UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K

(Mark One)

[X] ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

xANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the fiscal year ended August 31, 2019

or

¨

For the fiscal year endedAugust 31, 2017

[   ] TRANSITION REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from [    ] to [    ]

Commission file number000-52138

LEXARIA BIOSCIENCE CORP.

LEXARIA BIOSCIENCE CORP.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Nevada

20-2000871

(

State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)organization

(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

156 Valleyview Rd,

#100 – 740 McCurdy Road, Kelowna BC Canada

V1X 3M42P7

(Address of principal executive offices)

(Zip Code)

Registrant's telephone number, including area code:250-765-6424

Registrant’s Telephone number, including area code: 250-765-6424

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

Title of Each Class

Name of Each Exchange On Which Registered

N/A

N/A

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g)12(b) of the Act:

Common Stock, Par Value $0.001
(Title of class)

Title of Class

Trading Symbol(s)

Name of each exchange on which registered

Common Stock, Par Value $0.001

LXRP

LXX

OTCQX

CSE

Indicate by check mark if the registrantregistered is a well-known seasonedseasonal issuer, as defined in Rule 405 the Securities Act.
Act Yes [   ]      ¨ No [X]x

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act
Yes [   ]      ¨ No [X]x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the

1


Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports) and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the last 90 days.
Yes [X]     x No [   ]¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically, and posted on its corporate Website, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-K (§229.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).
Yes [X]       x No [   ]¨

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (§229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. [   ]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definition of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filer [   ]

¨

Accelerated filer                   [   ]

x

Non-accelerated filer   [   ]

¨

Smaller reporting company [X]

x

Emerging growth company [   ]

¨

If an emerging growth company, indicate by a check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. [   ]Act ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
Yes [   ]       ¨ No [X]x

The aggregate market value of Common Stock held by non-affiliates of the Registrant on February 28, 20172019 was $12,520,308$83,889,033 based on the average of the high and low bid and asked price of the Registrant’s shares of common stock on the OTC Bulletin BoardOTCQX or $0.545$1.42 on February 28, 2017. For purposes of this computation, all executive officers and directors have been deemed to be affiliates. Such determination should not be deemed to be an admission that such executive officers and directors are, in fact, affiliates of the Registrant.2019.

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the registrant’s classes of common stock as of the latest practicable date.

69,435,19878,787,134 common shares as of November 22, 20175, 2019

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

None.

2


TABLE OF CONTENTS

Item 1.

Business4
 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Item 1A.1.

Risk FactorsBusiness

20

3

Item 1A.

Risk Factors

24

Item 1B.

Unresolved Staff Comments

29

33

Item 2.

Properties

33

Item 2.3.

PropertiesLegal Proceedings

29

33

Item 3.

Legal Proceedings30
Item 4.

Mine Safety Disclosures

30

33

Item 5.

Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases ofEquity Securities

30

34

Item 6.

Selected Financial Data

33

36

Item 7.

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

34

37

Item 7A.

Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

41

45

Item 8.

Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

41

45

Item 9.

Changes in and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure

65

69

Item 9A.

Controls and Procedures

66

69

Item 9B.

Other Information

70

Item 9B.

Other Information67
Item 10.

Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance

67

71

Item 11.

Executive Compensation

74

Item 11.

Executive Compensation71
Item 12.

Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related StockholderMatters

75

77

Item 13.

Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence

76

78

Item 14.

Principal Accounting Fees and Services

77

78

Item 15.

Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules

78

80

3


Page 2 of 83

PART I1

Item 1. Business

Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements

This annual report contains forward-looking statements as that term is defined in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Any statements contained herein that are not statements of historical fact may be forward-looking statements. These statements relate to future events or our future financial performance. Any forward-looking statements are based on our present beliefs and assumptions as well as the information currently available to us. In some cases, you can identify forward-looking statements by terminology such as “may”, “will”, “should”, “could”, “targets”, “goal”, “expects”, “plans”, “anticipates”, “believes”, “estimates”, “predicts”, “potential” or “continue” or the negative of these terms or other comparable terminology. These statements are only predictions and involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors, including the risks in the section entitled “Risk Factors” set forth in Item 1(A) in this report on Form 10-K, that may cause our or our industry’s actual results, levels of activity, performance or achievements to be materially different from any future results, levels of activity, performance or achievements expressed or implied by these forward-looking statements.

Although we believe that the expectations reflected in the forward-looking statements are reasonable, we cannot guarantee future results, levels of activity, performance or achievements. ExceptWe caution you not to place undue reliance on any forward-looking statements as required by applicable law, including the securities lawsthey speak only as of the United States,date on which such statements were made, and we do not intendundertake no obligation to update any forward-looking statement or to reflect the occurrence of an unanticipated event. New factors may emerge and it is not possible to predict all factors that may affect our business and prospects. Further, management cannot assess the impact of each factor on the business or the extent to which any factor, or combination of factors, may cause actual results to differ materially from those contained in any forward-looking statements to conform these statements to actual results.statements.

Lexaria’s

Our audited annual consolidated financial statements are stated in United States Dollars (US$) and are prepared in accordance with United States Generally Accepted Accounting Principles.Principles (US GAAP). The following discussion should be read in conjunction with our financial statements and the related notes that appear elsewhere in this report.

In this annual report, unless otherwise specified, all dollar amounts are expressed in United States dollars. All references to “C$” or “CDN$” refer to Canadian dollars and all references to “common shares” and “shares” refer to the common shares in our common stock. References to “CAD$” refers to Canadian dollars.capital stock, unless otherwise indicated.

As used in this currentquarterly report, the terms “Lexaria” “we”, “us”, “our” and “Company” mean Company and/or our subsidiaries, unless otherwise indicated, the terms "we", "us", "our" and "our company" mean Lexaria Bioscience Corp., our wholly owned subsidiary, Lexaria CanPharm Corp., a Canadian corporation, our 51% owned (100% as of October 2017) subsidiary PoViva Tea, LLC (“PoViva"), an entity incorporated in the state of Nevada, and our 50% ownership of Ambarii Trade Corporation (“Ambarii”), a Canadian corporation, unless otherwise stated.indicated.

General and Historical Overview of Our Business

The Company was formed on December 9, 2004 under the laws of the State of Nevada as an independent oil and gas company engaged in the exploration, development and acquisition of oil and gas properties in the United States and Canada. In March of 2014, the Company began its entry into the bioscience and alternative health and wellness business and discontinued its involvement in the oil and gas business in November 2014. In May 2016, the Company also commenced out-licensing its patented DehydraTECH™ technology (the “Technology”) for improved delivery of bioactive compounds that promotes healthy ingestion methods, lower overall dosing and higher effectiveness in active molecule delivery. The Company has its office in Kelowna, BC, Canada.

Effective at the opening of trading on October 28, 2009, our shares of common stock began trading on the Canadian Securities Exchange (formerly, Canadian National Stock Exchange) under the trading symbol “LXX”.

Our common stock is quoted on the OTCQBOTCQX under the symbol "LXRP"“LXRP” and on the Canadian Securities Exchange under the symbol “LXX”.

Page 3 of 83
Table of Contents

In 2014, the Company submitted an applicationchanged its business direction to enter into the hemp oil-based food supplement industry in the US and the legal medical marijuana businessindustry in Canada and also launchedvia a hemp oil-based food supplement company49% interest in the USA.

The Company entered into a joint venture agreement with Enertopia Corp for a prospective medical marijuana business under the Canadian Marijuana for Medical Purposes Regulations (“MMPR”) for aarrangement. The 49% net ownership interest in the business (Enertopia 51%) utilizing an identified location in Burlington, Ontario. On September 15th, 2017, the Company issued 625,000 shares of its common stock from the exercise of warrants previously granted for proceeds of $93,750. All warrants were exercised by third parties who are neither officers nor directors of the Company.

4


Onwas subsequently sold on June 26, 2015 for $4,900 by the Company entered into a definitive agreement with Enertopia Corp. and Shaxon Enterprises Ltd. to sellfocus on its 49% interest in the Burlington Joint Venture and the MMPR application number 10MMPR0610. Pursuant to the agreement, the joint venture received a non-refundable $10,000 deposit and is entitled to receive up to $1,500,000 in milestone payments upon the Burlington facility becoming licensed under the MMPR. All payments made pursuant to the agreement would be divided 51% to Enertopia Corp. and 49% to Lexaria Bioscience. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Company can neither guarantee nor provide a meaningful time estimate regarding the grant of a production license for the Burlington facility.food sciences activities.

The Company’s food sciences activities include the development of our proprietary nutrient infusion technologies for the production of superfoods,functional foods, and the production of enhanced food products under our two consumer product brands, ViPova™, Lexaria Energy™, TurboCBD™ and Lexaria Energy™ChrgD+TM. The Company’s patented lipid nutrient infusion DehydraTECH technology DehydraTECHTM is believed to improve taste, rapidity and delivery of bioactive compounds that include cannabinoids, vitamins, NSAIDs NicotineNon-Steroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs (NSAIDs), nicotine and other molecules compared to what is possible without lipophilic enhancement technology. This can allow for lower overall dosing requirements and/or higher effectiveness in active molecule delivery. Lexaria has caused to be filed several patent pending applications with the US Patent Office, and also internationally under the Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT). On October 26, 2016, the USPTO issued U.S. Patent No. 9,474,725 (granted June 15 2017 in Australia No. 2015274698), Cannabinoid Infused Food and Beverage Compositions and Methods of Use Thereof, pertaining to Lexaria’s method of improving bioavailability and taste of certain cannabinoid lipophilic active agents in food products. Lexaria hopes to reduce other common but less healthy ingestion methods, such as smoking, as it embraces the benefits of its technology for public health.

As at August 31, 2017, we only had one reportable segment, being the development and usage, including licensing of our proprietary nutrient infusion technology.

We maintain our registered agent'sagent’s office and our U.S. business office at Nevada Agency and Transfer Company, 50 West Liberty, Suite 880, Reno, Nevada 89501. Our telephone number is (755) 322-0626.

The address of our principal executive office is 156 Valleyview Rd,Unit 100–740 McCurdy Road, Kelowna BC Canada V1X3M4.V1X 2P7. We have administrative functions located in Vancouver,Phoenix, Arizona. Our main corporate website is located at www.lexariabioscience.com.

Due to the implementation of British Columbia Instrument 51-509 on September 30, 2008, by the British Columbia Securities Commission, we have been deemed to be a British Columbia based reporting issuer. As such, we are required to file certain information and Phoenix, Arizona.documents at www.sedar.com.

Available Information

We file annual, quarterly and current reports, proxy statements and other information with the Commission. These filings are available to the public on the Internet at the Commission's website at http://www.sec.gov.

Our Internet address is http://www.lexariabioscience.com/ (this website address is not intended to function as a hyperlink and the information contained on our website is not intended to be a part of this Report).

We make available free of charge on http://www.lexariabioscience.com/investors/regulatory-filings/ our annual, quarterly and current reports, and amendments to those reports, as soon as reasonably practical after we electronically file such material with, or furnish it to, the Commission. We may from time to time provide important disclosures to investors by posting them in the Investor Relations section of our website, as allowed by the Commission's rules. The information on the website listed above is not and should not be considered part of this Report and is intended to be an inactive textual reference only.

Our Current Business

Our company’s business plan is currently focused on the development of strategic partnerships with licensees for our patented technologyTechnology in exchange for up front and/or staged licensing fees over time. Secondarily and more generally, we continue to investigate national and international opportunities for development and distribution of the Company’s enhanced functional food and supplement product offerings; to investigate expansions and additions to our intellectual property portfolio; and, to search for additional opportunities in alternative health sectors. This includes the acquisition or development of intellectual property if and when we believe it is advisable to do so. We announced issuance of our first

Our current patent by the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) on October 26, 2016 and have received a Notice of Acceptance from the Australian Patent Office with relatedportfolio includes patent issuance date June 15 2017 No. 2015274698. We announced on November 2, 2017 a new Notice of Allowance from the USPTO that included the delivery of additional molecules such as psychoactive cannabinoids, vitamins, non-steroidal anti-inflammatories, and nicotine all utilizing our DehydraTECHTM delivery technology. We are seeking additional patent protection for what we believe to be a unique process for the nutritional delivery of certain molecules such as cannabinoids, Nicotine, Non-Steroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs (NSAIDs), and Vitamins. To achieve sustainable and profitable growth, our company intends to control the timing and costs of our projects wherever possible.

During the past fiscal year the Company experienced the following significant corporate developments:

On September 8th, 2016, the Company announced signing new definitive technology licensing and private label agreements. Lexaria will earn a pre-defined premium to costs on all raw ingredient sourcing and manufacturing, and will further earn a pre-defined royalty rate on all gross product sales revenues earned by Timeless Herbal Care Limited. The agreement is for an initial term of 5 years. No business activity has occurred as yet under this agreement.

On October 11, 2016, in exchange of business advisory services including marketing strategies and assistance in preparing presentation materials, dissemination of information and other business and capital advisory services, the Company granted 250,000 stock options to a consultant with a strike price of $0.14 per share, and expiry term of two years. The Company also paid a compensation of CAD$5,000 to the consultant. This contract was terminated December 12, 2016.

5


On October 11, 2016, pursuant to its agreement with Docherty Management Ltd., the Company issued 252,000 restricted common shares and cash compensation of $6,240.

On October 11, 2016, the Company issued 750,000 warrants with an exercise price of $0.14 per share and valid for five years, in return for consulting services provided in August, September, and October.

On October 11, 2016, the Company reached an agreement with a director to settle the outstanding amount pursuant to a advisory agreement with him, through issuance of common shares of the Company. To settle the outstanding amount of $16,000 for four months to October 31, 2016, the Company issued 114,286 shares of its common stock at a value of $0.14 per share.

On October 11, 2016, the Company retained a consultant to provide market maintenance service for the Company in compliance with regulatory guidelines. The consultant trades shares of the Company on the Canadian Securities Exchange for purposes of maintaining a reasonable market and improving the liquidity of Lexaria’s shares.

On October 16, 2016, the Company received $12,500 from exercise of 55,000 stock options.

On October 26, 2016, the Company announced the USPTO issued U.S. Patent No. 9,474,725, Cannabinoidfamily grants relating to: Infused Food and Beverage Compositions and Methods of Use Thereof, pertaining to Lexaria’s method of improving bioavailability and taste, and the use of DehydraTECH technology as a delivery platform for a wide variety of Active Pharmaceutical Ingredients (“APIs”) encompassing all cannabinoids including tetrahydrocannabinol (“THC”); fat soluble vitamins; Non-Steroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs (“NSAIDs”) pain medications; and nicotine.

Lexaria hopes to reduce other common but less healthy administration methods, such as smoking, as it embraces the benefits of its technology for public health. The Company is aggressively pursuing patent protection in national jurisdictions around the world. The Company currently has more than 55 patent applications pending worldwide and, due to the complexity of pursuing patent protection, the quantity of patent applications will vary continuously as each application advances or stalls. Lexaria is also filing new patent applications for novel new discoveries that arise from the Company’s R&D programs and, due to the inherent unpredictability of scientific discovery, it is not possible to predict if or how often such new applications might be filed.

Page 4 of 83
Table of Contents

During the past fiscal year the Company experienced the following significant corporate developments:

On September 7, 2018, the Company announced additions to its patent portfolio with three new Australian patents granted to Lexaria by the Australian Patent Office. The three Australian patents are projected to expire on June 10, 2035.

The USPTO also issued two new Notices of Allowance for pending patent applications and the Company announced the grants on October 16, 2018. The two new patents are related to certain cannabinoid lipophilic active agentsinfused beverage compositions utilizing Lexaria’s proprietary DehydraTECH process. Newly granted patent numbers US 10,103,225 B2 and US 10,084,044 B2 provide protection for compositions as well as methods for making the compositions, each of which include the use of both non-psychoactive cannabinoids such as cannabidiol (“CBD”) and also psychoactive cannabinoids such as THC. The Company holds fourteen issued patents within its first patent family, “Food and Beverage Compositions Infused With Lipophilic Active Agents and Methods of Use Thereof”, one in food products.the second patent family “Methods for Formulating Orally Ingestible Compositions Comprising Lipophilic Active Agents”, and one in the third patent family “Stable Ready-to-Drink Beverage Compositions Comprising Lipophilic Active Agents” that significantly strengthen Lexaria’s intellectual property claims in the US and Australia. Of note, issuance of these patents in the second and third patent families represents the first time the Company has been granted claims for use of its technology in connection with the treatment of specific diseases and medical conditions affecting humans, which the Company believes will prove to be of significance to the pharmaceutical industry sector as it further develops and grows. We continue to pursue claims in corresponding pending applications around the world.

On September 7, 2018, the Company announced the filing of a new strategic patent application. The new provisional patent application is entitled “Lipophilic Active Agent Infused Tobacco Leaves and/or Tobacco Materials and Methods of Use Thereof”. This application represents Lexaria’s tenth patent family and expands the applicability of the already-patented DehydraTECH process to impart benefits to tobacco leaves that may be utilized to deliver compounds that may or may not include nicotine.

On October 27, 2016,10, 2018, the Company received approval to offer existing warrant holders an incentive to exercise warrants early. Forannounced completed the creation of four wholly-owned subsidiary companies. This new corporate structure more suitably reflects the distinct customer bases and business applications for each exercise, in addition to the shares, the warrant holders were offered an additional warrant with identical terms. During the period ended February 28, 2017, a total of 3,245,000 warrants were exercised at a weighted average price of $0.2273 andsubsidiary, thereby allowing the Company issued 3,245,000 common sharesto focus its future research and 3,245,000 warrants with a weighted average exercise price of $0.2273consider financing structures and industry partnerships specifically optimized to buy one additional common share of the Company, expiring May 14, 2017. Total proceeds raised from such incentive amounted to $737,500.each.

·Lexaria CanPharm ULC, a Canadian company focused on providing DehydraTECH technology and other enhancements to the global cannabis industry.

·Lexaria Nicotine LLC, a US company with a global license to provide DehydraTECH technology to the global nicotine and tobacco industries.

·Lexaria Hemp Corp., a US company globally licensed to provide DehydraTECH to the rapidly growing hemp-based foods and supplements industries.

·Lexaria Pharmaceutical Corp., a US company globally empowered to license DehydraTECH to the large and diverse pharmaceutical sectors.

On November 1, 2016,13, 2018, the Company issued 56,250 sharesannounced the launch of its common stockChrgD+, a water-soluble, ready-mix hemp supplement powder packet formulation designed to be added to any drink. Lexaria engaged Cultivating Wellness Inc., a California-based brand development and distribution company, to create the ChrgD+ premium brand. Cultivating Wellness’ distribution network reaches tens of thousands of retail buyers in settlementc-stores, grocery chains, specialty retail, and national accounts. We subsequently launched our retail e-commerce website for public consumers in June of $9,000, recognized within accounts payable and accrued liabilities as at August 31, 2016.2019.

On November 1, 2016,26, 2018, the Company received $37,505 from exerciseannounced it submitted a research application under Health Canada’s Cannabis Tracking and Licensing System for the operation of 165,000 share purchase warrants.a Kelowna-based R&D laboratory within Lexaria’s new head office. The laboratory’s creation enhances Lexaria’s ability to formulate for analytical purposes, various products that may contain cannabinoids or other controlled substances. Experimental work on nicotine formulations, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, vitamins and other bioactive compounds of interest began soon after completion of lab construction with work on cannabinoid related formulations occurring after receipt of Lexaria’s research license. Bringing formulation work in-house enables the Company to expand its work schedules while reducing costs and development timelines.

Page 5 of 83
Table of Contents

On November 1, 2016,January 15, 2019, the Company issued 500,000 warrantsannounced that its wholly-owned subsidiary Lexaria Nicotine LLC (“Lexaria Nicotine”) and Altria Ventures Inc., an indirect wholly-owned subsidiary of Altria Group, Inc. (“Altria”), executed definitive agreements to a consultant. Each warrant is valid for purchase of one new common share of the Company at a price of $0.31 per share with and expiration date of May 31, 2017.

On November 16, 2016, the Company received $50,003 from exercise of 220,000 share purchase warrants.

On November 21, 2016, the Company received $50,000 from exercise of 220,000 share purchase warrants.

On November 22, 2016, the Company signed a Memorandum of Understanding with NeutriSci International Inc. (“NeutriSci”) for forming a 50/50 joint venture to develop, produce, and sell a line of healthy edible cannabinoidpursue innovation in oral, reduced risk nicotine consumer products using Lexaria’s patented DehydraTECH technology. Altria is funding a milestone-based research & development program (“R&D Program”) in exchange for a minority equity interest in Lexaria Nicotine and certain DehydraTECH license rights. Altria will provide initial funding of $1 million, with the option for additional funding of up to $12 million total through multiple phased private financings. Altria was granted a license to use Lexaria Bioscience’s DehydraTECH technology for oral nicotine delivery forms on an exclusive basis in the United States and a non-exclusive basis elsewhere globally. Altria will pay Lexaria Nicotine a royalty on revenue generated from the sale of all nicotine products containing DehydraTECH, until such time it may acquire 100% ownership in Lexaria Nicotine. Altria will initially have the right to appoint one of the seven managers of Lexaria Nicotine and, through the additional phased investments, may have the right to appoint up to three of the seven managers. Altria has the option to acquire 100% ownership interest in Lexaria Nicotine commensurate with then-current fair market value. Altria gained no rights of ownership to Lexaria Bioscience and has no rights of board of director representation on Lexaria Bioscience

On February 21, 2019, the Company announced additional findings upon completion of further data analyses from its 2018 randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blinded European human clinical study that evaluated TurboCBD, the Company’s proprietary, DehydraTECH powered, CBD fortified hemp-oil capsule. A single 90mg dose of TurboCBD provided evidence of lower blood pressure; higher blood flow to the brain; faster delivery onset of CBD into the bloodstream; and, larger quantities of CBD within the blood compared to a single 90mg dose of generic CBD.

Key metabolic and hemodynamic performance findings linked to bioavailability enhancements were revealed in the study, which compared a 90 mg dose of Lexaria’s TurboCBD to a 90 mg dose without Lexaria’s DehydraTECH technology (the “positive control”) as well as a placebo, as follows:

·Analysis of mean arterial blood pressure (MAP) at peak blood levels of CBD achieved with Lexaria’s TurboCBD demonstrated a significant reduction in MAP compared to placebo (95% CI; p=0.027). This finding was not observed with the dose-matched positive control formulation for which there was no significant decrease in MAP compared to placebo (95% CI; p=0.625);

·Cerebral perfusion was also analysed by an index of conductance in the middle cerebral artery (MCA). The findings revealed that Lexaria’s TurboCBD caused the greatest increase in MCA conductance relative to both the positive control formulation and placebo (95% CI; p=0.017 and P=0.002 respectively);

Finally, over the six-hour study, analysis of the total area under the curve (AUC) demonstrated that Lexaria’s TurboCBD resulted in a notable trend for higher levels of CBD in the bloodstream overall than the positive control formulation with total AUC of 10,865 ± 6,322 observed with Lexaria’s formulation compared to 7,115 ± 2,978 observed with the positive control (95% CI; p=0.096). Furthermore, when normalized to body mass, the AUC at the peak CBD concentration was markedly and significantly (95% CI; p=0.02) higher with the TurboCBD 90 mg dose compared to the 90 mg dose positive control formulation.

On March 20, 2019, the Company announced an in vivo research program to test Lexaria designed nanotech enhancements comprised of eleven separate animal studies. Lexaria also announced that, effective March 15, 2019, it terminated the definitive license agreement entered into between Lexaria CanPharm ULC and NeutriSci proprietary pterostilbene tablet formulaInternational Inc. that was originally announced on February 26, 2018.

On April 24, 2019, the Company announced that it entered a definitive 5-year agreement, via its subsidiary Lexaria Canpharm ULC, to provide Lexaria’s patented DehydraTECH technology to a private California-based company for its utilization in certain CBD-based beverages to be produced and sold in California and Nevada that may include any combination of ready-to-drink beverages such as non-alcoholic beers, wines and spirits; cold or hot coffee or teas, sports drinks and more.

On May 7, 2019, the Company announced that it entered a definitive 5-year agreement, via its subsidiary Lexaria Hemp Corp., to provide Lexaria’s patented DehydraTECH technology to a private Nevada-based company for its utilization in certain CBD-based beverages to be produced and sold across the USA that may include any combination of ready-to-drink beverages such as non-alcoholic beers, wines and spirits; cold or hot coffee or teas, sports drinks and more.

Page 6 of 83
Table of Contents

On May 15, 2019, the Company released initial results from its research program announced March 2019 demonstrating measurable quantities of cannabidiol into blood in as little as 2 minutes. In each arm of the Lexaria animal studies, 10 male Sprague-Dawley rats were administered CBD at 25mg per kg of bodyweight. Delivery of CBD into the bloodstream was monitored over a 60-minute duration. In the first animal study results, Lexaria compared its standard DehydraTECH formulation that combines cannabinoids with long-chain fatty acids (“LCFA”) using Lexaria’s patented dehydration processing technique to a concentration-matched formulation utilizing coconut oil which is a commonly used medium chain triglyceride (“MCT”) oil in the cannabis edibles industry.

·At 2 minutes DehydraTECH’s LCFA formulation delivered measurable CBD in blood, compared to no measurable CBD in blood until 6 minutes and onwards for the MCT oil formulation.

·At 15 minutes DehydraTECH’s LCFA formulation achieved a CBD blood concentration level that was 475% more than the MCT oil formulation; and, the DehydraTECH LCFA formulation CBD blood levels reached at 15 minutes were greater than the CBD blood levels reached by the MCT oil formulation at any time point during the 60-minute evaluation.

·At 60 minutes DehydraTECH’s LCFA formulation achieved a CBD blood concentration level of 319% more than the MCT oil formulation.

·Over the entire 60-minute study, the animals that received the standard DehydraTECH LCFA formulation achieved an average maximum CBD blood concentration level that was 334% more than the average maximum blood concentration level of the animals that received the MCT oil formulation (p<0.0021).

·Over the entire 60-minute study, the area under the curve (AUC) (total quantity of CBD delivered) for the Lexaria DehydraTECH LCFA formulation was 389% more than the MCT oil formulation (p<0.0011).

Lexaria also tested for brain tissue concentrations to quantify 8-hour CBD delivery from the DehydraTECH-enabled LCFA formulation compared to the MCT oil formulation and DehydraTECH’s LCFA formulation outperformed the MCT oil formulation by 246%.

On May 21, 2019, the Company announced a major expansion in operations by Nuka Enterprises LLC, (“Nuka”) maker of “1906” brand edibles over the next two years into Illinois, Ohio, Massachusetts, Michigan and other states. The comprehensive semi-exclusive agreement provides Nuka and 1906 with competitive technological advantages until 2028. A second license provides Nuka and 1906 with the immediate ability to utilize DehydraTECH technology for CBD across the US marketplace.

On May 28, 2019, the Company released additional results from its research program wherein animal testing proved that combining Lexaria’s DehydraTECH delivery technology with generic nanotech techniques delivers 1,137% more cannabidiol into animal brain tissue following oral ingestion than certain existing industry formulations. Lexaria combined its DehydraTECH delivery technology with a standard form of nanotechnology and analyzed subsequent delivery into brain tissue following oral ingestion. In each arm of the Lexaria animal studies, 10 male Sprague-Dawley rats were orally administered CBD at the rate of 25mg per kg of bodyweight. Delivery of CBD into the brain was reported 8 hours after dosing.

·The Lexaria DehydraTECH LCFA formulation without nanotech achieved an average brain tissue accumulation level that was 246% higher than the average for those animals that received the MCT oil formulation (p=0.0013).

·The Lexaria DehydraTECH LCFA formulation with nanotech achieved an average brain tissue accumulation level that was 1,137% higher than the average for those animals that received the MCT oil formulation (p=0.0178).

On June 4, 2019 the Company announced additional results from the March 20, 2019 announced animal studies demonstrating improved performance characteristics resulting in new patent applications. This arm of the study tested DehydraTECH delivery technology with compounds postulated to behave in a synergistic fashion for enhancement of gastro-intestinal absorption separate and distinct from nanotech techniques.

On July 10, 2019, the Company announced that it entered a definitive 5-year agreement, via its subsidiary Lexaria Hemp Corp, to provide Lexaria’s patented DehydraTECH technology to Nic’s Beverages Ltd for use in CBD-based beverages to be produced and sold throughout the United States.

On July 11, 2019, the Company announced that it entered a definitive 5-year agreement, via its subsidiary Lexaria Hemp Corp., to provide Lexaria’s patented DehydraTECH technology to Universal Hemp LLC, a B2B manufacturing company of hemp-derived bulk ingredients to the nutraceutical and consumer packaged goods industries to be produced and sold across the USA immediately, and in Canada when regulations permit. Agreed to minimum payments over the life of the 5-year agreement are $3,750,000.

Page 7 of 83
Table of Contents

On July 24, 2019, the Company announced that it entered a 10-year Joint Manufacturing Partnership (JMP) with Hill Street Beverages Company Inc. to produce commercial products including processed THC cannabis and/or CBD hemp powder including among other categories; tablets, capsules, or packets for sale in Canada and for export where permitted. The JMP will also produce similar powders as a bulk ingredient for manufacturing processes for sale to other licensed producers seeking to use DehydraTECH to create their own products for sale within Canada. Profits from this business unit will be shared equally between Hill Street and Lexaria. In addition to the JMP, Hill Street acquired two global semi-exclusive licenses (with minor exceptions) to utilize Lexaria’s DehydraTECH THC beverage infusion technology around the world, valid for 10 years. Under the terms of the agreements, Hill Street will pay an annual licensing fee and up to an additional $1,800,000 to Lexaria by issuing $800,000 in common shares of Hill Street to Lexaria initially, and Lexaria will issue $250,000 in restricted common shares to Hill Street. In addition, Hill Street will issue up to an additional $500,000 in shares of Hill Street when they enter each of the first two international distribution network. The joint venture expectsmarkets subject to commercialize any newly created cannabinoid edible products through distribution programsTSXV and existing strategic partners. Product developmentCSE approval, as applicable. Pursuant to the terms of the JMP agreements, Lexaria will issue an aggregate $250,000 in restricted common shares to Hill Street. Closing of the Hill Street / Lexaria agreements is underwaysubject to normal regulatory approvals and a joint venture subsidiarythe closing of the Hill Street / OneLeaf transaction announced by Hill Street. Subsequent to August 31, 2019, Hill Street has been formed.unable to close its transaction with OneLeaf and is currently searching for an alternate location from which to base the Hill Street / Lexaria agreements, thus there is a possibility that this transaction may not close as expected.

On November 29, 2016,August 8, 2019, the Company announced the entry of a letter of intent for the licensingsuccessful completion of its proprietary absorption and palatability enhancing technology to Hempco Food and Fiber Inc.Master Collaborative Research Agreement (“Hempco”). It was expected that the letter of intent would advance into a definitive agreement, however Hempco has since been majority acquired by another firm and our letter of intent has expired although casual business discussions remain.

6


On December 1, 2016, the Company amended its agreement with CAB for a revised consulting fee of $12,000 per month. The term of the amended agreement is two years but can be terminated by either party by providing two months notice.

On December 19, 2016, the Company filed to internationally expand its U.S patent number 9474725, granted on October 26, 2016. National filing patent applications in Canada, Australia, Japan, China, India and all 37 countries belonging to the European Patent Convention were filed. All of these filings follow the Company’s initial international Patent Cooperation Treaty patent application.

On December 22, 2016, the Company extended the services of Frontier Merchant Capital Group (“Frontier”R&D Program”) for a period of three months, for a total fee of CAD$25,000. Frontier will assist the Company by increasing market awareness utilizing a number of financial market communication initiatives including media outreach, facilitating in-person introduction for the Company with institutional and retail brokers and investors in cities across Canada and the U.S., and more.

On January 10, 2017, the Company issued 500,000 incentive warrants to an arm’s length party in exchange for corporate development services. The exercise price of the incentive warrants is $0.44, vesting immediately, and expiring on January 9, 2018. The expiry date of these warrants has since been extended by one year, to January 9, 2019.

On January 19, 2017, the Company and NeutriSci International Inc. (“NeutriSci”) announced the successful development and initial trial of the industry’s first zero-sugar cannabinoid / pterostilbene edible tablet utilizing both NeutriSci’s and Lexaria’s proprietary and patented technologies. NeutriSci and Lexaria confirmed that the companies expect to officially bind the JV agreement to market and commercialize a line of edible products. Product development is continuing.

On February 8, 2017, the Company through its wholly owned Canadian subsidiary Lexaria CanPharm Corp., signed and entered a master collaborative research agreement with the National Research Council of Canada (“NRC”) to investigate technical aspects and new opportunities associated with bioavailability enhancement of lipophilic active ingredient compositions. Undercompositions using Lexaria’s patented DehydraTECH technology. The R&D Program determined that Lexaria’s DehydraTECH does not create a covalent-bonded new molecular entity. The R&D program also tested Lexaria’s formulations at highly acidic levels of pH 1.12, higher than many flavored beverages that have pH levels between 2.73 to 3.05, and mildly acidic levels of pH 4.82, and reports no chemical modification or presence of degradation of the agreement,active pharmaceutical ingredients for both of the formulation classes analysed in this aspect of the program: cannabinoids and nicotine polacrilex.

On August 8, 2019, the Company announced that its subsidiary, Lexaria CanPharm ULC., has been issued cannabis Research and Development (“R&D”) license LIC-7NONT76UNW-2019 by Health Canada with a four-year term until August 9, 2023 unless renewed.

On August 14, 2019, the NRC will both provide up to CAD$125,000 in fundingCompany announced four patent grants. Australia Patent #2016367036 Grant Date July 30, 2019 – Methods for this research, a total investment of up to CAD$250,000. The master research agreement has an 18-month term, during which a number of shorter-term studies will be undertaken. The collaboration will investigate and define the chemical nature of the molecular association that Lexaria`s patented technology is believed to effectuate betweenformulating orally ingestible compositions comprising lipophilic active agents, and fatty acids as solubility and bioavailability enhancing agents. The first phase of research under this agreement was underway as of August 31, 2017.

On February 8, 2017, the Company issued 29,091 shares of its common stock in settlement of $16,000 service fee, previously recognized within accounts payable and accrued liabilities.

On February 27, 2017, the Company received a Notice of Acceptance from the AustralianAustralia Patent Office that Lexaria’s Australian patent application 2015274698 was accepted with a patent issuance date expected in June, 2017. The Notice of Acceptance covers Lexaria patent application entitled “Food#2018220067 Grant Date July 30, 2019 – Food and beverage compositions infused with lipophilic active agents and methods of use thereof”, which has been accepted with the same set of claims previously issued inthereof, US Patent No 9,474,725 specific to non-psychoactive cannabinoids. Subsequently the Company received a Certificate#10,374,036 Grant Date August 6, 2019 - Food and beverage compositions infused with lipophilic active agents and methods of use thereof, and US Patent #10,381,440 / Grant for a Standard Patent No. 2015274698 dated June 15 2017Date August 13, 2019 - Food and beverage compositions infused with a twenty year term.lipophilic active agents and methods of use thereof.

On March 14, 2017, the Company commenced the formal design phase for studies to be conducted under the master collaborative research agreement with the NRC. A number of studies have been proposed and are currently being evaluated, with the intention to begin work and produce results over multiple intervals in the coming months. As noted above, the first phase of research under this agreement was underway as of August 31, 2017. In aggregate, results from these studies will add to the understanding of the physical and biochemical characteristics imparted on molecules that have been subjected to Lexaria’s technology, with a view to further demonstrating the power of the technology to prospective commercial partners across the various consumer product sectors the Company is targeting.

On March 24, 2017, the Company executed a twelve month marketing and lead generation campaign with Dig Media Inc. Investing News Network for $48,000.

7


On April 27, 2017, the Company issued 1,075,000 shares of its common stock from the exercise of warrants previously granted for proceeds of $242,047.50. All warrants were exercised by third parties who are neither officers nor directors of the Company.

On June 1st, 2017, the Company appointed Mr. Allan Spissinger as acting CFO, Corporate Secretary and Treasurer. The Company executed a twelve month consulting contract with M&E Services Ltd., solely owned by Mr. Allan Spissinger with monthly compensation of CAD$8,000. The Company may pay Mr. Spissinger a bonus from time to time, at its sole discretion. Mr. Spissinger was awarded 200,000 incentive stock options exercisable at $0.37 vesting immediately.

On June 19th, 2017, the Company entered into an agreement with a third party researcher for CAD$3,854 per month for a period of twelve months and continuing month to month and may be terminated thereafter with sixty days’ notice.

On June 19th, 2017, the Company executed a contract with Alex Blanchard Capital as manager of investor relations & communications. The agreement is for six months continuing month to month and may be terminated thereafter with one month’s notice for CAD$7,500 per month. Mr. Blanchard was granted 200,000 warrants exercisable at $0.29 and 300,000 stock options exercisable at $0.295 vesting 100,000 options at each of the 1st, 2nd and 3rd anniversaries of the contract provided that the contract is not terminated. As at August 31st, 2017 $37,878 was recognized in consulting for the grant of the warrants.

On June 22nd, 2017, pursuant to its agreement with Docherty Management Ltd. and C.A.B. Financial Services Ltd. the company issued 420,000 restricted common shares and cash compensation of $23,600.

On August 16th, 2017,22, 2019, the Company issued 663,525 sharesannounced the online commercial launch of its common stock from the exercise of warrants and options previously granted for proceeds of $97,030. All warrants and options were exercised by third parties who are neither officers nor directors of the Company.ChrgD+, a water-soluble multi-spectrum hemp oil in a powdered format with our DehydraTECH technology.

On August 16th, 2017,22, 2019, the Company entered intoannounced a consulting agreement with a third party issuing 500,000 warrants to buy one common share each at an exercise price of $0.44 and valid for one year. 200,000 warrants vested immediately and a value of $34,344 was recognizedpatent granted in consulting. 150,000 warrants vest DecemberAustralia: #2016367037 Grant Date August 15,th, 2017 and 150,000 warrants vest April 15th 2018. 2019 – “Stable ready-to-drink beverage compositions comprising lipophilic active agents”.

As at August 31, 2017, certain existing convertible debt was converted into common shares for the amount of $45,000 @ $0.15 for 300,000 common shares plus the accrued interest of $1,125 for 7,500 shares for a total issuance of 307,500 common shares.

On August 31, 2017, the Company issued 32,433 shares of its common stock in settlement of $12,000, previously recognized within accounts payable and accrued liabilities.

The Company experienced the following significant corporate developments subsequent to August 31, 20172019

On September 15th, 2017, the Company issued 625,000 shares of its common stock from the exercise of warrants previously granted for proceeds of $93,750. All warrants were exercised by third parties who are neither officers nor directors of the Company.

On October 31st, 2017,17, 2019, the Company announced it received a Notice of Allowance from the United States Patent and Trademark Office (“USPTO”) for the use of its technology as a delivery platform for all cannabinoids including THC; fat soluble vitamins; non steroidal anti-inflammatory pain medications (“NSAIDs”); and nicotine. The patent application number is 15/225,799, “Food and Beverage Compositions Infused With Lipophilic Active Agents and Methods of Use Thereof”.

On November 2nd, 2017, the Company announced it acquired 100% ownership interest in its majority owned subsidiary Poviva Tea, LLC. The Company previously owned a 51% interest in Poviva Tea, LLC and acquired the remaining 49% interest. Compensation was US$70,000, a waiver on certain debts, and a 5%, 20-year royalty on net profits of ViPova TeaTM tea, coffee, and hot chocolate sales. No Lexaria stock or options were issued.

8


Subsequent to August 31, 2017, the company plans to hold an annual and special meeting of stockholders at the office of our law firm, Macdonald Tuskey located in North Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, to include as partthat final study results of the proceedings2018 human clinical study evaluating CBD delivery and effectiveness using its patented DehydraTECH powered TurboCBD capsules have been published in the approval of the plan of conversion whereby our corporate jurisdiction will be changed from the State of Nevada to the Province of British Columbia, Canada by means of a process called a “conversion”peer reviewed medical journal, “Advances in Therapy”. Advances in Therapy focuses on clinical medicine and a “continuation”. Important details for stockholders related to the conversionpharmaceutical research and has been published continually since 1984.

The study was conducted and well tolerated in 12 healthy young male athletes and the associated risks for the company and stockholdersinvestigators concluded that further studies are included in the S-4 Registration Statement to be released, as of the writing of this document. There are risks associated with not proceeding with the conversion regarding the increasing complexity of compliance with the regulatory framework and the associated increasing costs, the restrictions on the promotion and sale of our stocks to US investors that limit the potential liquidity of our stock, and an increasingly complex environment that can negatively impact Lexaria even as an ancillary involved company via technology licensing to entities in the state legal cannabidiol and cannabis markets. As at the time of the writing of this document the date of the meeting had not been specified.warranted.

Page 8 of 83
Table of Contents

Food Science and Technology

Lexaria is a Biotechnologybiotechnology and food science company focused on developing and out-licensing its proprietary technology for improved taste, rapidity, and delivery of bioactive compounds in foods and other ingestible products Lexaria is focusing its capital and management time on its pursuit of intellectual property, technology licensing opportunities, an expanding portfolio of patent pending applications, and functional food and supplement formulations.

On November 11, 2014, the Company acquired 51% of PoViva Tea LLC (100% October 23, 2017) and executed an operating agreement to develop a business of legally producing, manufacturing, importing/exporting, testing, researching and developing, a line of hemp oil with cannabidiol-infused teas, drinks and foods. Lexaria oversees all aspects of the business including, but not limited to, production, product quality, licensing, testing, product legality, accounting, marketing, capital investment, capital raising, sales, branding, advertising and fulfillment. Pursuant to the agreement, there is a Management Committee, whereby there are two representatives from Lexaria and one of the founding members of PoViva. On October 31, 2017, Lexaria purchased all remaining ownership interest to own 100% of Poviva Tea LLC.

The Company introduced an expanding variety of hemp fortified consumer food products throughout 2015 to demonstrate Lexaria’s DehydraTECHTM technology to both consumers and potential licensees. From January 2015 to December 2015, seven (7) flavors of teas; hot chocolate; coffee, and two (2) flavors of protein energy bars were introduced – all utilizing Lexaria’s patented technology DehydraTECHTM for the more palatable and efficient delivery of bioactive molecules infused within those food products.

