities decreased $79.7 million during the year ended December 31, 2022, primarily as a result of principal paydowns of $37.1 million and a $49.0 million decrease in the market value of the available-for-sale investment securitiesportfolio during 20192022. The decrease in market value is due to help enhancethe current increasing rate environment and not a result of any credit deterioration of the portfolio. These purchases were primarily funded through our increase in deposits and PPP loan forgiveness to deploy excess liquidity and optimize net interest margin by investing in higher yielding earning assets including the reinvestment of $21.1 million in cash flows provided by mortgage-backed security redemptions.

margin.

As of December 31, 20192022 and 2018,2021, the majority of the investment securities portfolio consisted of securities rated AAA by a leading rating agency. Investment securities whichthat carry a AAA rating are judged to be of the best quality and carry the smallest degree of investment risk. All of our mortgage-backed securities are guaranteed by either the Federal National Mortgage Association, the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation, or the Government National Mortgage Association. Investment


Table of Contents

securities that were pledged to secure public deposits totaled $11.3$108.7 million and $8.1$85.6 million at December 31, 20192022 and December 31, 2018,2021, respectively.

We complete reviews for other-than-temporary impairment at least quarterly. At December 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018, only investment grade securities were in an unrealized loss position. Investment securities with unrealized losses are a result of pricing changes due to recent and negativerising rate conditions in the current market environment and not as a result of permanent credit impairment. Contractual cash flows for the agency mortgage-backed securities are guaranteed and/or funded by the U.S. government. Municipal securities have third party protective elements and there are no negative indications that the contractual cash flows will not be received when due. We do not intend to sell nor do we believe we will be required to sell any of our temporarily impaired securities prior to the recovery of the amortized cost.

No other-than-temporary impairment has been recognized for the securities in our investment portfolio as of December 31, 2019,2022 and December 31, 2018.

2021.

We hold restricted investments in equities of the Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond, or FRB and FHLB. At December 31, 2019,2022, we owned $1.9$11.1 million in FHLB stock and $4.0$4.4 million in FRB stock. At December 31, 2018,2021, we owned $1.1$1.8 million in FHLB stock and $4.0$4.4 million in FRB stock.

        The following table reflects the composition of our investment portfolio, at amortized cost, at December 31, 2019, 2018, and 2017.


Investment Securities
At December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017
(Dollars in thousands)

56

 
 2019 2018 2017 
 
 Balance Percent of
Total
 Balance Percent of
Total
 Balance Percent of
Total
 

Held-to-maturity

                   

Securities of state and local municipalities tax exempt

 $264  0.19%$264  0.21%$263  0.22%

Securities of U.S. government and federal agencies

    0.00% 1,497  1.16% 1,497  1.25%

Total held-to-maturity securities

 $264  0.19%$1,761  1.37%$1,760  1.47%

Available-for-sale

  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
 

Securities of U.S. government and federal agencies

 $4,000  2.84%$1,000  0.78%$1,000  0.83%

Securities of state and local municipalities

  4,631  3.29% 6,056  4.72% 6,285  5.24%

Corporate bonds and securities

  6,984  4.97% 5,000  3.89% 5,000  4.17%

Mortgage-backed securities

  124,757  88.71% 114,379  89.05% 105,321  87.88%

Certificates of deposit

    0.00% 245  0.19% 490  0.41%

Total available-for-sale securities

 $140,372  99.81%$126,680  98.63%$118,096  98.53%

Total investment securities

 $140,636  100.00%$128,441  100.00%$119,856  100.00%

Table of Contents

The following table presents the amortized costweighted average yields of our investment portfolio by their stated maturities, as well as the weighted average yields for each of the maturity ranges at December 31, 2019.


2022 and 2021.

Investment Securities by Stated Maturity
At December 31, 2019
2022 and 2021
(Dollars in thousands)


 
 2019 
 
 Within One Year One to Five Years Five to Ten Years Over Ten Years Total 
 
 Amortized
Cost
 Weighted
Average
Yield
 Amortized
Cost
 Weighted
Average
Yield
 Amortized
Cost
 Weighted
Average
Yield
 Amortized
Cost
 Weighted
Average
Yield
 Amortized
Cost
 Weighted
Average
Yield
 

Held-to-maturity

                               

Securities of state and local municipalities tax exempt

 $   $   $264  2.32%$   $264  2.32%

Total held-to-maturity securities

 $   $   $264  2.32%$   $264  2.32%

Available-for-sale

                               

Securities of U.S. government and federal agencies

 $   $1,000  2.12%$3,000  2.32%$   $4,000  2.27%

Securities of state and local municipalities

      1,028  2.25% 1,380  2.30% 2,223  2.81% 4,631  2.54%

Corporate bonds

          6,984  4.83%     6,984  4.83%

Mortgaged-backed securities

          14,163  2.26% 110,594  2.51% 124,757  2.48%

Total available-for-sale securities

 $   $2,028  2.19%$25,527  2.97%$112,817  2.52%$140,372  2.59%

Total investment securities

 $   $2,028  2.19%$25,791  2.97%$112,817  2.52%$140,636  2.59%
2022
Within One YearOne to Five YearsFive to Ten YearsOver Ten YearsTotal
Weighted
Average
Yield
Weighted
Average
Yield
Weighted
Average
Yield
Weighted
Average
Yield
Weighted
Average
Yield
Held‑to‑maturity
Securities of state and local municipalities tax exempt— 2.32 %— — 2.32 %
Total held‑to‑maturity securities— 2.32 %— — 2.32 %
Available‑for‑sale
Securities of U.S. government and federal agencies— — 1.49 %— 1.49 %
Securities of state and local municipalities— 2.25 %— 2.92 %2.43 %
Corporate bonds— 6.02 %4.09 %— 4.27 %
Mortgaged‑backed securities— 2.09 %2.48 %1.57 %1.62 %
Total available‑for‑sale securities— 3.73 %2.84 %1.57 %1.79 %
Total investment securities— 3.65 %2.51 %1.57 %1.79 %

2021
Within One YearOne to Five YearsFive to Ten YearsOver Ten YearsTotal
Weighted
Average
Yield
Weighted
Average
Yield
Weighted
Average
Yield
Weighted
Average
Yield
Weighted
Average
Yield
Held‑to‑maturity
Securities of state and local municipalities tax exempt— — 2.32 %— 2.32 %
Total held‑to‑maturity securities— — 2.32 %— 2.32 %
Available‑for‑sale
Securities of U.S. government and federal agencies— — 1.49 %— 1.49 %
Securities of state and local municipalities— 2.25 %— 2.92 %2.45 %
Corporate bonds— 3.98 %4.15 %— 4.12 %
Mortgaged‑backed securities— — 2.21 %1.53 %1.57 %
Total available‑for‑sale securities— 3.27 %2.51 %1.53 %1.68 %
Total investment securities— 3.27 %2.51 %1.53 %1.68 %
Deposits and Other Borrowed Funds

The following table sets forth the average balances of deposits and the percentage of each category to total average deposits for the years ended December 31, 2022 and 2021:
Average Balance
(Dollars in thousands)20222021
Noninterest-bearing demand$501,962 27.77 %$527,675 31.29 %
Interest-bearing deposits
Interest checking724,881 40.10 %587,151 34.82 %
Savings and money markets315,653 17.46 %303,317 17.99 %
Certificate of deposits, $100,000 to $249,99951,490 2.85 %58,453 3.47 %
Certificate of deposits, $250,000 or more152,229 8.42 %172,215 10.21 %
Other time deposits61,478 3.39 %37,657 2.22 %
Total$1,807,693 100.00 %$1,686,468 100.00 %
57

Table of Contents

Total deposits were $1.29$1.83 billion at December 31, 2019, an increase2022, a decrease of $123.3$53.6 million, or 10.6%3%, from $1.16$1.88 billion at December 31, 2018.2021. Noninterest-bearing deposits totaled $306.2$438.3 million at December 31, 2019,2022, comprising 23.8%24% of total deposits and increased $72.9 million, or 31.3%, compared to December 31, 2018. The increase in total deposits during 2019 was primarily due to our core deposit gathering efforts as we strategically decreased our reliance on brokered deposit funding, which is used as a short-term funding source for the Bank. At December 31, 2019, deposits from municipalities, which are secured by a letter of credit issued by the FHLB and a portion of our investment securities, represented 8.4% of our total deposits. Deposits of any individual municipality are generally limited to 5% of total assets and in the aggregate, municipalities are limited to 18% of total assets. Some of these customers utilize our treasury management services, and all maintain deposits of varying types and maturities. As such, we believe that these customers are unlikely to abruptly terminate their relationship with us. However, in the event that we were to lose all or a significant portion of the deposits of one or more of these customers, we believe that we have adequate alternative sources of liquidity to enable us to replace these funds, although the cost of such replacement sources of liquidity could be higher.


Table of Contents

        The following table provides information on our deposit composition at December 31, 2019.


Deposit Composition
At December 31, 2019
(Dollars in thousands)

 
 2019 
 
 Balance Average
Rate
 

Noninterest bearing demand

 $306,235   

Interest bearing—checking, savings and money market

  557,148  1.18%

Time deposits $100,000 or more

  270,508  2.37%

Other time deposits

  151,831  2.19%

 $1,285,722    

        The remaining maturity of time deposits at December 31, 2019 are as follows:

 
 2019 

Three months or less

 $114,991 

Over three months through six months

  94,550 

Over six months through twelve months

  114,281 

Over twelve months

  98,517 

 $422,339 

Wholesale deposits increased to $100.0$248.0 million at December 31, 2019, or $15.6 million,2022 from $84.4$35.0 million at December 31, 2018. In addition, we2021, which offset the year-over-year declines in all other deposit categories, which was a result of customers using their excess liquidity to fund their business activity, and decreases in escrow funds from title and real estate companies due to the slowdown in real estate activity in the market.

We are a member of the Promontory InterfinancialIntraFi Network or Promontory,("IntraFi"), which gives us the ability to offer Certificates of Deposit Account Registry Service or CDARS,("CDARS"), and Insured Cash Sweep or ICS,("ICS"), products to our customers who seek to maximize FDIC insurance protection. When a customer places a large deposit with us for Promontory,IntraFi, funds are placed into certificates of deposit or other deposit products with other banks in the CDARS and ICS networks in increments of less than $250 thousand so that principal and interest are eligible for FDIC insurance protection. These deposits are part of our core deposit base. At December 31, 20192022 and December 31, 2018,2021, we had $71.4$117.6 million and $88.7$186.0 million, respectively, in either CDARS reciprocal or ICS reciprocal products. The decrease from December 31, 2021 is a result of certain customers utilizing excess liquidity for their day-to-day operations.
As of December 31, 2022 and 2021, the estimated amount of total uninsured deposits were $727.3 million and $901.1 million, respectively. The estimate of uninsured deposits generally represents the portion of deposit accounts that exceed the FDIC insurance limit of $250 thousand and is calculated based on the same methodologies and assumptions used for purposes of the Bank's regulatory reporting requirements. The following table reports thosematurities of the estimated amount of uninsured certificates of deposit that exceed $100,000 by maturity for the year endedat December 31, 2019.


2022.

Certificates of Deposit Over $100,000 and Greater
than $250,000
At December 31, 2019
2022
(Dollars in thousands)

2022
Three months or less$38,589
Over three months through six months45,366
Over six months through twelve months51,820
Over twelve months23,747
$159,522
 
 2019 

Three months or less

 $45,309 

Over three months through six months

  59,303 

Over six months through twelve months

  93,456 

Over twelve months

  72,440 

 $270,508 

Other borrowed funds, which include federal funds purchased, FHLB advances, and our subordinated notes, were $49.5$284.6 million at December 31, 2019,2022, and $24.4$44.5 million at December 31, 2018. At2021. For December 31, 2019,2022 and 2021, we had $10.0$235.0 million and $25.0 million, respectively, in FHLB advances. The increase in FHLB advances was a result of the aforementioned decrease in customer deposits and to assist in funding loan origination activity. Subordinated debt, net of unamortized issuance costs, totaled $19.6 million and $19.5 million at December 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively. For December 31, 2022 and 2021, we had $30.0 million and $0 federal funds purchased, and $15.0 million in FHLB advances. We had no federal funds purchased or FHLB advances at December 31, 2018.


respectively.

Table of Contents

        The following table reflects the short-term borrowings and other borrowed funds outstanding at December 31, 2019, 2018, and 2017.


Short-Term Borrowings and Other Borrowed Funds
At December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017
(Dollars in thousands)

 
 2019 2018 2017 
 
 Amount
Outstanding
 Weighted
Average
Rate
 Amount
Outstanding
 Weighted
Average
Rate
 Amount
Outstanding
 Weighted
Average
Rate
 

Other short-term borrowed funds:

                   

Federal funds purchased

 $10,000  1.60%$   $   

FHLB advances—short term

  15,000  1.73%        

Total short-term borrowed funds and weighted average rate

 $25,000  1.68%$   $   

Other borrowed funds:

                   

Subordinated debt

  24,487  6.00% 24,407  6.00% 24,327  6.00%

Total other borrowed funds and weighted average rate

 $24,487  6.00%$24,407  6.00%$24,327  6.00%

Total borrowed funds and weighted average rate

 $49,487  3.82%$24,407  6.00%$24,327  6.00%

Capital Resources

Capital adequacy is an important measure of financial stability and performance. Our objectives are to maintain a level of capitalization that is sufficient to sustain asset growth and promote depositor and investor confidence.

Regulatory agencies measure capital adequacy utilizing a formula that takes into account the individual risk profile of the financial institution. The minimum capital requirements are: (i) a common equity Tier 1, or CET1 capital ratio of 4.5%; (ii) a Tier 1 to risk-based assets capital ratio of 6%; (iii) a total risk based capital ratio of 8%; and (iv) a Tier 1 leverage ratio of 4%. Additionally, a capital conservation buffer requirement of 2.5% of risk-weighted assets is designed to absorb losses during periods of economic stress and is applicable to our CET1 capital, Tier 1 capital and total capital ratios. Including the conservation buffer, we currently consider our minimum capital ratios to be as follows: 7.00% for CET1; 8.50% for Tier 1 capital; and 10.50% for Total capital. Banking institutions with a ratio of common equity Tier 1 to risk-weighted assets above the minimum but below the minimum plus the conservation buffer will face constraints on dividends, equity repurchases, and compensation. The
58

Table of Contents
On January 1, 2020, the federal banking agencies have adopted a CBLR, which is calculated by dividing tangible equity capital by average consolidated total assets of 9%.assets. If a "qualified community bank," generally a depository institution or depository institution holding company with consolidated assets of less than $10 billion, opts into the CBLR framework and has a leverage ratio whichthat exceeds the CBLR threshold, which was initially set at 9%, then such bank will be considered to have met all generally applicable leverage and risk based capital requirements under Basel III, the capital ratio requirements for "well capitalized" status under Section 38 of the FDIA, and any other leverage or capital requirements to which it is subject. A bank or holding company may be excluded from qualifying community bank status base on its risk profile, including consideration of its off-balance sheet exposures; trading assets and liabilities; total notional derivatives exposures and such other facts as the appropriate federal banking agencies determine to be appropriate. AsAt January 1, 2020, we qualified for and adopted this simplified capital structure. Effective September 30, 2022, we opted out of the CBLR framework. A banking organization that opts out of the CBLR framework can subsequently opt back into the CBLR framework if it meets the criteria listed above. We believe that the Bank met all capital adequacy requirements to which it was subject as of December 31, 2019, we qualified for this simplified capital regime, however, there can be no assurance that satisfaction of the CBLR will provide adequate capital for our operations2022 and growth, or an adequate cushion against increase levels of nonperforming assets or weakened economic conditions.

December 31, 2021.

Table of Contents

        Shareholders'Stockholders' equity at December 31, 20192022 was $179.1$202.4 million, an increasea decrease of $20.7$7.4 million, compared to $158.3$209.8 million at December 31, 2018.2021. The increasedecrease in shareholders' equity was primarily attributable to a decrease in accumulated other comprehensive income of $34.5 million, which was primarily related to the recognitiondecrease in the market value of the Company's available-for-sale investment securities portfolio, offset by net income of $15.8 millionrecorded for the year ended December 31, 2019. Common stock issued as a result of option exercises increased shareholders' equity by $1.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2019. Accumulated other comprehensive income increased $3.1 million during 2019, primarily as a result of an increase in market value of our available-for-sale investment securities portfolio.

2022 totaling $25.0 million.

Total shareholders'stockholders' equity to total assets for each of December 31, 20192022 was 8.6% and for December 31, 20182021 was 11.7%9.5%. Tangible book value per share (a non-GAAP financial measure which is defined in the table below) at December 31, 20192022 and December 31, 20182021 was $12.26$11.14 and $10.93,$11.76, respectively. Total risk-based capital to risk-weighted assets for the Bank was 13.43% at December 31, 2019 compared to 14.02% at December 31, 2018. Accordingly, we were considered "well capitalized" for regulatory purposes at December 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018.

As noted above,below, regulatory capital levels for the bank meets those established for "well capitalized" institutions. While we are currently considered "well capitalized," we may from time to time find it necessary to access the capital markets to meet our growth objectives or capitalize on specific business opportunities.

As the Company is a bank holding company with less than $3 billion in assets, and which does not (i) conduct significant off balance sheet activities, (ii) engage in significant non-banking activities, and (iii) have a material amount of securities registered under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the "Exchange Act"), it is not currently subject to risk-based capital requirements adopted by the Federal Reserve, which are substantially identical to those applicablepursuant to the Bank, and which are described below.small bank holding company policy statement. The Company understands that the Federal Reserve has not historically deemed a bank holding company ineligible for application of the small bank holding company policy statement solely because its common stock is registered under the Exchange Act. There can be no assurance that the Federal Reserve will continue this practice.

59

Table of Contents
The following tables shows the minimum capital requirement and our capital position at December 31, 20192022 and December 31, 20182021 for the Bank.


Table of Contents


Capital Components

At December 31, 20192022 and 2018
2021
(Dollars in thousands)

ActualMinimum Capital RequirementMinimum to be Well Capitalized Under Prompt Corrective Action
AmountRatioAmount
Ratio (1)
AmountRatio
At December 31, 2022
Total risk-based capital$256,898 13.28 %$203,113 >10.50 %$193,441 >10.00 %
Tier 1 risk-based capital240,858 12.45 %164,425 >8.50 %154,753 >8.00 %
Common equity tier 1 capital240,858 12.45 %135,409 >7.00 %125,737 >6.50 %
Leverage capital ratio240,858 10.75 %87,894 >4.00 %109,867 >5.00 %
At December 31, 2021
Total risk-based capital$222,871 13.54 %$177,069 >10.50 %$168,638 >10.00 %
Tier 1 risk-based capital214,442 12.72 %143,342 >8.50 %134,910 >8.00 %
Common equity tier 1 capital214,442 12.72 %118,046 >7.00 %109,614 >6.50 %
Leverage capital ratio214,442 10.55 %81,712 >4.00 %102,140 >5.00 %
(1) Ratios include capital conservation buffer.
Reconciliation of Book Value (GAAP) to Tangible Book Value (non-GAAP)
At December 31, 2022 and 2021
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
20222021
Total stockholders' equity (GAAP)$202,382$209,796
Less: goodwill and intangibles, net(7,790)(8,052)
Tangible Common Equity (non-GAAP)$194,592$201,744
 
Book value per common share (GAAP)$11.58$12.23
Less: intangible book value per common share(0.44)(0.47)
Tangible book value per common share (non-GAAP)$11.14$11.76
 
 Actual For Capital Adequacy
Purposes(1)
 To Be Well Capitalized
Under Prompt
Corrective Action
Provisions
 
 
 Amount Ratio Amount  
 Ratio Amount  
 Ratio 

At December 31, 2019

                         

Total risk-based capital

 $192,364  13.43%$150,369  ³  10.500%$143,208  ³  10.00%

Tier I risk-based capital

  182,121  12.72% 121,727  ³  8.500% 114,567  ³  8.00%

Common equity tier I capital

  182,121  12.72% 100,246  ³  7.000% 93,085  ³  6.50%

Leverage capital ratio

  182,121  12.15% 98,214  ³  6.500% 75,550  ³  5.00%

At December 31, 2018

  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
 

Total risk-based capital

 $172,975  14.02%$121,861  ³  9.875%$123,404  ³  10.00%

Tier I risk-based capital

  163,804  13.27% 97,180  ³  7.875% 98,723  ³  8.00%

Common equity tier I capital

  163,804  13.27% 78,670  ³  6.375% 80,213  ³  6.50%

Leverage capital ratio

  163,804  12.41% 52,777  ³  4.000% 65,971  ³  5.00%

Liquidity
(1)
Except with regard to the Bank's Tier 1 to average assets ratio, the minimum capital requirement for capital adequacy purposes includes the phased-in portion of the BASEL III Capital Rules conservation buffer.

Liquidity

Liquidity in the banking industry is defined as the ability to meet the demand for funds of both depositors and borrowers. We must be able to meet these needs by obtaining funding from depositors or other lenders or by converting non-cash items into cash. The objective of our liquidity management program is to ensure that we always have sufficient resources to meet the demands of our depositors and borrowers. Stable core deposits and a strong capital position provide the base for our liquidity position. We believe we have demonstrated our ability to attract deposits because of our convenient branch locations, personal service, technology and pricing.

In addition to deposits, we have access to the different wholesale funding markets. These markets include the brokered certificate of deposit market and the federal funds market. We are a member of the Promontory InterfinancialIntraFi Network, which allows banking customers to access FDIC insurance protection on deposits through our Bank which exceed FDIC insurance limits. We also have one-way authority with PromontoryIntraFi for both their CDARs and ICS products which provides the Bank the ability to access additional wholesale funding as needed. We also maintain secured lines of credit with the FRB and the FHLB for which we can borrow up to the allowable amount for the collateral pledged. Having diverse funding alternatives reduces our reliance on any one source for funding.

60

Table of Contents
Cash flow from amortizing assets or maturing assets also provides funding to meet the needs of depositors and borrowers.

We have established a formal liquidity contingency plan which establishes a liquidity management team and provides guidelines for liquidity management. For our liquidity management program, we first determine our current liquidity position and then forecast liquidity based on anticipated changes in the balance sheet. In this forecast, we expect to maintain a liquidity cushion. We also stress test our liquidity position under several different stress scenarios, from moderate to severe. Guidelines for the forecasted liquidity cushion and for liquidity cushions for each stress scenario have been established. We believe that we have sufficient resources to meet our liquidity needs.


TableOur primary and secondary sources of Contents

liquidity remain strong. Liquid assets, which include cash and due from banks, interest-bearing deposits at other financial institutionsfederal funds sold and investment securities available for sale, totaled $174.5 $359.6 million at December 31, 2019,2022, or 11.4% 15% of total assets. We held investments that are classified as held-to-maturity in the amount of $264 thousandassets, a decrease from $598.7 million, or 27%, at December 31, 2019.2021. To maintain ready access to the Bank's secured lines of credit, the Bank has pledged a portion of its commercial real estate and residential real estate loan portfolios to the FHLB and FRB. Additional borrowing capacity at the FHLB at December 31, 20192022 was approximately $113.3approximately $138.5 million. Borrowing capacity with the FRB was approximately $51.9 approximately $94.2 million at December 31, 2019.2022. These facilities are subject to the FHLB and the Federal ReserveFRB approving disbursement to us. In addition, we have investment securities of $130.0 million which are available to pledge at FHLB to provide additional borrowing capacity if needed. We also have unsecured federal funds purchased lines of $189.0approximately $265.0 million available to us.us of which $30.0 million was advanced as of December 31, 2022. We anticipate maintaining liquidity at a level sufficient to protect depositors as we endure through this pandemic, provide for reasonable growth, and fully comply with all regulatory requirements.

Liquidity is essential to our business. Our liquidity could be impaired by an inability to access the capital markets or by unforeseen outflows of cash, including deposits. This situation may arise due to circumstances that we may be unable to control, such as general market disruption, negative views about the financial services industry generally, or an operational problem that affects a third party or us. Our ability to borrow from other financial institutions on favorable terms or at all could be adversely affected by disruptions in the capital markets or other events. As discussed under the caption "Deposits and Other Borrowed Funds" above, we have a deposit concentration related to municipalities at December 31, 2019. While we believe we have a healthy liquidity position and do not anticipate the loss of deposits of any of the significant deposit customers, any of the factors discussed above could materially impact our liquidity position in the future.

Financial Instruments with Off-Balance-Sheet Risk and Credit Risk

We are a party to financial instruments with off-balance-sheet risk in the normal course of business to meet the financing needs of our customers. These financial instruments include commitments to extend credit and standby letters of credit. Those instruments involve, to varying degrees, elements of credit risk in excess of the amount recognized in the balance sheet.

The Bank's maximum exposure to credit loss in the event of nonperformance by the other party to the financial instrument for commitments to extend credit and standby letters of credit is represented by the contractual amount of those instruments. The Bank uses the same credit policies in making commitments and conditional obligations as it does for on-balance-sheet instruments. We evaluate each customer's credit worthiness on a case-by-case basis and require collateral to support financial instruments when deemed necessary. The amount of collateral obtained upon extension of credit is based on management's evaluation of the counterparty. Collateral held varies but may include deposits held by us, marketable securities, accounts receivable, inventory, property, plant and equipment, and income-producing commercial properties.

Commitments to extend credit are agreements to lend to a customer as long as there is no violation of any condition established in the contract. Commitments generally have fixed expiration dates up to one year or other termination clauses and may require payment of a fee. Since many of the commitments are expected to expire without being drawn upon, the total commitment amounts do not necessarily represent future cash requirements. These instruments represent obligations to extend credit or guarantee borrowings and are not recorded on the consolidated statements of financial condition. The rates and terms of these instruments are competitive with others in the market in which we do business.


Table of Contents

Unfunded commitments under lines of credit are commitments for possible future extensions of credit to existing customers. Those lines of credit may not be drawn upon to the total extent to which we have committed.

Standby letters of credit are conditional commitments we issued to guarantee the performance of a customer to a third party. Those guarantees are primarily issued to support public and private borrowing arrangements, including commercial paper, bond financing, and similar transactions. The credit risk involved in issuing letters of credit is essentially the same as
61

Table of Contents
that involved in extending loan facilities to customers. We hold certificates of deposit, deposit accounts, and real estate as collateral supporting those commitments for which collateral is deemed necessary.

With the exception of these off-balance sheet arrangements, we do not have any off-balance sheet arrangements that have or are reasonably likely to have a current or future effect on our financial condition, results of operations, changes in financial condition, revenue, expenses, capital expenditures, or capital resources, that is material to the business of the Company.

At December 31, 20192022 and December 31, 2018,2021, unused commitments to fund loans and lines of credit totaled $244.4$235.6 million and $216.0$183.1 million, respectively. Commercial and standby letters of credit totaled $9.0$6.5 million and $9.4$8.9 million at December 31, 20192022 and December 31, 2018,2021, respectively.

Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

        As a financial institution, we are exposed to various business risks, including interest rate risk. Interest rate risk is the risk to earnings and value arising from volatility in market interest rates. Interest rate risk arises from timing differences in the repricings and maturities of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities, changes in the expected maturities of assets and liabilities arising from embedded options, such as borrowers' ability to prepay loans and depositors' ability to redeem certificates of deposit before maturity, changes in the shape of the yield curve where interest rates increase or decrease in a nonparallel fashion, and changes in spread relationships between different yield curves, such as U.S. Treasuries and LIBOR. Our goal is to maximize net interest income without incurring excessive interest rate risk. Management of net interest income and interest rate risk must be consistent with the level of capital and liquidity that we maintain. We manage interest rate risk through an asset and liability committee, or ALCO. ALCO is responsible for managing our interest rate risk in conjunction with liquidity and capital management.

        We employ an independent consulting firm to model our interest rate sensitivity. We use a net interest income simulation model as our primary tool to measure interest rate sensitivity. Many assumptions are developed based on expected activity in the balance sheet. For maturing assets, assumptions are created for the redeployment of these assets. For maturing liabilities, assumptions are developed for the replacement of these funding sources. Assumptions are also developed for assets and liabilities that could reprice during the modeled time period. These assumptions also cover how we expect rates to change on non-maturity deposits such as interest checking, money market checking, savings accounts as well as certificates of deposit. Based on inputs that include the current balance sheet, the current level of interest rates and the developed assumptions, the model then produces an expected level of net interest income assuming that market rates remain unchanged. This is considered the base case. Next, the model determines what net interest income would be based on specific changes in interest rates. The rate simulations are performed for a two year period and include ramped rate changes of down 100 basis points to 400 basis points and up 100 basis points to 400 basis points. In both the up and down scenarios, the model assumes a parallel shift in the yield curve. The results of these simulations are then compared to the base case.

