SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-K
FOR ANNUAL AND TRANSITION REPORTS
PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
(Mark One)
☒ Annual Report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 for the fiscal year ended December 31, 20192020 or
☐ Transition report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 for the transition period from to
| Commission File Number | Registrant, State of Incorporation Address, Zip Code and Telephone Number | IRS Employer Identification No. | |||||||||||||||||||||
| 001-14431 | American States Water Company | 95-4676679 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Incorporated in | California | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| 630 E. Foothill Boulevard, | San Dimas | CA | 91773-1212 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| (909) | 394-3600 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Golden State Water Company | 95-1243678 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Incorporated in | California | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| 630 E. Foothill Boulevard, | San Dimas | CA | 91773-1212 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| (909) | 394-3600 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
| Title of Each Class | Trading Symbol | Name of Each Exchange on Which Registered | ||||||
| American States Water Company Common Shares | AWR | New York Stock Exchange | ||||||
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None
Indicate by check mark if the Registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.
| American States Water Company | Yes | ☒ | No | ☐ | |||||||||||||||||||
| Golden State Water Company | Yes | ☐ | No | ☒ | |||||||||||||||||||
Indicate by check mark if the Registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act.
| American States Water Company | Yes | ☐ | No | ☒ | |||||||||||||||||||
| Golden State Water Company | Yes | ☐ | No | ☒ | |||||||||||||||||||
Indicate by check mark whether Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
| American States Water Company | Yes | ☒ | No | ☐ | |||||||||||||||||||
| Golden State Water Company | Yes | ☒ | No | ☐ | |||||||||||||||||||
Indicate by check mark whether Registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or such shorter period that the Registrant was required to submit and post such files).
| American States Water Company | Yes | ☒ | No | ☐ | |||||||||||||||||||
| Golden State Water Company | Yes | ☒ | No | ☐ | |||||||||||||||||||
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definition of “large accelerated filer”, “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
| American States Water Company | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Large accelerated filer | ☒ | Accelerated filer | ☐ | Non-accelerated filer | ☐ | Smaller reporting company | ☐ | Emerging growth company | ☐ | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Golden States Water Company | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Large accelerated filer | ☐ | Accelerated filer | ☐ | Non-accelerated filer | ☒ | Smaller reporting company | ☐ | Emerging growth company | ☐ | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act.¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed a report on and attestation to its management's assessment of the effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting under Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (15 U.S.C. 7262(b)) by the registered public accounting firm that prepared or issued its audit report.☒
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act)
| American States Water Company | Yes | ☐ | No | ☒ | |||||||||||||||||||
| Golden State Water Company | Yes | ☐ | No | ☒ | |||||||||||||||||||
The aggregate market value of all voting Common Shares held by non-affiliates of American States Water Company was approximately $2,771,217,000$2,900,179,000 and $3,325,833,000$2,876,954,000 on June 30, 20192020 and February 20, 2020,19, 2021, respectively. The closing price per Common Share of American States Water Company on February 20, 2020,19, 2021, as traded on the New York Stock Exchange, was $90.23.$77.97. As of February 20, 2020,19, 2021, the number of Common Shares of American States Water Company outstanding was 36,859,505.36,898,213. As of that same date, American States Water Company owned all 165170 outstanding Common Shares of Golden State Water Company. The aggregate market value of all voting stock held by non-affiliates of Golden State Water Company was zero0 on June 30, 20192020 and February 20, 2020.19, 2021.
Golden State Water Company meets the conditions set forth in General Instruction I(1)(a) and (b) of Form 10-K and is therefore filing this Form, in part, with the reduced disclosure format for Golden State Water Company.
Documents Incorporated by Reference:
Portions of the Proxy Statement of American States Water Company will be subsequently filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission as to Part III, Item Nos. 10, 11, 13 and 14 and portions of Item 12, in each case as specifically referenced herein.
| Item 16. | Form 10-K Summary | ||||||||||
2
PART I
Item 1. Business
This annual report on Form 10-K is a combined report being filed by two separate Registrants, American States Water Company (“AWR”) and Golden State Water Company (“GSWC”). References in this report to “Registrant” are to AWR and GSWC, collectively, unless otherwise specified. GSWC makes no representations as to the information contained in this report relating to AWR and its subsidiaries, other than GSWC.
AWR makes its periodic reports, Form 10-Q and Form 10-K, and current reports, Form 8-K, available free of charge through its website, www.aswater.com, as soon as material is electronically filed with or furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). Such reports are also available on the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov. AWR also makes available free of charge its code of business conduct and ethics, its corporate governance guidelines and the charters of its Nominating and Governance Committee, Compensation Committee and Audit and Finance Committee through its website or by calling (877) 463-6297. AWR and GSWC have filed the certification of officers required by Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act as Exhibits 31.1 and 31.2 to its Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2019.2020.
Overview
AWR is the parent company of GSWC, Bear Valley Electric Service, Inc. ("BVESI") and American States Utility Services, Inc. (“ASUS”) (and its wholly owned subsidiaries: Fort Bliss Water Services Company (“FBWS”), Terrapin Utility Services, Inc. (“TUS”), Old Dominion Utility Services, Inc. (“ODUS”), Palmetto State Utility Services, Inc. (“PSUS”), Old North Utility Services, Inc. (“ONUS”), Emerald Coast Utility Services, Inc. (“ECUS”) and Fort Riley Utility Services, Inc. (“FRUS”)). On July 1, 2020, GSWC completed the transfer of the electric utility assets and liabilities from its electric division to BVESI, in exchange for common shares of BVESI.GSWC then immediately distributed all of BVESI's common shares to AWR, was incorporated as a California corporationwhereupon BVESI became wholly owned directly by AWR. This reorganization did not result in 1998 as a holding company. any substantive changes to AWR's operations and business segments.
AWR has three reportable segments: water, electric and contracted services. Within the segments, AWR has twothree principal business units, water and electric service utility operations conducted through its regulated utilities GSWC and BVESI, respectively, and contracted services conducted through ASUS and its subsidiaries. FBWS, TUS, ODUS, PSUS, ONUS, ECUS and FRUS may be referred to herein collectively as the “Military Utility Privatization Subsidiaries.”
GSWC is a public water utility engaged principally in the purchase, production, distribution and sale of water in 10 counties in the State of California. GSWC is regulated by the California Public Utilities Commission (“CPUC”). It was incorporated asBVESI is a California corporation on December 31, 1929. GSWC alsopublic electric utility that distributes electricity in several San Bernardino County mountain communities in California, through its Bear Valley Electric Service (“BVES”) division.and is also regulated by the CPUC. Additional information regarding public utility regulation is discussed in Item 7. "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition" and Results of Operation" under the section titled "Regulatory Matters."
ASUS, itself or through the Military Utility Privatization Subsidiaries, has contracted with the U.S. government to provide water and/or wastewater services at various military installations. ASUS operates, maintains and performs construction activities (including renewal and replacement capital work) on water and/or wastewater systems at various U.S. military bases pursuant to 50-year firm, fixed-price contracts. Each of the contracts with the U.S. government is subject to termination, in whole or in part, prior to the end of its 50-year term for convenience of the U.S. government or as a result of default or nonperformance by the ASUS subsidiary performing the contract. The contract price for each of these contracts is subject to annual economic price adjustments. Contracts are also subject to modifications for changes in circumstances, changes in laws and regulations, and additions to the contract value for new construction of facilities at the military bases. AWR guarantees performance of ASUS’s military privatization contracts.
3
Pursuant to the terms of these contracts, the Military Utility Privatization Subsidiaries operate the following water and wastewater systems:
| Subsidiary | Military Base | Type of System | Location | |||||||||||||||||
| FBWS | Fort Bliss | Water and Wastewater | Texas and New Mexico | |||||||||||||||||
| TUS | Joint Base Andrews | Water and Wastewater | Maryland | |||||||||||||||||
| ODUS | Fort Lee | Wastewater | Virginia | |||||||||||||||||
| ODUS | Joint-Base Langley Eustis and Joint Expeditionary Base Little Creek-Fort Story | Water and Wastewater | Virginia | |||||||||||||||||
| PSUS | Fort Jackson | Water and Wastewater | South Carolina | |||||||||||||||||
| ONUS | Fort Bragg, Pope Army Airfield and Camp Mackall | Water and Wastewater | North Carolina | |||||||||||||||||
| ECUS | Eglin Air Force Base | Water and Wastewater | Florida | |||||||||||||||||
| FRUS | Fort Riley | Water and Wastewater Collection and Treatment | Kansas | |||||||||||||||||
Certain financial information for each of AWR’s business segments - water distribution, electric distribution, and contracted services - is set forth in Note 17 to the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements of American States Water Company and its subsidiaries. While AWR’s water and electric utility segments are not dependent upon a single or only a few customers, the U.S. government is the primary customer for ASUS’s contracted services. ASUS, from time to time, performs work at military bases for other prime contractors of the U.S. government.
Seasonality
The demand for water and electricity varies by season. For instance, there can be a higher level of water consumption during the third quarter of each year when weather in California tends to be hot and dry. During unusually wet weather, our customers generally use less water. The CPUC has adopted regulatory mechanisms that help mitigate fluctuations in revenues due to changes in water consumption by our customers in California.
The demand for electricity in our electric customer service area is greatly affected by winter snow levels. An increase in winter snow levels reduces the use of snowmaking machines at ski resorts in the Big Bear area and, as a result, reduces our electric revenues. Likewise, unseasonably warm weather during a skiing season may result in temperatures too high for snowmaking conditions, which also reduces our electric revenues. The CPUC has also adopted regulatory mechanisms for our electric business, which helps mitigate fluctuations in the revenues of our electric business due to changes in the amount of electricity used by BVESI’s customers.
Environmental Regulation
The regulated utilities spent approximately $20.6 million in 2020 and expects to spend approximately $22.9 million in 2021 for capital expenditures on environmental control facilities. In addition, various other capital expenditures are incurred for purposes other than environmental control facilities, but may also have some environmental benefits. An environmental control facility is any facility that is reasonably expected to abate, reduce or aid in the prevention, measurement, control of monitoring of noise, air or water pollutants, solid waste, thermal pollution, radiation or other pollutants.
Environmental matters and compliance with such laws and regulations are discussed in detailfurther in Item 7. “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operation” under the section titled “Environmental Matters.“Environmental Matters.”
4
Climate Change
Climate change impacts both GSWC’s water supply and the need to consider investing in additional infrastructure, such as desalination projects, reclaimed water projects, groundwater storage projects or additional pipelines to connect to alternative sources of supply. Climate change has also resulted in reductions in customer usage as a result of installation of water-saving devices by customers, changes in landscaping to more drought resistant plants, and reduced water usage by customers to comply with drought restrictions. In addition, GSWC faces competition primarily from governmental entities who are able to supply, through GSWC, reclaimed or recycled water to GSWC customers, in lieu of GSWC supplying potable water to these customers. Additional information on GSWC’s water supplies is discussed further in Item 7. “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operation” under the section titled “Water Supplies.”
Climate change has also impacted electric utilities in California due to an increase in wildfires. As a result of legislation adopted in 2018, BVESI is required to submit wildfire mitigation plans to the CPUC. Compliance with the plans will result in an increase in capital expenditures for wildfire mitigation projects. BVESI will not be able to recover the costs incurred to make capital improvements included in BVESI’s current wildfire mitigation plans from ratepayers until the CPUC approves recovery of these costs in its next general rate case filing, which will set new rates beginning in 2023. Power supplies may also become more constrained and more expensive due to regulation of power plants using fossil fuels.
Both GSWC and BVESI must comply with regulations relating to the emission of greenhouse gases. BVESI must also comply with California’s renewable energy requirements.
Additional information regarding compliance with laws and regulations addressing climate change issues is provided in Item 7. “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operation” under the section titled “Climate Change.”
COVID-19
GSWC, BVESI, and ASUS have continued their operations given that their water, wastewater, and electric utility services are deemed essential. The response of GSWC and BVESI to COVID-19 has included: (i) suspending service disconnections for nonpayment pursuant to CPUC orders; (ii) increasing the allowance for doubtful accounts to reflect the higher levels of customer balances past due, (iii) establishing memorandum accounts to track incremental expenses related to COVID-19, including bad debt expense, in order to file for future recovery of these expenses, (iv) increasing the number of employees telecommuting; and (v) delaying some capital improvement projects at the water segment. The COVID-19 pandemic has also caused significant volatility in financial markets, which could continue.The continued economic impact could adversely impact the value of GSWC’s pension and retirement plan assets due to possible declines in security prices.
Additional information regarding the impact of COVID-19 on GSWC and BVESI is provided in Item 7. “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operation” under the section titled “COVID-19.”
Competition
The businesses of GSWC and BVESI are substantially free from direct and indirect competition with other public utilities, municipalities and other public agencies within their existing service territories. However, GSWC and BVESI may be subject to eminent domain proceedings in which governmental agencies, under state law, may acquire GSWC’s water systems or BVESI's electric system if doing so is necessary and in the public’s interest. GSWC competes with governmental agencies and other investor-owned utilities in connection with offering service to new real estate developments on the basis of financial terms, availability of water and ability to commence providing service on a timely basis. ASUS actively competes for business with other investor-owned utilities, other third-party providers of water and/or wastewater services, and governmental entities primarily on the basis of quality of service and price.
AWR Workforce
AWR and its subsidiaries had a total of 841 employees as of December 31, 2019.2020. GSWC had 560525 employees as of December 31, 2019. Seventeen2020. BVESI had 43 employees, sixteen of BVESwhich are covered by a collective bargaining agreement with the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, which expires in December 2020.
2025. All of the employees of GSWC and BVESI are located in California. ASUS and its subsidiaries had 281a total of 273 employees as of December 31, 2019. Sixteen2020. Thirteen of FBWS's employees are covered by a collective bargaining agreement with the International Union of Operating Engineers. This agreement expires in September 2022.
Our business requires a combination of complex infrastructure, regulation and customer service. Ongoing development of our talent across the organization to meet critical business needs is a continual focus, and includes (i) building a culture such that high-potential talent is identified and further developed, (ii) creating career paths that not only move up a
5
specialized ladder, but across the organization, and (iii) offering opportunities for employees to accept new challenges through stretch assignments.
Attracting Diverse Candidates
We understand that strength comes from having a diverse employee population. We strive to hire from our local communities and have a workforce that is representative, at all job levels, of the communities we serve. This begins with the recruitment process. We strive to have all aspects of employment, including the decision to hire, promote, discipline, or discharge, be based on merit, competence, performance, and business needs. It is our policy not to discriminate on the basis of race, color, religion, marital status, age, national origin, ancestry, physical or mental disability, medical condition, pregnancy, genetic information, gender, sexual orientation, gender identity or expression, veteran status, or any other status protected under federal, state, or local law.
Safety and Training
Strong Occupational Health and Safety practices reduce injuries, keep our workforce healthy, and reduce operating costs. A safe workforce translates into better performance company-wide. We work to create a safety-focused culture in which each individual feels personally responsible for their own safety, the safety of their co-workers, as well as the safety of the communities they serve. Safety performance is included as a metric in the officer and manager compensation programs. Employees attend training in various mandated safety programs that are applicable to their operations. In addition, there are regulatory safety training requirements as well as training requirements for the Department of Transportation and training requirements for compliance with local, state, and federal environmental laws.
To reinforce our safety efforts and protocols, company-wide safety inspections at GSWC and BVESI are conducted with supervisors. The inspection reports are forwarded to management for review, allocation of resources are made (if needed), and corrective actions are taken. ASUS has a dedicated Safety Coordinator located at each military base installation served. The onsite Safety Coordinator provides regulatory compliance, as well as beneficial health and safety monitoring functions.
Learning and Development
Compliance training is required each year, for each employee. Other types of training are offered on an optional basis. Examples of optional programs include ongoing water operations competencies and education, supervisor development, knowledge capture and management, feedback and measurements to show the value of learning solutions, and administrative oversight for various business competencies relative to mandated training and compliance requirements. We pay for approved external business-related seminars and workshops. Certain positions require employees to maintain all of their job-specific certifications, licenses and continuing education credits.
On a regular and ongoing basis, we require all employees to certify that they have reviewed and understand our Code of Conduct as well as our Employee Handbook. We provide harassment and prevention awareness training for all employees.
Succession Planning
On an annual basis, our senior management team completes a roadmap for improving human capital management by developing succession plans with the goal of achieving the most efficient alignment of resources and talent to meet business needs. This includes identifying key succession positions and potential successors for top-level positions, such as Vice Presidents, for the next ten years.
Recruiting, developing and retaining the right talent is key to our long-term success. With 28% of our employees eligible for retirement in the next five years, we are focused on transferring institutional knowledge, continue succession planning and pursue recruitment and development strategies to attract qualified talent.
Forward-Looking Information
This Form 10-K and the documents incorporated herein contain forward-looking statements intended to qualify for the “safe harbor” from liability established by the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Forward-looking statements are based on current estimates, expectations and projections about future events and assumptions regarding these events and include statements regarding management’s goals, beliefs, plans or current expectations, consideringtaking into account the information currently available to management. Forward-looking statements are not statements of historical facts. For example, when we use words such as “anticipate,” “believe,” “plan,” “estimate,” “expect,” “intend,” “may” and other words that convey uncertainty of future events or outcomes, we are making forward-looking statements. We are not able to predict all the factors that may affect future results. We caution you that any forward-looking statements made by us are not guarantees of future performance and the
actual results may differ materially from those in our forward-looking statements. Some of the factors that could cause future results to differ materially from those expressed or implied by our forward-looking statements or from historical results, include, but are not limited to:
6
Item 1A. Risk Factors
You should carefully read the risks described below and other information in this Form 10-K in order to understand certain of the risks of our business.
Overview of Risk Factors
We have three business segments, water utility, electric utility and contracted services, each of which are subject to different risks as further discussed below. We are also subject to risks frequently encountered by businesses of our size.
Regulated Water and Electric Utility Operations
GSWC’s and BVESI’s revenues depend substantially on the rates and charges we are permitted to recover from our customers and the timing of that recovery. Decisions of the CPUC also could result in impairment charges and customer refunds, and delays in recovering costs in rates. Some of the factors impacting our ability to obtain rate recovery on a timely basis include opposition to rate increases arising out of increased costs for replacing aging infrastructure and increased costs associated with addressing climate change risks, such as drought and wildfires in California, costs incurred in connection with complying with water quality regulations, costs incurred in connection with complying with the COVID-19 pandemic, and costs incurred in connection with costs of obtaining and complying with franchise agreements with local governmental agencies and the costs of obtaining permits from local and federal governmental agencies. There may also be increased customer opposition to rate increases due to customer dissatisfaction with conservation rate structures, public safety power shutdowns and the closure of some customer service offices due to COVID-19 governmental shut-down orders.
Our water and electric utility services are provided in California. As a result, our financial results are largely subject to political, water supply, labor, utility cost and regulatory risks, economic conditions, natural disasters (which may increase as a result of climate change), and other risks affecting California businesses. Our assets are also subject to condemnation in California.
Contract Services Operations
All our contract services are provided to the U.S. government pursuant to the terms of 50-year firm, fixed-price contracts subject to annual economic price adjustments. These contracts may be terminated or services suspended at any time for convenience of the government. We are subject to penalties for failure to conform or comply with U.S. government regulations and the terms of our contracts and may be suspended or debarred for such failure to comply. The fees that we may charge are adjusted annually and in response to our requests for equitable adjustments. We have experienced delays in obtaining price and equitable adjustments, as well as delays in being paid by the U.S. government.
We are also responsible for complying with water quality and wastewater quality regulations on military bases.
We compete with other companies in bidding on providing utility services on military bases and costs associated with bidding on new contracts for providing water and wastewater services at military bases. We submit bids on new government contracts for military bases based on estimates of cost and potential profit. Our estimates and judgment are important, for in the event we overpay to obtain a contract we could incur losses on it.
Other Business Risks
We may be subject to financial losses, penalties and other liabilities if we fail to operate and maintain safe work sites, equipment and facilities, including losses, damages, penalties and other liabilities arising from wildfires, other natural disasters and terrorist activities. We may not be able to recover all these losses from insurance or from ratepayers or may experience delays in obtaining recovery for these losses.
We are also subject to other business risks typical of our business, including:
•Security risks, data protection and cyber-attacks that could disrupt our operations, increase our expenses, result in liabilities to third parties and damage to our reputation;
•Failure to attract, train, develop and transition key employees with the necessary skills to replace employees who are retiring or otherwise terminate employment or to fill new positions needed to respond to the increase in public utility and environmental regulations;
•Failure to make accurate estimates about financing and accounting matters, and in filing requests for rate increases with the CPUC or requests for price adjustments with the U.S. government or in bids on military privatization contracts;
•Our ability to finance the significant capital expenditures required by our businesses, which could be adversely impacted by general economic and market conditions;
7
•Changes in accounting, public utility, environmental and tax laws and regulations impacting our business;
•Our inability to comply with debt covenants in our debt agreements, and
•Final determination of our income tax liability by the federal and applicable state governments.
As a holding company, AWR is dependent upon dividends from its subsidiaries to pay dividends to its shareholders. The ability of its subsidiaries to pay dividends is dependent upon compliance with state laws governing the payment of dividends and the terms of the debt agreements with the applicable subsidiary.
Risks Associated with Regulated Public Utility and Contracted Services Operations
Our businesses are heavily regulated and, as a result, decisions by regulatory agencies and changes in laws and regulationsor the U.S. government can significantly affect our businessbusinesses
GSWC's and BVESI's revenues depend substantially on the rates and fees it charges itsthey charge their customers and thetheir ability to recover its costs on a timely basis, including the ability to recover the costs of purchased water, groundwater assessments, electricity, natural gas, chemicals, water treatment, security at water facilities and preventative maintenance and emergency repairs. Any delays by the CPUC in granting rate relief to cover increased operating and capital costs at our public utilities or delays in obtaining approval of our requests at ASUS for economic price or equitable adjustments for contracted services from the U.S. government may adversely affect our financial performance. We may file for interim rates in California in situations where there may be delays in granting final rate relief during a general rate case proceeding. If the CPUC approves lower rates, the CPUC will require us to refund to customers the difference between the interim rates and the rates approved by the CPUC. Similarly, if the CPUC approves rates that are higher than the interim rates, the CPUC may authorize us to recover the difference between the interim rates and the final rates.
Regulatory decisions affecting GSWC and/or BVESI may also impact prospective revenues and earnings, affect the timing of the recognition of revenues and expenses, may overturn past decisions used in determining our revenues and expenses, and could result in impairment charges and customer refunds. On August 27, 2020, the CPUC issued a final decision in the first phase of the CPUC’s Order Instituting Rulemaking evaluating the low income ratepayer assistance and affordability objectives contained in the CPUC’s 2010 Water Action Plan, which also addressed the continued use of the Water Revenue Adjustment Mechanism ("WRAM") and the Modified Cost Balancing Account ("MCBA") by California water utilities.Based on the final decision, any general rate case application filed by GSWC and the other California water utilities after the August 27, 2020 effective date of this decision, may not include a proposal to continue the use of the WRAM or MCBA, but may instead include a proposal to use a limited price adjustment mechanism (the Monterey-Style WRAM) and an incremental supply cost balancing account. GSWC's next water general rate case application will be filed in 2023 to establish new rates for the years 2025 - 2027 and, therefore, GSWC will keep the use of the WRAM and MCBA through the year 2024. Replacing the WRAM and MCBA with mechanisms recommended in the final decision could result in more volatility in GSWC’s future earnings and could prevent full recovery of its authorized water gross margin.GSWC, other California water utilities, and the California Water Association have filed separate applications for rehearing on this matter.At this time, management cannot predict the outcome of this matter.
Management continually evaluates the anticipated recovery of regulatory assets, settlement of liabilities and revenues subject to refund and provides for allowances and reserves as deemed necessary. In the event that our assessment of the probability of recovery or settlement through the ratemaking process is incorrect, we will adjust the associated regulatory asset or liability to reflect the change in our assessment or any regulatory disallowances. A change in our evaluation of the probability over the recovery of regulatory assets including a future disallowance of previously granted regulatory mechanisms, or a regulatory disallowance of all or a portion of our costs could have a material adverse effect on our financial results.
We are also, in some cases, required to estimate future expenses and, in others, we are required to incur the expense before recovering costs. As a result, our revenues and earnings may fluctuate depending on the accuracy of our estimates, the timing of our investments or expenses or other factors. If expenses increase significantly over a short period, we may experience delays in recovery of these expenses, the inability to recover carrying costs for these expenses, and increased risks of regulatory disallowances or write-offs.
Changes in laws, regulations and policies of regulatory agencies can significantly affect our business
Regulatory agencies may also change their rules and policies, which may adversely affect our profitability and cash flows. Changes in policies of the U.S. government may also adversely affect one or more of our Military Utility Privatization Subsidiaries. In certain circumstances, the U.S. government may be unwilling or unable to appropriate funds to pay costs mandated by changes in rules and policies of federal or state regulatory agencies. The U.S. government may disagree with the increases that we request and may delay approval of requests for equitable adjustment or economic price adjustments, which could adversely affect our anticipated rates of return.return at our contracted services business.
8
We may also be subject to fines or penalties if a regulatory agency includingor the U.S. government determinesdetermine that we have failed to comply with laws, regulations or orders applicable to our businesses, unless we successfully appeal such an adverse determination. Regulatory agencies may also disallow recovery of certain costs if they determine they may no longer be recovered in rates, or if audit findings determine that we have failed to comply with our policies and procedures for procurement or other practices.
Our liquidity and earnings may be adversely affected by wildfires
Some of our infrastructure in California is aging. We have experienced leaks and mechanical problems in some of these older systems. In addition, well and pump maintenance expenses are affected by labor and material costs and more stringent environmental regulations. Our electrical systems have also required upgrades due to aging and new wildfire safety and other compliance requirements. These costs can increase substantially and unexpectedly.
We include estimated increases in maintenance costs for future years in each water and electric general rate case filed by GSWC and BVESI, respectively, for possible recovery.
Our assets at our regulated utilities are subject to condemnation
Municipalities and other governmental subdivisions may, in certain circumstances, seek to acquire certain of our assets through eminent domain proceedings. It is generally our practice to contest these proceedings, which may be costly and may temporarily divert the attention of management from the operation of our business. If a municipality or other governmental subdivision succeeds in acquiring our assets, there is a risk that we will not receive adequate compensation for the assets taken or be able to recover all charges associated with the condemnation of such assets. In addition, we would no longer be entitled to any portion of revenue generated from the use of such assets.
Our costs of obtaining and complying with the terms of franchise agreements are increasing
Cities and counties in which GSWC operatesand BVESI operate have granted GSWCthem franchises to construct, maintain and use pipes and appurtenances in public streets and rights of way. The costs of obtaining, renewing and complying with the terms of these franchise agreements have been increasing as cities and counties attempt to regulate GSWC’sour operations within the boundaries of the city or unincorporated areas of the counties in which GSWCwe operates. Cities and counties have also been imposing new
fees on GSWC’sour operations, including pipeline abandonment fees and road-cut or other types of capital improvement fees. At the same time, there is increasing opposition from consumer groups to rate increases that may be necessary to compensate GSWC and BVESI for the increased costs of regulation by local governments. These trends may adversely affect GSWC’sour ability to recover in rates itsthe costs of providing water service and to efficiently manage capital expenditures and operating and maintenance expenses within CPUC-authorized levels.
Adverse publicity and reputational risks can lead to increased regulatory oversight or sanctions
As a utility company, we have a large customer base and are therefore, subject to public criticism regarding, among other things, the quality and reliability of our water and electricity services, and the accuracy, timeliness and format of bills that are provided to our customers for such services. Adverse publicity and negative customer sentiment may cause regulatory authorities, including the CPUC, and other governing bodies to view us unfavorably and cause us to be susceptible to increased oversight and more stringent regulations and economic requirements.
Our operations are geographically concentrated in California
Although we operate water and wastewater facilities in a number of states under our contracted services business, our regulated water and electric operations are concentrated in California, particularly Southern California. As a result, our financial results are largely subject to political, water supply, labor, utility cost and regulatory risks, economic conditions, natural disasters (which may increase as a result of climate change) and other risks affecting California. Our financial results may also be impacted by population growth or decline in our service areas.
