UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K

(Mark One)

[X]

(Mark One)

ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the fiscal year endedAugust 31, 20172022

[   ]

or

TRANSITION REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from [     ][____] to [     ][____]

Commission file number000-52138

LEXARIA BIOSCIENCE CORP.

LEXARIA BIOSCIENCE CORP.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Nevada

20-2000871

(

State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)organization

(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

156 Valleyview Rd,

#100 – 740 McCurdy Road, Kelowna BC Canada

V1X 3M42P7

(Address of principal executive offices)

(Zip Code)

Registrant's telephone number, including area code:250-765-6424

Registrant’s Telephone number, including area code: 250-765-6424

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

Title of Each Class

Name of Each Exchange On Which Registered

N/A

N/A

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:

Common Stock, Par Value $0.001
(Title of class)

Title of Class

Trading Symbol(s)

Name of each exchange on which registered

Common Stock, Par Value $0.001

LEXX

Nasdaq

Warrants

LEXXW

Nasdaq

Indicate by check mark if the registrantregistered is a well-known seasonedseasonal issuer, as defined in Rule 405 the Securities Act.
Act Yes [   ]     No [X]

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act
Yes [   ]     No [X]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the

1


Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports) and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the last 90 days.
Yes [X]     No [   ]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically, and posted on its corporate Website, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-K (§229.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).
Yes [X]      No [   ]

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (§229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. [   ]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definition of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filer [   ]

Accelerated filer                   [   ]

Non-accelerated filer   [   ]

Smaller reporting company [X]

Emerging growth company [   ]

If an emerging growth company, indicate by a check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. [   ]Act ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
Yes [   ]     No [X]

The

As of February 28, 2022, the last day of the registrant’s most recently completed second fiscal quarter, the aggregate market value of Common Stockthe common stock held by non-affiliates of the Registrant on February 28, 2017registrant was $12,520,308approximately $21 million, based on the average of the high and low bid and askedclosing price of the Registrant’sregistrant’s shares of common stock on the OTC Bulletin Board or $0.545 on February 28, 2017. For purposes of this computation, all executive officers and directors have been deemed to be affiliates. Such determination should not be deemed to be an admission that such executive officers and directors are, in fact, affiliates of the Registrant.2022.

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the registrant’s classes of common stock as of the latest practicable date.

69,435,198

5,950,998 common shares as of November 22, 201725, 2022.

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

None.

2


TABLE OF CONTENTS

Item 1.
Business
4

 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Item 1.

Business

4

Item 1A.

Risk Factors

20

Item 1A.

Risk Factors

16

Item 1B.

Unresolved Staff Comments

29

23

Item 2.

Properties

29

23

Item 3.

Legal Proceedings

30

23

Item 4.

Mine Safety Disclosures

30

23

Item 5.

Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases ofEquity Securities

30

24

Item 6.

Selected Financial Data

33

25

Item 7.

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

34

25

Item 7A.

Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

41

30

Item 8.

Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

41

30

Item 9.

Changes in and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure

65

50

Item 9A.

Controls and Procedures

66

50

Item 9B.

Other Information

67

50

Item 10.

Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance

67

51

Item 11.

Executive Compensation

71

54

Item 12.

Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related StockholderMatters

75

58

Item 13.

Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence

76

59

Item 14.

Principal Accounting Fees and Services

77

59

Item 15.

Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules

78

60

2

Table of Contents

3


PART I

Item 1.       Business

Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements

This annual reportAnnual Report on Form 10-K (“this report”) contains forward-looking statements. These statements relateas that term is defined in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Any statements contained herein that are not statements of historical fact may be forward-looking statements relating to future events or our future financial performance.performance and are based on our present beliefs, assumptions, and information currently available to us. In some cases, youforward-looking statements can identify forward-looking statementsbe identified by terminology such as “may”, “will”, “should”, “could”, “targets”, “goal”, “expects”, “plans”, “anticipates”, “believes”, “estimates”, “predicts”, “potential” or “continue” and other comparable terminology or the negative of these terms or other comparable terminology. terms.

These statements are onlycontain predictions and involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors, including the risks in the section entitled “Risk Factors” set forth in Item 1(A) in this report, uncertainties and other factors that may cause our or our industry’s actual results, levels of activity, performance, achievements, or achievementsactual results to be materially different from any future results, levels of activity, performance, achievements, or achievementsresults expressed or implied by these forward-looking statements.

Although we believecontend that the expectations reflected in the forward-looking statementsherein are reasonable, we cannot guarantee future results, levels of activity, performance, achievements, or achievements. Exceptfuture result.

Forward-looking statements in this report include statements about, among other things: the status, progress and results of our research programs; our ability to obtain regulatory approvals for, and the level of market opportunity for, our product candidates; our business plans, strategies and objectives, including plans to pursue collaboration, licensing or other similar arrangements or transactions; our expectations regarding our liquidity and performance, including our expense levels, sources of capital and ability to maintain our operations as required by applicable law, includinga going concern; the securities lawscompetitive landscape of our industry; and general market, economic and political conditions.

We caution placing undue reliance on any forward-looking statements as they speak only as of the United States,date on which such statements were made, and we do not intendassume any obligation to update any forward-looking statement or to reflect the occurrence of an unanticipated event. New factors may emerge, and it is not possible to predict all factors that may affect our business and prospects. Further, management cannot assess the impact of each factor on the business or the extent to which any factor, or combination of factors, may cause actual results to differ materially from those contained in any forward-looking statementsstatements.

Solely for convenience, tradenames and trademarks referred to conform these statementsin this report appear without the “®” or “TM” symbols, but those references are not intended to actual results.

Lexaria’s consolidated financial statements are statedindicate, in United States Dollars (US$) and are prepared in accordance with United States Generally Accepted Accounting Principles.

In this annual report, unless otherwise specified, all dollar amounts are expressed in United States dollars and all references to “common shares” referany way, that we will not assert, to the sharesfullest extent under applicable law, our rights to these tradenames or trademarks, as applicable. All tradenames, trademarks, and service marks included or incorporated by reference in our common stock. References to “CAD$” refers to Canadian dollars.this report are the property of Lexaria Bioscience Corp.

As used in this current report, and unless otherwise indicated, the terms "we"“Lexaria” “we”, "us"“us”, "our"“our” and "our company"“Company” mean Lexaria Bioscience Corp., and/or our wholly owned subsidiary, Lexaria CanPharm Corp., a Canadian corporation, our 51% owned (100% as of October 2017) subsidiary PoViva Tea, LLC (“PoViva"), an entity incorporated in the state of Nevada, and our 50% ownership of Ambarii Trade Corporation (“Ambarii”), a Canadian corporation,subsidiaries, unless otherwise stated.indicated.

General and Historical

3

Table of Contents

PART 1

Item 1. Business

Company Overview of Our Business

The Company was formed on December 9, 2004 under

Lexaria Bioscience Corp. is a biotechnology company developing the lawsenhancement of the Statebioavailability of Nevada as an independent oila broad range of fat-soluble active molecules and gas company engaged in the exploration, developmentactive pharmaceutical ingredients (“APIs”) using our patented DehydraTECHTM drug delivery technology. DehydraTECH combines lipophilic molecules or APIs with specific long-chain fatty acids and acquisition of oil and gas properties in the United States and Canada. In March of 2014, the Company began its entry into the bioscience and alternative health and wellness business and discontinued its involvement in the oil and gas business in November 2014. In May 2016, the Company also commenced out-licensing its patented technology for improved delivery of bioactivecarrier compounds that promotes healthy ingestion methods, lower overall dosing and higher effectiveness in active molecule delivery. The Company has its office in Kelowna, BC, Canada.

Effective atimprove the opening of trading on October 28, 2009, our shares of common stock began trading on the Canadian Securities Exchange (formerly, Canadian National Stock Exchange) under the trading symbol “LXX”.

Our common stock is quoted on the OTCQB under the symbol "LXRP" and on the Canadian Securities Exchange under the symbol “LXX”.

In 2014, the Company submitted an application toway they enter the legal medical marijuana business in Canadabloodstream, increasing their effectiveness and also launched a hemp oil-based food supplement company in the USA.

The Company entered into a joint venture agreement with Enertopia Corp for a prospective medical marijuana business under the Canadian Marijuana for Medical Purposes Regulations (“MMPR”) for a 49% net ownership interest in the business (Enertopia 51%) utilizing an identified location in Burlington, Ontario. On September 15th, 2017, the Company issued 625,000 shares of its common stock from the exercise of warrants previously granted for proceeds of $93,750. All warrants were exercised by third parties who are neither officers nor directors of the Company.

4


On June 26, 2015, the Company entered into a definitive agreement with Enertopia Corp. and Shaxon Enterprises Ltd. to sell its 49% interest in the Burlington Joint Venture and the MMPR application number 10MMPR0610. Pursuant to the agreement, the joint venture received a non-refundable $10,000 deposit and is entitled to receive up to $1,500,000 in milestone payments upon the Burlington facility becoming licensed under the MMPR. All payments made pursuant to the agreement would be divided 51% to Enertopia Corp. and 49% to Lexaria Bioscience. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Company can neither guarantee nor provide a meaningful time estimate regarding the grant of a production license for the Burlington facility.

The Company’s food sciences activities include the development of our proprietary nutrient infusion technologies for the production of superfoods, and the production of enhanced food products under our two consumer product brands, ViPova™ and Lexaria Energy™. The Company’s patented lipid nutrient infusion technology DehydraTECHTM is believed to improve taste, rapidity and delivery of bioactive compounds that include cannabinoids, vitamins NSAIDs Nicotine and other molecules compared to what is possible without lipophilic enhancement technology. This can allowallowing for lower overall dosing requirements and/while promoting healthier oral ingestion methods.

DehydraTECH can be used with a wide range of active molecules encompassing fat-soluble vitamins, pain medications, hormones, PDE5 inhibitors, antivirals, nicotine and its analogs, and all cannabinoids. Our technology can be applied to a variety of therapeutic indications, including hypertension and heart disease, dementia, SARS-CoV-2/COVID-19 and HIV/AIDS. DehydraTECH can be implemented in a multitude of ingestible or higher effectiveness intopically administered product formats including foods, beverages, oral suspensions, tablets, capsules, creams, lotions, and skin patches. It is suitable for use with a variety of product formats including pharmaceuticals, nutraceuticals, over-the-counter and consumer packaged goods.

DehydraTECH is a technology incorporated into the formulation and manufacturing process of new or existing orally ingestible and topical products. The procedure involves fusing the active molecule delivery. Lexariaingredient as a delivery “payload” together with certain fatty acids and infusing the mixture into a substrate material. Using controlled dehydration synthesis, it combines the payload and fatty acids together at a molecular level. The newly combined molecules are then integrated into production of the end-product using any number of dosage formats. From foods and beverages to cosmetics and nutraceuticals, this technology extends across many product categories beyond the primary pharmaceutical focus of the Company. DehydraTECH formulations have been found to reduce the need for unwanted sweeteners or chemical masking agents used for flavor and odor blocking allowing manufacturers to create low-sugar products with fewer calories and artificial sweeteners.

The Company has causeddeveloped a variety of demonstration products since 2015 exhibiting the potential uses for DehydraTECH to be filed several patent pending applicationsboth consumers and potential licensees. These products included hot chocolate, coffee, seven flavors of teas, two flavors of protein energy bars, powder filled capsules and mix-and-serve powders. All utilized DehydraTECH for a more palatable and efficient delivery of bioactive molecules. The Company gained extensive experience from the formulation and production of these products that enables us to provide expert advice to our licensees with the US Patent Office, and also internationally under the Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT). On October 26, 2016, the USPTO issued U.S. Patent No. 9,474,725 (granted June 15 2017integration of DehydraTECH in Australia No. 2015274698), Cannabinoid Infused Food and Beverage Compositions and Methodstheir products.

Lexaria does not intend to create or produce consumer products. A part of Use Thereof, pertaining to Lexaria’s method of improving bioavailability and taste of certain cannabinoid lipophilic active agents in food products. Lexaria hopes to reduce other common but less healthy ingestion methods, such as smoking, as it embraces the benefits of its technology for public health.

As at August 31, 2017, we only had one reportable segment, being the development and usage, including licensing of our proprietary nutrient infusion technology.

We maintain our registered agent's office and our U.S. business office at Nevada Agency and Transfer Company, 50 West Liberty, Suite 880, Reno, Nevada 89501. Our telephone number is (755) 322-0626.

The address of our principal executive office is 156 Valleyview Rd, Kelowna BC Canada V1X3M4. We have administrative functions located in Vancouver, British Columbia and Phoenix, Arizona.

Our Current Business

Our company’s business plan is currently focused onto encourage new and existing participants to license and utilize DehydraTECH to enable enhanced performance of their products. These products cross a wide range of lipophilic bioactive molecules including CBD with additional molecules of interest continually being evaluated.

Intellectual Property

DehydraTECH dates back to 2014 with two initial US provisional patent application filings made by the developmentoriginal inventors Poppy’s Teas LLC, which Lexaria acquired by way of strategic partnerships with licensees for our patented technology in exchange for up front and/or staged licensing fees over time. Secondarily and more generally, we continueexclusive, worldwide license rights to investigate national and international opportunities for development and distributionDehydraTECH via the acquisition of the Company’s enhanced functional food and supplement product offerings;controlling interest in the founding company. In 2015, Lexaria signed a license agreement with PoViva Corp. (formerly PoViva Tea LLC) granting Lexaria a 35-year non-exclusive worldwide license to investigate expansions and additions to ourunencumbered use of PoViva Tea LLC’s intellectual property portfolio; and, to search for additional opportunities in alternative health sectors.rights, including rights of resale. This includes the acquisition or development of intellectual property if and when we believe it advisable to do so. We announced issuance of our first patent by the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) on October 26, 2016 and have received a Notice of Acceptance from the Australian Patent Office with related patent issuance date June 15 2017 No. 2015274698. We announced on November 2, 2017 a new Notice of Allowance from the USPTO that included the delivery of additional molecules such as psychoactive cannabinoids, vitamins, non-steroidal anti-inflammatories, and nicotine all utilizing our DehydraTECHTM delivery technology. We are seeking additional patent protection for what we believe to be a unique process for the nutritional delivery of certain molecules such as cannabinoids, Nicotine, Non-Steroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs (NSAIDs), and Vitamins. To achieve sustainable and profitable growth, our company intends to control the timing and costs of our projects wherever possible.

During the past fiscal year the Company experienced the following significant corporate developments:

On September 8th, 2016, the Company announced signing new definitive technology licensing and private label agreements.license agreement ensures Lexaria will earn a pre-defined premium to costs on all raw ingredient sourcing and manufacturing, and will further earn a pre-defined royalty rate on all gross product sales revenues earned by Timeless Herbal Care Limited. The agreement is for an initial term of 5 years. No business activity has occurred as yet under this agreement.

On October 11, 2016, in exchange of business advisory services including marketing strategies and assistance in preparing presentation materials, dissemination of information and other business and capital advisory services, the Company granted 250,000 stock options to a consultant with a strike price of $0.14 per share, and expiry term of two years. The Company also paid a compensation of CAD$5,000full access to the consultant. This contract was terminated December 12, 2016.

5


On October 11, 2016, pursuant to its agreement with Docherty Management Ltd., the Company issued 252,000 restricted common shares and cash compensation of $6,240.

On October 11, 2016, the Company issued 750,000 warrants with an exercise price of $0.14 per share and valid for five years, in return for consulting services provided in August, September, and October.

On October 11, 2016, the Company reached an agreement with a director to settle the outstanding amount pursuant to a advisory agreement with him, through issuance of common shares of the Company. To settle the outstanding amount of $16,000 for four months to October 31, 2016, the Company issued 114,286 shares of its common stock at a value of $0.14 per share.

On October 11, 2016, the Company retained a consultant to provide market maintenance service for the Company in compliance with regulatory guidelines.underlying infusion technology. The consultant trades shares of the Company on the Canadian Securities Exchange for purposes of maintaining a reasonable market and improving the liquidity of Lexaria’s shares.

On October 16, 2016, the Company received $12,500 from exercise of 55,000 stock options.

On October 26, 2016, the Company announced the USPTO issued U.S. Patent No. 9,474,725, Cannabinoid Infused Food and Beverage Compositions and Methods of Use Thereof, pertaining to Lexaria’s method of improving bioavailability and taste of certain cannabinoid lipophilic active agents in food products.

On October 27, 2016, the Company received approval to offer existing warrant holders an incentive to exercise warrants early. For each exercise, in addition to the shares, the warrant holders were offered an additional warrant with identical terms. During the period ended February 28, 2017, a total of 3,245,000 warrants were exercised at a weighted average price of $0.2273 and the Company issued 3,245,000 common shares and 3,245,000 warrants with a weighted average exercise price of $0.2273 to buy one additional common share of the Company, expiring May 14, 2017. Total proceeds raised from such incentive amounted to $737,500.

On November 1, 2016, the Company issued 56,250 shares of its common stock in settlement of $9,000, recognized within accounts payable and accrued liabilities as at August 31, 2016.

On November 1, 2016, the Company received $37,505 from exercise of 165,000 share purchase warrants.

On November 1, 2016, the Company issued 500,000 warrants to a consultant. Each warrant is valid for purchase of one new common share of the Company at a price of $0.31 per share with and expiration date of May 31, 2017.

On November 16, 2016, the Company received $50,003 from exercise of 220,000 share purchase warrants.

On November 21, 2016, the Company received $50,000 from exercise of 220,000 share purchase warrants.

On November 22, 2016, the Company signed a Memorandum of Understanding with NeutriSci International Inc. (“NeutriSci”) for forming a 50/50 joint venture to develop, produce, and sell a line of healthy edible cannabinoid products using Lexaria’s patented technology and NeutriSci proprietary pterostilbene tablet formula and international distribution network. The joint venture expects to commercialize any newly created cannabinoid edible products through distribution programs and existing strategic partners. Product development is underway and a joint venture subsidiary has been formed.

On November 29, 2016, the Company announced the entry of a letter of intent for the licensing of its proprietary absorption and palatability enhancing technology to Hempco Food and Fiber Inc. (“Hempco”). It was expected that the letter of intent would advance into a definitive agreement, however Hempco has since been majority acquired by another firm and our letter of intent has expired although casual business discussions remain.

6


On December 1, 2016, the Company amended its agreement with CAB for a revised consulting fee of $12,000 per month. The term of the amended agreement is two years but can be terminated by either party by providing two months notice.

On December 19, 2016, the Company filed to internationally expand its U.S patent number 9474725, granted on October 26, 2016. National filing patent applications in Canada, Australia, Japan, China, India and all 37 countries belonging to the European Patent Convention were filed. All of these filings follow the Company’s initial international Patent Cooperation Treaty patent application.

On December 22, 2016, the Company extended the services of Frontier Merchant Capital Group (“Frontier”) for a period of three months, for a total fee of CAD$25,000. Frontier will assist the Company by increasing market awareness utilizing a number of financial market communication initiatives including media outreach, facilitating in-person introduction for the Company with institutional and retail brokers and investors in cities across Canada and the U.S., and more.

On January 10, 2017, the Company issued 500,000 incentive warrants to an arm’s length party in exchange for corporate development services. The exercise price of the incentive warrants is $0.44, vesting immediately, and expiring on January 9, 2018. The expiry date of these warrants has since been extended by one year, to January 9, 2019.

On January 19, 2017, the Company and NeutriSci International Inc. (“NeutriSci”) announced the successful development and initial trial of the industry’s first zero-sugar cannabinoid / pterostilbene edible tablet utilizing both NeutriSci’s and Lexaria’s proprietary and patented technologies. NeutriSci and Lexaria confirmed that the companies expect to officially bind the JV agreement to market and commercialize a line of edible products. Product development is continuing.

On February 8, 2017, the Company through its wholly owned Canadian subsidiary Lexaria CanPharm Corp., signed and entered a master collaborative research agreement with the National Research Council of Canada (“NRC”) to investigate technical aspects and new opportunities associated with bioavailability enhancement of lipophilic active ingredient compositions. Under the agreement, the Company and the NRC will both provide up to CAD$125,000 in funding for this research, a total investment of up to CAD$250,000. The master research agreement has an 18-month term, during which a number of shorter-term studies will be undertaken. The collaboration will investigate and define the chemical nature of the molecular association that Lexaria`s patented technology is believed to effectuate between lipophilic active agents and fatty acids as solubility and bioavailability enhancing agents. The first phase of research under this agreement was underway as of August 31, 2017.

On February 8, 2017, the Company issued 29,091 shares of its common stock in settlement of $16,000 service fee, previously recognized within accounts payable and accrued liabilities.

On February 27, 2017, the Company received a Notice of Acceptance from the Australian Patent Office that Lexaria’s Australian patent application 2015274698 was accepted with a patent issuance date expected in June, 2017. The Notice of Acceptance covers Lexaria patent application entitled “Food and beverage compositions infused with lipophilic active agents and methods of use thereof”, which has been accepted with the same set of claims previously issued in US Patent No 9,474,725 specific to non-psychoactive cannabinoids. Subsequently the Company received a Certificate of Grant for a Standard Patent No. 2015274698 dated June 15 2017 with a twenty year term.

On March 14, 2017, the Company commenced the formal design phase for studies to be conducted under the master collaborative research agreement with the NRC. A number of studies have been proposed and are currently being evaluated, with the intention to begin work and produce results over multiple intervals in the coming months. As noted above, the first phase of research under this agreement was underway as of August 31, 2017. In aggregate, results from these studies will add to the understanding of the physical and biochemical characteristics imparted on molecules that have been subjected to Lexaria’s technology, with a view to further demonstrating the power of the technology to prospective commercial partners across the various consumer product sectors the Company is targeting.

On March 24, 2017, the Company executed a twelve month marketing and lead generation campaign with Dig Media Inc. Investing News Network for $48,000.

7


On April 27, 2017, the Company issued 1,075,000 shares of its common stock from the exercise of warrants previously granted for proceeds of $242,047.50. All warrants were exercised by third parties who are neither officers nor directors of the Company.

On June 1st, 2017, the Company appointed Mr. Allan Spissinger as acting CFO, Corporate Secretary and Treasurer. The Company executed a twelve month consulting contract with M&E Services Ltd., solely owned by Mr. Allan Spissinger with monthly compensation of CAD$8,000. The Company may pay Mr. Spissinger a bonus from time to time, at its sole discretion. Mr. Spissinger was awarded 200,000 incentive stock options exercisable at $0.37 vesting immediately.

On June 19th, 2017, the Company entered into an agreement with a third party researcher for CAD$3,854 per month for a period of twelve months and continuing month to month and may be terminated thereafter with sixty days’ notice.

On June 19th, 2017, the Company executed a contract with Alex Blanchard Capital as manager of investor relations & communications. The agreement is for six months continuing month to month and may be terminated thereafter with one month’s notice for CAD$7,500 per month. Mr. Blanchard was granted 200,000 warrants exercisable at $0.29 and 300,000 stock options exercisable at $0.295 vesting 100,000 options at each of the 1st, 2nd and 3rd anniversaries of the contract provided that the contract is not terminated. As at August 31st, 2017 $37,878 was recognized in consulting for the grant of the warrants.

On June 22nd, 2017, pursuant to its agreement with Docherty Management Ltd. and C.A.B. Financial Services Ltd. the company issued 420,000 restricted common shares and cash compensation of $23,600.

On August 16th, 2017, the Company issued 663,525 shares of its common stock from the exercise of warrants and options previously granted for proceeds of $97,030. All warrants and options were exercised by third parties who are neither officers nor directors of the Company.

On August 16th, 2017, the Company entered into a consulting agreement with a third party issuing 500,000 warrants to buy one common share each at an exercise price of $0.44 and valid for one year. 200,000 warrants vested immediately and a value of $34,344 was recognized in consulting. 150,000 warrants vest December 15th, 2017 and 150,000 warrants vest April 15th 2018.

As at August 31, 2017, certain existing convertible debt was converted into common shares for the amount of $45,000 @ $0.15 for 300,000 common shares plus the accrued interest of $1,125 for 7,500 shares for a total issuance of 307,500 common shares.

On August 31, 2017, the Company issued 32,433 shares of its common stock in settlement of $12,000, previously recognized within accounts payable and accrued liabilities.

The Company experienced the following significant corporate developments subsequent to August 31, 2017

On September 15th, 2017, the Company issued 625,000 shares of its common stock from the exercise of warrants previously granted for proceeds of $93,750. All warrants were exercised by third parties who are neither officers nor directors of the Company.

On October 31st, 2017, the Company announced it received a Notice of Allowance from the United States Patent and Trademark Office (“USPTO”)(USPTO) granted our first patent on October 31, 2017. In 2019, the licence agreement was updated granting Lexaria an exclusive license to use DehydraTECH technology for the usea period of its technology as a delivery platform for all cannabinoids including THC; fat soluble vitamins; non steroidal anti-inflammatory pain medications (“NSAIDs”); and nicotine. The patent application number is 15/225,799, “Food and Beverage Compositions Infused With Lipophilic Active Agents and Methods of Use Thereof”.

On November 2nd, 2017, the Company announced it acquired 100% ownership interest in its majority owned subsidiary Poviva Tea, LLC. The Company previously owned a 51% interest in Poviva Tea, LLC and acquired the remaining 49% interest. Compensation was US$70,000, a waiver on certain debts, and a 5%, 20-year royalty on net profits of ViPova TeaTM tea, coffee, and hot chocolate sales. No Lexaria stock or options were issued.

8


Subsequent to August 31, 2017, the company plans to hold an annual and special meeting of stockholders at the office of our law firm, Macdonald Tuskey located in North Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, to include as part of the proceedings the approval of the plan of conversion whereby our corporate jurisdiction will be changed from the State of Nevada to the Province of British Columbia, Canada by means of a process called a “conversion” and a “continuation”. Important details for stockholders related to the conversion and the associated risks for the company and stockholders are included in the S-4 Registration Statement to be released, as of the writing of this document. There are risks associated with not proceeding with the conversion regarding the increasing complexity of compliance with the regulatory framework and the associated increasing costs, the restrictions on the promotion and sale of our stocks to US investors that limit the potential liquidity of our stock, and an increasingly complex environment that can negatively impact Lexaria even as an ancillary involved company via technology licensing to entities in the state legal cannabidiol and cannabis markets. As at the time of the writing of this documentending 25 years after the date of the meeting had not been specified.

Food Science and Technology

Lexaria is a Biotechnology and food science company focused on developing and out-licensing its proprietary technologylast patent granted to PoViva Corp. Since our first patent filing in 2014 for improved taste, rapidity, and delivery of bioactive compounds in foods and other ingestible products Lexaria is focusing its capital and management time on its pursuit of intellectual property, technology licensing opportunities, an expanding portfolioDehydraTECH, we have increased the number of patent pending applications to more than 50 and functional food and supplement formulations.

On November 11, 2014, the Company acquired 51% of PoViva Tea LLC and executed an operating agreement to develop a business of legally producing, manufacturing, importing/exporting, testing, researching and developing, a line of hemp oil with cannabidiol-infused teas, drinks and foods. Lexaria oversees all aspectsdate have been allowed/granted 27 patents worldwide as of the business including, but not limited to, production, product quality, licensing, testing, product legality, accounting, marketing, capital investment, capital raising, sales, branding, advertising and fulfillment. Pursuant to the agreement, there is a Management Committee, whereby there are two representatives from Lexaria and one of the founding members of PoViva. On October 31, 2017, Lexaria purchased all remaining ownership interest to own 100% of Poviva Tea LLC.

The Company introduced an expanding variety of hemp fortified consumer food products throughout 2015 to demonstrate Lexaria’s DehydraTECHTM technology to both consumers and potential licensees. From January 2015 to December 2015, seven (7) flavors of teas; hot chocolate; coffee, and two (2) flavors of protein energy bars were introduced – all utilizing Lexaria’s patented technology DehydraTECHTM for the more efficient delivery of bioactive molecules infused within those food products.

In the production of the products, for each raw material to be used in ViPova™ -branded products, the Company assesses if the product inputs and the completed products comply with all applicable food and drug laws, and that the inputs and the finished products meet all applicable legal and quality standards including and as it relates to hemp oil content; THC content; molds and mildews; heavy metals; and may measure additional components.

The US Federal government, through the US Department of Health and Human Services, owns US Patent #6630507, which among other things, claims that

“Cannabinoids have been found to have antioxidant properties, unrelated to NMDA receptor antagonism. This new found property makes cannabinoids useful in the treatment and prophylaxis of wide variety of oxidation associated diseases, such as ischemic, age-related, inflammatory and autoimmune diseases. The cannabinoids are found to have particular application as neuroprotectants, for example in limiting neurological damage following ischemic insults, such as stroke and trauma, or in the treatment of neurodegenerative diseases, such as Alzheimer's disease, Parkinson's disease and HIV dementia.”

For reference, cannabinoids are compounds that affect cannabinoid receptors located on many human cells. CB1 receptors are widely found within the human brain; and CB2 receptors are found with the human immune system and have been linked to anti-inflammatory and other responses.

Despite independent scientific findings in many locations around the world, some regulatory agencies do not officially recognize that a human endocannabinoid system exists.

9


Over one hundred different cannabinoids have been isolated from the cannabis plant, most of which do not have psychoactive properties. One that does have psychoactive properties is tetrahydrocannabinol (THC). Endocannabinoids are produced naturally in the human body while phytocannabinoids are produced in several plant species, most abundantly in the Cannabis plant.

Cannabidiol (“CBD”) is one of the major phytocannabinoid forms of cannabinoids and is not psychoactive, often contributing more than 35% of the extracts from the cannabis plant resin. Cannabidiol occurs naturally in other plant species beyond cannabis. For example, the most widely acknowledged alternative source of phytocannabinoid is in the better understood Echinacea species, in widespread use as a dietary supplement. Most phytocannabinoids are virtually insoluble in water but are soluble in lipids and alcohol. The World Anti Doping Agency (“WADA”) has exempted CBD from its 2018 list of banned substances.

The Alternative Health sector is large and growing. A long term Medical Expenditure Panel Survey was conducted from 2002 until 2008 with at least 29,370 subjects asked repeatedly if they had seen any kind of health care practitioner in the previous six months. The survey recorded whether the health care provider was a “complementary and alternative medicine care professional,” including “homeopathic, naturopathic, or herbalist.”

Between 5.3% and 5.8% of the survey group at any one time reported that they had seen a complementary or alternative medicine provider. Based on the US population of ~323,000,000, this suggests between 17.1 million and 18.7 million Americans are seeking an alternative health care professional at any given time.

Meanwhile the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, in an April 2011 NCHS Data Brief, reported that more than 50% of the population uses dietary supplements of one kind or another. Detailed findings from that report included:

Status of operation; Consumer product development and sales

More than 150 million Americans drink tea every day, amounting to some 79 billion servings of tea in America every year. Our launch of ViPova™ Tea brand is meant to tap into this existing demand. Part of our corporate strategy is to build national brands through products that large groups of potential customers are already familiar and comfortable with.

PoViva Tea LLC has filed patents pending to bind active hemp oil ingredients with a lipid, potentially allowing for more efficient and comforting delivery of the CBD.

Lexaria began producing cash flows from its products in January 2015; focused on the immediate opportunities in the hemp-oil-sectors that are federally legal. Cannabinoids have been found by many researchers to have antioxidant properties and Lexaria plans to use the DehydraTECHTM patented process to infuse hemp oils into a number of popular food and beverages.

Lexaria has launched a line of premium products, always relying on our DehydraTECHTM patented infusion process, to bring hemp oil into the mainstream. Because hemp oil does not have psychoactive properties we expect our products to appeal to the widest possible customer base. To date we have focused our sales efforts across the continental USA. Some studies have found that 3% of the Canadian population regularly consumes hemp food products, while 1% of the American population regularly consumes hemp food products. We believe the consumption of hemp based food products offers exceptional growth possibilities.

According to Nutrition Business Journal, the Organic Food sector was a $246 billion industry in the USA during 2014, while Dietary Supplements was a $34.6 billion industry. According to Arcview, state-legal Cannabis was a $4.7 billion US industry in 2015 and expected to grow to over a $20 billion sector before 2025 but is clearly a much smaller industry sector than the more established food sectors. Lexaria has not yet determined whether our hemp oil-infused products will be accepted into any or all three of these particular sectors.

10


Lexaria has a main corporate website as well as smaller e-commerce focused websites devoted to consumer products. The majority of product sales have taken place through the e-commerce websites. A contracted national distribution center ensures rapid and accurate fulfillment of all orders. A 1-800 ordering center has also been placed into operation.

Lexaria had previously launched the “Lexaria Energy” brand that is 100% owned by the Company. Under this brand, the Company plans to develop hemp oil-infused food products for people with active lifestyles, such as protein bars, protein shakes and other similar products. On November 3, 2015, Lexaria Energy10 protein bars became available for retail sales with two flavors. The original contract manufacturer of these protein bars was unable to fulfill additional orders and we have not currently been able to locate and contract an alternative location to manufacture this more complicated food product, with the result that the product is temporarily discontinued while we search for a suitable manufacturing location.

Through the November 2014 acquisition of 51% of Poviva Teas LLC, and October 2017 100% acquisition, Lexaria acquired control of certain patents pending, allowances and grants with the United States Patent Office. Lexaria has worked to broaden the patents and extend their utility to molecules other than those originally named.

On June 11, 2015, Lexaria initiated the simultaneous filing of a U.S. utility patent application and an International patent application under the Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT) procedure, both at the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (“USPTO”). These applications follow the Company’s 2014 and 2015 family of provisional patent application filings in the U.S. and serve two additional broad purposes:

1.

Lexaria is seeking protection of its intellectual property under international treaties. To this end Lexaria has filed for PCT patent application protection. There are 148 countries that are signatories to the Patent Cooperation Treaty, including such major markets as Canada, China, India, much of Europe and the Middle East, the United Kingdom and Japan among others.

2.

Lexaria believes its lipid infusion technology has applications beyond the delivery of just cannabinoids. Based on further formulation testing, Lexaria has included additional lipophilic molecules that may be delivered via food and beverage formats utilizing its technology, widely encompassing three major new market opportunities for the Company: Nicotine; Nonsteroidal Anti-Inflammatories (NSAIDs); and Vitamins.

In December 2015, the Company filed two further provisional patent applications in the U.S. These new applications served to further broaden the variety and applicability of base compounds that can be used when formulating the Company’s lipid based technology. The first of these applications identify compounds like edible starches (e.g., tapioca starch) that are commonly used in food products today and could, therefore, serve as a base for formulating and incorporating the Company’s Technology into a wide variety of every day food products. The second of these applications identify emulsifier compounds like gum Arabic that are commonly used in beverage products today in order to facilitate similar flexibility for formulating the Company’s Technology in every day, shelf-stable beverages.

On October 26, 2016, the USPTO issued U.S Patent No. 9474725, Cannabinoid Infused Food and Beverage Compositions and Methods of Use Thereof, pertaining to our method of improving bioavailability and taste of certain cannabinoid lipophilic active agents in food products. This is the Company’s first patent granted and has a publish date of October 27, 2016 (June 10 2017 in Australia No. 2015274698) and protects our technology for twenty years.

The Company does not know and cannot know whether these strategies will be successful, or if successful, how long it will take to gain consumer acceptance and customer loyalty. It can be a challenge to be successful by introducing new consumer products to a competitive retail marketplace, and we can offer no assurances that our products will be a commercial success.

11


International patent protection

When Lexaria first began examining the legal medical cannabis market in 2013, the Company believed it could make an impact in perhaps both the Canadian and U.S. marketplaces.this filing. Our pursuit and development of our technology has expanded our potential area of impact, both geographically and by sector. Because of the applicability of our technologyDehydraTECH to markets outside ofmany market sectors across the legal cannabis sector,globe, we have taken the necessary steps to protect that intellectual property internationally.

Lexaria has patents granted or patent applications progressing in countries around the world with aggregate populations of nearly 4 billion people. We pursue international patent protection through filings under the Patent Cooperation Treaty, followed by national filings. Our global patent portfolio now stands at 27 and we have more than 50 patent applications filed in over 40 jurisdictions which are considered as having the highest commercial potential. The patents and patent applications apply to fat-soluble versions of vitamins, NSAIDs, nicotine, cannabinoids, hormones, PDE5 inhibitors, antivirals, and other molecules. Several of our patent families include intellectual property addressing the manufacturing and processing methods used to combine long-chain fatty acids with active pharmaceutical ingredients.

4

Table of Contents

In addition, while ten of our US patents and nine of our Australian patents have been granted to date, we now have received granted patents in the European Union, Japan, India and Mexico, and have multiple other applications filed in the US and around the world. It is not possible to forecast with certainty when, or if, our remaining patents pending will become granted patents. We will continue to pursue our remaining patents pending as vigorously as we are able, since the successful granting of more of those applications could lead to material increases in shareholder value. If our remaining patent applications do become granted patents, our ability to generate meaningful license revenue from our intellectual property may increase from multiple jurisdictions outside of the US.

Our current patent portfolio includes patent family applications or grants pertaining to Lexaria’s method of improving bioavailability and taste, and the use of DehydraTECH as a delivery platform for a wide variety of Active Pharmaceutical Ingredients (“APIs”) encompassing all cannabinoids; fat soluble vitamins; NSAIDs pain medications; and nicotine and its analogs. The Company currently has more than 50 patent applications pending worldwide and due to the complexity of pursuing patent protection, the quantity of patent applications will vary continuously as each application advances or stalls. We continue to investigate national and international opportunities to investigate expansions and additions to our intellectual property portfolio. Patents have been filed specifically for the use of DehydraTECH with cannabinoids for the treatment of heart disease.

Lexaria is also filing new patent applications for new discoveries that arise from the Company’s R&D programs. We will continue to seek beneficial acquisitions of intellectual property if and when we believe it is advisable to do so. Due to the inherent unpredictability of scientific discovery, it is not possible to predict if or how often such new applications might be filed or patents issued.

The substance of the patents centre on the use of DehydraTECH in a variety of products including those that are ingested or topically administered such as CBD, food, beverage, patches, creams, lotions et cetera. Patents have been filed (and granted in both Australia and the EU) specifically for the use of DehydraTECH with cannabinoids for the treatment of heart disease. The pending and granted patents also cover the manufacturing and processing methods used to combine fatty acids with active pharmaceutical ingredients. This includes heating and drying methods and use of excipients and substrates. Below we summarize Lexaria’s allowed/granted patents.

Issued Patent #

Patent Family

US 9,474,725 B1

#1 Food and Beverage Compositions Infused With Lipophilic Active Agents and Methods of Use Thereof

US 9,839,612 B2

US 9,972,680 B2

US 9,974,739 B2

US 10,084,044 B2

US 10,103,225 B2

US 10,381,440

US 10,374,036

US 10,756,180

AU 2015274698

AU 2017203054

AU 2018202562

AU 2018202583

AU 2018202584

AU 2018220067

EP 3164141

JP 6920197

AU 2016367036

#2 Methods for Formulating Orally Ingestible Compositions Comprising Lipophilic Active Agents

JP 6963507

MX 388 203 B

AU 2016367037

#3 Stable Ready-to-Drink Beverage Compositions Comprising Lipophilic Active Agents

IN 365864

JP 6917310

MX 390001

JP 7112510

#7 Lipophilic Active Agent Infused Compositions with Reduced Food Effect

AU 2019256805

#8 Compositions Infused with Nicotine Compounds and Methods of Use Thereof

US 11,311,559

#18 Compositions and Methods for Enhanced Delivery of Antiviral Agents

5

Table of Contents

Patents granted in the year ended August 31, 2022

In fiscal 2022, the Company’s patent portfolio expanded to include three new patent families. This further protects our exclusivity in the use of DehydraTECH with nicotine and antiviral agents, in compositions that have a reduced food effect and for delivery of lipophilic active agents via transdermal or dermal delivery. These patents are as follows:

·

our first ever patent granted in our 8th patent family, to use DehydraTECH to more efficiently deliver nicotine through buccal tissue absorption. The new Australian patent entitled “Compositions Infused with Nicotine Compounds and Methods of Use Thereof” expands upon Lexaria’s international intellectual property rights to apply DehydraTECH enhancement technology to most oral forms of nicotine, including pills, tablets, lozenges, capsules, pouches, gums and sprays. The patent covers many different forms of nicotine including free base nicotine, nicotine salts, polymer resins of nicotine and other forms of nicotine complexes.

·

our first-ever patent granted in our 18th patent family, to use DehydraTECH in the enhanced delivery of antiviral drugs, in the United States. The new US patent entitled “Compositions and Methods For Enhanced Delivery Of Antiviral Agents” expands upon Lexaria’s international intellectual property rights to apply DehydraTECH enhancement technology with antiviral drugs where our research has shown that antiviral drugs processed with DehydraTECH were able to reach peak blood concentration levels that were double those of non-DehydraTECH-processed; and overall volumes of drug delivered into bloodstream were up to triple the amount compared to non-DehydraTECH-processed drugs.

·

our first ever patent granted in our 7th patent family which recognizes DehydraTECH’s ability to deliver API’s more efficiently regardless of the presence of foods within the gastrointestinal system, in Japan. The new Japan patent entitled “Lipophilic Active Agent Infused Compositions With Reduced Food Effect” recognizes the important achievement in reliable drug dosing resulting from DehydraTECH’s ability to deliver drugs more consistently into the bloodstream regardless of the presence of food in the gastrointestinal system.

·

our first Mexican patent in our third patent family, “Stable Ready-to-Drink Beverage Compositions Comprising Lipophilic Active Agents” from which patents have already been issued in Australia, India, and Japan. The patent is applicable to a range of active ingredients that includes but is not limited to non-psychoactive cannabinoids and NSAIDs. Types of products covered include certain pharmaceutical product formats as well as a wide variety of ready-to-drink consumer retail beverage products. Additional claims granted include the treatment of neurological diseases such as Alzheimer’s disease, Parkinson’s disease, schizophrenia, and Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV): dementia; obesity; metabolic disorders such as insulin related deficiencies and lipid profiles, hepatic diseases, diabetes, and appetite disorders; cancer chemotherapy; benign prostatic hypertrophy; irritable bowel syndrome; biliary diseases; ovarian disorders; marijuana abuse; and alcohol, opioid, nicotine or cocaine addiction.

Research and Development

Lexaria incurred $1,842,675 (2021- $1,262,895) in R&D expenditures during fiscal 2022. Specific programs are in ongoing development and are prioritized relative to our financial and operational ability to undertake each research phase for specific APIs. Due to our expanding portfolio coverage, we continue to explore accelerated timetable options for testing, research and further development.

The Company regularly pursues new R&D programs that investigate potential commercial applications for the incorporation of DehydraTECH. These include, but are not limited to, ongoing programs to explore methods to integrate nano emulsification chemistry techniques together with DehydraTECH that have demonstrated positive results to date, programs to further enhance intestinal bio absorption rates with DehydraTECH, as well as ongoing programs to expand the types and breadth of product form factors into which DehydraTECH can be applied. Depending on the number of programs undertaken, R&D budgets are expected to vary significantly. It is in our best interests to remain flexible at this early stage of our R&D efforts in order to capitalize on potential novel findings from early-stage tests and thus redirect research into specific avenues that offer the most reward.

Lexaria has conducted a number of pharmacokinetic studies designed to provide potential early-stage indications of enhancing delivery characteristics of various drugs for potential future use. Our first human clinical study was published in 2019 (Advances in Therapy titled “Examination of a New Delivery Approach for Oral Cannabidiol in Healthy Subjects: A Randomized, Double-Blinded, Placebo-Controlled Pharmacokinetics Study”-see PubMed.gov website: PMID: 31512143), where we demonstrated that DehydraTECH delivered higher volumes of CBD into the human circulatory system and did so more quickly than a concentration-matched positive control. The study demonstrated a statistically significant reduction in human blood pressure (“BP”) from the DehydraTECH processed CBD, versus no statistical reduction in human blood pressure from the positive control. The results of this study significantly influenced the direction of Lexaria’s research and development of its DehydraTECH technology.

6

Table of Contents

During fiscal 2022 Lexaria marked significant milestones in utilizing DehydraTECH-processed cannabidiol (“CBD”) for investigation of heart disease and hypertension; and separately, for oral nicotine delivery as a non-combusted, reduced-risk alternative to smoking. The following studies are the most recent contributors to our applied R&D programs. These studies have been entirely funded through the Company’s existing cash resources.

HYPER-H21-1

During the spring of 2021 Lexaria commenced its human clinical study HYPER-H21-1 with the intent to validate DehydraTECH-CBD’s effect on hypertension. This was a randomized, double-blind, controlled study with 24 subjects aged 45-65 and enrolled with symptoms of either pre-hypertension or mild hypertension. A single 300 mg dose of a DehydraTECH 2.0 CBD formulation was compared against a non-DehydraTECH control of matched concentration. Time series blood pressure and heart rate analyses were the primary objectives of the study. Secondary objectives included pharmacokinetic speed and rate of absorption of CBD and its main metabolites together with assessment of inflammatory markers of cardiovascular disease and nitric oxide biomarkers. The Company noted that the DehydraTECH-CBD treatment was well tolerated by the volunteers with no serious adverse events or side effects observed or reported. Early results disclosed in July 2021 noted a difference between the DehydraTECH-CBD formulation and the control arm at the 20-minute mark that was statistically significant (p=0.025).

HYPER-A21-1

Animal study HYPER-A21-1, an animal study utilized three new “DehydraTECH 2.0” formulation variations designed to enable CBD delivery performance enhancements and pharmacokinetic optimization. All three new formulations delivered improved performance when compared to both Lexaria’s original DehydraTECH 1.0 and 2.0 concentration-matched formulations, as well as to a medium chain triglyceride (“MCT”) oil based control formulation representative of standard industry practices. The study demonstrated that each of the new DehydraTECH 2.0 formulations delivered very high levels of CBD absorption into brain tissues, dwarfing the levels achieved with the MCT oil-based control formulation. The three new DehydraTECH 2.0 formulations delivered between 907%-1,737% more CBD into brain tissue than the MCT oil-based control formulation, similar to the up to 1,937% increase over the MCT oil based control formulation announced previously for Lexaria’s original DehydraTECH 2.0 formulation.

HYPER-H21-2

Dosing was completed in July of 2021 in our second human clinical study in 2021which was conducted at a European medical research hospital and designated as HYPER-H21-2. On September 7, 2021, Lexaria announced the results which evaluated 16 volunteers (8 male; 8 female) aged 45-65 who were pre or mildly hypertensive and received three separate doses of 150mg DehydraTECH 2.0 CBD versus placebo. The study concentrated on monitoring blood pressure reduction continuously over 24 hours and studying central arterial stiffness, physical activity, and sleep quality.

