UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K

(Mark One)

[X]

 ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the fiscal year endedSeptember 30, 20142017

[   ]

 TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from ________________ to ______________________________ to________________

Commission file number:000-51652001-37606

ANAVEX LIFE SCIENCES CORP.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Nevada98-0608404
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
  
51 W 52ndStreet, 7thFloor, New York, NY USA10019
(Address of principal executive offices)(Zip Code)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code1-844-689-3939

Securities registered under Section 12(b) of the Act:

NoneCommon Stock, $0.001 par valueN/ANASDAQ Stock Market LLC
Title of each className of each exchange on which registered

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:

Common Stock, $0.001 par value

(Title of class)

Indicate by checkmark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.
Yes [   ]      No [X]

Indicate by checkmark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Act.
Yes [   ]      No [X]

Indicate by checkmark whether the registrant has (1) filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes [X]      No [   ]


Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).
Yes [X]      No [   ]

Indicate by checkmark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (§ 229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. [   ]

Indicate by checkmark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Indicate by checkmark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.
Yes ☐ No ☒
Indicate by checkmark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Act.
Yes ☐ No ☒
Indicate by checkmark whether the registrant has (1) filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes ☒  No ☐
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).
Yes ☒  No ☐
Indicate by checkmark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (§ 229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.
Indicate by checkmark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filer [   ] Accelerated filer                 [   ]

Smaller reporting company ☐ 

Non-accelerated filer   [   ](Do not check if a smaller reporting company)Smaller reporting

Emerging growth company [X]

Accelerated filer

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act).
Yes ☐ No ☒

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act).
Yes [   ]      No [X]

State the aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common equity held by non-affiliates computed by reference to the price at which the common equity was last sold, or the average bid and asked price of such common equity, as of the last business day of the registrant’s most recently completed second fiscal quarter: $14,865,420$163,478,217 based on a price of $0.45$4.90 per share, being the closing price of the registrant’s common stock on March 31, 2014.2016.

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the registrant’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date 54,684,90544,220,833 issued and outstanding as of December 15, 2014.8, 2017.

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

None.

ii


TABLE OF CONTENTS

PART I1
ITEM 1. BUSINESS1
Item 1.ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORSBusiness.19
Item 1A.ITEM 1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTSRisk Factors.717
Item 1B.ITEM 2. PROPERTIESUnresolved Staff Comments.1817
Item 2.ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGSProperties.1817
Item 3.ITEM 4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURESLegal Proceedings.1817
Item 4.PART IIMine safety disclosures.1817
ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES17
PART IIITEM 6 SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA1920
ITEM 7 MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATION20
Item 5.ITEM 7A QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISKMarket for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities1926
Item 6.ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATASelected Financial Data2126
Item 7.ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL MATTERSManagement's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations2127
Item 7A.ITEM 9A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURESQuantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk.2827
Item 8.ITEM 9B OTHER INFORMATIONFinancial Statements and Supplementary Data.2827
Item 9.PART IIIChanges In and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure.2927
Item 9AITEM 10 DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCEControls and Procedures2927
Item 9BITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATIONOther Information3130
ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS35
PART IIIITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE3237
ITEM 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES38
Item 10.PART IVDirectors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance.3239
Item 11.ITEM 15. EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULESExecutive Compensation.35
Item 12.Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters.38
Item 13.Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence39
Item 14.Principal Accountant Fees and Services40
PART IV41
Item 15.Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules41
Signatures

iii


ii

Forward Looking Statements.

This Annual Report on Form 10-K includes forward-looking statements. All statements other than statements of historical facts contained in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, including statements regarding our anticipated future clinical and regulatory milestone events, future financial position, business strategy and plans and objectives of management for future operations, are forward-looking statements. The words “believe,” “may,” “estimate,” ���continue,“continue,” “anticipate,” “intend,” “expect”“expect,” “should,” “forecast,” “could,” “suggest,” “plan,” and similar expressions, as they relate to us, are intended to identify forward-looking statements. Such forward-looking statements include, without limitation, statements regarding the anticipated start dates, durations and completion dates of our ongoing and future clinical studies, statements regarding the anticipated designs of our future clinical studies, statements regarding our anticipated future regulatory submissions and statements regarding our anticipated future cash position. regarding: 

our ability to generate any revenue or to continue as a going concern;

our ability to successfully conduct clinical and preclinical trials for our product candidates;

our ability to raise additional capital on favorable terms;

our ability to execute our development plan on time and on budget;

our products ability to demonstrate efficacy or an acceptable safety profile;

our ability to obtain the support of qualified scientific collaborators;

our ability, whether alone or with commercial partners, to successfully commercialize any of our product candidates that may be approved for sale;

our ability to identify and obtain additional product candidates;

intellectual property rights and protections;

competition;

the anticipated start dates, durations and completion dates of our ongoing and future clinical studies;

the anticipated designs of our future clinical studies;

our anticipated future regulatory submissions and our ability to receive regulatory approvals to develop and market our product candidates; and

our anticipated future cash position.

We have based these forward-looking statements largely on our current expectations and projections about future events, including the responses we expect from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, or FDA, and other regulatory authorities and financial trends that we believe may affect our financial condition, results of operations, business strategy, preclinical and clinical trials and financial needs. These forward-looking statements are subject to a number of risks, uncertainties and assumptions including without limitation the risks described in “Risk Factors” in Part I, Item 1A of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. These risks are not exhaustive. Other sections of this Annual Report on Form 10-K include additional factors which could adversely impact our business and financial performance. Moreover, we operate in a very competitive and rapidly changing environment. New risk factors emerge from time to time and it is not possible for our management to predict all risk factors, nor can we assess the impact of all factors on our business or the extent to which any factor, or combination of factors, may cause actual results to differ materially from those contained in any forward-looking statements. You should not rely upon forward-looking statements as predictions of future events. We cannot assure you that the events and circumstances reflected in the forward-looking statements will be achieved or occur and actual results could differ materially from those projected in the forward-looking statements. Except as required by applicable laws including the securities laws of the United States, and Canada, we assume no obligation to update or supplement forward-looking statements.

As used in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, the terms “we,” “us,” “our,” and “Anavex” mean Anavex Life Sciences Corp., unless the context clearly requires otherwise.

iv


iii

PART I

ITEM 1. BUSINESS

We are

Anavex Life Sciences Corp. is a clinical stage biopharmaceutical company engaged in the development of differentiated therapeutics for the treatment of neurodegenerative and neurodevelopmental diseases including drug candidates to treat Alzheimer’s disease, other central nervous system (CNS)(“CNS”) diseases, pain and various types of cancer. Our lead compoundscompound, ANAVEX®2-73, and ANAVEX PLUS, a combination of ANAVEX 2-73 with donepezil (Aricept), areis being developed to treat Alzheimer’s disease, Parkinson’s disease and potentially other central nervous system (CNS) diseases.diseases, including rare diseases, such as Rett syndrome, a severe neurological disorder caused by mutations in the X-linked gene MECP2 (methyl-CpG-binding protein 2).

In December 2014November 2016, a Phase 2a clinical trial, consisting of PART A and PART B, which lasted a total of 57 weeks, was initiatedcompleted for ANAVEX®2-73 which is being evaluated for the treatment ofin mild-to-moderate Alzheimer’s disease. Thepatients. This open-label randomized trial ismet both primary and secondary endpoints, and was designed to assess the safety and exploratory efficacy of ANAVEX®2-73 alone as well as in combination with donepezil (ANAVEX PLUS) in patients with mild to moderate Alzheimer’s disease.32 patients. ANAVEX®2-73 targets sigma-1 and muscarinic receptors, which have been shown in preclinical studies to reduce stress levels in the brain believed to restore cellular homeostasis and to reverse the pathological hallmarks observed in Alzheimer’s disease. In October 2017, we presented pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacodynamic (PD) data from its positive Phase 2a study, which established a concentration-effect relationship between ANAVEX®2-73 showed no serious adverse eventsand study measurements. These measures obtained from all patients who participated in the entire 57 weeks include exploratory cognitive and functional scores as well as biomarker signals of brain activity. Additionally, ANAVEX®2-73 activity appears to be enhanced by its active metabolite (ANAVEX19-144), which also targets the sigma-1 receptor and has a previously performedhalf-life approximately twice as long as the parent molecule.

In March 2016, we received approval from the Ethics Committee in Australia to extend the Phase 1 study. 2a clinical trial, which had been requested by patients and their caregivers. The trial extension allows participants who completed the 52-week PART B of the study to roll-over into a new trial and continue taking ANAVEX®2-73 for an additional 104 weeks, providing an opportunity to gather extended safety data. The trial is independent of our planned larger Phase 2/3 double-blind, placebo-controlled study of ANAVEX®2-73 in Alzheimer’s disease.

In pre-clinical studies,February 2016, we presented positive preclinical data for ANAVEX®2-73 in Rett syndrome, a rare neurodevelopmental disease. The study was funded by the International Rett Syndrome Foundation (the “Rettsyndrome.org foundation”). In January 2017, we were awarded a financial grant from the Rettsyndrome.org foundation of a minimum of $0.6 million towards covering the costs of a planned U.S. multicenter Phase 2 clinical trial of ANAVEX®2-73 for the treatment of Rett syndrome. The Phase 2 trial is scheduled to begin following the FDA’s approval of the Company’s investigational new drug (IND) application and will be a randomized, double blind, placebo-controlled study of ANAVEX®2-73 in patients with Rett syndrome lasting up to 12 weeks. Primary and secondary endpoints include safety as well as Rett syndrome conditions such as cognitive impairment, motor impairment, behavioral symptoms and seizure activity.

In September 2016, we presented positive preclinical data for ANAVEX®2-73 in Parkinson’s disease, which demonstrated anti-amnesicsignificant improvements on all measures: behavioral, histopathological, and neuroprotective propertiesneuroinflammatory endpoints. The study was funded by the Michael J Fox Foundation. Additional data was announced in various animal models includingOctober 2017 from the transgenic mouse model Tg2576.for experimental parkinsonism. The data presented indicates that ANAVEX®2-73 induces robust neurorestoration in experimental parkinsonism. The encouraging results we have gathered in this model, coupled with the favorable profile of this compound in the Alzheimer’s disease trial, support the notion that ANAVEX®2-73 is a promising clinical candidate drug for Parkinson’s disease.

We intend to identify and initiate discussions with potential commercial partners inwithin the next 12 months. Further, we may acquire or develop new intellectual property and assign, license, or otherwise transfer our intellectual property to further our goals.

Our Pipeline

Our research and development pipeline includes one clinical drug candidate and several compounds in different stages of pre-clinical study.


Our proprietary SIGMACEPTOR™ Discovery Platform produced small molecule drug candidates with unique modes of action, based on our understanding of sigma receptors. Sigma receptors may be targets for therapeutics to combat many human diseases, both of neurodegenerative nature, including Alzheimer’s disease, as well as of neurodevelopmental nature, like Rett syndrome, a rare disease. When bound by the appropriate ligands, sigma receptors influence the functioning of multiple biochemical signals that are involved in the pathogenesis (origin or development) of disease.

Compounds that have been subjects of our research include the following:

ANAVEX 2-73

ANAVEX®2-73

ANAVEX®2-73 may offer a disease-modifying approach in Alzheimer’s disease (AD) by using ligands that activate sigma-1 receptors.

In AD animal models, ANAVEX®2-73 has shown pharmacological, histological and behavioral evidence as a potential neuroprotective, anti-amnesic, anti-convulsive and anti-depressive therapeutic agent, due to its potent affinity to sigma-1 receptors and moderate affinities to M1-4 type muscarinic receptors. In addition, ANAVEX®2-73 has shown a potential dual mechanism which may impact both amyloid and tau pathology. In a transgenic AD animal model Tg2576 ANAVEX®2-73 induced a statistically significant neuroprotective effect against the development of oxidative stress in the mouse brain, as well as significantly increased the expression of functional and synaptic plasticity markers that is apparently amyloid-beta independent. It also statistically alleviated the learning and memory deficits developed over time in the animals, regardless of sex, both in terms of spatial working memory and long-term spatial reference memory.

1


Based on the results of pre-clinical testing, we initiated and completed a Phase 1 single ascending dose (SAD) clinical trial of ANAVEX®2-73 in 2011. In this Phase 1 SAD trial, the maximum tolerated single dose was defined per protocol as 55-60 mg. This dose is above the equivalent dose shown to have positive effects in mouse models of AD. There were no significant changes in laboratory or electrocardiogram (ECG) parameters. ANAVEX®2-73 was well tolerated below the 55-60 mg dose with only mild adverse events in some subjects. Observed adverse events at doses above the maximum tolerated single dose included headache and dizziness, which were moderate in severity and reversible. These side effects are often seen with drugs that target central nervous system (CNS)CNS conditions, including AD.

The ANAVEX®2-73 Phase 1 SAD trial was conducted as a randomized, placebo-controlled study. Healthy male volunteers between the ages of 18 and 55 received single, ascending oral doses over the course of the trial. Study endpoints included safety and tolerability together with pharmacokinetic parameters. Pharmacokinetics includes the absorption and distribution of a drug, the rate at which a drug enters the blood and the duration of its effect, as well as chemical changes of the substance in the body. This study was conducted in Germany in collaboration with ABX-CRO, a clinical research organization that has conducted several Alzheimer’s disease studies, and the Technical University of Dresden.

ANAVEX PLUS

ANAVEX PLUS,In December 2014, a combinationPhase 2a clinical trial was initiated for ANAVEX®2-73, which is being evaluated for the treatment of Alzheimer’s disease. The open-label randomized trial was designed to assess the safety and exploratory efficacy of ANAVEX®2-73 in 32 patients with mild-to-moderate Alzheimer’s disease. ANAVEX® 2-73 targets sigma-1 and muscarinic receptors, which have been shown in preclinical studies to reduce stress levels in the brain believed to restore cellular homeostasis and to reverse the pathological hallmarks observed in Alzheimer’s disease.

The Phase 2a study met both primary and secondary objectives of the study. The 31-week preliminary exploratory safety and efficacy data from the Phase 2a study of ANAVEX®2-73 in Alzheimer’s patients, with most receiving also donepezil, (Aricept®)the current standard of care, demonstrated favorable safety, maximum tolerated dose, positive dose response, sustained efficacy response through 31 weeks for both cognitive and functional measures, as well as positive unexpected therapeutic response events. ANAVEX®2-73 continued to demonstrate a favorable adverse event (AE) profile through 31 weeks in a patient population of elderly Alzheimer’s patients with varying degrees of physical fragility. The most common side effects across all AE categories tended to be of mild severity grade 1, and were resolved with dose reductions that were anticipated within the adaptive design of the study protocol.


Through 57 weeks, Alzheimer’s patients taking a daily oral dose between 10mg and 50mg of ANAVEX®2-73 was well tolerated. There were no clinically significant treatment-related adverse events and no serious adverse events. Despite non-optimized dosing of ANAVEX®2-73 throughout the 57-week study, continued significant improvements from baseline of cognitive, functional and behavioral scores in a group of patients were observed, respectively. This data was analyzed using refined mathematical modeling methods in conjunction with the detailed pharmacokinetic (PK) information.

Pre-specified exploratory analyses included the cognitive (MMSE) and the functional (ADCS-ADL) changes from baseline. A continued stabilization of both cognitive (MMSE) and functional (ADCS-ADL) measures in patients treated with ANAVEX®2-73 was observed. This correlation was positive with all measured scores (MMSE, ADCS-ADL, Cogstate, HAM-D and EEG/ERP).

ANAVEX®2-73 data presented meets prerequisite information in order to progress into a Phase 2/3 placebo controlled study, which is currently in the preparation phase.

Preclinical data also validates ANAVEX®2-73 as a potential novel combinationprospective platform drug for other neurodegenerative diseases beyond Alzheimer’s disease. Aricept® (donepezil) is now generic.as well as neurodevelopmental diseases, more specifically, Parkinson’s disease, epilepsy, Rett syndrome, Angelman syndrome and Fragile X syndrome. ANAVEX®2-73 showeddemonstrated significant improvements in combination with donepezil an unexpected and clear synergic effectall of memory improvement by up to 80%these indications in the respective preclinical animal models. A patent application was filed

For Parkinson’s disease, data demonstrates significant improvements and restoration of function in a classic animal model of Parkinson’s disease. Significant improvements were seen on all measures tested: behavioral, histopathological, and neuroinflammatory endpoints. We are currently in preparation for a Phase 2 clinical trial for the treatment of Parkinson’s disease.

For epilepsy, data demonstrates both significant and dose related improvement in the USreduction of seizures, as well as significant synergy with each of three generations of epilepsy drugs currently on the market.

In Rett syndrome, administration of ANAVEX®2-73 resulted in both significant and dose related improvements in an array of behavioral paradigms in the MECP2 HET Rett syndrome disease model. In addition, in a further experiment sponsored by the Rettsyndrome.org foundation, ANAVEX®2-73 was evaluated in automatic visual response and respiration tests in 7-month old mice, an age at which advanced pathology is evident. Vehicle-treated MECP2 mice demonstrated fewer automatic visual responses than wild-type mice. Treatment with ANAVEX®2-73 for four weeks significantly increased the automatic visual response in the MECP2 Rett syndrome disease mouse.

We have filed an investigational new drug application, or IND, for ANAVEX®2-73 for the combinationtreatment of donepezilRett syndrome and are currently in preparation for a Phase 2 clinical trial. The IND might not be approved by the FDA, or it may be delayed or put on clinical hold or partial hold, or additional preclinical studies may be required.

In May 2017, we announced new preclinical data for ANAVEX®2-73 in the neurodevelopmental disorders Angelman syndrome and if granted would give patent protection at least until 2033.

Fragile X syndrome. In a humanized calibrated cortical network computerstudy sponsored by the Foundation for Angelman Syndrome, ANAVEX®2-73 was assessed in a mouse model for the unexpected pre-clinical synergy betweendevelopment of audiogenic seizures. The results indicated that ANAVEX®2-73 administration significantly reduced audiogenic-induced seizures. In a recent study sponsored by FRAXA Research Foundation regarding Fragile X syndrome, data demonstrated that ANAVEX®2-73 restored hippocampal brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) expression to normal levels. BDNF under-expression has been observed in many neurodevelopmental and donepezil was confirmedneurodegenerative pathologies. BDNF signaling promotes maturation of both excitatory and inhibitory synapses. ANAVEX®2-73 normalization of BDNF expression could be a contributing factor for the positive data observed in both neurodevelopmental and neurodegenerative disorders like Angelman and Fragile X syndromes.

Preclinical data presented also indicates that ANAVEX®2-73 demonstrates protective effects of mitochondrial enzyme complexes during pathological conditions, which, if impaired, are believed to play a role in the pathogenesis of neurodegenerative and neurodevelopmental diseases. In May 2016 and June 2016, the FDA granted Orphan Drug Designation to ANAVEX®2-73 for the treatment of Rett syndrome and infantile spasms, respectively. 


Additionally, in October 2017 we presented additional data from a preclinical study on ANAVEX®2-73 related to multiple sclerosis. Data presented indicates that ANAVEX®2-73 may promote remyelination in multiple sclerosis disease. Further, data also demonstrates that ANAVEX®2-73 provides protection for oligodendrocytes (“OL’s”) and oligodendrocyte precursor cells (“OPC’s”), as well as central nervous system neurons in addition to helping repair by increasing OPC proliferation and maturation in tissue culture.

ANAVEX PLUS showed an anticipated ADAS-Cog response of 7 points at 12 weeks and 5.5 points at 26 weeks, which represents more than 2x the ADAS-Cog of donepezil alone.3-71

ANAVEX 3-71

ANAVEX 3-71, previously named AF710B is a preclinical drug candidate with a novel mechanism of action via sigma-1 receptor activation and M1 muscarinic allosteric modulation, which has been shown to enhance neuroprotection and cognition in Alzheimer'sAlzheimer’s disease. ANAVEX 3-71 is a CNS-penetrable mono-therapy that bridges treatment of both cognitive impairments with disease modifications. It is highly effective in very small doses against the major Alzheimer'sAlzheimer’s hallmarks in transgenic (3xTg-AD) mice, including cognitive deficits, amyloid and tau pathologies, and also has beneficial effects on inflammation and mitochondrial dysfunctions. ANAVEX 3-71 indicates extensive therapeutic advantages in Alzheimer'sAlzheimer’s and other protein-aggregation-related diseases given its ability to enhance neuroprotection and cognition via sigma-1 receptor activation and M1 muscarinic allosteric modulation.

A recent preclinical study examined the response of ANAVEX 3-71 in aged transgenic animal models, and showed a significant reduction in the rate of cognitive deficit, amyloid beta pathology and inflammation with the administration of ANAVEX 3-71. In April 2016, the FDA granted Orphan Drug Designation to ANAVEX 3-71 for the treatment of Frontotemporal dementia.

In April 2017, new preclinical data was presented for ANAVEX 3-71 indicating that during pathological conditions, ANAVEX 3-71 demonstrated the formation of new synapses between neurons (synaptogenesis) without causing an abnormal increase in the number of astrocytes. In neurodegenerative diseases such as Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s disease, synaptogenesis is believed to be impaired. Additional preclinical data presented also indicates that in addition to reducing oxidative stress, ANAVEX 3-71 demonstrates protective effects of mitochondrial enzyme complexes during pathological conditions, which, if impaired, are believed to play a role in the pathogenesis of neurodegenerative and neurodevelopmental diseases. 

ANAVEX 1-41

ANAVEX 1-41 is a sigma-1 agonist. Pre-clinical tests revealed significant neuroprotective benefits (i.e., protects nerve cells from degeneration or death) through the modulation of endoplasmic reticulum, mitochondrial and oxidative stress, which damages and destroys cells and is believed by some scientists to be a primary cause of AD.impairs cell viability. In addition, in animal models, ANAVEX 1-41 prevented the expression of caspase-3, an enzyme that plays a key role in apoptosis (programmed cell death) and loss of cells in the hippocampus, the part of the brain that regulates learning, emotion and memory. These activities involve both muscarinic and sigma-1 receptor systems through a novel mechanism of action.

2


Recent preclinical data presented also indicates that ANAVEX 1-41 demonstrates protective effects of mitochondrial enzyme complexes during pathological conditions, which, if impaired, are believed to play a role in the pathogenesis of neurodegenerative and neurodevelopmental diseases. 

ANAVEX 1037

ANAVEX 1037 is designed for the treatment of prostate cancer. It is a low molecular weight, synthetic compound exhibiting high affinity for sigma-1 receptors at nanomolar levels and moderate affinity for sigma-2 receptors and sodium channels at micromolar levels. In advanced pre-clinical studies, this compound revealed antitumor potential with no toxic side effects.potential. It has also been shown to selectively kill human cancer cells without affecting normal/healthy cells and also to significantly suppress tumor growth in immune-deficient mice models. Scientific publications describe sigma receptor ligands positively, highlightinghighlight the possibility that these ligands may stop tumor growth and induce selective cell death in various tumor cell lines. Sigma receptors are highly expressed in different tumor cell types. Binding by appropriate sigma-1 and/or sigma-2 ligands can induce selective apoptosis. In addition, through tumor cell membrane reorganization and interactions with ion channels, our drug candidates may play an important role in inhibiting the processes of metastasis (spreading of cancer cells from the original site to other parts of the body), angiogenesis (the formation of new blood vessels) and tumor cell proliferation.


ANAVEX 1066

ANAVEX 1066, a mixed sigma-1/sigma-2 ligand is designed for the potential treatment of neuropathic and visceral pain. ANAVEX 1066 was tested in two preclinical models of neuropathic and visceral pain that have been extensively validated in rats. In the chronic constriction injury model of neuropathic pain, a single oral administration of ANAVEX 1066 dose-dependently restored the nociceptive threshold in the affected paw to normal levels while leaving the contralateral healthy paw unchanged. Efficacy was rapid and remained significant for two hours. In a model of visceral pain, chronic colonic hypersensitivity was induced by injection of an inflammatory agent directly into the colon and a single oral administration of ANAVEX 1066 returned the nociceptive threshold to control levels in a dose-dependent manner. Companion studies in rats demonstrated the lack of any effects on normal gastrointestinal transit with ANAVEX 1066 and a favorable safety profile in a battery of behavioral measures.

Our compounds are in the pre-clinical and clinical testing stages of development, and there is no guarantee that the activity demonstrated in pre-clinical models will be shown in human testing.

Our Target Indications

We have developed compounds with potential application to two broad categories and several specific indications. The two categories are diseases of the central nervous system, and cancer. Specific indications include:


Malignant Melanoma - Predominantly a skin cancer, malignant melanoma can also occur in melanocytes found in the bowel and the eye. Malignant melanoma accounts for 75% of all deaths associated with skin cancer. The treatment includes surgical removal of the tumor, adjuvant treatment, chemo and immunotherapy, or radiation therapy. According to IMS Health the worldwide malignant melanoma market is expected to grow to $4.4 billion by 2022.

Prostate Cancer – Specific to men, prostate cancer is a form of cancer that develops in the prostate, a gland in the male reproductive system. The cancer cells may metastasize from the prostate to other parts of the body, particularly the bones and lymph nodes. Drug therapeutics for prostate cancer are expected to increase to nearly $18.6 billion in 2017 according to BCC Research.

Pancreatic Cancer - Pancreatic cancer is a malignant neoplasm of the pancreas. In the United States, approximately 45,000 new cases of pancreatic cancer will be diagnosed this year and approximately 38,000 patients will die as a result of their cancer. Sales predictions by GBI Research forecast that the market for the pharmaceutical treatment of pancreatic cancer in the United States and five largest European countries will increase to $2.9 billion by 2021.

Competition

The pharmaceutical industry is intensely competitive.

At this time, we view our competition ascompetitors are other biomedical development companies that are trying to discover and develop compounds to be used in the treatment of Alzheimer’s disease and other CNS diseases, and those companies already doing so. Those companies include Prana BiotechnologyBiogen (NASDAQ:BIIB), Axovant Sciences Ltd. (NASDAQ:PRAN)(NYSE: AXON), Perrigo Company PLCPlc (NYSE:PRGO), Pfizer Inc. (NYSE:PFE), Actavis Plc.Allergan Plc (NYSE:ACT)AGN), Novartis AG (NYSE:NVS), GlaxoSmithKline PLCPlc (NYSE:GSK), Merck & Co. Inc. (NYSE:MRK), Eli Lilly & Co. (NYSE: LLY), Johnson & Johnson (NYSE:JNJ) and Roche Holding AG (VTX:ROG). For additional discussion of the risks related to competition, see Item 1A “Risk Factors.”

Each of our competitors have greater capital resources, larger overall research and development staffs and facilities, and a longer history in drug discovery and development, obtaining regulatory approval, and pharmaceutical product manufacturing and marketing than we do. With these additional resources, our competitors will be able to respond to the rapid and significant technological changes in the biotechnology and pharmaceutical industries faster than we can. Our future success will depend in large part on our ability to acquire funding for our research and development. To continue to acquire funding for our research and development, we will likely have to show progress toward our goals and we will eventually be expected to develop a compound that may result in a transaction with another pharmaceutical company

4


Patents, Trademarks and Intellectual Property

Anavex holds one issuedownership or exclusive rights to four U.S. patentpatents and fivenine U.S. or PCT patent applications with various international counterpart applications.applications, all of which relate to drug candidates and methods associated therewith. The most recent U.S. patent application was filed October 20, 2014. Anavex is awaiting formalin September 2017. This patent, documents fromentitled “ANAVEX®2-73 and certain anticholinesterase inhibitors composition and method for neuroprotection” claims a co-inventor ascomposition of matter of ANAVEX®2-73 directed to twoa novel and synergistic neuroprotective compound combined with donepezil and other cholinesterase inhibitors.  The issued patent offers exclusive protection through June, 2034. In addition, we also own a U.S. patent and Continuation in Part (“CiP”) entitled “Bicyclic Heterocyclic Spiro Compounds” for ANAVEX 3-71 with patent protection until January, 2030 and U.S. Patent “Sigma Receptors Ligands With Anti-Apoptotic and/or Proapoptotic Properties, Over Cellular Mechanisms Exhibiting Prototypical Cytoprotective and also Anticancer Activity” covering method of use of a compound related to ANAVEX®2-73, with patent protection until February, 2029. We also own other patent applications covering manufacturing processes, formulations and seeking one assignment fromuses that may provide additional protection of the same co-inventor to an application assigned to Anavex by another co-inventor. respective product or product candidate. 


We regard patents and other intellectual property rights as corporate assets. Accordingly, we attempt to optimize the value of intellectual property in developing our business strategy including the selective development, protection, and exploitation of our intellectual property rights.

In addition to filings made with intellectual property organizations,authorities, we protect our intellectual property and confidential information by means of carefully considered processes of communication and the sharing of information, and by the use of confidentiality and non-disclosure agreements and provisions for the same in contractor’s agreements. While no agreement offers absolute protection, such agreements provide some form of recourse in the event of disclosure, or anticipated disclosure.

Our intellectual property position, like that of many biomedical companies, is uncertain and involves complex legal and technical questions for which important legal principles are unresolved. We may file additional patent applications in the United States, or in other jurisdictions for further inventions. We may not be successful in obtaining critical claims or in protecting our potential drug compounds or processes. Even if we do obtain patents, they may not adequately protect the technology we own or have licensed. In addition, others may challenge, seek to invalidate, infringe or circumvent any patents we own or license, and rights we receive under those patents may not provide competitive advantages to us. Further, the manufacture, use or sale of our potential drug compounds may infringe the patent rights of others

Our success will also depend in part on our ability to commercialize our compounds without infringing the proprietary rights of others. We have not conducted extensive freedom of use patent searches and no assurance can be given that patents do not exist or could not be filed which would have an adverse effect on our ability to market our technology or maintain our competitive position with respectFor more information regarding challenges to our technology. If our compoundsexisting or other subject matter are claimed under other existing United States or otherfuture patents, or are otherwise protected by third party proprietary rights, we may be subject to infringement actions. In such event, we may challenge the validity of such patents or other proprietary rights or we may be required to obtain licenses from such companies in order to develop, manufacture or market our technology. There can be no assurances that we would be able to obtain such licenses or that such licenses, if available, could be obtained on commercially reasonable terms. Furthermore, the failure to either develop a commercially viable alternative or obtain such licenses could result in delays in marketing all of our potential drug compounds based on our drug technology or the inability to proceed with the development, manufacture or sale of potential drug compounds requiring such licenses, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. If we defend ourselves against charges of patent infringement or to protect our proprietary rights against third parties, substantial costs will be incurred regardless of whether we are successful. Such proceedings are typically protracted with no certainty of success. An adverse outcome could subject us to significant liabilities to third parties and force us to curtail or cease our research and development of our technology.see Item 1A “Risk Factors.”

Government Approval

Regulation by governmental authorities in the United States and foreign countries is a significant factor in the development, manufacture, and expected marketing of our potential drug compounds and in potential future research and development activities. The nature and extent to which such regulation will apply to us will vary depending on the nature of any potential drug compounds developed. We anticipate that all of our potential drug compounds will require regulatory approval by governmental agencies prior to commercialization.

5


In particular, human therapeutic products are subject to rigorous non-clinical and clinical testing and other approval procedures of the FDA and similar regulatory authorities in other countries. Various federal statutes and regulations also govern or influence testing, manufacturing, safety, labeling, storage, and record-keeping related to such products and their marketing. The process of obtaining these approvals and the subsequent compliance with the appropriate federal statutes and regulations requires substantial time and financial resources. Any failure by us or our collaboratorsFor more information regarding the risks related to obtain, or any delay in obtaining regulatory approval could adversely affect the marketing of any potential drug compounds developed by us, our ability to receive product revenues, and our liquidity and capital resources.government approvals, see Item 1A “Risk Factors.”

The steps ordinarily required before a new drug may be marketed in the United States, which are similar to steps required in most other countries, include:

non-clinical laboratory tests, non-clinical studies in animals, formulation studies and the submission to the FDA of an IND;

adequate and well-controlled clinical trials to establish the safety and efficacy of the drug;

the submission of a new drug application, or NDA, or biologic license application, or BLA, to the FDA; and

FDA review and approval of the NDA or BLA.