In the production of the products, for each raw material to be used in ViPova™ -brandedViPova branded products, the Company assesses if the product inputs and the completed products comply with all applicable food and drug laws, and that the inputs and the finished products meet all applicable legal and quality standards including and as it relates to hemp oil content; THC content; molds and mildews; heavy metals; and may measure additional components.

The US Federal government, through the US Department of Health and Human Services, owns US Patent #6630507, which among other things, claims that

“Cannabinoids have been found to have antioxidant properties, unrelated to NMDA receptor antagonism. This new found property makes cannabinoids useful in the treatment and prophylaxis of wide variety of oxidation associated diseases, such as ischemic, age-related, inflammatory and autoimmune diseases. The cannabinoids are found to have particular application as neuroprotectants, for example in limiting neurological damage following ischemic insults, such as stroke and trauma, or in the treatment of neurodegenerative diseases, such as Alzheimer'sAlzheimer’s disease, Parkinson'sParkinson’s disease and HIV dementia.”

For reference, cannabinoids are compounds that affect cannabinoid receptors located on many human cells. CB1 receptors are widely found within the human brain; and CB2 receptors are found with the human immune system and have been linked to anti-inflammatory and other responses.

Despite independent scientific findings in many locations around the world, some regulatory agencies do not officially recognize that a human endocannabinoid system exists.

9


Over one hundred different cannabinoids have been isolated from the cannabis plant, most of which do not have psychoactive properties. One that does have psychoactive properties is tetrahydrocannabinol (THC).THC. Endocannabinoids are produced naturally in the human body while phytocannabinoidsPhyto cannabinoids are produced in several plant species, most abundantly in the Cannabis plant.

Cannabidiol (“CBD”)

CBD is one of the major phytocannabinoidPhyto cannabinoid forms of cannabinoids and is not psychoactive, often contributing more than 35% of the extracts from the cannabis plant resin. CannabidiolCBD occurs naturally in other plant species beyond cannabis. For example, the most widely acknowledged alternative source of phytocannabinoidPhyto cannabinoid is in the better understood Echinacea species, in widespread use as a dietary supplement. Most phytocannabinoidsPhyto cannabinoids are virtually insoluble in water but are soluble in lipids and alcohol. The World Anti Doping Agency (“WADA”) has exempted CBD from its 2018 list of banned substances.

The Alternative Health sector is large and growing. A long termlong-term Medical Expenditure Panel Survey was conducted from 2002 until 2008 with at least 29,370 subjects asked repeatedly if they had seen any kind of health care practitioner in the previous six months. The survey recorded whether the health care provider was a “complementary and alternative medicine care professional,” including “homeopathic, naturopathic, or herbalist.”

Page 9 of 83
Table of Contents

Between 5.3% and 5.8% of the survey group at any one time reported that they had seen a complementary or alternative medicine provider. Based on the US population of ~323,000,000,~328,000,000, this suggests between 17.117.4 million and 18.719.0 million Americans are seeking an alternative health care professional at any given time.

Meanwhile the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, in an April 2011 NCHS Data Brief, reported that more than 50% of the population uses dietary supplements of one kind or another. Detailed findings from that report included:

Status of operation;Operations; Consumer product development and sales

More than 150 million Americans drink tea every day, amounting to some 79 billion servings of tea in America every year. Our launch of ViPova™ TeaViPova black tea brand is meant to tap into this existing demand. Part of our corporate strategy is to build national brands through products that large groups of potential customers are already familiar and comfortable with.

PoViva Tea, LLC (now Poviva Corp.). has filed multiple patents pending and has received several granted patents to bind active hemp oil ingredients with a lipid, potentially allowing for more efficient and comforting delivery of the CBD.

Lexaria began producing cash flows from its products in January 2015; focused2015 focusing on the immediate opportunities in the hemp-oil-sectors that are federally legal. Cannabinoids have been found by many researchers to have antioxidant properties and Lexaria plans to use the patented DehydraTECHTM patented process to infuse hemp oils into a number of popular food and beverages.

Lexaria has launched a line of premium products, always relying on ourits DehydraTECHTM patented infusion process, to bring hemp oil into the mainstream. Because hemp oil does not have psychoactive properties we expect our products to appeal to the widest possible customer base. To date we have focused our sales efforts across the continental USA. Some studies have found that 3% of the Canadian population regularly consumes hemp food products, while 1% of the American population regularly consumes hemp food products. We believe the consumption of hemp basedhemp-based food products offers exceptional growth possibilities.

According to Nutrition Business Journal, the Organic Food sector was a $246 billion industry in the USA during 2014, while Dietary Supplements was a $34.6 billion industry. According to Arcview, state-legalLegal Cannabis was a $4.7 billion US industry in 2015 and expected to grow to over a $20 billion sector before 2025 but is clearly a much smaller industry sector than the more established food sectors. Lexaria has not yet determined whether our hemp oil-infused products will be accepted into any or all three of these particular sectors.

10


Lexaria has a main corporate website (www.lexariabioscience.com) as well as smaller e-commerce focused websites devoted to consumer products. The majority of product sales have taken place through the e-commerce websites. A contracted national distribution center ensures rapid and accurate fulfillment of all orders. A 1-800 ordering center has also been placed into operation. Through its subsidiaries, Lexaria currently sells small quantities of 3 flavors of tea, a capsule, and a powdered drink additive, all infused with Lexaria’s technology to deliver multi spectrum hemp oil ingredients.

Lexaria had previously launched the “Lexaria Energy” brand that is 100% owned by the Company. Under this brand, the Company plans to develop hemp oil-infused food products for people with active lifestyles, such as protein bars, protein shakes and other similar products. On November 3, 2015, Lexaria Energy10 protein bars became available for retail sales with two flavors. The original contract manufacturer of these protein bars was unable to fulfill additional orders and we have not currently been able to locate and contract an alternative location to manufacture this more complicated food product, with the result that the product is temporarily discontinued while we search for a suitable manufacturing location.

Through the November 2014 acquisition of 51% of Poviva Teas LLC, and October 2017 100% acquisition, Lexaria acquired control of certain patents pending, allowances and grants with the United States Patent Office. Lexaria has worked to broaden the patents and extend their utility to molecules other than those originally named.

On June 11, 2015, Lexaria initiated the simultaneous filing of a U.S. utility patent application and an International patent application under the Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT) procedure, both atthrough the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (“USPTO”). These applications follow the Company’s 2014 and 2015 family of provisional patent application filings in the U.S. and serve two additional broad purposes:

1.

Lexaria is seeking protection of its intellectual property under international treaties. To this end Lexaria has filed for PCT patent application protection. There are 148 countries that are signatories to the Patent Cooperation Treaty, including such major markets as Canada, China, India, much of Europe and the Middle East, the United Kingdom and Japan among others.

Page 10 of 83
 
Table of Contents

2.

Lexaria believes its lipid infusion technology has applications beyond the delivery of just cannabinoids. Based on further formulation testing, Lexaria has included additional lipophilic molecules that may be delivered via food and beverage formats utilizing its technology, widely encompassing three major new market opportunities for the Company: Nicotine; Nonsteroidal Anti-Inflammatories (NSAIDs); and Vitamins.

In December 2015, the Company filed two further provisional patent applications in the U.S. These new applications served to further broaden the variety and applicability of base compounds that can be used when formulating the Company’s lipid basedlipid-based technology. The first of these applications identify compounds like edible starches (e.g., tapioca starch) that are commonly used in food products today and could, therefore, serve as a base for formulating and incorporating the Company’s Technology into a wide variety of every day food products. The second of these applications identify emulsifier compounds like gum Arabicarabic that are commonly used in beverage products today in order to facilitate similar flexibility for formulating the Company’s Technologytechnology in every day, shelf-stable beverages.

On October 26, 2016, the USPTO issued U.S Patent No. 9474725, Cannabinoid Infused Food and Beverage Compositions and Methods of Use Thereof, pertaining to our method of improving bioavailability and taste of certain cannabinoid lipophilic active agents in food products. This iswas the Company’s first patent granted and has a publish date of October 27, 2016 (June 1015 2017 in Australia No. 2015274698) and protects our technology for twenty years. Additional patent grants include, but are not limited to: the use of DehydraTECH technology as a delivery platform, “composition of matter” claims that protect the specific combination of substances which enable improved taste and bio absorption properties, that protect processes for making specific compositions of matter for enhanced cannabinoid delivery utilizing the DehydraTECH technology. Of note, Lexaria has received issuance of patents in its second and third patent families representing the first time the Company has been granted claims for use of its technology in connection with the treatment of specific diseases and medical conditions affecting humans, which the Company believes will prove to be of significance to the pharmaceutical industry sector as it further develops and grows. Our portfolio consists of the following granted patents:

Issued Patent #

Patent Issuance Date

Patent Family

US 9,474,725 B1

10/25/2016

Food and Beverage Compositions Infused With

Lipophilic Active Agents and Methods of Use Thereof

US 9,839,612 B2

12/12/2017

US 9,972,680 B2

5/15/2018

US 9,974,739 B2

5/22/2018

US 10,084,044 B2

9/25/2018

US 10,103,225 B2

10/16/2017

US 10,381,440

8/13/19

US 10,374,036

8/06/19

AUS 2015274698

6/15/2017

AUS 2017203054

8/30/2018

AUS 2018202562

8/30/2018

AUS 2018202583

8/30/2018

AUS 2018202584

1/10/2019

AUS 2018220067

7/30/19

AUS 2016367036

7/30/19

Methods for Formulating Orally Ingestible Compositions

Comprising Lipophilic Active Agents

AUS 2016367037

8/15/19

Stable Ready-to-Drink Beverage Compositions

Comprising Lipophilic Active Agents

The Company does not know and cannot know whether these strategies will be successful, or if successful, how long it will take to gain consumer acceptance and customer loyalty. It can be a challenge to be successful by introducing new consumer products to a competitive retail marketplace, and we can offer no assurances that our products will be a commercial success.

11


Page 11 of 83
Table of Contents

International patent protectionPatent Protection

When Lexaria first began examining the legal medical cannabis market in 2013, and entered the market in 2014, the Company believed it could make an impact in perhaps both the Canadian and U.S. marketplaces. Our pursuit and development of technology has expanded our potential area of impact, both geographically and by sector. Because of the applicability of our technology to markets outside of the legal cannabis sector, we have taken the necessary steps to protect that intellectual property within larger global markets regardless of whether they lie within the medical cannabis sector or in other unrelated sectors.sectors such as nicotine, vitamins, and pharmaceuticals.

Additional molecules

NICOTINE.Additional Molecules

NICOTINE. More than 99% of all nicotine that is consumed worldwide is delivered through smoking cigarettes. Approximately 6,000,000 deaths per year, worldwide, are attributed primarily to the delivery of nicotine through the act of smoking according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, which also estimates that over $170 billion per year is spent just in the USA on direct medical care costs for adult smokers. 69% of U.S. adult smokers want to quit smoking and 43% of US adult smokers have attempted to quit in any twelve-month period.

Worldwide, retail cigarette sales were worth $722 billion in 2013, with over 5.7 trillion cigarettes sold to more than 1 billion smokers.

RELEVANCE: Lexaria postulates that delivery of nicotine to satisfy current demand, utilizing our patent pending lipid-delivery technology in common food groups, could shift demand from smoking cigarettes to alternative nicotine-based food products. Since most of the adverse health outcomes of nicotine consumption are associated with the delivery method and only to a lesser degree to the actual ingestion of nicotine, there could be a vast positive community health outcome through the reduction in smoking cigarettes. Additional research and regulatory compliant investigations would need to be conducted before otherwise healthy foods such as tea, coffee or energy bar snacks containing nicotine could be introduced. Nicotine is a named molecule in the latest Lexaria patent applications.

NSAIDNON-STEROIDAL ANTI-INFLAMMATORIES. . Non-steroidal Anti-inflammatoriesNSAIDs are the second-largest category of pain management treatment options in the world. The global pain management market was estimated at $22 billion in 2011, with $5.4 billion of this market being served by NSAID’s.NSAIDs. The U.S. makes up over one-half of the global market. The opioids market (such as morphine) form the largest single pain management sector but are known to be associated with serious dependence and tolerance issues.

Some of the most commonly known NSAIDs are ASA (Aspirin), Ibuprofen (Advil, Motrin), and Acetaminophen (Tylenol). (Acetaminophen(Tylenol - Acetaminophen is not accepted by all persons to be an NSAID.)NSAID). Although NSAIDs are generally a safe and effective treatment method for pain, they have been associated with a number of gastrointestinal problems including dyspepsia and gastric bleeding.

RELEVANCE: Lexaria postulates that delivery of NSAIDs through a lipid-based mechanism could provide the beneficial properties of pain relief with lessened negative gastrointestinal effects, and also potentially deliver lower dosages of active ingredients with similar pain management outcomes as current pill forms at higher dosages. ASA, Piroxicam, Diclofenac, Indomethacin, Ibuprofen, and Acetaminophen are all named molecules in the latest Lexaria patent applications.

VITAMINS.VITAMINS. The global vitamin and supplement market is worth $68 billion according to Euromonitor. The category is both broad and deep, comprised of many popular and some lesser known substances. Vitamins in general are thought to be an $8.5 billion annual market in the U.S. The U.S. is the largest single national market in the world, and China and Japan are the 2nd2nd and 3rd3rd largest vitamin markets.

Vitamin E is fat soluble and can be incorporated into cell membranes which can protect them from oxidative damage. Global consumption of natural source vitamin E was 10,900 metric tons in 2013 worth $611.9 million.

12


RELEVANCE: Lexaria postulates that delivery of fat soluble vitamins through its patent-pending lipid-based delivery mechanism may result in less waste and lower dosages required than most current pill forms. As well, ingestion of pills is an unpleasant experience for many people so it is possible that vitamin delivery through common food groups could vastly expand market demand for this sector. Vitamin E is a named molecule in the latest Lexaria patent applications.

On August 11, 2015, Lexaria signed a license agreement with PoViva Tea LLC for $10,000, granting Lexaria a 35-year non exclusivenon-exclusive worldwide license to unencumbered use of PoViva Tea LLC’s IP Rights, including rights of resale. This license agreement ensures Lexaria has full access to the underlying patent pending infusion technology. On January 14, 2019 this agreement was updated whereby Poviva Corp. granted Lexaria an exclusive license to the DehydraTECH technologies lasting the later of 25 years of the expiration date of the last of Poviva Corp.’s granted patents.

Scientific testing and validation

On August 24, 2015, the Company announced potential industry-changing achievements in enhanced gastro-intestinal absorption of cannabidiol (CBD)CBD utilizing Lexaria’s patented technology. The third-party testing was conducted in two phases of in vitro tests beginning in June and completed in August 2015.

The independent laboratory results delivered average CBD permeability of 499% of baseline permeability, compared to CBD permeability without Lexaria’s technology.Technology. These results exceed Company expectations. This was assessed in a strictly controlled, in vitro experiment using a human intestinal tissue model. Samples of Lexaria’s commercially available CBD-fortified ViPova™ViPova black tea were administered in the model compared with concentration-matched CBD control preparations that lacked Lexaria’s patented formulation and process enhancements. Lexaria believes that its in vitro findings provide compelling evidence of the intestinal absorption enhancing capabilities of its technology, based on which it is exploring opportunities to progress to more advanced, follow-on bioavailability testing in animals.

Page 12 of 83
Table of Contents

The tests also showed 325% of baseline gastro-intestinal permeability of CBD comparing Lexaria’s CBD-fortified ViPova™ViPova black tea to a second control of CBD and black tea combined, without Lexaria’s patented formulation enhancements. This confirmed that the specialized processing undertaken by Lexaria during its manufacturing process together with its formulation enhancements, does indeed significantly improve absorption levels.

The bioavailability of CBD (or of THC) varies greatly by delivery method. Smoking typically delivers cannabinoids at an average bioavailability rate of 30% (Huestis (2007) Chem. Biodivers.Biodiverse. 4:1770–1804; McGilveray (2005) Pain Res. Manag. 10 Suppl. A:15A – 22A). By comparison, orally consumed cannabis edibles typically deliver cannabinoids at an average bioavailability rate of only 5% (Karschner et al. (2011) Clin. Chem. 57:66–75).

The Company’s present findings suggest that its DehydraTECHTM technology may achieve a 5-fold improvement in cannabinoid absorption in edible form over that which can be achieved without its proprietary process and formulation enhancements. This conceptually supports that Lexaria’s technology represents a significant breakthrough in cannabinoid delivery by approximating the high absorption levels achieved as though through administration by smoking, but without the associated negative effects on human health caused by smoking.

The tests were completed in two phases culminating with testing using simulated intestinal fluid conditions that delivered these findings. These results were stronger than earlier iterations of the tests that did not use a simulated intestinal fluid environment and contributed to Lexaria’s understanding of the mechanisms at work. For these and other reasons, Lexaria believes that bioavailability testing in animals is likely to yield even stronger absorption results in the presence of natural intestinal fluid conditions.

CBD has been repeatedly found to provide beneficial pain relieving, anti-inflammatory, anti-anxiety, neuroprotection, anti-psychotic, and anti-convulsive effects among others. Lexaria’s DehydraTECHTMpatented technology could significantly reduce individual serving requirements for CBD to consumers. This could lead to reduced costs of consumption for consumers and increased profitability for Lexaria.

Lexaria believes that the same technology used to enhance the absorption of CBD in the recent laboratory tests, is applicable to THC, nicotine, NSAIDs and other lipophilic compounds that are widely used today.

During January 2015, Lexaria conducted a study of nitric oxide levels in humans, as a biomarker for absorption of cannabidiol,CBD, with the expectation that it would provide additional evidence of the efficient absorption of cannabidiolCBD from Lexaria food products enhanced with hemp oil, by demonstrating the elevation of nitric oxide in the human body in response to product ingestion.

13


The study data from human subjects demonstrated significant elevation of systemic nitric oxide levels as a surrogate biomarker for cannabidiol (CBD) bioabsorptionCBD bio absorption in response to ingestion of Lexaria'sLexaria’s products. This provided clinical support for the CBD bioavailability enhancing properties of Lexaria'sLexaria’s patented DehydraTECHTM technology,Technology, on the premise that bioavailable CBD is known to elevate levels of the endocannabinoid anandamide in the human body which, in turn, stimulates release of nitric oxide in the vascular system.

In summary, consuming Lexaria and ViPova™Lexaria’s food products resulted in elevated levels of nitric oxide within the body. The results of the study indicated that all of Lexaria and ViPova™ food products elicited significant increases in salivary nitric oxide, achieving levels from 110 µM to as high as 220 µM in the test subjects. The ViPova beverage products generally had faster initial responses in as little as 15 minutes after product ingestion, whereas the initial responses from the Lexaria Energy protein-energy bars required 30 minutes. The faster response time with the beverage products was to be expected, given the relative ease of digesting liquids versus solids. All products sustained their maximum levels of nitric oxide detection through to the 60-minute end-points used in the study, indicating a need for additional study to determine the length of time that nitric oxide levels remain elevated following production consumption.

The study assessed six flavors of ViPova™ViPova tea (Yunan Black, Herbal Cherry Black, Earl Grey, Herbal Bengal Chai, Herbal Masala Chai and Decaf English Breakfast), ViPova™ViPova Columbian Supremo Coffee, ViPova™ViPova Hot Chocolate and Lexaria Energy Foods’ Chocolate Berry Date and Cashew Berry Date protein-energy bars.

Six healthy human subjects (3 male and 3 female) between the ages of 22 and 65 years of age were recruited for the study. Subjects were screened for cardiovascular and allergic response to hemp products, were non-smokers and did not have any history of substance or alcohol abuse. One product was studied per day across all six subjects, with each subject consuming a full product serving size. Subjects were required to refrain from eating food or using vape products for at least 12 hours before test article administration on each day of the study. Nitric oxide levels in the test subjects were assessed using a commercially available, colorimetric test kit designed to quantify systemic nitric oxide via a detectable salivary marker. Immediately before test article administration each day, all subjects were required to demonstrate a negative baseline nitric oxide saliva test. Subjects were considered to have a negative test strip reading at a level of 20 µM according to the test strip scale, and positive readings anywhere above this. Subjects performed salivary nitric oxide testing at 15, 30, 45 and 60 minutes’ post-consumption of each product. All subjects remained sedentary from baseline through to the completion of testing for each product.

Product distribution agreements

On January 28,

Page 13 of 83
Table of Contents

In August of 2018 we released results from our TurboCBD capsules in a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind European human clinical study that evaluated TurboCBD - a proprietary, DehydraTECH powered, CBD fortified hemp oil capsule developed by Lexaria. The degree and speed of CBD absorption into blood plasma and potential cardiovascular and cognitive performance enhancement in 12 healthy male volunteers were studied.

Key bioavailability data highlights from the study comparing the 90 mg dose of Lexaria’s TurboCBD to a 90 mg dose of a positive control formulation without Lexaria’s DehydraTECH technology were as follows:

·30 Minutes: CBD delivered from Lexaria’s TurboCBD capsules was absorbed much more effectively than from the positive control, delivering 317% more CBD to blood at the 30-minute mark of the study (i.e., 18.4 ng/mL compared to only 4.4 ng/mL on average respectively [95% CI; p=0.051]);

·60 Minutes: The TurboCBD capsules went on to deliver more CBD to the blood at the 60-minute mark (i.e., 38.8 ng/mL) than the positive control capsules were able to reach at any time during the 6-hour study, further demonstrating the exceptional rapidity of action and effectiveness of the TurboCBD capsules;

·90 Minutes: The TurboCBD capsules further went on to deliver significantly more CBD to the blood (86% more) than the positive control capsules at the 90-minute mark (i.e., 53.0 ng/mL compared to only 28.4 ng/mL respectively [95% CI; p=0.034]);

·Through to Study Completion: Lexaria’s TurboCBD capsules continued to deliver more CBD to blood than the positive control capsules at each subsequent time point in the study through to the 6-hour mark when the study was completed.

Additional study analysis was released in February 2019:

Key metabolic and hemodynamic performance findings linked to bioavailability enhancements were revealed in the study, which compared a 90 mg dose of Lexaria’s TurboCBD to a 90 mg dose without Lexaria’s DehydraTECH™ technology (the “positive control”) as well as a placebo, as follows:

·Analysis of mean arterial blood pressure (MAP) at peak blood levels of CBD achieved with Lexaria’s TurboCBD demonstrated a significant reduction in MAP compared to placebo (95% CI; p=0.027). This finding was not observed with the dose-matched positive control formulation for which there was no significant decrease in MAP compared to placebo (95% CI; p=0.625);

·Cerebral perfusion was also analysed by an index of conductance in the middle cerebral artery (MCA). The findings revealed that Lexaria’s TurboCBD caused the greatest increase in MCA conductance relative to both the positive control formulation and placebo (95% CI; p=0.017 and P=0.002 respectively);

Finally, over the six-hour study, analysis of the total area under the curve (AUC) demonstrated that Lexaria’s TurboCBD resulted in a notable trend for higher levels of CBD in the bloodstream overall than the positive control formulation with total AUC of 10,865 ± 6,322 observed with Lexaria’s formulation compared to 7,115 ± 2,978 observed with the positive control (95% CI; p=0.096). Furthermore, when normalized to body mass, the AUC at the peak CBD concentration was markedly and significantly (95% CI; p=0.02) higher with the TurboCBD 90 mg dose compared to the 90 mg dose positive control formulation.

These results corroborate and confirm other in vitro and in vivo studies that have evaluated Lexaria’s DehydraTECH technology. Although this study evaluated absorption only of CBD and its metabolites, Lexaria believes nearly identical bioavailability enhancement results would be achieved with other cannabinoids.

During March of 2019 we also launched an in vivo research program to test Lexaria designed nanotech enhancements comprised of eleven separate animal studies and released initial results during May 2019 demonstrating measurable quantities of cannabidiol into blood in as little as 2 minutes. In each arm of the animal studies, 10 male Sprague-Dawley rats were administered CBD at 25mg per kg of bodyweight. Delivery of CBD into the bloodstream was monitored over a 60-minute duration. In the first animal study results, Lexaria compared its standard DehydraTECH formulation that combines cannabinoids with long-chain fatty acids (“LCFA”) using Lexaria’s patented dehydration processing technique to a concentration-matched formulation utilizing coconut oil which is a commonly used MCT oil in the cannabis edibles industry.

·At 2 minutes DehydraTECH’s LCFA formulation delivered measurable CBD in blood, compared to no measurable CBD in blood until 6 minutes and onwards for the MCT oil formulation.

·At 15 minutes DehydraTECH’s LCFA formulation achieved a CBD blood concentration level that was 475% more than the MCT oil formulation; and, the DehydraTECH LCFA formulation CBD blood levels reached at 15 minutes were greater than the CBD blood levels reached by the MCT oil formulation at any time point during the 60-minute evaluation.

Page 14 of 83
Table of Contents

·At 60 minutes DehydraTECH’s LCFA formulation achieved a CBD blood concentration level of 319% more than the MCT oil formulation.

·Over the entire 60-minute study, the animals that received the standard DehydraTECH LCFA formulation achieved an average maximum CBD blood concentration level that was 334% more than the average maximum blood concentration level of the animals that received the MCT oil formulation (p<0.0021).

·Over the entire 60-minute study, the area under the curve (AUC) (total quantity of CBD delivered) for the Lexaria DehydraTECH LCFA formulation was 389% more than the MCT oil formulation (p<0.0011).

Lexaria also tested for brain tissue concentrations to quantify 8-hour CBD delivery from the DehydraTECH-enabled LCFA formulation compared to the MCT oil formulation and DehydraTECH’s LCFA formulation outperformed the MCT oil formulation by 246%.

The Company released additional results from its March 2019 research program wherein animal testing proved that combining Lexaria’s DehydraTECH delivery technology with generic nanotech techniques delivers 1,137% more CBD into animal brain tissue following oral ingestion than certain existing industry formulations. Lexaria combined its DehydraTECH delivery technology with a standard form of nanotechnology and analyzed subsequent delivery into brain tissue following oral ingestion. Delivery of CBD into the brain was reported 8 hours after dosing.

·The Lexaria DehydraTECH LCFA formulation without nanotech achieved an average brain tissue accumulation level that was 246% higher than the average for those animals that received the MCT oil formulation (p=0.0013).

·The Lexaria DehydraTECH LCFA formulation with nanotech achieved an average brain tissue accumulation level that was 1,137% higher than the average for those animals that received the MCT oil formulation (p=0.0178).

Further results demonstrated that Enhanced DehydraTECH led to 811% more CBD delivery into blood than generic industry MCT coconut-oil formulations (p=0.00008); and 110% more CBD into blood than DehydraTECH in its traditional format (p=0.02).

Page 15 of 83
Table of Contents

·Enhanced DehydraTECH delivered roughly twice as much CBD to animal blood at all measured time points in the study from the 15-minute mark onwards, compared to traditional DehydraTECH; and during the same time points from 717% to 1098% more CBD than the generic industry MCT coconut oil formulations.

·Enhanced DehydraTECH delivered more CBD to blood in just 12 minutes than the MCT coconut-oil formulation was able to achieve at any point during the 1-hour test duration.

·Enhanced DehydraTECH is even faster acting, reaching a maximum blood concentration level (“tmax”) in just 45 minutes compared to traditional DehydraTECH at 50 minutes and the MCT coconut oil formulation at 57 minutes.

·Enhanced DehydraTECH delivered an astonishing 1,937% more CBD into animal brain tissue after 8 hours compared to generic industry MCT coconut oil formulations; and 487% more than traditional DehydraTECH.

Both traditional DehydraTECH and Enhanced DehydraTECH delivered maximum blood concentration levels prior to the 60-minute end-of-test, with levels tapering off thereafter. The DehydraTECH technology therefore demonstrates both fast onset and fast offset as tested which is of interest for dose titration purposes when repeated dosing is desired.

We have also completed our first study evaluating DehydraTECH used in a topical cream formulation for absorption of CBD through human skin. Results proved significant increases in both speed and quantity of CBD absorption through skin when compared to control formulations. The absorption study was performed on human skin at a California-based laboratory that specializes in Franz diffusion cell skin permeability testing. Lexaria’s DehydraTECH technology was used together with a sophisticated oil-in-water emulsion formulation design and compared to a series of matching oil-in-water emulsion formulations prepared with the same CBD inputs, with and without the DehydraTECH technology and with and without two leading skin penetration enhancers currently used in the skin products industry. Several factors were measured, including the time required to detect CBD skin penetration and quantity, and peak amounts of CBD absorbed into and through the skin, at multiple testing intervals over a 48-hour duration.

Page 16 of 83
Table of Contents

Lexaria’s DehydraTECH-enabled topical formulation, absent either of the commercial penetration enhancers, was the fastest acting for absorption into the epidermis, dermis or through the skin into the systemic fraction representing permeation into the underlying circulatory system. Lexaria’s DehydraTECH-enabled product also had no odour even without the use of perfumes, contrary to other cannabinoid industry products that can be quite strongly odoriferous without the use of masking perfumes.

Furthermore, Lexaria’s DehydraTECH-enabled topical formulation without the addition of either of the commercial penetration enhancers, demonstrated the highest overall average quantity of CBD delivered through the skin and into the representative systemic fraction of all the formulations tested, with as much as a 225% increase in CBD permeability when compared to the highest performing commercial penetration enhancer formulation assessed and almost a 1,900% increase in CBD permeability when compared to a control formulation that was devoid of both the DehydraTECH technology or any commercial penetration enhancers. The commercial skin penetration enhancers only demonstrated performance that was on par or superior to the DehydraTECH-enabled formulations tested in so far as total CBD absorption into the shallow epidermis or dermis was concerned.

We have also completed our first ingestible nicotine in vivo (animal) absorption study. Lexaria is pursuing the use of its patented DehydraTECH technology as a possible new nicotine delivery method, an edible dose absorbed through the gastrointestinal tract, with potential both as a nicotine replacement therapy as well as an alternative product format for regular tobacco users.

DehydraTECH delivered the following major nicotine absorption performance improvements: 1,160% faster delivery of equivalent peak quantities of nicotine to the bloodstream than achieved with controls (within 15 min vs. 2.9 hours), 148% gain in the quantity of peak nicotine delivery to the bloodstream relative to controls, 560% higher brain levels of nicotine where nicotine effects are focused, compared to controls, Lower urine levels of nicotine excreted than controls, for enhanced nicotine activity and bioavailability over the course of the study, lower quantities of key liver metabolites in the bloodstream than controls as hypothesized, suggesting bypass of first pass liver metabolism.

Study Design Parameters:

The study was designed to principally assess the relative ingestible nicotine absorption performance of DehydraTECH-powered formulations compared to concentration-matched control formulations that lacked any form of delivery enabling technology in rats. Nicotine was administered in a nicotine polacrilex derivative format as is widely commercialized today in nicotine replacement therapy products such as chewing gums. Twelve male rats were divided into four groups of three, such that DehydraTECH and control formulations were each tested at a 1 mg/Kg and 10 mg/Kg dosage level. Formulations were administered orally and all rats were cannulated for blood collection at multiple intervals over an 8 hour duration post-dosing with the first data collection at the 15-minute mark. Urine and feces were also collected for up to a 24-hour duration post-dosing, and essential organ tissue samples were also collected for examination after the study. All samples were subjected to analytical testing in order to quantify the levels of nicotine therein, as well as the levels of three major liver metabolites thereof, hydroxycotinine, nicotine N’-oxide and cotinine, in order to assess the relative metabolite levels absorbed by the different formulations. Lexaria’s hypothesis was tested to prove that its DehydraTECH technology would influence more rapid and complete intestinal bio absorption of nicotine lymphatically with less metabolic degradation by the liver. All animals were also assessed for general tolerability of the administered formulations. The study was conducted at the same independent laboratory in Philadelphia where the Company completed its initial CBD absorption study in 2015.

Results & Observations:

The Lexaria formulations generally achieved faster absorption, higher peak absorption and higher overall quantities of nicotine, on average, in the blood than the concentration-matched control formulations at both the 1mg and 10 mg/Kg doses tested. Furthermore, as previously reported, there were no obvious signs of gastrointestinal distress such as vomiting or diarrhea indicating that the animals appeared to tolerate the treatment well.

Nicotine blood levels were evaluated multiple times over a period of 8 hours after dosing. In the 10mg/Kg dosing arm, the control formulation required nearly 3 hours to reach similar levels of blood absorption that the Lexaria formulation reached in only 15 minutes. Furthermore, the Lexaria formulation went on thereafter to demonstrate peak plasma levels that were 148% of those achieved by the control formulation. If replicated in human studies, these findings are suggestive that Lexaria’s technology could prove more effective in elevating blood nicotine levels through edible formats much more quickly and substantially than previously theorized, potentially making ingestible nicotine preparations a viable alternative to today’s available product formats while also leading to a more rapid nicotine craving satiation.

Page 17 of 83
Table of Contents

Analysis of the liver metabolites revealed, as expected, that overall levels in the blood of two of the three metabolites studied were higher in the control group than in the Lexaria formulation group at the 10 mg/Kg dose. This result was especially pronounced in the 45-minute to 2-hour time interval post-dosing which is consistent with the expected timing of release of metabolites in higher quantity into the bloodstream by the liver following normal physiological processing of ingested nicotine with the control preparation, compared to the DehydraTECH technology that is believed to elude first pass liver metabolism. The Lexaria formulation also demonstrated lower quantities of nicotine in the rat urine at both doses, which is consistent with the fact that the levels of nicotine in the rat blood remained higher over the duration of the study with the Lexaria formulation than with the control. The study also revealed that the Lexaria formulation at the 10 mg/Kg level achieved up to 5.6-times as much nicotine upon analysis of the rat brain tissue than was recovered with the matching control formulation. These findings together perhaps suggest prolongation of nicotine effectiveness with the Lexaria formulation which may also be beneficial in humans to control cravings over an extended time-period from a single edible nicotine dose.

In our follow-up third-party in vivo statistically significant study, including two groups of 20 animals, further defining delivery of nicotine in edible form at each of the 2, 4, 6, 8 and 10-minute intervals post-dosing, with 90.2% greater delivery than the concentration-matched control formulation by the 10-minute mark (95% CI; p=0.044), and significantly greater absorption levels than the control formulation at all subsequent time points in the study. Speed of onset is a key attribute for oral drug administration, and it is of particular importance for the consideration of non-inhalation nicotine delivery formats.

Key highlights of the follow-up study are as follows:

·Peak Level: 79% improvement in peak blood levels (maximum concentration or “Cmax”) at 394 ng/mL using Lexaria’s DehydraTECH technology vs. 220 ng/mL with the control (95% CI; p=0.0257);

·Total Quantity: 94% improvement in total quantity of nicotine delivered (area under the curve or “AUC”) to the blood during the 60-minute course of the study, at 266 hr•ng/mL versus 137 hr•ng/mL (95% CI; p=0.0086);

·Rapidity: Lexaria’s technology delivered nicotine into the blood stream by the first time interval of blood sampling at the 2-minute mark. On average, Lexaria’s technology delivered 203 ng/mL to the blood in aggregate of the 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12 and 15-minute time points, compared to only 120 ng/mL in aggregate over the same period by the control, an improvement of 70% (95% CI; p=0.0004).

In addition to the above described scientific testing and validation studies, Lexaria has also conducted various cannabinoid formulation experiments, together with potential DehydraTECH licensee partners, on chocolates, candies, gummies, mouth-melts, chocolate bars, protein bars, beverages such as beer, spices, tea, coffee, supplements and more over the past several years. Beverage formulations have produced cannabinoid water-based products including de-alcoholized beer that mask unwanted cannabis flavor and are fast acting. Chocolate formulations were reported as being the fastest acting, most consistent, and best-tasting products relative to comparator control formulations in approximately 70% of cases in a recent 2017 consumer study. As well, on March 22, 2016, Lexaria signedannounced results from another chocolate formulation consumer study in which test subjects ranked those chocolates that had been created with Lexaria’s technology as the best tasting, most palatable and providing the best overall experience of the chocolates sampled. Furthermore, the test subjects in that study indicated a distribution agreementtime of onset of the cannabis oil effects in as little as 15-20 minutes on average. The study included 12 volunteers who were all regular cannabis consumers with Telluride Coffee Roasters, LLC. This agreement has since ended and willexperience ingesting conventional edibles. All chocolates used in the study were blinded (unmarked) in order that the subjects could not be renewed due to inactivity.discern the product formulations applied.

Technology out-licensing

On May 14, 2016, the Company entered into a Licensing Agreement allowing the Licensee,with Nuka Enterprises, LLC (“Nuka”) for a two-year period, to utilize the Company’s technology to create, test, manufacture, and sell marijuana-infused consumable and/or topical products, in the state of Colorado, with an option of extending the terms of the Licensing Agreement to Washington, Oregon, and California. On April 30, 2018, the Company announced a new 10-year renewal licensing agreement with Nuka, maker of 1906 brand cannabis chocolates and other edible products. The new agreement provides Nuka with semi-exclusive ability to utilize the DehydraTECH technology across the US. Nuka also acquired an option to expand its products and brand to Canada, including using Lexaria’s existing chocolate and confections contract manufacturer licensee Cannfections Group Inc. The agreement incorporates new rights in product categories in addition to the original chocolate formats, which include candies, beverages, capsules and pills, and topical creams. On May 21, 2019, we announced a major expansion in operations by Nuka over the next two years into Illinois, Ohio, Massachusetts, Michigan and other states. The comprehensive semi-exclusive agreement provides Nuka and 1906 with competitive technological advantages until 2028. A second license provides Nuka and 1906 with the immediate ability to utilize DehydraTECH technology for CBD across the US marketplace.

Page 18 of 83
Table of Contents

On January 25, 2018, the Company announced it entered a definitive technology licensing agreement with a 7-year term with Cannfections Group Inc. whereby Lexaria is providing its patented DehydraTECH technology to empower next-generation performance in cannabis infused chocolates and candies to be developed and sold in Canada and internationally.

On February 26, 2018 the Company announced it entered an agreement with NeutriSci International Inc. whereby Lexaria granted an Intellectual Property License and Supply Agreement for the manufacturing and sale of CBD-based products. This agreement has been terminated effective March 15, 2019.

On February 27, 2018 the Company announced it entered a definitive technology licensing agreement with Los Angeles-based, privately-held Biolog, Inc. (“Biolog”) for a 5-year term whereby Lexaria provided its patented DehydraTECH technology to empower a unique set of next-generation food and beverage cannabis infusion products to be sold in the United States. On June 10, 2019 the Company terminated its license with Biolog.

On April 25, 2018, the Company announced that it entered a definitive technology licensing agreement with GP Holdings LLC, (“GP”) whereby Lexaria provided its patented DehydraTECH technology for cannabis infused beverages and topical skin products in California. GP acquired a 5-year semi-exclusive right. Subsequent to year end, on September 28, 2018, the Company cancelled the contract due to ongoing delays and non-performance.

On July 31, 2018, the Company and Hill Street Beverage Company Inc., (TSXV:BEER; “Hill Street”) jointly announced that they signed a Definitive Agreement to license Lexaria’s DehydraTECH, on a semi-exclusive basis, for a term of five (5) years, to produce a line of cannabis-infused alcohol-free beverages for Canadian distribution, following regulatory approval.

On January 15, 2019, the Company announced that its wholly-owned subsidiary Lexaria Nicotine and Altria Ventures Inc., an indirect wholly owned subsidiary of Altria Group, Inc. (“Altria”), executed definitive agreements to pursue innovation in oral, reduced risk nicotine consumer products using Lexaria’s patented DehydraTECH technology. Altria was granted a license to use Lexaria’s DehydraTECH technology for oral nicotine delivery forms on an exclusive basis in the United States and a non-exclusive basis elsewhere globally. Altria will pay Lexaria Nicotine a royalty on revenue generated from the sale of nicotine products containing DehydraTECH, until such time it may acquire 100% ownership in Lexaria Nicotine. There is no requirement that Altria must acquire 100% ownership in Lexaria Nicotine.

On April 24, 2019, the Company announced that it entered a definitive 5-year agreement, via its subsidiary Lexaria Canpharm ULC, to provide Lexaria’s patented DehydraTECH technology to a private California-based company for its utilization in certain CBD-based beverages to be produced and sold in California and Nevada that may include any combination of ready-to-drink beverages such as non-alcoholic beers, wines and spirits; cold or hot coffee or teas, sports drinks and more.

On May 7, 2019, the Company announced that it entered a definitive 5-year agreement, via its subsidiary Lexaria Hemp Corp., to provide Lexaria’s patented DehydraTECH technology to a private Nevada-based company for its utilization in certain CBD-based beverages to be produced and sold across the USA that may include any combination of ready-to-drink beverages such as non-alcoholic beers, wines and spirits; cold or hot coffee or teas, sports drinks and more.

On May 21, 2019, the Company announced a major expansion in operations by Nuka and its 1906 brand of edibles over the next two years into Illinois, Ohio, Massachusetts, Michigan and other states. The comprehensive semi-exclusive agreement provides Nuka and 1906 with competitive technological advantages until 2028. A second license provides Nuka and 1906 with the immediate ability to utilize DehydraTECH technology for CBD across the US marketplace.

On July 10, 2019, the Company announced that it entered a definitive 5-year agreement, via its subsidiary Lexaria Hemp Corp., to provide Lexaria’s DehydraTECH technology to Nic’s Beverages Ltd for use in CBD-based beverages to be produced and sold throughout the United States.

On July 11, 2019, the Company announced that it entered a definitive 5-year agreement, via its subsidiary Lexaria Hemp Corp., to provide Lexaria’s DehydraTECH technology to Universal Hemp LLC, a B2B manufacturing company of hemp-derived bulk ingredients to the nutraceutical and consumer packaged goods industries to be produced and sold across the USA immediately, and in Canada when regulations permit. Agreed to minimum payments over the life of the 5-year agreement are $3,750,000.