9
Our business requires significant capital expenditures and our inability to access the capital or financial markets could affect our ability to meet our liquidity needs and long-term commitments, which could adversely impact our operations and financial results
The utility business is capital intensive. We spend significant sums of money for additions to, or replacement of, our property, plant and equipment at our water and electric regulated utilities. We obtain funds for these capital projects from operations, contributions by developers and others, and refundable advances from developers (which are repaid over a period of time). We also periodically borrow money or issue equity for these purposes. In addition, we have revolving credit facilities that are partially used for these purposes. We cannot provide assurance that these sources will continue to be adequate or that the cost of funds will remain at levels permitting us to earn a reasonable rate of return.
As our capital investment program continues to increase, coupled with the elimination of bonus depreciation for regulated utilities due to tax reform, we will need access to external financing more often, which increases our exposure to market conditions. In addition to cash flow from operations, we rely primarily on our credit facilities and long-term private placement notes to satisfy our liquidity needs. Changes in market conditions, including events beyond our control, could also limit our ability to access capital on terms favorable to us or at all, including credit facilities with the borrowing capacities needed as well as issuing long-term debt. As a result, the amount of capital available may not be sufficient to meet all our liquidity needs at a reasonable cost at all of our subsidiaries.
Risks Associated with Health, Safety and Liability Matters
Our liquidity and earnings may be adversely affected by wildfires
It is possible that wildfires may occur more frequently, be of longer duration or impact larger areas as a result of drought-damaged plants and trees, lower humidity or higher winds that may occur as result of changing weather patterns. Our liquidity, earnings and operations may be materially adversely affected by wildfires. We may be required to (i) incur greater costs to relocate lines or increase our trimming of trees and other plants near our electric facilities to avoid wildfires, (ii) make significant additional capital expenditures to fund the projects in BVESI's wildfire and safety mitigation plans, and (iii) bear the costs of damages to property or injuries to the public if it is determined that our power lines or other electrical equipment was a cause of such damages or injuries. In addition, wildfires may result in reduced demand if structures are destroyed or unusable following a wildfire, and may adversely affect our ability to provide water or electric service in our service areas due to public safety power shutdowns or any of our water or electric utility infrastructure is damaged by a wildfire.
Losses by insurance companies resulting from wildfires in California may cause insurance coverage for wildfire risks to become more expensive or unavailable on reasonable terms, and our insurance may be inadequate to recover all our losses incurred in a wildfire. We might not be allowed to recover in our rates any increased costs of wildfire insurance or the costs of any uninsured wildfire losses.
Electric utilities in California are authorized to shut off power for public safety reasons, such as during periods of extreme fire hazard, if the utility reasonably believes that there is an imminent and significant risk that strong winds may topple power lines or cause vegetation to come into contact with power lines leading to increased risk of fire. Shut-offs can reduce BVESI's liquidity and decrease customer satisfaction.
These shut-offs can also adversely affect GSWC’s water utility operations if the electric utilities that provide electric service to GSWC’s water operations shut off power lines that deliver electricity to GSWC’s water plant and equipment, thereby adversely affecting its ability to provide water service to its customers.
We may be held strictly liable for damages to property caused by our equipment even if we are not negligent
Utilities in California may be held strictly liable for damages caused by their property, such as mains, fire hydrants, power lines and other equipment, even though they were not negligent in the operation and maintenance of that property, under a doctrine known as inverse condemnation. Our liquidity, earnings and operations may be adversely affected if we are unable to recover the costs of paying claims for damages caused by the non-negligent operation and maintenance of our property from customers or through insurance.
The outbreak of COVID-19, or other similar pandemics, and their impact on business and economic conditions could negatively affect our financial condition.
The COVID-19 outbreak, the resulting pandemic, and the impact on the economy and financial markets could adversely affect the Company’s financial condition. We have continued our operations given that water, wastewater, and electric utility services are deemed essential, and have implemented health and safety measures such as implementing worker-distancing measures and using a remote workforce where possible. However, there is no assurance that the continued spread of COVID-19 and efforts to contain the virus (including, but not limited to, voluntary and mandatory quarantines, restrictions on travel, limiting gatherings of people, and reduced operations and extended closures of many businesses), or other similar
10
pandemics, will not materially impact our financial condition. In particular, the continued spread of COVID-19 and efforts to contain the virus could:
•reduce the availability and productivity of our employees;
•cause us to experience an increase in costs as a result of our emergency measures, delayed payments from our customers and uncollectible accounts as a result of the impact on our customers' ability to pay bills due to voluntary and mandatory stay-at-home orders;
•cause our contractors, suppliers and other business partners to be unable to fulfill their contractual obligations in the ordinary course of business or otherwise disrupt our supply chain;
•impact our liquidity position and cost of and ability to access funds from financial institutions and capital markets;
•cause delays in capital expenditures activity due to, among other things, delays in obtaining permits from local governments or local mandated restrictions on shutting off service as part of the response to the pandemic;
•have an adverse impact on the value of our pension and retirement assets, and
•increase customer dissatisfaction due to an increase in customer wait times resulting from a rise in customer calls, and general anxiety due to personal circumstances arising from the pandemic.
The CPUC has authorized GSWC and BVESI to track incremental costs, including bad debt expense in excess of what is included in their respective revenue requirements, incurred as a result of the pandemic in COVID-19-related memorandum accounts to be filed with the CPUC for future recovery.
We may be subject to financial losses, penalties and other liabilities if we fail to maintain safe work sites, equipment or facilities
Our safety record is critical to our reputation. We maintain health and safety standards to protect our employees, customers, vendors and the public. Although we aim to comply with such health and safety standards, it is unlikely that we will be able to avoid all accidents or other events resulting in damage to property or the public.
Our business sites, including construction and maintenance sites, often put our employees and others in close proximity with large pieces of equipment, moving vehicles, pressurized water, chemicals and other regulated materials. On many sites, we are responsible for safety and, accordingly, must implement safety procedures. If we fail in any respect to implement such procedures or if the procedures we implement are ineffective or are not followed by our employees or others, our employees and others may be injured or die. Unsafe work sites also have the potential to increase our operating costs. Any of the foregoing could result in financial losses, which could have a material adverse impact on our business, financial condition, and results of operations.
Our operations may involve the handling and storage of hazardous chemicals that, if improperly handled, stored or disposed of, could subject us to penalties or other liabilities. We are also subject to regulations dealing with occupational health and safety. Although we maintain functional employee groups whose primary purpose is to ensure that we implement effective health, safety, and environmental work procedures throughout our organization, including construction sites and maintenance sites, a failure to comply with such regulations in any respect could subject us to liability.
The generation, transmission and distribution of electricity are dangerous and involve inherent risks of damage to private property and injury to employees and the general public
Electricity is dangerous for employees and the general public should they come in contact with electrical current or equipment, including through downed power lines, sparking during high-wind events or equipment malfunctions. Injuries and property damage caused by such events may subject BVESI to significant liabilities that may not be covered or fully covered by insurance. Additionally, the CPUC has delegated to its staff the authority to issue citations, which carry a fine of $50,000 per-violation per day, to electric utilities subject to its jurisdiction for violations of safety rules found in statutes, regulations, and the General Orders of the CPUC, which could also materially affect BVESI's liquidity and results of operations.
We may sustain losses that exceed or are excluded from our insurance coverage or for which we are not insured
We are, from time to time, parties to legal or regulatory proceedings. These proceedings may pertain to regulatory investigations, employment matters or other disputes. Management periodically reviews its assessment of the probable outcome of these proceedings, the costs and expenses reasonably expected to be incurred, and the availability and extent of insurance coverage. On the basis of this review, management establishes reserves for such matters. We may, however, from time to time be required to pay fines, penalties or damages that exceed our insurance coverage and/or reserves if our estimate of the probable outcome of such proceedings proves to be inaccurate.
11
We maintain insurance coverage as part of our overall legal and risk management strategy to minimize our potential liabilities. Generally, our insurance policies cover property, workers' compensation, general liability, automobile liability, and other risks. Insurance coverage may not cover certain claims involving punitive damages. Each policy includes deductibles or self-insured retentions and policy limits for covered claims. Our insurance policies also contain exclusions and other limitations that may not cover our potential liabilities. Furthermore, we have experienced increased costs and difficulties in obtaining certain insurance coverage. We may experience further increased insurance costs and/or coverage reductions in future years. As a result, we may sustain losses that exceed or that are excluded from our insurance coverage or for which we are not insured.
Uninsured losses and increases in the cost of insurance may not be recoverable or fully recoverable in customer rates. A loss which is not insured or not fully insured or cannot be recovered in customer rates could materially affect our financial condition and results of operations.
We operate in areas subject to natural disasters
We operate in areas that are prone to earthquakes, fires, mudslides, hurricanes, tornadoes, flooding or other natural disasters. While we maintain insurance policies to help reduce our financial exposure, a significant seismic event in Southernsouthern California, where GSWC'sour regulated water and electric operations are concentrated, wildfires or other natural disasters in any of the areas that we serve could adversely impact our ability to deliver water and electricity or provide wastewater service, and adversely affect our costs of operations. With respect to GSWC and BVESI, the CPUC has historically allowed utilities to establish a catastrophic event memorandum account to potentially recover such costs.incremental costs not covered in rates. With respect to the Military Utility Privatization Subsidiaries, costs associated with responseresponding to natural disasters have been recoverable through requests for equitable adjustment.
Our operations may be the target of terrorist activities
Terrorists could seek to disrupt service to our customers by targeting our assets. We have invested in additional security for facilities throughout our regulated service areas to mitigate the risks of terrorist activities. We also may be prevented from providing water and/or wastewater services at the military bases we serve in times of military crisis affecting these bases.
Water Quality Regulatory Risks
Our costs involved in maintaining water quality and complying with environmental regulation have increased and are expected to continue to increase
Our capital and operating costs at GSWC may increase substantially as a result of increases in environmental regulation arising from increases in the cost of upgrading and building new water treatment plants, disposing of residuals from our water treatment plants, handling and storing hazardous chemicals, compliance-monitoring activities and securing alternative supplies when necessary. GSWC may be able to recover these costs from customers through the ratemaking process. We may also be able to recover these costs from certain third parties under settlement and contractual arrangements. Our capital and operating costs may also increase as a result of changes in laboratory detection capabilities and drinking water notification and response levels for certain substances, such as perfluoroalkyl substances (“PFAS”) used to make certain fabrics and other materials, certain fire suppression agents and used in various industrial processes.
Our operating costs may increase as a result of groundwater contamination
Our operations can be impacted by groundwater contamination in certain service territories. Historically, we have taken a number of steps to address contamination, including the removal of wells from service, decreasing the amount of groundwater pumped from wells in order to facilitate remediation of plumes of contaminated water, constructing water treatment facilities and securing alternative sources of supply from other areas not affected by the contamination. In emergency situations, we have supplied our customers with bottled water until the emergency situation has been resolved.
Our ability to recover these types of costs depends upon a variety of factors, including approval of rate increases, the willingness of potentially responsible parties to settle litigation and otherwise address the contamination, and the extent and magnitude of the contamination. We may recover costs from certain third parties that may be responsible, or potentially responsible, for groundwater contamination. However, we often experience delays in obtaining recovery of these costs and incur additional costs associated with seeking recovery from responsible or potentially responsible parties, which may adversely impact our liquidity. In some events, we may be unable to recover all of these costs from third parties due to the inability to identify the potentially responsible parties, the lack of financial resources of responsible parties or the high litigation costs associated with obtaining recovery from responsible or potentially responsible parties.
We can give no assurance regarding the adequacy of any such recovery to offset the costs associated with contamination or the cost of recovery of any legal costs. To date, the CPUC has permitted us to establish memorandum accounts for potential recovery of these types of costs when they have arisen.
12
Management believes that rate recovery, proper insurance coverage and reserves are in place to appropriately manage these types of contamination issues. However, such issues, if ultimately resolved unfavorably to us, could, in the aggregate, have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and financial condition.
Water Supply Risks
The adequacy of our water supplies depends upon weather and a variety of other uncontrollable factors
The adequacy of our water supplies varies from year to year depending upon a variety of factors, including:
•rainfall, basin replenishment, flood control, snow pack levels in California and the West, reservoir levels and availability of reservoir storage;
•availability of Colorado River water and imported water from the State Water Project;
•the amount of usable water stored in reservoirs and groundwater basins;
•the amount of water used by our customers and others;
•water quality;
•legal limitations on production, diversion, storage, conveyance and use; and
•climate change.
More frequent and extended California drought conditions, changes in weather patterns and population growth in California cause increased stress on surface water supplies and groundwater basins. In addition, low or no allocations of water from the State Water Project and court-ordered pumping restrictions on water obtained from the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta decrease or eliminate the amount of water that the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California ("MWD") and other state water contractors are able to import from northern California.
We have implemented tiered rates and other practices, as appropriate, in order to encourage water conservation. We have also implemented programs to assist customers in complying with water usage reductions. Over the long term, we are acting to secure additional supplies, which may include supplies from desalination and increase use of reclaimed water, where appropriate and feasible. We cannot predict the extent to which these efforts to reduce stress on our water supplies will be successful or sustainable, or the extent to which these efforts will enable us to continue to satisfy all of the water needs of our customers.
Water shortages at GSWC may:
•adversely affect our supply mix, for instance, by causing increased reliance upon more expensive water sources;
•adversely affect our operating costs, for instance, by increasing the cost of producing water from more highly contaminated aquifers or requiring us to transport water over longer distances, truck water to water systems or adopt other emergency measures to enable us to continue to provide water service to our customers;
•result in an increase in our capital expenditures over the long term, for example, by requiring future construction of pipelines to connect to alternative sources of supply, new wells to replace those that are no longer in service or are otherwise inadequate to meet the needs of our customers, and other facilities to conserve or reclaim water;
•adversely affect the volume of water sold as a result of such factors as mandatory or voluntary conservation efforts by customers, changes in customer conservation patterns, recycling of water by customers and imposition of new regulations impacting such things as landscaping and irrigation patterns;
•adversely affect aesthetic water quality if we are unable to flush our water systems as frequently due to water shortages or drought restrictions; and
•result in customer dissatisfaction and harm to our reputation if water service is reduced, interrupted or otherwise adversely affected as a result of drought, water contamination or other causes.
Our liquidity may be adversely affected by changes in water supply costs
We obtain our water supplies for GSWC from a variety of sources, which vary among our water systems. Certain systems obtain all of their supply from water that is pumped from aquifers within our service areas; some systems purchase all of their supply from wholesale suppliers; some systems obtain their supply from treating surface water sources; and other systems obtain their supply from a combination of wells, surface water sources and/or wholesale suppliers. The cost of obtaining these supplies varies, and overall costs can be impacted as use within a system varies from time to time. As a result, our cost of providing, distributing and treating water for our customers’ use can vary significantly.
13
Furthermore, imported water wholesalers, such as MWD, may not always have an adequate supply of water to sell to us. Wholesale water suppliers may increase their prices for water delivered to us based on factors that affect their operating costs. Purchased water rate increases are beyond our control.
GSWC has implemented a modified supply cost balancing account ("MCBA") to track and recover costs from supply mix changes and rate changes by wholesale suppliers, as authorized by the CPUC. However, cash flows from operations can be significantly affected since much of the balance we recognize in the MCBA is collected from or refunded to customers primarily through surcharges or surcredits, respectively, generally over twelve- to twenty-four-months.
Our liquidity and earnings may be adversely affected by our conservation efforts
Our water utility business is heavily dependent upon revenue generated from rates charged to our customers based on the volume of water used. The rates we charge for water are regulated by the CPUC and may not be adequately adjusted to reflect changes in demand. Declining usage also negatively impacts our long-term operating revenues if we are unable to secure rate increases or if growth in the customer base does not occur to the extent necessary to offset per-customer usage decline.
Conservation by all customer classes at GSWC is a top priority. However, customer conservation will result in lower volumes of water sold. We may experience a decline in per-customer water usage due to factors such as:
•conservation efforts to reduce costs;
•drought conditions resulting in additional water conservation;
•the use of more efficient household fixtures and appliances by consumers to save water;
•voluntary or mandatory changes in landscaping and irrigation patterns;
•recycling of water by our customers; and
•mandated water-use restrictions.
These types of changes may result in permanent decreases in demand even if our water supplies are sufficient to meet higher levels of demand after a drought ends. In addition, governmental restrictions on water usage during drought conditions may result in a decreased demand for water, even if our sources of supply are sufficient to serve our customers during such drought conditions.
We implemented the CPUC-approved WRAM at GSWC, which has the effect of reducing the adverse earnings impact of our customers’ conservation efforts on revenues. However, cash flows from operations can be significantly affected since much of the balance we recognize in the WRAM account is collected from or refunded to customers generally over twelve-, eighteen- or twenty-four-month periods. In addition, based on a CPUC decision effective August 27, 2020, any general rate case application filed after that date may not include a proposal to use the WRAM or MCBA, but may instead include a proposal to use a limited price adjustment mechanism and an incremental supply cost balancing account. Replacing the WRAM and MCBA could result in increased earnings volatility.
Electric Segment Operations Risks
Our electric segment operates in a high wildfire risk area
BVESI is required to adopt and implement a wildfire safety and mitigation plan that is submitted periodically to, and subject to the approval of, the CPUC. The recovery of costs incurred to implement this plan are not approved by the CPUC at the time of its approval of the wildfire mitigation plan, but will only be approved by the CPUC in a subsequent general rate case. We anticipate that the costs of capital improvements necessary to implement this program will increase substantially.
BVESI is also required to implement a public safety power shut-off program during high threat conditions. The CPUC may assess penalties if BVESI shuts-down power to its customers if the CPUC determines that the shutdown was not reasonably necessary in the circumstances.
BVESI has also obtained a safety certificate, which must be renewed annually by the CPUC. Even with an approved safety certificate, BVESI could be found liable for deaths, injuries and property damage if BVESI’s electric equipment is found to have caused a catastrophic wildfire. BVESI may not be able to recover the costs of all liabilities from such a wildfire from insurance or from ratepayers.
14
Our liquidity may be adversely affected by increases in electricity and natural gas prices in California
We purchase most of the electric energy sold to customers in our electric customer service area from others under purchased power contracts. In addition to purchased power contracts, we purchase additional energy from the spot market to meet peak demand and following the expiration of purchased power contracts if there are delays in obtaining CPUC authorization of new purchase power contracts. We may sell surplus power to the spot market during times of reduced energy demand. As a result, our cash flows may be affected by increases in spot market prices of electricity purchased and decreases in spot market prices for electricity sold. However, BVESI has implemented supply-cost balancing accounts, as approved by the CPUC, to mitigate the impact to earnings from fluctuations in supply costs.
Unexpected generator downtime at our 8.4 megawatt natural-gas-fueled generator or a failure to perform by any of the counterparties to our electric and natural gas purchase contracts could further increase our exposure to fluctuating natural gas and electricity prices.
Changes in electricity prices also affect the unrealized gains and losses on our block forward purchased power contracts that qualify as derivative instruments since we adjust the asset or liability on these contracts to reflect the fair market value of the contracts at the end of each month. The CPUC has authorized us to establish a memorandum account to track the changes in the fair market value of our purchased power contracts. As a result, unrealized gains and losses on these types of purchased power contracts do not impact earnings.
We may not be able to procure sufficient renewable energy resources to comply with CPUC rules
We are required to procure a portion of our electricity for BVESI from renewable energy resources to meet the CPUC’s renewable procurement requirements. We have an agreement with a third party to purchase renewable energy credits, which we believe enables us to meet these requirements through 2023. In the event that the third party fails to perform in accordance with the terms of the agreement, we may not be able to obtain sufficient resources to meet the renewable procurement requirements. We may be subject to fines and penalties by the CPUC if it determines that we are not in compliance with the renewable resource procurement rules.
Utility Privatization Contract Risks
Our 50-year contracts for servicing military bases create certain risks that are different from our public utility operations
We have entered into contracts to provide water and/or wastewater services at military bases pursuant to 50-year firm, fixed-priced contracts, subject to termination, in whole or in part, for the convenience of the U.S. government. In addition, the U.S. government may stop work under the terms of one or more of the contracts, delay performance of our obligations under the contracts or modify the contracts at its convenience.
Our contract pricing is based on a number of assumptions, including assumptions about the condition and amount of infrastructure at the military bases, prices and availability of labor, equipment and materials. We may be unable to recover all costs if any of these assumptions are inaccurate or if all costs incurred in connection with performing the work were not considered. Our contracts are also subject to annual economic price adjustments or other changes permitted by the terms of the contracts. Prices are also subject to equitable adjustment based upon changes in circumstances, laws or regulations and service-requirement changes to the extent provided in each of the contracts.
We are required to record all costs under these types of contracts as they are incurred. As a result, we may record losses associated with unanticipated conditions that result in higher than estimated costs, higher than anticipated infrastructure levels, and required emergency work at the time such expenses occur. We recognize additional revenue for such work as, and to the extent that, our economic price adjustments and/or requests for equitable adjustments are approved. Delays in obtaining approval of economic price adjustments and/or equitable adjustments can negatively impact our results of operations and cash flows.
Certain payments under these contracts are subject to appropriations by Congress. We may experience delays in receiving payment or delays in price adjustments due to canceled or delayed appropriations specific to our projects or reductions in government spending for the military generally or military-base operations specifically. Appropriations and the timing of payment may be influenced by, among other things, the state of the economy, competing political priorities, budget constraints, the timing and amount of tax receipts, government shutdowns and the overall level of government expenditures.
Our contracts for the construction of infrastructure improvements on military bases create risks that are different from those of our public utility operations and maintenance activities
We have entered into contract modifications with the U.S. government and agreements with third parties for the construction of new water and/or wastewater infrastructure at the military bases on which we operate. Most of these contracts
15
are firm fixed-price contracts. Under firm fixed-price contracts, we will benefit from cost savings, but are generally unable (except for changes in scope or circumstances approved by the U.S. government or third party) to recover any cost overruns to the approved contract price. Under most circumstances, the U.S. government or third party has approved increased-cost change orders due to changes in scope of work performed.
We generally recognize contract revenues from these types of contracts over time using input methods to measure progress towards satisfying a performance obligation. The measurement of performance over time is based on cost incurred relative to total estimated costs, or the physical completion of the construction projects. The earnings or losses recognized on individual contracts are based on periodic estimates of contract revenues, costs and profitability as these construction projects progress.
We establish prices for these types of firm fixed-price contracts and the overall 50-year contracts taken as a whole, based, in part, on cost estimates that are subject to a number of assumptions, including assumptions regarding future economic conditions. If these estimates prove inaccurate or circumstances change, cost overruns could have a material adverse effect on our contracted business operations and results of operations.
We may be adversely affected by disputes with the U.S. government regarding our performance of contracted services on military bases
Entering into contracts with the U.S. government subjects us to a number of operational and compliance risks over our performance of contracted services on military bases. We are periodically audited or reviewed by the Defense Contract Auditing Agency (“DCAA”) and/or the Defense Contract Management Agency ("DCMA") for compliance with federal acquisition regulations, cost-accounting standards and other laws, regulations and standards that are not applicable to the operations of GSWC or BVESI. During the course of these audits/reviews, the DCAA or DCMA may question our incurred project costs or the manner in which we have accounted for such costs and recommend to our U.S. government administrative contracting officer that such costs be disallowed. If there is a dispute with the U.S. government regarding performance under these contracts or the amounts owed to us, the U.S. government may delay, reject or withhold payment, delay price adjustments or assert its right to offset damages against amounts owed to us. If we are unable to collect amounts owed to us on a timely basis or the U.S. government asserts its offset rights, profits and cash flows could be adversely affected.
Moreover, we are subject to potential government investigations of our business practices and compliance with government procurement and security regulations. If we are charged with wrongdoing as a result of an investigation, or if we fail to comply with the terms of one or more of our U.S. government contracts, other agreements with the U.S. government or U.S. government statutes and regulations, our existing contracts could be terminated or we could be suspended or barred from future U.S. government contracts for a period of time, and be subject to possible damages, fines and penalties as well as damage to our reputation in the water and wastewater industry, which could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and cash flows.
We depend, to some extent, upon subcontractors to assist us in the performance of contracted services on military bases
We rely, to some extent, on subcontractors to assist us in the operation and maintenance of the water and wastewater systems at military bases. The failure of any of these subcontractors to perform services for us in accordance with the terms of our contracts with the U.S. government could result in the termination of our contract to provide water and/or wastewater services at the affected base(s), and/or a loss of revenues, or increases in costs, to correct a subcontractor’s performance failures.
We are also required to make a good faith effort to achieve our small business subcontracting plan goals pursuant to U.S. government regulations. If we fail to use good faith efforts to meet these goals, the U.S. government may assess damages against us at the end of the contract. The U.S. government has the right to offset claimed damages against any amounts owed to us.
We also rely on third-party manufacturers, as well as third-party subcontractors, to complete our construction projects. To the extent that we cannot engage subcontractors or acquire equipment or materials, our ability to complete a project in a timely fashion or at a profit may be impaired. If the amount of costs we incur for these projects exceeds the amount we have estimated in our bids, we could experience reduced profits or losses in the performance of these contracts. In addition, if a subcontractor or manufacturer is unable to deliver its services, equipment or materials according to the negotiated terms for any reason, including the deterioration of its financial condition, we may be required to purchase the services, equipment or materials from another source at a higher price. This may reduce the profit to be realized or result in a loss on a project for which the services, equipment or materials were needed.
If subcontractors fail to perform services to be provided to us or fail to provide us with the proper equipment or materials, we may be penalized for their failure to perform; however, our contracts with subcontractors include certain
16
protective provisions, which may include the assessment of liquidated damages. We also mitigate these risks by requiring our subcontractors, as appropriate, to obtain performance bonds and to compensate us for any penalties we may be required to pay as a result of their failure to perform.
We may not be fully reimbursed for all of our construction costs or may only receive payment on a delayed basis
Unlike GSWC and BVESI, who recover their capital investments from customers over the life of the assets through annual depreciation and earn a return on such investments through the ratemaking process, ASUS is reimbursed for the cost of ongoing renewal and replacement construction projects plus a profit through the collection of a monthly cash stream under each of the 50-year contracts with the U.S. government. ASUS also receives funding from the U.S. government for initial and other new construction projects at the military bases it serves that in many cases are outside the scope of the 50-year contracts and are granted through firm-fixed contract modifications. Our Military Utility Privatization Subsidiaries expect to continue incurring significant construction costs. Reimbursement by the U.S government for these construction costs may not be fully reimbursable if the costs incurred are greater than the amounts estimated and approved by the U.S. government, or payments may be delayed awaiting government funding and processing, which could significantly affect our cash flows from operations.
Other Contracted Services Segment Risks
Risks associated with wastewater systems are different from those of our water distribution operations
The wastewater-collection-system operations of our ASUS subsidiaries providing wastewater services on military bases are subject to substantial regulation and involve significant environmental risks. If collection, treatment or disposal systems fail, overflow or do not operate properly, untreated wastewater or other contaminants could spill onto nearby properties or into nearby streams and rivers, causing damage to persons or property, injury to aquatic life and economic damages. The cost of addressing such damages may not be recoverable. This risk is most acute during periods of substantial rainfall or flooding, which are common causes of sewer overflows and system failures. These risks may be increased as a result of an increase in the duration and frequency of storms due to climate change. Liabilities resulting from such damage could adversely and materially affect our business, results of operations and financial condition. In the event that we are deemed liable for any damage caused by overflows, our losses may not be recoverable under our contracts with the U.S. government or covered by insurance policies. We may also find it difficult to secure insurance for this business in the future at acceptable rates.
We may have responsibility for water quality at the military bases we serve
While it is the responsibility of the U.S. government to provide the source of water supply to meet the Military Utility Privatization Subsidiaries’ water distribution system requirements under their 50-year contracts, the Military Utility Privatization Subsidiaries, as the water system permit holders for most of the bases they serve, are responsible for ensuring the continued compliance of the provided source of supply with all federal, state and local regulations. We believe, however, that the terms of the contracts between the Military Utility Privatization Subsidiaries and the U.S. government provide the opportunity for us to recover costs incurred in the treatment or remediation of any quality issue that arises from the source of water supply.
Our earnings may be affected, to some extent, by weather during different seasons
Seasonal weather conditions, such as hurricanes, heavy rainfall or significant winter storms, occasionally cause temporary office closures and/or result in temporary halts to construction activity at military bases. To the extent that our construction activities are impeded by these events, we will experience a delay in recognizing revenues from these construction projects.
