UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K

/X/ ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 20112014

or

/ / TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from _______ to _______

Commission file number 1-14303

AMERICAN AXLE & MANUFACTURING HOLDINGS, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
DELAWARE 38-3161171
(State or other jurisdiction of (I.R.S. Employer
incorporation or organization) Identification No.)
   
ONE DAUCH DRIVE, DETROIT, MICHIGAN 48211-1198
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)
313-758-2000
(Registrant's telephone number, including area code)
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
Title of Each Class Name of Each Exchange on Which Registered
COMMON STOCK, PAR VALUE $0.01 PER SHARE NEW YORK STOCK EXCHANGE
PREFERRED SHARE PURCHASE RIGHTS, PAR VALUE $0.01 PER SHARE NEW YORK STOCK EXCHANGE
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes x No o

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Exchange Act. Yes o No x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes x No o

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See definition of “accelerated filer”, “large accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).    
Large accelerated filer x Accelerated filer o Non-accelerated filer o Smaller reporting company o
(Do not check if small reporting company)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o No x

The closing price of the Common Stock on June 30, 20112014 as reported on the New York Stock Exchange was $11.38$18.89 per share and the aggregate market value of the registrant's Common Stock held by non-affiliates was approximately $785.5$1,426.1 million.

As of February 6, 201219, 2015, the number of shares of the registrant's Common Stock, $0.01 par value, outstanding was 74,983,58775,761,739 shares.

Documents Incorporated by Reference
Portions of the registrant's Annual Report to Stockholders for the year ended December 31, 20112014 and Proxy Statement for use in connection with its Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held on April 26, 2012,30, 2015, to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to Regulation 14A not later than 120 days after December 31, 20112014, are incorporated by reference in Part I (Items 1, 1A, 1B, 2, 3 and 4), Part II (Items 5, 6, 7, 7A, 8, 9, 9A and 9B), Part III (Items 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14) and Part IV (Item 15) of this Report.



AMERICAN AXLE & MANUFACTURING HOLDINGS, INC.
TABLE OF CONTENTS - ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K
 
Year Ended December 31, 20112014
   Page Number
    
 
 
 
 
 
    
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
    
 
 
 
 
    
  
  
  
  
  
  
 
 
 
 
 
 



Part I

Item 1.Business

As used in this report, except as otherwise indicated in information incorporated by reference, references to “our Company,” "we," "our," "us" or “AAM” mean American Axle & Manufacturing Holdings, Inc. (Holdings) and its subsidiaries and predecessors, collectively.

(a)General Development of Business

Holdings, a Delaware corporation, is a successor to American Axle & Manufacturing of Michigan, Inc., a Michigan corporation, pursuant to a migratory merger between these entities in 1999.

(b)Financial Information About Segments

See Item 8, “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data - Note 1311 - Segment and Geographic Information” included in this report.

(c)Narrative Description of Business

Company Overview

We are a Tier I supplier to the automotive industry. We manufacture, engineer, design and validate driveline and drivetrain systems and related components and chassis modules for light trucks, sport utility vehicles (SUVs), passenger cars, crossover vehicles and commercial vehicles. Driveline and drivetrain systems include components that transfer power from the transmission and deliver it to the drive wheels. Our driveline, drivetrain and related products include axles, driveheads, chassis modules, driveshafts, power transfer units, transfer cases, chassis and steering components, driveheads, transmission parts, electric drive systems and metal-formed products. In addition to locations in the United States (U.S.) (Michigan, New York, Ohio, Indiana and Pennsylvania), we also have offices or facilities in Brazil, China, Germany, India, Japan, Luxembourg, Mexico, Poland, Scotland, South Korea, Sweden and Thailand.

We are the principal supplier of driveline components to General Motors Company (GM) for its full-size rear-wheel drive (RWD) light trucks and SUVs manufactured in North America, supplying substantially all of GM's rear axle and front four-wheel drive and all-wheel drive (4WD/AWD) axle requirements for these vehicle platforms. Sales to GM were approximately 73%68% of our totalconsolidated net sales in 20112014, 75%71% in 2013, and 73% in 2010 and 78% in 20092012.

We are the sole-source supplier to GM for certain axles and other driveline products for the life of each GM vehicle program covered by a Lifetime Program Contract (LPC)Contracts and Long Term Program Contracts (collectively, LPCs). Substantially all of our sales to GM are made pursuant to the LPCs. The LPCs have terms equal to the lives of the relevant vehicle programs or their respective derivatives, which typically run 5 to 7 years, and require us to remain competitive with respect to technology, design and quality.
 
We are also the principal supplier ofsupply driveline system products forto FCA US LLC, formerly known as Chrysler Group LLC'sLLC (Chrysler), for heavy-duty Dodge Ram full-size pickup trucks (Dodge Ram program) and its derivatives.derivatives, as well as the AWD Jeep Cherokee and the AWD Chrysler 200. Sales to Chrysler were approximately 8%18% of our totalconsolidated net sales in 20112014, 9%12% in 20102013 and 8%10% in 20092012. In addition to GM and Chrysler, we supply driveline systems and other related components to Volkswagen AG (Volkswagen), Audi AG (Audi), Scania AB, Mack Trucks Inc. (Mack Truck), PACCARHarley-Davidson Inc., Nissan Motor Co., Ltd. (Nissan), Harley-DavidsonPACCAR Inc., Tata Motors,Honda Motor Co., Ltd., Jaguar Land Rover Limited (JLR), Daimler Truck, Deere & Company, Ford Motor Company (Ford), Deere & Company and other original equipment manufacturers (OEMs) and Tier I supplier companies.companies such as Jatco Ltd. and Hino Motors Ltd. Our consolidated net sales to customers other than GM increased 29% to $710.0$1,199.9 million in 20112014 as compared to $563.0$926.7 million in 20102013 and $331.2$792.6 million in 2009.2012.

We estimate our principal served market to be approximately $37$36 billion, based on information available at the end of 20112014. Our principal served market is the global driveline market, which consists of driveline, drivetrain and related components and chassis modules for light trucks, SUVs, passenger cars, crossover vehicles and commercial vehicles.vehicles, in the regions in which we compete.

1





The following chart sets forth the percentage of total revenues attributable to our products for the periods indicated:

Year ended December 31,Year ended December 31,
2011 2010 20092014 2013 2012
Axles and driveshafts81% 81% 75%82% 82% 82%
Drivetrain components, forged products and other19% 19% 25%18% 18% 18%
Total100% 100% 100%100% 100% 100%

Business Strategy

We are focused on profitably growing ourprofitable net sales growth and strengthening our balance sheet by providing exceptional value to our customers, capitalizing on our competitive strengths and continuing to diversify our customer, product and geographic sales mix.mix while providing exceptional value to our customers. Over the past several years, we have implemented a Restructuring, Resizing and Profit Recovery plantaken necessary actions that allowed us to achieve a cost structure in line with current and projected levels of customer demand and market requirements. The plan has proven successful, yieldingmake significant, permanentsustainable structural cost reductions and has allowedwhich have enabled us to drive down our operating breakeven level. These actions positioned us to significantly improve our profitability and free cash flow performance. We expect to benefit from these actions in the future asbe market cost competitive on a global economic conditions and the strength of the automotive industry continue to improve.basis.

While continuingWe have aligned our business strategy to emphasizebuild value for our track record ofkey stakeholders. This strategy emphasizes a commitment to deliver industry leading quality, technology leadership and operational excellence,excellence. By focusing on this commitment, we are focused on accelerating progress on three critical business objectives: profitable sales growth, improving business diversification and strengtheningcan achieve our balance sheet. Thesekey critical business objectives includeof product and customer diversification, globalization and solid financial performance. This strategy includes the following actions:

SustainingMaintain our high quality standards which are the foundation of our product durability and reliability.

AAM has an outstanding daily track record for delivering quality products, having averaged less than 10 discrepant parts per million (PPM) since 2003, as measured by our largest customer.

Our quality performance has resulted in improved warranty performance for our customers. As a result, the cost per vehicle has improved an average of approximately 10% annually since 2006, as measured by our largest customer.

During 2014, our Colfor Minerva Facility in Ohio, Dietronik location in Michigan and Changshu Manufacturing Facility in China were recognized with the GM Supplier Quality Excellence Award for outstanding performance.

Achieve technology leadership by delivering innovative driveline products which improve the diversification of our product portfolio while increasing our total global served market.

AAM's significant investment in research and development (R&D) has resulted in the development of advanced technology products designed to assist our customers in meeting the market demands for improved fuel-efficiency; lower emissions; enhanced power density; advanced, sophisticated electronic controls; improved safety, ride and handling performance; and enhanced reliability and durability for light trucks, SUVs, passenger cars, crossover vehicles and commercial vehicles.

AAM has established a high efficiency product portfolio that is designed to improve axle efficiency and fuel economy through innovative product design technologies. As our customers look to reduce weight through the use of aluminum and other conventional means, AAM is well positioned to offer innovative, industry leading solutions for lightweighting. Our portfolio includes high efficiency axles, aluminum axles and also AWD applications for plug-in hybrid electrical vehicles to full-electric vehicles.

2





AAM's EcoTrac® Disconnecting AWD system is a fuel-efficient and environmentally friendly driveline system that provides OEMs the option of an all-wheel-drive system that disconnects when not needed to improve fuel efficiency and reduce CO2 emissions compared to conventional AWD systems. AAM's EcoTrac® Disconnecting AWD system is featured on the AWD Jeep Cherokee, which was named by Motor Week as its 2014 Best Small Utility Vehicle, and the AWD Chrysler 200. We are currently designing the next generation of our EcoTrac® Disconnecting AWD system which is smaller, lighter in weight and aims to recover up to 90% of fuel penalty, compared to 80% currently.

e-AAM Driveline Systems AB (e-AAM) was created to design and commercialize electric and hybrid driveline systems designed to improve fuel efficiency, reduce CO2 emissions and provide AWD capability. We will continue engineering, developing and commercializing electric and hybrid driveline systems for passenger cars and crossover vehicles. In 2013, we secured a new driveline systems contract featuring patented e-AAMTM hybrid & electric driveline systems technology with Qoros Auto Co., Ltd. in China.

AAM continues to invest in R&D in emerging technology such as torque biasing capability. AAM has developed capabilities in the areas of control systems and mechatronics to further integrate electronic components such as motors, actuators, and sensors into AAM's mechanical technology to enhance vehicle performance and provide superior torque management.

To accelerate AAM's technological advancements, we announced in 2014 our plan to construct an Advanced Technology Development Center (ATDC) at our Detroit Campus. With a $15 to $20 million investment and the estimated creation of 75 to 100 jobs, we plan to open the state-of-the-art center for technology benchmarking, prototype development, advanced technology development, supplier collaboration, customer showcasing and associate training on our future products, processes, and systems by mid-2015.

Sustain our operational excellence and focus on cost management to deliver exceptional value to our customerscustomers.

Our top priority for 2014 has been to flawlessly launch 16 critical programs for our customers. These launches included GM's next generation Heavy Duty pickups and enhance profitability.SUVs (K2XX Program).

Our focus on cost management has led to sustainable structural cost reductions in AAM's fixed cost structurestructure. We continue to focus on cost management through the implementation of the AAM Manufacturing System to improve quality, eliminate waste, and reduced our operating breakeven to a U.S. Seasonally Adjusted Annual Rate of sales
(SAAR) equivalent of approximately 10 million vehicle units.reduce lead time and total costs globally.

We successfully extended ourOur stand alone UAWUnited Automobile, Aerospace and Agricultural Implement Workers of America (UAW) agreement, that covers hourly associates at our Three Rivers Manufacturing Facility, to ensureensures market competitiveness at AAM's largest U.S. facility throughinto 2017. We also successfully negotiated aThe collective bargaining agreementagreements that coverscover our hourly associates at our MSP Industries Corporation and Colfor Manufacturing subsidiary through 2014.Inc. subsidiaries expire in 2017 and 2018, respectively.

AdvancingWith the diversificationclosure of our Detroit Manufacturing Complex (DMC) and innovationCheektowaga Manufacturing Facility (CKMF) in 2012, we have achieved market competitive labor cost structures at each of our global locations.

Diversify our business through the growth of new and existing customer relationships and expansion of our product portfolio to increase our total global served market.portfolio.

WeIn addition to maintaining and building upon our longstanding relationships with GM and Chrysler, we have invested over $1 billionfocused on generating profitable growth with new and existing global OEM customers. New business launches in research2014 and development since 1994, resulting in the development of products2015 include business with industry leading technology for drivelinekey international customers such as Ford, Honda, Jaguar Land Rover, Nissan, Mercedes-Benz and drivetrain systems and related components for light trucks, SUVs, passenger cars, crossover vehicles and commercial vehicles.others.

3





We have accelerated the development and launch of products for passenger cars and crossover vehicles and the global light truck and commercial vehicle markets. We have approximately $1.1 billion825 million of new and incremental business backlog launching from 20122015 to 2014,2017, of which approximately two-thirds80% relates to AWD and RWD applications for passenger cars, crossover vehicles and driveline applications for the commercial vehicle market.

In 2010, we entered into a joint venture with Saab Automobile AB (Saab). The new company, e-AAM Driveline Systems AB (e-AAM), will design and commercialize electric all-wheel-drive (eAWD) systems designed to improve fuel efficiency up to 30 percent, reduce CO2 emissions and provide all-wheel-drive capability. e-AAM engineers and develops eAWD hybrid driveline systems for passenger cars and crossover vehicles that can be easily integrated into existing platforms, minimizing vehicle architecture changes.


2


AAM also won an industry-first order for our EcoTrac™ disconnecting AWD technology. AAM's EcoTrac™ AWD system is a fuel-efficient and environmentally friendly driveline system that further enhances AAM's technology leadership position by providing OEMs the option of an all-wheel-drive system that disconnects when not needed to improve fuel efficiency and reduce CO2 emissions compared to conventional AWD systems. AAM's EcoTrac™ AWD system will be featured on major global passenger car and crossover vehicle programs beginning in 2013. The EcoTrac™ brand includes this AWD fuel economy optimization system, eAWD systems and a full range of high-efficiency axles.

In 2011, AAM was selected as a finalist for the 2012 Automotive News PACE Award (Premier Automotive Suppliers' Contribution to Excellence) for our industry-first cast iron to cast iron laser welding process in the manufacture of AAM's TracRite® Center Differential for Audi.  PACE awards recognize innovation in automotive suppliers' products, manufacturing processes and information technology. 

Growing new customer relationships to improve the diversification of our customer base and product portfolio.

In addition to maintaining and building upon our long standing relationships with GM and Chrysler, we have focused on generating profitable growth with new and existing global OEM customers, as well as commercial vehicle, off-road and emerging market OEMs. As a result, new business launches in 2011 through 2013 include business with Volkswagen, Audi, Nissan, Ford, Mercedes-Benz, Daimler Truck, Tata Motors, Jaguar Land Rover, Volvo Powertrain Group and Navistar.

Approximately 75%70% of the awards in our new and incremental business backlog launching from 20122015 to 2014 are2017 is for customers other than GM. In addition, we are quoting onhave over $1 billion in quoted and emerging new business opportunities. These opportunities would allow us to continue the diversification and expansion of our customer base, product portfolio and global footprint. Over 90%Substantially all of these opportunities are for customers other than GM.

IncreasingWe also continue to evaluate and consider strategic growth investments to accelerate the profitable growth and diversification of our business.

Achieve globalization by increasing our presence in global growth markets to support our customers' global platforms and establish regional cost competitiveness.customers' platforms.

As our customers continue to design their products for global markets, they will continue to require global support from their suppliers. For this reason, it is critical that we maintain a global presence in these markets in order to remain competitive for new contracts. Over the past few years, we have significantly increased our installed capacity in cost competitive global growth markets to support current programs and future opportunities. Specific actions includeincluded expanding facilitiescapacity in Brazil, China, Mexico, Poland, Thailand and Polandthe U.S. and constructing new facilities in IndiaMexico and Thailand.the U.S.

In 2011, we also expanded our existingOur joint venture (JV) with Hefei Automobile Axle Co., Ltd. (HAAC), a subsidiary of the JAC Group (Anhui Jianghuai Automotive Group Co., Ltd.) to include, which includes 100% of HAAC's light commercial axle business. By adding thebusiness, continues to be a strong advantage for building relationships with leading Chinese light and medium duty commercial axle business, this expanded joint venture willtruck manufacturers. We supply front and rear beam axles to several leading Chinese light truck manufacturers, including JAC and BAIC Foton, making AAM the second largest axle supplier in China 'sChina's light commercial truck segment.

Approximately 50%60% of our $1.1 billion825 million of new and incremental business backlog launching from 20122015 to 20142017 is for end use markets outside the U.S. and approximately 70%85% has been sourced to our manufacturing facilities outside the U.S.

Achieve solid financial performance to build value for our key stakeholders.

Over the past five years, AAM's compound annual growth rate (CAGR) for sales has exceeded the growth rate of the industry. We expect AAM's new and incremental business backlog will continue to drive our sales to grow at a rate that is higher than the industry through 2017, based on current industry estimates.

We have established a cost competitive, operationally flexible global manufacturing, engineering and sourcing footprint to increase our presence in global growth markets, support global product development initiatives and establish regional cost competitiveness. This includes having manufacturing and engineering facilities in Brazil, China, Germany, India, Mexico, Poland, Sweden, Thailand and the U.S.

In 2013, we successfully closed on over $1.25 billion in new and amended financing agreements. As a result, we reduced our weighted average interest cost, extended our debt maturities and improved debt covenant terms and conditions. By taking advantage of favorable market conditions, we improved our flexibility to manage and grow our business and to support AAM's long-term strategic objectives. As of December 31, 2014, we had over $800 million in available liquidity and no significant debt maturities until 2018.

4





Competition and Strengths
 
We compete with a variety of independent suppliers and distributors, as well as with the in-house operations of certain OEMs. Our principal competitors include Dana Holding Corporation, GKN plc, Magna International Inc., ZF Friedrichshafen AG, Linamar Corporation, Meritor Inc. and the in-house operations of various global OEMs, such as Chrysler and Ford.OEMs. The sector is also attracting new competitors, from Asia, some of whom are entering both of our product linessegment through the acquisition of non-core OEM non-core operations.
 

With a focus on engineering and manufacturing, we support our business strategy and differentiate ourselves through the following strengths:

Outstandingoutstanding long-term daily track records on quality, warranty, reliability, delivery and launch performance -performance. We reduced our discrepant parts per million (“PPM”)PPM performance, as measured by our largest customer, from 13,441 PPM in 1994 to an average of less than 10 PPM currently, a level which we have sustained for each of the past eightlast 10 years. We also have a strong track record of successfully supporting new product, process and

3


facility launches.

Demonstrated ability to achieve cost savings - We reduced our operating breakeven to a U.S. SAAR equivalent of approximately 10 million vehicle units.

As global OEM’s race to meet tighter fuel efficiency emissions standards, the automotive industry is entering a resultnew, more advanced phase of our 2008 labor agreements at our original U.S. locations, we converted the former fixed legacy labor cost structure to a highly flexible, competitiveinnovation and variable cost structure.

We continuously evaluate the need to rationalize excess capacity through consolidation, divestiture, idling or closing facilities to maximize productivitydesign. This encompasses independent drive vehicles, hybrid and capacity utilizationelectric vehicles, advanced powertrain applications and further minimize operating and overhead costs. Thisother equally sophisticated technologies. AAM is evidenced by the following actions:

Cost competitive, operationally flexible global manufacturing, engineering and sourcing footprint - We have re-aligned our global installed capacitymeeting these challenges with an aggressive plan to increase our presenceinvestment in global growth markets, support globaladvanced product, development initiativesprocess and establish regional cost competitiveness. This includes having manufacturing facilities in Brazil, China, India, Mexico, Poland, Thailand and the U.S.

In 2010, we idled our Salem Manufacturing Facility (part of our Colfor Manufacturing operations) and consolidated its operations within our two remaining facilities in Ohio. We also idled and consolidated certain administrative and engineering facilities in Michigan. In 2011, we closed our Spurrier Manufacturing Facility in England.

In the third quarter of 2011, we notified the International UAW of our decision to close the Cheektowaga Manufacturing Facility (CKMF) on or after February 26, 2012, the expiration of our current collective bargaining agreement with the International UAW. We had previously notified the International UAW of our decision to close the Detroit Manufacturing Complex (DMC) on or after February 26, 2012 in the second quarter of 2011. The programs currently sourced to these locations will be moved to other market cost competitive North American facilities. DMC's business will be resourced to Three Rivers Manufacturing Facility, our largest U.S. manufacturing facility, and CKMF's business will be resourced to our facilities in Ohio, Indiana and Mexico.systems technology.

All of our global facilities utilize the AAM Manufacturing System, a business philosophy focused on lean manufacturing designed to facilitate cost reductions, improve quality, reduce inventory and improve our operating flexibility. This philosophy is demonstrated through the following:

Ability to drive homeIn the benefits of market cost competitivenesspast, our largest two facilities, Guanajuato Manufacturing Complex and productivity initiatives - Our Three Rivers Manufacturing Facility, was recentlywere recognized for outstanding performance as a "Shingo Prize" recipient and by being named by IndustryWeek Magazine as one of the 10 best plants in North America, by Industry Week Magazine, which recognizes North American manufacturing facilities that foster productive and competitive work environments and optimize customer satisfaction. The AAM Manufacturing System and associate involvement were noted as key enablers for the plant to be awarded new business.respectively.

Recognition for demonstrating outstanding achievements in manufacturing processes, quality enhancements, productivity improvement and customer satisfaction - Our Guanajuato Manufacturing Complex is a "Shingo Prize" award recipient for Manufacturing Excellence, which focuses on lean manufacturing techniques and promotes world-class business performance through continuous improvements in core manufacturing and business processes.

Industry Trends

See Item 7, “Management's Discussion and Analysis - Industry Trends.”
    
Productive Materials

We believe that we have adequate sources of supply of productive materials and components for our manufacturing needs.  Most raw materials (such as steel) and semi-processed or finished items (such as castings) are available within the geographical regions of our operating facilities from qualified sources in quantities sufficient for our needs.  We currently have contracts with our steel suppliers that ensure continuity of supply to our principal operating facilities in North America.  We also have validation and testing capabilities that enable us to strategically qualify steel sources on a global basis. As we continue to expand our global manufacturing footprint, we will need

4


to rely on suppliers in local markets that have not yet proven their ability to meet our requirements. 

Research and Development (R&D)

We continue to invest in the development of new products, processes and systems to improve efficiency and flexibility in our operations and continue to deliver innovative new products, chassis modules and integrated driveline systems to our customers.

In 20112014, R&D spending, net of customer engineering, design and development recoveries, was $113.6103.9 million as compared to $82.5103.4 million in 20102013 and $67.0123.4 million in 20092012. The focus of this investment continues to be developing innovative driveline and drivetrain systems and related components for light trucks, passenger cars, SUVs, crossover vehicles and commercial vehicles in the global marketplace. Product development in this area includes power transfer units, transfer cases, driveline and transmission differentials, multi-piece driveshafts, constant velocity joints, torque transfer devices, chassis modules and front and rear drive axles. We continue to focus on electronic integration in our existing and future products to advance their performance. We also continue to support the development of hybrid and electric vehicle systems. Special focusemphasis is also placed on the development of products and systems that provide our customers with efficiency,advancements in fuel economyefficiency and emissions reduction advancements.and improved performance metrics such as noise vibration harshness (NVH) and power

5




density. Our efforts in these areas have resulted in the development of prototypes and various configurations of these driveline systems for several OEMs throughout the world.

We have also developed and commercialized a disconnecting AWD system, which strengthens AAM's position as a leader in global driveline systems technology. AAM's EcoTrac® Disconnecting AWD system is an industry-first technology that seamlessly engages AWD functionality while improving fuel efficiency and reducing CO2 emissions. This system is now featured on the award-winning Jeep Cherokee and the Chrysler 200.

AAM also develops and manufactures high-efficiency axle systems through the use of proprietary technologies to optimize product design and lubrication management, while also significantly reducing friction and improving fuel economy. In 2010,2012, AAM launched a high efficiency axle on the Cadillac ATS compact luxury sport sedan and in 2014 we entered into a joint venture with Saab in whichlaunched our high efficiency rear-drive modules on the new company,Cadillac CTS, Motor Trend's 2014 Car of the Year.

Our e-AAM subsidiary engineers and develops eAWDelectric and hybrid driveline systems to be commercialized for passenger cars and crossover vehicles. We have also developedThese systems are designed to improve fuel efficiency by up to 30%, reduce CO2 emissions and commercialized a disconnectingprovide AWD system and established our new EcoTrac™ brandcapability with the additional benefit of fuel-efficient and environment-friendly driveline products, which strengthens AAM's position as a leader in global driveline systems technology. The EcoTrac™ brand includes the eAWD systems, the disconnectingimproved vehicle stability when compared to traditional mechanical AWD systems and a full range of high-efficiency axles. systems.

Through the development of our EcoTrac™ brandEcoTrac® Disconnecting AWD system, our high efficiency axles and our establishment of e-AAM hybrid and electric driveline systems, we have significantly advanced our efforts to improve fuel efficiency and ride and handling performance while reducing emissions.

As our customers move toward ways to reduce vehicle weight through the use of aluminum or other conventional means, AAM is well positioned to offer innovative, industry leading solutions, through proprietary technologies such as PowerLite® axles, PowerDense® gears and PowerFilm® lubricant for passenger car, light truck and AWD applications.

Backlog

We typically enter into agreements with our customers to provide axles or other driveline or drivetrain products for the life of our customers' vehicle programs. Our new and incremental business backlog includes formally awarded programs and incremental content and volume including customer requested engineering changes. Our backlog may be impacted by various assumptions, many of which are provided by our customers based on their long range production plans. These assumptions include future production volume estimates, changes in program launch timing and fluctuation in foreign currency exchange rates.

Our new and incremental business backlog is approximately $1.1 billion825 million for programs launching from 20122015 to 2014.2017. Approximately two-thirds80% of our new and incremental business backlog relates to RWD and AWD applications for passenger cars, crossover vehicles and driveline applications for the commercial vehicle markets. Approximately 50%60% of our new and incremental business backlog will be for end use markets outside the U.S. and approximately 70%85% of our new business backlog has been sourced to our non-U.S. manufacturing facilities. Approximately 75%70% of the awards in our new and incremental business backlog areis for customers other than GM.  

Patents and Trademarks

We maintain and have pending various U.S. and foreign patents, trademarks and other rights to intellectual property relating to our business, which we believe are appropriate to protect our interest in existing products, new inventions, manufacturing processes and product developments. We do not believe that any single patent or trademark is material to our business nor would expiration or invalidity of any patent or trademark have a material adverse effect on our business or our ability to compete.

5



Cyclicality and Seasonality

Our operations are cyclical because they are directly related to worldwide automotive production, which is itself cyclical and dependent on general economic conditions and other factors. Our business is also moderately seasonal as our major OEM customers historically have an extended shutdown of operations (typically 1-21 to 2 weeks) in conjunction with their model year changeover and an approximate one-week shutdown in December. Accordingly, our quarterly results may reflect these trends.


6




Environmental Matters

We are subject to various federal, state, local and foreign environmental and occupational safety and health laws, regulations and ordinances, including those regulating air emissions, water discharge, waste management and environmental cleanup. We closely monitor our environmental conditions to ensure that we are in compliance with applicable laws, regulations and ordinances. We have made, and will continue to make, capital and other expenditures to comply with environmental requirements, including recurring administrative costs. Such expenditures were not significant in 20112014, 20102013 and 20092012.

Associates

We employ approximately 9,20012,820 associates on a global basis, including our joint venture affiliates, of which approximately 3,0003,810 are employed in the U.S. Approximately 1,6252,300 associates are represented by the United Automobile, Aerospace and Agricultural Implement Workers of America (UAW).UAW. Approximately 335 associates represented by the UAW at our original facilities in Michigan and New York are subject to a collective bargaining agreement that expires February 25, 2012. Approximately 6751,570 of our hourly associates at our Three Rivers Manufacturing Facility in Michigan are subject to a stand alone UAW agreement that expires September 13, 2017. An additional 615730 associates at our MSP Industries Corporation and Colfor Manufacturing, Inc. subsidiaries are represented by the UAW under collective bargaining agreements that expire April 18, 20132017 and June 6, 2014,8, 2018, respectively. In addition, approximately 115110 associates at our Albion Automotive subsidiary in Scotland, approximately 2,4253,475 associates at our Guanajuato Manufacturing Complex in Mexico and approximately 575570 associates at our Araucaria Manufacturing Facility in Brazil are represented by labor unions that are subject to collective bargaining agreements. The current collective bargaining agreement at Albion will expire on March 31, 2014.2017. The collective bargaining agreements in Mexico and Brazil expire annually.

Executive Officers of the Registrant    
Name Age Position
Richard E. Dauch ......................................69Co-Founder, Chairman of the Board & Chief Executive Officer
David C. Dauch ......................................... 4750 Chairman of the Board, President & Chief OperatingExecutive Officer
John J. Bellanti ..........................................57Executive Vice President - Worldwide Operations
Michael K. Simonte ................................... 4851 Executive Vice President & Chief Financial Officer
Alberto L. Satine .......................................58Senior Vice President - Global Driveline Operations
Terry J. Woychowski..................................59Senior Vice President - Advanced Engineering & Quality
Mark S. Barrett .......................................... 5154 Group Vice President - Engineering, Product Development &Program Management, Material Cost Optimization, Procurement and Driveshaft Business Unit
Alberto L. Satine .......................................Steven J. Proctor ...................................... 5558 Group Vice President - Global SalesStrategic & Business Development
David A. Culton .........................................Michael J. Bly ............................................ 4647 President - AAM Europe, Vice President - AAM Corporate
Phillip R. Guys ..........................................David A. Culton ......................................... 49 Vice President - Product EngineeringMaterial Cost Optimization
John E. Jerge ...........................................Nigel J. Francis ........................................ 50President - AAM Americas, Vice President - AAM Corporate
Allan R. Monich..........................................5854 Vice President - Quality, Warranty & Customer SatisfactionCorporate Planning
Inacio N. Moriguchi....................................Philip R. Guys .......................................... 52 Vice President - Operations - AAM - AmericasProduct Engineering & Development
Steven J. Proctor ......................................Donald L. Joseph...................................... 5559 President - AAM Asia, Vice President - AAM Corporate
KevinTerri M. Smith..........................................Kemp ........................................... 5049 Vice President - Driveshaft Business UnitHuman Resources
John S. Sofia ............................................Michael J. Lynch ....................................... 51 Vice President - Commercial Vehicle BusinessFinance & Controller
Thomas J. Szymanski................................Allan R. Monich ......................................... 5061Vice President - Quality, Warranty & Customer Satisfaction
Jon R. Morrison .........................................56President - AAM North America, Vice President - AAM Corporate
John S. Sofia ............................................55 Vice President - Global Program Management
Thomas J. Szymanski ...............................53Vice President - Driveline Manufacturing Services
Norman Willemse ..................................... 5558 Vice President - Metal Formed ProductProducts Business Unit


67



Richard E. Dauch, age 69, is Co-Founder, Chairman of the Board & Chief Executive Officer of AAM, and is also Chairman of the Executive Committee of the Board of Directors. He has been Chief Executive Officer and a member of the Board of Directors since the Company began operations in March 1994. In October 1997, he was named Chairman of the Board of Directors. He was also President of AAM from March 1994 through December 2000. Prior to March 1994, he spent 12 years at the Chrysler Corporation, where he established the just-in-time materials management system and the three-shift manufacturing vehicle assembly process. He is a retired officer from the Chrysler Corporation. Mr. Dauch's last position at Chrysler, in 1991, was Executive Vice President of Worldwide Manufacturing. Mr. Dauch also served as Group Vice President of Volkswagen of America, where he established the manufacturing facilities and organization for the successful launch of the first major automotive transplant in the United States. Mr. Dauch has more than 47 years of experience in the automotive industry. Mr. Dauch was named the 1996 Worldwide Automotive Industry Leader of the Year by the Automotive Hall of Fame, the 1997 Manufacturer of the Year by the Michigan Manufacturers Association, and the 1999 Michiganian of the Year by The Detroit News. In 2003, he received the Harvard Business School of Michigan Business Statesman Award, the Ernst & Young Entrepreneur of the Year Award, and the Northwood University Outstanding Business Leader Award. In 2005, he received the Legend CEO Award from Automation Alley, and in 2006, he received the Shien-Ming Wu Foundation Manufacturing Leadership Award. Mr. Dauch also served as Chairman of the National Association of Manufacturers (N.A.M.), and currently serves on the Board of Directors of that organization. He has lectured extensively on the subject of manufacturing and authored the book, Passion for Manufacturing, which is distributed in colleges and universities globally and in several languages. Richard E. Dauch is the father of David C. Dauch.



David C. Dauch, age 4750, has been Chairman of the Board, President and Chief OperatingExecutive Officer since June 2008.September 2013 and has served on AAM's Board of Directors since April 2009. Prior to that, he served as President and Chief Executive Officer (since September 2012), President & Chief Operating Officer (since June 2008), Executive Vice President & COOChief Operating Officer (since December 2007); Executive Vice President - Commercial & Strategic Development (since January 2005); Senior Vice President, Commercial (since May 2004); Senior Vice President, Sales, Marketing & Driveline Division (since September 2003); Vice President, Manufacturing - Driveline Division (since January 2001); Vice President, Sales and Marketing (since 1998) and Director of Sales, GM Full-Size Truck Programs (since May 1996). Mr. Dauch joined our Company in July 1995 as Manager, Sales Administration. Prior to joining our Company, Mr. Dauch held various positions and served on the Board of Directors at Collins & Aikman Products Company. David C. Dauch is the son of Richard E. Dauch.

John J. Bellanti, age 57, has been Executive Vice President - Worldwide Operations since September 2008. Prior to that,Presently, he served as Group Vice President - Manufacturing Services, Capital Planning & Cost Estimating (since December 2007); Vice President - Manufacturing Services, Capital Planning & Cost Estimating (since July 2006); Vice President - Engineering & Chief Technology Officer (since May 2004); Vice President, Engineering & Product Development (since September 2003); Executive Director, Manufacturing Services (since March 2000); Director, Manufacturing Engineering (since June 1998); Director Advanced Programs (since May 1996) and Plant Manager, Detroit Forge Plant (since joining our Company in March 1994). Prior to joining our Company, Mr. Bellanti, worked 22 years at General Motors in various manufacturing and engineering positions, most recently serving as Production Manager. Mr. Bellanti wasserves on the BoardBoards of Directors of Business Leaders for Michigan, the North American Forging IndustryDetroit Regional Chamber, the Great Lakes Council Boy Scouts of America, the Boys & Girls Clubs of Southeastern Michigan, the Original Equipment Suppliers Association from 1999 through 2003, serving as President of that Association in 2002.and Amerisure Mutual Holdings, Inc. Mr. Dauch also serves on the Miami University Business Advisory Council.

Michael K. Simonte, age 4851, has been Executive Vice President & Chief Financial Officer since December 2011. Simonte previously served as Executive Vice President - Finance & Chief Financial Officer (since February 2009), Group Vice President - Finance & Chief Financial Officer (since December 2007); Vice President - Finance & Chief Financial Officer (since January 2006); Vice President & Treasurer (since May 2004); and Treasurer (since September 2002). Simonte joined AAM in December 1998 as Director, Corporate Finance. Prior to joining our Company, Mr. Simonte served as Senior Manager at the Detroit office of Ernst & Young LLP. Mr. Simonte is a certified public accountant.

Mark S. Barrett, Alberto L. Satine,age 51,58, has been GroupSenior Vice President - Engineering, Product Development & ProcurementGlobal Driveline Operations since December 2011.January 2014. Prior to that, he served as Vice President - Engineering & Product Development (since October 2008), Executive Director, Engineering & Product Development (since January 2008); Executive Director, Axle & Drivetrain (since November 2006); Executive Director, Powertrain, Driveshaft and Halfshaft Engineering (since January 2006); Executive Director, Released and Domestic Programs (since January 2004); Director, Mid Size Axle Programs (since December 1998) and Staff Project Engineer (since joining our Company in March 1994).  Prior to joining our Company, Mr. Barrett served at General Motors for nine years in a variety of manufacturing and engineering positions.   

7



Alberto L. Satine, age 55, has been Group Vice President - Global Sales & Business Development since(since December 2011. Prior to that, he served as2011), Vice President - Strategic & Business Development (since November 2005), Vice President - Procurement (since January 2005); Executive Director, Global Procurement Direct Materials (since January 2004); General Manager, Latin American Driveline Sales and Operations (since August 2003) and General Manager of International Operations (since joining our Company in May 2001). Prior to joining our Company, Mr. Satine held several management positions at Dana Corporation, including the position of President of Dana's Andean Operations in South America from 1997 to 2000 and General Manager of the Spicer Transmission Division in Toledo, Ohio from 1994 to 1997.

David A. Culton,Terry J. Woychowski, age 4659 , has been Senior Vice President - Advanced Engineering & Quality since February 2013. Prior to joining AAM, Mr. Woychowski spent more than 30 years with General Motors, where he held numerous senior management positions including Vice President, Global Quality & Vehicle Launches, Vice President, Global Vehicle Program Management and Global Chief Engineer Full-size Trucks & Executive Director.

Mark S. Barrett, age 54, has been Group Vice President - Program Management, Material Cost Optimization, Procurement and Driveshaft Business Unit since November 2014. Prior to that, he served as Group Vice President - Procurement, Program Management and Driveshaft Business Unit (since August 2013), Group Vice President - Procurement and Program Management (since February 2013), Group Vice President - Engineering & Procurement (since November 2012), Group Vice President - Engineering, Product Development & Procurement (since December 2011), Vice President - Engineering & Product Development (since October 2008), Executive Director, Engineering & Product Development (since January 2008); Executive Director, Axle & Drivetrain (since November 2006); Executive Director, Powertrain, Driveshaft and Halfshaft Engineering (since January 2006); Executive Director, Released and Domestic Programs (since January 2004); Director, Mid Size Axle Programs (since December 1998) and Staff Project Engineer (since joining our Company in March 1994).  Prior to joining our Company, Mr. Barrett served at General Motors for nine years in a variety of manufacturing and engineering positions.   

Steven J. Proctor, age 58, has been Group Vice President - Strategic & Business Development since December 2014. Prior to that, he served as Group Vice President - Global Sales and Business Development (since January 2014); President - AAM Europe, Vice President - AAM Corporate (since June 2012), President - AAM Asia, Vice President - AAM Corporate (since October 2008); Vice President - Sales & Marketing (since June 2004); Executive Director, Driveline Sales & Marketing (since September 2003); President and Chief Operating Officer of AAM do Brasil (since September 1999); Director, GMT-360, I-10/GMT-355 (since December 1998); Director, Worldwide Programs (since February 1998); Director, Strategic Planning (since July 1996) and Director, General Motors Programs (since joining our Company in March 1994). Prior to joining our Company, Mr. Proctor worked for

8




General Motors for 20 years in the areas of product and industrial engineering, production, material management and sales.

Michael J. Bly, age 47, has been President - AAM Europe, Vice President - AAM Corporate since November 2010.joining our Company in January 2014. Prior to joining AAM, he spent more than 27 years with General Motors in a variety of management roles in the areas of powertrain, engineering and electrification. Mr. Bly's position prior to leaving General Motors was Vice President of European Powertrain Engineering.

David A. Culton, age 49, has been Vice President - Material Cost Optimization since January 2014. Prior to that, he served as President - AAM Americas, Vice President - AAM Corporate (since June 2012), President - AAM Europe, Vice President - AAM Corporate (since November 2010), Vice President - Commercial (since September 2009); Vice President - Unibody Vehicle Business Unit (since October 2008); Controller (since April 2007); Executive Director, Sales (since July 2006);  Director, Commercial Analysis (since August 2004); Director, Finance - Operations (Since June 2003); Finance Manager (since August 1999); and Assistant Finance Manager (since joining our Company in September 1998).  Prior to joining our Company, Mr. Culton served at Chrysler Corporation for 10 years in a variety of management, finance, engineering and manufacturing positions.

PhillipNigel J. Francis, age 54, has been Vice President - Corporate Planning since joining our Company in November 2014. Prior to joining AAM, Mr. Francis has nearly 30 years of experience in the global automotive sector having held executive level positions at OEM and Tier I companies in North America and Europe including, Senior Vice President Automotive Office State of Michigan and Senior Adviser to the Governor of Michigan, Chief Engineering and Program Management - Tata Technologies, Chief Operating Officer and Chief Technology Officer - Trexa LLC, Executive Vice President - Bright Automotive; and Vice President of Vehicle Engineering - Mercedes-Benz Technology. Mr. Francis has spent the majority of his career in advanced design and engineering product development and in recent years has been closely involved with clean technology through hybrid and electric vehicle development and strategic planning in the global automotive sector.

Philip R. Guys, age 4952, has been Vice President - Product Engineering & Development since November 2012. Prior to that, he served as Vice President - Product Engineering since joining AAM in December 2011. Prior to joining our Company, Mr. Guys served for four years at Linamar Corporation in various senior management positions, including Vice President - Engineering, and over 20 years in various engineering positions of increasing responsibility at Ford Motor Company and General Motors.

John E. Jerge, age 50Donald L. Joseph, age 59, has been President - AAM Americas,Asia, Vice President - AAM Corporate since January 2015. Mr. Joseph joined AAM in 1994 as a Manufacturing Manager at AAM's Three Rivers Manufacturing Facility. Since then, he has served in various manufacturing and management positions with increasing responsibility throughout AAM's global operations, including his most recent position of Managing Director - AAM Asia. Mr. Joseph's professional career began with General Motors in 1977. While at General Motors, Mr. Joseph served in a variety of positions with increasing responsibility at the Hydra-matic and Saginaw Divisions. He also spent time at the NUMMI facility studying lean manufacturing.

Terri M. Kemp, age 49, has been Vice President - Human Resources since September 2012. Prior to that, she served as Executive Director - Human Resources & Labor Relations (since November 2010.2010); Executive Director - Human Resources (since September 2009); Director - Human Resources Operations (since October 2008); Director - Program Management (since March 2008); Director - Program Management, Mexico (since August 2006); Launch Manager (since May 2006); Manager - Manufacturing (since August 2005); Manager - Manufacturing, Front Axles and Gears (since June 2005); Area Manager - Plant 1 (since October 2004); Director - Personnel, Detroit Gear & Axle (since January 2003); Area Manager - Plant 6 (since March 2002); Manager - Program Management (since February 2001); Area Manager - Manufacturing Plant 8 (since June 1999); Supervisor - I.E. Plants 1, 6 and 8 (since August 1998); Production Coordinator (since September 1997); and Manager - Productivity since joining the Company in July 1996. Prior to joining our Company, Mrs. Kemp served for nine years at Corning Incorporated, where she progressed through a series of manufacturing positions with increasing responsibility, including Industrial Engineer, Department Head and Operations Manager.

9





Michael J. Lynch, age 51, has been Vice President - Finance & Controller since September 2012. Prior to that, he served as Vice President - Materials, Logistics, QualityExecutive Director & Labor Relations (since September 2009), Vice President - Driveshaft & Halfshaft Business UnitController (since October 2008); Vice PresidentDirector - Human ResourcesCommercial Analysis (since July 2006); Director - Finance, Driveline Americas (since March 2006); Director - Investment & Commercial Analysis (since November 2005); Director - Finance, Driveline (since October 2005); Director - Finance Operations, U.S. (since April 2005); Manager - Finance (since June 2003); Manager - Finance, Forge Division (since September 2004)2001); Executive Director, Labor RelationsFinance Manager - Albion Automotive (since April 2004)October 1998); Director, Labor RelationsSupervisor - Cost Estimating (since January 2003); Plant Manager,February 1998) and Financial Analyst at the Detroit Gear & Axle Plant (since March 2000); Plant Manager, Buffalo Gear Axle & Linkage (since November 1997); Manufacturing Manager, Buffalo Gear Axle & Linkage (since March 1996); Area manager of Axles and Area Manager of Linkage (sinceFacility since joining our CompanyAAM in March 1994).September 1996. Prior to joining our Company, Mr. JergeLynch served at Chrysler CorporationStellar Engineering for 10nine years in a variety of manufacturing, engineering and plant management positions.various capacities.

Allan R. Monich, age 5861, has been Vice President - Quality, Warranty & Customer Satisfaction since November 2010. Prior to that, he served as Executive Director - Warranty (since January 2010); Vice President - Quality Assurance & Customer Satisfaction (since July 2006); Vice President - Program Management & Capital Planning (since October 2005); Vice President - Program Management & Launch (since May 2004); Vice President, Manufacturing Forging Division (since October 2001); Vice President, Human Resources (since 1998); Vice President, Personnel (since November 1997) and Plant Manager for the Buffalo Gear & Axle Plant in Buffalo, NY since the formation of our Company in March 1994.  Prior to joining our Company in March 1994, Mr. Monich worked for General Motors for 22 years in the areas of manufacturing, quality assurance, sales and engineering, including four years as a Plant Manager.