Page 19 of 83
Table of Contents

On July 24, 2019, the Company announced that it entered a 10-year Joint Manufacturing Partnership (JMP) with Hill Street to produce commercial products including processed THC cannabis and/or CBD hemp powder including among other categories; tablets, capsules, or packets for sale in Canada and for export where permitted. The JMP will also produce similar powders as a bulk ingredient for manufacturing processes for sale to other licensed producers seeking to use DehydraTECH to create their own products for sale within Canada. Profits from this business unit will be shared equally between Hill Street and Lexaria. In addition to the granting ofJMP, Hill Street acquired two global semi-exclusive licenses (with minor exceptions) to utilize Lexaria’s DehydraTECH THC beverage infusion technology around the license, the Company will provide support services to the Licensee in connection with the use of the Company’s technology during the term of the Licensing Agreement. The Licensing Agreement is the first contracted, predictable, and significant revenue stream to be achieved as a direct result of Lexaria’s technological advantage in the marketplace.world, valid for 10 years. Under the terms of the Licensing Agreement, the Licenseeagreement, Hill Street will pay a minimuman annual licensing fee of $122,000 in pre-defined staged payments$15,000 and up to $1,800,000 to Lexaria over the initial two-year term. As per the Licensing Agreement, if the Licensee wereby issuing $800,000 in common shares of Hill Street to introduce certain product lines utilizing Lexaria’s technologyLexaria initially with up to an additional $500,000 in shares of Hill Street when they enter each of the four states contemplated,first two international markets subject to TSXV and CSE approval, as applicable. Pursuant to the terms of the JMP agreements, Lexaria could expectwill issue an aggregate $250,000 in restricted common shares to receive a maximumHill Street. Closing of $1,064,000 over approximately 3.5 years,the Hill Street / Lexaria agreements is subject to normal regulatory approvals and the Licensee would enjoy semi-exclusivity to introduce its products in each of those states. As of August 31 2017 the company had received allclosing of the pre-defined paymentsHill Street / OneLeaf transaction announced by Hill Street. Subsequent to August 31, 2017 for a total receipt of $70,000 corresponding to the areas under the license agreement where the licensee2019, Hill Street has been active to-date.unable to close its transaction with OneLeaf and is currently searching for an alternate location from which to base the Hill Street / Lexaria agreements, thus there is a possibility that this transaction may not close as expected.

14


The continuation of our business interests in these sectors is dependent upon obtaining further financing, a successful programsprogram of development, and, ultimately, achieving a profitable level of operations. The issuance of additional equity securities by us could result in a significant dilution in the equity interests of our current stockholders. Obtaining commercial loans, assuming those loans would be available, will increase our liabilities and future cash commitments.

We are not yet profitable and have not yet demonstrated our ability to generate significant revenues from our business plan. We will require additional corporate funds if our existing capital is not sufficient to support the Company until potential future profitability is reached. There are no assurances that we will be able to obtain further funds required for our long-term operations. We do not expect to require additional operating capital during our fiscal 20182020 year. There can be no assurance that additional financing will be available to us when needed or, if available, that it can be obtained on commercially reasonable terms. If we are not able to obtain the additional financing on a timely basis, we will be unable to conduct our operations as planned, and we will not be able to meet our other longer-term obligations as they become due. In such event, we could be forced to scale down or perhaps even cease our operations. There is uncertainty as to whether we can obtain additional long-term financing if we do in fact require it.

Our business plan does not anticipateanticipates that we will hire a large number of employees or that we will require extensivetwo to four additional staff during fiscal 2020 to enhance operations in our new office and licenced laboratory space. We expect to be able to utilize contracted third partiesthird-parties for most of our production and distribution needs, instead focusing on our capital on higher value addedvalue-added aspects of the business such as research and development, and scientific testing. We have no current plans to build our own production facility.

Our company relies on the business experience of our existing management, on the technical abilities of consulting experts, and on the technical and operational abilities of its operating partner companies to evaluate business opportunities.

Competition

Competition in alternative health sectors and in consumer products in the USA is fierce. We expect to encounter competitive threats from existing participants in the sector and new entrants. Although PoViva Corp. has filed patent applications to protect intellectual property, there is no assurance that patents beyond those already issued will be granted nor that other firms may not file superior patents pending. Food supplements, organic foods, and health food markets are all well established and the Company will face many challenges trying to enter these markets. Lexaria is also aware of various competing technologies that exist in the marketplace that claim to also enhance the bio absorption of cannabinoids as Lexaria has demonstrated through repeated in vitro and in vivo scientific testing with its patented DehydraTECH technology. By and large, these technologies are mostly forms of nanotechnology that generally claim to enable the formation of microencapsulated microemulsions of cannabinoid active ingredients. These technologies can enable exceptional water solubility of cannabinoid ingredients and can impart improved intestinal bio absorption as a result.

Page 20 of 83
Table of Contents

Competition in nicotine, alternative nicotine delivery and nicotine cessation sectors in the USA is comprised of long-established entities, brands, and new technologies competing to create less harmful options. The sectors are complicated by the significant historical empirical data of older products or technologies versus the more limited published supporting data regarding the effects of new products or technologies. Due to the size of the sectors we expect to encounter competitive threats from existing participants and unknown new entrants. There is no assurance that other technologies already deployed, or in development, will not form the basis of product formats that competitors or consumers choose to utilize. It is also possible that historic delivery methods that have been in use and the familiarity with them may prevent adoption of products utilizing our technology in alternative delivery formats. Competing technologies or products may utilize known delivery formats or entirely new and unforecastable formats. Lexaria has demonstrated through scientific testing with its patented DehydraTECH technology that it delivers nicotine rapidly and effectively through oral delivery. We believe that if we can educate and influence consumers to adopt a food grade edible product format, and if US regulatory bodies authorize such formats, we may be able to offer a competitively successful new product format that utilizes our technology.

The legal marijuana industry is comprised of several sub-sectors and is legal under different guidelines in many states though it remains illegal under most federal laws. Notwithstanding, the overall sector is generally recognized to be one of the fastest growing in the USA, with state-legal revenue of over $8 billion in 2016. Independent projections and publicized reports expect revenue of $20 billion or more in 2020, both as the sector gains in credibility and acceptance, and as more and more states legalize either medical use or adult recreational use; or both. In June of 2019 there were eleven states and one district that had legalized medical and recreational use, and more than twenty-two other states that had legalized medical use. In any fast growingfast-growing industry, competition is expected to be both strong and also difficult to evaluate as to the most effective competitive threats. While we are an early adopter within the cannabinoid delivery sector, there are already reports of more than 300 public companies that have claimed to be involved in the sector in some fashion; and an unknown number of private companies. Our current strategies may prove to be ineffective as the sector grows and matures, and if so, we will have to adapt quickly to changing sectoral circumstances. Accordingly, the Company intends to aggressively pursue technology out-licensing opportunities not only within the cannabinoids sector where it is already active, but also across other sectors where its DehydraTECHTM technology is patent allowed and/or pending, including the opportunities in the vitamin and supplements sector, the pain relief sector and the nicotine products sector.

Competition

However, it is Lexaria’s belief that its patented DehydraTECH technology offers a host of benefits beyond what competing technologies can offer, including superior oral palatability, a more appealing and all-natural ingredient compositional profile from a food and beverage formulation perspective, more predictable time of delivery into bloodstream, and superior scalability and cost effectiveness from a manufacturing perspective. Lexaria believes that its DehydraTECH technology is, therefore, significantly distinguished from competing technologies in alternative health sectorsthese respects, with a view to growing the breadth and in consumer productsnumber of licensees that will adopt its technology for their product offerings going forward. Lexaria believes that these competitive advantages together with its wealth of scientific data showing noteworthy bio absorption enhancements with its DehydraTECH technology constitute a compelling value proposition for its prospective licensees, and it intends to continue to pursue license arrangements not only within the cannabinoids edibles sector where it is already active, but also in the USA is fierce. We expect to encounter competitive threats from existing participantsvarious other bioactive ingredient sectors identified in the sectorits issued and new entrants. Although PoViva Tea LLC has filed numerouspending patent pending applications to protect intellectual property, there is no assurance that patent applications beyond those already allowed and issued will be granted nor that other firms may not file superior patents pending. Food supplements, organic foods, and health food markets are all well established and our Company will face many challenges trying to enter these markets.applications.

Compliance with Government Regulation

At least 24

Over 30 States in the USA have passed some form of legislation related to that state’s permission to grow, cultivate, sell or use marijuana either for medical purposes or for recreational or “adult use” purposes; or both. The various state legislation is not necessarily harmonious with one another, leading to potential conflicts between state laws.another. It is most often not legal to transport cannabis-related products across state lines.

Lexaria does not “touch the plant” or manufacture, process or sell cannabis in any location within or outside of the USA. The Company compliesLexaria does conduct research and development on cannabis ingredients legally in Canada, in a federally licensed laboratory in compliance with all federal and local Canadian laws. We comply with US federal law that provides for certain exemptions for agricultural (industrial) hemp and certain byproductsby-products to be manufactured and sold in the US. The DehydraTECHTM technology may have applications within the legal marijuana sector and Lexariawe may seek to license that technology to companies that have met and comply with state regulations for the sale or distribution of cannabis related products in any particular jurisdiction.

15


Page 21 of 83
Table of Contents

Lexaria’s position is that, just as a telephone company provides communications services, and an electric company provides electrical power, our provision of technological services to a state-legal cannabis company is in compliance with laws and required regulations.

Lexaria’s patented DehydraTECHTM technology may also have applicationhas applications in completely separate sectors such as vitamins, non-steroidal anti-inflammatories,NSAIDs, and nicotine. We have no products nor operations in any of these sectors today.today, although we have commenced formulation development for research and validation purposes in each of these areas. We have a formal relationship with the largest cigarette company in the US and are conducting R&D with that company related to the possible development of nicotine oral products. If we enter any of these sectors at any time, we will be exposed to and of necessity will have to comply with, all local, state and federal regulations in each of those sectors. As a result of the possibility of Lexaria being involved in a number of disparate business sectors, compliance with government regulations could require significant resources and expertise from our company.

Our Former Planned Medical Marijuana Production Operations

The US Federal Government passed the 2018 Farm Bill (the “Bill”), in December of 2018, that may have significant impacts on industry segments that we operate and have products in and potentially change some of the regulatory compliance risks that may affect our business. The Bill includes lifting restrictions on advertising, marketing, banking and other financial services as well as allowing interstate commerce for hemp and hemp-derived CBD, removing barriers for intellectual property protections under federal law such as patents and trademarks, as well as several other measures that may positively impact these industry segments overall. The impact the Bill may have on other regulatory bodies and their regulations will require ongoing monitoring to determine the outcome and timing of any revisions.

Enertopia Joint Venture

On June 7, 2013May 28, 2014, our Company entered into a joint venture agreement with Enertopia Corp. for a prospective medical marijuana business under the Government of Canada implemented then-new legislation, theCanadian Marijuana for Medical Purposes Regulations (MMPR), concerning the production and sale of medical marijuana. The MMPR permitted the licensing of commercial growers beginning April 1, 2014, while eliminating existing regulations permitting the production of medical marijuana on a personal-use basis. The revised regulations created conditions(“MMPR”) for a commercial industry49% net ownership interest in Canada that is responsible for medical marijuana production and distribution, by eliminating small-scale, personal-use production. Commercial growers are now able to submit applications to Health Canada for the production of medical marijuana and, if licensed, supply patients who qualify for the product at a price that would be established by market forces and at the discretion of producers. As of June 2017, 50 producers have become licensed under the latest versions of Canadian regulations.business (Enertopia 51%) utilizing an identified location in Burlington, Ontario (the “Burlington Joint Venture”).

On June 26, 2015, we entered into a share purchasedefinitive agreement with Enertopia Corp. and Shaxon Enterprises Ltd. and Enertopia Corp. to sell our 49% interest in ourthe Burlington Ontario medical marijuana project application, includingJoint Venture and the MMPR application (no. 10MMPR0610) for our proposed production facility. The Burlington MMPR license application has continued in the application process under new ownership.number 10MMPR0610. Pursuant to the sale terms of the agreement, the joint venturewe received a non-refundable $10,000$4,900 deposit and isare entitled to receive up to $1,500,000$735,000 in milestone payments upon the Burlington facility becoming licensed under the MMPR. These monies would be split 51% to Enertopia and 49% to our Company. Notwithstanding the foregoing, we can neither guarantee nor provide a meaningful time estimate regardingthe Company does not expect the grant of a production license for the Burlington facility and at this time believe it may be unlikely to be awarded.facility.

Since June 12, 2015 the Company has had no direct involvement or ownership interest in any active or prospective operations or permit applications under the MMPR. The Company has no plans at this time to apply for a license in any jurisdiction for the production or sale of legal medical marijuana.

Market for Medical Marijuana in Canada

It is estimated by Health Canada that the overall market for medical marijuana in Canada under the new MMPR will be approximately $1.3 billion per year by 2024 (source: Health Canada/Canadian Broadcasting Corporation). Health Canada projects that the number of licensed users will increase to over 450,000 by 2024. Health Canada formerly sold medical marijuana, produced on contract by Prairie Plant Systems (formerly the only licensed producer in Canada), for $5 a gram. It is estimated that the price per gram under the new licensing system will average $7.60 per gram as producers set prices without interference from government (source Health Canada/Canadian Broadcasting Corporation).

Despite these estimates the medical marijuana market is relatively new and largely unproven. The adoption rate of commercial medical marijuana by qualified patients is difficult to determine but a portion (approximately 13%) of the qualified patient population is already conditioned to purchasing government contracted producers under the old system (source: Health Canada). Furthermore, it is anticipated that the convenience of a wide selection of medical marijuana strains delivered directly to patients in a discrete and concealed package will be attractive. Healthcare practitioners are key stakeholders as they will be signing and providing the medical documentation needed for patients to register with commercial producers. Regulations under the MMPR are not significantly different for healthcare practitioners already familiar with the process under the former MMAR. Licensed producers are held responsible for quality of the product provided as the MMPR outlines strict rules for quality assessment and control, cleanliness, manufacturing, and pesticide use. Security and diversion to the black market remain a concern but MMPR outlines strict rules for segregation of duties and security clearances, background checks for employees and officers, tracking of product in and out of the premises, and camera surveillance.

16


The Use of Marijuana for Medical Purposes (source Cantech Letter: Canada’s Medical Marijuana Industry: A Top Down Look)

The marijuana or cannabis plant, aka cannabis sativa, contains more than 80 cannabinoids, a group of chemical compounds which includes delta 9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) and cannabidiol (CBD). Research has shown that THC and CBD influence different regions of the central nervous system and have different effects on cannabis users [Borgwardt, Biol Psychiatry, 2008]. Most of the psychoactive effects associated with the use of cannabis are caused by THC, whereas CBD has been shown to have anti-anxiety, anti-nausea, anti-inflammatory, and anti-psychotic effects [Bergamaschi, Curr Drug Saf., 2011; Niesink, Front Psychiatry, 2013]. Cannabis smoking often leads to adverse effects such as increases and fluctuations in heart rate and blood pressure, euphoria, anxiety, and impairment of cognition and memory. Cannabis also contains a similar array of detrimental and carcinogenic compounds compared to cigarette smoke, some of which are present even at higher concentrations [Leung, J Am Board Fam Med, 2011].

Medical marijuana is used and has been tested in a variety of indications. In the last ten years, there have been estimated 300 individually registered trials used cannabis, THC, or CBD as the intervention. Excluding addiction, the indication that accounted for the majority (42%) of trials, medical marijuana has been tested in a wide range of indications to help patients cope with pain not only from disease itself, but also for relief from strong and sometimes toxic medication, such as chemotherapy. Neurological disorders, mental health, muscle and back problems, and inflammation (such as gastrointestinal disorders) are common indications under study.

Current Status of our Previous Medical Marijuana Business

Following the announcement of the MMPR in June, 2013, our management began identifying and evaluating opportunities for entry into the medical marijuana industry in Canada. We do not currently have any direct involvement in marijuana related activities in the United States or Canada.

Enertopia Joint Venture

On May 28, 2014, our company and Enertopia Corp. entered into a definitive agreement to develop a joint business for the production, manufacture, propagation, import/export, testing, research and development of marijuana in the Province of Ontario under the MMPR.

On June 26, 2015, we signed a Definitive agreement to sell our interest in the Burlington joint venture along with the MMPR application number 10MMPR0610. The Burlington MMPR license application will continue in the application process under new ownership. Pursuant to the agreement, the joint venture received a non-refundable $10,000 deposit and is entitled to receive up to $1,500,000 in milestone payments upon the Burlington facility becoming licensed under the MMPR. These monies would be split 51% to Enertopia and 49% to Lexaria. The Enertopia and Lexaria Master Joint Venture Agreement entered into on March 5, 2014 still governs the relationship between the Company and Enertopia. Notwithstanding the foregoing, we can neither guarantee nor provide a meaningful time estimate regarding the grant of a production license for the Burlington facility. There is no assurance that any monies will in fact ever be received from our sale of the license application.

Marijuana Production in the United States

In the United States it is still illegal under federal law to grow, cultivate and sell medical or adult use marijuana. However more than twenty-fiveapproximately thirty-two states have approved medical marijuana for use and at least eightten states have approved adult use regulations. The United States Federal government justice department has released memos that will respect the individual states where strict guidelines are followed and enforced so that the health, safety and security are protected at all times by state authorities but there is no assurance that federal laws will not at any time be more vigorously enforced. If the individual state framework fails to protect the public the Federal government will act in enforcing the controlled substances act of 1970 and the DEA will enforce the federal law.

17


As at the date of this document, our company has not entered into any prospective or definitive arrangements to produce or distribute marijuana products in the United States and has no intention of engaging in such marijuana related activities in the United States. However, our company continually reviews opportunities and monitors legal and regulatory developments related the medical marijuana sector in both Canada and the United States. We anticipate that we may re-evaluate our participation in the United States medical marijuana sector in the event that medical marijuana production becomes federally sanctioned and, in the meantime, we plan to limit our foray into the marijuana industry to ancillary involvement based on out-licensing of our DehydraTECHTM technology to state licensed producers.

On November 8, 2016 referendums held in various US states increased those areas in the USA where either medical or recreational use marijuana was state-legal. More than 50% of the US population now lives in a state where either medical or recreational marijuana use is permitted by state law, although it is still banned by US federal laws.

Page 22 of 83
Table of Contents

Contractors

The Company primarily uses

We utilize employees, sub-contractors and consultants in the intellectual property development and licensing, and alternative health product sectors. ItCompany operations. We have added four employees during the year and additional research personnel may be added during fiscal 2020 with the granting of our license from Health Canada for the research lab. We primarily engagesengage with consultants to serve our executive needs.

On November 27, 2008, the

The Company entered into a consultinghad an agreement with CAB Financial Services Ltd. (“CAB") wholly owned, wholly-owned by ChristopherChris Bunka, for $8,000a consulting fee of $144,000 per month plus applicable taxes. Effective Decemberyear and has negotiated a 3-year term renewal management contract with Chief Executive Officer Chris Bunka retroactively effective January 1, 2014,2019. The annual compensation payable is CDN$350,000 per year and the following performance incentives.

Performance Incentives

·A performance bonus equal to 50% of the annual compensation may be payable upon the completion of certain performance criteria as determined by the board of directors of Lexaria. Compensation equal to 2% of the consideration received by the Company from the sale of a subsidiary, excluding certain circumstances. Certain compensation to be paid upon a change of control excluding certain circumstances and participation in the Company’s approved stock option plans.

The Company updated the consultingappointed Mr. John Docherty as President of Lexaria effective April 15, 2015. The Company had an agreement for consulting serviceswith Docherty Management Limited, wholly-owned by Mr. John Docherty with compensation of $10,000 a month plus applicable taxes.

On December 1 2016 the Company entered into a new consulting agreement for consulting services of $12,000 a monthCAD$180,000 plus applicable taxes with CAB, supersedingper year and has negotiated a 3-year term renewal management contract CAD$300,000 per year and the prior agreement. The term of the agreement is two years but can be terminated by either party by providing two months notice. The Company may pay Mr. Bunka a bonus from time to time, at its sole discretion. Mr. Bunka will be entitled to receive common stock-based and stock option based bonuses upon achieving certain milestones during the time of his consultancy with the Company. These milestones are during the first 12 months after the date of the agreement with CAB,:following performance incentives.

Revenue Incentive Milestones (Revenue Incentives “A”)

Intellectual Property Milestones (IP Incentives “B”)

18


On December 1, 2014, the Company updated its consulting agreement for consulting services of CAD$7,500 a month plus applicable taxes (from CAD$5,500 plus applicable taxes) with BKB Management Ltd a consulting company controlled by Lexaria’s former Chief Financial Officer, Bal Bhullar. Ms. Bhullar resigned as the Company’s chief financial officer effective April 29, 2016.

On December 23, 2014, the Company entered into an Executive Management consulting agreement with Mr. Tom Ihrke for consulting services of $3,000 a month. Mr. Ihrke subsequently tendered his resignation on March 8, 2016.

On June 1st, 2017, the Company appointed Mr. Allan Spissinger as acting CFO, Corporate Secretary and Treasurer. The Company executed a twelve monththree-year consulting contract with M&E Services Ltd. (M&E), a wholly owned company wholly-owned by Mr. Allan Spissinger, with monthly compensation of CAD$8,00012,000 including an 8% annual increase superseding the previouslyprevious CAD$3,400 plus hourly billing for additional work and applicable taxes.8,000 per month contract that included 200,000 incentive stock options exercisable at $0.37. The Company may pay Mr. Spissinger a bonus from time to time, at its sole discretion. Mr. Spissinger was awarded 200,000 incentive stock options exercisable at $0.37 vesting immediately. Mr. Spissinger will be entitled to receive additional common stock-based and stock option basedoption-based bonuses upon achieving certain milestones during the time of his consultancy with the Company. These milestones are during the first 12 months after the date of the agreement with M&E Services Ltd.:are:

)

The Company appointed Mr. John Docherty as President of Lexaria effective April 15, 2015. On March 1, 2017, the Company executed a twenty four month consulting contract with Docherty Management Limited, solely owned by Mr. John Docherty with monthly compensation of CAD$15,000 plus applicable taxes, superseding the previous agreement with monthly compensation of CAD$12,500 plus applicable taxes. The Company may pay Mr. Docherty a bonus from time to time, at its sole discretion. Pursuant to the previous agreement, Mr. Docherty received 800,000 stock options and 924,000 restricted common shares of the Company. Mr. Docherty will be entitled to receive additional common stock-based and stock option based bonuses upon achieving certain milestones during the time of his consultancy with the Company. These milestones are during the first 12 months after the date of the agreement with Docherty Management Ltd.:

“C”)

·During the term of the agreement, for each provisional patent application substantively devised by M&E and successfully created, written and filed with the US Patent Office for the Company’s technology, M&E will be entitled to an award of up to 100,000 common shares of the Company to a maximum value of $250,000 at the time of issuance; or a cash award not to exceed $10,000 for an idea or concept originally conceived by M&E but more than 80% of the subsequent work, time and expenses paid for by the Company.

On June 19th,19, 2017, the Company executed a contract with Alex Blanchard Capital as manager for investor relations and communications. The agreement is for six months continuing month to month for CAD$7,500 per month and may be terminated thereafter with one month’s notice for CAD$7,500 per month.notice. Mr. Blanchard was granted 200,000 warrants exercisable at $0.29 and 300,000 stock options exercisable at $0.295 vesting 100,000 options at 1st – 3rd anniversaries of the contract provided that the contract is not terminated. Mr. Blanchard will be entitled to receive additional common stock-based and stock option basedoption-based bonuses upon achieving certain milestones during the time of his consultancy with the Company. These milestones are during the first 12 months after the date of the agreement with Alex Blanchard Capital:

office manager and assistant to the CEO and CFO. The agreement is for two years continuing month to month thereafter and may be terminated with one month’s notice for CAD$6,500 per month. The contractor was granted 250,000 warrants exercisable at $0.83. They will be entitled to receive additional common stock-based and stock option based bonuses upon achieving certain milestones during the time of their consultancy with the Company. These milestones are during the first 12 months after the date of the agreement:

We do not expect any material changes

·Revenue Incentives “A” as defined above, with the exception that the common share awards are revised to 75,000 shares instead of 100,000, 40,000 instead of 50,000, 150,000 instead of 200,000 and 80,000 instead of 100,000.

Our business plan contemplates additional increases in the number of contractorsemployees and other personnel over the next 12 month12-month period although individual personnel changesto enhance operational and fluctuations should always be expected. Weour in-house R&D capacity. When beneficial to do andso we will continue to outsource contract employment or engagements as needed. However,Additional capacity may be required with product advancement or retail acceptance of our new products, we may need to retain additional contractorspersonnel particularly in the fields of product manufacturing, development, sales and distribution. It is not possible to accurately project potential needs into the future based on circumstances that may or may not occur.

Research and Development

Lexaria incurred $54,185 (2016 $9,024)$555,730 (2018 $492,864) in research and development expenditures overduring the last fiscal year. With the successful financing efforts during fiscal 2017, the Company announced a $1 million budget to conduct research and development and additional scientific testing.period ending August 31, 2019. Specific R&D programs are in ongoing development at this time and will be tightly related to our financial ability to undertake such steps.each research phase for each molecule. Due to the notice of allowance in October 2017 significantlyour expanding the Company’s portfolio coverage, Lexaria is examiningwe are continuing to examine accelerated timetable options for testing, research and development.

19


The Company’s earlier plans to includein vitro absorption tests of our patented technology of molecules such as: Vitamin E, Ibuprofen, and Nicotine. We alsoNicotine allowed us to perform testing on Nicotine with positive results. Our plan to conduct our first everin vivo absorption tests on CBD also yielded positive results. Ongoing testing plans are proceeding to further define molecular compatibility, absorption rates, timing and viable formats of delivery.

The Company continually focuses on nicotine, all duringnew R&D programs to investigate potential additional commercial applications for its technology. These include, but are not limited to, ongoing programs to explore methods to integrate nanoemulsification chemistry techniques together with its technology that have demonstrated positive results to date, programs to further enhance intestinal bio absorption rates with its technology, as well as ongoing programs to expand the upcoming fiscal year.

types and breadth of product form factors into which its technology can be applied. Depending on how many of these tests are undertaken, it could requireR&D budgets of as much as $1,000,000, or as little as $65,000,are expected to do so.vary significantly. It is in our best interests to remain flexible at this early stage of our R&D efforts in order to capitalize on potential novel findings from early-stage tests and thus re-direct research into specific avenues that offer the most reward.

Subsidiaries

Lexaria has one whollyits wholly-owned subsidiaries; Lexaria CanPharm ULC, PoViva Corp., Lexaria Hemp Corp., Kelowna Management Services Corp. and Lexaria Pharmaceutical Corp, and our majority owned subsidiary Lexaria CanPharm Corp.Nicotine LLC. On January 15, 2019, the Company announced the initial investment of $1,000,000 from Altria Ventures Inc., an indirect wholly-owned subsidiary of Altria Group, Inc., for a Canadian corporation. We also have a 51%-owned subsidiary Poviva Tea, LLC which was incorporated on December 12, 2014, under the laws of the State of Nevada. As of October 2017 Poviva Tea, LLC is a 100% owned subsidiary. We also have a 50%-owned subsidiary Ambarii Trade Corporation that was incorporated on April 24, 2017 under the laws of the Province of British Columbia.16.667% equity interest along with certain other rights in Lexaria Nicotine LLC.

Item 1A. Risk Factors

Much of the information included in this quarterly report includes or is based upon estimates, projections or other "forward“forward looking statements"statements”. Such forward looking statements include any projections or estimates made by us and our management in connection with our business operations. While these forward-looking statements, and any assumptions upon which they are based, are made in good faith and reflect our current judgment regarding the direction of our business, actual results will almost always vary, sometimes materially, from any estimates, predictions, projections, assumptions or other future performance suggested herein.

 

Page 24 of 83
Table of Contents

Risks Associated with Our Business

Because cannabis

Much of the information included in this quarterly report includes or is a controlled substancebased upon estimates, projections or other “forward looking statements”. Such forward looking statements include any projections or estimates made by us and our management in some regulatory jurisdictionsconnection with our Licensee’s operations may be subject to regulatory actions.business operations. While these forward-looking statements, and any assumptions upon which they are based, are made in good faith and reflect our current judgment regarding the direction of our business, actual results will almost always vary, sometimes materially, from any estimates, predictions, projections, assumptions or other future performance suggested herein.

Lexaria and its subsidiaries are not involved directly or indirectly in the cultivation, processing, distribution, or utilization of Cannabis or Cannabis derived components. All of Lexaria’s consumer products utilize legally sourced Hemp and Hemp components in their production. Lexaria has an ancillary involvement exposure via out-licensing of its patented technology to licensees that may utilize the technology in the production of products that contain contents which are locally or state approved but federally controlled. Where licensee’s products contain controlled contents any revenue streams from such licensee’s may be interrupted by regulatory involvement in their business. It is possible some jurisdictions may even interpret Lexaria’s ancillary involvement as in contravention

Risks Associated with regulations.Our Business

Lexaria has no knowledge of any non-compliance by its licensees with the regulatory framework(s) in which its licensee(s) operate.

Because there is no assurance that we will generate material revenues, we face a high risk of business failure.

There can be no assurance that our current or future products will be successful, and we cannot be sure that our overall business model within any particular sector will ever come to fruition, and if they do, will not decline over time. We may not recover all or any portion of our capital investment in product development, marketing, or other aspects of the business. Although we will exercise due consideration in our development of new products, and the marketing of them, ultimate consumer acceptance of these products is not reliably forecastable.

In addition, our product development plans may be curtailed, delayed or cancelled as a result of lack of adequate capital and other factors, such as weather, compliance with governmental regulations, current and forecasted prices for input costs of food products and changes in the estimates of costs to complete the projects. We will continue to gather information about our planned products, and it is possible that additional information may cause our company to alter our schedule or determine that a product should not be pursued at all. You should understand that our plans regarding our products are subject to change.

20


Our revenues now are primarily generated from being a food sciences and products company.out licensing of our technology. We should be considered to be a start-up: the revenue recognized for the yearperiod ended August 31, 20172019 was $63,639.$222,610.

The food industry is highly competitive and there is no assurance that we will be successful in developing or successfully selling products.

The food industry is intensely competitive. We compete with numerous individuals and companies, including many food manufacturing and production companies, which have substantially greater technical, financial and operational resources and staff. Accordingly, there is a high degree of competition for desirable distribution channels, “shelf space” and salespeople in both the food industries as well as the legal cannabis industries. We cannot predict if the necessary funds can be raised to assist in our development of any distribution channels that may be helpful to our ability to generate sales and potential profits.

There can be no assurance that we will develop any product that will meet with widespread consumer acceptance.

Both new and established food and cannabis products fail to generate consumer interest on a regular basis. There is no assurance that a food or cannabis product that is successfully adopted by consumers at one time; will still be in demand at a future time. If we cannot develop and sell products in commercial quantities, our business will fail.

Even if we develop food, consumer packaged goods (“CPG”) or intellectual property-based products or revenue streams, the potential profitability of each depends upon factors beyond the control of our company.the Company.

The potential profitability of food and CPG products and of intellectual property revenue streams is dependent upon many factors beyond our control. For instance, prices and markets for food products are unpredictable, highly volatile, potentially subject to controls or any combination or other factors, and respond to changes in domestic, international, political, social and economic environments. These changes and events may materially affect our future financial performance. These factors cannot be accurately predicted and the combination of these factors may result in our company not receiving an adequate return on invested capital.

In addition, a product or technology that is initially successful and possibly even profitable may not remain so due to changes in consumer demand, regulatory environments, or other causes. There is no assurance that an initially successful product or technology will remain so.

Our failure to protect our intellectual property may have a material adverse effect on our ability to develop and commercialize our products

Because patents involve complex legal and factual questions, the issuance, scope, validity, and enforceability of patents cannot be predicted with certainty.

Some of our patent pending applications may not be granted as patents. Even if patents are issued, they may not be issued with claims of sufficient breadth to protect our nutrient infusion technology or may not provide us with competitive advantage against competitors with similar products or technologies. Issued patents may be challenged, invalidated, or circumvented. If patents issued to us are invalidated or found to be unenforceable, we could lose the ability to exclude others from making, using or selling the inventions claimed. Moreover, an issued patent does not give us the right to use the patented technology or commercialize a product using the technology. Third parties may have blocking patents that could be used to prevent us from developing our products, selling our products, or commercializing our nutrient infusion technology. Others may also independently develop products or technologies similar to those that we have developed or may reverse engineer or discover our trade secrets through proper means.

Enforcing a claim that a third party infringes on, has illegally obtained or is using an intellectual property right, is expensive and time-consuming and the outcome is unpredictable. In addition, enforcing such a claim could divert management’s attention from our business. If any intellectual property rights were to be infringed, disclosed to, or independently developed by a competitor, our competitive position could be harmed. Any adverse outcome of such litigation or settlement of such dispute could subject us to significant liabilities and could put one or more of our patent pending applications at risk of being invalidated.

21


Furthermore, because of the substantial amount of discovery required in connection with intellectual property litigation, there is risk that some of our confidential information could be compromised. This disclosure could provide our competitors with access to our proprietary information and may harm our competitive position.

The marketability of food products will be affected by numerous factors beyond our control which may result in us not receiving an adequate return on invested capital to be profitable or viable.

The marketability of food products will be affected by numerous factors beyond our control. These factors include market fluctuations in consumer preferences for various food items based on factors such as pricing, macro trends for certain ingredients or flavors, ruling by regulators on health issues associated with certain foods, and more. The exact effect of these factors cannot be accurately predicted, but the combination of these factors may result in us not receiving an adequate return on invested capital to be profitable or viable.

Both food productsFood, CPG and cannabis products are subject to comprehensive regulation which may cause substantial delays or require capital outlays in excess of those anticipated causing an adverse effect on our company.

Food, CPG and cannabis production, marketing, sales and safety operations, and cannabis products and sales operations, are subject to federal, state, and local laws relating to the protection of human health and safety. Food production and cannabis operations are each also subject to federal, state, and local laws and regulations which seek to maintain health and safety standards through a wide variety of regulations. Various permits from government bodies may be required by us in order to conduct our business. Regulations and standards imposed by federal, provincial, or local authorities may be changed at any moment in time and any such changes may have material adverse effects on our activities. Changes in regulations are impossible to foresee and could be disruptive or destructive to our business plans and execution. Moreover, compliance with such laws may cause substantial delays or require capital outlays in excess of those anticipated, thus causing an adverse effect on us. Additionally, we may be subject to liability for contaminants or other damages. To date, we have not been required to spend any material amount on compliance with environmental regulations. However, we may be required to do so in the future and this may affect our ability to expand or maintain our operations.

Page 25 of 83
Table of Contents

We may not acquire market share or achieve profits due to competition in our industries.

Our company operates in highly competitive marketplaces with various competitors. Increased competition may result in reduced gross margins and/or loss of market share, either of which would seriously harm its business and results of operations. Management cannot be certain that the company will be able to compete against current or future competitors or that competitive pressure will not seriously harm its business. Some of our company’s competitors are much larger and have greater access to capital, sales, marketing and other resources. These competitors may be able to respond more rapidly to new regulations or devote greater resources to the development and promotion of their business model than the company can. Furthermore, some of these competitors may make acquisitions or establish co-operative relationships among themselves or with third-parties in the industry to increase their ability to rapidly gain market share.

Uncertain demand for our products or technology may cause our business plan to be unprofitable.

Demand for food products, CPG, technology delivery benefits and medical marijuana and cannabis or hemp related products is dependent on a number of social, political and economic factors that are beyond the control of our company. While we believe that demand for these products will continue to grow across North America, there is no assurance that such increase in demand will happen or that our endeavors will be profitable.

Without additional financing to develop our business plan, our business may fail.

Because we have generated only minimal revenue from our business and cannot anticipate when we will be able to generate meaningful revenue from our business, we will need to raise additional funds to conduct and grow our business. We do not currently have sufficient financial resources to completely fund the development of our business plan. We anticipate that we will need to raise further financing. We do not currently have any arrangements for financing and we can provide no assurance to investors that we will be able to find such financing if required. The most likely source of future funds presently available to us is through the sale of equity capital. Any sale of share capital will result in dilution to existing security-holders.

Our failure to protect our intellectual property may have a material adverse effect on our ability to develop and commercialize our products

Because patents involve complex legal and factual questions, the issuance, scope, validity, and enforceability of patents cannot be predicted with certainty.

Some of our patent pending applications may not be granted as patents. Even if patents are issued, they may not be issued with claims of sufficient breadth to protect our nutrient infusion technology or may not provide us with competitive advantage against competitors with similar products or technologies. Issued patents may be challenged, invalidated, or circumvented. If patents issued to us are invalidated or found to be unenforceable, we could lose the ability to exclude others from making, using or selling the inventions claimed. Moreover, an issued patent does not give us the right to use the patented technology or commercialize a product using the technology. Third-parties may have blocking patents that could be used to prevent us from developing our products, selling our products, or commercializing our nutrient infusion technology. Others may also independently develop products or technologies similar to those that we have developed or may reverse engineer or discover our trade secrets through proper means.

Enforcing a claim that a third-party infringes on, has illegally obtained or is using an intellectual property right, is expensive and time-consuming and the outcome is unpredictable. In addition, enforcing such a claim could divert management’s attention from our business. If any intellectual property rights were to be infringed, disclosed to, or independently developed by a competitor, our competitive position could be harmed. Any adverse outcome of such litigation or settlement of such dispute could subject us to significant liabilities and could put one or more of our patent pending applications at risk of being invalidated.

Furthermore, because of the substantial amount of discovery required in connection with intellectual property litigation, there is risk that some of our confidential information could be compromised. This disclosure could provide our competitors with access to our proprietary information and may harm our competitive position.

Page 26 of 83
Table of Contents

The failure to secure customers may cause our operations to fail.

We currently do not have many long-term agreements with any customers. Many of our products and services may be provided on a “onetime” basis. Accordingly, we will require new customers on a continuous basis to sustain our operations.

Because cannabis is a controlled substance in some regulatory jurisdictions our Third-Party Licensee’s operations may be subject to regulatory actions.

Lexaria and its subsidiaries are not involved directly or indirectly in the cultivation, processing, distribution, or utilization of cannabis or cannabis derived components. All of Lexaria’s consumer products utilize legally sourced hemp and hemp components in their production. Lexaria has an ancillary involvement exposure via out-licensing of its patented technology to licensees that may utilize the technology in the production of products that contain contents which are locally or state approved but federally controlled. Where licensee’s products contain controlled contents any revenue streams from such licensee’s may be interrupted by regulatory involvement in their business.

Lexaria has no knowledge of any non-compliance by any of its licensees with the regulatory framework(s) in which its licensee(s) operate.

There can be no assurance that we will develop any product that will meet with widespread consumer acceptance.

Both new and established food and CPG products fail to generate consumer interest on a regular basis. There is no assurance that a food or CPG product that is successfully adopted by consumers at one time; will still be in demand at a future time. If we cannot develop and sell products in commercial quantities, our business could fail.

The food CPG industries are highly competitive and there is no assurance that we will be successful in developing or successfully selling products.

The food and CPG industries are intensely competitive. We compete with numerous individuals and companies, including many food manufacturing and production companies, which have substantially greater technical, financial and operational resources and staff. Accordingly, there is a high degree of competition for desirable distribution channels, “shelf space” and salespeople in both the food and CPG industries. We cannot predict if the necessary funds can be raised to assist in our development of any distribution channels that may be helpful to our ability to generate sales and potential profits.

The marketability of food and CPG products will be affected by numerous factors beyond our control which may result in us not receiving an adequate return on invested capital to be profitable or viable.

The marketability of food and CPG products will be affected by numerous factors beyond our control. These factors include market fluctuations in consumer preferences for various food items based on factors such as pricing, macro trends for certain ingredients or flavors, ruling by regulators on health issues associated with certain foods, and more. The exact effect of these factors cannot be accurately predicted, but the combination of these factors may result in us not receiving an adequate return on invested capital to be profitable or viable.

If we are unable to hire and retain key personnel, we may not be able to implement our business plan.

Our success is largely dependent on our ability to hire highly qualified personnel. This is particularly true in those parts of our business that are related to intellectual property generation or exploitation. These individuals are in high demand and we may not be able to attract the personnel we need. In addition, we may not be able to afford the high salaries and fees demanded by qualified personnel, or may lose such employees after they are hired. Failure to hire key personnel when needed, or on acceptable terms, would have a significant negative effect on our business.

We are not the "operator"“operator” of vertically integrated food production facilities, and so we are exposed to the risks of our third-party operators.

We rely on the expertise of contracted third-parties for their judgment, experience and advice related to the manufacturing and/or packaging of our food products. We can give no assurance that these third partythird-party operators or consultants will always act in our best interests, and we are exposed as a third partythird-party to their operations and actions and advice in those operations and activities in which we are contractually bound.

22


Page 27 of 83
Table of Contents

Our management has limited experience and training in the food processing and manufacturing industries, and in the cannabis products industries, and could make uninformed decisions that negatively impact our operations and our company.

Because our management has limited experience and training in the food processing and manufacturing industry, and in the cannabis products industry, we may not have sufficient expertise to make informed best practices decisions regarding our operations. It is possible that, due to our limited knowledge, we might elect to undergo manufacturing processes and incur financial burdens that a more experienced food manufacturing team might elect not to complete. Our ability to internally evaluate food and cannabis operations and opportunities could be less thorough than that of a more highly trained management team.

Our independent certified public accounting firm, in the notes to the audited financial statements for the year ended August 31, 2016 states that there is a substantial doubt that we will be able to continue as a going concern.

We have experienced significant losses since inception. Failure to arrange adequate financing on acceptable terms and to achieve profitability would have an adverse effect on our financial position, results of operations, cash flows and prospects. As a result of the financings completed during the year ended August 31 2017, management believes it has sufficient funds to meet its obligations as they become due for the next twelve months.

The possession, cultivation and distribution of marijuana may under certain circumstances lead to prosecution under United States federal law, which may cause our business to fail.

All applicable Regulations, in the United Sates, over 20 states,

Over 30 US States, including our state of incorporation, Nevada, have approved and regulate medical marijuana use. Similarly, foureleven states have approved and regulate non-medical marijuana use by adults. However, it remains illegal under United States federal law to grow, cultivate or sell marijuana for any purpose. In that regard, the United States Justice Department has released the COLE Memorandum of 8-29-13 which states that the Justice Department will not prioritize the prosecution of marijuana related activities authorized under state laws provided that state authorities implement and enforce strict guidelines to ensure the health, safety and security of the public. Where the individual state framework fails to protect the public, the Justice Department has instructed federal prosecutors to enforce the Controlled Substances Act of 1970. The Department of Justice has not, to our knowledge, published any policy or guidance specifically regarding the participation of a United States corporation in lawful medical marijuana related activities outside of the United States.