At selected times during the 24-hour study, volunteers with mild to moderate hypertension averaged as much as a 20 mmHg (i.e., 23%) decrease in BP relative to placebo. Over the 24-hour ambulatory monitoring period, volunteers averaged a significant reduction of 7.0% (p < 0.001) in systolic pressure with DehydraTECH-CBD relative to placebo. The study indicated that, within larger global markets, regardlessa 24 hour period, DehydraTECH 2.0 CBD provided a significant reduction of 3.5% in diastolic pressure relative to an increase in diastolic pressure from baseline. This is a substantial discovery as existing drugs for hypertension typically take several weeks before comparable blood pressure reductions are seen.

Further results from the study were announced on December 8, 2021, whereby DehydraTECH 2.0 CBD was also found to reduce arterial stiffness after only one day of dosing which could have the potential as a treatment for cardiovascular and other disease. This potentially broadens its application to treatment of cardiovascular and other disease states beyond hypertension where it has already shown promise.

HYPER-H21-3

Final results from HYPER-H21-3 illustrated DehydraTECH CBD’s ability to reduce blood pressure pursuant to a simulated pulmonary hypertension scenario. The study was successfully completed with positive safety and efficacy findings. Findings indicated a tendency (p=0.1) during 15 minutes of simulated low levels of oxygen (hypoxia) for reduced pulmonary artery systolic pressure (“PASP”) with DehydraTECH-CBD treatment versus placebo. Most notably, PASP was significantly attenuated by about 5 mmHg or 41% overall (p=0.045) in male participants specifically suggesting differences by sex in responsiveness to CBD treatment under hypoxic stress conditions.

Study HYPER-H21-3 used a placebo-controlled and double-blinded design, with administration of a single 300mg dose of a specific DehydraTECH-2.0 CBD formulation compared to placebo in a target group of sixteen enrolled volunteers (8 females and 8 males; aged 18-35 years). The study participants were subjected to a 30-minute period of rest following dosing, during which time they breathed normal room air (i.e., 21% oxygen), followed by a 40-minute period of simulated hypoxia (i.e., 12% oxygen) that was induced in order to safely simulate robust hypoxic pulmonary vasoconstriction (“HPV”) and, as a result, an acute state of pulmonary hypertension. The hypoxia state was intended to mimic conditions experienced by those traveling or walking at high altitude or by those engaging in other activities of diminished oxygen availability conducive to development of HPV. Adverse elevations in HPV also commonly occur in related hypoxemic pathologies (e.g., severe lung disease) and pulmonary hypertension. Measurements of PASP were performed via echocardiography at intervals of 15 and 30 minutes during the 40-minute hypoxic period comparing the effects of DehydraTECH-CBD to placebo.

7

Table of Contents

HYPER-H21-4

HYPER-H21-4 is the most ambitious study Lexaria has ever undertaken and is enabled from the successful outcomes from our other 2021 human hypertension studies. This study was intended to “de-risk” outcomes prior to Lexaria’s planned entry into formal investigational new drug (“IND”) regulatory pathways for the use of DehydraTECH-CBD to treat hypertension and possibly other forms of cardiovascular disease. The study protocols were approved by the Independent Review Board in December 2021 with the program commencing in April 2022 and dosing completion in July 2022. The primary efficacy outcome from the study was the data related to 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure. Secondary study outcomes included: vascular health including arterial stiffness and autonomic balance; electrocardiogram analysis; brain structure and function through magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) testing; blood biomarkers (including renal, hepatic inflammation, lipids such as cholesterol); sleep quality / daytime sleepiness / sleep disorders; actigraphy, geriatric depression scale, perceived stress, and Beck anxiety inventory.

The study consisted of 66 volunteers between the ages of 40-70 and used a double blinded, randomized cross-over design, which utilized a placebo control. Some volunteers were recruited who were using hypertension drugs such as ACE inhibitors, with or without diuretics, to help evaluate the efficacy of DehydraTECH CBD with and without other hypertension treatments..

Large quantities of data have been gathered since the inception of the study with data analyses beginning in September 2022 as results became available from ongoing bioanalyses of biological samples collected during the study. Each of these sets of data may lead to additional applications for DehydraTECH-CBD. For example, the MRI data may assist one of the secondary outcome measurements in the study to evaluate possible positive effects upon brain structure and function; and the detailed psychometric testing may reveal new insights into the potential benefits for mental health. The wide range of data collection could provide additional insights into the long-term health benefits of DehydraTECH-CBD that might otherwise remain undetected.

In December of 2021 the Independent Review Board approval was received and the program began in April 2022 with dosing with DehydraTECH-CBD completed in July 2022. In October 2022 Lexaria announced initial findings from HYPER-H21-4 evidencing a sustained drop in blood pressure (BP) in normally active hypertensive patients following multiple weeks of oral CBD therapy, using Lexaria’s patented DehydraTECH-CBD capsule formulation. The primary safety and efficacy objectives of study were successfully achieved. BP was significantly reduced by 2.5 weeks and was sustained over the full 5-weeks of dosing using relatively low doses of CBD (as compared to other regulator approved pharmaceutical CBD applications) as a direct result of the well-established drug delivery efficiencies of Lexaria’s DehydraTECH technology. These reductions in BP were achieved with zero serious adverse events being reported. Also, there were no adverse changes observed in liver enzymes which is an important clinical safety biomarker of oral CBD therapy. Of note, these significant decreases in BP were achieved using relatively low doses of DehydraTECH-CBD as a direct result of the well-established drug delivery efficiencies of Lexaria’s DehydraTECH technology.

There were no serious adverse events to reported as a result of the program dosing. This demonstrates a noteworthy safety and tolerability profile relative to conventional anti-hypertensive medications. This is a major achievement for Lexaria as avoiding serious adverse events at clinically efficacious doses will be a primary requirement to achieve eventual regulatory marketing authorizations.

Another important discovery from study HYPER-H21-4 was that the decreases in BP were similar in persons currently being treated with standard of care BP medications as in persons who were not undergoing any current standard of care BP treatment. This observation is suggestive that Lexaria’s DehydraTECH-CBD has the potential to offer additive BP reduction benefits on top of any degree of improvements the standard of care medications achieved for those patients before entry into the study. This additive improvement as an adjunct therapy, together with the exceptional safety profile of DehydraTECH-CBD, could become a significant value enhancer should it eventually enter the marketplace as an approved hypertension treatment. As expected, the study produced an enormous amount of data that is initially supportive of Lexaria’s plans to enter regulatory pathways under IND with a view to eventual regulatory approval to use DehydraTECH-CBD to treat hypertension if successful. Additional study endpoint analyses as described in the complete study protocol are ongoing and any relevant material findings will be reported upon in due course as these findings become available.

Cannabidiol: EPIL-A21-1

In March 2022, Lexaria commenced an initial animal study to determine if DehydraTECH-CBD evidences superior treatment of seizure activity when compared to Epidiolex. Epidiolex is an FDA-approved oral solution prescription CBD available to children 1 year of age and older to treat seizures associated with Lennox-Gastaut syndrome, Dravet syndrome or tuberous sclerosis complex. In September 2019, Epidiolex was approved for use in all 27 member countries of the European Union. Epidiolex was developed by GW Pharmaceuticals plc and is now sold by Jazz Pharmaceuticals subsequent to their 2021 takeover of GW Pharmaceuticals. Epidiolex’s effectiveness was studied in three randomized clinical trials involving a total of 516 patients and was shown to be effective in reducing the frequency of seizures when compared to placebo.

8

Table of Contents

Lexaria’s animal study is being conducted by a leading US-based independent laboratory using advanced DehydraTECH 2.0 formulations and is fully funded through existing Lexaria resources. Lexaria hopes to demonstrate similar or superior levels of efficacy based on the known advanced drug delivery capabilities of DehydraTECH. Lexaria’s seizure program expects to leverage the significant gains in systemic delivery and brain uptake that the Company has evidenced from other studies comparing DehydraTECH 2.0 CBD formulations with concentration-matched controls.

THC-A21-1

In the first quarter of 2022, Lexaria announced the results from its tetrahydrocannabinol (“THC”) animal study which compared DehydraTECH-enhanced THC with concentration matched controls. We discovered that DehydraTECH-enhanced THC delivery into the blood plasma occurred within 15 minutes of oral ingestion as compared to parallel levels of THC delivery into blood plasma occurring at 45 minutes for the concentration matched controls. Furthermore, DehydraTECH-THC delivered more THC into the bloodstream than the industry standard medium chain triglyceride (“MCT” or “coconut oil”) based control formulation from the 2-minute mark onwards, then dropped to the same level as the MCT control by the 6-hour mark.

Estradiol: HOR-A22-1

Lexaria began a tolerability and PK pilot study in animals using a DehydraTECH-estrogen composition in an effort to determine if absorption enhancement following oral administration was possible. After commencing this study work, our third-party laboratory performing the study concluded that the bioanalytical methodology employed required modification in order to adequately detect and quantify estrogen analytes in the animal bloodstream. Methodological optimization is in progress, following which blood plasma samples will be analysed and results reported.

Ibuprofen and Naproxen: NSAID-A21-1

The Company commenced a tolerability pilot study in animals evaluating DehydraTECH-processed formulations of ibuprofen and naproxen in an effort to determine if dosing evidenced superior gastrointestinal tolerability comparing Lexaria’s DehydraTECH test articles to concentration-matched controls. The study was undertaken based on the possibility that DehydraTECH-processed NSAIDs might achieve higher bioavailability and brain uptake than conventional formulations and, in turn, be able to be used at lower dosage levels in order to lower unwanted side effects. Our results saw some indications of less stomach ulcerations with our DehydraTECH formulations although the findings were generally unremarkable. As a result, no further research on NSAIDs is currently contemplated although this may be revisited.

Sildenafil: PDE5-A21-1

PDE5-A21-1 was an animal PK study conducted by third-party laboratories to evaluate DehydraTECH processing of the phosphodiesterase inhibitor (“PDE5 inhibitor”) sildenafil for potential application in the management of erectile dysfunction. PDE5 inhibitor drugs work using a process of vasodilation and most are considered to be slow-acting, requiring 1-2 hours to reach peak levels in the bloodstream for maximum effectiveness.

Lexaria announced the results of our comparison study in February 2022 of DehydraTECH enhanced sildenafil with concentration matched controls. It was discovered that DehydraTECH-enhanced sildenafil delivered 74% more sildenafil into the bloodstream in as little as four minutes when compared to the concentration-matched, generic control formulation. This clear trend toward faster and higher overall delivery of sildenafil into the bloodstream was evidenced over the course of the study. Seven minutes after dosing, the DehydraTECH-sildenafil formulation achieved an average blood level higher than the generic sildenafil control formulation reached at any point during the study.

Viral-A20-3

In July of 2021, we released the positive results of our completed tolerability and pharmacokinetic animal study VIRAL-A20-3 which enhanced colchicine with DehydraTECH. This study was performed by an independent, premier animal testing laboratory located in the United States using 20 Sprague-Dawley rats, dosed via oral gavage using either DehydraTECH or control colchicine formulations (i.e. 10 rats per test article). The study evaluated peak concentration (“Maximum Concentration” or “Cmax”) and total drug delivery into the rodent bloodstream (“Area Under the Curve” or “AUClast”).

9

Table of Contents

Similar to other antiviral agents that Lexaria has processed with DehydraTECH (e.g., darunavir, efavirenz, remdesivir’s nucleoside analogue GS-441524 and ebastine), oral colchicine in its available forms today exhibits diminished bioavailability (approximately 45%) in humans. This study demonstrated that DehydraTECH enabled colchicine, benefited from our proprietary formulation and processing, resulting in increased delivery.

Colchicine is an approved therapeutic with anti-inflammatory effects that is principally used to treat gout and conditions such as cardiac inflammation (i.e., pericarditis), and also has potent effects in mitigating the cytokine storm associated with SARS-CoV-2/COVID-19. Colchicine is occasionally recommended and used to treat emergent pericarditis in children in cases where this form of cardiac inflammation develops following administration of mRNA COVID-19 vaccines. Due to its narrow therapeutic index, meaning the distinction between toxic and non-toxic doses is marginal, there could be significant benefits in dosage reduction through the use of DehydraTECH, while maintaining therapeutic delivery levels.

Diabetes: DIAB-A22-1

DIAB-A22-1, is a 56-day animal program undertaken by a third-party testing laboratory located in Canada to explore the ability of DehydraTECH-CBD to potentially affect treatment of diabetes. The laboratory work is expected to complete in the second quarter of calendar 2023 with data and reporting to follow thereafter. Lexaria is exploring the use of DehydraTECH-CBD for the treatment of diabetes due to its evidenced the safety and efficacy of DehydraTECH-CBD in human hypertension studies and the strong connections between heart disease, hypertension, and diabetes. Diabetes is a disease whereby the body does not produce sufficient insulin, leading to higher-than-normal levels of sugars in the blood. Risks of kidney disease, vision loss, heart and cardiovascular disease and more are greatly enhanced by sufferers of diabetes. Because diabetes is often closely connected to obesity, it is a chronic and growing problem around much of the world.

Dementia: DEM-A22-1

Lexaria has evidenced the efficacy of DehydraTECH-CBD in human hypertension studies with no serious side effects. The connections between hypertension and dementia have been established in recent clinical studies. Individuals who have high blood pressure are more likely to develop vascular dementia, which is the second most common form of dementia following Alzheimer’s disease. Dementia is a term describing the loss over time of cognitive abilities related to memory, language, problem solving abilities and behaviour. Certain trials are underway to investigate the use of nicotine for possible utility related to dementia, where some clinical success has already been reported. Others have conducted research evidencing therapeutic potential of cannabinoids including CBD in a variety of neurodegenerative diseases. Alzheimer’s is the most common form of dementia and accounts for at least 60% of all cases, and nicotine is showing promising results related to its treatment. According to the World Health Organization, 55 million people are currently suffering from dementia with roughly 10 million additional people being diagnosed each year, with 78 million expected to be living with some form of dementia by 2030. Drugs used to treat dementia represented a $15.5 billion market in 2021, expected to double to a $32.3 billion annual market by 2030, in part due to the generally aging populations.

Lexaria has previously demonstrated in animal studies that DehydraTECH-CBD crosses the blood brain barrier (“BBB”) much more effectively than originally thought possible. Given the propensity of DehydraTECH-CBD to cross the BBB; the established fact that DehydraTECH-CBD lowers human blood pressure; and the fact that CBD is known to act with vasodilation properties, we intend to investigate whether they lie withinDehydraTECH-CBD might have some positive effect on dementia. This efficacy animal study, DEM-A22-1 will evaluate if DehydraTECH-CBD may potentially have therapeutic utility against dementia. The laboratory work is expected to complete in second quarter of 2023. Depending on the medical cannabis sectoroutcomes, Lexaria is considering additional studies that might utilize either DehydraTECH-processed nicotine alone or in other unrelated sectors.combination with CBD.

Additional molecules

NICOTINE.Rheumatic Diseases: RHEUM-A22-1

Lexaria is considering an animal study to investigate the ability of DehydraTECH-CBD to potentially affect treatment of rheumatoid disease. Rheumatic diseases are autoimmune and inflammatory diseases that cause the immune system to attack joints, bones, muscles and organs. There are over 100 rheumatic diseases including Fibromyalgia, Lupus, Osteoarthritis and Rheumatoid Arthritis. The Rheumatoid Arthritis therapeutics market alone is expected to be over $30 billion per year by 2025. Lexaria has yet to commence study RHEUM-A22-1 as we are in the process of evaluating potential third-party service providers and suitable animal models to do so.

Nicotine: NIC-A21-1.

The results of our investigative work on the pharmacokinetic performance of DehydraTECH 2.0 nicotine formulations, specifically via the oral buccal/sublingual route of administration, were released in October 2021. We reported our Study NIC-A21-1 conducted in male beagle dogs, which demonstrated that DehydraTECH nicotine administered via the oral pouch product format required only 2 to 4 minutes to deliver nicotine levels in blood plasma comparable to levels achieved at 45 minutes with concentration-matched controls. DehydraTECH-nicotine also reached statistically significant peak blood plasma levels up to 10-fold higher overall than controls (p=0.004) while still clearing from blood virtually as quickly as the controls. Two nicotine formats were investigated in this study: nicotine benzoate and nicotine polacrilex. We found that the generic nicotine benzoate pouch required approximately 45 minutes to reach its peak delivery rate whereas the DehydraTECH nicotine benzoate pouch reached peak delivery rates at both 8 minutes and again at 30 minutes. It was found that 4 minutes after the pouch was placed in the mouth, the DehydraTECH-nicotine had reached a higher delivery level than the generic achieved at any point during the study. Similarly, the generic nicotine polacrilex pouch also required approximately 45 minutes to reach its very subdued peak delivery rate while the DehydraTECH nicotine polacrilex pouch achieved a comparable level in just 2 minutes. The DehydraTECH nicotine polacrilex pouch delivered over 10 times the nicotine level in blood plasma at peak than the generic version while still clearing from blood virtually as quickly as the controls.

10

Table of Contents

Nicotine: NIC-H22-1

In November of 2022 we received independent review board approval for human clinical nicotine study NIC-H22-1, a 36-person human PK randomized, double blinded, cross-over study conducted in current cigarette smokers, wherein each person will visit the laboratory to be dosed three times over a period of weeks. During each visit only one oral nicotine pouch will be administered and evaluated: either DehydraTECH-nicotine; On!™ brand manufactured by Altria; or Zyn™ brand manufactured by Swedish Match™. Predetermined questionnaires for subjective evaluation will be used for each oral nicotine pouch, and blood samples will be taken 8 times per visit to conduct objective evaluations related to quantity of nicotine in blood at various time points. Data on vital signs such as temperature, blood pressure, heart and respiratory rate will also be collected. Subjective evaluations related to throat burn, user experience, gastrointestinal experience will also be conducted. Lexaria hopes to evidence that processing purified nicotine with DehydraTECH leads to better oral-tissue absorption and reduced negative experiences compared to currently marketed brands. The study had earlier faced certain time extensions due to manufacturing and logistics, those issues since resolved. The study is fully funded from internal company resources. Lexaria will provide further updates and any relevant material findings in due course.

Business Development

Hypertension

Approximately 1.28 billion people worldwide suffer from hypertension - elevated blood pressure - and is recognized as one of the world’s top health problems. Only 21% of people with hypertension have it under control which demonstrates enormous unmet need. Among persons 50 years of age or older, isolated systolic hypertension is the most common form of hypertension, and systolic blood pressure becomes more important than diastolic blood pressure as an independent risk predictor for coronary events, stroke, heart failure, and end-stage renal disease.

Drugs focused on blood pressure and related conditions are some of the best selling drugs in the world. Lipitor™, used to treat high cholesterol and reduce the risk of heart disease, has generated $94.7 billion in revenue from 1992 until 2017. Plavix™ is used to prevent heart attack and stroke, has sold $46.5 billion from 1992 until 2017. There are several hypertension drugs that each generate $1 billion per year or more in revenue. Hypertension valued at $28 billion per year is one subset of the broader cardiovascular disease category, which is expected to be a $146 billion market in 2022.

Lexaria is determined to fill the need for a safe, effective, tolerable treatment for hypertension and have a meaningful impact on comorbidity-related costs and deaths with our DehydraTECH-CBD. In pre-clinical and exploratory studies conducted to-date, Lexaria has evaluated through in vivo, in vitro, and human clinical testing the repeatedly evidenced efficacy in utilizing DehydraTECH-CBD to reduce blood pressure while avoiding serious negative adverse effects. Efficacy and lack of negative side effects are two major objectives of FDA-registered clinical studies. With the continued favorable results from our 2021-2022 HYPER programs, we have begun the Investigational New Drug “(IND”) application process. Lexaria has retained the services of a regulatory affairs and quality assurance consultancy group that assisted us with the preparation of our pre-IND meeting with the FDA. They are now assisting us with our protocol finalization and IND filing.

On June 6, 2022, we successfully filed a pre-IND meeting request with the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (“FDA”). The FDA has responded to and confirmed Lexaria’s filing and requested a pre-IND meeting, which formally initiates communications with the FDA regarding development of Lexaria’s DehydraTECH-CBD for the treatment of hypertension. The purpose of the pre-IND meeting is to confirm the details and acceptability of Lexaria’s ongoing IND-enabling development program to be completed thereafter prior to proceeding with its full IND application filing.

On August 10, 2022, the FDA sent a positive written response from its pre-IND meeting regarding DehydraTECH-CBD for the treatment of hypertension. The FDA confirmed that it has agreed with Lexaria’s proposal to pursue a 505(b)(2) new drug application (“NDA”) regulatory pathway for our program. This is advantageous because this abbreviated pathway, as it is often described, typically enables a quicker route to commercial approval than a traditional 505(b)(1) NDA pathway. Within this communication the FDA agreed that additional non-clinical studies are not required prior to initiation of the DehydraTECH-CBD IND program, given the compelling data presented by Lexaria and others regarding the safety and tolerability of CBD. This supports Lexaria’s belief that our recent human clinical study program would support our pursuit of eventual FDA registrations.

11

Table of Contents

Lexaria’s new IND-enabling program is made possible through successfully completed studies that have provided support for more ambitious commercial goals. Recently achieved successful results from two human clinical pharmacodynamic hypertension studies and a 2018 human clinical pharmacokinetic (“PK”) study, along with a number of successful animal studies demonstrating PK performance and the molecular characterization work completed through Canada’s National Research Council, have together established a strong body of evidence for Lexaria’s DehydraTECH-CBD. These studies have shown that DehydraTECH-CBD demonstrates superior bio absorption upon oral administration and is effective at reducing blood pressure with no significant unwanted side effects.

Subject to budgetary constraints, Lexaria plans to continue with in vitro and in vivo studies testing the absorption of many API’s – CBD, vitamins, PDE5 inhibitors, antiviral drugs, nicotine, and others – to substantiate the effectiveness of DehydraTECH. More than simply satisfying scientific curiosity, successful tests are expected to lead to increased awareness and acceptance of our technology as a meaningful effective alternative to current delivery methods. Therefore, absorption tests could increasingly become an important element leading towards higher rates of acceptance of our technology licensing initiatives.

Nicotine

More than 99% of all nicotine that is consumed worldwide is delivered through smoking cigarettes. Approximately 6,000,000Worldwide, approximately 6m deaths per year worldwide, are attributed primarily to the delivery of nicotine through the act of smokingsmoking. This is according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, which also estimates that over $170 billion$170b per year is spent just in the USAU.S. on direct medical care costs for adult smokers. 69%Lexaria hopes to see the reduction of U.S. adultcommon but less healthy nicotine administration methods by way of enabling development of safe and effective oral nicotine dosage formats.

The oral nicotine pouch category is one of the fastest growing segments of the nicotine industry due in part to its reduced risk health outcomes as noted by the FDA. This delivery method, in the white pouch format specifically, involves absorption primarily through the buccal tissues of the mouth, of purified nicotine that has been separated from most other harmful compounds in the tobacco leaf. which avoids harmful lung outcomes experienced by smokers want to quit smoking and 43% of US adult smokers have attempted to quit in any twelve-month period.

Worldwide, retail cigarette sales were worth $722or vapers, The global market for the oral nicotine pouch category was US$2.33 billion in 2013,2020 and is expected to reach $21.84 billion in 2027.

DehydraTECH-Nicotine Research

Lexaria has previously completed ingestible nicotine in vivo (animal) absorption study work. In a 2018 we conducted a study designed to assess the relative ingestible nicotine absorption performance of DehydraTECH-powered formulations when compared to concentration-matched control formulations in rats. DehydraTECH formulations delivered some major nicotine absorption performance improvements: 1,160% faster delivery of equivalent peak quantities of nicotine to the bloodstream than achieved with controls (within 15 min vs. 2.9 hours), 148% gain in the quantity of peak nicotine delivery to the bloodstream relative to controls, 560% higher brain levels of nicotine where nicotine effects are focused, compared to controls, lower urine levels of nicotine excreted than controls, for enhanced nicotine activity and bioavailability over 5.7 trillion cigarettes soldthe course of the study, lower quantities of key liver metabolites in the bloodstream than controls as hypothesized, suggesting bypass of first pass liver metabolism.

The DehydraTECH formulations generally achieved faster absorption, higher peak absorption, and higher overall quantities of nicotine, on average, in the blood than the concentration-matched control formulations at both the 1mg and 10 mg/Kg doses tested. Furthermore, there were no obvious signs of gastrointestinal distress such as vomiting or diarrhea indicating that the animals appeared to tolerate the treatment well.

Nicotine blood levels were evaluated multiple times over a period of 8 hours after dosing. In the 10mg/Kg dosing arm, the control formulation required nearly 3 hours to reach similar levels of blood absorption that the DehydraTECH formulation reached in only 15 minutes. Furthermore, the DehydraTECH formulation went on thereafter to demonstrate peak plasma levels that were 148% of those achieved by the control formulation. If replicated in human studies, these findings are suggestive that DehydraTECH could prove more effective in elevating blood nicotine levels through edible formats much more quickly and substantially than 1 billion smokers.previously theorized, potentially making ingestible nicotine preparations a viable alternative to today’s available product formats while also leading to a more rapid nicotine craving satiation.

RELEVANCE: Lexaria postulates

Analysis of the liver metabolites revealed that overall levels in the blood of two of the three metabolites studied were higher in the control group than in the DehydraTECH formulation group at the 10 mg/Kg dose. The study also revealed that the DehydraTECH formulation at the 10 mg/Kg level achieved up to 5.6-times as much nicotine upon analysis of the rat brain tissue than was recovered with the matching control formulation. These findings together perhaps suggest prolongation of nicotine effectiveness with the DehydraTECH formulation which may also be beneficial in humans to control cravings over an extended time-period from a single edible nicotine dose.

12

Table of Contents

Following the above study, additional results were reported in August 2018 by way of a follow-up third-party in vivo study including two groups of 20 animals. This study further demonstrated delivery of nicotine to satisfy current demand, utilizing our patent pending lipid-delivery technology in common food groups, could shift demand from smoking cigarettes to alternative nicotine-based food products. Since mostedible form at each of the adverse health outcomes2, 4, 6, 8 and 10-minute intervals post-dosing, with 90.2% greater delivery than the concentration-matched control formulation by the 10-minute mark (95% CI; p=0.044), and significantly greater absorption levels than the control formulation at all subsequent time points in the study. Speed of nicotine consumption are associated with the delivery method and only to a lesser degree to the actual ingestion of nicotine, there could be a vast positive community health outcome through the reduction in smoking cigarettes. Additional research and regulatory compliant investigations would need to be conducted before otherwise healthy foods such as tea, coffee or energy bar snacks containing nicotine could be introduced. Nicotineonset is a named molecule inkey attribute for oral drug administration, and it is of particular importance for the latest Lexaria patent applications.

NSAID. Non-steroidal Anti-inflammatories are the second-largest categoryconsideration of pain management treatment options in the world. The global pain management market was estimated at $22 billion in 2011, with $5.4 billion of this market being served by NSAID’s. The U.S. makes up over one-half of the global market. The opioids market (such as morphine) form the largest single pain management sector but are known to be associated with serious dependence and tolerance issues.

non-inhalation nicotine delivery formats. Some of the most commonly known NSAIDs are ASA (Aspirin), Ibuprofen (Advil, Motrin),highlights of this study were: 79% improvement in peak blood levels; 94% improvement in total quantity of nicotine delivered to the blood during the 60-minute course of the study and; Lexaria’s technology delivered nicotine into the blood stream by the first time interval of blood sampling at the 2-minute mark.

Nicotine Patent

With the grant during the year ended August 31, 2022, of our Australian patent for nicotine, Lexaria believes that further potential patent awards would serve to support significant competitive advantages in the nicotine white pouch category, as well as other oral nicotine product formats such as pills, tablets, lozenges, capsules, gums and Acetaminophen (Tylenol). (Acetaminophen is not accepted by all personssprays. A similar patent filing has been made in the USA. As Lexaria demonstrates the benefits of DehydraTECH enabled oral nicotine pouches as an alternative to be an NSAID.) Although NSAIDs are generallysmoking cigarettes as a safe and effective treatmentdelivery method for pain, they have been associatednicotine, we anticipate the possibilities of engaging in licensing arrangements with a numbermajor tobacco companies. Given the rapid progress Lexaria is making towards development of gastrointestinal problems including dyspepsiaoral nicotine products, the intellectual property protection afforded by this patent and gastric bleeding.other similar patent applications, could be meaningful towards building stakeholder value.

RELEVANCE: Lexaria postulates that delivery

Nicotine Collaborations

In April of NSAIDs through a lipid-based mechanism could provide the beneficial properties of pain relief with lessened negative gastrointestinal effects, and also potentially deliver lower dosages of active ingredients with similar pain management outcomes as current pill forms at higher dosages. ASA, Piroxicam, Diclofenac, Indomethacin, Ibuprofen, and Acetaminophen are all named molecules in the latest Lexaria patent applications.

VITAMINS. The global vitamin and supplement market is worth $68 billion according to Euromonitor. The category is both broad and deep, comprised of many popular and some lesser known substances. Vitamins in general are thought to be an $8.5 billion annual market in the U.S. The U.S. is the largest single national market in the world, and China and Japan are the 2nd and 3rd largest vitamin markets.

Vitamin E is fat soluble and can be incorporated into cell membranes which can protect them from oxidative damage. Global consumption of natural source vitamin E was 10,900 metric tons in 2013 worth $611.9 million.

12


RELEVANCE: Lexaria postulates that delivery of fat soluble vitamins through its patent-pending lipid-based delivery mechanism may result in less waste and lower dosages required than most current pill forms. As well, ingestion of pills is an unpleasant experience for many people so it is possible that vitamin delivery through common food groups could vastly expand market demand for this sector. Vitamin E is a named molecule in the latest Lexaria patent applications.

On August 11, 2015, Lexaria signed a license agreement with PoViva Tea LLC for $10,000, granting Lexaria a 35-year non exclusive worldwide license to unencumbered use of PoViva Tea LLC’s IP Rights, including rights of resale. This license agreement ensures Lexaria has full access to the underlying patent pending infusion technology.

Scientific testing and validation

On August 24, 2015,2022 the Company announced potential industry-changing achievementsnew agreements with Altria Client Services, LLC (“Altria”) in enhanced gastro-intestinal absorptioneffect until March 31, 2023. Under the terms of cannabidiol (CBD) utilizing Lexaria’s patented technology. The third-party testing was conducted in two phases of in vitro tests beginning in June and completed in August, 2015.

The independent laboratory results delivered average CBD permeability of 499% of baseline permeability, compared to CBD permeability without Lexaria’s technology. These results exceed Company expectations. This was assessed inthese agreements, Lexaria will receive a strictly controlled, in vitro experiment using a human intestinal tissue model. Samples of Lexaria’s commercially available CBD-fortified ViPova™ black tea were administered in the model compared with concentration-matched CBD control preparations that lacked Lexaria’s patented formulation and process enhancements. Lexaria believes that its in vitro findings provide compelling evidence of the intestinal absorption enhancing capabilities of its technology, based on which it is exploring opportunities to progress to more advanced, follow-on bioavailability testing in animals.

The tests also showed 325% of baseline gastro-intestinal permeability of CBD comparing Lexaria’s CBD-fortified ViPova™ black tea to a second control of CBD and black tea combined, without Lexaria’s patented formulation enhancements. This confirmed that the specialized processing undertaken by Lexaria during its manufacturing process together with its formulation enhancements, does indeed significantly improve absorption levels.

The bioavailability of CBD (or of THC) varies greatly by delivery method. Smoking typically delivers cannabinoids at an average bioavailability rate of 30% (Huestis (2007) Chem. Biodivers. 4:1770–1804; McGilveray (2005) Pain Res. Manag. 10 Suppl. A:15A – 22A). By comparison, orally consumed cannabis edibles typically deliver cannabinoids at an average bioavailability rate of only 5% (Karschner et al. (2011) Clin. Chem. 57:66–75).

The Company’s present findings suggest that its DehydraTECHTM technology may achieve a 5-fold improvement in cannabinoid absorption in edible form over that which can be achieved without its proprietary process and formulation enhancements. This conceptually supports that Lexaria’s technology represents a significant breakthrough in cannabinoid delivery by approximating the high absorption levels achieved as though through administration by smoking, but without the associated negative effects on human health caused by smoking.

The tests were completed in two phases culminating with testing using simulated intestinal fluid conditions that delivered these findings. These results were stronger than earlier iterations of the tests that did not use a simulated intestinal fluid environment and contributed to Lexaria’s understanding of the mechanisms at work. For these and other reasons, Lexaria believes that bioavailability testing in animals is likely to yield even stronger absorption results in the presence of natural intestinal fluid conditions.

CBD has been repeatedly foundfee to provide beneficial pain relieving, anti-inflammatory, anti-anxiety, neuroprotection, anti-psychotic, and anti-convulsive effects among others. Lexaria’scertain DehydraTECHTM technology could significantly reduce individual serving requirements for CBD to consumers. This could lead to reduced costs of consumption for consumers and increased profitability for Lexaria.

Lexaria believes that the same technology used to enhance the absorption of CBD in laboratory tests, is applicable to THC, powder-based nicotine NSAIDs and other lipophilic compounds that are widely used today.

During January 2015, Lexaria conducted a study of nitric oxide levels in humans, as a biomarker for absorption of cannabidiol, with the expectation that it would provide additional evidence of the efficient absorption of cannabidiol from Lexaria food products enhanced with hemp oil, by demonstrating the elevation of nitric oxide in the human body in response to product ingestion.

13


The study data from human subjects demonstrated significant elevation of systemic nitric oxide levels as a surrogate biomarker for cannabidiol (CBD) bioabsorption in response to ingestion of Lexaria's products. This provided clinical support for the CBD bioavailability enhancing properties of Lexaria's patented DehydraTECHTM technology, on the premise that bioavailable CBD is known to elevate levels of the endocannabinoid anandamide in the human body which, in turn, stimulates release of nitric oxide in the vascular system.

In summary, consuming Lexaria and ViPova™ food products resulted in elevated levels of nitric oxide within the body. The results of the study indicated that all Lexaria and ViPova™ food products elicited significant increases in salivary nitric oxide, achieving levels from 110 µM to as high as 220 µM in the test subjects. The beverage products generally had faster initial responses in as little as 15 minutes after product ingestion, whereas the initial responses from the protein-energy bars required 30 minutes. The faster response time with the beverage products wasformulations to be expected, given the relative ease of digesting liquids versus solids. All products sustained their maximum levels of nitric oxide detection through to the 60-minute end-points used in the study, indicating a need for additional study to determine the length of time that nitric oxide levels remain elevated following production consumption.

The study assessed six flavors of ViPova™ tea (Yunan Black, Herbal Cherry Black, Earl Grey, Herbal Bengal Chai, Herbal Masala Chai and Decaf English Breakfast), ViPova™ Columbian Supremo Coffee, ViPova™ Hot Chocolate and Lexaria Energy Foods’ Chocolate Berry Date and Cashew Berry Date protein-energy bars.

Six healthy human subjects (3 male and 3 female) between the ages of 22 and 65 years of age were recruited for the study. Subjects were screened for cardiovascular and allergic response to hemp products, were non-smokers and did not have any history of substance or alcohol abuse. One product was studied per day across all six subjects, with each subject consuming a full product serving size. Subjects were required to refrain from eating food or using vape products for at least 12 hours before test article administration on each day of the study. Nitric oxide levels in the test subjects were assessed using a commercially available, colorimetric test kit designed to quantify systemic nitric oxide via a detectable salivary marker. Immediately before test article administration each day, all subjects were required to demonstrate a negative baseline nitric oxide saliva test. Subjects were considered to have a negative test strip reading at a level of 20 µM according to the test strip scale, and positive readings anywhere above this. Subjects performed salivary nitric oxide testing at 15, 30, 45 and 60 minutes’ post-consumption of each product. All subjects remained sedentary from baseline through to the completion of testing for each product.

Product distribution agreements

On January 28, 2016, Lexaria signed a distribution agreement with Telluride Coffee Roasters, LLC. This agreement has since ended and will not be renewed due to inactivity.

Technology out-licensing

On May 14, 2016,evaluated by Altria. In 2019, the Company entered into a Licensing Agreement allowingdefinitive agreement with Altria to fund the Licensee,R&D of DehydraTECH technology as it relates to nicotine. In exchange for a two-year period,minority equity interest (16.67%) in our subsidiary Lexaria Nicotine LLC, Altria was to utilizefund up to $12m for Lexaria Nicotine to conduct milestone-based clinical investigations utilizing DehydraTECH. Altria did not exercise its First Warrant Tranche to invest a further staged payment into Lexaria Nicotine and that warrant therefore expired on October 8, 2020 along with Altria’s former exclusive access to DehydraTECH for nicotine in the Company’sUS market.

Licencing

The Company began out-licensing our technology in the US in 2018 for the use of DehydraTECH for vitamins and food and beverages infused with cannabinoids in concentrations greater than 0.3% THC. In 2019 we granted US licences for DehydraTECH enabled CBD products and also entered into a definitive agreement in the US for licencing DehydraTECH. In December of 2020, Lexaria sold our non-pharmaceutical THC-related assets held within our wholly owned subsidiary Lexaria CanPharm ULC to create, test, manufacture, andHill Street Beverage Company Ltd. As a part of the sale agreement, the Company transferred our THC licence contracts for manufacturers that sell, marijuana-infused consumable and/or topicalintend to sell, THC infused products in the stateUS and Canada.

In January of Colorado,2021 the global rights to DehydraTECH technology to make non-pharmaceutical products that contain over 0.3% THC and other psychoactive cannabinoids was sold to Hill Street Beverages Company Inc. Lexaria has retained the rights to use DehydraTECH with an optionTHC and other cannabinoids for pharmaceutical purposes. Lexaria’s investigation of extendingenhanced delivery characteristics of THC utilizing DehydraTECH technology is now focused on medical applications. Our study findings have demonstrated rapid delivery, increased overall THC delivery, and higher brain tissue delivery; all of which is consistent with the termswants and needs of medicinal THC customers.

During the last fiscal quarter of 2022, Premier Wellness Science Co. Ltd., (“Premier”) of Japan agreed to purchase the rights to DehydraTECH technology for the Japanese non-pharmaceutical market for use with CBD and hemp ingredients in oral liquid and non-liquid products, as well as for topical, hair-care, lip-care and cosmetics products. Exclusive rights are subject to two previously issued licenses for use of DehydraTECH in Japan, which remain valid. Lexaria will not be issuing any further licenses in Japan for non-pharmaceutical cannabinoid products.

In order to retain ongoing exclusivity, the negotiated minimum quarterly payments to Lexaria begin September 1, 2022 and during the first five years of the Licensing Agreementagreement amount to Washington, Oregon, and California. a minimum of $4.5m. The license for the Japanese market is perpetual assuming that Premier submits all required payments.

In addition to the granting ofminimum payments, Lexaria will also receive royalty revenue from DehydraTECH licensed product sales under the license, the Company will provide support services to the Licensee in connection with the use of the Company’s technology during the term of the Licensing Agreement. The Licensing Agreementagreed terms. Total revenue is the first contracted, predictable, and significant revenue streamanticipated to be achieved as a direct resultsignificantly greater than the minimum payments if Premier is capable of Lexaria’s technological advantage inmeeting its forecasted revenue targets. If Premier achieves even their worst-case projected penetration into the marketplace. Under the terms of the Licensing Agreement, the Licensee will pay a minimum of $122,000 in pre-defined staged payments to Lexaria over the initial two-year term. As per the Licensing Agreement, if the Licensee were to introduce certain product lines utilizing Lexaria’s technology in each of the four states contemplated,Japanese non-pharmaceutical CBD market, then based on their projections Lexaria could expect to receive a maximumannual payments of $1,064,000 over approximately 3.5 years,$5 million by the fifth year of the contract.

13

Table of Contents

Following rigorous product development and the Licensee would enjoy semi-exclusivityformula optimization Premier is expected to introduce its productsthe “Ko” brand containing Lexaria’s DehydraTECH delivery technology in each of those states. As of August 31 20172023. The product line focuses on the company had received all of the pre-defined payments to August 31 2017 for a total receipt of $70,000 corresponding to the areas under the license agreement where the licensee has been active to-date.

14


The continuation of our business interests in these sectors is dependent upon obtaining further financing, a successful programs of development,endocannabinoid system and ultimately, achieving a profitable level of operations. The issuance of additional equity securities by us could result in a significant dilution in the equity interests of our current stockholders. Obtaining commercial loans, assuming those loans would be available, will increase our liabilities and future cash commitments.

We are not yet profitable and have not yet demonstrated our ability to generate significant revenues from our business plan. We will require additional corporate funds if our existing capital is not sufficientcircadian rhythm to support the health and wellness. It will contain CBD and other botanical extracts. Premier will create its own e-commerce infrastructure and digital marketing campaigns in collaboration with its parent company, Premier Anti-Aging Co., Ltd. Originally founded in 2009, Premier Anti-Aging Co. it is a large distributor and logistics supplier for cosmetics, OTC pharmaceuticals and nutraceuticals to wholesalers and retailers. It has shipped more than 3.5 billion products in its most recent fiscal year comprised of over 50,000 products distributed to over 50,000 retail stores.

Lexaria, on June 8, 2022, awarded AnodGen Bioceutical of Ireland a five-year, non-exclusive DehydraTECH license from its wholly-owned subsidiary, Lexaria Pharmaceutical Corp. The license is valid within Europe including the UK, Australia and New Zealand, for pharmaceutical and medical product applications incorporating DehydraTECH-infused psychoactive cannabinoid powders and medical product applications incorporating DehydraTECH-infused non-psychoactive cannabinoid powders. AnodGen will pay royalty fees to Lexaria for all cannabinoid powders sold that utilize the DehydraTECH technology. AnodGen has the right to manufacture and sell these DehydraTECH-infused powders to third party companies for their own products that are designated by a national regulator as a medical product, drug, nutraceutical, pharmaceutical or biopharmaceutical, as applicable, under its cannabinoid product license rights. Consumer products purchased without physician or medical professional consultation are not permitted under the terms of this License. AnodGen is expected to have their new facility in Ireland fully operational in 2023

On June 21, 2022, the Company until potentialentered into two agreements with BevNology LLC. The first agreement is a manufacturing operating agreement that expands production capabilities for Lexaria’s own growing list of business-to-business (“B2B”) clientele interested in purchasing DehydraTECH-powered active ingredients for consumer packaged-goods. A new processing facility custom-built by BevNology increases and broadens their production capacity and is now serving Lexaria’s B2B clients. Lexaria has installed specialized DehydraTECH manufacturing equipment into the new facility as it prepares for future profitabilitygrowth in its B2B ingredient processing business.

The second agreement is reached. Therea commercial license agreement that empowers BevNology to offer DehydraTECH products with active ingredients derived from hemp, including CBD under BevNology and partnered brands. For powdered DehydraTECH formulations this agreement is non-exclusive. For liquid DehydraTECH formulations, where BevNology has specialized skills and capabilities, the license is non-exclusive in most areas of the world but includes limited exclusivity rights in the United States only that require certain minimum fee payments in order to maintain those rights. Lexaria will receive royalties from BevNology as a result of their utilization of this license. The only countries specifically excluded under this license are no assurancesJapan, the Republic of Korea, and the People’s Republic of China.

On September 16, 2021, Lexaria Hemp entered into a 10-year license with GlobalCanna Inc. for the non-exclusive use of DehydraTECH in multiple CBD infused products in Canada. Pursuant to the terms of the agreement, GlobalCanna is required to pay minimum quarterly fees beginning in the quarter ended November 30, 2022.

Competition

The biopharmaceutical industry is characterized by intense competition and rapid innovation. We believe the key competitive factors that we will be able to obtain further funds required for our long-term operations.affect the development and commercial success of any DehydraTECH enhanced product candidates are efficacy, safety, tolerability, reliability, convenience of use, price, and reimbursement. We do not expect to require additional operating capital during our fiscal 2018 year.face competition from segments of the pharmaceutical, biotechnology and other related markets that pursue the development of API delivery platforms. We anticipate facing intense and increasing competition as new more advanced API delivery technologies become available. There can be no assurance that additional financing will be available to us when needed or, if available, that it can be obtained on commercially reasonable terms. If weour competitors are not able to obtaincurrently developing, or will not in the additional financing on a timely basis, we will be unable to conductfuture develop, technology that is equally or more effective or is more economically attractive than any of our operations as planned, and we will notcurrent or any enhanced versions of DehydraTECH.

Our competitors may be able to meetdevelop other drug delivery platforms that are able to achieve similar or better results than DehydraTECH. Our competitors include major multinational pharmaceutical companies, established biotechnology companies, specialty pharmaceutical companies, universities, and other research institutions. Many of our competitors have substantially greater financial, technical, and other longer-term obligationsresources, such as larger research and development staff and experienced marketing and manufacturing organizations and well-established sales forces. Established pharmaceutical companies may also invest heavily to accelerate discovery and development of novel therapeutics or to in-license novel therapeutics that could make DehydraTECH-enabled product candidates obsolete. Smaller or early-stage companies may also prove to be significant competitors, particularly as they become due. In such event, we could be forceddevelop novel approaches to scale downoral or perhapstopical drug delivery that DehydraTECH is focused on.

Mergers and acquisitions in the biotechnology and pharmaceutical industries result in even ceasegreater concentration of resources and capital in our operations. Therecompetitors. Our competitors, either alone or with collaborative partners, may succeed in developing, acquiring, or licensing API delivery technologies that are more effective, safer, more easily commercialized or less costly than DehydraTECH.

14

Table of Contents

Competition in alternative health sectors and consumer products in the U.S. is uncertainty as to whether we can obtain additional long-term financing if we do in fact require it.

Our business plan does not anticipate that we will hire a large number of employees or that we will require extensive office space.fierce. We expect to encounter competitive threats from existing and new participants in the sector with competing technologies. Food supplements, organic foods, and health food markets are all well established and the Company and/or its licensees will face many challenges within these markets. Although PoViva Corp. has filed patent applications to protect intellectual property, there is no assurance that patents beyond those already issued will be granted nor that other firms may not file superior patents pending. Lexaria is aware of other competing technologies that claim to also enhance the bio absorption of bioactive molecules as DehydraTECH has repeatedly demonstrated through in vitroand in vivo scientific testing. By and large, these technologies are mostly forms of nanotechnology that generally claim to enable the formation of microencapsulated microemulsions of active ingredients. These technologies can enable exceptional water solubility of ingredients and can impart improved intestinal bio absorption as a result, but do not necessarily offer the breadth of performance and value enhancing benefits that Lexaria’s DehydraTECH technology offers to its licensees.

