Table of Contents

 

 

 

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

 

FORM 10-K

 

ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2017 2018

or

TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from                    to

Commission File Number: 1-32731

 

CHIPOTLE MEXICAN GRILL, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

 

 

Delaware

84-1219301

(State or other jurisdiction of

incorporation or organization)

(IRS Employer

Identification No.)

1401 Wynkoop Street,610 Newport Center Drive, Suite 500 Denver, CO1300 Newport Beach, CA

8020292660

(Address of Principal Executive Offices)

(Zip Code)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (303) 595-4000

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: 

 



 

Title of each class

 

Name of each exchange on which registered

 

Common stock, par value $0.01 per share

New York Stock Exchange

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None

 

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.     Yes  ☒    No  ☐ 

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act.     Yes  ☐    No  ☒

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.     Yes  ☒    No  ☐ 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).     Yes  ☒    Yes    ☐  No  ☐.

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (§229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.   

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company,” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act (check one):



 Large accelerated filer

☐ Accelerated filer

☐ Non-accelerated filer

 Accelerated filer

 Non-accelerated filer (do not check if a smaller reporting company)

Smaller reporting company

Emerging growth company

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act.  ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act).     Yes  ☐   No  ☒ 

As of June 30, 2017,2018, the aggregate market value of the registrant’s outstanding common equity held by non-affiliates was $7.075$8.726 billion, based on the closing price of the registrant’s common stock on such date,June 29, 2018, the last trading day of the registrant’s most recently completed second fiscal quarter. For purposes of this calculation, shares of common stock held by each executive officer and director and by holders of 5% or more of the outstanding common stock have been excluded since those persons may under certain circumstances be deemed to be affiliates. This determination of affiliate status is not necessarily a conclusive determination for other purposes.

As of February 6, 2018,4, 2019, there were 27,930,27227,659,270 shares of the registrant’s common stock, par value of $0.01 per share outstanding.


Table of Contents

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

Part III incorporates certain information by reference from the registrant’s definitive proxy statement for the 20182019 annual meeting of shareholders, which will be filed no later than 120 days after the close of the registrant’s fiscal year ended December 31, 2017.2018. 

 


 

Table of Contents

 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

 

PART I

Item 1.

Business

Item 1A.

Risk Factors

Item 1B.

Unresolved Staff Comments

2526 

Item 2.

Properties

2627 

Item 3.

Legal Proceedings

2728 

Item 4.

Mine Safety Disclosures

2728 

PART II

Item 5.

Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

2829 

Item 6.

Selected Financial Data

3031 

Item 7.

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

3132 

Item 7A.

Quantitative and Qualitative DisclosuresDisclosure About Market Risk

3940 

Item 8.

Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

4041 

Item 9.

Changes in and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure

6266 

Item 9A.

Controls and Procedures

6266 

Item 9B.

Other Information

6468 

PART III

Item 10.

Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance

6468 

Item 11.

Executive Compensation

6468 

Item 12.

Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters

6468 

Item 13.

Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence

6468 

Item 14.

Principal Accounting Fees and Services

6568 

PART IV

Item 15.

Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules

6669 

Item 16.

Form 10-K Summary

6771 



Signatures

6872 

 

 

 


 

Table of Contents

 

PART I

Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements

This report includes statements of our expectations, intentions, plans and beliefs that constitute “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), and that are intended to come within the safe harbor protection provided by those sections. These statements, which involve risks and uncertainties, relate to the discussion of our business strategies and our expectations concerning future operations, margins, profitability, trends, liquidity and capital resources and to analyses and other information that are based on forecasts of future results and estimates of amounts not yet determinable. Forward-looking statements include, among others, forecasts of the number of restaurants we expect to open in 2018; statements regarding the effectiveness of our food safety systems and procedures; statements about the potential impact of catering and delivery offerings and technology initiatives; statements regarding the effectiveness of our food safety systems and procedures; projections of comparable restaurant sales increases and sales trends we expect for 2018;2019; estimates of restructuring and restaurant closure costs and accelerated depreciation to be recognized in 2019; forecasts of the number of restaurants we expect to open; forecasts of trends in general and administrative expenses, restaurant development costs, and other expenses for 2018;2019; estimates of expected effective tax rates for the year; statements about possible repurchases of our common stock; projections of planned capital expenditures; and other statements of our expectations and plans. We have used words such as “may,” “will,” “should,” “expect,” “intend,” “plan,” “anticipate,” “believe,” “think,” “estimate,” “seek,” “expect,” “predict,” “could,” “project,” “potential” and other similar terms and phrases, including references to assumptions, in this report to identify forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements are made based on expectations and beliefs concerning future events affecting us and are subject to risks and uncertainties relating to our operations and business environments, all of which are difficult to predict and many of which are beyond our control, that could cause our actual results to differ materially from those matters expressed or implied by these forward-looking statements. Such risks and uncertainties include those listed in Item 1A. “Risk Factors,” and elsewhere in this report.

When considering forward-looking statements in this report or that we make in other reports or statements, you should keep in mind the cautionary statements in this report and future reports we file with the SEC. New risks and uncertainties arise from time to time, and we cannot predict when they may arise or how they may affect us. We assume no obligation to update any forward-looking statements after the date of this report as a result of new information, future events or other developments, except as required by applicable laws and regulations.

ITEM 1.BUSINESS

General

Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc., a Delaware corporation, together with its subsidiaries (“Chipotle”, “we”, “us”, or “our”) operates Chipotle Mexican Grill restaurants, which servefeature a focusedrelevant menu of burritos, tacos, burrito bowls (a burrito without the tortilla), tacos, and salads, made using fresh ingredients.salads. We are passionate about serving great food and providing a great guest experience, and we are a longtime leader and innovator in the food industry. When Steve Ells, founder and Executive Chairman, first opened Chipotle starting with a single restaurant in Denver, Colorado in 1993, the idea was simple: show that food served fast didn't have to be a typical “fast-food” experience. Using high-quality real ingredients, classic cooking techniques, and distinctive interior design, we brought features from the realm of fine dining to the world of quick-service restaurants. Over 25 years later, our devotion to seeking out the very best ingredients, raised with respect for animals, farmers, and the environment, remains at the core of our commitment to Food With Integrity. As of December 31, 2017,2018, we operated 2,3632,452 Chipotle restaurants throughout the United States, as well as 37 international Chipotle restaurants, and we also had eighttwo non-Chipotle restaurants.

Business Strategy

We focus on finding fresh, high-quality raw ingredientsare committed to make great tastingmaking our food prepared using classic cooking methods; on building strong restaurant teams that are centered on providing an excellent guest experience; on building restaurants that are operationally efficient and aesthetically pleasing; and on doing all of this with the highest regard for the safety of our customers andmore accessible to everyone while continuing to be a brand with a continuing awarenessdemonstrated purpose of cultivating a better world. Our strategy is to win today and respect forcultivate the environment. We have grown substantially over the pastfuture by focusing on five years, and expect to open between 130 and 150 new restaurants in 2018, representing a slight reduction in our rate of new openings as we focus our resources on improving our operations and delivering an outstanding experience to every one of our guests.key pillars which include:

·

becoming a more culturally relevant and engaging brand that builds love and loyalty;

·

digitizing and modernizing our restaurant experience to create a more convenient and enjoyable guest experience;

·

running great restaurants with great hospitality and throughput;

·

being disciplined and focused to enhance our powerful economic model; and

·

building a great culture that can innovate and execute across digital, access, menu and the restaurant experience.

Throughout our history, we have pursued a mission to change the way people think about and eat fast food. The fast food landscape has changed dramatically over Chipotle’s 24-year history suggesting that we may have achieved this mission, with a number of concepts built using service and sourcing formats that closely resemble ours – with more selective sourcing, food prepared on-site, and a service model that allows customers to choose exactly what they eat. Looking at what we have accomplished, we have reenvisioned our purpose, and are working to Cultivate nourished communities where wholesome food is enjoyed every day. We are also aiming to simplify our business focus, to emphasize only those things that result in an excellent guest experience in our restaurants.

We transitioned the management of our restaurants from eleven to nine regions during the fourth quarter of 2017 and we aggregate our operations into one reportable segment. Financial information about our operations, including our revenues and net income for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016, and 2015, and our total assets as of December 31, 2017 and 2016, is included in our consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes in Item 8. “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.” Substantially all of our revenues are generated and assets are located in the U.S.  For a discussion of risks related to our international

3


Table of Contents

operations, see “Risks Related to Our Plans to Improve Our Sales and Profitability and Restore Our Economic Model – Our expansion into international marketshas been limited, and may present increased risks due to lower customer awareness of our brand… ” in Item 1A. “Risk Factors.”

Our Focus on Safe and Delicious Food Made with Better Ingredients

FocusedRelevant Menu. ChipotleOur restaurants feature only a few entrée items:relevant menu of burritos, burrito bowls, tacos and salads. But because customers can choose from four different meats, tofu, two types of beans, and a variety of extras such as salsas, guacamole, queso, shredded cheese, and lettuce, there is enough variety to extend our menu to provide thousands of choices. In preparing our food, we employ classic cooking methods and use stoves and grills, pots and pans, cutting knives and other kitchen utensils, walk-in refrigerators stocked with a variety of fresh ingredients, herbs and spices, and dry goods such as rice. Our restaurants do not have microwaves or freezers. Ingredients we useOur proteins include chicken, steak, carnitas (seasoned and braised pork), barbacoa (spicy braised and

3


Table of Contents

shredded beef), Sofritas (organic braised tofu) and vegetarian pinto and black beans. We add our rice, which is tossed with lime juice, freshly chopped cilantro, and a pinch of salt, as well as freshly shredded cheese, sour cream, lettuce, and sautéed peppers and onions, to our entrees depending on each customer’sguest’s request. We use various herbs, spices and seasonings to prepare our meats and vegetables. We also serve tortilla chips that are fried twice a day in each restaurant and seasoned with fresh lime juice and salt, with sides of hand mashed guacamole, salsas, or queso. In addition to sodas, fruit and tea drinks, and organic milk, most of our restaurants also offer a selection of beer and margaritas. Our food is prepared from scratch, some in our restaurants and some with the same fresh ingredients in larger batches in commissaries.

Wholesome Food.Food with Integrity. Serving high quality food while still charging reasonable prices is critical to our purpose so that guests can enjoy wholesome food every day. We respect our environment and insist on preparing, cooking, and serving nutritious food made from natural ingredients and animals that are raised or grown with care and with respect for the environment.care. We spend time on farms and in the field to understand where our food comes from and how it is raised. Because our menu is so focused, we canWe concentrate on the sourcessourcing of each ingredient, and this has become a cornerstone of our continuous effort to improve the food we serve. The food we serve is made from just 51 ingredients that everyone can both recognize and pronounce. We're all about simple, fresh food without the use of artificial colors or flavors typically found in fast food—just genuine rawreal ingredients and their individual, delectable flavors.

In all of our Chipotle restaurants, we endeavor to serve only meats that wereare raised in accordance with criteria we have established in an effort to improve sustainability and promote animal welfare, and without the use of non-therapeutic antibiotics or added hormones. We brand these meats as “Responsibly Raised ®.”  One of our primary goals is for all of our restaurants to serve meats raised to meet our standards, but we have and willexpect to continue to face challenges in doing so.  For example, some of our restaurants periodically serve conventionally raised chicken or beef from time to time due to supply constraints for our Responsibly Raised brand meats. In the future, more of our restaurants may periodically serve conventionally raised meats, or stop serving one or more menu items due to additional supply constraints. When we become aware that one or more of our restaurants will serve conventionally raised meat,such an issue, we clearly and specifically disclose this temporary change on signage in each affected restaurant so that customersguests can avoid those meatsadjust their orders if they choose to do so.

We also seek to use more responsibly grown produce, by which we mean produce grown by suppliers whose practices conform to our priorities with respect to environmental considerations and employee welfare. MostSome of the beans we serve are organically grown or grown using conservation tillage methods that improve soil conditions, reduce erosion, and help preserve the environment in which the beans are grown. A portion of someWe call these beans “transitional”. Some of the other produce items we serve isare organically grown as well. Our commitment to better ingredients also extends to the dairy products we serve. In 2017,2018, all of the sour cream and shredded cheese served in our U.S. Chipotle restaurants was made with milk that comes from cows not given rBGH (recombinant bovine growth hormone) and sourced from pasture-based dairies that provide an even higher standard of animal welfare by providing outdoor access for their cows.

In addition, none of the ingredients in our food (not including(excluding beverages) in U.S. Chipotle restaurants contain genetically modified organisms, or GMOs. While the meat and poultry we serve is not genetically modified, many of the animals are likely fed a diet of grains containing GMOs. Due to the prevalence of GMOs in a number of important feed crops, the vast majority of the grains used as animal feed in the U.S. are genetically modified. Additionally, some of the beverages we serve are sweetened with corn-basedcorn-based sweeteners, which are typically made with genetically modified corn.

Purchasing and Food Safety

Close Relationships with Suppliers. Maintaining the high levels of quality and safety we expect in our restaurants depends in part on our ability to acquire high-quality, fresh ingredients and other necessary supplies that meet our specifications from reliable suppliers. Our 24 independently owned and operated regional distribution centers purchase from various suppliers we carefully select based on quality and the suppliers’ understanding of our mission.  We work closely with our suppliers and seek to develop mutually beneficial long-term relationships with them. We use a mix of forward, fixed and formula pricing protocols, and our distribution centers purchase within the pricing guidelines and protocols we have established with the suppliers. We’ve also triedsought to increase, where practical, the number of suppliers for our ingredients which we believe canto help mitigate pricing volatility and supply shortages, andshortages. In addition, we followclosely monitor industry news, trade tariffs and other issues, weather, exchange rates, foreign demand, crises and other world

4


Table of Contents

events that may affect our ingredient prices. Certain key ingredients (including beef, pork, chicken, beans, rice, sour cream, cheese, and tortillas) are purchased from a small number of suppliers. For a discussion of risks related to our supply chain, see “Risks Related to Operating in the Restaurant Industry – Failure to receive frequent deliveries of higher-quality food ingredients and other supplies meeting our specifications could harm our operations” operations” and “Risks RelatedUnique to our UniqueOur Business Strategy Our Food With Integrity philosophy subjects us to risks” risks” in Item 1A. “Risk Factors.”   

Quality Assurance and Food Safety.We are committed to serving safe, high quality food. Our Executive Director of Food Safety, a respected expert in the industry, overseesfood safety and quality assurance teams work to ensure compliance with our food safety programs and practices, components of which include:

·

supplier interventions (steps to avoid food safety risks before ingredients reach Chipotle);

·

advanced technologytechnologies (tools that eliminate pathogens while maintaining food quality);

farmer·

small grower support and training;

4


Table of Contents

·

enhanced restaurant procedures (protocols for handling ingredients and sanitizing surfaces in our restaurants);

·

food safety certification;certifications;

·

internal and third partythird-party restaurant inspections; and

·

ingredient traceability.



These and other food safety practices underscore our commitment to becomingbeing a leader in food safety while we continuecontinuing to serve high quality food that our customersguests love. Our Executive Director of Food Safety directs afood safety and quality assurance department that establishesteams establish and monitorsmonitor our quality and food safety programs and workswork closely with our suppliers to ensure our high standards are met throughout the supply chain. We maintain a limited list of approved suppliers, many of whichwhom are among the top suppliers in the industry. In addition, we have a team approach where our training, operations, legal and risk management departments develop and implement operating standards for food quality, preparation, cleanliness, employee health protocols, and safety in the restaurants. Our food safety programs are also intended to ensure that we not only continue to comply with applicable federal, state and local food safety regulations, but also establish Chipotle as an industry leader in food safety.

To be sure that our food safety programs continue to evolve in ways that will help maintain leadership inachieve this important area,goal, we have a Food Safety Advisory Council comprised of some of the nation’s foremost food safety authorities. The Food Safety Advisory Council is charged with evaluating our programs, both in practice and implementation, and advising us on ways to elevate our already high standards for food safety.

DeliveringGuest Experience and Operations

Serving great food, with great service in a safe, quick, clean and happy environment is always our highest priority, and we take pride in making the Chipotle experience exceptional. We invest in training to consistently deliver an Excellent Guest Experience

We believe there is nothing more important than treatingoutstanding guest experience, and in our guestsfacilities to an excellent experience every time they visit oneimprove the appearance of our restaurants and expect that doing so will help us attract customers more frequentlymodernize tools. These investments enable faster throughput, better efficiency and engender greater customer loyalty. We have also renewed our commitment to focusing on our restaurant operations and training to elevate thea better team member experience we are providing, and ensuring greater consistency throughout all ofin our restaurants. CreatingIn 2018, we hired a Chief People Officer to support our approximately 73,000 team members. We believe creating an excellent guest experience starts with hiring great people and creating great teams, and training them on our high standards. We have re-tooled our restaurant compensation systems to place greater emphasis on the strength of operations and the guest experience, and revamped our training programs to better support these priorities.teams.

Restaurant Team. Each restaurant typically has a general manager or Restaurateur (a high-performing general manager), an apprentice manager (in a majority of our restaurants), and we aim to have two or three hourly service managers, one or two hourly kitchen managers and an average of 22 full and part-time crew members, though our busier restaurants tend to have slightly more employees. We generally have two shifts at our restaurants, which simplifies scheduling and provides stability for our employees. We also cross-train our peopleteam members so that each can work a variety of stations, allowing us to work efficiently during our busiest times, while giving our peopleemployees the opportunity to develop a wider array of skills. Consistent with our emphasis on customer service, we encourage our general managers and crew members to welcome and interact with customersguests throughout the day. In addition to the employees serving our customersguests at each restaurant, we also have a field support system that includes field leaders and team directors, as well as executive team directors who report to our Chief Restaurant Officer.

Innovation.  We are prioritizing the development of technological and other innovations, such as digital/mobile ordering platforms, anddigital order pick-up shelves, digital order pick-up lanes we call “Chipotlanes”, delivery and catering, choices, that allow our guests to engage with us in whatever fashion is most convenient for them. By allowing our customersguests to order and receive their food in a variety of ways, we believe we can attract more customersguests and encourage customersthem to choose us more frequently. In order to successfully deliver a great experience for more customers,guests, we are

5


Table of Contents

emphasizing the optimization of second make lines and expanding the ability to pay using Apple Pay or Android Pay.Pay for digital/mobile orders. These initiatives allow us to fulfill catering or onlinedigital/mobile orders without disrupting throughput on our main service line.  In fact, technological innovations can enhance the experience of other guests by helping to improve throughput for those who choose to dine in our restaurants.  Recent digital ordering innovations have allowed us to increase digital order volumes to the highest levels we’ve ever achieved, and we believe continued improvements in these areas will allow us to achieve even betterfurther improve these results. Additionally, we have enhanced our data capabilities to allow us to better identify individual customersguests and their unique frequency patterns, and to target our marketing and promotional efforts at the individual level. We believe the advancements we have made in this area will help us as we continue to target lapsed customers, and seek to build frequency among newer customers.make it as convenient as possible for our guests to enjoy Chipotle when and how they like it. We are also testing new menu items. We have built a stage-gate process around innovation where we test, learn and iterate, so that when we roll out a new initiative, we are highly confident in the probability of success.

Marketing

Our marketing program is divided into three categories: top-of-mind advertising, brand advertising and local marketing. Each of these servesphilosophy shifted from a different purpose, but together they are intendedmore promotionally driven, decentralized approach in 2017 to differentiate us from the competition. Top-of-mind advertising is intendeda more centrally driven model designed to keep currentgenerate higher consumer awareness and new customers comingdrive guests into our restaurants;restaurants in 2018. Our ultimate marketing mission is to make Chipotle not just a food brand advertisingbut a purpose driven lifestyle brand that is directed at existing customersmore visible, more engaging, and seeksmore relevant in culture. In October 2018, we launched the biggest quarterly brand campaign in our history with the “For Real” launch, reflecting our heritage and also reinforcing our differentiation of using responsibly sourced, real ingredients and real cooking techniques to build deeper connections to our brand;make flavorful food that consumers both love and local advertising aims to help connect our restaurants to local communities and the customers who live there.feel better about eating. 

Our top-of-mind advertising has generally included print, outdoor, social, digital and radio advertising, but we have also incorporated some

5


Table of Contents

We utilize multiple marketing channels, including national television, advertising. Beyond these traditional channels, wedigital marketing, social media, fundraising, events and sponsorships to reach consumers.

We have invested and will continue to pioneer new avenues of brand advertising aimed at makinginvest in extensive customer research that will give us insight into our consumers more curious about some of the issues that are importantin order to us,inform our business decisions, media, messaging, and explaining why and how we are working to drive positive change in the nation’s food supply. We also have a dedicated team of field marketing staff that helps connect our restaurants to local communities through fundraisers, sponsorships and participation in local events.

Alongside our restaurant teams, these efforts have helped us create considerable word-of-mouth publicity as our customers learn more about us and share with others. This approach allows us to build awareness and loyalty with relatively low advertising expenditures, even in a competitive category, and to differentiate Chipotle as a company that is committed to doing the right thing in every facet of our business.innovation pipeline. 

For a discussion of risks related to our marketing, see “Risks Related to Ourour Plans to ImproveGrow Our Sales and Profitability and Restore Our Economic Model – Our marketing and advertising strategies may not be successful, or may pose risks that could adversely impact our business” in Item 1A. “Risk Factors.”

Competition

The fast-casual, quick-service, and casual dining segments of the restaurant industry are highly competitive with respect to, among other things, taste, price, food quality and presentation, service, location, convenience, brand reputation, cleanliness, and the ambience and condition of each restaurant. Our competition includes a variety of restaurants in each of these segments, including locally-owned restaurants and national and regional chains. Many of our competitors offer dine-in, carry-out, online, catering, and delivery services. Among our main competitors are a number of multi-unit, multi-market Mexican food or burrito restaurant concepts, some of which are expanding nationally.  In recent years, competition has increased significantly from restaurant formats like ours that serve higher quality food, quickly and at a reasonable price.price.   

Moreover, we may also compete with companies outside the fast-casual, quick-service, and casual dining segments of the restaurant industry. For example, competitive pressures can come from deli sections and in-store cafés of major grocery store chains, including those targeted at customers who seek higher-quality food, as well as from convenience stores, cafeterias, and other dining outlets. Meal kit delivery companies and other eat-at-home options also present some degree of competition for our restaurants. 

We believe that this competitionCompetition has made it more challenging to maintain or increase the frequency of customer visits, but continue tohowever we believe that we can differentiate ourselves with our purpose to cultivate nourished communities where wholesome food is enjoyed every day.of cultivating a better world.  For more information, see “Risks Related to Operating in the Restaurant Industry—Competition could adversely affect us” in Item 1A. “Risk Factors.Factors.”  We also compete with other restaurants and retail establishments for site locations and restaurant employees.

Restaurant Site Selection 

We believe restaurant site selection is critical to our long-term success and growth strategy and thusstrategy. As a result, we devote substantial time and effort to evaluatingcarefully evaluate each potential restaurant location. Our site selection process is led by our internal team of real estate managers and also includes the use of external real estate brokers with expertise in specific markets, as well as support from an internal real estate strategy and research group. We studythoroughly assess the surrounding trade area, demographic and business information within that area, and

6


Table of Contents

available information on competitors and other restaurants. Based on this analysis, including utilization of predictive modeling using proprietary formulas, we determine projected sales and targeted return on investment for each potential restaurant site. We have been successful in a number of different types of locations, such as in-linein-line or end-cap locations in strip or power centers, in regional malls and downtown business districts, free-standing buildings, food courts, outlet centers, airports, military bases and train stations. 

For a discussion of risks related to our opening of new restaurants and expansion into new real estate types, see “Risks Related to Ourour Plans to ImproveGrow Our Sales and Profitability and Restore Our Economic ModelOur new restaurants, once opened, may not be profitable, and may adversely impact the sales of our existing restaurants” in Item 1A. “Risk Factors.”

Other Restaurant Concepts

WeAlthough in 2019 our focus will remain on thoughtfully growing the Chipotle brand, we believe that the fundamental principles on which our restaurants are based – finding better ingredients, preparing them using classic techniques in front of the customer,our guests, and serving them in an interactive format with great teams dedicated to providing an excellent dining experience – can be adapted to cuisines other than the food served at Chipotle. Over the previous six years, we’ve explored this idea by investingWe have invested in innovative concepts such as Pizzeria Locale, a fast-casual pizza restaurant that now has seventwo restaurants in four states,Denver, Colorado. For a discussion of risks related to Pizzeria Locale and Tasty Made, a burgerour possible investment in new concepts, see “Risks Unique to Our Business Strategy – Pizzeria Locale and other new restaurant we openedconcepts may not contribute to our growth  in Lancaster, Ohio. We also previously operated ShopHouse Southeast Asian Kitchen restaurants, but closed all of the ShopHouse locations in early 2017.  In 2018, our focus will remain on thoughtfully growing the Chipotle brand. Item 1A. “Risk Factors.” 

Information Systems and Cyber Security

We use a variety of applications and systems to securely manage the flow of information within each of our restaurants and within our centralized corporate infrastructure. The services available within our systems and applications include restaurant operations, supply chain, inventory, scheduling, training, human capital management, financial tools, and data protection services. The restaurant structure is based primarily on a point-of-sale system that operates locally at the restaurant and is integrated with other functions necessary to restaurant operations. It records sales transactions, receives out of store orders, and authorizes, batches, and transmits credit card transactions. The system also allows employees to enter time clock information and to produce a variety ofmanagement reports. Select information that is captured from this system at each restaurant is collected in the central corporate infrastructure, which enables management to continually monitor operating results.  Our digital ordering system allows guests to place orders online or through our mobile app. Orders taken remotely are routed to the point-of-sales system based on the timeapp and enables a delivery by a third party service with which we

6


Table of customer order pickup.Contents

have entered into a delivery agreement. We also continue to modernize and make investments in our information technology networks and infrastructure, specifically in our physical and technological security measures to anticipate cyber-attacks and preventin order to combat breaches, and toas well as provide improved control, security and scalability. Enhancing the security of our financial data, customer information and other personal information remains a priority for us. 

In April 2017, our information security team detected unauthorized activity on the network that supports payment processing for our restaurants, and immediately began an investigation with the help of leading computer security firms. The investigation detected malware designed to access payment card data from payment cards used at the point-of-sale system at most of our restaurants. The malware searched for track data, which may include cardholder name, card number, expiration date, and internal verification codes; however, no other customer information was affected. We removed the malware from our systems and have been working to further enhance the security of our payment card network.

See “General Business RisksWe may be harmed by security risks we face in connection with our electronic processing and transmission of confidential customerguest and employee information” in Item 1A. “Risk Factors,” as well as Note 10.13. “Commitments and Contingencies” in Item 8. “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data,” for further discussion of the payment card security incident in 2017, related legal proceedings, and other risks associated with our information systems.

Government Regulation and Environmental Matters

We are subject to various federal, state and local laws and regulations governing our relationship with and other matters pertaining to our employees, including wage and hour laws, requirements to provide meal and rest periods or other benefits, family leave mandates, requirements regarding working conditions and accommodations to certain employees, citizenship or work authorization and related requirements, insurance and workers’ compensation rules, healthcare laws, scheduling notification requirements and anti-discrimination and anti-harassment laws.

We are required to collect and maintain personal information about our employees, and we collect information about guests as part of some of our marketing programs as well. The collection and use of such information is regulated at the federal and state levels, and by the European Union and its member states, and the regulatory environment related to information security and privacy is evolving and increasingly demanding.

We are subject to the ADA and similar state laws that give civil rights protections to individuals with disabilities in the context of employment, public accommodations and other areas.

In recent years, there has been an increased legislative, regulatory and consumer focus at the federal, state and municipal levels on the food industry including nutrition and advertising practices.

Each of our restaurants is also subject to state and local licensing and regulation by health, alcoholic beverage, sanitation, food and workplace safety and other agencies.

We are subject to federal, state and local environmental laws and regulations concerning the discharge, storage, handling, release and disposal of hazardous or toxic substances, as well as local ordinances restricting the use of straws, utensils, and the types of packaging we can use in our restaurants.

We offer eligible full-time and part-time U.S. employees the opportunity to enroll in healthcare coverage subsidized by us. For various reasons, many of our eligible employees currently choose not to participate in our healthcare plans. Under the comprehensive U.S. health care reform law enacted in 2010, the Affordable Care Act, employers can be subjected to penalties for failure to provide a healthcare plan which is deemed to be both “affordable” and offers minimal essential coverage.

Employees

As of December 31, 2017,2018, we had about 68,89073,000 employees, including about 5,0205,100 salaried employees and about 63,87067,900 hourly employees. None of our employees are unionized or covered by a collective bargaining agreement.

Seasonality

Seasonal factors influencing our business are described under the heading “Quarterly Financial Data/Seasonality” in Item 7. “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.”

7


Table of Contents

Our Intellectual Property and Trademarks

“Chipotle,” “Chipotle Mexican Grill,” “Food With Integrity,” “Responsibly Raised,” and a number of other marks and related designs and logos are U.S. registered trademarks of Chipotle. We have filed trademark applications for a number of additional marks in the U.S. as well. In addition to our U.S. registrations, we have registered trademarks for “Chipotle” and a number of other marks in Canada, the European Union and various other countries, and have filed trademark applications for “Chipotle Mexican Grill,” “Chipotle” and a number of other marks in additional countries. We also believe that the design of our restaurants is our proprietary trade dress and have registered elements of our restaurant design for trade dress protection in the U.S. as well.

7


Table of Contents

From time to time we have taken action against other restaurants that we believe are misappropriating our trademarks, restaurant designs or advertising. Although our policy is to protect and defend vigorously our rights to our intellectual property, we may not be able to adequately protect our intellectual property, which could harm the value of our brand and adversely affect our business.

Available Information

We maintain a website at www.chipotle.com, including an investor relations section at ir.chipotle.com in which we routinely post important information, such as webcasts of quarterly earnings calls and other investor events in which we participate or host, and any related materials.  Our Code of Conduct is also available in this section of our website.  You may access our annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K and amendments to those reports, as well as other reports relating to us that are filed with or furnished to the SEC, free of charge in the investor relations section of our website as soon as reasonably practicable after such material is electronically filed with or furnished to the SEC.  The public may also read and copy materials we file with the SEC at the SEC’s Public Reference Room, which is located at 100 F Street, NE, Washington, DC 20549. You can obtain information on the operation of the Public Reference Room by calling the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330. The SEC also maintains a website that contains reports, proxy and information statements and other information regarding issuers that file electronically with the SEC at www.sec.gov.

The contents of the websites mentioned above are not incorporated into and should not be considered a part of this report. The references to the URLs for these websites are intended to be inactive textual references only.

8


 

Table of Contents

 

ITEM 1A.  RISK FACTORS

RISK FACTORS

The following risk factors could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations, and should be carefully considered in evaluating our business or making an investment decision involving our common stock. The risks and uncertainties described below are those that we have identified as material, but are not the only risks and uncertainties we face. Our business is also subject to general risks and uncertainties that affect many other companies, including, but not limited to, overall economic and industry conditions. Additional risks and uncertainties not currently known to us or that we currently believe are not material also may materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.operations.

Risks Related to our Plans to ImproveGrow Our Sales and Improve Profitability and Restore our Economic Model

Our average restaurant sales and profitability will continuegrowth depends on our ability to fall short of our past results unless we can significantly increase comparable restaurant sales, and there are material risks to our ability to do so.

In 2016 we experienced lower total company sales than the preceding year for the first time in our history as a public company, and our average restaurant volumes declined from $2.532 million as of September 30, 2015 to $1.940 million as of December 31, 2017.  To buildgrow our average restaurant sales, we will need to increase comparable restaurant sales, which represent the change in period-over-period sales for restaurants beginning in their 13th full calendar month of operation. Changes in comparable restaurant sales are a critical factor affecting our profitability, because the profit margin on incremental comparable restaurant sales is generally higher due to the sales increases being applied against a partially fixed cost base. Conversely, declines in comparable restaurant sales, as we have seen in some periods over the past twothree years, have a significant adverse effect on profitability due to the loss of the positive impact on profit margins associated with comparable restaurant sales increases, while we continue to incur a certain level of fixed costs.

Our ability to increase comparable restaurant sales depends on many factors, including:

·

perceptions of the Chipotle brand and the safety and quality of our food, which may continue to be adversely impacted by actual or rumored food safety incidents or other adverse publicity, including as described below under “—We may continue to be negatively impacted by food safety incidents associated with our restaurants…”incidents…;

·

competition, especially from an increasing number of competitors in the fast casualfast-casual segment of the restaurant industry and from other restaurant concepts whose strategies overlap with elements of our Food With Integrity philosophy, as well as from grocery stores, meal kit delivery services and other dining options;

·

our ability to increase menu prices without adversely impacting transaction counts to such a degree that the impact from lower transactions equals or exceeds the benefit of the menu price increase, and without “trade down” by customersguests or other reductions in average check in response to such price increases;

·

executing our strategies effectively, including our marketing and branding strategies, our initiatives to expand the use of onlinemobile and other digital ordering and increase sales from our delivery orders and catering options, our efforts to improve the overall quality of our customers’guests’ experience and increase the speed at which our crews serve each customer,guest, and our potential introduction of new menu items, each of which we may not be able to accomplish or which may not have the impact we expect;

·

changes in consumer preferences and discretionary spending, including weaker consumer spending during periods of economic difficulty or uncertainty;

·

initial sales performance of new restaurants, and the impact of new Chipotle restaurants in the event customersguests who frequent one of our restaurants begin to visit one of our new restaurants instead, as further described below under “—Our new restaurants, once opened, may not be profitable…”;

·

weather, natural disasters and other factors limiting access to our restaurants; and

·

changes in government regulation that may impact customerconsumer perceptions of our food, including initiatives regarding menu labeling and marketing claims about the origin or makeup of some of the ingredients we serve.



These factors, most of which are described in more detail in additional Risk Factorsrisk factors below, are beyond our control to at least some degree. As a result, it is possible that we will experience future declines in comparable restaurant sales or that we otherwise will not achieve our targeted or expected comparable restaurant sales.sales in the future, or may even experience declines in comparable restaurant sales in the future.  Any future declines in comparable restaurant sales or failure to meet

9


Table of Contents

market expectations for comparable restaurant sales increases would likely result in a significant adverse impact on the price of our common stock.

Increasing our sales and profits depends in part on our ability to open new restaurants in sites and on terms attractive to us, which is subject to many unpredictable factors, and we plan to open fewer restaurants in 20182019 than we have in many prior years, which will adversely impact our sales growth.growth rate.

We had 2,4082,491 restaurants in operation as of December 31, 2017,2018, and we plan to increase the number of our restaurants significantly. In 20182019 we plan to open between 130140 and 150155 new restaurants, significantlywhich is fewer than the number of restaurants opened per

9


Table of Contents

year in many prior years. We have in the past experienced delays in opening some restaurants and that could happen again as a result of any one or more of the following factors:

 

·

our potential inability to locate and secure new restaurant sites in locations that we believe to be attractive;

·

obstacles to hiring and training top performing employees in the local market;

·

difficulty managing construction and development costs of new restaurants, particularly in competitive markets or when real estate development activity is robust;

·

delay or cancellation of new site development by developers and landlords, which may become increasingly common during periods of economic uncertainty, tight credit, and/or rising interest rates;

·

any shortages of construction labor or materials;

·

difficulty ramping up the growth of our international business or new restaurant concepts, including for the reasons described below under “—Our expansion into international marketshas been limited, and may present increased risks …” and “—Risks Unique to our Business Strategy—Pizzeria Locale Tasty Made and other new restaurant concepts may not contribute to our growth”;

·

difficulty negotiating leases with acceptable terms;

any shortages of construction labor or materials;·

failures or delays in securing required governmental approvals (including construction, parking and other permits);

·

lack of availability of, or inability to obtain, adequate supplies of ingredients that meet our quality standards; and

·

the impact of inclement weather, natural disasters and other calamities.



One of our biggest challenges in opening new restaurants is staffing and training new restaurant teams. We seek to hire only top performing employees, train them extensively in order to help ensure we provide an outstanding customerguest experience, and promote many general managers from our crew, all of which may make it more difficult for us to staff all the restaurants we intend to open. Constraints on our hiring new employees are described further below under “—Risks Related to Operating in the Restaurant IndustryIndustry—Our business could be adversely affected by increased labor costs…costs

Another significant challenge is locating and securing an adequate supply of suitable new restaurant sites. Competition for restaurant sites in our target markets can be intense, and development and leasing costs are increasing, particularly for urban locations. These factors could negatively impact our ability to manage our occupancy costs, which may adversely impact our profitability.  In addition, any of these factors may be exacerbated by economic factors, which may result in developers and contractors seeing increased demand and therefore driving up our construction and leasing costs up. 

If we are unable to open the number of new restaurants we plan, or if we decide to continue opening fewer new restaurants than we have in past years or delay or forego a significant number of planned restaurant openings, including due to any of the reasons set forth above, this could materially and adversely affect our growth strategy and our expected results.costs. Moreover, as we open and operate more restaurants, our rate of expansion relative to the size of our existing restaurant base will decline, making it increasingly difficult to achieve levels of sales and profitability growth that we achieved prior to 2016.  We expect this effect to be more pronounced through at least 2018,2019, given our plan to decrease the number of new restaurants we open during the year as compared to years past.the number of restaurants opened per year in many past years.