We do not currently, nor at any time in our corporate history have we ever cultivated, grown, processed, manufactured or sold marijuana in any location. Although we believe this fact to provide protection against prosecution related to marijuana legislation, we cannot provide any assurance to that effect. We do not hold a license in any jurisdiction enabling us to grow or sell marijuana or cannabis related edibles, but because of our business model we do not feel that is a barrier to entry for us. Instead, we plan to license our technology related to bio-absorptionbio absorption of THC, to those entities that do have valid licenses in various North American jurisdictions to sell cannabis related edibles. If we are unable to license our technology to any valid license holders, then we may be shut out of this market.

Our company has no operating history and an evolving business model, which raises doubt about our ability to achieve profitability or obtain financing.

Our company has no significant history of operations in the legal medical marijuana sector, the legal hemp oil infused products sector, or in the food products sector. Moreover, our business model is still evolving and subject to change. Our company'scompany’s ability to continue as a going concern is dependent upon our ability to obtain adequate financing andand/or to reach profitable levels of operations. In that regard we have no proven history of performance, earnings or success. There can be no assurance that we will achieve profitability or obtain future financing.

Uncertain demand for our products may cause our business plan to be unprofitable.

Demand for medical marijuana and for cannabis or hemp related products is dependent on a number of social, political and economic factors that are beyond the control of our company. While we believe that demand for marijuana and hemp products will continue to grow across North America, there is no assurance that such increase in demand will happen or that our endeavors will be profitable.

23


We may not acquire market share or achieve profits due to competition in our industries.

Our company operates in highly competitive marketplaces with various competitors. Increased competition may result in reduced gross margins and/or loss of market share, either of which would seriously harm its business and results of operations. Management cannot be certain that the company will be able to compete against current or future competitors or that competitive pressure will not seriously harm its business. Some of our company's competitors are much larger and have greater access to capital, sales, marketing and other resources. These competitors may be able to respond more rapidly to new regulations or devote greater resources to the development and promotion of their business model than the company can. Furthermore, some of these competitors may make acquisitions or establish co-operative relationships among themselves or with third parties in the industry to increase their ability to rapidly gain market share.

Conflicts of interest between our company and our directors and officers may result in a loss of business opportunity.

Our directors and officers are not obligated to commit their full time and attention to our business and, accordingly, they may encounter a conflict of interest in allocating their time between our future operations and those of other businesses. In the course of their other business activities, they may become aware of investment and business opportunities which may be appropriate for presentation to us as well as other entities to which they owe a fiduciary duty. As a result, they may have conflicts of interest in determining to which entity a particular business opportunity should be presented. They may also in the future become affiliated with entities, engaged in business activities similar to those we intend to conduct.

In general, officers and directors of a corporation are required to present business opportunities to a corporation if:

·The corporation could financially undertake the opportunity;

·The opportunity is within the corporation’s line of business; and

·It would be unfair to the corporation and its stockholders not to bring the opportunity to the attention of the corporation.

Page 28 of 83
Table of Contents

We have adopted a code of ethics that obligates our directors, officers and employees to disclose potential conflicts of interest and prohibits those persons from engaging in such transactions without our consent. Despite our intentions, conflicts of interest may nevertheless arise which may deprive our company of a business opportunity, which may impede the successful development of our business and negatively impact the value of an investment in our company.

The speculative nature of our business plan may result in the loss of your investment.

Our operations are in the start-up stage only, and are unproven. We may not be successful in implementing our business plan to become profitable. There may be less demand for our services than we anticipate. There is no assurance that our business will succeed and you may lose your entire investment.

Changing consumer preferences may cause our planned products to be unsuccessful in the marketplace.

The decision of a potential client to purchase our products may be motivated by cultural phenomena or by perceived health or nutritional benefits. The cultural desirability or popularity of hemp related products is subject to change due to factors beyond our immediate control. Similarly, the perceived nutritional or health related benefits of our products are subject to change in light of continuing research or the introduction of competitive products. Changes in consumer and commercial preferences, or trends, toward or away from cannabis or hemp related products would have a corresponding impact on the development of the market for our current and planned products. There can be no assurance that the products supplied by our company and or its partners will be successful in establishing or maintaining a significant share of the consumer market.

24


General economic factors may negatively impact the market for our planned products.

The willingness of businesses to spend time and money on non-essential food and health products may be dependent upon general economic conditions; and any material downturn may reduce the likelihood of consumers incurring costs toward what some may consider a discretionary expense item. Willingness by customers to buy our products may be dependent upon general economic conditions and any material downturn may reduce the potential profitability of the food sciences or medical marijuana business sectors.

A wide range of economic and logistical factors may negatively impact our operating results.

Our operating results will be affected by a wide variety of factors that could materially affect revenues and profitability, including the timing and cancellation of customer orders and projects, competitive pressures on pricing, availability of personnel, and market acceptance of our services. As a result, we may experience material fluctuations in future operating results on a quarterly and annual basis which could materially affect our business, financial condition and operating results.

Loss of consumer confidence in our company or in our industry may harm our business.

Demand for our services may be adversely affected if consumers lose confidence in the quality of our services or the industry’s practices. Adverse publicity may discourage businesses from buying our services and could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.

Unethical business practices may compromise the growth and development of our business.

The production and sale of medical marijuana is an emerging industry in which business practices are not yet standardized and are subject to frequent scrutiny and evaluation by federal, state, provincial, and municipal authorities, academics, and media outlets, among others,others. Although we intend to develop our business in accordance with best ethical practices, we may suffer negative publicity if we, our partners, contractors, or customers are found to have engaged in any environmentally, insensitive practices or other business practices that are viewed as unethical.

The failure to secure customers may cause our operations to fail.

We currently do not have many long-term agreements with any customers. Many of our products and services may be provided on a “onetime” basis. Accordingly, we will require new customers on a continuous basis to sustain our operations.

We could be required to enter into fixed price contracts which will expose us to significant market risk.

Fixed price contracts require the service provider to perform all agreed services for a specified lump-sum amount. We anticipate a material percentage of our services will be performed on a fixed price basis. Fixed price contracts expose us to some significant risks, including under-estimation of costs, ambiguities in specifications, unforeseen costs or difficulties, and delays beyond our control. These risks could lead to losses on contracts which may be substantial, and which could adversely affect the results of our operations.

Page 29 of 83
Table of Contents

If we fail to effectively and efficiently advertise, the growth of our business may be compromised.

The future growth and profitability of our food and CPG products business and our technology licensing business will be dependent in part on the effectiveness and efficiency of our advertising and promotional expenditures, including our ability to (i) create greater awareness of our services, (ii) determine the appropriate creative message and media mix for future advertising expenditures, and (iii) effectively manage advertising and promotional costs in order to maintain acceptable operating margins. There can be no assurance that we will experience benefits from advertising and promotional expenditures in the future. In addition, no assurance can be given that our planned advertising and promotional expenditures will result in increased revenues, will generate levels of service and name awareness or that we will be able to manage such advertising and promotional expenditures on a cost-effective basis.

25


Our success is dependent on our unproven ability to attract qualified personnel.

We will depend on our ability to attract, retain and motivate our management team, consultants and other employees. There is strong competition for qualified technical and management personnel in the food science sector, and it is expected that such competition will increase. Our planned growth will place increased demands on our existing resources and will likely require the addition of technical personnel and the development of additional expertise by existing personnel. There can be no assurance that our compensation packages will be sufficient to ensure the continued availability of qualified personnel who are necessary for the development of our business.

Without additional financing to develop our business plan, our business may fail.

Because we have generated only minimal revenue from our business and cannot anticipate when we will be able to generate meaningful revenue from our business, we will need to raise additional funds to conduct and grow our business. We do not currently have sufficient financial resources to completely fund the development of our business plan. We anticipate that we will need to raise further financing. We do not currently have any arrangements for financing and we can provide no assurance to investors that we will be able to find such financing if required. The most likely source of future funds presently available to us is through the sale of equity capital. Any sale of share capital will result in dilution to existing security-holders.

We may not be able to obtain all of the licenses necessary to operate our business, which would cause our business to fail.

Our operations may require licenses and permits from various governmental authorities to conduct our business activities. We believe that we will be able to obtain all necessary licenses and permits under applicable laws and regulations for our operations and believe we will be able to comply in all material respects with the terms of such licenses and permits. However, such licenses and permits are subject to change in various circumstances. There can be no guarantee that we will be able to obtain or maintain all necessary licenses and permits.

If we fail to effectively manage our growth our future business results could be harmed and our managerial and operational resources may be strained.

As we proceed with our business plan, we expect to experience significant and rapid growth in the scope and complexity of our business. We will need to add staff to market our services, manage operations, handle sales and marketing efforts and perform finance and accounting functions. We will be required to hire a broad range of additional personnel in order to successfully advance our operations. This growth is likely to place a strain on our management and operational resources. The failure to develop and implement effective systems, or to hire and retain sufficient personnel for the performance of all of the functions necessary to effectively service and manage our potential business, or the failure to manage growth effectively, could have a materially adverse effect on our business and financial condition.

Risks Associated with Our Common Stock

Trading on the OCTQBOTCQX and CSE may be volatile and sporadic, which could depress the market price of our common stock and make it difficult for our stockholders to resell their shares.

Our common stock is quoted on the OTCQBOTCQX electronic quotation service operated by OTC Markets Group Inc. Trading in stock quoted on the OTCQBOTCQX is often thin and characterized by wide fluctuations in trading prices, due to many factors that may have little to do with our operations or business prospects. This volatility could depress the market price of our common stock for reasons unrelated to operating performance. Moreover, the OTCQBOTCQX is not a stock exchange, and trading of securities on the OTCQBOTCQX is often more sporadic than the trading of securities listed on a quotation system like NASDAQ or a stock exchange like Amex. Accordingly, shareholders may have difficulty reselling any of the shares.

26


Page 30 of 83
Table of Contents

Our stock is a penny stock. Trading of our stock may be restricted by the Securities and Exchange Commission’s penny stock regulations which may limit a stockholder’s ability to buy and sell our stock.

Our stock is a penny stock. The Securities and Exchange Commission has adopted Rule 15g-9 which generally defines “penny stock” to be any equity security that has a market price (as defined) less than $5.00 per share or an exercise price of less than $5.00 per share, subject to certain exceptions. Our securities are covered by the penny stock rules, which impose additional sales practice requirements on broker-dealers who sell to persons other than established customers and “accredited investors”. The term “accredited investor” refers generally to institutions with assets in excess of $5,000,000 or individuals with a net worth in excess of $1,000,000 or annual income exceeding $200,000 or $300,000 jointly with their spouse. The penny stock rules require a broker-dealer, prior to a transaction in a penny stock not otherwise exempt from the rules, to deliver a standardized risk disclosure document in a form prepared by the Securities and Exchange Commission which provides information about penny stocks and the nature and level of risks in the penny stock market. The broker-dealer also must provide the customer with current bid and offer quotations for the penny stock, the compensation of the broker-dealer and its salesperson in the transaction and monthly account statements showing the market value of each penny stock held in the customer’s account. The bid and offer quotations, and the broker-dealer and salesperson compensation information, must be given to the customer orally or in writing prior to effecting the transaction and must be given to the customer in writing before or with the customer’s confirmation. In addition, the penny stock rules require that prior to a transaction in a penny stock not otherwise exempt from these rules, the broker-dealer must make a special written determination that the penny stock is a suitable investment for the purchaser and receive the purchaser’s written agreement to the transaction. These disclosure requirements may have the effect of reducing the level of trading activity in the secondary market for the stock that is subject to these penny stock rules. Consequently, these penny stock rules may affect the ability of broker-dealers to trade our securities. We believe that the penny stock rules discourage investor interest in and limit the marketability of our common stock.

The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, or FINRA, has adopted sales practice requirements which may also limit a stockholder’s ability to buy and sell our stock.

In addition to the “penny stock” rules described above, FINRA has adopted rules that require that in recommending an investment to a customer, a broker-dealer must have reasonable grounds for believing that the investment is suitable for that customer. Prior to recommending speculative low priced securities to their non-institutional customers, broker-dealers must make reasonable efforts to obtain information about the customer’s financial status, tax status, investment objectives and other information. Under interpretations of these rules, FINRA believes that there is a high probability that speculative low priced securities will not be suitable for at least some customers. FINRA requirements make it more difficult for broker-dealers to recommend that their customers buy our common stock, which may limit your ability to buy and sell our stock and have an adverse effect on the market for our shares.

The speculative nature of our business plan may result in the loss of your investment.

Our operations are in the start-up stage only and are unproven. We may not be successful in implementing our business plan to become profitable. There may be less demand for our services than we anticipate. There is no assurance that our business will succeed and you may lose your entire investment.

Because we do not intend to pay any dividends on our shares, investors seeking dividend income or liquidity should not purchase our shares.

We have not declared or paid any dividends on our shares since inception, and do not anticipate paying any such dividends for the foreseeable future. We presently do not anticipate that we will pay dividends on any of our common stock in the foreseeable future. If payment of dividends does occur at some point in the future, it would be contingent upon our revenues and earnings, if any, capital requirements, and general financial condition. The payment of any common stock dividends will be within the discretion of our Board of Directors. We presently intend to retain all earnings to implement our business plan; accordingly, we do not anticipate the declaration of any dividends for common stock in the foreseeable future.

Investors seeking dividend income or liquidity should not invest in our shares.

Because we can issue additional shares, purchasers of our shares may incur immediate dilution and may experience further dilution.

We are authorized to issue up to 220,000,000 shares. The board of directors of our company has the authority to cause us to issueapprove additional shares,share issuances, and to determine the rights, preferences and privileges of such shares, without consent of any of our stockholders. Consequently, our stockholders may experience more dilution in their ownership of our company in the future.

27


Page 31 of 83
Table of Contents

Other Risks

Protection against environmental risks.

We believe that our operations comply, in all material respects, with all applicable environmental regulations.

Our operating partners maintain insurance coverage customary to the industry; however, we are not fully insured against all possible environmental risks.

Any change to government regulation/administrative practices may have a negative impact on our ability to operate and our profitability.

The laws, regulations, policies or current administrative practices of any government body, organization or regulatory agency in the United States, Canada, or any other jurisdiction, may be changed, applied or interpreted in a manner which will fundamentally alter the ability of our company to carry on our business.

The actions, policies or regulations, or changes thereto, of any government body or regulatory agency, or other special interest groups, may have a detrimental effect on us. Any or all of these situations may have a negative impact on our ability to operate and/or our profitably.

Our by-laws contain provisions indemnifying our officers and directors against all costs, charges and expenses incurred by them.

Our by-laws contain provisions with respect to the indemnification of our officers and directors against all costs, charges and expenses, including an amount paid to settle an action or satisfy a judgment, actually and reasonably incurred by him, including an amount paid to settle an action or satisfy a judgment in a civil, criminal or administrative action or proceeding to which he is made a party by reason of his being or having been one of our directors or officers.

Investors’ interests in our company will be diluted and investors may suffer dilution in their net book value per share if we issue additional shares or raise funds through the sale of equity securities.

Our constating documents authorize the issuance of 220,000,000 shares of common stock with a par value of $0.001. In the event that we are required to issue any additional shares or enter into private placements to raise financing through the sale of equity securities, investors’ interests in our company will be diluted and investors may suffer dilution in their net book value per share depending on the price at which such securities are sold. If we issue any such additional shares, such issuances also will cause a reduction in the proportionate ownership and voting power of all other shareholders. Further, any such issuance may result in a change in our control.

Our by-laws do not contain anti-takeover provisions, which could result in a change of our management and directors if there is a take-over of our company.

We do not currently have a shareholder rights plan or any anti-takeover provisions in our By-laws. Without any anti-takeover provisions, there is no deterrent for a take-over of our company, which may result in a change in our management and directors.

28


As a result of aThe majority of our directors and officers are residents of other countries other than the United States, as a result, investors may find it difficult to enforce, within the United States, any judgments obtained against our company or our directors and officers.

Other than

Our head office and the majority of our operations officesassets are located in Kelowna, British Columbia and we do not currently maintain a permanent place of business within the United States.lease administrative office space in Phoenix, Arizona. In addition, a majority of our directors and officers are nationals and/or residents of countries other than the United States, and all or a substantial portion of such persons’ assets are located outside the United States. As a result, it may be difficult for investors to enforce within the United States any judgments obtained against our company or our officers or directors, including judgments predicated upon the civil liability provisions of the securities laws of the United States or any state thereof.

Our by-laws contain provisions indemnifying our officers and directors against all costs, charges and expenses incurred by them.

Our by-laws contain provisions with respect to the indemnification of our officers and directors against all costs, charges and expenses, including an amount paid to settle an action or satisfy a judgment, actually and reasonably incurred by him, including an amount paid to settle an action or satisfy a judgment in a civil, criminal or administrative action or proceeding to which he is made a party by reason of his being or having been one of our directors or officers.

Trends, risks and uncertainties.

We have sought to identify what we believe to be the most significant risks to our business, but we cannot predict whether, or to what extent, any of such risks may be realized nor can we guarantee that we have identified all possible risks that might arise. Investors should carefully consider all of such risk factors before making an investment decision with respect to our common shares.

Page 32 of 83
Table of Contents

Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments

As a “smaller reporting company”, we are not required to provide the information required by this Item.

None.

Item 2. Properties

Executive Offices

The address of our principal executive office is 156 ValleyviewUnit 100–740 McCurdy Road, Kelowna BC Canada V1X3M4, where we share ~1,200 square feetV1X 2P7 with rent of office space, which includes several offices for a monthly rental of CAD$1,052.4,823. We have administrative functions located in Phoenix, Arizona at nominal cost. Our telephone number is (250) 765 6424. We have an additional administrative office space in Langley British Columbia and Phoenix Arizona at nominal costs. Our current locations provide adequate office space for our purposes at this stage of our development.

Significant Acquisitions and Dispositions

On November 12, 2014,

We have leased a new head-office location in Kelowna, Canada, that included the Company signed an agreement with PoVivapurchase and acquired 51%construction of PoViva with an initial consideration of $50,000. Lexaria serves as the Manager of Business Operations of PoViva’s Teas. As Manager, Lexaria oversees most aspects of the business including, but not limitedoffice equipment, furniture, computers, and communications systems. We also constructed space for a Canadian federal licensed laboratory on-premises for our internal R&D purposes, for which a license has been received from Health Canada. Costs incurred to Accounting, Marketing, Capital Investment, Capital Raising,Sales, Branding, Advertising and Fulfillment. The Founders served until 2015 as Production Manager and were responsible for all aspects of production, product quality, licensing, testing, and product legality. It is also expected that both parties to this Agreement will assist the other to fulfill their obligations as needed and the cost of business will be borne by revenues earned by the company and general corporate funds. As of October 2017 Lexaria acquired 100% of PoViva for US$70,000, a waiver on certain debts, and a 5%, 20-year royalty on net profits of ViPova TeaTMtea, coffee, and hot chocolate sales. No Lexaria stock or options were issued.

On June 26, 2015, we entered into a definitive agreement with our joint venture partner Enertopia Corp., and Shaxon Enterprises Ltd. to sell our 49% interestdate are included in Capitalized Assets in the Burlington Joint Venturefinancial statements and the MMPR application number 10MMPR0610. The Burlington MMPR license application will continue in the application process under new ownership. Pursuant to the agreement, the joint venture received a non-refundable $10,000 deposit and is entitled to receive up to $1,500,000 in milestone payments upon the Burlington facility becoming licensed under the MMPR. All payments made pursuant to the Definitive Agreement would be divided 51% to Enertopia Corp. and 40% to our Company. Notwithstanding the foregoing, we can neither guarantee nor provide a meaningful time estimate regarding the grant of a production license for the Burlington facility.notes.

29


Item 3. Legal Proceedings

We know of no other material, existing or pending legal proceedings against our company, nor are we involved as a plaintiff in any other material proceeding or pending litigation. There are no other proceedings in which any of our directors, executive officers or affiliates, or any registered or beneficial stockholder, is an adverse party or has a material interest adverse to our interest.

Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures

None.

Not Applicable.

Page 33 of 83
Table of Contents

PART II

Item 5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

Our common shares are quoted on the OTCQBOTCQX under the symbol “LXRP.” Our common shares are also quoted on the Canadian Securities Exchange under the symbol “LXX”. The following quotations, obtained from Yahoo Finance, reflect the high and low bids for our common shares as quoted on the OTCQBOTCQX based on inter-dealer prices, without retail mark-up, mark-down or commission and may not represent actual transactions.

The high and low bid prices of our common stock for the periods indicated below are as follows:

OTC Bulletin Board(1)
   
Quarter EndedHighLow
November 30, 2014$0.12$0.04
Feb 28, 2015$0.12$0.07
May 31, 2015$0.225$0.076
August 31, 2015$0.27$0.13
November 30, 2015$0.235$0.111
Feb 28, 2016$0.28$0.08
May 31, 2016$0.169$0.08
August 31, 2016$0.154$0.08
November 30, 2016$0.35$0.11
February 28, 2017$0.699$0.20
May 31, 2017$0.625$0.27
August 31, 2017$0.43$0.27
(1)Over-the-counter market quotations reflect inter-dealer prices without retail mark- up, mark-down or commission, and may not represent actual transactions.

OTC Bulletin Board (1)

Quarter Ended

High

Low

November 30, 2016

$0.35

$0.11

February 28, 2017

$0.699

$0.20

May 31, 2017

$0.625

$0.27

August 31, 2017

$0.43

$0.27

November 30, 2017

$1.01

$0.32

February 28, 2018

$2.54

$0.82

May 31, 2018

$1.65

$0.78

August 31, 2018

$2.43

$1.50

November 30, 2018

$2.20

$0.98

February 28, 2019

$1.70

$0.75

May 31, 2019

$1.34

$0.81

August 31, 2019

$1.00

$0.60

(1) Over-the-counter market quotations reflect inter-dealer prices without retail mark-up, mark-down or commission, and may not represent actual transactions

As of November 14, 2017,5, 2019, there were 8056 holders of record of our common stock. As of such date, 69,020,01178,787,134 shares of common stock were issued and outstanding.

Our common shares are issued in registered form. Computershare, 2nd Floor, 510 Burrard Street, Vancouver, BC V6C 3B9 (Telephone: 604-661-9400; Facsimile: 604-661-9549) is the transfer agent for our common shares.

Nevada Agency and Trust Company, 50 West Liberty Street, Suite 880, Reno, Nevada 89501 (Telephone: 775.322.0626; Facsimile: 775.322.5623) is our registrar.

30


Dividend Policy

We have not paid any cash dividends on our common stock and have no present intention of paying any dividends on the shares of our common stock. Our current policy is to retain earnings, if any, for use in our operations and in the development of our business. Our future dividend policy will be determined from time to time by our board of directors.

Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities

Other than set out below, we did not sell any equity securities which were not registered under the Securities Act during the year ended August 31, 20172019 that were not otherwise disclosed on our quarterly reports on Form 10-Q or our current reports on Form 8-K filed during the year ended August 31, 2017.2019.

On October 11, 2016, pursuant to its agreement with Docherty Management Ltd.,

Page 34 of 83
Table of Contents

A summary of the Company issued 252,000 restricted common shares with a value of $35,760.activity is set out in the table below:

On October 11, 2016, pursuant to the Advisory Agreement, the Company issued 750,000

Type of Issuance

 

Number of Shares

 

 

Total Value

 

Warrant exercise(1)

 

 

1,626,513

 

 

 

796,122

 

Option exercise

 

 

430,000

 

 

 

66,250

 

Private placement

 

 

947,150

 

 

 

1,515,440

 

Per agreements(2)

 

 

250,000

 

 

 

234,500

 

 

 

 

3,253,663

 

 

 

2,612,312

 

(1)Includes 384,212 broker warrants exercised for gross proceeds of $191,742
(2) The Company awarded the restricted common shares as required by consulting contracts.

Warrants

Lexaria awarded 100,000 warrants with an exercise price of $0.14 per share$0.96 and terman expiration date of five years,May 21, 2021 to a vendor, pursuant to an investor relations contract. The warrants were valued at $52,817 and included in return for consulting services provided in August, September, and October. The Company recognizedinvestor relations.

During the fair value of $32,252 from 250,000 of such warrants for services received during the month of August 2016, during the yearperiod ended August 31, 2016, and during the three months ended November 30, 2016, further recognized $59,490 for the remaining 500,000 warrants issued in return for consulting services received during the months of September and October 2016.

The Company reached an agreement with a director to settle the outstanding amount pursuant to an advisory agreement (Note 14), through issuance of common shares of the Company. To settle the outstanding amount of $16,000 for four months to October 31, 2016,2019 the Company issued 114,286 shares of its common stock at a value of $0.14 per share, on October 11, 2016. On February 17, 2017, the Company issued a further 29,091 common shares to settle $16,000 of fees incurred during the four months ended February 28, 2017. A total of $8,000 of the $32,000 was recognized as consulting fees during the year ended August 31, 2016.

On October 27, 2016, the Company issued 56,250 shares of its common stock in settlement of $9,000, recognized within accounts payable and accrued liabilities as at August 31, 2016.

On November 1, 2016, the Company issued 500,00028,175 warrants to a consultant. Each warrant entitles the consultant to purchase one common share of the Company at a price of $0.31 per share with a term expiring on May 31, 2017. The Company recognized $48,313, representing the fair value of such warrants, during the nine months ended May 31, 2017.

During November, 2016, the Company provided to its warrant holders, an incentive for early exercise of their previously held warrants. Upon exercise of each warrant, in addition to the common shares of the Company, the warrant holders received a second warrant with identical terms to purchase one additional common share of the Company. The Company raised $737,508 from this early exercise warrant incentive program. A total of 3,245,000 warrants were exercised at a weighted average exercise price of $0.23 and the Company issued 3,245,000 common shares as well as 3,245,000 additional warrants to purchase common shares with an exercise price of $0.23 per share,$1.21 expiring on May 14, 2017. The fair value of these additionalOctober 3, 2019, 107,737 warrants was determined to be $298,777.

On January 10, 2017, the Company issued 500,000 warrants to a consultant. Each warrant entitles the consultant to purchase one common share of the Company at a price of $0.44 per share with a term$0.60 expiring on January 9, 2018. The Company recognized $112,725, representing the fair value of such warrants, during the nine months ended May 31, 2017.

On April 3, 2017, the Company closed its brokered private placement of 4,104,280 units2019. These warrants were valued at $22,579 and recorded as a price per Unit of $0.42 for total gross proceeds of $1,723,798. Each Unit consists of one common share and one-half of one Share purchase warrant. Each whole Warrant entitles the holder to acquire one common share of the Company at a price of $0.60 per Shareissue cost within additional paid in capital for a periodnet effect of 24 months. The Agents received a cash commission of seven percent of the gross proceeds and 287,300 compensation units exercisable for a period of 24 months at an exercise price of $0.42 consisting of one common share and one half share purchase warrant. Each whole compensation warrant is exercisable for one common share at an exercise price of $0.60 for a period of 24 months following closing.$Nil.

31


On May 31, 2017, the Company reached an agreement with a director to settle the outstanding amount pursuant to a advisory agreement (Note 14), through issuance of common shares of the Company. To settle the outstanding amount of $12,000 to May 31, 2017, the Company issued 35,294 shares of its common stock at a value of $0.34 per share, on May 31, 2017.

On June 22, 2017, pursuant to the agreement with Mr. Chris Bunka (Note 16), the Company issued 210,000 common shares valued at $61,950, for services rendered as the Chief Executive Officer of the Company.

On June 22, 2017, pursuant to the agreement with Mr. John Docherty (Note 16), the Company issued 210,000 common shares valued at $61,950, for services rendered as the President of the Company.

On August 25, 2017, the Company issued 307,500 shares of its common stock for the conversion of the convertible debt of $45,000 plus accrued interest of $1,125 (Note 10).

On August 25, 2017, the Company issued 32,433 shares of its common stock at $0.37 in settlement of $12,000, recognized within accounts payable and accrued liabilities as at August 25, 2017.

Equity Compensation Plan Information

We have no long-term incentive plans other than the stock option plans described below:below updated for issuable options as at August 31, 2019:

2007 Equity Plan

On April 25, 2007, our shareholders approved our 2007 Equity Incentive Stock Option Plan.

The 2007 Plan permits our company to issue up to 550,000the remaining 412,500 shares of our common stock to eligible employees and directors of our company upon the exercise of stock options granted under the 2010 Plan.company.

2010 Equity Compensation Plan

On February 26, 2010, our shareholders approved and adopted our 2010 equity incentive plan.

The 2010 Plan permits our Company to issue up to 1,980,000the remaining 1,512,500 shares of our common stock to directors, officers, employees and eligible consultants of our Company upon exercise of stock options granted under the 2010 plan.

2014 Stock Option Plan

On June 11, 2014, our shareholders approved and adopted our company’s 2014 Stock Option Plan which permits our company to grant up to an aggregate of 3,850,000the remaining 2,107,500 options to acquire shares of our common stock, to directors, officers, employees and consultants of our company.

Equity Incentive Plan

On June 20, 2019 our shareholders approved and adopted our Equity Incentive Plan whereby the board of directors may, from time to time, grant up to the remaining 7,838,713 stock options to directors, officers, employees, and consultants.

The Board may amend, subject to the approval of any regulatory authority whose approval is required, suspend or terminate this Plan or any portion thereof. No such amendment, suspension or termination shall alter or impair any outstanding unexercised Options or any rights without the consent of such Participant. If this Plan is suspended or terminated, the provisions of this Plan and any administrative guidelines, rules and regulations relating to this Plan shall continue in effect for the duration of such time as any Option remains outstanding.

32



Equity Compensation Plan Information







Plan category



Number of securities
to be issued upon
exercise of
outstanding options,
warrants and rights




Weighted-average
exercise price of
outstanding options,
warrants and rights
Number of securities
remaining available
for future issuance
under equity
compensation plans
(excluding securities
reflected in column
(a))
Equity compensation plans not approved by shareholdersNilNilNil
Equity compensation plans approved by shareholders:      
      2007 Equity 
      compensation plan
NilNil550,000
      2010 Equity 
      compensation plan
247,500$0.091,732,500
      2014 Stock Option Plan 
      approved by security holders
3,073,375$0.15776,625
Total3,320,875$0.153,059,125

Page 35 of 83
Table of Contents

It is the Company’s intent to terminate the 2007 Plan, the 2010 Plan and the 2014 Plan upon the expiration of all options currently issued and outstanding under such plans. All future option issuances shall be made under the Equity Incentive Plan.

Securities authorized for issuance under equity compensation plans

Plan Category

Number of securities to

be based upon exercise of

outstanding options,

warrants and rights

Weighed-average

exercise price of

outstanding options,

warrants and rights

Number of securities

remaining available for

future issuance under

equity compensation plan

[excluding securities

reflected in column (a)]

Equity compensation plans not approved by shareholders

Nil

Nil

Nil

Equity compensation plans approved by shareholders

 

2007 Equity compensation plan

300,000

$1.53

112,500

2010 Equity compensation plan

1,325,000

$1.53

187,500

2014 Stock Option Plan approved by security holders

1,990,000

$0.36

117,500

Equity Incentive Plan

1,388,000

$0.92

6,450,713

Total

5,003,000

$0.89

6,868,213

Convertible Securities

As of August 31, 2017,2019, we had outstanding options to purchase 3,320,0005,003,000 shares of our common stock exercisable between prices of $0.09$0.10 and $0.37. In December 2015 we experienced a 1.1 for 1.0 forward stock split that adjusted quantities and strike prices of all previously granted options. Those adjustments are reflected herein.$1.53.

On October 10, 2016,

During the year ended August 31, 2019, the Company pursuant to existing stock option plans, granted 250,000 stock options to directors, officers, employees and consultants that enable the option holders to purchase up to 350,000 common shares of the Company at a consultant for business advisory services. The exercise price of the$0.99 and 100,000 common shares at $0.81 for a period of five years, vesting immediately. Vesting stock options is $0.14 per share, vesting immediately and expiring on October 10, 2018.

On June 2, 2017, the Company granted 200,000 stock options to an officer of the Company. The exercise price of the stock options is $0.37 per share, vesting immediately and expiring five years from the date of grant.

On June 21, 2017, the Company granted 300,000 stock options to a consultant, 100,000 vesting annually for 3 years, with an exercise price of $0.295 and expiring five years from the date of grant. The companywere also granted 100,000to purchase: 440,000 common shares at $0.99, 390,000 at $1.27 (which were subsequently cancelled and re-issued at $0.99), 240,000 at $1.06, 30,000 at $1.16, 48,000 at $0.96 and 450,000 at $0.81 that vest over three years. The vested options to consultants vesting immediately with an exercise price of $0.295were valued at $368,115 and expiring five years from the date of grant.included in consulting expense and R&D. Vesting options granted in a prior period were valued at $22,197 and included in consulting expense.

Purchases of Equity Securities by the Issuer and Affiliated Purchasers

We did not purchase any of our shares of common stock or other securities during our fiscal year ended August 31, 2017.2019.

Item 6. Selected Financial Data

As

Not applicable. The Company qualifies as a “smaller reporting company”, we are“Smaller Reporting Company” and, accordingly, this Item and the related disclosure is not required to provide the information required by this Item.required.

33


Page 36 of 83
Table of Contents

Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

The following discussion should be read in conjunction with our audited consolidated financial statements and the related notes that appear elsewhere in this annual report. The following discussion contains forward-looking statements that reflect our plans, estimates and beliefs. Our actual results could differ materially from those discussed in the forward lookingforward-looking statements. Factors that could cause or contribute to such differences include but are not limited to; those discussed below and elsewhere in this annual report, particularly in the section entitled "Risk Factors"“Risk Factors”.

Our audited financial statements are stated in United States Dollars and are prepared in accordance with United States Generally Accepted Accounting Principles.

Plan of Operation

During the next twelve monthtwelve-month period (beginning September 1, 2017)2019), we intend to:

·continue sales and marketing efforts for consumer product lines

·pursue technology out-licensing opportunities for our patented DehydraTECH technology. This will be focused first primarily on the cannabinoid and nicotine sectors, and will evolve as time allows for completed R&D in other sectors, to the NSAID, and vitamin sectors;

·identify and secure sources of equity and/or debt financing for intellectual property pursuit and maintenance, R&D, and consumer product formulation and marketing;

Our plans beyond fiscal 20182021 are dependent upon our ability to obtain sufficient capital through equity capital or other and by revenues generation to execute. During the previous year we did raise sufficient capital to fulfill all our plans. Without sufficient capital, our plans will change, and could change materially. We anticipate that we will incur up to the following operating expenses during this period:

Estimated Funding Required During the 12 Months beginning September 1, 2017

Expense

Estimated Funding Required During the 12 Months beginning September 1, 2019

AmountEstimated

Expense

Amount

($)

Estimated Completion/Due

Date

Date

Research and Development of additional products

70,00012 months

Research and Development (General)

800,000

70,000

800,000

12 months

12 months

Patent applications and trademark

250,000

300,000

12 months

Marketing and Sales

200,000

12 months

Consulting Fees (~50% is(-50% in officers and directors)

900,000

1,200,000

12 months

Wages and Salaries

575,000

12 months

Professional feesFees

160,000

12 months

Rent

20,000

45,000

12 months

Other general administrative expenses (including travel, insurance, conferences, and fees)

300,000

12 months

Interest Expense

10,000

12 months

Total

2,710,000

3,660,000

 

34


12 Month Outlook for Current Product Line, Product Development & Design, Patents

As at August 31, 2017,2019, we had a working capital surplus of $2,703,148$1,634,322 and cash on hand of $2,533,337.$1,285,147. We therefore estimate that we will be required to raiserequire approximately $nil$2.5 million in cash to finance our planned expenditures for the 12 months beginning September 1, 2017.2019. In the uncertain event that we are unable to raise sufficient funds to execute our current business plan, or in the uncertain event that all of our debt obligations become due, we will be required to scale back our operations to prioritize immediate and necessary expenses, inshifting portions of our plan into our longer term planning intofor fiscal 2019.2021. We estimate our minimum necessary expenses for the year to be roughly $2.5 million. These necessary expenses include professional fees, wages and general and administrative expenses necessary to satisfy our public reporting requirements.

Page 37 of 83
Table of Contents

Our business strategy involves several elements. We intend to prioritize our revenue generating efforts in 2017/182020/21 on technology licensing in the nicotine, hemp and cannabinoid sectors, with a secondary focus on our consumer food products enriched with full spectrum hemp oil. Revenues from existing licensees are anticipated to increase based on ongoing usage fees as licensees begin or ramp up products or contracted minimum requirements become due.

Our patented technology was developed to aid absorption and bioavailability of certain “payload” molecules, including cannabinoids such as cannabidiol (CBD)CBD and tetrahydrocannabinol (THC).THC. CBD is not psychoactive and may have desirable qualities, and is found in plant species such as hemp, cannabis, and Echinacea.Echinacea, is not psychoactive and may have desirable qualities. Our technology appears to improve absorption and bioavailability of CBD into human epi-intestinal cells. We are developing a line of food products fortified with full spectrum hemp oil that contains cannabinoids such as CBD, but contains less than 0.3% THC. Because of the low amounts of THC, and because the hemp oil is derived from legally importedlegal hemp, our research into the products areis legal under FederalUS federal law.

We first began selling trial amounts of ViPova™ViPova branded black tea fortified with hemp oil and utilizing our technology, in January 2015. In August 2015 weand added six newadditional flavours over time. We currently sell three flavors of tea to expand the brand’s reach.ViPova tea. Sales of these products have been modest but are expected to improve in the long term.

We also began offering our first coffee and hot chocolate also fortified with full spectrum hemp oil, and also under the ViPova™ViPova brand. Together, tea, coffee and hot chocolate comprise all our product offerings under the ViPova™ViPova brand, despite modest changes to flavors or perhaps packaging, etc. Offering a variety of self-made beverages to the consumers helps us to establish the ViPova™ViPova brand and may also help us to develop relationships with retail distributors who are less likely to place orders from manufacturers that can only offer a single product.

Generating meaningful revenue from product sales will be challenging and will rely in part on our ability to achieve widespread retail distribution access.access, which to date we have failed to achieve. We are also investigating the possibility of generating sales from international markets, in those locations where hemp oil fortified foods are permissible by law.

ViPova™

ViPova branded products are owned by our 51%-ownedwholly owned Poviva Tea LLCCorp subsidiary. As of October 2017 Lexaria acquired 100% of Poviva Tea LLC.

While the ViPova™ViPova line is focused on a “coffee house” experience, the “Lexaria Energy”Lexaria Energy line is focused on athletic performance and active lifestyle needs. The first Lexaria Energy product iswas believed to be unique or nearly so: a protein energy bar utilizing our technology to fortify it with full spectrum hemp oil. We first offered the Lexaria Energy Bar for sale in November 2015.2015, but it was since discontinued due to the complexities in locating reliable manufacturing. TurboCBDand ChrgD+ products have also been publicly released demonstrating additional product formats that benefit from our patented DehydraTECH technology’s advantages in capsules and powdered form for ready to drink beverages respectively.

Lexaria Energy, TurboCBDand ChrgD+ branded products are owned 100% by Lexaria Bioscience Corp.

A manufacturing facility was contracted to produce the Lexaria Energy bar in 2015. Recipes have evolved and at the time of this report the Company had no inventories of protein bars to be offered for sales and was negotiating for a suitable 2016/17 manufacturing facility and prices.

Our strategy wasis to encourage online sales via a dedicated website,websites, and also to encourage fitness enthusiasts to become aware of the Lexaria Energy Bars at fitness clubs and gyms, which they are likely to frequent. We did pursue traditional grocery store, convenience store, andspecialty stores, roadside store and wholesale distribution channels in 2016 with some success but limited due to our lack of an establishedchannels. To facilitate distribution, system.we have third-party fulfillment centers that process and ship orders.

35


It is our intention, subject to sufficient funding being available, to provide R&D to develop additional fitness-style products in 2017 under the Lexaria Energy brand,our brands, such as protein powders for shakes or smoothies, and protein energy drinks.drinks, mouth melts, and intermediary materials that clientele can purchase as a raw material to use in making their own products. We are also pursuing other product development and expect to launch new products.

Through our product development we have communicated to the industry the versatility of our technology in specific CPG formats and we believe this strategy has been successful in assisting us in technology licensing discussions with potential new clients. We believe the range of products available and under development are sufficient to prepare for revenue growth and potentially profitable long termlong-term operations if we are able to generate sufficient consumer demand and obtain sufficiently widespread retail distribution locations.business clientele demand.

Meanwhile, our business strategy contains a second element that we believe will be more impactful to future corporate growth that involves the further development and out-licensing of our intellectual property of molecule delivery that enhances bioactivity or absorption.

Page 38 of 83
Table of Contents

At this time we are not planning to offer for sale any products containing THC in quantities higher than 0.3%. However, we envisionare continuing to expand the number of licensees licensing our technology to companiesthat are legally state-licensed to offer THC products in the states or international jurisdictions where they do business. We also plan to license our technology to other companies for the delivery of molecules other than THC or cannabinoids.cannabinoids, such as nicotine that we have licensed to Altria Ventures Inc., an indirect wholly-owned subsidiary of Altria Group, Inc. Our October 31, 2017 announcement of the USPTO Notice of Allowance for our first patent granted and the subsequent 15 granted patents of our technology related to new molecule groups, along with our ongoing patent filing and grants, may enhance our ability to successfully pursue this initiative during fiscal 2018.2020.

We will attemptcontinue to communicate the benefits of our technology to potential licensing partners, i.e. with higher absorption levels a manufacturer could perhaps infuse smaller amounts of active molecules into a product, thus reducing their manufacturing input costs.costs, to provide higher bioavailability with the dosing limits being imposed or contemplated in many jurisdictions, to infuse beverages while masking the flavor and smell of the active molecules, and predictable delivery times. We believe thisthese to abe meaningful competitive advantageadvantages that may lead to the potential to generate licensing revenue, and will pursue these opportunities within the THC marketcannabinoids, nicotine and other bioactive molecular markets both within the USA and also internationally, in those locations where it isthey are legal and regulated by government.