Inacio N. Moriguchi,Jon R. Morrison, age 5256 , has been President - AAM North America, Vice President - Operations - AAM - AmericasCorporate since November 2010. Prior to that, he served as Executive Director - AAM Manufacturing Systems (since October 2009); General Manager - Detroit Manufacturing Complex (since July 2008); President & Chief Operating Officer - Colfor Manufacturing (since July 2006); Executive Director - Manufacturing Services Metal Form Divisions (Since May 2004); Director - Manufacturing Services Forging Division (Since October 2001) and Director - Manufacturing Engineering (since October 2000). Prior to joining our Company in October 2000,November 2014. Prior to joining AAM, Mr. Moriguchi worked for 22 yearsMorrison has held executive level positions in the areasautomotive industry including Vice President Vehicle Dynamics and Controls - WABCO Holdings Inc., President and General Manager - Meritor WABCO Vehicle Control Systems; General Manager, Plant Manager, Global Director of manufacturing management, forging plant start-ups, manufacturing engineeringSales and program launches.Engineering - Dana Corp., President - PBR Knoxville LLC (a joint venture between PBR International and Delphi Corp) and Vice President of Sales and Product Planning North America - PBR International. Morrison’s 30-year automotive and heavy vehicle career includes responsibilities in Finance, Manufacturing, Sales and Marketing, Engineering as well as managing global customer relationships.

Steven J. Proctor,John S. Sofia, age 55, has been President - AAM Asia, Vice President - AAM CorporateGlobal Program Management since October 2008.November 2012. Prior to that, he served as Vice President - Sales & Marketing (since June 2004); Executive Director, Driveline Sales & Marketing (since September 2003); President and Chief Operating Officer of AAM do Brasil (since September 1999); Director, GMT-360, I-10/GMT-355 (since December 1998); Director, Worldwide Programs (since February 1998); Director, Strategic Planning (since July 1996) and Director, General Motors Programs (since joining our Company in March 1994). Prior to joining our Company, Mr. Proctor worked for General Motors for 20 years in the areas of product and industrial engineering, production, material management and sales.

8



Kevin M. Smith, age 50, has been Vice President - Driveshaft Business Unit since December 2011. Prior to that, he served as Vice President - Program Management & Launch (since November 2010), Executive Director - Advanced Programs, Cost Reductions & Productivity (since January 2010); Vice President - Mexico Operations (since December 2007); Plant Manager, Guanajuato Gear & Axle (since February 2007); Executive Director, Manufacturing Engineering (since July 2006); Executive Director, Axle Engineering (since January 2006); Director, GMT 900 Program (since October 2001); Director, Manufacturing Engineering (since June 2001); Plant Manager, Buffalo Gear, Axle & Linkage (since March 2000); Plant Manager, Three Rivers (since February 1998); Manufacturing Manager, Detroit Gear & Axle Plant (since February 1996) and Manufacturing Engineering Manager, Buffalo Gear, Axle & Linkage (since joining our Company in March 1994).  Prior to joining our Company, Mr. Smith served at Chrysler Corporation for 10 years in a variety of manufacturing and engineering positions.

John S. Sofia, age 51, has been Vice President - Commercial Vehicle Business since(since March 2008. Prior to that, he served as2008); Vice President - Product Engineering, Commercial Vehicle Operations & Chief Technology Officer (since December 2007); Vice President - Engineering & Product Development (since July 2006); Vice President - Quality Assurance & Customer Satisfaction (since October 2004); Director, Advanced Quality Planning (since August 2002); Plant Manager, Detroit Forge (since April 2001); Director, Product Engineering (since June 2000); Manager of the Current Production & Process Engineering Group (since September 1997) and Engineering Manager (since joining our Company in May 1994). Prior to joining our Company, Mr. Sofia served at Chrysler Corporation for 10 years in a variety of manufacturing and engineering positions.

Thomas J. Szymanski, age 50,53, has been Vice President - Driveline Manufacturing Services since November 2014. Prior to that, he served as President - AAM North America, Vice President - AAM Corporate (since January 2014), Vice President - Operations - AAM Americas (since November 2012), Vice President - Global Manufacturing Services since(since November 2010. Prior to that, he served as2010); Executive Director - Manufacturing Planning (since October 2008); Executive Director - Corporate Manufacturing Services Unibody Vehicles (since January 2008); Director - Cost Estimating & Advanced Manufacturing Engineering (since August 2006); President & Chief Operating Officer - Colfor Manufacturing, Inc. (since August 2004); Director - Corporate Manufacturing Engineering (since January 2003); Plant Manager - Three Rivers Gear & Axle (since March 2000); Plant Manager - Tonawanda Forge (since December 1998); Manufacturing Manager - Tonawanda Forge (since March 1994); and Area Manager, Axle Assembly - Buffalo Gear & Axle (since the formation of our Company in March 1994). Prior to joining our Company in March 1994, Mr. Szymanski worked for General Motors for 11 years in a variety of manufacturing and plant management positions.

Norman Willemse, age 5558, has been Vice President - Metal Formed Product Business Unit since December 2011. Prior to that, he served as Vice President - Global Metal Formed Product Business Unit (since October 2008), Vice President - Global Metal Formed Product Operations (since December 2007); General Manager - Metal Formed Products Division (since July 2006) and Managing Director - Albion Automotive (since joining our Company in August 2001). Prior to joining our Company, Mr. Willemse served at ATSAS for seven years as Executive Director Engineering & Commercial and John Deere for over 17 years in various engineering positions of increasing responsibility. Mr. Willemse is a professional certified mechanical engineer.

10





Internet Website Access to Reports

The website for American Axle & Manufacturing Holdings, Inc. is www.aam.com. Our annual reportsAnnual Reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K and amendments to those reports filed or furnished pursuant to section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 are available free of charge through our website as soon as reasonably practicable after they are electronically filed with, or furnished to, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). The SEC also maintains a website at www.sec.gov that contains reports, proxy and information statements, and other information regarding issuers that file electronically with the SEC. The information contained in the Company's website is not included, or incorporated by reference, in this annual reportAnnual Report on Form 10-K.

9



(d)Financial Information About Geographic Areas

International operations are subject to certain additional risks inherent in conducting business outside the U.S., such as changes in currency exchange rates, price and currency exchange controls, import restrictions, nationalization, expropriation and other governmental action. Financial information relating to our operations by geographic area is presented in the following table. Net sales are attributed to countries based upon location of customer. Long-lived assets exclude deferred income taxes.

December 31,December 31,
2011 2010 20092014 2013 2012
(in millions)(in millions)
Net sales          
United States$1,587.3
 $1,396.7
 $979.7
$2,073.6
 $1,682.0
 $1,576.6
Canada60.8
 50.1
 66.5
64.6
 74.4
 75.0
Mexico678.5
 638.0
 371.6
1,055.5
 865.6
 755.1
South America134.8
 99.5
 34.9
156.5
 201.1
 216.4
Other123.6
 98.7
 68.9
Asia238.6
 255.2
 214.5
Europe and other107.2
 129.0
 93.3
Total net sales$2,585.0
 $2,283.0
 $1,521.6
$3,696.0
 $3,207.3
 $2,930.9
          
Long-lived assets          
United States$845.7
 $816.2
 $818.0
$885.9
 $850.0
 $865.3
Mexico384.9
 381.8
 410.3
513.2
 469.3
 417.7
South America131.9
 124.4
 112.0
80.5
 100.2
 113.3
Other183.0
 151.6
 102.2
Asia177.3
 176.7
 159.0
Europe94.0
 93.2
 72.5
Total long-lived assets$1,545.5
 $1,474.0
 $1,442.5
$1,750.9
 $1,689.4
 $1,627.8

1011




Item 1A.Risk Factors

The following risk factors and other information included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K should be considered. If any of the following risks occur, our business, financial condition, operating results and cash flows could be materially adversely affected.

General global economic conditions may have an adverse impact on our operating performance and results of operations.
The automotive industry has continued to improve over the past two years after suffering the effects of the global financial crisis we experienced in 2008 and 2009. While the U.S. SAAR increased to 12.7 million units in 2011 from 11.6 million in 2010, the automotive industry is still recovering from the effects of the unprecedented decline in consumer demand and production volumes. General economic conditions such as the depressed U.S. housing market and continued high unemployment rates may still hinder a full recovery of the domestic automotive industry over the next few years. Additionally, recent turmoil in the European credit markets and the sovereign debt crisis in the Euro-zone pose potential threats to global growth and market stability, which could have an adverse impact on the recovery of the automotive industry. Although we have reduced our operating breakeven to a SAAR equivalent of approximately 10 million vehicle units, continued weakness or deteriorating conditions in the U.S. or global economy that results in another reduction or continued depressed levels of automotive production and sales by our largest customers may adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations. Additionally, in a down-cycle economic environment, we may experience the negative effects of increased competitive pricing pressure and customer turnover.

Our business is significantly dependent on sales to GM and Chrysler.

We are the principal supplier of driveline components to GM for its full-size RWD light trucks and SUVs manufactured in North America, supplying substantially all of GM's RWDrear axle and 4WD/AWD axle requirements for these vehicle platforms. Sales to GM were approximately 73%68% of our totalconsolidated net sales in 20112014, 75%71% in 2013, and 73% in 2010 and 78% in 20092012. A reduction in our sales to GM or a reduction by GM of its production of RWD light trucks or SUVs, as a result of market share losses of GM or otherwise, could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and financial condition.

We are also the principal supplier ofsupply driveline system products for Chrysler's Dodgeheavy-duty Ram programfull-size pickup trucks and its derivatives.derivatives, as well as the AWD Jeep Cherokee and the AWD Chrysler 200. Sales to Chrysler accounted for approximately 8%18% of our totalconsolidated net sales in 20112014, 9%12% in 20102013 and 8%10% in 20092012. A reduction in our sales to Chrysler or a reduction by Chrysler of its production of the Dodge Ram program, as a result of market share losses of Chrysler or otherwise, could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and financial condition.

Our business may also be adversely affected by reduced demand for the product programs we currently support, or if we do not obtain sales orders for successor programs that replace our current product programs.

Our business is dependent on the rear-wheel drive light truck and SUV market segments in North America.
 
A substantial portion of our revenue is derived from products supporting RWD light truck and SUV platforms in North America. Sales and production levels of light trucks and SUVs are being affected by many factors, including changes in consumer demand; product mix shifts favoring other types of light vehicles, such as front-wheel drive based crossover vehicles and passenger cars; fuel prices; and government regulation, such as the corporate average fuel economy (CAFE) regulations and related emissions standards promulgated by federal and state regulators. In 2010, U.S. Congress enacted2012, the Obama Administration announced new CAFE regulations that would increasestandards for cars and light-duty trucks, raising the U.S. fuel-economy standard industry average to 35the equivalent of 54.5 miles per gallon by year 2016, while light trucks will be required to meet nearly 28 miles per gallon by 2016.2025. Our customers are currently reacting toplanning for these regulations includingand the potential impact on consumer preferences and demand for vehicles. A reduction in the market segment we currently supply could have a material adverse impact on our results of operations and financial condition.

Our company may not realize all of the revenue expected from our new business backlog.

The realization of incremental revenues from awarded business is inherently subject to a number of risks and uncertainties, including the accuracy of customer estimates relating to the number of vehicles to be produced in new and existing product programs and the timing of such production. It is also possible that our customers may choose to delay or cancel a product program that has been awarded to us. Our revenues, operating results and financial position could be adversely affected relative to our current financial plans if we do not realize substantially

11


all the revenue from our new business backlog.

Our company or our customers may not be able to successfully launch new product programs on a timely basis.

Certain of our customers are preparing to launch new product programs for which we will supply newly developed driveline system products and related components. Some of these new product program launches have required, and will continue to require, substantial capital investment. We may not be able to install and certify the equipment needed to produce products for these new product programs in time for the start of production. There can be no assurance that we will successfully complete the transition of our manufacturing facilities and resources to support these new product programs or any other future product programs. Accordingly, the launch of new product programs may adversely affect production rates or other operational efficiency and profitability measures at our facilities. In addition, our customers may delay the launch or fail to successfully execute the launch of these product programs, or any additional future product program for which we will supply products.

We are under continuing pressure from our customers to reduce our prices.

Annual price reductions are a common practice in the automotive industry. The majority of our products are sold under long-term contracts with prices scheduled at the time the contracts are established. Many of our contracts require us to reduce our prices in subsequent years and most of our contracts allow us to adjust prices for engineering changes. If we must accommodate a customer's demand for higher annual price reductions and are unable to offset the impact of any such price reductions through continued technology improvements, cost reductions andor other productivity initiatives, our results of operations and financial condition could be adversely affected.


Our business could be adversely affected by volatility in the price of raw materials.12

Worldwide commodity market conditions have resulted in volatility in the cost of steel and other metallic materials in recent years. As general economic conditions and customer demand increase, the cost of such steel and metallic materials needed for our products has increased. If we are unable to pass cost increases on to our customers, this could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and financial condition.

Our business could be adversely affected if we fail to maintain satisfactory labor relations.
The majority of our hourly associates worldwide are members of industrial trade unions employed under the terms of collective bargaining agreements. Substantially all of our hourly associates in the U.S. are represented by the UAW. Approximately 335 of our UAW represented associates are covered by labor agreements that expire on February 25, 2012. Approximately 3,000 of our hourly associates at our facilities in Mexico and Brazil are also covered by collective bargaining agreements which expire annually. There can be no assurance that future negotiations with our labor unions will be resolved favorably or that we will not experience a work stoppage or disruption that could have a material adverse impact on our results of operations and financial condition. In addition, there can be no assurance that such future negotiations will not result in labor cost increases or other terms and conditions that could adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition or our ability to compete for future business.

Our business could be adversely affected by disruptions in our supply chain and our customers' supply chain.

We depend on a limited number of suppliers for certain key components and materials needed for our products. We rely upon, and expect to continue to rely upon, certain suppliers for critical components and materials that are not readily available in sufficient volume from other sources. As we expand our global manufacturing footprint, we will need to rely on suppliers in local markets that have not yet proven their ability to meet our requirements. These supply chain characteristics make us susceptible to supply shortages and price increases. In addition, in recent years, several of our direct material suppliers have filed for bankruptcy protection and restructured their operations to significantly reduce their installed capacity. If production volumes increase rapidly, there can be no assurance that the suppliers of critical components and materials will be able or willing to meet our future needs on a timely basis. A significant disruption in the supply of these materials could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and financial condition.


12


Natural disasters, such as the recent earthquake in Japan and the floods in Thailand, have affected the automotive industry's supply chain over the past year. Although our direct supply chain did not suffer any material effects from these natural disasters, future natural disasters could cause a disruption in the supply of critical components to us and our customers and have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and financial condition.

We may incur material losses and costs as a result of product recall, product liability and warranty claims, litigation and other disputes and claims.

We are exposed to warranty, product recall and product liability claims in the event that our products fail to perform as expected, and we may be required to participate in a recall of such products. Prior to 2011, we have experienced negligible warranty charges from our customers due to our contractual arrangements and the quality, warranty, reliability and durability performance of our products. As part of our 2009 Settlement and Commercial Agreement with GM, we agreed to expanded warranty cost sharing, which began on January 1, 2011. In addition, as we continue to diversify our customer base, we will also be obligated to share in the cost of providing warranties as part of our agreements with new customers. Costs and expenses associated with warranties, product recalls and product liability claims could have a material adverse impact on our results of operations and financial condition and may differ materially from the estimated liabilities that we have recorded in our consolidated financial statements.

We are also involved in various legal proceedings incidental to our business. Although we believe that none of these matters is likely to have a material adverse effect on our results of operations or financial condition, there can be no assurance as to the ultimate outcome of any such legal proceeding or any future legal proceedings.

Our company's global operations are subject to risks and uncertainties.
We have business and technical offices and manufacturing facilities in many foreign countries, including Brazil, China, India, Mexico, Poland, Sweden, Thailand and the U.K. Approximately 6,200 of our 9,200 associates are located outside of the U.S. International operations are subject to certain risks inherent in conducting business outside the U.S., such as changes in currency exchange rates, tax laws, price and currency exchange controls, import restrictions, nationalization, expropriation and other governmental action. Our global operations may also be adversely affected by political events and domestic or international terrorist events and hostilities. These uncertainties could have a material adverse effect on the continuity of our business and our results of operations and financial condition. As we continue to expand our business globally, our success will depend, in part, on our ability to anticipate and effectively manage these and other risks.

Our financial condition and operations may be adversely affected by a violation of financial and other covenants.

Our Revolving Credit Facility, as amended, contains financial covenants related to secured indebtedness leverage and interest coverage.  The Revolving Credit Facility and our 9.25% Senior Secured Notes due 2017 (9.25% Notes) impose limitations on our ability to make certain investments, loans and guarantees, declare dividends or distributions on capital stock, redeem or repurchase capital stock and certain debt obligations, incur liens, incur indebtedness, enter into certain restrictive agreements, merge, make acquisitions or sell all or substantially all of our assets.  The Revolving Credit Facility and the 9.25% Notes also significantly restrict our ability to incur additional secured debt.  The Revolving Credit Facility, 9.25% Notes and the indentures governing our senior unsecured notes also include customary events of default.  Obligations under the Revolving Credit Facility, the 9.25% Notes and our 7.75% senior unsecured notes are required to be guaranteed by most of our U.S. subsidiaries that hold domestic assets.  In addition, the Revolving Credit Facility and the 9.25% Notes are secured on a first priority basis by all or substantially all of our assets, the assets of Holdings and each guarantor's assets, including a pledge of capital stock of our U.S. subsidiaries that hold domestic assets and a portion of the capital stock of the first tier foreign subsidiaries of AAM and each guarantor.  A violation of any of these covenants or agreements could result in a default under these contracts, which could permit the lenders or note holders to accelerate repayment of any borrowings or notes outstanding at that time and levy on the collateral granted in connection with these contracts.  A default or acceleration under the Revolving Credit Facility, 9.25% Notes or the indentures governing our senior unsecured notes may result in increased capital costs and defaults under our other debt agreements and may adversely affect our ability to operate our business, our subsidiaries and guarantors' ability to operate their respective businesses and our results of operations and financial condition.


13




Our business faces substantial competition.
 
The automotive industry is highly competitive. Our competitors include the driveline component manufacturing facilities controlled by certain existing OEMs, as well as many other domestic and foreign companies possessing the capability to produce some or all of the products we supply. Some of our competitors are affiliated with OEMs and others have economic advantages as compared to our business, such as patents, existing underutilized capacity and lower wage and benefit costs. Technology, design, quality, delivery and cost are the primary elements of competition in our industry segment. As a result of these competitive pressures and other industry trends, OEMs and suppliers are developing strategies to reduce costs. These strategies include supply base consolidation and global sourcing. Our business may be adversely affected by increased competition from suppliers benefiting from OEM affiliate relationships bankruptcy reorganization or financial and other resources that we do not possess. Our business may also be adversely affected if we do not sustain our ability to meet customer requirements relative to technology, design, quality, delivery and cost.

Our business could be adversely affected by disruptions in our supply chain and our customers' supply chain.

We depend on a limited number of suppliers for certain key components and materials needed for our products. We rely upon, and expect to continue to rely upon, certain suppliers for critical components and materials that are not readily available in sufficient volume from other sources. As we continue to expand our global manufacturing footprint, we need to rely on suppliers in local markets that have not yet proven their ability to meet our requirements. These supply chain characteristics make us susceptible to supply shortages and price increases. In addition, over the past several years, many of our direct material suppliers have filed for bankruptcy protection and restructured their operations to significantly reduce their installed capacity. If production volumes increase rapidly, there can be no assurance that the suppliers of critical components and materials will be able or willing to meet our future needs on a timely basis. A significant disruption in the supply of these materials could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and financial condition.

Natural disasters, such as the earthquake in Japan and floods in Thailand, affected the automotive industry's supply chain in 2011. Although our direct supply chain did not suffer material adverse effects from these natural disasters, future natural disasters could cause a disruption in the supply of critical components to us and our customers and have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and financial condition.

A failure of our information technology (IT) networks and systems, or the inability to successfully implement upgrades to our enterprise resource planning systems, could adversely impact our business and operations.

We rely upon information technology networks and systems to process, transmit and store electronic information, and to manage or support a variety of business processes or activities. Additionally, we and certain of our third-party vendors collect and store personal information in connection with human resources operations and other aspects of our business. The secure operation of these information technology networks and systems and the proper processing and maintenance of this information are critical to our business operations. Despite the implementation of security measures, our IT systems are at risk to damages from computer viruses, unauthorized access, cyber attack and other similar disruptions. The occurrence of any of these events could compromise our networks, and the information stored there could be accessed, publicly disclosed or lost. Any such access, disclosure or other loss of information could result in legal claims or proceedings, liability or regulatory penalties under laws protecting the privacy of personal information, the disruption of our operations or damage to our reputation. We may be required to incur significant costs to protect against damage caused by these disruptions or security breaches in the future.
Further, we are continually expanding and updating our networks and systems in response to the changing needs of our business. We are currently in the process of developing and testing global enterprise resource planning (ERP) systems to upgrade many of our existing operating and financial systems. We began implementing these ERP systems in the first quarter of 2015. Such an implementation is a major undertaking, both financially and from a management and personnel perspective. Should the systems not be implemented successfully, or if the systems do not perform in a satisfactory manner once implementation is complete, our business and operations could be disrupted and our results of operations could be adversely affected, including our ability to report accurate and timely financial results.

13





General global economic conditions may have an adverse impact on our operating performance and results of operations.
The automotive industry has continued to improve over the past five years after suffering the effects of the global financial crisis experienced in 2008 and 2009. The U.S. Seasonally Adjusted Annual Rate of sales (SAAR) has returned to a more normalized rate of 16.4 million units in 2014 from 15.5 million in 2013 and 14.4 million in 2012, as the automotive industry has recovered from the effects of the unprecedented decline in consumer demand and production volumes. Deteriorating conditions in the U.S. or global economy that result in another reduction or depressed levels of automotive production and sales by our largest customers may adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations. Additionally, in a flat or declining economic environment, we may experience the negative effects of increased competitive pricing pressure and customer turnover.

Our company's global operations are subject to risks and uncertainties.
We have business and technical offices and manufacturing facilities in many foreign countries, including Brazil, China, India, Mexico, Poland, Scotland, Sweden and Thailand. Approximately 9,010 of our 12,820 associates are located outside of the U.S. International operations are subject to certain risks inherent in conducting business outside the U.S., such as changes in currency exchange rates, tax laws, price and currency exchange controls, import restrictions, nationalization, expropriation and other governmental action. Our global operations may also be adversely affected by political events and domestic or international terrorist events and hostilities. These uncertainties could have a material adverse effect on the continuity of our business and our results of operations and financial condition. As we continue to expand our business globally, our success will depend, in part, on our ability to anticipate and effectively manage these and other risks.

We may incur material losses and costs as a result of product recall or field action, product liability and warranty claims, litigation and other disputes and claims.

We are exposed to warranty, product recall or field action and product liability claims in the event that our products fail to perform as expected, and we may be required to participate in a recall of such products. Historically, we have experienced negligible warranty charges from our customers due to the quality, reliability and durability performance of our products. We are not responsible for certain warranty claims that may be incurred by our customers. This includes returned components for which no trouble was found upon inspection, discretionary acts of dealer goodwill, defects related to certain directed buy components, or build to print design issues. We review warranty claim activity in detail, and we may have disagreements with our customers as to responsibility for these types of costs incurred by our customer. In addition, as we continue to diversify our customer base, we have an increased obligation to share in the cost of providing warranties as part of our agreements with new customers. Costs and expenses associated with warranties, field actions, product recalls and product liability claims could have a material adverse impact on our results of operations and financial condition and may differ materially from the estimated liabilities that we have recorded in our consolidated financial statements.

In addition to warranty claims relating directly to products we produce, potential product recalls for our customers and their other suppliers, and the potential reputational harm that may result from such product recalls, could have a material adverse impact on our results of operations and financial condition.

We are also involved in various legal proceedings incidental to our business. Although we believe that none of these matters are likely to have a material adverse effect on our results of operations or financial condition, there can be no assurance as to the ultimate outcome of any such legal proceeding or any future legal proceedings.

14





Our business could be adversely affected if we fail to maintain satisfactory labor relations or if our customers fail to maintain satisfactory labor relations.
The majority of our hourly associates worldwide are members of industrial trade unions employed under the terms of collective bargaining agreements. Substantially all of our hourly associates in the U.S. are represented by the UAW. Approximately 4,045 of our hourly associates at our facilities in Mexico and Brazil are also covered by collective bargaining agreements which expire annually. There can be no assurance that future negotiations with our labor unions will be resolved favorably or that we will not experience a work stoppage or disruption that could have a material adverse impact on our results of operations and financial condition. In addition, there can be no assurance that such future negotiations will not result in labor cost increases or other terms and conditions that could adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition or our ability to compete for future business.

Further, the inability of our largest customers to maintain satisfactory labor relations with the UAW could also impact our operations. If our largest customers fail to successfully negotiate labor contracts on or before their expiration in 2015, potential work stoppages and disruptions in production schedules could result, which may have a material adverse impact to our results of operations and financial condition.

Our company or our customers may not be able to successfully and efficiently manage the timing and costs of new product program launches.

Certain of our customers are preparing to launch, or have recently launched, new product programs for which we will supply newly developed driveline system products and related components.  There can be no assurance that we will successfully complete the transition of our manufacturing facilities and resources to support these new product programs or other future product programs on a timely and cost efficient basis.  Accordingly, the launch of new product programs may adversely affect production rates or other operational efficiency and profitability measures at our facilities.  We may also experience difficulties with the performance of our supply chain on program launches, which could result in our inability to meet our contractual obligations to key customers. Production shortfalls or production delays, if any, could result in our failure to effectively manage our material and freight costs relating to these program launches. In addition, our customers may delay the launch or fail to successfully execute the launch of these new product programs, or any additional future product program for which we will supply products. Our revenues, operating results and financial condition could be adversely impacted if our customers fail to timely launch such programs or if we are unable to manage the timing requirements and costs of new product program launches.

Our company may not realize all of the revenue expected from our new and incremental business backlog.

The realization of incremental revenues from awarded business is inherently subject to a number of risks and uncertainties, including the accuracy of customer estimates relating to the number of vehicles to be produced in new and existing product programs and the timing of such production. It is also possible that our customers may delay or cancel a product program that has been awarded to us. Our revenues, operating results and financial condition could be adversely affected relative to our current financial plans if we do not realize substantially all the revenue from our new and incremental business backlog.

Negative or unexpected tax consequences could adversely affect our results of operations.
We file income tax returns in the U.S. federal jurisdiction, as well as various states and foreign jurisdictions. We are also subject to examinations of these income tax returns by the relevant tax authorities. As of December 31, 2014 and 2013, we have recorded a liability for unrecognized income tax benefits and related interest and penalties of $59.5 million and $25.8 million, respectively. Based on the status of these audits and the protocol of finalizing audits by the relevant tax authorities, it is not possible to estimate the impact of changes, if any, to previously recorded uncertain tax positions. Any negative or unexpected outcomes of these examinations and audits could have a material adverse impact on our results of operations and financial condition.

15




Our business could be adversely affected by volatility in the price of raw materials.

Worldwide commodity market conditions have resulted in volatility in the cost of steel and other metallic materials in recent years. As general economic conditions have improved and customer demand has increased, the cost of steel and metallic materials needed for our products has increased. If we are unable to pass cost increases on to our customers, this could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and financial condition.

We may be unable to consummate and successfully integrate acquisitions and joint ventures.

As we continue to expand globally and accelerate our diversification efforts, we have, and may continue to, engagepursue strategic growth initiatives with greater frequency going forward. Engaging in acquisitions and joint ventures that involveinvolves potential risks, including failure to successfully integrate and realize the expected benefits of such acquisitions and joint ventures. Integrating acquired operations is a significant challenge and there is no assurance that we will be able to manage the integrations successfully. Failure to successfully integrate acquired operations or to realize the expected benefits of such acquisitions may have an adverse impact on our results of operations and financial condition.

Our company's ability to operate effectively could be impaired if we lose key personnel.

Our success depends, in part, on the efforts of our executive officers and other key associates, such as engineers and global operational leadership. In addition, our future success will depend on, among other factors, our ability to continue to attract and retain qualified personnel, particularly engineers and other employees with critical expertise and skills that support key customers and products. The loss of the services of our executive officers or other key associates, unexpected turnover, or the failure to attract or retain associates, could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and financial condition.

We use important intellectual property in our business. If we are unable to protect our intellectual property or if a third party makes assertions against us or our customers relating to intellectual property rights, our business could be adversely affected by the cyclical natureaffected.

We own important intellectual property, including patents, trademarks, copyrights and trade secrets, and are involved in numerous licensing arrangements. Our intellectual property plays an important role in maintaining our competitive position in a number of the automotive industry.markets that we serve. Our competitors may develop technologies that are similar to our proprietary technologies or design around the patents we own or license. Further, as we expand our operations in jurisdictions where the protection of intellectual property rights is less robust, the risk of others duplicating our proprietary technologies increases, despite efforts we undertake to protect them. Developments or assertions by or against us relating to intellectual property rights, and any inability to protect these rights, could materially adversely affect our business and our competitive position.

16





Our financial condition and operations are cyclical because they are directly related to worldwide automotive production, which is itself cyclical and dependent on general economic conditions and other factors, such as credit availability, interest rates, fuel prices and consumer confidence. Our business may be further adversely affected by another economic decline that results in a further reduction of automotive production and sales by our largest customers. Our business may also be adversely affected by reduced demand fora violation of financial and other covenants.

Our revolving credit facility contains financial covenants related to secured and unsecured indebtedness leverage and interest coverage.  The revolving credit facility limits our ability to make certain investments, loans and guarantees, declare dividends or distributions on capital stock, redeem or repurchase capital stock and certain debt obligations, incur liens, incur indebtedness, enter into certain restrictive agreements, merge, make acquisitions or sell all or substantially all of our assets.  The indenture governing our senior unsecured notes also restricts our ability to incur debt secured by liens, engage in consolidations or mergers or sell all or substantially all of our assets, and engage in certain sale and leaseback transactions. The revolving credit facility also significantly restricts our ability to incur additional secured debt.  The revolving credit facility and the product programs we currently support,indentures governing our senior unsecured notes also include customary events of default.  Obligations under the revolving credit facility, the 7.75% senior unsecured notes due 2019 (7.75% Notes), the 6.625% senior unsecured notes due 2022 (6.625% Notes), the 6.25% senior unsecured notes due 2021 (6.25% Notes) and our 5.125% senior unsecured notes due 2019 (5.125% Notes) are required to be guaranteed by most of our U.S. subsidiaries that hold domestic assets.  In addition, the revolving credit facility is secured on a first priority basis by all or if we do not obtain sales orders for newsubstantially all of the assets of AAM, Inc., the assets of Holdings and each guarantor's assets, including a pledge of capital stock of our U.S. subsidiaries that hold domestic assets, including each guarantor, and a portion of the capital stock of the first tier foreign subsidiaries of AAM.  A violation of any of these covenants or redesigned productsagreements could result in a default under these contracts, which could permit the lenders or note holders to accelerate repayment of any borrowings or notes outstanding at that replacetime and levy on the collateral granted in connection with these contracts.  A default or acceleration under the revolving credit facility or the indentures governing the senior unsecured notes may result in increased capital costs and defaults under our current product programs.other debt agreements and may adversely affect our ability to operate our business, our subsidiaries' and guarantors' ability to operate their respective businesses and our results of operations and financial condition.

Our company faces substantial pension and other postretirement benefit obligations.
 
We have significant pension and other postretirement benefit obligations to certain of our associates and retirees. Our ability to satisfy the funding requirements associated with these obligations will depend on our cash flow from operations and our ability to access credit and the capital markets. The funding requirements of these benefit plans, and the related expense reflected in our financial statements, are affected by several factors that are subject to an inherent degree of uncertainty and volatility, including governmental regulation. Key assumptions used to value these benefit obligations and the cost of providing such benefits, funding requirements and expense recognition include the discount rate, the expected long-term rate of return on pension assets, mortality rates and the health care cost trend rate. If the actual trends in these factors are less favorable than our assumptions, this could have an adverse effect on our results of operations and financial condition.

Our business is subject to costs associated with environmental, health and safety regulations.

Our operations are subject to various federal, state, local and foreign laws and regulations governing, among other things, emissions to air, discharge to waters and the generation, handling, storage, transportation, treatment and disposal of waste and other materials. We believe that our operations and facilities have been and are being operated in compliance, in all material respects, with such laws and regulations, many of which provide for substantial fines and criminal sanctions for violations. The operation of our manufacturing facilities entails risks in these areas, however, and there can be no assurance that we will not incur material costs or liabilities. In addition, potentially significant expenditures could be required in order to comply with evolving environmental, health and safety laws, regulations or other pertinent requirements that may be adopted or imposed in the future by governmental authorities.



14



Our company's ability to operate effectively could be impaired if we lose key personnel.

Our success depends, in part, on the efforts of our executive officers and other key associates. In addition, our future success will depend on, among other factors, our ability to continue to attract and retain qualified personnel. The loss of the services of our executive officers or other key associates, or the failure to attract or retain associates, could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and financial condition.

Item 1B.Unresolved Staff Comments

None.


1517




Item 2.Properties

We operate in 13 countries and have 3437 manufacturing, engineering and business office facilities worldwide of which the principal facilities are:
Name 
Type of
Interest
 Function
Detroit Manufacturing Complex
Detroit, MI
OwnedRear and front axles and steering linkages
Three Rivers Manufacturing Facility
Three Rivers, MI
 Owned RearFront and rear axles, rear drive modules, power transfer units, driveheads and driveshafts, front auxiliary driveshafts, universal joints and driveheadssteering linkages
CheektowagaLancaster Manufacturing Facility
Cheektowaga, NY       Lancaster, Pennsylvania
 OwnedLeased ForgedAssembly of axles and machined productsdriveheads for commercial vehicles
Colfor Manufacturing, Inc.
Malvern, OH
Minerva, OH
 

Owned
Owned
 
Forged products
Forged and machined products and rear axles
MSP Industries
Oxford, MI
 Leased Forged and machined products
Oxford Forge
Oxford, MI
 Owned Forged products
DieTronik
       Auburn Hills, MI
OwnedTool & die manufacturer
AccuGear, Inc.
       Fort Wayne, IN
 Owned Forged and machined products
Lancaster Manufacturing FacilityDieTronik
       Lancaster, PennsylvaniaAuburn Hills, MI
 LeasedOwned Assembly of axles for commercial vehiclesTool & die manufacturer and machined products
Guanajuato Manufacturing Complex
Guanajuato, Mexico
 Owned Rear axles and driveshafts, front axles, front auxiliary driveshafts, forging products, rear differentialdrive modules, and power transfer units and transfer cases
Silao Manufacturing Facility
Silao, Mexico
LeasedMachined products
AccuGear - Silao
       Silao, Mexico
OwnedForged and machined products
Araucária Manufacturing Facility
Araucária, Brazil
 Owned Front and rear axles, machining of forged and cast products and constant velocity joints
Rayong Manufacturing Facility
      Rayong, Thailand
OwnedFront and rear axles and driveshafts
Albion Automotive
Glasgow, Scotland
 Leased Front and rear axles for medium and heavy-duty trucks and buses and transfer cases
Changshu Manufacturing Facility
Changshu, China
 Owned RearFront axles, independent rear drive axles, rear drive modules, gear sets and machined cases
Pantnagar Manufacturing Facility
      Pantnagar, India
 Owned Rear axles and driveshafts
Pune Manufacturing Facility
      Pune, India
 Owned DriveheadsRear axles and driveheads
RayongChennai Manufacturing Facility
      Rayong, ThailandChennai, India
 Owned FrontAssembly of front and rear axles and driveshafts
Swidnica Manufacturing Facility
       Swidnica, Poland
 Owned Transmission differentials and machined products
World Headquarters
Detroit, MI
 Owned Executive and administrative offices
Quality Engineering Technical Center
      Auburn Hills, MI
OwnedPrototypes, R&D and design engineering
Technical Center
      Rochester Hills, MI
 Owned R&D, design engineering, metallurgy, testing and validation

We believe that our property and equipment is properly maintained and in good operating condition. We will continue to evaluate capacity requirements in light of current and projected market conditions. We also intend to continue redeploying assets in order to increase our capacity utilization and reduce future capital expenditures to support program launches.


1618




Item 3.Legal Proceedings

We are involved in various legal proceedings incidental to our business. Although the outcome of these matters cannot be predicted with certainty, we do not believe that any of these matters, individually or in the aggregate, will

17


have a material effect on our financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.

We are subject to various federal, state, local and foreign environmental and occupational safety and health laws, regulations and ordinances, including those regulating air emissions, water discharge, waste management and environmental cleanup. We closely monitor our environmental conditions to ensure that we are in compliance with applicable laws, regulations and ordinances. We have made, and will continue to make, capital and other expenditures to comply with environmental requirements, including recurring administrative costs. Such expenditures were not significant in 20112014, 20102013 and 20092012.

Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures
Item 4.Mine Safety Disclosures
    
Not applicable.

Part II

Item 5. Market for Registrant's Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

Market Information
        
Our common stock, par value $0.01 per share, is listed for trading on the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) under the symbol “AXL.”
        
Stockholders and High and Low Sales Prices

2011
1st  Quarter
 
2nd  Quarter
 
3rd  Quarter
 
4th  Quarter
 Full Year
 High$16.15
 $12.80
 $11.96
 $10.04
 $16.15
 Low$12.38
 $9.79
 $6.98
 $7.01
 $6.98
2010         
 High$11.28
 $11.79
 $10.37
 $13.27
 $13.27
 Low$8.42
 $7.33
 $6.96
 $8.58
 $6.96
2014
1st  Quarter
 
2nd  Quarter
 
3rd  Quarter
 
4th  Quarter
 Full Year
 High$21.15
 $19.61
 $19.81
 $22.79
 $22.79
 Low$17.84
 $17.29
 $16.77
 $16.40
 $16.40
2013         
 High$13.72
 $18.63
 $20.94
 $20.45
 $20.94
 Low$11.03
 $11.94
 $18.65
 $17.41
 $11.03

Prices are the quarterly high and low closing sales prices for our common stock as reported by the NYSE. We had approximately 378315 stockholders of record as of February 6, 201219, 2015.

Dividends

We did not declare or pay any cash dividends on our common stock in 2011.2014. Our debt agreements limitrevolving credit agreement limits our ability to declare or pay dividends or distributions on capital stock.

Securities Authorized for Issuance under Equity Compensation Plans

There are noThe information regarding our securities authorized for issuance under equity compensation plans since the Restated 1999 American Axle & Manufacturing Holdings, Inc. Stock Incentive Compensation Plan expired on January 8, 2009.is incorporated by reference from our Proxy Statement.

1819




Item 6. Selected Financial Data

FIVE YEAR CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL SUMMARY
Year Ended December 31,

2011 2010 2009 2008 2007 2014 2013 2012 2011 2010 
(in millions, except per share data) (in millions, except per share data) 
Statement of operations data          
Statement of income data          
Net sales$2,585.0
 $2,283.0
 $1,521.6
 $2,109.2
 $3,248.2
 $3,696.0
 $3,207.3
 $2,930.9
 $2,585.0
 $2,283.0
 
Gross profit (loss)455.1
 401.7
 (31.1) (865.2) 278.4
 
Gross profit522.8
 478.7
 399.7
 458.0
(f) 
407.2
(f) 
Selling, general and                    
administrative expenses231.7
 197.6
 172.7
 185.4
 202.8
 255.2
 238.4
 243.3
 231.7
 197.6
 
Operating income (loss)223.4
 204.1
 (203.8) (1,050.6) 75.6
 
Operating income267.6
 240.3
 156.4
 226.3
(f) 
209.6
(f) 
Net interest expense(82.7) (85.2) (82.5) (67.9) (52.3) (97.8) (115.3) (101.0) (82.7) (85.2) 
Net income (loss)137.1
(a)(b) 
114.5
 (253.3)
(a)(b) 
(1,224.6)
(a) 
37.0
(a)(b) 
Net income (loss) attributable to AAM142.8
(a)(b) 
115.4
 (253.1)
(a)(b) 
(1,224.3)
(a) 
37.0
(a)(b) 
Diluted earnings (loss) per share$1.89
 $1.55
 $(4.81) $(23.73) $0.69
 
Diluted shares outstanding75.4
 74.5
 52.6
 51.6
 53.8
 
Net income143.0
(a) 
94.5
(b) 
366.7
(b)(c)(d) 
139.5
(b)(e)(f) 
119.0
(f) 
Net income attributable to AAM143.0
(a) 
94.5
(b) 
367.7
(b)(c)(d) 
145.2
(b)(e)(f) 
119.9
(f) 
Diluted earnings per share$1.85
 $1.23
 $4.87
 $1.93
(f) 
$1.61
(f) 
                    
Balance sheet data                    
Cash and cash equivalents$169.2
 $244.6
 $178.1
 $198.8
 $343.6
 $249.2
 $154.0
 $62.4
 $169.2
 $244.6
 
Total assets2,328.7
 2,114.7
 1,986.8
 2,247.7
 3,135.9
 3,259.2
 3,027.5
(f) 
2,864.5
(f) 
2,327.2
(f) 
2,113.7
(f) 
Total long-term debt1,180.2
 1,010.0
 1,071.4
 1,139.9
 858.1
 1,523.4
 1,559.1
 1,454.1
 1,180.2
 1,010.0
 
Total AAM stockholders' equity (deficit)(425.5) (479.5) (560.2) (435.7) 899.4
 113.4
 40.5
(f) 
(113.9)
(f) 
(418.6)
(f) 
(475.0)
(f) 
Dividends declared per share
 
 
 0.34
 0.60
 
 
 
 
 
 
                    
Statement of cash flows data                    
Cash provided by (used in) operating
activities
$(56.3) $240.3
 $15.9
 $(163.1) $367.9
 $318.4
 $223.0
 $(175.5) $(56.3) $240.3
 
Cash used in investing activities(184.1) (107.0) (74.6) (231.7) (186.5) (195.3) (218.7) (185.4) (184.1) (107.0) 
Cash provided by (used in) financing
activities
167.2
 (66.4) 32.1
 254.5
 148.3
 (21.4) 88.8
 253.5
 167.2
 (66.4) 
Dividends paid
 
 
 (18.3) (31.8) 
                    
Other data                    
Depreciation and amortization$139.4
 $131.6
 $134.7
 $199.5
 $229.4
 $199.9
 $177.0
 $152.2
 $139.4
 $131.6
 
Capital expenditures163.1
 108.3
 137.7
 147.3
 186.5
 206.5
 251.9
 207.6
 163.1
 108.3
 
Purchase buyouts of leased equipment13.4
 7.8
 
 
 
 
 
 
 13.4
 7.8
 
Proceeds from sale-leaseback of equipment
 24.1
 12.1
 
 
 

(a)Includes a settlement charge of $23.1 million, net of tax, related to our terminated vested lump-sum pension payout in the U.S.

(b)Includes charges of $35.1 million, net of tax, in 2013, $19.8 million in 2012, and $3.1 million in 2011 related to debt refinancing and redemption costs.

(c)Includes net special charges, curtailment gains, asset impairments and asset redeployment and other restructuring costs associated with plant closures of $40.6 million (including $28.7 million of expense related to contractual termination benefits provided to certain eligible UAW associates as a result of the DMC and CKMF plant closures).

(d)Includes the impact of the reversal of our valuation allowance on U.S. federal deferred tax assets of $337.5 million in the fourth quarter of 2012.

(e)Includes asset impairments, other non-recurring costs and tax refunds of $16.6 million in 2011 (including $0.5 million related to the non-controlling interest portion of a $1.6 million asset impairment recorded by e-AAM), $120.5 million in 2009, $985.4 million in 2008 and $58.7 million in 2007 primarily related to restructuring actions..

(b)(f)Includes chargesDue to the immaterial error discussed in Note 1, these balances have been revised. For further discussion of $3.1 million in 2011, $7.7 million in 2009the revision, see Note 1 - Organization and $3.5 million in 2007, netSummary of tax, related to debt refinancing and redemption costs.Significant Accounting Policies.

20


19


Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

COMPANY OVERVIEW

American Axle & Manufacturing Holdings, Inc. (Holdings) and its subsidiaries (collectively, we, our, us or AAM) is a Tier I supplier to the automotive industry. We manufacture, engineer, design and validate driveline and drivetrain systems and related components and chassis modules for light trucks, sport utility vehicles (SUVs), passenger cars, crossover vehicles and commercial vehicles. Driveline and drivetrain systems include components that transfer power from the transmission and deliver it to the drive wheels. Our driveline, drivetrain and related products include axles, chassis modules, driveshafts, power transfer units, transfer cases, chassis and steering components, driveheads, transmission parts, electric drive systems and metal-formed products. In addition to locations in the United States (U.S.) (Michigan, New York, Ohio, Indiana and Pennsylvania), we also have offices or facilities in Brazil, China, Germany, India, Japan, Luxembourg, Mexico, Poland, Scotland, South Korea, Sweden and Thailand.

We are the principal supplier of driveline components to General Motors Company (GM) for its full-size rear-wheel drive (RWD) light trucks and SUVs manufactured in North America, supplying substantially all of GM's rear axle and front four-wheel drive and all-wheel drive (4WD/AWD) axle requirements for these vehicle platforms. Sales to GM were approximately 73%68% of our totalconsolidated net sales in 20112014, 75%71% in 2013, and 73% in 2010 and 78% in 20092012.
 