Our progress in opening new restaurants from quarter to quarter may also occur at an uneven rate, which may result in quarterly sales and profit growth falling short of market expectations in some periods.

10


TableIf we are unable to open the number of Contentsnew restaurants we plan to open, or if we decide to continue opening fewer new restaurants than we have in past years or delay or forego a significant number of planned restaurant openings, including due to any of the reasons set forth above, this would adversely affect our growth.  Any resulting decrease in our sales growth rate or investor expectations for our future growth may result in declines in the price of our common stock.

Our new restaurants, once opened, may not be profitable, and may adversely impact the sales of our existing restaurants.

Historically, many of our new restaurants have opened with an initial ramp-up period typically lasting 24 months or more, during which they generate sales and income below the levels at which we expect them to normalize after the restaurant has built a customer base, and during which costs may be higher as we train new employees and adjust our food deliveries and preparation to sales volumes and peak-hour trends. If we are unable to build the customer base that we expect for new restaurant locations or overcome the higher fixed costs associated with new restaurant locations, new restaurants may not have results similar to those of our existing restaurants and may not be profitable.  Our new restaurant sales volumes since the fourth quarter of 2015 have also been negatively impacted by the food safety issues described elsewhere in this report and other adverse publicity, and as a result, the initial negative effect of new restaurants on our average restaurant sales over the past two years has been of greater magnitude than we have seen in the past.  This trend may continue into 20182019 and beyond.

10


Table of Contents

We have also opened restaurants in nearly all major metropolitan areas across the U.S. New restaurants that we have recently opened, or may open, in existing markets may adversely impact sales in previously-opened restaurants in the same market, as customersguests who frequent our established restaurants begin to visit a newly-opened restaurant instead. This impact could worsen as we open additional restaurants, and could make it more difficult for us to increase comparable restaurant sales and profitability. ExistingAlternatively, existing restaurants could also make it more difficult to build the customer base for newly-opened restaurants in the same market, and could limit our growth potential if we determine that one or more of our nearby restaurants makes an otherwise viable new restaurant site unattractive to us.

In addition, in the event we are not able to contain increases in our average restaurant development costs, which could result from inflation, an increase in the proportion of higher cost locations, project mismanagement or other reasons, our new restaurant locations could also result in lower returns on our investment in such new restaurants.

Finally, our new restaurant development activity has broadened recently to incorporate trade areas or types of restaurant sites in which we have little or no prior experience, including smaller or more economically mixed communities, highway sites, outlet centers, and restaurants in airports, food courts, or on military sites.  These types of sites may become more important to our restaurant growth strategy as we find fewer opportunities to open in traditional sites, given our past growth.  Many of these site types may involve additional costs that we do not incur in our more traditional restaurant sites such as security costs, or marketing costs, which will adversely impact the profitability of restaurants in these types of sites. The risks related to building a customer base and managing development and operating costs in some or all of these types of trade areas or restaurant sites may also be more significant than in our traditional sites, which could result in unexpected negative impacts on our new restaurant operating results.

Our marketing and advertising strategies may not be successful, or may pose risks that could adversely impact our business.

In 2018, we hired a new Chief Marketing Officer and other senior marketing staff and introduced a new advertising campaign and media strategies, including increased use of television advertising.  We intend to continue to invest in marketing and advertising strategies that we believe will attract guests or increase their connection with our brand. If these investments do not drive increased restaurant sales, the expense associated with these programs will adversely impact our financial results, and we may not generate the levels of comparable restaurant sales we expect. Additionally, if our marketing and advertising strategies are not successful, we may be forced to engage in additional promotional activities to attract and retain guests, including buy-one get-one offers and other offers for free or discounted food, and any such additional promotional activities could adversely impact our profitability.

We also plan to continue to emphasize strategies such as mobile and other digital ordering, delivery orders, and catering offerings in an effort to increase overall sales. These efforts may not succeed to the degree we expect, or may result in unexpected operational challenges that adversely impact our costs or our brand reputation. We may also seek to introduce new menu items that may not generate the sales we expect. 

In addition, some of our marketing has incorporated elements intended to encourage guests to question sources or production methods commonly used to produce food. These elements of our marketing could alienate food suppliers and other food industry groups and may potentially lead to an increased risk of disputes or litigation if suppliers or other constituencies believe our marketing is unfair or misleading. Increased costs in connection with any such issues, or any deterioration in our relationships with existing suppliers, could adversely impact us or our reputation. Furthermore, if these messages do not resonate with our guests or potential guests, the value of our brand may be eroded.

We may continue to be negatively impacted by food safety incidents, and further instances of food-borne or localized illnesses associated with our restaurants would result in increased negative publicity and further adverse impacts on customerconsumer perceptions of our brand.

During late October and early November 2015, illnesses caused by E. coli bacteria were connected to a number of our restaurants, initially in Washington and Oregon, and subsequently to small numbers of our restaurants in as many as 12 other states. During the week of December 7, 2015, an unrelated incident involving norovirus was reported at a Chipotle restaurant in Brighton, Massachusetts, which worsened the adverse financial and operating impacts we experienced from the E. coli incident.  As a result of these incidents and related publicity, our sales and profitability were severely impacted throughout 2016.  In July 2017, cases of norovirus associated with a Chipotle restaurant in Sterling, Virginia had a further adverse impact on our sales, particularly throughout the mid-Atlantic and Northeast regions.regions, and in August 2018, illnesses believed to be caused by c. perfringens bacteria from the food in one of our restaurants in Powell, Ohio also negatively impacted our sales.  The significant amount of media coverage regarding these incidents, as well as the impact of social media (which was not in existence during many past food safety incidents involving other restaurant chains) in increasing, increased the awareness of these incidents may continue toand negatively impact customerimpacted perceptions of our restaurants and brand, notwithstanding the high volume of food-borne illness cases from other sources across the country every day. As a result our sales may not return to levels we were achieving prior to late 2015.

11


 

Table of Contents

 

Because of customerconsumer perceptions in the wake of these food safety incidents, any future occurrence of food-borne illness associated with our restaurants—even incidents that may be considered minor at other restaurants—would likelymay have an even more significant negative impact on our sales and our ability to regain customers.guests.  Although we have followed industry standard food safety protocols in the past and over the past two years have enhancedendeavored to continually enhance our food safety procedures to ensure that our food is as safe as it can possibly be, we may still be at a higher risk for food-borne illness occurrences than some competitors due to our greater use of fresh, unprocessed produce and meats, our reliance on employees cooking with traditional methods rather than automation, and our avoidingavoidance of frozen ingredients. Additionally, no food safety protocols can completely eliminate the risk of food-borne illness in any restaurant, including as a result of possible failures by suppliersrestaurant personnel or restaurant personnelsuppliers to follow food safety policies and procedures.  As a result, our enhanced food safety protocols may not be successful in preventing illness incidents in the future.  The risk of illnesses associated with our food might also increase in connection with an expansion of our delivery or catering businessbusinesses or other situations in which our food is transported and/or served in conditions we cannot control.  Furthermore, we have seen instances of unsubstantiated reports linking illnesses to Chipotle, and these reports have negatively impacted us.  Even if food-borne illnesses are attributed to us erroneously or arise from conditions outside of our control, the negative impact, both financially and otherwise, from any such illnesses is likely to be significant.  All of these factors could have a furtheran adverse impact on our ability to attract and retain customers.guests, which would in turn have a material adverse effect on our growth and profitability.

Our marketingability to continue to expand our digital business, delivery orders and advertising strategiescatering is uncertain, and these new business lines are subject to risks.

For the year ended December 31, 2018, 10.9% of our revenue was derived from digital orders, which was up significantly from prior years, and during 2018 the percentage of revenue derived from digital orders grew from 8.9% in the first quarter to 12.9% in the fourth quarter.  This growth rate may not be successful,sustainable for even the short term, and if our digital business does not continue to expand it may be difficult for us to achieve our planned sales growth.  We have also increased our efforts to promote delivery orders, which have also grown considerably.  We rely on third party providers to fulfill delivery orders, and the ordering and payment platforms used by these third parties, or our mobile app or online ordering system, could be damaged or interrupted by technological failures, user errors, cyber-attacks or other factors, which may pose risks that could adversely impact our business.

In 2017, we hired a new advertising agencysales through these channels and media buyer, introduced a new advertising campaigncould negatively impact our brand. Additionally, our delivery partners are responsible for order fulfillment and media strategies, including television advertising, and introduced queso,may make errors or fail to make timely deliveries, leading to customer disappointment that may negatively impact our first significant new menu item inbrand. We also incur additional costs associated with using third party service providers to fulfil these digital orders.  Moreover, the third party restaurant delivery business is intensely competitive, with a number of years.players competing for market share, online traffic, capital, and delivery drivers and other people resources.  The third party delivery services with which we work may struggle to compete effectively, and if they were to cease or curtail operations or fail to provide timely delivery services in a cost-effective manner, or if they give greater priority on their platforms to our competitors, our delivery business may be negatively impacted. We will continue to invest in marketinghave also introduced catering offerings on both a pick-up and advertising strategies that we believe will attractdelivery basis, and customers or increasemay choose our competitors’ catering offerings over ours, be disappointed with their connectionexperience with our brand. If these investmentscatering, or experience food safety problems if they do not drive increased restaurant sales,serve our food in a safe manner, which may negatively impact us. Such delivery and catering offerings also increase the expenserisk of illnesses associated with our food because the food is transported and/or served by third parties in conditions we cannot control.

Because all of these programs will adversely impact our financial results,offerings are relatively new, it is difficult for us to anticipate the level of sales they may generate.  That may result in operational challenges, both in fulfilling orders made through these channels and we may not generate the levels of comparable restaurant sales we expect. Additionally, if our marketing and advertising strategies are not successful, we may be forced to engage in additional promotional activities to attract and retain customers, including buy-one get-one offers and other offers for free or discounted food, and any such promotional activities could adversely impact our profitability.

We also plan to continue to emphasize strategies such as remote ordering, new catering options, and delivery in an effort to increase overall sales. These efforts may not increase our sales to the degree we expect, or at all. We may also seek to introduce new menu items that may not generate the sales we expect.  Catering and other out-of-restaurant sales options, or new menu items, may also introduce new operating procedures to our restaurants andas we balance fulfillment of these orders with service of our traditional in-restaurant guests as well.  Any such operational challenges may not successfully execute these procedures, which could adverselynegatively impact the customer experience inassociated with our restaurants and thereby harmdigital, delivery or catering orders, the guest experience for our traditional in-restaurant business, or both.  These factors may adversely impact our sales and customer perceptions of our brand.

In addition, some of our marketing has incorporated elements intended to encourage customers to question sources or production methods commonly used to produce food. These elements of our marketing could alienate food suppliers and other food industry groups and may potentially lead to an increased risk of disputes or litigation if suppliers or other constituencies believe our marketing is unfair or misleading. Increased costs in connection with any such issues, or any deterioration in our relationships with existing suppliers, could adversely impact us or our reputation. Furthermore, if these messages do not resonate with our customers or potential customers, the value of our brand may be eroded.reputation.

Our expansion into international markets has been limited, and may present increased risks due to lower customer awareness of our brand, our unfamiliarity with those markets and other factors.

As of December 31, 2017,2018, 37 of our restaurants were located outside of the U.S., with 2423 in Canada, sixseven in the United Kingdom, six in France and one in Frankfurt, Germany. Our focus for the present time remains on expanding in North America, which limits our near-term growth potential.

12


Table of Contents

As a result of our small number of restaurants outside the U.S. and the relatively short time we have been operating those restaurants, we have lower brand awareness and less operating experience in these international markets, and our average restaurant sales and/or transaction counts may be lower in these international markets than in the U.S. The markets in which we’ve opened restaurants outside the U.S., and any additional new markets we enter outside the U.S. in the future, have different competitive conditions, consumer tastes and discretionary spending patterns than our U.S. markets. As a result, new restaurants outside the U.S. may be less successful than restaurants in our existing U.S. markets. Specifically, due to lower consumer familiarity with the Chipotle brand, differences in customerconsumer tastes or spending patterns, or for other reasons, sales at restaurants opened outside the U.S. may take longer to ramp up and reach expected sales and profit levels, and may never do so, thereby affecting our overall growth and profitability. To build brand awareness in international markets, we may need to make greater investments in advertising and promotional activity than we originally planned or than we need to for a new restaurant in a U.S. market, which could negatively impact the profitability of our operations in those international markets. 

We may also find it more difficult in international markets to hire, train and keep top performing employees who can successfully deliver excellent customerguest experiences, and labor costs may be higher in international markets due to increased

12


Table of Contents

regulation, higher employment taxes or social benefit costs or local market conditions. In addition, restaurants outside the U.S. have had higher construction, occupancy and food costs than restaurantsthose in existing markets,the U.S., and we may have difficulty finding reliable suppliers or distributors or ones that can provide us, either initially or over time, with adequate supplies of ingredients meeting our quality standards. Additional costs or difficulties from any of the foregoing factors may adversely impact the operating results of our international markets. Markets outside the U.S. may also have regulatory differences with the U.S. with which we are not familiar, or that subject us to significant additional expense or to which we are not able to successfully adapt, which may have a particularly adverse impact on our sales or profitability in those markets and could adversely impact our overall results. For example, a new privacy regulation in the European Union called the General Data Protection Regulation, or GDPR, is scheduled to becomebecame effective in May 2018 and requires companies to meet new requirements regarding the handling of personal data, and failure to meet GDPR requirements could result in penalties of up to 4% of our worldwide revenue.revenue of the prior financial year. Our overall results may also be negatively affected by currency risk on the transactions in other currencies and translation adjustments resulting from the conversion of our international financial results into the U.S. dollar.

Pizzeria Locale, Tasty Made and other new restaurant concepts may not contribute to our growth.

We believe that the fundamental principles on which our restaurants are based – finding better ingredients, preparing them using classic techniques in front of the customer, and serving them in an interactive format with great teams dedicated to providing an excellent dining experience – can be adapted to cuisines other than the food served at Chipotle. In order to see how our model works when we use different ingredients and a different style of food, we opened a number of ShopHouse Southeast Asian Kitchen restaurants beginning in 2011, and one Tasty Made burger restaurant in Ohio in 2016. We enlisted an equity partner to help us refine the Tasty Made brand in 2017.  We also have a majority ownership interest in a company operating seven fast casual Pizzeria Locale restaurants in Denver, Colorado, Kansas City, Missouri and Cincinnati, Ohio, and we plan to assist with the further expansion of Pizzeria Locale in the future. ShopHouse was not able to achieve a level of sales and profitability that made it attractive to us for future investment, and we recognized a $14.5 million non-cash impairment charge, representing substantially all of the value of long-lived assets of ShopHouse, during the year ended December 31, 2016, and closed all of the ShopHouse locations in the first half of 2017. Furthermore, Pizzeria Locale and Tasty Made are new brands and have lower brand awareness, lower sales and less operating experience than most Chipotle restaurants, and may also not achieve restaurant economics that make them attractive for further investment in the future.  These concepts also operate in markets in which there are numerous competitors, including a number of large and well-known brands, and a number of other companies or individuals in the restaurant industry have recently opened or invested in fast-casual pizza concepts or so-called “better burger” restaurants.

Notwithstanding our growth plans for Tasty Made, our investment in Pizzeria Locale, and exploration of other restaurant brand opportunities, our immediate focus will remain on thoughtfully growing the Chipotle brand. As a result, we do not expect Pizzeria Locale, Tasty Made or other concepts to contribute to our growth in a meaningful way for at least the next several years.  We may also determine not to move forward with any further expansion of Tasty Made or Pizzeria Locale. These decisions would each limit our overall growth potential over the long term as well. Additionally, the expansion of Tasty Made or Pizzeria Locale or investments in other restaurant concepts each might distract our management, which could have an adverse impact on our core Chipotle business.

Our failure to manage our restaurant growth and transformation effectively could harm our business and operating results.

As described elsewhere in this report, our plans call for a significant number of new restaurants.restaurants, new employees, new suppliers, and new systems to support our business strategies. Our existing restaurant management systems, financial and management controls, information systems and personnel may be inadequate to support our expansion, and managing our growth effectively will require us to continue to enhance these systems, procedures and controls, as well as to hire, train and retain general managers, crew and corporate staff. We also are continuing to attempt to improve our field management in an effort to improve restaurant operations, including food safety, and develop additional top performing general managers more quickly. We may not respond quickly enough to the changing demands that our restaurant growth imposesand transformation impose on management, crew and existing infrastructure, and changes to our operating structure may result in increased costs or inefficiencies that we cannot currently anticipate. We have also historically placed a great deal of importance on restaurant cultures, which we believe needs to be redirected to focus more on effective training of our team to deliver excellent customer experiences. As we grow our number of restaurants, additional shifts in our cultural or operational focus may harm morale in our restaurants or prove distracting to our restaurant employees, which could adversely impact our business and operating results.

Risks Related to Operating in the Restaurant Industry

Competition could adversely affect us.

The fast-casual, quick-service and casual dining segments of the restaurant industry are highly competitive with respect to, among other things, taste, price, food quality and presentation, service, location, brand reputation, and the ambience and condition of each restaurant. Our competition includes a variety of restaurants in each of these segments, including locally-owned restaurants and

13


Table of Contents

national and regional chains. Many of our competitors offer dine-in, carry-out, online, catering and delivery services. Among our main competitors are a number of multi-unit, multi-market Mexican food or burrito restaurant concepts, some of which are expanding nationally. In recent years, competition has also increased significantly from restaurant formats like ours that serve higher quality food quickly and at a reasonable price.

Moreover, we may also compete with companies outside the fast casual and quick service and casual dining segments of the restaurant industry. For example, competitive pressures can come from deli sections and in-store cafés of several major grocery store chains, including those targeted at customersconsumers who want higher-quality food, as well as from convenience stores, cafeterias and other dining outlets. Meal kit delivery companies and other eat-at-home options also present some degree of competition for our restaurants.  In addition, our strategy includes opening additional restaurants in existing markets, and as we do so sales may decline in our previously-opened restaurants as customersguests who frequent our established restaurants begin to visit a newly-opened restaurant instead.

13


Table of Contents

We believe that competition from all of the foregoing has made it more challenging to maintain or increase the frequency of our customerguest visits, and that those competitive pressures will continue or increase in the future.

Many of our competitors have existed longer than we have and may have a more established market presence with substantially greater financial, marketing, personnel and other resources than we have. These and other competitors may attract customersguests with, among other things, a more diverse menu, lower operating costs and prices, better locations, better facilities, better management, more effective marketing and more efficient operations than we have.  

Additionally, although we continue to believe that Chipotle can differentiate itself with our commitment to higher-quality and responsibly-sourced ingredients, competitors have increasingly made claims related to the quality of their ingredients, or distinctions between artificial and natural flavors, colors and preservatives.  The increasing use of these claims in the marketplace, even if the substantive basis for some of them may be questionable, may lessen our differentiation and make it more difficult for us to compete. Some of these competitors and other fast casual concepts have sought to duplicate various elements of our business operations, and more chains may copy us to varying degrees in the future.

Several of our competitors also compete by offering menu items that are specifically identified as low in carbohydrates, better for customersguests or otherwise targeted at particular consumer preferences. Many of our competitors in the fast-casual and quick-service segments of the restaurant industry also emphasize lower-cost, “value meal” menu options, a strategy we do not currently pursue. Our sales may be adversely affected by these and other competing products, or by price competition more generally.

Any of these competitive factors may adversely affect us and reduce our sales and profits.

Our business could be adversely affected by increased labor costs or difficulties in finding, training and retaining top performing employees.

Labor isWe rely on our restaurant employees to provide an outstanding guest experience, and as a primary component of our operating costs, andresult we believe good managers and crew and outstanding training are key parts of our success. Delivering excellent guest experiences depends substantially on the energy and skills of our employees and our ability to hire, train, motivate and keep qualified employees, especially general managers and crew members. Turnover among our restaurant crews and managers has been frequent, and we aim to reduce turnover in an effort to keep top performing employees and better realize our investment in training new employees. Failure to do so will adversely impact our operating results by increasing training costs and making it more difficult to deliver outstanding guest experiences, which may adversely impact our sales. Our failure to find and keep enough high-caliber employees could also delay planned restaurant openings, which would slow our growth.

In addition, labor is a primary component of our operating costs.  Increased labor costs due to factors such as competition for workers and labor market pressures, increased minimum wage requirements, increased healthcare costs, increased costs to apply with new and/or changing regulations, paid sick leave or vacation accrual mandates, or changes in our restaurant staffing structure have and may continue to adversely impact our operating costs. Many companies, both in the restaurant industry and in other industries with which we compete for employees, have implemented company-wide or targeted increases in starting wages or other enhancements to their compensation and benefit programs, and we may need to act similarly to continue to attract employees.  For instance, inDuring 2018 we plan to increaseincreased benefits to salaried and hourly managers, including additional paid leave, short term disability coverage, and a one-time cash bonus to all restaurant employees, which will increaseincreased our labor costs.These enhancements, and any further increases in labor costs associated with additional market pressures on wages or other factors, will adversely impact our operating results.

Moreover, if our managers do not schedule our restaurant crews efficiently, our restaurants may be overstaffed at some times, which adversely impacts our labor costs as a percentage of revenue, decreasing our operating margins.  Efficient staffing may continue to be a challenge in 20182019 due to continued volatility and uncertainty in our sales trends.  Additional taxes or requirements to incur additional employee benefits expenses could also adversely impact our labor costs. And during 2018, we expect to hire a greater proportion of our restaurant managers from outside our company than we have in the past.  These employees may be more expensive to hire and train than managers promoted from crew, and we may not successfully integrate them into our restaurant teams, which could adversely impact our operations.

In addition, our success in delivering excellent customer experiences depends substantially on the energy and skills of our employees and our ability to hire, train, motivate and keep qualified employees, especially general managers and crew members. Turnover among our restaurant crews and managers has been frequent, and we aim to reduce turnover in an effort to keep top

14


Table of Contents

performing employees and better realize our investment in training new employees. Failure to do so will adversely impact our operating results by increasing training costs and making it more difficult to deliver outstanding customer experiences. Our failure to find and keep enough high-caliber employees could also delay planned restaurant openings, which would slow our growth.

We use the “E-Verify” program, an Internet-based, free program run by the U.S. government, to verify employment eligibility for all employees throughout our company. However, use of E-Verify does not guarantee that we will successfully identify all applicants who are ineligible for employment. Although we use E-Verify and require all workers to provide us with government-specified documentation evidencing their employment eligibility, some of our employees may, without our knowledge, be unauthorized workers. Unauthorized workers may subject us to fines or penalties, and if we are found to be employing unauthorized workers, we could experience adverse publicity that negatively impacts our brand and may make it more difficult to hire and keep qualified employees. For example, following an audit by the Department of Homeland Security of the work authorization documents of our restaurant employees in Minnesota during 2010, we lost approximately 450 employees, resulting in a temporary increase in labor costs and disruption of our operations, including slower throughput, as we trained new employees, as well as some degree of negative publicity. The resulting broad-based civil and criminal investigations by the U.S. Attorney for the District of Columbia and U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission of our compliance with work authorization requirements and related disclosures and statements resulted in significant legal costs. Termination of a significant number of employees in specific markets or across our company due to work authorization or other regulatory issues would disrupt our operations including slowing our throughput, and could also cause additional adverse publicity and temporary increases in our labor costs as we train new employees. We could also become subject to fines, penalties and other costs related to claims that we did not fully comply with all recordkeeping obligations of federal and state immigration compliance laws. Our reputation and financial performance may be materially harmed as a result of any of these factors.  Furthermore, immigration laws have been an area of considerable political focus in recent years, and the U.S. Congress and Department of Homeland Security from time to time consider or implement changes to Federal immigration laws, regulations or enforcement programs. Further changes in immigration or work authorization laws may increase our obligations for compliance and oversight, which could subject us to additional costs and potential liability and make our hiring process more cumbersome, or reduce the availability of potential employees.

Because we do not franchise, risks associated with hiring and maintaining a large workforce, including increases in wage rates or the cost of employee benefits, compliance with laws and regulations related to the hiring, payment and termination of employees, and employee-related litigation, may be more pronounced for us than for restaurant companies at which some or all of these risks are borne by franchisees or other operating contractors.

Changes in food and supply costs could adversely affect our results of operations.

Our profitability depends in part on our ability to anticipate and react to changes in food and supply costs. Like all restaurant companies, we are susceptible to increases in food costs as a result of factors beyond our control, such as general economic conditions, seasonal fluctuations, weather conditions, global demand, food safety concerns, generalized infectious diseases, fluctuations of the U.S. dollar, product recalls and government regulations. The cost of many basic foods for humans and animals, including corn, wheat, rice and cooking oils, has increased markedly in some years, resulting in upward pricing pressures on almost all of our raw ingredients including chicken, beef, tortillas and rice.    In 2017, a significant rise in avocado pricesEfforts to negotiate with suppliers to limit any such price increases may not be successful, or may adversely impactedimpact our food costs for mostrelationship with suppliers. 

14


Table of the year, and there could be similar or greater pricing pressure on key ingredients in future periods.  Costs have also increased from the enhanced food safety procedures described elsewhere in this report. Contents

Additionally, a substantial volume of produce items are grown in Mexico and other countries, and somea significant portion of our meats and restaurant supplies are sourced from outside the U.S. as well.  Any new or increased import duties, tariffs or taxes, or other changes in U.S. trade or tax policy, including any new or increased export duties, tariffs or taxes, or other changes in trade or tax policy as a result of retaliation by the countries from which we source our ingredients in response to such changes in U.S. trade or tax policy, or any localized labor disturbances or political unrest in the areas from which we source our ingredients, could result in higher food and supply costs that would adversely impact our financial results.

We could also be adversely impacted by price increases specific to meats raised in accordance with our sustainability and animal welfare criteria or other food items we buy as part of our Food With Integrity focus, the markets for which are generally smaller and more concentrated than the markets for food products that are conventionally raised and grown. Weather related issues, such as freezes or drought, may also lead to temporary spikes in the prices of some ingredients such as produce or meats. Increasing weather volatility or other long-term changes in global weather patterns, including any changes associated with global climate change, could have a significant impact on the price or availability of some of our ingredients. Any increase in the prices of the ingredients most critical to our menu, such as chicken, beef, cheese, avocados, beans, rice, tomatoes and pork, would have a particularly adverse effect on our operating results. Alternatively, in the event of cost increases with respect to one or more of our raw ingredients, we may choose to temporarily suspend serving menu items, such as guacamole or one or more of our salsas, rather than paying the increased cost for the ingredients. Any such changes to our available menu may negatively impact our restaurant traffic and comparable restaurant sales, and could also have an adverse impact on our brand.

15


Table of Contents

Food safety scares could adversely affect customerconsumer perceptions of, or the price or availability of, ingredients we use to prepare our food, which may adversely impact our sales.sales.

Past reports linking nationwide or regional incidents of food-borne illnesses such as salmonella, E. coli, hepatitis A, listeria or noroviruslisteria to certain produce items or other ingredients have caused us to temporarily suspend serving some ingredients in our foods or to otherwise alter our menu, andor have resulted in consumers avoiding certain food products for a period of time. Similarly, outbreaks of avian flu, incidents of “mad cow” disease, or similar concerns have also caused consumers to avoid any products that are, or are suspected of being, affected. These problems, and injuries caused by food tampering, have had in the past, and could have in the future have an adverse effect on the price and availability of affected ingredients. A decrease in customerguest traffic as a result of these health concerns or negative publicity, or as a result of a change in our menu or dining experience or a temporary closure of any of our restaurants due to the types of food scares described above, would further adversely impact our restaurant sales and profitability. In addition, if we react to these problems by changing our menu or other key aspects of the Chipotle experience, we may lose customersguests who do not accept those changes, and may not be able to attract enough new customersguests to generate sufficient revenue to make our restaurants profitable. CustomersGuests may also shift away from us if we choose to pass along to consumers any higher ingredient or operating costs resulting from supply problems or operational changes associated with incidents of food-borne illnesses, which would also have a negative impact on our sales and profitability.

Changes we have made in our operations, or that we make in the future, to further enhance the safety of the food we serve will adversely impact our financial performance and may negatively impact customerconsumer perception of our brand.brand.

As a result of the food safety incidents described elsewhere in this report, we have implemented a number of enhancements to our food safety protocols to ensure that our food is as safe as it can be.  Many of our enhanced procedures, which go beyond the industry-standard food safety practices that we were previously following, increase the cost of some ingredients or the amount of labor required to prepare and serve our food.  If we aren’tare not able to sufficiently increase sales to offset the increased costs resulting from these changes, our margins will fall well short of levels we have historically achieved.achieved and may not meet analyst and investor expectations in the future.  Even if we were to restore sales to levels we were achieving prior to the fourth quarter of 2015, the increased costs from these changes are likely to result in lower margins than we were able to achieve in the past.

Additionally, some of the enhanced food safety procedures we have introduced or may introduce in the future rely on increased use of centralized food preparation, additional in-restaurant preparation steps, or new ingredients, some or all of which may be inconsistent with previous customerguest perceptions of our restaurant operations.  To the extent customersguests perceive any of these developments as a move away from our Food With Integrity strategy and/or towards a more traditional fast food experience, our ability to win back customersguests may be adversely impacted and our sales may decline or recover more slowly than they otherwise would have.  Furthermore, even the most advanced food safety measures cannot eliminate all food safety risks from a restaurant environment.  For risks related to any future food safety incidents associated with our restaurants, see “Risks Related to our Plans to ImproveGrow Our Sales and Profitability and Restore our Economic Model – Profitability—We may continue to be negatively impacted by food safety incidents, and further instances of food-borne or localized illnesses associated with our restaurants would result in increased negative publicity and further adverse impacts on customer perceptions of our brand.incidents...

15


Table of Contents

Failure to receive frequent deliveries of higher-quality food ingredients and other supplies meeting our specifications could harm our operations.

Our ability to maintainprovide the experience our menuguests expect depends in part on our ability to acquire ingredients that meet our specifications from reliable suppliers. Shortages or interruptions in the supplyUnavailability of ingredients caused by unanticipated demand, problems in production or distribution, food contamination, (which we may detect more frequently under the microbiological testing protocols we’ve recently introduced), inclement weather, a supplier ceasing operations or deciding not to follow our required protocols, or other conditions could adversely affect the availability, quality and cost of our ingredients, which could harm our operations.ingredients.  In particular, shortages of one or more of our menu items could force our restaurants to remove items from their menus, which may result in customersguests choosing to eat elsewhere.  If that happens, our affected restaurants could experience significant reductions in sales during the menu item shortage, and potentially thereafter if customersguests do not return to us after the shortage is resolved. Our focus on a limited menu would make the consequences of a shortage of a key ingredient more severe to us than at other restaurants.

For many of our food ingredients and other supplies we do not have long-term contracts with suppliers, and we have relied largely on a third partythird-party distribution network with a limited number of distribution partners. If any of our distributors or suppliers performs inadequately, or our distribution or supply relationships are disrupted for any reason, the risk of ingredient shortages may increase and our business, financial condition, results of operations or cash flows could be adversely affected. We currently depend on a limited number of suppliers for some of our key ingredients, including beef, pork, chicken, tofu, beans, rice, sour cream, cheese, and tortillas. Due to the unique nature of the products we receive from our Food With Integrity suppliers and as described in more detail below under “Risks RelatedUnique to Our Unique Business StrategyStrategy—Our Food With Integrity philosophy subjects us to risks,” these

16


Table of Contents

suppliers could be more difficult to replace if we were no longer able to rely on them. If we have to seek new suppliers and service providers, we may be subject to pricing or other terms less favorable than those we currently enjoy. If we cannot replace or engage distributors or suppliers who meet our specifications in a short period of time, that could increase our expenses and cause shortages of food and other items at our restaurants, which could cause a restaurant to remove items from its menu.  If that were to happen and customers change their dining habits as a result, affected restaurants could experience significant reductions in sales during the shortage or thereafter.  Our focus on a limited menu would make the consequences of a shortage of a key ingredient more severe.

In the first quarter of 2015, through our ongoing auditing of suppliers, we identified a pork supplier that was not meeting our standards and suspended purchases of pork from this supplier. Without this supply, we did not have enough pork meeting our specifications for all of our restaurants and a large number of our restaurants were not serving carnitas for a number of months during 2015.  We believe our comparable restaurant sales were adversely impacted as a result, as customers chose to eat elsewhere rather than substituting a different one of our menu items for carnitas.restaurants.

Changes in customerconsumer tastes and preferences, spending patterns and demographic trends could cause sales to decline.

Changes in customerconsumer preferences, general economic conditions, discretionary spending priorities, demographic trends, traffic patterns, and the type, number and location of competing restaurants affect the restaurant industry. Our sales could be impacted by changes in consumer preferences, including in response to dietary concerns includingsuch as preferences regarding items such as calories, sodium, carbohydrates, fat, consumption of animal products or fat.other nutritional considerations. These changes could result in consumers avoiding our menu items in favor of other foods, and our focus on a limited menu could make the consequences of a change in consumer preferences more severe than our competitors may face. Some customersconsumers could also avoid freshly-prepared foods like those we serve, based on concerns regarding food safety.  This may be more likely to impact us as a result of the widely-publicized food safety incidents we experienced beginning in the fourth quarter of 2015.

Our success also depends to a significant extent on consumer confidence, which is influenced by general economic conditions and discretionary income levels. Our average restaurant sales may decline during economic downturns or periods of uncertainty, which can be caused by various factors such as high unemployment, increasing taxes, interest rates, or other changes in fiscal or monetary policy, high gasoline prices, declining home prices, tight credit markets or foreign political or economic unrest.unrest in the U.S. and/or abroad.  Any material decline in consumer confidence or a decline in family “food away from home” spending could cause our sales, operating results, profits, business or financial condition to decline. If we fail to adapt to changes in customerconsumer preferences and trends, we may lose customersguests and our sales may deteriorate.

If we were to experience widespread difficulty renewing existing leases on favorable terms, our revenue or occupancy costs could be adversely affected.

We lease substantially all of the properties on which we operate restaurants, and some of our leases are due for renewal or extension options in the next several years. Some leases are subject to renewal at fair market value, which could involve substantial increases, and a smaller number expire without any renewal option. While we currently expect to pursue the renewal of substantially all of our expiring restaurant leases, any difficulty renewing a significant number of such leases, or any substantial increase in rents associated with lease renewals, could adversely impact us. If we have to close any restaurants due to difficulties in renewing leases, we would lose revenue from the affected restaurants and may not be able to open suitable replacement restaurants. Conversely, substantial increases in rents associated with lease renewals would increase our occupancy costs, reducing our restaurant margins.

16


Table of Contents

Risks RelatedUnique to our UniqueOur Business Strategy

We may not persuade customersconsumers of the benefits of paying our prices for higher-quality food.food.

Our success depends in large part on our ability to persuade customersconsumers that food made with higher-quality ingredients is worth the prices they will pay at our restaurants relative to prices offered by some of our competitors, particularly those in the quick-service restaurant segment. We may not successfully educate customersconsumers about the quality of our food, and customersconsumers may not care even if they do understand our approach. That could require us to change our pricing, advertising or promotional strategies, which could materially and adversely affect our results of operations or the brand identity that we have tried to create. Additionally, it will likelymay be more difficult for us to persuade the public about the quality and value of our food following theany food-borne illnesses we experienced in 2015associated with our restaurants, as further described above under “Risks Related to our Plans to Grow Our Sales and the associated deterioration of customer perceptions about our brand, and we cannot predict when those perceptions will improve, if ever.Profitability—We may continue to be negatively impacted by food safety incidents...  If customersconsumers are not persuaded that we offer a good value for their money, our restaurant transaction counts could be adversely affected, which would negatively impact our business results.

Our restructuring activities will increase our expenses, may not be successful, and may adversely impact employee hiring and retention.

During 2018, we opened a new headquarters office in Newport Beach, California, consolidated certain corporate administrative functions into our existing office in Columbus, Ohio, closed a corporate office in New York, New York, and commenced the closure of our previous headquarters office in Denver, Colorado. As a result of the foregoing actions, we incurred corporate restructuring costs totaling $42.6 million in the second, third and fourth quarters of 2018, and expect to incur additional corporate restructuring costs in 2019 aggregating approximately $5 million to $15 million. We also closed/relocated 45 Chipotle restaurants and five Pizzeria Locales throughout the country during 2018, and as a result we incurred restaurant exit costs of approximately $35.8 million in the second, third and fourth quarters of 2018, and expect to incur additional restaurant exit costs in 2019 aggregating approximately $1 million to $7 million. These expenses adversely impacted our results of operations during 2018 and reduced our cash position and will continue to adversely impact our results of operation and cash position.  Additionally, the amount of the restructuring expenses we expect to incur in 2019, as well as our ability to achieve the anticipated benefits of our restructuring activities, are subject to assumptions and uncertainties. There is no assurance that we will successfully implement or fully realize the anticipated benefits of our restructuring activities. If we fail to realize the anticipated benefits from these measures, or if we incur charges or costs in amounts that are greater than anticipated, our financial condition and operating results may be adversely affected to a greater degree than we currently expect.