Non-clinical tests include laboratory evaluation of potential drug compound chemistry, formulation and toxicity, as well as animal studies. The results of non-clinical testing are submitted to the FDA as part of an investigational new drug application.IND. A 30-day waiting period after the filing of each investigational new drug applicationIND is required prior to commencement of clinical testing in humans. At any time during the 30-day period or at any time thereafter, the FDA may halt proposed or ongoing clinical trials until the FDA authorizes trials under specified terms. The investigational new drug application process may be extremely costly and substantially delay the development of our potential drug compounds. Moreover, positive results of non-clinical tests will not necessarily indicate positive results in subsequent clinical trials. The FDA may require additional animal testing after an initial investigational new drug applicationIND is approved and prior to Phase III trials.

Clinical trials to support new drug applicationsNDAs are typically conducted in three sequential phases, although the phases may overlap. During Phase I, clinical trials are conducted with a small number of subjects to assess metabolism, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacological actions and safety, including side effects associated with increasing doses. Phase II usually involves studies in a limited patient population to assess the efficacy of the drug in specific, targeted indications; assess dosage tolerance and optimal dosage; and identify possible adverse effects and safety risks.

If a compound is found to be potentially effective and to have an acceptable safety profile in Phase I and II evaluations, Phase III trials are undertaken to further demonstrate clinical efficacy and to further test for safety within an expanded patient population at geographically dispersed clinical trial sites.


After successful completion of the required clinical trials, a new drug applicationNDA is generally submitted. The FDA may request additional information before accepting the new drug applicationNDA for filing, in which case the new drug applicationNDA must be resubmitted with the additional information. Once the submission has been accepted for filing, the FDA reviews the new drug applicationNDA and responds to the applicant. The FDA’s requests for additional information or clarification often significantly extends the review process. The FDA may refer the new drug applicationNDA to an appropriate advisory committee for review, evaluation, and recommendation as to whether the new drug applicationNDA should be approved, although the FDA is not bound by the recommendation of an advisory committee.

6


Under the United States Orphan Drug Act, a sponsor may request that the FDA designate a drug intended to treat a “rare disease or condition” as an “orphan drug.” A “rare disease or condition” is one which affects less than 200,000 people in the United States, or which affects more than 200,000 people, but for which the cost of developing and making available the product is not expected to be recovered from sales of the product in the United States. Upon the approval of the first NDA or BLA for a drug designated as an orphan drug for a specified indication, the sponsor of that NDA or BLA is entitled to seven years of exclusive marketing rights in the United States unless the sponsor cannot assure the availability of sufficient quantities to meet the needs of persons with the disease. However, orphan drug status is particular to the approved indication and does not prevent another company from seeking approval of an off-patent drug that has other labeled indications that are not under orphan or other exclusivities. Orphan drugs may also be eligible for federal income tax credits for costs associated with the drugs’ development. In order to increase the development and marketing of drugs for rare disorders, regulatory bodies outside the United States have enacted regulations similar to the Orphan Drug Act.

Sales outside the United States of potential drug compounds we develop will also be subject to foreign regulatory requirements governing human clinical trials and marketing for drugs. The requirements vary widely from country to country, but typically the registration and approval process takes several years and requires significant resources. In most cases, if the FDA has not approved a potential drug compound for sale in the United States, the potential drug compound may be exported for sale outside of the United States, only if it has been approved in any one of the following: the European Union, Canada, Australia, New Zealand, Japan, Israel, Switzerland and South Africa. There are specific FDA regulations that govern this process.

Research and Development Expenses

Historically, a significant portion of our operating expenses has related to research and development. See “Financialour Consolidated Financial Statements and Supplementary Data” ofcontained elsewhere in this Annual Report for costs and expenses related to research and development, and other financial information for fiscal years 20142017, 2016 and 2013.2015.

Scientific Advisors

We are advised by scientists and physicians with experience relevant to our Company and our product candidates. In the past twelve months, our advisors included Dr. Michael Gold,Drs Harald Hampel, MD, PhD, Jacqueline French, MD, John Harrison, Ph.D., Dr,PhD, Ottavio Arancio, Dr.MD, Norman Relkin, Ph.D., Ph.D.,MD, PhD, Corinne Lasmezas, PhD, Tangui Nicolas Maurice, Ph.D.,PhD, Abraham Fisher, Ph.D., Dr.PhD, Paul Aisen, and Dr.MD, Jeffrey Cummings.Cummings, MD, Tanya Simuni, MD, Daniel Weintraub, MD.

Officers

One of our directors is engaged as an officer-employee of the Company serving in the capacity of president, secretary, treasurer, chief executive officer and chief financial officer.

Employees

We currently have four (4)ten full-time employees, and we retain several independent contractors on an as-needed basis. We believe that we have good relations with our employees.

Available Information

Our internet website address is www.anavex.com. Our Annual Reports on Form 10-K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, Current Reports on Form 8-K and amendments to those reports filed or furnished pursuant to section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act are available free of charge through our website. We include our website address in this report only as an inactive textual reference and do not intend it to be an active link to our website. The contents of our website are not incorporated into this report. 


ITEM 1 A.1A. RISK FACTORS

In addition to other information in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, the following risk factors should be carefully considered in evaluating our business because such factors may have a significant impact on our business, operating results, liquidity and financial condition. As a result of the risk factors set forth below, actual results could differ materially from those projected in any forward-looking statements. Additional risks and uncertainties not presently known to us, or that we currently consider to be immaterial, may also impact our business, operating results, liquidity and financial condition. If any such risks occur, our business, operating results, liquidity and financial condition could be materially affected in an adverse manner. Under such circumstances, the trading price of our securities could decline, and you may lose all or part of your investment.

Risks Related to our Company

7


We have had a history of losses and no revenue, which raise substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern.

Since inception on January 23, 2004 through September 30, 2014,2017, we have an accumulated deficit of $52,573,325.$91,478,558. We can offer no assurance that we will ever operate profitably or that we will generate positive cash flow in the future. To date, we have not generated any revenues from our operations. Our history of losses and no revenues raise substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern. As a result, our management expects the business to continue to experience negative cash flowflows for the foreseeable future and cannot predict when, if ever, our business might become profitable. We will need to raise additional funds, and such funds may not be available on commercially acceptable terms, if at all. If we are unable to raise funds on acceptable terms, we may not be able to execute our business plan, take advantage of future opportunities, or respond to competitive pressures or unanticipated requirements. This may seriously harm our business, financial condition and results of operations.

We are a clinicalan early stage biopharmaceuticalpharmaceutical research and development company and may never be able to successfully develop marketable products or generate any revenue. We have a very limited relevant operating history upon which an evaluation of our performance and prospects can be made. There is no assurance that our future operations will result in profits. If we cannot generate sufficient revenues, we may suspend or cease operations.

We are an early development stage company and have not generated any revenues to date and have no operating history. All of our potential drug compounds are in the concept stage or early clinical development stage. Moreover, we cannot be certain that our research and development efforts will be successful or, if successful, that our potential drug compounds will ever be approved for sales to pharmaceutical companies or generate commercial revenues. We have no relevant operating history upon which an evaluation of our performance and prospects can be made. We are subject to all of the business risks associated with a new enterprise, including, but not limited to, risks of unforeseen capital requirements, failure of potential drug compounds either in non-clinical testing or in clinical trials, failure to establish business relationships and competitive disadvantages against larger and more established companies. If we fail to become profitable, we may suspend or cease operations.

We will need additional funding and may be unable to raise additional capital when needed, which would force us to delay, reduce or eliminate our research and development activities.

We will need to raise additional funding and the current economic conditions may have a negative impact on our ability to raise additional needed capital on terms that are favorable to our Company or at all. We may not be able to generate significant revenues for several years, if at all. Until we can generate significant revenues, if ever, we expect to satisfy our future cash needs through equity or debt financing. We cannot be certain that additional funding will be available on acceptable terms, or at all. If adequate funds are not available, we may be required to delay, reduce the scope of, or eliminate one or more of our research and development activities.


Risks Related to our Business

Even if we are able to develop our potential drug compounds, we may not be able to receive regulatory approval, or if approved, we may not be able to generate significant revenues or successfully commercialize our products, which will adversely affect our financial results and financial condition and we will have to delay or terminate some or all of our research and development plans which may force us to cease operations.

8


All of our potential drug compounds will require extensive additional research and development, including non-clinical testing and clinical trials, as well as regulatory approvals, before we can market them. In particular, human therapeutic products are subject to rigorous non-clinical and clinical testing and other approval procedures of the FDA and similar regulatory authorities in other countries. Various federal statutes and regulations also govern or influence testing, manufacturing, safety, labeling, storage, and record-keeping related to such products and their marketing. We cannot predict if or when any of the potential drug compounds we intend to develop will be approved for marketing. There are many reasons that we may fail in our efforts to develop our potential drug compounds. These include:

the possibility that non-clinical testing or clinical trials may show that our potential drug compounds are ineffective and/or cause harmful side effects;

our potential drug compounds may prove to be too expensive to manufacture or administer to patients;

our potential drug compounds may fail to receive necessary regulatory approvals from the United States Food and Drug Administration or foreign regulatory authorities in a timely manner, or at all;

even if our potential drug compounds are approved, we may not be able to produce them in commercial quantities or at reasonable costs;

even if our potential drug compounds are approved, they may not achieve commercial acceptance;

regulatory or governmental authorities may apply restrictions to any of our potential drug compounds, which could adversely affect their commercial success; and

the proprietary rights of other parties may prevent us or our potential collaborative partners from marketing our potential drug compounds.

If we fail to develop our potential drug compounds, our financial results and financial condition will be adversely affected, we will have to delay or terminate some or all of our research and development plans and may be forced to cease operations.

Our research and development plans will require substantial additional future funding which could impact our operationaloperations and financial condition. Without the required additional funds, we will likely cease operations.

It will take several years before we are able tocan develop potentially marketable products, if at all. Our research and development plans will require substantial additional capital, arising from costs to:

conduct research, non-clinical testing and human studies;

establish pilot scale and commercial scale manufacturing processes and facilities; and

establish and develop quality control, regulatory, marketing, sales, finance and administrative capabilities to support these programs.

Our future operating and capital needs will depend on many factors, including:


the pace of scientific progress in our research and development programs and the magnitude of these programs;

the scope and results of pre-clinical testing and human studies;

the time and costs involved in obtaining regulatory approvals;

the time and costs involved in preparing, filing, prosecuting, securing, maintaining and enforcing patents;

competing technological and market developments;

our ability to establish additional collaborations;

changes in our existing collaborations;

the cost of manufacturing scale-up; and


the effectiveness of our commercialization activities.

We base our outlook regarding the need for funds on many uncertain variables. Such uncertainties include the success of our research initiatives, regulatory approvals, the timing of events outside our direct control such as negotiations with potential strategic partners and other factors. Any of these uncertain events can significantly change our cash requirements as they determine such one-time events as the receipt or payment of major milestones and other payments.

Additional funds will be required to support our operations and if we are unable to obtain them on favorable terms, we may be required to cease or reduce further research and development of our drug product programs, sell some or all of our intellectual property, merge with another entity or cease operations.

If we fail to demonstrate efficacy in our non-clinical studies and clinical trials our future business prospects, financial condition and operating results will be materially adversely affected.

The success of our research and development efforts will be greatly dependent upon our ability to demonstrate potential drug compound efficacy in non-clinical studies, as well as in clinical trials. Non-clinical studies involve testing potential drug compounds in appropriate non-human disease models to demonstrate efficacy and safety. Regulatory agencies evaluate these data carefully before they will approve clinical testing in humans. If certain non-clinical data reveals potential safety issues or the results are inconsistent with an expectation of the potential drug compound’s efficacy in humans, the regulatory agencies may require additional more rigorous testing before allowing human clinical trials. This additional testing will increase program expenses and extend timelines. We may decide to suspend further testing on our potential drug compounds if, in the judgment of our management and advisors, the non-clinical test results do not support further development.

Moreover, success in non-clinical testing and early clinical trials does not ensure that later clinical trials will be successful, and we cannot be sure that the results of later clinical trials will replicate the results of prior clinical trials and non-clinical testing. The clinical trial process may fail to demonstrate that our potential drug compounds are safe for humans and effective for indicated uses. This failure would cause us to abandon a drug candidate and may delay development of other potential drug compounds. Any delay in, or termination of, our non-clinical testing or clinical trials will delay the filing of an investigational new drug applicationIND and new drug applicationNDA with the Food and Drug Administration or the equivalent applications with pharmaceutical regulatory authorities outside the United States and, ultimately, our ability to commercialize our potential drug compounds and generate product revenues. In addition, we expect that our early clinical trials will involve small patient populations. Because of the small sample size, the results of these early clinical trials may not be indicative of future results. Also, the IND process may be extremely costly and may substantially delay the development of our potential drug compounds. Moreover, positive results of non-clinical tests will not necessarily indicate positive results in subsequent clinical trials.  

Following successful non-clinical testing, potential drug compounds will need to be tested in a clinical development program to provide data on safety and efficacy prior to becoming eligible for product approval and licensure by regulatory agencies. From the first human trial through to regulatory approval can take many years and 10-12 years is not unusual for certain compounds.

If any of our future clinical development potential drug compounds become the subject of problems, our ability to sustain our development programs will become critically compromised. For example, efficacy or safety concerns may arise, whether or not justified, that could lead to the suspension or termination of our clinical programs. Examples of problems that could arise include, among others:


efficacy or safety concerns with the potential drug compounds, even if not justified;

manufacturing difficulties or concerns;

regulatory proceedings subjecting the potential drug compounds to potential recall;

publicity affecting doctor prescription or patient use of the potential drug compounds;

pressure from competitive products; or

introduction of more effective treatments.


Each clinical phase is designed to test attributes of the drug and problems that might result in the termination of the entire clinical plan can be revealed at any time throughout the overall clinical program. The failure to demonstrate efficacy in our clinical trials would have a material adverse effect on our future business prospects, financial condition and operating results.

If we do not obtain the support of qualified scientific collaborators, our revenue, growth and profitability will likely be limited, which would have a material adverse effect on our business.

We will need to establish relationships with leading scientists and research institutions. We believe that such relationships are pivotal to establishing products using our technologies as a standard of care for various indications. Additionally, although in discussion, there is no assurance that our current research partners will continue to work with us or that we will be able to attract additional research partners. If we are not able to establish scientific relationships to assist in our research and development, we may not be able to successfully develop our potential drug compounds. If this happens, our business will be adversely affected.

We may not be able to develop, market or generate sales of our products to the extent anticipated. Our business may fail and investors could lose all of their investment in our Company.

Assuming that we are successful in developing our potential drug compounds and receiving regulatory clearances to market our products, our ability to successfully penetrate the market and generate sales of those products may be limited by a number of factors, including the following:

If our competitors receive regulatory approvals for and begin marketing similar products in the United States, the European Union, Japan and other territories before we do, greater awareness of their products as compared to ours will cause our competitive position to suffer;

Information from our competitors or the academic community indicating that current products or new products are more effective or offer compelling other benefits than our future products could impede our market penetration or decrease our future market share; and

The pricing and reimbursement environment for our future products, as well as pricing and reimbursement decisions by our competitors and by payers, may have an effect on our revenues.

If this happens, our business will be adversely affected.

None of our potential drug compounds may reach the commercial market for a number of reasons and our business may fail.

Successful research and development of pharmaceutical products is high risk. Most products and development candidates fail to reach the market. Our success depends on the discovery of new drug compounds that we can commercialize. It is possible that our products may never reach the market for a number of reasons. They may be found ineffective or may cause harmful side-effects during non-clinical testing or clinical trials or fail to receive necessary regulatory approvals. We may find that certain products cannot be manufactured at a commercial scale and, therefore, they may not be economical to produce. Our potential products could also fail to achieve market acceptance or be precluded from commercialization by proprietary rights of third parties. Our patents, patent applications, trademarks and other intellectual property may be challenged, and this may delay or prohibit us from effectively commercializing our products. Furthermore, we do not expect our potential drug compounds to be commercially available for a number of years, if at all. If none of our potential drug compounds reach the commercial market, our business will likely fail and investors will lose all of their investment in our Company. If this happens, our business will be adversely affected.

11



If our competitors succeed in developing products and technologies that are more effective or with a better profile than our own, or if scientific developments change our understanding of the potential scope and utility of our potential products, then our technologies and future products may be rendered undesirable or obsolete.

We face significant competition from industry participants that are pursuing technologies in similar disease states to those that we are pursuing and are developing pharmaceutical products that are competitive with our products. Nearly all of our industry competitors have greater capital resources, larger overall research and development staffs and facilities, and a longer history in drug discovery and development, obtaining regulatory approval and pharmaceutical product manufacturing and marketing than we do. With these additional resources, our competitors may be able to respond to the rapid and significant technological changes in the biotechnology and pharmaceutical industries faster than we can. Our future success will depend in large part on our ability to maintain a competitive position with respect to these technologies. Rapid technological development, as well as new scientific developments, may result in our products becoming obsolete before we can recover any of the expenses incurred to develop them. For example, changes in our understanding of the appropriate population of patients who should be treated with a targeted therapy like we are developing may limit the drug’s market potential if it is subsequently demonstrated that only certain subsets of patients should be treated with the targeted therapy.

Our reliance on third parties, such as university laboratories, contract manufacturing organizations and contract or clinical research organizations, may result in delays in completing, or a failure to complete, non-clinical testing or clinical trials if they fail to perform under our agreements with them.

In the course of product development, we may engage university laboratories, other biotechnology companies or contract or clinical manufacturing organizations to manufacture drug material for us to be used in non-clinical and clinical testing and contract research organizations to conduct and manage non-clinical and clinical studies. If we engage these organizations to help us with our non-clinical and clinical programs, many important aspects of this process have been and will be out of our direct control. If any of these organizations we may engage in the future fail to perform their obligations under our agreements with them or fail to perform non-clinical testing and/or clinical trials in a satisfactory manner, we may face delays in completing our clinical trials, as well as commercialization of any of our potential drug compounds. Furthermore, any loss or delay in obtaining contracts with such entities may also delay the completion of our clinical trials, regulatory filings and the potential market approval of our potential drug compounds.

If we fail to compete successfully with respect to partnering, licensing, mergers, acquisitions, joint venture and other collaboration opportunities, we may be limited in our ability to research and develop our potential drug compounds.

Our competitors compete with us to attract established biotechnology and pharmaceutical companies or organizations for partnering, licensing, mergers, acquisitions, joint ventures or other collaborations. Collaborations include contracting with academic research institutions for the performance of specific scientific testing. If our competitors successfully enter into partnering arrangements or license agreements with academic research institutions, we will then be precluded from pursuing those specific opportunities. Since each of these opportunities is unique, we may not be able to find a substitute. Other companies have already begun many drug development programs, which may target diseases that we are also targeting, and have already entered into partnering and licensing arrangements with academic research institutions, reducing the pool of available opportunities.

12


Universities and public and private research institutions also compete with us. While these organizations primarily have educational or basic research objectives, they may develop proprietary technology and acquire patent applications and patents that we may need for the development of our potential drug compounds. In some instances, we will attempt to license this proprietary technology, if available. These licenses may not be available to us on acceptable terms, if at all. If we are unable to compete successfully with respect to acquisitions, joint venture and other collaboration opportunities, we may be limited in our ability to develop new products.

The use of any of our products in clinical trials may expose us to liability claims, which may cost us significant amounts of money to defend against or pay out, causing our business to suffer.

The nature of our business exposes us to potential liability risks inherent in the testing, manufacturing and marketing of our products. We currently have one drug compound in clinical trials, however, when any of our products enter into clinical trials or become marketed products, they could potentially harm people or allegedly harm people possibly subjecting us to costly and damaging product liability claims. Some of the patients who participate in clinical trials are already ill when they enter a trial or may intentionally or unintentionally fail to meet the exclusion criteria. The waivers we obtain may not be enforceable and may not protect us from liability or the costs of product liability litigation. Although we intend to obtain product liability insurance which we believe is adequate, we are subject to the risk that our insurance will not be sufficient to cover claims. The insurance costs along with the defense or payment of liabilities above the amount of coverage could cost us significant amounts of money and management distraction from other elements of the business, causing our business to suffer.


The patent positions of biopharmaceutical products and processes are complex and uncertain and we may not be able to protect our patentedpatents or other intellectual property. If we cannot protect this property, we may be prevented from using it, or our competitors may use it, and our business could suffer significant harm. Also, the time and money we spend on acquiring and enforcing patents and other intellectual property will reduce the time and money we have available for our research and development, possibly resulting in a slow down or cessation of our research and development.

We hold ownership or exclusive rights to onefour issued U.S. patent and fivenine U.S. or PCT patent applications with various international counterpart applications, all of which relate to drug candidates. We are seeking the remaining rights as to one application,candidates and declarations from the same co-inventor. However, neithermethods associated therewith. Neither patents nor patent applications ensure the protection of our intellectual property for a number of reasons, including the following:

 1.

Competitors may interfere with our patenting process in a variety of ways. Competitors may claim that they invented the claimed invention priorAnavex is not entitled to us.an issued patent for a variety of legal reasons. Competitors may also claim that we are infringing their patents and restrict our freedom to operate. Competitors may also contest our patents and patent applications, if issued, by showing in various patent offices that, among other reasons, the patented subject matter was not original, was not novel or was obvious. In litigation, a competitor could claim that our patents and patent applications are not valid or enforceable for a number of reasons. If a court or, in some circumstances, a board of a national patent authority, agrees, we would lose some or all of our patent protection. As a company, we have no meaningful experience with competitors interfering with our patents or patent applications.

13



 2.

Because of the time, money and effort involved in obtaining and enforcing patents, our management may spend less time and resources on developing potential drug compounds than they otherwise would, which could increase our operating expenses and delay product programs.

 3.

Issuance of a patent may not provide muchsignificant practical protection. If we receive a patent of narrow scope, then it may be easierpossible for competitors to design products that do not infringe our patent(s).

 4.

No patents have yet been issued in the United States.

5.

Our primaryAnavex is seeking patent applicationprotection for thea number of indications, combination of ANAVEX 2-73 with donepezil is pending only in the United States Patentproducts and Trademark Office.drug regimens. The lack of patent protection in global markets for a specific end product or indication may inhibit our ability to advance our compounds and may make Anavex less attractive to potential partners.

 6.5.

Defending a patent lawsuit takes significant time and can be very expensive.

 7.6.

If a court decides that our drugan Anavex compound, its method of manufacture or use, infringes on the competitor’s patent, we may have to pay substantial damages for infringement.

 8.7.

A court may prohibit us from making, selling or licensing the potential drug compound unless the patent holder grants a license. A patent holder is not required to grant a license. If a license is available, we may have to pay substantial royalties or grant cross licenses to our patents, and the license terms may be unacceptable.

 9.8.

Redesigning our potential drug compounds so that they do not infringe on other patents may not be possible or could require substantial funds and time.

It is also unclear whether our trade secrets are adequately protected. While we use reasonable efforts to protect our trade secrets, our employees or consultants may unintentionally or willfully disclose our information to competitors. Enforcing a claim that someone illegally obtained and is using our trade secrets, like patent litigation, is expensive and time consuming, and the outcome is unpredictable. In addition, courts outside the United States are sometimes less willing to protect trade secrets. Our competitors may independently develop equivalent knowledge, methods and know-how.

We may also support and collaborate in research conducted by government organizations, hospitals, universities or other educational institutions. These research partners may be unable or unwilling to grant us exclusive rights to technology or products derived from these collaborations prior to entering into the relationship.collaborations.


If we do not obtain required intellectual property licenses or rights, we could encounter delays in our product development efforts while we attempt to design around other patents or even be prohibited from developing, manufacturing or selling potential drug compounds requiring these rights or licenses. There is also a risk that legal disputes may arise as to the rights to technology or potential drug compounds developed in collaboration with other parties.parties, all with attendant risk, distraction, expense, and lack of predictability.

We may be subject to patent infringement actions.

We may file additional patent applications in the United States, or in other jurisdictions for further inventions. We may not be successful in obtaining critical claims or in protecting our potential drug compounds or processes. Even if we do obtain patents, they may not adequately protect the technology we own or have licensed. In addition, others may challenge, seek to invalidate, infringe or circumvent any patents we own or license, and rights we receive under those patents may not provide competitive advantages to us. Further, the manufacture, use or sale of our potential drug compounds may infringe the patent rights of others.

Our substantial debt and other financial obligations could impair our financial condition andsuccess will also depend in part on our ability to fulfillcommercialize our debt obligations. Any refinancingcompounds without infringing the proprietary rights of this substantial debtothers. We have not conducted extensive freedom of use patent searches and no assurance can be given that patents do not exist or could be at significantly higher interest rates.

As of September 30, 2014, we had total liabilities of $7,160,876 and accumulated deficit of $52,573,325. Our substantial indebtedness and other current financial obligations and any that we may become a party to in the future could:


If we are unable to meet our debt service obligations and otherprospects, financial obligations, we could be forced to restructurecondition or refinance our indebtedness and other financial transactions, seek additional equity capital, sell our assets or curtail our operations. We might then be unable to obtain such financing or capital or sell our assets on satisfactory terms, if at all. Any refinancing of our indebtedness could be at significantly higher interest rates, and/or incur significant transaction fees.

In the past we have experienced material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting, which if continued, could impair our financial condition.

As reported here in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, our management concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was not effective as of September 30, 2014. Such ineffectiveness was due to material weaknesses regarding our control environment (the maintenance of sufficient personnel with an appropriate level of accounting knowledge, experience, and training in the applicable of GAAP commensurate with our financial reporting requirements, and an insufficient segregation of duties in our finance and accounting functions due to limited personnel), a lack of monitoring controls to determine the adequacy or our internal control over financial reporting and related policies, and we did not establish and maintain effective controls to ensure the correct application of GAAP related to equity transactions. Due to our size and nature, segregation of all conflicting duties has not always been possible and may not be economically feasible. We endeavor to take appropriate and reasonable steps to make improvements to remediate these deficiencies, and intend to consider the results of our remediation efforts and related testing as part of our year-end 2015 assessment of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting in light of our strategic plan and make any changes that our management deems appropriate. If we have continued material weaknesses in our internal financial reporting, our financial condition could be impaired.operations.

Risks Related to our Common Stock

A decline in the price of our common stock could affect our ability to raise further working capital and adversely impact our operations and would severely dilute existing or future investors if we were to raise funds at lower prices.

A prolonged decline in the price of our common stock could result in a reduction in our ability to raise capital. Because our operations have been financed through the sale of equity securities, a decline in the price of our common stock could be especially detrimental to our continued operations. Any reduction in our ability to raise equity capital in the future would force us to reallocate funds from other planned uses and would have a significant negative effect on our business plans and operations, including our ability to develop new products and continue our current operations. If our stock price declines, there can be no assurance that we can raise additional capital or generate funds from operations sufficient to meet our obligations. We believe the following factors could cause the market price of our common stock to continue to fluctuate widely and could cause our common stock to trade at a price below the price at which you purchase your shares of common stock:

15



actual or anticipated variations in our quarterly operating results;

announcements of new services, products, acquisitions or strategic relationships by us or our competitors;

changes in accounting treatments or principles;

changes in earnings estimates by securities analysts and in analyst recommendations; and

general political, economic, regulatory and market conditions.

The market price for our common stock may also be affected by our ability to meet or exceed expectations of analysts or investors. Any failure to meet these expectations, even if minor, could materially adversely affect the market price of our common stock.

If we issue additional shares of common stock in the future, it will result in the dilution of our existing stockholders.

Our articles of incorporation authorize the issuance of 150,000,000100,000,000 shares of common stock. Our board of directors has the authority to issue additional shares of common stock up to the authorized capital stated in the articles of incorporation. Our board of directors may choose to issue some or all of such shares of common stock to acquire one or more businesses or to provide additional financing in the future. The issuance of any such shares of common stock will result in a reduction of the book value or market price of the outstanding shares of our common stock. If we do issue any such additional shares of common stock, such issuance also will cause a reduction in the proportionate ownership and voting power of all other stockholders. Further, any such issuance may result in a change of control of our corporation.

Trading of our common stock may be volatile and sporadic, which could depress the market price of our common stock and make it difficult for our stockholders to resell their shares.

There is currently a limited market for our common stock and the volume of our common stock traded on any day may vary significantly from one period to another. Our common stock is quoted on OTC Market’s OTCQX. Trading in our stock quoted on OTC Market’s OTCQX is often thin and characterized by wide fluctuations in trading prices, due to many factors that may have little to do with our operations or business prospects. The availability of buyers and sellers represented by this volatility could lead to a market price for our common stock that is unrelated to operating performance. Moreover, OTC Market’s OTCQX is not a stock exchange, and trading of securities quoted on OTC Market’s OTCQX is often more sporadic than the trading of securities listed on a stock exchange like NASDAQ. There is no assurance that a sufficient market will develop in the stock, in which case it could be difficult for our stockholders to resell their stock.

Our stock is classed as a “penny stock.” Trading of our stock may be restricted by the Securities and Exchange Commission’s penny stock regulations which may limit a stockholder’s ability to buy and sell our stock.

Our stock is a penny stock. The Securities and Exchange Commission has adopted Rule 15g-9 which generally defines “penny stock” to be any equity security that has a market price (as defined) less than $5.00 per share or an exercise price of less than $5.00 per share, subject to certain exceptions. Our securities are covered by the penny stock rules, which impose additional sales practice requirements on broker-dealers who sell to persons other than established customers and “accredited investors.” The term “accredited investor” refers generally to institutions with assets in excess of $5,000,000 or individuals with a net worth in excess of $1,000,000 (excluding the value of the primary residence of such individuals) or annual income exceeding $200,000 or $300,000 jointly with their spouse. The penny stock rules require a broker-dealer, prior to a transaction in a penny stock not otherwise exempt from the rules, to deliver a standardized risk disclosure document in a form prepared by the Securities and Exchange Commission which provides information about penny stocks and the nature and level of risks in the penny stock market. The broker-dealer also must provide the customer with current bid and offer quotations for the penny stock, the compensation of the broker-dealer and its salesperson in the transaction and monthly account statements showing the market value of each penny stock held in the customer’s account. The bid and offer quotations, and the broker-dealer and salesperson compensation information, must be given to the customer orally or in writing prior to effecting the transaction and must be given to the customer in writing before or with the customer’s confirmation. In addition, the penny stock rules require that prior to a transaction in a penny stock not otherwise exempt from these rules; the broker-dealer must make a special written determination that the penny stock is a suitable investment for the purchaser and receive the purchaser’s written agreement to the transaction. These disclosure requirements may have the effect of reducing the level of trading activity in the secondary market for the stock that is subject to these penny stock rules. Consequently, these penny stock rules may affect the ability of broker-dealers to trade our securities. We believe that the penny stock rules discourage investor interest in and limit the marketability of our common stock.

16


The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority sales practice requirements may also limit a stockholder’s ability to buy and sell our stock.

In addition to the “penny stock” rules described above, the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority or FINRA has adopted rules that require that in recommending an investment to a customer, a broker-dealer must have reasonable grounds for believing that the investment is suitable for that customer. Prior to recommending speculative low-priced securities to their non-institutional customers, broker-dealers must make reasonable efforts to obtain information about the customer’s financial status, tax status, investment objectives and other information. Under interpretations of these rules, FINRA believes that there is a high probability that speculative low-priced securities will not be suitable for at least some customers. The FINRA requirements make it more difficult for broker-dealers to recommend that their customers buy our common stock, which may limit your ability to buy and sell our stock and have an adverse effect on the market for shares of our common stock.

The sale or issuance of our common stock to Lincoln Park may cause dilution and the sale of the shares of common stock acquired by Lincoln Park, or the perception that such sales may occur, could cause the price of our common stock to fallfall..