We are the sole-source supplier to GM for certain axles and other driveline products for the life of each GM vehicle program covered by a Lifetime Program Contract (LPC)Contracts and Long Term Program Contracts (collectively, LPCs). Substantially all of our sales to GM are made pursuant to the LPCs. The LPCs have terms equal to the lives of the relevant vehicle programs or their respective derivatives, which typically run 5 to 7 years, and require us to remain competitive with respect to technology, design and quality.

We are also the principal supplier ofsupply driveline system products for theto FCA US LLC, formerly known as Chrysler Group LLC'sLLC (Chrysler), for heavy-duty Dodge Ram full-size pickup trucks (Dodge Ram program) and its derivatives.derivatives, as well as the AWD Jeep Cherokee and the AWD Chrysler 200. Sales to Chrysler were approximately 8%18% of our totalconsolidated net sales in 20112014, 9%12% in 20102013 and 8%10% in 20092012. In addition to GM and Chrysler, we supply driveline systems and other related components to Volkswagen AG (Volkswagen), Audi AG Scania AB,(Audi), Mack Trucks Inc. (Mack Truck), PACCARHarley-Davidson Inc., Nissan Motor Co., Ltd. (Nissan), PACCAR Inc., Honda Motor Co., Ltd., Harley-Davidson Inc.Jaguar Land Rover Limited (JLR), Tata Motors,Daimler Truck, Deere & Company, Ford Motor Company Deere & Company(Ford) and other original equipment manufacturers (OEMs) and Tier I supplier companies.companies such as Jatco Ltd. and Hino Motors Ltd. Our consolidated net sales to customers other than GM increased 29% to $710.0$1,199.9 million in 20112014 as compared to $563.0926.7 million in 20102013 and $331.2792.6 million in 20092012.

In 2011, we took further actions in order to improve the market cost competitiveness of our labor cost structure and rationalize our operating capacity. We notified the International UAW of our decision to close both the Detroit Manufacturing Complex (DMC) and the Cheektowaga Manufacturing Facility (CKMF) on or after February 26, 2012, the expiration of our current collective bargaining agreement with the International UAW. As a result of these recent actions, along with others made over the past several years, we have aligned our global capacity with projected market demand and improved our regional cost competitiveness on a global basis. Throughout 2011, we demonstrated our ability to operate profitably under our lower cost structure and operating breakeven level. As we look beyond 2011, we are focused on profitably growing sales, significantly diversifying our customer, product and geographic sales mix and strengthening our balance sheet.

INDUSTRY TRENDS

There are a number of significant trends affecting the highly competitive automotive industry. As general economic and industry specific conditions continue to stabilizehave stabilized and improve,improved, the global automotive industry continues to experience intense competition, volatilevolatility in fuel, steel, metallic and other commodity prices and significant pricing pressures. At the same time, the industry is intently focused on investing in future products that will incorporate the latest technology, meet changing customer demands and comply with more stringent government regulations.

In 2011,2014, the U.S. SAAR increased to 12.716.4 million units, from 11.6which compares to 15.5 million units in 2010. While the increase in production levels represents a significant year-over-year improvement, these production levels remain depressed in comparison to the 16.12013 and 14.4 million SAAR experienced in 2007. Although it is expected that U.S. automotive production will continue to increaseunits in 2012, and U.S. domestic OEM market share should remain stable, it is likely that domestic production levels will remain at relatively low levels until general economic conditions significantly improve. Factors such as the depressed U.S. housing marketeconomy and continued high unemployment rates may still hinder a full recovery of the domestic automotive industry over the next few years. Additionally, recent turmoil in the

20


European credit markets and the sovereign debt crisis in the euro-zone pose potential constraintscontinued to market stability and global growth in the automotive industry. However, asrecover. As a result of a reduction in oil prices, pent-up demand and the significant restructuring actions that were implemented overincreasing age of vehicles currently on the previous years,road, we expectbelieve that the U.S. domestic OEMs and their suppliers will continue to be able to capitalize on these increased volumestrends and provide improved financial performance as the industry gradually recovers.performance.
 
GLOBAL AUTOMOTIVE PRODUCTION The trend toward the globalization of automotive production continues to intensify in regions such as Asia (particularly China, India, South Korea and Thailand), Eastern Europe and South America. Automotive production in these regions is expected to continue to grow while production in the traditional automotive production centers such as North America, Western Europe and Japan are continuing to improve from recent declines. We have significantly increased our global installed capacity to support current and future opportunities while reducing our installed capacity in the U.S. We have expanded our facilities in Mexico, Brazil and Poland, constructed a new facility in Thailand, increased our investment in our China joint venture and are currently constructing a new facility in India. We also have offices in Germany, India, China, South Korea, Brazil and Sweden to support these developing markets. We expect our business activity in these markets to increase significantly over the next several years. Approximately 50% of our new business backlog is for end use markets outside the U.S. and approximately 70% has been sourced to our manufacturing facilities outside the U.S.

STEELMORE STRINGENT GOVERNMENT REGULATIONS FOR FUEL-EFFICIENCY AND OTHER METALLIC COMMODITIES Worldwide commodity market conditions have resulted in volatile steel and other metallic material prices. As general economic conditions have improved and production levels increased in 2011, demand for these commodities has grown and prices have risen. We have taken actions to mitigate the impact of this trend through commercial agreements with our customers, strategic sourcing arrangements with suppliers and technology advancements that result in using less metallic content or less expensive metallic content in the manufacturing of our products. The majority of our sales contracts with our largest customers provide price adjustment provisions for metal market price fluctuations. We do not have metal market price provisions with all of our customers for all of the parts that we sell. We also have agreed to share in the risk of metal market price fluctuations in certain customer contracts. As a result, we may experience higher net costs for raw materials. These cost increases would come in the form of metal market adjustments and base price increases. We currently have contracts with our steel suppliers that ensure continuity of supply to our principal operating facilities in North America.  We also have validation and testing capabilities that enable us to strategically qualify steel sources on a global basis.

INCREASE IN DEMAND FOR ALTERNATIVE ENERGY SOURCES AND ELECTRONIC INTEGRATIONEMISSIONS REDUCTIONS With a shift towards aggressive, environmentally focused legislation in the U.S., we have observedthere has been an increased demand for technologies designed to help reduce emissions, increase fuel economy and minimize the environmental impact of vehicles. In 2010,2012, the U.S. Congress enactedObama Administration announced the new corporate average fuel economy (CAFE) regulations that would increaseCAFE standard for cars and light-duty trucks, raising the U.S. fuel-economy standard industry average for passenger cars to 35the equivalent of 54.5 miles per gallon, by year 2016, while light trucks will be required to meet nearly 28 miles per gallon by 2016.2025. As a result, OEMs and suppliers are competing intensely to develop and market new and alternative technologies, such as electric vehicles, hybrid vehicles, fuel cells, diesel engines and efficiency improvements of driveline systems to improve fuel economy and emissions.


21




We are responding to the continuing change in vehicle mix in the North American market as well as expected increases in CAFE regulations, with ongoing research and development (R&D) efforts that focus on fuel economy, emission reduction and environmental improvements. These efforts have led to new business awards for products that support AWD and RWD passenger cars and crossover vehicles and further position us to compete as this product mix shift continues. We are continuing to invest in the development of advanced products focused on fuel economy, mass reductions, vehicle safety and performance, while leveraging electronics and technology. We have increased our focus on alternative energy and electronics by investing in product development that is consistent with the continued shift in market demand. Approximately 75% of AAM's new and incremental business backlog launching from 2015 to 2017, which is an estimated $825 million, relates to AAM's newest AWD systems for passenger cars and crossover vehicles. These systems are designed to improve fuel efficiency by up to 30%, reduce CO2 emissions and provide AWD capability with the additional benefit of improved vehicle stability when compared to traditional mechanical AWD systems. We have also developed and commercialized a disconnecting AWD system, which strengthens AAM's position as a leader in global driveline systems technology. AAM's EcoTrac® Disconnecting AWD system is an industry-first technology that seamlessly engages AWD functionality while improving fuel efficiency and reducing CO2 emissions. The system is featured on the award-winning Jeep Cherokee and Chrysler 200.

AAM has established a high-efficiency product portfolio that is designed to improve axle efficiency and fuel economy through innovative product design technology. Our lineup of high efficiency axles for rear-wheel drive and AWD applications is featured on multiple new vehicles, including GM's Cadillac ATS, which was named the 2013 North American Car of the Year. Our high efficiency rear-drive module is also featured on the Cadillac CTS, Motor Trend's 2014 Car of the Year. Through the development of our EcoTrac® Disconnecting AWD system, our high efficiency axles, PowerLite® axles, PowerDense® gears and our e-AAM hybrid and electric driveline systems, we have significantly advanced our efforts to improve fuel efficiency and ride and handling performance while reducing emissions and mass.

INCREASE IN DEMAND FOR ELECTRONIC INTEGRATION The electronic content of vehicles continues to expand, largely driven by consumer demand for greater vehicle performance, functionality, and affordable convenience options. This demand is a result of increased communication abilities in vehicles as well as increasingly stringent regulatory standards for energy efficiency, emissions reduction and increased safety. As these electronics continue to become more reliable and affordable, we expect this trend to continue. The increased use of electronics provides greater flexibility in vehicles and enables the OEMs to better control vehicle stability, fuel efficiency and safety while improving the overall driving experience. Suppliers with enhanced capability in electronic integration have greater sourcing opportunities with OEMs and may be able to obtain more favorable pricing for these products.

We are respondingGLOBAL AUTOMOTIVE PRODUCTION The trend toward the globalization of automotive production continues to the continuing changeintensify in vehicle mixregions such as Asia (particularly China, India, South Korea and Thailand), Eastern Europe and South America. Automotive production in these regions is expected to continue to grow while production in the traditional automotive centers such as North American market as well as expected increasesAmerica and Western Europe have improved from recent declines. As our customers continue to design their products for global markets, they will continue to require global support from their suppliers. For this reason, it is critical that we maintain a global presence in CAFE regulations, with ongoing research and development (R&D) efforts that focus on fuel economy, emission reduction and environmental improvements. These efforts position usthese markets in order to compete as this product mix shift continues and have led toremain competitive for new business awards for products that support AWD and RWD passenger cars and crossover vehicles. We are continuing to invest in the development of advanced products focused on fuel economy, mass reductions, vehicle safety and performance leveraging electronics and technology.contracts. We have significantly increased our focus on alternative energyglobal installed capacity to support current programs and electronics by investingfuture opportunities. We have expanded our capacity in product development that is consistent withBrazil, China, Mexico, Poland, Thailand and the expected shiftU.S. and constructed new facilities in market demand.Mexico and the U.S. We also have offices in China, India and South Korea to support these developing markets. We expect our business activity in these markets to increase significantly over the next several years. Approximately 50%60% of AAM'sour new and incremental business backlog launching from 2012is for end use markets outside the U.S. and approximately

21


85% has been sourced to 2014, which is an estimated $1.1 billion, relates to AAM's newest AWD systems for passenger cars and crossover vehicles. In 2010, we entered into a joint venture with Saab in whichour manufacturing facilities outside the new company, e-AAM, will design and commercialize electric all-wheel-drive (eAWD) hybrid driveline systems for passenger cars and crossover vehicles. We have also developed and commercialized a disconnecting AWD system and established our new EcoTrac™ brand of fuel-efficient and environment-friendly driveline products, which strengthens AAM's position as a leader in global driveline systems technology. The EcoTrac™ brand includes the eAWD systems, the disconnecting AWD systems and a full range of high-efficiency axles. Through our establishment of e-AAM and the development of our EcoTrac™ brand, we have made great progress on our focus to improve fuel efficiency and ride and handling performance while reducing emissions.U.S.



22




RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
 
NET SALES Net sales increased by 13%15% to $2,585.03,696.0 million in 20112014 as compared to $2,283.03,207.3 million in 20102013 and $1,521.62,930.9 million in 20092012.

OurThe increase in sales in 2011,2014, as compared to 2010, reflect2013, primarily reflects an increase of approximately 7.5% in production volumes for the major North American light truck and SUV programs we currently support. These increases reflect the improvement in both general economic conditions and market conditions in the automotive industry.

Our sales in 2010, as compared to 2009, reflect an increase of approximately 42%8% in production volumes for the North American light truck and SUV programs we currently support for GM and Chrysler.  These increasesChrysler and higher sales in support of Chrysler's AWD Jeep Cherokee.

Our sales in 2013, as compared to 2012, reflect the impact of the stabilization of general economic conditions, improving market conditions in the automotive industry and the adverse impact of the extended production shutdowns in 2009, which was estimated at $304.3 million.  Thean increase in sales also reflectsglobal launch activity principally related to higher production volumes for the favorable impact of recent new product launches, many of whichmajor North American light truck programs we currently support, passenger caradditional content on GM and crossover vehicle platforms.Chrysler's next generation full-size pickup truck programs and a 17% increase in non-GM sales.

Our content-per-vehicle (CPV) (as measured by the dollar value of our products supporting our customers' North American light truck and SUV programs) increased to $1,4871,667 in 20112014 as compared to $1,4411,550 in 20102013 and $1,4031,473 in 2009.2012. The increaseincreases in 2011CPV in 2014 as compared to 2010 is primarily due to mix shifts favoring the next generation of heavy-duty trucks for GM2013, and higher metal market pass throughs. The increase in 20102013 as compared to 2009 is primarily due to higher metal market pass throughs partially offset by a change in the billing process for consigned components for the Dodge Ram program2012, principally reflect additional content on GM and the adverse impact in the first half of 2010 associated with timing of the launch of theChrysler's next generation heavy-dutyfull-size pickup truck for GM in June 2010.programs.

Our 4WD/AWD penetration rate wasincreased to 63.0%68.5% in 20112014 as compared to 64.2%66.1% in 20102013 and 64.1%64.4% in 20092012. We define 4WD/AWD penetration as the total number of front axles we produce divided by the total number of rear axles we produce for the vehicle programs we support.

GROSS PROFIT (LOSS) Gross profit (loss) was a profit ofincreased to $455.1522.8 million in 20112014 as compared to a profit of $401.7478.7 million in 20102013 and a loss of $31.1399.7 million in 20092012. Gross margin was 17.6% in both 2011 and 2010 and negative 2.0%14.1% in 20092014. as compared to 14.9% in 2013 and 13.6% in 2012. The increase in gross profit in 20112014 as compared to 20102013 is primarily reflectsdue to the positiveprofit contribution from higher sales, including our largest North American light truck programs and other global launches. Gross profit in 2014 also included the adverse impact of an increasea $31.2 million settlement charge related to a voluntary lump-sum pension payout which was offered to eligible terminated vested participants in sales and productivity gains, partially offset by special charges and the impact of the implementation of certain provisions of the 2009 Settlement and Commercial Agreement with GM. These provisions were effective January 1, 2011 and, among other things, include expanded warranty cost sharing and product price-downs. our U.S. hourly pension plans.

The increase in gross profit and gross margin in 2010,2013 as compared to 2009, reflects2012 is primarily due to the positiveprofit contribution from higher sales, including our largest North American light truck programs and other global launches. The increase in gross profit in 2013 also reflected lower warranty accruals and the impact of an increasestabilized levels of global launch activity, which includes lower material and freight costs, as compared to 2012. In addition, our gross profit in sales, lower special charges and2013 also included the favorable impact of structural cost reductions taken in 2008 and 2009.receiving $11.4 million related to settling a capacity increase cancellation claim with one of our largest customers, which is partially offset by other costs associated with this capacity increase.

Gross profit in 2011 includes2012 included special charges and other non-recurring operating costs of $15.0 million, which includes $8.7$28.7 million of asset impairment charges and indirect inventory obsolescenceexpense related to contractual termination benefits provided to certain eligible UAW associates as a result of the announcedDMC and CKMF plant closures and $32.5 million of expense primarily related to asset impairments, asset redeployment and other restructuring costs associated with the closure of DMC and CKMF. The impact on gross profit as a result of these special charges was partially offset by a $21.8 million other postretirement benefits (OPEB) curtailment gain recorded as a result of the DMC and CKMF hourly associates who have terminated employment from AAM as a result of our plant closures and $6.3a $5.2 million settlement gain related to the termination of other plant closure related costs. Grossthe UAW Legal Services Plan. Also included in gross profit in 2011 also includes2012, is a $6.1gain of $2.2 million gain related to the sale of equipment that we had previously written down to its estimated fair value as a result of asset impairments.

22



Gross profit in 2010 includes the adverse impact of an arbitration ruling related to the transfer of certain production from DMC to another AAM facility for which we recorded a charge of $5.3 million for wages and benefits owed to certain UAW represented associates at the DMC. Gross profit in 2010 also includes net special charges of $1.1 million related to $8.7 million of asset impairment and related charges at our Salem Manufacturing Facility, net of $7.6 million of adjustments to previously recorded estimates for Supplemental Unemployment Benefits (SUB), idled leased assets and one-time termination benefit accruals.

The gross loss in 2009 includes the adverse impact of extended production shutdowns at GM and Chrysler, which is estimated at $95.0 million.  Gross loss in 2009 also included $166.7 million in net special charges and other non-recurring operating costs, which primarily relate to asset impairments, indirect inventory obsolescence, idled leased assets and the acceleration of Buydown Program (BDP) expense. These net special charges also include gains related to the curtailment of certain pension and other postretirement benefits (OPEB) primarily related to associates at our original U.S. locations who elected to accelerate their remaining BDP payments and terminate employment with AAM in 2009.CKMF.

SELLING, GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES (SG&A) SG&A (including R&D) was $231.7255.2 million in 20112014 as compared to $197.6238.4 million in 20102013 and $172.7243.3 million in 20092012. SG&A as a percentage of net sales was 9.0%6.9% in 20112014, 8.7%7.4% in 20102013 and 11.3%8.3% in 20092012. The increase in SG&A in 2011 primarily reflects increased R&D spending, including costs related to e-AAM, a joint venture we formed in the fourth quarter of 2010 to develop and commercialize electric AWD hybrid driveline systems for passenger cars and crossover vehicles. The increase in SG&A in 2010 as compared to 2009 reflects increased R&D spending and higher profit sharing accruals and other incentive compensation expense due to increased profitability, partially offset by lower professional fees related to restructuring actions.  

In the third quarter of 2011, Saab Automobile AB (Saab), our partner in the e-AAM joint venture, entered a voluntary reorganization process. As a result, in the third quarter of 2011, we recorded a $1.6 million impairment charge to SG&A to write off the intangible asset associated with the long-term supply agreement with Saab acquired as part of our joint venture formation in 2010.

SG&A in 2010 included a $3.3 million write down of administrative and engineering facilities located in Detroit, Michigan. SG&A in 2009 included special charges of $2.6 million, which primarily related to salaried workforce reductions.  In addition, we incurred approximately $9.0 million of professional fees related to restructuring actions in 2009. 
R&D In 2011, R&D spending in product, process and systems, net of customer engineering, design and development (ED&D) recoveries, was $113.6103.9 million in 2014 as compared to $82.5103.4 million in 20102013 and $67.0123.4 million in 20092012. The focuschange in SG&A in 2014 as compared to 2013 is primarily due to an increase in costs associated with upgrades to our enterprise resource planning (ERP) systems. SG&A in 2014 also included the adverse impact of this investment continuesa $4.3 million settlement charge related to be developing innovative driveline and drivetrain systems and components for light trucks, SUVs, passenger cars, crossover vehicles and commercial vehicles in the global marketplace. Product development in this area includes power transfer units, transfer cases, driveline and transmission differentials, multipiece driveshafts, halfshafts, torque transfer devices, and front and rear drive axles. We continuea voluntary lump-sum pension payout which was offered to focus on electronic integrationeligible terminated vested participants in our existing and future products to advance their performance. We also continue to support the development of hybrid vehicle systems. Special focus is also placed on the development of products and systems that provide our customers with efficiency, fuel economy and emissions reduction advancements. Our efforts in these areas have resulted in the development of prototypes and various configurations of these driveline systems for several OEMs throughout the world. In 2010, we entered into a joint venture with Saab, e-AAM, which will develop and commercialize eAWD systems designed to improve fuel efficiency up to 30%, reduce CO2 emissions and provide all-wheel-drive capability. We also won an industry-first order for our EcoTrac™ AWD fuel economy optimization system.U.S. salaried pension plan.

The change in SG&A in 2013 as compared to 2012 primarily reflects the favorable impact of lower R&D expense, which included customer ED&D recoveries. This was partially offset by higher incentive compensation accruals and stock-based compensation expense.


23




OPERATING INCOME (LOSS) Operating income (loss) was income ofincreased to $223.4267.6 million in 20112014 as compared to income of $204.1240.3 million in 20102013 and a loss of $203.8156.4 million in 20092012. Operating margin was 8.6%7.2% in 20112014 as compared to 8.9%7.5% in 20102013 and negative 13.4%5.3% in 20092012. The changes in operating income and operating margin in 20112014, 20102013 and 20092012 were due to the factors discussed in Sales, Gross Profit (Loss) and SG&A.

INTEREST EXPENSE Interest expense was $83.999.9 million in 20112014, $89.0115.9 million in 20102013 and $84.5101.6 million in 20092012. The decrease in interest expense 2011in 2014 as compared to 2010 relates primarily2013 reflects the decrease in our weighted-average interest rate and lower average outstanding borrowings during 2014 as compared to higher capitalized interest as a result of increased capital expenditures to support our significant global program launches.2013. The increase in interest expense in 20102013 as compared to 2009 primarily2012 reflects higher interest rates and amortization of debt issuance costs in 2010 as compared to 2009.average outstanding borrowings.

23



The weighted-average interest rate of our total debt outstanding was 8.0%6.3%, 8.1%7.3% and 7.3%7.8% during 20112014, 20102013 and 20092012, respectively.

INVESTMENT INCOME Investment income was $1.22.1 million in 2011, $3.8 million in 20102014 and $2.00.6 million in both 20092013.and 2012. Investment income includes interest and dividends earned on cash and cash equivalents and short-term investments during the period. Investment income includes a gain of $0.1 million and $2.3 million in 2011 and 2010, respectively, related to distributions of our short-term investments from which distributions were previously suspended. Investment income in 2009 includes a loss of $1.3 million as a result of an other-than-temporary decline in the fair value of our short-term investments.

OTHER INCOME (EXPENSE) Following are the components of Other Income (Expense) for 20112014, 20102013 and 20092012:

Debt refinancing and redemption costs In 2011,2013, we expensed $3.1$36.8 million of unamortized debt issuance costs, discount and prepayment premiums related to the termination of our class C loan facility, the purchase and voluntary redemption of $300.0 million of our 7.875% senior unsecured notes (7.875% Notes) and the voluntary redemption of the remaining $340.0 million of our 9.25% senior secured notes (9.25% Notes). In 2012, we expensed $19.8 million of unamortized debt issuance costs, discount and prepayment premiums related to our amended and restated revolving credit agreement, the purchase and redemption of $250.0 million of our 5.25% senior unsecured notes and the voluntary redemption of $42.5 million of our 9.25% Notes and the termination of our Second Lien Term Loan with GM. In 2009, we expensed $7.7 million of unamortized debt issuance costs related to the voluntary prepayment of our term loan and a portion of our Amended Revolving Credit Facility that was scheduled to become due April 2010.Notes.

Other, net Other, net, which includes the net effect of foreign exchange gains and losses and our proportionate share of earnings from equity in unconsolidated subsidiaries, was net income of $0.56.9 million in 20112014, expense of $0.1 million in 2010 and expense of $3.11.9 million and $4.1 million in 20092013. and 2012, respectively.

INCOME TAX EXPENSE (BENEFIT) Income tax expense (benefit) was an expense of $1.033.7 million in 20112014 as compared to expensea benefit of $4.38.2 million and $335.2 million in 20102013 and a benefit of $43.8 million2012 in 2009., respectively. Our effective income tax rate was 0.7%19.1% in 20112014 as compared to negative 3.6%9.5% in 20102013 and negative 14.7%1,064.2% in 20092012.

The following is a reconciliation of our provision for income taxes to the expected amounts using statutory rates:

2011 2010 20092014 2013 2012
Federal statutory35.0 % 35.0 % 35.0 %35.0 % 35.0 % 35.0 %
Foreign income taxes(34.6) (42.9) 11.6
(25.1) (48.5) (85.0)
Change in enacted tax rates
 (9.9) 
State and local(1.2) 1.6
 0.1
0.1
 0.2
 3.5
Tax credits(11.4) 
 
Valuation allowance(30.7) (39.3) (10.2)4.5
 12.4
 (985.0)
U.S. tax on unremitted foreign earnings26.3
 49.6
 (33.2)1.9
 (0.2) (29.5)
NOL carryback refund
 
 16.4
Uncertain tax positions13.0
 (0.5) (5.2)
Other5.9
 (0.4) (5.0)1.1
 2.0
 2.0
Effective income tax rate0.7 % 3.6 % 14.7 %19.1 % (9.5)% (1,064.2)%

Our income tax expense and effective tax rate for 2014 and 2013 primarily reflect favorable foreign tax rates, along with our inability to realize a tax benefit for current foreign losses. In 2014, we recorded tax expense of $23.1 million for changes to prior year uncertain tax positions related to transfer pricing and expense of $3.4 million for a change in 2011 reflects the effect of recognizingestimate for U.S. tax on unremitted foreign earnings. We also recorded a net operating loss (NOL)tax benefit againstof $20.1 million in 2014 related to our taxable incomeability to utilize tax credits in future periods resulting in the recognition of a deferred tax asset.


24




In 2013, new Mexican tax reform was enacted that, among other things, increased the tax rate related to Maquiladora Companies from 17.5% to 30%. We recorded a tax benefit of $8.5 million as a result of revaluing our deferred tax assets at the newly enacted rate. In 2013, we recorded tax expense of $4.8 million relating to changes in estimates in the U.S. and certain foreign jurisdictions. Our income tax benefit and effective tax rate for 2013 also reflects the impact of recording a tax benefit of $1.5 million relating to the release of a prior year unrecognized tax benefit due to the expiration of the applicable statute of limitations and a tax benefit of $3.3 million relating to an election we made in 2013 regarding the treatment of foreign exchange gains and losses in a foreign jurisdiction. During 2013, we also settled various income tax audits resulting in a reduction of our liability for unrecognized income tax benefits of $8.4 million and a cash payment of $4.7 million.
In 2012, our business returned to a position of cumulative profitability on a pre-tax basis, considering our operating results for the three years ended December 31, 2012. We concluded that this record of cumulative profitability in recent years, in addition to the restructuring of our U.S. operations and our long range forecast showing continued profitability, provided sufficient positive evidence that our net U.S. federal tax benefits more likely than not would be realized. Accordingly, in 2012, we released the valuation allowance against our net federal deferred tax assets for entities in the U.S., resulting in a $337.5 million benefit in our 2012 provision for income taxes. Our income tax benefit and effective tax rate in 2012 reflected the impact of this valuation allowance reversal.
Our income tax expense and effective tax rate for 20112012 also reflectsreflect a net tax benefitsexpense of $4.5$1.3 million relatingrelated to the favorable resolutionamendment of state income tax returns as a result of the settlement of federal income tax audits infor the U.S.tax years 2004 through 2007.

As of December 31, 2014 and the impacts of tax law changes in Brazil and the state of Michigan. Our current low effective tax rate is primarily the result of ourDecember 31, 2013, we have a valuation allowance againstof $156.9 million and $163.7 million, respectively, related to net deferred tax assets. Sustained levels of profitability are expected to lead to a reversal of the majority of our valuation allowance, which could occur as early as the second half of 2012.assets in several foreign jurisdictions and U.S. state and local jurisdictions. See "Critical Accounting Estimates – Valuation of Deferred Tax Assets and Other Tax Liabilities" below for more detail on the impact of this reversal.

Our income tax expense and effective tax rate for 2010 reflects the effect of recognizing an NOL benefit against our taxable income in the U.S. In conjunction with the filing of our 2009 federal tax return, under provisions contained in the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009, we recorded a tax benefit of $1.4 million in 2010 attributable to the monetization of alternative minimum tax and research and development credits. We received this tax refund during the fourth quarter of 2010.

24



Our income tax expense and effective tax rate for 2009 reflects the effect of recording a tax benefit of $48.8 million related to the extension of the carryback period of our 2008 NOL and recording a valuation allowance against income tax benefits on losses in the U.S. and certain foreign subsidiaries. In 2009, we also established a deferred tax liability of $118.8 million which represented the estimated tax impact of the undistributed earnings of certain foreign subsidiaries as we believed these accumulated foreign earnings in certain jurisdictions were likely to be remitted to the U.S. as dividends or intercompany loans.
NET LOSS ATTRIBUTABLE TO NONCONTROLLING INTERESTS Net loss attributable to noncontrolling interests was $5.7 million in 2011, $0.9 million in 2010 and $0.2 million in 2009. The increase in 2011 primarily reflects the portion of the net expenses of e-AAM that relates to noncontrolling interests, which included an impairment charge of $0.5 million in 2011 related to the write off of the Saab intangible asset. The increase in 2010 as compared to 2009 primarily reflects the portion of the net loss of e-AAM that relates to noncontrolling interests.

NET INCOME (LOSS) ATTRIBUTABLE TO AAM AND EARNINGS (LOSS) PER SHARE (EPS) Net income (loss) attributable to AAM was income of $142.8143.0 million in 20112014 as compared to income of $115.494.5 million in 20102013 and a loss of $253.1367.7 million in 20092012. Diluted earnings (loss)per share was earnings of $1.891.85 in 2014 as compared to $1.23 per share in 20112013 as compared to earnings ofand $1.554.87 per share in 2010 and a loss of $4.81 per share in 20092012. Net Income (Loss) and EPS were primarily impacted by the factors discussed in Gross Profit, (Loss), SG&A, Interest Expense, Debt Refinancing and Redemption Costs and Income Tax Expense (Benefit).

LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

Our primary liquidity needs are to fund capital expenditures, debt service obligations employee benefit plan obligations and our working capital investments.requirements.  We believe that operating cash flow, available cash and cash equivalent balances and available committed borrowing capacity under our Amended Revolving Credit Facilityrevolving credit facility will be sufficient to meet these needs.

OPERATING ACTIVITIES Net cash used inprovided by operating activities was $56.3318.4 million in 20112014 as compared to net cash provided by operating activities of $240.3223.0 million in 20102013 and net cash provided byused in operating activities of $15.9175.5 million in 20092012. See below for more detail on important factors related to our cash flow from operations.

Sales and production volumes Cash provided by operating activities was favorably impacted by higher profits related to an increase in sales and production activity in 20112014, 2013 and 2010.  Cash flow from operations in 2009 was adversely affected by significant reductions in revenues and profits. This includes the impact of the extended production shutdowns by our largest customers in 2009, estimated at $95 million.2012.

2009 Settlement and Commercial AgreementDeferred Revenue In conjunction with the 2009 Settlement and Commercial Agreementfirst quarter of 2014, we reached an agreement with GM to increase installed capacity and adjust product mix for our largest vehicle program. As a result of this agreement, we received $110.0$32.8 million in 2014 and recorded the payments as deferred revenue, of which we recognized $5.4 million of revenue related to this agreement in 2014. As of December 31, 2014, we have $6.9 million of deferred revenue that is classified as a current liability and $20.5 million of deferred revenue that is recorded as a noncurrent liability on our Consolidated Balance Sheet.

Also in the first quarter of 2014, we reached an agreement with GM to recover certain costs related to the delay of another major product program. We initially recorded deferred revenue of $9.3 million related to this agreement. We began recognizing this deferred revenue as revenue in the third quarter of 2009, $79.72014 when this program launched in certain markets. In 2014, we recognized revenue of $0.5 million related to this agreement. As of December 31,

25




2014 we have recorded deferred revenue of $8.8 million, $1.1 million of which is classified as cash flow from operations.

As part of the 2009 Settlementa current liability and Commercial Agreement, we also agreed to expedited payment terms of “net 10 days” from GM (as compared to previously existing terms of approximately 45 days) in exchange for a 1% early payment discount. We estimated that the accelerated payment terms favorably impacted cash flow from operations by approximately $62$7.7 million in 2009 and $23 million in 2010. On June 30, 2011, we elected to terminate the expedited payment terms and transition to GM standard weekly payment terms of approximately 50 days.  As a result of the termination of these expedited payment terms in 2011, our operating cash flow was negatively impacted by approximately $190 million in the third quarter of 2011.
Incentive compensation payments We paid approximately $31.0 million in 2011, approximately $5.0 million in 2010 and approximately $3.0 million in 2009 related to incentive compensationwhich is recorded as a result ofnoncurrent liability on our increased profitability and statutory requirements in certain jurisdictions.Consolidated Balance Sheet.

CashInterest paid for special charges In 2011, we made cash payments of Interest paid in 2014 was $34.691.1 million for special charges primarily relatedas compared to asset redeployment and other costs associated with our announced plant closures of DMC and CKMF and leased assets that were permanently idled prior to 2011. We paid $46.9123.2 million in 2013 and $60.188.9 million in 2012. The decrease in interest paid in 2014 as compared to 2013 primarily relates to a reduction in interest expense driven by lower average outstanding borrowings and lower average interest rates in 2014 as compared to 2013. The increase in interest paid in 2013, as compared to 2012, primarily reflects higher average outstanding borrowings during the year and the early payment of interest related to our ongoing restructuring actions in debt refinancing.2010 and 2009, respectively. These cash payments primarily related to hourly and salaried workforce reductions initiated prior to 2010.  We expect to make payments of $0.9 million in 2012 related to our remaining restructuring accrual as of December 31, 2011.

25



In the third quarter of 2011 we notified the International UAW of our decision to close the CKMF on or after February 26, 2012, the expiration of our current collective bargaining agreement with the International UAW. We had previously notified the International UAW of our decision to close DMC on or after February 26, 2012 in the second quarter of 2011. We incurred asset redeployment and other non-recurring operating costs of $6.7 million and $8.3 million of capital expenditures associated with the announced closure of DMC and CKMF in 2011. We expect to incur approximately $20 million of additional asset redeployment and other plant closure related costs and approximately $25 million to $30 million of additional capital expenditures associated with the completion of these plant closures in 2012. These estimates do not include costs, if any, related to the resolution of bargaining with the International UAW related to these plant closures.

In the fourth quarter of 2011, we paid $18.6 million for purchase buyouts of leased equipment, of which $13.4 million is included in the investing section of our Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows.

Pension and OPEB Due to our significant pension contributions made in 2012, we were not required to make any cash payments in 2014 or 2013 to satisfy our regulatory funding requirements. We contributed $52.0$225.4 million to our pension trusts in 2011,2012, which includes $26 million of contributions that were in excess ofincluded our minimum statutoryregulatory funding requirements for the 2011 calendar year, as compared to $44.0 million in 2010 and $24.9 million in 2009. Thisof $35.0 million. These funding comparesfigures compare to our annual pension expense, including special and contractual termination benefits and settlements of $14.532.0 million in 20112014, $12.65.7 million in 20102013 and $13.524.6 million in 2009. We expect our regulatory pension funding requirements in 2012 to be approximately $35 million.

In 2012, AAM and the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation entered into an agreement regarding any liability that may have arisen under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 in connection with the closures of DMC and CKMF. As part of this agreement, in 2012, we contributed $114.7 million in excess of our statutory minimum to our U.S. hourly pension plan, which is included in the contributions described above.

Our cash outlay for OPEB, net of GM cost sharing, was $11.8 million in 2014, $11.2 millionin 2013, and$11.5 million in 2011, $10.4 million in 2010 and $16.1 million in 20092012. This compares to our annual postretirement benefit,cost, including curtailmentsspecial and contractual termination benefits, curtailment gains and settlements, of an expense of $15.213.4 million in 20112014, expense of $12.612.7 million in 20102013, and a credit of $55.73.3 million in 20092012. We expect our cash outlay for other postretirement benefit obligations in 20122015, net of GM cost sharing, to be approximately $16 million.

2008 AAM-GM Agreement In 2008,On September 22, 2014, we entered into an agreement with GMannounced a plan to offer a voluntary one-time lump sum payment option to certain eligible terminated vested participants in connection with the resolution of the strike called by the International UAW (2008 our U.S. pension plans that, if accepted, would settle our pension obligations to them (“AAM - GM Agreement) inPension Payout Offer”). The lump sum settlements, which GM agreedwere paid from plan assets, reduced our liabilities and administrative costs going forward.

The AAM Pension Payout Offer was open from October 2, 2014 through November 12, 2014 to provide us with $175.0 million to support the transitionapproximately 6,000 of our UAW represented legacy labor at14,000 total U.S. pension plan participants. In addition to the lump sum payment option, the AAM Pension Payout Offer allowed participants to commence payment of their monthly benefits early.
In total, 3,335 participants accepted the offer and we made a one-time lump sum payment from our originalpension trust of $104.2 million on December 19, 2014. As a result of this settlement, we remeasured the assets and liabilities of our U.S. locations.  We received $115.0pension plans, which reduced our projected benefit obligation by $131.1 million and resulted in a non-cash charge of $35.5 million in 2008 and collected the remaining $60.0 million from GM in 2009.fourth quarter of 2014 related to the accelerated recognition of certain deferred losses.

Accounts receivable Accounts receivable at year-end 20112014 were $333.3532.7 million as compared to $146.6458.5 million at year-end 20102013 and $129.7463.4 million at year-end 20092012. The increase in our year-end 20112014 accounts receivable balance was primarily reflects the termination of expedited payment terms with GM and the transitiondue to standard weekly payment terms of approximately 50 days, effective June 30, 2011. The increase in our year-end 2010 accounts receivable balance primarily reflects an increase inincreased sales in the fourth quarter of 2010November and December 2014 as compared to November and December of 2013, as well as the fourth quartertiming of 2009.weekly payments from GM.

Inventories At year-end 20112014, inventories were $177.2248.8 million as compared to $130.3261.8 million at year-end 20102013 and $90.6224.3 million at year-end 20092012. The decrease in inventory in 2014, as compared to 2013, primarily reflects a reduction in launch related activities at year-end, as well as inventory reduction initiatives. The increase in inventory in 20112013, as compared to 20102012, primarily reflects increased inventory levels relatedmaterials on hand to new program launches, highersupport increased production in existing programs, bank builds related to our pending DMC and CKMF plant closures and the ramp-up of production at our Rayong Manufacturing facility in Thailand. We expect to reduce inventory levels in 2012. The increaseour current programs and new programs launched in inventory in 2010, as compared to 2009, primarily reflects higher sales and production levels, as well as increased inventory at some of our facilities due to the launch of new products.2014.

Accounts payable At year-end 20112014, accounts payable were $337.1444.3 million as compared to $283.6437.4 million at year-end 20102013 and $200.9387.7 million at year-end 20092012. The increase in accounts payable at year-end 20112013, as compared to year-end 2010 primarily reflects higher production levels, higher capital expenditures and the ramp up of activity at some of our foreign locations. The increase in accounts payable at year-end 2010 compared to year-end 20092012, primarily reflects an increase in sales and production levels and a normalization of payment terms with our suppliers.volumes.

InterestCash paid for special charges Interest paidIn 2012, we made cash payments of $37.9 million for special charges primarily related to asset redeployment, capital expenditures and other costs associated with the closure of DMC and CKMF in 2012.2011 was $73.1 million as compared to $61.6 million in 2010 and $80.0 million in 2009. The increase in interest paid in 2011 as compared to 2010 relates primarily to higher average outstanding borrowings during the year. The decrease in interest paid in 2010 as compared to 2009 relates to the timing of interest payments on the 9.25% Notes. The amount of accrued interest included in other accrued expenses on our Consolidated Balance Sheet was $32.0 million and $31.1 million as of December 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively.


26




Accrued compensation and benefits At year-end 2011, accrued compensation and benefits was $110.6 million as compared to $115.1 million at year-end 2010 and $98.9 million at year-end 2009. The increase in accrued compensation and benefits at year-end 2010 compared to year-end 2009 primarily reflected higher profit sharing accruals and other incentive compensation accruals that we paid in the first quarter of 2011.

Refundable income taxesGM Payment Terms At year-end 2011, prepaid assets and other on our Consolidated Balance Sheet included refundable income taxes of $3.5 million as compared to $5.9 million at year-end 2010 and $52.7 million at year-end 2009. The decrease in refundable income taxes in 2010 as compared to 2009 was primarily due to the the collection of the $48.8 million refund we received asAs a result of a special carryback election which enabled uschange in the administration of GM supplier payment terms from pay on shipment to carrybackpay on receipt, our 2008 NOL to 2003.operating cash flow was negatively impacted by approximately $33.1 million in 2012.

INVESTING ACTIVITIES Capital expenditures were $163.1206.5 million in 20112014, $108.3251.9 million in 20102013 and $137.7207.6 million in 20092012. In 2011, ourOur capital spending primarily supported our significant global program launches in 2011 and 2012 within our new and incremental business backlog.backlog, as well as the upgrades to our ERP systems.

We expect our capital spending in 20122015 to be in the rangeapproximately 5% of 6.0% to 6.5% of sales, (or approximately $175 million), which includes support for our significant global program launches in 20122015 and 20132016 within our new and incremental business backlog.

In 2010,the first quarter of 2014, we formed a joint venture (JV) with Saab Automobile AB (Saab), e-AAM Driveline Systems AB (e-AAM). AAM issold our Detroit Manufacturing Complex and received net proceeds of $9.2 million related to this transaction. For the majority owner, owning 67% of the shares in this JV while Saab owns the remaining 33%. In connection with the formation of e-AAM, we agreed to contribute ongoing funding to cover e-AAM's business operations through 2012 that we estimated to be approximately $26 million, based on current exchange rates at that time, of whichyear ended December 31, 2014, we have paid approximately $16classified $7.2 million in 2011 and $5 million in 2010. Inof these proceeds, which represents the fourth quarter of 2011, Saab filed for bankruptcy and has entered into liquidation status. We are currently in the process of negotiating the purchase of Saab's shares in this JV.

In 2009, we formed a JV with Hefei Automobile Axle Co, Ltd., (HAAC), a subsidiary of the JAC Group (Anhui Jianghuai Automobile Group Co, Ltd).  In the fourth quarter or 2011, we expanded our existing JV with HAAC to include HAAC's light commercial axle business. We made an initial investment of $10.2 million in 2009amount related to the formation of this JVland and an additional investment of $16.5 million in 2011 related to the expansion of this JV. Each party continues to own 50 percent of the JV,building for which we account for underwill have no future continuing involvement, in the equity methodInvesting Activities section of accounting.our Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows.

In 2008, certain money-market2013 and other similar funds that2012, we invested in temporarily suspended redemptions.entered into various sale-leaseback transactions for equipment recently purchased. We received $6.4proceeds of $24.1 million and $71.6$12.1 million of redemptions in 20102013 and 2009, respectively.2012, respectively, related to these transactions.

FINANCING ACTIVITIES Net cash provided byused in financing activities was $167.221.4 million in 20112014 as compared to net cash used in financing activities of $66.4 million in 2010 and net cash provided by financing activities of $32.188.8 million in 20092013 and $253.5 million in 2012. Total debt outstanding was $1,180.2$1,536.4 million at year-end 2011, $1,010.02014, $1,559.1 million at year-end 20102013 and $1,071.4$1,454.1 million at year-end 2009. Total debt outstanding increased by $170.2 million at year-end 2011 as compared to year-end 2010 primarily as a result of the issuance of $200.0 million of senior unsecured notes in the fourth quarter of 2011, which was partially offset by using cash flow from operations to redeem 10% of our 9.25% Notes outstanding during the second quarter of 2011.2012. The decrease in total debt outstanding at year-end 20102014, as compared to year-end 20092013, was primarily due to using cash flow from operationsrepayments on certain current maturities of long-term debt. The increase in total debt outstanding at year-end 2013, as compared to pay downyear-end 2012, was primarily due to the amount outstandingissuance of $400.0 million of 6.25% senior unsecured notes, $200.0 million of 5.125% senior unsecured notes (5.125% Notes) and $150.0 million drawn under our Revolving Credit Facility asterm facility, which was partially offset by using these proceeds to purchase and redeem $300.0 million of December 31, 2009.our 7.875% Notes and to redeem the remaining $340.0 million of our 9.25% Notes.

Amended Revolving Credit FacilityREVOLVING CREDIT FACILITY AND TERM FACILITY In the second quarter of 2011, we amended and restated the Credit Agreement dated as of January 9, 2004 (as amended and restated, the “Amended and Restated Revolving Credit Agreement” and the facility thereunder, the “Amended Revolving Credit Facility”). As of December 31, 20112014, the Amended Revolving Credit Facilityrevolving credit facility provided up to $86.8$523.5 million of revolving bank financing commitments through June 2013 and $235.0 million of such revolving bank financing commitments through June 30, 2016.September 13, 2018. At December 31, 20112014, $293.3505.5 million was available under the Amended Revolving Credit Facility,revolving credit facility, which reflected a reduction of $28.518.0 million for standby letters of credit issued against the facility.