We wouldwill not ourselves be sellingsell any THC products – we would only be licensinglicense technology to already-licensed participants in valid jurisdictions. We expect a low number of licensees initially and currently have onenine revenue generating agreementagreements with such a licenseelicensees and additional letters of intent and negotiations with other potential licensees. We do not sell any nicotine products and do not intend to – however our joint venture partner may elect to utilize our technology in products containing nicotine for sale to consumers in the USA or internationally.

Subject to budgetary availability, we also plan to conduct additional in vitro and in vivo studies testing the absorption of some or all of the molecules named within our patent applications – CBD, NSAIDs, Vitamins, PDE5 inhibitors and Nicotine – to substantiate the effectiveness of our invention.technology. More than simply satisfying scientific curiosity, successful tests could lead to increased awareness and acceptance of our technology as a meaningful method by which to deliver some or all of the named molecules more effectively than their current delivery methods. Therefore, absorption tests could become an important element leading towards higher rates of acceptance of our technology licensing initiatives.

We will pursue technology licensing opportunities as a method of generating highly profitable revenue streams over long periods of time. In addition, while oneeight of our patent applications hasUS patents and eight of our Australian patents have been granted byto date, we have multiple other applications filed in the USPTOUS and another patent application has generated a Notice of Allowance, our remaining patent applications have not yet been granted.around the world. It is not possible to forecast with certainty when, or if, our remaining patent pendingspatents pending will become granted patents. But if our remaining patent applications do become granted patents, our ability to generate meaningful license revenue from our intellectual property may increase in a very short period of time.

We will continue to pursue our remaining patents pending as vigorously as we are able, since the successful granting of more of those applications could lead to material increases in shareholder value. We are pursuing patent protection in more than 40 countries around the world.

36


Results of Operations for our Year Ended August 31, 20172019 and August 31, 20162018

Our net loss and comprehensive loss for the year ended August 31, 2017, for the year ended August 31, 2016 and the changes between those periods for the respective items are summarized as follows:

  Year Ended  Year Ended    
  August 31,  August 31,    
  2017  2016  Change 
  $  $  $ 
Revenue 63,639  40,718  22,921 
General and administrative 1,963,354  1,272,352  691,002 
Interest expense 6,015  2,250  3,765 
Consulting fees 1,017,872  565,543  452,329 
Professional Fees 210,297  133,860  76,437 
Net loss (1,929,465) (1,277,249) (652,216)

 

 

YEAR ENDED

 

 

YEAR ENDED

 

 

 

 

 

 

August 31

 

 

August 31

 

 

 

 

 

 

2019

 

 

2018

 

 

Change

 

Revenue

 

$222,610

 

 

$433,287

 

 

$(210,677)

General and administrative

 

 

4,358,130

 

 

 

7,017,289

 

 

 

(2,659,159)

Consulting fees & Employees

 

 

1,777,934

 

 

 

5,332,398

 

 

 

(3,554,464)

Legal and professional

 

 

670,863

 

 

 

289,062

 

 

 

381,801

 

Net Loss

 

$(4,158,413)

 

$(6,609,186)

 

$2,450,773

 

Revenue

Licensing revenues of $198,000 represent the majority of the $63,639 in revenues during the year ended August 31, 2017. 2019 and reflect delays in usage fee revenues from existing licensees in Canada waiting for approval from Health Canada on products, and other licensees initiating or ramping up their production. Revenue was primarily based on new licence agreements entered into recognising the IP Territory Licensing fee, and existing licenses generating usage fees. Increasing ongoing usage fees are expected as licensees begin or ramp up products or contracted minimum requirements become due.

Page 39 of 83
Table of Contents

Two years ago the Company had one Licensee and today we have nine Licensees. The territory fees consist of IP licensing fees for the transfer of the Technology at the signing of definitive agreements for the DehydraTECH technology. The additional Licensing fees include payments due upon transfer of the technology and installment payments that are receivable within 12 months (Note 7). We are pleased that we have signed additional licenses and are looking toward revenues increasing during fiscal 2020 with the legalization of edible products in Canada expected during October 2019 and the potential for licensee product launches early in calendar 2020 in that country. Our additional and expanded licenses in the US are anticipated to generate ongoing usage fee revenues based on contracted minimums or based on licensee sales starting during our fiscal 2020.

We have made progress in signing more corporate licensees than ever before in our corporate history, but most of these licensees are small start up companies that continue to present operational risk to us. We continue to attempt to work with larger more established companies to encourage them to adopt our technology, but the markets have been slow to adopt our technology, notwithstanding our new corporate relationship with a Fortune 500 company in the nicotine industry.

Consumer product sales revenues were lowerremain low due to ongoing challenges in securing expansive distribution opportunities, third-party production challenges, inconsistent federal vs. state or local regulations, and payment processing changes. Total licensing revenues increased as they were included on a pro-rated basis and also included additional contracted fees. Licensing revenues were recognized on a pro-rated basis overThe Company continues to pursue more widespread distribution possibilities which have the term of the licensing agreement as the Company is requiredpotential to provide additional support services during the term and is in a very early stage of this revenue cycle to identify a vendor-specific objective evidence of fair value of such services. Additional contracted fees were included as earned. As of August 31 2017 the company had received all of the pre-defined Licensing payments to August 31 2017 for a cash receipts of $50,000 of Licensing fees and $20,392 of additional fees corresponding to the areas under the license agreement where the licensee has been active to-date. unlock more significant consumer product revenues.

During the year ended August 31, 2017, $25,4172019, our revenues were derived within the following categories: $198,000 (2018 $415,183) of the $50,000 was included (2016 $7,500) on a pro-rated basis and $20,392 (2016 $NIL) of additional fees as licensing revenue for a total of $45,809 inintellectual property licensing revenue and $17,830$24,610 (2018 $18,104) in product and other revenues.

As fiscal 20172019 came to a close, hemp oil fortified foods, and hemp seed products continued gaining consumer acceptance and provide a reason to believe that sales could increase. In addition, legislative trends in America and in many nations around the world such as Canada and the UK are supportive of additional opportunities in the hemp-based foods and supplements sector. Those trends shouldcould support higher potential consumer product sales. Release of the ChrgD+ product was successful, but sales were limited due to ongoing payment processing issues outside of the Company’s control, and due to our not being successful in obtaining widespread retail distribution channels.

For 2020 the Company expects to continue to derive the majority of its revenues from technology licensing to third parties noting that IP territory fees are recognized when new definitive license agreements occur and IP usage fees are dependent upon our licensees’ opportunity to implement the technology pursuant to applicable regulatory approvals. Canadian regulatory approval for ingestible products was originally scheduled for October 17, 2019, but there are indications that actual individual product approvals required from Health Canada may delay licensee product launches into 2020 in that country. At August 31, 2015 the Company had zero technology licensing agreements entered. By August 31, 2016 we had entered several LOI’s or definitive agreements related to technology out-licensing. During the period ended August 31, 2019 we entered into nine active licensing agreements that are expected to generate additional revenue from the payment of usage fees as the licensees’ production and sales occur. It is the Company’s view its eight US patents granted and eight Australian patents granted along with its expanding patent portfolio is a positive step in enabling the generation of more significant revenues during fiscal 2020. At the time of this report the Company has entered more than 10 formal letters of intent or definitive agreements and is negotiating more.

We do not expect that all of the letters of intent into which we enter will result in definitive agreements with paying customers and cannot predict how many will. We believe that strengthening and expanding our intellectual property portfolio and conducting supportive R&D will jointly contribute to strengthening revenue prospects.

General and Administrative

Our general and administrative expenses decreased by $2,659,158 during the year ended August 31, 2019. The decrease in our general and administrative expenses was largely due to non-cash expenses related to valuation of grants for service and share-based payments required by contracts included in fiscal 2018. Increases during fiscal 2019 included expanded patent applications, R&D, IR programs and the addition of employees for a total of $1,061,125, which includes $368,115 of non-cash compensation and $58,243 increase in depreciation related to new facilities and equipment.

Interest Expense

Interest expense for the year ended August 31, 2019 was $Nil (2018 $Nil). The Company has no debt at this time other than month-to-month receivables.

Page 40 of 83
Table of Contents

Consulting fees

Our consulting fees decreased by $3,887,663 primarily due to the non-cash payments for services included in fiscal 2018. Our executives are typically consultants and costs associated with those agreements comprise a significant portion of our consulting fees expense (Note 16).

Legal and Professional Fees

Our professional fees increased by $381,801 to $670,863 during the year primarily due to ongoing patent and trademark filings, consultations on licensing agreements, and other advisory services. Although we always try to minimize expenses, we consider increases in costs related to patent and trademark work to reflect positive progress in executing our business plan. We recognize certain legal fees, tax advice fees, and accounting services all as “Professional Fees.”

Liquidity and Financial Condition

 

 

August 31

 

 

August 31

 

Working Capital

 

2019

 

 

2018

 

Current assets

 

$1,818,829

 

 

$2,284,051

 

Current liabilities

 

$(184,507)

 

$(43,640)

Net Working Capital

 

$1,634,322

 

 

$2,240,411

 

The Company’s working capital balance decrease during the year was limited due to exercises of outstanding options and warrants and the private placement (Note 13) completed during the year. The Company maintained a positive and strong working capital position throughout the year.

 

 

August 31

 

 

August 31

 

Cash Flows

 

2019

 

 

2018

 

Cash flows (used in) provided by operating activities

 

$(3,005,555)

 

$(2,517,979)

Cash flows (used in) provided by investing activities

 

$(769,165)

 

$(155,399)

Cash flows (used in) provided by financing activities

 

$3,332,683

 

 

$1,867,224

 

Decrease in cash

 

$(442,037)

 

$(806,153)

Operating Activities

Net cash used in operating activities was $3,005,555 for the year compared with cash used in operating activities of $2,517,979 during the same period in 2018. This difference was largely due to the increased costs pertaining to consulting, advertising and promotion, patent and trademark related filings, legal advisory services, new employees, research and development, and travel.

Investing Activities

Net cash used in investing activities was $769,165 (2018 $155,399) for the year due to the Company’s cost incurred related to its patent applications $122,982 and our new office space and equipment (Note 10) $646,183.

Financing Activities

Net cash provided from financing activities was $3,332,683 during the year ended August 31, 2019 compared to net cash provided of $1,867,224 during the same period in 2018.

Page 41 of 83
Table of Contents

Results of Operations for our Year Ended August 31, 2018 and August 31, 2017

Our net loss and comprehensive loss for the year ended August 31, 2018, for the year ended August 31, 2017 and the changes between those periods for the respective items are summarized as follows:

 

 

Year Ended

August 31, 2018

$

 

 

Year Ended

August 31, 2017

$

 

 

Change

$

 

Revenue

 

 

433,287

 

 

 

63,639

 

 

 

369,648

 

General and administrative

 

 

7,017,289

 

 

 

1,963,354

 

 

 

5,053,935

 

Interest expense

 

 

-

 

 

 

6,015

 

 

 

(6,015)

Consulting fees

 

 

5,332,398

 

 

 

1,017,872

 

 

 

4,314,526

 

Legal and Professional fees

 

 

289,062

 

 

 

210,297

 

 

 

78,765

 

Net Loss

 

 

(6,609,186)

 

 

(1,929,465)

 

 

(4,679,721)

Revenue

Licensing revenues represent the majority of the $433,287 in revenues during the year ended August 31, 2018 and illustrate a significant gain from the previous year. Revenue increases were primarily based on new licence agreements entered into recognising the IP Territory Licensing fee and they are expected to generate future ongoing IP Usage Licensing fees.

One year ago the Company had one Licensee and today we have five Licensees. The Territory fees consist of IP licensing fees for the transfer of the Technology with the signing of definitive agreements for the DehydraTECH™ technology with: the Cannfections Group Inc. for a 7-year term for infused chocolates and candies to be developed and sold in Canada and internationally, NeutriSci International Inc. for a 2-year term for the manufacturing and sale of CBD based products, Biolog, Inc. for a 5-year term to manufacture food and beverage infused products to be sold in the United States, GP Holdings LLC for infused beverages and topical skin products for a 5-year term (subsequent to August 31, 2018 we cancelled this contract due to non-performance), Nuka Enterprises LLC for their 1906 Chocolates for 10 years renewing from their chocolate only 2 year contract to now include chocolate, candies, beverages, capsules and pills, and topical creams, and Hill Street Beverage Company for a 5-year term for infused alcohol-free beverages in Canada. The additional Licensing fees include payments due upon transfer of the Technology and installment payments that are receivable within 12 months (Note 7). We are pleased that our licensing revenues are increasing in scale and across a larger number of customers although they have not grown as quickly as anticipated.

Consumer product sales remain low due to challenges in securing expansive distribution opportunities, 3rd-party production challenges, inconsistent federal vs. state or local regulations, and payment processing changes. The Company continues to pursue more widespread distribution possibilities which have the potential to unlock more significant consumer product revenues.

During the year ended August 31, 2018, our revenues were derived within the following categories: $415,183 (2017 $45,809) (an 806% increase year over year) of licensing revenue and $18,104 (2017 $17,830) (a 1.5% increase year over year) in product and other revenues.

As fiscal 2018 came to a close, hemp oil fortified foods, and hemp seed products continued gaining consumer acceptance and provide a reason to believe that sales could increase. In addition, legislative trends in America and in many nations around the world such as Canada and the UK are supportive of additional opportunities in the hemp-based foods and supplements sector. Those trends could support higher potential consumer product sales. Release of the TurboCBDTM product was successful but sales were limited by changes to payment processing services outside of the Company’s control. At the time of this report the Company had extinguished its supplies of certain products like protein bars and the lack of inventory was also a negative impact on consumer product sales potential.

For 20182019 the Company expects to continue to derive ever larger proportionsthe majority of its revenues from technology licensing to third parties.parties noting that IP Territory fees are recognized when new definitive license agreements occur and IP Usage fees are dependent up on licensees opportunity to implements the technology based upon regulatory approval. Canadian regulatory approval for ingestible products is anticipated within 12 months of the October 17, 2018 legalization of recreational cannabis in that country. At August 31, 2015 the Company had zero technology licensing agreements entered. By August 31, 2016 we had entered several LOI’s or definitive agreements related to technology out-licensing. During the period ended August 31, 2018 we have entered into six new licensing agreements that increased our IP licensing revenue and we expect additional revenue will be generated from the licensees utilizing the technology in their processes from the usage fees as their production and sales occur. It is the Company’s view that the December 9, 2017, grant of patent US 9839612 B2, and the grants of US 9972680 B2 and US 9974739 B2 during May 2018 and its expanding patent portfolio is a positive step in enabling the generation of more significant revenues during fiscal 2018. At the time of this report the Company has entered more than 10 formal letters of intent or definitive agreements and is negotiating more. The Company also has formed a joint venture to develop, produce, and sell a line of healthy edible cannabinoid products using our patented technology. It is the Company’s view that the October 2017 notice of allowance of its expanding patent portfolio will beis a positive step in enabling the generation of more significant revenues during 2018.2019.

Page 42 of 83
Table of Contents

We do not expect that all of the Letters of Intent into which we enter will result in definitive agreements with paying customers and cannot predict how many will. We believe that strengthening and expanding our intellectual property portfolio and conducting supportive R&D will jointly contribute to strengthening revenue prospects.

General and Administrative

Our general and administrative expenses increased by $691,002$5,053,935 during the year ended August 31, 2017.2018. The increase in our general and administrative expenses was largely due to non-cash expenses related to valuation of grants for service and share based payments required by contracts. The total of non-cash based payments for the period was $4,446,565.

If this non-cash expense is subtracted from the total expenses increase, then our G&A expenses increased by only $607,370. Contemplating the expenses other than the non-cash related items, actual cash expenses are in line with our expected increasing R&D, patent and trademark filings, and brand awareness requirements. The increases in executing budgeted work. Examples are manywork included significant increases in R&D for execution of studies supporting our patent filings, such as the in vivo Nicotine and include additional consultants; increasingEuropean human studies, for a year on year increase of $438,679. Ongoing increases to legal feesexpenses, year on year of $152,852 for our world-wide patent and trademark filings, new product developmentas well as increases to our advertising and launch,promotions to engage our markets to generate awareness and more. However roughly two-thirds of the increase included in the G&A total is $258,406 valuation of warrants issued for services and $207,660 of share issuance for contracts and in settlement of services recognized in accounts payable regarding contractors. Significantlicensing clients, year on year $280,024. Fiscal 2019 expects to continue these increases are expected during fiscal 2018 executing the budgeted scientific testing and research and development.based on available funding.

37


Interest Expense

Interest expense for the year ended August 31, 20172018 was $6,015 (2016 $2,250)$Nil (2017 $6,015). The increasedecrease was primarily due to the issuanceconversion as of aAugust 31, 2017 of the convertible debt and related payments. Asextinguishment of the year ended August 31, 2017 we eliminated our long-term loan and the convertibleloan. The Company has no debt was converted.at this time other than month-to-month receivables.

Consulting fees

Our consulting fees increased during the year ended August 31, 20172018 due to the involvement of additional consultants, including the appointmentcontract updates and non-cash payments for services of our interim CFO.$4,446,565. Our executives are typically hired and compensated as consultants and costs associated with those agreements comprise the largest majority of our consulting fees expense.expense (Note 16) and thus our Consulting Expenses category includes certain fees that might otherwise be recognized under wages and salaries.

Professional Fees

Our professional fees increased by $76,437$164,318 to $289,062 during fiscal 20172018 primarily due to increases in patent and trademark filings but were offset by some reductions dueof $152,852, with the balance primarily being increases in tax and other accounting services. Although we always try to the appointment ofminimize expenses, we consider increases in costs related to patent and trademark work to reflect positive progress in executing our interim CFO reducing financial report preparationbusiness plan. We recognize certain legal fees, from third party service providers. These efficiencies reduced outside professional fees.tax advice fees, and accounting services all as “Professional Fees.”

Liquidity and Financial Condition

 August 31  August 31 
Working Capital 2017  2016 

 

August 31,

2018

$

 

 

August 31,

2017

$

 

 $  $ 
Current assets 2,795,495  510,166 

 

2,284,051

 

2,795,495

 

Current liabilities 92,347  433,881 

 

43,640

 

 

92,347

 

Working capital balance 2,703,148  76,285 

Net Working Capital

 

2,240,411

 

 

2,703,148

 

Page 43 of 83
Table of Contents

The Company’s working capital balance increaseddecrease during the year ended August 31, 2017 as2018, was limited due to the ongoing exercises of outstanding options and warrants providing significant incoming funds. The Company maintained a result of its financing activities. The warrant conversions from previous equity financings,positive and the new equity financings during fiscal 2017 resulted in a significant improvement in ourstrong working capital position of $2,626,863 compared tothroughout the year, earlier period.which is slightly weaker at year-end.

     Year Ended 
  August 31  August 31 
Cash flows 2017  2016 
  $  $ 
Cash flows (used in) provided by operating activities (1,545,909) (660,856)
Cash flows (used in) provided by investing activities (9,699) (20,102)
Cash flows (used in) provided by financing activities 3,995,536  514,292 
Increase (decrease) in cash 2,439,928  (166,666)

 

 

Year Ended

 

Cash Flows

 

August 31,

2018

$

 

 

August 31,

2017

$

 

Cash flows (used in) provided by operating activities

 

 

(2,517,978)

 

 

(1,545,909)

Cash flows (used in) provided by investing activities

 

 

(155,399)

 

 

(9,699)

Cash flows (used in) provided by financing activities

 

 

1,867,224

 

 

 

3,995,536

 

Increase (decrease) in cash

 

 

(806,153)

 

 

2,439,928

 

Operating Activities

Net cash used in operating activities was $1,545,909$2,514,332 for the year ended August 31, 20172018 compared with cash used in operating activities of $660,856$1,545,909 during the same period in 2016.2017. This difference was largely due to the increased costs pertaining to consulting, advertising and promotion, patent and trademark related filings, research and development, and travel.

Investing Activities

Net cash used in investing activities was $9,699 (2016 $20,102)$155,399 (2017 $9,699) for the year ended August 31, 20172018 is primarily due to the Company’s cost incurred related to its patent related applications.applications $85,399 and the purchase of the remaining 49% of Poviva LLC of $70,000.

38


Financing Activities

Net cash provided from financing activities was $3,995,536$1,863,577 during the year ended August 31, 20172018 compared to net cash provided of $514,292$3,995,536 during the same period in 2016.2017. During fiscal 2017,2018, the Company closed a brokered private placementdid not pursue additional financing, instead utilizing existing funding and had significant warrant exercises. The Company also repaid its loan due to our Chief Executive Officer. We raised $1,635,242 from equity private placements $177,262 from optionongoing exercises of stock options and $2,233,032 from warrant exercises in fiscal 2017 compared to $419,292 of equity from private placements and $95,000 in debt during fiscal 2016.only.

Contractual Obligations

As a “smaller reporting company”, we are not required to provide tabular disclosure obligations.

Going Concern

The Company’s consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (U.S. GAAP) applicable to a going concern, which contemplates the realization of assets and the satisfaction of liabilities and commitments in the normal course of business. The Company has a net loss attributable to its common shareholders of $1,869,277$4,099,420 for the year ended August 31, 2017 (2016: $1,214,773)2019 (2018: $6,598,843) and at August 31, 20172019 had a deficit accumulated since its inception of $13,169,939 (2016: $11,300,662)$23,868,202 (2018: $19,768,782). The Company has a working capital balance of $2,703,148$1,634,322 as at August 31, 2017 (2016: $76,285)2019 (2018: $2,240,411). The Company requires additional funds to maintain its operations and developments beyond fiscal 2018.2020. Management’s plans in this regard are to raise equity and debt financing as required, but there is no certainty that such financing will be available or that it will be available at acceptable terms. The outcome of these matters cannot be predicted at this time.

 

Page 44 of 83
Table of Contents

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

We have no off-balance sheet arrangements that have or are reasonably likely to have a current or future effect on our financial condition, changes in financial condition, revenues or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources that are material to stockholders.

Critical Accounting Policies

The discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations are based upon our consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with the accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.America (US GAAP). Preparing consolidated financial statements requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenue, and expenses. These estimates and assumptions are affected by management’s application of accounting policies. We believe that understanding the basis and nature of the estimates and assumptions involved with the aspects of our financial statements are critical to an understanding of our financial statements as more particularly described in Note 3 to our audited annual consolidated financial statements included herein.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In May 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (the “FASB”) issued a new standard related to the revenue recognition. Under the new standard, recognition of revenue occurs when a customer obtains control of promised goods or services in an amount that reflects the consideration which the entity expects to receive in exchange for those goods or services. In addition, the standard requires disclosure of the nature, amount, timing, and uncertainty of revenue and cash flows arising from contracts with customers. The FASB has recently issued several amendments to the standards, including clarification on the accounting for licenses of intellectual property and identifying performance obligations.

The guidance permits two methods of adoption: retrospectively to each prior reporting period presented (full retrospective method), or retrospectively with the cumulative effect of initially applying the guidance recognized at the date of initial application (the cumulative catch-up transition method). The Company will apply the full retrospective approach to adopt the standard but does not anticipate that this standard will have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.

39


In July 2015, FASB issued ASU 2015-11, Simplifying the Measurement of Inventory (“ASU 2015-11”). ASU 2015-11 requires that an entity measure inventory at the lower of cost and net realizable value. This ASU does not apply to inventory measured using last-in, first-out methodology. ASU 2015-11 is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016, including interim periods within that reporting period. The Company does not expect the new standard to have a significant impact on its consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

In November 2015, the FASB issued guidance that requires companies to classify all deferred tax assets or liabilities as noncurrent on the balance sheet rather than separately disclosing deferred taxes as current and noncurrent. This standard is effective for the Company beginning on September 1, 2017 and can be applied either prospectively or retrospectively to all periods presented upon adoption. The standard is not expected to have any impact on the Company’s financial statements.

In January 2016, FASB issued a new standard to amend certain aspects of recognition, measurement, presentation, and disclosure of financial instruments. Most prominent among the amendments is the requirement for changes in fair value of equity investments, with certain exceptions, to be recognized through profit or loss rather than other comprehensive income. The new standard will be effective for the Company beginning September 1, 2018. The standard is not expected to have any impact on the Company’s financial statements.

In February 2016 FASB issued ASU No. 2016-02, Leases (Topic 842) which supersedes FASB ASC Topic 840, Leases (Topic 840) and provides principles for the recognition, measurement, presentation, and disclosure of leases for both lessees and the lessors. The new standard requires the lessees to apply a dual approach, classifying leases as either finance or operating leases based on the principle of whether or not the lease is effectively a financed purchase by the lessee. The classification will determine whether lease expense is recognized based on an effective interest method or on a straight-line basis over the term of the lease, respectively. A lessee is also required to record a right-of-use asset and a lease liability for all leases with a term of greater than twelve months regardless of classification. Leases with a term of twelve months or less will be accounted for similar to existing guidance for operating leases. The standard is effective for annual and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2018, with early adoption permitted upon issuance. When adopted, the Company does not expect this guidance to have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.

In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-09, Compensation-Stock Compensation (Topic 718), Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting. Under ASU 2016-09, companies will no longer record excess tax benefits and certain tax deficiencies in additional paid in capital (“APIC”). Instead, they will record all excess tax benefits and tax deficiencies as income tax expense or benefit in the income statement and the APIC pools will be eliminated. In addition, ASU 2016-09 eliminates the requirement that excess tax benefits be realized before companies can recognize them. ASU 2016-09 also requires companies to present excess tax benefits as an operating activity on the statement of cash flows rather than as a financing activity. Furthermore, ASU 2016-09 will increase the amount an employer can withhold to cover income taxes on awards and still qualify for the exception to liability classification for shares used to satisfy the employer’s statutory income tax withholding obligation. An employer with a statutory income tax withholding obligation will now be allowed to withhold shares with the fair value up to the amount of taxes owed using the maximum statutory rate in the employee’s applicable jurisdiction(s). ASU 2016-09 requires a company to classify the cash paid to a tax authority when shares are withheld to satisfy its statutory income tax withholding obligation as a financing activity on the statement of cash flows. Under current U.S. GAAP, it is not specified how these cash flows should be classified. In addition, companies will now have to elect whether to account for forfeitures on share-based payments by (1) recognizing forfeiture awards as they occur or (2) estimating the number of awards expected to be forfeited and adjusting the estimate when it is likely to change, as in currently required. The amendments of this ASU are effective for reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016, with early adoption permitted but all of the guidance must be adopted in the same period. The Company is currently assessing the impact the standard will have on its consolidated financial statements.

In June 2016, the FASB issued a new standard to replace the incurred loss impairment methodology in current U.S. GAAP with a methodology that reflects expected credit losses and requires consideration of a broader range of reasonable and supportable information to inform credit loss credit loss estimates. For trade and other receivables, loans and other financial instruments, the Company will be required to use a forward-looking expected loss model rather than the incurred loss model for recognizing credit losses which reflects losses that are probable. Credit losses relating to available for sale debt securities will also be recorded through an allowance for credit losses rather than as a reduction in the amortized cost basis of the securities. The new standard will be effective for Lexaria beginning September 1, 2020, with early adoption permitted. Application of the amendments is through a cumulative-effect adjustment to deficit as of the effective date. The Company is currently assessing the impact of the standard on its consolidated financial statements.

40


Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

As

Not applicable. The Company qualifies as a “smaller reporting company”, we are“Smaller Reporting Company” and, accordingly, this Item and the related disclosure is not required to provide the information required by this Item.required.

Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

41



Page 45 of 83
Table of Contents

  

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

 

To the Shareholders and Directors of

Lexaria Bioscience Corp.


Opinion on the Consolidated Financial Statements

 

We have audited the accompanying consolidated financial statementsbalance sheets of Lexaria Bioscience Corp. (the “Company”), which comprise the consolidated balance sheets as of August 31, 20172019 and 2016,2018, and the related consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive loss, changes in cash flows, and stockholders’ equity for the years ended August 31, 20172019 and 2016. 2018, and the related notes (collectively referred to as the “financial statements”). In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Lexaria Bioscience Corp. as of August 31, 2019 and 2018, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the years ended August 31, 2019 and 2018 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of August 31, 2019, based on the criteria established in Internal Control – Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO), and our report dated November 13, 2019 expressed an adverse opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting because of material weaknesses.

Going Concern

The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern. As discussed in Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company has suffered recurring losses from operations and has a net capital deficiency that raise substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern. Management's plans in regard to these matters are also described in Note 1. The consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.

Basis for Opinion

These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on thesethe Company’s consolidated financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (“PCAOB”) and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States).PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includesmisstatement, whether due to error or fraud.

Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatements of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence supportingregarding the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements. An auditOur audits also includes assessingincluded evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the consolidated financial statement presentation.statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

We have served as the Company’s auditor since 2016.

“DAVIDSON & COMPANY LLP”

Vancouver, Canada

Chartered Professional Accountants

November 13, 2019

Page 46 of 83
Table of Contents

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Shareholders and Directors of

Lexaria Bioscience Corp.

Opinion on Internal Control over Financial Reporting

We have audited Lexaria Bioscience Corp.’s (the “Company”) internal control over financial reporting as of August 31, 2019, based on criteria established in Internal Control — Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (2013 framework) (the COSO criteria). In our opinion, because of the effect of the material weaknesses identified below on the achievement of the objectives of the control criteria, the Company has not maintained effective internal control over financial reporting as of August 31, 2019, based on the COSO criteria.

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB), the Company’s consolidated balance sheet as of August 31, 2019, and the related consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive loss, cash flows, and stockholders’ equity for the year ended August 31, 2019, and the related notes and our report dated November 13, 2019 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.

Basis for Opinion

The Company’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting included in the accompanying Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects.

Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

Definition and Limitations of Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Page 47 of 83
Table of Contents

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

Material Weaknesses

A material weakness is a deficiency, or a combination of deficiencies, in internal control over financial reporting, such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of the Company’s annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis. The following material weaknesses have been identified and included in management’s assessment.

Management did not design and maintain effective controls over the following, each of which is a material weakness:

(a)     lack of adequate oversight related to the development and performance of internal controls;

(b)    lack of defined policies and procedures to collect, process and act on whistleblower complaints; and

(c)     lack of understanding and application of ASC 310 with respect to incurred losses.

These material weaknesses were considered in determining the nature, timing and extent of audit tests applied in our audit of the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Lexaria Bioscience Corp. as of August 31, 2017 and 2016, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the yearsyear ended August 31, 20172019, of the Company, and 2016 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.this report does not affect our report on such financial statements.

“DAVIDSON & COMPANY LLP”

Vancouver, Canada

  Chartered Professional Accountants

November 13, 2019

Page 48 of 83
 
Vancouver, Canada                           Chartered Professional Accountants
November 22, 2017Table of Contents


LEXARIA BIOSCIENCE CORP.

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
SHEET

(Expressed in U.S. Dollars)

  August 31  August 31 
  2017  2016 
       
ASSETS      
       
Current      
       
     Cash$ 2,533,337 $ 93,409 
       
     Accounts and other receivable (Note 6) 45,293  131,083 
       
     Inventory (Note 7) 67,174  134,724 
       
     Prepaid expenses and deposit 149,691  150,950 
  2,795,495  510,166 
     Patent (Note 8) 62,827  53,997 
       
     Equipment 1,856  2,475 
  64,683  56,472 
TOTAL ASSETS$ 2,860,178 $ 566,638 
       
LIABILITIES      
       
Current      
       
     Accounts payable and accrued liabilities$ 32,574 $ 90,010 
     Unearned revenue (Note 9) 17,083  12,500 
     Due to related parties (Note 14) 42,690  331,371 
       
Total Current Liabilities 92,347  433,881 
       
Convertible debenture (Note 10) -  45,000 
       
TOTAL LIABILITIES 92,347  478,881 
       
STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY      
       
Share Capital (Note 11)      
       

     Authorized: 
     220,000,000 common voting shares with a par value of $0.001 per share 
     Issued and outstanding: 67,975,761 common shares at August 31, 2017 
     and 51,288,477 common shares at August 31, 2016

 67,976  51,288 
       
Additional paid-in capital (Note 11) 16,108,270  11,515,419 
       
Deficit (13,169,939) (11,300,662)
       
Equity attributable to shareholders of the Company 3,006,307  266,045 
       
Non-Controlling Interest (Note 8) (238,476) (178,288)
       
Total Stockholders' Equity 2,767,831  87,757 
       
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY$ 2,860,178 $ 566,638 

 

 

August 31

 

 

August 31

 

 

 

2019

 

 

2018

 

 

 

(Audited)

 

 

(Audited)

 

ASSETS

 

 

 

 

 

 

Current

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash and cash equivalents

 

$1,285,147

 

 

$1,727,184

 

Marketable Securities (Note 21)

 

 

64,214

 

 

 

10,151

 

Accounts receivable (Note 7)

 

 

273,145

 

 

 

265,751

 

Inventory (Note 8)

 

 

127,396

 

 

 

87,233

 

Prepaid expenses and deposit (Note 19)

 

 

68,927

 

 

 

193,732

 

Total Current Assets

 

 

1,818,829

 

 

 

2,284,051

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Capital assets, net

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Patent (Note 9)

 

 

265,127

 

 

 

146,538

 

Property & Equipment (Note 10)

 

 

591,263

 

 

 

1,237

 

 

 

 

856,390

 

 

 

147,775

 

TOTAL ASSETS

 

$2,675,219

 

 

$2,431,826

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

LIABILITIES

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Current

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Accounts payable and accrued liabilities (Note 11)

 

$136,411

 

 

$35,785

 

Due to a related party (Note 16)

 

 

48,096

 

 

 

7,855

 

Total Current Liabilities

 

 

184,507

 

 

 

43,640

 

TOTAL LIABILITIES

 

 

184,507

 

 

 

43,640

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Share Capital (Note 13)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Authorized:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

220,000,000 common voting shares with a par value of $0.001 per share Issued and outstanding: 78,787,134 common shares at August 31, 2019 and 75,533,471 common shares at August 31, 2018

 

 

78,787

 

 

 

75,533

 

Additional paid-in capital (Note 13, 14)

 

 

26,172,453

 

 

 

22,095,682

 

Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income

 

 

-

 

 

 

(14,247)

Deficit

 

 

(23,868,202)

 

 

(19,768,782)

Equity attributable to shareholders of the Company

 

 

2,383,038

 

 

 

2,388,186

 

Non-Controlling Interest

 

 

107,674

 

 

 

-

 

Total Stockholders' Equity

 

 

2,490,712

 

 

 

2,388,186

 

TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY

 

$2,675,219

 

 

$2,431,826

 

The accompanying notes are an integral party of these consolidated financial statements.

43


 

Page 49 of 83
Table of Contents

LEXARIA BIOSCIENCE CORP.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND COMPREHENSIVE LOSS

(Expressed in U.S. Dollars, except number of shares)

  YEAR ENDED 
  August 31  August 31 
  2017  2016 
Revenue      
         Sales (Note 13)$ 63,639 $ 40,718 
Cost of Goods Sold      
         Cost of goods sold 29,750  45,615 
Gross Profit / (Loss) 33,889  (4,897)
       
Expenses      
         Accounting and audit 74,087  95,921 
         Depreciation and Amortization (Note 8) 1,488  619 
         Insurance 19,652  17,237 
         Advertising and promotions 209,034  185,459 
         Bank charges and exchange loss (6,415) 15,382 
         Consulting (Note 12, 16) 1,130,916  657,813 
         Interest expense (Note 10) 6,015  2,250 
         Investor relations (Note 12) 91,681  61,574 
         Legal and professional 136,210  37,939 
         Office and miscellaneous 118,863  97,077 
         Research and development 54,185  9,024 
         Taxes (2,374) 3,983 
         Travel 61,401  44,034 
         Inventory write-off (Note 7) 68,611  44,040 
  1,963,354  1,272,352 
Net loss and comprehensive loss for the year$ (1,929,465)$ (1,277,249)
Net loss and comprehensive loss attributable to:      
         Common shareholders$ (1,869,277)$ (1,214,773)
         Non-controlling interest (Note 8)$ (60,188)$ (62,476)
       
Basic and diluted loss per share$ (0.03)$ (0.03)
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding- Basic and diluted 58,765,806  43,840,378 

The accompanying notes are an integral party of these consolidated financial statements.

44


LEXARIA BIOSCIENCE CORP.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Expressed in U.S. Dollars)

 

 

 

YEAR ENDED

 

 

 

 

August 31

 

 

August 31

 

 

 

 

2019

 

 

2018

 

Revenue (Note 15)

 

 

$222,610

 

 

$433,287

 

Cost of Goods Sold

 

 

 

22,893

 

 

 

25,185

 

Gross profit

 

 

 

199,717

 

 

 

408,102

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Expenses

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Accounting and audit

 

 

 

77,388

 

 

 

85,553

 

Depreciation and amortization (Note 9, 10)

 

 

 

60,550

 

 

 

2,307

 

Advertising and promotions

 

 

 

515,360

 

 

 

489,058

 

Bad Debt

 

 

 

75,000

 

 

 

-

 

Consulting (Notes 13, 14, 16)

 

 

 

1,444,735

 

 

 

5,332,398

 

Investor relations

 

 

 

203,893

 

 

 

188

 

Legal and professional

 

 

 

670,863

 

 

 

289,062

 

Office and miscellaneous

 

 

 

297,209

 

 

 

217,655

 

Research and development

 

 

 

555,730

 

 

 

492,864

 

Travel

 

 

 

100,587

 

 

 

99,236

 

Wages & Salaries

 

 

 

333,199

 

 

 

-

 

Gain on disposal of assets

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

(3,998)

Unrealized Loss on marketable securities (Note 21)

 

 

 

16,434

 

 

 

-

 

Inventory writeoff (Note 8)

 

 

 

7,182

 

 

 

12,966

 

 

 

 

 

4,358,130

 

 

 

7,017,289

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net (loss) and comprehensive loss for the period

 

 

$(4,158,413)

 

$(6,609,187)

Net (loss) and comprehensive loss attributable to:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Common Shareholders

 

 

$(4,099,420)

 

$(6,598,843)

Non-Controlling Interest

 

 

$(58,993)

 

$(10,344)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Basic and diluted (loss) per share

 

 

$(0.05)

 

$(0.09)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Weighted average number of common shares outstanding

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

-Basic and diluted

 

 

 

77,792,263

 

 

 

70,960,416

 

  YEAR ENDED 
  August 31  August 31 
  2017  2016 
Cash flows used in operating activities      
     Net loss and comprehensive loss for the year$ (1,929,465)$ (1,277,249)
     Adjustments to reconcile net loss and comprehensive loss to net cash used in operating activities:    
           Stock based compensation 113,044  122,015 
           Depreciation and amortization 1,488  619 
           Inventory write-off 68,611  44,040 
           Common shares issued for interest (Note 10) 1,125  - 
           Common shares issued for services 207,660  79,500 
           Warrants issued for services 292,750  32,252 
     Change in working capital:      
           Accounts and other receivable (7,710) (6,201)
           Inventory (1,061) (10,778)
           Prepaid expenses and deposit (17,817) 26,190 
           Accounts payable and accrued liabilities (40,436) 56,937 
           Due to related parties (238,681) 259,319 
           Unearned revenue 4,583  12,500 
Net cash used in operating activities (1,545,909) (660,856)
       
Cash flows used in investing activities      
     Patent (9,699) (17,008)
     Acquisition of equipment -  (3,094)
Net cash used in investing activities (9,699) (20,102)
       
Cash flows from financing activities      
     Proceeds from (Payments of) loans/convertible debentures (50,000) 95,000 
     Proceeds from issuance of equity 4,045,536  419,292 
Net cash from financing activities 3,995,536  514,292 
       
Change in cash 2,439,928  (166,666)
Cash, beginning of year 93,409  260,075 
Cash, end of year$ 2,533,337 $ 93,409 
Supplemental information of cash flows:      
     Interest paid in cash$ 4,890 $ 2,250 
     Income taxes paid in cash$ - $ - 
     Shares issued to convert convertible debt$ 45,000 $ - 
     Subscription funds receivable$ - $ 93,500 
     Stock based compensation recognized from prepaid expense$ 19,076 $ 38,150 
     Shares issued for services in accounts payable and accrued liabilities$ 17,000 $ - 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these audited consolidated financial statements.

45


 

Page 50 of 83
Table of Contents

LEXARIABIOSCIENCECORP.