On July 5, 2013,October 21, 2015, we entered into a Purchase Agreement (the “Purchase Agreement”) with Lincoln Park Capital Fund, LLC (“Lincoln Park”), pursuant to which Lincoln Park committed to purchase up to $10,000,000$50,000,000 of our common stock. Concurrently with the execution of the Purchase Agreement, we issued 341,858agreed to issue 179,598 shares of our common stock to Lincoln Park as a commitment fee for its commitmentand shall issue up to purchase89,799 shares ofpro rata, when and if, Lincoln Park purchases at our common stock underdiscretion the Purchase Agreement.$50,000,000 aggregate commitment. The purchase shares that may be sold pursuant to the Purchase Agreement may beare sold by us to Lincoln Park at our discretion from time to time over a 25-month period commencing after the SEC declared effective the related registration statement.36-month period. The purchase price for the shares that we may sell to Lincoln Park under the Purchase Agreement will fluctuate based on the price of our common stock. Depending on market liquidity at the time, sales of such shares may cause the trading price of our common stock to fall.


We generally have the right to control the timing and amount of any sales of our shares to Lincoln Park, except that, pursuant to the terms of our agreements with Lincoln Park, we would be unable to sell shares to Lincoln Park if and when the closing sale price of our common stock is below $0.50$3.00 per share, subject to adjustment as set forth in the Purchase Agreement. Additional sales of our common stock, if any, to Lincoln Park will depend upon market conditions and other factors to be determined by us. Lincoln Park may ultimately purchase all of the shares of our common stock that may be sold pursuant to the Purchase Agreement and, after it has acquired shares, Lincoln Park may sell all, some or none of those shares. Therefore, sales to Lincoln Park by us could result in substantial dilution to the interests of other holders of our common stock. Additionally, the sale of a substantial number of shares of our common stock to Lincoln Park, or the anticipation of such sales, could make it more difficult for us to sell equity or equity-related securities in the future at a time and at a price that we might otherwise wish to effect sales.

17


The exercise or conversion of the Warrants and Debentures issued to Private Placement Investors and Placement Agent may cause dilution.

On March 13, 2014, we entered into a Securities Purchase Agreement (the “Securities PurchaseAgreement”) with the certain investors pursuant to which the Company agreed to sell, and the investors agreed to purchase, Senior Convertible Debentures due March 18, 2044 (the “Debentures”) in the aggregate principal amount of $10,000,000. In addition to the Debentures, we agreed to issue to the investors and the placement agent two (2) series of warrants representing the right to purchase up to an aggregate of 67,666,666 shares of the Company’s common stock (the “Warrants” and together with the Debentures, the “Securities”). The purchase and sale of the Securities was consummated on March 18, 2014, and resulted in gross proceeds to the Company in the amount of $10,000,000, before deducting agent fees and other transaction-related expenses. The exercise or conversion of the Securities could result in the dilution to the interests of other holders of our common stock.

ITEM 1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS

Not Applicable.

ITEM 2. PROPERTIES

We do not own any properties.real property. We maintain several offices of which the office at 7th7th Floor, 51 West 52nd52nd Street, New York, NY, USA which weis our main office. Our lease at a cost of $4,000costs are $10,500 per month. The lease is on a month to month basis. We believe our offices are suitable and adequate to operate our business from at this timenow as they and provide us with sufficient space to conduct our operations. We fully utilize our current premises.

ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

We know of no material existing or pending legal proceedings, other than ordinary routine litigation incidental to our business, to which we areour company or our subsidiary is a party or of which any of our propertiestheir property is the subject. In addition, we do not know of any such proceedings contemplated by any governmental authorities. We know ofThere are no proceedings in which any of our directors, officers or affiliates, or any registered or beneficial stockholder holding more than 5% of our shares, is aan adverse party adverse to our company or has a material interest adverse to our company.or our subsidiary’s interest.

ITEM 4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES

Not applicable.

18


PART II

ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES

Market information

Our common stock is quoted on the OTCQXNASDAQ Stock Market LLC (“NASDAQ”) under the symbol “AVXL.”

The following table showscontains information about the quarterly range of high and low bid informationsale prices for our common stock over the fiscal quarters for the last two fiscal years as quoted on OTCQX. We obtained the following high and low bid information from the OTC-Markets. These over-the-counter market quotations reflect inter-dealer prices without retail mark-up, mark-down or commission, and may not represent actual transactions.NASDAQ. Investors should not rely on historical prices of our common stock as an indication of its future price performance. On December 15, 2014,8, 2017, the closing price of our common stock as reported by OTCQXNASDAQ was $0.19$3.69 per share.

Quarter EndedHighLow
September 30, 2014$0.35$0.18
June 30, 2014$046$0.27
March 31, 2014$0.53$0.25
December 31, 2013$0.65$0.25
September 30, 2013$0.75$0.49
June 30, 2013$0.83$0.45
March 31, 2013$0.81$0.51
December 31, 2012$1.12$.072

Quarter EndedHighLow
September 30, 2017$5.57$3.33
June 30, 2017$6.49$5.10
March 31, 2017$6.64$3.95
December 31, 2016$4.88$2.76
September 30, 2016$8.30$2.43
June 30, 2016$6.49$3.87
March 31, 2016$6.34$3.29
December 31, 2015$14.84$3.16


Transfer Agent

Shares of our common stock are issued in registered form. The Nevada Agency and Trust Company, 50 West Liberty Street, Reno, Nevada (Telephone: (775) 322-0626; Facsimile: (775) 322-5623) is the registrar and transfer agent for shares of our common stock.

Holders of Common Stock

As of December 15, 2014,8, 2017, there were approximately 7954 holders of record of our common stock. As of such date, 54,684,905and 44,220,833 shares of our common stock were issued and outstanding.

Dividends

We have not paid any cash dividends on our common stock and have no intention of paying any dividends on the shares of our common stock. Our current policy is to retain earnings, if any, for use in our operations and in the development of our business. Our future dividend policy will be determined from time to time by our board of directors.

19


Securities Authorized for Issuance under Equity Compensation Plans or Individual Compensation Arrangements

The following table summarizes certain information regarding our equity compensation plan or individual compensation arrangements as at September 30, 2014:2017:

Equity Compensation Plan Information

Plan Category 

  

Number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options, warrants and rights
(a)

   

Weighted-average exercise price of outstanding options, warrants and rights
(b) 

   Number of securities remaining available for future issuances under equity compensation plans (excluding securities reflected in column (a))
(c)
 
             
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders  6,050,553   5.34   2,456,440 
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders         
Total  6,050,553   5.34   2,456,440 

 Equity Compensation Plan Information 






Plan Category




Number of securities
to be issued upon
exercise of
outstanding options,
warrants and rights
(a)



Weighted-average
exercise price of
outstanding options,
warrants and rights
(b)
Number of securities
remaining available
for future issuances
under equity
compensation plans
(excluding securities
reflected in column
(a))
(c)
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders3,170,0000.70830,000
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holdersNilNANA
Total3,170,0000.70830,000

Stock Option Plan

On April 17, 2007,September 18, 2015, our board of directors approved a 2015 Omnibus Incentive Plan (the “2015 Plan”), which provides for the grant of stock options and restricted stock awards to our directors, adoptedofficers, employees and consultants. The approval of the 2007 Stock Option Plan. On May 25, 2007,2015 Plan was ratified by our stockholders ratified and approved the 2007 Stock Option Plan at the annual meeting of stockholders. As of September 30, 2014, 3,170,000 options have been granted to employees, directors, officers and consultantson May 6, 2016.

The maximum number of our company.common shares reserved for issue under the plan is 6,050,553 shares subject to adjustment in the event of a change of our capitalization. As a result of the adoption of the 2015 Plan, no further option awards will be granted under any previously existing stock option plan. Stock option awards previously granted under previously existing stock option plans remain outstanding in accordance with their terms.

The purpose of the 2007 Stock Option2015 Plan is to retain the services of valued key employees and consultants of our company and such other persons as will be select in accordance with the 2007 Stock Option2015 Plan, and to encourage such persons to acquire a greater proprietary interest in our company, thereby strengthening their incentive to achieve the objectives of the shareholders of our company, and to serve as an aid and inducement in the hiring of new employees and to provide an equity incentive to consultants.

On February 2, 2011 we amended

The 2015 Plan is administered by the board of directors, except that it may, in its discretion, delegate such responsibility to a committee of such board. The exercise price will be determined by the board of directors at the time of grant, and restatedthe exercise price of each option shall be at least the fair market value on the grant date; provided, however, that in the event that a grantee owns more than 10% of our 2007common stock as of the date of grant, the exercise price of an option granted to such grantee that is intended to be an incentive stock option plan to increaseshall be not less than 110% of the numberfair market value on the date of shares authorized togrant. Stock options may be issuedgranted under the plan2015 Plan for an exercise period of up to 4,000,000.ten years from the date of grant of the option or such lesser periods as may be determined by the board, subject to earlier termination in accordance with the terms of the 2015 Plan.

Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities

20


Since the beginning of our fiscal year ended September 30, 2014,2017, we have not sold any equity securities that were not registered under the Securities Act of 1933 that were not previously reported in a quarterly report on Form 10-Q or in a current report on Form 8-K.

PurchasesRepurchases of Equity Securities by Our Company and Affiliated Purchasers

None.


ITEM 6 SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA

We are a smaller reporting company as defined by Rule 12b-2 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and are not required to provide information under this item.

  For the Years ended September 30, 
(in thousands, except per share amounts) 2017  2016  2015  2014  2013  2012 
Results of operations                  
Revenue            
Total Operating Expenses  (15,680)  (15,589)  (7,109)  (2,969)  (2,137)  (4,321)
Other income (expenses), net  2,280   882   (4,999)  (8,399)  (1,563)  (3,980)
Net loss before provision for income taxes  (13,401)  (14,707)  (12,108)  (11,368)  (3,700)  (8,301)
Income tax benefit (expense)  (60)  (30)     1,400       
Net loss and comprehensive loss  (13,460)  (14,737)  (12,108)  (9,968)  (3,700)  (8,301)
Loss per share, basic $(0.33) $(0.42) $(0.65) $(1.02) $(0.46) $(1.18)
Loss per share, diluted $(0.33) $(0.42) $(0.65) $(1.02) $(0.48) $(1.16)
Weighted average number of shares outstanding  40,841   35,153   18,585   9,805   7,977   7,042 
                         
Financial Condition                        
Cash and cash equivalents  27,440   9,187   15,291   7,262   345   11 
Total assets  27,838   9,499   15,470   7,354   393   13 
Long term debt           5,720   904    
Shareholders’ equity  24,254   6,308   12,809   193   (2,463)  (2,875)

ITEM 7 MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATION

The following discussion should be read in conjunction with our audited consolidated financial statements and notes thereto for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2014,2017, included elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. The following Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations contains “forward-looking statements”. Forward-looking statements are generally written in the future tense and/or are preceded by words such as “may,” “should,” “forecast,” “could,” “expect,” “suggest,” “believe,” “anticipate,” “intend,” “plan,” or other similar words. The forward-looking statements contained in this Annual Report on Form 10-K involve a number of risks and uncertainties, many of which are outside of our control. Factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from projected results include, but are not limited to, those discussed in “Risk Factors” elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Readers are expressly advised to review and consider those Risk Factors, which include risks associated with (1) our ability to successfully conduct clinical and preclinical trials for our product candidates, (2) our ability to obtain required regulatory approvals to develop and market our product candidates, (3) our ability to raise additional capital on favorable terms, (4) our ability to execute our development plan on time and on budget, (5) our ability to obtain commercial partners, (6) our ability, whether alone or with commercial partners, to successfully commercialize any of our product candidates that may be approved for sale, and (7) our ability to identify and obtain additional product candidates. Although we believe that the assumptions underlying the forward-looking statements contained in this Annual Report on Form 10-K are reasonable, any of the assumptions could be inaccurate, and therefore there can be no assurance that such statements will be accurate. In light of the significant uncertainties inherent in the forward-looking statements included herein, the inclusion of such information should not be regarded as a representation by us or any other person that the results or conditions described in such statements or our objectives and plans will be achieved. Furthermore, past performance in operations and share price is not necessarily indicative of future performance. Except as required by applicable laws including the securities laws of the United States and Canada, we disclaim any intention or obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.

21


Our Business

We are

Anavex Life Sciences Corp. is a clinical stage biopharmaceutical company engaged in the development of differentiated therapeutics for the treatment of neurodegenerative and neurodevelopmental diseases including drug candidates to treat Alzheimer’s disease, other central nervous system (CNS)(“CNS”) diseases, pain and various types of cancer. Our lead compoundscompound, ANAVEX®2-73, and ANAVEX PLUS, a combination of ANAVEX 2-73 with donepezil (Aricept®) areis being developed to treat Alzheimer’s disease, Parkinson’s disease and potentially other central nervous system (CNS) diseases.diseases, including rare diseases, such as Rett syndrome.

In December 2014November 2016, a Phase 2a clinical trial, consisting of PART A and PART B, which lasted a total of 57 weeks, was initiatedcompleted for ANAVEX®2-73 which is being evaluated for the treatment ofin mild-to-moderate Alzheimer’s disease. Thepatients. This open-label randomized trial ismet both primary and secondary endpoints, and was designed to assess the safety and exploratory efficacy of ANAVEX®2-73 alone as well as in combination with donepezil (ANAVEX PLUS) in patients with mild to moderate Alzheimer’s disease.32 patients. ANAVEX®2-73 targets sigma-1 and muscarinic receptors, which have been shown in preclinical studies to reduce stress levels in the brain believed to restore cellular homeostasis and to reverse the pathological hallmarks observed in Alzheimer’s disease. In October 2017, we presented pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacodynamic (PD) data from its positive Phase 2a study, which established a concentration-effect relationship between ANAVEX®2-73 showed no serious adverse eventsand study measurements. These measures obtained from all patients who participated in the full 57 weeks include exploratory cognitive and functional scores as well as biomarker signals of brain activity. Additionally, ANAVEX®2-73 activity appears to be enhanced by its active metabolite (ANAVEX19-144), which also targets the sigma-1 receptor and has a previously performedhalf-life approximately twice as long as the parent molecule. 

In March 2016, we received approval from the Ethics Committee in Australia to extend the Phase 1 study. 2a clinical trial, which had been requested by patients and their caregivers.  The trial extension allows participants who completed the 52-week PART B of the study to roll-over into a new trial and continue taking ANAVEX®2-73 for an additional 104 weeks, providing an opportunity to gather extended safety data.  The trial is independent of our planned larger Phase 2/3 double-blind, placebo-controlled study of ANAVEX®2-73 in Alzheimer’s disease.


In pre-clinical studiesFebruary 2016, we presented positive preclinical data for ANAVEX®2-73 in Rett syndrome, a rare neurodevelopmental disease. The study was funded by the Rettsyndrome.org foundation. In January 2017, we were awarded a financial grant from the Rettsyndrome.org foundation of a minimum of $0.6 million towards covering the costs of a planned U.S. multicenter Phase 2 clinical trial of ANAVEX®2-73 for the treatment of Rett syndrome. The Phase 2 trial is scheduled to begin following the FDA’s approval of the Company’s IND application and will be a randomized, double blind, placebo-controlled study of ANAVEX®2-73 in patients with Rett syndrome lasting up to 12 weeks. Primary and secondary endpoints include safety as well as Rett syndrome conditions such as cognitive impairment, motor impairment, behavioral symptoms and seizure activity.

In September 2016, we presented positive preclinical data for ANAVEX®2-73 in Parkinson’s disease, which demonstrated anti-amnesicsignificant improvements on all measures: behavioral, histopathological, and neuroprotective propertiesneuroinflammatory endpoints. The study was funded by the Michael J Fox Foundation. Additional data was announced in various animal models includingOctober 2017 from the transgenic mouse model Tg2576.for experimental parkinsonism which indicates that ANAVEX®2-73 induces robust neurorestoration in experimental parkinsonism. The encouraging results gathered in this model, coupled with the favorable profile of the compound in the Alzheimer’s disease trial, support the notion that ANAVEX®2-73 is a promising clinical candidate drug for Parkinson’s disease.

We intend to identify and initiate discussions with potential commercial partners inwithin the next 12 months. Further, we may acquire or develop new intellectual property and assign, license, or otherwise transfer our intellectual property to further our goals.

Recent Corporate DevelopmentsFinancial Highlights

Since the commencement

We had cash and cash equivalents of our fourth quarter endedapproximately $27.4 million at September 30, 2014, we have experienced2017, compared to approximately $9.2 million at September 30, 2016. The increase in cash is primarily a result of the following significant corporate developments:

RESULTS OF OPERATIONSOperations

22


Revenue

We are in the development stage and have not earned any revenues since our inception on January 23, 2004. We are still in the development stage2004 and we do not anticipate earning any revenues until we can establish an alliance with other companies to develop, co-develop, license, acquire or market our products.


Year ended September 30, 2017 compared to year ended September 30, 2016

Operating Expenses

Our operating expenses for fiscal 2017 were approximately $15.7 million, which was an increase of $0.1 million as compared to fiscal 2016. 

In fiscal 2017, our general and administrative expenses decreased by $3.3 million, or 39.9% compared to fiscal 2016 This decrease was mainly attributable to a decrease in one-time compensation related charges, including share based compensation charges, as well as a decrease in legal fees. The decrease in legal fees was a result of financing and reporting activities in fiscal 2016.

These decreases in general and administrative expenses were offset by an increase in research and development expenses. Our research and development expenses for fiscal 2017 were approximately $10.7 million as compared to approximately $7.3 million for fiscal 2016, which represents an increase of 47%. The increase was associated with expenditures incurred in preparation of our planned clinical studies for ANAVEX®2-73, and an increase in preclinical activities for ANAVEX®3-71 and ANAVEX®1066. 

Salaries and wages, excluding share based compensation, decreased by $2.6 million, or 58%, in fiscal 2017 as a result of one-time charges incurred in fiscal 2016 associated with the vesting of restricted stock awards. We continue to expand our team with the addition of scientific staff and support staff. We incurred non-cash stock based compensation charges of $4.1 million, compared to $5.1 million during fiscal 2016, associated with the vesting of stock options to management, employees and consultants, as part of long term compensation packages. 

During fiscal 2017, our legal fees decreased to $0.6 million, from $1.3 million during fiscal 2016. This decrease was as a result of financing and SEC related activities during fiscal 2016 that did not recur in fiscal 2017.

Other income (expenses)

The aggregate amount in the other income for the year ended September 30, 2014 were $2,968,975, which represents an increase of $831,6082017, amounted to $2.3 million as compared to $2,137,367$0.9 million for the year ended September 30, 2013. 2016.

The largest reason for the increase in other income was the receipt during fiscal 2017 of $2.0 million in connection with a research and development incentive program offered by the Australian Tax Office, or the ATO, as compared to $0.6 million during fiscal 2016. This amount is granted by the ATO in relation to eligible expenditures incurred in Australia in respect of our clinical trials, and other auxiliary research, and is generally a function of expenditures incurred in Australia. In addition, we received a research grant from the Michael J. Fox Foundation, or the MJFF, to develop ANAVEX®2-73 for the treatment of Parkinson’s disease. The MJFF research grant of $0.29 million was received over a period of two years to July 2017 and was recognized as income as the related expenditures were incurred. During each of the years ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, we recognized $0.14 million of this grant on our statement of operations.

Year ended September 30, 2016 compared to year ended September 30, 2015

Operating Expenses

Our operating expenses for fiscal 2016 were approximately $15.6 million which as an increase of 119.3% compared to approximately $7.1 million in fiscal 2015.

The increase was mainly attributable to (i) an increase in investor relations expenses and other professional fees and bonus payment as a result of our capital raising efforts related to a $10,000,000 convertible Debenture financing, which resulted in one-time compensation charges in the aggregate amount of $1,010,000, including a non-cash charge of $610,000 for the vesting of common stock under our President’s employment agreement and (ii) an increase in research and development activitiesexpenses, as well as an increase in the current year,salaries and wages, including clinical trial work,non-cash stock based compensation charges.

Our research and development expenses for fiscal 2016 were approximately $7.3 million as compared to approximately $2.3 million for fiscal 2015, which represents an increase of 219.3%. Our research and development expenses have increased significantly as a result of funding secured.an increase in expenses related to our Phase 2a clinical trial for ANAVEX®2-73 for Alzheimer’s disease, which commenced in December 2014; and a significant increase in preclinical activities undertaken for ANAVEX®2-73 for other CNS indications.


Salaries and wages increased as a result of our expanded team. In fiscal 2016, we incurred non-cash stock based compensation charges of $5.1 million associated with the vesting of stock options and restricted stock units issued to directors and officers, management and employees as part of long term compensation packages. In addition, we incurred other non-recurring compensation charges associated with the vesting of restricted stock awards to our CEO, in connection with the achievement of certain performance milestones stipulated in his 2013 employment agreement.

During fiscal 2016, we also incurred an increase in legal fees as a result of financing and SEC related activities.

Other income (expenses)

The aggregate amount in the other income (expense) for the year ended September 30, 2014,fiscal 2016, amounted to $(8,399,378)$0.9 million as compared to $(1,562,679)$(5.0) million for the comparable year ended September 30, 2013. 2015.

The largest singlereason for the increase in this lossother income was as a result of certain non-cash, non-operational accounting charges related to certain amendments toa $0.7 million in grant income received during the Debentures.

Generally accepted accounting principlesperiod. We received other income in the United States (US GAAP) accounting rules deemed the amendments to the termsamount of the Debentures to require extinguishment accounting to be applied to them. This resulted in a net non-cash, non-operational accounting charge being recorded in our consolidated statement of operations of $8,099,137, net of the recovery$0.6 million as part of a finance chargeresearch and development incentive program offered by the Australian government, in connection with eligible expenditures on our Phase 2a clinical trial, which was conducted in Australia. In addition, we received a research grant of $459,912, being$0.29 million from the total accrued liquidating damages owedMJFF to develop ANAVEX® 2-73 for the holderstreatment of the convertible debentures at the date of the amendment, though these amounts were satisfied through the modification of the conversion price.

Further, we do not have a sufficient number of authorized and unissued shares of common stock available to satisfy the additional shares that could be issued under the terms of the Debentures. As a result, US GAAP accounting rules require that we account for such shares underlying the Debentures as derivative liabilities. It is the requirement of these accounting rules, that we re-measure derivative financial instruments to their respective fair values at each reporting period, with the changes in fair value being reported as a non-operating item on the consolidated statement of operations. Consequently, we were required to record non-cash, non-operational gains related to the change in the calculated value of derivative liabilities of $2,955,000 forParkinson’s disease. During the year ended September 30, 2014.

These accounting charges did not result in an actual cash impact2016, we recognized $0.14 million of this grant on our Company. Removing the effect of all financing related accelerated charges and adjustments to our consolidated statement of operations, resultsoperations.

In addition, there was a decrease in financing-related charges as a net lossresult of $(2,760,714), or $(0.09) per share, as shown below:the conversion of a majority of the remaining principal balance on outstanding convertible debentures during the third and fourth quarter of fiscal 2015.

23



  As Reported  Net impact  Adjusted 
Operating expenses         
General and administrative$ 2,236,580    $ 2,236,580 
Research and development 732,395     732,395 
          
Total operating expenses (2,968,975) -  (2,968,975)
          
Other income (expenses)         
Interest and finance expenses, net (7,089)    (7,089)
Gain on settlement of accounts payable 199,655     199,655 
Financing related charges and adjustments (8,624,986) 8,607,639  (17,347)
Foreign exchange loss 33,042     33,042 
          
Total other income (expenses), net (8,399,378) 8,607,639  208,261 
          
Net loss and comprehensive loss for the period$ (11,368,353)$ 8,607,639 $ (2,760,714)
          
Loss per share - diluted$ (0.30)   $ (0.09)

 

Net loss and comprehensive loss - GAAP basis$ (11,368,353)
Add back:
   Non-cash financing related charged and adjustments8,607,639
Net loss and comprehensive loss - Non-GAAP basis$ (2,760,714)

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Working Capital

  2014  2013 
Current Assets$ 7,351,255 $ 393,449 
Current Liabilities 1,441,149  1,952,660 
Working Capital (Deficiency)$ 5,910,106 $ (1,559,211)

  2017  2016 
Current Assets $27,785,933  $9,446,285 
Current Liabilities  3,584,334   3,190,525 
Working Capital $24,201,599  $6,255,760 

As of September 30, 2014,2017, we had $7,262,138$27.4 million in cash and cash equivalents, an increase of $6,917,064$18.3 million, from $9.2 million at September 30, 2013.2016. The principal reason for this increase is due tothe $27.3 million in cash received in respect offrom the issuance of shares of common stock under the DebenturesPurchase Agreement. In our second fiscal quarter, we also received approximately $2.0 million in other income as part of a research and development incentive program offered by the aggregate principal amount of $10,000,000 that were issued in the current year. We intend to use the funds from these Debentures to implement our plan of operation of researching and developing our compounds, the related patents and any further intellectual property we may acquire. ATO.

We intend to use the majority of our capital resources to complete the next clinical trialtrials for ANAVEX®2-73, and ANAVEX PLUS, and to perform work necessary to prepare for further clinical development.

24


Cash Flows

  2016  2016  2015 
Cash flows used in operating activities $(9,017,231) $(9,236,823) $(4,227,006)
Cash flows used in investing activities         
Cash flows provided by financing activities  27,270,674   3,132,661   12,255,844 
Increase (decrease) in cash $18,253,443  $(6,104,162) $8,028,838 


Cash Flows      
  2014  2013 
 Cash flows used in operating activities$ (2,659,379)$ (777,573)
 Cash flows used in investing activities (3,015) - 
 Cash flows provided by financing activities 9,579,458  1,111,285 
 Increase in cash$ 6,917,064 $ 333,712 

Cash flow used in operating activities

Our

There was a small decrease in cash used in operating activities for the year ended September 30, 2014 was $2,659,379of $0.2 million during fiscal 2017 as compared to $777,573 usedfiscal 2016. This decrease is primarily due to the increase in operating activities for the comparative year ended September 30, 2013. other income received during fiscal 2017, as described above.

The increase in cash used in operating activities during fiscal 2016 as compared to fiscal 2015 was primarily as a result of the increased net loss for the current periodresearch and development activities offset by a decrease in internal staffing costs, as more fully described above, and as a result of an increasenon-recurring tax payments made on behalf of a director and officer in corporate activities and research and development following the Debenture financing in March, 2014.accordance with a 2013 employment agreement.

Cash used in investing activities

Cash used in investing activities was $3,015 in the current year ended September 30, 2014. This is as a result of small equipment purchases in the current year.

Cash flow provided by financing activities

Our cash

Cash provided by financing activities for the year ended September 30, 2014fiscal 2017 was $9,579,458, mostly attributablerelated to cash received from the issuance of the Debentures in the aggregate principal amount of $10,000,000, less related fees and expenses of $788,712 incurred in connection with the closing of these Debentures. We also received cash from the issuance of common shares under the Purchase Agreement with Lincoln Park Capital Fund, LLC (described under Other Financing below).

In the comparative year ended September 30, 2013,Park. During fiscal 2017, we hadissued 7.1 million shares for gross proceeds of $27.3 million. During fiscal 2016, cash inflows of $1,111,285flows from financing activities also related to the exercise of outstanding share purchase warrants.

Cash provided by financing activities for fiscal 2015 was primarily attributable to cash received pursuant to the exercise of outstanding share purchase warrants and cash from the issuance of short term debt andcommon shares under a private placement equity financings.

Other Financing

Onpurchase agreement entered into with Lincoln Park on July 5, 2013, the Company entered into a Purchase Agreement (“Purchase Agreement”) with Lincoln Park Capital Fund, LLC (“Lincoln Park”). Pursuantpursuant to the Purchase Agreement,which Lincoln Park initially purchased 250,000 shares of the Company’sour common stock for $100,000. During the nine months ended June 30, 2014,$100,000 and we issued an aggregate of 402,510 shares of common stock under the Purchase Agreement, including 400,000 shares of common stock for an aggregate purchase price of $188,170 and 2,510 commitment shares.

The Company hashad the right, in itsour sole discretion over a 25-month period, to sell to Lincoln Park up to the additional aggregate commitment of $9.9 Millionmillion of shares of common stock. There are no upper limits

Other Financings

$50 Million Lincoln Park Purchase Agreement

On October 21, 2015, we entered into a Purchase Agreement (the “Purchase Agreement”) with Lincoln Park, pursuant to which Lincoln Park committed to purchase up to $50,000,000 of our common stock. Concurrently with the execution of the Purchase Agreement, we issued 179,598 shares of our common stock to Lincoln Park as a fee for its commitment to purchase shares of our common stock under the Purchase Agreement and shall issue up to 89,799 shares pro rata, when and if Lincoln Park purchases, at our discretion, the $50,000,000 aggregate commitment. The purchase shares that may be sold pursuant to the Purchase Agreement may be sold by us to Lincoln Park at our discretion from time to time over a 36-month period commencing after the SEC declared effective the related registration statement.

We may direct Lincoln Park, at its sole discretion, and subject to certain conditions, to purchase up to 50,000 shares of common stock on any business day, provided that at least one business day has passed since the per share pricemost recent purchase. The amount of a purchase may be increased under certain circumstances provided, however that Lincoln Park may pay toPark’s committed obligation under any single purchase such common stock. Furthermore, the Company controls the timing and amount of any future sales, if any,shall not exceed $2,000,000. The purchase price of shares of common stock to Lincoln Park except that, pursuantrelated to the termsfuture funding will be based on the then prevailing market prices of such shares at the Purchase Agreement, we would be unable to sell shares to Lincoln Park if and when the closing sale pricetime of our common stock is below $0.50 per share, subject to adjustmentsales as set forthdescribed in the Purchase Agreement. Lincoln Park has no right to require any sales and is obligated to purchase common stock as directed by the Company.

25


Other than our rights related to the Lincoln Park financing, there can be no assurance that additional financing will be available to us when needed or, if available, that it can be obtained on commercially reasonable terms. If we are not able to obtain the additional financing on a timely basis, if and when it is needed, we will be forced to delay or scale down some or all of our research and development activities or perhaps even cease the operation of our business.

We expect that we will be able to continue to fund our operations for the next 12 months through existing cash on hand and through equity and debt financingsfinancing in the future. If we raise additional financing by issuing equity securities, our existing stockholders’ ownership will be diluted. Obtaining commercial loans, assuming those loans would be available, willwould increase our liabilities and future cash commitments.


Contractual Obligations and Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

We have no off-balance sheet arrangements that have or are reasonably likely

The following table summarizes our contractual obligations as of September 30, 2017, excluding amounts related to have a current or future effect on our financial condition, changes in financial condition, revenues or expenses, resultsuncertain tax positions, funding commitments, contingent development, regulatory and commercial milestone payments:

  Payments Due by Period 
Contractual Obligations Total  Less than 1 year  1-3 years  4 - 5 years  After 5 years 
Long-Term Debt               
Capital Lease Obligations               
Operating Leases $172,783  $115,189  $57,594       
Unconditional Purchase Obligations               
Other Long-Term Obligations               
Total Contractual Cash Obligations $172,783  $115,189  $57,594       

Application of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources that is material to our stockholders.Critical Accounting Policies

APPLICATION OF CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Our financial statements and accompanying notes are prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States. Preparing financial statements requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenue and expenses. These estimates and assumptions are affected by management’s application of accounting policies. We believe that understanding the basis and nature of the estimates and assumptions involved with the following aspects of our financial statements is critical to an understanding of our financials.financial statements.

We base our assumptions and estimates on historical experience and other sources that we believe to be reasonable at the time. Actual results may vary from our estimates due to changes in circumstances, weather, politics, global economics, mechanical problems, general business conditions and other factors. Our significant estimates are related to the valuation of warrants and options.

There are accounting policies that we believe are significant to the presentation of our financial statements. The most significant of these accounting policies relates to the accounting for our research and development expenses and stock-based compensation expense.expense and derivative liabilities.