        Stress testing the balance sheet and net interest income using instantaneous parallel shock movements in the yield curve of 100 to 400 basis points is a regulatory and banking industry practice. However, these stress tests may not represent a realistic forecast of future interest rate movements in


Not required.

62

Table of Contents

the yield curve. In addition, instantaneous parallel interest rate shock modeling is not a predictor of actual future performance of earnings. It is a financial metric used to manage interest rate risk and track the movement of the Bank's interest rate risk position over a historical time frame for comparison purposes.

        At December 31, 2019, our asset/liability position was slightly asset sensitive based on our interest rate sensitivity model. Our net interest income would increase by 0.1% in an up 100 basis point scenario and would decrease by 0.7% in an up 400 basis point scenario over a one-year time frame. In the two-year time horizon, our net interest income would increase by 2.9% in an up 100 basis point scenario and would increase by 7.2% in an up 400 basis point scenario. At December 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018, all interest rate risk stress tests measures were within our board policy established limits in each of the increased rate scenarios.

        Additional information on our interest rate sensitivity for a static balance sheet over a one-year time horizon as of December 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018 can be found below.

Interest Rate Risk to Earnings (Net Interest Income) 
December 31, 2019 December 31, 2018 
Change in interest
rates (basis points)
 Percentage change in
net interest income
 Change in interest
rates (basis points)
 Percentage change in
net interest income
 
 +400  –0.69% +400  2.74%
 +300  –0.20% +300  2.25%
 +200  0.11% +200  1.77%
 +100  0.11% +100  1.03%
 0    0   
 –100  0.56% –100  –1.13%
 –200  –0.80% –200  –4.80%

        Economic value of equity, or EVE, measures the period end market value of assets less the market value of liabilities and the change in this value as rates change. It models simultaneous parallel shifts in market interest rates, implied by the forward yield curve. The EVE model calculates the market value of capital by taking the present value of all asset cash flows less the present value of all liability cash flows.

        The interest rate risk to capital at December 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018 is shown below and reflects that our market value of capital is in a liability position in which an increase in short-term interest rates is expected to generate lower market values of capital. At December 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018, all EVE stress tests measures were within our board policy established limits.

Interest Rate Risk to Capital 
December 31, 2019 December 31, 2018 
Change in interest
rates (basis points)
 Percentage change in
economic value of equity
 Change in interest
rates (basis points)
 Percentage change in
economic value of equity
 
 +400  –13.72% +400  –16.16%
 +300  –9.36% +300  –11.98%
 +200  –5.21% +200  –7.37%
 +100  –1.99% +100  –3.33%
 0    0   
 –100  1.68% –100  2.39%
 –200  1.55% –200  2.75%

Table of Contents

Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

FVCBankcorp, Inc. and Subsidiary

Fairfax, Virginia

CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL REPORT

December 31, 2019


C O N T E N T S

2022
CONTENTS

Page
Page

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS


Consolidated statements of condition

Consolidated statements of income

Consolidated statements of comprehensive income

(loss)

Consolidated statements of cash flows

Consolidated statements of changes in stockholders' equity

Notes to consolidated financial statements

8170 - 134109

63


Table of Contents

GRAPHIC


Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

fvcb-20221231_g1.jpg
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Stockholders and the Board of Directors and Stockholders
FVCBankcorp, Inc.
Fairfax, Virginia



Opinion on the Financial Statements

We have audited the accompanying consolidated statements of condition of FVCBankcorp, Inc. and its Subsidiarysubsidiary (the Company) as of December 31, 20192022 and 2018,2021, the related consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income (loss), cash flows and changes in stockholders'stockholders’ equity and cash flows for the years then ended, and the related notes to the consolidated financial statements (collectively, the financial statements). In our opinion, the financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of December 31, 20192022 and 2018,2021, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the years then ended, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.


Basis for Opinion

These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company'sCompany’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company'sCompany’s financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB) and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.


We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the auditaudits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. As part of our audits, we are required to obtain an understanding of internal control over financial reporting but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company'sCompany’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion.


Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

/s/ Yount, HydeYOUNT, HYDE & Barbour,BARBOUR, P.C.

We have served as the Company's auditor since 2007.

Winchester, Virginia
March 27, 2020

24, 2023

64


FVCBankcorp, Inc. and Subsidiary

Consolidated Statements of Condition

December 31, 20192022 and 2018

2021

(In thousands, except share data)

20222021
Assets
Cash and due from banks$7,253 $24,613 
Interest-bearing deposits at other financial institutions74,300 216,345 
Securities held-to-maturity (fair value of $0.3 million for both December 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively), at amortized cost264 264 
Securities available-for-sale, at fair value278,069 357,612 
Restricted stock, at cost15,612 6,372 
Loans, net of allowance for loan losses of $16.0 million and $13.8 million at December 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively1,824,394 1,490,020 
Premises and equipment, net1,220 1,584 
Accrued interest receivable9,435 8,074 
Prepaid expenses3,273 1,393 
Deferred tax assets, net18,533 8,629 
Goodwill and intangibles, net7,790 8,052 
Bank owned life insurance (BOLI)55,371 39,171 
Operating lease right-of-use assets9,680 10,167 
Other assets39,128 30,628 
Total assets$2,344,322 $2,202,924 
Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity
Liabilities
Deposits:
Noninterest-bearing$438,269 $581,293 
Interest-bearing checking, savings and money market883,480 1,071,059 
Time deposits508,413 231,417 
Total deposits$1,830,162 $1,883,769 
Federal funds purchased$30,000 $— 
FHLB advances235,000 25,000 
Subordinated notes, net of issuance costs19,565 19,510 
Accrued interest payable1,269 1,034 
Operating lease liabilities10,394 11,111 
Accrued expenses and other liabilities15,550 52,704 
Total liabilities$2,141,940 $1,993,128 
Commitments and Contingent Liabilities
Stockholders' Equity 
20222021
Preferred stock, $0.01 par value
Shares authorized1,000,000 1,000,000 
Shares issued and outstanding— — 
Common stock, $0.01 par value
Shares authorized20,000,000 20,000,000 
Shares issued and outstanding17,475,109 13,727,045 $175 $137 
Additional paid-in capital123,886 121,798 
Retained earnings114,888 89,904 
Accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income, net(36,567)(2,043)
Total stockholders' equity$202,382 $209,796 
Total liabilities and stockholders' equity$2,344,322 $2,202,924 
 
 2019 2018 

Assets

       

Cash and due from banks

 $14,916 $9,435 

Interest-bearing deposits at other financial institutions

  18,226  34,060 

Securities held-to-maturity (fair value of $0.3 million and $1.7 million at December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively)

  264  1,761 

Securities available-for-sale, at fair value

  141,325  123,537 

Restricted stock, at cost

  6,017  5,299 

Loans held for sale, at fair value

  11,198   

Loans, net of allowance for loan losses of $10.2 million and $9.2 million at December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively

  1,260,295  1,127,584 

Premises and equipment, net

  2,084  2,271 

Accrued interest receivable

  4,094  4,050 

Prepaid expenses

  546  892 

Deferred tax assets, net

  7,683  8,591 

Goodwill and intangibles, net

  8,689  8,443 

Bank owned life insurance (BOLI)

  37,069  16,406 

Other real estate owned (OREO)

  3,866  4,224 

Operating lease right-of-use assets

  13,279   

Other assets

  7,744  5,023 

Total assets

 $1,537,295 $1,351,576 

Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity

       

Liabilities

  
 
  
 
 

Deposits:

       

Noninterest-bearing

 $306,235 $233,318 

Interest-bearing checking, savings and money market

  557,148  583,736 

Time deposits

  422,339  345,386 

Total deposits

 $1,285,722 $1,162,440 

Federal funds purchased

 $10,000 $ 

FHLB advances

  15,000   

Subordinated notes, net of issuance costs

  24,487  24,407 

Accrued interest payable

  605  811 

Operating lease liabilities

  13,686   

Accrued expenses and other liabilities

  8,717  5,582 

Total liabilities

 $1,358,217 $1,193,240 

Commitments and Contingent Liabilities

Stockholders' Equity

 
 2019 2018  
  
 

Preferred stock, $0.01 par value

             

Shares authorized

  1,000,000  1,000,000       

Shares issued and outstanding

         

Common stock, $0.01 par value

  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
 

Shares authorized

  20,000,000  20,000,000       

Shares issued and outstanding

  13,902,067  13,712,615  139  137 

Additional paid-in capital

       $125,779 $123,882 

Retained earnings

        52,470  36,728 

Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), net

        690  (2,411)

Total stockholders' equity

       $179,078 $158,336 

Total liabilities and stockholders' equity

       $1,537,295 $1,351,576 

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.


65


FVCBankcorp, Inc. and Subsidiary

Consolidated Statements of Income

For the years ended December 31, 20192022 and 2018

2021

(In thousands, except per share data)

20222021
Interest and Dividend Income 
Interest and fees on loans$73,624 $63,974 
Interest and dividends on securities held-to-maturity
Interest and dividends on securities available-for-sale5,959 3,860 
Dividends on restricted stock408 328 
Interest on deposits at other financial institutions685 260 
Total interest and dividend income$80,682 $68,428 
Interest Expense
Interest on deposits$12,468 $7,601 
Interest on federal funds purchased688 — 
Interest on short-term debt1,251 346 
Interest on subordinated notes1,031 2,534 
Total interest expense$15,438 $10,481 
Net Interest Income$65,244 $57,947 
Provision for (reversal of) loan losses2,629 (500)
Net interest income after provision for (reversal of) loan losses$62,615 $58,447 
Noninterest Income
Service charges on deposit accounts$954 $1,028 
BOLI income1,200 994 
(Loss) income from minority membership interest(33)1,464 
Other income713 816 
Total noninterest income$2,834 $4,302 
Noninterest Expenses
Salaries and employee benefits$20,316 $18,980 
Occupancy and equipment expense3,252 3,290 
Data processing and network administration2,303 2,203 
State franchise taxes2,036 1,983 
Audit, legal and consulting fees1,210 1,489 
Merger and acquisition expense125 1,445 
Loan related expenses555 1,247 
FDIC insurance620 770 
Director fees668 651 
Core deposit intangible amortization262 305 
Gain on sale of other real estate owned— (236)
Tax credit amortization126 — 
Other operating expenses2,987 2,413 
Total noninterest expenses$34,460 $34,540 
Net income before income tax expense$30,989 $28,209 
Income tax expense6,005 6,276 
Net income$24,984 $21,933 
Earnings per share, basic$1.43 $1.29 
Earnings per share, diluted$1.35 $1.20 
 
 2019 2018 

Interest and Dividend Income

       

Interest and fees on loans

 $62,182 $48,216 

Interest and dividends on securities held-to-maturity

  30  51 

Interest and dividends on securities available-for-sale

  3,496  2,767 

Dividends on restricted stock

  321  291 

Interest on deposits at other financial institutions

  705  599 

Total interest and dividend income

 $66,734 $51,924 

Interest Expense

       

Interest on deposits

 $16,830 $10,354 

Interest on federal funds purchased

  145  28 

Interest on short-term debt

  116  74 

Interest on long-term debt

    74 

Interest on subordinated notes

  1,580  1,580 

Total interest expense

 $18,671 $12,110 

Net Interest Income

 $48,063 $39,814 

Provision for loan losses

  1,720  1,920 

Net interest income after provision for loan losses

 $46,343 $37,894 

Noninterest Income

       

Service charges on deposit accounts

 $890 $635 

Loss on sale of securities available-for-sale

    (462)

Gain on calls of securities held-to-maturity

  3   

Loss on loans held for sale

  (145)  

BOLI income

  662  438 

Other income

  1,136  1,050 

Total noninterest income

 $2,546 $1,661 

Noninterest Expenses

       

Salaries and employee benefits

 $17,047 $14,008 

Occupancy and equipment expense

  3,400  2,524 

Data processing and network administration

  1,638  1,233 

State franchise taxes

  1,696  1,184 

Audit, legal and consulting fees

  826  649 

Merger and acquisition expense

  133  3,339 

Loan related expenses

  476  364 

FDIC insurance

  244  469 

Marketing, business development and advertising

  396  339 

Director fees

  532  457 

Postage, courier and telephone

  195  212 

Internet banking

  439  308 

Core deposit intangible amortization

  385  118 

Other operating expenses

  1,470  1,244 

Total noninterest expenses

 $28,877 $26,448 

Net income before income tax expense

 $20,012 $13,107 

Income tax expense

  4,184  2,238 

Net income

 $15,828 $10,869 

Earnings per share, basic

 $1.15 $0.93 

Earnings per share, diluted

 $1.07 $0.85 

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.


66


FVCBankcorp, Inc. and Subsidiary

Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income

(Loss)

For the years ended December 31, 20192022 and 2018

2021

(In thousands)

20222021
Net income$24,984 $21,933 
Other comprehensive (loss) income:
Unrealized loss on securities available for sale, net of tax benefit of $11,015 and $1,226 in 2022 and 2021, respectively.(37,943)(4,404)
Unrealized gain on interest rate swaps, net of tax expense of $909 and $142 in 2022 and 2021, respectively.3,419 535 
Total other comprehensive loss$(34,524)$(3,869)
Total comprehensive (loss) income$(9,540)$18,064 
 
 2019 2018 

Net income

 $15,828 $10,869 

Other comprehensive income gain (loss):

       

Unrealized gain (loss) on securities available for sale, net of tax expense of $932 in 2019 and net of tax benefit of $389 in 2018. 

  3,164  (1,072)

Unrealized loss on interest rate swaps, net of tax benefit of $17 in 2019. 

  (63)  

Reclassification adjustment for losses realized in income, net of tax benefit of $0 and $108 for 2019 and 2018, respectively. 

    354 

Total other comprehensive income (loss)

 $3,101 $(718)

Total comprehensive income

 $18,929 $10,151 

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.


67


FVCBankcorp, Inc. and Subsidiary

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

For the Years Ended December 31, 20192022 and 2018

2021

(In thousands)

20222021
Cash Flows From Operating Activities  
Net income$24,984 $21,933 
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
Depreciation424 555 
Provision for (reversal of) loan losses2,629 (500)
Net amortization of premium of securities607 528 
Net accretion of deferred loan fees, costs, and purchase premiums(2,255)(5,830)
Net accretion of acquisition accounting adjustments(315)(442)
Gain on sale of other real estate owned— (236)
Amortization of subordinated debt issuance costs55 488 
Core deposits intangible amortization262 305 
Amortization of tax credits126 — 
Equity-based compensation expense1,183 1,011 
BOLI income(1,200)(994)
Loss (income) from minority membership interest33 (1,464)
Deferred income tax expense395 1,007 
Changes in assets and liabilities:
(Increase) decrease in accrued interest receivable, prepaid expenses and other assets(9,094)9,480 
Increase (decrease) in accrued interest payable, accrued expenses and other liabilities4,558 (6,396)
Net cash provided by operating activities$22,392 $19,445 
Cash Flows From Investing Activities
Decrease (increase) in interest-bearing deposits at other financial institutions$142,045 $(96,117)
Purchases of securities available-for-sale(47,160)(245,731)
Proceeds from maturities and calls of securities available-for-sale— 6,996 
Proceeds from paydowns of securities available-for-sale37,076 41,016 
(Increase) decrease in restricted stock(9,240)191 
Net increase in loans(334,426)(32,110)
Purchase of bank-owned life insurance(15,000)— 
Distribution received from minority owned investment1,040 — 
Proceeds from sale of OREO— 4,102 
Purchase of minority membership interest— (22,200)
Purchases of premises and equipment, net(166)(485)
Net cash used in investing activities$(225,831)$(344,338)
Cash Flows From Financing Activities
Net (decrease) increase in noninterest-bearing, interest-bearing checking, savings, and money market deposits$(330,603)$432,912 
Net increase (decrease) in time deposits276,989 (81,649)
Redemption of subordinated debt, net(1,250)(23,813)
Increase in federal funds purchased30,000 — 
Net increase in FHLB advances210,000 — 
Repurchase of shares of common stock(730)— 
Common stock issuance1,673 1,221 
Net cash provided by financing activities$186,079 $328,671 
Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents$(17,360)$3,778 
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of year24,613 20,835 
Cash and cash equivalents, end of year$7,253 $24,613 
 
 2019 2018 

Cash Flows From Operating Activities

       

Net income

 $15,828 $10,869 

Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:

       

Depreciation

  643  497 

Provision for loan losses

  1,720  1,920 

Net amortization of premium of securities

  377  534 

Net amortization of deferred loan costs and purchase premiums

  755  534 

Net accretion of acquisition accounting adjustments

  487  (64)

Gain on calls of held-to-maturity securities

  (3)  

Loss on loans held for sale

  145   

Amortization of subordinated debt issuance costs

  80  80 

Core deposits intangible amortization

  385  118 

Equity-based compensation expense

  679  707 

BOLI income

  (662) (438)

Realized losses on securities sales

    462 

Deferred income tax (benefit)

  185  (866)

Changes in assets and liabilities:

       

Increase in accrued interest receivable, prepaid expenses and other assets

  (2,044) (4,532)

Increase in accrued interest payable, accrued expenses and other liabilities

  1,826  3,520 

Net cash provided by operating activities

 $20,401 $13,341 

Cash Flows From Investing Activities

       

Maturities of certificates of deposits purchased for investment

 $245 $245 

Decrease (increase) in interest-bearing deposits at other financial institutions

  15,834  (15,047)

Purchases of securities available-for-sale

  (36,619) (37,044)

Proceeds from sales of securities available-for-sale

    23,012 

Proceeds from maturities and calls of securities held-to-maturity

  1,500   

Proceeds from maturities and calls of securities available-for-sale

  1,250   

Proceeds from maturities, calls and paydowns of securities available-for-sale

  21,055  16,938 

Net purchase of restricted stock

  (718) (470)

Net increase in loans

  (147,195) (106,324)

Proceeds from sale of OREO

  358   

Cash acquired in acquisition

    5,172 

Purchases of BOLI

  (20,000)  

Purchases of premises and equipment, net

  (311) (743)

Net cash used in investing activities

 $(164,601)$(114,261)

Cash Flows From Financing Activities

       

Net increase in noninterest-bearing, interest-bearing checking, savings, and money market deposits

 $46,329 $195,001 

Net increase (decrease) in time deposits

  77,132  (99,113)

Increase in federal funds purchased

  10,000   

Net increase (decrease) in FHLB advances

  15,000  (27,577)

Common stock issuance

  1,220  34,616 

Net cash provided by financing activities

 $149,681 $102,927 

Net increase in cash and cash equivalents

 $5,481 $2,007 

Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of year

  9,435  7,428 

Cash and cash equivalents, end of year

 $14,916 $9,435 

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.


68


FVCBankcorp, Inc. and Subsidiary

Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders' Equity

For the years ended December 31, 20192022 and 2018

2021

(In thousands)

SharesCommon
Stock
Additional
Paid-in
Capital
Retained
Earnings
Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Income (Loss)
Total
Balance at December 31, 202013,511 $135 $119,568 $67,971 $1,826 $189,500 
Net income— — — 21,933 — 21,933 
Other comprehensive income— — — — (3,869)(3,869)
Common stock issuance for options exercised182 1,219 — — 1,221 
Vesting of restricted stock grants34 — — — — — 
Stock-based compensation expense— — 1,011 — — 1,011 
Balance at December 31, 202113,727 $137 $121,798 $89,904 $(2,043)$209,796 
Net income— — — 24,984 — 24,984 
Other comprehensive loss— — — — (34,524)(34,524)
Repurchase of common stock(37)— (730)— — (730)
Common stock issuance for options exercised242 1,670 — — 1,673 
Vesting of restricted stock grants48 — — — — — 
5-for-4 stock split3,495 35 (35)— — — 
Stock-based compensation expense— — 1,183 — — 1,183 
Balance at December 31, 202217,475 $175 $123,886 $114,888 $(36,567)$202,382 
 
 Shares Common
Stock
 Additional
Paid-in
Capital
 Retained
Earnings
 Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Income (Loss)
 Total 

Balance at December 31, 2017

  10,869 $109 $74,008 $25,859 $(1,693)$98,283 

Net income

        10,869    10,869 

Other comprehensive loss

          (718) (718)

Common stock issuance at $20 per share

  1,844  18  33,457      33,475 

Common stock issuance for options exercised, net          

  221  2  1,139      1,141 

Common stock issuance for acquisition of Colombo Bank

  763  8  14,571      14,579 

Vesting of restricted stock grants

  16           

Stock-based compensation expense

      707      707 

Balance at December 31, 2018

  13,713 $137 $123,882 $36,728 $(2,411)$158,336 

Net income

        15,828    15,828 

Adoption of lease accounting standard

        (86)   (86)

Other comprehensive income

          3,101  3,101 

Common stock issuance for options exercised

  174  2  1,218      1,220 

Vesting of restricted stock grants

  15           

Stock-based compensation expense

      679      679 

Balance at December 31, 2019

  13,902  139  125,779  52,470  690 $179,078 

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.


69


Table of Contents


Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

(Dollars in thousands, except share and per share data)


Note 1. Organization and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Organization

FVCBankcorp, Inc. (the "Company"), a Virginia corporation, was formed in 2015 and is registered as a bank holding company under the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956, as amended. The Company is headquartered in Fairfax, Virginia. The Company conducts its business activities through the branch offices of its wholly owned subsidiary bank, FVCbank (the "Bank"). The Company exists primarily for the purposes of holding the stock of its subsidiary, the Bank.

The Bank was organized under the laws of the Commonwealth of Virginia to engage in a general banking business serving the Washington, D.C. metropolitan area. The Bank commenced regular operations on November 27, 2007 and is a member of the Federal Reserve System and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.System. It is subject to the regulations of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (the "Federal Reserve") and the State Corporation Commission of Virginia. Consequently, it undergoes periodic examinations by these regulatory authorities.


On October 12, 2018,August 31, 2021, the Bank made an investment in Atlantic Coast Mortgage, LLC ("ACM") for $20.4 million to obtain a 28.7% ownership interest in ACM. This ownership interest is subject to an earnback option of up to 3.7% over the next three years. As of December 31, 2022, our percentage ownership had decreased to 27.7%. In addition, the Bank provides a warehouse lending facility to ACM, which includes a construction-to-permanent financing line, and has developed portfolio mortgage products to diversify the Bank's held to investment loan portfolio. The investment is accounted for using the equity method of accounting.
On December 15, 2022, the Company announced that the completionBoard of its acquisition of Colombo Bank ("Colombo"), pursuant toDirectors approved a previously announced definitive merger agreement. Colombo, which was headquartered in Rockville, Maryland, merged into FVCbank effective October 12, 2018 adding five banking locations in Washington, D.C., and Montgomery County and the City of Baltimore in Maryland. Pursuant to the terms of the merger agreement, based on the average closing pricefive-for-four split of the Company's common stock duringin the five trading day period endedform of a 25% stock dividend for shareholders of record on October 10, 2018,January 9, 2023, payable on January 31, 2023. Earnings per share and all other per share information reflected in the second trading day prior to closing, of $19.614 (the Average Closing Price") holders of shares of Colombo common stock received 0.002217 sharesCompany's consolidated financial statements have been adjusted for the five-for-four split of the Company's common stock and $0.053157 in cash for each share of Colombo common stock held immediately prior to the effective datecomparative purposes.
In February 2023 as part of the merger, plus cashCompany’s asset/liability management process, the Bank sold $40.3 million of investment securities available-for-sale at an after-tax loss of $3.6 million to de-leverage its balance sheet and invest funds in lieuhigher-yielding assets. Also during the first quarter of fractional shares at a rate equal to the Average Closing Price, and subject to the right of holders of Colombo common stock who owned fewer than 45,086 shares of Colombo common stock after aggregation of all shares held in the same name, and who made a timely election, to receive only cash in an amount equal to $0.096649 per share of Colombo common stock. As a result2023 as part of the merger, 763,051 sharesBank’s asset/liability management process, the Bank fixed $150 million of wholesale funding through the Company's common stock were issued in exchange for outstanding sharesexecution of Colombo common stock.

pay-fixed/receive-floating interest rate swaps with a weighted-average rate of 3.50% and maturity of five years. For a full discussion of these transactions, please see Item 7.
Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, "Discussion of Analysis of Financial Condition, Overview," above.

Note 2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

The accounting and reporting policies of the Company are in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America and conform to general practices within the banking industry.

(a)
Principles of Consolidation

The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company. All material intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.

(b)
Use of Estimates

In preparing consolidated financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, management is required to make estimates, judgments, and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, and disclosures of contingent assets and contingent liabilities, at of the date of the consolidated financial statements and reported


Table of Contents


Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(Dollars in thousands, except share and per share data)

Note 2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)

amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Material estimates that are particularly susceptible to significant change in the near term relate to accounting for business combinations and impairment testing of goodwill, the allowance for loan losses, the valuation of deferred tax assets, and other-than-temporary impairment, and the valuationimpairment.

70

Table of other real estate owned.

Contents
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
(c)
Accounting for Business Combinations

Business combinations are accounted for under the purchaseacquisition method. The purchaseacquisition method requires that the assets acquired and liabilities assumed be recorded, based on their estimated fair values at the date of acquisition. The excess of the cost of an acquired entity over the net of the amounts assigned to assets acquired and liabilities assumed, including identifiable intangibles, is recorded as goodwill.

(d)
Cash and Cash Equivalents

For purposes of the statements of cash flows, cash and cash equivalents include cash on hand, amounts due from banks and federal funds sold. Generally, federal funds are purchased and sold for one day periods.

(e)
Investment Securities

Debt securities are classified as held-to-maturity and carried at amortized cost when management has the positive intent and ability to hold them to maturity. Debt securities are classified as available-for-sale when they might be sold before maturity. Securities available-for-sale are carried at fair value, with unrealized holding gains and losses reported in other comprehensive (loss) income, net of tax. Equity securities are carried at fair value, with changes in fair value reported in net income. Equity securities without readily determinable fair values are carried at cost, minus impairment, if any, plus or minus changes resulting from observable price changes in orderly transactions for the identical or a similar investment.

Gains and losses on the sale of securities are determined using the specific identification method.

The Company regularly evaluates its securities whose values have declined below their amortized cost to assess whether the decline in fair value is other-than-temporary. The Company considers various factors in determining whether a decline in fair value is other-than-temporary including the issuer's financial condition and/or future prospects, the effects of changes in interest rates or credit spreads, the expected recovery period and other quantitative and qualitative information. The valuation of securities for impairment is a process subject to estimation, judgment and uncertainty and is intended to determine whether declines in the fair value of investments should be recognized in current period earnings. The risks and uncertainties include changes in general economic conditions and future changes in assessments of the aforementioned factors. It is expected that such factors will change in the future, which may result in future other-than-temporary impairments. For impairments of debt securities that are deemed to be other-than-temporary, the credit portion of an other-than-temporary impairment loss is recognized in earnings and the non-credit portion is recognized in accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income in those situations where the Company does not intend to sell the security and it is more likely than not that the Company will not be required to sell the security prior to recovery.


Table of Contents


Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(Dollars in thousands, except share and per share data)

Note 2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)

Interest income and dividends on securities are recognized in interest income on an accrual basis. Premiums and discounts are recognized in interest income using the effective interest method. Prepayments of the mortgages securing mortgage-backed securities may affect the yield to maturity. The Company uses actual principal prepayment experience and estimates of future principal prepayments in calculating the yield necessary to apply the effective interest method.

(f)
Loans and Allowance for Loan Losses

Loans receivable that management has the intent and ability to hold for the foreseeable future or until loan maturity or pay-off are reported at their outstanding principal balance adjusted for any charge-offs, and net of the allowance for loan losses and deferred fees and costs. Loan origination fees and certain direct origination costs are deferred and amortized as an adjustment of the yield using the payment terms required by the loan contract.

During 2018,2020, as a result of the Company's acquisition of Colombo Bank ("Colombo"), the loan portfolio was segregated between loans initially accounted for under the amortized cost method (referred to as "originated" loans) and loans acquired (referred to as "acquired" loans). The loans segregated to the acquired loan portfolio were initially measured at fair value and subsequently accounted for under either Accounting Standards Codification ("ASC") Topic 310-30 or ASC Topic 310-20.