Competition in nicotine, alternative nicotine delivery and nicotine cessation sectors in the U.S. is comprised of long-established entities, brands, and new technologies competing to create less harmful options. The sectors are complicated by the significant historical empirical data of older products or technologies versus the more limited published supporting data regarding the effects of new products or technologies. Due to the size of the sectors we expect to encounter competitive threats from existing participants and unknown new entrants. There is no assurance that other technologies already deployed, or in development, will not form the basis of product formats that competitors or consumers choose to utilize. It is also possible that historic delivery methods that have been in use and the familiarity with them may prevent adoption of products utilizing DehydraTECH in alternative delivery formats. Competing technologies or products may utilize known delivery formats or entirely new and unforecastable formats. Lexaria has demonstrated through scientific testing that DehydraTECH delivers nicotine rapidly and effectively through oral delivery. We believe that if we can educate and influence consumers to adopt a food-grade edible product format, and if US regulatory bodies authorize such format, we may be able to utilize contracted third parties for most of our production and distribution needs, instead focusing on our capital on higher value added aspects of the business such as research and development, and scientific testing. We have no current plans to build our own production facility.offer a competitively successful new product format that utilizes DehydraTECH.

Our company relies on the business experience of our existing management, on the technical abilities of consulting experts, and on the technical and operational abilities of its operating partner companies to evaluate business opportunities.

Competition

The legal marijuana industry is comprised of several sub-sectors, and is legal under different guidelines in many states though it remains illegal under most federal laws. Notwithstanding, the overall sector is generally recognized to be one of the fastest growing in the USA, with state-legal revenue of over $8 billion in 2016. Independent projections and publicized reports expect revenue of $20 billion or more in 2020, both as the sector gains in credibility and acceptance, and as more and more states legalize either medical use or adult recreational use; or both. In any fast growing industry, competition is expected to be both strong and also difficult to evaluate as to the most effective competitive threats. While we are an early adopter withinproviding technology to the cannabinoid delivery sector, there are already reportsa large number of more than 300 public companies that have claimed to be involved in the sector in some fashion;fashion, and an unknown number of private companies. Our current strategies may prove to be ineffective as the sector grows and matures, and if so, we will have to adapt quickly to changing sectoral circumstances. Accordingly, the Company intends to aggressively pursue technology out-licensing opportunities not only within the cannabinoids and nicotine sector where it iswe are already active, but also across other sectors where its DehydraTECHTM technology is patent allowed and/or pending, including the opportunities in the vitamin and supplements sector and the pain relief sectorsector.

Lexaria believes DehydraTECH offers a host of benefits beyond what competing technologies can offer, including superior oral palatability, a more appealing and all-natural ingredient compositional profile from an oral product and beverage formulation perspective, more predictable time of delivery into bloodstream and certain target tissues, and superior scalability and cost effectiveness from a manufacturing perspective. Lexaria believes that DehydraTECH is significantly distinguished from competing technologies in these respects and has a view of growing the nicotine products sector.

Competition in alternative health sectorsbreadth and in consumer productsnumber of licensees who will adopt DehydraTECH into their product offerings. Lexaria believes that these competitive advantages together with our wealth of scientific data showing noteworthy bio absorption enhancements with DehydraTECH constitute a compelling value proposition for its prospective licensees. We intend to continue to pursue license arrangements in the USA is fierce. We expect to encounter competitive threats from existing participantsmultiple bioactive ingredient sectors identified in the sectorits issued and new entrants. Although PoViva Tea LLC has filed numerouspending patent pending applications to protect intellectual property, there is no assurance that patent applications beyond those already allowed and issued will be granted nor that other firms may not file superior patents pending. Food supplements, organic foods, and health food markets are all well established and our Company will face many challenges trying to enter these markets.applications.

Compliance with Government Regulation

At least 24 States

More than thirty-nine states in the USAU.S. have passed some form of legislation related to that state’s permission to grow, cultivate, sell, or use marijuana eitherand/or CBD for medical purposes or for recreational or “adult use” purposes; or both. The various state legislationuse. Legislation is not necessarily harmonious with one another, leading to potential conflicts between state laws. Itstates and in most circumstances, it is most often not legal to transport cannabis-related products across state lines.

Lexaria does not “touch the plant”legally conducts R&D on cannabis ingredients in any location within or outside of the USA. The Company compliesour Canadian federally licensed laboratory in compliance with all federal and local Canadian laws. We abide by U.S. federal law that provides for certain exemptions for agricultural (industrial) hemp and certain byproductsby-products to be manufactured and sold in the US. TheU.S. DehydraTECHTM technology may have applications within the legal marijuana sector and Lexaria may seek is only licensed to license that technology tothose companies that have met and comply with state regulations for the sale orand distribution of cannabis related products in any particular jurisdiction.their licensed operating territories.

15


Lexaria’s position is that, just as a telephone company provides communications services, and an electric company provides electrical power, our provision of technological services to a state-legal cannabis company is in compliance with laws and required regulations.

Lexaria’s patented DehydraTECHTM technology may also have application has applications in completely separate sectors such as vitamins, non-steroidal anti-inflammatories,CBD for applications under pursuit for medical applications registered with the FDA, and nicotine. We have no products nor operationsare continuing formulation development for research and validation purposes in anyeach of these sectors today.areas. We have a formal relationship with the Altria Group and have conducted R&D with that company related to the possible development of nicotine oral products. If we do enter any of these sectors, at any time, we willmay be exposed to and of necessity willmay have to comply with all local, state, and federal regulations in each of those sectors. As a result of the possibility of Lexaria being involved in a number of disparate business sectors, compliance with government regulations could require significant resources and expertise from our company.Company.

Our Former Planned Medical Marijuana Production Operations

On June 7, 2013The U.S. Farm Bill, passed in December 2018, and the Government of Canada implemented then-new legislation, the Marijuana for Medical Purposes Regulations (MMPR), concerning the production and sale of medical marijuana. The MMPR permitted the licensing of commercial growers beginning April 1, 2014, while eliminating existing regulations permitting the production of medical marijuana on a personal-use basis. The revised regulations created conditions for a commercial industry in Canada that is responsible for medical marijuana production and distribution, by eliminating small-scale, personal-use production. Commercial growers are now able to submit applications to Health Canada for the production of medical marijuana and, if licensed, supply patients who qualify for the product at a price that would be established by market forces and at the discretion of producers. As of June 2017, 50 producers have become licensed under the latest versions of Canadian regulations.

On June 26, 2015, we entered into a share purchase agreement with Shaxon Enterprises Ltd. and Enertopia Corp. to sell our 49% interest in our Burlington, Ontario medical marijuana project application, including the MMPR application (no. 10MMPR0610) for our proposed production facility. The Burlington MMPR license application has continued in the application process under new ownership. Pursuant to the agreement, the joint venture received a non-refundable $10,000 deposit and is entitled to receive up to $1,500,000 in milestone payments upon the Burlington facility becoming licensed under the MMPR. These monies would be split 51% to Enertopia and 49% to our Company. Notwithstanding the foregoing, we can neither guarantee nor provide a meaningful time estimateambiguity regarding the grantincorporation of a production license for the Burlington facilityCBD into ingested and at this time believe it may be unlikely to be awarded.

Since June 12, 2015 the Companytopical products has had no direct involvement or ownership interest in any active or prospective operations or permit applications undersignificant impacts on the MMPR.industry segments that we operate in. This could potentially change some of the regulatory compliance risks that may affect our business. The Company has no plans at this time to applybill includes lifting restrictions on advertising, marketing, banking, and other financial services as well as allowing interstate commerce for a license in any jurisdiction for the production or sale of legal medical marijuana.

Market for Medical Marijuana in Canada

hemp and hemp-derived CBD. It is estimated by Health Canada thatalso facilitating the overall marketremoval of barriers for medical marijuana in Canada under the new MMPR will be approximately $1.3 billion per year by 2024 (source: Health Canada/Canadian Broadcasting Corporation). Health Canada projects that the number of licensed users will increase to over 450,000 by 2024. Health Canada formerly sold medical marijuana, produced on contract by Prairie Plant Systems (formerly the only licensed producer in Canada), for $5 a gram. It is estimated that the price per gram under the new licensing system will average $7.60 per gram as producers set prices without interference from government (source Health Canada/Canadian Broadcasting Corporation).

Despite these estimates the medical marijuana market is relatively new and largely unproven. The adoption rate of commercial medical marijuana by qualified patients is difficult to determine but a portion (approximately 13%) of the qualified patient population is already conditioned to purchasing government contracted producers under the old system (source: Health Canada). Furthermore, it is anticipated that the convenience of a wide selection of medical marijuana strains delivered directly to patients in a discrete and concealed package will be attractive. Healthcare practitioners are key stakeholders as they will be signing and providing the medical documentation needed for patients to register with commercial producers. Regulations under the MMPR are not significantly different for healthcare practitioners already familiar with the process under the former MMAR. Licensed producers are held responsible for quality of the product provided as the MMPR outlines strict rules for quality assessment and control, cleanliness, manufacturing, and pesticide use. Security and diversion to the black market remain a concern but MMPR outlines strict rules for segregation of duties and security clearances, background checks for employees and officers, tracking of product in and out of the premises, and camera surveillance.

16


The Use of Marijuana for Medical Purposes (source Cantech Letter: Canada’s Medical Marijuana Industry: A Top Down Look)

The marijuana or cannabis plant, aka cannabis sativa, contains more than 80 cannabinoids, a group of chemical compounds which includes delta 9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) and cannabidiol (CBD). Research has shown that THC and CBD influence different regions of the central nervous system and have different effects on cannabis users [Borgwardt, Biol Psychiatry, 2008]. Most of the psychoactive effects associated with the use of cannabis are caused by THC, whereas CBD has been shown to have anti-anxiety, anti-nausea, anti-inflammatory, and anti-psychotic effects [Bergamaschi, Curr Drug Saf., 2011; Niesink, Front Psychiatry, 2013]. Cannabis smoking often leads to adverse effects such as increases and fluctuations in heart rate and blood pressure, euphoria, anxiety, and impairment of cognition and memory. Cannabis also contains a similar array of detrimental and carcinogenic compounds compared to cigarette smoke, some of which are present even at higher concentrations [Leung, J Am Board Fam Med, 2011].

Medical marijuana is used and has been tested in a variety of indications. In the last ten years, there have been estimated 300 individually registered trials used cannabis, THC, or CBD as the intervention. Excluding addiction, the indication that accounted for the majority (42%) of trials, medical marijuana has been tested in a wide range of indications to help patients cope with pain not only from disease itself, but also for relief from strong and sometimes toxic medication, such as chemotherapy. Neurological disorders, mental health, muscle and back problems, and inflammation (such as gastrointestinal disorders) are common indications under study.

Current Status of our Previous Medical Marijuana Business

Following the announcement of the MMPR in June, 2013, our management began identifying and evaluating opportunities for entry into the medical marijuana industry in Canada. We do not currently have any direct involvement in marijuana related activities in the United States or Canada.

Enertopia Joint Venture

On May 28, 2014, our company and Enertopia Corp. entered into a definitive agreement to develop a joint business for the production, manufacture, propagation, import/export, testing, research and development of marijuana in the Province of Ontario under the MMPR.

On June 26, 2015, we signed a Definitive agreement to sell our interest in the Burlington joint venture along with the MMPR application number 10MMPR0610. The Burlington MMPR license application will continue in the application process under new ownership. Pursuant to the agreement, the joint venture received a non-refundable $10,000 deposit and is entitled to receive up to $1,500,000 in milestone payments upon the Burlington facility becoming licensed under the MMPR. These monies would be split 51% to Enertopia and 49% to Lexaria. The Enertopia and Lexaria Master Joint Venture Agreement entered into on March 5, 2014 still governs the relationship between the Company and Enertopia. Notwithstanding the foregoing, we can neither guarantee nor provide a meaningful time estimate regarding the grant of a production license for the Burlington facility. There is no assurance that any monies will in fact ever be received from our sale of the license application.

Marijuana Production in the United States

In the United States it is still illegalintellectual property protections under federal law such as patents and trademarks, as well as several other measures that may positively impact these industry segments overall. The effects the Bill may have on other regulatory bodies and their regulations will require ongoing monitoring to grow, cultivatedetermine the timing and sell medical or adult use marijuana. However more than twenty-five states have approved medical marijuana for useoutcome of any revisions.

15

Table of Contents

Employees and at least eight states have approved adult use regulations. The United States Federal government justice department has released memos that will respect the individual states where strict guidelines are followed and enforced so that the health, safety and security are protected at all times by state authorities but there is no assurance that federal laws will not at any time be more vigorously enforced. If the individual state framework fails to protect the public the Federal government will act in enforcing the controlled substances act of 1970 and the DEA will enforce the federal law.Contractors

17


As at the date of this document, our company has not entered into any prospective or definitive arrangements to produce or distribute marijuana products in the United States and has no intention of engaging in such marijuana related activities in the United States. However, our company continually reviews opportunities and monitors legal and regulatory developments related the medical marijuana sector in both Canada and the United States. We anticipate that we may re-evaluate our participation in the United States medical marijuana sector in the event that medical marijuana production becomes federally sanctioned and, in the meantime, we plan to limit our foray into the marijuana industry to ancillary involvement based on out-licensing of our DehydraTECHTM technology to state licensed producers.

On November 8 2016 referendums held in various US states increased those areas in the USA where either medical or recreational use marijuana was state-legal. More than 50% of the US population now lives in a state where either medical or recreational marijuana use is permitted by state law, although it is still banned by US federal laws.

Contractors

The Company primarily uses sub-contractorsutilize employees and consultants infor the Company’s intellectual property development and licensing and alternative health product sectors. It primarily engages with consultantsbusiness operations. Our Company relies on the business and technical experience of our existing management, on the technical abilities of consulting experts, and on the technical and operational abilities of its operating partner companies to serveidentify and evaluate business opportunities. We currently have seven full time salaried employees under contract and may add personnel to expand our internal R&D capacity. None of our employees are represented by a labor union and we consider our employee relations to be good. We outsource virtually all analytical work to independent third-party laboratories located in the USA, Canada, and Europe.

Our executive needs.personnel are entitled to incentives as set by our Compensation Committee. All executives, directors, employees and select contractors are eligible for participation in the Company’s equity incentive plan, the primary purpose of which is to attract, retain and motivate our team members by granting stock-based compensation awards.

On November 27, 2008,

Subsidiaries

Lexaria Bioscience Corp. has the Company entered into a consulting agreement with CAB Financial Services Ltd. (“CAB")following wholly owned by Christopher Bunka for $8,000 per month plus applicable taxes. Effective December 1, 2014,subsidiaries; Lexaria CanPharm ULC, Lexaria CanPharm Holding Corp., PoViva Corp., Lexaria Hemp Corp., Kelowna Management Services Corp. and Lexaria Pharmaceutical Corp., and our majority owned (83.333.%) subsidiary Lexaria Nicotine LLC. Altria Ventures Inc. owns a 16.667% equity interest along with certain other rights in Lexaria Nicotine LLC.

Available Information

Lexaria’s common stock is quoted on the Company updatedNasdaq under the consulting agreement for consulting servicessymbol “LEXX” and warrants are quoted under LEXXW. We file annual, quarterly, and current reports, proxy statements and other information with the U.S. Securities Exchange Commission (the “SEC”). These filings are available to the public on the internet at the SEC’s website at http://www.sec.gov. Lexaria Bioscience Corp. is a British Columbia based reporting issuer in Canada and as such, we are required to file certain information and documents at www.sedar.com

Our corporate website is www.lexariabioscience.com. This website address is not intended to function as a hyperlink and the information contained on our website is not intended to be a part of $10,000 a month plus applicable taxes.

On December 1 2016this Report. We make available free of charge on https://www.lexariabioscience.com/investors/regulatory-filings/ our annual, quarterly, and current reports, and amendments to those reports if any, as soon as reasonably practical after we electronically file such material with, or furnish it to, the Company entered into a new consulting agreement for consulting services of $12,000 a month plus applicable taxes with CAB, superseding the prior agreement. The term of the agreement is two years but can be terminated by either party by providing two months notice. The CompanySEC. Further details on our research programs are provided in our 2020 and 2021 Form 10-K filings. We may, pay Mr. Bunka a bonus from time to time, at its sole discretion. Mr. Bunka will be entitledprovide important disclosures to receive common stock-based and stock option based bonuses upon achieving certain milestones during the time of his consultancy with the Company. These milestones are during the first 12 months after the date of the agreement with CAB,:

Revenue Incentive Milestones (Revenue Incentives “A”)

Intellectual Property Milestones (IP Incentives “B”)

18


On December 1, 2014, the Company updated its consulting agreement for consulting services of CAD$7,500 a month plus applicable taxes (from CAD$5,500 plus applicable taxes) with BKB Management Ltd a consulting company controlled by Lexaria’s former Chief Financial Officer, Bal Bhullar. Ms. Bhullar resigned as the Company’s chief financial officer effective April 29, 2016.

On December 23, 2014, the Company entered into an Executive Management consulting agreement with Mr. Tom Ihrke for consulting services of $3,000 a month. Mr. Ihrke subsequently tendered his resignation on March 8, 2016.

On June 1st, 2017, the Company appointed Mr. Allan Spissinger as acting CFO, Corporate Secretary and Treasurer. The Company executed a twelve month consulting contract with M&E Services Ltd., a wholly owned company by Mr. Allan Spissinger, with monthly compensation of CAD$8,000 superseding the previously CAD$3,400 plus hourly billing for additional work and applicable taxes. The Company may pay Mr. Spissinger a bonus from time to time, at its sole discretion. Mr. Spissinger was awarded 200,000 incentive stock options exercisable at $0.37 vesting immediately. Mr. Spissinger will be entitled to receive additional common stock-based and stock option based bonuses upon achieving certain milestones during the time of his consultancy with the Company. These milestones are during the first 12 months after the date of the agreement with M&E Services Ltd.:

The Company appointed Mr. John Docherty as President of Lexaria effective April 15, 2015. On March 1, 2017, the Company executed a twenty four month consulting contract with Docherty Management Limited, solely owned by Mr. John Docherty with monthly compensation of CAD$15,000 plus applicable taxes, superseding the previous agreement with monthly compensation of CAD$12,500 plus applicable taxes. The Company may pay Mr. Docherty a bonus from time to time, at its sole discretion. Pursuant to the previous agreement, Mr. Docherty received 800,000 stock options and 924,000 restricted common shares of the Company. Mr. Docherty will be entitled to receive additional common stock-based and stock option based bonuses upon achieving certain milestones during the time of his consultancy with the Company. These milestones are during the first 12 months after the date of the agreement with Docherty Management Ltd.:

On June 19th, 2017, the Company executed a contract with Alex Blanchard Capital as manager for investor relations and communications. The agreement is for six months continuing month to month and may be terminated thereafter with one month’s notice for CAD$7,500 per month. Mr. Blanchard was granted 200,000 warrants exercisable at $0.29 and 300,000 stock options exercisable at $0.295 vesting 100,000 options at 1st – 3rd anniversaries of the contract provided that the contract is not terminated. Mr. Blanchard will be entitled to receive additional common stock-based and stock option based bonuses upon achieving certain milestones during the time of his consultancy with the Company. These milestones are during the first 12 months after the date of the agreement with Alex Blanchard Capital:

We do not expect any material changesposting them in the number of contractors over the next 12 month period although individual personnel changes and fluctuations should always be expected. We do and will continue to outsource contract employment as needed. However, with product advancement or retail acceptanceInvestor Relations section of our new products, we may need to retain additional contractors particularly in the fields of product manufacturing, development, sales and distribution. It is not possible to accurately project potential needs into the future based on circumstances that may or may not occur.website.

Research and Development

Lexaria incurred $54,185 (2016 $9,024) in research and development expenditures over the last fiscal year. With the successful financing efforts during fiscal 2017, the Company announced a $1 million budget to conduct research and development and additional scientific testing. Specific R&D programs are in development at this time and will be tightly related to our financial ability to undertake such steps. Due to the notice of allowance in October 2017 significantly expanding the Company’s portfolio coverage, Lexaria is examining accelerated timetable options for testing, research and development.

19


The Company’s plans includein vitro absorption testsaddress of our patented technology of molecules such as: Vitamin E, Ibuprofen,principal executive office and Nicotine.research laboratory is #100–740 McCurdy Road, Kelowna, British Columbia, Canada V1X 2P7. We also plan to conductmaintain our first everin vivo absorption tests on CBDregistered agent’s office and on nicotine, all during the upcoming fiscal year.our U.S. business office at Nevada Agency and Transfer Company, 50 West Liberty, Suite 880, Reno, Nevada 89501. Our telephone number is (755) 322-0626.

Depending on how many of these tests are undertaken, it could require budgets of as much as $1,000,000, or as little as $65,000, to do so. It is in our best interests to remain flexible at this early stage of our R&D efforts in order to capitalize on potential novel findings from early-stage tests and thus re-direct research into specific avenues that offer the most reward.

Subsidiaries

Lexaria has one wholly owned subsidiary, Lexaria CanPharm Corp., a Canadian corporation. We also have a 51%-owned subsidiary Poviva Tea, LLC which was incorporated on December 12, 2014, under the laws of the State of Nevada. As of October 2017 Poviva Tea, LLC is a 100% owned subsidiary. We also have a 50%-owned subsidiary Ambarii Trade Corporation that was incorporated on April 24, 2017 under the laws of the Province of British Columbia.

Item 1A. Risk Factors

Much

Lexaria operates in the intensely competitive biotechnology industry and is subject to numerous risks. Investment in this sector involves a high degree of risk. You should carefully consider the risks described below as well as other information in this report. The occurrence of any of the information includedevents, circumstances or developments described below could materially and adversely effect our business, financial conditions, results of operations and our future prospects. Our actual results could differ from those in this quarterly report includes or is based upon estimates, projections or other "forward looking statements". Such forward looking statements include any projections or estimates made by us and our management in connection with our business operations. While these forward-looking statements, and any assumptions upon which they are based, are made in good faith and reflect our current judgment regarding the direction of our business, actual results will almost always vary, sometimes materially, from any estimates, predictions, projections, assumptions or other future performance suggested herein.

Risks Associated with Our Business

Because cannabis is a controlled substance in some regulatory jurisdictions our Licensee’s operations may be subject to regulatory actions.

Lexaria and its subsidiaries are not involved directly or indirectly in the cultivation, processing, distribution, or utilization of Cannabis or Cannabis derived components. All of Lexaria’s consumer products utilize legally sourced Hemp and Hemp components in their production. Lexaria has an ancillary involvement exposure via out-licensing of its patented technology to licensees that may utilize the technology in the production of products that contain contents which are locally or state approved but federally controlled. Where licensee’s products contain controlled contents any revenue streams from such licensee’s may be interrupted by regulatory involvement in their business. It is possible some jurisdictions may even interpret Lexaria’s ancillary involvement as in contravention with regulations.

Lexaria has no knowledge of any non-compliance by its licensees with the regulatory framework(s) in which its licensee(s) operate.

Because there is no assurance that we will generate material revenues, we face a high risk of business failure.

There can be no assurance that our current or future products will be successful, and we cannot be sure that our overall business model within any particular sector will ever come to fruition, and if they do, will not decline over time. We may not recover all or any portion of our capital investment in product development, marketing, or other aspects of the business. Although we will exercise due consideration in our development of new products, and the marketing of them, ultimate consumer acceptance of these products is not reliably forecastable.

In addition, our product development plans may be curtailed, delayed or cancelled as a result of numerous factors including the risks described below. 

A. Risks Associated with our Business and Industry

DehydraTECH-enabled pharmaceutical products may not successfully proceed to commercialization.

The advancement of DehydraTECH-enabled products will be subject to successful completion of multi-phase testing under significant regulatory requirements and testing protocols, such as those required by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and comparable foreign regulators. A number of companies in the biopharmaceutical industry have suffered significant setbacks in advanced clinical trials due to lack of adequate capitalefficacy or adverse safety profiles, notwithstanding promising results in earlier studies. It is possible we could face similar setbacks. The effects of such reversions could cause significant delays or abandonment of testing with negative effect to our business through financial loss, industry credibility and/or a temporary or permanent decline in valuation of our Company.

16

Table of Contents

If we are unable to retain and other factors, such as weather, compliancehire qualified personnel, we may not be able to implement our business plan successfully.

In developing DehydraTECH, we rely upon our employees, consultants, contractors, and collaborators. Our current business prospects are dependent on the principal members of our executive team, the loss of whose services could make it difficult for us to manage our business successfully and to achieve our business objectives. The loss of the services of any key research, product development, regulatory and technical personnel, or our inability to hire new personnel with governmental regulations, currentthe requisite skills, could restrict our ability to carry out our R&D programs and/or develop our product candidates. Each position in a small company carries relatively greater duties and forecasted pricesresponsibilities than that position would in a larger organization. The loss of any of our key personnel could result in severe disruptions to our operations and business plans. Our ability to identify, attract, integrate, and retain additional qualified key personnel is critical to our success. Competition for input costs of foodskilled research, product development, regulatory and technical personnel is intense, and we may not be able to recruit and retain the personnel we need.

We face substantial competition, which may result in others discovering, developing and/or commercializing technology or products similar to ours before or more successfully than us.

Our commercial and/or licensing opportunities may be reduced or potentially eliminated if our competitors develop and changescommercialize products utilizing a similar technology that compete directly with those incorporating DehydraTECH. Significant delays in the estimatesdevelopment of costsour product candidates could allow competitors to completebring products to market before us which may impair the projects. We will continueability to gather information aboutcommercialize our plannedproduct candidates. This could result in reduced sales and negative pricing pressure on our technology lessening our ability to increase or even sustain revenues and causing deterioration of market prospects.

Our competitors could also develop drugs that are more effective, more widely used and less expensive than our technology supports. They may also be more successful in manufacturing and marketing their products. Competitors could acquire regulatory approval of their products and it is possible that additional information may causebefore we are able to obtain patent protection or other intellectual property rights, limiting our companyability to alterlicense our schedule respective patents and/or determine thatdevelop or commercialize a product should not be pursued at all. You should understand thatcandidate. These appreciable advantages could render our plans regarding our products are subject to change.product candidates non-competitive or obsolete before we can recover the expenses of research, development, and commercialization.

20


Our revenues now are generated from being a food sciencescompetition includes pharmaceutical and products company. We should be considered to be a start-up: the revenue recognized for the year ended August 31, 2017 was $63,639.

The food industry is highly competitivebiotechnology companies, educational institutions, and there is no assurance that we will be successful in developing or successfully selling products.

The food industry is intensely competitive. We compete with numerous individuals and companies, including many food manufacturing and production companies, whichresearch foundations. They may have substantially greater technical, financialcapital resources, research and operational resourcesdevelopment workforce and staff. Accordingly, there is a high degree of competition for desirable distribution channels, “shelf space”facilities and salespeople in both the food industries as well as the legal cannabis industries. We cannot predict if the necessary funds can be raised to assist in our development of any distribution channels thatsuperior marketing experience than Lexaria. They may be helpfulable to respond more rapidly to new regulations and/or devote greater resources to the development and promotion of their business model. These third parties compete with us in recruiting and retaining qualified scientific and management personnel, establishing clinical trial sites and patient registration for clinical trials, and in acquiring technologies and technology licenses competitive to our programs or of potential use to our business.

Early-stage companies may also prove to be significant competitors, particularly through collaborative arrangements with large and established companies. Mergers and acquisitions in the pharmaceutical and biotechnology industries may result in even more resources being concentrated among a smaller number of our competitors and could increase their ability to generate sales and potential profits.rapidly gain market share.

There can be no assurance that we will develop any product that will meet with widespread consumer acceptance.

Both new and established food and cannabis products fail to generate consumer interest onAs a regular basis. There is no assurance that a food or cannabis product that is successfully adopted by consumers at one time; will still be in demand at a future time. If we cannot develop and sell products in commercial quantities, our business will fail.

Even if we develop food or intellectual property-based products or revenue streams, the potential profitability of each depends upon factors beyond the control of our company.

The potential profitability of food products and of intellectual property revenue streams is dependent upon many factors beyond our control. For instance, prices and markets for food products are unpredictable, highly volatile, potentially subject to controls or any combination or other factors, and respond to changes in domestic, international, political, social and economic environments. These changes and events may materially affect our future financial performance. These factors cannot be accurately predicted and the combinationresult of these factors, may resultmanagement cannot be certain that the Company will be able to compete against current or future competitors or that competitive pressure will not seriously harm our business.

Any failure in our company not receiving an adequate return on invested capital.

In addition, a product or technology that is initially successful and possibly even profitable may not remain so due to changes in consumer demand, regulatory environments, or other causes. There is no assurance that an initially successful product or technology will remain so.

Our failure to protectprotecting our intellectual property may have a materialnegative impact adverse effect on our ability to develop and commercialize our productslicence DehydraTECH.

Because patents involve complex legal and factual questions, the issuance, scope, validity, and enforceability of patents cannot be predicted with certainty.

Some of our patent pending applications maywill not be granted as patents. Even if patents are issued, they may not be issuedgranted with claims of sufficient breadth to protect our nutrient infusionDehydraTECH technology or may not provide us with a competitive advantage against competitors with similarover other products or technologies. Issued patents may be challenged, invalidated, or circumvented. If patents issued to usthey are invalidated or found to be unenforceable, we could lose the ability to exclude others from making, using, or selling the inventions claimed. Moreover, anAn issued patent does not give us the automatic right to use the patented technology or commercialize a product using the technology. Third parties may have blocking patents that could be used to prevent us from developing our products, selling our products, or commercializing our nutrient infusionDehydraTECH technology. Others may also independently develop products or technologies similar to those that we have developed or may reverse engineer or discover our trade secrets through proper means.

Enforcing

Technological R&D in the bioscience industry involves a claim that a third party infringes on, has illegally obtainedlengthy, expensive process with an uncertain outcome. We may incur additional costs or is using an intellectual property right, is expensiveexperience delays in completing, or ultimately be unable to complete our studies or trials.

We could encounter numerous unintended and time-consuming andunforeseen events including but not limited to the outcome is unpredictable. In addition, enforcing such a claim could divert management’s attention fromfollowing:

·

regulators or institutional review boards (“IRBs”), or ethics committees may not authorize us or our investigators to commence a study or trial at a prospective trial site. There is no assurance that we will be able to satisfy their approval conditions in a timely fashion if at all, whether due to financial or other unforeseen constraints;

·

the ability or failure to reach acceptable terms with prospective trial sites and contract research organizations (“CROs”). These terms can be subject to extensive negotiation and may vary significantly among different CROs and trial sites;

17

Table of Contents

·

the IRB may disagree with our design or change the requirements for approval even after it has incorporated their review and comments;

·

authorities may impose a hold on or suspend a program due to any number of factors, including a request for further information or other administrative actions, results of competitors programs, noncompliance with changing regulatory requirements or a finding that the participants are being exposed to unacceptable health risk or changes in governmental regulations;

·

studies or trials of various APIs may produce negative or inconclusive results. We may decide or regulators may require us to conduct additional studies or trials. We may decide to abandon development programs related to those APIs;

·

the number of participants required may be larger than anticipated. Participants may drop out or fail to return for follow-up at a higher rate than we anticipate. Initial enrolment may take longer than scheduled. We may be unable to recruit a sufficient number of suitable participants;

·

the participants and sites in our studies or trials may not comply with required protocols rendering the results insufficient or uninterpretable;

·

the cost of studies or trials of an API may be greater than anticipated and we may lack adequate funding to continue;

·

any changes in regulatory requirements and guidance that require amending or submitting new protocols;

·

regulators may require the submission of additional data or impose other requirements before granting permission to proceed.

Our R&D costs will increase with delays in testing and/or regulatory approvals. We do not know whether any of our business. If any intellectual property rights wereprojected studies or trials will begin as planned, will need to be infringed, disclosed to,restructured once commenced, or independently developed by a competitor, our competitive position could be harmed. Any adverse outcome of such litigation or settlement of such dispute could subject us to significant liabilities and could put one or more of our patent pending applications at risk of being invalidated.

21


Furthermore, because of the substantial amount of discovery required in connection with intellectual property litigation, there is risk that some of our confidential information could be compromised. This disclosure could provide our competitors with access to our proprietary information and may harm our competitive position.

The marketability of food products will be affected by numerous factors beyondcompleted on schedule, or at all. Any delays in our control which may result in us not receiving an adequate return on invested capital to be profitable or viable.

The marketabilitydevelopment programs could significantly impact our share value, business prospects, financial condition, and results of food products will be affected by numerous factors beyond our control. These factors include market fluctuations in consumer preferences for various food items based on factors such as pricing, macro trends for certain ingredients or flavors, ruling by regulators on health issues associated with certain foods, and more. The exact effect of these factors cannot be accurately predicted, but the combination of these factors may result in us not receiving an adequate return on invested capital to be profitable or viable.

Both food products and cannabis products are subject to comprehensive regulation which may cause substantial delays or require capital outlays in excess of those anticipated causing an adverse effect on our company.

Food production and safety operations, and cannabis products and sales operations, are subject to federal, state, and local laws relating to the protection of human health and safety. Food production and cannabis operations are each also subject to federal, state, and local laws and regulations which seek to maintain health and safety standards through a wide variety of regulations. Various permits from government bodies may be required by us in order to conduct our business. Regulations and standards imposed by federal, provincial, or local authorities may be changed at any moment in time and any such changes may have material adverse effects on our activities. Changes in regulations are impossible to foresee and could be disruptive or destructive to our business plans and execution. Moreover, compliance with such laws may cause substantial delays or require capital outlays in excess of those anticipated, thus causing an adverse effect on us. Additionally, we may be subject to liability for contaminants or other damages. To date, we have not been required to spend any material amount on compliance with environmental regulations. However, we may be required to do so in the future and this may affect our ability to expand or maintain our operations.

If we are unable to hireobtain and retain key personnel, wemaintain sufficient patent protection, or if the scope of the patent protection is not sufficiently broad, our competitors could develop technology similar to ours.

We may not be able to implementeffectively enforce our business plan.

Our success is largely dependent on our ability to hire highly qualified personnel. This is particularly true in those parts of our business that are related to intellectual property generation or exploitation. These individuals are in high demand and we may not be able to attractrights throughout the personnel we need. In addition, we may not be able to afford the high salaries and fees demanded by qualified personnel, or may lose such employees after they are hired. Failure to hire key personnel when needed, or on acceptable terms, would have a significant negative effect on our business.

We are not the "operator" of vertically integrated food production facilities, and so we are exposed to the risks of our third-party operators.

We rely on the expertise of contracted third-parties for their judgment, experience and advice related to the manufacturing and/or packaging of our food products. We can give no assurance that these third party operators or consultants will always act in our best interests, and we are exposed as a third party to their operations and actions and advice in those operations and activities in which we are contractually bound.

22


Our management has limited experience and training in the food processing and manufacturing industries, and in the cannabis products industries, and could make uninformed decisions that negatively impact our operations and our company.

Because our management has limited experience and training in the food processing and manufacturing industry, and in the cannabis products industry, we may not have sufficient expertise to make informed best practices decisions regarding our operations. It is possible that, due to our limited knowledge, we might elect to undergo manufacturing processes and incur financial burdens that a more experienced food manufacturing team might elect not to complete.world. Our ability to internally evaluate foodprotect and cannabis operations and opportunities couldenforce our intellectual property rights may be less thorough than thatadversely affected by unforeseen changes in foreign intellectual property laws. Patent laws of a more highly trained management team.

Our independent certified public accounting firm, in the notessome foreign countries do not provide protection to the audited financial statementssame extent as the laws of the United States. These factors could make it difficult for us to stop the year ended August 31, 2016 states that there is ainfringement of our patents or the misappropriation of our intellectual property rights. Legal actions to enforce our patent rights in foreign jurisdictions could result in substantial doubtcosts and divert our efforts and resources from other aspects of our business. We cannot ensure that we will be able to continue as a going concern.initiate or maintain legal efforts in all jurisdictions which could limit the markets for our technology and reduce possible future revenues.

We are dependent on the services of third parties and unsatisfactory performance will negatively affect our Company.

We have experienced significant losses since inception. Failurerely on third parties to arrange adequate financing on acceptable termsconduct, supervise, and monitor our R&D programs. Third-party service providers are not our employees, and except for remedies available to achieve profitability would have an adverse effect onus under contract, we cannot control whether or not they devote sufficient time, skill, and resources to our financial position,programs. We remain responsible for ensuring that each of our programs are conducted in accordance with the applicable protocol, legal, regulatory and scientific standards.

If third parties do not successfully carry out their contractual duties in meeting expected deadlines or not conducting our R&D programs or preclinical studies as prescribed, if the quality or accuracy of the data they obtain is compromised due to the failure to adhere to our protocols, regulatory requirements or for other reasons, we or our collaborators may be subject to regulatory enforcement or other legal actions.

Resultant data generated in our preclinical programs may be deemed unreliable and our studies and trials may need to be repeated, extended, delayed, or terminated. We may be delayed in or unable to obtain marketing approvals for our product candidates or to successfully commercialize our product candidates. As a result, our results of operations cash flows and prospects. As a result of the financings completed during the year ended August 31 2017, management believes it has sufficient funds to meet its obligations as they become duecommercial prospects for the next twelve months.

The possession, cultivationour product candidates would be harmed, our costs could increase and distribution of marijuana may under certain circumstances lead to prosecution under United States federal law, which may cause our business to fail.

All applicable Regulations, in the United Sates, over 20 states, including our state of incorporation, Nevada, have approved and regulate medical marijuana use. Similarly, four states have approved and regulate non-medical marijuana use by adults. However, it remains illegal under United States federal law to grow, cultivate or sell marijuana for any purpose. In that regard, the United States Justice Department has released the COLE Memorandum of 8-29-13 which states that the Justice Department will not prioritize the prosecution of marijuana related activities authorized under state laws provided that state authorities implement and enforce strict guidelines to ensure the health, safety and security of the public. Where the individual state framework fails to protect the public, the Justice Department has instructed federal prosecutors to enforce the Controlled Substances Act of 1970. The Department of Justice has not, to our knowledge, published any policy or guidance specifically regarding the participation of a United States corporation in lawful medical marijuana related activities outside of the United States.

We do not currently, nor at any time in our corporate history have we ever cultivated, grown, processed, manufactured or sold marijuana in any location. Although we believe this fact to provide protection against prosecution related to marijuana legislation, we cannot provide any assurance to that effect. We do not hold a license in any jurisdiction enabling us to grow or sell marijuana or cannabis related edibles, but because of our business model we do not feel that is a barrier to entry for us. Instead, we plan to license our technology related to bio-absorption of THC, to those entities that do have valid licenses in various North American jurisdictions to sell cannabis related edibles. If we are unable to license our technology to any valid license holders, then we may be shut out of this market.

Our company has no operating history and an evolving business model, which raises doubt about our ability to achieve profitability or obtain financing.generate revenues could be delayed.

Our company has no significant history of operations in

We also rely on third party suppliers and manufacturers to provide us with the legal medical marijuana sector, the legal hemp oil infused products sector, or in the food products sector. Moreover,facilities, materials, and services to manufacture our business model is still evolving and subject to change. Our company's ability to continue as a going concern is dependent upon our ability to obtain adequate financing and to reach profitable levels of operations. In that regard we have no proven history of performance, earnings or success. There can be no assurance that we will achieve profitability or obtain future financing.

Uncertain demandDehydraTECH compounds for our products may causeresearch programs and our business plan to be unprofitable.

Demand for medical marijuana and for cannabis or hemp related productsB2B customers. It is dependent on a number of social, political and economic factors that are beyond the control of our company. While we believe that demand for marijuana and hemp products will continue to grow across North America, there is no assurancepossible that such increase in demand will happen or that our endeavors will be profitable.

23


Wethird parties may not acquire market share or achieve profits due to competition in our industries.

Our company operates in highly competitive marketplaces with various competitors. Increased competition may result in reduced gross margins and/or loss of market share, either of which would seriously harm its business and results of operations. Management cannot be certain that the company will be able to compete against current or future competitors or that competitive pressure will not seriously harm its business. Some of our company's competitors are much larger and have greater access to capital, sales, marketing and other resources. These competitors may be able to respond more rapidly to new regulations or devote greater resources to the development and promotion ofsuccessfully carry out their business model than the company can. Furthermore, some of these competitors may make acquisitions or establish co-operative relationships among themselves or with third parties in the industry to increase their ability to rapidly gain market share.

Conflicts of interest between our company and our directors and officers may result in a loss of business opportunity.

Our directors and officers are not obligated to commit their full time and attentioncontractual obligations, meet expected deadlines, adhere to our business and, accordingly, they may encounter a conflict of interest in allocating their time between our future operations and those of other businesses. In the course of their other business activities, they may become aware of investment and business opportunities which may be appropriate for presentation to us as well as other entities to which they owe a fiduciary duty. As a result, they may have conflicts of interest in determining to which entity a particular business opportunity should be presented. They may also in the future become affiliatedprotocols, or comply with entities, engaged in business activities similar to those we intend to conduct.

In general, officers and directors of a corporation are required to present business opportunities to a corporation if:

We have adopted a code of ethics that obligates our directors, officers and employees to disclose potential conflicts of interest and prohibits those persons from engaging in such transactions without our consent. Despite our intentions, conflicts of interest may nevertheless arise which may deprive our company of a business opportunity, which may impede the successful development of our business and negatively impact the value of an investment in our company.

The speculative nature of our business plan may result in the loss of your investment.

Our operations are in the start-up stage only, and are unproven. We may not be successful in implementing our business plan to become profitable. There may be less demand for our services than we anticipate. There is no assurance that our business will succeed and you may lose your entire investment.

Changing consumer preferences may cause our planned products to be unsuccessful in the marketplace.

The decision of a potential client to purchase our products may be motivated by cultural phenomenalost revenue or by perceived health or nutritional benefits. The cultural desirability or popularity of hemp related products is subject to change due to factors beyond our immediate control. Similarly, the perceived nutritional or health related benefits of our products are subject to change in light of continuing research or the introduction of competitive products. Changes in consumer and commercial preferences, or trends, toward or away from cannabis or hemp related products would have a corresponding impact on the development of the market for our current and planned products. There can be no assurance that the products supplied by our company and or its partners will be successful in establishing or maintaining a significant share of the consumer market.

24


General economic factors may negatively impact the market for our planned products.

The willingness of businesses to spend time and money on non-essential food and health products may be dependent upon general economic conditions; and any material downturn may reduce the likelihood of consumers incurring costs toward what some may consider a discretionary expense item. Willingness by customers to buy our products may be dependent upon general economic conditions and any material downturn may reduce the potential profitability of the food sciences or medical marijuana business sectors.

A wide range of economic and logistical factors may negatively impact our operating results.

Our operating results will be affected by a wide variety of factors that could materially affect revenues and profitability, including the timing and cancellation of customer orders and projects, competitive pressures on pricing, availability of personnel, and market acceptance of our services. As a result, we may experience material fluctuations in future operating results on a quarterly and annual basis which could materially affect our business, financial condition and operating results.

Loss of consumer confidence in our company or in our industry may harm our business.

program delays. Demand for our services may be adversely affected if consumerscustomers lose confidence in the quality of our services or the industry’s practices. Adverse publicity may discourage businesses from buyingcontracting our services and could have a material adverse effect on future revenue generation.

Agreements with third parties conducting services on our behalf might terminate for a variety of reasons, including a failure to perform by the third parties. If any of these terminate, we may be unable to enter into arrangements with alternative providers or to do so on commercially reasonable terms. Switching or adding additional third parties involve increased management time, focus, regulatory approvals and/or additional cost. Any delays in our manufacturing capabilities or research studies may have a material adverse impact on our business, financial condition and results of operations.prospects.

Unethical business practices may compromise the growth

18

Table of Contents

Any failure to prevent or mitigate security breaches and developmentimproper access to or disclosure of our business.data or our user data could result in the loss or misuse of such data, which could harm our business and reputation and diminish our competitive position

The production

Awareness and salesensitivity to personal data breaches and cyber security threats is at an all-time high. Our computer systems and those of medical marijuana isour contractors and consultants are vulnerable to damage from unauthorized access, computer viruses, telecommunications and electrical failures, and natural disasters. If such an emerging industryevent were to occur and cause interruptions in our operations, it could result in a material disruption of our R&D programs. We depend on digital technologies for the successful operation of our business, including corporate email communications to and from employees, licensees, consultants and third-party providers, collection, use and retention of investor data, security systems with respect to our Health Canada licensed laboratory and maintenance of confidential information.

As part of our business model, we collect, retain, and transmit confidential information over public networks. We may be vulnerable to targeted or random personal data or security breaches, acts of vandalism, computer malware, misplaced or lost data, programming and/or human errors, or other similar events. Any misappropriation of our internal confidential or personal information gathered, stored or used by us, be it intentional or accidental, could have a material impact on the operation of our business, including severely damaging our reputation and our relationships with licensees, employees and investors. We may incur further significant costs implementing additional security measures to protect against new or enhanced data security or privacy threats, or to comply with current and new international, federal, and state laws governing the unauthorized disclosure of confidential and personal information which business practices are not yet standardizedcontinuously being enacted. We could also experience loss of revenues resulting from unauthorized use of proprietary information including our intellectual property. We could also face sizable fines, significant breach containment and arenotification costs to supervisory authorities and the affected data subjects, and increased litigation as a result of cyber security or personal data breaches.

We may be subject to frequent scrutiny and evaluation by federal, state, provincial, and municipal authorities, academics, and media outlets, among others, Although we intend to developclaims that our business in accordance with best ethical practices, we may suffer negative publicity if we, our partners,employees, consultants, or independent contractors have wrongfully used or customers are found to have engaged in any environmentally, insensitive practices or other business practices that are viewed as unethical.disclosed alleged trade secrets.

The failure to secure customers may cause our operations to fail.

We currently do not have many long-term agreements with any customers. Many ofemploy, and may employ in the future, individuals who were previously employed at other biotechnology or pharmaceutical companies, including our products and services may be provided on a “onetime” basis. Accordingly, we will require new customers on a continuous basis to sustain our operations.

competitors or potential competitors. We could be requiredsubject to enterclaims that the Company or our employees, consultants or independent contractors have inadvertently or otherwise used or disclosed trade secrets or other proprietary information of their former employers. Successful claims could result in our loss of valuable intellectual property rights or personnel in addition to suffering monetary damages. Even if we are successful in any litigation, it could result in substantial costs and be a distraction to management with an adverse impact on our business.

Risks related to the effects of COVID-19

The outbreak of the coronavirus (COVID-19) has evolved into fixed price contractsa global pandemic. The extent to which will expose us to significant market risk.

Fixed price contracts require the service provider to perform all agreed services for a specified lump-sum amount. We anticipate a material percentage of our services will be performed on a fixed price basis. Fixed price contracts expose us to some significant risks, including under-estimation of costs, ambiguities in specifications, unforeseen costs or difficulties, and delays beyond our control. These risks could lead to losses on contracts which may be substantial and which could adversely affect the results of our operations.

If we fail to effectively and efficiently advertise, the growth ofvirus impacts our business and operating results will depend on future developments that are highly uncertain and cannot be accurately predicted, including new information that may emerge concerning the virus, its variants, and the actions to contain the coronavirus or treat its impact, among others.