Research and Development Expenses

Research and developments costs are expensed as incurred. These expenses are comprised of the costs of our proprietary research and development efforts, including salaries, facilities costs, overhead costs and other related expenses as well as costs incurred in connection with third-party collaboration efforts. Milestone payments made by us to third parties are expensed when the specific milestone has been achieved.

In addition, we incur expenses in respect of the acquisition of intellectual property relating to patents and trademarks. The probability of success and length of time into developing commercial applications of the drugs subject to the acquired patents and trademarks is difficult to determine and numerous risks and uncertainties exist with respect to the timely completion of the development projects. There is no assurance the acquired patents and trademarks will ever be successfully commercialized. Due to these risks and uncertainties, we expense the acquisition of patents and trademarks.

26



Stock-based Compensation

We account for all stock-based payments and awards under the fair value based method.

Stock-based payments to non-employees are measured at the fair value of the consideration received, or the fair value of the equity instruments issued, or liabilities incurred, whichever is more reliably measurable. The fair value of stock-based payments to non-employees is periodically re-measured until the counterparty performance is complete, and any change therein is recognized over the vesting period of the award and in the same manner as if we had paid cash instead of paying with or using equity based instruments. Compensation costs for stock-based payments with graded vesting are recognized on a straight-line basis. The cost of the stock-based payments to non-employees that isare fully vested and non-forfeitable as at the grant date is measured and recognized at that date, unless there is a contractual term for services in which case such compensation would be amortized over the contractual term.

We account for the granting of share purchase options to employees using the fair value method whereby all awards to employees will be recorded at fair value on the date of the grant. The fair value of all share purchase options are expensed over their vesting period with a corresponding increase to additional capital surplus. Upon exercise of share purchase options, the consideration paid by the option holder, together with the amount previously recognized in additional capital surplus, is recorded as an increase to share capital.

We use the Black-Scholes option valuation model to calculate the fair value of share purchase options at the date of the grant. Option pricing models require the input of highly subjective assumptions, including the expected price volatility. Changes in assumptions can materially affect the fair value estimate and therefore the Black-Scholes model does not necessarily provide a reliable single measure of the fair value of our share purchase options.

Derivative Liabilities

From time to time, we may issue convertible promissory notes which include embedded conversion options which, dependent on their specific contractual terms, may be required to be accounted for as separate derivative liabilities. These liabilities are required to be measured at fair value. These instruments are then adjusted to reflect fair value at each period end. Any increase or decrease in the fair value is recorded in resultsFor a discussion of operations as change in fair value of derivative liabilities. In determining the appropriate fair value, we use the binomial pricing model because these instruments are not quoted on an active market.

Option pricing models require the input of highly subjective assumptions, including the expected price volatility. Changes in assumptions can materially affect the fair value estimate and therefore the binomial model does not necessarily provide a reliable single measure of the fair value of these instruments.

27


Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In June 2014, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Updated No. 2014-10, "Development Stage Entities” (“ASU 2014-10”) which removes the definition of a development stage entity from the Master Glossary of the Accounting Standards Codification, thereby removing the financial reporting distinction between development stage entities and other reporting entities from U.S. GAAP. In addition, the update eliminates the requirements for development stage entities to (1) present inception-to-date information in the statements of income, cash flows, and shareholder equity, (2) label the financial statements as those of a development stage entity, (3) disclose a description of the development stage activities in which the entity is engaged, and (4) disclose in the first year in which the entity is no longer a development stage entity that in prior years it had been in the development stage. During the year ended September 30, 2014, we elected to early adopt ASU 2014-10. The adoption of this ASU allowed our company to remove the inception to date information and all references to development stage.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements Not Yet Adopted

In June 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-12, Accounting for Share-Based Payments When the Terms of an Award Provide That a Performance Target Could Be Achieved after the Requisite Service Period ("ASU 2014-12"). ASU 2014-12 requires that a performance target that affects vesting, and that could be achieved after the requisite service period, be treated as a performance condition. As such, the performance target should not be reflected in estimating the grant date fair value of the award. This update further clarifies that compensation cost should be recognized in the period in which it becomes probable that the performance target will be achieved and should represent the compensation cost attributable to the period(s) for which the requisite service has already been rendered. The amendments in this ASU are effective for annual periods and interim periods within those annual periods beginning after December 15, 2015. We are currently evaluating the impact this guidance on our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.

In August 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-15, Disclosure of Uncertainties about an Entity’s Ability to Continue as a Going Concern (“ASU 2014-15”). ASU 2014-15 will explicitly require management to assess an entity’s ability to continue as a going concern, and to provide related footnote disclosure in certain circumstances. The new standard will be effective for all entities in the first annual period ending after December 15, 2016. We are currently evaluating the impact this guidance on our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.

In May, 2014, the FASB and the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) issued a converged standard on revenue recognition from contracts with customers, ASU 2014-09 (Topic 606 and IFRS 15). This standard will supersede nearly all existing revenue recognition guidance. ASU 2014-09 is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2016. The Company is currently evaluating the impact this guidance will have on its financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.

Other than noted above, we do not expect the adoption of recently issuedrecent accounting pronouncements to have a significant impactand their possible effect on our results, of operations, financial position or cash flow.see Note 2(n) to our Consolidated Financial Statements found elsewhere in this Annual Report.

ITEM 7A QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

We are exposed to a smaller reporting companyvariety of market risks, including interest rate risk and foreign currency exchange risk.

Interest Rate Risk

We invest a major portion of our cash surplus in bank deposits in the United States and, to a lesser extent, Australia. Since the bank deposits typically carry fixed interest rates, financial income over the holding period is not sensitive to changes in interest rates, but only the fair value of these instruments. However, our interest gains from future deposits could decline in the future as defined by Rule 12b-2a result of changes in the financial markets. In any event, given the historic low levels of the Securitiesinterest rate, we estimate that a decline in the interest rate we are currently receiving will not result in a material adverse effect to our business.

Foreign Currency Exchange ActRisk

A significant portion of 1934our expenditures, including clinical research expenses relate to our operations in Australia and a portion of our consultancy expenses are not requiredincurred in Euros. The cost of those expenses, as expressed in US dollars, is influenced by the exchange rate of these currencies against the US Dollar. If the US dollar declines in value in relation to provide information underthese currencies, it will become more expensive for us to fund our operations. A 10% change in exchange rate with the Australian dollar would result in less than a $10,000 impact on our expenses. To limit this item.risk, the Company holds minimal cash reserves in Australian Dollars and Euros.


ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA

28


 

ANAVEXANAVEX LIFE SCIENCES CORP.

CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

September 30, 2014 and 2013

(Stated in US Dollars)2017

 

 



Tel: 212-885-8000
Fax: 212-697-1299
www.bdo.com
100 Park Avenue
New York, NY 10017

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm


Board of Directors and Stockholders

Anavex Life Sciences Corp.

New York, New York

We have audited Anavex Life Sciences Corp.’s internal control over financial reporting as of September 30, 2017, based on criteria established inInternal Control – Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (the COSO criteria). Anavex Life Sciences Corp.’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying “Item 9A, Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting”. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audit also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

In our opinion, Anavex Life Sciences Corp. maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of September 30, 2017, based on the COSO criteria.

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheets of Anavex Life Sciences Corp. as of September 30, 2017 and 2016, and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended September 30, 2017 and our report dated December 11, 2017 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.

/s/ BDO USA, LLP

New York, New York

December 11, 2017

BDO USA, LLP, a Delaware limited liability partnership, is the U.S. member of BDO International Limited, a UK company limited by guarantee, and forms part of the international BDO network of independent member firms.

BDO is the brand name for the BDO network and for each of the BDO Member Firms.

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

Board of Directors and Stockholders

Anavex Life Sciences Corp.

New York, NY

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Anavex Life Sciences Corp. as of September 30, 20142017 and 20132016 and the related consolidated statements of operations, cash flows, and changes in stockholders’ equity, (capital deficit)and cash flows for each of the twothree years in the period ended September 30, 2014.2017. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our audits included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Anavex Life Sciences Corp. at September 30, 20142017 and 2013,2016, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the twothree years in the period ended September 30, 20142017, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), Anavex Life Sciences Corp.’s internal control over financial reporting as of September 30, 2017, based on criteria established inInternal Control – Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) and our report dated December 11, 2017 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.

/s/ BDO USA, LLP

New York, NYNew York

December 29, 201411, 2017

 

BDO USA, LLP, a Delaware limited liability partnership, is the U.S. member of BDO International Limited, a UK company limited by guarantee, and forms part of the international BDO network of independent member firms.
BDO is the brand name for the BDO network and for each of the BDO Member Firms.

F-1BDO USA, LLP, a Delaware limited liability partnership, is the U.S. member of BDO International Limited, a UK company limited by guarantee, and forms part of the international BDO network of independent member firms.


BDO is the brand name for the BDO network and for each of the BDO Member Firms.

ANAVEXLIFESCIENCESCORP.

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

September 30, 20142017 and 2013

 2014  2013 
       
 ASSETS 
       
Current      
   Cash$7,262,138 $345,074 
   Prepaid expenses 89,117  48,375 
  7,351,255  393,449 
Equipment 2,247   
 $7,353,502 $393,449 
       
LIABILITIES 
       
Current      
   Accounts payable and accrued liabilities$1,249,084 $1,741,797 
   Promissory notes payable 192,065  210,863 
  1,441,149  1,952,660 
Non–interest bearing liabilities 5,719,727  904,000 
  7,160,876  2,856,660 
    
STOCKHOLDERS'EQUITY(CAPITAL DEFICIT) 
       
Capital stock      
   Authorized:
      150,000,000 common shares, par value $0.001 per share
   Issued and outstanding:
      47,200,237 common shares (September 30, 2013 – 37,237,588)
 47,201  37,238 
Additional paid–in capital 52,078,750  38,644,523 
Common stock to be issued 640,000  60,000 
Accumulated deficit (52,573,325) (41,204,972)
  192,626  (2,463,211)
 $7,353,502 $393,449 

SEE ACCOMPANYING NOTES2016

F-2


       
  2017  2016 
       
Assets        
Current        
Cash and cash equivalents $27,440,257  $9,186,814 
Sales tax recoverable  9,748   79,347 
Prepaid expenses  335,928   180,124 
   27,785,933   9,446,285 
Deposits  52,396   52,396 
Total Assets $27,838,329  $9,498,681 
         
Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity        
Current        
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities $3,584,334  $3,119,993 
Deferred grant income     70,532 
Total Liabilities  3,584,334   3,190,525 
         
Commitments - Note 6        
         
Capital stock        
Authorized:        
100,000,000 common shares, par value $0.001 per share        
Issued and outstanding:        
43,330,817 common shares (September 30, 2016 - 36,168,299)  43,332   36,169 
Additional paid-in capital  115,689,221   84,290,140 
Accumulated deficit  (91,478,558)  (78,018,153)
Total Stockholders’ Equity  24,253,995   6,308,156 
 Total Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity $27,838,329  $9,498,681 

See Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements


ANAVEXLIFESCIENCESCORP.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
for

For the years ended September 30, 20142017, 2016 and 2013

  2014  2013 
Operating expenses      
General and administrative – Notes 8 and 9$2,236,580 $1,873,520 
Research and development 732,395  263,847 
       
Total operating expenses (2,968,975) (2,137,367)
       
Other income (expenses)      
Interest and finance expenses, net (7,089) (51,341)
Gain (loss) on settlement of accounts payable 199,655  (976,880)
Financing related charges and adjustments (8,624,986) (480,328)
Foreign exchange loss 33,042  (54,130)
       
Total other expenses, net (8,399,378) (1,562,679)
       
Net loss and comprehensive loss for the period$(11,368,353)$(3,700,046)
       
Loss per share      
   Basic$(0.29)$(0.12)
   Diluted$(0.30)$(0.12)
       
Weighted average number of shares outstanding      
   Basic 39,727,731  31,908,441 
   Diluted 39,727,731  31,908,441 

SEE ACCOMPANYING NOTES2015

F-3


       
  2017  2016  2015 
Operating expenses            
General and administrative $5,008,275  $8,334,740  $4,836,978 
Research and development  10,672,086   7,254,303   2,271,736 
             
Total operating expenses  (15,680,361)  (15,589,043)  (7,108,714)
             
Other income (expenses)            
Grant income  140,942   141,195    
Research and development incentive income  2,022,902   571,093    
Interest income (expense) , net  88,098   11,322   (71,825)
Gain on settlement of accounts payable  75,204   151,402    
Gain on settlement of debt     61,205    
Financing related charges and adjustments     (5,812)  (4,998,145)
Foreign exchange gain (loss)  (47,583)  (48,445)  70,554 
             
Total other income (expense), net  2,279,563   881,960   (4,999,416)
Net loss before provision for income taxes  (13,400,798)  (14,707,083)  (12,108,130)
             
Income tax expense  59,607   29,615    
             
Net loss and comprehensive loss $(13,460,405) $(14,736,698) $(12,108,130)
             
Loss per share            
Basic and diluted $(0.33) $(0.42) $(0.65)
             
Weighted average number of shares outstanding            
Basic and diluted  40,841,033   35,153,426   18,584,820 

See Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements


ANAVEXLIFESCIENCESCORP.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
fortheyearsendedSeptember30,2014and2013

  2014  2013 
Cash Flows used in Operating Activities      
Net loss for the period$(11,368,353)$(3,700,046)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operations:      
   Amortization and depreciation 768  576 
   Accretion of debt discount 1,917,615   
   Stock–based compensation 637,925  1,002,500 
   Amortization of deferred financing charge 1,123,612  1,215 
   Change in fair value of derivative financial instruments (2,956,000) (15,000)
   (Gain) Loss on settlement of accounts payable (199,655) 976,880 
   Loss on extinguishment of debt 8,539,759  495,328 
   Unrealized foreign exchange (18,798) (4,937)
Changes in non–cash working capital balances related to operations:    
   Prepaid expenses (33,234)  
   Accounts payable and accrued liabilities (303,018) 465,911 
Net cash used in operating activities (2,659,379) (777,573)
       
Cash Flows used in Investing Activities      
Acquisition of equipment (3,015)  
Net cash used in investing activities (3,015)  
       
Cash Flows provided by Financing Activities      
Issuance of common shares, net of share issue costs 368,170  801,285 
Share subscriptions received   60,000 
Proceeds from the issuance of promissory notes   250,000 
Financing fees paid (788,712)  
Proceeds from the issuance of convertible debentures 10,000,000   
Net cash provided by financing activities 9,579,458  1,111,285 
       
Increase in cash during the period 6,917,064  333,712 
Cash, beginning of period 345,074  11,362 
Cash, end of period$7,262,138 $345,074 
       
Supplemental Cash Flow Information – Note 11      

SEE ACCOMPANYING NOTES

F-4


ANAVEXLIFESCIENCESCORP.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY (CAPITAL DEFICIT)
forFor the years ended September 30, 20142017, 2016 and 2013

  Common Stock       
        Additional  Common       
        Paid–in  Shares to be  Accumulated    
  Shares  ParValue  Capital  Issued  Deficit  Total 
                   
Balance, October 1, 2012 30,240,687 $30,241 $34,599,514 $ – $ (37,504,926)$(2,875,171)
Equity units issued for settlement of loans payable on July 5, 2013 4,208,910  4,209  2,563,011      2,567,220 
Capital stock issued for cash on July 5, 2013 – at $0.40 2,196,133  2,196  563,257      565,453 
Less: Share issue costs       (112,174)     (112,174)
Initial purchase shares issued under Purchase Agreement on July 5, 2013 – at $0.40 591,858  592  99,750      100,342 
Less: Share issue costs     (71,335)     (71,335)
Common stock to be issued for cash–at $0.50       60,000    60,000 
Stock–based compensation     1,002,500        1,002,500 
Net loss for the period         (3,700,046) (3,700,046)
Balance, September 30, 2013 37,237,588  37,238  38,644,523  60,000  (41,204,972) (2,463,211)
Equity units issued under Purchase Agreement 400,000  400  187,770      188,170 
Commitment shares issued under terms of Purchase Agreement 2,510  3  (3)      
Capital stock issued for cash–at$0.50 120,000  120  59,880  (60,000)     
Capital stock issued for cash–at$0.30 500,000  500  149,500  30,000     180,000 
Share issue costs, net of recovery     (2,452)     (2,452)
Issuance of detachable warrants     5,989,900      5,989,900 
Agent's warrants issued in connection with convertible debentures     334,900      334,900 
Beneficial conversion feature on convertible debentures issued     4,010,100      4,010,100 
Reclassification of derivative financial instruments upon modification of warrant terms     221,000      221,000 
Capital stock issued pursuant to debt conversions–at$0.30 6,378,426  6,378  1,907,149      1,913,527 
Capital stock issued pursuant to debt conversions–at$0.25 2,561,713  2,562  548,558      551,120 
Stock based compensation     27,925  610,000    637,925 
Net loss for the period         (11,368,353) (11,368,353)
Balance, September 30, 2014 47,200,237 $47,201 $52,078,750 $640,000 $(52,573,325)$192,626 

SEE ACCOMPANYING NOTES2015

F-5


       
  2017  2016  2015 
          
Cash Flows used in Operating Activities            
Net loss $(13,460,405) $(14,736,698) $(12,108,130)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operations:            
Amortization and depreciation     1,252   995 
Accretion of debt discount     5,830   4,515,987 
Stock-based compensation  4,135,570   5,062,267   1,633,979 
Non-cash financing related charges        29,000 
Change in fair value of derivative financial instruments        567,000 
Loss (gain) on extinguishment of debt     (61,205)  (84,842)
Gain on settlement of accounts payable  (75,204)  (151,402)   
Unrealized foreign exchange     3,065   (18,683)
Changes in non-cash working capital balances related to operations:            
Sales tax recoverable  54,435   (2,507)  (76,840)
Prepaid expenses and deposits  (155,804)  (79,279)  (67,692)
Deposits     (52,396)   
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities  554,709   775,332   1,310,606 
Deferred grant income  (70,532)  (1,082)  71,614 
Net cash used in operating activities  (9,017,231)  (9,236,823)  (4,227,006)
             
Cash Flows provided by Financing Activities            
Issuance of common shares, net of share issue costs  27,270,674   3,167,420   12,343,988 
Repayment of promissory notes     (34,759)  (88,144)
Net cash provided by financing activities  27,270,674   3,132,661   12,255,844 
             
Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents during the year  18,253,443   (6,104,162)  8,028,838 
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of year  9,186,814   15,290,976   7,262,138 
Cash and cash equivalents, end of year $27,440,257  $9,186,814  $15,290,976 

See Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements


ANAVEX LIFE SCIENCES CORP.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

For the years ended September 30, 2017, 2016 and 2015

  Common Stock       
        Additional  Common       
        Paid-in  Shares to be  Accumulated    
  Shares  Par Value  Capital  Issued  Deficit  Total 
                         
Balance, October 1, 2014  11,800,063  $11,800  $50,714,151  $640,000  $(51,173,325) $192,626 
Equity units issued under Purchase Agreement  1,825,000   1,825   8,125,440         8,127,265 
Commitment shares issued under terms of Purchase Agreement  27,144   27   (27)         
Capital stock issued pursuant to debt conversions - at $1.00  7,272,487   7,272   6,587,850   167,415      6,762,537 
Capital stock issued for cash - at $1.00  500,000   500   1,500         2,000 
Capital stock issued pursuant to subscriptions received - at $1.20  25,000   25   29,975   (30,000)       
Shares issued pursuant to the exercise of warrants - at $1.20  3,097,275   3,097   3,713,629         3,716,726 
Shares issued pursuant to the exercise of warrants - cashless  6,838,632   6,839   (6,839)         
Shares issued pursuant to favored nations provision  658,612   659   (659)         
Reclassification of derivative liability        4,482,000         4,482,000 
Stock based compensation        413,979   1,220,000      1,633,979 
Net loss              (12,108,130)  (12,108,130)
Balance, September 30, 2015  32,044,213  $32,044  $74,060,999  $1,997,415  $(63,281,455) $12,809,003 
Shares issued under purchase agreements                        
Purchase shares  740,523   741   3,041,619         3,042,360 
Commitment shares  187,616   188   (188)         
Capital stock issued pursuant to debt conversions - at $1.00  173,577   173   173,404   (167,415)     6,162 
Shares issued pursuant to the exercise of warrants  41,687   42   125,020         125,062 
Shares issued pursuant to the exercise of warrants - cashless  1,979,246   1,979   (1,979)         
Shares issued pursuant to employment agreement  1,000,000   1,000   2,439,000   (1,830,000)     610,000 
Shares issued for rounding in connection with 4:1 reverse split  1,437   2   (2)         
Stock option compensation        4,452,267         4,452,267 
Net loss              (14,736,698)  (14,736,698)
Balance, September 30, 2016  36,168,299  $36,169  $84,290,140  $  $(78,018,153) $6,308,156 

See Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements


ANAVEX LIFE SCIENCES CORP.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

For the years ended September 30, 2017, 2016 and 2015

  Common Stock       
        Additional  Common       
        Paid-in  Shares to be  Accumulated    
  Shares  Par Value  Capital  Issued  Deficit  Total 
                         
Balance, September 30, 2016  36,168,299  $36,169  $84,290,140  $  $(78,018,153) $6,308,156 
Shares issued under purchase agreement                        
  Purchase shares  7,060,976   7,061   27,263,613         27,270,674 
  Commitment shares  48,980   49   (49)         
Shares issued upon exercise of warrants - cashless  52,562   53   (53)          
Share based compensation        4,135,570         4,135,570 
Net loss              (13,460,405)  (13,460,405)
Balance, September 30, 2017  43,330,817  $43,332  $115,689,221  $  $(91,478,558) $24,253,995 

See Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements


Anavex Life Sciences Corp.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

September 30, 2014 and 2013
(Stated in US Dollars)
2017 – Page 1

Note 1

Business Description and Basis of Presentation

Business

Anavex Life Sciences Corp. (the “Company”) is a clinical stage biopharmaceutical company engaged in the development of drug candidates to treat Alzheimer’s disease, other central nervous system (CNS) diseases, and various types of cancer. The Company’s lead compounds ANAVEX 2-73 and ANAVEX PLUS, a combination of ANAVEX 2-73 with donepezil (Aricept), are being developed to treat Alzheimer’s disease and potentially other central nervous system (CNS) diseases.

In December 2014 a Phase 2a clinical trial was initiated for ANAVEX 2-73, which is being evaluated for the treatment of Alzheimer’s disease. The randomized trial is designed to assess the safety and exploratory efficacy of ANAVEX 2-73 alone as well as in combination with donepezil (ANAVEX PLUS) in patients with mild to moderate Alzheimer’s disease. ANAVEX 2-73 targets sigma-1 and muscarinic receptors, which have been shown in preclinical studies to reduce stress levels in the brain and to reverse the pathological hallmarks observed in Alzheimer’s disease. ANAVEX 2-73 showed no serious adverse events in a previously performed Phase 1 study. In pre-clinical studies, ANAVEX 2-73 demonstrated anti-amnesic and neuroprotective properties in various animal models including the transgenic mouse model Tg2576.

The Company intends to identify and initiate discussions with potential partners in the next 12 months. Further, the Company may acquire or develop new intellectual property and assign, license, or otherwise transfer our intellectual property to further its goals.

Basis of Presentation

These financial statements have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America and the instructions to Form 10-K.

Certain amounts for the prior periods have been reclassified to conform to the current period’s presentation. These reclassifications did not impact reported results or earnings per share.

F-6



Business

Anavex Life Sciences Corp.
Notes (the “Company”) is a clinical stage biopharmaceutical company engaged in the development of differentiated therapeutics for the treatment of neurodegenerative and neurodevelopmental diseases including drug candidates to treat Alzheimer’s disease, other central nervous system (CNS) diseases, pain and various types of cancer. The Company’s lead compound ANAVEX 2-73 is being developed to treat Alzheimer’s disease, Parkinson’s disease and potentially other CNS diseases, including rare diseases, such as Rett syndrome.

Basis of Presentation

These consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the Consolidated Financial Statements
September 30, 2014United States of America and 2013
(Stated in US Dollars)  – Page 2the instructions to Form 10-K.

Note 2Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

a)

Use of Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in accordance with United States generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses in the reporting period. The Company regularly evaluates estimates and assumptions related to deferred income tax asset valuations, asset impairment, conversion features embedded in convertible notes payable, derivative valuations, stock based compensation and loss contingencies. The Company bases its estimates and assumptions on current facts, historical experience and various other factors that it believes to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities and the accrual of costs and expenses that are not readily apparent from other sources. The actual results experienced by the Company may differ materially and adversely from the Company’s estimates. To the extent there are material differences between the estimates and the actual results, future results of operations will be affected.

The preparation of financial statements in accordance with United States generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses in the reporting period. The Company regularly evaluates estimates and assumptions related to deferred income tax asset valuations, asset impairment, conversion features embedded in convertible notes payable, derivative valuations, stock based compensation and loss contingencies. The Company bases its estimates and assumptions on current facts, historical experience and various other factors that it believes to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities and the accrual of costs and expenses that are not readily apparent from other sources. The actual results experienced by the Company may differ materially and adversely from the Company’s estimates. To the extent there are material differences between the estimates and the actual results, future results of operations will be affected.

b)

Principles of Consolidation

These consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Anavex Life Sciences Corp. and its wholly-owned subsidiaries, Anavex Life Sciences (France) SA, a company incorporated under the laws of France and Anavex Australia Pty Limited, a company incorporated under the laws of Australia. All inter-company transactions and balances have been eliminated.

c)

Equipment

Equipment is recorded at cost and is depreciated at 33% per annum on the straight-line basis.

d)

Impairment of Long-Lived Assets

The Company reviews the recoverability of its long-lived assets whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of such assets may not be recoverable. The estimated future cash flows are based upon, among other things, assumptions about future operating performance, and may differ from actual cash flows. Long-lived assets evaluated for impairment are grouped with other assets to the lowest level for which identifiable cash flows are largely independent of the cash flows of other groups of assets and liabilities. If the sum of the projected undiscounted cash flows (excluding interest) is less than the carrying value of the assets, the assets will be written down to the estimated fair value in the period in which the determination is made.

F-7

These consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Anavex Life Sciences Corp. and its wholly-owned subsidiaries, Anavex Australia Pty Limited, a company incorporated under the laws of Australia, Anavex Germany GmbH, a company incorporated under the laws of Germany, and Anavex Canada Ltd., a company incorporated under the laws of the Province of Ontario, Canada. All inter-company transactions and balances have been eliminated.



Anavex Life Sciences Corp.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

September 30, 2014 and 2013
(Stated in US Dollars)2017 – Page 32


Note 2Summary of Significant Accounting Policies(cont’d)(continued)

e)c)

Financial Instruments

Cash and equivalents

The Company considers only those investments which are highly liquid, readily convertible to cash and that mature within three months from the date of purchase to be cash equivalents.

The carrying value of the Company’s financial instruments, consisting of cash and accounts payable and accrued liabilities approximate their fair value due to the short- term maturity of such instruments. Based on borrowing rates currently available to the Company for similar terms and based on the short term duration of the debt instruments, the carrying value of the promissory notes payable approximate their fair value. Unless otherwise noted, it is management’s opinion that the Company is not exposed to significant interest, currency or credit risks arising from these financial instruments.

d)
f)

Foreign Currency Translation

The functional currency of the Company is the US dollar. Monetary items denominated in a foreign currency are translated into US dollars at exchange rates prevailing at the balance sheet date and non-monetary items are translated at exchange rates prevailing when the assets were acquired or obligations incurred. Foreign currency denominated expense items are translated at exchange rates prevailing at the transaction date. Unrealized gains or losses arising from the translations are credited or charged to income in the period in which they occur.

g)

Research and Development Expenses

Research and developments costs are expensed as incurred. These expenses are comprised of the costs of the Company’s proprietary research and development efforts, including salaries, facilities costs, overhead costs and other related expenses as well as costs incurred in connection with third-party collaboration efforts. Milestone payments made by the Company to third parties are expensed when the specific milestone has been achieved.

In addition, the Company incurs expenses in respect of the acquisition of intellectual property relating to patents and trademarks. The probability of success and length of time to develop commercial applications of the drugs subject to the acquired patents and trademarks is difficult to determine and numerous risks and uncertainties exist with respect to the timely completion of the development projects. There is no assurance the acquired patents and trademarks will ever be successfully commercialized. Due to these risks and uncertainties, the acquisition of patents and trademarks does not meet the definition of an asset and thus are expensed as incurred.

Incentive Income

F-8

The Company is eligible to obtain a research and development tax credit from the Australian Tax Authority (the “ATO”) for certain research and development activities undertaken in Australia. The tax incentive is available on the basis of specific criteria with which the Company must comply. Although the tax incentive is administered through the ATO, the Company has accounted for the tax incentive outside of the scope of ASC Topic 740, Income Taxes since the incentive is not linked to the Company’s income tax liability and can be realized regardless of whether the Company has generated taxable income in Australia. The Company recognizes as other income the amount received for qualified expenses in the period they are received.

e)Basic and Diluted Loss per Share

Basic loss per common share is computed by dividing net loss available to common stockholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted loss per common share is computed similar to basic loss per common share except that the denominator is increased to include the weighted average number of all potentially dilutive securities convertible into shares of common stock that were outstanding during the period.

As of September 30, 2017, loss per share excludes 6,711,339 (2016 – 6,008,309) potentially dilutive common shares related to outstanding options and warrants, as their effect was anti-dilutive.

f)Financial Instruments

The carrying value of the Company’s financial instruments, consisting of cash and equivalents and accounts payable and accrued liabilities approximate their fair value due to the short-term maturity of such instruments. Unless otherwise noted, it is management’s opinion that the Company is not exposed to significant interest, currency or credit risks arising from these financial instruments.



Anavex Life Sciences Corp.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

September 30, 2014 and 2013
(Stated in US Dollars)2017 – Page 4
3

Note 2Summary of Significant Accounting Policies(cont’d)(continued)

g)Foreign Currency Translation

The functional currency of the Company is the US dollar. Monetary items denominated in a foreign currency are translated into US dollars at exchange rates prevailing at the balance sheet date and non-monetary items are translated at exchange rates prevailing when the assets were acquired or obligations incurred. Foreign currency denominated expense items are translated at exchange rates prevailing at the transaction date. Unrealized gains or losses arising from the translations are credited or charged to income in the period in which they occur.

The Company has determined that the functional currency of Anavex Australia Pty Limited is the US dollar. The Company has determined that the functional currency of Anavex Germany GmbH is the US dollar. The functional currency of Anavex Canada Ltd. is the Canadian dollar.

h)

Income Taxes

The Company has adopted the provisions of FASB ASC 740 "Income Taxes" (“ASC 740”) which requires the assetResearch and liability method of accounting for income taxes. Under the asset and liability method, deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to temporary differences between the financial statements carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled.

The Company follows the provisions of ASC 740 regarding accounting for uncertainty in income taxes. The Company initially recognizes tax positions in the financial statements when it is more likely than not the position will be sustained upon examination by the tax authorities. Such tax positions are initially and subsequently measured as the largest amount of tax benefit that is greater than 50% likely of being realized upon ultimate settlement with the tax authority assuming full knowledge of the position and all relevant facts. Application requires numerous estimates based on available information. The Company considers many factors when evaluating and estimating our tax positions and tax benefits, and our recognized tax positions and tax benefits may not accurately anticipate actual outcomes. As additional information is obtained, there may be a need to periodically adjust the recognized tax positions and tax benefits. These periodic adjustments may have a material impact on the consolidated statements of operations.

i)

Basic and Diluted Loss per Share

The basic loss per common share is computed by dividing net loss available to common stockholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding. Diluted loss per common share is computed similar to basic loss per common share except that the denominator is increased to include the number of additional common shares that would have been outstanding if the potential common shares had been issued and if the additional common shares were dilutive. Additionally, the numerator is also adjusted for changes in fair value of the derivative financial instruments where it is presumed they will be share settled.