Purchased credit-impaired (PCI)("PCI") loans, which are the non-performing loans acquired in the Company's acquisition of Colombo, are loans acquired at a discount (that is due, in part, to credit quality). These loans are initially recorded at fair value (as determined by the present value of expected future cash flows) with no allowance for loan losses. The Company
71

Table of Contents
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
accounts for interest income on all loans acquired at a discount (that is due, in part, to credit quality) based on the acquired loans' expected cash flows. The acquired loans may be aggregated and accounted for as a pool of loans if the loans being aggregated have common risk characteristics. A pool is accounted for as a single asset with a single composite interest rate and an aggregate expectation of cash flow. The difference between the cash flows expected at acquisition and the investment in the loans, or the "accretable yield," is recognized as interest income utilizing the level-yield method over the life of each pool. Increases in expected cash flows subsequent to the acquisition are recognized prospectively through adjustment to any previously recognized allowance for loan loss for that pool of loans and then through an increase in the yield on the pool over its remaining life, while decreases in expected cash flows are recognized as impairment through a loss provision and an increase in the allowance for loan losses. Therefore, the allowance for loan losses on these impaired pools reflect only losses incurred after the acquisition (representing the present value of all cash flows that were expected at acquisition but currently are not expected to be received).

The Company periodically evaluates the remaining contractual required payments due and estimates of cash flows expected to be collected for PCI loans. These evaluations, performed quarterly, require the continued use of key assumptions and estimates, similar to the initial estimate of fair value. Changes in the contractual required payments due and estimated cash flows expected to be collected may result in changes in the accretable yield and non-accretable difference or reclassifications between accretable yield and the non-accretable difference. On an aggregate basis, if the acquired pools of PCI loans perform better than originally expected, the Company would expect to receive more future cash flows than originally modeled at the acquisition date. For the pools with better than expected cash


Table of Contents


Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(Dollars in thousands, except share and per share data)

Note 2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)

flows, the forecasted increase would be recorded as an additional accretable yield that is recognized as a prospective increase to the Company's interest income on loans.

Loans are generally placed into nonaccrual status when they are past-due 90 days as to either principal or interest or when, in the opinion of management, the collection of principal and/or interest is in doubt. A loan remains in nonaccrual status until the loan is current as to payment of both principal and interest or past-due less than 90 days and the borrower demonstrates the ability to pay and remain current. Loans are charged-off when a loan or a portion thereof is considered uncollectible. When cash payments are received, they are applied to principal first, then to accrued interest. It is the Company's policy not to record interest income on nonaccrual loans until principal has become current. In certain instances, accruing loans that are past due 90 days or more as to principal or interest may not go on nonaccrual status if the Company determines that the loans are well secured and are in the process of collection.

Nonperforming assets include nonaccrual loans, loans past-due 90 days or more and other real estate owned.

owned ("OREO").

The allowance for loan losses is increased or decreased by provisions for reversalor reversals of loan losses, increased by recoveries of previously charged-off loans, and decreased by loan charge-offs.

The Company maintains the allowance for loan losses at a level that represents management's best estimate of knownprobable and inherent losses in the loan portfolio. Both the amount of the provision expense and the level of the allowance for loan losses are impacted by many factors, including general and industry-specific economic conditions, actual and expected creditloan losses, historical trends and specific conditions of the individual borrowers. Unusual and infrequently occurring events, such as weather-related disasters or disease epidemics or pandemics, may impact management's assessment of possible creditloan losses. As a part of the analysis, the Company uses comparative peer group data and qualitative factors such as levels of and trends in delinquencies, nonaccrual loans, charged-off loans, changes in volume and terms of loans, effects of changes in lending policy, experience and ability and depth of management, national and local economic trends and conditions and concentrations of credit, competition, and loan review results to support estimates.

For purposes of monitoring the performance of the loan portfolio and estimating the allowance for loan losses, the Company's loans receivable portfolio is segmented as follows: commercial real estate, commercial and industrial, commercial construction, consumer residential, and consumer nonresidential.

Commercial Real Estate Loans.Loans. Commercial real estate loans are secured by both owner occupied and investor owned commercial properties, including multi-family residential real estate. Collateral for this loan type includes various types of commercial real estate, including office, retail, warehouse, industrial and other non-residential types of properties.

These loans typically involve larger loan balances concentrated with single borrowers or groups of related borrowers. Additionally, the repayment of loans secured by income-producing properties is typically dependent upon the successful
72

Table of Contents
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
operation of a business or real estate project and thus may be subject to adverse conditions in the commercial real estate market or in the general economy. The Company generally requires personal guarantees or endorsements with respect to these loans and loan-to-value ratios for real estate-commercial loans generally do not exceed 80%.


Table of Contents


Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(Dollars in thousands, except share and per share data)

Note 2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)

Commercial and Industrial Loans.Loans. The Company makes commercial loans to qualified businesses within its market area. The commercial lending portfolio consists primarily of commercial and industrial loans for a variety of business purposes, including working capital and the financing of accounts receivable, property, plant and equipment. The Company has a government contract lending group which provides secured lending to government contracting firms and businesses based primarily on receivables from the federal government.

Commercial and industrial loans generally have a higher degree of risk than other certain types of loans. Commercial loans typically are made on the basis of the borrower's ability to repay the loan from the cash flow from its business and are secured by business assets, such as commercial real estate, accounts receivable, equipment and inventory, the values of which may fluctuate over time and generally cannot be appraised with as much precision as residential real estate. As a result, the availability of funds for the repayment of commercial loans may be substantially dependent upon the commercial success of the business itself. To manage these risks, the Company's policy is to secure commercial loans originated with both the assets of the business, which are subject to the risks described above, and other additional collateral and guarantees that may be available.

Commercial Construction Loans.Loans. The Company's commercial construction loan portfolio consists of acquisition, development, and construction of commercial real estate, including multi-family properties. Our typical commercial construction loan involves property that will ultimately be leased to a non-owner occupant. Construction lending entails significant additional risks as they often involve larger loan balances concentrated with single borrowers or groups of related borrowers. Construction loans also involve additional risks since funds are advanced while the property is under construction, which property has uncertain value prior to the completion of construction. Thus, it is more difficult to accurately evaluate the total loan funds required to complete a project and related loan-to-value ratios. To reduce the risks associated with construction lending, the Company generally limits loan-to-value ratios to 80% of when-completed appraised values for owner-occupied residential or commercial properties and for investor-owned residential or commercial properties. Construction loan agreements may include provisions which allow for the payment of contractual interest from an interest reserve. Amounts drawn from an interest reserve increase the amount of the outstanding balance of the construction loan. This is an industry standard practice.

Consumer Residential.Residential. This portfolio consists primarily of home equity lines of credit ("HELOC"HELOCs") that we originate in our market areas. Our HELOCs generally have a maximum loan to value of up to 85%, however, actual loan to values are typically lower than the maximum. We have also purchased portfolios of 1-4 family residential first mortgage loans on properties located in our market area for yield and diversification.

Consumer Nonresidential.Nonresidential. The Company's consumer nonresidential loans consist primarily of installment loans made to individuals for personal, family and household purposes. In addition, we have purchased pools of unsecured consumer loans and student loans from a third party for yield and diversification.

Consumer loans may entail greater risk than certain other types of loans, particularly in the case of consumer loans that are unsecured or secured by rapidly depreciable assets, such as automobiles.

The Company's policy for consumer loans is to accept moderate risk while minimizing losses, primarily through a careful credit and financial analysis of the borrower. In evaluating consumer loans,


Table of Contents


Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(Dollars in thousands, except share and per share data)

Note 2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)

the Company requires its lending officers to review the borrower's collateral and stability of income, past credit history, amount of debt currently outstanding and the impact of these factors on the ability of the borrower to repay the loan in a timely manner.

The Company's allowance for loan losses is based first on a segmentation of its loan portfolio by general loan type, or portfolio segments. For originated loans, certain portfolio segments are further disaggregated and evaluated collectively for impairment based on loan segments, which are largely based on the type of collateral underlying each loan. For purposes of this analysis, the Company categorizes loans into one of five categories: commercial and industrial, commercial real estate, commercial construction, consumer residential, and consumer nonresidential loans. Typically, financial institutions use their historical loss experience and trends in losses for each loan category which are then adjusted for portfolio trends and economic and environmental factors in determining their allowance for loan losses. Since the Bank's inception in 2007, the Bank has experienced minimal loss history within its loan portfolio. Because of this, the allowance model uses the average
73

Table of Contents
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
loss rates of similar institutions (a custom peer group) as a baseline which is then adjusted based on the Company's particular qualitative loan portfolio characteristics and environmental factors. The indicated loss factors resulting from this analysis are applied for each of the five categories of loans.

The Company also maintains an allowance for loan losses for acquired loans when: (i) for loans accounted for under ASC 310-30, there is deterioration in credit quality subsequent to acquisition, and (ii) for loans accounted for under ASC 310-20, the inherent losses in the loans exceed the remaining discount recorded at the time of acquisition.

The allowance for loan losses consists of specific and general components. The specific component relates to loans that are determined to be impaired and, therefore, individually evaluated for impairment. The Company determines and recognizes impairment of certain loans when, based on current information and events, it is probable that the Company will be unable to collect all amounts due according to the loan agreement. A loan is not considered impaired during a period of delay in payment if the Company expects to collect all amounts due, including past-due interest. The Company individually assigns loss factors to all loans that have been identified as having loss attributes, as indicated by deterioration in the financial condition of the borrower or a decline in underlying collateral value if the loan is collateral dependent. The Company evaluates the impairment of certain loans on a loan by loan basis for those loans that are adversely risk rated. Measurement of impairment is based on the expected future cash flows of an impaired loan, which are discounted at the loan's effective interest rate, or measured on an observable market value, if one exists, or the fair value of the collateral underlying the loan, discounted to consider estimated costs to sell the collateral for collateral-dependent loans. If the net collateral value is less than the loan balance (including accrued interest and any unamortized premium or discount associated with the loan) an impairment is recognized and a specific reserve is established for the impaired loan. Loans classified as loss loans are fully reserved or charged-off.

In addition, various regulatory agencies, as part of their examination process, periodically review the Company's allowance for loan losses. These agencies may require the Company to recognize additions to the allowance based on their risk evaluation and credit judgment. Management believes that the allowance for loan losses at December 31, 20192022 and 20182021 is a reasonable estimate of knownprobable and inherent losses in the loan portfolio at those dates.


Table of Contents


Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(Dollars in thousands, except share and per share data)

Note 2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)

Loans considered to be troubled debt restructuring ("TDRs") are loans that have their terms restructured (e.g., interest rates, loan maturity date, payment and amortization period, etc.) in circumstances that provide payment relief to a borrower experiencing financial difficulty. All restructured loans are considered impaired loans and may either be in accruing status or nonaccruing status. Nonaccruing restructured loans may return to accruing status provided doubt has been removed concerning the collectability of principal and interest as evidenced by a sufficient period of payment performance in accordance with the restructured terms. Loans may be removed from the restructured category in the year subsequent to the restructuring if their revised loan terms are considered to be consistent with terms that can be obtained in the credit market for loans with comparable risk and if they meet certain performance criteria.

        During


The Company adopted Accounting Standards Update ("ASU") 2016-13 as of January 1, 2023 in accordance with the fourth quarterrequired implementation date and recorded the impact of 2019,adoption to retained earnings, net of deferred income taxes, as required by the standard. The adjustment recorded at adoption was not significant to the overall allowance for credit losses or shareholders' equity as compared to December 31, 2022 and consisted of adjustments to the allowance for credit losses on loans as well as an adjustment to the Company's reserve for unfunded commitments. Subsequent to adoption, the Company reclassified a portionwill record adjustments to its allowances for credit losses and reserves for unfunded commitments through the provision for credit losses in the consolidated statements of its consumer unsecured loan portfolio as held for sale,income.
(g)    Premises, Equipment, and recorded a loss on the market value adjustment totaling $145 thousand. This portfolio was purchased by the Company within the last two years and is not performing as expected, with recorded net charge-offs totaling $647 thousand for the year ended December 31, 2019. The Company anticipates selling these loans during 2020.

(g)
Premises and Equipment

Leases

Land is carried at cost. Premises, furniture, equipment, and leasehold improvements are carried at cost less accumulated depreciation and amortization. Depreciation of premises, furniture and equipment is computed using the straight-line method over estimated useful lives from three to seven years. Amortization of leasehold improvements is computed using the straight-line method over the useful lives of the improvements or the lease term, whichever is shorter. Purchased computer software which is capitalized is amortized over estimated useful lives of one to three years.

        On January 1, 2019, the

The Company adoptedfollows ASU No. 2016-02 "Leases (Topic 842)" and all subsequent ASUs that modified Topic 842. The Company elected the prospective application approach provided by ASU 2018-11 and did not adjust prior periods for ASC 842. There was a cumulative effect adjustment of approximately $86 thousand at adoption. The Company also elected certain practical expedients within the standard and did not reassess whether any expired or existing contracts are or contain leases, did not reassess the lease classification for any expired or existing leases and did not reassess any initial direct costs for existing leases. Prior to adoption, all of the Company's leases were classified as operating leases and remain operating leases at adoption. The implementation of the new standard resulted in recognition of a right-of-use asset of approximately $12.2 million and an offsetting lease liability of $12.7 million for leases existing at the date of adoption.

Contracts that commence subsequent to adoption are evaluated to determine whether they are or contain a lease in accordance with Topic 842. The Company has elected the practical expedient provided by Topic 842 not to allocate consideration in a contract between lease and non-lease components. The Company also elected, as provided by the standard, not to recognize right-of-use assets and lease liabilities for short-term leases, defined by the standard as leases with terms of 12 months or less.

Lease liabilities represent the Company's obligation to make lease payments and are presented at each reporting date as the net present value of the remaining contractual cash flows. Cash flows are discounted at the Company's incremental borrowing rate in effect at the commencement date of the lease. Right-of-use assets represent the Company's right to use the underlying asset for the lease term


74


Table of Contents


Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(Dollars in thousands, except share and per share data)

Note 2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)

for the lease term and are calculated as the sum of the lease liability and if applicable, prepaid rent, initial direct costs and any incentives received from the lessor.

Lease payments for short-term leases are recognized as lease expense on a straight-line basis over the lease term, or for variable lease payments, in the period in which the obligation was incurred. Payments for leases with terms longer than twelve months are included in the determination of the lease liability. Payments may be fixed for the term of the lease or variable. If the lease agreement provides a known escalator, such as a specified percentage increase per year or a stated increase at a specified time, the variable payment is included in the cash flows used to determine the lease liability. If the variable payment is based upon an unknown escalator, such as the consumer price index at a future date, the increase is not included in the cash flows used to determine the lease liability. The Company's leases provide known escalators that are included in the determination of the lease liability, with the exception of three lease agreements.

The Company's leases offer the option to extend the lease term. For each of the leases, the Company is reasonably certain it will exercise the options and has included the additional time and lease payments in the calculation of the lease liability. None of the Company's leases provide for residual value guarantees and none provide restrictions or covenants that would impact dividends or require incurring additional financial obligations.

(h)
Goodwill and Intangible Assets

Goodwill, which represents the excess of purchase price over fair value of net assets acquired, is not amortized but is evaluated at least annually for impairment by comparing its fair value with its carrying amount. Impairment is indicated when the carrying amount of a reporting unit exceeds its estimated fair value.

Goodwill arises from business combinations and is generally determined as the excess of the fair value of the consideration transferred, plus the fair value of any noncontrolling interests in the acquiree, over the fair value of the net assets acquired and liabilities assumed as of the acquisition date. Goodwill and intangible assets acquired in a purchase business combination and determined to have an indefinite useful life are not amortized, but tested for impairment at least annually or more frequently if events and circumstances exist; that indicate that a goodwill impairment test should be performed. The Company performs the annual impairment test annually during the fourth quarter. Intangible assets with definite useful lives are amortized over their estimated useful lives to their estimated residual values. Goodwill is the only intangible asset with an indefinite life on our balance sheet.

No impairment was recorded for 20192022 and 2018.

2021.
(i)
Other Real Estate Owned

Assets acquired through, or in lieu of, loan foreclosure are held for sale. At the time of acquisition, these properties are recorded at fair value less estimated selling costs, with any write down charged to the allowance for loan losses and any gain on foreclosure recorded in net income, establishing a new cost basis. Subsequent to foreclosure, valuations of the assets are periodically performed by management, and these assets are subsequently accounted for at lower of cost or fair value less estimated selling costs. Adjustments are made for subsequent decline in the fair value of the


Table of Contents


Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(Dollars in thousands, except share and per share data)

Note 2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)

assets less selling costs. Revenue and expenses from operations and valuation changes are charged to operating income in the year of the transaction. The Company did not foreclose on any properties during the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018. The Company, through its acquisition of Colombo, did acquire one residential real estate property, which was sold for its recorded value in 2019.

(j)
Bank Owned Life Insurance

The Company has purchased life insurance policies on certain key employees. Bank owned life insurance is recorded at the amount that can be realized under the insurance contract at the balance date, which is the cash surrender value. The increase in the cash surrender value over time is recorded as other non-interest income. The Company monitors the financial strength and condition of the counterparty.

counterparties.
(k)
Transfers of Financial Assets

Transfers of financial assets are accounted for as sales, when control over the assets has been surrendered. Control over transferred assets is deemed surrendered when (1) the assets have been isolated from the Company—Company – put presumptively beyond reach of the transferor and its creditors, even in bankruptcy or other receivership, (2) the transferee obtains the right (free of conditions that constrain it from taking advantage of that right) to pledge or exchange the
75

Table of Contents
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
transferred assets, and (3) the Company does not maintain effective control over the transferred assets through an agreement to repurchase them before their maturity or the ability to unilaterally cause the holder to return specific assets.

(l)
Income Taxes

Deferred taxes are provided on a liability method whereby deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for deductible temporary differences. Temporary differences are the differences between the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and their tax basis. Deferred tax assets are reduced by a valuation allowance when, in the opinion of management, it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are adjusted for the effects of changes in tax laws and rates on the date of enactment.

Deferred income tax expense results from changes in deferred tax assets and liabilities between periods. Deferred tax assets are recognized if it is more likely than not, based on the technical merits, that the tax position will be realized or sustained upon examination. The term more likely than not means a likelihood of more than 50 percent; the terms examined and upon examination also include resolution of the related appeals or litigation processes, if any. A tax position that meets the more-likely-than-not recognition threshold is initially and subsequently measured as the largest amount of tax benefit that has a greater than 50 percent likelihood of being realized upon settlement with a taxing authority that has full knowledge of all relevant information. The determination of whether or not a tax position has met the more-likely-than-not recognition threshold considers the facts, circumstances, and information available at the reporting date and is subject to management's judgment. The Company had no such liability recorded as of December 31, 20192022 and 2018.2021. Deferred tax assets are reduced by a valuation allowance if, based on the weight of evidence available, it is more likely than not that some portion or all of a deferred tax asset will not be realized.


Table of Contents


Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(Dollars in thousands, except share and per share data)

Note 2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)

(m)
Comprehensive Income (Loss)

Comprehensive income (loss) consists of net income and other comprehensive income.income (loss). Other comprehensive income (loss) includes unrealized gains (losses) on securities available-for-sale and interest rate swaps for 2019,2022 and 2021, which are also recognized as separate components of equity. Items reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) to net income relate solely to realized gains (losses) on sales of securities available-for-sale and appear under the caption "Gain (loss) on sale of securities available-for-sale" in the Company's consolidated statements of income.

(n)
Fair Value of Financial Instruments

Fair values of financial instruments are estimated using relevant market information and other assumptions, as more fully disclosed in Note 17.16. Fair value estimates involve uncertainties and matters of significant judgment. Changes in assumptions or in market conditions could significantly affect the estimates.

(o)
Equity-based Compensation

The Company recognizes in the income statement the grant date fair value of stock options and other equity-based compensation. The Company classifies stock awards as either an equity award or a liability award. Equity classified awards are valued as of the grant date using either an observable market price or a valuation methodology. Liability classified awards are valued at fair value at each reporting date. For the periodsyears presented, all of the Company's stock options are classified as equity awards.

The fair value related to forfeitures of stock options and other equity-based compensation are recorded to the income statement as they occur, reducing equity-based compensation expense in that period. During 2017,2018, the Company began granting restricted stock units which are granted at the fair market value of the Company's common stock on the grant date. Most restricted stock units vest in one-quarter increments on the anniversary date of the grant. The Company did not grant stock options in the years ended December 31, 20192022 and 2018.

2021.
(p)
401(k) Plan

Employee 401(k) plan expense is the amount of matching contributions paid by the Company. 401(k) plan expense was $367$424 thousand and $280$377 thousand for the years ended December 31, 20192022 and 2018,2021, respectively.

76

Table of Contents
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
(q)
Earnings Per Share

Basic earnings per share represent income available to common shareholders divided by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted earnings per share reflect additional common shares that would have been outstanding if dilutive potential common shares had been issued, as well as any adjustment to income that would result from the assumed issuance. Common stock equivalents that may be issued by the Company consist primarily of outstanding stock options and restricted stock units, and the dilutive potential common shares resulting from outstanding stock options and restricted stock units are determined using the treasury method. The effects of anti-dilutive common stock equivalents are excluded from the calculation of diluted earnings per share.


(r)    Reclassifications

Table of Contents


Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(Dollars in thousands, except share and per share data)

Note 2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)

(r)
Reclassifications

Certain prior year amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current year's method of presentation. None of these reclassifications were significant.

(s)
Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In June 2016, the FASBFinancial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued ASU No. 2016-13, "Financial Instruments—Instruments – Credit Losses (Topic 326): Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments."Instruments" that introduced the current expected credit losses ("CECL") model. The amendments in this ASU, among other things, require the measurement of all expected credit losses for financial assets held at the reporting date based on historical experience, current conditions, and reasonable and supportable forecasts. Financial institutions and other organizations will now use forward-looking information to better inform their credit loss estimates. Many of the loss estimation techniques applied todaypreviously will still be permitted, although the inputs to those techniques will change to reflect the full amount of expected credit losses. In addition, the ASU amends the accounting for credit losses on available-for-sale debt securities and purchased financial assets with credit deterioration. AtThe FASB has issued multiple updates to ASU 2016-13 as codified in Topic 326, including ASUs 2019-04, 2019-05, 2019-10, 2019-11, 2020-02, and 2020-03. These ASUs have provided for various minor technical corrections and improvements to the FASB's October 16, 2019 meeting,codification as well as other transition matters. The Company adopted ASU 2016-13 as of January 1, 2023 in accordance with the Board affirmed its decision to amend the effective date of this ASU for many companies. Public business entities that are SEC filers, excluding those meeting the smaller reporting company definition, will retain the initial required implementation date and recorded the impact of fiscal years,adoption to retained earnings, net of deferred income taxes, as required by the standard. The adjustment recorded at adoption was not significant to the overall allowance for credit losses or shareholders' equity as compared to December 31, 2022 and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2019. All other entitiesconsisted of adjustments to the allowance for credit losses on loans as well as an adjustment to the Company's reserve for unfunded commitments. Subsequent to adoption, the Company will be requiredrecord adjustments to applyits allowances for credit losses and reserves for unfunded commitments through the guidanceprovision for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2022. credit losses in the consolidated statements of income.
The Company has identifiedis utilizing a third party vendorthird-party model to assist in the measurementtabulate its estimate of current expected credit losses, under this standard.using a discounted cash flow ("DCF") methodology. In accordance with ASC 326, the Company has segmented its loan portfolio based on similar risk characteristics which included loan type. The Company primarily utilizes national unemployment for its reasonable and supportable forecasting of current expected credit losses. To further adjust the allowance for credit losses for expected losses not already within the quantitative component of the calculation, the Company may consider qualitative factors as prescribed in ASC 326. The Company's CECL implementation committee has completedprocess was overseen by the Allowance for Credit Losses Committee and included an assessment of data availability and gap analysis, data collection, process, validated the data inputs,consideration and is in the initial phasesanalysis of evaluating various allowancemultiple loss estimation methodologies, for certain loan segments withinand assessment of relevant qualitative factors and correlation analysis of multiple potential loss drivers and their impact on the Company's loan portfolio. The Company is currently evaluating the implementation of ASU 2016-13 due to the change in implementation dates for smaller reporting companies included in the FASB's Exposure Draft.

historical loss experience.

In January 2017,March 2020, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-04, "Intangibles—Goodwill2020-04 "Reference Rate Reform (Topic 848): Facilitation of the Effects of Reference Rate Reform on Financial Reporting." These amendments provide temporary optional guidance to ease the potential burden in accounting for reference rate reform. The ASU provides optional expedients and Other (Topic 350): Simplifyingexceptions for applying generally accepted accounting principles to contract modifications and hedging relationships, subject to meeting certain criteria, that reference the TestLondon Interbank Offered Rate ("LIBOR") or another reference rate expected to be discontinued. It is intended to help stakeholders during the global market-wide reference rate transition period. The guidance is effective for Goodwill Impairment." The amendmentsall entities as of March 12, 2020 through December 31, 2022. Subsequently, in this ASU simplify how an entity is required to test goodwill for impairment by eliminating Step 2 from the goodwill impairment test. Step 2 measures a goodwill impairment loss by comparing the implied fair value of a reporting unit's goodwill with the carrying amount of that goodwill. Instead, under the amendments in this ASU, an entity should perform its annual, or interim, goodwill impairment test by comparing the fair value of a reporting unit with its carrying amount. An entity still has the option to perform the qualitative assessment for a reporting unit to determine if the quantitative impairment test is necessary. Public business entities that are SEC filers should adopt the amendments in this ASU for annual or interim goodwill impairment tests in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019. Early adoption is permitted for interim or annual goodwill impairment tests performed on testing dates after January 1, 2017. The Company does not expect the adoption of ASU 2017-04 to have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.

        In August 2018,2021, the FASB issued ASU 2018-13, "Fair Value Measurement2021-01 "Reference Rate Reform (Topic 820)848): Disclosure Framework—Changes to the Disclosure Requirements for Fair Value Measurement.Scope." The amendments modify the disclosure requirementsThis ASU clarifies that certain optional expedients and exceptions in Topic 820848 for contract modifications and hedge accounting apply to add disclosures regarding changesderivatives that are affected by the discounting transition. The ASU also amends the expedients and exceptions in unrealized gainsTopic 848 to capture the incremental consequences of the scope clarification and losses,to tailor the range and weighted average of significant unobservable inputs usedexisting guidance to develop Level 3 fair value measurements andderivative instruments affected by the narrative description of measurement uncertainty. Certain

discounting transition. An entity may elect to apply ASU 2021-01 on contract modifications that change the interest

77


Table of Contents


Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(Dollars in thousands, except share and per share data)

Note 2. Summary

rate used for margining, discounting, or contract price alignment retrospectively as of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)

disclosure requirements in Topic 820 are also removed or modified. The amendments are effective for fiscal yearsany date from the beginning after December 15, 2019, and interim periods within those fiscal years. Certain of the amendmentsinterim period that includes March 12, 2020, or prospectively to new modifications from any date within the interim period that includes or is subsequent to January 7, 2021, up to the date that financial statements are available to be applied prospectively while others areissued. An entity may elect to apply ASU 2021-01 to eligible hedging relationships existing as of the beginning of the interim period that includes March 12, 2020, and to new eligible hedging relationships entered into after the beginning of the interim period that includes March 12, 2020.

We have certain loans, interest rate swap agreements, investment securities, and debt obligations with interest rates indexed to LIBOR. The administrator of LIBOR announced that the most commonly used U.S. dollar LIBOR settings would cease to be applied retrospectively. Early adoptionpublished or cease to be representative after June 30, 2023. Central banks and regulators around the world have commissioned working groups to find suitable replacements for IBOR and other benchmark rates and to implement financial benchmark reforms more generally. There continues to be uncertainty regarding the use of alternative reference rates ("ARRs"), which may cause disruptions in a variety of markets, as well as adversely impact our business, operations and financial results.

The Adjustable Interest Rate (LIBOR) Act, enacted in March 2022, provides a statutory framework to replace LIBOR with a benchmark rate based on Secured Overnight Funding Rate ("SOFR") for contracts governed by U.S. law that have no or ineffective fallbacks. Although governmental authorities have endeavored to facilitate an orderly discontinuation of LIBOR, no assurance can be provided that this aim will be achieved or that the use, level, and volatility of LIBOR or other interest rates, or the value of LIBOR-based securities will not be adversely affected.
To facilitate an orderly transition from interbank offered rates and other benchmark rates to alternative reference rates ARRs, the Company has established an enterprise-wide initiative led by senior management. The objective of this initiative is permitted. The Company does not expectto identify, assess and monitor risks associated with the adoptionexpected discontinuation or unavailability of ASU 2018-13benchmarks, including LIBOR, achieve operational readiness and engage impacted clients in connection with the transition to have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.