CONSOLIDATEDSTATEMENTS STATEMENT OFSTOCKHOLDERS'EQUITY
CASH FLOWS

(Expressed in U.S.Dollars)

  COMMON STOCK             
        ADDITIONAL          
        PAID-IN        TOTAL 
  SHARES  AMOUNT  CAPITAL  DEFICIT  NCI  EQUITY 
     $  $  $  $  $ 
Balance, August 31, 2015 43,838,286  43,838  10,814,460  (10,085,889) (115,812) 656,597 
Shares issued for services 625,000  625  78,875  -  -  79,500 
Non-controlling Interest -  -  -  -  (62,476) (62,476)
Stock based compensation (Note 12) -  -  83,865  -  -  83,865 
Private placement of shares, net of issuance cost 5,266,858  5,267  414,025  -  -  419,292 
Private placement subscription receivable 1,558,333  1,558  91,942  -  -  93,500 
Warrants to be issued for services -  -  32,252  -  -  32,252 
Net loss -  -  -  (1,214,773) -  (1,214,773)
Balance, August 31, 2016 51,288,477  51,288  11,515,419  (11,300,662) (178,288) 87,757 
Shares issued for services 939,354  938  223,722  -  -  224,660 
Non-controlling Interest -  -  -  -  (60,188) (60,188)
Stock based compensation (Note 12) -  -  93,968  -  -  93,968 
Private placement of shares, net of issuance cost 4,104,280  4,105  1,537,637  -  -  1,541,742 
Warrants issued for services -  -  292,750  -  -  292,750 
Exercise of stock options 1,014,125  1,015  176,247  -  -  177,262 
Exercise of warrants 10,322,025  10,322  2,222,710  -  -  2,233,032 
Conversion of debt 307,500  308  45,817  -  -  46,125 
Net loss -  -  -  (1,869,277) -  (1,869,277)
Balance, August 31, 2017 67,975,761  67,976  16,108,270  (13,169,939) (238,476) 2,767,831 

 

 

YEAR ENDED

 

 

 

August 31

 

 

August 31

 

 

 

2019

 

 

2018

 

Cash flows used in operating activities

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net loss and comprehensive loss

 

$(4,158,413)

 

$(6,609,187)

Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Stock based compensation

 

 

626,692

 

 

 

2,602,239

 

Depreciation and amortization

 

 

60,550

 

 

 

2,307

 

Inventory write-off (Note 8)

 

 

7,182

 

 

 

12,966

 

Bad Debt Expense

 

 

75,000

 

 

 

-

 

Unrealized loss on marketable securities

 

 

16,434

 

 

 

-

 

Unrealized foreign exchange

 

 

-

 

 

 

602

 

Common shares issued for services

 

 

234,500

 

 

 

781,056

 

Warrants issued for services

 

 

52,817

 

 

 

1,063,270

 

Change in working capital

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Accounts receivable

 

 

(138,644)

 

 

(245,458)

Inventory

 

 

(47,345)

 

 

(33,025)

Prepaid expenses and deposits

 

 

124,805

 

 

 

(44,041)

Accounts payable and accrued liabilities

 

 

100,626

 

 

 

3,210

 

Due to related parties

 

 

40,241

 

 

 

(34,835)

Deferred revenue

 

 

-

 

 

 

(17,083)

Net cash used in operating activities

 

$(3,005,555)

 

$(2,517,979)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash flows used in investing activities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Investment in Poviva

 

 

-

 

 

 

(70,000)

Patent

 

 

(122,982)

 

 

(85,399)

Property & Equipment

 

 

(646,183)

 

 

-

 

Net cash used in investing activities

 

$(769,165)

 

$(155,399)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash flows from financing activities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Investment from NCI

 

 

1,000,000

 

 

 

-

 

Proceeds from issuance of equity

 

 

2,332,683

 

 

 

1,867,224

 

Net cash from financing activities

 

$3,332,683

 

 

$1,867,224

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Decrease in cash and cash equivalents

 

 

(442,037)

 

 

(806,153)

Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of year

 

 

1,727,184

 

 

 

2,533,337

 

Cash and cash equivalents, end of year

 

$1,285,147

 

 

$1,727,184

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Supplemental information of cash flows:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Income taxes paid in cash

 

$13,919

 

 

$-

 

Common shares issued to settle AP

 

$-

 

 

$12,000

 

Reclassification of NCI to additional paid in capital on acquisition

 

$833,333

 

 

$318,820

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these audited consolidated financial statements.

46



 

LEXARIA BIOSCIENCE CORP.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
August 31, 2017
(Expressed in U.S. Dollars)Page 51 of 83
 
Table of Contents

LEXARIA BIOSCIENCE CORP.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY

(Expressed in U.S. Dollars)

 

 

COMMON STOCK

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

SHARES

 

 

AMOUNT

$

 

 

 ADDITIONAL

PAID-IN CAPITAL

$

 

 

DEFICIT

$

 

 

NCI

$

 

 

AOCI

$

 

 

TOTAL STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY

$

 

Balance August 31, 2017

 

 

67,975,761

 

 

 

67,976

 

 

 

16,108,270

 

 

 

(13,169,939)

 

 

(238,476)

 

 

-

 

 

 

2,767,831

 

Non-controlling interest

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

(318,820)

 

 

-

 

 

 

248,820

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

(70,000)

Shares issued for services

 

 

647,690

 

 

 

648

 

 

 

780,408

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

781,056

 

Stock based compensation

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

2,602,239

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

2,602,239

 

Warrants issued for services

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

1,063,270

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

1,063,270

 

Exercise of stock options

 

 

545,875

 

 

 

546

 

 

 

93,156

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

93,702

 

Exercise of warrants

 

 

6,364,145

 

 

 

6,363

 

 

 

1,767,159

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

1,773,522

 

Net loss

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

(6,598,843)

 

 

(10,344)

 

 

-

 

 

 

(6,609,187)

Other comprehensive loss

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

(14,247)

 

 

(14,247)

Balance August 31, 2018

 

 

75,533,471

 

 

 

75,533

 

 

 

22,095,682

 

 

 

(19,768,782)

 

 

-

 

 

 

(14,247)

 

 

2,388,186

 

Shares issued for services

 

 

250,000

 

 

 

250

 

 

 

234,250

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

234,500

 

Stock based compensation

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

626,692

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

626,692

 

Warrants issued for services

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

52,817

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

52,817

 

Exercise of stock options

 

 

430,000

 

 

 

430

 

 

 

65,820

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

66,250

 

Exercise of warrants

 

 

1,626,513

 

 

 

1,627

 

 

 

794,496

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

796,123

 

Private Placement

 

 

947,150

 

 

 

947

 

 

 

1,469,363

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

1,470,310

 

Net loss

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

(4,099,420)

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

(4,099,420)

Non-controlling interest

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

(58,993)

 

 

-

 

 

 

(58,993)

Other comprehensive income

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

14,247

 

 

 

14,247

 

Subsidiary Investment

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

833,333

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

166,667

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

1,000,000

 

Balance August 31, 2019

 

 

78,787,134

 

 

 

78,787

 

 

 

26,172,453

 

 

 

(23,868,202)

 

 

107,674

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

2,490,712

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these audited consolidated financial statements.

Page 52 of 83
Table of Contents

LEXARIA BIOSCIENCE CORP.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

August 31, 2019

(Expressed in U.S. Dollars)

1.

Organization, Business and Going Concern

Lexaria BiosciencesBioscience Corp. (“Lexaria”, or the “Company”) Company was formed on December 9, 2004 under the laws of the State of Nevada as an independent oil and gas company engaged in the exploration, development and acquisition of oil and gas properties in the United States and Canada.Nevada. In March of 2014, the Company began its entry into the bioscience and alternative health and wellness business and discontinued its involvement in the oil and gas business in November 2014. In May 2016, the Company also commenced out-licensing its patented DehydraTECH™ technology (the “Technology”) for improved delivery of bioactive compounds that promotes healthy ingestion methods, lower overall dosing and higher effectiveness in active molecule delivery. The Company has its office in Kelowna, BC, Canada.

The Company’s consolidated financial statements included herein have been prepared pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (U.S.(US GAAP) applicable to a going concern, which contemplates the realization of assets and the satisfaction of liabilities and commitments in the normal course of business. The Company hasrecurring losses from operations and net capital deficiency raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a net loss attributable to its common shareholders of $1,869,277 for the year ended August 31, 2017 (2016: $1,214,773) and at August 31, 2017 had a deficit accumulated since its inception of $13,169,939 (2016: $11,300,662). The Company has a working capital balance of $2,703,148 as at August 31, 2017 (2016: $76,285).

going concern.

The Company requires additional funds to maintain its operations and developments. Management’s plans in this regard are to raise equity and debt financing as required, but there is no certainty that such financing will be available or that it will be available at acceptable terms. The outcome of these matters cannot be predicted at this time.

2.

Business Risk and Liquidity

The Company is subject to several categories of risk associated with its operating activities. The production and sale of alternative health products is an emerging industry in which business practices are not yet standardized and are subject to frequent scrutiny and evaluation by federal, state, provincial, and municipal authorities, academics, and media outlets, among others. Although we intend to develop our businesses in accordance with best ethical practices, we may suffer negative publicity if we, our partners, contractors, or customers are found to have engaged in any environmentally insensitive practices or other business practices that are viewed as unethical.

Our operations may require licenses and permits from various governmental authorities. We believe that we will be able to obtain all necessary licenses and permits under applicable laws and regulations for our operations and believe we will be able to comply in all material respects with the terms of such licenses and permits. However, such licenses and permits are subject to change in various circumstances. There can be no guarantee that we will be able to obtain or maintain all necessary licenses and permits, and failing to obtain or retain required licenses could have a materially adverse effect on the Company.

Lexaria and its subsidiaries are not involved directly or indirectly in the cultivation, processing, distribution, or utilization of Cannabis or Cannabis derived components. All of Lexaria’s consumer products utilize legally sourced Hemp and Hemp components in their production. Lexaria does have an ancillary involvement risk via out-licensing of its patented technologyTechnology to licensees that choose to utilize its technologyTechnology to manufacture products that contain locally or state approved but federally regulated and controlled contents. There can be no guarantee that changes in the regulatory framework and environment will not occur and such changes could have a materially adverse effect on the Company. It is possible some jurisdictions

Lexaria and its subsidiaries are not involved directly or indirectly in the production or sale of any products containing nicotine. Products containing nicotine have historically been involved in litigation in the USA. Lexaria’s corporate licensee may even interpretintroduce products containing nicotine that utilize Lexaria’s ancillary involvement as in contravention with regulations.

technology to the US consumer market, which could therefore introduce third-party risks to Lexaria.

47



Page 53 of 83
Table of Contents

3.

Significant Accounting Policies

a)

Accounting Principles

These consolidated financial statements have been prepared in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles of the United States of America. All amounts, unless otherwise stated, are in United States dollars.

b)

Basis of Presentation

Revenue Recognition

On December 16, 2015, the Company completed a forward stock split of our authorized and issued and outstanding shares of common stock on a basis of 1 old share of common stock for 1.1 new shares of common stock. The forward stock split affected all the issued and outstanding common shares, stock options, and warrants at the effective date and increased authorized capital to 220,000,000, par value of $0.001. All common shares numbers, numbers of stock options, and warrants and related per share amounts disclosed in these consolidated financial statements have been retroactively adjusted to reflect the forward stock split.

Product Revenue

c)

Basis of Consolidation

These consolidated financial statements include the financial statements of the Company, its wholly-owned subsidiary, Lexaria CanPharm Corp. which was incorporated on April 4, 2014, under the laws of Canada, 51%-owned subsidiary PoViva Tea, LLC which was incorporated on December 12, 2014, under the laws of the State of Nevada, and the 50%-owned subsidiary Ambarii Trade Corporation, which has no assets or liabilities, that was incorporated on April 24, 2017 under the laws of the Province of British Columbia. All significant inter-company balances and transactions have been eliminated.

d)

Revenue Recognition

Revenue from the sale of health products is generally recognized when persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, delivery has occurred, the sales price is fixed or determinable, and collectability is reasonably assured. In most cases, these conditions are met when the product is shipped to the customer.assured, which typically occurs upon shipment. The Company reports its sales net of the amount of actual sales returns and the amount of reserves established for anticipated sales returns based upon historical return rates.returns. Sales tax collected from customers is excluded from net sales.

Licensing Revenue from Intellectual Property

Lexaria also enters into agreements to license out its

We recognize revenue for License fees at a point in time following the transfer of our intellectual property, our patented lipid nutrient infusion technology that can include various combinations of services. Where elements are delivered over different periods of time, and when allowed under U.S. GAAP, revenue is allocatedDehydraTECH™ for infusing Active Pharmaceutical Ingredients, to the respective elements basedlicensee, which typically occurs on their relative selling prices at the inceptiondelivery of the arrangement, and revenue is recognized as each element is delivered. The Company uses a hierarchy to determine the fair value to be used for allocating revenue to elements: (i) vendor-specific objective evidence of fair value (“VSOE”), (ii) third-party evidence and (iii) best estimate of selling price (“ESP”). Generally VSOE is the price charged when the deliverable is sold separately or the price established by management for a product that is not yet sold if it is probable that the price will not change before introduction into the marketplace. ESPs are established as best estimates of what the selling prices would be if the deliverables were sold regularly on a stand-alone basis. Given Lexaria’s early stage of such line of revenue, the Company’s process for determining the VSOE and ESP requires judgment and considers multiple factors that may vary overtime depending upon the unique facts and circumstances related to each deliverable.documentation.

48



e)Usage Fees from Intellectual Property

We recognize revenue for Usage fees when usage of our DehydraTECH intellectual property occurs by licensees infusing an Active Pharmaceutical Ingredient into one or more of their product lines for sale.

c) Inventory and Cost of Sales

The Company’s inventory consists of finished goods, work in progress, and raw materials. In all classes, inventory is valued at the lower of cost or market. Cost is determined on a first-in, first-out basis.

Cost of sales includes all expenditures incurred in bringing the goods to the point of sale. Inventory costs and costs of sales include direct costs of the raw material, inbound freight charges, warehousing costs, handling costs (receiving and purchasing) and utilities and overhead expenses related to the Company’s manufacturing and processing facilities.

f)

d) Cash and Cash Equivalents

Cash equivalents comprise certain highly liquid instruments with a maturity of three months or less when purchased. As of August 31, 2017,2019, and August 31, 2016, The2018, the Company held cash only.

e) Equipment
g)

Equipment

Equipment is stated at cost less accumulated depreciation and impairment, and depreciated using the straight-line method over itstheir useful lifelives or by units of five years.production.

f) Patents
h)

Patents

Capitalized patent costs represent legal costs incurred to establish patents. When patents reach a mature stage, any associated legal costs are comprised mostly of maintenance fees and are expensed as incurred. Capitalized patent costs are amortized on a straight-line basis over the remaining life of the patent. The Company was granted its first patent on October 25, 2016, (Note 8), with a legal life of 20 years. Additional patent information is in Note 9.

Page 54 of 83
 
Table of Contents

g) Stock-Based Compensation
i)

Stock-Based Compensation

The Company accounts for its stock-based compensation awards in accordance with ASC Topic 718, Compensation—Stock Compensation (“ASC 718”). ASC 718 requires all stock-based payments to employees, including grants of employee stock options, to be recognized as expenseexpenses in the statements of operations based on their grant date fair values. For stock options granted to employees and to members of the Board of Directors for their services on the Board of Directors, the Company estimates the grant date fair value of each option award using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model. The use of the Black-Scholes option-pricing model requires management to make assumptions with respect to the expected term of the option, the expected volatility of the common stock consistent with the expected life of the option, risk-free interest rates and expected dividend yields of the common stock.

Stock-based payments issued to non-employees are recorded at their fair values and are periodically revalued as the equity instruments vest and are recognized as expense over the related service period in accordance with the provisions of ASC 718 and ASC Topic 505, Equity. For equity instruments granted to non-employees, the Company recognizes stock-based compensation expense on vesting.

j)

h) Loss Per Share

The Company applies the guidance in ASC 260 Earnings Per Share. Loss per share is computed using the weighted average number of shares outstanding during the period. Diluted loss per share is equivalent to basic loss per share because the potential exercise of the equity-based financial instruments was anti-dilutive.

49



k)

i) Foreign Currency Translation

The Company’sCompany s operations are located in the United States of America and Canada, and it has offices in Canada. The Company maintains its accounting records in U.S. Dollars, as follows:

At the transaction date, each asset, liability, revenue and expense that was acquired or incurred in a foreign currency is translated into U.S. dollars by the using of the exchange rate in effect at that date. At the period end, monetary assets and liabilities are translated at the exchange rate in effect at that date. The resulting foreign exchange gains and losses are included in profit or loss.

l)

j) Financial Instruments

ASC 820 Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures, requires an entity to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value. ASC 820 establishes a fair value hierarchy based on the level of independent, objective evidence surrounding the inputs used to measure fair value. A financial instrument’sinstrument s categorization within the fair value hierarchy is based upon the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement. ASC 820 prioritizes the inputs into three levels that may be used to measure fair value:

Level 1 - Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities;

Level 2 - Inputs other than quoted prices included within Level 1 that are either directly or indirectly observable; and

Level 3 - Unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity, therefore requiring an entity to develop its own assumptions about the assumptions that market participants would use in pricing.

The Company’sCompany s financial instruments consist primarily of cash, marketable securities, accounts and other receivable, accounts payable and accrued liabilities, and due to related parties, and convertible debenture.parties. The carrying amounts of cash, accounts and other receivable, accounts payable and accrued liabilities, and due to related parties approximate their fair values due to their short maturities. The carrying valuematurities or quoted market prices.

Page 55 of the Company’s convertible debenture approximates its fair value based on comparison of the interest rate and terms of such debt to the rates and terms of debt currently available to the Company.

83
 
Table of Contents

The Company is located in Canada, which results in exposure to market risks from changes in foreign currency rates. The foreign currency exchange risk is the financial risk to the Company’s operations that arise from fluctuations in foreign exchange rates and the degree of volatility of these rates. Currently, the Company does not use derivative instruments to reduce its exposure to foreign currency risk as the Company does not hold a significant position in foreign currencies, such as the Canadian dollar, and the impact of a change in a few basis points for USD/CAD is not expected to be material.

k) Income Taxes
m)

Income Taxes

The Company applies the guidance in ASC 740, Income Taxes, which requires the Company to recognize deferred tax liabilities and assets for the expected future tax consequences of events that have been recognized in the Company’s financial statements or tax returns using the liability method. Under this method, deferred tax liabilities and assets are determined based on the temporary differences between the financial statement and tax bases of assets and liabilities using enacted tax rates in effect in the year in which the differences are expected to reverse.

50



n)

l) Impairment of Long-Lived Assets

Long-lived assets, including equipment, and intangible assets, such as the Company’sCompany s patents, are assessed for potential impairment when there is evidence that events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recovered. An impairment loss is recognized when the carrying amount of the long-lived asset is not recoverable and exceeds its fair value. The carrying amount of a long-lived asset is not recoverable if it exceeds the sum of the undiscounted cash flows expected to result from the use and eventual disposition of the asset. Any required impairment loss is measured as the amount by which the carrying amount of the long-lived asset exceeds its fair value and is recorded as a reduction in the carrying value of the related asset and a charge to the profit or loss. Intangible assets with indefinite lives are tested for impairment annually and in interim periods if certain events occur indicating that the carrying value of the intangible assets may be impaired.

o)

m) Comprehensive Income

The Company applies ASC 220, Comprehensive Income, which establishes standards for reporting and presentation of comprehensive income, its components and accumulated balances. The Company discloses this information on its Statement of Stockholders’Stockholders Equity. Comprehensive income comprises equity changes except those transactions resulting from investments by owners and distributions to owners.

p)

n) Credit Risk and Receivable Concentration

The Company places its cash with a high credit quality financial institution. As of August 31, 2017,2019, the Company had approximately $2,533,000$1,285,147 in the bank (August 31, 2016: $93,000)2018: $1,727,184).

As at August 31, 2017,2019 we had $106,000 (2018 $199,375) in Intellectual Property Territory License fees receivable (Note 7) consisting of amounts due from three licensees (2018 three). These receivable amounts are based on contractual terms for payments that are payable within twelve months of signing the definitive agreements or routine IP Usage Fees. To date these licensees have performed all of their required obligations. The Company incurred $75,000 in bad debt in fiscal 2019.

As at August 31, 2019, the Company had $43,515 (2016$161,418 (2018 - $27,583)$61,176) in sales tax receivable (Note 6). The Company considers its credit risk to be low for such receivable.receivables.

q)

Convertible Debenture

The Company accounts for its convertible debt instruments that may be settled in cash upon conversion according to ASC 470-20-30-22 which requires the proceeds from the issuance of such convertible debt instruments to be allocated between debt and equity components so that debt is discounted to reflect the Company’s non-convertible debt borrowing rate.

Further, the Company applies ASC 470-20-35-13 which requires the debt discount to be amortized over the period the convertible debt is expected to be outstanding as additional non-cash interest expense.

r)

o) Commitments and Contingencies

In accordance with ASC 450-20, Accounting for Contingencies, the Company records accruals for such loss contingencies when it is probable that a liability has been incurred and the amount of loss can be reasonably estimated. In the event that estimates or assumptions prove to differ from actual results, adjustments are made in subsequent periods to reflect more current information. Historically, the Company has not experienced any material claims.

 
s)

Research and Development

Page 56 of 83
 
Table of Contents

p) Research and Development

Research and development costs are expensed as incurred.

51



t)

Advertising

The Company expenses advertising costs as they are incurred. The advertising expenses were $209,034 and $185,459 for the years ended August 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively.


4.

Estimates and Judgments

Basis of Consolidation

These consolidated financial statements include the financial statements of the Company and its wholly owned subsidiaries; Lexaria CanPharm ULC, PoViva Corp., Lexaria Hemp Corp., Kelowna Management Services Corp. and Lexaria Pharmaceutical Corp, and our subsidiary Lexaria Nicotine LLC. On January 15, 2019, the Company announced the initial investment of $1,000,000 from Altria Ventures Inc., an indirect wholly owned subsidiary of Altria Group, Inc., for a 16.667% equity interest along with certain other rights in Lexaria Nicotine LLC. All significant intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated.

5.Estimates and Judgments

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S GAAP requires us to make certain estimates, judgments and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, the disclosure of contingent liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting period. Some of the Company’s accounting policies require us to make subjective judgments, often as a result of the need to make estimates of matters that are inherently uncertain. These accounting policies involve critical accounting estimates because they are particularly dependent on estimates and assumptions made by management about matters that are highly uncertain at the time the accounting estimates are made. Although we have used our best estimates based on facts and circumstances available to us at the time, different estimates reasonably could have been used. Changes in the accounting estimates used by the Company are reasonably likely to occur from time to time, which may have a material effect on the presentation of financial condition and results of operations.

The Company reviews these estimates, judgments and assumptions periodically and reflect the effects of revisions in the period in which they are deemed to be necessary. We believe that these estimates are reasonable; however, actual results could differ from these estimates

estimates.

Significant accounting estimates and assumptions are used for, but not limited to:

a)

a) The Valuation of Deferred Tax Assets

Judgement is required in determining whether deferred tax assets are recognized on the balance sheet. The recognition of deferred tax assets requires management to assess the likelihood that the Company will generate taxable income in future periods to utilize the deferred tax assets. Due to the Company’sCompany s history of losses, deferred tax assets have not bebeen recognized by Lexaria.

b)

Convertible Debenture

The Company entered into a convertible debenture agreement on March 8, 2016 (Note 10) and evaluated the terms of the various conversion options to assess if separate accounting is required for such embedded features, which are adjusted to fair value through earnings at each reporting period. The Company determined that the embedded features within the debenture do not meet the net settlement provision characteristic of a derivative and as a result, did not apply the bifurcation requirements for such conversion options.

c)

Revenue Recognition of Licenses

Pursuant to the license agreement for the Company’s lipid infusion technology (the “Technology”) (Note 9), the licensee acquired territorial licenses for an upfront fee. The Company is also required to provide support services in connection with the licensee’s use of the Technology over the term of the license. As the support services will not be sold on a stand-alone basis, the Company is unable to establish VSOE of their fair value to be able to allocate the proceeds objectively to such services and the license. Accordingly, the up-front fee is being recognized ratably over the term of the license, which is initially for two years.

52



d)

Value of Stock Options and Warrants

The Company provides compensation benefits to its employees, directors, officers, and consultants, through a stock option plan. The fair value of each option award is estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. Expected volatility assumptions used in the model is based on the historical volatility of the Company’sCompany s share price. The Company uses historical data to estimate the period of option exercises for use in the valuation model. The risk-free interest rate for the expected term of the option is based on the yields of government bonds. Changes in these assumptions, especially the share price volatility and the expected life determination could have a material impact on the Company’sCompany s profit and loss for the periods presented. All estimates used in the model are based on historical data which may not be representative of future results.


5.

New Accounting Pronouncements

Page 57 of 83
 
Table of Contents

6.Recent Accounting Guidance

In May 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (the “FASB”) issued a new standard related to the revenue recognition. Under the new standard, recognition of revenue occurs when a customer obtains control of promised goods or services in an amount that reflects the consideration which the entity expects to receive in exchange for those goods or services. In addition, the standard requires disclosure of the nature, amount, timing, and uncertainty of revenue and cash flows arising from contracts with customers. The FASB has recently issued several amendments to the standards, including clarification on the accounting for licenses of intellectual property and identifying performance obligations.

The guidance permits two methods of adoption: retrospectively to each prior reporting period presented (full retrospective method), or retrospectively with the cumulative effect of initially applying the guidance recognized at the date of initial application (the cumulative catch-up transition method). The Company will apply the full retrospective approach to adopt the standard but does not anticipate that this standard will have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.

In July 2015, FASB issued ASU 2015-11, Simplifying the Measurement of Inventory (“ASU 2015-11”). ASU 2015-11 requires that an entity measure inventory at the lower of cost and net realizable value. This ASU does not apply to inventory measured using last-in, first-out methodology. ASU 2015-11 is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016, including interim periods within that reporting period. The Company does not expect the new standard to have a significant impact on its consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

In November 2015, the FASB issued guidance that requires companies to classify all deferred tax assets or liabilities as noncurrent on the balance sheet rather than separately disclosing deferred taxes as current and noncurrent. This standard is effective for the Company beginning on September 1, 2017 and can be applied either prospectively or retrospectively to all periods presented upon adoption. The standard is not expected to have any impact on the Company’s financial statements.

In January 2016, FASB issued a new standardan ASU, Subtopic 82510, to amend certain aspects of recognition, measurement, presentation, and disclosure of financial instruments. Most prominent among the amendments is the requirement for changes in fair value of equity investments, with certain exceptions, to be recognized through profit or loss rather than other comprehensive income. The newCompany adopted the standard will be effective for the Company beginning September 1, 2018. The standard isimpact was not expected to have anymaterial and the $14,247 impact on the Company’s financial statements.

statements was included in income in the current period.

In February 2016 FASB issued ASU No. 2016-02,201602, Leases(Topic (Topic 842)which supersedes FASB ASC Topic 840, Leases (Topic 840) and provides principles for the recognition, measurement, presentation, and disclosure of leases for both lessees and the lessors. The new standard requires the lessees to apply a dual approach, classifying leases as either finance or operating leases based on the principle of whether or not the lease is effectively a financed purchase by the lessee. The classification will determine whether lease expense is recognized based on an effective interest method or on a straight-line basis over the term of the lease, respectively. A lessee is also required to record a right-of-useright of use asset and a lease liability for all leases with a term of greater than twelve months

53



regardless of classification. Leases with a term of twelve months or less will be accounted for similar to existing guidance for operating leases. The standard is effective for annual and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2018, with early adoption permitted upon issuance. When adopted, the Company does not expect this guidance to have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.

In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-09, Compensation-Stock Compensation (Topic 718), Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting. Under ASU 2016-09, companies will no longer record excess tax benefits and certain tax deficiencies in additional paid in capital (“APIC”). Instead, they will record all excess tax benefits and tax deficiencies as income tax expense or benefit in the income statement and the APIC pools will be eliminated. In addition, ASU 2016-09 eliminates the requirement that excess tax benefits be realized before companies can recognize them. ASU 2016-09 also requires companies to present excess tax benefits as an operating activity on the statement of cash flows rather than as a financing activity. Furthermore, ASU 2016-09 will increase the amount an employer can withhold to cover income taxes on awards and still qualify for the exception to liability classification for shares used to satisfy the employer’s statutory income tax withholding obligation. An employer with a statutory income tax withholding obligation will now be allowed to withhold shares with the fair value up to the amount of taxes owed using the maximum statutory rate in the employee’s applicable jurisdiction(s). ASU 2016-09 requires a company to classify the cash paid to a tax authority when shares are withheld to satisfy its statutory income tax withholding obligation as a financing activity on the statement of cash flows. Under current U.S. GAAP, it is not specified how these cash flows should be classified. In addition, companies will now have to elect whether to account for forfeitures on share-based payments by (1) recognizing forfeiture awards as they occur or (2) estimating the number of awards expected to be forfeited and adjusting the estimate when it is likely to change, as is currently required. The amendments of this ASU are effective for reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016, with early adoption permitted but all of the guidance must be adopted in the same period. The Company does not expect this guidance to have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.

In June 2016, the FASB issued a new standard to replace the incurred loss impairment methodology in current U.S. GAAP with a methodology that reflects expected credit losses and requires consideration of a broader range of reasonable and supportable information to inform credit loss credit loss estimates. For trade and other receivables, loans and other financial instruments, the Company will be required to use a forward-looking expected loss model rather than the incurred loss model for recognizing credit losses which reflects losses that are probable. Credit losses relating to available for sale debt securities will also be recorded through an allowance for credit losses rather than as a reduction in the amortized cost basis of the securities. The new standard will be effective for Lexaria beginning September 1, 2020, with early adoption permitted. Application of the amendments is through a cumulative-effectcumulative effect adjustment to deficit as of the effective date. The Company is currently assessing the impact of the standard on its consolidated financial statements.

In February 2018, the FASB issued ASU No. 201802, Income Statement–Reporting Comprehensive Income (Topic 220): Reclassification of Certain Tax Effects from Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income, which allows a reclassification from accumulated other comprehensive income to retained earnings for stranded tax effects resulting from the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act enacted by the U.S. federal government on December 22, 2017 (the “2017 Tax Act”). Consequently, the amendments eliminate the stranded tax effects resulting from the 2017 Tax Act and will improve the usefulness of information reported to financial statement users. The amendments in this ASU are effective for all entities for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, and interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption is permitted, including adoption in any interim period, (1) for public business entities for reporting periods for which financial statements have not yet been issued and (2) for all other entities for reporting periods for which financial statements have not yet been made available for issuance. The Company is currently evaluating the effect this ASU will have on its consolidated financial statements and related disclosures but does not expect it to have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.

In June 2018, the FASB issued ASU No. 201807, Compensation—Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Improvements to Nonemployee Share Based Payment Accounting. This is a simplification that involves several aspects of accounting for nonemployee share-based payments resulting from expanding the scope of Topic 718 to include share-based payment transactions for acquiring goods and services from nonemployees. The new standard will be effective for Lexaria for September 1, 2019. The Company does not expect it to have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.

Page 58 of 83
 
6.Table of Contents

7.

Accounts and Other Receivable

Receivables

   August 31  August 31 
   2017  2016 
   $  $ 
 Trade and deposits receivable 1,778  - 
 Territory License Fee receivable (Note 9) -  10,000 
 Sales tax receivable 43,515  27,583 
 Private placement receivable (Note 11) -  93,500 
   45,293  131,083 

54

 

 

August 31

 

 

August 31

 

 

 

2019

 

 

2018

 

 

 

$

 

 

$

 

Trade and deposits receivable

 

 

5,727

 

 

 

5,200

 

Territory License Fee receivable

 

 

106,000

 

 

 

199,375

 

Sales tax receivable

 

 

161,418

 

 

 

61,176

 

 

 

 

273,145

 

 

 

265,751

 



7.8.

Inventory


   August 31  August 31 
   2017  2016 
   $  $ 
 Raw materials 14,220  27,358 
 Finished goods 42,266  94,349 
 Work in progress 10,688  13,017 
   67,174  134,724 

 

 

August 31

 

 

August 31

 

 

 

2019

 

 

2018

 

 

 

$

 

 

$

 

Raw materials

 

 

45,068

 

 

 

29,355

 

Work in progress

 

 

-

 

 

 

9,752

 

Finished goods

 

 

82,328

 

 

 

48,126

 

 

 

 

127,396

 

 

 

87,233

 

During the year ended August 31, 2017,2019, the Company wrote down $68,611 (2016$7,182 (2018 - $44,040)$12,966) of inventory to reflect its net realisable value.

9.Intellectual Property
8.

Alternative Health Products

On November 12, 2014, the Company signed an agreement with Poppy’s Teas LLC. (“PoViva”)whereby it acquired a 51% of ViPova™.interest. Subsequent to signing the agreement, Poppy’s Teas LLC effected a name change to PoViva Tea LLC. The Company hadacquired the option to acquire an additional 24% interest in PoViva. Lexaria acquired 100%remaining 49% ownership interest in PoViva Tea, LLC subsequent to August 31,in October 2017 via compensation of $70,000, a waiver on certain debts owed to Lexaria, and a 5%, 20-year royalty on net profits of ViPova TeaTMtea, coffee, and hot chocolate sales. No Lexaria stock or options were issued. On September 18, 2018 Poviva Tea, LLC converted from a Nevada limited liability company to a Nevada corporation and effected a name change to Poviva Corp.

The following is a list of US capitalized patents held by the Company

Issued Patent #

Patent Issuance Date

Patent Family

US 9,474,725 B1

10/25/2016

Food and Beverage Compositions Infused With

Lipophilic Active Agents and Methods of Use Thereof

US 9,839,612 B2

12/12/2017

US 9,972,680 B2

05/15/2018

US 9,974,739 B2

05/22/2018

US 10,084,044 B2

09/25/2018

US 10,103,225 B2

10/16/2018

US 10,381,440

08/13/2019

US 10,374,036

08/06/2019

Page 59 of 83
 
Table of Contents

The Company also holds non-capitalized patents outside the US. A continuity schedule for patents is presented below:

 

 

August 31

 

 

August 31

 

 

 

2019

 

 

2018

 

 

 

$

 

 

$

 

Balance – Beginning

 

 

146,538

 

 

 

62,827

 

Addition

 

 

122,982

 

 

 

85,399

 

Amortization*

 

 

(4,393)

 

 

(1,688)

Balance – Ending

 

 

265,127

 

 

 

146,538

 

* The patents are amortized over their legal life of 20 years.

10.Property & Equipment

 

 

Cost

 

 

Period

Amortization

 

 

Accumulated Amortization

 

 

Net Balance

August 31, 2018

 

 

 

$

 

 

$

 

 

$

 

 

$

 

Equipment

 

 

3,094

 

 

 

(619)

 

 

(1,857)

 

 

1,237

 

 

 

 

3,094

 

 

 

(619)

 

 

(1,857)

 

 

1,237

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cost

 

 

Period

Amortization

 

 

Accumulated Amortization

 

 

Net Balance

August 31, 2019

 

 

 

$

 

 

$

 

 

$

 

 

$

 

Leasehold improvements

 

 

259,981

 

 

 

(33,342)

 

 

(33,342)

 

 

226,639

 

Computers

 

 

63,964

 

 

 

(12,187)

 

 

(12,187)

 

 

51,777

 

Furniture fixtures equipment

 

 

34,220

 

 

 

(4,205)

 

 

(6,062)

 

 

28,158

 

Lab equipment

 

 

291,235

 

 

 

(6,546)

 

 

(6,546)

 

 

284,689

 

 

 

 

649,400

 

 

 

(56,281)

 

 

(58,137)

 

 

591,263

 

11.Accounts Payable and Accrued Liabilities

 

 

August 31

 

 

August 31

 

 

 

2019

 

 

2018

 

 

 

$

 

 

$

 

Accounts Payable

 

 

 

 

 

 

Trades Payable

 

 

31,463

 

 

 

14,378

 

Sales Tax Payable

 

 

63,616

 

 

 

1,869

 

Accrued Liabilities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Trades Payable

 

 

41,332

 

 

 

19,538

 

Balance – Ending

 

 

136,411

 

 

 

35,785

 

12.Unearned Revenue

As at August 31, 2017, the Company’s granted patent has a priority date of June 10, 2014, a publish date of October 25, 2016, and protects the Company’s technology for twenty years.

On August 11, 2015, Lexaria signed a license agreement with PoViva Tea LLC for $10,000, granting Lexaria a 35-year non exclusive worldwide license to unencumbered use of PoViva Tea LLC’s IP Rights, including rights of resale. This license agreement ensures Lexaria has full access to the underlying patent pending infusion Technology.

Patents


   August 31  August 31 
   2017  2016 
   $  $ 
 Balance – Beginning 53,997  36,989 
 Additions 9,699  17,008 
 Amortization (869) - 
 Balance – Ending 62,827  53,997 

October 19, 2017, the Company received a new Notice of Allowance from the United States Patent and Trademark Office (“USPTO”) for the use of its technology as a delivery platform for all cannabinoids including THC; fat soluble vitamins; non steroidal anti-inflammatory pain medications (“NSAIDs”); and nicotine. Lexaria expects formal patent issuance within three to four months which is expected to provide protection until at least 2035. The patent application number is 15/225,799, “Food and Beverage Compositions Infused With Lipophilic Active Agents and Methods of Use Thereof”.

55



9.

Unearned Revenue

On May 14, 2016, the Company entered into a licensing agreement (the “Licensing Agreement”) with an arm’s length party (the “Licensee”) allowing the Licensee, for a two-year period, to utilize the Company’s Technology to create, test, manufacture, and sell marijuana-infused consumable and/or topical products, in the state of Colorado, with an option of extending the terms of the Licensing Agreement to Washington, Oregon, and California (the “Territorial License”). In addition to the granting of the license, the Company is required to provide support services to the Licensee in connection with the use of the Company’s Technology during the term of the Licensing Agreement.

 
Page 60 of 83
Table of Contents

The Company determined that the provision of the support services iswere a separate deliverable under the Licensing Agreement. As the support services will not be sold on a stand-alone basis, the Company is unable to establish a vendor-specific objective evidence of fair value of such services to be able to objectively allocate the Territorial License fee receipts between the license and the support services.licensing agreement. Accordingly, the Company recognizesrecognized revenue ratablyon a pro-rated basis over the term of the Licensing Agreement. As of August 31, 2017,agreement. The Company has since determined that the Company had received the full $50,000support services form an insignificant portion of the Territory License Fee.licensing contract as they are primarily completed prior to delivery of the technology and that delivery of the license is complete when the Technology is transferred to the Licensee. During the year ended August 31, 2017, $25,417 was2019, the Company recognized as$Nil (2018 $17,083) (Note 14), of unearned revenue.

August 31

2019

$

August 31

2018

$

Balance – Beginning

-

17,083

Earned revenue (Note 13) with the remaining $17,083 deferred for recognition in future periods.15)

-

(17,083)

Balance – Ending

-

-


   August 31  August 31 
   2017  2016 
   $  $ 
 Balance – Beginning 12,500  - 
 Territorial License fees received/receivable (Note 6) 30,000  20,000 
 Advance payments on product sales 4,900  - 
 Earned revenue (Note 13) (30,317) (7,500)
 Balance – Ending 17,083  12,500 

10.13.Common Shares and Warrants

Convertible Debenture

Fiscal 2019 Activity

On March 8, 2016, the Company closed a private placement offering of a convertible debenture in the aggregate amount of $45,000. The convertible debenture was to mature on August 31, 2020, with an interest rate of 10% per annum (on a simple basis) and was convertible at varying prices over time.

The Company determined that the conversion options did not qualify as derivatives as they did not meet the net settlement provision characteristics. The proceeds from the convertible debenture therefore were not bifurcated on the balance sheet.

During the year ended August 31, 2017,2019 the Company closed a non-brokered private placement for 947,150 Units priced at $1.60 each. Each Unit consists of one common share and one Share purchase warrant. Each warrant shall entitle the holder to acquire one common share at a price of $2.25 per Share for a period of 24 months. The Company also issued 28,175 broker warrants. The broker warrants have a term of 24 months and are each exercisable into one common share of the Company at a price of $2.25. The fair value of these broker warrants was determined to be $16,095, which were recorded as a share issue cost within additional paid interestin capital for a net effect of $4,500 (2016 - $2,250) in connection with the convertible debenture.$Nil.

As at August 31, 2017, the convertible debenture was converted into common shares for the amount of $45,000 at $0.15 per share for 300,000 common shares plus the accrued interest of $1,125 for 7,500 shares for

The company granted a total of 307,500 common shares issued on conversion.

56



11.

Common Shares and Warrants

Fiscal 2017 Activity

During September and October 2017 the Company received $93,500 of private placement receivable (Note 6) as at August 31, 2016.

On October 11, 2016, pursuant to its agreement with Docherty Management Ltd. (Note 16), the Company issued 252,000 common shares107,737 broker warrants with a value of $35,760.$6,484 that were recorded as a share issue cost within additional paid in capital for a net effect of $Nil.

On October 11, 2016,

The company granted a total of 100,00 warrants pursuant to the Advisory Agreement, the Company issued 750,000 warrantsan agreement with a vendor valued at $52,817 that were recorded as an exercise price of $0.14 per share and term of five years, in return for consulting services. The Company recognized the fair value of $32,252 from 250,000 of such warrants for services received duringexpense within investor relations.

During the year ended August 31, 2016,2018 the Company recognized $51,448 in consulting expense for warrants previously granted to a consultant upon vesting.

Fiscal 2018 Activity

On October 27, 2017 the Company extended the expiration date of warrants originally issued on January 9, 2017, with a one-year expiration date. The warrant quantity and further recognized $59,490 for the remainingexercise price remain unchanged, 500,000 warrants issued in return for consulting services received duringexercisable at $0.44, will now expire on January 9, 2019. There was a $Nil effect on the modification of the warrants.

During the year ended August 31, 2017.2018 the Company granted a total of 1,000,000 warrants with a fair value of $1,011,822 pursuant to consulting agreements signed during the year. The value of the warrants was recorded in consulting fees on the statement of operations. The company also granted a total of 35,913 warrants with a value of $21,646 which were recorded as a share issue cost within additional paid in capital for a net effect of $Nil.

During the year ended August 31, 2018 the Company recognized $51,448 in consulting expense for warrants previously granted to a consultant upon vesting.

Page 61 of 83
 
Table of Contents

A summary of share issuance is presented relating to option and warrant exercises, agreement requirements and debt settlement is presented below:

Type of Issuance

 

Number

of Shares

 

 

Total

Value

 

Warrant exercise(1)

 

 

1,626,513

 

 

 

796,122

 

Option exercise

 

 

430,000

 

 

 

66,250

 

Private placement

 

 

947,150

 

 

 

1,515,440

 

Per agreements(2)

 

 

250,000

 

 

 

234,500

 

 

 

 

3,253,663

 

 

$2,612,312

 

(1) Includes 384,212 broker warrants exercised for gross proceeds of $191,742

(2) The Company awarded the restricted common shares as required by consulting contracts

A continuity schedule for warrants is presented below:

 

 

Number of Warrants

 

 

Weighted

Average

Exercise

Price $

 

Balance August 31, 2017

 

 

8,844,506

 

 

 

0.29

 

Cancelled/Expired

 

 

(230,000)

 

 

0.17

 

Exercised

 

 

(6,364,145)

 

 

0.28

 

Issued

 

 

1,035,913

 

 

 

1.48

 

Balance August 31, 2018

 

 

3,286,274

 

 

 

0.72

 

Cancelled/Expired

 

 

(17,498)

 

 

0.59

 

Exercised

 

 

(1,626,513)

 

 

0.49

 

Issued

 

 

1,183,062

 

 

 

1.99

 

Balance August 31, 2019

 

 

2,825,325

 

 

 

1.38

 

The fair value of share purchase warrants granted as broker warrants, compensation units, and compensatory warrants, was estimated as of the date of the grant by using the Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following assumptions:

 

 

August 31

2019

 

August 31

2018

Expected volatility

 

1% – 117%

 

100% – 154%

Risk-free interest rate

 

2.31% – 2.87%

 

1.21% – 2.60%

Expected life

 

1 day – 2 years

 

1.21 – 3 years

Dividend yield

 

0.00%

 

0.00%

Estimated fair value per warrant

 

$Nil – $0.57

 

$0.40 – $1.48

A summary of warrants outstanding as of August 31, 2019 is presented below:

# of Warrants

 

 

Weighted Average Remaining

Contractual Life

 

Weighted Average

Exercise Price $

 

 

250,000

 

 

0.25 years

 

 

0.83

 

 

500,000

 

 

0.38 years

 

 

1.83

 

 

975,325

 

 

1.17 years

 

 

2.25

 

 

100,000

 

 

1.73 years

 

 

0.96

 

 

250,000

 

 

1.73 years

 

 

1.55

 

 

750,000

 

 

2.11 years

 

 

0.14

 

 

2,825,325

 

 

1.27 years

 

 

1.38

 

 

The Company reached an agreement with a director to settle the outstanding amount pursuant to an advisory agreement (Note 14), through issuancePage 62 of common shares of the Company.