For the year ended September 30, 2014, loss per share excludes 107,869,808 (2013 – 12,224,479) potentially dilutive common shares related to outstanding options, warrants, and convertible debentures as their effect was anti-dilutive.

Development Expenses

F-9

Research and development costs are expensed as incurred. These expenses are comprised of the costs of the Company’s proprietary research and development efforts, including salaries, facilities costs, overhead costs and other related expenses, as well as costs incurred in connection with third-party collaboration efforts. Milestone payments made by the Company to third parties are expensed when the specific milestone has been achieved.

In addition, the Company incurs expenses in respect of the acquisition of intellectual property relating to patents and trademarks. The probability of success and length of time to develop commercial applications of the drugs subject to the acquired patents and trademarks is difficult to determine and numerous risks and uncertainties exist with respect to the timely completion of the development projects. There is no assurance the acquired patents and trademarks will ever be successfully commercialized. Due to these risks and uncertainties, the acquisition of patents and trademarks does not meet the definition of an asset and thus are expensed as incurred within general and administrative expenses.



Anavex Life Sciences Corp.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

September 30, 2014 and 2013
(Stated in US Dollars)2017 – Page 5
4

Note 2Summary of Significant Accounting Policies(cont’d)(continued)

i)Grant Income

Research and development incentive income is recognized when the research and development activities have been undertaken and the Company has completed its assessment of whether such activities meet the relevant qualifying criteria. The Company recognizes such income at the fair value of the grant when it is received, and all substantive conditions have been satisfied. Grants received from government and other agencies in advance of the specific research and development costs to which they relate are deferred and recognized in the consolidated statement of operations in the period they are earned and when the related research and development costs are incurred.

j)

Stock-based Compensation

Income Taxes

The Company has adopted the provisions of FASB ASC 740 “Income Taxes” (“ASC 740”) which requires the asset and liability method of accounting for income taxes. Under the asset and liability method, deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to temporary differences between the financial statements carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled.

The Company follows the provisions of ASC 740 regarding accounting for uncertainty in income taxes. The Company initially recognizes tax positions in the financial statements when it is more likely than not the position will be sustained upon examination by the tax authorities. Such tax positions are initially and subsequently measured as the largest amount of tax benefit that is greater than 50% likely of being realized upon ultimate settlement with the tax authority assuming full knowledge of the position and all relevant facts. Application requires numerous estimates based on available information. The Company considers many factors when evaluating and estimating its tax positions and tax benefits, and its recognized tax positions and tax benefits may not accurately anticipate actual outcomes. As additional information is obtained, there may be a need to periodically adjust the recognized tax positions and tax benefits. These periodic adjustments may have a material impact on the consolidated statements of operations.


Anavex Life Sciences Corp.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

September 30, 2017 – Page 5

The Company accounts for all stock-based payments and awards under the fair value method.

Note 2
Summary of Significant Accounting Policies – (continued)

Stock-based payments to non-employees are measured at the fair value of the consideration received, or the fair value of the equity instruments issued, or liabilities incurred, whichever is more reliably measurable. The fair value of stock-based payments to non-employees is periodically re-measured until the counterparty performance is complete, and any change therein is recognized over the vesting period of the award and in the same manner as if the Company had paid cash instead of paying with or using equity based instruments. Compensation costs for stock-based payments with graded vesting are recognized on a straight-line basis. The cost of the stock-based payments to non-employees that are fully vested and non-forfeitable at the grant date is measured and recognized at that date, unless there is a contractual term for services in which case such compensation would be amortized over the contractual term.

The Company accounts for the granting of share purchase options to employees using the fair value method whereby all awards to employees will be recorded at fair value on the date of the grant. The fair value of all share purchase options are expensed over their vesting period with a corresponding increase to additional paid-in capital.

The Company uses the Black-Scholes option valuation model to calculate the fair value of share purchase options at the date of the grant. Option pricing models require the input of highly subjective assumptions, including the expected price volatility. Changes in these assumptions can materially affect the fair value estimates.

k)Stock-based Compensation

The Company accounts for all stock-based payments and awards under the fair value method.

Stock-based payments to non-employees are measured at the fair value of the consideration received, or the fair value of the equity instruments issued, or liabilities incurred, whichever is more reliably measurable. The fair value of stock-based payments to non-employees is periodically re-measured until the counterparty performance is complete, and any change therein is recognized over the vesting period of the award and in the same manner as if the Company had paid cash instead of paying with or using equity based instruments. Compensation costs for stock-based payments with graded vesting are recognized on a straight-line basis. The cost of the stock-based payments to non-employees that are fully vested and non-forfeitable at the grant date is measured and recognized at that date, unless there is a contractual term for services in which case such compensation would be amortized over the contractual term.

The Company accounts for the granting of share purchase options to employees using the fair value method whereby all awards to employees will be recorded at fair value on the date of the grant. The fair value of all share purchase options are expensed over their vesting period with a corresponding increase to additional paid-in capital.

The Company uses the Black-Scholes option valuation model to calculate the fair value of share purchase options at the date of the grant. Option pricing models require the input of highly subjective assumptions, including the expected price volatility. Changes in these assumptions can materially affect the fair value estimates.

l)Fair Value Measurements

The fair value hierarchy under GAAP is based on three levels of inputs, of which the first two are considered observable and the last unobservable, that may be used to measure fair value which are the following:


The fair value hierarchy under GAAP is based on three levels of inputs, of which the first two are considered observable and the last unobservable, that may be used to measure fair value which are the following:

Level 1 -

- quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities;

Level 2 -

- observable inputs other than Level I,1, quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets, quoted prices for identical or similar assets and liabilities in markets that are not active, and model-derived prices whose inputs are observable or whose significant value drivers are observable; and


Anavex Life Sciences Corp.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

September 30, 2017 – Page 6

Level 3 -

- assets and liabilities whose significant value drivers are unobservable by little or no market activity and that are significant to the fair value of the assets or liabilities.

F-10



Anavex Life Sciences Corp.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

September 30, 2014 and 2013
(Stated in US Dollars)2017 – Page 67


Note 2Summary of Significant Accounting Policies(cont’d)(continued)

l)

Fair Value Measurements – (cont’d)

(continued)

The book value of cash and cash equivalents and accounts payable and accrued liabilities approximate their fair values due to the short term maturity of those instruments.

At September 30, 2017 and 2016, the Company did not have any Level 3 assets or liabilities.

The book value of cash and accounts payable and accrued liabilities approximate their fair values due to the short term maturity of those instruments. Based on borrowing rates currently available to the Company under similar terms, the book value of promissory notes payable approximates their fair values. The Company’s promissory notes payable are based on Level 2 inputs in the ASC 820 fair value hierarchy.

m)

At September 30, 2014, the Company’s Level 3 liabilities consisted of embedded conversion features that were required to be accounted for as liabilities pursuant to ASC 815 because the Company did not have sufficient authorized and unissued shares available to settle fully certain conversion features of such instruments.

At September 30, 2013, the Company’s Level 3 liabilities consisted of share purchase warrants that were required to be accounted for as liabilities pursuant to ASC 815 Derivatives and Hedging (“ASC 815”)because the terms of the warrants contained provisions that were not in compliance with the fixed for fixed criteria of that guidance.

The Company calculated the fair value at the inception of those instruments, at September 30, 2014 and 2013, and at the date of reclassification of the warrants into equity using the binomial option pricing model to determine the fair value. The following assumptions were used for the respective instruments:

Derivative Liabilities

The Company evaluates its financial instruments and other contracts to determine if those contracts or embedded components of those contracts qualify as derivatives to be separately accounted for in accordance with ASC 815. The result of this accounting treatment is that the fair value of the embedded derivative is marked- to-market at each balance sheet date and recorded as a liability and the change in fair value is recorded in the consolidated statements of operations as other income or expense. Upon conversion or exercise of a derivative instrument, the instrument is marked to fair value at the conversion date and then that fair value is reclassified to equity.

The classification of derivative instruments, including whether such instruments should be recorded as liabilities or as equity, is re-assessed at the end of each reporting period. Derivative instruments that become subject to reclassification are reclassified at the fair value of the instrument on the reclassification date. Derivative instrument liabilities will be classified in the balance sheet as current or non-current based on whether or not settlement of the derivative instrument is expected within 12 months of the balance sheet date.

From time to time, certain of the Company’s embedded conversion features on debt and outstanding warrants have been treated as derivative liabilities for accounting purposes under ASC 815 due to insufficient authorized shares to fully settle conversion features of the instruments if exercised. In this case, the Company utilized the latest inception date sequencing method to reclassify outstanding instruments as derivative instruments. These contracts were recognized at fair value with changes in fair value recognized in earnings until such time as the conditions giving rise to such derivative liability classification were settled.

These derivative instruments did not trade in an active securities market. The Company used a binomial option pricing model to value derivative liabilities. This model used Level 3 inputs in the fair value hierarchy established by ASC 820 Fair Value Measurement.

The Company did not have any derivative instruments outstanding as at September 30, 2017 and 2016.


  September 30,
EmbeddedconversionoptionAt Inception2014
Risk–free interest rate3.13%3.21%
Expected life of options (years)29.5829.48
Annualized volatility100.71%100.07%
Stock price$0.26$0.18
Dividend rate0.00%0.00%

  September 30,Reclassification
WarrantsAt Inception2013Date
Risk–free interest rate0.28%0.10%0.13%
Expected life of options (years)1.491.251.03
Annualized volatility81.57%77.51%107.62%
Stock price$0.61$0.65$0.25
Dividend rate0.00%0.00%0.00%

F-11


Anavex Life Sciences Corp.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

September 30, 2014 and 2013
(Stated in US Dollars)2017 – Page 78


Note 2Summary of Significant Accounting Policies(cont’d)

l)

Fair Value Measurements – (cont’d)

Certain assets and liabilities are measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis; that is, the instruments are not measured at fair value on an ongoing basis but are subject to fair value adjustments only in certain circumstances (for example, when there is evidence of impairment). There were no assets or liabilities measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis during the periods ended September 30, 2014 and 2013.

m)

Derivative Liabilities

The Company evaluates its financial instruments and other contracts to determine if those contracts or embedded components of those contracts qualify as derivatives to be separately accounted for in accordance with ASC 815. The result of this accounting treatment is that the fair value of the embedded derivative is marked- to-market at each balance sheet date and recorded as a liability and the change in fair value is recorded in the consolidated statements of operations as other income or expense. Upon conversion or exercise of a derivative instrument, the instrument is marked to fair value at the conversion date and then that fair value is reclassified to equity.

The classification of derivative instruments, including whether such instruments should be recorded as liabilities or as equity, is re-assessed at the end of each reporting period. Derivative instruments that become subject to reclassification are reclassified at the fair value of the instrument on the reclassification date. Derivative instrument liabilities will be classified in the balance sheet as current or non-current based on whether or not settlement of the derivative instrument is expected within 12 months of the balance sheet date.

Certain of the Company’s embedded conversion features on debt and outstanding warrants are treated as derivative liabilities for accounting purposes under ASC 815 due to insufficient authorized shares to fully settle conversion features of the instruments if exercised. In this case, the Company utilizes the latest inception date sequencing method to reclassify outstanding instruments as derivative instruments. These contracts are recognized at fair value with changes in fair value recognized in earnings until such time as the conditions giving rise to such derivative liability classification have been settled.

These derivative instruments do not trade in an active securities market. The Company uses the binomial option pricing model to value derivative liabilities. This model uses Level 3 inputs in the fair value hierarchy established by ASC 820 Fair Value Measurement.

(Continued)

F-12


Anavex Life Sciences Corp.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
September 30, 2014 and 2013
(Stated in US Dollars)  – Page 8


Note 2Summary of Significant Accounting Policies– (cont’d)

n)

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

Recently Adopted Accounting Pronouncements

In June 2014, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Updated No. 2014-10, "Development Stage Entities” (“ASU 2014-10”) which removes the definition of a development stage entity from the Master Glossary of the Accounting Standards Codification, thereby removing the financial reporting distinction between development stage entities and other reporting entities from U.S. GAAP. In addition, the update eliminates the requirements for development stage entities to (1) present inception-to-date information in the statements of income, cash flows, and shareholder equity, (2) label the financial statements as those of a development stage entity, (3) disclose a description of the development stage activities in which the entity is engaged, and (4) disclose in the first year in which the entity is no longer a development stage entity that in prior years it had been in the development stage.

During the year ended September 30, 2014, the Company has elected to early adopt ASU 2014-10. The adoption of this ASU allowed the Company to remove the inception to date information and all references to development stage.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements Not Yet Adopted

In June 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-12, Accounting for Share-Based Payments When the Terms of an Award Provide That a Performance Target Could Be Achieved after the Requisite Service Period ("ASU 2014-12"). ASU 2014-12 requires that a performance target that affects vesting, and that could be achieved after the requisite service period, be treated as a performance condition. As such, the performance target should not be reflected in estimating the grant date fair value of the award. This update further clarifies that compensation cost should be recognized in the period in which it becomes probable that the performance target will be achieved and should represent the compensation cost attributable to the period(s) for which the requisite service has already been rendered. The amendments in this ASU are effective for annual periods and interim periods within those annual periods beginning after December 15, 2015. The Company is currently evaluating the impact this guidance will have on its financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.

In August 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-15, Disclosure of Uncertainties about an Entity’s Ability to Continue as a Going Concern (“ASU 2014-15”). ASU 2014-15 will explicitly require management to assess an entity’s ability to continue as a going concern, and to provide related footnote disclosure in certain circumstances. The new standard will be effective for all entities in the first annual period ending after December 15, 2016. The Company is currently evaluating the impact this guidance will have on its financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.

F-13


Anavex Life Sciences Corp.
NotesRecently Adopted Accounting Pronouncements

In June 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-12, Accounting for Share-Based Payments When the Terms of an Award Provide That a Performance Target Could Be Achieved after the Requisite Service Period (“ASU 2014-12”). ASU 2014-12 requires that a performance target that affects vesting, and that could be achieved after the requisite service period, be treated as a performance condition. As such, the performance target should not be reflected in estimating the grant date fair value of the award. This update further clarifies that compensation cost should be recognized in the period in which it becomes probable that the performance target will be achieved and should represent the compensation cost attributable to the Consolidatedperiod(s) for which the requisite service has already been rendered. The Company adopted this standard on October 1, 2016. The adoption of this standard did not have any effect on its financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.

In August 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-15, Disclosure of Uncertainties about an Entity’s Ability to Continue as a Going Concern (“ASU 2014-15”). ASU 2014-15 explicitly requires management to assess an entity’s ability to continue as a going concern, and to provide related footnote disclosure in certain circumstances. The Company adopted this standard on October 1, 2016. The adoption of this standard did not have any effect on its financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.

In April 2015, the Financial Statements
September 30, 2014Accounting Standards Board (FASB), issued the Accounting Standards Update 2015-03, Interest - Imputation of Interest (Subtopic 835-30) - Simplifying the Presentation of Debt Issuance Costs, that requires debt issuance costs related to a recognized debt liability to be presented in the balance sheet as a direct deduction from the debt liability rather than as an asset. Upon adoption, an entity must apply the new guidance retrospectively to all prior periods presented in the financial statements. The Company adopted this standard on October 1, 2016. The adoption of this standard did not have any effect on its financial condition, results of operations and 2013
(Stated in US Dollars)  – Page 9cash flows.


Note 2Summary of Significant Accountin g Policies– (cont’d)

l)

Recent Accounting Pronouncements – (cont’d)

Recent Accounting Pronouncements Not Yet Adopted – (cont’d)

In May 2014, the FASB and the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) issued a converged standard on revenue recognition from contracts with customers, ASU 2014-09 (Topic 606 and IFRS 15). This standard will supersede nearly all existing revenue recognition guidance. ASU 2014-09 is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2016.2017. The adoption of this standard is not expected to have a material impact for any period presented and the Company will apply this standard to all future revenues.


Anavex Life Sciences Corp.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

September 30, 2017 – Page 9

Note 2Summary of Significant Accounting Policies – (Continued)

Recent Accounting Pronouncements Not Yet Adopted – (Continued)

In November 2015, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2015-17 “Income Taxes: Balance Sheet Classification of Deferred Taxes (“ASU 2015-17”). ASU 2015-17 eliminates the requirement to bifurcate deferred taxes between current and non-current on the balance sheet and requires that deferred tax liabilities and assets be classified as noncurrent on the balance sheet. ASU 2015-17 is effective for public entities in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2016, and for interim periods within those fiscal years. The amendments for ASU-2015-17 can be applied retrospectively or prospectively and early adoption is permitted. The adoption of this standard is not expected to have a material impact for any period presented.

In February 2016, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2016-02,Leases (“ASU 2016-02”). The guidance would require lessees to recognize most leases on their balance sheets as lease liabilities with corresponding right –of use assets. The guidance is effective for annual and interim reporting periods beginning on or after December 15, 2018. The Company is currently evaluating the impact this guidance will have on its financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.

In March 2016, the FASB issued ASC 2016-09, “Compensation – Stock Compensation (Topic 718) – Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting” (“ASU 2016-09”). These amendments are intended to simplify several aspects of the accounting for share-based payment transactions, including the income tax consequences, classification of awards as either equity or liabilities, and classification on the statement of cash flows. These amendments are effective for the Company on October 1, 2017. Early adoption is permitted. Entities have the option to apply the amendments on either a prospective basis or a modified retrospective basis. The adoption of this standard is not expected to have a material impact for any period presented.

In August 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-15, Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230), Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments (“ASU 2016-15”). ASU 2016-15 reduces the existing diversity in practice in financial reporting across all industries by clarifying certain existing principles in ASC 230, Statement of Cash Flows, (“ASC 230”) including providing additional guidance on how and what an entity should consider in determining the classification of certain cash flows. In addition, in November 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-18, Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230), Restricted Cash (“ASU 2016-18”). ASU 2016-18 clarifies certain existing principles in ASC 230, including providing additional guidance related to transfers between cash and restricted cash and how entities present, in their statement of cash flows, the cash receipts and cash payments that directly affect the restricted cash accounts. This amendment is effective for the Company beginning on October 1, 2018. Early adoption is permitted. The adoption of ASU 2016-15 and ASU 2016-18 will modify the Company’s current disclosures and reclassifications within the consolidated statement of cash flows but they are not expected to have a material effect on the Company’s consolidated financial statements


Anavex Life Sciences Corp.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

September 30, 2017 – Page 10

Note 2Summary of Significant Accounting Policies – (Continued)

Recent Accounting Pronouncements Not Yet Adopted – (Continued)

In May 2017, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2017-09, “Compensation–Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Scope of Modification Accounting,” clarifying when a change to the terms or conditions of a share-based payment award must be accounted for as a modification. The new guidance requires modification accounting if the fair value, vesting condition or the classification of the award is not the same immediately before and after a change to the terms and conditions of the award. The new guidance is effective for the Company on a prospective basis beginning on October 1, 2018, with early adoption permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the impact this guidance will have on its financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.

Other than noted above, the Company does not expect the adoption of recently issued accounting pronouncements to have a significant impact on ourits results of operations, financial position or cash flow.

Note 3EquipmentOther Income

Grant Income

On June 19, 2015, the Company was awarded grant funding in the amount of $286,455. The grant has been received in exchange for a commitment to provide research and development for preclinical validation of Sigma-1 receptor agonism as potential treatment for Parkinson’s disease.

The grant income was deferred and amortized to other income over the related commitment period as the related research and development expenditures were incurred. During the year ended September 30, 2017, the Company recognized $140,942 (2016: $141,195; 2015: $Nil) of this grant on its statement of operations within grant income.

Research and development tax incentive

During the year ended September 30, 2017, the Company received other income of $2,022,902 (2016: $571,093, 2015: $Nil) in respect of a research and development incentive program offered by the Australian government.


      September 30, 2014    
      Accumulated    
   Cost  Depreciation  Net 
           
 Computer equipment$3,015 $768 $2,247 

      September 30, 2013    
      Accumulated    
   Cost  Depreciation  Net 
           
 Computer equipment$5,631 $5,631 $ 

F-14


Anavex Life Sciences Corp.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

September 30, 2014 and 2013
(Stated in US Dollars)2017 – Page 1011


Note 4Promissory Notes PayableLincoln Park Purchase Agreement

   2014  2013 
 Promissory note dated December 31, 2012 with a principal balance of $89,618 (CDN $100,000) bearing interest at 12% per annum, due on September 30, 2014 89,618  100,000 
        
 Promissory note dated January 9, 2013 with a principal balance of $77,679 (CDN $86,677), bearing interest at 12% per annum, secured by all the present and future assets of the Company; due on demand 77,679  84,060 
        
 Promissory note dated January 9, 2013 with a principal balance of $24,768 (CDN $27,639), bearing interest at 12% per annum, secured by all the present and future assets of the Company; due on demand 24,768  26,803 
   192,065  210,863 
 Less: current portion (192,065) (210,863)
  $ $ 

On December 31, 2012, the Company issued a promissory note having a principal balance of $89,618 (CDN$100,000) with terms that included interest at 12% per annum and matured on June 30, 2013, in exchange for an accounts payable owing with respect to unpaid consulting fees. This note was not repaid on June 30, 2013 and the maturity date was extended to September 30, 2014. Subsequent to September 30, 2014, the Company repaid this note.

On January 9, 2013, the Company issued two (2) promissory notes (the “Secured Notes”);

a)

The Company issued a promissory note in the amount of $77,679 (CDN$86,677) to the former President, Secretary, Treasurer, CFO and director of the Company (the “President”) in exchange for unpaid consulting fees owing to the President. The note is bearing interest at 12% per annum and was due June 30, 2013.

b)

The Company issued a promissory note in the amount of $24,768 (CDN$27,639) to a former director of the Company (the “Director”) in exchange for unpaid consulting fees owing to the Director. The note is bearing interest at 12% per annum and was due June 30, 2013.

The Secured Notes are secured by a right to delay the transfer of any or all of the Company’s assets until the obligations of the Secured Notes are satisfied, including a restriction on the transfer of cash by the Company and a security interest over the intellectual property of the Company. The security interests of the Secured Notes is ranked senior to any and all security interests granted prior to the issuance of the notes and to all subsequent security interests granted, unless the holders agree in writing to other terms.

F-15


Anavex Life Sciences Corp.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
September 30, 2014 and 2013
(Stated in US Dollars)  – Page 11


Note 4

Promissory Notes Payable– (cont’d)

In addition, the Secured Notes contain a provision whereby if they are not repaid within 10 days of their maturity dates, they shall bear late fees in addition to interest accruing, at a rate of $100 per day per note. In an event of default by the Company, under the terms of the Secured Notes, the notes shall bear additional late fees of $500 per day per note.

Subsequent to the issuance of these Secured Notes, the former President resigned as President, Secretary, Treasurer, CFO and director of the Company and the former Director resigned as director of the Company.

The Company did not repay the notes on June 30, 2013. The Company has disputed the issuance and enforceability of the Secured Notes and should there be an attempt to enforce the Secured Notes or collection on them, the Company will consider a legal remedy. The Company has not accrued any late fees in connection with these Secured Notes as of September 30, 2014 or 2013, as the Company does not consider these amounts to be legally enforceable.

Extinguishment of promissory notes payable and accounts payable

During the year ended September 30, 2013, the Company issued equity units in settlement of certain of its promissory notes and trade accounts payable. Each unit consisted of one common share and common share purchase warrant entitling the holder to purchase an additional common share at $0.75 until July 5, 2018.

The promissory note and accounts payable settlements are summarized as follows:


Amount Settled  Units issued    
      Accrued        Loss on 
Date of Note  Principal  Interest  Number  FairValue  Settlement 
Promissory notes payable                
June 6, 2012  49,000  3,200  130,501  98,205  46,005 
June 26, 2012  250,000  15,233  663,082  498,972  233,739 
October 17, 2012  150,000  5,425  388,562  292,394  136,969 
November 14, 2012  50,000  1,501  128,753  96,887  45,386 
February 8, 2013  50,000  699  126,747  95,377  44,678 
   549,000  26,058  1,437,645  1,081,835  506,777 
                 
Accounts payable  1,108,506    2,771,265  2,085,386  976,880 
                 
  $1,657,506 $26,058  4,208,910 $3,167,221 $1,483,657 

F-16


Anavex Life Sciences Corp.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
September 30, 2014 and 2013
(Stated in US Dollars)  – Page 12


Note 4Promissory Notes Payable– (cont’d)

The fair value of each unit issued was determined to be $0.753 determined by aggregating (i) the fair value of $0.61 for the Company’s common shares based on their quoted market price on the date of settlement and (ii) the fair value of $0.143 for each warrant included in the Company’s units. The fair value of the Company’s warrants was determined using the Black Scholes option pricing model with the following assumptions:


Stock price$0.61
Exercise price$0.75
Expected volatility81.57%
Risk–free discountrate0.28%
Expected term1.49years
Expected dividend yield0.00%

The loss on settlement of debt was recorded on the statement of operations for the year ended September 30, 2013 and was reduced by an amount of $11,449 relating to the interest that accrued on the promissory notes that was forgiven upon settlement of the notes payable in exchange for shares.

As discussed in Note 5, the warrants issued were required to be accounted for as derivative liabilities pursuant to the guidance of ASC 815. Consequently, the Company allocated the proceeds from the issuance of the units first to the warrants, at their fair value of $600,000 with the remainder of $2,567,220 being allotted to equity. The fair value of the warrants of $600,000 was determined based on the binomial option pricing model using the following assumptions: risk-free interest rate 0.28%, expected life 1.49 years, expected volatility 81.57%, dividend yield 0.00% .

F-17


Anavex Life Sciences Corp.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
September 30, 2014 and 2013
(Stated in US Dollars)  – Page 13


Note 5Non-interest Bearing Liabilities
Non-interest bearing liabilities consists of the following:

  2014  2013 
Senior Convertible Debentures$263,727 $ 
Derivative Financial Instruments 5,456,000  904,000 
 $5,719,727 $904,000 

Senior Convertible Debentures

  2014  2013 
       
Senior Convertible Debentures, non–interest bearing, unsecured, due March 18, 2044 7,446,044   
Less: Debt Discount (7,182,317)  
Total carrying value 263,727   
Less: current portion    
Long term liability$263,727 $ 

On March 13, 2014,October 21, 2015, the Company entered into a Securities$50,000,000 purchase agreement (the “2015 Purchase Agreement (the “Purchase Agreement”) with certain purchasers (the “Purchasers”Lincoln Park Capital Fund, LLC (“Lincoln Park”), pursuant to which the Company issued senior convertible debenturesmay sell and issue to Lincoln Park, and Lincoln Park is obligated to purchase, up to $50,000,000 in the aggregate principal amountvalue of $10,000,000 (the “Debentures”).

In connection with the issuance of the Debentures, the Company issued an aggregate of 67,666,666 share purchase warrants as follows:

     Non–    
  Purchasers  purchasers  Total 
Series A Warrants 33,333,333  500,000  33,833,333 
Series B Warrants 33,333,333  500,000  33,833,333 
  66,666,666  1,000,000  67,666,666 

Each Series A warrant is exercisable into one common share of the Company at $0.30 per share until March 18, 2019.

Each Series B warrant is exercisable into one common share of the Company at $0.42 per share until March 18, 2019

The Debentures are unsecured, non-interest bearing and are due on March 18, 2044. The Debentures were convertible, in whole or in part, at the option of the holder into commonits shares of the Company at $0.30 per share (“the Conversion Price”). The Conversion Price of the debenture will be adjusted in the event of common stock dividend, split or consolidation. The Conversion Price was later amendedfrom time to $0.25 per share, as set forth below.

F-18


Anavex Life Sciences Corp.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
September 30, 2014 and 2013
(Stated in US Dollars)  – Page 14


Note 5

Non-interest Bearing Liabilities– (cont’d)

Senior Convertible Debentures– (cont’d)

Pursuant to the guidance of ASC 470-20 Debt with Conversion and Other Options, the Company allocated the proceeds from the issuance of the Debentures between the Debentures and the detachable Purchaser warrants using the relative fair value method. The fair value of the Purchaser warrants of $22,326,200 at issuance resulted in a debt discount at issuance of $5,989,900.

The Company recorded a beneficial conversion feature discount of $4,010,100 in respect of the Debentures issued, based on the intrinsic value of the conversion feature limited to a maximum of the total proceeds of the Debentures allocated to the Debentures.

The total debt discount at issuance of $10,000,000 was being amortized using the effective interest method over the term of the Debentures. During the year ended September 30, 2014, the Company recorded accretion expense of $1,914,433 (2013: $Nil) in respect of the accretion of this discount, which is included in other financing related charges and adjustments on the consolidated statement of operations.

In consideration for the Debentures issued, the Company issued an aggregate of 1,000,000 share purchase warrants to non-lenders as described above. The fair value of the Non-Purchaser Warrants of $334,900, along with finder’s fees and other financing costs directly associated with the issuance of the Debentures in the amount of $788,712, was recorded as a deferred financing charge and is being amortized to income over the term of the Debentures using the effective interest method. During the year ended September 30, 2014, the Company had recorded financing expense of $13,044 (2013: $Nil) in respect of the amortization of these charges.

The fair value of the Purchaser and Non-Purchaser warrants at issuance was determined using the Black Scholes option pricing model with the following weighted average assumptions:


Risk-free interest rate1.56%
Expected life (years)5.00
Expected volatility97.16%
Dividend yields0.00%

time over a 36-month period. In connection with the Purchase Agreement, the Company also entered into a registration rights agreement with each Purchaser (the “RRA”)Lincoln Park whereby the Company agreed to file a registration statementstatements with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) covering the resale of the shares of the Company’s common stock issuable upon conversionthat may be issued to Lincoln Park under the Purchase Agreement.

The Company may direct Lincoln Park, at its sole discretion, and subject to certain conditions, to purchase up to 50,000 shares of common stock on any business day, provided that at least one business day has passed since the Debentures and upon exercisemost recent purchase. The amount of the Purchaser warrants.

On July 23, 2014, the registration statement was declared effective by the SEC.

F-19


Anavex Life Sciences Corp.
Notesa purchase may be increased under certain circumstances provided, however that Lincoln Park’s committed obligation under any single purchase shall not exceed $2,000,000. The purchase price of shares of common stock related to the Consolidated Financial Statements
September 30, 2014 and 2013
(Stated in US Dollars)  – Page 15


Note 5Non-interest Bearing Liabilities– (cont’d)
Senior Convertible Debentures– (cont’d)
Amendment Agreements

On August 25, 2014, the Company entered into amendment agreements with each Purchaser, pursuant to which all provisions regarding liquidating damages and the accrual of damages with respect to the obligations for, and rights enforceable against, the Company, were eliminated from the RRAs. As consideration for entering into the amendment agreements and for the Purchasers agreeing to forego an amount of $459,912 in liquidating damages that had accrued and were accruing pursuant to the terms of the original RRAs, the Company agreed to adjust the fixed conversion price of the remaining outstanding debentures from $0.30 per share to $0.25 per share (the “Debenture Amendment”).

The Company assessed the guidance under ASC 470-60Troubled Debt Restructurings and determined that this guidance did not apply to the Debenture Amendment. The Debenture Amendment was considered a substantial change in the terms of the debentures pursuant to ASC 470-50Modifications and Extinguishmentsand accordingly, the Company was required to apply debt extinguishment accounting. Consequently, the Company calculated a net non-cash loss on extinguishment of debt of $8,099,137 as the premium of the aggregate fair value of the amended debentures over their aggregate carrying values of $906 immediately prior to the Debenture Amendment and the gain from the forgiveness of accrued liquidating damages of $459,912. This amount is included in other financing related charges and adjustments on the consolidated statement of operations for the year ended September 30, 2014.