The Amendedcredit agreement provides for a senior secured term loan A facility in an aggregate principal amount of $150.0 million (term facility). During 2014, we made principal payments of $7.5 million on our term facility. We also paid remaining debt issuance costs of $0.1 million in 2014 associated with the execution of amending our revolving credit facility and Restated Revolving Credit Agreement, among other things, increased the aggregate commitments by approximately $79.0 millionterm facility. In 2013 and extended the maturity of $235.0 million of the aggregate commitments to June 30, 2016. We2012, we paid debt issuance costs of $5.9 million, $1.6$6.9 million and $14.5$1.7 million, respectively, associated with the amendments and restatements of our Revolving Credit Facility in 2011, 2010 and 2009, respectively.revolving credit facility.

27



Borrowings under the Amended Revolving Credit Facilityrevolving credit facility and term facility bear interest at rates based on adjusted LIBOR or an alternate base rate, plus an applicable margin. The applicable margin for LIBOR basedLIBOR-based loans for lenders who extended their maturities will be between 3.00%1.5% and 4.50%, depending upon the corporate credit ratings of the Company. The applicable margin for lenders who did not extend their maturities remained unchanged.3.0%.

Under the Amended Revolving Credit Facility, werevolving credit facility, certain negative covenants were revised to provide increased flexibility. In the event AAM achieves investment grade corporate credit ratings from S&P and Moody's, AAM may elect to release all of the collateral from the liens granted pursuant to the collateral agreement, subject to notice requirements and other conditions. The revolving credit facility and term facility are required to comply with financial covenants related to secured indebtedness leverage, total net leverage, and cash interest expense coverage. The Amended Revolving Credit Facility limits our ability to make certain investments, declare or pay dividends or distributions on capital stock, redeem or repurchase capital stock and certain debt obligations, incur liens, incur indebtedness, or merge, make acquisitions and sell assets.

The Amended Revolving Credit Facility is secured on a first priority basis by all or substantially all of the assets of Holdings, AAM Inc. and each guarantor party thereto, including a pledge of all capital stock of the U.S. subsidiaries of Holdings and each guarantor and a portion of the capital stock of AAM Inc. and each guarantor's first-tier foreign subsidiaries. In addition, obligations under the Amended Revolving Credit Facility are guaranteed by Holdingscollateral agreement dated as of November 7, 2008, as amended and AAM Inc.'s U.S. subsidiaries, allrestated as of which are directly owned by AAM Inc.September 13, 2013.

The Amended Revolving Credit Facilityrevolving credit facility provides back-up liquidity for our otherforeign credit facilities. We intend to use the availability of long-term financing under the Amended Revolving Credit Facilityrevolving credit facility to refinance any current maturities related to such debt agreements that are not otherwise refinanced on a long-term basis in their local markets.markets, except where otherwise reclassified to current portion of long-term debt on our Consolidated Balance Sheet.


27




In the first quarter of 2013, we terminated our class C loan facility of $72.8 million, which would have matured on June 30, 2013. Upon termination, we expensed $0.5 million of unamortized debt issuance costs related to the class C facility. We had been amortizing the debt issuance costs over the expected life of the borrowing.

9.25% NotesNOTES In 2009, we issued $425.0$425.0 million of 9.25% senior secured notes due 2017 (9.25% Notes). Notes. The notes were issued at a discount of $5.5 million.$5.5 million. Net proceeds from these notes were used for the repayment of certain indebtedness. In 2010 and 2009, we paid debt issuance costs of $0.3 million and $12.6 million, respectively, related to the 9.25% Notes.

In the second quarter of 2011,2012, we elected to exercise an option to redeem 10% of the original amount of our 9.25% Notes outstanding at a redemption price of 103% of the principal amount. This resulted in a principal payment of $42.5$42.5 million and a $1.3$1.3 million payment for the redemption premium, as well as a payment related toof accrued interest. Upon repayment, weWe expensed $1.4$1.0 million in 2012 for the write offwrite-off of a proportional amount of unamortized debt discount and issuance costs related to this debt. Wedebt that we had been amortizing the debt issuance costs and debt discount over the expected life of the borrowing.

Pursuant to the terms of our 9.25% Notes, in the fourth quarter of 2013, we voluntarily redeemed the remaining outstanding 9.25% Notes using the proceeds from the term facility and the issuance of the 5.125% Notes. This resulted in a principal payment of $340.0 million and $18.9 million for redemption premiums, as well as payments of accrued interest. We haveexpensed $6.7 million in 2013 related to the rightwrite-off of the remaining unamortized debt discount and issuance costs related to voluntarily redeem an additional 10% of our 9.25% Notes in June 2012 and another 10% twelve months thereafter.

The 9.25% Notes sharethat we had been amortizing over the collateral package equally and ratably withexpected life of the Amended Revolving Credit Facility as described above. The indenture governing the 9.25% Notes limits our ability to make certain investments, declare or pay dividends or distributions on capital stock, redeem or repurchase capital stock and certain debt obligations, incur liens, incur indebtedness, transact with affiliates or merge, make acquisitions and sell assets.borrowing.

Amended Term Loan7.875% NOTES On December 18, 2009,In the first quarter of 2013, we voluntarily prepaid the amounts outstanding underpurchased and redeemed $300.0 million of our $250.0 million Amended Term Loan.7.875% Notes, and paid accrued interest. Upon repayment,purchase and redemption, we expensed $6.1$8.5 million related to redemption premiums, $0.1 million of professional fees and unamortized debt issuance costs.costs of $2.1 million related to this debt. We had been amortizing the debt issuance costs over the expected life of the borrowing. We paid $5.8 million of debt issuance costs related to the amendment and restatement of our Term Loan in 2009.

Second Lien Term Loan Facility7.75% NOTES As part of the 2009 Settlement and Commercial Agreement with GM,In 2011, we entered into certain agreements which, among other things, provided us with expedited payment terms of “net 10 days” in exchange for a 1% early payment discount and a $100.0 million Second Lien Term Loan Facility with GM through December 31, 2013.  We paidissued $0.3200.0 million of debt issuance costs related to the Second Lien Term Loan Facility in 2010. Pursuant to the terms of such agreements, we elected to terminate the expedited payment terms and the Second Lien Term Loan Agreement, effective June 30, 2011. As a result of these terminations, our Access and Security Agreement with GM expired on September 28, 2011.

7.875% Notes In 2007, we issued $300.0 million of 7.875% senior unsecured notes due 2017. Net proceeds from these notes were used for general corporate purposes, including payment of amounts outstanding under our Revolving Credit Facility.

28



7.75% Notes In the fourth quarter of 2011, we issued $200.0 million of 7.75% senior unsecured notes due 2019 (7.75%(7.75% Notes). Net proceeds from these notes were used for general corporate purposes, including the repayment of certain amounts outstanding under our Amended Revolving Credit Facility. revolving credit facility.

6.625% NOTES In 2011,2012, we issued $550.0 million of 6.625% senior unsecured notes due 2022 (6.625% Notes). Net proceeds from the 6.625% Notes were used to fund the purchase and redemption of $250.0 million of the outstanding 5.25% Notes, including the payment of interest, the redemption of $42.5 million aggregate principal amount of our 9.25% Notes, certain pension obligations and for other general corporate purposes. We paid debt issuance costs of $5.0$8.9 million related to the 7.75%6.625% Notes in 2012.

6.25% NOTES In 2013, we issued $400.0 million of 6.25% senior unsecured notes due 2021 (6.25% Notes). Net proceeds from the 6.25% Notes were used to fund the purchase and redemption of our 7.875% Notes and for other general corporate purposes. We paid debt issuance costs of $6.6 million in 2013 related to the 6.25% Notes.

5.25% Notes5.125% NOTES The 5.25% Notes areIn the fourth quarter of 2013, we issued $200.0 million of 5.125% senior unsecured obligationsnotes due February 2014.

2.00% Convertible2019 (5.125% Notes). Net proceeds from the 5.125% Notes were used to redeem the remaining $190.0 million outstanding under our 9.25% Notes. We paid debt issuance costs related to the 5.125% Notes ofIn 2006, the 2.00% Senior Convertible Notes due 2024 became convertible into cash under terms of the indenture. A total of $0.4 $0.2 million and $2.3$3.1 million of the notes were converted into cash in 20112014 and 2008,2013, respectively. The remaining outstanding 2.00% Convertible Notes were fully redeemed in the third quarter of 2011.

Foreign credit facilities We utilize local currency credit facilities to finance the operations of certain foreign subsidiaries. At December 31, 20112014, $45.238.9 million was outstanding under these facilities and an additional $16.051.1 million was available.

28





Credit ratings To access public debt capital markets, the Company relies on credit rating agencies to assign short-term and long-term credit ratings to our securities as an indicator of credit quality for fixed income investors. A credit rating agency may change or withdraw its ratings based on its assessment of our current and future ability to meet interest and principal repayment obligations. Credit ratings affect our cost of borrowing under our Amended Revolving Credit Faciltyrevolving credit facility and may affect our access to debt capital markets and other costs to fund our business. The credit ratings and outlook currently assigned to our securities by the rating agencies which reflect multiple upgrades during 2011, are as follows:

 Corporate Family RatingSenior Secured Notes RatingSenior Unsecured Notes RatingOutlook
Standard & Poor'sBB-BB+BB+Stable
Moody's Investors ServicesB1Ba1
B1/B2(1)
Stable
Fitch RatingsB+BB-BB+BB-B-PositiveStable

(1)On October 31, 2011, Moody's assigned a B1 rating to AAM's new $200.0 million 7.75% senior unsecured notes and affirmed the B2 rating on existing unsecured notes.

Stock warrants As part of the 2009 Settlement and Commercial Agreement, we issued to GM five year warrants, which entitled GM to purchase 4.1 million shares of AAM's common stock at an exercise price of $2.76 per share.  In the first quarter of 2011, GM exercised these warrants. In accordance with the cashless exercise option available in the agreement, we issued 3.3 million net shares of common stock to GM. We have classified $30.3 million of the payment received from GM as part of the 2009 Settlement and Commercial Agreement as cash flow from financing activities, which represents the grant date fair value of the warrants issued to GM on September 16, 2009.

Issuance of Common Stock In 2009, we sold 16.1 million shares of AAM's common stock, par value $0.01 per share, in a public offering at a price of $7.20 per share for total net proceeds of approximately $109.7 million. Net proceeds from the sale of our common stock were used for general corporate purposes.

Dividend program In 2009, the Company's Board of Directors decided to discontinue the quarterly cash dividend. We have not declared or paid any cash dividends on our common stock in 2011, 20102014, 2013 or 2009.2012.

Purchase of noncontrolling interest In 2012, we paid $4.0 million to acquire the remaining shares of e-AAM. e-AAM, previously a JV between AAM and Saab Automobile AB, was created to design and commercialize electric and hybrid driveline systems designed to improve fuel efficiency, reduce CO2 emissions and provide AWD capability with the additional benefit of improved vehicle stability when compared to traditional mechanical AWD systems.

Stock repurchase In 2010,2014, we repurchased 0.1shares of AAM common stock for $0.3 million; in 2013, we repurchased shares of AAM common stock for $0.4 million; and in 2012, we repurchased 0.5 million shares of AAM common stock for $1.3$5.9 million, each to satisfy employee tax withholding obligations due upon the vesting of our restricted stock grants.

Exercise of employee stock options We received $4.6$1.2 million in 20112014, $1.1 million in 2013, and $0.1 million in 2012 related to the exercise of employee stock options.

29



Off-balance sheet arrangements Our off-balance sheet financing relates principally to operating leases for machinery and equipment, commercial office and production facilities, vehicles and other assets. We lease certain machinery and equipment under operating leases with various expiration dates.  In 2013 and 2012, we entered into various sale-leaseback transactions for $24.1 million and $12.1 million, respectively, for machinery and equipment. Pursuant to these operating leases, we may have the option to purchase the underlying equipment on specified dates. As of December 31, 2011, we do not have any remainingRemaining lease repurchase options.options are $17.9 million through 2017.

Contractual obligations The following table summarizes payments due on our contractual obligations as of December 31, 20112014:
Payments due by periodPayments due by period
Total   <1yr      1-3 yrs     3-5 yrs     >5 yrsTotal   <1yr      1-3 yrs     3-5 yrs     >5 yrs
(in millions)(in millions)
Long-term debt$1,174.0
 $41.3
 $253.7
 $
 $879.0
Current and long-term debt$1,531.4
 $34.8
 $35.3
 $511.3
 $950.0
Interest obligations516.5
 95.1
 179.7
 159.0
 82.7
591.5
 97.0
 190.0
 169.2
 135.3
Capital lease obligations6.2
 0.5
 0.7
 0.9
 4.1
5.0
 0.4
 0.9
 1.3
 2.4
Operating leases (1)
16.2
 5.2
 7.5
 3.4
 0.1
75.0
 19.9
 33.6
 11.4
 10.1
Purchase obligations (2)
127.5
 114.7
 12.8
 
 
109.8
 98.8
 11.0
 
 
Other long-term liabilities (3)
598.0
 52.9
 125.6
 118.8
 300.7
631.3
 55.5
 127.7
 128.7
 319.4
Total$2,438.4
 $309.7
 $580.0
 $282.1
 $1,266.6
$2,944.0
 $306.4
 $398.5
 $821.9
 $1,417.2

(1)Operating leases include all lease payments through the end of the contractual lease terms, which includes elections for repurchase options and excludes any non-exercised purchase options. These commitments include machinery and equipment, commercial office and production facilities, vehicles and other assets.


29




(2)Purchase obligations represent our obligated purchase commitments for capital expenditures and related project expense.

(3)Other long-term liabilities represent our estimated pension and other postretirement benefit obligations, net of GM cost sharing, that were actuarially determined through 2021,2024, lease payments due to our continuing involvement with a building we sold during 2014, as well as our unrecognized income tax benefits.


30


CYCLICALITY AND SEASONALITY

Our operations are cyclical because they are directly related to worldwide automotive production, which is itself cyclical and dependent on general economic conditions and other factors. Our business is also moderately seasonal as our major OEM customers historically have an extended shutdown of operations (typically 1-2 weeks) in conjunction with their model year changeover and an approximate one-week shutdown in December. Accordingly, our quarterly results may reflect these trends.

LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

We are involved in various legal proceedings incidental to our business. Although the outcome of these matters cannot be predicted with certainty, we do not believe that any of these matters, individually or in the aggregate, will have a material effect on our financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.

We are subject to various federal, state, local and foreign environmental and occupational safety and health laws, regulations and ordinances, including those regulating air emissions, water discharge, waste management and environmental cleanup. We closely monitor our environmental conditions to ensure that we are in compliance with applicable laws, regulations and ordinances. We have made, and will continue to make, capital and other expenditures (including recurring administrative costs) to comply with environmental requirements, including recurring administrative costs. Such expenditures were not significant in 20112014, 20102013 and 20092012.

EFFECT OF NEW ACCOUNTING STANDARDS

In June 2011, the FASB issuedOn January 1, 2014, new accounting guidance on thebecame effective regarding financial statement presentation of comprehensive income.an unrecognized tax benefit when a net operating loss (NOL) carryforward, a similar tax loss, or a tax credit carryforward exists. The new guidance allows an entityrequires entities to present componentsan unrecognized tax benefit, or a portion of net income and other comprehensive incomean unrecognized tax benefit, in the financial statements as a reduction to a deferred tax asset for an NOL carryforward, a similar tax loss, or a tax credit carryforward, except when one continuous statement, referredis not available as of the reporting date or the entity does not intend to use the deferred tax asset for this purpose. This guidance does not affect the tabular reconciliation of the total amounts of unrecognized tax benefits, as the statementtabular reconciliation presents the gross amount of comprehensive income, or in two separate, but consecutive statements.unrecognized tax benefits. The guidance eliminates the current option to report other comprehensive income and its components in the statement of changes in equity. While the new guidance changes the presentation of comprehensive income, there are no changes to the components that are recognized in net income or other comprehensive income under current accounting guidance. This new guidance is effective for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2011. Other than the change in presentation, the adoption of this new guidance will not have anhas had no impact on our consolidated financial statements.

In September 2011, the FASB issuedMay 2014, new accounting guidance was issued that outlines a single comprehensive model for entities to use in accounting for revenue arising from contracts with customers and supersedes most current revenue recognition guidance, including industry-specific guidance. The guidance is based on testing goodwillthe principle that an entity should recognize revenue to depict the transfer of goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for impairment. This newthose goods or services.  The guidance will allow usalso requires additional disclosure about the nature, amount, timing and uncertainty of revenue and cash flows arising from customer contracts, including significant judgments and changes in judgments and assets recognized from costs incurred to fulfill a contract.  Entities have the option to first assess qualitative factors to determine whether it is necessary to performof using either a full retrospective or a modified retrospective approach for the two-step quantitative goodwill impairment test. Under these amendments, we would not be required to calculateadoption of the fair value of a reporting unit unless we determine, based on a qualitative assessment, that it is more likely than not that its fair value is less than its carrying amount. The amendments include a number of events and circumstances to consider in conducting the qualitative assessment.new standard.  This new guidance isbecomes effective for interimAAM at the beginning of our 2017 fiscal year and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2011 with early adoption is not permitted.  We have not adoptedare currently assessing the impact that this guidance as of December 31, 2011 and do not believe the adoptionstandard will have a significant effect on our goodwill impairment assessments in the future.consolidated financial statements.


30





CRITICAL ACCOUNTING ESTIMATES

In order to prepare consolidated financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (GAAP), we are required to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts and disclosures in our consolidated financial statements. These estimates are subject to an inherent degree of uncertainty and actual results could differ from our estimates.
 
Other items in our consolidated financial statements require estimation. In our judgment, they are not as critical as those disclosed below. We have discussed and reviewed our critical accounting estimates disclosure with the Audit Committee of our Board of Directors.

31



PENSION AND OTHER POSTRETIREMENT BENEFITS In calculating our assets, liabilities and expenses related to pension and OPEB, key assumptions include the discount rate, expected long-term rates of return on plan assets and rates of increase in health care costs.

The discount rates used in the valuation of our U.S. pension and OPEB obligations were based on an actuarial review of a hypothetical portfolio of long-term, high quality corporate bonds matched against the expected payment stream for each of our plans. In 20112014, the weighted average discount rates determined on that basis were 4.10%for both the valuation of our pension benefit obligations and 4.15% for the valuation of our OPEB obligations were 5.10%.obligations. The discount rate used in the valuation of our U.K. pension obligation was based on a review of long-term bonds, including published indices in the applicable market. In 20112014, the discount rate determined on that basis was 4.65%3.70%. The expected long-term rates of return on our plan assets were 8.00%7.50% for our U.S. plans and 4.60%5.00% for our U.K. plan in 20112014. We developed these rates of return assumptions based on future capital market expectations for the asset classes represented within our portfolio and a review of long-term historical returns. The asset allocation for our plans was developed in consideration of the demographics of the plan participants and expected payment stream of the liability. Our investment policy allocates approximately 50%30-65% of the U.S. plans' assets to equity securities, depending on the plan, with the remainder invested in fixed income securities, hedge fund investments and cash. The rates of increase in health care costs are based on current market conditions, inflationary expectations and historical information.

All of our assumptions were developed in consultation with our actuarial service providers. While we believe that we have selected reasonable assumptions for the valuation of our pension and OPEB obligations at year-end 20112014, actual trends could result in materially different valuations.

The effect on our pension plans of a 0.5% decrease in both the discount rate and expected return on assets is shown below as of December 31, 20112014, our valuation date.

  Expected  Expected
Discount Return onDiscount Return on
Rate AssetsRate Assets
(in millions)(in millions)
Decline in funded status$48.7
 N/A
$51.0
 N/A
Increase in 2011 expense$1.0
 $2.2
Increase in 2014 expense$1.4
 $3.3

No changes in benefit levels and no changesor in the amortization of gains or losses have been assumed. The increase in 2014 expense excludes the impact of the settlement charge.

For 20122015, we assumed a weighted average annual increase in the per-capita cost of covered health care benefits of 8.5%7.0% for OPEB. The rate is assumed to decrease gradually to 5.0% by 20192023 and remain at that level thereafter. A 0.5% decrease in the discount rate for our OPEB would have decreased total expense in 20112014 and increased the postretirement obligation, net of GM cost sharing, at December 31, 20112014 by $0.3$0.7 million and $19.6$25.8 million, respectively. A 1.0% increase in the assumed health care trend rate would have increased total service and interest cost in 20112014 and the postretirement obligation, net of GM cost sharing, at December 31, 20112014 by $1.71.6 million and $35.941.3 million, respectively.


31




As part of our 2009 SettlementAAM and Commercial Agreement, GM confirmed its obligation to share in the cost of OPEB for eligible retirees proportionally based on the length of service an employee had with AAM and GM. We estimate the future cost sharing payments and present it as an asset on our Consolidated Balance Sheet. As of December 31, 20112014, we estimated $270.6287.8 million in future GM cost sharing. If, in the future, GM waswere unable to fulfill this financial obligation, our OPEB expensesobligations may be different than our current estimates.

32



VALUATION OF DEFERRED TAX ASSETS AND OTHER TAX LIABILITIES Because we operate in many different geographic locations, including several foreign, state and local tax jurisdictions, the evaluation of our ability to use all recognized deferred tax assets is complex.

We are required to estimate whether recoverability of our deferred tax assets is more"more likely than not," based on forecasts of taxable income in the related tax jurisdictions. In these estimates, we use historical results, projected future operating results based upon approved business plans, eligible carryforward periods, tax planning opportunities and other relevant considerations. This includes the consideration of tax law changes, prior profitability performance and the uncertainty of future projected profitability.

Under applicable GAAP, a sustained period of profitability in our operations is required before we would change our judgment regarding the need for a valuation allowance against our net deferred tax assets.  In 2012, our business returned to a position of cumulative profitability on a pre-tax basis, considering our operating results for the three years ended December 31, 2012. We concluded that this record of cumulative profitability in recent years, in addition to the restructuring of our U.S. operations and our long range forecast showing continued profitability, had provided sufficient positive evidence that our net U.S. federal tax benefits more likely than not will be realized. Accordingly, in the fourth quarter of 2012, we released the valuation allowance against our net federal deferred assets for entities in the U.S., resulting in a $337.5 million benefit in our 2012 provision for income taxes.
As of December 31, 20112014, we have a valuation allowance of approximately , $156.9 million2010 related to net deferred tax assets in several foreign jurisdictions and U.S. state and local jurisdictions. As of December 31, 2013 and 20092012, we hadour valuation allowances ofallowance was $426.9 million, $560.9163.7 million and $559.7166.1 million, respectively. These valuation allowances mainly related to the full valuation allowances on our U.S. net deferred tax assets.

If, in the future, we generate taxable income on a sustained basis in theforeign and U.S. or in foreignstate jurisdictions for which we have recorded valuation allowances, our current estimate of the recoverability of our deferred tax assets could change and result in the future reversal of some or all of the valuation allowance. While we believe we have made appropriate valuations of our deferred tax assets, unforeseen changes in tax legislation, regulatory activities, audit results, operating results, financing strategies, organization structure and other related matters may result in material changes in our deferred tax asset valuation allowances or our tax liabilities.

Under applicable GAAP, a sustained period of profitability in our operations is required before we would change our judgment regarding the need for a full valuation allowance against our net deferred tax assets.  Accordingly, although we were profitable on a consolidated basis in the second half of 2009 and the full year 2010 and 2011, we continue toWe record a full valuation allowance against the net deferred tax assets in the U.S. and certain foreign jurisdictions.  Although the weight of negative evidence related to cumulative losses is decreasing, we believe that this objectively-measured negative evidence outweighs the subjectively-determined positive evidence (primarily forecasts of future income) and, as such, we have not changed our judgment regarding the need for a full valuation allowance in 2011.

Continued improvement in our operating results, however, could lead to reversal of substantially all of our valuation allowance as early as the second half of 2012.  Until such time, consumption of tax attributes to offset profits will reduce the overall level of deferred tax assets subject to valuation allowance.

For each reporting period until the valuation allowance is released, we expect to have low effective tax rates as we continue to record tax expense only for those locations in which we do not have a valuation allowance in place.  We expect to experience higher effective tax rates after the valuation allowance is reversed.

In the quarter in which the valuation allowance is released, we would record a significant tax benefit reflecting the release, which would result in a negative effective tax rate and have a significant favorable impact on earnings per share from net income attributable to AAM.  

To the extent our uncertain tax positions do noton the basis of a two-step process whereby: (1) we determine whether it is "more likely than not" that the tax positions will be sustained based on the technical merits of the position: and (2) for those positions that meet the “more"more likely than not”not" recognition threshold, we have derecognized such positions. Torecognize the extent ourlargest amount of tax benefit that is greater than 50% likely to be realized upon ultimate settlement with the related tax authority. We record interest and penalties on uncertain tax positions meet the “more likely than not” threshold, we have measured and recorded the highest probable benefit, and have established appropriate reserves for benefits that exceed the amount likely to be defended upon examination.in income tax expense (benefit).

As of December 31, 20112014, 20102013 and 20092012, we have recorded a liability for unrecognized income tax benefits and related interest and penalties of $33.259.5 million, $69.025.8 million and $55.930.9 million, respectively. AsBased on the status of December 31, 2011the IRS audits and audits outside the U.S., we have recorded deferred tax assetsand the protocol of $6.9 million that offset the impact of these liabilities for unrecognized income tax benefits. Our U.S. federal and certain state income tax returns and certain non-U.S. income tax returns are currently under various stages of auditfinalizing audits by the relevant tax authorities.authorities, it is not possible to estimate the impact of changes, if any, to previously recorded uncertain tax positions. Although it is not possible to predict the timing of the conclusion of all ongoing audits with certainty, we anticipate that the current U.S. IRS audit will be completed during 2015. It is also possible that the current 2007 and 2008 audits with the Mexican tax authorities will be completed before the end of 2016. Although it is difficult to estimate with certainty the amount of an audit settlement for the years currently under audit, we do not expect any settlements will be materially different from what we have recorded in unrecognized tax benefits. We will continue to monitor the progress and conclusions of all ongoing audits and will adjust our estimated liability as necessary.

3332





PRODUCT WARRANTY We record a liability againstand related charge to cost of goods sold for estimated warranty obligations at the dates our products are sold or when specific warranty issues are identified. Liabilities for product recalls are recorded at the time the company's obligation is probable and can be reasonably estimated. Product warranties not expected to be paid within one year are recorded as a non-current liability on our Consolidated Balance Sheet. Our estimated warranty obligations for products sold are based on significant management estimates, with input from our warranty, sales, engineering, quality and legal departments. For products and customers with actual warranty payment experience, we will estimate warranty costs principally based on past claims history. For certain products and customers, actual warranty payment experience does not exist or is not mature. In these cases, we estimate our costs based on our analysis of the contractual arrangements with individualour customers, existing customercustomers' warranty programs, sales historyprogram terms and internal and external warranty data, includingwhich includes a determination of our involvement in the matter giving rise to theresponsibility for potential warranty issueissues or claimclaims and estimates of repair costs. These estimates are re-evaluated on an ongoing basis.

As part of the 2009 Settlement and Commercial Agreement, we agreed to expanded warranty cost sharing with GM starting on January 1, 2011.

We actively study trends of our warranty claims and take action to improve product quality and minimize warranty claims. WarrantyWe continuously evaluate these estimates and our customers' administration of their warranty programs. We closely monitor actual warranty claim data and adjust the liability, as necessary, on a quarterly basis.

In addition to our ordinary warranty provisions with our customers, we are also liable for product recalls and field actions, which are recorded at the time our obligation is probable and can be reasonably estimated. For warranty obligations of this nature, we bear the full responsibility of these costs. We recorded $2.3 million and $9.9 million of expense in 2013 and 2012, respectively, related to a specific field action with our largest customer.

Our warranty accrual, including both our ordinary warranty and specific field action accruals, are evaluated and adjustedwas $12.4 million as appropriate based on occurrences giving rise to potential warranty exposure and associated experience. As of December 31, 2011,2014 and $14.3 million as of December 31, 2013. In 2013, we made warranty payments of $12.3 million, of which $11.3 million related to the field action. During 2014 and 2013, we also made adjustments to our warranty accrual was $13.4 million.to reflect revised estimates regarding our projected future warranty obligations. Actual experience could differ from the amounts estimated requiring adjustments to these liabilities in future periods. While we have not experienced any significant differences between these estimates and our actual costs, itIt is possible that changes in our assumptions or future warranty issues could materially affect our financial position and results of operations.

ENVIRONMENTAL OBLIGATIONSGOODWILL Due toWe record goodwill when the naturepurchase price of our operations, we have legal obligations to perform asset retirement activities related to federal, state, localacquired businesses exceeds the value of their identifiable net tangible and foreign environmental requirements. The process of estimating environmental liabilities is complexintangible assets acquired. We periodically evaluate goodwill for impairment in accordance with the accounting guidance for goodwill and significant uncertainty exists related to the timing and method of the settlement of these obligations.  Therefore, these liabilitiesother indefinite-lived intangibles that are not reasonably estimable until a triggering event occurs that allows us to estimate a range and possibilities of potential settlement dates, and the potential methods of settlement.
As a result of the plant closures, idling and consolidation of facilities in 2011, 2010 and 2009, the methods and timing of certain asset retirement obligations related to these facilities became reasonably estimable.  Based on management's best estimate of the costs, methods and timing of the settlement of these obligations, we recorded a charge of $0.1 million in 2011 and 2010 and $1.0 million in 2009. As of December 31, 2011, the accrual for this liability was $0.6 million. In the future, we will update our estimated costs and potential settlement dates and methods and their associated probabilities based on current information.  Any update may change our best estimate and could result in a material adjustment to this liability.

GOODWILL amortized. We review our goodwill for impairment annually during the fourth quarter. In addition, we review goodwill for impairment whenever adverse events or changes in circumstances indicate a possible impairment.  This review utilizes a two-step impairment test required by the accounting guidance covering goodwill and other indefinite-lived intangibles.which is performed at a consolidated level, as AAM has a single reporting unit. The first step involves a comparison of the fair value of athe reporting unit with its carrying value.amount, including goodwill.  If the fair value of the reporting unit exceeds its carrying amount, goodwill of the reporting unit is not considered impaired and thus the second step of the impairment test is unnecessary. If the carrying valueamount of the reporting unit exceeds its fair value, the second step of the process involves a measurement and comparison of the fair value of goodwill with its carrying value.amount.  If the carrying valueamount of the reporting unit's goodwill exceeds the fair value of that goodwill, an impairment loss is recognized in an amount equal to the excess.  

The determination of our reporting units,unit and impairment indicators and the fair value of those reporting units and corresponding goodwill require us to make significant judgments and estimates, includingjudgments. In order to approximate the extent and timingfair value of future cash flows. As partour reporting unit for purposes of testing recoverability, we use the determinationtotal market capitalization of future cash flows, we needAAM, a market approach, which is then compared to make assumptionsthe total carrying amount of AAM. Under the market approach, the fair value is based on future general economic conditions, business projections, growth rates and discount rates. These assumptions require significant judgment and are subject to a considerable degree of uncertainty. We believe that the assumptions and estimates in our review of goodwill for impairment are reasonable. However, different assumptions could materially effect our conclusions on this matter.observed market prices. We performed our annual analysisimpairment test in the fourth quarter and determined there was no impairment to goodwill in 2011.2014.








3433





IMPAIRMENT OF LONG-LIVED ASSETS Long-lived assets, excluding goodwill and other indefinite-lived intangible assets, to be held and used are reviewed for impairment whenever adverse events or changes in circumstances indicate a possible impairment. Recoverability of each “held for use” asset group affected by impairment indicators is determined by comparing the forecasted undiscounted cash flows of the operations to which the assets relate to their carrying amount.  If the carrying amount of an asset group exceeds the undiscounted cash flows and is therefore nonrecoverable, the assets in this group are written down to their estimated fair value.  We estimate fair value based on market prices, when available, or on a discounted cash flow analysis.  Long-lived assets held for sale are recorded at the lower of their carrying amount or fair value less cost to sell. Significant judgments and estimates used by management when evaluating long-lived assets for impairment include:
 
An assessment as to whether an adverse event or circumstance has triggered the need for an impairment review;  
Determination of asset groups, the primary asset within each group, and the primary asset's average estimated useful life;
Undiscounted future cash flows generated by the assets; and
Determination of fair value when an impairment is deemed to exist, which may require assumptions related to future general economic conditions, future expected production volumes, product pricing and cost estimates, working capital and capital investment requirements, discount rates and estimated liquidation values.
 
In 2011,2012, we recorded asset impairment charges of $8.1$5.8 million as a resultrelated to previously purchased lease buyouts of the announced closure of CKMF. In 2010,equipment that we recorded asset impairment charges of $8.4 million as a result of the announced closure ofno longer expect to use in our Salem Manufacturing Facility. We also classified certain administrative and engineering facilities located in Detroit, Michigan as held-for-sale and recorded a loss of $5.1 million to write these assets down to their estimated fair value using available market data in 2010. We recorded asset impairment charges of $147.8 million in 2009 associated with the permanent idling of certain assets and the writedown of the carrying value of certain assets that were “held for use” to their estimated fair value.operations.

ESTIMATED USEFUL LIVES FOR DEPRECIATION   At December 31, 20112014, approximately 75%80% of our capitalized investment in property, plant and equipment was related to productive machinery and equipment used in support of our manufacturing operations.  The selection of appropriate useful life estimates for such machinery and equipment is a critical element of our ability to properly match the cost of such assets with the operating profits and cash flow generated by their use.  We currently depreciate productive machinery and equipment on the straight-line method using composite useful life estimates up to 12 years.

While we believe that the useful life estimates currently being used for depreciation purposes reasonably approximate the period of time we will use such assets in our operations, unforeseen changes in product design and technology standards or cost, quality and delivery requirements may result in actual useful lives that differ materially from the current estimates.

3534




Forward-Looking Statements

In this MD&A and elsewhere in this Annual Report, we make certain statements concerning our expectations, beliefs, plans, objectives, goals, strategies, and future events or performance. Such statements are “forward-looking” statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 and relate to trends and events that may affect our future financial position and operating results. The terms such as “will,” “may,” “could,” “would,” “plan,” “believe,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “intend,” “project”“project,” "target," and similar words or expressions, as well as statements in future tense, are intended to identify forward-looking statements.

Forward-looking statements should not be read as a guarantee of future performance or results, and will not necessarily be accurate indications of the times at, or by, which such performance or results will be achieved. Forward-looking statements are based on information available at the time those statements are made and/or management'smanagement’s good faith belief as of that time with respect to future events and are subject to risks and may differ materially from those expressed in or suggested by the forward-looking statements. Important factors that could cause such differences include, but are not limited to:

global economic conditions, including the impact of the current sovereign debt crisis in the Euro-zone; 
reduced purchases of our products by GM,General Motors Company (GM), FCA US LLC, formerly known as Chrysler Group LLC (Chrysler), or other customers;
reduced demand for our customers' products (particularly light trucks and SUVssport utility vehicles (SUVs) produced by GM and Chrysler);
our ability to realize the expected revenues from ourdevelop and produce new business backlog;products that reflect market demand;
lower-than-anticipated market acceptance of new or existing products;
our ability or our customers'to attract new customers and suppliers'programs for new products;
our ability to successfully launch new product programs on a timely basis;respond to changes in technology, increased competition or pricing pressures;
our ability to achieve the level of cost reductions required to sustain global cost competitiveness;
our ability to attract new customers and programs for new products;
supply shortages or price increases in raw materials, utilities or other operating supplies for us or our customers as a result of natural disasters or otherwise;
our ability to respondsuccessfully implement upgrades to our enterprise resource planning systems;
global economic conditions;
risks inherent in our international operations (including adverse changes in technology, increased competitionpolitical stability, taxes and other law changes, potential disruptions of production and supply, and currency rate fluctuations);
liabilities arising from warranty claims, product recall or pricing pressures;
price volatility in,field actions, product liability and legal proceedings to which we are or reduced availabilitymay become a party, or the impact of fuel;product recall or field actions on our customers;
our ability to maintain satisfactory labor relations and avoid work stoppages;
our suppliers', our customers' and their suppliers' ability to maintain satisfactory labor relations and avoid work stoppages;
risks inherentour ability or our customers' and suppliers' ability to successfully launch new product programs on a timely basis;
our ability to realize the expected revenues from our new and incremental business backlog;
negative or unexpected tax consequences;
price volatility in, or reduced availability of, fuel;
our international operations (including adverse changes in political stability, taxesability to consummate and other law changes, potential disruption of productionintegrate acquisitions and supply,joint ventures;
our ability to attract and currency rate fluctuations);retain key associates;
liabilities arising from warranty claims, product recall, product liabilityour ability to protect our intellectual property and legal proceedings to which we are or may become a party;successfully defend against assertions made against us;
availability of financing for working capital, capital expenditures, R&Dresearch and development (R&D) or other general corporate purposes including acquisitions, as well as our ability to comply with financial covenants;
our customers' and suppliers' availability of financing for working capital, capital expenditures, R&D or other general corporate purposes;
changes in liabilities arising from pension and other postretirement benefit obligations;
risks of noncompliance with environmental laws and regulations or risks of environmental issues that could result in unforeseen costs at our ability to develop and produce new products that reflect market demand;
lower-than-anticipated market acceptance of new or existing products;
our ability to consummate and integrate acquisitions and joint ventures;facilities;
adverse changes in laws, government regulations or market conditions affecting our products or our customers' products (such as the Corporate Average Fuel Economy (“CAFE”)(CAFE) regulations);
changes in liabilities arising from pension and other postretirement benefit obligations;
risks of noncompliance with environmental regulations or risks of environmental issues that could result in unforeseen costs at our facilities;
our ability or our customers' and suppliers' ability to attractcomply with the Dodd-Frank Act and retain key associates;other regulatory requirements and the potential costs of such compliance; and
other unanticipated events and conditions that may hinder our ability to compete.

It is not possible to foresee or identify all such factors and we make no commitment to update any forward-looking statement or to disclose any facts, events or circumstances after the date hereof that may affect the accuracy of any forward-looking statement.


3635




Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk

MARKET RISK

Our business and financial results are affected by fluctuations in world financial markets, including interest rates and currency exchange rates. Our hedging policy has been developed to manage these risks to an acceptable level based on management's judgment of the appropriate trade-off between risk, opportunity and cost. We do not hold financial instruments for trading or speculative purposes.

CURRENCY EXCHANGE RISK From time to time, we use foreign currency forward contracts to reduce the effects of fluctuations in exchange rates, primarily relating to the Mexican Peso, Euro, Swedish Krona, Polish Zloty and Pound Sterling and Brazilian Real.Sterling. At December 31, 2011,2014, we had currency forward contracts relating to the Mexican Peso with a notional amount of $68.699.3 million outstanding.  The potential decrease in fair value of foreign exchange contracts, assuming a 10% adverse change in the foreign currency exchange rates, would be approximately $6.29.0 million and $6.1 million at December 31, 20112014. and December 31, 2013, respectively.

Future business operations and opportunities, including the expansion of our business outside North America, may further increase the risk that cash flows resulting from these activities may be adversely affected by changes in currency exchange rates. If and when appropriate, we intend to manage these risks by utilizing local currency funding of these expansions and various types of foreign exchange contracts.

INTEREST RATE RISK We are exposed to variable interest rates on certain credit facilities. From time to time, we have used interest rate hedging to reduce the effects of fluctuations in market interest rates. As of December 31, 20112014, there are no interest rate swaps in place. The pre-tax earnings and cash flow impact of a one-percentage-point increase in interest rates (approximately 13%16% of our weighted-average interest rate at December 31, 20112014) on our long-term debt outstanding at December 31, 20112014 and December 31, 2013 would be approximately $0.41.8 million and $2.0 million, respectively, on an annualized basis.


3736



AMERICAN AXLE & MANUFACTURING HOLDINGS, INC.

Item 8.Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

Consolidated Statements of OperationsIncome
Year Ended December 31,
2011 2010 20092014 2013 2012
(in millions, except per share data)(in millions, except per share data)
          
Net sales$2,585.0
 $2,283.0
 $1,521.6
$3,696.0
 $3,207.3
 $2,930.9
          
Cost of goods sold2,129.9
 1,881.3
 1,552.7
3,173.2
 2,728.6
 2,531.2
          
Gross profit (loss)455.1
 401.7
 (31.1)
Gross profit522.8
 478.7
 399.7
          
Selling, general and administrative expenses231.7
 197.6
 172.7
255.2
 238.4
 243.3
          
Operating income (loss)223.4
 204.1
 (203.8)
Operating income267.6
 240.3
 156.4
          
Interest expense(83.9) (89.0) (84.5)(99.9) (115.9) (101.6)
          
Investment income1.2
 3.8
 2.0
2.1
 0.6
 0.6
          
Other income (expense)          
Debt refinancing and redemption costs(3.1) 
 (7.7)
 (36.8) (19.8)
Other, net0.5
 (0.1) (3.1)6.9
 (1.9) (4.1)
          
Income (loss) before income taxes138.1
 118.8
 (297.1)
Income before income taxes176.7
 86.3
 31.5
          
Income tax expense (benefit)1.0
 4.3
 (43.8)33.7
 (8.2) (335.2)
          
Net income (loss)$137.1
 $114.5
 $(253.3)
Net income$143.0
 $94.5
 $366.7
          
Net loss attributable to noncontrolling interests5.7
 0.9
 0.2

 
 1.0
          
Net income (loss) attributable to AAM$142.8
 $115.4
 $(253.1)
Net income attributable to AAM$143.0
 $94.5
 $367.7
          
Basic earnings (loss) per share$1.91
 $1.61
 $(4.81)
Basic earnings per share$1.85
 $1.23
 $4.88
          
Diluted earnings (loss) per share$1.89
 $1.55
 $(4.81)
Diluted earnings per share$1.85
 $1.23
 $4.87
          

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements


37



AMERICAN AXLE & MANUFACTURING HOLDINGS, INC.

Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income
Year Ended December 31,

 2014 2013 2012
 (in millions)
Net income$143.0
 $94.5
 $366.7
      
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax     
Defined benefit plans, net of $23.2 million, $(41.3) million and $32.3 million of tax in 2014, 2013 and 2012, respectively(42.7) 76.6
 (58.9)
     Foreign currency translation adjustments(30.3) (26.2) (9.4)
     Change in derivatives(7.7) (2.0) 7.8
Other comprehensive income (loss)(80.7) 48.4
 (60.5)
      
Comprehensive income62.3
 142.9
 306.2
      
     Net loss attributable to noncontrolling interests
 
 1.0
Foreign currency translation adjustments attributable to noncontrolling interests
 
 0.3
      
Comprehensive income attributable to AAM$62.3
 $142.9
 $306.9
      

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements


38



AMERICAN AXLE & MANUFACTURING HOLDINGS, INC.

Consolidated Balance Sheets
December 31,
2011 20102014 2013
Assets(in millions, except per share data)(in millions, except per share data)
Current assets      
Cash and cash equivalents$169.2
 $244.6
$249.2
 $154.0
Accounts receivable, net333.3
 146.6
532.7
 458.5
Inventories, net177.2
 130.3
248.8
 261.8
Deferred income taxes11.3
 8.0
40.2
 34.9
Prepaid expenses and other72.1
 72.6
68.6
 87.1
Total current assets763.1
 602.1
1,139.5
 996.3
      
Property, plant and equipment, net971.2
 936.3
1,061.1
 1,058.5
Deferred income taxes20.1
 38.6
368.8
 341.8
Goodwill155.9
 155.8
155.0
 156.4
GM postretirement cost sharing asset260.2
 244.4
274.5
 242.0
Other assets and deferred charges158.2
 137.5
260.3
 232.5
Total assets$2,328.7
 $2,114.7
$3,259.2
 $3,027.5
      
Liabilities and Stockholders' Deficit   
Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity   
Current liabilities      
Current portion of long-term debt$13.0
 $
Accounts payable$337.1
 $283.6
444.3
 437.4
Accrued compensation and benefits110.6
 115.1
109.1
 110.1
Deferred revenue32.9
 79.9
22.1
 17.0
Deferred income taxes9.9
 8.9
0.1
 0.1
Other accrued expenses85.6
 81.6
98.6
 94.1
Total current liabilities576.1
 569.1
687.2
 658.7
      
Long-term debt1,180.2
 1,010.0
1,523.4
 1,559.1
Deferred income taxes7.7
 6.6
9.1
 9.8
Deferred revenue88.2
 116.0
94.2
 76.4
Postretirement benefits and other long-term liabilities896.1
 881.1
831.9
 683.0
Total liabilities2,748.3
 2,582.8
3,145.8
 2,987.0
      
Stockholders' deficit   
Stockholders' equity   
Series A junior participating preferred stock, par value $0.01 per share;      
0.1 million shares authorized; no shares outstanding in 2011 or 2010
 
0.1 million shares authorized; no shares outstanding in 2014 or 2013
 
Preferred stock, par value $0.01 per share; 10.0 million shares      
authorized; no shares outstanding in 2011 or 2010
 
authorized; no shares outstanding in 2014 or 2013
 
Common stock, par value $0.01 per share; 150.0 million shares authorized;      
79.3 million and 74.3 million shares issued and outstanding in 2011 and 2010, respectively0.8
 0.8
81.9 million and 81.6 million shares issued as of December 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively0.8
 0.8
Series common stock, par value $0.01 per share; 40.0 million      
shares authorized; no shares outstanding in 2011 or 2010
 
shares authorized; no shares outstanding in 2014 or 2013
 
Paid-in capital597.2
 588.1
623.7
 612.8
Accumulated deficit(643.5) (786.3)(31.4) (174.4)
Treasury stock at cost, 5.5 million shares in 2011 and 2010(176.2) (176.1)
Treasury stock at cost, 6.1 million shares in 2014 and 6.0 million shares in 2013(182.8) (182.5)
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax      
Defined benefit plans(215.6) (152.1)(240.6) (197.9)
Foreign currency translation adjustments17.3
 44.8
(48.9) (18.6)
Unrecognized gain (loss) on derivatives(5.5) 1.3
(7.4) 0.3
Total AAM stockholders' deficit(425.5) (479.5)
Total AAM stockholders' equity113.4
 40.5
Noncontrolling interests in subsidiaries5.9
 11.4

 
Total stockholders' deficit(419.6) (468.1)
Total liabilities and stockholders' deficit$2,328.7
 $2,114.7
Total stockholders' equity113.4
 40.5
Total liabilities and stockholders' equity$3,259.2
 $3,027.5
   

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements

39



AMERICAN AXLE & MANUFACTURING HOLDINGS, INC.