In addition, the relocation of our headquarters office functions has necessitated that we hire and train a significant number of new employees to replace corporate support employees who did not continue with us as a result of the relocation.  Hiring and training significant numbers of support team employees could distract existing employees, decrease employee morale, make it more difficult to retain and hire new talent, and harm our reputation. This turnover and any resulting distraction could negatively impact the overall performance of our corporate support teams, resulting in inefficiencies, higher short- or long-term costs, failures in risk management or compensating controls, or decreased productivity in numerous support or administrative functions. The costs associated with hiring new talent may also be more significant than we currently expect. As a result of these or other similar risks, our business, results of operations and financial condition may be adversely affected.

A substantial portion of our senior management team is new, which may pose challenges, and our success may depend on the continued service and availability of key personnel.

Brian Niccol joined us as Chief Executive Officer in March 2018, and we added a new Chief Marketing Officer, Chris Brandt, and our first Chief People Officer, Marissa Andrada, in April 2018; added our first Chief Legal Officer and General Counsel, Roger Theodoredis, in October 2018; and added a new Chief Development Officer, Tabassum Zalotrawala, in December 2018. These officers have, in turn, hired a substantial number of new direct reports, and as a result, our senior management team is relatively new and may face challenges working together as a unit, aligning on strategic priorities and objectives, or integrating their new teams with one another.  These challenges may be exacerbated by our ongoing restructuring efforts as further described above under “—Our restructuring activities will increase our expenses, may not be successful, and may adversely impact employee hiring and retention.”  Our Board of Directors has experienced recent changes as well, including the addition of Mr. Niccol, as well as our founder and former Chief Executive Officer, Steve Ells, assuming the position of Executive Chairman, and these changes may add to the challenges inherent in assimilating a new management team.  Failure to meet these challenges successfully may adversely impact our operations, business results or long-term growth prospects.   

17


 

Table of Contents

 

Additionally, Jack Hartung, our Chief Financial Officer, has served with us since early in our company’s history and much of our growth, as well as the development of our restaurant economic model, has occurred under his direction. Curt Garner, who joined us as Chief Information Officer in November 2015, has had a key role in developing and executing our digital and mobile ordering platforms and strategy, and we believe these and other technology innovations will become increasingly important in helping us return to sales and profitability growth.  Scott Boatwright, who joined us as Chief Restaurant Officer in May 2017, has led our recent efforts to improve the guest experience in our restaurants, which we also believe will be critical in attracting new and lapsed guests. And Laurie Schalow, who joined us as Chief Communications Officer in August 2017, has been responsible for media relations efforts and other initiatives to improve public perceptions of our brand.  Each of our executive officers is an at-will employee, and any turnover among our executive officers may disrupt our progress in implementing our business strategies or otherwise negatively impact our growth prospects or future operating results.  Additionally, if our company culture or operations were to deteriorate following any additional changes in leadership, we may be adversely impacted as well.

Our Food With Integrity philosophy subjects us to risks.

The principle of Food With Integrity constitutes a significant part of our business strategy. We use a substantial amount of ingredients grown or raised with an emphasis on practices we believe to be more sustainable or responsible than some conventional practices, and we try to make our food as fresh as we can. We do, however, face challenges associated with pursuing Food With Integrity philosophy. There are higher costs and other risks associated with purchasing ingredients grown or raised with an emphasis on quality, sustainability and other responsible practices. Growth rate and weight gain can be lower for chickens, cattle and pigs that are not fed sub-therapeutic antibiotics and for cattle that are not given growth hormones. Crops grown organically or using other responsible practices can take longer to grow and crop yields can be lower. It can take longer to identify and secure relationships with suppliers that are able to meet our criteria for meat, dairy and produce ingredients. Given the costs associated with what we believe are more responsible farming practices, as well as uncertainty regarding demand due to changing customerconsumer perceptions, economic trends and other factors, many large suppliers have not found it economical to pursue business in this area. Although all of our restaurants generally serve meat from animals raised in accordance with criteria we’ve established in an effort to improve sustainability and promote animal welfare, we may experience shortages of meat meeting these criteria due to suppliers suspending production, market conditions, or other forces beyond our control. In the first quarter ofFor example, in 2015 through our ongoing auditing of suppliers, we identified a pork supplier that was not meeting our standards and suspended purchases of pork from thisthe supplier. Without this supply, we did not have enough pork meeting our specifications for all of our restaurants and a large number of our restaurants were not serving carnitas for a number of months during 2015.  We believe our comparable restaurant sales were2015, which adversely impacted as a result.sales.  We have experienced shortages of beef or chicken meeting our protocols on a periodic basis over the past several years as well, resulting in our serving commodity beef and chicken, which may have a negative impact on customerconsumer perceptions of our brand.

If as a result of any of the factors described above we are unable to obtain a sufficient and consistent supply of our preferred ingredients on a cost-effective basis, our food costs could increase, adversely impacting our operating margins. These factors could also cause us difficulties in aligning our brand with our Food With Integrity philosophy, which could make us less popular among our customersguests and cause sales to decline. Our commitment to the Food With Integrity philosophy may also leave us open to actions against us or criticism from special interest groups whose ideas regarding food issues differ from ours or who believe we should pursue different or additional goals with our Food With Integrity approach. Any adverse publicity that results from such criticism could damage our brand and adversely impact customerguest traffic at our restaurants.restaurants and damage our brand.  We may also face adverse publicity or liability for false advertising claims if suppliers do not adhere to all of the elements of our Food With Integrity programs, such as responsible meat protocols, requirements for organic or sustainable growing methods, our use of non-GMO ingredients in our food, and similar criteria on which we base our purchasing decisions. If any such supplier failures occur and are publicized, our reputation would be harmed and our sales may be adversely impacted. And our Food With Integrity message may result in customersconsumers holding us to a higher standard in terms of food safety as well, which may make it more difficult for us to recover from the food-borne illness incidents discussed elsewhere in this report, as customersconsumers who believe we failed to uphold our own standards may decline to return to our restaurants as frequently or at all.

Additionally, in response to increasing customerconsumer awareness and demand, some competitors have also begun to advertise their use of meats raised without the use of antibiotics or growth hormones, dairy products from cows not treated with rBGH, and other ingredients similar to those we seek as part of our Food With Integrity philosophy. If competitors become known for using these types of higher-quality or more sustainable ingredients, it could further limit our supply of these ingredients, and may also make it more difficult for us to differentiate Chipotle and our restaurants, either which could adversely impact our operating results.

Our success may depend on the continued service and availability of key personnel, and upcoming changes in our management team may not provide the benefits we expect.

Our Chairman and Chief Executive Officer Steve Ells founded our company, has been the principal architect of our business strategy, and has led our growth from a single restaurant in 1993 to over 2,400 restaurants today.  Jack Hartung, our Chief Financial Officer, has also served with us since early in our company’s history, and much of our growth has occurred under his direction as well. Additionally, Mark Crumpacker, our Chief Marketing and Strategy Officer, who has played a role in our marketing and branding efforts for many years and who has been an executive officer since joining us full time in January 2009, has been instrumental in formulating strategies to help us rebuild our business.  Curt Garner, who joined us as Chief Information Officer in November 2015, has had a key role in developing and executing our digital/mobile ordering platforms and strategy, and we believe these and other technology innovations will become increasingly important in helping us return to sales and profitability growth.  And Scott Boatwright, who joined us as Chief Restaurant Officer in May 2017, has led our recent efforts to improve the guest experience in our restaurants, which we also believe will be critical in attracting new and lapsed customers. 

In December 2017, we announced that we have initiated a search for a new Chief Executive Officer, and that Mr. Ells will transition to the role of Executive Chairman of the Board upon the appointment of a new Chief Executive Officer.  It may be difficult to identify and attract a Chief Executive Officer candidate who meets our needs and is able to grasp and implement our unique

18


 

Table of Contents

 

strategic vision.Pizzeria Locale and other new restaurant concepts may not contribute to our growth.

We believe that the fundamental principles on which our restaurants are based – finding better ingredients, preparing them using classic techniques in front of the guest, and serving them in an interactive format with great teams dedicated to providing an excellent dining experience – can be adapted to cuisines other than the food served at Chipotle. In addition,order to see how our model works when we believe our current executive officers, eachuse different ingredients and a different style of whom is an at-will employee, are creatingfood, we opened a business strategynumber of ShopHouse Southeast Asian Kitchen restaurants beginning in 2011, and culture at ourone Tasty Made burger restaurant in Ohio in 2016.  We also have a majority ownership interest in a company that, will positionuntil late 2018, operated seven fast casual Pizzeria Locale restaurants in Denver, Colorado, Kansas City, Missouri and Cincinnati, Ohio. ShopHouse and TastyMade were not able to achieve a level of sales and profitability that made them attractive to us for future success,investment, and these featureswe recognized a $14.5 million non-cash impairment charge, representing substantially all of the value of long-lived assets of ShopHouse, during the year ended December 31, 2016, and closed all of the ShopHouse locations in the first half of 2017. We closed TastyMade in 2018, and also closed the five Pizzeria Locale restaurants outside of Denver in 2018 as part of our program to close underperforming restaurants throughout the country.  Furthermore, Pizzeria Locale has significantly lower brand awareness, lower sales and less operating experience than most Chipotle restaurants, and may be difficult to replicate under another management team. Ifalso not achieve restaurant economics that make the concept attractive for further investment in the future.  There are also numerous competitors in the pizza market, including a new Chief Executive Officer doesnumber of large and well-known brands, and a number of other companies or individuals in the restaurant industry have recently opened or invested in fast-casual pizza concepts.

Notwithstanding our investment in Pizzeria Locale and exploration of other restaurant brand opportunities, our immediate focus will remain on thoughtfully growing the Chipotle brand. As a result, we do not successfully continue our business strategy or implement new strategies to improve our business, or if the change in Chief Executive Officerexpect Pizzeria Locale or other factors resultconcepts to contribute to our growth in a meaningful way for at least the next several years.  We may also determine not to move forward with any further expansion of Pizzeria Locale, which may limit our overall growth potential over the long term. Conversely, any expansion of Pizzeria Locale or investments in other changes torestaurant concepts might distract our senior leadership team,management, which could have an adverse impact on our growth prospects or future operating results may be adversely impacted.  Additionally, if our company culture or operations were to deteriorate following our upcoming change in leadership, we may be adversely impacted as well. core Chipotle business.

Regulatory and Legal Risks

Governmental regulation in one or more of the following areas may adversely affect our existing and future operations and results, including by harming our ability to open new restaurants or increasing our operating costs.

Employment and Immigration Regulations

We are subject to various federal, state and local laws and regulations governing our relationship with and other matters pertaining to our employees, including wage and hour laws, requirements to provide meal and rest periods or other benefits, family leave mandates, requirements regarding working conditions and accommodations to certain employees, citizenship or work authorization and related requirements, insurance and workers’ compensation rules, healthcare laws, scheduling notification requirements and anti-discrimination and anti-harassment laws. Complying with these ruleslaws and regulations subjects us to substantial expense and can be cumbersome, and can also expose us to liabilities from claims forof non-compliance. For example, a number of lawsuits have been filed against us alleging violations of federal and state laws regarding employee wages and payment of overtime, meal and rest breaks, employee classification, employee record-keeping and related practices with respect to our employees. We incur legal costs to defend, and we could suffer losses from, these and similar cases, and the amount of such losses or costs could be significant. In addition, several states and localities in which we operate and the federal government have from time to time enacted minimum wage increases, changes to eligibility for overtime pay, paid sick leave and mandatory vacation accruals, and similar requirements and these changes have increased our labor costs and may have a further negative impact on our labor costs in the future. In addition, in November 2017, the Fair Value Workweek legislation was implemented in New York City, which requires fast food employers to provide employees with specified notice in scheduling changes and pay premiums for changes made to employees’ schedules, amongst other requirements. Similar legislation may be enacted in other jurisdictions in which we operate in as well, and could increase ourresult in increased labor costs. Changes in U.S. healthcare laws could also adversely impact us if they result in significant new welfare and benefit costs or increased compliance expenses.

 

19


Table of Contents

We also are audited from timerequired to time for compliancecomply with work authorization requirements, and audit activity and federal criminal and civil investigations in this area are described in more detail above under “Risks Related to Operating in the Restaurant IndustryOur business could be adversely affected by increased labor costs or difficulties in finding and retaining top performing employees,” as well as in Note 10. “Commitments and Contingencies” in our consolidated financial statements included in Item 8. “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.”verification requirements.  Unauthorized workers may subject us to fines or penalties, and if any of our workers are found to be unauthorized our business may be disrupted as we try to replace lost workers with additional qualified employees. For example, following an audit by the Department of Homeland Security of the work authorization documents of our restaurant employees in Minnesota during 2010, we lost approximately 450 employees, resulting in a temporary increase in labor costs and disruption of our operations, including slower throughput, as we trained new employees, as well as some degree of negative publicity. The resulting broad-based civil and criminal investigations by the U.S. Attorney for the District of Columbia and U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission resulted in significant legal costs. Termination of a significant number of employees in specific markets or across our company due to work authorization or other regulatory issues would disrupt our operations including slowing our throughput, and could also cause additional adverse publicity and temporary increases in our labor costs as we train new employees. We could also become subject to fines, penalties and other costs related to claims that we did not fully comply with all recordkeeping obligations of federal and state immigration compliance laws. We use the “E-Verify” program, an Internet-based, free program run by the U.S. government, to verify employment eligibility for all employees throughout our company. However, use of E-Verify does not guarantee that we will successfully identify all applicants who are ineligible for employment. On the other hand, in the event we wrongfullyerroneously reject work authorization documents, or if our compliance procedures are found to have a disparate impact on a protected class such as a racial minority or based on the citizenship status of applicants, we could be found to be in violation of anti-discrimination laws. We could experience adverse publicity arising from enforcement activity related to work authorization compliance, anti-discrimination compliance, or both, that negatively impacts our brandOur reputation and financial performance may make it more difficult to hire and keep qualified employees. Moreover,be materially harmed as described above under “Risks Related to Operatinga result of any of these factors.  Furthermore, immigration laws have been an area of considerable political focus in the Restaurant IndustryOur business could be adversely affected by increased labor costs or difficulties in finding and retaining top performing employees,” the office of the U.S. Attorney for the District of Columbiarecent years, and the U.S. SecuritiesCongress and Exchange Commission investigated us for possible criminal and civil securities law violations relatingDepartment of Homeland Security from time to our employeetime consider or implement changes to Federal immigration laws, regulations or enforcement programs. Further changes in immigration or work authorization laws may increase our obligations for compliance and related disclosures and statements as well. Any potential future investigations in this area may be expensive and distracting, andoversight, which could subject us to fines, reputational damage,additional costs and other liabilities that could be significant.potential liability and make our hiring process more cumbersome, or reduce the availability of potential employees.

Additionally, while we do not currently have any unionized employees, union organizers have engaged in efforts to organize our employees and those of other restaurant companies. If a significant portion of our employees were to become union organized, our labor costs could increase and our efforts to maintain a culture appealing only to top performing employees could be impaired. Potential changes in labor laws, including the possible passage of legislation designed to make it easier for employees to unionize, could increase the likelihood of some or all of our employees being subjected to greater organized labor influence, and could have an adverse effect on our business and financial results by imposing requirements that could potentially increase our costs, reduce our flexibility and impact our employee culture.

Americans with Disabilities Act and Similar State Laws

We are subject to the U.S. Americans with Disabilities Act, or ADA, and similar state laws that give civil rights protections to individuals with disabilities in the context of employment, public accommodations and other areas. We have incurred substantial legal fees in connection with ADA-related complaints in the past, and we may in the future have to modify restaurants, for example by adding access ramps or redesigning certain architectural features, to provide service to or make reasonable accommodations for

19


Table of Contents

disabled persons under these laws. The expenses associated with these modifications, or any damages, legal fees and costs associated with litigating or resolving claims under the ADA or similar state laws, could be material.

Nutrition and Food Regulation

In recent years, there has been an increased legislative, regulatory and consumer focus at the federal, state and municipal levels on the food industry including nutrition and advertising practices. Restaurants operating in the quick-service and fast-casual segments have been a particular focus. For example, the State of California, New York City and a number of other jurisdictions around the U.S. have adopted regulations requiring that chain restaurants include calorie information on their menu boards or make other nutritional information available, and nation-wide nutrition disclosure requirements included in the U.S. health care reform law are scheduled to go into effect on May 7, 2018. These nutrition disclosure requirements may increase our expenses or slow customers as they move through the line, decreasing our throughput. These initiatives may also change customer buying habits in a way that adversely impacts our sales, and could subject us to liability if we make errors in calculating or disclosing the required information.

Privacy/Cybersecurity

We are required to collect and maintain personal information about our employees, and we collect information about customersguests as part of some of our marketing programs as well. The collection and use of such information is regulated at the federal and state levels, and by the European Union and its member states, and the regulatory environment related to information security and privacy is evolving and increasingly demanding. Significant new privacy regulation in the European Union is further described above under “Risks Related to our Plans to Improve Our Sales and Profitability and Restore our Economic Model Our expansion into international markets has been limited, and may present increased risks due to lower customerconsumer awareness of our brand, our unfamiliarity with those markets and other factors.factors.”   At the same time, we are relying increasingly on cloud computing and other technologies that result in third parties holding significant amounts of customerguest or employee information on our behalf. If our security and information systems or those of outsourced third party providers we use to store or process such information or those of our delivery partners, are compromised, or if we or such third parties otherwise fail to comply with these laws and regulations, we could face litigation and the imposition of penalties that could adversely affect our financial performance. Our reputation as a brand or as an employer could also be adversely affected from these types of security breaches or regulatory violations, which could impair our sales or ability to attract and keep qualified employees. Additional risks related to cybersecurity are described below under “General Business Risks-We may be harmed by security risks we face in connection with our electronic processing and transmission of confidential customerguest and employee information.

Americans with Disabilities Act and Similar State Laws

We are subject to the ADA and similar state laws that give civil rights protections to individuals with disabilities in the context of employment, public accommodations and other areas. We have incurred substantial legal fees in connection with ADA-related complaints in the past, and we may in the future have to modify restaurants, for example by adding access ramps or redesigning certain architectural features, to provide service to or make reasonable accommodations for disabled persons under these laws. The expenses associated with these modifications, or any damages, legal fees and costs associated with litigating or resolving claims under the ADA or similar state laws, could be material.

20


Table of Contents

Nutrition and Food Regulation

In recent years, there has been an increased legislative, regulatory and consumer focus at the federal, state and municipal levels on the food industry including nutrition and advertising practices. Restaurants operating in the quick-service and fast-casual segments have been a particular focus. Regulations requiring that chain restaurants include calorie information on their menu boards and make other nutritional information available went in place across the U.S. in May 2018, and states and localities have also proposed or adopted regulation of or taxes on certain beverage products, kids’ meals, and other food products or practices. These requirements may increase our expenses, change guest buying habits in a way that adversely impacts our sales, or subject us to liability if we make errors in complying with the requirements.

Local Licensure, Zoning and Other Regulation

Each of our restaurants is also subject to state and local licensing and regulation by health, alcoholic beverage, sanitation, food and workplace safety and other agencies. We may experience material difficulties or failures in obtaining the necessary licenses or approvals for new restaurants, which could delay planned restaurant openings. In addition, stringent and varied requirements of local regulators with respect to zoning, land use and environmental factors could delay or prevent development of new restaurants in particular locations.

Environmental Laws

We are subject to federal, state and local environmental laws and regulations concerning the discharge, storage, handling, release and disposal of hazardous or toxic substances, as well as local ordinances restricting the use of straws, utensils, and the types of packaging we can use in our restaurants. WeRestrictions on the use of certain materials in our restaurants may subject us to increased costs for paper, packaging and other non-food items.  In addition, although we have not conducted a comprehensive environmental review of our properties or operations. We have, however, conductedoperations, investigations of some of our properties andhas identified contamination caused by third-party operations. WeWhile we believe any such contamination has been or should be addressed by the third party. Ifparty, if the relevant third party does not address or has not addressed the identified contamination properly or completely, then under certain environmental laws, we could be held liable under certain environmental laws as an owner or operator to address any remaining contamination, sometimes without regard to whether we knew of, or were responsible for, the release or presence of hazardous or toxic substances. Any such liability could be material. Further, we may not have identified all of the potential environmental liabilities at our properties, and any such liabilities could have a material adverse effect on our operations or results of operations. We also cannot predict what environmental laws will be enacted in the future, how existing or future environmental laws will be administered or interpreted, or the amount of future expenditures that we may need to make to comply with, or to satisfy claims relating to, environmental laws.

Healthcare Regulation

We offer eligible full-time and part-time U.S. employees the opportunity to enroll in healthcare coverage subsidized by us. For various reasons, many of our eligible employees currently choose not to participate in our healthcare plans. Under the comprehensive U.S. health care reform law enacted in 2010, the Affordable Care Act, employers can be subjected to penalties for failure to provide a healthcare plan which is deemed to be both “affordable” and offers minimal essential coverage. We have incurred fines associated with this regulation in the past, and future costs associated with these healthcare requirements cannot be determined with certainty, but may have a material adverse effect on our financial statements.

Other Aspects of Regulatory Risk

From time to time we are the target of litigation in connection with various laws and regulations that cover our business. Much of this litigation occurs in California even though currently only about 17% of our restaurants are located there. As we continue to

20


Table of Contents

expand in California, or if we are not able to effectively manage the increased litigation risks and expenses we have experienced in California, our business may be adversely impacted to a greater extent than if we did not operate in, or minimized our operations in, California.

Because we do not franchise, the costs of compliance and other risks associated with government regulation of our business, as described above, may be more pronounced for us than for restaurant companies at which some or all of these risks are borne by franchisees or other operating contractors.

21


Table of Contents

Regulatory actions and litigation related to food safety incidents that impacted us beginning in the fourth quarter of 2015 may adversely impact us.

We are facing an ongoing government investigation into food safety incidents and related compliance measures, as described in Note 10.13. “Commitments and Contingencies” in our consolidated financial statements included in Item 8. “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.”  We also have received numerous claims from customersguests who were or claim to have been impacted by food safety incidents associated with our restaurants, and a number of those claimants have filed lawsuits against us.  We are cooperating in the government investigation and with many of the customersguests impacted by these incidents, but will continue to incur significant legal and other costs in doing so. We have also been sued in atwo separate shareholder class action lawsuitlawsuits in connection with the declinedeclines in our stock price in the wake of the food safety incidents, and defending this lawsuit willthese lawsuits may subject us to significant additional legal expense.expenses.  Additionally, the liabilities from customerguest claims and related litigation expenses may be greater than we anticipate due to the uncertainties inherent in litigation.  All of these costs, liabilities and expenses will negatively impact our operating results. Moreover, publicity regarding any legal proceedings related to food safety incidents may increase or prolongheighten consumer awareness of theour past food safety incidents or otherwise negatively impact perceptions of our brand, which may hamper our ability to regain lost sales or attract new customers toincrease our restaurants.sales.

We could be party to litigation that could adversely affect us by distracting management, increasing our expenses or subjecting us to material money damages and other remedies.

We’re subject to numerous claims alleging violations of federal and state laws regarding workplace and employment matters, including wages, work hours, overtime, vacation and family leave, discrimination, wrongful termination, and similar matters, and we could become subject to class action or other lawsuits related to these or different matters in the future. Our customersguests also occasionally file complaints or lawsuits against us alleging that we’re responsible for some illness or injury they suffered at or after a visit to our restaurants, or that we have problems with food quality, operations or our food related disclosure or advertising practices. See “—Governmental regulation in one or more of the following areas may adversely affect our existing and future operations and results, including by harming our ability to open new restaurants or increasing our operating costs” above, for additional discussion of these types of claims. From time to time, we also face claims alleging that technology we use in our business infringes patents held by third parties. In addition, the restaurant industry has been subject to a growing number of claims based on the nutritional content of food products sold and other disclosure and advertising practices. We have been subject to a number of these actions and may be subject to additional actions of this type in the future. We are also undergoing government investigations and have been sued in atwo shareholder class action lawsuit,lawsuits, each as described elsewhere in this report, including in Note 10.13. “Commitments and Contingencies” in our consolidated financial statements included in Item 8. “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data,” and these matters may be particularly expensive to defend and/or resolve.

We believe the number of many of the foregoing types of claims has increased as our business has grown and we have become more visible to potential plaintiffs and their lawyers, particularly in California. Regardless of whether any claims against us are valid, or whether we’re ultimately held liable for such claims, they may be expensive to defend and may divert time and money away from our operations and hurt our performance. A significant judgment for any claims against us could materially and adversely affect our financial condition or results of operations. Any adverse publicity resulting from these allegations, whether directed at us or at fast casual or quick-service restaurants generally, may also materially and adversely affect our reputation or prospects, which in turn could adversely affect our results.

General Business Risks

We may be harmed by security risks we face in connection with our electronic processing and transmission of confidential customerguest and employee information.

We accept electronic payment cards for payment in our restaurants. During 20172018, approximately 73%76% of our sales were attributable to credit and debit card transactions, and credit and debit card usage could continue to increase. A number of retailers have experienced actual or potential security breaches in which credit and debit card information may have been stolen, including a number of highly publicized incidents with well-known retailers in recent years.

21


Table of Contents

In April 2017, our information security team detected unauthorized activity on the network that supports payment processing for our restaurants, and immediately began an investigation with the help of leading computer security firms.  We also self-reported the issue to payment card processors and law enforcement.  Ourensuing investigation detected malware designed to access payment card data from cards used at point-of-sale devices at most Chipotleof our restaurants, primarily in the period from March 24, 2017 through April 18, 2017.  We have removed the malware from our systems and continue to work to enhance our security measures.measures, including a planned implementation of new payment processing technology in substantially all of our restaurants during 2019. However, we expect to be subject to payment card network assessments and may incur regulatory fines or penalties, for which our insurance coverage is limited, and as a result, we recorded a $30 million estimated liability.liability, of which approximately $29 million remained in accrued liabilities as of December 31, 2018. We may ultimately be subject to liabilities greater than or less than the amount accrued. See Note 10.13. “Commitments and Contingencies” included in Item 8. “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data,” for further discussion of potential liabilities and pending litigation filed against us in connection with this incident.

22


Table of Contents

We may be subject to additional lawsuits or other proceedings in the future relating to the 2017 incident or any future incidents in which payment card data may have been compromised.  Proceedings related to theft of credit or debit card information may be brought by payment card providers, banks and credit unions that issue cards, cardholders (either individually or as part of a class action lawsuit) and federal and state regulators. Any such proceedings could distract our management from running our business and cause us to incur significant unplanned losses and expenses. Consumer perception of our brand could also be negatively affected by these events, which could further adversely affect our results and prospects.

We also are required to collect and maintain personal information about our employees, and we collect information about customersguests as part of some of our marketing programs as well. The collection and use of such information is regulated at the federal and state levels, and by the European Union and its member states, and the regulatory environment related to information security and privacy is increasingly demanding. For example, a new privacy regulation in the European Union called the General Data Protection Regulation, or GDPR, is scheduled to becomebecame effective in May 2018 and requires companies to meet new requirements regarding the handling of personal data, including its use, protection and the ability of persons whose data is stored to correct or delete such data about themselves. Failure to meet GDPR requirements could result in penalties of up to 4% of worldwide revenue. Similarly, the California Consumer Privacy Act is due to take effect January 1, 2020, and will require our instituting additional new processes and protections. 

At the same time, we are relying increasingly on cloud computing and other technologies that result in third parties holding significant amounts of customerguest or employee information on our behalf. We have seen an increase over the past several years in the frequency and sophistication of attempts to compromise the security of several of these systems. If the security and information systems that we or our outsourced third party providers use to store or process such information are compromised or if we, or such third parties, otherwise fail to comply with these laws and regulations, we could face litigation and the imposition of penalties that could adversely affect our financial performance. Our reputation as a brand or as an employer could also be adversely affected fromby these types of security breaches or regulatory violations, which could impair our sales or ability to attract and keep qualified employees.

If we experience a significant failure in or interruption of certain key information technology systems, our business could be adversely impacted.

We use a variety of applications and systems to securely manage the flow of information within each of our restaurants and withinas well as our centralized corporate infrastructure.infrastructure, and to administer a number of significant business functions. The services available within our systems and applications include restaurant operations, supply chain, inventory, scheduling, training, human capital management, financial tools, and data protection services. TheOur restaurant IT structure is based primarily on a point-of-sale system that operates locally at the restaurant and is integrated with other functions necessary to restaurant operations.  ItThe point-of-sale system records sales transactions, receives out of store orders, and authorizes, batches, and transmits credit card transactions. The systemIt also allows employees to enter time clock information and to produce a variety of management reports. Select information that is captured from this system at each restaurant is collected in the central corporate infrastructure, which enables management to continually monitor operating results.  Our ability to efficiently and effectively manage our business depends significantly on the reliability and capacity of these and other systems, and our operations depend substantially on the availability of our point-of-sale system and related networks and applications.

These systems may be vulnerable to attacks or outages from security breaches, viruses and other disruptive problems, as well as from physical theft, fire, power loss, telecommunications failure or other catastrophic events. Any failure of these systems to operate effectively, whether from security breaches, maintenance problems, upgrades or transitions to new platforms, or other factors could result in interruptions to or delays in our restaurant or other operations, adversely impacting the restaurant experience for our guests or negatively impacting our ability to manage our business. We plan major hardware upgrades and systems implementations during 2019 that will encompass all of our restaurants, which may increase the likelihood of a systems outage or malfunction negatively impacting our business.  If our information technology systems fail and our redundant systems or disaster recovery plans are not adequate to address such failures, or if our business interruption insurance does not sufficiently compensate us for any losses that we may incur, our revenues and profits could be reduced and the reputation of our brand and our business could be materially adversely affected. In addition, remediation of any problems with our systems could result in significant, unplanned expenses.

22

23


 

Table of Contents

 

Negative publicity relating to our restaurants or our company could adversely impact our reputation, which may significantly harm us.

We depend significantly on customers’consumers’ perception of and connection to our brand. In addition to the damage to our reputation from well-publicized food safety incidents during 2015 as described elsewhere in this report, we may experience negative publicity from time to time relating to food quality, customerguest complaints, restaurant facilities, advertising and other business practices, litigation alleging injuries or improper employee practices, government investigations or other regulatory issues, our suppliers’ potential failure to adhere to elements of our Food With Integrity protocols, other issues regarding the integrity of our suppliers’ food processing, employee relationships, customerguest or employee data breaches, or other matters, regardless of whether the allegations are valid or whether we are held to be responsible. The negative impact of adverse publicity relating to one or more restaurants or any of the foregoing topics may extend far beyond the restaurant(s) involved and affect many more, or even all, of our restaurants. The considerable expansion in the use of social media over recent years can further amplify any negative publicity that may be generated. A similar risk exists with respect to unrelated food service businesses, if consumers associate those businesses with our own operations. And even publicity that could reasonably be viewed as positive may have adverse consequences on our business.  For example, positive developments in regardsregard to the food safety issues that have impacted us might have the effect of continuing or increasing customerconsumer awareness of the issue.

The adverse impact of negative publicity on customers’consumers’ perception of us could have a further negative impact on our sales. If the impact of any such publicity is particularly long-lasting, the value of our brand may suffer and our ability to grow could be diminished. Additionally, negative publicity about our employment practices may affect our reputation among employees and potential employees, which could make it more difficult for us to attract and retain top performing employees. That could adversely impact the quality of the customerguest experience we can offer and our operations generally, and may increase our labor costs as well.

Our inability or failure to recognize, respond to and effectively manage the accelerated impact of social media could have a material adverse impact on our business.

There has been a widespread and dramatic increase in the use of social media platforms that allow users to access a broad audience of consumers and other interested persons.  The availability of information on social media can be virtually immediate, as can its impact, and users of many social media platforms can post information without filters or checks on the accuracy of the content posted.  Adverse information concerning our restaurants or brand, whether accurate or inaccurate, may be posted on such platforms at any time and can quickly reach a wide audience.  The resulting harm to our reputation may be immediate, without affording us an opportunity to correct or otherwise respond to the information, and it is challenging to monitor and anticipate developments on social media in order to respond in an effective and timely manner.  As a result, social media may exacerbate the risks described above under “—Negative publicity relating to our restaurants or our company could adversely impact our reputation, which may significantly harm us.

In addition, although search engine marketing, social media and other new technological platforms offer great opportunities to increase awareness of and engagement with our restaurants and brand, our failure to use social media effectively in our marketing efforts may further expose us to the risks associated with the accelerated impact of social media. Many of our competitors are expanding their use of social media and the social media landscape is rapidly evolving, potentially making more traditional social media platforms obsolete. As a result, we need to continuously innovate and develop our social media strategies in order to maintain broad appeal with guests and brand relevance, and we may not do so effectively.  A variety of additional risks associated with our use of social media include the possibility of improper disclosure of proprietary information, exposure of personally identifiable information of our employees or guests, fraud, or the publication of out-of-date information, any of which may result in material liabilities or reputational damage. Furthermore, any inappropriate use of social media platforms by our employees could also result in negative publicity that could damage our reputation, or lead to litigation that increases our costs.

Our insurance coverage and self-insurance reserves may not cover future claims.

We maintain various insurance policies for employee health, workers’ compensation, general liability, property damage and auto liability. We are self-insured for our employee health plans but have third party insurance coverage to limit exposure for both individual and aggregate claim costs. We are also responsible for losses up to a certain limit for workers’ compensation, general liability, property damage, employment practices liability and auto liability insurance. 

24


Table of Contents

For policies under which we are responsible for losses, we record a liability that represents our estimated cost of claims incurred and unpaid as of the balance sheet date. Our estimated liability is not discounted and is based on a number of assumptions and factors, including historical trends, actuarial assumptions and economic conditions, and is closely monitored and adjusted when warranted by changing circumstances. Our history of claims experience is relatively short and our significant growth during most of our operating history could affect the accuracy of estimates based on historical experience. If a greater amount of claims occurs compared to what we estimated, or if medical costs increase beyond what we expected, our accrued liabilities might not be sufficient and we may be required to record additional expense. Unanticipated changes may also produce materially different amounts of expense than reported under these programs, which could adversely impact our results of operations.  It is also possible that losses covered under one or more of our insurance policies may exceed the applicable policy limits, which would subject us to unexpected additional liabilities in an amount thatand any such uninsured losses could be significant enough to have a material adverse effect on our financial position.

We may not be able to adequately protect our intellectual property, which could harm the value of our brandsbrand and adversely affect our business.

Our ability to successfully implement our business plan depends in part on our ability to further build brand recognition using our trademarks, service marks, trade dress and other proprietary intellectual property, including our name and logos, our Food With Integrity strategy and the unique ambience of our restaurants. If our efforts to protect our intellectual property are inadequate, or if any third party misappropriates or infringes on our intellectual property, eitherwhether in print, or on the internet or in other media, the value of our brands may be harmed, which could have a material adverse effect on our business and might prevent our brands from achieving or maintaining market acceptance.business. We are aware of restaurants in foreign jurisdictions using menu items, logos and other branding that we believe are based on our intellectual property, and our ability to halt these restaurants from using these elements may be limited in jurisdictions in which we are not operating. This could have an adverse impact on our ability to successfully expand into other jurisdictions in the future. We may also encounter claims from prior users of similar intellectual property in areas where we operate or intend to conduct operations. This could harm our image, brand or competitive position and cause us to incur significant penalties and costs.

23


Table of Contents

Our quarterly results may fluctuate significantly and could fall below the expectations of securities analysts and investors due to various factors.