        In April 2019, the FASB issued ASU 2019-04, "Codification Improvements to Topic 326, Financial Instruments—Credit Losses, Topic 815, Derivatives and Hedging, and Topic 825, Financial Instruments." This ASU clarifies and improves areas of guidance related to the recently issued standards on credit losses, hedging, and recognition and measurement including improvements resulting from various TRG Meetings. The amendments are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019, and interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption is permitted.ARRs. The Company is currently assessing ASU 2020-04 and its impact on the impact that ASU 2019-04 will have onCompany's transition away from LIBOR for its consolidatedloan and other financial statements.

instruments.

In May 2019, the FASB issued ASU 2019-05, "Financial Instruments—Credit Losses (Topic 326): Targeted Transition Relief." The amendments in this ASU provide entities that have certain instruments within the scope of Subtopic 326-20 with an option to irrevocably elect the fair value option in Subtopic 825-10, applied on an instrument-by-instrument basis for eligible instruments, upon the adoption of Topic 326. The fair value option election does not apply to held-to-maturity debt securities. An entity that elects the fair value option should subsequently measure those instruments at fair value with changes in fair value flowing through earnings. The amendments are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019, and interim periods within those fiscal years. The amendments should be applied on a modified-retrospective basis by means of a cumulative-effect adjustment to the opening balance of retained earnings balance in the balance sheet. Early adoption is permitted. The Company is currently assessing the impact that ASU 2019-05 will have on its consolidated financial statements.

        In November 2019, the FASB issued ASU 2019-11, "Codification Improvements to Topic 326, Financial Instruments—Credit Losses." This ASU addresses issues raised by stakeholders during the implementation of ASU No. 2016-13, "Financial Instruments—Credit Losses (Topic 326): Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments." Among other narrow-scope improvements, the new ASU clarifies guidance around how to report expected recoveries. "Expected recoveries" describes a situation in which an organization recognizes a full or partial write-off of the amortized cost basis of a financial asset, but then later determines that the amount written off, or a portion of that amount, will in fact be recovered. While applying the credit losses standard, stakeholders questioned whether expected recoveries were permitted on assets that had already shown credit deterioration at the time of purchase (also known as PCD assets). In response to this question, the ASU permits organizations to record expected recoveries on PCD assets. In addition to other narrow technical improvements, the ASU also reinforces existing guidance that prohibits organizations from recording negative allowances for available-for-sale debt securities. The ASU includes effective dates and transition requirements that vary depending on whether or not an entity has already adopted ASU 2016-13. The Company is currently assessing the impact that ASU 2019-11 will have on its consolidated financial statements.

        In December 2019, the FASB issued ASU 2019-12, "Income Taxes (Topic 740)—Simplifying the Accounting for Income Taxes." The ASU is expected to reduce cost and complexity related to the accounting for income taxes by removing specific exceptions to general principles in Topic 740


Table of Contents


Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(Dollars in thousands, except share and per share data)

Note 2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)

(eliminating the need for an organization to analyze whether certain exceptions apply in a given period) and improving financial statement preparers' application of certain income tax-related guidance. This ASU is part of the FASB's simplification initiative to make narrow-scope simplifications and improvements to accounting standards through a series of short-term projects. For public business entities, the amendments are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2020, and interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption is permitted. The Company is currently assessing the impact that ASU 2019-12 will have on its consolidated financial statements.

        In JanuaryAugust 2020, the FASB issued ASU 2020-01, "Investments—Equity Securities (Topic 321), Investments—Equity Method2020-06 "Debt - Debt with Conversion and Joint Ventures (Topic 323),Other Options (Subtopic 470-20) and Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815)—Clarifying the Interactions between Topic 321, Topic 323,- Contracts in Entity's Own Equity (Subtopic 815-40): Accounting for Convertible Instruments and Topic 815.Contracts in an Entity's Own Equity." The ASU is based onsimplifies accounting for convertible instruments by removing major separation models required under current GAAP. Consequently, more convertible debt instruments will be reported as a consensus ofsingle liability instrument and more convertible preferred stock as a single equity instrument with no separate accounting for embedded conversion features. The ASU removes certain settlement conditions that are required for equity contracts to qualify for the Emerging Issues Task Force and is expectedderivative scope exception, which will permit more equity contracts to qualify for it. The ASU also simplifies the diluted earnings per share calculation in certain areas. In addition, the amendment updates the disclosure requirements for convertible instruments to increase comparability in accounting for these transactions. ASU 2016-01 made targeted improvements to accounting for financial instruments, including providing an entity the ability to measure certain equity securities without a readily determinable fair value at cost, less any impairment, plus or minus changes resulting from observable price changes in orderly transactions for the identical or a similar investment of the same issuer. Among other topics, the amendments clarify that an entity should consider observable transactions that require it to either apply or discontinue the equity method of accounting.information transparency. For public business entities, excluding smaller reporting companies, the amendments in the ASU are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2020,2021, and interim periods within those fiscal years. For all other entities, including the Company, the standard will be effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2023, including interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption is permitted. The Company does not expect the adoption of ASU 2020-012020-06 to have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.

        Effective November 25, 2019,

In October 2021, the SEC adopted StaffFASB issued ASU 2021-08, "Business Combinations (Topic 805): Accounting Bulletin (SAB) 119. SAB 119 updated portionsfor Contract Assets and Contract Liabilities from Contracts with Customers." The ASU requires entities to apply Topic 606 to recognize and measure contract assets and contract liabilities in a business combination. The amendments improve comparability after the business combination by providing consistent recognition and measurement guidance for revenue contracts with customers acquired in a business combination and revenue contracts with customers not acquired in a business combination. The ASU is effective for fiscal years, including interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2022. Entities should apply the amendments prospectively and early adoption is permitted. The Company does not expect the adoption of SEC interpretative guidanceASU 2021-08 to align withhave a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.
In March 2022, the FASB ASC 326,issued ASU 2022-02, "Financial Instruments—Credit Losses.Instruments-Credit Losses (Topic 326), Troubled Debt Restructurings and Vintage Disclosures." It covers topics including (1) measuring current expected credit losses; (2) development, governance, and documentationASU 2022-02 addresses areas identified by the FASB as part of a systematic methodology; (3) documenting the results of a systematic methodology; and (4) validating a systematic methodology.

Note 3. Business Combinations

        On October 12, 2018, the Company acquired Colombo, a commercial bank with approximately $199 million in assets, after purchase accounting adjustments. Based on an average closing priceits post-implementation review of the Company's common stock duringcredit losses standard (ASU 2016-13) that introduced the five trading day period ended on October 10, 2018 of $19.614 (the "Average Closing Price"),CECL model. The amendments eliminate the shareholders of Colombo common stock received 0.002217 shares ofaccounting guidance for TDRs by creditors that have adopted the Company's common stockCECL model and $0.053157 in cashenhance the disclosure requirements for each share of Colombo common stock held, plus cash in lieu of fractional shares atloan refinancings and restructurings made with borrowers experiencing financial difficulty. In addition, the amendments require a rate equalpublic business entity to the Average Closing Price,disclose current-period gross write-offs for financing receivables and subject to the right of holders of Colombo common stock who own fewer than 45,086 shares of Colombo common stock after aggregation of all shares held in the same name, and who made a timely election, to receive only cash in an amount equal to $0.096649 per share of Colombo common stock. As a result of the merger, 763,051 shares of the Company's common stock and $18.3 million in cash were issued in exchange for outstanding shares of Colombo common stock. Total consideration for the acquisition was $32.9 million.

        Merger and acquisition expense for 2018 was $3.3 million which was mainly related to legal and accounting cost, system conversion and integration expenses, employee retention and severance


78


Table of Contents


Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(Dollars in thousands, except share and per share data)

Note 3. Business Combinations (Continued)

payments. In 2019, $133 thousand

net investment in leases by year of primarily legal and contract termination expenses associated with the Colombo acquisition was recorded.

        The following table sets forth the assets acquired and liabilities assumedorigination in the acquisition at their estimatedvintage disclosures. The amendments in this ASU should be applied prospectively, except for the transition method related to the recognition and measurement of TDRs, an entity has the option to apply a modified retrospective transition method, resulting in a cumulative-effect adjustment to retained earnings in the period of adoption. For entities that have adopted ASU 2016-13, ASU 2022-02 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2022, including interim periods within those fiscal years. For entities that have not yet adopted ASU 2016-13. the effective dates for ASU 2022-02 are the same as the effective dates in ASU 2016-13. Early adoption is permitted if an entity has adopted ASU 2016-13. An entity may elect to early adopt the amendments about TDRs and related disclosure enhancements separately from the amendments related to vintage disclosures. The Company does not expect the adoption of ASU 2022-02 to have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.

In March 2022, the FASB issued ASU 2022-01, "Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815), Fair Value Hedging-Portfolio Layer Method." ASU 2022-01 clarifies the guidance in ASC 815 on fair values asvalue hedge accounting of interest rate risk for portfolios of financial assets and is intended to better align hedge accounting with an organization's risk management strategies. In 2017, FASB issued ASU 2017-12 to better align the economic results of risk management activities with hedge accounting. One of the closingmajor provisions of that standard was the addition of the last-of-layer hedging method. For a closed portfolio of fixed-rate prepayable financial assets or one of more beneficial interests secured by a portfolio of prepayable financial instruments, such as mortgages or mortgage-backed securities, the last-of-layer method allows an entity to hedge its exposure to fair value changes due to changes in interest rates for a portion of the portfolio that is not expected to be affected by prepayments, defaults, and other events affecting the timing and amount of cash flows. ASU 2022-01 renames that method the portfolio layer method. For public business entities, ASC 2022-01 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2022, and interim periods within those fiscal years. The Company does not expect the adoption of ASU 2022-01 to have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.
In June 2022, the FASB issued ASU 2022-03, "Fair Value Measurement (Topic 820): Fair Value Measurement of Equity Securities Subject to Contractual Sale Restrictions". ASU 2022-03 clarifies that a contractual restriction on the sale of an equity security is not considered part of the unit of account of the equity security and, therefore, is not conisdered in measuring fiar value. The ASU is effective for fiscal years, including interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2023. Early adoption is permitted. The Company does not expect the adoption of ASU 2022-03 to have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.
In December 2022, the FASB issued ASU 2022-06, "Reference Rate Reform (Topic 848): Deferral of the Sunset Date of Topic 848". ASU 2022-06 extends the period of time preparers can utilize the reference rate reform relief guidance in Topic 848. The objective of the guidance in Topic 848 is to provide relief during the temporary transition period, so the FASB included a sunset provision within Topic 848 based on expectations of when the LIBOR would would cease being published. In 2021, the administrator of LIBOR delayed the intended cessation date of certain tenors of LIBOR to June 30, 2023. To ensure the transactions:

 
 October 12, 2018 

Assets acquired:

    

Cash and cash equivalents

 $23,469 

Interest-bearing deposits

  3,874 

Securities available-for-sale

  12,732 

Restricted stock, at cost

  1,391 

Loans

  142,593 

Premises and equipment

  789 

Deferred tax assets, net

  4,289 

Goodwill

  6,512 

Core deposit intangible, net

  1,950 

Accrued interest receivable

  406 

Prepaid expense

  161 

Other real estate owned (OREO)

  358 

Other assets

  638 

Total assets acquired

 $199,162 

Liabilities assumed:

    

Deposits:

    

Non-interest bearing

 $19,080 

Interest-bearing checking, savings and money market

  48,426 

Time deposits

  70,778 

Total deposits

  138,284 

FHLB advances

  27,577 

Accrued interest payable

  127 

Accrued expenses and other liabilities

  294 

Total liabilities assumed:

 $166,282 

Total consideration paid

 $32,880 

        The fair value estimates were subject to change for up to one year afterrelief in Topic 848 covers the closingperiod of time during which a significant number of modifications may take place, the ASU defers the sunset date of Topic 848 from December 31, 2022, to December 31, 2024, after which entities will no longer be permitted to apply the transaction if additional information relative to closing dates fair values becomes available.

        Subsequent to the purchase, management made a measurement period adjustment of $663 thousandrelief in Topic 848. The ASU is effective for a purchase credit impaired loan inadvertently included in the purchase performing loan categoryall entities upon issuance. The Company is assessing ASU 2022-06 and for deferred tax assets basedits impact on the additional credit markCompany's transition away from LIBOR for its loan and final tax returnother financial instruments.

(t)    Recently Adopted Accounting Developments
In May 2021, the FASB issued ASU 2021-04, "Earnings Per Share (Topic 260), Debt - Modifications and Extinguishments (Subtopic 470-50), Compensation - Stock Compensation (Topic 718), Derivatives and Hedging - Contracts in Entity's Own Equity (Subtopic 815-40): Issuer's Accounting for Certain Modifications or Exchanges of Colombo.

Freestanding Equity - Classified Written Call Options (a consensus of FASB Emerging Issues Task Force)." The ASU addresses how an issuer should account for modifications or an exchange of freestanding written call options classified as equity that is not within the scope of another Topic. Early adoption is permitted. ASU 2021-04 was effective for the Company on January 1, 2022 and resulted in no material impact.

79


Table of Contents


Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(Dollars in thousands, except share and per share data)

Note 3. Business Combinations (Continued)

Fair Value Measurement of Assets Acquired and Liabilities Assumed

        Below are the methods used to determine the fair values of the significant assets acquired and liabilities assumed in the acquisition.

        Cash and cash equivalents.    The carrying amount of cash and cash equivalents was used as a reasonable estimate of fair value.

        Interest-bearing deposits.    The carrying amount of interest-bearing deposits was used as a reasonable estimate of fair value.

        Investment securities available-for-sale.    The estimated fair value of investment securities available-for-sale was based on proceeds received from sale of securities immediately after consummation of acquisition.

        Restricted stocks.    The carrying amount of restricted stocks was used as a reasonable estimate of fair value. These investments are carried at cost as no active trading market exists.

        Loans.    The acquired loan portfolio was segregated into one of two categories for valuation purposes: PCI and performing loans. PCI loans were identified as those loans that were nonaccrual prior to the business combination and those loans that had been identified as potentially impaired. Potentially impaired loans were those loans that were identified during the credit review process where there was an indication that the borrower did not have sufficient cash flows to service the loan in accordance with its terms. Performing loans were those loans that were currently performing in accordance with the loan contract and do not appear to have any significant credit issues.

        For loans that were identified as performing, the fair values were determined using a discounted cash flow analysis (the "income approach"). Performing loans were segmented into pools based on loan type (commercial real estate, commercial and industrial, commercial construction, consumer residential and consumer nonresidential), and further segmented based on payment structure (fully amortizing, non-fully amortizing balloon, or interest only), rate type (fixed versus variable), and remaining maturity. The estimated cash flows expected to be collected for each loan was determined using a valuation model that included the following key assumptions: prepayment speeds, expected credit loss rates and discount rates. Prepayment speeds were influenced by many factors including, but not limited to, current yields, historic rate trends, payment types, interest rate type, and the duration of the individual loan. Expected credit loss rates were based on recent and historical default and loss rates observed for loans with similar characteristics, and further influenced by a credit review by management and a third party consultant on a selection of loans within the acquired portfolio. The discount rates used were based on rates market participants might charge for cash flows with similar risk characteristics at the acquisition date. These assumptions were developed based on management discussions and third party professional experience.

        For loans that were identified as PCI, either the above income approach was used or the asset approach was used. The income approach was used for PCI loans where there was an expectation that the borrower would more likely than not continue to pay based on the current terms of the loan contract. Management used the asset approach for all nonaccrual loans to reflect market participant assumptions. Under the asset approach, the fair value of each loan was determined based on the estimated values of the underlying collateral.


Table of Contents


Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(Dollars in thousands, except share and per share data)

Note 3. Business Combinations (Continued)

        The methods used to estimate the Level 3 fair values of loans are extremely sensitive to the assumptions and estimates used. While management attempted to use assumptions and estimates that best reflected the acquired loan portfolios and current market conditions, a greater degree of subjectivity is inherent in these values than in those determined in active markets.

        The difference between the fair value and the expected cash flows from acquired loans will be accreted to interest income over the remaining term of the loans in accordance with ASC Topic 310-30, "Loans and Debt Securities Acquired with Deteriorated Credit Quality." See Note 5 for further details.

        Premises and equipment.    The land and building acquired were recorded at fair value as determined by the current tax assessment at acquisition date.

        Other real estate owned (OREO).    OREO was recorded at fair value based on an existing purchase contract.

        Core deposit intangible.    Core deposit intangibles ("CDI") are measures of the value of noninterest checking, savings, interest-bearing checking, and money market deposits that are acquired in a business combination excluding certificates of deposit with balances over $250,000 and high yielding interest bearing deposit accounts, which the Company determines customer related intangible assets as non-existent. The fair value of the CDI stemming from any business combination is based on the present value of the expected cost savings attributable to the core deposit funding, relative to an alternative funding source. The CDI is being amortized over an estimated useful life of 9.8 years to approximate the existing deposit relationships acquired.

        Deposits.    The fair values of deposit liabilities with no stated maturity (non-interest checking, savings, interest-bearing checking, and money market deposits) are equal to the carrying amounts payable on demand. The fair values of the certificates of deposit represent contractual cash flows, discounted to present value using interest rates currently offered by market participants on deposits with similar characteristics and remaining maturities.

        Federal Home Loan Bank ("FHLB") advances.    The fair value of FHLB advances was determined based on the repayment amount as all acquired advances were repaid immediately following the acquisition.


Table of Contents


Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(Dollars in thousands, except share and per share data)

Note 4.3. Investment Securities and Other Investments

Amortized cost and fair values of securities held-to-maturity and securities available-for-sale as of December 31, 20192022 and 2018,2021, are as follows:

December 31, 2022
Amortized
Cost
Gross
Unrealized
Gains
Gross
Unrealized
(Losses)
Fair
Value
Held-to-maturity
Securities of state and local municipalities tax exempt$264 $— $(12)$252 
Total Held-to-maturity Securities$264 $— $(12)$252 
Available-for-sale
Securities of U.S. government and federal agencies$13,559 $— $(2,555)$11,004 
Securities of state and local municipalities tax exempt1,385 — (9)1,376 
Securities of state and local municipalities taxable506 — (62)444 
Corporate bonds21,212 — (2,154)19,058 
SBA pass-through securities74 — (7)67 
Mortgage-backed securities282,858 — (45,424)237,434 
Collateralized mortgage obligations9,998 — (1,312)8,686 
Total Available-for-sale Securities$329,592 $— $(51,523)$278,069 
 
 December 31, 2019 
 
 Amortized
Cost
 Gross
Unrealized
Gains
 Gross
Unrealized
(Losses)
 Fair
Value
 

Held-to-maturity

             

Securities of state and local municipalities tax exempt

 $264 $6 $ $270 

Total Held-to-maturity Securities

 $264 $6 $ $270 

Available-for-sale

             

Securities of U.S. government and federal agencies

 $4,000 $ $(4)$3,996 

Securities of state and local municipalities tax exempt

  3,662  76    3,738 

Securities of state and local municipalities taxable

  969    (14) 955 

Corporate bonds

  6,984  78  (81) 6,981 

SBA pass-through securities

  163    (4) 159 

Mortgage-backed securities

  96,358  1,077  (246) 97,189 

Collateralized mortgage obligations

  28,236  290  (219) 28,307 

Total Available-for-sale Securities

 $140,372 $1,521 $(568)$141,325 


December 31, 2021
Amortized
Cost
Gross
Unrealized
Gains
Gross
Unrealized
(Losses)
Fair
Value
Held-to-maturity
Securities of state and local municipalities tax exempt$264 $$— $270 
Total Held-to-maturity Securities$264 $$— $270 
Available-for-sale
Securities of U.S. government and federal agencies$13,557 $— $(283)$13,274 
Securities of state and local municipalities tax exempt1,393 58 — 1,451 
Securities of state and local municipalities taxable607 — (11)596 
Corporate bonds13,970 259 (78)14,151 
SBA pass-through securities107 — 108 
Mortgage-backed securities316,313 1,352 (3,827)313,838 
Collateralized mortgage obligations14,230 113 (149)14,194 
Total Available-for-sale Securities$360,177 $1,783 $(4,348)$357,612 
 
 December 31, 2018 
 
 Amortized
Cost
 Gross
Unrealized
Gains
 Gross
Unrealized
(Losses)
 Fair
Value
 

Held-to-maturity

             

Securities of state and local municipalities tax exempt

 $264 $ $(6)$258 

Securities of U.S. government and federal agencies

  1,497    (20) 1,477 

Total Held-to-maturity Securities

 $1,761 $ $(26)$1,735 

Available-for-sale

             

Securities of U.S. government and federal agencies

 $1,000 $ $(44)$956 

Securities of state and local municipalities tax exempt

  3,678    (39) 3,639 

Securities of state and local municipalities taxable

  2,378    (70) 2,308 

Corporate bonds

  5,000  92  (79) 5,013 

Certificates of deposit

  245    (1) 244 

SBA pass-through securities

  200    (5) 195 

Mortgage-backed securities

  90,234  94  (2,291) 88,037 

Collateralized mortgage obligations

  23,945  10  (810) 23,145 

Total Available-for-sale Securities

 $126,680 $196 $(3,339)$123,537 

The Company had securities with a market value of $11.3$4.1 million and $0$5.8 million pledged with the Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond (the "Federal Reserve Bank""FRB") for the years ended December 31, 20192022 and 2018,2021, respectively.


TableThe Company had securities with a market value of Contents


Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(Dollars in thousands, except share$104.6 million and per share data)

Note 4. Investment Securities and Other Investments (Continued)

        There were no securities$79.7 million pledged with the Treasury Board of Virginia at the Community Bankers' Bank atfor the years ended December 31, 2019. There were securities with a market value of $8.1 million pledged as of December 31, 2018.

2022 and 2021, respectively.

The following table shows fair value and gross unrealized losses for available-for-sale and held-to-maturity securities, aggregated by investment category and length of time that individual securities have been in a continuous unrealized loss
80

Table of Contents
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
position, at December 31, 20192022 and 2018,2021, respectively. The reference point for determining when securities are in an unrealized loss position is month-end. Therefore, it is possible that a security's market value exceeded its amortized cost on other days during the prior twelve-month period. Securities that have been in a continuous unrealized loss position are as follows:

Less Than 12 Months12 Months or LongerTotal
At December 31, 2022
Fair
Value
Unrealized
Losses
Fair
Value
Unrealized
Losses
Fair
Value
Unrealized
Losses
Securities of U.S. government and federal agencies$— 0$— $11,004 $(2,555)$11,004 $(2,555)
Securities of state and local municipalities tax exempt1,628 (21)— — 1,628 (21)
Securities of state and local municipalities taxable— — 444 (62)444 (62)
Corporate bonds12,344 (1,119)5,964 (1,035)18,308 (2,154)
SBA pass-through securities— — 67 (7)67 (7)
Mortgage-backed securities26,486 (1,831)210,948 (43,593)237,434 (45,424)
Collateralized mortgage obligations2,601 (238)6,085 (1,074)8,686 (1,312)
Total$43,059 $(3,209)$234,512 $(48,326)$277,571 $(51,535)
 
 Less Than 12 Months 12 Months or Longer Total 
At December 31, 2019
 Fair
Value
 Unrealized
Losses
 Fair
Value
 Unrealized
Losses
 Fair
Value
 Unrealized
Losses
 

Securities of U.S. government and federal agencies

 $2,997 $(3)$999 $(1)$3,996 $(4)

Securities of state and local municipalities taxable

      955  (14) 955  (14)

Corporate bonds

  2,463  (22) 941  (59) 3,404  (81)

SBA pass-through securities

      159  (4) 159  (4)

Mortgage-backed securities

  15,529  (73) 20,475  (173) 36,004  (246)

Collateralized mortgage obligations

  7,479  (94) 7,975  (125) 15,454  (219)

Total

 $28,468 $(192)$31,504 $(376)$59,972 $(568)


Less Than 12 Months12 Months or LongerTotal
At December 31, 2021Fair
Value
Unrealized
Losses
Fair
Value
Unrealized
Losses
Fair
Value
Unrealized
Losses
Securities of U.S. government and federal agencies$13,275 $(283)$— $— $13,275 $(283)
Securities of state and local municipalities taxable595 (11)— — 595 (11)
Corporate bonds3,922 (78)— — 3,922 (78)
Mortgage-backed securities216,278��(3,175)19,225 (652)235,503 (3,827)
Collateralized mortgage obligations3,362 (82)1,814 (67)5,176 (149)
Total$237,432 $(3,629)$21,039 $(719)$258,471 $(4,348)
 
 Less Than 12 Months 12 Months or Longer Total 
At December 31, 2018
 Fair
Value
 Unrealized
Losses
 Fair
Value
 Unrealized
Losses
 Fair
Value
 Unrealized
Losses
 

Securities of U.S. government and federal agencies

 $ $ $2,433 $(64)$2,433 $(64)

Securities of state and local municipalities tax exempt

  263  (1) 3,634  (44) 3,897  (45)

Securities of state and local municipalities taxable

  757  (1) 1,551  (69) 2,308  (70)

Corporate bonds

  988  (12) 933  (67) 1,921  (79)

Certificates of deposit

      244  (1) 244  (1)

SBA pass-through securities

      195  (5) 195  (5)

Mortgage-backed securities

  12,743  (59) 60,656  (2,232) 73,399  (2,291)

Collateralized mortgage obligations

      16,790  (810) 16,790  (810)

Total

 $14,751 $(73)$86,436 $(3,292)$101,187 $(3,365)

Securities of U.S. government and federal agencies:The unrealized losses on twothree available-for-sale securitysecurities were caused by interest rate increases. The contractual terms of these investments do not permit the issuer to settle the securities at a price less than the amortized cost basis of the investments.


Table of Contents


Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(Dollars in thousands, except share and per share data)

Note 4. Investment Securities and Other Investments (Continued)

Securities of state and local municipalities tax exempt:tax-exempt: The unrealized losses on three of the investments in securities of state and local municipalities were caused by interest rate increases. The contractual terms of those investments do not permit the issuer to settle the securities at a price less than the amortized cost basis of the investments. Three of the sevenThese investments carry an S&P investment grade rating of AA+ or above,and AA.

Securities of state and local municipalities taxable: The unrealized loss on one hasof the investment in securities of state and local municipalities were caused by interest rate increases. The contractual terms of those investments do not permit the issuer to settle the securities at a price less than the amortized cost basis of the investments. The investment carries an S&P investment grade rating of AA–, one has an AA rating, while the remaining two do not carry a rating.

AAA.

Corporate bonds:The unrealized losses on the Company's investments inon fifteen corporate bonds were caused by interest rate increases. The contractual terms of those investments do not permit the issuer to settle the securities at a price less than the amortized cost basis of the investments. OneTwo of these investments carriescarry an S&P investment grade rating of A-.BBB and BBB+. The remaining sixthirteen investments doesdo not carry a rating.

SBA pass-through securities: The unrealized losslosses on the Company's single investment in SBA pass-through securitiesone available-for-sale security was caused by interest rate increases. RepaymentThe contractual terms of these investments do not permit the principal on this investment is guaranteed by an agency ofissuer to settle the U.S. Government. Accordingly, it is expected that the security would not be settledsecurities at a price less than the amortized cost basis of the Company's investment. Because the declineinvestments.
81

Table of Contents
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(Dollars in market value is attributable to changes in interest rates and not credit quality, the Company does not consider the investment to be other-than-temporarily impaired at December 31, 2019.

thousands, except per share data)

Mortgage-backed securities: The unrealized losses on the Company's investment in thirtyone hundred and six mortgage-backed securities were caused by interest rate increases. The contractual cash flows of those investments are guaranteed by an agency of the U.S. Government. Accordingly, it is expected that the securities would not be settled at a price less than the amortized cost basis of the Company's investments. Because the decline in market value is attributable to changes in interest rates and not credit quality, the Company does not consider those investments to be other-than-temporarily impaired at December 31, 2019.

2022.