We continue to incur costs associated with the expansion of our contract activities
We continue to incur additional costs in connection with the expansion of our contract operations associated with the preparation of bids for new contract operations on prospective and existing military bases. Our ability to recover these costs and to earn a profit on our contract operations will depend upon the extent to which we are successful in obtaining new contracts and recovering these costs and other costs from new contract revenues.
We face intense competition for new military privatization contracts
An important part of our growth strategy is the expansion of our contracted services business through new contract awards to serve additional military bases for the U.S. government. ASUS competes with other investor-owned utilities, municipalities, and other entities for these contracts.
Additionally, should the U.S. government decide to curtail or eliminate the issuance of solicitations for future military privatization contract awards, the potential for growth in this segment could be negatively impacted.
17
Information Technology Risk Factors
We must successfully maintain and/or upgrade our information technology systems as we are increasingly dependent on the continuous and reliable operation of these systems
We rely on various information technology systems to manage our operations. Such systems require periodic modifications, upgrades and/or replacement, which subject us to inherent costs and risks including potential disruption of our internal control structure, substantial capital expenditures, additional administrative and operating expenses, retention of sufficiently skilled personnel to implement and operate the new systems, and other risks and costs of delays or difficulties in transitioning to new systems or of integrating new systems into our current systems. In addition, the difficulties with implementing new technology systems may cause disruptions in our business operations and have an adverse effect on our business and operations, if not anticipated and appropriately mitigated.
We rely on our computer, information and communications technology systems in connection with the operation of our business, especially with respect to customer service and billing, accounting and the monitoring and operation of our treatment, storage and pumping facilities. Our computer and communications systems and operations could be damaged or interrupted by weather, natural disasters, telecommunications failures, cyber-attacks or acts of war or terrorism or similar events or disruptions. Any of these or other events could cause system interruption, delays and loss of critical data, or delay or prevent operations and adversely affect our financial results and could result in liabilities not covered by insurance or recoverable in rates for misappropriation of assets or sensitive information, corruption of data and the impact of operational disruptions on our customers.
Security risks, data protection breaches and cyber-attacks could disrupt our internal operations, and any such disruption could increase our expenses, damage our reputation and adversely affect our stock price
There have been an increasing number of cyber-attacks on companies around the world, which have caused operational failures or compromised sensitive corporate or customer data. These attacks have occurred over the internet, through malware, viruses or attachments to e-mails, or through persons inside the organization or with access to systems inside the organization. Although we do not believe that our systems are at a materially greater risk of cyber security attacks than other similar organizations, our information technology systems remain at risk to damage or interruption from:
•supply chain attacks;
•ransomware;
•malware;
•hacking; and
•denial of service actions.
We have implemented security measures and will continue to devote significant resources to improve our security posture to address any security vulnerabilities in an effort to prevent cyber-attacks. Despite our efforts, due to the evolving nature of cyber-attacks and vulnerabilities, we cannot be assured that a cyber-attack will not cause water, wastewater or electric system problems, disrupt service to our customers, compromise important data or systems or result in unintended release of customer or employee information. Moreover, if a security breach affects our systems or results in the unauthorized release of sensitive data, our reputation could be materially damaged. We may not discover any security breach and loss of information for a significant period of time after the security breach. We could also be exposed to a risk of loss or litigation and possible liability. In addition, pursuant to U.S. government regulations regarding cyber-security of government contractors, we might be subject to fines, penalties or other actions, including debarment, with respect to current contracts or with respect to future contract opportunities. We maintain cybersecurity insurance to provide coverage for a portion of the losses and damages that may result from a security breach, but such insurance is subject to a number of exclusions and may not cover the total loss caused by a breach. Other costs associated with cyber events may not be covered by insurance or recoverable in rates. The market for cybersecurity insurance continues to evolve and may affect the future availability of cyber insurance at reasonable rates.
In addition, we must comply with privacy rights regulations such as The California Consumer Privacy Act (“CCPA”), a state statute that became effective January 1, 2020, which enhances the privacy rights and consumer protections for California residents. Among other things, the CCPA establishes statutory damages for victims of data security breaches, and provides additional rights for consumers to obtain their data from any business that has their personally identifying information. Any actual or perceived failure to comply with the CCPA could lead to investigations, claims, and proceedings by governmental entities and private parties, damages for breach, and other significant costs, penalties, and other liabilities, as well as harm to our reputation.
18
Human Capital Management and Supply Risks
Failure to attract, retain, train, motivate, develop and transition key employees could adversely affect our business
In order to be successful, we must attract, retain, train, motivate, and develop key employees, including those in managerial, operational, financial, regulatory, business-development and information-technology support positions. Our regulated business and contracted services operations are complex. Attracting and retaining high quality staff allows us to minimize the cost of providing quality service. In order to attract and retain key employees in a competitive marketplace, we must provide a competitive compensation package and be able to effectively recruit qualified candidates. This is especially challenging for us since approximately 28% of our employees will be eligible to retire in the next five years. The failure to successfully hire key employees or the loss of a material number of key employees could have a significant impact on the quality of our operations in the short term. Further, changes in our management team may be disruptive to our business, and any failure to successfully transition key new hires or promoted employees could adversely affect our business and results of operations.
Failure of our employees to maintain required certifications and licenses or to complete required compliance training could adversely impact our ability to operate and maintain our utility systems and provide services to our customers
Many of our employees must have specialized certifications and licenses in order to perform their duties and periodically complete required compliance training. Our business could be adversely affected if our employees do not maintain their certifications and licenses or we are unable to attract employees with the necessary certifications and licenses.
Other Business Risk Factors
The accuracy of our judgments and estimates about financial and accounting matters will impact our operating results and financial condition
The quality and accuracy of estimates and judgments used have an impact on our operating results and financial condition. If our estimates are not accurate, we will be required to make an adjustment in a future period. We make certain estimates and judgments in preparing our financial statements regarding, among others:
•timing of recovering WRAM and MCBA regulatory assets;
•amounts to set aside for uncollectible accounts receivable, inventory obsolescence and uninsured losses;
•our legal exposure and the appropriate accrual for claims, including general liability and workers' compensation claims;
•future costs and assumptions for pensions and other post-retirement benefits;
•regulatory recovery of deferred items; and
•possible tax uncertainties.
Market conditions and demographic changes may adversely impact the value of our benefit plan assets and liabilities
Market factors can affect assumptions we use in determining funding requirements with respect to our pension and other post-retirement benefit plans. For example, a relatively modest change in our assumptions regarding discount rates can materially affect our calculation of funding requirements. To the extent that market data compels us to reduce the discount rate used in our assumptions, our benefit obligations could materially increase, which could adversely affect our financial position and cash flows. Further, changes in demographics, such as increases in life expectancy assumptions may also increase the funding requirements of our obligations related to the pension and other post-retirement benefit plans.
Market conditions also affect the values of the assets that are held in trusts to satisfy significant future obligations under our pension and other post-retirement benefit plans. These assets are subject to market fluctuations, which may cause investment returns to fall below our projected rates of return. A decline in the market value of our pension and other post-retirement benefit plan assets will increase the funding requirements under these plans if future returns on these assets are insufficient to offset the decline in value. Future increases in pension and other post-retirement costs as a result of the reduced value of plan assets may not be fully recoverable in rates, and our results of operations and financial position could be negatively affected. These risks are mitigated to some extent by the two-way pension balancing accounts authorized by the CPUC, which permits us to track differences between forecasted annual pension expense adopted in water and electric rates and actual pension expenses for future recovery or refund to customers.
19
Payment of our debt may be accelerated if we fail to comply with restrictive covenants in our debt agreements
Our failure to comply with restrictive covenants in our debt agreements could result in an event of default. If the default is not cured or waived, we may be required to repay or refinance the debt before it becomes due. Even if we are able to obtain waivers from our creditors, we may only be able to do so on unfavorable terms.
The price of our Common Shares may be volatile and may be affected by market conditions beyond our control
The trading price of our Common Shares may fluctuate in the future because of the volatility of the stock market and a variety of other factors, many of which are beyond our control. Factors that could cause fluctuations in the trading price of our Common Shares include: changes in interest rates, regulatory developments; general economic conditions and trends; price and volume fluctuations in the overall stock market; actual or anticipated changes or fluctuations in our results of operations; actual or anticipated changes in the expectations of investors or securities analysts; actual or anticipated developments in other utilities' businesses or the competitive landscape generally; litigation involving us or our industry; major catastrophic events, or sales of large blocks of our stock.
AWR is a holding company that depends on cash flow from its subsidiaries to meet its financial obligations and to pay dividends on its Common Shares
As a holding company, our subsidiaries conduct substantially all operations and our only significant assets are investments in our subsidiaries. This means that we are dependent on distributions of funds from our subsidiaries to meet our debt service obligations and to pay dividends on our Common Shares.
Our subsidiaries are separate and distinct legal entities and generally have no obligation to pay any amounts due on AWR's credit facility. Our subsidiaries only pay dividends if and when declared by the respective subsidiary board. Moreover, GSWC and BVESI are obligated to give first priority to their own capital requirements and to maintain capital structures consistent with those determined to be reasonable by the CPUC in its most recent decisions on capital structure for both GSWC and BVESI in order that customers not be adversely affected by the holding company structure. Furthermore, our right to receive cash or other assets in the unlikely event of liquidation or reorganization of any of our subsidiaries is generally subject to the prior claims of creditors of that subsidiary. If we are unable to obtain funds from a subsidiary in a timely manner, we may be unable to meet our financial obligations, make additional investments or pay dividends.
The final determination of our income tax liability may be materially different from our income tax provision
Significant judgment is required in determining our provision for income taxes. Our calculation of the provision for income taxes is subject to our interpretation of applicable tax laws in the jurisdictions in which we file. In addition, our income tax returns are subject to periodic examination by the Internal Revenue Service and other taxing authorities.
Although we believe our income tax estimates are appropriate, there is no assurance that the final determination of our current taxes payable will not be materially different, either higher or lower, from the amounts reflected in our financial statements. In the event we are assessed additional income taxes, our financial condition and cash flows could be adversely affected.
Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments
None.
20
Item 2. Properties
Water Properties
As of December 31, 2019,2020, GSWC’s physical properties consisted of water transmission and distribution systems which included 2,7912,795 miles of pipeline together with services, meters and fire hydrants and approximately 450 parcels of land, generally less than one1 acre each, on which are located wells, pumping plants, reservoirs and other water utility facilities, including fourthree surface water treatment plants. GSWC also has franchises, easements and other rights of way for the purpose of accessing wells and tanks and constructing and using pipes and appurtenances for transmitting and distributing water. All of GSWC's properties are located in California.
As of December 31, 2019,2020, GSWC owned 240 wells, of which 186165 are active with an aggregate production capacity of approximately 187174 million gallons per day. GSWC has 58 connections to the water distribution facilities of the MWD and other municipal water agencies. GSWC’s storage reservoirs and tanks have an aggregate capacity of approximately 112.4113.9 million gallons. GSWC owns no dams. The following table provides information regarding the water utility plant of GSWC:
| Pumps | Distribution Facilities | Reservoirs | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Well | Booster | Mains* | Services | Hydrants | Tanks | Capacity* | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 240 | 382 | 2,795 | 261,975 | 26,493 | 140 | 113.9 | (1) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Pumps | Distribution Facilities | Reservoirs | ||||||||||||||||||
| Well | Booster | Mains* | Services | Hydrants | Tanks | Capacity* | ||||||||||||||
| 240 | 385 | 2,791 | 260,920 | 26,369 | 140 | 112.4 | (1) | |||||||||||||
* Reservoir capacity is measured in millions of gallons. Mains are in miles.
(1) GSWC has additional capacity in its Bay Point system, and in its Cordova system through an exclusive capacity rightsright to use 4.4 million gallons per day from a treatment plant owned by the Contra Costa Water District, and a capacity right to use 4.5 million gallons per day from a treatment plant owned by the Carmichael Water District, respectively.District. GSWC also has additional reservoir capacity through an exclusive right to use all of one eight-million-gallon8 million gallon reservoir, one-half of another eight-million-gallon8 million gallon reservoir, and one-half of a treatment plant’s capacity, all owned by the Three Valleys Municipal Water District and used to serve the cities of Claremont and San Dimas.District.
Electric Properties
Adjudicated and Other Water Rights
GSWC owns groundwater and surface water rights in California. Groundwater rights are further subject to classification as either adjudicated or unadjudicated rights. Adjudicated rights have been established through comprehensive litigation in the courts, and the annual extraction quantities and use of the adjudicated rights are often subject to the provisions of the judgment for that particular groundwater basin. Additionally, as a result of the adjudication, many of these groundwater basins are managed by a watermaster that is charged with enforcing the provisions of the judgment, which may include determining operating safe yields based on the water supply conditions of the groundwater basin.
GSWC actively manages its adjudicated groundwater rights portfolio to ensure thatwith the goal of optimizing and making this source of supply is optimized and is sustainable. Unadjudicated rights are subject to further regulation by the State Water Resources Control Board (“SWRCB”) and the California Department of Water Resources. Surface water rights are quantified and managed by the SWRCB, unless the surface water rights originated prior to 1914. As of December 31, 2019,2020, GSWC had adjudicated groundwater rights and surface water rights of 72,39971,670 and 11,335 acre-feet per year, respectively. GSWC also has a number of unadjudicated groundwater rights, which have not been quantified, but are typically measured by historical usage.
Office Buildings
GSWC owns its general headquarters facility in San Dimas, California. GSWC also owns and leases customer service offices and office space throughout California. BVESI owns office space in California. ASUS leases office facilities in Georgia, Virginia, Texas and North Carolina, and owns service centers in Florida, Maryland, South Carolina, Virginia, Texas, North Carolina and Kansas.
Mortgage and Other Liens
As of December 31, 2019,2020, neither AWR, GSWC, BVESI, ASUS, nor any of its subsidiaries, had any mortgage debt or liens securing indebtedness outstanding. Under the terms of certain debt instruments, AWR, GSWC and GSWCBVESI are prohibited from issuing any secured debt, without providing equal and ratable security to the holders of this existing debt.
21
Condemnation of Properties
The laws of the state of California provide for the acquisition of public utility property by governmental agencies through their power of eminent domain, also known as condemnation, where doing so constitutes a more necessary use. In addition, these laws provide that the owner of utility property (i) may contest whether the condemnation is actually necessary, and (ii) is entitled to receive the fair market value of its property if the property is ultimately taken.
Environmental Clean-Up and Remediation of Properties
GSWC has been involved in environmental remediation and clean-up at aone of its plant site ("Chadron Plant")sites that contained an underground storage tank, which was used to store gasoline for its vehicles. This tank was removed from the ground in July 1990 along with the dispenser and ancillary piping. Since then, GSWC has been involved in various remediation activities at this site.
GSWC has accrued an estimated liability, which includes costs for two years of continued activities of cleanup and monitoring, and site-closure-related activities. The ultimate cost may vary as there are many unknowns in remediation of underground gasoline spills and this is an estimate based on currently available information. Management believes it is probable that the estimated additional costs will continue to be approved for inclusion in rate base by the CPUC.
Item 3. Legal Proceedings
Registrant is subject to ordinary routine litigation incidental to its business, some of which may include claims for compensatory and punitive damages. Management believes that rate recovery, proper insurance coverage and reserves are in place to insure against, among other things, property, general liability, employment, and workers’ compensation claims incurred in the ordinary course of business. Insurance coverage may not cover certain claims involving punitive damages.
Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosure
Not applicable.
22
PART II
Item 5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
Stock Performance Graph
The graph below compares the cumulative 5-year total return on American States Water Company's Common Shares relative to the cumulative total returns of the S&P 500 index and a peer group of seven publicly traded companies headquartered in the United States. The seven companies included in the Company's customized peer group are: American Water Works Company Inc., Aqua AmericaEssential Utilities, Inc., Artesian Resources Corporation, California Water Service Group, Middlesex Water Company, York Water Company and SJW Group.
An investment of $100 (with reinvestment of all dividends) is assumed to have been made in our Common Shares, and in the common stock in the index and in the peer group on December 31, 2014.2015. Relative performance is tracked through December 31, 2019.2020.
COMPARISON OF 5 YEAR CUMULATIVE TOTAL RETURN*
*$100 invested on December 31, 20142015 in stock or index, including reinvestment of dividends.
Fiscal year ending December 31.
Copyright© 20202021 Standard & Poor's, a division of S&P Global. All rights reserved
| 12/2015 | 12/2016 | 12/2017 | 12/2018 | 12/2019 | 12/2020 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| American States Water Company | $ | 100.00 | $ | 111.01 | $ | 144.05 | $ | 169.85 | $ | 222.82 | $ | 207.76 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| S&P 500 | $ | 100.00 | $ | 111.96 | $ | 136.40 | $ | 130.42 | $ | 171.49 | $ | 203.04 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Peer Group | $ | 100.00 | $ | 123.10 | $ | 157.64 | $ | 155.84 | $ | 210.31 | $ | 246.13 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| 12/2014 | 12/2015 | 12/2016 | 12/2017 | 12/2018 | 12/2019 | ||||||||||||||||||
| American States Water Company | $ | 100.00 | $ | 113.91 | $ | 126.45 | $ | 164.09 | $ | 193.48 | $ | 253.82 | |||||||||||
| S&P 500 | $ | 100.00 | $ | 101.38 | $ | 113.51 | $ | 138.29 | $ | 132.23 | $ | 173.86 | |||||||||||
| Peer Group | $ | 100.00 | $ | 112.91 | $ | 138.99 | $ | 177.99 | $ | 175.95 | $ | 237.45 | |||||||||||
The stock price performance included in this graph is not necessarily indicative of future stock price performance.
23
Market Information Relating to Common Shares
Common Shares of American States Water Company are traded on the New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”) under the symbol “AWR.” The intra-day high and low NYSE prices on the Common Shares for each quarter during the past two years were:
| Stock Prices | ||||||||||||||||||
| Stock Prices | High | Low | ||||||||||||||||
| 2020 | 2020 | |||||||||||||||||
| First Quarter | First Quarter | $ | 96.64 | $ | 65.11 | |||||||||||||
| Second Quarter | Second Quarter | $ | 91.11 | $ | 72.88 | |||||||||||||
| Third Quarter | Third Quarter | $ | 82.19 | $ | 69.25 | |||||||||||||
| Fourth Quarter | Fourth Quarter | $ | 80.94 | $ | 71.84 | |||||||||||||
| High | Low | |||||||||||||||||
| 2019 | 2019 | |||||||||||||||||
| First Quarter | $ | 72.50 | $ | 63.27 | First Quarter | $ | 72.50 | $ | 63.27 | |||||||||
| Second Quarter | $ | 76.43 | $ | 67.52 | Second Quarter | $ | 76.43 | $ | 67.52 | |||||||||
| Third Quarter | $ | 94.39 | $ | 73.64 | Third Quarter | $ | 94.39 | $ | 73.64 | |||||||||
| Fourth Quarter | $ | 96.00 | $ | 82.54 | Fourth Quarter | $ | 96.00 | $ | 82.54 | |||||||||
| 2018 | ||||||||||||||||||
| First Quarter | $ | 60.00 | $ | 50.16 | ||||||||||||||
| Second Quarter | $ | 58.82 | $ | 51.30 | ||||||||||||||
| Third Quarter | $ | 61.66 | $ | 57.13 | ||||||||||||||
| Fourth Quarter | $ | 69.61 | $ | 58.48 | ||||||||||||||
The closing price of the Common Shares of American States Water Company on the NYSE on February 20, 202019, 2021 was $90.23.$77.97.
Approximate Number of Holders of Common Shares
As of February 20, 2020,19, 2021, there were 2,1352,081 holders of record of the 36,859,50536,898,213 outstanding Common Shares of American States Water Company. AWR owns all of the outstanding Common Shares of GSWC, BVESI and ASUS. ASUS owns all of the outstanding stock of the Military Utility Privatization Subsidiaries.
Frequency and Amount of Any Dividends Declared and Dividend Restrictions
For the last two years, AWR has paid dividends on its Common Shares on or about March 1, June 1, September 1 and December 1. The following table lists the amounts of dividends paid on Common Shares of American States Water Company:
| 2019 | 2018 | 2020 | 2019 | |||||||||||||||
| First Quarter | $ | 0.275 | $ | 0.255 | First Quarter | $ | 0.305 | $ | 0.275 | |||||||||
| Second Quarter | $ | 0.275 | $ | 0.255 | Second Quarter | $ | 0.305 | $ | 0.275 | |||||||||
| Third Quarter | $ | 0.305 | $ | 0.275 | Third Quarter | $ | 0.335 | $ | 0.305 | |||||||||
| Fourth Quarter | $ | 0.305 | $ | 0.275 | Fourth Quarter | $ | 0.335 | $ | 0.305 | |||||||||
| Total | $ | 1.160 | $ | 1.060 | Total | $ | 1.280 | $ | 1.160 | |||||||||
AWR’s ability to pay dividends is subject to the requirement in its revolving credit facility to maintain compliance with all covenants described in footnote (14) to the table in the section entitled “Contractual Obligations, Commitments and Off-Balance Sheet ArrangementsNote 9 Bank Debt” included in Part II, Item 7,8, in Management’s Discussion and Analysis ofthe Notes to Consolidated Financial Condition and Results of Operation.Statements. GSWC’s maximum ability to pay dividends is restricted by certain Note Agreements to the sum of $21.0 million plus 100% of consolidated net income from certain dates plus the aggregate net cash proceeds received from capital stock offerings or other instruments convertible into capital stock from various dates. Under the most restrictive of the Note Agreements, $473.9$576.4 million was available from GSWC to pay dividends to AWR as of December 31, 2019.2020. GSWC is also prohibited under the terms of senior notes from paying dividends if, after giving effect to the dividend, its total indebtedness to capitalization ratio (as defined) would be more than 0.6667-to-1. GSWC would have to issue additional debt of $661.4 million to invoke this covenant as of December 31, 2019.2020.
Under California law, AWR, GSWC, BVESI and ASUS are each permitted to distribute dividends to its shareholders and repurchase its shares so long as the Board of Directors determines, in good faith, that either: (i) the value of the corporation’s assets equals or exceeds the sum of its total liabilities immediately after the dividend, or (ii) its retained earnings equals or exceeds the amount of the distribution.
24
Under the least restrictive of the California tests, approximately $346.0$385.0 million was available to pay dividends to AWR’s common shareholders and repurchase shares from AWR’s common shareholders at December 31, 2019.2020. Approximately $257.4$583.3 million was available for GSWC to pay dividends to AWR at December 31, 20192020, and approximately $62.1$62.8 million was available for ASUSBVESI to pay dividends to AWR at December 31, 2019. However,2020. ASUS's ability to pay dividends to AWR is further subject todepended upon the ability of each of its subsidiariesthe Military Utility Privatization Subsidiaries to pay dividends to it, which may, in turn, be restricted by the lawsASUS under theapplicable state in which the applicable subsidiary was formed.law as well as ASUS's ability to pay dividends under California law.
AWR paid $42.7$47.2 million in dividends to shareholders for the year ended December 31, 2019,2020, as compared to $38.9$42.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2018.2019. GSWC paid dividends of $20.2 million and $68.9 million to AWR in 2019 and 2018, respectively. ASUS paid dividends of $22.5 million and $10.1$20.2 million to AWR in 2020 and 2019, respectively. BVESI paid dividends of $12.4 million to AWR in 2020. ASUS paid dividends of $12.4 million and 2018,$22.5 million to AWR in 2020 and 2019, respectively.
Other Information
The shareholders of AWR have approved the material features of all equity-compensation plans under which AWR directly issues equity securities. AWR did not directly issue any unregistered equity securities during 2019.2020.
The following table provides information about AWR repurchases of its Common Shares during the fourth quarter of 2019:2020:
| Period | Total Number of Shares Purchased | Average Price Paid per Share | Total Number of Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans or Programs (1) | Maximum Number of Shares That May Yet Be Purchased under the Plans or Programs (1)(3) | |||||||||
| October 1 - 31, 2019 | 473 | $ | 93.99 | — | — | ||||||||
| November 1 - 30, 2019 | 20,763 | $ | 88.05 | — | — | ||||||||
| December 1 - 31, 2019 | 2,670 | $ | 85.25 | — | — | ||||||||
| Total | 23,906 | (2) | $ | 87.85 | — | ||||||||
| Period | Total Number of Shares Purchased | Average Price Paid per Share | Total Number of Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans or Programs (1) | Maximum Number of Shares That May Yet Be Purchased under the Plans or Programs (1)(3) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| October 1 - 31, 2020 | 545 | $ | 78.07 | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||||
| November 1 - 30, 2020 | 270 | $ | 77.21 | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||||
| December 1 - 31, 2020 | 2,690 | $ | 75.32 | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Total | 3,505 | (2) | $ | 75.89 | — | |||||||||||||||||||||
(1) None of the Common Shares were repurchased pursuant to any publicly announced stock repurchase program.
(2) Of this amount, 20,235None of the Common Shares were acquired on the open market for employees pursuant to the 401(k) Plan and the remainderPlan. All of the Common Sharesshares were acquired on the open market for participants in the Common Share Purchase and Dividend Reinvestment Plan.
(3) Neither the 401(k) plan nor the Common Share Purchase and Dividend Reinvestment Plan contains a maximum number of common shares that may be purchased in the open market.