Our quarterly results may fluctuate significantly and could fail to meet the expectations of securities analysts and investors because of factors including:

changes in comparable restaurant sales and guest visits, including as a result of perceptions about our brand, competition, changes in consumer confidence or discretionary spending, and other factors listed in this “Risk Factors” section;

additional negative publicity about the occurrence of food-borne illnesses, the ingredients we use, or other problems at our restaurants whether as a result of actions within our control or those outside of our control such as those by our delivery partners;

fluctuations in supply costs, particularly for our most significant food items;

labor availability and wages of restaurant management and crew, as well as temporary fluctuations in labor costs as a result of operational changes or other factors;

increases in marketing or promotional expenses as we introduce new marketing programs and strategies, or increases pending on existing marketing programs in an effort to drive sales;

our ability to raise menu prices without adversely impacting guest traffic, particularly if food and labor costs were to increase;

the timing of new restaurant openings and related revenues and expenses;

operating costs at newly opened restaurants, which are often materially greater during the first several months of operation;

the impact of inclement weather, natural disasters and other calamities, such as freezes that have impacted produce crops and droughts that have impacted livestock and the supply of certain meats;

litigation, settlement costs and related legal expense;

tax expenses, impairment charges and non-operating costs;

variations in general economic conditions, including the impact of declining interest rates on our interest income;

increases in infrastructure costs; and

 

25


potential distraction or unusual expenses associated with our expansion into international markets or initiatives to expand new concepts.

changes in comparable restaurant sales and customer visits, including as a result of perceptions about our brand, competition, changes in consumer confidence or discretionary spending, and other factors listed in these Risk Factors;

additional negative publicity about the occurrence of food-borne illnesses, the ingredients we use, or other problems at our restaurants;

fluctuations in supply costs, particularly for our most significant food items, including increased ingredient costs as a result of changes we’ve made to enhance the safety of our food;

labor availability and wages of restaurant management and crew, as well as temporary fluctuations in labor costs as a result of large-scale changes in workforce;

increases in marketing or promotional expenses as we introduce new marketing programs and strategies, or increased spending on existing marketing programs in an effort to drive sales;

our ability to raise menu prices without adversely impacting customer traffic, particularly if food and labor costs were to increase;

the timing of new restaurant openings and related revenues and expenses;

operating costs at newly opened restaurants, which are often materially greater during the first several months of operation;

the impact of inclement weather, natural disasters and other calamities, such as freezes that have impacted produce crops and droughts that have impacted livestock and the supply of certain meats;

variations in general economic conditions, including the impact of declining interest rates on our interest income;

increases in infrastructure costs;

litigation, settlement costs and related legal expense;

tax expenses, impairment charges and non-operating costs; and

potential distraction or unusual expenses associated with our expansion into international markets or initiatives to expand new concepts.



Seasonal factors also cause our results to fluctuate from quarter to quarter. Our restaurant sales are typically lower during the winter months and the holiday season and during periods of inclement weather (because fewer people are eating out) and higher during the spring, summer and fall months (for the opposite reason). Our restaurant sales will also vary as a result of the number of trading days—that is, the number of days in a quarter when a restaurant is open.

As a result of these factors, results for any one quarter are not necessarily indicative of results to be expected for any other quarter or for any year. Average restaurant sales or comparable restaurant sales in any particular future period may decrease. In the future, operating results may fall below the expectations of securities analysts and investors, which could cause our stock price to fall. This risk may continue to be a greater concern during 2018,2019, as analyst and investor expectations for continued improvements in our business results may be higher than the level of results we actually achieve.

Additionally, we believe the market price of our common stock, which has generally traded at a higher price-earnings ratio than stocks of most or all of our peer companies, has typically reflected high market expectations for our future operating results. The trading market for our common stock has been volatile at times as well, including during the recent past as a result of adverse publicity events. As a result, if we fail to meet market expectations for our operating results in the future, any resulting decline in the price of our common stock could be significant.

Our anti-takeover provisions may delay or prevent a change in control of us, which could adversely affect the price of our common stock.stock.

Certain provisions in our corporate documents and Delaware law may delay or prevent a change in control of us, which could adversely affect the price of our common stock. Our amended and restated certificate of incorporation and amended and restated

24


Table of Contents

bylaws contain some provisions that may make the acquisition of control of us without the approval of our boardBoard of directorsDirectors more difficult, including provisions relating to the nomination, election and removal of directors, the structure of the boardBoard of directorsDirectors and limitations on actions by our shareholders. In addition, Delaware law also imposes some restrictions on mergers and other business combinations between us and any holder of 15% or more of our outstanding common stock. Any of these provisions may discourage a potential acquirer from proposing or completing a transaction that may have otherwise presented a premium to our shareholders.shareholders, which could adversely affect the price of our common stock.

ITEM 1B.UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS

None.

25

26


 

Table of Contents

 

ITEM 2.  PROPERTIES

As of December 31, 2017,2018, there were 2,4082,491 restaurants operated by Chipotle and our consolidated subsidiaries, 2,4002,489 of which were Chipotle restaurants. The table below sets forth the locations (by state or country) of all restaurants in operation.



 



 

Alabama

14 

Arizona

7980 

Arkansas

California

408412 

Colorado

7677 

Connecticut

2423 

Delaware

68 

District of Columbia

2019 

Florida

149160 

Georgia

4751 

Idaho

84 

Illinois

134139 

Indiana

36 

Iowa

1210 

Kansas

26 

Kentucky

18 

Louisiana

109 

Maine

Maryland

8491 

Massachusetts

5356 

Michigan

3536 

Minnesota

6263 

Missouri

38 

Mississippi

Montana

Nebraska

Nevada

27 

New Hampshire

78 

New Jersey

5764 

New Mexico

78 

New York

138149 

North Carolina

5462 

North Dakota

Ohio

174180 

Oklahoma

12 

Oregon

3031 

Pennsylvania

8286 

Rhode Island

78 

South Carolina

2220 

Tennessee

2022 

Texas

195205 

Utah

1211 

Vermont

Virginia

97101 

Washington

39 

West Virginia

Wisconsin

19 

Wyoming

21 

Canada

2423 

France

Germany

United Kingdom

67 

Total

2,4082,491 

26

27


 

Table of Contents

 

We categorize our restaurants as end-caps (at the end of a line of retail outlets), in-lines (in a line of retail outlets), free-standing, or other. Of our restaurants in operation as of December 31, 2017,2018, we had 1,5231,605 end-cap locations, 391398 free-standing units, 356348 in-line locations, and 138140 other locations. The average restaurant size is about 2,500 square feet and seats about 56 people. Many of our restaurants also feature outdoor patio space.space.  

Our main office is located at 1401 Wynkoop Street,610 Newport Center Drive, Suite 500, Denver, Colorado, 802021300, Newport Beach, CA 92660 and our telephone number is (303) 595-4000.(949) 524-4035. We lease our main office and substantially all of the properties on which we operate restaurants. For additional information regarding the lease terms and provisions, see Note 8.11. “Leases” in our consolidated financial statements included in Item 8. “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.”

We own 17 properties and operate restaurants on all of them.

 

ITEM 3.  LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

For information regarding legal proceedings, see Note 10.13. “Commitments and Contingencies” in our consolidated financial statements included in Item 8. “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.”

ITEM 4.  MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES

Not applicable.applicable.

 

27

28


 

Table of Contents

 

PART II

ITEM 5.MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY,STOCK, RELATED STOCKHOLDERSHAREHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES

The following table describes the per share range of high and low sales prices for shares of our common stock for the quarterly periods indicated, as reported by the New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”). Our common stock trades on the NYSENew York Stock Exchange under the symbol “CMG.”



 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 



High

 

Low

2016

 

 

 

 

 

First Quarter

$

542.50 

 

$

399.14 

Second Quarter

$

473.17 

 

$

384.77 

Third Quarter

$

444.13 

 

$

386.10 

Fourth Quarter

$

440.00 

 

$

352.96 



 

 

 

 

 



High

 

Low

2017

 

 

 

 

 

First Quarter

$

453.08 

 

$

372.87 

Second Quarter

$

499.00 

 

$

410.98 

Third Quarter

$

419.73 

 

$

295.11 

Fourth Quarter

$

333.33 

 

$

263.00 

As of February 1, 2018,January 24, 2019, there were approximately 948914 holders of our common stock, as determined by counting our record holders and the number of participants reflected in a security position listing provided to us by the Depository Trust Company. Because such “DTC participants” are brokers and other institutions holding shares of our common stock on behalf of their customers, we do not know the actual number of unique shareholders represented by these record holders.

Purchases of Equity Securities by the Issuer

The table below reflects shares of common stock we repurchased during the fourth quarter of 2017.2018.



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total Number of Shares Purchased

 

Average Price Paid Per Share

 

Total Number of Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans or Programs(1)

 

Approximate Dollar Value of Shares that May Yet Be Purchased Under the Plans or Programs(2)

 

 

Total Number of Shares Purchased

 

Average Price Paid Per Share

 

Total Number of Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans or Programs(1)

 

Approximate Dollar Value of Shares that May Yet Be Purchased Under the Plans or Programs(2)

October

 

 

81,953 

 

$

303.31 

 

81,953 

 

$

170,567,974 

 

 

8,705 

 

$

446.07 

 

8,705 

 

$

99,100,835 

Purchased 10/1 through 10/31

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Purchased 10/1 through 10/31

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

November

 

 

91,427 

 

$

279.97 

 

91,427 

 

$

144,971,147 

 

 

37,178 

 

$

475.95 

 

37,178 

 

$

81,405,932 

Purchased 11/1 through 11/30

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Purchased 11/1 through 11/30

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

December

 

 

86,775 

 

$

307.66 

 

86,775 

 

$

118,274,235 

 

 

54,715 

 

$

435.98 

 

54,715 

 

$

57,551,285 

Purchased 12/1 through 12/31

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Purchased 12/1 through 12/31

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total

 

 

260,155 

 

$

296.56 

 

260,155 

 

$

118,274,235 

 

 

100,598 

 

$

451.62 

 

100,598 

 

$

57,551,285 

__________________

(1)

Shares were repurchased pursuant to the $100 million repurchase programs announced on October 24, 2017 and April 25, 2018.

(2)

This column does not include an additional $100 million in authorized repurchases announced on February 6, 2019. Each repurchase program has no expiration date. Authorization of repurchase programs may be modified, suspended or discontinued at any time.   



(1)Shares were repurchased pursuant to a $100 million repurchase program announced on May 23, 2017.

(2)This column includes $100 million in additional authorized repurchases announced on October 24, 2017.  Our authorized repurchase programs have no expiration date, but may be modified, suspended, or discontinued at any time.  

Dividend Policy

We are not required to pay any dividends and have not declared or paid any cash dividends on our common stock. We intend to continue to retain earnings for use in the operation and expansion of our business and to repurchase shares of common stock (subject to market conditions), and therefore do not anticipate paying any cash dividends on our common stock in the foreseeable future.

28

29


 

Table of Contents

 

COMPARISON OF CUMULATIVE TOTAL RETURN

The following graph compares the cumulative annual stockholders return on our common stock from December 31, 20122013 through December 31, 20172018 to that of the total return index for the S&P 500 and the S&P 500 Restaurants Index assuming an investment of $100 on December 31, 2012.2013. In calculating total annual stockholder return, reinvestment of dividends, if any, is assumed. The indices are included for comparative purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect management’s opinion that such indices are an appropriate measure of the relative performance of our common stock. This graph is not “soliciting material,” is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is not to be incorporated by reference in any of our filings under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act, of 1934, as amended, whether made before or after the date hereof and irrespective of any general incorporation language in any such filing.

Picture 1

*$100 invested on 12/31/13 in stock or index, including reinvestment of dividends.

Fiscal year ending December 31.

Source data:  S&P Capital IQ

 

29

30


 

Table of Contents

 

ITEM 6.  SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA

Our selected consolidated financial data shown below should be read together with Item 7. “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and our consolidated financial statements and respective notes included in Item 8. “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.” The data shown below are not necessarily indicative of results to be expected for any future period (dollar and share amounts in thousands, except per share data).



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

Year ended December 31,



2018

 

2017

 

2016

 

2015

 

2014

Statement of Income:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Revenue

$

4,864,985 

 

$

4,476,412 

 

$

3,904,384 

 

$

4,501,223 

 

$

4,108,269 

Food, beverage and packaging costs

 

1,600,760 

 

 

1,535,428 

 

 

1,365,580 

 

 

1,503,835 

 

 

1,420,994 

Labor costs

 

1,326,079 

 

 

1,205,992 

 

 

1,105,001 

 

 

1,045,726 

 

 

904,407 

Occupancy costs

 

347,123 

 

 

327,132 

 

 

293,636 

 

 

262,412 

 

 

230,868 

Other operating costs

 

680,031 

 

 

651,644 

 

 

641,953 

 

 

514,963 

 

 

434,244 

General and administrative expenses

 

375,460 

 

 

296,388 

 

 

276,240 

 

 

250,214 

 

 

273,897 

Depreciation and amortization

 

201,979 

 

 

163,348 

 

 

146,368 

 

 

130,368 

 

 

110,474 

Pre-opening costs

 

8,546 

 

 

12,341 

 

 

17,162 

 

 

16,922 

 

 

15,609 

Loss on disposal of assets

 

66,639 

 

 

13,345 

 

 

23,877 

 

 

13,194 

 

 

6,976 

Total operating expenses

 

4,606,617 

 

 

4,205,618 

 

 

3,869,817 

 

 

3,737,634 

 

 

3,397,469 

Income from operations

 

258,368 

 

 

270,794 

 

 

34,567 

 

 

763,589 

 

 

710,800 

Interest and other income, net

 

10,068 

 

 

4,949 

 

 

4,172 

 

 

6,278 

 

 

3,503 

Income before income taxes

 

268,436 

 

 

275,743 

 

 

38,739 

 

 

769,867 

 

 

714,303 

Provision for income taxes

 

(91,883)

 

 

(99,490)

 

 

(15,801)

 

 

(294,265)

 

 

(268,929)

Net income

$

176,553 

 

$

176,253 

 

$

22,938 

 

$

475,602 

 

$

445,374 

Earnings per share

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Basic

$

6.35 

 

$

6.19 

 

$

0.78 

 

$

15.30 

 

$

14.35 

Diluted

$

6.31 

 

$

6.17 

 

$

0.77 

 

$

15.10 

 

$

14.13 

Weighted average common shares outstanding

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Basic

 

27,823 

 

 

28,491 

 

 

29,265 

 

 

31,092 

 

 

31,038 

Diluted

 

27,962 

 

 

28,561 

 

 

29,770 

 

 

31,494 

 

 

31,512 



 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

December 31,



2018

 

2017

 

2016

 

2015

 

2014

Balance Sheet Data:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total current assets

$

814,794 

 

$

629,535 

 

$

522,374 

 

$

814,647 

 

$

859,511 

Total assets

$

2,265,518 

 

$

2,045,692 

 

$

2,026,103 

 

$

2,725,066 

 

$

2,527,317 

Total current liabilities

$

449,990 

 

$

323,893 

 

$

281,793 

 

$

279,942 

 

$

245,710 

Total liabilities

$

824,179 

 

$

681,247 

 

$

623,610 

 

$

597,092 

 

$

514,948 

Total shareholders’ equity

$

1,441,339 

 

$

1,364,445 

 

$

1,402,493 

 

$

2,127,974 

 

$

2,012,369 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

Year ended December 31,



2017

 

2016

 

2015

 

2014

 

2013

Statement of Income:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Revenue

$

4,476,412 

 

$

3,904,384 

 

$

4,501,223 

 

$

4,108,269 

 

$

3,214,591 

Food, beverage and packaging costs

 

1,535,428 

 

 

1,365,580 

 

 

1,503,835 

 

 

1,420,994 

 

 

1,073,514 

Labor costs

 

1,205,992 

 

 

1,105,001 

 

 

1,045,726 

 

 

904,407 

 

 

739,800 

Occupancy costs

 

327,132 

 

 

293,636 

 

 

262,412 

 

 

230,868 

 

 

199,107 

Other operating costs

 

651,644 

 

 

641,953 

 

 

514,963 

 

 

434,244 

 

 

347,401 

General and administrative expenses

 

296,388 

 

 

276,240 

 

 

250,214 

 

 

273,897 

 

 

203,733 

Depreciation and amortization

 

163,348 

 

 

146,368 

 

 

130,368 

 

 

110,474 

 

 

96,054 

Pre-opening costs

 

12,341 

 

 

17,162 

 

 

16,922 

 

 

15,609 

 

 

15,511 

Loss on disposal of assets

 

13,345 

 

 

23,877 

 

 

13,194 

 

 

6,976 

 

 

6,751 

Total operating expenses

 

4,205,618 

 

 

3,869,817 

 

 

3,737,634 

 

 

3,397,469 

 

 

2,681,871 

Income from operations

 

270,794 

 

 

34,567 

 

 

763,589 

 

 

710,800 

 

 

532,720 

Interest and other income, net

 

4,949 

 

 

4,172 

 

 

6,278 

 

 

3,503 

 

 

1,751 

Income before income taxes

 

275,743 

 

 

38,739 

 

 

769,867 

 

 

714,303 

 

 

534,471 

Provision for income taxes

 

(99,490)

 

 

(15,801)

 

 

(294,265)

 

 

(268,929)

 

 

(207,033)

Net income

$

176,253 

 

$

22,938 

 

$

475,602 

 

$

445,374 

 

$

327,438 

Earnings per share

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Basic

$

6.19 

 

$

0.78 

 

$

15.30 

 

$

14.35 

 

$

10.58 

Diluted

$

6.17 

 

$

0.77 

 

$

15.10 

 

$

14.13 

 

$

10.47 

Weighted average common shares outstanding

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Basic

 

28,491 

 

 

29,265 

 

 

31,092 

 

 

31,038 

 

 

30,957 

Diluted

 

28,561 

 

 

29,770 

 

 

31,494 

 

 

31,512 

 

 

31,281 



 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

December 31,



2017

 

2016

 

2015

 

2014

 

2013

Balance Sheet Data:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total current assets

$

629,535 

 

$

522,374 

 

$

814,647 

 

$

859,511 

 

$

653,095 

Total assets

$

2,045,692 

 

$

2,026,103 

 

$

2,725,066 

 

$

2,527,317 

 

$

1,996,068 

Total current liabilities

$

323,893 

 

$

281,793 

 

$

279,942 

 

$

245,710 

 

$

199,228 

Total liabilities

$

681,247 

 

$

623,610 

 

$

597,092 

 

$

514,948 

 

$

457,780 

Total shareholders’ equity

$

1,364,445 

 

$

1,402,493 

 

$

2,127,974 

 

$

2,012,369 

 

$

1,538,288 

30

31


 

Table of Contents

 

ITEM 7.  MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

You should read the following discussion together with Item 6. “Selected Financial Data” and our consolidated financial statements and related notes included in Item 8. “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.” The discussion contains forward-looking statements involving risks, uncertainties and assumptions that could cause our results to differ materially from expectations. See “Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements.” Factors that might cause such differences include those described in Item 1A. “Risk Factors” and elsewhere in this report.

Overview

Steve Ells,As of December 31, 2018, we operated 2,452 Chipotle restaurants throughout the United States, 37 international Chipotle restaurants, and two non-Chipotle restaurants. We are committed to making our founder, Chairman and CEO, started Chipotle with the idea that food served fast did not havemore accessible to everyone while continuing to be a typical fast food experience. Today, we continue to offer a focused menu of burritos, tacos, burrito bowls, and salads made from fresh, high-quality raw ingredients, prepared using classic cooking methods and served in an interactive style allowing people to get what they want. We seek out extraordinary ingredients that are not only fresh, but that are raised responsibly, with respect for the animals, land, and people who produce them. We prepare our food using real, wholesome ingredients and without the use of artificial colors or flavors typically found in fast food. Chipotle openedbrand with a single restaurant in Denver in 1993demonstrated purpose.

2018 Financial and as of December 31, 2017, we operated 2,408 restaurants.Operational Highlights

Sales. Our sales and profitability improved during 2017 as compared to 2016. Comparable restaurant sales increased 6.4% as a result of an increase in the average check, including a 1.2% benefit from menu price increases implemented in about 500 restaurants during the second quarter of 2017 and 900 restaurants during the fourth quarter of 2017. Comparable restaurant sales represent the change in period-over-period sales for restaurants beginning in their 13th full calendar month of operation.Sales Trends. Average restaurant sales were $2.004 million for the year ended December 31, 2018, an increase from $1.940 million as offor the year ended December 31, 2017, increasing from $1.868 million as of December 31, 2016.30, 2017. We define average restaurant sales as the average trailing 12-month sales for restaurants in operation for at least 12 full calendar months.We expect comparable

Comparable restaurant sales increases in the low single digitsincreased 4.0% for the full year 2018 includingand increased 6.1%, which included a 2% increase in comparable restaurant transactions, for the benefit from extending menu pricethree months ended December 31, 2018. Comparable restaurant sales and comparable restaurant transactions represent the change in period-over-period sales or paid transactions for restaurants in operation for at least 13 full calendar months. We expect our full year 2019 comparable restaurant sales increases to almost 950 additional restaurants in January 2018.  Sales growth from new restaurant openings, however, will be lower in 2018 than in the past duemid-single digit range.

We continue to our planned decrease in new restaurant openings during the year, as discussed below under “Restaurant Development.”

During 2017, we investedinvest in improving our digital platforms including significant improvements to our mobile application and online ordering platform, and equipping select restaurants with an upgraded second make line dedicated to fulfilling out-of-restaurant orders. Sales from out-of-restaurant orders, representedincluding delivery orders, increased 260 basis points to 10.9% of revenue for the full year 2018, an increase from 8.3% of our revenue duringfor the full year ended December 31, 2017, up from 6.4% of revenue during the year ended December 31, 2016. Additionally, in September 2017 we introduced an all-natural queso, which was ordered in approximately 10% of our transactions in January 2018. 2017.

Restaurant Operating CostsCosts..  During the full year 2017,2018, our restaurant operating costs (food, beverage and packaging; labor; occupancy; and other operating costs) as a percentpercentage of revenue decreased 4.1%180 basis points to 81.3% compared to the full year 2016.2017. The decrease was attributableprimarily due to comparable restaurant sales leverage, including the benefit of the menu price increases combined with lower marketing and promotional spend as a percent of revenue, and labor efficiencies,expenses, partially offset by higher wages paid towage inflation at the crew and managers.level.

Restaurant DevelopmentCorporate Restructuring. . As of December 31, 2017,During 2018, we had 2,408 restaurantsopened a new headquarters office in operation, including 2,363 Chipotle restaurants throughout the United States, with an additional 37 international Chipotle restaurants and eight non-Chipotle restaurants that wereNewport Beach, California, consolidated certain corporate administrative functions into our financial results.  We opened 183 restaurantsexisting office in 2017, including two relocations,Columbus, Ohio, closed a corporate office in New York, New York, and closed 23 additional restaurants (including 15 ShopHouse Southeast Asian Kitchen restaurants). We intend to open between 130 and 150 restaurants forcommenced the full year 2018, as we focus our resources on improving our operations and delivering an outstanding experience to every oneclosure of our guests. Mostprevious headquarters office in Denver, Colorado. All affected employees were either offered an opportunity to continue in the new organization or were offered a severance package. We expect to incur total corporate restructuring costs, including costs already incurred, aggregating approximately $48 million to $58 million including (i) employee severance and other employee transition costs of our 2018 restaurant openings are planned in markets that already have a Chipotle presence established.

Tax Law Changes.  In December 2017, the Tax Cutsapproximately $8 million to $10 million; (ii) recruitment and Jobs Act was signed into law,relocation costs of approximately $12 million to $14 million; (iii) lease termination and among other changes, the Act lowered the U.S. corporate income tax rate from 35%office closure costs of approximately $17 million to 21% beginning in 2018.  As a result, we$22 million; and (iv) third-party and other costs of approximately $11 million to $12 million. We recognized a $6.0total of $42.6 million benefitof the foregoing costs during 2018, and expect to incur additional corporate restructuring costs into 2019 aggregating approximately $5 million to $15 million. For additional information, please see Note 5. “Corporate Restructuring Costs” in our provision for income taxes relatedthe notes to the remeasurement of our deferred tax position at the lower rate.

We expect our 2018 annual effective tax rate to be in the range of 30% to 31%, which includes an underlying effective tax rate of 27% to 28%, and around 3% to 4% related to stock awards. As discussed in Note 1. “Description of Business and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies” consolidated financial statements included in Item 8. “Financial Statements and Supplementary Datathe adoption of ASU No. 2016-09, “Compensation-Stock Compensation (Topic 718) will subject our tax rate to quarterly volatility from the effect of stock award exercise and vesting activities. Additionally, we have deferred tax assets relatedas well as “Risks Unique to outstanding non-vested stock awards that contain market conditions. If market conditions are not achieved, then we may not realize the benefit of these deferred tax assets, which would result in a higher effective tax rate in future periods.  We believe the stock awards granted in 2015 and 2016 that contain market conditionsOur Business StrategyOur restructuring activities will increase our tax rateexpenses, may not be successful, and may adversely impact employee hiring and retention” in Item 1A. “Risk Factors”.

Restaurant Closures.  In June 2018, we announced planned restaurant closures of approximately 55 to 65 restaurants beginning in the first and fourth quarterssecond quarter of 2018 respectively.and continuing over the next several quarters.  During the twelve months ended December 31, 2018, we closed or relocated 45 Chipotle restaurants and five Pizzeria Locale restaurants in connection with this initiative. We expect to incur total restaurant exit costs, inclusive of costs already incurred, aggregating approximately $37 million to $43 million. We recognized restaurant exit costs of approximately $35.8 million during 2018, and expect to incur additional restaurant exit costs into 2019 aggregating approximately $1 million to $7 million. For additional information, please see Note 6. “Restaurant Closure Costs and Impairment of Long-Lived Assets” in the notes to the consolidated financial statements included in Item 8. “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data, as well as “Risks Unique to Our Business StrategyOur restructuring activities will increase our expenses, may not be successful, and may adversely impact employee hiring and retention” in Item 1A. “Risk Factors”.   

Restaurant Development. For the full year 2018, we opened 137 new restaurants. We expect 2019 openings will be approximately 140 to 155 with a heavier weighting of openings towards the second half of the year.

31

32


 

Table of Contents

 

During 2018, we expect to useManagement Enhancements. Brian Niccol joined us as Chief Executive Officer and as a portionmember of the savings from the lower federal corporate income tax rate to provide enhanced benefits toBoard in March 2018; added a new Chief Marketing Officer, Chris Brandt and our employees, including by making all restaurant managers and crew eligible for a one-time cash bonus, awarding one-time stock bonuses to a broad group of staff employees, and enhancing a number of other benefits such as parental leave and short-term disability.  Additionally, we will use a portion of the savings by investingfirst Chief People Officer, Marissa Andrada, in April 2018; added our existing restaurants.  We expect these initiatives to increase labor, other operating, and general and administrative expenses, and to result in higher capital expenditures than we have typically incurred.    

Management and Governance. During the second quarter of 2017, we announced that we hired Scott Boatwright asfirst Chief RestaurantLegal Officer and Scott has assumed oversight of operations for all North American Chipotle restaurants. In the fourth quarter of 2017, we announced that Steve Ells, our ChairmanGeneral Counsel, Roger Theodoredis, in October 2018; and CEO, will become Executive Chairman following the completion of a search to identifyadded a new CEO.  For risks associated with our planned installation of a new CEO, see “Risks Related to our Unique Business Strategy –Our success may depend on the continued service and availability of key personnel, and upcoming changesChief Development Officer, Tabassum Zalotrawala in our management team may not provide the benefits we expect” in Item 1A. “Risk Factors.”December 2018. 

Data Security Incident.  In April 2017, we detected malware on the network that supports payment processing for our restaurants, and subsequently determined that the malware searched for track data, which may include cardholder name, card number, expiration date, and internal verification codes. We removed the malware from our systems and continue to evaluate ways to enhance our security measures.See “General Business RisksWe may be harmed by security risks we face in connection with our electronic processing and transmission of confidential customer and employee information” in Item 1A. “Risk Factors,” as well as Note 10. “Commitments and Contingencies” in Item 8. “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data,” for further discussion of the payment card security incident and related legal proceedings.

During the year ended December 31, 2017, we recorded a liability of $30.0 million ($18.2 million after tax), or $0.64 per basic and diluted earnings per share, as an estimate of potential losses associated with anticipated claims and assessments by payment card networks.  We may ultimately be subject to liabilities greater or less than the amount accrued.  

Restaurant Openings, Relocations and Closures

The following table details restaurant unit data for the years indicated.



 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 



Year ended December 31,



2018

 

2017

 

2016

Beginning of period

2,408 

 

2,250 

 

2,010 

Openings

137 

 

183 

 

243 

Chipotle closures/relocations

(48)

 

(10)

 

(3)

TastyMade closures

(1)

 

 -

 

 -

ShopHouse closures

 -

 

(15)

 

 -

Pizzeria Locale closures

(5)

 

 -

 

 -

Total restaurants at end of period

2,491 

 

2,408 

 

2,250 





 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 



Year ended December 31,



2017

 

2016

 

2015

Beginning of period

2,250 

 

2,010 

 

1,783 

Openings

183 

 

243 

 

229 

Relocations/closures

(10)

 

(3)

 

(2)

ShopHouse closures

(15)

 

 -

 

 

Total restaurants at end of period

2,408 

 

2,250 

 

2,010 

Results of Operations

Our results of operations as a percentage of revenue and period-over-period variances are discussed in the following section. As we open more restaurants and hire more employees, our aggregate restaurant operating costs and depreciation and amortization generally increase.

Revenue



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



Year ended December 31,

 

% increase

 

% increase/ (decrease)



2017

 

2016

 

2015

 

2017 over 2016

 

2016 over 2015



(dollars in millions)

 

 

 

 

Revenue

$

4,476.4 

 

$

3,904.4 

 

$

4,501.2 

 

14.7% 

 

(13.3%)

Average restaurant sales

$

1.940 

 

$

1.868 

 

$

2.424 

 

3.9% 

 

(22.9%)

Comparable restaurant sales increases (decreases)

 

6.4% 

 

 

(20.4%)

 

 

0.2% 

 

 

 

 

Number of restaurants as of the end of the year

 

2,408 

 

 

2,250 

 

 

2,010 

 

7.0% 

 

11.9% 

Number of restaurants opened in the year

 

183 

 

 

243 

 

 

229 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



Year ended December 31,

 

Percentage Change



2018

 

2017

 

2016

 

2018/2017

 

2017/2016



(dollars in millions)

 

 

 

 

Revenue

$

4,865.0 

 

$

4,476.4 

 

$

3,904.4 

 

8.7% 

 

14.7% 

Average restaurant sales

$

2.004 

 

$

1.940 

 

$

1.868 

 

3.3% 

 

3.9% 

Comparable restaurant sales increases

 

4.0% 

 

 

6.4% 

 

 

(20.4%)

 

 

 

 

32




TableThe significant factors contributing to the increase in revenue in 2018 were new restaurant openings and comparable restaurant sales increases. Revenue from restaurants not yet in the comparable restaurant base contributed $237.4 million to the revenue increase, of Contentswhich $112.1 million was attributable to restaurants opened in 2018, and comparable restaurant sales increased $151.2 million. The increase in comparable restaurant sales was attributable to an increase in average check, including a 4.0% benefit from menu price increases, partially offset by 0.8% fewer comparable restaurant transactions.

The significant factors contributing to the increase in revenue in 2017 were new restaurant openings and comparable restaurant sales increases.increases and new restaurant openings. Revenue from restaurants not yet in the comparable restaurant base contributed $338.8 million to the revenue increase, of which $149.1 million was attributable to restaurants opened in 2017, and comparable restaurant sales increased $233.2 million. The increase in comparable restaurant sales was attributable to an increase in average check, including a 1.2% benefit from menu price increases.

In 2016,  the decrease in revenue was attributable to a decline in comparable restaurant sales, which we attribute primarily to the impact of food safety incidents beginning in late 2015, partially offset by new restaurant openings. Comparable restaurant sales decreased $914.7 million while revenue from restaurants not yet in the comparable restaurant base contributed $323.9 million, of which $156.2 million was attributable to restaurants opened in 2016.   

Food, Beverage and Packaging Costs  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Year ended December 31,

 

% increase

 

% decrease

Year ended December 31,

 

Percentage Change

2017

 

2016

 

2015

 

2017 over 2016

 

2016 over 2015

2018

 

2017

 

2016

 

2018/2017

 

2017/2016

(dollars in millions)

 

 

 

 

(dollars in millions)

 

 

 

 

Food, beverage and packaging

$

1,535.4 

 

$

1,365.6 

 

$

1,503.8 

 

12.4% 

 

(9.2%)

$

1,600.8 

 

$

1,535.4 

 

$

1,365.6 

 

4.3% 

 

12.4% 

As a percentage of revenue

 

34.3% 

 

35.0% 

 

33.4% 

 

 

 

 

 

32.9% 

 

34.3% 

 

35.0% 

 

(1.4%)

 

(0.7%)

Food, beverage and packaging costs decreased as a percentage of revenue in 2018 primarily due to the benefit of menu price increases taken in select restaurants in 2017 and again at the end of 2018. Food, beverage and packaging costs also benefitted from favorable avocado prices. These decreases were partially offset by increased freight costs, and to a lesser extent increased costs for tortillas and rice.

33


Table of Contents

Food, beverage and packaging costs decreased as a percentage of revenue in 2017 primarily due to the benefit of the menu price increases taken in select restaurants during the second and fourth quarters of 2017. Food, beverage and packaging costs also benefitted from bringing the preparation of lettuce and bell peppers back into our restaurants after using pre-cut produce during portions of 2016, and cost savings initiatives resulting in lower prices and usage of paper and packaging products. These decreases were partially offset by higher avocado prices. We expect food, beverage and packaging costs as a percentage of revenue in 2018 to be lower than 2017 due to the benefit of menu price increases, and our expectations for stable commodity prices.

Food, beverage and packagingLabor Costs



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



Year ended December 31,

 

Percentage Change



2018

 

2017

 

2016

 

2018/2017

 

2017/2016



(dollars in millions)

 

 

 

 

Labor costs

$

1,326.1 

 

$

1,206.0 

 

$

1,105.0 

 

10.0% 

 

9.1% 

As a percentage of revenue

 

27.3% 

 

 

26.9% 

 

 

28.3% 

 

0.3% 

 

(1.4%)

Labor costs increased as a percentage of revenue in 20162018 primarily due to increased waste and costs related to new food safety procedures as well as higher avocado prices,an increase in wage inflation. The increase was partially offset by reliefsales leverage as our revenues increased 8.7% in beef prices.  In dollar terms, food, beverage and packaging costs decreased in 2016 due to lower sales. 2018, which included the benefit of menu price increases.

Labor Costs



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



Year ended December 31,

 

% increase

 

% increase



2017

 

2016

 

2015

 

2017 over 2016

 

2016 over 2015



(dollars in millions)

 

 

 

 

Labor costs

$

1,206.0 

 

$

1,105.0 

 

$

1,045.7 

 

9.1% 

 

5.7% 

As a percentage of revenue

 

26.9% 

 

 

28.3% 

 

 

23.2% 

 

 

 

 

Labor costs as a percentage of revenue decreased during the year ended December 31, 2017 due primarily to increased crew efficiency, including the benefit of lower promotional activity during the year, improved manager deployment, and sales leverage, including the impact of menu price increases. The decrease was partially offset by wage inflation.   We expect labor costs as a percentage of revenue to be higher in 2018 than 2017 due to labor inflation and the enhanced benefits described above under “Overview – Tax Law Changes.”

Labor costs as a percentage of revenue increased in 2016 due primarily to sales deleveraging and wage inflation, partially offset by labor efficiencies resulting from fewer managers and crew in each of our restaurants.  Labor costs increased in dollar terms for the year ended December 31, 2016 due to staffing needs for new restaurants.    

Occupancy Costs  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Year ended December 31,

 

% increase

 

% increase

Year ended December 31,

 

Percentage Change

2017

 

2016

 

2015

 

2017 over 2016

 

2016 over 2015

2018

 

2017

 

2016

 

2018/2017

 

2017/2016

(dollars in millions)

 

 

 

 

(dollars in millions)

 

 

 

 

Occupancy costs

$

327.1 

 

$

293.6 

 

$

262.4 

 

11.4% 

 

11.9% 

$

347.1 

 

$

327.1 

 

$

293.6 

 

6.1% 

 

11.4% 

As a percentage of revenue

 

7.3% 

 

7.5% 

 

5.8% 

 

 

 

 

 

7.1% 

 

7.3% 

 

7.5% 

 

(0.2%)

 

(0.2%)

Occupancy costs as a percentage of revenue decreased in 2018 and 2017 primarily due to sales leverage on a largely fixed-cost base.

33


Table of Contents

Occupancy costs as a percentage of revenue increased in 2016 primarily due to lower average restaurant sales on a largely fixed-cost base. Occupancy costs increased in dollar terms for the year ended December  31, 2016, primarily due to costs associated with new restaurants.

Other Operating Costs  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Year ended December 31,

 

% increase

 

% increase

Year ended December 31,

 

Percentage Change

2017

 

2016

 

2015

 

2017 over 2016

 

2016 over 2015

2018

 

2017

 

2016

 

2018/2017

 

2017/2016

(dollars in millions)

 

 

 

 

(dollars in millions)

 

 

 

 

Other operating costs

$

651.6 

 

$

642.0 

 

$

515.0 

 

1.5% 

 

24.7% 

$

680.0 

 

$

651.6 

 

$

642.0 

 

4.4% 

 

1.5% 

As a percentage of revenue

 

14.6% 

 

16.4% 

 

11.4% 

 

 

 

 

 

14.0% 

 

14.6% 

 

16.4% 

 

(0.6%)

 

(1.9%)

Other operating costs include, among other items, marketing and promotional costs, bank and credit card processing fees, and restaurant utilities and maintenance costs. Other operating costs decreased as a percentage of revenue in 2018 due primarily to sales leverage, including the benefit of menu price increases, and to a lesser extent marketing and promotional spend decreasing from 3.5% of revenue in 2017 to 2.9% of revenue in 2018. This is partially offset by increased costs associated with store repairs and maintenance, and delivery.