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
Year Ended December 31,
2011 2010 20092014 2013 2012
  (in millions)  (in millions)
Operating Activities          
Net income (loss)$137.1
 $114.5
 $(253.3)
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities     
Net income$143.0
 $94.5
 $366.7
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities     
Asset impairments and related indirect inventory obsolescence8.7
 8.7
 151.7

 
 5.8
Depreciation and amortization139.4
 131.6
 134.7
199.9
 177.0
 152.2
Deferred income taxes17.2
 (8.0) (18.9)(9.2) (18.7) (343.8)
Stock-based compensation4.5
 9.4
 13.6
9.7
 10.8
 2.4
Pensions and other postretirement benefits, net of contributions(33.3) (28.8) (83.4)31.8
 6.5
 (208.4)
(Gain) loss on retirement of equipment and held-for-sale assets, net(6.9) 2.9
 0.7
Gain on disposal of property, plant and equipment, net(2.6) (3.5) (1.9)
Debt refinancing and redemption costs1.8
 
 7.7

 9.2
 1.5
Changes in operating assets and liabilities          
Accounts receivable(189.9) (14.8) 118.9
(78.3) (0.3) (130.6)
Inventories(50.2) (38.9) 19.6
10.9
 (42.5) (49.9)
Accounts payable and accrued expenses37.1
 112.0
 (50.7)13.7
 66.3
 60.9
Deferred revenue(74.7) (70.1) 20.9
24.5
 (5.6) (21.6)
Other assets and liabilities(47.1) 21.8
 (45.6)(25.0) (70.7) (8.8)
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities(56.3) 240.3
 15.9
318.4
 223.0
 (175.5)
          
Investing activities          
Purchases of property, plant and equipment(163.1) (108.3) (137.7)(206.5) (251.9) (207.6)
Proceeds from sale of property, plant and equipment8.9
 4.9
 1.7
9.1
 9.1
 10.1
Purchase buyouts of leased equipment(13.4) (7.8) 
Acquisition, net(16.5) (2.2) (10.2)
Redemption of short-term investments
 6.4
 71.6
Proceeds from sale-leaseback of equipment
 24.1
 12.1
Proceeds from government grants2.1
 
 
Net cash used in investing activities(184.1) (107.0) (74.6)(195.3) (218.7) (185.4)
          
Financing activities          
Net short-term borrowings (repayments) under credit facilities2.6
 (60.0) (163.1)
 (29.9) 10.4
Proceeds from issuance of long-term debt227.0
 6.2
 854.8
Payment of Term Loan
 
 (250.0)
Payments of other long-term debt and capital lease obligations(56.0) (8.1) (516.8)
Proceeds from issuance of long-term debt and other5.0
 786.7
 562.6
Payments of other long-term debt, capital lease obligations and other(27.0) (652.0) (299.1)
Debt issuance costs(10.9) (2.2) (32.9)(0.3) (16.7) (10.6)
Purchase of noncontrolling interest
 (2.1) 

 
 (4.0)
Proceeds from issuance of common stock, net
 
 109.7
Proceeds from issuance of warrants to GM
 
 30.3
Employee stock option exercises, including tax benefit4.6
 1.1
 1.0
1.2
 1.1
 0.1
Purchase of treasury stock(0.1) (1.3) (0.9)(0.3) (0.4) (5.9)
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities167.2
 (66.4) 32.1
(21.4) 88.8
 253.5
          
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash(2.2) (0.4) 5.9
(6.5) (1.5) 0.6
          
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents(75.4) 66.5
 (20.7)95.2
 91.6
 (106.8)
          
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year244.6
 178.1
 198.8
154.0
 62.4
 169.2
          
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year$169.2
 $244.6
 $178.1
$249.2
 $154.0
 $62.4
          
Supplemental cash flow information          
Interest paid$73.1
 $61.6
 $80.0
$91.1
 $123.2
 $88.9
Income taxes paid (refunds received)$10.9
 $(43.1) $3.8
Income taxes paid, net$11.3
 $11.6
 $14.7
     

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements

40



AMERICAN AXLE & MANUFACTURING HOLDINGS, INC.

Consolidated Statement of Stockholders' DeficitEquity (Deficit)
      Accumulated Other   
 Common Stock   ComprehensiveComprehensiveNoncontrolling 
 SharesParPaid-inAccumulatedTreasuryIncome (Loss)Income (Loss)Interest inComprehensive
 OutstandingValueCapitalDeficitStockAttributable to AAMAttributable to AAMSubsidiariesIncome (Loss)
 (in millions)
          
Balance at January 1, 200951.7
$0.6
$426.7
$(648.6)$(173.9)$(40.5) $0.2
 
          
Net loss   (253.1)  $(253.1)$(0.2)$(253.3)
Change in derivatives, net     11.4
11.4
 11.4
Foreign currency translation, net     37.2
37.2
0.4
37.6
Defined benefit plans, net     (72.5)(72.5) (72.5)
Total comprehensive income (loss)      $(277.0)$0.2
$(276.8)
Proceeds from issuance of common stock, net16.1
0.2
109.5
      
Proceeds from issuance of warrants to GM  30.3
      
Change in noncontrolling interest ownership       (0.1) 
Exercise of stock options and vesting of restricted stock0.6
 1.0
      
Stock-based compensation  12.4
      
Purchase of treasury stock
   (0.9)    
Balance at December 31, 200968.4
$0.8
$579.9
$(901.7)$(174.8)$(64.4) $0.3
 
          
Net income (loss)   115.4
  $115.4
$(0.9)$114.5
Change in derivatives, net     1.3
1.3
 1.3
Foreign currency translation, net     7.4
7.4
(0.1)7.3
Defined benefit plans, net     (50.3)(50.3) (50.3)
Total comprehensive income (loss)      $73.8
$(1.0)$72.8
Issuance of noncontrolling interest in e-AAM       12.0
 
Acquisition of noncontrolling interest  (2.1)    0.1
 
Exercise of stock options and vesting of restricted stock0.5
 1.1
      
Stock-based compensation  9.2
      
Purchase of treasury stock(0.1)   (1.3)    
Balance at December 31, 201068.8
$0.8
$588.1
$(786.3)$(176.1)$(106.0) $11.4
 
          
Net income (loss)   142.8
  $142.8
$(5.7)$137.1
Change in derivatives, net     (6.8)(6.8) (6.8)
Foreign currency translation, net     (27.5)(27.5)0.2
(27.3)
Defined benefit plans, net     (63.5)(63.5) (63.5)
Total comprehensive income (loss)      $45.0
$(5.5)$39.5
Exercise of stock options and vesting of restricted stock1.7
 4.6
      
Stock-based compensation  4.5
      
Exercise of GM warrants3.3
        
Purchase of treasury stock
   (0.1)    
Balance at December 31, 201173.8
$0.8
$597.2
$(643.5)$(176.2)$(203.8) $5.9
 
          
      Accumulated Other 
      Comprehensive 
 Common Stock   Income (Loss)Noncontrolling
 SharesParPaid-inAccumulatedTreasuryAttributable toInterests in
 OutstandingValueCapitalDeficitStockAAMSubsidiaries
 (in millions)
        
Balance at January 1, 2012, as revised (see Note 1)73.8
$0.8
$597.2
$(636.6)$(176.2)$(203.8)$5.9
        
Net income   367.7
  (1.0)
Change in derivatives     7.8
 
Foreign currency translation     (9.7)0.3
Defined benefit plans, net     (58.9) 
Exercise of stock options and vesting of restricted stock1.5
 0.1
    
Stock-based compensation  2.4
    
Acquisition of noncontrolling interest
 1.2
   (5.2)
Purchase of treasury stock(0.5)   (5.9)  
Balance at December 31, 201274.8
0.8
600.9
(268.9)(182.1)(264.6)
        
Net income   94.5
  
Change in derivatives     (2.0) 
Foreign currency translation     (26.2)

Defined benefit plans, net     76.6
 
Exercise of stock options and vesting of restricted stock0.8
 1.1
    
Stock-based compensation  10.8
    
Purchase of treasury stock
   (0.4)  
Balance at December 31, 201375.6
$0.8
$612.8
$(174.4)$(182.5)$(216.2)$
        
Net income   143.0
  
Change in derivatives     (7.7) 
Foreign currency translation     (30.3)

Defined benefit plans, net     (42.7) 
Exercise of stock options and vesting of restricted stock0.2
 1.2
    
Stock-based compensation  9.7
    
Purchase of treasury stock
   (0.3)  
Balance at December 31, 201475.8
$0.8
$623.7
$(31.4)$(182.8)$(296.9)$
        

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements

41




AMERICAN AXLE & MANUFACTURING HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

1.ORGANIZATION AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
1. ORGANIZATION AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

ORGANIZATION American Axle & Manufacturing Holdings, Inc. (Holdings) and its subsidiaries (collectively, we, our, us or AAM) is a Tier I supplier to the automotive industry. We manufacture, engineer, design and validate driveline and drivetrain systems and related components and chassis modules for light trucks, sport utility vehicles (SUVs), passenger cars, crossover vehicles and commercial vehicles. Driveline and drivetrain systems include components that transfer power from the transmission and deliver it to the drive wheels. Our driveline, drivetrain and related products include axles, chassis modules, driveshafts, power transfer units, transfer cases, chassis and steering components, driveheads, transmission parts, electric drive systems and metal-formed products. In addition to locations in the United States (U.S.) (Michigan, New York, Ohio, Indiana and Pennsylvania), we also have offices or facilities in Brazil, China, Germany, India, Japan, Luxembourg, Mexico, Poland, Scotland, South Korea, Sweden and Thailand.

PRINCIPLES OF CONSOLIDATION We include the accounts of Holdings and its subsidiaries in our consolidated financial statements. We eliminate the effects of all intercompany transactions, balances and profits in our consolidation.

REVISION OF PRIOR PERIOD FINANCIAL STATEMENTS In connection with the preparation of our consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2014, we determined that entries recorded in the third quarter of 2014 to reduce certain accrued accounts payable balances by $8.4 million were previously recorded as a reduction of cost of goods sold but should have been recorded as an adjustment to opening accumulated deficit because the amounts giving rise to the correction originated in periods prior to January 1, 2012.

In accordance with ASC 250 Accounting Changes and Error Corrections as well as the SEC's Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 99, Materiality, we evaluated the materiality of this error on prior period financial statements and determined that it did not result in a material misstatement to the financial conditions, results of operations, or cash flows for any of the periods presented.

We also determined that the effect of recording the correction during the third quarter of 2014 was material to the financial statements for the three months ended September 30, 2014. As a result, prior period financial statements have been revised in accordance with ASC 250 and the SEC's Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 108, Considering the Effects of Prior Year Misstatements when Quantifying Misstatements in Current Year Financial Statements, and accumulated deficit at January 1, 2012 was reduced by $6.9 million. Consequently, the previously reported December 31, 2013 balances for accounts payable of $445.8 million, accumulated deficit of $181.3 million and current deferred income tax assets of $36.4 million were reduced by $8.4 million, $6.9 million and $1.5 million, respectively.

REVENUE RECOGNITION We recognize revenue when products are shipped to our customers and title transfers under standard commercial terms or when realizable in accordance with our commercial agreements. If we are uncertain as to whether we will be successful collecting a balance in accordance with our understanding of a commercial agreement, we do not recognize the revenue or cost recovery until such time as the uncertainty is removed.

In the first quarter of 2014, we reached an agreement with General Motors Company (GM) to increase installed capacity and adjust product mix for our largest vehicle program. As a result of this agreement, we received $32.8 million in 2014 and recorded the payments as deferred revenue. We will recognize this deferred revenue into sales over the life of the program on a straight line basis over approximately 5 years, which is the period we expect GM to benefit from this capacity and mix change. In 2014, we recognized revenue of $5.4 million related to this agreement. As of December 31, 2014, we have $6.9 million of deferred revenue that is classified as a current liability and $20.5 million of deferred revenue that is recorded as a noncurrent liability on our Consolidated Balance Sheet.

42



AMERICAN AXLE & MANUFACTURING HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)


Also in the first quarter of 2014, we reached an agreement with GM to recover certain costs related to the delay of another major product program. We received $9.3 million in 2014 related to this agreement and initially recorded deferred revenue of $9.3 million. We will recognize this deferred revenue into sales over the life of the program on a straight-line basis over approximately 8 years, which is the period we expect GM to benefit from this agreement. We began recognizing this deferred revenue as revenue in the third quarter of 2014 when this program launched in certain markets. In 2014, we recognized revenue of $0.5 million related to this agreement. As of December 31, 2014, we have recorded deferred revenue of $8.8 million, $1.1 million of which is classified as a current liability and $7.7 million which is recorded as a noncurrent liability on our Consolidated Balance Sheet.

In 2009, we entered into a settlement and commercial agreement (2009 Settlement and Commercial Agreement) with General Motors Company (GM). As part of this agreement, we received $110.0 million from GM, of which we recorded $79.7 million as deferred revenue.  As of December 31, 20112014, our deferred revenue related to the 2009 Settlement and Commercial Agreement is $61.437.5 million, $8.0 million of which is classified as a current liability and $53.429.5 million of which is recorded as a noncurrent liability on our Consolidated Balance Sheet.  We recognize this deferred revenue into revenue on a straight-line basis over 120 months, which ends September 2019 and is the period that we expect GM to benefit under the 2009 Settlement and Commercial Agreement.  We recognized revenue of $8.0 million, in both 20112014, 2013 and 2010 and $2.3 million in 20092012 related to this agreement.

In the second quarter of 2008, we entered into an agreement with GM to provide financial assistance to support the transition of our United Automobile, Aerospace and Agricultural Implement Workers of America (UAW) represented legacy labor at our original U.S. locations upon the resolution of the strike called by the International UAW (2008 AAM - GM Agreement).  Pursuant to this agreement, GM provided us $115.0 million in 2008 and $60.0 million in 2009. In total, we recorded deferred revenue of $213.7 million as a result of the 2008 AAM - GM Agreement, which included $38.7 million related to the fair value of the liability GM assumed for postretirement healthcare and life insurance coverage provided to UAW represented transitioned associates with earned credited service from AAM that have or will retire under plans operated by GM. We recognize this deferred revenue into revenue on a straight-line basis over a 45 month period, which ends February 2012 and is consistent with the period that we expect GM will benefit from the payments provided to us under the 2008 AAM - GM Agreement. We recognized $57.0 million of revenue in 2011, 2010 and 2009 related to the 2008 AAM - GM Agreement.  As of December 31, 2011, our deferred revenue related to the 2008 AAM - GM Agreement is $9.5 million, which is classified as a current liability on our Consolidated Balance Sheet.  

As of December 31, 20112014, the majority of the remaining deferred revenue primarily relates to customer payments to implement capacity programs, which is generally recognized into revenue over the life of these programs. We recognized $15.67.5 million, $12.510.5 million and $11.113.1 million of revenue for these programs in 20112014, 20102013 and 20092012, respectively.

42

AMERICAN AXLE & MANUFACTURING HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)


BUYDOWN PROGRAM In 2008, an involuntary Buydown Program (BDP) was initiated for associates that did not elect to participate in the Special Separation Program (SSP) and continued employment with AAM.  Under the BDP, we agreed to make three annual lump-sum payments to associates in connection with, among other things, a base wage decrease.  We made the third and final lump-sum BDP payment of $19.7 million in 2010.

As of December 31, 2011, we have $2.3 million in prepaid expenses and other on our Consolidated Balance Sheet for BDP payments that have been paid and we estimate will provide a benefit to the Company through February 2012.  We recorded $15.0 million, $15.6 million and $21.2 million of expense in 2011, 2010 and 2009, respectively, for the amortization of this asset.  

In 2008, we recorded expense of $51.9 million for the estimated amount of total BDP payments related to permanently idled associates throughout the new labor agreements.  This represented management's best estimate of the portion of the total BDP payment that would not result in a future benefit to the Company.  Due to capacity rationalization actions taken by GM and Chrysler as a result of their bankruptcy filings and subsequent reorganization plans and changes in our operating plans in the second quarter of 2009, we increased the estimated number of UAW-represented associates at our original U.S. locations that we expect to be permanently idled throughout the term of the 2008 labor agreements or to voluntarily elect to accelerate their remaining buydown payments and terminate employment.  As a result of this change in estimate, we recorded expense of $22.5 million in 2009, which represented the estimated additional BDP payments that will not result in a future benefit to AAM. Associates who are laid off for a certain length of time have the option to accelerate their remaining BDP lump-sum payments and terminate their employment with AAM.  Several associates elected this option and we made $0.7 million and $49.6 million of accelerated BDP payments in 2010 and 2009, respectively.    

RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT (R&D) COSTS We expense R&D, as incurred.incurred, in selling, general and administrative expenses on our Consolidated Statement of Income. R&D spending, net of engineering, design and development recoveries, was $113.6103.9 million, $82.5103.4 million and $67.0123.4 million in 20112014, 20102013 and 20092012, respectively.

CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS Cash and cash equivalents include all cash balances and highly liquid investments in money market funds with maturities of 90 days or less at the time of purchase.

ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE The majority of our accounts receivable are due from original equipment manufacturers (OEMs) in the automotive industry and are past due when payment is not received within the stated terms. As part of the 2009 Settlement and Commercial Agreement withTrade accounts receivable for our largest customer, GM, GM agreed to expedited payment terms of net 10 days in exchange for a 1% discount. On June 30, 2011, we elected to terminate the expedited payment terms and transition to GM standard weekly payment terms ofare generally due within approximately 50 days. days from the date of receipt.

Amounts due from customers are stated net of allowances for doubtful accounts. We determine our allowances by considering factors such as the length of time accounts are past due, our previous loss history, the customer's ability to pay its obligation to us, and the condition of the general economy and the industry as a whole. The allowance for doubtful accounts was $5.54.6 million and $6.24.9 million as of December 31, 20112014 and 20102013, respectively. We write-off accounts receivable when they become uncollectible.

CUSTOMER TOOLING AND PRE-PRODUCTION COSTS RELATED TO LONG-TERM SUPPLY AGREEMENTS Engineering, R&D, and other pre-production design and development costs for products sold on long-term supply arrangements are expensed as incurred unless we have a contractual guarantee for reimbursement from the customer. Costs for tooling used to make products sold on long-term supply arrangements for which we have either title to the assets or the non-cancelablenoncancelable right to use the assets during the term of the supply arrangement are capitalized in property, plant and equipment. Capitalized items and customer receipts in excess of tooling costs specifically related to a supply arrangement are amortized over the shorter of the term of the arrangement or over the estimated useful lives of the related assets.

43



AMERICAN AXLE & MANUFACTURING HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)


INVENTORIES We state our inventories at the lower of cost or market.  The cost of our inventories is determined using the FIFO method.  When we determine that our gross inventories exceed usage requirements, or if inventories become obsolete or otherwise not saleable, we record a provision for such loss as a component of our inventory accounts.

Inventories consist of the following:
                                
December 31,December 31,
2011 20102014 2013
(in millions)(in millions)
Raw materials and work-in-progress$177.0
 $137.7
$243.8
 $263.4
Finished goods26.9
 20.3
32.9
 25.7
Gross inventories203.9
 158.0
276.7
 289.1
Inventory valuation reserves(26.7) (27.7)(27.9) (27.3)
Inventories, net$177.2
 $130.3
$248.8
 $261.8

PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT Property, plant and equipment consists of the following:

 Estimated December 31,
 Useful Lives 2011 2010
 (years) (in millions)
Land  $30.6
 $28.2
Land improvements10-15 17.4
 15.6
Buildings and building improvements 15-40 273.5
 261.0
Machinery and equipment 3-12 1,405.5
 1,320.4
Construction in progress  138.2
 107.4
   1,865.2
 1,732.6
Accumulated depreciation and amortization  (894.0) (796.3)
Property, plant and equipment, net  $971.2
 $936.3

We state property, plant and equipment, including amortizable tooling, at historical cost, as adjusted for impairments. Construction in progress includes costs incurred for the construction of buildings and building improvements, and machinery and equipment in process. Repair and maintenance costs that do not extend the useful life or otherwise improve the utility of the asset beyond its existing useful state are expensed in the period incurred.

We record depreciation and tooling amortization on the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the depreciable assets. Depreciation and tooling amortization amounted to $123.7166.5 million, $122.2151.8 million and $126.6130.9 million in 20112014, 20102013 and 20092012, respectively.

Property, plant and equipment consists of the following:
 Estimated December 31,
 Useful Lives 2014 2013
 (years) (in millions)
Land  $26.2
 $29.5
Land improvements10-15 19.0
 18.9
Buildings and building improvements 15-40 314.3
 306.6
Machinery and equipment 3-12 1,770.7
 1,648.6
Construction in progress  91.4
 95.1
   2,221.6
 2,098.7
Accumulated depreciation and amortization  (1,160.5) (1,040.2)
Property, plant and equipment, net  $1,061.1
 $1,058.5

IMPAIRMENT OF LONG-LIVED ASSETS When impairment indicators exist, we evaluate the carrying value of long-lived assets for potential impairment. We consider projected future undiscounted cash flows, trends and other circumstances in making such estimates and evaluations. If impairment is deemed to exist, the carrying amount of the asset is adjusted based on its fair value. Recoverability of assets “held for use” is determined by comparing the forecasted undiscounted cash flows of the operations to which the assets relate to their carrying amount. When the carrying value of an asset group exceeds its fair value and is therefore nonrecoverable, those assets are written down to fair value. Fair value is determined based on market prices, when available, or a discounted cash flow analysis performed using management estimates. See Note 2 - Restructuring Actions for detail on our 2011 and 2010 asset impairments.

44



AMERICAN AXLE & MANUFACTURING HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)


GOODWILL We record goodwill when the purchase price of acquired businesses exceeds the value of their identifiable net tangible and intangible assets acquired. We periodically evaluate goodwill for impairment in accordance with the accounting guidance for goodwill and other indefinite-lived intangibles. We completed impairment tests in 20112014 and 20102013 and concluded that there was no impairment of our goodwill. The following table provides a reconciliation of changes in goodwill:

 December 31,
 2011 2010
 (in millions)
Beginning balance$155.8
 $147.8
Formation of e-AAM joint venture
 8.0
Foreign currency translation and other0.1
 
Ending balance$155.9
 $155.8

See Note 6 - Investment in Joint Ventures for detail on our additional goodwill recorded in 2010.
 December 31,
 2014 2013
 (in millions)
Beginning balance$156.4
 $156.4
Foreign currency translation(1.4) 
Ending balance$155.0
 $156.4

INTANGIBLE ASSETS As partWe are currently in the process of testing, validating and launching global enterprise resource planning (ERP) systems, at certain key locations, to upgrade many of our joint ventureexisting operating and financial systems. In connection with Saab Automobile AB (Saab),the development of these ERP systems, we have recorded intangible assets of $8.7 million in 2010, which represented the fair value of a GM license agreement for technology developed by Saab when it was a subsidiary of GM, in-process research and development technology and a long-term supply agreement with Saab acquired as part of the joint venture formation in 2010. In the third quarter of 2011, Saab, our partner in the e-AAM joint venture, entered a voluntary reorganization process. As a result, in the third quarter of 2011, we recorded a $1.6 million impairment charge to selling, general and administrative expenses to write off thean intangible asset associated with the long-term supply agreement with Saab. These intangible assets are classified as other assets and deferred chargesof $19.2 million on our Consolidated Balance Sheet and we expect to begin amortizing the assets on a straight-line basis over their estimated useful lives once development of the related technology is complete and we begin utilizing these assets.

We recorded an intangible asset of $9.6 million as of December 31, 2008 which represents the fair value of the customer relationships acquired as part of an asset purchase agreement with FormTech Industries LLC. We recorded $1.9 million of expense for the amortization of this intangible asset in both 2011 and 2010 and the balance is $3.9 millionas of December 31, 20112014. The intangible asset is related to costs incurred to obtain software licenses from a third party, as well as costs to design and develop this internal-use software. We incurred and capitalized $11.4 million and $7.8 million of these costs in 2014 and 2013, respectively. This intangible asset is classified as other assets and deferred charges on our Consolidated Balance Sheet and is beingwill be amortized over the estimated useful life of our ERP systems. We recorded $0.4 million and $0.1 million of expense for the amortization of these intangible assets in 2014 and 2013, respectively.

In connection with our e-AAM subsidiary, we have in-process research and development intangible assets which represent the technology that will be utilized in products to be launched in 2016. Accordingly, we will begin amortizing this asset on a straight-line basis over its estimated usefulat the start of production through the expected life cycle of fivethe related products, which is expected to be approximately 5-7 years. These intangible assets are classified as other assets and deferred charges on our Consolidated Balance Sheet. The following table provides a reconciliation of changes in the carrying value of our in-process research and development intangible assets:
 December 31,
 2014 2013
 (in millions)
Beginning balance$7.4
 $7.4
Foreign currency translation(1.2) 
Ending balance$6.2
 $7.4

DEBT ISSUANCE COSTS The costs related to the issuance or modification of long-term debt are deferred and amortized into interest expense over the life of each debt issue. As of December 31, 20112014 and December 31, 2010,2013, our unamortized debt issuance costs were $31.5$29.5 million. and $35.6 million, respectively. Deferred amounts associated with the extinguishment of debt are expensed and classified as debt refinancing and redemption costs on our Consolidated Statement of Operations.Income.

DERIVATIVES We recognize all derivatives on the balance sheet at fair value.value and we are not subject to a master netting agreement. If a derivative qualifies under the accounting guidance as a hedge, depending on the nature of the hedge, changes in the fair value of the derivative are either offset against the change in fair value of the hedged assets, liabilitiesasset, liability or firm commitmentscommitment through earnings or recognized in other comprehensive income until the hedged item is recognized in earnings. The ineffective portion of a derivative's change in fair value, and changes in the fair value of derivatives that do not qualify as hedges, are immediately recognized in earnings. See Note 43 - Derivatives and Risk Management, for more detail on our derivatives.

CURRENCY TRANSLATION We translate the assets and liabilities of our foreign subsidiaries to U.S. dollars at end-of-period exchange rates. We translate the income statement elements of our foreign subsidiaries to U.S. dollars at average-period exchange rates. We report the effect of translation for our foreign subsidiaries that use the local currency as their functional currency as a separate component of stockholders' deficit.equity. Gains and losses

45



AMERICAN AXLE & MANUFACTURING HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

resulting from the remeasurement of assets and liabilities in a currency other than the functional currency of a subsidiary are reported in current period income. We also report any gains and losses arising from transactions denominated in a currency other than the functional currency of a subsidiary in current period income. These foreign currency gains and losses resulted in a gain of $6.4 million and losses of $4.2 million and $6.3 million, for the years ended 2014, 2013 and 2012, respectively.

45

AMERICAN AXLE & MANUFACTURING HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)


USE OF ESTIMATES In order to prepare consolidated financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (GAAP), we are required to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts and disclosures in our consolidated financial statements. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

EFFECT OF NEW ACCOUNTING STANDARDS In June 2011, the FASB issuedOn January 1, 2014, new accounting guidance on thebecame effective regarding financial statement presentation of comprehensive income.an unrecognized tax benefit when a net operating loss (NOL) carryforward, a similar tax loss, or a tax credit carryforward exists. The new guidance allows an entityrequires entities to present componentsan unrecognized tax benefit, or a portion of net income and other comprehensive incomean unrecognized tax benefit, in the financial statements as a reduction to a deferred tax asset for an NOL carryforward, a similar tax loss, or a tax credit carryforward, except when one continuous statement, referredis not available as of the reporting date or the entity does not intend to use the deferred tax asset for this purpose. This guidance does not affect the tabular reconciliation of the total amounts of unrecognized tax benefits, as the statementtabular reconciliation presents the gross amount of comprehensive income, or in two separate, but consecutive statements.unrecognized tax benefits. The guidance eliminates the current option to report other comprehensive income and its components in the statement of changes in equity. While the new guidance changes the presentation of comprehensive income, there are no changes to the components that are recognized in net income or other comprehensive income under current accounting guidance. This new guidance is effective for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2011. Other than the change in presentation, the adoption of this new guidance will not have anhas had no impact on our consolidated financial statements.

In September 2011, the FASB issuedMay 2014, new accounting guidance was issued that outlines a single comprehensive model for entities to use in accounting for revenue arising from contracts with customers and supersedes most current revenue recognition guidance, including industry-specific guidance. The guidance is based on testing goodwillthe principle that an entity should recognize revenue to depict the transfer of goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for impairment. This newthose goods or services.  The guidance will allow usalso requires additional disclosure about the nature, amount, timing and uncertainty of revenue and cash flows arising from customer contracts, including significant judgments and changes in judgments and assets recognized from costs incurred to fulfill a contract.  Entities have the option to first assess qualitative factors to determine whether it is necessary to performof using either a full retrospective or a modified retrospective approach for the two-step quantitative goodwill impairment test. Under these amendments, we would not be required to calculateadoption of the fair value of a reporting unit unless we determine, based on a qualitative assessment, that it is more likely than not that its fair value is less than its carrying amount. The amendments include a number of events and circumstances to consider in conducting the qualitative assessment.new standard.  This new guidance isbecomes effective for interimAAM at the beginning of our 2017 fiscal year and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2011 with early adoption is not permitted.  We have not adoptedare currently assessing the impact that this guidance as of December 31, 2011 and do not believe the adoptionstandard will have a significant effect on our goodwill impairment assessments in the future.consolidated financial statements.

2.RESTRUCTURING ACTIONSLONG-TERM DEBT AND LEASE OBLIGATIONS

In 2011, we incurred restructuring charges related to asset impairments, indirect inventory obsolescence, asset retirement obligations and other ongoing restructuring actions.  In addition, we continue to make payments and accrual adjustments related to charges incurred for restructuring actions taken in prior years. A summaryLong-term debt consists of this activity for 2011 and 2010 is shown below:

the following:
 One-time Termination BenefitsAsset Impairment ChargesIndirect Inventory ObsolescenceAsset Retirement ObligationsContract Related CostsOther Restructuring ActionsTotal
 (in millions)
Accrual as of January 1, 2010$8.0
$
$
$1.3
$21.3
$
$30.6
Charges
8.4
0.3
0.1

0.2
9.0
Cash utilization(6.0)


(6.8)(0.2)(13.0)
Non-cash utilization
(8.4)(0.3)


(8.7)
Accrual adjustments(0.8)


(2.3)
(3.1)
Accrual as of December 31, 2010$1.2
$
$
$1.4
$12.2
$
$14.8
Charges0.1
8.1
0.6
0.1

6.9
15.8
Cash utilization(0.9)

(1.0)(7.2)(6.9)(16.0)
Non-cash utilization
(8.1)(0.6)


(8.7)
Accrual adjustments(0.1)

0.1
(5.0)
(5.0)
Accrual as of December 31, 2011$0.3
$
$
$0.6
$
$
$0.9
 December 31,
 2014 2013
 (in millions)
Revolving Credit Facility$
 $
Term Facility142.5
 150.0
7.75% Notes200.0
 200.0
6.625% Notes550.0
 550.0
6.25% Notes400.0
 400.0
5.125% Notes200.0
 200.0
Foreign credit facilities38.9
 53.8
Capital lease obligations5.0
 5.3
Debt1,536.4
 1,559.1
Less: Current portion of long-term debt13.0
 
Long-term debt$1,523.4
 $1,559.1


46



AMERICAN AXLE & MANUFACTURING HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

ONE-TIME TERMINATION BENEFITS We paid $0.9 million and $6.0 million in 2011 and 2010, respectively, related to one-time termination benefits which were initiated and expensed prior to 2010.

We also recorded accrual adjustments related to changes in previous estimates and currency translation adjustments.

ASSET IMPAIRMENTS In the third quarter of 2011, we recorded asset impairment charges of $8.1 million associated with the announced closure of our Cheektowaga Manufacturing Facility (CKMF). In the second quarter of 2010, we recorded asset impairment charges of $8.4 million as a result of the announced closure of our Salem Manufacturing Facility.

INDIRECT INVENTORY OBSOLESCENCE As a result of the reduction in the projected usage of machinery and equipment due to the impairment indicators discussed above, certain machine repair parts and other indirect inventory were determined to be obsolete. We recorded a charge of $0.6 million in 2011 and $0.3 million in 2010 related to the write down of the net book value of these assets to their estimated net realizable value.

ASSET RETIREMENT OBLIGATIONS As a result of announced plant closures, idling and consolidation of facilities, the methods and timing of certain asset retirement obligations, including environmental liabilities, related to these facilities became reasonably estimable.  Based on management's best estimate of the costs, methods and timing of the settlement of these obligations, we recorded a charge of $0.1 million in both 2011 and 2010. In 2011, we paid $1.0 million related to these asset retirement obligations.

CONTRACT RELATED COSTS In 2011, as a result of the announced closure of our Detroit Manufacturing Complex (DMC), we elected to buy out leased assets that were previously determined to be permanently idled. In the fourth quarter of 2011, we paid $18.6 million to purchase these leased assets, along with others that are being utilized. As a result, we recorded a reduction of cost of goods sold of $5.0 million to write-off the remaining accrual that was originally recorded when these assets were idled. See Note 5 - Fair Value for more detail on this lease buyout.

In 2010, we adjusted our operating plans and revised certain sourcing arrangements. As a result, we elected to buy out and utilize certain leased assets that were previously determined to be permanently idled. In 2010, we paid $4.0 million to purchase these leased assets and recorded a reduction of cost of goods sold of $2.3 million to adjust the accrual that was originally recorded when these assets were idled.

OTHER RESTRUCTURING ACTIONS We incurred charges related to the redeployment of assets to support capacity utilization initiatives and other related activities. We expensed and paid $6.9 million in 2011 and $0.2 million in 2010 related to these actions.

We expect to make payments of $0.9 million in 2012 related to the remaining restructuring accrual.


47

AMERICAN AXLE & MANUFACTURING HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

3.LONG-TERM DEBT AND LEASE OBLIGATIONS

Long-term debt consists of the following:

 December 31,
 2011 2010
 (in millions)
    
Revolving credit facility$
 $
9.25% Notes, net of discount379.0
 420.3
7.875% Notes300.0
 300.0
7.75% Notes200.0
 
5.25% Notes, net of discount249.9
 249.9
2.00% Convertible Notes
 0.4
Foreign credit facilities45.2
 32.6
Capital lease obligations6.1
 6.8
Long-term debt$1,180.2
 $1,010.0

REVOLVING CREDIT FACILITY AND TERM FACILITY In the second quarter of 2011, we amended and restated the Credit Agreement dated as of January 9, 2004 (as amended and restated, the “Amended and Restated Revolving Credit Agreement” and the facility thereunder, the “Amended Revolving Credit Facility”). As of December 31, 20112014, the Amended Revolving Credit Facilityrevolving credit facility provided up to $86.8523.5 million of revolving bank financing commitments through June 2013 and $235.0 million of such revolving bank financing commitments through June 30, 2016.September 13, 2018. At December 31, 20112014, $293.3505.5 million was available under the Amended Revolving Credit Facility,revolving credit facility, which reflected a reduction of $28.518.0 million for standby letters of credit issued against the facility.

The Amendedcredit agreement provides for a senior secured term loan A facility in an aggregate principal amount of $150.0 million (term facility). During 2014, we made principal payments of $7.5 million on our term facility. We paid remaining debt issuance costs of $0.1 million in 2014 associated with the execution of amending our revolving credit facility and Restated Revolving Credit Agreement, among other things, increased the aggregate commitments by approximately $79.0 millionterm facility. In 2013 and extended the maturity of $235.0 million of the aggregate commitments to June 30, 2016. We2012, we paid debt issuance costs of $5.9$6.9 million, $1.6 and $1.7 million, and $14.5 million respectively, associated with the amendments and restatements of our Revolving Credit Facility in 2011, 2010 and 2009, respectively.revolving credit facility.

Borrowings under the Amended Revolving Credit Facilityrevolving credit facility and term facility bear interest at rates based on adjusted LIBOR or an alternate base rate, plus an applicable margin. The applicable margin for LIBOR basedLIBOR-based loans for lenders who extended their maturities will be between 3.00%1.5% and 4.50%, depending upon the corporate ratings of the Company. The applicable margin for lenders who did not extend their maturities remained unchanged.3.0%.

UnderIn the Amended Revolving Credit Facility, weevent AAM achieves investment grade corporate credit ratings from S&P and Moody's, AAM may elect to release all of the collateral from the liens granted pursuant to the collateral agreement, subject to notice requirements and other conditions. The revolving credit facility and term facility are required to comply with financial covenants related to secured indebtedness leverage, total net leverage,on a first priority basis by all or substantially all of the assets of AAM and cash interest expense coverage.each guarantor under the collateral agreement dated as of November 7, 2008, as amended and restated as of September 13, 2013. The Amended Revolving Credit Facilityrevolving credit facility limits our ability to make certain investments, loans and guarantees, declare or pay dividends or distributions on capital stock, redeem or repurchase capital stock and certain debt obligations, incur liens, incur indebtedness, orenter into certain restrictive agreements, merge, make acquisitions andor sell all or substantially all of our assets.

The Amended Revolving Credit Facility is secured on a first priority basis by substantially all of the assets of Holdings, AAM Inc. and each guarantor party thereto, including a pledge of all capital stock of the U.S. subsidiaries of Holdings and each guarantor and a portion of the capital stock of AAM Inc. and each guarantor's first-tier foreign subsidiaries. In addition, obligations under the Amended Revolving Credit Facility are guaranteed by Holdings and AAM Inc.'s U.S. subsidiaries, all of which are directly owned by AAM Inc.

The Amended Revolving Credit Facilityrevolving credit facility provides back-up liquidity for our otherforeign credit facilities. We intend to use the availability of long-term financing under the Amended Revolving Credit Facilityrevolving credit facility to refinance any current maturities related to such debt agreements that are not otherwise refinanced on a long-term basis in their local markets.markets, except where otherwise reclassified to current portion of long-term debt on our Consolidated Balance Sheet.


48

AMERICAN AXLE & MANUFACTURING HOLDINGS, INC.In the first quarter of 2013, we terminated our class C loan facility of $72.8 million, which would have matured on June 30, 2013. Upon termination, we expensed $0.5 million of unamortized debt issuance costs related to the class C facility. We had been amortizing the debt issuance costs over the expected life of the borrowing.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

9.25% NOTES In 2009, we issued $425.0 million of 9.25% senior secured notes due 2017 (9.25% Notes). The notes were issued at a discount of $5.5 million. Net proceeds from these notes were used for the repayment of certain indebtedness. In 2010 and 2009, we paid debt issuance costs of $0.3 million and $12.6 million, respectively, related to the 9.25% Notes.

In the second quarter of 2011,2012, we elected to exercise an option to redeem 10% of the original amount of our 9.25% Notes outstanding at a redemption price of 103% of the principal amount. This resulted in a principal paymentpayments of $42.5 million and a $1.3 million payment for the redemption premium, as well as a payment related topayments of accrued interest. Upon repayment, weinterest in both 2012. We expensed $1.41.0 million in 2012 for the write offwrite-off of a proportional amount of unamortized debt discount and issuance costs related to this debt. Wedebt that we had been amortizing the debt issuance costs and debt discount over the expected life of the borrowing. We have the right to voluntarily redeem an additional 10% of our 9.25% Notes in June 2012 and another 10% twelve months thereafter.

ThePursuant to the terms of our 9.25% Notes, sharein the collateral package equallyfourth quarter of 2013, we voluntarily redeemed the remaining outstanding 9.25% Notes using the proceeds from the Term Facility and ratably with the Amended Revolving Credit Facilityissuance of the 5.125% Notes. This resulted in a principal payment of $340.0 million and $18.9 million for redemption premiums, as described above. The indenture governingwell as payments of accrued interest. We expensed $6.7 million in 2013 related to the write-off of the remaining unamortized debt discount and issuance costs related to our 9.25% Notes limits our ability to make certain investments, declare or pay dividends or distributions on capital stock, redeem or repurchase capital stock and certain debt obligations, incur liens, incur indebtedness, transact with affiliates or merge, make acquisitions and sell assets.that we had been amortizing over the expected life of the borrowing.

7.875% NOTES In 2007, we issued $300.0 million of 7.875% senior unsecured notes due 2017 (7.875% Notes). Net proceeds from these notes were used for general corporate purposes, including payment of amounts outstanding under our Revolving Credit Facility.revolving credit facility.

In the first quarter of 2013, we voluntarily purchased and redeemed $300.0 million of our 7.875% Notes, and paid accrued interest. Upon purchase and redemption, we expensed $8.5 million related to redemption premiums, $0.1 million of professional fees and unamortized debt issuance costs of $2.1 million related to this debt. We had been amortizing the debt issuance costs over the expected life of the borrowing.

47



AMERICAN AXLE & MANUFACTURING HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)


7.75% NOTES In the fourth quarter of 2011, we issued $200.0 million of 7.75% senior unsecured notes due 2019 (7.75% Notes). Net proceeds from these notes were used for general corporate purposes, including the repayment of certain amounts outstanding under our Revolving Credit Facility. revolving credit facility.

6.625% NOTES In 2011,2012, we issued $550.0 million of 6.625% senior unsecured notes due 2022 (6.625% Notes). Net proceeds from the 6.625% Notes were used to fund the purchase and redemption of $250.0 million of the outstanding 5.25% senior unsecured notes, including the payment of interest, the redemption of $42.5 million aggregate principal amount of our 9.25% Notes, certain pension obligations and for other general corporate purposes. We paid debt issuance costs of $5.08.9 million related to the 7.75%6.625% Notes in 2012.

6.25% NOTES In 2013, we issued $400.0 million of 6.25% senior unsecured notes due 2021 (6.25% Notes). Net proceeds from the 6.25% Notes were used to fund the purchase and redemption of our 7.875% Notes and for other general corporate purposes. We paid debt issuance costs of $6.6 million in 2013 related to the 6.25% Notes.

5.25%5.125% NOTES The In th5.25% Notes aree fourth quarter of 2013, we issued $200.0 million of 5.125% senior unsecured obligationsnotes due February 2014.

2.00% CONVERTIBLE NOTES The 2.00% Senior Convertible Notes due 2024 were convertible into cash under terms of2019 (5.125% Notes). Net proceeds from the indenture. A total of $0.4 million of the notes were converted into cash in 2011. The remaining outstanding 2.00% Convertible5.125% Notes were fully redeemedused to redeem the remaining $190.0 million outstanding under our 9.25% Notes. We paid debt issuance costs related to the 5.125% Notes of $0.2 million and $3.1 million in the third quarter of 2011.2014 and 2013, respectively.

LEASES We lease certain facilities under capital leases expiring at various dates. The gross asset cost of our capital leaseslease was $16.16.7 million at both December 31, 20112014 and December 31, 20102013. The net book value included in property, plant and equipment, net on the balance sheet was $6.05.0 million and $6.65.3 million at December 31, 20112014 and 20102013, respectively. The weighted-average interest rate on thesethis capital lease obligationsobligation at December 31, 20112014 was 8.8%8.9%.

We also lease certain manufacturing machinery and equipment, commercial office and production facilities, vehicles and other assets under operating leases expiring at various dates. In 2013 and 2012, we entered into various sale-leaseback transactions for equipment to be used in production starting in 2013. We received proceeds of $24.1 million and $12.1 million in 2013 and 2012, respectively, as a result of these transactions. Future minimum payments under noncancelable operating leases are as follows: $5.2$19.9 million in 2012, $4.0 million in 2013, $3.5 million in 2014, $2.1 million in 2015, $18.5 million in 2016, $15.1 million in 2017, $7.9 million in 2018, and $1.4$3.5 million in 2016.2019. Our total expense relating to operating leases was $6.8$23.6 million,, $5.3 $17.6 million and $33.4$9.0 million in 2011, 20102014, 2013 and 2009,2012, respectively. This includes a reduction to cost of goods sold of $0.5 million and $2.3 million related to the purchase of previously idled leased assets in 2011 and 2010, respectively, and expense of $21.1 million in 2009 related to the permanent idling of leased assets. See Note 2 - Restructuring Actions for more detail on these charges.
    