25
Item 6. Selected Financial Data
AMERICAN STATES WATER COMPANY (AWR):
| (in thousands, except per share amounts) | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 (1) | 2016 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Income Statement Information: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total Operating Revenues | $ | 488,243 | $ | 473,869 | $ | 436,816 | $ | 440,603 | $ | 436,087 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Total Operating Expenses (3) | 357,744 | 346,796 | 335,833 | 313,508 | 321,895 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Operating Income (3) | 130,499 | 127,073 | 100,983 | 127,095 | 114,192 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Interest Expense | 22,531 | 24,586 | 23,433 | 22,582 | 21,992 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Interest Income | 1,801 | 3,249 | 3,578 | 1,790 | 757 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Net Income | $ | 86,425 | $ | 84,342 | $ | 63,871 | $ | 69,367 | $ | 59,743 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Basic Earnings per Common Share | $ | 2.34 | $ | 2.28 | $ | 1.73 | $ | 1.88 | $ | 1.63 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Fully Diluted Earnings per Common Share | $ | 2.33 | $ | 2.28 | $ | 1.72 | $ | 1.88 | $ | 1.62 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Average Shares Outstanding | 36,880 | 36,814 | 36,733 | 36,638 | 36,552 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Average number of Diluted Shares Outstanding | 36,995 | 36,964 | 36,936 | 36,844 | 36,750 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Dividends paid per Common Share | $ | 1.280 | $ | 1.160 | $ | 1.060 | $ | 0.994 | $ | 0.914 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Balance Sheet Information: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total Assets | $ | 1,791,603 | $ | 1,641,331 | $ | 1,501,433 | $ | 1,416,734 | $ | 1,470,493 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Common Shareholders’ Equity | 641,673 | 601,530 | 558,223 | 529,945 | 494,297 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Long-Term Debt | 440,348 | 280,996 | 281,087 | 321,039 | 320,981 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total Capitalization | $ | 1,082,021 | $ | 882,526 | $ | 839,310 | $ | 850,984 | $ | 815,278 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| (in thousands, except per share amounts) | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 (1) | 2016 | 2015 | |||||||||||||||
| Income Statement Information: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Total Operating Revenues | $ | 473,869 | $ | 436,816 | $ | 440,603 | $ | 436,087 | $ | 458,641 | ||||||||||
Total Operating Expenses (2) | 346,796 | 335,833 | 313,508 | 321,895 | 339,721 | |||||||||||||||
Operating Income (2) | 127,073 | 100,983 | 127,095 | 114,192 | 118,920 | |||||||||||||||
| Interest Expense | 24,586 | 23,433 | 22,582 | 21,992 | 21,088 | |||||||||||||||
| Interest Income | 3,249 | 3,578 | 1,790 | 757 | 458 | |||||||||||||||
| Net Income | $ | 84,342 | $ | 63,871 | $ | 69,367 | $ | 59,743 | $ | 60,484 | ||||||||||
| Basic Earnings per Common Share | $ | 2.28 | $ | 1.73 | $ | 1.88 | $ | 1.63 | $ | 1.61 | ||||||||||
| Fully Diluted Earnings per Common Share | $ | 2.28 | $ | 1.72 | $ | 1.88 | $ | 1.62 | $ | 1.60 | ||||||||||
| Average Shares Outstanding | 36,814 | 36,733 | 36,638 | 36,552 | 37,389 | |||||||||||||||
| Average number of Diluted Shares Outstanding | 36,964 | 36,936 | 36,844 | 36,750 | 37,614 | |||||||||||||||
| Dividends paid per Common Share | $ | 1.160 | $ | 1.060 | $ | 0.994 | $ | 0.914 | $ | 0.874 | ||||||||||
| Balance Sheet Information: | ||||||||||||||||||||
Total Assets (3) | $ | 1,641,331 | $ | 1,501,433 | $ | 1,416,734 | $ | 1,470,493 | $ | 1,343,959 | ||||||||||
| Common Shareholders’ Equity | 601,530 | 558,223 | 529,945 | 494,297 | 465,945 | |||||||||||||||
Long-Term Debt (3) | 280,996 | 281,087 | 321,039 | 320,981 | 320,900 | |||||||||||||||
| Total Capitalization | $ | 882,526 | $ | 839,310 | $ | 850,984 | $ | 815,278 | $ | 786,845 | ||||||||||
GOLDEN STATE WATER COMPANY (GSWC):
| (in thousands) | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 (1) | 2016 | 2015 | |||||||||||||||
| Income Statement Information: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Total Operating Revenues | $ | 359,378 | $ | 329,608 | $ | 340,301 | $ | 338,702 | $ | 364,550 | ||||||||||
Total Operating Expenses (2) | 254,286 | 249,046 | 234,430 | 243,515 | 263,887 | |||||||||||||||
Operating Income (2) | 105,092 | 80,562 | 105,871 | 95,187 | 100,663 | |||||||||||||||
| Interest Expense | 23,399 | 22,621 | 22,055 | 21,782 | 20,998 | |||||||||||||||
| Interest Income | 1,867 | 2,890 | 1,766 | 749 | 440 | |||||||||||||||
| Net Income | $ | 66,663 | $ | 48,012 | $ | 53,757 | $ | 46,969 | $ | 47,591 | ||||||||||
| Balance Sheet Information: | ||||||||||||||||||||
Total Assets (3) | $ | 1,522,454 | $ | 1,389,222 | $ | 1,326,823 | $ | 1,384,178 | $ | 1,271,879 | ||||||||||
| Common Shareholder’s Equity | 551,188 | 503,575 | 474,374 | 446,770 | 423,730 | |||||||||||||||
Long-Term Debt (3) | 280,996 | 281,087 | 321,039 | 320,981 | 320,900 | |||||||||||||||
| Total Capitalization | $ | 832,184 | $ | 784,662 | $ | 795,413 | $ | 767,751 | $ | 744,630 | ||||||||||
| (in thousands) | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 (1) | 2016 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Income Statement Information: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total Operating Revenues (2) | $ | 349,284 | $ | 359,378 | $ | 329,608 | $ | 340,301 | $ | 338,702 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Total Operating Expenses (2) (3) | 246,388 | 254,286 | 249,046 | 234,430 | 243,515 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Operating Income (2) (3) | 102,896 | 105,092 | 80,562 | 105,871 | 95,187 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Interest Expense | 21,495 | 23,399 | 22,621 | 22,055 | 21,782 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Interest Income | 718 | 1,867 | 2,890 | 1,766 | 749 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net Income (2) | $ | 64,971 | $ | 66,663 | $ | 48,012 | $ | 53,757 | $ | 46,969 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Balance Sheet Information: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total Assets (2) | $ | 1,560,782 | $ | 1,522,454 | $ | 1,389,222 | $ | 1,326,823 | $ | 1,384,178 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Common Shareholder’s Equity (2) | 583,298 | 551,188 | 503,575 | 474,374 | 446,770 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Long-Term Debt | 440,348 | 280,996 | 281,087 | 321,039 | 320,981 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total Capitalization | $ | 1,023,646 | $ | 832,184 | $ | 784,662 | $ | 795,413 | $ | 767,751 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
(1) 2017 results include an $8.3 million pretax gain, or $0.13 per share, from the sale of GSWC's Ojai water system.
26
Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operation
The following discussion and analysis provides information on AWR’s consolidated operations and assets, and, where necessary, includes specific references to AWR’s individual segments and/or its subsidiaries: GSWC, BVESI and ASUS and its subsidiaries. subsidiaries, and AWR (parent) where applicable. On July 1, 2020, GSWC completed the transfer of the electric utility assets and liabilities from its electric division to BVESI in exchange for common shares of BVESI.GSWC then immediately distributed all of BVESI's common shares to AWR, whereupon BVESI became wholly owned directly by AWR.The reorganization is not expected to result in any substantive changes to AWR's operations or business segments.
Included in the following analysis is a discussion of water and electric gross margins. Water and electric gross margins are computed by subtracting total supply costs from total revenues. Registrant uses these gross margins as important measures in evaluating its operating results. Registrant believes these measures are useful internal benchmarks in evaluating the performance of GSWC.
GSWC and BVESI. The discussions and tables included in the following analysis also present Registrant’s operations in terms of earnings per share by business segment. Registrant believes that the disclosuresegment and AWR (parent), which equals each business segment's earnings divided by Registrant's weighted average number of earnings per share by business segment provides investors with clarity surrounding the performance of its different services.diluted common shares. Furthermore, the retroactive earnings impact forrelated to fiscal 2018 resulting from the CPUC's final decision on the electric general rate case issued in August 2019, has been excluded when communicating the electric segment's 2019 financial results to help facilitate comparisons of the company’sRegistrant’s performance from period to period. All of these items are derived from consolidated financial information but are not presented in our financial statements that are prepared in accordance with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP) in the United States.These items constitute "non-GAAP financial measures" under the Securities and Exchange Commission rules.
Registrant believes that the disclosure of the water and electric gross margins, and earnings per share by business segment provide investors with clarity surrounding the performance of its segments. Registrant reviews these measurements regularly and compares them to historical periods and to its operating budget. However, these measures, which are not presented in accordance with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (“GAAP”),GAAP, may not be comparable to similarly titled measures used by other enterprises and should not be considered as an alternative to operating income or earnings per share, which are determined in accordance with GAAP. A reconciliation of water and electric gross margins to the most directly comparable GAAP measures is included in the table under the section titled “Operating Expenses: Supply Costs.” Reconciliations to AWR’s diluted earnings per share are included in the discussions under the sections titled “Summary Results by Segment.”
Overview
Factors affecting our financial performance are summarized under Forward-Looking Information.
Water and Electric Segments:
GSWC's and BVESI's revenues, operating income, and cash flows are earned primarily through delivering potable water to homes and businesses in California and the delivery of electricity in the Big Bear area of San Bernardino County, California.California, respectively. Rates charged to GSWC and BVESI customers are determined by the CPUC. These rates are intended to allow recovery of operating costs and a reasonable rate of return on capital. GSWC plansand BVESI plan to continue to seekseeking additional rate increases in future years from the CPUC to recover operating and supply costs, and receive reasonable returns on invested capital. Capital expenditures in future years at GSWC and BVESI are expected to remain at substantially higher levels than depreciation expense. When necessary, GSWC obtainsand BVESI may obtain funds from external sources in the capital markets and through bank borrowings.
General Rate Case Filings and Other Matters:
Water Segment:General Rate Case for years 2022 - 2024:
Water General Rate Case for years 2019 - 2021. On– 2021:
In May 30, 2019, the CPUC issued a final decision on GSWC's water general rate case, which determined new rates for the years 2019 – 2021 with rates retroactive to January 1, 2019.Among other things, the final decision approves in its entirety an August 2018 settlement agreement that had been entered into between GSWC and the CPUC’s Public Advocates Office. As a result, the final decision authorizesauthorized GSWC to invest approximately $334.5 million over the rate cycle.The $334.5 million of infrastructure investment includesincluded $20.4 million of capital projects to be filed for revenue recovery through advice letters when those projects are completed.
27
Final Decision on Low-Income Affordability Rulemaking:
On August 27, 2020, the CPUC issued a final decision in the first phase of the CPUC’s Order Instituting Rulemaking evaluating the low income ratepayer assistance and affordability objectives contained in the CPUC’s 2010 Water Action Plan, which also addressed other issues, including the continued use of the Water Revenue Adjustment Mechanism ("WRAM") by California water utilities.The final decision also addressed the continued use of the Modified Cost Balancing Account ("MCBA"), which is a full-cost balancing account used to track the resultsdifference between adopted and actual water supply costs (including the effects of an earnings testchanges in both rates and changes tovolume).Based on the forecasted inflationary index values.
The final decision will not have any impact on GSWC's WRAM or MCBA balances during the current rate cycle (2019 – 2021).In addition, management believes that the decision supports GSWC’s position that it does not apply to its general rate case application filed in July 2020 that will set new electric rates for the years 2018 through 2021.2022 – 2024. In November 2018, GSWCFebruary 2021, a procedural hearing in this pending general rate case was held, and the Public Advocates Officeassigned administrative law judge in the proceeding agreed that GSWC is entitled to keep the use of the WRAM and MCBA through the year 2024. GSWC’s next general rate case application will be filed in 2023 to establish new rates for the years 2025 - 2027 and, based on the August 27, 2020 decision, may not include the WRAM or MCBA for those years. Since its implementation in 2008, the WRAM and MCBA have helped mitigate fluctuations in GSWC’s earnings due to changes in water consumption by its customers or changes in water supply mix.Replacing them with mechanisms recommended in the final decision will likely result in more volatility in GSWC’s future earnings and could result in less than or more than full recovery of its authorized water gross margin.On or prior to October 5, 2020, GSWC, other California water utilities, and the California Water Association filed separate applications for rehearing on this matter.At this time, management cannot predict the outcome of this matter.
Cost of Capital Proceeding:
Investor-owned water utilities serving California are required to file their cost of capital applications on a triennial basis. GSWC’s next cost of capital application is scheduled to be filed by May 1, 2021 for the years 2022 - 2024. However, GSWC, along with three other investor-owned water utilities in California, filed a joint motion to adopt a settlement agreement between the two parties resolving all issues in connectionrequest with the generalCPUC on January 5, 2021 to postpone the cost of capital applications by another year. Last year the utilities sought a one-year deferral of the May 2020 cost of capital applications, which was approved in March 2020. Similar to that deferral, this year’s joint request asked that the utilities keep the cost of capital parameters as authorized in 2018 in effect through 2022, and file new cost of capital applications by May 1, 2022 to set the cost of debt, return on equity and capital structure starting January 1, 2023. GSWC’s current authorized rate case.of return on rate base is 7.91%, based on its weighted cost of capital, which will continue in effect through December 31, 2022 if the additional deferral is approved. At this time, management cannot predict the outcome of this request.
Electric Segment:
On August 15, 2019, the CPUC issued a final decision on thisthe electric general rate case, adopting the settlement agreement in its entirety.case. Among other things, the decision (i) extendsextended the rate cycle by one year (new rates were effective for 2018 - 2022); (ii) increasesincreased the electric gross margin for 2018 by approximately $2.3 million compared to the 2017 adopted electric gross margin, adjusted for Tax Acttax reform changes; (iii) authorizes BVESallows the electric segment to construct all the capital projects requested in its application, which are dedicated to improving system safety and reliability and total approximately $44 million over the 5-year rate cycle; and (iv) increasesincreased the adopted electric gross margin by $1.2 million for each of the years 2019 and 2020, by $1.1 million in 2021, and by $1.0 million in 2022. The rate increases for 2019 - 2022 are not subject to an earnings test. The decision authorizesauthorized a return on equity for GSWC'sthe electric segment of 9.60%, as compared to its previously authorized return of 9.95%9.6% and includesincluded a capital structure and debt cost that is consistent with those approved by the CPUC in March 2018 in connection with GSWC's water segment cost of capital proceeding. The rate case decision continues to apply to BVESI.
Due to the delay in finalizing the electric general rate case, electric revenues recognized during 2018the first six months of 2019 were based on 2017 adopted rates. Because the August 2019 CPUC final decision is retroactive to January 1, 2018, the cumulative retroactive earnings impact was recorded as part of fiscal 2019 results, which includes approximatelyincluding $0.04 per share relating to fiscal 2018.for the full year ended December 31, 2018 had the new 2018 and 2019 rates been in place at those times.
28
Contracted Services Segment:
ASUS's revenues, operating income and cash flows are earned by providing water and/or wastewater services, including operation and maintenance services and construction of facilities at the water and/or wastewater systems at various military installations, pursuant to 50-year firm fixed-price contracts. The contract price for each of these 50-year contracts is subject to annual economic price adjustments. Additional revenues generated by contract operations are primarily dependent on new construction activities under contract modifications with the U.S. government or agreements with other third-party prime contractors.
COVID-19:
The contract was awarded bypandemic has caused significant volatility in financial markets, resulting in significant fluctuations throughout 2020 in the U.S. government in September 2017 with afair value of $681plan assets in GSWC's pension and other retirement plans, which could continue.Furthermore, due to expected future credit losses on utility customer bills, GSWC and BVESI have increased their allowance for doubtful accounts as of December 31, 2020.However, the CPUC has authorized GSWC and BVESI to track incremental costs, including bad debt expense in excess of what is included in their respective revenue requirements, incurred as a result of the pandemic in COVID-19-related memorandum accounts, such as a Catastrophic Event Memorandum Account ("CEMA"), to be filed with the CPUC for future recovery.Through December 31, 2020, AWR has recorded approximately $4.4 million overin regulatory asset accounts related to bad debt expense in excess of GSWC’s and BVESI's revenue requirements, the purchase of personal protective equipment, and additional incurred printing costs and other incremental miscellaneous costs.By tracking these costs in the CPUC-approved memorandum accounts, GSWC and BVESI can later ask for recovery of these costs from the CPUC. CEMA and other emergency-type memorandum accounts are established as a 50-year period. The 50-year contract is also subject to annual economic price adjustments.result of a state/federal declared emergency, and are therefore recognized as regulatory assets for future recovery. As a result, the amounts recorded in the COVID-19-related memorandum accounts have not impacted GSWC's and BVESI's earnings in 2020. Thus far, the COVID-19 pandemic has not had a material impact on ASUS's operations.
Summary Results by Segment
The table below sets forth a comparison of the diluted earnings per share contribution by business segment and for AWR’s operations: the parent company for the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019.
| Diluted Earnings per Share | |||||||||||||||||
| Year Ended | |||||||||||||||||
| 12/31/2020 | 12/31/2019 | CHANGE | |||||||||||||||
| Water | $ | 1.66 | $ | 1.61 | $ | 0.05 | |||||||||||
| Electric, adjusted (2019 excludes retroactive impact of CPUC decision in the general rate case related to 2018) | 0.20 | 0.15 | 0.05 | ||||||||||||||
| Contracted services | 0.47 | 0.47 | — | ||||||||||||||
| AWR (parent) | — | 0.01 | (0.01) | ||||||||||||||
| Consolidated diluted earnings per share, adjusted | 2.33 | 2.24 | 0.09 | ||||||||||||||
| Retroactive impact of CPUC decision in the electric general rate case related to the full year of 2018 | — | 0.04 | (0.04) | ||||||||||||||
| Totals from operations, as reported | $ | 2.33 | $ | 2.28 | $ | 0.05 | |||||||||||
29
| Diluted Earnings per Share | |||||||||||
| Year Ended | |||||||||||
| 12/31/2019 | 12/31/2018 | CHANGE | |||||||||
| Water | $ | 1.61 | $ | 1.19 | $ | 0.42 | |||||
| Electric, adjusted (2019 excludes retroactive impact of CPUC decision in the general rate case related to 2018) | 0.15 | 0.11 | 0.04 | ||||||||
| Contracted services | 0.47 | 0.42 | 0.05 | ||||||||
| AWR (parent) | 0.01 | — | 0.01 | ||||||||
| Consolidated diluted earnings per share, adjusted | 2.24 | 1.72 | 0.52 | ||||||||
| Retroactive impact of CPUC decision in the electric general rate case related to the full year of 2018 | 0.04 | — | 0.04 | ||||||||
| Totals from operations, as reported | $ | 2.28 | $ | 1.72 | $ | 0.56 | |||||
Water Segment:
Diluted earnings per share from the water segment for the year ended December 31, 20192020 increased by $0.42$0.05 per share as compared to the same period in 2018 largely due to2019. Included in the approvalresults for 2019 was the impact of the May 2019 CPUC final decision on the water general rate case, which approved the recovery of previously incurred costs that were being tracked in May 2019CPUC-authorized memorandum accounts and effective January 1, 2019. Also includedresulted in the earnings for 2019 was a $1.1 million reduction to administrative and general expense positively impacting earnings byin 2019 of approximately $1.1 million, or $0.02 per share, which reflects the CPUC's approval receivedshare. There was no equivalent item in the general rate case for recovery of costs previously expensed as incurred and tracked in memorandum accounts.2020. Excluding this $0.02 per share impact,item, diluted earnings per share from the water segment for 20192020 increased by $0.40$0.07 per share due to the following items (excluding billed surcharges):
•An overall increase in the water gross margin, of $0.21which favorably impacted earnings by approximately $0.20 per share due largely as a result ofto new rates authorized by the May 2019 CPUC decision on the general rate case,CPUC. The water segment received its full second-year step increase effective January 1, 2020, which approved new water rates and adopted supply costs for 2019. The 2019 water revenue requirement has also been reduced to reflect a decreaseresulted in depreciation expense, due to a reductionan additional $10.4 million in the overall composite depreciation rates based on a revised study filed in the general rate case. The decrease in depreciation expense lowers the water gross margin and is offset by a corresponding decrease in depreciation expense, resulting in no impact to net earnings.for 2020.
•An overall decreaseincrease in operating expenses (excluding supply costs) increased, which negatively impacted earnings by approximately $0.11$0.08 per share due primarily to increases in large part, to lower depreciation expense. As discussed above, the lower depreciation expense is reflected in the new revenue requirement approved in the general rate case. There was also a decrease in administrative and general expenses primarily due to lower regulatory-related costs resulting from timing of the rate case cycle and when such costs are incurred. These decreases were partially offset by an overall increase in labor costs and other employee-related benefits, chemical and water treatment costs, insurance costs, regulatory costs, depreciation expense, and property and other taxes.
•An increase in interest and other income (net of interest expense), which increased earnings by approximately $0.05 per share due to gains generated during 2019 on Registrant's investments held to fund a retirement benefit plan, as compared to losses incurred during 2018 due to market conditions. These gains were partially offset by interest income on a federal tax refund recorded in 2018 with no similar item in 2019, and an increase in interest expense resulting from higher borrowings to fund a portion of GSWC’s capital expenditures.
A decrease in interest expense resulting from lower interest rates in 2020 compared to 2019 was largely offset by an overall net decrease in interest and other income including lower gains earned on investments held to fund one of the Company’s retirement plans during 2020 as compared to 2019. As previously discussed, the COVID-19 pandemic has, among other things, increased volatility in the financial markets, which resulted in fluctuations throughout 2020 in the fair value of these investments.
Electric Segment:
Diluted earnings per share from the electric segment for 2020 was $0.20 per share as compared to $0.19 per share recorded for 2019. The CPUC's August 2019 final decision on the electric general rate case set new rates for 2018 through 2022 and was retroactive to January 1, 2018. As a result, the retroactive impact of the new electric rates for all of fiscal 2018 has been reflectedwas included in the results for 2019. Of the electric segment's $0.19 earnings per share earnings contribution for the year ended December 31, 2019, approximately $0.04 per share relatesrelated to the full year ended December 31, 2018, which is shown on a separate line in the table above.
Excluding the retroactive impact related to 2018 from 2019 earnings due to the CPUC's August 2019 final rate case decision, diluted earnings from the electric segment for 20192020 were $0.15$0.20 per share as compared to $0.11$0.15 per share for the same period in 2018.2019. The increase was due to a higher electric gross margin as a result of new rates authorized by the CPUC's August 2019 final decision, partially offset by an increase in operating expensesas well as lower interest expense and a higherlower effective income tax rate as compared to 2018 due to changes in certain flow-through taxes.taxes as compared to 2019. These increases to earnings were partially offset by an overall increase in operating expenses.
Contracted Services Segment:
For the yearboth years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019, diluted earnings from contracted services were $0.47 per share. Included in the results for 2019 were retroactive revenues resulting from the successful resolution of an economic price adjustment at one of the military bases served, which totaled approximately $0.01 per share and related to periods prior to 2019.Excluding this retroactive amount, diluted earnings from the contracted services segment for 2020 increased by $0.01 per share as compared to $0.42 per share for the same period in 2018. This was2019 largely due in part, to the commencement of operations at Fort Riley in July 2018. There was also an increase in management fees at several other military bases due to the successful resolution of various price adjustments during 2018fee and 2019.construction revenues, and lower overall operating expenses, partially offset by higher construction costs.
AWR (parent)(Parent):
For the year ended December 31, 2019,2020, diluted earnings from AWR (parent) increaseddecreased $0.01 per share compared to 20182019 due primarily to changes in state unitary taxes.
The following discussion and analysis for the years ended December 31, 20192020 and 20182019 provides information on AWR’s consolidated operations and assets and, where necessary, includes specific references to AWR’s individual segments and subsidiaries: GSWC, BVESI and ASUS and its subsidiaries.
30
Consolidated Results of Operations — Years Ended December 31, 20192020 and 20182019 (amounts in thousands, except per share amounts):
| Year Ended | Year Ended | $ | % | ||||||||||||||||||||
| 12/31/2020 | 12/31/2019 | CHANGE | CHANGE | ||||||||||||||||||||
| OPERATING REVENUES | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Water | $ | 330,637 | $ | 319,830 | $ | 10,807 | 3.4 | % | |||||||||||||||
| Electric | 37,024 | 39,548 | (2,524) | -6.4 | % | ||||||||||||||||||
| Contracted services | 120,582 | 114,491 | 6,091 | 5.3 | % | ||||||||||||||||||
| Total operating revenues | 488,243 | 473,869 | 14,374 | 3.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||||
| OPERATING EXPENSES | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Water purchased | 74,554 | 72,289 | 2,265 | 3.1 | % | ||||||||||||||||||
| Power purchased for pumping | 10,134 | 8,660 | 1,474 | 17.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||||
| Groundwater production assessment | 20,392 | 18,962 | 1,430 | 7.5 | % | ||||||||||||||||||
| Power purchased for resale | 10,423 | 11,796 | (1,373) | -11.6 | % | ||||||||||||||||||
| Supply cost balancing accounts | (11,803) | (7,026) | (4,777) | 68.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||||
| Other operation | 33,236 | 32,756 | 480 | 1.5 | % | ||||||||||||||||||
| Administrative and general | 83,615 | 83,034 | 581 | 0.7 | % | ||||||||||||||||||
| Depreciation and amortization | 36,850 | 35,397 | 1,453 | 4.1 | % | ||||||||||||||||||
| Maintenance | 15,702 | 15,466 | 236 | 1.5 | % | ||||||||||||||||||
| Property and other taxes | 22,199 | 20,042 | 2,157 | 10.8 | % | ||||||||||||||||||
| ASUS construction | 62,411 | 55,673 | 6,738 | 12.1 | % | ||||||||||||||||||
| Loss (gain) on sale of assets | 31 | (253) | 284 | -112.3 | % | ||||||||||||||||||
| Total operating expenses | 357,744 | 346,796 | 10,948 | 3.2 | % | ||||||||||||||||||
| OPERATING INCOME | 130,499 | 127,073 | 3,426 | 2.7 | % | ||||||||||||||||||
| OTHER INCOME AND EXPENSES | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Interest expense | (22,531) | (24,586) | 2,055 | -8.4 | % | ||||||||||||||||||
| Interest income | 1,801 | 3,249 | (1,448) | -44.6 | % | ||||||||||||||||||
| Other, net | 4,853 | 3,276 | 1,577 | 48.1 | % | ||||||||||||||||||
| (15,877) | (18,061) | 2,184 | -12.1 | % | |||||||||||||||||||
| INCOME FROM OPERATIONS BEFORE INCOME TAX EXPENSE | 114,622 | 109,012 | 5,610 | 5.1 | % | ||||||||||||||||||
| Income tax expense | 28,197 | 24,670 | 3,527 | 14.3 | % | ||||||||||||||||||
| NET INCOME | $ | 86,425 | $ | 84,342 | $ | 2,083 | 2.5 | % | |||||||||||||||
| Basic earnings per Common Share | $ | 2.34 | $ | 2.28 | $ | 0.06 | 2.6 | % | |||||||||||||||
| Fully diluted earnings per Common Share | $ | 2.33 | $ | 2.28 | $ | 0.05 | 2.2 | % | |||||||||||||||
31
| Year Ended | Year Ended | $ | % | |||||||||||
| 12/31/2019 | 12/31/2018 | CHANGE | CHANGE | |||||||||||
| OPERATING REVENUES | ||||||||||||||
| Water | $ | 319,830 | $ | 295,258 | $ | 24,572 | 8.3 | % | ||||||
| Electric | 39,548 | 34,350 | 5,198 | 15.1 | % | |||||||||
| Contracted services | 114,491 | 107,208 | 7,283 | 6.8 | % | |||||||||
| Total operating revenues | 473,869 | 436,816 | 37,053 | 8.5 | % | |||||||||
| OPERATING EXPENSES | ||||||||||||||
| Water purchased | 72,289 | 68,904 | 3,385 | 4.9 | % | |||||||||
| Power purchased for pumping | 8,660 | 8,971 | (311 | ) | -3.5 | % | ||||||||
| Groundwater production assessment | 18,962 | 19,440 | (478 | ) | -2.5 | % | ||||||||
| Power purchased for resale | 11,796 | 11,590 | 206 | 1.8 | % | |||||||||
| Supply cost balancing accounts | (7,026 | ) | (15,649 | ) | 8,623 | -55.1 | % | |||||||
| Other operation | 32,756 | 31,650 | 1,106 | 3.5 | % | |||||||||
| Administrative and general | 83,034 | 82,595 | 439 | 0.5 | % | |||||||||
| Depreciation and amortization | 35,397 | 40,425 | (5,028 | ) | -12.4 | % | ||||||||
| Maintenance | 15,466 | 15,682 | (216 | ) | -1.4 | % | ||||||||
| Property and other taxes | 20,042 | 18,404 | 1,638 | 8.9 | % | |||||||||
| ASUS construction | 55,673 | 53,906 | 1,767 | 3.3 | % | |||||||||
| Gain on sale of assets | (253 | ) | (85 | ) | (168 | ) | 197.6 | % | ||||||
| Total operating expenses | 346,796 | 335,833 | 10,963 | 3.3 | % | |||||||||
| OPERATING INCOME | 127,073 | 100,983 | 26,090 | 25.8 | % | |||||||||
| OTHER INCOME AND EXPENSES | ||||||||||||||
| Interest expense | (24,586 | ) | (23,433 | ) | (1,153 | ) | 4.9 | % | ||||||
| Interest income | 3,249 | 3,578 | (329 | ) | -9.2 | % | ||||||||
| Other, net | 3,276 | 760 | 2,516 | 331.1 | % | |||||||||
| (18,061 | ) | (19,095 | ) | 1,034 | -5.4 | % | ||||||||
| INCOME FROM OPERATIONS BEFORE INCOME TAX EXPENSE | 109,012 | 81,888 | 27,124 | 33.1 | % | |||||||||
| Income tax expense | 24,670 | 18,017 | 6,653 | 36.9 | % | |||||||||
| NET INCOME | $ | 84,342 | $ | 63,871 | $ | 20,471 | 32.1 | % | ||||||
| Basic earnings per Common Share | $ | 2.28 | $ | 1.73 | $ | 0.55 | 31.8 | % | ||||||
| Fully diluted earnings per Common Share | $ | 2.28 | $ | 1.72 | $ | 0.56 | 32.6 | % | ||||||
Operating Revenues
General
GSWC reliesand BVESI rely upon approvals by the CPUC offor rate increases to recover operating expenses and to provide for a return on invested and borrowed capital used to fund utility plant. RegistrantASUS relies on economic price and equitable adjustments by the U.S. government in order to recover operating expenses and provide a profit margin for ASUS.margin. Current operating revenues and earnings can be negatively impacted if the Military Utility Privatization Subsidiaries do not receive adequate price increases or adjustments in a timely manner. ASUS’s earnings are also impacted by the level of additional construction projects at the Military Utility Privatization Subsidiaries, which may or may not continue at current levels in future periods.