Collateralized mortgage obligations (CMOs)("CMOs"): The unrealized loss associated with twenty-sixtwenty-nine CMOs was caused by interest rate increases. The contractual cash flows of these investments are guaranteed by an agency of the U.S. Government. Accordingly, it is expected that the securities would not be settled at a price less than the amortized cost basis of the Company's investments. Because the decline in market value is attributable to changes in interest rates and not credit quality, the Company does not consider those investments to be other-than-temporarily impaired at December 31, 2019.

2022.

Table of Contents


Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(Dollars in thousands, except share and per share data)

Note 4. Investment Securities and Other Investments (Continued)

The amortized cost and fair value of securities held-to-maturity and available-for-sale as of December 31, 2019,2022, by contractual maturity, are shown below. Expected maturities may differ from contractual maturities because issuers may have the right to call or prepay obligations without penalties.

2022
Held-to-maturityAvailable-for-sale
Amortized
Cost
Fair
Value
Amortized
Cost
Fair
Value
After 1 year through 5 years$264 $252 $4,935 $4,776 
After 5 years through 10 years— — 48,978 43,396 
After 10 years— — 275,679 229,897 
   Total$264 $252 $329,592 $278,069 
 
 2019 
 
 Held-to-maturity Available-for-sale 
 
 Amortized
Cost
 Fair
Value
 Amortized
Cost
 Fair
Value
 

After 1 year through 5 years

 $ $ $2,028 $2,061 

After 5 years through 10 years

  264  270  25,527  25,658 

After 10 years

      112,817  113,606 

Total

 $264 $270 $140,372 $141,325 

For the years ended December 31, 20192022 and 2018,2021, proceeds from maturities, calls, and principal repayments of securities were $24.1$37.1 million and $16.9$48.0 million, respectively. During 2019No securities were sold during 2022 and 2018, proceeds from sales of securities amounted to $3.0 million and $23.0 million, gross realized gains of $3 thousand in 2019 and gross realized losses of $462 thousand in 2018.2021. There were no realized gains or losses in 20192022 and no realized gains in 2018.

2021, respectively.

The Company has other investments in the form of restricted stock totaling $6.0$15.6 million and $5.3$6.4 million at December 31, 20192022 and 2018,2021, respectively. The following table discloses the types of investments included in other investments:

20222021
Federal Reserve stock$4,378 $4,378 
FHLB stock11,087 1,847 
Community Bankers' Bank stock122 122 
Atlantic Bankers' Bank stock25 25 
   Total$15,612 $6,372 
 
 2019 2018 

Federal Reserve stock

 $4,018 $4,029 

FHLB stock

  1,852  1,123 

Community Bankers' Bank stock

  122  122 

Atlantic Bankers' Bank stock

  25  25 

 $6,017 $5,299 

As membersa member of the Federal Reserve BankFRB and the FHLB, the Company's banking subsidiaryBank is required to hold stock in these entities. Stock membership in Community Bankers' Bank allows the Company to secure overnight funding.funding and participate in other services offered by this institution. These investments are carried at cost since no active trading markets exist.


82


Table of Contents


Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(Dollars in thousands, except share and per share data)

Note 5.4. Loans and Allowance for Loan Losses

A summary of loan balances by type follows:

20222021
OriginatedAcquiredTotalOriginatedAcquiredTotal
Commercial real estate$1,085,513 $14,748 $1,100,261 $887,310 $18,802 $906,112 
Commercial and industrial242,307 2,913 245,220 199,040 3,710 202,750 
Commercial construction147,436 503 147,939 186,572 1,043 187,615 
Consumer real estate322,579 17,012 339,591 176,682 23,922 200,604 
Consumer nonresidential7,661 24 7,685 10,277 27 10,304 
$1,805,496 $35,200 $1,840,696 $1,459,881 $47,504 $1,507,385 
Less:
Allowance for loan losses16,040 — 16,040 13,829 — 13,829 
Unearned income and (unamortized premiums), net262 — 262 3,536 — 3,536 
Loans, net$1,789,194 $35,200 $1,824,394 $1,442,516 $47,504 $1,490,020 
 
 2019 2018 
 
 Originated Acquired Total Originated Acquired Total 

Commercial real estate

 $771,320 $50,372 $821,692 $616,614 $66,988 $683,602 

Commercial and industrial

  107,698  7,405  115,103  128,909  8,419  137,328 

Commercial construction

  210,933  5,050  215,983  141,694  11,645  153,339 

Consumer residential

  74,488  34,307  108,795  87,609  43,822  131,431 

Consumer nonresidential

  11,205  85  11,290  32,184  124  32,308 

 $1,175,644 $97,219 $1,272,863 $1,007,010 $130,998 $1,138,008 

Less:

  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
 

Allowance for loan losses

  10,202  29  10,231  9,159    9,159 

Unearned income and (unamortized premiums), net

  2,337    2,337  1,265    1,265 

Loans, net

 $1,163,105 $97,190 $1,260,295 $996,586 $130,998 $1,127,584 

During 2018, as a result of the Company's acquisition of Colombo, the loan portfolio was segregated between loans initially accounted for under the amortized cost method (referred to as "originated" loans) and loans acquired (referred to as "acquired" loans).

The loans segregated to the acquired loan portfolio were initially measured at fair value and subsequently accounted for under either ASC Topic 310-30 or ASC 310-20. The outstanding principal balance and related carrying amount of acquired loans included in the consolidated statement of condition as of December 31, 20192022 and 20182021 are as follows:

2022
Purchased credit impaired acquired loans evaluated individually for future credit losses
Outstanding principal balance$24 
Carrying amount— 
Other acquired loans
Outstanding principal balance35,604 
Carrying amount35,200 
Total acquired loans
Outstanding principal balance35,628 
Carrying amount35,200 
2021
Purchased credit impaired acquired loans evaluated individually for future credit losses
Outstanding principal balance$207 
Carrying amount— 
Other acquired loans
Outstanding principal balance48,049 
Carrying amount47,504 
Total acquired loans
Outstanding principal balance48,256 
Carrying amount47,504 
83

 
 2019 

Purchased credit impaired acquired loans evaluated individually for future credit losses

    

Outstanding principal balance

 $5,605 

Carrying amount

  4,810 

Other acquired loans

  
 
 

Outstanding principal balance

  93,587 

Carrying amount

  92,409 

Total acquired loans

  
 
 

Outstanding principal balance

  99,192 

Carrying amount

  97,219 

Table of Contents


Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(Dollars in thousands, except share and per share data)

Note 5. Loans and Allowance for Loan Losses (Continued)


 
 2018 

Purchased credit impaired acquired loans evaluated individually for future credit losses

    

Outstanding principal balance

 $5,896 

Carrying amount

  4,649 

Other acquired loans

  
 
 

Outstanding principal balance

  131,286 

Carrying amount

  129,597 

Total acquired loans

  
 
 

Outstanding principal balance

  137,182 

Carrying amount

  134,246 

The following table presents changes for the year ended December 31, 20192022 and 20182021 in the accretable yield on purchased credit impaired loans for which the Company applies ASC 310-30.

Balance at January 1, 2022$
Accretion(197)
Reclassification of nonaccretable difference due to improvement in expected cash flows33 
Other changes, net161 
Balance at December 31, 2022$— 
Balance at January 1, 2021$216 
Accretion(217)
Reclassification of nonaccretable difference due to improvement in expected cash flows54 
Other changes, net(50)
Balance at December 31, 2021$

Balance at January 1, 2019

 $357 

Accretion

  (136)

Reclassification of nonaccretable difference due to improvement in expected cash flows

  78 

Other changes, net

  72 

Balance at December 31, 2019

 $371 

Balance at January 1, 2018

 $ 

Accretable yield at acquisition date

  379 

Accretion

  (22)

Balance at December 31, 2018

 $357 

An analysis of the allowance for loan losses for the years ended December 31, 20192022 and 20182021 follows:

Commercial
Real Estate
Commercial and
Industrial
Commercial
Construction
Consumer Real
Estate
Consumer
Nonresidential
Total
2022
Allowance for loan losses:
Beginning Balance$8,995 $1,827 $2,009 $781 $217 $13,829 
Charge-offs— (396)— — (101)(497)
Recoveries— — — 78 79 
Provision (reversal)1,782 1,192 (510)262 (97)2,629 
Ending Balance$10,777 $2,623 $1,499 $1,044 $97 $16,040 
Commercial
Real Estate
Commercial and
Industrial
Commercial
Construction
Consumer Real
Estate
Consumer
Nonresidential
Total
2021
Allowance for loan losses:
Beginning Balance$9,291 $2,546 $1,960 $690 $471 $14,958 
Charge-offs(477)(117)— — (255)(849)
Recoveries24 — — 35 161 220 
Provision (reversal)157 (602)49 56 (160)(500)
Ending Balance$8,995 $1,827 $2,009 $781 $217 $13,829 
84

 
 Commercial
Real Estate
 Commercial
and
Industrial
 Commercial
Construction
 Consumer
Residential
 Consumer
Nonresidential
 Total 

2019

                   

Allowance for loan losses:

                   

Beginning Balance

 $5,548 $1,474 $1,285 $518 $334 $9,159 

Charge-offs

  (20)       (692) (712)

Recoveries

  4  35    2  23  64 

Provision

  867  (234) 782  (103) 408  1,720 

Ending Balance

 $6,399 $1,275 $2,067 $417 $73 $10,231 

Table of Contents


Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(Dollars in thousands, except share and per share data)

Note 5. Loans and Allowance for Loan Losses (Continued)


 
 Commercial
Real Estate
 Commercial
and
Industrial
 Commercial
Construction
 Consumer
Residential
 Consumer
Nonresidential
 Unallocated Total 

2018

                      

Allowance for loan losses:

                      

Beginning Balance

 $4,832 $768 $1,191 $626 $268 $40 $7,725 

Charge-offs

    (86)   (187) (292)   (565)

Recoveries

    26    1  52    79 

Provision

  716  766  94  78  306  (40) 1,920 

Ending Balance

 $5,548 $1,474 $1,285 $518 $334 $ $9,159 

The following table presents the recorded investment in loans and impairment method as of December 31, 20192022 and 2018,2021, by portfolio segment:


Allowance for Loan Losses

Allowance for Loan Losses
Commercial
Real Estate
Commercial
and Industrial
Commercial
Construction
Consumer
Real Estate
Consumer
Nonresidential
Total
2022
Allowance for loan losses:
Ending Balance:
Individually evaluated for impairment$— $86 $— $— $— $86 
Purchased credit impaired— — — — — — 
Collectively evaluated for impairment10,777 2,537 1,499 1,044 97 15,954 
$10,777 $2,623 $1,499 $1,044 $97 $16,040 
Loans Receivable
Commercial
Real Estate
Commercial
and Industrial
Commercial
Construction
Consumer
Real Estate
Consumer
Nonresidential
Total
2022
Financing receivables:      
Ending Balance      
Individually evaluated for impairment$1,703 $1,319 $— $1,041 $— $4,063 
Purchased credit impaired loans— — — — — — 
Collectively evaluated for impairment1,098,558 243,901 147,939 338,550 7,685 1,836,633 
$1,100,261 $245,220 $147,939 $339,591 $7,685 $1,840,696 
85
 
 Commercial
Real Estate
 Commercial
and
Industrial
 Commercial
Construction
 Consumer
Residential
 Consumer
Nonresidential
 Total 

2019

                   

Allowance for loan losses:

                   

Ending Balance:

                   

Individually evaluated for impairment

 $ $364 $ $29 $ $393 

Purchased credit impaired

             

Collectively evaluated for impairment

  6,399  911  2,067  388  73  9,838 

 $6,399 $1,275 $2,067 $417 $73 $10,231 


Loans Receivable


 
 Commercial
Real Estate
 Commercial
and
Industrial
 Commercial
Construction
 Consumer
Residential
 Consumer
Nonresidential
 Total 

2019

                   

Financing receivables:

                   

Ending Balance

                   

Individually evaluated for impairment

 $13,902 $5,208 $820 $320 $ $20,250 

Purchased credit impaired loans

  4,043  400    367    4,810 

Collectively evaluated for impairment

  803,747  109,495  215,163  108,108  11,290  1,247,803 

 $821,692 $115,103 $215,983 $108,795 $11,290 $1,272,863 

Table of Contents


Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(Dollars in thousands, except share and per share data)

Note 5. Loans and Allowance for Loan Losses (Continued)


Allowance for Loan Losses

 
 Commercial
Real Estate
 Commercial
and
Industrial
 Commercial
Construction
 Consumer
Residential
 Consumer
Nonresidential
 Total 

2018

                   

Allowance for loan losses:

                   

Ending Balance:

                   

Individually evaluated for impairment

 $ $372 $ $1 $ $373 

Collectively evaluated for impairment

  5,548  1,102  1,285  517  334  8,786 

 $5,548 $1,474 $1,285 $518 $334 $9,159 


Loans Receivable

Allowance for Loan Losses
Commercial
Real Estate
 Commercial
and Industrial
 Commercial
Construction
 Consumer
Real Estate
 Consumer
Nonresidential
 Total
2021
Allowance for loan losses:
Ending Balance:
Individually evaluated for impairment$— $181 $— $$— $186 
Purchased credit impaired loans— — — — — — 
Collectively evaluated for impairment8,995 1,646 2,009 776 217 13,643 
$8,995 $1,827 $2,009 $781 $217 $13,829 
Loans Receivable
Commercial
Real Estate
 Commercial
and Industrial
 Commercial
Construction
 Consumer
Real Estate
 Consumer
Nonresidential
 Total
2021
Financing receivables:      
Ending Balance      
Individually evaluated for impairment$11,915 $5,214 $1,557 $343 $— $19,029 
Purchased credit impaired loans— — — — — — 
Collectively evaluated for impairment894,197 197,536 186,058 200,261 10,304 1,488,356 
$906,112 $202,750 $187,615 $200,604 $10,304 $1,507,385 
 
 Commercial
Real Estate
 Commercial
and
Industrial
 Commercial
Construction
 Consumer
Residential
 Consumer
Nonresidential
 Total 

2018

                   

Financing receivables:

                   

Ending Balance

                   

Individually evaluated for impairment

 $1,306 $2,969 $ $182 $ $4,457 

Purchased credit impaired loans

  139  467  421  374    1,401 

Collectively evaluated for impairment

  682,157  133,892  152,918  130,875  32,308  1,132,150 

 $683,602 $137,328 $153,339 $131,431 $32,308 $1,138,008 

Table of Contents


Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(Dollars in thousands, except share and per share data)

Note 5. Loans and Allowance for Loan Losses (Continued)

Impaired loans by class excluding purchased credit impaired, as of December 31, 20192022 and 20182021 are summarized as follows:


Impaired Loans—Loans – Originated Loan Portfolio

Recorded
Investment
Unpaid
Principal
Balance
Related
Allowance
Average
Recorded
Investment
Interest
Income
Recognized
2022
With an allowance recorded:
Commercial real estate$— $— $— $— $— 
Commercial and industrial1,319 1,329 86 1,604 107 
Commercial construction— — — — — 
Consumer real estate— — — — — 
Consumer nonresidential— — — — — 
$1,319 $1,329 $86 $1,604 $107 
2022
With no related allowance:
Commercial real estate$1,703 $1,703 $— $1,704 $135 
Commercial and industrial— — — — — 
Commercial construction— — — — — 
Consumer real estate1,041 1,044 — 1,048 34 
Consumer nonresidential— — — — — 
$2,744 $2,747 $— $2,752 $169 
86
 
 Recorded
Investment
 Unpaid
Principal
Balance
 Related
Allowance
 Average
Recorded
Investment
 Interest
Income
Recognized
 

2019

                

With an allowance recorded:

                

Commercial real estate

 $ $ $ $ $ 

Commercial and industrial

  2,040  2,040  364  2,081  157 

Commercial construction

           

Consumer residential

           

Consumer nonresidential

           

 $2,040 $2,040  364 $2,081 $157 

2019

                

With no related allowance:

                

Commercial real estate

 $13,732 $13,736 $ $14,557 $699 

Commercial and industrial

  3,168  3,323    5,387  340 

Commercial construction

  820  820    816  56 

Consumer residential

           

Consumer nonresidential

           

 $17,720 $17,879 $ $20,760 $1,095 


Impaired Loans—Acquired Loan Portfolio


 
 Recorded
Investment
 Unpaid
Principal
Balance
 Related
Allowance
 Average
Recorded
Investment
 Interest
Income
Recognized
 

2019

                

With an allowance recorded:

                

Commercial real estate

 $ $ $ $ $ 

Commercial and industrial

           

Commercial construction

           

Consumer residential

  169  163  29  163  10 

Consumer nonresidential

           

 $169 $163  29 $163 $10 

2019

                

With no related allowance:

                

Commercial real estate

 $170 $165 $ $165 $13 

Commercial and industrial

           

Commercial construction

           

Consumer residential

  151  152    155  8 

Consumer nonresidential

           

 $321 $317 $ $320 $21 

Table of Contents


Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(Dollars in thousands, except share and per share data)

Note 5.


Impaired Loans and Allowance for Loan Losses (Continued)


Impaired Loans—Originated Loan Portfolio

Recorded
Investment
Unpaid
Principal
Balance
Related
Allowance
Average
Recorded
Investment
Interest
Income
Recognized
2021
With an allowance recorded:
Commercial real estate$— $— $— $— $— 
Commercial and industrial1,678 1,688 181 1,711 95 
Commercial construction— — — — — 
Consumer real estate93 93 95 
Consumer nonresidential— — — — — 
$1,771 $1,781 $186 $1,806 $102 
2021
With no related allowance:     
Commercial real estate$11,915 $11,915 $— $11,947 $581 
Commercial and industrial3,536 3,536 — 3,660 238 
Commercial construction1,557 1,596 — 1,597 174 
Consumer real estate250 250 — 250 28 
Consumer nonresidential— — — — — 
$17,258 $17,297 $— $17,454 $1,021 
 
 Recorded
Investment
 Unpaid
Principal
Balance
 Related
Allowance
 Average
Recorded
Investment
 Interest
Income
Recognized
 

2018

                

With an allowance recorded:

                

Commercial real estate

 $ $ $ $ $ 

Commercial and industrial

  1,793  1,793  372  1,801  100 

Commercial construction

           

Consumer residential

  182  182  1  184  12 

Consumer nonresidential

           

 $1,975 $1,975 $373 $1,985 $112 

2018

                

With no related allowance:

                

Commercial real estate

 $1,306 $1,319 $ $1,321 $68 

Commercial and industrial

  1,156  1,170    1,378  81 

Commercial construction

           

Consumer residential

           

Consumer nonresidential

           

 $2,462 $2,489 $ $2,699 $149 


Impaired Loans—Acquired Loan Portfolio


There were no impaired loans in the acquired loan portfolio as of December 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively.
 
 Recorded
Investment
 Unpaid
Principal
Balance
 Related
Allowance
 Average
Recorded
Investment
 Interest
Income
Recognized
 

2018

                

With an allowance recorded:

                

Commercial real estate

 $ $ $ $ $ 

Commercial and industrial

           

Commercial construction

           

Consumer residential

           

Consumer nonresidential

           

 $ $ $ $ $ 

2018

                

With no related allowance:

                

Commercial real estate

 $ $ $ $ $ 

Commercial and industrial

  20  20    58  3 

Commercial construction

           

Consumer residential

           

Consumer nonresidential

           

 $20 $20 $ $58 $3 

No additional funds are committed to be advanced in connection with the impaired loans. There were no nonaccrual loans excluded from the impaired loan disclosure.


Table of Contents


Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(Dollars in thousands, except share and per share data)

Note 5. Loans and Allowance for Loan Losses (Continued)

The Company categorizes loans into risk categories based on relevant information about the ability of borrowers to service their debt such as current financial information, historical payment experience, collateral adequacy, credit documentation, and current economic trends, among other factors. The Company analyzes loans individually by classifying the loans as to credit risk. This analysis typically includes larger, non-homogeneous loans such as commercial real estate and commercial and industrial loans. This analysis is performed on an ongoing basis as new information is obtained. The Company uses the following definitions for risk ratings:

PassLoans listed as pass include larger non-homogeneous loans not meeting the risk rating definitions below and smaller, homogeneous loans not assessed on an individual basis.

Special MentionLoans classified as special mention have a potential weakness that deserves management's close attention. If left uncorrected, these potential weaknesses may result in deterioration of the repayment prospects for the loan or of the institution's credit position at some future date.

SubstandardLoans classified as substandard are inadequately protected by the current net worth and paying capacity of the obligor or of the collateral pledged, if any. Loans so classified have a well-defined weakness or weaknesses that jeopardize the liquidation of the debt. They are characterized by the enhanced possibility that the institution will sustain some loss if the deficiencies are not corrected.

DoubtfulLoans classified as doubtful include those loans which have all the weaknesses inherent in those classified Substandard with the added characteristic that the weaknesses make collection or liquidation in full, based on currently known facts, conditions and values, improbable.

87

Table of Contents
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
LossLoans classified as loss include those loans which are considered uncollectible and of such little value that their continuance as loans is not warranted. Even though partial recovery may be achieved in the future, it is neither practical nor desirable to defer writing off these loans.

Based on the most recent analysis performed, the risk category of loans by class of loans was as follows as of December 31, 20192022 and 2018:

2019—2021:

2022 – Originated Loan Portfolio

Commercial Real
Estate
Commercial and
Industrial
Commercial
Construction
Consumer Real
Estate
Consumer
Nonresidential
Total
Grade:
Pass$1,077,526 $237,638 $147,436 $320,735 $7,661 $1,790,996 
Special mention6,284 3,350 — 803 — 10,437 
Substandard1,703 1,319 — 1,041 — 4,063 
Doubtful— — — — — — 
Loss— — — — — — 
Total$1,085,513 $242,307 $147,436 $322,579 $7,661 $1,805,496 
2022 – Acquired Loan Portfolio
Commercial Real
Estate
Commercial and
Industrial
Commercial
Construction
Consumer Real
Estate
Consumer
Nonresidential
Total
Grade:
Pass$14,748 $2,913 $503 $17,012 $24 $35,200 
Special mention— — — — — — 
Substandard— — — — — — 
Doubtful— — — — — — 
Loss— — — — — — 
Total$14,748 $2,913 $503 $17,012 $24 $35,200 
2021 – Originated Loan Portfolio
Commercial Real
Estate
Commercial and
Industrial
Commercial
Construction
Consumer Real
Estate
Consumer
Nonresidential
Total
Grade:
Pass$875,395 $193,426 $182,497 $176,271 $10,277 $1,437,866 
Special mention— 400 2,518 68 — 2,986 
Substandard11,915 5,214 1,557 343 — 19,029 
Doubtful— — — — — — 
Loss— — — — — — 
Total$887,310 $199,040 $186,572 $176,682 $10,277 $1,459,881 
2021 – Acquired Loan Portfolio
Commercial Real
Estate
Commercial and
Industrial
Commercial
Construction
Consumer Real
Estate
Consumer
Nonresidential
Total
Grade:
Pass$18,802 $3,710 $1,043 $23,922 $27 $47,504 
Special mention— — — — — — 
Substandard— — — — — — 
Doubtful— — — — — — 
Loss— — — — — — 
Total$18,802 $3,710 $1,043 $23,922 $27 $47,504 
88

 
 Commercial
Real Estate
 Commercial
and
Industrial
 Commercial
Construction
 Consumer
Residential
 Consumer
Nonresidential
 Total 

Grade:

                   

Pass

 $751,161 $102,491 $210,113 $73,834 $11,186 $1,148,785 

Special mention

  15,967  476    553  19  17,015 

Substandard

  4,192  4,731  820  101    9,844 

Doubtful

             

Loss

             

Total

 $771,320 $107,698 $210,933 $74,488 $11,205 $1,175,644 

Table of Contents


Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(Dollars in thousands, except share and per share data)

Note 5. Loans

There were no impaired loans in the acquired loan portfolio at both December 31, 2022 and Allowance for Loan Losses (Continued)

2019—Acquired Loan Portfolio

December 31, 2021. No additional funds are committed to be advanced in connection with the impaired loans. There were no nonaccrual loans excluded from the impairment loan disclosure.
 
 Commercial
Real Estate
 Commercial
and
Industrial
 Commercial
Construction
 Consumer
Residential
 Consumer
Nonresidential
 Total 

Grade:

                   

Pass

 $47,027 $7,005 $5,050 $33,622 $85 $92,789 

Special mention

  3,089      139    3,228 

Substandard

  256  400    546    1,202 

Doubtful

             

Loss

             

Total

 $50,372 $7,405 $5,050 $34,307 $85 $97,219 

2018—Originated Loan Portfolio

 
 Commercial
Real Estate
 Commercial
and
Industrial
 Commercial
Construction
 Consumer
Residential
 Consumer
Nonresidential
 Total 

Grade:

                   

Pass

 $610,580 $124,349 $141,694 $86,848 $32,184 $995,655 

Special mention

  6,034  1,783    761    8,578 

Substandard

    2,777        2,777 

Doubtful

             

Loss

             

Total

 $616,614 $128,909 $141,694 $87,609 $32,184 $1,007,010 

2018—Acquired Loan Portfolio

 
 Commercial
Real Estate
 Commercial
and
Industrial
 Commercial
Construction
 Consumer
Residential
 Consumer
Nonresidential
 Total 

Grade:

                   

Pass

 $66,849 $7,952 $11,224 $43,811 $124 $129,960 

Special mention

  56    421      477 

Substandard

  83  467    11    561 

Doubtful

             

Loss

             

Total

 $66,988 $8,419 $11,645 $43,822 $124 $130,998 

The Company categorizes loans into risk categories based on relevant information about the ability of borrowers to service their debt such as current financial information, historical payment experience, collateral adequacy, credit documentation, and current economic trends, among other factors. The Company analyzes loans individually by classifying the loans as to credit risk. This analysis includes larger, non-homogeneous loans such as commercial real estate and commercial and industrial loans. This analysis is performed on an ongoing basis as new information is obtained. At December 31, 2019,


Table of Contents


Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(Dollars in thousands, except share and per share data)

Note 5. Loans and Allowance for Loan Losses (Continued)

2022, the Company had $17.0$10.4 million in loans identified as special mention within the originated loan portfolio, an increase of $8.4$7.5 million from December 31, 2018.2021. Special mention rated loans are loans that have a potential weakness that deservedeserves management's close attention. The increase from December 31, 2018 is concentratedattention; however, the borrower continues to pay in three loans that were added to this risk category during the second quarter of 2019 and one loan that was added to this risk category during the fourth quarter of 2019.accordance with their contract. These loans do not have a specific reserve and are considered well-secured.

At December 31, 2019,2022, the Company had $9.8$4.1 million in loans identified as substandard within the originated loan portfolio, an increasea decrease of $7.1$15.0 million from December 31, 2018.2021. Substandard rated loans are loans that are inadequately protected by the current net worth and paying capacity of the obligor or of the collateral pledged, if any. For each of these substandard loans, a liquidation analysis is completed. As of December 31, 2019,2022, specific reserves on originated and acquired loans totaling $393 thousand,$0.1 million, has been allocated within the allowance for loan losses to supplement any shortfall of collateral.