The Company calculated the fair value of the amended Debentures by discounting future cash flows using rates representative of current borrowing rates for debt instruments without a conversion feature and by using the binomial option pricing model to determine the fair value of the conversion features, using the following assumptions:


Risk-free interest rate3.13%
Expected life (years)29.58
Expected volatility100.71%
Dividend yields0.00%

The net loss was recordedfuture funding will be based on the then prevailing market prices of such shares at the time of sales as part of financing related charges and adjustmentsdescribed in the consolidated statement of operations during the year ended September 30, 2014. 2015 Purchase Agreement.

In addition, in accordance with debt extinguishment accounting, remaining unamortized financing costs of $1,110,568 associated with the original Debentures were immediately amortized through earnings uponconsideration for entering into the amendments. This amount is also included in other financing related charges2015 Purchase Agreement, the Company issued to Lincoln Park 179,598 shares of common stock as a commitment fee and adjustments in the consolidated statement of operations for the year ended September 30, 2014.

F-20


Anavex Life Sciences Corp.
Notesagreed to the Consolidated Financial Statements
September 30, 2014issue up to 89,799 shares pro rata, when and 2013
(Stated in US Dollars)  – Page 16


Note 5Non-interest Bearing Liabilities– (cont’d)
Senior Convertible Debentures– (cont’d)

During the year ended September 30, 2014, the Company issued an aggregate of 8,940,139 shares of common stock pursuant to conversion notices received from the Purchasers as follows:


(a)

An aggregate of 6,378,426 shares of common stock were issued at a conversion price of $0.30 per share pursuant to the conversion of $1,913,527 in outstanding principal amounts due under the Debentures, prior to the Debenture Amendment.

(b)

An aggregate of 2,561,713 shares of common stock were issued at a conversion price of $0.25 per share pursuant to the conversion of $640,428 in outstanding principal amounts due under the Debentures, subsequent to the Debenture Amendments.

As a result of the bifurcation of the embedded conversion option subsequent to the Debenture Amendments as discussed above, for accounting purposes, two instruments are considered outstanding and, upon exercise of the contractual conversion option, extinguishment accounting has been applied. Consequently, the embedded conversion feature is marked to fair valueif, Lincoln Park purchases at the conversion date andCompany’s discretion the shares issued pursuant to conversion are recorded at their fair value on the date of issuance, determined with reference to the quoted market price of the Company’s shares on the issuance date. The resulting difference is recorded as a gain or loss on the consolidated statement of operations. $50,000,000 aggregate commitment.

During the year ended September 30, 2014,2017, the Company recorded $19,290 (2013:issued to Lincoln Park an aggregate of 7,109,956 (2016: 452,437; 2015: Nil) shares of common stock under the Purchase Agreement, including 7,060,976 (2016: 450,000; 2015: Nil) shares of common stock for an aggregate purchase price of $27,270,674 (2016: $1,357,800; 2015: $Nil) and 48,980 (2016: 2,437; 2015: Nil) commitment shares. At September 30, 2017, an amount of $21,371,526 remained available under the 2015 Purchase Agreement.

Note 5Related Party Transactions

As at September 30, 2017, included in respect of net gains on these conversionaccounts payable and accrued liabilities was $34,144 (2016: $59,264) owing to directors and officers of the Debentures.

Embedded conversion optionsCompany for director fees and warrants

The following table presents the componentsreimbursable expenses, and a former director and officer of the Company’s embedded conversion options and warrants being accountedCompany for as derivative liabilities. These instruments have no observable market data and are derived using an option pricing model measured at fair value on a recurring basis, using Level 3 inputs to the fair value hierarchy:

   September 30, 
   2014  2013 
        
 Warrants$ $904,000 
 Embedded conversion features 5,456,000   
 Derivative financial instruments$5,456,000 $904,000 

These derivative financial instruments arise as a result of applying ASC 815Derivatives and Hedging (“ASC 815”), which requires the Company to make a determination whether an equity-linked financial instrument, or embedded feature, is indexed to the entity’s own stock. This guidance applies to any freestanding financial instrument or embedded features that have the characteristics of a derivative, and to any freestanding financial instruments that are potentially settled in an entity’s own stock.unpaid fees.

F-21



Anavex Life Sciences Corp.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

September 30, 2014 and 2013
(Stated in US Dollars)2017 – Page 1712 


Note 5Non-interest Bearing Liabilities– (cont’d)
Embedded conversion options and warrants– (cont’d)

During the year ended September 30, 2014, the Company issued debentures with fixed price embedded conversion features and, subsequent to certain amendments as discussed above, the Company did not have a sufficient number of authorized and available shares of common stock to fully settle the conversion feature of such instruments if exercised. As such, the Company was required to account for these instruments as derivative financial instruments. On the commitment date of the related convertible debentures, the Company recorded a debt discount to the extent of the fair value of the embedded conversion features required to be accounted for as liabilities under ASC 815.

Note 6
Commitments

During the year ended September 30, 2013, the Company issued an aggregate of 6,448,966 common stock purchase warrants that were required to be accounted for as liabilities pursuant to ASC 815 as a result of certain features embedded in those instruments. During the year ended September 30, 2014, the Company amended the terms of these common stock purchase warrants. As of the modification date, these warrants were no longer required to be accounted for as liabilities. Pursuant to the guidance of ASC 815, the Company reclassified the fair value of these instruments on the date of modification into equity, with the change in fair value up to the date of modification being recorded on the consolidated statements of operations as other income.

a)
Lease Commitment

The Company is committed to lease payments as follows:

Fiscal year ending September 30,  
2018  $115,189 
2019   57,594 
   $172,783 

As a result of the application of ASC 815, the Company has recorded these liabilities at their fair values as follows:

b)
Litigation

   September 30, 
   2014  2013 
        
 Balance, beginning of the period$904,000 $ 
 Fair value at issuance 8,277,000  919,000 
 Change in fair value during the period (2,956,000) (15,000)
 Transfer to equity upon modification of warrant terms (221,000)  
 Transfer to equity upon exercise (548,000)  
 Balance, end of the period$5,456,000 $904,000 

The embedded conversion featuresCompany is subject to claims and warrants accounted for as derivative financial instruments havelegal proceedings that arise in the ordinary course of business. Such matters are inherently uncertain, and there can be no observable market andguarantee that the outcome of any such matter will be decided favorably to the Company estimated their fair values ator that the resolution of any such matter will not have a material adverse effect upon the Company’s consolidated financial statements. The Company does not believe that any of such pending claims and legal proceedings will have a material adverse effect on its consolidated financial statements.

c)Share Purchase Warrants

A summary of the status of the Company’s outstanding share purchase warrants is presented below:

  Number of Shares Weighted Average Exercise Price
Balance, October 1, 2015   4,272,890  $2.11 
Exercised   (2,463,581) $1.67 
Balance, September 30, 2016   1,809,309  $2.70 
Exercised   (200,000) $3.00 
Balance,September 30, 2017   1,609,309  $2.66 

At September 30, 2014 and 2013 using2017, the binomial option pricing model based on the followingCompany had share purchase warrants outstanding of 1,609,309, with a weighted average management assumptions:exercise price of $2.66 as follows:

Number Exercise Price Expiry Date
 1,262,180  $3.00  July 5, 2018
 30,000  $4.00  February 24, 2019
 277,127  $1.20  March 13, 2019
 1,252  $1.68  March 13, 2019
 31,250  $1.24  May 31, 2019
 7,500  $1.04  May 31, 2019
 1,609,309       

 20142013
Risk-free interest rate3.21%0.10%
Expected life (years)29.481.25
Expected volatility100.07%77.51%
Stock price$0.184$0.65
Dividend yields0.00%0.00%

F-22


Anavex Life Sciences Corp.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

September 30, 2014 and 2013
(Stated in US Dollars)2017 – Page 1813 


Note 6Capital StockCommitments– (Continued)

As at September 30, 2014, the Company’s authorized share capital, consisting of 150,000,000 share of common stock, was insufficient to fully settle the conversion or exercise of all outstanding convertible debentures, stock purchase warrants and stock options at that date. As a result, and in accordance with ASC 815, the Company has recorded derivative liabilities in connection with certain embedded conversion options contained in convertible debentures outstanding at September 30, 2014, as more fully described in Note 5.

c)

Year ended September 30, 2014

On February 24, 2014, the Company issued 120,000 units at $0.50 per unit for gross proceeds of $60,000, which was received during the year ended September 30, 2013. Each unit consisted of one common share and one common share purchase warrant entitling the holder to purchase additional common shares at $1.00 per share for a period of five years from the date of issuance.

On February 24, 2014, the Company issued 500,000 units at $0.30 per unit for gross proceeds of $150,000. Each unit consisted of one common share and one common share purchase warrant entitling the holder to purchase additional common shares at $0.75 per share for a period of five years from the date of issuance.

Year ended September 30, 2013

On July 5, 2013, the Company issued 4,208,910 units in settlement of $549,000 in promissory notes, $26,058 of accrued interest on these notes, which was included in accounts payable and accrued liabilities, and $1,108,506 in other accounts payable and accrued liabilities. Each unit consisted of one common share and one common share purchase warrant entitling the holder to purchase an additional common share at $0.75 per share until July 5, 2018. (Note 4).

On July 5, 2013, the Company issued 2,196,133 units at $0.40 per unit for gross proceeds of $878,453 pursuant to private placement agreements. Each unit consisted of one common share and one common share purchase warrant entitling the holder to purchase an additional common share at $0.75 per share until July 5, 2018. As discussed in Note 5, the warrants issued were required to be accounted for as derivative liabilities pursuant to the guidance of ASC 815. Consequently, the Company allocated the proceeds from the issuance of the units first to the warrants, at their fair value of $313,000 with the remainder of $565,453 being allotted to equity. The fair value of the warrants of $313,000 was determined based on the binomial option pricing model using the following assumptions: risk-free interest rate 0.28%, expected life 1.49 years, expected volatility 81.57%, dividend yield 0.00%.

In addition, the Company paid finder’s fees of $95,680 in connection with the issuance of the units, consisting of cash of $89,680 and $6,000 in warrants to purchase 43,923 shares of common stock at $0.75 per share until July 5, 2018 in connection with this private placement. The fair value of the warrants of $6,000 was determined using the binomial option pricing model using the following assumptions: risk-free interest rate 0.28%, expected life 1.49 years, expected volatility 81.57%, dividend yield 0.00%. In addition, the Company incurred share issuance costs of $16,494.

F-23


Anavex Life Sciences Corp.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
September 30, 2014 and 2013
(Stated in US Dollars)  – Page 19


Note 6Capital Stock– (cont’d)
Common stock to be issued

On February 28, 2014, the Company received $30,000 in share subscriptions in respect of the issuance of 100,000 units at $0.30 per unit. Each unit consisted of one common share and one common share purchase warrant entitling the holder to purchase additional common shares at $0.75 per share for a period of five years from the date of issuance.

Note 7

Lincoln Park Purchase Agreement

On July 5, 2013, the Company entered into a $10,000,000 purchase agreement (the “Purchase Agreement”) with Lincoln Park Capital Fund, LLC, (“Lincoln Park”) an Illinois limited liability company (the “Financing”) pursuant to which the Company may sell and issue to Lincoln Park, and Lincoln Park is obligated to purchase, up to $10,000,000 in value of its shares of common stock from time to time over a 25 month period. In connection with the Financing, the Company also entered into a registration rights agreement with Lincoln Park whereby the Company agreed to file a registration statement with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) covering the shares of the Company’s common stock that may be issued to Lincoln Park under the Purchase Agreement.

The Company will determine, at its own discretion, the timing and amount of its sales of common stock, subject to certain conditions and limitations. The purchase price of the shares that may be sold to Lincoln Park under the Purchase Agreement will be based on the market price of the Company’s shares of common stock immediately preceding the time of sale without any fixed discount, provided that in no event will such shares be sold to Lincoln Park when the closing sale price is less than $0.50 per share. There are no upper limits on the per share price that Lincoln Park may pay to purchase such common stock. The purchase price will be equitably adjusted for any reorganization, recapitalization, non-cash dividend, stock split or similar transaction occurring during the business days used to compute such price.

Pursuant to the Purchase Agreement, Lincoln Park initially purchased 250,000 shares of the Company’s common stock for $100,000. In consideration for entering into the Purchase Agreement, the Company issued to Lincoln Park 341,858 shares of common stock as a commitment fee and shall issue up to 133,409 shares pro rata, when and if, Lincoln Park purchases, at the Company’s discretion, the remaining $10,000,000 aggregate commitment. The Purchase Agreement may be terminated by the Company at any time at its discretion without any cost to the Company.

On October 23, 2013, the registration statement was declared effective by the SEC.

F-24


Anavex Life Sciences Corp.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
September 30, 2014 and 2013
(Stated in US Dollars)  – Page 20


Note 7Lincoln Park Purchase Agreement– (cont’d)

The Company incurred a net $73,787 in direct expenses in connection with the Purchase Agreement and registration statement, of which $71,335 was incurred during the year ended September 30, 2013. These were recorded as share issuance costs as a charge against additional paid in capital during the year ended September 30, 2014 and during the nine months ended June 30, 2014.

During the year ended September 30, 2014, the Company issued to Lincoln Park an aggregate of 402,510 shares of common stock under the Purchase Agreement, including 400,000 shares of common stock for an aggregate purchase price of $188,170 and 2,510 commitment shares.

Note 8

Related Party Transactions

During the year ended September 30, 2014, the Company was charged general and administrative expenses totaling $1,041,140 in respect of directors fees, management bonuses and share and stock option based compensation charges paid or accrued to directors and officers of the Company, inclusive of amounts noted below (2013: $81,072 in respect of consulting fees paid to directors, officers, and a company controlled by a director and officer of the Company).

As at September 30, 2014, included in accounts payable and accrued liabilities was $28,232 (2013: $30,447) owing to directors and officers of the Company for director fees and reimbursable expenses, and a former director and officer of the Company for unpaid fees.

During the year ended September 30, 2013, pursuant to an employment agreement with the President, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, Secretary and Treasurer, and Director, of the Company, the Company:


i)

granted 2,000,000 fully vested share purchase options exercisable at $0.40 per share until July 5, 2023. The Company recognized stock based compensation expense of $1,002,500 during the year ended September 30, 2013 in connection with these options.

ii)

issued 4,000,000 shares of restricted common stock that vest as follows:


25% upon the Company starting a Phase Ib/IIb human study

25% upon the Company in-licensing additional assets in clinical or pre- clinical stage (vested during the year ended September 30, 2014)

25% upon the Company securing additional non-dilutive equity funding in 2013 of at least $5,000,000 with a share price higher than the previous funding

25% upon the Company obtaining a listing on a major stock exchange

Included in operating results for the year ended September 30, 2014 is an amount of $610,000 relating to the vesting of 1,000,000 shares of restricted common stock upon the achievement of certain performance conditions. The fair value of $0.61 per share was determined with reference to the quoted market price of the Company’s shares on the commitment date. This amount has been included in common stock to be issued at September 30, 2014.

F-25


Anavex Life Sciences Corp.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
September 30, 2014 and 2013
(Stated in US Dollars)  – Page 21


Note 9Commitments

a)

Share Purchase Warrants

A summary of the Company’s share purchase warrants outstanding is presented below:

– (Continued)

     Weighted 
     Average 
     Exercise 
  Number of Shares  Price 
       
Balance, October 1, 2012 4,250,141 $1.16 
Expired (1,549,628)$2.56 
Issued 6,448,966 $0.75 
Balance, September 30, 2013 9,149,479 $0.75 
Expired (2,700,513)$0.75 
Issued 68,466,666 $0.36 
Balance, September 30, 2014 74,915,632 $0.40 

At September 30, 2014, the Company has 74,915,632 currently exercisable share purchase warrants outstanding as follows:

Number  Exercise Price  Expiry Date 
6,448,966 $0.75  July 5, 2018 
500,000 $0.75  February 14, 2019 
120,000 $1.00  February 24, 2019 
33,833,333 $0.30  March 13, 2019 
33,833,333 $0.42  March 13, 2019 
180,000 $0.31  May 31, 2019 
74,915,632       

All of the 6,448,966 warrants expiring on July 5, 2018 and the 500,000 warrants expiring February 14, 2019 contain a contingent call provision whereby the Company may have the option to call for cancellation of all or any portion of the warrants for consideration equal to $0.001 per share, provided the quoted market price of the Company’s common stock exceeds $1.50$6.00 for a period of twenty consecutive trading days, subject to certain minimum volume restrictions and other restrictions as provided in the warrant agreements.

F-26

During the year ended September 30, 2017, 200,000 share purchase warrants were cashless exercised, resulting in the issuance of 52,562 shares of common stock.

During the year ended September 30, 2016, the Company issued 1,979,246 shares of common stock pursuant to the exercise of 2,421,894 share purchase warrants on a cashless basis, and 41,687 shares of common stock pursuant to the exercise of warrants for cash.

d)Stock–based Compensation Plan

2015 Stock Option Plan

On September 18, 2015, the Company’s board of directors approved a 2015 Omnibus Incentive Plan (the “2015 Plan”), which provides for the grant of stock options and restricted stock awards to directors, officers, employees and consultants of the Company.

The maximum number of our common shares reserved for issue under the plan is 6,050,553 shares subject to adjustment in the event of a change of the Company’s capitalization. As a result of the adoption of the 2015 Plan, no further option awards will be granted under any previously existing stock option plan. Stock option awards previously granted under previously existing stock option plans remain outstanding in accordance with their terms.

The 2015 Plan is administered by the board of directors, except that it may, in its discretion, delegate such responsibility to a committee of such board. The exercise price will be determined by the board of directors at the time of grant shall be at least equal to the fair market value on such date. If the grantee is a 10% stockholder on the grant date, then the exercise price shall not be less than 110% of fair market value of the Company’s shares of common stock on the grant date. Stock options may be granted under the 2015 Plan for an exercise period of up to ten years from the date of grant of the option or such lesser periods as may be determined by the board, subject to earlier termination in accordance with the terms of the 2015 Plan.



Anavex Life Sciences Corp.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

September 30, 2014 and 2013
(Stated in US Dollars)2017 – Page 2214 


Note 96Commitments(cont’d)(Continued)

b)d)

Stock–basedStock-based Compensation Plan

In April, 2007, the Company adopted a stock option plan which provides for the granting of stock options to selected directors, officers, employees or consultants in an aggregate amount of up to 3,000,000 common shares of the Company and, in any case, the number of shares to be issued to any one individual pursuant to the exercise of options shall not exceed 10% of the issued and outstanding share capital. The granting of stock options, exercise prices and terms are determined by the Company's Board of Directors. If no vesting schedule is specified by the Board of Directors on the grant of options, then the options shall vest over a 4-year period with 25% of the granted options vesting each year commencing 1 year from the grant date. For stockholders who have greater than 10% of the outstanding common shares of the Company and who have granted options, the exercise price of their options shall not be less than 110% of the fair of the stock on grant date. Otherwise, options granted shall have an exercise price equal to their fair value on grant date.

On February 2, 2011, the Company amended and restated the 2007 stock option plan to increase the number of options authorized to 4,000,000.

A summary of the status of Company’s outstanding stock purchase options for the years ended September 30, 2014 and 2013 is presented below:

– (Continued)

A summary of the status of Company’s outstanding stock purchase options is presented below:

   Number of
Shares
  Weighted
Average
Exercise Price
  Weighted
Average
Grant Date
Fair Value
 
Outstanding at October 1, 2015   1,822,500  $2.00     
Granted   2,401,500   5.22  $4.38 
Expired   (25,000)  14.68     
Outstanding at September 30, 2016   4,199,000   3.76     
Granted   1,107,500   5.51  $5.44 
Forfeited   (214,470)  4.06     
Outstanding at September 30, 2017   5,092,030  $4.13     
Exercisable at September 30, 2017   3,326,223  $3.10     
Exercisable at September 30, 2016   2,290,716  $2.42     


      Weighted  Weighted 
   Number of  Average  Average Grant 
   Shares  Exercise Price  Date fair value 
 Outstanding at October 1, 2012 1,775,000 $2.94    
 Expired (550,000)$3.86    
 Forfeited (150,000)$3.72    
 Granted 2,000,000 $0.40 $0.50 
 Outstanding at September 30, 2013 3,075,000 $1.26    
 Expired (705,000)$2.70    
 Granted 800,000 $0.32 $0.25 
 Outstanding at September 30, 2014 3,170,000 $0.70    
 Exercisable at September 30, 2014 2,100,000 $0.56    
 Exercisable at September 30, 2013 2,305,000 $0.79    

F-27


Anavex Life Sciences Corp.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

September 30, 2014 and 2013
(Stated in US Dollars)2017 – Page 2315


Note 96Commitments(cont’d)(Continued)

b)d)

Stock–basedStock-based Compensation Plan – (cont’d)

At September 30, 2014, the following stock options were outstanding:

(Continued)

Number of Shares        Aggregate  Remaining 
     Number  Exercise     Intrinsic  Contractual 
Total    Vested  Price  ExpiryDate  Value  Life (yrs) 
     100,000 (1) 100,000 $3.67  March 30, 2016    1.50 
     270,000 (2)  $3.00  February 8, 2017    2.36 
2,000,000 (3)  2,000,000 $0.40  July 5 ,2023    8.77 
     300,000 (4)  $0.30  May 7, 2024    9.61 
     500,000 (5)  $0.33  May 8, 2024    9.61 
3,170,000    2,100,000            

At September 30, 2017, the following stock options were outstanding:

Number of Shares       Aggregate  Remaining 
   Number  Exercise    Intrinsic  Contractual 
Total  Vested  Price  Expiry Date Value  Life (yrs) 
500,000   500,000  $1.60  July 5, 2023 $1,270,000   5.76 
75,000   75,000  $1.20  May 7, 2024  220,500   6.60 
125,000   93,750  $1.32  May 8, 2024  352,500   6.60 
718,750   718,750  $0.92  April 2, 2025  2,314,375   7.50 
29,167   29,167  $1.44  June 8, 2025  78,751   7.69 
50,000   33,333  $1.76  June 15, 2025  119,000   7.71 
266,250   199,688  $5.04  September 18, 2025     7.97 
1,500   1,500  $5.64  September 30, 2025     8.00 
31,250   20,833  $5.68  October 2, 2025     8.01 
25,000   16,666  $8.98  October 16, 2025     8.04 
1,500   1,500  $5.57  December 31, 2025     8.25 
1,500   1,500  $4.90  March 31, 2026     8.50 
1,500   1,500  $5.66  April 27, 2026     8.57 
19,697   19,697  $4.09  May 18, 2026  985   8.63 
1,500   1,500  $6.11  June 30, 2026     8.75 
379,625   126,542  $6.26  July 5, 2026     8.76 
861,429   287,143  $7.06  July 18, 2026     8.80 
13,333   13,333  $3.06  September 7, 2026  14,400   8.94 
1,006,696   1,006,696  $3.28  September 22, 2026  865,759   8.98 
69,166   29,164  $3.63  October 3, 2026  35,275   9.01 
15,000   5,000  $4.35  December 9, 2026     9.19 
50,000     $5.39  February 7, 2027     9.36 
40,000   10,000  $5.26  February 17, 2027     9.38 
781,667   131,669  $5.92  May 12, 2027     9.61 
12,500   1,042  $3.42  August 9, 2027  9,000   9.86 
15,000   1,250  $4.33  September 19, 2027     9.97 
5,092,030   3,326,223        $5,280,544     

The aggregate intrinsic value is calculated as the difference between the exercise price of the underlying awards and the quoted market price of the Company’s stock for the options that were in-the-money at September 30, 2014.2017.

(1)

As of September 30, 2014 and September 30, 2013, these options had fully vested. These options were granted during the year ended September 30, 2011 and vested over a period of one year from the date of grant. The fair value of these options at issuance was calculated to be $267,000. The Company did not recognize any stock-based compensation during the year ended September 30, 2014 (2013: $Nil).


(2)

As of September 30, 2014 and 2013, none of these options had vested. The options vest upon one or more compounds: entering Phase II trial – 90,000 options; entering Phase III trial – 90,000 options; and receiving FDA approval – 90,000 options. No stock-based compensation has been recorded in the financial statements as none of the performance conditions have yet been met.

(3)

As of September 30, 2014 and 2013 these options had fully vested. These options were granted during the year ended September 30, 2013 and vested immediately upon granting. The Company recognized stock based compensation expense of $Nil during the year ended September 30, 2014 (2013: $1,002,500) in connection with these options. These amounts have been included in general and administrative expenses on the Company’s statement of operations.

(4)

As of September 30, 2014 none of these options had vested. These options were issued during the year ended September 30, 2014 and vest annually over a three year period commencing on the first anniversary of the date of the grant. The Company recognized stock based compensation expense of $9,252 during the year ended September 30, 2014, (2013: $Nil) in connection with these options. These amounts have been included in general and administrative expenses on the Company’s statement of operations.

F-28


Anavex Life Sciences Corp.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

September 30, 2014 and 2013
(Stated in US Dollars)2017 – Page 2416


Note 96Commitments(cont’d)(Continued)

b)d)

Stock–based Compensation Plan – (cont’d)


(5)

As of September 30, 2014 none of these options had vested. These options were issued during the year ended September 30, 2014 and vest annually over a four year period commencing on the first anniversary of the date of the grant. The Company recognized stock based compensation expense of $16,905 during the year ended September 30, 2014 (2013: $Nil) in connection with these options.

(Continued)

During the year ended September 30, 2014, 705,000 options expired for which the

The Company had recognized stock-basedstock based compensation expense of $Nil (2013: $Nil)$4,135,570 during the year ended September 30, 2014.2017 (2016: $4,452,267; 2015: $413,979) in connection with the issuance and vesting of stock options in exchange for services, and $Nil (2016: $610,000; 2015 $1,220,000), in connection with the vesting of restricted stock in exchange for services. These amounts have been included in general and administrative expenses and research and development expenses on the Company’s statement of operations as follows:

  2017 2016 2015
General and administrative $2,017,199  $3,208,220  $1,633,979 
Research and development  2,118,371   1,854,047    
Total share based compensation $4,135,570  $5,062,267  $1,633,979 

An amount of approximately $7,964,225 in stock based compensation is expected to be recorded over the remaining term of such options through June 30, 2020.

The fair value of stock options granted has been determinedeach option award is estimated on the date of grant using the Black-ScholesBlack Scholes option pricing model usingbased on the following weighted average assumptions applied toassumptions:

  2017 2016 2015
Risk-free interest rate  2.11%  1.28%  1.63%
Expected life of options (years)  6.86   5.88   6.30 
Annualized volatility  111.58%  114.75%  98.41 
Dividend rate  0.00%  0.00%  0.00%

The fair value of restricted stock options grantedcompensation charges recognized during the periods:

 20142013
Risk–free interestrate2.17%2.73%
Expected life of options (years)6.5010.0years
Annualized volatility91.21%71.39%
Dividend rate0.00%0.00%

There has been no stock-based compensation recognized in the financial statements for the yearyears ended September 30, 2014 (2013: $nil) for options that will vest upon2016 and 2015 was determined with reference to the achievement of performance milestones because the Company has determined that satisfactionquoted market price of the performance milestones was not probable. Compensation relating to stock options exercisable upon achieving performance milestones will be recognized inCompany’s shares on the period the milestones are achieved.commitment date.

F-29



Anavex Life Sciences Corp.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

September 30, 2014 and 2013
(Stated in US Dollars)2017 – Page 2517


Note 107Income Taxes

The tax effects of the temporary differences that give rise to the Company’s estimated deferred tax assets and liabilities are as follows:


   2014  2013 
 Taxrate 34%  34% 
        
 Net operating loss carry forwards$8,270,000  $7,141,000 
 Research and development tax credits 745,000  705,000 
 Foreign exchange (23,000) (19,000)
 Accrued bonuses 170,000  34,000 
 Intangible asset costs 70,000  51,000 
 Stock–based compensation 441,000  633,000 
 Valuation allowance for deferred tax assets (9,673,000) (8,545,000)
        
 Net deferred tax assets$ $ 

The tax effects of the temporary differences that give rise to the Company’s estimated deferred tax assets and liabilities are as follows:

  2017  2016  2015 
Assumed Tax rate  34  34  34
             
Net operating loss carryforwards $14,240,000  $11,223,000  $9,177,000 
Research and development tax credits  1,344,000   1,036,000   794,000 
Foreign exchange  (25,000)  (25,000)  (10,000)
Unpaid charges  28,000   152,000   832,000 
Intangible asset costs  51,000   57,000   64,000 
Stock-based compensation  3,394,000   2,004,000   581,000 
Valuation allowance for deferred tax assets  (19,032,000)  (14,447,000)  (11,438,000)
             
Net deferred tax assets $  $  $ 

The provision for income taxes differ from the amount established using the statutory income tax rate as follows:

   2014  2013 
        
 Income benefit at statutory rate of 34%$(3,865,000)$(1,258,000)
 Foreign income taxed at other rates 13,000   
 Permanent differences      
    Effect of stock based compensation 202,000   
    Debt extinguishment 2,736,000  501,000 
    Mark–to–market deriative liability adjustment (994,000) 7,000 
    Non–deductible finance and accretion expenses 808,000   
    Other permanent differences (16,000) (5,000)
 Research and development tax credit (26,000) (17,000)
 Adjustment and true up to prior years' tax provision 14,000  (161,000)
 Change in valuation allowance 1,128,000  933,000 
        
 Income Tax Expense$ $ 

  2017  2016  2015 
          
Income benefit at statutory rate of 34% $(4,577,000) $(5,010,000) $(4,117,000)
Foreign income taxed at other rates  68,000   132,000   80,000 
Permanent differences            
Debt extinguishment        (29,000)
Mark-to-market deriative liability adjustment        193,000 
Non-deductible finance and accretion expenses     5,000   1,511,000 
Non-deductible compensation costs     738,000     
Other permanent differences  2,000      (5,000)
Research and development tax credit  (23,000)  628,000   502,000 
Expiry of foreign net operating loss carryforwards     333,000    
Adjustment and true up to prior years’ tax provision  (55,000)  176,000   100,000 
Effect of foreign exchange and other     (11,000)   
Change in valuation allowance related to current year provision  4,585,000   3,009,000   1,765,000 
             
Income Tax Recovery $  $  $ 

As of September 30, 2014,2017, the Company had net operating loss carry-forwards of approximately $24,000,000 (2013: $21,000,000)$41,000,000 (2016: $33,000,000; 2015: $25,000,000) in the United States, approximately $850,000 (2016: $250,000; 2015: $Nil) in Australia and approximately $13,000 (2016: $Nil) in Germany, available to offset future taxable income.income in those jurisdictions. The carry-forwards will begin to expire in 2027 unless utilized in earlier years. The Company has not yet filed any tax returns in France or Australia.2027.

F-30



Anavex Life Sciences Corp.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

September 30, 2014 and 2013
(Stated in US Dollars)2017 – Page 2618 


Note 107Income Taxes(cont’d)(Continued)

The Company evaluates its valuation allowance requirements based on projected future operations. When circumstances change and this causes a change in management’s judgment about the recoverability of deferred tax assets, the impact of the change on the valuation allowance is reflected in current income. Because management of the Company does not currently believe that it is more likely than not that the Company will receive the benefit of these assets, a valuation allowance equal to the deferred tax asset has been established at September 30, 2017, 2016 and 2015.

Uncertain Tax Positions

The Company files income tax returns in the U.S. federal jurisdiction and various state and foreign jurisdictions. The Company’s tax returns are subject to tax examinations by U.S. federal and state tax authorities, or examinations by foreign tax authorities until the respective statutes of limitation expire. The Company is subject to tax examinations by tax authorities for all taxation years commencing on or after 2009.

Certain of the Company’s net operating loss carryforwardsin the United States may be subject to limitations by Section 382 of the Internal Revenue Code with respect to the amount utilizable each year. This limitation reduces the Company’s ability to utilize net operating loss carry-forwards, under certain circumstances. The Company completed a Section 382 analysis through the fiscal year ended September 30, 2017 and currently does not believe Section 382 will apply to limit the utilization of these tax losses.