Other operating costs decreased as a percentage of revenue in 2017 due primarily to decreased marketing and promotional spend, sales leverage including the benefit of menu price increases, and decreased kitchen supplies expense. Marketing and promotional spend decreased to 3.5% of revenue in 2017, as compared to 5.1% of revenue in 2016.  We expect other operating costs as a percentage of revenue in 2018 to remain consistent with 2017 as planned lower marketing and promotional spend is offset by expected higher maintenance costs from investments in our existing restaurants.

Other operating costs increased as a percentage of revenue in 2016 due primarily to higher marketing and promotional expense as well as sales deleveraging. We increased our marketing and promotional spend in an effort to regain customers, which contributed $98.2 million to the increase.

General and Administrative Expenses  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Year ended December 31,

 

% increase

 

% increase

Year ended December 31,

 

Percentage Change

2017

 

2016

 

2015

 

2017 over 2016

 

2016 over 2015

2018

 

2017

 

2016

 

2018/2017

 

2017/2016

(dollars in millions)

 

 

 

 

(dollars in millions)

 

 

 

 

General and administrative expense

$

296.4 

 

$

276.2 

 

$

250.2 

 

7.3% 

 

10.4% 

$

375.5 

 

$

296.4 

 

$

276.2 

 

26.7% 

 

7.3% 

As a percentage of revenue

 

6.6% 

 

7.1% 

 

5.6% 

 

 

 

 

 

7.7% 

 

6.6% 

 

7.1% 

 

1.1% 

 

(0.5%)

34


Table of Contents

General and administrative expenses increased in dollar terms in 2018, due to $32.1 million related to the corporate restructuring and other unusual charges, $21.4 million related to higher costs associated with our annual incentive cash bonus program and retention bonuses, $10.9 million associated with the biennial All Managers’ Conference that was held in September 2018, $3.8 million in higher stock compensation expense, and the remaining increase primarily relates to general and administrative growth to support our restaurant growth and digitizing our restaurant experience. These increases were partially offset by the benefit of comparing against a non-recurring charge of $30.0 million recorded in the third quarter of 2017 related to the data security incident in the second quarter of 2017. 

General and administrative expenses increased in dollar terms in 2017, due to recording athe liability of $30.0 million as an estimate of potential losses associated with anticipated claims and assessments by payment card networks for the data security incident that occurred in 2017. Increased2017, increased bonus costs and higher non-cash stock-based compensation expense also contributed to the increase.of $11.8 million. The increase was partially offset by lowera decrease of $10.5 million in legal costs,expenses, and decreased meeting costs of $9.1 million primarily because of the biennial All Managers Conference held in September 2016. The increase in stock-based compensation expense during 2017 was primarily a result of a cumulative reduction of expense in 2016 for performance share awards that were no longer expected to vest. We expect that general and administrative expenses will increase in dollar terms in 2018 due to increased wages and benefits, the biennial All Managers’ Conference planned for the third quarter of 2018, and an increase in stock-based compensation expense.

The increase in general and administrative expenses in dollar terms for 2016 primarily resulted from increased legal expense, higher payroll costs as we grew, and expenses associated with our biennial All Managers’ Conference held during 2016, partially offset by lower bonus expense and travel costs. 

Depreciation and Amortization  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Year ended December 31,

 

% increase

 

% increase

Year ended December 31,

 

Percentage Change

2017

 

2016

 

2015

 

2017 over 2016

 

2016 over 2015

2018

 

2017

 

2016

 

2018/2017

 

2017/2016

(dollars in millions)

 

 

 

 

(dollars in millions)

 

 

 

 

Depreciation and amortization

$

163.3 

 

$

146.4 

 

$

130.4 

 

11.6% 

 

12.3% 

$

202.0 

 

$

163.3 

 

$

146.4 

 

23.6% 

 

11.6% 

As a percentage of revenue

 

3.6% 

 

3.7% 

 

2.9% 

 

 

 

 

 

4.2% 

 

3.6% 

 

3.7% 

 

0.5% 

 

(0.1%)

Depreciation and amortization increased as a percentage of revenue in 2018 due primarily to accelerated depreciation on certain restaurant assets in connection with a large restaurant refresh project and from the restaurant closures described above under “2018 Financial and Operating Highlights—Restaurant Closures.”

Depreciation and amortization decreased as a percentage of revenue in 2017 due to sales leverage on a partially fixed-cost base.

Depreciation and amortization increased as a percentage of revenue in 2016 due to sales deleveraging.    The increase in dollar terms was due primarily to depreciation and amortization costs associated with new restaurants. 

34


Table of Contents

Loss on Disposal and Impairment of Assets

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Year ended December 31,

 

% decrease

 

% increase

Year ended December 31,

 

Percentage Change

2017

 

2016

 

2015

 

2017 over 2016

 

2016 over 2015

2018

 

2017

 

2016

 

2018/2017

 

2017/2016

(dollars in millions)

 

 

 

 

(dollars in millions)

 

 

 

 

Loss on disposal and impairment of assets

$

13.3 

 

$

23.9 

 

$

13.2 

 

(44.1%)

 

81.0% 

Impairment, closure costs, and asset disposals

$

66.6 

 

$

13.3 

 

$

23.9 

 

399.4% 

 

(44.1%)

As a percentage of revenue

 

0.3% 

 

0.6% 

 

0.3% 

 

 

 

 

 

1.4% 

 

0.3% 

 

0.6% 

 

1.1% 

 

(0.3%)

Loss on disposal

Impairment, closure costs, and impairmentasset disposals increased in dollar terms in 2018 primarily due to the planned closures of assetsunderperforming restaurants that began in the second quarter of 2018, offices affected by corporate restructuring, and the write down of a large portion of the associated long-lived asset values, which are discussed above under “2018 Financial and Operational Highlights—Corporate Restructuring” and “—Restaurant Closures.”

Impairment, closure costs, and asset disposals during the year ended December 31, 2017 consisted primarily of charges related to the closure of underperforming Chipotle restaurants and the replacement of certain kitchen equipment.

Loss on disposal and impairment of assets increased in 2016 primarilyThis was a decrease from the prior year due to a non-cash impairment chargethe closing of $14.5 million to write-down substantially all of the value of the long-lived assets of our 15 ShopHouse restaurants.  Shophouse restaurants in 2016.

Income Tax Provision

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Year ended December 31,

 

% increase

 

% decrease

Year ended December 31,

 

Percentage Change

2017

 

2016

 

2015

 

2017 over 2016

 

2016 over 2015

2018

 

2017

 

2016

 

2018/2017

 

2017/2016

(dollars in millions)

 

 

 

 

(dollars in millions)

 

 

 

 

Provision for income taxes

$

99.5 

 

$

15.8 

 

$

294.3 

 

529.6% 

 

(94.6%)

$

91.9 

 

$

99.5 

 

$

15.8 

 

(7.6%)

 

529.6% 

Effective tax rate

 

36.1% 

 

40.8% 

 

38.2% 

 

 

 

 

 

34.2% 

 

36.1% 

 

40.8% 

 

 

 

 

The 2018 annual effective tax rate was lower than the 2017 rate primarily due to the favorable impacts of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act that was enacted in December 2017 and federal tax credits offset by unfavorable tax impacts of expirations and cancellations of various equity awards. 

35


Table of Contents

The 2017 annual effective tax rate was lower than the 2016 rate due to the enactment of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, resulting in our recording a benefit for the remeasurement of our deferred tax liability, as well as from a lower state tax rate. The decrease in our effective tax rate was partially offset by federal credits on overall higher pre-tax operating income.

The 2016 effective tax rate was higher than 2015 due to a higher state tax rate, not qualifying for the federal research and development tax credit in 2016 whereas we did qualify for the credit in 2015, and other federal credits on overall lower pre-tax operating income.

Quarterly Financial Data/Seasonality

The following table presents data from the consolidated statement of income for each of the eight quarters in the period ended December 31, 2017.2018. The operating results for any quarter are not necessarily indicative of the results for any subsequent quarter.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2017 Quarters Ended

 

2018 Quarters Ended

 

    March 31    

 

    June 30    

 

September 30

 

December 31

 

    March 31    

 

    June 30    

 

September 30

 

December 31

Revenue

 

$

1,068.8 

 

$

1,169.4 

 

$

1,128.1 

 

$

1,110.1 

 

$

1,148.4 

 

$

1,266.5 

 

$

1,225.0 

 

$

1,225.1 

Operating income

 

$

73.2 

 

$

106.7 

 

$

30.9 

 

$

60.0 

 

$

92.8 

 

$

68.0 

 

$

58.0 

 

$

39.6 

Net income

 

$

46.1 

 

$

66.7 

 

$

19.6 

 

$

43.8 

 

$

59.4 

 

$

46.9 

 

$

38.2 

 

$

32.0 

Number of restaurants opened in the quarter, net of relocations/closures

 

 

41 

 

48 

 

35 

 

34 

 

 

33 

 

 

26 

 

 

(4)

 

28 

Comparable restaurant sales increase

 

 

17.8% 

 

8.1% 

 

1.0% 

 

0.9% 

 

 

2.2% 

 

 

3.3% 

 

4.4% 

 

 

6.1% 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2016 Quarters Ended

 

2017 Quarters Ended

 

    March 31    

 

    June 30    

 

September 30

 

December 31

 

    March 31    

 

    June 30    

 

September 30

 

December 31

Revenue

 

$

834.5 

 

$

998.4 

 

$

1,037.0 

 

$

1,034.6 

 

$

1,068.8 

 

$

1,169.4 

 

$

1,128.1 

 

$

1,110.1 

Operating income (loss)

 

$

(46.6)

 

$

40.9 

 

$

9.7 

 

$

30.6 

Net income (loss)

 

$

(26.4)

 

$

25.6 

 

$

7.8 

 

$

16.0 

Operating income

 

$

73.2 

 

$

106.7 

 

$

30.9 

 

$

60.0 

Net income

 

$

46.1 

 

$

66.7 

 

$

19.6 

 

$

43.8 

Number of restaurants opened in the quarter, net of relocations/closures

 

 

56 

 

58 

 

54 

 

72 

 

 

41 

 

 

48 

 

 

35 

 

 

34 

Comparable restaurant sales increase (decrease)

 

 

(29.7%)

 

(23.6%)

 

(21.9%)

 

(4.8%)

Comparable restaurant sales increase

 

 

17.8% 

 

 

8.1% 

 

1.0% 

 

 

0.9% 

35




Table of Contents

Seasonal factors cause our profitability to fluctuate from quarter to quarter. Historically our average daily restaurant sales are lower, and net income has generally been lower, in the first and fourth quarters due in part to the holiday season and because fewer people eat out during periods of inclement weather (the winter months) than during periods of mild or warm weather (the spring, summer and fall months). Other factors also have a seasonal effect on our results. For example, restaurants located near colleges and universities generally do more business during the academic year. Seasonal factors, however, might be moderated or outweighed by other factors that may influence our quarterly results, such as unexpected publicity impacting our business in a positive or negative way, as well as fluctuations in food or packaging costs or the timing of menu price increases.increases or promotional activities and other marketing initiatives. The number of trading days in a quarter can also affect our results, although on an overall annual basis, changes in trading days do not have a significant impact.

Our quarterly results are also affected by other factors such as the number of new restaurants opened in a quarter, the amount and timing of non-cashnon-cash stock-based compensation expense, and anticipated and unanticipated events. New restaurants typically have lower margins following opening as a result of the expenses associated with opening new restaurants and their operating inefficiencies in the months immediately following opening. Accordingly, results for a particular quarter are not necessarily indicative of results to be expected for any other quarter or for any year.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Our primaryCash flows generated from operating activities are our principal source of liquidity, and capital requirements are forwhich we use to finance new restaurant construction, initiatives to improve the guest experience in our restaurants, working capital, and general corporate needs. As of December 31, 2017,2018, we had a cash and cash equivalent and short-term investment balance of $509.0$676.8 million that we expect to utilize, along with cash flow from operations, to provide capital to support the growth of our business, to invest in, maintain and refurbish our existing restaurants, to repurchase additional shares of our common stock subject to market conditions, and for general corporate purposes. As of December 31, 2017,2018, there was $118.3$57.6 million remaining available under previously-announced stock repurchase authorizations previously approved by our Board of Directors. We announced $100 million in additional repurchase authorizations in February 2019. Under the remaining repurchase authorizations, shares may be purchased from time to time in open market transactions, subject to market conditions. We believe that cash from operations, together with our cash and investment balances, will be enough to meet ongoing capital expenditures, working capital requirements and other cash needs for the foreseeable future.

We haven’thave not required significant working capital because customers generally pay using cash or credit and debit cards and because our operations do not require significant receivables, nor do they require significant inventories due, in part, to our use of various fresh ingredients. In addition, we generally have the right to pay for the purchase of food, beverage and supplies some time after the receipt of those items, generally within ten days, thereby reducing the need for incremental working capital to support our growth.

36


Table of Contents

Our total capital expenditures for 20172018 were $216.8$287.4 million. In 2017,2018, we spent on average about $835,000$0.9 million in development and construction costs per new restaurant, or about $735,000$0.8 million net of landlord reimbursements of $100,000.$0.1 million. In 2018,2019, we expect to incur about $300 million in total capital expenditures.  We expect the majority of our capital expenditures to consist of investments in existing restaurants, including remodeling and similar improvements, and upgrading our second make lines and other restaurant equipment. We also expect about $120$130 million in capital expenditures related to our construction of new restaurants, before any reductions for landlord reimbursements. For new restaurants to be opened in 2018,2019, we anticipate average development costs will increase due to strategic initiatives planned in most of our new restaurants such as the addition of thea pickup lane and an upgraded second make line. Finally, we expect a portion of our capital expenditures for the year to be incurred for additional corporate initiatives.   

Contractual Obligations

Our contractual obligations as of December 31, 20172018 were as follows:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Payments Due by Fiscal Year

 

Payments Due by Fiscal Year

 

Total

 

2018

 

2019-2020

 

2021-2022

 

Thereafter

 

Total

 

2019

 

2020-2021

 

2022-2023

 

Thereafter

 

(in thousands)

 

(in thousands)

Operating leases(1)

 

$

3,906,253 

 

$

281,461 

 

$

569,198 

 

$

558,431 

 

$

2,497,163 

 

$

3,950,378 

 

$

294,191 

 

$

591,520 

 

$

586,270 

 

$

2,478,397 

Purchase obligations(2)

 

$

929,242 

 

$

409,568 

 

$

323,906 

 

$

177,408 

 

$

18,360 

 

$

884,490 

 

$

584,941 

 

$

198,337 

 

$

101,212 

 

$

 -

Deemed landlord financing(1)

 

$

3,472 

 

$

423 

 

$

855 

 

$

908 

 

$

1,286 

 

$

3,049 

 

$

423 

 

$

889 

 

$

906 

 

$

831 

Total

 

$

4,838,967 

 

$

691,452 

 

$

893,959 

 

$

736,747 

 

$

2,516,809 

 

$

4,837,917 

 

$

879,555 

 

$

790,746 

 

$

688,388 

 

$

2,479,228 



(1)

See Note 8.11. “Leases” of our consolidated financial statements included in Item 8. “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.”

(2)

Purchase obligations include agreements to purchase goods or services that are enforceable and legally binding on us and that specify all significant terms. We have excluded agreements that are cancelable without penalty. The majority of our purchase

36


Table of Contents

obligations relate to amounts owed for chicken, produce, and other ingredients and supplies, construction contractor agreements, orders submitted for equipment for restaurants under construction and planned remodels, and marketing initiatives and corporate sponsorships.



The above table does not include income tax liabilities for uncertain tax positions for which we are not able to make a reasonably reliable estimate of the amount and period of related future payments. Additionally, we have excluded our estimated loss contingencies, including the accrued liability related to the data security incident described elsewhere, due to uncertainty regarding the timing and amount of payment. See Note 10.13. “Commitments and Contingencies” of our consolidated financial statements included in Item 8. “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.”

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

As of December 31, 20172018 and 2016,2017, we had no off-balance sheet arrangements or obligations.

Inflation

The primary areas of our operations affected by inflation are food, labor, healthcare costs, fuel, utility costs, and materials used in the construction of our restaurants. Although a significant majority of our crew members make more than the federal and applicable state and local minimum wage, increases in the applicable federal or state minimum wage may have an impact on our labor costs by causing wage inflation above the minimum wage level. Additionally, many of our leases require us to pay property taxes, maintenance, and utilities, all of which are generally subject to inflationary increases. In the past we have largely been able to offset inflationary increases with menu price increases. There have been, and there may be in the future, delays in implementing such menu price increases. If we do raise menu prices in the future, general competitive pressures or negative consumer responses may limit our ability to completely recover cost increases attributable to inflation.

Critical Accounting Estimates

We describe our significant accounting policies in Note 1. “Description of Business and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies” of our consolidated financial statements included in Item 8. “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.” Critical accounting estimates are those that we believe are both significant and that require us to make difficult, subjective or complex judgments, often because we need to estimate the effect of inherently uncertain matters. We base our estimates and judgments on historical experiences and various other factors that we believe to be appropriate under the circumstances. Actual results may differ from these estimates, and we might obtain different estimates if we used different assumptions or factors. We believe that of our critical accounting estimates, the following involve a higher degree of judgement and subjectivity.

37


Table of Contents

Leases

We lease nearly all of our restaurant locations. Our leases typically contain escalating rentals over the lease term as well as optional renewal periods. We have estimated that our lease term, including reasonably assured renewal periods, is the lesser of the lease term or 20 years.  We account for our leases by recognizing rent expense on a straight-line basis over the reasonably assured lease term. In addition, tenant incentives used to fund leasehold improvements are recognized when earned and recorded in deferred rent and amortized as reductions of rent expense over the reasonably assured lease term. The majority of our leasehold improvements are also depreciated over the reasonably assured lease term.  If the estimate of our reasonably assured lease term was changed, our depreciation and rent expense could differ materially.

We record a liability for lease termination costs consisting of the net present value of remaining lease obligations, net of estimated sublease rentals that could be reasonably obtained, at the date we cease using a property, and measure fair value using Level 3 inputs (unobservable inputs) based on a discounted cash flow method. Any subsequent adjustments to that liability as a result of lease termination or changes in estimates of sublease income are recorded in the period incurred. If the estimate of sublease income was changed, our lease termination expenses could differ materially.

Impairment of Long-Lived Assets

Long-lived assets are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. For the purpose of reviewing restaurant assets to be held and used for potential impairment, assets are grouped together at the market level, or in the case of a potential relocation or closure, at the restaurant level. We manage our restaurants as a group with significant common costs and promotional activities; as such, an individual restaurant’s cash flows are not generally independent of the cash flows of others in a market.

The fair value measurement for asset impairment is based on Level 3 inputs. We first compare the carrying value of the asset to the asset’s estimated future undiscounted cash flows. If the estimated undiscounted future cash flows are less than the carrying value of the asset, we determine if we have an impairment loss by comparing the carrying value of the asset to the asset's estimated fair value. The estimated fair value of the asset is generally determined using a discounted cash flow projection model. In certain cases, management uses other market information, when available, to estimate the fair value of an asset. The impairment charges represent the excess of each asset’s carrying amount over its estimated fair value. We make significant judgments to estimate future undiscounted cash flows and asset fair values. Estimates of future cash flows are highly subjective judgments based on internal projections and knowledge of our operations, historical performance, and trends in sales and restaurant operating costs, and can be significantly impacted by changes in our business or economic conditions. The determination of asset fair value is also subject to significant judgment and utilizes valuation techniques including discounting estimated future cash flows and market-based analyses to determine resale value. If our estimates or underlying assumptions, including discount rate, change in the future, our operating results may be materially impacted.

Stock-based Compensation

We recognize compensation expense for equity awards over the vesting period based on the award’s fair value. We use the Black-Scholes valuation model to determine the fair value of our stock-only stock appreciation rights, or SOSARs, and we use the Monte Carlo simulation model to determine the fair value of stock awards that contain market conditions. Both of these models require assumptions to be made regarding our stock price volatility, the expected life of the award and expected dividend rates. The volatility assumption was based on our historical data and implied volatility, and the expected life assumptions were based on our historical data. Similarly, the compensation expense of performance share awards, and SOSARs with performance-based vesting conditions, is based in part on the estimated probability of our achieving levels of performance associated with particular levels of payout for performance shares and with vesting for performance SOSARs. We determine the probability of achievement of future levels of performance by comparing the relevant performance level with our internal estimates of future performance. Those estimates are based on a number of assumptions, and different assumptions may have resulted in different conclusions regarding the probability of our achieving future levels of performance relevant to the payout levels for the awards. Had we arrived at different assumptions of stock price volatility or expected lives of our SOSARs, or different assumptions regarding the probability of our achieving future levels of performance with respect to performance share awards and performance SOSARs, our stock-based compensation expense and results of operations could have been different.  Certain awards that contain service, performance and market conditions have vesting criteria based on Chipotle’s relative performance versus a restaurant industry peer group in annual average revenue growth,

37


Table of Contents

net income growth, and total shareholder return. Our estimates of Chipotle’s future performance and the future performance of the restaurant industry peer group are assumptions that involve a high degree of subjectivity. If we had arrived at different assumptions for revenue growth or net income for Chipotle or the peer group, our stock-based compensation expense and results of operations could have been different.  

38


Table of Contents

Insurance Liability

We are self-insured for a significant portion of our risks and associated liabilities with respect to workers’ compensation, general liability, employee health, property and auto damage, butdamage. Predetermined loss limits have been arranged with third party insurance coveragecompanies to limit exposure to these claims. We record a liability that represents our estimated cost of claims incurred and unpaid as of the balance sheet date. Our estimated liability is not discounted and is based on a number of assumptions and factors, including historical trends, actuarial assumptions and economic conditions, and is closely monitored and adjusted when warranted by changing circumstances. Our history of claims experience is relatively short and our significant growth during most of our operating history could affect the accuracy of estimates based on historical experience. If a greater amount of claims occurs compared to what we have estimated, or if medical costs increase beyond what we expected, our accrued liabilities might not be sufficient and we may be required to record additional expense. Actual claims experience could also be more favorable than estimated, which would result in expense reductions. Unanticipated changes may produce materially different amounts of expense than that reported under these programs. The total estimated insurance liabilities as of December 31, 2017 were $52.0 million.

Reserves/Contingencies for Litigation and Other Matters

We are involved in various claims and legal actions that arise in the ordinary course of business. These actions are subject to many uncertainties,We record an accrual for legal contingencies when we determine that it is probable that we have incurred a liability and we cannot predict the outcomes with any degree of certainty. Consequently, we were unable tocan reasonably estimate the ultimate aggregate amount of monetary liability or financial impact with respect to these matters as of December 31, 2017. the loss.  Although we have recorded liabilities related to a number of legal actions, our estimates used to determine the amount of these liabilities may not be accurate, and there are other legal actions for which we have not recorded a liability.  As a result, in the event legal actions for which we have not accrued a liability or for which our accrued liabilities are not accurate are resolved, such resolution may affect our operating results and cash flows. 

Income Taxes

Our provision for income taxes requires the use of estimates in determining the timing and amounts of deductible and taxable items including impacts on effective tax rates, deferred tax items and valuation allowances based on our management’s interpretation and application of complex tax laws and accounting guidance. We establish reserves for uncertain tax positions for material, known tax exposures relating to deductions, transactions and other matters involving some uncertainty as to the measurement and recognition of the item. While we believe that our reserves are adequate, issues raised by a tax authority may be finally resolved at an amount different than the related reserve and could materially increase or decrease our income tax provision in the current and/or future periods.

38

39


 

Table of Contents

 

ITEM 7A.QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURE ABOUT MARKET RISK

Commodity Price Risks

We are exposed to commodity price risks. Many of the ingredients we use to prepare our food, as well as our packaging materials and utilities to run our restaurants, are ingredients or commodities that are affected by the price of other commodities, exchange rates, foreign demand, weather, seasonality, production, availability and other factors outside our control. We work closely with our suppliers and use a mix of forward pricing protocols under which we agree with our supplier on fixed prices for deliveries at some time in the future, fixed pricing protocols under which we agree on a fixed price with our supplier for the duration of that protocol, formula pricing protocols under which the prices we pay are based on a specified formula related to the prices of the goods, such as spot prices, and range forward protocols under which we agree on a price range for the duration of that protocol. However, a majority of the dollar value of our purchases is effectively at spot prices. Generally, our pricing protocols with suppliers can remain in effect for periods ranging from one to 2436 months, depending on the outlook for prices of the particular ingredient. In several cases, we have minimum purchase obligations. We’ve tried to increase, where practical, the number of suppliers for our ingredients, which we believe can help mitigate pricing volatility, and we follow industry news, trade issues, exchange rates, foreign demand, weather, crises and other world events that may affect our ingredient prices. Increases in ingredient prices could adversely affect our results if we choose for competitive or other reasons not to increase menu prices at the same rate at which ingredient costs increase, or if menu price increases result in customer resistance.

Changing Interest Rates

We are also exposed to interest rate risk through fluctuations of interest rates on our investments. Changes in interest rates affect the interest income we earn, and therefore impact our cash flows and results of operations. As of December 31, 2017,2018, we had $362.1$650.7 million in investments and interest-bearing cash accounts, including insurance-related restricted trust accounts classified in other assets, restricted cash, and $129.3 $35.3 million in accounts with an earnings credit we classify as interest and other income, which combined earned a weighted average interest rate of 0.97%2.2%.

Foreign Currency Exchange Risk

A portion of our operations consist of activities outside of the U.S. and we have currency risk on the transactions in other currencies and translation adjustments resulting from the conversion of our international financial results into the U.S. dollar. However, a substantial majority of our operations and investment activities are transacted in the U.S., and therefore our foreign currency risk is not material at this date.

 

39

40


 

Table of Contents

 

ITEM 8.  FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA

INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 



 



 



Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

4042 

Consolidated Balance Sheet as of December 31, 20172018 and 20162017

4243 

Consolidated Statement of Income and Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Income for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 2016 and 20152016 

4344 

Consolidated Statement of Shareholders’ Equity for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 2016 and 20152016

4445 

Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 2016 and 20152016

4546 

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

4647 



40

41


 

Table of Contents

 

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

To the Shareholders and Board of Directors of Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc.

Opinion on the Financial Statements

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheetsheets of Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc. (the Company), as of December 31, 20172018 and 2016,2017, and the related consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income, shareholders’ equity and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2017,2018, and the related notes (collectively referred to as the “financial“consolidated financial statements”). In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of the Company at December 31, 2018 and 2017, and 2016, and the consolidated results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2017,2018, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.

We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United Stated)States) (PCAOB), the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2017,2018, based on criteria established in Internal Control-IntegratedControl Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (2013 framework) and our report dated February 8, 20187, 2019 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.

Basis for Opinion

These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

/s/ Ernst & Young LLP

We have served as the Company’s auditor since 1997.

Denver, ColoradoIrvine, California

February 8, 20187, 2019



 

41

42


 

Table of Contents

 

CHIPOTLE MEXICAN GRILL, INC.

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET

(in thousands, except per share data)



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

December 31,

December 31,

2017

 

2016

2018

 

2017

 

 

 

 

 

 

Assets

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Current assets:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash and cash equivalents

$

184,569 

 

$

87,880 

$

249,953 

 

$

184,569 

Accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $0 and $259 as of December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively

 

40,453 

 

40,451 

Accounts receivable

 

62,312 

 

40,453 

Inventory

 

19,860 

 

15,019 

 

21,555 

 

19,860 

Prepaid expenses and other current assets

 

50,918 

 

44,080 

 

54,129 

 

50,918 

Income tax receivable

 

9,353 

 

5,108 

 

 -

 

9,353 

Investments

 

324,382 

 

 

329,836 

 

426,845 

 

 

324,382 

Total current assets

 

629,535 

 

 

522,374 

 

814,794 

 

 

629,535 

Leasehold improvements, property and equipment, net

 

1,338,366 

 

1,303,558 

 

1,379,254 

 

1,338,366 

Long term investments

 

 -

 

125,055 

Restricted cash

 

30,199 

 

29,601 

Other assets

 

55,852 

 

53,177 

 

19,332 

 

26,251 

Goodwill

 

21,939 

 

 

21,939 

 

21,939 

 

 

21,939 

Total assets

$

2,045,692 

 

$

2,026,103 

$

2,265,518 

 

$

2,045,692 

Liabilities and shareholders' equity

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Current liabilities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Accounts payable

$

82,028 

 

$

78,363 

$

113,071 

 

$

82,028 

Accrued payroll and benefits

 

82,541 

 

76,301 

 

113,467 

 

82,541 

Accrued liabilities

 

159,324 

 

127,129 

 

147,849 

 

95,679 

Unearned revenue

 

70,474 

 

63,645 

Income tax payable

 

5,129 

 

 

 -

Total current liabilities

 

323,893 

 

 

281,793 

 

449,990 

 

 

323,893 

Commitments and contingencies (Note 13)

 

 

 

 

Deferred rent

 

316,498 

 

288,927 

 

330,985 

 

316,498 

Deferred income tax liability

 

814 

 

18,944 

 

11,566 

 

814 

Other liabilities

 

40,042 

 

 

33,946 

 

31,638 

 

 

40,042 

Total liabilities

 

681,247 

 

 

623,610 

 

824,179 

 

 

681,247 

Shareholders' equity:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Preferred stock, $0.01 par value, 600,000 shares authorized, no shares issued as of December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively

 

 -

 

 -

Common stock $0.01 par value, 230,000 shares authorized, and 35,852 and 35,833 shares issued as of December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively

 

359 

 

358 

Preferred stock, $0.01 par value, 600,000 shares authorized, no shares issued as of December 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively

 

 -

 

 -

Common stock, $0.01 par value, 230,000 shares authorized, 35,973 and 35,852 shares issued as of December 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively

 

360 

 

359 

Additional paid-in capital

 

1,305,090 

 

1,238,875 

 

1,374,154 

 

1,305,090 

Treasury stock, at cost, 7,826 and 7,019 common shares at December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively

 

(2,334,409)

 

(2,049,389)

Treasury stock, at cost, 8,276 and 7,826 common shares at December 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively

 

(2,500,556)

 

(2,334,409)

Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)

 

(3,659)

 

(8,162)

 

(6,236)

 

(3,659)

Retained earnings

 

2,397,064 

 

 

2,220,811 

 

2,573,617 

 

 

2,397,064 

Total shareholders' equity

 

1,364,445 

 

 

1,402,493 

 

1,441,339 

 

 

1,364,445 

Total liabilities and shareholders' equity

$

2,045,692 

 

$

2,026,103 

$

2,265,518 

 

$

2,045,692 



Seeaccompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

 

42

43


 

Table of Contents

 

CHIPOTLE MEXICAN GRILL, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF INCOME

(in thousands, except per share data)















 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Year ended December 31,

Year ended December 31,

2017

 

2016

 

2015

2018

 

2017

 

2016

Revenue

$

4,476,412 

 

$

3,904,384 

 

$

4,501,223 

$

4,864,985 

 

$

4,476,412 

 

$

3,904,384 

Restaurant operating costs (exclusive of depreciation and amortization shown separately below):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Food, beverage and packaging

 

1,535,428 

 

1,365,580 

 

1,503,835 

 

1,600,760 

 

1,535,428 

 

1,365,580 

Labor

 

1,205,992 

 

1,105,001 

 

1,045,726 

 

1,326,079 

 

1,205,992 

 

1,105,001 

Occupancy

 

327,132 

 

293,636 

 

262,412 

 

347,123 

 

327,132 

 

293,636 

Other operating costs

 

651,644 

 

641,953 

 

514,963 

 

680,031 

 

651,644 

 

641,953 

General and administrative expenses

 

296,388 

 

276,240 

 

250,214 

 

375,460 

 

296,388 

 

276,240 

Depreciation and amortization

 

163,348 

 

146,368 

 

130,368 

 

201,979 

 

163,348 

 

146,368 

Pre-opening costs

 

12,341 

 

17,162 

 

16,922 

 

8,546 

 

12,341 

 

17,162 

Loss on disposal and impairment of assets

 

13,345 

 

 

23,877 

 

 

13,194 

Impairment, closure costs, and asset disposals

 

66,639 

 

 

13,345 

 

 

23,877 

Total operating expenses

 

4,205,618 

 

 

3,869,817 

 

 

3,737,634 

 

4,606,617 

 

 

4,205,618 

 

 

3,869,817 

Income from operations

 

270,794 

 

 

34,567 

 

 

763,589 

 

258,368 

 

 

270,794 

 

 

34,567 

Interest and other income, net

 

4,949 

 

 

4,172 

 

 

6,278 

 

10,068 

 

 

4,949 

 

 

4,172 

Income before income taxes

 

275,743 

 

 

38,739 

 

 

769,867 

 

268,436 

 

 

275,743 

 

 

38,739 

Provision for income taxes

 

(99,490)

 

 

(15,801)

 

 

(294,265)

 

(91,883)

 

 

(99,490)

 

 

(15,801)

Net income

$

176,253 

 

$

22,938 

 

$

475,602 

$

176,553 

 

$

176,253 

 

$

22,938 

Earnings per share:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Basic

$

6.19 

 

$

0.78 

 

$

15.30 

$

6.35 

 

$

6.19 

 

$

0.78 

Diluted

$

6.17 

 

$

0.77 

 

$

15.10 

$

6.31 

 

$

6.17 

 

$

0.77 

Weighted average common shares outstanding:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Weighted-average common shares outstanding:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Basic

 

28,491 

 

 

29,265 

 

 

31,092 

 

27,823 

 

 

28,491 

 

 

29,265 

Diluted

 

28,561 

 

 

29,770 

 

 

31,494 

 

27,962 

 

 

28,561 

 

 

29,770 







CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME

(in thousands)





 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Year ended December 31,

Year ended December 31,

2017

 

2016

 

2015

2018

 

2017

 

2016

Net income

$

176,253 

 

$

22,938 

 

$

475,602 

$

176,553 

 

$

176,253 

 

$

22,938 

Other comprehensive income (loss), net of income taxes:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Foreign currency translation adjustments

 

4,689 

 

(1,291)

 

(6,322)

 

(2,736)

 

4,689 

 

(1,291)

Unrealized gain (loss) on available-for-sale securities

 

(274)

 

2,251 

 

(2,468)

 

291 

 

(274)

 

2,251 

Tax benefit (expense)

 

88 

 

 

(849)

 

 

946 

 

(132)

 

 

88 

 

 

(849)

Other comprehensive income (loss), net of income taxes

 

4,503 

 

 

111 

 

 

(7,844)

 

(2,577)

 

 

4,503 

 

 

111 

Comprehensive income

$

180,756 

 

$

23,049 

 

$

467,758 

$

173,976 

 

$

180,756 

 

$

23,049 



Seeaccompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.