Past due and nonaccrual loans presented by loan class were as follows as of December 31, 20192022 and 2018:

2019—2021:

2022 – Originated Loan Portfolio

30-59 days past
due
60-89 days past
due
90 days or more
past due
Total past dueCurrentTotal loans90 days past due
and still accruing
Nonaccruals
Commercial real estate$546 $— $2,096 $2,642 $1,082,871 $1,085,513 $393 $1,703 
Commercial and industrial512 — 1,319 1,831 240,476 242,307 — 1,319 
Commercial construction— — 125 125 147,311 147,436 125 — 
Consumer real estate805 — 953 1,758 320,821 322,579 825 128 
Consumer nonresidential— 63 — 63 7,598 7,661 — — 
Total$1,863 $63 $4,493 $6,419 $1,799,077 $1,805,496 $1,343 $3,150 
 
 30 - 59 days
past due
 60 - 89 days
past due
 90 days
or more
past due
 Total
past due
 Current Total loans 90 days
past due
and still
accruing
 Nonaccruals 

Commercial real estate

 $8,550 $ $753 $9,303 $762,017 $771,320 $753 $3,903 

Commercial and industrial

  1,184    48  1,232  106,466  107,698  48  3,822 

Commercial construction

  2,000      2,000  208,933  210,933    820 

Consumer residential

  289  153  101  543  73,945  74,488  101   

Consumer nonresidential

  77  56  12  145  11,060  11,205  12   

Total

 $12,100 $209 $914 $13,223 $1,162,421 $1,175,644 $914 $8,545 

2019—2022 – Acquired Loan Portfolio

30-59 days past
due
60-89 days past
due
90 days or more
past due
Total past dueCurrentTotal loans90 days past due
and still accruing
Nonaccruals
Commercial real estate$— $— $— $— $14,748 $14,748 $— $— 
Commercial and industrial— — — — 2,913 2,913 — — 
Commercial construction— — — — 503 503 — — 
Consumer real estate— — — — 17,012 17,012 — — 
Consumer nonresidential— — — — 24 24 — — 
Total$— $— $— $— $35,200 $35,200 $— $— 
89

 
 30 - 59 days
past due
 60 - 89 days
past due
 90 days
or more
past due
 Total
past due
 Current Total loans 90 days
past due
and still
accruing
 Nonaccruals 

Commercial real estate

 $ $ $ $ $50,372 $50,372 $ $256 

Commercial and industrial

          7,405  7,405    272 

Commercial construction

          5,050  5,050     

Consumer residential

  1,138  241  118  1,497  32,810  34,307  118  620 

Consumer nonresidential

          85  85     

Total

 $1,138 $241 $118 $1,497 $95,722 $97,219 $118 $1,148 

Table of Contents


Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(Dollars in thousands, except share and per share data)

Note 5. Loans and Allowance for Loan Losses (Continued)

2018—

2021 – Originated Loan Portfolio

30-59 days past
due
60-89 days past
due
90 days or more
past due
Total past dueCurrentTotal loans90 days past due
and still accruing
Nonaccruals
Commercial real estate$— $— $— $— $887,310 $887,310 $— $— 
Commercial and industrial— — 1,678 1,678 197,362 199,040 — 1,678 
Commercial construction— — 1,557 1,557 185,015 186,572 — 1,557 
Consumer real estate— — 250 250 176,432 176,682 — 250 
Consumer nonresidential14 21 18 53 10,224 10,277 18 — 
Total$14 $21 $3,503 $3,538 $1,456,343 $1,459,881 $18 $3,485 
 
 30 - 59 days
past due
 60 - 89 days
past due
 90 days
or more
past due
 Total
past due
 Current Total loans 90 days
past due
and still
accruing
 Nonaccruals 

Commercial real estate

 $3,062 $2,148 $ $5,210 $611,404 $616,614 $ $ 

Commercial and industrial

  68  181  2,701  2,950  125,959  128,909  1,031  1,769 

Commercial construction

          141,694  141,694     

Consumer residential

  843  345    1,188  86,421  87,609    182 

Consumer nonresidential

  111  44    155  32,029  32,184     

Total

 $4,084 $2,718 $2,701 $9,503 $997,507 $1,007,010 $1,031 $1,951 

2018—2021 – Acquired Loan Portfolio

30-59 days past
due
60-89 days past
due
90 days or more
past due
Total past dueCurrentTotal loans90 days past due
and still accruing
Nonaccruals
Commercial real estate$— $— $— $— $18,802 $18,802 $— $— 
Commercial and industrial— — — — 3,710 3,710 — — 
Commercial construction— — — — 1,043 1,043 — — 
Consumer real estate234 — 239 23,683 23,922 — 
Consumer nonresidential— — 25 27 — — 
Total$236 $— $$241 $47,263 $47,504 $$— 
 
 30 - 59 days
past due
 60 - 89 days
past due
 90 days
or more
past due
 Total
past due
 Current Total loans 90 days
past due
and still
accruing
 Nonaccruals 

Commercial real estate

 $1,001 $83 $56 $1,140 $65,848 $66,988 $ $56 

Commercial and industrial

  446      446  7,973  8,419     

Commercial construction

  186      186  11,459  11,645     

Consumer residential

  2,785  612  173  3,570  40,252  43,822    173 

Consumer nonresidential

          124  124     

Total

 $4,418 $695 $229 $5,342 $125,656 $130,998 $ $229 

There were overdrafts of $181 thousand$1.3 million and $28$58 thousand at December 31, 20192022 and 20182021, respectively, which have been reclassified from deposits to loans. At December 31, 20192022 and 2018,2021, loans with a carrying value of $154.0$458.7 million and $173.0$290.3 million were pledged to the Federal Home Loan Bank of Atlanta.

        There was a default of one troubled debt restructuring (TDR) during the twelve months of restructuring during the year ended December 31, 2019. FHLB.

There were no defaults of TDRs where the default occurred within twelve months of the restructuring during the yearyears ended December 31, 2018.

2022 and December 31, 2021.

The following table presents the TDRs originated during the year ended December 31, 2019:

At2022:

Troubled Debt Restructurings
Number of
Contracts
Pre-Modification
Outstanding
Recorded
Investment
Post-Modification
Outstanding
Recorded
Investment
Commercial real estate1$742 $742 
Total1$742 $742 
No TDRs were originated during the year ended December 31, 2019

2021.
Troubled Debt Restructurings
 Number of
Contracts
 Pre-Modification
Outstanding
Recorded
Investment
 Post-Modification
Outstanding
Recorded
Investment
 

Commercial real estate

  1 $3,903 $3,903 

Total

  1 $3,903 $3,903 

        There were no TDR's originated in 2018.

        AsFor each of December 31, 20192022 and 2018,2021, the Company hashad a recorded investment in troubled debt restructuringsTDRs of $3.9 million$830 thousand and $203$92 thousand, respectively.

The concessions made in troubled debt restructuringsTDRs were extensions of the maturity dates or reductions in the stated interest rate for the remaining life of the debt.


90


Table of Contents


Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(Dollars in thousands, except share and per share data)

Note 6.5. Other Real Estate Owned

        Other real estate owned activity was as follows for

The Company had no OREO property at December 31, 20192022 and 2018.

 
 2019 

Beginning Balance

 $4,224 

Sales of other real estate owned

  (358)

Ending Balance

 $3,866 


 
 2018 

Beginning Balance

 $3,866 

Other real estate acquired in acquisition

  358 

Ending Balance

 $4,224 

December 31, 2021. There was no OREO activity during 2022 and $3.9 million was sold during 2021 where the Company recognized a gain on sale of OREO of $236 thousand. There were no foreclosed residential real estate properties recorded in other real estate ownedOREO as a result of obtaining physical possession of the property at December 31, 2019. At December 31, 2018, there was one foreclosed residential real estate property recorded in other real estate owned which was acquired by the Company upon its acquisition of Colombo. At December 31, 2019, there was $177 thousand of2022 and 2021. There were no consumer mortgage loans secured by residential real estate properties for which formal foreclosure proceedings are in process. Atprocess as of December 31, 2018, there was no residential real estate properties for which formal foreclosure proceedings are in process.2022 and 2021. The Company recorded no impairment charges during 20192022 and 2018.

2021.

Note 7.6. Goodwill and Intangibles

As a result of the Company's acquisition of Colombo in October 2018,past acquisitions, the Company recognized goodwill and core deposit intangibles.

Information concerning amortizable intangibles follows:

Acquisition of 1st CommonwealthAcquisition of Colombo BankTotal
Gross Carrying
Amount
Accumulated
Amortization
Gross Carrying
Amount
Accumulated
Amortization
Gross Carrying
Amount
Accumulated
Amortization
Balance at December 31, 2020$204 $165 $1,950 $789 $2,154 $954 
2021 activity:
1st Commonwealth amortization— 20 — — — 20 
Colombo Bank amortization— — — 285 — 285 
Balance at December 31, 2021$204 $185 $1,950 $1,074 $2,154 $1,259 
2022 activity:
1st Commonwealth amortization— 19 — — — 19 
Colombo Bank amortization— — — 243 — 243 
Balance at December 31, 2022$204 $204 $1,950 $1,317 $2,154 $1,521 
 
 Acquisition of
1st Commonwealth
 Acquisition of
Colombo Bank
 Total 
 
 Gross
Carrying
Amount
 Accumulated
Amortization
 Gross
Carrying
Amount
 Accumulated
Amortization
 Gross
Carrying
Amount
 Accumulated
Amortization
 

Balance at December 31, 2017

 $204 $105 $ $ $204 $105 

2018 activity:

                   

1st Commonwealth amortization

    20        20 

Acquisition of Colombo Bank

      1,950  98  1,950  98 

Balance at December 31, 2018

 $204 $125 $1,950 $98 $2,154 $223 

2019 activity:

                   

1st Commonwealth amortization

    20        20 

Colombo Bank amortization

        365    365 

Balance at December 31, 2019

 $204 $145 $1,950 $463 $2,154 $608 

Table of Contents


Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(Dollars in thousands, except share and per share data)

Note 7. Goodwill and Intangibles (Continued)

The aggregate amortization expense was $385$262 thousand for 20192022 and $118$305 thousand for 2018. The2021. As of December 31, 2022, the estimated amortization expense for the next five years and thereafter is as follows:

2023$205 
2024165 
2025125 
202685 
202745 
Thereafter
$633 

2020

 $345 

2021

  305 

2022

  262 

2023

  205 

2024

  165 

Thereafter

  264 

The carrying amount of goodwill for the years ended December 31, 20192022 and 2018 were2021 is as follows:

Balance at December 31, 2022 and 2021$7,157 
91

Balance at December 31, 2017

 $ 

Acquisition of Colombo Bank

  6,512 

Balance at December 31, 2018

 $6,512 

Colombo measurement period adjustment

  631 

Balance at December 31, 2019

 $7,143 


Table of Contents
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
Note 8.7. Premises, Equipment, and Equipment

        A summary ofLeases

The following table summarizes the cost and accumulated depreciation of premises and equipment follows:

as of December 31, 2022 and 2021:
20222021
Leasehold improvements$3,068 $3,039 
Furniture, fixtures and equipment4,310 4,163 
Computer software1,169 1,275 
Land61 61 
Buildings196 196 
Vehicles47 47 
   Premises and equipment, gross$8,851 $8,781 
Less: accumulated depreciation7,631 7,197 
   Premises and equipment, net$1,220 $1,584 
 
 2019 2018 

Leasehold improvements

 $2,899 $2,915 

Furniture, fixtures and equipment

  3,957  3,799 

Computer software

  1,079  756 

Land

  61  61 

Buildings

  196  196 

 $8,192 $7,727 

Less: accumulated depreciation

  6,108  5,456 

 $2,084 $2,271 

For the years ended December 31, 20192022 and 2018,2021, depreciation expense was $643$424 thousand and $497$555 thousand, respectively.

The Company has entered into operating leases for office space over various terms. The leases cover an agreed upon period of time and generally have options to renew and are subject to annual increases as well as allocations for real estate taxes and certain operating expenses.


Table of Contents


Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(Dollars in thousands, except share and per share data)

Note 8. Premises and Equipment (Continued)

The following tables present information about leases:

leases as of and for the years ended December 31, 2022 and 2021:
20222021
Right-of-Use-Asset$9,680 $10,167 
Lease Liability$10,394 $11,111 
Weighted Average Remaining Lease Term (Years)7.98.9
Weighted Average discount rate3.21 %3.20 %
Years Ended December 31,
20222021
Operating Lease Expense$1,504 $1,626 
Cash paid for amounts included in lease liabilities$1,541 $1,559 
Modification of right-of-use assets and lease liability283 — 
Right-of-use assets obtained in exchange for operating lease liabilities522 207 
92

Table of Contents
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
 
 December 31,
2019
 

Right-of-Use-Asset

 $13,279 

Lease Liability

 $13,686 

Weighted Average Remaining Lease Term (Years)

  11.1 

Weighted Average discount rate

  3.32%


 
 Years Ended
December 31,
 
 
 2019 2018 

Operating Lease Expense

 $1,784 $1,331 

Cash paid for amounts included in lease liabilities

 $1,642  N/A 

Right-of-use assets obtained in exchange for operating lease liabilities

 $2,378  N/A 

The following table presents a maturity schedule of undiscounted cash flows that contribute to the lease liability:

liability as of December 31, 2022:
2023$1,780 
20241,734 
20251,581 
20261,486 
20271,355 
Thereafter3,860 
Total$11,796 
Less: discount(1,402)
$10,394 

2020

 $1,582 

2021

  1,559 

2022

  1,599 

2023

  1,596 

2024

  1,566 

Thereafter

  8,553 

Total

 $16,455 

Less: discount

  (2,769)

 $13,686 

Note 9.8. Deposits

Remaining maturities on certificates of deposit are as follows:

follows as of December 31, 2022:
2023$413,617 
202418,107 
202548,284 
202611,086 
202717,315 
Thereafter
$508,413 

2020

 $323,822 

2021

  61,482 

2022

  23,020 

2023

  9,048 

2024

  4,967 

 $422,339 

Total time deposits ofgreater than $250,000 and greater were $147.5$159.5 million and $135.6$89.7 million at December 31, 20192022 and 2018,2021, respectively.


Table of Contents


Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(Dollars in thousands, except share and per share data)

Note 9. Deposits (Continued)

At December 31, 20192022 and 2018,2021, the Company had one and two customer relationships, respectively,relationship whose related balance on deposit exceeded 5% of outstanding deposits. TheseThis customer relationships comprise 7%relationship comprises 9% of outstanding deposits at December 31, 20192022 and 13%17% of outstanding deposits at December 31, 2018.

2021.

Brokered deposits totaled $100.0$248.0 million and $84.4$35.0 million at December 31, 20192022 and 2018,2021, respectively.

Note 10.9. Other Borrowed Funds

Other borrowed funds at December 31, 20192022 and 20182021 consist of the following:

Federal Funds PurchasedFHLB AdvancesSubordinated Debt, net
202220212022202120222021
Balance Outstanding at December 31,$30,000 $— $235,000 $25,000 $19,565 $19,510 
Maximum balance at any month end during the year$115,000 $— $235,000 $25,000 $19,565 $44,167 
Average balance for the year$22,164 $22 $48,134 $25,000 $19,535 $37,856 
Weighted average rate on borrowings for the year ended3.11 %0.20 %2.60 %1.39 %5.28 %6.69 %
93

Table of Contents
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
 
 2019 2018 
 
 Amount Weighted
Average Rate
 Amount Weighted
Average Rate
 

Federal funds purchased

 $10,000  1.60%$   

FHLB advances

  15,000  1.73%    

Subordinated debt

  24,487  6.00% 24,407  6.00%

Total borrowings

 $49,487  3.82%$24,407  6.00%

The Company had $15$235.0 million and $25.0 million of FHLB advances at each of December 31, 20192022 and $0December 31, 2021 respectively. $200.0 million of FHLB advances outstanding at December, 31, 2018.2022 mature during the first quarter of 2023 while the remaining $35.0 million represents a daily rate borrowing that matures in December 2023. At December 31, 2019,2022, 1-4 family residential loans with a lendable value of $2.1$168.8 million, multi-family residential loans with a booklendable value of $5.9$43.0 million, home equity lines of credit with a booklendable value of $11.9$6.1 million and commercial real estate loans with a booklendable value of $93.5$155.7 million were pledged against an available line of credit with the Federal Home Loan BankFHLB totaling $113.3$584.7 million as of December 31, 2019.2022. The Bank has a letter of credit with the FHLB in the amount of $95.0 million for the purpose of providing collateral for Virginia public deposits. The remaining lendable collateral value excess at December 31, 20192022 totaled $295.5$138.5 million.

The Company has unsecured lines of credit with correspondent banks totaling $199.0$265.0 million at December 31, 20192022 and $169.0$265.0 million at December 31, 2018,2021, available for overnight borrowing. At December 31, 2019 and 2018, $10.02022, the Company had an advance of $30 million and $0, respectively,with one of these lines of credit withthe correspondent banks were drawn upon.

and none in 2021.

On June 20, 2016, the Company issued $25.0 million in fixed-to-floating rate subordinated notes due June 30, 2026 in a private placement transaction. Interest iswas payable at 6.00% per annum, from and including June 20, 2016 to, but excluding June 30, 2021, payable semi-annually in arrears. From and including June 30, 2021 to the maturity date or early redemption date, the interest rate shallwas to reset quarterly to an interest rate per annum equal to the then current three-month LIBOR rate plus 487 basis points, payable quarterly in arrears.

The Company may, at itshad the option, beginning with the interest payment date of June 30, 2021 and on any scheduled interest payment date thereafteron or after June 30, 2021, to redeem the subordinated notes, in whole or in part, upon not fewer than 30 nor greater than 60 days' notice to holders, at a redemption price equal to 100% of the principal amount of the subordinated notes to be redeemed plus accrued and unpaid interest to, but excluding, the date of redemption. Any partialIn August 2021, the Company provided a redemption will be made pro rata among allnotice to each holder of the holders.


Tablesubordinated notes that the notes would be redeemed in full on September 30, 2021 or such later date as the holder returned its note to the Company. $23.8 million of Contents


Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(Dollarsprincipal was redeemed and paid during the year ended December 31, 2021. The remaining principal balance of $1.2 million as of December 31, 2021 is included in thousands, except share and per share data)

Note 10. Other Borrowed Funds (Continued)

other liabilities. The remaining note holders redeemed their notes in February 2022. The notes stopped accruing interest effective as of September 30, 2021 redemption date.

On October 13, 2020, the Company completed its private placement of $20 million of its 4.875% fixed-to-floating subordinated notes due 2030 (the "Notes") to certain qualified institutional buyers and accredited investors. The Notes have a maturity date of October 15, 2030 and carry a fixed rate of interest of 4.875% for the first five years. Thereafter, the Notes will pay interest at the then current three-month Secured Overnight Financing Rate plus 471 basis points, resetting quarterly. The Notes include a right of prepayment without penalty on or after October 15, 2025. The Company used the proceeds from the placement of the Notes for general corporate purposes, including to support capital ratios at the Bank, and the repayment of the $25.0 million outstanding subordinated debt called in August 2021. The Notes qualify as Tier 2 capital for the Company to the fullest extent permitted under the BASELBasel III capital rules. When contributed to the capital of the Bank, the proceeds of the subordinated notes may be included in Tier 1 capital for the Bank. At December 31, 2019 and 2018, $21 million
94

Table of the proceeds of the Company's subordinated notes have been includedContents
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(Dollars in the Bank's Tier 1 capital.

thousands, except per share data)

Note 11.10. Income Taxes

The tax effects of temporary differences that give rise to significant portions of the deferred tax assets and deferred tax liabilities at December 31, 20192022 and 20182021 are presented below:

20222021
Deferred Tax Assets:  
Allowance for loan losses$3,698 $3,131 
Net operating loss carryforward – federal and state2,466 2,785 
Bank premises and equipment265 184 
Nonqualified stock options and restricted stock658 611 
Organizational and start-up expenses10 22 
Acquisition accounting adjustments257 258 
Non-accrual loan interest59 24 
Deferred loan costs60 801 
Lease liability2,396 2,516 
Unrealized loss on securities available for sale11,876 582 
Unrealized loss on interest rate swap— 17 
$21,745 $10,931 
Deferred Tax Liabilities:
Right-of-use assets$(2,232)$(2,302)
Unrealized gain on interest rate swap(980)— 
$(3,212)$(2,302)
Net Deferred Tax Assets$18,533 $8,629 
 
 2019 2018 

Deferred Tax Assets:

       

Allowance for loan losses

 $2,302 $2,132 

Net operating loss carryforward—federal and state

  3,666  4,270 

Bank premises and equipment and deferred rent

  168  213 

Unrealized loss on securities available for sale

    732 

Nonqualified stock options and restricted stock

  554  496 

Organizational and start-up expenses

  47  61 

Acquisition accounting adjustments

  454  372 

Non-accrual loan interest

  58  20 

Deferred loan (fees) costs

  526  295 

Lease liability

  3,079   

Unrealized loss on interest rate swap

  18   

 $10,872 $8,591 

Deferred Tax Liabilities:

       

Right-of-use assets

 $(2,987)$ 

Unrealized gain on securities available for sale

  (214)  

 $(3,201)$ 

Net Deferred Tax Assets

 $7,671 $8,591 

The income tax expense charged to operations for the years ended December 31, 20192022 and 20182021 consists of the following:

20222021
Current tax expense$5,610 $5,269 
Deferred tax expense395 1,007 
$6,005 $6,276 
 
 2019 2018 

Current tax expense

 $3,999 $3,104 

Deferred tax expense (benefit)

  185  (866)

 $4,184 $2,238 

Table of Contents


Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(Dollars in thousands, except share and per share data)

Note 11. Income Taxes (Continued)

Income tax expense differed from amounts computed by applying the U.S. federal income tax rate to income, before income tax expense as a result of the following:

20222021
Computed "expected" tax expense$6,313 $5,924 
Increase (decrease) in income taxes resulting from:
State income tax expense503 472 
Non-deductible expense138 231 
Tax free income(259)(217)
Tax benefits from exercise of stock options(364)(163)
Other(326)29 
$6,005 $6,276 
 
 2019 2018 

Computed "expected" tax expense

 $4,203 $2,753 

Increase (decrease) in income taxes resulting from:

       

State income tax expense (benefit)

  490  (86)

Non-deductible expense

  38  141 

Tax free income

  (158) (112)

Tax benefits from exercise of stock options

  (179) (308)

Other

  (210) (150)

 $4,184 $2,238 

The Company files income tax returns in the U.S. federal jurisdiction. With few exceptions, the Company is no longer subject to U.S. federal examination by tax authorities for years prior to 2016.

2019.

95

Table of Contents
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
Under the provisions of the Internal Revenue Code, the Company has $14.9$10.1 million of net operating loss carryforwards acquired from Colombo which can be offset against future taxable income. The carryforwards expire through December 31, 2037. The full realization of tax benefits associated with carryforwards depends predominately upon the recognition of ordinary income during the carryforward period. Beginning in 2019, theThe federal portion of net operating loss carryforwards available to offset taxable income is limited to $762 thousand annually under Internal Revenue Code section 382. The Company believes it will generate sufficient future taxable income to fully utilize the remaining deferred tax assets.

Note 12.11. Derivative Financial Instruments

The Company enters into interest rate swap agreements ("swap agreements") to facilitate the risk management strategies needed in order to accommodate the needs of its banking customers. The Company mitigates the risk of entering into these loan agreements by entering into equal and offsetting swap agreements with highly-rated third party financial institutions. These back-to-back swap agreements are free-standing derivatives and are recorded at fair value in the Company's consolidated statements of condition (asset positions are included in other assets and liability positions are included in other liabilities) as of December 31, 2019.2022. The Company is party to master netting arrangements with its financial institution counterparty; however, the Company does not offset assets and liabilities under these arrangements for financial statement presentation purposes. The master netting arrangements provide for a single net settlement of all swap agreements, as well as collateral, in the event of default on, or termination of, any one contract. Parties to a centrally cleared over-the-counter derivative exchange daily payments that reflect the daily change in value of the derivative. These payments, commonly referred to as variation margin, are recorded as settlements of the derivatives' mark-to-market exposure rather than collateral against the exposures, which effectively results in any centrally cleared derivative having a Level 2 fair value that approximates zero on a daily basis, and therefore, these swap agreements were not included in the offsetting table in the Fair Value Measurement section. As of December 31, 2019,2022, the Company entered into 1715 interest rate swap agreements which arewere collateralized by $6.1 million$30 thousand in cash. As of December 31, 2018,2021, the Company entered into eight19 interest rate swap agreements which arewere collateralized by $1.6$6.7 million in cash.


Table of Contents


Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(Dollars in thousands, except share and per share data)

Note 12. Derivative Financial Instruments (Continued)

The notional amount and fair value of the Company's derivative financial instruments as of December 31, 20192022 and 20182021 were as follows:

December 31, 2022
Notional AmountFair Value
Interest Rate Swap Agreements
Receive Fixed/Pay Variable Swaps$74,178 $4,260 
Pay Fixed/Receive Variable Swaps74,178 (4,260)
 
 December 31, 2019 
 
 Notional
Amount
 Fair Value 

Interest Rate Swap Agreements

       

Receive Fixed/Pay Variable Swaps

 $94,755 $(6,001)

Pay Fixed/Receive Variable Swaps

  94,755  6,001 


December 31, 2021
Notional AmountFair Value
Interest Rate Swap Agreements
Receive Fixed/Pay Variable Swaps$80,643 $6,052 
Pay Fixed/Receive Variable Swaps80,643 (6,052)
 
 December 31, 2018 
 
 Notional
Amount
 Fair Value 

Interest Rate Swap Agreements

       

Receive Fixed/Pay Variable Swaps

 $47,381 $(1,705)

Pay Fixed/Receive Variable Swaps

  47,381  1,705 

Interest Rate Risk Management—Cash Flow Hedging Instruments

The Company uses FHLB advances and other wholesale funding from time to time as a source of funds for use in the Company's lending and investment activities and other general business purposes. This wholesale funding exposes the Company to increased interest rate risk as a result of the variability in cash flows (future interest payments). The Company believes it is prudent to reduce this interest rate risk. To meet this objective, the Company entered into an interest rate swap agreementagreements whereby the Company reduces the interest rate risk associated with the Company's variable rate advances (or other wholesale funding) from the designation date of July 30, 2019 and going through July 30, 2022 (thethe maturity date).

date.

96

Table of Contents
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
At December 31, 2019,2022 and 2021, the information pertaining to outstanding interest rate swap agreements used to hedge variability in cash flows (FHLB advance which is included in other borrowed funds on the consolidated balance sheet) is as follows:

(Dollars in thousands)20222021
Notional amount$145,000 $60,000 
Weighted average pay rate2.12 %0.87 %
Weighted average receive rate4.74 %0.21 %
Weighted average maturity in years3.491.1
Unrealized gain/(loss) relating to interest rate swaps$4,251 $(77)
(Dollars in thousands)
  
 

Notional amount

 $15,000 

Weighted average pay rate

  1.88%

Weighted average receive rate

  1.90%

Weighted average maturity in years

  3 year 

Unrealized loss relating to interest rate swaps

 $(80)

These agreements provided for the Company to receive payments determined by a specific index (three month LIBOR) in exchange for making payments at a fixed rate. At December 31, 2019,2022 and 2021, the unrealized loss or gain relating to interest rate swaps designated as hedging instruments of the variability of cash flows associated with FHLB advanceswholesale funds are reported in other comprehensive income.income (loss). These amounts are subsequently reclassified into interest expense as a yield adjustment in the same period in which the related interest on the advance affects earnings. The Company measures cash flow hedging relationships for effectiveness on a monthly basis, and at December 31, 2019,2022 and 2021, the hedges were highly effective and the amount of ineffectiveness reflected in earnings was de minimus.


Table of Contents


Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(Dollars in thousands, except share and per share data)

Note 13.12. Financial Instruments with Off-Balance Sheet Risk

The Company is party to credit-related financial instruments with off-balance sheet risk in the normal course of business to meet the financing needs of its customers. These financial instruments include commitments to extend credit and standby letters of credit. Such commitments involve, to varying degrees, elements of credit and interest rate risk in excess of the amount recognized in the balance sheet.

The Company's exposure to credit loss is represented by the contractual amount of these commitments. The Company follows the same credit policies in making commitments as it does for on-balance sheet instruments.

At December 31, 20192022 and 2018,2021, the following financial instruments were outstanding which contract amounts represent credit risk:

20222021
Commitments to grant loans$135,441 $90,591 
Unused commitments to fund loans and lines of credit235,617 183,145 
Commercial and standby letters of credit6,503 8,930 
 
 2019 2018 

Commitments to grant loans

 $27,260 $22,349 

Unused commitments to fund loans and lines of credit

  244,367  216,043 

Commercial and standby letters of credit

  9,002  9,383 

Commitments to extend credit are agreements to lend to a customer as long as there is no violation of any condition established in the contract. Commitments generally have fixed expiration dates or other termination clauses and may require payment of a fee. The commitments for equity lines of credit may expire without being drawn upon. Therefore, the total commitment amounts do not necessarily represent future cash requirements. The amount of collateral obtained, if it is deemed necessary by the Company, is based on management's credit evaluation of the customer.

Unfunded commitments under commercial lines of credit, revolving credit lines and overdraft protection agreements are commitments for possible future extensions of credit to existing customers. These lines of credit usually do not contain a specified maturity date and may not be drawn upon to the total extent to which the Company is committed. The amount of collateral obtained, if it is deemed necessary by the Company, is based on management's credit evaluation of the customer.

Commercial and standby letters of credit are conditional commitments issued by the Company to guarantee the performance of a customer to a third party. Those letters of credit are primarily issued to support public and private borrowing arrangements. Substantially all letters of credit issued have expiration dates within one year. The credit risk involved in issuing letters of credit is essentially the same as that involved in extending loan facilities to customers. The Company generally holds collateral supporting those commitments, if deemed necessary.