The Company evaluates its valuation allowance requirements based on projected future operations. When circumstances change and this causes a change in management’s judgment about the recoverability of deferred tax assets, the impact of the change on the valuation allowance is reflected in current income. Because management of the Company does not currently believe that it is more likely than not that the Company will receive the benefit of these assets, a valuation allowance equal to the deferred tax asset has been established at both September 30, 2014 and 2013.

Note 8

Uncertain Tax Positions

The Company files income tax returns in the U.S. federal jurisdiction and various state and foreign jurisdictions. The Company’s tax returns are subject to tax examinations by U.S. federal and state tax authorities, or examinations by foreign tax authorities until the respective statutes of limitation expire. The Company is subject to tax examinations by tax authorities for all taxation years commencing on or after 2006.

Note 11

Supplemental Cash Flow Information

Investing and financing activities that do not have a direct impact on current cash flows are excluded from the statement of cash flows.

During the year ended September 30, 2016;

Investingi)

the Company issued 6,162 shares of common stock upon conversion of $6,162 in principal amount of convertible debentures at a conversion price of $1.00 per share and financing activities that do not have a direct impact on current cash flows are excluded from167,415 shares of common stock pursuant to the statementapplication of cash flows.

Duringan incorrect conversion price for conversion notices received during the year ended September 30, 2014;

2015;


Anavex Life Sciences Corp. 

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements 

September 30, 2017 – Page 19

a)Note 8Supplemental Cash Flow Information – (Continued)

During the year ended September 30, 2015;

i)the Company issued 7,272,487 shares of common stock and an additional 167,415 shares of common stock became issuable upon conversion of $7,439,900 in principal amount of convertible debentures at a conversion price of $1.00 per share;

ii)the Company reclassified an amount of $221,000$4,482,000 into equity upon modification of the terms of certain derivative instruments.

iii)
b)

the Company issued 6,378,426adjusted the price of 658,612 shares of common stock of the Companyfrom $2.00 to $1.00 per share pursuant to the conversion of $1,913,528 face value of convertible debentures at $0.30 per share;

c)

an anti-dilution provision contained in private placement subscription agreements dated May 31, 2012. Consequently, the Company issued 2,561,713658,612 shares of common stock of the Company at a fair value of $551,120 pursuant to the conversion of convertible debentures at a conversion price of $0.25 per share.

for no consideration.

F-31



Anavex Life Sciences Corp.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
September 30, 2014 and 2013
(Stated in US Dollars)  – Page 27


Note 11Supplemental Cash Flow Information– (cont’d)
During the year ended September 30, 2013;

a)

the Company issued three promissory notes in the principal amounts of $100,000, $87,865 (CDN$86,677) and $28,017 (CDN$27,639) in exchange for accounts payable owing to three vendors in respect of unpaid consulting fees.

b)

The Company issued 4,208,910 units of the Company at their fair value of $1.02 per unit to settle (i) interest bearing notes payable outstanding in the amount of $549,000; (ii) accrued interest in connection with the notes payable of $26,058 included in accounts payable and accrued liabilities; and (iii) accounts payable of $1,108,506. Each unit consisted of one common share and one common share purchase warrant exercisable into one additional common share for $0.75 per share until July 5, 2018. In addition, in connection with the settlement of $11,449 of accrued interest with respect to the notes payable was forgiven. The Company recorded a loss on debt settlement of $1,472,208 as a result of this transaction.


Note 12Subsequent Events
Subsequent to September 30, 2014;

a)

On October 22, 2014, the Company entered into a Securities Purchase Agreement (the “Purchase Agreement”) with one investor for an equity investment of $500,000 at a price of $0.25 per unit. Pursuant to the terms of the Purchase Agreement, the Company agreed to sell, and Lincoln Park agreed to purchase, 2,000,000 shares of common stock. In addition, the Company agreed to issue an aggregate of 4,000,000 stock purchase warrants, of which 2,000,000 are exercisable at $0.30 per share and 2,000,000 are exercisable at $0.42 per share, each for a period of five years, subject to adjustment for stock splits, combinations, and reclassification events.

b)

The Company issued an aggregate of 5,484,668 shares of common stock pursuant to the conversion of $1,371,167 face value of convertible debentures at $0.25 per share.

F-32


ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL MATTERS

Not Applicable

ITEM 9A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Disclosure Controls and Procedures

As required by Rule 13a-15 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, our management, with the participation of our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, evaluated our

We maintain disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) as of the end of the period covered by this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Disclosure controls and procedures are controls and other procedures that are designed to ensureprovide reasonable assurance that material information required to be disclosed in our periodic reports filed or submitted under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is recorded, processed, summarized, and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission’sSEC’s rules and forms. Disclosure controlsforms and procedures include controls and procedures designed to ensureprovide reasonable assurance that such information required to be disclosed in our reports filed under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is accumulated and communicated to our principalmanagement, our chief executive officer and our principal financial officer, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

Based on its We carried out an evaluation, our management,under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our principal executive and principal financial officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures, as defined in Rule 13(a)-15(e) under the Exchange Act. Based on this evaluation, our principal executive officer and principal financial officer concluded that as of the end of the period covered by this Annual Report on Form 10-K, our disclosure controls and procedures were not effective. The ineffectivenesseffective, as of our disclosure controls and procedures was due to internal control weaknesses further described below in Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting.September 30, 2017.

Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting

Management

Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over our financial reporting as such term is defined in RuleRules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Securities Exchange ActAct. Under the supervision and with the participation of 1934. Our chief executive officerour management, including our Principal Executive Officer and chief financial officer assessedPrincipal Financial Officer, we conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of September 30, 2014.

Basedbased on its evaluation undercriteria established in the framework in Internal Control—Control — Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission our management, with the participation(“COSO”).

Because of our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, concluded that ourits inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting wasmay not effective asprevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of September 30, 2014. The ineffectivenessany evaluation of our internal control over financial reporting was dueeffectiveness to future periods are subject to the existence of significant deficiencies constituting material weaknesses, as described in greater detail below. A material weakness is a control deficiency, or combination of control deficiencies, suchrisks that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of the annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis.

29


Material Weaknesses Identified

(1) Control environment - We did not maintain an effective control environment. The control environment, which is the responsibility of senior management, sets the tone of the organization, influences the control consciousness of its people, and is the foundation for all other components of internal control over financial reporting. Each of the following control environment material weaknesses also contributed to the material weaknesses discussed in items (2) and (3) below. Our control environment was ineffective because of the following material weaknesses:

(a)

We did not maintain a sufficient complement of personnel with an appropriate level of accounting knowledge, experience, and training in the application of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP) commensurate with our financial reporting requirements and business environment.

(b)

There was insufficient segregation of duties in our finance and accounting functions due to limited personnel. During the fiscal year ended September 30, 2014, we had limited staff that performed nearly all aspects of our financial reporting process, including, but not limited to, access to the underlying accounting records and systems, the ability to post and record journal entries and responsibility for the preparation of the financial statements. This creates certain incompatible duties and a lack of review over the financial reporting process that would likely result in a failure to detect errors in spreadsheets, calculations, or assumptions used to compile the financial statements and related disclosures as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. These control deficiencies could result in a material misstatement to our interim or annual financial statements that would not be prevented or detected; and

(2) Monitoring of internal control over financial reporting — we did not maintain effective monitoring controls to determine the adequacy of our internal control over financial reporting and related policies and procedures because of the following material weaknesses:

(a)

Our policies and procedures with respect to the review, supervision and monitoring of our accounting operations throughout the organization were either not designed and in place or not operating effectively.

(b)

We did not maintain an effective internal control monitoring function. Specifically, there were insufficient policies and procedures to effectively determine the adequacy of our internal control over financial reporting and to monitoring the ongoing effectiveness thereof.

Plan for Remediation of Material Weaknesses

We intend to take appropriate and reasonable steps to make improvements to remediate these deficiencies  through implementation of more robust review, supervision and monitoring of the financial reporting process as the adoption of the appropriate resources becomes economically feasible. We intend to consider the results of our remediation efforts and related testing as part of our year-end 2015 assessment of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting in light of our strategic plan.

Due to our size and nature, segregation of all conflicting duties has not always been possible and may not be economically feasible. However, we are in the process of implementing processes and procedures intended to mitigate any material weaknesses identified.

30


We believe that the foregoing steps will remediate the deficiencies identified above, and we intend to continue to monitor the effectiveness of these steps and make any changes that our management deems appropriate.

Limitations on Effectiveness of Controls

Our principal executive officer and principal financial officer does not expect that our disclosure controls and procedures or our internal control over financial reporting will prevent all errors and all fraud. A control system, no matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control system are met. Further, the design of a control system must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints, and the benefits of controls must be considered relative to their costs. Because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within our company have been detected. These inherent limitations include the realities that judgments in decision-making can be faulty, and that breakdowns can occur because of a simple error or mistake. Additional controls can be circumvented by the individual acts of some persons, by collusion of two or more people, or by management override of the controls. The design of any system of controls also is based in part upon certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events, and there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions; over time, controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate. Because

Based on this evaluation, our management concluded that our internal controls over financial reporting were effective as of September 30, 2017.

BDO USA, LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, has provided an attestation report on the inherent limitations in a cost-effectiveCompany’s internal control system, misstatements due to error or fraud may occur and not be detected.over financial reporting as of September 30, 2017, which is included herein.

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting identified in management’s evaluation pursuant to Rules 13a-15(d) or 15d-15(d) of the Exchange Act during the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 20142017 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

ITEM 9B OTHER INFORMATION

None.

31


PART III

ITEM 10 DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

Directors and Executive Officers

Our directors are to be elected at our annual meeting and each director elected is to hold office until his or her successor is elected and qualified. Our board of directors may remove our officers at any time.


Our directors and executive officers, their age, positions held, and duration of such, are as follows:

NamePositionAgeDate first appointed
Christopher Missling, PhDDirector, President, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, Secretary Treasurer4952July 5, 2013
Athanasios SkarpelosDirector4751January 9, 2013
Bernd Metzner, PhDDirector4447May 7, 2014
Elliot Favus, MDDirector3943May 7, 2014
Steffen Thomas, PhDDirector51June 15, 2015
Peter Donhauser, D.O.Director52February 8, 2017
Sandra BoenischPrincipal Financial Officer, Treasurer36October 1, 2015

Business Experience

The following is a brief account of the education and business experience of directors and executive officers during at least the past five years, indicating their principal occupation during the period, and the name and principal business of the organization by which they were employed.

Christopher Missling, PhD. Christopher Missling has over twenty (20) years of healthcare industry experience in big pharmaceutical, biotech industry and investment banking. Most recently, from March 2007 until his appointment by our company, Mr. Missling served as the head of healthcare investment banking at Brimberg & Co. in New York, New York. Also, Mr. Missling served as the Chief Financial Officer of Curis, Inc. (NASDAQ:CRIS) and ImmunoGen, Inc. (NASDAQ:IMGN). Mr. Missling earned his MS and PhD from the University of Munich and an MBA from Northwestern University Kellogg School of Management and WHU Otto Beisheim School of Management.

Athanasios Skarpelos. Athanasios (Tom) Skarpelos is a self-employed investor with 1718 years of experience working with private and public companies. For the past 10 years, he has been focused on biotechnology companies involved in drug discovery and drug development projects. Mr. Skarpelos was engaged as a consultant to our company for one year effective August 2, 2010. His experience has led to relationships with researchers at academic institutes in Europe and North America. Mr. Skarpelos is a founder of Anavex.

Bernd Metzner, PhD. Bernd Metzner is currently the Chief Financial Officer of the DoehlerStroeer Group, a global producermedia and provider of technology-based natural ingredientsonline advertisement company, where he has been CFO for the foodlast three and beverage industry with sales activities in more than 130 countries. Previously, he was Chief Administration Officer and member of the Board of Management of Bayer Schering Pharma AG, the pharmaceutical division of $100+ billion market cap company Bayer AG. In this position, Dr. Metzner had worldwide financial responsibility for the Bayer Pharma Group. During his almost 10-years with Bayer AG, Dr. Metzner also held several senior international management positions in the corporate finance organization of Bayer AG, including Chief Financial Officer of Bayer S.p.A. Italy and heading the coordination of the successful spin-off of Lanxess, a specialty chemicals group.half years. Dr. Metzner started his career at the law firm Flick Gocke Schaumburg and has a degree in business administration from the University of Siegen. After obtaining his doctorate from University of Siegen, he became a chartered accountant.

32


Elliot Favus, MD. Elliot Favus is Chief Executive Officer of Favus Institutional Research, a healthcare research firm serving institutional investors. He has been a healthcare equity research analyst on Wall Street since 2006, starting at Lazard Capital Markets and subsequently at Och-Ziff Capital Management Group. Prior to working on Wall Street, Dr. Favus was an Instructor in medicine at Mount Sinai School of Medicine in New York. He attended the University of Michigan (BA, 1996), the University of Chicago Pritzker School of Medicine (MD, 2001) and the NYU-Bellevue Hospital Internal Medicine Residency Program (2004). He is board-certified in Internal Medicine (2004) and has 10 years of basic science laboratory experience working on human genetics projects at Harvard Medical School, the University of Chicago and the University of Pittsburgh.

Steffen Thomas, PhDSteffen Thomas, has over 15 years of experience as a European patent attorney and is currently practicing at Epping Hermann Fischer, a major intellectual property law firm in Europe. Previously, he worked for Japan-based Takeda Pharmaceutical Company, the largest pharmaceutical company in Asia and a top firm worldwide, as an in-house patent attorney. Prior to that, he worked for Nycomed Pharma, acquired by Takeda in 2011 for approximately USD $10 billion. Dr. Thomas’ legal practice covers drafting of patent applications, prosecuting patent applications before national and international patent offices, defending and challenging patents in opposition, appeal, and nullity proceedings, enforcing patents before the infringement courts, and preparing opinions on patentability and infringement in the technical field of chemistry. Dr. Thomas has particular expertise in small molecule pharmaceuticals. He holds MS and PhD degrees in Chemistry from the University of Munich.


Peter Donhauser, D.O. Peter Donhauser, had more than 20 years of expertise in clinical research prior to practicing osteopathic medicine with an integrated medical approach in private practice beginning in 2000. He worked at the University Hospital of Munich in the fields of geriatrics and neuromusculoskeletal diseases.  During this time, he was a clinical trial investigator in multiple Phase 3 studies, including studies sponsored by Merck Sharp & Dohme, Merck, Boehringer Mannheim, Roche, Servier and Sanofi. He received his human medicine degree at the University of Munich and Doctor of Osteopathic Medicine (D.O.) from the German-American Academy for Osteopathy, or DAAO, a member of the European Register for Osteopathic Physicians, or EROP, at the Philadelphia College of Osteopathic Medicine. He has served as a director of the Company since February 8, 2017.

Sandra Boenisch, CPA, CGA Ms. Boenisch is a Chartered Professional Accountant (CPA, CGA) with 14 years of accounting, audit, and financial reporting experience in a variety of industries, both in the United States and Canada. Ms. Boenisch has been an independent consultant, providing financial reporting services to a range of public companies in the United States and Canada since January 2012. From 2008 until 2012, Ms. Boenisch was employed at BDO Canada LLP (Vancouver, BC) where she was hired as a Senior Accountant and was later promoted to Manager, Audit Assurance. Ms. Boenisch specialized in managing assurance engagements for public companies in the United States and Canada. Prior to that, Ms. Boenisch worked for another public accounting firm from 2001 to 2008. As an independent consultant, Ms. Boenisch has acquired considerable experience in finance, governance, and regulatory compliance. She holds a BComm from Laurentian University.

Family Relationships

There are no family relationships between any director or executive officer.

Involvement in Certain Legal Proceedings

There are no material proceedings to which any director or executive officer or any associate of any such director or officer is a party adverse to our company or has a material interest adverse to our company.

No director or executive officer has been involved in any of the following events during the past ten years:

1.

any bankruptcy petition filed by or against any business of which such person was a general partner or executive officer either at the time of the bankruptcy or within two years prior to that time;

2.

any conviction in a criminal proceeding or being subject to a pending criminal proceeding (excluding traffic violations and other minor offences);

3.

being subject to any order, judgment, or decree, not subsequently reversed, suspended or vacated, of any court of competent jurisdiction, permanently or temporarily enjoining, barring, suspending or otherwise limiting his involvement in any type of business, securities or banking activities;

4.

being found by a court of competent jurisdiction (in a civil action), the Securities and Exchange Commission or the Commodity Futures Trading Commission to have violated a federal or state securities or commodities law, and the judgment has not been reversed, suspended, or vacated;

5.

being the subject of, or a party to, any federal or state judicial or administrative order, judgment, decree, or finding, not subsequently reversed, suspended or vacated, relating to an alleged violation of: (i) any federal or state securities or commodities law or regulation; or (ii) any law or regulation respecting financial institutions or insurance companies including, but not limited to, a temporary or permanent injunction, order of disgorgement or restitution, civil money penalty or temporary or permanent cease- and- desist order, or removal or prohibition order; or (iii) any law or regulation prohibiting mail or wire fraud or fraud in connection with any business entity; or

33



6.

being the subject of, or a party to, any sanction or order, not subsequently reversed, suspended or vacated, of any self-regulatory organization (as defined in Section 3(a)(26) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934), any registered entity (as defined in Section 1(a)(29) of the Commodity Exchange Act), or any equivalent exchange, association, entity or organization that has disciplinary authority over its members or persons associated with a member.

Compliance with Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 requires our executive officers and directors and persons who own more than 10% of our common stock to file with the Securities and Exchange Commission initial statements of beneficial ownership, reports of changes in ownership and annual reports concerning their ownership of our common stock and other equity securities, on Forms 3, 4 and 5 respectively. Executive officers, directors and greater than 10% shareholders are required by the Securities and Exchange Commission regulations to furnish us with copies of all Section 16(a) reports that they file.

Based solely on our review of the copies of such formsreports and amendments thereto received by us, or written representations from certain reporting persons,that no filings were required, we believe that during fiscal year ended September 30, 2014, all Section 16(a) filing requirements applicable to our executive officers and directors and greater than 10% percent beneficial ownersstockholders were complied.met for the year ended September 30, 2017.

Code of Ethics

We have adopted a code of ethics that applies to our directors, principal executive officer, principal financial officer, principal accounting officer or controller, or persons performing similar functions.functions, and to all employees. We have posted our policy on our website atwww.anavex.com.

Audit Committee and Audit Committee Financial Experts

We do not have a standing audit committee at

The members of the present time. We believe that ourAudit Committee are Bernd Metzner (Chairman), Athanasios Skarpelos and Steffen Thomas. Our board of directors is capable of analyzing and evaluating our financial statements and understanding internal controls and procedures for financial reporting. The board of directors of our company does not believehas determined that itBernd Metzner is necessary to have an audit committee at this time because management believes the functions of an audit committee can be adequately performed by the board of directors.

Except for Dr. Metzner, we do not deem any of our directors as an “audit committee financial expert” as defined in Item 407(d)(5)(ii) of Regulation S-K.by applicable SEC and Nasdaq rules.

Nominating

The Audit Committee oversees and Compensation Committees

We do not have standing nominating or compensation committees, or committees performing similar functions. Ourreports to our board of directors believeson various auditing and accounting-related matters, including, among other things, the maintenance of the integrity of our financial statements, reporting process and internal controls; the selection, evaluation, compensation and retention of our independent registered public accounting firm; legal and regulatory compliance, including our disclosure controls and procedures; and oversight over our risk management policies and procedures.


The Audit Committee operates under a charter that it is not necessary to have a standing compensation committee at this time because the functions of such committee are adequately performedwas adopted by our board of directors. Our board

Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee

The members of our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee are Bernd Metzner (Chairman), Steffen Thomas and Peter Donhauser.

The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee is appointed by the Board to oversee and evaluate the Board’s performance and the company’s compliance with corporate governance regulations, guidelines and principles, to identify individuals qualified to become Board members, to recommend to the Board proposed nominees for Board membership, and to recommend to the Board directors has not adopted a charter for the compensationto serve on each standing committee.

34


Our boardCompensation Committee

The members of directors also is of the view that it is appropriate for us not to have a standing nominating committee becauseour Compensation Committee are Bernd Metzner (Chairman), Steffen Thomas and Peter Donhauser.

The Compensation Committee assists our board of directors has performed and is expectedin discharging its responsibilities relating to perform adequately the functions of a nominating committee. Our board of directors has not adopted a charter for the nominating committee. There has not been any defined policy or procedure requirements for stockholders to submit recommendations or nomination for directors. Our board of directors does not believe that a defined policy with regard to the consideration of candidates recommended by stockholders is necessary at this time because we believe that, at this stagecompensation of our development, a specific nominating policy would be prematuredirectors and executive officers. Its responsibilities include, among other things, reviewing, approving and recommending compensation programs and arrangements applicable to our officers; determining the objectives of little assistance until our business operations are at a more advanced level. There are no specific, minimum qualifications thatexecutive officer compensation programs; overseeing the evaluation of our senior executives; administering our incentive compensation plans and equity-based plans, including reviewing and granting equity awards to our executive officers; and reviewing and approving director compensation and benefits. The Compensation Committee can delegate to other members of our board of directors, believesor an officer or officers of the Company, the authority to review and grant stock-based compensation for employees who are not executive officers.

The Compensation Committee has the responsibilities and authority designated by Nasdaq rules. Specifically, the Compensation Committee has the sole discretion to select and receive advice from a compensation consultant, legal counsel or other adviser and is directly responsible for oversight of their work. The Compensation Committee must also determine reasonable compensation to be metpaid to such advisors by us.

Prior to the formation of our Compensation Committee, our board of directors performed the functions that would have been handled by the Compensation Committee.

The Compensation Committee operates under a candidate recommendedcharter that was adopted by our board of directors. There is neither a defined, nor a typical process of identifying and evaluating nominees for director.

ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

The Company’s compensation objectives are to offer our executive officers compensation and benefits that are competitive and meet our goals of attracting, retaining and motivating highly skilled, talented management, which is necessary for the Company to achieve its financial and strategic objectives and create long-term value for our stockholders.

A significant portion of the Company’s executive compensation opportunity is related to factors that directly and indirectly influence shareholder value, including long-term stock performance and operational performance. We believe the levels of compensation we provide should be competitive, reasonable and appropriate for our business needs and circumstances.

Our Executive Compensation Program and Philosophy

The intent of the Company’s compensation program is to attract and retain talent, to create incentives for and to reward excellent performance. We seek to compensate our executives in a manner that is competitive, rewards performance that creates shareholder value, recognizes individual contributions, and encourages long-term value creation.


The Compensation Committee meets at least twice per year to review and evaluate executive compensation and each executive officer’s performance. The Compensation Committee utilizes quantitative and qualitative factors, including the accomplishment of initiatives, attitude, and leadership and applies overall judgment to assess performance, taking into account the financial condition of the Company. Ultimately, the Compensation Committee seeks to evaluate, based on the achievement of financial and nonfinancial objectives, the variable compensation, including special awards, of executive officers of the Company and decide on the base salary and target discretionary bonus for such persons taking into account relevant benchmark data.

The Compensation Committee believes that a significant portion of each executive’s compensation opportunity should be tied to variable compensation and value creation for shareholders. The Compensation Committee believes this mix provides an appropriate balance between the financial security required to attract and retain qualified individuals, and the Compensation Committee’s goal of ensuring that executive compensation rewards performance that benefits shareholders over the long term.

Compensation Consultants

The Compensation Committee makes recommendations to the Board for all compensation for executives, including the structure and design of the compensation programs. The Compensation Committee is responsible for retaining and terminating compensation consultants and determining the terms and conditions of their engagement.

Annual Discretionary Cash Bonuses

The Company has an annual discretionary cash bonus program. The Compensation Committee, or board of directors works with the Chief Executive Officer to evaluate the Company’s financial performance and overall financial condition to determine if discretionary bonuses are to be paid.

Benefits

The Company’s executives are entitled to participate in employee benefit plans, programs and arrangements implemented by the Company and generally available to all salaried employees, such as medical, dental and insurance programs. Executives are also allowed to participate in the Company’s tax-qualified 401(k) Plan offered to all similarly situated full-time employees.

Summary Compensation

The particulars of compensation paid to the following personsour named executive officers for the last twothree completed fiscal years:


Name and Principal
Position
 Year  Salary
($)
  Bonus
($)
  Stock
Awards
($)
  Option
Awards
($)
  Other
Compensation
($)
  Total
($)
 
                      
Christopher Missling,  2017   500,000         2,285,600      2,785,600 
PhD(1)  2016   305,000         8,495,900   2,290,340(2)  11,091,240 
President, Chief Executive  2015   240,000      1,220,000(3)  1,151,309   1,128,064(2)  3,739,373 
Officer, and Director                            
Sandra Boenisch(4)  2017   71,800(5)        177,800      249,600 
Principal Financial Officer  2016   58,000(5)        407,400      465,400 
and Treasurer  2015                   

a)

our principal executive officers;

b)

each of our two most highly compensated executive officers who were serving as executive officers at the end of the fiscal year ended September 30, 2014 who had total compensation exceeding $100,000; and

c)

up to two additional individuals for whom disclosure would have been provided under (b) but for the fact that the individual was not serving as our executive officer at the end of the most recently completed financial year, who we will collectively refer to as the named executive officers, for our fiscal years ended September 30, 2014 and 2013, are set out in the following summary compensation table:


      Other 
      Annual 
    StockOptionCompen- 
Name and Principal SalaryBonusAwardsAwardssationTotal
PositionYear($)($)($)($)($)($)
Christopher Missling,2014240,000400,000(2)Nil16,888Nil656,888
PhD(1)201360,000Nil1,600,000(3)1,002,500Nil2,662,500
President, Chief       
Executive Officer, Chief       
Financial Officer and       
Director       

(1)

Christopher Missling was appointed as director, President, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, Secretary and TreasurerSecretary on July 5, 2013.

(2)The compensation was recorded in connection with the Company’s payment of an income tax withholding obligation arising as a result of the vesting of restricted stock awards during the years ended September 30, 2016 and 2015, in accordance with the terms of Dr. Missling’s employment agreement dated July 5, 2013.

(3)The bonus was a result of the successful financing in March 2014.

(3)

Mr. Missling was granted 4,000,000 shares of restricted common stock that vest upon the occurrence of certain financial and clinical milestones. The value of stock awards issued to Christopher Missling is presented at the quoted market price of these shares on the date of issuance in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718 for the awards that were expected to vest at the date of issuance.

35


(4)Ms. Boenisch’s employment became effective on October 1, 2015.

(5)Compensation to Ms. Boenisch denominated in Canadian Dollars and has been translated to US dollars at an exchange rate of 0.7978 during the year ended September 30, 2017.

ConsultingEmployment Agreements

Christopher Missling

In connection with Mr. Missling’s appointment as Chief Executive Officer, the Company

We and Mr.Dr. Missling entered into an employment agreement commencing ondated July 5, 2013, as amended and endingextended on July 5, 2016 whereby: (a)and as amended and restated on July 18, 2016, or the Company shallEmployment Agreement, whereby we agree to pay to Mr.Dr. Missling an initial monthlyannual base salary of $20,000 with Mr.$500,000. In addition, Dr. Missling beingis eligible to earn an annual cash bonus for bonuseseach whole or partial calendar year of up to $100,000 and salary increases; (b) Mr. Missling received a sign-on stock option grant; (c) Mr. Missling shall receive a restricted stock grant subject to certain vesting milestones; (d) Mr. Missling shall be able to participate in the Company’sour employee benefit plans; and (e) the Companyplans. We have agreed to indemnify Mr.Dr. Missling in connection with his provision of services to us.

During the Company.year ended September 30, 2016, in connection with the Employment Agreement, Dr. Missling was granted options with a value of Two Million Dollars ($2,000,000) to purchase shares of our common stock, which was equal to 379,625 options at an exercise price of $6.26. These options are vesting quarterly over a three year period ending in July, 2019. In addition, Dr. Missling was granted options to purchase 861,429 shares of the our common stock at an exercise price of $7.06, which options are vesting quarterly over a three-year period ending in July, 2019.

Sandra Boenisch

We and Ms. Boenisch entered into an employment agreement dated October 1, 2015, as amended and extended effective October 1, 2017 whereby we shall pay to Ms. Boenisch an annual base salary of $120,000 Canadian dollars. Ms. Boenisch is eligible for bonuses which are anticipated to be up to 25% of her annual base salary, and for discretionary salary increases. Ms. Boenisch may also participate in our employee benefit plans.


Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End

The following table sets forth for each named executive officer and director certain information concerning the outstanding equity awards as of September 30, 2014.2017.

     Option Awards      Stock Awards       
Name Number of
Securities
Underlying
Exercisable
Options
(#)
  Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercisable
Options
(#)
  Equity
Incentive
Plan
Awards:
Number
of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Unearned
Options
(#)
  Option
Exercise
Price
($)
 Option
Expiration
Date
 Number
of
Shares
of
Units of
Stock
that have
not
Vested
(#)
  Market
Value of
Shares or
Units of
Stock that
have not
Vested
($)
  Equity
Incentive
Plan
Awards:
Number
of
Unearned
Shares,
Units or
Other
Rights
that have
not
Vested
(#)
  Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Market or Payout Value of Unearned Shares, Units or Other Rights that have not Vested ($) 
Christopher Missling 500,000      1.60 July 5, 2023        
 93,750  31,250    1.32 May 8, 2024            
  500,000      0.92 April 2, 2025            
  140,625  46,875    5.04 Sept 18, 2025            
  126,542  253,083    6.26 July 5, 2026            
  287,143  574,286    7.06 July 18, 2026            
  500,000      3.28 Sept 22, 2026            
  75,000  375,000    5.92 May 12, 2027            
                          
Athanasios Skarpelos 50,000      0.92 April 2, 2025        
 100,000      3.28 Sep 22, 2026            
                          
Bernd Metzner 37,500      1.20 May 7, 2024        
 50,000      0.92 April 2, 2025            
  100,000      3.28 Sept 22, 2026            
                          
Elliot Favus 37,500      1.20 May 7, 2024        
  50,000      0.92 April 2, 2025            
  1,500      5.64 Sept 30, 2025            
  1,500      5.57 Dec 31, 2025            
  1,500      4.90 Mar 31, 2026            
  1,500      5.66 April 27, 2026            
  1,500      6.11 June 30, 2026            
  100,000      3.28 Sept 22, 2026            
                          
Steffen Thomas 33,333  16,667    1.76 June 15, 2025        
 100,000      3.28 Sept 22, 2026            
                          
Peter Donhauser   50,000    5.39 Feb 8, 2027        
                         
                          
Sandra Boenisch 16,667  8,333    5.68 Oct 2, 2026        
 106,696      3.28 Sept 22, 2026            
 5,834  29,166    5.92 May 12, 2027            

 Option AwardsStock Awards
Name
Number of
Securities
Underlying
Exercisable
Options
(#)
Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercisable
Options
(#)
Equity
Incentive
Plan
Awards:
Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Unearned
Options
(#)
Option
Exercise
Price
($)

Option
Expiration
Date

Number
of
Shares of
Units of
Stock
that have
not
Vested
(#)

Market
Value of
Shares or
Units of
Stock that
have not
Vested
($)
Equity
Incentive
Plan
Awards:
Number
of
Unearned
Shares,
Units or
Other
Rights
that
have
not
Vested
(#)
Equity
Incentive
Plan
Awards:
Market or
Payout
Value of
Unearned
Shares,
Units or
Other
Rights that
have not
Vested
($)
Christopher2,000,000NilNil0.40July 5, 20233,000,000540,000NilNil
MisslingNil500,000Nil0.33May 8, 2024    
          
Athanasios SkarpelosNilNilNilN/AN/ANilN/ANilN/A
          
Bernd MetznerNil150,000Nil0.30N/ANilN/ANilN/A
          
Elliot FavusNil150,000Nil0.30N/ANilN/ANilN/A

We have not adopted any other equity compensation plan other than our 2007 Stock Option Plan

Our board of directors adopted an Omnibus Incentive Plan, the 2015 Plan, which was approved by our board on September 18, 2015. The 2015 Plan provides for the grant of stock options and restricted stock awards to our directors, officers, employees and consultants.