FOREIGN CREDIT FACILITIES We utilize local currency credit facilities to finance the operations of certain foreign subsidiaries. These credit facilities, some of which are guaranteed by Holdings and/or AAM, Inc., expire at various dates through January 2015.July 2019. At December 31, 20112014, $45.238.9 million was outstanding under these facilities and an additional $16.051.1 million was available.

49

AMERICAN AXLE & MANUFACTURING HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)


SECOND LIEN TERM LOAN FACILITY As part of the 2009 Settlement and Commercial Agreement with GM, we entered into certain agreements which, among other things, provided us with expedited payment terms of “net 10 days” in exchange for a 1% early payment discount and a $100.0 million Second Lien Term Loan Facility with GM through December 31, 2013.  We paid $0.3 million of debt issuance costs related to the Second Lien Term Loan Facility in 2010. Pursuant to the terms of such agreements, we elected to terminate the expedited payment terms and the Second Lien Term Loan Agreement, effective June 30, 2011. As a result of these terminations, our Access and Security Agreement with GM expired on September 28, 2011.

DEBT MATURITIES Aggregate maturities of long-term debt are as follows (in millions):

2012$41.8
20132.7
2014251.7
20150.4
$35.2
20160.5
17.1
201719.1
2018109.2
2019403.4
Thereafter883.1
952.4
Total$1,180.2
$1,536.4

INTEREST EXPENSE AND INVESTMENT INCOME Interest expense was $83.999.9 million in 20112014, $89.0115.9 million in 20102013 and $84.5101.6 million in 20092012. The decrease in interest expense in 20112014 as compared to 2010 relates2013 is primarily due to higher capitalizedthe decrease in our weighted-average interest rate for the full year 2014 as a result of increased capital expenditurescompared to support our significant global program launches.full year 2013. The decrease is also driven by lower average outstanding borrowings in 2014 as compared to 2013. The increase in interest expense in 20102013 as compared to 2009 primarily2012 reflects higher interest rates and amortization of debt issuance costs. average outstanding borrowings, during those comparable periods.


48



AMERICAN AXLE & MANUFACTURING HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

We capitalized interest of $8.35.8 million in 20112014, $4.06.6 million in 20102013 and $7.18.2 million in 20092012. The weighted-average interest rate of our long-term debt outstanding at December 31, 20112014 was 8.0%6.4% as compared to 8.2%6.3% and 8.3%7.9% at December 31, 20102013 and 2009, respectively. The amount of accrued interest included in other accrued expenses on our Consolidated Balance Sheet was $32.0 million and $31.1 million as of December 31, 2011 and 20102012, respectively.

Investment income was $1.22.1 million in 2011, $3.8 million2014 as compared to $0.6 million in both 20102013 and $2.0 million in 20092012. Investment income includes interest and dividends earned on cash and cash equivalents and realized and unrealized gains and losses on our short-term investments during the period. In 2008, redemptions were temporarily suspended for certain money-market and other similar funds in which we invest.  We recorded a gain of $0.1 million and $2.3 million in 2011 and 2010, respectively, related to distributions of our short-term investments, from which distributions were previously suspended. In 2009, we recorded an other-than-temporary impairment of $1.3 million based on the estimated fair value of our remaining investments in these funds.

4.3.DERIVATIVES AND RISK MANAGEMENT

DERIVATIVE FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS In the normal course of business, we are exposed to market risk associated with changes in foreign currency exchange rates and interest rates. To manage a portion of these inherent risks, we may purchase certain types of derivative financial instruments based on management's judgment of the trade-off between risk, opportunity and cost. We do not hold or issue derivative financial instruments for trading or speculative purposes. The ineffective portion of any hedge is included in current earnings. The impact of hedge ineffectiveness was not significant in any of the periods presented.

CURRENCY FORWARD CONTRACTS From time to time, we use foreign currency forward contracts to reduce the effects of fluctuations in exchange rates, primarily relating to the Mexican Peso, Euro, Swedish Krona, Polish Zloty and Pound Sterling and Brazilian Real.Sterling. We had currency forward contracts relating to the Mexican Peso with a notional amount of $68.6$99.3 million and $48.0$67.2 million outstanding at December 31, 20112014 and 2010, respectively.2013, respectively, that hedge our exposure to changes in foreign currency exchange rates for our payroll expenses, indirect inventory and other working capital items.

50

AMERICAN AXLE & MANUFACTURING HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)


The following table summarizes the reclassification of pre-tax derivative gains (losses) into net income from accumulated other comprehensive income (loss):

 Location of Gain Reclassified into Net Income Gain Reclassified During the Twelve Months Ended December 31, Loss Expected to be Reclassified During the Next 12 Months
 2014 2013 
   (in millions)
Currency forward contractsCost of Goods Sold $0.9
 $2.8
 $(7.2)
 Location of Gain (Loss) Reclassified into Net Income Gain Reclassified During the Twelve Months Ended December 31, Loss Expected to be Reclassified During the Next 12 Months
 2011 2010 
   (in millions)
Currency forward contractsCost of Goods Sold $1.9
 $0.8
 $(5.5)


51

AMERICAN AXLE & MANUFACTURING HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

CONCENTRATIONS OF CREDIT RISK In the normal course of business, we provide credit to customers. We periodically evaluate the creditworthiness of our customers and we maintain reserves for potential credit losses.

Sales to GM were approximately 73%, 75% and 78%68% of our totalconsolidated net sales in 2011, 20102014, 71% in 2013, and 2009, respectively.73% in 2012 . Accounts and other receivables due from GM were $234.7343.1 million at year-end 20112014 and $45.5278.5 million at year-end 20102013. Sales to FCA US LLC, formerly known as Chrysler Group LLC, (Chrysler) were approximately 8%18% of our totalconsolidated net sales in 20112014, 9%12% in 20102013 and 8%10% in 20092012. Accounts receivable due from Chrysler were $29.199.3 million at year-end 20112014 and $27.385.9 million at year-end 20102013. No other single customer accounted for more than 10% of our consolidated net sales in any year presented.

In addition, our total GM postretirement cost sharing asset was $270.6287.8 million as of December 31, 20112014 and $254.4255.9 million as of December 31, 20102013. See Note 85 - Employee Benefit Plans for more detail on this cost sharing asset.

We diversify the concentration of invested cash and cash equivalents among different financial institutions and we monitor the selection of counterparties to other financial instruments to avoid unnecessary concentrations of credit risk.


49



AMERICAN AXLE & MANUFACTURING HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

5.4.FAIR VALUE

The fair value accounting guidance defines fair value as “the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date.”  The definition is based on an exit price rather than an entry price, regardless of whether the entity plans to hold or sell the asset.  This guidance also establishes a fair value hierarchy to prioritize inputs used in measuring fair value as follows:

Level 1:  Observable inputs such as quoted prices in active markets;
Level 2:  Inputs, other than quoted prices in active markets, that are observable either directly or indirectly; and
Level 3:  Unobservable inputs in which there is little or no market data, which require the reporting entity to develop its own assumptions.

FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS  The estimated fair values of our financial assets and liabilities that are recognized at fair value on a recurring basis, using available market information and other observable data are as follows:

December 31, 2011 December 31, 2010 December 31, 2014 December 31, 2013 
Carrying Amount Fair Value Carrying Amount Fair Value InputCarrying Amount Fair Value Carrying Amount Fair Value Input
(in millions) (in millions) (in millions) (in millions) 
Balance Sheet Classification                
Cash equivalents$36.0
 $36.0
 $152.5
 $152.5
 Level 1$35.3
 $35.3
 $6.1
 $6.1
 Level 1
Prepaid expenses and other                
Currency forward contracts0.1
 0.1
 1.3
 1.3
 Level 2
 
 0.7
 0.7
 Level 2
Other assets and deferred charges        
Currency forward contracts0.1
 0.1
 
 
 Level 2
Other accrued expenses                
Currency forward contracts5.6
 5.6
 
 
 Level 28.3
 8.3
 0.4
 0.4
 Level 2
Other long-term liabilities        
Currency forward contracts0.1
 0.1
 
 
 Level 2

52

AMERICAN AXLE & MANUFACTURING HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)


The carrying values of our cash, accounts receivable, accounts payable and accrued liabilities approximatesapproximate their fair values due to the short-term maturities of these instruments.  The carrying valuevalues of our borrowings under the foreign credit facilities approximatesapproximate their fair valuevalues due to the frequent resetting of the interest rates.  We estimated the fair value of our outstanding debt using available market information and other observable data to be as follows:
 
 December 31, 2011 December 31, 2010  
 Carrying Amount Fair Value Carrying Amount Fair Value Input
 (in millions) (in millions)  
          
Revolving Credit Facility$
 $
 $
 $
 Level 2
9.25% Notes379.0
 415.0
 420.3
 473.9
 Level 2
7.875% Notes300.0
 295.5
 300.0
 306.0
 Level 2
7.75% Notes200.0
 195.0
 
 
 Level 2
5.25% Notes249.9
 243.8
 249.9
 245.0
 Level 2
 December 31, 2014 December 31, 2013  
 Carrying Amount Fair Value Carrying Amount Fair Value Input
 (in millions) (in millions)  
          
Revolving Credit Facility$
 $
 $
 $
 Level 2
Term Facility142.5
 141.1
 150.0
 147.8
 Level 2
7.75% Notes200.0
 224.0
 200.0
 227.5
 Level 2
6.625% Notes550.0
 583.0
 550.0
 578.9
 Level 2
6.25% Notes400.0
 419.0
 400.0
 423.0
 Level 2
5.125% Notes200.0
 202.6
 200.0
 206.0
 Level 2

Investments in our defined benefit pension plans are stated at fair value. See Note 85 - Employee Benefit Plans for additional fair value disclosures of our pension plan assets as of December 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010.assets.

LONG-LIVED ASSETS  In 2011 and 2010,2012 as part of our impairment analysis, we were required to measure the fair value of certain long-lived assets.  In 2011, weWe considered the expected future use of thecertain long-lived assets locatedremaining at our CheektowagaDetroit Manufacturing Facility.Complex (DMC). Assets that willwere not to be redeployed to other AAM facilities were determined to be fully impaired. In 2010, we utilized the income approach, which determines fair value through a discounted cash flow analysis based on the assumptions a market participant would use in pricing these assets.  Significant inputs used by management when determining the fair value of long-lived assets for impairment include general economic conditions, future expected production volumes, product pricing and cost estimates, working capital and capital investment requirements, discount rates and estimated liquidation values.

50



AMERICAN AXLE & MANUFACTURING HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)


The following table summarizes impairments of long-lived assets measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis subsequent to initial recognition:
Balance Sheet Classification Fair Value Measurements using Level 3 Inputs Asset Impairment Recorded in Twelve Months ended December 31, 2011 Fair Value Measurements using Level 3 Inputs Asset Impairment Recorded in Twelve Months ended December 31, 2010 Fair Value Measurements using Level 3 Inputs Asset Impairment Recorded in Twelve Months ended December 31, 2012
 (in millions)  
Property, plant and equipment, net $
 $8.1
 $
 $7.6
 $
 $5.8
Other assets and deferred charges 
 0.5
 
 0.8

In the fourth quarter of 2011,2012, we elected to buyout the remaining leases at our Detroit Manufacturing Complex. We paid $18.6 million to purchase these assets. As part of our fair value measurement, we consideredreassessed the expected future use of these long-livedcertain assets and recorded themremaining at their estimated fair value. AssetsDMC that will not be redeployed to other AAM facilities were written down to their estimated net realizable value, which resultedpreviously leased assets that had been purchased in a net charge to cost of goods sold of2011 for $5.318.6 million in 2011.

53

AMERICAN AXLE & MANUFACTURING HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)


In 2010, we classified certain administrative and engineering facilities located in Detroit, Michigan as held-for-sale and wrote these assets down to their estimated fair value using available market data.. As a result, we recorded a lossan impairment charge of $5.15.8 million in 2010, of which $3.3 million was recorded to selling, general and administrative expenses and $1.8 million was recorded to cost of goods sold. In 2010, we reclassified $1.1 million from property, plant and equipment, net to other assets and deferred charges on our Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet. The following table summarizes the loss on remeasurement of long-lived assets held-for-sale measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis subsequent to initial recognition:
Balance Sheet Classification Fair Value Measurements using Level 3 Inputs Loss on Remeasurement Recorded in Twelve Months ended December 31, 2010
  (in millions)
Other assets and deferred charges $1.1
 $5.1

Finite-lived Intangibles In the third quarter of 2011, Saab, our partner in the e-AAM joint venture, entered a voluntary reorganization process. As a result, in the third quarter of 2011, we recorded a $1.6 million impairment charge to selling, general and administrative expenses to write off the intangible asset associated with the long-term supply agreement with Saab acquired as part of our joint venture formation in 2010. The following table summarizes the impairment of finite-lived intangible assets measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis subsequent to initial recognition:
Balance Sheet Classification Fair Value Measurement Using Level 3 Inputs Impairment Recorded in the Twelve Months Ended December 31, 2011
  (in millions)
Other assets and deferred charges $
 $1.6


54

AMERICAN AXLE & MANUFACTURING HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

6.INVESTMENT IN JOINT VENTURES
In 2009, we formed a joint venture with Hefei Automobile Axle Co, Ltd.(HAAC), a subsidiary of Anhui Jianghuai Automobile Group Co, Ltd. (JV). In the fourth quarter of 2011, we made an additional investment of $16.5 million in this JV to expand into HAAC's light commercial axle business. Each party continues to own 50 percent of the JV, which we account for under the equity method of accounting. We recorded both our initial investment of $10.2 million in 2009, as well as our additional investment in the JV in 2011 at cost, and adjusted the carrying amount of the investment to recognize our proportionate share of the earnings of the JV. Our investment is classified as other assets and deferred charges on our Consolidated Balance Sheet.

In 2010, we formed a joint venture with Saab.  The new company, e-AAM Driveline Systems AB (e-AAM), engineers and develops electric all-wheel-drive (eAWD) hybrid driveline systems to be commercialized for passenger cars and crossover vehicles.  We consolidated e-AAM as we are the majority owner, owning 67% of the shares in this joint venture while Saab owns the remaining 33%. In the fourth quarter of 2011, Saab filed for bankruptcy and has entered into liquidation status. We are currently in the process of negotiating the purchase of Saab's shares in this JV.

In connection with the formation of e-AAM, we agreed to contribute ongoing funding to cover e-AAM's business operations through 2012 in the amount of approximately $26 million, based on exchange rates at that time, of which we paid approximately $16 million in 2011 and $5 million in 2010. In exchange for its ownership interest in e-AAM, Saab contributed its existing business related to the eAWD technology, consisting of a workforce of skilled engineersassets that we no longer intended to redeploy and intangible assets which include a GM license agreement for the Saab developed eAWD technology while it was owned by GM, a long-term supply agreement with Saab, under which e-AAM will supply the eAWD technology for certain future Saab product platforms, and existing technology in the form of in-process R&D. We recorded intangible assets of $8.7 million as of December 31, 2010 in connection with the acquisition of this business from Saab. See Note 1 - Organization and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies for more detail on subsequent changes to these intangible assets. We also recorded $8.0 million of goodwill associated with the formation of e-AAM and the acquisition of the business from Saab in 2010.use at another AAM facility.

7.STOCKHOLDER RIGHTS PLAN

In September 2003, our Board of Directors adopted a Stockholder Rights Plan (the Rights Plan) and declared a dividend of one preferred share purchase right for each outstanding share of common stock for stockholders of record on September 25, 2003. The Rights Plan provides a reasonable means of safeguarding the interests of all stockholders against unsolicited takeover attempts at a price not reflective of the Company's fair value. The Rights Plan is designed to give the Board of Directors sufficient time to evaluate and respond to an unsolicited takeover attempt and to encourage anyone or group considering such action to negotiate first with the Board of Directors.
On October 30, 2009, we amended the Rights Plan in order to preserve the long-term value and availability of our net operating loss (NOL) carryforwards and related tax benefits (“Amended Rights Plan”). The Amended Rights Plan, among other things, reduced the beneficial ownership threshold at which a person or group becomes an “Acquiring Person” under the plan from 15% of our then-outstanding shares of common stock to 4.99% of our then-outstanding shares of common stock.  The Amended Rights Plan also expanded the scope of the definition of “Acquiring Person” to include persons or groups that would be considered “5-percent shareholders” under Section 382 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, and the treasury regulations promulgated thereunder. Stockholders who beneficially owned 5% or more of our outstanding shares of common stock at the time of the amendment were exempt from the 4.99% threshold, subject to certain restrictions set forth in the Amended Rights Plan.
On February 8, 2011, AAM's Board of Directors approved a second amended and restated rights plan (Second Amended Rights Plan) to remove certain provisions that were added as part of the October 2009 amendment. The Second Amended Rights Plan, among other things, increases the beneficial ownership threshold at which a person or group becomes an “Acquiring Person” under the plan from 4.99% of the Company's then-outstanding shares of common stock, par value $0.01 per share, to 15% of the Company's then-outstanding shares of Common Stock. The Second Amended Rights Plan also narrows the scope of the definition of “Acquiring Person” to exclude the reference to persons or groups that would be considered “5-percent shareholders” under Section 382 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, and the related treasury regulations promulgated thereunder.
The Second Amended Rights Plan will automatically expire by its terms on September 15, 2013.

55

AMERICAN AXLE & MANUFACTURING HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

8.5.EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLANS
    
PENSION AND OTHER POSTRETIREMENT DEFINED BENEFIT PLANS We sponsor various qualified and non-qualified defined benefit pension plans for our eligible associates. We also maintain hourly and salaried benefit plans that provide postretirement medical, dental, vision legal and life insurance benefits (OPEB) to our eligible retirees and their dependents in the U.S.

As part of the 2009 SettlementAAM and Commercial Agreement, GM confirmed its obligation to share proportionally in the cost of OPEB for eligible retirees based on the length of service an employee had with AAM and GM.  We have included in our OPEB obligation the amounts expected to be received pursuant to this agreement of $270.6287.8 million and $254.4255.9 million at December 31, 20112014 and December 31, 20102013, respectively. We have also recorded a corresponding asset for these amounts on our Consolidated Balance Sheet, $10.413.3 million that is classified as a current asset and $260.2274.5 million that is classified as a noncurrent asset as of December 31, 20112014.

Actuarial valuations of our benefit plans were made as of December 31, 20112014 and 20102013. The principal weighted-average assumptions used in the year-end valuation of our U.S. and U.K. plans appear in the following table. The U.S. discount rates are based on an actuarial review of a hypothetical portfolio of long-term, high quality corporate bonds matched against the expected payment stream for each of our plans. The U.K. discount rate is based on a review of long-term bonds, in consideration of the average duration of plan liabilities. The assumptions for expected return on plan assets are based on future capital market expectations for the asset classes represented within our portfolios and a review of long-term historical returns. The rates of increase in compensation and health care costs are based on current market conditions, inflationary expectations and historical information.

Pension Benefits OPEBPension Benefits OPEB
2011 2010 2009 2011 2010 20092014 2013 2012 2014 2013 2012
U.S. U.K U.S. U.K U.S. U.K.      U.S. U.K U.S. U.K U.S. U.K.      
Discount rate5.10% 4.65% 5.70% 5.35% 6.10% 5.70% 5.10% 5.70% 6.00%4.10% 3.70% 5.00% 4.50% 4.10% 4.30% 4.15% 4.95% 4.05%
Expected return on plan assets8.00% 4.60% 8.00% 6.00% 8.00% 6.25% N/A
 N/A
 N/A
7.50% 5.00% 7.50% 5.15% 7.50% 4.35% N/A
 N/A
 N/A
Rate of compensation increase4.00% 3.25% 3.75% 3.65% 3.75% 3.75% 4.00% 3.75% 3.75%4.00% 3.30% 4.00% 3.60% 4.00% 3.15% 4.00% 4.00% 4.00%

5651



AMERICAN AXLE & MANUFACTURING HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)


The accumulated benefit obligation for all defined benefit pension plans was $706.2$723.9 million and $656.5$744.5 million at December 31, 20112014 and December 31, 2010,2013, respectively. As of December 31, 2014, the accumulated benefit obligation for our underfunded defined benefit pension plans was $586.5 million, the projected benefit obligation was $598.3 million and the fair value of assets for these plans was $496.3 million. The following table summarizes the changes in projected benefit obligations and plan assets and reconciles the funded status of the benefit plans, which is the net benefit plan liability:
Pension Benefits OPEBPension Benefits OPEB
December 31, December 31,December 31, December 31,
2011 2010 2011 20102014 2013 2014 2013
(in millions) (in millions)(in millions) (in millions)
Change in benefit obligation              
Benefit obligation at beginning of year$665.4
 $619.6
 $564.3
 $507.1
$755.4
 $842.8
 $577.9
 $601.3
Service cost4.8
 4.9
 0.9
 1.0
3.5
 3.4
 0.3
 0.4
Interest cost37.1
 36.8
 17.1
 16.1
36.1
 33.8
 15.3
 13.2
Plan amendments
 4.4
 
 

 
 
 (8.1)
Actuarial loss45.5
 35.3
 11.4
 25.4
Actuarial loss (gain)119.3
 (92.6) 41.2
 (0.7)
Change in GM portion of OPEB obligation
 
 16.2
 25.1

 
 31.8
 (17.0)
Participant contributions0.6
 0.7
 
 
0.4
 0.4
 
 
Curtailments(2.5) 0.1
 (10.0) 
Settlements(131.1) 
 
 
Benefit payments(33.7) (33.6) (11.5) (10.4)(36.5) (35.3) (11.8) (11.2)
Currency fluctuations(0.5) (2.8) 
 
(8.3) 2.9
 
 
Net change51.3
 45.8
 24.1
 57.2
(16.6) (87.4) 76.8
 (23.4)
Benefit obligation at end of year$716.7
 $665.4
 $588.4
 $564.3
$738.8
 $755.4
 $654.7
 $577.9
              
Change in plan assets              
Fair value of plan assets at beginning of year$412.4
 $358.7
 $
 $
$713.4
 $695.4
 $
 $
Actual return on plan assets11.0
 44.7
 
 
77.2
 49.2
 
 
Employer contributions52.0
 44.0
 11.5
 10.4
1.9
 0.8
 11.8
 11.2
Participant contributions0.6
 0.7
 
 
0.4
 0.4
 
 
Benefit payments(33.7) (33.6) (11.5) (10.4)(36.5) (35.3) (11.8) (11.2)
Settlements(104.2) 
 
 
Currency fluctuations(0.6) (2.1) 
 
(8.5) 2.9
 
 
Net change29.3
 53.7
 
 
(69.7) 18.0
 
 
Fair value of plan assets at end of year$441.7
 $412.4
 $
 $
$643.7
 $713.4
 $
 $

Amounts recognized inDuring 2014, the society of actuaries issued updated mortality tables for our balance sheets are as follows:U.S. benefit plans. These new mortality tables increased our projected benefit obligations for our U.S. pension and OPEB plans by $25.2 million and $19.0 million, respectively.

52

 Pension Benefits OPEB
 December 31, December 31,
 2011 2010 2011 2010
 (in millions) (in millions)
Current liabilities$(1.2) $(1.2) $(29.4) $(28.8)
Noncurrent liabilities(273.8) (251.8) (559.0) (535.5)
Net liability$(275.0) $(253.0) $(588.4) $(564.3)

57

AMERICAN AXLE & MANUFACTURING HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)


Amounts recognized in our balance sheets are as follows:

 Pension Benefits OPEB
 December 31, December 31,
 2014 2013 2014 2013
 (in millions) (in millions)
Noncurrent assets$6.9
 $9.3
 $
 $
Current liabilities(3.0) (2.3) (29.6) (30.8)
Noncurrent liabilities(99.0) (49.0) (625.1) (547.1)
Net liability$(95.1) $(42.0) $(654.7) $(577.9)

Pre-tax amounts recorded in AOCI,accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) (AOCI), not yet recognized in net periodic benefit cost (credit) as of December 31, 20112014 and 20102013, consists of:

Pension Benefits OPEBPension Benefits OPEB
December 31, December 31,December 31, December 31,
2011 2010 2011 20102014 2013 2014 2013
(in millions) (in millions)(in millions) (in millions)
Net actuarial gain (loss)$(230.3) $(171.2) $(1.8) $9.2
$(215.3) $(194.3) $(35.7) $4.9
Net prior service credit0.9
 1.0
 13.6
 28.8
0.7
 0.8
 15.4
 18.1
Deferred curtailment gain
 
 22.0
 
Total amounts recorded$(229.4) $(170.2) $33.8
 $38.0
$(214.6) $(193.5) $(20.3) $23.0

The components of net periodic benefit cost (credit) are as follows:

Pension Benefits OPEBPension Benefits OPEB
2011 2010 2009 2011 2010 20092014 2013 2012 2014 2013 2012
(in millions) (in millions)(in millions) (in millions)
Service cost$4.8
 $4.9
 $5.2
 $0.9
 $1.0
 $2.3
$3.5
 $3.4
 $3.1
 $0.3
 $0.4
 $0.4
Interest cost37.1
 36.8
 36.1
 17.1
 16.1
 17.8
36.1
 33.8
 35.1
 15.3
 13.2
 15.1
Expected asset return(31.9) (31.8) (30.4) 
 
 
(48.4) (45.8) (34.7) 
 
 
Amortized actuarial loss (gain)4.5
 2.5
 1.3
 0.4
 (1.4) (1.7)
Amortized prior service credit(0.1) 
 (0.1) (3.2) (3.1) (5.4)
Amortized actuarial loss5.4
 8.9
 7.8
 0.5
 0.9
 0.6
Amortized prior service cost (credit)(0.1) 5.4
 0.5
 (2.7) (1.8) (2.0)
Special and contractual                      
termination benefits
 
 2.5
 
 
 (0.7)
 
 12.8
 
 
 16.2
Curtailments
 0.2
 (1.5) 
 
 (68.0)
Settlement0.1
 
 0.4
 
 
 
Net periodic benefit cost (credit)$14.5
 $12.6
 $13.5
 $15.2
 $12.6
 $(55.7)
Curtailment gain
 
 
 
 
 (21.8)
Settlement charge (gain)35.5
 
 
 
 
 (5.2)
Net periodic benefit cost$32.0
 $5.7
 $24.6
 $13.4
 $12.7
 $3.3

Our postretirement cost sharing asset from GM is measured on the same basis as the portion of the obligation to which it relates. The actuarial gains and losses related to the GM portion of the OPEB obligation are recognized immediately in the Consolidated Statement of OperationsIncome as an offset against the gains and losses related to the change in the corresponding GM postretirement cost sharing asset. These items are presented net in the change in benefit obligation and net periodic benefit cost components disclosed above. Remaining actuarial gains and losses are deferred and amortized over the expected future service periods of the active participants.

53



AMERICAN AXLE & MANUFACTURING HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)


The estimated net actuarial loss and prior service credit for the defined benefit pension plans that is expected to be amortized from AOCI into net periodic benefit cost in 20122015 are $6.8$6.9 million and $0.1$0.1 million,, respectively. The estimated net actuarial loss and prior service credit for the other defined benefit postretirement plans that is expected to be amortized from AOCI into net periodic benefit cost in 20122015 are $0.6$0.7 million and $2.0$2.7 million,, respectively.

For measurement purposes, a weighted average annual increase in the per-capita cost of covered health care benefits of 8.5%7.0% was assumed for 20122015. The rate was assumed to decrease gradually to 5.0% by 20192023 and to remain at that level thereafter. Health care cost trend rates have a significant effect on the amounts reported for the health care plans. A 1.0% increase in the assumed health care cost trend rate would have increased total service and interest cost in 20112014 and the postretirement obligation, net of GM cost sharing, at December 31, 20112014 by $1.71.6 million and $35.941.3 million, respectively. A 1.0% decrease in the assumed health care cost trend rate would have decreased total service and interest cost in 20112014 and the postretirement obligation, net of GM cost sharing, at December 31, 20112014 by $1.51.3 million and $29.934.1 million, respectively.

58

AMERICAN AXLE & MANUFACTURING HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)


The expected future pension and other postretirement benefits to be paid, net of GM cost sharing, for each of the next five years and in the aggregate for the succeeding five years thereafter are as follows: $51.1$55.3 million in 2012; $52.9 million in 2013; $54.8 million in 2014; $56.4 million in 2015; $57.2$55.4 million in 20162016; $56.4 million in 2017; $56.6 million in 2018; $56.9 million in 2019 and $300.7$293.6 million for 20172020 through 2021.2024. These amounts were estimated using the same assumptions that were used to measure our 20112014 year-end pension and OPEB obligations and include an estimate of future employee service.

Contributions We currently estimateIn 2012, AAM and the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation entered into an agreement regarding any liability that may have arisen under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 in connection with the closures of DMC and CKMF. As part of this agreement, in 2012, we contributed $114.7 million in excess of our statutory minimum to our U.S. hourly pension plan.

Due to our significant pension contributions made in 2012, we do not expect to make any cash payments in 2015 to satisfy our regulatory pension funding requirements in 2012 to be approximately $35 million.requirements. We expect our cash outlay, net of GM cost sharing, for OPEB to be approximately $16 million. in 2015.

Attrition and separation programsLabor relations In 2009,2012, we completed multiple valuationsrecorded a gain of$21.8 million in cost of goods sold for the curtailment of certain OPEB. This resulted primarily from the reduction in expected future OPEB related to the DMC and CKMF hourly associates who have terminated employment from AAM as a result of our plant closures. These curtailment gains resulted in an increase in our accumulated other comprehensive loss of $21.8 million pre-tax.

Also in 2012, we notified hourly associates of the termination of a benefit plan, which provided legal services to certain eligible hourly associates represented by the International UAW. As a result of terminating this plan, we recorded a settlement gain of $5.2 million in cost of goods sold in 2012. Recognition of this settlement gain reduced postretirement benefits and other long-term liabilities by $4.7 million and also reduced our accumulated other comprehensive loss by $0.5 million pre-tax.

Terminated vested lump sum payout offer On September 22, 2014, we announced a plan to offer a voluntary one-time lump sum payment option to certain eligible terminated vested participants in our U.S. pension plans that, if accepted, would settle our pension obligations to them (“AAM Pension Payout Offer”). The lump sum settlements, which were paid from plan assets, reduced our liabilities and administrative costs going forward.

The AAM Pension Payout Offer was open from October 2, 2014 through November 12, 2014 to approximately 6,000 of our 14,000 total U.S. pension plan participants. In addition to the lump sum payment option, the AAM Pension Payout Offer allowed participants to commence payment of their monthly benefits early.

In total, 3,335 participants accepted the offer and we made a one-time lump sum payment from our pension trust of $104.2 million on December 19, 2014. As a result of this settlement, we remeasured the assets and liabilities of our U.S. pension plans, which reduced our projected benefit obligation by $131.1 million and resulted in a non-cash charge of $35.5 million in the fourth quarter of 2014 related to the accelerated recognition of certain deferred losses.

54



AMERICAN AXLE & MANUFACTURING HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)


Amendments to pension and OPEB plans.  Weplans and contractual termination benefits In the third quarter of 2013, we remeasured the AAM Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan (SERP) due to the passing of our Co-Founder and former Executive Chairman of the Board of Directors. As a result of this remeasurement, we recorded $4.7 million in selling, general and administrative expense related to the acceleration of prior service cost.

As a net gainresult of our election to apply the provisions of Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century Act (MAP-21), in addition to certain actions we took in 2012, we agreed to provide pension and postretirement benefits to certain eligible UAW associates whose employment had been terminated in connection with the DMC and CKMF plant closures. In 2012, we recorded $69.528.7 million in cost of goods sold, for the curtailment of certainthese pension and otherpostretirement benefits. These incremental pension and postretirement benefits were also agreed to in 2009.  These curtailments relate primarily to UAW-represented associates who participated in attrition programs in 2008 but did not terminate employment with AAM until 2009, UAW-represented associates who terminated employment in 2009 by electing to accelerate their remaining buydown payments and a reduction in our salaried workforce.  In addition, we recorded expense of $1.8 million for special termination benefits in 2009.  This charge primarily relates to the voluntary salaried retirement incentive program benefits paid under our pension plans, net of an adjustment resulting from the closing agreement we signedconnection with the lawsuit filed by the International Association of Machinists in the second quarter of 2009.   UAW against AAM. See Note 9 - Commitments and Contingencies for more detail on this lawsuit.

Pension plan assets The weighted-average asset allocations of our pension plan assets at December 31, 20112014 and 20102013 appear in the following table. The asset allocation for our plans is developed in consideration of the demographics of the plan participants and expected payment stream of the benefit obligation.

U.S. U.K.U.S. U.K.
  Target   Target  Target   Target
2011 2010 Allocation 2011 2010 Allocation2014 2013 Allocation 2014 2013 Allocation
Equity securities50.8% 51.6% 50% 44.5% 50.5% 45% - 55%33.1% 42.5% 30% - 65% 28.7% 30.7% 25% - 35%
Fixed income securities35.5
 32.8
 30% - 35%
 47.9
 44.3
 45% - 55%47.3
 48.5
 35% - 55% 61.1
 59.0
 55% - 65%
Hedge funds13.5
 11.0
 0% - 15%
 
 
 0%18.3
 8.8
 0% - 20% 10.1
 10.2
 5% - 15%
Cash0.2
 4.6
 0% - 5%
 7.6
 5.2
 0% - 5%1.3
 0.2
 0% - 5% 0.1
 0.1
 0% - 5%
Total100.0% 100.0%   100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 

The primary objective of our pension plan assets is to provide a source of retirement income for participants and beneficiaries. Our primary financial objectives for the pension plan assets have been established in conjunction with a comprehensive review of our current and projected financial requirements. These objectives include having the ability to pay all future benefits and expenses when due, maintaining flexibility and minimizing volatility. These objectives are based on a long-term investment horizon.

5955



AMERICAN AXLE & MANUFACTURING HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)


Postretirement Benefit Plan AssetsInvestments in our defined benefit plans are stated at fair value. Level 1 assets are valued using quoted market prices that represent the asset value of the shares held by the trusts. The level 2 assets are investments in pooled funds, which are valued using a model to reflect the valuation of their underlying assets that are publicly traded with observable values. The fair value of our level 3 postretirement benefit plan assets are measured by compiling the portfolio holdings and independently valuing the securities in those portfolios. The fair values of our pension plan assets are as follows:

December 31, 2011        
December 31, 2014        
Asset Categories Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Total Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Total
 (in millions) (in millions)
Cash & Cash Equivalents $8.0
 $
 $
 $8.0
 $6.7
 $
 $
 $6.7
Equity                
U.S. Large Cap 88.6
 
 
 88.6
 87.3
 
 
 87.3
U.S. Small/Mid Cap 43.5
 
 
 43.5
 25.2
 
 
 25.2
World Equity 65.3
 20.6
 
 85.9
 94.2
 
 
 94.2
Fixed Income Securities                
Government & Agencies 56.6
 
 
 56.6
 67.9
 58.8
 
 126.7
Corporate Bonds - Investment Grade 68.5
 
 
 68.5
 139.9
 
 
 139.9
Corporate Bonds - Non-investment Grade 25.3
 
 
 25.3
 31.9
 
 
 31.9
Emerging Market Debt 11.8
 
 
 11.8
 19.0
 
 
 19.0
Other 7.0
 
 
 7.0
 7.2
 
 
 7.2
Hedge Funds                
Property Funds 
 
 48.3
 48.3
Multi Strategy Hedge Fund 
 
 46.5
 46.5
 
 
 57.3
 57.3
Total Plan Assets $374.6
 $20.6
 $46.5
 $441.7
 $479.3
 $58.8
 $105.6
 $643.7
                
December 31, 2010        
        
December 31, 2013        
Asset Categories Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Total Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Total
 (in millions) (in millions)
Cash & Cash Equivalents $19.5
 $
 $
 $19.5
 $1.5
 $
 $
 $1.5
Equity                
U.S. Large Cap 68.2
 2.6
 
 70.8
 128.0
 
 
 128.0
U.S. Small/Mid Cap 45.0
 4.3
 
 49.3
 49.4
 
 
 49.4
World Equity 54.6
 37.2
 
 91.8
 109.3
 
 
 109.3
Fixed Income Securities                
Government & Agencies 44.1
 
 
 44.1
 70.5
 63.0
 
 133.5
Corporate Bonds - Investment Grade 59.8
 
 
 59.8
 167.1
 
 
 167.1
Corporate Bonds - Non-investment Grade 28.5
 
 
 28.5
 25.8
 
 
 25.8
Emerging Market Debt 9.0
 
 
 9.0
 17.4
 
 
 17.4
Other 3.9
 
 
 3.9
 16.9
 
 
 16.9
Hedge Funds                
Property Funds 
 
 7.1
 7.1
Multi Strategy Hedge Fund 
 
 35.7
 35.7
 
 
 57.4
 57.4
Total Plan Assets $332.6
 $44.1
 $35.7
 $412.4
 $585.9
 $63.0
 $64.5
 $713.4

6056



AMERICAN AXLE & MANUFACTURING HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)


The changes in the fair value of our level 3 assets in the Property Funds and Multi Strategy Hedge Fund are as follows:

December 31,December 31,
2011 20102014 2013
(in millions)(in millions)
Beginning balance$35.7
 $35.3
$64.5
 $47.6
Actual return on plan assets:      
Relating to assets still held at the reporting date(0.5) 0.4
3.3
 3.5
Purchases, sales and settlements, net11.3
 
37.8
 13.4
Ending balance$46.5
 $35.7
$105.6
 $64.5

DEFINED CONTRIBUTION PLANS Most of our salaried U.S. associates are eligible to participate in voluntary savings plans. Our maximum match is 50% of eligible salaried associates' contribution up to 10% of their eligible salary. Matching contributions amounted to $3.23.9 million in 20112014, $3.13.9 million in 20102013 and $3.3 million in 20092012. U.S. salaried associates are eligible to receive an additional annual retirement contribution (ARC) benefit between 3% to 5% of eligible salary, depending on years of service. We made ARC contributions of $3.64.9 million, $3.54.6 million and $2.94.4 million in 20112014, 20102013 and 20092012, respectively, for the ARC.respectively.

As part of the 2008 labor agreements, certainCertain UAW represented associates at our original U.S. locations are eligible for a Company match on associate contributions made to the voluntary savings plans, which began in 2009.plans. Our maximum match will beis 25% of hourly associates' contribution up to the first 6% of their contributions. Matching contributions amounted to $0.2 million in both 2011 and 2010 and $0.40.1 million in 20092014, 2013 and 2012. Certain UAW represented associates are also eligible to receive an ARC benefit of 5% of eligible wages, which also began in 2009. We made ARC contributions of$2.6 million in 2014, $1.9 million in 20112013 and $1.81.6 million in both 20102012 and 2009 for the ARC related to these associates.

DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN Certain U.S. associates are eligible to participate in a non-qualified deferred compensation plan. Payments of $1.11.2 million, $1.66.1 million and $1.40.8 million have been made in 20112014, 20102013 and 20092012, respectively, to eligible associates that have elected distributions. Included in these payments, in 2013, was a distribution of $5.6 million to the beneficiary of the plan upon the passing of our Co-Founder and former Executive Chairman of the Board of Directors. This payment resulted in a $5.6 million reduction in postretirement benefits and other long-term liabilities on our Consolidated Balance Sheet and was partially offset by proceeds of $5.0 million, which AAM received as the beneficiary of a key man life insurance policy in 2013.
At December 31, 20112014 and 20102013, our deferred compensation liability was $10.65.6 million and $11.26.2 million, respectively. Due to the changes in the value of this deferred compensation plan we increased our liability by $0.3 million, $0.8 million and $1.3 million in $0.3 million2014, $1.1 million2013, and $2.0 million2012 in 2011, 2010 and 2009,, respectively.


6157



AMERICAN AXLE & MANUFACTURING HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)


9.6.STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION

At December 31, 20112014, we havehad grants outstanding under stock incentive compensation plans approved by our stockholders. Under these plans, a total of 19.118.5 million shares have been authorized for issuance to our directors, officers and certain other associates in the form of options, unvested restricted stock or other awards that are based on the value of our common stock. The 1999 stock incentive compensation plan expired in January 2009. The Company has no sharesShares available for future grants at December 31, 20112014. were 2.2 million. The current stock plan will expire in April 2022.

STOCK OPTIONS Under the terms of the plans, stock options are granted at the market price of the stock on the grant date. The contractual term of outstanding stock options is 10 years.years. We issue new shares to satisfy stock-based awards.

Stock option awards become exercisable in three approximately equal annual installments beginning one year from the date of grant.

The following table summarizes activity relating to our stock options:

   Weighted-   Weighted-
Number of  Average ExerciseNumber of  Average Exercise
Shares Price Per ShareShares Price Per Share
(in millions, except per share data)(in millions, except per share data)
Outstanding at January 1, 20096.0
 $23.57
Outstanding at January 1, 20123.9
 $26.95
Options granted0.1
 2.81
0.2
 9.19
Options exercised(0.2) 4.26
(0.1) 2.81
Options canceled(0.3) 22.84
(1.0) 25.12
Outstanding at December 31, 20095.6
 $23.96
Outstanding at December 31, 20123.0
 $27.08
Options granted
 

 
Options exercised(0.2) 6.94
(0.1) 10.59
Options canceled(0.4) 17.37
(0.9) 24.28
Outstanding at December 31, 20105.0
 $25.01
Outstanding at December 31, 20132.0
 $29.22
Options granted
 

 
Options exercised(0.5) 8.69
(0.1) 13.87
Options canceled(0.6) 26.96
(1.0) 37.70
Outstanding at December 31, 20113.9
 $26.95
Outstanding at December 31, 20140.9
 $20.66
      
Exercisable at December 31, 20095.1
 $25.05
Exercisable at December 31, 20104.8
 $25.75
Exercisable at December 31, 20113.8
 $27.25
Exercisable at December 31, 20122.8
 $28.02
Exercisable at December 31, 20132.0
 $29.22
Exercisable at December 31, 20140.9
 $20.66

As of December 31, 20112014, there iswere no unrecognized compensation cost related to unvested stock options. The total intrinsic value of options outstanding as of December 31, 2011 was $0.4 million. There was no intrinsic value of optionsand exercisable as of December 31, 20112014 was $3.4 million. The total intrinsic value of stock options exercised was $3.00.5 million in 2011 and2014, $0.8 million in 2010.2013 and $0.5 million in 2012.

6258



AMERICAN AXLE & MANUFACTURING HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)


The following is a summary of the range of exercise prices for stock options that are outstanding and exercisable at December 31, 20112014:

    Weighted-     Weighted-
Range of Stock Options Average Exercise Weighted-Average Stock Options Average Exercise
Exercise Prices Outstanding Price Per Share Contractual Life Exercisable Price Per Share
  (in millions, except per share data)  (in years) (in millions, except per share data)
$2.81 0.1
 $2.81
 7.0
 
 $
$10.08 - $15.58 0.4
 14.22
 4.8
 0.4
 14.22
$19.54 - $23.73 0.9
 23.64
 1.1
 0.9
 23.64
$24.15 - $27.00 1.4
 25.03
 1.8
 1.4
 25.03
$32.13 - $40.83 1.1
 38.54
 2.1
 1.1
 38.54
  3.9
 $26.95
 2.1
 3.8
 $27.25
    Weighted-     Weighted-
Range of Stock Options Average Exercise Weighted-Average Stock Options Average Exercise
Exercise Prices Outstanding Price Per Share Contractual Life Exercisable Price Per Share
  (in millions, except per share data)  (in years) (in millions, except per share data)
$9.19 - $15.58 0.4
 $13.22
 3.2 0.4
 $13.22
$19.54 - $26.65 0.5
 26.05
 1.2 0.5
 26.05
  0.9
 $20.66
 2.0 0.9
 $20.66

We estimated the fair value of our employee stock options on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model with the following assumptions:

 2009
Expected volatility64.32%
Risk-free interest rate2.07%
Dividend yield2.85%
Expected life of options8 years
Weighted-average grant-date fair value$1.40

Expected volatility was based on the daily changes in our historical common stock prices over a period equal to the expected life of the award. The risk-free rate is based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at the time of the grant corresponding to the expected life of the options. Our dividend yield is based on the dividend at the time of grant. The expected life of options is based on historical stock option exercise patterns and the terms of the options.

OTHER STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION We awarded performance accelerated restricted stock, restricted stock and restricted stock units (PARS, RS and RSUs, respectively). The total amount of compensation expense associated with the RSUs settled in cash is recorded as an accrued liability when incurred while the total amount of compensation expense associated with PARS, RS and RSRSUs settled in stock is recorded to paid-in-capital. The PARS and RSUs vest over three to five years contingent upon the satisfaction of future financial performance targets specified by the plan and the RS vests over three years. The unearned compensation is expensed over the expected vesting period.