97

Table of Contents
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
The Company maintains its cash accounts with the Federal Reserve BankFRB and correspondent banks. The total amount of cash on deposit in correspondent banks exceeding the federally insured limits was $10.6$1.4 million and $5.1$32.8 million at December 31, 20192022 and 2018,2021, respectively.

Note 14.13. Minimum Regulatory Capital Requirements

        In August, 2018, the Federal Reserve updated the Small Bank Holding Company Policy Statement (the "Statement"), in compliance with the Economic Growth, Regulatory Relief and Consumer Protection Act of 2018 ("EGRRCPA"). The Statement, among other things, exempts bank holding companies that have below a specified asset threshold from the consolidated regulatory capital


Table of Contents


Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(Dollars in thousands, except share and per share data)

Note 14. Minimum Regulatory Capital Requirements (Continued)

requirements. The interim final rule expands the exemption to bank holding companies with consolidated total assets of less than $3 billion. Prior to August 2018, the statement exempted bank holding companies with consolidated total assets of less than $1 billion. As a result of the interim final rule, the Company qualifies as of August 2018 as a small bank holding company and is no longer subject to regulatory capital requirements on a consolidated basis.

Banks and bank holding companies are subject to various regulatory capital requirements administered by the federal banking agencies. Failure to meet minimum capital requirements can initiate certain mandatory, possibly additional discretionary, actions by regulators that, if undertaken, could have a direct material effect on the Bank'sCompany’s financial statements. Under capital adequacy guidelines and the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action, financial institutions must meet specific capital guidelines that involve quantitative measures of assets, liabilities, and certain off-balance-sheetoff-balance sheet items as calculated under regulatory accounting practices. A financial institution'sinstitution’s capital amounts and classification are also subject to qualitative judgments by the regulators about components, risk weightings, and other factors.


In August, 2018, the Federal Reserve updated the Small Bank Holding Company Policy Statement (the “Statement”), in compliance with the Economic Growth, Regulatory Relief and Consumer Protection Act of 2018 (“EGRRCPA”). The Statement, among other things, exempts bank holding companies that have assets below a specified asset threshold from the consolidated regulatory capital requirements. The rule expanded the exemption to bank holding companies with consolidated total assets of less than $3 billion. Prior to August 2018, the statement exempted bank holding companies with consolidated total assets of less than $1 billion. As a result of the rule, the Company qualifies as a small bank holding company and is no longer subject to regulatory capital requirements on a consolidated basis.

The final rules implementing Basel Committee on Banking Supervision'sSupervision’s capital guidelines for U.S. banks (the (“Basel III rules)III”) became effective for the Bank on January 1, 2015 with full compliance with all of the requirements being phased in over a multi-year schedule, and fully phased in by January 1, 2019. As a part of the new requirements, the Common Equity Tier 1 Capital ratio is calculated and utilized in the assessment of capital for all institutions. The Company has made an election to not have the net unrealized gain or loss on available-for-sale securities included in computing regulatory capital. Under the Basel III rules, the Bankinstitutions must hold a capital conservation buffer above the adequately capitalized risk-based capital ratios. The capital conservation buffer was phased in from 0.625% for 2016 to 2.50% by 2019. The capital conservation buffer for 2019 is 2.50%. Management believes as of December 31, 2019 and 2018, the Bank meets all capital adequacy requirement to which they are subject.


Prompt corrective action regulations, which also apply to the Bank, provide five classifications: well capitalized, adequately capitalized, undercapitalized, significantly undercapitalized, and critically undercapitalized, although these terms are not used to represent overall financial condition. If adequately capitalized, regulatory approval is required to accept brokered deposits. If undercapitalized, capital distributions are limited, as is asset growth and expansion, and capital restoration plans are required. At year-end 2019 and 2018, the most recent regulatory notification categorized the Bank as well capitalized under the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action. There are no conditions or events since that notification that management believes have changed the institution's category.

        Federal and state banking regulations place certain restrictions on dividends paid by the Company. The total amount of dividends which may be paid at any date is generally limited to retained earnings of the Company.


Pursuant to the EGRRCPA, regulatorsfederal banking agencies have provided for an optional, simplified measure of capital adequacy, the community bank leverage ratio (“CBLR”) framework, ("CBLR"), for qualifying community bank organizations. Banksorganizations with less than $10 billion in consolidated total assets. Organizations that qualify maycould opt in to the CBLR framework beginning January 1, 2020 or any time thereafter. The CBLR framework eliminates the four required capital ratios disclosed below and requires the disclosure ofAn institution that maintains a single leverage ratio with a minimum requirement of 9%. Thethat exceeds the CBLR is considered to have met all generally applicable leverage and risk based capital requirements (including the Basel III rules), the capital ratio requirements for “well capitalized” status under the prompt corrective action regulations, and any other leverage or capital requirements to which it is subject. On January 1, 2020, the Company is evaluating whether to optopted in to the CBLR framework.


Effective September 30, 2022, we opted out of the CBLR framework. A banking organization that opts out of the CBLR framework can subsequently opt back into the CBLR framework if it meets the criteria proscribed. As of December 31, 2022 and 2021, the Bank meets all capital adequacy requirements to which it is subject and is considered well capitalized under the prompt corrective action regulations.

98

Table of Contents


Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(Dollars in thousands, except share and per share data)

Note 14. Minimum Regulatory Capital Requirements (Continued)

The Bank continues to be subject to various capital requirements administered by banking agencies. Risk based capital ratios for the Bank as of December 31, 20192022 and 20182021 are shown in the following table.

 
 Actual Minimum Capital
Requirement(1)
 Well Capitalized
Under Prompt
Corrective Action
Provisions
 
 
 Amount Ratio Amount Ratio Amount Ratio 

As of December 31, 2019:

                   

Total Risk Based Capital (to Risk Weighted Assets)

 $192,364  13.43%$150,369  10.500%$143,208  10.000%

Tier 1 Capital (to Risk Weighted Assets)

 $182,121  12.72%$121,727  8.500%$114,567  8.000%

Common Tier 1 (CET1) (to Risk Weighted Assets)

 $182,121  12.72%$100,246  7.000%$93,085  6.500%

Tier 1 Capital (to Average Assets)

 $182,121  12.15%$98,214  6.500%$75,550  5.000%

As of December 31, 2018:

  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
 

Total Risk Based Capital

                   

(to Risk Weighted Assets)

 $172,975  14.02%$121,861  9.875%$123,404  10.000%

Tier 1 Capital (to Risk Weighted Assets)

 $163,804  13.27%$97,180  7.875%$98,723  8.000%

Common Tier 1 (CET1) (to Risk Weighted Assets)

 $163,804  13.27%$78,670  6.375%$80,213  6.500%

Tier 1 Capital (to Average Assets)

 $163,804  12.41%$52,777  4.000%$65,971  5.000%

ActualMinimum Capital RequirementMinimum to be Well Capitalized Under Prompt Corrective Action
AmountRatioAmount
Ratio (1)
Amount
Ratio
At December 31, 2022
Total risk-based capital$256,898 13.28 %$203,113 10.50 %$193,441 >10.00 %
Tier 1 risk-based capital240,858 12.45 %164,425 8.50 %154,753 >8.00 %
Common equity tier 1 capital240,858 12.45 %135,409 7.00 %125,737 >6.50 %
Leverage capital ratio240,858 10.75 %87,894 4.00 %109,867 >5.00 %
At December 31, 2021
Total risk-based capital$222,871 13.54 %$177,069 10.50 %$168,638 >10.00 %
Tier 1 risk-based capital214,442 12.72 %143,342 8.50 %134,910 >8.00 %
Common equity tier 1 capital214,442 12.72 %118,046 7.00 %109,614 >6.50 %
Leverage capital ratio214,442 10.55 %81,712 4.00 %102,140 >5.00 %
(1)
Except with regard to the Bank's Tier 1 to average assets ratio, the minimum capital requirement includes the phased-in portion of the Basel III Capital Rules Ratios include capital conservation buffer.

Dividend Restrictions—Restrictions – The Company's principal source of funds for dividend payments is dividends received from the Bank. Banking regulations limit the amounts of dividends that may be paid without approval of regulatory agencies. As of December 31, 2019, $40.72022, $44.7 million of retained earnings is available to pay dividends.

Note 15.14. Related Party Transactions

Officers, directors and their affiliates had borrowings of $14.5$37.9 million and $14.8$19.5 million at December 31, 20192022 and 20182021, respectively, with the Company. During the years ended December 31, 20192022 and 2018,2021, total principal additions were $292 thousand$19.9 million and $4.2$9.0 million, respectively, and total principal payments were $611 thousand$1.5 million and $898 thousand,$3.8 million, respectively.

Related party deposits amounted to $46.2$38.4 million and $36.8$31.7 million at December 31, 20192022 and 2018,2021, respectively.

Note 16.15. Stock-Based Compensation Plan

The Company's Amended and Restated 2008 OptionStock Plan (the Plan)"Plan"), which is shareholder-approved, was adopted to advance the interests of the Company by providing selected key employees of the Company, their affiliates, and directors with the opportunity to acquire shares of common stock. In


Table of Contents


Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(Dollars in thousands, except share and per share data)

Note 16. Stock-Based Compensation Plan (Continued)

June 2018, May 2022, the shareholders approved an amendment to the Amended and Restated 2008 Plan to extend the term of the plan until 2028 and increase the number of shares authorized for issuance under the Plan by 200,000 shares.

The maximum number of shares with respect to which awards may be made is 2,529,2962,929,296 shares of common stock, subject to adjustment for certain corporate events. Option awards are generally granted with an exercise price equal to the market price of the Company's stock at the date of grant, generally vest annually over four years of continuous service and have ten yearyears contractual terms. At December 31, 2019, 164,1952022, 157,263 shares were available to grant under the Plan.

No options were granted during 20192022 and 2018.2021. For the year ended December 31, 2019, 17,4912022, 4,772 shares were withheld from issuance upon exercise of options in order to cover the cost of the exercise by the participant.

For the year ended December 31, 2018, 7,6432021, there were no shares were withheld from issuance upon exercise of options in order to cover the cost of the exercise by the participant.

99

Table of Contents
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
A summary of option activity under the Plan as of December 31, 2019,2022, and changes during the year then ended is presented below:

Options
 Shares Weighted-
Average
Exercise
Price
 Weighted-
Average
Remaining
Contractual
Term
 Aggregate
Intrinsic
Value(1)
 

Outstanding at January 1, 2019

  1,976,247 $8.00  4.98    

Granted

           

Exercised

  (173,987) 7.01       

Forfeited or expired

  (4,744) 10.38       

Outstanding at December 31, 2019

  1,797,516 $8.09  4.10 $16,863,327 

Exercisable at December 31, 2019

  1,716,310 $7.93  3.99 $16,380,151 

OptionsSharesWeighted
Average
Exercise
Price
Weighted
Average
Remaining
Contractual
Term
Aggregate
Intrinsic
Value (1)
Outstanding at January 1, 20221,931,059 $6.65 2.46— 
Granted— — 
Exercised(309,018)5.74 
Forfeited or expired(121)6.85 
Outstanding and Exercisable at December 31, 20221,621,920 $6.82 1.81$13,681,905 
________________________
(1)
The aggregate intrinsic value of stock options represents the total pre-tax intrinsic value (the amount by which the current market value of the underlying stock exceeds the exercise price of the option) that would have been received by the option holders had all option holders exercised their options on December 31, 2019.2022. This amount changes based on changes in the market value of the Company's stock.

As of December 31, 2022, all outstanding shares of the Plan are fully vested and amortized. Tax benefits recognized for qualified and non-qualified stock option exercises during 2022 and 2021 totaled $364 thousand and $163 thousand, respectively.
A summary of the Company's restricted stock grant activity as of December 31, 2022 is shown below.
Number of
Shares
Weighted Average
Grant Date
Fair Value
Nonvested at January 1, 2022189,240 $14.34 
Granted155,399 14.95 
Vested(58,401)14.53 
Forfeited(7,993)14.59 
Balance at December 31, 2022278,245 $14.63 
The compensation cost that has been charged to income for the plan was $679 thousand$1.2 million and $707 thousand$1.0 million for 20192022 and 2018,2021, respectively. As of December 31, 2019,2022, there was unamortized compensation expense of $63 thousand that will be amortized over 4 months. Tax benefits recognized for qualified and non-qualified stock options during 2019 and 2018 totaled $179 thousand and $308 thousand, respectively.


Table of Contents


Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(Dollars in thousands, except share and per share data)

Note 16. Stock-Based Compensation Plan (Continued)

        A summary of the Company's restricted stock grant activity as of December 31, 2019 is shown below.

 
 Number of
Shares
 Weighted
Average
Grant Date
Fair Value
 

Nonvested at January 1, 2019

  50,629 $17.57 

Granted

  79,960  19.17 

Vested

  (15,465) 17.50 

Forfeited

  (5,406) 18.49 

Balance at December 31, 2019

  109,718 $18.70 

        As of December 31, 2019, there was $1.8$3.2 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to nonvested restricted shares granted under the Plan. The cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 3736 months.

Note 17.16. Fair Value Measurements

Determination of Fair Value

The Company uses fair value measurements to record fair value adjustments to certain assets and liabilities and to determine fair value disclosures. In accordance withFair Value Measurements and Disclosures topic of FASB ASC, the fair value of a financial instrument is the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. Fair value is best determined based upon quoted market prices. However, in many instances, there are no quoted market prices for the Company's various financial instruments. In cases where quoted market prices are not available, fair values are based on estimates using present value or other valuation techniques. Those techniques are significantly affected by the assumptions used, including the discount rate and estimates of future cash flows. Accordingly, the fair value estimates may not be realized in an immediate settlement of the instrument.

100

Table of Contents
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
The fair value guidance provides a consistent definition of fair value, which focuses on exit price in an orderly transaction (that is, not a forced liquidation or distressed sale) between market participants at the measurement date under current market conditions. If there has been a significant decrease in the volume and level of activity for the asset or liability, a change in valuation technique or the use of multiple valuation techniques may be appropriate. In such instances, determining the price at which willing market participants would transact at the measurement date under current market conditions depends on the facts and circumstances and requires the use of significant judgment. The fair value is a reasonable point within the range that is most representative of fair value under current market conditions.


Table of Contents


Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(Dollars in thousands, except share and per share data)

Note 17. Fair Value Measurements (Continued)

In accordance with this guidance, the Company groups its financial assets and financial liabilities generally measured at fair value in three levels, based on the markets in which the assets and liabilities are traded and the reliability of the assumptions used to determine fair value.

Level 1 — Valuation is based on quoted prices in active markets for identical assets and liabilities.



Level 1Valuation is based on quoted prices in active markets for identical assets and liabilities.
Level 2Valuation is based on observable inputs including quoted prices in active markets for similar assets and liabilities, quoted prices for identical or similar assets and liabilities in less active markets, and model-basedLevel 2 — Valuation is based on observable inputs including quoted prices in active markets for similar assets and liabilities, quoted prices for identical or similar assets and liabilities in less active markets, and model -based valuation techniques for which significant assumptions can be derived primarily from or corroborated by observable data in the market.
Level 3Valuation is based on model-based techniques that use one or more significant inputs or assumptions that are unobservable in the market.

Level 3 — Valuation is based on model-based techniques that use one or more significant inputs or assumptions that are unobservable in the market.
The following describes the valuation techniques used by the Company to measure certain financial assets and liabilities recorded at fair value on a recurring basis in the financial statements:

Securities available-for-sale:available-for-sale: Securities available-for-sale are recorded at fair value on a recurring basis. Fair value measurement is based upon quoted market prices, when available (Level 1). If quoted market prices are not available, fair values are measured utilizing independent valuation techniques of identical or similar securities for which significant assumptions are derived primarily from or corroborated by observable market data. Third party vendors compile prices from various sources and may determine the fair value of identical or similar securities by using pricing models that consider observable market data (Level 2).

Derivatives assets and liabilities:
Cash flow hedges: The Company has loan interest rate swap derivatives and interest rate swap derivatives on certain time deposits and borrowings, which the latter are designated as cash flow hedges. These derivatives are recorded at fair value using published yield curve rates from a national valuation service. These observable rates and inputs are applied to a third party industry-wide valuation model, and therefore, the valuations fall into a Level 2 category.
101

Table of Contents
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
The following table presents the balances of financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of December 31, 20192022 and 2018:

2021:
Fair Value Measurements at
December 31, 2022 Using
Balance as of
December 31, 2022
Quoted Prices
in Active
Markets for
Identical
Assets
Significant
Other
Observable
Inputs
Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
Description(Level 1)(Level 2)(Level 3)
Assets
Available-for-sale
Securities of U.S. government and federal agencies$11,004 $— $11,004 $— 
Securities of state and local municipalities tax exempt1,376 — 1,376 — 
Securities of state and local municipalities taxable444 — 444 — 
Corporate bonds19,058 — 19,058 — 
SBA pass-through securities67 — 67 — 
Mortgage-backed securities237,434 — 237,434 — 
Collateralized mortgage obligations8,686 — 8,686 — 
Total Available-for-Sale Securities$278,069 $— $278,069 $— 
Derivative assets - interest rate swaps$4,260 $— $4,260 $— 
Derivative assets - cash flow hedge4,251 — 4,251 — 
Liabilities
Derivative liabilties - interest rate swaps$4,260 $— $4,260 $— 
102

 
  
 Fair Value Measurements at
December 31, 2019 Using
 
 
  
 Quoted Prices
in Active
Markets for
Identical
Assets
  
  
 
 
  
 Significant
Other
Observable
Inputs
  
 
 
  
 Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
 
 
 Balance as of
December 31,
2019
 
Description
 (Level 1) (Level 2) (Level 3) 

Assets

             

Available-for-sale

             

Securities of U.S. government and federal agencies

 $3,996 $ $3,996 $ 

Securities of state and local municipalities tax exempt

  3,738    3,738   

Securities of state and local municipalities taxable

  955    955   

Corporate bonds

  6,981    6,981   

SBA pass-through securities

  159    159   

Mortgage-backed securities

  97,189    97,189   

Collateralized mortgage obligations

  28,307    28,307   

Total Available-for-Sale Securities

 $141,325 $ $141,325 $ 

Table of Contents


Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(Dollars in thousands, except share and per share data)

Note 17. Fair Value Measurements (Continued)



  
 Fair Value Measurements at
December 31, 2018 Using
 

  
 Quoted Prices
in Active
Markets for
Identical
Assets
  
  
 

  
 Significant
Other
Observable
Inputs
  
 

  
 Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
 
Fair Value Measurements at
December 31, 2021 Using

 Balance as of
December 31,
2018
 
Balance as of
December 31, 2021
Quoted Prices
in Active
Markets for
Identical
Assets
Significant
Other
Observable
Inputs
Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
Description
 (Level 1) (Level 2) (Level 3) Description(Level 1)(Level 2)(Level 3)

Assets

         Assets

Available-for-sale

         Available-for-sale

Securities of U.S. government and federal agencies

 $956 $ $956 $ Securities of U.S. government and federal agencies$13,436 $— $13,436 $— 

Securities of state and local municipalities tax exempt

 3,639  3,639  Securities of state and local municipalities tax exempt1,451 — 1,451 $— 

Securities of state and local municipalities taxable

 2,308  2,308  Securities of state and local municipalities taxable596 — 596 — 

Corporate bonds

 5,013  5,013  Corporate bonds14,151 — 14,151 — 

Certificates of deposit

 244  244  

SBA pass-through securities

 195  195  SBA pass-through securities108 — 108 — 

Mortgage-backed securities

 88,037  88,037  Mortgage-backed securities313,838 — 313,838 — 

Collateralized mortgage obligations

 23,145  23,145  Collateralized mortgage obligations14,194 — 14,194 — 

Total Available-for-Sale Securities

 $123,537 $ $123,537 $ Total Available-for-Sale Securities$357,774 $— $357,774 $— 
Derivative assets - interest rate swapsDerivative assets - interest rate swaps$6,052 $— $6,052 $— 
LiabilitiesLiabilities
Derivative liabilties - interest rate swapsDerivative liabilties - interest rate swaps$6,052 $— $6,052 $— 
Derivative liabilties - cash flow hedgeDerivative liabilties - cash flow hedge77 — 77 — 

Certain financial assets are measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis in accordance with GAAP. Adjustments to the fair value of these assets usually result from the application of lower of cost or market accounting or write-downs of individual assets.

The following describes the valuation techniques used by the Company to measure certain financial assets recorded at fair value on a nonrecurring basis in the financial statements:

Impaired Loans: Loans are designated as impaired when, in the judgment of management based on current information and events, it is probable that all amounts due according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement will not be collected. The measurement of loss associated with impaired loans can be based on either the observable market price of the loan or the fair value of the collateral. Fair value is measured based on the value of the collateral securing the loans. Collateral may be in the form of real estate or business assets including equipment, inventory, and accounts receivable. The vast majority of the collateral is real estate. The value of real estate collateral is determined utilizing a market valuation approach based on an appraisal conducted by an independent, licensed appraiser outside of the Company using observable market data (Level 2). However, if the collateral is a house or building in the process of construction, has the value derived by discounting comparable sales due to lack of similar properties, or is discounted by the Company due to marketability, then the fair value is considered Level 3. The value of business equipment is based upon an outside appraisal if deemed significant, or the net book value on the applicable business's financial statements if not considered significant using observable market data. Likewise, values for inventory and accounts receivables collateral are based on financial statement balances or aging reports (Level 3). Impaired loans allocated to the Allowance for Loan Losses are measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis. Any fair value


Table of Contents


Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(Dollars in thousands, except share and per share data)

Note 17. Fair Value Measurements (Continued)

adjustments are recorded in the period incurred as provision for loan losses on the Consolidated Statements of Income.

        Loans Held for Sale:    During the fourth quarter

103

Table of 2019, the Company reclassified a portion of its consumer unsecured loan portfolio as held for sale, and recorded a loss on the market value adjustment totaling $145 thousand. The measurement of loss associated with the loans held for sale can be based on the observable market price of the loan portfolio. Any fair value adjustments are recordedContents
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(Dollars in the period incurred as losses on loans held for sale on the Consolidated Statements of Income.

        Other Real Estate Owned:    Assets acquired through or instead of loan foreclosure are initially recorded at fair value less costs to sell when acquired, establishing a new cost basis. These assets are subsequently accounted for at lower of cost or fair value less estimated costs to sell. Fair value is commonly based on recent real estate appraisals which are updated no less frequently than annually. These appraisals may utilize a single valuation approach or a combination of approaches including comparable sales and the income approach with data from comparable properties. Adjustments are routinely made in the appraisal process by the independent appraisers to adjust for differences between the comparable sales and income data available, which results in a Level 3 classification of the inputs for determining fair value. Other real estate owned properties are evaluated regularly for impairment and adjusted accordingly.

thousands, except per share data)

The following table summarizes the Company's assets that were measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis at December 31, 20192022 and December 31, 2018:

2021:
Fair Value Measurements
Using
Balance as of
December 31, 2022
Quoted Prices
in Active
Markets for
Identical
Assets
Significant
Other
Observable
Inputs
Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
Description(Level 1)(Level 2)(Level 3)
Assets
Impaired loans
Commercial and industrial$1,233 $— $— $1,233 
Total Impaired loans$1,233 $— $— $1,233 
 
  
 Fair Value Measurements
Using
 
 
  
 Quoted Prices
in Active
Markets for
Identical
Assets
  
  
 
 
  
 Significant
Other
Observable
Inputs
  
 
 
  
 Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
 
 
 Balance as of
December 31,
2019
 
Description
 (Level 1) (Level 2) (Level 3) 

Assets

             

Impaired loans

 $1,816 $ $ $1,816 

Loans held for sale

 $11,198 $ $11,198 $ 

Other real estate owned

 $3,866 $ $ $3,866 


Fair Value Measurements
Using
Balance as of
December 31, 2021
Quoted Prices
in Active
Markets for
Identical
Assets
Significant
Other
Observable
Inputs
Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
Description(Level 1)(Level 2)(Level 3)
Assets
Impaired loans
Commercial and industrial$1,497 $— $— $1,497 
Consumer residential88 — — 88 
Total Impaired loans$1,585 $— $— $1,585 
 
  
 Fair Value Measurements
Using
 
 
  
 Quoted Prices
in Active
Markets for
Identical
Assets
  
  
 
 
  
 Significant
Other
Observable
Inputs
  
 
 
  
 Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
 
 
 Balance as of
December 31,
2018
 
Description
 (Level 1) (Level 2) (Level 3) 

Assets

             

Impaired loans

 $1,602 $ $ $1,602 

Other real estate owned

 $4,224 $ $358 $3,866 

Table of Contents


Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(Dollars in thousands, except share and per share data)

Note 17. Fair Value Measurements (Continued)

The following table displays quantitative information about Level 3 Fair Value Measurements for December 31, 20192022 and 2018:

2021:
Quantitative information about Level 3 Fair Value Measurements for December 31, 2022
AssetsFair ValueValuation Technique(s)Unobservable input
Range
(Avg.)
Impaired loans
Commercial and industrial$1,233 Discounted appraised valueMarketability/Selling costs8% - 8%8.00 %
Quantitative information about Level 3 Fair Value Measurements for December 31, 2021
AssetsFair ValueValuation Technique(s)Unobservable input
Range
(Avg.)
Impaired loans
Commercial and industrial$1,497 Discounted appraised valueMarketability/Selling costs8% - 8 %8.00 %
Consumer residential$88 Discounted appraised valueMarketability/Selling costs8% - 8%8.00 %
         Total Impaired loans$1,585 Discounted appraised valueMarketability/Selling costs8% - 8%8.00 %
104

Table of Contents
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
Quantitative information about Level 3 Fair Value Measurements for December 31, 2019
(In thousands)
Assets
 Fair Value Valuation Technique(s) Unobservable input Range (Avg.)

Impaired loans

 $1,816 Discounted appraised value Marketability/Selling costs 5% - 8% (7.84%)

Other real estate owned

 $3,866 Discounted appraised value Selling costs 10.51%


Quantitative information about Level 3 Fair Value Measurements for December 31, 2018
(In thousands)
Assets
 Fair Value Valuation Technique(s) Unobservable input Range (Avg.)

Impaired loans

 $1,602 Discounted appraised value Marketability/Selling costs 0.60% - 11% (10.89%)

Other real estate owned

 $3,866 Discounted appraised value Selling costs 10.51%

The following presents the carrying amount, fair value and placement in the fair value hierarchy of the Company's financial instruments as of December 31, 20192022 and 2018.2021. Fair values for December 31, 20192022 and 20182021 are estimated under the exit price notion in accordance with the prospective adoption of ASU 2016-01, "Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities."