The maximum number of our common shares reserved for issue under the plan is 6,050,553 shares, subject to adjustment in the event of a change of our capitalization. As a result of the adoption of the 2015 Plan, no further option awards will be granted under any previously existing stock option plan. Stock option awards previously granted under previously existing stock option plans remain outstanding in accordance with their terms.

The 2015 Plan is administered by the board of directors, except that it may, in its discretion, delegate such responsibility to a committee of such board. The exercise price will be determined by the board of directors at the time of grant, and the exercise price of each option shall be at least the fair market value on the grant date; provided, however, that in the event that a grantee owns more than 10% of our common stock as of the date of grant, the exercise price of an option granted to such grantee that is intended to be an incentive stock option shall be not less than 110% of the fair market value on the date of grant. Stock options may be granted under the 2015 Plan for an exercise period of up to ten years from the date of grant of the option or such lesser periods as may be determined by the board, subject to earlier termination in accordance with the terms of the 2015 Plan.

Compensation of Directors

36


The table below shows the compensation of our directors who were not our named executive officers for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2014:2017:

    Non-EquityNonqualified  
 Fees EarnedStockOptionIncentive PlanDeferredAll Other 
 or Paid inAwardsAwardsCompensationCompensation  Compensation  Total
NameCash($)($)($)Earnings ($)($)($)
 ($)      
Athanasios SkarpelosNilNilNilNilNilNilNil
        
Bernd Metzner5,000Nil4,626NilNilNil9,626
        
Elliot FavusNilNil4,626NilNilNil4,626

Name 

 

Fees Earned or Paid in Cash
($) 

  

Stock
Awards
($) 

  

Option
Awards
($) 

  Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation ($)  Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Earnings ($)  

All Other Compensation ($) 

  



Total
($) 

 
Athanasios Skarpelos                     
Bernd Metzner  16,000                  16,000 
Elliot Favus                     
Steffen Thomas                     
Peter Donhauser        231,300            231,300 

We reimburse our directorshave agreed to compensate Bernd Metzner $4,000 per quarter for expenses incurred in connection with attending board meetings.

Duringperforming the fiscal year ended September 30, 2014, there were no standard arrangements pursuant to which anyfunctions of Chairman of our directors were compensated for services provided in their capacity as directors.Audit Committee, Compensation Committee and Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee.

We currently have no formal plan for compensating our

In addition, directors for their services in their capacity as directors, although we may elect to issue stock options to such persons in the future. Directors are entitled to reimbursement for reasonable travel and other out-of-pocket expenses incurred in connection with attendance at meetings of our board of directors. Our board of directors may award further special remuneration to any director undertaking any special services on our behalf other than services ordinarily required of a director.

Retirement or Similar Benefit Plans

There are no arrangements or plans in which we provide retirement or similar benefits for our directors or executive officers.


Resignation, Retirement, Other Termination, or Change in Control Arrangements

Our employment agreementEmployment Agreement with ChristopherDr. Missling PhD contains provisions regarding our obligations to Mr. Missling upon his termination and upon a change of control. In the event of a change of control, as such term is defined in the employment agreement, all of the restrictedpreviously granted but unvested stock granted to Mr.options held by Dr. Missling shall vest. Depending on the nature of the termination of Mr.Dr. Missling’s services, certain of his salary, bonus and granted securities shall vest in the amounts at such time as set forth in the agreement.Employment Agreement. A copy of Dr. Missling’s Employment Agreement is set forth in its entirety as an exhibit to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on July 22, 2016.

Our employment agreement with Sandra Boenisch contains provisions regarding our obligations to Ms. Boenisch upon a change of control. In the event of a change of control, as such term is defined in the employment agreement, all of the remaining unvested option shares granted to Ms. Boenisch will immediately vest with no restrictions on purchase or sales. A copy of Ms. Boenisch’s employment agreement is set forth in its entirety as an exhibit hereto.

Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation

None of our directors who currently serve as members of our compensation committee is, or has at any time during the past year been, one of our officers or employees. None of our executive officers currently serves, or in the past year has served, as a member of the board of directors or compensation committee of any other entity that has one or more executive officers serving on our board of directors or compensation committee.

Compensation Committee Report

The Compensation Committee has reviewed and discussed with management the Compensation Discussion and Analysis and has recommended to the Company’s Quarterlyboard of directors that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in this Annual Report on Form 10-Q filed with10-K for the SEC on August 14, 2013.year ended September 30, 2017.

37


The members of our Compensation Committee are Bernd Metzner (Chairman), Steffen Thomas and Peter Donhauser.

ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT ANDRELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERSMATTERS.

The following table sets forth, as of December 15, 2014,8, 2017, certain information with respect to the beneficial ownership of our common stock by each stockholder known by us to be the beneficial owner of more than 5% of our common stock and by each of our current directors and our named executive officers and by our current directors and executive officers as a group. We have determined the number and percentage of shares beneficially owned by such person in accordance with Rule 13d-3 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. This information does not necessarily indicate beneficial ownership for any other purpose.


Title of class
Name and address of
beneficial owner
Amount and nature of
beneficial ownership
Percent of
class(1)
     
Common Stock


Athanasios Skarpelos
(Director)
2, Place du Port
Geneva, Switzerland CH 1204
5,225,832


Direct


9.4%


     
Common Stock



Christopher Missling
(Officer/Director)
51 W 552nd Street,
7th floor
New York, NY 10019
3,000,000(2)






5.2%



     
Common Stock


Bernd Metzner (Director)
51 W 552ndStreet,
7thFloor
New York, NY 10019
Nil




Nil


     
Common Stock


Elliot Favus(Director)
51 W 552ndStreet,
7thFloor
New York, NY 10019
Nil




Nil


     
Common StockDirectors & ExecutiveOfficers as a group (4persons)8,225,83214.3%

Title of class Name and address of
beneficial owner
 Amount and nature of
beneficial ownership
  Percent of
class(1)
 
         
Common Stock Christopher Missling  3,495,277(2)  7.5%
  (CEO/Director)        
           
Common Stock Athanasios Skarpelos  1,456,458(3)  3.3%
  (Director)        
           
Common Stock Bernd Metzner (Director)  187,500(4)  * 
           
Common Stock Elliot Favus (Director)  195,000(5)  * 


Title of class Name and address of
beneficial owner
 Amount and nature of
beneficial ownership
  Percent of
class(1)
 
         
Common Stock Steffen Thomas (Director)  133,333(6)  * 
           
Common Stock Peter Donhauser (Director)  (7)  * 
           
Common Stock Sandra Boenisch (Principal  157,160(8)  * 
  Financial Officer)        
           
Common Stock Directors & Executive Officers as a group (7 persons)  5,624,728   11.8%

*Less than 1%

(1)

Percentage of ownership is based on 54,684,905 shares44,220,833 of our common stock issued and outstanding as of December 15, 2014.8, 2017. Except as otherwise indicated, we believe that the beneficial owners of the common stock listed above, based on information furnished by such owners, have sole investment and voting power with respect to such shares, subject to community property laws where applicable. Beneficial ownership is determined in accordance with the rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission and generally includes voting or investment power with respect to securities. Shares of common stock subject to options or warrants currently exercisable or exercisable within 60 days, are deemed outstanding for purposes of computing the percentage ownership of the person holding such option or warrants, but are not deemed outstanding for purposes of computing the percentage ownership of any other person.

38



(2)

Includes 2,000,000options to purchase 500,000 shares of our common stock at $1.60 per share, options to purchase 93,750 shares of our common stock at $1.32 per share, options to purchase 500,000 shares of our common stock at $0.92 per share, options to purchase 156,250 shares of our common stock at $5.04 per share, options to purchase 156,250 shares of our common stock at $6.26 per share, options to purchase 430,715 shares of our common stock at $7.06 per share, options to purchase 500,000 shares of our common stock at $3.28 per share, and options to purchase 112,500 shares of our common stock at $5.92 per share that have vested and 1,000,000or are vesting within 60 days. Excludes options to purchase 31,250 shares of restrictedour common stock at $1.32 per share, options to purchase 31,250 shares of our common stock at $5.04 per share, options to purchase 189,813 shares of our common stock at $6.26 per share, options to purchase 430,715 shares of our common stock at $7.06 per share, and options to purchase 337,500 shares of our common stock at $5.92 per share that do not vest within 60 days.

(3)Includes options to purchase 50,000 shares of our common stock at $0.92 per share and options to purchase 100,000 shares of our common stock at $3.28 per share that have vested pursuantor are vesting within 60 days.

(4)Includes options to the achievement of certain objectives. Does not include 3,000,000purchase 37,500 shares of restrictedour common stock at $1.20 per share, options to purchase 50,000 shares of our common stock at $0.92 per share, and options to purchase 100,000 shares of our common stock at $3.28 per share that vest pursuant to the achievement of certain objectives.

have vested or are vesting within 60 days.

(5)Includes options to purchase 37,500 shares of our common stock at $1.20 per share, options to purchase 50,000 shares of our common stock at $0.92 per share, options to purchase 1,500 shares of our common stock at $5.64 per share, options to purchase 1,500 shares of our common stock at 5.57 per share, options to purchase 1,500 shares of our common stock at $4.90 per share, options to purchase 1,500 shares of our common stock at $4.90, options to purchase 1,500 shares of our common stock at $5.66 per share, options to purchase 1,500 shares of our common stock at $6.11 per share, and options to purchase 100,000 shares of our common stock at $3.28 per share that have vested or are vesting within 60 days.

(6)Includes options to purchase 33,333 shares of our common stock at $1.68 per share and options to purchase 100,000 shares of our common stock at $3.28 per share that have vested or are vesting within 60 days. Excludes options to purchase 16,667 shares of our common stock at $1.68 per share that do not vest within 60 days.

(7)Excludes options to purchase 50,000 shares of our common stock at $5.39 per share that do not vest within 60 days.


(8)Includes options to purchase 18,750 shares of our common stock at $5.68 per share and options to purchase 106,696 shares of our common stock at $3.28 per share and options to purchase 8,751 shares of our common stock at $5.92 per share that have vested or are vesting within 60 days. Excludes options to purchase 6,250 shares of our common stock at $5.68 per share and options to purchase 26,249 shares of our common stock at $5.92 per share that do not vest within 60 days.

ChangesChange in Control

We are unaware of any contract or other arrangement the operation of which may at a subsequent date result in a change of control of our company.Company.

ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE

Transactions with related persons

Our Code of Business Conduct and Audit Committee Charter set forth our policies and procedures for the review and approval of transactions with related persons, including transactions that would be required to be disclosed in this Annual Report on Form 10-K in accordance with SEC rules.

In circumstances where one of our directors or executive officers, or a family member, has a direct or indirect material interest in a transaction with the Company, our Corporate Governance Committee must review and approve all such proposed transactions. In determining whether to approve or ratify a transaction with a related person, among the factors the Audit Committee may consider (as applicable) are: the business purpose for entering into the transaction, the size and terms of the transaction, the availability of alternative sources of comparable products or services, whether the transaction could impair the judgment of the related person in performing his or her duties and whether the transaction would be consistent with NASDAQ’s requirements for independent directors, and any other factors the Audit Committee deems relevant.

There have been no other transactions, since October 1, 2013,2016, or currently proposed transactions, in which we were or are to be a participant and the amount involved exceeds the lesser of $120,000, or one percent of the average of our total assets at year end for the last two completed fiscal years, and in which any of the following persons had or will have a direct or indirect material interest.

i.

any director or executive officer of our company;

ii.

any beneficial owner of shares carrying more than 5% of the voting rights attached to our outstanding shares of common stock; and

iii.

any member of the immediate family (including spouse, parents, children, siblings and in-laws) of any of the foregoing persons.

Compensation of Named Executive Officers and Directors

For information regarding compensation of named executive officers and directors, please see “Item 11. Executive Compensation.”

Director Independence

We deem that Christopher Missling, PhD is not independent as that term is defined by NASDAQ 5605(a)(2) because Mr. Missling serves as our President, Chief Executive Officer, Secretary, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer. We have also determined that Athanasios Skarpelos is not independent as that term is defined by NASDAQ 5605(a)(2).Secretary.

We deem that Bernd Metzner, and Elliot Favus, Athanasios Skarpelos, Steffen Thomas and Peter Donhauser are independent as that term is defined by NASDAQ 5605(a)(2).

39



ITEM 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES

Fees Paid to Our Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The following table sets forth the aggregate fees billed or expected to be billed to our company for professional services rendered by our independent registered public accounting firm, for the fiscal years ended September 30, 20142017 and 2013:2016:

 20142013
   
Audit Fees$86,000$50,000
   
Audit Related Fees$29,125Nil
   
Tax FeesNilNil
   
All Other FeesNilNil
   
Total Fees$115,125$50,000

  2017 2016
Audit Fees $203,989  $173,359 
Audit Related Fees      
Tax Fees  1,029    
All Other Fees      
Total Fees $205,018  $173,359 

Audit Fees. Consist of fees billed for professional services rendered for the audits of our financial statements, reviews of our interim financial statements included in quarterly reports, services performed in connection with regular filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission and other services that are normally provided by our independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal years ended September 30, 20142017 and 2013,2016 in connection with statutory and regulatory filings or engagements.

Audit RelatedTax Fees. Consists of fees billed for professional services rendered in connection with the Company’s filings on form S-1 Registration Statement.tax consultations.

Tax Fees. Consist of fees billed for the preparation of corporate tax returns

Policy on Pre-Approval by Audit Committee of Services Performed by Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

Our board of directorsAudit Committee pre-approves all services provided by our independent registered public accounting firm. All of the above services and fees were reviewed and approved by our Audit Committee and board of directors before the respective services were rendered.

Our Audit Committee and board of directors has considered the nature and amount of fees billed or expected to be billed by BDO USA, LLP and believes that the provision of services for activities unrelated to the audit was compatible with maintaining BDO USA, LLP’s independence.


40


PART IV

ITEM 15. EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES

Exhibit
Number


Description

(3)

Articles of Incorporation and Bylaws

3.1

Articles of Incorporation (incorporated by reference to an exhibit to our Registration Statement on Form SB-2 filed on January 13, 2005)

3.2

Bylaws (incorporated by reference to an exhibit to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on September 28, 2007)

3.3

Articles of Merger filed with the Secretary of State of Nevada on January 10, 2007 and which is effective January 25, 2007 (incorporated by reference to an exhibit to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on January 25, 2007)

(4)3.4

Instruments defining rightsCertificate of security holders, including indentures

4.1

Specimen Stock Certificate (incorporated by reference to an exhibit to our Registration StatementChange filed with the Secretary of State of Nevada on Form SB-2 filed on January 13, 2005)

4.2

Form of Convertible Loan Agreement (incorporated by reference to an exhibit to our Form 8-K filed on April 3, 2009)

4.3

8% Convertible Loan Agreement dated June 3, 2009 (incorporated by reference to an exhibit to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on June 23, 2009)

4.4

8% Convertible Loan Agreement dated June 19, 2009 (incorporated by reference to an exhibit to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on June 26, 2009)

(10)

Material Contracts

10.1

Agreement between Anavex Life Sciences Corp. and Dr. Alexandre Vamvakides dated January 31, 2007 (incorporated by reference to an exhibit to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on February 7, 2007)

10.2

Form of Stock Option Agreement (incorporated by reference to an exhibit to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on February 22, 2007)

10.3

Shares for Services and Subscription Agreement dated September 11, 2007 between our company and Eurogenet Labs S.A. (incorporated by reference to an exhibit to our Current Report on Form 8- K filed on September 27, 2007)

10.4

2007 Stock Option Plan (incorporated by reference to an exhibit to our Current Report on Form 8- K filed on September 28, 2007)

10.5

Consulting Agreement with Cameron Durrant dated May 20, 2008 (incorporated by reference to an exhibit to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB filed on August 18, 2008

10.6

Form of Convertible Loan Agreement (incorporated by reference to an exhibit to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on April 3, 2009)

10.7

Consulting Agreement with Tariq Arshad dated March 2, 2009 (incorporated by reference to an exhibit to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on April 3, 2009)

10.8

Consulting Agreement with Dr. Mark Smith dated January 13, 2009 (incorporated by reference to an exhibit to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on April 3, 2009)

10.9

Form of Subscription Agreement (incorporated by reference to an exhibit to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on April 3, 2009)

41



Exhibit
Number

Description
10.10

Form of Warrant Certificate (incorporated by reference to an exhibit to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on April 3, 2009)

10.11

Amended Consulting Agreement with Cameron Durrant dated May 14, 2009 (incorporated by reference to an exhibit to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on June 23, 2009)

10.12

CEO Consulting Agreement with Dr. Herve de Kergrohen dated June 12, 2009 (incorporated by reference to an exhibit to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on June 23, 2009)

10.13

Form of Private Placement subscription agreement dated June 15, 2009 (incorporated by reference to an exhibit to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on June 23, 2009)

10.14

Shares for Services Agreement with Andreas Eleuthariadis dated June 10, 2009 (incorporated by reference to an exhibit to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on June 23, 2009)

10.15

Shares for Services Agreement with Vasileios Kourafalos dated June 10, 2009 (incorporated by reference to an exhibit to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on June 23, 2009)

10.16

Shares for Services Agreement with George Kalkanis dated June 10, 2009 (incorporated by reference to an exhibit to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on June 23, 2009)

10.17

Stock Option Agreement with Alexandre Vamvakides dated June 11, 2009 (incorporated by reference to an exhibit to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on June 23, 2009)

10.19

Form of Private Placement Subscription Agreement Convertible Loan (incorporated by reference to an exhibit to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on June 26, 2009)

10.20

Form of Private Placement Subscription Agreement for Units (incorporated by reference to an exhibit to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on June 26, 2009)

10.21

Consultant Services Agreement with NAD Ltd. dated July 1, 2009 (incorporated by reference to an exhibit to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on November 24, 2009)

10.22

Form of Subscription Agreement (incorporated by reference to an exhibit to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on November 24, 2009)

10.23

Form of Warrant Certificate (incorporated by reference to an exhibit to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on August 12, 2009)

10.24

Stock Option Agreement with Alexander Vamvakides dated October 19, 2009 (incorporated by reference to an exhibit to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on November 24, 2009)

10.25

Promissory note issued to Stonehedge Limited on January 1, 2010 (incorporated by reference to an exhibit to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on March 31, 2010)

10.26

Second Amended Consulting Agreement with Dr. Cameron Durrant dated January 2, 2010 (incorporated by reference to an exhibit to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on April 9, 2010)

10.27

Contract Lease Agreement with Euro Genet Labs SA dated February 1, 2010 (incorporated by reference to an exhibit to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on April 9, 2010)

10.28

Form of Subscription Agreement (incorporated by reference to an exhibit to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on April 9, 2010)

10.29

Form of Warrant Certificate (incorporated by reference to an exhibit to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on April 9, 2010)

10.30

Form of Convertible Loan Agreement (incorporated by reference to an exhibit to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on April 9, 2010)

10.31

Form of Subscription Agreement for US subscribers (incorporated by reference to an exhibit to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on July 6, 2010)

42



Exhibit
Number

Description
10.32

Form of Subscription Agreement for non-US subscribers (incorporated by reference to an exhibit to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on July 6, 2010)

10.33

Form of Warrant Certificate for US warrant holders (incorporated by reference to an exhibit to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on July 6, 2010)

10.34

Form of Warrant Certificate for non-US warrant holders (incorporated by reference to an exhibit to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on July 6, 2010)

10.35

Shares for Services Agreement dated July 5, 2010 with Eurogenet Labs SA (incorporated by reference to an exhibit to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on July 9, 2010)

10.36

Form of Warrant Certificate for non-US warrant holders (incorporated by reference to an exhibit to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on July 9, 2010)

10.37

Agreement for Services with Genesis Biopharma Group LLC dated August 10, 2010 (incorporated by reference to an exhibit of our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on August 18, 2010)(portionsof the exhibit have been omitted pursuant to a request for confidential treatment)

10.38

Agreement for Services with ABX-CRO Advanced Pharmaceutical Services dated August 10, 2010 (incorporated by reference to an exhibit of our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on August 18, 2010)(portions of the exhibit have been omitted pursuant to a request for confidentialtreatment)

10.39

Form of Subscription Agreement (US Purchasers) (incorporated by reference to an exhibit to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on September 9, 2010)

10.40

Form of Subscription Agreement (Canadian and Offshore Purchasers) (incorporated by reference to an exhibit to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on September 9, 2010)

10.41

Form of Warrant Certificate (US warrant holders)(incorporated by reference to an exhibit to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on September 9, 2010)

10.42

Form of Warrant Certificate (Canadian and Offshore warrant holders) (incorporated by reference to an exhibit to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on September 9, 2010)

10.43

Consulting Agreement dated August 2, 2010 with Tom Skarpelos (incorporated by reference to an exhibit to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on September 27, 2010)

10.44

Independent Contractor Agreement dated September 1, 2010 with David Tousley (incorporated by reference to an exhibit to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on September 27, 2010)

10.45

Sublease Contract with Genesis Research LLC dated September 15, 2010 (incorporated by reference to an exhibit to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on September 27, 2010)

10.46

Form of Subscription Agreement (US Purchasers) (incorporated by reference to an exhibit to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on November 22, 2010)

10.47

Form of Subscription Agreement (non-US Purchasers) (incorporated by reference to an exhibit to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on November 22, 2010)

10.48

Form of Warrant Certificate (US Warrant Holders) (US Purchasers) (incorporated by reference to an exhibit to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on November 22, 2010)

10.49

Form of Warrant Certificate (non-US Warrant Holders) (US Purchasers) (incorporated by reference to an exhibit to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on November 22, 2010)

10.50

Shares for Service and Subscription Agreement dated November 1, 2010 with Eurogenet Labs SA (incorporated by reference to an exhibit to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on November 22, 2010)

43



Exhibit
Number


Description

10.51

Subscription Agreement with Stonehedge Limited dated November 17, 2010 (incorporated by reference to an exhibit to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on November 22, 2010)

10.52

Form of Subscription Agreement (incorporated by reference to an exhibit to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on November 30, 2010)

10.53

Form of Warrant Certificate Form of Subscription Agreement (incorporated by reference to an exhibit to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on November 30, 2010)

10.54

Shares for Services Agreement Form of Subscription Agreement (incorporated by reference to an exhibit to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on November 30, 2010)

10.55

Form of Subscription Agreement (non-US Purchasers) (incorporated by reference to an exhibit to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on February 7, 2011)

10.56

Form of Warrant Certificate (non-US Warrant Holders) (incorporated by reference to an exhibit to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on February 7, 2011)

10.57

Termination Agreement dated February 2, 2011 with Genesis BioPharma Group, LLC (incorporated by reference to an exhibit to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on February 7, 2011)

10.58

Independent Contractor Agreement with Harvey Lalach dated February 1, 2011 (incorporated by reference to an exhibit to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on February 7, 2011)

10.59

Independent Contractor Agreement with Dr. Angelos Stergiou dated February 1, 2011 (incorporated by reference to an exhibit to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on February 7, 2011)

10.60

Amended and Restated 2007 Stock Option Plan (incorporated by reference to an exhibit to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on February 8, 2011)

10.61

Form of Advisory Board Consulting Agreement (incorporated by reference to an exhibit to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on February 28, 2011)

10.62

Consulting Agreement dated March 30, 2011 with Shackleton Consulting Corp. (incorporated by reference to an exhibit to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on April 13, 2011)

10.63

Form of subscription agreement for convertible debenture (incorporated by reference to an exhibit to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on April 26, 2011)

10.64

Form of subscription agreement for convertible debenture (incorporated by reference to an exhibit to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on May 9, 2011)

10.65

Form of warrant certificate (incorporated by reference to an exhibit to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on May 9, 2011)

10.66

Amended Stock Option Agreement dated September 16, 2011 with Cameron Durrant (incorporated by reference to an exhibit to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on September 21, 2011)

10.67

Consulting Agreement dated effective October 10, 2011, with George Tidmarsh2015 (incorporated by reference to an exhibit to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on October 14, 2011)

6, 2015)

10.68

(4)

Instruments defining rights of security holders, including indentures

4.1Form of subscription agreement for services (US purchaser) (incorporated by reference to our current report on Form 8-K filed on February 10, 2012)

10.69

Form of subscription agreement for units (Offshore purchasers) (incorporated by reference to our current report on Form 8-K filed on February 10, 2012)

10.70

Unsecured Promissory Note dated April 20, 2012 issued to Georgia Georgopoulou (incorporated by reference to our quarterly report on Form 10-Q filed on May 15, 2012)

44



Exhibit
Number


Description

10.71

Form of subscription agreements for convertible debenture and promissory notes (incorporated by reference to an exhibit to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on June 7, 2012)

10.72

Promissory Note dated October 17, 2012 issued to Akira International Limited (incorporated by reference to an exhibit to our Annual Report on Form 10-K filed on December 31, 2012)

10.73

Promissory Note dated November 12, 2012 issued to Akira International Limited (incorporated by reference to an exhibit to our Annual Report on Form 10-K filed on December 31, 2012)

10.74

Form of SPA (incorporated by reference to an exhibit to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on July 8, 2013)

10.75

Form of Exchange Agreement (incorporated by reference to an exhibit to our Current Report on Form 8- K filed on July 8, 2013)

10.76

Form of Warrant (incorporated by reference to an exhibit to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on July 8, 2013)

10.77

Form of Registration Rights Agreement (incorporated by reference to an exhibit to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on July 8, 2013)

10.78

Purchase Agreement, dated as of July 5, 2013, by and between the Company and Lincoln Park Capital Fund, LLC (incorporated by reference to an exhibit to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on July 8, 2013)

10.79

Registration Rights Agreement, dated as of July 5, 2013, by and between the Company and Lincoln Park Capital Fund, LLC (incorporated by reference to an exhibit to our Current Report on Form 8- K filed on July 8, 2013)

10.80

Employment Agreement, dated as of July 5, 2013, by and between the Company and Christopher Missling, PhD (incorporated by reference to an exhibit to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on August 14, 2013)

10.81

2012 Addendum to the Contract for the Transfer of a Patent Invention and Scientific Collaboration dated January 11, 2013 (incorporated by reference to an exhibit to our Annual Report on Form 10- K filed on December 30, 2013)

10.82

Appendix A to the 2012 Addendum to the Contract for the Transfer of a Patent Invention and Scientific Collaboration dated January 11, 2013 (incorporated by reference to an exhibit to our Annual Report on Form 10-K filed on December 30, 2013)

10.83

Form of Amendment No. 1 to Common Stock Securities Purchase Warrant, entered into December 21, 2013 Agreement, dated March 13, 2014, by and among the Company and the Purchasers named thereinSenior Convertible Debenture (incorporated by reference to an exhibit to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on March 19, 2014)

10.84

4.2

Form of Series A/B Warrant (incorporated by reference to an exhibit to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on March 19, 2014)

4.3Form of Series A Common Stock Purchase Warrant (incorporated by reference to an exhibit to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on October 23, 2014)
4.4Form of Series B Common Stock Purchase Warrant (incorporated by reference to an exhibit to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on October 23, 2014)
(10)Material Contracts
10.1Form of Registration Rights Agreement, dated March 13, 2014, by and among the Company and the parties identified therein (incorporated by reference to an exhibit to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on March 19, 2014)

10.85

10.2

Form of Senior Convertible Debenture2015 Omnibus Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to an exhibit to our CurrentAnnual Report on Form 8-K10-K filed on March 19, 2014)

December 29, 2015)

10.86

10.3

Form of Series A/B Warrant (incorporated by reference to an exhibit to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on March 19, 2014)

10.87

Form of Amendment No. 1 to Registration Rights Agreement (incorporated by reference to an exhibit to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on August 25, 2014

45



Exhibit
Number

Description
10.88

Securities Purchase Agreement, dated as of October 22, 2014,21, 2015, by and between the Company and Lincoln Park Capital Fund, LLC (incorporated by reference to an exhibit to our Current Report on Form 8- K8-K filed on October 23, 2014)

26, 2015)
10.8910.4

FormRegistration Rights Agreement, dated as of Series A Common Stock Purchase WarrantOctober 21, 2015, by and between the Company and Lincoln Park Capital Fund, LLC (incorporated by reference to an exhibit to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on October 23, 2014)

26, 2015)
10.9010.5

FormFirst Amendment to Employment Agreement, dated as of Series B Common Stock Purchase WarrantJuly 5, 2016, by and between the Company and Christopher Missling, PhD (incorporated by reference to an exhibit to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on October 23, 2014)

July 7, 2016)
(14)10.6

CodeAmended and Restated First Amendment to Employment Agreement, dated as of Ethics

14.1

Code of ConductJuly 18, 2016, by and between the Company and Christopher Missling, PhD (incorporated by reference to an exhibit to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on July 22, 2016)

10.7*Amended and Restated Employment Agreement by and between the Company and with Sandra Boenisch


Exhibit
Number

Description
14Code of Ethics
14.1Code of Ethics Adopted on September 28, 2007)

13, 2016 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 14.1 to our Annual Report on Form 10-K filed on December 14, 2016)
(21)

Subsidiaries

21.121.1*

 Anavex Life Sciences (France) SA, incorporated underSubsidiaries of the laws of France

Registrant
21.2(23)

 Anavex Australia Pty Limited, a company incorporated under the lawsConsent

23.1*Consent of Australia

Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
(31)

Section 302 Certifications

31.1*

Section 302 Certification of Christopher Missling, PhD.

31.2*Section 302 Certification of Sandra Boenisch
(32)

Section 906 Certifications

32.1*

Section 906 Certification of Christopher Missling, PhD.PhD and Sandra Boenisch

(99)

Additional Exhibits

99.1

Insider Trading Policy Adopted August 27, 20109, 2017

99.2Corporate Investment Policy Adopted May 4, 2017 (incorporated by reference to an exhibit 99.1 to our CurrentQuarterly Report on Form 8-K10-Q filed on September 27, 2010)

May 10, 2017)
(101)

XBRL

101.INS*

XBRL INSTANCE DOCUMENT

101.SCH*

XBRL TAXONOMY EXTENSION SCHEMA

101.CAL*

XBRL TAXONOMY EXTENSION CALCULATION LINKBASE

101.DEF*

XBRL TAXONOMY EXTENSION DEFINITION LINKBASE

101.LAB*

XBRL TAXONOMY EXTENSION LABEL LINKBASE

101.PRE*

XBRL TAXONOMY EXTENSION PRESENTATION LINKBASE

* Filed herewith.

46



SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

Date: December 29, 201411, 2017ANAVEX LIFE SCIENCES CORP.

 By:

/s/ Christopher Missling, PhD

 Name:Christopher Missling, PhD
 Title:Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
  Title:

Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer, Principal

Financial Officer, Principal Accounting
Officer)

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

SignaturesTitle(s)Date
     
/s/Christopher Missling

Signatures

Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer (Principal Executive Officer, Principal Financial Officer, Principal Accounting Officer)

Title(s)

December 29, 2014

Date

Christopher Missling
     

/s/ Christopher Missling, PhD

December 11, 2017
Christopher Missling, PhDChief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)

/s/ Sandra Boenisch

December 11, 2017
Sandra Boenisch, CPA, CGAPrincipal Financial Officer and Treasurer (Principal Accounting Officer)

/s/ Athanasios Skarpelos

DirectorDecember 29, 201411, 2017
Athanasios SkarpelosDirector

/s/ Bernd Metzner, PhD

December 11, 2017
Bernd Metzner, PhDDirector

/s/ Elliot Favus, MD

December 11, 2017
Elliot Favus, MDDirector

/s/ Steffen Thomas, PhD

December 11, 2017
Steffen Thomas, PhDDirector

/s/ Peter Donhauser, D.O.

December 11, 2017
Peter Donhauser, D.O.Director
     
/s/Bernd MetznerDirectorDecember 29, 2014
Bernd Metzner
     
/s/Elliot FavusDirectorDecember 29, 2014
Elliot Favus

41

47