43

44


 

Table of Contents

 

CHIPOTLE MEXICAN GRILL, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY

(in thousands)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Common Stock

 

 

 

Treasury Stock

 

 

 

Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)

 

 

 

Common Stock

 

 

 

Treasury Stock

 

 

 

Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)

 

 

 

Shares

 

Amount

 

Additional
Paid-In
Capital

 

Shares

 

Amount

 

Retained
Earnings

 

Available-for-Sale Securities

 

 

Foreign Currency Translation

 

Total

Shares

 

Amount

 

Additional
Paid-In
Capital

 

Shares

 

Amount

 

Retained
Earnings

 

Available-for-Sale Securities

 

 

Foreign Currency Translation

 

Total

Balance, December 31, 2014

35,394 

 

$

354 

 

$

1,038,932 

 

4,367 

 

$

(748,759)

 

$

1,722,271 

 

$

 -

 

$

(429)

 

$

2,012,369 

Stock-based compensation

 

 

 

 

 

 

59,465 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

59,465 

Stock plan transactions and other

396 

 

 

 

 

(211)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(207)

Excess tax benefit on stock-based compensation

 

 

 

 

 

 

74,442 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

74,442 

Acquisition of treasury stock

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

839 

 

 

(485,853)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(485,853)

Net income

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

475,602 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

475,602 

Other comprehensive income (loss), net of income tax

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(1,522)

 

 

(6,322)

 

 

(7,844)

Balance, December 31, 2015

35,790 

 

$

358 

 

$

1,172,628 

 

5,206 

 

$

(1,234,612)

 

$

2,197,873 

 

$

(1,522)

 

$

(6,751)

 

$

2,127,974 35,790 

 

$

358 

 

$

1,172,628 

 

5,206 

 

$

(1,234,612)

 

$

2,197,873 

 

$

(1,522)

 

$

(6,751)

 

$

2,127,974 

Stock-based compensation

 

 

 

 

 

 

65,112 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

65,112 

 

 

 

 

65,112 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

65,112 

Stock plan transactions and other

43 

 

 

 -

 

 

(185)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(185)43 

 

 -

 

(185)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(185)

Excess tax benefit on stock-based compensation

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,320 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,320 

 

 

 

 

1,320 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,320 

Acquisition of treasury stock

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,813 

 

 

(814,777)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(814,777)

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,813 

 

(814,777)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(814,777)

Net income

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

22,938 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

22,938 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

22,938 

 

 

 

 

 

22,938 

Other comprehensive income (loss), net of income tax

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,402 

 

 

(1,291)

 

 

111 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,402 

 

 

(1,291)

 

 

111 

Balance, December 31, 2016

35,833 

 

$

358 

 

$

1,238,875 

 

7,019 

 

$

(2,049,389)

 

$

2,220,811 

 

$

(120)

 

$

(8,042)

 

$

1,402,493 35,833 

 

$

358 

 

$

1,238,875 

 

7,019 

 

$

(2,049,389)

 

$

2,220,811 

 

$

(120)

 

$

(8,042)

 

$

1,402,493 

Stock-based compensation

 

 

 

 

 

 

66,396 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

66,396 

 

 

 

 

66,396 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

66,396 

Stock plan transactions and other

19 

 

 

 

 

(181)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(180)19 

 

 

(181)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(180)

Acquisition of treasury stock

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

807 

 

 

(285,020)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(285,020)

 

 

 

 

 

 

807 

 

(285,020)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(285,020)

Net income

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

176,253 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

176,253 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

176,253 

 

 

 

 

 

176,253 

Other comprehensive income (loss), net of income tax

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(186)

 

 

4,689 

 

 

4,503 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(186)

 

 

4,689 

 

 

4,503 

Balance, December 31, 2017

35,852 

 

$

359 

 

$

1,305,090 

 

7,826 

 

$

(2,334,409)

 

$

2,397,064 

 

$

(306)

 

$

(3,353)

 

$

1,364,445 35,852 

 

$

359 

 

$

1,305,090 

 

7,826 

 

$

(2,334,409)

 

$

2,397,064 

 

$

(306)

 

$

(3,353)

 

$

1,364,445 

Stock-based compensation

 

 

 

 

 

 

69,947 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

69,947 

Stock plan transactions and other

121 

 

 

(883)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(882)

Acquisition of treasury stock

 

 

 

 

 

 

450 

 

(166,147)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(166,147)

Net income

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

176,553 

 

 

 

 

 

176,553 

Other comprehensive income (loss), net of income tax

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

159 

 

 

(2,736)

 

 

(2,577)

Balance, December 31, 2018

35,973 

 

$

360 

 

$

1,374,154 

 

8,276 

 

$

(2,500,556)

 

$

2,573,617 

 

$

(147)

 

$

(6,089)

 

$

1,441,339 



Seeaccompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

 

44

45


 

Table of Contents

 

CHIPOTLE MEXICAN GRILL, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS

(in thousands)

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Year ended December 31,

Year ended December 31,

2018

 

2017

 

2016

2017

 

2016

 

2015

 

 

 

(as adjusted)(1)

 

 

(as adjusted)(1)

Operating activities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net income

$

176,253 

 

$

22,938 

 

$

475,602 

$

176,553 

 

$

176,253 

 

$

22,938 

Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Depreciation and amortization

 

163,348 

 

146,368 

 

130,368 

 

201,979 

 

163,348 

 

146,368 

Deferred income tax (benefit) provision

 

(18,026)

 

(14,207)

 

 

11,666 

 

10,585 

 

(18,026)

 

(14,207)

Loss on disposal and impairment of assets

 

13,345 

 

23,877 

 

13,194 

Impairment, closure costs, and asset disposals

 

61,987 

 

13,345 

 

23,877 

Bad debt allowance

 

214 

 

(262)

 

(23)

 

125 

 

214 

 

(262)

Stock-based compensation expense

 

65,255 

 

64,166 

 

57,911 

 

69,164 

 

65,255 

 

64,166 

Excess tax benefit on stock-based compensation

 

 -

 

(1,320)

 

(74,442)

Other

 

(218)

 

(604)

 

 

582 

 

(2,918)

 

(218)

 

(1,924)

Changes in operating assets and liabilities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Accounts receivable

 

(140)

 

(1,923)

 

(3,504)

 

(8,298)

 

(140)

 

(1,923)

Inventory

 

(5,250)

 

(91)

 

262 

 

(1,722)

 

(5,250)

 

(91)

Prepaid expenses and other current assets

 

(6,710)

 

(4,259)

 

(5,259)

 

(3,811)

 

(6,710)

 

(4,259)

Other assets

 

(2,587)

 

(4,855)

 

(5,619)

 

(2,005)

 

(1,476)

 

1,063 

Accounts payable

 

10,908 

 

(6,734)

 

19,525 

 

32,080 

 

10,908 

 

(6,734)

Accrued payroll and benefits

 

29,568 

 

6,188 

 

11,416 

Accrued liabilities

 

38,574 

 

33,491 

 

(7,440)

 

14,831 

 

28,179 

 

13,692 

Unearned revenue

 

6,829 

 

4,207 

 

8,383 

Income tax payable/receivable

 

(4,173)

 

54,340 

 

32,756 

 

14,439 

 

(4,173)

 

54,340 

Deferred rent

 

29,996 

 

37,030 

 

32,911 

 

21,297 

 

29,996 

 

37,030 

Other long-term liabilities

 

6,316 

 

 

1,287 

 

 

4,826 

 

869 

 

 

6,316 

 

 

1,287 

Net cash provided by operating activities

 

467,105 

 

 

349,242 

 

 

683,316 

 

621,552 

 

 

468,216 

 

 

355,160 

Investing activities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Purchases of leasehold improvements, property and equipment

 

(216,777)

 

(258,842)

 

(257,418)

 

(287,390)

 

(216,777)

 

(258,842)

Purchases of investments

 

(199,801)

 

 

 -

 

(559,372)

 

(485,188)

 

(199,801)

 

 -

Maturities of investments

 

330,000 

 

45,000 

 

352,650 

 

385,000 

 

330,000 

 

45,000 

Proceeds from sale of investments

 

 -

 

 

540,648 

 

 

 -

 

 -

 

 

 -

 

 

540,648 

Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities

 

(86,578)

 

 

326,806 

 

 

(464,140)

 

(387,578)

 

 

(86,578)

 

 

326,806 

Financing activities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Acquisition of treasury stock

 

(285,920)

 

(837,655)

 

(460,675)

 

(160,937)

 

(285,218)

 

(836,760)

Excess tax benefit on stock-based compensation

 

 -

 

1,320 

 

74,442 

Tax withholding on share-based compensation awards

 

(5,411)

 

(702)

 

(895)

Stock plan transactions and other financing activities

 

26 

 

 

52 

 

 

(207)

 

(187)

 

 

26 

 

 

1,372 

Net cash used in financing activities

 

(285,894)

 

 

(836,283)

 

 

(386,440)

 

(166,535)

 

 

(285,894)

 

 

(836,283)

Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents

 

2,056 

 

 

110 

 

 

(4,196)

Net change in cash and cash equivalents

 

96,689 

 

 

(160,125)

 

(171,460)

Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year

 

87,880 

 

 

248,005 

 

 

419,465 

Cash and cash equivalents at end of year

$

184,569 

 

$

87,880 

 

$

248,005 

Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash

 

(1,457)

 

 

2,056 

 

 

110 

Net change in cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash

 

65,982 

 

97,800 

 

(154,207)

Cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash at beginning of period

 

214,170 

 

 

116,370 

 

 

270,577 

Cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash at end of period

$

280,152 

 

$

214,170 

 

$

116,370 

Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Income taxes paid

$

119,787 

 

$

23,862 

 

$

248,547 

$

67,053 

 

$

119,787 

 

$

23,862 

Increase (decrease) in purchases of leasehold improvements, property, and equipment accrued in accounts payable and accrued liabilities

$

(7,690)

 

$

(1,781)

 

$

(2,870)

$

(936)

 

$

(7,690)

 

$

(1,781)

Increase (decrease) in acquisition of treasury stock accrued in accrued liabilities

$

(900)

 

$

(22,778)

 

$

25,178 

$

200 

 

$

(900)

 

$

(22,778)

(1)

Balances were adjusted due to the adoption of Financial Accounting Standards Board Accounting Standards Update No. 2016-18, “Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230): Restricted Cash” as discussed in further detail in Note 1. “Description of Business and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies Recent Accounting Standards”



See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

 

45

46


 

Table of Contents

 

CHIPOTLE MEXICAN GRILL, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(dollar and share amounts in thousands, unless otherwise specified)

 

1. Description of Business and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

In this annual report on Form 10-K, Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc., a Delaware corporation, together with its subsidiaries, is collectively referred to as “Chipotle,” “we,” “us,” or “our.”

We develop and operate restaurants that serve a focusedrelevant menu of burritos, tacos, burrito bowls, tacos, and salads, made using fresh, high-quality ingredients. As of December 31, 2017,2018, we operated 2,3632,452 Chipotle restaurants throughout the United States as well as 37 international Chipotle restaurants and eighttwo non-Chipotle restaurants. We transitioned the management ofmanage our operations from 11 to nineand restaurants based on eight regions during 2017 and have aggregated our operations tothat aggregate into one reportable segment.

Principles of Consolidation and Basis of Presentation

Our consolidated financial statements include our accounts includingand our wholly and majority owned subsidiaries. Allsubsidiaries after elimination of all intercompany balancesaccounts and transactions have been eliminated.transactions.

Management Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities as of the date of the financial statements, andas well as the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates under different assumptions or conditions.

Revenue Recognition

We generally recognize revenue, net of discounts and incentives, when payment is tendered at the point of sale. We report revenue net of sales-related taxes collected from customers and remitted to governmental taxing authorities. We recognize a liability for offers of free food by estimating the cost to satisfy the offer based on company–specificcompany-specific historical redemption patterns for similar promotions. These costs are recognized in other operating costs inon the consolidated statementstatements of income and in accrued liabilities inon the consolidated balance sheet. sheets. 

Delivery

We reportoffer our customers delivery in certain geographic regions. Delivery services are fulfilled by third-party service providers. In some cases, we make delivery sales through Chipotle.com or the Chipotle App (“White Label Sales”). In other cases, we make delivery sales through a non-Chipotle owned channel, such as the delivery partner’s website or app (“Marketplace Sales”). With respect to White Label Sales, we control the delivery services and generally recognize revenue, netincluding delivery fees, when the delivery partner transfers food to the customer. For these sales, we receive payment directly from the customer at the time of sales-related taxes collected from customerssale. With respect to Marketplace Sales, we generally recognize revenue, excluding delivery fees, when control of the food is transferred to the delivery partner and remittedwe receive payment subsequent to governmental taxing authorities.the transfer of food. The payment terms with respect to Marketplace Sales are short-term in nature.

Gift Cards

We sell gift cards, which do not have an expiration datedates and we do not deduct non-usage fees from outstanding gift card balances. We recognize revenue from gift cards when: (i)when the gift card is redeemed by the customer; or (ii)customer. In addition, we also recognize revenue when we determine the likelihood of the gift card being redeemed by the customer is remote (gift card breakage) and there is not a legal obligation to remit the unredeemed gift cards to the relevant jurisdiction. The determination of the gift card breakage rate is based upon company-specific historical redemption patterns. We have determined that 4% of gift card sales will not be redeemed and will be retained. Gift card breakage is recognized in revenue as the gift cards are used on a pro rata basis.  During the quarter ended December 31, 2017, we revised thebasis over an eight-month period over which we recognize gift card breakage from six months to eight months frombeginning at the date of the gift card sale and is included in revenue on the consolidated statement of income. Breakage recognized during the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016We have determined that 4% of gift card sales will not be redeemed and 2015 was $3,590, $3,624 and $4,226, respectively.

During the year ended December 31, 2016, we offered a limited-time frequency program that awarded free food or merchandise to customers based on frequency of monthly visits. We deferred revenue reflecting the portion of original sales allocated to the rewards that were earnedwill be retained by program participants and not redeemedus. Gift card liability balances are typically highest at the end of each calendar year following increased gift card sales during the year,holiday season; accordingly, revenue recognized from gift card liability balances is highest in the first quarter of each calendar year.

Chipotle Rewards

Effective October 2018, we launched a loyalty program, Chipotle Rewards, in three test markets. Eligible customers who enroll in the program generally earn points for every dollar spent. After accumulating a certain number of points, the customer earns a reward that can be redeemed for a free entrée. We may also periodically offer promotions, which provide the customer with the

47


Table of Contents

opportunity to earn bonus points or free food. Earned rewards generally expire one to six months after they are issued, and recordedpoints generally expire if an account is inactive for a corresponding liability in accrued liabilities on our consolidated balance sheet.period of six months.

We defer revenue associated with the estimated selling price of points earned by program members as each point is earned. The portionestimated selling price of revenue allocated to the rewards waseach point earned is based on the estimated value of product for which the awardreward is expected to be redeemed, net of points we do not expect to be redeemed. Our estimate of points we expect to be redeemed is based on historical company specific data. We recognize loyalty revenue when a customer redeems an earned and takes into consideration company-specific historical redemption patterns for similar promotions.  Rewards expire according to the loyalty awards terms and conditions.reward. Deferred revenue related to the frequency program was $0 and $5,489 as of December 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively, and the entire amount that was deferred as of December 31, 2016 was recognized during 2017.associated with Chipotle Rewards is included in unearned revenue in our consolidated balance sheet.

Cash and Cash Equivalents

We consider all highly liquid investment instruments purchased with an initial maturity of three months or less to be cash equivalents. We maintain cash and cash equivalent balances with financial institutions that exceed federally-insured limits. limits with a number of financial institutions.

Restricted Cash

We have not experienced any losses relatedmaintain certain cash balances restricted as to these balances and believe the risk to be minimal.

withdrawal or use. 46Restricted cash assets are primarily insurance-related restricted trust assets.


Table of Contents

Accounts Receivable

Accounts receivable primarily consists of receivables from third party gift card distributors, tenant improvement receivables from landlords, vendor rebates, delivery receivables and interest receivable. The allowance for doubtful accounts is our best estimate of the amount of probable credit losses in our existing accounts receivable based on a specific review of account balances. Account balances are charged against the allowance after all means of collection have been exhausted and the potential for recoverability is considered remote. The allowance for doubtful accounts is zero for December 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively.

Inventory

Inventory, consisting principally of food, beverages, and supplies, is valued at the lower of first-in, first-out cost or net realizable value. Certain key ingredients (beef, pork, chicken, beans, rice, sour cream, cheese, and tortillas) are purchased from a small number of suppliers.

Investments

Investments classified as trading securities are carried at fair value with any unrealized gain or loss being recorded in the consolidated statement of income. Investments classified as available-for-sale are carried at fair value with unrealized gains and losses, net of tax, included as a component of other comprehensive income (loss) on the statement of comprehensive income. Held-to-maturity securities are carried at amortized cost. Impairment charges on investments are recognized in interest and other income, net on the consolidated statement of income when management believes the decline in the fair value of the investment is other-than-temporary.

Leasehold Improvements, Property and Equipment

Leasehold improvements, property and equipment are recorded at cost. Internal costs directly associated with the acquisition, development and construction of a restaurant are capitalized and were $6,285 and $7,507 $8,076 and $9,554 for the years endedas of December 31, 2017, 20162018 and 2015,2017, respectively. Expenditures for major renewals and improvements are capitalized while expenditures for minor replacements, maintenance and repairs are expensed as incurred. Depreciation is calculated using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets. Leasehold improvements are amortized over the shorter of the lease term, which generally includesinclude option periods that are reasonably assured, option periods, or the estimated useful lives of the assets. Upon retirement or disposal of assets, the accounts are relieved of cost and accumulated depreciation and any related gain or loss is reflected in loss on disposal and impairment of assets in the consolidated statement of income.

At least annually, we evaluate, and adjust when necessary, the estimated useful lives of leasehold improvements, property and equipment. The changes in estimated useful lives did not have a material impact on depreciation in any period. The estimated useful lives are:



 

Leasehold improvements and buildings

3-20 years

Furniture and fixtures

4-7 years

Equipment

3-10 years

48


Table of Contents

Goodwill

Goodwill represents the excess of cost over fair value of net assets of the business acquired. Goodwill is not subject to amortization, but instead is tested for impairment at least annually, and we are required to record any necessary impairment adjustments. Impairment is measured as the excess of the carrying value over the fair value of the goodwill. Based on our analysis, noNo impairment charges were recognized on goodwill for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 2016 and 2015.2016.

Other Assets

Other assets consist primarily of restricted cash assets of $29,601 and $28,490 as of December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively, a rabbi trust as described further in Note 7.10. “Employee Benefit Plans,” transferable liquor licenses which are carried at the lower of fair value or cost, fixed asset deposits, and rental deposits related to leased properties. Restricted cash assets are primarily insurance-related restricted trust assets.

47


Table of Contents

Impairment of Long-Lived Assets

Long-lived assets are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. For the purpose of reviewing restaurant assets to be held and used for potential impairment, assets are grouped together at the market level, or in the case of a potential relocation or closure, at the restaurant level. We manage our restaurants as a group with significant common costs and promotional activities; as such, an individual restaurant’s cash flows are not generally independent of the cash flows of others in a market. Recoverability of assets to be held and used is measured by a comparison of the carrying amount of an asset to the estimated undiscounted future cash flows expected to be generated by the asset. If the carrying amount of an asset exceeds its estimated future cash flows, an impairment charge is recognized as the amount by which the carrying amount of the asset exceeds the fair value of the asset.

During the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, an aggregate impairment charge of $3,291, $17,394 and $6,675, respectively, was recognized in loss on disposal and impairment of assets in the consolidated statement of income. During the year ended December 31, 2017, the impairment charges resulted primarily from the closure of a small number of underperforming Chipotle restaurants. Impairment charges recognized during the year ended December 31, 2016 resulted primarily from the impairment of ShopHouse Southeast Asian Kitchen restaurants which were closed during 2017. During the year ended December 31, 2015, the impairment charges resulted from an internally developed software program we chose not to implement and the related hardware, the discontinued use of certain kitchen equipment from our restaurants, as well as restaurant relocations. The fair value of restaurants was determined usingmeasurement for asset impairment is based on Level 3 inputs (unobservable inputs) based on a discounted cash flows method.inputs. See “Fair Value Measurements” below for a description of level inputs. We first compare the carrying value of the asset to the asset’s estimated future undiscounted cash flows. If the estimated undiscounted future cash flows are less than the carrying value of the asset, we determine if we have an impairment loss by comparing the carrying value of the asset to the asset's estimated fair value. The estimated fair value of the asset is generally determined using a discounted cash flow projection model. In certain cases, management uses other market information, when available, to estimate the fair value of an asset. The impairment charges represent the excess of each asset’s carrying amount over its estimated fair value.

Income Taxes

DeferredWe compute income taxes using the asset and liability method, under which deferred income tax assets and liabilities are recognized at enacted income tax rates forbased on the temporary differences between the financial reporting bases and the respective tax bases of our assets and liabilities. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using current enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which we expect the temporary differences to reverse. Any effects of changes in income tax rates or tax laws are included in the provision for income taxes in the period that includes the enactment date.

We routinely assess the realizability of enactment. Theour deferred income tax impactsassets by jurisdiction and may record a valuation allowance if, based on all available positive and negative evidence, we determine that some portion of investmentthe deferred tax credits are recognized asassets may not be realized prior to expiration.  If we determine that we may be able to realize our deferred tax assets in the future in excess of their net recorded amount, we would make an immediate adjustment to the deferred tax asset valuation allowance, which would reduce the provision for income taxes during the period in which the determination was made that the deferred tax expense. Whenasset can be realized.

We evaluate our tax exposures associated with our various tax filing positions and recognize a tax benefit from an uncertain tax position only if it is more likely than not that a portion or all of a deferredbased on its technical merits the tax asset will not be realized in the future, we provide a corresponding valuation allowance against the deferred tax asset, except for deferred tax assets related to stock awards when there is sufficient future taxable income to recover the deferred tax assets. When it is more likely than not that a position will be sustained upon examination by the relevant taxing authorities, including resolutions of any related appeals or litigation processes. The tax benefits recognized in the financial statements from such a tax authority that has full knowledge of all relevant information, we measure the amount of tax benefit from our position and recordare measured based on the largest amount of tax benefit that ishas a greater than 50% likelylikelihood of being realized afterupon settlement with a taxing authority. For uncertain tax authority. Our policypositions that do not meet this threshold, we record a related tax liability in the period in which it arises. We adjust our unrecognized tax benefit liability and income tax expense in the period in which the uncertain tax position is effectively settled, the statute of limitations expires for the relevant taxing authority to examine the tax position or when new information becomes available that requires a change in recognition and/or measurement of the liability.

We recognize interest to be paid on an underpayment of income taxes in interest expense and any related statutory penalties in the provision for income taxes in theour consolidated statement of income.  Accrued interest and penalties are included within the related tax liability on our consolidated balance sheet.

Restaurant Pre-Opening Costs

Pre-opening costs, including rent, wages, benefits and travel for training and opening teams, food and other restaurant operating costs, are expensed as incurred prior to a restaurant opening for business, and are included in operating expenses on the consolidated statement of income.    

49


Table of Contents

Insurance Liability

We are self-insured for a significant portion of our risks and associated liabilities with respect to workers’ compensation, general liability, employee health, general liability, automobile,property and propertyauto damage. PursuantPredetermined loss limits have been arranged with third party insurance companies to limit exposure to these policies, we are responsible for losses up to varying deductibles and are required to estimateclaims. We record a liability that represents the ultimate exposure for aggregate losses below those limits. This liability is based on our estimatesestimated cost of the ultimate costs to beclaims incurred to settle known claims and where applicable, claims not reportedunpaid as of the balance sheet date. TheOur estimated liability is not discounted and is based on a number of assumptions and factors, including historical trends, actuarial assumptions and economic conditions, and economic conditions. If actual trends differ fromis closely monitored and adjusted when warranted by changing circumstances.

Reserves/Contingencies for Litigation and Other Matters

We are involved in various claims and legal actions that arise in the estimates,ordinary course of business. We record an accrual for legal contingencies when we determine that it is probable that we have incurred a liability and we can reasonably estimate the financial results could be impacted. As of December 31, 2017 and 2016, $37,096 and $35,550, respectively,amount of the estimated liability was included in accrued payroll and benefits and $14,014 and $13,881, respectively, was included in accrued liabilities in the consolidated balance sheet.

48loss.


Table of Contents

Advertising and Marketing Costs

Advertising and marketing costs are expensed as incurred and totaled $111,695, $106,345 $102,969 and $69,257$102,969 for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 2016 and 2015,2016, respectively. Advertising and marketing costs are included in other operating costs inon the consolidated statement of income.income.  

Rent

Rent expense for our leases, which generally have escalating rentals over the term of the lease, is recorded on a straight-line basis over the lease term. The lease term is the lesser of 20 years inclusive of reasonably assured renewal periods, or the lease term. The lease term begins when we have the right to control the use of the property, which is typically before rent payments are due under the lease. The difference between the rent expense and rent paid is recorded as deferred rent inon the consolidated balance sheet. Pre-opening rent is included in pre-opening costs inon the consolidated statement of income. Tenant incentives used to fund leasehold improvements are recorded in deferred rent and amortized as reductions of rent expense over the term of the lease.

Additionally, certain operating leases contain clauses that provide additional contingent rent based on a percentage of sales greater than certain specified target amounts. Contingent rent expense is recognized provided the achievement of that target is considered probable.

We record a liability for lease termination costs at the date we cease using a property, consisting of the net present value of remaining lease obligations, net of estimated sublease rentals that could be reasonably obtained, and measure fair value using Level 3 inputs (unobservable inputs) based on a discounted cash flow method. Any subsequent adjustments to that liability as a result of lease termination or changes in estimates of sublease income are recorded in the period incurred.

Stock-Based Compensation

We issue shares as part of employee compensation pursuant to the Amended and Restated Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc. 2011 Stock Incentive Plan (the “2011 Incentive Plan”).  Stock onlyStock-only stock appreciation rights, (“SOSARs”)or SOSARs, and stock awards generally vest equally over two and three years and expire after seven years.  Stock-based compensation expense is generally recognized on a straight-line basis for each separate vesting portion. Compensation expense related to employees eligible to retire and retain full rights to the awards is recognized over six months which coincides with the notice period. We estimate forfeitures based on historical data when determining the amount of stock-based compensation costs to be recognized in each period. We have also granted SOSARs and stock awards with performance vesting conditions and/or market vesting conditions. Stock awards with performance or market vesting conditions generally vest based on our achievement versus stated targets or criteria over a three-year performance and service period.  Compensation expense on SOSARs subject to performance conditions is recognized over the longer of the estimated performance goal attainment period or time vesting period. Compensation expense on stock awards subject to performance conditions, which is based on the quantity of awards we have determined are probable of vesting, is recognized over the longer of the estimated performance goal attainment period or time vesting period. Compensation expense is recognized ratably for awards subject to market conditions regardless of whether the market condition is satisfied, provided that the requisite service has been provided. Some stock-based compensation awards are made to employees involved in our new restaurant development activities, and expense for these awards is recognized as capitalized development and included in leasehold improvements, property and equipment inon the consolidated balance sheet.

Fair Value

50


Table of Financial InstrumentsContents

The carrying value of cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable and accounts payable approximate fair value because of their short-term nature.

Fair Value Measurements

Fair value is the price we would receive to sell an asset or pay to transfer a liability (exit price) in an orderly transaction between market participants. For assets and liabilities recorded or disclosed at fair value on a recurring basis, we determine fair value based on the following:

Level 1: Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that the entity has the ability to access.

Level 2: Observable inputs other than prices included in Level 1, such as quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets; quoted prices for identical or similar assets and liabilities in markets that are not active; or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated with observable market data.

Level 3: Unobservable inputs that are supported by littlefor the asset or no market activity and that are significant to the fair value of the assets and liabilities.liability. This includes certain pricing models, discounted cash flow methodologies and similar techniques that use significant unobservable inputs.

49


Table of Contents

Foreign Currency Translation

Our international operations use the local currency as the functional currency. Assets and liabilities are translated at exchange rates in effect as of the balance sheet date. Income and expense accounts are translated at the average monthly exchange rates during the year. Resulting translation adjustments are recorded as a separate component of other comprehensive income (loss) inon the consolidated statement of comprehensive income.

Earnings per Share

Basic earnings per share is calculated by dividing income available to common shareholders by the weighted-average number of shares of common stock outstanding during each period. Diluted earnings per share (“diluted EPS”) is calculated using income available to common shareholders divided by diluted weighted-average shares of common stock outstanding during each period. Potentially dilutive securities include shares of common stock underlying SOSARs and non-vested stock awards (collectively “stock awards”). Diluted EPS considers the impact of potentially dilutive securities except in periods in which there is a loss because the inclusion of the potential common shares would have an anti-dilutive effect. Stock awards are excluded from the calculation of diluted EPS in the event they are subject to performance conditions or are antidilutive.

Recently Issued Accounting Standards

In November 2016,August 2018, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2016-18, “Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230)No. 2018-15, “Intangibles—Goodwill and Other—Internal-Use Software (Subtopic 350-40),: Customer’s Accounting for Implementation Costs Incurred in a Cloud Computing Arrangement That Is a Service Contract, which provides guidance onclarifies the classification of restricted cash to be included with cash and cash equivalents when reconciling the beginning of period and end of period total amounts on the statement of cash flows. We will be adopting this pronouncement on January 1, 2018, using a retrospective adoption method. For the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, $29,601,  $28,490 and $22,572, respectively, of restricted cash would have been includedaccounting for implementation costs in cash and cash equivalents and changescloud computing arrangements. ASU 2018-15 is effective for us in the balance excluded from net cash provided by operating activities in thefirst quarter of fiscal 2020, and early adoption is permitted. The adoption of ASU 2018-15 is still being evaluated on our consolidated statement of cash flows if this new guidance had been adopted as of the respective dates.financial statements.

In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-02, “Leases (Topic 842)., and issued additional clarifications and improvements throughout 2018. The pronouncement requires lessees to recognize a liability for lease obligations, which representrepresents the discounted obligation to make future minimum lease payments, and a corresponding right-of-use asset on the balance sheet. The guidance requires disclosure of key information about leasing arrangements which arethat is intended to give financial statement users the ability to assess the amount, timing, and potential uncertainty of cash flows related to leases. We expect to adopthave adopted the requirements of the new lease standard effective January 1, 2019. We have elected the optional transition method to apply the standard as of the effective date and therefore, we will not apply the standard to the comparative periods presented in our financial statements. At the beginning of the period of adoption, we will recognize a cumulative-effect adjustment in retained earnings due to impairment of certain right-of-use assets at the effective date. We will elect the transition package of three practical expedients permitted within the standard, which eliminates the requirements to reassess prior conclusions about lease identification, lease classification, and initial direct costs. We will not elect the hindsight practical expedient, which permits the use of hindsight when determining lease term and impairment of right-of-use assets. Further, we will elect a short-term lease exception policy, permitting us to not apply the recognition requirements of this standard to short-term leases (i.e. leases with terms of 12 months or less) and an accounting policy to account for lease and non-lease components as a single component for certain classes of assets. We are currently evaluatingfinalizing the provisionsimpact of the new lease standard including optional practical expedients, and assessing our existing lease portfolio in order to determine the impact to our accounting systems,policies, processes, disclosures, and internal control over financial reporting. reporting and have implemented necessary upgrades to our existing lease system.

The adoption of ASU 2016-02 will have a significant impact on our consolidated balance sheet becauseas we will record material assets and obligations for currentprimarily related to approximately 2,500 restaurant operating leases and corporate office leases. We are still assessingexpect to record operating lease liabilities of approximately $2.7 billion based on the expectedpresent value of the remaining minimum rental payments using discount rates as of the effective date. We expect to record corresponding right-of-use assets of approximately $2.4 billion, based upon the operating lease liabilities adjusted for prepaid and deferred rent, unamortized initial direct costs, liabilities associated with lease

51


Table of Contents

termination costs and impairment of right-of-use assets recognized in retained earnings as of January 1, 2019. We do not expect a material impact on our consolidated statementsstatement of income andor our consolidated statement of cash flows. 

In May 2014,Furthermore, we have evaluated our existing sales and leaseback transactions, which do not qualify for sale leaseback accounting under ASC 840, and determined that these transactions do not qualify for sale leaseback accounting under ASC 842 due to fixed price renewal options prohibiting sale accounting. These transactions will continue to be accounted for under the FASBfinancing method upon transition to ASC 842.

We reviewed all other recently issued accounting pronouncements and concluded that they were either not applicable or not expected to have a significant impact to the consolidated financial statements.

Recently Adopted Accounting Standard

During the first quarter of 2018, we adopted ASU No. 2014-09 “Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606),” as amended by multiple standards updates. This guidancewhich requires an entity to recognize revenue when it transfers promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. Additionally, this guidance will require us to enhance our disclosures, including disclosing performance obligations to customers arising from gift cards and certain promotional activity. The pronouncement is effective for reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017. The adoption isdid not expected to have an impact on our consolidated financial position or results of operations. 

We reviewed all other recently issued accounting pronouncements and concluded that they were either not applicable or not expected to have a significant impact to the consolidated financial statements.

Recently Adopted Accounting Standard

In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-09, “Compensation-Stock Compensation (Topic 718).” The pronouncement was issued to simplify several aspectsbalance sheet, statements of the accounting for share-based payment transactions, including the income, tax consequences, classification of awards as either equity or liabilities and classification on the consolidated statement of cash flows.

We adopted ASU 2016-09 on January 1, 2017, prospectively (prior periods have not been restated). The primary impact of adoption was the recognition forenhancement of our disclosures related to gift cards and certain promotional activity included in Note 1. “Description of Business and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies” and Note 3. “Revenue Recognition.”

During the year endedfirst quarter of 2018, we retrospectively adopted ASU 2016-18, “Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230): Restricted Cash,” which requires restricted cash to be classified with cash and cash equivalents when reconciling the beginning of period and end of period total amounts on the statement of cash flows. Accordingly, we reclassified $29,601 and $28,490 of restricted cash into cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash asof December 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, for a total balance of an excess tax benefit of $448,$214,170 and $116,370, which reduces our provision for income taxesresulted in a $1,111 and the classification of these excess tax benefits$5,918 increase in net cash provided by operating activities in the consolidated statement of cash flows instead of financing activities.

The presentation requirements for the twelve months ended December 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively. Restricted cash flowsassets are primarily insurance related to employee taxes paid for withheld shares had no impact to any of the periods presented in the consolidated statement of cash flows, since such cash flows have historically been presented in financing activities. We also elected to continue estimating forfeitures when determining the amount of stock-based compensation costs to be recognized in each period. No other provisions of ASU 2016-09 had a material impact on our financial statements or disclosures.restricted trust assets.

 

2. Supplemental Financial Information

Leasehold improvements, property and equipment were as follows:



 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 



December 31,



2018

 

2017

Land

$

12,943 

 

$

12,943 

Leasehold improvements and buildings

 

1,689,873 

 

 

1,635,422 

Furniture and fixtures

 

173,252 

 

 

166,915 

Equipment

 

543,869 

 

 

460,138 

Construction in Progress

 

42,824 

 

 

41,872 

Leasehold improvements, property and equipment

 

2,462,761 

 

 

2,317,290 

Accumulated depreciation

 

(1,083,507)

 

 

(978,924)

Leasehold improvements, property and equipment, net

$

1,379,254 

 

$

1,338,366 

Accrued payroll and benefits were as follows:



 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 



December 31,



2018

 

2017

Workers' compensation liability

$

30,878 

 

$

34,631 

Accrued payroll

 

35,622 

 

 

19,666 

Other accrued payroll and benefits

 

46,967 

 

 

28,244 

Accrued payroll and benefits

$

113,467 

 

$

82,541 

50

52


 

Table of Contents

 



 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 



December 31,



2017

 

2016

Land

$

12,943 

 

$

12,943 

Leasehold improvements and buildings

 

1,677,294 

 

 

1,572,606 

Furniture and fixtures

 

166,915 

 

 

157,541 

Equipment

 

460,138 

 

 

405,937 

Leasehold improvements, property and equipment

 

2,317,290 

 

 

2,149,027 

Accumulated depreciation

 

(978,924)

 

 

(845,469)

Leasehold improvements, property and equipment, net

$

1,338,366 

 

$

1,303,558 

Accrued payroll and benefits were as follows:



 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 



December 31,



2017

 

2016

Workers' compensation liability

$

34,631 

 

$

33,038 

Accrued payroll

 

19,666 

 

 

22,338 

Other accrued payroll and benefits

 

28,244 

 

 

20,925 

Accrued payroll and benefits

$

82,541 

 

$

76,301 

Accrued liabilities were as follows:



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

December 31,

December 31,

2017

 

2016

2018

 

2017

Gift card liability

$

63,645 

 

$

59,438 

Transaction tax payable

 

18,920 

 

20,435 

 

21,762 

 

 

18,920 

Data security incident liability

 

30,000 

 

 -

 

29,289 

 

30,000 

Other accrued liabilities

 

46,759 

 

 

47,256 

 

96,798 

 

 

46,759 

Accrued liabilities

$

159,324 

 

$

127,129 

$

147,849 

 

$

95,679 

 

3. InvestmentsRevenue Recognition

AsThe gift card liability included in unearned revenue on the consolidated balance sheets is as follows:



 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 



 



December 31,



2018

 

2017

Gift card liability

$

70,474 

 

$

63,645 

Revenue recognized on the consolidated statements of income for the redemption of gift cards that were included in accrued liabilities at the beginning of the year is as follows:



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 



Year ended December 31,



2018

 

2017

 

2016

Revenue recognized from gift card liability balance at the beginning of the year

$

36,094 

 

$

37,109 

 

$

32,744 

We offered a limited-time frequency program called Chiptopia Summer Rewards during the third quarter of 2016, which allowed customers to redeem certain rewards earned through the first quarter of 2017. We deferred revenue reflecting the portion of the original rewards that were earned by program participants and not redeemed, and we recorded a corresponding liability on the consolidated balance sheet. The portion of revenue allocated to the rewards was based on the estimated standalone selling price of the award earned and took into consideration company-specific historical redemption patterns for similar promotions. Revenue was recognized as an award was redeemed, or upon expiration. During the twelve months ended December 31, 2017, and 2016, our investments consisted of U.S. treasury notes with maturities upwe recognized $5,489 in revenue from the deferred liability for the loyalty rewards balance. No other material amounts related to approximately one year and were classified as available-for-sale.  Fair value of U.S. treasury notes is measured on a recurring basis based on Level 1 inputs (quoted pricesloyalty rewards have been recognized in revenue for identical assets in active markets).any periods presented.

The following is a summary of available-for-sale securities:



 

 

 

 

 



 

 



December 31,

 

December 31,



2017

 

2016

Amortized cost

$

324,875 

 

$

455,109 

Unrealized gains (losses)

 

(493)

 

 

(218)

Fair value

$

324,382 

 

$

454,891 



51

53


 

Table of Contents

 

4. Fair Value of Financial Instruments

The followingcarryingvalue of our cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable and accounts payable approximate fair value because of their short-term nature.

Our investments consist of U.S. treasury notes with maturities of up to one year. Fair value of investments is a summarymeasured using Level 1 inputs. We designate the appropriate classification of our investments at the time of purchase based upon the intended holding period.