The following table summarizes activity relating to our PARS, RS and RSUs:
   Weighted Average
 Number of Grant Date Fair
 Shares/Units Value per Share/Unit
 (in millions, except per share data)
Outstanding at January 1, 20121.6
 $10.74
    Granted1.0
 10.31
    Vested(1.4) 10.19
    Canceled(0.1) 26.02
Outstanding at December 31, 20121.1
 $11.08
    Granted0.9
 12.79
    Vested(0.7) 11.06
    Canceled
 
Outstanding at December 31, 20131.3
 $12.24
    Granted0.5
 19.58
    Vested(0.1) 13.95
    Canceled(0.1) 12.76
Outstanding at December 31, 20141.6
 $14.54

As of December 31, 2014, unrecognized compensation cost related to unvested RSUs totaled $10.4 million. The weighted average period over which this cost is expected to be recognized is approximately one year. In 2014 and 2013, the total fair market value of RS and RSUs vested was $1.7 million and $13.8 million, respectively.

We made cash payments of $0.2 million related to vested RSUs in 2012.

6359



AMERICAN AXLE & MANUFACTURING HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)


PERFORMANCE SHARES As of December 31, 2014, we have performance shares (PS) outstanding under our 2012 Omnibus Incentive Plan. We granted performance shares payable in stock to officers which vest in full over a three-year performance period. The payout of these stock-based awards is based equally on a total shareholder return (TSR) measure and AAM's three-year earnings before interest, taxes and depreciation and amortization margin (EBITDA). The TSR metric compares our TSR over the three-year performance period relative to the TSR of our pre-defined competitor peer group. Share price appreciation and dividends paid are measured over the performance period to determine TSR. As these awards are settled in stock, the compensation expense booked ratably over the vesting period is recorded to paid-in-capital.

The following table summarizes activity relating to our PARS, RS and RSUs:

performance shares:
  Weighted Average  Weighted Average
Number of Grant Date FairNumber of Grant Date Fair
Shares/Units Value per Share/UnitShares Value per Share
(in millions, except per share data)
Outstanding at January 1, 20092.9
 $21.17
EBITDA(in millions, except per share data)
Outstanding at January 1, 2014
 $
Granted1.3
 2.81
0.2
 27.66
Vested(0.7) 18.36

 
Canceled(0.2) 19.78

 
Outstanding at December 31, 20093.3
 $14.77
Outstanding at December 31, 20140.2
 $27.66
TSR   
Outstanding at January 1, 2014
 $
Granted
 
0.2
 21.11
Vested(0.4) 23.42

 
Canceled(0.1) 14.54

 
Outstanding at December 31, 20102.8
 $13.48
Granted
 
Vested(1.1) 17.41
Canceled(0.1) 10.68
Outstanding at December 31, 20111.6
 $10.74
Outstanding at December 31, 20140.2
 $21.11

We estimated the fair value of our performance shares related to EBITDA on the date of grant using our estimated three-year EBITDA margin, based on AAM's budget and long-range plan assumptions at that time. We estimated the fair value of our performance shares related to TSR on the date of grant using the Monte Carlo simulation approach. The Monte Carlo simulation approach utilizes inputs on volatility assumptions, risk free rates, the price of the Company’s and our competitor peer group's common stock and their correlation as of each valuation date. Volatility assumptions are based on historical and implied volatility measurements.

As of December 31, 2011,Based on the current fair value, the estimated unrecognized compensation cost related to unvested PARS, RS and RSUsPS totaled $5.3 million, as of $0.4 millionDecember 31, 2014. The weighted average period over which this cost is expected to be recognized is less than one year. In 2011 and 2010, the total fair market value of PARS, RS and RSUs vested was $15.5 million and $4.2 million, respectively.
We made cash payments of $0.4 million, $1.2 million and $0.1 million related to vested RSUs in 2011, 2010 and 2009, respectively.approximately two years.

PERFORMANCE AWARDS As of December 31, 20112014, we have performance awards outstanding under our AAM 2009 long-term incentive plan.2012 Omnibus Incentive Plan, which are fully vested. We granted performance awards payable in cash to our officers and executives which vest in full over a three year performance period. The payout of these awards is based on a total shareholder return (TSR)TSR measure that compares our TSR over the three-year performance period relative to the TSR of our pre-defined competitor peer group. Share price appreciation and dividends paid is measured over the performance period to determine TSR.

According to the applicable accounting guidance, these awards are considered to be stock-based compensation because the final payout amount is based “at least in part” on the price of our shares. AsHowever, as these awards are settled in cash, they are determined to be liability awards and will behave been remeasured at the end of each reporting period until settlement. The fair value of the performance awards iswas calculated on a quarterly basis using the Monte Carlo simulation approach, described above, and the liability iswas adjusted accordingly based on changes to the fair value and the percentage of time vested. The Monte Carlo simulation approach utilizes inputs on volatility assumptions, risk free rates, the price of the Company’s and our peer group's common stock and their correlation as of each valuation date. Volatility assumptions are based on historical and implied volatility measurements.

60

We recognized compensation expense associated with the performance awards of approximately $3.5 million in 2011, $1.6 million in 2010 and $1.1 million in 2009. We have a liability of $5.8 million recorded as of December 31, 2011. Based on the current fair value, the estimated unrecognized compensation cost related to the performance awards totaled $2.5 million, as of December 31, 2011. The weighted average period over which this cost is expected to be recognized is approximately eighteen months.

64

AMERICAN AXLE & MANUFACTURING HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)


We recognized compensation expense associated with the performance awards of approximately $1.4 million in 2014, $7.9 million in 2013 and $3.0 million in 2012. We have a liability of $3.7 million recorded as of December 31, 2014, which will be paid out in the first quarter of 2015. As of December 31, 2014, there is no unrecognized compensation cost related to the performance awards.

10.7.INCOME TAXES

Income (loss) before income taxes for U.S. and non-U.S. operations was as follows:
2011 2010 20092014 2013 2012
(in millions)(in millions)
U.S. income (loss)$20.3
 $(13.4) $(364.0)$12.0
 $(23.8) $(6.0)
Non - U.S. income117.8
 132.2
 66.9
164.7
 110.1
 37.5
Total income (loss) before income taxes$138.1
 $118.8
 $(297.1)
Total income before income taxes$176.7
 $86.3
 $31.5

The following is a summary of the components of our provisions for income taxes:

2011 2010 20092014 2013 2012
(in millions)(in millions)
Current          
Federal$(24.7) $6.0
 $6.0
$0.6
 $(1.3) $(3.3)
Other state and local(0.2) 1.4
 0.5
0.1
 0.1
 1.1
Foreign9.9
 5.5
 17.3
44.2
 12.1
 10.2
Total current$(15.0) $12.9
 $23.8
$44.9
 $10.9
 $8.0
          
Deferred          
Federal$22.3
 $(6.0) $(64.7)$(11.6) $(9.3) $(347.1)
Other state and local(1.4) 0.5
 (0.6)
Foreign(4.9) (3.1) (2.3)0.4
 (9.8) 3.9
Total deferred16.0
 (8.6) (67.6)(11.2) (19.1) (343.2)
Total income tax expense (benefit)$1.0
 $4.3
 $(43.8)$33.7
 $(8.2) $(335.2)

The following is a reconciliation of our provision for income taxes to the expected amounts using statutory rates:

 2011 2010 2009
Federal statutory35.0 % 35.0 % 35.0 %
Foreign income taxes(34.6) (42.9) 11.6
State and local(1.2) 1.6
 0.1
Valuation allowance(30.7) (39.3) (10.2)
U.S. tax on unremitted foreign earnings26.3
 49.6
 (33.2)
NOL carryback refund
 
 16.4
Other5.9
 (0.4) (5.0)
Effective income tax rate0.7 % 3.6 % 14.7 %

Our income tax expense and effective tax rate for 2011 reflects the effect of recognizing a net operating loss (NOL) benefit against our taxable income in the U.S. Our income tax expense for 2011 also reflects net tax benefits of $4.5 million relating to the favorable resolution of income tax audits in the U.S. and the impacts of changes in tax laws in Michigan and Brazil.

Our income tax expense and effective tax rate for 2010 reflects the effect of recognizing a net operating loss (NOL) benefit against our taxable income in the U.S. In conjunction with the filing of our 2009 federal tax return, under provisions contained in the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009, we recorded a tax benefit of $1.4 million in 2010 attributable to the monetization of alternative minimum tax and research and development credits.  We received this tax refund during the fourth quarter of 2010.
 2014 2013 2012
Federal statutory35.0 % 35.0 % 35.0 %
Foreign income taxes(25.1) (48.5) (85.0)
Change in enacted tax rate
 (9.9) 
State and local0.1
 0.2
 3.5
Tax Credits(11.4) 
 
Valuation allowance4.5
 12.4
 (985.0)
U.S. tax on unremitted foreign earnings1.9
 (0.2) (29.5)
Uncertain tax positions13.0
 (0.5) (5.2)
Other1.1
 2.0
 2.0
Effective income tax rate19.1 % (9.5)% (1,064.2)%


6561



AMERICAN AXLE & MANUFACTURING HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

Our income tax expense and effective tax rate for 2014 and 2013 primarily reflect favorable foreign tax rates, along with our inability to realize a tax benefit for current foreign losses. In 2014, we recorded tax expense of $23.1 million for changes to prior year uncertain tax positions related to transfer pricing and expense of $3.4 million for a change in estimate for U.S. tax on unremitted foreign earnings. We also recorded a net tax benefit of $20.1 million in 2014 related to our ability to utilize tax credits in future periods resulting in the recognition of a deferred tax asset.

TheIn 2013, new Mexican tax reform was enacted that, among other things, increased the tax rate related to Maquiladora Companies from 17.5% to 30%. We recorded a tax benefit of $8.5 million as a result of revaluing our deferred tax assets at the newly enacted rate. In 2013, we recorded tax expense of $4.8 million relating to changes in estimates in the U.S. and certain foreign jurisdictions. Our income tax benefit and effective tax rate for 20092013 also reflects the effectimpact of recording a tax benefit of $48.81.5 million relating to the release of a prior year unrecognized tax benefit due to the expiration of the applicable statute of limitations and a tax benefit of $3.3 million relating to an election we made in 2013 regarding the treatment of foreign exchange gains and losses in a foreign jurisdiction. During 2013, we also settled various income tax audits resulting in a reduction of our liability for unrecognized income tax benefits of $8.4 million and a cash payment of $4.7 million.

In 2012, our business returned to a position of cumulative profitability on a pre-tax basis, considering our operating results for the three years ended December 31, 2012. We concluded that this record of cumulative profitability in recent years, in addition to the restructuring of our U.S. operations and our long range forecast showing continued profitability, provided sufficient positive evidence that our net U.S. federal tax benefits more likely than not would be realized. Accordingly, in 2012, we released the valuation allowance against our net federal deferred assets for entities in the U.S., resulting in a $337.5 million benefit in our 2012 provision for income taxes. Our income tax benefit and effective tax rate in 2012 reflect the impact of this valuation allowance reversal. Our income tax expense and effective tax rate for 2012 also reflect a net tax expense of $1.3 million related to the extensionamendment of state income tax returns as a result of the carryback periodsettlement of our 2008 NOL and recording a valuation allowance againstfederal income tax benefits on losses inaudits for the U.S. and certain foreign subsidiaries. In 2009, we also established a deferred tax liability of $118.8 million which represented the estimated tax impact of the undistributed earnings of certain foreign subsidiaries as we believed these accumulated foreign earnings in certain jurisdictions were likely to be remitted to the U.S. as dividends or intercompany loans.years 2004 through 2007.

As of December 31, 20112014 and 20102013, we have refundable income taxes of $3.55.6 million and $5.94.9 million, respectively, classified as prepaid expenses and other on our Consolidated Balance Sheet. We also have income taxes payable of $4.13.0 million and $0.32.6 million classified as other accrued expenses on our Consolidated Balance Sheet as of December 31, 20112014 and 20102013, respectively. As of December 31, 2014 and 2013, we have accrued value added tax payable of $36.1 million and $38.3 million, respectively, classified as other accrued expenses on our Consolidated Balance Sheet.

The following is a summary of the significant components of our deferred tax assets and liabilities:

December 31,December 31,
2011 20102014 2013
(in millions)(in millions)
Current deferred tax assets      
Employee benefits$15.3
 $14.8
$26.0
 $14.5
Inventory6.4
 7.7
7.5
 8.0
Deferred revenue
 22.7
Prepaid taxes and other11.8
 6.4
16.9
 24.6
Valuation allowance(21.9) (41.2)(10.2) (10.7)
Total current deferred tax assets$11.6
 $10.4
$40.2
 $36.4
      
Current deferred tax liabilities      
Unrealized foreign exchange gain and other(10.2) (11.3)(0.1) (0.1)
Current deferred tax asset (liability), net$1.4
 $(0.9)
Current deferred tax asset, net$40.1
 $36.3


62



AMERICAN AXLE & MANUFACTURING HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

Current deferred tax assets and liabilities recognized in our Consolidated Balance Sheets are as follows:

 December 31,
 2011 2010
 (in millions)
    
U.S. federal and state deferred tax asset, net$
 $
Other foreign deferred tax asset (liability), net1.4
 (0.9)
Current deferred tax asset (liability), net$1.4
 $(0.9)
 December 31,
 2014 2013
 (in millions)
    
U.S. federal and state deferred tax asset, net$27.0
 $17.1
Other foreign deferred tax asset, net13.1
 19.2
Current deferred tax asset, net$40.1
 $36.3

66

AMERICAN AXLE & MANUFACTURING HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)


The following is a summary of the significant components of our noncurrent deferred tax assets and liabilities:
December 31,December 31,
2011 20102014 2013
(in millions)(in millions)
Noncurrent deferred tax assets      
Employee benefits$222.0
 $235.1
$193.9
 $161.5
NOL carryforwards109.0
 152.1
Net operating loss (NOL) carryforwards104.7
 176.9
Tax credit carryforwards60.0
 101.9
69.8
 82.9
Capital allowance carryforwards21.1
 22.7
14.4
 16.0
Fixed assets
 30.5
6.6
 10.3
Deferred revenue30.1
 34.8
12.6
 15.7
Capitalized expenditures78.8
 62.8
111.2
 113.6
Other11.7
 9.4
2.3
 2.9
Valuation allowances(405.0) (519.7)(146.7) (153.0)
Noncurrent deferred tax assets127.7
 129.6
368.8
 426.8
Noncurrent deferred tax liabilities      
U.S. tax on unremitted foreign earnings(105.6) (91.0)
 (85.0)
Fixed assets and other(9.7) (6.6)(9.1) (9.8)
Noncurrent deferred tax asset, net$12.4
 $32.0
$359.7
 $332.0

Noncurrent deferred tax assets and liabilities recognized in our Consolidated Balance Sheets are as follows:

December 31,December 31,
2011 20102014 2013
(in millions)(in millions)
U.S. federal and state deferred tax asset, net$6.9
 $27.7
$362.2
 $337.2
Other foreign deferred tax asset, net5.5
 4.3
Other foreign deferred tax asset (liability), net(2.5) (5.2)
Noncurrent deferred tax asset, net$12.4
 $32.0
$359.7
 $332.0
 

63



AMERICAN AXLE & MANUFACTURING HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)


DEFERRED INCOME TAX ASSETS AND LIABILITIES AND VALUATION ALLOWANCES The deferred income tax assets and liabilities previously summarized reflect the impact of temporary differences between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities for financial reporting purposes and the basis of such assets and liabilities as measured by tax laws. As of December 31, 20112014 and December 31, 20102013, we had deferred tax assets from domestic and foreign NOL and tax credit carryforwards of $190.1$188.9 million and $276.7$275.8 million,, respectively. Approximately $69.4$85.6 million of the deferred tax assets at December 31, 20112014 relate to NOL carryforwards or tax credits that can be carried forward indefinitely with the remainder having carryover periods of 45 to 20 years. The deferred tax asset relating to U.S. net operating losses and tax credit carryforwards as of December 31, 2014 is lower than the actual amount reported and expected to be reported on our U.S. tax returns by $3.2 million. This difference is the result of tax deductions in excess of financial statement amounts for stock based compensation. When this amount is realized, we will record a credit to additional paid in capital and reduce our income taxes payable.

Accounting guidance for income taxes requires a deferred tax liability be established for the U.S. tax impact of undistributed earnings of foreign subsidiaries unless it can be shown that these earnings will be permanently reinvested outside the U.S. We believe these accumulated foreign earnings in certain jurisdictions are likely to be remitted to the U.S. as dividends or intercompany loans andDeferred income taxes have established a deferred tax liabilitynot been provided on $502.2 million of$105.6 million and $91.0 million as of December 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively, which represents the estimated tax impact of the undistributed earnings of certain foreign subsidiaries.subsidiaries as such amounts are considered permanently reinvested. The remittance of these undistributed earnings may subject us to U.S. income taxes and certain foreign withholding taxes at the time of remittance.remittance, however, the determination of the amount of unrecognized deferred tax liability relating to the remittance of undistributed earnings is not practicable.

In accordance with the accounting guidance for income taxes, we estimate whether recoverability of our deferred tax assets is “more likely than not,” based on forecasts of taxable income in the related tax jurisdictions.  In this estimate, we use historical results, projected future operating results based upon approved business plans, eligible carry forward periods, tax planning opportunities and other relevant considerations.  
 

67

AMERICAN AXLE & MANUFACTURING HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

AtAs described above, in 2012, we released the valuation allowance against our net federal deferred tax assets for entities in the United States, resulting in a $337.5 million benefit in our 2012 provision for income taxes. As of December 31, 2014 and December 31, 20112013, ourwe have a valuation allowance wasof $426.9156.9 million comparedand $163.7 million, respectively, related to $560.9 million at December 31, 2010.

If, in the future, we generate taxable income on a sustained basis in the U.S. or in foreign jurisdictions for which we have recorded valuation allowances, our current estimate of the recoverability of ournet deferred tax assets could changein several foreign jurisdictions and result in the future reversal of some or all of the valuation allowances.U.S. state and local jurisdictions.

UNRECOGNIZED INCOME TAX BENEFITS To the extent our uncertain tax positions do not meet the “more likely than not” threshold, we have derecognized such positions. To the extent our uncertain tax positions meet the “more likely than not” threshold, we have measured and recorded the highest probable benefit, and have established appropriate reserves for benefits that exceed the amount likely to be sustained upon examination.

64



AMERICAN AXLE & MANUFACTURING HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)


A reconciliation of the beginning and ending amounts of unrecognized income tax benefits is as follows:
Unrecognized Income Tax Interest andUnrecognized Income Tax Interest and
Benefits PenaltiesBenefits Penalties
(in millions)(in millions)
Balance at January 1, 2009$40.6
 $5.2
Increase in prior year tax positions0.5
 4.1
Decrease in prior year tax positions(1.2) 
Increase in current year tax positions0.7
 6.0
Balance at December 31, 2009$40.6
 $15.3
Balance at January 1, 2012$25.8
 $7.4
Increase in prior year tax positions6.2
 6.1

 2.8
Decrease in prior year tax positions(0.2) 
(1.1) 
Increase in current year tax positions1.0
 0.3
0.4
 
Settlement
 (0.3)(4.4) 
Balance at December 31, 2010$47.6
 $21.4
Balance at December 31, 2012$20.7
 $10.2
Increase in prior year tax positions
 1.0
6.1
 0.1
Decrease in prior year tax positions(0.8) (2.3)(4.4) (6.2)
Increase in current year tax positions1.3
 
4.0
 
Settlement(22.3) (12.7)(4.7) 
Balance at December 31, 2011$25.8
 $7.4
Balance at December 31, 2013$21.7
 $4.1
Increase in prior year tax positions10.5
 8.1
Decrease in prior year tax positions(0.5) 
Increase in current year tax positions15.6
 
Balance at December 31, 2014$47.3
 $12.2

At December 31, 20112014 and December 31, 20102013, we had $25.847.3 million and $47.621.7 million of net unrecognized income tax benefits, respectively. Included inChanges to prior and current year tax positions for the balance at year ended December 31, 2010 was $17.4 million for which2014 relate primarily to transfer pricing, income tax credits and the ultimate deductibility was highly certain but for which there is uncertainty about the timingeffect of such deductibility. Because of the impact of deferred tax accounting, other than interest and penalties, the disallowance of the shorter deductibility period would not affect the annual effective tax rate but would accelerate the payment of cash to the taxing authority to an earlier period.changes in exchange rates.

In 2011201420102013, and 20092012, we recognized a benefitexpense of $1.38.1 millionexpensebenefit of $6.1 million and expense of $10.12.8 million, respectively, ofrelated to interest and penalties in income tax expense (benefit) on our Consolidated Statement of Operations.Income. We have a liability of $7.412.2 million and $21.44.1 million related to the estimated future payment of interest and penalties at December 31, 20112014 and 20102013, respectively.

We file income tax returns in the U.S. federal jurisdiction, as well as various states and foreign jurisdictions. With few exceptions, weThe Internal Revenue Service (IRS) commenced an examination of our U.S. income tax returns for 2010 and 2011 in 2013. The Mexican tax authorities commenced a transfer pricing examination of our income tax return for 2008 in 2013 and continue with its transfer pricing examination of our 2007 income tax return. In 2014, the India Tax Authorities commenced a transfer pricing examination for the 2010/2011 tax year. We are no longer subject to U.S. federal, state and local, or non-U.S. income tax examinations by tax authorities for years before 2007. At this time, we are not aware of any examinations underway in any other foreign jurisdictions.

The 2004 through 2007 U.S. federal income tax return auditsexamination for the years 2008 and 2009 and the Mexico transfer pricing examination for the year 2006 were completed during 2010 and all related appeals were resolvedsettled in 2011. This settlement2013. These settlements resulted in a reduction of a portion of our liability for unrecognized income tax benefits of $28.7 millionand a cash payment of $4.1$4.7 million, which will be paid in 2012. The Internal Revenue Service (IRS) commenced an examination of our U.S. income tax returns for 2008 and 2009 in 2010. In 2011, we settled the outstanding items related to the 2006 audit with the Mexican tax authorities for $9.5 million. We are no longer subject to tax examinations by the Mexican tax authorities for tax years before 2006. At this time, we are also under audit in several other foreign jurisdictions.2013.

68

AMERICAN AXLE & MANUFACTURING HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)


Based on the status of the IRS audits and audits outside the U.S., and the protocol of finalizing audits by the relevant tax authorities, it is not possible to estimate the impact of changes, if any, to previously recorded uncertain tax positions. However, as of December 31, 2011, the IRS and other foreign tax authorities have proposed certain adjustments to our taxable income that would impact our liability for unrecognized tax benefits. Although it is not possible to predict the timing of the conclusion of all ongoing audits with certainty, we anticipate that the current U.S. IRS auditsaudit will be completed during 2012.2015. It is also possible that a reductionthe current 2007 and 2008 audits with the Mexican tax authorities will be completed before the end of 2016. Although it is difficult to estimate with certainty the amount of an audit settlement for the years currently under audit, we do not expect any settlements will be materially different from what we have recorded in the unrecognized tax benefits may occur; however, quantificationbenefits. We will continue to monitor the progress and conclusions of anall ongoing audits and will adjust our estimated range cannot be made at this time.liability as necessary.


65



AMERICAN AXLE & MANUFACTURING HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)


11.8.EARNINGS (LOSS) PER SHARE (EPS)

We present earnings per share (EPS) using the two-class method. This method allocates undistributed earnings between common shares and non-vested share based payment awards that entitle the holder to nonforfeitable dividend rights. Our participating securities include non-vested restricted stock units.

The following table sets forth the computation of our basic and diluted EPS:EPS available to shareholders of common stock (excluding participating securities):
 2011 2010 2009
 (in millions, except per share data)
Numerator     
Net income (loss) attributable to AAM$142.8
 $115.4
 $(253.1)
      
Denominators     
Basic shares outstanding -     
Weighted-average shares outstanding74.9
 71.5
 52.6
      
Effect of dilutive securities -     
Dilutive stock options0.1
 0.1
 
Dilutive warrants0.4
 2.9
 
      
Diluted shares outstanding -     
Adjusted weighted-average shares after assumed conversions75.4
 74.5
 52.6
      
Basic EPS$1.91
 $1.61
 $(4.81)
      
Diluted EPS$1.89
 $1.55
 $(4.81)

Basic and diluted loss per share are the same in 2009 because the effect of 0.7 million potentially dilutive warrants would have been antidilutive.
 2014 2013 2012
 (in millions, except per share data)
Numerator     
Net income attributable to AAM$143.0
 $94.5
 $367.7
Less: Net income attributable to participating securities(2.9) (1.9) (2.6)
Net income attributable to common shareholders - Basic$140.1
 $92.6
 $365.1
Undistributed earnings reallocated to common shareholders under two step dilutive method
 
 
Net income attributable to common shareholders - Dilutive$140.1
 $92.6
 $365.1
      
Denominators     
Basic common shares outstanding -     
Weighted-average shares outstanding77.3
 76.7
 75.3
Less: Participating securities(1.6) (1.5) (0.5)
Weighted-average common shares outstanding75.7
 75.2
 74.8
      
Effect of dilutive securities -     
Dilutive stock-based compensation0.2
 0.1
 0.1
      
Diluted shares outstanding -     
Adjusted weighted-average shares after assumed conversions75.9
 75.3
 74.9
      
Basic EPS$1.85
 $1.23
 $4.88
      
Diluted EPS$1.85
 $1.23
 $4.87

Certain exercisable stock options were excluded in the computations of diluted EPS because the exercise price of these options was greater than the average annual market prices of our stock. The number of stock options outstanding excluded from the calculation of diluted EPS was 4.00.5 million at year-end 20112014, 4.82.0 million at year-end 20102013 and 5.73.3 million at year-end 20092012. The ranges of exercise prices related to these stock options were $15.5619.54 - $26.65 at year-end 2014, $19.54 - $40.83 at year-end 20112013, and $10.0815.58 - $40.83 at year-end 2010 and $8.85 - $40.83 at year-end 20092012.

66

As part of the 2009 Settlement and Commercial Agreement, we issued to GM five year warrants, which entitled GM to purchase 4.1 million shares of AAM's common stock at an exercise price of $2.76 per share. In the first quarter of 2011, GM exercised these warrants. In accordance with the cashless exercise option available in the agreement, we issued 3.3 million net shares of common stock to GM.

69

AMERICAN AXLE & MANUFACTURING HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

12. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
9.COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

PURCHASE COMMITMENTS Obligated purchase commitments for capital expenditures and related project expenses were approximately $127.5109.8 million at December 31, 20112014 and $94.4161.4 million at December 31, 20102013.

LEGAL PROCEEDINGS We are involved in various legal proceedings incidental to our business. Although the outcome of these matters cannot be predicted with certainty, we do not believe that any of these matters, individually or in the aggregate, will have a material effect on our financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.

We are subject to various federal, state, local and foreign environmental and occupational safety and health laws, regulations and ordinances, including those regulating air emissions, water discharge, waste management and environmental cleanup. We will continue to closely monitor our environmental conditions to ensure that we are in compliance with all laws, regulations and ordinances. We have made, and will continue to make, capital and other expenditures to comply with environmental requirements, including recurring administrative costs. Such expenditures were not significant during 20112014, 20102013 and 20092012.
In 2012, the International UAW filed suit against AAM alleging that we violated certain provisions of the collective bargaining agreement covering represented hourly associates at the DMC and CKMF related to pension and postretirement benefits. In 2012, we recorded $28.7 million in cost of goods sold related to pension and postretirement benefits to be provided to certain eligible UAW associates as a result of our election to apply MAP-21 and the subsequent recertification of our U.S. hourly pension plan.  This suit was settled in 2012.

ENVIRONMENTAL OBLIGATIONS Due to the nature of our manufacturing operations, we have legal obligations to perform asset retirement activities pursuant to federal, state, and local requirements. The process of estimating environmental liabilities is complex. Significant uncertainty may exist related to the timing and method of the settlement of these obligations. Therefore, these liabilities are not reasonably estimable until a triggering event occurs that allows us to estimate a range and assess the probabilities of potential settlement dates and the potential methods of settlement. As a result of the plant idling and consolidations in 2009, 2010 and 2011, the methods and timing of certain environmental liabilities related to these facilities became reasonably estimable.  See Note 2 - Restructuring Actions for more detail on our environmental liabilities, included in asset retirement obligations.

In the future, we will update our estimated costs and potential settlement dates and methods and their associated probabilities based on available information. Any update may change our estimate and could result in a material adjustment to this liability.

67



AMERICAN AXLE & MANUFACTURING HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)


PRODUCT WARRANTIES We record a liability for estimated warranty obligations at the dates our products are sold. Our estimatedThese estimates are established using sales volumes and internal and external warranty obligationsdata where there is no payment history and historical information about the average cost of warranty claims for products sold are based on management estimates. For products and customers with actual warranty payment experience, we estimate warranty costs principally based on past claims history. For certain products and customers, actual warranty payment experience does not exist or is not mature. In these cases, weprior claims. We estimate our costs based on our analysis of the contractual arrangements with individualour customers, existing customer warranty programs, sales historyterms and internal and external warranty data. data, which includes a determination of our warranty claims and take actions to improve product quality and minimize warranty claims. We continuously evaluate these estimates and our customers' administration of their warranty programs. We closely monitor actual warranty claim data and adjust the liability, as necessary, on a quarterly basis.

We recorded $2.3 million and $9.9 million of expense in 2013 and 2012, respectively, related to a field action with our largest customer. In 2013, we made warranty payments of $12.3 million, of which $11.3 million related to this field action. During 2014 and 2013, we also made adjustments to our warranty accrual to reflect revised estimates regarding our projected future warranty obligations.

The following table provides a reconciliation of changes in the product warranty liability:
 December 31,
 2011 2010
 (in millions)
Beginning balance$2.3
 $2.1
Accruals12.0
 1.2
Settlements(0.7) (0.5)
Adjustments to prior period accruals(0.1) (0.4)
Foreign currency translation and other(0.1) (0.1)
Ending balance$13.4
 $2.3

As part of the 2009 Settlement and Commercial Agreement, we agreed to expanded warranty cost sharing with GM, which began on January 1, 2011.
 December 31,
 2014 2013
 (in millions)
Beginning balance$14.3
 $29.1
Accruals9.3
 12.8
Settlements(2.2) (12.3)
Adjustments to prior period accruals(8.7) (15.0)
Foreign currency translation(0.3) (0.3)
Ending balance$12.4
 $14.3


7068



AMERICAN AXLE & MANUFACTURING HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

13. SEGMENT AND GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION
10.RECLASSIFICATIONS OUT OF ACCUMULATED OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)

Reclassification adjustments and other activity impacting accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) (AOCI) during the year ended December 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013 are as follows (in millions):
 Defined Benefit Plans Foreign Currency Translation Adjustments Unrecognized Gain (Loss) on Derivatives Total
Balance at December 31, 2013$(197.9) $(18.6) $0.3
 $(216.2)
        
Other comprehensive loss before reclassifications(68.1)(a)(30.3) (6.8) (105.2)
        
Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) into net income25.4
(a)(b)(d)
 (0.9)(c)24.5
        
Net current period other comprehensive loss(42.7) (30.3) (7.7) (80.7)
        
Balance at December 31, 2014$(240.6) $(48.9) $(7.4) $(296.9)
        
        
 Defined Benefit Plans Foreign Currency Translation Adjustments Unrecognized Gain on Derivatives Total
Balance at December 31, 2012$(274.5) $7.6
 $2.3
 $(264.6)
        
Other comprehensive income (loss) before reclassifications67.7
(a)(26.2) 0.8
 42.3
        
Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) into net income8.9
(a)(b)
 (2.8)(c)6.1
        
Net current period other comprehensive income (loss)76.6
 (26.2) (2.0) 48.4
        
Balance at December 31, 2013$(197.9) $(18.6) $0.3
 $(216.2)
        
        
(a) These amounts are net of tax of $36.6 million and $(13.4) million for the other comprehensive loss before reclassifications and the amounts reclassified from AOCI, respectively, for the year ended December 31, 2014, and $(36.7) million and $(4.6) million, respectively, for the year ended December 31, 2013.
        
(b) The net amount reclassified from AOCI included $23.6 million in cost of goods sold (COGS) and $1.8 million in selling, general & administrative expenses (SG&A) for the year ended December 31, 2014 and $4.7 million in COGS and $4.2 million in SG&A for the year ended December 31, 2013.
        
(c) The amounts reclassified from AOCI are included in COGS.
        
(d) Includes a reclassification of $23.1 million, net of tax, in the fourth quarter of 2014, related to our terminated vested lump-sum pension payout in the U.S.


69



AMERICAN AXLE & MANUFACTURING HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)


11.SEGMENT AND GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION

We operate in one reportable segment: the manufacture, engineer, design and validation of driveline systems and related components and chassis modules for light trucks, SUVs, passenger cars, crossover vehicles and commercial vehicles. Financial information relating to our operations by geographic area is presented in the following table. Net sales are attributed to countries based upon location of customer. Long-lived assets exclude deferred income taxes.

December 31,December 31,
2011 2010 20092014 2013 2012
(in millions)(in millions)
Net sales          
United States$1,587.3
 $1,396.7
 $979.7
$2,073.6
 $1,682.0
 $1,576.6
Canada60.8
 50.1
 66.5
64.6
 74.4
 75.0
Mexico678.5
 638.0
 371.6
1,055.5
 865.6
 755.1
South America134.8
 99.5
 34.9
156.5
 201.1
 216.4
Other123.6
 98.7
 68.9
Asia238.6
 255.2
 214.5
Europe and other107.2
 129.0
 93.3
Total net sales$2,585.0
 $2,283.0
 $1,521.6
$3,696.0
 $3,207.3
 $2,930.9
          
Long-lived assets          
United States$845.7
 $816.2
 $818.0
$885.9
 $850.0
 $865.3
Mexico384.9
 381.8
 410.3
513.2
 469.3
 417.7
South America131.9
 124.4
 112.0
80.5
 100.2
 113.3
Other183.0
 151.6
 102.2
Asia177.3
 176.7
 159.0
Europe94.0
 93.2
 72.5
Total long-lived assets$1,545.5
 $1,474.0
 $1,442.5
$1,750.9
 $1,689.4
 $1,627.8


7170



AMERICAN AXLE & MANUFACTURING HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

14. UNAUDITED QUARTERLY FINANCIAL DATA
12.UNAUDITED QUARTERLY FINANCIAL DATA

Three Months Ended,Three Months Ended,
March 31 June 30 September 30 December 31March 31 June 30 September 30 December 31
(in millions, except per share data)(in millions, except per share data)
2011       
2014       
Net sales$645.6
 $686.2
 $647.6
 $605.6
$858.8
 $946.9
 $950.8
 $939.5
Gross profit115.4
 130.5
 103.5
 105.7
121.9
 149.0
 140.7
 111.2
Net income36.6
 47.9
 22.6
 30.0
33.6
 52.2
 44.0
 13.2
Net income attributable to AAM37.7
 49.2
 24.8
 31.1
33.6
 52.2
 44.0
 13.2
Basic EPS (1)
$0.51
 $0.65
 $0.33
 $0.41
$0.44
 $0.67
 $0.57
 $0.17
Diluted EPS (1)
$0.50
 $0.65
 $0.33
 $0.41
$0.44
 $0.67
 $0.57
 $0.17
              
2010       
2013       
Net sales$521.9
 $559.6
 $618.2
 $583.3
$755.6
 $799.6
 $820.8
 $831.3
Gross profit87.3
 98.9
 113.9
 101.6
104.3
 122.2
 125.3
 126.9
Net income16.2
 25.3
 38.7
 34.3
7.3
 25.8
 31.6
 29.8
Net income attributable to AAM16.3
 25.4
 38.8
 34.9
7.3
 25.8
 31.6
 29.8
Basic EPS (1)
$0.23
 $0.36
 $0.54
 $0.49
$0.10
 $0.34
 $0.41
 $0.39
Diluted EPS (1)
$0.22
 $0.34
 $0.52
 $0.47
$0.10
 $0.34
 $0.41
 $0.39
       

(1) Full year basic and diluted EPS will not necessarily agree to the sum of the four quarters because each quarter is a separate calculation.

(1)Full year basic and diluted EPS will not necessarily agree to the sum of the four quarters because each quarter is a separate calculation.
71



72

AMERICAN AXLE & MANUFACTURING HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

15.
13.SUPPLEMENTAL GUARANTOR CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Amounts have been revised for the effects of the error as discussed in Note 1 - Organization and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies.

Holdings has no significant assetassets other than its 100% ownership in AAM, Inc. and no direct subsidiaries other than AAM, Inc. Holdings fully and unconditionally guarantees the 7.875%The 7.75% Notes, 6.625% Notes, 6.25% Notes and 5.25% Notes, which are senior unsecured obligations of AAM, Inc. The 9.25% Notes are senior secured obligations of AAM Inc. and the 7.75%5.125% Notes are senior unsecured obligations of AAM Inc.; bothall of which are fully and unconditionally guaranteed by Holdings and substantially all domestic subsidiaries of AAM, Inc., which are 100% indirectly owned by Holdings.

These Condensed Consolidating Financial Statements are prepared under the equity method of accounting whereby the investments in subsidiaries are recorded at cost and adjusted for the parent's share of the subsidiaries' cumulative results of operations, capital contributions and distributions, and other equity changes.

Condensed Consolidating Statements of Operations          
Condensed Consolidating Statements of IncomeCondensed Consolidating Statements of Income          
                      
2011Holdings AAM Inc. Guarantor Subsidiaries Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries Elims Consolidated
2014Holdings AAM Inc. Guarantor Subsidiaries Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries Elims Consolidated
(in millions)(in millions)
Net sales                      
External$
 $777.7
 $195.3
 $1,612.0
 $
 $2,585.0
$
 $1,099.5
 $225.1
 $2,371.4
 $
 $3,696.0
Intercompany
 25.1
 189.8
 12.7
 (227.6) 

 13.1
 246.9
 21.6
 (281.6) 
Total net sales
 802.8
 385.1
 1,624.7
 (227.6) 2,585.0

 1,112.6
 472.0
 2,393.0
 (281.6) 3,696.0
Cost of goods sold
 727.0
 334.2
 1,296.3
 (227.6) 2,129.9

 1,112.4
 396.1
 1,946.3
 (281.6) 3,173.2
Gross profit
 75.8
 50.9
 328.4
 
 455.1

 0.2
 75.9
 446.7
 
 522.8
Selling, general and administrative expenses
 192.0
 
 39.7
 
 231.7

 194.0
 0.2
 61.0
 
 255.2
Operating income (loss)
 (116.2) 50.9
 288.7
 
 223.4

 (193.8) 75.7
 385.7
 
 267.6
Non-operating income (expense), net
 (91.8) 1.0
 5.5
 
 (85.3)
 (103.0) 9.0
 3.1
 
 (90.9)
Income (loss) before income taxes
 (208.0) 51.9
 294.2
 
 138.1

 (296.8) 84.7
 388.8
 
 176.7
Income tax expense (benefit)
 (5.2) 1.2
 5.0
 
 1.0

 (11.8) 0.9
 44.6
 
 33.7
Earnings (loss) from equity in subsidiaries142.8
 165.5
 (37.7) 
 (270.6) 
143.0
 204.0
 (23.3) 
 (323.7) 
Net income (loss) before royalties and dividends142.8
 (37.3) 13.0
 289.2
 (270.6) 137.1
143.0
 (81.0) 60.5
 344.2
 (323.7) 143.0
Royalties and dividends
 180.1
 
 (180.1) 
 

 224.0
 
 (224.0) 
 
Net income after royalties and dividends142.8
 142.8
 13.0
 109.1
 (270.6) 137.1
143.0
 143.0
 60.5
 120.2
 (323.7) 143.0
Net loss attributable to noncontrolling interests
 
 
 5.7
 
 5.7
Net income attributable to AAM$142.8
 $142.8
 $13.0
 $114.8
 $(270.6) $142.8
Other comprehensive loss, net of tax(80.7) (80.7) (23.5) (34.8) 139.0
 (80.7)
Comprehensive income$62.3
 $62.3
 $37.0
 $85.4
 $(184.7) $62.3


7372



AMERICAN AXLE & MANUFACTURING HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

                      
2010Holdings AAM Inc. Guarantor Subsidiaries Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries Elims Consolidated
2013Holdings AAM Inc. Guarantor Subsidiaries Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries Elims Consolidated
Net sales                      
External$
 $623.6
 $186.7
 $1,472.7
 $
 $2,283.0
$
 $773.6
 $226.0
 $2,207.7
 $
 $3,207.3
Intercompany
 26.0
 160.9
 14.8
 (201.7) 

 15.3
 226.1
 14.0
 (255.4) 
Total net sales
 649.6
 347.6
 1,487.5
 (201.7) 2,283.0

 788.9
 452.1
 2,221.7
 (255.4) 3,207.3
Cost of goods sold
 601.1
 323.9
 1,158.0
 (201.7) 1,881.3

 769.4
 389.0
 1,825.6
 (255.4) 2,728.6
Gross profit
 48.5
 23.7
 329.5
 
 401.7

 19.5
 63.1
 396.1
 
 478.7
Selling, general and administrative expenses
 177.8
 
 19.8
 
 197.6

 182.4
 0.1
 55.9
 
 238.4
Operating income (loss)
 (129.3) 23.7
 309.7
 
 204.1

 (162.9) 63.0
 340.2
 
 240.3
Non-operating income (expense), net
 (88.6) 0.3
 3.0
 
 (85.3)
 (155.1) 10.7
 (9.6) 
 (154.0)
Income (loss) before income taxes
 (217.9) 24.0
 312.7
 
 118.8

 (318.0) 73.7
 330.6
 
 86.3
Income tax expense
 1.5
 0.3
 2.5
 
 4.3
Income tax expense (benefit)
 (24.9) 0.9
 15.8
 
 (8.2)
Earnings (loss) from equity in subsidiaries115.4
 152.5
 (26.8) 
 (241.1) 
94.5
 167.0
 (21.7) 
 (239.8) 
Net income (loss) before royalties and dividends115.4
 (66.9) (3.1) 310.2
 (241.1) 114.5
94.5
 (126.1) 51.1
 314.8
 (239.8) 94.5
Royalties and dividends
 182.3
 
 (182.3) 
 

 220.6
 
 (220.6) 
 
Net income (loss) after royalties and dividends115.4
 115.4
 (3.1) 127.9
 (241.1) 114.5
Net loss attributable to noncontrolling interests
 
 
 0.9
 
 0.9
Net income (loss) attributable to AAM$115.4
 $115.4
 $(3.1) $128.8
 $(241.1) $115.4
Net income after royalties and dividends94.5
 94.5
 51.1
 94.2
 (239.8) 94.5
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax48.4
 48.4
 (7.2) (10.8) (30.4) 48.4
Comprehensive income$142.9
 $142.9
 $43.9
 $83.4
 $(270.2) $142.9
                      
2009Holdings AAM Inc. Guarantor Subsidiaries Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries Elims Consolidated
2012Holdings AAM Inc. Guarantor Subsidiaries Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries Elims Consolidated
Net sales                      
External$
 $514.5
 $142.3
 $864.8
 $
 $1,521.6
$
 $704.8
 $214.4
 $2,011.7
 $
 $2,930.9
Intercompany
 25.4
 92.9
 12.3
 (130.6) 

 18.6
 226.8
 25.2
 (270.6) 
Total net sales
 539.9
 235.2
 877.1
 (130.6) 1,521.6

 723.4
 441.2
 2,036.9
 (270.6) 2,930.9
Cost of goods sold
 656.7
 271.8
 754.8
 (130.6) 1,552.7

 709.8
 389.8
 1,702.2
 (270.6) 2,531.2
Gross profit (loss)
 (116.8) (36.6) 122.3
 
 (31.1)
Gross profit
 13.6
 51.4
 334.7
 
 399.7
Selling, general and administrative expenses
 163.0
 
 9.7
 
 172.7

 186.5
 
 56.8
 
 243.3
Operating income (loss)
 (279.8) (36.6) 112.6
 
 (203.8)
 (172.9) 51.4
 277.9
 
 156.4
Non-operating income (expense), net
 (95.5) 2.9
 (0.7) 
 (93.3)
 (135.2) (2.2) 12.5
 
 (124.9)
Income (loss) before income taxes
 (375.3) (33.7) 111.9
 
 (297.1)
 (308.1) 49.2
 290.4
 
 31.5
Income tax expense (benefit)
 (59.5) 0.2
 15.5
 
 (43.8)
 (343.9) (5.5) 14.2
 
 (335.2)
Earnings (loss) from equity in subsidiaries(253.1) 17.5
 (49.9) 
 285.5
 
367.7
 79.0
 (49.2) 
 (397.5) 
Net income (loss) before royalties and dividends(253.1) (298.3) (83.8) 96.4
 285.5
 (253.3)
Net income before royalties and dividends367.7
 114.8
 5.5
 276.2
 (397.5) 366.7
Royalties and dividends
 45.2
 
 (45.2) 
 

 252.9
 
 (252.9) 
 
Net income (loss) after royalties and dividends(253.1) (253.1) (83.8) 51.2
 285.5
 (253.3)
Net income after royalties and dividends367.7
 367.7
 5.5
 23.3
 (397.5) 366.7
Net loss attributable to noncontrolling interests
 
 
 0.2
 
 0.2

 
 
 1.0
 
 1.0
Net income (loss) attributable to AAM$(253.1) $(253.1) $(83.8) $51.4
 $285.5
 $(253.1)
Net income attributable to AAM$367.7
 $367.7
 $5.5
 $24.3
 $(397.5) $367.7
Other comprehensive loss, net of tax(60.5) (60.5) (10.1) (3.6) 74.2
 (60.5)
Foreign currency translation adjustments attributable to noncontrolling interests0.3
 0.3
 