With the continued spread of the virus, our business operations could be compromised.

The future growth and profitability ofinterrupted or delayed. It is possible that our food products business willR&D programs could be dependent in part onadversely affected by the effectiveness and efficiency of our advertising and promotional expenditures, includingrestrictions imposed during the pandemic. Travel restrictions, lock-down quarantines or other such limitations may hamper our ability to (i) create greater awarenessconduct our R & D programs. In some of our services, (ii) determineprograms, particularly our human studies, participant recruitment and enrolment, participant dosing, distribution of results, study monitoring and data analysis may be paused or delayed due to the appropriate creative messageeffects that the pandemic has in different localities. If the virus continues to spread, some participants and media mix for future advertising expenditures, and (iii) effectively manage advertising and promotional costs in order to maintain acceptable operating margins. There can be no assurance that we will experience benefits from advertising and promotional expenditures in the future. In addition, no assurance can be given that our planned advertising and promotional expenditures will result in increased revenues, will generate levels of service and name awareness or that we willclinical investigators may not be able to manage such advertisingcomply with clinical trial protocols. We currently utilize third parties to conduct our R&D programs and promotional expenditures on a cost-effective basis.

25


Our successin the production of our B2B customers’ products. These relationships could be adversely impacted by any future covid-related restrictions. It is dependent onpossible that our unproven ability to attract qualified personnel.

We will depend onsupply chain may be disrupted, limiting our ability to attract, retainmanufacture products for our R&D operations or for our B2B customers.

The spread of COVID-19 and motivate our management team, consultants and other employees. There is strong competition for qualified technical and management personnel in the food science sector, and it is expected that such competition will increase. Our planned growth will place increased demandsits variants has caused a broad global impact which could have a material economic effect on our existing resources and will likely requirebusiness. While the addition of technical personnelpotential economic impact brought by and the developmentduration of additional expertise by existing personnel. There canthe pandemic may be no assurance thatdifficult to assess or predict, it has already caused, and is likely to result in further significant disruption of global financial markets, which may reduce our compensation packages will be sufficientability to ensureaccess capital either on favorable terms or at all. Inflation and recession or other sustained adverse economic events resulting from the continued availability of qualified personnel who are necessarypandemic could materially and adversely affect our business and the market for the developmentor value of our business.common stock.

19

Table of Contents

B. Risks Associated with our Financial Condition

Without additional financing to develop our business plan, our business may fail.

Because we

We have generated only minimal revenue from our business and cannot anticipate when we will be able to generate meaningful revenue from our business, we will need to raise additional funds to conduct and grow our business. We do not currently have sufficient financial resources to completely fund the development of our business plan. We anticipate that we will need to raise further financing.financing to conduct and grow our business. We do not currently have any arrangements for financing and we can provide no assurance to investors that we will be able to findsecure such financing if required.financing. The most likely source of future funds presently available to us is through the sale of equity capital. Any sale of share capital will result in dilution to existing security-holders.

The longer-term growth of our business depends on our ability to expand our portfolio of patents and industry segments where DehydraTECH is demonstrably applicable, which may require substantial financial resources and may ultimately be unsuccessful.

There can be no assurance that we will achieve significant revenues or profitable operations or will generate adequate funds to continue our intellectual property development. Many factors, such as competition, patent protection, appropriate regulatory approvals, availability of personnel, and market acceptance of our services can influence the revenue and profitability potential. As a result, we may experience material fluctuations in future operating results on a quarterly and annual basis which could materially affect our business, financial condition, and operating results.

The R&D programs required to evidence that DehydraTECH’s demonstrated efficacy also works with other APIs and molecules to develop the evidence may ultimately be unsuccessful. We cannot be certain that our overall business model within any particular sector will ever come to fruition, and if they do, may not generate meaningful profits. We may not recover all or any portion of our capital investment in our research and technology development, marketing, or other aspects of the business.

We may enter into collaborations with third parties for the development and commercialization of our product candidates. If we fail to enter into such collaborations, or such collaborations are not successful, we may not be able to obtain allcapitalize on the market potential of our product candidates.

We face significant competition in seeking appropriate partners. Our ability to reach a definitive agreement in any collaboration depends in part on our assessment of their resources, expertise and intent, the terms and conditions of the licensesproposed agreement and the evaluation of numerous factors by the proposed collaborator. Our ability to generate revenues from these arrangements will depend on our collaborators’ abilities to successfully perform the functions assigned to them in these arrangements.

If we are unable to reach agreements with suitable collaborators on a timely basis, on acceptable terms, or at all, we may have to curtail the development of a product candidate, reduce or delay our development programs. This might delay our potential development schedule or reduce the scope of research activities or increase our expenditures. We may have to undertake further discovery or preclinical development activities at our own expense. If we fail to enter into collaborations and do not have sufficient funds or expertise to undertake the necessary development activities, we may not be able to operatefurther develop our product candidates or continue to develop our product candidates and our business may be materially and adversely affected.

Future collaborations may involve the following risks whereby collaborators may:

·

not perform their obligations as expected or terminated an agreement for their convenience. If terminated, we could be required to raise additional capital to pursue further development or commercialization of the applicable product candidates. We could face difficulty in attracting new collaborators. The markets’ perception of our business could be adversely affected.

·

have significant discretion in determining the efforts and resources that they will apply. We would have limited control over the amount and timing of resources. They may provide insufficient funding for product development of our selected targets.

·

have us repeat or conduct new discovery and preclinical development or delay, stop or abandon discovery and preclinical development of a product candidate.

·

view product candidates discovered in collaboration as competitive with their existing product candidates or products. They may cease to devote resources to the development of collaborative product candidates.

·

independently develop, or develop with third parties, products that compete directly or indirectly with our products or product candidates if they conclude that competitive products are more likely to be successfully developed than our products.

·

use their proprietary information in such a way as to invite litigation that could jeopardize or invalidate our intellectual property.

·

become involved in a business combination which, subject to its contractual obligations, might detract from or terminate the development of any of our product candidates.

C. Risk Associated with Current Regulatory Environments

Our product candidates are in an early stage of development and may fail or experience significant delays or may never advance to the clinical stage, which would causemay materially and adversely impact our businessbusiness.

All of our R&D programs are in the preclinical development stage and our future success heavily depends on the successful development of our DehydraTECH product candidates which may never occur. These product candidates could be delayed, not advance into the clinic, or unexpectedly fail at any stage of development. Before we can commence clinical trials for a product candidate, we must conduct extensive preclinical and other non-clinical tests in order to fail.

Our operations may require licensessupport an investigational new drug (“IND”) application, including IND-enabling good laboratory practice toxicology studies. Preclinical studies and permits from various governmental authoritiesclinical trials are expensive, difficult to conduct our business activities. We believedesign and can take many years. There is no assurance that we will be able to obtain all necessary licensessuccessfully develop our product candidates, and permits under applicable lawswe may focus our efforts and regulations for our operationsresources on product candidates that may prove to be unsuccessful.

20

Table of Contents

We cannot be certain of the outcome of preclinical testing and believe weclinical studies and results from these studies may not predict the results that will be obtained in later phase trials of our product candidates. Even if we are able to complycomplete our preclinical studies and planned clinical trials in all material respectsline with the terms ofour projected timelines, results from such licensesstudies and permits. However,trials may be not replicated in subsequent preclinical studies or clinical trial results. Additionally, such licenses and permits are subjectstudies may be delayed due to change in various circumstances. There can be noevents beyond our control. As a result, we cannot guarantee that we will be able to submit INDs, or similar applications, within our projected timelines, if at all, or that the FDA, or similar regulatory authorities, will allow us to commence clinical trials.

Pharmaceutical products incorporating DehydraTECH has never been approved for the treatment of disease.

In order to commercialize a product that utilizes DehydraTECH for the treatment of any disease, we and/or our commercial partner must obtain regulatory product approvals for treatment of a particular indication. Satisfying regulatory requirements is an expensive process that typically takes many years. There are compliance requirements covering R&D, testing, manufacturing, quality control, labelling, and promotion of drugs for human use. To obtain necessary regulatory approvals we must complete clinical trials demonstrating that our product is safe and effective for a particular indication. There can be no assurance that any product enhanced by DehydraTECH will be proven to be safe and effective, that clinical trials will demonstrate the necessary safety and effectiveness of the product candidates, or maintain allthat we will be successful in obtaining regulatory approval for any treatment developed, even if such safety and effectiveness are demonstrated.

We may encounter obstacles in obtaining regulatory approval from the FDA or other international regulatory organizations during clinical trials including:

·

clinical trials may not yield sufficiently conclusive results for regulatory agencies to approve the use of DehydraTECH;

·

DehydraTECH enhanced formulations may fail to be more effective than current therapies, or to be effective at all;

·

DehydraTECH enhanced formulations may have adverse side effects, which could cause them to be delayed or precluded from receiving regulatory approval or otherwise expose us to significant commercial and legal risks;

·

it may take longer than expected to determine whether or not a treatment is effective;

·

patients involved in the clinical trials may suffer severe adverse side effects even up to death, whether as a result of treatment with DehydraTECH enhanced formulations, the withholding of such treatment, or other reasons whether within or outside of our control;

·

patients enrolled in the clinical trials may not have the characteristics necessary to obtain regulatory approval for a particular indication or patient population;

·

failure to obtain and/or maintain, any required governmental approvals;

·

if approval for commercialization is granted, it is possible the authorized use will be more limited than is necessary for commercial success, or that approval may be conditioned on completion of further clinical trials or other activities, which will cause a substantial increase in costs;

·

if granted, approval may be withdrawn or limited if problems with DehydraTECH enhanced formulations emerge or are suggested by the data arising from their use or if there is a change in law or regulation.

Any success achieved at a given stage of the clinical trials does not guarantee that the future achievement of success at any subsequent stage, including without limitation, final FDA approval.

Delays or rejections in the regulatory approval process because of additional government regulation resulting from future legislation or administrative action, or from changes in the policies of the FDA or other regulatory bodies during the period of product development, clinical trials, or regulatory review may occur. Failure to comply with applicable regulatory requirements may result in criminal prosecution, civil penalties, recall or seizure of products, total or partial suspension of production, or an injunction preventing certain activity, as well as other regulatory action against our product candidates or our Company.

We currently have no commercial pharmaceutical products and therefore generate no revenue from pharmaceutical products and may never be able to develop marketable pharmaceutical products. We have no experience in filing the applications necessary licensesto obtain approval and permits.expect that we will need to rely on CROs and regulatory consultants to assist us with this process. Regulatory approval also requires the submission about the product manufacturing process and the inspection of the manufacturing facilities. Our success is dependent on our or a third parties’ ability to successfully navigate the risks and obstacles associated with obtaining FDA clearance for any DehydraTECH enhanced formulated product.

If

21

Table of Contents

Pharmaceutical products using DehydraTECH with CBD as an API have never been approved for the treatment of any disease.

To date the FDA has approved only limited use of cannabinoids for the treatment of any disease or condition. The FDA has approved one cannabinoid-derived drug product for the treatment of seizures associated with Lennox-Gastaut syndrome and Dravet syndrome and three synthetic cannabinoid-related drug products for the treatment of nausea and vomiting caused by cancer chemotherapy. While we failexpect any product candidates that we develop will be regulated as a new drug under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, the FDA could decide to effectively manage our growth ourregulate them or any other products incorporating DehydraTECH under a different regulatory regime. The lack of policies, practices or guidelines may hinder or slow review by the FDA of any regulatory filings that we may submit. The FDA may respond to these submissions by defining requirements that we may not have anticipated.

Regulation of non-pharmaceutical hemp-based CBD products is evolving.

We cannot predict the nature of any future business results could be harmed and our managerial and operational resourceslaws, regulations, interpretations, or their application to non-pharmaceutical hemp-based CBD. It is probable that regulations may be strained.enacted that will be directly applicable to our business. Violations, alleged or otherwise, could disrupt our business or the business of our licensees. Any compliance deficiencies with future government regulation could increase our operating costs.

As we proceed with

In the US, interstate shipment of hemp-derived non-pharmaceutical CBD from one state to another is legal only where both states have laws and regulations that allow for the production and sale of such products and that qualify under the Farm Bill. The marketing and sale of DehydraTECH products containing hemp-derived non-pharmaceutical CBD is limited by such factors and is restricted to such states. A repeal or adverse amendment of laws and regulations that are now favorable to the distribution, marketing, and sale of finished products of hemp-derived CBD our licensees intend to sell could significantly limit, restrict, or prevent us from generating revenue related to these DehydraTECH enabled non-pharmaceutical products. Any such repeal or adverse amendment of now favorable laws and regulations could have an adverse impact on our business plan we expectwith respect to experience significant and rapid growthsuch revenues.

Controlled substance legislation differs between localities. Legislation in the scope and complexity ofcertain jurisdictions may restrict or limit our business. We will need to add staff to market our services, manage operations, handle sales and marketing efforts and perform finance and accounting functions. We will be required to hire a broad range of additional personnel in order to successfully advance our operations. This growth is likely to place a strain on our management and operational resources. The failureability to develop and implement effective systems, orcommercialize products using DehydraTECH.

We currently have licensees who produce hemp-derived non-pharmaceutical CBD products. The Farm Bill delegates the authority to hirethe states to regulate and retain sufficient personnellimit the production of these products within their territories. Many states now have laws and regulations that allow for the performanceproduction and sale of all of the functions necessary to effectively servicehemp-derived CBD products. We can offer no assurance that these state laws will not be repealed or amended which could render these products illegal. Such actions would adversely impact our product revenue and manage our potential business, or the failure to manage growth effectively, could have a materially adverse effect on our business and financial condition.royalties derived from DehydraTECH-enabled CBD products.

D. Risks Associated with OurSecurities Markets and Ownership of our Common Stock

Trading on

The trading price of the OCTQB and CSE may be volatile and sporadic, which could depress the market priceshares of our common stock could be highly volatile and make it difficultas such investors could incur substantial losses.

Prospects for our stockholders to resell their shares.

Our common stock is quoted oncompanies in the OTCQB electronic quotation service operated by OTC Markets Group Inc. Tradingbiotechnology industry may be regarded generally as uncertain given the nature of the industry and, accordingly, investments in stock quoted on the OTCQB is often thinbiotechnology companies should be regarded as speculative. We have experienced erratic share price and characterized by wide fluctuations in trading prices, due to many factors that may have little to do with our operations or business prospects. This volatility could depress the market pricevolume movement of our common stock for reasons unrelatedwhich could be influenced by any number of factors including those extraneous to our operating performance. Moreover, the OTCQB isperformance and business prospects.

Our by-laws do not contain anti-takeover provisions, which could result in a stock exchange, and trading of securities on the OTCQB is often more sporadic than the trading of securities listed on a quotation system like NASDAQ or a stock exchange like Amex. Accordingly, shareholders may have difficulty reselling any of the shares.

26


Our stock is a penny stock. Tradingchange of our stock may be restricted by the Securitiesexecutive management and Exchange Commission’s penny stock regulations which may limit a stockholder’s ability to buy and sell our stock.

Our stock is a penny stock. The Securities and Exchange Commission has adopted Rule 15g-9 which generally defines “penny stock” to be any equity security that has a market price (as defined) less than $5.00 per share or an exercise price of less than $5.00 per share, subject to certain exceptions. Our securities are covered by the penny stock rules, which impose additional sales practice requirements on broker-dealers who sell to persons other than established customers and “accredited investors”. The term “accredited investor” refers generally to institutions with assets in excess of $5,000,000 or individuals with a net worth in excess of $1,000,000 or annual income exceeding $200,000 or $300,000 jointly with their spouse. The penny stock rules require a broker-dealer, prior to a transaction in a penny stock not otherwise exempt from the rules, to deliver a standardized risk disclosure document in a form prepared by the Securities and Exchange Commission which provides information about penny stocks and the nature and level of risks in the penny stock market. The broker-dealer also must provide the customer with current bid and offer quotations for the penny stock, the compensation of the broker-dealer and its salesperson in the transaction and monthly account statements showing the market value of each penny stock held in the customer’s account. The bid and offer quotations, and the broker-dealer and salesperson compensation information, must be given to the customer orally or in writing prior to effecting the transaction and must be given to the customer in writing before or with the customer’s confirmation. In addition, the penny stock rules require that prior to a transaction in a penny stock not otherwise exempt from these rules, the broker-dealer must make a special written determination that the penny stock is a suitable investment for the purchaser and receive the purchaser’s written agreement to the transaction. These disclosure requirements may have the effect of reducing the level of trading activity in the secondary market for the stock that is subject to these penny stock rules. Consequently, these penny stock rules may affect the ability of broker-dealers to trade our securities. We believe that the penny stock rules discourage investor interest in and limit the marketability of our common stock.

The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, or FINRA, has adopted sales practice requirements which may also limit a stockholder’s ability to buy and sell our stock.

In addition to the “penny stock” rules described above, FINRA has adopted rules that require that in recommending an investment to a customer, a broker-dealer must have reasonable grounds for believing that the investment is suitable for that customer. Prior to recommending speculative low priced securities to their non-institutional customers, broker-dealers must make reasonable efforts to obtain information about the customer’s financial status, tax status, investment objectives and other information. Under interpretations of these rules, FINRA believes thatdirectors if there is a high probability that speculative low priced securities willtake-over of our Company.

We do not be suitablecurrently have a shareholder rights plan or any anti-takeover provisions in our by-laws. Without any anti-takeover provisions, there is no deterrent for at least some customers. FINRA requirements make it more difficult for broker-dealers to recommend that their customers buyan unwanted take-over of our common stock, which may limit your ability to buy and sell our stock and have an adverse effect on the market for our shares.Company. This could result in a change of management, business strategy, a lower enterprise valuation than anticipated and/or dilution of current shareholdings.

Because we

We do not intend to pay any dividends on our shares, investors seeking dividend income or liquidity should not purchase our shares.

We have not declared or paid any dividends on our shares since inception, and do not anticipate paying any such dividends for the foreseeable future.inception. We presently do not anticipate that we will pay dividends on any of our common stock in the foreseeable future. If payment of dividends does occur at some point in the future, it would be contingent upon our revenues and earnings, if any, capital requirements, and general financial condition. The payment of any common stock dividends will be within the discretion of our Board of Directors. We presently intend to retain allany earnings to implement our business plan; accordingly, we do not anticipate the declaration of any dividends for common stock in the foreseeable future.

plan. Investors seeking dividend income or liquidity should not invest in our shares.

Because we can issue additional shares, purchasers

Purchasers of our shares may incur immediate dilution and may experience further dilution.

We are authorized to issue up to 220,000,000 shares. The board of directors of our companyOur Board has the authority to cause us to issueapprove additional shares,share issuances, and to determine the rights, preferences, and privileges of such shares, without consent of any of our stockholders. Consequently, our stockholdersWe may experience moreissue shares in the future to raise working capital resulting in shareholders dilution in theirthe ownership of our company in the future.Company.

27


22

Table of Contents

Other Risks

Protection against environmental risks.

We believe that our operations comply, in all material respects, with all applicable environmental regulations.

Our operating partners maintain insurance coverage customary to the industry; however, we are not fully insured against all possible environmental risks.

Any change to government regulation/administrative practices may have a negative impact on our ability to operate and our profitability.

The laws, regulations, policies or current administrative practices of any government body, organization or regulatory agency in the United States, Canada, or any other jurisdiction, may be changed, applied or interpreted in a manner which will fundamentally alter the ability of our company to carry on our business.

The actions, policies or regulations, or changes thereto, of any government body or regulatory agency, or other special interest groups, may have a detrimental effect on us. Any or all of these situations may have a negative impact on our ability to operate and/or our profitably.

Our by-laws contain provisions indemnifying our officers and directors against all costs, charges and expenses incurred by them.

Our by-laws contain provisions with respect to the indemnification of our officers and directors against all costs, charges and expenses, including an amount paid to settle an action or satisfy a judgment, actually and reasonably incurred by him, including an amount paid to settle an action or satisfy a judgment in a civil, criminal or administrative action or proceeding to which he is made a party by reason of his being or having been one of our directors or officers.

Investors’ interests in our company will be diluted and investors may suffer dilution in their net book value per share if we issue additional shares or raise funds through the sale of equity securities.

Our constating documents authorize the issuance of 220,000,000 shares of common stock with a par value of $0.001. In the event that we are required to issue any additional shares or enter into private placements to raise financing through the sale of equity securities, investors’ interests in our company will be diluted and investors may suffer dilution in their net book value per share depending on the price at which such securities are sold. If we issue any such additional shares, such issuances also will cause a reduction in the proportionate ownership and voting power of all other shareholders. Further, any such issuance may result in a change in our control.

Our by-laws do not contain anti-takeover provisions, which could result in a change of our management and directors if there is a take-over of our company.

We do not currently have a shareholder rights plan or any anti-takeover provisions in our By-laws. Without any anti-takeover provisions, there is no deterrent for a take-over of our company, which may result in a change in our management and directors.

28


As a result of a majority of our directors and officers are residents of other countries other than the United States, investors may find it difficult to enforce, within the United States, any judgments obtained against our company or our directors and officers.

Other than our operations offices in Kelowna, British Columbia, we do not currently maintain a permanent place of business within the United States. In addition, a majority of our directors and officers are nationals and/or residents of countries other than the United States, and all or a substantial portion of such persons’ assets are located outside the United States. As a result, it may be difficult for investors to enforce within the United States any judgments obtained against our company or our officers or directors, including judgments predicated upon the civil liability provisions of the securities laws of the United States or any state thereof.

Trends, risks and uncertainties.

We have sought to identify what we believe to be the most significant risks to our business, but we cannot predict whether, or to what extent, any of such risks may be realized nor can we guarantee that we have identified all possible risks that might arise. Investors should carefully consider all of such risk factors before making an investment decision with respect to our common shares.

Item 1B.      Unresolved Staff Comments

As a “smaller reporting company”, under the SEC’s disclosure rules and have elected to comply with the reduced disclosure requirements applicable to smaller reporting companies.

As a smaller reporting company, we have elected to adopt the accommodations for scaled-back disclosure in our SEC filings, resulting in less information about our Company being available compared to other public companies. We are also a non-accelerated filer and are not required to comply with the auditor attestation requirements of Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. Our internal controls over financial reporting will not receive the level of review provided by the process relating to the auditor attestation included in annual reports of issuers that are subject to these requirements.

We cannot predict if investors will find our common shares less attractive because we are not required to providecomply with more robust disclosure or the information required by this Item.auditor attestation requirements. If investors find our common shares less attractive as a result, there may be a less active trading market for our common shares and trading prices may be negatively affected.

Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments

None.

Item 2. Properties

Executive Offices

Description of Property

The address of our principal executive officeCompany is 156 Valleyview Road,located in Kelowna, BCBritish Columbia Canada V1X3M4, where we share ~1,200in a leased facility with 2,250 square feet of office space which includes several offices forto accommodate our finance and administrative functions and a monthly rentalHealth Canada approved research lab of CAD$1,052. Our telephone number is (250) 765 6424. We have an additional administrative office spaceapproximately 1,000 square feet accommodating our in-house research and development team. The current lease commenced in Langley British ColumbiaNovember 2019 and Phoenix Arizona at nominal costs. Our current locations provide adequate office space for our purposes at this stage of our development.

Significant Acquisitions and Dispositions

Onexpires November 12, 2014, the Company signed an agreement with PoViva and acquired 51% of PoViva with an initial consideration of $50,000. Lexaria serves as the Manager of Business Operations of PoViva’s Teas. As Manager, Lexaria oversees most aspects2023. The term of the business including, but not limitedlease can be extended for another five years, subject to Accounting, Marketing, Capital Investment, Capital Raising,Sales, Branding, Advertisingcertain terms and Fulfillment. The Founders served until 2015 as Production Managerconditions. We believe our current facilities are suitable and were responsible for all aspects of production, product quality, licensing, testing, and product legality. It is also expected that both parties to this Agreement will assist the other to fulfill their obligations as needed and the cost of business will be borne by revenues earned by the company and general corporate funds. As of October 2017 Lexaria acquired 100% of PoViva for US$70,000, a waiver on certain debts, and a 5%, 20-year royalty on net profits of ViPova TeaTMtea, coffee, and hot chocolate sales. No Lexaria stock or options were issued.

On June 26, 2015, we entered into a definitive agreement with our joint venture partner Enertopia Corp., and Shaxon Enterprises Ltd. to sell our 49% interest in the Burlington Joint Venture and the MMPR application number 10MMPR0610. The Burlington MMPR license application will continue in the application process under new ownership. Pursuant to the agreement, the joint venture received a non-refundable $10,000 deposit and is entitled to receive up to $1,500,000 in milestone payments upon the Burlington facility becoming licensed under the MMPR. All payments made pursuant to the Definitive Agreement would be divided 51% to Enertopia Corp. and 40% to our Company. Notwithstanding the foregoing, we can neither guarantee nor provide a meaningful time estimate regarding the grant of a production licenseadequate for the Burlington facility.Company’s current operational requirements.

29


Item 3. Legal Proceedings

We know of no otherare not party to any material, existingpending or pendingexisting legal proceedings against our company,Company or its subsidiaries nor are we involved as a plaintiff in any other material proceeding or pending litigation. There are no other proceedings in which any of our directors, executive officers, or affiliates, or any registered or beneficial stockholder, is an adverse party or has a material interest adverse to our interest.Lexaria or any of its subsidiaries.

Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures

None.

Not Applicable.

23

Table of Contents

PART II

Item 5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

Our

On January 12, 2021, the Company’s common shares arestock and warrants began trading on the National Association of Securities Dealers Automated Quotations Stock Market (“Nasdaq”) under the trading symbols “LEXX” and “LEXXW”, respectively. Prior to this date the Company’s common stock was quoted on the OTCQBOTCQX under the symbol “LXRP.” Our common shares are alsowere previously quoted on the Canadian Securities Exchange (“CSE”) under the symbol “LXX”. until July 8, 2021.

The following quotations, obtained from Yahoo Finance, reflectstock market in general has experienced extreme stock price fluctuations in the highpast few years. In some cases, these fluctuations have been unrelated to the operating performance of the affected companies. Many companies have experienced dramatic volatility in trading volumes and low bids for ourthe market prices of their common stock. The Company believes that several factors, both within and outside of its’ control, could cause the daily volumes and price of the Company’s common stock to fluctuate. There were 5,950,998 common shares issued and outstanding as quoted on the OTCQB based on inter-dealer prices, without retail mark-up, mark-down or commission and may not represent actual transactions.

The high and low bid prices of our common stock for the periods indicated below are as follows:

OTC Bulletin Board(1)
   
Quarter EndedHighLow
November 30, 2014$0.12$0.04
Feb 28, 2015$0.12$0.07
May 31, 2015$0.225$0.076
August 31, 2015$0.27$0.13
November 30, 2015$0.235$0.111
Feb 28, 2016$0.28$0.08
May 31, 2016$0.169$0.08
August 31, 2016$0.154$0.08
November 30, 2016$0.35$0.11
February 28, 2017$0.699$0.20
May 31, 2017$0.625$0.27
August 31, 2017$0.43$0.27
(1)Over-the-counter market quotations reflect inter-dealer prices without retail mark- up, mark-down or commission, and may not represent actual transactions.

August 31, 2022 (5,726,699 at August 31, 2021). As of November 14, 2017,25, 2022, there were 80 holdersapproximately 44 shareholders of record of our common stock. As of such date, 69,020,011 shares of common stock were issued and outstanding.record.

Our common shares are issued in registered form. Computershare, 2nd Floor, 510 Burrard Street, Vancouver, BC V6C 3B9 (Telephone: 604-661-9400; Facsimile: 604-661-9549) is the transfer agent for our common shares.

Nevada Agency and Trust Company, 50 West Liberty Street, Suite 880, Reno, Nevada 89501 (Telephone: 775.322.0626; Facsimile: 775.322.5623) is our registrar.

30


Dividend Policy

We have notnever declared or paid any cash dividends on our common stock and have no present intention of paying any dividends on the shares of our commoncapital stock. Our current policy is to retain earnings, if any, for use in our operations and in the development of our business. OurAs a result, we anticipate that only appreciation of the price of our common stock, if any, will provide a return to investors for at least the foreseeable future. Any future determination related to dividend policy will be determined from time to time bymade at the discretion of our boardBoard of directors.Directors (“our Board”) and will depend on, among other factors, our results of operations, financial condition, capital requirements, contractual restrictions, business prospects and other factors our Board may deem relevant.

Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities

Other than set out below, we did not sell any equity securities which were not registered under the Securities Act during

During the year ended August 31, 2017 that were not otherwise disclosed on our quarterly reports on Form 10-Q or our current reports on Form 8-K filed during the year ended August 31, 2017.

On October 11, 2016, pursuant to its agreement with Docherty Management Ltd.,2022, the Company issued 252,000224,299 restricted common shares with a value of $35,760.$1.2m as required by a consulting contract.

On October 11, 2016, pursuant to the Advisory Agreement, the Company issued 750,000

Warrants

There were no warrants with an exercise price of $0.14 per share and term of five years, in return for consulting services provided in August, September, and October. The Company recognized the fair value of $32,252 from 250,000 of such warrants for services received during the month of August 2016,granted or exercised during the year ended August 31, 2016, and during the three months ended November 30, 2016, further recognized $59,490 for the remaining 500,000 warrants issued in return for consulting services received during the months of September and October 2016.2022.

The Company reached an agreement with a director to settle the outstanding amount pursuant to an advisory agreement (Note 14), through issuance of common shares of the Company. To settle the outstanding amount of $16,000 for four months to October 31, 2016, the Company issued 114,286 shares of its common stock at a value of $0.14 per share, on October 11, 2016. On February 17, 2017, the Company issued a further 29,091 common shares to settle $16,000 of fees incurred during the four months ended February 28, 2017. A total of $8,000 of the $32,000 was recognized as consulting fees during the year ended August 31, 2016.

On October 27, 2016, the Company issued 56,250 shares of its common stock in settlement of $9,000, recognized within accounts payable and accrued liabilities as at August 31, 2016.

On November 1, 2016, the Company issued 500,000 warrants to a consultant. Each warrant entitles the consultant to purchase one common share of the Company at a price of $0.31 per share with a term expiring on May 31, 2017. The Company recognized $48,313, representing the fair value of such warrants, during the nine months ended May 31, 2017.

During November, 2016, the Company provided to its warrant holders, an incentive for early exercise of their previously held warrants. Upon exercise of each warrant, in addition to the common shares of the Company, the warrant holders received a second warrant with identical terms to purchase one additional common share of the Company. The Company raised $737,508 from this early exercise warrant incentive program. A total of 3,245,000 warrants were exercised at a weighted average exercise price of $0.23 and the Company issued 3,245,000 common shares as well as 3,245,000 additional warrants to purchase common shares with an exercise price of $0.23 per share, expiring on May 14, 2017. The fair value of these additional warrants was determined to be $298,777.

On January 10, 2017, the Company issued 500,000 warrants to a consultant. Each warrant entitles the consultant to purchase one common share of the Company at a price of $0.44 per share with a term expiring on January 9, 2018. The Company recognized $112,725, representing the fair value of such warrants, during the nine months ended May 31, 2017.

On April 3, 2017, the Company closed its brokered private placement of 4,104,280 units at a price per Unit of $0.42 for total gross proceeds of $1,723,798. Each Unit consists of one common share and one-half of one Share purchase warrant. Each whole Warrant entitles the holder to acquire one common share of the Company at a price of $0.60 per Share for a period of 24 months. The Agents received a cash commission of seven percent of the gross proceeds and 287,300 compensation units exercisable for a period of 24 months at an exercise price of $0.42 consisting of one common share and one half share purchase warrant. Each whole compensation warrant is exercisable for one common share at an exercise price of $0.60 for a period of 24 months following closing.

31


On May 31, 2017, the Company reached an agreement with a director to settle the outstanding amount pursuant to a advisory agreement (Note 14), through issuance of common shares of the Company. To settle the outstanding amount of $12,000 to May 31, 2017, the Company issued 35,294 shares of its common stock at a value of $0.34 per share, on May 31, 2017.

On June 22, 2017, pursuant to the agreement with Mr. Chris Bunka (Note 16), the Company issued 210,000 common shares valued at $61,950, for services rendered as the Chief Executive Officer of the Company.

On June 22, 2017, pursuant to the agreement with Mr. John Docherty (Note 16), the Company issued 210,000 common shares valued at $61,950, for services rendered as the President of the Company.

On August 25, 2017, the Company issued 307,500 shares of its common stock for the conversion of the convertible debt of $45,000 plus accrued interest of $1,125 (Note 10).

On August 25, 2017, the Company issued 32,433 shares of its common stock at $0.37 in settlement of $12,000, recognized within accounts payable and accrued liabilities as at August 25, 2017.

Equity Compensation Plan Information

We have no long-term incentive plans other than the stock option plansequity incentive plan described below:below.

2007 Equity Plan

24

Table of Contents

On April 25, 2007, our shareholders approved our 2007 Equity Incentive Stock Option Plan.Plan

The 2007 Plan permits our company to issue up to 550,000 shares of our common stock to eligible employees and directors of our company upon the exercise of stock options granted

Securities authorized for issuance under equity compensation plans

Plan Category

 

Number of securities to be

based upon exercise of

outstanding options,

warrants and rights

 

 

Weighed-average

exercise price of

outstanding options,

warrants and rights

 

 

Number of securities remaining

available for future issuance under

equity compensation plan

[excluding securities reflected in

column (a)]

 

 

 

(a)

 

 

(b)

 

 

(c)

 

Equity compensation plans not approved by shareholders

 

Nil

 

 

Nil

 

 

Nil

 

Equity compensation plans approved by shareholders

 

 

206,170

 

 

 

7.36

 

 

 

304,263

 

Total

 

 

206,170

 

 

 

7.36

 

 

 

304,263

 

All future option issuances shall be made under the 2010Equity Incentive Plan.

2010 Equity Compensation Plan

On February 26, 2010, our shareholders approved and adopted our 2010 equity incentive plan.

The 2010 Plan permits our Company to issue up to 1,980,000 shares of our common stock to directors, officers, employees and eligible consultants of our Company upon exercise of stock options granted under the 2010 plan.

2014 Stock Option Plan

On June 11, 2014, our shareholders approved and adopted our company’s 2014 Stock Option Plan which permits our company to grant up to an aggregate of 3,850,000 options to acquire shares of our common stock, to directors, officers, employees and consultants of our company.

The Our Board may amend, subject to the approval of any regulatory authority whose approval is required, suspend, or terminate this Plan or any portion thereof.thereof subject to the approval of any requisite regulatory authority. No such amendment, suspension or termination shall alter or impair any outstanding unexercised Options or any rights without the consent of such Participant. If this Plan is suspended or terminated, the provisions of this Plan and any administrative guidelines, rules and regulations relating to this Plan shall continue in effect for the duration of such time as any Option remains outstanding.

32



Equity Compensation Plan Information







Plan category



Number of securities
to be issued upon
exercise of
outstanding options,
warrants and rights




Weighted-average
exercise price of
outstanding options,
warrants and rights
Number of securities
remaining available
for future issuance
under equity
compensation plans
(excluding securities
reflected in column
(a))
Equity compensation plans not approved by shareholdersNilNilNil
Equity compensation plans approved by shareholders:      
      2007 Equity 
      compensation plan
NilNil550,000
      2010 Equity 
      compensation plan
247,500$0.091,732,500
      2014 Stock Option Plan 
      approved by security holders
3,073,375$0.15776,625
Total3,320,875$0.153,059,125

Convertible Securities

As of

Pursuant to our Equity Incentive Plan, during the year ended August 31, 2017,2022, we had outstanding options to purchase 3,320,000 shares of our common stock exercisable between prices of $0.09 and $0.37. In December 2015 we experienced a 1.1 for 1.0 forward stock split that adjusted quantities and strike prices of all previously granted options. Those adjustments are reflected herein.

On October 10, 2016, the Company granted 250,000 stock options to a consultant for business advisory services. The exercise price ofdirectors, officers, employees, and consultants that enable the stock options is $0.14 per share, vesting immediately and expiring on October 10, 2018.

On June 2, 2017, the Company granted 200,000 stock optionsoption holders to an officerpurchase 222,000 common shares of the Company. Options were granted at prices of: 81,800 at $6.23, 36,700 at $3.39, and 103,500 at $2.91 and have five year terms. The exercise price198,500 options granted and vested during the year had a fair value of $663,398 using the stock options is $0.37 per share, vesting immediatelyBlack Scholes valuation method and expiring five years from the date of grant.non-cash expense was included in consulting and salaries.

On June 21, 2017, the Company granted 300,000 stock options to a consultant, 100,000 vesting annually for 3 years, with an exercise price of $0.295 and expiring five years from the date of grant. The company also granted 100,000 options to consultants vesting immediately with an exercise price of $0.295 and expiring five years from the date of grant.

Purchases of Equity Securities by the Issuer and Affiliated Purchasers

We did not purchase any of our shares of common stock or other securities during our fiscal year ended August 31, 2017.

Not applicable.

Item 6. Selected Financial Data

As a “smaller reporting company”“Smaller Reporting Company”, we arethis Item and the related disclosure is not required to provide the information required by this Item.required.

33


Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

The following

Overview

This discussion and analysis contain forward-looking statements that involve not only risks and uncertainties but also changes in condition, significance, value and other factors as described in “Risk Factors” and elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Our actual results of operations, performance, financial position and business prospects and opportunities for this fiscal year and the periods that follow could differ materially from those expressed in or implied by forward-looking statements. This discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with our audited consolidated financial statements and the accompanying notes related notesthereto that appear elsewhere in this annual report. Report.

25

Table of Contents

The following management’s discussion contains forward-looking statements that reflectand analysis of financial condition and results of operations (“MD&A”) is provided to enhance the readers understanding of our plans, estimatesresults of operations and beliefs.financial condition for the year ended August 31, 2022, and in comparison, to the year ended August 31, 2021.

Executive Summary

Lexaria’s DehydraTECH patented technology improves the delivery of bioactive compounds while promoting healthy ingestion methods, lowers overall dosing, and is highly effective in active molecule delivery available in a range of formats from oral ingestible to oral buccal/sublingual to topical products. DehydraTECH substantially improves the rapidity and quantity of API transport to the blood plasma and brain using the body’s natural process for distributing fatty acids via the oral route. This technology extends across many categories beyond the primary pharmaceutical focus of the Company from foods and beverages to cosmetic products and nutraceuticals.

Lexaria is advancing several R&D activities in both preclinical and future clinical programs. Our actual results could differ materially from those discussedprimary focus during the year was on our investigations of CBD for the reduction of hypertension. We completed three human studies in the forward looking statements. Factors that could cause or contributeyear on hypertension with final results of our fourth and largest hypertension study to such differences include, but are not limited to; those discussed below and elsewhere in this annual report, particularlydate expected to be released in the section entitled "Risk Factors".second fiscal quarter of 2023.

Our audited financial statements

The FDA provided us with a positive written response from our pre-IND meeting regarding DehydraTECH-CBD for the treatment of hypertension. The FDA confirmed that it has agreed with Lexaria’s proposal to pursue a 505(b)(2) new drug application (“NDA”) regulatory pathway for our program. We continue working toward our IND filing which is anticipated to be in late fiscal 2023 or early 2024. During the year ended August 31, 2022, we also completed studies in NSAIDS, THC, PDE5s and nicotine.

The Company continues to engage in small R&D projects and B2B formulation for third parties who are statedevaluating our technology for use in United States Dollarstheir product. 

Financial condition and operating performance

The data generated from our past and ongoing R&D programs continues to support confirmatory results and are preparedcontributing greatly to our understanding of the workings of DehydraTECH. These findings encourage the pursuit of lucrative commercial applications in accordancethe pharmaceutical sector. We continue to devote an increasing proportion of our resources toward pharmaceutical applications with United States Generally Accepted Accounting Principles.the continuation of our programs directed at hypertension as we move toward FDA approved IND clinical studies.

Plan of Operation

During the next twelve month period (beginning September 1, 2017), we intend to:

Our plans beyond fiscal 2018 are dependent upon our ability to obtain sufficient capital to execute. During the previous year we did raise sufficient capital to fulfill all our plans. Without sufficient capital, our plans will change, and could change materially. We anticipate that we will incur the following operating expenses during this period:

Estimated Funding Required During the 12 Months beginning September 1, 2017

ExpenseAmountEstimated
($)Completion/Due
Date
Research and Development of additional products70,00012 months
Research and Development (General)800,00012 months
Patent applications and trademark250,00012 months
Marketing and Sales200,00012 months
Consulting Fees (~50% is officers and directors)900,00012 months
Professional fees160,00012 months
Rent20,00012 months
Other general administrative expenses (including travel, insurance, conferences, and fees)300,00012 months
Interest Expense10,00012 months
Total2,710,000

34


12 Month Outlook for Current Product Line, Product Development & Design, Patents

As atended August 31, 2017,2022, we hadcompleted ten studies and initiated a workingfurther seven. These programs, having been funded by the capital surplusinfusion of $2,703,148 and cash on handLexaria’s 2021 financing of $2,533,337. We therefore estimate that we will be required to raise approximately $nil in cash to finance$15m,supported our planned expenditures for the 12 months beginning September 1, 2017. In the uncertain event that we are unable to raise sufficient funds to execute our current business plan, orsignificant advancements in the uncertain event that allfields of heart disease and hypertension, oral nicotine, and antiviral research.

We consider the advancement of our debt obligations become due, we will be required to scale backapplied R&D studies as a vital step towards our operations to prioritize immediate and necessary expenses in our longer term planning into fiscal 2019. These necessary expenses include professional fees and general and administrative expenses necessary to satisfy our public reporting requirements.

Our business strategy involves several elements. We intend to prioritize our revenue generating efforts in 2017/18 on technology licensing, with a secondary focus on our consumer food products enriched with full spectrum hemp oil.

Our patented technology was developed to aid absorption and bioavailabilitygoal of certain “payload” molecules, including cannabinoids such as cannabidiol (CBD) and tetrahydrocannabinol (THC). CBD is not psychoactive and may have desirable qualities, and is found in plant species such as hemp, cannabis, and Echinacea. Our technology appears to improve absorption and bioavailability of CBD into human epi-intestinal cells. We are developing a line of food products fortified with full spectrum hemp oil that contains cannabinoids such as CBD, but contains less than 0.3% THC. Because of the low amounts of THC, and because the hemp oil is derived from legally imported hemp, the products are legal under Federal law.

We first began selling trial amounts of ViPova™ branded black tea fortified with hemp oil and utilizing our technology, in January 2015. In August 2015 we added six new flavors of tea to expand the brand’s reach. Sales of these products have been modest but are expected to improve in the long term.

We also began offering our first coffee and hot chocolate also fortified with full spectrum hemp oil, and also under the ViPova™ brand. Together, tea, coffee and hot chocolate comprise all our product offerings under the ViPova™ brand, despite modest changes to flavors or perhaps packaging, etc. Offering a variety of self-made beverages to the consumers helps us to establish the ViPova™ brand and may also help us to developestablishing commercial relationships with retail distributorsindustry partners who are less likely to place orders from manufacturers that can only offer a single product.

Generating meaningful revenue fromutilizes DehydraTECH within existing or new product sales will be challenging and will rely in part on our ability to achieve widespread retail distribution access. We are also investigating the possibility of generating sales from international markets, in those locations where hemp oil fortified foods are permissible by law.

ViPova™ branded products are owned by our 51%-owned Poviva Tea LLC subsidiary. As of October 2017 Lexaria acquired 100% of Poviva Tea LLC.

While the ViPova™ line is focused on a “coffee house” experience, the “Lexaria Energy” line is focused on athletic performance and active lifestyle needs. The first Lexaria Energy product is believed to be unique or nearly so: a protein energy bar utilizing our technology to fortify with full spectrum hemp oil. We first offered the Lexaria Energy Bar for sale in November, 2015.

Lexaria Energy branded products are owned 100% by Lexaria Corp.

A manufacturing facility was contracted to produce the bar in 2015. Recipes have evolved and at the time of this report the Company had no inventories of protein bars to be offered for sales, and was negotiating for a suitable 2016/17 manufacturing facility and prices.

Our strategy was to encourage online sales via a dedicated website, and also to encourage fitness enthusiasts to become aware of the Lexaria Energy Bars at fitness clubs and gyms, which they are likely to frequent. We did pursue traditional grocery store, convenience store, and roadside store distribution channels in 2016 with some success but limited due to our lack of an established distribution system.

35


It is our intention, subject to sufficient funding being available, to provide R&D to develop additional fitness-style products in 2017 under the Lexaria Energy brand, such as protein powders for shakes or smoothies, and protein energy drinks. We are also pursuing other product development and expect to launch new products.

We believe the range of products available and under development are sufficient to prepare for revenue growth and potentially profitable long term operations if we are able to generate sufficient consumer demand and obtain sufficiently widespread retail distribution locations.

Meanwhile our business strategy contains a second element that we believe will be more impactful to future corporate growth that involves the further development and out-licensing of our intellectual property of molecule delivery that enhances bioactivity or absorption.

At this time we are not planning to offer for sale any products containing THC in quantities higher than 0.3% . However we envision licensing our technology to companies legally state-licensed to offer THC products in the states or international jurisdictions where they do business. We also plan to license our technology to other companies for the delivery of molecules other than THC or cannabinoids. Our October 31, 2017 announcement of the USPTO Notice of Allowance of our technology related to new molecule groups may enhance our ability to successfully pursue this initiative during fiscal 2018.

We will attempt to communicate the benefits of our technology to potential licensing partners, i.e. with higher absorption levels a manufacturer could infuse smaller amounts of active molecules into a product, thus reducing their manufacturing input costs. We believe this to a meaningful competitive advantage that may lead to the potential to generate licensing revenue, and will pursue these opportunities within the THC market both within the USA and also internationally, in those locations where it is legal and regulated by government.

We would not ourselves be selling any THC products – we would only be licensing technology to already-licensed participants in valid jurisdictions. We expect a low number of licensees initially and currently have one revenue generating agreement with such a licensee and additional letters of intent and negotiations with other potential licensees.

Subject to budgetary availability, we also plan to conductlines. Conducting additional in vitro and in vivo studies testingwhich test the absorption of some, or all of the molecules named within our patents and patent applications, i.e. CBD, NSAIDs, Vitamins,vitamins, PDE5 inhibitors, nicotine and Nicotine – toanti-viral drugs, further substantiate the effectiveness of our invention. More than simply satisfying scientific curiosity, successfulDehydraTECH. Successful tests could leadare expected to increasedincrease awareness and acceptance of our technologyDehydraTECH as a meaningful method by whichused to deliver some or all of the named molecules more effectively than their current delivery methods. Therefore absorptionmethods avail. Absorption tests could becomeare an important element leading towards higher rates of acceptance and the implementation of our technology licensing initiatives. Our R&D results serve to de-risk the potential API products that could conceivably develop into clinical trials and ultimately new drugs.