DateAmount(2)SharesPrice
October 31, 2016(1)$16,000114,286$0.14
February 27, 2017$16,00029,091$0.55
May 31, 2017$12,00035,294$0.34
August 25, 2017$12,00032,433$0.37

(1) A Total of $8,000 of the $16,000 was recognized as consulting fees during the year ended August 31, 2016.
(2) There was a $NIL difference between the fair value of the shares issued and the carrying value of the debt.

On November 1, 2016, the Company issued 56,250 shares of its common stock for services amounting to $9,000, recognized within accounts payable and accrued liabilities as at August 31, 2016.

On November 1, 2016, the Company issued 500,000 warrants to a consultant. Each warrant entitles the consultant to purchase one common share of the Company at a price of $0.31 per share with a term expiring on May 31, 2017. The Company recognized $48,313, representing the fair value of such warrants.

During November, 2016, the Company provided to its warrant holders, an incentive for early exercise of their previously held warrants. Upon exercise of each warrant, in addition to the common shares of the Company, the warrant holders received a second warrant with identical terms to purchase one additional common share of the Company. The Company raised $737,508 from this early exercise warrant incentive program. A total of 3,245,000 warrants were exercised at a weighted average exercise price of $0.23 and the Company issued 3,245,000 common shares as well as 3,245,000 additional warrants to purchase common shares with an exercise price of $0.23 per share, expiring on May 14, 2017. The fair value of these additional warrants was determined to be $298,777, and is recorded within additional paid-in capital with a net effect of $nil.

On January 10, 2017, the Company issued 500,000 warrants to a consultant. Each warrant entitles the consultant to purchase one common share of the Company at a price of $0.44 per share with a term expiring on January 9, 2018. The Company recognized $112,725, representing the fair value of such warrants.

57


On April 3, 2017, the Company closed its brokered private placement of 4,104,280 units at a price per Unit of $0.42 for total gross proceeds of $1,723,798. Each Unit consists of one common share and one-half of one Share purchase warrant (2,052,140). Each whole Warrant entitles the holder to acquire one common share of the Company at a price of $0.60 per Share for a period of 24 months. The Agents received a cash commission of seven percent ($120,666) of the gross proceeds and 287,300 compensation units exercisable for a period of 24 months at an exercise price of $0.42 consisting of one common share and one half share purchase warrant. Each whole compensation warrant is exercisable for one common share at an exercise price of $0.60 for a period of 24 months following closing. The fair value of these compensation units was determined to be $64,162. There was $61,390 of other share issuance costs.

On June 19, 2017, pursuant to the agreement with Alex Blanchard Capital (Note 16) the Company issued 200,000 warrants exercisable at $0.29 for two years. The Company recognized $37,878, representing the fair value of such warrants.

On June 22, 2017, pursuant to the agreement with Mr. Chris Bunka (Note 16), the Company issued 210,000 common shares at $0.295 per share for $61,950, for services rendered as the Chief Executive Officer of the Company.

On June 22, 2017, pursuant to the agreement with Mr. John Docherty (Note 16), the Company issued 210,000 common shares at $0.295 per share for $61,950, for services rendered as the President of the Company.

On August 15, 2017, the Company issued 500,000 warrants to a consultant. Each warrant entitles the consultant to purchase one common share of the Company at a price of $0.44 per share with a term expiring on August 14, 2018. The Company recognized $34,344, representing the fair value of such warrants.

On August 25, 2017, the Company issued 307,500 shares at $0.15 per share of its common stock for the conversion of the convertible debt of $45,000 plus accrued interest of $1,125 (Note 10).

During the year ended August 31, 2017, a total of 1,014,125 incentive stock options were exercised for proceeds of $177,262. A total of 10,322,025 warrants were exercised for proceeds of $2,233,032, of which 3,245,000 warrants related to the early exercise warrant incentive program.

Fiscal 2016 Activity

On September 16, 2015, the Company’s Board appointed Ted McKechnie as a Director of the Company. Mr. McKechnie was issued 110,000 common shares of the Company valued at $19,000.

On December 10, 2015, Lexaria closed a private placement by issuing 550,000 units for gross proceeds of $90,000. Each unit consisted of one common share of the Company and one half transferable share purchase warrant. Each full warrant is exercisable into one further share at a price of $0.27 per share for a period of 24 months. A cash finders’ fee for $2,520 was paid to Leede Financial Markets Ltd.; and 15,400 broker warrants with an exercise price of $0.27 for a period of twenty-four months were also issued to Leede Financial Markets Ltd. The fair value of these broker warrants was determined to be $2,903.

On December 14, 2015, Lexaria signed an investor relations contract with Radius Consulting Inc. for a fee of $2,500 and 55,000 common shares of Company valued at $9,500.

On April 15, 2016, pursuant to the agreement with Mr. John Docherty (Note 16), the Company issued 210,000 common shares valued at $21,000, for services rendered as the President of the Company.

58


On April 15, 2016, the Company closed a private placement of 750,000 units at a price of $0.08 per unit for gross proceeds of $60,000. Each unit consisted of one common share of the Company and one non-transferrable share purchase warrant, entitling the holder to purchase one additional common share in the capital of the Company for a period of 18 months at an exercise price of $0.15 per share. The Company also issued 8,750 broker warrants to Haywood Securities Ltd. The broker warrants have a term of 18 months and are each exercisable into one common share of the Company at a price of $0.15. The fair value of these broker warrants was determined to be $805.

On June 6, 2016, the Company closed a private placement of 700,000 units priced at $0.11 per unit for gross proceeds of $77,000. Each unit consisted of one common share of the Company and one-half of a non-transferrable share purchase warrant with each warrant entitling the holder to purchase one additional common share of the Company for a period of three years at an exercise price of $0.14 per share.

On July 28, 2016, pursuant to an agreement, in return for marketing, branding, and investor relations advisory services, the Company issued 250,000 common shares of the Company valued at $0.12 per share (Note 16).

On August 10, 2016, the Company closed a private placement by issuing 1,558,525 units at a price of $0.06 per unit for gross proceeds of $93,512. Each unit consisted of one common share of the Company and one non-transferable share purchase warrant entitling the holder to purchase one additional common share in the capital of the Company for a period of 24 months at an exercise price of $0.14 per share.

On August 31, 2016, the Company completed a private placement by issuing 3,266,666 units at a price of $0.06 per unit for gross proceeds of $196,000, of which $93,500 was collected during September and October 2016. Each unit consisted of one common share of the Company and one transferable share purchase warrant. Each full warrant is exercisable into one further share at a price of $0.14 per share for a period of 24 months. A cash finders’ fee for $1,200 was paid and 50,000 broker warrants with an exercise price of $0.14 for a period of twenty-four months were also issued. The fair value of these broker warrants was determined to be $5,397.

A continuity schedule for warrants is presented below:

      Weighted Average 
   Number of  Exercise Price 
   Warrants  $ 
 Balance, August 31, 2015 19,840,186  0.23 
 Expired (13,978,286) 0.22 
 Issued 6,274,341  0.15 
 Balance, August 31, 2016 12,136,241  0.18 
 Cancelled/Expired (1,004,150) 0.22 
 Exercised (10,322,025) 0.23 
 Issued 8,034,440  0.36 
 Balance, August 31, 2017 8,844,506  0.29 

The fair value of share purchase warrants granted as broker warrants, compensation units, and compensatory warrants, was estimated as of the date of the grant by using the Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following assumptions:

  August 31August 31
  20172016
 Expected volatility102% - 138%237% - 240%
 Risk-free interest rate0.65% - 1.27%0.74% - 0.95%
 Expected life0.46 - 2 years1.5 – 2 years
 Dividend yield0.00%0.00%
 Estimated fair value per option$0.09 - $0.20$0.09 - $0.19

59


A summary of warrants outstanding as of August 31, 2017 is presented below:

# of WarrantsWeightedWeighted
 AverageAverage
 RemainingExercise Price
 Contractual Life$
625,0000.04 years0.15
290,4000.28 years0.27
500,0000.36 years0.23
450,0000.95 years0.14
2,839,6661.00 years0.14
2,052,1401.59 years0.60
287,3001.59 years0.42
350,0001.76 years0.14
750,0004.11 years0.14
200,0001.80 years0.29
500,0000.95 years0.44
8,844,5061.34 years0.29

12.

Stock Options

83
 
Table of Contents

14.Stock Options

The Company has established its 2007 Equity Incentive Plan, whereby the board of directors may grant up to 412,500 stock options to eligible employees and directors, the 2010 Stock Option Plan whereby the board of directors may, from time to time, grant up to 1,512,500 stock options to officers and employees, and its 2014 Stock Option Plan whereby the board of directors may, from time to time, grant up to 3,850,000 (post forward2,107,500 stock split)options to directors, officers, employees, and consultants, the Equity Incentive Plan whereby the board of directors may, from time to time, grant up to 7,838,713 stock options to directors, officers, employees, and consultants. Stock options granted must be exercised no later than five years from the date of grant or such lesser period as determined by the Company’s board of directors. The exercise price of an option is equal to or greater than the closing market price of the Company’s common shares on the day preceding the date of grant. The vesting terms of each grant are set by the board of directors.

Fiscal 20172019 Activity

The Company granted in the period ending August 31, 2019:

Quantity

 

 

Exercise Price $

 

 

Life (Years)

 

 

390,000(1)

 

 

1.27

 

 

 

5

 

 

240,000(1)

 

 

1.06

 

 

 

5

 

 

30,000(1)

 

 

1.16

 

 

 

5

 

 

350,000

 

 

 

0.99

 

 

 

5

 

 

440,000(1)

 

 

0.99

 

 

 

5

 

 

48,000(1)

 

 

0.96

 

 

 

5

 

 

100,000

 

 

 

0.81

 

 

 

5

 

 

450,000(1)

 

 

0.81

 

 

 

5

 

 

2,048,000

 

 

 

1.00

 

 

 

 

 

(1) Options granted vest over a period of three years

 

Fiscal 2018 Activity

On October 10, 2016, the

The Company granted 250,000in the period ending August 31, 2018, 200,000 stock options to a consultant for business advisory services. Thewith an exercise price of the stock options is $0.14 per share, vesting immediately$0.83 and expiring on October 10, 2018.

On June 2, 2017, the Company granted 200,000 stock optionsan expiration date of December 1, 2022 to an officer of the Company. The exercise price of theCompany, pursuant to an existing management contract and stock options is $0.37 per share, vesting immediately and expiring five years from the date of grant.

On June 21, 2017, the Company granted 300,000 stock options to a consultant, 100,000 vesting annually for 3 years, with an exercise price of $0.295$1.53 to directors, officers, employees and expiring five years fromconsultants that enable the option holders to purchase up to 1,725,000 common shares of the Company.

A continuity schedule for stock options is presented below:

 

 

 

Options

 

 

Weighted

Average

Exercise

Price $

 

 

Weighted

Average Remaining Contractual

Term (Years)

 

 

Aggregate

Intrinsic

Value $

 

Balance August 31, 2017

 

 

3,320,875

 

 

 

0.15

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Exercised

 

 

(545,875)

 

 

0.17

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Granted

 

 

2,025,000

 

 

 

1.49

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Balance August 31, 2018

 

 

4,800,000

 

 

 

0.71

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Expired/Cancelled

 

 

(1,415,000)

 

 

0.66

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Exercised

 

 

(430,000)

 

 

0.15

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Granted

 

 

2,048,000

 

 

 

1.00

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Balance August 31, 2019 (Outstanding)

 

 

5,003,000

 

 

 

0.89

 

 

 

3.34

 

 

 

791,800

 

Balance August 31, 2019 (Exercisable)

 

 

3,961,000

 

 

 

0.90

 

 

 

3.03

 

 

 

752,300

 

Page 63 of 83
Table of Contents

The fair value of options granted was estimated as of the date of grant. The company also granted 100,000 options to consultants vesting immediatelythe grant by using the Black-Scholes option pricing model with an exercise price of $0.295 and expiring five years from the date of grant.

During the year ended August 31, 2017, the Company also recorded $113,044 of stock based compensation in Consulting on the Income Statement of which $93,969 pertained to the stock options granted during the period and $19,075 being the recognition of expense from previous grants amortized from prepaid expenses. In 2016 the Company recorded $92,270 of stock based compensation in Consulting and $29,745 in Investor Relations on the Income Statement.

following assumptions:

60


Fiscal 2016 Activity

On September 16, 2015, the Company granted 110,000 stock options to a director of the Company. The exercise price of the stock options is $0.17, vesting immediately and expiring on September 16, 2020.

 

 

August 31

2019

 

 

August 31

2018

 

Expected volatility

 

100% – 144%

 

 

127% – 131%

 

Risk-free interest rate

 

1.42% – 2.89%

 

 

2.13% – 2.74%

 

Expected life

 

5 years

 

 

5 years

 

Dividend yield

 

0.00%

 

0.00%

Estimated fair value per option

 

$0.60 - $1.07

 

 

$0.70 – $1.73

 

On April 15, 2016, the Company granted 300,000 to an officer of the Company. The exercise price of the stock options is $0.11 per share, vesting immediately and expiring on April 15, 2021.

On June 3, 2016, the Company granted 325,000 stock options to a consultant, vesting immediately, with an exercise price of $0.14 and expiring five years from the date of grant.

A continuity schedule for stock options is presented below:

      Weighted Average 
   Number of Options  Exercise Price 
      $ 
 Balance, August 31, 2015 (vested and outstanding) 4,070,000  0.15 
 Expired (385,000) 0.32 
 Cancelled (935,000) 0.16 
 Granted 735,000  0.13 
 Balance, August 31, 2016 (vested and outstanding) 3,485,000  0.15 
 Exercised (1,014,125) 0.17 
 Granted 850,000  0.14 
 Balance, August 31, 2017 (outstanding) 3,320,875  0.15 
 Balance, August 31, 2017 (exercisable) 3,020,875  0.14 

The fair value of options granted was estimated as of the date of the grant by using the Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following assumptions:

 August 31August 31
 20172016
Expected volatility98% - 108%240% - 241%
Risk-free interest rate0.83% - 1.78%1.22% - 1.62%
Expected life2 - 5 years5 years
Dividend yield0.00%0.00%
Estimated fair value per option$0.07 - $0.27$0.11 - $0.19

A summary of the Company’s vested and outstanding stock options as at August 31, 2017 is presented below:

Number ofNumber of StockWeightedWeightedAggregate
Stock OptionsOptionsAverageAverageIntrinsic Value
 ExercisableRemainingExercise Price 
  Contractual Life$$
247,500247,5000.80 years0.0964,125
248,375248,3751.90 years0.2330,482
990,000990,0002.31 years0.10247,500
275,000275,0002.43 years0.0971,250
550,000550,0002.57 years0.09142,500
110,000110,0003.05 years0.1719,500
300,000300,0003.62 years0.1172,000
200,000200,0004.76 years0.37(4,000)
400,000100,0004.81 years0.3022,000
3,320,8753,020,8752.81 years0.15665,357

61



13.15.

Revenues


   August 31  August 31 
   2017  2016 
   $  $ 
        
 Product sales 16,866  31,743 
 Licensing revenue (Note 9) 45,809  7,500 
 Freight revenue 964  1,149 
 Other revenue -  326 
   63,639  40,718 

 

 

August 31

2019

$

 

 

August 31

2018

$

 

Product sales

 

 

24,282

 

 

 

16,967

 

Licensing revenue (Note 11)

 

 

198,000

 

 

 

415,183

 

Freight revenue

 

 

328

 

 

 

1,137

 

 

 

 

222,610

 

 

 

433,287

 

The Company recognizesrecognized licensing revenue on a pro-rated basis over the term of the Licensing Agreement (Note 9) and additional licensing fees as they arewere earned. As of August 31 2017The Company has determined that the company had received allsupport services form an insignificant portion of the pre-defined Licensing paymentslicensing contract as they are substantially completed prior to August 31 2017 for cash receiptsdelivery of $50,000the DehydraTECH™ technology (the Technology) and that delivery of Licensingthe license is complete when the Technology is transferred to the licensee. Additional licensing fees and $20,392 of additional fees.royalties are recognized as they are earned. During the year ended August 31, 2017, $25,4172019, the Company recognized $Nil of the $50,000 was included (2016 $7,500) on a pro-rated basisdeferred revenue (Note 12) and $20,392 (2016 $NIL)$198,000 of additional fees as licensing revenue.

Intellectual Property Licensing fees.
14.

Related Party Transactions

There was a slight increase in product sales in the current year compared to the previous years as the Company was able to solve some payment processing issues later in the fiscal year. The additional Licensing fees consist of IP licensing fees for transfer of the Technology with the signing of definitive agreements for the DehydraTECH technology. The additional Licensing fees include payments due upon transfer of the Technology and installment payments that are receivable within 12 months (Note 7).

For

16.Related Party Transactions

Management, consulting and

accounting services

 

Cash

$

 

 

%

 

 

Non-Cash(2)

$

 

 

%

 

 

Aug 31

2019

Total $

 

 

Cash

$

 

 

%

 

 

Non-Cash (2) $

 

 

%

 

 

Aug 31

2018

Total $

 

C.A.B Financial Services(1)

 

 

223,280

 

 

 

100

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

223,280

 

 

 

144,000

 

 

 

11

 

 

 

1,212,269

 

 

 

89

 

 

 

1,356,269

 

M&E Services Ltd.(1)

 

 

112,377

 

 

 

100

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

112,377

 

 

 

85,663

 

 

 

13

 

 

 

568,737

 

 

 

87

 

 

 

654,401

 

Docherty Management Limited(1)

 

 

195,740

 

 

 

100

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

195,740

 

 

 

140,471

 

 

 

11

 

 

 

1,148,152

 

 

 

89

 

 

 

1,288,622

 

Company controlled by a director

 

 

14,932

 

 

 

12

 

 

 

112,718

 

 

 

88

 

 

 

127,650

 

 

 

12,000

 

 

 

15

 

 

 

65,686

 

 

 

85

 

 

 

77,686

 

Directors

 

 

16,138

 

 

 

9

 

 

 

172,330

 

 

 

91

 

 

 

188,468

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

65,686

 

 

 

100

 

 

 

65,686

 

 

 

 

562,467

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

285,048

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

847,515

 

 

 

382,134

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

3,060,530

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

3,442,664

 

(1)C.A.B. Financial Services is owned by the CEO of the Company, M&E Services Ltd. is owned by the CFO of the Company (as of June 1 2017), and Docherty Management Limited is owned by the President of the Company.

(2)Stock Based Compensation (SBC) and Share Awards are included in the total value of the grants and awards included in expenses. In the year ended August 31, 2017,2019 the Company paid/accrued the following:


   August 31  August 31 
   2017  2016 
   $  $ 
        
 Management, consulting and accounting services:      
      C.A.B Financial Services (“CAB”)(1) 136,000  120,000 
      M&E Services Ltd. (“M&E”)(1) 54,963  30,794 
      Docherty Management Limited (“Docherty Management”)(1) 125,394  117,213 
      Company controlled by a director – consulting 48,000  8,000 
      BKB Management Ltd. (former CFO) -  44,767 
      Senior Vice President – Executive management consulting -  18,000 
   364,357  338,431 

(1)CAB is owned by the CEO of the Company, M&E is owned by the CFO of the Company, appointed June 1st 2017, and Docherty Management Limited (“Docherty Management”) is owned by the President of the Company.

  Common sharesFair valueCash
 Docherty Management (Note 11,16)(1)252,000$35,760$6,240
 Docherty Management (Note 11,16)(2)210,000$61,950$11,800
 CAB (Note 11,16)(2)210,000$61,950$11,800

(1) Issued in lieu of issuance of 300,000 common shares, as mutually agreed to between the parties.
(2) Issued in lieu of issuance of 250,000 common shares, as mutually agreed to between the parties.

62



Other transactions with related parties:

a) On July 25, 2016, the Company entered into a loan agreement with CAB for a principal amount of $50,000. Duringgranted no option or awards to officers and $285,048 awards to Directors included in Consulting expense. In the year ended August 31, 2017,2018 the Company repaidgranted a total of 1,700,000 incentive stock options to officers and directors of the full $50,000 principal to CABCompany with a fair value of $2,111,028 and also paid $1,515included in interest.Consulting expense (Note 14).

Page 64 of 83
 
Table of Contents

 

August 31, 2018

 

Common

Shares

 

 

Fair Value

 

 

Cash

 

Docherty Management (Note 13,16) (A)

 

 

345,250

 

 

$458,305

 

 

$164,361

 

CAB (Note 13,16)(B)

 

 

143,225

 

 

$192,195

 

 

$100,475

 

M&E Services Ltd (Note 13,16)

 

 

41,666

 

 

$34,166

 

 

 

-

 

(A) Issued in lieu of issuance of 466,666 common shares, as mutually agreed to between the parties.

(B) Issued in lieu of issuance of 216,670 common shares, as mutually agreed to between the parties.

b) During the year ended August 31, 2017, the Company sold $5,058 (2016 $NIL) of products to a director and an officer of the company and paid $1,341 in rent to an officer of the company.

Due to related parties:

As at August 31, 2017, $42,6902019, $48,096 (August 31, 20162018 - $331,371)$7,855) was payable to related parties included in due to related parties.

The related party transactions are recorded at the exchange amount established and agreed to between the related parties.

17.Segment Information
15.

Segment Information

The Company’s operations involve the development and usage, including licensing, of its proprietary nutrient infusion Technology. Lexaria is centrally managed and its chief operating decision makers, being the president and the CEO, use the consolidated and other financial information supplemented by revenue information by category of alternative health consumer products and technology licensing to make operational decisions and to assess the performance of the Company. The company has identified two reportable segments: Intellectual Property Licensing and Consumer Products. Licensing revenues are significantly concentrated on a single licensee.

three licensees.

 IP LicensingConsumer ProductsCorporateConsolidated Total
External Revenue45,80917,830-63,639
CoGS-29,750-29,750
Operating Expenses360,256120,9351,482,1621,963,354
Segment Loss(314,447)(132,856)(1,482,162)(1,929,465)
Total Assets62,82769,0302,728,3212,860,178

 

 

IP

Licensing

 

 

Consumer

Products

 

 

Corporate

 

 

Consolidated

Total

 

External Revenue

 

$198,000

 

 

$24,610

 

 

$-

 

 

$222,610

 

CoGS

 

$-

 

 

$(22,893)

 

$-

 

 

$(22,893)

Operating Expenses

 

$(1,211,733)

 

$(968,947)

 

$(2,177,450)

 

$(4,358,130)

Segment Loss

 

$(1,013,733)

 

$(967,230)

 

$(2,177,450)

 

$(4,158,413)

Total Assets

 

$645,969

 

 

$127,396

 

 

$1,901,854

 

 

$2,675,219

 

16.18.

Commitments, Significant Contracts and Contingencies

Management and Service Agreements

As at August 31, 2017,2019, the Company is party to the following contractual commitments:


Party

Party

Monthly Commitment

Expiry Date

C.A.B Financial Services(1) (2)(6)

          $12,000

November 30, 2018

CAD $29,167

January 1, 2022

Docherty Management Ltd.(1) (2)(6)

CAD $15,000$25,000

March

January 1, 20182022

M&E Services Ltd.(1)(2)

CAD $8,000$12,960

June 1, 20182021

Corporate Development(3)(4)

CAD $4,000$1,000

Month to Month

Corporate Development (3)(4)

Advisory Agreement

CAD $4,000$8,000

March 24, 2018

Month to Month

Investor relations and communications – Alex Blanchard Capital(1)

CAD $7,500

December 19, 2017

Month to Month

Office Management(7)

CAD $10,000

August 15, 2022

Research & Development

CAD $3,854

June 19, 2018

Month to Month

Office Rent(5)

CAD $4,823

November 15, 2023

63



Revenue Incentive Milestones

(1)

(1)100,000 common shares issuable upon the Company achieving non-refundable revenues of $200,000 to any single customer in any consecutive 60-day period for the first 12 months of the contract, plus a further 50,000 common shares issuable upon achieving non-refundable revenues of $200,000 to any single customer in any consecutive 60-day period, during the 13th - 24th months of the contract. If the Company achieves non-refundable revenues of $500,000 in any fiscal quarter, a further 200,000 common shares may be issuable during the first 12 months of the contract and 100,000 common shares during the 13th - 24th months of the contract.

Page 65 of 83
 
Table of Contents

Intellectual Property Milestones

(2)

(2)During the term of the agreement, for each provisional patent application substantively devised and successfully created, written, and filed with the U.S. Patent Office for the Company’s Technology, 250,000 restricted common shares of the Company will be issuable.

Corporate Development Milestones

(3)

For new customers sourced by a Consultant for the Consultant until July 10, 2017;first 12 months of the contract; for combined Lexaria Energy and ViPova products and including all combined sales efforts and/or technology licensing revenues, achieving non-refundable revenues of $200,000 to any single customer in any consecutive 60-day period would result in a restricted common share award of 100,000 Company shares (not achieved); and, from July 11, 2017, until July 10, 2018;during the 13th - 24th months of the contract; a restricted common share award of 50,000 Company shares may be achieved; this clause is limited to one payment per customer during the 12-month period, but payable on each customer that meets these sales/licensing thresholds.

(4)

(4)For new customers sourced by a Consultant for the Consultant until July 10, 2017;first 12 months of the contract; for combined Lexaria Energy and ViPova products and including all combined sales efforts and/or technology licensing revenues, achieving non-refundable revenues of $500,000 in any fiscal quarter would result in a restricted common share award of 200,000 Company shares (not achieved); and, from July 11, 2017, until July 10, 2018;during the 13th - 24th months of the contract; for combined Lexaria Energy and ViPova products and including all sales efforts, achieving non-refundable revenues of $500,000 in any fiscal quarter would result in a restricted common share award of 100,000 Company shares; this clause is limited to one payment per fiscal quarter.

Corporate Offices

(5)

 Corporate office and R&D lab space leased in Kelowna, British Columbia, Canada until November 15, 2023 with an option to extend an additional five years. Base rent is CDN$12.56 per square foot until November 14, 2019, CDN$12.86 per square foot until November 14, 2021 and CDN$13.21 per square foot until November 14, 2023 plus common area maintenance and taxes.

Performance Incentives

(6)

A performance bonus equal to 50% of the annual compensation may be payable upon the completion of certain performance criteria as determined by the board of directors of Lexaria. Compensation equal to 2% of the consideration received by the Company from the sale of a subsidiary, excluding certain circumstances. Certain compensation to be paid upon a change of control excluding certain circumstances and participation in the Company’s approved stock option plans.

(7)

Compensation equal to 0.4% of the consideration received by the Company from the sale of a subsidiary, excluding certain circumstances. Certain compensation to be paid upon a change of control excluding certain circumstances and participation in the Company’s approved stock option plans.

19.Prepaid Expenses

Prepaid expenses consist of the following at August 31, 2019 and August 31, 2018:

 

 

August 31

2019

$

 

 

August 31

2018

$

 

Advertising & Conferences

 

 

39,143

 

 

 

137,654

 

Consulting Fees

 

 

-

 

 

 

4,555

 

Office & Insurance

 

 

29,784

 

 

 

21,533

 

Legal Fees

 

 

-

 

 

 

29,990

 

 

 

 

68,927

 

 

 

193,732

 

 
17.

Income Tax

Page 66 of 83
 
Table of Contents

20.Income Tax

The following table reconciles the income tax benefit at the U.S. Federal statutory rate to income tax benefit at the Company’s effective tax rates as at August 31, 20172019 and 2016:2018:

 

 

August 31

2019

$

 

August 31

2018

$

 

Loss before taxes

 

(4,158,413

)

 

(6,609,187

)

Expected income tax recovery

 

(883,841

)

 

(1,322,068

)

Non-deductible items

 

8,544

 

2,724

Change in estimates

 

948

 

(54,057)

 

Effect of changes in foreign and long-term tax rates

 

-

 

1,816,659

 

Change in valuation allowance

 

874,349

 

(443,258

)

Total income taxes

 

-

 

-

Deferred taxes reflect the tax effects of temporary differences between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities for financial reporting purposes. Deferred tax assets at August 31, 2019 and 2018 are comprised of the following:


   August 31  August 31 
   2017  2016 
   $  $ 
        
 Loss before taxes (1,933,473) (1,277,249)
 Expected income tax recovery (676,716) (447,037)
 Non-deductible items 242,716  101,040 
 Change in estimates (174,135) (897,713)
 Change in valuation allowance 608,216  1,243,710 
 Total income taxes -  - 

Deferred taxes reflect the tax effects of temporary differences between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities for financial reporting purposes. Deferred tax assets at August 31, 2017 and 2016 are comprised of the following:

64


   August 31  August 31 
   2017  2016 
   $  $ 
        
 Non-capital losses 4,567,920  3,959,704 
 Valuation allowance (4, 567,920) (3,959,704)
 Net deferred tax assets recognized -  - 

The Company has net operating loss carryforwards of approximately $13,051,000 which may be carried forward to apply against future year income tax for U.S. tax purposes.

 

 

August 31

2019

$

 

 

August 31

2018

$

 

Non-capital losses

 

 

5,022,441

 

 

 

4,130,915

 

Marketable securities

 

 

2,300

 

 

 

1,789

 

Property plant and equipment

 

 

-

 

 

24

 

Total unrecognized deferred tax assets

 

 

5,024,741

 

 

 

4,132,728

 

  

Year Amount 
2025 76,000 
2026 508,000 
2027 1,056,000 
2028 720,000 
2029 753,000 
2030 552,000 
2031 538,000 
2032 252,000 
2033 344,000 
2034 3,257,000 
2035 2,268,000 
2036 989,000 
2037 1,738,000 
  13,051,000 

18.

The Company has net operating loss carry-forwards of approximately $24,457,000 which may be carried forward to apply against future year income tax for U.S. tax purposes.

Year

 

Amount

 

2025

 

 

76,000

 

2026

 

 

508,000

 

2027

 

 

1,056,000

 

2028

 

 

720,000

 

2029

 

 

753,000

 

2030

 

 

552,000

 

2031

 

 

538,000

 

2032

 

 

252,000

 

2033

 

 

344,000

 

2034

 

 

3,257,000

 

2035

 

 

1,934,000

 

2036

 

 

1,150,000

 

2037

 

 

1,857,000

 

Indefinite

 

 

11,249,000

 

 

 

 

24,246,000

 

Page 67 of 83
Table of Contents

21.Marketable Securities

The components of Marketable Securities were as follows:

 

 

Cost

Basis $

 

 

Unrealized

Gains $

 

 

Unrealized

Losses $

 

 

Total $

 

August 31, 2018

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Common Stock

 

 

25,000

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

(14,849)

 

 

 

Total

 

 

25,000

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

(14,849)

 

 

10,151

 

August 31, 2019

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Common Stock

 

 

81,250

 

 

 

9,335

 

 

 

(12,124)

 

 

 

Total

 

 

81,250

 

 

 

9,335

 

 

 

(26,973)

 

 

63,612

 

Unrealized losses from common stock are due to market price movements. Management does not believe any remaining unrealized losses represent other-than-temporary impairments based on our evaluation of available evidence.

22.

Subsequent Events

November 5, 2019 the Company pursuant to certain consulting agreements issued a total of 1,000,000 stock options at $0.55 per Share for a period of five years; and 225,000 warrants at $0.80 for a period of three years.

November 13, 2019 Lexaria closed the first tranche of its previously announced private placement. 1,554,245 units were issued at $0.45 for a total of $699,410.25.  Each unit consists of one common share and one warrant exercisable at $0.80 until November 13, 2020, thereafter at $1.20 until November 13, 2021.  The Company paid $3,937.50 and issued 8,750 broker warrants.

 
 
a)

On September 15th, 2017, the Company issued 625,000 sharesPage 68 of its common stock from the exercise of warrants previously granted for proceeds of $93,750. All warrants were exercised by third parties who are neither officers nor directors of the Company.

83
 
b)

On October 31st, 2017, the Company announced it received a NoticeTable of Allowance from the United States Patent and Trademark Office (“USPTO”) for the use of its technology as a delivery platform for all cannabinoids including THC; fat soluble vitamins; non steroidal anti-inflammatory pain medications (“NSAIDs”); and nicotine. The patent application number is 15/225,799, “Food and Beverage Compositions Infused With Lipophilic Active Agents and Methods of Use Thereof”.

c)

On November 2nd, 2017, the Company announced it acquired 100% ownership interest in its majority owned subsidiary PoViva Tea, LLC. The Company previously owned a 51% interest in PoViva Tea, LLC and acquired the remaining 49% interest. Compensation was US$70,000, a waiver on certain debts, and a 5%, 20-year royalty on net profits of ViPova TeaTMtea, coffee, and hot chocolate sales. No Lexaria stock or options were issued.

d)

On November 8th, 2017, the Company issued 419,250 shares of its common stock from the exercise of options and warrants previously granted for proceeds of $69,736. All options and warrants were exercised by third parties who are neither officers nor directors of the Company.

e)

On November 22nd, 2017, the Company issued 427,687 shares of its common stock from the exercise of warrants previously granted for proceeds of $129,416. All options and warrants were exercised by third parties who are neither officers nor directors of the Company.

Contents

65


Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure

There were no disagreements related to accounting principles or practices, financial statement disclosure, internal controls or auditing scope or procedure during the two fiscal years and their respective interim periods. The Company changed its registered public auditing firm for its fiscal year ending August 31, 2016 from MNP LLP (the “Former Auditor”) to Davidson and Company, LLP. There were no reservations nor any modified opinions expressed in the Former Auditor’s reports for the year ended August 31, 2015 or any of the previous fiscal years. The change in the Company’s public auditing firm was approved by the Company’s Audit Committee and the Board of Directors. There were no reportable events between the Company and the Former Auditors.

Item 9A. Controls and Procedures

Management’s Report on Disclosure Controls and Procedures

We maintain disclosure controls and procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in our reports filed under theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934,, as amended, is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission'sCommission’s rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our president and chief executive officer (also our principal executive officer) and our chief financial officer (also our principal financial and accounting officer) to allow for timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

As of August 31, 2017,2019, the end of our fiscal year covered by this report, we carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of our President and chief executive officer and chief financial officer (also our principal executive and financial reporting and accounting officers), of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures. Based on the foregoing, our president, chief executive officer and the chief financial officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were not effective, because of material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting, as of the end of the period covered by this annual report.report, as discussed below.

Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting

Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting. Responsibility, estimates and judgments by management are required to assess the expected benefits and related costs of control procedures. The objectives of internal control include providing management with reasonable, but not absolute, assurance that assets are safeguarded against loss from unauthorized use or disposition, and that transactions are executed in accordance with management’s authorization and recorded properly to permit the preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. Our management assessed the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of August 31, 2017.2019. In making this assessment, our management used the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (“COSO”) inInternal Control-Integrated Framework.Framework. Our management has concluded that, as of August 31, 2017,2019, our internal control over financial reporting is not effective in providing reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with US generally accepted accounting principles.principles due to the existence of material weaknesses. Our management reviewed the results of their assessment with our Board of Directors.

A material weakness is a deficiency, or a combination of deficiencies, in internal control over financial reporting, such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of our annual or interim financial statement will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis. Our management identified the following material weaknesses:

We did not complete documented internal control testing and did not document detailed risk assessment and sampling methodology.

We lack a specific written policy and procedure when dealing with a whistleblower complaint.

We lack detailed controls regarding the understanding and application of ASC 310 with respect to our treatment of “incurred credit losses”.

To address these material weaknesses, management performed additional analyses and other procedures to ensure that the financial statements included herein fairly present, in all material respects, our financial position, results of operations and cash flows for the periods presented. Accordingly, we believe that the financial statements included in this report fairly present, in all material respects, our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows for the periods presented.

Page 69 of 83
Table of Contents

Remediation

In response to these material weaknesses discussed above, we intend to: (1) increase our accounting personnel when funds are available which will also permit better segregation of duties; (2) we have appointed (August 15, 2019) an additional independent director to our audit committee; (3) Establish a formal Whistleblower policy and procedural document for our employees and consultants; and (4) review and update our controls and processes regarding ASC 310.

We will continue to monitor and evaluate the effectiveness of our internal controls and procedures over financial reporting on an ongoing basis and are committed to taking further action and implementing additional improvements as necessary and as funds allow.

This annual report does not includeincludes an adverse attestation report of our company’s registered public accounting firm regarding internal control over financial reporting. Management’s report was not subject to attestation by our Company’s registered public accounting firm pursuant to temporary rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission that permit our Company to provide only management’s report in this annual report.

Inherent limitations on effectivenessEffectiveness of controlsControls

Internal control over financial reporting has inherent limitations which include but is not limited to the use of independent professionals for advice and guidance, interpretation of existing and/or changing rules and principles, segregation of management duties, scale of organization, and personnel factors. Internal control over financial reporting is a process which involves human diligence and compliance and is subject to lapses in judgment and breakdowns resulting from human failures. Internal control over financial reporting also can be circumvented by collusion or improper management override. Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements on a timely basis, however these inherent limitations are known features of the financial reporting process and it is possible to design into the process safeguards to reduce, though not eliminate, this risk. Therefore, even those systems determined to be effective can provide only reasonable assurance with respect to financial statement preparation and presentation. Projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

66


Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

During the year ended August 31, 2019 our controls and controls processes during the period were updated and revised based on the additional personnel added to our company, their functions and regulatory requirements from Health Canada. The fundamental control processes remained consistent with prior years but were expanded for new operational areas, additional subsidiaries and enhanced through additional resources. There have been no changes in our internal controls over financial reporting that occurred during the year ended August 31, 20172019 that have materially or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal controls over financial reporting.

Item 9B. Other Information

None

None.

Page 70 of 83
Table of Contents

PART III

Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance

All directors of our company hold office until the next annual meeting of the security holders or until their successors have been elected and qualified. The officers of our company are appointed by our board of directors and hold office until their death, resignation or removal from office. Our directors and executive officers, their ages, positions held, and duration as such, are as follows:


Name


Position Held with our Company


Age

Age

Date FirstElected

Or Appointed

Date of

Resignation

Christopher Bunka

Chairman, Chief Executive Officer, and Director

56

58

October 26, 2006
February 14, 2007

-

John Docherty

President and

Director

47

49

April 15, 2015

-

April 29, 2016

-

Allan Spissinger

Interim

Chief Financial Officer

48

50

June 1, 2017

-

Nicholas Baxter

Director

64

Director

66

July 8, 2011

-

Ted McKenchnieMcKechnie

Director

70

Director

72

September 16, 2015

-

Brian Quigley

Director

46

August 14, 2019

-

Business Experience

The following is a brief account of the education and business experience of each director and executive officer during the past five years, indicating each person'sperson’s principal occupation during the period, and the name and principal business of the organization by which he was employed.

Mr. Christopher Bunka – Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and Director

Mr. Bunka has been Chairman of the Board and CEO since 2006 and was primarily responsible for the corporate pivot from older business activities to bioscience. Mr. Bunka is a serial entrepreneur and has been involved in several private and public companies since the late 1980’s. He was well known for more than a decade as a part-time business commentator in print and radio, as well as an author. He has extensive experience in the capital markets, corporate governance, project acquisition and corporate finance. He is a named inventor on some of Lexaria’s pending patents.

67


Since 1988, Mr. Bunka has been the CEO of CAB Financial Services Ltd., a private holding company located in Kelowna, Canada. He is a venture capitalist and corporate consultant.

Mr. Bunka was formerly Chairman/CEO of Enertopia Corp, (symbol ENRT-OTC) but resigned in 2013. Mr. Bunka was formerly a director of Defiance Capital Corp., (symbol DEF-TSXV) a Canadian resource company, but resigned in 2014.

Mr. John Docherty – President and Director

Mr. Docherty was appointed President of Lexaria effective April 15, 2015. Prior to Lexaria Mr. Docherty was former President and Chief Operating officer of Helix BioPharma Corp. (TSX: HBP), where he led the company’s pharmaceutical development programs for its plant and recombinantly derived therapeutic protein product candidates.

Mr. Docherty is a senior operations and management executive with over 20 years experience in the pharmaceutical and biopharmaceutical sectors. He has worked with large multinational companies and emerging, private and publicly held start-ups. At Helix, Mr. Docherty was also instrumental in the areas of investor/stakeholder relations, capital raising, capital markets development, strategic partnering, regulatory authority interactions and media relations, and he also served as a management member of its board of directors. Prior to this, Mr. Docherty was President and a board member of PharmaDerm Laboratories Ltd., a Canadian drug delivery company that developed unique microencapsulation formulation technologies for use with a range of active compounds.

Mr. Docherty has also held positions with companies such as Astra Pharma Inc., Nu-Pharm Inc. and PriceWaterhouseCoopers’ former global pharmaceutical industry consulting practice. He is a named inventor on issued and pending patents and he has a M.Sc. in pharmacology and a B.Sc. in Toxicology from the University of Toronto.

He has served as a director of Lexaria since April 29, 2016.

Mr. Allan Spissinger – Interim Chief Financial Officer

Prior to concentrating on finance and accounting, Mr. Spissinger worked within the Informational Technologies (IT) sector for over a decade; specializing in corporate IT infrastructure and software development projects. Mr. Spissinger joined the audit and assurance department at PricewaterhouseCoopers (PwC) where he obtained his Chartered Professional Accountant (CPA) designation focusing on financial reporting and Sarbanes-Oxley (SOX) compliance in the following sectors: resources, manufacturing and technologies. Mr. Spissinger joined Lexaria in September 2014 as a corporate controller. His positive mentorship, excellent communication and extensive leadership skills have enabled him to successfully manage a variety of private businesses for over 20 years.