Water
For the year ended December 31, 2019,2020, revenues from water operations increased by $24.6$10.8 million to $319.8$330.6 million, compared to the year ended December 31, 2018. This increase was2019 as a result of new CPUC-approved water rates effectiveauthorized by the CPUC. Effective January 1, 20192020, GSWC received its full second-year step increase, as parta result of the May 2019 general rate case final decision. There were also revenue increasespassing an earnings test. This increase was partially offset by lower surcharges billed during 2020 related to CPUC-approved surcharges resulting from the May 2019 decision, as well asto recover previously incurred costs.These surcharges to cover increases in supply costs experienced in most ratemaking areas. The increase in surcharge revenues waswere largely offset by a corresponding increasedecreases in operating expenses, resulting in no impact to earnings.
Billed water consumption for the year ended December 31, 2019 decreased2020 increased approximately 6%5% as compared to 2018.2019. In general, changes in consumption do not have a significant impact on recorded revenues due to the CPUC-approved WRAM accounts in place in the majority of GSWC's rate-making areas. GSWC records the difference between what it bills its water customers and that which is currently authorized by the CPUC in the WRAM accounts as regulatory assets or liabilities. The August 2020 CPUC decision previously discussed eliminates the continued use of the WRAM beginning with the next general rate case application that will be filed in 2023 and will set new rates for the years 2025 - 2027.
Electric
For the year ended December 31, 2019,2020, revenues from electric operations were $39.5$37.0 million as compared to $34.4$39.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2018.2019. This increasedecrease was primarily due to new rates approvedthe retroactive revenue impact resulting from the final CPUC decision issued in the August 2019 CPUC final decision onin the electric general rate case, which were retroactive to January 1, 2018. Includedcase. The cumulative 2018 impact of the final decision was reflected in revenues2019's electric revenues. This decrease was partially offset by an increase in base rates effective for 2020 also authorized by the year ended December 31,CPUC's August 2019 was approximately $2.3 million which related to the full year of 2018.final decision.
Billed electric usage for the year ended December 31, 20192020 increased 3%4% as compared to the same period in 2018.2019. Due to the CPUC-approved base revenue requirement adjustment mechanism ("BRRAM"), which adjusts base revenues to adopted levels authorized by the CPUC, changes in usage do not have a significant impact on earnings.
Contracted Services
Revenues from contracted services are composed of construction revenues (including renewal and replacements) and management fees for operating and maintaining the water and/or wastewater systems at various military bases. For the year ended December 31, 2019,2020, revenues from contracted services were $114.5$120.6 million as compared to $107.2$114.5 million for 2018.2019. The increase was primarily due to an overall increase in construction activity, and an increase in management fees resulting from the commencementsuccessful resolution of operationsvarious economic price adjustments at Fort Rileythe military bases served. Offsetting these increases were retroactive revenues included in July 2018.2019's revenues resulting from the successful resolution of an economic price adjustment at one of the military bases served, which totaled approximately $500,000 and related to periods prior to 2019.There was no equivalent item during 2020.
ASUS's subsidiaries continue to enter into U.S. government-awarded contract modifications and agreements with third-party prime contractors for new construction projects at the military bases served. During 2019,2020, ASUS was awarded approximately $23$15.5 million in new construction projects for completion in 20192020 and 2020.2021. Earnings and cash flows from modifications to the original 50-year contracts with the U.S. government and agreements with third-party prime contractors for additional construction projects may or may not continue in future periods.
32
Operating Expenses:
Supply Costs
Supply costs for the water segment consist of purchased water, purchased power for pumping, groundwater production assessments and changes in the water supply cost balancing accounts. Supply costs for the electric segment consist primarily of purchased power for resale, the cost of natural gas used by BVES’sBVESI’s generating unit, the cost of renewable energy credits and changes in the electric supply cost balancing account. Water and electric gross margins are computed by subtracting total supply costs from total revenues. Registrant uses these gross margins and related percentages as an important measure in evaluating its operating results. Registrant believes these measures are useful internal benchmarks in evaluating the utility business performance within its water and electric segments. Registrant reviews these measurements regularly and compares them to historical periods and to its operating budget. However, these measures, which are not presented in accordance with GAAP, may not be comparable to similarly titled measures used by other enterprises and should not be considered as an alternative to operating income, which is determined in accordance with GAAP.
Total supply costs comprise the largest segment of total operating expenses. Supply costs accounted for 30.2%29.0% and 27.8%30.2% of total operating expenses for the years ended December 31, 20192020 and 2018,2019, respectively. The table below provides the amounts (in thousands) of increases (decreases) and percent changes in water and electric revenues, supply costs and gross margins during the years ended December 31, 20192020 and 2018.2019. There was a decrease of $585,000 in water surcharges, and an increase of $276,000 in electric surcharges of $1.4 million recorded in water revenues to recover previously incurred costs, which did not impact water earnings.costs. Surcharges to recover previously incurred costs are recorded to revenues when billed to customers and are offset by a corresponding amount in operating expenses, resulting in no impact to earnings. In addition, included in 2019 was approximately $2.3 million of retroactive electric revenues representing the fiscal 2018 increase in revenues approved by the CPUC in the August 2019 general electric rate case decision.
| Year Ended | Year Ended | $ | % | |||||||||||
| 12/31/2019 | 12/31/2018 | CHANGE | CHANGE | |||||||||||
WATER OPERATING REVENUES (1) | $ | 319,830 | $ | 295,258 | $ | 24,572 | 8.3 | % | ||||||
| WATER SUPPLY COSTS: | ||||||||||||||
Water purchased (1) | 72,289 | 68,904 | 3,385 | 4.9 | % | |||||||||
Power purchased for pumping (1) | 8,660 | 8,971 | (311 | ) | -3.5 | % | ||||||||
Groundwater production assessment (1) | 18,962 | 19,440 | (478 | ) | -2.5 | % | ||||||||
Water supply cost balancing accounts (1) | (8,153 | ) | (17,116 | ) | 8,963 | -52.4 | % | |||||||
| TOTAL WATER SUPPLY COSTS | $ | 91,758 | $ | 80,199 | $ | 11,559 | 14.4 | % | ||||||
WATER GROSS MARGIN (2) | $ | 228,072 | $ | 215,059 | $ | 13,013 | 6.1 | % | ||||||
ELECTRIC OPERATING REVENUES (1) | $ | 39,548 | $ | 34,350 | $ | 5,198 | 15.1 | % | ||||||
| ELECTRIC SUPPLY COSTS: | ||||||||||||||
Power purchased for resale (1) | 11,796 | 11,590 | 206 | 1.8 | % | |||||||||
Electric supply cost balancing accounts (1) | 1,127 | 1,467 | (340 | ) | -23.2 | % | ||||||||
| TOTAL ELECTRIC SUPPLY COSTS | $ | 12,923 | $ | 13,057 | $ | (134 | ) | -1.0 | % | |||||
ELECTRIC GROSS MARGIN (2) | $ | 26,625 | $ | 21,293 | $ | 5,332 | 25.0 | % | ||||||
| Year Ended | Year Ended | $ | % | ||||||||||||||||||||
| 12/31/2020 | 12/31/2019 | CHANGE | CHANGE | ||||||||||||||||||||
WATER OPERATING REVENUES (1) | $ | 330,637 | $ | 319,830 | $ | 10,807 | 3.4 | % | |||||||||||||||
| WATER SUPPLY COSTS: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Water purchased (1) | 74,554 | 72,289 | 2,265 | 3.1 | % | ||||||||||||||||||
Power purchased for pumping (1) | 10,134 | 8,660 | 1,474 | 17.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||||
Groundwater production assessment (1) | 20,392 | 18,962 | 1,430 | 7.5 | % | ||||||||||||||||||
Water supply cost balancing accounts (1) | (12,060) | (8,153) | (3,907) | 47.9 | % | ||||||||||||||||||
| TOTAL WATER SUPPLY COSTS | $ | 93,020 | $ | 91,758 | $ | 1,262 | 1.4 | % | |||||||||||||||
WATER GROSS MARGIN (2) | $ | 237,617 | $ | 228,072 | $ | 9,545 | 4.2 | % | |||||||||||||||
ELECTRIC OPERATING REVENUES (1) | $ | 37,024 | $ | 39,548 | $ | (2,524) | -6.4 | % | |||||||||||||||
| ELECTRIC SUPPLY COSTS: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Power purchased for resale (1) | 10,423 | 11,796 | (1,373) | -11.6 | % | ||||||||||||||||||
Electric supply cost balancing accounts (1) | 257 | 1,127 | (870) | -77.2 | % | ||||||||||||||||||
| TOTAL ELECTRIC SUPPLY COSTS | $ | 10,680 | $ | 12,923 | $ | (2,243) | -17.4 | % | |||||||||||||||
ELECTRIC GROSS MARGIN (2) | $ | 26,344 | $ | 26,625 | $ | (281) | -1.1 | % | |||||||||||||||
(1) As reported on AWR’s Consolidated Statements of Income, except for supply-cost-balancing accounts. The sums of water and electric supply-cost balancing accounts in the table above are shown on AWR’s Consolidated Statements of Income and totaled $(7,026,000)$(11,803,000) and $(15,649,000)$(7,026,000) for the years ended December 31, 20192020 and 2018,2019, respectively. Revenues include surcharges that have no net earnings impact because they increase both revenues and operating expenses by corresponding amounts.
(2) Water and electric gross margins do not include depreciation and amortization, maintenance, administrative and general, property and other taxes, and other operation expenses.
Two of the principal factors affecting water supply costs are the amount of water produced and the source of the water. Generally, the variable cost of producing water from wells is less than the cost of water purchased from wholesale suppliers. Under the CPUC-approved Modified Cost Balancing Account ("MCBA"), GSWC tracks adopted and actual expense levels for purchased water, power purchased for pumping and pump taxes. GSWC records the variances (which include the effects of changes in both rate and volume) between adopted and actual purchased water, purchased power and pump tax expenses. GSWC recovers from, or refunds to, customers the amount of such variances. GSWC tracks these variances individually for each water ratemaking area. The August 2020 CPUC decision previously discussed, which eliminates the continued use of the
33
WRAM, also eliminates the MCBA beginning with the next general rate case application that will be filed in 2023 and will set new rates for the years 2025 - 2027.
The overall actual percentages for purchased water for each of the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019 and 2018 werewas 44% and 41%, respectively, as compared to the adopted percentages of 34% and 36% for 2020 and 28% for 2019, and 2018, respectively. The higher actual percentages of purchased water as compared to adopted percentages resulted primarily from several wells being out of service. For 2020, the percentage of purchased water is expected to continue being higher than the adopted percentage. Purchased water costs for the year ended December 31, 20192020 increased to $72.3$74.6 million as compared to $68.9$72.3 million for the same period in 20182019 primarily due to the higher mix of purchased water as compared to pumped water and an increase in wholesale water costs, partially offset by lower customer usage.costs.
The cost of power purchased for pumping decreasedincreased to $8.7$10.1 million in 20192020 as compared to $9.0$8.7 million for the same period in 2018,2019, and groundwater production assessments decreasedincreased to $20.4 million in 2020 as compared to $19.0 million in 2019 as compared to $19.4 million in 2018.2019. The decreaseincreases in both of these areas waswere due in part, to a higher mix of purchased waterincreased rates and pump taxes as compared to pumped water resulting from several wells being out of service as previously discussed, as well as lower customer usage.
2019. The under-collection in the water supply cost balancing account decreased $9.0increased $3.9 million during the year ended December 31, 20192020 as compared to the same period in 20182019 due to updatedthe higher than adopted supply costs approved in the May 2019 general rate case decision, as well as CPUC-approved rate increases to cover increases in supply costs experienced in most ratemaking areas.costs.
For the year ended December 31, 2019,2020, the cost of power purchased for resale to BVES'sBVESI's customers was $11.8$10.4 million as compared to $11.6$11.8 million for the same period in 20182019 due to an increasea decrease in customer usage, partially offset by a lowerthe average price per megawatt-hour ("MWh"). The average price per MWh, including fixed costs, decreased to $75.47$67.52 per MWh in 20192020 from $79.90$75.47 per MWh for the year ended December 31, 2018.2019.
Other Operation
The primary components of other operation expenses for GSWC include payroll, materials and supplies, chemicals and water-treatment costs, and outside service costs of operating the regulated water and electric systems, including the costs associated with transmission and distribution, pumping, water quality, meter reading, billing, and operations of district offices. Registrant’s contracted services operations incur many of the same types of expenses. For the years ended December 31, 20192020 and 2018,2019, other operation expenses by business segment consisted of the following amounts (in thousands):
| Year Ended | Year Ended | $ | % | Year Ended | Year Ended | $ | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 12/31/2019 | 12/31/2018 | CHANGE | CHANGE | 12/31/2020 | 12/31/2019 | CHANGE | CHANGE | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Water Services | $ | 23,664 | $ | 22,525 | $ | 1,139 | 5.1 | % | Water Services | $ | 23,690 | $ | 23,664 | $ | 26 | 0.1 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Electric Services | 2,672 | 2,809 | (137 | ) | -4.9 | % | Electric Services | 2,705 | 2,672 | 33 | 1.2 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Contracted Services | 6,420 | 6,316 | 104 | 1.6 | % | Contracted Services | 6,841 | 6,420 | 421 | 6.6 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total other operation | $ | 32,756 | $ | 31,650 | $ | 1,106 | 3.5 | % | Total other operation | $ | 33,236 | $ | 32,756 | $ | 480 | 1.5 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||
For the year ended December 31, 2019,2020, there was an increasea $967,000 decrease in billed surcharges at the water segment related to the recovery of previously incurred other operation-related expenses of $653,000.expenses. This increasedecrease in billed surcharges has a corresponding increasedecrease in other operation expense, resulting in no impact to earnings. The remaining increase was mostlyExcluding this decrease, other operation costs increased by $993,000 due to higher labor costs.an increase in chemical and water treatment costs, and an increase in bad debt expense due to expected increases in delinquent customer payments as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic.However, bad debt expense in excess of what is included in GSWC's water revenue requirement has been included in the CPUC-approved catastrophic event memorandum account to be filed for future recovery.
For the year ended December 31, 2020, other operation expenses for contracted services increased primarily due to an increase in bad debt expense related to certain non-U.S. government receivable balances.
34
Administrative and General
Administrative and general expenses include payroll related to administrative and general functions, the related employeeall employee-related benefits, insurance expenses, outside legal and consulting fees, regulatory utility commission expenses, expenses associated with being a public company and general corporate expenses charged to expense accounts. For the years ended December 31, 20192020 and 2018,2019, administrative and general expenses by business segment, including AWR (parent), consisted of the following amounts (in thousands):
| Year Ended | Year Ended | $ | % | ||||||||||||||||||||
| 12/31/2020 | 12/31/2019 | CHANGE | CHANGE | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Water Services | $ | 55,067 | $ | 51,755 | $ | 3,312 | 6.4 | % | |||||||||||||||
| Electric Services | 8,639 | 8,150 | 489 | 6.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||||
| Contracted Services | 19,900 | 23,120 | (3,220) | -13.9 | % | ||||||||||||||||||
| AWR (parent) | 9 | 9 | — | — | % | ||||||||||||||||||
| Total administrative and general | $ | 83,615 | $ | 83,034 | $ | 581 | 0.7 | % | |||||||||||||||
| Year Ended | Year Ended | $ | % | |||||||||||
| 12/31/2019 | 12/31/2018 | CHANGE | CHANGE | |||||||||||
| Water Services | $ | 51,755 | $ | 54,212 | $ | (2,457 | ) | -4.5 | % | |||||
| Electric Services | 8,150 | 7,944 | 206 | 2.6 | % | |||||||||
| Contracted Services | 23,120 | 20,446 | 2,674 | 13.1 | % | |||||||||
| AWR (parent) | 9 | (7 | ) | 16 | * | |||||||||
| Total administrative and general | $ | 83,034 | $ | 82,595 | $ | 439 | 0.5 | % | ||||||
For the year ended December 31, 2019,2020, administrative and general expenses at the water segment decreasedincreased due, in part, to a $1.1 million reduction recorded in 2019 to reflect the CPUC's approval in the May 2019 final decision on the water general rate case for recovery of previously incurred costs that were being tracked in CPUC-authorized memorandum accounts. Excluding this item and surcharges, administrative and general expenses at the water segment increased by $2.2 million as a result of increases in labor costs and other employee-related benefits, insurance costs, and regulatory costs incurred in connection with the pending general rate case.
For the year ended December 31, 2020, administrative and general expenses at the electric segment include an increase of $145,000 in billed surcharges, with a corresponding and offsetting increase in administrative and general expenses. The remaining decreaseincrease was due primarily to lower regulatory-relatedhigher labor costs resulting from timing of the rate case cycle and when suchother employee-related benefits, and outside service costs are incurred. GSWC will file its next water general rate case in July 2020 and therefore, regulatory costs are expected to increase in 2020as compared to 2019.
For the year ended December 31, 2019,2020, administrative and general expenses for contracted services increaseddecreased by $2.7$3.2 million due to the commencement of operations at Fort Riley in July 2018, as well as an increase inlower (i) legal and labor-related costs.other outside services, (ii) labor costs and other employee-related benefit, and (iii) travel and related costs resulting from the impact of COVID-19, as compared to the same period in 2019.
Depreciation and Amortization
For the years ended December 31, 20192020 and 2018,2019, depreciation and amortization expense by segment consisted of the following amounts (in thousands):
| Year Ended | Year Ended | $ | % | |||||||||||
| 12/31/2019 | 12/31/2018 | CHANGE | CHANGE | |||||||||||
| Water Services | $ | 29,956 | $ | 36,137 | $ | (6,181 | ) | -17.1 | % | |||||
| Electric Services | 2,485 | 2,258 | 227 | 10.1 | % | |||||||||
| Contracted Services | 2,956 | 2,030 | 926 | 45.6 | % | |||||||||
| Total depreciation and amortization | $ | 35,397 | $ | 40,425 | $ | (5,028 | ) | -12.4 | % | |||||
| Year Ended | Year Ended | $ | % | ||||||||||||||||||||
| 12/31/2020 | 12/31/2019 | CHANGE | CHANGE | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Water Services | $ | 30,969 | $ | 29,956 | $ | 1,013 | 3.4 | % | |||||||||||||||
| Electric Services | 2,479 | 2,485 | (6) | -0.2 | % | ||||||||||||||||||
| Contracted Services | 3,402 | 2,956 | 446 | 15.1 | % | ||||||||||||||||||
| Total depreciation and amortization | $ | 36,850 | $ | 35,397 | $ | 1,453 | 4.1 | % | |||||||||||||||
The increases in depreciation expense atresulted mostly from additions to utility plant and other fixed assets. Included in 2019's depreciation expense for the electric and contracted services segments were duesegment was the impact of the August 2019 CPUC decision in the electric general rate case, which was retroactive to plant additions in 2018 and 2019.January 1, 2018.
35
Maintenance
For the years ended December 31, 20192020 and 2018,2019, maintenance expense by segment consisted of the following amounts (in thousands):
| Year Ended | Year Ended | $ | % | ||||||||||||||||||||
| 12/31/2020 | 12/31/2019 | CHANGE | CHANGE | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Water Services | $ | 11,737 | $ | 11,850 | $ | (113) | -1.0 | % | |||||||||||||||
| Electric Services | 985 | 993 | (8) | -0.8 | % | ||||||||||||||||||
| Contracted Services | 2,980 | 2,623 | 357 | 13.6 | % | ||||||||||||||||||
| Total maintenance | $ | 15,702 | $ | 15,466 | $ | 236 | 1.5 | % | |||||||||||||||
| Year Ended | Year Ended | $ | % | |||||||||||
| 12/31/2019 | 12/31/2018 | CHANGE | CHANGE | |||||||||||
| Water Services | $ | 11,850 | $ | 12,102 | $ | (252 | ) | -2.1 | % | |||||
| Electric Services | 993 | 1,002 | (9 | ) | -0.9 | % | ||||||||
| Contracted Services | 2,623 | 2,578 | 45 | 1.7 | % | |||||||||
| Total maintenance | $ | 15,466 | $ | 15,682 | $ | (216 | ) | -1.4 | % | |||||
Property and Other Taxes
For the years ended December 31, 20192020 and 2018,2019, property and other taxes by segment, consisted of the following amounts (in thousands):
| Year Ended | Year Ended | $ | % | Year Ended | Year Ended | $ | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 12/31/2019 | 12/31/2018 | CHANGE | CHANGE | 12/31/2020 | 12/31/2019 | CHANGE | CHANGE | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Water Services | $ | 17,034 | $ | 15,750 | $ | 1,284 | 8.2 | % | Water Services | $ | 18,261 | $ | 17,034 | $ | 1,227 | 7.2 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Electric Services | 1,134 | 1,059 | 75 | 7.1 | % | Electric Services | 1,232 | 1,134 | 98 | 8.6 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Contracted Services | 1,874 | 1,595 | 279 | 17.5 | % | Contracted Services | 2,706 | 1,874 | 832 | 44.4 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total property and other taxes | $ | 20,042 | $ | 18,404 | $ | 1,638 | 8.9 | % | Total property and other taxes | $ | 22,199 | $ | 20,042 | $ | 2,157 | 10.8 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||
Property and other taxes increased overall by $1.6$2.2 million during 20192020 as compared to 2018 primarily2019 due, toin large part, from an increase in property taxes resulting from capital additions and the associated higher assessed property values. IncreasesThere was also an increase in property taxes are reflectednon-income tax assessments and fees due to an increase in gross revenues at the new adopted water revenue requirement approved by the CPUC in the general rate case.contracted services segment.
ASUS Construction
For the year ended December 31, 2019,2020, construction expenses for contracted services were $55.7$62.4 million, increasing by $1.8$6.7 million compared to the same period in 20182019 due to an overall increase in construction activity, as compared to 2018 due, in part, to the commencement of operations at Fort Riley in July 2018.well as additional costs incurred on certain construction projects.
Interest Expense
For the years ended December 31, 20192020 and 2018,2019, interest expense by segment, including AWR (parent), consisted of the following amounts (in thousands):
| Year Ended | Year Ended | $ | % | ||||||||||||||||||||
| 12/31/2020 | 12/31/2019 | CHANGE | CHANGE | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Water Services | $ | 20,946 | $ | 21,966 | $ | (1,020) | -4.6 | % | |||||||||||||||
| Electric Services | 767 | 1,433 | (666) | -46.5 | % | ||||||||||||||||||
| Contracted Services | 478 | 587 | (109) | -18.6 | % | ||||||||||||||||||
| AWR (parent) | 340 | 600 | (260) | -43.3 | % | ||||||||||||||||||
| Total interest expense | $ | 22,531 | $ | 24,586 | $ | (2,055) | -8.4 | % | |||||||||||||||
| Year Ended | Year Ended | $ | % | |||||||||||
| 12/31/2019 | 12/31/2018 | CHANGE | CHANGE | |||||||||||
| Water Services | $ | 21,966 | $ | 21,212 | $ | 754 | 3.6 | % | ||||||
| Electric Services | 1,433 | 1,409 | 24 | 1.7 | % | |||||||||
| Contracted Services | 587 | 362 | 225 | 62.2 | % | |||||||||
| AWR (parent) | 600 | 450 | 150 | 33.3 | % | |||||||||
| Total interest expense | $ | 24,586 | $ | 23,433 | $ | 1,153 | 4.9 | % | ||||||
36
Interest Income
For the years ended December 31, 20192020 and 2018,2019, interest income by business segment, including AWR (parent), consisted of the following amounts (in thousands):
| Year Ended | Year Ended | $ | % | Year Ended | Year Ended | $ | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 12/31/2019 | 12/31/2018 | CHANGE | CHANGE | 12/31/2020 | 12/31/2019 | CHANGE | CHANGE | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Water Services | $ | 1,662 | $ | 2,809 | $ | (1,147 | ) | -40.8 | % | Water Services | $ | 634 | $ | 1,662 | $ | (1,028) | -61.9 | % | |||||||||||||||||||
| Electric Services | 205 | 81 | 124 | * | Electric Services | 183 | 205 | (22) | -10.7 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Contracted Services | 1,321 | 689 | 632 | * | Contracted Services | 974 | 1,321 | (347) | -26.3 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| AWR (parent) | 61 | (1 | ) | 62 | * | AWR (parent) | 10 | 61 | (51) | -83.6 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total interest income | $ | 3,249 | $ | 3,578 | $ | (329 | ) | -9.2 | % | Total interest income | $ | 1,801 | $ | 3,249 | $ | (1,448) | -44.6 | % | |||||||||||||||||||
For the year ended December 31, 2020, interest income decreased overall by $1.4 million as compared to 2019 due primarily to lower interest income earned on regulatory assets at the water segment bearing interest at the current 90-day commercial paper rate, which decreased compared to 2019, as well as lower regulatory asset balances resulting from the recovery of such balances through surcharges in place. There was also a decrease in interest income recognized on certain initial construction projects performed at the contracted services segment.
Other Income and (Expense), net
For the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019, other income and (expense) by business segment, including AWR (parent), consisted of the following amounts (in thousands):
| Year Ended | Year Ended | $ | % | ||||||||||||||||||||
| 12/31/2020 | 12/31/2019 | CHANGE | CHANGE | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Water Services | $ | 4,495 | $ | 3,257 | $ | 1,238 | 38.0 | % | |||||||||||||||
| Electric Services | 248 | 23 | 225 | * | |||||||||||||||||||
| Contracted Services | (138) | (238) | 100 | -42.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||||
| AWR (parent) | 248 | 234 | 14 | 6.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||||
| Total interest income | $ | 4,853 | $ | 3,276 | $ | 1,577 | 48.1 | % | |||||||||||||||
* not meaningful
For the year ended December 31, 2019, interest income decreased overall by $329,000 as compared to the same period in 2018 due primarily to interest income related to a federal tax refund recorded at the water segment in 2018, with no similar item in 2019. This was partially offset by interest income recognized in 2019 on certain initial construction projects performed at the contacted services segment, as well as interest related to regulatory assets for the electric segment as a result of the August 2019 CPUC final decision.
Income Tax Expense
For the years ended December 31, 20192020 and 2018,2019, income tax expense by segment, including AWR (parent), consisted of the following amounts (in thousands):
| Year Ended | Year Ended | $ | % | ||||||||||||||||||||
| 12/31/2020 | 12/31/2019 | CHANGE | CHANGE | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Water Services | $ | 20,515 | $ | 17,295 | $ | 3,220 | 18.6 | % | |||||||||||||||
| Electric Services | 2,689 | 2,882 | (193) | -6.7 | % | ||||||||||||||||||
| Contracted Services | 5,201 | 5,202 | (1) | — | % | ||||||||||||||||||
| AWR (parent) | (208) | (709) | 501 | -70.7 | % | ||||||||||||||||||
| Total income tax expense | $ | 28,197 | $ | 24,670 | $ | 3,527 | 14.3 | % | |||||||||||||||
| Year Ended | Year Ended | $ | % | |||||||||||
| 12/31/2019 | 12/31/2018 | CHANGE | CHANGE | |||||||||||
| Water Services | $ | 17,295 | $ | 12,391 | $ | 4,904 | 39.6 | % | ||||||
| Electric Services | 2,882 | 1,212 | 1,670 | 137.8 | % | |||||||||
| Contracted Services | 5,202 | 4,939 | 263 | 5.3 | % | |||||||||
| AWR (parent) | (709 | ) | (525 | ) | (184 | ) | 35.0 | % | ||||||
| Total income tax expense | $ | 24,670 | $ | 18,017 | $ | 6,653 | 36.9 | % | ||||||
Consolidated income tax expense for the year ended December 31, 20182020 increased by $6.7$3.5 million primarily due to an increase in pretax income at all segments. AWR's consolidatedand a higher overall effective income tax rate ("ETR"). AWR's consolidated effective ETR was 22.6%24.6% and 22.0%22.6% for the years ended December 31, 20192020 and 2018,2019, respectively. The increase was due primarily to the increase in GSWC's ETR, which was 23.2%25.0% for 20192020 as compared to 22.1%23.2% for 20182019 resulting primarily from net changes in certain flow-through and permanent and flow-through items, includingitems. The decrease in the amortization of the excess deferred income tax liability brought about by the lower federal corporate income tax rate beginning in 2018. Partially offsetting the overall increase in GSWC's ETR were lower state taxesbenefit at AWR (parent). was the result of changes in state unitary taxes.