As of September 30, 2018, we transferred the classification of our investments from available-for-sale (“AFS”) to held-to-maturity (“HTM”) due to our ability and intent to hold these securities to maturity.  The transfer from AFS to HTM was recorded at the fair value of the AFS securities at the time of transfer. The unrealized gains (losses) on available-for-sale securities recordedholding loss of $303, net of tax, at the date of transfer was retained in other comprehensive income (loss) inon the consolidated statement of comprehensive income:income. Such amounts will be amortized to interest and other income on the consolidated statement of income over the remaining life of the securities. The amortization of this unrealized holding loss will be offset by the discount created as a result of this reclassification, which will also be amortized over the remaining life of the securities to interest and other income on the consolidated statement of income.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



Year ended December 31,



2017

 

2016

 

2015

Unrealized gains (losses) on available-for-sale securities

$

(274)

 

$

2,251 

 

$

(2,468)

Unrealized gains (losses) on available-for-sale securities, net of tax

$

(186)

 

$

1,402 

 

$

(1,522)

HTM securities are carried at amortized cost, which approximated fair value as of December 31, 2018. We recognize impairment charges when management believes the decline in the fair value of the investment is other-than-temporary. No impairment charges were recognized on our investments for the twelve months ended December 31, 2018. The fair value of our investments as of December 31, 2017, which were then classified as AFS, was $324,382, which included an unrealized loss of $493.  

Realized gains and losses on available-for-saleAFS securities are recorded in interest and other income on the consolidated statement of income. We had no realized gains or losses for the years ended December 31, 20172018 and 2015,2017, and $547 of realized gains on available-for-saleAFS securities for the year ended December 31, 2016. During the year ended December 31, 2015, we recorded an other-than-temporary impairment charge of $244 in interest and other income in the consolidated statement of income in connection with a decline in the fair market value of certain available-for-sale securities.

We have elected to fund certain deferred compensation obligations through a rabbi trust, the assets of which are designated as trading securities, as described further in Note 7.10. “Employee Benefit Plans.”

4.

Assets and Liabilities Measured at Fair Value on a Nonrecurring Basis

Assets recognized or disclosed at fair value on the consolidated financial statements on a nonrecurring basis include items such as leasehold improvements, property and equipment, goodwill, and other intangible assets. These assets are measured at fair value if determined to be impaired.

Other than as disclosed in Note 5. “Corporate Restructuring Costs” and Note 6. “Restaurant Closure Costs and Impairment of Long-Lived Assets” as of December 31, 2018 and 2017, we had no non-financial assets or liabilities that were measured using Level 3 inputs.

5. Corporate Restructuring Costs

In May 2018, we announced that we would open a headquarters office in Newport Beach, California, consolidate certain corporate administrative functions into our existing office in Columbus, Ohio, and close our existing headquarters offices in Denver, Colorado, as well as additional corporate offices in New York, New York. All affected employees were either offered an opportunity to continue in the new organization or were offered a severance package. We record severance as a one-time termination benefit and recognize the expense ratably over the employees’ required future service period. We record a liability for lease termination costs at the date we cease using property, consisting of the net present value of remaining lease obligations, net of estimated sublease rentals that could be reasonably obtained, and measure fair value using Level 3 inputs. Any subsequent adjustments to that liability as a result of lease termination or changes in estimates of sublease income are recorded in the period incurred.All other costs, including other employee transition costs, recruitment and relocation costs, other office closure costs, and third-party costs, are recognized in the period incurred.

54


Table of Contents

Corporate restructuring costs consist of the following:

Year ended December 31,

2018

Employee severance and other employee transition costs(1)

$

6,919 

Recruitment and relocation costs(1)

9,952 

Lease termination and other office closure costs(2)

15,571 

Third-party and other costs(1)

8,836 

Stock-based compensation(1)

1,345 

Total restructuring costs

$

42,623 

__________________

(1)

Recorded in general and administrative expenses on the consolidated statement of income.

(2)

Recorded in impairment, closure costs, and asset disposals on the consolidated statement of income.

Changes in our restructuring liability which are included in accrued liabilities on the consolidated balance sheet were as follows:



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



Balance December 31, 2017

 

Charges

 

Payments

 

Balance December 31, 2018

Employee severance and other employee transition costs

$

 -

 

$

6,919 

 

$

(4,197)

 

$

2,722 

Recruitment and relocation costs

 

 -

 

 

9,952 

 

 

(9,728)

 

 

224 

Lease termination and other office closure costs

 

 -

 

 

15,571 

 

 

 -

 

 

15,571 

Third-party and other costs

 

 -

 

 

8,836 

 

 

(8,282)

 

 

554 

Total restructuring liability

$

 -

 

$

41,278 

 

$

(22,207)

 

$

19,071 

6. Restaurant Closure Costs and Impairment of Long-Lived Assets

During the year ended December 31, 2018, we closed or relocated a total of 48 underperforming Chipotle restaurants, five Pizzeria Locale restaurants, and one TastyMade restaurant. As a result, we incurred lease termination, asset impairment and other closure costs, which were recorded in impairment, closure costs, and asset disposals on the consolidated statement of income as follows:



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



Year ended December 31,



2018

 

2017

 

2016

Lease termination and other restaurant closure costs

$

40,522 

 

$

3,284 

 

$

17,394 

Changes in our lease termination costs liability which is included in accrued liabilities on the consolidated balance sheet were as follows:



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



Balance December 31, 2017

 

Charges

 

Payments

 

Balance December 31, 2018

Lease termination costs for closed restaurants

$

1,416 

 

$

13,843 

 

$

(4,519)

 

$

10,740 

In June 2018, we announced planned restaurant closures of approximately 55 to 65 restaurants beginning in the second quarter of 2018 and continuing over the next several quarters. As a part of this plan, and included in the total lease termination and other restaurant closure costs discussed above, we have closed or relocated 45 Chipotle restaurants and five Pizzeria Locale restaurants.

55


Table of Contents

7. Income Taxes

The components of the provision for income taxes are as follows:



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Year ended December 31,

Year ended December 31,

2017

 

2016

 

2015

2018

 

2017

 

2016

Current tax:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

U.S. Federal

$

98,208 

 

$

20,765 

 

$

244,470 

$

58,878 

 

$

98,208 

 

$

20,765 

U.S. State

 

18,639 

 

 

8,687 

 

 

37,957 

 

21,780 

 

 

18,639 

 

 

8,687 

Foreign

 

669 

 

 

556 

 

 

172 

 

637 

 

 

669 

 

 

556 

 

117,516 

 

 

30,008 

 

 

282,599 

 

81,295 

 

 

117,516 

 

 

30,008 

Deferred tax:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

U.S. Federal

 

(16,201)

 

 

(11,596)

 

 

11,000 

 

10,541 

 

 

(16,201)

 

 

(11,596)

U.S. State

 

(1,559)

 

 

(2,546)

 

 

699 

 

479 

 

 

(1,559)

 

 

(2,546)

Foreign

 

(496)

 

 

(2,470)

 

 

(2,288)

 

(2,261)

 

 

(496)

 

 

(2,470)

 

(18,256)

 

 

(16,612)

 

 

9,411 

 

8,759 

 

 

(18,256)

 

 

(16,612)

Valuation allowance

 

230 

 

 

2,405 

 

 

2,255 

 

1,829 

 

 

230 

 

 

2,405 

Provision for income taxes

$

99,490 

 

$

15,801 

 

$

294,265 

$

91,883 

 

$

99,490 

 

$

15,801 

On December 22, 2017, the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, (the “TCJA”) was enacted.  

The TCJA includes a number of changes to existing U.S. tax laws that impact the Company, most notably a reduction of the U.S. corporateeffective tax rate from 35% to 21%,  for tax years beginning after December 31, 2017.  We recorded a benefit of $6,047 ($0.21 per basic and diluted earnings per share) in deferred income tax expense for the remeasurement of our net deferred tax liability at the 21% tax rate.  The TCJA also provides for acceleration of depreciation for certain assets placed into service after September 27, 2017, as well as prospective changes beginning in 2018, including additional limitations on deductibility of executive compensation and employee meal benefits.

The $6,047 benefit represents what we believe is the impact of the TCJA.  As the benefit is based on currently available information and interpretations, which are continuing to evolve, the benefit should be considered provisional.  We will continue to analyze additional information and guidance related to the TCJA as supplemental legislation, regulatory guidance, or evolving technical interpretations become available.  The final impacts may differdiffers from the recorded amountsstatutory tax rates as of December 31, 2017, and we will continue to refine such amounts within the measurement period provided by Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 118.  We expect to complete our analysis no later than the fourth quarter of 2018.follows:

Actual taxes paid for 2016 and 2015 were less than the current tax expense due to the excess tax benefit on stock-based compensation of $1,320 and $74,442 during the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively.



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

Year ended December 31,



 

2018

 

2017

 

2016

Statutory U.S. federal income tax rate

 

21.0 

%

 

35.0 

%

 

35.0 

%

State income tax, net of related federal income tax benefit

 

6.6 

 

 

4.4 

 

 

13.3 

 

Federal credits

 

(2.1)

 

 

(1.5)

 

 

(10.1)

 

Executive compensation disallowed

 

1.4 

 

 

 -

 

 

 -

 

Meals and entertainment

 

0.1 

 

 

 -

 

 

 -

 

Enhanced deduction for food donation

 

(0.1)

 

 

(0.2)

 

 

(2.4)

 

Valuation allowance

 

0.7 

 

 

0.1 

 

 

6.0 

 

Other

 

3.5 

 

 

1.5 

 

 

6.2 

 

Effects of the TCJA

 

 -

 

 

(2.3)

 

 

 -

 

Return to provision and other discrete items

 

1.1 

 

 

(0.9)

 

 

(7.2)

 

Equity compensation related adjustments

 

2.0 

 

 

 -

 

 

 -

 

Effective income tax rate

 

34.2 

%

 

36.1 

%

 

40.8 

%

52

56


 

Table of Contents

 

The effective tax rate differs from the statutory tax rates as follows:



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

Year ended December 31,



 

2017

 

2016

 

2015

Statutory U.S. federal income tax rate

 

35.0 

%

 

35.0 

%

 

35.0 

%

State income tax, net of related federal income tax benefit

 

4.4 

 

 

13.3 

 

 

3.6 

 

Federal credits

 

(1.5)

 

 

(10.1)

 

 

(0.4)

 

Enhanced deduction for food donation

 

(0.2)

 

 

(2.4)

 

 

(0.2)

 

Valuation allowance

 

0.1 

 

 

6.0 

 

 

0.3 

 

Other

 

1.5 

 

 

6.2 

 

 

 -

 

Effects of the TCJA

 

(2.3)

 

 

 -

 

 

 -

 

Return to provision and other discrete items

 

(0.9)

 

 

(7.2)

 

 

(0.1)

 

Effective income tax rate

 

36.1 

%

 

40.8 

%

 

38.2 

%

The 20172018 annual effective tax rate was lower than the 20162017 rate primarily due to the enactmentfavorable impacts of the TCJA (as defined below) and a lower statefederal tax rate, partiallycredits offset by federal credits on overall higher pre-tax operating income. unfavorable tax impacts of expirations and cancellations of various equity awards.

The 2016 effective tax rate was higher than 2015 due to a higher state tax rate, not qualifying forcomponents of the federal research and development tax credit in 2016, and other federal credits on overall lower pre-tax operating income.

Deferred income tax liabilities are taxes we expect to pay in future periods. Similarly, deferred income tax assets are recorded for expected reductions in taxes payable in future periods. Deferred income taxes arise becauseand liabilities as of the differences in the book and tax bases of certain assets and liabilities.

Deferred income tax liabilities and assets consist of the following:



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

December 31,



 

 

 

2017

 

2016

Deferred income tax liability:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Leasehold improvements, property and equipment

 

 

 

$

140,908 

 

$

204,640 

Goodwill and other assets

 

 

 

 

1,339 

 

 

1,856 

Prepaid assets and other

 

 

 

 

5,191 

 

 

6,012 

Total deferred income tax liability

 

 

 

 

147,438 

 

 

212,508 

Deferred income tax asset:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Deferred rent

 

 

 

 

42,859 

 

 

63,159 

Gift card liability

 

 

 

 

4,580 

 

 

5,563 

Capitalized transaction costs

 

 

 

 

324 

 

 

500 

Stock-based compensation and other employee benefits

 

 

 

 

80,447 

 

 

101,628 

Foreign net operating loss carry-forwards

 

 

 

 

11,376 

 

 

9,580 

State credits

 

 

 

 

5,589 

 

 

4,595 

Allowances, reserves and other

 

 

 

 

13,719 

 

 

19,359 

Valuation allowance

 

 

 

 

(12,270)

 

 

(10,820)

Total deferred income tax asset

 

 

 

 

146,624 

 

 

193,564 

Net deferred income tax liability

 

 

 

$

814 

 

$

18,944 

The December 31, 2018 and 2017 deferred tax liability was measured using a 21% U.S. federal tax rate because of the enactment of TCJA, which reduced the rate from 35%.for continuing operations are as follows:



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

December 31,



 

 

 

2018

 

2017

Deferred income tax liability:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Leasehold improvements, property and equipment

 

 

 

$

144,113 

 

$

140,908 

Goodwill and other assets

 

 

 

 

1,438 

 

 

1,339 

Prepaid assets and other

 

 

 

 

4,154 

 

 

5,191 

Total deferred income tax liability

 

 

 

 

149,705 

 

 

147,438 

Deferred income tax asset:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Deferred rent

 

 

 

 

49,481 

 

 

42,859 

Gift card liability

 

 

 

 

5,752 

 

 

4,580 

Capitalized transaction costs

 

 

 

 

323 

 

 

324 

Stock-based compensation and other employee benefits

 

 

 

 

65,651 

 

 

80,447 

Foreign net operating loss carry-forwards

 

 

 

 

11,871 

 

 

11,376 

State credits

 

 

 

 

5,230 

 

 

5,589 

Allowances, reserves and other

 

 

 

 

13,355 

 

 

13,719 

Valuation allowance

 

 

 

 

(13,524)

 

 

(12,270)

Total deferred income tax asset

 

 

 

 

138,139 

 

 

146,624 

Net deferred income tax liability

 

 

 

$

11,566 

 

$

814 



As of December 31, 2017,2018, we have $8,468$1,530 of deferred tax assets related to outstanding non-vested stock awards that contain market conditions. If market conditions are not achieved, then we may not realize the benefit of these deferred tax assets, which would result in a higherincrease our effective tax raterates in future periods.

As of December 31, 2018 and 2017, the gross foreign net operating losses were $54,599 and $50,292 as of December 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively.

53As of December 31, 2018 and 2017, we had gross valuation allowances of approximately $63,509 and $54,675, respectively, against certain foreign deferred tax assets. The increase in the valuation allowance was primarily due to the recording of a valuation allowance on various foreign tax attributes.

Unrecognized Tax Benefits


TableA reconciliation of Contents

Thethe unrecognized tax benefits areis as follows:



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Year ended December 31,

2017

 

2016

 

2015

2018

 

2017

 

2016

Beginning of year

$

4,211 

 

$

3,776 

 

$

1,342 

$

8,937 

 

$

4,211 

 

$

3,776 

Increase resulting from prior year tax position

 

 -

 

 

 -

 

 

402 

Increase resulting from current year tax position

 

4,726 

 

 

435 

 

 

2,032 

 

751 

 

 

4,726 

 

 

435 

Lapsing of statutes of limitations

 

(328)

 

 

 -

 

 

 -

End of year

$

8,937 

 

$

4,211 

 

$

3,776 

$

9,360 

 

$

8,937 

 

$

4,211 



Interest expense related to uncertain tax positions is recognized in interest expense, and penalties related to uncertain tax positions are recognized in income tax expense. During the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017, 2016, and 2015,2016, we recognized $536,  $364, $430, and $0,$430, respectively, in interest expense related to uncertain tax positions. These balances are gross amounts before any tax benefits and are included in other liabilities in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets. We have $794accrued $1,329 and $430$794 for the payment of interest accrued at December 31, 2018 and 2017, and 2016, respectively. We are open to federal and state tax audits until the applicable statutes of limitations expire. Tax audits by their very nature are often complex and can require several years to complete.

We are no longer subject to U.S. federal tax examinations by tax authorities for tax years before 2014.2015. For the majority of states where we have a significant presence, we are no longer subject to tax examinations by tax authorities for tax years before 2014.2015. Currently, we expect expirations of statutes of limitations, excluding indemnified amounts, on reserves of approximately $767 within the next twelve months.

57


Table of Contents

It is reasonably possible the amount of the unrecognized benefit with respect to certain unrecognized positions could significantly increase or decrease within the next twelve months and would have an impact on net income.

Tax Cuts and Jobs Act

Effective for tax years beginning after December 31, 2017, the U.S. corporate income tax rate is 21% pursuant to the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (“TCJA”), that was signed into law December 2017.  As of December 31, 2017,2018, we hadhave completed our accounting for the tax effects of the TCJA and recorded cumulative grosstax adjustments of $6,446 in accordance with SAB 118 guidance.

In connection with the TCJA, a one-time transition tax is assessed on total post-1986 accumulated foreign net operating lossesearnings and profits that were previously deferred from U.S. income taxes, the amount of $50,292, whichthose earnings held in cash, and other specified assets and foreign tax pools. Based on our analysis of our total post-1986 accumulated foreign earnings and profits that were previously deferred from U.S. income taxes, the amount of those earnings held in cash, and other specified assets and foreign tax pools, we have no expiration date.determined a one-time transition tax of $0. 

 

5.8. Shareholders’ Equity

Through December 31, 2017,2018, we had announced authorizations by our Board of Directors of repurchases of shares of common stock, which in the aggregate, authorized expenditures of up to $2,400,000.$2.5 billion. On February 6, 2019, we announced that our Board of Directors authorized the repurchase of up to an additional $100,000 for repurchase of shares of common stock. Under the remaining repurchase authorizations, shares may be purchased from time to time in open market transactions, subject to market conditions.

The following table summarizes common stock repurchases under authorized programs:



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



Year ended December 31,



2017

 

2016

 

2015

Shares of common stock repurchased

 

805 

 

 

1,811 

 

 

839 

Total cost of common stock repurchased

$

284,318 

 

$

813,881 

 

$

485,841 



As of December 31, 2017, $118,2742018, $57,551 was available to be repurchased under the authorizedpreviously-announced repurchase programs. The sharesShares repurchased are being held in treasury stock until such time as they are reissued or retired at the discretion of the Board of Directors.

During 2018, 2017, 2016, and 2015,2016, shares of common stock were netted and surrendered as payment for minimum statutory tax withholding obligations in connection with the exercise and vesting of outstanding stock awards. We deem shares surrendered by the participants in accordance with the applicable award agreements and plan as repurchased, but do not deem such shares to be part of publicly announced share repurchase programs.

 

6.9. Stock-Based Compensation

Pursuant to the 2011 Incentive Plan, we grant stock options, SOSARs, restricted stock units (“RSUs”), or performance/market based restricted stock units (“PSUs”) to employees and non-employee directors. We issue shares in connection with stock-based compensation pursuantof common stock upon the exercise of SOSARs and the vesting of RSUs and PSUs.

Under the 2011 Incentive Plan, 6,830 shares of common stock have been authorized and reserved for issuance to the Amended and Restated Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc. 2011 Stock Incentive Plan.eligible participants, of which 2,626 shares were authorized for issuance but not issued or subject to outstanding awards at December 31, 2018. For purposes of countingcalculating the available shares remaining available under the 2011 Incentive Plan, each share issuable pursuant to outstanding full value awards, such as restricted stock unitsRSUs and performance shares,PSUs, counts as two shares, used, whereasand each share underlying a stock appreciation rightoption or stock option countsSOSAR count as one share used. Under the 2011 Incentive Plan, 5,560 shares of common stock have been authorized and reserved for issuance to eligible participants, of which 1,786 represent shares that were authorized for issuance but not issued or subject to outstanding awards at December 31, 2017.share. The 2011 Incentive Plan is administered by the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors, which has the authority to select the individuals to whom awards will be granted or to delegate its authority under the plan to make grants (subject to certain legal and regulatory restrictions), to determine the type of awards and when the awards are to be granted, the number of shares to be covered by each award, the vesting schedule and all other terms and conditions of the awards. The exercise price for stock awards granted under the 2011 Incentive Plan cannot be less than fair market value at the date of grant.

Stock-based compensation expense recognized in the consolidated financial statements was as follows:



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



Year ended December 31,



2018

 

2017

 

2016

Stock-based compensation expense

$

69,947 

 

$

66,396 

 

$

65,112 

Stock-based compensation expense, net of tax

$

51,544 

 

$

40,370 

 

$

35,974 

Stock-based compensation expense recognized as capitalized development

$

783 

 

$

1,141 

 

$

946 

Excess tax benefit (deficit) on stock-based compensation recognized in provision for income taxes

$

(6,162)

 

$

448 

 

$

 -

54

58


 

Table of Contents

 

SOSARs

The following table sets forth stock-based compensation expense, including SOSARs and stock awards:



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



Year ended December 31,



2017

 

2016

 

2015

Stock-based compensation expense

$

66,396 

 

$

65,112 

 

$

59,465 

Stock-based compensation expense, net of tax

$

40,370 

 

$

35,974 

 

$

36,666 

Stock-based compensation expense recognized as capitalized development

$

1,141 

 

$

946 

 

$

1,554 

Excess tax benefit on stock-based compensation recognized in provision for income taxes

$

448 

 

$

 -

 

$

 -

The tables below summarize the SOSAR activity under the stock incentive plans2011 Stock Incentive Plan (in thousands, except years and per share data): was as follows:  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2017

 

2016

 

2015

2018

 

2017

 

2016

Shares

 

Weighted-Average Exercise Price Per Share

 

Shares

 

Weighted-Average Exercise Price Per Share

 

Shares

 

Weighted-Average Exercise Price Per Share

Shares

 

Weighted-Average Exercise Price Per Share

 

Shares

 

Weighted-Average Exercise Price Per Share

 

Shares

 

Weighted-Average Exercise Price Per Share

Outstanding, beginning of year

1,917 

 

$

490.06 

 

1,694 

 

$

490.70 

 

2,087 

 

$

395.46 1,999 

 

$

480.09 

 

1,917 

 

$

490.06 

 

1,694 

 

$

490.70 

Granted

304 

 

$

426.70 

 

460 

 

$

457.77 

 

379 

 

$

659.12 741 

 

$

396.66 

 

304 

 

$

426.70 

 

460 

 

$

457.77 

Exercised

(35)

 

$

307.83 

 

(124)

 

$

315.87 

 

(716)

 

$

297.25 (408)

 

$

353.98 

 

(35)

 

$

307.83 

 

(124)

 

$

315.87 

Forfeited or cancelled

(187)

 

$

527.53 

 

(113)

 

$

559.25 

 

(56)

 

$

554.73 (180)

 

$

489.14 

 

(187)

 

$

527.53 

 

(113)

 

$

559.25 

Expired

(1)

 

$

437.62 

 

 -

 

$

 -

 

 -

 

$

 -

Outstanding, end of year

1,999 

 

$

480.09 

 

1,917 

 

$

490.06 

 

1,694 

 

$

490.70 2,151 

 

$

474.51 

 

1,999 

 

$

480.09 

 

1,917 

 

$

490.06 







 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



Shares

 

Weighted-Average Exercise Price Per Share

 

Weighted-Average Remaining Years of Contractual Life

 

Aggregate Intrinsic Value

Outstanding as of December 31, 2017

1,999 

 

$

480.09 

 

3.7 

 

$

209 

Vested and expected to vest as of December 31, 2017

1,957 

 

$

480.77 

 

3.7 

 

$

209 

Exercisable as of December 31, 2017

1,130 

 

$

474.20 

 

2.7 

 

$

209 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



Shares

 

Weighted-Average Exercise Price Per Share

 

Weighted-Average Remaining Years of Contractual Life

 

Aggregate Intrinsic Value

Outstanding as of December 31, 2018

2,151 

 

$

474.51 

 

3.8 

 

$

49,160 

Vested and expected to vest as of December 31, 2018

2,107 

 

$

476.09 

 

3.7 

 

$

47,427 

Exercisable as of December 31, 2018

1,047 

 

$

538.93 

 

2.3 

 

$

10,627 



In the past,No SOSARs that included performance conditions were granted during 2018, 2017, or 2016, but in previous years, we have granted SOSARs that included performancesuch conditions. As of December 31, 2017, 2782018, 253 SOSARs with performance conditions were outstanding, SOSARs that included performance conditionsand all were determined to have met the performance conditions. For the remaining 110 outstanding SOSARs that included performance conditions, the financial targets underlying the performance conditions had been satisfied as of December 31, 2017, and vesting of the awards was pending confirmation by the Compensation Committee that the performance conditions were met.

The total intrinsic value of options and SOSARs exercised during the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016 was $35,907, $4,296, and 2015 was $4,296, $15,946, and $260,466. Unearnedrespectively. Unrecognized stock-based compensation expense for SOSARs as of December 31, 20172018 was $21,998 for SOSAR awards,$34,826 and is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 1.41.7 years.

55


Table of Contents

The following table reflects the weighted average assumptions utilized in the Black-Scholes option-pricing model to estimate the fair value of SOSAR awards granted for each year:year were as follows:   



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2017

 

2016

 

2015

 

2018

 

2017

 

2016

Risk-free interest rate

 

 

1.6 

%

 

 

1.0 

%

 

 

1.1 

%

 

 

2.4 

%

 

 

1.6 

%

 

 

1.0 

%

Expected life (years)

 

3.7 

 

 

 

3.5 

 

 

3.4 

 

 

 

3.9 

 

 

 

3.7 

 

 

3.5 

 

Expected dividend yield

 

0.0 

%

 

 

0.0 

%

 

0.0 

%

 

 

0.0 

%

 

 

0.0 

%

 

0.0 

%

Volatility

 

29.9 

%

 

 

32.2 

%

 

30.8 

%

 

 

32.2 

%

 

 

29.9 

%

 

32.2 

%

Weighted-average Black-Scholes fair value per share at date of grant

 

$

105.97 

 

 

$

117.48 

 

 

$

156.32 

 

 

$

77.61 

 

 

$

105.97 

 

 

$

117.48 

 



The risk-free interest rate is based uponon U.S. Treasury rates for instruments with similar terms, and the expected life assumptions wereassumption is based on our historical data. We have not paid dividends to date and do not plan to pay dividends in the near future. The volatility assumption wasis based on our historical data and implied volatility.

59


Table of Contents

Non-Vested Stock Awards (RSUs)

A  summary of non-vested stock award activity under the 2011 Stock Incentive Plans and prior stock compensation planPlan is as follows (in thousands, except per share data):



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2017

 

2016

 

2015

2018

 

2017

 

2016

Shares

 

Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value
Per Share

 

Shares

 

Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value
Per Share

 

Shares

 

Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value
Per Share

Shares

 

Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value
Per Share

 

Shares

 

Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value
Per Share

 

Shares

 

Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value
Per Share

Outstanding, beginning of year

125 

 

$

606.24 

 

116 

 

$

511.88 

 

70 

 

$

525.60 213 

 

$

519.62 

 

125 

 

$

606.24 

 

116 

 

$

511.88 

Granted

127 

 

$

436.36 

 

90 

 

$

509.05 

 

47 

 

$

785.32 141 

 

$

305.00 

 

127 

 

$

436.36 

 

90 

 

$

509.05 

Vested

(8)

 

$

454.84 

 

(7)

 

$

605.83 

 

(1)

 

$

413.07 (39)

 

$

732.65 

 

(8)

 

$

454.84 

 

(7)

 

$

605.83 

Forfeited or cancelled

(31)

 

$

502.46 

 

(74)

 

$

529.54 

 

 -

 

$

534.55 (91)

 

$

473.64 

 

(31)

 

$

502.46 

 

(74)

 

$

529.54 

Expired

 -

 

$

 -

 

 -

 

$

 -

 

 -

 

$

 -

Outstanding, end of year

213 

 

$

519.62 

 

125 

 

$

606.24 

 

116 

 

$

511.88 224 

 

$

373.32 

 

213 

 

$

519.62 

 

125 

 

$

606.24 

There were 141 non-vested stock awards with a weighted average grant date fair value per share of $522.38$305 that were vested and expected to vest as of December 31, 2017. The aggregate intrinsic value of the shares was $32,829 and the weighted average remaining contractual life was 5.8 years. Unearned2018. Unrecognized stock-based compensation expense for non-vested stock awards we have determined are probable of vesting was $37,962$33,113 as of December 31, 2017,2018, and is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 1.6 years. The fair value of shares earned as of the vesting date during the yearyears ended December 31, 2018, 2017, and 2016 was $13,509,  $3,524, and 2015 was $3,524,  $2,787, and $634, respectively.

Non-Vested Performance Stock Awards (PSUs)

As of December 31, 2017,  1332018, 70 of the outstanding non-vested stock awards were subject to performance and/or market conditions, in addition to service vesting conditions. During the first quarteryear ended December 31, 2018, we awarded 29 performance shares that are subject to service and performance vesting conditions. The shares had a weighted-average grant date fair value was $328.74 per share and vest based on our growth in comparable restaurant sales and average restaurant margin over defined periods. The quantity of shares that will vest range from 0% to 300% of the targeted number of shares. If the defined minimum targets are not met, then no shares will vest.

During the year ended December 31, 2017, we awarded 36 performance shares that are subject to service, market and performance vesting conditions. Two-thirds of the shares had a grant date fair value of $485.53 per share and have vesting criteria based on the price of our common stock reaching certain targets for a consecutive number of days during the three-year period starting on the grant date, with the quantity of shares that vest ranging from 0% to 350% of the targeted number of shares. The remaining one-third of the shares had a grant date fair value of $427.61 and have vesting criteria based on reaching certain comparable restaurant sales increases during the three-year period starting on January 1, 2017, with the quantity of shares that vest ranging from 0% to 300% of the targeted number of shares.  If the defined minimum targets are not met, then no shares will vest.

During the year ended December 31, 2016, we awarded 73 performance shares, net of cancellations, that are subject to both service and market vesting conditions. The quantity of shares that vest will range from 0% to 400% of a targeted number of shares, and will be determined based on the price of our common stock reaching certain targets for a consecutive number of days during the three-year period starting on the grant date.  If the minimum defined stock price target is not met, then no shares will vest.

During the year ended December 31, 2015, we awarded 40 performance shares that were subject to service, performance, and market vesting conditions.  The quantity of shares that vest will be determined based on our relative performance versus a restaurant industry peer group in annual average revenue growth, net income growth, and total shareholder return. The quantity of shares that vest will range from 0% to 200% based on the level of achievement of the performance and market conditions. If minimum targets are not met, then no shares will vest. Each performance and market measure will be weighted equally, and performance is calculated over a three-year period beginning January 1, 2015 through December 31, 2017.

56


Table of Contents

During the year ended December 31, 2017, 202018, 62 stock awards that were subject to service and performance or market conditions were forfeited.forfeited.

60


Table of Contents

We adjusted our estimates of the non-vested stock awards expected to vest, which had the following reduction on our expense and earnings per share (dollars in thousands, except per share data) in each of the following years:



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Year ended December 31,

Year ended December 31,

2017

 

2016

 

2015

2018

 

2017

 

2016

Cumulative change in expense

$

(1,410)

 

$

(6,031)

 

$

(12,195)

$

(79)

 

$

(1,410)

 

$

(6,031)

Net of tax impact from cumulative change in expense

$

(857)

 

$

(3,332)

 

$

(7,520)

$

(58)

 

$

(857)

 

$

(3,332)

Impact on basic earnings per share

$

0.03 

 

$

0.11 

 

$

0.25 

$

 -

 

$

0.03 

 

$

0.11 

Impact on diluted earnings per share

$

0.03 

 

$

0.11 

 

$

0.24 

$

 -

 

$

0.03 

 

$

0.11 

No stock awards with market conditions were granted during the year ended December 31, 2018. Measurement of the grant date fair value of the stock awards with market conditions in prior years included a Monte Carlo simulation model, which incorporates into the fair value determination the possibility that the market condition may not be satisfied, using the following assumptions:



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2017

 

2016

 

2015

 

2018

 

2017

 

2016

Risk-free interest rate

 

 

1.5 

%

 

 

0.9 

%

 

 

1.0 

%

 

 

N/A

 

 

 

1.5 

%

 

 

0.9 

%

Expected life (years)

 

3.0 

 

 

 

3.0 

 

 

2.9 

 

 

 

N/A

 

 

 

3.0 

 

 

 

Expected dividend yield

 

0.0 

%

 

 

0.0 

%

 

0.0 

%

 

 

N/A

 

 

 

0.0 

%

 

0.0 

%

Volatility

 

29.9 

%

 

 

31.4 

%

 

33.7 

%

 

 

N/A

 

 

 

29.9 

%

 

31.4 

%



The assumptions are based on the same factors as those described for SOSARs, except that the expected life is based on the contractual performance period for the stock awards.



7.In May 2018, as a result of the transition of employees in connection with the corporate restructuring described in Note 5. “Corporate Restructuring Costs”, we reduced our estimate of the number of certain SOSAR and RSU awards that we expect to vest, resulting in a cumulative adjustment to reduce expense of $5,360. In July 2018, we modified service requirements for certain SOSAR and RSU awards for approximately 340 employees, resulting in additional expense of approximately $6,900, of which $6,705 has been recognized during the year ended December 31, 2018. We expect to incur additional expense of $200 in 2019.

10. Employee Benefit Plans

We maintain the Chipotle Mexican Grill 401(k) Plan (the “401(k) Plan”). We match 100% of the first 3% of pay contributed by each eligible employee and 50% on the next 2% of pay contributed. Employees become eligible to receive matching contributions after one year of service with the Company.Chipotle. For the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017, 2016, and 2015,2016, matching contributions totaled approximately $6,090, $6,072 $5,939 and $4,995,$5,939, respectively.

We also maintain the Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc. Supplemental Deferred Investment Plan (the “Deferred Plan”) which covers our eligible employees. The Deferred Plan is a non-qualified plan that allows participants to make tax-deferred contributions that cannot be made under the 401(k) Plan because of Internal Revenue Service limitations. Participants’ earnings on contributions made to the Deferred Plan fluctuate with the actual earnings and losses of a variety of available investment choices selected by the participant. Total liabilities under the Deferred Plan as of December 31, 2018 and 2017 were $10,872 and 2016 were $19,887, and $17,843, respectively, and are included in other liabilities inon the consolidated balance sheet. We match 100% of the first 3% of pay contributed by each eligible employee and 50% on the next 2% of pay contributed once the 401(k) contribution limits are reached. For the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017, 2016, and 2015,2016, we made deferred compensation matches of $152, $199, $225, and  $617,$225, respectively, to the Deferred Plan.

We have elected to fund our deferred compensation obligation through a rabbi trust. The rabbi trust is subject to creditor claims in the event of insolvency, but the assets held in the rabbi trust are not available for general corporate purposes. Amounts in the rabbi trust are invested in mutual funds, consistent with the investment choices selected by participants in their Deferred Plan accounts, which are designated as trading securities and carried at fair value, and are included in other assets inon the consolidated balance sheet. Fair value of mutual funds is measured using Level 1 inputs (quoted prices for identical assets in active markets), and the. The fair values of the investments in the rabbi trust were $19,887$10,872 and $17,843$19,887 as of December 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively. The realized and 2016, respectively. Tradingunrealized holding gains and losses related to these investments, as well as the offsetting deferred compensation expense, are recorded in general and administrative expenses inon the consolidated statement of income, along with the offsetting amount related to the increase or decrease in deferred compensation to reflect its exposure of the Deferred Plan liability.

57


Table of Contents

The following table sets forth unrealized gains (losses) on trading securities held in the rabbi trust:



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



Year ended December 31,



2017

 

2016

 

2015

Unrealized gains (losses) on trading securities held in rabbi trust

$

1,520 

 

$

586 

 

$

(571)

income.

We also offer an employee stock purchase plan (“ESPP”). Employees become eligible to participate after one year of service with Chipotle and may contribute up to 15% of their base earnings, subject to an annual maximum dollar amount, toward the monthly purchase of our common stock. The purchase price is 95% of the fair market value of the stock on the last trading date of the monthly exercise period. Under the ESPP, 250 shares of common stock have been authorized and reserved for issuances to eligible employees,

61


Table of Contents

of which 246 represent shares that were authorized for issuance but not issued at December 31, 2017.2018.  For each of the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017, 2016, and 2015,2016, the number of shares issued each year under the ESPP werewas less than 1.

8.

11. Leases

Our restaurants are generallyprimarily operated in leased premises. Lease terms for traditional shopping center or building leases generally include combined initial and option terms of 20-25 years. Ground leases generally include combined initial and option terms of 30-40 years. The option terms in each of these leases are typically in five-year increments. Typically, the lease includesour leases include rent escalation terms every five years including fixed rent escalations, escalations based on inflation indexes, and fair market value adjustments. Certain leases contain contingent rental provisions that include a fixed base rent plus an additional percentage of the restaurant’s sales in excess of stipulated amounts. Our leases generally provide for the payment of common area maintenance, property taxes, insurance and various other use and occupancy costs. In addition, we are the lessee under non-cancelable leases covering certain offices.