 0.3
 (0.6) 0.3
Comprehensive income (loss) attributable to AAM$306.9
 $306.9
 $(4.6) $20.4
 $(322.7) $306.9










7473



AMERICAN AXLE & MANUFACTURING HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

Condensed Consolidating Balance Sheets           
2011Holdings AAM Inc. Guarantor Subsidiaries Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries Elims Consolidated
Assets(in millions)
Current assets           
    Cash and cash equivalents$
 $83.7
 $
 $85.5
 $
 $169.2
    Accounts receivable, net
 77.1
 23.3
 232.9
 
 333.3
    Inventories, net
 48.2
 35.3
 93.7
 
 177.2
    Other current assets
 26.5
 1.7
 55.2
 
 83.4
Total current assets
 235.5
 60.3
 467.3
 
 763.1
Property, plant and equipment, net
 260.4
 84.6
 626.2
 
 971.2
Goodwill
 
 147.8
 8.1
 
 155.9
Other assets and deferred charges
 327.2
 35.8
 75.5
 
 438.5
Investment in subsidiaries
 1,015.2
 26.6
 
 (1,041.8) 
Total assets$
 $1,838.3
 $355.1
 $1,177.1
 $(1,041.8) $2,328.7
Liabilities and stockholders' equity (deficit)           
Current liabilities           
    Accounts payable$
 $96.3
 $41.0
 199.8
 $
 $337.1
    Other current liabilities
 155.1
 3.0
 80.9
 
 239.0
Total current liabilities
 251.4
 44.0
 280.7
 
 576.1
Intercompany payable (receivable)320.7
 (368.6) 289.0
 (241.1) 
 
Long-term debt
 1,128.9
 5.9
 45.4
 
 1,180.2
Investment in subsidiaries obligation104.8
 
 
 
 (104.8) 
Other long-term liabilities
 931.4
 3.6
 57.0
 
 992.0
Total liabilities425.5
 1,943.1
 342.5
 142.0
 (104.8) 2,748.3
Total AAM Stockholders' equity (deficit)(425.5) (104.8) 12.6
 1,029.2
 (937.0) (425.5)
     Noncontrolling interests in subsidiaries
 
 
 5.9
 
 5.9
Total stockholders' equity (deficit)(425.5) (104.8) 12.6
 1,035.1
 (937.0) (419.6)
Total liabilities and stockholders' equity (deficit)$
 $1,838.3
 $355.1
 $1,177.1
 $(1,041.8) $2,328.7
            
2010Holdings AAM Inc. Guarantor Subsidiaries Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries Elims Consolidated
Assets           
Current assets           
    Cash and cash equivalents$
 $67.6
 $
 $177.0
 $
 $244.6
    Accounts receivable, net
 18.4
 24.5
 103.7
 
 146.6
    Inventories, net
 34.8
 27.0
 68.5
 
 130.3
    Other current assets
 35.6
 0.2
 44.8
 
 80.6
Total current assets
 156.4
 51.7
 394.0
 
 602.1
Property, plant and equipment, net
 259.6
 91.0
 585.7
 
 936.3
Goodwill
 
 147.8
 8.0
 
 155.8
Other assets and deferred charges
 329.8
 17.2
 73.5
 
 420.5
Investment in subsidiaries
 887.7
 41.0
 
 (928.7) 
Total assets$
 $1,633.5
 $348.7
 $1,061.2
 $(928.7) $2,114.7
Liabilities and stockholders' equity (deficit)           
Current liabilities           
    Accounts payable$
 $76.4
 $35.7
 $171.5
 $
 $283.6
    Other current liabilities
 209.9
 4.1
 71.5
 
 285.5
Total current liabilities
 286.3
 39.8
 243.0
 
 569.1
Intercompany payable (receivable)320.1
 (395.3) 272.5
 (197.3) 
 
Long-term debt0.4
 970.2
 6.1
 33.3
 
 1,010.0
Investment in subsidiaries obligation159.0
 
 
 
 (159.0) 
Other long-term liabilities
 931.3
 1.2
 71.2
 
 1,003.7
Total liabilities479.5
 1,792.5
 319.6
 150.2
 (159.0) 2,582.8
Total AAM Stockholders' equity (deficit)(479.5) (159.0) 29.1
 899.6
 (769.7) (479.5)
     Noncontrolling interests in subsidiaries
 
 
 11.4
 
 11.4
Total stockholders' equity (deficit)(479.5) (159.0) 29.1
 911.0
 (769.7) (468.1)
Total liabilities and stockholders' equity (deficit)$
 $1,633.5
 $348.7
 $1,061.2
 $(928.7) $2,114.7



Condensed Consolidating Balance Sheets           
2014Holdings AAM Inc. Guarantor Subsidiaries Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries Elims Consolidated
Assets(in millions)
Current assets           
    Cash and cash equivalents$
 $69.7
 $
 $179.5
 $
 $249.2
    Accounts receivable, net
 137.5
 23.9
 371.3
 
 532.7
    Intercompany receivables
 231.0
 174.1
 10.0
 (415.1) 
    Inventories, net
 64.9
 32.3
 151.6
 
 248.8
    Other current assets
 53.6
 2.6
 52.6
 
 108.8
Total current assets
 556.7
 232.9
 765.0
 (415.1) 1,139.5
Property, plant and equipment, net
 230.0
 87.9
 743.2
 
 1,061.1
Goodwill
 
 147.9
 7.1
 
 155.0
Intercompany notes and accounts receivable
 509.4
 219.1
 
 (728.5) 
Other assets and deferred charges
 736.6
 45.7
��121.3
 
 903.6
Investment in subsidiaries433.8
 1,134.6
 
 
 (1,568.4) 
Total assets$433.8
 $3,167.3
 $733.5
 $1,636.6
 $(2,712.0) $3,259.2
Liabilities and stockholders' equity           
Current liabilities           
    Current portion of long-term debt$
 $9.4
 $
 $3.6
 $
 $13.0
    Accounts payable
 127.3
 38.9
 278.1
 
 444.3
    Intercompany payables
 177.0
 105.3
 132.8
 (415.1) 
    Other current liabilities
 121.0
 4.4
 104.5
 
 229.9
Total current liabilities
 434.7
 148.6
 519.0
 (415.1) 687.2
Intercompany notes and accounts payable320.4
 6.9
 
 401.2
 (728.5) 
Long-term debt
 1,483.1
 4.9
 35.4
 
 1,523.4
Investment in subsidiaries obligation
 
 53.8
 
 (53.8) 
Other long-term liabilities
 808.8
 0.6
 125.8
 
 935.2
Total liabilities320.4
 2,733.5
 207.9
 1,081.4
 (1,197.4) 3,145.8
Total stockholders' equity113.4
 433.8
 525.6
 555.2
 (1,514.6) 113.4
Total liabilities and stockholders' equity$433.8
 $3,167.3
 $733.5
 $1,636.6
 $(2,712.0) $3,259.2
            
2013Holdings AAM Inc. Guarantor Subsidiaries Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries Elims Consolidated
Assets           
Current assets           
    Cash and cash equivalents$
 $36.9
 $
 $117.1
 $
 $154.0
    Accounts receivable, net
 102.7
 25.6
 330.2
 
 458.5
    Intercompany receivables
 180.5
 116.6
 9.2
 (306.3) 
    Inventories, net
 62.4
 34.2
 165.2
 
 261.8
    Other current assets
 43.8
 3.2
 75.0
 
 122.0
Total current assets
 426.3
 179.6
 696.7
 (306.3) 996.3
Property, plant and equipment, net
 239.8
 83.0
 735.7
 
 1,058.5
Goodwill
 
 147.8
 8.6
 
 156.4
Intercompany notes and accounts receivable
 327.0
 201.5
 
 (528.5) 
Other assets and deferred charges
 671.7
 44.8
 99.8
 
 816.3
Investment in subsidiaries363.7
 1,240.1
 
 
 (1,603.8) 
Total assets$363.7
 $2,904.9
 $656.7
 $1,540.8
 $(2,438.6) $3,027.5
Liabilities and stockholders' equity           
Current liabilities           
    Accounts payable$
 $106.2
 $44.5
 $286.7
 $
 $437.4
    Intercompany payables

 117.4
 98.6
 90.3
 (306.3) 
    Other current liabilities
 120.4
 4.1
 96.8
 
 221.3
Total current liabilities
 344.0
 147.2
 473.8
 (306.3) 658.7
Intercompany notes and accounts payable323.2
 3.7
 
 201.6
 (528.5) 
Long-term debt
 1,500.0
 5.3
 53.8
 
 1,559.1
Investment in subsidiaries obligation
 
 15.2
 
 (15.2) 
Other long-term liabilities
 693.5
 0.5
 75.2
 
 769.2
Total liabilities323.2
 2,541.2
 168.2
 804.4
 (850.0) 2,987.0
Total stockholders' equity40.5
 363.7
 488.5
 736.4
 (1,588.6) 40.5
Total liabilities and stockholders' equity$363.7
 $2,904.9
 $656.7
 $1,540.8
 $(2,438.6) $3,027.5


7574



AMERICAN AXLE & MANUFACTURING HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)




Condensed Consolidating Statements of Cash FlowsCondensed Consolidating Statements of Cash Flows          Condensed Consolidating Statements of Cash Flows          
                      
2011Holdings AAM Inc. Guarantor Subsidiaries Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries Elims Consolidated
2014Holdings AAM Inc. Guarantor Subsidiaries Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries Elims Consolidated
(in millions)(in millions)
Net cash provided by operating activities$
 $83.4
 $41.9
 $193.1
 $
 $318.4
Investing activities           
Purchases of property, plant and equipment
 (51.3) (18.6) (136.6) 
 (206.5)
Proceeds from sale of property, plant and equipment
 7.9
 0.4
 0.8
 
 9.1
Proceeds from government grants
 
 
 2.1
 
 2.1
Intercompany activity
 
 (23.3) 
 23.3
 
Proceeds from sale-leaseback of equipment
 
 
 
 
 
Net cash used in investing activities
 (43.4) (41.5) (133.7) 23.3
 (195.3)
Financing activities           
Net debt activity
 (7.8) (0.4) (13.8) 
 (22.0)
Debt issuance costs
 (0.3) 
 
 
 (0.3)
Employee stock option exercises
 1.2
 
 
 
 1.2
Purchase of treasury stock(0.3) 
 
 
 
 (0.3)
Intercompany activity0.3
 (0.3) 
 23.3
 (23.3) 
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities
 (7.2) (0.4) 9.5
 (23.3) (21.4)
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash
 
 
 (6.5) 
 (6.5)
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents
 32.8
 
 62.4
 
 95.2
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period
 36.9
 
 117.1
 
 154.0
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period$
 $69.7
 $
 $179.5
 $
 $249.2
           
2013Holdings AAM Inc. Guarantor Subsidiaries Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries Elims Consolidated
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities$
 $(119.3) $40.1
 $22.9
 $
 $(56.3)$
 $(35.9) $64.9
 $194.0
 $
 $223.0
Investing activities                      
Purchases of property, plant and equipment
 (43.9) (4.9) (114.3) 
 (163.1)
 (61.2) (12.5) (178.2) 
 (251.9)
Proceeds from sale of property, plant and equipment
 1.5
 
 7.4
 
 8.9

 5.1
 0.5
 3.5
 
 9.1
Purchase buyouts of leased equipment
 (13.4) 
 
 
 (13.4)
Acquisition, net
 
 (16.5) 
 
 (16.5)
Proceeds from sale-leaseback of equipment
 24.1
 
 
 
 24.1
Intercompany activity
 
 (52.6) 
 52.6
 
Net cash used in investing activities
 (55.8) (21.4) (106.9) 
 (184.1)
 (32.0) (64.6) (174.7) 52.6
 (218.7)
Financing activities                      
Net debt activity
 159.6
 (0.2) 14.2
 
 173.6

 110.1
 (0.3) (5.0) 
 104.8
Intercompany activity0.1
 37.9
 (18.5) (19.5) 
 
Debt issuance costs
 (10.9) 
 
 
 (10.9)
 (16.6) 
 (0.1) 
 (16.7)
Employee stock option exercises
 4.6
 
 
 
 4.6

 1.1
 
 
 
 1.1
Purchase of treasury stock(0.1) 
 
 
 
 (0.1)(0.4) 
 
 
 
 (0.4)
Intercompany activity0.4
 (0.4) 
 52.6
 (52.6) 
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities
 191.2
 (18.7) (5.3) 
 167.2

 94.2
 (0.3) 47.5
 (52.6) 88.8
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash
 
 
 (2.2) 
 (2.2)
 
 
 (1.5) 
 (1.5)
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
 16.1
 
 (91.5) 
 (75.4)
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents
 26.3
 
 65.3
 
 91.6
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period
 67.6
 
 177.0
 
 244.6

 10.6
 
 51.8
 
 62.4
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period$
 $83.7
 $
 $85.5
 $
 $169.2
$
 $36.9
 $
 $117.1
 $
 $154.0
           
2010Holdings AAM Inc. Guarantor Subsidiaries Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries Elims Consolidated
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities$
 $(5.9) $40.3
 $205.9
 $
 $240.3
Investing activities           
Purchases of property, plant and equipment
 (30.8) (6.2) (71.3) 
 (108.3)
Proceeds from sale of property, plant and equipment
 1.7
 
 3.2
 
 4.9
Redemption of short-term investments
 1.6
 
 4.8
 
 6.4
Purchase buyouts of leased equipment
 (7.8) 
 
 
 (7.8)
Acquisition, net
 
 
 (2.2) 
 (2.2)
Net cash used in investing activities
 (35.3) (6.2) (65.5) 
 (107.0)
Financing activities           
Net debt activity
 (59.2) (0.2) (2.5) 
 (61.9)
Intercompany activity1.3
 88.5
 (33.7) (56.1) 
 
Debt issuance costs
 (2.2) 
 
 
 (2.2)
Employee stock option exercises
 1.1
 
 
 
 1.1
Purchase of treasury stock(1.3) 
 
 
 
 (1.3)
Purchase of noncontrolling interest
 
 (2.1) 
 
 (2.1)
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities
 28.2
 (36.0) (58.6) 
 (66.4)
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash
 
 
 (0.4) 
 (0.4)
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
 (13.0) (1.9) 81.4
 
 66.5
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period
 80.6
 1.9
 95.6
 
 178.1
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period$
 $67.6
 $
 $177.0
 $
 $244.6


7675



AMERICAN AXLE & MANUFACTURING HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)






2009Holdings AAM Inc. Guarantor Subsidiaries Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries Elims Consolidated
2012Holdings AAM Inc. Guarantor Subsidiaries Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries Elims Consolidated
                      
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities$
 $(160.1) $15.6
 $160.4
 $
 $15.9
$
 $(274.3) $46.6
 $52.2
 $
 $(175.5)
Investing activities                      
Purchases of property, plant and equipment
 (55.3) (26.3) (56.1) 
 (137.7)
 (59.4) (9.0) (139.2) 
 (207.6)
Redemption of short-term investments
 7.9
 
 63.7
 
 71.6
Acquisition, net
 
 (10.2) 
 
 (10.2)
Proceeds from sale of property, plant and equipment
 1.4
 0.3
 
 
 1.7

 7.0
 
 3.1
 
 10.1
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities
 (46.0) (36.2) 7.6
 
 (74.6)
Proceeds from sale-leaseback of equipment
 12.1
 
 
 
 12.1
Intercompany activity
 

 (37.4) 

 37.4
 
Net cash used in investing activities
 (40.3) (46.4) (136.1) 37.4
 (185.4)
Financing activities                      
Net debt activity
 (65.4) (0.2) (9.5) 
 (75.1)
 257.9
 (0.2) 16.2
 
 273.9
Intercompany activity(139.1) 329.4
 22.7
 (213.0) 
 
Debt issuance costs
 (32.9) 
 
 
 (32.9)
 (10.6) 
 
 
 (10.6)
Proceeds from issuance of common stock109.7
 
 
 
 
 109.7
Proceeds from issuance of warrants to GM30.3
 
 
 
 
 30.3
Employee stock option exercises, including tax benefit
 1.0
 
 
 
 1.0

 0.1
 
 
 
 0.1
Purchase of treasury stock(0.9) 
 
 
 
 (0.9)(5.9) 
 
 
 
 (5.9)
Purchase of noncontrolling interest
 
 
 (4.0) 
 (4.0)
Intercompany activity5.9
 (5.9) 
 37.4
 (37.4) 
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities
 232.1
 22.5
 (222.5) 
 32.1

 241.5
 (0.2) 49.6
 (37.4) 253.5
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash
 
 
 5.9
 
 5.9

 
 
 0.6
 
 0.6
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
 26.0
 1.9
 (48.6) 
 (20.7)
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents
 (73.1) 
 (33.7) 
 (106.8)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period
 54.6
 
 144.2
 
 198.8

 83.7
 
 85.5
 
 169.2
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period$
 $80.6
 $1.9
 $95.6
 $
 $178.1
$
 $10.6
 $
 $51.8
 $
 $62.4


7776




REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM



To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of American Axle & Manufacturing Holdings, Inc.
Detroit, Michigan

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of American Axle & Manufacturing Holdings, Inc. and subsidiaries (the "Company") as of December 31, 20112014 and 20102013, and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders' deficit,income, comprehensive income, stockholders’ equity (deficit), and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2011.2014. Our audits also included the financial statement schedule listed in the Index at Item 15. We also have audited the Company's internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2011, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. The Company's management is responsible for theseThese financial statements and financial statement schedule for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting, and for its assessmentare the responsibility of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying Management's Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting.Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and financial statement schedule and an opinion on the Company's internal control over financial reporting based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatementmisstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, such consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of American Axle & Manufacturing Holdings, Inc. and subsidiaries at December 31, 2014 and 2013, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2014, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Also, in our opinion, such financial statement schedule, when considered in relation to the basic consolidated financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly, in all material respects, the information set forth therein.

We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the Company's internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2014, based on the criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission and our report dated February 23, 2015 expressed an adverse opinion on the Company's internal control over financial reporting.


/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP


Detroit, Michigan
February 23, 2015



77




REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM



To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of American Axle & Manufacturing Holdings, Inc.
Detroit, Michigan


We have audited American Axle and Manufacturing Holdings, Inc. and subsidiaries (the "Company's") internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2014, based on criteria established in Internal Control — Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. The Company's management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying Management Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company's internal control over financial reporting based on our audit.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audits of the financial statements included examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. Our audit of internal control over financial reporting included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audits also includedthat risk, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audits provideaudit provides a reasonable basis for our opinions.opinion.

A company's internal control over financial reporting is a process designed by, or under the supervision of, the company's principal executive and principal financial officers, or persons performing similar functions, and effected by the company's board of directors, management, and other personnel to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company's internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company's assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of the inherent limitations of internal control over financial reporting, including the possibility of collusion or improper management override of controls, material misstatements due to error or fraud may not be prevented or detected on a timely basis. Also, projections of any evaluation of the effectiveness of the internal control over financial reporting to future periods are subject to the risk that the controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

78


InA material weakness is a deficiency, or a combination of deficiencies, in internal control over financial reporting, such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of the company’s annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis. The following material weakness has been identified and included in management's assessment: management has identified a material weakness in the operating effectiveness of the Corporate Finance oversight of accounting for changes in certain accrued accounts payable balances at a single location. This material weakness was considered in determining the nature, timing, and extent of audit tests applied in our opinion,audit of the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects,and financial statement schedule as of and for the financial positionyear ended December 31, 2014 of the Company as of December 31, 2011 and 2010this report does not affect our report on such financial statements and the results of their operations and their cash flows for eachfinancial statement schedule.

78





In our opinion, because of the three years ineffect of the period ended December 31, 2011, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted inmaterial weakness identified above on the United Statesachievement of America. Also, in our opinion, such financial statement schedule, when considered in relation to the basic consolidated financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly, in all material respects,objectives of the information set forth therein. Also in our opinion,control criteria, the Company has not maintained in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2011,2014, based on the criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission.Commission.

We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedule as of and for the year ended December 31, 2014, of the Company and our report dated February 23, 2015 expressed an unqualified opinion on those financial statements and financial statement schedule.

/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP


Detroit, Michigan
February 8, 201223, 2015



79




Item 9.Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure

None

Item 9A.Controls and Procedures

Disclosure Controls and Procedures

Under the direction of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, we evaluated our disclosure controls and procedures and internal control over financial reporting. As discussed in our Form 10-Q/A for the interim period ended September 30, 2014 and as discussed below, we identified a material weakness in our internal control over financial reporting andwith respect to our accounting for changes in certain accrued accounts payable balances at a single location. As a result, we concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e)13a - 15(e) or 15d-15(e)15d - 15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”)) were not effective as of December 31, 2011.2014.

Management Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting

We are responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting. Our internal control system was designed to provide reasonable assurance to our management and Board of Directors regarding the preparation and fair presentation of our consolidated financial statements.

Our management assessed the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2011.2014. In making thethis assessment, we used the criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission.

A material weakness is a deficiency, or combination of deficiencies, in internal control over financial reporting, such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of the Company’s annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis.

As of December 31, 2014, a material weakness in the operating effectiveness of the Corporate Finance oversight of accounting for changes in certain accrued accounts payable balances at a single location existed.

Corporate Finance executives were not sufficiently involved in the review and analysis of the underlying support for changes in the accrued accounts payable balances at the location. As a result, Corporate Finance lacked sufficient information to properly assess the accounting for the correction of an overstatement of such accounts under generally accepted accounting principles. The effect of this material weakness in internal control was a misstatement of the condensed consolidated statements of income and comprehensive income for the third fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2014. This was corrected by restating the interim financial statements on Form 10-Q/A.

Based on our assessment, and the identification of this material weakness, management concluded that, as of December 31, 2011,2014, our internal control over financial reporting iswas not effective based on those criteria.the criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission.

The attestation report of our independent registered public accounting firm regarding internal control over financial reporting is included in Item 8 - “Financial”Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.”

Change in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

There has beenDuring the fourth fiscal quarter of 2014, and in connection with the preparation of our consolidated annual financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2014 which occurred in the first fiscal quarter of 2015, we have implemented new procedures, including enhanced documentation, analysis and review of changes in the accrued accounts payable balances. We have retrained Finance executives at the location where the overstatement of accrued accounts payable originated, as well as those working in Corporate Finance, as to the importance of appropriate communication and review of non-routine changes in accruals so that any such changes can be properly assessed under generally accepted accounting principles.


80




Except as described above, there were no changechanges in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the fourth fiscal quarter ended December 31, 20112014 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

As of February 23, 2015, management believes our remediation efforts have been effective with respect to our internal control over financial reporting and that the previous material weakness in our internal control over financial reporting has been remediated.

Item 9B.Other Information

None


8081




Part III


Item 10.Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance

The information required by Item 401(b), (d) (e) and (f) of Regulation S-K about our executive officers is furnished in Part I of this Form 10-K, Annual Report under the caption “Executive Officers of the Registrant.” All other information required by Item 10 is incorporated herein by reference from our Proxy Statement which we expect to file on or about March 16, 201219, 2015.

We have adopted a code of ethics that applies to our Chief Executive Officer, Chief Administrative Officer and Chief Financial Officer and the senior financial executives who report directly to our Chief Financial Officer. This code of ethics is available on our website at www.aam.com. We will post on our website any amendment to or waiver from the provisions of the code of ethics or our code of business conduct that applies to executive officers or directors of the Company.

Item 11.Executive Compensation

The information required by Item 11 is incorporated by reference from our Proxy Statement.

Item 12.Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters

The information required by Item 12 is incorporated by reference from our Proxy Statement.

Item 13.Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence

The information required by Item 13 under Items 404 and 407(a) of Regulation S-K is incorporated by reference from our Proxy Statement.

Item 14.Principal Accounting Fees and Services

The information required by Item 8(e) of Schedule 14A is incorporated by reference from our Proxy Statement.


8182




Part IV


Item 15. Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules

The following documents are filed as a part of this report:

1.All Financial Statements

Consolidated Statements of OperationsIncome
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income
Consolidated Balance Sheets
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
Consolidated Statements of Stockholders' DeficitEquity (Deficit)
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

2.Financial Statement Schedules

Schedule II - Valuation and Qualifying Accounts for the years ended December 31, 20112014, 20102013 and 20092012 is filed as part of this Form 10-K.

All other schedules have been omitted because they are not applicable or not required.

3.Exhibits

The following exhibits were previously filed unless otherwise indicated:

Number Description of Exhibit
   
3.01 Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation
  (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.01 filed with American Axle & Manufacturing Holdings, Inc. Registration Statement on Form S-1 (Registration No. 333-53491))
   
3.02 Amended and Restated Bylaws of American Axle & Manufacturing Inc.
   
4.01 
Specimen Certificate for shares of the Company's Common Stock

  (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.01 filed with American Axle & Manufacturing Holdings, Inc. Registration Statement on Form S-1 (Registration No. 333-53491))
   
4.02 
5.25% Senior Notes due 2014, Indenture, dated as of February 11, 2004, among AAM, Inc., as issuer, the Company, as guarantor, and BNY Midwest Trust Company, as trustee

(Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.02 filed with American Axle & Manufacturing Holdings, Inc. Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003)
4.03
7.875% Senior Notes due 2017, Indenture, dated as of February 27, 2007, between AAM, Inc., as issuer, the Company, as guarantor, and Bank of New York Trust Company, N.A., as trustee.

(Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.04 filed with American Axle & Manufacturing Holdings, Inc. Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007)
4.04
Indenture, dated as of December 18, 2009, among American Axle & Manufacturing, Inc., the Guarantors and U.S. Bank National Association, as trustee (including the form of the 9.25% Senior Secured Note due 2017).

(Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.01 of Current Report on Form 8-K dated December 21, 2009.)


82



Number
Description of Exhibit
4.05
Second Amended and Restated Rights Agreement, dated as of February 8, 2011, between American Axle & Manufacturing Holdings, Inc. and Computershare Trust Company, N.A., as Rights Agent.

(Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.01 of Current Report on Form 8-K dated February 8, 2011.)
4.06Form of Indenture, among American Axle & Manufacturing, Inc., American Axle & Manufacturing Holdings, Inc., as guarantor, certain subsidiary guarantors and U.S. Bank National Association, as trustee.trustee
  (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.3 of Registration Statement on Form S-3 dated July 12, 2011.)
   
4.074.03 Indenture, dated as of November 3, 2011, among American Axle & Manufacturing, Inc., the Guarantors and U.S. Bank National Association, as trustee.trustee
  (Incorporated by Reference to Exhibit 4.1 of Current Report on Form 8-K dated October 31, 2011.)
   
4.084.04 Form of 7.75% Senior NoteNotes due 2019.2019
  (Incorporated by Reference to Exhibit 4.2 of Current Report on Form 8-K dated October 31, 2011.)

83



AMERICAN AXLE & MANUFACTURING HOLDINGS, INC.

Number
Description of Exhibit
4.05Form of 6.625% Notes due 2022
(Incorporated by Reference to Exhibit 4.1 of Current Report on Form 8-K dated September 17, 2012.)
4.06Form of 6.25% Notes due 2021
(Incorporated by Reference to Exhibit 4.1 of Current Report on Form 8-K dated February 28, 2013.)
4.07Form of 5.125% Notes due 2019
(Incorporated by Reference to Exhibit 4.1 of Current Report on Form 8-K dated November 12, 2013.)
   
10.01 
Asset Purchase Agreement, dated February 18, 1994, between AAM, Inc. and GM, and all amendments thereto
 
  (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.01 filed with American Axle & Manufacturing Holdings, Inc. Registration Statement on Form S-1 (Registration No. 333-53491))
   
10.02
Employment Agreement, dated November 6, 1997, by and between the Company and Richard E. Dauch

(Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.11 filed with American Axle & Manufacturing Holdings, Inc. Registration Statement on Form S-1 (Registration No. 333-53491))
10.03
Disposition Agreement, dated as of December 10, 1998, between American Axle & Manufacturing of Michigan, Inc. and Richard E. Dauch

(Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.13(a) filed with American Axle & Manufacturing Holdings, Inc. Registration Statement on Form S-1 (Registration No. 333-53491))
‡10.04
Amendment dated December 20, 2000 to Employment Agreement dated as of November 6, 1997 by and between the Company and Richard E. Dauch

(Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.07 filed with American Axle & Manufacturing Holdings, Inc. Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2000)
‡10.05
Second Amendment, dated as of December 10, 2001, to the Employment Agreement, dated as of November 6, 1997, by and between the Company and Richard E. Dauch

(Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.49 filed with American Axle & Manufacturing Holdings, Inc. Form 10-K for the year ended December 30, 2001)
10.06 Lifetime Program Contract for GMT-900 Products, between GM and AAM, Inc.
  (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.51 filed with American Axle & Manufacturing Holdings, Inc. Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2003)

83


Number
Description of Exhibit
2003.)
   
++10.0710.03 Letter Agreement dated April 22, 2004 by and between DaimlerChrysler Corporation and AAM, Inc.
  (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.43 filed with American Axle & Manufacturing Holdings, Inc. Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2004)2004.)
   
10.0810.04 
Forms of Restricted Stock and Restricted Stock Unit Agreements under 1999 Stock Incentive Plan

  (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.45 filed with American Axle & Manufacturing Holdings, Inc. Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2004)
‡10.09
Form of 2002 Stock Option Agreement

(Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 of Current Report on Form 8-K dated October 26, 2005.2004.)
   
10.10
 Form of 2003 Stock Option Agreement

(Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 of Current Report on Form 8-K dated October 26, 2005.)
‡10.11
10.05
 
 Form of 2004 Stock Option Agreement

  (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 of Current Report on Form 8-K dated October 26, 2005.)
   
10.1210.06 
Form of 2005 Stock Option Agreement

  (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 of Current Report on Form 8-K dated October 26, 2005.)
   
10.1310.07 
 Form of Nonqualified Stock Option Agreement

  (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 of Current Report on Form 8-K dated October 26, 2005.)
   
10.14
Employment Agreement Extension between American Axle & Manufacturing Holdings, Inc. and Richard E. Dauch dated November 3, 2005

(Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.1 of Current Report on Form 8-K dated November 3, 2005.)
‡10.1510.08 
Restated 1999 American Axle & Manufacturing Holdings, Inc. Stock Incentive Compensation Plan

  (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.51 filed with American Axle & Manufacturing Holdings, Inc. Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005)
‡10.16
Amended and Restated American Axle & Manufacturing Holdings, Inc. Incentive Compensation Plan for Executive Officers    

(Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.1 of Current Report on Form 8-K dated February 1, 2007.)
‡10.17Employment Agreement Amendment between American Axle & Manufacturing Holdings, Inc. and Richard E. Dauch dated November 15, 2006
(Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.45 filed with American Axle & Manufacturing Holdings, Inc. Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006.2005.)

84






84AMERICAN AXLE & MANUFACTURING HOLDINGS, INC.


Number 
 
Description of Exhibit 
   
‡10.18Amended and Restated American Axle & Manufacturing, Inc. Supplemental Executive Retirement Program dated as December 22, 2006
(Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.46 filed with American Axle & Manufacturing Holdings, Inc. Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006.)
++10.1910.09 
Letter Agreement between General Motors Corporation and American Axle & Manufacturing, Inc. dated June 29, 2007

  (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.1 of Current Report on Form 8-K dated June 29, 2007)2007.)
   
10.20
Form of Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement for Non-Employee Directors of American Axle & Manufacturing Holdings, Inc.    

(Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of Current Report on Form 8-K dated February 1, 2008)
‡10.21
Amendment, dated January 31, 2008, to Employment Agreement, dated November 6, 1997, between American Axle & Manufacturing Holdings, Inc. and Richard E. Dauch.

(Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 of Current Report on Form 8-K dated February 1, 2008)
‡10.2210.10 Form of 2008 Stock Option Award Agreement for executive officers of American Axle & Manufacturing Holdings, Inc.
  (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.52 filed with American Axle & Manufacturing Holdings, Inc. Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007)2007.)
   
10.2310.11 
Agreement between General Motors Corporation and American Axle & Manufacturing, Inc. dated May 3, 2008, as amended May 16, 2008.
2008     
  (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of Current Report on Form 8-K dated May 23, 2008)2008.)
   
10.24Form of 2009 Deferred Compensation Unit Award Agreement
(Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.60 filed with American Axle & Manufacturing Holdings, Inc. Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008)
‡10.2510.12 Amended and Restated AAM 2009 Long-Term Incentive Plan
  (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.61 filed with American Axle & Manufacturing Holdings, Inc. Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2009)2009.)
   
++10.2610.13 
Settlement and Commercial Agreement, dated as of September 16, 2009, among General Motors Company, American Axle & Manufacturing Holdings, Inc. and American Axle & Manufacturing, Inc.

  (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.62 filed with American Axle & Manufacturing Holdings, Inc.of Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2009)2009.)
   
10.2710.14 
Second Lien Term Credit Agreement dated as of September 16, 2009, between American Axle & Manufacturing, Inc. and General Motors Company, as lender.  Second Lien Collateral Agreement dated as of September 16, 2009, among American Axle & Manufacturing Holdings, Inc., American Axle & Manufacturing, Inc., certain subsidiaries of American Axle & Manufacturing, Inc. identified therein and General Motors Company.

(Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.63 filed with American Axle & Manufacturing Holdings, Inc. Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2009)


85


Number
Description of Exhibit
10.28
Access and Security Agreement, dated as of September 16, 2009, between American Axle & Manufacturing, Inc. and General Motors Company.

(Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.1 filed with American Axle & Manufacturing Holdings, Inc. Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2009)
10.29
Amended and Restated Credit Agreement dated as of January 9, 2004, as amended and restated as of December 18, 2009, and as further amended and restated as of June 30, 2011, among American Axle & Manufacturing Holdings, Inc., American Axle & Manufacturing, Inc., JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. as Administrative Agent for the lenders party thereto, and J.P. Morgan Securities Inc. and Banc of America Securities LLC, as Joint Lead Arrangers and Joint Bookrunners.

(Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of Current Report on Form 8-K dated July 1, 2011)
10.30
First Lien Intercreditor Agreement dated as of December 18, 2009, among American Axle & Manufacturing Holdings, Inc., American Axle & Manufacturing, Inc., certain domestic subsidiaries of the Company, JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., U.S. Bank National Association and any additional authorized representative from time to time party hereto.

hereto
  (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.1 of Current Report on Form 8-K dated December 21, 2009.)
   
10.31‡10.15 Special Incentive Award Agreement dated March 15, 2010 between American Axle & Manufacturing Holdings, Inc. and David C. Dauch
(Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.47 of Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2010.)
‡10.16Special Incentive Award Agreement dated March 15, 2010 between American Axle & Manufacturing Holdings, Inc. and Michael K. Simonte
(Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.48 of Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2010.)
‡10.17American Axle & Manufacturing Holdings, Inc. 2012 Omnibus Incentive Plan
(Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of Current Report on Form 8-K dated May 1, 2012.)
‡10.18Form of Nonqualified Stock Option Award Agreement under the 2012 Omnibus Incentive Plan
(Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 of Current Report on Form 8-K dated May 1, 2012.)
‡10.19Form of Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement for Non-employee Directors under the 2012 Omnibus Incentive Plan
(Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 of Current Report on Form 8-K dated May 1, 2012.)

85



AMERICAN AXLE & MANUFACTURING HOLDINGS, INC.


Number
Description of Exhibit
‡10.20Form of Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement (Cliff Vesting) for Executive Officers under the 2012 Omnibus Incentive Plan
(Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 of Current Report on Form 8-K dated May 1, 2012.)
‡10.21Form of Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement (Installment Vesting) for Executive Officers under the 2012 Omnibus Incentive Plan
(Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 of Current Report on Form 8-K dated May 1, 2012.)
‡10.22Form of Performance Unit Award Agreement for Executive Officers under the 2012 Omnibus Incentive Plan
(Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.6 of Current Report on Form 8-K dated May 1, 2012.)
‡10.23American Axle & Manufacturing, Inc. Amended and Restated Supplemental Executive Retirement Program Document
(Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.37 of Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q dated July 27, 2012.)
10.24Amendment and Restatement Agreement dated as of September 13, 2013, among American Axle & Manufacturing Holdings, Inc., JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as Administrative Agent and as Collateral Agent, and each financial institution party thereto as a lender, including as Exhibit A thereto, the Amended and Restated Credit Agreement dated as of January 9, 2004 and amended and restated as of September 13, 2013 among American Axle & Manufacturing, Inc., American Axle & Manufacturing Holdings, Inc., the Lenders party thereto and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as Administrative Agent
(Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of Current Report on Form 8-K dated September 16, 2013.)
10.25Guarantee Agreement dated as of January 9, 2004, as amended and restated as of September 13, 2013, among American Axle & Manufacturing, Inc., American Axle & Manufacturing Holdings, Inc., certain subsidiaries of American Axle & Manufacturing, Inc. identified therein, and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. as Administrative Agent for the lenders referred to therein
(Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 of Current Report on Form 8-K dated September 16, 2013.)
10.26Collateral Agreement dated as of November 7, 2008, as amended and restated as of December 18, 2009, and as further amended on June 30, 2011,September 13, 2013, among American Axle & Manufacturing Holdings, Inc., American Axle & Manufacturing, Inc., certain subsidiaries of American Axle & Manufacturing, Inc. identified therein and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as Collateral Agent.

Agent
  (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.299.1 of Current Report on Form 8-K dated December 21, 2009.September 16, 2013.)
   
‡10.3210.27 
Amendment, dated as of December 22, 2009, to theAmended and Restated Employment Agreement dated as of November 6, 1997,September 27, 2013 by and between American Axle & Manufacturing Holdings, Inc.the Company and Richard E. Dauch.

David C. Dauch
  (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of Current Report on Form 8-K dated December 29, 2009.October 3, 2013.)
   
‡10.3310.28 
Special Incentive Award Agreement dated March 15, 2010 betweenAmended and Restated American Axle & Manufacturing, Holdings, Inc. and David C. Dauch.

Incentive Compensation Plan for Executive Officers effective as of January 1, 2013
  (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.47 filed with American Axle & Manufacturing Holdings, Inc.10.35 of Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2010.dated November 1, 2013.)
   
‡10.3410.29 
Special IncentiveForm of Performance Share Award Agreement dated March 15, 2010 between American Axle & Manufacturing Holdings, Inc. and Michael K. Simonte.

(Relative TSR) for Executive Officers under the 2012 Omnibus Incentive Plan
  (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.48 filed with American Axle & Manufacturing Holdings, Inc.10.35 of Annual Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2010.)
‡10.35
Special Incentive Award Agreement10-K dated March 15, 2010 between American Axle & Manufacturing Holdings, Inc. and John J. Bellanti.

(Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.49 filed with American Axle & Manufacturing Holdings, Inc. Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2010.)
10.36
Confidential Settlement Agreement and General Release dated July 2, 2010 between American Axle & Manufacturing, Inc. and Patrick S. Lancaster

(Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.51 filed with American Axle & Manufacturing Holdings, Inc. Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2010.February 07, 2014.)


86



AMERICAN AXLE & MANUFACTURING HOLDINGS, INC.

Number 
Description of Exhibit 
10.30Form of Performance Share Award Agreement (EBITDA) for Executive Officers under the 2012 Omnibus Incentive Plan
(Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.36 of Annual Report on Form 10-K dated February 07, 2014.)
10.31Form of Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement (Cliff Vesting) for Executive Officers under the 2012 Omnibus Incentive Plan
(Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.37 of Annual Report on Form 10-K dated February 07, 2014.)
10.32Form of Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement for Board of Directors under the 2012 Omnibus Incentive Plan
(Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q dated May 02, 2014.)
   
*12 Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges
   
*21 Subsidiaries of the Registrant
   
*23 Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
   
*31.1 Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act
   
*31.2 Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act
   
*32 Certifications of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
   
**101.INS XBRL Instance Document
   
**101.SCH XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document
   
**101.PRE XBRL Extension Presentation Linkbase Document
   
**101.LAB XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document
   
**101.CAL XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document
   
**101.DEF XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document
   
  (All other exhibits are not applicable.)


++    Confidential Treatment Request Granted by the SEC
Reflects Management or Compensatory Contract
*Filed herewith
**    Submitted electronically with this Report

87



AMERICAN AXLE & MANUFACTURING HOLDINGS, INC.

Schedule II - VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS

  Additions -      Additions -    
Balance at Charged to Deductions - BalanceBalance at Charged to Deductions - Balance
Beginning of Costs and See Notes At End ofBeginning of Costs and See Notes At End of
Period Expenses Below PeriodPeriod Expenses Below Period
(in millions)(in millions)
Year Ended December 31, 2009:       
Year Ended December 31, 2012:       
              
Allowance for doubtful accounts$3.3
 $8.2
 $3.2
 
(1) 
 $8.3
$5.5
 $2.0
 $1.0
 
(1) 
 $6.5
              
Allowance for deferred taxes581.8
 268.3
 290.4
 
(3) 
 559.7
426.9
 80.9
 341.7
 
(3) 
 166.1
              
Inventory valuation allowance28.3
 17.3
 11.9
 
(2) 
 33.7
26.7
 7.9
 13.6
 
(2) 
 21.0
              
Year Ended December 31, 2010:       
Year Ended December 31, 2013:       
              
Allowance for doubtful accounts8.3
 3.1
 5.2
 
(1) 
 6.2
6.5
 2.3
 3.9
 
(1) 
 4.9
              
Allowance for deferred taxes559.7
 50.9
 49.7
 
(4) 
 560.9
166.1
 14.0
 16.4
 163.7
              
Inventory valuation allowance33.7
 7.7
 13.7
 
(2) 
 27.7
21.0
 19.4
 13.1
 
(2) 
 27.3
              
Year Ended December 31, 2011:       
Year Ended December 31, 2014:       
              
Allowance for doubtful accounts6.2
 3.3
 4.0
 
(1) 
 5.5
4.9
 1.3
 1.6
 
(1) 
 4.6
              
Allowance for deferred taxes560.9
 14.6
 148.6
 
(5) 
 426.9
163.7
 13.8
 20.6
 
(4) 
 156.9
              
Inventory valuation allowance27.7
 6.3
 7.3
 
(2) 
 26.7
27.3
 10.6
 10.0
 
(2) 
 27.9
       


(1)Uncollectible accounts charged off net of recoveries.

(2)Primarily relates to inventory adjustments for physical quantity discrepancies and write-offs of excess and obsolete inventories.

(3)Primarily relates to special legislation that was passed in 2009 that allowed us to extend the carryback periodreversal of the valuation allowance against our 2008 net operating loss and the decrease in the netU.S. federal deferred tax assets due to a deferred tax liability that was recorded in 2009 for the estimated tax impact of undistributed earnings of certain foreign subsidiaries.assets.

(4)Primarily relates to the utilizationreversal of some of the 2009 NOL carryover anda valuation allowance against an adjustment of the deferred tax liability for the U.S. tax impact of undistributed earnings of certain foreign subsidiaries.

(5)
Primarily relates to the utilization of some of the 2009 NOL carryover, an adjustment of the deferred tax liability for the U.S. tax impact of undistributed earnings of certain foreign subsidiaries and the settlement of the U.S. audit appeals for the 2004 to 2007 tax years.
expiring net operating loss in China.


88





Signatures

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.


AMERICAN AXLE & MANUFACTURING HOLDINGS, INC.
(Registrant)
 
/s/ Michael K. Simonte
Michael K. Simonte
Executive Vice President &
Chief Financial Officer
(Chief Accounting Officer)

Date: February 8, 201223, 2015
    

89






Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities on the dates indicated.
Signature Title Date
     
/s/ Richard E.David C. Dauch Co-Founder, Chairman of the Board, President & February 8, 201223, 2015
 Richard E.David C. Dauch Chief Executive Officer  
     
/s/ Michael K. Simonte Executive Vice President & February 8, 201223, 2015
 Michael K. Simonte Chief Financial Officer  
     
/s/ Salvatore J. Bonanno Sr.DirectorFebruary 8, 2012
 Salvatore J. Bonanno Sr.
/s/ Elizabeth A. Chappell Director February 8, 201223, 2015
 Elizabeth A. Chappell
/s/ David C. DauchDirectorFebruary 8, 2012
 David C. Dauch    
     
/s/ Forest J. Farmer Director February 8, 201223, 2015
 Forest J. Farmer    
     
/s/ Steven B. Hantler Director February 8, 201223, 2015
Steven B. Hantler    
     
/s/ Richard C. Lappin Director February 8, 201223, 2015
 Richard C. Lappin    
     
/s/ James A. McCaslin Director February 8, 201223, 2015
James A. McCaslin    
     
/s/ William P. Miller II Director February 8, 201223, 2015
 William P. Miller II    
     
/s/ John F. Smith Director February 8, 201223, 2015
John F. Smith    
     
/s/ Larry K. SwitzerSamuel Valenti III Director February 8, 201223, 2015
 Larry K. SwitzerSamuel Valenti III    
     
/s/ Thomas K. Walker Director February 8, 201223, 2015
Thomas K. Walker    
/s/ Dr. Henry T. YangDirectorFebruary 8, 2012
 Dr. Henry T. Yang

90