37
Information comparing the consolidated results of operations for fiscal years 2019 and 2018 can be found under Item 7, Management’s Discussion and Analysis under the heading “Consolidated Results of Operations-Years Ended December 31, 2019 and 2018” in AWR's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2019 filed with the SEC.
38
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
Critical accounting policies and estimates are those that are important to the portrayal of AWR’s financial condition, results of operations and cash flows, and require the most difficult, subjective or complex judgments of AWR’s management. The need to make estimates about the effect of items that are uncertain is what makes these judgments difficult, subjective and/or complex. Management makes subjective judgments about the accounting and regulatory treatment of many items. The following are accounting policies that are critical to the financial statements of AWR. For more information regarding the significant accounting policies of Registrant, see Note 1 of “Notes to Financial Statements” included in Part II, Item 8, in Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.
Accounting for Rate Regulation — Because GSWC operatesand BVESI operate extensively in a regulated business, it isbusinesses, they are subject to the authoritative guidance for accounting for the effects of certain types of regulation. Application of this guidance requires accounting for certain transactions in accordance with regulations adopted by the regulatory commissions of the states in which rate-regulated operations are conducted. Utility companies defer costs and credits on the balance sheet as regulatory assets and liabilities when it is probable that those costs and credits will be recognized in the ratemaking process in a period different from the period in which they would have been reflected in income by an unregulated company. These deferred regulatory assets and liabilities are then reflected in the income statement in the period in which the same amounts are reflected in the rates charged for service.
Regulation and the effects of regulatory accounting have the most significant impact on the financial statements of GSWC.GSWC and BVESI. When GSWCeither files for adjustments to rates, the capital assets, operating costs and other matters are subject to review, and disallowances may occur. In the event that a portion of either GSWC’s or BVESI's operations isare no longer subject to the accounting guidance for the effects of certain types of regulation, GSWC isthey are required to write-off related regulatory assets that are not specifically recoverable and determine if other assets might be impaired. If the CPUC determines that a portion of either GSWC’s or BVESI's assets are not recoverable in customer rates, GSWCmanagement is required to determine if it has suffered an asset impairment that would require a write-down in the asset valuation. Management continually evaluates the anticipated recovery, settlement or refund of regulatory assets, liabilities, and revenues subject to refund and provides for allowances and/or reserves that it believes to be necessary. In the event that GSWC’smanagement’s assessment as to the probability of the inclusion in the ratemaking process is incorrect, the associated regulatory asset or liability will be adjusted to reflect the change in assessment or the impact of regulatory approval of rates. Reviews by the CPUC may also result in additional regulatory liabilities to refund previously collected revenues to customers if the CPUC were to disallow costs included in the ratemaking process.
Registrant also reviews its utility plant in-service for possible impairment in accordance with accounting guidance for regulated entities for abandonments and disallowances of plant costs.
Revenue Recognition — GSWC recordsand BVESI record water and electric utility operating revenues when the service is provided to customers. Operating revenues include unbilled revenues that are earned (i.e., the service has been provided) but not billed by the end of each accounting period. Unbilled revenues are calculated based on the number of days and total usage from each customer’s most recent billing record that was billed prior to the end of the accounting period and is used to estimate unbilled consumption as of the year-end reporting period. Unbilled revenues are recorded for both monthly and bi-monthly customers.
As required by the accounting guidance for alternative revenue programs, GSWC isand BVESI are required to collect itstheir WRAM and BRRAM balances, respectively, within 24 months following the year in which they are recorded. The CPUC has set the recovery period for under-collected balances that are up to 15% of adopted annual revenues at 18 months or less. For net WRAM under-collected balances greater than 15%, the recovery period is 19 to 36 months. As a result of the accounting guidance and CPUC-adopted recovery periods, Registrant must estimate if any WRAM and BRRAM revenues will be collected beyond the 24-month period, which can affect the timing of when such revenues are recognized.
39
ASUS's 50-year firm fixed-price contracts with the U.S. government are considered service concession arrangements under ASC 853 Service Concession Arrangements. Accordingly, the services under these contracts are accounted for under Topic 606 Revenue from Contracts with Customers and the water and/or wastewater systems are not recorded as Property, Plant and Equipment on Registrant’s balance sheet. Revenues for ASUS's operations and maintenance contracts are recognized when services have been rendered to the U.S. government pursuant to 50-year contracts. Revenues from construction activities are recognized based on either the percentage-of-completion or cost-plus methods of accounting. In accordance with GAAP, revenue recognition under these methods requires management to estimate the progress toward completion on a contract in terms of efforts, such as costs incurred. This approach is used because management considers it to be the best available measure of progress on these contracts. Changes in job performance, job conditions, change orders and estimated profitability, including those arising from any contract penalty provisions, and final contract settlements may result in revisions to costs and income, and are recognized in the period in which the revisions are determined. Unbilled receivables from the U.S.
government represent amounts to be billed for construction work completed and/or for services rendered pursuant to the 50-year contracts with the U.S government, which are not presently billable but which will be billed under the terms of the contracts.
Income Taxes — Registrant’s income tax calculations require estimates due principally to the regulated nature of the operations of GSWC and BVESI, the multiple states in which Registrant operates, and potential future tax rate changes. Registrant uses the asset and liability method of accounting for income taxes under which deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which these temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. Changes in regulatory treatment, or significant changes in tax-related estimates, assumptions or law, could have a material impact on the financial position and results of operations of Registrant.
As a regulated utility,utilities, GSWC treatsand BVESI treat certain temporary differences as flow-through adjustments in computing itstheir income tax expense consistent with the income tax approach approved by the CPUC for ratemaking purposes. Flow-through adjustments increase or decrease tax expense in one period, with an offsetting decrease or increase occurring in another period. Giving effect to these temporary differences as flow-through adjustments typically results in a greater variance between the effective tax rate and the statutory federal income tax rate in any given period than would otherwise exist if GSWC or BVESI were not required to account for its income taxes as a regulated enterprise.enterprises. As of December 31, 2019,2020, Registrant’s total amount of unrecognized tax benefits was zero.
Pension Benefits — Registrant’s pension benefit obligations and related costs are calculated using actuarial concepts within the framework of accounting guidance for employers' accounting for pensions and post-retirement benefits other than pensions. Two critical assumptions, the discount rate and the expected return on plan assets, are important elements of expense and/or liability measurement. We evaluate these critical assumptions annually. Other assumptions include employee demographic factors such as retirement patterns, mortality, turnover and rate of compensation increase. The discount rate enables Registrant to state expected future cash payments for benefits as a present value on the measurement date. The guideline for setting this rate is a high-quality, long-term corporate bond rate. Registrant’s discount rates were determined by considering the average of pension yield curves constructed using a large population of high-quality corporate bonds. The resulting discount rates reflect the matching of plan liability cash flows to the yield curves. A lower discount rate increases the present value of benefit obligations and increases periodic pension expense. Conversely, a higher discount rate decreases the present value of benefit obligations and decreases periodic pension expense. To determine the expected long-term rate of return on the plan assets, Registrant considers the current and expected asset allocation, as well as historical and expected returns on each plan asset class. A lower expected rate of return on plan assets will increase pension expense. The long-term expected return on the pension plan's assets was 6.50% in both 20196.25% for 2020 and 2018.6.5% for 2019.
For the pension plan obligation, Registrant decreased the discount rate to 2.55% as of December 31, 2020 from 3.43% as of December 31, 2019 from 4.43% as of December 31, 2018 to reflect market interest-rate conditions at December 31, 2019.2020. A hypothetical 25-basis point further decrease in the assumed discount rate would have increased total net periodic pension expense for 20192020 by approximately $761,000,$933,000, or 17.1%23.3%, and would have increased the projected benefit obligation (“PBO”) and accumulated benefit obligation (“ABO”) at December 31, 20192020 by a total of $8.8$10.9 million, or 3.8%4.0%. A 25-basis point further decrease in the long-term return on pension-plan-asset assumption would have increased 20192020 pension cost by approximately $399,000,$472,000, or 9.0%11.8%.
In addition, changes in the fair value of plan assets will impact future pension cost and the Plan’s funded status. Volatile market conditions can affect the value of plan assets held to fund its future long-term pension benefits. Any reductions in the value of plan assets will result in increased future expense, an increase in the underfunded position, and increasedincrease the required future contributions.
The CPUC has authorized GSWC and BVESI to each maintain a two-way balancing accountsaccount to track differences between thetheir forecasted annual pension expenses adopted in rates and the actual annual expense to be recorded by GSWC in accordance with the accounting guidance for pension costs. As of December 31, 2019,2020, GSWC has a $2.7$1.0 million over-collection in the two-wayits two-
40
way pension balancing accounts, consisting of a $1.5 million over-collection related toaccount for the general office and water regions, andregions. As of December 31, 2020, BVESI has a $1.2 million$206,000 over-collection related to BVES.in its two-way pension balancing account.
Funding requirements for qualified defined benefit pension plans are determined by government regulations. In establishing the contribution amount, Registrant has considered the potential impact of funding-rule changes under the Pension Protection Act of 2006. Registrant contributes the minimum required contribution as determined by government regulations or the forecasted annual pension cost authorized by the CPUC and included in customer rates, whichever is higher. In accordance with this funding policy, for 20202021 the pension contribution is expected to be approximately $3.3$3.6 million. Any differences between the forecasted annual pension costs in rates and the actual pension costs are included in the two-way pension balancing accounts. Additionally, market factors can affect assumptions we use in determining funding requirements with respect to our pension plan. For example, a relatively modest change in our assumptions regarding discount rates can materially affect our
calculation of funding requirements. To the extent that market data compels us to reduce the discount rate used in our assumptions, our benefit obligations could materially increase.
Changes in demographics, including increased numbers of retirees or increases in life expectancy assumptions may also increase the funding requirements of our obligations related to the pension and other postretirement benefit plans.plan. Mortality assumptions are a critical component of benefit obligation amounts and a key factor in determining the expected length of time for annuity payments. Assuming no changes in actuarial assumptions or plan amendments, the costs over the long term are expected to decrease due to the closure of Registrant’s defined benefit pension plan to new employees as of January 1, 2011. Employees hired or rehired after December 31, 2010 are eligible to participate in a defined contribution plan.
41
Liquidity and Capital Resources
AWR
Registrant’s regulated business is capital intensive and requires considerable capital resources. A portion of these capital resources is provided by internally generated cash flows from operations. AWR anticipates that interest expense will increase in future periods due to the need for additional external capital to fund its construction program and as market interest rates increase. In addition, as the capital investment program continues to increase, coupled with the elimination of bonus depreciation for regulated utilities due to tax reform enacted in 2017, AWR and its subsidiaries anticipate they will need to access external financing more often.AWR believes that costs associated with capital used to fund construction at GSWC and BVESI will continue to be recovered through water and electric rates charged to customers.
AWR funds its operating expenses and pays dividends on its outstanding Common Shares primarily through dividends from its wholly owned subsidiaries. The ability of GSWC and BVESI to pay dividends to AWR is restricted by California law. Under these restrictions, approximately $257.4$583.3 million was available for GSWC to pay dividends to AWR on December 31, 2019.2020. Approximately $62.1$62.8 million was available for ASUSBVESI to pay dividends to AWR as of December 31, 2019 to the extent that the subsidiaries of ASUS are able2020. ASUS's ability to pay dividends to AWR is dependent upon state laws in that amountwhich each Military Utility Privatization Subsidiary operates, as well as ASUS's ability to ASUSpay dividends under applicable state laws.California law.
When necessary, Registrant obtains funds from external sources in the capital markets and through bank borrowings.borrowings under revolving credit facilities. Access to external financing on reasonable terms depends on the credit ratings of AWR and GSWC and current business conditions, including that of the water utility industry in general, as well as conditions in the debt and equity capital markets.
AWR currently has access to a $200.0 million credit facility and borrows under a creditthis facility, which expires in May 2023, and providesto provide funds to its subsidiaries, GSWC and ASUS in support of their operations. The interest rate charged to GSWC and ASUS is sufficient to cover AWR’s interest expense under the credit facility. In MarchAs of December 31, 2020, there was $134.2 million outstanding under this facility. BVESI has a 3-year, $35.0 million revolving credit facility.As of December 31, 2020, there was $20.2 millionoutstanding under this facility.Borrowings made under this facility support BVESI's operations and capital expenditures.Under the terms of the credit agreement, BVESI has the option to request an increase in the facility by an additional $15.0 million.Furthermore, the CPUC issued a decision in December 2019 AWR amended this credit facilityapproving, among other things, BVESI's authority to increase its borrowing capacity from $150.0issue long-term financing not to exceed $75 million.
On May 7, 2020, the CPUC also approved GSWC’s finance application filed in November 2019 requesting authority to issue additional long-term debt and equity securities not to exceed $465 million to $200.0support its water operations.Following the CPUC's approval, on July 8, 2020, GSWC completed the issuance of unsecured private placement notes totaling $160.0 million. This financing consisted of GSWC issuing $85.0 million in 2.17% senior notes which mature in 2030, and $75.0 million in October 2019 further2.90% senior notes which mature in 2040.GSWC used the proceeds from the notes to pay down a majority of its intercompany borrowings from AWR.AWR used the proceeds from GSWC to pay down amounts outstanding under its credit facility. Previously, AWR had amended the credit facility to temporarily increase its borrowing capacity to $225.0 million, effective until June 30, 2020. In February 2020, AWR received a binding commitment from its lender for the option to revise the temporary increase of the credit facility to $260.0 million through the end of 2020. When needed, AWR will be able to exercise this commitment and have immediate access to the additional funds. On December 31, 2020, the borrowing capacity will revertup to $200.0 million. As$260 million in order to meet the operational needs of December 31, 2019, there was $205.0 million outstanding under this facility. Management intends to seek additional financing in 2020 throughGSWC and ASUS. Following the issuance of long-term debt at GSWC.GSWC’s notes and effective July 15, 2020, AWR reduced the aggregate borrowing capacity back down to $200 million pursuant to the terms of the revolving credit facility agreement.
As part of the response to the COVID-19 pandemic, GSWC intendsand BVESI have suspended, through June 30, 2021, service disconnections for non-payment pursuant to use the proceeds from any additional long-term debtCPUC orders.This is expected to reduce its intercompanyRegistrant's cash flows from operating activities and increase borrowings under AWR's and BVESI's credit facilities.The magnitude of the reduction to partially fund capital expenditures. AWR parent intendscash flows is difficult to usepredict at this time, and is dependent on variables such as the duration of any financing proceeds from GSWC to pay downstay-at-home orders issued by state and local governments and the amounts outstanding under its credit facility.associated impact such orders have on the economy, how successful such measures would be in containing the outbreak, and the nature and effectiveness of government assistance.
In December 2019,June 2020, Standard and Poor’s Global Ratings (“S&P”) affirmed an A+ credit rating with a stable outlook on both AWR and GSWC.S&P’s debt ratings range from AAA (highest possible) to D (obligation is in default). In May 2019,Also in June 2020, Moody's Investors Service ("Moody's") affirmedreaffirmed its A2 rating with a revisedstable outlook from positive to stable for GSWC.Securities ratings are not recommendations to buy, sell or hold a security, and are subject to change or withdrawal at any time by the rating agencies. Registrant believes that AWR’s sound capital structure and A+ credit rating, combined with its financial discipline, will enable AWRRegistrant to access the debt and equity markets. However, unpredictable financial market conditions in the future may limit its access or impact the timing of when to access the market, in which case Registrant may choose to temporarily reduce its capital spending.
42
AWR’s ability to pay cash dividends on its Common Shares outstanding depends primarily upon cash flows from its subsidiaries. AWR intends to continue paying quarterly cash dividends in the future, on or about March 1, June 1, September 1 and December 1, subject to earnings and financial conditions, regulatory requirements and such other factors as the Board of Directors may deem relevant. Registrant has paid dividends on its Common Shares for over 80 consecutive years. On January 28, 2020,February 2, 2021, AWR's Board of Directors approved a first quarter dividend of $0.305$0.335 per share on AWR's Common Shares. Dividends on the Common Shares will be paid on March 2, 20202021 to shareholders of record at the close of business on February 14, 2020. 16, 2021. AWR has paid dividends on its Common Shares for over 81 consecutive years, and has increased the dividends received by shareholders each calendar year for 66 consecutive years, which places it in an exclusive group of companies on the New York Stock Exchange that have achieved that result. Registrant's current policy is to achieve a compound annual growth rate in the dividend of more than 7% over the long-term.
Registrant's current liabilities may at times exceed its current assets. Management believes that internally generated cash flows from operations, borrowings from AWR's and BVESI's credit facilities, and access to long-term financing from capital markets will be adequate to provide sufficient capital to maintain normal operations and to meet its capital and financing requirements.
Cash Flows from Operating Activities:
Cash flows from operating activities have generally provided sufficient cash to fund operating requirements, including a portion of construction expenditures at GSWC and BVESI, and construction expenses at ASUS, and dividend payments.to pay dividends. Registrant’s future cash flows from operating activities are expected to be affected by a number of factors, including utility regulation; changes in tax law and deferred taxes;law; maintenance expenses; inflation; compliance with environmental, health and safety standards; production costs; customer growth; per-customer usage of water and electricity; weather and seasonality; conservation efforts; compliance with local governmental requirements, including mandatory restrictions on water use; the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on its customers' ability to pay utility bills and required cash contributions to pension and post-retirement plans. Future cash flows from contracted services subsidiaries will depend on new business activities, existing operations, the construction of new and/or replacement infrastructure at military bases, timely economic price and equitable adjustment of prices, and timely collection of payments from the U.S. government and other prime contractors operating at the military bases. bases and any adjustments arising out of an audit or investigation by federal governmental agencies.
ASUS funds its operating expenses primarily through internal operating sources, which include U.S. government funding under 50-year contracts for operations and maintenance costs and construction activities, as well as investments by, or loans from, AWR.ASUS, in turn, provides funding to its subsidiaries.ASUS's subsidiaries may also from time to time provide funding to ASUS or its subsidiaries.
Cash flows from operating activities are primarily generated by net income, adjusted for non-cash expenses such as depreciation and amortization. Cash generated by operations varies during the year. Net cash provided by operating activities was $122.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2020 as compared to $116.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2019 as compared to $136.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2018. There was a decrease2019. The increase in cash receiptswas due, in 2019 duepart, to lower water customer usage, delays in receiving decisions on the water and electric general rate cases and also the refunding of $7.2 million to water customers during the third quarter of 2019 related to the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act. The decreaseThere were no equivalent refunds made during the same period in 2020.There was also an increase in customer rates effective January 1, 2020 as well as higher water customer usage increases the under-collection balance induring 2020, which reduced the WRAM regulatory asset, which is filed annuallyunder-collection as compared to 2019.These increases were partially offset by a decrease in cash flows from accounts receivable from utility customers due to the economic impact of the COVID-19 pandemic, and the CPUC-mandated suspension of service disconnections to customers for recovery. Thesenon-payment.There were also decreases in cash flows were partially offset by an increase in cash resulting from the timing in billing of and cash receipts for construction work at military bases during 2019.the year ended December 31, 2020. The billings (and cash receipts) for construction work at our contracted services segment generally occur at completion of the work or in accordance with a billing schedule contractually agreed to with the U.S. government and/or other prime contractors. Thus, cash flow from construction-related activities may fluctuate from period to period with such fluctuations representing timing differences of when the work is being performed and when the cash is received for payment of the work.The timing of cash receipts and disbursements related to other working capital items also affected the change in net cash provided by operating activities.
43
Cash Flows from Investing Activities:
Net cash used in investing activities was $153.2$131.6 million for the year ended December 31, 20192020 as compared to $128.0$153.2 million used in 2018. The increase2019 largely due to a decrease in cash used in investing activities during 2019 was due tocapital expenditures at GSWC, partially offset by an increase in capital expenditures at BVESI. GSWC's capital expenditures activity has been negatively affected by the COVID-19 pandemic, including among other things, local mandated restrictions on shutting off service as comparedpart of the response to 2018. Cash used for other investments consists primarily of cash investedthe pandemic.These restrictions have impacted pipeline replacement projects, which require temporary service shut-offs in a trust for a retirement benefit plan.
order to complete them.There has also been delays in obtaining permits from local cities and governments.Registrant invests capital to provide essential services to its regulated customer base, and has anwhile working with its regulators to have the opportunity to earn a fair rate of return on investments in infrastructure. investment.Registrant’s infrastructure investment plan consists of both infrastructure renewal programs where(where infrastructure is replaced, as needed,needed) and major capital investment projects where(where new water treatment, supply and delivery facilities are constructed.constructed). GSWC may also be required from time to time to relocate existing infrastructure in order to accommodate local infrastructure improvement projects. Projected capital expenditures and other investments are subject to periodic review and revision. During 2021, the regulated utilities' company-funded capital expenditures are expected to be between $120 and $135 million. Cash used for other investments consists primarily of cash invested in a trust for a retirement benefit plan.
Cash Flows from Financing Activities:
Registrant’s financing activities include primarily: (i) the sale proceeds from the issuance of Common Shares and stock option exercises and the repurchase of Common Shares; (ii) the issuance and repayment of long-term debt and notes payable to banks; and (iii) the payment of dividends on Common Shares. In order to finance new infrastructure, RegistrantGSWC also receives customer advances (net of refunds) for, and contributions in aid of, construction. Short-term borrowingsBorrowings on AWR's and BVESI's credit facilities are used to fund GSWC and BVESI capital expenditures, respectively, until long-term financing is arranged. Overall debt levels are expected to increase to fund a portion of the costs of the capital expenditures that will be made by Registrant.
Net cash provided by financing activities was $30.5$44.8 million for the year ended December 31, 20192020 as compared to net cash used of $1.8$30.5 million provided for the same period in 2018.2019. The increase in cash provided by financing activities in 2020 was due to the issuance by GSWC of new unsecured private placement notes totaling $160.0 million. There were also net borrowings on BVESI's credit facility, which was established in July of 2020. These increases in cash were partially offset by the pay down in borrowings on AWR's credit facility using the proceeds from GSWC's $160.0 million debt issuance. A portion of the net borrowings from AWR's credit facility during 2019 was due largelyused to increased borrowings on Registrant's credit facility to partially fund capital expenditures, as well as repay $40the repayment of $40.0 million senior notes, which matured in GSWC debt, which became due inMarch 2019.
GSWC
GSWC funds its operating expenses, payments on its debt, dividends on its outstanding common shares, and a portion of its construction expenditures through internal sources.Internal sources of cash flow are provided primarily by retention of a portion of earnings from operating activities.Internal cash generation is influenced by factors such as weather patterns, conservation efforts, environmental regulation, litigation, changes in tax law and deferred taxes, changes in supply costs and regulatory decisions affecting GSWC’s ability to recover these supply costs, timing of rate relief, increases in maintenance expenses and capital expenditures, surcharges authorized by the CPUC to enable GSWC to recover expenses previously incurred from customers, and CPUC requirements to refund amounts previously charged to customers.Internal cash flows may also be impacted from delays in receiving payments from GSWC customers due to the economic impact of the COVID-19 pandemic and state legislation suspending customer disconnections for non-payment.
GSWC may, at times, utilize external sources includingfor long-term financing, as well as obtain funds from equity investments and intercompany borrowings from AWR and long-term debt to help fund a portion of its operations and construction expenditures. On July 8, 2020, GSWC completed the issuance of unsecured private placement notes totaling $160.0 million.Furthermore, AWR borrows under a revolving credit facility, which expires in May 2023, and provides funds to GSWC in support of its operations under intercompany borrowing arrangements.
In addition, GSWC receives advances and contributions from customers, homebuilders and real estate developers to fund construction necessary to extend service to new areas. Advances for construction are generally refundable at a rate of 2.5% in equal annual installments over 40 years. Amounts that are no longer subject to refund are reclassified to contributions in aid of construction. Utility plant funded by advances and contributions is excluded from rate base. Generally, GSWC amortizes contributions in aid of construction at the same composite rate of depreciation for the related property.
As is often the case with public utilities, GSWC’s current liabilities may at times exceed its current assets. Management believes that internally generated funds, along with the proceeds from the issuance of long-term debt, borrowings from AWR and common share issuances to AWR, will be adequate to provide sufficient capital to enable GSWC to maintain normal operations and to meet its capital and financing requirements pending recovery of costs in rates.
44
The CPUC requires GSWC to completely pay down all intercompany borrowings from AWR within a 24-month period. The end of the next 24-month period in which GSWC iswas required to completely pay down its intercompany borrowings will bewas in November 2020. AsOn October 27, 2020, the Board of Directors approved the issuance of five additional GSWC common shares to AWR for $60.0 million. The five GSWC shares were issued to AWR during the fourth quarter of 2020. GSWC used a result, GSWC’s intercompany borrowingsportion of $158.8 million as of December 31, 2019 have been classified as a current liability on GSWC’s balance sheet. GSWC intends to use the proceeds from any new long-term debtthe issuance to reduce itspay down intercompany borrowings andowed to partially fund capital expenditures.AWR. AWR parent intends to use any financingused these proceeds from GSWC to pay down the amounts outstanding under its credit facility.
On July 1, 2020, GSWC completed the transfer of the net assets from its electric utility division to BVESI. As a result of this transfer, from July 1, 2020 onward, the cash flows of the electric segment are no longer included in GSWC's statement of cash flows, but continue to be included in AWR's consolidated statement of cash flows.
Cash Flows from Operating Activities:
Net cash provided by operating activities was $96.6$110.3 million for the year ended December 31, 20192020 as compared to $120.4$96.6 million for the same period in 2018.2019. The decreaseincrease in cash receipts in 2019 as compared to 2018 was due, to lower water customer usage, delays in receiving decisions on the water and electric general rate cases and alsopart, to the refunding of $7.2 million to water customers during the third quarter of 2019 related to the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act. The decreaseThere were no equivalent refunds made during 2020.There was also an increase in customer water rates effective January 1, 2020 as well as higher water customer usage increases the under-collection balance induring 2020, which reduced the WRAM regulatory asset, which is filed annuallyunder-collection as compared to 2019.These increase were partially offset by a decrease in cash flows from accounts receivable from utility customers due to the economic impact of the COVID-19 pandemic, and the CPUC-mandated suspension of customer service disconnections for recovery. nonpayment.The timing of cash receipts and disbursements related to other working capital items also affected the change in net cash provided by operating activities.
Cash Flows from Investing Activities:
Net cash used in investing activities was $144.2$117.7 million for the year ended December 31, 20192020 as compared to $117.9$144.2 million for the same period in 2018. The increase in cash used in investing activities during 2019 was due to an increase in capital expenditures as compared to 2018.
2019. During the years ended December 31, 20192020 and 2018,2019, cash paid for capital expenditures was $116.4 million and $142.9 million, and $116.4 million, respectively. Capital expenditures incurred in 2019 and 2018 were consistent with GSWC’s capital investment program. GSWC expectsDue to the electric utility reorganization effective July 1, 2020, company-fundedGSWC's cash flows from investing activities during 2020 include six months of electric utility capital expenditures, as compared to be between $120twelve months of capital expenditures in 2019. In addition, capital expenditures activity at GSWC has been negatively affected by the COVID-19 pandemic, including among other things, local mandated restrictions on shutting off service as part of the response to the pandemic, as well as delays in obtaining permits from local cities and $135 million.governments.These restrictions have impacted pipeline replacement projects, which require temporary service shut-offs in order to complete them.
In October 2020, AWR issued an interest bearing promissory note to GSWC, which expires in May 2023. Under the terms of this note, AWR may borrow from GSWC amounts up to $30 million for working capital purposes. AWR agrees to pay any unpaid principal amounts outstanding under this note, plus accrued interest. In November 2020, AWR borrowed $6 million from GSWC under the terms of the note, which was subsequently repaid in December 2020. As of December 31, 2020, there were no amounts outstanding under this note.
Cash Flows from Financing Activities:
Net cash provided by financing activities was $42.5 million for 2020 as compared to $43.8 million for 2019 as compared to net cash used of $1.4 million for 2018.2019. The increase in net cash provided by financing activities during 2019decrease was largely due to an increase in intercompany borrowingsdividends paid to AWR parent in 2020 as compared to 2018.2019. These proceedsdividends as well as the pay down of intercompany borrowings from AWR were largely funded through the issuance by GSWC of unsecured private placement notes totaling $160.0 million, as well as the issuance of five additional GSWC common shares to AWR for $60.0 million. In 2019, there were net intercompany borrowings from AWR used to partially fund capital expenditures and to repay $40.0 million of GSWC debt, which matured in 2019. There was also a decrease in dividends paid by GSWC to AWR parent in 2019 as compared to 2018.