Contractually required future minimum cash lease payments under existing operating leases as of December 31, 20172018 are as follows:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2018

$

281,461 

2019

 

285,264 

$

294,191 

2020

 

283,934 

 

296,579 

2021

 

279,816 

 

294,941 

2022

 

278,615 

 

295,290 

2023

 

290,980 

Thereafter

 

2,497,163 

 

2,478,397 

Total minimum lease payments

$

3,906,253 

$

3,950,378 



MinimumTotal minimum lease payments have not been reduced by minimum sublease rentals of $7,359$11,790 due in the future under non-cancelableour subleases.  During fiscal 2018, 2017 and 2016, we recognized sublease income of $2,530,  $2,214, and $2,074, respectively.  Further, minimum lease payments include $90,484 of legally binding minimum lease payments for leases executed, but the lease term has not yet commenced.

Rental expense consists of the following:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Year ended December 31,

Year ended December 31,

2017

 

2016

 

2015

2018

 

2017

 

2016

Minimum rentals

$

278,812 

 

$

255,955 

 

$

227,602 

$

294,854 

 

$

278,812 

 

$

255,955 

Contingent rentals

$

2,317 

 

$

1,811 

 

$

4,542 

$

2,714 

 

$

2,317 

 

$

1,811 

Sublease rental income

$

(2,214)

 

$

(2,074)

 

$

(1,879)

Total

$

297,568 

 

$

281,129 

 

$

257,766 



We have six salessale and leaseback transactions. These transactions do not qualify for sale leaseback accounting because of our deemed continuing involvement with the buyer-lessor due to fixed price renewal options, which results in the transaction being recorded under the financing method. Under the financing method, the assets remain on the consolidated balance sheet and the proceeds from the transactions are recorded as a financing liability.  A portion of lease payments are applied as payments of deemed principal and imputed interest. The deemed landlord financing liability was $2,630$2,390 and $2,854$2,630 as of December 31, 2017,2018, and 2016,2017, respectively, with the current portion of the liability included in accrued liabilities, and the remaining portion included in other liabilities in the consolidated balance sheet.

58

62


 

Table of Contents

 

9.12. Earnings Per Share

Basic earnings per share is calculated by dividing income available to common shareholders by the weighted-average number of shares of common stock outstanding during each period. Diluted earnings per share (“diluted EPS”) is calculated using income available to common shareholders divided by diluted weighted-average shares of common stock outstanding during each period. Potentially dilutive securities include shares of common stock underlying SOSARs and non-vested stock awards (collectively “stock awards”). Diluted EPS considers the impact of potentially dilutive securities except in periods in which there is a loss because the inclusion of the potential common shares would have an anti-dilutive effect. Stock awards are excluded from the calculation of diluted EPS in the event they are subject to performance conditions or antidilutive. The following stock awards were excluded from the calculation of diluted EPS:



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



Year ended December 31,



2017

 

2016

 

2015

Stock awards subject to performance conditions

 

217 

 

 

263 

 

 

266 

Stock awards that were antidilutive

 

1,695 

 

 

1,316 

 

 

289 

Total stock awards excluded from diluted earnings per share

 

1,912 

 

 

1,579 

 

 

555 

The following table sets forth the computations of basic and diluted earnings per share:  



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



Year ended December 31,



2018

 

2017

 

2016

Net income

$

176,553 

 

$

176,253 

 

$

22,938 

Shares:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Weighted-average number of common shares outstanding

 

27,823 

 

 

28,491 

 

 

29,265 

Dilutive stock awards

 

139 

 

 

70 

 

 

505 

Diluted weighted-average number of common shares outstanding

 

27,962 

 

 

28,561 

 

 

29,770 

Basic earnings per share

$

6.35 

 

$

6.19 

 

$

0.78 

Diluted earnings per share

$

6.31 

 

$

6.17 

 

$

0.77 



The following stock awards were excluded from the calculation of diluted EPS:





 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



Year ended December 31,



2017

 

2016

 

2015

Net income

$

176,253 

 

$

22,938 

 

$

475,602 

Shares:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Weighted average number of common shares outstanding

 

28,491 

 

 

29,265 

 

 

31,092 

Dilutive stock awards

 

70 

 

 

505 

 

 

402 

Diluted weighted average number of common shares outstanding

 

28,561 

 

 

29,770 

 

 

31,494 

Basic earnings per share

$

6.19 

 

$

0.78 

 

$

15.30 

Diluted earnings per share

$

6.17 

 

$

0.77 

 

$

15.10 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



Year ended December 31,



2018

 

2017

 

2016

Stock awards subject to performance conditions

 

95 

 

 

217 

 

 

263 

Stock awards that were antidilutive

 

1,741 

 

 

1,695 

 

 

1,316 

Total stock awards excluded from diluted earnings per share

 

1,836 

 

 

1,912 

 

 

1,579 

 

10.13. Commitments and Contingencies

Purchase Obligations

We enter into various purchase obligations in the ordinary course of business, generally of a short termshort-term nature. Those that are binding primarily relate to commitments for food purchases and supplies, amounts owed under contractor and subcontractor agreements, orders submitted for equipment for restaurants under construction, and marketing initiatives and corporate sponsorships.

Litigation

Data Security Incident 

In April 2017, our information security team detected unauthorized activity on the network that supports payment processing for our restaurants, and immediately began an investigation with the help of leading computer security firms. We also self-reported the issue to payment card processors and law enforcement. Our investigation detected malware designed to access payment card data from cards used at point-of-sale devices at most Chipotle restaurants, primarily in the period from March 24, 2017 through April 18, 2017. The malware searched for track data, which may include cardholder name, card number, expiration date, and internal verification codes; however, no other customer information was affected. We have removed the malware from our systems and continue to evaluate ways to enhance our security measures. We expect that substantially all of our investigation costs will be covered by insurance; however, we may incur legal expenses in excess of our insurance coverage limits associated with the data security incident in future periods. We will recognize these expenses as services are received.  

 During the year endedAs of December 31, 2017,2018, we recorded an expensehad a balance of $30,000 ($18,234 after tax), or $0.64 per diluted earnings per share, as$29,289 included in accrued liabilities on the consolidated balance sheet which represents an estimate of potential liabilities associated with anticipated claims and assessments by payment card networks in connection with the data security incident. We may ultimately be subject to liabilities greater than or less than the amount accrued. The expense is recorded in general and administrative expenses in our consolidated statement of income and a corresponding liability in accrued liabilities on our consolidated balance sheet.

59


Table of Contents

Litigation Arising from Data Security Incident 

On May 4, 2017, Bellwether Community Credit Union filed a purported class action complaint in the United States District Court for the District of Colorado alleging that we negligently failed to provide adequate security to protect the payment card information of customers of the plaintiffs and those of other similarly situated credit unions, banks and other financial institutions alleged to be part of the putative class, causing those institutions to suffer financial losses. The complaint also claims we were negligent per se based on alleged violations of Section 5 of the Federal Trade Commission Act and similar state laws.  The plaintiff seeks monetary damages, injunctive relief and attorneys’ fees.  On May 26, 2017, Alcoa Community Credit Union filed a purported class action complaint in the U. S. District Court for the District of Colorado making substantially the same allegations as the Bellwether complaint and seeking substantially the same relief. The Bellwether and Alcoa cases have been consolidated and will proceed as a single action. On October 24, 2018, the court issued an order granting in part and denying in part our motion to dismiss

63


Table of Contents

the consolidated complaint, dismissing all claims other than those brought under state unfair competition laws in California and New Hampshire and plaintiffs’ request for declaratory relief. On December 10, 2018, the plaintiffs filed a second amended consolidated complaint, and on January 25, 2019 we filed a motion to dismiss the second amended complaint.

On June 9, 2017, Todd Gordon filed a purported class action complaint in the U. S. District Court for the District of Colorado alleging that we negligently failed to provide adequate security to protect the payment card information of the plaintiff and other similarly situated customers alleged to be part of the putative class, causing some customers to suffer alleged injuries and others to be at risk of possible future injuries. The complaint also claims we were negligent per se based on alleged violations of Section 5 of the Federal Trade Commission Act and similar state laws, and also alleges breach of contract, unjust enrichment, and violations of the Arizona Consumer Fraud Act. Additionally, on August 21, 2017, Greg Lawson and Judy Conard filed a purported class action complaint in the U. S. District Court for the District of Colorado making allegations substantially similar to those in the Gordon complaint, and stating substantially similar claims as well as claims under the Colorado Consumer Protection Act. The Gordon and Lawson/Conard cases have been consolidated and will proceed as a single action. On September 26, 2018, the court issued an order granting in part, and denying in part, our motion to dismiss the consolidated complaint, including a dismissal of the negligence and unjust enrichment claims in their entirety.

We intend to continue to vigorously defend each of the aforementioned cases, but it is not possible at this time to reasonably estimate the outcome of or any potential liability from these cases. Although certain fees and costs associated with the data security incident and the aforementioned litigation to date have been paid or reimbursed by our cyber liability insurer, the ultimate amount of liabilities arising from the litigation may be in excess of the limits of our applicable insurance coverage.coverage and the amounts included in accrued liabilities in relation to the data security incident.  

Receipt of Grand Jury Subpoenas

On January 28, 2017,2016, we were served with a Federal Grand Jury Subpoena from the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California in connection with an official criminal investigation being conducted by the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Central District of California, in conjunction with the U.S. Food and Drug Administration’s Office of Criminal Investigations. The subpoena requiresrequired the production of documents and information related to company-wide food safety matters dating back to January 1, 2013. We received a follow-up subpoena on July 19, 2017, requesting information related to an illness incidentsincident associated with a single Chipotle restaurant in Sterling, Virginia.Virginia, and another follow-up subpoena on February 14, 2018 requesting information related to an illness incident associated with a single Chipotle restaurant in Los Angeles, California. We intend to continue to fully cooperate in the investigation.  It is not possible at this time to determine whether we will incur, or to reasonably estimate the amount of, any fines or penalties in connection with the investigation pursuant to which the subpoena wassubpoenas were issued.

Shareholder Derivative Actions

On April 6, 2016, Uri Skorski filed a shareholder derivative action in Colorado state court in Denver, Colorado, alleging that our Board of Directors and officers breached their fiduciary duties in connection with our alleged failure to disclose material information about our food safety policies and procedures, and also alleging that our Board of Directors and officers breached their fiduciary duties in connection with allegedly excessive compensation awarded from 2011 to 2015 under our stock incentive plan. On April 14, 2016, Mark Arnold and Zachary Arata filed a shareholder derivative action in Colorado state court in Denver, Colorado, making largely the same allegations as the Skorski complaint. On May 26, 2016, the court issued an order consolidating the Skorski and Arnold/Arata actions into a single case. On August 8, 2016, Sean Gubricky filed a shareholder derivative action the U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado, alleging that our Board of Directors and certain officers failed to institute proper food safety controls and policies, issued materially false and misleading statements in violation of federal securities laws, and otherwise breached their fiduciary duties.  On September 1, 2016, Ross Weintraub filed a shareholder derivative action in Colorado state court in Denver, Colorado, making largely the same allegations as the Gubricky complaint. On March 27, 2017, the Weintraub case was consolidated with the Skorski and Arnold/Arata action into a single case.  On December 27, 2016, Cyrus Lashkari filed a shareholder derivative action the U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado, making largely the same allegations as the foregoing shareholder derivative complaints.  Each of these actions purports to state a claim for damages on our behalf, and is based on statements in our SEC filings and related public disclosures, as well as media reports and company records. We have reached an agreement in principle to settle the foregoing actions, and have recorded a corresponding liability in accrued liabilities on our consolidated balance sheet; the proposed settlement has been preliminarily approved by the U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado, with a final approval hearing set for March 15, 2018.

60


Table of Contents

On July 28, 2017, Mark Blau filed a shareholder derivative action in the U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado, making allegations similar to those of the several shareholder derivative actions described above, and adding further allegations related to the Board’s investigation of the foregoing matters, as well as customer illnesses and operational issues associated with two Chipotle restaurants in July 2017.  The action purports to state claims for damages on our behalf, and is based on statements in our SEC filings and related public disclosures, as well as media reports and company records.  On February 2, 2018, the Court stayed this matter pending the outcome of the March 15, 2018 settlement approval hearing in the consolidated Gubricky actions described above.   

Shareholder Class Actions   

On January 8, 2016, Susie Ong filed a complaint in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York on behalf of a purported class of purchasers of shares of our common stock between February 4, 2015 and January 5, 2016. The complaint purports to state claims against us, each of the co-Chief Executive Officersco-chief executive officers serving during the claimed class period and the Chief Financial Officer under Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and related rules, based on our alleged failure during the claimed class period to disclose material information about our quality controls and safeguards in relation to consumer and employee health. The complaint asserts that those failures and related public statements were false and misleading and that, as a result, the market price of our stock was artificially inflated during the claimed class period. The complaint seeks damages on behalf of the purported class in an unspecified amount, interest, and an award of reasonable attorneys’ fees, expert fees and other costs. On March 8, 2017, the court granted our motion to dismiss the complaint, with leave to amend. The plaintiff filed an amended complaint on April 7, 2017. On June 7, 2017, ChipotleMarch 22, 2018, the court granted our motion to dismiss, with prejudice. On April 20, 2018, the plaintiffs filed a motion for relief from the judgment and seeking leave to dismiss thefile a third amended complaint, and briefing on that motion was completed on September 6, 2017.   November 20, 2018, the court denied the motion.  On December 20, 2018, the plaintiff initiated an appeal to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit.

Additionally, on July 20, 2017, Elizabeth Kelley filed a complaint in the U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado on behalf of a purported class of purchasers of shares of our common stock between February 5, 2016 and July 19, 2017, with claims and factual allegations similar to the Ong complaint, based primarily on media reports regarding illnesses associated with a Chipotle restaurant in Sterling, Virginia. A responseWe filed a motion to dismiss the amended complaint in that matter is due on February 12, 2018.  2018, and a ruling on the motion remains pending. 

We intend to continue to vigorously defend thesethe Ong and Kelley cases, vigorously, but it is not possible at this time to reasonably estimate the outcome of or any potential liability from theeither of these cases.

Miscellaneous 

Miscellaneous

64


Table of Contents

We are involved in various other claims and legal actions that arise in the ordinary course of business. We do not believe that the ultimate resolution of these actions will have a material adverse effect on our financial position, results of operations, liquidity or capital resources. However, a significant increase in the number of these claims, or one or more successful claims under which we incur greater liabilities than we currently anticipate, could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.  

11.

14. Quarterly Financial Data (Unaudited)

Summarized unaudited quarterly financial data:





 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2017

 

 

 

 

2018

 

 

 

    March 31    

 

    June 30    

 

September 30

 

December 31

 

 

 

    March 31    

 

    June 30    

 

September 30

 

December 31

Revenue

 

 

 

$

1,068,829 

 

$

1,169,409 

 

$

1,128,074 

 

$

1,110,100 

 

 

 

$

1,148,397 

 

$

1,266,520 

 

$

1,225,007 

 

$

1,225,061 

Operating income

 

 

 

$

73,173 

 

$

106,725 

 

$

30,867 

 

$

60,029 

 

 

 

$

92,808 

 

$

67,957 

 

$

57,991 

 

$

39,612 

Net income

 

 

 

$

46,120 

 

$

66,730 

 

$

19,610 

 

$

43,793 

 

 

 

$

59,446 

 

$

46,884 

 

$

38,204 

 

$

32,019 

Basic earnings per share

 

 

 

$

1.60 

 

$

2.33 

 

$

0.69 

 

$

1.56 

 

 

 

$

2.13 

 

$

1.69 

 

$

1.37 

 

$

1.15 

Diluted earnings per share

 

 

 

$

1.60 

 

$

2.32 

 

$

0.69 

 

$

1.55 

 

 

 

$

2.13 

 

$

1.68 

 

$

1.36 

 

$

1.15 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2016

 

 

 

2017

 

 

 

    March 31    

 

    June 30    

 

September 30

 

December 31

 

 

 

    March 31    

 

    June 30    

 

September 30

 

December 31

Revenue

 

 

 

$

834,459 

 

$

998,383 

 

$

1,036,982 

 

$

1,034,560 

 

 

 

$

1,068,829 

 

$

1,169,409 

 

$

1,128,074 

 

$

1,110,100 

Operating income (loss)

 

 

 

$

(46,604)

 

$

40,895 

 

$

9,726 

 

$

30,550 

Net income (loss)

 

 

 

$

(26,432)

 

$

25,596 

 

$

7,799 

 

$

15,975 

Basic earnings (loss) per share

 

 

 

$

(0.88)

 

$

0.88 

 

$

0.27 

 

$

0.55 

Diluted earnings (loss) per share

 

 

 

$

(0.88)

 

$

0.87 

 

$

0.27 

 

$

0.55 

Operating income

 

 

 

$

73,173 

 

$

106,725 

 

$

30,867 

 

$

60,029 

Net income

 

 

 

$

46,120 

 

$

66,730 

 

$

19,610 

 

$

43,793 

Basic earnings per share

 

 

 

$

1.60 

 

$

2.33 

 

$

0.69 

 

$

1.56 

Diluted earnings per share

 

 

 

$

1.60 

 

$

2.32 

 

$

0.69 

 

$

1.55 

 

 

6165


 

Table of Contents

 

ITEM 9.CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE

None.None.  

ITEM  9A.CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

We maintain disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”)) that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in Exchange Act reports is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

As of December 31, 2017,2018, we carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures. Based on the foregoing, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of the end of the period covered by this annual report.

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

There were no changes during the fiscal quarter ended December 31, 20172018 in our internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Exchange Act) that have materially affected or are reasonably likely to materially affect our internal control over financial reporting. 

Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting

The management of Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc. is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting. Our internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Our internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (i) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of our assets; (ii) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, and that our receipts and expenditures are being made only in accordance with authorizations of our management and directors; and (iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of assets that could have a material effect on our financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

Management assessed the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2017,2018, based on the framework set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission in Internal Control—Integrated Framework (the “2013 framework”). Based on that assessment, management concluded that, as of December 31, 2017,2018, our internal control over financial reporting was effective based on the criteria established in the 2013 framework.

Our independent registered public accounting firm, Ernst & Young LLP, has issued an attestation report on the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2017.2018. This report follows.

 

62

66


 

Table of Contents

 

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

To the Shareholders and Board of Directors of Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc.

Opinion on Internal Control over Financial Reporting

We have audited Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc.’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2017,2018, based on criteria established in Internal Control-IntegratedControl Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (2013 framework) (the COSO criteria). In our opinion, Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc. (the Company) maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2017,2018, based on the COSO criteria.

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB), the consolidated balance sheets as of December 31, 20172018 and 2016,2017, and the related consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income, shareholders’ equity and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2017,2018, and the related notes of the Company and our report dated February 8, 20187, 2019 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.

Basis for Opinion

The Company’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting included in the accompanying Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects.

Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

Definition and Limitations of Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

/s/ Ernst & Young LLP

Denver, ColoradoIrvine, California

February 8, 20187, 2019



63

67


 

Table of Contents

 

ITEM 9B.OTHER INFORMATION

None.

None.

PART III

ITEM 10.DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

Incorporated by reference from the definitive proxy statement for our 20182019 annual meeting of shareholders, which will be filed no later than 120 days after December 31, 2017.2018.

ITEM 11.EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

Incorporated by reference from the definitive proxy statement for our 20182019 annual meeting of shareholders, which will be filed no later than 120 days after December 31, 2017.2018.

ITEM 12.SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS

Securities Authorized for Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans

The following table presents information regarding options and rights outstanding under our equity compensation plans as of December 31, 2017.2018. All options/SOSARs reflected are options to purchase common stock.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(a)
Number of Securities
to be Issued Upon
Exercise of Outstanding
Options and Rights(1)

 

 

(b)
Weighted-Average
Exercise Price of
Outstanding Options and
Rights(1) 

 

(c)
Number of Securities
Remaining Available for
Future Issuance Under
Equity Compensation Plans
(excluding securities
reflected in column (a))(2) 

(a)
Number of Securities
to be Issued Upon
Exercise of Outstanding
Options and Rights(1)

 

 

(b)
Weighted-Average
Exercise Price of
Outstanding Options and
Rights(1) 

 

(c)
Number of Securities
Remaining Available for
Future Issuance Under
Equity Compensation Plans
(excluding securities
reflected in column (a))(2) 

Equity Compensation Plans Approved by Security Holders

2,211,600 

 

$

480.09 

 

2,032,484 2,374,955 

 

$

474.51 

 

2,871,440 

Equity Compensation Plans Not Approved by Security Holders

None

 

N/A

 

None

None

 

 

N/A

 

None

Total

2,211,600 

 

$

480.09 

 

2,032,484 2,374,955 

 

$

474.51 

 

2,871,440 

__________________

(1)

Includes shares issuable in connection with awards with performance and market conditions, which will be issued based on achievement of performance criteria associated with the awards, with the number of shares issuable dependent on our level of performance. The weighted-average exercise price in column (b) includes the weighted-average exercise price of SOSARs only.

(2)

Includes 2,625,516 shares remaining available under the Amended and Restated Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc. 2011 Stock Incentive Plan, and 245,924 shares remaining available under the Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc. Employee Stock Purchase Plan. In addition to being available for future issuance upon exercise of SOSARs or stock options that may be granted after December 31, 2018, all of the shares available for grant under the Amended and Restated Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc. 2011 Stock Incentive Plan may instead be issued in the form of restricted stock, restricted stock units, performance shares or other equity-based awards. Each share underlying a full value award such as restricted stock, restricted stock units or performance shares counts as two shares used against the total number of securities authorized under the plan.



(1)Includes shares issuable in connection with awards with performance and market conditions, which will be issued based on achievement of performance criteria associated with the awards, with the number of shares issuable dependent on our level of performance. The weighted-average exercise price in column (b) includes the weighted-average exercise price of SOSARs only.

(2)Includes 1,786,198 shares remaining available under the Amended and Restated Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc. 2011 Stock Incentive Plan, and 246,286 shares remaining available under the Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc. Employee Stock Purchase Plan. In addition to being available for future issuance upon exercise of SOSARs or stock options that may be granted after December 31, 2017, all of the shares available for grant under the Amended and Restated Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc. 2011 Stock Incentive Plan may instead be issued in the form of restricted stock, restricted stock units, performance shares or other equity-based awards. Each share underlying a full value award such as restricted stock, restricted stock units or performance shares counts as two shares used against the total number of securities authorized under the plan. 

Additional information for this item is incorporated by reference from the definitive proxy statement for our 20182019 annual meeting of shareholders, which will be filed no later than 120 days after December 31, 2017.2018.

ITEM 13.CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE

Incorporated by reference from the definitive proxy statement for our 20182019 annual meeting of shareholders, which will be filed no later than 120 days after December 31, 2017.2018.

64


Table of Contents

ITEM 14.PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES

Incorporated by reference from the definitive proxy statement for our 20182019 annual meeting of shareholders, which will be filed no later than 120 days after December 31, 2017.

2018.

 

65

68


 

Table of Contents

 

PART IV

ITEM 15.EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES

1. All Financial statements

Consolidated financial statements filed as part of this report are listed under Item 8. “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.”

2. Financial statement schedules

No schedules are required because either the required information is not present or is not present in amounts sufficient to require submission of the schedule, or because the information required is included in the consolidated financial statements or the notes thereto.

3. Exhibits 



 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 



 

Description of Exhibit Incorporated Herein by Reference

Exhibit Number

Exhibit Description

Form

File No.

Filing Date

Exhibit Number

Filed Herewith

3.1 

Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc.

10-Q

001-32731

October 26, 2016

3.1

 

3.2 

Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc. Amended and Restated Bylaws

8-K

001-32731

October 6, 2016

3.1

 

4.1 

Form of Stock Certificate for Shares of Common Stock

10-K

001-32731

February 10, 2012

4.1

 

10.1†

Amended and Restated Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc. 2006 Stock Incentive Plan

10-K

001-32731

February 17, 2011

10.2

 

10.1.1†

Form of 2011 Stock Appreciation Rights Agreement

10-K

001-32731

February 17, 2011

10.2.10

 

10.1.2†

Form of 2011 Performance-Based Stock Appreciation Rights Agreement

10-K

001-32731

February 17, 2011

10.2.11

 

10.2†

Amended and Restated Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc. 2011 Stock Incentive Plan

10-Q

001-32731

October 26, 2016

10.1

 

10.2.1†

Form of Board Restricted Stock Units Agreement

10-Q

001-32731

July 22, 2014

10.1

 

10.2.2†

Form of Stock Appreciation Rights Agreement

10-Q

001-32731

April 20, 2012

10.1

 

10.2.3†

Form of Performance-Based Stock Appreciation Rights Agreement

10-Q

001-32731

April 20, 2012

10.2

 

10.2.4†

Form of 2014 Stock Appreciation Rights Agreement

10-K

001-32731

February 7, 2017

10.2.4

 

10.2.5†

Form of 2014 Performance-Based Stock Appreciation Rights Agreement

10-K

001-32731

February 7, 2017

10.2.5

 

10.2.6†

Form of 2015 Performance Share Agreement

10-Q

001-32731

April 22, 2015

10.2

 

10.2.7†

Form of 2016 Stock Appreciation Rights Agreement

10-Q

001-32731

April 27, 2016

10.1

 

   10.2.8†

Form of 2016 Performance Share Agreement

10-Q

001-32731

April 27, 2016

10.2

 

10.2.8.1†

Amendment to 2016 Performance Share Agreement

8-K

001-32731

March 30, 2017

10.1

 

 10.2.9†

Form of 2017 Stock Appreciation Rights Agreement

-

-

-

-

X

10.2.10†

Form of 2017 Restricted Stock Units Agreement

-

-

-

-

X

10.2.11†

Form of 2017 Performance Share Agreement

10-Q

001-32731

July 26, 2017

10.2

 

10.2.12†

Form of Staff Restricted Stock Units Agreement

-

-

-

-

X

10.3 

Amended and Restated Registration Rights Agreement dated January 31, 2006 among Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc., McDonald’s Corporation and certain shareholders

10-K

001-32731

March 17, 2006

10.6

 

10.4†

Board Pay Policies

10-Q

001-32731

July 26, 2017

10.1

 

10.5†

Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc. Supplemental Deferred Investment Plan

10-K

001-32731

February 23, 2007

10.11

 

10.5.1†

Amendment No. 1 to Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc. Supplemental Deferred Investment Plan

10-Q

001-32731

August 1, 2007

10.1

 



 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 



 

Description of Exhibit Incorporated Herein by Reference

Exhibit Number

Exhibit Description

Form

File No.

Filing Date

Exhibit Number

Filed Herewith

3.1 

Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc.

10-Q

001-32731

October 26, 2016

3.1

 

3.2 

Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc. Amended and Restated Bylaws

8-K

001-32731

October 6, 2016

3.1

 

4.1 

Form of Stock Certificate for Shares of Common Stock

10-K

001-32731

February 10, 2012

4.1

 

10.1†

Amended and Restated Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc. 2006 Stock Incentive Plan

10-K

001-32731

February 17, 2011

10.2

 

10.1.1†

Form of 2011 Stock Appreciation Rights Agreement

10-K

001-32731

February 17, 2011

10.2.10

 

10.1.2†

Form of 2011 Performance-Based Stock Appreciation Rights Agreement

10-K

001-32731

February 17, 2011

10.2.11

 

10.1.3

Stock Appreciation Rights Agreement between Steve Ells and Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc.

10-Q

001-32731

April 26, 2018

10.1

 

10.2†

Amended and Restated Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc. 2011 Stock Incentive Plan

8-K

001-32731

May 24, 2018

10.1

 

10.2.1†

Form of Board Restricted Stock Units Agreement

10-Q

001-32731

July 22, 2014

10.1

 

10.2.2†

Form of Stock Appreciation Rights Agreement

10-Q

001-32731

April 20, 2012

10.1

 

10.2.3†

Form of Performance-Based Stock Appreciation Rights Agreement

10-Q

001-32731

April 20, 2012

10.2

 

10.2.4†

Form of 2014 Stock Appreciation Rights Agreement

10-K

001-32731

February 7, 2017

10.2.4

 

10.2.5†

Form of 2014 Performance-Based Stock Appreciation Rights Agreement

10-K

001-32731

February 7, 2017

10.2.5

 

10.2.6†

Form of 2015 Performance Share Agreement

10-Q

001-32731

April 22, 2015

10.2

 

10.2.7†

Form of 2016 Stock Appreciation Rights Agreement

10-Q

001-32731

April 27, 2016

10.1

 

10.2.8†

Form of 2016 Performance Share Agreement

10-Q

001-32731

April 27, 2016

10.2

 

10.2.8.1†

Amendment to 2016 Performance Share Agreement

8-K

001-32731

March 30, 2017

10.1

 

10.2.11†

Form of 2017 Performance Share Agreement

10-Q

001-32731

July 26, 2017

10.2

 

10.2.13

Retention Agreement, dated January 9, 2018, between Jack Hartung and Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc.

8-K

001-32731

January 12, 2018

10.1

 

10.3 

Amended and Restated Registration Rights Agreement dated January 31, 2006 among Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc., McDonald’s Corporation and certain shareholders

10-K

001-32731

March 17, 2006

10.6

 

10.3.1

Retention Agreement, dated January 9, 2018, between Mark Crumpacker and Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc.

8-K

001-32731

January 12, 2018

10.2

 

10.4†

Board Pay Policies

10-Q

001-32731

July 26, 2017

10.1

 

10.4.2

Board Pay Policies effective May 22, 2018

8-K

001-32731

May 24, 2018

10.2

 

10.4.3

Retention Agreement, dated January 9, 2018, between Scott Boatwright and Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc.

10-Q

001-32731

April 26, 2018

10.4

 

66

69


 

10.5.2†

Amendment No. 2 to Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc. Supplemental Deferred Investment Plan

10-Q

001-32731

October 31, 2007

10.1

 

10.5†

Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc. Supplemental Deferred Investment Plan

10-K

001-32731

February 23, 2007

10.11

 

10.5.1†

Supplemental Deferred Investment Plan

10-Q

001-32731

July 27, 2018

10.3

 

10.5.2

Retention Agreement, dated January 9, 2018, between Curt Garner and Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc.

10-Q

001-32731

April 26, 2018

10.5

 

10.6†

Form of Director and Officer Indemnification Agreement

8-K

001-32731

March 21, 2007

10.1

 

Form of Director and Officer Indemnification Agreement

8-K

001-32731

March 21, 2007

10.1

 

10.6.1

Offer Letter, dated February 11, 2018, between Brian R. Niccol and Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc.

8-K

001-32731

February 15, 2018

10.1

 

10.7†

Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc. Employee Stock Purchase Plan

10-K

001-32731

February 10, 2012

10.11

 

Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc. Employee Stock Purchase Plan

10-K

001-32731

February 10, 2012

10.11

 

10.7.1

Non-Plan Inducement SOSARs Agreement between Brian R. Niccol and Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc.

S-8

33-223467

March 6, 2018

4.3

 

10.8†

Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc. 2014 Cash Incentive Plan

10-Q

001-32731

July 19, 2013

10.1

 

Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc. 2014 Cash Incentive Plan

10-Q

001-32731

July 19, 2013

10.1

 

10.8.1

Non-Plan Inducement RSUs Agreement between Brian R. Niccol and Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc.

S-8

33-223467

March 6, 2018

4.4

 

10.9

Separation Agreement, dated March 13, 2018, between Mark Crumpacker and Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc.

8-K

001-32731

March 14, 2018

10.1

 

10.10

Investor Agreement dated December 14, 2016 between Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc. and Pershing Square Capital Management, L.P. 

8-K

001-32731

December 19, 2016

10.1

 

Investor Agreement dated December 14, 2016 between Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc. and Pershing Square Capital Management, L.P. 

8-K

001-32731

December 19, 2016

10.1

 

10.11

Registration Rights Agreement dated February 3, 2017, between Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc. and Pershing Square Capital Management, L.P.

10-K

001-32731

February 7, 2017

10.11

 

Registration Rights Agreement dated February 3, 2017, between Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc. and Pershing Square Capital Management, L.P.

10-K

001-32731

February 7, 2017

10.11

 

10.11.1

Form of 2018 CEO SOSARs Agreement

8-K/A

001-32731

April 3, 2018

10.2

 

10.12

Executive Agreement dated May 29, 2017 between Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc. and Scott Boatwright

8-K

001-32731

September 15, 2017

10.1

 

Executive Agreement dated May 29, 2017 between Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc. and Scott Boatwright

8-K

001-32731

September 15, 2017

10.1

 

10.12.1

Form of 2018 Premium-priced SOSARs Agreement

8-K/A

001-32731

April 3, 2018

10.3

 

10.13

Executive Chairman Agreement dated November 28, 2017 between Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc. and Steve Ells

8-K

001-32731

December 1, 2017

10.1

 

Executive Chairman Agreement dated November 28, 2017 between Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc. and Steve Ells

8-K

001-32731

December 1, 2017

10.1

 

10.13.1

Offer Letter, dated March 9, 2018, between Christopher Brandt and Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc.

10-Q

001-32731

April 26, 2018

10.13

 

10.14

Form of 2018 Stock Appreciation Rights Agreement

10-Q

001-32731

April 26, 2018

10.14

 

10.15

Form of 2018 Restricted Stock Units Agreement

10-Q

001-32731

April 26, 2018

10.15

 

10.16

Form of 2018 Restricted Stock Units Agreement - 12 month

10-Q

001-32731

April 26, 2018

10.16

 

21.1

Subsidiaries of Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc.

-

-

-

X

Subsidiaries of Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc.

-

-

-

X

23.1

Consent of Ernst & Young LLP (as the independent registered public accounting firm of Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc.)

-

-

-

X

Consent of Ernst & Young LLP (as the independent registered public accounting firm of Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc.)

-

-

-

X

24.1

Power of Attorney (included on signature page of this report)

-

-

-

X

Power of Attorney (included on signature page of this report)

-

-

-

X

31.1

Certification of Chief Executive Officer of Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc. pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

-

-

-

X

Certification of Chief Executive Officer of Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc. pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

-

-

-

X

31.2

Certification of Chief Financial Officer of Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc. pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

-

-

-

X

Certification of Chief Financial Officer of Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc. pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

-

-

-

X

32.1

Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc. pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

-

-

-

X

Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc. pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

-

-

-

X

101

The following financial statements, formatted in XBRL: (i) Consolidated Balance Sheet as of December 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, (ii) Consolidated Statement of Income for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, (iii) Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Income for the years ended December 31 2017, 2016 and 2015, (iv) Consolidated Statement of Shareholders’ Equity for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, (v) Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015; and (vi) Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

-

-

-

X

70


101 

The following financial statements, formatted in XBRL: (i) Consolidated Balance Sheet as of December 31, 2018 and December 31, 2017, (ii) Consolidated Statement of Income for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016, (iii) Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Income for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016, (iv) Consolidated Statement of Shareholders’ Equity for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016, (v) Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016; and (vi) Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

-

-

-

-

X



ITEM 16.FORM 10-K SUMMARY

None.

None.

 

67

71


 

Table of Contents

 

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.



 

CHIPOTLE MEXICAN GRILL, INC.

 

 

By:

/s/    JOHN R. HARTUNG

Name:

John R. Hartung

Title:

Chief Financial Officer

Date: February 8, 20187, 2019

POWER OF ATTORNEY

KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS, that each person whose signature appears below constitutes and appoints Steve EllsBrian Niccol and John Hartung, and each of them, his or her true and lawful attorneys-in-fact, each with full power of substitution, for him or her in any and all capacities, to sign any amendments to this report on Form 10-K and to file the same, with exhibits thereto and other documents in connection therewith, with the Securities and Exchange Commission, hereby ratifying and confirming all that each of said attorneys-in-fact or their substitute or substitutes may do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.



 

 

 

 

Signature

 

Date

 

Title

/s/    STEVE ELLSBRIAN NICCOL

 

February 8, 20187, 2019

 

Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board of Directors

    (principal executive officer)

Steve EllsBrian Niccol

 

 

 

 

/s/    JOHN R. HARTUNG

 

February 8, 20187, 2019

 

Chief Financial Officer

    (principal financial and accounting officer)

John R. Hartung

 

 

 

 

/s/    STEVE ELLS

February 7, 2019

Chairman of the Board of Directors

Steve Ells

/s/    ALBERT S. BALDOCCHI

 

February 8, 20187, 2019

 

Director

Albert S. Baldocchi

 

 

 

 

/s/    PAUL CAPPUCCIO

 

February 8, 20187, 2019

 

Director

Paul Cappuccio

 

 

 

 

/s/    NEIL W. FLANZRAICH

 

February 8, 20187, 2019

 

Director

Neil W. Flanzraich

 

 

 

 

/s/    ROBIN S. HICKENLOOPER

 

February 8, 20187, 2019

 

Director

Robin S. Hickenlooper

 

 

 

 

/s/    KIMBAL MUSK

 

February 8, 20187, 2019

 

Director

Kimbal Musk

 

 

 

 

/s/    ALI NAMVAR

 

February 8, 20187, 2019

 

Director

Ali Namvar

 

 

 

 

/s/MATTHEW PAULL

 

February 8, 20187, 2019

 

Director

Matthew Paull

 

 

 

 

 



 

6872