Our pursuit of opportunities within the cannabinoid, nicotine and other bioactive molecular markets in the US and internationally continue unabated. We believe there are meaningful competitive advantages in manufacturers adopting DehydraTECH in their product with its demonstrated higher absorption levels, its ability to infuse smaller quantities of active molecules in their products and the benefit of its predictable drug delivery times. Implementing our technology could lead to smaller dosing and decreased manufacturing costs while masking unwanted flavor and smell of the active molecules. We are anticipating these efforts will pursuelead to increased licencing revenue through licensing partnerships. We are pursuing technology licensing opportunities as a method of generating highly profitable revenue streams over long periods of time. In addition, while one of our

With ten US and nine Australian patents granted to date we also have numerous patent applications has been granted byfiled in the USPTOUS and another patent application has generated a Notice of Allowance, our remaining patent applications have not yet been granted.around the world. It is not possible to forecast with certainty when, or if, our remaining patent pendingsapplications will becomebe granted as patents. But if our remaining patent applications do become granted patents, our ability to generate meaningful license revenue from our intellectual property may increase in a very short period of time.

We will continue to pursue our remaining patents pending as vigorously as we are able, since the successful granting of more of those applications could lead to material increases in shareholder value. We are pursuingseek patent protection in more than 40 countries around the world. The successful granting of additional patents could lead to material increases in shareholder value through the ability to generate meaningful license revenues from an increased intellectual property portfolio.

36


Lexaria expects its current cash reserves to meet our operational requirements for the twelve months following the release of this report. The Company is continuing to explore strategic corporate business partnerships for many of its specific drug investigations after sufficient data has been generated which, if successful, could generate any combination of up-front milestone and/or royalty payments to the Company.

26

Table of Contents

Asset Sale

On December 9, 2020, Lexaria CanPharm ULC (“CanPharm”) completed a disposition (the “Disposition”) of its use and licensing rights for DehydraTECH technology (the “Assets”) specifically in association with non-pharmaceutical products containing cannabis molecules that contain 0.3% or greater THC. The purpose of the Disposition was to remove the Company’s association with cannabis as it remains a Schedule 1 Drug and thereby eliminating any such regulatory restrictions cannabis products may create. The Disposition also assisted in obtaining a listing on the Nasdaq on January 12, 2021. As a result of the Disposition, CanPharm assigned to the purchaser, Hill Street Beverage Company Ltd. (“Hill Street”), license agreements with three existing non-related-party licensees.

In consideration for the Assets, Hill Street provided CanPharm with C$350,000 cash, a promissory note bearing a principal amount of C$2,000,000 and bearing an interest rate of 10% (the “Note”) and C$1,500,000 in shares of Hill Street, issuable in three tranches by April 9, 2022. The repayment of the Note does not have a fixed maturity date and is based on quarterly instalments equal to 5% of the gross sales realized by Hill Street of DehydraTECH-enabled products. Due to the uncertainty pertaining to the settlement of the Note, management concluded that the note had $Nil value at the time of the sale and was recorded as such. Some of the factors considered in the $Nil valuation of the Note were that the legal sales of THC products in the US and Canada have little or no history which made the expectant quarterly payments very difficult to forecast. Further, Hill Street had no experience selling THC products and at the time of the sale was not licenced to produce and sell such products. Therefore, the Company considered risk of default high and the collectability of the Note as highly doubtful. Since the date of sale Hill Street has repaid $25,083 of the Note and these amounts are considered other income when received.

Results of Operations for our Year Ended August 31, 2017 and August 31, 20162022

Our net loss and comprehensive lossfrom operations for the year ended August 31, 2017, for the year ended August 31, 2016 and the2022, was $7,391,283 (2021 - $5,686,852). The changes between thosethese periods for the respective items are summarized as follows:

  Year Ended  Year Ended    
  August 31,  August 31,    
  2017  2016  Change 
  $  $  $ 
Revenue 63,639  40,718  22,921 
General and administrative 1,963,354  1,272,352  691,002 
Interest expense 6,015  2,250  3,765 
Consulting fees 1,017,872  565,543  452,329 
Professional Fees 210,297  133,860  76,437 
Net loss (1,929,465) (1,277,249) (652,216)

Revenue

 

 

August 31

 

 

August 31

 

 

 

 

 

 

2022

 

 

2021

 

 

Change

 

 

 

$

 

 

$

 

 

$

 

Revenue

 

 

255,397

 

 

 

722,738

 

 

 

(467,341

)

Research & development

 

 

1,842,675

 

 

 

1,262,895

 

 

 

579,780

 

Consulting fees & employees

 

 

2,244,664

 

 

 

2,627,765

 

 

 

(383,101

)

Legal and professional

 

 

561,265

 

 

 

703,407

 

 

 

142,142

 

General and administrative

 

 

2,918,605

 

 

 

1,640,177

 

 

 

1,278,428

 

Net operating loss

 

 

(7,383,653

)

 

 

(5,686,852

)

 

 

1,696,801

 

LicensingRevenue

Lexaria’s business operations include technology licensing agreements where corporate licensees implement DehydraTECH under license within our contracted facilities under royalty agreements. This includes specific B2B pre-processed DehydraTECH CBD-powders manufactured at a Lexaria contracted GMP-certified food facility for clients to integrate into their final product formats. Fees are derived from a combination of manufacturing charges, royalties and trademark fees.

The primary source of revenues representfor the majorityCompany are derived from Lexaria Hemp where sales of B2B processing of intermediary product saw a significant decrease of approximately 70% (2022 - $113,438 vs 2021- $383,179) in the year and contributed approximately 46% of the $63,639 in revenues during the year ended August 31, 2017. Consumer product sales revenues were lower due to challenges in securing expansive distribution opportunities, production challenges and payment processing changes. Total licensing revenues increased as they were included on a pro-rated basis and also included additional contracted fees. Licensing revenues were recognized on a pro-rated basis over the term of the licensing agreement as the Company is required to provide additional support services during the term and is in a very early stage of this revenue cycle to identify a vendor-specific objective evidence of fair value of such services. Additional contracted fees were included as earned. As of August 31 2017 the company had received all of the pre-defined Licensing payments to August 31 2017 for a cash receipts of $50,000 of Licensing fees and $20,392 of additional fees corresponding to the areas under the license agreement where the licensee has been active to-date.2022 annual revenues. During the year ended August 31, 2017, $25,417 of the $50,000 was included (2016 $7,500) on a pro-rated basis and $20,392 (2016 $NIL) of additional fees as licensing revenue for a total of $45,809 in licensing revenue and $17,830 in product and other revenues.

As fiscal 2017 came to a close, hemp oil fortified foods, and hemp seed products continued gaining consumer acceptance and provide a reason to believe that sales could increase. Those trends should support higher potential consumer product sales. Release of the TurboCBD product was successful but sales were limited by changes to payment processing services outside of the Company’s control. At the time of this report2022, the Company had extinguished its supplies of certain products like protein bars and the lack of inventory was also a negative impact on consumer product sales potential.generated $54,560 (2021- $86,921) from R&D contracts.

For 2018

In fiscal 2023 the Company expects to derive ever larger proportions of its revenues fromsee an increase in revenue through further technology licensing to third parties. At August 31, 2015 the Company had zero technology licensing agreements entered. By August 31, 2016 we had entered several LOI’s or definitive agreements related to technology out-licensing. At the timefrom DehydraTECH processed hemp-based CBD consumer products. The anticipated expansion of this report the Company has entered more than 10 formal letters of intent or definitive agreements and is negotiating more. The Company also has formed a joint venture to develop, produce, and sell a line of healthy edible cannabinoid products using our patented technology. It is the Company’s view that the October 2017 notice of allowance of its expanding patent portfolio will be a positive step in enabling the generation of more significant revenues during 2018.

We do not expect that all of the Letters of Intent into which we enter will result in definitive agreements with paying customers and cannot predict how many will. We believe that strengthening and expanding our intellectual property portfolio and conducting supportive R&D will jointly contribute to strengthening revenue prospects.prospects as we continue to explore new applications for our technology.

In prior years, Lexaria developed a line of demonstration oral-delivered products that were utilized to show the efficacy of DehydraTECH and enabled the ability of manufacturers to incorporate the technology into their product lines. We had offered these products for sale to consumers through our web-based sales platform. During the year-ended August 31, 2021, we discontinued these direct-to-consumer demonstration products and closed our web sales platform in order to intensify our efforts on B2B production.

27

Table of Contents

Research and Development

Research and development costs are expensed as incurred and account for a significant portion of our operational expenses. With proceeds from our underwritten public offering in January of 2021, we were able to direct additional expenditures to the increased focus on studies pertaining to hypertension and anti-viral drugs. We will continue to invest in our R&D programs for the foreseeable future and we expect these expenses to continue to increase in 2023 compared to 2022. Our R&D programs are focused on three core business segments; heart disease including hypertension, reduced-risk non-combusted nicotine and CBD from hemp. With the data collected during the fiscal year 2022 management has concluded that our studies related to the improvement of antiviral drug delivery using DehydraTECH indicate that the economics are not attractive enough to further pursue this segment at this time.

Of significant note, Lexaria submitted our preliminary application for an Investigational New Drug (“IND”) to the FDA with plans to develop a cannabidiol-based drug formulation, DehydraTECH-CBD for hypertension. We received a written response following our pre-IND meeting in August 2022 where the agency has agreed with the Company’s plans to pursue a faster 505(b)(2) new drug application regulatory pathway for the program. The 505(b)(2) pathway permits a faster commercial approval than the traditional 505(b)(1) NDA pathway. The FDA has agreed with the Company’s proposed clinical protocol for DehydraTECH-CBD, which is designed to target 100 patients with hypertension. The regulator has also decided that there was no need to conduct additional non-clinical studies before the start of the IND program. We expect to file our IND application in late fiscal 2023. Preclinical and clinical development is inherently unpredictable as is regulatory approval and commercialization, therefore we are unable to estimate with any certainty the costs we will incur and the timelines required in our continued development and commercialization efforts. Any successful development and completion of clinical trials as well as regulatory approval and commercialization are uncertain and may not result in approved products. Completion dates and completion costs can vary significantly for each future product candidate and are difficult to predict. Lexaria and our commercial partners will continue to explore multiple R&D programs directed toward further evaluation, development, and commercialization of our DehydraTECH technology.

General and Administrative

General and administrative expenses consist primarily of consulting fees, executive and employee salaries, the recording of non-cash expenses through stock-based compensation for options vesting in the year and unrealized gains/losses on marketable securities. Also included are costs for advertising and marketing, investor relations, corporate facilities, insurance premiums, legal fees related to corporate matters, fees for auditing, and tax filings.

Our general and administrative expenses increased by $691,002saw an overall increase of $753,185 during the year ended August 31, 2017. The increase2022, from $4,971,349 recorded in the previous year. We increased advertising and promotional expenditures by $752,097 in our general and administrative expenses was largely duecontinued efforts to expected increases in executing budgeted work. Examples are many and include additional consultants; increasing legal fees for patent and trademark filings, new product development and launch, and more. However roughly two-thirdsbring the results of the increase includedCompany’s R&D programs to the attention of various industry sectors and to the scientific and investment communities. Stock-based compensation increased by $365,873 in the G&A totalcurrent fiscal year as result of options vested during the year. Travel expenses were up by $49,105 in the year as covid restrictions were less of a barrier and we returned to near pre-pandemic excursion levels.

Unrealized losses on marketable securities increased by $598,359 in the year. This is $258,406 valuationattributable to shares received as a part of warrants issued for services and $207,660the sale of share issuance for contracts andassets to Hill Street Beverage Company in settlement of services recognized in accounts payable regarding contractors. Significant increases are expectedthe year 2021. The loss during fiscal 2018 executing2022 on these securities was exacerbated by receipt of shares in the budgeted scientific testingyear that were valued according to the contract of sale and researchnot at market value. We remain confident that the loss is likely temporary in nature as Hill Street continues to make inroads to the US hemp markets with DehydraTECH enabled products produced and development.sold by their licensees.

37


Interest Expense

Interest expense forOur consulting fees and salaries decreased by $383,118 in the year ended August 31, 2017 was $6,015 (2016 $2,250). The increase was primarily due to the issuance of a convertible debt2022. Legal and related payments. As ofprofessional fees were $140,142 lower in the year ended August 31, 20172022 as compared to the previous years expenses that included the additional fees related to our Nasdaq listing. In the previous year we eliminated our long-term loan and the convertible debt was converted.

Consulting fees

Our consulting fees increased duringrecorded bad debts of $50,500 with no bad debts recorded in the year ended August 31, 2017 due2022.

Corporate general and administrative expenses are expected to the involvement of additional consultants, including the appointment of our interim CFO. Our executives are typically hired and compensatedincrease moderately in fiscal 2023 as consultants and costs associated with those agreements comprise the largest majority of our consulting fees expense.

Professional Fees

Our professional fees increased by $76,437 during fiscal 2017 primarily duecompared to increases in patent and trademark filings, but were offset by some reductions due to the appointment of our interim CFO reducing financial report preparation fees from third party service providers. These efficiencies reduced outside professional fees.

Liquidity and Financial Condition

  August 31  August 31 
Working Capital 2017  2016 
  $  $ 
Current assets 2,795,495  510,166 
Current liabilities 92,347  433,881 
Working capital balance 2,703,148  76,285 

The Company’s working capital balance increased during the year ended August 31, 20172022 as a result of its financing activities. The warrant conversions from previous equity financings,higher human resource, regulatory, legal and investor relations costs and the new equity financings duringpotential impact of inflation.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

We have incurred net losses of approximately $7.4m and $4.2m respectively in the past two fiscal 2017 resultedyears. We expect to continue to incur significant operational expenses and net losses in a significant improvementthe upcoming 12 months and beyond. Our net losses may fluctuate significantly from quarter to quarter and year to year, depending on the stage and complexity of our R&D studies and related expenditures, the receipt of additional payments on the licencing of our technology, if any, and the receipt of payments under any current or future collaborations we may enter into.

28

Table of Contents

Since Lexaria’s entry into the bioscience sector in our working capital position of $2,626,863 compared2015 and through to the year earlier period.

     Year Ended 
  August 31  August 31 
Cash flows 2017  2016 
  $  $ 
Cash flows (used in) provided by operating activities (1,545,909) (660,856)
Cash flows (used in) provided by investing activities (9,699) (20,102)
Cash flows (used in) provided by financing activities 3,995,536  514,292 
Increase (decrease) in cash 2,439,928  (166,666)

Operating Activities

Net cash used in operating activities was $1,545,909 for the year ended August 31, 2017 compared2022, we have accumulated a $39.1m deficit despite generating total gross revenues of $2.1m. We have used the issuance of common shares to raise the majority of capital required to fund our business operations. Since fiscal 2014, we have raised an aggregate of $25.3m, of which $16.1m was from the sale of our common stock, $8.8m from warrants and $0.4m from the exercise of stock options.

As the Company continues with our IND application process and progresses into the clinical development of our initial product candidate, the need for substantial capital resources increases. Our existing cash usedwill not be sufficient to complete the full development, testing and commercialization of an FDA approved product candidate. Accordingly, we will be required to obtain further funding to achieve this business objective.

On August 12, 2022, we entered into a sales agreement with Maxim Group LLC, (“Maxim”), pursuant to which we may offer and sell shares of our common stock with an aggregate offering price of up to $5,925,000 under the At-The-Market (“ATM”) Offering. The sales agreement provides that Maxim will be entitled to a sales commission equal to 3.0% of the gross sales price per share of all shares sold under the ATM Offering. As of November 25, 2022 we have not sold any shares under the ATM Offering.

We may also offer securities in operating activitiesresponse to market conditions or other circumstances if we believe such a plan of $660,856 during the same period in 2016. This difference was largely duefinancing is required to the increased costs pertaining to consulting, advertising and promotion, patent and trademark related filings, research and development, and travel.

Investing Activities

Net cash used in investing activities was $9,699 (2016 $20,102) for the year ended August 31, 2017 is primarily due toadvance the Company’s cost incurred related to its patent related applications.

38


Financing Activities

Net cash provided from financing activities was $3,995,536 during the year ended August 31, 2017 compared to net cash provided of $514,292 during the same period in 2016. During fiscal 2017, the Company closed a brokered private placement and had significant warrant exercises. The Company also repaid its loan due to our Chief Executive Officer. We raised $1,635,242 from equity private placements $177,262 from option and $2,233,032 from warrant exercises in fiscal 2017 compared to $419,292 of equity from private placements and $95,000 in debt during fiscal 2016.

Contractual Obligations

As a “smaller reporting company”, we are not required to provide tabular disclosure obligations.

Going Concern

The Company’s consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (U.S. GAAP) applicable to a going concern, which contemplates the realization of assets and the satisfaction of liabilities and commitments in the normal course of business. The Company has a net loss attributable to its common shareholders of $1,869,277 for the year ended August 31, 2017 (2016: $1,214,773) and at August 31, 2017 had a deficit accumulated since its inception of $13,169,939 (2016: $11,300,662). The Company has a working capital balance of $2,703,148 as at August 31, 2017 (2016: $76,285). The Company requires additional funds to maintain its operations and developments beyond fiscal 2018. Management’s plans in this regard are to raise equity and debt financing as required, but therebusiness plans. There is no certainty that suchfuture equity or debt financing will be available or that it will be available at acceptable terms. Theterms and the outcome of these matters cannot be predicted at this time.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

We have no off-balance sheet arrangements that haveis unpredictable. A lack of adequate funding may force us to reduce spending, curtail or are reasonably likely to have a currentsuspend planned programs or future effect onpossibly liquidate assets. Any of these actions could adversely and materially affect our business, cash flow, financial condition, changes in financial condition, revenues or expenses, results of operations, liquidity,and potential prospects. The sale of additional equity may result in additional dilution to our stockholders. Entering into additional licencing agreements, collaborations, partnerships, alliances marketing, distribution, or licensing arrangements with third parties to increase our capital resources is also possible. If we do so we may have to relinquish valuable rights to our technologies, future revenue streams, research programs or product candidates or grant licenses on terms that may not be favorable to us.

The Company has evaluated whether there are conditions or events, considered in the aggregate, that raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. As of August 31, 2022, the Company had cash on hand of approximately $5.8m to settle $200,000 current liabilities. The Company believes this is sufficient to fund our expected R&D and operating expenditures for twelve months proceeding the date of filing this report. We do not anticipate making any material capital expenditures orin the fiscal 2023 as we believe our current facilities and equipment are sufficient for the forthcoming twelve months proceeding the date of filing this report.

 

 

August 31

 

 

August 31

 

Working Capital

 

2022

 

 

2021

 

 

 

$

 

 

$

 

Current assets

 

 

6,977,516

 

 

 

12,442,940

 

Current liabilities

 

 

(194,036

)

 

 

(153,276)

Net Working Capital

 

 

6,775,853

 

 

 

12,289,664

 

The Company’s working capital resources that are materialbalance decreased by approximately $5.5m due to stockholders.the lack of financing activities and lower revenue contributions to cash during the year ended August 31, 2022.

Cash Flows

 

August 31

 

 

August 31

 

 

 

2021

 

 

2021

 

 

 

$

 

 

$

 

Cash flows (used in) provided by operating activities

 

 

(4,879,339

)

 

 

(3,997,590)

Cash flows (used in) provided by investing activities

 

 

(180,640

)

 

 

193,880

 

Cash flows (used in) provided by financing activities

 

 

(44,600

)

 

 

13,427,758

 

Cash flows (used in) provided by discontinued operations

 

 

-

 

 

 

3,000

 

Increase (decrease) in cash

 

 

(5,104,579)

 

 

9,624,048

 

Operating Activities

Net cash used in operating activities was approximately $4.9m for the year ended August 31, 2022, compared with $4.0m during the same period in 2021. The increase in cash used in operating activities during fiscal 2022 was primarily driven by increased research and development programs, slight increases in office and administrative expenditures and significantly lower revenue.

Investing Activities

Net cash used in investing activities is attributable to increased spending on our intellectual property. During the year, four additional patents were granted.

29

Table of Contents

Financing Activities

Net cash used in financing activities reflects payments made on the lease of our facilities.

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

The discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations are based upon our consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordanceconformity with the accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.US GAAP. Preparing consolidated financial statements requires management to make estimates, judgements and assumptions that affect the application of accounting policies and the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenue, and expenses. TheseActual results may differ from these estimates.

Information about critical judgments in applying the accounting policies that have the most significant effect on the amounts recognized in the consolidated financial statements is discussed below. Further details of the nature of these judgments, estimates and assumptions are affected by management’s application of accounting policies. We believe that understandingmay be found in the basis and nature of the estimates and assumptions involved with the aspects of our financial statements are critical to an understanding of our financial statements as more particularly described in Note 3 to our audited annual consolidated financial statements included herein.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In May 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (the “FASB”) issued a new standard relatedrelevant notes to the revenue recognition. Under the new standard, recognition of revenue occurs when a customer obtains control of promised goods or services in an amount that reflects the consideration which the entity expects to receive in exchange for those goods or services. In addition, the standard requires disclosure of the nature, amount, timing, and uncertainty of revenue and cash flows arising from contracts with customers. The FASB has recently issued several amendments to the standards, including clarification on the accounting for licenses of intellectual property and identifying performance obligations.

The guidance permits two methods of adoption: retrospectively to each prior reporting period presented (full retrospective method), or retrospectively with the cumulative effect of initially applying the guidance recognized at the date of initial application (the cumulative catch-up transition method). The Company will apply the full retrospective approach to adopt the standard but does not anticipate that this standard will have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.

39


In July 2015,Stock-based compensation

We account for our stock-based compensation awards in accordance with the FASB issued ASU 2015-11, SimplifyingASC Topic 718, Compensation—Stock Compensation (“ASC 718”). This requires all stock-based payments to employees, including grants of employee stock options and modifications to existing agreements to be recognized in the Measurement of Inventory (“ASU 2015-11”). ASU 2015-11 requires that an entity measure inventory at the lower of cost and net realizable value. This ASU does not apply to inventory measured using last-in, first-out methodology. ASU 2015-11 is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016, including interim periods within that reporting period. The Company does not expect the new standard to have a significant impact on its consolidated financial position, resultsstatements of operations or cash flows.

In November 2015,and comprehensive loss based on their fair values. We use the FASB issued guidance that requires companiesBlack-Scholes option-pricing model to classify all deferred tax assets or liabilities as noncurrent ondetermine the balance sheet rather than separately disclosing deferred taxes as current and noncurrent. This standard is effective for the Company beginning on September 1, 2017 and can be applied either prospectively or retrospectively to all periods presented upon adoption. The standard is not expected to have any impact on the Company’s financial statements.

In January 2016, FASB issued a new standard to amend certain aspects of recognition, measurement, presentation, and disclosure of financial instruments. Most prominent among the amendments is the requirement for changes in fair value of equity investments, with certain exceptions,options granted.

Compensation expense related to beour stock-based awards to employees, executives, directors and consultants have service-based vesting conditions and are recognized through profit or loss rather than other comprehensive income. The new standard will be effective for the Company beginning September 1, 2018. The standard is not expected to have any impact on the Company’s financial statements.

In February 2016 FASB issued ASU No. 2016-02, Leases (Topic 842) which supersedes FASB ASC Topic 840, Leases (Topic 840) and provides principles for the recognition, measurement, presentation, and disclosure of leases for both lessees and the lessors. The new standard requires the lessees to apply a dual approach, classifying leases as either finance or operating leases based on the principle of whether or not the lease is effectively a financed purchase by the lessee. The classification will determine whether lease expense is recognized based on an effective interest method or on a straight-line basis based on the grant date fair value over the termassociated service period of the lease, respectively. A lesseeaward, generally the vesting term. The vesting terms of each grant is also required to recorddetermined by our Board and typically have a right-of-use asset5-year contractual term.

The fair value estimation of options requires the input of subjective assumptions, including expected life of the option, stock price volatility, the risk-free interest rate, and a lease liability for all leases with a term of greater than twelve months regardless of classification. Leases with a term of twelve monthsexpected dividends. The assumptions used in our Black-Scholes option-pricing model represent our best estimates involving numerous variables, uncertainties, assumptions, and the application judgment. They are inherently subjective. If any assumptions change, our stock-based compensation expense could be materially different in the future.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

We have no off-balance sheet arrangements that have or less will be accounted for similar to existing guidance for operating leases. The standard is effective for annual and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2018, with early adoption permitted upon issuance. When adopted, the Company does not expect this guidanceare reasonably likely to have a current or future material impacteffect on its consolidatedour financial statements.condition, changes in financial condition, revenues or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources.

In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-09, Compensation-Stock Compensation (Topic 718), Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting. Under ASU 2016-09, companies will no longer record excess tax benefits and certain tax deficiencies in additional paid in capital (“APIC”). Instead, they will record all excess tax benefits and tax deficiencies as income tax expense or benefit in the income statement and the APIC pools will be eliminated. In addition, ASU 2016-09 eliminates the requirement that excess tax benefits be realized before companies can recognize them. ASU 2016-09 also requires companies to present excess tax benefits as an operating activity on the statement of cash flows rather than as a financing activity. Furthermore, ASU 2016-09 will increase the amount an employer can withhold to cover income taxes on awards and still qualify for the exception to liability classification for shares used to satisfy the employer’s statutory income tax withholding obligation. An employer with a statutory income tax withholding obligation will now be allowed to withhold shares with the fair value up to the amount of taxes owed using the maximum statutory rate in the employee’s applicable jurisdiction(s). ASU 2016-09 requires a company to classify the cash paid to a tax authority when shares are withheld to satisfy its statutory income tax withholding obligation as a financing activity on the statement of cash flows. Under current U.S. GAAP, it is not specified how these cash flows should be classified. In addition, companies will now have to elect whether to account for forfeitures on share-based payments by (1) recognizing forfeiture awards as they occur or (2) estimating the number of awards expected to be forfeited and adjusting the estimate when it is likely to change, as in currently required. The amendments of this ASU are effective for reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016, with early adoption permitted but all of the guidance must be adopted in the same period. The Company is currently assessing the impact the standard will have on its consolidated financial statements.

In June 2016, the FASB issued a new standard to replace the incurred loss impairment methodology in current U.S. GAAP with a methodology that reflects expected credit losses and requires consideration of a broader range of reasonable and supportable information to inform credit loss credit loss estimates. For trade and other receivables, loans and other financial instruments, the Company will be required to use a forward-looking expected loss model rather than the incurred loss model for recognizing credit losses which reflects losses that are probable. Credit losses relating to available for sale debt securities will also be recorded through an allowance for credit losses rather than as a reduction in the amortized cost basis of the securities. The new standard will be effective for Lexaria beginning September 1, 2020, with early adoption permitted. Application of the amendments is through a cumulative-effect adjustment to deficit as of the effective date. The Company is currently assessing the impact of the standard on its consolidated financial statements.

40


Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

As a “smaller reporting company”“Smaller Reporting Company”, we arethis Item and the related disclosure is not required to provide the information required by this Item.required.

Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

41



30

Table of Contents

 

lxrp_10kimg2.jpg

 

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

 

To the Shareholders and Directors of

Lexaria Bioscience Corp.


Opinion on the Consolidated Financial Statements

   

We have audited the accompanying consolidated financial statementsbalance sheets of Lexaria Bioscience Corp. (the “Company”), which comprise the consolidated balance sheets as of August 31, 20172022 and 2016,2021, and the related consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive loss, changes in stockholders’ equity, and cash flows and stockholders’ equity for the years ended August 31, 20172022 and 2016. 2021, and the related notes (collectively referred to as the “financial statements”).  In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Lexaria Bioscience Corp. as of August 31, 2022 and 2021, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the years ended August 31, 2022 and 2021 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

Basis for Opinion

These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on thesethe Company’s consolidated financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (“PCAOB”) and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States).PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement. Anmisstatement, whether due to error or fraud. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit includesof its internal control over financial reporting. As part of our audits we are required to obtain an understanding of internal control over financial reporting but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion.

Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatements of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence supportingregarding the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements. An auditOur audits also includes assessingincluded evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the consolidated financial statement presentation.statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In

Critical Audit Matters

The critical audit matters communicated below are matters arising from the current period audit of the financial statements that were communicated or required to be communicated to the audit committee and that: (1) relate to accounts or disclosures that are material to the financial statements and (2) involved our especially challenging, subjective, or complex judgments. The communication of critical audit matters does not alter in any way our opinion on the consolidated financial statements, referredtaken as a whole, and we are not, by communicating the critical audit matters below, providing separate opinions on the critical audit matters or on the accounts or disclosures to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Lexaria Bioscience Corp. as of August 31, 2017 and 2016, and the results of its operations and its cash flowswhich they relate.

We have not identified any critical audit matters for the years ended August 31, 20172022 and 2016 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in2021.

We have served as the United States of America.Company’s auditor since 2016.

/s/ DAVIDSON & COMPANY LLP”LLP

Vancouver, Canada 

Chartered Professional Accountants

November 25, 2022

PCAOB ID - 731

lxrp_10kimg3.jpg

 
31
Vancouver, Canada                           Chartered Professional Accountants

Table of Contents
November 22, 2017


LEXARIA BIOSCIENCE CORP.

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
SHEET

(Expressed in U.S. Dollars)

  August 31  August 31 
  2017  2016 
       
ASSETS      
       
Current      
       
     Cash$ 2,533,337 $ 93,409 
       
     Accounts and other receivable (Note 6) 45,293  131,083 
       
     Inventory (Note 7) 67,174  134,724 
       
     Prepaid expenses and deposit 149,691  150,950 
  2,795,495  510,166 
     Patent (Note 8) 62,827  53,997 
       
     Equipment 1,856  2,475 
  64,683  56,472 
TOTAL ASSETS$ 2,860,178 $ 566,638 
       
LIABILITIES      
       
Current      
       
     Accounts payable and accrued liabilities$ 32,574 $ 90,010 
     Unearned revenue (Note 9) 17,083  12,500 
     Due to related parties (Note 14) 42,690  331,371 
       
Total Current Liabilities 92,347  433,881 
       
Convertible debenture (Note 10) -  45,000 
       
TOTAL LIABILITIES 92,347  478,881 
       
STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY      
       
Share Capital (Note 11)      
       

     Authorized: 
     220,000,000 common voting shares with a par value of $0.001 per share 
     Issued and outstanding: 67,975,761 common shares at August 31, 2017 
     and 51,288,477 common shares at August 31, 2016

 67,976  51,288 
       
Additional paid-in capital (Note 11) 16,108,270  11,515,419 
       
Deficit (13,169,939) (11,300,662)
       
Equity attributable to shareholders of the Company 3,006,307  266,045 
       
Non-Controlling Interest (Note 8) (238,476) (178,288)
       
Total Stockholders' Equity 2,767,831  87,757 
       
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY$ 2,860,178 $ 566,638 

The accompanying notes are an integral party of these consolidated financial statements.

43


 

 

August 31

 

 

August 31

 

 

 

2022

 

 

2021

 

ASSETS

 

 

 

 

 

 

Current

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash

 

$5,813,218

 

 

$10,917,797

 

Marketable securities

 

 

347,335

 

 

 

833,841

 

Accounts receivable

 

 

201,784

 

 

 

342,401

 

Inventory

 

 

38,418

 

 

 

29,648

 

Prepaid expenses and deposit

 

 

576,761

 

 

 

319,253

 

Total Current Assets

 

 

6,977,516

 

 

 

12,442,940

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Non-current assets, net

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Right-of-use assets

 

 

52,444

 

 

 

91,041

 

Intellectual property

 

 

488,462

 

 

 

364,623

 

Property and equipment

 

 

315,505

 

 

 

368,213

 

Total Non-current Assets

 

 

856,411

 

 

 

823,877

 

TOTAL ASSETS

 

$7,833,927

 

 

$13,266,817

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

LIABILITIES

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Current

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Accounts payable and accrued liabilities

 

$151,449

 

 

$105,496

 

Loan payable

 

 

-

 

 

 

7,926

 

Lease liabilities

 

 

42,587

 

 

 

39,404

 

Total Current Liabilities

 

 

194,036

 

 

 

153,276

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Long Term

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Lease liabilities - long term

 

 

7,401

 

 

 

49,989

 

Total Long Term Liabilities

 

 

7,401

 

 

 

49,989

 

TOTAL LIABILITIES

 

 

201,437

 

 

 

203,265

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Share capital

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Authorized:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

220,000,000 common voting shares with a par value of $0.001 per share Issued and outstanding: 5,950,998 common shares at August 31, 2022 and 5,726,699 common shares at August 31, 2021

 

 

5,951

 

 

 

5,727

 

Additional paid-in capital

 

 

47,041,481

 

 

 

45,089,114

 

Deficit

 

 

(39,098,528)

 

 

(31,829,204)

Equity attributable to shareholders of the Company

 

 

7,948,904

 

 

 

13,265,637

 

Non-Controlling Interest

 

 

(316,414)

 

 

(202,085)

Total Stockholders’ Equity

 

 

7,632,490

 

 

 

13,063,552

 

TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

 

$7,833,927

 

 

$13,266,817

 

LEXARIA BIOSCIENCE CORP.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND COMPREHENSIVE LOSS
(Expressed in U.S. Dollars, except number of shares)

  YEAR ENDED 
  August 31  August 31 
  2017  2016 
Revenue      
         Sales (Note 13)$ 63,639 $ 40,718 
Cost of Goods Sold      
         Cost of goods sold 29,750  45,615 
Gross Profit / (Loss) 33,889  (4,897)
       
Expenses      
         Accounting and audit 74,087  95,921 
         Depreciation and Amortization (Note 8) 1,488  619 
         Insurance 19,652  17,237 
         Advertising and promotions 209,034  185,459 
         Bank charges and exchange loss (6,415) 15,382 
         Consulting (Note 12, 16) 1,130,916  657,813 
         Interest expense (Note 10) 6,015  2,250 
         Investor relations (Note 12) 91,681  61,574 
         Legal and professional 136,210  37,939 
         Office and miscellaneous 118,863  97,077 
         Research and development 54,185  9,024 
         Taxes (2,374) 3,983 
         Travel 61,401  44,034 
         Inventory write-off (Note 7) 68,611  44,040 
  1,963,354  1,272,352 
Net loss and comprehensive loss for the year$ (1,929,465)$ (1,277,249)
Net loss and comprehensive loss attributable to:      
         Common shareholders$ (1,869,277)$ (1,214,773)
         Non-controlling interest (Note 8)$ (60,188)$ (62,476)
       
Basic and diluted loss per share$ (0.03)$ (0.03)
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding- Basic and diluted 58,765,806  43,840,378 

The accompanying notes are an integral party of these consolidated financial statements.

44


LEXARIA BIOSCIENCE CORP.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Expressed in U.S. Dollars)

  YEAR ENDED 
  August 31  August 31 
  2017  2016 
Cash flows used in operating activities      
     Net loss and comprehensive loss for the year$ (1,929,465)$ (1,277,249)
     Adjustments to reconcile net loss and comprehensive loss to net cash used in operating activities:    
           Stock based compensation 113,044  122,015 
           Depreciation and amortization 1,488  619 
           Inventory write-off 68,611  44,040 
           Common shares issued for interest (Note 10) 1,125  - 
           Common shares issued for services 207,660  79,500 
           Warrants issued for services 292,750  32,252 
     Change in working capital:      
           Accounts and other receivable (7,710) (6,201)
           Inventory (1,061) (10,778)
           Prepaid expenses and deposit (17,817) 26,190 
           Accounts payable and accrued liabilities (40,436) 56,937 
           Due to related parties (238,681) 259,319 
           Unearned revenue 4,583  12,500 
Net cash used in operating activities (1,545,909) (660,856)
       
Cash flows used in investing activities      
     Patent (9,699) (17,008)
     Acquisition of equipment -  (3,094)
Net cash used in investing activities (9,699) (20,102)
       
Cash flows from financing activities      
     Proceeds from (Payments of) loans/convertible debentures (50,000) 95,000 
     Proceeds from issuance of equity 4,045,536  419,292 
Net cash from financing activities 3,995,536  514,292 
       
Change in cash 2,439,928  (166,666)
Cash, beginning of year 93,409  260,075 
Cash, end of year$ 2,533,337 $ 93,409 
Supplemental information of cash flows:      
     Interest paid in cash$ 4,890 $ 2,250 
     Income taxes paid in cash$ - $ - 
     Shares issued to convert convertible debt$ 45,000 $ - 
     Subscription funds receivable$ - $ 93,500 
     Stock based compensation recognized from prepaid expense$ 19,076 $ 38,150 
     Shares issued for services in accounts payable and accrued liabilities$ 17,000 $ - 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

45


32

Table of Contents

LEXARIABIOSCIENCECORP.

CONSOLIDATEDSTATEMENTS OFSTOCKHOLDERS'EQUITY
OPERATIONS AND COMPREHENSIVE LOSS

(Expressed in U.S.Dollars)
Dollars except number of shares)

  COMMON STOCK             
        ADDITIONAL          
        PAID-IN        TOTAL 
  SHARES  AMOUNT  CAPITAL  DEFICIT  NCI  EQUITY 
     $  $  $  $  $ 
Balance, August 31, 2015 43,838,286  43,838  10,814,460  (10,085,889) (115,812) 656,597 
Shares issued for services 625,000  625  78,875  -  -  79,500 
Non-controlling Interest -  -  -  -  (62,476) (62,476)
Stock based compensation (Note 12) -  -  83,865  -  -  83,865 
Private placement of shares, net of issuance cost 5,266,858  5,267  414,025  -  -  419,292 
Private placement subscription receivable 1,558,333  1,558  91,942  -  -  93,500 
Warrants to be issued for services -  -  32,252  -  -  32,252 
Net loss -  -  -  (1,214,773) -  (1,214,773)
Balance, August 31, 2016 51,288,477  51,288  11,515,419  (11,300,662) (178,288) 87,757 
Shares issued for services 939,354  938  223,722  -  -  224,660 
Non-controlling Interest -  -  -  -  (60,188) (60,188)
Stock based compensation (Note 12) -  -  93,968  -  -  93,968 
Private placement of shares, net of issuance cost 4,104,280  4,105  1,537,637  -  -  1,541,742 
Warrants issued for services -  -  292,750  -  -  292,750 
Exercise of stock options 1,014,125  1,015  176,247  -  -  177,262 
Exercise of warrants 10,322,025  10,322  2,222,710  -  -  2,233,032 
Conversion of debt 307,500  308  45,817  -  -  46,125 
Net loss -  -  -  (1,869,277) -  (1,869,277)
Balance, August 31, 2017 67,975,761  67,976  16,108,270  (13,169,939) (238,476) 2,767,831 

 

 

August 31

 

 

August 31

 

 

 

2022

 

 

2021

 

Revenue

 

$255,397

 

 

$722,738

 

Cost of goods sold

 

 

71,841

 

 

 

175,346

 

Gross profit

 

 

183,556

 

 

 

547,392

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Operating Expenses

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Research and development

 

 

1,842,675

 

 

 

1,262,895

 

General and administrative

 

 

5,724,534

 

 

 

4,971,349

 

Total operating expenses

 

 

7,567,209

 

 

 

6,234,244

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Loss from operations

 

 

(7,383,653)

 

 

(5,686,852)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Gain on disposal of assets

 

 

-

 

 

 

1,522,704

 

Discontinued operations

 

 

-

 

 

 

(22,000)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net loss and comprehensive loss for the year

 

$(7,383,653)

 

$(4,186,148)

Net loss and comprehensive loss attributable to:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Common shareholders

 

$(7,269,324)

 

$(4,027,006)

Non-controlling interest

 

$(114,329)

 

$(159,142)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Basic and diluted loss per share

 

$(1.24)

 

$(0.95)

Basic and diluted earnings (loss) per share from discontinued operations

 

$-

 

 

$(0.01)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Weighted average number of common shares outstanding

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

- Basic and diluted

 

 

5,885,245

 

 

 

4,391,446

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

46



33

Table of Contents

LEXARIA BIOSCIENCE CORP.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS

(Expressed in U.S. Dollars)

 

 

August 31

 

 

August 31

 

 

 

2022

 

 

2021

 

Cash flows used in operating activities

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net loss and comprehensive loss

 

$(7,383,653)

 

$(4,186,148)

Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Stock based compensation

 

 

752,591

 

 

 

410,007

 

Depreciation and amortization

 

 

102,718

 

 

 

111,718

 

Inventory write-off

 

 

-

 

 

 

2,482

 

Bad debt

 

 

-

 

 

 

50,500

 

Amortization on right of use asset

 

 

38,597

 

 

 

35,879

 

Realized loss on disposal of marketable securities

 

 

 

 

 

 

-

 

Unrealized loss on marketable securities

 

 

764,614

 

 

 

166,255

 

Gain on asset disposal

 

 

-

 

 

 

(1,522,704)

Common shares issued for services

 

 

1,200,000

 

 

 

85,000

 

Warrants issued for services

 

 

-

 

 

 

785,895

 

Lease accretion

 

 

5,195

 

 

 

7,912

 

  Gain on forgiveness of loan

 

 

 (7926

 

 

 

 

Change in working capital

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Accounts receivable

 

 

(137,491)

 

 

189,580

 

Inventory

 

 

(1,979)

 

 

95,037

 

Prepaid expenses and deposits

 

 

(257,508)

 

 

(137,158)

Accounts payable and accrued liabilities

 

 

50,726

 

 

 

13,803

 

Due to related parties

 

 

(5,223)

 

 

(53,481)

Deferred revenue

 

 

-

 

 

 

(44,255)

Net cash used in operating activities

 

$(4,879,339)

 

$(3,989,678)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash flows from (used in) investing activities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Intellectual property

 

 

(131,448)

 

 

(79,493)

Asset disposition

 

 

(49,192)

 

 

273,373

 

Net cash from (used in) investing activities

 

$(180,640)

 

$193,880

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash flows from (used in) financing activities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Long term loan

 

 

-

 

 

 

(22,744)

Lease payments

 

 

(44,600)

 

 

(43,950)

Proceeds from issuance of equity

 

 

-

 

 

 

9,471,497

 

Proceeds from warrant exercises

 

 

-

 

 

 

4,015,043

 

Net cash from (used in) financing activities

 

$(44,600)

 

$13,419,846

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Increase in cash

 

 

(5,104,579)

 

 

9,624,048

 

Cash, beginning of year

 

 

10,917,797

 

 

 

1,293,749

 

Cash, end of year

 

$5,813,218

 

 

$10,917,797

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Supplemental information of cash flows:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Income taxes paid in cash

 

$(4,782)

 

$(16,297)

Marketable securities received on accounts receivable

 

$278,108

 

 

$893,493

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

34

Table of Contents

LEXARIA BIOSCIENCE CORP.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

(Expressed in U.S. Dollars except number of shares)

 

 

SHARES

 

 

AMOUNT

$

 

 

ADDITIONAL

PAID-IN

CAPITAL $

 

 

DEFICIT

$

 

 

NCI

$

 

 

TOTAL

STOCKHOLDERS’

EQUITY

$

 

Balance August 31, 2020

 

 

3,001,476

 

 

 

3,001

 

 

 

30,324,398

 

 

 

(27,802,198)

 

 

(42,943)

 

 

2,482,258

 

Shares issued for services

 

 

12,178

 

 

 

12

 

 

 

84,988

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

85,000

 

Stock based compensation

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

410,007

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

410,007

 

Warrants issued for services

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

785,895

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

785,895

 

Exercise of stock options

 

 

610,189

 

 

 

610

 

 

 

4,014,433

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

4,015,043

 

Private Placements

 

 

2,102,856

 

 

 

2,104

 

 

 

9,469,393

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

9,471,497

 

Net loss

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

(4,027,006)

 

 

-

 

 

 

(4,027,006)

Non-controlling interest

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

(159,142)

 

 

(159,142)

Balance August 31, 2021

 

 

5,726,699

 

 

 

5,727

 

 

 

45,089,114

 

 

 

(31,829,204)

 

 

(202,085)

 

 

13,063,552

 

Shares issued for services

 

 

224,299

 

 

 

224

 

 

 

1,199,776

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

1,200,000

 

Stock based compensation

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

752,591

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

752,591

 

Net loss

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

(7,269,324)

 

 

-

 

 

 

(7,269,324)

Non-controlling interest

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

(114,329)

 

 

(114,329)

Balance August 31, 2022

 

 

5,950,998

 

 

 

5,951

 

 

 

47,041,481

 

 

 

(39,098,528)

 

 

(316,414)

 

 

7,632,490

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

35

Table of Contents

LEXARIA BIOSCIENCE CORP.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

August 31, 2017

(Expressed in U.S. Dollars)

1.

Organization, Business and Going Concern2022

1. Nature of Business

Lexaria Bioscience Corp. (“Lexaria”, “we”, “our” or the “Company”) is a biotechnology company pursuing the enhancement of the bioavailability of a diverse and broad range of active pharmaceutical ingredients (“API”) using our proprietary DehydraTECH drug delivery technology.

Revenues are generated from licensing contracts for the Company’s patented DehydraTECH technology based on the terms of use and defined geographic and licencing arrangements. We derive income from our third party contracted manufacturing of B2B DehydraTECH enhanced products made to customer specifications that are sold online and in-store in the US and Canada. We also perform contract services in R&D for customer specific formulations that are used in comparison testing to customers existing products.

Going Concern Consideration

The Company’s consolidated financial statements included herein have been prepared pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) and in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (“US GAAP”) applicable to a going concern which assumes the Company will have sufficient funds to pay it operational, research and development and capital expenditures for a period of at least 12 months from the date this Report.

Since inception, the Company has incurred significant operating and net losses. The losses attributable to shareholders were $7.34m, $4.2m and $4.1m for the years ended August 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020, respectively. As of August 31, 2022, we had an accumulated deficit of $39.1m. We expect to continue to incur significant operational expenses and net losses in the upcoming 12 months. Our net losses may fluctuate significantly from quarter to quarter and year to year, depending on the stage and complexity of our R&D studies and corporate expenditures, additional revenues received the licencing of our technology, if any, and the receipt of payments under any current or future collaborations we may enter into.

On January 12, 2021, the Company closed an underwritten public offering with net proceeds of $9,471,497. In the fourth quarter of the year ended August 31, 2021, the Company received $4,015,043 from the exercise of warrants. We did not receive any proceeds from the sale of shares or exercise of convertible securities in the year ended August 31, 2022. We may offer additional securities for sale during our fiscal year 2023 or thereafter in response to market conditions or other circumstances if we believe such a plan of financing is required to advance the Company’s business plans and is in the best interests of our stockholders.

The Company has evaluated whether there are conditions or events, considered in the aggregate, that raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. As of August 31, 2022, the Company had cash and cash equivalents of approximately $5.8m and carries no significant debt other than amounts payable in the short term. We believe this will sufficiently enable the Company to fund its operating and R&D expenses and any capital expenditure requirements through one year from the issuance date of the audited consolidated financial statements.