45
Contractual Obligations, Commitments and Off-Balance-Sheet Arrangements
Registrant has various contractual obligations, which are recorded as liabilities in the consolidated financial statements. Other items, such as certain purchase commitments, and operating leases, are not recognized as liabilities in the consolidated financial statements but are required to be disclosed. In addition to contractual maturities, Registrant has certain debt instruments that contain annual sinking funds or other principal payments. Registrant believes that it will be able to refinance debt instruments at their maturity through public issuance or private placement of debt or equity. Annual payments to service debt are generally made from cash flows from operations.
The following table reflects Registrant’s contractual obligations and commitments to make future payments pursuant to contracts as of December 31, 2019.2020. The table reflects only financial obligations and commitments. Therefore, performance obligations associated with our 50-year firm, fixed-price contracts with the U.S. government at our contracted services segment are not included in the amounts below. All obligations and commitments are obligations and commitments of GSWC unless otherwise noted.
| Payments/Commitments Due by Period (1) | ||||||||||||||||||||
| ($ in thousands) | Total | Less than 1 Year | 1-3 Years | 4-5 Years | After 5 Years | |||||||||||||||
| Notes/Debentures (2) | $ | 187,000 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 187,000 | ||||||||||
| Private Placement Notes (3) | 83,000 | — | — | — | 83,000 | |||||||||||||||
| Tax-Exempt Obligations (4) | 11,293 | 156 | 348 | 378 | 10,411 | |||||||||||||||
| Other Debt Instruments (5) | 3,406 | 188 | 409 | 453 | 2,356 | |||||||||||||||
| Total AWR Long-Term Debt | $ | 284,699 | $ | 344 | 757 | $ | 831 | $ | 282,767 | |||||||||||
| Interest on Long-Term Debt (6) | $ | 234,813 | $ | 18,890 | $ | 37,721 | $ | 37,648 | $ | 140,554 | ||||||||||
| Advances for Construction (7) | 67,350 | 3,361 | 6,708 | 6,660 | 50,621 | |||||||||||||||
| Renewable Energy Credit Agreement (8) | 2,323 | 465 | 1,858 | — | — | |||||||||||||||
| Purchased Power Contracts (9) | 26,347 | 6,224 | 11,157 | 8,966 | — | |||||||||||||||
| Capital Expenditures (10) | 50,878 | 50,878 | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||
| Water Purchase Agreements (11) | 4,116 | 417 | 834 | 834 | 2,031 | |||||||||||||||
| Operating Leases (12) | 15,983 | 2,709 | 4,750 | 3,278 | 5,246 | |||||||||||||||
| Employer Contributions (13) | 6,469 | 3,326 | 3,143 | — | — | |||||||||||||||
| SUB-TOTAL | $ | 408,279 | $ | 86,270 | $ | 66,171 | $ | 57,386 | $ | 198,452 | ||||||||||
| Other Commitments (14) | 214,802 | |||||||||||||||||||
| TOTAL | $ | 907,780 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Payments/Commitments Due by Period (1) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ($ in thousands) | Total | Less than 1 Year | 1-3 Years | 4-5 Years | After 5 Years | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Notes/Debentures (2) | $ | 187,000 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 187,000 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Private Placement Notes (3) | 243,000 | — | — | — | 243,000 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Tax-Exempt Obligations (4) | 11,052 | 159 | 357 | 405 | 10,131 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Other Debt Instruments (5) | 3,219 | 199 | 431 | 474 | 2,115 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total AWR Long-Term Debt | $ | 444,271 | $ | 358 | 788 | $ | 879 | $ | 442,246 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Interest on Long-Term Debt (6) | $ | 276,106 | $ | 22,898 | $ | 45,752 | $ | 45,683 | $ | 161,773 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Advances for Construction (7) | 66,777 | 3,423 | 6,825 | 6,693 | 49,836 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Renewable Energy Credit Agreement (8) | 1,858 | 620 | 1,238 | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Purchased Power Contracts (9) | 20,123 | 5,644 | 10,419 | 4,060 | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Capital Expenditures (10) | 12,317 | 12,317 | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Water Purchase Agreements (11) | 3,762 | 426 | 852 | 809 | 1,675 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Operating Leases (12) | 13,456 | 2,561 | 4,143 | 2,827 | 3,925 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Employer Contributions (13) | 27,826 | 3,626 | 14,840 | 9,360 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| SUB-TOTAL | $ | 422,225 | $ | 51,515 | $ | 84,069 | $ | 69,432 | $ | 217,209 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Other Commitments (14) | 144,109 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| TOTAL | $ | 1,010,605 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(1) Excludes dividends and facility fees.
(2) The notes and debentures have been issued by GSWC under an Indenture dated September 1, 1993, as amended in December 2008. The notes and debentures do not contain any financial covenants that Registrant believes to be material or any cross-default provisions.
(3) GSWC issued private placement notes in 1991 in the amount of $28$28.0 million pursuant to the terms of note purchase agreements with substantially similar terms. These agreements contain restrictions on the payment of dividends, minimum interest coverage requirements, a maximum debt-to-capitalization ratio, and a negative pledge. Pursuant to the terms of these agreements, GSWC must maintain a minimum interest coverage ratio of two times interest expense. In addition, a senior note in the amount of $40private placement notes totaling $215.0 million was issued by GSWC in October 2005 to CoBank, ACB. A senior note in the amount of $15 million washave been issued to The Prudential Insurance Companyvarious banks, including $160.0 million of Americaunsecured private placement notes issued in December 2014.July 2020. Under the terms of each of these senior notes, GSWC may not incur any additional debt or pay any distributions to its shareholders if, after giving effect thereto, it would have a debt to capitalization ratio in excess of 0.6667-to-1 or a debt to earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization ratio of more than 8-to-1. GSWC is in compliance with theseall of its covenant provisions as of December 31, 2019.2020. GSWC does not currently have any outstanding mortgages or other liens on indebtedness on its properties.
(4) Consists of obligations at GSWC related to (i) a loan agreement supporting $7.7 million in outstanding debt issued by the California Pollution Control Financing Authority, and (ii) $3.6$3.3 million of obligations with respect to GSWC's 500 acre-foot entitlement to water from the State Water Project (“SWP”). These obligations do not contain any financial covenants
believed to be material to Registrant or any cross-default provisions. In regard to its SWP entitlement, GSWC has entered into agreements with various developers for a portion of its 500 acre-foot entitlement to water from the SWP.
46
(5) Consists of the outstanding debt portion of funds received under the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act for reimbursements of capital costs related to the installation of meters for conversion of non-metered service to metered service in GSWC's Arden-Cordova District.
(6) Consists of expected interest expense payments based on the assumption that GSWC’s long-term debt remains outstanding until maturity.
(7) Advances for construction represent contract refunds bymostly from GSWC to developers for the cost of water systems paid for by the developers. The advances are generally refundable in equal annual installments over 40-year periods.
(8) Consists of an agreement by GSWCBVESI to purchase renewable energy credits through 2023. These renewable energy credits are used by GSWC's electric division to meet California's renewables portfolio standard.
(9) Consists of BVESBVESI fixed-cost purchased power contracts executed in September 2019 with Exelon Generation Company, LLC and Morgan Stanley Capital Group Inc.
(10) Consists primarily of capital expenditures estimated to be required under signed contracts at GSWC and BVESI as of December 31, 2019.2020.
(11) Water purchase agreements consist of (i) a remaining amount of $2.1$1.9 million under an agreement expiring in 2028 to use water rights from a third party, and (ii) an aggregate amount of $2.0$1.9 million of other water purchase commitments with other third parties, which expire between 2025 through 2038.
(12) Reflects future minimum payments under noncancelable operating leases for both GSWC and ASUS.
(13) Consists of expected contributions to Registrant's defined benefit pension plan for the years 20202021 through 2021. Contribution2024. Contributions to the pension plan are expected to be the higher of the minimum required contributioncontributions under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (“ERISA”) or the amounts that are recovered in customer rates and approved by the CPUC. These amounts are estimates and are subject to change based on, among other things, the limits established for federal tax deductibility (pension plan) and the significant impact that returns on plan assets and changes in discount rates have on such amounts.
(14) Other commitments consist primarily of (i) a $225$200 million revolving credit facility under AWR, of which $205.0$134.2 million was outstanding as of December 31, 2019;2020; (ii) a $8.9$35.0 million revolving credit facility under BVESI, of which $20.2 million was outstanding as of December 31, 2020; (iii) a $9.3 million asset retirement obligationobligations of GSWC that reflectsreflect the retirement of wells by GSWC, which by law need to be properly capped at the time of removal; (iii) an(iv) irrevocable letterletters of credit in the amount of $340,000$440,000 for the deductible in Registrant’s business automobile insurance policy; (iv) an irrevocable letter of credit issued on behalf of GSWC in the amount of $585,000 as security for the purchase of power by BVES under an energy scheduling agreement with Automated Power Exchange;policies; and (v) a $15,000 irrevocable letter of credit issued on behalf of GSWC pursuant to a franchise agreement with the City of Rancho Cordova. In February 2020, AWR received a binding commitment from its lender for the option to temporarily increase the revolving credit facility to $260.0 million through the end of 2020. When needed, AWR will be able to exercise this commitment and have immediate access to the additional funds. On December 31, 2020, the borrowing capacity will revert to $200.0 million. All of the letters of credit are issued pursuant to theAWR's revolving credit facility. The revolving credit facility contains restrictions on prepayments, disposition of property, mergers, liens and negative pledges, indebtedness and guaranty obligations, transactions with affiliates, minimum interest coverage requirements, a maximum debt-to-capitalization ratio, and a minimum debt rating. Pursuant to the credit agreement, AWR must maintain a minimum interest coverage ratio of 3.25 times interest expense, a maximum total funded debt ratio of 0.65-to-1.00 and a minimum debt rating from Moody’s or S&P of Baa3 or BBB-, respectively. As of December 31, 2019, AWR was in compliance with these covenants with an interest coverage ratio of 6.89 times interest expense, a debt ratio of 0.45-to-1.00 and debt ratings of A+ and A2.
Off-Balance-Sheet Arrangements
Registrant has various contractual obligations that are recorded as liabilities in the consolidated financial statements. Other items, such as certain purchase commitments, are not recognized as liabilities in the consolidated financial statements but are required to be disclosed. Except for those disclosed above in the table, Registrant does not have any other off-balance-sheet arrangements.
47
Effects of Inflation
The rates of GSWC and BVESI are established to provide recovery of costs and a fair return on shareholders’ investment. Recovery of the effects of inflation through higher water and electric rates is dependent upon receiving adequate and timely rate increases; however, authorized rates charged to customers are usually based on a forecast of expenses and capital costs for GSWC.costs. Rates may lag increases in costs caused by unanticipated inflation. During periods of moderate to low inflation, as has been experienced for the last several years, the effects of inflation on operating results have not been significant. Furthermore, the CPUC approves projections for a future test year in general rate cases which reduces the impact of inflation to the extent that GSWC’s or BVESI's inflation forecasts are accurate.
For the Military Utility Privatization Subsidiaries, under the terms of the 50-year contracts with the U.S. government, the contract price is subject to an economic price adjustment on an annual basis. ASUS has experienced delays in some of its economic price adjustments. However, when adjustments are finalized, they are implemented retroactively to the effective date of the economic price adjustment.
Climate Change
Water - GSWC considers the potential impacts of climate change in its water supply portfolio planning and its overall infrastructure replacement plans. In addition, GSWC considers the impacts of greenhouse gas emissions and other environmental concerns in its operations and infrastructure investments.
Electric - California has established a cap-and-trade program applicable to greenhouse gas emissions. While BVES’sBVESI’s power-plant emissions are below the reporting threshold, as a “Covered Entity” BVESBVESI has an obligation to file a report in June of each year under the Greenhouse Gas Mandatory Reporting Regulation.
The State of California and the CPUC have also established renewable energy procurement targets. BVESBVESI has entered into a CPUC-approved ten-year contract for renewable energy credits. Because of this agreement, BVESBVESI believes it will comply through at least 2023 with California’s renewable energy statutes that address this issue.
Construction Program
GSWC maintains an ongoing water distribution main replacement program throughout its customer service areas based on the age and type of distribution-system materials, priority of leaks detected, remaining productive life of the distribution system and an underlying replacement schedule. In addition, GSWC upgrades its electric and water supplyBVESI upgrade their facilities in accordance with industry standards, local and CPUC requirements, and new legislation. In September 2018, the California legislature enacted Senate Bill (SB) 901 mandating investor-owned electric utilities to submit an annual wildfire mitigation plan to the CPUC for approval. SB 901 requires all electric utilities to prepare plans on constructing, maintaining, and operating their electrical lines and equipment to minimize the risk of catastrophic wildfire.wildfires.
As of December 31, 2019,2020, GSWC hasand BVESI have unconditional purchase obligations for capital projects of approximately $50.9$12.3 million. During the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018, GSWC and 2017, GSWCBVESI had capital expenditures of $130.4 million, $140.8 million $125.1 million and $115.3$125.1 million, respectively. A portion of these capital expenditures was funded by developers through contributions in aid of construction, which are not required to be repaid, and refundable advances. During the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019 2018 and 2017,2018, capital expenditures funded by developers were $7.0 million, $4.7 million $4.1 million and $3.5$4.1 million, respectively. During 2020, GSWC's2021, the water and electric segments' company-funded capital expenditures are estimated to be approximately $120 - $135 million.million, including approximately $12.2 million estimated to be spent by BVESI on wildfire mitigation projects.
48
Contracted Services
Under the terms of the current and future utility privatization contracts with the U.S. government, each contract's price is subject to an economic price adjustment (“EPA”) on an annual basis. In the event that ASUS (i) is managing more assets at specific military bases than were included in the U.S. government’s request for proposal, (ii) is managing assets that are in substandard condition as compared to what was disclosed in the request for proposal, (iii) prudently incurs costs not contemplated under the terms of the utility privatization contract, and/or (iv) becomes subject to new regulatory requirements, such as more stringent water-quality standards, ASUS is permitted to file, and has filed, requests for equitable adjustment (“REA”REAs”). The timely filing for and receipt of EPAs and/or REAs continues to be critical in order for the Military Utility Privatization Subsidiaries to recover increasing costs of operating, maintaining, renewing, and replacing the water and/or wastewater systems at the military bases it serves.
Under the Budget Control Act of 2011 (the “2011 Act”), substantial automatic spending cuts, known as "sequestration," have impacted the expected levels of Department of Defense budgeting. The Military Utility Privatization Subsidiaries have not experienced any earnings impact to their existing operations and maintenance and renewal and replacement services, as utility privatization contracts are an "excepted service" within the 2011 Act. While the ongoing effects of sequestration have been mitigated through the passage of the Bipartisan Budget Act of 20182019 for fiscal years 20182020 and 2019, similar issues may arise as part of fiscal uncertainty and/or future debt-ceiling limits imposed by Congress. However, any future impact on ASUS and its operations through the Military Utility Privatization Subsidiaries will likely be limited to (a) the timing of funding to pay for services rendered, (b) delays in the processing of EPAs and/or REAs, (c) the timing of the issuance of contract modifications for new construction work not already funded by the U.S. government, and/or (d) delays in the solicitation for and/or awarding of new contracts under the Department of Defense utility privatization program. Furthermore, from December 22, 2018 until January 25, 2019, the U.S. government shutdown impacted non-essential government employees due to the lack of an approved appropriations bill to fund the operations of the federal government for fiscal year 2019. However, the shutdown did not have any meaningful impact on ASUS due to the fact that funding for military operations (including military bases) is provided by the Department of Defense, which is fully funded for fiscal year 2019 and was not part of the government shutdown. There were no further shutdowns during the remainder of 2019 and the start of 2020 as two continuing resolutions and a spending package were passed allowing the federal government funding to continue for 2020.
At times, the DCAA and/or the DCMA may, at the request of a contracting officer, perform audits/reviews of contractors for compliance with certain government guidance and regulations, such as the Federal Acquisition Regulations and Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplements. Certain audit/review findings, such as system deficiencies for government-contract-business-system requirements, may result in delays in the resolution of filings submitted to and/or the ability to file new proposals with the U.S. government.
Below is a summary of current and projected EPA filings for price adjustments to operations and maintenance fees and renewal and replacement fees for the Military Utility Privatization Subsidiaries in fiscal 2020.
2021.
| Military Base | EPA period | Filing Date | ||||||||||||
| Fort Bliss (FBWS) | October | Third Quarter | ||||||||||||
| Joint Base Andrews | February | Fourth Quarter | ||||||||||||
| Fort Lee (ODUS) | February | Fourth Quarter | ||||||||||||
| Joint Base Langley Eustis and Joint Expeditionary Base Little Creek Fort Story (ODUS) | April | First Quarter of | ||||||||||||
| Fort Jackson (PSUS) | February | Fourth Quarter | ||||||||||||
| Fort Bragg (ONUS) | March | First Quarter | ||||||||||||
| Eglin Air Force Base (ECUS) | June | Second Quarter | ||||||||||||
| Fort Riley (FRUS) | July | Second Quarter | ||||||||||||
49
Regulatory Matters
Certificates of Public Convenience and Necessity
GSWC holdsand BVESI hold Certificates of Public Convenience and Necessity (“CPCN”) granted by the CPUC in each of the ratemaking areas it serves.they serve. ASUS is regulated, if applicable, by the state in which it primarily conducts water and/or wastewater operations. FBWS holds a CPCN from the Public Utilities Commission of Texas. The Virginia State Corporation Commission exercises jurisdiction over ODUS as a public service company. The Maryland Public Service Commission approved the right of TUS to operate as a water and wastewater utility at Joint Base Andrews, Maryland, based on certain conditions. The South Carolina Public Service Commission exercises jurisdiction over PSUS as a public service company. ONUS is regulated by the North Carolina Public Service Commission. ECUS and FRUS are not subject to regulation by their respective states' utility commissions.
Rate Regulation
GSWC isand BVESI are subject to regulation by the CPUC which has broad authority over service and facilities, rates, classification of accounts, valuation of properties, the purchase, disposition and mortgaging of properties necessary or useful in rendering public utility service, the issuance of securities, the granting of certificates of public convenience and necessity as to the extension of services and facilities and various other matters.
Rates that GSWC isand BVESI are authorized to charge are determined by the CPUC in general rate cases and are derived using rate base, cost of service and cost of capital, as projected for a future test year. Rates charged to customers vary according to customer class and rate jurisdiction and are generally set at levels allowing for recovery of prudently incurred costs, including a fair return on rate base. Rate base generally consists of the original cost of utility plant in service, plus certain other assets, such as working capital and inventory, less accumulated depreciation on utility plant in service, deferred income tax liabilities and certain other deductions.
GSWC is required to file a water general rate case application every three years according to a schedule established by the CPUC. General rate cases typically include an increase in the first test year with inflation-rate adjustments for expenses for the second and third years of the rate case cycle. For capital projects, there are two test years. Rates are based on a forecast of expenses and capital costs for each test year. ElectricBVESI's general rate cases are typically filed every four years. Rates may also be increased by offsets for certain expense increases, including, but not limited to, supply-cost offset and balancing-account amortization, advice letter filings related to certain plant additions and other operating cost increases.
Neither the operations of AWR nor the operations and rates of AWR and ASUS are directly regulated by the CPUC. The CPUC does, however, regulate certain transactions between GSWC, BVESI and ASUS and between GSWC and BVESI and AWR.
General Rate Case FilingsCases and Other Regulatory Matters
Water Segment:
The CPUC approved water rate increases effective January 1, 2021.These increases are expected to generate an additional $11.1 million in the adopted water gross margin for 2021 as compared to the adopted water gross margin in 2020.
Pending General Rate Case
On July 2017,15, 2020, GSWC filed a general rate case application for all of its water regions and the general office tooffice. This general rate case will determine new water rates for the years 2019 - 2021. On May 30, 2019, the CPUC issued a final decision on GSWC's water general rate case with rates retroactive to January 1, 2019.2022 – 2024. Among other things, GSWC's requested capital budgets in this application of approximately $450.6 million for the final decision approves in its entirety an August 2018 settlement agreement that had been entered into between GSWCthree-year rate cycle, and the CPUC’s Public Advocates Office. As a result, the final decision authorizes GSWC to invest approximately $334.5 million over the rate cycle. The $334.5 million of infrastructure investment includes $20.4another $11.4 million of capital projects to be filed for revenue recovery through advice letters when those projects are completed.
Final Decision on Low-Income Affordability Rulemaking
On August 15, 2019, the CPUC issued a final decision on this general rate case, adopting the settlement agreement in its entirety. Among other things, the decision (i) extends the rate cycle by one year (new rates will be effective for 2018 - 2022); (ii) increases the adopted electric gross margin for 2018 by approximately $2.3 million compared to the 2017 adopted electric gross margin, adjusted for Tax Act changes; (iii) authorizes BVES to construct all the capital projects requested in its application, which are dedicated to improving system safety and reliability and total approximately $44 million over the 5-year rate cycle; and (iv) increases the adopted electric gross margin by $1.2 million for each of the years 2019 and27, 2020, by $1.1 million in 2021, and by $1.0 million in 2022. The rate increases for 2019 - 2022 are not subject to an earnings test. The decision authorizes a return on equity for GSWC's electric segment of 9.60%, as compared to its previously authorized return of 9.95% and includes a capital structure and debt cost that is consistent with those approved by the CPUC in March 2018 in connection with GSWC's water segment cost of capital proceeding.
50
The final decision will not have any impact on GSWC's WRAM or MCBA balances during the current rate cycle (2019 – 2021).In addition, management believes that the decision supports GSWC’s position that it does not apply to its general rate case application filed in July 2020 that will set new rates for the years 20182022 – 2024. In February 2021, a procedural hearing in this pending general rate case was held, and the assigned administrative law judge in the proceeding agreed that GSWC is entitled to keep the use of the WRAM and MCBA through the year 2024. GSWC’s next general rate case application will be filed in 2023 to establish new rates for the years 2025 - 2020. Among other things,2027 and, based on the August 27, 2020 decision, may not include the WRAM or MCBA for those years. Since its implementation in 2008, the WRAM and MCBA have helped mitigate fluctuations in GSWC’s earnings due to changes in water consumption by its customers or changes in water supply mix.Replacing them with mechanisms recommended in the final decision adoptedwould result in more volatility in GSWC’s future earnings and could result in less than or more than full recovery of its authorized water gross margin.On or prior to October 5, 2020, GSWC, other California water utilities, and the California Water Association filed separate applications for GSWC'srehearing on this matter.At this time, management cannot predict the outcome of this matter.
Finance Application
In November 2019, GSWC filed a finance application with the CPUC requesting, among other things, authorization to issue additional long-term debt and equity securities not to exceed $465 million to support its water segment a returnoperations.On May 7, 2020, the CPUC approved the finance application.Following the CPUC’s approval, on equityJuly 8, 2020, GSWC completed the issuance of 8.90%, with a return on rate baseunsecured private placement notes totaling $160.0 million.
Cost of 7.91%. The previously authorized return on equity for GSWC’s water segment was 9.43%, with a return on rate base of 8.34%.Capital Proceeding
Investor-owned water utilities serving California are required to file their cost of capital applications on a triennial basis with thebasis. GSWC’s next cost of capital application is scheduled filing to take place onbe filed by May 1, 2020 effective2021 for the years 20212022 - 2023. In January 2020,2024. However, GSWC, along with the three other investor-owned water utilities requested an extensionin California, filed a joint request with the CPUC on January 5, 2021 to postpone the cost of capital applications by another year. Last year the utilities sought a one-year deferral of the date by which each of them must file itsMay 2020 cost of capital applications. Ifapplications, which was approved in March 2020. Similar to that deferral, this year’s joint request asked that the request would postpone this filing dateutilities keep the cost of capital parameters as authorized in 2018 in effect through 2022, and file new cost of capital applications by one year until May 1, 2021, with a corresponding effective date2022 to set the cost of debt, return on equity and capital structure starting January 1, 2022. As part2023. GSWC’s current authorized rate of return on rate base is 7.91%, based on its weighted cost of capital, which will continue in effect through December 31, 2022 if the additional deferral is approved. At this time, management cannot predict the outcome of this request, the joint parties agreed to leave the current Water Cost of Capital Mechanism in place, but that there will be no changes to the respective costs of capital during the one-year extension, regardless of what the mechanism might otherwise indicate. The joint parties are currently awaiting the CPUC's response to the joint request.
Completion of Electric Utility Reorganization Plan
On July 1, 2020, GSWC filed applications withcompleted the CPUC andtransfer of the FERC in December 2018 and July 2019, respectively, to transfer theelectric utility assets and liabilities from its electric division to BVESI in exchange for common shares of the BVES divisionBVESI.GSWC then immediately distributed all of GSWCBVESI's common shares to Bear Valley Electric Service, Inc., a newly created separate legal entity and stand-alone subsidiary ofAWR, whereupon BVESI became wholly owned directly by AWR. Due to the differences in operations, regulations, and risks, management believes a separate electric legal entity and stand-alone subsidiary of AWR is in the best interests of customers, employees, and the communities served. The FERC and CPUC approved GSWC's application for reorganization in October and December of 2019, respectively. The reorganization plan is pending the completion of certain closing procedures to effectuate the transfer of assets and liabilities including, among other things, an additional FERC approval for tariffs. When completed, the reorganization plan is not expected to result in aany substantive changechanges to AWR's operations andor business segments.
Recent Changes in Rates
On August 15, 2019, the CPUC issued a final decision on the electric segment's general rate case which, among other things, increases the adopted electric gross margin by $1.2 million for 2020, by $1.1 million for 2021, and by $1.0 million for 2022 (the electric rate increases are not subject to an earnings test).The rate case decision continues to apply for BVESI.
Wildfire Mitigation Plan and New California Legislation:
In September 2018, the California legislature enacted Senate Bill (SB) 901 mandating investor-owned electric utilities to submit an annual wildfire mitigation plan (WMP) to the CPUC for approval. SB 901 requires all electric utilities to prepare plans on constructing, maintaining, and operating their electrical lines and equipment to minimize the risk of catastrophic wildfire. In February 2019, BVESthe electric segment filed its first WMP, which was subsequently approved by the CPUC in June 2019. Among other things, the WMP approves capital projects and programs dedicated to improving system safety and reliability and, specifically, aimed at reducing the possibility of wildfires. Upon approval in June 2019, BVESthe electric segment commenced executing its WMP immediately. BVES filed itsBVESI's second WMP filed with the CPUC on February 7, 2020.in 2020 was approved in January 2021. Capital expenditures and other costs incurred as a result of the WMP are subject to CPUC audit.
Additionally, the California legislature enacted Assembly Bill (AB) 1054 in July 2019, which among other things, changed the burden of proof applicable in CPUC proceedings in which an electric utility with a valid safety certification seeks to recover wildfire costs. Traditionally, an electric utility seeking to recover costs hashad the burden to prove that it acted
51
reasonably. Under AB 1054, if an electric utility has a valid safety certification, it will be presumed to have acted reasonably unless a party to the relevant proceeding creates a “serious doubt” as to the reasonableness of the utility’s conduct. BVESGSWC received itsan initial safety certification for its electric division from the CPUC onin February 4, 2020.
Solar Energy Project
In December 2019, the electric division would be able to access from the Wildfire Fund.
For more information regarding significant regulatory matters, see Note 3 of “Notes to Financial Statements” included in Part II, Item 8, in Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.
Environmental Matters
AWR’s subsidiaries are subject to stringent environmental regulations. GSWC is required to comply with the safe drinking water standards established by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (“U.S. EPA”) and the Division of Drinking Water ("DDW"), under the State Water Resources Control Board ("SWRCB"). The U.S. EPA regulates contaminants that may have adverse health effects that are known or likely to occur at levels of public health concern, and the regulation of which will provide a meaningful opportunity for health risk reduction. The DDW, acting on behalf of the U.S. EPA, administers the U.S. EPA’s program in California. Similar state agencies administer these rules in the other states in which Registrant operates.