Fair Value Measurements as of December 31, 2022 using
Carrying
Amount
Quoted Prices in
Active Markets
for Identical
Assets
Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
Level 1Level 2Level 3
Financial assets:    
Cash and due from banks$7,253 $7,253 $— $— 
Interest-bearing deposits at other institutions74,300 74,300 — — 
Securities held-to-maturity264 — 252 — 
Securities available-for-sale278,069 — 278,069 — 
Restricted stock15,612 — 15,612 — 
Loans, net1,824,394 — — 1,756,984 
Bank owned life insurance55,371 — 55,371 — 
Accrued interest receivable9,435 — 9,435 — 
Derivative assets - interest rate swaps4,260 — 4,260 — 
Derivative assets - cash flow hedge4,251 — 4,251 — 
Financial liabilities:
Checking, savings and money market accounts$1,321,749 $— $1,321,749 $— 
Time deposits508,413 — 510,754 — 
Fed Funds Purchased30,000 — 30,000 — 
FHLB advances235,000 — 235,000 — 
Subordinated notes19,565 — 18,856 — 
Accrued interest payable1,269 — 1,269 — 
Derivative liabilties - interest rate swaps4,260 — 4,260 — 
105

 
  
 Fair Value Measurements as of
December 31, 2019 using
 
 
  
 Quoted Prices in
Active Markets
for Identical
Assets
  
  
 
 
  
 Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
 Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
 
 
 Carrying
Amount
 
 
 Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 

Financial assets:

             

Cash and due from banks

 $14,916 $14,916 $ $ 

Interest-bearing deposits at other institutions

  18,226  18,226     

Securities held-to-maturity

  264    270   

Securities available-for-sale

  141,325    141,325   

Restricted stock

  6,017    6,017   

Loans held for sale

  11,198    11,198   

Loans, net

  1,260,295      1,254,685 

Bank owned life insurance

  37,069    37,069   

Accrued interest receivable

  4,094    4,094   

Financial liabilities:

  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
 

Checking, savings and money market accounts

 $863,383 $ $863,383 $ 

Time deposits

  422,339    424,398   

Federal funds purchased

  10,000    10,000   

FHLB advances and Subordinated notes

  15,000    15,000   

Subordinated notes

  24,487    24,564   

Accrued interest payable

  605    605   

Table of Contents


Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(Dollars in thousands, except share and per share data)

Note 17. Fair Value Measurements (Continued)



  
 Fair Value Measurements as of
December 31, 2018 using
 

  
 Quoted Prices in
Active Markets
for Identical
Assets
  
  
 

  
 Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
 Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
 Fair Value Measurements as of December 31, 2021 using

 Carrying
Amount
 
Carrying
Amount
Quoted Prices in
Active Markets
for Identical
Assets
Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
Significant
Unobservable
Inputs

 Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 1Level 2Level 3

Financial assets:

         Financial assets:

Cash and due from banks

 $9,435 $9,435 $ $ Cash and due from banks$24,613 $24,613 $— $— 

Interest-bearing deposits at other institutions

 34,060 34,060   Interest-bearing deposits at other institutions216,345 216,345 — — 

Securities held-to-maturity

 1,761  1,735  Securities held-to-maturity264 — 270 — 

Securities available-for-sale

 123,537  123,537  Securities available-for-sale357,774 — 357,774 — 

Restricted stock

 5,299  5,299  Restricted stock6,372 — 6,372 — 

Loans, net

 1,127,584   1,116,012 Loans, net1,490,020 — — 1,493,185 

Bank owned life insurance

 16,406  16,406  Bank owned life insurance39,171 — 39,171 — 

Accrued interest receivable

 4,050  4,050  Accrued interest receivable8,074 — 8,074 — 
Derivative assets - interest rate swapsDerivative assets - interest rate swaps6,052 — 6,052 — 

Financial liabilities:

         Financial liabilities:

Checking, savings and money market accounts

 $817,054 $ $817,054 $ Checking, savings and money market accounts$1,652,352 $— $1,652,352 $— 

Time deposits

 345,386  344,877  Time deposits231,417 — 232,837 — 
FHLB advancesFHLB advances25,000 — 25,000 — 

Subordinated notes

 24,407  24,515  Subordinated notes19,510 — 18,133 — 

Accrued interest payable

 811  811  Accrued interest payable1,034 — 1,034 — 
Derivative liabilties - interest rate swapsDerivative liabilties - interest rate swaps6,052 — 6,052 — 
Derivative liabilties - cash flow hedgeDerivative liabilties - cash flow hedge77 — 77 — 

Note 18.17. Earnings Per Share

Basic earnings per share (EPS)("EPS") excludes dilution and is computed by dividing net income available to common stockholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the period. Diluted earnings per share reflects the potential dilution that could occur if contracts to issue common stock were exercised or converted into common stock, or resulted in the issuance of stock which then shared in the earnings of the Company. Weighted average shares—shares – diluted includes only the potential dilution of stock options and unvested restricted stock units as of as of December 31, 20192022 and 2018,2021, respectively.

The following shows the weighted average number of shares used in computing earnings per share and the effect of weighted average number of shares of dilutive potential common stock. Dilutive potential common stock has no effect on income available to common shareholders. There were no anti-dilutive shares for each of the yearyears ended December 31, 2019. There was an average of 313 anti-dilutive shares excluded from the calculation for the year ended December 31, 2018.


Table of Contents


Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(Dollars in thousands, except share2022 and per share data)

Note 18. Earnings Per Share (Continued)

2021.

The holders of restricted stock do not share in dividends and do not have voting rights during the vesting period.

For the Years Ended
December 31,
20222021
Net income$24,984 $21,933 
Weighted average shares - basic17,431 17,062 
Effect of dilutive securities1,053 1,165 
Weighted average shares - diluted18,484 18,227 
Basic EPS$1.43 $1.29 
Diluted EPS$1.35 $1.20 
106
 
 Years Ended
December 31,
 
 
 2019 2018 

Net income

 $15,828 $10,869 

Weighted average shares—basic

  13,817  11,715 

Effect of dilutive securities

  1,008  1,107 

Weighted average shares—diluted

  14,825  12,822 

Basic EPS

 $1.15 $0.93 

Diluted EPS

 $1.07 $0.85 


Table of Contents


Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(Dollars in thousands, except share and per share data)

Note 19.18. Supplemental Cash Flow Information

For the Years Ended
December 31,
20222021
Supplemental Disclosure of Cash Flow Information:
Cash paid for:
Interest on deposits and borrowed funds$15,140 $9,361 
Income taxes6,070 4,735 
Noncash investing and financing activities:
Unrealized loss on securities available-for-sale(48,958)(5,630)
Unrealized gain on interest rate swaps4,328 677 
Right-of-use assets obtained in the exchange for lease liabilities during the current period522 207 
Modification of right-of-use assets and lease liability283 — 
 
 For the Years Ended
December 31,
 
(dollars in thousands)
 2019 2018 

Supplemental Disclosure of Cash Flow Information:

       

Cash paid for:

       

Interest on deposits and borrowed funds

 $18,698 $11,611 

Income taxes

  2,268  5,892 

Noncash investing and financing activities:

       

Transfer of loans to loans held for sale

  11,343   

Unrealized gain (loss) on securities available-for-sale

  4,096  (999)

Initial right of use asset—operating leases

  12,249   

Initial lease liability—operating leases

  12,656   

Right-of-use assets obtained in the exchange for lease liabilities during the current period

  2,378   

Noncash transactions related to acquisitions:

  
 
  
 
 

Assets acquired:

       

Interest bearing deposits

    3,829 

Investment securities available-for-sale

    12,732 

Restricted stock

    1,391 

Loans

    142,593 

Premises and equipment

    789 

Deferred tax assets, net

    4,289 

Goodwill

    6,512 

Core deposit intangible, net

    1,950 

Accrued interest receivable

    406 

Prepaid expenses

    161 

Other real estate owned (OREO)

    358 

Other assets

    638 

Liabilities assumed:

  
 
  
 
 

Non-interest bearing

    19,080 

Interest-bearing checking, savings, and money market

    48,426 

Time deposits

    70,078 

FHLB advances

    27,577 

Accrued interest payable

    294 

Other liabilities

    127 

Consideration:

  
 
  
 
 

Issuance of common stock

    14,579 

Note 20.19. Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)

Changes in accumulated other comprehensive income (AOCI)(loss) ("AOCI") for the years ended December 31, 20192022 and 20182021 are shown in the following table. The Company has two components of AOCI, which


Table of Contents


Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(Dollars in thousands, except share and per share data)

Note 20. Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) (Continued)

are available-for-sale securities and interest rate swap,cash flow hedges, for each of the yearyears ended December 31, 2019. For the year ended December 31, 2018, available-for-sale securities is the only component.

2022 and 2021.
2022
Available-for-
Sale Securities
Cash Flow
 Hedges
Total
Balance, beginning of period$(1,983)$(60)$(2,043)
Net unrealized (losses) gains during the period(37,943)3,419 (34,524)
Other comprehensive (loss) income, net of tax(37,943)3,419 (34,524)
Balance, end of period$(39,926)$3,359 $(36,567)
 
 2019 
 
 Available-for-
Sale Securities
 Cash Flow
Hedges
 Total 

Balance, beginning of period

 $(2,411)$ $(2,411)

Net unrealized gains (losses) during the period

  3,164  (63) 3,101 

Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax

  3,164  (63) 3,101 

Balance, end of period

 $753 $(63)$690 


2021
Available-for-
Sale Securities
Cash Flow
Hedges
Total
Balance, beginning of period$2,421 $(595)$1,826 
Net unrealized gains (losses) during the period(4,404)535 (3,869)
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax(4,404)535 (3,869)
Balance, end of period$(1,983)$(60)$(2,043)
 
 2018 
 
 Available-for-
Sale Securities
 

Balance, beginning of period

 $(1,693)

Net unrealized gains (losses) during the period

  (1,072)

Net reclassification adjustment for losses (gains) realized in income

  354 

Other comprehensive loss, net of tax

  (718)

Balance, end of period

 $(2,411)

        The following table presents information related toThere were no reclassifications from accumulated other comprehensive income.

income (loss) related to realized gains or losses for both of the years ended December 31, 2022, and 2021, respectively.
 
 Amount
Reclassified
from AOCI
into Income
  
 
 For the Years
Ended
December 31,
  
 
 Affected Line Item in the Consolidated
Statements of Income
Details about AOCI
 2019 2018

Losses on sale of available-for-sale securities

 $ $462 Loss on sale of securities available-for-sale

Income tax benefit

    (108)Income tax benefit

Total

 $ $354 Net of tax

Note 21.20. Revenue Recognition

        On January 1, 2018, the

The Company adoptedrecognizes revenue in accordance with ASU No. 2014-09 "Revenue from Contracts with Customers" (Topic 606) and all subsequent ASUs that modified Topic 606. 606 in recognizing revenue.
Topic 606 does not apply to revenue associated with financial instruments, including revenue from loans and securities. In addition, certain noninterest income streams such as fees associated with mortgage servicing rights, gain on sale of securities, BOLIbank owned life insurance income, financial guarantees, derivatives, and certain credit card fees are also not in scope of the new guidance. Topic 606 is applicable to noninterest revenue streams such as trust and asset management income, deposit related fees, interchange fees, merchant income, and insurance

commissions. However, the

107


Table of Contents


Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(Dollars in thousands, except share and per share data)

Note 21. Revenue Recognition (Continued)

commissions. However, the

recognition of these revenue streams did not change significantly upon adoption of Topic 606. Substantially all of the Company's revenue is generated from contracts with customers. Noninterest revenue streams in-scope of Topic 606 are discussed below.

Service Charges on Deposit Accounts

Service charges on deposit accounts consist of account analysis fees (i.e., net fees earned on analyzed business and personal checking accounts), monthly service fees, check orders, and other deposit account related fees. The Company's performance obligation for account analysis fees and monthly service fees is generally satisfied, and the related revenue recognized, over the period in which the service is provided. Check orders and other deposit account related fees are largely transactional based, and therefore, the Company's performance obligation is satisfied, and related revenue recognized, at a point in time. Payment for service charges on deposit accounts is primarily received immediately or in the following month through a direct charge to customers' accounts.

Fees, Exchange and Other Service Charges

Fees, exchange, and other service charges are primarily comprised of debit and credit card income, ATM fees, merchant services income, and other service charges and are included in other income on our consolidated statements of income. Debit and credit card income is primarily comprised of interchange fees earned whenever the Company's debit and credit cards are processed through card payment networks such as Visa. ATM fees are primarily generated when a Company cardholder uses a non-Company ATM or a non-Company cardholder uses a Company ATM. Merchant services income mainly represents fees charged to merchants to process their debit and credit card transactions, in addition to account management fees. Other service charges include revenue from processing wire transfers, bill pay service, cashier's checks, and other services. The Company's performance obligation for fees, exchange, and other service charges are largely satisfied, and related revenue recognized, when the services are rendered or upon completion. Payment is typically received immediately or in the following month. This income is reflected in other income on the Company's consolidated statements of income.

Other Income

Other noninterest income consists of loan swap fees, insurance commissions, and other miscellaneous revenue streams not meeting the criteria above. When the Company enters into an interest rate swap agreement, the Company may receive an additional one-time payment fee which is recognized as income when received. The Company receives monthly recurring commissions based on a percentage of premiums issued and revenue is recognized when received. Any residual miscellaneous fees are recognized as they occur, and therefore, the Company determined this consistent practice satisfies the obligation for performance.


Table of Contents


Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(Dollars in thousands, except share and per share data)

Note 21. Revenue Recognition (Continued)

The following presents noninterest income, segregated by revenue streams in-scope and out-of-scope of Topic 606, for the years ended December 31, 20192022 and 2018:

2021:
Years Ended December 31,
20222021
Noninterest Income
In-scope of Topic 606
Service Charges on Deposit Accounts$954 $1,028 
Fees, Exchange, and Other Service Charges374 369 
Other income104 191 
Noninterest Income (in-scope of Topic 606)1,432 1,588 
Noninterest Income (out-scope of Topic 606)1,402 2,714 
Total Noninterest Income$2,834 $4,302 
 
 Years Ended
December 31,
 
 
 2019 2018 

Noninterest Income

       

In-scope of Topic 606

       

Service Charges on Deposit Accounts

 $890 $635 

Fees, Exchange, and Other Service Charges

  429  284 

Other income

  38  27 

Noninterest Income (in-scope of Topic 606)

  1,357  946 

Noninterest Income (out-scope of Topic 606)

  1,189  715 

Total Noninterest Income

 $2,546 $1,661 

Contract Balances

A contract asset balance occurs when an entity performs a service for a customer before the customer pays consideration (resulting in a contract receivable) or before payment is due (resulting in a contract asset). A contract liability
108

Table of Contents
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
balance is an entity's obligation to transfer a service to a customer for which the entity has already received payment (or payment is due) from the customer. The Company's noninterest revenue streams are largely based on transactional activity. Consideration is often received immediately or shortly after the Company satisfies its performance obligation and revenue is recognized. The Company does not typically enter into long-term revenue contracts with customers, and therefore, does not experience significant contract balances. As of December 31, 20192022 and 2018,2021, the Company did not have any significant contract balances.

Contract Acquisition Costs

        In connection with the adoption of

Under Topic 606, an entity is required to capitalize, and subsequently amortize into expense, certain incremental costs of obtaining a contract with a customer if these costs are expected to be recovered. The incremental costs of obtaining a contract are those costs that an entity incurs to obtain a contract with a customer that it would not have incurred if the contract had not been obtained (for example, sales commission). The Company utilizes the practical expedient which allows entities to immediately expense contract acquisition costs when the asset that would have resulted from capitalizing these costs would have been amortized in one year or less. The Company did not capitalize any contract acquisition cost during the years ended December 31, 20192022 or 2018.

2021.

TableGain on sale of Contents


Notesother real estate owned

The Company records a gain/loss from the sale of other real estate owned when control of the property transfers to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(Dollarsthe buyer, which generally occurs at the time of an executed deed. When the Company finances the sale of the property to a buyer, the Company assesses whether the buyer is committed to perform the obligations under the contract and whether collectability of the transaction price is probable. In determining the gain (loss) on the sale, the Company adjusts the transaction price and the related gain or loss on sale if a significant financing component is present. The Company recorded a gain on sale of other real estate owned of $0 in thousands, except share2022 and per share data)

$236 thousand in 2021. Gain on sale of other real estate owned is reflected in the consolidated statements of income under Noninterest Expense and is not reflected in the table above.

Note 22.21. Parent Company Only Financial Statements

The FVCBankcorp, Inc. (Parent Company only) condensed financial statements are as follows:


PARENT COMPANY ONLY CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF CONDITION
December 31, 20192022 and 2018

2021
Assets20222021
Cash and cash equivalents$531 $1,882 
Securities available-for-sale991 1,005 
Investment in subsidiary214,382 223,043 
Other assets6,404 3,903 
Total assets$222,308 $229,833 
Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity
Subordinated notes$19,565 $19,510 
Other liabilities361 527 
Total liabilities$19,926 $20,037 
Total stockholders' equity$202,382 $209,796 
Total liabilities and stockholders' equity$222,308 $229,833 




109

Table of Contents
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
 
 2019 2018 

Assets

       

Cash and cash equivalents

 $5,421 $6,252 

Securities available-for-sale

  1,040  988 

Investment in subsidiary

  194,914  173,873 

Other assets

  2,246  1,682 

Total assets

 $203,621 $182,795 

Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity

       

Subordinated notes

 $24,487 $24,407 

Other liabilities

  56  52 

Total liabilities

 $24,543 $24,459 

Total stockholders' equity

 $179,078 $158,336 

Total liabilities and stockholders' equity

 $203,621 $182,795 


PARENT COMPANY ONLY CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
For the Years Ended December 31, 20192022 and 2018

2021
20222021
Income:  
Interest on securities available-for-sale$67 $65 
Income from minority membership interest626 — 
Dividend income730 20,820 
Total income$1,423 $20,885 
Expense:
Interest on subordinated notes$1,031 $2,534 
Salaries and employee benefits1,192 1,021 
Occupancy and equipment80 83 
Audit, legal and consulting fees375 320 
Other operating expenses194 249 
Total expense$2,872 $4,207 
Net income (loss) before income tax benefit and equity in undistributed earnings of subsidiary$(1,449)$16,678 
Income tax benefit(580)(879)
Equity in undistributed earnings of subsidiary25,853 4,376 
Net income$24,984 $21,933 
 
 2019 2018 

Income:

       

Interest on securities available-for-sale

 $65 $65 

Total income

 $65 $65 

Expense:

       

Interest on subordinated notes

  (1,580) (1,580)

Salaries and employee benefits

  (687) (715)

Occupancy and equipment

  (80) (80)

Audit, legal and consulting fees

  (322) (225)

Merger expenses

    (781)

Other operating expenses

  (194) (128)

Total expense

  (2,863) (3,509)

Net loss before income tax benefit and equity in undistributed

       

earnings of subsidiary

 $(2,798)$(3,444)

Income tax benefit

  (560) (835)

Equity in undistributed earnings of subsidiary

  18,066  13,478 

Net income

 $15,828 $10,869 


Table of Contents


Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(Dollars in thousands, except share and per share data)

Note 22. Parent Company Only Financial Statements (Continued)


PARENT COMPANY ONLY CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

For The Years Ended December 31, 20192022 and 2018

2021
20222021
Cash Flows From Operating Activities
Net income$24,984 $21,933 
Equity in undistributed earnings of subsidiary(25,853)(4,376)
Amortization of subordinated debt issuance costs55 488 
Stock-based compensation expense1,183 1,011 
Change in other assets and liabilities(1,413)(2,598)
Net cash (used in) provided by operating activities$(1,044)$16,458 
Cash Flows From Investing Activities
Net cash used in investing activities$— $— 
Cash Flows From Financing Activities
Repayment of subordinated notes, net$(1,250)$(23,813)
Repurchase of shares of common stock(730)— 
Common stock issuance1,673 1,221 
Net cash used in financing activities$(307)$(22,592)
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents$(1,351)$(6,134)
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of year1,882 8,016 
Cash and cash equivalents, end of year$531 $1,882 
110
 
 2019 2018 

Cash Flows From Operating Activities

       

Net income

 $15,828 $10,869 

Equity in undistributed earnings of subsidiary

  (18,066) (13,478)

Deferred income tax (benefit) expense

  (44) 111 

Amortization of subordinated debt issuance costs

  80  80 

Stock-based compensation expense

  679  707 

Change in other assets and liabilities

  (528) (806)

Net cash used in operating activities

 $(2,051)$(2,517)

Cash Flows From Investing Activities

       

Cash acquired in acquision, net

 $ $5,172 

Cash contributed to banking subsidiary

    (33,473)

Net cash used in investing activities

 $ $(28,301)

Cash Flows From Financing Activities

       

Stock options exercised

 $1,220 $1,141 

Common stock issuance

    33,475 

Net cash provided by financing activities

 $1,220 $34,616 

Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents

 $(831)$3,798 

Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of year

  6,252  2,454 

Cash and cash equivalents, end of year

 $5,421 $6,252 


Table of Contents

Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure

No changes in the Company's independent registered public accounting firm or disagreements on accounting and financial disclosure required to be reported hereunder have taken place.

Item 9A. Controls and Procedures

Disclosure Controls and Procedures

     ��  

The Company maintains disclosure controls and procedures that are designed to provide assurance that information required to be disclosed by the Company in the reports that it files or submits under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods required by the Securities and Exchange Commission and that such information is accumulated and communicated to the Company's management including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. An evaluation of the effectiveness of the design and operation of the Company's disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report was carried out under the supervision and with the participation of management, including the Company's Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer. Based on the evaluation, the aforementioned officers concluded that the Company's disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of the end of such period.

Management's Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting

Management of the Company is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. The Company's internal control over financial reporting is designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of the Company's financial reporting and the preparation of published financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles.

Management assessed the effectiveness of the Company's internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2019.2022. In making this assessment, management used the 2013 criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO)("COSO") inInternal Control-Integrated Framework. Based on management's assessment, management believes that as of December 31, 2019,2021, the Company's internal control over financial reporting was effective based on criteria set forth by COSO in its 2013Internal Control-Integrated Framework.

The Company's annual report does not include an attestation report of the Company's independent registered public accounting firm, Yount, Hyde & Barbour. P.C. (YHB)("YHB", Auditor Firm ID: 613), regarding internal control over financial reporting.reporting under Public Company Accounting Oversight Board standards. Management's report was not subject to attestation by YHB pursuant to rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission that permit the Company to provide only management's report in its annual report.

The 20192022 consolidated financial statements have been audited by the independent registered public accounting firm of Yount, Hyde & Barbour, P.C. (YHB).YHB. Personnel from YHB were given unrestricted access to all financial records and related data, including minutes of all meetings of the Board of Directors and Committees thereof. Management believes that all representations made to the independent registered public accounting firm were valid and appropriate. The resulting report from YHB accompanies the consolidated financial statements.

Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

There was no change in the Company's internal control over financial reporting identified in connection with the evaluation of internal controls that occurred during the fourth quarter of 20192022 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company's internal control over financial reporting.

Item 9B. Other Information

None.


111


Table of Contents

Item 9C. Disclosure Regarding Foreign Jurisdictions that Prevent Inspection
None.
112

Table of Contents
PART III

Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance

Pursuant to General Instruction G(3) of Form 10-K, the information contained inunder the captions "Election of Directors" section and under the headingsDirectors," "Executive Officers," "The Committees"Ownership of theCompany Securities – Delinquent Section 16(a) Reports" and "Corporate Governance and The Board of Directors," "Code of Ethics," and "Delinquent Section 16(a) Reports"Directors" in the Company's Proxy Statement for the 20202023 Annual Meeting of StockholdersShareholders is incorporated by reference.

Item 11. Executive Compensation

Pursuant to General Instruction G(3) of Form 10-K, the information contained in the "Executive Compensation" section and under the headings "Directorcaptions "Executive Compensation," "Corporate Governance and The Board of Directors – Director Compensation" and "Corporate Governance and The Board of Directors – "Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation" in the Company's Proxy Statement for the 20202023 Annual Meeting of StockholdersShareholders is incorporated by reference.

Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters

Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management. Pursuant to General Instruction G(3) of Form 10-K, the information contained under the headings "Securitycaption "Ownership of Company Securities - Security Ownership of Directors, Executive Officers and Officers" and "Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners" in the Company's Proxy Statement for the 20202023 Annual Meeting of StockholdersShareholders is incorporated by reference.

Equity Compensation Plan Information. The following table sets forth information as of December 31, 2019,2022, with respect to compensation plans under which shares of our Common Stock are authorized for issuance.

Plan Category
 Number of Securities to Be
Issued Upon Exercise of
Outstanding Options,
Warrants and Rights
 Weighted Average
Exercise Price of
Outstanding Options,
Warrants and Rights
 Number of Securities
Remaining Available
for Future Issuance
Under Equity
Compensation Plans(1)
 

Equity Compensation Plans Approved by Stockholders:

          

Amended and Restated 2008 Stock Plan

  1,797,516 $8.09  164,195 

Equity Compensation Plans Not Approved by Stockholders(2)

       

Total

  1,797,516 $8.09  164,195 

Plan CategoryNumber of Securities to Be
Issued Upon Exercise of
Outstanding Options,
Warrants and Rights
Weighted Average
Exercise Price of
Outstanding Options,
Warrants and Rights
Number of Securities
Remaining Available
for Future Issuance
Under Equity
Compensation Plans(1)
Equity Compensation Plans Approved by Stockholders:
Amended and Restated 2008 Stock Plan1,621,920$6.82 157,263
Equity Compensation Plans Not Approved by Stockholders (2)— 
Total1,621,920$6.82 157,263
________________________
(1)
Amounts exclude any securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options, warrants and rights.

(2)
The Company does not have any equity compensation plans that have not been approved by stockholders.

Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence

Pursuant to General Instruction G(3) of Form 10-K, the information contained under the heading "Certaincaptions "Executive Compensation – Certain Relationships and Related Transactions" and "Independence"Corporate Governance and The Board of the Directors"Directors – Director Independence" in the Company's Proxy Statement for the 20202023 Annual Meeting of StockholdersShareholders is incorporated by reference.


Table of Contents

Item 14. Principal AccountingAccountant Fees and Services

Pursuant to General Instruction G(3) of Form 10-K, the information contained under the heading "Feescaptions "Audit information – Fees of Independent Registered Public Accountants" and "Audit Information – Audit Committee Pre-Approval Policies and Procedures" in the Company's Proxy Statement for the 20202023 Annual Meeting of StockholdersShareholders is incorporated by reference.

113

Table of Contents

Item 15. ExhibitsExhibit and Financial Statement Schedules

(a)
Exhibits
(a)Exhibits
NumberDescription
Number3.1Description
3.1

3.2

3.2



3.3

3.3



4.1

4.1



4.2

10.1

4.3
10.1

10.2

10.2


10.3
10.4

10.5

10.3

10.6
10.7

10.8

10.4


Form of Subordinated Note due June 30, 2026(1)


10.5



10.9

10.6



21

21



23.1

23.1



31.1

31.1



31.2

31.2



32.1

32.1



32.2

32.2



101

101


Interactive data files pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-T



(i)

(i)


Consolidated Statements of Condition at December 31, 20192022 and 20182021



(ii)

(ii)


Consolidated Statement of Income for the years ended December 31, 20192022 and 20182021



(iii)

(iii)


Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Income for the years ended December 31, 20192022 and 20182021
114




(iv)

(iv)


Consolidated Statement of Changes in Stockholders' Equity for the years ended December 31, 20192022 and 20182021



(v)

(v)


Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, 20192022 and 20182021



(vi)

(vi)


Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
104The cover page from the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2022, formatted in Inline Extensible Business Reporting Language (included with Exhibit 101).

(1)
Incorporated by reference to the Exhibit of the same number to FVCB's Registration Statement onItem 16. Form S-1 filed on August 20, 2018 (Registration No. 333-226942).
10-K Summary

None.

115

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 and 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

FVCBankcorp, Inc.

March 27, 2020


By:


/s/ DAVID W. PIJOR

FVCBankcorp, Inc.
March 24, 2023By:Name:/s/ David W. Pijor
Name:David W. Pijor
Title:Title:Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities indicated on March 27, 2020.

24, 2023.
Signatures
Titles



SignaturesTitles
/s/ DAVID W. PIJOR

Name: David W. Pijor
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)

Name: David W. Pijor
/s/ JENNIFER L. DEACON

Name: Jennifer L. Deacon


Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)

/s/ PATRICIA A. FERRICK

Name: Patricia A. Ferrick


President and DirectorJennifer L. Deacon

/s/ MORTON A. BENDER

Name: Morton A. Bender


Director

/s/ L. BURWEL GUNN

Name: L. Burwell Gunn


Director

/s/ SCOTT LAUGHLIN

Name: Scott Laughlin


Director

/s/ THOMAS L. PATTERSON

Name: Thomas L. Patterson


Director

Table of Contents

Signatures
Titles

/s/ Patricia A. Ferrick


President and Director
Name: Patricia A. Ferrick
/s/ DEVIN SATZ

Marc N. Duber
Director
Name: Marc N. Duber
/s/ L. Burwell GunnDirector
Name: L. Burwell Gunn
/s/ Meena KrishnanDirector
Name: Meena Krishnan
/s/ Scott LaughlinDirector
Name: Scott Laughlin
/s/ Thomas L. PattersonDirector
Name: Thomas L. Patterson
/s/ Devin SatzDirector
Name: Devin SatzDirector

/s/ LAWRENCELawrence W. SCHWARTZ

Schwartz
Director
Name: Lawrence W. Schwartz

Director

/s/ SIDNEYSidney G. SIMMONDS

Simmonds
Director
Name: Sidney G. Simmonds

Director

/s/ DANIELDaniel M. TESTA

Testa
Director
Name: Daniel M. Testa

Director

/s/ PHILIPPhilip R. WILLS

Wills III
Director
Name: Philip R. Wills III

Director

/s/ STEVENSteven M. WILTSE

Wiltse
Director
Name: Steven M. Wiltse

Director

116