Impacts of COVID-19 Pandemic

The emergence of the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020 continues to present uncertainty and unforecastable new risks to the Company and its business plans. As of August 31, 2022, there has been no material impact on the Company’s financial position as a direct result of the pandemic. However, the Company has experienced some supply chain disruptions and shortages in the timely procurement of ingredients and supplies used in both our R&D activities and B2B production. Management views this situation as transitory but cannot predict the length of time it may take for these disruptions to dissipate or if there will be a significant economic effect on the Company’s operations. In the interim, it may cause delays in carrying out our research studies and in our production schedules.

There may be further actions we must take that alter our operations, including those that may be required by federal, state, provincial, or local authorities, or that we determine are in the best interests of our employees and other third parties with which we do business. We do not know when it will become practical to relax or eliminate some or all these measures entirely. The economic effect of a prolonged pandemic is difficult to predict and could result in material financial impact in the Company’s future reporting periods.

During the year ended August 31, 2020, we were in receipt of C$30,732 in COVID relief under the Canada Emergency Wage Subsidy programs for employees which reduced our employment costs in that year. During fiscal 2020 we also received C$40,000 from the Canadian Government sponsored Emergency Business Account loan program. As specified by the terms of this program, we have repaid C$30,000 of the loan in fiscal 2021. The remaining C$10,000 was forgiven and included as net loss in 2022.

 
36

Lexaria Biosciences Corp. (“Lexaria”, or the “Company”) Company was formed on December 9, 2004 under the laws of the State of Nevada as an independent oil and gas company engaged in the exploration, development and acquisition of oil and gas properties in the United States and Canada. In March of 2014, the Company began its entry into the bioscience and alternative health and wellness business and discontinued its involvement in the oil and gas business in November 2014. In May 2016, the Company also commenced out-licensing its patented technology for improved delivery of bioactive compounds that promotes healthy ingestion methods, lower overall dosing and higher effectiveness in active molecule delivery. The Company has its office in Kelowna, BC, Canada.

Table of Contents

2. Significant Accounting Policies

Basis of presentation and consolidation

These consolidated financial statements have been prepared in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles of the United States (“US GAAP”) and pursuant to the rules and regulations of the SEC. All amounts, unless otherwise stated, are in U.S. dollars.

These consolidated financial statements include the financial statements of the Company and its wholly owned subsidiaries; Lexaria Pharmaceutical Corp., Lexaria Hemp Corp., Lexaria CanPharm ULC, PoViva Corp., Lexaria CanPharm Holding Corp., and Kelowna Management Services Corp. The Company owns 83.3% of Lexaria Nicotine LLC and the remaining 16.7% is owned by Altria Ventures Inc. (an indirect wholly owned subsidiary of Altria Group, Inc.). All significant intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated upon consolidation.

On December 9, 2020, the Company completed the sale of the business assets in the THC related segment of our subsidiary Lexaria CanPharm ULC. As a result, the related financial results pertaining to the sale are reflected in our consolidated statement of operations, retrospectively, as discontinued operations beginning in the first quarter of fiscal 2021.

Cash and cash equivalents

Cash and cash equivalents include cash-on-hand and demand deposits with financial institutions and other short-term investments with maturities of less than three months when acquired and convertible to known cash amounts. The Company had no cash equivalents as at August 31, 2022 or August 31, 2021.

Leases

We have elected the package of practical expedients allowed under ASC Topic 842, Leases (“ASC 842”) which permits us to account for our existing operating leases as operating leases under the new guidance, without reassessing our prior conclusions about lease identification, lease classification and initial direct cost. As a result of the adoption of the new lease accounting guidance on September 1, 2019, we recognized operating lease right-of-use assets of $160,289 and operating lease liabilities of $158,773.

We determined the initial classification and measurement of our right-of-use assets and lease liabilities at the lease commencement date and thereafter if modified. The lease term includes any renewal options and termination options that we are reasonably certain to exercise. The present value of lease payments is determined by using the interest rate implicit in the lease, if that rate is readily determinable; otherwise, we use our incremental borrowing rate. The incremental borrowing rate is determined by using the rate of interest that we would pay to borrow on a collateralized basis an amount equal to the lease payments for a similar term and in a similar economic environment.

Operating lease expenses are recognized on a straight-line basis, unless the right-of-use asset has been impaired, over the reasonably certain lease term based on the total lease payments. They are included in operating expenses in the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive loss.

For operating leases that reflect impairment, we will recognize the amortization of the right-of-use asset on a straight-lined basis over the remaining lease term with rent expense still included in operating expenses in the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive loss. For all leases, rent payments that are based on a fixed index or rate at the lease commencement date are included in the measurement of lease assets and lease liabilities at the lease commencement date.

We have elected the practical expedient to not separate lease and non-lease components. Our non-lease components are primarily related to property taxes and maintenance, which vary based on future outcomes, and thus differences to original estimates are recognized in rent expense when incurred.

Intellectual property

Capitalized intellectual property represents US registered patents that include legal costs incurred in pursuing patents applications in the United States. When such applications result in patents being issued, the directly related capital cost is amortized over the life of the patent on a straight-line basis.

Equipment

Equipment is stated at cost less accumulated depreciation and impairment and depreciated using the straight-line method over their useful lives of the various asset classes. Laboratory and computer equipment and office furniture are depreciated over 3-10 years. Certain production equipment is depreciated by units of production method. Leasehold improvements are amortized over the term of the related leases.

 
37

The Company’s consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (U.S. GAAP) applicable to a going concern, which contemplates the realization of assets and the satisfaction of liabilities and commitments in the normal course of business. The Company has a net loss attributable to its common shareholders of $1,869,277 for the year ended August 31, 2017 (2016: $1,214,773) and at August 31, 2017 had a deficit accumulated since its inception of $13,169,939 (2016: $11,300,662). The Company has a working capital balance of $2,703,148 as at August 31, 2017 (2016: $76,285).

Table of Contents

Impairment of long-lived assets

Long-lived assets, including equipment and intangible assets, namely the Company’s patents, are assessed for potential impairment when there is evidence that events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recovered. An impairment loss is recognized when the carrying amount of the long-lived asset is not recoverable and exceeds its fair value. The carrying amount of a long-lived asset is not recoverable if it exceeds the sum of the undiscounted cash flows expected to result from the use and eventual disposition of the asset. Any required impairment loss is measured as the amount by which the carrying amount of the long-lived asset exceeds its fair value and is recorded as a reduction in the carrying value of the related asset and a charge to the profit or loss. Intangible assets with indefinite lives are tested for impairment annually and in interim periods if certain events occur indicating that the carrying value of the intangible assets may be impaired.

Revenue recognition

Licensing revenue from intellectual property

Our revenues from licenses that grant the right to access our intellectual property, which we consider symbolic licenses of IP, are recognized over time following the transfer and use of our patented infusion technology DehydraTECH . Royalty revenues are recognized in the period in which our licensees sell the related products and recognizes the related revenue, which in certain cases may require us to estimate our royalty revenue.

Usage fees from intellectual property

We recognize usage fees from B2B clients in the period in which the counterparty completes the manufacturing which incorporates DehydraTECH enabled APIs into the related product. We generally recognize revenue when we have satisfied all contractual obligations and are reasonably assured of collecting the resulting receivable. We are often entitled to bill our customers and receive payment from our customers in advance of recognizing the revenue.

Product revenue

We generally recognize revenue when we have satisfied all contractual obligations and are reasonably assured of collecting the resulting receivable. We are often entitled to bill our customers and receive payment from our customers in advance of recognizing the revenue.

Cost of sales

Cost of sales includes all expenditures incurred in bringing the goods to the point of sale This includes third-party manufacturing and handling costs, direct costs of the raw material, inbound freight charges, warehousing costs, and applicable overhead expenses.

Research and development

Research and development costs are expensed as incurred. These expenditures are comprised of both in-house research programs and through third-party contracts including consultants, academic and non-profit institutions, contract manufacturing, and other expenses.

Intellectual property expenses

Costs associated with intellectual property-related matters are expensed as incurred and included in general and administrative expenses within the consolidated statements of operations.

Stock-based compensation

The Company accounts for its stock-based compensation awards whereby all stock-based grants are recognized as expenses in the statements of operations based on the fair value at grant date subject to vesting dates. The grant date fair value of each option award is estimated using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model. The use of the Black-Scholes option-pricing model requires management to make assumptions with respect to the expected term of the option, the expected volatility of the common stock consistent with the expected life of the option, risk-free interest rates and expected dividend yields of the common stock.

 
38

The Company requires additional funds to maintain its operations and developments. Management’s plans in this regard are to raise equity and debt financing as required, but there is no certainty that such financing will be available or that it will be available at acceptable terms. The outcome of these matters cannot be predicted at this time.

Table of Contents

Foreign currency translation

The Company maintains its accounting records in US dollars. At the transaction date, each asset, liability, revenue, and expense that was acquired or incurred in a foreign currency is translated into US dollars by using the exchange rate in effect at that date; at the year end, monetary assets and liabilities are translated at the exchange rate in effect at that date. The resulting foreign exchange gains and losses are included within the consolidated statements of operations.

Loss per share

The calculation of loss per share uses the weighted average number of shares outstanding during the year. Diluted net income per share includes the effect, if any, from the potential exercise or conversion of securities, such as restricted stock and stock options, which would result in the issuance of incremental shares of common stock. Diluted loss per share is equivalent to basic loss per share if the potential exercise of the equity-based financial instruments was anti-dilutive.

Income taxes

The Company recognizes deferred tax liabilities and assets for the expected future tax consequences of events that have been recognized in the Company’s financial statements or tax returns using the liability method. Under this method, deferred tax liabilities and assets are determined based on the temporary differences between the financial statement and tax bases of assets and liabilities using enacted tax rates in effect in the year in which the differences are expected to reverse.

Comprehensive loss

The Company discloses comprehensive loss, its components, and accumulated balances on its Statement of Stockholders’ Equity. Comprehensive loss comprises equity changes except those transactions resulting from investments by stakeholders and owners and distributions to owners, if any.

Financial instruments

When measuring fair value, the Company seeks to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs. This establishes a fair value hierarchy based on the level of independent objective evidence surrounding the inputs used to measure fair value. A financial instrument’s categorization within the fair value hierarchy is based upon the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement. Inputs are prioritized into three levels used to measure fair value:

2.

Business Risk and Liquidity·

The Company is subject to several categories of risk associated with its operating activities. The production and sale of alternative health products is an emerging industry in which business practices are not yet standardized and are subject to frequent scrutiny and evaluation by federal, state, provincial, and municipal authorities, academics, and media outlets, among others. Although we intend to develop our businesses in accordance with best ethical practices, we may suffer negative publicity if we, our partners, contractors, or customers are found to have engaged in any environmentally insensitive practices or other business practices that are viewed as unethical.

Our operations may require licenses and permits from various governmental authorities. We believe that we will be able to obtain all necessary licenses and permits under applicable laws and regulations for our operations and believe we will be able to comply in all material respects with the terms of such licenses and permits. However, such licenses and permits are subject to change in various circumstances. There can be no guarantee that we will be able to obtain or maintain all necessary licenses and permits, and failing to obtain or retain required licenses could have a materially adverse effect on the Company.

Lexaria and its subsidiaries are not involved directly or indirectly in the cultivation, processing, distribution, or utilization of Cannabis or Cannabis derived components. All of Lexaria’s consumer products utilize legally sourced Hemp and Hemp components in their production. Lexaria does have an ancillary involvement risk via out-licensing of its patented technology to licensees that choose to utilize its technology to manufacture products that contain locally or state approved but federally regulated and controlled contents. There can be no guarantee that changes in the regulatory framework and environment will not occur and such changes could have a materially adverse effect on the Company. It is possible some jurisdictions may even interpret Lexaria’s ancillary involvement as in contravention with regulations.

47



3.

Significant Accounting Policies

a)

Accounting Principles

These consolidated financial statements have been prepared in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles of the United States of America. All amounts, unless otherwise stated, are in United States dollars.

b)

Basis of Presentation

On December 16, 2015, the Company completed a forward stock split of our authorized and issued and outstanding shares of common stock on a basis of 1 old share of common stock for 1.1 new shares of common stock. The forward stock split affected all the issued and outstanding common shares, stock options, and warrants at the effective date and increased authorized capital to 220,000,000, par value of $0.001. All common shares numbers, numbers of stock options, and warrants and related per share amounts disclosed in these consolidated financial statements have been retroactively adjusted to reflect the forward stock split.

c)

Basis of Consolidation

These consolidated financial statements include the financial statements of the Company, its wholly-owned subsidiary, Lexaria CanPharm Corp. which was incorporated on April 4, 2014, under the laws of Canada, 51%-owned subsidiary PoViva Tea, LLC which was incorporated on December 12, 2014, under the laws of the State of Nevada, and the 50%-owned subsidiary Ambarii Trade Corporation, which has no assets or liabilities, that was incorporated on April 24, 2017 under the laws of the Province of British Columbia. All significant inter-company balances and transactions have been eliminated.

d)

Revenue Recognition

Revenue from the sale of health products is generally recognized when persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, delivery has occurred, the sales price is fixed or determinable, and collectability is reasonably assured. In most cases, these conditions are met when the product is shipped to the customer. The Company reports its sales net of the amount of actual sales returns and the amount of reserves established for anticipated sales returns based upon historical return rates. Sales tax collected from customers is excluded from net sales.

Lexaria also enters into agreements to license out its patented technology that can include various combinations of services. Where elements are delivered over different periods of time, and when allowed under U.S. GAAP, revenue is allocated to the respective elements based on their relative selling prices at the inception of the arrangement, and revenue is recognized as each element is delivered. The Company uses a hierarchy to determine the fair value to be used for allocating revenue to elements: (i) vendor-specific objective evidence of fair value (“VSOE”), (ii) third-party evidence and (iii) best estimate of selling price (“ESP”). Generally VSOE is the price charged when the deliverable is sold separately or the price established by management for a product that is not yet sold if it is probable that the price will not change before introduction into the marketplace. ESPs are established as best estimates of what the selling prices would be if the deliverables were sold regularly on a stand-alone basis. Given Lexaria’s early stage of such line of revenue, the Company’s process for determining the VSOE and ESP requires judgment and considers multiple factors that may vary overtime depending upon the unique facts and circumstances related to each deliverable.

48



e)

Inventory and Cost of Sales

The Company’s inventory consists of finished goods, work in progress, and raw materials. In all classes, inventory is valued at the lower of cost or market. Cost is determined on a first-in, first-out basis.

Cost of sales includes all expenditures incurred in bringing the goods to the point of sale. Inventory costs and costs of sales include direct costs of the raw material, inbound freight charges, warehousing costs, handling costs (receiving and purchasing) and utilities and overhead expenses related to the Company’s manufacturing and processing facilities.

f)

Cash and Cash Equivalents

Cash equivalents comprise certain highly liquid instruments with a maturity of three months or less when purchased. As of August 31, 2017, and August 31, 2016, The Company held cash only.

g)

Equipment

Equipment is stated at cost less accumulated depreciation, and depreciated using the straight-line method over its useful life of five years.

h)

Patents

Capitalized patent costs represent legal costs incurred to establish patents. When patents reach a mature stage, any associated legal costs are comprised mostly of maintenance fees and are expensed as incurred. Capitalized patent costs are amortized on a straight-line basis over the remaining life of the patent. The Company was granted its first patent on October 25, 2016 (Note 8), with a legal life of 20 years.

i)

Stock-Based Compensation

Company accounts for its stock-based compensation awards in accordance with ASC Topic 718, Compensation—Stock Compensation (“ASC 718”). ASC 718 requires all stock-based payments to employees, including grants of employee stock options, to be recognized as expense in the statements of operations based on their grant date fair values. For stock options granted to employees and to members of the Board of Directors for their services on the Board of Directors, the Company estimates the grant date fair value of each option award using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model. The use of the Black-Scholes option-pricing model requires management to make assumptions with respect to the expected term of the option, the expected volatility of the common stock consistent with the expected life of the option, risk-free interest rates and expected dividend yields of the common stock.

Stock-based payments issued to non-employees are recorded at their fair values, and are periodically revalued as the equity instruments vest and are recognized as expense over the related service period in accordance with the provisions of ASC 718 and ASC Topic 505, Equity. For equity instruments granted to non-employees, the Company recognizes stock-based compensation expense on vesting.

j)

Loss Per Share

The Company applies the guidance in ASC 260 Earnings Per Share. Loss per share is computed using the weighted average number of shares outstanding during the period. Diluted loss per share is equivalent to basic loss per share because the potential exercise of the equity-based financial instruments was anti-dilutive.

49



k)

Foreign Currency Translation

The Company’s operations are located in the United States of America and Canada, and it has offices in Canada. The Company maintains its accounting records in U.S. Dollars, as follows:

At the transaction date, each asset, liability, revenue and expense that was acquired or incurred in a foreign currency is translated into U.S. dollars by the using of the exchange rate in effect at that date. At the period end, monetary assets and liabilities are translated at the exchange rate in effect at that date. The resulting foreign exchange gains and losses are included in profit or loss.

l)

Financial Instruments

ASC 820 Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures, requires an entity to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value. ASC 820 establishes a fair value hierarchy based on the level of independent, objective evidence surrounding the inputs used to measure fair value. A financial instrument’s categorization within the fair value hierarchy is based upon the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement. ASC 820 prioritizes the inputs into three levels that may be used to measure fair value:

Level 1 - Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities;

·

Level 2 - Inputs other than quoted prices included within Level 1 that are either directly or indirectly observable; and

·

Level 3 - Unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity, therefore requiring an entity to develop its own assumptions about the assumptions that market participants would use in pricing.

The Company’s financial instruments consist primarily of cash, accounts and other receivable, accounts payable and accrued liabilities, due to related parties, and convertible debenture. The carrying amounts of cash, accounts and other receivable, accounts payable and accrued liabilities, and due to related parties approximate their fair values due to their short maturities. The carrying value of the Company’s convertible debenture approximates its fair value based on comparison of the interest rate and terms of such debt to the rates and terms of debt currently available to the Company.

The Company is located in Canada, which results in exposure to market risks from changes

The Company’s financial instruments consist primarily of cash, marketable securities, accounts receivable and payable, accrued liabilities and loan payable. The carrying amounts of instruments approximate their fair values due to their short maturities or quoted market prices.

The Company’s headquarters and operations are located in Canada which results in exposure to market risks from fluctuations in foreign currency rates. The foreign currency exchange risk is the financial risk to the Company’s operations that arise from fluctuations in foreign exchange rates and the degree of volatility of these rates. Currently, the Company does not use derivative instruments to reduce its exposure to foreign currency risk as the Company does not hold a significant position in foreign currencies, such as the Canadian dollar, and the impact of a change in a few basis points for USD/CAD is not expected to be material.

m)

Income Taxes

The Company applies the guidance in ASC 740, Income Taxes, which requires the Company to recognize deferred tax liabilities and assets for the expected future tax consequences of events that have been recognized in the Company’s financial statements or tax returns using the liability method. Under this method, deferred tax liabilities and assets are determined based on the temporary differences between the financial statement and tax bases of assets and liabilities using enacted tax rates in effect in the year in which the differences are expected to reverse.

50



n)

Impairment of Long-Lived Assets

Long-lived assets, including equipment, and intangible assets, such as the Company’s patents, are assessed for potential impairment when there is evidence that events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recovered. An impairment loss is recognized when the carrying amount of the long-lived asset is not recoverable and exceeds its fair value. The carrying amount of a long-lived asset is not recoverable if it exceeds the sum of the undiscounted cash flows expected to result from the use and eventual disposition of the asset. Any required impairment loss is measured as the amount by which the carrying amount of the long-lived asset exceeds its fair value and is recorded as a reduction in the carrying value of the related asset and a charge to the profit or loss. Intangible assets with indefinite lives are tested for impairment annually and in interim periods if certain events occur indicating that the carrying value of the intangible assets may be impaired.

o)

Comprehensive Income

The Company applies ASC 220, Comprehensive Income, which establishes standards for reporting and presentation of comprehensive income, its components and accumulated balances. The Company discloses this information on its Statement of Stockholders’ Equity. Comprehensive income comprises equity changes except those transactions resulting from investments by owners and distributions to owners.

p)

Credit Risk and Receivable Concentration

The Company places its cash with a high credit quality financial institution. As of August 31, 2017, the Company had approximately $2,533,000 in the bank (August 31, 2016: $93,000).

As at August 31, 2017, the Company had $43,515 (2016 - $27,583) in sales tax receivable (Note 6). The Company considers its credit risk to be low for such receivable.

q)

Convertible Debenture

The Company accounts for its convertible debt instruments that may be settled in cash upon conversion according to ASC 470-20-30-22 which requires the proceeds from the issuance of such convertible debt instruments to be allocated between debt and equity components so that debt is discounted to reflect the Company’s non-convertible debt borrowing rate.

Further, the Company applies ASC 470-20-35-13 which requires the debt discount to be amortized over the period the convertible debt is expected to be outstanding as additional non-cash interest expense.

r)

Commitments and Contingencies

In accordance with ASC 450-20, Accounting for Contingencies, the Company records accruals for such loss contingencies when it is probable that a liability has been incurred and the amount of loss can be reasonably estimated. In the event that estimates or assumptions prove to differ from actual results, adjustments are made in subsequent periods to reflect more current information. Historically, the Company has not experienced any material claims.

s)

Research and Development

Research and development costs are expensed as incurred.

51



t)

Advertising

The Company expenses advertising costs as they are incurred. The advertising expenses were $209,034 and $185,459 for the years ended August 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively.


4.

Estimates and Judgments

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S GAAP requires us to make certain estimates, judgments and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, the disclosure of contingent liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting period. Some of the Company’s accounting policies require us to make subjective judgments, often as a result of the need to make estimates of matters that are inherently uncertain. These accounting policies involve critical accounting estimates because they are particularly dependent on estimates and assumptions made by management about matters that are highly uncertain at the time the accounting estimates are made. Although we have used our best estimates based on facts and circumstances available to us at the time, different estimates reasonably could have been used. Changes in the accounting estimates used by the Company are reasonably likely to occur from time to time, which may have a material effect on the presentation of financial condition and results of operations.

The Company reviews these estimates, judgments and assumptions periodically and reflect the effects of revisions in the period in which they are deemed to be necessary. We believe that these estimates are reasonable; however, actual results could differ from these estimates

Significant accounting estimates and assumptions are used for, but not limited to:

a)

The Valuation of Deferred Tax Assets

Judgement is required in determining whether deferred tax assets are recognized on the balance sheet. The recognition of deferred tax assets requires management to assess the likelihood that the Company will generate taxable income in future periods to utilize the deferred tax assets. Due to the Company’s history of losses, deferred tax assets have not be recognized by Lexaria.

b)

Convertible Debenture

The Company entered into a convertible debenture agreement on March 8, 2016 (Note 10) and evaluated the terms of the various conversion options to assess if separate accounting is required for such embedded features, which are adjusted to fair value through earnings at each reporting period. The Company determined that the embedded features within the debenture do not meet the net settlement provision characteristic of a derivative and as a result, did not apply the bifurcation requirements for such conversion options.

c)

Revenue Recognition of Licenses

Pursuant to the license agreement for the Company’s lipid infusion technology (the “Technology”) (Note 9), the licensee acquired territorial licenses for an upfront fee. The Company is also required to provide support services in connection with the licensee’s use of the Technology over the term of the license. As the support services will not be sold on a stand-alone basis, the Company is unable to establish VSOE of their fair value to be able to allocate the proceeds objectively to such services and the license. Accordingly, the up-front fee is being recognized ratably over the term of the license, which is initially for two years.

52



d)

Value of Stock Options

The Company provides compensation benefits to its employees, directors, officers, and consultants, through a stock option plan. The fair value of each option award is estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. Expected volatility assumptions used in the model is based on the historical volatility of the Company’s share price. The Company uses historical data to estimate the period of option exercises for use in the valuation model. The risk-free interest rate for the expected term of the option is based on the yields of government bonds. Changes in these assumptions, especially the share price volatility and the expected life determination could have a material impact on the Company’s profit and loss for the periods presented. All estimates used in the model are based on historical data which may not be representative of future results.


5.

New Accounting Pronouncements

In May 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (the “FASB”) issued a new standard related to the revenue recognition. Under the new standard, recognition of revenue occurs when a customer obtains control of promised goods or services in an amount that reflects the consideration which the entity expects to receive in exchange for those goods or services. In addition, the standard requires disclosure of the nature, amount, timing, and uncertainty of revenue and cash flows arising from contracts with customers. The FASB has recently issued several amendments to the standards, including clarification on the accounting for licenses of intellectual property and identifying performance obligations.

The guidance permits two methods of adoption: retrospectively to each prior reporting period presented (full retrospective method), or retrospectively with the cumulative effect of initially applying the guidance recognized at the date of initial application (the cumulative catch-up transition method). The Company will apply the full retrospective approach to adopt the standard but does not anticipate that this standard will have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.

In July 2015, FASB issued ASU 2015-11, Simplifying the Measurement of Inventory (“ASU 2015-11”). ASU 2015-11 requires that an entity measure inventory at the lower of cost and net realizable value. This ASU does not apply to inventory measured using last-in, first-out methodology. ASU 2015-11 is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016, including interim periods within that reporting period. The Company does not expect the new standard to have a significant impact on its consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

In November 2015, the FASB issued guidance that requires companies to classify all deferred tax assets or liabilities as noncurrent on the balance sheet rather than separately disclosing deferred taxes as current and noncurrent. This standard is effective for the Company beginning on September 1, 2017 and can be applied either prospectively or retrospectively to all periods presented upon adoption. The standard is not expected to have any impact on the Company’s financial statements.

In January 2016, FASB issued a new standard to amend certain aspects of recognition, measurement, presentation, and disclosure of financial instruments. Most prominent among the amendments is the requirement for changes in fair value of equity investments, with certain exceptions, to be recognized through profit or loss rather than other comprehensive income. The new standard will be effective for the Company beginning September 1, 2018. The standard is not expected to have any impact on the Company’s financial statements.

In February 2016 FASB issued ASU No. 2016-02, Leases(Topic 842)which supersedes FASB ASC Topic 840, Leases (Topic 840) and provides principles for the recognition, measurement, presentation, and disclosure of leases for both lessees and the lessors. The new standard requires the lessees to apply a dual approach, classifying leases as either finance or operating leases based on the principle of whether or not the lease is effectively a financed purchase by the lessee. The classification will determine whether lease expense is recognized based on an effective interest method or on a straight-line basis over the term of the lease, respectively. A lessee is also required to record a right-of-use asset and a lease liability for all leases with a term of greater than twelve months

53



regardless of classification. Leases with a term of twelve months or less will be accounted for similar to existing guidance for operating leases. The standard is effective for annual and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2018, with early adoption permitted upon issuance. When adopted, the Company does not expect this guidance to have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.

In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-09, Compensation-Stock Compensation (Topic 718), Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting. Under ASU 2016-09, companies will no longer record excess tax benefits and certain tax deficiencies in additional paid in capital (“APIC”). Instead, they will record all excess tax benefits and tax deficiencies as income tax expense or benefit in the income statement and the APIC pools will be eliminated. In addition, ASU 2016-09 eliminates the requirement that excess tax benefits be realized before companies can recognize them. ASU 2016-09 also requires companies to present excess tax benefits as an operating activity on the statement of cash flows rather than as a financing activity. Furthermore, ASU 2016-09 will increase the amount an employer can withhold to cover income taxes on awards and still qualify for the exception to liability classification for shares used to satisfy the employer’s statutory income tax withholding obligation. An employer with a statutory income tax withholding obligation will now be allowed to withhold shares with the fair value up to the amount of taxes owed using the maximum statutory rate in the employee’s applicable jurisdiction(s). ASU 2016-09 requires a company to classify the cash paid to a tax authority when shares are withheld to satisfy its statutory income tax withholding obligation as a financing activity on the statement of cash flows. Under current U.S. GAAP, it is not specified how these cash flows should be classified. In addition, companies will now have to elect whether to account for forfeitures on share-based payments by (1) recognizing forfeiture awards as they occur or (2) estimating the number of awards expected to be forfeited and adjusting the estimate when it is likely to change, as is currently required. The amendments of this ASU are effective for reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016, with early adoption permitted but all of the guidance must be adopted in the same period. The Company does not expect this guidance to have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.

In June 2016, the FASB issued a new standard to replace the incurred loss impairment methodology in current U.S. GAAP with a methodology that reflects expected credit losses and requires consideration of a broader range of reasonable and supportable information to inform credit loss credit loss estimates. For trade and other receivables, loans and other financial instruments, the Company will be required to use a forward-looking expected loss model rather than the incurred loss model for recognizing credit losses which reflects losses that are probable. Credit losses relating to available for sale debt securities will also be recorded through an allowance for credit losses rather than as a reduction in the amortized cost basis of the securities. The new standard will be effective for Lexaria beginning September 1, 2020, with early adoption permitted. Application of the amendments is through a cumulative-effect adjustment to deficit as of the effective date. The Company is currently assessing the impact of the standard on its consolidated financial statements.

6.

Accounts and Other Receivable


   August 31  August 31 
   2017  2016 
   $  $ 
 Trade and deposits receivable 1,778  - 
 Territory License Fee receivable (Note 9) -  10,000 
 Sales tax receivable 43,515  27,583 
 Private placement receivable (Note 11) -  93,500 
   45,293  131,083 

54



7.

Inventory


   August 31  August 31 
   2017  2016 
   $  $ 
 Raw materials 14,220  27,358 
 Finished goods 42,266  94,349 
 Work in progress 10,688  13,017 
   67,174  134,724 

During the year ended August 31, 2017, the Company wrote down $68,611 (2016 - $44,040) of inventory to reflect its net realisable value.

8.

Alternative Health Products

On November 12, 2014, the Company signed an agreement with Poppy’s Teas LLC. (“PoViva”) acquired 51% of ViPova™. The Company had the option to acquire an additional 24% interest in PoViva. Lexaria acquired 100% ownership interest in PoViva Tea, LLC subsequent to August 31, 2017 via compensation of $70,000, a waiver on certain debts owed to Lexaria, and a 5%, 20-year royalty on net profits of ViPova TeaTMtea, coffee, and hot chocolate sales. No Lexaria stock or options were issued.

As at August 31, 2017, the Company’s granted patent has a priority date of June 10, 2014, a publish date of October 25, 2016, and protects the Company’s technology for twenty years.

On August 11, 2015, Lexaria signed a license agreement with PoViva Tea LLC for $10,000, granting Lexaria a 35-year non exclusive worldwide license to unencumbered use of PoViva Tea LLC’s IP Rights, including rights of resale. This license agreement ensures Lexaria has full access to the underlying patent pending infusion Technology.

Patents


   August 31  August 31 
   2017  2016 
   $  $ 
 Balance – Beginning 53,997  36,989 
 Additions 9,699  17,008 
 Amortization (869) - 
 Balance – Ending 62,827  53,997 

October 19, 2017, the Company receiveddoes not use derivative instruments to reduce its exposure to foreign currency risk as the impact of a new Notice of Allowance from the United States Patent and Trademark Office (“USPTO”)rate changes for the use of its technology as a delivery platform for all cannabinoids including THC; fat soluble vitamins; non steroidal anti-inflammatory pain medications (“NSAIDs”); and nicotine. Lexaria expects formal patent issuance within three to four months whichUSD/CAD dollars is not expected to provide protection until at least 2035. be material.

Credit risk and receivable concentration

The patent application number is 15/225,799, “Food and Beverage Compositions Infused With Lipophilic Active Agents and MethodsCompany places its cash with a high credit quality financial institution. As of Use Thereof”August 31, 2022, the Company had approximately $5.8m on deposit. (August 31, 2021: $10.9m).

55



9.

Unearned Revenue

On May 14, 2016, the Company entered into a licensing agreement (the “Licensing Agreement”) with an arm’s length party (the “Licensee”) allowing the Licensee, for a two-year period, to utilize the Company’s Technology to create, test, manufacture, and sell marijuana-infused consumable and/or topical products, in the state of Colorado, with an option of extending the terms of the Licensing Agreement to Washington, Oregon, and California (the “Territorial License”). In addition to the granting of the license, the Company is required to provide support services to the Licensee in connection with the use of the Company’s Technology during the term of the Licensing Agreement.

The Company determined that the provision of the support services is a separate deliverable under the Licensing Agreement. As the support services will not be sold on a stand-alone basis, the Company is unable to establish a vendor-specific objective evidence of fair value of such services to be able to objectively allocate the Territorial License fee receipts between the license and the support services. Accordingly, the Company recognizes revenue ratably over the term of the Licensing Agreement. As of August 31, 2017, the Company had received the full $50,000 of the Territory License Fee. During the year ended August 31, 2017, $25,417 was recognized as revenue (Note 13) with the remaining $17,083 deferred for recognition in future periods.


   August 31  August 31 
   2017  2016 
   $  $ 
 Balance – Beginning 12,500  - 
 Territorial License fees received/receivable (Note 6) 30,000  20,000 
 Advance payments on product sales 4,900  - 
 Earned revenue (Note 13) (30,317) (7,500)
 Balance – Ending 17,083  12,500 

10.

Convertible Debenture

On March 8, 2016, the Company closed a private placement offering of a convertible debenture in the aggregate amount of $45,000. The convertible debenture was to mature on August 31, 2020, with an interest rate of 10% per annum (on a simple basis) and was convertible at varying prices over time.

The Company determined that the conversion options did not qualify as derivatives as they did not meet the net settlement provision characteristics. The proceeds from the convertible debenture therefore were not bifurcated on the balance sheet.

During the year ended August 31, 2017, the Company paid interest of $4,500 (2016 - $2,250) in connection with the convertible debenture.

As at August 31, 2017, the convertible debenture was converted into common shares for the amount of $45,000 at $0.15 per share for 300,000 common shares plus the accrued interest of $1,125 for 7,500 shares for a total of 307,500 common shares issued on conversion.

56



11.

Common Shares and Warrants

Fiscal 2017 Activity

During September and October 2017 the Company received $93,500 of private placement receivable (Note 6) as at August 31, 2016.

On October 11, 2016, pursuant to its agreement with Docherty Management Ltd. (Note 16), the Company issued 252,000 common shares with a value of $35,760.

On October 11, 2016, pursuant to the Advisory Agreement, the Company issued 750,000 warrants with an exercise price of $0.14 per share and term of five years, in return for consulting services. The Company recognized the fair value of $32,252 from 250,000 of such warrants for services received during the year ended August 31, 2016, and further recognized $59,490 for the remaining 500,000 warrants issued in return for consulting services received during the year ended August 31, 2017.

The Company reached an agreement with a director to settle the outstanding amount pursuant to an advisory agreement (Note 14), through issuance of common shares of the Company.


DateAmount(2)SharesPrice
October 31, 2016(1)$16,000114,286$0.14
February 27, 2017$16,00029,091$0.55
May 31, 2017$12,00035,294$0.34
August 25, 2017$12,00032,433$0.37

(1) A Total of $8,000 of the $16,000 was recognized as consulting fees during the year ended August 31, 2016.
(2) There was2022, one licensee accounted for 100% (2021 – 72%) of revenues. At fiscal year end 2022, we had $37,248 (2021 - $Nil) in licence fees receivable. The Company incurred a $NIL difference betweenbad debt in fiscal 2021 ($50,500) primarily due to cancellations of IP license agreements.

As at August 31, 2022, the Company had $84,162 (2021 - $47,741) in sales tax receivable. The Company considers its credit risk to be low for such receivables.

39

Table of Contents

Commitments and contingencies

The Company policy is to record accruals for any such loss contingencies when it is probable that a liability has been incurred and the amount of loss can be reasonably estimated. In the event that estimates, or assumptions prove to differ from actual results, adjustments are made in subsequent periods to reflect more current information. The Company, from time to time, may be subject to legal claims and proceedings related to matters arising in the ordinary course of business. Management has no knowledge of any such claim against the Company with, at minimum, a reasonable possibility that a material loss may be incurred.

3. Recent Accounting Guidance

Pronouncements Issued but Not Yet Adopted

In June 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-13, Financial Instruments—Credit Losses (Topic 326): Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments. The FASB subsequently issued amendments to ASU 2016-13, which have the same effective date and transition date of January 1, 2023. These standards require that credit losses be reported using an expected losses model rather than the incurred losses model that is currently used, and establishes additional disclosures related to credit risks. For available-for-sale debt securities with unrealized losses, these standards now require allowances to be recorded instead of reducing the amortized cost of the investment. These standards limit the amount of credit losses to be recognized for available-for-sale debt securities to the amount by which carrying value exceeds fair value and requires the reversal of previously recognized credit losses if fair value increases. The Company does not currently expect the adoption of these standards to have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.

4. Estimates and Judgments

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with US GAAP requires us to make certain estimates, judgments and assumptions that affect the reported amount of assets and liabilities, the disclosure of contingent liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amount of revenue and expenses during the fiscal period. Some of the Company’s accounting policies require us to make subjective judgments, often as a result of the need to make estimates of matters that are inherently uncertain. These accounting policies involve critical accounting estimates because they are particularly dependent on estimates and assumptions made by management about matters that are highly uncertain at the time the accounting estimates are made. Although we have used our best estimates based on facts and circumstances available to us at the time, different estimates reasonably could have been used. Changes in the accounting estimates used by the Company are reasonably likely to occur from time to time, which may have a material effect on the presentation of financial condition and results of operations.

Management reviews our estimates, judgments, and assumptions periodically and reflect the effects of any revisions in the period in which they are deemed to be necessary. We believe that these estimates are reasonable. However, actual results could differ from these estimates.

Significant accounting estimates and assumptions are used for, but not limited to:

Revenue Recognition

The Company records revenue from out-licensing our technology, including the License Agreement with Premier Wellness Science Co. Ltd. Judgment is necessary to determine the appropriate amount of revenue to be recognized as the Company fulfils its obligations under these agreements. The Company has granted the counterparty a license to develop and commercialize the underlying licensed product and these agreements contain license fee payments, sales-based royalty payments and additional performance obligations related to the license after delivery.

The Valuation of Deferred Tax Assets

Judgment is required in determining whether deferred tax assets are recognized on the balance sheet. The recognition of deferred tax assets requires management to assess the likelihood that the Company will generate taxable income in future periods to utilize the deferred tax assets. Due to the Company’s history of losses, deferred tax assets have not been recognized by Lexaria.

Value of Stock Options and Warrants

The Company provides compensation benefits to its employees, officers, directors, and consultants, through a stock option plan. The fair value of each option award is estimated on the shares issueddate of grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model. Expected volatility assumptions used in the model are based on the historical volatility of the Company’s share price. The Company uses historical data to estimate the period of option exercises for use in the valuation model. The risk-free interest rate for the expected term of the option is based on the yields of government bonds. Changes in these assumptions, especially the share price volatility and the carryingexpected life determination could have a material impact on the Company’s profit and loss for the years presented. All estimates used in the model are based on historical data which may not be representative of future results.

40

Table of Contents

Disposals of Assets - Value of Note Receivable

The Asset Purchase Agreement for the sale of assets to Hill Street Beverages included C$2m note (the “Note”) receivable as partial payment of the agreement. The Note does not contain a fixed repayment schedule nor a maturity date. The repayment of the Note is based on the purchaser repaying the outstanding value of the debt.

On November 1, 2016,Note and interest from the Company issued 56,250 shares of its common stock for services amounting to $9,000, recognized within accounts payablefuture revenues generated from an untested market with no existing revenue streams. Therefore, with any repayment being highly doubtful, management determined at that time and accrued liabilities as at August 31, 2016.

On November 1, 2016,2022 & 2021 that the Company issued 500,000 warrants to a consultant. Each warrant entitles the consultant to purchase one common sharevalue of the Companynote to be notional and recorded the note at a price$Nil value for accounting purposes.

5. Marketable Securities

The components of $0.31 per share with a term expiring on May 31, 2017. The Company recognized $48,313, representing the fair value of such warrants.Marketable Securities were as follows:

During November, 2016, the Company provided to its warrant holders, an incentive for early exercise of their previously held warrants. Upon exercise of each warrant, in addition to

 

 

Cost Basis

 

 

Unrealized Gains

 

 

Unrealized Losses

 

 

Total

 

 

 

$

 

 

$

 

 

$

 

 

$

 

August 31, 2020

 

 

56,250

 

 

 

9,441

 

 

 

(28,762)

 

 

19,321

 

Common Stock

 

 

980,775

 

 

 

6,802

 

 

 

(190,665)

 

 

 

 

August 31, 2021

 

 

1,037,025

 

 

 

16,243

 

 

 

(219,427)

 

 

833,841

 

Common Stock

 

 

278,107

 

 

 

118,195

 

 

 

(822,809)

 

 

 

 

August 31,2022

 

 

1,315,132

 

 

 

134,438

 

 

 

(1,102,236)

 

 

347,335

 

Marketable securities represented the common shares of Hill Street Beverage Company Inc. held by Lexaria. Unrealized losses from common stock are due to market price movements. In Management’s opinion based on the evaluation of available information at the year ended August 31, 2022, unrealized losses represent temporary impairments.

6. Accounts and Other Receivables

 

 

August 31

 

 

August 31

 

 

 

2022

 

 

2021

 

 

 

$

 

 

$

 

Trade and deposits receivable

 

 

80,374

 

 

 

16,553

 

Territory license fee receivable

 

 

37,248

 

 

 

-

 

Sale of assets - shares receivable

 

 

-

 

 

 

278,107

 

Sales tax receivable

 

 

84,162

 

 

 

47,741

 

 

 

 

201,784

 

 

 

342,401

 

7. Inventory

 

 

August 31

 

 

August 31

 

 

 

2022

 

 

2021

 

 

 

$

 

 

$

 

Raw materials

 

 

38,418

 

 

 

29,648

 

In the year ended August 31, 2022, inventory valued at $2,465 (2021 $2,482) was written off to reflect its net realisable value.

In the year ended August 31, 2021, the Company divested its operations in on-line sales of consumer products and as a result finished goods inventory valued at $44,851 was expensed as advertising and promotion with the warrant holders receivedgoods being donated to a second warrant with identical terms to purchase one additional common shareregistered charity.

8. Prepaid Expenses

Prepaid expenses consist of the Company. following as at August 31, 2022 and August 31, 2021:

 

 

August 31

 

 

August 31

 

 

 

2022

 

 

2021

 

 

 

$

 

 

$

 

Advertising and conferences

 

 

359,863

 

 

 

168,760

 

Consulting

 

 

-

 

 

 

18,750

 

Legal fees

 

 

25,000

 

 

 

31,380

 

Licence, filing fees, dues

 

 

15,000

 

 

 

19,500

 

Office and insurance

 

 

80,863

 

 

 

80,863

 

Capital Financing

 

 

96,035

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

 

576,761

 

 

 

319,253

 

41

Table of Contents

9. Intellectual Property

The Company raised $737,508 from this early exercise warrant incentive program. A totalfollowing is a list of 3,245,000 warrants were exercised at a weighted average exercise price of $0.23 and the Company issued 3,245,000 common shares as well as 3,245,000 additional warrants to purchase common shares with an exercise price of $0.23 per share, expiring on May 14, 2017. The fair value of these additional warrants was determined to be $298,777, and is recorded within additional paid-in capital with a net effect of $nil.

On January 10, 2017, the Company issued 500,000 warrants to a consultant. Each warrant entitles the consultant to purchase one common share of the Company at a price of $0.44 per share with a term expiring on January 9, 2018. The Company recognized $112,725, representing the fair value of such warrants.

57


On April 3, 2017, the Company closed its brokered private placement of 4,104,280 units at a price per Unit of $0.42 for total gross proceeds of $1,723,798. Each Unit consists of one common share and one-half of one Share purchase warrant (2,052,140). Each whole Warrant entitles the holder to acquire one common share of the Company at a price of $0.60 per Share for a period of 24 months. The Agents received a cash commission of seven percent ($120,666) of the gross proceeds and 287,300 compensation units exercisable for a period of 24 months at an exercise price of $0.42 consisting of one common share and one half share purchase warrant. Each whole compensation warrant is exercisable for one common share at an exercise price of $0.60 for a period of 24 months following closing. The fair value of these compensation units was determined to be $64,162. There was $61,390 of other share issuance costs.

On June 19, 2017, pursuant to the agreement with Alex Blanchard Capital (Note 16) the Company issued 200,000 warrants exercisable at $0.29 for two years. The Company recognized $37,878, representing the fair value of such warrants.

On June 22, 2017, pursuant to the agreement with Mr. Chris Bunka (Note 16), the Company issued 210,000 common shares at $0.295 per share for $61,950, for services rendered as the Chief Executive Officer ofcapitalized US patents held by the Company.

On June 22, 2017, pursuant to the agreement with Mr. John Docherty (Note 16), the Company issued 210,000 common shares at $0.295 per share

Issued Patent #

Patent Certificate Grant Date

Patent Family

US 9,474,725 B1

10/25/2016

Food and Beverage Compositions Infused With Lipophilic Active Agents and Methods of Use Thereof

US 9,839,612 B2

12/12/2017

US 9,972,680 B2

05/15/2018

US 9,974,739 B2

05/22/2018

US 10,084,044 B2

09/25/2018

US 10,103,225 B2

10/16/2018

US 10,381,440

08/13/2019

US 10,374,036

08/06/2019

US 10,756,180

08/25/2020

US 11,311,559

04/26/2022

Compositions and Methods for Enhanced Delivery of Antiviral Agents

Schedule of continuity for $61,950, for services rendered as the President of the Company.capitalized patents:

On August 15, 2017, the Company issued 500,000 warrants to a consultant. Each warrant entitles the consultant to purchase one common share of the Company at a price of $0.44 per share with a term expiring on August 14, 2018. The Company recognized $34,344, representing the fair value of such warrants.