Page 71 of 83
Table of Contents

Mr. Nicholas Baxter - Director

Mr. Baxter was appointed as a member on the board of directors of Lexaria Corp. in 2009. Mr. Baxter received a Bachelor of Science (Honours) from the University of Liverpool in 1975, and has worked on oil & gas projects in many areas of the world. Since the 1980’s, he has worked with companies in the public markets both in the U.K. and in Canada. Mr. Baxter brings extensive real-world experience as a board member.

Mr. Ted McKechnie – Director

Mr. McKechnie is a well-recognized thought leader in the Canadian food industry. In the past, Mr. McKechnie was president of Maple Leaf Foods, an owner and senior executive at Humpty Dumpty and a senior leader at Pepsi Co. After a distinguished career as an executive and marketer specializing in food manufacturing, he now focuses on moving the Canadian food sector into the future. Besides being the chairman of Food Starter’s board, Mr. McKechnie is also the Chairman/CEO of The Davies Group and William Davies Consulting Inc. Mr. McKechnie is also a chairman of the board for Advanced Technology For Food Manufacturing, and the Director of Lexaria Bioscience Corporation.

68


Mr. McKechnie is often called upon by think tanks, the government and industry leaders to offer insights on how to grow the food sector and add more value to the Canadian economy.

Mr. Brian Quigley - Director

Mr. Quigley has been a senior Consumer Packaged Goods executive for over 20 years of Brand Building, Marketing, Operations, Leadership and General Management experience leading business transformations that deliver shareholder returns for public and private equity investors. Mr. Quigley is one of the founders of Green Sky Strategy. Before founding Green Sky, he spent 16 years at the Altria Group, with 7 years as President & CEO for U.S. Smokeless Tobacco and Nu-Mark, Altria’s innovation Company. In his time at Altria, Brian spearheaded the companies Harm Reduction strategies and worked to deliver results by creating change in the U.S. Tobacco business. Prior to Altria, Brian held branding and leadership roles with several companies, including Pinnacle Foods Corporation, International Home Foods, which is now part of ConAgra, Inc., and in the advertising industry. Brian has launched dozens of new products, created consumer focused innovation strategies and built businesses and cultures that deliver results. Brian is motivated by helping to change lives with meaningful brands.

Family Relationships

There are no family relationships among any of our directors or officers.

Involvement in Certain Legal Proceedings

None of our directors, executive officers, promoters or control persons has been involved in any of the following events during the past five years:

1.   A petition under the Federal bankruptcy laws or any state insolvency law was filed by or against, or a receiver, fiscal agent or similar officer was appointed by a court for the business or property of such person, or any partnership in which he was a general partner at or within two years before the time of such filing, or any corporation or business association of which he was an executive officer at or within two years before the time of such filing;

2.   Such person was convicted in a criminal proceeding or is a named subject of a pending criminal proceeding (excluding traffic violations and other minor offenses);

3.   Such person was the subject of any order, judgment, or decree, not subsequently reversed, suspended or vacated, of any court of competent jurisdiction, permanently or temporarily enjoining him from, or otherwise limiting, the following activities:

a.A petition under the Federal bankruptcy laws or any state insolvency law was filed by or against, or a receiver, fiscal agent or similar officer was appointed by a court for the business or property of such person, or any partnership in which he was a general partner at or within two years before the time of such filing, or any corporation or business association of which he was an executive officer at or within two years before the time of such filing;

2)Such person was convicted in a criminal proceeding or is a named subject of a pending criminal proceeding (excluding traffic violations and other minor offenses);

3)Such person was the subject of any order, judgment, or decree, not subsequently reversed, suspended or vacated, of any court of competent jurisdiction, permanently or temporarily enjoining him from, or otherwise limiting, the following activities:

i.

Acting as a futures commission merchant, introducing broker, commodity trading advisor, commodity pool operator, floor broker, leverage transaction merchant, any other person regulated by the Commodity Futures Trading Commission, or an associated person of any of the foregoing, or as an investment adviser, underwriter, broker or dealer in securities, or as an affiliated person, director or employee of any investment company, bank, savings and loan association or insurance company, or engaging in or continuing any conduct or practice in connection with such activity

ii.

Engaging in any type of business practice; or

iii.

Engaging in any activity in connection with the purchase or sale of any security or commodity or in connection with any violation of Federal or State securities laws or Federal commodities laws;

4.   Such person was the subject of any order, judgment or decree, not subsequently reversed, suspended or vacated, of any Federal or State authority barring, suspending or otherwise limiting for more than 60 days the right of such person to engage in any activity described in paragraph (f)(3)(i) of this section, or to be associated with persons engaged in any such activity;

5.   Such person was found by a court of competent jurisdiction in a civil action or by the Commission to have violated any Federal or State securities law, and the judgment in such civil action or finding by the Commission has not been subsequently reversed, suspended, or vacated;

6.   Such person was found by a court of competent jurisdiction in a civil action or by the Commodity Futures Trading Commission to have violated any Federal commodities law, and the judgment in such civil action or finding by the Commodity Futures Trading Commission has not been subsequently reversed, suspended or vacated;

7.   Such person was the subject of, or a party to, any Federal or State judicial or administrative order, judgment, decree, or finding, not subsequently reversed, suspended or vacated, relating to an alleged violation of:

 
Page 72 of 83
Table of Contents

4)Such person was the subject of any order, judgment or decree, not subsequently reversed, suspended or vacated, of any Federal or State authority barring, suspending or otherwise limiting for more than 60 days the right of such person to engage in any activity described in paragraph (f)(3)(i) of this section, or to be associated with persons engaged in any such activity;

5)Such person was found by a court of competent jurisdiction in a civil action or by the Commission to have violated any Federal or State securities law, and the judgment in such civil action or finding by the Commission has not been subsequently reversed, suspended, or vacated;

6)Such person was found by a court of competent jurisdiction in a civil action or by the Commodity Futures Trading Commission to have violated any Federal commodities law, and the judgment in such civil action or finding by the Commodity Futures Trading Commission has not been subsequently reversed, suspended or vacated;

7)Such person was the subject of, or a party to, any Federal or State judicial or administrative order, judgment, decree, or finding, not subsequently reversed, suspended or vacated, relating to an alleged violation of:

i.

Any Federal or State securities or commodities law or regulation; or

69



ii.

Any law or regulation respecting financial institutions or insurance companies including, but not limited to, a temporary or permanent injunction, order of disgorgement or restitution, civil money penalty or temporary or permanent cease-and-desist order, or removal or prohibition order; or

iii.

Any law or regulation prohibiting mail or wire fraud or fraud in connection with any business entity; or

8.   Such person was the subject of, or a party to, any sanction or order, not subsequently reversed, suspended or vacated, of any self-regulatory organization (as defined in Section 3(a)(26) of the Exchange Act (15 U.S.C. 78c(a)(26))), any registered entity (as defined in Section 1(a)(29) of the Commodity Exchange Act (7 U.S.C. 1(a)(29))), or any equivalent exchange, association, entity or organization that has disciplinary authority over its members or persons associated with a member.

Compliance

8)Such person was the subject of, or a party to, any sanction or order, not subsequently reversed, suspended or vacated, of any self-regulatory organization (as defined in Section 3(a)(26) of the Exchange Act (15 U.S.C. 78c(a)(26))), any registered entity (as defined in Section 1(a)(29) of the Commodity Exchange Act (7 U.S.C. 1(a)(29))), or any equivalent exchange, association, entity or organization that has disciplinary authority over its members or persons associated with a member.

Delinquent Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934Reports

Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 requires our executive officers and directors and persons who own more than 10% of our common stock to file with the Securities and Exchange Commission initial statements of beneficial ownership, reports of changes in ownership and annual reports concerning their ownership of our common stock and other equity securities, on Forms 3, 4 and 5 respectively. Executive officers, directors and greater than 10% shareholders are required by the SEC regulations to furnish us with copies of all Section 16(a) reports that they file.

Based solely on our review of the copies of such forms received by us, or written representations from certain reporting persons, we believe that during fiscal year ended August 31, 2017,2019, all filing requirements applicable to our officers, directors and greater than 10% percent beneficial owners were complied with.

Code of Ethics

We adopted a Code of Ethics applicable to our senior financial officers and certain other finance executives, which is a "code“code of ethics"ethics” as defined by applicable rules of the SEC. Our Code of Ethics is attached as an exhibit to our Form SB-2 filed on September 20, 2007. If we make any amendments to our Code of Ethics other than technical, administrative, or other non-substantive amendments, or grant any waivers, including implicit waivers, from a provision of our Code of Ethics to our chief executive officer, chief financial officer, or certain other finance executives, we will disclose the nature of the amendment or waiver, its effective date and to whom it applies in a Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC.

Board and Committee Meetings

Our board of directors held onefour formal meetingmeetings and several informal meetings during the year ended August 31, 2017.2019. All proceedings of the board of directors were conducted by resolutions consented to in writing by all the directors and filed with the minutes of the proceedings of the directors. Such resolutions consented to in writing by the directors entitled to vote on that resolution at a meeting of the directors are, according to the Nevada General Corporate Law and our Bylaws, as valid and effective as if they had been passed at a meeting of the directors duly called and held.

Page 73 of 83
Table of Contents

Nomination Process

As of August 31, 2017,2019, we did not effect any material changes to the procedures by which our shareholders may recommend nominees to our board of directors. Our board of directors does not have a policy with regards to the consideration of any director candidates recommended by our shareholders. Our board of directors has determined that it is in the best position to evaluate our company’s requirements as well as the qualifications of each candidate when the board considers a nominee for a position on our board of directors. If shareholders wish to recommend candidates directly to our board, they may do so by sending communications to the president of our Company at the address on the cover of this annual report.

70


Audit Committee and Audit Committee Financial Expert

Currently our audit committee consists of our entire board of directors.Chris Bunka, Ted McKechnie and Nicholas Baxter. We currently do not have nominating, compensation committees or committees performing similar functions. There has not been any defined policy or procedure requirements for shareholders to submit recommendations or nomination for directors.

Our board of directors has determined that it does not have a member of its board of directors (audit committee) that qualifies as an "audit“audit committee financial expert"expert” as defined in Item 407(d)(5)(ii) of Regulation S-K, and is "independent"“independent” as the term is used in Item 7(d)(3)(iv) of Schedule 14A under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

We believe that the members of our board of directors are collectively capable of analyzing and evaluating our consolidated financial statements and understanding internal controls and procedures for financial reporting. We believe that retaining an independent director who would qualify as an "audit“audit committee financial expert"expert” would be overly costly and burdensome and is not warranted in our circumstances given the early stages of our development and the fact that we have not generated any material revenues to date. In addition, we currently do not have nominating, compensation or audit committees or committees performing similar functions nor do we have a written nominating, compensation or audit committee charter. Our board of directors does not believe that it is necessary to have such committees because it believes the functions of such committees can be adequately performed by our board of directors.

Item 11. Executive Compensation

The particulars of the compensation paid to the following persons:

(a)

a)

our principal executive officer;

(b)b)

each of our two most highly compensated executive officers who were serving as executive officers at the end of the years ended August 31, 20172019 and August 31, 2016;2018; and

(c)c)

up to two additional individuals for whom disclosure would have been provided under (b) but for the fact that the individual was not serving as our executive officer at the end of the years ended August 31, 20172019 and August 31, 2016,

2018,

who we will collectively refer to as the named executive officers of our Company, are set out in the following summary compensation table, except that no disclosure is provided for any named executive officer, other than our principal executive officers, whose total compensation did not exceed $100,000 for the respective fiscal year:

71



SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE


Name and
Principal
Position




Year




Salary
($)




Bonus
($)



Stock
Awards
($)




Awards
($)

Non-Equity
Incentive
Plan
Compensation
($)

Non-Qualified
Deferred
Compensation
Earnings
($)



All Other
Compensation
($)




Total
($)
Christopher
Bunka(1),
Chairman, Chief
Executive
Officer &
Director
2017
2016



-
-



-
-



61,950(7)
-



-
-



-
-



-
-



147,800
120,000



209,750
120,000



Bal Bhullar(2),
Chief Financial
Officer &
Director
2017
2016

-
-

-
-

-
-

-
-

-
-

-
-

-
44,767

-
44,767

Tom Irkhe(4)
Vice President
2017
2016
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
18,000
-
18,000
John Docherty(5)
President
2017
2016
-
-
-
-
97,710(6)
21,000
-
32,768(3)
-
-
-
-
143,434
117,213
241,144
170,981
Allan
Spissinger(8)
Interim Chief
Financial Officer
2017


-


-


-


54,204(9)


-


-


57,104


111,308



 
Page 74 of 83
Table of Contents

SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE

Name and Principal Position

 

Year

 

 

Salary

($)

 

 

Bonus

($)

 

 

Stock

Awards($)

 

 

Option Awards

($)

 

 

Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation($)

 

 

Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation Earnings

($)

 

 

All Other Compensation($)

 

 

Total

($)

 

Christopher Bunka(1),

 

 

2019

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

223,280

 

 

 

223,280

 

Chairman, Chief Executive

 

2018

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

292,669(4)

 

 

919,600(6)

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

144,000

 

 

 

1,356,269

 

Officer & Director

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

John Docherty(2)

 

2019

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

195,740

 

 

 

195,740

 

President & Director

 

2018

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

622,666(3)

 

 

525,486(6)

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

140,471

 

 

 

1,288,623

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Allan Spissinger(8)

 

 

2019

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

112,377

 

 

 

112,37765

 

Chief Financial Officer

 

2018

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

34,166(5)

 

 

534,571(6)(7)

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

85,663

 

 

 

654,400

 

(1)

Mr. Bunka was appointed as chairman, president, chief executive officer, and director on October 26, 2006, and was chief financial officer of our company from April 29, 2016 to May 31 2017. He resigned as president on April 15, 2015. We pay Mr. Bunka a consulting fee through CAB Financial Services Ltd., where he is also the Chief Executive Officer.

(2)
(2)

Ms. Bhullar was appointed Chief Financial Officer on May 12, 2009 and resigned April 29, 2016. We paid Ms. Bhullar consulting fees through her wholly owned company BKB Management Ltd.

(3)

The fair value of the stock options awarded was estimated using the Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following assumptions: expected volatility of 240%; risk-free interest rate of 1.22%; expected life of 5 years; and dividend yield of 0.00%.

(4)

Mr. Ihrke became Vice President on December 23, 2015 and resigned on March 8, 2016.

(5)

Mr. Docherty became President on April 15, 2015 and a director on April 29, 2016. We pay Mr. Docherty a consulting fee through his wholly owned company Docherty Management Ltd.

(3)
(6)

Pursuant to the agreement with Docherty Management Ltd. Mr. Docherty received 462,000 (2016466,666 (2017 - 210,000)462,000) common shares with a value of 97,710 (2016$622,666 (2017 - $21,000)$97,710).

(4)
(7)

Pursuant to the agreement with CAB Financial Services Ltd. Mr. Bunka received 210,000216,670 (2016 - NIL)210,000) common shares with a value of $61,950 (2016$292,670 (2017 - $NIL)$61,950).

(5)
(8)

Mr. Spissinger became Interim Chief Financial Officer on June 1, 2017.2017 and Chief Financial Officer June 1, 2018. We pay Mr. Spissinger a consulting fee through his wholly owned company M&E Services Ltd.

(6)
(9)

The fair value of the stock options awarded was estimated using the Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following assumptions: expected volatility of 102%130%; risk-free interest rate of 1.71%2.68%; expected life of 5 years; and dividend yield of 0%.

(7)The fair value of the stock options awarded was estimated using the Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following assumptions: expected volatility of 129%; risk-free interest rate of 2.13%; expected life of 5 years; and dividend yield of 0%.

72


Our company is currently paying consulting fees to our chief executive officer $12,000Chief Executive Officer CAD$29,167 per month, our presidentPresident CAD$15,00025,000 per month and our Interim Chief Financial Officer CAD$8,00012,960 per month in consulting fees.month.

Consulting Agreements

On December 1, 2016, the

The Company amended itshad an agreement with CAB Financial Services Ltd. Asfor a consulting fee of $144,000 per year and has negotiated a 3-year term renewal management contract with Chief Executive Officer for a revised consulting feeChris Bunka retroactively effective January 1, 2019. The annual compensation payable is CDN$350,000 per year and the following performance incentives.

·Performance Incentives

A performance bonus equal to 50% of $12,000 per month plus applicable taxes, superseding the previous agreement for $10,000 per month plus applicable taxes.

On May 12, 2009annual compensation may be payable upon the completion of certain performance criteria as determined by the board of directors of Lexaria. Compensation equal to 2% of the consideration received by the Company entered intofrom the sale of a consultingsubsidiary, excluding certain circumstances. Certain compensation to be paid upon a change of control excluding certain circumstances and participation in the Company’s approved stock option plans.

Page 75 of 83
Table of Contents

The Company appointed Mr. John Docherty as President of Lexaria effective April 15, 2015. The Company had an agreement with BKB Management Ltd. to act as the Chief Financial Officer and a Director. December 1, 2014, the Company entered into an updated consulting agreement for CAD$7,500 per month plus GST. Effective April 29, 2016, BKB Management Ltd. resigned its position and the contract was terminated.

On December 23, 2014, the Company entered into a revised Executive Management consulting agreement with Tom Ihrke for $3,000 per month. Effective March 8, 2016 Mr. Ihrke resigned and the contract was terminated.

On March 1, 2017, the Company executed a revised twenty four month consulting contract with Docherty Management Limited, solely owned by Mr. John Docherty to act as President with monthly compensation of CAD$15,000180,000 plus applicable taxes supersedingper year and has negotiated a 3-year term renewal management contract CAD$300,000 per year and the previous agreement with monthly compensation of CAD$12,500 plus applicable taxes.following performance incentives.

·Performance Incentives as defined above.

On June 1, 2017,2018, the Company executed a twelvethirty six month contract with M&E Services Ltd., a wholly owned company by Mr. Allan Spissinger, as interim Chief Financial Officer with monthly compensation of CAD$8,00012,000 plus applicable taxes, including an annual 8% increase, superseding the previous agreement for $8,000 per month plus applicable taxes.

Other than as set out in this annual report on Form 10-K we have not entered into any employment or consulting agreements with any of our current officers, directors or employees.

Grants of Plan-Based Awards Table

We did not grant any awards to our named executive officers in the during our fiscal year ended August 31, 2017.2019.

Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year End

The particulars of unexercised options, stock that has not vested and equity incentive plan awards for our named executive officers are set out in the following table:

73



OUTSTANDING EQUITY AWARDS AT FISCAL YEAR-END OUTSTANDING EQUITY AWARDS AT FISCAL YEAR-END

OUTSTANDING EQUITY AWARDS AT FISCAL YEAR-END

OPTION AWARDSSTOCK AWARDS

OPTION AWARDS

STOCK AWARDS













Name







Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options
Exercisable
(#)







Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options

(#)



Equity
Incentive
Plan
Awards:
Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Unearned
Options
(#)









Option
Exercise
Price

($)











Option
Expiration
Date



Number
of
Shares
or Units
of Stock
That
Have
Not
Vested

(#)




Market
Value of
Shares
or Units
of Stock
That
Have
Not
Vested
($)
Equity
Incentive
Plan
Awards:
Number of
Unearned
Shares,
Units or
Other
Rights
That
Have Not
Vested
(#)
Equity
Incentive
Plan
Awards:
Market or
Payout
Value of
Unearned
Shares,
Units or
Other Rights
That Have
Not Vested
(#)

Number of

Securities

Underlying Unexercised

Options

Exercisable

(#)

Number of

Securities

Underlying

Unexercised

Options

Unexercisable

(#)

Equity

Incentive

Plan

Awards:

Number of

Securities

Underlying Unexercised

Unearned

Options

(#)

Option

Exercise

Price

($)

Option

Expiration

Date

Number

of Shares

or Units

of Stock

That

Have Not

Vested

(#)

Market

Value of

Shares or

Units of

Stock That

Have Not

Vested

($)

Equity

Incentive

Plan

Awards:

Number of Unearned

Shares,

Units or

Other

Rights

That Have

Not Vested

(#)

Equity

Incentive

Plan

Awards:

Market or

Payout

Value of

Unearned

Shares,

Units or

Other Rights

That Have

Not Vested

(#)

Christopher
Bunka
550,000
247,500
-
-
$0.11
$0.10
2019/12/22
2018/06/18
-
-

700,000

-

-

$1.53

2023/05/31

-

-

-

John
Docherty
550,000
300,000
-
-
$0.10
$0.11
2020/03/26
2021/04/15
-
-

550,000

300,000

400,000

-

-

-

-

-

-

$0.10

$0.11

$1.53

2020/03/26

2021/04/15

2023/05/31

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

Tom Ihrke330,000-$0.112019/12/22-
Allan Spissinger200,000-$0.372022/06/01-

150,000

200,000

300,000

-

-

-

-

-

-

$0.37

$0.83

$1.53

2022/06/01

2022/11/30

2023/05/31

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

Option Exercises

During our fiscal year ended August 31, 2017, on January 9 2017,2019, Mr. Allan Spissinger exercised 27,50050,000 options previously granted at $0.10 prior to his being appointed interim CFO June 1 2017.$0.37.

Compensation of Directors

We do not have any

As of January 2019, we implemented agreements for compensating our directors for their services in their capacity as directors although such directors are expectedfor CAD$30,000 per year paid quarterly in the future to receive stock options to purchase sharesadvance. As of August 31, 2019, three of our common stock as awarded by our board of directors. We have an agreement with a directorDirectors are accepting compensation for marketing services that is not in their capacity as a director for $4,000 per month plus applicable taxes.services.

Page 76 of 83
Table of Contents

Pension, Retirement or Similar Benefit Plans

There are no arrangements or plans in which we provide pension, retirement or similar benefits for directors or executive officers. We have no material bonus or profit sharing plans pursuant to which cash or non-cash compensation is or may be paid to our directors or executive officers, except that stock options may be granted at the discretion of the board of directors or a committee thereof.

Indebtedness of Directors, Senior Officers, Executive Officers and Other Management

None of our directors or executive officers or any associate or affiliate of our company during the last two fiscal years is or has been indebted to our company by way of guarantee, support agreement, letter of credit or other similar agreement or understanding currently outstanding.

74


Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation

During 2017,2019, we did not have a compensation committee or another committee of the board of directors performing equivalent functions. Instead the entire board of directors performed the function of compensation committee. Our board of directors approved the executive and director compensation however, there were no deliberations relating to executive officerupdates with the entire board acting as the compensation during 2017.committee. Updated compensation is as disclosed in this Form 10-K.

Compensation Committee Report

None.

Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters

The following table sets forth, as of November 22, 2017,October 21, 2019, certain information with respect to the beneficial ownership of our common shares by each shareholder known by us to be the beneficial owner of more than 5% of our common shares, as well as by each of our current directors and executive officers as a group. Each person has sole voting and investment power with respect to the shares of common stock, except as otherwise indicated. Beneficial ownership consists of a direct interest in the shares of common stock, except as otherwise indicated.


Name and Address of Beneficial Owner
 Amount and Nature of
Beneficial Ownership
  Percentage
of Class
 
Christopher Bunka; Kelowna BC Canada 14,114,923(1) 19.97% 
Nicholas Baxter; Aberdeenshire, UK 330,000(2) 0.47% 
John Docherty; Toronto, Ontario 2,127,000(3) 3.03% 
Ted McKechnie; Toronto, Ontario 431,104(4) 0.62% 
Allan Spissinger; Langley, BC 227,500(5) 0.33% 
Directors and Executive Officers as a Group (5 persons) 17,230,527  24.42% 
David DeMartini, Texas, Houston 3,609,375  5.2% 
Total as a Group (6 persons)(6) 20,839,902  29.61% 

*           Less than 1%.

Name and Address of Beneficial Owner

 

Amount and
Nature of

Beneficial Ownership

 

 

Percentage
of Class

 

Christopher Bunka; Kelowna BC Canada

 

 

13,908,148(1)

 

 

17.65%

Nicholas Baxter; Aberdeenshire, UK*

 

 

480,000(2)

 

 

0.61%

John Docherty; Toronto, Ontario

 

 

2,872,250(3)

 

 

3.65%

Ted McKechnie; Toronto, Ontario*

 

 

545,738(4)

 

 

0.69%

Allan Spissinger; Langley, BC*

 

 

769,166(5)

 

 

0.98%

Brian Quigley; Richmond, VA*

 

 

100,000(6)

 

 

0.13%

Directors and Executive Officers as a Group (6 persons)

 

 

18,675,302

 

 

 

23.70%

(1)* Less than 1%

(1)Includes 5,631,8446,081,844 shares held in the name of C.A.B. Financial Services and 7,235,5797,126,304 shares held directly by Chris Bunka, chairman, chief executive officer and a director of our company.Company. Includes 450,000 warrants held directly by Chris Bunka with an exercise price of $0.14. Includes 247,000700,000 options which are exercisable at $0.09 and 550,000 options exercisable at $0.10.$1.53.

(2)

Includes 110,000 options which are exercisable at $0.10.$0.10 and 150,000 options exercisable at $0.99. Nicholas Baxter is a director of our company.Company.

(3)

Includes 550,000 options which are exercisable at $0.10, and 300,000 options which are exercisable at $0.11.$0.11, and 400,000 options exercisable at $1.53. John Docherty is the President and a Director of our Company

(4)

Includes 110,000 options exercisable at $0.17.$0.17 and 150,000 exercisable at $0.99. Ted McKechnie is a Director of our Company.

(5)

Includes 200,000150,000 options exercisable at $0.37.$0.37, 200,000 exercisable at $0.83 and 300,000 exercisable at $1.53. Allan Spissinger is interim chief financial officer of our company.Company.

(6)

Includes 100,000 options exercisable at $0.81. Brian Quigley is a Director of our Company.

(7) Under Rule 13d-3, a beneficial owner of a security includes any person who, directly or indirectly, through any contract, arrangement, understanding, relationship, or otherwise has or shares: (i) voting power, which includes the power to vote, or to direct the voting of shares; and (ii) investment power, which includes the power to dispose or direct the disposition of shares. Certain shares may be deemed to be beneficially owned by more than one person (if, for example, persons share the power to vote or the power to dispose of the shares). In addition, shares are deemed to be beneficially owned by a person if the person has the right to acquire the shares (for example, upon exercise of an option) within 60 days of the date as of which the information is provided. In computing the percentage ownership of any person, the amount of shares outstanding is deemed to include the amount of shares beneficially owned by such person (and only such person) by reason of these acquisition rights. As a result, the percentage of outstanding shares of any person as shown in this table does not necessarily reflect the person’s actual ownership or voting power with respect to the number of shares of common stock actually outstanding on November 22, 2017.5, 2019. As of November 22, 2017,5, 2019, there were 69,435,19878,787,134 shares of our common stock issued and outstanding.

75


Page 77 of 83
Table of Contents

Changes in Control

We are unaware of any contract or other arrangement the operation of which may at a subsequent date result in a change in control of our company.

Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence

Except as disclosed herein, no director, executive officer, shareholder holding at least 5% of shares of our common stock, or any family member thereof, had any material interest, direct or indirect, in any transaction, or proposed transaction since the year ended August 31, 2017,2019, in which the amount involved in the transaction exceeded or exceeds the lesser of $120,000 or one percent of the average of our total assets at the yearend for the last three completed fiscal years.

Director Independence

We currently act with fourfive directors, consisting of Christopher Bunka, John Docherty, Nicholas Baxter, Brian Quigley and Ted McKechnie. We have determined that Nicholas Baxter, is anTed McKechnie and Brian Quigley are “independent director”directors” as defined in NASDAQ Marketplace Rule 4200(a)(15).

Currently our audit committee consists of our entire board of directors.Chris Bunka, Ted McKechnie, Brian Quigley and Nicholas Baxter. We currently do not have nominating, compensation committees or committees performing similar functions. There has not been any defined policy or procedure requirements for shareholders to submit recommendations or nomination for directors.

Our board of directors has determined that it does not have a member of its audit committee who qualifies as an “audit committee financial expert” as defined in Item 407(d)(5)(ii) of Regulation S-K.

From inception to present date, we believe that the members of our audit committee and the board of directors have been and are collectively capable of analyzing and evaluating our financial statements and understanding internal controls and procedures for financial reporting.

We do not have a standing compensation or nominating committee, but our entire board of directors act in such capacity. We believe that our directors are capable of analyzing and evaluating our financial statements and understanding internal controls and procedures for financial reporting. Our directors do not believe that it is necessary to have an audit committee because we believe that the functions of an audit committee can be adequately performed by the board of directors. In addition, we believe that retaining additional independent directors who would qualify as an “audit committee financial expert” would be overly costly and burdensome and is not warranted in our circumstances given the early stages of our development.

76


Item 14. Principal Accounting Fees and Services

The aggregate fees billed for the most recently completed fiscal year ended August 31, 20172019 and for fiscal year ended August 31, 20162018 for professional services rendered by the principal accountant for the audit of our annual financial statements and review of the financial statements included in our quarterly reports on Form 10-Q and services that are normally provided by the accountant in connection with statutory and regulatory filings or engagements for these fiscal periods were as follows:

  Year Ended 
  August 31, 2017  August 31, 2016 
Audit Fees 35,392  38,186 
Audit Related Fees -  - 
Tax Fees 15,982  - 
All Other Fees -  - 
Total 51,374  38,186 

 

 

Year Ended

 

 

 

August 31,
2019

 

 

August 31,
2018

 

Audit Fees

 

 

61,787

 

 

 

39,972

 

Audit Related Fees

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

Tax Fees

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

All Other Fees

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

Total

 

 

61,787

 

 

 

39,972

 

Audit Fees: Audit fees consist of fees billed for professional services rendered for the audits of our financial statements, reviews of our interim financial statements included in quarterly reports, services performed in connection with filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission and related comfort letters and other services that are provided by the Company’s principal accountants for the fiscal years ended August 31, 20172019 and August 31, 20162018 in connection with statutory and regulatory filings or engagements.

Page 78 of 83
Table of Contents

Audit related Fees:Audit related fees consist of fees billed for assurance and related services by the Company’s principal accountant that are reasonably related to the performance of the audit or review of the Company’s financial statements, which are not included in the Audit Fees described above.

Tax Fees.Fees: Tax fees consist of fees billed for professional services for tax compliance, tax advice and tax planning. These services include assistance regarding federal, state and local tax compliance and consultation in connection with various transactions and acquisitions.

We do not use our principal accountants for services other than the ones related to the our annual audit and the review of our interim financial statements. We therefore do not involve our principal accountants for matters related to tax compliance and financial information system design and implementation. These services, which include corporate tax preparation and designing or implementing a system that aggregates source data underlying the financial statements or generates information that is significant to our financial statements, are provided internally or by other service providers.

Effective May 6, 2003, the Securities and Exchange Commission adopted rules that require that before our independent auditors are engaged by us to render any auditing or permitted non-audit related service, the engagement be:

·approved by our audit committee (which consists of our entire board of directors); or

·entered into pursuant to pre-approval policies and procedures established by the board of directors, provided the policies and procedures are detailed as to the particular service, the board of directors is informed of each service, and such policies and procedures do not include delegation of the board of directors’ responsibilities to management.

Our board of directors pre-approves all services provided by our independent auditors. All of the above services and fees were reviewed and approved by the board of directors either before or after the respective services were rendered.

Our board of directors has considered the nature and amount of fees billed by our independent auditors and believes that the provision of services for activities unrelated to the audit is compatible with maintaining our independent auditors’ independence.

77


Page 79 of 83
Table of Contents

PART IV

Item 15. Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules

a) Financial Statements

(a)

Financial Statements

1)
(1)

Financial statements for our Company are listed in the index under Item 8 of this document

2)
(2)

All financial statement schedules are omitted because they are not applicable, not material or the required information is shown in the financial statements or notes thereto.

b) Exhibits

Exhibit Number

Description

(2)

Plan of Acquisition, Reorganization, Arrangement, Liquidation or Succession

2.1

Plan of Conversion (included as Schedule “A” to the proxy statement/prospectus)

(3)*

Articles of Incorporation and Bylaws

3.1*

Articles of Incorporation

3.2*

Bylaws

(4)

Instruments Defining the Rights of Security Holders, including Indentures

4.1

2007 Equity Incentive Plan

4.2

2010 Equity Compensation Plan

4.3

2014 Stock Option Plan

4.4

Equity Incentive Plan

4.5

Specimen ordinary share certificate

(5)

Opinion regarding Legality

5.1

Opinion of Macdonald Tuskey regarding the legality of the securities being registered

(8)

Opinions regarding Tax Matters

8.1

Opinion of Dale Matheson Carr-Hilton Labonte LLP regarding U.S. tax matters

8.2

Opinion of Dale Matheson Carr-Hilton Labonte LLP regarding Canadian tax matters

Page 80 of 83
 
Table of Contents

(10)

Material Contracts

10.1

Enertopia Joint Venture Agreement dated May 27, 2014 with Lexaria (incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.1 of our Current Report on Form 8-K filed May 29, 2014)

10.2

Joint Venture Agreement dated March 5, 2014 with Enertopia Corp. et al. (incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.1 of our Current Report on Form 8-K filed March 5, 2014)

10.3

Share Purchase Agreement dated June 24, 2015 with Shaxon Enterprises Ltd. (incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.1 of Current Report on Form 8-K filed June 26, 2015)

10.4

Letter of Intent dated June 10, 2014 with Shaxon Enterprises (incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.1 of Current Report on Form 8-K filed June 12, 2015)

10.5

License Agreement dated August 11, 2015 with PoViva Tea LLC (incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.1 of Current Report on Form 8-K filed August 12, 2015)

10.6

Licensing Agreement dated May 14, 2016 of Lexaria Bioscience Corp. (incorporated by reference as exhibit 10.1 of our Current Report on Form 8-K filed May 20, 2016)

10.7

Services Agreement dated January 1, 2017 with Correlation Capital Inc.

10.8

Collaborative Research Agreement dated February 6, 2017 with National Research Counsel

10.9

Management Services Agreement dated June 19, 2017 with Dr. Phil Ainslie

10.10

Management Services Agreement dated June 1, 2017 with M&E Services Ltd. (Spissinger)

10.11

Membership Purchase Agreement dated October 23, 2017 with Marian Washington and Michele Reillo (incorporated by reference as exhibit 10.1 of our Current Report on Form 8-K filed November 2, 2017)

10.12

Consulting Agreement with JGRNT dated January 17, 2018 (incorporated by reference as exhibit 10.1 of our Current Report on Form 8-K filed January 22, 2018)

10.13

Licensing Agreement with Cannfections Group Inc. dated January 25, 2018 (incorporated by reference as exhibit 10.1 of our Current Report on Form 8-K filed January 25, 2018)

10.14

Licensing Agreement with Neutrisci International Corp. dated February 23, 2018 (incorporated by reference as exhibit 10.1 of our Current Report on Form 8-K filed March 2, 2018)

10.15

Licensing Agreement with Biolog, Inc. dated February 23, 2018 (incorporated by reference as exhibit 10.2 of our Current Report on Form 8-K filed March 2, 2018)

10.16

Form S-4/A Amendment No. 2 filed March 1, 2018

10.17

424B3 Notice Of Annual And Special Meeting Proxy Statement/Prospectus Summary

10.18

Licensing agreement with GP Holdings LLC dated April 20, 2018 (incorporated by reference as exhibit 10.1 of our Current Report on Form 8-K filed April 26, 2018)

10.19

Licensing agreement with Nuka Enterprises LLC dated April 24, 2018 (incorporated by reference as exhibit 10.1 of our Current Report on Form 8-K filed May 4, 2018)

10.20

Consulting contract with Nuka Enterprises, LLC dated May 25, 2018 (incorporated by reference as exhibit 10.1 of our Current Report on Form 8-K filed June 4, 2018)

10.21

Licensing Agreement with Hill Street Beverages Co. dated July 30, 2018 (incorporated by reference as exhibit 10.1 of our Current Report on Form 8-K filed August 2, 2018)

10.22

Investment Agreement with subsidiary of Altria Group, Inc. dated January 15, 2019 (incorporated by reference as exhibit 10.1 of our Current Report on Form 8-K filed January 22, 2019)

10.23

License Agreement with subsidiary of Altria Group, Inc. dated January 15, 2019 (incorporated by reference as exhibit 10.2 of our Current Report on Form 8-K filed January 22, 2019)

10.24

Amended and Restated Limited Liability Company Agreement of Lexaria Nicotine LLC with subsidiary of Altria Group, Inc. dated January 15, 2019 (incorporated by reference as exhibit 10.4 of our Current Report on Form 8-K filed January 22, 2019)

10.25

License Amendment Agreement Nuka with CanPharm dated May 15, 2019 (incorporated by reference as exhibit 10.5 of our Current Report on Form 10-Q filed July 8, 2019)

10.26

License Agreement Nuka with Lexaria Hemp Corp dated May 15, 2019 (incorporated by reference as exhibit 10.6 of our Current Report on Form 10-Q filed July 8, 2019)

10.27

Management Services Agreement dated January 1, 2019 with John Docherty KMSC (incorporated by reference as exhibit 10.1 of our Current Report on Form 10-Q filed July 8, 2019)

10.28

Management Services Agreement dated January 1, 2019 with Chris Bunka Bioscience (incorporated by reference as exhibit 10.2 of our Current Report on Form 10-Q filed July 8, 2019)

10.29

Management Services Agreement dated January 1, 2019 with John Docherty Nicotine (incorporated by reference as exhibit 10.3 of our Current Report on Form 10-Q filed July 8, 2019)

10.30

Management Services Agreement dated January 1, 2019 with Chris Bunka Nicotine (incorporated by reference as exhibit 10.4 of our Current Report on Form 10-Q filed July 8, 2019)

10.31

License Agreement dated June 24, 2019 with Universal Hemp

10.32

Joint Venture Agreement dated July 23, 2019 with Hill Street Beverages CanPharm

10.33

Joint Venture Agreement dated July 23, 2019 with Hill Street Beverages Hemp

10.34

License Agreement dated July 23, 2019 with Hill Street Beverages CanPharm

10.35

License Agreement dated July 23, 2019 with Hill Street Beverages Hemp

 
(b)

Exhibits


Exhibit No.Document DescriptionPage 81 of 83
(31)Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a)
Table of Contents

(21)

Subsidiaries

21.1

Lexaria Canpharm ULC, a British Columbia Canada corporation

21.2

Poviva Corp, a Nevada corporation

21.3

Lexaria Hemp Corp., a Delaware corporation

21.4

Lexaria Nicotine LLC, a Delaware corporation

21.5

Lexaria Canpharm Holding Corp., a Nevada corporation

21.6

Lexaria Pharma Corp., a Delaware corporation

(23)

Consents of Experts and Counsel

23.1

Consent of Macdonald Tuskey (Included in Exhibit 5.1)

23.2

Consent of Dale Matheson Carr-Hilton Labonte LLP (Included in Exhibit 8.1)

23.3

Consent of Dale Matheson Carr-Hilton Labonte LLP (Included in Exhibit 8.2)

23.4

Consent of Davidson & Company LLP, Chartered Professional Accountants

23.5

Consent of MNP LLP, Chartered Accountants

(31)

Rule 13(a) - 14 (a)/15(d) - 14(a)

31.1*

Section 302 Certifications under Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 of Principal Executive Officer

31.2*

Section 302 Certifications under Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 of Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer

(32)

Section 1350 Certifications

32.1*32.1

Section 906 Certification under Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002 of Principal Executive Officer

32.2*32.2

Section 906 Certification under Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002 of Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer

(101)**

Interactive Data Files

101.INS

XBRL Instance Document

101.SCH

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document

101. CAL

101.CAL

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document

101.DEF

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document

101.LAB

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document

101.PRE

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document


*Incorporated by reference to same exhibit filed with the Company’s Registration Statement on Form SB-2 dated January 10, 2006.

** Furnished herewith. Pursuant to Rule 406T of Regulation S-T, the Interactive Data Files on Exhibit 101 hereto are deemed not filed or part of any registration statement or prospectus for purposes of Sections 11 or 12 of the Securities Act of 1933, are deemed not filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, and otherwise are not subject to liability under those sections.

*Filed herewith.
Page 82 of 83
 
**

Furnished herewith. Pursuant to Rule 406TTable of Regulation S-T, the Interactive Data Files on Exhibit 101 hereto are deemed not filed or part of any registration statement or prospectus for purposes of Sections 11 or 12 of the Securities Act of 1933, are deemed not filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, and otherwise are not subject to liability under those sectionsContents

78


SIGNATURES

In accordance with Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act, the registrant caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

LEXARIA CORP.
By: /s/ Christopher Bunka
Christopher Bunka
Chief Executive Officer, Chairman and Director
(Principal Executive Officer)
Date: November 21, 2017

LEXARIA BIOSCIENCE CORP.

By: /s/ Christopher Bunka                                                  

Christopher Bunka

Chief Executive Officer, Chairman and Director

(Principal Executive Officer)

Date: November 14, 2019

In accordance with the Exchange Act, this Report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

By: /s/ Christopher Bunka                                                  

Christopher Bunka

Chief Executive Officer, Chairman and Director

(Principal Executive Officer)

Date: November 14, 2019

By: /s/ John Docherty                                                          

John Docherty

President and Director

Date: November 14, 2019

By: /s/ Allan Spissinger                                                       

Allan Spissinger CPA, CA

Chief Financial Officer

(Principal Financial Officer)

Date: November 14, 2019

By: /s/Ted McKechnie                                                        

Ted McKechnie

Director

Date: November 14, 2019

By: /s/Nicholas Baxter                                                         

Nicholas Baxter

Director

Date: November 14, 2019

By: /s/Brian Quigley                                                             

Brian Quigley

Director

Date: November 14, 2019

By: /s/ Christopher Bunka
Christopher Bunka
Chief Executive Officer, Chairman and Director
(Principal Executive Officer)
 
Date: November 21, 2017
By:/s/ John Docherty
John Docherty
President and Director
Date: November 21, 2017
By:/s/ Allan Spissinger
Allan Spissinger CPA, CA
Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Accounting Officer)
Date: November 21, 2017
By:/s/Ted McKechnie
Ted McKechnie
Director
Date: November 21, 2017

Page 83 of 83

79