GSWC currently tests its water supplies and water systems according to, among other things, requirements listed in the Federal Safe Drinking Water Act (“SDWA”). GSWC works proactively with third parties and governmental agencies to address issues relating to known contamination threatening GSWC water sources. GSWC also incurs operating costs for testing to determine the levels, if any, of the constituents in its sources of supply and additional expense to treat contaminants in order to meet the federal and state maximum contaminant level standards and consumer demands. GSWC expects to incur additional capital costs as well as increased operating costs to maintain or improve the quality of water delivered to its customers in light of anticipated stress on water resources associated with watershed and aquifer pollution, as well as to meet future water quality standards and consumer expectations. The CPUC ratemaking process provides GSWC with the opportunity to recover prudently incurred capital and operating costs in future filings associated with achieving water quality standards. Management believes that such incurred and expected future costs should be authorized for recovery by the CPUC.
Matters Relating to Environmental Cleanup
GSWC has been involved in environmental remediation and cleanup at aone of its plant site (“Chadron Plant”)sites that contained an underground storage tank that was used to store gasoline for its vehicles. This tank was removed from the ground in July 1990 along with the dispenser and ancillary piping. Since then, GSWC has been involved in various remediation activities at this site.
As of December 31, 2019,2020, the total amount spent to cleanupclean up and remediate GSWC’s plant facility was approximately $6.3$6.4 million, of which $1.5 million has been paid by the State of California Underground Storage Tank Fund. Amounts paid by GSWC have been included in rate base and approved by the CPUC for recovery. As of December 31, 2019,2020, GSWC has a regulatory asset and an accrued liability for the estimated additional cost of $1.3 million to complete the cleanup at the site. The estimate includes costs for continued activities of groundwater cleanup and monitoring, future soil treatment, and site closure related activities. The ultimate cost may vary as there are many unknowns in remediation of underground gasoline spills and this is an estimate based on currently available information. Management also believes it is probable that the estimated additional costs will continue to be approved for inclusion in rate base by the CPUC.
Drinking Water Notification and Response Levels
In July 2018, DDW issued drinking water notification levels for certain fluorinated organic chemicals used to make certain fabrics and other materials, and used in various industrial processes. These chemicals were also present in certain fire suppression agents. These chemicals are referred to as perfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS). Notification levels are health-based advisory levels established for contaminants in drinking water for which maximum contaminant levels have not been established. The US EPA has also established health advisory levels for these compounds. Notification to consumers and stakeholders is required when the advisory levels or notification levels are exceeded. Assembly Bill 756, signed into law in July 2019 and effective in January 2020, requires, among other things, additional notification requirements for water systems detecting levels of PFAS above response levels. GSWC is in the process of collecting and analyzing samples for PFAS under the direction of DDW. GSWC has removed some wells from service, and expects to incur additional treatment costs to treat impacted wells. GSWC has provided customers with information regarding PFAS detections, and provided updated
52
information via its website. In February 2020, DDW established new response levels for two of the PFAS compounds: 10 parts per trillion for perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) and 40 parts per trillion for perfluorooctanesulfonic acid (PFOS).
Matters Relating to Military Utility Privatization Contracts
Each of the Military Utility Privatization Subsidiaries is responsible for testing the water and wastewater systems on the military bases on which it operates in accordance with applicable law.
Each of the Military Utility Privatization Subsidiaries has the right to seek an equitable adjustment to its contract in the event that there are changes in environmental laws, a change in the quality of water used in providing water service or wastewater discharged by the U.S. government, or contamination of the air or soil not caused by the fault or negligence of the Military Utility Privatization Subsidiary. These changes can impact operations and maintenance and renewal and replacement costs under the contracts. The U.S. government is responsible for environmental contamination due to its fault or negligence and for environmental contamination that occurred prior to the execution of a contract.
Security Issues
We have physical and information security policies throughout our operations. Training on these matters begins during employee orientation and is ongoing through a series of training courses in addition to periodic, unannounced training exercises. We collaborate with various agencies, associations and third parties regarding information on possible threats and security measures for our operations. Risk assessments are conducted periodically to evaluate the effectiveness of existing security controls. These assessments provide areas for additional security focus, new controls, and policy changes.
Both GSWC hasand BVESI have security systems and infrastructure in place intended to prevent unlawful intrusion, service disruption and cyber-attacks. GSWC utilizesand BVESI utilize a variety of physical security measures to protect itstheir facilities. GSWC also considersThese measures consider advances in security and emergency preparedness technology and relevant industry developments in developing itstheir respective capital-improvement plans. GSWC intendsplans, and both intend to seek approval of the CPUC to recover any additional costs that it incurseither may incur in enhancing the security, reliability and resiliency of itstheir utility systems.
On October 23, 2018, America’s Water Infrastructure Act (AWIA) became law. GSWC must now conduct additional risk and resilience assessments and develop emergency response plans for each of our water systems. These assessments and electric systems.plans include natural hazards as well as malevolent acts. The first such assessments were completed in 2020. They will be reviewed and resubmitted every five years.
The Military Utility Privatization Subsidiaries operate facilities within the boundaries of military bases, which provide limited access to the general public. To further enhance security, in prior years, certain upgrades were completed at various military bases through contract modifications funded by the U.S. government.
Registrant has evaluated its cyber-security systems and continues to address identified areas of improvement with respect to U.S. government regulations regarding cyber-security of government contractors. These improvements include the physical security at all of the office and employee facilities it operates. Registrant believes it is in compliance with these regulations.
Despite its efforts, Registrant cannot guarantee that intrusions, cyber-attacks or other attacks will not cause water or electric system problems, disrupt service to customers, compromise important data or systems or result in unintended release of customer or employee information.
GSWC’s Water Supply
During 2019,2020, GSWC delivered approximately 59.563.0 million hundred cubic feet (“ccf”) of water to its customers, which is an average of about 374396 acre-feet per day or 129 million gallons per day (an acre-foot is approximately 435.6 ccf or 326,000 gallons). Approximately 53%55% of GSWC's supply came from groundwater productionproduced from wells situated throughout GSWC’s service areas. GSWC supplemented its groundwater production with wholesale purchases from Metropolitan Water District ("MWD") member agencies and regional water suppliers (roughly 44%43% of total demand) and with authorized diversions from rivers (roughly 3%2%) under contracts with the United States Bureau of Reclamation (“Bureau”) and the Sacramento Municipal Utility District (“SMUD”). GSWC also utilizes recycled water supplies to serve recycled water customers in several service areas. GSWC continually assesses its water rights and groundwater storage assets.assets to maximize use of lower cost groundwater sources where available.
Groundwater
GSWC has a diverse water supply portfolio which includes adjudicated groundwater rights, surface water rights, and a number of unadjudicated water rights to help meet supply requirements. The productivity of GSWC’s groundwater resources varies from year to year depending upon a variety of factors, including natural replenishment from snow-melt or rainfall, the availability of imported replenishment water, the amount of water previously stored in groundwater basins, natural or man-mademan-
53
made contamination, legal production limitations, and the amount and seasonality of water use by GSWC’s customers and others. GSWC actively participates in efforts to protect groundwater basins from over-use and from contamination. In some periods, these efforts may require reductions in groundwater pumping and increased reliance on alternative water resources. GSWC also participates in implementation of California’s Sustainable Groundwater Management Act.
From time to time, GSWC may purchase or temporarily use water rights from others for delivery to customers. GSWC has contracts to purchase water or water rights for an aggregate amount of $4.1$3.8 million as of December 31, 2019.2020. Included in the $4.1$3.8 million is a remaining commitment of $2.1$1.9 million under an agreement with the City of Claremont (“the City”) to lease water rights that were ascribed to the City as part of the Six Basins adjudication. The initial term of the agreement expires in 2028. GSWC may exercise an option to renew this agreement for 10 additional years. The remaining $2.0$1.9 million is for commitments for purchased water with other third parties, which expire through 2038.
Imported Water
GSWC also manages a portfolio of water supply arrangements with water wholesalers who may import water from outside the immediate service area. For example, GSWC has contracts with various governmental entities (principally MWD member agencies) and other parties to purchase water through a total of 58 connections for distribution to customers, in addition to numerous emergency connections. MWD is a public agency organized and managed to provide a supplemental, imported supply to its member public agencies. There are 26 such member agencies, consisting of 14 cities, 11 municipal water districts and one county water authority. GSWC has 45 connections to MWD’s water distribution facilities and those of member agencies. GSWC purchases MWD water through six separate member agencies aggregating 49,97351,237 acre-feet annually. MWD’s principal source of water is the SWP andMWD sources its supplies from the Colorado River from Northern California via the State Water Project through the Colorado River Aqueduct.Aqueduct, which it owns and operates, and from local programs and transfer arrangements. MWD currently has storage reserve levels of 3.2 million acre-feet (MAF) with annual demands of approximately 1.6 MAF. MWD has available access to store more than 1.65 MAF of water in Lake Mead as part of an intentionally created surplus (ICS) program developed under a 2007 Interim Shortage agreement and is available for use during dry years. In addition, MWD, along with the seven other Basin states which use water from the Colorado River,developed and agreed to the Drought Contingency Plan (DCP) in 2019 where each lower state which diverts water from the Colorado River below Lees Ferry agrees to store defined amounts of water in Lake Mead to prevent both Lake Mead and Lake Powell from reaching critically low levels.
Drought Impact
In May 2018, the California Legislature passed two bills that provide a framework for long-term water-use efficiency standards and drought planning and resiliency. The initial steps in implementation of this legislation has been laid out in a summary document by the California Department of Water Resources ("DWR") and State Water Resources Control Board ("SWQCB"SWRCB"). Over the next several years, State agencies, water suppliers and other entities will be working to meet the requirements and timelines of plan implementation. A notable milestone is the establishment of an indoor water use standard of 55 gallons per capita per day (gpcd) until 2025 at which time the standard may be reduced to 52.5 gpcd or a newother standard as recommend by DWR.
California's recent period of multi-year drought resulted in reduced recharge to the state's groundwater basins. GSWC utilizes groundwater from numerous groundwater basins throughout the state. Several of these basins, especially smaller basins, experienced lower groundwater levels because of the drought. Several of GSWC's service areas rely on groundwater as their only source of supply. Given the critical nature of the groundwater levels in California’s Central Coast area, GSWC implemented mandatory water restrictions in certain service areas, in accordance with CPUC procedures. In the event of water supply shortages beyond the locally available supply, GSWC would need to transport additional water from other areas, increasing the cost of water supply.
remain in place for customers in some of GSWC’s service areas. GSWC continues assessing water supply conditions and water-use restrictions in these service areas and willintends to make appropriate adjustments as needed.
54
Military Utility Privatization Subsidiaries
The U.S. government is responsible for providing the source of supply for all water on each of the bases served by the Military Utility Privatization Subsidiaries at no cost to the Military Utility Privatization Subsidiaries. Once received from the U.S. government, ASUS isASUS's subsidiaries are responsible for ensuring the continued compliance of the provided source of supply with all federal, state and local regulations.
New Accounting Pronouncements
Registrant is subject to newly issued accounting requirements as well as changes in existing requirements issued by the Financial Accounting Standards Board. See Note 1 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
55
Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
Registrant is exposed to certain market risks, including fluctuations in interest rates, and commodity price risk primarily relating to changes in the market price of electricity. Market risk is the potential loss arising from adverse changes in prevailing market rates and prices.
Interest Rate Risk
A significant portion of Registrant’s capital structure is comprised of fixed-rate debt. Market risk related to our fixed-rate debt is deemed to be the potential increase in fair value resulting from a decrease in interest rates. At December 31, 2019,2020, the fair value of Registrant’s long-term debt was $376.5$559.8 million. A hypothetical ten percent decrease in market interest rates would have resulted in an $11.6$13.5 million increase in the fair value of Registrant’s long-term debt.
At December 31, 2019,2020, Registrant did not believe that its short-term debt was subject to interest-rate risk due to the fair market value being approximately equal to the carrying value.
Commodity/Derivative Risk
In August 2019, the CPUC authorized BVESBVESI to execute long-term purchased power contracts with energy providers, which became effective during the fourth quarter of 2019. BVESBVESI began taking power under these long-term contracts at a fixed cost over three- and five-year terms depending on the amount of power and period during which the power is purchased under the contracts.
The long-term contracts executed in 2019 qualify for derivative accounting treatment. Among other things, the CPUC also authorized BVESBVESI to establish a regulatory memorandum account to offset the mark-to-market entries required by the accounting guidance. Accordingly, all unrealized gains and losses generated from these purchased power contracts are deferred on a monthly basis into a non-interest bearing regulatory memorandum account that tracks the changes in fair value of the derivative throughout the term of the contract. As a result, the unrealized gains and losses on these contracts do not impact GSWC’sRegistrant's earnings. As of December 31, 2019,2020, there was a $3.2$1.5 million unrealized loss in the memorandum account reflected as a regulatory asset as a result of a drop in energy prices since the execution of the contracts.
Except as discussed above, Registrant has had no other derivative financial instruments, financial instruments with significant off-balance sheet risks or financial instruments with concentrations of credit risk.
56
Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data
| American States Water Company | |||||
| Golden State Water Company | |||||
57
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
To the Board of Directors and Shareholders of American States Water Company
Opinions on the Financial Statements and Internal Control over Financial Reporting
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets and statements of capitalization of American States Water Company and its subsidiaries (the “Company”) as of December 31, 20192020 and 2018,2019, and the related consolidated statements of income, of changes in common shareholders' equity and of cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2019,2020, including the related notes and the financial statement schedule listed in the index appearing under Item 15(a)(2) (collectively referred to as the “consolidated financial statements”). We also have audited the Company's internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2019,2020, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of December 31, 20192020 and 2018,2019, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 20192020 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Also in our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2019,2020, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the COSO.
Basis for Opinions
The Company's management is responsible for these consolidated financial statements, for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting, and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting appearing under Item 9A. Our responsibility is to express opinions on the Company’s consolidated financial statements and on the Company's internal control over financial reporting based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB) and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud, and whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects.
Our audits of the consolidated financial statements included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the consolidated financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the consolidated financial statements. Our audit of internal control over financial reporting included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audits also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinions.
Definition and Limitations of Internal Control over Financial Reporting
A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (i) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (ii) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
Critical Audit Matters
58
The critical audit mattersmatter communicated below are mattersis a matter arising from the current period audit of the consolidated financial statements that werewas communicated or required to be communicated to the audit committee and that (i) relaterelates to accounts or disclosures that are material to the consolidated financial statements and (ii) involved our especially challenging, subjective, or complex judgments. The communication of critical audit matters does not alter in any way our opinion on the consolidated financial statements, taken as a whole, and we are not, by communicating the critical audit mattersmatter below, providing a separate opinionsopinion on the critical audit mattersmatter or on the accounts or disclosures to which they relate.
Accounting for the Effects of Rate Regulation
As described in Notes 1 and 3 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company records regulatory assets, which represent probable future recoveryrecoveries of costs from customers through the ratemaking process, and regulatory liabilities, which represent probable future refunds that are to be credited to customers through the ratemaking process. Accounting for such activities as regulatory assets and liabilities is in accordance with the guidance for accounting for the effects of rate regulation. In determining the probability of costs being recognized in other periods, management considers regulatory rules and decisions, past practices and other facts or circumstances that would indicate if recovery is probable. As of December 31, 2019,2020, there were $21$17 million of regulatory assets and $23 million of regulatory liabilities.assets.
The principal considerations for our determination that performing procedures relating to accounting for the effects of rate regulation is a critical audit matter are there wasthe significant judgment by management related toin the accounting for regulatory assets and liabilities includingrelated to assessing the probability that costs will be recovered or that amounts will be refunded, and the timing of recognition of regulatory assets and liabilities as a result of established practice, new or changes in regulatory and legislative proceedings, or other relevant facts and circumstances. This in turn led to significant auditor judgment, subjectivity and effort in performing audit procedures and evaluating audit evidence obtained relating to management’s accounting for regulatory assets and liabilities.
Addressing the matter involved performing procedures and evaluating audit evidence in connection with forming our overall opinion on the consolidated financial statements. These procedures included testing the effectiveness of controls relating to management’s assessment and consideration of regulatory and legislative proceedings and other evidence informing the probability that costs will be recovered, and amounts will be refunded, and the timing of the inclusion of these deferrals in rates as well as the disclosure impacts. These procedures also included, among others, evaluating the reasonableness of management’s judgments regarding the probability and timing of recovery of regulatory assets and refund of regulatory liabilities based on the Company’s correspondence with regulators, status of regulatory proceedings, past practices, and other relevant information; evaluating the related accounting and disclosure implications; and calculating regulatory assets and liabilities balances based on provisions and formulas outlined in rate orders and other correspondence with the Company’s regulator.
/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Los Angeles, California
February 24, 202022, 2021
We have served as the Company’s auditor since 2002.
59
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
TotheBoard of Directors and Shareholder of Golden State Water Company
Opinion on the Financial Statements
We have audited the accompanying balance sheets and statements of capitalization of Golden State Water Company (the “Company”) as of December 31, 20192020 and 2018,2019, and the related statements of income, of changes in common shareholder’s equity and of cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2019,2020, including the related notes (collectively referred to as the “financial statements”). In our opinion, the financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of December 31, 20192020 and 2018,2019, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 20192020 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
Basis for Opinion
These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB) and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audits of these financial statements in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the auditsaudit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. As part of our audits we are required to obtain an understanding of internal control over financial reporting but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company's internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion.
Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of thefinancial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of thefinancial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
Critical Audit Matters
The critical audit matter communicated below is a matter arising from the current period audit of the financial statements that was communicated or required to be communicated to the audit committee and that (i) relates to accounts or disclosures that are material to the financial statements and (ii) involved our especially challenging, subjective, or complex judgments. The communication of critical audit matters does not alter in any way our opinion on the financial statements, taken as a whole, and we are not, by communicating the critical audit matter below, providing a separate opinion on the critical audit matter or on the accounts or disclosures to which it relates.
Accounting for the Effects of Rate Regulation
As described in Notes 1 and 3 to the financial statements, the Company records regulatory assets, which represent probable future recoveries of costs from customers through the ratemaking process, and regulatory liabilities, which represent probable future refunds that are to be credited to customers through the ratemaking process. Accounting for such activities as regulatory assets and liabilities is in accordance with the guidance for accounting for the effects of rate regulation. In determining the probability of costs being recognized in other periods, management considers regulatory rules and decisions, past practices and other facts or circumstances that would indicate if recovery is probable. As of December 31, 2020, there were $12 million of regulatory assets.
The principal considerations for our determination that performing procedures relating to accounting for the effects of rate regulation is a critical audit matter are the significant judgment by management in the accounting for regulatory assets and liabilities related to assessing the probability that costs will be recovered or that amounts will be refunded, the timing of recognition of regulatory assets and liabilities as a result of established practice, new or changes in regulatory and legislative proceedings, or other relevant facts and circumstances. This in turn led to significant auditor judgment, subjectivity and effort in performing audit procedures and evaluating audit evidence obtained relating to management’s accounting for regulatory assets and liabilities.
60
Addressing the matter involved performing procedures and evaluating audit evidence in connection with forming our overall opinion on the financial statements. These procedures included testing the effectiveness of controls relating to management’s assessment and consideration of regulatory and legislative proceedings and other evidence informing the probability that costs will be recovered, and amounts will be refunded, and the timing of the inclusion of these deferrals in rates as well as the disclosure impacts. These procedures also included, among others, evaluating the reasonableness of management’s judgments regarding the probability and timing of recovery of regulatory assets and refund of regulatory liabilities based on the Company’s correspondence with regulators, status of regulatory proceedings, past practices, and other relevant information; evaluating the related accounting and disclosure implications; and calculating regulatory assets and liabilities balances based on provisions and formulas outlined in rate orders and other correspondence with the Company’s regulator.
/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Los Angeles, California
February 24, 202022, 2021
We have served as the Company’sCompany's auditor since 2002.2002.
61
| December 31, | December 31, | |||||||||||||||||||||
| (in thousands) | 2019 | 2018 | (in thousands) | 2020 | 2019 | |||||||||||||||||
| Assets | Assets | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Utility Plant | Utility Plant | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Regulated utility plant, at cost: | Regulated utility plant, at cost: | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Water | $ | 1,700,442 | $ | 1,649,535 | Water | $ | 1,784,402 | $ | 1,700,442 | |||||||||||||
| Electric | 108,425 | 106,064 | Electric | 112,507 | 108,425 | |||||||||||||||||
| Total | 1,808,867 | 1,755,599 | Total | 1,896,909 | 1,808,867 | |||||||||||||||||
| Non-regulated utility property, at cost | 30,554 | 24,511 | Non-regulated utility property, at cost | 33,315 | 30,554 | |||||||||||||||||
| Total utility plant, at cost | 1,839,421 | 1,780,110 | Total utility plant, at cost | 1,930,224 | 1,839,421 | |||||||||||||||||
| Less — accumulated depreciation | (543,263 | ) | (561,855 | ) | Less — accumulated depreciation | (568,326) | (543,263) | |||||||||||||||
| 1,296,158 | 1,218,255 | 1,361,898 | 1,296,158 | |||||||||||||||||||
| Construction work in progress | 119,547 | 78,055 | Construction work in progress | 150,145 | 119,547 | |||||||||||||||||
| Net utility plant | 1,415,705 | 1,296,310 | Net utility plant | 1,512,043 | 1,415,705 | |||||||||||||||||
| Other Property and Investments | Other Property and Investments | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Goodwill | 1,116 | 1,116 | Goodwill | 1,116 | 1,116 | |||||||||||||||||
| Other property and investments | 30,293 | 25,356 | Other property and investments | 35,318 | 30,293 | |||||||||||||||||
| Total other property and investments | 31,409 | 26,472 | Total other property and investments | 36,434 | 31,409 | |||||||||||||||||
| Current Assets | Current Assets | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Cash and cash equivalents | 1,334 | 7,141 | Cash and cash equivalents | 36,737 | 1,334 | |||||||||||||||||
| Accounts receivable — customers, less allowance for doubtful accounts | 20,907 | 23,395 | Accounts receivable — customers, less allowance for doubtful accounts | 29,162 | 20,907 | |||||||||||||||||
| Unbilled revenue — receivable | 20,482 | 23,588 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Unbilled revenue — receivable (Note 2) | Unbilled revenue — receivable (Note 2) | 25,836 | 20,482 | |||||||||||||||||||
| Receivable from U.S. government, less allowance for doubtful accounts (Note 2) | 22,613 | 21,543 | Receivable from U.S. government, less allowance for doubtful accounts (Note 2) | 25,182 | 22,613 | |||||||||||||||||
| Other accounts receivable, less allowance for doubtful accounts | 3,096 | 3,103 | Other accounts receivable, less allowance for doubtful accounts | 3,960 | 3,096 | |||||||||||||||||
| Income taxes receivable | 5,685 | 2,164 | Income taxes receivable | 103 | 5,685 | |||||||||||||||||
| Materials and supplies | 6,429 | 5,775 | Materials and supplies | 8,619 | 6,429 | |||||||||||||||||
| Regulatory assets — current | 20,930 | 16,527 | Regulatory assets — current | 13,088 | 20,930 | |||||||||||||||||
| Prepayments and other current assets | 5,413 | 6,063 | Prepayments and other current assets | 5,555 | 5,413 | |||||||||||||||||
| Contract assets (Note 2) | 15,567 | 22,169 | Contract assets (Note 2) | 8,873 | 15,567 | |||||||||||||||||
| Total current assets | 122,456 | 131,468 | Total current assets | 157,115 | 122,456 | |||||||||||||||||
| Other Assets | Other Assets | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Unbilled revenue — receivable from U.S. government | 8,621 | — | Unbilled revenue — receivable from U.S. government | 9,945 | 8,621 | |||||||||||||||||
| Receivable from U.S. government (Note 2) | 42,206 | 39,583 | Receivable from U.S. government (Note 2) | 49,488 | 42,206 | |||||||||||||||||
| Contract assets (Note 2) | 64 | 2,278 | Contract assets (Note 2) | 1,384 | 64 | |||||||||||||||||
| Operating lease right-of-use assets | 13,168 | — | Operating lease right-of-use assets | 11,146 | 13,168 | |||||||||||||||||
| Regulatory assets | Regulatory assets | 3,451 | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||
| Other | 7,702 | 5,322 | Other | 10,597 | 7,702 | |||||||||||||||||
| Total other assets | 71,761 | 47,183 | Total other assets | 86,011 | 71,761 | |||||||||||||||||
| Total Assets | $ | 1,641,331 | $ | 1,501,433 | Total Assets | $ | 1,791,603 | $ | 1,641,331 | |||||||||||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
| December 31, | December 31, | |||||||||||||||||||||
| (in thousands) | 2019 | 2018 | (in thousands) | 2020 | 2019 | |||||||||||||||||
| Capitalization and Liabilities | Capitalization and Liabilities | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Capitalization | Capitalization | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Common shareholders’ equity | $ | 601,530 | $ | 558,223 | Common shareholders’ equity | $ | 641,673 | $ | 601,530 | |||||||||||||
| Long-term debt | 280,996 | 281,087 | Long-term debt | 440,348 | 280,996 | |||||||||||||||||
| Total capitalization | 882,526 | 839,310 | Total capitalization | 1,082,021 | 882,526 | |||||||||||||||||
| Current Liabilities | Current Liabilities | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Notes payable to banks | 5,000 | — | Notes payable to banks | 0 | 5,000 | |||||||||||||||||
| Long-term debt — current | 344 | 40,320 | Long-term debt — current | 358 | 344 | |||||||||||||||||
| Accounts payable | 55,616 | 59,532 | Accounts payable | 63,788 | 55,616 | |||||||||||||||||
| Income taxes payable | 95 | 360 | Income taxes payable | 6,783 | 95 | |||||||||||||||||
| Accrued other taxes | 11,110 | 10,094 | Accrued other taxes | 11,902 | 11,110 | |||||||||||||||||
| Accrued employee expenses | 14,255 | 13,842 | Accrued employee expenses | 15,122 | 14,255 | |||||||||||||||||
| Accrued interest | 3,050 | 3,865 | Accrued interest | 4,832 | 3,050 | |||||||||||||||||
| Unrealized loss on purchased power contracts | 3,171 | 311 | Unrealized loss on purchased power contracts | 1,537 | 3,171 | |||||||||||||||||
| Contract liabilities (Note 2) | 11,167 | 7,530 | Contract liabilities (Note 2) | 1,800 | 11,167 | |||||||||||||||||
| Operating lease liabilities | 1,849 | — | Operating lease liabilities | 2,013 | 1,849 | |||||||||||||||||
| Other | 10,341 | 10,731 | Other | 10,437 | 10,341 | |||||||||||||||||
| Total current liabilities | 115,998 | 146,585 | Total current liabilities | 118,572 | 115,998 | |||||||||||||||||
| Other Credits | Other Credits | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Notes payable to banks | 200,000 | 95,500 | Notes payable to banks | 134,200 | 200,000 | |||||||||||||||||
| Advances for construction | 63,989 | 66,305 | Advances for construction | 63,374 | 63,989 | |||||||||||||||||
| Contributions in aid of construction — net | 134,706 | 124,385 | Contributions in aid of construction — net | 140,332 | 134,706 | |||||||||||||||||
| Deferred income taxes | 125,304 | 114,216 | Deferred income taxes | 131,172 | 125,304 | |||||||||||||||||
| Regulatory liabilities | 23,380 | 44,867 | Regulatory liabilities | 0 | 23,380 | |||||||||||||||||
| Unamortized investment tax credits | 1,295 | 1,367 | Unamortized investment tax credits | 1,224 | 1,295 | |||||||||||||||||
| Accrued pension and other post-retirement benefits | 68,469 | 57,636 | Accrued pension and other post-retirement benefits | 95,639 | 68,469 | |||||||||||||||||
| Operating lease liabilities | 11,739 | — | Operating lease liabilities | 9,636 | 11,739 | |||||||||||||||||
| Other | 13,925 | 11,262 | Other | 15,433 | 13,925 | |||||||||||||||||
| Total other credits | 642,807 | 515,538 | Total other credits | 591,010 | 642,807 | |||||||||||||||||
| Commitments and Contingencies (Notes 14 and 15) | — | — | Commitments and Contingencies (Notes 14 and 15) | 0 | 0 | |||||||||||||||||
| Total Capitalization and Liabilities | $ | 1,641,331 | $ | 1,501,433 | Total Capitalization and Liabilities | $ | 1,791,603 | $ | 1,641,331 | |||||||||||||