 

 

August 31

 

 

August 31

 

 

 

2022

 

 

2021

 

 

 

$

 

 

$

 

Balance – Beginning

 

 

364,623

 

 

 

292,000

 

Addition

 

 

131,448

 

 

 

79,493

 

Amortization

 

 

(7,609)

 

 

(6,870)

Balance – Ending

 

 

488,462

 

 

 

364,623

 

Patents are amortized over their legal life of 20 years.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

On August 25, 2017, the Company issued 307,500 shares at $0.15 per share of its common stock for the conversion of the convertible debt of $45,000 plus accrued interest of $1,125 (Note 10).10. Property & Equipment

Year Ended Aug. 31, 2022

 

Cost

 

 

Amortization

 

 

Additions

 

 

Disposals

 

 

Accumulated

Amortization

 

 

Net Balance

 

 

 

$

 

 

$

 

 

$

 

 

$

 

 

$

 

 

$

 

Leasehold improvements

 

 

259,981

 

 

 

(54,037)

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

(194,685)

 

 

65,296

 

Computers

 

 

63,964

 

 

 

(9,874)

 

 

6,817

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

(61,424)

 

 

9,357

 

Furniture & fixtures

 

 

31,126

 

 

 

(6,417)

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

(22,837)

 

 

8,288

 

Lab equipment

 

 

291,235

 

 

 

(31,572)

 

 

42,375

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

(101,047)

 

 

232,564

 

 

 

 

646,306

 

 

 

(101,900)

 

 

49,192

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

(379,993)

 

 

315,505

 

Year Ended Aug. 31, 2021

 

Cost

 

 

Amortization

 

 

Additions

 

 

Disposals

 

 

Accumulated

Amortization

 

 

Net Balance

 

 

 

$

 

 

$

 

 

$

 

 

$

 

 

$

 

 

$

 

Leasehold improvements

 

 

259,981

 

 

 

(54,038)

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

(140,648)

 

 

119,333

 

Computers

 

 

63,964

 

 

 

(19,681)

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

(51,550)

 

 

12,414

 

Furniture & fixtures

 

 

34,220

 

 

 

(6,417)

 

 

-

 

 

 

(3,094)

 

 

(16,420)

 

 

14,706

 

Lab equipment

 

 

291,235

 

 

 

(35,008)

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

(69,475)

 

 

221,760

 

 

 

 

649,400

 

 

 

(115,144)

 

 

-

 

 

 

(3,094)

 

 

(278,093)

 

 

368,213

 

During the year ended August 31, 2017, a total2022, amortization of 1,014,125 incentive stock options were exercised for proceeds of $177,262. A total of 10,322,025 warrants were exercised for proceeds of $2,233,032, of which 3,245,000 warrants related to the early exercise warrant incentive program.

Fiscal 2016 Activity

On September 16, 2015, the Company’s Board appointed Ted McKechnie as a Director of the Company. Mr. McKechnie$3,655 (2021 - $10,926) was issued 110,000 common shares of the Company valued at $19,000.

On December 10, 2015, Lexaria closed a private placement by issuing 550,000 units for gross proceeds of $90,000. Each unit consisted of one common share of the Company and one half transferable share purchase warrant. Each full warrant is exercisable into one further share at a price of $0.27 per share for a period of 24 months. A cash finders’ fee for $2,520 was paid to Leede Financial Markets Ltd.; and 15,400 broker warrants with an exercise price of $0.27 for a period of twenty-four months were also issued to Leede Financial Markets Ltd. The fair value of these broker warrants was determined to be $2,903.

On December 14, 2015, Lexaria signed an investor relations contract with Radius Consulting Inc. for a fee of $2,500 and 55,000 common shares of Company valued at $9,500.

On April 15, 2016, pursuant to the agreement with Mr. John Docherty (Note 16), the Company issued 210,000 common shares valued at $21,000, for services rendered as the President of the Company.

58


On April 15, 2016, the Company closed a private placement of 750,000 units at a price of $0.08 per unit for gross proceeds of $60,000. Each unit consisted of one common share of the Company and one non-transferrable share purchase warrant, entitling the holder to purchase one additional common shareincluded in the capitalcost of the Company for a period of 18 months at an exercise price of $0.15 per share. The Company also issued 8,750 broker warrants to Haywood Securities Ltd. The broker warrants have a term of 18 months and are each exercisable into one common share of the Company at a price of $0.15. The fair value of these broker warrants was determined to be $805.goods sold.

On June 6, 2016, the Company closed a private placement of 700,000 units priced at $0.11 per unit for gross proceeds of $77,000. Each unit consisted of one common share of the Company and one-half of a non-transferrable share purchase warrant with each warrant entitling the holder to purchase one additional common share of the Company for a period of three years at an exercise price of $0.14 per share.

On July 28, 2016, pursuant to an agreement, in return for marketing, branding, and investor relations advisory services, the Company issued 250,000 common shares of the Company valued at $0.12 per share (Note 16).

On August 10, 2016, the Company closed a private placement by issuing 1,558,525 units at a price of $0.06 per unit for gross proceeds of $93,512. Each unit consisted of one common share of the Company and one non-transferable share purchase warrant entitling the holder to purchase one additional common share in the capital of the Company for a period of 24 months at an exercise price of $0.14 per share.

On August 31, 2016, the Company completed a private placement by issuing 3,266,666 units at a price of $0.06 per unit for gross proceeds of $196,000, of which $93,500 was collected during September and October 2016. Each unit consisted of one common share of the Company and one transferable share purchase warrant. Each full warrant is exercisable into one further share at a price of $0.14 per share for a period of 24 months. A cash finders’ fee for $1,200 was paid and 50,000 broker warrants with an exercise price of $0.14 for a period of twenty-four months were also issued. The fair value of these broker warrants was determined to be $5,397.

A continuity schedule for warrants is presented below:

      Weighted Average 
   Number of  Exercise Price 
   Warrants  $ 
 Balance, August 31, 2015 19,840,186  0.23 
 Expired (13,978,286) 0.22 
 Issued 6,274,341  0.15 
 Balance, August 31, 2016 12,136,241  0.18 
 Cancelled/Expired (1,004,150) 0.22 
 Exercised (10,322,025) 0.23 
 Issued 8,034,440  0.36 
 Balance, August 31, 2017 8,844,506  0.29 

The fair value of share purchase warrants granted as broker warrants, compensation units, and compensatory warrants, was estimated as of the date of the grant by using the Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following assumptions:

  August 31August 31
  20172016
 Expected volatility102% - 138%237% - 240%
 Risk-free interest rate0.65% - 1.27%0.74% - 0.95%
 Expected life0.46 - 2 years1.5 – 2 years
 Dividend yield0.00%0.00%
 Estimated fair value per option$0.09 - $0.20$0.09 - $0.19

59


A summary of warrants outstanding as of August 31, 2017 is presented below:

# of WarrantsWeightedWeighted
 AverageAverage
 RemainingExercise Price
 Contractual Life$
625,0000.04 years0.15
290,4000.28 years0.27
500,0000.36 years0.23
450,0000.95 years0.14
2,839,6661.00 years0.14
2,052,1401.59 years0.60
287,3001.59 years0.42
350,0001.76 years0.14
750,0004.11 years0.14
200,0001.80 years0.29
500,0000.95 years0.44
8,844,5061.34 years0.29

12.

Stock Options

 
42

The Company has established its 2014 Stock Option Plan whereby the board of directors may, from time to time, grant up to 3,850,000 (post forward stock split) stock options to directors, officers, employees, and consultants. Stock options granted must be exercised no later than five years from the date of grant or such lesser period as determined by the Company’s board of directors. The exercise price of an option is equal to or greater than the closing market price of the Company’s common shares on the day preceding the date of grant. The vesting terms of each grant are set by the board of directors.

Table of Contents

Fiscal 2017 Activity

On October 10, 2016, the Company granted 250,000 stock options to a consultant for business advisory services. The exercise price of the stock options is $0.14 per share, vesting immediately and expiring on October 10, 2018.

On June 2, 2017, the Company granted 200,000 stock options to an officer of the Company. The exercise price of the stock options is $0.37 per share, vesting immediately and expiring five years from the date of grant.

On June 21, 2017, the Company granted 300,000 stock options to a consultant, 100,000 vesting annually for 3 years, with an exercise price of $0.295 and expiring five years from the date of grant. The company also granted 100,000 options to consultants vesting immediately with an exercise price of $0.295 and expiring five years from the date of grant.

During the year ended August 31, 2017, the Company also recorded $113,044 of stock based compensation in Consulting on the Income Statement of which $93,969 pertained to the stock options granted during the period and $19,075 being the recognition of expense from previous grants amortized from prepaid expenses. In 2016 the Company recorded $92,270 of stock based compensation in Consulting and $29,745 in Investor Relations on the Income Statement.

60


Fiscal 2016 Activity

On September 16, 2015,11. Accounts Payable and Accrued Liabilities

 

 

August 31

 

 

August 31

 

 

 

2022

 

 

2021

 

 

 

$

 

 

$

 

Accounts Payable

 

 

 

 

 

 

Vendors payable

 

 

57,150

 

 

 

59,891

 

Sales tax payable

 

 

31,303

 

 

 

-

 

Accrued Liabilities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Corporate tax payable

 

 

-

 

 

 

1,055

 

Vendors payable

 

 

62,996

 

 

 

45,000

 

Total

 

 

151,449

 

 

 

105,946

 

12. Related Party Transactions

Related party transactions, Aug 31, 2022, ($Nil), Aug 31 2021, ($5,223 ) are included in accounts payable and represent expenses incurred in the ordinary course of business.

13. Revenues

 

 

August 31

2022

$

 

 

August 31

2021

$

 

B2B sales

 

 

113,438

 

 

 

383,179

 

Licensing Revenue

 

 

54,560

 

 

 

334,974

 

Research & Development

 

 

54,800

 

 

 

-

 

Other Revenue

 

 

32,599

 

 

 

4,585

 

 

 

 

255,397

 

 

 

722,738

 

The Company granted 110,000 stock optionsrecognized B2B product revenues of $113,438 (2021 - $383,179) that relate to a directorsales of our intermediate products for use by four B2B customers in their products. Licensing revenue consist of IP licensing fees for transfer of the Company.DehydraTECH technology in line with definitive agreements and also includes royalty fees. The exercise price ofCompany recognized $54,560 (2021 - $334,974) in licensing revenue during the stock options is $0.17, vesting immediately and expiring on September 16, 2020.year.

On April 15, 2016, the Company granted 300,000 to an officer of the Company. The exercise price of the stock options is $0.11 per share, vesting immediately and expiring on April 15, 2021.

On June 3, 2016, the Company granted 325,000 stock options to a consultant, vesting immediately, with an exercise price of $0.14 and expiring five years from the date of grant.14.Income Tax

A continuity schedule for stock options is presented below:

      Weighted Average 
   Number of Options  Exercise Price 
      $ 
 Balance, August 31, 2015 (vested and outstanding) 4,070,000  0.15 
 Expired (385,000) 0.32 
 Cancelled (935,000) 0.16 
 Granted 735,000  0.13 
 Balance, August 31, 2016 (vested and outstanding) 3,485,000  0.15 
 Exercised (1,014,125) 0.17 
 Granted 850,000  0.14 
 Balance, August 31, 2017 (outstanding) 3,320,875  0.15 
 Balance, August 31, 2017 (exercisable) 3,020,875  0.14 

The fair value of options granted was estimated as offollowing table reconciles the date ofincome tax benefit at the grant by using the Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following assumptions:

 August 31August 31
 20172016
Expected volatility98% - 108%240% - 241%
Risk-free interest rate0.83% - 1.78%1.22% - 1.62%
Expected life2 - 5 years5 years
Dividend yield0.00%0.00%
Estimated fair value per option$0.07 - $0.27$0.11 - $0.19

A summary ofU.S. Federal statutory rate to income tax benefit at the Company’s vested and outstanding stock optionseffective tax rates as at August 31, 2017 is presented below:2022 and 2021:

Number ofNumber of StockWeightedWeightedAggregate
Stock OptionsOptionsAverageAverageIntrinsic Value
 ExercisableRemainingExercise Price 
  Contractual Life$$
247,500247,5000.80 years0.0964,125
248,375248,3751.90 years0.2330,482
990,000990,0002.31 years0.10247,500
275,000275,0002.43 years0.0971,250
550,000550,0002.57 years0.09142,500
110,000110,0003.05 years0.1719,500
300,000300,0003.62 years0.1172,000
200,000200,0004.76 years0.37(4,000)
400,000100,0004.81 years0.3022,000
3,320,8753,020,8752.81 years0.15665,357

61



 

 

August 31

2022

 

 

August 31

2021

 

 

 

$

 

 

$

 

Loss before taxes

 

 

(7,383,653

)

 

 

(4,169,832)

Expected income tax recovery

 

 

(1,619,854

)

 

 

(800,952)

Non-deductible items

 

 

(280,155

)

 

 

(142,895)

Change in estimates

 

 

(44,867

)

 

 

(56,316)

Effect of changes in foreign and long-term tax rates

 

 

23,625

 

 

 

-

 

Change in valuation allowance

 

 

1,271,207

 

 

 

1,006,256

 

Total income taxes

 

 

-

 

 

 

6,093

 

13.

Revenues


   August 31  August 31 
   2017  2016 
   $  $ 
        
 Product sales 16,866  31,743 
 Licensing revenue (Note 9) 45,809  7,500 
 Freight revenue 964  1,149 
 Other revenue -  326 
   63,639  40,718 

The Company recognizes licensing revenue on a pro-rated basis over the term of the Licensing Agreement (Note 9) and additional licensing fees as they are earned. As of August 31 2017 the company had received all of the pre-defined Licensing payments to August 31 2017 for cash receipts of $50,000 of Licensing fees and $20,392 of additional fees. During the year ended August 31, 2017, $25,417 of the $50,000 was included (2016 $7,500) on a pro-rated basis and $20,392 (2016 $NIL) of additional fees as licensing revenue.

 
14.43

Related Party Transactions

Table of Contents

For the year ended August 31, 2017, the Company paid/accrued the following:


   August 31  August 31 
   2017  2016 
   $  $ 
        
 Management, consulting and accounting services:      
      C.A.B Financial Services (“CAB”)(1) 136,000  120,000 
      M&E Services Ltd. (“M&E”)(1) 54,963  30,794 
      Docherty Management Limited (“Docherty Management”)(1) 125,394  117,213 
      Company controlled by a director – consulting 48,000  8,000 
      BKB Management Ltd. (former CFO) -  44,767 
      Senior Vice President – Executive management consulting -  18,000 
   364,357  338,431 

(1)CAB is owned by the CEO of the Company, M&E is owned by the CFO of the Company, appointed June 1st 2017, and Docherty Management Limited (“Docherty Management”) is owned by the President of the Company.

  Common sharesFair valueCash
 Docherty Management (Note 11,16)(1)252,000$35,760$6,240
 Docherty Management (Note 11,16)(2)210,000$61,950$11,800
 CAB (Note 11,16)(2)210,000$61,950$11,800

(1) Issued in lieu of issuance of 300,000 common shares, as mutually agreed to between the parties.
(2) Issued in lieu of issuance of 250,000 common shares, as mutually agreed to between the parties.

62



Other transactions with related parties:

a) On July 25, 2016, the Company entered into a loan agreement with CAB for a principal amount of $50,000. During the year ended August 31, 2017, the Company repaid the full $50,000 principal to CAB and also paid $1,515 in interest.

b) During the year ended August 31, 2017, the Company sold $5,058 (2016 $NIL) of products to a director and an officer of the company and paid $1,341 in rent to an officer of the company.

Due to related parties:

As at August 31, 2017, $42,690 (August 31, 2016 - $331,371) was payable to related parties included in due to related parties.

The related party transactions are recorded at the exchange amount established and agreed to between the related parties.

15.

Segment Information

The Company’s operations involve the development and usage, including licensing, of its proprietary nutrient infusion Technology. Lexaria is centrally managed and its chief operating decision makers, being the president and the CEO, use the consolidated and other financial information supplemented by revenue information by category of alternative health consumer products and technology licensing to make operational decisions and to assess the performance of the Company. The company has identified two reportable segments: Intellectual Property Licensing and Consumer Products. Licensing revenues are significantly concentrated on a single licensee.


 IP LicensingConsumer ProductsCorporateConsolidated Total
External Revenue45,80917,830-63,639
CoGS-29,750-29,750
Operating Expenses360,256120,9351,482,1621,963,354
Segment Loss(314,447)(132,856)(1,482,162)(1,929,465)
Total Assets62,82769,0302,728,3212,860,178

16.

Commitments, Significant Contracts and Contingencies

Management and Service Agreements

As at August 31, 2017, the Company is party to the following contractual commitments:


PartyMonthly CommitmentExpiry Date
C.A.B Financial Services(1) (2)          $12,000November 30, 2018
Docherty Management Ltd.(1) (2)CAD $15,000March 1, 2018
M&E Services Ltd.(1)CAD   $8,000June 1, 2018
Corporate Development(3) (4)CAD   $4,000Month to Month
Advisory AgreementCAD   $4,000March 24, 2018
Investor relations and communications – Alex Blanchard Capital(1)CAD   $7,500December 19, 2017
Research & DevelopmentCAD   $3,854June 19, 2018

63



Revenue Incentive Milestones

(1)100,000 common shares issuable upon the Company achieving non-refundable revenues of $200,000 to any single customer in any consecutive 60-day period for the first 12 months of the contract, plus a further 50,000 common shares issuable upon achieving non-refundable revenues of $200,000 to any single customer in any consecutive 60-day period, during the 13th - 24th months of the contract. If the Company achieves non-refundable revenues of $500,000 in any fiscal quarter, a further 200,000 common shares may be issuable during the first 12 months of the contract and 100,000 common shares during the 13th - 24th months of the contract.

Intellectual Property Milestones

(2)During the term of the agreement, for each provisional patent application substantively devised and successfully created, written, and filed with the U.S. Patent Office for the Company’s Technology, 250,000 restricted common shares of the Company will be issuable.

Corporate Development Milestones

(3)For new customers sourced by the Consultant until July 10, 2017; for combined Lexaria Energy and ViPova products and including all combined sales efforts and/or technology licensing revenues, achieving non-refundable revenues of $200,000 to any single customer in any consecutive 60-day period would result in a restricted common share award of 100,000 Company shares (not achieved); and, from July 11, 2017, until July 10, 2018; a restricted common share award of 50,000 Company shares may be achieved; this clause is limited to one payment per customer during the 12-month period, but payable on each customer that meets these sales/licensing thresholds.

(4)For new customers sourced by the Consultant until July 10, 2017; for combined Lexaria Energy and ViPova products and including all combined sales efforts and/or technology licensing revenues, achieving non-refundable revenues of $500,000 in any fiscal quarter would result in a restricted common share award of 200,000 Company shares (not achieved); and, from July 11, 2017, until July 10, 2018; for combined Lexaria Energy and ViPova products and including all sales efforts, achieving non-refundable revenues of $500,000 in any fiscal quarter would result in a restricted common share award of 100,000 Company shares; this clause is limited to one payment per fiscal quarter.

17.

Income Tax

The following table reconciles the income tax benefit at the U.S. Federal statutory rate to income tax benefit at the Company’s effective tax rates as at August 31, 2017 and 2016:


   August 31  August 31 
   2017  2016 
   $  $ 
        
 Loss before taxes (1,933,473) (1,277,249)
 Expected income tax recovery (676,716) (447,037)
 Non-deductible items 242,716  101,040 
 Change in estimates (174,135) (897,713)
 Change in valuation allowance 608,216  1,243,710 
 Total income taxes -  - 

Deferred taxes reflect the tax effects of temporary differences between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities for financial reporting purposes. Deferred tax assets at August 31, 20172022 and 20162021 are comprised of the following:

64


   August 31  August 31 
   2017  2016 
   $  $ 
        
 Non-capital losses 4,567,920  3,959,704 
 Valuation allowance (4, 567,920) (3,959,704)
 Net deferred tax assets recognized -  - 

 

 

August 31

2022

$

 

 

August 31

2021

$

 

Non-capital losses

 

 

7,747,485

 

 

 

6,580,183

 

Marketable securities

 

 

118,175

 

 

 

14,270

 

Total unrecognized deferred tax assets

 

 

7,865,660

 

 

 

6,594,453

 

The Company has net operating loss carryforwardscarry-forwards of approximately $13,051,000$36,387,000 which may be carried forward to apply against future year income tax for U.S. tax purposes.

Year Amount 
2025 76,000 
2026 508,000 
2027 1,056,000 
2028 720,000 
2029 753,000 
2030 552,000 
2031 538,000 
2032 252,000 
2033 344,000 
2034 3,257,000 
2035 2,268,000 
2036 989,000 
2037 1,738,000 
  13,051,000 

Year

 

Amount

 

 

Canada

 

2026

 

 

 

 

 

-

 

2025

 

 

76,000

 

 

 

-

 

2026

 

 

508,000

 

 

 

-

 

2027

 

 

1,056,000

 

 

 

-

 

2028

 

 

720,000

 

 

 

-

 

2029

 

 

753,000

 

 

 

-

 

2030

 

 

552,000

 

 

 

-

 

2031

 

 

538,000

 

 

 

-

 

2032

 

 

252,000

 

 

 

-

 

2033

 

 

344,000

 

 

 

-

 

2034

 

 

3,257,000

 

 

 

-

 

2035

 

 

1,934,000

 

 

 

-

 

2036

 

 

1,150,000

 

 

 

-

 

2037

 

 

1,857,000

 

 

 

-

 

2038

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

2039

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

2040

 

 

-

 

 

 

270,000

2041

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

2042

 

 

-

 

 

 

380,000

 

Indefinite

 

 

23,390,000

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total

 

 

36,387,000

 

 

 

650,000

15. Common Shares and Warrants

Fiscal 2022 Activity

During the year ended August 31, 2022, the Company issued 224,299 restricted shares valued at $1,200,000 for payment of contracted services. We did not issue any warrants, no warrants were exercised, and 25,292 warrants expired.

A summary of share issuances for the year ended August 31, 2022, is presented below:

Type of Issuance

 

Number of

Shares

 

 

Total Value

$

 

Warrant exercise

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

Private placement

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

Per agreements(1)

 

 

224,499

 

 

 

1,200,000

 

 

 

 

224,499

 

 

 

1,200,000

 

(1) The Company awarded restricted common shares as required by consulting contracts. 

18.

Subsequent Events

 
44a)

On September 15th, 2017, the Company issued 625,000 shares of its common stock from the exercise of warrants previously granted for proceeds of $93,750. All warrants were exercised by third parties who are neither officers nor directors of the Company.

Table of Contents

Presented below is a continuity schedule for warrants:

 

 

Number of

warrants

 

 

Weighted

average

exercise

price $

 

Balance August 31, 2020

 

 

471,608

 

 

 

16.77

 

Cancelled/Expired

 

 

(44,161)

 

 

67.50

 

Exercised

 

 

(610,189)

 

 

6.58

 

Issued

 

 

2,630,017

 

 

 

6.58

 

Balance August 31, 2021

 

 

2,447,275

 

 

 

8.00

 

Cancelled/Expired

 

 

(25,292)

 

 

4.57

 

Balance August 31, 2022

 

 

2,421,983

 

 

 

8.04

 

The fair value of share purchase warrants granted as compensation units, and compensatory warrants, was estimated as of the date of the grant by using the Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following assumptions:

 

 

August 31

2022

 

 

August 31

2021

 

Expected volatility

 

 

-

 

 

 

103%

Risk-free interest rate

 

 

-

 

 

 

0.16%

Expected life

 

 

-

 

 

3 years

 

Dividend yield

 

-

%

 

 

0%

Estimated fair value per warrant

 

 

-

 

 

$6.51

 

Presented below is a summary of warrants outstanding as of August 31, 2022:

Number of Warrants

 

 

Weighted Average Remaining

Contractual Life

 

Weighted Average Exercise Price $

 

 

60,798

 

 

3.16 years

 

 

36.00

 

 

7,500

 

 

0.18 years

 

 

24.00

 

 

317,190

 

 

2.65 years

 

 

10.50

 

 

116,667

 

 

1.63-2.68 years

 

 

9.00

 

 

200,000

 

 

1.63 years

 

 

7.00

 

 

1,719,828

 

 

3.37 years

 

 

6.58

 

 

2,421,983

 

 

3.04 years

 

 

8.04

 

Fiscal 2021 Activity

On January 11, 2021, the Company filed an amendment and restatement of its articles of incorporation to effectuate a 1-for-30 reverse stock split of the issued and outstanding share of common stock of the Company.

During the year ended August 31, 2021, the Company closed an underwritten public offering for an aggregate total of 2,102,856 units priced at $5.25. Each unit consists of one common share and one share purchase warrant entitling the holder to acquire one common share, for a period of five years, at $6.58 per share. The Company paid fees of $1,568,499 and issued 227,161 broker warrants with a term of 24 months, each exercisable into one common share at $6.58 per share. The net proceeds of the offering were $9,471,497 after deducting underwriters discount, fees and expenses.

During the year ended August 31, 2021, the Company issued 610,189 common shares on the exercise of warrants for proceeds of $4,015,043.

The Company granted 300,000 warrants with an exercise price of $9.00 pursuant to consulting agreements in fiscal 2021. Using the Black-Scholes pricing model, the warrants were valued at $785,895 and were recorded as a consulting expense. Subsequent to the grant, 200,000 warrants were repriced at $7.00.

16. Stock Options

The Company established an Equity Incentive Plan whereby our Board may grant up to 261,290 stock options to directors, officers, employees, and consultants. During the Company’s 2021 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, shareholders voted in favour of increasing the number of allowable stock options by an additional 249,143 options. The aggregate number of shares issuable under the Equity Incentive Plan is 510,433 shares, representing 10% of the Company’s issued share capital at the time of the 2021 Annual General Meeting.

 
45b)

On October 31st, 2017, the Company announced it received a Notice of Allowance from the United States Patent and Trademark Office (“USPTO”) for the use of its technology as a delivery platform for all cannabinoids including THC; fat soluble vitamins; non steroidal anti-inflammatory pain medications (“NSAIDs”); and nicotine. The patent application number is 15/225,799, “Food and Beverage Compositions Infused With Lipophilic Active Agents and Methods of Use Thereof”.

Table of Contents

Stock options granted must be exercised no later than five years from the date of grant as determined by our Board. The exercise price of an option is equal to or greater than the closing market price of the Company’s common shares on the day preceding the date of grant. Vesting terms are set by our Board. The estimated fair value of each stock option award is estimated on the date of grant using Black-Scholes option pricing model.

Fiscal 2022 Activity

The Company granted the following stock options in the year ending August 31, 2022:

 

 

Quantity

 

 

 

Exercise Price $

 

Life (Years)

 

 

81,800

 

 

 

6.23

 

5

 

 

36,700

 

 

 

3.39

 

5

 

 

103,500

 

 

 

2.91

 

5

August 31, 2022

 

222,000

 

Average

 

4.21

 

5

Fiscal 2021 Activity

The Company granted the following stock options in the year ending August 31, 2021:

 

 

Quantity

 

 

 

Exercise Price $

 

Life (Years)

 

 

3,400

 

 

 

4.80

 

5

 

 

12,000

 

 

 

5.04

 

5

 

 

43,500

 

 

 

5.31

 

5

 

 

26,000

 

 

 

5.83

 

 

August 31, 2021

 

84,900

 

Average

 

5.41

 

5

During the year ended August 31, 2021 87,935 previously granted options at a strike price of $9.60 were cancelled and re-issued at $7.08.

A continuity schedule for stock options is presented below:

 

 

Options

 

 

Weighted

Average

Exercise

Price $

 

 

Weighted

Average

Remaining

Contractual

Term (Years)

 

 

Aggregate

Intrinsic

Value $

 

Balance August 31, 2020

 

 

171,604

 

 

 

11.17

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Expired/Cancelled

 

 

(50,344)

 

 

10.76

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Granted

 

 

161,600

 

 

 

5.41

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Balance August 31, 2021

 

 

206,170

 

 

 

8.90

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Expired/Cancelled

 

 

(3,334)

 

 

9.60

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Granted

 

 

222,000

 

 

 

4.21

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Balance August 31, 2022 (Outstanding)

 

 

424,836

 

 

 

6.45

 

 

 

3.69

 

 

 

5,175

 

Balance August 31, 2022 (Exercisable)

 

 

401,333

 

 

 

6.57

 

 

 

3.66

 

 

 

5,175

 

The intrinsic value of stock option awards that vested during the fiscal year represents the value of the Company’s closing stock price on the last trading day of the fiscal year in excess of the exercise price multiplied by the number of vested options.

 
46c)

On November 2nd, 2017, the Company announced it acquired 100% ownership interest in its majority owned subsidiary PoViva Tea, LLC. The Company previously owned a 51% interest in PoViva Tea, LLC and acquired the remaining 49% interest. Compensation was US$70,000, a waiver on certain debts, and a 5%, 20-year royalty on net profits of ViPova TeaTMtea, coffee, and hot chocolate sales. No Lexaria stock or options were issued.

Table of Contents

The fair value of options granted was estimated as of the date of the grant by using the Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following assumptions:

 

 

August 31

2022

 

 

August 31

2021

 

Expected volatility

 

98% –119

 

133% –134

Risk-free interest rate

 

0.78% - 3.30

 

0.42% – 0.85

Expected life

 

5 years

 

 

5 years

 

Dividend yield

 

 

0

 

 

 

0

 

Estimated fair value per option

 

$2.25 - $5.10

 

 

$4.00 – $4.86

 

17. Commitments, Significant Contracts and Contingencies

Right of Use Assets - Operating Lease

Corporate offices and R&D lab space is leased in Kelowna, British Columbia, Canada until November 15, 2023, with an optional five-year extension. In addition to minimum lease payments, the lease requires us to pay property taxes and operating costs which are subject to annual adjustments.

 

 

August 31,

2022

 

 

August 31,

2021

 

 

 

$

 

 

$

 

Right of use assets - operating leases:

 

 

91,041

 

 

 

126,920

 

Amortization

 

 

(38,597)

 

 

(35,879)

Total lease assets

 

 

52,444

 

 

 

91,041

 

Liabilities:

 

 

89,393

 

 

 

125,431

 

Lease payments

 

 

(44,600)

 

 

(43,950)

Interest accretion

 

 

5,195

 

 

 

7,912

 

Total lease liabilities

 

 

49,988

 

 

 

89,393

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Operating lease cost 

 

$52,444

 

 

$91,041

 

Operating cash flows for lease

 

$44,599

 

 

$43,950

 

Remaining lease term

 

1.17 Years

 

 

2.1 Years

 

Discount rate

 

 

7.25%

 

 

7.25%

Pursuant to the terms of the Company’s lease agreements in effect at August 31, 2022, the following table summarizes the Company’s maturities of operating lease liabilities:

 

 

 

$

 

2023

 

 

44,815

 

2024

 

 

7,469

 

Thereafter

 

 

-

 

Total lease payments

 

 

52,284

 

Less: imputed interest

 

 

(2,296)

Present value of operating lease liabilities

 

 

49,988

 

Less: current obligations under leases

 

 

(42,587)

Total

 

 

7,401

 

18. Segment Information

The Company’s operations involve the development and usage, including licensing, of DehydraTECH. Lexaria is centrally managed and its chief operating decision makers, being the President and the CEO, use the consolidated and other financial information supplemented by revenue information by category of business-to-business product production and technology licensing to make operational decisions and to assess the performance of the Company. The Company has identified two reportable segments: Intellectual Property Licensing and B2B Production. Licensing revenues are significantly concentrated on three licensees.

For year ended August 31, 2022

 

IP

Licensing

 

 

B2B

Product

 

R & D

 

Corporate

 

 

Consolidated

Total

 

 

$

 

 

$

 

&

 

$

 

 

$

External revenue

 

 

54,560

 

 

 

113,438

 

54,800 

 

 

32,599

 

 

 

255,397

Cost of goods sold

 

 

 

 

 

 

(71,841

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(71,841)

Operating expenses

 

 

(307,809

)

 

 

(731,427

)

(1,842,675 

)

 

(4,685,298

)

 

 

(7,567,209)

Segment loss

 

 

(253,249

)

 

 

(689,830

)

(1,787,875 

)

 

(4,652,699

)

 

 

(7,383,653)

Total assets

 

 

161,307

 

 

 

205,956

 

247,345 

 

 

7,219,319

 

 

 

7,833,927

 
47d)

On November 8th, 2017, the Company issued 419,250 shares of its common stock from the exercise of options and warrants previously granted for proceeds of $69,736. All options and warrants were exercised by third parties who are neither officers nor directors of the Company.

Table of Contents

For year ended August 31, 2021

 

IP

Licensing

$

 

 

B2B

Product

 $

 

 

Corporate

$

 

 

Consolidated

Total

$

 

External revenue

 

 

334,974

 

 

 

297,279

 

 

 

90,485

 

 

��

722,738

 

Cost of goods sold

 

 

-

 

 

 

(175,346)

 

 

-

 

 

 

(175,346)

Operating expenses

 

 

(1,864,527)

 

 

(1,325,809)

 

 

(1,521,187)

 

 

(4,711,523)

Segment loss

 

 

(1,529,553)

 

 

(1,203,876)

 

 

(1,430,702)

 

 

(4,164,131)

Total assets

 

 

526,486

 

 

 

62,291

 

 

 

12,678,040

 

 

 

13,266,817

 

Capital Asset by Region

 

Cost

US

 

 

Additions

US

 

 

Net

Balance

US

 

 

 

Cost

Canada

 

Additions

Canada

 

Net

Balance

Canada

 

 

Net

Balance

Total

 

Year Ended August 31, 2022

 

$

 

 

$

 

 

$

 

 

 

$

$

 

$

 

 

$

 

Leasehold Improvements

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

259,981

 

-

 

 

65,296

 

 

 

65,296

 

Computers

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

63,964

 

6,817

 

 

9,357

 

 

 

9,357

 

Furniture Fixtures Equipment

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

31,126

 

-

 

 

8,288

 

 

 

8,288

 

Lab Equipment

 

 

98,050

 

 

 

42,375

 

 

 

100,031

 

 

 

193,185

 

-

 

 

132,533

 

 

 

232,564

 

 

 

 

98,050

 

 

 

42,375

 

 

 

100,031

 

 

 

548,256

 

6,817

 

 

215,474

 

 

 

315,505

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Year Ended August 31, 2021

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Leasehold Improvements

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

259,981

 

 -

 

 

119,333

 

 

 

119,333

 

Computers

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

63,964

 

 -

 

 

12,414

 

 

 

12,414

 

Furniture Fixtures Equipment

 

 

3,094

 

 

 

(3,904

)

 

 

-

 

 

 

31,126

 

 -

 

 

14,706

 

 

 

14,706

 

Lab Equipment

 

 

98,050

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

69,580

 

 

 

193,185

 

 -

 

 

152,180

 

 

 

221,760

 

 

 

 

101,144

 

 

 

(3,904

)

 

 

69,580

 

 

 

548,256

 

 -

 

 

298,633

 

 

 

368,213

 

19. Discontinued Operations

On November 19, 2020, the Company entered a definitive asset sale agreement through its wholly-owned subsidiary Lexaria CanPharm ULC to sell certain assets for gross proceeds of C$3,850,000.

The sale closed on December 10, 2020, with the Company receiving C$350,000 in cash, 6,031,363 restricted common shares at a fair value price of C$500,000 as the first of three required equity-based payments, a promissory note having a principal amount of C$2,000,000 and bearing interest at the rate of 10% per annum. The promissory note was included at its nominal value of $Nil and any future receipts of interest and principal will be recorded as income in the period. Pursuant to the terms of the transaction the Company will receive equity-based payments in two tranches of C$500,000 in common shares of Hill Street Beverage Company issued at eight months and sixteen months after the closing date.

The Company received the second tranche of shares on August 9, 2021 as per the sale agreement. Based on the agreed terms, the value of the 5,882,353 shares issued was $390,533 (C$500,000). An over-allotment of 1,693,405 shares with a value of $122,426 (C$143,939) were received at this time and was applied to the future issuance of the third tranche with a reduction in the outstanding amount receivable. The thirdand final tranche of 4,188,948 shares was received on April 8, 2022.

The gain on the transaction is presented below:

Gain on asset disposal

$

Book value of assets sold

-

Cash consideration

273,373

Shares received

1,249,331

Promissory note

-

1,522,704

 
48
e)

Table of Contents

The financial results of the group of assets sold are presented as income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of income taxes in our consolidated statement of income. The following table presents financial results of the assets:

On November 22nd, 2017, the Company issued 427,687 shares

August 31

2021

$

Revenue

3,000

Operating expenses

(25,000)

Net income (loss)

(22,000)

The following table presents cash flows of discontinued operations:

August 31

2021

$

Cash flows used in discontinued operating activities

Net income

(22,000)

Change in working capital

2,500

Net cash provided by (used in) discontinued operating activities

3,000

Net cash provided by (used in) discontinued operations

3,000

20. Subsequent Events

On September 2, 2022, Catherine Turkel, PharmD, PhD was appointed to our Board and was awarded 3,400 options at a strike price of $3.04, vesting immediately with a 5 year term and a value of $7,757 using the Black Scholes pricing model.

Subsequent to the year ended August 31, 2022, the Company issued 41,200 stock options to the Company’s independent directors at a strike price of $1.96, vesting immediately with a 5 year term and a value of $61,109 using the Black Scholes pricing model.

On November 5, 2022, 7,500 warrants with a strike price of $24.00 expired.

49

Table of its common stock from the exercise of warrants previously granted for proceeds of $129,416. All options and warrants were exercised by third parties who are neither officers nor directors of the Company.

Contents

65


Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements Withwith Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure

During the year ended August 31, 2022, our principal accountants indicated that they have declined to stand for re-election after the completion of the current audit of our fiscal year 2022. During the past two years there have been no adverse opinions, disclaimer of opinion or qualification or modification as to uncertainty, audit scope or accounting principles. The decision to change accountants was recommended by the Company’s Audit Committee and approved by our Board. There were no disagreements related to accounting principles or practices, financial statement disclosure, internal controls or auditing scope or procedure during the two fiscal years and their respective interim periods. The Company changed its registered public auditing firm for its fiscal year ending August 31, 2016 from MNP LLP (the “Former Auditor”) to Davidson and Company, LLP. There were no reservations nor any modified opinions expressed in the Former Auditor’s reports for the year ended August 31, 2015 or any of the previous fiscal years. The change in the Company’s public auditing firm was approved by the Company’s Audit Committee and the Board of Directors. There were no reportable events between the Company and the Former Auditors.

Item 9A. Controls and Procedures

Management’s Report on Disclosure Controls and Procedures

We maintain disclosure controls and procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in our reports filed under theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934,, as amended, is recorded, processed, summarized, and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission'sSECs rules and forms, and that suchforms. This information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our president and chief executive officerChief Executive Officer (also our principal executive officer)Principal Executive Officer) and our chief financial officerChief Financial Officer (also our principal financialPrincipal Financial and accounting officer)Accounting Officer) to allow for timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

As of August 31, 2017,2022, the end of our fiscal year covered by this report, we carried out an evaluation under the supervision and with the participation of our PresidentCEO and chief executive officer and chief financial officer (also our principal executive and financial reporting and accounting officers),CFO of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures. Based on the foregoing, our president, chief executive officerCEO and the chief financial officerCFO concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of the end of the period covered by this annual report.

Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting

Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting. Responsibility, estimatesEstimates and judgments by management are required to assess the expected benefits and related costs of control procedures. The objectives of internal control include providing management with reasonable, but not absolute, assurance that assets are safeguarded against loss from unauthorized use or disposition, and that transactions are executed in accordance with management’s authorization and recorded properly to permit the preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. Our managementManagement has assessed the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of August 31, 2017.2022. In making this assessment, our management used the criteria set forth in the report entitled “Internal Control — Integrated Framework” published by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (“COSO”) inInternal Control-Integrated Framework(2013 framework). Our managementManagement has concluded that as of August 31, 2017,2022 our internal control over financial reporting is effective in providing reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with US generally accepted accounting principles.GAAP. Our management reviewed the results of their assessment with our BoardBoard.

Inherent Limitations on Effectiveness of Directors.Controls

This annual report does not include an attestation report of our company’s registered public accounting firm regarding internal control over financial reporting. Management’s report was not subject to attestation by our Company’s registered public accounting firm pursuant to temporary rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission that permit our Company to provide only management’s report in this annual report.

Inherent limitations on effectiveness of controls

Internal control over financial reporting has inherent limitations which include but is not limited to the use of independent professionals for advice and guidance, interpretation of existing and/or changing rules and principles, segregation of management duties, scale of organization, and personnel factors. Internal control over financial reportingIt is a process which involves human diligence and compliance and ismay be subject to lapses in judgment and breakdowns resulting from human failures. Internal control over financial reporting alsoIt can be circumvented by collusion or improper management override. Because of its inherent limitations, internalInternal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements on a timely basis, however thesebasis. These inherent limitations are known features of the financial reporting process and it is possible to design into the process safeguards to reduce, though not eliminate, this risk. Therefore, even those systemsthese risks. Systems determined to be effective can provide only reasonable assuranceassurances with respect to financial statement preparation and presentation. Projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

66


Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

The fundamental controls and control processes remained consistent with prior years during the year ended August 31, 2022. In April 2021, the former CFO Mr. Allan Spissinger was replaced by the former controller, Mr. Greg Downey which required some of our controls and controls processes to be temporarily revised and updated based on personnel changes within the Company. There have been no changes in our internal controls over financial reporting that occurred during the year ended August 31, 20172022, that have materially or are reasonably likely to materially affect our internal controls over financial reporting.

Item 9B. Other Information

None

None.

50

Table of Contents

PART III

Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance

All directors of our companyCompany hold office until the next annual meeting of the security holders or until their successors have been elected and qualified. The officers of our companyCompany are appointed by our board of directorsBoard and hold office until their death, resignation, or removal from office. Our directors and executive officers their ages, positions held, and duration as such, are as follows:


Name


Position Held with our Company


Age

Age

Date FirstElected

Or Appointed

Date of
Resignation

Christopher Bunka

Chairman, Chief Executive Officer, and Director

56

October

61

Oct. 26, 2006
February 14, 2007

-

John Docherty

President and Director

47

April

53

Apr. 15, 2015

-

Gregory Downey

April 29, 2016
Allan SpissingerInterim

Chief Financial Officer

48

June 1, 2017

62

Apr. 15, 2021

-

Nicholas Baxter

Director

64

Director

July

68

Jul. 8, 2011

-

Ted McKenchnieMcKechnie

Director

70

Director

September

75

Sept. 16, 2015

-

Al Reese, Jr.

Director

73

Jan 14, 2021

-

Catherine Turkel

Director

62

Sept. 2, 2022

-

Business Experience

The following is a brief account of the educationbusiness and businesseducation experience of each current director and executive officer during the past five years, indicating each person'sperson’s principal occupation during the period, and the name and principal business of the organization by which he was employed.period.

Mr. Christopher Bunka – Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and Director

Mr. Bunka has been Chairman of the Board and CEO since 2006 and was primarily responsible for the corporate pivot from older business activities to bioscience. Mr. Bunka is a serial entrepreneur and has been involved in several private and public companies since the late 1980’s. He was well known for more than a decade as a part-time business commentator in print and radio, as well as an author. He has extensive experience in the capital markets, corporate governance, project acquisition and corporate finance. He is a named inventor on someseveral of Lexaria’s pending patents.

67


Since 1988, Mr. Bunka has been the CEO of CAB Financial Services Ltd., a private holding company located in Kelowna, BC, Canada. He is a venture capitalist and corporate consultant.

Mr. Bunka was formerly Chairman/CEO of Enertopia Corp, (symbol ENRT-OTC) but resigned in 2013. Mr. Bunka was formerly a director of Defiance Capital Corp., (symbol DEF-TSXV) a Canadian resource company, but resigned in 2014.

Mr. John Docherty – President and Director

Mr. Docherty was appointed President of Lexaria effective April 15, 2015. Prior to Lexaria Mr. Docherty was former President and Chief Operating officerOfficer of Helix BioPharma Corp. (TSX: HBP), where he led the company’s pharmaceutical development programs for its plant and recombinantly derived therapeutic protein product candidates.

Mr. Docherty is a senior operations and management executive with over 20 years experience in the pharmaceutical and biopharmaceutical sectors. He has worked with large multinational companies and emerging, private and publicly held start-ups. At Helix, Mr. Docherty was also instrumental in the areas of investor/stakeholder relations, capital raising, capital markets development, strategic partnering, regulatory authority interactions and media relations, and herelations. He also served as a management member of its board of directors. Prior to this,Previously, Mr. Docherty was President and a board member of PharmaDerm Laboratories Ltd., a Canadian drug delivery company that developed unique microencapsulation formulation technologies for use with a range of active compounds.

Mr. Docherty has also held positions with companies such as Astra Pharma Inc., Nu-Pharm Inc. and PriceWaterhouseCoopers’ former global pharmaceutical industry consulting practice. He is a named inventor on issued and pending patents and he has a M.Sc. in pharmacology and a B.Sc. in Toxicology from the University of Toronto.

He has served as a director of Lexaria since April 29, 2016.

Mr. Allan SpissingerGregory Downey Interim Chief Financial Officer

Prior to concentrating on finance and accounting,

Mr. Spissinger worked within the Informational Technologies (IT) sector for over a decade; specializing in corporate IT infrastructure and software development projects. Mr. SpissingerDowney joined the auditCompany was appointed Chief Financial Officer in April 2021 having joined the Company as Controller in January 2019 as Controller. Mr. Downey brings over 35 years of diverse financial experience in the mining, oil and assurance department at PricewaterhouseCoopers (PwC) where hegas, manufacturing, construction, and in the public sector as well as providing business advisory and financial accounting services to several mid-sized organizations. In addition, Mr. Downey has a wide range of executive corporate experience having acted as the Chief Financial Officer and director of public companies. Mr. Downey obtained his Certified Management Accountant (CMA) designation in 1992 and is a member of the Chartered Professional AccountantAccountants (CPA) designation focusing on financial reporting and Sarbanes-Oxley (SOX) compliance in the following sectors: resources, manufacturing and technologies. Mr. Spissinger joined Lexaria in September 2014 as a corporate controller. His positive mentorship, excellent communication and extensive leadership skills have enabled him to successfully manage a variety of private businesses for over 20 years.British Columbia.

Mr. Nicholas Baxter - Director

Mr. Baxter was appointed as a member onof the board of directors of Lexaria Corp. in 2009. Mr. Baxter received a Bachelor of Science (Honours) from the University of Liverpool in 1975 and has worked on oil & gas projects in many areas of the world. Since the 1980’s, he has worked with companies in the public markets both in the U.K. and in Canada. Mr. Baxter brings extensive real-world experience as a board member.

Mr. Ted McKechnie – Director

Mr. McKechnie is a well-recognized thought leader in the Canadian food industry. In the past, Mr. McKechnie was president of Maple Leaf Foods, an owner and senior executive at Humpty Dumpty Snack Foods and a senior leader at Pepsi Co. After a distinguished career as an executive and marketer specializing in food manufacturing, he now focuses on moving the Canadian food sector into the future. BesidesAside from being the chairman of Food Starter’s board, Mr. McKechnie is also the Chairman/CEO of The Davies Group and William Davies Consulting Inc. Mr. McKechnieHe is also a chairman of the board for Advanced Technology For Food Manufacturing, and serves on the Director of Lexaria Bioscience Corporation.

68


Board Of Governors for St Jerome’s University. Mr. McKechnie is often called upon by think tanks, the government and industry leaders to offer insights on how to grow the food sector and add more value to the Canadian economy.

51

Table of Contents

Mr. Al Reese Jr. - Director

Mr. Reese has over 40 years experience in public and private businesses including as CFO of a formerly Nasdaq-listed energy company where he arranged finance transactions totalling over $10 billion dollars during his 20-year tenure. Mr. Reese was a Director and Chairman of the Audit Committee of a community bank in Texas for ten years until such time as it was acquired by a larger banking group in 2018. He currently serves as an Independent Director and Chairman of the Audit Committee for a privately held insurance company headquartered in The Woodlands, Texas. He has directed over 50 acquisitions and financings from as small as a few hundred thousand dollars to multibillion dollar transactions in both the domestic and international arenas. He has directed or participated in numerous due diligence examinations, both domestic and foreign and has held the responsibility for integrating the finance, accounting and managerial practices for acquisitions and dispositions in both domestic and foreign operations in both public and private companies.

Mr. Reese is a Certified Public Accountant (1974) and received his Bachelor of Business Administration degree from Texas A&M University in 1971, and his MBA from University of Houston in 1977.

Ms. Catherine C. Turkel – Director

Ms. Turkel, PharmD, PhD has more than 20 years’ experience as an executive in start-up and mid-size pharma/biotech companies. She was Founder and CEO of Nezee Therapeutics, and served as President and R&D head at Novus Therapeutics (renamed Eledon Pharmaceuticals – Nasdaq: ELDN). She currently acts as an independent Board Director at Object Pharma (private) and Prostate Cancer Research (nonprofit; member of the Translational Scientific Advisory Committee) and is a Dean Advisor at Chapman University School of Pharmacy.

Dr. Turkel has formulated registration & commercial strategic plans and has led global development programs for pharmaceutical and biologic treatments from phase 1 through phase 4 related to Neurosciences, Pain, Cardiovascular, Psychiatry, Rare Diseases, Ophthalmology, Aesthetics, Urology and Otology therapeutic areas. Dr. Turkel designed and led Allergan’s (now AbbVie -NYSE: ABBV) pioneering BOTOX® Chronic Migraine registration program, generating revenue of more than a billion dollars.

Family Relationships

There are no family relationships among any of our directorsofficers or officers.directors.

Involvement in Certain Legal Proceedings

None of our directors, executive officers, promoters, or control persons has been involved in any of the following events during the past five years:

1.   A petition under the Federal bankruptcy laws or any state insolvency law was filed by or against, or a receiver, fiscal agent or similar officer was appointed by a court for the business or property of such person, or any partnership in which he was a general partner at or within two years before the time of such filing, or any corporation or business association of which he was an executive officer at or within two years before the time of such filing;

2.   Such person was convicted in a criminal proceeding or is a named subject of a pending criminal proceeding (excluding traffic violations and other minor offenses);

3.   Such person was

1)

A petition under the Federal bankruptcy laws or any state insolvency law was filed by or against, or a receiver, fiscal agent or similar officer was appointed by a court for the business or property of such person, or any partnership in which he was a general partner at or within two years before the time of such filing, or any corporation or business association of which he was an executive officer at or within two years before the time of such filing.

2)

A conviction in a criminal proceeding or is a named subject of a pending criminal proceeding (excluding traffic violations and other minor offenses).

3)

The subject of any order, judgment, or decree, not subsequently reversed, suspended, or vacated, of any court of competent jurisdiction, permanently or temporarily enjoining him from, or otherwise limiting, the following activities:

i.

Acting as a futures commission merchant, introducing broker, commodity trading advisor, commodity pool operator, floor broker, leverage transaction merchant, any other person regulated by the Commodity Futures Trading Commission, or an associated person of any of the foregoing, or as an investment adviser, underwriter, broker or dealer in securities, or as an affiliated person, director or employee of any investment company, bank, savings and loan association or insurance company, or engaging in or continuing any conduct or practice in connection with such activity, or

ii.

Engaging in any type of business practice; or

iii.

Engaging in any activity in connection with the purchase or sale of any security or commodity or in connection with any violation of Federal or State securities laws or Federal commodities laws;laws.

52

Table of Contents

4.   Such person was the subject of any order, judgment or decree, not subsequently reversed, suspended or vacated, of any Federal or State authority barring, suspending or otherwise limiting for more than 60 days the right of such person to engage in any activity described in paragraph (f)(3)(i) of this section, or to be associated with persons engaged in any such activity;

5.   Such person was found by a court of competent jurisdiction in a civil action or by the Commission to have violated any Federal or State securities law, and the judgment in such civil action or finding by the Commission has not been subsequently reversed, suspended, or vacated;

6.   Such person was found by a court of competent jurisdiction in a civil action or by the Commodity Futures Trading Commission to have violated any Federal commodities law, and the judgment in such civil action or finding by the Commodity Futures Trading Commission has not been subsequently reversed, suspended or vacated;

7.   Such person was

4)

The subject of any order, judgment, or decree, not subsequently reversed, suspended, or vacated, of any Federal or State authority barring, suspending or otherwise limiting for more than 60 days the right of such person to engage in any activity described in paragraph (f)(3)(i) of this section, or to be associated with persons engaged in any such activity.

5)

Found by a court of competent jurisdiction in a civil action or by the SEC to have violated any Federal or State securities law, and the judgment in such civil action or finding by the SEC has not been subsequently reversed, suspended, or vacated.

6)

Found by a court of competent jurisdiction in a civil action or by the Commodity Futures Trading Commission to have violated any Federal commodities law, and the judgment in such civil action or finding by the Commodity Futures Trading Commission has not been subsequently reversed, suspended, or vacated.

7)

The subject of, or a party to, any Federal or State judicial or administrative order, judgment, decree, or finding, not subsequently reversed, suspended, or vacated, relating to an alleged violation of:

i.

Any Federal or State securities or commodities law or regulation; or

69



ii.

Any law or regulation respecting financial institutions or insurance companies including, but not limited to, a temporary or permanent injunction, order of disgorgement or restitution, civil money penalty or temporary or permanent cease-and-desist order, or removal or prohibition order; or

iii.

Any law or regulation prohibiting mail or wire fraud or fraud in connection with any business entity;entity.

8)

The subject of, or a party to, any sanction or order, not subsequently reversed, suspended or vacated, of any self-regulatory organization (as defined in Section 3(a)(26) of the Exchange Act (15 U.S.C. 78c(a)(26))), any registered entity (as defined in Section 1(a)(29) of the Commodity Exchange Act (7 U.S.C. 1(a)(29))), or any equivalent exchange, association, entity or organization that has disciplinary authority over its members or persons associated with a member.

8.   Such person was the subject of, or a party to, any sanction or order, not subsequently reversed, suspended or vacated, of any self-regulatory organization (as defined in Section 3(a)(26) of the Exchange Act (15 U.S.C. 78c(a)(26))), any registered entity (as defined in Section 1(a)(29) of the Commodity Exchange Act (7 U.S.C. 1(a)(29))), or any equivalent exchange, association, entity or organization that has disciplinary authority over its members or persons associated with a member.

Compliance withDelinquent Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934Reports

Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 requires our executive officers and directors and persons who own more than 10% of our common stock to file with the Securities and Exchange Commission initial statements of beneficial ownership, reports of changes in ownership and annual reports concerning their ownership of our common stock and other equity securities, on Forms 3, 4 and 5 respectively. Executive officers, directors and greater than 10% shareholders are required by the SEC regulations to furnish us with copies of all Section 16(a) reports that they file.

Based solely on our review of the copies of such forms received by us, or written representations from certain reporting persons, we believe that during fiscal year ended August 31, 2017,2022, all filing requirements applicable to our officers, directors, and beneficial owners of greater than 10% percent beneficial owners were complied with.

Code of Ethics

We adopted a Code of Ethics applicable to our senior financial officers and certain other finance executives, which is a "code“code of ethics"ethics” as defined by applicable rules of the SEC. Our Code of Ethics is attached as an exhibit to our Form SB-2 filed on September 20, 2007. If we make any amendments to our Code of Ethics other than technical, administrative, or other non-substantive amendments, or grant any waivers, including implicit waivers, from a provision of our Code of Ethics to our chief executive officer, chief financial officer,Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, or certain other finance executives, we will disclose the nature of the amendment or waiver, its effective date and to whom it applies in a Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC.

Board and Committee Meetings

Our board of directorsBoard held oneseven formal meetingmeetings and several informal meetings during the year ended August 31, 2017.2022. All proceedings of the board of directors taken at a formal meeting were conductedevidenced by way of minutes taken at such meetings. All other matters approved by our Board outside of any formal meeting were evidenced by resolutions consented to in writing by all the directors and filed with the minutes of the proceedings of the directors. Such resolutions consented to in writing by the directors entitled to vote on that resolution at a meeting of the directors are, according to the Nevada General Corporate Law and our Bylaws, as valid and effective as if they had been passed at a meeting of the directors duly called and held.

Nomination Process

As of August 31, 2017, we did not effect any material changes to2022, the procedures by which our shareholders may recommend nominees to our board of directors. Our board of directors does not have a policy with regards to the consideration of any director candidates recommended by our shareholders. Our board of directors has determined that it is in the best position to evaluate our company’s requirements as well as the qualifications of each candidate when the board considers a nominee for a position on our board of directors.Company had an active Governance and Nominating Committee. If shareholdersstakeholders wish to recommend candidates directly tofor our board,Board, they may do so by sending communications to the president of our CompanyGovernance and Nominating Committee at the address on the cover of this annual report.

70


53

Table of Contents

Audit and Finance Committee and Audit Committee Financial Expert

Currently our

The audit and finance committee consistsare governed by the audit and finance committee charter as adopted on December 8, 2020. The committee is composed of our entire board of directors. We currently do not have nominating, compensation committees or committees performing similar functions. There has not been any defined policy or procedure requirements for shareholders to submit recommendations or nomination for directors.

Our board of directors has determined that it does not haveMr. Al Reese, Jr., Mr. Ted McKechnie, and Mr. Nicholas Baxter. Mr. Reese, a member of its board of directors (audit committee) thatCPA, qualifies as an "audit“audit committee financial expert"expert” as defined in Item 407(d)(5)(ii) of Regulation S-K, and is "independent"“independent” as the term is used in Item 7(d)(3)(iv) of Schedule 14A under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Prior to Mr. Reese’s appointment in January 2021, Mr. Bunka acted as a member of the audit and finance committee and was not “independent” pursuant to Nasdaq independence standards as he is actively involved in the daily management of the Company as CEO. A copy of the Audit & Finance Committee charter can be downloaded from the Company’s website under our Investors/Governance/Governance Documents tab.

We believe

Our management is responsible for preparing our financial statements and our independent registered public accounting firm is responsible for auditing those financial statements. Our audit and finance committee consults with management and our independent registered public accounting firm and may initiate inquiries into various aspects of our financial affairs. They are responsible for retaining, evaluating and for the engagement of our independent registered public accounting firm and for the approval of professional services provided by them. However, it is not the duty of our audit and finance committee to determine that our financial statements are complete and accurate and in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles.

Compensation Committee

Our compensation committee was created on July 2, 2020, the members of which are Mr. Baxter, and Mr. McKechnie, with both directors being “independent” pursuant to Nasdaq independence standards. The compensation committee operates under a written charter and its purpose is to review, consider, research, and recommend compensation for the Company’s executive management, taking into consideration milestones achieved, the compensation issued by companies of similar size and the overall financial health of the Company. The committee is also responsible for reviewing and approving employment and benefits agreements and any executive compensation information incorporated into the Company’s periodic reports. A copy of the Compensation Committee charter can be downloaded from the Company’s website under our Investors/Governance/Governance Documents tab.

Governance and Nominating Committee

The governance and nominating committee operate pursuant to a charter created on December 8, 2020. The current members of the committee are Mr. Reese Jr. and Mr. Baxter, both being independent directors of the Company. The committee’s purpose is to assist our Board in fulfilling its responsibilities by: (i) being satisfied that corporate governance guidelines are adopted, applied and disclosed including director qualification standards, responsibilities and access to management and independent advisors, director compensation, orientation and continuing education, and annual performance evaluation of the board; (ii) identifying individuals qualified to become new board members and recommending to the board the nominees for each annual meeting of shareholders of the Corporation; and (iii) such other matters delegated to the committee by the board. A copy of the Governance & Nominating Committee charter can be downloaded from the Company’s website under our Investors/Governance/Governance Documents tab.

Our Board plays a critical role in guiding the strategic direction and overseeing the management of our business. We seek to attract and retain highly qualified directors who have sufficient time to engage in the activities of our Board and to understand and enhance their knowledge of our industry and business plans. In evaluating the suitability of individual candidates, the governance and nominating committee and our Board may take into account many factors, including: relevant education, experience and expertise; knowledge of the Company and the issues it faces; whether the candidate will strengthen the board and remedy any perceived deficiencies in the specific criteria; moral and ethical character; diversity of expertise and experience in substantive matters pertaining to our business relative to other board members; diversity of background and perspective, including, but not limited to, with respect to age, gender, race, place of residence and specialized experience; and any other relevant qualifications, attributes or skills. The core competencies of directors are collectively capableshould address accounting or finance experience, market familiarity, business or management experience, industry knowledge, customer-base experience or perspective, crisis response, leadership, and/or strategic planning.

Our Board and governance and nominating committee evaluate each individual in the context of analyzingthe board as a whole, with the objective of assembling a group that can best perpetuate the success of the business and evaluating our consolidated financial statements and understanding internal controls and procedures for financial reporting. We believe that retaining an independent director who would qualify as an "audit committee financial expert" would be overly costly and burdensome and is not warrantedrepresent stockholder interests through the exercise of sound judgment using its diversity of experience in our circumstances given the early stages of our development and the fact that we have not generated any material revenues to date. In addition, we currently do not have nominating, compensation or audit committees or committees performing similar functions nor do we have a written nominating, compensation or audit committee charter. Our board of directors does not believe that it is necessary to have such committees because it believes the functions of such committees can be adequately performed by our board of directors.these various areas.

Item 11. Executive Compensation

The particulars of the compensation paid to the following persons:

(a)

-

our principal executive officer;

(b)

-

each of our two most highly compensated executive officers who were serving as executive officers at the end of the years ended August 31, 20172022, and August 31, 2016; and2021, and;

(c)

-

up to two additional individuals for whom disclosure would have been provided under (b) but for the fact that the individual was not serving as our executive officer at the end of the years ended August 31, 20172022, and August 31, 2016,2021,

54

Table of Contents

who we will

collectively referreferred to as the named executive officers of our Company, are set out in the following summary compensation table, except thattable. There is no disclosure is provided for any named executive officer, other than our principal executive officers, whose total compensation did not exceed $100,000 for the respective fiscal year:

71



SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE


Name and
Principal
Position




Year




Salary
($)




Bonus
($)



Stock
Awards
($)




Awards
($)

Non-Equity
Incentive
Plan
Compensation
($)

Non-Qualified
Deferred
Compensation
Earnings
($)



All Other
Compensation
($)




Total
($)
Christopher
Bunka(1),
Chairman, Chief
Executive
Officer &
Director
2017
2016



-
-



-
-



61,950(7)
-



-
-



-
-



-
-



147,800
120,000



209,750
120,000



Bal Bhullar(2),
Chief Financial
Officer &
Director
2017
2016

-
-

-
-

-
-

-
-

-
-

-
-

-
44,767

-
44,767

Tom Irkhe(4)
Vice President
2017
2016
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
18,000
-
18,000
John Docherty(5)
President
2017
2016
-
-
-
-
97,710(6)
21,000
-
32,768(3)
-
-
-
-
143,434
117,213
241,144
170,981
Allan
Spissinger(8)
Interim Chief
Financial Officer
2017


-


-


-


54,204(9)


-


-


57,104


111,308



SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE

Name and Principal Position

 

Year

 

Salary

$

 

 

Bonus

$

 

 

Stock Awards

$

 

 

Option Awards(5)

$

 

 

Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation

$

 

 

Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation Earnings

$

 

 

All Other Compensation

$

 

 

Total

$

 

Christopher Bunka Chairman, Chief

Executive Officer & Director (1)

 

2022

 

 

-

 

 

 

50,401

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

143,968

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

289,505

 

 

 

483,874

 

 

2021

 

 

-

 

 

 

92,676

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

119,630

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

281,810

 

 

 

494,116

 

John Docherty

President & Director (2)

 

2022

 

 

218,315

 

 

 

44,542

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

143,968

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

32,887

 

 

 

439,712

 

 

2021

 

 

146,443

 

 

 

82,652

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

83,419

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

97,760

 

 

 

410,274

 

Greg Downey

Chief Financial Officer (3)

 

2022

 

 

117,284

 

 

 

9,131

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

116,036

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

242,451

 

 

2021

 

 

84,688

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

34,844

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

119,352

 

Allan Spissinger former Chief Financial Officer (4)

 

2022

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

4,122

 

 

 

4,122

 

 

2021

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

109,579

 

 

 

109,579

 

(1)

Mr. Bunka was appointed as chairman, president, chief executive officer,Chairman, President, Chief Executive Officer, and director on October 26, 2006, and was chief financial officer of our company from April 29, 2016 to May 31 2017. He resigned as president on April 15, 2015.2006. We pay Mr. Bunka a consulting fee through CAB Financial Services Ltd., where he is also the Chief Executive Officer.

(2)

Ms. Bhullar was appointed Chief Financial Officer on May 12, 2009 and resigned April 29, 2016. We paid Ms. Bhullar consulting fees through her wholly owned company BKB Management Ltd.

(3)

The fair value of the stock options awarded was estimated using the Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following assumptions: expected volatility of 240%; risk-free interest rate of 1.22%; expected life of 5 years; and dividend yield of 0.00%.

(4)

Mr. Ihrke became Vice President on December 23, 2015 and resigned on March 8, 2016.

(5)

Mr. Docherty became President on April 15, 2015, and a director on April 29, 2016. We pay Mr. Docherty aas an employee effective January 1, 2022, and previously through consulting fee throughfees paid to his wholly owned company Docherty Management Ltd.

(6)

Pursuant to the agreement with Docherty Management Ltd. Mr. Docherty received 462,000 (2016 - 210,000) common shares with a value of 97,710 (2016 - $21,000).(3)

(7)

Pursuant to the agreement with CAB Financial Services Ltd. Mr. Bunka received 210,000 (2016 - NIL) common shares with a value of $61,950 (2016 - $NIL).

(8)

Mr. SpissingerDowney became Interim Chief Financial Officer on June 1, 2017.April 15, 2021 and is considered an employee of the Company.

(4)

Mr. Spissinger was replaced as CFO effective April 15, 2021 and remained with the company until the end of his contract on May 31, 2021. We paypaid Mr. Spissinger a consulting fee through his wholly owned company M&E Services Ltd.

(9)

(5)

The fair value of the stock options awarded was estimated using the Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following assumptions: expected volatility of 102%; risk-free interest rate of 1.71%; expected life of 5 years; and dividend yield of 0%.model.

72


Our company is currently paying consulting fees to our chief executive officer $12,000 per month, our president CAD$15,000 per monthConsulting and our Interim Chief Financial Officer CAD$8,000 per month in consulting fees.Employment Agreements

Consulting Agreements

On December 1, 2016, the Company amended its agreement with CAB Financial Services Ltd. As Chief Executive Officer for a revised consulting fee of $12,000 per month plus applicable taxes, superseding the previous agreement for $10,000 per month plus applicable taxes.

On May 12, 2009 the Company entered into a consulting agreement with BKB Management Ltd. to act as the Chief Financial Officer and a Director. December 1, 2014, the Company entered into an updated consulting agreement for CAD$7,500 per month plus GST. Effective April 29, 2016, BKB Management Ltd. resigned its position and the contract was terminated.

On December 23, 2014, the Company entered into a revised Executive Management consulting agreement with Tom Ihrke for $3,000 per month. Effective March 8, 2016 Mr. Ihrke resigned and the contract was terminated.

On March 1, 2017, the Company executed a revised twenty four month consulting contract with Docherty Management Limited, solely owned by Mr. John Docherty to act as President with monthly compensation of CAD$15,000 plus applicable taxes, superseding the previous agreement with monthly compensation of CAD$12,500 plus applicable taxes.

On June 1, 2017, the Company executed a twelve month contract with M&E Services Ltd., a wholly owned company by Mr. Allan Spissinger, as interim Chief Financial Officer with monthly compensation of CAD$8,000 plus applicable taxes.

Other than as set out in this annual report on Form 10-K we have not entered into any employment or consulting agreements with any of our current officers directors or employees.directors.

Mr. Chris Bunka, CEO

The Company secured a 3-year term renewable management contract with Mr. Bunka effective January 1, 2022, with a base compensation of C$29,706 per month with an annual increase of 1.25 times the annual Canadian inflation rate. A performance bonus of up to 50% of 12 times the monthly fee may be payable upon the completion of certain performance criteria as determined by our Board. Participation in the Company’s stock option plan is also included.

The contract entitles Mr. Bunka to compensation of 2% of the consideration of the total value of any subsidiary sold and upon a change of control is entitled to 26 times the monthly fee, excluding certain circumstances. The termination clause requires 15 months written notice plus one addition months’ written notice for each completed year of service for terminating the contract without cause. Payment may be made in lieu of and if so, the Company would be liable for a termination payment of 15 times the monthly fee plus one additional month’s payment for each completed year of service of up to a maximum payment of 24 times the monthly fee.

55

Table of Contents

Mr. John Docherty, President

The Company entered into a 3-year term renewable executive employment agreement with Mr. John Docherty for a management contract for C$323,176 per year, effective January 1, 2022, with an annual increase of 1.25 times the annual Canadian inflation rate. A performance bonus equal to 50% of the annual compensation may be payable upon the completion of certain performance criteria as determined by our Board. Participation in the Company’s stock option plan is also included. An annual professional development allowance of C$15,000 is also available to Mr. Docherty.

The contract for the services includes entitlement to compensation of 2% of the consideration received by the Company from the sale of any subsidiary, excluding certain circumstances. Upon the occurrence of a change of control, Mr. Docherty will be entitled to a lump payment of 21 months pay subject to certain exemptions. The contract specifies that 60 days written notice for termination by Mr. Docherty and termination without cause by the Company would result in 12 months pay in lieu of notice plus one additional month’s written notice or payment in lieu, for each completed year of service up to a maximum payment of 24 months.

Mr. Greg Downey, CFO

On April 15, 2021, the Company entered into an employment contract with Mr. Downey with annual compensation of C$144,000 with a 10% annual increase. A performance bonus equal to 50% of the annual compensation may be payable upon the completion of certain performance criteria. Mr. Downey is entitled to participate in the Company’s stock option plan and an annual professional development allowance of C$5,000 per year.

Mr. Downey is eligible for incentive compensation of 1% of the consideration received from the sale of any subsidiary excluding certain circumstances. Upon the occurrence of a change of control, Mr. Downey will also be entitled to a lump payment of sixteen (16) times his monthly salary. Termination without cause requires a minimum of 3 months notice or payment in lieu, plus one month salary for every year or partial year for each additional year of service.

Grants of Plan-Based Awards Table

We did not grant any

Lexaria issued the following plan-based awards to our named executive officers induring the during our fiscal year ended August 31, 2017.2022:

Compensation Securities

Executive

Officer

Type of

compensation

security

Number of

compensation

securities,

number of

underlying

securities, and

percentage of

class

Date of

issue or

grant

Issue,

conversion

or exercise

price

$

Closing

price of

security or

underlying

security on

date of

grant

$

Closing

price of

security or

underlying

security at

year end

$

Expiry

date

Chris Bunka,

CEO

Stock Options

15,000

30,000

09/01/2021

08/29/2022

6.23

2.91

6.22

3.01

2.96

09/01/2026

08/29/2027

John Docherty,

President

Stock Options

15,000

30,000

09/01/2021

08/29/2022

6.23

2.91

6.22

3.01

2.96

09/01/2026

08/29/2027

Greg Downey,

CFO

Stock Options

10,000

11,000

09/01/2021

08/29/2022

6.23

2.91

6.22

3.01

2.96

09/01/2026

08/29/2027

56

Table of Contents

Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year End

The particulars of unexercised options, stock that has not vested and equity incentive plan awards for our named executive officers are set out in the following table:

73



  OUTSTANDING EQUITY AWARDS AT FISCAL YEAR-END  
 OPTION AWARDSSTOCK AWARDS












Name







Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options
Exercisable
(#)







Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options

(#)



Equity
Incentive
Plan
Awards:
Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Unearned
Options
(#)









Option
Exercise
Price

($)











Option
Expiration
Date



Number
of
Shares
or Units
of Stock
That
Have
Not
Vested

(#)




Market
Value of
Shares
or Units
of Stock
That
Have
Not
Vested
($)
Equity
Incentive
Plan
Awards:
Number of
Unearned
Shares,
Units or
Other
Rights
That
Have Not
Vested
(#)
Equity
Incentive
Plan
Awards:
Market or
Payout
Value of
Unearned
Shares,
Units or
Other Rights
That Have
Not Vested
(#)
Christopher
Bunka
550,000
247,500
-
-
-
-
$0.11
$0.10
2019/12/22
2018/06/18
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
John
Docherty
550,000
300,000
-
-
-
-
$0.10
$0.11
2020/03/26
2021/04/15
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Tom Ihrke330,000--$0.112019/12/22----
Allan Spissinger200,000--$0.372022/06/01----

OUTSTANDING EQUITY AWARDS AT FISCAL YEAR-END

OPTION AWARDS

STOCK AWARDS

Executive

Officer

Number of

Securities

Underlying

Unexercised

Options

Exercisable

(#)

Number of

Securities

Underlying Unexercised

Options

Unexercisable

(#)

Equity

Incentive

Plan

Awards:

Number of

Securities

Underlying

Unexercised

Unearned

Options

(#)

Option

Exercise

Price$

Option

Expiration

Date

Number of

Shares or

Units of

Stock

That

Have

Not

Vested (#)

Market

Value of

Shares or

Units of

Stock

That

Have

Not

Vested

$

Equity

Incentive

Plan

Awards:

Number of

Unearned

Shares,

Units or

Other

Rights

That Have

Not Vested

(#)

Equity

Incentive

Plan

Awards:

Market or

Payout

Value of

Unearned

Shares,

Units or

Other

Rights

That

Have Not

Vested

(#)

Christopher Bunka

26,000

23,334

15,000

30,000

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

$5.83

$7.08

$6.23

$2.91

04/23/2026

06/08/2026

09/01/2026

08/29/2027

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

John Docherty

13,334

18,000

18,334

15,000

30,000

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

$9.60

$5.31

$7.08

$6.23

$2.91

04/23/2025

04/23/2026

06/08/2026

09/01/2026

08/29/2027

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

Greg Downey

12,000

5,000

8,000

10,000

11,000

4,000

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

$5.04

$5.31

$7.08

$6.23

$2.91

04/24/2026

04/25/2026

06/08/2026

09/01/2026

08/29/2027

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

Option Exercises

During our fiscal

No options were exercised by any named executive officer during the year ended August 31, 2017, on January 9 2017, Allan Spissinger exercised 27,500 options previously granted at $0.10 prior to his being appointed interim CFO June 1 2017.2022.

Compensation of Directors

We do not have any agreements for compensating

As of August 31, 2022, three of our directors are compensated for their services. In their capacity as independent directors each receives $30,000 per year paid quarterly in advance. Directors are also paid nominal amounts for their services in their capacityon the audit and finance, compensation, and the governance and nominating committees and for acting as chair of such committees.

Three independent directors although such directors are expected in the future to receivewere granted an aggregate of 14,400 stock options to purchase shares of our common stock as awarded by our board of directors. We have an agreement with a director for marketing services that is notcalculated fair value of $44,827 and included in their capacity as a director for $4,000 per month plus applicable taxes.consulting expense during the fiscal year 2022.

Pension, Retirement or Similar Benefit Plans

There are no arrangements or plans in which we provide pension, retirement or similar benefits for directors or executive officers. We have no material bonus or profit sharingprofit-sharing plans pursuant to which cash or non-cash compensation is or may be paid to our directors or executive officers, except that stock options may be granted at the discretion of the board of directorsour Board or a committee thereof.

Indebtedness of Directors, Senior Officers, Executive Officers, and Other Management

None of our directors or executive officers or any associate or affiliate of our company during the last two fiscal years is or has been indebted to our companyCompany by way of guarantee, support agreement, letter of credit or other similar agreement or understanding currently outstanding.

74


57

Table of Contents

Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation

During 2017, we did not have

No member of the Compensation Committee is, or was during fiscal 2022, an officer or employee of the Company or any of its subsidiaries or was formerly an officer of the Company or any of its subsidiaries. No member of the Compensation Committee is, or was during fiscal 2022, an executive officer of another company whose board of directors has a compensationcomparable committee or another committeeon which one of the Company’s executive officers serves.

Board Diversity

The Company and its management are highly supportive of the recent initiatives taken by the Securities and Exchange Commission and the Nasdaq Group to encourage diversity within the board of directors performing equivalent functions. Insteadof reporting companies. Lexaria annually reviews its board composition and evaluates areas of expertise that would provide additional benefits to the entire boardCompany and its shareholders.

During fiscal 2022, the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee, with the assistance of directors performed the function of compensation committee. Our board of directors approved the executive compensation, however, there were no deliberations relatingmanagement, began vetting candidates who would enhance the board with their expertise in the bioscience industry sector and who would enhance the board with their diverse perspectives. As the Company transitions its technology towards pharmaceutical applications, we will endeavour to executive officer compensation during 2017.engage individuals who are able to enhance the board with expertise in this industry sector and who also will enrich the board with their diverse perspectives. Subsequent to the fiscal year end the board appointed Dr. Catherine C. Turkel as a director on September 2, 2022.

Compensation Committee Report

None.

Our Compensation Committee has reviewed and discussed the Executive Compensation for the year ended August 31, 2022, with management. Based on the reviews and discussions our Compensation Committee recommended to our Board that the Executive Compensation discussed above be included in this annual report on Form 10-K.

Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters

The following table sets forth as of November 22, 2017, certain information with respect to the beneficial ownership of our common shares by each shareholder known by us to be the beneficial owner of more than 5% of our common shares, as well as by each of our current directors and executive officers as a group.group, as of August 31, 2022. Each person has sole voting and investment power with respect to the shares of common stock, except as otherwise indicated. Beneficial ownership consists of a direct interest in the shares of common stock, except as otherwise indicated.


Name and Address of Beneficial Owner
 Amount and Nature of
Beneficial Ownership
  Percentage
of Class
 
Christopher Bunka; Kelowna BC Canada 14,114,923(1) 19.97% 
Nicholas Baxter; Aberdeenshire, UK 330,000(2) 0.47% 
John Docherty; Toronto, Ontario 2,127,000(3) 3.03% 
Ted McKechnie; Toronto, Ontario 431,104(4) 0.62% 
Allan Spissinger; Langley, BC 227,500(5) 0.33% 
Directors and Executive Officers as a Group (5 persons) 17,230,527  24.42% 
David DeMartini, Texas, Houston 3,609,375  5.2% 
Total as a Group (6 persons)(6) 20,839,902  29.61% 

*           Less than 1%.

Name and Address of Beneficial Owner

 

Amount and

Nature of

Beneficial

Ownership

 

 

Percentage

of Class

 

Christopher Bunka; Kelowna BC, Canada

 

 

590,456

(1)

 

 

9.76%

John Docherty; Toronto, ON, Canada

 

 

148,743

(2)

 

 

2.46%

Greg Downey; Kelowna, BC, Canada *

 

 

47,883

(3)

 

 

0.80%

Ted McKechnie; Toronto, ON, Canada *

 

 

24,991

(4)

 

 

0.42%

Nicholas Baxter; Aberdeenshire, UK *

 

 

22,800

(5)

 

 

0.38%

Al Reese Jr., Houston, TX, USA *

 

 

17,717

(6)

 

 

0.30%

Directors and Executive Officers as a Group (6 persons)

 

 

852,590

 

 

 

14.12%

Don Jackler, New York, NY, USA

 

 

580,582

(7)

 

 

9.59%

(1)

*

Includes 5,631,844Less than 1% beneficial ownership

(1)

Chairman and CEO Chris Bunka directly held 273,543 shares and 215,912 shares held in the name of C.A.B. Financial Services and 7,235,579 shares held directly by Chris Bunka, chairman, chief executive officer and a director of our company. Includes 450,000Services. His holdings included 6,667 warrants held directly by Chris Bunka with an exercise price of $0.14. Includes 247,000 options which are exercisable at $0.09$10.50 and 550,000the following exercisable options: 26,000 at $5.83, 23,334 at $7.08, 15,000 at $6.23 and 30,000 at $2.91.

(2)

Director and President John Docherty holdings include 13,334 options exercisable at $0.10.$9.60, 18,000 at $5.31, 18,334 at $7.08, 15,000 at $6.23 and 30,000 at $2.91.

(3)

CFO Greg Downey holdings include 12,000 options exercisable at $5.04, 5,000 at $5.31, 8,000 at $7.08, 10,000 at $6.23 and 11,000 at $2.91.

(4)

Director Ted McKechnie holdings includes 1,500 options exercisable at $5.31, 5,000 at $7.08, 1,900 at $6.23 and 3,400 at $3.39.

(5)

Director Nicholas Baxter holdings includes 1,500 options exercisable at $5.31, 5,000 at $7.08. 1,900 at $6.23 and 3,400 at $3.39.

(6)

Director Al Reese Jr. holdings includes 3,400 options exercisable at $4.80 and 3,400 at $3.39.

(7)

Mr. Jackler is a consultant whose holdings include 100,000 warrants exercisable at $7.00.

 
(2)58

Includes 110,000 options which are exercisable at $0.10. Nicholas Baxter is a director of our company.

Table of Contents
(3)

Includes 550,000 options which are exercisable at $0.10 and 300,000 options which are exercisable at $0.11. John Docherty is the President and a Director of our Company

(4)

Includes 110,000 options exercisable at $0.17. Ted McKechnie is a Director of our Company.

(5)

Includes 200,000 options exercisable at $0.37. Allan Spissinger is interim chief financial officer of our company.

(6)

Under Rule 13d-3, a beneficial owner of a security includes any person who, directly or indirectly, through any contract, arrangement, understanding, relationship, or otherwise has or shares: (i) voting power, which includes the power to vote, or to direct the voting of shares; and (ii) investment power, which includes the power to dispose or direct the disposition of shares. Certain shares may be deemed to be beneficially owned by more than one person (if, for example, persons share the power to vote or the power to dispose of the shares). In addition, shares are deemed to be beneficially owned by a person if the person has the right to acquire the shares (for example, upon exercise of an option) within 60 days of the date as of which the information is provided. In computing the percentage ownership of any person, the amount of shares outstanding is deemed to include the amount of shares beneficially owned by such person (and only such person) by reason of these acquisition rights. As a result, the percentage of outstanding shares of any person as shown in this table does not necessarily reflect the person’s actual ownership or voting power with respect to the number of shares of common stock actually outstanding on November 22, 2017. As of November 22, 2017, there were 69,435,198 shares of our common stock issued and outstanding.

75


Under Rule 13d-3, a beneficial owner of a security includes any person who, directly or indirectly, through any contract, arrangement, understanding, relationship, or otherwise has or shares: (i) voting power, which includes the power to vote, or to direct the voting of shares; and (ii) investment power, which includes the power to dispose or direct the disposition of shares. Certain shares may be deemed to be beneficially owned by more than one person (if, for example, persons share the power to vote or the power to dispose of the shares). In addition, shares are deemed to be beneficially owned by a person if the person has the right to acquire the shares (for example, upon exercise of an option) within 60 days of the date as of which the information is provided. In computing the percentage ownership of any person, the amount of shares outstanding is deemed to include the number of shares beneficially owned by such person (and only such person) by reason of these acquisition rights. As a result, the percentage of outstanding shares of any person as shown in the table above does not necessarily reflect the person’s actual ownership or voting power with respect to the number of shares of common stock actually outstanding on August 31, 2022. As of November 25, 2022, there were 5,950,998 shares of our common stock issued and outstanding.

Changes in Control

We are unaware of any contract or other arrangement the operation of which may at a subsequent date result in a change in control of our company.Company.

Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence

Except as disclosed herein, no

No director, executive officer, shareholder holding at least 5% of shares of our common stock, or any family member thereof, had any material interest, direct or indirect, in any transaction, or proposed transaction since the year ended August 31, 2017,2022, in which the amount involved in the transaction exceeded or exceeds the lesser of $120,000 or one percent of the average of our total assets at the yearendyear end for the last three completed fiscal years.

Director Independence

We currently act with four

Lexaria directors consisting ofare Mr. Christopher Bunka, Mr. John Docherty, Mr. Nicholas Baxter, Mr. Ted McKechnie, Mr. Al Reese Jr. and Ted McKechnie.Ms. Catherine Turkel. We have determined that NicholasMr. Baxter, is anMr. McKechnie, Mr. Reese and Ms. Turkel are “independent director”directors” as defined in NASDAQNasdaq Marketplace Rule 4200(a)(15).

Currently our

Our audit and finance committee consists of our entire board of directors. We currently do not have nominating, compensation committees or committees performing similar functions. There has not been any defined policy or procedure requirements for shareholders to submit recommendations or nomination for directors.

Our board of directors has determined that it does not have a member of its audit committeeMr. Baxter, Mr. McKechnie, and Mr. Reese, who qualifies as an “audit committee financial expert” as defined in Item 407(d)(5)(ii) of Regulation S-K.

From inception to present date, we believe that the members of our audit committee and the board of directorsour Board have been and are collectively capable of analyzing and evaluating our financial statements and understanding internal controls and procedures for financial reporting.

We do not have a standing

Our compensation orcommittee consists of the following independent directors: Mr. McKechnie, and Mr. Baxter. During fiscal year ended August 31, 2022, the compensation committee held one meeting to determine bonus compensation payable to the named executive officers in connection with the successful completion of certain performance milestones.

Our appointed governance and nominating committee but our entire boardconsist of directors act in such capacity. We believe that our directors are capable of analyzingthe following independent directors: Mr. Reese Jr. and evaluating our financial statements and understanding internal controls and procedures for financial reporting. Our directors do not believe that it is necessary toMr. Baxter. To date no meetings have an audit committee because we believe that the functions of an audit committee can be adequately performedbeen held by the board of directors. In addition, we believe that retaining additional independent directors who would qualify as an “audit committee financial expert” would be overly costly and burdensome and is not warranted in our circumstances given the early stages of our development.this committee.

76


Item 14. Principal Accounting Fees and Services

The aggregate fees billed for the most recently completed fiscal year ended August 31, 20172022, and for fiscal year ended August 31, 20162021 for professional services rendered by the principal accountant for the audit of our annual financial statements and review of the financial statements included in our quarterly reports on Form 10-Q and services that are normally provided by the accountant in connection with statutory and regulatory filings or engagements for these fiscal periods were as follows:

  Year Ended 
  August 31, 2017  August 31, 2016 
Audit Fees 35,392  38,186 
Audit Related Fees -  - 
Tax Fees 15,982  - 
All Other Fees -  - 
Total 51,374  38,186 

Audit Fees:

Year Ended

August 31, 2022

August 31, 2021

Principal Accounting Fees

$

$

Audit

86,975

73,733

Audit related

25,521

18,458

Tax

-

-

Total

112,496

92,191

Audit fees consist of fees billed for professional services rendered for the audits of our financial statements on Form 10-K and the reviews of our interim financial statements included in quarterly reports services performed in connection with filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission and related comfort letters and other services that are provided by the Company’s principal accountants for the fiscal years ended August 31, 2017 and August 31, 2016 in connection with statutory and regulatory filings or engagements.filed on Form 10-Q.

Audit related Fees:

Audit related fees consist of fees billed for assurance and related services by the Company’s principal accountant that are reasonably related to the performance of the audit or review of the Company’s financial statements, which are not included in the Audit Fees described above.

Tax Fees. Tax fees consist of fees billed for professional services for tax compliance, tax advice and tax planning. These services include assistance regarding federal, state and local tax compliance and consultation in connection with various transactions and acquisitions.

We do not use our principal accountants for services other than the ones relatedthose relative to the our annual audit and the review of our interim financial statements.statements and certain SEC filings. We therefore do not involve our principal accountants for matters related to tax compliance and financial information system design and implementation. These services, which includeincluding corporate tax preparation and the designing or implementing of a system that aggregates source data underlying the financial statements or generates information that is significant to our financial statements, are provided internally or by other service providers.

Effective May 6, 2003, the Securities

Our Audit and Exchange Commission adopted rules that require that before our independent auditors are engaged by us to render any auditing or permitted non-audit related service, the engagement be:

Our board of directors pre-approvespre-approve all services provided by our independent auditors.auditors according to the Audit and Finance Committee’s Charter as set out in Exhibit “A” in the Company’s Schedule 14A Definitive Proxy Statement filed with the SEC on April 13, 2022. All of the above audit services and fees were reviewed and approved by the board of directors either before or after the respective services were rendered.

Our board of directors has considered the nature and amount of fees billed bycommittee. As our independent auditors and believes that the provisiondo not provide service outside of services for activities unrelated to the audit function the auditors’ independence is compatible with maintaining our independent auditors’ independence.maintained.

77


59

Table of Contents

PART IV

Item 15. Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules

a) Financial Statements

(a)

Financial Statements1)

(1)

Financial statements for our Company are listed in the index under Item 8 of this documentdocument.

(2)

2)

All financial statement schedules are omitted because they are not applicable, not material or the required information is shown in the financial statements or notes thereto.

b) Exhibits

Exhibit Number

Description

(b)

(2)

Exhibits


Exhibit No.Document Description

Plan of Acquisition, Reorganization, Arrangement, Liquidation or Succession

(31)

2.1

Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a)

Plan of Conversion (included as Schedule “A” to the proxy statement/prospectus)

31.1*

(3)

Articles of Incorporation and Bylaws

3.1*

Articles of Incorporation

3.2*

Bylaws

3.3

Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation (Filed on Form 8-K January 14, 2021 Exh. 3.1)

3.4

Second Amended and Restated Bylaws (incorporated by reference as Exhibit 3.2 to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed January 14, 2021)

3.5

Amended and Restated Bylaws (Filed on Form S-1 June 3, 2020 Exh 3.4)

3.6

Amendment to Articles of Incorporation – Share Consolidation (Filed on Form 8-K June 23, 2009 Exh 3.1)

3.7

Amendment to Articles of Incorporation – Share Expansion (Filed on Form 8-K March 10th, 2010)

3.8

Amendment to Articles of Incorporation –Share Forward Split (Filed on Form 8-K December 16th, 2015 Exh 3.1)

3.9

Amendment to Articles of Incorporation – Name Change (Filed on Form 8-K May 11th, 2016 Exh 99.1)

(4)

Instruments Defining the Rights of Security Holders, including Indentures

4.1

Equity Incentive Plan (Filed on Form S-8 July 30, 2021)

(10)

Material Contracts

10.1

Executive Employment Agreement dated Dec. 31, 2021 with John Docherty (filed on Form 10-Q January 14, 2022 Exh 10.1)

10.2

Management Services Agreement dated Dec. 31, 2021 with C.A.B. Financial Services Ltd. (Chris Bunka) (filed on Form 10-Q January 14, 2022 Exh 10.2)

10.3

Redacted Intellectual Property License Agreement dated May 20, 2022 between Lexaria Hemp Corp. and Premier Wellness Science Co., Ltd. (filed on Form 10-Q July 14, 2022 Exh 10.3)

10.4

Underwriting Agreement with H.C. Wainwright & Co. LLC (incorporated by reference as Exhibit 1.1 to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed January 14, 2021)

10.5

Asset Purchase Agreement with Hill Street Beverage Company Inc. (incorporated by reference as Exhibit 10.31 to our Registration Statement on Form S-1 filed November 20, 2020)

(21)

Subsidiaries

21.1

List of Subsidiaries of the Registrant (Filed on Form 10-K November 29, 2021 Exh 21.1)

(23)

Consents of Experts and Counsel

23.1

Consent of Davidson & Company LLP, Chartered Professional Accountants

(31)

Rule 13(a) - 14 (a)/15(d) - 14(a)

31.1

Section 302 Certifications under Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 of Principal Executive Officer

31.2*31.2

Section 302 Certifications under Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 of Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer

(32)

Section 1350 Certifications

32.1*32.1

Section 906 Certification under Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002 of Principal Executive Officer

32.2*32.2

Section 906 Certification under Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002 of Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer

(101)**

Interactive Data Files

101.INS

XBRL Instance Document

101.SCH

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document

101. CAL

101.CAL

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document

101.DEF

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document

101.LAB

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document

101.PRE

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document


*Filed herewith.

*Incorporated by reference to same exhibit filed with the Company’s Registration Statement on Form SB-2 filed March 1, 2006.

** Furnished herewith. Pursuant to Rule 406T of Regulation S-T, the Interactive Data Files on Exhibit 101 hereto are deemed not filed or part of any registration statement or prospectus for purposes of Sections 11 or 12 of the Securities Act of 1933, are deemed not filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, and otherwise are not subject to liability under those sections.

 
**60

Furnished herewith. Pursuant to Rule 406T of Regulation S-T, the Interactive Data Files on Exhibit 101 hereto are deemed not filed or part of any registration statement or prospectus for purposes of Sections 11 or 12 of the Securities Act of 1933, are deemed not filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, and otherwise are not subject to liability under those sections

Table of Contents

78


SIGNATURES

In accordance with Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act, the registrant caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

LEXARIA BIOSCIENCE CORP.

LEXARIA CORP.

By:

By: /s/

/s/ Christopher Bunka

Christopher Bunka
Chief Executive Officer, Chairman and Director
(Principal Executive Officer)
Date: November 21, 2017

Christopher Bunka

Chief Executive Officer, Chairman and Director

(Principal Executive Officer)

Date: November 25, 2022

In accordance with the Exchange Act, this Report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

By:

/s/ Christopher Bunka

Christopher Bunka

Chief Executive Officer, Chairman and Director

(Principal Executive Officer)

Date: November 25, 2022

Christopher Bunka

By:

/s/ John Docherty

John Docherty

President and Director

Date: November 25, 2022

Chief Executive Officer, Chairman and Director

By:

/s/ Gregory Downey

Gregory Downey CPA, CMA

Chief Financial Officer

(Principal Financial Officer)

Date: November 25, 2022

(Principal Executive Officer)

By:

/s/Ted McKechnie

Ted McKechnie

Director

Date: November 25, 2022

By:

/s/Nicholas Baxter

Nicholas Baxter

Director

Date: November 25, 2022

By:

/s/Albert Reese Jr.

Albert Reese Jr.

Director

Date: November 25, 2022

By:

/s/Catherine C. Turkel

Catherine C. Turkel

Director

Date: November 25, 2022

 
Date: November 21, 201761
By:/s/ John Docherty
John Docherty
President and Director
Date: November 21, 2017
By:/s/ Allan Spissinger
Allan Spissinger CPA, CA
Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Accounting Officer)
Date: November 21, 2017
By:/s/Ted McKechnie
Ted McKechnie
Director
Date: November 21, 2017

79